This article is currently not balanced It provides only a cursory summary of the official report and then an excessively long section on the disputed account This gives the incorrect impression that the official account is inadequate or wrong Ultimately there is one fact that is not disputed Captain Asseline flew the aircraft into a stall This is a very bad thing for a pilot to do at any time and a cardinal sin when done 30 ft above the ground The evidence is clear the plane was at alphamax high angle of attack at very low airspeed and with engine set to idle Asseline has nobody else to blame for putting the plane into such a dangerous configuration he was in command All the other distracting issues eg precise altitude wearing a headset engine lag in responding to throttle up command etc etc are little more than red herrings because none of them excuse the fact that the plane stalled due to pilot error There is a lot of evidence in the official report I haven t been able to find a version translated into English it s pretty clear what actually happened Oh and reference 3 is a bit dubious full of wacky conspiracy theories with no evidence to back them up I propose that the article needs a major overhaul trimming a lot out of the disputed account and providing more information from the official report