Block of 24 192 44 141 was blocked until 13 August by you because of an attempt to make a contact with a fourteen year old The evidence given in Wikipedia Abuse Reports consisted of s complaint in the Administrators Noticeboard and the anonymous user s comment in Karrmann s user page I ve looked at the anon user s edit at Karrmann s complaint as well as the block notice and I was wondering if everything really added up on this one in hindsight There seems to be a misapprehension on Karrmann s part about what Anon intended with his comment I m not seeing anything in Anon s comment to support Karrmann s assertion that Anon is a predater sic On that basis I was wondering if a block of this duration makes sense in retrospect and I was hoping I could persuade you to give it a second look As an aside I have no connection to either of these users I just happened to see the abuse report and had a hard time understanding what abuse needed reported to the anon user s ISP Thanks for your time consideration and feel free to contact me via my if you d like to chat about this