I haven t even read his latest reply at User talk 142 161 182 190 Maybe I will read it a few days later and reply then But it s fruitless replying to him because he s so stuck on the fact that he s right even in the face of overwhelming evidence that he s wrong He thinks like this He doesn t understand at all that we follow what the sources say except for when it suits him And that he insists that the information in the Lesbianism in erotica article about studies showing that men are more sexually aroused by lesbian pornography than heterosexual pornography makes my head hurt He acts like we are presenting opinions as fact when all we are really do is presenting the findings of several studies not one but several In his opinion we shouldn t include this information because he doesn t consider the evidence strong enough Yet he considers just googl ing the most purchased adult videos see ing what they re about and this would correspond to male arousal quite well to be strong enough evidence Most heterosexual men buying heterosexual porn doesn t mean that most heterosexual men are more turned on by heterosexual porn than lesbian porn Regarding everything else Writ Keeper your but it was not to be wording made me laugh Thanks for that Dennis Brown I saw your advice for User MikeFromCanmore at User talk 142 161 183 162 You certainly do give the benefit of the doubt but being open to giving someone a second chance is generally a good personality trait to have As for User MikeFromCanmore still posting as IPs I feel that his posts should just be removed each time he posts them unless posting them on his own talk page By leaving his posts elsewhere he is repeatedly getting his way I ve considered getting a registered account but would rather not no comment on why that is 220 255 2 133