An editor should be careful and specific about which edits are thought to be not NPOV before reverting another editor s hard work wholesale For example what is not NPOV about stating that Candace was killed at a home in Evergreen and not in Golden Because it happens to be the geographical location of a lot of leading attachment therapists The therapists plural were not clearly unlicensed as a reliable source has stated otherwise It is POV to insist upon mistaken and misleading information be included especially when the inclusion serves no good purpose It is a settled question that a reliable source about a topic can be listed in a reading section Besides I didn t list it in the first place The reversion is to a version which is in my opinion hopelessly inaccurate biased and POV Reversions to that version should stop