December 2012 UTC I agree advocates for the protection of the Second Amendment is not a neutral statement More particularly it violates WP MISSION The NRA may say it does something but that s not enough to include its self description in Wikipedia The criteria for inclusion in WP under WP RS and WP NPOV are multiple references by WP RSs The WP RSs must be reliable secondary sources subject to fact checking If you can find such sources that say the NRA advocates for the protection of the Second Amendment it might go in but otherwise it must go out I agree that the NRA advocates for the expansion of private access to guns under the Second Amendment is a neutral statement Specifically that s what needs to be changed 20 44 22