Credibility Consideration I have reviewed the methodology of Mr Starks and feel that it warrents special consideration as a valid research refrence Mr Stark uses sound science and takes great lengths to compensate for the fundamentally difficult nature of researching stigmatized subject matter I would hate to see his work dismissed without consideration Wikipedia is rooted in Boldness so altho Peer Reviewed Journal support would be preferable i can not in good conscience dismiss sound scientific research done on topics as relevant and elusive as human sexuality I would love to hear from others about this expcetion to the policy