ec Keegan before we go deeper into the article itself are you satisfied that 1 Hoolio can speak for Rodriguez and 2 that Rodriguez asserts via Hoolio I assume that the description Jesuit Priest is incorrect and or unwanted If Rodriguez is notable in his own right then there should be plenty of steers in the opinions section of his home page at his university which is in Spanish The problem is that nobody who speaks Spanish shows any interest in this page If he is not notable in his own right then the article belongs in the bin and the description of the controversy belongs somewhere else we can discuss where the right place is later The controversy surrounding the publication of Man of Ashes i e the English Language version of A7393 Hombre de Cenizas is verifiable A university decided to translate the book and employed not just a translator but also historians to check out the plausibility of the events described Rodriguez delayed publication of Man of Ashes by legal threats There are articles describing the event by more than one author out there The idea that only some proportion of an article can be negative seems strange to me and not really what NPOV is about but I don t do many BLPs Do we wait for the Spanish speakers to add a thousand words and only then include reports of what happened But until that kilo word arrives we must keep mum Lastly the article uses or did what would normally be reliable sources we are not attaching WP UNDUE weight to some crackpot writing on some obscure blog whose ideas have been picked up by a credulous journalist somewhere