If there was notable public criticism of Wikipedia on these grounds however specious we may think they are then Wikipedia is naughty because it contains sexually explicit content would be a reasonable section to add to this article For example if Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson or a notable politician etc were to complain Certainly Wikipedia contains articles on topics obscure sexual practices pornography that Encyclopaedia Brittanica won t touch Britannica at least the concise online version lacks an article on the esteemed Ron Jeremy for instance However until Wikipedia is subject to notable public criticism which we can verifiably document with reliable sources adding such criticism to the list isn t appropriate If and when they do I ll be happy to add it even though I think such criticism is foolish demogoguery