I read it as the parenthetical clause within the first sentence being cited to that other source and the rest of the sentence being cited to the church s website Why we have written the lead with such a long parenthetical escapes me that just cries out for copyediting So does the whole article but I think the claim is accurately footnoted The first sentence of the next section says he did his graduate studies in Scotland and is cited to a pair of books The Worldnetdaily article used in our article says the studies in Scotland were interrupted by the return to Kenya but it could be interrupted after a masters and before a doctorate or it could be before either impossible to tell Frankly I think if we just clean up the parenthetical comment the sourcing will become clearer and the material to my eyes generally satisfies WP SELFPUB but I m not certain it passes the relevance part of the test I ve reviewed a bunch of our articles on prominent religious leaders including both those widely respected the current Pope Billy Graham and those best known for scandals Bakker Roberts and none mentioned a degree in the introduction Some don t mention degrees at all some mention them in a subsection about early life or education This fits with my general knowledge of the religious field degrees are not of great importance to a minister They may or may not equip him or her for the work but they are mostly irrelevant to their current and potential congregants