Ok dokey This revert puts us square on the discuss portion of the BRD cycle I feel that my changes aren t broadly transformative to the POV of the article that they improve the flow for reasons posted above and that they can be supported by either side of this business I see that this change specifically could generate some consternation and I m more than happy to put that on the back burner though a big quote shouldn t be leading the section IMO If I don t see some discussion here I ll assume that silence implies consent and go back to improving the article