Ok I will Just a question since it s about correcting IPA transcriptions according to en wikipedia itself in Help IPA for Italian and Labiodental nasal sources are already provided if I do what you said I ll have to do it a from now on and b on every single page where somebody has modified an IPA transcription such as that page whose history I linked Right Or wrong If I m right no problem If I m wrong Then why making distinctions between Pittura infamante and anything else Why must I add a source in the article instead of indicate it in the edit summary there but not anywhere else That s what seems absurd to me Preceding unsigned comment added by 194 145 208 20 Wikipedia is a collaborative site run by volunteers and as such it is not always consistent If you change a page while nobody is watching and nobody notices after the fact it slides through If you always follow policies when it comes to sourcing you can t go wrong IV