I m afraid that some of the editors here are misinterpreting the primary sources policy Primary sources are materials like census data frequently cited by editors engaged in original research or axe grinding But this group seems to think that primary sources are any and all sources connected to SGI which must be disallowed This is clearly overreach When you have a question about Catholic doctrine it s OK to cite a Catholic theologian or The Catholic Encyclopedia Meanwhile we are allowing sources like The Road to Total Freedom A Sociological Analysis of Scientology How is that relevant unless the goal is to imply that both Scientology and the Soka Gakkai are deviant religions And we allow conspiracy theories sourced to Shukan Shincho one of those tabloid style weeklies I refered to earlier which are notorious for irresponsible journalism I m sorry but I m afraid this article has a serious POV problem It reads like a systematic attempt to paint the organization in an unfavorable light as if it had been dogged by scandal at every step in its history There is blatant editorializing the new Leadership section Many of the few sympathetic statements are followed by a but that immediately takes it back So I m going to tag it as POV something I ve never done before And if possible I think the tag should stay for a while to give other editors a chance to work on these issues