MarnetteD clearly has a watch list longer than my arm given his response time to reverting things so he ll see what s been done and will just have to deal with it While categories may require reliable sourcing to a degree the fact remains than for so many actors dating back to the 50s 60s 70s especially there is unlikely to be centralised sourcing though many books are in print such as actor biogs few editors are really going to dig them all out and cite hundreds of actors entire career for each TV and film appearance it would take months even years of effort Wikipedia Citing IMDb notes that IMDB has been a constant source of dispute over its reliability However for a category to simply state this person was a Western genre TV actor hardly requires AAA rated reliable sourcing and I do believe than IMDB meets the requirements as a tertiary source confirming the fact that all those actors were active in that genre Many of the individual articles for each Western TV series don t contain any more sourcing than IMDB so it is not wrong to identify MarnetteD s reverts as missing the point when it comes to avoiding WP POINTed behaviour A tertiary source is better than no source at all and categories are hardly top level articles worth war editing over I find his behaviour protracted bullyish and contrived as well as completely lacking WP AGF standards He needs to holster his attitude because I m not afraid to present his behaviour including repeated history of the same behaviour to ANI EW and request that action be taken for his abuse of policy and anti IP sniping motions The lack of maturity exhibited in reverting those articles without consensus openly taking advantage of my 48 hour block will not be seen in good taste as it was clearly an opportunistic move but a very stupid one which I don t take lightly WP BURO and WP IAR applies here We don t need strict reliable sourcing for a category as all those actors have an IMDB page the majority of those IMDB pages are accurate and if the category aims to improve wiki by indexing all the actors of that genre it is for the better To filter out those which lack a reliable source lacks NPOV because there are dozens of categories which make statements about things and people which don t have strong sourcing But in this case knowing an actor was a Western TV actor is hardly controversial If MarnetteD reverts a single page he should be prepared to back it up with something other than WP DEFINING which is a guideline not policy but so far as if the characteristic would not be appropriate to mention in the lead portion of an article it is probably not defining goes there are considerably more articles that don t follow that ideal to the letter than do which makes it a weak guideline to attempt to enforce unless an editor has a strong motive to do so If he enjoys attention and drama I expect to see him an ANI EW before the week s out 82 8 252 13