7 September 2010 UTC Let me react here as the talk page is already closed Actually there is nothing personal and there is no attack in the sentence so it could be hardly a personal attack and Destinero has actually long record of REAL personal attacks incl personally targeted nasty words on Czech version of Wikipedia against me and others His attempts to get me down are endless unsucessfull arbitrary on cz Wikipedia crazy letters to Jimbo Wales here etc It is not true that I had months of silence just to write this I made lot of edits there Czech Wikipedia in between and I accidentally look into the article to check out the source on English Wikipedia and I did see that if Destinero is blocked on Czech version he just continues in his edit wars here Take it as my apology that for example in Holand pedophiles tries to get into the term of Sexual orientation they establish their own political party and request their own rights If you look on it from social political viewpoint there is almost no difference between situation of this party and beginning of the pro homosexual movement in the last century Additionally pedophiles tries to ban zoofiles see the pedo Party rules from their space in comparison of homosexuals tried to ban pedophiles from their space self evidently the term sexual orientation Reason why is that definition of what is sexual orientation or preference vary in time and depend on point of view and this is the core matter of the problem THIS IS A FACT not an attack Some homosexuals can see that as a danger for their rights but it is not me who is dangerous for them but the pedophiles and because all this up is a FACT it is still OK to speak about that IF not homosexual censorship takes a lead same as Destinero promotes just his own point of view and deletes all others as wrong 20 30