Calling my question trolling is completely misunderstanding the problem I was describing the activities of a person that is very active with harming cdrtools This is no fun but a very problematic person is supported by the WP rules with his attacks and I am looking for a solution The persom I am talking about writes text with his WP account and text with IP numbers and the cases where he uses IP numbers look very intentional I created a log of 47 such IP based edits between December 2010 and now that verifies this behavior The person also attacks cdrtools on his personal website and he tries via anonymizing remailers to blackmail Linux distributors that asked their lawyers and thus distribute the original cdrtools instead of the buggy and unmaintained fork from Debian Regarding the licensing section In May 2004 a social attack against cdrtools was started by some people from Debian These people later came up with the false claim that there was a legal problem in cdrtools in order to distract from their social attacks They did never send any legally valid verification for their claims and many lawyers confirmed that there is no legal problem The cdrtools article however quotes the claims from laymen with the intend to create the impression that there is a modicum of truth in these claims This can not be seen as a neutral report on this Debian initiated incidence but rather as an attempt to harm cdrtools Another problem in the licensing section is the fact that it attacks cdrtools by describing activitied in an intentionally reversed timeline in order to confuse cause and reaction It would be easy to verify the real timeline as this is something that can not be faked in the internet Any attempt to make the cdrtools article neutral failed so far I understand an encyclopedia in a way that it may have to report about attacks but without becoming parts of the attackers In our case this would require to clearly mention that there is no verification for a legal problem