I m not entirely sure that the bit about the Thinking Christian blog really belongs in the Wikipedia article and have thus far shied away from including it For several reasons 1 It was as you mentioned largely ignored and therefore not significant 2 it might give people the impression that Dr Steel is anti Christian perhaps fostering hostility between Christians and Dr Steel s fanbase or giving Christians the idea that they are not welcome as fans both untrue and 3 the writer of the blog himself admitted that the article was largely tongue in cheek I also don t think a section of negative backlash towards the Dr Steel persona is a good idea period for then we would of necessity have to also include the very thing that got this article put on protected status in the first place