Very clever Creutzfeldt though to first hold forth with strong opinions on something you quite evidently knew absolutely nothing about and then after a cursory skim to blather your opinions for a lot longer seems out of character for a supposed expert in mathematical logic a claim of yours I find very dubious not to mention someone trained by the Jesuits I hope you re seeing a counselor Moreover you can t even apply your logic consistently Apparently it seems quite reasonable for a 9 11 Conspiracies encyclopedia page to discuss at length claims about a remote controlled rocket having hit the Pentagon and other unlikely scenarios for which there is a complete absence of evidence than for this espionage puzzle for which there is some evidence and an interesting flurry of mainstream media attention but not yet enough evidence for a firm judgement It would be good someday to have a proper explanation about the Israeli art students mystery and not just your peremptory and prejudiced dismissal of it as fucking bollocks I guess the Jesuits trained you in that particular science In short as I have said elsewhere get over yourself This overweening weenie ness of yours is unseemly as well as wilfully stupid Practice your multiplication tables keep up with your super duper secret crypto code book work hard and someday you will grow to be a man Perhaps the hardware store will have a job for you Anyway I don t really care what you think and I m not even a zealous or crazed proponent of the art students theories I just thought that it was something interesting to consider in the 9 11 context something requiring clarification something that merits at the least a bit of consideration It pisses me off though when know it all knuckleheads like you arrogate to themselves the right to decide the difference between heresy and blasphemy Maybe you should go back to the Jesuits for further training