While I am somewhat dissapointed by D Adamo s lack of footnotes and frustrated by his avoidance of indexes I haven t yet found a credible direct dispute to any significant claims of his I am aware of a text that might indicate behavior of lectins on stomach tissuus would need to be directly studied but I wasn t willing to spend in excess of 200 US iirc to find out what exactly it found depite it being a real scientificly strict apparently as I didn t actually get to read the study While not as rigourously strict with the science as it should be at least what is presented in his books ER4YT doesn t seem to be significantly paranormal or disprovable So while it has a stigma of pseudoscience that stigma hasn t really been justified Some supposed refutation I have come across turned out to be of even poorer quality either reflecting it s own pseudoscience or a lack of familiarity with the nominal subject I would really like to see some explicit maybe even rigorous debunking of D Adamo s occasionaly controversial I can t see why offerings As of yet I consider this closer to protoscience than unfalsifiable pseudoscience In any case I don t think that anything I previously posted on this matter is all that fantastic Is the mere mention of Doctor D Adamo or Eat Right For Your Type ER4YT enough to invalidate the respose I offered Other than that vague stigma is my above answer to the utility of divergent blood types unhelpful or incorrect I do believe that I was careful enough to avoid anything that wasn t NPOV Maybe I shouldn t have tread so lightly so as to provoke more of a direct response Because while I like how it advocates my Type O consumption of most animal proteins I find it s avoid lists including wheat and dairy to be cumbersome