It s not valid to say this photo is equivalent to the illustrations in the other sex related articles those are line drawings and established artistic images read oil paintings one might find in a museum or gallery for ex not photographs This photo adds no value but titillation to the article the mind boggles at the idea that a reader can t imagine for themselves the juxtaposition of a tongue and an anus One could possibly argue for the validity of inclusion of an illustration from farther back thus showing a likely position or positions from which analingus might be achieved but again line drawings suffice Question why are there no naked pictures much less images of explicit sexual activity at Jenna Jameson for one example You could certainly make a better case for hardcore images being necessary to the understanding of that subject than the case for this picture being necessary to the understanding of this one That is a generic tongue and a generic anus and no useful information is presented with the image