Okay I listened to the sermon again Kennedy cites Behe s findings and statements and a little more than halfway through Kennedy points out that Behe never claims to be a Creationist Gosh Now why would he point that out if he were a supporter of ID See what is obviously going on here is that Kennedy and IDers like Behe are using the same evidence but are drawing different conclusions which aren t identical Kennedy sees the evidence as backing up his Creationist beliefs e g 6 literal days animals and humans made as is Kennedy may use the same evidence as Behe but that does not make him an IDer by any stretch of the imagination