I think that s fine Are you going to make the changes or should I Regarding judicial review and the power to strike down legislation I don t agree that those powers are not in the Constitution Certainly they are not specifically stated but there are some implied powers in the text in the sense that the text imposes duties and requirements on bodies which are only possible through the excercise of a power not explicitly granted Thus for example Article I nowhere states that Congress can run a decennial census but in order to meet the requirements of Art I 2 Cl 3 Congress must hold a census Likewise the court is granted certain duties in Article III and even if one assumes that judicial review is not inherently part of the judicial power those powers and duties granted can not be excercised absent the power to strike down laws I should stress that I am not surrendering to The Living Constitution there is a vast difference in my view between obviously and necessarily implied powers and the atextual penumbras of Justice Douglas Griswold Roe etc 7 July 2005 20 33 UTC