Several editors have raised concerns that the article erroneously characterizes the park as being used mainly by the homeless Others disagree In my examination of the sources I have not found one that supports the viewpoint given in the article Numerous sources discuss the homeless problem which I understand to mean the presence of homeless people but every single source I have examined describes a variety of people using the park The comments of truly uninvolved editors who did not engage in extensive argument about the issue on this page before the RfC was filed would be appreciated