Yeah I read that again making something out of nothing is not what a scientific treatise incorporates Sunder s remarks shouldn t be taken out of context or elaborated on as if he meant more than what he stated As a scientist a really good scientist they are supposed to look at everything even if it is preposterous Same can be said about physical antropologists while they know Bigfoot does not exist many do not take the assumption that it is impossible the evidence that Bigfoot exists is so miniscule that for all practical purposes it really is not possible that he does the same aplies here and as far as I am concerned expanding on science fiction for the sake of catering to the CD crowd is not necessary