I guess there are two issues However just because you fail to see the value of the content IMO does not justify the reversions when the content added by myself and others made which accurately toned down the bold statement being made that most textbooks failed to address the criticism of the SPE Your suggested wording is akin to what we already made Is the content helpful I d be happier if we addressed the fact that the SPE is often used as a notable subject in psychology education Perhaps a better source can be found which mentions this and can be moved to a different section of the article as it probably doesn t belong in criticism Makin Bacon