Doug you have not read Milton s book yourself You rely on the review of a single fundamentalist Christian who trained as a physicist If the article is to be made more neutral look at these links funnily enough this first link was written by a creationist but he was more neutral and please look at all these other links all third party mostly there s even a published article from milton himself explaining his position there is also a review of milton in the independent newspaper some very negetive some very positive To make more neutral both postive and negetive to be included to make an objective view To make the make neutral i suggest most of these to be included See second page down Review of Milton s Facts of Life Neo Darwinism Is it Time to Reconsider Richard Milton Independent book review of Milton s book Richard Milton s book takes up the evidence of adaptive evolution among others to wage war on Darwinian theory in general His interpretation of these particular experiments is that they support Lamarck s long discredited notion that offspring can inherit the acquired characteristics of their parents For good measure he throws in a bit of Jung and Sheldrake along with Fred Hoyle s theory that life originated in outer space anything that might from any source or direction support his own highly opinionated attack An article written by Milton himself Here is a negetive review from an evolutionist website of Milton s book Here is a review of Milton s book which is mixed This reference is already on the article Shattering the myths of Darwinism Darwin Doesn t Work Here Anymore by Richard Milton Shattering the myths of Darwinism review Where Did We Come From An Exploration of Different Theories of Evolution Description of Milton s book from a Christian organization When a reputable science journalist and secular evolutionist himself raises serious doubts about Evolution then it is time to listen On subject after subject fossils biology geology etc Richard Milton finally reveals evolutionists dirty little secret There is still NO real evidence for Evolution and the popular dating methods are scientifically unreliable and seriously flawed You can also see here many books which mention Richard Milton Please head over to the wiki fringe board section on Richard Milton Both a user Hrafn claims there are no sources for Milton and another user said There seems to be too little information available about him to justify and article and it should be deleted What does this show It shows that users do not even look they just want so called fringe articles deleted See my point now