To be fair ip 184 has stated at least twice that he does not care about promoting his books the content ip 184 deleted was infact a violation of WP rs which he did state on at least one of the deletions ip 184 has posted at least 60 references that do fall within wp rs guidelines Ip 184 has also stated that they only wish to be acknowledge for the ground breaking information which may be true I hope i m not being forward and forgiving me for assuming this ip 184 if it is not true but I think ip 184 wishes to be acknowledged for rediscovering information Perhaps ip 184 should state things in 3rd person via wp rs The guidelines state that work may be added as long as it directly contributes to the article in which case imho it does I think if ip 184 would read and follow the guidelines they might be far more welcomed within this community To be more fair a request is not a demand and therefore not a violation of policy The only legitimate issue here is that 184 does not sign their post Don t really think that s ban worthy but I think they know why they are banned 99 25 73 37