Pasted here is the section I removed The research is commendable but would be more applicable in a section on modern criticms of slavery Even then it appears to be original research because the sources cited are not arguing against slavery on the basis of textual criticism they are arguing against authenticity of these books of the Bible Essentially this sentence is an original argument that the New Testament doesn t support slavery because certain Pauline epistles are not genuine apostolic writings It would be better to cite this argument from a source who has actually argued Christianity doesn t support slavery because the slavery tolerant passages in the NT are not authentic 69 19 14 35 However most scholars believe that these particular Pauline epistles were not actually authored by Paul page 385Udo Schnelle Apostle Paul His Life and Theology 2003 english translation published 2005 Hermann Detering The Falsified Paul 1995 Stephen G Wilson Luke and the Pastoral Epistles 1979 Norman Perrin The New Testament An Introduction 1974 W Bujard Stilanalytische Untersuchungen zum Kolosserfrief als Beitrag zur Methodik von Sprachvergleichen 1973 E J Goodspeed Key to Ephesians 1956 page 6Mitton The Epistle to the Ephesians 1951 pages 245 255Alfred Loisy The Origins of the New Testament 1936 Percy Neale Harrison The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles 1921 Ferdinand Christian Baur Paul the Apostle of Jesus Christ His Life and Works 1845 also partially advocated by Desiderius Erasmus