The question isn t about due weight between sources though It s about due weight with regards to information To take a step back clearly this was basically a brutal murder and within the context of British society you would have to be a lunatic not to condemn it unequivocally It s always possible to dig up a lunatic if you want to interview one but it doesn t change the basic consensus about whether the attack was a good or a bad thing It s the consensus that the lead of the article ought to reflect The views of people like Anjem Choudary the Westboro Baptist Church or David Icke don t really have a place in the lead sections of articles about significant contemporary events