My interpretation is that agreement to leave these articles merged hinges upon Polaron s criteria which include that the place and the HD be substantially the same In this case Doncram has repeatedly asked for provision of some specific reference to support that He has finally given in and agreed to include the assertion without this reference which Polaron has stated would be added later in order to come to some conclusion and move on Replacing substantially the same to is the site of returns this article to a category of articles not included in Polaron s criteria for merging Doncram is not agreeing that any place that is the site of a HD should be merged On the one hand I ll admit that it took me a while to see this disticntion on the other hand Doncram as he always does is struggling to establish and maintain some systematic mutually acceptable way to proceed forward and establish a framework for NRHP development In the absence of the reference and some positive assertion of sameness the wording becomes the only expression of why this article differs from some other article where the HD is just some small part of a place as opposed to substantially the same