I was one of the many anonymous reviewers of Recursive Fury while the article was still embargoed I have surrendered that anonymity because of the many falsehoods being spewed by denialists and disavowers regarding the article and why the journal retracted it As noted above 1 the journal did not retract the article the article was removed from the web site for economic reasons and 2 neither I or anyone else that I am aware of have been able to find any major flaws in Recursive Fury The baseless opinion that the paper is absurd is absurd The article stands unimpeached and is a fine reference for this Wikipedia article If anyone thinks otherwise I encourage that person to write a paper on the subject and submit it to a science journal for peer review and publication