I m concerned about some of the above For example if you allow Jennifer Saunders and Bernie Taupin you must allow Mark Wallington because he was not only born at Sleaford but to my own knowledge also lived there significantly longer for at least 17 years than either Saunders known to have been born in Sleaford but lived in Cranwell only for the first few years of her life or Taupin known to have been born at Anwick which is not the same as Sleaford and had moved out of the area by the age of 11 You might argue that Saunders should be retained despite her short connection but Taupin certainly ought to go as his connection with the town is extremely tenuous In addition of the two references in Saunder s WP article one bfi screenonline is as reputable a source as say imdb com and as the other The Times requires a paid subscription to access the web site it is therefore inaccessible to ad hoc enquiries to use as a source I would be interested on all of your takes on this Not only because of its impact on Mark Wallington but others presently or previously included on the list for example Saunders Taupin Abi Titmuss Gary Crosby etc There seems to be a choice between operating on one set as at present and reinstating some who have been removed or another remove some who are present but for whom there are no acceptable and verifiable citations If there are some rules or exceptions let us apply them even handedly