I disagree with your general thesis The article on a certain person should not necessarily focus on his or her perspective and should definitely try to be neutral The article on Gengis Khan is not mostly written from Gengis Khan s perspective Even if I did agree with your thesis you would still be wrong since criticism of Freeman s critique does not constitute Mead s point of view She was dead by the time Criticism of Freeman s critique can at most be considered the perspective of her followers It is violates neutrality to blatantly overrepresent her followers perspective Sensemaker