I have also offered to strike or reformat it I have tried showing that I am willing to attempt to change and make my comments abode within policy I am being declined on technicalities and accused of using technicalities I am not going to say the Arbcom decision decision was justified when it wasn t The actions are reminiscent of a communist form of government or a inquistion I believe that I ve exhibited a attitude that says I disagree however I am willing to make changes Reread the entire thread I made one sympathizing ocmment to a webpage I was blocked quire questionably when I exhibit that he block isn t needed What I fail to understand is how I can argue unblock without being accused of wikilawyering Wilf made a specific point and linked to it I read it and there was a clear exception I offered to refactor or change the phrasing How is that not exhibiting a block isn t nec