Summary GA review see WP WIAGA for criteria Is it reasonably well written A Prose quality B MoS compliance Is it factually accurate and verifiable A References to sources B Citation of reliable sources where necessary C No original research Is it broad in its coverage A Major aspects B Focused Is it neutral Fair representation without bias Is it stable No edit wars etc Does it contain images to illustrate the topic A Images are copyright tagged and non free images have fair use rationales B Images are provided where possible and appropriate with suitable captions Overall Pass or Fail I m giving this article a Keep marking although some improvements to referencing would be desireable