I made a mass restoral of Danny s removals None of the removals were commentators praising Reigns many of the removals were criticisms Some removals seemed to me to be whitewashing CM Punk saying Reigns was meant to be put over as strong was not a criticism Accusations of the WWE rigging was not a criticism either and that s quoted from the source The final 3 being booed of the 2014 Rumble was gone as well Everything removed was reliably sourced May I point you to WP WELLKNOWN Roman Reigns is assuredly well known In the case of public figures there will be a multitude of reliable published sources and BLPs should simply document what these sources say If an allegation or incident is noteworthy relevant and well documented it belongs in the article even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it If you can not find multiple reliable third party sources documenting the allegation or incident leave it out Criticism of Reigns and his character is well documented and has occurred in virtually every industry specific reliable source in WP PW RS except Pro Wrestling Illustrated which is not readily available online and even mainstream sources like TV com