You bet I indeed am frustrated disappointed or should I disheartened and disgusted Not because of the block though It s because of the spiteful hateful and downright vindictive behaviour some people have in wikipedia and with profound connivance of some administrators even Mihaiam is a sock of Edward321 just look at their contributions for past 24 hours Why should I be involved be anymore editing although I really want to when I know that some daft hater may simply revert ALL of them without caring much about silly things like justification or consequence and I will be blocked as a result I shouldn t be involved Wikipedia like any other bureaucracy is ruled by bullies including some administrators However the real bureaucracies do give you a chance to settle the dispute in court or police station And at least you can afford to not be so helpless about it Here my edits were labelled as propaganda implying that I m a propagandist after all my edits were rashly reverted although they had the chance to simply modify inaccuracies with good sources they chose to delete the whole section nothing was done and because nothing was done the reversion of my edits only accelerated now if not all most of my edits are entirely reverted Then that genius John wrote on my talk page I m edit warring I usually specifically mention no edit war intended after my edit in description My friggin edits are getting reverted and I m the one he deemed to be the edit warrior Come on now will you You don t want to help me Frankly I don t know what you want Have a beautiful time here at the wikipedia Humanity is withering away much faster here at the wikipedia than in the real world The real world is sick in my view But in comparison to the demented arrangement here at wikipediaBecause here it every time sometimes gratuitously comes down to majority of consensus no matter how ignorant and or prejudiced and or oblivious the involved editors are about the topic at hand their views still count That s not a very efficient way that is rather a crazy medieval way of discerning what s reliable and what s not And thus implies that minority is always wrong and majority is always correct That s fundamentally incorrect real world seems like a much better place to dwellAlthough I concede that some few of my sources too were questionable and faced justified skepticism I don t think that it necessitated a whole reversion Slight modifications would have worked just fine Thank God science doesn t progress like that in real world Talk Note