stating that See also sections are only useful when they are being deleted and if the article has lots of links it does nt need a see also section is not correct WP See also is clear about See also sections being beneficial and when they should be used An article having a lot of links doesn t mean that it shouldn t have a See also section Often the See also section contains links that should be in the body of the article So instead of removing a See also section as you did in this recent case which brought me to this Alzheimer s disease discussion when looking at your latest contributions you should be seeing how you can incorporate those links into the body of the article Other times a See also section has links that are only indirectly related to the topic of the article and per WP See also this is fine