No it wouldn t look the same because I would personally revert anything that was unsourced fancruft speculation before it got a chance to get in and weave itself into the article This is precisely what I ve done on Tekken 2006 film and whenever someone tries to add something unsourced I try to verify it myself and if I can t revert it goes usually with a note asking for a source going to the editor It sounds bad evil but it s better than what I ended up seeing people were quoting the old Tekken 2006 film as gospel saying it s cast list or storyline was accurate etc People were citing Wikipedia as a source elsewhere This is why we can t afford to have articles like this with large masses of unsourced material it flushes Wikipedia s credibility down the toilet talk e mail