Query I suppose I should have taken the point better when you made it here This is neither a challenge a complaint nor a whine or an attempt to gotcha but a ood faith question and a related comment on which I d like your observations Question John Bapst Memorial High School 2005 was nominated not by me and subsequently deleted yesterday under A7 I think that s the one not being a sysop ahem I can t go back to look to make sure The entire text of the article was something like Composed of people born in 1986 and 1987 Said to be the best class to ever graduate from this school As I understand from the discussions at Talk CSD an indication of importance or significance is credible if it is plausible even if it is vague and unsupported That school s class of 2005 could in fact have been the best to graduate from that school in many different ways highest GPA most athletic championships fewest teenage pregnancies or in a 5 year retrospect most graduates to be admitted to Ivy League schools None of that is of course probably what the creator meant which was probably nothing more than chauvinistic chest thumping but we must AGF Was that an indication of importance or significance such that the article should not have been A7 nominated or deleted on that basis Comment If I were to start declining A7 speedy noms by strictly applying the criteria you set out at my RfA nomination viz A7 simply does not apply if there is any credible indication of importance or significance then I have the suspicion that at my next RfA nomination if I choose to try again and your responses here may help me decide whether or not I will do so that I may have a hoard of opposers claiming that I m perverting the CSD process by glibly dismissing valid CSD nominations I m concerned that by working on CSD nominations at all that I m stuck between the battle lines drawn by the deletionists and the inclusionists If I have any remaining desire for the mop wouldn t it be better to just avoid CSD altogether Best regards TALK