Okay here is a photo of a San Francisco urban commune that provides among other things an example of what I meant by sartorially diverse and it is available by Creative Commons license On the downside it is in black and white which I know is a problem for some people and it was taken in 1972 when in the US at least the folks this article calls hippies were far more likely to self describe as freaks It would be a valuable addition to the meager hippie related material on Wikimedia Commons in any case so perhaps someone familiar with the appropriate licensing template there which I am not would take on the task of uploading it A number of other interesting images are available from the same source Just for the sake of balance here is one showing a rural commune I wonder how many of those tie dye diaper babies rebelled against their parents by moving to the gritty city spiking their hair and doing a stretch of years as hippie hating punks According to the edit history Bell Bottom Girl already transformed from Young girl wearing into Hippie was rotated into the lede spot at 01 08 12 September 2011 over three years ago now Where were the itchy undo trigger fingers and demands for prior consensus when that happened For evidence that hippie does indeed mean a style of clothing to some people one need look no farther than the top of this talk page where WikiProject Fashion appears as one of the project categories but that is not what 99 percent of the article s text is about and it is not what the lede image should be conveying The sad truth is that more than a few people turning to WP to figure out what a hippie was is will be forming their impressions based more on the most prominent image than on the text so that IMO even with a revised caption the young lady is continuing to do actual harm where she is and needs to be moved out of that spot SOON