Undent The other wikipedias do nt call it a massacre because their sources do not call it a massacre Arabic sources overwhelmingly do call it a massacre and thus the wiki being a product of its sources the article is called the gaza massacre This whole time you have been arguing that arabs should nt be calling it a massacre that the facts do nt support such a claim That opinion whether valid or not is not what determines the name of an article it is what the common name in the language for the event that determines the name You can not argue that the 2 wikis are discussing the same event so to then argue that because of the common name for said event is in your mind and understandably so non neutral that we should then censor that undermines core principles of the wikis Yes the wiki should server to convey facts and hopefully transfer knowledge but what we think are facts are almost always perceptions of facts It boggles my mind that something that should be as trivial as asking what is the common term associated with an event in a given language needs to be so difficult If arabs are calling this event the gaza massacre then surprise the name of the article will be the gaza massacre