And thank you for trying to show me the light But I did AGF in thinking that the omission of 1 word was an innocent mistake I repeatedly mentioned that I do not understand what was so wrong about my edit And there was an edit conflict at the moment I was blocked where my comment asking that instead of the change that I was trying to edit that I did not have a problem with working towards some OTHER text being used with the graph In my reply above and after thinking about it some more I am re visiting my original feelings about the inclusion of the graph in any articles for several reasons So from here on out I am committed to doing away with the picture entirely Since you have been so helpful have you got any ideas about where my complaint would have a fair discussion Last time that I checked DRN was not overburdened but I would take my revised complaint to the article s TP first I guess taking your advice to AGF Personally I try to stay far away from ridiculous arguments and contentious editors because I feel like it is a waste of everyone s time but the global warming topic s representation on WP is showing the results of the battles that have gone on trying to defend the integrity of the articles and imo although I am trying to AGF there are enough protections in place to allow a little bold editing without being overly protective of every little thing 2601 C 6783 8416 BD19 9DFE 2A64 FBE3