It is published right here it just happens to have been rejected from the journal the original was published in And it s not like this is new research which needs to go in a journal to count as published since it is an analysis of existing published research which is widely available Go into ISI and search for yourself Go through a few hundred yourself and you won t find the ratio that Oreskes says you will find I called bullshit on that study a while ago because the original data is right there to view and it doesn t match what she says it should