I cut the statement because it was in the Structure section where it did not belong The AGN activity should be covered in the Nucleus section However I did not see how to place the statement into the Nucleus statement without rewriting the section so I moved the statement to the talk page Also NED should not be trusted for its AGN classification NED garbles some AGN classifications and sometimes chooses strange references for its AGN classification Look up NGC 4826 for example NED lists this as a Seyfert 2 because someone found that this objects lands in a weird place in a diagram On the other hand Ho et al 1997 using systematic line diagnostics categorize this as a transition type galaxy transitory between LINER and HII I would recommend finding another reference for the AGN classification That s good information Thank you I ll see what I can do to address it