Mrpainkiller Neurophyte and Jean Philippe After a complaint at intervention against vandalism I protected the article VampireFreaks com It was either that or block all of you for disruption and personal attacks I will unprotect the article in the morning In the meantime please consider the following Reverting another user s talk page is pretty rude There is a policy conflict between the user talk page policy which says users can blank or archive warnings although archiving is preferred by the community and the vandalism policy which says that removing warnings given to you is vandalism I don t agree with the vandalism point of view and I haven t seen a lot of support for it lately except among people who are fighting amongst themselves for other reasons If someone deletes a warning they ve obviously seen it If you are concerned about someone s edits use a verbose edit summary so that even if the warning is removed the edit summary will be visible I understand there is a view among two of you that Mrpainkiller7 s edits are detrimental to the article There are lots of right ways to deal with this including editing by consensus Request for comment on the article or the user Mediation and third opinion I m not going to judge the content but fighting wherever it occurs is the wrong way to deal with the problem Personal attacks are not to be tolerated Please deal with the content of edits not character I m leaving this message with each of you If you keep fighting over talk pages I suppose I or another admin will eventually figure it s time to block someone Unless you are positive that you are 100 right and the other guy is 100 wrong you should probably try and work this out peacefully in case the admins don t see things your way