Again you don t decide what NPOV means When you arrogantly assert that your position is the only one that conforms to wikipedia policies against consensus it s very disruptive Furthermore the viewpoint that life on earth came from nonliving matter by spontaneous generation and evolved solely by natural selection to its present state without planning from a designer is far and away the minority viewpoint If we really followed NPOV we wouldn t mention the fringe viewpoints of a slight majority of scientists and instead focus on the clear consensus among the public religious leaders and a strong minority of scientists that life on Earth was designed Are you simply ignoring this