I think the problem here is we have differing definitions on what constitutes truly credible I m not entirely sure how bad information is being distributed other than the possibility of major sources assuming the good faith of others I think the weight of evidence that we have access to leans towards Brandon Teena given that the sources are reasonably credible and that it was not a legal name but a pseudonym which are by their nature somewhat hazy and undefinable What would constitute truly credible in your book