Well I ll give you my opinion I wrote the Intervals section and I admit that I didn t write it well at all It was one of my first Wiki contribs and it sucked quite honestly I would encourage someone to re write it if they want to or I will when I have time to mull it over and do it properly However as far as the specific point over whether it relates to the article harmony can not exist without intervals When two distinct by which I mean different pitches are sounded the interval between them is what creates harmony Harmony and interval relationships are inseparable because they re one and the same So absolutely a section explaining intervals is relevant However the way in which I went about explaining it in my contrib wasn t so great Again I would encourage a competent and learned musician to do a re write or wait and I ll do it I will say one other thing which is that Wikipedia is a learning reference and will serve its best use to the public if Average Joe can come along and glean complete information from non confusing articles My ideal is this say a churchgoing person one who has very limited musical knowledge wants to learn how to sing the alto tenor bass whatever line in hymns so that he she can feel more one with God on Sunday mornings I want for that person to be able to look at this article and come away with a clear idea of how harmonies work so that he she can practice singing them The oneand onlything which creates the alto tenor and bass lines are the fact that they re pitched at an interval to the melody soprano line Again intervals and harmonies are one and the same For the large percentage of the population who struggles with learning things by ear a comfortably firm understanding of interval relationships is along with practice thereafter the magic key to unlocking the ability to hear discern harmonies That s why I think it s important to keep the section in question but to rewrite it