FRENCH PRO AND WEMBLY PRO temmis expert has nade the assertion that french pro is as prestigous as wembley and us pro this is plain wrong I cited bud collins in his tennis history where he explicilty states that in 1963 rosewall won the two nost important pro events wembly beating hoad and us pro over laver no mention of french pro betty laver who discussing laver s 1967 year mentions his wembley wins 1964 7 us pro wins 64 866 67 and wimbledon pro 1967 and no mention of french pro which laver won in 1967 world of tennis yearbooks 1970 and 1971 where the rosewall and laver biographies list their wembley pro wins along with their slam wins no mention orf their french pro wins Alan trengove s art of tennis published in the mid 1960sm which interviewed all the leading pros who uniformnly named wembly as the most prestigous event Tennis expert repeatedly reinserts his assertion with no evidece whatsoever he provides no defence he is basically lying and that a lot worse than incivility stop liying stop being arrogamt and behave youself LEAVE 1964 ALONE jeffrey neave