I suppose you were trying to respond to the above which was a response to WDM You are quite wrong that I have caused chaos in this article Nor have I attacked you I made it plain that for reasons of bias and authorship your GA review wasn t applicable to this article Please also note that when I say you are biased that is merely shorthand for saying your suggestions and editing have been biased That s all I ll say on this subject except to ask you to read WP NPA Talk Contribs