Well yes it is repetitive but that s because some statements are not addressed In such discussions one should speak about the facts not about the individuals but one should also listen No I don t want to include the actor model in GR as you say I have said this at least 3 times Yes Hewitt sounds cranky at times but as far as the category itself he s got a point My only comment was that the category relativistic information science is meaningful see my comments above Whether you or anybody else in GR doesn t like it that s another matter The category is called relativistic information science not GR information science The only other person on WP who asked me about my credentials was a crank on a rather infamous discussion on Bell s theorem For whatever it s worth to you I have a not recent PhD from Harvard I do research in quantum information although I am pretty knowledgeable in PDE s and C algebras of course without authentication there is no way to prove this so this somewhat pointless Do you seriously think that I would be participating in this discussion if I didn t know about the difference between GR and SR Anyway this irrelevant since arguments should stand on their own