9 May 2012 UTC This is an encyclopedia not an opinion platform You re making a lot of assumptions about what this person thinks thought feels most of which are not backed up by reliable sources All we have from the sources at this time is that Gabel plans to begin living as a woman will soon begin the process of transition and will eventually take the name Laura Jane Grace This means that these things are to happen in the presumably near future that they have not yet begun and that the name has not yet been changed I do not see where the article is misgendering the subject Gabel just announced a plan to transition to living as Laura Jane Grace The article covers this and will make the transition to she Laura Jane in the biography portion as the events and coverage warrant All this stuff about She never was a man even when she herself thought she was is your own point of view A biographical encyclopedia article shouldn t have a point of view it should present facts This person was born Tom Gabel lived most of their life as Tom Gabel and very recently announced a plan to transition to living as Laura Jane Grace As much as you may perceive it as insensitive to use the male gender pronoun in referring to this person s life as Tom Gabel it is nonetheless accurate and appropriate from an encyclopedic standpoint I understand that this is a sensitive topic about which many people have strong views but Wikipedia s articles are no place for strong views 07 35