Bottom line here and this is likely not your fault is addressed to whom So tell me what those intentions were Don t you see everyone is jumping the gun My assumption was that content disputes don t give a anti homeopathy editor rights over a pro homeopathy editor Since the probation warning yesterday I have not touched the Deadly Nightshade article However an anti homeopathy editor has reverted twice in the span of a few hours without any consensus He has ignored editors on the talk page that are trying to work towards an agreement Before yesterday I would have reverted his edit at least once But due to the warning I avoided the article page and focus my attention on the talk page Instead of touching the talk page I brought the issue to AN I What have I done wrong