There are a few flood models Hydroplate Catastrophic plate tectonics CPT Asteroid impacts note These flood models assume that the Genesis Flood is a fact The Hydroplate model has popular general public interest but few adherents among creationary scientists Rains come from water ejected from below crust Flooding is also by sinking of continents CPT is promoted by some PhD creationary scientists problems with it are noted by other equally degreed creationists Flooding is by tsunami from oceans rains are a side product Asteroid impacts are credited in two models Asteroid impacts w CPT and Asteroid impacts w vertical tectonics There are critics of both among creationary scientists Flooding is by tsunami from oceans rains are a side product Discussions of these models are found in creationary publications which are of course automatically rejected as FRINGE so So all you get are anti creationists misrepresenting creationists and claiming this is what creationists say No one cares what creationists actually say nor why It s all automatically pseudoscience because everyone knows that creationism is pseudoscience It doesn t matter if they are misrepresented or not They re FRINGE freaks anyway