My Reverting of The Edit In The History Section I didn t revert the edit because the material you removed isn t redundant in some ways which is fairly obvious if you read the section as a whole The entire history section of this article is still in very bad shape in my opinion I d suggest that its got non NPOV issues in several spots the tone it s written in and choice of words seem somewhat chatty and unencyclopedic to me and worst of all it continues to contain what I d argue are historical inaccuracies in some places Instead of editing out the paragraph that was removed today which contained a link to a map as well as an internal link to the ongoing Caledonia land dispute a subject quite relevant in the Grand Valley these days I d like to see the entire history section itself brought up to a higher standard In my opinion from a historical perspective the article itself would benefit more if some of the earlier comments in it regarding the acquisition of the land by the Six Nations were edited out and replaced by the material that was removed today As I said back in August I m willing to work on this article myself as time allows but in my opinion it doesn t make sense removing content that s not only relevant and contains references it s actually of a higher quality than what remains