Jack A Roe thank you for responding That article says Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation That raises a question In writing the article I paraphrased the Material well some of it It seems to me that paraphrasing is necessary when conveying information I mean Seth Roberts published 20 books and when they discussed a topic it was discussed in depth So my question is Is paraphrasing considered to be interpretation To me it is not interpretation but others might say it is It would seem that Verbal thinks I am interpreting instead of paraphrasing But since he isn t a knowledgeable editor meaning an editor with knowledge of the subject matter I don t see how he can know that Verbal acting on the assumption that I have been interpreting instead of paraphrasing has been trying to block any new primary sources that I might add Now the article also says that primary sources must be used with care but it doesn t say that they can t be used in abundance In a case like this I don t see why the sections that describe the Material can t be abundantly sourced to the Seth books I really do have a handicap when it comes to finding secondary sources what I ve been calling third party sources up to now I have always been interested in the Seth material not metaphysics in general Thus I have almost all the Seth books but few other books on metaphysical subjects where references to Seth Roberts might occur I do have many Cayce and Casteneda books but they don t say a thing about Seth Finding more secondary sources is difficult for me because my town has a small library and you ll be amazed by this I don t have a car to drive to the nearest city However it seems to me that given the sale of 8 million books and the secondary references that are already in the article notability has already been established Because I was the only person here who was able to keep reverting Verbal s cuts to the article I am now being accused of edit warring There s the possibility that I won t be around to prevent Verbal from chop chop chopping at the article That being the case I hope you ll stick around