Many reliable sources a great deal mentioned in this article clearly link NAMBLA to pro pedophile activism and a group for pedophiles Even the term boylover on WP currently redirects to Pedophilia as it stands Whether you do or not view NAMBLA as pedophilic is your own view Wikipedia does not allow for original research and fringe viewpoints must not be given a false balance with the mainstream views For example David Thorstads views on pederasty and homosexuality would be considered fringe Obviously subject matters such as NAMBLA can be contentious issues and as such it s often difficult to make articles like this neutral That being said I think that it would help if this article went more into the broader historical context of NAMBLA in terms of pro pedophile or pro pederast activism in the United States and their relationship with the broader LGBT community From what I can tell most sources focus on the political aspect of NAMBLA especially its aim to abolish the age of consent altogether The controversial aspect of NAMBLA means that we have to be very careful when adding information to the article and it also means that there are very few unbiased reporting a of the organisation which makes it difficult to be neutral on these topics If you have any information provided it is reliably sourced and explicitly mentions NAMBLA I d appreciate your input email