Is this stuff from the EPA getting much media play I m concerned that although the source is reliable and the material is relevant and interesting including noting that this whole affair was a manufactured controversy it s really a primary source without much mainstream media coverage There are a few secondary sources writing about the EPA s release but not the sort of level I would describe as significant It could certainly be used as a reference for other stuff like the aforementioned manufactured controversy stolen emails etc but I don t know if it s worth an addition in itself