Those dictionary definitions just say penis Can someone point me to a definition that prescribes erect please And if the article is in any way about the subject as defined by these dictionary definitions it is a content fork of penis and or human penis and must be deleted or merged into the relevant article s per policy We do not allow content forks and this is not a dictionary Why Please explain where this idea comes from Ah Fair enough Nevertheless the lead should in my opinion mention the other uses of the term and I d still like to see a citation confirming the necessity of erect But content fork No The lead should summarise the article content There is already a hatnote that makes clear what the article is about We don t need to say the same thing twice OK I agree The hatnote pointing to Primordial phallus does the job IP do you see the point being made here that primordial phallus a stage in the development of the human penis clitoris belongs in its own article or one that addresses the development of genitalia and this article isn t about that Not exactly It is one meaning of phallus is obviously related to the main subject of this article and was previously part of this article That it is not now included is self evident but the argument that the article is not about this so it shouldn t be included is non sensical There is only a hat note because I added it as all references had previously been removed