Those sources might be interesting to those working on the Unitarianism and Trinity articles but in general I agree that it s a little much for this one The manner in which it s presented is also problematic it would appear the statements are being made in Wikipedia s voice not in the source s voice This could be solved by properly attributing the claims rather than stating them as simple fact X Y and Z conclude that ABC not just ABC is how it is I think that the texts being sourced are worth a short mention here but with more NPOV work done to them