Let me take those in turn I admit I missed the date put a couple spaces below the actual article in the Sun Can t imagine how I missed that There is no Edition Beauce source listed in the article I never said the CBC is not a reliable source you completely made that up or that it did it math wrong As to the latter what I said was that it was one of three options that could reconcile its use of 67 with a birth year of 1943 I never commented on the Globe and Mail at all I merely removed it because it was being used to support a proposition that it doesn t actually support As a result I ve once again removed it as a supporting ref for the September 1 1942 claim