On page 414 he starts by mentioning the 4 fold Vinaya classification male female both neither Then he cites Zwilling page 205 as saying the Atharva Veda distinguishes pandakas from males females and implies that they were transvestites The grammar of Harvey s sentence doesn t make clear whether it was the AV or Zwilling that was doing the implying Harvey goes on to report Buddhaghosa as saying both pandakas hermaphrodites are determined from conception He continues citing Buddhaghosa as listing 5 types of pandaka one who fellates a man a voyeur one who ejaculates by some means unspecified one who through karma is a pandaka only 1 2 the month non male