Paradoxic well it certainly is in everyone s best interest that Shia editors do present all relevant factual material about their faith And I don t think anyone suspects that Shia editors have an agenda it s just that one of the tricky things about Wikipedia religion articles is that the people who know the most the members of the given religion can also find very easily find themselves slipping into POV That s natural I appreciate that you have already written in a way that is different from pure Shia POV and 100 accept that instances of Glorious Quran or whatever are genuine slips and in no way an attempt to institute an agenda Regards