Bovine emissions and suspected Scibaby accounts As far as I can see this edit violated no policies I checked the source which is reliable and the edit appeared to be faithful to the source s information I understand that Scibaby had a fixation on bovine emissions threatening humanity but you don t know for sure that it was a Scibaby account You apparently blocked the account because it had an interest in a subject that was the same as a banned editor Do you think that perhaps blocks in these types of situations should be handled by editors who aren t regular contributors to the Global Warming articles