Emerson7 Milliot eww that vandalism thing was wrong it was intended to be a roll back mea culpa on that however with regard to the links though the sources may indeed be valid it was inline linking and weird formatting that were the target i and others have had several sessions and conversations with milliot about how he tends to leave articles in shambles over and over copyvios link farming random links quote farming edits with horribly batter english and grammar inexpicable article name changes etcc etc he s a nice guy i m sure but it is very frustrating when he continues to cause the same problems because he either doesn t read or doesn t understand policy that and no one to tends wants to deal with him just giving up trying to help in exasperation Emerson7 interesting choice of words Emerson7 I believe it was you who kept reverting back Nagyvary to a Stradivari article Which really had no place of being there since it was about his experiments which have been rebuked by experts in the field And now you are waging war on relevant information which I have contributed to in other articles which you keep deleting Shame on you There is no reason for this as most people here are really trying to make wiki a better source of information Deleting valuable information after it has been added is really not nice