Rename I think this should be renamed to Emo subculture Preceding unsigned comment added by Please put your comments under a new heading or the approrpiate heading below the table of contents Please sign your posts with four tildes and finally please note that this has been considered and resolved for the time being There is no basis for such a name see WP RS WP OR and WP SYN and no consensus see WP CONS to make such a change See the requested move discussion above Cheeser Please note the matter has been left unresolved No consensus exists either way Hence resolved for the time being I even explicitly stated that there was no consensus What more do you want from me I m set back a bit by your ungraceful attitude and the way you seem to hound me at every turn in the debate above and even now after it s been resolved The debate is over You have no support from reliable sources or consensus That means that it is resolved for now and if that bothers you I suggest you try to make peace with Wikipolicy and then maybe your behavior won t be so antagonistic If you want to badger me prod me or attempt to draw me into another debate about this issue I m just going to ignore it from now on Oh Cheeser calm down Not everyone who disagrees with you is hounding you Look at your past conversations with Switchar and EMC Do you see how you have a habit of taking things too hard You keep wikilawyering everyone Follow the spirit not the letter of the rules I d suggest you not threaten me an RfC is not a cocked gun don t point it at me like it is You think I m incivil I have a habit of sticking to policy when others give up or don t care enough to bother Citing policy on a frequent basis is NOT wikilawyering since wikilawyering presumes that I am obfuscating issues with legal jargon and technicalities of policy in order to advance inappropriate changes Are you accusing me of that in addition to threatening me In case you didn t notice I ve contributed constructively here for months despite my stick to policy attitude ZayZayEM has on at least three occasions butted in to conversations unnecessarily to hound me about this other another contentious matter And in fact he only started editing this article when he saw my post about EMC on the Administrator s Noticeboard and despite consensus in my favor there came to this page to pick up EMC s argument on his own Unnecessarily butting into conversations especially like he has done constitutes hounding as far as I m concerned Did you read the second point about abiding by the letter of the policy or guideline while ignoring the spirit of them by the way I have not heard anyone use the word obfuscating Except for lawyers maybe Your childish way of holding grudges seems to me to be incivil yes He is not butting into conversations unnecessarily he has the right as a wikipedian to express his opinion wherever to influence consensus His above comment was polite and you immediately took offense at it Don t let past arguments get in the way of assuming good faith Yeah everybody calm down So ZayZayEM felt it rather important to mention to the newcomer that the matter had not been resolved Of course you aknowledge albeit not all that clearly strongly as his comment did also note the different usage of resolved Cheeser the BRD process has come to a halt ZayZayEM there is consensus Just because ZayZayEM and quite a few others would have liked things to go different and we want to make it clear that we are on standby regarding this issue does not mean we are after you we just remain unconvinced because we were presented with policies and not positive and convincing arguments for the way the article stands Neither are we n