To be clear has any RS established the relevance of her view other than it being a juicy soundbite to add to the case reports If that5 exists then cool we can rework the section to be decent Otherwise I think it falls under editorial discretion on who to quote and in this case it should be cut The idea to gently establish is that some people think it unlikely he has done this act I could be convinced a sentence about Conti might work if her relevance could be more solidly identified not to create a quote farm of largely irrelevant specific opinions always bad practice of the highest order Errant chat