The matter is only an un merge discussion because you proceeded rapidly to delete the page and accomplish the merge knowing that I a newcomer to the matter had sound editorial objections And apologies for marginalizing your clear lawyerly concerns but your behavioural lectures are lost on me despite your ability to quote chapter and verse You ignored repeated lower case attempts to engage you in dialog asking you clearly allow discussion to continue Instead you proceeded to delete the Foundation page despite being asked explicitly not to because it would confuse the discussion for new incoming parties And you wonder why on asking a final time for you to not delete the page I resorted to upper case to get your attention Moreover and critically I saw how you treated the independent novice editor that tried to engage you in the initial deletion merger discussion Your zealotry for article purity confuses both technical issues are there any citations and are they good enough and overwhelms your commitment to WP standards of treatment of young editors clearly I have as much or more experience professionally and here vis vis judging the quality of organizational sources and science organizational sources The quality of sources for this foundation sources you did not bother to find allowed me to begin taking steps to improve the article You bulldozed past these clinging to the legality that you had the permission you needed to delete and so disregarded and disrespected two fellow editors at that stage still communicating in lower case So forgive if I say your WP THIS and WP THAT however legally sound it might be in spirit rings very hollow I have stated my peace Please return the Foundation article to the main article space so that all editors experienced and inexperienced can easily find it so that the merger can be discussed and a final decision made Or as I said budget time for explaining this all to a group of impartial admins and fellow editors Cheers Le Prof