I and others have removed this link repeatedly since as I explained the first time I removed it the term is not commonly used to refer to alternative energy and the page alternative energy does not list free energy as a synonym explained all this most clearly on the talkpage on 01 30 July 21 2008 but that didn t stopped Gdewilde from reinserting the link an hour latter For the record since June and have also re inserted the link and myself and have removed it A single google search shows that free energy is a term used to describe alternative energy You are a liar Instances of your wp Tag team lie 85 000 000 search results showing you are a group of liars removing the description from the free energy article page Gdewilde s second bullet you are not familiar with the term a clear contravention of WP NPA Comment on content not on the contributor For the record I m a chemist and have worked in the American alternative energy industry both biofuels and solar so if the term were commonly used I would know This means you are familiar with free energy then there is this article about free energy suppression that makes your lie even more obvious Forth bullet Lets anounce Consensus At that point 18 44 July 19 2008 myself Arthur Rubin and Oli Filth had all removed the link to alternative energy and Gdewilde go here nl and Reddi had readded it Perhaps consensus was too strong a term to use but clearly the majority view was that the term does not belong Furthermore with exception of this and this revert by Reddi when reinserting the link no one ever provided a rationale for it s inclusion meanwhile in removing the link Arthur Oli and I always provided a reason Your reasoning was 100 lies anyone can see that