I agree with the above summary In my view this is a textbook example of when not to force the article s title into the lead 2011 Tucson shooting isn t a widely accepted name for the incident As noted in the GA review there isn t even strong consensus to use it as the article s title And unlike cases such as Inaugural games of the Flavian Amphitheatre the phrase doesn t arise naturally when referring to the event In normal speech no one would state that the 2011 Tucson shooting was a shooting that occurred near Tucson in 2011 or similar WP SBE explains the reasoning behind the guideline