I agree Some of the speculations need to be trimmed down and attributed I m removing the second section on Moore s law as it seems especially speculative I ve no idea where those numbers are from Moore s law itself is too significant to cut out entirely but I ll try to ground it more in reality I ll look for some sources for the bits in the Singularity technologies heading As for the article being uncritical I m just not seeing it There s decent sized section of attributed criticisms 03 16 23 Nov 2004 UTC