Parishan the claim indeed is true and you are actually not saying the truth the evidence above gives examples of dozens of articles not one And your claim of double standards was being brought which you failed to address convincingly The Azeri term is the Turkic term Jerusalem s foreign names are there for a reason All Persian Urdu and Hindi qualify as such because they are relevant and present in several historic documents maps and manuscripts influencing other languages words for the place There is no proper Azeri distinct term for the place it is the official Islamic term and the variants are either Turkish or Persian We can write Jerusalem in Zulu language too it doesn t mean it has any historic or notable value The evidence above documents that the edit happened in a period when you have found various articles where Armenian terms were present and added Azeri terms when it was not relevant It was explained to you that the Armenian term for Jerusalem was present because there is an Armenian Quarter in Old Jerusalem and there are manuscripts dating back to a millennium and a half As for the notability if you d have taken the time to read others concerns you will actually remember one example in which it was asked to you to provide another source while you were stuck to one article in Azerbaijani admitting to have nothing else You ve been contributing here for a very significant period of time and should have by now known what qualifies as notable According to your standards any college teacher would qualify We have enough problems here to have to go through your articles creation and bring the notability issue Also Parishan don t you think that your consistent justifications questioning that it was retaliation are a little bit old Are you trying to insult our intelligence You ve retaliated on various circumstances on various cases and this was brought to you on many occasions Do you feel the need to have your memory refreshed You deleted Andranikpasha and expended the other article much like you have added the entry of Armenia in the anti Semitism article in the past as retaliation or worked on a NAZI person as retaliation to Vartan s point which you misinterpreted Or when you retaliated to one article where an Armenian term was added by adding Azeri term in a dozen articles This was all I had to say about the issue and if you won t come clean and admit any wrongdoings then you are in no position to talk about any other contributor s misbehaving