If this article did indeed have a neutral point of view we would expect just as many complaints from people believing that circumcision is a good thing as complains from people believing that circumcision is a bad thing The people believing that circumcision is a good thing would complain that it is too negative while the people believing that circumcision is a bad thing would complain that it is too positive Here however we see almost only people complaining that the article is too positive to circumcision while we see almost no one complaining that this article is too negative to circumcision I also think it is a bit stupid to always have a neutral point of view Then we should let nazis and fascists be heard as much human right activists Personally I think the voice of human right activists should be louder on wikipedia and do we really have any right to deform our babies unless it is absolutely necessary for medical reasons