Arguing with a source inline is not an improvement for whatever views aren t being mentioned Merely arguing against a source from your personal knowledge or opinion is original work not what we do here In particular you miss the point by noting that carbon reductions from wind power occur wherever the wind power gets consumed because the article is not primarily about carbon reduction it s about how grid managers can handle intermittent power sources on the grid The intermittencies of wind and solar power matter because the grid functions not only to generate carbon offsets but also and primarily to supply electricity when customers demand it