Irredentist edits in Wikipedia pages I found several innovations and new WIKI rules applied by some users that violates the normal comportament of editors These estonishing edits were made by some editors who managed to block all oponents using gang tactics and misinformation of administrators See next page cur prev 17 40 18 November 2014 Borsoka talk contribs 110 912 bytes 995 Further reading books written before WWII cur prev 17 39 18 November 2014 Borsoka talk contribs 111 907 bytes 1 unreferred non English source the deleted source English version cur prev 17 36 18 November 2014 Borsoka talk contribs 111 906 bytes 158 Secondary sources unreferred source which was written before WWII cur prev 17 35 18 November 2014 Borsoka talk contribs 112 064 bytes 636 Theory of Daco Romanian continuity WP NPOV this section presents the scholars views not their argumentation cur prev 17 32 18 November 2014 Borsoka talk contribs 112 700 bytes 634 Theories on the Romanians ethnogenesis there is no need to add scholars POV of their opponents POV X does not accept Y s view and says that Y s view is exclusivelly based on Y s biased stupid approach cur prev 17 28 18 November 2014 Borsoka talk contribs 113 334 bytes 346 Theories on the Romanians ethnogenesis unrelevant information and the two specialist mentioned in connection with the immigrationist theory are not Hungarians and more non Hungarian scholar could be added All these edits show the real character of the editor named Borsoka He is considered as an irredentist editor by Romanians Ukrainian and Serb editors Amazing reasons to erase Romanian references and Romanian historians text 1 Book before WW 2 2 Non English reference 3 Scholar s view and not scholar s argumentation here original research of Borsoka 4 There is no need to add scholars POV of their opponents but in his Hungarian history pages there are a lot of such opinions 5 Stupid approach new original research of Borsoka about Romanian references 6 Specialists are not Hungarians Also the user Fakirbakir erased several Romanian references because he considered that he personally disagree the opinions of the Romanian author and if he disagrees an author here about Georgescu a historian he erases it from WIKI pages section Georgescu s statement I have to disagree with Georgescu s statement There is a simple explanation of these amazing innovations and new Wikipedia rules The two editors Borsoka and Fakirbakir act as a gang against editors from neighboring countries and act alternatively to avoid the 3RR rule and to eliminate single editors Their scope to emphasize the priority in history of Hungarians this is a part of the definition of IRREDENTISM to show the priority in history against neigbouring countries All these reasons made the mentioned history article to be of very bad quality due to irredentist edits Some Romanian journals wrote about these activities in the Wikipedia pages and so Wikipedia is considered as an unreliable source for history due to these amazing edits Unfortunately no administrator acted against these tactics I mentioned you the vandalism in the mentioned pages but no result