Langus Wikipedia policy mandates that articles should be self contained If an assertion is used in an article both the assertion and its use must be justified in that article The assertion that Britain re established its rule has never been made in scholarly texts and is a WP FRINGE theory Jimbo Wales has stated If a viewpoint is in the majority then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority then it should be easy to name prominent adherents If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small or vastly limited minority it does not belong in Wikipedia regardless of whether it is true or not and regardless of whether you can prove it or not except perhaps in some ancillary article We have not been provided with citations to either reference texts or prominent authors supporting the viewpoint that Britain re established its rule in 1833 Therefore the claim does not belong in Wikipedia In your discussions with WCM he just muddled the waters by taking the debate to whether it is true or not that Britain ruled the islands before 1833 We need not delve into that The only thing that matters here is if the reliable sources available support that view And the reliable sources by an OVERWHELMING majority sorry for the caps but I NEED to stress that support the view that the 1833 events were an occupation