I am really writing this post to counter the claims that Marxism has direct responsibility for human rights violations or the regimes it has inspired although admittedly at the end of the day Marxism may hold some indirect reponsibility I think the first person who posted may have a point however to Telaviv one although i agree with you that nearly every communist regime has become a tyranny or mobocracy you also have to realise that nearly every communist regime has not been at all orthodox Marxist In orthodx marxism which I do nt support Russia in 1917 would not have been fit to enter communism because it was mainly inhabited by a majority of agriculturalists it was backwards and most of its populace was uneducated or illeterate China qualified even less as it was totally backwards and Mao basically disregarded orthodox Marxism not to even mention cambodia or vietnam I do nt think was perfect and I am no communist but I think ideas can be learnt from every notweworthy philosophy even Marx You also have to realise Marx s motive for supporting communism was moral ideological whereas perhaps with the majority of revolutionary communists the reasons were nationalistic or materialistic and therefore more associated with the right What I am saying is that if Marx dictated that communist states should function as they have and do today yes maybe human rights violations would deserve a mention but his ideology is not to blame it is the people who follow his ideology who often commit the crimes 86 150 147 133 User R G P A