Section 1b of the GACR states it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections layout words to watch fiction and list incorporation Refering to MOS LAYOUT we are drawn to section 3 4 Notes and references It begins For how to generate and format these sections see Help Footnotes and Wikipedia Citing sources Wikipedia Citing sources aka WP REF includes section 6 1 Variation in citation methods aka WP CITEVAR Extracted guidlelines of note from sections 6 1 1 and 6 1 2 To be avoided Switching between major citation styles e g switching between parenthetical and tags or between the style preferred by one academic discipline vs another Generally considered helpful Imposing one style on an article with incompatible citation styles e g some of the citations in footnotes and others as parenthetical references an improvement because it makes the formatting consistent By following GA criteria I am led with no uncertainty to a sound conclusion and made the reasonable request that all references be made consistent They are currently a mixed bag of s and Per WP CITEVAR this is avoidable and unhelpful and therefore unacceptable in my opinion it fails the GAN requirement to follow MOS LAYOUT closely enough I will be failing this part of the GA nomination should the article remain a mixed bag per WP GACR which is built upon consensus that affects ALL of wikipedia and ALL GA nominations A local consensus can not seek to make an exception for one off nominations WP IAR does not apply here Let s bear in mind one final point I don t answer to the likes of you because your flamboyant attitude damages Wiki it doesn t help it chat