advice The article was proposed for deletion by another editor but he neglected to notify you The reason given was contravening orders of the New Zealand High Court defamation of living persons self promotion breaches Wikipedia s policy on biographies of living persons As reviewing administrator I have declined to delete it on the ground that the case is notable since the NZ Supreme Court has accepted it for review we do not censor on the basis of court orders that have no effect in the US the other problems are fixable However it will undoubtedly be nominated for regular deletion and you need to make some improvements immediately Please read WP BLP n particular every specific statement about a person must be sourced to a third party source For a controversial statement it needs to be a published article in a news source or a court judgmentnot the allegations in a brief or a statement by a party to the case Reviews of his book in reliable publications are good sources the book itself is not Negative comment about him and about other parties must be very carefully handled Only facts must be stated not unsourced editorializing about them Siemers comments of the judges are particularly problematic It is my impression that an article of a paragraph or two might be more acceptable here but nobody can predict the result of a WP Articles for Deletion debate