I ve had a look at Talk Lurgan and to be honest I don t think you have a case Yes the timing suggests that he came upon the Lurgan article via your contributions page but the edit itself looks like a good faith edit and the discussion on the talk page is fairly typical of the editor and his worldview It doesn t seem to me either that the edit would adversely affect your GA nomination whether or not you personally agree with the edit In short one instance and especially where the editor follows BRD can t really be called hounding The trouble with taking it further is that if you can t show obvious disruption it may be you that ends up being branded as disruptive I would take Angus s advice and let it go