Protected There is a dispute whether Henry Keogh should be mentioned on this page Please discuss and present arguments for or against inclusion instead of edit warring Several interesting facts have been removed repeatedly I believe that it is of interest that the murderer himself the Chief Justice hearing an appeal the original State Prosecutor and a journalist from a government TV station are all alumni of the same school The main arguments against inclusion seem to be that 1 it will somehow discomfit young people viewing the page 2 including Keogh s name implies that there are other murderers or potential murderers at the school a patently illogical assertion According to wjs13 Nothing is interesting when it is upsetting people who go to the school and look up their school to see names of murderers This seems a petty argument to me given that there is a lot of potentially disconcerting material on wiki I see wiki as an encyclopedia a collection of facts presented from an npov not some abridged bowdlerised collection of pap for children of a nervous disposition I have tried to present the facts from an npov I did not include rumours for example that Keogh is referred to by current and former students and others as The St Ignatius Strangler because a they can not be substantiated unless photographs of graffiti count as citations and b he did not actually strangle his unfortunate victim I have also not included the verifiable fact that Keogh was allowed leave from prison to attend the funeral of his mother at St Ignatius College This is probably a step too far for the St Ignatius school page itself but I contend it should be put on the Henry Keogh page To move some discussion from my personal talk page We do not have to include every verifiable fact about a subject in the article Do multiple reliable sources about the school not about Keogh include that he went to school there If not mentioning him here might violate WP UNDUE If no sources have mentioned that all these people went to the same school writing this here would be a violation of the no original research policy Are there sources about the school that focus on the issue I did some researching in Yearbooks and his name never appeared once Unlike that anonymous user here who claims that he was in a yearbook Year Books 1968 72 don t exist It does it for five years 1970 1975 1975 1980 etc Even if that yearbook exists if the only source for Henry Keogh attended Saint Ignatius College is an old school yearbook from before the murder case mentioning him here will be considered original research Are there other sources I respectfully disagree with the original research label and agree that the yearbook is a sufficient citation The yearbook would be a primary source not original research A yearbook as a primary source does not require a secondary source because no interpretation of the yearbook is being done just simple reportage of the fact that was presented in it Please see WP PSTS It is not original research I have seen the year books with the class photographs My uncle was in the same class as Henry Keogh That is a primary source Are there any reliable secondary sources that mention this Or in other words it may be true but has anybody cared about this information so far See also our original research policy where original research has a precisely defined meaning Include Although a press release for a school would generally not include a list of criminal attendees an encyclopedia article should under the subhead Notorious just as this article has subheads for In sport and so on Notorious graduates are just as newsworthy and encyclopedia worthy as glamorous or popular grads Asking does anybody care isn t a good test people can not care about information that has been suppressed As a tertiary source we do not typically include information that no secondary source h