The comment about a Dragonlance book being kept in an AfD due to common sense is an improper allegory to this situation The actual book has many things that make it notable that can be verified from reliable sources That is common sense but it is when you try to make observations about that book that are not present in the book is when you run afoul of the OR provisions Let us say there is a dragon in the book that s description is very similar to one found in the first book The author of the second book did not identify the dragon as the same one as in the first book by Hickman Wies but you make a claim that the dragon is the same dragon on the basis the descriptions are the same That is a synthesis because another contributor could also say they are just the same species of dragon while a third could say that new author is just plagiarizing the original book In application of this reasoning to the BSG DL2 situation what s to say that one of the robots is not a cheap knock off from China Maybe it was a project by a kid at MIT who wanted his own Sony robot but couldn t get because it was a prototype and they don t actually sell it yet That is why we can not make the claim unless there is proper sourcing to be had to validate the comment we are making