Haire Stopes squabble I have removed the contribution you made to the Marie Stopes article as it doesn t meet Wiki criteria in a number of areas 1 Its length was disproportionate to the significance of the material it dealt with 2 It lacked citations to meet Wiki criteria of support 3 It s discussion of Ettie Rout adds nothing to what has already been said via Haire 4 Its comment about the New Gospel is irrelevant to the substance of the material 5 It is not neutral in tone as reflected in some of the vocabulary used eg boasted brave childishly and the editorial use of squabbling such as ignorance quackery the reference to Christian Science discredited 6 It is misleading putting so much emphasis on the harmful nature of the gold pin when Stopes never used it 7 It is tendentious predominantly presenting the views of one side of the dispute I really don t think the basic material constructively adds to the article