Hello Sometimes we agree Sometimes we don t but it s all good as far as I am concerned I was not referring to you in any of my comments about shenanigans at NARM The troublesome editors are often single purpose and appear to be new These editors do a grave disservice because their noise tends to shield an editor like Cirt from legitimate criticisms and scrutiny You will notice that I did quite the opposite of what Cirt wanted at Santorum neologism I am not any way in the habit of backing up Cirt It just happens that often he s right though sometimes he s wrong And I dislike the sock campaigns that have been been related to the Landmark Education and Church of Scientology articles and turned personal against Cirt Talk