RS and older source You ve found one or two errors While one journal is indeed a reliable source e g peer reviewed I probably should have moved that citation when other content was deleted and I re added it elsewhere The other direct source being an unsigned article with no peer review known I ll drop it subject to confirmation of its citation to Gibbon ch 44 for which I plan to look Both journals were in JStor but that s not dispositive Rephrasing a however and nearby text would not have been a problem I did not intend to communicate supersession only that the sources disagreed