Footnoted opinions in the Post calamity section I added 2 references in this section in order to source the text in some fashion They are 1 An opinion of UG 2 The global vagabond Ofcourse they represent opinions Since the section passage is about opinions on UG I felt these references were warranted If you think it wrong to include them even as footnotes please make it known I m thinking of adding a further footnote to substantiate the opinion of him as a charlatan Any suggestions Assuming this footnote is a good idea I ve looked around but it seems a lot of the negative opinions are from people with axes to grind such as Osho etc A lot of these opinions I have previously removed when part of the article body for reasons explained and I definitely do not think they belong there Thanks