10 September 2010 UTC If you are referring to this that s the opinion of one person not consensus What that review states is that one reviewer an anonymous unpaid nonprofessional going by the pseudonym ReaderGirl liked the book It does not prove that the book was generally reviewed positively which is what that citation was supposed to support I can not agree that removing misleading material is a questionable action I would advise you that you appear to have an extremely strong point of view regarding the importance of this author s work and that Wikipedia discourages persons from editing articles they are personally involved in so if you are associated with this author I d encourage you to take a step back from the process it is not personal simply a consensus based matter of running a community based online encyclopedia If this author s contributions to his field begin to exceed WP AUTHOR criteria or WP NBOOK criteria I will be happy to help you build the article but until then I am afraid sourcing the lack of serious critical coverage and editorial oversight amongst sources means this article is not up to the standard 22 20