Omit The sourcing is weak and by one interpretation of widely the name has not been widely published by reliable sources so per wp DOB we may accede to the subject s wish But also the name seems to have been originally leaked as a breach of trust and the subject asserts that inclusion of the name distresses him Above someone said the feelings of the article s subject can t be taken into account because that would violate our need for a neutral point of view That s a falsehood What kind of bias would that introduce I can see none Too many editors here equate respecting the feelings of the subject with bias Humans take account of the feelings of others If we weren t meant to do that we could all be replaced by an algorithm Including this trivial fact here against the express wish of the subject is gratuitously cruel Wikipedia needs to take claims of distress from article subjects seriously and respect those feelings where the price of doing so as in this case is cheap