What exactly is your problem with King Kelly film Apparently you weren t satisfied with my answer to why it shouldn t be speedied since you just tagbombed it with fansite more footnotes recentism ref improve and unreliable sources Care to explain why I m removing them unless you can actually show a problem with the article The article is written factually and neutrally so fansite is not applicable Things that need citing are cited inline so more footnotes and ref improve aren t applicable If you see something which you think needs an inline cite feel free to add cite needed Recentism makes no sense it s a film from November 2012 so all the reviews are from November 2012 And as for unreliable sources I fail to see how the New York Times Film Journal International and Slant Magazine are unreliable Please reply at Talk King Kelly film