I can t defend the vandal so to speak but this article has problems The first line refers to neo futurism as a 21st century movement and yet the gallery has many structures that were done during the 20th The St Louis Gateway Arch for instance is OLD I was brought here by the article of Buckminster Fuller and he died in 1983 If you can t tell us what century something is from this does create a credibility problem Also and this is just personal musing the nomenclature is problematic and recursive How many times are we going to reinvent futurism If I built a building today and designed it to look as futuristic as possible would that be neo neo futurism