I would simply like to point out the aggressive tone in your reply to this message I posted on my own talk page It shows that you are stalking me on this website being as it on my own talk page My intent was to document this problem I didn t even post it on an open discussion page out of courtesy The mere tone of your reply displays that you have a personal problem with me Apparently you think I have some connection to Sante Kimes I have repeatedly denied this unproved accusation I am only a researcher of many well known court cases and my only concern was the tone and POV displayed on the Sante Kimes article I haven t even had much of a chance to read over the other articles listed on Wikipedia that I have researched because of the issues with this Sante Kimes page The article began going in a neutral point of view then you began to change the tone of the article I don t understand it other than you have a biased opinion I posted discussions on the discussions page regarding changes that I thought were needed You could have simply changed the article to say Sante Kimes is a convicted murder if the small change I made was that horrible to you I think the change to the lead you made is just out of spite because I said being a con artist is not a crime I actually meant it in a joking way not to criticize you but you apparently took it as an attack because of what you listed in the edit note in your reply and at around the same time you changed the lead info Had you posted on the discussion page about his first I would have talked with you about it The change I made to the lead was from a neutral POV I don t know how it was not As for saying American woman that is listed for several female criminals in their lead information on Wikipedia An example is Susan Smith one I happened to notice before changing the lead on the Sante Kimes article to American woman There you have it where I got American woman from I just don t understand where this hostility is coming from