original research Please see these links also support this controversy and there are hundreds more link just google search it Huge heap of third rate sources with 2 rs s Does any the reliable ones you see of it contain the word controversy in it Wikipedia editors can not label anything as controversy unless explicitly stated by the source to be a controversy As for there are hundreds more link just google search it shit of the World Wide Web does not find a place here Plus the burden lies on you the editor to add sources not me I have deliberately avoided using wl s because an editor of 8 years should know your policy on sourcing You call other users valid links unreliable but your links comes from sources which are unknown and can t be trusted Not done There doesn t seem to be a consensus to include the suggested content at this time Protected edit request on 17 March 2014 edit protected answered yes