16 June 2009 UTC I don t disagree in principle with anything you ve written above I would have no problem with a much stricter notability policy that favored importance over other concerns However what you or I might prefer takes or should take a back seat to what is And what is does not require so stringent a standard at least the way I read the current notability standards In my view David Boothroyd met these standards though barely so even before the minor scandal After it I think there s no question he does While I share your concerns regarding the future of such articles the article as it currently stands in userspace presents no viable BLP concerns as far as I can tell On a tangent I am actually considering reworking the notability standards in a way that addresses your concerns above as my first Wikipedia space project There are so many nobodies that have articles currently that I think this is a rather necessary change As this would be a major shift I don t plan on working on it on the actual page but using a sandbox of some sort Could you advise me as to both the feasibility of taking on such a project as well as how to creat a draft like CoM s current Boothroyd article Thanks Unitanode 16 05