User MarnetteD yes I tried No they wouldn t listen They took it to Wikipedia talk Categories for discussion Question regarding categories and made a dozen or so reverts without any consensus having been reached which was down right cheeky and tendentious Take a look at their block log they have a habit or WP 3RR reverting when they can t get their own way Ignoring consensus is one thing inventing it to create a revertable POV is bad faith no matter what the edit involves Editor made a controversy where not exists in this category Creating drama for the sake of POV doesn t make ends meets 82 8 252 13