Dear Yiyu Don t work too much on the Mao article here whatever you agree on will have no real strength behind it because you are not working with other editors and when you polish something together it will ultimately be destroyed by those that had no part in it You also need to watch out for what wikipedia calls weasel terms that are used in the draft above weasel terms are ways of saying thing that really avoid the issue If an editor says some analysts believe it really means I don t know who believes it but I want it in this article Unfortunately the current wiki has no way to decide truth and lies The best you can do is present all sides not just one or two and cite evidence For everything that is a lie you can add sentences describing why it is untrue There have been some movements to give weight to editors that are educated in one area more than those that are just shooting their mouths off but they have failed As we all know many times history has been distorted and many people have been fooled so don t be too sure that you know what really happened when all most of us really have are hand me down stories Lastly be sure not to get too wrapped up in articles Find other articles to edit and your experience will be much more fulfilling Come to visit Mao often and put it on your watchlist but don t let it consume you or sour you on wikipedia I can guarantee you that 10 years from now there will STILL be edit wars on the Mao page Working through the night to make a perfect article won t stop someone from getting up in the morning and ruining your delicate balancing act You probably have great insight into many things that are completely uncovered in Wiki give those a try sometime Hope this helps Gummy