Bogus reference makes bogus claims This from one of the references It is stated that the Gundam Pilots names originate from numbers 1 5 apart from Heero whose codename is related to a colonial peacekeeper in the story Hiiro could be derived from the Japanese word hito which can mean one Duo is a modern spelling of the Latin dvo meaning two a partner Quatre is French for four and Wu in Wufei is the pronunciation of five in Chinese and the Chinese translation of his name is meaning Five Fly If this is true it would also be reasonable for Trowa to originally be Triton as Triton consists of one proton and two neutrons three together suggesting Trowa to be number three trois trwa in French This is blatant OR the person who concocted it is really reaching to make connections between unconnected things and admits it In addition the statement apart from Heero whose codename is related to a colonial peacekeeper in the story is immediately contradicted by the next sentence Hiiro could be derived from the Japanese word hito which can mean one You can t have it both ways either the character name is not a number or it is The phrases It is stated If this is true and it would be reasonable are blatant weasel words It is not reasonable by any understanding of etymology to suggest a relationship or common meaning between the invented word trowa and the Greek word Triton The editor clearly does not even understand what Triton is a pretty grave sin since Wikipedia has an entire disambiguation page devoted to the word and none of the entries on that page has anything to do with an object that consists solely of one proton and two neutrons The only thing that remotely matches this description is tritium which has a nucleus consisting of one proton and two neutrons but no atom consists only of a nucleus Because this entire passage is unsourced subjective rationalization that proves nothing at all I am challenging it and removing it from the article