22 December 2006 UTC I m disappointed that you would characterise this as a pissing match and the only viewpoint I am interested in advancing is that of objectivity Nothing among the diversity on my talk page past or present has any bearing on this matter On the whole your last post seems to be mostly an attack on me and my supposed motives There s no need or justification for such seeming personal rancour Certainly I do not feel any Please don t take personal offence at this or any editorial disagreement between us if that is what has happened The problem I see here is that this article is a fork Although forks multiply the number of articles they do not help to build the web but interfere with its good structure I ve considered at length the reasons that this article is a fork in my last post I hope that you will be willing likewise to consider the matter dispassionately and to reply in kind In the end we may still disagree but there is no good reason that we can not do so and yet remain cordial The thoughts of other editors are of course most welcome by me so at least we agree on one thing whereas the concept of consensus hardly applies to only two people Sincerely 21 39