The Japanese language may not be esoteric but this article certainly is obscure It s based on an English languange phenomenon and so one would not expect many first language Japanese editors to have interest In any case unsourced challenged material does NOT get the benefit of the doubt It s up to you to prove that it is worthy of staying Where are all those fluent Japanese editors defending this translation So far everyone has been quick to defend the idea of the material but no one has come by and defended the actual content