I am not a lawyer and I am not interested in becoming one just so I can post on Wikipedia so I am not going to spend any more time building up a case It is my understanding that Wikipedia administrators have an active interest in enforcing the rules and not depend on self appointed legal deputies to do their work for them There s positive evidence that I am not the same person as these two so I see no reason why I should pretend to have the burden of proof in this matter Based on this I feel sufficient cause for the removal of all claims of sock puppetry If they try to edit war with me I will revert as often as needed since this is a matter of libel and vandalism