16 March 2014 UTC I just now removed the other two unbalanced tags for the Kleck and Lott sections I don t see any articulation of how they re biased other than you saying sections on flawed studies That s simply not sufficient If your argument is that no mention needs to be made of those studies because at all I strongly doubt others will agree that would result in a balanced article Perhaps I misunderstand your objections though I do not like the rearrangement of the article into specific sections for each researcher I think that may be some of your objection I would recommend reverting back to the earlier organization where it was organized by issue and not researcher Organizing by researcher allows for the problems you re concerned about That said I do not see any bias in those sections for those researchers Hemenway s research is cited as a rebuttal in the opening paragraph of the first paragraph and not long after in the next 20 17