Roger Dixon No mention of Roger Dixon s testimony Roger Dixon was the third defence witness after Oscar Pistorius testified himself in the trial and he continued testifying on the 16th and 17th of April before the adjournment until the 5th may Sure Gerrie Nel ripped him apart because he testified in areas outside his field of expertise and was called as expert witness but I think that he ought to still be mentioned in the progress of trial section Hi IP I m going to be editing here tomorrow unless some else cares to before me which indeed I encourage I m only seeking to redress what I consider is an imbalance I shan t be referencing Roger Dixon s testimony though I certainly think his testimony should be included in any rewrite after the judgment is in On the whole contributors here haven t concentrated on the minutiae of witness testimony but of course you re welcome to make a contribution Someone might well like to add an edit about his Facebook remark in the Social Media section