As far as I m concerned the ANI incident changes nothing as it was not verified to be him to a reasonable degree necessary to take any action To consider anything that was said or done from that ANI and use that as a basis for any change from yesterday would be inconsistent with our ideals I m willing to consider any evidence that there has been breach of the terms of the RFC U but I will not accept a standard of verification that is different than what I would want the community to use on me if I were accused of the same offense As admins and editors we are duty bound to respect the outcome of the RFC U the consensus of the community until reasonable and reliable evidence is presented that a breach of the terms has occurred This principle is larger than any issue with YRC as it speaks to and defines our character 2 Join WER