While agreeing broadly with the claim that the paragraph is unnecessary if it stays it shouldn t include Adraeus unsubstantiated claims about what strong atheists say about weak atheists Aside from reverting to the earlier version I ve tried to bring some consistency to the article in terms for example of how books are referred to and I ve removed the final paragraph Aside from being almost impenetrably ungrammatical it made reference to other disciplines as though atheism is itself a discipline and in general didn t seem to be doing anything useful 10 34 15 Mar 2005 UTC