Hi Lembazza just dropping you a note to say that I agree WALL E is a an animated adventure with romantic overtones and a sci fi theme whereas by contrast Space Jam is a comedy Not just any website will do has to be something wiki reliable which passes the wiki rules With movies for instance you would want a source like Roger Ebert Here we go Thus we can say with a straight face in wikipedia s voice that WALL E is in fact a family oriented animated adventure film a tale of science fiction It is not in short a comedy nor a comedy Reading further and deeper this is no accident Ebert never mentions humour humor laughs laughing jokes joking funny amusing or comedy comedy anywhere in the review He talks about many other things but never strays from his basic stance that WALL E is a sci fi adventure film with romantic undercurrents Now of course there are other WP SOURCES out there which do say the WALL E is a comedy flat out The movie is pretty humourous so you can see where these other sources got it wrong But the question for wikipedia is not which sources got it right and which got it wrong wikipedia should simply reflect what the sources say And in this case some sources say animated adventure and some say animated comedy The correct outcome is for the article to explain to the readership that according to Roger Ebert the film is an adventure with a sci fi story ref 1 but according to SomeOtherSource the film is a comedy with a sci fi story ref 2 Make sense Technologically there are some limits on how categories work on wiki so it is not always possible to make them nuanced and in particular films which are in more than one category intersecting are very hard to get right and cause a lot of drama and reverting WALL E is a funny movie so maybe it belongs in the comedy category but it is also undeniably an adventure movie so it certainly belongs in the adventure category and because categories are a weak spot in our server programming this is not always possible to accomplish cf Category list of nationalityGoseHere ethnicityGoeshere genderGoesHere historicalEraGoesHere genreGoesHere novelists which is a HUGE problem nowadays because people are over categorizing like crazy Sometimes one source is not enough to convince the other wikipedians Holler at them Nah just get more sources Adventure Epic Saga Romance Well maybe the sources are contradictory and this film is many things It will take some time before wikipedia gets this right because it is complicated But eventually the goal is for wikipedia to get it right So take the time to get it right but do it right nicely not screamy In any case you seem to be a sensible wikipedian with some good ideas so I hope you ll consider sticking around p s Of course your block by Kudpung was not really incorrect you have been warned a few times and you were not listening to the warnings Indef means simply until you are willing to listen The specific generic rational of not here was obviously wrong Kudpung probably meant not here AT THE MOMENT but we have a specific wiki jargon for that which is to block for general disruptiveness Deleting stuff in anger namecalling that stuff not wiki kosher If you wanna be a wikipedian you got ta be polite To everyone at all times even when especially when they are NOT being very civil to you It is easy once you get the hang of it Just stick to commenting on the sources and the contents of