The article should be titled with the name used most commonly in contemporary sources not in antiquated sources I think it would be a good idea to rename all of the old school racial anthropology articles to reflect that they are not currently consider to have any empirical validity Indeed it should not be the case that the article on nordic race cover content related to people with scandinavian ancestry as those two things are clearly separate topics in the literature with very different scientific status User Maunus aunus snun w