Are you bored or what Please read the text and the irritation source text carefully on the nonsense you have replaced on my talk page You have reposted this notice from another editor without any basis similar the original editor making the notice unwarranted and complete nonsense Hundreds of lines of discussion on the talk page were in progress and a consensus was reached to include the edits I did The original reverter obviously had not read any of the history used a nonsense POV excuse and labelled it Reverted good faith edits by 99 251 114 120 talk His previous edit was four minutes prior so it was obvious no research was performed Next some obviously ignorant of the situation person decided to post a warning on my webpage based on a POV assumption I removed it labelled it just as it was nonsense Please stay off my talk page with this nonsense Comments and valid warnings are completely welcome anytime Apparently I will have to take this up on the talk page of the originator of this nonsense or a flock of meatpuppets will be visiting me again Here is what you reverted in case you didn t read it previously April 2012 Your recent editing history at Centrifugal force shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing especially if you violate the three revert rule which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24 hour period Undoing another editor s work whether in whole or in part whether involving the same or different material each time counts as a revert Also keep in mind that while violating the three revert rule often leads to a block you can still be blocked for edit warring even if you don t violate the three revert rule should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly To avoid being blocked instead of reverting please consider using the article s talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution In some cases you may wish to request temporary page protection Apparently I will have to take this up on the talk page of the originator of this nonsense or a flock of meatpuppets will be visiting me again 99 251 114 120