Yes they wish a linching 1 This is not the place to discusss phrase by phrase all the books contents Have you seen two different Sumerian scholars trannslating the same accepted transcripted text I ahve not seen scientific fraud word in any Arnaiz Villena publication 2 FEGEL is a publishing company Arnaiz Villena has nothing to do with it Read it carefully 3 The Easter Island language the Mohenjo Darro and Maya languages were never mentioned in any A A V in publications 4 Hoz wild assertions based on nothing just an impression not a serious critic have been removed from the article 5 Lakarra wild and subjective assertions on percentages by using about 50 words out of all the thousands published by A A V et al are not valid They have been removed 6 Pichler assertion in two lines of a bulletin has been renoved as unbased he has not read any AA V publication 6 Iru a Veleia Basque inscriptions were declared false by some authors but one month ago this was rebuted by other linguists My opinion is that this is an ongoing argument of Spanish media at present and is prenmature to mention in Wikipedia 7 You forget the initial question Latin or Iberian Guanche inscriptions This should be added We should put in the Wikipedia article a short summary We should also avoid defamation or statements which are not true This reference contains in English language methodology and ALL STUDIED LANGUAGES never mayan Hebrew Arab Dravidians or others that some of the editors want to put on a Wikipedia article should be put first for people see that no other languages were mentioned Now the language paragraph dedicated to this page is bigger that other more interesting topics and most important that are objective facts and not linguistic subjective opinions I have dede it shorted all information is there Yes they wish a linching 1 This is not the place to discusss phrase by phrase all the books contents Have you seen two different Sumerian scholars trannslating the same accepted transcripted text I ahve not seen scientific fraud word in any Arnaiz Villena publication 2 FEGEL is a publishing company Arnaiz Villena has nothing to do with it Read it carefully 3 The Easter Island language the Mohenjo Darro and Maya languages were never mentioned in any A A V in publications 4 Hoz wild assertions based on nothing just an impression not a serious critic have been removed from the article 5 Lakarra wild and subjective assertions on percentages by using about 50 words out of all the thousands published by A A V et al are not valid They have been removed 6 Pichler assertion in two lines of a bulletin has been renoved as unbased he has not read any AA V publication 6 Iru a Veleia Basque inscriptions were declared false by some authors but one month ago this was rebuted by other linguists My opinion is that this is an ongoing argument of Spanish media at present and is prenmature to mention in Wikipedia 7 You forget the initial question Latin or Iberian Guanche inscriptions This should be added We should put in the Wikipedia article a short summary We should also avoid defamation or statements which are not true This reference contains in English language methodology and ALL STUDIED LANGUAGES never mayan Hebrew Arab Dravidians or others that some of the editors want to put on a Wikipedia article should be put first for people see that no other languages were mentioned Now the language paragraph dedicated to this page is bigger that other more interesting topics and most important that are objective facts and not linguistic subjective opinions I have dede it shorted all information is there