Well actually capitalist can apply to a very very broad range of economic systems used by an equally wide variety of different historical societies That s because capitalism involves some degree of private investment in the market from simple mercantilism through to full out plutocratic hegemony and everything in between If such an article were to exist there would need to be a clearly defined scope which is next to impossible to achieve You would have some obvious additions to the list Augusto Pinochet and other Operation Condor regimes Park Chung hee etc But where is the line drawn Do we include the likes of Saddam Hussein Hafez al Assad or Benito Mussolini who did allow a few private enterprises to exist but within very strict parameters i e private in name only Does the system of governance necessarily have to be dictatorial Do we exclude any government that espouses some form of socialism Communism was a very specific political and economic movement that took hold in the 20th century and has come to be associated with oppression mass killings and the complete absence of private enterprise It is very easy to delineate communist regimes they were self identified as such and conformed to the centrally planned economic model established by the Soviet Union It is therefore much easier to define the scope of this article Joseph Stalin Mao Zedong Pol Pot Kim Il sung Vladimir Lenin Mengistu Haile Mariam Le Duan Siad Barre probably Ho Chi Minh and Josip Broz Tito as well etc