Syntax I ve been experimenting with how an entry would be best formatted It will take a little more work but considering these two examples what do you think about following these models Sorry if this is a repeat of an earlier discussion I hadn t seen it and wanted to provide a reference for future editors Example Continent Section class wikitable sortable style width 100 Country or Greater Geographical Area State Province or Other Geographical Area Grand Lodge Name Founded Lodges Members External Organizations Mexico Coahuila Gran Logia Benito Juarez del Estado de Coahuila Grand Lodge of the State of Coahuila Benito Juarez GL Coahuila website accessed 2 March 2014 1890 24 284 CGLREU France Grand Orient de France Grand Orient of France GOdF or GOF GOdF website Accessed 19 January 2014 1728 1773 1 150 52 000 AMIL IMF SIMPA Notes Country and State In most sections we would I would add a state province column which would remain empty if a jurisdiction served the entire nation Nation wide grand lodges would be listed ahead of state grand jurisdictions even if sovereign Name The actual name and in non English nations usually the non English name would be first followed by an English translation and then by an abbreviation if it is commonly used My thinking is that since this is the English version of Wikipedia a translation is necessary but the original jurisdictional name should lead for purposes of accurate identification Further we may generally dismiss prefixes and modifiers such as A F A M Most Worshipful etc where they are not needed to help clarify an identity against a rival yet should include terms like Legal as in the case of Portugal Regular and or National when used as part of the name where it helps designate from another jurisdiction etc Links to that jurisdiction s website should go in this field after the name Wikipedia links would be used here as available either linking the original language name to its non English language Wikipedia site or the translated name Names are listed alphabetically by their actual name not the translation Date Correct date formats would be the year of founding normally unless there were some controversy that requires the specific day In addition if a grand jurisdiction was re founded a second date separated by slash would be allowed References Where a reference supports multiple data points for that entry it would be placed after the last applicable data point Web access syntax in a reference should be noted accessed 2 March 2014 or similar External Organizations These should be listed with Wikipedia links to the definition of that external group below with multiple entries separated by commas We should move all but acronyms to the list below to allow this column to be more narrow