I would prefer this title to be re added I agree oldest person is much more notable but the dates at which both titles were gained are different It s still interesting to see in the box when he became oldest living Asian Furthermore it is inconsistent to leave the title Oldest living man I don t see how since the oldest living person is usually NOT the oldest living man explains this One could argue that the oldest living person is usually NOT the oldest living Asian Japanese Since 1955 the oldest person has been a man 5 times and an Asian Japanese person 7 times see Oldest people Chronological list of the verified oldest living person since 1955 That is not different enough to warrant different treatment here in my opinion Therefore I m very much in favor of keeping all four titles each is important in itself