I would just add that unless a stub is clearly vanity or garbage adding a VfD within minutes after the entry is posted is not a very good practice for several reasons While schools are inherently controversial here at Wikipedia I would urge you to apply the same wait and see approach across the board The whole purpose of a stub is to act as an invitation to create an article Frequently it is difficult to tell whether the subject is encyclopedic I have seen many good articles start as stubs For example a stub may start as John Q Unknown was an American politician and it may turn out that he was a Territorial governor U S Senator and later president of a well known college Unless the subject of a stub is very well known it is a rare stub that gives enough detail to know immediately whether the subject has the potential to become encylcopedic You may have already seen these but I would refer you to Wikipedia Stub and Wikipedia Deletion policy The deletion policy states that among the problems which do not require deletion are a stub with potential which should be expanded or a minor branch of a subject that doesn t deserve its own article which should be merged with a redirect to the new location