I agree that this dispute should ve been handled by discussion rather than reverting And as I said several times now the other side refused to discuss it and answer my question They were the ones breaking the rules not me Regarding personal attacks the content wasn t the issue The issue was the interpretation of the rules In that case there s nothing wrong with attacking someone s interpretation of the rules It goes to the substance of the dispute Let me be clear if I haven t been already I believe that I was quite correct and innocent in my actions I don t lack for boldness If some Wikipedia administrators want to block me despite the fact that I m right they re free to do that But it doesn t make me any less right In this case the wrong side of the fence is the popular side It s certainly not the first time