Sock puppets I m sure that is a sock puppet Jonah has been using multiple sock puppets ever since he started editing I blocked a handful of them previously I suppose that we should block too Due to his many disruptions and personal attacks some sort of action regarding the user now known as would be appropriate Perhaps an RfC What do you think PS yes I think you acted properly to refactor the personal attack against you You might want talk to Sojambi I think he s going to file one At least that seemed to be the implication On the Biff Rose talk page I extended an invitation to meet Jonah in Union Square New York City for lunch my treat Apparently we both live in the 5 Boroughs Perhaps we can work this out in a civil manner So far he has not responded positively and my name remains on his official enemies list So we will see I ll give it another couple days RFC page for BD Got your message I ve removed the comments it wiki Hallo many thanks for you message We aleady linked the interview in our Village pump a couple of days ago Thanks for your nice words Ciao it Utente Civvi pl wiki A quick hello Hi Paul Thanks for the info on the interview I think it s the best one I ve watched so far I wanted to let you know I ve moved it but we all have our hands full right now the 100 K articles Press Release brought an enormous popularity increase Happy editing and see you at Wikimania 2006 hopefully Best BD777 IP address Takes ownership of it here Also I forgot to mention that I agree with your position on E those comments are most appropriate for the talk page see threaded discussion in the comments section Old Sandbox I keep up with your old sandbox page I would note merely that my attempt to fix BD777s behavior is quite clearly detailed on the RFC page with links to diffs of what both I and he said I d also note that the pages you accuse me of having as pet pages are pages that I had not edited untill after BD777 began editing on them While some of the signatories of the RFC are liberal POV warriors you re going to have a hard time convincing me that I am What your comment on my talk page demonstrates is that you are not doing the requiste research to fully understand the issue for instance you can t figure out why BD777 got vanadalism warnings but I can and I did in about 10 seconds he got them for being a vandal Everyone who is going to look at BD777 from an ArbCom perspective is going to look at his first edit They re going to understand why he got vandalism warnings Unlike you people are willing to click the previous edit and next edit They are willing to scroll down into the text under the diff to figure out context Why you are not I have no idea Okay you ve proved your point and mine Yes that is clearly vandalism but no I shouldn t have had to dig for it or ask you for it Has he made any edits since that are clearly vandalism or were the warnings sufficient He has not done anything since that rises in my eyes to the level that I would consider banning him indefinitely no You write that you don t see how this is a rebuke as you can see by the comment above I wrote please read WP AGF BD777 responds that he s not going to follow WP AGF I ask him what we can do to fix the article he has nothing to say about that Anyone who isn t trying to d