December 2009 UTC Now there s typical AGW alarmist Watermelon argumentum ad hominem content vacant suppressive authoritarian WikiNazi rottenness if ever it got posted online Don t address Monckton s or Nsaa s position but strive with utter ineffectiveness I might add to fault the source as such You ve got nothing to back yourself up do you Nothing at all Objectivity and consensus and impartiality indeed Just good old Wiki bloody pedia to use Mr Monckton s ever so apt characterization as usual 71 125 130 14 14 44 22