I disagree Including ambiguous names is not helpful especially where there are unambiguous names that have already been introduced to the reader The fact that fishermen use other names doesn t mean that we have to in this context It doesn t make sense to switch from justifiably calling it Crangon crangon in one section to brown shrimp in another It significantly reduces the coherence of the whole article I haven t removed or altered any of the statements you have added merely reformatted them to fit the context Feel free to change the section heading but don t introduce vague terminology where it isn t needed