disrubtive edits and Abuse On the Tm page by the 7th and LB A selection of my so called disruptive behavior and abuse Evening morning afternoon i am sure you have read and discovered unlike some here that I am the 7thdrI My personal views can be found on that talk page I see you are new to the mediation process you have my sympathies getting this one Namaste Lotus Blossom ak the 7th talk Edit you may find the manner in which I address many of the other editors on the page strange The reason is they have stopped talking to me except in the third person A curious development but I thought if I returned the favor they might as they say in this neck of the woods get the hint Lotus Blossom ak the 7th talk thanks gentlemen Kbob talk Who on earth said I was a man The7thdr talk Who in heaven said you were a woman Kbob talk Patriarchal assumptions and language is something that I encounter everyday in my profession Kbob it would be nothing new here Your assumption seeming without question that I was male might be one to mediate on Please see Gender neutrality in English But you are forgiven you are after all less the result of your genitalia then you are a dominate form of socialization Anyway let us stop lest you lead me down to a discussion of assumptions language professions and gender roles Perhaps I shall change by avatars name here just for you The7thdr talk How s that Better Lotus Blossom ak the 7th talk So I guess you are telling me that you are a woman and resent being called a gentlemen OK I stand corrected Thanks for the heads up Kbob talk 18 37 3 August 2009 UTC I suggest that this article would be best focused on the meditation technique and organizational aspects should be moved to another article Will Beback talk I agree Uncreated talk I agree although if it is to be included here I think in the Relgion section as it does seem to support the idea that TM is a religion The7thdr talk We may not like it but this is a celebrity focused world The involvement of celebrities in TM probably did more to promote it adoption than all of the scientific studies combined Both deserve space in the article Will Beback talk This what i said before the popularity section was added but it was ignored Now it is in place I think it makes interesting reading Like it or I do have to sadly agree with WILL Whether we like it or not celebrity is important Indeed it was the TM authors of this piece that argued this section be added It is now a little late to complain about something which TM argued to include when it appears that many of the celebrities especially the dead ones its website and promotional material is so keen to suggest endorsed the technique may have actually had a very different view keithbob it is a personal website from an expert in his field just as OJ is Actually it s an authors page a much different thing but hey I ll play along if you want It was included so the reader could actually read the full interview However if you wish to cite a published source for the same interview you are obviously unaware of the author you could cite the following just as easily Conversations with Kurt Vonnegut By Kurt Vonnegut William Rodney Allen Where the full text is also included Alas not all of it is available to GoogleBooks preview The7thdr talk I agree with Will and we should remove the recent additions where people are quoted with negative remarks It just makes the whole popularity section unbalanced Uncreated talk Not sure what part of WILLs statements you are agreeing to uncreated Until a balance is archived where it does seem that the people cited are endorsing the produced I do not see how you can remove the recent edits KV was esp