Striptease I have been editing the wikipedia for years and some of my articles such music hall have been awarded good article status Why are you treating me like an idiot and saying I should use the sandbox I KNOW what is wikipedia policy and I KNOW that lists of songs and books on a particular subject don t have to have individual citations But if you feel this way why didn t you put a citation required tag on it rather than just deleting a whole section in such a high handed way Bernard Rose s song The Stripper includes the word stripper in its title so it is obvious what it is about The original research requirement on the wikipedia was put there because some people were e g improving on Einstein s theory of relativity with their own theories it wasn t meant to include lists of mundane every day things about which there is no dispute like list of types of dog for instance or songs on the same subject Some things are self evident Why can t you discuss this in a rational way rather than just throwing around a disputed interpretation of a wikipedia law without even mentioning it on the talk page and then penalising anybody who disagrees with you There are a few admins who regularly edit the striptease article and none of them has ever deleted that section Are they wrong and you right I will ask other admins their opinion on this