To jmabel ad hominem I had no idea who wrote the original text and I do nt care who Dahn is I was describing a superficial course of events someone consistently removes reference to Moldova without apparent reason while keeping reference to Romania especially funny was logic no pieces of moldavia are not in moldova but in bessarabia which easily reads there is no moldova there is part of romania stolen by russia no You yourself wrote enormous vocabulary difficulty here My point exactly Conflation of two different although related topics in a single article only contributes to this difficulty Putting two sloppy text into one page does not help understanding The topics are perfectly separable along the timeline mikkanarxi