Another attempt at ethics This is the talk page and I am talking I m not about to put this on the article itself so we don t need to be reminded that it doesn t belong there I suggest that Good altruism that the weak are right to take from the strong Neutral individualism that nobody has a right to claim anyone else s goods Evil that the strong are right to take from the weak Lawful strong adherence to an ideology Neutral weak adherence to an ideology Chaotic no adherence to any ideology