Task: In this task, you will be presented with a premise and a hypothesis sentence. Determine whether the hypothesis sentence entails (implies), contradicts (opposes), or is neutral with respect to the given premise. Please answer with "Contradiction", "Neutral", or "Entailment".
Categories: Textual Entailment
Domains: Dialogue
Reasoning: Textual Entailment; Commonsense Reasoning; Causal Reasoning

Positive examples:
input: Premise: Ockleton, Morpurgo, Cornelius, Dysart and half a dozen others too drunk to mention. But there was so much coming and going that any one of us could have slipped out, pushed Everett through the window and slipped back again without being noticed. Damn it all we didn't even notice Everett was missing until a porter tripped over him in the quad so anything's theoretically possible. <sep> Hypothesis: Everett was missing
output: Entailment
explanation: This is a good example. Everett was missing. So, the hypothesis sentence entails the given premise.; input: Premise: I should dearly have liked to know whether they were Europeans or Americans, but I couldn't hear the accents. They appeared to be arguing. I hoped the white men weren't telling him to eliminate all witnesses because I don't believe it would have needed much persuasion. <sep> Hypothesis: eliminating all witnesses would have needed much persuasion
output: Contradiction
explanation: The speaker doesn't believe eliminating all witnesses would have needed much persuasion. In this example hypothesis sentence contradicts the given premise.; input: Premise: B: All right, well. A: Um, short term, I don't think anything's going to be done about it or probably should be done about it. B: Right.  Uh, are you saying you don't think anything should be done in the short term? <sep> Hypothesis: anything should be done in the short term
output: Neutral
explanation: In this example we don't know anything should be done in the short term or not. So, hypothesis sentence is neutral with respect to a given premise.

Negative examples:
input: Premise: B: If, uh, you've some kid uh, who's from a broken family, the schools are supposed to fill that void. It's gotten way beyond uh, you know, teaching classes and maybe providing extracurricular sports activities or something like, oh, were kind of traditionally the school's roles. A: Yeah.  Yeah, it's interesting because, uh, we're just having conversation on this, uh, with a couple of people yesterday. And I was expressing my frustrations that, uh, so many problems, I work in a high school, are that kids don't have a degree of self-discipline which may be reflected in society at large. Uh, and you can't expect in a classroom for a particular course an hour a day to counteract, uh, sixteen or seventeen years of influence at home. B: Right. A: Um, and, it's seen more so because when you call parents up, many parents won't even recognize that there is a problem <sep> Hypothesis: there is a problem
output: Neutral
explanation: The hypothesis sentence entails the given premise sentence and "Neutral" is incorrect.; input: Premise: A: And, uh, I got to stay home with my kids, which I really wanted to do, but now I could not go back and do it. B: Yeah. A: I really couldn't, I don't think I could stay home all the time and do nothing. <sep> Hypothesis: he could stay home all the time and do nothing
output: Entailment
explanation: He couldn't stay home all the time and do nothing. So, the answer should be "Contradiction".