10 July 2007 UTC Elsberry and Myers and notable commentators Notability is not a requirement for Wikipedia editors Furthermore your judgment of who is notable is arbitrary Furthermore you jerks called me a long known Internet crank and that makes me notable And so what if Elsberry and Myers did not add their references themselves they just got others to add their references for them That is really nitpicking This is a real switch usually contributors are condemned for hiding their identities and here I am condemned for revealing mine OK I am re posting my entry with my name and the name of my blog removed You can t complain about my linking to my blog because this bio already has links to blogs and the rules say that using personal and group blogs as references is not allowed the Wikipedia verifiability rule says Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published then claim to be an expert in a certain field For that reason self published books personal websites and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources The only exception to this rule are newspaper blogs footnote 4 Blogs in this context refers to personal and group blogs Some newspapers host interactive columns that they call blogs and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper s full editorial control that is when it isn t really a blog If you continue to censor my entry I will call Cheri Yecke and ask her to report to ReputationDefenders that you will not allow the posting of a rebuttal to an attack ad against her on her own bio ReputationDefenders is well connected articles about this outfit have appeared in the Wall Street Journal the Washington Post the New York Post and other major media outlets If Wikipedia s reputation suffers as a result of your continued censorship of my entry here you may find that you got more than you bargained for 06 28