Regardless of how relevant or not relevant climbing the mountain is that paragraph constitutes important historical background material as to previous occupations on the mountain If you move it around you are going to severely mess up the flow of the section for fairly little benefit Yeah it focuses much on the summit and upper flanks of Mauna Kea In this case there is no escaping it There are sources to one and not to the other moving everything around has so far only messed up flow and made it hard to read Nowiki s idea of verifiability based on other Wikipedia articles is a confligation of WP SOURCE do not use Wikipedia as a source and would be immediatly removed come the FAC All in all the best course of action is to simply agknowledge the biase and move on from there The section is hardly the most important one in the article anyway Mar