Bogus argument your UNAIDS1 reference reflects my point of view yet you re reading into it your own personal bias I ve explained the key words in that document already a number of times When you re not willing to consider my points alongside your own you re rejecting my argument out of hand without consideration when your own source is read to back up my position And then When I quoted the reference directly into the page you reverted that edit claiming that it was POV or something like that Please read your own sources and see that they state that TG is not MSM but is simply considered alongside MSM Not men on the downlow wouldn t be considered alongside but rather are MSM