I have rewritten the article here User Callsfortruth sandbox1 in the manner that I think it should be presented I backed every edit that I made regarding the cables with secondary sources from newspapers media outlets think tanks etc and I phrased edits that are already referenced by secondary sources in the way that they are mentioned therein Furthermore I removed all edits that are referenced only by an online CV as it is a primary source and can not be considered as reliable Lastly I did not add a criticism section yet I added subsections which do not mention corruption outright but do mention that there are allegations All of these are properly sourced and edits that portray the person in a negative light according to guidelines should only be removed if they are poorly sourced or unsourced which is not the case If the article was devoid of any properly sourced mentions of criticism then it would be a hagiography which I believe is not the purpose of an encyclopedia