The wording you are trying to force into the article is simply ridiculous I assumed it was some sort of joke on your part at first but it really seems you re serious And it seems that editors like you who don t understand basic policy are no longer uncommon here I see that someone reverted that edit that you point out to restore a copyright violation into the article I don t really know what to say to you other than that described by X as being best known for being Y instead of Y is an obviously ridiculous way to introduce the subject of an article Is it that you can t understand that or that you won t 190 46 98 195