It appears the current consensus is that without new sources indicating otherwise our present wording is accurate As indicated above that the majority of scientists who talk about it are supportive says very little Most people who talk about alien abductions probably believe in those too It would be a waste of time otherwise That the biological and zoological communities as a whole discount the existence of Bigfoot says more about the majority view on the subject A proper reliable source contending that wording would indicate there s significant disagreement within those communities Peer reviewed papers by zoologists for example would be helpful