Immature edits by immature people Your proposed cheerleader editnotice is a strong not very friendly solution to a problem that historically has been solved with honey The historical way of dealing with editors who are immature is to watchlist articles likely to attract them revert them kindly explain why they were reverted using a welcome template or an individualized note and point them to the right way of doing this Wikipedia is largely edited by adults for adults using social constructs familiar to adults It s not MySpace or cartoon pedia or AllThingsDisneyWiki com and it s not a teen hang out or kid s playground The social rules that junior high and elementary school students use day in day out are quite different from those of Wikipedia and WP BITE says we have to be understanding of this and use a velvet glove approach I don t run across very many editors who seem young by their edits but most of those I do don t last long I can understand why socially it s just not a good fit A my school pedia about their school and town edited by them for them would be a much better fit and much more enjoyable for them talk contribs e mail