Empty Sections Should the empty sections in this biography just be removed Not really If you notice all of them are linked to articles that focus on every aspect of Pedro II s life from his birth until his death and even after Legacy Right now I am working on them One early years has been raised to GA Another one decline and fall is being reviewed and might become GA Once all are written and are considered GA I will work on Pedro II s article itself based on those focused articles Of course if someone else wants to do that on my place he or she can fell free to to it Regards National Assembly The article contains at present 8 references to National Assembly No political body existed by that name in the Empire of Brazil The Brazilian imperial parliament was called Assembl ia Geral General Assembly The General Assembly was a bicameral legislature comprising the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies see Political Constitution of the Empire of Brazil arts 13 and 14 Accordingly I propose that references to National Assembly should be changed to references the General Assembly Wikipedia should not invent names for the political institutions of a country189 122 211 125 When creating a section in an article s talk page you should do it at the bottom The name Assembl ia Geral can also be easily translated to National Assembly There are authors who use Regulating Power but also Moderating Power in reference to Poder Moderador and sometimes is not the best to make a direct translation The other articles about Brazilian imperial history also use the translation National Assembly I have found both National Assembly and General Assembly used in references National Assembly seems to have a long history in 19th century English language press and other accounts I assume that National Assembly was used to distinguish this assembly from other types of assemblies i e not the national legislature for the benefit of their English language audience I have introduced the Portuguese title for the assembly at the points where it would first be seen by readers Readers can decide the translation for themselves talk Speech from the Throne paining In the painting by Pedro Am rico called Speech from the Throne the Emperor is portrayed not actually delivering the Speech but standing before seating on the Throne to deliver the speech So I propose that the caption of the painting should not say that the emperor is portrayed delivering the Speech but about to deliver it However given that prior edits on this point have generated confusion I will post this proposal here and wait until tomorrow If there is no objection then I ll make the change It seems to me that the editor Lecen had finally agreed that the use of delivering in the caption did not reflect the reality of the painting but now another editor Astynax has again resorted to the use of that language when making an edit intended to reduce the size of the caption I agree with Astynax that the mention in the opening of the General Assembly can be suppressed but I submit that to return to the word delivering is misleading 189 122 211 125 One more time when you create a section you must do it at the BOTTOM of the talk page There is no reason to be so precise about the caption of the image It is not necessary to have him holding a piece of paper in the picture to have the right to write delivering What matter is that he was dressed in regalia due to the Speech of the Throne That s it If there is a painting of a boy with a book opened but he is not reading it yet does not mean that we can not write its capiton as Boy studying If you do want to help Wikipedia start writing other articles related to Brazilian imperial history There are plenty that have few to no info Also the wording used on this article and several others related to it tha are rated Good Articles on Assembl ia Geral is National Assembly It can not be written General Assembly on a caption wh