Quite a few of my edit were prior to Lancaster becoming involved in editing the page Also the first block of my edits were when I was tasked with merging it with Actus et potentia But it s Lancaster s rapid and escalating talk page demands that are much more of an issue than rapid edits to the article I ve had to spend an enormous amount of time responding to that talk page and to Talk Energeia one of the articles to be merged Would it make any difference if I could prove he s made false and misleading statements in his charges But if that s not the sort of thing you usually look into I don t want to impose Should I open a WP AN3 like he did I ve collected this list from Aug 20 where Lancaster has reversed actions of mine in whole or in part That s not all and that s just the 20th Lancaster s deletion of most of what I ve worked on in the article 18 46 20 August 2010 My changes to the definitions in the lead from 0143 20 August 2010 18 35 20 August 2010 My addition of modal logic to the lead from 0230 20 August 2010 18 35 20 August 2010 My changes to Actuality from 0110 20 August 2010 08 21 20 August 2010 My addition of an OR tag from 0058 20 August 2010 18 42 20 August 2010 Please let me know if more instances or additional information on each would be helpful Or anything that would help shed some light Thank you