Candidate for deletion This seems like a serious article with some serious problems The lead Pseudophilosophy is a term has no sourcing The lead and especially the first paragraphy of an article is like a definition and therefore requires sourcing The body of the article is sourced but it s just a list of where pseudo philosophy has been used before but does not justify the lead I tried myself to quickly find some reliable source that would justify the lead but couldn t find anything The section Accusations against popular philosophers should probably be removed the way it is now Two of the entries are un cited and the Rand citation is by a writer of unknown qualifications Also I can see this section degenerating into a philosophy I hate list The article seems to me the way it is now to be a candidate for deletion