No one is discussing censorship or removal of this page s contents at all The information on this page is valuable to discussions of the NT other Christian texts analysis in the contexts of theology historicity However what you ll find in the other articles you reference that you do not find here are meticulous reliance on secondary sources for evidence supporting the claims of persecution Thus this article remains an analysis of Christian texts primary sources and not an analysis of historical events Secondary sources were previously requested and after five months of stagnation I don t think it s unreasonable to suggest that they are not coming anytime soon Therefore in the interest of preserving both the article s contents and Wiki s citation policies some change must take place The persecution of Christians article which links here makes a point of saying Reliable evidence of events accompanying the schism between the Pharisees and the Nazarenes is not available As such I think framing the article in the context of theological depictions is neither prejudiced nor misleading One last thing I want to reiterate that if this article was comprised of factual accounts derived from secondary sources there would be no cause for complaint The problem is that this controversial article has stagnated in an unacceptable state and until someone does the necessary research to provide secondary sources it must be at the very least framed properly as a discussion of theology historicity so as not to be misunderstood I look forward to the time when some ambitious individual actually does produce a well researched appropriately sourced article about the history this article seeks to discuss however this is not it