You mention POV pushing from my source However on the contrary you cherry pick Euwes 100 year old comment where the actual Krabbe article STATES THE CONTRARY You are misquoting the source you cite Furthermore the blunder you feature you say that black has a better pawn structure If you insisit on being accurate you should actually say BLACK IS UP A CLEAR PAWN Also you state some weird line where I QUOTE After 6 Ne5 White chases again with 7 f4 Then after 7 Ng6 the game usually continues 8 e5 Ng8 9 d6 completing the most commonly seen sequence in the Gambit see diagram In this position White is on the attack and his attack will generally persevere with tactics such as Nb5 after a pawn trade at d6 However Black can return the piece with a slightly better endgame after making White overextend his pawns by 7 Neg4 8 e5 Bc5 9 exf6 Nxf6 and now White s best followup is to head for an uninspiring endgame with 10 Qe2 Qe7 11 Qxe7 Kxe7 THERE IS NO SOURCE FOR THIS CLAIM SOURCE IT THEN HOLD YOUR OWN ARTICLE TO THE SAME STANDARD YOU ARE HOLDING ME TO FOR NOT REASON JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT LIKE THE WAY I TALK Wikipedia as you have so eloquently stated is not for anyone An analogy which so strikingly represents the world 166 137 88 42