I never said we need to cover up the fact I said that the fact is irrelevant to anal sex and the way it is presented in the article leads to a colorful and inaccurate interpretation of male male anal sex It is not the most straight forward way to explain pleasure from male receptive anal sexit is factually and logically a roundabout way to do it and it is misleading Really that s what the issue is As I have several times mentioned the only thing that is relevant to anal sex is that prostate stimulation can be pleasureable it s homology with the Skene s gland is completely irrelevant Also do you think that the psychological factor plays no role in receptive pleasure I personally think that it plays a larger role than the prostate does but it isn t mentioned once in the article