I see that amd are new to Wikipedia and this article is the first one you have both edited Welcome to you both and I hope you both go on to make many more contributions I support Malick s reversion so we do not have community consensus for deletion as yet The question here is whether there are reliable sources If there are unreliable sources as well then that doesn t really have a bearing unless of course the reliable sources have based their information only on the unreliable ones in which case they re perhaps not so reliable I m not going to repeat Malick s revert yet as I respect the views of our two new editors Could one of who please explain your reasoning for regarding the Spencer reference as unreliable in a little more detail I don t think I understand your argument about this source from what you ve written so far