The problem with the material is WP NPOV and WP UNDUE There is also no reliable sourcing to say that this is significant to Palin s biography I generally tune out after hearing someone complain about whitewashing and this is no exception Accusations of bad faith being a Palin supporter and threats to edit war retaliate are rather disruptive This seems to be a WP SPA editing wikipedia solely on election related articles If the brief description of the AIP is inaccurate please feel free to write a better succinct identification of the party However an extended description of the platform of a party this person left 12 years ago is unwarranted seems like an obvious coatrack Again per my comments above if the mainstream reliable sources begin to say this is a serious scandal we can report it as such In the meanwhile a reliable source here or there does not mean it is a significant issue to her biography particularly not considering that there is a separate article about the party and yet another article about her political positions As of this moment there seem to be 36 000 current google news stories about her and only 13 mention the AIP That s a very cursory analysis but it supports what seems to be the weight of the sources it is simply not a big issue It may be soon but not now