The author of the article you mention is me So of course I don t contest the notability of the subject I was merely mentioning BOMBARD to highlight the fact that lots of references is meaningless No if you or me or somebody else was to use the existing refs to expand the article to over 1 500 characters excluding tables and references then I would remove the stub tag myself 1 500 of course being the usual benchmark for a stub article And no you did not use BRD you were B removing the stub tag I was R restoring the stub tag I was also D explaining at your talk page but then you went and reverted again So no you did not use BRD and yes you broke WP 1RR as you yourself admitted Snowman