Is someone disputing the neutrality of the article or the style I don t see the neutrality problem The text is a bit florid but I don t agree with Ipsenaut s evaluation I m more concerned about how much was cribbed directly from the 1911 EB Even though it s PD the material should still be rewritten for Wikipedia People can go to the 1911 EB to read the 1911 EB We shouldn t just be reprinting the 1911 EB here Surely someone has written noteworthy commentary on Petronius since 1911