I suppose I can only reiterate that it was Goldstein s entire point that the positions she were taking in her Council campaign were not inherently radical but that she holds views that are He then provided a specific example her making the economic argument for collectivizing Amazon that falls in line with the positions she taken on the record criticizing the private investor ownership of corporations I m unsure a more logical way to read the passage The passage in the article is a verbatim reflection of that portion of the article To project hypothetical hypotheticals onto the passage doesn t make sense to me