You are wrong my dear Fralembert Ahunt split the article and achieved what he felt to be a balance So we now have an article with a snapshot of previously hidden park history Alissa Apostle in her 1997 Queen s University Thesis says the park s history was erased and re writtenand my research pretty well confirms her conclusion as well as a brief discussion of sites and activities Moreover there was almost nothing on the wildlife the flora the forest the geology the hydrology and the climate before I edited the article So why did you not make a point of it when the article was very poor sketchy Besides you are free to add such material should you be so inclined And where else in the whole world will you find such a clear and condensed overview of the park s history as well as threats facing the park The point of my contribution is to help wikipedia visitors understand what is really going on in Gatineau Park talk