To all editors please note that the concerns brought up by 58 96 94 12 were addressed in my last edit of the article I added the Criticisms section which details the only peer review paper published in a physics journal critical of Prof Tipler s Omega Point Theory while also giving a number of non refereed book review articles which have been critical of the Omega Point Theory Keep in mind that Tipler s Omega Point Theory has been peer reviewed and published in a number of the world s leading physics journals and so the Category Pseudoscience tag is factually incorrect and violates Wikipedia s policies of WP Truth WP NPOV and WP Reliable Sources Yet still 58 96 94 12 complains even though he as yet has not stated what is wrong with the current edit It appears that 58 96 94 12 simply wants some notice or tag on this article telling people that it is bilge and that they oughtn t sake it seriously I m more than happy to work with 58 96 94 12 but he appears to be unwilling to be satisfied until he gets some edit which violates Wikipedia policy