Who cares about indenting and signing and other wikilawyering rules when you have a high importance article so filled with falsehoods that everyone who reads it comes away knowing less than they did before they read the article Embarassment is not even a strong enough word for what a farce this article this The lead is hardly even the worst part You list influence and reception in France as if only the French ever Heidegger to name just the most ridiculous error here I was in the middle of trying to fix this and you block the page in order to win rather than work with me to make constructive improvements to an article that is in desperate need of new content since almost everything currently in there needs to be deleted because it is a distroting misrepresentation and makes no logical sense Sad to see you all care more about winning than improving the article or having an encylopedic article on a major philosopher that does not actively contribute to vulgar misconceptions about him and that actively spreads ignorance and reads like a machine translated piece of vandalism