hi paul i am registered but typically don t log in pseudoanonymity is one of the pillars of wikipedia anyway names like bigdaddy777 don t really helps us much i also don t know how to indent responses on these talk pages there are many non neutral edits look at almost any revert and you ll see a case where one person thinks another is not behaving neutrally i don t really know if this section should be called controversy but her involvement with Paula Jones seems worthwhile If its too long how about a couple sentences and a link to a separate article about it you ve commented on this already but again its not reasonable to remove things that have become crufty with two years of debate especially if they re things that you might imagine yourself opposed to do to political sensibilities for instance attacks on conservatives if you re really concerned about quality of content the full archives of this article are available to peruse and sort out the most neutral truth though it would take hours off to have fun