Okay Montanabw is being clear in admitting that they are siding with others against me not on the merits but to make a point and to attempt to silence me personally This editor clearly needs to read WP GANG WP POINT WP HARASS and WP ARBATC including its prohibition on personalizing article title debates about which Montanabw was formally notified the day before they posted this I ve already suggested on Montanabw s own talk page to be amenable to WP Dispute resolution the proper venue for this stuff Yet Montanabw just made it unmistakeably certain that this is a personal dispute for them not a discussion about the merits of these renames so they are disrupting WP RM to pursue a personality conflict even after it s been pointed out that this is what they re doing It has to stop There is no my way that I m insisting on We have clear article title policies and I ve made moves that conform to them accepted some criticism for doing so without discussion and now we re having that very discussion which seems to be going the way I suggested anyway since it s the way based on policy not my way or Montanbw s way Other moves I ve requested on a policy basis not some random personal preference mind you almost invariably also are accepted see for just one month s stats in which my RM actions are in predicting move or don t move outcome Montanabw is conflating a their previous unrelated article titling personal disputes with me in some of which they were correct about that content while I was in others b an ANI resolved over two months ago about move process not content in which Montanabw was involved and b the substance content not process of the moves in question now These are three topics Montanabw muddying the waters of the ongoing proceeding and doing so again in ways that demonstrate they don t understand how RM works at WP AN on the basis of my alleged personality is the fallacy ad hominem and a sterling example of a WP NPA violation Montanabw has already had way more than enough warnings in that regard