Added You arenwo on my Yahoo list Lets be civil As of December 26th Not interested I don t have yahoo and have no inclination to discuss Acharya s wiki page with you privately But yo will s mear me publiclaly You will ioe distort and harrass DOnt you think it woudl be best to end this nonsence You foudn out I administered a Christain forum and tried ot use that agaisnt me EVen thouhg it contians nohtign of this debaucle You even tried ot make me out tobe a Creaitonist You arnet intereste dint he truth and ar ea Hypocrite You say I smmear Acharya and you defend the truth You use the sametactics you acucse me of and the whole CHristain rleigion of You lie to defend your hero as she advocates beelifs you wish to promote THus it wudl be better to olve this as Genglemen and not as the coarldy attacksyou have made Zarove Teh Point Zarove I don t have yahoo and I see no reason why you feel the need to discuss this with me privately Everything you ve brought up below can be discussed on the talk page As I ve said I may drop by the Christian Forum once this is resolved SHorter vewrsion 1 After this si resolved what s the point No one theireven knows of this fiasco 2 You used my administration their ito show I m biased I am a Zealoted Christain This was a shameful tactic Its absicllay Guilt by association It sbad enough I m labled one of Holdigns followers Yopu even tried ot prove I was a fidny by linkign me with creationism At the same tiem you decree any attmeot to examine Dorothy as Smearing her I did nt msmear her to dicredit her But you smear me to discredit me Nothign in my own past reveals any bias and I m toelrnt of all views but nto all condict 3 As you refuse to bother to listen to reason I want ot see if I can one on one discuss the matte with you No other reason I edited my own apst message to make it more tot he point to what I itnended The last one thogh not written so cna be seen as Harsh I will add yo this weekend Please allow contact Ithinky uo will fin ditfruitful Re I did nt msmear her to dicredit her If not to discredit her then why Now As I said Letsbe civil and discuss thematter in a live chat I think you will fidn that mroe ocndusive Given your current artilc eis a whitewashofher I do think a better option for you before yourbanned as a troll is to tlak to me Ill be waiitng Unless you alloew me to add you Sorry not interested I don t see what the point would be No rellay working The difficulty onthe talk page is yor blatant willignness to decieve others abotu me usign the same tactic you claim I use againt Acharya You claim that I am a covert Zelous Christain wantign to defame her and you merley wish to defend the truth We both know this is nt true James You want peopel to beelive her ideas and are willignto do anyhtign to make her seem as imprsive as possibl an rmeove all oposiiton to her vies My Chrisytaintiy is sued asa blundgeoon You make it osund as if I oppose Acharya base don my faiht hate her and vehemntly opose her and htus want ot attakc her You then claim the aritlce is written in sch a way that it attakcs her No spacific exampels of attakc are shown gowever I can assure you nothign ithe article that is the current ocncensus among the general posters As oppsoed ot the Acharyans is derogatory towards her But yo wish to rmeove the links ot CHrisyain rebuttals and all critisms If Dorothy wants to attack Chrisgaunity why has she then no supply of courage to stand up to their rebuttals Midn you I m not th eon makign suh a rebuttal THis is WIkipedia and I am ever midnful fo the need tobe Unbiased Thoughyou will nto accept hat form me This is why I think talkigto me on Yahoo woudl be mor eocnductive Uou would not only getot know me but also ge tot have liv interaction this wya we can easily discuss in real time any and very issue The baords you wher invited ot to demonstrae you rown abyslam lack of undertanidng baout both Christendom and myself My invovlement on that baord shos how open midned I can be a s itsamonght emost inclusive baords you can go THe invitaitonstands alays butthe raon I want you their now is to demonstrate how little bias their is I have fairly rt