That s why I mentioned those quotes from Hansard They are the people who wrote the policy and many of them held quite clearly racist views Including those would illustrate and validate the description of the policy as racist Opinions of Deakin et al could be put alongside to illustrate that a small minority supported the policy for protectionist reasons and quotes from Pulsford could be included too to show that an even smaller minority disagreed with having the policy at all I ve not much time now so if someone else could do that that d be great talk