If you are referring to 18 re functional boolean algebra enumeration and 19 re functional boolean algebra enumeration these were both authored by myself I can return to the IP 209 112 38 254 to edit this commentary as stated also both 1 and 2 are both authored by myself interesting Freudian emphasis on both As for modifying 17 Hoping you can help as stated above I did not know that when modifying a comment if the equal equal top line is deleted then the content becomes appended to the previous comment It was not intentional and I ve apologized also to the author of that compromised comment So the problem is redundant redundancy from the existence of 18 and 19 that could have been easily rectified if all but the top equal equal line in 18 were modified to reference the new content in 19 Especially rectified if the 19 clone did not exist in the first place Why the wiki environs made the 19 clone I have no idea Why the wiki commenting environ is so sensitive to this editing error I have no idea Given the sensitivity the equal equal line should be isolated on a separate edit field above the main content editing area to avoid this unintentional editing error I have since found other anecdotal information regarding this issue on wikipedia with similar suggestions pro and con It was an accident with no vandalistic destructive or malicious intent I am too busy assisting and encouraging others in their endeavours and efforts to be subversive