Maltese dog You can go over every single change at the history section of the article One of those changes would be There you can find out much on the content dispute It was narrowed up to these points Whether or not to mention the fact that Mljet is in today s Croatia Whether or not to mention one of the Croatian names for the dog French name included in the infobox Whether or not to mention the fact established by La F d ration Cynologique Internationale which says His name does not signify that he originates from the island of Malta as the first sentence of the dog s standard Whether or not to include Bochart in his Hierozoicon also quotes Callimachus to be correct Whether or not to include this sentence During the first century Publius the Roman governor of Malta had a Maltese named Issa of which he was very fond just after the completely POV sentence Maltese are generally associated with the island of Malta in the Mediterranean Sea thus injustly strengthening the claim of the POV sentence Whether or not to include in the history section the entire Publius Martial poetry or perhaps in the trivia section I belive that it would be biased to mention Italy Spain Lyons Malta and some other countries which have less to do with the dog and not to mention Mljet in the context of Dalmatia and Croatia is full of accusations and disruptive he offended Tool2Die4 started his negative approach by name calling like East European Croatian Yugoslav Italian He is the only one who sees my editing as problematic I can not stress enought that deleted sourced information with his POV editing and that the diff shows only his intervention Also I would like to mention that Tool2Die4 also edited the article stopped reverting my editing when I provided explanation of my editing on his talk page Then Pietru il Boqli offended him And finally before I started editing the Maltese dog article it was completely Malta biased version which Pietru il Boqli and some other editors Tool2Die4 including maintained