You are Wiki Lawyering and frankly if anybody is doing the harassing here it s you You have repeatedly minimized my arguments by claiming that I am Sockpuppeting Meatpuppeting and making personal attacks when I am attacking the material of the article and its source You are passive aggressive is not an egregious personal attack and you didn t read what I wrote and you are being deliberately obtuse isn t a personal attack at all Seriously How is You re deliberately not reading what I wrote possibly offensive to anybody I didn t come here to create drama I didn t claim that I did I claimed that a particular website made me aware of something on wikipedia that I thought was wrongly included in an article I ve made legitimate criticisms and my comments are directly responsible for the creation of the Crucifixion in Art page I argued civilly enough and generated enough consensus among the majority of wiki users to remove the offending material from the original Crucifixion page and have it moved to a new page When I got around to looking at that new page I found that it had not been cleaned up and contained questionable claims from an unreliable tertiary source so I made an argument on the discussion page and removed the offending material Because I didn t make an edit summary I found my revision rather rudely reverted by a member of one of your user groups I reacted and Alan pointed out my mistake a simple oversight by a novice user one that might have been cleared up when I read Alan s talk page had you not immediately jumped in and made baseless claims against me 68 114 130 234