Evidently you do not understand my latest argument 1 the section in question does not discuss the causes of the riot It discusses the circumstances of the death of the kid 2 I selectively chose to only cite the part of the quote that is presented as fact not rumor 3 I kept the full citation of that quote later in the paragraph without expressing any objection 4 I didn t argue against the veracity of the first part see 2 and 5 I noted that the second part of the quote was presented in Time as fact I m not on a mission it simply appears to me that there are two sides to this story and your version of the article is unacceptably slanted toward one side