There is an reference in the lomborg article to HAN in the brittanica online Four of his environmentalist opponents two of the four who had contributed to the negative review in the Scientific American referred the book to the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty and the committee s judgment was based primarily on the Scientific American articles In April 2003 a Netherlands based academic institution Heidelberg Appeal the Netherlands examined the judgment It found that there were 27 accusations against Lomborg of which only two minor ones might be justified Meanwhile Lomborg had lodged a formal complaint against the Danish Committee and in December the Danish government overturned the committee s ruling UCS is also no recognised academic body So revert all your changes