What is going on here From Wikipedia Articles for deletion Major Garrett Delete Not sure why an article that short needed to be posted it s obvious that only minimal effort went into its creation There s reams of data available about Garrett and his career an hour or so with Google at the very least would have created the basis for a pretty good article so this one doesn t have any justification for existence Duncan1800 talk In other words there are reams of information about this person It has the potential to be a pretty good article with about an hour s work Therefore it doesn t have any justification for existence Is this type of thought process the norm on Wikipedia these days