Sanitizing controversies section not acceptable Ferengi or Salegi or wikimanone or whatever you re called now you had no business reverting most of the controversies section to begin with speak If you want to clean up a biased article go work on Crisis pregnancy center speak I refer you Kentipo to WP CIVIL WP UNDUE and note that you have had past wars of this type including a 3RR Look if something is as controversial as this then it is always better to seek consensus before publishing in the article because otherwise someone may really overstep the mark and land WP in trouble I am aware that much of what is going back and forth is verifiable but the tone is extremely POV and it is a worrying trend It needs more civil discussion less name calling and moe WP AGF on all sides I agree I would like to clean up the Crisis pregnancy center article as well it is extremely WP POV in lending CPCs any credibility at all I agree with Sitush we need to build consensus before unilaterally adding content that is extremely POV which I removed The stings may merit mention but if so they need to be properly written to avoid POV so lets use WP CIVIL and discuss how to improve this article reasonably and assuming WP GOOD FAITH in the discussion above WikiOne I have no issue with mentioning the stings perhaps in a sentence or two for ALL of them and not several paragraphs for the various stunts they have pulled to illustrate that there have been some flash in the pan fusses that did not uncover any actual crimes at lease based on reliable sources We just don t need to have all of this detail especially since the sources meaning the fringe groups are selective in what they share to support their agendas