Misleading statement The opening paragraph has a sentence that reads While a component found in m nuka honey has antibacterial properties in vitro there is no conclusive evidence of medicinal or dietary value other than as a sweetener Yes manuka honey has antibacterial properties in vitro but it has been shown to have antibacterial properties in vivo Google Scholar lists a number of studies And the word conclusive is subjective I am sure many people would state that evolution or general relativity have not been conclusively shown to be true This sentence is biased and needs to be corrected Preceding unsigned comment added by An antibacterial claim is a conclusive anti disease statement that would hold manuka honey science to the standards required of an approved drug it obligates WP MEDRS sourcing There appear to be no such sources in the drug or food regulations of any government internationally recognized health research institutions or the world s randomized clinical trial literature