Questions about a certain reversion edit I have some questions about this edit I did not remove the character string that supposedly is the title That is the string that is the title according to the edit comment which says um no the title is the line above that On the other hand this edit see above did remove the character string that IMHO was a better title That is the string that I thought was better as all or part of a title for the web page with the URL of I am not immediately ready to insist that leaving in both of those two character strings is the best choice However if you have any comments about that idea I am willing to listen I am prepared to try to reach some consensus Is there anything we can do to explore or discuss or explain to each other the goals that are perhaps to be achieved by choosing well and carefully which character string to use as the title or maybe that should say the goals that are more nearly to be achieved by doing so Would it benefit anyone perhaps in pursuing the above mentioned goals if one of us were to explore or discuss or explain the reasons why the use of the character stringSabal Adanson ex Guersent Bulletin des Sciences par la Societe Philomatique 87 205 206 1804 for the title would be better Do we both understand thoroughly and well what each word of that title means and what its role is in doing whatever things a title is supposed to be helpful for such as describing the topic of a certain web page and informing the reader a little bit what a certain web page is about Do we both or do any of us think that this title Sabal Adanson ex Guersent Bulletin des Sciences par la Societe Philomatique 87 205 206 1804 comes closer to describing the topic of the web page or otherwise in some sense doing thoroughly and well those things that a title is slash should be helpful for Have both of us sufficiently considered the question of what the web page with the URL of value of the url field is about IMHO it comes pretty close to being about Palmetto I could be wrong I hope this does not sound too negative I hope that there is still a chance that one of us can wake up and learn something that is not already known at least something that we don t both already know So maybe there is hope for a happy win win outcome that will be the best for all concerned It would even be fine with me if after reaching some consensus successfully we were to nuke this whole section if e g we both wanted to delete it before it got in to any archive files No harm no foul getting in to history logs or remaining in them might be a different matter You are welcome btw to answer some questions that I did not know to ask if any The kindness of a response and OR an edit that restores the word Palmetto would be appreciated Thank you