As this article is essentially a reconstruction of his resume WP RESUME would appear relevant Per WP NOR Primary secondary and tertiary sources articles are meant to be based on reliable published secondary sources in order to provide interpretive claims analyses or synthetic claims about the topic Lack of any such interpretive claims analyses or synthetic claims is why I described the article as a bland and bloodless resume not WP IDONTLIKEIT as you claimed in violation of WP AGF If the only thing distinguishing him from my any random Biblical scholar is the adjective distinguished then we can simply make this article a soft redirect with the following text Distinguished Biblical scholar I answered your question citing relevant material from the guideline you based your question on All that stands is your WP IDIDNOTHEARTHAT TalkStalk P TalkStalk P