Let me also add that while this is not a court of law there still have to be some generalized adherence to specificity I would urge a skimming of for example Wilson v Eu 1 Cal 4th 707 823 P 2d 545 4 Cal Rptr 2d 379 1992 See It s a lengthy legal opinion defining the borders of all the legislative districts in California as defined at that time Such definitions may be considered oh that s way too specific for what we need to do here at Wikipedia and obviously I am not advocating for that kind of strict definition because again this is not a court of law But vagueness and original research should not reign here because then we descend into confusions that are of no benefit to readers or editors It shouldn t be I feel this isn t Lhasa and therefore I m going to not call it Lhasa Deliberative specificity is beneficial and should not simply discarded because one feels certain areas are not Lhasa