yes they are controlled access highways I m the one that bothered to find the statute of which you were ignorant and yet you try to lecture me on statutory construction Let me know when you ve argued a couple cases before the US Court of Appeals or even a state Court of Appeals and then I ll take you a little more seriously The parts that you left out were Definitions 1 In this Act highway includes a common and public highway street avenue parkway driveway square place bridge viaduct trestle or any other structure incidental thereto any part of which is intended for or used by the general public for the passage of vehicles and includes the area between the lateral property lines thereof voie publique PART II CONTROLLED ACCESS HIGHWAYS Controlled access highway designation 36 1 The Lieutenant Governor in Council may designate any a highway or b proposed highway as a controlled access highway and every highway so designated shall be deemed to be part of the King s Highway and the provisions of this Act and the regulations that apply to the King s Highway apply with necessary modifications to such controlled access highway The other sections of the Act are entitled PART III SECONDARY HIGHWAYS Secondary highways designation 40 The Lieutenant Governor in Council may designate any highway as a secondary highway and thereupon Part I and all the other provisions of this Act and the regulations that apply to the King s Highway apply with necessary modifications to such secondary highway R S O 1990 c P 50 s 40 PART IV TERTIARY ROADS Tertiary roads designation 41 1 The Lieutenant Governor in Council may designate an existing road that is in whole or in part in territory without municipal organization as a tertiary road and thereupon the provisions of this Act and the regulations that apply to the King s Highway except sections 33 and 34 apply with necessary modifications to such tertiary road R S O 1990 c P 50 s 41 1 They are all King s Highway even tertiary dirt roads