Star Trek canon vs Star Trek canon OK this is getting silly It s an incredibly trivial edit to get into an edit war over so let s be civilized Here s what the Wikipedia guide to writing better articles has to say about the principle of least astonishment Principle of least astonishment Using the principle of least astonishment you should plan your pages and links so that everything appears reasonable and makes sense If a link takes readers to somewhere other than where they thought it would it should at least take them someplace that makes sense Example A user wants to know about the nuclear power plant that exploded in Chernobyl The page on Chernobyl redirects to Chornobyl an alternative spelling for that town However the user sees that a link to the desired page Chernobyl accident is placed prominently near the top of the Chornobyl page and happily clicks on that It s true that an editor who saw a link saying Star Trek canon might subsequently type a link as Star Trek canon However such an editor would quickly realize their mistake just as E Pluribus Anthony did within two minutes It s Wikipedia style to italicize titles of television series so the link should say Star Trek canon even though the article is rightly at Star Trek canon I don t see what s wrong with using the piped link here