It was vandalism but not mine Your images have extremely bad lighting and are not encyclopedic quality in the least One of them replaced a photo of a street in the article for that street Brickell Avenue and doesn t even show the street THE ARTICLE IS ABOUT THE STREET Also you re supposed to answer a talk on the same page Yours that it initiated on not put the answer on the initiators page so there are 2 half conversations on two separate pages I suggest you read a bit more about Wikipedia rules and stop vandalizing articles with your crappy poor lighting amateur photography from car windows 66 176 139 222