Unthinking automated corrections Your edit summary at the article Grotrian Steinweg characterised the bulk of my edits as unthinking automated corrections and you reverted them In general I find the principles of Wikipedia Revert only when necessary worthy of consideration In particular I assure you they were not automated and are the result of some thinking In detail the correct syntax for a reference invocation by name is as for any unary HTML tag to close it with a space preceding the slash the wikilink for Germany in the infobox is a case of WP OVERLINK when using the parameter is unnecessary the term Initial Interest Confusion is capitalised at its article and I presume with good reason the template is useful even for articles which currently already show all of that caterory s images as more files might be placed into that category in the future I suggest you revert your edit additionally please consider WP Revert only when necessary