He edited without a valid talk page discussion You would have slapped a tag on the page I merely indicated that his argument was based on an ad hominem and removed the edit I wasn t looking for an editor who agreed with me I was looking for an editor who would spend more than 10 minutes researching the subject and making a snap judgement The third party source I included indicated that Underwood had posted regularly to alt slack and the newsgroup post that is undeniably by Ivan Stang his ip his style his sense of humor responses to his post by other church members serving to indicate his identity demonstrated that Underwood was a subject of levity in the Church The third link I included had several dozen posts between Underwood and church members The third party source indicates that these posts were by Underwood Therefore they are verified by a third party source You just were too lazy to bother Now you re too irate to bother Either way my respect for you as an editor has kept this all on the talk page despite your lack of research on the subject