Volunteer Marek stop pasting material that has no consensus without discussing it Moreover it is obvious you had not even familirised yourself with the value of that piece about Putin announcing new missiles as is clear from the fact you kept pasting it in the wrongly created duplicating section IF you really think that that news report has relevance to the article please expound your arguments hereinafter I shall be most glad to see them My view is that simply citing Putin on the missiles is quite meaningless without experts analysis or at least commentary This is a rather arcane and non transparent subject 40 new missiles announced mind you not put in service but merely announced as a plan So what Is this more than last year or fewer than prior What meaning does it have if it has any at all Russia still has a largely Soviet era nuclear arsenal ergo most of its ballistic missiles are technically past the expiry date and RF has been supposed to DEcommission hundreds of missiles each year for the past 20 years or so which is not to say it has been doing it Meanwhile as far as is publicly known it has been commissioning about half a dozen or a dozen on a good year Thus overall its nuclear arsenal has steadily shrunk So far there is no info that this decline has been reversed If SUCH news appears THAT ll be relevant and notable