I will neither resort to insults nor put any words in the opponent s mouth like you just did Instead I will stick to the point The matter of fact is you cited regulations only partially leaving out the regulation that warns about bias It says interpreted that all authors and all sources are by definition biased until filtered through neutrality checks and balances So stop raising references alone to the pedestal of allmightiness They alone are insufficient to establish that there is no bias in them and otherwise They must have an outside check In historical science the check is called primary historical document and it supersedes all references ever written on history In this case it is the Ottoman military records used to create List of Ottoman sieges and landings Growth 281453 E2 80 931683 29 and Eyalet Eyalets in 1609 Learn to distinguish primary and secondary historic sources References in historical sciences are secondary sources and when they off hand wild guesses such as Bosnia fell in xxxx they are called tertiary sources Man do I have to teach you the basics here