No crime or complicity as I said above The rulebook holds no one to these things as opposed to what personal principles would ask of us off line It s surely ironical that I appear to be defending an editor who I privately thought made an extremely poor judgement of questionable intent in reporting you while grilling you when my clashes with you from the beginning of your entry into wiki can not belie the very hiugh estimation of your scholarship and commitment to the project I and many others think your presence here invaluable to the I P area But I just hold our side to standards of clarity and precision I ve never expected from the other side since many there seem more enchanted by the power games people can play with an intricate rulebook than with the fundamental aims of wikipedia My remonstrations with you are extensive precisely because I hold your work and sense of unyielding principle on sticking points in high esteem I know where you re coming from In the real world I never back down either a similar stubbornness once cost me a lucrative alternative career and I am not asking you to Mate sit out a month or two keep helping anyone on your page with coordinates and any gen that ask for and make a succinct aesthetically persuasive caps no expostulations clear syntax and precise words note for a review of Jehochman s highy punitive but in wiki terms when working the rulebook over someone s crimsheet completely coherent sentence Your record of infringement is in terms of gravity one of piddling oversights or trivial rashness and in any sane world would if put in the balance against the weight of your contributions to article creation and improvement shoot upwards as featherweight peccadillos At this point all I can do is leave it at that and create another section which you may or may not care to use after 2 months have expired June 1 The undersigned ask for a review of AK s sanction A rapid decision on a small point on wiki law was made regarding a trivial and contested act in which he was accused of drive by editing He has without calling for administrative review sat out twice the length of one sanction imposed that by Sandstein Those who think the quality of his work invaluable for the I P project ask that the year long sanction be reviewed and scaled back drastically as wholly disproportionate to the contested infraction The undersigned confirm their faith in his bona fides and their belief that the infraction was and remains questionable