Evarose allow me to add my voice to the throng what you have here is a polemic essay not a factual neutral article Polemics are not permitted on Wikipedia any more than in any other reputable encyclopedia You are I believe operating off of a premise often shared by newcomers to Wikipedia that there must be some way if we d only help you navigate it for your advocacy piece to pass muster There isn t Take your Bruce Clark proposal for an example If you have the reliable sources to do so an unpublished master s thesis doesn t remotely count you can certainly write an article about Clark as a notable lawyer and activist on behalf of First Nations peoples including such details as the notorious cases in which he was involved his prison sentence and disbarment You can not cast him as a noble crusader for downtrodden peoples who proved to be the victim of smear and dirty tricks campaigns driven into exile by a corrupt government As long as you are determined to write advocacy pieces instead of neutral statements of verifiable fact backed by reliable independent third party sources then they will be subject to prompt deletion No one is telling you of course that you can t write advocacy pieces We re just telling you that such pieces have no place on Wikipedia and that you must seek other venues for their publication