Gorgonzilla said I don t think that there is any point in this discussion each time this editor fails to find support for adding his personal research into the article he simply changes his name and starts over Maybe it s time that both of you admit that you are in fact doing this It s not just a one sided affair I m glad this article is locked but I think it s a shame it had to come that in order to keep the article from turning into a piece of trash As for my lack of civility someone needs to look in the mirror 9 23 05 4 00 UTC