With regard to A3 the article 1 has content That s really weird I highlighted the relevant portions of the template text so you wouldn t be confused yet you still cite the irrelevent sections as if they had some sort of connection with what I wrote Maybe this confusion is related to your irrelevant application of vanity bio standards to something which was not and has never been claimed by myself to be a vanity bio It also casts doubt on your ability to recognize whether something clearly is not a speedy candidate no For some object lessons see Wikipedia Deletion review Gigi Stone Wikipedia Deletion review John Scherer the article is not linked from anywhere else A sure sign of the subject s importance eh Time for a sing along Every sperm is sacred Every sperm is great If a sperm is wasted God gets quite irate