Actually when the article is read in context he is not 100 wrong but that is neither here nor there The fact is I am not resisting this information being put in the article at all I am simply stating that it is not that big a deal everyone had a pre 911 mindset before 911 and the few who didn t like Clarke Scheuer were seen as paranoid The only reason Johnson s pre 911 views have been made an issue is to make a nonsensical smear against him I am not pushing you around I am trying to keep the article useful and relevant and free of idiotic statements and right wing propaganda As far as his expertise goes please point to a single source actually questioning his expertise Something other than innuendo based on something he wrote before 911 There is no need for personal attacks I am not a bully If you are not trying to smear Johnson why is it you insist on implying that he is a liar by putting qualifiers in every statement when those statements are not contested by anyone on earth