It is also quite clear to me that an entry about a traditional dish has in principle nothing to do with neither linguistics nor politics That s not the place for POV pushing anything about the Valencian controversy BTW nowadays almost dead controversy Moreover Warrington is completely wrong if he thinks that Mountolive wants to support any fringe theory about that So unless Warrington can come up with some strong rationale why such a footnote must be included in the article I think that it should be just removed