The trouble is that that version was hype too Wikipedia is not a press coverage scrapbook WP LINKFARM I realise it was put in to peacock Ethereum for the AFD which is why it looked so artificial but the point stands that if those articles are worth including they need to actually be used as references I note also the heading is reception none of it is talking about how Ethereum has been received it s just a list of press clippings From e g the version before I touched it there s two statements from non SP notable people and one from someone notable enough to have a WP article who also happens to do amateur economics blogging So if a Reception section is to be of value it needs to actually be about the reception