Support the commoner and older name in books dealing with the Asian region Support as per IOC and reducing ambiguity of name Cheers Oppose Oppose we re not in the business of imposing logic and tidiness onto names Wikipedia policy clearly states that article titles should reflect established usage To put the figures above into perspective a Google Search for Black Vulture Europe gives 31 000 hits this is the name by which the species is most widely known and usage of the two three new names is much less prevalent To my mind the solution most in line with WP policy would be to have two articles Black Vulture Old World vulture and Black Vulture New World vulture and a disambig page Any other option is surely akin to social engineering Black Vulture Europe gives 633 unique hits not 31 000 hits The search term is also misleading because it will find cases of American Black Vulture and Europe in a single page and count them Black Vulture Europe american gives only 8 940 hits Cinereous Vulture the way you searched gives 50 000 hits So established usage is obvious with the Cinereous Vulture