The blog link was in the Wikipedia External links section thus the verifiability policy is not particularly relevant From the external links policy Sites with other meaningful relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article such as textbooks or reviews Also Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem From what I ve read the Huaorani were one of the most violent people groups on earth Life expectancy below 30 due to inter clan revenge killings and killings of anyone entering their territory Am I wrong That to me is violent Remember that that is the lead of the article and thus everything must be summarized soon I m going to add a paragraph explicitly sourced that talks about their history To me proselytise has a negative connotation I don t really see the problem with hope to present Christianity it s not like the Huaorani were being force fed the stuff the foreigners had a specific mission and goal but we re not talking about Spanish invaders killing the Indians if they don t convert It s bad formatting to describe a reference in the references section it is never done in FAs for example I eliminated the text for a reason I thought the comment was aimed at me and noting it I deleted the text Once texts are included that are anti missionary and are cited in the article text it will be obvious which sources are anti missionary Thy Will Be Done Fishers of Men or Founders of Empire etc and which aren t I was hoping to continue with the narrative but this Friday probably I ll start working on an Aftermath section including a discussion of what different anthropologists think about all this