From the edit of WarrenPlatts at 15 01 hours on the 27th of June to his edit at 02 03 hours on the 29th there were 7 in line citations added but the numerous removals of material with citations left 78 fewer citations The trend is obvious The removals tended to be information potentially opposed to undertaking manned missions to Mars thus converting the article into an advocacy piece supporting WarrenPlatts POV That s right removing Robert s content tends to remove information opposed to undertaking crewed missions to Marsafter all that is his whole agenda However to say that turn the article into an advocacy piece is quite a stretch lol