January 2015 UTC In a search of the first twenty 20 pages of Google search results for EURO white supremacist limited to results dated prior to 12 27 2014 before the recent artificial controversy I only found ONE 1 result in which the organization EURO is referred to as being white supremacist I will not cite it in part to force anybody who still think there is a consensus to seek it out himself and thus find any other such cite I take this as being clear evidence that there is no consensus for the idea that EURO is white supremacist Quite the opposite Those who would take the dozens of pages of results dated on or after 12 28 2014 as amounting to being a consensus are obviously trying to play a trick on WP and its readers Some of those people have already shown up at WP trying to re edit the article so say that EURO is white supremacist These media references are clearly not grass roots they are purely Astroturf They are far more evidence of sloppy MSM mainstream media gullibility or even a conspiracy Clearly hundreds of separate organizations took their rhetorical cues from one source the way each musician in an orchestra takes cues from a single conductor So if anything the results after 12 28 2014 should be taken as evidence of a fraud Virtually every organization which referred to EURO as being white supremacist with the possible exception of organizations which independently justified that label have demonstrated their participation in and assistance of that fraud But some have advocated using the term white nationalist as a fallback position even claiming that this is a compromise Problem is a compromise with a fraud is still a fraud Study the WP article Black Nationism and you read There are different indigenous nationalist philosophies but the principles of all Black nationalist ideologies are unity and self determination that is separation or independence from European society I think any definition of white nationalism that does not contain equivalent wording is clearly evidence of bias a double standard which is unfortunately common in today s double standard world A look at WP White Nationalism reveals no such equivalent requirement This I suggest is bias which explains why some people still want to refer to EURO as being white nationalist They don t want to condition such a label on the requirements clearly present in the label black nationalist A look at the list of positions of EURO already included in this WP article clearly don t include any indications of separation or independence from other races Therefore EURO can not qualify as being white nationalist based on any even handed definition of white nationalist the corollary is that anybody advocating labelling EURO as being white nationalist must be advocating a biased stilted definition of white nationalist different than WP s definition of black nationalist Therefore within 48 hours giving anyone an opportunity to challenge this I plan to remove the reference to white nationalist from this article 22 09 10