What a silly line of argument I say specifically that that material is crap and shouldn t be in the article and you say that means you must secretly like it Sorry it s abundantly clear you re just trying to deflect attention from the obvious deficiency of your own material And yes it s required that a source actually be relevant to the topic to be included Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or for excessive listing of statistics Material should be given proper weight to all all relevant and related viewpoints ie irrelevant material should get none Etc