I d est vs Illud est On 19th October someone revised the page to change i e from the standard accepted i d est to illus est but did not update the footnote about i e vs e g leaving it stating i d est If every other site and dictionary is wrong and i e really is illud est and not i d est should there not be a note pointing this out under the entry so people realise why the definition given isn t what they expect Or is this simply a mistake illud est is valid Latin but I don t see any indication that it s the expansion of i e