As for an explanation I believe that the shortness of the article and the length of the controversy section constitute a potentially nnpov wikipedia article The DNC has been an organization since 1848 and the inclusion of a relatively long 1996 fundraising scandal section causes the article to lose its balance If the article is nt balanced then it has a nnpov This controversy already has a very long page on its own and it is my opinion that it should stay on its own page until this article is more fleshed out Without a more complete article the fundraising controversy throws off any balance the article could have I would rather see a sterile article than a unbalanced and potentially nnpov article What are your thoughts on the matter Does anyone else have anything to add