Discussing recombination Recently I noticed that this article uses genetic recombination to refer to recombination that occurs during in meiosis and brings about genetic diversity among organisms This isn t necessarily correct genetic recombination can also refer to non homologous end joining NHEJ or V D J recombination neither of which to my knowledge occur during meiosis or produce heritable genetic diversity among organisms To account for that I think it would be helpful to replace instances of genetic recombination with homologous recombination the type of genetic recombination to which this article refers What are others thoughts on this The only drawback I could see would be the slightly less reader friendly word homologous This however seems clarified by the first sentence in the Sex and recombination section to invoke the phrase In the related process of genetic recombination sexual organisms can also exchange DNA between two matching chromosomes If the inaccessibility of the word homologous were in fact a drawback I think it would be more than compensated for by the greater accuracy of the information being presented to the reader Yesterday I tried introducing this change but was reverted In the summary of that reversion the editor noted why be less general homologous excludes translocations duplications fusions etc I ve offered my rationale for being specific just above but was curious about the second sentence If homologous recombination excludes translocations duplications fusions etc then is that somehow accounted for by other types of genetic recombination like NHEJ or V D J recombanation To my understanding it is a failure of homologous recombination in meiosis that produces heritable chromosome translocations fusions and gene duplications I think you are correct being more accurate is better since the sentence does refer specifically to matching chromosomes I ve reworded this to state In a related process called homologous recombination sexual organisms exchange DNA between two matching chromosomes I ve added the idea of general recombination to the previous section adding Mutations can involve large sections of DNA becoming duplicated usually through genetic recombination Charles Darwin film too controversial for religious America A British film about Charles Darwin has failed to find a US distributor because his theory of evolution is too controversial for American audiences according to its producer That s a laugh Please don t try to make evolution look like it s a helpless victim being attacked by a bunch of religious nuts The theory of evolution does have many loopholes but America is not religious by any means I m shocked that an American producer turned down the film Preceding unsigned comment added by talk contribs Sorry I just don t see how evolution can be a controversial topic evolution is all around us simple as that People who tend to object to such basic fundamental facts of life tends not to understand the depth of the topic to the point of understanding it but rather the shallow aspect to justify their lack of understanding Not everyone is good at science so some people would tend to take the shallow route of critizing something if they don t understand Example I m terrible at pre calculus so I critize the aspect of pre calculus to justify my understanding see where I m getting at Not relevant here The Evolution article is not about Charles Darwin the film is not about evolution and there is an entirely separate page for the creation evolution controversy Please don t post sociological trivia on the Talk page of a biology article Also evolutionary theory does not have loopholes