Well on one hand it s ok for Duckworth to call Peter a liar and its not ok for Mr Roskam response not to see the light of day on Wikipedia It would seem to be a matter of fair play and common sense and with precedent being set on the Ms Tammy Duckworth Wikipedia Article The Duckworth article which you two lovingly protect from absolutly any negative insertions and damaging Cruft so I invoke this little bit of policy WP SENSE BTW it s funny there is no such listing of Duckworth s more notable campaign contributors like BABS and Baldwin It was Baldwin who wanted to hurt Mr Hyde during the Clinton enpeachment trials There were a LOT of people here in the 6th that didn t cotton to well to Mr Baldwin and would not cotton to Tammy s outsider friends very well if such information became more public knowlege of the contributions made by Mr Baldwin and his east and west coast limo librals which are the lions share of Duckworth contributions and are TOTAL OUTSIDERS to the 6th as well as Duckworth too It is this as well as the general tone of Duckworth article which reads like a STORY or Campaign Tract and in light of this as well as being armed with precedents that you two good faith editors have set I will lovingly protect Roskams article in the same Loving way as you two protect the Duckworth article and as per this policy WP SENSE or in other words What s fair is fair what s good for the Duckworth article is good for the Roskam article Common sense rulez Do zobaczenia