fair enough its a fair point but why oh why did i do so much fulfilling all of the wikpedia guidlines for personal content editting style correct sourcing and referencing wiki formatting etc months tireless work on an article which was to be so casually consigned to the dustbin however much i respect your views a redirect to the clairvoyance article would however be entirely meaningless one is not exchangeable for the other like cheese isn t milk etc covering the groundwork general background to establish a context for understanding extra sensory phenomena in general needed to be done and it might as well happen at the Clairsentience page for now the reason i did it there was because fundamental doubts were being expressed about my earliest article s conents were concerned implicitly announcing that the background for understanding extra sensory phenomena in general had not been done which was as remember saying to you a few weeks ago the frustrating context which motivated the writing of the second article with all of its references to the background research of brennan lylle mckenna bohm wilber sheldrake etc because this background had to be established before any specifics about clairsentience could even be begun to be aproached thus the many weeks days and months of toil which has been endured to even get this background matereal into a wikpedia format and guidlines shape all of which criterea have been met or at leasst were until the finished product was mindlessly deleted the new additional altered states matereal was a tentative beginning into finding a context for tentatively describing the specifics of the clairsentience phenomena itself but agian it was trashed with no thought or care