This is ludicrous 20 15 3 Mar 2004 UTC I agree entirely However it is no more ludicrous than splitting Walsall or Dudley 20 26 Mar 3 2004 UTC There are some good reasons to split district articles from their town They include a if the district is much larger than the town and covers a lot of countryside b if the district includes town which have a strong identity That the borough district is a city is not a good reason because city status is a mere honorific and doesn t change facts on the ground If we split Dudley and Walsall we have to split Birmingham Coventry and Wolverhampton Note I am opposed to all splits of articles about metropolitan boroughs 20 32 Mar 3 2004 UTC Nice to see this one s been reunified It seems seemed a bit more ludicrous than spliiting Walsall town form Walsal Borough because there was nothing to indicate that Wolverhampton city contained more than Wolverhampton town I guess you were just making a point and it doesn t I think the articles should be split on the basis of how much we ve got to say about the two definitions If we ve only got a few lines about one it can live with the other I was indeed making a point though it seems to have been missed If we look at Birmingham say the city includes Sutton Coldfield but the town does not This however does not mean to say we should split the article I know that someone from Bradford said that Bradford shouldn t be split even though Bradford is a far far clearer case for splitting than Dudley 20 53 Mar 3 2004 UTC Waste Management Suggest the page has an extra section about waste management and recycling in the city Wolverhampton Express and Star It doesn t say in the text whether it is the largest provincial daily in the UK Maybe that should be added My nick is taken from a similar town in France by the way 11 34 22 Apr 2005 UTC External links I do nt see why the links to the city s football team university and grammar school were removed What makes those links less valid than the Express and Star hospitals and the Linux User Group Wiki on Wolverhampton is 100x better than it was a year ago Sport Wolverhampton Wanderers have never been in the current UEFA Champions League competition Wolves have only been in the English F A Premiership for one season 2002 03 since the Champions League began and in that season they were relegated back to the lower division Coca Cola Championship The current Champions League competition only started in the 1992 93 season the premier European club tournament before the Champions League was the European Champions Club Cup in which Wolves did compete in In fact the UEFA Champions League was a simple rebrand of the previous competition which was created due to the European success of Wolverhampton Wanderers and the reaction of the British press to the results To quote from European Cup and Champions League History Before we declare that Wolverhampton are invincible let them go to Moscow and Budapest And there are other internationally renowned clubs A C Milan and Real Madrid to name but two A club world championship or at least a European one larger more meaningful and more prestigious than the Mitropa Cup and more original than a competition for national teams should be launched Gabriel Hanot Remit of this article This is a thought of mine that s been prompted by the recent addition and removal of Perton and Bilbrook from the article What exactly is the remit of the article After all there are several definitions of what Wolverhampton is The Local Authority area administered by Wolverhampton City Council The Wolverhampton Urban Sub Area as defined by the ONS or the city proper perhaps This include the LA area plus the areas within South Staffordshire district that are physically attached within 50 m to the urban area These would include Lower Penn Perton Coven Heath Westcroft and Essington The above plus areas that are within a few hundred metres of the Urban Area such as Wombourne Codsall Bilbrook Coven Featherstone Most of these areas were recommended for inclusion in the Borough by the