This isn t pure WP OR WP COATRACK fits better I guess I called it basically WP OR in my edit summary for that reason but it s essentially OR to suggest that al Qaeda has something to do with the investigation even if it s not stated outright The insertion of that material creates the appearance that al Qaeda is somehow linked to or related to the investigation which no sources support That s what I was calling basically OR even if it indeed isn t quite what WP OR means I should ve used a different term Of course we do original research to create articles and determine notability in the first place but inserting a random similarity goes beyond the scope of what that research covers The source may have said the characteristics are similar but not that it s related to this incident or its investigation rfc diff