Weddell and the Uranie The following sentence was re added to the article Weddell also linked the ceremony to Jewett s claim to the wreck of the Uranie and that it was was calculated to make an impression on the masters of ships in the area It is sourced with For starters given the wording it makes me wonder if Jewett ever laid claim on the wreck of the Uranie It is my understanding that he did not but current text makes me doubt Secondly if Jewett in fact didn t claim the wreckage what is the point of reporting Weddell s conjectures about Jewett s intentions Also if those hypothesis are reported by a secondary source Cawkell does it mean that the secondary source avails them I guess it depends on how the secondary source reports them context But it does seems a bit weird if those 19th century suppositions are demonstrably wrong What I m trying to say is that I don t see the point for inclusion unless the idea is to discredit the ceremony as Weddell did