RfA commentary Strikerforce This is truly bizarre I replied at Rami R s RfA where I made the point that your challenge was simply clueless of course supporters are entitled to challenege opposers and it was simply odd to ask why anyone would not do that Now in the above you tell me I m implying bad faith when indeed I m only saying I might be acting in bad faith I m not implying anyone else is and a simple reading makes that very clear It s not that complex mate disapointed you can t see so I ve re read my commentary and anyone with en 2 en 3 would get that as you don t mention your proficency I assume you re en n so that makes it even more surreal Chat