1 Your comments above all sweeping useless generalizations are also extremely discribable as highly incoherent as it concerns reason What are you talking about What s your question on text validity Where do we find your jewish conspiracy theories besides the insides of the workings of your private mind which is inaccessible to us How are we to figure out what your talking about Cann t you have been more specific 2 Also why is this article about Wikipedia in general You seem to be criticising the whole world Why is this article the place for you to do that 3 Can you give us a citation just one authority which supports any of your many opinions expressed here 4 And by the way a text is never valid what is valid is an argument none of which has been made by any of the words used above In fact the above paragraph which unfortunately must go by the name of language can only give us some meaning by being psychoanalyzed But we are not shrinks here But you leave us no choice My amateur psychological interpretation of the giberish expressed above tells me that you have some feelings regarding Jews and that you seem to read those feelings into The Protocols right And that you are disappointed that those feelings of yours are not at all adequately reflected in our Wikipedia article right But as Wikipedians that s not our job here nor is it yours Wikipedia is not the place to discuss the private views of people who may feelings that there is some validity to your view that jews somewhere are conspiring to do what by the way