St Volodymyr s Cathedral Dear David I would like to bring your attention to the article on St Volodymyr s Cathedral Less than two weeks ago this was a nicely written article about the Cathedral about the architecture mosaics frescoes the history how the Cathedral was built etc see the last version of by Mzajac At decided to use this preaty neutral and nice article to push his POV that is far from being neutral see his contribution This stared a long lasting edit war Even if his insertion were neutral this was definitelly not the case this is a serious question whether it s legal to use architecture art music etc articles for advertising or bringing attention to political issues Does it improve the Wikipedia content Does it make the work of editors more productive Is it not an abuse of Wikipedia for propaganda purposes It looks like this is a more broad question Inserting political stuff into initially quite neutral nice and polpular articles is quite common in Wikipedia I admit that the question is not simple Sometimes political stuff is important and the article looks incomplete without it But in most cases the politiocal stuff is irrelevant and just force the reader to spend his her time for reading the information s he was not actually looking for In my opinion a serious discussion is needed What s your opinion It would be indeed nice to protect the article in its politics free form until the discussion is over On the other hand if and consider the political stuff important they can write a separate article on the subject Is it not a reasonable compromize It would be however nice if somebody of experienced and respectable users would explain and that it is extremely important to base the Wikipedia articles on creadible sources and to avoid any propaganda issues