Trinitarian Interpretation and Oneness Reply section I ve split this section into the Patripassianism section and the Common viewpoints section as it seemed to be dealing with 2 different topics I am moving the Patripassianism section to the bottom of the article and the Common viewpoints section immediately below the introduction Patripassianism The main problem with this section and with much of the article is that it seems to be written from the perspective of Oneness Pentecostalism defending its views from Trinitarian arguments It is not written in a neutral tone There is only one citation given listed as 3 in the References section Common viewpoints Both viewpoints offered here need to be sourced