The lies that go unpunished by the Wikipedia cult insiders to protect the integrity of the cult In no particular order Telling someone they lied is a personal attack Explaining precisely how someone lied is not civil BLPCRIME says don t put the news of Gerry Adams arrest on the front page BLP protects people from defamation by not putting on the front page what is already in the biography The news reporting Adams arrest was tabloid in nature Consensus is about who can tell the best lie and get away with it Consensus is about counting up who said yes who said no and declaring the winner No consensus is what you get when one side lies to counter another sides truths The UK polce only arrest you to protect your rights In the UK being arrested is a minor procedural matter of no significance Gerry Adams might not have been arrested for ordering a murder There is no appealing of closures on Wikipedia Anything Rambling Man has ever said is saying now or will say in the future Filing a complaint about any of the above in any forum at any time is beating a dead horse Even the first complaint Expecting civility is all about examining what the other guy said and has nothing at all to do with your behaviour even if it was patronising dismissive sarcastic arrogant or just downright rude