Oh Mark for shame Why lie I didn t get banned from the Clitoris article for any such thing I didn t get banned from it at all I was banned from removing the picture that upset several editors You pretended you had a unanimous consensus then too I didn t constantly run any polls That s a downright lie too Why would I I don t think polls demonstrate consensus and I oppose their use to settle content disputes I ve expressed that view many many times The dispute on clitoris in fact centred around a group of editors who were bullying minority view editors because they had won a vote They largely refused to discuss the salient issues because they believed they had won a vote and that was that Careful Tony Sidaway watchers will note that on Talk Clitoris he was insistent that winning a vote was the same as having a consensus but on Talk something about B roads he had changed his tune and thought that votes were evil Like most of the people who voted here it s one rule when it fits your POV another when it doesn t This title is shockingly POV That you can line up a bunch of editors who share the POV that it pushes to vote and say no it s not doesn t actually not make it so but I ve given up trying to get editors to accept that the proZionist stance that is so common in your home country is not actually neutral I advise the other editors here that their commitment to NPOV will not be rewarded because it simply is not shared by everyone here