A few thoughts I sort of think there needs to be some kind of resolution to the fighting over this article This log is beyond absurd and more to the point when I ve seen similar protection logs the dispute s has have usually ended up going to ArbCom That s not something I imagine anyone wants Arbitrators have limited patience too As far as further disputes go I really can t imagine what there is left to fight over From the point of view of someone more or less on the outside who s never seen the film and in all honesty doesn t give two flying fucks about it either this article is not that bad Ok so not FA standard nor A class or whatever but Wikipedia has far worse trash for you to go out there and fix Ok so that academic reception stuff is at least in my opinion a bit too long though the film obviously does have some notable critics Mr Dawkins But hey it s a New Age film when we write an encyclopaedia article on such a topic we should probably use a slightly different language game than we would in an article on mainstream science And be realistic there is no need to explicitly keep on hammering out the fact the science in the film is tosh Most people will click on those links to the Ramtha School and JZ Knight articles Those who don t you won t persuade anyway In conclusion this article is not a perfect model of NPOV Big deal not Wikipedia has far worse articles This one is by and large ok Maybe at some future stage we can come back and trim a little bit of the criticism which is at least in my opinion excessive But the unwavering obsession some people appear to have with this article is totally unwarranted It s reasonably fair both to fans of the film and to those who hate it Is there any need to keep on with the quarrels and edit wars I warn you if you do keep going and this does go to arbitration I suspect the arbitrators reactions will be far from pleasant particularly since some of the names of the chaps fighting here have come up in previous cases With all respect