Redundant and trivial content Redundant trivial content A lot of unsourced edits are being uploaded rapidly to articles on French royalty Some appear dubious others wrong Yet requests for reputable citations are ignored deleted or inadequately sourced page numbers in books are essential to verify if the citation is accurate while the wholesale editing continues Please respond to these requests either with reputable sources or more careful edits before adding additional unsourced material Also much of the added material is redundant excessive or trivial I ve already recorded repeated objections to 1 unsourced allegations e g that seem unprecedented unlikely or undocumentable are apt to be deleted unless precisely sourced 2 redundancies if it s in a box on the page it s apt to be deleted from the text 3 excess details which belong in another person s article e g parent spouse child or which describe hard to verify details e g She felt envious unless it s an attributed quote from a diary or correspondence how is it possible to know what someone who died hundreds of years ago felt or thought Let s stick to what they verifiably said or did 4 gallicization names and titles when combined OK but members of dynasties that ruled outside France Lorraine Savoy Modena Bouillon Monaco etc shouldn t be gallicized except for cadets born into a branch naturalised in France well known phrases yes untranslatable terms maybe just for the sake of a more French sound or feel to the article not usually and subject to deletion Other editors will of course have their own views Please don t use sockpuppets I look forward to better mutual cooperation and better Wiki articles Thanks