You are right that I haven t read the judgement That is because I have a full time job which does not involve the law and Wikipedia is a hobby for me i e I don t care to make the time for it But that s the point articles like this would be helpful for a layman if they summarize the most important issues of the case up front which is what I suggested in the first place As it is the length and bearing of the article are discouraging for someone who is not a lawyer or law student I think Wikipedia policy is pretty clear in discouraging this approach Unfortunately for me I don t presently have the time to read the case text and write a decent summary of it which is something that would be better done by a scholar of the work anyway I can only urge you to do so and hope that you or another legal minded Wikipedian will come to agree Best of luck and keep up the good work