Sure If policy wonking is the game you want to play then perhaps you should read over WP CENSOR before you quote it WP CENSOR was designed to prevent the censoring of content objectionable to groups of people usually on religious or national grounds Images of Muhammad were unsuccessfully censored in Wikipedia s past and rightfully so since the censoring policy is as clear as day in that scenario But can you name a person on this earth that doesn t find goatse offensive Wikipedia s goal is to provide the sum of all human knowledge Why would a link not meet this goal Because humans have to burn calories to do so as it was so eloquently put by someone on the talk page There s a certain level of morality that encyclopedias are expected to adhere to and the refusal to budge on biographies of living persons censorship of bad images and many other things are bringing Wikipedia past the brink of moral bankruptcy Shouldn t a user have a say in the matter of their exposure to goatse since what has been seen can t be unseen