You might want to take a look at my proposal at Wikipedia talk Template messages User talk namespace Edit warring and breaking 3RR not always the same thing Seems you ve come a cropper from this template the same way I did Re River Song Thing is you seem to have misunderstood what I was trying to achieve by altering the prose text on River at Companion Doctor Who The idea was like with the Third Doctor s UNIT friends to state that she s sometimes considered a companion without asserting that she definitely is You ve changed it to read that she IS a companion which makes the whole section redundant If she s in the Eleventh Doctor table anything else can be expressed through footnotes as with other characters Incidentally the bottom paragraph doesn t read correctly since your edits but I am unable to change as I m not 100 on what your intended meaning is The problem is asserting that she s definitely a companion for series 6 presents difficulties The source only calls her a companion it doesn t specify any particular episodes and it s hard to use that to say she s a companion in series 6 but not 5 or 4 But conversely I don t think anyone considers it correct to call her a companion of the Tenth Doctor If she s in the table it means she has to be added to Template Eleventhdoctorcompanions and the articles for specific episodes and despite the slight narrative change I mentioned on the project page I don t feel there s really enough to distinguish between series 6 and her previous appearances That s why I feel that we should leave her off the companions list until she travels with the Doctor properly for want of a better term