pile of cn tags on the article An editor added a pile of cn tags to the article As far as I ve noticed the facts tagged are well known and can be supported by references in time Some of the facts should indeed have attribution such as According to Khalifa and I have the books buried somewhere in this apartment Let s look at the current tagged text I ll start a subsection for each using computers in 1968 Starting in 1968 Khalifa used computers to analyze the frequency of letters and words in the Qur an 1974 claim of numerical pattern In 1974 he claimed that he discovered an intricate numerical pattern in the text of the Qur an involving the number 19 mentioned in verse 30 of chapter 74 of the Qur an This may be inaccurate his original work on numeric pattern did not connect pattern to 30 74 but I ll check What we may be seeing here is later synthesis Details of claim The details of this analysis including tables are available in the back of his book Quran the Final Testament 2 This was not tagged but needs attention anyway The details shifted over the years and what was published in the Final Testament is quite different from the earlier publications So it is not this analysis i e the 1974 analysis Many popular magazines and newspapers Many popular magazines and newspapers which in the Muslim world reported his discoveries This doesn t need two tags I ll pull the first Other magazine and newspaper articles Many other magazines and newspaper articles by and about Khalifa appeared throughout the world in many languages This is redundant I ll yank it Many Muslim organizations Various Muslim organisations however have criticised Dr Rashad s studies citation needed accusing him of spreading heresy and ignorance through his proclamation of himself as a prophet Doesn t need two tags and it s WP WEASEL Definitely we need specifics I ll yank one tag