What a curious block I restored the original sources about those figures because somebody recently replaced them with sources that do not even talk about those figures And I included the source about the 3 million Portuguese in S o Paulo because the user Ningu m included a fact tag there Curiously the user Ningu m reverted the original sources I included Then he s the one who started the edit warring Isn t vandalism to reverte an user that replaced a fact tag with a source and restored the original sources that have been there since a long time but somebody replaced them I gave the source about the Portuguese and Ningu m replace the source once again with a fact tag and he also reverted to the new sources which are from a not reliable site including the one about the Portuguese which do not even talk about the figure I included the source which does talk about 3 million Portuguese and it was reverted by Ningu m without any explaination Isn t vandalism to erase a source and replace it with a fact tag If this is not vandalism if it s a normal edit to erase sources and replace them with fact tags please tell me