April 2012 UTC I see we have a file back in its place I agree I do nt really see the need as there is link to the main article but nor do I see any harm in it being here However this is not the norm nor is there even an infobox field for it SO i guess i am impartial about its inclusion or exclusion but do think a good version should be selected if inclusion is the wish of the majority here on this article 01 12 22