As much as I appreciate getting the TJF minority view into the language I still remain largely opposed to commentary and this sort of authorship This will only serve to add more text to the commentary inviting further commentary I m not against mentioning the minority report if it s only used to mention dissent among the TJF historical staff without getting into details I would suggest appending one brief comment to this effect to the existing TJF comment While we re on the topic of sources ref s 198 and 199 still need to be corrected replaced or removed They ve been like this for about a week now