Comment That s been my understanding as well In case after case editors argue and edit war over subjective terms such as mixed or universally acclaimed the later even when the universal is not 100 None of these subjective interpretations help the reader But if the reader sees that RT s aggregation says this and MC s aggregation says this and reads a sampling of critics quotes beneath that then a reader can make up his or her own mind And we even offer the CinemaScore audience view to give them an even more well rounded picture We don t need to open with a claim that s subject to debate We need to just give the facts