Paragraph 6 is offensive States no proof of signs being hung but that academic paper states they found 2 instances in the NYT classifieds If 2 classifieds were found to believe not one single sign was hung on a window is ridiculous no I mean stupid and offensive Not to argue with Jensen s paper but you can site David Duke and many anti Holocaust papers so what s your point Also as common sense it happened in Canada but we were spared Come on To say it was maybe anti catholic not anti Irish you want to split hairs How about the cartoons of the day characterizing the Irish with monkey attributes The caring concerned Protestants sited in Jensen s article building factory s for the Irish to work in and hiring Irish women as domestic help as some kind of proof against discrimination is way off I want to go to the slavery section and see how your twisted mind glorifies that I guess the Irish were lucky to be able to build the railroad with the Chinese and compete with the Negro s for jobs This section needs a big RED FLAG In closing when this encyclopedia starts saying the Holocaust never happened and slavery helped the blacks that is when it looses all credibility not just most One paper is not scholarship You stupid ignorant fools