1 Good But I do think we should wait a day in the name of consensus for any last comments 2 I think that the title should be Pope Michael not Pope Michael I since he is more commonly referred to as Pope Michael and the whole point of the namechange is to conform to the common name policy 3 I agree that he is not at least from a scholarly religious or historical point of view more notable than the Coptic pope However as you mentioned the Coptic pope reigned in the 700s whereas the American conclavist is a contemporary figure I think it s fair to say that he is more notable to the average person than the Coptic pope of the 700s the Coptic gets about 7 pageviews per day while the American gets about 60 Therefore I actually do think that we should bestow the Pope Michael page upon David Bawden and create a new Pope Michael disambiguation page