The reason for the he says is simple attribution needful in this case but alternatives welcome It is too simplistic to say that the Laudabiliter deniers were Irish nationalists and Roman Catholics with an agenda since the opposite could also be suggested There is only one source for the Laudabiliter Giraldus Cambrensis who is wholly unreliable and certainly was working to an agenda The tag that was placed on the article says Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information but offers nothing else It suggests that there is newly available information and that the article does not reflect recent events so what and were is it