Comments on the block It is a complaint and I have the rightly described the nature of edits being done by these two editors Blocking me gives a wrong signal to them and probably will encourage such concerted POV pushing I have already mentioned somewhere that the organisations supported by these editors have been mentioned as having fascist tendencies by world media They ca nt deny that Some examples against whites from User Bose There is no shortage of hindu haters among white scholars or their pinko moonbat lackeys in India Surely some hindu hater like Wendy Doniger Deepa Mehta or Arundhati Roy has a copy of the film on their website Find it Then put it up The world outside the US is irrelevant Read the para Human Rights Watch has been criticized as a fraud in See how the edits end The world outside the US is less relevant My mention of them as US government lawyer and not Wikipedia s was their attitude in the article No comment below is racist in character This is a false charge and the user who has made that should be blocked Secondly they insist on pushing some comments from Daniel Pipes who is widely known for his Pro Jewish POV leanings The complete thread of that discussion is mentioned below Refrain from inserting original research that is irrelevant to the Babri Mosque article Plus the section on Pipes you inserted is tantamount to a character assassination of well respected and US government appointed political scholar Daniel Pipes Further perpetration of such a deed is grounds for reporting Netaji Reporting as legal TerryJ Ho Is Wikipedia a US government property and you their lawyer I have taken cue from you In fact I have been everyone as Anti Hindu TerryJ Ho In this comment I have not named anyone as Hindu Taliban such inference is just an imagination I have only given a general example