I agree that Stevietheman s suggestion is the most appropriate to implement JHP if you re talking about the 14 54 27 June 2007 24 209 30 113 edit 141014976 entry that I reverted it is because the content was taken directly from the Incidents page without any regard for either a including the references themselves or b not following the WP BLP policy that was taking place over on that page regarding this specific incident If you re talking about the 22 32 2 July 2007 Realkyhick edit 142152748 entry that I reverted it s because the entry contained information that was already outdated by information that was updated in the Incidents page and the link to the Incidents page was also removed by Realkyhick at that time If you re talking about your edit 147620955 from the 29th that was just a copy of the same info from the Incidents page poorly included and badly placed in the article while we all agree that there should be some mention of the incident including it in the intro section isn t really appropriate either especially as it in essence duplicated information that was posted further down the page Yes I know that you ll disagree with the in essence part but go with me on the concept As for an official WP policy there are guidelines listed in the help section on what makes a good article I like to think that the Incidents articles fall under WP BETTER Articles covering subtopics