The idea of releases deserving images is a little strange The question is whether the image increases reader understanding of the topic in a significant way The fact that the tracklisting is different does not make the cover any more important Take one of my articles Over the Rainbow Connie Talbot album a featured article This has been rereleased several times in different countries and at different times some with different tracklistings Though the releases are significant and so are discussed the covers are not what the cover looked like with these releases is not important enough to be mentioned in the article text and so it certainly isn t important enough to use a non free image which should as per our non free content guidelines be used very sparingly to illustrate I repeat what is the use of the cover actually illustrating