The reasons your sources are not RS has nothing to do with point of view They are self published works Material cited from a non RS source such as another web site or a self published work carries no more weight than material which has no citation at all If you permit the former you should permit the latter This case is unique in that the church publishes nothing and there is very little RS material If you like we can take the sections I restored place them on a legitimate web site and then cite that web site Would that satisfy you I won t bother responding to your assessment of my previous position I think we agree that POV and accuracy issues are more important than sourcing in this case However controversial statements should always be sourced from a RS