I see that you don t want to discuss it THere are sources other than Overlawyered which would probably be reliable and a criticism section be written that isn t inflammatory and longer than the rest of the article When I first saw this article I believe written by you the whole point of it was as an attack This lawyer is not infamous He is not the target of an investigation that I know of if he is please cite where I have asked you repeatedly to just discuss and you are unwilling to do so I do not have time for your games