Recent edits by Brian Dell I do not understand the basis for the following recent edits perhaps you can explain them without the personalization and accusations of bad faith Please interlineate your responses edit summary you are cherry picking here Doc The majority of the material is Dept of Defense files That should be acknowledged here if you are going to say what the material was about The material you deleted as been in the lead for some time I didn t add it I merely moved it Now the lead doesn t say that Snowden revealed surveillance programs which is obviously what he s best known for If you want something in there about the DoD then we can probably work something in there But deleting the whole sentence doesn t seem productive edit summary doing your best to try and whitewash the chronology via selective omission I see This is the true chronology Doc Some of your additions have nothing to do with anything I did and others re added material that isn t sufficiently noteworthy of the lead Snowden s specific contractor roles and the precising timing of the State Department s revocation of his passport are simply not essential facts for a 4 paragraph biography of the man edit summary I thot you thot the lede was too long DrF If you can find the length to tack on a one sided political statement the space could be found to reported undisputed facts like Snowden s meeting with Russians in HK You removed reliably sourced content explaining that three courts have ruled on the legality of the telephone metadata program not two As written the lead is misleading because Judge Pauley s decision was reversed by the Second Circuit