LK a couple of thoughts 1 It s counter productive to call someone s good faith efforts WP agf to improve an article ie reverting your edits vandalism Think twice before making that claim 2 please read WP npov carefully I am not going to debate whether Islam and yellowstone can be reliably sourced but I will contend that it s a topic that will violate undue weight of our NPOV policy when seen in the light of the yellowstone article and is unlikely to be allowed to remain There are 1 000s of tidbits of content that could be added to article but aren t because of undue weight Again please consider drafting an independent article on the subject and if it can pass muster can surely be linked to the main article LK