Be ker edits CW so he is in a conflict of interest Budak s statement that Nitko nije radio ozbiljnu analizu hrvatske Wikipedije is false in the light of a recent study that has been added to the article Budak s statement that dojam je da je taj broj devijantnih lanaka vrlo mali u odnosu na ukupnu hrvatsku Wikipediju i da to nije neki ozbiljniji problem Wikipedije is subjective and thus worthless What is small according to him Even few amounts to thousands of articles The argument was never that CW was in general unreliable and revisionist only in articles dealing with problematic parts of Croatian history and identity Given that Budak doesn t seem to have inspected the issue thoroughly or even read the disputed articles and that his remarks are in vague and general terms his opinion should be discarded as well