It shouldn t be about convincing but presenting arguments Finally some apparent support for the Hilton suggestion but I think it is wise to note The first reference states This I think is at least a significant part of his legacy The second reference only makes one use of Hilton and that within comments Usage in the third reference is in a later paragraph to say This seems to me to be a reference to name as given at birth and not to commonly used designations used in life I could be wrong but I think that there may be a tendency in obituaries to make use of this type of reference