Withdrawn charges The London Free press also reported that his charges were withdrawn silently Now from the perspective of a normal criminal process this usually means the police had a weak case The fact that the police were gung ho about this case may also suggest that the police had no case at all judging by the seemingly high profile aspect to this case In other words Homeontherange s addition of that information is a pretty clear sign that the information is being added in order to disparage James Scott Richardson What is my point of reference Well When I added information to Alex Kulbashian and Richard Warman about a Canadian Human Rights Commission complaint file by Alex against Richard Homeontherange removed the information stating that the complaint could have been filed however it wasn t serious enough to because there was no evidence the Commissioner signed off on it Now getting back to this case the crown attorney and or withdrew the charges because there was no prospect for conviction To Homeontherange If you are going to have double standards in enforcing wikipedia s criteria for information posted in articles then that shows your political motivation behind your edits and the way you handle your administrative tasks That would be classified as Administrator Abuse Wikipedia Administrators Administrator abuse Furthermore the fact that the IP address 72 136 34 96 spontaneously lost the ability to make edits without logging in with no explanation could also show a certain level of abuse of administrative rights by the way Will be reporting that to Jimbo Wales So feel free to revert the edit I ve made but make an attempt to justify your actions this time