Well since we re making a list individual bootlegs don t need to be notable themselves but I know what you mean we need some standards for inclusion As with the sketchy nature of bootlegs themselves we need to make sure we included only actual bootlegs I mean bootleg in the traditional sense of the word Generally I would say if we can find enough information to write a short paragraph or so on it then let s include it Most of the sources for this information is going to be found on personal sites of collectors and not really verifiable so I would say for every inclusion we should have at least two independent sources Unless you got a book on Who bootlegs I tried to track down my friend s but he couldn t find it I m sure you ve found these sites already but these are what I ve been using A little overwhelming at first I know but has the most bootlegs including obscure variations Hasn t been updated in forever Mentions The Who The Illustrated Discography as his source which I believe is what my friend s book is called I still need to do some research before I starting putting together an article so feel free to start it I m gon na try to get a hold of that book I might just go an buy myself a copy Another thing we should include is this