Nope The material you added didn t provide balance and you admit you included it under a completely different premise If it actually provided balance then you wouldn t have to use MoS guidelines to merit its inclusion because it would already be directly relevant to the film as an alternative response Your material isn t a response to the film and therefore offers no balance to other interpretations or criticisms regarding the ending scene of the movie I m more than happy to include other interpretations or comments on the ending scene of the movie from reliable sources but the sources you added didn t do that Balance is about representing all sides of a topic and the topic in the paragraph I provided is the ending scene of the movie and the interpretations from political writers about that scene One said it could be an apology for his criminal behavior the other said it was a an attempt to excuse his extra marital affair and criminal behavior The information you added do not address the topic of the ending scene of the movie and therefore have no relevance to that topic and don t provide the balance you claim they do