I find the argument ludicrous beyond words I quite like iot for that reason since it screams out its own silliness But of course it is not a notable argument discussed by other writers Oxfordian editors are keen to include stuff from this journal because it comnprises their main bid for academic respectability I actually thinkn it would be better to have a section discussing Oxfordian publications ending with the establishment of this journal itself noting that it aims to situate itself as a peer reviewed scholarly journal see the Brief Chronicles article written by its editor A few comments on the content af articles including this one could be added in that section