I might say that if it s Keynesian it s fringe and contradicted by reliable sources but that would be my opinion and since I am not a notable economist everyone else would be justified in considering such a claim laughable My reply to Lawrencekhoo and to which I d like to hear others replies since I am not willing to accept only Lawrencekhoo s judgment remains although Hazlitt may not be included in any history of economic thought textbook that I know of does the fact the Hazlitt wrote a textbook that has sold over a million copies count I would consider Paul Samuelson to be a noted economist despite being a Keynesian on that basis so I would hope the same principle would apply to Hazlitt a student of the Austrian School