July 2005 UTC Your assumptions as to my intentions are incorrect I am not motivated to convince you of anything I am not motivated to include any specific example As I ve stated quite clearly and my actions verify I am here to create an NPOV definition of terrorism You can help those of us who are trying to resolve the NPOV dispute by suggesting wording that does not create a primary or secondary source Your entire introduction is a historic generalization which would be considered a secondary source if it were based on axioms or primary sources Even if the creation of secondary sources were allowed in Wikipedia which it is not I can t find any credible evidence to support the assertions you derive If you are honestly trying to promote an objective introduction for terrorism I suggest that you help us start from the beginning and add descriptions that can be cited or that are at least generally accepted by other editors 18 30 23