The problem here is you and your co hort Finneganw whose only contributions to this page have been to slander and throw accusations at everybody who do not see things your way I know what I believe I do not need you to lie about it As for Rathlef none of her writings have been proven wrong What happened happened And she was a first hand witness not like the writings of Prince Christopher which are nothing but hearsay I know you are adamantly against Rathlef s account of what took place at the Mommsen Clinic in 1925 but her version has been backed up by Herluf Zahle and Professor Rudnev And when you read Bella Cohen s interview with Olga and Shura in the New York Times you realize that Frau Rathlef s version was really minimizing what took place Also Frau Rathlef sent her manuscript via the Danish Embassy in Berlin to Olga for verification Olga returned the manuscript with the remark that is was quite correct Olga s own writings also verify that she was of the opinion that the unknown patient in Berlin was her niece None of this makes Anna Anderson into a Grand Duchess it only shows that the persons involved Olga Shura and Gilliard were of the belief that it might be her Vorres version was issued after Olga s death and also belies Olga s own writings and has very little in common with Olga s own testimony in Toronto Hamburg In Kurth s book you will also find him saying that Franzisca had joined Anastasia and the Tsar s daughter He clearly keeps the two Anastasias apart See my earlier post Again put your glasses on and read page xix in Peter Kurth s book PRINCIPAL CHARACTERS Anastasia Tschaikovsky also known as Anna Anderson claimant to the identity of Grand Duchess Anastasia Anastasia Nicolaievna Grand Duchess of Russia Got it ChatNoir24 talk As for the end of the myth of Franzisca Schanzkowska yes that happened with Doris Rittman running out of the court room after refusing to take the oath And I am still waiting for you to discredit anything in Kurth s book