Alleged vandalism If someone can explain to the Wiki community why a fellow Wikipedian would characterize as vandalism a minor stylistic edit which added information to the encyclopedia and which noted its raison d etre and justification by referring relevantly to WP WEASEL in the edit summary that would do all editors an instructive service More precisely the reference to WP WEASEL relates to the Wikipedia Weasel Other problems section on passive voice which states the problem is not the grammatical legitimacy of the passive voice as much as the fact that it is designed to permit the omission of exactly who or what is behind the words or actions in question