5 January 2008 UTC Check the editing history most if not all of the edits to the side of definite have come from homosexually aligned people and only given partial assent by some heterosexuals whom are willing to give in to the speculative POV that you find as factual and want a fight to the death over How come you people have no grasp of the royal court or politics Why involve yourself then except for tendentious editing You only dig a deeper hole by trying to make this article toe the line of homosexual propaganda which has unbelievably assimilated homophobic oaths about the king and turned him into a homosexual according to your own minds These are observations not allegations The editing history is clear Furthermore because your collectively unscrupulous behaviors such as using logical fallacies and mob mentality of your Wikiproject to force the issue we have adolescents coming here to vandalize the article with fag jokes You turn a great study into infamy all by exaggeration of scandal and not even the real issues at hand which were so critical to the events which happened in 17th century England 24 255 11 149 16 33