Blindly the PIB report was submitted to the committee and they found the report incorrect I am pasting again from the report From the article the standing committee to which the report was submitted says There were clear factual inaccuracies in the army s deposition before the Standing Committee The most glaring of them is the army s suggestion that it is carrying out trials on the Arjun s performance In fact the army has already accepted the Arjun for introduction into service based upon its driving and firing performance over the years After firing trials in summer 2006 the trial report written by the army said The accuracy and consistency of the Arjun has been proved beyond doubt The ongoing trials in Pokhran that the army is citing are Accelerated Usage cum Reliability Trials AUCRT In these two Arjun tanks were run almost non stop for 3 000 kilometres not to judge performance but to evaluate the tank s requirement of spare parts fuel and lubricants during its entire service life Now how can edits be allowed on the basis of a wrong PIB report Let there be proof of correctness of this PIB report I will accept By78 s version not even my version or the original version