What you just said is perfectly reasonable so you go ahead with the proposed changes See also Further reading General information and ISBN template I see nothing wrong with any of that so we have consensus Verbatim restoration of reverted material is consistent with WP BRD and apparent WP VANDAL and was not intended to be rude or any kind of in your face confrontation The modified list was not verbatim it was a response to inline template request for example of scholarly discussions WP Link rot says that the one who causes dead links creation of empty see references by removal of the referenced section s is responsible for cleaning them up The length of the article made the internal links to parts of it convenient for the reader and now some of them have been made into useless annoyances producing no results appearing like one form of WP VANDTYPES Blanking illegitimate which makes the encyclopedia look bad You have some work to do WP EL states Some acceptible links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on topic You admitted that some of what was reverted contained further research that is accurate and on topic I ll meanwhile go ahead and partly resequence the list of Biblical Translations on the basis of your own suggestion to group them by how they render the translation of the word and still keep the current basic historical order 21st century back to BCE 3rd century I ll access the Bibref site for on line accessible Tanakh versions that use tachash tachashim including those that have no English text Masoretic The article would show the most recent works using tahash tachash skins and blue skins for orot tehasim without establishing any kind of conclusion that they are the best or most accurate translations Could include nb footnote pointing out The fact that these are the most recent translations should not be taken as evidence or proof that these are the best or most accurate translations I ll contact the WP WikiProject Bible site asking members if there is any source for image s of the Samaritan Torah text of Exodus 25 5 we might download to establish for the reader one way or the other whether the yud yodt is included in this earliest pre Masoretic exemplar of the Hebrew text It wouldn t be OR but an illustration of statements in Gesenius Hebrew Grammar 30 regarding lack of matres lectionis before 10th century BCE An image of that would really be interesting And if there is an on line accessible text of the Samaritan Torah that would be a useful link If there is and it can t be linked from the article a notation in the article could be provided a footnote or a suggestion to the reader that it can be found on line