Re review GA review see WP WIAGA for criteria Is it reasonably well written A Prose quality B MoS compliance if The lead section is still a bit short and could use some expanding WP LEAD recommends that an article of about this size should have one to two paragraphs I think this one can easily support two You have done some good work in expanding what the lead covers The lead section is still a bit short and could use some expanding WP LEAD recommends that an article of about this size should have one to two paragraphs I think this one can easily support two You have done some good work in expanding what the lead covers Is it factually accurate and verifiable A References to sources B Citation of reliable sources where necessary C No original research Is it broad in its coverage A Major aspects B Focused Is it neutral Fair representation without bias Is it stable No edit wars etc Does it contain images to illustrate the topic A Images are copyright tagged and non free images have fair use rationales B Images are provided where possible and appropriate with suitable captions Overall Pass or Fail if Well done This can now be called a Good Article Keep up the good work and consider a peer review and this should be up to Featured Article Status soon With so much history behind this market it should definitely be an attainable goal c Well done This can now be called a Good Article Keep up the good work and cons