Addressing I d just call this section Opinion or Decision and toss of the court JMO I won t kick if you want to keep it per WP SCOTUS SG Boomer Photos of Souter and Rehnquist are sandwiching the text which I hear is the worst wiki crime you can possibly commit snark Maybe right justify Souter and bump Rehnquist down to the dissent section and left justify his image per WP SCOTUS SG Boomer and you should expand the dissent a bit too it s sketchy I m going to read the actual decision before I comment further on this section but while you are doing a copyedit remember to either expand or merge your one sentence paragraphs But until then IMHO consider that the GA should perhaps be longer than the syllabus of the case itself Just saying Consider expanding the Subsequent developments subsection into a full section and discuss the impact of the case