OK this is my stop Back to the recent changes for me I d suggest someone come in and hat this entire conversation as it s drifted far off topic I d also suggest Ries focus less on trying to win a semantic debate and more on opening his mind up to the fact that he is arguing that threatening to shoot up a school is perfectly legal or otherwise justified He seems to be under the impression that there are mitigating factors in which this act would be ok There are no mitigating factors where it s ok to threaten to shoot up a school even if it s an empty threat it s still against the law I ll WP AGF that you aren t here for an agenda and say this no one is suggesting every Gamergate supporter is a criminal or even that any Gamergate supporter is criminal We are suggesting that threatening to shoot up a school is criminal no matter who did it and asserting that in WP s voice is obviously ok This is the word s very definition Of involving or having the nature of crime Threatening to shoot up a school fits all three criteria Best of luck trying to convince other editors otherwise