Legally there were two cases The only evidence in the sexual assault investigation was a description by a 6 year old child That description had nothing to do with the USA PATRIOT Act I ve spent a great deal of time investigating this and I can t find any factual source that says Adkins was involved in the selling of child pornography I believe that your statement on that is incorrect as well To report that the act was used to investigate child pornography assumes that he was selling it If he was only looking at pornography of underage women that he didn t even know were underage until proof was shown your title is highly misleading to say the least I know that emotions are high on this but Wikipedia is a factual resource not a lynching forum