Yes that s a perfectly reasonable suggestion And I quite agree Except that what is clear to wikipedia editors is not always acceptable We have no WP RS of their being off their heads I think there is a large disconnect between the use of the word murder as in has been legally convicted of murder and what any sane person looking at the available evidence from the media would immediately describe as murder Of course the outcome of legal procedings is sometimes wrong And many people even after they have been fully identifed commit murders and escape justice This does not make them innocent of murder It just means they have not been legally convicted Wikipedia still has to be guided by due legal process of course even if it is flawed and however long it takes to complete But by the same token where there is little or no doubt as to the identities of the killers how can a article title which uses the simple phrase Murder of be justified The two killers here may never reach trial But if they do survive their intervening custody until they are convicted we d have to use the politically correct Suspected muder of or Alledged murder of In the real world I d argue there are few reliable sources saying These men murdered Lee Rigby only because reporters don t want to state the obvious not because they have ethical misgivings or fear legal censure