I don t think article length has anything to do with whether we should mention this or not As I said earlier balance it out with a mention of how many thousands of games he s reviewed and how he s a respected member of the Gamespot crew if you like but I still think there isn t a good enough reason to pretend that there was no controversy it s really not relevant whether the site itself referred to it or not For instance you re not going to get a government saying we did this thing wrong and a load of people disagreed with us over it but that does not mean that that did not happen