For the benefit of those who may be following this discussion I ll post my clarification from your talk page Looking at the games in order of best sales they d be VII X VIII IX X 2 VI etc Obviously Sephiroth merits his own article and Seymour probably makes sense as well but out of the next titles Kuja s got one while Ultimecia Kefka and Shuyin don t Given this and Kuja s already substantial section on the list of FFIX s characters as well as the fact that describing IX s story comprehensively will require a pretty thorough explanation of him anyway sales figures aside he is the central conflict of the game really the same can t really be said of Seifer with VIII or Seymour in X in order for them to get proper coverage they d have to get their own articles it seems to me like him having his own article s kind of unnecessary Any discussion of him is really a discussion of the game s story and any discussion of the game s story is going to largely be a discussion of him so I just think it will probably make for some somewhat unnecessary reiteration across the three articles Final Fantasy IX List of Final Fantasy IX characters and Kuja He s certainly a notable villain though I m just saying that in light of the treatment of most of the other notable villains and given the already thorough treatment of Kuja s role it seems somewhat unnecessary for him to have his own article By the way I would say we re always POV in how we decide such matters Deciding matters of inclusion is inherently going to be based on POV However that isn t a problem as policy for neutral point of view only applies to how information s presented not how it s selected By necessity selecting information for inclusion is a half POV half NPOV matter based on notability POV and verifiability NPOV