Congrats for your day Hello LadyofShalott Congratulations for having now your day It must feel good Well since you have been so nice and kind I couldn t refrain myself from not asking you for advice I have been involved in a hard discussion regarding an historical issue It has to do with the monopolization of a serious of related articles by one editor basicaly this editor insists in considering an resistance monarchic movement Chetniks and its leader Dra a Mihailovi a Nazy collaborator The movement fought the Germans but also the Tito s Partisans another resistance group Since the second ones won the war Tito condemned and executed Mihailovic charging him on treason USA organised an post mortum trial and freed the movement of the charges and condecorated Mihailovic France too Since the movement fought both the Germans and the Partisans some detachments ocasionally collaborated but it was maynly a three side war Anyway this user Direktor manipulating and exageratins sources that talk about that ocasional collaboration wants to impose that the entire movement and Mihailovic are to be considered notable collaborators and its role as resistance efforts ignored Well despite WP AGF this user as a Croat and assumed Titoist Tito was the leader of the Partisans a communist guerilla obviously has no nice feelings towards a Serb monarchic movement and edited the article having in mind only his POV The worst is that when other editors want to edit the articles he is very agressive and reverts all that doesn t fit his ideology He was blocked several times for breaking the 3r role I demanded that the article includes more NPOV so a discussion started Another editor that also agrees with me already asked for mediation so wi will see what will happend A nazy collaboration accusation is a too serious accusation to be left unsourced Anyway my problem is regarding this users attitude towards me He constantly manipulates my words same way as he does with the sources and does all the possible and impossible so his version will prevail He unfairlly accused me of many things but when talking about me or my edits he used the following expressions Lack of knolledge info 7times Nonsence 5 times Horrible faulty grammar 5 times Me having no idea whatsoever 3 times childish 2 times Lying 2 times Me being nationalist 2 times unnencyclopedic 2 times Absurd 2 times Stupid 1 time Clumsy 1 time Silly 1 time Ridiculous 2 times Slauderous 1 time My opinion irrelevant 1 time me joking 1 time Missinformed 1 time Utterly flawed ideas 1 time and many more indirectly tageting me When I asked him please to be polite and avoid using this expressions he accused me of imagining provocation He also constantly speaks as he is a community The discussion is found here Talk Dra a Mihailovi Should I report him for this behaviour P S I am really sorry for my long comment and for involving youm but since you are an admin and a excellent wikipedian I needed to ask you if I am obligated to tolerate this kind of language