Support for unblock request See Shell s response to this block made directly to Gnan garra via Diffs Users like me are not permitted to edit archives of project pages like AN I The request asked me to do something that it would have been a violation of Wikipedia editing policy guidelines for me to do Please follow the previous and next edits in the above link to Diffs just provided The block even the reason given for it just illustrates in my view additional piling on of already unwarranted accusations Shell points out the unfair nature of this block see Diffs linked above move through to previous and next all of the material has been deleted from Gnan garra s current talk page Why is the administrator not following the same requirements re archiving of current discussions that s he thinks was required of me by User John Carter though JC says it was not There was no condition or requirement in the closing administrator JC s closing summary conclusion I voluntarily added the archiving bot which is or was malfunctioning apparently as I have alerted both Shell and Gnan garra My reasonable and logical presentation of my own perspective on the AN I was posted before not after the request by Gnan garrait had in it and was edited out in the past day but I put it back in so Shell and Gnan garra could refer to it more easily Labeling my comments as a rant or a screed is likewise still unwarranted and even in my view a violation of Wikipedia Etiquette as I have said in the Sept 5 now archived AN I Shell has already indicated that this block should be removed unblocked and why she thinks so My list of comments above was posted prior to Gnan Garra s archive 25 post which is misplaced and which I myself restored in request above see the date time stamps I did not make and do not make any personal attacks PA against anyone and I have not reiterated any such PA the word inhumane is not my word that is Gnan garra s word paraphrase after quoting me from a now archived AN I also out of context Again please provide diffs Paraphrasing and using words like inhumane which I myself did not use does not substantiate any claim of my engaging in any such PA personal attack I did not engage in any such thing I did not accuse anyone of anything and certainly did not use uncivil or offensive language though others did so in that AN I see the editing summary which contains improper expletive language by another user I said that a user repeatedly seems to lack humane compassion and linked to earlier version of my current N B scroll up I observed that earlier in the July 2008 AN I and still feel that way I am being attacked while I have not attacked anyone the policy is WP NPA There was no claim of personal attacks leveled at me in what Orderinchaos filed on September 5 2008 all his her claims have been proved to be incorrect and false I have engaged in no blockable behavior from July 15 until now and I still question the block initiated in July nevertheless I accepted the terms of that block and immediately accepted an offer of adoption I was not the one who canceled the adoption by Ecoleetage The adopter Ecoleetage canceled it on his own after seeing what he says he considered no reason to continue it I thought he had or would have contacted User John Carter to inform him of that but apparently he did not That was Ecoleetage s action not mine There was no collusion with Ecoleetage on either my part or his part as Orderinchaos mistakenly claims there was in the Sept 5 AN I statements at top of it See I wonder above Shell s response and my reply to that I have not stated that Orderinchaos engaged in anything but possibly inadvertent misstatements nonetheless they are misstatements and false accusations which led to further misstatements about my alleged behavior from July 15 to September 5 2008 Any reply I made was later maligned as if it were a rant or a screed and not accorded the respect that it deserved and deserves as a good faith