Sitush did not explain that deleting everything except the reference to rebellion against Pakistan Army is the only thing he left If something is not properly sourced than it should be talked about rather than deleting the whole thing I am not sure what your reference means to Ghulam Ahmad if something is poorly formatted than an editor should try to format it how can a person just say that the source is unreliable that is a judgemental call and is subjective Rather than destroying an article one should try to improve it i am sure that the hundreds of sudhans who spent time fixing this article were not making up things I would like to have positive help rather than deleting everything