So his summaries weren t AS antagonistic So whichever person is a bit more antagonistic gets the warning Good to know On to your second claim I still don t understand how I have a pattern of edit warring but Olyeller doesn t when 1 I added a completely valid and relevant and referenced sentence and 2 OlYeller repeatedly removed it for NO VALID REASON and 3 Olyeller falsely claimed in his summary that the issue was presented in the talk page So it s odd that falsifying summaries isn t considered a form of antagonism and or worthy of a warning The only reason OlYeller removed it is because he has a really big anti Carbonator grudge I once called him a thin skinned prick and he took it badly He now confirms the validity of said appellation by obsessively searching for ANY of my edits and reverting them which is exactly what he did in this case How is that not vandalism