In my opinion you re confusing different policies You say that everything you write there is sourced for the sake of the argument I shan t dispute that even though a very good point is raised there regarding the difference between sourced and attributed However sourcing is required to comply with Wikipedia s policy on verifiability Soapboxing advocating and giving undue weight on the contrary are not permitted under Wikipedia s policy on neutrality So even if everything you state there is sourced it still can t be included if it violates WP NPOV It s not a matter of not liking what sources have to say it s just that they are only opinions I don t think criticism should be hidden or Amanda s guilt taken for granted Actually I don t even know if she did it because quite frankly I never studied the case but I m convinced that if a Court of law convicted her there must have been sufficient evidence to warrant that Italy s not Soviet Russia My point is that the article shouldn t mainly revolve around criticism of the trial or attempts at soiling Guede s reputation by implying that he was a lone killer as that primarily violates WP BLP Wikipedia is not there to retry Amanda As I ve said I agree that criticism should be reported it is notable and rather easily sourced However that should not be the focus of the article Finally as I wrote on the article s page technically the trial record is publicly avalaible but that doesn t mean that it was actually accessed or published even in Italian for that matters Let s talk bout it