I agree its a better picture for the article my concern is purely on the copyright side of things I remember this problem when I created the first version of the article I couldn t find a good picture that wasn t potentially copyright It s a challenge for photographs that might be around 1900 in date Where we don t have a photographer s name it is quite plausible that they may have been taken say by a 20 year old who could easily have lived to seventy in which case the lifetime 70 years of copyright protection won t run out until 2020 depending on the exact date of the photo With a photo with a firmer date e g 1880s we d be on somewhat safer ground but as you say the website isn t giving an indication there