I thought about it some more and I think the basic issue between us is a philosophical one I ll bet you think that the cancer article is done so all it really needs are references I will further venture to guess that you feel this way because you wrote a good part of the article I on the other hand do not feel that it is anywhere near done though I do think it is good It doesn t have the depth that a truly great article will have in that it does not yet reflect the state of knowledge about a topic There are thin weak areas that need more text and I think we are a ways away from touching the bottom here so this is the real reason why I think references are not quite enough So nothing against all the hard work you ve no doubt put in to this point there s just a long ways to go