In response to your note on my Talk page GD the source is the Philadelphia Inquirer an eminently reliable source Describes this whistleblower s testimony as scathing though at times vague No apparent verdict one way or the other on her credibility other than scathing though at times vague It s worth putting into the article since others are angling for a way to get ACORN s self serving spin doctoring into the article one way or another and they weren t under oath