the list of reasonable attemtps is rather short The language is likely Minoan which is itself unknown which explains why we have no idea what the text says The script is almost certainly syllabic possibly with stray logograms Personally I am rather convinced that D 02 identifies personal names so that we d have a list of 16 names or so followed by a short text containing another 3 4 names Character names Evertype I am glad there is a Unicode proposal underway but as always I think that Unicode names not to mention proposed Unicode names are not notable enough to be listed in the presentation of an alphabet rather once the alphabet is encoded there can be a separate Unicode section as on Runic alphabet Ge ez alphabet and many other articles offtopic note for the record I further think that fanciful Unicode names are a rather unhappy choice for ancient scripts it would be much better to encode them just by their commonly used numberings Anatolian hieroglyphs nos 1 524 Phaistos glyphs 1 46 Cretan syllabograms 1 96 and case in point Cuneiform Borger 1 598 or similar it is a nightmare to find the glyph you are looking for otherwise