Lookit truthteller your contribution is a from a creationist point of view POV and b unscientific as in patent nonsense Your belief represents a minority Don t answer that evolution is a system of belief it is not and has never been You pick out one aspect of indirect dating and neglect the overwhelming rest You present answersingenesis and incorrect news websites as sources Only publications in a PEER REVIEWED journal add something to the discussion There are thousands of articles on wikipedia about evolution in general open your eyes Just as an aside what do you think of the rest of the article If you would be consequent you would have to edit 90 of this article heck even the taxobox that pink thing on top is based on evolutionary principles Of course this proves you are totally ignorant of dinosaurs and biology in general Oh and please provide a source for your Canadian and Alaskan unfossilized dinosaur bones The mammoth is mummified the T rex bones are fossilized The bones have been demineralized after which they found the spectacular soft tissue Your argument is as stupid as the bones of the chicken I ate last week also have some soft tissue left which makes dinosaurs contemporary to us And it s very strange you accept the mammoth to be 30 000 years old while I thought you can t see further than 6 000 years I normally don t engage on creationists because they re stubborn as a donkey