Cool name 03 43 16 Mar 2005 UTC I ll second that BTW thanks for the good edit on programming errors About those subheadings Regarding the change on Political spectrum It says that tags can be used to keep items out of the table of contents You re right here that they should be in the table I had been used to using them alot for repetitive elements on another project But I thought I would mention it Scientology Good job on that NPOV rephrasing of the Helena Krobin section of Scientology Talk Sockpuppet Hi there You said the sockpuppet proposal could be reworded please tell us how you d like to reword it thanks adiant 11 25 May 13 2005 UTC Wikipedia Sock puppet Proposal Hi there I ve reworded this a bit per everyone s comment and would like to get support to make this a guideline and allow it to be used Could you please indicate if you agree If you want a rewording please be bold Thanks adiant 12 30 May 19 2005 UTC Woods Hole Thanks for taking care of that I couldn t get to it when I noticed it today Good work 04 08 10 Jun 2005 UTC Chlorophobia I found sources that it is a phobia however the info inside I could not source It would be a better vfd candidate I don t have time to list it now however Sorry 30 June 2005 20 54 UTC Christianity You are funny I see that I wish it didn t have to be at the expense of others me in this case 9 July 2005 06 15 UTC Unusual spellings are funny It s not meant personally 9 July 2005 06 34 UTC It s not really that unusual Template locations I have noticed you discussed template locations at Wikipedia talk template messages One user has unilaterally been moving templates from articles to talk pages en masse over 100 articles are affected during a spate made by the user last night I have spent some time trying to resolve this issue There is now a poll discussing where templates belong created at Wikipedia Template locations and a discussion at Template talk Expansion Wikipedia Template locations Hi you voted for the AID template to be on the talk page Is there a specific reason why you discriminate against this project as compared to the almost identical COTW If you would like to insist on the AID template having specific different rules than the others please tell us on the Wikipedia talk Template locations Spyware png regarding your reversion of our edit to the the spyware page Sorry if we didn t follow protocol Is one expected to actually edit the graphic and or correct the caption May I trust that you are editing the graphic to correct the information Thanks I edited the caption yes I appreciate you editing the caption I see that it now says Spyware and other toolbars I work on a team that is working on the Desktop com toolbar that is included in the graphic Would you not agree that the inclusion of our toolbar in the image that is displayed on the Spyware page impliesat the very leastthat our toolbar is Spyware Our toolbar does nothing without the express permission of the user as spelled out in the EULA We don t want an image of it included in an image meant to illustrate Spyware Does that make sense Thanks for your consideration Respectfully I understand your concern and I agree that we should be careful not to imply that all of these toolbars are spyware I can imagine that it s a particularly pointed issue in your case since the Desktop com toolbar is at the top of the image I can t speak to the specifics of your product after all Gator and WhenU also claim that their prog