Copied from user page genocide re your note on my page I am not arguing against your statements but you re changing sourced and cited text to statements There was for example a quote on there that had a citation needed You removed it stating merely that the wording was correct That s not good enough for an encyclopedia They were calling for a citation that would actually support your arguments removing it so that people like myself who go through looking for citation needed notes to cite won t know that the fact needs to be supported That means in half a year when you re on vacation for a month someone might come across it and say Huh That s not cited Out it goes While it might feel like a blog or regular website the point of Wikipedia is to provide knowledge When you make changes such as referring to the schools as fomenting genocide without citing it you re not helping the people who will come here looking for information If you have books scholarly references newspapers and such to support your view we d LOVE it to be added to the article My issue has nothing to do with whether its genocide or not but with uncited things that could be opinions especially because of their emotional load being added Use scholarly language keep emotion out of it and document your work with citations and the info that you no doubt have and no one will revert your work