Yawn As far as ownership goes I have accepted on good faith your cited edit concerning the Babes in Toyland project despite the fact that the highly reliable Los Angeles Times online archive does not evidence the article you cite whatever pertinent word string is used Still we ll take it And I ll go down to the library and check out the hard copy for myself As for your primary plaint There are two standard reference books on the history of RKO Pictures the subject of this article The standard Lasky history of RKO says not a word about The Runaround The standard Jewell history film by film inventory of RKO says the following on topic Why this minor fluff of a film was made in colour remains anybody s guess p 38 The leading mutli decade scholarly history of Hollywood as an industrial and technological enterprise is The Classical Hollywood Cinema Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960 by David Bordwell Janet Staiger and Kristin Thompson It says not a word about The Runaround The leading decade specific scholarly history of Hollywood as an industrial and technological enterprise is Grand Design Hollywood as a Modern Business Enterprise 1930 1939 written and edited by Tino Balio It says not a word about The Runaround Given the most pertinent reliable sources in the field it is readily arguable that The Runaround like the similar Fanny Foley Herself does not merit mention in this article at all Not a single word That they do appear here is largely out of compromise with your insistent pushing of the topic under you former guise as see and AllTalking Contributions It is your POV that it is by both Wikipedia and all reasonable standards non neutral Tag removed Sayonara Zosimus