I mean talk about recent edits The article has been undergoing constant sneak and overt vandalism attacks by anons since it has been unprotected As for the edit in question I will agree with THOTH on the idea of talking about the origin of the Kurdish issue rather than the PKK however I might have to disagree with some of the words he used Kidding aside I think the appropriate approach would be to talk about its origins citing some good and impartial sources How Kurds feel today might not seem too relevant to his biography and might be more appropriate in other articles about Turkey The paragraph should be strictly about what he did or didn t during his political life Again I think we should be extremely careful about striking the right contextual balance In the mean time if these attacks by anons continue it might be a good idea to semi protect it for a while