Wikipedia BRD In your future dealings with editors on articles please be aware of the above policy that says you should discuss any changes after your bold change has been reverted on the article talk page In other words You being bold which is great Me Reverting because unless they are resurrected by magic zombies are not paranormal creatures in the traditional sense You should of Discussed Please bear this in mind in future This is so that you can fully justify your reasoning behind the changes and are not caught up in pointless edit wars going back and forth and then you yourself can not be accused of edit warring Look forward to working with you I have read other rules where they say if it is done multiple times then be discussed And I have seen several main editors who I m sure you would know if named who dodn t follow BRD at all And I wasn t going to discuss my edit on Warm Bodies the second time round because I put it back with sources I found for it If you weren t happy with that then I would have discussed it But as you seem happy with it now as you haven t reverted it then there isn t any problem Just because they don t doesn t mean you shouldn t Old saying do as I say not as I do comes to mind In other words do as Wikipedia says not as other editors do and you can t really go wrong It s not a case of being happy with it I just don t want to edit war over it I do not believe that it is classed as paranormal the lead needs sorting anyway as there are far too many genre s listed in the opening lead The idea of free will also comes to mind Like I said if it was reverted a second time I would have said why it should have been included on the talk page I m not going to waste my time I added an edit in and then later found a source for it Paranormal romance is currently the only genre there with a source As we are using our own opinions on the page you don t believe paranormal romance should be included as there are too many genres l well I personally think fantasy could go The story is focusing more on paranormal romance than it is on the fantasy it is inspired by the love story Romeo and Juliet Good idea I ll get rid of it A source isn t usually needed for every genre I will also transfer a copy of this conversation to the article talk page Just so other involved can par take Woops just realised I moved this over to my archive Meant to only move the two dormant posts That s cool I thought it was something like that so I replaced it Thor Yes I saw the film almost two weeks ago The walk and talk corridor scene where Loki shape shifts several times But we all need to cite our sources and they can t be personal viewing until after the film comes out You did cite it the second time so all s well An RfC that you may be interested in As one of the previous contributors to or as one of the commenters on it s talk page I would like to inform you that there has been a Wikipedia Requests for comments RfC