I renamed the article from war on Iraq to invasion of Iraq for two reasons The article is completely about the decision to invade or not I saw nothing about reactions to the progress of the war itself or the occupation afterwards let alone the current Iraqi government s campaign against the insurgents The phrase war on promotes the POV that the purpose or effect of the war was against the legitimate interests of the Iraqi people a position which is not a fact but a point of view still hotly disputed Invasion of carries no such connotation It s strictly neutral raising no questions of purpose or legitimacy 19 10 13 Aug 2004 UTC