i m enjoying the holiday the nice thing about beating your head against the wall it feels good when you stop why should i put up with the sons of betacommand when i can work at source with charles matthews i am not alone just go look at all the veteran editors at other projects who won t come back look at all the expert editors who stopped editing because they were bitten this attitude that editors are a dime a dozen is a limiting factor in the quality of wikipedia just so we re clear this is about interpretation of policy not policy itself we have editors nominating for deletion because a fair use image would make it harder to email and get a free image we have editors nominating for deletion because in the era of digital cameras a free image of the recently dead must exist look harder we have editors nominating for deletion because an image in a book exists go scan the book even it was printed in 1930 and the photographer is unknown this image would be challenged at commons since the source and copyright status is unknown we have editors nominating for deletion because the newspaper photo could be a commercial source although no proof of commercial source exists we have admins removing fair use images from articles without discussion then letting the bot delete the new orphan image i m curious why i should agree to anything what is my motivation as a counteroffer i will agree to a 6 month topic ban if a permanent interaction ban is agreed to with editor B1 and B2 they will not comment on my talk they will not nominate my uploads since they do so little work in article space i can stay away from them if the policy is so clear another admin can handle it and it will remove even the perception that a personal agenda is being pursued here turning the tables since this is the popular sophistical trick why would i want to come back what can you offer me to edit here again i ve quit aversive leadership for money why would i want to put up with it for free 1