the basis for removing the del ponte material is that she signed the june 2013 report which was agnostic about chemical weapons having been used by rebel forces she was premature speaking out kind of thing the report supersedes her earlier talk you remain agnostic but sellstrom and the report came to its conclusions poor theories he called the theories of the rebels Saudis turks did it crowd poor theories pushed by whoever are poor theories you may have weighed hersh in the balance and found him credible full stop as a person you ve vetted if hersh writes about ghouta sarin chemistry diplomacy baseball he is credible about anything and everything for you but so what for the article its fringe imo he is fringe or poor theory pusher if you don t like hersh called fringe on ghouta so all the intelligence officers in the world that sy hersh hob nobs with all the mandarin know alls all the knowers of super secret stuff of rat lines and false flags haven t persuaded sellstrom have they and don t you think he is credible more credible on chemical attacks than hersh who takes hersh seriously on ghouta RT and my goodness hershs articles are referenced and quoted anyhow all over the article last I saw he is not being gagged is he