Thank you for the apology obviously I was offended and I lost my cool I apologize for calling you liar slamming your beliefs and to all who ve read this It won t happen again I have legitimate policy related concerns about that entry as a whole While my concerns are legitimate I ve failed repeatedly at communicating my intent In the future I will use appropriate procedures to rectify them if they can t be worked out Thank you again for being the bigger person Hopefully we can work together to keep our exchanges constructive and find common ground To be clear about my beliefs please realize that there is third side to this conspiracy coin I am on the third side of the coin It is the side of this argument who can look at the facts sources evidence and context and see that both the claims of chemtrail theorists and those of the counter theorist are dubious None of this can be done if the terminology is not precisely defined My personal opinion is and I have a degree in this field is that we have the paranoid delusional theorists arguing with the regular delusional counter theorists Let us step back and neutrally state the facts If you are on one of the other sides of the coin we need to talk about POV The topic of my research CBW is difficult to approach without those one the other sides of this coin accusing my of being on the opposing side I am afraid to state the known historical facts because but each side believes my idea is the POV of the other To keep the entry neutral the nuts point of view needs to be defined dissected and dismissed however I am concerned that both sides are nuts Please consider this when reading my posts reviewing my edits or reverting I am no chemtrail theorist and am highly offended by such accusations I support neither claim Let us differentiate the has happened from what is happening This topic can not be approached with out it Thank you for letting me set the record strait