the movement itself is the subject of very few articles Virtually all reliable sources are about the events and people involved In short the controversy You mentioned the Watergate scandal which is an apt analogy That article is virtually all about the events and people the scandal Keep in mind that there wasn t a Watergate movement just some people dubbed the Watergate Seven which we happen to have an article on only because they were caught and subsequently received widespread coverage in the press On the other hand sources struggle to define the Gamergate movement They can t point to anyone responsible And they can t point to any official goals or statements other than this person who claims to be a supporter said X And yes that comes with heavy qualification because reliable sources find those goals and statements to be misplaced and diversionary To make a long story short too late per UNDUE we won t be rewriting the article to highlight something that reliable sources overwhelmingly dismiss