Many parts of the article contain strongly biased POVs rather than facts For example the statement explaining that the king s philosophy is to legitimize his and the royal family s extravagant life has no proven evidence of the relationship between such two things and bluntly jump to the conclusion Whether it is an abusing act on a neutral free encyclopedia for political or personal purpose I think any intellectual person reading it will be able to figure out However what I can say myself is that a judgement without trial deos not deserve to be anywhere in civilized world