The problem is the lead of the article suggests the facts are not in dispute yet we have the same paper that started the claims NY Times also running an article that says the S Strategy is a myth That alone should justify the claim alledged Furthermore I see that previous attempts to add references that dispute the claim that the events are true have been removed For example why was the Revision as of 05 01 31 December 2014 revision undone Adding a section that disputes the claims is justified in an article such as this 129 59 79 123