Journal of Creation which are peer reviewed by the scientific community and by active working biologists paelentologists geologists researchers and so on You made me laugh with this Thanks for that Sorry you have been lied too From the moment it came out that journal has had criticism not only on its con tense but also on the authors and their so called Peer review It has zero credentials in the scientific community and is not a reliable source Never will be Secondly please read this page and the main evolution page Then read the archive talk pages of evolution If you still then think evolution has not been observed and have a valid criticism that could be backed up be reliable resources Like a real scientific paper Then get back to us As at the moment not to be crass you seem quite ignorant about evolution and even the social controversy that is mostly prominent only in America