I take your point my comment was really incomplete I ll chalk it up to being lazy after making it so many times in relation to Flood He s not NPOV himself but he does represent an extreme POV one that I would even call radical feminist As such he shouldn t be cited without also including mainstream countervailing views alongside him He s as much if not more activist than he is academic Citing Flood in the absence of such counterpoints is what is NPOV particularly when he or his cohort Michael Kimmel are cited as experts on masculinities giving the impression that they are providing a masculinist perspective on issues of interest to feminists when they are really just parroting the feminist perspective It s the Fox News version of Fair and Balanced Give the feminist viewpoint and then allow Flood and Kimmel to give the masculine counterpoint