March 2014 UTC Hyperbole aside I didn t readd any of your removed links to the user generated forums nor did I remove your removed thinktank external links I also left most of your undue tags I only removed the overarching one The article is in need of all viewpoints but if you want to categorically exclude the most cited advocates for one side of the argument Kleck and Lott there s never a chance of this article being balanced You need to articulate your objectsions to those sections more specifically or better yet because I find their language quite mild by many of our contentious articles add to the sections on other research 20 08 16