I can t see how any of these would be meaningful here I object to all of them The First Reference 1 Actually it s been shown that people fear what they aren t familiar with PCs are great Nuclear is feared in most places I can t see how t would be useful anyway 2 Pre TMI that was true Post TMI is a different culture 3 Odd I used nuclear fuel software named PANACEA Seriously safety isn t simple or easy The electricity is the same and capacity factors are now above 90 so it is reliable 4 The nuclear industry has an information network whereby incidents at any plant are broadcast to every other plant with the intent that the same problem not occur twice 5 Each American has the option to vote for strongly anti nuclear candidates 6 True but choice based is available now Second Reference We already say likely would be less Third Reference The sarcophageus only covers the ruined Unit 4 The other units remain without containment buildings Containment never sealed off at TMI Fourth Reference This reflects the current state of training and operations Tech specs carry the force of federal law And the Station Shift Supervisor can throw anyone off site 3 July 2005 18 58 UTC