Arians vs Homoians Hello my edits about Arians and Homoians were removed by a user who did not log in I d like to hear justification for these edits Most scholars of late antiquity would not use Arian to discuss most of the contenders for ecclesiastical power in the late 4th century AD Their Nicene opponents like Ambrose of Milan and Gregory of Nyssa would have called them Arians and those opponents ended up prevailing and defining Orthodoxy however these ecclesiastics would not have called themselves this and more importantly were a different group than the self declared followers of Arius from the early 4th century Check out Daniel Williams Ambrose of Milan and the End of the Nicene Arian Conflicts for more details Unless the nameless editor would like to discuss the reasons behind these changes I d like to revert back The resulting article doesn t even make grammatical sense for one thing