El Nino The limited and perhaps maladroit changes I ve made in the first bit of the article ignoring please my snide comment you may give a sense of where jargon might impede readability of the article However could be a case in which if you have to ask then maybe you can t help or maybe you can I ve added article to watch list for the moment and may try to marginally contribute I don t pretend to understand subject with slightest depth and would be cautious The larger problem is in its organization A general reader wants to know immediately what are the potential consequences of El Nino Instead the article s lead grafs launch into a long winded and seemingly vague description of its history and theory that are more appropriate for deep into its body