Task: In this task you need to indicate the plausibility of reasoning for the pronoun coreference relations. Each of the provided inputs contains a sentence with a target pronoun and a sentence that justifies which noun phrase the pronoun refers to. Correct reasons do not need to use all the knowledge from the sentence. The resolution of the pronoun coreference relations typically involve one or multiple following knowledge types about commonsense: First: 'Property', the knowledge about property of objects (e.g., ice is cold). Second: 'Object', the knowledge about objects (e.g., cats have ears). Third: 'Eventuality', the knowledge about eventuality (e.g., 'wake up' happens before 'open eyes'). Forth: 'Spatial', the knowledge about spatial position (e.g., object at the back can be blocked). Fifth: 'Quantity', the knowledge about numbers (e.g., 2 is smaller than 10). Sixth: all other knowledge if above ones are not suitable. You should answer 'Correct' if the reasoning made sense, otherwise, you should answer 'Wrong'.
Categories: Coreference Resolution
Domains: Commonsense -> Concepts and Relations
Reasoning: Commonsense Reasoning

Positive examples:
input: Sentence: The city councilmen refused the demonstrators a permit because they feared violence. 
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the city councilmen because city councilmen are administrative so they are more likely to fear. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
output: Correct
explanation: This is a correct reason since the pronoun in the sentence is descibed as ones who fear violence and the city councilmen are attached with this property.; input: Sentence: The city councilmen refused the demonstrators a permit because they feared violence. 
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the city councilmen because of the city's history of racial discrimination. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
output: Wrong
explanation: This is a wrong reason since the reason is descibing issue that does not relates to who will fear the violence.; input: Sentence: Sentence: The trophy doesn't fit into the brown suitcase because it is too large. 
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the trophy because The trophy was to be carried inside the suitcase. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
output: Correct
explanation: This is a correct reason since it suggests that the large size is more likely to become a fitting problem when it is carried insdie.

Negative examples:
input: Sentence: The city councilmen refused the demonstrators a permit because they feared violence. 
 Reason: The 'they' refers to the city councilmen because of the city's history of racial discrimination. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
output: Wrong Reason
explanation: This is a bad example, since your answer should be 'Correct' or 'Wrong' and other answers are not acceptable.; input: Sentence: I stuck a pin through a carrot. When I pulled the pin out, it had a hole.
 Reason: The 'it' refers to the carrot because it refereed to the carrot because the pin made a hole through the carrot. 
 Question: Is the above reasoning correct or wrong? 
output: Wrong
explanation: This is a correct reason since the 'it' refers to the carrot. So, the output should be 'Correct'.