fringe Alun wrote far too much and far too pov if POV means not NPOV i challenge you to identify text which isn t presented neutrally i e not favoring a side but neutrally stating other people s opinions then lets improve that text fringe theories shoud not have so much space per NPOV All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view representing significant views fairly proportionately and without bias a view that is mentioned in almost every discussion of the topic should be described fairly and in proportion to the attention it receives the addition was entirely promoting a singe point of view a view that was not previously missing from the article provide arguments against as well or it s pov pushing the 4 3 Environmental impacts section does just that but if there are specific points that should be added or changed i encourage further targeted development demanding perfection in every edit seems inappropriate