As stated above I am not taking Buffadren s side in this I am with you Bogdaniusca and yesterday reverted to your version of the page However you gave a particularly bad example There is no evidence that the 20 people were killed and that the statement which you quoted added by MariusM without proposal or prior discussion are true We only have one man s word for it from a self published webpage which purports to be an interview However the interview doesn t appear anywhere else has no sources and is not published by the interviewer Besides it is badly formatted and full of typos spelling mistakes I propose moving it here to talk until the editor can substantiate the statement according to accepted Wikipedia practice To Buffadren See above You can make a proposal here on this page Then let us work on it here to see if an acceptable phrasing can be developed which there is general consensus on Don t expect everyone to agree as some people will always oppose everything no matter what it is But if 3 4th of the recently active editors on this page are in disagreement with you that should tell you something