The introduction latest change I dared change the introduction today I left many phrases that to my opinion would better have their place in the main article I think that The MMR vaccine controversy refers to claims primarily raised by a 1998 paper published in the British medical journal The Lancet 1 that some form of autism may be triggered by the MMR vaccine a vaccine against measles mumps and rubella The debate around this hypothesis which has since been infirmed by numerous studies around the world immediatly stirred a wider and sometimes very emotional controversy with a sustained media coverage due not only to the effect of such claims on the immunisation rate but also to several disturbing aspects of Dr Wakefield s work as unearthed by a journalist of the Times and that would drive to the longest GMC inquiry ever done could be enough some stress on the scientific consensus might be added mention of the latest decision of the GMC needed But for the rest in the different section of the article What do you think of that