OK sorry for the delay in responding properly From what I can tell the bare facts of the matter are that you made edits to a number of LDS related articles and those edits were reverted by various editors myself included Now there are two main ways of viewing these facts one that your edits were consistent with Wikipedia policy and the editors who reverted them were not justified in doing so two that your edits were not consistent with Wikipedia policy and the other editors were justified in reverting them This is why I asked you about your understanding of Wikipedia policy you are relatively new here and despite your confidence that your edits were appropriate my view of them was that they violated several policies and guidelines It s natural for newcomers to take some time learning the ropes so it doesn t imply any malice on your part Since the heart of the conflict seems to be how you and I regard your edits in light of WP policy it seems best to isolate the points of policy where our understanding differs in hopes that we can establish areas of common ground from which we can work out other differences or at least agree about what we irreconcilably disagree It would be helpful though to know that you ve indeed read the pertinent policies so that we can speak with the same lingo and refer to the same general ideas Have you done this Thanks talk