Basically what Kizzle said 1 It s clearly too much emphasis on a so far minor episode in his life for the main article But there s no reason to delete the material from wikipedia particularly since it may very well become quite pertinent within a couple months Also as ArnoldReinhold point out it is quite important as a White House scandal reneging on the firing promise apparent failure of Bush to simply ask his senior staff about their involvement etc I think that aspect is at least as important as many of the Clinton scandals with daughter articles Travelgate Filegate Kathleen Willey etc 2 Just merge it into the Plame article or make it into its own article with a summary and link here I did that a while back with the various Clinton scandals Makes the Clinton article readable and gives room for the scandal articles to grow appropriately 3 As to length implying POV of course it doesn t indicate that it just reflects that it has been in the news a lot recently That always happens for current events articles