ps i do nt need new articles as the articles cited do nt add up to the article on wikipedia there are many simple and obvious issues and problems with the way the thing is typed out by all means meet me on the talk pages and explain how 13 13 outlets had machida but espn does not explain how dana f white is a neutral or relevant authority on mma judging or how davis had no significant offence and machida blocked takedowns when davis takedowns and gnp is scored and machidas tdd is not these are facts not opinion if you want me to cite the unified rules and dana white litany of bs i will happily do so thanks 77 101 41 108