As I pointed out when I made the correction some of the sources for example are broken moreover other sources are simply from obscure or questionable websites igdigital urgente24 opisantacruz NOT from reliable sources which I ve been trying to find on this subject but seem scarce for this afirmations The sources are also in spanish without any clarification for example I eliminated a sentence that said he has not been charged at least in part allegedly because and his personal connection to the judge in the case while the article explicitly says A su vez Brito no es amigo de Ariel Lijo Brito is not a friend of Ariel Lijo the judge in question so yes it s poorly sourced and libelous which is why I eliminated those parts and not others You should take into account that since this refers to a living person special care about these type of contentious material without proper sourcing should be taken