He was claiming that an article that said neglect could be used as a source for a statement that said discrimination There were several other such instances of misrepresentation in the past hour alone during which among other things he accused me of making a covert attack on his religion When I pointed out that neglect should not be paraphrased as discrimination he said they had the same connotation And you are trying to say that your inability to comprehend that one word does not mean the same thing as another does not portend well for any article you write is unacceptable What is unacceptable about it Is he not apparently unable to comprehend that the two words are not interchangeable Exploitation Neglect etc are all terms with a negative connotation Pettifoggery is nt going to change the fact that a spade is a spade Is that not likely to negatively impact any article he writes And where do you get off telling me how to handle him or making strange warnings If you can handle him better why are you not trying to fix these articles that POV pushers muck up on a regular basis An abdication of responsibility that s only made worse by your coming and telling me that you think I am being uncivil when I have made the utmost effort over months to encourage this editor to avoid making personal attacks I am this close to taking this to AN I as an unconscionable abuse of admin power