Lou Dobbs and Glen Beck believe what you put on the fringes not just what you say is more mainstream so you re wrong on that one We already have it established that people have formed conspiracy theories around this and the article establishes that main stream types believe The article also establishes that people think it s nutso The introduction is not the place to include all of that and it already mentions that it is part of some conspiracy theories in the intro Basically there s no point in including any of this I said before my issue is not with the information in the article but where it is put and the wording used Addressing one won t address the other One article calling it an urban legend is also not sufficient to include the wording It seems more like you are just looking for a new label to discredit the opinion since the conspiracy mention no longer does so