If I may answer for Nancy she should feel free to correct me such a summary will be accused of being apologetic I saw it at earlier FACs where a significant number of editors thought there was not enough coverage of this issue This is a big deal There is not enough coverage Censorship One may note such sentiments are not wholly absent from this talk page either I read it as recentism as well as the whipping boy status the Church has in certain circles of western media I sympathize with Nancy and others that such a concise formulation would be a target at FA and an obstacle to achieving FA status However I would rather help produce a serious and reputable reference work than enable systematic bias of that type Yak