It slays me that your faction has shown such utter contempt for the editors who ve contributed to this article and that you should put scare quotes around the words Dean expert considering that the venerable old master of the subject who wants to take the reins as you say is all of sixteen or seventeen years old Let s not forget that this whole affair started when DAP388 suddenly with no warning or discussion on the talk page unilaterally nuked the whole article and replaced it with his poorly edited substitute replete with errors of fact and tortuous phrasing He then reacted with shock and dismay when I reverted it and reverted my reversion completely oblivious to the concerns of other editors and apparently unconscious that he was doing the very thing I did to the work of one poorly prepared editor to the work of dozens I can hardly think of a more presumptuous or immature approach to getting what you want Given the aggressive efforts of DAP388 and his supporters to destroy a long standing article that has evolved over many years and whatever its faults is superior to the sophomoric critics adored replacement proffered it s hard not to conclude that this dubious enterprise is ego driven