You requested the direct quotations and they are important in demonstrating that my additions are not just my views By your same logic all the external links should be removed which the quotes were extracted from along with the rest of your entire article which also has not been published in a peer reviewed journal which is the only reason why no peer reviewed critiques are available What distinguishes a crank from a scientist is their handling of criticism all you are demonstrating by your inability to tolerate criticism is that you are a crank and that your defensive edits are vandalism BTW I see you now request that any counter evidence pre date your experiment what a shameless shifting of the goalposts By all means raise a RfC but you might not be happy with results