I understand what you re saying but this is not a disciplinary measure it is further offence as an admin not only attacks my WQA response but then conceals their attack by turning my behaviour into hyperbole to reduce their guilty I don t apologise to people with such motives or who serve protect themselves The project only risks degenerating when sysop is left in the hands of people who abuse it I maintain that the block is a front a pretext If reviewing admins are failing to take time to determine that and recognise the integrity of my claim instead of taking Fram s for granted which is contrary to we re all equals on wiki then I will have no choice but to raise the matter elsewhere such as RfC or ArbCom This isn t about discipline at my age I don t consider you can t login as anything like you suggest because it s not like losing wages It s the principle of the matter My contribs to WQA were meticulously used as spin against me instead of the AGF everyone else saw them as I don t intend to let Fram sit on a high horse any longer Either they apologise first and withdraw their false assertions or they ll have to explain them to RfC or ArbCom Which I m sure is much more complex and time consuming and stressful than admitting to any wrong doing but so be it I stand for what I believe in and always have I won t be bullied by someone like that So really the ball is in their court If no one is counting coup that applies to the admin who attacked me in an undignified manner and continues to do so by maintaining their position though now shielding themselves behind a wall of admins instead of facing up to the fact they erred COI is clearly affecting their actions or unwillingness to show face They can either opt in and admit they were wrong for their attack or wait until a higher channel one that even exceeds their stance asks why they attacked my contribs and synthesised a despicable bad faith conclusion The consequences this dispute have yet to be determined Chat RFF