4 May 2009 UTC I disagree that there is a consensus when there are so few editors involved in the discussion Certainly the views of SPAs can be safely excluded nevertheless I have decided not to continue to argue my point You have utterly failed to explain why keeping a perfectly good reference out of the article is a good thing but I no longer have the will to argue against the majority Sometimes the senseless outnumber the sensible that s probably how Bush managed to twice get elected 02 04