21 December 2005 UTC I think you should take another look at the FAC page because the objections came after I made the edit not before I also think you should review WP Verifiability an official policy which can not be overridden by consensus From the Consensus guideline page Consensus should not trump NPOV or any other official policy a group of editors may be able to shut out certain facts and points of view through persistence numbers and organization This group of editors should not agree to an article version that violates NPOV but on occasion will do so anyway This is generally agreed to be a bad thing The underlying dispute is a simple verifiability issue in several places the text of the article is inconsistent with sometimes nearly contradictory to the references it cites and needs to be corrected 15 26