Seizures under the Trading with the Enemy Act 1942 Article phrasing seems contradictory First it says the companies were seized then it says there is no evidence that they were seized Which is it 02 27 28 Jul 2003 UTC Of course the companies were siezed It is common knowledge and it is well documented I m going to revert that disclaimer 16 45 Aug 28 2003 UTC Now there s no context at all to the seizures I don t think you have improved the article with your last edit Prescott Bush was not a Nazi collaborator sympathizer or anything of the sort but it sure seems that way now I merely wanted the phrasing to be cleaned up by someone more familiar with this it s not really common knowledge 04 33 Aug 29 2003 UTC The seizures under the Trading with the Enemy Act are matters of public record I ve added some innocuous biographical material I ve removed overseeing Nazi slave camps let s not get carried away here But patriarch of the Bush family seems a little fatuous for the man who was the son of a rich steel manufacturer who married a rich wife User Wetman