I have not formally protested contested this particular topic ban as I think others can do that better What I raised was a disturbing implication which is nothing less than censorship Now it should be noted that I do allow for some restrictions censorship in regards of pornography copyright violations etc These are definite previously identified subjects however blurry they may be around the edges which can be cast as particular exceptions to general free speech And it should also be noted as I stated on the noticeboard that I am not coming from any notion of individual rights or such my concern is whether Wikipedia is self limiting in respect of what can be discussed This especially concerns me when discussion or editors is restricted on the claim of maintaining order which is precisely what you have claimed above and previously And just what totalitarian regimes claim Your initial statement that was certain discussions could not be held on the talk pages were best held elsewhere Which turns out to be nowhere on Wikipedia And now you explicitly deny participation to blocked editors I thought we were discussing topic banned editors but perhaps this is immaterial seeing that WMC was blocked for saying nothing At any rate what I see is an editor being banned blocked for some very petty arbitrary reasons This has all the earmarks of invidious censorship and I have yet to see what is misunderstood