I am sorry to have hurt your religious beliefs Seriously are you asking me to find sources when you have none Are you aware that Wikipedia is not a democracy Refer to WP POLL I do not see the consensus I agree with the oldest surviving monotheistic religion part but I completely disagree with the claim of Judaism being the oldest surviving religion for two reasons 1 There is no scholarly source making this claim apart from some anonymous Jewish child who has uploaded some pdf file on a website that has zero credibility Are you serious I still am shocked to see that you guys are defending an anonymous kid s high school homework paper as a legitimate source of knowledge to be honorably quoted on the Wikipedia 2 Credible sources like Encyclopaedia Britannica are saying that another religion is the oldest surviving religion On the Wikipedia article on Hinduism the exact same claim is made but with reliable sources See WP SOURCES Among its direct roots is the historical Vedic religion of Iron Age India and as such Hinduism is often called the oldest living religion D S Sarma Kenneth W Morgan The Religion of the Hindus 1953 or the oldest living major religion in the world in the world So my question is which page on the Wikipedia is to be trusted in this regard The one with reliable scholarly sources or the one with anonymous self published pdf files I still do not understand why the name of the authors are not given and they are considered scholarly sources Where were these cited works published Where are the references in the works These essays are saying God made a pact with Abraham and so forth How can this be even taken seriously if the article is assuming that all the God pact story is actual historical fact Any way that s the besides the main point The real issues here are reliable sources self published sources verifiability and original research by anonymous teenage prodigal scholars Now let us examine the scholar noel12 from Texas who wrote this high school homework paper On the cited source the said scholar claims to be 15 at the time of writing this scholarly article Do we still need to talk about WP V in this regard The other cited source a music website run by Jewish people does not even have a title or name of the author or date of publication or anything except the bold claim that Judaism is the oldest religion Please do not take this personally or anything I really wish to stress this twice I just like to see Wikipedia as a reliable encyclopedia Is it more about reflecting personal sentiments or providing credible knowledge cited with scholarly sources In summary I say that the uncited claim of Judaism being the oldest surviving religion be removed while keeping the oldest monotheistic religion part and keep Wikipedia a serious unbiased encyclopedia Hope I have appealed to your better judgement 70 64 86 187