Regarding intelligent design I am of the opinion that intelligent design is written from a non neutral point of view and more importantly some articles on its proponents give undue weight to their errors It is also my opinion that all of the alleged conduct issues surrounding the editors are related to content Am I the only one who believes this Let s close this RFC and take it to mediation I think the only aspects of this dispute worth are Is the intelligent design article written from a neutral point of view If not how shall we fix them and Do the intelligent design related BLPs give undue weight to negative information about the article subjects If not is that a problem