This kind of crap is exactly why Wikipedia is failing to get new editors There is not a great deal known about the W21 it HAS to be a short article but it FILLS a gap in a nomenclature system with SOMETHING to give context to the history of nuclear weapons system development The glee with which you folks try to pound square pegs into round holes is admirable in a manic sort of way But when one has seen the persistance of a fraction of a quote and the rejection of the fully documented FULL quote which contradicted the malicious editing of the full quote by those using the fraction of a sentence it is clear that there is a substantial flaw in the system by which the Wikipedia is edited I was amused by this speedy deletion crap because I was considering doing a bit as requested on the Packard J49 But as few were built and even if they were America s first fan jet the amount of material would no doubt disappoint you folks Sorry if your clique of insiders doesn t get it Why should I waste my time