No you re misunderstanding I don t want the article to use the words that s important I want the article to use sources and language that demonstrate that the topic is important enough to have been discussed in depth outside of its own writings and or that the IAG s work is important enough to be commonly relied on outside its own walls On the topic of the IAG s standards for example it s one thing to say X creates standards for blah it s a much more useful thing to say or demonstrate that X creates standards that are used widely throughout the industry and are acknowledged as reliable measurements of blah Right now the article does the former and what I m trying to get across to you is that the latter is where notability is going to be established You re welcome to re submit the AFC as is if you really think I m utterly wrong on this but it s a bit odd to run something through a review process and then refuse to believe the review you get