BracketBot Seaotter6 User A930913 User Dru of I d User Legoktm User Bgwhite I appreciate the computer s catching three syntax errors in the article These have been around several years but it is good to know about them They occur in the lists of personnel at 1st Aero their job descriptions showing now jobs were defined and allocated to different ranks and the courses offered as training in the development of the squadron s activities for the first formative years However a few days ago I had occasion to look at the article and saw that last year someone had removed all this detailed personnel information except for the list of Squadron Commanders I restored this information recently but it has again been removed with the comment by BB PB grossly excessive level of detail none of these people are notable It is a matter of opinion whether as trackers of man made satellite people who have done things that have never before been done in human history are or are not notable Is there any way to appeal this decision on the grounds that the listing provides useful historical detail not available elsewhere about the organizational progress of early satellite tracking in the US My Ph D is in Management Theory so I think this is worthwhile information that should not be suppressed I removed the list of Commanders as that is trivial compared to the other information and inserted this remark The historical development of the Squadron is shown by detailed listings of personnel with dates and citations However a Wikipedia monitor refuses to allow this level of detail Copies of the information are available on request from the author The list of commanders has again been restored repacing my comment and I have removed it as they are not notable it is the workers who did something special But the commanders are again restored If an appeal is permitted please tell me how to do that seaotter6 aol com