There is disagreement over where to put the incident and which bits are notable I see the place for the incident as under the company and agree with Masem that the company article needs to avoid smearing people involved with the company obviously There are a number of different viewpoints including TheRedPenofDoom s view that the coverage of the incident strays too far into interpreting maritime law But I fear by moving the ship article to be about the incident they ve made it about the incident which I believe should be the least of the 3 unless and until it does revolutionize the field s of maritime law Coast Guard patrolling and or piracy What I would otherwise have done is stubbed the ship article and made it all dry and technical However I m not sure I have the cheek to accept the AfC myself and then cover the incident there myself especially since that s probably very much not what the AfC submitter wants And to a lesser extent because I would then have a responsibility to watch the thing at least 18 hours a day for BLP violations Hmm I may write the other article first and hope some Indian newspaper does a nice write up on the ship itself to fill the news hole