Thanks for your patience All seems resolved but here s the back and forth for future reference Ozzie10aaaa added On November 1 it was reported that there might be a decrease in the number of cases however it is still not certain why local culture is also distorting the figures Traditional burial rites involve relatives touching the body a practice that can spread Ebola so the Liberian government has ruled that Ebola victims must be cremated one source was cited as saying I FourViolas reverted with the comment Undid revision 632278400 by Ozzie10aaaa talk Couple issues Dailybeast com isn t WP Reliable enough for such a claim and citing the news needs more than a url Ozzie10aaaa reverted my reversion with Undid revision 632279222 by FourViolas talk we will find a different source then thank you and deleted the DailyBeast reference with I hope that reference is better mister sic have a nice day I came here see above and later added a with the comment added material remains noncompliant with MoS Ozzie10aaaa supplied refs to an article in marines mil which didn t mention a decrease in infection rate and a USA Today article which did Following the lead to the WHO press briefing referenced in the second citation and my own unjustified feeling that USA Today is a good but not the best possible source I changed the two sentences in question to On 29 October the WHO announced that the rate of new infections in Liberia was declining but urged continued vigilance against a reversal of this trend with comment Thanks for pointing to the WHO press conference I rewrote in line with a good source Please note the citation template cite news Ozzie10aaaa with imo justified suspicion of my precocious edit history brought their suspicions to who had broached her own suspicions previously btw I categorically deny being a sockpuppet and understand but am saddened by the interpretation of my good faith efforts to learn the rules before editing as evidence against me Was that TMI TLI or just right