Saying that Largoplazo only nominated the article for deletion because of deletionist tendencies is hardly uncivil and is entirely valid considering that he just nominated the article for deletion again even AFTER I added more sources to it He s clearly aiming to take advantage of the fact that I can t currently edit the Articles for deletion page to defend the article which is patently childish and uncivil behavior For example if I were capable of editing the Articles for deletion page that he just created I would note that the film has been covered in all sorts of notable sources like British Film Institute The Village Voice Microsoft iTunes International Film Festival Rotterdam Buenos Aires International Festival of Independent Cinema to name just a few I would also point out that several notable people were involved with the film like the VERY notable Tuli Kupferberg who stars in it But I can t edit the page because I m blocked right now and he nominated the article for deletion again only after you blocked me because he wanted to make sure I couldn t edit the Articles for deletion page That kind of behavior is far more damaging to the encyclopedia than anything that I said to him