I would say yes that s what he s saying since there is an asymptote there Which brings me to a question for you guys You say x 0 for f x 1 x but you would say x 0 for f x 1 1 x since x 0 is the only way you ll get a value of 1 I m not trying to be difficult I m really trying to see it but I just see too many flaws and this causes my disbelief in 999 1