Note to Nishkid You have blocked me from sending an email from this site to you and also have taken me off sending an email from this site to Riana Below is the entire message I sent Rianna which you conveniently altered Further Rianna knows full well she asked for a change to the get site today because the article had not been edited for three days She asked to change a couple of lines relating to Ms Bruker and to remove the fact that she had an affair because it was not relevant to ths issue Bruno then denied her change This was in the history of edits secions which I somewhere have saved Nishkid then changed the history section to show Rianna s change without the notice of line was changed This is fraud and if an attorney did this in Federal Court he would be disbarred and possibly charged with contempt of court In response to Nishkid s question in the email to me I think that he is not telling the truth and is equivocating about what Rianna really sent to her From what I have read on her page she would be quite offended at the vindictive behaviour of these men I was talking to Riana at the time she saw your message and she had no idea what you were talking about Care to enlighten us where you first contacted Riana On 10 28 07 Sagbliss wrote Rianna absolutely asked that there be a reversion which was poopooed by Bruno You have not read a thing Originally Riana had the second to last post which you have fraudulently reverted to the last post Bruno had undone it Although I right now do not have in front of me the history edit I am saving all your pearls of wisdom I do have a copy of an email which I sent to Riana I will see that your tampering with the site is dealt with This is fraud and deceit All the history of what went on the site in the last few days is available on the server The email continued with the entire article and a couple of more statements User talk Riana From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia I sent you a message which I am not sure I put on the correct page I am a busy woman who has worked on get issues and am very familiar with the get case in Canada which is emerging law on the barriers to remarriage This fellow Bruno is a vindictive fellow The issue is to remove barriers to remarriage for women All the men involved are abusive The whole article is contextualy wrong The correct article which has been blocked from the WIkipedia site I framed the article with the titles that were originally written Each and every section has cites which all these men have not read including Nishkid who is siding with these men You are a woman Whether you are Jewish or Muslim a man could do this to you one day Read the correct version of the article And further look at Nishkid s talk page and the notes at the bottom of my user page which admits that he has not read And do note that your suggestion was ignored Farmbrough stated the same thing as you It was ignored Sagbliss 17 04 28 October 2007 UTC Nishkid64 You falsely send me