I regret that it has been changed back I think I have written a clear and correct representation of metahysical libertarianism Now the passage seems to say again that metaphysical libertarians require a belief in a soul This is a falsehood of such magnitude which can not pass To require a belief in a soul and implicitly require belief in God is anti democratic anti freedom anti emotion anti religion Very clearly in metaphysical libertarianism the way to arrive at a conclusion about an agent is by free belief I have quoted 2 metaphysical libertarian philosophers previously going out of their way saying that they are opposed to evidence even against philosophical evidence in coming to a conclusion about the agent But really ALL late medieval monks are generally considered to be metaphysical libertarians It is also quite obvious that religion centers around FAITH not around evidence gathering So I think I have made a fair and correct representation of common metaphysical libertarianism But on the other side I do feel I need more support from people here on wiki that what I wrote is a correct and fair representation of common metaphysical libertarian position Think this through is the way in which metaphysical libertarianists reach a conclusion about an agent a free way or a way forced by evidence Syamsu Preceding unsigned comment added by 80 57 25 110