Myself and the Sante Kimes Wikipedia article I would like to set some things straight about myself and the Sante Kimes article 1 I am NOT Sante Kimes 2 I am NOT a relative of Sante Kimes 3 I DO NOT HAVE or EVER HAD an attorney contacting Wikipedia This is on outrageous claim I AM a researcher of well known court cases and have researched the Sante Kimes case in the past SUBJECT BAN 1 Since an administrator asked me to voluntarily not edit anything on the Sante Kimes article I have complied 2 If those interesting in my edits to the Sante Kimes article please just see the article s edit history Since making editing mistakes on my FIRST EVER edits on Wikipedia I have complied with the appropriate editing guidelines Namely Posting in the discussion page of the article about ANY large edits I felt appropriate for the article Placing details and reason for the edit in editing tags Please see the article s editing history to see that the only edits I have made were to correct dates spelling mistakes adding verifying tags and making small corrections to the article that were needed Furthermore I gave full details for the changes I made in the editing notes Please see the article s editing history to confirm this 3 The only edit that I made that was in debate was the article s lead info I do contend that the current lead starting with American felon was placed there as an action of spite by that editor The lead I placed WAS of a neutral POV factual WITH EXACT dates for the named convictions and was supported by references The current lead does not state the dates for when these conviction took place Furthermore I had placed American woman in the lead which IS in the lead of various other female criminal s articles who arguable allegedly committed WORSE crimes than Sante Kimes is accused of committing If it s appropriate for those articles why is it not appropriate for this article In closing I DID follow editing guidelines for the Sante Kimes article after I learned what was acceptable editing Furthermore I discussed at length in the article s discussion page about changes that I felt WERE needed Yet I NEVER took it upon myself to edit those issues until an agreement could be reached I would like to point out that those changes have yet been agreed upon and I HAVE NOT made any edit in regard to those issues Therefore that demonstrates that I am following the editing guidelines Because of an apparent personal problem an administrator has with me Which is the same editor I was in dispute with on this article s discussion page They have asked me to voluntarily not edit the article or most outrageously not EVEN post on the article s discussion page to discuss the issues with this article How is this not considered conflict of interest I have complied with that request even though I have not yet read or been advised as to what guideline I was in violation of in regard to the Sante Kimes article or it s discussion page