You seem to be totally blind to Chomsky s characterisation of the situation That Chomsky is lending support to Faurisson s credibility i e passing off academic dishonesty and fraud as free speech issues calling Faurisson an apolitical liberal and selectively citing his work to make it appear that he s not antisemetic defending fraudulent research as findings and then claiming that findings is a totally neutral term which can include fraud etc is exactly the criticism leveled by his opponents and it seems to be a valid one I ve showed evidence of this repeatedly in this thread and you refuse to address it