This article sounds like it was written by the UMWA It begins with adjectives like low wages and poor working conditions against what standard and goes on from there I m not saying that such those adjectives are wrong simply that they are debatable and have been debated for nearly a century It would be NPOV to say that the stikers were protesting their wages and working conditions without the adjectives NPOV also requires a decent respect for the opinions of the owners who sincerely believed that unions were instigators of violence Also unlike the prior comments in this discussion pertaining to certain unfortunate edits I m not saying that there weren t innocent and ill willed parties in this event I m simply suggesting that the history clearly coughs up both types of people on both sides of this conflict Contrary to that scholarship this article s premise is clearly that there was a good and evil side