GA Reassessment This discussion is transcluded from Talk Calvin and Hobbes GA2 The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment I feel doubtful that this article still meets the GAC First of all it fails 2b because a there are Citation needed tags in the Style and influences and Books sections and b according to a maintenance tag which has been in the article since March there are primary sources throughout the article GAs should have neither unsourced information nor primary sources Anyway that s my review Push to talk