I am and thank you I m flattered by your comments but I agree that I would not be electable at this time for the reasons you noted and also because I ve had only limited involvement in RFA in recent months see some of the oppose comments here Incidentally I think some editors might oppose Mike Selinker for the latter reason as well My standard for RFBs is Has this user administrator demonstrated a consistent capacity to evaluate consensus so I d gladly support him VegaDark and or you but some editors want a record of involvement in RFAs Although I can understand the desire for evidence of familiarity with the process I personally don t prioritise familiarity with RFA as a factor More generally at this time I don t think I would be able to devote adequate time to being an active b crat Most of my time on Wikipedia is taken up by UCFD CFD and occasional participation in various other deletion discussion venues In addition I m trying to think of ways to make WikiProject Africa more active and there are also a few redlinks in the mainspace that I want to turn into bluelinks so Still I appreciate your offer of support If he is interested I would be happy to offer a co nom or support whichever he prefers The same goes for you and VegaDark Best Talk