Please don t use antisemitic claptrap as a source Please don t insult Wikipedia readers and editors by sourcing opinionated statements with antisemitic claptrap found on Rense com Are you really expecting editors to find Goebbelesque garbage like The multi faceted assault on MacDonald s position as a tenured professor is a chilling reminder of the level of Jewish excess and Jewish tenacity Americans are now facing acceptable as a WP RS Preceding unsigned comment added by talk contribs What s wrong with the source Discussion contribs Oh and where did you get the insult Wikipedia readers and editors from Are you some kind of automatically self offended dude You seem to think everything is offensive How is a source offensive How does a website having opinions critical of Jewish behaviour fail WP RS Are you suggesting that WP RS can only be applied on sources which can not have critical opinions about Jews What if the website is actually telling the truth though opinionated Don t you think it s ignorant to disregard it on the basis that it has opinions you disagree with Discussion contribs You seem to think everything is offensive Actually no not everything just ill informed blanket generalizations about other people s state of mind What if the antisemitic claptrap you used as a source is true you ask Hey could be oh look a pig just flew by my window Wow that was really funny Anyway MacDonald has been attacked several times by American Jews for allegedly being antisemite you know that awesome word which has any actual academic value beside shutting down legitimate criticism of Jews This for instance in FrontPageMag by Jacob Laksin He has come under a lot of heat from the SPLC which I m sure you re already aware of Now recently the SPLC has been pushing to get him dissociated from his university All this has that rense source which you eloquently call antisemitic claptrap covered I don t see the problem here It seems to me you dismiss this rense source as a WP RS not because of any false writings but because there are opinions you dislike and deem insulting Discussion contribs Dude the term antisemite has no actual academic value beside shutting down legitimate criticism of Jews Do me a favor please don t discuss anything with me regarding your views on theis subject and stick SOLELY to discussion of editing and improving this artcile because your views are simply too offensive and abhorrent to have to volunarily subject myself to By the way I edited the entry to reflect what the College newspaper actually reports which is that the moves against Macdonald are a result of opposition from school faculty Despite the fact that bigots like rense like to whine about how evil Jews are persecuting antisemites like Macdonald I m afraid the professor has only himself to blame Sorry but I m not here to appease your getting offended radar If you feel offended every single time someone is critical of Jews such as Kevin MacDonald you have a serious emotional problem or you re probably Jewish MacDonald has himself to blame Wrong MacDonald has written three scholarly books on Jews Judaism and Jewish political movements That s his right to do so if he wants to and he should not get into trouble because of it since last I checked the 1st amendment was still valid in America or so they say What next You want to criminalise political criticism of Jews too Anyway this is what the source states MacDonald s three part series