Comment This real problem here is not the notability of the original literary society or even this fraternity chapter It s about the content format and behaviour of the principle editor s This needs to be addressed regardless of what title the article sits under This article has serious issues concerning its failure to adhere to Wikipedia s policy of Neutral point of view made all the worse by the serious conflict of interest represented here The treatment of this article as the property of the members of Phi Kappa Psi makes it virtually impossible for the article to be improved by outside editors All attempts in the previous version were reverted on sight Please read WP OWN Once you have written an article on Wikipedia you no longer own it It will always have to conform to Wikipedia s policies on content style and formatting not to the subject s desired image or marketing goals The citation issues have not been resolved The version of the article that has been copied here has multiple tags and rightly so Other statements in the article are referenced to sources which do not support the claim which they allegedly referencing e g the contents of footnotes 4 and 5 to name a few The article is full of Original research and Synthesis which violate key policies of Wikipedia The section The Irving vehicle of integration is a prime example of this Furthermore the article obscures the fact that the resemblance between the historical Irving Literary Society at Cornell which all sources agree ceased to exist in 1887 and the one which is now an aspect of the NY Alpha chapter of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity is in name only Ordinary not honorary membership is no longer open to all students at Cornell and is now closed to women All members of the NY Alpha chapter of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity are now automatically members of the society and only members of that fraternity can now be members of the ILS i e only males To any neutral observer these problems are very obvious which is why Wikipedia strongly discourages editing with a conflict of interest COI editing virtually never results in a good article and this is a prime example Believe it or not in its current state it reflects poorly on the fraternity s reputation rather than enhancing it Going forward I sincerely hope that those editors affiliated in any way with Phi Kappa Psi at Cornell will not resort to tactics such as sockpuppetry tag team editing and shared accounts in an attempt to exclude other editors