Raymond arritt This is not an accident Some of the sections articles on Kambojas as being edited and altered by Debachmann are getting utterly confusing and more messier and I m afraid may lead to erroneous conclusions by the readers As he has started editing altering them en mass either he should improve the articles by editing them suitably so as to keep them clear logical and readable and at the same time also maintain keep intact their integrity and factuality let s us if he can do it or else I will have no alternative except to revert them back to their original versions For example the article Language and ethnicity of Kambojas in its current form which he has edited is utterly terrible I don t think he and other editors on kamboj articles of his kind are quite familiar with the Kamboj history so as to render them a justice Further please make a note that none of the information in any of articles on the Kambojas is a original research as Mr Debachmann continues to allege All the Kamboj information is in the books and only he and other people of his ilk may not be aware of it I have sent this note to him not with any intention to enter into a futile argument with him but simply to let him know that all the information on the Kambojas ancient mediaval or modern as inserted in any Kamboj related article here is well documented and has been taken from reliable references sources from notable scholars Cheers and have a nice day