Actually the whole fact that it s an encyclopedia on the internet that anyone can edit therefore has questionable reliability gives Wikipedia a bad name But enough When I said boring I was using it as a derogatory term in general Although he is boring I was attacking him because I don t buy his theories because I think he presents them in an unintelligent light I didn t take it very seriously because I don t think it was written seriously although he was thorough I ll give him that And the first person who posted here please sign your name not to mention read all the stuff I ve written in the homosexuality section Anyway I think the treasure trove part unless it is proven to be false works fine because that is the current theory Any objections