Onus probandi fallacy on list of informal fallacies onus probandi is erroneously in blue because it is linked to philosophical burden of proof which is not a fallacy but the epistemic equivalence of the legal principle I tried to add the fallacy there but Denisarona reverted it NOw either you make a new entry onus probandi fallacy possibly redirecting to the english equivalent shifting the burden of proof or you add a section to previous article adding burden of proof fallacy the word philosophical is anyway inappropriate and should be changed OK btw I couldn t find a leave a message button on user talk Denisarona can you let her know Precedingunsigned comment added by Hi I reviewed my revert of your changes I reverted on the basis of the phrase I am wrong because I incorrectly viewed it as personal commentary that you included in the article I apologize for this I should have reviewed the context more before clicking on the revert button I ve restored your edits as good faith and removed my warning from your talk page Denisarona s contention and it is correct is that you should provide a source for the information that you have added or changed Thank you for your contributions By the way to leave a message on Denisarona s talk page all you have to do is to go to the page and click the edit tab at the top You can then add a new section at the end of the talk page Wikipelli it is useless to write to her I explained to you what is the problem I might add a section to the article philosophical but I can not correct the mistake in the title or make a new entry or a new redirect only you can do that btw Her contention is wrong I am surprised you say so because my source if you understood the problem is wikipedia itself I added the original Latin text and its transaltion because I happen to know Latin there is no source for that So let s recap you must copy definition explanation from list of fallacies to philosofical delete burden of proof or make a new article burden of proof fallacy copy there the explanation and make a new redirect from onus probandi later on I can improve the article If it is not yet clear tell me what is the problem OK Ok I m trying to sort this out But a couple of things while I do that 1 I d feel better about helping if you didn t tell me that I must do this rather than ask me to do it and 2 what is keeping you from making the changes yourself Keep your shirt on wikipelli 1 I am a not a native speaker mother tongue is Latin you must later I can means only you can after that I am able to if you do not like it change it to you ought to if you desire that I OK 2 Denisarona and wikipelli I am new here I do not know what I am allowed to do and how to do it you are forgetting a trivial detail I got two warnings in 5 minutes The bottom line is I am helping you to make a more decent article you are just helping me to help you Is that correct I am joking I imagine you must deal with trolls and vandals all day Let me know when you are ready btw if I want to give not a source but a real example from web can I put the link at the explanation or I must put it in a note the latter would be above my possibilities Ta Ok I ll look into it N