Poorly Written The article is a good description of what is known about Merkle s Boner Unfortunately the discussion seems a bit rushed even for an encyclopedia entry and the grammar is a bit lacking I suggest that someone edit the page to make it intelligent Re Sensitivity It is not our problem that current society thinks of a boner as something other than a huge mistake That is what it was called back then and how it is known Re Scoring I agree big picture but I also object to using a word like drilled when a word like hit would suffice and be better understood The entry is factually correct as the facts disputed are known Our point is that the entry is poorly written I agree