You appear to have read negative connotations into a simple term which I did not intend to read as such If you have understood it to be negative I apologise and will change the wording on the other talk page It is unnecessary to take a defensive position with me on this split as I have already stated that nothing outside of central European architecture has been developed there sic What I have stated is what I mean the content is essentially about Central Europe Nevertheless I consider it a matter of courtesy to give fair warning to anyone still involved in the original page as I believe that is what is meant by consensus decisions I made absolutely no reference to POV problems For myself I m entirely neutral on the matter of this split If anything I m not even certain as to why it was developed as Eastern European specific in the first instance