Teleological Western Bias in the lead I hate to be a douche but in the lead the word purpose in conjunction with significance is used exclusively At first glance this may be nothing to notice But purpose is a word denoting teleological ontology What have you there is an entire world of outside of economic growth related constraints for some of us and this world eventually ends up as a more more more consumerist struggle So we go back back to the world where purpose was implicit where the question why is not brought back into light A world of games and so forth So the Western conceptions of growth hit the Confucian conceptions of stability and what I m trying to say is that the lead needs some more Eastern influence The word purpose stings as almost evangelical doesn t it You don t see any evangelical Buddhists do you Its difficult to tease out but there is something there In the name of neutrality may both sides be presented To wit the lead needs yes I m saying it a little bit more Yin