You have not demonstrated the unreliability of In fact you are expressing a personal view that it is not reliable It provides sources and documents you will find nowhere else That is why it should be included as a reference Besides you mention the organization in the article and do not provide any reference to it So I suggest you either delete the unsupported reference to the GPPC and NWPL or add a refererence to You are suppressing reliable and verifiable information in support of a Wikipedia article This should be denounced as a violation of the letter and spirit of encylopedic knowledge l