I think that this particular issue has not been addressed sufficiently and does not meet the requirements for consensus to emerge and be settled especially with editors who haven t read the full text to be able to reach a founded conclusion I also consider that editors that have not read the full text of the reference are not allowed to claim establishment of any consensus Of course other people could be involved in discussion but only those who have read the full text to see some relevance to the topic of the article memory of dissolved substances and not some vague impressions got by reading only the abstract 5 15 46 114