Uh AND Anthony Romero and James Jaffer of ACLU cited making observation that are pure opinion But who s counting Also I don t see how the inclusion of only 2 columnists is somehow acceptable But while I do see that I overstated the extent to which this entry relied on opinion I feel it s still substantially infected with it and I don t think that s accidental I think it reflects the fact that the intention of most of the authors is to use this as part of either an indictment of how the US has conducted the war on terror or as a platform to vent their anger over the incidents There are plenty of other places on the internet to do those things I just don t think wikipedia is one of them