So you think being rude in an edit summary is something you need to leave messages about but reverting productive work without explanation is something you can happily ignore Seems to me that s a very warped perspective and implicitly condones what you claim not to condone If you believe that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and if you want it to get better you should rethink your priorities Sure criticise my rude edit summaries if you like but to simply ignore destructive edits like User EncMstr s is not helpful to anyone If Wikipedia is going to declare itself the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit then anonymous editors should not be discriminated against In practice they are by you and many many others The solution to that is not for me or anyone else to create accounts but for those who actively discriminate to stop doing so At least you ve taken the time to have a civil discussion That courtesy is frequently not given From another IP address a couple of months ago I wrote an entire article of I think very high quality lengthy well referenced comprehensive etc etc and then got blocked after someone reverted something I did with no explanation and I reverted back No one said a word about the article I wrote all I got in return was a bunch of snotty templates and a block for trying to reinstate good work Things like that make me pretty contemptuous of the culture here and I am very unlikely to start assuming good faith when bad faith is constantly assumed of me simply because I don t have a username 190 161 134 66