I can t believe you would use the argument about it being truer to the original color with regard to the background but not mention that awful black stuff around the edges as if that s somehow truer to the original I m also curious as to what method you used to compare the sharpness since I merely compared them side by side and saw that in crispness they re identical Again yours is larger but that s because I deliberately used a smaller image because the Fair Use Rationale requires that such images be no larger than IIRC 300px Yours is labeled 300px in the Fair Use Rational Template ts image page but that label is incorrect because right below the image it says that it s 400 x 600 something We re lucky some other editor or bot hasn t come and tagged it as inappropriate because of that That s why I used a 300px image so I wonder if that s what you re basing this on Anyway I photoshopped your version to remove the blackness at the edges and the green smudginess from the lower half of the image to make it more gold I also credited you on th e page to which I uploaded this newest version I hope that s a good compromise Thing is since it s a modification of your image it s still more than 300px so let s hope we don t get tagged for it If we do we ll have to put an Image Reduction Request tag on it