Yes I think that Sol has a personal POV and he has demonstrated on numerous occasions even under oath in court that he doesn t let the facts get in the way of promoting his own personal POV This is what often happens with non professional historians They have an abundance of information mainly because of the passion they have regarding the particular topic they are pursuing however they lack the professionalism to step back and review all the particular information from a neutral POV not just selecting information that supports their particular POV and discounting information that does not Taking a neutral stance is very important in order to come to conclusion that closest reflects the actual truth Undoubtably he has an abundance of information however he has demonstrated poor judgment regarding his use of this information on numerous occasions As a result we do not know where else he has viewed this subjects through a selective or distorted perspective As a result we need to discount his writings and focus on demonstrated credible sources particularly in delicate subjects such as this