I have swapped it for a more specific and less obstrusive maintenance template Two of the reviews remarked on the lack of compatibility with various Nikon cameras because the camera body interferes with the shifting mechanism I don t think we currently mention that we probably should Regarding your sandbox draft That still needs some work I believe It seems written for a specialist not for a general audience For example the very first paragraph talks about the R68 s more modern looking front fender more modern compared to what Also the second paragraph s fender description is much better in that it describes the changes instead of just calling them more modern which is rather vague I m also skeptical of the rather long quotes We should probably rewrite that in our own words especially as the two quotes are partly redundant The draft also says it s the most desirable postwar BMW motorcycle That s a rather subjective statement and would require attribution to a secondary source Historian reviewer whatever Smith called it the most desirable postwar BMW motorcycle otherwise it s editorializing which we should not engage in On your user page you call it the rarest and most valuable which should be much easier to find sources for I m no expert on motorcycles and the people at WikiProject Motorcycling may give you more specific advice