Now we are getting somewhere although I expect evidence in your next post Firstly the assertion was if they where undercopyright in the first place You say that its derisable so by all means prove it Moreover fair use is not simply a license to copy any amount of stuff sometimes without attribution and hoping that that s ok I found that part laughable as British law says it is fair use do do exactly that go look for yourself if you don t believe be but I know you won t as your scared that I ll be proved right Oh and the claim about no attribution is a blatent lie all of the articles are given citations If I m wrong about the above then by all means correct me with proof Your acting as if your say so is evidence enough not going to cut any more mustard with me