Controversy No evidence given of non NPOV claim The article states that But of course flaws can also be found in these anti Dvorak works for example claiming that the man in charge of the 1956 investigation had a personal grudge against Dvorak Aside from this sentence not fitting Wiki grammar standards it has no reference supporting it or an evidence at all and it reads frankly like a pro DVORAK smear I ve put a CN tag on it for now and I ll come back in a few days to see if it has been improved otherwise I think it should go