original research Lambert the world s foremost expert in the cuneiform says Grayson s translation is not valid and other scholars have confirmed Lambert s assertion You are pushing a FALSE TRANSLATION that is unacceptable You stopped assuming good faith with the opposing editors a long time ago bit I continued to give you the benefit of the doubt but now it s becoming more clear to me that you re not interested in factual accuracy or building an encyclopedia your intentions seem to be political Given your persistence in defending and using false martial which compromise the integrity of Wikipedia I am willing to go all the way to the ArbCom with you I will get professor Lambert to directly contact ArbCom should his testimony be needed