We can easily add Beck s POV perhaps quoting the link I m reading now that you added to the talk page but I disagree with your other assertions In fact I think the article as a whole gives too much credence to the minority viewpoint that Beck is a swell and stable commentator The introduction for example is one of the worst I ve read on Wikipedia and it gives absolutely no indication of who this person is and what kind of controversy surrounds him It appears that judging by the talk page comments a small number of editors are enforcing this minority viewpoint on the article through persistence But I am new to the page as you know and this is just my initial impression so feel free to educate me or otherwise disagree