Many arguments rehashed over and over quoting Bletch Yes I could not have said it better But 99 of what I have seen are arguments based on your original research Adam s latest argument is 100 original research The obligation is on you to cite credible verifiable sources to back up your assertion No original research allowed The twelve citations provided yesterday were laughably weak Bear in mind that you are attempting to prove a negative It is easy to prove Cuba is not your favorite type of ideal democracy but that is not sufficient You actually need to prove with credible citations that Cuba is not any type of democracy even a flawed democracy is a type of democracy Haiti I was browsing around Wikipedia today and easily found more than twenty types and variants of democratic governmental systems You have a tall task to prove that Cuba is not any type of democracy There are also dozens of citations many quite credible stating that Cuba is a type of democracy so even if you succeed in your task of proving a negative unlikely even then a real and genuine point of view exists far from being a flat earth theory and can not fairly be ignored