January 2009 UTC If Wikipedia decides to semi protect or totally protect a generic conceptual confusion then stupidity must have reached its top Worse than that can it not become An encyclopedia that guards total conceptual confusion with all its forces must be a world and historical record of stupidity Can the editors of Wikipedia really agree on protection of conceptual confusion like yes the article about clade is a mess and we protect this mess We also protect propagation of this mess into other concepts in this encyclopedia We do not allow any resolving contribution of this confusion anywhere in this encyclopedia It is a cladistic encyclopedia We like conceptual messes Such protection would at least be typically cladistic Take care because cladistics does actually deny that 1 1 Mats presently at 83 254 20 63 23 39 8