I apologize for flinging around what one could perceive as irrelevant comments I still wonder why we need to make this personal and whether my invocation of what you perceive to be irrelevant facts justifies personal attacks Regardles the facts are these 1 The hits last month of articles on the disamb page to articles other than John Leland antiquarian together add up to more than the hits to the antiquary article If you do not include hits to John Leland Center for Theological Studies though WP PRIME is silent on this the combined hits of the non antiquary articles do not exceed the antiquary hits I do not think we can be sure that the article on the Center will never be called simple John Leland by a person searching for it but I can not think of a way to prove it either way 2 If you go back to February the hits are as follows 762 antiquary with 23 of those coming from the Leyland redirect 177 journalist 507 Baptist 80 Presbyterian 268 the Center Even if you do not subtract the 23 hits that came from the Leyland redirect and do not count any hits to the Center the non antiquary hits are still greater if barely than the antiquary hits 3 The antiquary is the number one result in a Google books search 4 The journalist is the number one result in a Google news search 5 The Baptist appears most often and higher up in a Google web search on the first page 6 Since last month you deleted the listing for John Leland MP despite several articles having redlinks to the same I created that article and returned it to the disamb page I noted that I do not anticipate that this article would receive a huge number of hits but it will be more than zero thus increasing the disparity between the total hits to non antiquary articles and the hits to the antiquary article in some months or closing the gap between the other individuals named John Leland and the antiquary in other months if one chooses not to count hits to the Center or the other see alsos 7 In the last few days I expanded the journalist article just a bit added many proper wikilinks pointing to the article and added some categories I would expect this stub to get more hits in the future as a result The journalist author is quite notable and increasingly so 8 I also added listings for two other individuals for whom John Leland makes up their first and middle names I would not weigh that heavily in the analysis Together placing most weight on Nos 1 5 above as seems proper to me per WP PRIME I think these weigh in favor of keeping John Leland as the disambiguation page I do not think John Leland antiquary is more likely than all the others combined to be the subject being sought when a reader clicks the Go button after typing John Leland especially going forward