Demand for too many sources Some people have demanded way more sources than are necessary for this article For example the request for a secondary source for the fact that The Inquirer has criticized the publication of EG s real name This is utter rubbish From WP NOR An article or section of an article that relies on a primary source should 1 only make descriptive claims the accuracy of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable educated person without specialist knowledge and 2 make no analytic synthetic interpretive explanatory or evaluative claims The section in question states The Inquirer has criticized this deletion 8 as well as the revelation of the model s real name during the deletion discussions by Wikipedia users the model s name and identity had been kept confidential by The Inquirer 9 We comply with 1 the claim is only descriptive it reproduces what the Inq stated in their article and is EASILY verifiable The information is also not interpreted thus we also comply with 2 As such I m removing the redundant second source Further I recently added a citation for Mike Magee s quote from BusinessWeek Again I am removing this The quote appears in the earlier reference to the same BusinessWeek article and citations are allowed to span multiple sentences