The section currently initially titled Intro currently titled Dispute unless it gets renamed again was a direct reply to the announcement of the survey disputing my assertion that there was a need for a survey Since Dispute did not sufficiently describe the content of the section I re named it to Is there a dispute based on the first sentence RJII had written Is there even much of a dispute about the intro After it became clear that people were actually responding to RJII s objections and that a productive discussion was taking place RJII took the extra step of re arranging the sections so that the disucssion no longer made sense I now have the opinion that disrupting discussion of this article is s explicit intent