Sorry but you re just passing the buck on your own actions You re the one reverting the changes issuing ultimatums and invoking nonexistent consensuses to support what you would prefer If we re going to talk about surreptitious content dropping we can look at your edits where you removed the established material while claiming it was the duplicate content added in the merge However this conversation and AGF convince me that this was less intentional dodging than it was you not paying attention to what you re doing As far as conceding uh what I already explained that most of your change to the wording was fine and it s still in the article Literally the only issue is that pointless and distracting quote in the citation you re so fixated on Even after all of this you still haven t clearly explained why it s so important that you re holding up all other changes over it It doesn t sound like you know yourself considering your current argument is totally different than what you said yesterday Moving material wholecloth without changes simply isn t possible without just dumping a bunch of redundant material into the Tropes article considering much of it is already there and has been for months Like it or not we re going to have to make editorial decisions on what to say We certainly shouldn t be replacing better material with worse material for the sake of arbitrarily making a closed transaction