Verifiability Wikipedia Verifiability states that 3 The obligation to provide a reputable source is on editors wishing to include information not on those seeking to remove it Until such time that this policy is met the section currently entitled Scientist should be removed for lack of verifiability coupled with reliance on weasel phrasing as the support for the entire section This is further born out by the cite your sources section that states If the article has many unsourced statements that have been there a long time you may request sources on the talk page before removing them unless the article or information is about a living person in which case remove the unsourced information emphasis mine This is mandatory policy Please adhere to it until such time as editors can provide sources and or rewrite the section with appropriate sourcing Thanks The information that you are complaining about isn t about a person It s about critics supporters You are wilfully misinterpreting policy Please stop That is an incorrect assessment The unsourced information is about Sarfati That it is attributed to anon critics supporters and is unsourced is the reason that it is unverifiable Can you provide sources for the assertions If not it should be deleted according to the verifiability policy Also I respectfully request that this discussion be about content rather than personal commentary directed at mei e willfully Thank you No you are wrong What there could be libel 1 The anonymous assertions are unsourced and 2 the anonymous assertions are well anonymous This alone puts it in the range between gossip and libel Furthermore as there are no sources Wikipedia Verifiability is violated Please tell me how you believe I am wrong With all the text on this talk page no one has supplied even one source that verifies the anonymous assertion cite your sources If you doubt the accuracy or origin of an unsourced statement that has been in an article for a long time delete it or move it to the talk page Can you improve the section including sources and lack of anonymous weasel phrases rather than reverting it back to this original disputed form Verifiability Wikipedia Verifiability states that 3 The obligation to provide a reputable source is on editors wishing to include information not on those seeking to remove it Until such time that this policy is met the section currently entitled Scientist should be removed for lack of verifiability coupled with reliance on weasel phrasing as the support for the entire section This is further born out by the cite your sources section that states If the article has many unsourced statements that have been there a long time you may request sources on the talk page before removing them unless the article or information is about a living person in which case remove the unsourced information emphasis mine This is mandatory policy Please adhere to it until such time as editors can provide sources and or rewrite the section with appropriate sourcing Thanks The information that you are complaining about isn t about a person It s about critics supporters You are wilfully misinterpreting policy Please stop That is an incorrect assessment The unsourced information is about Sarfati That it is attributed to anon critics supporters and is unsourced is the reason that it is unverifiable Can you provide sources for the assertions If not it should be deleted according to the verifiability policy Also I respectfully request that this discussion be about content rather than personal commentary directed at mei e willfully Thank you No you are wrong What there could be libel 1 The anonymous assertions are unsourced and 2 the anonymous assertions are well anonymous This alone puts it in