Grant specifically says that no attempt to enforce the rule of nonrecognition as regards East Jerusalem seems to have been made at U N level No occasion for enforcement has been afforded in regard to the Golan Heights Also Grant is the only guy I could find who calls UN General Assembly resolutions regimes of non recognition and I believe that using this term is misleading and not neutral So not sourced reliably and not written in a neutral style I would also suggest that reverting after a specific BRD request even if only doing it once or twice per day is edit warring and disruptive I m sure ArbCom frowns on that sort of thing as well