style border top solid thin lightgrey background transparent padding 4px Response to third opinion request style padding left 0 6 cm I don t see any grounds for complaints about BLP here since the information is something that the subject herself claims to be true The only exception would be if Satine Phoenix has said somewhere that it s not true the mere claim that a porn actress is in a relationship with another woman does not seem to me to be inherently libellous The question therefore is as to whether the subject is a RS about herself given that the website is essentially a self published source The criterion that applies here is whether the material is unduly self serving Given the context it s entirely possible that this is promotional but I don t think it s unduly self serving in a way that a statement such as is one of the greatest porn actresses in recent history might be or even say what her claimed favourite sexual positions are I would recommend making the source of the information more explicit by saying something such as according to her official website That way the claim is entirely factual her website does indeed say that and readers can then judge for themselves whether or not they find it plausible