Citations Some wikipedians feel that lists should have a citation for each member in the list I m unsure and hence I m soliciting opinions feedback If you look at the article page you will see that I have put a LOT of effort into adding citations Is this necessary On another page in another conversation two experienced editors have commented adding citations does make it easier if someone tries to slip a hoax in particularly while quite a lot of the naems are redlinks and there isn t a requirement to have all citations for all the members in the list As long as every member is covered by a general reference then that is fine This is mainly used to cover lists from books where every individual reference is to the same two pages in a book If there is an individual page for each officer then individual references would work well Regards Please add your 2c worth Thanks in advance