I see that my wording was vague SummerPhD and you went with the reading that assumes I don t know how Wikipedia works so let me clarify I meant a reliable source not just any old user getting on here to defend hipsters Now that we re over the stupid procedural talk does anyone have anything of substance to say about my suggestion This article makes some good points but I m not familiar with the publication so I d like to get a read on how reliable people think it is before I would bother putting any quotes from it into the article