I don t but I think that it s fine how it is as it seems to me that it adds length without adding clarity 21 56 15 Feb 2005 UTC Construction animation There are links on this article to a Korean heptadecagon construction animation which is good besides being unable to read it But I m wondering since Wikipedia should be a repository of knowledge and not a collection of links to other places with that knowledge should I post a heptadecagon construction animation as I have for other polygons I m hesitant because it d be messy and about 360 KB 21 56 15 Feb 2005 UTC