Please feel very welcome to break down the appearing analysis of sources as you suggest into particular categories to make editor action easier at the Human sexuality page If a series of Talk sections were created Dead URLs URL only citations King editions missing page numbers Other books missing page numbers Incomplete citations Poor quality sources etc perhaps appearing from simple fixes to more complicated you are very likely correct we might see more rapid attention to solving particular problems Because I have done so much already I will have to leave this to you or another editor Perhaps if you do a first round I can check it and then we can see who comes to the aid of that sinking ship for an article without verifiable sources is just that and the more problems the more holes that it has sprung Cheers Le Prof