that edit summaries are small doesn t seem to be a satisfactory explanation Notwithstanding that there is far more room available for edit summaries you elected to waste your seven short words by stating something no evidence of a connection to al qaeda that simply wasn t at all true This isn t the first time you ve edited in a way that stripped out the legitimate and topical mentioning of someone s known links to Al Qaeda like this recent one only eight days ago on 2007 Fort Dix attack plot I m not saying this makes you a bad person I m simply saying these are bad edits Please learn to differentiate between the two BTW Causa sui With regard to the category Category Al Qaeda propagandists I note your 16 11 29 April 2010 post here on your talk page