Opinion that the judge s report is biased That s not an opinion it s an obvious fact That s the whole purpose of the report The finding of the court was guilty and the report attempts to justify the court s findings The prosecution s argument and the judge s conclusion are one and the same You can t get any more biased than that That s the reason for the WP BLP prohibition on use of court records to support assertions about a living person And anything in the report that it claims is evidence or circumstance that leads to the guilty conclusion is an assertion about a living person Please step back and look at it logically Lack of an alternate RS is NOT justification to demand that you be allowed to use a prohibited biased source That would be the same as someone else demanding to use injusticeinpeurgia org as a RS unless YOU can provide an alternate for the same information