Archived Either administrators or rules Wikipedia talk Requested moves Closure review Wikipedia talk Requested moves Talk Trollhunter Talk Lovin You Minnie Riperton song Move Talk All That Jazz Discussion of the RM Talk Firestarter Talk Loving You disambiguation Talk It s Great to Be Alive discussing only opponents views not supporters like me as I favor proposal based on familiarity merit and significance Nothing useful as the closer was accurate on this and I don t get this I wonder who is wrong me the administrators or the rules Do we have to rely on judgments of administrators who may or may not interpret discussions correctly I ve been think about reporting on JHunterJ but I don t know Lately he sees me as a crusader of renaming but in spite of flimsy reasonings in the past I ve tried to point out how each title may or may not have merits There are differing views in this area You will have to learn to live with that There are concerns about closure judgments by JHunter but my proposals are not the only ones I could be wrong George like I said I m not very experienced in this area but I think Elen is saying that some people will just disagree about the issue On Wikipedia people use hyperbole and over the top rhetoric when it isn t warranted so someone may call you disruptive for bringing up the issue when you aren t being disruptive but just expressing a different opinion In this case even though you were accused of that you probably weren t doing anything wrong The problem George Ho is not that each title may or may not have merits It s that we have guidelines and policies for evaluating those merits and rather that two appropriate courses of action either apply the existing guidelines and policies or raise your objections and suggestions for improving them on their talk pages you instead make move requests without regard to those guidelines and policies and in particular immediately re request several moves that did not answer your questions to your satisfaction The WP RM process is not there to cycle over and over again until you ve accepted the results And if you have a question about what the right title might be for an article rather than proposing a move with several options and abstaining sometimes even explicitly from supporting any of them first open a regular non RM section on the talk page to ask for other watchers opinions What s the use of making a regular discussions anyway I have begun to trust my instincts and words more than I trust people because I have wise brain all right And why do I have to trust anybody especially you Imagine you as my mentor I would decline your offers as temporary mentor over and over In fact I went to first because that s all I can do I trust him I m not wise enough to know how to discuss anything other than proposals I depend on templates because that s all I can do If you are not interested in my input it might reflect your wisdom to avoid statements like I ve been think about reporting on JHunterJ which tend to gain my attention I would still recommend you not start relying solely on your instincts on WP just yet What do you mean What I said Which part needs rephrasing To what type of statements were you referring Well sin