restored text that was deleted NEWBERRY YOU HAVE TO BE CAREFUL OF USER 24 HERE IS THE TEXT THAT USER 24 DELETED Ahhhh I see that Wigdor er I mean User 24 168 66 27 is trying to worm his way back into this surrealism article again Stirling you might want to check the logs to see how Wigdor was previously removed from the article Wigdor is nothing but an emerging artist who thinks he s the next Salvador Dali Keith er I mean User 24 168 66 27 I have my messages saved as text in a separate file so if you delete my posts then I will simply reinsert them You can t bury the truth 16 51 13 Jan 2005 UTC User 24 168 66 27 Please don t delete my posts That is very rude The following was deleted by user 24 168 66 27 this morning Why would he delete this post I wonder If anyone is curious in the interests of creating a NPOV article about surrealism it should be noticed that both user 63 169 104 2 and user 24 168 66 27 were the main users interested in pushing the Keith Wigdor article forward If you have any doubts then check the discussion page for that article It wasn t long ago that all references to Keith Wigdor were removed from this surrealism article This removal occured because of Wigdor s total unimportance to the surrealist movement for the simple reason that Keith Wigdor is at best an emerging digital artist who fancies himself as a being a surrealist and who has many times attempted to pose as a surrealist Needless to say many of the english speaking surrealist groups listed on this page know about him and refuse to have anything to do with him Keith Wigdor appears again and again to disrupt all things genuinely surrealist It is also interesting to note if you check the discussion archives of this surrealism article that these same 2 users were also involved with promoting Keith Wigdor as a surrealist in this very article Also if you look at some of the recent belligerent trollish thike ish posts of these 2 users it shouldn t be unreasonable to suspect that perhaps both of these 2 IP numbers are being used by Keith Wigdor For the 2 no name users mentioned here who are strongly associated with or strongly correlated with the antics of Keith Wigdor it is difficult to imagine that their efforts in building this wiki article will be anything but disruptive and manipulative in the long run Please treat these 2 users with extreme caution for they are one and the same and also happen to be Keith Wigdor who is playing a sock puppet game 22 10 11 Jan 2005 UTC