Including Rand s criticism s in the article is going to be met with considerable resistance There are plenty of major philosophers and Rand isn t one of them who have made important criticisms of Kant some cited above and there should be plenty of material to research without resorting to authors who you have grossly distorted and misunderstood Kant s views as Rand has Anyone with a reasonable understanding of Kant can see that Rand s criticisms are emotive and lack understanding of Kant s philosophy Rand is nothing more than a finger pointer and is not well received as an earnest philosopher of substance