The first reference is a dead link your second and third references use a different name than the current title Which means I count zero sites using your suggested name You may well be right but I m not about to make a change to a name and call it uncontroversial when I haven t yet seen a single example As I said before and you ve simply added confirmation the seem to be several variations of the spelling of the station name That s a good reason for posing a question in getting feedback on an article talk page This page isn t the right place to carry out that discussion If you are convinced that I miss reading this and think it is still uncontroversial go ahead and reinstate the template with the desired move and perhaps someone else will take care of it Talk