Of course the writer failed to report that 7 of 9 editors who voted in that discussion were opposed to the inclusion of Cali as a casualty and that the inclusion was ultimately removed And that the use of alleged with respect to the kidnapping and murder was likewise rejected by all but a few editors though retained or replaced with suspected for the exposition of assumed facts which can and will never be proven All in all a very selective and distorted presentation concerning the discussions that occurred here And why on earth is the writer rehashing this now more than a year after those discussions ended Somebody needs to find a real job