21 May 2006 UTC I think the main issue with bias was that the paragraph appeared to be making a statement of fact How many people reading this article actually follow the links to the sources cited Not many because it would take hours As the source is biased and also notoriously unreliable we shouldn t be uncritically adopting it to make statements of fact If you wanted to say something like anti BNP publication Searchlight has stated that would be perfectly acceptable but I don t think it would add much to the article 13 36