5 May 2009 UTC Sorry I don t see how the quote verifies any claim about splinter groups as it doesn t mention anything splintering Nor does the quote verify the claim that any of the groups is a descendant of any other This brief quote is quite a slender reed on which to base any claim about the groups If it s just one sentence in a long chapter it suggests the topic of these groups isn t that important Which would be understandable since the NACM and the super duper extreme straights don t exist any more as groups 07 15