KARE TV See also Thank you for checking in with this page s issues I wanted to try to connect with someone as the same user seems bent on spinning or just plain deleting neutral cited content in favor of non cited or non NPOV analysis kind of getting sick of adjusting it and an admin has already blocked him but it still continues wondering if you might have time to check it out when you get a chance Thanks You are welcome and thank you for your note I will look into this further In re my post on I received an email which has since been deleted about this Robinsegg please provide that explanation here on wiki Thank you I am replying to your post on my talk page Regarding KARE edits the above editor has been warring with the ratings information He has used selected and questionably accurate references to prove his personal POV that KARE has struggled He uses household ratings numbers which are only considered as bragging rights in the industry Clearly this information seeks to support the competition His references bounce back and forth from demographic numbers those important in the industry to household ratings from different ratings periods giving a misleading picture He has deleted my offer of compromise to compare the February 2008 HH numbers with those of the February 2008 demographic numbers ommitting other contested material He also continues to downplay the significance of KARE s NPPA awards which are highly competitive and prized in the industry He recently edited honored with was the recipient of and recently deleted a judge s quote referenced from the NPPA website Even with the use of references the editor is spinning the information to downplay KARE while cleverly supporting the competition This shows a strong COI as well as NPOV issues I have sought help through the editor s assistance page as well as directly seeking the help of another moderator Robinsegg Preceding unsigned comment added by Thank you for getting back to me on this It s becoming apparent that the issues are not quite what they seemed to be at first I re listed the dispute on the third opinion project page