Not every sentence needs a citation one citation can be provided for several sentences What you are proposing is to completely delete everything from the article representing the view of majority of Iranians and the government that the elections were not rigged and leave the article with only green movement propaganda Firtsly I want to make it clear there was no real proof at all the proof provided were a comparison of Ahmadinejad s 2005 first round results per province in which 7 major candidates competed and none had a majority with his 2009 results per province which ofcourse showed and increase for Ahmadinejad votes everywhere and than the claim that this should be impossible which proves Mousavi won A claim by Mousavi office that the actual results leaked and showed him with 19 milion votes and Ahmadinejad with only 5 milion votes which contradicts the green movement s claims that the eelection results weren t counted at all because the results were in supposedly much to quickly which is their other major proof that the results were rigged Another proof is the myth of all Azeris would automaticly vote for Mousavi disregaring all politics and voting purely on ethnic basis which should prove that the election was rigged as Ahmadinejad won in Tabriz but at the same time the Persians are not gon na vote ethnicly for some reason unknown to us infact they were all gon na vote for Mousavi the non Persian Other than these flawed theories presented by the Green movement you ve got a few claims by them that anonymous government workers have admitted the election was rigged the problem being that none of this can ever ben confirmed and the assumption that the fact that 100 000 people demonstrated in a city of 14 000 000 metropolian area although nowhere else in the country the Greens could get over 1000 people should make everyone believe that it is sooo obviously clear tha a vast majority of Iran s 74 milion people support this man And all of these weak claims are mentioned throughout all articles related and even articles hardly related to the elections and or green movement Now if this is the only proof they have which it is why would pro American governments and the media in their country s take it all so seriously Simple politics are politics There has been a smear campaign against Ahmadinejad in western media ever since he got in power and against Iran ever since the revolution because the Iranian politics do not coincide with American geo strategic interests Why do you think their camera crews prior to the elections only interviewed university students in Northern Tehran which spoke fluent English while no other city region or population group s views were ever shown on American news Because they wanted to create an image that Mousavi is more populair while infact he wasn t as the fully legitimate results show