WP OVERLINKING policy on Wikipedia Generally a link should appear only once in an article but if helpful for readers links may be repeated in infoboxes tables image captions footnotes and at the first occurrence after the lead If an article of 1 000 lines has a link repeated on line 600 there is no objection to keep te second link A link repeated three times in the same paragraph is just plain overkill Any undesirable future edits removal of templates should be adressed by closely monitoring your watchlist not placing an excessive amount of duplicate links is to keep everything in a format that is uniform with everything In my opinion that s just impossible Imperial versus metric inch versus foot and inch alphabetic versus historical order etc Using other units for Railgauge templates than its corresponding categories and article titles makes it harder to recognise a particular Railgauge when editing or reading text especially for people accustomed to metric systems When the list of track gauges navbox track gauges article titles and categories all mention 3 ft 6 in it is odd to use the devious 42 in RailGauge template Moreover the Railgauge templates are only for conversion purposes and not intended for sorting lists by size or alphabet Uniformity for the sake of uniformity serves no purpose Taking WP NPOV in particular WP BALASPS in consideration Rail transport in Disney Parks is not less or more significant than a randomly chosen rapid transit rail system famous heritage railway abandoned railway or extensively used common carrier railway There are numerous other railways transporting huge numbers of passengers preserving steam locomotives or having other notable features And these aren t listed in the see also section either I chose the spamming qualification for all your linking behaviour not only the Disneyland links see the section header