The content you re added to the page is 1 the claim that this is one of the oldest law journals in the US Originally it was stated fourth oldest then fifth oldest The oldest or even second oldest is notable but at some point this becomes trivial 2 Biographical information about William Willey consistently referred to as Professor Willey something w don t even do in biographies If Willey is notable this information belongs in his biography not in this article which is about the journal Whose son Willey was or was not is absolutely trivial here even though it might not be trivial in Willey s bio I will remove this info and would appreciate if you would stop inserting it 3 The deletion of Ketchum was a mistake no clue where that came from