January 2013 UTC I revise my opinion I have since seen several other examples of Wikipedia editors creating visual representations demonstrating the purport of other sources and I now realize that what Fnlayson says in this issue is true Consider by using words we in fact create demonstrations of other works We are describing in words what other sources have said To a degree creating representations using JPG images we as Wikipedia editors create is no different in intent than creating representations using words Given that I strike out my previous opinion and now believe these images are acceptable and are not original research per se If this issue or others like it is addressed formally in codified Wikipedia standards I am not and was not aware of it if there is not there should be 07 16 21