Two reasons The first is the decision of to contact They didn t overlap as editors HK30 was blocked in May2006 Professor33 wasn t created until June 2006 HK30 posted this email over at Wikipedia review Giovanni33 admits to being Professor33 even though at the time he denied it is as vocally as he denies his other more recent sock puppets Professor33 contacted HK30 for help to get unblocked The only other people he contacted were admins In the email and in other places Professor33 published the material that HK30 was banned over In reality HK30 and Professor33 are the same person according to MusicalLinguist as well and he used the HK30 to publish the email at Wikipedia review It was practically the only thing that HK30 did at Wikipedia Review and he used that account because it was already banned at Wikipedia indefinitely here s more evidence but you ve probably seen this Giovanni33 has also admitted that ML was correct about his sockpuppets His denial about HK30 is not credible given all of his admissions the evidence that link all the accounts he has admitted to the coincidences and the material being published by his sockpuppets being so similar including the outing information