I am sorry if I cite too much of your text and maybe a bit out of context as a revenge P stop performing massive reverts of ColdWind s edits without justification that is edit warring Well I did this once and have shortly after requested outside opinions Help You for example so that this does not become an editwar Instead make small incremental edits which are much harder to track and revert I am a huge fan of the Preview Button and tell everyone to use it as much as possible use the edit summary field to describe and justify your edits I can not do so on mondays and wednesdays Sorry but I try to do it as often as possible The large revert had such a Monday Morning Oh My God I Have to go Edit summary right great wrongs Context I have also stated that I want to do it not using Wikipedia but by improving the article Wikipedia Style I will not Violate NPOV And its proponents claim describe is by no means a Weasel word because one knows who it s proponents are WP RS s o themselves has problems with 1 4 and maybe 3 And My plight is to avoid 5 And this is just a Guideline I am talking about WP SOURCES Articles should be based upon reliable third party published sources with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy Finally Also please reconsider creating a user account so everyone can easily see which edits are yours No I only call myself Probono here and will vanish into nothingness if this one is resolved 1 because maybe someone wants to follow my example and can then be Probono2 Nobody should know who did which edits unless they are outright Vandalistic and deserve a Banhammerlock Each Edit is to be seen not as a work of someone but should ask the question Does this make Wikipedia a better Encyclopedia I do not want a reputation especially not a good one I score 7231 Points on the WP WHT But that does not mean my contributions are better than anyone elses and I DO NOT WANT that one is not yelled but cited the benefits of a user account NOINDEX Probono1