I might as well include the issue since Casprings did not This has been a problem and in the article for some time The way Casprings has it worded and has defended vigorously makes a statement which implies a statement Mourdock did not make became embroiled in a similar controversy when he stated that pregnancy from rape was something God intended This clearly implies that Mourdock thinks that God intends that pregancy is the result of a rape However that is not what he said He clearly says that if a pregnancy is the result of a rape then God indended that life to happen I know there are some who disagree and I respect their point of view but I believe that life begins at conception The only exception I have to have an abortion is in that case of the life of the mother I just struggled with it myself for a long time but I came to realize Life is that gift from God that I think even if life begins in that horrible situation of rape that it is something that God intended to happen Frankly I am not even sure why this has to be debated