28 December 2006 UTC Forgive me if I try to be brief It s very early in the morning here and I haven t slept yet It s understandable that you didn t know of any active projects connected to WP CVG when you made your proposal It s not as if any of us are being paid to be here are we Now that I know why we weren t told I don t have a problem with that part I ll read over the current proposal sometime today I didn t respond to your comments at WP MK because the previous discussion of the MK template split which I was involved in raised issues brought up in your proposal that s how we were told I believe that the main concern we had was over the ease of navigation so the changes were reverted I still have the same concerns about your proposal Other WP MK members may still share this opinion have other issues or are not bothered That s why I ve asked you to discuss your plans for the MK template with the rest of us before you proceed Personally I agree with the aesthetic changes you re proposing but I disagree with the severe limit on links in the template The characters article you linked to was a good start but it does no harm to link to some more categories that are related to the series if only to make navigation more convenient That s all that I m prepared to say while I m half asleep but if you have any more questions for me personally I ll respond when I m able to 07 16