There is no policy basis for the block Your idea that engaging in a discussion in an article talk page with only two comments no less in a way that involves policy constitutes a policy discussion is just preposterous Posting the murderer s name on the talk page does not constitute disruption yes making a point but no not disrupting Wikipedia and in any case they ve promised not to continue And given that you have been involved in the discussion and taken a clear stance against this user s opinions as established by you here it might be best for you to let it be I honestly see at most 2 who really support the block you and Jayron and you d been involved in the dispute Arguably Exploding Boy might have but his one comment has been contradicted Roux Hersfold and Baseball Bugs never said anything about the block and Roux is highly involved anyway Enigma supported a checkuser but gave no reasoning at all Plus we ve gotten concessions from the user juicetalk