I removed it because it really seems to be trying to make into an issue his participation in the general nation wide observation of a major anniversary I am not convinced there is anything unique in his role there Also I wonder if we were showing truly unacceptable biases by not refering to them as the Malvinas in an article on an Argentine Also it feels like drawing us into what is essentially a news story people trying to make some British angle in the new Pope and not of permanent encyclopedic value