10 January 2008 UTC Well it s definitely not vandalism I would qualify even egregious violations of WP FRINGE as disruption and not vandalism If the problem is long term I suggest you find an administrator who is familiar with either the subject matter or history of the page Sorry to be of so little help but I simply do not have the time to delve deep into the background issues You re an admin so I don t mean to template you but intentionally disruptive edits are the very definition of vandalism Vandalism is any addition removal or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia That would include egregious violations of WP FRINGE such as for instance pushing Young Earth Creationism on the article on Evolution Lastly your invocation of long term vandalism seems to go against WP SPP since the burden of proof for page protectionism is severe vandalism not long term vandalism Also I m posting this conversation under my page protect request 13 16