Look I m begging you please try to understand this individual case I m pointing out that since the fact is so well known regardless of whether wikipedia editors are ignorant of the fact that it doesn t need a citation It just looks messy and could become chaotic in the future The essential problem here is that you don t seem to understand that this is an individual case and doesn t come under the jurisdiction of that policy you have mentioned And I wouldn t need to make personal attacks if users actually thought about what they were typing rather than behaving like mindless wiki drones