2 July 2006 UTC There was a poll earlier in the year that from memory couldn t even reach majority support for that interpretation although with the myriad growth of policy pages I ve got no idea where I d find it In any case however occasional attempts to enforce the written policy there have met with definite resistance and to my knowledge no action has ever been taken against anyone for making rollback edits along these lines This is somewhat understandable when one considers that a they could now be made by anyone with a download b it would be a complete waste of many hours of my time that could be spent helping the encyclopedia and c would achieve absolutely nothing Can you think of anything that wasting four hours of my time manually reverting two hundred automated edits instead of doing the same in fifteen minutes would achieve 16 03