People are being very selective about application If the assertion is that this article should be redirected according to policy follow that very policy where has the AFD discussion occurred as mandated by that very same policy Remember that redirection is contrary to policy and ultimately AN I worthy unless you can legitimately assert You have searched for sources and not found any Given this has been going on for 12 months I find it difficult to believe the pro deletionists have found nothing in all that time If a redirect takes place the contents are merged Among other things this implies the target is actually edited as a result of the merge It does not mean that circular links to the old article for more information are left in place unedited The redirect is non controversial or had been discussed at AFD Have any of these conditions been met