I ll confess to being a bit lost among these theological discussions I can say that we should include all significant points of view even Geaves If some say that Rawat had a Sant Mat lineage while other say he had an Advait Mat or Radhasoami lineage then all of those views should be included in proportion to their prominence and we shouldn t take sides either directly or by implication Note that each of those linked topics has an article of its own so we don t need to discuss them at length in this article Anything we do say about them should be relevant to Rawat himself More broadly I d remind everyone that we have an entire article devoted to Rawat s teachings Teachings of Prem Rawat The material in this article should simply be a summary of that article Since the introductory section of that article should also summarize that article in an ideal world we could simply copy to the intro here as a summary Unfortunately this is not an ideal world That article has needed work for years but there hasn t been any significant editing there in the past year May I suggest moving this discussion to that talk page talk