I didn t want to bring it into the debate as really it s irrelevant but equally I don t want to drag everyone to arbitration on an article we ve all spent time trying to perfect simply because a single editor seems to have agendas beyond the quality of the encyclopaedia Some of the unbalanced illogical and contrary positions being taken were simply getting too unbelievable There s only so long you can try to span the divide with someone who wants to blow up every bridge Excuse my ignorance though but what s a diffs