Thanks again for your suggestions and edits As I understand it the criteria see WP GA and process for selecting good articles are a bit more flexible than featured articles and any editor can carry out the review To address the previous peer review I went through and tagged 3 of the 4 articles tagged as registration warnings by checklinks with the subscription required template I also checked the redirects and they are all open although the national academies requires registration and include a link to PLoS via the DOI resolver I figured that was ok but I can replace the url with a direct link if necessary I ve tried to bracket some sections like bioinformatics that were largely based upon one or two review articles with citations at the beginning and end of paragraphs as suggested Again I m new here so if its necessary to increase the citation density it d be no undue burden to do so If you could point to a passage or two so that I know what you mean it d be a help I expanded the end of the biofuel section a bit to specifically mention the leafcutter ant fungus garden metagenome with links out to the larger system and its mutualism I hope I didn t overlook any I probably should have explicitly replied on the PR sorry if that was poor form