Again I m not saying that this subject isn t inherently interesting or that it s not notable and should be deleted I m saying the way the article is written isn t very interesting As it is it can be broken down into Woodbridge was born to this family Family details Woodbridge went to these schools joined these clubs and earned these degrees Woodbridge became a pastor Woodbridge became a professor and taught these subjects Woodbridge became a dean and then a president Woodbridge retired Woodbridge married and raised a family Woodbridge died and was buried One quote on his personality A list of works This is fine for an ordinary article but doesn t have anything else to pull the reader in I m pretty sure an ordinary reader would be left wondering why this particular figure is notable As a basic example he wrote a lot but what did he write about I don t think a list of titles suffices Essentially I think for biographical articles some sense of how the subjects were influential is needed at least I didn t mean to make a personal attack of any kind if Wikipedia were to get rid of its articles on obscure or dry subjects it wouldn t be the same or as useful But if FAs are supposed to be the best work of Wikipedia I have a hard time seeing how something this bare bones can compare with the sort of stuff I mentioned in terms of writing quality and depth of research