Haminoon No my edit wasn t redundant Here s why My addition of child to child sexual abuse indicates that the victim in question was under the age of consent But the fact that the age was given as 15 doesn t inform the reader what the age of consent was in the jurisdiction in question Unless the reader was already aware of the age of consent in Oregon he wouldn t know that sex with a 15 year old counted legally speaking as a specific level of offense in that state In any case I was following the instructions in the page Sexual Abuse when I added that word child You didn t explain why you felt that rule was inappropriate to follow