The Kurdish peoples article has the same problem with this one Just because a few historians in the past suggest does not mean they are making assertions Hence trying to get away with naming the rare historians and saying belive Dozens of scholarly texts I ve ever read and perhaps hundreds assert that the medes have no direct cultural lineage to any modern day people It may only be surmised since no large migrations of peoples took place that the mede genetic make up is mixed with the peoples of the core population in the Zagroas mountains though still only a weak amalgamation and then diffuses out to the peoples in the surrounding area this includes the kurds but is not limited too them The medes are very obscure historically and they only had conquered a small area of modern day Kurdistan the people of that area then were considered foreign to the medes no doubt for a short period before Elam change all that Not even Iran can claim the Medes as their own I believe the mede kurd supposition is an exaggerated chauvinist connection with no genuine historical archeological or paleoanthropological support So please use sorced assertion not suppositions