ACS The ACS clearly sets the standard in the world of cricket stats and history but I think some of the books have been weak eg Famous Cricketers a few clunkers here though a 100 were published Some of the Journal Articles were low on James quality out of 100 s A recent series of short autobiographies seems interesting though I believe the Alun Watkins book was described as anodyne Incidentally I believe a tension has grown up between Cricketarchive and the ACS Last AGM Oh and I am not a member but know several very well