12 November 2007 UTC I am quite baffled I was merely making comments based on the general manual of style used in wikipedia which your article examples for Lincoln demonstrates I have spent a great deal of time on wikipedia working on different topics and this is merely the general way of doing things One can write an entire book simply on Atat rk s involvement on a single skirmish let alone war it has a great amount of potential for growth than Atat rk s personal life Bio articles aim to cover a persons general life while sub articles cover specific events or time frames in greater detail like George Washington George Washington s early life 1732 1754 George Washington in the French and Indian War 1754 1758 George Washington between the wars 1758 1775 George Washington in the American Revolution 1775 1783 Presidency of George Washington 1783 1797 Post presidency George Washington Retirement and death 1797 1799 Mind you that this is in the chronological order of the sections Content of the articles do not overlap each other The sub article you want to create for Atat rk covers his entire life I do not see what is there to compromise from all that You are welcome to explain why you want a mirror bio article for Atat rk s entire life and I can reconsider my position chi 14 08