Your still missing my point This is not about any POV and then finding any other POV It has to be logically tied to the arguments of the subject and within context Your addition is not as explained Saving lives and being a terrorist is not mutually exclusive So the one argument does not touch the other Get it Thus it is off topic here Regarding the Stohl material yes I saw it there and looked it up They are paraphrasing the scholars who make that argument I verified it was correct And they do cite the Atomic bombings in particular I don t see the problem of stating that Lastly why are you still using the has to say state terrorism argument That s a dead horse so no need to open that up again