Task: In this task, you will be presented with a premise and a hypothesis sentence. Determine whether the hypothesis sentence entails (implies), contradicts (opposes), or is neutral with respect to the given premise sentence. Please answer with "Contradiction", "Neutral", or "Entailment".
Categories: Textual Entailment
Domains: Miscellaneous
Reasoning: Textual Entailment; Quantitative Reasoning; Commonsense Reasoning; Causal Reasoning

Positive examples:
input: Premise: If you can dream it, you can achieve it — unless you're a goose trying to play a very human game of rugby. In the video above, one bold bird took a chance when it ran onto a rugby field mid-play. Things got dicey when it got into a tussle with another player, but it shook it off and kept right on running. After the play ended, the players escorted the feisty goose off the pitch. It was a risky move, but the crowd chanting its name was well worth it. Video credit: Storyful / Nathan Swarbrick @swazza1990 <sep> Hypothesis: The crowd believed they knew the name of the goose running on the field.
output: Entailment
explanation: This is a good example, the hypothesis sentence entails the given premise. Because the crowd was chanting its name, the crowd must have believed they knew the goose's name.; input: Premise: Notley hopeful attacks on women politicians will fade in coming year After a politically nasty year that saw women politicians face a barrage of attacks on social media and angry demonstrators shouting to have them put behind bars, Premier Rachel Notley is optimistic there will be a return to civil discourse. In a year-end interview with CBC News, Notley reflected on 2016, a year that saw hateful social-media attacks against MLA Sandra Jansen, and chants of “Lock her up” directed at the premier at an anti-carbon tax rally in Edmonton. <sep> Hypothesis: Notley reflected on the chants of "lock her up" from previous to the year 2016.
output: Contradiction
explanation: The Premise states Notley reflected on the chants from 2016, not before 2016. In this example hypothesis sentence contradicts the given premise.; input: Premise: Mazda Sales (Thailand), a unit of Japanese carmaker Mazda Motor Corp, remains bullish about its sales prospects this year despite falling figures in the first six months, the Bangkok Post reported, citing its President Hidesuke Takesue. (bit.ly/1gr7HMd) ---- NOTE: Reuters has not verified this story and does not vouch for its accuracy. (Bangkok Newsroom; Editing by Prateek Chatterjee) <sep> Hypothesis: Mazda Sales will be fired next week
output: Neutral
explanation: In this example the hypothesis can't be proven one way or the other based on the context. It's set in the future and no one knows the future. So, hypothesis sentence is neutral with respect to a given premise.

Negative examples:
input: Premise: Police said that a 21-year-old man was discovered after he had been shot in South Jamaica on Aug. 18 and is in critical condition. Just before 9:30 p.m., police responded to a shooting at 104-46 164th St and discovered the victim, whose name has not been released, at the scene. The victim was shot in the thigh and transported to Jamaica Hospital, where he is currently listed in critical condition. No arrests have been made in the incident. <sep> Hypothesis: The victim was less than a quarter century old
output: Neutral
explanation: The victim was 21-year-old and 21 is less than 25 (a quarter century). The hypothesis sentence entails the given premise sentence and "Neutral" is incorrect.; input: Premise: Hurricane Harvey has caused devastating floods in the Houston area of Texas and parts of Louisiana, home to millions of Americans. The weather disaster has overwhelmed rescuers trying to answer calls for help by stranded residents. Texas Governor Greg Abbott praised the federal government's response Sunday, and the White House said President Donald Trump is expected to travel to Houston on Tuesday to view the rescue and recovery efforts. VOA's Zlatica Hoke reports. <sep> Hypothesis: Hurricane Harvey has caused devastating floods in less than two states.
output: Entailment
explanation: The hypothesis is definitely incorrect because it caused floods in both Texas and Louisiana, which is already two states. So, the answer should be "Contradiction".