Easier to digest I m not sure I buy therefore easier to digest I think it is easier to digest three separate policies than one longer multi topic one even if the total length of the three separate ones exceeds that of the combined one That said I don t think ATT is hard to digest and to the extent that it might resolved problems with RS the end result may be better and be easy enough to digest Looks good otherwise Other than the two above issues it is pretty compelling in theory there are all kinds of things that can go wrong no everyone is in cahoots with the attributable vs attributed and attributable attributed vs verifiable distinctions and who knows what changes might creep in later but I don t see any particular reason that ATT couldn t be viable I think Jimbo was unnecessarily harsh about it though I agree with some of his gripes mostly the procedural consensus ones As I said elsewhere I think one of the two possible Jimbo compromise end results would be better than ATT totally replacing the others or ATT going away