It all depends on what you call free energy and what you call suppression IMHO there are so many different free energy machines it s just hilarious Knowing that makes the reason for suppressing them down all to obvious If some one is getting stalked then you just take their word for it The main criticism of the theory is that these devices are absent in the market because they do not and can not work Here the excuse to ignore it is the ignorance it self The tool of suppression is the argument the devices don t exist but this is also the excuse for never looking at them at the same time We ca nt have it both ways Either the machines don t work or the theory is wrong We ca nt assume the machines must work because the theory has to be wrong just like we ca nt assume the theory must be right because the machines ca nt work Most people will continue not believing it s real even after being confronted with such device They will stand there screaming about the laws of thermodynamics People like the inventors twin brother or their wife Not very likely to convince a wikipedian if you ca nt convince your wife now it is The suppression is not so much executed by special interest groups as by the mainstream dogma The dogma is however much supported by the special interests Signs of real professional free energy suppression you can see here on wikipedia Every actor in history is worthy of his own page but weird inventions not confirmed by mainstream science working or not is irrelevant apparently ca nt have a page here The few free energy machines still having their own wikipedia page are full of rant how crackpots try to destroy the laws of thermodynamics and how nutterish they are not your usual trolling but the work of experts Take the introduction of the Water fuel cell the source of this addition energy has not been scientifically identified therefore the theory is treated with skepticism There was barely any theory it just worked And it has not been investigated The way it s treated is not worthy of being in the description An encyclopedia should not instruct it s readers behaviour Tell me how to treat things huh such a practice conforms to the parameters of perpetual motion hence conclusive scientific investigation would either verify violation of thermodynamic law or identify the source of claimed additional energy But if there isn t going to be any scientific analysis ever then the laws of thermodynamics are nonsense If the best scientists can do is preach the laws then it s just not very likely they are right about the topic Then it says At least one car prototype reportedly powered by a water fuel cell has been assembled HUH what but but but You know what I mean Meyer s claims about the Water Fuel Cell and the car that it powered were found to be fraudulent by an Ohio court in 1996 His wiki use to say It failed to work during a required demonstration of the water fueled car An Ohio court found Stanley Meyer guilty of fraud in a case brought against him by disgruntled investors So he was scammed by his own investors What kind of person would do that with a known to work invention And why was this important information deleted Then it says Stanley Meyer was granted patents in the United States and abroad starting in 1989 The verifiability and scientific basis of the patents are controversial Now I know the water motor patents where granted after a working model was displayed You can see it in the application number There is no other way to get a patent on an electrolysis cell Because of those laws of thermodynamics you know You do know about those right You can see free energy suppression live at work when you see that the world famous American inventor Stanley Meyer was not worthy of his own wikipedia page It s obvious he ca nt have a page because that would violate conservation of energy right Paul Pantone does have his own page where again the working of his device is denied by no witness The GEET page however describes a Hindi film BTW Paul was also scammed by his investors ha ha Yull Brown is also not worthy of his own page Makes it kind of hard to write about free energy suppression when the suppressed and murdered inventors are not allowed the light of day What about William A Rhodes Dennis klein then no Isaac de Rivaz Daniel Dingle etc etc At least we still have the Oxyhydrogen page right haha This is how free energy suppression is done I would love to make a page for each one of them with most credible references but it s just not going to be allowed The wall of propaganda is much to thick I can think of better ways to kill myself ha ha here I ll also take the opportunity to remind you that we a