Prevailing opinion The prevailing opinion seems to be to include the photograph of human feces even if you remove the alleged voting irregularities However those who opposed the image in the past are now placing the image at the bottom of the page and reducing the size to a thumbnail Two new issues arise 1 SIZE of photo and 2 PLACEMENT of photo NOTE The following poll is NOT to debate inclusion of the photo For that debate SCROLL DOWN If you do not believe the photo should be included on the page at all DO NOT VOTE IN THIS POLL VOTE HERE ON SIZE The photo size should be Normal size 200px Thumbnailed 100px Vote VOTE HERE ON PLACEMENT The photo should be at or near the Top Bottom Vote Archived Discussions This page is too big I d like to see the following archived discussions on eating poop non controversial discussions on whether or not people are sock puppets should be at RFC debate on blocking the page in the past moot debate on unblocking the page in the past moot stupid comments like put the poop in the freezer vandalism I tried it once but I got a rude message from SlimVirgin Does anybody else have an objection to this Let the admins do it Shall there be photos of feces Why is there no picture of fresh feces I understand there are problems with obtaining legal pictures on other Wikipedia pages but obtaining a picture of fresh feces is probably one of the easiest things The old photo before was small petrified and not characteristic of human feces I have added a new photo which is more representative of a typical stool Sigh Is this really necessary Is there any reason that you have taken a picture of your dung other than for shock value I m going to shrink this so it s a little less visually putrid This is an article on feces There is no shock value when one looks up feces and finds gasp feces I have also included pigeon and rabbit feces Sometimes you have to step back take a look at yourself and realize that you are arguing about posting a picture of a turd Fine have your turd I m off to better smelling areas of Wikipedia INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE PROJECT THE IMAGE APPEARS OUT OF CONTEXT AND WHILE FAIRLY AMMUSING TO REGULARS WILL NOT BE UNDERSTOOD BY ROOKIES WHO MAY MIS INTERPRET IT out of context where might the proper context be I think the image is absolutely disgusting and doesn t deserve to be in the article However the caption for it could be incorporated into the article Human Feces Photo Is it necessary I ve noticed there has been quite a bit of debate over whether there should be a picture of human feces on the this article and I have a simple question is such a picture really necessary No it is not Nothing in Wikipedia is really necessary Least of all necessary is your question which you could have avoided asking if you had actually read the debate I figured I d get the if you actually read the debate response I was as you can clearly see too lazy to read all of it Or any of it Why are you here He s here because it s a free encycloped