response to Bishonen to Bishonen to Bishonen never answered questions my responses to Bishonen are indented with a I had to fight hard for it but I don t believe I am being ganged up now I am being taken seriously now and not insulted It was your attitude towards me that did and still bothers me I am NOT asking you to go to these editors and intervene at this point It will only stir up antagonism where now we have peace Obviously this is your decision I m just stating that it s not my wish Will you please sign your comments at least somewhere You accused me of trolling too a word whose meaning I had to ask my 18 year old son All I can say is I believe you got what you deserved when you interfered in this whole thing I know you re an adminstrator now and it doesn t impress me I can and do accuse you of pa trolling like a Nazi storm trooper Dear Bishonon questions Is there any excuse for how they treated me and other newcomers or anyone that questions them I can t answer questions without any information in them sorry You ll have to link me to some of the posts from these users that you re complaining about I d appreciate diff links but I realize you re new and may have trouble making them But at least tell me the page the date and the time I find this statement fascinating in light of your assertions below You have obviously looked around on some of the article edits in question Why didn t you look at anything else If you knew where to look at edits on the Dem Party article I would assume you would know where to look for our dialogues You keep making accusations at me and then state that you know nothing about the situation This is hilarious just some page dates and times 1 1 1 7 concerning the Democratic Party United States article Please be advised though that I can t undertake to comment in any depth at all on the content of the articles about American politics that I see you editing I don t know much about the subject and few of the names in the articles mean anything to me That said I expect I can recognize what you call how they treated you ganging up etc if I see it A sincere thank you for that recognize ganging up I wasn t asking for that exactly But now that you mention it if you don t know much about American politics I don t think you should be getting involved in my edits concerning American politics The article reads for the most part like a giant advertisement for the Democratic Party It s improving now because I stood up to these yes bullies The editors have been making this article less biased due to my edits and my arguments See the differences in the article since I joined in this debate and edit war Though I guess you wouldn t understand any of the dsicussion Is there any excuse for their ganging up on and even gathering people for the express purpose of ganging up on one person particularly a newcomer to Wikipedia Same these are only a few things that I remember or even was aware of Democratic Party United States talk page a comment from Griot to 8bitJake Jake thanks for holding the fort against that Wolf character in the Democratic Party article Guys like him who want to use Wikipedia to pontificate their opinions are a real danger to the whole enterprise I m glad you re standing up to him Griot cur last 18 30 19 April 2006 8bitJake m Wikipedia Lamest edit wars this following what I said on the page I m not saying it now and then going to 8bitJake s talk page if it remains there and is not deleted 1 1 2 3 5 13 5 and 6 please see some deleted converstions between Griot and me I don t pretend to know why these have been deleted These were civil and pleasant comments from both Griot and myself this is a little off my point here too this entire page got suddenly archived when I beat Jersyko with his XY debate Please see bottom of page If you read it and then note how the talk page was suddenly archived I think you will see what I am driving at Also note real clear insults personal attacks condescention etc