2008 UTC I suppose the entire section is slightly paradoxical because it deals with the non technical use of what the article largely treats as a technical term If someone can find a peer reviewed statement about who has actually been diagnosed with MDD which might be a bit of a challenge given confidentiality laws so even a peer reviewed source would probably have to quote the people s own admission to diagnosis then that d be great but for now I ve added a footnote in order to reiterate that the section isn t necessarily asserting clinical diagnosis but rather is listing people who have been at least socially diagnosed or self diagnosed which may be what a sociocultural aspects section needs to do anyway I don t know but hopefully the section should hold water for now given the minor word changes and the footnotes 07 29 1 August