In the article Conspiracy theory we can read this paragraph The term conspiracy theory is considered by different observers to be a neutral description for a conspiracy claim a pejorative term used to dismiss such a claim and a term that can be positively embraced by proponents of such a claim The term may be used by some for arguments they might not wholly believe but consider radical and exciting The most widely accepted sense of the term is that which popular culture and academic usage share certainly having negative implications for a narrative s probable truth value So there are negative implications in the term according to the most widely accepted sense of the term The question is over whether Conspiracy Theory is a term intended to be used as a perjorative or whether it is an official term for describing a certain kind of theory The term Conspiracy theories is generally used by debunkers who contest the theories while the researchers who support the theories never use it they use the term skepitcism This topic has been fiercely debated since the page was created There was a vote on this when this page was first created and since the term does not show up on Words to avoid the consensus thus far has been that it is an acceptable term for use on this page Some arguments against the title The term has objectively negative implications there can be no discussion about this When a topic is controversial and this is the case the title must be neutral you can use title with negative implications when you speak about nazis or pedophilia because in those case there is an almost unanimous consensus they are not controversial topic If the topic is controversial you must use a title that is accepted by all the point of views It s not correct to say that topic of the article are theories about conspiracy the article is about the skeptic POV about the official account alternative theories are part of the content of the article not the main topic It wouldn t be neutral to dedicate the article to theories about conspiracies even if the article wanted to do so to put emphasis on the theories is a way to discredit the skeptic POV it s more difficult to believe someone when he says I have a theory rather than when he just says I m skeptic