Binders and women See and for this change Opinion pieces such as the Guardian column by Ana Marie Cox are primary source material This is not in any way the same as a lexicographer noting that a term has become current in English Rather it is a pundit using a term which is obviously detrimental and critical at the expense of a political candidate Which makes this a violation of WP NPOV Aside from that it has been less than 12 hours since the coinage of this supposedly new term See Wikipedia Wikipedia is not for things made up one day and WP NOT NEWS When a Wikipedia editor finds example of usage of a term and uses those to build a case that X is a term for Y that is original research and it violates the policy WP NOR What you need is a reliable source which actually says X is a term for Y The first is an example of an editor playing amateur lexicographer the second is an example of what we mean by verifiability