My point exactly berlet is adding extensive unsourced original research Cberlet is adding extensive orginal research and wildly POV assertions regarding his 20 year old claims that simply are not borne out by the references All assertions to the effect that Berlet subsequently found out the evil cultists were lying that are not references are simply self serving original research and are being removed unless berlet can find a reference to support the claim As well the angry POV tone of Berlet s edits are being removed and I suggest cberlet not use an encyclopedia entry as a vehicle for angry OR POV statements As to the response from Newman s organization to Clouds Blur the Rainbow Berlet himself in the discussion above says There are many publications from the BLP issue deleted ie Newmanites that have criticized Clouds Blur the Rainbow An NPOV entry will include criticisms from Clouds Blur the Rainbow and then criticisms of the criticism in Clouds from the various BLP issue deleted ie Newmanites publications But when the response was added he and King keep deleting it claiming it is gossip while adding three paragrpah from a gossipy letter to the editor from 20 years ago which is considered research Come on now fellas