This thread is an additional argument in favour of moving part of the content into the mother article The terminology section is a pure coatrack because it discussed terminology for mass killings not for Communist mass killings This is as ridiculous as to have e g a Chronology section in the Battle of Kursk article which started with the words no generally accepted date for start of WWII exist in historic literature The terminology section definitely belongs to the Mass killings article not to this one Even Semelin discusses leftists calssicide not Communist classicide Yes Semelin and Rosenfielde speak mostly about Communism so these two sources may be used as a source to demonstrate that these two scholars attempted to develop a terminology for Communist mass killings With regard to all other sources they definitely do belong to the main article not to this one