As I said initially when I began to look into this I thought that IHTS might have violated the IBAN by visiting a page that MaxBrowne had edited I went back to check whether the IBAN might restrict editors from editing the same page some IBANs do have such a provision but I saw there was no such provision Furthermore IHTS was pretty good about not addressing MaxBrowne either directly or indirectly on that page That s why my follow up comment was to declare that there was no violation and that I felt that IHTS didn t go there just because of MaxBrowne and did so only because of his interest in chess matters And if I d concluded there was stalking I would definitely have noted that both at ANI and on IHTS s user talk page Look again at my comment at ANI where I told MaxBrowne So I thought I made it clear that this wasn t a stalking incident again I thought IHTS was only there because he edits chess articles and areas related to chess and there was no IBAN violation he did a very good job of restraining himself from commenting to or about MaxBrowne on that page