I am blocked for making personal attack i wonder what are these last one is an abuse the statement in question was in response to a threat by the same user Renee which was noted as something which could escalate into legal threat by another user here my response that the concern person appears to be mentally unstable or a paid member of the group was based on my short discussion with her about a topic i noticed that she did not wanted any information to be presented on wikipedia about that particular group taking help from admins who have declared their WP COI Other user s also noted that Renee s approach is threating My stand is not restricted to any particular group or person but my concern is more about the direction wikipedia is moving into as noted before the talk page of the concern topic is now deleted my objection remains same there was a link on that page which pointed towards previously deleted article and i noticed comments from 4 member s only one was user Jossi who has admitted that he is on pay role of prem rawat second was from User Bksimonb who works in PR team of brahma Kumari both of these user s have admitted their direct involvement with the respective groups third person was User Reneeholle fourth user was Don Renee has not admitted her paid involvement with this particular group but her edit behavior clearly showed the same Moreover there is NOT A SINGLE NOTE FROM ME ON HER TALK PAGE as i simply ignored her threating messages which were moving more towards legal threat as noted by more then one wikipedia editor I suspect her paid involvement with the group while we were working on a temp page about the subject on advice of another admin User Will Beback and there one statement was made that there is dispute between two groups and reference given was court docket which was taken as it is from wikipedia s french twin of the subject She removed the dispute section from temp page and stated that judgment is in favor of one party and reference given was some blog Giving reference of a blog after removing a court docket from a temp page indicates some problem or something fishy This heavy biasing and attempt to reduce information from wikipedia is harmful for future prospectives of wikipedia project As the talk page which i am referring to has already been deleted so there is no trace of that particular discussion left if this tendency of curbing information from paid member s of corresponding groups is not checked it may lead wikipedia into a wrong direction or may be in that direction which is not intended My direct involvement with article s is bare minimum mostly i am on talk pages discussing the matter and letting informed people make the edits once it is agreed Regarding calling a group a cult is something which is based in WP RS if there is a reliable source which refers a group as cult I write honestly that the group is cult as per this particular WP RS and hence respective member s are referred to as cult member s I did not filed any personal attack request at notice board for all the abuses made against me for the simple reason that i believe that editor s are free to make comments whatever they feel is appropriate even for abuses that were placed at either my user page or talk page i have never taken the matter beyond placing the link for the same But I am surprise to see that a comment in response to statement made on my talk page by another user about first user can tantamount to personal attack given the fact when it is made for a genuine concern that the said thread appears to be legal in nature My statement was either she is a paid member or mentally sick as i could not find any other reason for such threats when t