No personal attacks I was not personally attacking you just pointing out that the good folks at CircLeaks have amassed an impressive range of information about you which calls into question your suitability to contribute to something known as an encyclopedia The problem with Wikipedia is that it extends the principle of the liberation of knowledge so far as to allow people who ought not to be writing encyclopedia articles to write them The fact is that you would not be asked to contribute to an academically rigorous publication such as Encyclop dia Britannica You do not write academically rigorous articles it is well known that you push a very particular slant but for some reason you continue to be allowed to do it