I m not pretending anything and what I did is not mass deletion it s replacement of POV material with reliable sources Before my latest edit the Shlomo Argov edit did not even make sense it couldn t since the latter half of the paragraph that completed the first one was removed and replaced by something unrelated What s more all the material inserted by me today about Israel s casus belli and the UN s commission s finding that Israel was responsible for the massacre was there before my latest edits and only got removed possibly by POV motivated authors this month You can see both edits were already there months ago Both edits are well sourced and after a cursory look at the editing history it can be seen whoever removed them did not give an explanation for their actions The casus belli edit has as a source David Hirst s book about Lebanese history The book was widely reviewed on mainstream media and praised It sits at the top of Wikipedia s reliable source chain And even though this isn t required the book is excerpted to show it supports the edit s content In case anyone s in doubt several other sources give support to Hirst s narrative Remove it all you like I too can revert you tomorrow again