thank you anon I actually participated in that discussion but the questions I m now concerned about weren t addressed at the time What concerns me now is that it s a self published paper that relies heavily on hearsay and makes no attempt to source things that are now being extracted from it as if they re facts The one example I used is of great concern to me but there are others on the Mason Remey and BUPC pages that are also contentious I m curious if it s merits are defendable beyond what s been cited above already because it appears to only be a self published paper and should only be used as such IMO