No no please don t shut yourself up Reasonable discourse with any editor no matter if they are an administrator or not is perfectly reasonable Let s take your post from 2 12 28 August 2009 for example I agree with Meowy this seems like an attempt to rid the articles from unfavorable content Why wouldn t wikipedia cover the harrasment of Azerbaijanis whose only mistake was voting for their neighbors song And this comes from a country that claims that it s the most tolerant country in the world So yes I think if there is information supported by verifiable and reliable sources it should be included That could have been worded far better to make your point stick If you had made the following changes instead it would have been far more effective a statement I agree with Meowy this seems like an attempt to rid the articles from unfavorable content Why wouldn t wikipedia cover the harrasment of Azerbaijanis whose only mistake was voting for their neighbors song And this comes from a country that claims that it s the most tolerant country in the world So yes I think if there is information supported by verifiable and reliable sources it should be included I hope that helps please do reply to this if you wish for me to explain any point further Thanks