4 September 2014 UTC My apologies for not responding to your previous post about this When I saw it I was short of time and left it to deal with later and then forgot about it I would have restored the last incarnation of the deleted article not earlier versions which contained copyright infrignements and moved it to your userspace However the article has now been re created and since there doesn t seem to be anything significant in the deleted version that is not also in the new article so there doesn t seem to be much point in restoring it now I have corrected a couple of grammatical mistakes in the new article Apart from that the most important thing needing to be done to the article in my opinion is checking the reference citations and moving them to appropriate parts of the article rather than all in a list at the end The editor who uses the pseudonym 09 38