Obviously JamesMLane and Dogru think a Criticisms section is not legitimate for Jerrold Nadler or Deborah Glick yet they are silent on why they exist for politicians like Hillary Clinton and similar major figures The reason is obvious of course they can not prevent the major politicians and all their critics from forcing a Criticisms section on their bio s but for small fry politicos like Glick and Nadler they have a fighting chance to bully honest contributors with their dirty trick partisan sobatage tactics Sorry won t work these people are just hacks for the Socialist er Democratic Party they probably get many financial and perk benefits from DP yet they haven t identified themselves while I have The usual major party smear jobs par for the course Wikipedia and our fellow members will never tolerate vandalism and biased partisanship from such rogue members Nicolas Leobold