So basically what we have here is Two or more editors Bubba73 and Quale who have had a consensus on the article since 12 Dec 2010 An IP address editor 98 113 152 93 who keeps introducing material against consensus Another editor 212 68 15 66 who came by saw the brouhaha and made another revert A fourth editor Jsharpminor who came by saw the brouhaha and templated three people for excessive reversion and 3RR An article that now stands correct by consensus It seems that the obvious thing then is to leave the article the way it is However do take note that engaging someone in an edit war even if consensus supports you isn t the right way to handle it For clarity the page was reverted six times between 5 32 11 Apr and 8 41 12 Apr You might want to see the pages on reverting and edit warring for suggestions including a request for protection and the edit war noticeboard I m posting a report of this to the noticeboard I m not sure what they ll decide to do with him Cheers