GWH I understand that my edit summaries were inappropriate and if you blocked me for that reason only I would not complain However you mentioned disregard for talk page consensus Here you can see that my request for sources to be verified devolves into Ramdrake requiring me to find a quote from the cites stating the opposite of what it s supposed to support and refusing to provide a quote supporting the statement in question Also false and hypocritical allegations of IDIDN THERETHAT trolling OR twist ing legitimate sources to try to make them say the opposite of what they re actually saying and a claim that out of field scholars are more reliable because they are more secondary Is this how consensus is formed on WP How sad