RE RexxS That wasn t what I said My concern is that Sasata has said It s pretty obvious I don t think it meets the criteria 3a comprehensiveness and it s also pretty obvious that we have different opinions about the comprehensiveness criterion In its current state I would fail on that basis In agreeing with her opinon do you agree with her statement about comprehensiveness My expertise and the reviewer s expertise in this field are not at issue the issue is the misapplication of assessment criteria Such as issue is independent of the topic of the article