As a typical example of the damage to which this non collaborative editor Jonathan is willing to do to push his views see this statement he recently back put in Ramana Maharshi s teachings have been further popularised sic in the west as neo Advaita via H W L Poonja and his students sfn lucas 2011 p 94 That is of course total opinion that neo Advaita conforms accurately to Ramana s teachings since Ramana even had a problematic relationship with traditional Advaita and it is a claim widely disputed as well as conflicting with the rest of the article A close reading of Ramana s words in context shows little evidence that would support such a claim at best Poonja himself dismissed the neo Advaitan s claims of enlightenment in an interview with David Godman We need an end to iron handed editing by fiat and genuine consensus building Which will require reigning in this rogue editor