Specific BLP issues In re reading this article earlier today I noticed a few issues which I think might represent undue weight or trivia which we could probably lose They were not added by myself but appear to have been added to the article fairly recently I ve not taken them out myself but am bringing them here for discussion so that we can find a consensus on what to do about them If other editors have issues of concern please post them below so that we can address them too 1 Under Entrepreneurship Monckton and his wife opened Monckton s a high end shirt shop in King s Road Chelsea in 1995 While this is reliably sourced it looks very trivial and I ve not seen any mention of it anywhere else I suggest leaving this out 2 Under Political views Monckton s CV 32 as Chief Policy Adviser at the Science and Public Policy Institute SPPI claims that the correction of a table inserted by IPCC bureaucrats earned him the status of Nobel Peace Laureate In January 2010 Monckton voiced this claim on an Australian radio broadcast When later questioned about this by reporters 33 Monckton conceded that his claim to have won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 was a joke As of 6 June 2010 the claim that Monckton is a Nobel Peace Laureate has not been removed from the SPPI web site This strikes me as a relatively trivial issue and I suggest that this is undue weight The last sentence of it is clearly unsourced and appears to be original research At the very least WP BLP requires that to be removed 3 Under Social and economic policy Criticizing the campaign to save the Ravenscraig ironworks Monckton wrote The Scots are subsidy junkies whingeing like crumpled bagpipes and waiting for a fix of English taxpayers money In 1997 Monckton criticized works at the Fotofeis the Scottish International Festival of Photography and Sensation as feeble minded cheap pitiable exploitative sensationalism perpetrated by the talent free and perpetuated by over funded useless muddle headed middle aged pot bellied brewer s droopy quangoes which a courageous Government would forthwith cease to subsidise with your money and mine Again this seems to me to be undue weight on comments which lack any context and appear to have been selected to make Monckton look bad There is no indication of wider significance it looks very much like cherry picking Suggest removal of both of these bits