Hi Padma and Nat Padma I can understand your desire and frankly I see that there is precedence for it At a prior instantiation of this dab page here there was in fact a header In Buddhism I also agree with Nat insomuch that I think there is merit in only making changes to articles when merited and I guess Nat is focusing us again on the merit of the inserted reverted inserted reverted inserted text I apologize then for my perhaps putting the cart before the horse I think the inserted text contains two significantly different types of information so I d like to explore their merits independently I m gon na create two subheaders below to facilitate this talk Bath Batha Tabaath The first inserted reverted sentence reads In Islam the Arabic text Bath Batha and Tabaath is found in the Qu ran 62 2 Sura Al Jumua The Qu ran Sura 62 2 and is believed to be refering to Buddha Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarti Muhammad in World Scriptures Vol 3 pg 1007 The hidden references are The Qu ran Sura 62 2 Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarti Muhammad in World Scriptures Vol 3 pg 1007 So it appears to me that the reason that this sentence is pertinent to the word Buddha is because it identifies a possible referent in the Qu ran to the Buddha or a buddha Since this article is about definitions of the word Buddha per se and not about the historical mythic Buddha or other buddhas it seems to me that this sentence is inappropriate for this article It should go in the appropriate article e g possibly Gautama Buddha or Buddhahood Right Does this make sense This dab page is about the word Buddha and contains pointers to articles that then provide meanings to this word The above sentence alludes to the meaning of Buddha as Gautama Buddha or again perhaps Buddhahood still not clear to me from the sentence Perhaps in terms of semantic cohesion it would best fit in Gautama Buddha in world religions What do y all think talk Buddha Arabic The second inserted reverted sentence reads The origin of the word Buddha in Arabic is of descent or he roused him and put into action Buddha Foretels The Advent of Muhammad The hidden reference is 4 Buddha Foretels The Advent of Muhammad Here this sentence does in fact provide a new instance of the word Buddha separate from the existing denotations of Gautama Buddha Buddhahood Buddharupa etc I think the next question becomes whether or not every instantiation of this word is worthy of an entry on this WP dab page For example I previously mentioned one prior suggestion that an entry be identified as a noteworthy instance of the word in another reliable source such as the Encyclopedia Britannica the Columbia Encyclopedia dictionaries from Oxford University Press etc Nat mentioned the matter of each entry on this dab page being associated with an individual WP article e g Buddha Records Buddha Air etc This sentence appears to fail to meet either of these suggested standards Perhaps if not worthy of an entry in the WP encyclopedia might it be worth an entry in the Wiktionary here Does the need for encyclopedic significance make sense Thanks for your continued civil discourse talk