Criticism section There are many reasons to criticize hooks ideas spelled out in work written by actual intellectuals who have engaged her work directly rather than writing scurrilous slander for feeble birdcage liner like Frontpage Magazine It turns out here that the only information in this section was inserted by a suspected sockpuppeteer and consists completely of assertions from Frontpage I would like to delete it but I don t want to be accused of removing criticism of her I think anyone who has actually read hooks or her scholarly critics might find there are a lot more useful things to put in this section than Glazov s fantasies from Horowitz s rag This article presents a far more balanced report of her 2002 commencement address to southwestern where she did not say the things Glazov claims And Reverend Alan Taylor notes that the speech was criticized because hooks dared to disturb Of course I could just insert these things in the article But do we really need this much detail about a commencement speech in 2002 I d rather just delete this section altogether until someone researches some legitimate criticism from reliable sources What do others think