As a devotee of the show I happen to completely agree with Masem There is nothing inherently POV about including positive or negative perceptions of the show and while there are probably better sources on the subject than Breitbart s piece to say that criticizing something as weird is totally out of Wikipedia s standards is grossly inaccurate of the nature of wikipedia Number one Wikipedia is not censored As the article stands now Ms magazine basically called Princess Celestia an allusion to white supremacy so I don t see how calling bronies weird would be in any way unacceptable in wikipedia standards Secondly in terms of WP WEIGHT one or two statements on how the brony phenomenon is unappealing to some doesn t even overwhelm the section let alone the entire article The National review is a reliable source which comments on Breitbart s blog even though I wouldn t consider Breitbart s blog noteworthy in and of itself If there is to be inclusion on negative perceptions it should come from more reputable sources But to say any source which labels the show or its fanbase as weird or creepy is unacceptable is ludicrous