Lack of neutrality There is a disproportional amount of negative and damaging material in this entry It seems like Wikipedia is being used to further some vicious fanatic s revenge Generally an encyclopedia entry should report the honors and praise which have earned the subject his fame If there is controversy that should be mentioned but criticisms should not be given equal time he s not important by virtue of his mistakes after all See these comments please 2001 5B0 23FF 2CF0 0 0 0 2F