The editors of the article which concerns a conservative spokesman who turned out to be a porn actor and a prostitute have altered the article to refer to the reports of his prostitution which have be definitively PROVEN as rumors even though the article s subject acknowledged his prostitution in a nationally broadcast radio program and in an article under his own name in Salon com At the same time they insured that material from an unverified interview by an evangelical ex gay blog was included When I and others pointed out that none of this is true one of the editors a hack who goes by the name Elonka replied that Wikipedia is not in the business of telling the truth That s for damn sure