Packerfansam Better to continue the discussion here I think The ANI in which we both participated was closed out in June or so with no action based on her assurances that she understood the nature of the problems she d occasioned and a promise to try to stop You ll recall that she had been removing references from articles to non Christian religions and thought sexual orientation and sex generally among other things and while I was the one to raise this initially at ANI it is certainly fair to say that I was not the only one to be troubled by these edits As the matter wrapped up I was skeptical that she appreciated the problem she described it along the lines of offending one or two users or that she d actually quit the problematic editing but after being characterized as overzealous on the point I withdrew She has slowed but certainly not quit her POV editing A partial list of such edits since then includes July 9 At Christianity without explanation she recast the Criticism and apologetics section as Arguments and apologetics and removed sourced critical commentary by Nietzsche Bertrand Russell and current Jewish and Muslim theologians as well as a sourced observation by an atheist that some Bible stories may be based on myth July 30 At Trois Rivi res removed without explanation the identification of a Canadian Liberal Party politician as liberal as well as a reference to another person s being the first Jew elected to public office in the British Empire August 15 She erased without comment mention of Hugh Hefner s attendance at the Art Institute of Chicago August 18 She removed proper and wikilinked mention of a notable alum who is best known and described as an LGBT activist October 15 At Ted Turner she removed a reliably sourced quote from Turner declaring himself to be agnostic claiming it was contradicted by info elsewhere in article when the excised information was more recent than the contradictory text and indeed nicely illustrated the point in the source itself which is that Turner has waffled on the issue over the years Here too I am not the only editor to remain concerned see this Talk page entry from September I agree that the party school edit to the University of Wisconsin is in the larger picture kind of a silly thing but between her registered account and the IP she sometimes edits from she has made the same edit at least four times now see May 15 June 13 October 3 in addition to today s And to be clear she s not removing the party school material but just the perfectly good citation to Playboy Indeed in her October 3 entry she updated the party school rankings to 2015 and went out and found a different source to insert in Playboy s stead So I take your point that maybe this particular edit is a trivial thing to template her on but she has continued her practice albeit slowed of idiosyncratic unexplained or deceptively described removal of content for reasons that can only be explained as in furtherance of a personal point of view I don t think that such editing should pass without at least occasional comment and that s what I did