I don t know about logic but policy will hopefully As F says having multiple well sourced viewpoints in the article is fine Removing references that you don t like because you only hold to one perspective is of course unacceptable I ve blocked Alan347 for 31 hours for repeatedly violating this policy Now maybe there s something wrong with those references I don t know Maybe they re not WP RS or WP DUE or something else and I have no problem with Alan347 or anyone else discussing that issue here or at a relevant noticeboard and maybe eventually consensus will agree to remove them But edit warring to push a POV not so good So you know play nice everyone