So now Wikipedia and reading the author editor s own words first hand for yourself is are an unreliable source s as well what source is authentic and reliable None I take it for the obviously biased media monitors and sesnors with an agenda I am sure Witness in the editing history of the following page s and here that SummerPhD is a plainly and clearly biased sensor with no regard for undeniable truth or compellingly conclusive facts which would otherwise be admissible and uncontrovertibe in courts of law and or equity should they be so offered and yet they may SummerPhD and his her editorial co conspirators have in effect undermined the credibility of wikipedia through use of circular nonsenical argument if one can fairly even call it argument it s more in the nature of a bi polar borderline personalty type rant as aparent and unbridaled use of the editors pen which power ought to be withdrawn or at least suspended with public repremand by officials of Wikipedia if there are such persons If not the intentional destruction of others intellectual property rights given unto the public domain ought to be actionable under some legal writ whether sounding in tort or criminal law Keep it up SummerPhD and win yourself a heaping helping of litigation all over the world starting in Dallas Texas As a result of SummerPhD s sensoring editorial practicies SummerPhD has interjected him herself into a growing controversy over what exactly it is that SummerPhD is trying to cover up and why Unethical self dealing hacks are all you and your little group are