I think we had better stick with the Tafsir al Jalalayn version which uses begot and begotten If Islamic scholars are happy with it who am I to argue Anyway it does seem to refute the belief in the Son of God and also that we are created in his likeness So maybe it is saying no God didn t have a son and you were not created in his image which would require the use of begot as given by the Tafsir al Jalalayn