Response I m sorry to hear that you are so upset over the unblock of Matt57 However it seems from your comments on various pages that you believe such issues should be based on weight of numbers i e the amount of people who agree with them rather than on fact This assertion I fundamentally disagree with While one could easily to claim that a few people agreed with the block therefore it was consensual one should look deeper and examine the underlying reasons and facts It was alleged that Matt posted personal information but he didn t It was said that Matt was editing the same articles as Elonka but he wasn t It was stated that he spread the dispute with bad faith accusations on commons but he didn t do that either This indicates that the charge of harassment is on shaky grounds at best That is not to say Matt s behavior should be endorsed for he hasn t been particularly friendly to Elonka but it is important to note that neither has she been particularly friendly to him Perhaps Matt has been reading her contribs log which does not in itself constitute stalking but it is obvious that she has been reading his Matt may be tackling the issue the wrong way but his underlying point that the Dunin family articles may have COI or POV problems is not a priori invalid When two people are in dispute blocking one of them in this fashion is not an effective way of resolving it