Tags This is a good faith tag saying that this article needs some work It s my opinion that the article is lacking the facts to support it adequately as an encyclopedic entry Looking at the archives I can see that many others agree wit me and have been frustrated by the NPOV and removal of descriptive content If I think it s in need of work why would your opinion or the opinions of your similarly biased cohorts count above mine Why not include a tag to an article that is obviously disputed and has been for years What s the point of keeping the tag out Why the rampant censorship No Mastcell YOU need to stop I don t believe I need a consensus to put this tag back The page s history is proof in and of itself Any page that doesn t let new NEUTRAL edits stay up for more than 30 minutes is a major PROBLEM as far as Wikipedia is concerned and is ABUSE of its intended use The tag GOES BACK It is a FACT that this page is hotly disputed and your opinion that others should not know about this fact is IRRELEVANT