You re completely misunderstanding Wikipedia policies here Lukeno94 It is the verifiability of an info that is the most important policy In case the info can not be verified then a consensus should always be taken And the name of thvictim is completely verifable and even the family has permitted her name to be revealed I respect your and everyone s views but I respect Wikipedia policies too I ve never said that I m going to include her name regardless of what other users think I have instead said that I would like to prefer discussing this matter in a civil manner and that s what I have been doing The main Wikipedia policy is adding verified information Any verified information that is significant can not be removed But still I preferred discussion because I think it is probably the best thing to do Last of all I would like to Gandydancer for misunderstanding his last comment He actually stated that the name of the victim should be included in the article Sorry for that friend