Ok My interest is in verifying the information that was requested My bias is investigative journalism I investigate and check up facts I have been checking up on facts on Wikipedia on many articles and removing arguments and fitting NPOV recommendations to the articles I know about I check up on articles that I know something about I also know a bit about NLP and have learned a lot more recently I and others here have had wild acusations chucked at us for no apparent reason apart from the fact that we are not particularly promotional editors Now lets have some honesty from you As per our discussion on my talkpage the IP checker showed your IP is Australian and mine is Dutch After a brief investigation on Wikipedia a minute or so ago I found the only term Comaze is a firm promoting NLP in Australia You and Comaze have spent the last few weeks covering up reliable and relevant yet negative facts and views about NLP So now its all open and honest I have been learning a lot more about NPOV policy the last few days and I have to say that you or Comaze seem to me to be fighting hard against the inclusion of all relevant views User Woohookitty did say that this article had too much promo and argument and I am here to repair that and other articles At the top of this section I appealed for fairness and balance after inclusion of all relevant views You have fought against that appeal for reasonable discussion and inclusion and you have just deleted a whole lot of straight reporting in favour of your and Comazes own opinion and commentary Stop working against NPOV policy stop deleting relevant views and start adding some sources to the views you want included Then we can get on with discussing balance and fairness