Appreciate your input on whether Doctors Opposing Circumcision meets WP GNG Hi Northamerica1000 I ve seen you do really good work at WP AFD and I wanted to get your input on whether Doctors Opposing Circumcision meets WP GNG This is a new article by the relatively inexperienced user On his User Talk page I ve pointed him to WP GNG and tried to get him to engage on it but haven t had success doing so In the box below is my review of the article sourcing as it currently stands DOC PR press release Denniston GC Doctors Opposing Circumcision D O C NOCIRC Newsletter Spring Summer 1996 passing mention Miller L BeliefWatch First Cut Newsweek May 6 2007 brief quote from DOC president Denniston Ostrom CM The circumcision decision Merits of procedure debated Seattle Times July 9 2003 brief quote from DOC director Geisheker Ostrom CM Circumcision foes doubt practice can halt AIDS spread Seattle Times August 23 2006 passing mention Skidmore S Circumcision case What does boy want Seattle Times January 26 2008 letter to the editor by Geisheker Letters Editor Times article on circumcision in Washington draws ire Seattle Times August 18 2006 brief quote from Geisheker Ostrom CM Circumcision benefits outweigh risks pediatrics report says Seattle Times August 27 2012 letter to the editor by Geisheker Ceisheker JV There s good concern for not circumcising boys Washington Post January 21 2010 no mention of DOC Boldt v Boldt 176 P 3d 388 SC Oregon 2008 passing mention Davis D Fathers foreskins and family law Lahey Clinic Journal of Family Law 2008 16 2 4 7 no mention of DOC Diekema DS Boldt v Boldt A pediatric ethics perspective J Clin Ethics 2009 20 3 251 7 PMID 19845198 no mention of DOC Dolgin JL Where Is the child Circumcision and custody in Boldt v Boldt J Clin Ethics 2009 20 3 244 50 PMID 19845197 DOC selfpub Anonymous Genital Integrity Policy Statement Seattle Doctors Opposing Circumcision 2008 DOC selfpub Anonymous All I see is brief mentions and one sentence quotes from individuals associated with the organization but not significant coverage of the organization itself Sugarcube73 on his user talk page has thrown up a list of other sources most of which fail WP RS as blogs chat forum posts etc or they re self published PR etc The article itself suffers from COI editing lack of sourcing WP SPIP and WP SELFPUB 5 the article should not be based primarily on selfpub The usual remedy is to edit the article and use the significant coverage in reliable sources but they don t exist My attempts to find better sourcing on Google News and Google Scholar turned up next to nothing What s your take on this Should the article go to AFD Can you find any better sourcing We d really appreciate your input and if you could please respond at as that s where all the conversation has been taking place Thanks much