Disruptive edits The material I added to Cyrillic was directly taken from a standard philological source I added back the mention about Denisona after she decided as a lone wolf authority to undo my proper edit Do y all have nothing better to do than concoct problems that don t exist and then threaten contributors about them I see that in many other cases nothing but a generic This article has issues with unsourced material warning is slapped up but when I cite chapter and verse some wacko complains about it Please respond in ADULT THOUGHTFULLY ARGUED fashion