MY POST ISN T ORIGINAL RESEARCH IT S SIMPLE FACT What is so difficult for you to understand it s FACT that s the way lagalese works position statements are part of legalese You re saying you d skip over the statement water is wet as original research Quite frankly your assertion that it is original research is LUDACRIS I don t know whether or not your intentionally mischaracterizing things or whether you re truely this ignorant There is a HUGE point in having this discussion it s a refutation of avraham s assertion that the 1975 policy statement is irrelevant but it s apparently a refutation that you don t have the knowledge of legalese to understand which isn t my fault I m not going to explain to you a third time the legalese equivalent of water is wet The simple FACT is you re wrong it s not my problem that you don t have a good enough education to understand why despite my explaining it to you