2009 UTC A classic example of the willful ignorance of WP s Jihadist fundamentalist editors There is absolutely no effort to take on the substantive points of argument Instead argument is sought to be suffocated by a turn to a trivial point of rhetoric The above editor places all her his anonymous hopes of an argument on just who Child stated in passing was repeated by Alcock without recognizing the petty basis of this claim Let the editor and her sympathizers search out this pettiness for themselves as the editor should have obliged herself to do before she so grandiloquently laid out her self humiliating argument Rodgarton 12 12 6 October