Brief comments since there is a bit much text here The Washington Post URL is fine pointing at the first pagethat s where the article starts On the father The Robesonian article which is an AP article and also ran in the Washington Post calls him a devout Muslim and that s the end of it Built or designed a mosque that s really not so to the point but I ve changed it The article in Times Daily calls him an architect Then we call him an architect until that is proven wrong accusations such as Caner being a pathological liar and therefore we should doubt everything those are not helpful I ve removed the teenager part since it s clear that that was hardly truebut stuffing an article full of he claimed is not helpful either and only contributes to what is rightly called a name and shame coloring Oh one final thing about the things missing in my version we DO NOT have to list every single damn thing that happened in this man s life every thing he said every thing that was exposed That he mistranslated cited incorrectly whatever I have tried to cover that in a condensed and readable way the links to the articles are there for further detail It is not Wikipedia s job to cover everything Thanks