You still misunderstand What I know or not is irrelevant What you know or not is irrelevnat All content must be cited to a reliable source WoRMS is generally considered a reliable source and occasional errors do not negate that If we had a further source contradicting it or explaining the error then we could cite that and the error would be removed No such alternative has been presented either here or on the under sourced Wikispecies page You must learn that verifiability is everything here It is one of the core content policies on which Wikipedia is founded Without that we have nothing There are no reliable sources listed here claiming that those genera don t exist and one claiming that they do We have no choice but to report that By all means publish your research on generic names in Munididae but until it s published we can t cite it