My esteem for Jim Shapiro has absolutely nothing to with it just as his book has absolutely nothing to do with Palladis Tamia The SAQ is a fringe theory While it is perfectly acceptable to discuss whatever implications PT may have on the SAQ in an article about the SAQ in its various permutations it violates WP ONEWAY to bring it gratuitously into an article about it You also might want to read the WP BRD page and the WP BRDWRONG page My mention of the Geneva Bible was in way of analogy It s not all about you but next time I reach for a comparison I will not mention any of your work