No it doesn t It misrepresents the source material on multiple levels Some of those colleagues take issue It says it infuruates his former collegeages Heated Now here s your POV exposed You re going to characterize the tone of Lopez s comments And what s with the use of legalese Testimony Attested What courtroom are we talking about here not acceepted by the majority of his colleagues It says that his theories are absolutely ludicrous This is a perfect example of trying to neutralize the source rather than being neutral The current text neutrally presents the actual source material in an accurate manner Your version does not