Consensus was achieved The two editors still involved in the discussion reached a consensus based on Wikipedia policy and guidelines That other people added to the discussion weeks afterward does not negate the fact that a consensus was achieved If there are only two editors discussing an edit then any agreement they reach that is within the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia is always considered a consensus I ve asked you once before to point out where this is contradicted in any Wikipedia policy or guideline It isn t There is not a single personal attack coming from me You used an insulting tone and threatened me so I bowed out of the discussion because I no longer wish to be subject to your bullying efforts in an article I care absolutely nothing about These are facts You edit warred against consensus were insulting and threatened me Therefore there is absolutely nothing for me to redact You continually telling me to redact comments and or edits however is of concern and is part of the exact same pattern of discourse you ve used throughout this incident Since I have not once personally attacked you your comment at the end was yet another snide comment coming from you directed at me