Debbie what exactly are you doing with the archives If you continue on this path assuming the page is not deleted we will have a long list of archive links some of which are minor Why not just archive via the standard archive method Arzel It s a topical archive Wikipedia allows for either a chronological archive or a topical archive Personally I prefer a topical archive as it makes old discussions easier to find Wikipedia How to archive a page Detailed explanation You should also make chronological archives so that threads appear both chronologically and topically It d make reviewing them easier depending on why you want to read old archives conduct vs content To be irritating as may be my habit heh people seem to think the poll I set up immediately above is a bit I think we should tend to question in specific a single fellow editor or group of fellow editors with suspicion about who edited commented c what when where how not on the article s talkpage but if necessary 1 on each others talkpages if we ve good enough mutual rapport or else especially if not 2 on certain of WP s many applicable bulletin board pages So instead of saying Arzel WTF or Debbie whatintheheck we would simply say addressing nobody in particular Hey do you other editors think we should choose x option or y option Although I may not make a lot of sense Been up all night Strike comment Titling and organizing an archive by an editor s name Material removed by Arzel seems nasty at best North8000 As requested I added a chronological archive OK can you now delete the links to the topical archive This page is blatant political smear