Yes but how is this actually relevant to whether it belongs in the article I think you think that the content being there is somehow an endorsement of the Daily Mail It isn t it is a mere documentation that allegations of special stage management were part of the controversy and they were subsequently shown to be rubbish I see no merit in not mentioning it simply because it was the Daily Mail or that is was rubbish I am sure if its really necessary this theme could be supported by better sources but the Daily Mail was just the most obvious example I came across at the time I realy am not seeing the problem here We are certainly not going to start removing content simply because it comes from anti BBC sources and I am extremely concerned that there even seems to be a subtext here that the Mail were acting as some sort of proxy for the BNP This isn t the best way to decided what is and is not relevant to the article