Dispute over Human Rights Watch citation This edit is the latest in a minor fracas over this cite which fracas began here when Wehwalt removed the cite from the lede describing HRW as a pressure group Actually in this controversial topic probably the majority of sources could be described as pressure groups but that doesn t make them reliable when properly cited I restored the cite in a less prominent position here at which point Wehwalt added a rebuttal sentence with edit summary added explanation of why the IDF knocked down these structures consolidated into the Background section I found this problematic because the article doesn t actually say what Wehwalt added it says that the group analyzed the claims by the IDF and found them to be largely bogus So to leave Wehwalt s edit in place creates a false impression of what the HRW reports I modified the section according which edit was then reverted by Wehwalt I m going to leave it alone for a day or so to give Wehwalt the opportunity to clean it up Incidentally in Wehwalt s latest edit summary he says that This is the article on Corrie not on home demolitions We are to give the reader a modicum of info on this not draw conclusions First of all it seems to me that Corrie is only notable because of home demolitions Secondly giving the reader a modicum of info would be best served by an accurate summary of the HRW cite whereas altering it for POV reasons would be an example of drawing conclusions