That was me I struck it late last night my time at the end of a big edit but didn t want to start this discussion and then sign off It shows up the synthesis nicely Eugene compared to you I know nothing about this stuff I came here because it was mentioned at Fringe Theories and it looked interesting I thought I might learn something I have a moderate level of interest in the early church I ve read Crossan s Essential Jesus 1989 Historical Jesus 1993 and Jesus A Revolutionary Biography 1994 Robin Lane Fox s Pagans and Christians 1988 and The Unauthorized Version 1992 Robert Miller s ed The Complete Gospels Annotated Scholars Version 1994 Funk Hoover Jesus Seminar s The Five Gospels 1993 Ian Wilson s Jesus The Evidence 1984 A N Wilson s Jesus 1992 Michael Goulder s A Tale of Two Missions 1994 Robert Eisenman s James the Brother of Jesus 1997 and Elaine Pagels Gnostic Gospels can t lay my hands on it for the date Not very closely and a long time ago So my knowledge is general I am relying on you and others for the specialist information that will make this a good article What I have brought here is a critical mind and an understanding of policy honed in editing a few medical articles where precision clarity and neutrality are crucial When I called this article crap the other day I was judging it on those criteria It is not clear and not neutral so I doubt its veracity as will anyone with half a mind who reads it It is a bad article If you want it to be good or featured I recommend you welcome me SV and the many other good editors who come here It could be at GA in two weeks