I don t object at all I came here to bring up Capri Sun being mentioned myself It is directly after the mention of Powerade When I was skimming over the Powerade bit of the article I thought what was being conveyed was that they had transitioned some product of there s into an aluminum can much like energy drinks at packaged and this was the intended gist of the statement I didn t really think it over but now that you point it out yes that is a bit of frivolous information I d also agree with you Powerade isn t an energy drink Those are sports drinks which to my understanding and recollection by common knowledge are intended to hydrate and provide some salts to athletes A much different task than the intent of energy drinks Capri Sun is just a sugary drink with a fraction of fruit juice 10 on what I ve seen Though it could different depending on location where it s sold or what laws dictate toward the content or labeling The article on Capri Sun has a picture where the product advertises itself as 100 fruit juice Every capri sun I ve every noticed states it contains 10 It may have however amount of juice It isn t however an energy drink If Capri Sun is an energy drink then anything containing sugar or corn syrup is an energy drink The term become basically meaningless I m slightly stroking my chin as to who may be placing those products into the article but I do suppose it could be a mistake in good faith I am all for scratching them both entirely I would need to see a persuasive argument against doing so to move my postion I believe I ll be so bold as to just strike these two out Anyone finding disagreement please do post here 75 201 153 93