Why I deleted your edits Hi Shangora you seem to be new here and I ve just steam rolled over some of your first edits I thought I d try to explain why so you don t get the wrong idea The piece of text you added about solitary wicca wasn t necessary because the article doesn t say that solitary wicca is in any way wrong Wikipedia has a specic policy of avoiding taking any point of view See Wikipedia NPOV and all that can or should be written is factual verifiable information on the subject such as So and so author claims that Solitary Wicca is a valid form of Wicca for such and such reason or so and so other author claims it isn t I personally am of the traditional variety of Wicca but I try to avoid letting that bias me there s plenty still in the article that s reflective of non traditional eclectic Wicca that I haven t touched Regardless of what I think that is now one of the uses of the term Wicca So back to that section you added it wasn t really necessary to the article and it was written from a strong Solitary point of view and it also hadn t been very well proof read for spelling etc The second section I removed was the creation myth I removed this because it was a more lengthy than is appropriate for an encyclopedia entry Wicca is already well over the recommended limit and b because it is only one author s concept of a creation myth and although it has been inspirational to some Wiccans it is not broadly representative of Wicca Having said my piece I now want to welcome you to Wikipedia and apologise for being the big bad wolf