First I did not change the name of an AFD I changed the name of the article Articles are open for editing during AFD and people objected to the name I improved the article by changing the name which no one seemed to like Obviously one should then change the name of the AFD to correspond to the article For you to call that disruptive demonstrates a profound misunderstanding of the process If I had changed it to something silly that would be different but I doubt there s an editor here who disputes that was an improvement Second I did not attack Aaron in it I described his actions I factually said he did not do a b c I also described it as a preposterous attempt to circumvent standard procedure It was Honestly I ve been around for years and I ve never seen anything remotely like that nomination Now I don t think he s trying to make a point I think he s dead serious and that s the scary thing I also don t think the others are trying to make a point I think they re abusing process Morton is handing out freaking barnstars to the little coterie that votes with him How is that less offensive than me making links to contributions The fact is that everyone here does look at contributions by certain people and I m just not so fake as to hide it Will be now obviously They ve got a little hit page that conservatives watchlist for which article to AFD next Then they swarm on it to make it look like a snowball Anyway s I have no intention of conducting an RFC As you surely must know those are a complete waste of time I do have an intention of participating with well reasoned commentary on the same AFD s based on the same sources they use Third I did not evade the block in any substantive way I simply left a message on your page Did I go mess with Scribner Did I go edit No I did not I simply asked you to explain your absurd comment that I had disrupted AFD And btw I d like to thank Tbeatty for being non ridiculous Grown people running off to adminstrators to whine about a humourous though barbed response to a silly template is ridiculous Perhaps they re not grown though in which case I guess it s ok and I should stop picking on the children I don t dispute that I invited a block I m just frankly surprised that anyone cared enough to tattle Derex