You should look up the definition of vansalism that you quote You will see that an honest attempt to improve an article by including true but controversial statements does not constitute vandalism In fact your revert of my edit on strategy is far closer to vandalism The coaching staff has made it painfully clear to even the casual observer that cheating is part of their strategy As for the edit to the discussion of the Pat s article isn t that the purpose of the discussion If you don t address the continual cheating by the Pats then you are not being honest and complete and are not following the Wikipedia rules I ll look up the exact reference if you want 71 99 139 118