I don t support weasel wording but you have been and are basically rejecting the whole idea behind keeping the article unbiased just because of a piece of phrase that was poorly worded It would be better if you tried to understand why the current version needs a change and help us make this change happen We have to have a clear equal sided reference or keep the whole reference and topic out either way this version of the article is unacceptable Reading through the whole section there isn t even a reference to any other deaths in WW1 besides this globally controversial Armenian Genocide How did this even make it into the article It s not up to us wikipedians to do the historian s jobs and argue what is true and what not we are just here to pass on information with correct wording and citation If we don t have enough facts then we should just drop the whole topic especially in such a featured article This motion is neither denial nor approval of the Armenian Genocide I ve described the situation in my previous posts as well and am still after more than half a month requesting any Wikipedia Administrator to do something about this