2005 Hello Ben May I start by noting that you have not attended to a single point I have made but merely made unfounded protestations without any factual evidence to back them please write all sources and proof if you have a factual point to make These reverts to the long standing article were not my writings they were edits back to a well accepted compromise a fact you surreptitiously ignore and the main text has been in an approved state for months now Two separate administrators are happily with its compromise from both sides but you appear to think you can smash in here like a bull in a china store and rearrange the whole lot based on your own religious biases and PR campaigns for the Watchtower org As I kindly pointed out Ben please read all the talk pages yes all 14 of them before you do any more vandalizing and make casual unfounded accusations These subjects have been debated many times and a common compromise was reached months ago which you appear clearly not interested in Your selfishness in trying to destroy the hard work of others and their extensive debates on these matters is quite typical of many with your religious background the blinkered view that any method is acceptable if it makes the JWs look good in the public eye Censorship is not welcome here especially when it has a blatant religious agenda and bias You have failed to make a single point of valid criticism that has not been discussed at great length before please go and read all 14 pages of talk as you might start to understand why you are being so unreasonable and astoundingly narrow minded Wikipedia is here for factual information not public relation promotions for religious sects if you want that then go to the Watchtower s website If you have a specific point with referenced proof and backup then bring it here and discuss it but please check it has not already been done before and please don t come out with more nebulous vague accusation with no specific point or proof If you have facts you feel are incorrect then produce your documented proof with references then it can be discussed here in a mature way before any possible changes are made Your current behaviour is highly offensive to all editors and contributors to Wikipedia Regards 20th of September 2005