That is all very nice and good cyclic logic but I would like a second opinion Otherwise as I have said without acutally putting the offence in front of me it can be interpreted as weasel words and intimidation tactics Also if I have bothered you so much then for the reason of conflict of interest as well I deserve a second opinion and not from one of your admin clique buddies either Also you seem to know what violation I have commited with Talk Nontrinitarianism References instead of waving the whole manual of Wikipedia in front of me I m asking you to show it to me