I think we clearly agree more than we disagree Just to clarify my point though I feel that for the very reason that we indeed do not want to speak authoritatively on a single proven cause this is more than just saying explicitly up front that there are multiple theories Whether our audience includes those touched by the affliction or also those from the general public who want to learn more we owe it to them not to give undue weight to observations that exist as isolated anecdotes in the literature even the academically peer reviewed literature The academic peer reviewed literature includes multiple review articles and it would be better to shorten the page by largely deleting material that is not cited there