I think this is fairly ridiculous The fact of the matter is that the word existed and was used before the Runnymede Report Does that mean I m debating that the Runnymede Report brought it center stage and made the world more aware No Absolutely not However I think that the purpose of those wanting the Runnymede Report to be the starting point is to attempt to make it appear to be a neologism I m sorry but we have definite sources going back to 82 and a possible going back to 76 And realistically we have words that are newer than that which don t face the same scrutiny such as AIDS was also first used in 1982 The fact of the matter is I do believe that usage before the Runnymede Report was rare but most certainly existent and therefore think it should be mentioned in the history of the term