I would prefer not to say that you have extreme bias but just to say that you have bias as do we all Sometimes a person s bias and POV make it difficult to understand the arguments which another person has Bias does not make you a bad person but each of us has to discuss the perceived bias in the article and try to find a way which both of us are comfortable with In my opinion denying your description of the past is a good attitude if I followed a bad attitude I would write up a description of every time you violated my perception of the rules I m avoiding doing this I ll give you a short version I wrote a description of many of by edits in the talk page before I made the edits in the article I waited for what I thought was a reasonable amount of time For most of the rest of the changes I described them in the talk page after I made the change Again there was no objection in the talk page You have an explanation for why you didn t respond While I understand your reasons somewhat I don t agree with your actions of the past However I don t think we accomplish anything by deciding which of us is the purer wikipedian You think I violated the rules I think you violated the rules The good news is that we don t have to decide who was worse if we give it another try If I really had a bad attitude I would continue my perceived list of your violations But I will stop here Let s continue talking and move forward Let s try to discuss the article itself soon