Parkwells Again as I just explained above I am not arguing for my own or any specific interpretation Again if the topic is a controversy then the reader should be made clear as to why that is The facts section serves this end very well and thank you again btw As an editor you are allowed to refer to historians in an overall or tertiary capacity mentioning that e g they all concur on this some concur on that or none concur on this or mention that It is perfectly acceptable to mention that few if any of the historians referred to offer any evidence for things like appearances whereabouts etc of the other candidates