ArbCom elections are now open Hi You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve This includes the ability to impose site bans topic bans editing restrictions and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment The arbitration policy describes the Committee s roles and responsibilities in greater detail If you wish to participate you are welcome to review the candidates statements and submit your choices on the voting page For the Election committee Isu personal best scores I understand that I get most of my scores from non isu events I am aware of that I try to find the highest scores that each individual had earned And from now on if it is not under isu I will mark it under the info sheet when I create the edits Thx for understanding Have a nice day Happy New Year s Preceding unsigned comment added by 173 76 35 243 Isu bests I am so sorry I just thought whatever their highest score is matters but apparently isu doesn t care they should include non isu eventys as personal bests I wish hopefully they will do that for the future I will not make any more edits because I feel like they wo nt be adequate or right to the isu standings thx for letting me know Have a great evening Happy New Years Preceding unsigned comment added by 173 76 35 243 ISU you know what we should join together and make the isu be aware of the little events like japan open triglav trophy SC Autumn Classic Us cLASSIC ETC Unsigned comment added by 173 76 35 243 21 46 4 January 2016 isu again I forgot about people who have events with only one country representing as judges I forgot about that so that s why its not included I get it now thx for reminding me I just needed this piece of evidence thx have a nice evening Unsigned comment added by 173 76 35 243 02 42 5 January 2016 archive I only deleted them because I don t want people tracing the messages back to someone sorry about that Unsigned comment added by 173 76 35 243 04 44 6 January 2016