September 2008 UTC Not really a winner Looking at it in parts The agreement was designed to be terminatable grumbling It appears to have been done and But I m very annoyed that JHunterJ failed to notify me of the discussion or the result not sure if he mentioned it to you Collectonian Co really should ve signed that agreement but refused to do so and all I can do is sigh at the moment because I do see part of the complaint above misrepresented and Abtract Ab is partially off the hook This revert by Co wasn t helpful if it was just correcting the date a partial revert was all that was needed The full revert of the history with will fix rest up in a minute isn t going to fly and appears as a WP OWN problem and of course it will escalate the situation Predictably Ab reverted here his get away woman comment in the edit summary would surely escalate this further I won t be surprised if he s going to say that he intended it to mean don t revert in full then I spent my time contributing That s the part he s off the hook Ab filed a 3RR report on Co where he was not involved in the dispute The reverts on the 3RR report did show edit warring both Michael and Co were involved and Stifle protected the page see But as Co points out civil discussion was already under way on the issue at Co s talk page prior to the 3RR being filed It s one thing to genuinely file a report as an uninvolved editor in a dispute but it s another when you ve been repeatedly told to stay away from each other Why file the 3RR report despite being in the latter category The harassment claims are not meritless here As there was clearly editwarring I don t think an indef block will be supported but it s time for sanctions There were so many drama invitations in this case primarily though brought on by Collectonian s refusal to sign the agreement Collectonian wants nothing less than Abtract to stop It goes both ways Whether Abtract created the article because it was on Collectonian s to do list or because he wanted to remains to be seen I suggest the following remedies to be enacted Should in the opinion of any administrator Abtract make any edit which constitutes harassment of Collectonian he may be briefly blocked for up to 3 months in the event of repeat offenses Note this remedy may be expanded in scope to include harassment of any other user if it is later deemed necessary in the opinion of 3 administrators If Collectonian has made an edit in any article Abtract is prohibited from reverting it in full or part Note if the edit was reverted in part by editor X and it was reinserted in part by an editor other than Collectonian Abtract may revert that part If Abtract has made an edit in an article Collectonian is prohibited from reverting it in full or part Note if the edit was reverted in part by editor X and it was reinserted in part by an editor other than Abtract Collectonian may revert that part Should a user violate these 2 restrictions they may be blocked for up to 1 week in the event of repeated violations Both users are already aware of the Bold Revert Discuss cycle and are reminded that edit warring has a disruptive and detrimental effect on Wikipedia Should either user edit war in the future they may be subject to further sanctions including wider revert limitations blocks and bans The alternative to the above set of remedies is this one Abtract and Collectonian are banned from interacting with or directly or indirectly commenting on each other on any page in Wikipedia Should either user violate their bans they may be blocked for up to one week After the fifth such violation the maximum block length shall be increased to one month Note this remedy may be expanded in scope to include interaction of any other user if it is later deemed necessary in the opinion of 3 administrators to prevent harassment Both users are already aware of the Bold Revert Discuss cycle and are reminded that edit warring has a disruptive and detrimental effect on Wikipedia Should either user edit war in the future they may be subject to further sanctions including wider revert limitations blocks and bans I think that s about it 1