Which attitude Yours My aim WAS to improve the article by taking out speculative nonsense from it You have not addressed any of the points I have raised It is clear from your own comments on this page that this the material is all your own research for example extroplating a completely irrelevant quote from Condoleeza Rice and applying it to an unrelated debate about forms of government that was your idea wasn t it Your own research is not valid content for wikipedia do you not understand that If you re not willing to do the work in sourcing your writing to someone notable then take out the unsourced material That s all I am asking I didn t remove any of the substantive points you had made just the unconvincing original research you used in supporting them