Got your message Thanks for the note as it happens I have the Fairfield article on my watchlist so I d have seen your comments and edits anyhow If you re not familiar with the watchlist it s a good way to monitor pages for changes you can add and remove pages from it manually or you can set My preferences so that every page you edit is automatically added to it And while I m dispensing advice Notice how this comment is indented from the one above it That s done by putting a colon at the beginning of each paragraph you can see it in this case if you switch into edit mode Additional colons produce additional indentation and that makes it easier to keep track of who s saying what in a talk page discussion I ve edited the talk page for Fairfield to indent your response from my original comment if I add something further I ll put two colons in front of it to indent it even further Now to your remarks re the Fairfield photos I m afraid I have to chide you a bit on your assumption that I was vandalizing the article One of the core tenets of Wikipedia is Assume good faith Of course there are situations that re clearly vandalism but if there s any room for doubt WP FAITH That goes double if the editor in question has a record of non vandalism If you d checked my user contributions click on Ammodramus then find User contributions under Toolbox at left you d have seen that I ve contributed a great deal of non vandalizing content to articles on Nebraska including adding photos to the articles on several hundred Nebraska towns Moreover from my first reversion of your edit I added an edit summary which isn t the usual practice among vandals When I saw your removal of the photo without an edit summary I was inclined to suspect vandalism on your part however when I checked your user contributions I saw that you d made useful contributions in the past so were probably not engaging in deliberate vandalism this time I have to disagree with it is not good etiquette to remove someone else s photo and replace it with your own ADDING a photo to the page is one thing but removing my photo was inappropriate In the future please refrain from removing other people s images from Wikipedia entries From the standpoint of Wikietiquette changing or removing a photo is no different than changing or removing text As with text edits one should add an edit summary and the change is of course subject to discussion reversion further changes etc but there s no presumption that the original photo is necessarily the best one I ll justify my photo change at the article s talk page Thanks again for the note letting me know about your comment there I hope you don t mind my offering you advice my hope was to help and encourage you since we need more editors working on Nebraska especially outstate Nebraska subjects