Guilt by innuendo Let us say that I establish an organization you can figure out why whose sole purpose is to register and treat victims of physical abuse by you as reported by your neighbors and family And then strangely enough report that indeed 90 of the victims reports are guess what by you Golly QED None of this however would be proof by a constitutionally mandated impartial judicial authority that you were indeed guilty of anything except a victim of a blatant smear by me The Austalia organisation kind of falls into that category It is not in itself scholarly in any way and doesn t belong here nor do it s comments We won t even get into the Burden of Proof logical fallacy where since it is impossible for anyone to prove themselves innocent here no accusations being levied they must therefore be guilty of something Begging the question fallacy There are probably several others