Neutrality This sounds to me more like an essay supporting the amendment than a neutral presentation of the topic Though you have a commendable number of references in explaining support for the amendment the opposition section seems to rely on unnamed opponents some claim some hold etc which isn t a great practice Also every paragraph in the opposition section seems to end with a response from proponents while the section of arguments in favor doesn t have that practice Statements like this argument confuses or these sources do not provide explanation are the opinion of the author and aren t presented neutrally Instead attribute those arguments to a particular source Otherwise the article is non neutral and represents original research Hope this helps