How do you mean Jimbo I believe the gist of the points counter to Til s aren t that no one has ever claimed that creation myth is a bad descriptor of these passages but that this view is 1 very dated and 2 a fringe position within scholarship The argument is over how much room one needs to give a fringe position in the introduction to the article Til wants to include language that makes it seem like there is a lot of opposition when there isn t This is what people object to We should not be saying many scholars when referring to a position that is very rarely challenged by anyone This gives off a false impression and hurts our credibility If anything I could see an argument for including the opposing position with the disclaimer some Christian theologians or something of that nature Disclaimer I was an avid proponent of changing the title to the current one