1 I asked you what actual contributions you ve made to her articles besides your pointless edits and I constructive edits to the lead 2 The whole WP UNDUE is about going with what the majority of critics use instead of a select few Let s pretend articles are critics shall we 98 of critics use composition 2 use content Now by following those guidelines you would have to use composition If you want I have plenty of other users that will agree with me here Using content might work on relatively unknown articles but all the articles that millions of people see and that actually matter we use composition 3 That little content section you made was a shitty copy and paste job from compositions that I ve created every single one of them from pages which I ve also written the majority of if not all of them you didn t even include the others or put a construction banner to show you were still working on it Also you divided it from 1 9 and 10 19 What in the world were you thinking Even for double disk articles we don t do that articles are treated as a single body of work So no I didn t remove your content section becaus of the title I removed it because it was messy incoherent uncompleted mess that shone a bad light onto the article Note Your entire reason behind your proposed title is your own opinion so I d be advised to drop that argument