3RR violation by I m still here Here is how the 3 Revert Rule works I posted something CJCurrie reverted it 1 I reverted it 1 CJCurrie reverted it 2 I reverted it 2 CJCurrie reverted it 3 3 times Learn how to count Furthermore the information reverted was valid information with a documentation link that seemed to displease CJCurrie cur last 22 08 10 January 2006 Imstillhere m cur last 20 41 10 January 2006 Imstillhere Whether or not you think it was frivolous Richard Warman was charged and that is a real even that is documented and verifyable Whether or not the charges stuck is irrelevant cur last 20 38 10 January 2006 Imstillhere and a lot of the list of names in the list at the top are still in the complaint phase Complaint can be found here cur last 20 35 10 January 2006 Imstillhere You are in violation of the three revert rule You reverted me 3 times And the complaint is verifiable by contacting the CHRC cur last 20 26 10 January 2006 CJCurrie I repeat anyone can file a complaint and this is not in itself noteworthy btw you ll be in violation of the three revert rule if you return the section cur last 20 24 10 January 2006 Imstillhere cur last 20 22 10 January 2006 CJCurrie m Reverted edits by Imstillhere talk to last version by CJCurrie cur last 20 20 10 January 2006 Imstillhere cur last 19 12 10 January 2006 CJCurrie anyone can file a complaint I ve seen no evidence that this is credible and or noteworthy cur last 17 38 10 January 2006 Imstillhere m cur last 17 37 10 January 2006 Imstillhere Notice the history of changes I did not end up reverting a 3rd time but CJCurrie did I just posted links that are related and verifiable And by the way CJCurrie some of the names in the list of Warman s cases are just in the complaint phase as well so if you say anyone can file a complaint please feel free to remove the names from the list as well