Well err let s not talk attitude I enjoy editing about Rawat probably less than you do neither do I enjoy editing your article that was my point and explaining why I do nonetheless Scholars not wanting to look beyond Wikipedia itself i e not wanting to look to the texts used as sources in Wikipedia are not Wikipedia s target audience The disclaimer should make this clear Wikipedia does not want serious scholars to quote Wikipedia directly that does more harm than good to Wikipedia That being said I do think Bibliography of Prem Rawat and related organizations superior to at least the Wikipedia bibliography article is more up to date and more complete although yours has a few advantages too as I pointed out Having a POV is not a problem disclosing it is not a problem even required in some circumstances as you are well aware bringing it to article editing is Instead of vaguish complaints show me the edits where I did