Wikipedia doesn t follow blogs The internet is full of considerable volumes of total nonsense There s no reason for this article to follow it just because the volume of nonsense has reached a certain level In fact Wikipedia policy precludes us from following it It s pretty obvious there s a widespread internet based misunderstanding of the status of di Pietro of similar silliness to Dan Brown thinking da Vinci was a name for Leonardo If and when a reliable source makes this point it might be coverable here but not before