I did put together a criticism section which pretty well defined what I think should go in You can say it s too long but you can t say I haven t said what s wrong with the article There are some issues with what s in the article but the real complaint is with what s not in The article does not discuss 1 the criticism of the trial by US television commentators 2 Guede s bad acts prior to the murder and why as argued by AK and RS lawyers they make it more likely that he acted alone 3 The criticism of Mignini including actions in other cases that relate to this one and 4 influence of European tabloids on the trial among other things All of this is specifically discussed by reliable sources The article now argues for guilt a substantial majority of reliable sources say innocence or flawed process so there s a real problem I don t understand how anyone can say that the neutrality of this article isn t under dispute by about half of the editors here