You re mixing apples and oranges historical scholarship is not required for Wikipedia to add information say on a claim to the Bosnian throne Sorry no one has claimed the Croatia s yet To add that information to the list of many other claimants around the world does not require approval from the pope but it does reqire that the claimant has A in fact made the claim and that B news sources reported on it that are considered respectable in that country Since the news source we re talking about here are online Alexa is the criterion for their as any other online ranking of news portals because their high position in Alexa means high readership In the news business this is how you measure success The sources that reported on the claim are not tabloids but conventional news portals as anyone can see etc Please be respectful others have brains and eyes too and stop the edit war Thanks for the diagram If you look at it closely you ll realize you re not even attempting to compromise meaning you re the one not following WP EDITCONSENSUS Instead you keep making total reverts canceling entire edits which took hours of someone s valuable time without ever discussing it in Talk By being so obviously rude you also remove dozens of reliable references such as in Ban Bori article where your remove all history ebooks from the Google Scanning project with a single hit of a button Never heard of a rule saying that Google Scanning project is bogus and banned from Wikipedia That s malicious editing plain and simple Please stop edit war Or to use your Catholic vocabulary please stop the crusade