I m not sure from that comment how much you understand about research in this area There is for example a dispute about the validity of self reported results in the general evidence base for CBT which has gained momentum in the last five years A lot of new work has been done since 2004 that would throw those claims into dispute At the moment you are giving prominence to a one country study in a controversial area that is itself 8 years old That is cherry picking as the table gives a false impression of CBT s position in the pantheon of methods I can understand an advocate pushing it but we have to be balanced here TALK