Heres the talkpage discussion that Jehocman has blocked me for Hi Collect I know you are a very considerate NPOV editor in regard to content additions in regard to BLP articles Recently I have started to notice quite a few editors opposing any BLP considerations Policy is quite strong from the foundation and Arbcom in regard to BLP and if this is not filtering through it may be necessary to return to Arbcom for further clarification as your involved in many of the discussions would you please log and keep an eye out for users that repeatedly oppose BLP considerations and for discussions that from your neutral BLP considerate position resulted in a POV support consensus Youreallycan User Will Beback has joined in and User Coffeepusher has also reverted YGM Youreallycan Is there a problem Does a sentence on his most famous law case actually violate BLP Will Beback talk You are well aware of the good faith NPOV concerns that your desired addition as focusing unduly on one project in four years work is in violation of WP UNDUE User Coffeepusher has now two reverts and is edit warring the disputed content into the BLP Youreallycan Huh Working on Wikipedia for four sic years is UNDUE That s a very strange theory I am well aware that you don t like me and that you and Collect follow me around Wikipedia opposing perfectly good edits Will Beback talk Not you read before you comment please You see your own bigotry I have no idea about you at all No one is following you around you attract investigation through your contributions Youreallycan Now you re accusing me of bigotry Whew Will Beback talk From an NPOV position I am disturbed by your contributions and have already pointed that out to you I urge you moving forward take a more BLP considerate NPOV position through your contributions Youreallycan I honor and obey all of the Wikipedia policies Please don t call me a bigot I consider that to be a personal attack Will Beback talk I am disturbed by your contributions and have already pointed that out to you I urge you moving forward take a more BLP considerate NPOV position through your contributions Your wiki lawyering claims of attack are just a meaningless distraction from reality Youreallycan My position on strong observance of the letter and spirit of WP BLP should be pretty much clear Collect talk