HI Jess for the record You said I d suggest taking the other advice you ve received from me and Andythegrump seriously Andy advised me I suggest you let the matter drop before you are obliged to AndyTheGrump talk 02 30 9 January 2013 UTC Many people dispute that in noticeboard and I produced 4 reelable sources of equal weight journals almost as important as the Lancet and others which state something different things about homeopathy And again for the record according to wikipedia policy as long a different point of view is documented in a major source Lancet Annals of Internal Medicine immediately is qualified for inclusion and reporting If one wants to edit according to NPOV of course Now I have to stop before I m obliged to like you and Andy said Now I know how consensus is achieved in controversial articles Best regards