I did not revert TheOldJacobite s edits at all you need to read the actual history properly and you ll note that he started all this by removing my new additional line entry and at no time did I remove any of TheOldJacobian s original page text simply added to it Why hasn t he been similarly blocked for 3RR or is it just one rule for one and another for those with friends in Wikimadmin I added a fully policy correct entry only to have TheOldJacobite arbitrarily remove it and HE HAS according to his discipline record done this before I on the other hand was simply adding a notable entry in accordance with what was required And yes I did read the WP SONGCOVER However TheOldJacobite seems to think he owns this page and did everything to feed me incorrect information about policy I checked and confirmed that he was making up clauses of policy that simply did not exist and then tried to have me blocked and the page locked a decision which Mark Arsten did not uphold I d like this matter now referred to Mark and an impartial review of the edit made again as it would seem that your own blocking of my account on this is very one sided and is in itself an arbitrary decision that needs to be referred to a higher authority within the Foundation David Biddulph s referral for blocking is highly skewed as it does not include the background reasons for me having to protect my edit from the continual vandalistic behaviour of TheOldJacobite or Sjo He not surprisingly skews the request by only mentioning 3RR and not requesting an impartial review of the entire matter If that had been done properly as per Wiki edit warring policy then a sanction against both parties should have been enforced It is no wonder that new editors are leaving Wikipedia in droves when they are treated as inferior contributors and those editors who have a rather chequered past TheOldJacobite s general behaviour is logged as public information seems to be ignored as if their arbitrary an non policy deletions are sacrosanct I wonder if we ll see the matter referred to Mark Arsten as requested or whether the appeal process is simply ignored As this is a formal appeal I understand that I can request the matter to be reviewed by another admin who did effect the block Therefore please ask Mark Arsten to review the entire matter Thank you P S As the matter of taking on three editors sometimes it takes people like me to stand up to gangs of bullies who are all simply taking personal actions against a newbie and wholly contradicting the very policies that they purport to uphold I wonder if TheOldJacobite and Sjo are now deleting every unreferenced cover on the entire Wiki content as it will take them about 60 years to do so