FYI In case you didn t see this SkagitRiverQueen making unfounded accusations I have had to deal with this person continually since before Christmas Someone posted questionable content to her talk page whereupon she intitiated an unfounded sock case against me at Wikipedia Sockpuppet investigations Wildhartlivie Archive Then she filed a report here about me Next she popped up at Black Dahlia an article upon which she had never previously edited to revert something I removed and has maintained a overly long ridiculously drawn out discussion with editors there At one point Crohnie admonished her for treating her like an idiot or something Next she popped up at Charles Manson also an article upon which she had not previously edited to throw herself into an issue I was involved in and making unsupported statements which she has proceeded to edit war over She then joined WP CRIME a project in which I m active It is quote obvious she is stalking my edits Finally tonight another editor came to Talk Black Dahlia to enter a content vote and SkagitRiverQueen made an outright accusation against me of canvassing votes where she clearly and unequivocably said It s obvious that some editors have been canvassed specifically to sway the vote and am I making an accusation here yes indeed I am I asked her to withdraw her comment and her response was And frankly regardless of whether or not I can prove it I don t believe that you haven t canvassed for input here She was clearly challenged on this by LaVidaLoca here and Pinkadelica here I want this editor to stop following me around picking tenditious arguments and making specious and unfounded accusations against me Wildhartlivie talk I endorse these comments by Wildhartlivie I object to the specious claim that my opinion was canvassed in anyway and believe SkagitRiverQueen s intent is tenditious and assaultive in nature For the record she has reverted the Manson article 3 times even after she was asked not to edit war over it It appears to me that she is wikihounding Wildhartlivie and would take exception to anything she says or does This is an untenable situation that needs to stop LaVidaLoca talk As the editor who instigated the preliminary consensus vote and as such a possible cohort in the WP CANVASS I must agree that this claim against Wildhartlivie is specious and unwarranted I have attempted to instruct SkagitRiverQueen on the proper way to engage in disputes mainly not attacking other editors based on perceived editing style This has not worked as of yet I do see a pattern of wikihounding here on SkagitRiverQueen s part as do many other editors and this has persisted for some time This feud must end Doc9871 talk IMO this is purely retaliation by Wildhartlivie for the sock puppet investigation exactly why it s the first thing she mentioned in the complaint even though the issue has been over and done for nearly a couple of weeks now Not only is she reverting practically everything I have edited recently she is now reverting entire sections of large articles I have edited 18 On top of that she continues to call me by an inflammatory name Skag I have noted on my User Page it is not an acceptible contraction of my user name she even mentioned earlier today that she has read that admonition on my user page 19 that is a known slang term for women who have less than savory reputations 20 Now in addition to everything else she has placed an edit war warning on my talk page after she filed this report 21 I am not in an edit war and am actually trying to reason with the editor of that article who has been reverting my recent edits 22 Wildhartlivie has publically called my mental and emotional health into question here in Wikipedia on more than one occasion Additionally she has a questionable history that includes abuse of her rollback privileges see User talk Wildhartlivie for the warning she recently received and User talk GTBacchus for her responses to the warning continued incivility to anyone who edits articles she watches and canvassing her Wikipedia friends to back her up whenever her edits or actions are called into question above content from LaVidaLoca is proof of this And yes I do believe she canvassed editors by email regarding the issue we have been discussing at Talk Black Dahlia Concerning this complaint you will likely also hear from User Doc9871 User Pinkadelica User Crohnie User Rossrs User Vidor and User Equazcion all editors she has canvassed in the past when she feels she needs support in one of her efforts to prove me wrong Evidence of this can be found at 23 24 25 26 27 In those instances she out and out lied that I mentioned four of those editors in any fashion yet her