Lunatic fringe I do not believe the line leading the lunatic fringe is sufficent to use the perajcitive term in that manner in this article A writer for Time something something lunatic fringe might work but this is a BLP and there is not a preponderance of evidence or sources equating him to being the leader of a leaderless group I also believe the editor should be ashamed of himself for including such information in BLP without considering the caution that is neccasary Juicey sources do not equal good sources