Er isn t that exactly what I did with my previous version I tried to reach a compromise between versions from weeks and months ago which I thought were quite satisfactory and the current one with its new tidbits of information like the Dianetics link What about the version I proposed is lower in quality than the one from months ago Anyway since there doesn t seem to be any support at all for Nescio s version and it clearly is inconsistent with the rest of the opening and heavily redundant and POVed I ll revert it to the previous version for now to continue discussing it s hard to get an idea of the new version when two of the paragraphs are changed forwards and the other is changed backwards