My thanks to Ron for his recent correspondence and my apologies to anyone at Wikipedia whose policies I may have violated in terms of self promotion It was not my intention to promote myself or any other family members but to bring attention to facets of Richard Rose s life that the authors of this article intentionally chose to omit The timeline for example gives a wonderful overview with photos of Richard Rose s life I have been quite fortunate to receive supportive communication from those who have visited the Richard Rose Teachings site I put up to continue the work that I formerly did for many years under the auspices of the TAT Foundation that Richard created Circumstances change people change I also feel that I may have a unique perspective to offer having been both wife and student for almost 30 years But this is not about me and is neither here nor there in regards to the issue at hand I have chosen not to make any further edits on the article page The authors have done a fine job putting the article together and despite the subtle plugs which remain intact I believe most people as one party has already voiced will see beyond that and glean what they can from the gems that Richard Rose left behind It is truly a story worthy of Wikipedia s hosting Of course I m prejudiced Sincerely Cecy Rose