Or more simply WP AGF Trust that these successfully nominated people will use the tools in an appropriate manner and that they will seek advice accept revision without drama After all the RfA process is tough too tough arguably and they have got the tools because the consensus was thus If the consensus changes then that will emerge I really really doubt that there is any issue here I ve seen Anna ask loads of things of loads of people and I ve also seen her apply what she has learned over the years She is a class act and indeed the very fact that she has often dithered about offers to nominate etc because she doesn t like drama is perhaps the most significant underlying rationale for giving her the tools