Please help me end this drama once in for all I really do hate to get start making accusations but I feel as if User Delicious carbuncle is seriously heading down a road of corruption It all started over a simple proposal at WP VILLAGE where I skeptically proposed an idea for a template similar to the Template Romeo warning for silly vandals apparently belonging to cheerleading squads DC then started questioning my actions at WP ABUSE in which case I appropriately addressed his concerns However he seems to possibly have a problem with either my involvement at the project or perhaps even the project as a whole He posted my real life first name high school and high school mascot in an example in which case I raised concerns of WP OUTING note that his previous block for outing is unrelated He said that it was merely a random name he chose and I ve chosen to WP AGF in the matter and you may treat that matter however you so desire After receiving a comment on his talk page from a blatant IP troll that s been harassing me for over a month he decided to start looking into the trolls claims about my handling of a repeat offender mainly known here as User LBHS Cheerleader He started heatedly questioning my actions asking for diffs about bans I had removed a suspected sockpuppet template stating that the user might be related to User Bobabobabo which I had added over a year ago and replaced it with a banned template since although I feel it s inappropriate that we were using Boba s ban against LBHSC without evidence I similiarily felt it was inappropriate to all of a sudden to consider her debanned I also added LBHSC to the list of community banned users as it seemed to be a consensus to me I probably should have discussed this first but I did not in light of WP BOLD and WP DENY I didn t want to start a thread without absolutely needing to Per WP DUCK it seems pretty obvious that LBHSC and her minions have been vandalizing for quite some time at least since 2006 probably ban worthy However I gracefully removed the contested templates when Delicious carbuncle started a thread at WP AN I in attempt to calmly settle the issue and even stated that I would voluntarily abandon my efforts to combat LBHSC s disruption beyond non controversial reverting of blatant vandalism of course DC ruthlessly refused to compromise and I even contemplated retirement if only to save my name PCHS NJROTC Even then DC was not satisfied Several users argued that LBHSC should indeed be considered banned as she would likely never be unblocked including highly respected admins Many editors administrators and even members of the WP ArbCom have expressed their opinion that DC should move on Even an admin who felt I had acted out of line and should be blocked stated that there s not enough support to keep the discussion going Although there were those who defended my actions 100 felt that although that the user should be banned but I should have discussed first felt that I was being power hungry and even thought that my actions were abusive the general consenus of everybody was that I had offered settlement learned important lessons and that good faith should be assumed Despite consensus DC continued to revive the discussion over and over again providing nothing new and basically insisting on action He has been warned repeatedly by several respected editors He had stopped and I had disengaged I really wish this could have stayed in the past However Delicious carbuncle started User Delicious carbuncle PCHS NJROTC ban redux in the dawn of the new year Considering the edit summary he used when creating the page I initially thought his intentions were to use that as an arguement against someone who he is in conflict with known as User Neutralhomer In desire to not be involved in his conflict I nominated the page for deletion at WP MFD I viewed it simply as an attack page which did not help the encyclopedia I could have nominated for WP CSD but I didn t want to say that he was attacking me as I was in favor of disengagement as was recommended at AN I In response to the MfD he indicated that he intends to start yet another ban discussion I m not sure if he s wanting a topic ban on vandalism as before which really isn t even a topic or an all out ban I did indicate that I would not stay here if I was topic banned and that I would just assume be renamed to something unaffiliated with me i e Vandal Fighter Missing in Action and then be fully banned but thankfully there s no support for either a topic ban or all out ban It s clear that disengagement is still prefered based on some comments at the MfD discussion After the original p