I am trying to give examples of the sort of people who might raise the objections mentioned Apologists is already cited Mabey pastors priests rabbis seminary professors spiritual guides and some religous writers Also non Abrahamic examples need to be sought out like figures in the Native American population mabey Shaman I ll put in some of these into the article What I would like included are examples of religous individuals that would object other than the main defender eg apologists Some evangelists especially the televangelists a sub category of evangelists do defend against perceived attacks and would take such use of terminology as an attack on thier religion as I have heard them say As to the reason why somebody would want to object to such use I am not sure Your proposition that win others over by claiming the uniqueness of their religious belief is possible BTW WLNK is shorthand for wikilink wlnk I think that you tooks that as wink Sincerely PS If the terminology of the Abrahamic mythologies are changed the same should be done to the Native American mythologies