This is utterly odd Using words like nasty suggests too much of an identification with the subject of the wiki article It s not our job here to determine whether things are nasty or not And the suggestion that this is libellous also has no foundation Is Phillips suing Stonewall for defamation On what basis can you justify libel in this article I am concerned that the neutrality of this article is being undermined by only keeping in references to nice awards and nice events Can I remind you that this is not a hagiography And on what grounds do you make the arguments for poor sourcing