Excuse me many previous editors including FA reviewers thought there had not been enough biographical info This article is not about his public life alone which hasn t yet merited a separate article other than Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul nor about his viability as a candidate see Ron Paul presidential campaign 2008 This is a biography and his private life ought to be weighted as fully as reliable sourcing and BLP permit I have not seen consensus anywhere that anyone s family should be constrained to names and categories and dates It is also properly placed in the article where else would it go Naturally a successful vibrant 50 year marriage is an exceptional claim fully sourced of course No hard feelings but I will probably revert much of this later under bold revert discuss looking forward to an interesting discussion I also have another source for additional of this If of course you have any reliably sourced negative information please state it neutrally here