I see discussion in the Acupuncture article about 3 or 4 scientists characterizing Acupuncture as a pseudoscience however I also see discussion about it being endorsed by organizations such as WHO What I am looking for is something like the authors of Phrenology have done and outright statement Phrenology is a pseudoscience No one is arguing that it isn t Phrenology is clearly generally considered to be a pseudoscience I am not see this de facto statement on Acupuncture but rather statements such as so and so has characterized acupuncture as pseudoscience If it is just a characterization then it belongs on List of topics characterized as pseudoscience but not on a de facto list of pseudosciences