Exaggeration of CBT effectiveness In the lead sentence of the CBT subsection in the CFS treatment article it states that CBT results in improvements in about 70 of patients The reference given is PMID 16443043 which in the full text seems to cite PMID 11179154 However the next paragraph in the article describes the recent Cochrane review which showed the statistic to be more like 40 with the long term effect in doubt So I d like to know why one single study with a much higher success rate than systematic reviews is given preference in the lead sentence as a matter of fact statement Just imagine the editing furor that would occur if this was done in the subsection on essential fatty acids