Again I am well aware And I believe I am aware enough to realize that such polls statistics and third party tickets are worthy of note such as in this election What I am saying however is that something as simple as infobox inclusions should be consensual and fair That appears to be what everyone is not in consensus with I don t see why we re confusing readers by making it seem as though the election is currently between four parties Technically it s between many parties Four or really five have the gained the ability to be on ballots that would accumulate 270 electoral votes Two dominate the race If and when the latter changes which would be caused by media coverage by the way as very real as ballot access we should reflect that Currently we re fooling people due to bureaucracy at a superficial level at least My comments about the 2000 election were an example of possible overcoverage Had that been on ongoing eletion like this one you would likely be supporting their negligable entries in the infobox I never meant to appear disrespectful or ignorant but we must take more into account than ballot access for representative coverage