I m not going to revert your last edits however there are some things that I want to point out It doesn t matter whether this band is an extraordinary case or not These need still a source and Rate My Music and similar user operated websites have zero validity as a source What you are doing now is adding genres according to your original research and your point is mostly based on this Also whether another band page has sourced genres or not is not relevant this must be necessary especially for this sort of controversial articles If you have any objections against the guideline then you may open a discussion on the talk pages However you are currently doing whatever you desire and disregard every set of rule I understand that you re doing this for the article s good and indeed the rules can be breakable if necessary However I am really baffled at your persistence on keeping the genres without any discussion or consensus even after this amount of controversy it has generated I don t really think having around 65 genres on the infobox without any sort of necessary prose or explanation in the article body would be useful at all especially for the readers And yes you are right You are definitely editing the page with a fan s perspective