I break it down as follows SKATER support SarekOfVulcan support Baseball Bugs oppose Malleus Fatuorum Both suggestions are silly oppose Lara oppose Folantin support BWilkins unknown Master of Puppets oppose RegentsPark your involvement Hans Adler support Akhilleus support Excirial support SandyGeorgia unknown Philcha states Only an uninvolved admin should allowed to rule on an sanction on any editor so falls under oppose and an oppose for you closing the sanction and ruling on it Moreschi unknown iMatthew oppose r ana unknown So if this discussion yields a unified result then maybe that can be called a community sanction but the one in place now holds no water TenOfAllTrades support Black Kite oppose S Marshall oppose Antandrus support 4wajzkd02 support user J support Ssilvers support Will Beback support JohnWBarber support ChrisO support jbmurray support Until It Sleeps support ChildofMidnight oppose Tarc oppose John support Jeni support Wikidemon support Fritzpoll no consensus oppose sanctions are to be imposed based on a consensus of uninvolved editors see WP BAN will check this is the right link with many of those favouring a ban expressly indicating that they have had negative interactions with him HalfShadow oppose Would all of you kindly shut the fuck up please Protonk oppose per HalfShadow SMC oppose per HalfShadow SB Johnny unknown but I find it absolutely ridiculous that Wikipedia Requests for Comment Ottava Rima remains a redlink while there are apparently so many people willing to bitch about him ad infinitum WTF is the issue If you all have so many things you want him to change about his behavior why not just open a doggone RfC and let him know Are you scared of him or something You needn t be 18 supports 14 opposes and other comments with many pointing out that restriction standards nullify many of the supports