What s wrong with you Why this perverted interpretation of what is happening here Why did you reverted this whole article just because you are frustantred and you weren t right I knew that I was right as I ve read what Kekaumenos says about Vlachs a long time ago I knew I was right just like I was right with Bejamin of Tudela I knew because I know what I m talking about unlinke you I knew he clearly mentions the Danube and the Sava and even mentions Trajan s war as a reason for Vlachs dissobeintment to the Romans in Kekaumenos case Greeks So I ve shown you that I was rigth but you choose to insult me for my my great Romanian propaganda because I sayd on the Danube instead of south of the Danube by the way I ll search for the exact transaltion as I doubt it is as you say And not only that yesterday you were ready to quote Kekaumenos when he says Vlachs came only from the Bessi but now when it was proven I was right you start all this shit about how Kekaumenos speaks BS because how can be possible this when refering to the second century AD Leave aside your mailgnant interpretation