No Gun Ri Massacre edits Hello I for one welcome your recent edits at the No Gun Ri Massacre article which seem designed to improve accuracy and clarity in contrast to another contributor s penchant for untruths and cover up But I ll quibble with two of your latest Why remove the page reference rp 113 from the Committee footnote It s standard practice and there are page references on more than a half dozen other Committee footnotes in the article In my opinion the inserted reference to the date of U S treaty obligations under Geneva is unnecessary wordy in an article already much too long and potentially confusing to readers who may ask whether the article is suggesting that the U S was duplicitous in saying it would abide by Geneva that the Army knew it wasn t legally obliged and so would go ahead and kill refugees It s just not essential even though accurate unlike the dreadful stuff WeldNeck has dumped into the article Thanks Charles J Hanley