Obviously I disagree with the note about the photographs The term graphic tends to inappropriately stigmatize the nature of the photography The photographas are clinical and medical in nature They are scientifically relevant and in no way should be associated with things like pornography or grpahic sexuality that somme cultures consider inappropriate for some audience Noting that they are Surgical photos makes their content emphatically clear for anyone who might not be emotionally or psychologically mature enough to view them There are plenty of articles on wikipedia about medical issues with photographs that do not include any such warnings e g Breast implant Risks and debate Breast implant If you took the time to read the entirety of the information Anne Lawrence MD provides on Dr Metlzer s work and techniques you will see that his origination of his techhniques and procedures are documented there See also the referenced article by Takta LL and Meltzer TR in pubmed I believe this article is being held to a ridiculous and unfair standard that is not representative of the wikipedia I believe that the microscopic treatment this article has received is evidence of bias against its subject matter while the simple fact is clear that this surgeon is referenced repeatedly in other wikipedia articles about related surgical topics In addition the very nature of the subject matter should be protected a topic given the level of bigotry discrimination and violence including murder against people who receive these medical treatments The very fact that a surgeon like Toby Meltzer with such a prestigious medical background chooses to concentrate on such service to other people who have few if any equally qualified alternatives is notable by itself without need for any further citation These surgeries are in and of themselves pioneering and largely non existent on any measurable scale before the 1960s Even now the number of frequent U S practitioners is few including only Meltzer and Marci Bowers MD who was previously a patient of Meltzer on a truly regular basis 19 29 17 September 2006