Given that you don t provide any actual content but seem to spend all your time formatting articles and reverting people I suppose I oughtn t expect you to understand that the vast majority of content on wikipedia starts off unsourced Wikipedia moves forward by sourcing unsourced material not by removing it It certainly doesn t move forward by removing trivially verifiable information like my Niger Congo languages edit that you reverted in which I merely added a statement that most of the languages of central southern and eastern Africa are Bantu I apologize for the vulgar edit summary in my revert I was irritated I stand by the contention made there that it was a total WP POINT violation