If I may WP JAGUAR ya for a sec there are other reasons for not capitalizing procrustean see WP MODLANG search for platonic to find the entry Also it s fallacious and assumptive of neutral ignorant faith at best to suggest that those who prefer consistency over rampant specialist nit picking are generalist editors with little to no understanding of the world s thousands of specialty fields Many are specialists themselves who for the greater good simply put aside their job related stylistic conventions instead of insisting on them and smacking random readers in the face with them Talk Contribs A Barnstar Point A Barnstar Point Awarded for remarkably pithy commentary If a high profile Wikipedian poll is conducted that brings in widespread participation from editors who had previously stayed away from the venue and the holdouts who had been stonewalling and preventing progress merely slouch stuff their hands in their pockets and walk away then that proves that they knew full well that their arguments were not sufficiently persuasive or didn t have sufficient numbers or both Trying to now torpedo the current consensus by stating that certain people somehow didn t have an opportunity to participate is nothing but sour grapes On Wikipedia it s called wililawyering which is disruptive and mustn t be rewarded Wikipedia talk Article titles thread Why no action on implementing community consensus which made my list of Talk Contribs