I got my first block i e not this one for keeping an article in line with a consensus that was established one month beforehand but now you re using an unresolved discussion from 19 months ago as the entire basis for your changes to Aesop That makes no sense The reason Aesop used BC AD for the last 19 months straight is not because nobody noticed my revert against consensus it was because Mzilikazi agreed on his talk page to stop changing the articles All five of us had agreed some of us implicitly rather than explicitly to leave both articles alone and that is indeed what occurred for many months By ignoring this commitment you re the one breaching consensus Dougweller