Articles as important as this one are subject to a lot of scrutiny and are edited on an incremental basis There s no mechanism in Wikipedia for appointing editing committees or requiring all the active editors to recuse themselves If you have a specific proposal please feel free to make it for editors consideration I do agree that the scattershot list of presidential actions is incomplete and hasn t been weighted properly by the importance or the extent of Obama s role I disagree about the Siena College poll at least as a matter of approach This article is a biography of the President his life and career and for that purpose presidential scholars assessing him as a president are a lot more relevant than various journalists writing about specific events c