A week at the Tito article Hi Guys I know that what I said to you in my outburst the one that earned me a weekend in the cooler was wrong Of course it was I apologise to you for that A week later however I think you can see what we are up against here in the Balkan domain AndreaFox entered a post at ANI which superficially looked genuine You all supported him her With hindsight it can be seen that the edit s entered that DIREKTOR and I opposed rejected reverted were appallingly POV and supported by a desperate scratching around for internet sources that when found ranged from the neo fascist Suni IHR to the vaguely circumstantial Meares the translator I personally have no doubt that Tito was no angel he was a flawed human being just as we all are but I will not stand idly by while POV monsters attempt to abuse our Wikipedia to fight the good fight That s why I was unacceptably angry a week ago but I hope that the developments of the last week enable you all to see what we face here I speaking only for myself think that the Tito article in question dwells way too much on the WWII period with not enough on the major period that should be covered namely his time as head of state