Hello Adraen By new title do you mean a new section Or a completely new article We can certainly add more material on former glaciation of the Himalaya Right now the article is not very detailed If we add a lot of detail about former glaciation then the article would become unbalanced We can possibly create a new article out of the new material It is important that new material be supported by multiple reliable sources especially if a new article is created Relying on a single source has a very real risk of violating the Neutral point of view rule we need to make sure that the material about paleoglaciation reflects scientific consensus and gives due weight to minority views and reports on controversy Concretely I summarized the previous material only removing the long list of ancient glaciers and the excessive citations to Matthias Kuhle I removed the long list because the out of context list was not helpful to our readers See the guideline about indiscriminate information I removed the excessive citations to Kuhle because Wikipedia is not a collection of links and the addition of 17 references by seemed like a conflict of interest Please feel free to expand on the current article understanding the guidelines that I used to remove and summarize the old material I would suggest not simply reverting but adding material that offers insight to our readers