GA Review This review is transcluded from Talk R Bancoult v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs No 2 GA1 The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review Reviewer The article appears generally neutral but see below stable well written and the one image is in order Comments The use of the word exiled appears contentious To a lay person that implies politically or even militarily hostile ejection of a person from their country This does not appear to be on that level nor does it appear to be ejection from their country but from one territory to another within a country While I personally sympathise with people in this situation i don t think exiled is right The fact that it was used by the minority judges but i presume not the majority underlines its potentially tendentious nature The public and academic reaction to the decision was a negative one this is followed by a quote but not a cite to make clear who is being quoted The article doesn t seem to say anything about final effects Eg were there Chagossians who had returned and were now again relocated I m assuming not Any other effects Apologies alternative arrangements offered by governments any announcement from the Chagossian refugee group That s about it A very interesting case