less the few sections that are obviously unrelated to him Some contributions in it either have been suggested to have been made by sock puppets or are discussions of whether they were or should be so regarded Further two reverted edits on it by User 259 are claimed to be unacceptable edits Its history provides evidence on both the sock puppet claims and the improper editing ones And that history is most likely to be used in those connections it is for that reason that the history was carried along to that page by page move operations while other parts of Talk Carleton College were cut and pasted to a new and historyless page Further editing of it would fall a bit short of tracking mud into a crime scene because editing does not destroy history but a sufficient number of edits make access to early history progressively more onerous and error prone Therefore in this editor s opinion such edits must be regarded as irresponsible Editors who do edit may at the least be mentioned pejoratively in a proposal to protect the sub sub page against further editing Please make any comments you may have to offer on its content on the next listed sub sub page More prosaically the sub sub page is approaching the 32 K limit and freezing its content also will avoid facing the problem of how to refactor it Talk Carleton College Re M e C h Comments on 2004 Jul 28 content It is intended to accomodate any further discussion of that content as it relates or purports to relate to User Mike Church and or Ambition game Talk Carleton College Re M e C h Charges of unacceptable edits by 259 It states and offers a place for further discussion of User Jerzy s charges that User 259 s essentially identical edits of 2004 Oct 7 23 50 UTC and 2004 Oct 8 17 24 UTC are serious offenses against WP t 06 41 2004 Oct 11 UTC