You re not acting in good faith as shown by your selective quoting above If you ever wanted to discuss things in a collegiate manner you shouldn t have reverted my work with the utterly banal and uninformative reverted some of the last edit If you don t have the courtesy to explain a revert then you re not likely to be a productive person to discuss things with The manual of style explains the conventions for biographical articles and other articles You are violating the manual of style with your foolish attempt to impose your own pov on the article 190 44 158 38