I think it s arguable that the opinions of a person said by some of the editors to be using a sock should be disregarded If Gabrielsimon has been determined to be a sock puppet by our Sock smeller Poursuivaunt David Gerard or by consensus of administrators on WP ANI then I ll discount his vote When I m saying I think it s plausible that you re somebody s sock and go on to say if that is the case I ve counted your vote already it s to illustrate that I m trying to level the playing field I know these votes attract socks so I use a uniform criterion 100 votes and one month that s AND not OR and some other nonsense filters If you pass it you re in I discount your vote because as it is plausible that you re a sock you would probably have voted already We have thousands of editors If an article really needs to be deleted some of those thousands of editors will come forward and ask for it to be deleted There s no need for me to take notice of votes from very recent newcomers Now as to the content of the article for the most part I m content to let the two dozen or so other people involved in the discussion to deal with that If you can t agree among yourselves that something needs to be done to the article then I call keep by default