2015 Minneapolis shooting 2015 Minneapolis shooting You said User Mr Granger was correct that we can not use eye witness testimony as a declaration of fact You state that you are simply using the video as a primary source but that is not what you wrote in the article You did not say that the video shows someone claiming to be a member of the group and claiming that such and such happened You simply inserted the person s statement as facts Meters talk While I initially referred to the video as being a primary source I later clarified that statement to recognize that once the video was placed on YouTube YouTube being analogous to a magazine or newspaper it became in that form a secondary source As such I can quote from that video without it being called us ing eye witness testimony as a declaration of fact Besides it wasn t testimony It was not given under oath but it WAS given before a camera and the resulting video was placed on YouTube and thus in that form it was a secondary source Go back and re read what I subsequently wrote I refer to this later