Oh would you just SHUT THE FUCK UP already The only one who has no value to Wikipedia as a whole is YOURSELF YOU constantly put YOUR own values and opinions into articles that would be best left unsubstantiated in that form or simply left as they are A good example of this would be the rec sport pro wrestling entry where you put your opinion back into the entry after being told months before it should be left OUT of the entry You are always crying Mommy The article has vandalism I need to revert it Waaaah Waaah Waah and when you aren t screaming your head off in a restaurant annoying other patrons with your ludicrous justifications of vandalism you are yelling at the waiter about how much harrassment there is Frankly I think you would be best off banned not just for 24 hours but permanently however that s not my decision to make just as it s not YOUR decision to label other user accounts as so called sockpuppets simply because your paranoid nature suspects them as so Anyhow I believe the Mormon Church reference should not be within the article Who cares who owns the stations The behavior of the stations are not relevant rather their factual information up to and including anchorpersons and other such trivia should be included There are many ways to phrase the article without putting pro Mormon propaganda into the mix as has been stated before the only reason that Chadbryant believes it to be vandalism or improvement or whatever damn thing he s harking about this week is because HE is Mormon thus his reasons for the information going into it can not be placed into the article in a completely neutral manner or placement of thought As for Mormon to LDS who really cares Both are correct in this instance and an outsider to the entry would be able to comprehend the point of the facts either way For those who would believe Mr Chadbryant to be some good Wikipedia Samaritin I suggest you do a little bit of research on the subject first He has a long drawn out history on Wikipedia to place his own opinions and petty behaviors into their entries see his recent 24 hour ban for violation of the 3RR rule as a good example and this is no exception I am more than willing to discuss this problem though I don t see how there is one other than Chad s biasedness and social phobias coming to light in a cybertext form on this talk page so long as Mr Chadbryant does not come along and delete my comments or edit my entries as he has been found to have a history of doing so