3 January 2010 UTC The inclusion of the text could well be incitement from those biased against the subject But I think what it is at its base is a misreading of what can and should go into a Wikipedia article It would appear that those wanting this text to remain seem to believe that any tangential utterances can be added just so long that they can be documented If that were true the entirety of the Wikipedia would become at risk for unraveling as a useful reference for gaining knowledge of the various subjects contained herein I haven t reviewed all the December changes to express an opinion about them Talk Work 18 50