If we had an award for Facepalm of the Year I would give it to this edit summary which I have reverted It now appears that if there is not enough information on the page about what the protesters have said some editors complain that we are trying to make the protesters look bad And if someone adds what the protesters have said directly quoted and reliably sourced some editors complain that we are trying to make the protesters look bad I want to make something very very clear the reason that sentence was added to the page was to present more content about the March itself reflecting reliably sourced material about the March itself in order that the page not be slanted towards criticism of the marchers or of their beliefs The idea that it was motivated by a desire to make the marchers look loony is entirely a figment of the reverting editor s imagination If anyone believes that the marcher who said that sounded wrong in any way please take it up with that marcher not here Wow