June 2010 UTC Flori does not say that all contemporary historians say that Richard was homosexual What Flori says is my translation This Richard s homosexuality is however quite generally accepted at present by contemporary historians in line with fashion the French original is Celle ci est pourtant assez g n ralement accept e aujourd hui par les historiens contemporains la mode aidant Flori provides a footnote for this statement with references to several authors Since this article very carefully documents its sources with citations to specific pages it still seems to that the text in the article should correspond to the citation Gillingham says that the other historians are wrong Flori disagrees with Gillingham Your are correct to note that the text was ambigous I have now corrected it 12 28 13