I m not vandalizing your talk page I m just trying to set things right No you re just trying to push things in the wrong direction and vandalize You added the word FAG in place of the show titles on the article Or rather faag That s the real name of the show What else would a show with those characters be called No they re not the actual titles Did you even watch any of the shows For example not GayPants Squarepants GayPants is its name NOT Square pants the character has gay pants not square They are actually a rectangular prism if you want to get technical Simple as that As I ve said before DID YOU EVEN WATCH ANY OF THE SHOWS NO you didn t say it before and yes I have watched them before Have you Yes I have The recent ones do suck But they don t go by the titles you put down Also if by chance I am a vandal then by that logic so is right And how can pants be gay That doesn t make sense Unless they were rainbow but they re not Pants can be gay by having a gay look to them like how homosexuals buy certain clothing and have a certain style It makes perfect sense if you think about it Also they don t have to be rainbow to be gay either As a final question what do you know about FACTS and OPINIONS I know that shows that are of low quality like the new Nickelodeon shows can not ever be popular That s the FACTS I also know that people are pushing and protecting THEIR OPINION about the new Nickelodeon shows being popular on that page They don t look gay to me Just shut up Maybe not to you So just shut up yourself already okay All right the conversation is officially OVER now Why are you even on my talk page anyways Because I m an idiot and you keep baiting me I thought this conversation was already over P