If you still want my opinion I d say your recent changes are an improvement you have more references and the tone is more encyclopaedic For the Introduction it s OK but unless you are wanting to make her illegitimacy the defining feature of her life you could do worse than use the format used by the admin who wrote the original draft For the Birth section if you still want to make the Andrew Thomson connection try She was through her maternal grandparents the 5th generation descendant of Andrew Thomson reputed to be the lover of Anna Empress of Russia 1693 1740 its more succint Her names though Vera and Nina have a number of meanings Do you have evidence that these in particular were intended by her parents Or that they had particular significance or her If not it s best left out Similarly Mothers connections unless any of these people had some significant impact on Lombardi s life it s irrelevant She s described as a socialite well connected goes without saying Reputed daughter your Madsen quote is OK but then you added your interpretation which isn t as I said before A quote should be used to emphasize a point made or to provide the exact wording so there is no doubt If you then have to tell what the author is saying then something s wrong somewhere The rest of the stuff down to Lombardi s status reads better but simply lacks relevance If you are trying to make a case against Rosa Baring for having sex with a minor which I m guessing was illegal even in Victorian times it s still all circumstantial His parents never preferred charges did they Or did he ever acknowledge the child And I hadn t twigged until now is it Chanel s biographers who are making this claim not Lombardi s How reliable is that As for the WWII section again it doesn t matter that her second cousin was plotting to overthrow Hitler or that the son of another second cousin tried to kill Rommel if there s no evidence Lombardi was involved it shouldn t be here Likewise the Churchill Mussolini correspondence The article doesn t need you to add German transcripts it needs evidence of Lombardi s involvement for which you ve said flat out there is none If you feel there is hard evidence this correspondence exists and is something more than a wish you were here postcard from Chartwell then write an article on it if you feel here is a controversy that has notability write an account just make sure it satisfies a neutral point of view But it doesn t belong here