18 22 July 2011 UTC I wasn t to know that what you had done was copyediting for FAC because you hadn t stated that you had made those changes on the FAC talk page I was getting confused because the reviewers are telling me to do something then I d go to change it and I couldn t find what it was that they wanted changed so I couldn t tell them that it has been done I m not saying I don t appreciate your help but a lot of what you had removed hadn t been listed as things that needed to be removed on the FAC talk page meaning that they clearly think it is fine as it is and was also information which I was told to include during the GAN process thus you was removing content which made it a GA in the first place such as in the lead I prefer to do things myself so I know what s been done and what needs to be done so i can keep track of things and I kinda feel like it is my responsibility to make the changes considering I nominated it that s just my opinion And I did assess each of your edits I looked at them all but it was easier for me to undo all of them so I could start from where I left off Don t take this offensively 999 The prose needs a huge overhaul The other reviewer left some minor suggestions but IMO it needs basically a rewrite with much of the same info but some details of limited value removed before it can be FA I was hoping to help but it sounds like there are some ownership issues and I don t care that much 15