The splitting out of the Criticism Section and making a separate Criticism Article is a direct violation of the neutral point of view policy Specifically refer to Breaking out trivial or controversial sections Also see WP CFORK from which I quote A point of view POV fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid neutral point of view guidelines often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts All POV forks are undesirable on Wikipedia as they avoid consensus building and therefore violate one of our most important policies Furthermore the Religion article does not even mention the criticism anywhere The ideal would be to completely incorporate the criticism directly into the text i e merging the criticism article with the religion article Since that has not been done we must at least have a criticism section in the religion article Right now the criticisms have been deliberately removed from the article creating a POV fork Also note Wikipedia s policy on Tag team editing Tag teams work in unison to push a particular point of view Tag team editing to thwart core policies neutral point of view verifiability and no original research or to evade procedural restrictions such as the three revert rule or to violate behavioural norms by edit warring or to attempt to exert ownership over articles or otherwise to prevent consensus prevailing is prohibited In conclusion the Religion article requires a criticism section to abide by Wikipedia s guidelines The following banner must be placed on the Religion page as well