That s what I ve been saying Half of your edits are great so long as they don t go too far Each of those changes financial repercussions terrorist death penalty etc are good additions The problem is that it started from a polemical approach and is now being incorporated into encyclopedic processes I m sure you re not done with your work but I d still recommend targeted improvements over a great crusade or correction Excluding concerns of Europeans hmm I can t comment on that with credibility I m an American and could be unaware of my bias We do use primarily English sources which are UK US heavy It s possible we re missing some of the reactions from Germany and France Scandinavia but I still don t think our article has a particular slant That doesn t mean it s complete yet either I mean everything you ve wanted to describe we ve added just maybe not with the exhaustive detail or exposure agenda you embarked on If you re looking at the article and still thinking where s the outrage I think that s probably because the outrage is in you and not the sources Bring some sources that describe an outpouring of backlash against the calls for Assange s death for example and we ll incorporate some of that It hasn t happened extensively yet to my knowledge