Problems I am having with Sante Kimes article and changes I am wanting to document issues I am having with edits on Sante Kimes article All content herein refer to said article Moments ago I edited the lead content for the article My reason for doing this is because the lead was repetitious As I wrote in the editing note which state Repetitious lead Lead info is covered in the article in same order Previous lead was not whitewashed Kimes is best known for 2 murders and the locations This correction is neutral and factual I believe the change I made was of a neutral point of view and was supported by referenced links within said article The change I made had previously been posted by an administrator that I am apparently having trouble with I had hoped to work with the administrator in a constructive effort to improve the said article However it appears that said administrator is making changes to said article out of spite or personal feelings against me or the article s subject I had mentioned to the administrator in said article s discussion page that is they had a problem with the articles subject then maybe another administrator could assist me in creating a neutral point of view for the article On the said article s discussion page there have been several biased statements by said administrator about the article s subject And I feel about me simply because I would like the said article to be balanced and neutral I am wanting to document any issue here as so that if there is a problem later it has been documented on my talk page NOTE I am not naming the administrator as a favor even though I doubt the attempted favor will be appreciated Furthermore if there is a problem later I do have it I m sure the said administrator will read this and take offense however this is being done to protect myself in any potential future problem