Featured article nomination I have gone through all the concerns well a great deal of them anyway of the most recent peer review including verifying all the references and standardizing their format I think we re about ready for another FA nomination Are there any outstanding concerns on anything My only outstanding concern is the References section it is clogged with a lot of the Cambridge Companion However I can t find a Wikipedia convention or another featured article that has an example like this an article in which multiple essays are repeatedly cited from an edited collection of essays by separate authors It would de complexify if that s a word the References section s appearance if we could compress all those references down to one What then would we do with the shortened footnotes citing the separate essays That s my only concern I am very excited about our FA prospects this time around