Hi the new section title sounds good to me but I m still in favor of removing the Charles Taylor quote It makes Mr Taylor appear like a living legend which perhaps he is but it s odd that he s not referred to in such glowing terms on his own Wikipedia article or maybe not it s a very contentious statement from a periodical not a person The second part of the quote seems like empty praise to me not really encyclopedia grade material Neither part passes the sniff test so I removed it again Also from your comment it appears that you think the article is unbalanced because positive material is not being included Is that what you think that there is not enough positive material about Mr Wilber in the article I thought the whole goal was NPOV neither positive nor negative just the facts It s not supposed to sound like an ad nor like an attack piece and to that end both this quote and negative quotes like Mr Wilber is full of himself will get stricken