I have reviewed the changes by user Bueller and I would just like to say I agree with his assessment This article is becoming a hobby horse upon which to hang any negative quote article or opinion piece on Feith is being dredged up and tacked on Its extremely unencyclopedic In my opinion the article should stick to historical facts that are manifestly true such as the fact he served in the Bush administration under which bureau some of his acts and accomplishments there etc All this subterfuge smacks of character assassination by editors out to paint this man in a negative fashion You can dig up negative articles on nearly any public figure that doesn t make them encyclopedic nor scholarly