Simple solution Rename the article to Dhimmi according to Bat Ye or and Bernard Lewis The article is overburdened with the views of a handful of orientalists In addition to that as Tony points out the article is effectively a series of polemic statements deriding the historic practices that occured under the Dhimmi system If this article isn t a commentary and POV driven indictment on history then there s the burden to prove that Shariah as practiced today also supports the kinds of restrictions on dhimma that the article claims it to Sections discussing history should make it clear that their content is historical and should not contrast events and policies practiced in the 8th or 10th century with standards we accept today Sections dealing with contemporary usage of dhimma in countries that run under Shariah should make it clear what aspects of the dhimmi system are still being practiced