Sorry about the link it works with www so Obviously a state can not be both sovereign and be ruled by a foreign individual appointed by foreign sovereigns Check out that link Mr Inzko can overturn any decision made by anyone or any office in the country including Constitutional Court Presidency and Parliament So the second criterion for inclusion in the list is not satisfied as he clearly does have supreme power over the entire territory He doesn t have to say The country I rule is not sovereign this is obvious from the very existence of his office I m not making any conclusion of or on my own as there is nothing to analyze and thus nothing to synthesize either Those are simply the facts of the matter and common knowledge Links to third party sources to tell you the obvious are not needed obviously Another important link here is No independent source has to call the sky blue either To me it s those who included this country in the list of sovereign states that clearly do have their own political agenda in all this Don t blame the messenger I just tell how it is CIA is highly unreliable as a source they have been caught editing Wikipedia with false information just Google it Again I can not imagine a more reliable source than the existence of the first link above the governor s office