In controversies sections which are mostly grubbed up by stupid POV fishing expeditions to find authoritative crap or flamorous appraisels thrown on or at a figure one dislikes on wikipedia one should distinguish peer review see the Criticism section for Karl Popper to grasp the point from public controversies quite distinctly esp in the I P area where anxiety fits and politicized hysteria are commonplaces even in the commentariat That is what mist be sharply distinguished here