I don t think the problem is with including Latin as an example but rather that after veni vidi vici it gives a literal translation as came saw conquered and then an idiomatic translation that reads I came etc The problem is that came saw conquered would not be considered a literal translation by any Latin scholar or teacher I am a Latin teacher and I would expect the pronoun expressed in an English rendering since it s clearly expressed in the Latin The literal translation implies that Latin doesn t mark person and number on verbs which is of course false Now that I look at the other examples it looks like this problem pervades the article Someone is trying to recreate the effect of such languages I call them pro drop in English The problem is that you can t create the effect in English which is one of the points of the article i e English is not a null subject language came saw conquered does not create the effect that a Latin speaker would feel upon hearing veni vidi vici in fact I came I saw I conquered is as close as one can get to create the effect of this phrase in English