Elen it s clearly not a personal attack to you because you wrote it As a probably non ASD person who knows you reasonably well I know you didn t mean ill by it But to an outside observer it can be interpreted in no other way unless a serious face value comment which would be bad for other reasons But Sandy is not attacking you despite the fact that you understandably may feel attacked She is saying this is a thing Arbs should not do yet one did and nothing was done can we handle this type of thing better why was nothing done should there be a policy on this and so forth Had she said a random arbitrator said it might have felt less personal I really doubt that she is after your checkuser bit even though I have had issues with some of the cases you have checkusered I think that it is a role you perform well and are well suited to and I don t hear anyone saying to the contrary