Jesus Christ Why didn t you just say so about ten thousands reverts ago Ten thousand Like two edits Using Jesus Christ could be construed as swearing I don t care but someone might Listen constantly re contributing an image you created and thus probably your dog to an article without providing any talk justification when it is hotly contested is not okay Listen you re the admitted deletionist and do it on the fly without thought And which image are you referring to Hotly contested Where d you get that from As if it s an administrative hot subject In the future if you d simply discussed with me that patchwork is a different type even if it is the same color as the infobox image I could have listened to reason Your sentence does not make sense How can I in the future have discussed past tense anything with you Plus I did research to find that image was different patchwork vs blue But simply reverting to a poor image of what is most likely your pet is not going to just set without discussion Poor image Which image is poor What if it is my dog Does that detract from true content Might I remind you I fixed your photo Now that was a poor image I spaced out the image some to avoid image stacking placing image one on top of the other which is something expressly discouraged That s good I guess resolution has a lot to do with that As if I m a Wiki terrorist I m not doing it because I m destructive What resolution are you using and by coat types I mean the simplest definition variations in coat either in pattern texture or color You didn t specify you just said coat types Color is not a type Do you own a dog Back to my porno I go Noles1984