I don t see a source attached to infamously poor The preceding Please Please Me 2009 and following A remastered box set statements are footnoted 16 and 17 respectively but not the claim in question If footnote 17 is also supposed to cover infamously poor then it needs to be move closer to it and the sentence should be reworded to make clear an opinion is being cited not offered Something to the effect of The 2009 remasters replaced the heavily critized 16b 1987 remasters As it stands now the article appears to be offering its own commentary