Big problems in the Protestantism section I apologize for not coordinating before doing a blanket replacement I think the Protestantism section has a number of problems 1 Most of it is not about Protestantism or any one theme It s hard to see what the section says about lust in the context of Protestantism 2 Much of it is about the meaning of which is really about the meaning of a Greek term and an English term used to translate it one time in the New Testament Neither term is specifically sexual I referred to standard Greek lexicons to make that point for Greek 3 The section as written uses Strong s as though it were a Greek dictionary It is not It does not refer to any Greek lexicon That s why my rewrite did If you want to know what a Greek word means it s a good idea to look it up in a standard reference In general the section seems to be expert Greek advice given by someone who probably does not read Greek My rewrite also listed several other passages that use the word including the Septuagint reference to thou shalt not covet which Matthew 5 likely refers to 4 In translations of the New Testament which translations Only English translations presumably I think the King James and many subsequent translations use this term 5 The discussion of several understandings of Matthew 5 27 28 doesn t say why this particular list of notions is given It is not at all representative of common understandings in Protestantism or among biblical scholars For instance I m not aware of any mainstream Protestant or scholarly view that suggests that this verse demands celibacy or that it would allow homosexual lust but not heterosexual lust And one of the mainstream views that it means one should not covet using the same Greek word used for thou shalt not covet in Exodus is not represented