Trustworthiness I think the section on trustworthiness misses the point The point it seems to make is this should not work at all but it kinda looks like it seems like it might at least so far so meh Not exactly a ringing endorsement I would argue it will work and it will be trustworthy and that this type of system has been under test for about 4 billion years Life evolved to the working examples that it is through random mutation and natural selection Wikis evolve through usually non random and intelligent mutation and usually intelligent selection based on facts So it should not only work as well as evolution it should work far better and far faster Just like there are people who assume evolution will not work there are people who will assume a Wiki will not work and probably for the same reasons well other than religion because it seems complicated an esoteric with so much seemingly left to freedom and chance when in fact the wikis are constantly selected back to the facts There may be some messiness and missteps along the way but both systems will eventually arrive at working solutions I suppose however that at any given instant a wiki could have been vandalized and not fixed yet so thus untrustworthy Unlikely but quite possible So perhaps the original section would be accurate barring some technological solution Like coloring any change that is less than 24 hours old or not reviewed or something Meh