The discussion you link to is not about the photograph so I m not sure what your point is You appear to be upset that in the photograph Ludwik is wearing a military uniform which you don t particularly enjoy looking at Wellllll maybe you should take that up with the person who took the photo I mean I really don t know what to tell you here You seem to be saying that the photograph was taken in some nefarious POV way but given when it was taken before WW2 that sort of doesn t make any sense As to the BRD yes you quoted BRD at me in your edit summary After you reverted twice Without discussing the issue which is actually relevant instead trying to get your way by claiming the photograph was a copyvio And after I already discussed did the D on talk The progression of changes suggests that you are either not quite clear on what BRD means or you are just quoting it randomly to get your way Now if you read the guideline not policy carefully it turns out that follow BRD does not actually mean don t you dare revert me motherfucker It means be bold revert discuss So maybe you should try following some of these steps yourself rather than mindlessly quoting policy Finally as to the there is no consensus for the inclusion of this photograph That seems to be a different way of saying IIIraute don t like the photograph IIIraute remove I m not the only one who put the photo in the article You are confusing WP IDONTLIKEIT with WP CONSENSUS in a way which very strongly suggests a problem with WP OWN on your part in regard to this article The photo illustrates the subject matter though you ve been trying to remove as much as you can of that too and hence is relevant and useful to the purpose of the article People quote Consensus all the time when they actually seem to mean I get to have my way But just like BRD is not what you think it actually is consensus is not a divine right to veto any change you don t like