Headers for the history section William s version History Before the Fleischmann Pons experiment Fleischmann Pons experiment Subsequent research My version History Early research Fleischmann Pons experiment Subsequent research I prefer the second version of the headers because they are briefer and more aesthetic The second version of the headers convey the exact same information as the first however the second version also has brevity and internal symmetry Little details are important in making a great article for example n dashes instead of hyphens correct placement of images simple wording non repetitiveness etc In this case the second version of the headers have a nice internal symmetry the Early research header reflects off the Fleischmein Pons experiment and gives the symmetric Subsequent research The other version of the headers unfortunately appears to the reader as clumsy and wordy And wordiness is something that this article definitely needs to cut down on That is why the removal of a repetitive sentence in the above discussion was good More is not better If something is being repeated or overly wordy it should be pared down