The above denials are POV and ironically based on the very argument that was used against the sources I cited An editor s POV does not should not factor in to this discussion and so far that is all that has been provided in the arguments against the term s application and ubiquity The sources I cited pass the acid test for WP RS academic and institutional research and confirm use of the term non Muslim no go zones or areas according to WP PAG Show me the RS that support your position and or contradict the sources I cited because POV is irrelevant and unacceptable in WP articles