February 2008 UTC Still discussing WP RS is a guideline and WP IAR allows us to use it if RS interferes with improving wikipedia If Lanning is good demonstration of the mainstream opinion on SRA then it s completely suitable Currently there is a feeling that the credibility given to the concept is giving undue weight to the existence of a highly improbable condition The journal of psychohistory is not peer reviewed Lloyd DeMause alone edits it See Journal of Psychohistory and Psychohistory Criticism as well it s not a universally accepted discipline DeMause uses a Freudian dodge to respond to criticism it s resistance not a valid criticism As stated above it s use by many many reliable sources gives it a lot of credibility Religioustolerance org is not the source for the report it is a convenience link making objections to RT org a red herring 18 57 8