which originally appeared in the London Independent on August 13 2002 is I think excellent in both sensitively disputing the official account of Flight 93 and highlighting the US media s reluctance to do so I am unaware if the titular questions have been answered in the past three years or whether the journalist s sources have since been discredited Cberlet as you seem confident that they have been do please provide proof Please note though my point is NOT that this article should be rewritten to claim that the flight was shot down or even that the possibility should be mentioned simply that inserting The 9 11 commission determined that would make this article more objective in places Does anyone think these words word make it objectionable