Comment The NPOV tag seems completely appropriate There is no consensus that it should be removed or that the article as it currently stands is neutral The point of taking the sexual abuse case to another page was to prevent it from overpowering and unbalancing the rest of the article I also support the tag because the opening of the section in question is constructed in such a way as to mislead the reader into concluding that Polanski s actions were worse than they actually were For example it doesn t explain that Polanski offered her the quaalude and that she willingly took it which leaves the impression he slipped her a mickey finn It also states that he had oral genital and anal sex with her despite repeated protests and being asked to stop which leaves the impression that he literally raped her when by her own admission she relented to his advances albeit reluctantly That s why he was eventually charged with unlawful sexual intercourse than rather rape per se I believe those problems should be fixed before the POV tag is removed This topic is being closed and being withdrawn Please use other areas to raise concerns on additions Thank you Where does someone state he didn t realize it was illegal to have sex with a 13 year old I m concerned about this edit Where in the documentary was that said And in what context Was it just some local police saying I suppose he didn t think it was illegal in America to have sex with a 13 year old you know how those dirty Europeans are it surely allowed over there or is there some proof this is what he thought You can t give undue weight to something This sounds like just someone s personal opinion What exactly was said He didn t seem to realize the severity of his crimes I also dislike this edit your right DFocus the thought police are needed for this one I support removal