Peer Review 3 Odexed Thanks for assisting in the improvement for the article Odex s actions against file sharing and please accept my apologies for the previous lack of response and edits due to dealing with real life issues I m pleased to let you know that the third PR for the article is now up and looking forward to hearing feedback from you so that it can be brought over to FAC soon Best regards Is Google Making Us Stupid Hey Still working from your GA review I just tackled an important portion of it the section on memory retention It looks like it will be an important part of Carr s forthcoming book The Shallows Mind Memory and Media in an Age of Instant Information so I m glad you pushed me to improve this section It was definitely in hindsight quite pitiful Hi Sko Happy holidays I ve addressed all of your points I think they are many and I will of course continue to go back to them and I thank you for them and I was wondering if you had further points to make I hope to open up a peer review request soon enough and I would welcome even further comments from you there I don t think the article is yet FA material but it is heading there I think Hello MS great work on the review so far I ve just added my initial comments on the Themes and motifs section Let me know if these nitpicking points are helpful I had been planning to go through the whole article line by line in this fashion then actually look at the arguments and coverage of the topic itself in the article before examining the article against the GA criteria but if you re looking to move things along quickly it might be best for me to give a GA review soon It is becoming an excellent candidate for FA Your reviews are very helpful I doubt I will get any better at peer review For some reason over 400 people were reading the article last Friday so I m glad I have ironed out some of the errors I hope you will continue to help me out I can t have any mistakes in this article or I will be internationally roasted PS Please continue to do the full analysis that you intended I am looking forward to it I think you could be a professional editor if you have not already been one I shudder to think how this article might have gone if it weren t for your review I m still working on the Themes section but should be finished with everything pretty soon Want to apologize Good morning Skomorokh we had conversations at I am apologizing for the confusion about the category comment and the way I responded to you which was uncivil at least by the standards I myself require when I comment to other editors I do realize that categories can not be put into articles willy nilly I misunderstood your comment apparently and thought you were saying that a reference was required on the category in order to insert it into an article I have commented at Verbal s and apologized there for this confusion also but I want to make sure that you saw this so I am repeating it here You came off to me as very combative which brought out the bad response from me plus I was tired and have medical problems but this is no excuse for me to have responded as I did to you Please except my apology and explanation if you would though of course you don t have to it would mean a lot to me to know you understand why I said what I did I would like to also disclose that I corrected the spelling of my name as the spelling of Crohn s is kind of like a pet peeve to me I hope this was ok to do I don t usually adjust other editors comments but I was having trouble typing to you with the knowledge that it was still there Anyways I hope this clears the air and things are ok now I take pride in being civil and not being rude to someone or allowing my emotions to take over like it did h