On Batvette is a conspiracy theorist who have often clashed with on this talk page I don t take anything he says seriously Oh I m sorry you must have the wrong article The distort someone s position on an issue to discredit their person and assume your opinion of them gives added weight as an editor article is somewhere else I gave a reason for my support if you can not address that save your drivel for someone else Your rude demeanor is wholly unwikilike and many people have disagreements with your consensus yet you immediately archive their comments to hide them Not that I agree with your right to sit in judgment about that I ve just looked for a DIFF regarding but couldn t find any Would you please give me just ONE diff showing why you refuse to listen to anything Batvette has to say Anyone interested in understanding the perspective Batvette comes from simply needs to read his rants in Archive 3 of this talk page I see what you mean I ve dealt with so many cranks rationality challenged individuals that I forgot him And you re another Wasn t that helpful to improving the article You just made a mistake The correct response is NOT sarcasm it s the demand that Arthur Rubin STOP his Personal Attack You are an Administrator Arthur Rubin you should not say such things about another user and you know that So I urge STOP the Personal Attack on It violates Wikipedia rules How many time must I ask you Arthur and you Loremaster to STOP your Personal Attacks Although personal attacks should be avoided as much as possible there are sometimes justified to make people realize that an editor is becoming a problem I didn t see that exception on the wiki page forbidding personal attaks Can you show me this If an editor is being disruptive it is perfectly normal that other editors will personally attacking him by virtue of criticizing his disruptive behavior There doesn t need to be a written exception to Wikipedia guidelines for something that is common sense I m sorry but that exception does NOT appear on the wiki policy page forbidding personal attacks and I don t recall any disruptive behaviour on my part but I m sure you ll allege some grave offense that only exists in the archive of your mind If you think otherwise produce it Otherwise you re out of line mister The rant I see here involves a Personal attack on by You have no right to attack him as a conspiracist even if he is one which he s not He might even be a Marxist for all you know and we no longer live underMcCarthyism It seems you have been doing to him precisely what you ve been doing to me if you can not win an argument you go into your self righteous attack mode of protecting this article from everyone Now I ask you on behalf of him as well as myself PLEASE STOP your personal attacks on the both of us Thanks to so incredibly polite under the circumstances I ve located the so called rant s Ludvikus vouching that Batvette is not a crank must be the funniest thing I ve heard on this talk page Seriously am I being punked Everyone who has taken the time to read all of Batvette s rants rather than only the first one comes to conclusion that Batvett