I disagree I think that fairness is an important aspiration No I accept that there is some valid work there and I respect your attempts to be fair But I don t believe you ve succeeded in fairness and despite all your Wiki correctness you or some others have somehow almost surgically removed much valid criticism that was mentioned and referenced and also managed to leave out a whole raft of important fact as exemplified by the glaring omission of any mention of Rawat s teaching the ashram way of life That information was there I pop in after an absence of a few months and lo it s all gone along with everything else I edited Furthermore this talk page still has diehards Momento you and this Rainer fellow still trying to turn black into white even arguing that Rawat did not teach the ashram way of life Can you expect me to take this stuff seriously Please don t be surprised that I don t have so much faith that your particular brand of Wiki Correctness is yielding an accurate and valuable resource