259694712 oldid 259689030 And what I added doesn t fit a symbolism section Above I was complaining about removal of mostly symbolic parts well actually what I missed was first the mention of those fact and only afterwards possible interpretations Looking at the guideline and its provided example I do think that the significance of the facts should be described in between the plot I m not sure if that s what the manual of style actually says You at the very least need to cite the possible reference part gial For instance I do not appreciate most of the edits of this combined diff from the same author of the one I discuss above