What what Ooh no I don t do FA class reviewers are much too awkward to deal with at that level A class coupled with GA are my limit And as far as this article goes it doesn t need improving it needs a 100 rewrite it has become far too sloppy and contains so much trivial stuff that the prose is terrible to read in places events are all over the place i e not very well written chronologically speaking and it isn t very encyclopedic any more No wonder it was delisted and no one wants to promote it which is a shame given that this man was a true British hero In contrast Napoleon s page is well written has better focus and is clearly of a higher standard If I were to rewrite this I d literally spend months starting from scratch in sandbox and simply replace the lot when done I don t think leadership is required too WP OWNish Simply needs someone to be WP BOLD and redo the whole page objectively from birth to death without all the off side commentary that currently plagues the page Unfortunately I m tied down writing an extensive article on Napoleon s entire military career and I m only up to 1796 after months of reading long way to go yet so even if I were to consider rewriting this it wouldn t be until sometime next year at the earliest once this other article has been through the process of several long winded PR A GA reviews first I have no idea what 1 May 2012 means in the heading His 243rd birthday Chat RFF