RIR it seems obvious you don t like the presence of Usana corp reps by your attempts to discredit them immediately upon arrival by asking Jean314 for proof of vandalism sock puppetry but none of the 4 behaviors in the inappropriate notification policy apply to this request for insiders Spamming Posting an excessive number of messages to individual users or to users with no significant connection to the topic at hand Campaigning Posting a notification of discussion that presents the topic in a non neutral manner Vote stacking Posting messages to users selected based on their known opinions which may be made known by a userbox user category or prior statement Vote banking involves recruiting editors perceived as having a common viewpoint for a group similar to a political party in the expectation that notifying the group of any discussion related to that viewpoint will result in a numerical advantage much as a form of prearranged vote stacking Stealth canvassing Contacting users off wiki by e mail for example to persuade them to join in discussions unless there is a specific reason not to use talk pages Soliciting support other than by posting direct messages such as using a custom signature with a message promoting a specific position on any issue being discussed Neither of the 2 corp accounts have any say in controversial discussions and I would prefer they don t even comment on those My original request was to have them point out inaccuracies in the article of which they have sourced proof is wrong Items we have no idea they are incorrect unless someone pointed them out I gave appropriate notification in my RfC of which noone was yet responded about the controversial issues we are discussing