That s even worse Pre emptively claiming that no consensus exists while in the middle of an RfC is just outright disruptive and unhelpful Basically that equates to him saying there s no consensus on this and you re idiots for trying to come to one so let s leave the article title as it which co incidentally happens to be that author s preferred choice from previous debates Surely you can see how transparently unscrupulous that appears 85 211 130 47