defined structure including a lead section and one or more sections of content B Class 3 yes B Class 4 yes B Class 5 yes A Class fail past collaboration 3 April 2006 16 April 2006 ARW task force yes US task force yes British task force yes French task force yes Dutch task force yes nested yes Preceding unsigned comment added by 75 80 128 139 Notice This article focuses on the military campaign while the American Revolution covers the origins of the war as well as other social and political issues Please try to keep this article at a reasonable length The current approach has been to summarize the war in a way that will be clearly understandable to the general reader without cluttering it up with too many details Concentrate on the major figures and actions and try to leave detailed discussion of war strategies battle casualties historical debates etc to linked articles about specific battles or actions Instead of adding additional detail to this lengthy article consider adding your information to an article on a specific battle or to one of these campaign articles currently in development Additionally one campaign Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War after Saratoga box at right does not yet have an article specifically about those operations Perhaps you will start it Miguel Boston campaign 1775 76 Invasion of Canada 1775 1775 77 New York and New Jersey campaign 1776 77 Saratoga campaign 1777 Philadelphia campaign 1777 78 Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War after Saratoga 1778 81 Sullivan Expedition 1779 Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War 1775 83 Western theater of the American Revolutionary War 1779 82 West Indies and Gulf Coast campaigns 1775 82 Naval operations in the American Revolutionary War American Waters 1775 82 European Waters 1778 82 West Indies 1778 82 East Indies 1778 83 NPOV Reading this article it looks like the US won the war solo with some assistance which was mostly inept from some other countries one of which happened to be France This is evident in the introduction and throughout the article The introduction is particularly blatant mentioning non American intervention only as an after thought Should the WWI and WWII articles mention American intervention as an afterthought too Am I the only one to think this is a problem I have edited the intro so that it is less laughable I agree especially Yorktown Casualties I think that the casualty figures in this article are incorrect as 25 000 Americans died in all and 24 000 British and their allies Americans naturally fickle and disloyal in 2008 Do you think it would be fair to suggest that Americ