No attack A question about the preceding polarized pattern of voting and appended comments using metaphor and a suggestion to consider policy and practice Your notion of what constitutes attack is interesting Asking is not accusing it is a way of more politely requesting consideration of a new perception than a statement Original research within our debate pages is healthy Humour can help move a frozen debate toward consensus Have you considered that your deletion of comments from other editors that you dislike on a page where you have previously expressed a vehement opinion on one side of a polarized debate may constitute a conflict of interest Are you Sheriff John Brown Am I Bob Marley another metaphor I am glad that debate brings you merriment and keeps Qwyrxian involved Also why are you going around describing me as an inactive editor as you did here Talk Stalk