Edit war brewing at Yosemite National Park If you have some spare energy please come and lend a hand Thanks Looked acted I was also approached recently with regards to possible edits to the Yosemite National Park article My input on the matter can be found at the following link user talk Edit Centric Hantavirus Risk in Yosemite Noted Thmc1 173 63 176 93 sill sockpuppeting REPLYU REQUSTED This person blocked sockmaster Thmc1 is still block evading by not logging in even after he was warned by SysAdmin Kudpung I would suggest that you block the suspected IPs 173 63176 93 74 88 160 244 as well as IPs used by his other blocked account Nyc88 and any other accounts affiliated w them Why are sockppuppets of a blocked sockmaster still allowed to edit even after ample warnings To make matters worse he even violated his block and continuted editing the day after he was blocked Please see Thmc1 sockpuppet investigation archive for latest investigation evidence No clue links would be helpful Actually I think it s the other way around if I m not mistaken I think I remember being mentioned to admin Ronhjones as a possible sockpuppet in the past few months in conjunction with an edit disagreement issue Are you stocking this address Is this some sort of retaliation First of all I have no idea who any of these other users are much less others who use this IP address 173 63 176 93 Hmm Thanks I think hadn t noticed the 173 above was the same as the 173 I just talked to still no clue why MBaxter showed up here Aw well keep on keepin on Vsmith Don t let 173 63 176 93 fool you It was him who attempted to mention this to RonHJones using IP 74 88 160 244 That IP was found to be one of 173 63 176 93 s sockpuppet and blocked after a recent investigation 173 63 176 93 is actually a sockpuppet of Thmc1 blocked for excessive sockpuppeting back in 2010 Even though 173 63 176 93 was ruled most likley as one of Thmc1 s sockpuppet he was let off with a warning For the full story I suggest that you check out Thmc1 s most recent investigation August 2012 The final assessment was one account Nyc88 permanently blocked one IP temporarily blocked and one left open with warning If he causes you anymore trouble you should report this to the SysAdmins and don t hesitate to mention the sockpuppet investigation The reverting of your edits is the same kind of BS he conducted on the London City article that got him blocked back in 2010 He has an anti UK bias amongst many and you can confirm this with user Eraserhead1 Preceding undated comment added Hantavirus VSmith I actually came to your talk page for a different reason and just happened to notice this It looks ridiculous and I think this MBaxter1 character is highly suspicious himself In the meantime can you please look at this story seen on the main CNN com page today I think that this Yosemite hantavirus story is worthy of at least brief mention in the article because it is now having international implications I just don t see a justification in ignoring it completely thanks 173 63 176 93 Does the article have a current events section The hantavirus bit isn t history and as it is notable it should be discussed on the hantavirus page haven t checked And no don t think we need a current events section on the page WP notnews User talk Vsmi