An adverse side effect of this discussion is that it just prompted me to look more critically at the source material and I m about to rewrite the existing paragraph per WP NPOV First of all the sourcing at this time consists of a dead link a post from the Museum that is a reliable source for the Museum s position but not for the events overall and an NBC News story that does not attribute the intention to disrupt to the blogger but to the Museum s interpretation of something that the blogger s companion s friend had posted some time earlier The source material contains nothing about the blog stating an intent to disrupt All of the references to disruption and the intention to disrupt are attributed to Museum spokespeople I m going to revise it citing the NBC source and a USA Today source and write it according to what the sources actually say