It is patently clear that you still do not grasp the reasoning why you are in error at best you don t understand it and at worst you are ignoring it Wikipedia is open to those that do not misrepresent unaccepted theories as fact You wrote that Theodore White used astrology to successfully predict the earthquake The source you used is a proponent of a fringe theory This is unsatisfactory We must not present astrology as a mainstream scholarly accepted theory for the same reason that the article on Earth does not suggest that the world might be flat An article on the earth where it is implied or stated that the earth might be a flat plane as some fringe theorists think would be colossally stupid We do not give undue significance to perspectives that don t deserve it