Unbalanced This article appears very biased It reads as if the goal was to present this man as a complete quack and with that goal in mind only sources which supported that viewpoint were sought out More concerning are the instances of improperly referenced content Only had time to look at refs from opening paragraph but already found multiple examples of content not supported by the refs attached to it It was claimed Mercola is an alternative medicince proponent but reference only briefly mentions that Mercola was involved in a lawsuit with someone who apparently happens to be a critic of alternative medicine This doesn t exactly make Mercola an alternative medicine proponent The alternative medicine WP says alternative medicine is not based on evidence or scientific method Mercola is an Osteopathic Physician which is research field requiring training similar to that of MD s In the first paragraph it was also claimed he was a member of several alternative medicine organizations with no reference supporting this claim