The potential for expansion does not justify keeping something that is so short and lacking in context Donald has already identified two separate articles that contain a lot of information about the 2000 controversy and United States presidential election 1876 has a detailed analysis of the double returns from Florida which covered everything that was in this article until a few moments ago If you sufficiently expand the article I can support keeping it but it s sad that only a prod got anybody s attention on this article and it appeared that you had stopped after your burst of edits from Friday talk