The problem with this disambig is Michael that it links to events in history that barely can be called a Polish invasion on Russia for instance as there was no Russia in today meaning of the word and they show rather a Russian Ghirlandajo s POV Without any disclamer term used in Russian historiography a reader can think we claim that they were Polish invasions on Russia what is not exactly my view That s the main problem and Ghirlandajo s insults and his weak explanations afterwards that he was understood wrongly yeah right only make finding a good solution more difficult Best