7 September 2010 UTC That Op ed is 90 about criticism of the US system and I m not sure that is relevant to this article Did you see where he says there s a pretty good argument that she should have been found innocent Fair enough Wikipedia articles are supposed to report facts about opinions Is his opinion notable That s a close call I m calling for quite a bit of discussion about what observers say about the trial He s saying he doesn t like the US response not that he agrees with the verdict The lengthy criticism section I put together wasn t necessarily intended to go in as is The idea is that it puts in one place content that I believe belongs in various places in the article Feel free to say what you think is wrong with what I wrote in that criticism section 13 25