It was unduly provocative to do what you did straight off a yearlong ban i e walk in throw out the lead which has been written and rewritten several times as per talk and throw in your own personal text unsourced with material copied from Amadeus You also removed large blocks of material that were impeccably sourced in what looks more like WP IDONTLIKEIT rather than respect for WP NPOV So be a little more careful in future and I suggest use the talk page more often A large number of people have read the page over the past month and very few objections have been raised to sourced material you summarily deleted I edited according to WP FILMLEAD which the editors seem to be ignoring Now I m not sure why in heaven you think just because some material or other is sourced then it must be in an article Its all cherry picking isn t it Anyhow to repeat check out WP FILMLEAD then check out 300 film then look at my edits and the edit summary provided If you then have questions let me know In the meantime I ve changed out loosely for fictionalized as per the article I just recommended I reformatted the information as per policy But I left in the giant out of weight plot synopsis to show you how out of place it is Ta