Thanks as you can imagine I am finding it very hard going on my own getting quite disheartened actually knowing that the delegates are waiting to close it and did wonder if there was any light at the end of the tunnel I am on the verge of giving up on it unfortunately which would be a shame after all the great work that has gone into it by several editors recently it really was quite a mess not so long ago I think this article deserved to be put straight perhaps borne from a desire to fix the many many innaccuracies in it that crept in over the years You started off with a positive introduction but now seem to be becoming ever more critical I correct something and you find something else This may or may not be intentional but it is what I see is happening after all comments might have been actioned there was no guarantee that your comment would turn to a support exactly as the first reviewer did asked me questions I answered and in some cases altered the article then he didn t bother to strike his answered questions or to say why they had not been struck I also seem to be getting lectures on NPOV in particular I understand the policy and try to follow it and pride myself on being able to remain neutral and to create articles the same way if genuine NNPOV material exists there still then it is not intentional If Kreindler was indeed a bad guy for instance and it was reported at the time that he was then we can t say he was a good guy or leave his involvement out he gets mentioned a lot in references as I guess his manner upset people the rest of the trial seemed to be quite unremarkable and so apparently did not get highlighted There is no Anglo American bias either from myself I know it happens on WP sometimes It might seem biased in the trial section as he was an American operating in a British court so the bias is from the British press if he was any other nationality doing the same thing then I expect that it would have been reported the same way I have not used the phrase I disagree on that page but it is probably apparent that I do not agree with some of your views I note that you are an admin so you have one up on me there but as editors we should treat each other as equals even if I am not the sharpest tool in the box I note that we have both remained very civil something I like to see and believe in quite strongly Edit conflict We should try to keep comments and answers down in length if I continue to persevere with it it s getting very difficult to navigate the FAC page now and I don t believe that we are allowed to collapse any of it into shells or even add arbitrary editing breaks it s some kind of strange FAC team rule that I did know once but have now forgotten I have to go out tonight so apologies for appearing to go silent Thanks for posting a note here I thought that you would at some stage I really do have to go out now else I will get in trouble Cheers