I ve removed that mention of the Olympics now a rather outdated bit of promotion I ve also removed some of the material introduced by an account now blocked as a sock of One account was used to denigrate Clifford Chance the other to promote this firm see Wikipedia Sockpuppet investigations Jfmisha Archive We were left with an article whose history section relied heavily on the company web page and material copied from it to a blog neither a reliable source for our purposes dwelt at extraordinary length on nineteenth century clients and their titles and positions mentioned the Bank of England three times in three consecutive sentences and otherwise indulged in puffery and WP PEACOCK terms set every sentence in a new paragraph and was altogether so blatantly promotional that it would have embarassed Freshfields themselves And that s just one section there s more to do Re sourcing the history section is still heavily reliant on a book published by Freshfield which can t be counted a reliable source for our purposes