You are making a claim about the reliability of sources not only without supplying any sources to back your claim up but also stating that you do nt have to supply any WP is about reliably sourced information given due weight If two RS contradict each other then both views must be given if there is no RS refuting one We have a claim by the U S government regarding the translation We also have a claim by a RS that the governments translation is wrong I made a legitimate and relevant request for confirmation of the claim made in the article simple solution supply a source that says the discrepency is a conspiracy theory not supported by other independent translators Do not make claims of POV pushing without 1 supplying evidence i e a source that says the discrepency is a conspiracy theory and 2 proving this conspiracy theory is widespread enough that everyone should know it is a conspiracy theory It gets a little tiresome when editors throw the truther tag around as a thinly disguised PA to avoid proving their case