Dear Sir Wikipedia s rules for protecting a page do not make a provision for using the tool on an editor s talk page especially when the protect is used as an added punishment One must wonder at the complete lack of moral fiber displayed when an administrator improperly utilizes a protect on an editor s talk page after repeat after said editor had been blocked from further editing This violation of wikipedia s rules was further compounded by the administrator s failure to withdraw the protection for nearly 24 hours after the block itself was removed In an attempt to cover up this error the same administrator added the comments that he was removing the block when in fact he was actually removing the protection This gives rise to the notion that administrators who violate wikipedia rules are immune to sanction by their peers This safe harbor must give the vengeful administrator the feeling of great power Sad true and very funny PS Would you please ask administrators and editors who seek to enforce the laws of capitalization to at least spell the word correctly when they chastise the violator