1 Ref 5 is handled it no longer exists on the SpaceX site as far as I can tell so I pulled from Archive org Performed lots of other citation fixes including fixing a couple of URLs that were incorrect I also agree that the forum cite should be removed if a replacement can not be located the material needs to be excised In my opinion all the newspacewatch com articles should be replaced since they ve gone completely paywall I ll be surprised if they survive even though I ve added archive links to all four of those cites 2 I ll come back and clean up various conversion issues definitely SI before non SI in space related articles but I didn t immediately see much in the way of spelling issues There s some formatting work to be done but doesn t seem too bad 3 As for images they simply don t exist at this point in time SpaceX is after all a private company and conducts their testing in house I m always keeping an eye out for them but I don t expect anything until this version of the rocket is used for a NASA mission However lack of media should not disqualify the article from any status even as Featured Article I recall one last year that was passed without free media Editors can not be held responsible in situations like this 4 I agree that rocket could be dropped from the title as redundant Or use something like SpaceX reusable rocket program Eh t c