Yes I did if Wikipedia can not be trusted with something as simple as quite literally 1 2 3 then it has a very serious problem and the slashdot article happened to be just about this I do not give importance to a comment receiving a high or low rating on slashdot as that can too often be just a measure of the biases of some modders I think I have abided by wikipedia policies that content must be based on verifiable sources and the others who caused me much inconvenience haven t Wikipedia is a public resource and I see no reason why I should shy from making this issue public when it s ontopic on another site and a poignant example of a problem