I think it s a topic that our structure prevents us from ever having a policy compliant article on It will simply be a festering sore forever since our normal methods for dealing with source bias will always be circumvented by the large number of editors that view any questioning of the sources as being an attack on Christianity Compare this thing with Haile Selassie where the relatively small number of Rastafarian editors don t present a problem but no one accuses the rest of us as possessing some kind of evil bias against Rastafarians just because we wouldn t tend to take their claims about Haile Selassie at face value