Danny you said above about my complaint of POV scriptures inserted In one comment he claims it s POV to use scripture to validate JW beliefs then in the next he says they don t support those beliefs Which is it It s both Danny They are not mutually exclusive You have inserted a plethora of scriptures to try and validate JWs doctrines You and others are well aware that the vast majority of Bible scholars do not agree with that use of the Bible and they say it s misused and misquoted over and over by JWs That is why scriptures should not be there 1 The Bible does not back up JW doctrine so it is not a valid reference and 2 It should not be misused as it is now to manipulate the public into thinking that the Bible validates JWs teachings These many many scriptures have only been inserted to try and influence the readers they are not there for any valid reference or a back up to JW doctrine they are just propaganda If they are to stay then you or someone should put an equal link to discussions that state these JWs doctrines are not majority scripture based and there are plenty of sites to choose from Balance is the key if there are to be many misused POV scriptures over and over again row after row then there has to be for balance an equal number of links to scholarly discussion contradicting JWs interpretation of those scriptures and how they in the vast majority do not back up JWs doctrine At the moment Danny you are trying to turn this entire article into a Watchtower magazine packed with misquoted scriptures and no discussion making any proven point that these scriptures are backing up JWs doctrines Just the usual dump a scripture and run routine it s not acceptable Danny you may think any form of propaganda is ok as your religion teaches that but keep it in your own magazines please don t infect a public domain with it I m sure this will fall on deaf ears You made another comment Either way it isn t a point of view but an indisputable fact that JWs use the Bible as the primary source of their doctrines and beliefs Come on Danny you know your comment is highly incorrect and very deceitful Take a look at their predictions where are they in the Bible didn t Russell have a fetish for pyramids and made predictions based on their measurements 1 demonstrate where 1899 1874 1878 1914 1918 1925 1975 etc are an indisputable fact that JWs use the Bible as the primary source of their doctrines and beliefs 2 Or Where does the Bible divide major and minor blood parts and say one is ok and the other a grave sin I can t find that in my Bible can you show me please Or plasma is a sin but breaking it down is ok or that red blood cells are a sin to use but using the 99 haemoglobin in them is ok Or that animal blood is a sin but processing cows blood into products is and using them is ok You get the picture Danny and there are pages and pages more that scholars agree have no basis in the Holy Bible are all Please refrain from making silly emotional claims that will end up with egg on your face You say more While many disagree with JW interpretation of the Bible it is important that WP readers see how JWs use scriptures except Danny they do not see that there are no justifying explanations just a scriptures dropped in and then run along to the next one before they have time to think For each scripture there should also be a link to a scholarly discussion that is contrary to JWs interpretation to give a rounded balance of coverage if you oppose this you have proven your motives are not pure but agenda seeking for religious promotion not balanced articles in a public domain thus proving that these inserted scriptures are POV and should not be there Why can t a belief just be they believe x y z You are not discussing scriptures and there is not room on Wikipedia for that so why try and manipulate by dropping them in controversially and then running away with no justification for they reference 8th of September 2005