Did you READ the source It is dated 2011 Your work is sloppy slipshod If you don t read the link how can you comment on it How can you render judgement as to its credibility It is far easier to click a button than to be a real copy editor Further I am going to go through this article and remove all text that isn t verified here which will probably be more than half of the article Instead of specifically targeting one person perhaps you could make an actual contribution to this article as a whole You seem more concerned with exercising internet editor power than contributing to knowledge and readership