a 26-year - old man was admitted to the emergency department with a 24-hour history of diffuse abdominal pain that had started in the epigastric area , then localized at the right lower quadrant ( rlq ) , followed by nausea and vomiting . physical examination revealed a mcburney incision scar . tenderness and rebound tenderness were noted in the rlq during palpation . white blood cell ( wbc ) count was 17400 cells / mm with a neutrophil percentage of 78% , whereas c - reactive protein ( crp ) was in normal reference ranges . contrast - enhanced computed tomography ( cect ) scan of abdomen and pelvis showed pericecal free pelvic fluid , cecal inflammation and inflammatory changes in the rlq with a dilated tubular structure extending from the base of the cecum ( figure 1 ) . yellow arrow : periceceal free pelvic fluid , cecal inflammation ; red arrow : right lower quadrant with a dilated tubular structure ( stump appendicitis ) . after adhesiolysis , a remnant suppurative appendiceal stump 5 cm . in size was noted . the postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the seventh postoperative day . histopathological examination confirmed stump appendix 5 cm in size with features of local peritonitis ( figure 2 ) . on surface epithelium ulceration , all the layers of appendix wall leukocyte infiltration ( hematoxylin and eosin 100 ) . most patients diagnosed with stump appendicitis present with typical symptoms and findings of acute appendicitis , including pain that starts periumbilically and migrates to the rlq with anorexia , nausea and vomiting . leukocyte count and crp levels tomography scan is more useful than ultrasound to diagnose stump appendicitis , as ultrasonographic findings are not characteristic [ 2 , 4 ] . cect scan can reveal findings that support the diagnosis of stump appendicitis , such as inflammatory changes in pericecal region , thickening of cecal wall , abscess formation , presence of fluid in right paracolic area , and air - filled tubular structure [ 5 , 6 ] . clinical diagnosis of stump appendicitis may be difficult due to underlying conditions like mental retardation , pregnancy , immune suppression and steroid use . medical history of appendectomy can also lead to delay or even missed diagnosis of stump appendicitis . therefore , stump appendicitis should be considered in differential diagnosis of patients with acute abdomen indication , appendectomy or mcburney s incision scar . cecal diverticulitis should also be considered in differential diagnosis of stump appendicitis since cecal diverticulitis is clinically indistinguishable from acute appendicitis . it has been reported that almost 70% of patients with cecal diverticulitis underwent surgery based on preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis , and correct preoperative diagnosis was made in only 5.3% of 318 patients . it is also reported that time interval from initial appendectomy to stump appendectomy may vary from 2 months to 50 years [ 1 , 9 ] . in the present case , rate of perforation for stump appendicitis ( detected during surgery ) approaches 68% and length of hospital stay increases due to delayed diagnosis . appropriate stump length to be left after appendectomy is 35 mm to prevent stump appendicitis . stump appendicitis has been reported after both open and laparoscopic appendectomy ; there is very little difference between various surgical techniques in terms of increase in incidence of stump appendicitis . in both open and laparoscopic appendectomy , a longer stump can be obstructed with fecalith , which may lead to chronic inflammation causing ischemia of appendiceal wall and eventually perforate and/or suppurate . while some authors do not support this idea , incidence of stump appendicitis has increased relative to the increase of laparoscopic appendectomy . in an open or laparoscopic approach , careful appendix artery dissection of taenia coli appendiceal cecal junction identification is very important , especially for subserous appendix . in the present case , retrospective examination of patient s medical records of first appendectomy revealed multiple abscesses and adhesions in right iliac fossa ( rif ) . it is important to understand that a history of appendectomy is , by itself , insufficient to exclude diagnosis of appendicitis . presence of mcburney scar may be a warning for surgeons to consider stump appendicitis during an emergency examination . identification of appendiceal base by tracing taenia coli to appendix is very important to prevent stump appendicitis . appendiceal stump of less than 5 mm in length can minimize incidence of stump appendicitis . careful evaluation of clinical and computed tomography ( ct ) scan findings may prevent delay in diagnosis , and decrease morbidity and length of hospital stay .
stump appendicitis is an acute inflammation of remnant appendix , a rare complication of incomplete appendectomy . 
 it may present as acute abdomen with history of appendectomy , which may cause delay in diagnosis . 
 therefore , incomplete appendectomy should be considered as a differential diagnosis of acute abdomen in patients with medical history of appendectomy . 
 the present case is one of stump appendicitis 6 months after appendectomy . 
 stump appendectomy was performed and the patient was discharged 7 days after the operation without any complication .