You have also repeatedly pointedly refused to address the issues of whether you are related to individuals who are or have been employees It is also of course possible that given your habit of rigorous definition you might be a contracter assigned to Landmark but not employed by them directly or perhaps in some way some sort of shareholder particularly if you were an employee under an early version of the organization Given the tendency to very deliberately parse words which you have displayed including in the recent arbitration I think it is reasonable that your words be taken to say only what they absolutely literally must mean and that s all