unless you can point to a policy that says Major contributions is inherently POV then your crusade is ignorable The man changed economics mathematics computers evolutionary biology business war politics and diplomacy with a few brief papers several reliable sources which can and will be used to interpret his works establish that That with the spectre of understatement is a major contribution to those fields and the twentieth century Until you establish it s inherent bias and a relevant policy interpretation held by the wider consensus of Wikipedia users you re opinion is just an opinion and an ill informed one