Agreed a timeline would be helpful perhaps a comparative timeline that shows events from both the perspective of the attackee and the attacker The major problem I see in doing this is that using only secondary sources which I assume is desired will result in an attackee timeline for events during the attack that s composed largely of McGonagle s recall of the attack i e COI findings about events during the attack and their sequence are almost exclusively based on McGonagle s testimony and the NSA History Report used the COI findings as a reference source So for the attackee the timeline may represent the official view as reported in NSA s History Report but its base information source McGonagle testimony can be easily shown as being fraught with errors Nonetheless as long it s made clear to readers that the timeline is based on secondary sources and that there is contention about the reliably of the secondary sources references then I suppose it would be a fair representation of the matter