Bohr s Philosophy Hello and thanks for your critique on my slight though important changes to the article I d like to comment that previous to my changes the particular part was absolute horrible writing strictly from a stylistic point of of view while my changes morphed that into a well balanced clean structure that semantically integrated into the overall flow of the previous text Furthermore your deletion based on arguable and vague stylistic opinion while ignoring a more important semantic correction without which many are misled to believe that Bohr was an atheist unarguably makes you appear to have done it in an attempt of an ideological censorship Although I m sure you have had no such intentions your removal of only one side of the story points directly to your own dogmas on the subject As someone who I believe appreciates freedom of speech and honest representation of views in Wikipedia you can understand my arguments If you wish to discuss the style of the change I m more than open to discuss it with you but I think your fine reputation ought to prevent you from silently deleting it in the future Therefore relying on it I m reposting the correction which we can later collaboratively polish to your liking Finally as we are on the subject I have done an extensive search and to my knowledge Bohr never called himself an atheist and the references for this statement Bohr s disagreements with the philosopher mostly stemmed from Bohr s atheism seem completely unsupportive of the thesis statements by anybody but the man himself can hardly prove such a blunt declaration about such rigorous subjects as religion and philosophy What are your thoughts on that