Ports OK I just don t want more unsourced crap to sort through later This article is already shoddy poorly written poorly organized and poorly sourced Why don t we try fixing it instead of adding more poorly source poorly written and poorly organized crap Ports don t deserve their own section Ports belong in a development section Granted this article doesn t have such a section but why don t we try making one instead of contributing more spam Also for that matter what makes ports noteworthy If it s a port released a decade later with new features as a tenth anniversary edition or something Tomb Raider Anniversary Resident Evil Deadly Silence then I can see why we would add information Titus Software ported the game to the Super NES and released it in 1996 It has some missing features and lacks several stages including the last one How does this add significant understanding of the topic to the article How does it significantly enhance the readers understanding It doesn t look like it does to me it just looks like something that could be tossed into a trivia section What makes this a reliable source The over arching question How does any of this constitute anything more than poorly written organized and sourced crap that could be tossed into a useless Trivia section which fails to enhance the readers understanding