Fred Thank you for your clarification I did not realize that if you are an author in a field that you are automatically conflicted That kind of keep all experts out of the knowledge cycle curious Just to be perfectly clear original contributions to the page were made by others I merely noted the vandalism of the page by Doc James and restored the uncalled for deletions If I have suggestions for additions in the future I will certainly submit them officially for review But here is my question to you what happens when someone with no experience or knowledge removes properly submitted information as in the case of Doc James Does one just sit idly by and allow misinformation or removal of accurate information I was under the impression that Wiki was there for educational purposes So for me and others I have discussed this with random removal of information without justification runs contrary to the Wiki goals Can you help me out with understanding this