Congratulations Congratulations on another great article Jayjg Read and enjoyed No comments this time Thanks I m still working on it adding detail and various interesting tidbits I m hoping to have it stable by tomorrow Improving citations Bar to promotion to GA until addressed Inasmuch as sentences will be inserted within paragraphs in between existing sentences that will not be covered by end of para footnotes the existing fact tags should not be removed until cites are supplied Furthermore where quotes are supplied there should always be a citation at the end of the sentence As has been explained multiple times citations are only required at the end of the set of sentences being cited or at the end of the paragraph if a paragraph end is reached This is the standard used in all Featured Articles and any Featured Article Candidate that used duplicate citations for every single sentence would either be fixed to remove them or rejected If you split a paragraph in some way either by inserting new information or creating a second paragraph then it s your responsibility to create the necessary duplicate citations by copying them from the end of the sentences or paragraphy If you need further clarification on this matter please ask at Wikipedia talk Featured article candidates First of all I would appreciate it if you were to not threaten me uncivilly as you did in your edit summary just now In addition to being uncivil your doing so also violates your wp admin obligations Your vitriol also suggests a failure to heed wp s guidance as to ownership of articles I ve corrected a host of MOS errors ce issues and grammar and provided new material supported by refs a tone of collaboration rather than muscle flexing about my article may perhaps be in order Second as has been explained to you multiple times the problem is that other editors will as I have already done today insert sentences in the middle of paragraphs This is of course normal When you fail to put a ref at the end of sentence 1 in a 2 sentence para and someone then inserts an un ref d sentence in between your two sentences there is no way for a reader or editor to know just looking at the refs whether the end of para ref supports sentence 1 new sentence 2 or neither Surely if this is not intuitive you recall it being explained to you in the past As has further been explained to you over time paras as they become larger are split as has already happened in this article But referencing the sentences properly you avoid the confusion that would otherwise attend the splitting of a para that would lead to the first half and new para being bereft of refs Surely this is intuitive In addition as has been explained to you sentences that contain quotes should definitely be ref d Furthermore where refs are absent and requested you should not remove the cite requested tag without providing a ref Which is what you have done Your hostility in your edit summary is unbecoming an admin a violation of wp civil and a violation of wp admin and please consider this a warning for both Kindly work at improving the article so that readers can know what material is referenced and what is not rather than engage in edit warring and incivility As has been explained already the standard is to put citations at the end of multiple sentences or paragraphs FA articles must do this The goal here is to get the article to FA quality not disqualify it by inappropriately citing every sentence and thereby dooming the candidacy If you split a paragraph then duplicate the citation If you need further clarification on this matter please ask at Wikipedia talk Featured article candidates Every step I ve taken is to improve the article I ve added pertinent text added refs added the spelling of the name that was not reflected corrected a number of MOS violations wp overlink violations gra