As one final point seriously why not just open up an RFC I think that categories should only be used when they re objectively accurate rather than possibly accurate accurate subject to a specific interpretation contrary to first party references but more or less in line with what more third party sources believe than do not etc Either 139 57 240 18 agrees or at least thinks this version is equally valid For the sake of argument I m going to assume that Diego won t approve of swapping in one LGBT category for another even four people still isn t really that much Particularly since people tend to ignore that other stuff exists rule and might end up using this as a precedent So why not do an RFC Or heck just ask for advice at the village pump I d argue that even four people agreeing wouldn t be a fantastic consensus So how can three or four people disagreeing form one 72 88 42 215