There is absolutely no cause to be patronizing and insulting This can happen when a recipient becomes uncomfortable holding his her position but does not want to admit it How do you know that other users of Wikipedia would not be interested By deleting the section from Wikipedia without even mentioning it in the location of the redirect you have effectively eliminated any possibility of finding out Are you also going to fix the error in Wiktionary to make sure that this error is not propogated I tried your suggested exercise replacing phenome or phenomics with phenotypes and got the following non sequiturs The biological coherence of human phenotypes databases Entity quality based logical definitions for the human skeletal phenotypes using PATO Systematic phenotypes analysis of Escherichia coli multiple knockout mutants reveals hidden reactions in central carbon metabolism From the genome to the phenotypes and back An integrative network approach to map the transcriptome to the phenotypes Phenotypes analysis in plant species using loss of function and gain of function mutants What new cell biology findings could bring to therapeutics is it time for a phenotypes project in Toxoplasma gondii Colloquium papers Numbering the hairs on our heads the shared challenge and promise of phenotypes While a few of them might be manipulated further to work they all take away from the actual meaning that the author intended I see that phenomics is also now redirected to phenotype This is an even bigger stretch I think According to Wikipedia Synonyms are different words with identical or very similar meanings The meanings intended by authors who use the terms phenome or phenomics are most often not the same as phenotype or phenotypes I am at a complete loss to understand the logic of your position on this matter