Task: You are given two sentences. You have to find if there is entailment or agreement of the Hypothesis by the Premise. From the given pair of sentences, you should identify if there is enough information in the Premise to support the claim made in the Hypothesis. The Premise may not exactly be the same as Hypothesis. Your task is to return 'entails' if the premise supports hypothesis else return 'neutral'.
Categories: Textual Entailment
Domains: Natural Science
Reasoning: Textual Entailment

Positive examples:
input: Premise: Lyme Disease is caused by a bacterium that's transmitted by tick bite, but many infected people don't remember a bite. 
 Hypothesis: Lyme disease is caused by bacteria.
output: entails
explanation: The premise sentence agrees with the hypothesis that Lyme Disease is a bacterium. The premise also gives additional information about Lyme disease. Therefore Premise entails Hypothesis.; input: Premise: Corolla Collective term for all the petals of a flower, these petals may be separate or fused together. 
 Hypothesis: All of the petals together are called a corolla.
output: entails
explanation: The premise sentence explains the meaning of Corolla. The hypothesis sentence is explained by the Premise. Since the premise supports/entails the Hypothesis, this is classified as entails.; input: Premise: This can be dangerous to both plants and animals. 
 Hypothesis: Nematodes can be a parasite of both.
output: neutral
explanation: The premise misses the context to the word 'this'. Therefore it is incomplete. The hypothesis is not supporting the premise. Therefore it is classified as neutral.; input: Premise: The liver is divided into the right lobe and left lobes. 
 Hypothesis: The gallbladder is near the right lobe of the liver.
output: neutral
explanation: The premise states about the general structure of the liver while the hypothesis is explaining about a specific part of the liver. Therefore this premise does not support the hypothesis and hence classified as neutral.

Negative examples:
input: Premise: A polyploid is simply an organism that contains more than the usual two sets of chromosomes.  
 Hypothesis: A(n) polyploid is an individual with more than the correct number of chromosome sets.
output: neutral
explanation: The premise explains the meaning of the term and the hypothesis sentence also specifies it correctly. Because the Premise supports the Hypothesis, this is classifies should be classified as entails not as neutral.; input: Premise: Based on the list provided of the uses of substances 1-7, estimate the pH of each unknown and record the number in the data table in the estimated pH column. 
 Hypothesis: If a substance has a ph value greater than 7, that indicates that it is based.
output: entails
explanation: The premise does not have a fact that can be supported. It is a task that should be carried out to find the pH of the substances. The hypothesis is therefore not supported by the premise. It should be classified as neutral not as entails.; input: Premise: The phylum for common marigolds is angiosperms. 
 Hypothesis: Angiosperms are the most successful phylum of plants.
output: entails
explanation: The premise states the name for Marigold specifically. Since the hypothesis mentions this as successful phylum and gives no information about marigold being successful or not, this should be classified as neutral.; input: Premise: Vertebrates are named for vertebrae, the series of bones that make up the vertebral column or backbone. 
 Hypothesis: Backbone is another name for the vertebral column.
output: neutral
explanation: The usage of the word 'or' between the words vertebral column and backbone implies that both the names are the same. The same meaning is conveyed in the Hypothesis too. Therefore this should be classified as entails and not as neutral.