8 December 2010 UTC This to SarekOfVulcan I tried to discuss this civilized but I was talking to walls I would say something the editor something else but not addressing my question or point In my opinion if you don t accept what I wanted to say regarding softpedia without a reference from a trusted entity you should delete also Softpedia words related to how they diligently check all their software to make sure that no viruses malware are attached Why you don t do that On what reputable verifiable source is based their assertion You said that Wikipedia doesn t advertise it is independent If you obey this policy an article from a profit business like softpedia should say only this is who we are this is what we do this is who uses us and that s it nothing related to how they do it As soon as you accept that plug in that s advertising with no verifiable trusted sourse You don t accept counter argument opinion to their assertion w out verificable sourse that is equal with Wikipedia being biased Can you dialog with me regarding to what I just said as you mention before Thank you 22 31