The article is about the storm pure and simple The name is only a small section of the article and has plenty of sources Far more editors have opposed the move Therefore until you or anyone else proves it shouldn t be there it stays where it is You can not prove its not the common name That s a extremely significant page count and i am quite sure it wouldn t be any where near that with Friedhelm as a name Anyway you are against consensus so you need to prove otherwise not me or anyone else If you have a constructive argument then i would look at changing my mind as I m sure others would As has been said above by chris only time will tell whether the name is carried on but until then we won t know