Warning If you persist in editing the Ugg boots article to claim that IP Australia decided ugg boots is a generic term I will report you for vandalism The reliable sources do not report this Phoenix reports that you have had problems at another article where you edited the article to make claims that were not supported by reliable sources I have looked at the other article and its Talk page I have also carefully reviewed the sources for this article Phoenix is correct If you find a reliable source that says this provide a link and we will discuss it on the Talk page But I would like to see this IP Australia fact sheet that Phoenix and Factchk mentioned They claim that it says the opposite