Adult child sex child sexual abuse Copied from WP ANI ohio I ve asked this question before but I ve never had an understandable explanation How is the article a POV fork If it s been explained previously just point me to the diff I ve seen plenty of people say it s a POV fork but what I see is a value neutral etic approach to a topic that s as old as humanity itself Even if the title is POV the content can be used in other articles so why delete it ohio Adult child sex is a euphemism for child sexual abuse and any article titled Adult child sex is prima facie assumed to be apologistic for child sexual abuse Exactly as if someone took an article Nazi genocide and retitled or made a fork entitled Nazi demographic adjustments We understand that you don t agree with this but if you still don t understand it then you had better look to yourself Exactly as Hero said As a contemporary example Ethnic Cleansing and Genocide One is just a fancy name for the other 03 41 UTC 6 Mar 08 I don t see the logic of that Adult child sex the term goes no further than plain description I can see where some editors were trying to insert POV material about child sexual abuse into the article but I don t see how it logically follows that the term itself becomes a euphemism for child sexual abuse The term itself can advance no agenda It is materially different from the genocide demographic adjustments example which may invoke Godwin s law As for VP s example ethnic cleansing means something different from but related to genocide just as adult child sex does with child sexual abuse The repeated assertion has been made that the term itself is POV Where is the POV in it Since this seems not to be much of an AN I question I invite replies at my talk page ohio