Your dislike of the Daily Mail is not sufficient reason to disregard it as a credible news source If you can find other news sources that reported the incident differently then do so Otherwise your edits look like an attempt to protect Ms Harman or to replace what was formerly a right wing bias with a left wing one To be clear I am not saying this claim reflects a right wing bias In fact I think the article is fairly well balanced now after all the work that has been done of late