I never proposed whitewash i e Peluchon s draft I proposed cutback or stub as per WP ATTACK which is close to a perfect fit BLP applies on a sliding scale to small corps and in this case it was decided that the CEO is a nonnotable redirect so anything that reflects badly on the principals should be treated similarly to BLP to some degree Only good sourced balanced data should appear I think the rest of your question should probably be referred to my talk also As near as I can tell all talk onwiki about five figures is rumormongering and fails V insofar as it applies to project space It just occurred to me maybe Mr Laurent doesn t have the money but he can certainly string out a cheap publicity stunt without it Anyway there are many explanations and no hard facts Deferring to a longer answer later I think WP DUCK applies Tell me am I editing constructively or not by asking that the article s subject be rightly legally identified according to authoritative sources I will be happy to add more other constructive edits to my edit history but I don t know how that would help much Sure we can talk court cases after we know what corporation s the court case is about Will anyone agree with me that the clause that CFTC corrected last month can now be corrected by us this month C mon that s easy