March 2013 UTC Well it is clear that my position on what is proper to cover in this article does not fit with the vocal majority here I maintain that the article in its current form reads like a sanitized Vatican press release Even if all of the arguments I ve presented here are seen to carry no weight I fail to see how the wealth of reliable sources that I ve sited have been so readily dismissed as irrelevant giving not so much as a single mention within the body of the article And aside from the one s I had highlighted there were plenty of reliable sources reporting on the December VatiLeaks Dossier with that document s connection to the resignation decision I find it shocking to see so many editors here to not want a single mention of any of that So the decision for now is to continue presenting an article on Benedict s resignation as though there was absolutely no connection to any of the scandals and to pretend that all of the reliable sources that do point to such connections don t exist Very curious 15 20 7