Reversions I recently reverted a series of edits I m concerned because I thought that we were on the same page the article needs independent reliable third party sources The edits in question elaborated at great length on Young s claims as if they were fact relying heavily on promotional sources directly affiliated with Young I d like to take these one at a time and discuss whether the sourcing is appropriate rather than throwing a huge chunk of text into the article rehashing devoid of context Young s claims Where should we start