No it should have been part of a request at the MoS centrally where a broader part of the community might have participated the discussion would have been advertised properly and the big picture would have counted for something not Mr Anderson s war of attrition against the MoS and his desire to see people do as they please at article level The move had no legiticimy IMO and still doesn t I don t acknowledge it Aside from this the breach of WP INVOLVED demands that Graeme Bartlett revert his move which was subject to a serious conflict of interest that is the only proper course of action talk