I am amazed that there could have been such a major exercise over this extremely modest article which conained nothing contentious or manufatured There was a good set of source material given for such a minor article in fact more than I have seen on countless other articles where often there are none at all Looking back to when I created the article observers will see that I only attributed actual quotes to two writers I cited Anderson as my source for much of the article but I did not actually quote him although I lifted much from him My edition is the revised 1867 9 volume set But there are many editions of this work I have seen editions as late as the 1890s and condensed into two big volumes A glance at ABE Books will give some idea of the number of editions available