I was also eyeing the Jane link as inappropriate clutter especially given that the Burpee Museum has its own page It might be appropriate under T Rex or Theropods but not here Several of the See also links are redundant or questionable e g taphonomy since it is now in the page narrative Regarding a fav or famous fossil list I think it would become intractably long not to mention the subjectivity involved I ve already noticed that the Lagerst tte page has fallen victim to subjectivity as several listed sites are not traditionally considered to meet the admittedly fuzzy criteria i e extraordinary fossil richness or completeness 100 paleontologists would generate 100 different lists A separate page is possible but you ll be working on it for a long long time I expect