Further revisions by Coralapus Sorry Coralapus I ve hacked at your edits I work on the notion of reducing argumentativeness in the article This means I think one should state a view and provide some contrasting material where relevant One should avoid This is the case But actually Yet this is more accurate type passages Also material added usually needs a secondary source I left the Stephen Goranson links this time although I don t think they are relevant here But then again XKV8R has included an article of mine that I don t think is appropriate here The page is about Qumran and its archaeology Most interpretations of the site not by archaeologists are usually more about the scrolls than Qumran If you think my editing of your work has been tendentious try to get another editor in to comment on it so that we can avoid any unnecessary edits