I think our readers need to know that Lynn has exhibited scandalous disregard for scientific objectivity according to a review in Scientific American a mainstream scientific news source satisfying WP RS In my mind that calls into question his entire body of work not merely his work on African IQ To claim otherwise strikes me as disingenuous and tendentious I might add that to devote so much space to Schockley Lynn and Weyl and Possony would seem to me to violate the undue weight section of WP NPOV since dysgenics in non humans its main use is barely covered in the article That along with the lack of critical comment on Weyl and Possony justify the NPOV tag I think talk