Infoboxes are not obligatory in biographical or other articles here In this case those editors working on the article per Scott consist of Hoary Please consider his opinion Nihonjoe I see to my surprise that you tell him on your talkpage that removing the infobox is considered vandalism That passive form is considered presumably means you consider it vandalism I m sure you re aware being a crat that WP Vandalism doesn t Note especially the sentence If an editor treats situations which are not clearly vandalism as such then that editor may harm the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors It s hardly ever proper to call good faith actions of good users such as Hoary Vandalism nor to try to bully them like this I quote from your talkpage again You know I have no idea why you re so hung up on this Edit warring on this article isn t going to help your case as removing the infobox is considered vandalism Please stop this stupidity now Is there any reason why it would not make just as much sense no more and no less to express surprise that you are so hung up on it point out that edit warring isn t going to help you and ask you to stop your stupidity I m removing the infobox Please don t edit war