Ivan tambuk claimed that I vandalized what wrote on the personal uion and then Rjencia says here s another disruptive account Could please take a look of this dude s writings He is inserting some severe Magyar gibberish into the history section of the Croatia article you wrote Many thanks Thanks for information We are having vandal which is trying to start edit war between hungarian and croatian users Maybe I am making mistake but earlier user name has been user Toroko Our contact with hungarian users about this question is user Hobartimus Rjecina talk edit war vandal It is You who are deleting everything Then I get accused of being some random people or socketpuppets or even Torokko who also didn t understand what was going on here We are having new old Hungary Croatia problem Newly created disruptive account is called user Bizso Can you please talk with user and if nothing else discover his knowledge of hungarian language so that we can know if this is Toroko or somebody else Rjecina talk I am disruptive because I do not hide some facts that you don t feel good about What is this We agree on how we present history so that everybody is happy Is this what this is all about Excuse me for being so outraged by it should be the other way around I see this bullshit that Union with Hungary ended in 1526 Then Croatia was a totally autonomous part of Austria Hungary Then Croatia was in union with Hungary 1102 1526 and then in union with Austria 1526 1918 Also Kingdom of Hungary and the Lands of St Stephen were different states When I tag them for it gets removed without listing any sources I am open to alternate explanations But these are not academic viewpoints They re biased assertions with no refernce If I provide reference for the contrary it gets deleted If I provide reference for the other academic viewpoint in a disputed statement then it gets deleted Though interestingly enough the other references that support the other viewpoint are not deleted They remain there Is this what you guys think about writing an Encyclopedia I know that the sources I provided didn t confirm the view that Croatia was an idependent state But that s why I added them to list them beside the sources that say it was in personal union So that each viewpoint is represented Who decides to remove one side of the story and then calim that the other user is a vandal Then I am immediatly tagged for being someone else and threatened to be blocked This is a joke