This is what prompted my question in the last post I ve said it before and I ll say it again this is not a source issue I m not arguing for the inclusion of anything Here s another question What sources should I be giving you It s a policy issue the sources are policy Besides you say things should be based on sources yet there are no sources that say antisemitic canard As for the categories you mentioned the first two don t have judgments of right or wrong or true or false in the definition Hoax is different than canard because it does not imply that it s totally right or totally wrong Additionally hoaxes usually have a single or a few conspirators when the antisemitic ZOG is alleged by several different independent groups A canard and a hoax are certainly not the same thing at all On top of all that the use of the word canard is unencyclopedic editorializing And just for the record it certainly is a personal attack Even if it s veiled as a summary of my contribution log an inaccurate summary mind you I ve written several articles and made the majority of my edits on topics that have nothing to do with ZOG the holocaust etc it s still a personal attack Please talk about the issue at hand not about the editor Talk Email