Hi Pterantula The encyclopedia entry requires attributions and references For example the studies of the effects of Landmark Education is from the third party surveys If instead the encyclopedia entry were to have customer testimonials instead they could be struck on grounds they are not verifiable We ve gone around in circles on that many times as well As well the 20 points of critique are all against Landmark Education with rebuttals in many cases As for litigation I am aware of five outbound cases Pre emptive warning 1 Traci Hukill The Est of Friends 1998 pre emptive warning no suit filed Actual litigation outbound Elle Magazine 1998 LE achieved no result Cynthia Kisser 1997 LE won retraction Margaret Singer 1997 LE won retraction Rick Ross 2005 LE cancelled suit for product disparagement There are about three inbound cases against LE Stefanie Ney court ruled in LE s favor Been versus Weed 2002 10 claims 3 settled 7 dropped LE was a cross defendent Tracy Neff 1997 sexual harrassment settled out of court LE lacked a sexual harrassment policy at the time and got pulled in on this Does anyone have anything more than this from LE s inception in 1991 14 years ago Litigation regarding est should be on the est page For a company with 70 million in revenue and over 800 000 customers of the Landmark Forum this is a tiny amount of litigation