In principle I don t agree with the sentiment about name calling In practice I like very much what you edited and it is an excellent addition to the article If I may say so it definitely moved the article toward another Featured Article nomination But it is not there yet My concern lies in the idea that we should avoid including a position labeling it name calling What this does is set up an automatic bias and POV It also means that we as editors are taking a position that it is name calling and it is not factually correct and I don t know if it is name calling or correct And it means that very positive positive and balanced commentary will be allowed and perhaps some very carefully worded negative commentary But very negative commentary is then excluded This means that if a number of the most prominent atheists in the western world or perhaps world are united in their strong condemnation it will not be allowed in an encyclopedia which is supposed to capture all notable ideas The following sentence presents a very positive position Biographers Mormon and non Mormon agree that Smith was one of the most influential charismatic and innovative figures in American religious history It would be unfortunate and very un encyclopedic if we keep that but exclude a very negative position In any case I m quite satisfied that your edits addressed in a significant part the POV issues that exist I personally would not vote for it to become a featured article without including even in passing the atheists position But that s just me In any case thank you again for the addition It is very welcome