You Could Present The Simple Solutions As Simple Elegant But Only Useful In Certain Cases The reliable sources that point out that the simple solutions don t generalize when certain assumptions are changed do not have to be considered critics Rather the Wikipedia article could introduce the simple solutions as wonderfully accessible devices to explain the 2 3 1 3 vs 50 50 paradox of door 1 and door 3 because of the unique premises of the problem It would be very useful to point out that if certain premises were changed one might need a tool that can handle the complexities of conditional problems unlike the 100 likelihood of revealing a goat behind another door Then refer the reader to a section which gives voice to the reliable sources who offer up a host bias or the random Monty or whatever to explain to the interested reader what a conditional problem looks like