Ref SS Ponzi Scheme Hi Padillah It is not my opinion that I am trying to impose here although it may appear to be so I am just highlighting the fact that it remains controversial whether it is or isn t a Ponzi Scheme even if a legal one so you can not state as a fact that it is not a Ponzi Scheme I saw the reference and the perpetrator itself can not be treated as a reliable source In fact claiming it is not a Ponzi Scheme seems to be an opinion in itself My point is that a claim should not be made either way and the edit in question just accomplishes that Thank you Virat