I did not file any retaliatory complaints that is a blatant lie he filed one after I simply left him a warning on his user talk page They both certainly are in violation of the tree revert rule they were section blanking previously added content which I had nothing to do with the entire section about September 11th is gone now I never even added that all I did in the process was add citations I also did not file any reports as retaliation as I said I intended to file my incident report before I knew they would go and file them as well you can infere this by the report Wikipedia Administrators noticeboard Incidents Lone Gunmen I only asked for administrative oversight to editing It appears that none of you know the three revert rule wherein I added disputed content which was never even properly discussed or voted upon by other editors simply reverted 3 times by the other editors 72 72 240 141