29 August 2006 wow i understand that the sentance I added was not crucial and really does not change the content But what is this has the community not gotten smaller was it not caused by the automobile have I not sourced the statement as asked is it not a fact is it not information does it not help inform people as to why foresters falls is not as large as it seemingly once was is it not the only peice of information in the article that bridges the span of time between 1870 and present is the usfullness of the edit the only criteria used to determine if it will be reverted or not if so it should be noted that I simply re added the information after it was removed was not the removal frivilous and unwarranted what is the problem why insist on the absence of this statement it is unjustifiable it is negligible I am re adding the information as it is A factual B sourced and C informative I assume that since there is no reason to remove it again or in the first place that you and all other Wiki Nazis will relax If you are concerned with useless edits please see the edit fom the 26th I know it was carried out by the great infallable Mindmatrix but imho that was the first useless change