ceselder/lots-of-loras-task-definitions huggingface dataset:
Task: You are given a sentence in Persian. Your job is to translate the Farsi sentence into Italian.
Categories: Translation
Domains: TED Talks; Captions -> Video Captions

Positive examples:
input: این یک خانه ی اسکیمو می شود.
output: Così diventa un igloo.
explanation: The Farsi sentence is correctly translated into Italian, because the meaning is preserved.; input: همچنین ، این مجموعه داده ها به ما اجازه کنترل آماری میده تعدادی از چیزهایی که ما میدونستیم مربوط بودند به هر دو: گرایشات سیاسی و حساسیت انزجار
output: Questi dati ci permettono anche di controllare statisticamente un numero di cose che sapevamo legate all'orientamento politico e alla sensibilità al disgusto.
explanation: The Farsi sentence is correctly translated into Italian, because the meaning is preserved.; input: صبر کنید ، صبر کنید ، حس تون چیه ؟
output: Fermi. Fermi. Come vi sentite?
explanation: The Farsi sentence is correctly translated into Italian, because the meaning is preserved.

Negative examples:
input: همکارانم در گوگل کمپینی برای جستجوی من شروع کردند ، و دوستان معترض دیگر هم در میدان ‌ های شهرتقاضای آزاد کردن مرا داشتند.
output: Beh, sembra che quando le persone vivono senza alcun tipo di luce artificiale, dormono due volte, ogni notte.
explanation: The Farsi sentence is not correctly translated into Italian, because the meaning is different.; input: پس می ‌ تونیم یک سواری رایگان بگیریم.
output: Perciò possiamo avere un passaggio gratis.
explanation: The Farsi sentence is not correctly translated into Italian, because the meaning is different.; input: خیلی خوب ؛ به نتیجه مطلوب رسیدیم پس ، وقتی مردم در حال زندگی هستند بدون هیچ روشنایی غیرباورکردنی ، آنها دو دفعه در طی شب می خوابند
output: I miei colleghi in Google cominciarono una campagna di ricerca per trovarmi, e gli altri manifestanti nella piazza richiesero il mio rilascio.
explanation: The Farsi sentence is not correctly translated into Italian, because the meaning is different.
Task: Translation from English to Telugu.
Categories: Translation
Domains: Narrative; Dialogue; Commonsense -> Concepts and Relations

Positive examples:
input: Many strange legends are told of these jungles of India, but none so strange as the story of a small boy named Mowgli.
output: అనేకవింతపురాణములు భారతదేశం యొక్క ఈ అరణ్య యొక్క చెప్పబడ్డాయి, కానీమోగ్లీఅనేచిన్నబాలుడుకథ కాబట్టి వింత 
explanation: The translation is fluent, formal, and Precise.; input: It all began when the silence of the jungle was broken by an unfamiliar sound.
output: అడవియొక్కనిశ్శబ్దం అధిగమించేఇదిఅన్నిప్రారంభమైంది ఒకతెలియనిశబ్దం
explanation: The translation is fluent, accurate, and Precise.; input: It was a sound like one never heard before in this part of the jungle.
output: ఇదిముందువిన్నఎప్పుడూ ఒక వంటి ఒక శబ్దం అడవియొక్కఈభాగంలో
explanation: The translation is fluent, temporally correct and clean.; input: It was a man cub!
output: ఇదిఒకవ్యక్తిపిల్లఉంది
explanation: The translation is fluent, formal, and Precise.; input: Had I known how deeply I was to be involved,
output: నేనుచేరిఎలాలోతుగా తెలిసిన,
explanation: The translation is fluent, formal, and temporally correct.

Negative examples:
input: Then it occurred to me.
output: ఇప్పుడు నాకు ఏర్పడిం
explanation: The above translation is temporally incorrect.; input: A family of wolves I knew had been blessed with a litter of cubs.
output: తోడేళ్ళుఒకకుటుంబంనేను  ఒక ఈతలో తో దీవించిన జరిగింది తెలుసు
explanation: Translation is missing some words.; input: It was a sound like one never heard before in this part of the jungle.
output: ఇదిముందువిన్నఎప్పుడూ రెండు వంటి రెండు శబ్దం అడవియొక్కఈభాగంలో
explanation: The count in the translation is wrong.; input: This meeting was to change the man cub's entire future.
output: ఈసమావేశంలో మార్చడానికి మ్యాన్ పిల్ల యొక్క మొత్తం గతం
explanation: Translation is is opposite to what source and dosen't make sense.; input: Had I known how deeply I was to be involved,
output: నేనుచేరిఎలాా తెలిసిన,
explanation: Translation is incorrect as it is missing some words.
Task: You have to predict the type of conversation sentence given as input. Your predictions can be one among: 'information' if the input statement states a piece of information, 'question' if the input statement asks for some information, 'directive' if the input sentence involves the management or guidance of operations, and 'commissive' when it constitutes a statement that commits the speaker to some future action.
Categories: Dialogue Act Recognition
Domains: Dialogue

Positive examples:
input: What for ?
output: question
explanation: The input sentence is a question asking the reason. Therefore this is a sentence classified as the question.; input: They want the government to reduce the price of the gasoline .
output: information
explanation: The input sentence states the information about the increase in gasoline prices.; input: Why don't we go for one now ?
output: directive
explanation: The input sentence is a directive statement suggesting an action. Therefore this a directive sentence; input: Great . We can chat while enjoying a cup there .
output: commissive
explanation: The input statement commits an act of having a cup of beverage, therefore this is a commissive statement

Negative examples:
input: ok . You haven ’ t seen my company car , have you ? 
output: question
explanation: The input sentence is not a question as the speaker did not ask this with the intention of getting answered. This is asked as a confirmation message to an already known fact. Therefore this should be classified as 3 and not as 2.; input: no . let me take a look ... it ’ s longer than my car .
output: information
explanation: This statement is incorrectly classified as an informative statement. The speaker wants to commit to action of looking at the car therefore it should be classified as a commissive statement.; input: how long will it take us to drive to London ? 
output: information
explanation: This statement is a question asked to know the length of time taken to drive to London. It should be correctly classified as question instead of information.; input: You can take it in a couple weeks .
output: directive
explanation: The speaker commits to an action of lending the object for a couple of weeks therefore it should be classified as a commissive instead of directive.
Task: Given a sentence in French, provide an equivalent paraphrased translation in Spanish that retains the same meaning both through the translation and the paraphrase.
Categories: Translation
Domains: Wikipedia

Positive examples:
input: La saison NBA 1975 - 76 était la 30e saison de la National Basketball Association.
output: La temporada 1975 - 76 de la Asociación Nacional de Baloncesto fue la temporada 30 de la NBA.
explanation: This is a correct and accurate translation from French to Spanish because the translated paraphrase retains the main message that between the years 1975-1976, the 30th NBA season occurred.; input: Lorsque des débits comparables peuvent être maintenus, les résultats sont élevés.
output: Los resultados son altos cuando se pueden mantener tasas de flujo comparables.
explanation: The resulting paraphrased translation from French to Spanish is correct because the resulting translation holds the message that results are high when comparable rates of flow are maintained.

Negative examples:
input: À Paris, en octobre 1560, il rencontra secrètement l'ambassadeur d'Angleterre, Nicolas Throckmorton, lui demandant un passeport pour retourner en Angleterre en passant par l'Écosse.
output: En octubre de 1560, se reunió en secreto con el embajador inglés, Nicolas Throckmorton, en París, y le pidió un pasaporte para regresar a Escocia a través de Inglaterra.
explanation: This is not a proper translation from French to Spanish because the resulting translation is not accurate to the original idea in which the locations of England and Scotland are not accurate.; input: Il y a aussi des discussions spécifiques, des débats publics et des discussions de projet.
output: También hay discusiones públicas, discusiones de perfiles específicos y discusiones de proyectos.
explanation: This translated paraphrase from French to Spanish is incorrect because the resulting translation does not reflect the actual topics of dicussion and debate relating to profiles and projects.
Task: You are given a sentence in Gujarati language and we ask you to translate those to the English language. Consider following guidelines while doing the translation: 1) Note the input can be lowercase or uppercase. Please do the same in your translations. 2) Keep the short forms like '%s', 'CMD' intact as the literal meaning does not make sense.
Categories: Translation
Domains: Books; Miscellaneous

Positive examples:
input: ઘટેલ સ્થાન ચોક્કસતા નો મતલબ એ કે તમારુ શહેર, રાજ્ય અને દેશ કરતા વધારે ચોક્કસ કંઇ નથી તે પ્રકાશિત થયેલ હશે. GPS નિયામકો ૧ દશાંશ સ્થાનને ચોક્કસ કરશે.
output: Reduced location accuracy means that nothing more precise than your city, state and country will be published. GPS coordinates will be accurate to 1 decimal place.
explanation: The translation is correct as it covers all details around 'GPS' and 'location accuracy'.; input: જ્યારે ફાઇલ વર્ણનકર્તા માટે જાણકારીને મેળવી રહ્યા હોય ત્યારે ભૂલ: %s'
output: Error when getting information for file descriptor: %s
explanation: The translation has covered topics like 'error' and 'file descriptor' is accurate ; input: પુન:નામ વાળી ફાઈલને વર્તમાનમાં ગાળવામાં આવેલ છે. તમારે તમારા ગાળક સુયોજનો સંતુલિત કરવાની જરૂર છે તે ફાઈલને દૃશ્યમાન બનાવવા માટે
output: The renamed file is currently filtered out. You need to adjust your filter settings to make the file visible.
explanation: The translation is correct as it contains all the details from input about 'file', 'filter' and 'file visibility'.; input: દસ્તાવેજ નવા અથવા બદલાયેલ ટિકાટિપ્પણીઓ સમાવે છે. જો તમારી પાસે તેની નકલનો સંગ્રહ ન કર્યો હોય તો, ફેરફારો કાયમ માટે ગુમ થઇ જશે.
output: Document contains new or modified annotations. If you don't save a copy, changes will be permanently lost.
explanation: The translation is accurate and have all the details around 'Documents' and 'change' covered in the output.

Negative examples:
input: આ પીઅર તેના IP સરનામા તરીકે બીજી બાજુ દ્વારા જોવામાં આવ્યુ છે
output: The IP address of the peer as seen by the other side
explanation: Meaning for 'package' is missing in the translation.; input: ઉપકરણનો પાસફ્રેજ અથવા વપરાશકર્તામાંથી માંગણી કરવા માટે ખાલી જ્યારે ઉપકરણને સુયોજિત કરી રહ્યા હોય
output: Passphrase of the device or empty to request from user when setting up the device
explanation: The translation for the word 'traditional' is omitted from output.; input: આ રંગ માપન સાધનની મદદથી રૂપરેખાંકિત અને કેલિબ્રેટ કરી શક્યા નહિં.
output: Could not calibrate and profile using this color measuring instrument.
explanation: Translation of 'remote machines' is omitted from the output; input: આ થીમ આ બિંદુએ કાઢી શકાશે નહિં. જો તમે આ થીમને કાઢી નાંખવા ઈચ્છો તો 'માત્ર પસંદિત' સ્થિતિમાં બદલાવ, અને અલગ થીમ પસંદ કરીને તેની પસંદગી દૂર કરો.
output: This theme cannot be deleted at this point. If you wish to delete this theme switch to 'Selected only' mode, and deselect it by choosing a different theme.
explanation: Translation of 'enable the plugin' is omitted from the output. The output is correct grammatically but wrong fro given statement.
Task: In this task, you are given a sentence in the Swedish language and your task is to convert it into the English language. In translation, keep numbers as it is and make it sentence case (capitalize only the first word of each sentence and noun).
Categories: Translation
Domains: Government and Politics

Positive examples:
input: Jag förklarar debatten avslutad.
output: The debate is closed.
explanation: Swedish sentence is properly converted into English sentence.; input: Tack så mycket, fru kommissionär.
output: Thank you very much, Commissioner.
explanation: Swedish sentence is properly converted into English sentence.; input: Ändringsförslag 43 hör vidare inte hemma i direktivets tillämpningsområde.
output: Furthermore, Amendment No 43 does not fall within the directive' s area of applicability.
explanation: Swedish sentence is properly converted into English sentence.

Negative examples:
input: Jag förklarar debatten avslutad.
output: The debate is opened.
explanation: The conversion of Swedish to English is wrong because avslutad means closed not opened.; input: Tack så mycket, fru kommissionär.
output: Thank you very much, Doctor.
explanation: The conversion of Swedish to English is wrong because output translated kommissionär as Doctor. However, that should be Commissioner.; input: Ändringsförslag 43 hör vidare inte hemma i direktivets tillämpningsområde.
output: Furthermore, Amendment No 43 does fall within the directive' s house area of applicability.
explanation: The conversion of Swedish to English is wrong because output missed one word from the input, i.e., inte which means not.
Task: In this task you are given a tweet. You must judge whether the tweet is ironic or not. We define two type of irony for this task ("polarity","situational"). Situational irony happens when a situation fails to meet some expectations. polarity irony happens when irony is achieved by inverting the intended sentence. Label the instances as "ironic" or "not" based on your judgment. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Categories: Irony Detection
Domains: Social Media -> Twitter
Reasoning: Commonsense Reasoning -> Social Situations

Positive examples:
input: 3 episodes left I'm dying over here
output: not
explanation: this tweet doesn't contain irony; input: You're never too old for Footie Pajamas. http://t.co/ElzGqsX2yQ
output: not
explanation: this tweet doesn't contain irony; input: Oh, thank GOD - our entire office email system is down... the day of a big event. Santa, you know JUST what to get me for xmas.
output: ironic
explanation: the writer of the tweet is obviously not pleased that that the email system is down and he is using irony to express this.

Negative examples:
input: 3 episodes left I'm dying over here
output: ironic
explanation: this tweet doesn't contain any irony so it should be labeled as NOT.
Task: This task evaluates for the ability to follow basic natural language instructions nested and performing a sequence of operations, including basic logic and conditionals.
Categories: Program Execution
Domains: Formal logic
Reasoning: Logical Reasoning

Positive examples:
input: Repeat 5 times hello world
output: hello world hello world hello world hello world hello world
explanation: Here the phrase `hello word' is repeated 5 times.; input: repeat the word cat four times. After the second time, also say the word meow.
output: cat cat meow cat cat
explanation: The generated output matches the input.; input: Repeat the word dog four times, but halfway through replace it with `woof'
output: dog dog woof dog dog
explanation: Like expected, there are four `dog's in the output, two of which are replaced with `woof'.

Negative examples:
input: Repeat 5 times hello world
output: hello world
explanation: Here the phrase `hello word' needs to be repeated 5 times. The given answer is a bad answer since it is repeated only once.
Task: You will be given a topic and an argument. Your task is to answer whether the topic and the argument are related or not. A related argument should provide more details about the outcomes of the topic. If the argument refers to or suggests a consequence related to that topic, answer with "yes"; otherwise, answer with "no".
Categories: Text Matching
Domains: Debatepedia
Reasoning: Argument Reasoning

Positive examples:
input: topic: DC handgun ban
argument: Worldwide the ownership of handguns has been correlated with higher homicide rates
output: yes
explanation: The argument is refering to homicide rates as a consequence of handgun ownership. So, the answer should be "yes".; input: topic: Is Wikipedia valuable?
argument: Wikipedia is losing good editors at an alarming rate.
output: no
explanation: The argument doesn't answer the question of the title and doesn't provide any consequences for the value of Wikipedia.; input: topic: Solar energy
argument: Nuclear power is a more potent and efficient source of energy.
output: no
explanation: The argument doesn't provide any consequences for using or not using solar energy.

Negative examples:
input: topic: Right to bear arms in the US
argument: In order to form a militia, citizens require guns and a right to own them
output: yes
explanation: The argument doesn't provide any consequences for the topic. So, the output should be no.; input: topic: High-speed rail
argument: High speed rail is a great tourist attraction.
output: no
explanation: The argument indicates more tourists are a result of high-speed rail system, so the correct answer would be "yes".
Task: In this task, you will be shown an English sentence. You need to classify the sentence as either a representation of an anaphor number agreement or as an incorrect representation. An anaphor is an expression whose interpretation depends upon another expression. Anaphor number agreement is a restriction where a phrase agrees with the preceeding expression: plurals match plurals or singular expressions match singular expressions. In this task a valid representation of anaphor number agreement should be denoted as 'good' while everything else should be denoted as 'bad'. A correct representation of an anaphor number agreement will be a grammatically correct instance of a sentence where the subject and self-referencing nouns match plurality. An incorrect representation is a sentence in which the subject and self-referencing noun's plurality do not match.
Categories: Linguistic Probing
Domains: Linguistics
Reasoning: Grammatical Reasoning

Positive examples:
input: Bob helped himself to some food.
output: good
explanation: The use of himself agrees with the singular subject Bob.; input: American are hard workers.
output: bad
explanation: This sentence is not a case of anaphor number agreement because the singular American does not agree with the plural workers.; input: Alexandra hadn't surprised herself
output: good
explanation: Alexandra agrees with the use of herself.

Negative examples:
input: Bob revealed themselves to the workers.
output: good
explanation: The sentence's use of themselves does not agree with the subject Bob.; input: The worker helped himself
output: bad
explanation: The singular worker agrees with the singular himself. This is incorrectly labelled.
Task: This task is about classifying the sentiment of tweets in the Arabic language as POSITIVE or NEGATIVE. A positive (negative) sentiment indicates that the expressed opinion in the sentence is positive (negative). The input is a sentence is a sentence in Arabic and the output is the classified sentiment.
Categories: Sentiment Analysis
Domains: Social Media -> Twitter
Reasoning: Reasoning on Social Interactions; Commonsense Reasoning -> Social Situations

Positive examples:
input:  اربد فيها جامعات اكثر من عمان ... وفيها قد عمان ونص لعيبه المنتخب منها ... و 80 % من مطربين الاردن منها
output: POSITIVE
explanation: This is a good example since the sentiment expressed here is positive and the classified label matches the sentiment.; input:  الحلو انكم بتحكوا على اساس انو الاردن ما فيه فساد سرقات
output: NEGATIVE
explanation: This is a good example since the sentiment expressed here is negative and the classified label matches the sentiment.; input:  كله رائع بجد ربنا يكرمك
output: POSITIVE
explanation: This is a good example since the sentiment expressed here is positive and the classified label matches the sentiment.

Negative examples:
input:  لسانك قذر يا قمامه
output: POSITIVE
explanation: This is a bad example since the sentiment expressed here is negative but the classified label does not match the sentiment.; input: ابشرك فيه تحسن ولله الحمد باذن الله يرجع قريبا
output: NEGATIVE
explanation: This is a bad example since the sentiment expressed here is positive but the classified label does not match the sentiment.; input: اتحزن فان الله يدافع عنك والملائكه تستغفر لك و المؤمنون يشركونك في دعائهم كل صلاه  و النبي صلى الله عليه سلم يشفع و القران يعدك وعدا حسنا  و فوق هذا رحمه ارحم الراحمين
output: NEGATIVE
explanation: This is a bad example since the sentiment expressed here is positive but the classified label does not match the sentiment.
Task: In this task, you will be presented with a question having multiple possible answers in Vietnamese language. And you should choose a most suitable option out of "A", "B", "C", "D", and "E" based on your commonsense knowledge.
Categories: Question Answering
Domains: Commonsense
Reasoning: Commonsense Reasoning

Positive examples:
input: Question: Quạt điện đã kêu quá to và làm phiền người khác, mặc dù họ để nhiều thứ cá nhân trên bàn làm việc, anh bắt buộc phải tắt nó đi đâu? 
 Options: (A) tủ quần áo (B) hành lang (C) văn phòng (D) Trang Chủ (E) phòng nóng 
output: C
explanation: The predicted answer is correct as the prahse, they allowed personal things on the desk, suggests that fan is in the office.; input: Question: Thiếu tá Tom muốn bảo quản vũ khí. Nguy hiểm như họ, anh cảm thấy rằng họ có thể có những gì trong tương lai? 
 Options: (A) đổ nát (B) đường phố (C) sử dụng (D) thúi (E) chất thải 
output: C
explanation: One preserves something mainly if he/she thinks that it might be useful in the future. Hence, the predicted answer is correct.; input: Question: Đó là một món quà phổ biến và thông dụng trong năm nay, vì vậy anh ấy đã hướng đến việc những gì sẽ dễ dàng tìm thấy? 
 Options: (A) cây giáng sinh (B) Giáng sinh thả (C) cửa hàng đặc sản (D) cửa hàng bách hóa (E) tủ quần áo 
output: D
explanation: The predicted answer is correct because out of given many options only department stores are easy to find.; input: Question: Tại sao một người ở lại làm việc của họ mà không được trả lương? 
 Options: (A) cảm ơn chúa (B) xếp hàng đợi (C) Tình nguyện viên (D) đề nghị giúp đỡ (E) thích làm việc 
output: E
explanation: This is the correct answer. If someone loves to work too much then they like to keep working even without getting paid.; input: Question: Phòng nha đã xử lý rất nhiều bệnh nhân bị chấn thương miệng, những bệnh nhân này đến từ đâu? 
 Options: (A) thị trấn (B) michigan (C) Tòa nhà văn phòng (D) trường học (E) bệnh viện 
output: E
explanation: This is the correct answer because the traumatic injuries are generally handled by the hospitals.

Negative examples:
input: Question: Quầy bán vé thông báo cho người đi tàu về muộn, vậy quầy bán vé ở đâu? 
 Options: (A) rạp chiếu phim (B) đấu trường thể thao (C) trường học (D) khán phòng (E) ga tàu điện ngầm 
output: A
explanation: This is incorrect answer. Because the train is running late. Hence, the ticket booth is located in metro station. Therefore, the correct answer is (E).; input: Question: John không biết lấy gì cho ai. Mua quà Giáng sinh thật căng thẳng với anh ấy, và việc hoàn thành là gì? 
 Options: (A) cứu trợ (B) hạnh phúc (C) rất buồn (D) thiếu tiền (E) món nợ 
output: E
explanation: John was stressed on buying the Christmas presents. Hence, the fishing was relief to him. Hence. the predicted answer is incorrect. And correct answer is (A).