You misunderstand me That some bogus material exists in an article is no excuse for not removing other bogus Nothing is allowed to stay by some magic force Wikipedia is continuously involving and we have to proceed in steps I remove bogus material when I see it i e mainly non sourced speculation It does not rule out that there are bogus I overlook and or have not the time to delete or edit Also just because something wrong has been along for a long time does not make it a precedent for other crap to be left alone Clearly it is then a matter of judgement whether one removes stuff or tags it The latter is typically done when you as editor know that a source can be dug up but the tag is left there as a reminder for youself other editors and as a cautionary warning for readers Keep up the good work I hope not that I have deleted without discussion anything you have sourced