You re not assuming good faith I read the article the day the movie came out so I was unaware of the correction I read the article in its original form which thoroughly bashed the movie Furthermore my statements about Michael Chrichton were very accurate I also put this in the alternative theories section since this is the minority view But something being a minority view doesn t make it an incorrect view or vandalism If you disagree with me you can reword my blurb to your liking but to call it vandalism is petty