In my opinion the article still contains strong POV and still reads like a commercial presentation Thanks for your effort but we need to do more 1 Read the section on the economic doldrums of Xerox between 1980 and 2002 it s practically missing 2 The section on the poor accounting practices a half decade ago reads like it s intended to excuse not explain with NPOV 3 The overall article reads like a brochure intended to court investment and instill confidence that Xerox has never done wrong and always grown