You keep repeating this I keep explaining it and you keep ignoring the explanation and repeating the same complaint Ehrman is not a reliable source on what all scholars believe He is a borderline source on what historians believe since he is not a historian He is a religion professor As editors it should seem questionable that it is a fact all scholars agree on something when that something isn t supported by a single peer reviewed secular journal None of those concerns require sources There are other things that matter to an encyclopedia