Didn t call it abuse of administrator s rights at all ever As I said there was no consensus in the AFD as of yet In addition you clearly don t understand what the purpose of an AFD is A person disagreeing with consensus and presenting alternative arguments is perfectly fine In the case of the AFD you re referring to I presented an argument about his notability that is perfectly solid based on our established guidelines for biographies Just because a person disagrees with you doesn t mean that it s abuse of powers or disruptive