If this isn t a controversial topic then why are we having an edit war over it If it isn t a controversial topic then why does discussion of it always get heated If it isn t a controversial topic then why did it result in a multi million dollar lawsuit that caused a great divide within the Course community I am the first to admit that the article is currently far from being the best on Wikipedia and far from being its full potential That s because it is a stub You can continue to accuse it of being an attempt to advance Wapnick s perspective all you want That isn t the case If you think that the article is sloppy why not do what you can to improve it Your recent edits only confused the matter What you recently added suggested that both the literalists and the symbolics believe that Jesus is the literal source of the Course That is not accurate I am going to talk to the other editor of this page to see if he can block you from editing this page any further This page certainly needs work but it does not need continued vandalism And I don t need these continued bizarre accusations