I think you need to look at our standards for temporary notability it isn t a bit more closely You made the newbie error of blanking references because their host website had since 404 ed which you then compounded by blanking the para they supported We don t do this we tag refs with and then or simultaneously we see if they re recoverable Both of these were trivially so It took me less time to do this useful minor task than it did to revert your edit warring and pointless argument here If the situation has changed then by all means update the statement about the current state of the bridge That might use these refs it might not However blanking sections because of a 404 is never the way to progress forwards I do not have any special connection with either the bridge Runcorn or the YMCA Nor am I required to have them before editing this article