Unofficial re review by Sasata At the request of the original nominator I ve having a look at the article again after changes have been made Referencing is now much better than before I ve condensed a couple of repeating citations I still believe the article needs to follow standard Wikiformat including a lead and division of text into sections with appropriate headers The argument that the article is not long enough to warrant separate sections highlights one of the article s deficiencies it doesn t give sufficient coverage to the information out there A search of the ISI Web of Knowledge Academic Database pulls up 76 research articles dating from 1991 2009 but only a tiny fraction of these are cited in the article Here are some research studies that I would expect to be cited in this article Thorson RM 1993 Postglacial offset along the Seattle fault Science 260 5109 825 826 Discusses data that confirms Holocene movement along the fault Karlin RE Abella SEB 1996 A history of Pacific Northwest earthquakes recorded in Holocene sediments from Lake Washington Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth 101 B3 6137 6150 Gives a geohistorical perspective on the fault and discussion of the secondary effects that may have been caused by the fault Dewberry SR Crosson RS 1996 The M D 5 0 earthquake of 29 January 1995 in the Puget lowland of western Washington An event on the Seattle fault Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 86 4 1167 1172 Analyses a 5 0 magnitude earthquake 25 km south of Seattle that is most certainly germaine to this article Thorson RM 1996 Earthquake recurrence and glacial loading in western Washington Geological Society of America Bulletin 108 9 1182 1191 Effects of glaciation deglaciation on earthquake recurrence and its effects on current paleoseismic approaches to determine recurrence frequency I could go on and on but I think you get the point There s a lot of research out there that hasn t been touched on in this article and for that reason it doesn t meet criteria 3 a it addresses the main aspects of the topic I think if you were to address some of this research the size of the article would swell up and section divisions would suggest themselves naturally And with section headers and beefed up text image placement is much easier I m not a fan of the outgoing links For example when I click on the outbound link local native legends I expect to be led to a page which discusses specifically the a yahos legend but instead end up on a general site about Indian legends and earthquakes Perhaps the a yahos legend is somewhere in one of those links but I shouldn t be expected to hunt around for it myself If there is a specific page which discusses a yahos then link to it directly and use a web citation template If not then this outbound link should be in the external links section or perhaps left out completely Similar arguments apply to the outbound link for Lidar based mapping that appears later I shouldn t have to go to an external site to find a definition that helps me understand the wiki article I hope this helps you on your quest to get this article to GA status Good luck