Inverted Ad Hominen is non notable When I correct the ad hominem article later I m zapping the inverted ad hominem term It is completely non notable 86 hits in google and was invented and inserted into the article by User Layman Heck the article itself even attributes it to Layman a random web user as having said it Original edit inserting it under an ip address Edit by User Layman the same day There s a reason why the term wasn t invented by logicians too because inverted ad hominem is still ad hominem There s no inverse about it The so called inverse ad hominem is just a case of ad hominem where someone says my qualifications are better than yours instead of directly saying your qualifications suck The meaning is the same and there is no reason for another term I really don t think there is any question that this and the silly thing about it being coined should be removed 6 July 2005 17 19 UTC