4 Agreed In the current version of the article the aftermath of the battle is and not necessarily ought to be the main subject of the title Assessments 13 February So why not re title this section Aftermath of the Battle Not only would re titling more accurately reflect the section s actual content but also it might help resolve the undue weight problem a Stephen makes the convoy s destruction i e the aftermath of the battle key to his assessment of the battle Stephen footnote 2 but what about the other eight sources Where exactly page numbers do they have that precise analysis b OK but why not explain what makes the wording and tone of the proposed revisions unencylopedic