Royal Statistical Society unreliable source User Modernist had deleted the link to an article from Royal Statistical Society magazine calling it an unreliable source So what is reliable Preceding unsigned comment added by Its also spam What is spam Any scholarly article which dissagrees with your opinion Preceding unsigned comment added by Actually your website and blog is spam That is not my website but belongs to Royal Statistical Society In addition it is not a blog but a magazine Preceding unsigned comment added by They have too many advertisements and pleas for comments blog like and ads for subscribers but most importantly your article is garbage its about chimps elephants and other animals and kids who paint like the abstract expressionists oh wow Some people 67 even think that the major abstract expressionists are better than the chimps and the elephants WOW The only valid objection to linking a blog is that anyone can post anything he likes in his blog And this is an edited magazine The objection that articles allow comments and that this somehow makes it a blog can not be taken seriously Regarding ads almost all popular websites have them And those sites already linked in the Wikipedia article do have ads I picked two at random Ref 17 has Google ads Ref 19 advertises exhibition which asks 10 for admission The article that I linked is discussed widely in the media see for example and therefore meets Wikipedia criteria for importance So far you did not offer any logical objections to its conclusions Preceding unsigned comment added by There is a lot of repetition in this article i e mentioning several times that some think Abstract Expressionism was nihilistic To say that deKooning s Women paintings were grotesque is subjective and judgmental and not consistent with the artist s vision of that body of work This may have been the opinion of some critics however as it is written in this article the description is not attributed to a specific critic making it sound like a general comment to be taken as fact Preceding unsigned comment added by Question As an example in 1958 Mark Tobey became the first American painter since Whistler 1895 to win top prize at the Venice Biennale New York s two leading art magazines were not interested Arts mentioned the historic event only in a news column and ARTnews Managing editor Thomas B Hess ignored it completely The New York Times and Life printed feature articles 9 Footnote 9 is not specified with a page number and in my opinion is incorrect I read the whole catalogue and could not find the quotation by Seitz Who made this common or where is the quotation orginally from ASH257 Preceding unsigned comment added by