Now both Jayron32 and Fram are having memory lapses about how they did what they did we are lucky to have diffs that can t lie Fram s deletion conceals both my page and its history that he uses to count the contributions Fram says that the contribution by Baseball Bugs that Fram also deleted was minor Is that supposed to mean unworthy When Baseball Bugs posts to my page and the post is sensible as it was then no third person may delete it But to Jayron32 and Fram BB s post is merely collateral damage Access to my deleted page which I have asked for and been denied will reveal that I was interrupted in the process of scanning the Ref Desk archive Anyone can do that because it s publically accessible I became a humble recipient of The Reference Desk Barnstar scroll up to see it when I showed objective results The first result showed Jayron32 s contribution of references at RD M to be among the highest which likely gave Jayron32 satisfaction That is understandable but I and many others cautioned that the measurement does not assess the quality of answers The software I use may be improved but it would lose all credibility of objectivity if I allowed it to be biassed by anyone s feeling of being flattered or attacked by its output Fram if you want AGF then stop hiding the page you deleted and it will be seen to be not just about Jayron32 it doesn t even contain the word mistake and it has a portion still under construction An aside to Franamax if you can not write better things than On it s face the page was designed solely to disparage other editors then it would be nicer not to see your posts at all