Again argumentum ad Google irrelevant And even if it weren t so Google most certainly does not return anywhere near 103 results for voluntary pedophilia let alone 103 000 quotes people quotes don t search loose words Arguing over Google hits is besides the point Randoms trying to capitalize on one comment which they chose to interpret in a way that defies logic do not change the fact that Wikipedia is not a soapbox The guy said he s skeptic that Bush s forces have ordered troops to kill lots of Iraqis will we add a whole section saying he s a Bush supporter too Yeah that would make lots of sense about as much as these supposed pedophilia comments I m sure there must be some Slashdot flamewar out there arguing over whether his beard is black or brown will we mention that too Stallman s blog has hundreds of entries will we make a section for each of them Or just the ones that we can twist to label him with loaded words Wikipedia is not Google This is not notable it has been debated for 2 weeks or more and the ratio of remove to not remove comments in the above above 2 sections is like 12 to 1 I m taking it out again