Obviously people will read a book longer than 32 kb I m not talking about book readership I m talking about encyclopaedia readership You shouldn t be writing something here that s attempting to compete with book readership We could argue the demographics inconclusively all day but I am still quite certain that there are really not many people out there who want to read 60 kb of encyclopaedia article about a porn star 95 of the web being porn doesn t actually mean there are lots of people out there crying out for a lengthy pseudo encyclopaedic article on their favourite porn star You seem to be saying that you have to write a long article for it to become an FA This is not the case The shortest are considerably under 20 kb Wouldn t you trade this massive article with star for five smaller ones with star Each of which being more likely to actually be read and appreciated