The compromise is between 24 000 characters worth of back and forth for a theory with no real acceptance versus nothing I ve spent a lot of time tracking down the sources for those 24 000 characters all with not a whit of change from the scientific community on the topic That s what I want to avoid having to find yet another source that points out some minor detail of the elephant s kidney does not mean hominins were once aquatic Do you think it s an adequate compromise If not would you suggest replacing the list wholesale t c Wikipedia s rules simple complex