16 21 May 2015 UTC Please do not hastily remove sections SummerPhd I noticed you removed my section on coconut oil I understand that I did not give an explanation for removing some content so let me explain First I m new to editing articles on Wikipedia and this was my first edit so I missed the explaination section at the bottom of the page I noticed that some significant modifications have been made to some pages regarding foods that you might find in health food stores some of which are completely unfounded For example deleting information regarding nutritional composition or studies linking foods to particular health effects seems to be some kind of info war to me If you or others who delete these sections feel that the issue is not so black and white then additional content needs to placed to challenge those studies rather than removing the content entirely The section I removed seemed to me to read as biased The section reads Many health organizations advise against the consumption of coconut oil due to its high levels of saturated fat including and then a list of organizations are listed First of all none of those references make any statements advising against the consumption of coconut oil they only talk about limiting saturated fat If you read the section on saturated fat you would notice that the issue is not that cut and dry In fact some studies show that 7 SFA and TFA may have a reduced risk for cardiovascular disease The actual picture may be more complicated and ratios of saturated mono and polyunsaturated fats may be more important than actual levels of these fats but this is mere conjecture to me that I am not interested in defending Although it is not that cut any dry I still maintain that caution should be taken with the consumption of saturated fats There is enough data to suggest that although the picture is much more complex than we originally thought there may be good reason to limit saturated fat intake But completely removing a macronutrient from your diet may have unintended consequences which is probably why none of these agencies advocate a complete elimination of saturated fat but to maintain low levels of it I did not see listing all of those agencies as necessary It appeared to read like a biased article and in order to eliminate the feeling I had that it felt biased I still kept the original argument but in a more succinct fashion with the references in tact Since lauric acid is a saturated fat moderation is recommended by many health organizations which advise a higher ratio of monounsaturated fats and polyunsaturated fats I included all of the original citations at the end of this sentence Nevertheless instead of restoring the old content in addition to mine you completely removed my content despite it containing a good amount of studies some from notable journals And the content I wrote was not particularly regarding saturated fat and it s controversy but instead it mentioned the antimicrobial effects of MCTs and monolaurin If you feel that there is some debate in some of the findings that I presented you should instead include those in the article rather than completely removing my edit I hope this explains things for you SummerPhd Please be less hasty about deleting content on Wikipedia many people rely on it to learn about complex issues If you feel that the section is biased please mention how If you feel that it s more complicated please explain and cite your reasons with sources from journals Readers have a right to make up their own minds about these subjects and wikipedia is all about shedding light on all the complex dimensions of our world not merely maintaining a one sided argument The article you are editing coconut oil has been through a few heated debates including both edit warring and sockpuppetry The edit you have made makes several substantial changes to the status quo that emerged after those debates please see the article s talk page and edit history for more information As such edits which make numerous changes are probably not going to fly You ll find much more success if you take on smaller