who presumably wrote the unsigned message above No and I can understand that questioning your content additions or changes can be annoying I ll do less of that in the future But that doesn t mean I don t have valid points and the way to deal with such annoyances isn t to make personal attacks Thanks for being civil in your above post I suggest the best way forward is for everyone to worry less about minutia and focus more on adding cited content to the page I don t think that the article is complete by any means and there really is a lot of news articles about Bitcoin By now there s probably also a much deeper pool of academic research