My numerous beefs with the template Poor coding Clear right is preferable to unnecessary line breaks a single text align center is preferable to repeating needlessly align center for every cell A width definition is preferable to margins and more commona cross wikipedia there is absolutely no need to have the comment be inserted in every page as it is specifically intended only for the template page There is no apparent reason to have a category in the template the category would be just as well put independantly The link in the header was misleading as implying an article limited to western Russia Unless Kremlin actually is but I doubt that and can t really tell anyway No background color in the header unlike 90 of wikipedia footers Picture enlarging header unnecesssarily at the very least it should be reduced and move in the content section of the footer 80 is unnecearily small for a simple footer like this Most wikipedia footers do very well with 90 Now I d like to know why you reverted the entire thing including a totally legit categorization uunder category Russian navigational boxes instead of just adjusting what you weren t happy with which appears to me to be only the comment s location and the image