Bruce Metzger I m new to Wiki so pls be patient As a committed Christian I am keen to see that the truth is conveyed to seekers hence my additions to the Bruce Metzger article re his leaning to Westcott Hort Is this a personal point of view I don t think so but would appreciate feedback discussion on how to best expand the content around well know commentators such as Metzger who clearly follow a certain biblical view BTW I am working on the citations that have been requested I will ensure these are added or the the text will be edited accordingly Kindly Andrew Sydney Hi and welcome again I edited your new paragraph on W H because it did not seem to me to be in conformace with the policies and guidelines here particularly WP NPOV and WP WEASEL I think I kept the essentials while making it more neutral If you disagree let s talk about how we can improve it on Talk Bruce Metzger Colin Tilsley I d like a little more help with understanding why the new text for Colin Tilsley was removed please I ve read through numerous policies around POV and I appreciate that there will be some overlap especially coming from a family member But being a family member doesn t preclude me from submitting factual commentary surely If I had a different username would that have made a difference Wiki would be the worse for it if so My family interest aside C Tilsley was a significant individual in the growth of missionary evangelical work throughout Europe and Asia so I wish to add as much content as possible BTW I could not find a specific policy on commenting on family I responded at Re my talk page When you are fighting vandalism please do not target everything from the same IP address Yes someone has made a few vandalisms from my IP but in stopping them you also reverted my legitimate edits and gave me warnings which I don t deserve See my response at In regards to your revert of 70 53 92 224 s edit on Blood alcohol content wouldn t it have been better to fix his her code than revert to an inaccurate statement and accuse him her of vandalism If I had reason to believe that s he was not vandalizing as s he did to other articles then I would have tried to fix it As it was on cursory inspection I did not see what s he was trying to refer to and the user had a history so I just deleted it Ex Cathedra statements are not new revelations According to the Catholic Church Ex Cathedra statements are not new revelations but a more clear explanation of revelation Please see Catechism of the Catholic Church 66 67 online at 66 The Christian economy therefore since it is the new and definitive Covenant will never pass away and no new public revelation is to be expected before the glorious manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ 28 Yet even if Revelation is already complete it has not been made completely explicit it remains for Christian faith gradually to grasp its full significance over the course of the centuries 67 Throughout the ages there have been so called private revelations some of which have been recognized by the authority of the Church They do not belong however to the deposit of faith It is not their role to improve or complete Christ s definitive Revelation but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history Guided by the Magisterium of the Church the sensus fidelium knows how to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church Christian faith can not accept revelations that claim to surpass or correct the Revelation of which Christ is the fulfilment as