You tried to explain what That you re fabricating sources and misrepresenting them That you introduced those same figures Vituzzu refers to as neo fascist hyperbole 250 000 350 000 was your edit I happen to agree with the figures in Vituzzu s summary Note the difference between 190 000 250 000 and your own I also don t buy all this edited by respectable institutions nonsense you re peddling That book was just plain published its not a peer review publication For years now on this article both Yugoslav and Italian sources are not used without attribution of nationality for reasons of WP THIRDPARTY and NPOV and have not been for years they pretty much cancel each other out If you really need to introduce controversial claims here than surely you can find a non Italian Yugoslav author who agrees with you To be clear its fine using Yugoslav Italian refs to reference the Italian Yugoslav point of view As in Slovene historian XY holds there were 40 000 refugees or Italian author Corni states this or that I can not and will not under any circumstances agree to base our lede on authors that belong to one side of this controversial international dispute There are sources aplenty that belong to neither Let us move on to Ballinger probably the best source on this Oh and P s Silvio I did not actually edit the article added something then removed it And as for Djilas your basic facts are accurate but your text is again disgustingly biased and misrepresentative Djilas was a Yugoslav dissident an opponent of the Yugoslav government that must be made clear his statements while certainly noteworthy must be viewed as claims and be clearly attributed to him not reported as facts