you are very much on the right track now A few things you ll want to adjust If you have more sources that are also strong especially ones that talk a little more about her overall career rather than just her books that would help flesh out the depiction of her When you have a list of items like works or links make sure to bullet each item using a just like I m doing here And you needn t leave blank lines between list items when you bullet Carefully skim through and remove anything that is even slightly subjective praise that s not directly sourced to a review commentator That is if the NYT says she s splendiferous you can mention that mention NYT said it and cite it But you absolutely can not refer to her as renowned pathbreaking stellar imaginative etc in Wikipedia s own voice This would likely pass just as it is but there s no harm and much benefit to continuing to beef it up a little Also if her birth year is public record i e mentioned on some university site news article etc not by digging in city archives then please include that next to her name Nice work I think you re really getting the hang of this now I like to avoid reviewing the same article multiple times when it s this close to passing so I ll wait until another reviewer puts fresh eyes on it