Talk Jos Luis Rodr guez Zapatero Dispute Talk Jos Luis Rodr guez Zapatero Archive 1 Talk Jos Luis Rodr guez Zapatero Archive 2 Tags As this article began in UK English it must continue in said style Until this issues of style and issues of NPOV are cleaned up and the article is riddled with them the tags must stay Is Zapatancas really claiming the article is clean conforms to a neutral point of view contains no original research if he claims such things I dispute these claims and will not accept his removal of legitimate tags without cleaning up the article making it conform to NPOV and without his original research in it As for his false vandalism claims I suggest he reads the policy on what vandalism actually is As it is his false claims make him seem a POV warrior which as he is a committed PP supporter with a huge agenda around Zapatero may well be true Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a place to either promote political beliefs or launch attacks on other editors SqueakBox this is the Wikipedia and in the Wikipedia the Wikipedia s Manual of Style must be followed We have already explained to you why you must use American English in this article and most important of all why you can not mix spellings Please stop your childish attitude I must remind you that you added a NPOV tag in May and it had to be removed because nobody reported a single disputed passage Not true and we are now in November How can you use an argument that we don t need a POV tag because the article was alright 6 months ago Which we have explained that this article can not use En spelling because Zapatancas changed it Zapatancas and SquealingPigAttacksAgain You and anybody else did not report any disputed passage then You do not report any disputed passage now Do you believe you can deceive anybody The we who explained you why you can not use British English in this specific article is all the people who recently took part in the discussion about that issue I know you archived all that discussion because you felt it to be a personal defeat I treported the passage Viajero had a look and agreed with me Noen of the people who took part in the recent discussion agreed with you Now we have ity confitrtmed Spanish kids learn Brit English it is easy to see thatb you don t know how to write in American English You tried and it was a disaster I archived the discussion out of space issues as per standard procedure What is this talk of my defeat I thought the discussion ended with a clear consensus to use Brit English which also follows policy which are the rules we are duty bound to follow which states that we should use that English which was initially used which was clearly British English BTW the policy also prohibiyts using sockpuppets to vandalise the user page of other users I suggest you rwead the policies pages as I have done and then follow them as I do I do not know if you lie on purpose or if you have problems perceiving reality Viajero did not take part in the discussion as an easy search in the archived talk shows well perhaps he did but you delete his edit because you did not like it In any case you have proved again you are a liar for other reason Fortunately I am humbler than you and I can recognize my English is not perfect not like you who are all the time making mistakes and are unable to stop mixing spellings Because of that I use the spelling checker of Microsoft Word from time to time to ensure my edits do not include mistakes So if somebody really does not know how to use American English if must be the people of Microsoft The liar here is you Going to erase me are you Going to fuck my dead dog in the ass are you Zapatancas Why not try Oh you donm t have the guts If all you can do is Squeal don t do it too loudly Spelling won t solve your grammar problems notr thj efact that you are defying policy both in attacking me wioth your nasty sockpuppets and by changing the spelling of the article from en to us I just started the cleanup There is masses to do The article is POV and does not conform to wiki style I am coming tio the conclusion that it has been written in Spanish English which is not a native form and therefore has no place in any wikipedia articles Foreigners must always expect their grammar and use of language to be corrected by nativ