No you got it wrong We have sources criticising the report and per WP FRINGE and indeed WP NPOV the policy from which WP FRINGE is derived including uncritical material on the report while not also including the criticism from qualified scientists is contrary to policy We are having an ongoing discussion here as to what we should include and as is noted above the most significant criticism so far comes from Uppsala University in Swedish Given the controversy regarding the E Cat it would seem important to ensure that this material is accurately translated which has yet to be done And for the record this is not a newspaper there is no deadline and an unseemly rush to include news does little for the credibility of the article Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia rather than part of Rossi s publicity machine and we are under no obligation to assist him in his quest to promote his device accordingly we will take whatever time is required to come to a consensus regarding any content concerning this latest report Article quality is what matters not whether we report every last breathless detail