Hi It is true that this article has issues that even prevent it from becoming GA but they can be resolved First overcapitalization Windows Division Server and Tools Online Services Division must be Windows division server and tools online services division without me attempting resolve its length and clunkiness problems The first sentence reads The company s Client division produces in which Client must become client One thing that article writers must know is that Wikipedia MOS CAPS for a large part does care how everyone writes a word it only cares whether the majority think it is a definite noun or not Second 2011 present Rebranding Windows 8 and Surface suddenly mentions Kinect without context Third books must not be Wikilinked unless their content is available online Google Books preview is okay Fourth images are problematic Some has gone overzealous and shoved five images into 2011 present alone The image caption in Criticism reads BadVista and Defective by Design groups protest against Windows Vista but I only see BadVista in the image Next we go to FA level issues Referencing style inconsistencies and problems are prevalent Several sources are tagged as dead links and are not properly populated Item 104 contain three different citations Publishers are sometimes written in parentheses e g ZDNet CBS Interactive and sometimes outside e g CNET CBS Interactive That s probably because and are mingled in the article I see one instance of bogus author CNET News com Staff And my God there are naked links and plain links there These are what meet the eye and must be resolved in peer review stage Best regards