13 April 2006 UTC Hi Heah Thanks for your reply First I wrongly assumed that Jossi had started the deletions He just joined in and was the one who reported me for reverting I didn t know that there was an edit log that tracked all activity but someone showed me afterward I still maintain however that these deletions were indeed acts of vandalism They weren t corroborative edits that s for sure They were as I said wholesale repeated deletions of original text You speculate that the problem might have been my lack of citations but in this case I can assure you that s not the problem Jossi s full aware of the fact that both Geaves comments and Rawat s own contradictory words in his letter inviting his followers to the Millenium festival are proven and accurate Here s a link to the Geaves article Footnote 5 is the one where Geaves relieves Rawat of any knowledge or responsibility for the Millenium hype And here s a link to the letter Rawat himself wrote which clearly puts the lie to Geaves revisionism The Wiki rule about vandalism states that most is dealt with by fast reversions However it doesn t say that persistent efforts in this regard may nonetheless violate the three reversion rule and trigger blocking It does seem a little Kafak esque don t you think Finally on the more general complaint I have about Jossi Fresco I do invite you to take some time if you would and review his editing of the Rawat articles He is a paid web guy for a person who is most certainly a cult leader a man who still has many many followers who believe that he is God in human form Jossi is adept at using Wikipedia to ensure that the articles never truly capture the story of the man The fact that he s a Wikipedia administrator is worrying in my opinion 18 13