23 July 2008 UTC Maybe Tim could be the judge on what is the most suitable Just to clarify the error in VH W the omission of DQ2 2 DQA1 02 DQB1 02 was a small error the statement that DQA1 05 without DQB1 02 was a partial DQ2 is an error To understand why this is an error one has to read which basically found that all DQA1 0501 previously type in Europe split 2 ways DQA1 0501 DQB1 0201 and DQA1 0505 DQB1 0301 I was scolded by a referee for not knowing this and not knowing DQA1 0505 and DQA1 0501 were process to DQA1 05 DQA1 0505 is part of the DR5 DQ7 haplotype therefore in assigning DQA1 05 without DQ2 it is a DQ7 The neat plausible and wrong solution will only work up until DQ2 2 hits the reviewed literature then it needs to be dealt with At 4 of all coeliacs it may never reach that level of appreciation yap 20 13