Au contraire this is absolutely a question of opinion namely yours and mine It s interesting that as a highly experienced Wikipedia user who seems to relish his ability to quickly attack a newbie whose edites he does not agree with through the use of the various nuances in Wikipedia including your accusing me of vandalizing being a sock puppet and whatever ever else you could use to demean and harm my editing efforts from the very first edits I tried to make including continuously deleting my edits and then when I innocently put them back in each time you deleted them labeling me as violating some rule about not replenishing a page more than 3 times in 24 hours or something like that that after all this you still aren t satisfied You falsely accuse me of some nevarious connection to a website I linked out to which is clearly not a commercial site Just because you tell a big lie even over and over does not make it true That trick only works for Republicans As I said we ll have to agree to disagree and let others come to their own conclusions I don t want to argue with you about your behavior anymore It s not what Wikipedia is for Let s discuss the merits of the information contained on the page we re here to talk about Or if you aren t an expert on this subject and can not make a meaningful contribution in that regard then maybe you can move on to another subject where you have some expertise and let those of us who are more familiar with the subject discuss it unhindered with your technical maneuverings What say you Can we lay down the hatchet and move past this