Hi Prhartcom A GA reviewer is not suppose to get involved in editing disputes On the contrary if the article is not stable that is grounds for failing a GA review until any disputes are resolved I will say that it is very difficult to work in any contentious topic on Wikipedia and a company such as this might fall under those parameters As discussed the article should not include primary sources like press releases as the sole source for contentious material like lawsuits however the best way to further the discussion is to see if secondary sources can be found to replace the primary ones If not you ll have to talk it out with Rhode Island If that is unsuccessful and you still want to bring it up to GA you would need to get additional outside input to establish a consensus using noticeboards or other processes