We had a mural of both Itliong and Vera Cruz but the mural didn t fall into public domain I had found fair use images but due to fair use the images can only be placed on the biography articles beyond that is stretching it Reading above it appears that the opposition is due to Malkin s opinions This doesn t change the fact that she is a Filipino American and is the most notable whether one considers the author famous or infomous doesn t change the notability aspect Filipino American author known outside of the Filipino American community I have looked at other authors within the Category American writers of Filipino descent and none are as notable as Malkin Alumit 13k google hits Bacho 130k Manguerra Brainard 22 9k Buchholdt 2 9k Bulosan 121k Casper 369k de Las Casas 121k Estrada 442k Gloria 9 14 m Gonzalez 116k Gotera 15k Holthe 11 7k Malkin 9 89 m RDML Mariano 429k Murray 538k Nezhukumatathil 20 4k de la Paz 9 36 m Realuyo 15 8k B J Reyes 1 1 m L Reyes 417k Robles 113k Santons 1 13 m H Sasrowardo 8 85k R Sastrowardoyo 86 3k Tabios 50 5k Tenorio 12 3k Veridiano Ching 9 17k Villa 466k Some come close but not are nearly as notable Looking at WP LEADIMAGE the subject s portrait does not have shock value It is a portrait of a Filipina female it isn t as the example describes treatment of prisoners or corpses from the camps The portrait image is not of a shocking nature it is not like it is of a corpse or mutilated cadaver Therefore I think that 2 of LEADIMAGE does not apply Looking at the quote taken from her blog above the editor advocating for removal of the subject is doing what the subject writes about dismissing her ethnicity I am looking at the front page of google results and I am finding the following 1 her website 2 Her Wikipedia page 3 News articles that mention her 4 Her twitter 5 Her profile on townhall com 6 her facebook page 7 Her Youtube page 8 Her profile page on jewishworldreview com 9 Her profile on nationalreview com 10 Her profile on humaevents com I did not find any of the links that another user provided in their comments on the lead search results for the subject therefore the subject doesn t appear to be as controversial as the other editor portrays Based on the top 10 google results for the subject the subject is clearly conservative but that shouldn t be a reason why the subject should be excluded from the infobox least we confirm criticism of Wikipedia