I didn t really have a problem with the edits except one but I don t feel very strongly about that one However I do object with not having this stuff on the talk page Since I wrote the article researched it rewrote it researched it again and keep adding as I find out more the man is elusive he s probably the most important figure of the 18th c to be a complete ghost in reference works I keep it on my watchlist Any breath and I d see it Originally it seems that it needed to go to a higher standard because of sections Sheesh man but that s an insulting message for an article under heavy research and revision like that Anyway Please break it into subsections would have gotten the sections done had it been on the talk page Instead though It s a sub optimal method at best No one should tag without extremely clear wording and they shouldn t do that until the talk page has failed