24 August 2007 UTC There is no WP RS to affirm the veracity of DI s doubtful claim either That is you have no WP RS either way Therefore it is not a verifiable fact that Picard or any of the other 103 original signers consented to or agreed with the DI s published interpretation or political position vis a vis PBS or any other subsequent political purpose regarding what should or shouldn t be taught in school All you have on verifiable record is that the 103 original signers called for skeptical examination of the evidence for scientific theories DI s unverifiable claim which fraudulently spins that into consensual agreement or support for their interpretation or political agenda is not a fact under the rules of Wikipedia All the rest of DI s propaganda is utter hogwash fraudulently perpetrated by the DI without the verifiably demonstrated consent of the original 103 individuals In view of the WP BLP Do No Harm clause the unverified claim of the DI must not be promoted to fact and any content to that effect must be immediately expunged per the WP BLP 16 11