I won t insist much here because Wikipolicy is weak It just says Secondary sources are second hand accounts at least one step removed from an event They rely for their material on primary sources often making analytic or evaluative claims about them For example a review article that analyzes research papers in a field is a secondary source for the research This publication is from 1635 in fact you should have seen that it s in a print and Guttenberg hadn t invented the press in the 15th century yet and is talking about a person who had lived two centuries before Skanderbeg died in 1468 and his father who had supposedly been in Kastoria died in the 1430s so Bardhi the author a catholic bishop wrote more than two full centuries after Still probably even the translation is wrong so I will leave this in the memory of the talk page so that a latinist might solve it Let s talk