Re acceptance of Younger s article Hi David Many thanks indeed for intervening in the review process for the Younger s article I m not sufficiently well informed to understand the processes you describe but I m certainly happy with the verdict and outcome I can t honestly see the content of this article being seriously challenged at any point as there are no other sources I m aware of that would contradict the content that is in place I noted a couple of minor discrepancies between the two main sources used Keir and Ritchie and so amended the article after the initial review to circumvent any contradictions for example Keir states that Wm Younger knew about brewing prior to his arrival in Edinburgh whereas Ritchie has him doing an apprenticeship in a brewery after his arrival Of course neither statement is verifiable without seeing the primary sources for them In that instance I had to follow my hunch that while Keir may be speculating his statement made good sense As I have a longstanding interest in the subject I ll try to improve the article if I come across further sources I especially appreciate your taking the time and trouble to set out reasons for the article s acceptance on its talkpage I think the initial reviewer being a U S citizen would simply not appreciate the position regarding the subject s notability in a UK framework or the fact that we can only know about Younger s history from the firm s own archive So thanks once again for your divine intervention