Response to anonymous 71 226 23 207 To repeat once again It appears your sole purpose as an editor on Wikipedia is to remove criticisms of ATF which may be considered vandalism It s difficult to consider you a serious editor when you continually hide behind different anonymous IP addresses As stated previously by other editors if you want to be considered a legitimate editor register a name and sign your posts Otherwise you may be considered only a disruptive vandal I ve given consideration to your diatribe and find your arguments specious Obviously you have an intense personal interest in extolling the virtues of ATF and your threat to bury the criticism is totally inappropriate Nevertheless I ve personally reviewed the section in question and found it to be a bit cluttered with too many incidents of ATF individual corruption which dilutes the impact Therefore at this time I won t revert your removal ATF has many good agents and employees and it does much good work However the attaboy side of the ledger seems now to be overwhelmed by the awshit side Fast and Furious being a prime example