You forgot to add the url for your additional source I found this one which if it s the one you meant you might want to add From what I see in my find and in your quote above it gives the height as 800 ft 244 m and NOT the 244 m 801 ft that you changed the text too I understand that 244 m converts mathematically to to 800 ft but it is also true that 800 ft converts mathematically to 244 m So as the latter seems a better match and as we have no good reason to assume otherwise I ve restored the original figures so as not to deviate from the official dimensions