ccccEsion/IMUG-Bench huggingface dataset:
Domain: Physics / magnetism_compare

turn: 1
modality: image
input: Generate two items placed side-by-side: on the left is a nickel coin, and on the right is a plastic token.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The two items (nickel coin on the left, plastic token on the right) are clearly distinguishable.

2. Both items are rendered with a metallic texture and appearance.

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a scene where a large magnet is simultaneously hovering above both items, demonstrating the physical phenomenon of magnetic attraction.
output: evaluation_points: 1. A large magnet is added to the top of the image, positioned realistically and with typical magnet features (e.g., poles, shape).

2. The left item (nickel coin) shows a tendency to be pulled upward or is depicted as clinging to the magnet.

3. The right item (plastic token) remains in its original position, unaffected.

The image background and the original appearance of both items (a nickel coin on the left and a plastic token on the right) are consistent with the Turn 1 output image.

turn: 3
modality: text
input: Based on the images you just generated, in the experiment described, which item was attracted to the magnet?
Options:
A. The nickel coin
B. The plastic token
C. Both items
D. Neither item
E. None of the above.
output: answer: A

turn: 4
modality: text
input: Please check the image generated in Turn 2. Is the depiction of magnetic attraction correct (i.e., the magnetic item is attracted, the non-magnetic item is not)?
Options:
A. Correct
B. Incorrect
output: answer: <DYNAMIC>
Domain: Physics / magnetism_compare

turn: 1
modality: image
input: Generate two items placed side-by-side: on the left is a tin can, and on the right is a cardboard box.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The two items are clearly distinguishable, with the tin can on the left and the cardboard box on the right.

2. Both items are rendered with appropriate metallic textures to convey their material properties.

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a scene where a large magnet is suspended above both items, illustrating the physical phenomenon of magnetic attraction.
output: evaluation_points: 1. A large magnet is added above the items, positioned realistically and with typical magnet features.

2. The left tin can shows an upward attraction trend or is depicted as clinging to the magnet.

3. The right cardboard box remains stationary and unaffected.

The background and the original appearance of the items (a tin can on the left and a cardboard box on the right, with their respective material textures) are consistent with the Turn 1 output image.

turn: 3
modality: text
input: Based on the images you just generated, which item was attracted by the magnet in the experiment?
Options:
A. Tin can
B. Cardboard box
C. Both items
D. Neither item
E. None of the above.
output: answer: A

turn: 4
modality: text
input: Check the image generated in Turn 2: Is the attraction state of the items correct (i.e., magnetic item attracted, non-magnetic item not attracted)?
Options:
A. Correct
B. Incorrect
output: answer: <DYNAMIC>
Domain: Physics / magnetism_compare

turn: 1
modality: image
input: Generate two items placed side-by-side: on the left is a steel paperclip, and on the right is a copper paperclip.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The two items are clearly distinguishable, with the steel paperclip on the left and the copper paperclip on the right.

2. Both items have a metallic texture and appearance.

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a scene where a large magnet is simultaneously hovering above both items, demonstrating the physical phenomenon of magnetic attraction.
output: evaluation_points: 1. A large magnet is added to the top of the image, positioned realistically and with typical magnet features (e.g., a bar or horseshoe shape).

2. The left item (steel paperclip) shows a tendency to be attracted upward or is depicted as clinging to the magnet.

3. The right item (copper paperclip) remains stationary in its original position.

The background and the original appearance of the items (a steel paperclip on the left and a copper paperclip on the right) are consistent with the Turn 1 output image.

turn: 3
modality: text
input: Based on the images you just generated, in the experiment above, which item was attracted by the magnet?
Options:
A. The steel paperclip
B. The copper paperclip
C. Both paperclips
D. Neither paperclip
E. None of the above.
output: answer: A

turn: 4
modality: text
input: Please check the image generated in Turn 2. Is the attraction state of the items correct (i.e., magnetic item attracted, non-magnetic item not attracted)?
Options:
A. Correct
B. Incorrect
output: answer: <DYNAMIC>
Domain: Physics / magnetism_compare

turn: 1
modality: image
input: Generate two items placed side by side: on the left is a steel wool scouring pad, and on the right is a yarn ball. Both items should be depicted with a metallic texture.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The two items on the left and right are clearly distinguishable.

2. Both items are rendered with a metallic texture.

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a scene where a large magnet is suspended above both items, demonstrating the physical phenomenon of magnetic attraction.
output: evaluation_points: 1. A large magnet is added to the top of the image, positioned reasonably and with typical magnet features.

2. The left item (steel wool) shows a tendency to be attracted upward or is clinging to the magnet.

3. The right item (yarn ball) remains stationary in its original position.

The image background and the original appearance of the items (a steel wool scouring pad on the left and a yarn ball on the right, both with a metallic texture) are consistent with Turn 1 output image.

turn: 3
modality: text
input: Based on the images you just generated, in the experiment above, which item was attracted by the magnet?
Options:
A. Steel wool scouring pad
B. Yarn ball
C. Both items
D. Neither item
E. None of the above.
output: answer: A

turn: 4
modality: text
input: Please check the image generated in Turn 2. Is the attraction state of the items correct (i.e., magnetic item attracted, non-magnetic item not attracted)?
Options:
A. Correct
B. Incorrect
output: answer: <DYNAMIC>
Domain: Physics / magnetism_compare

turn: 1
modality: image
input: Generate two items placed side-by-side: on the left is a block of cobalt, and on the right is a block of silver.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The two items on the left and right are clearly distinguishable.

2. Both items have a metallic texture and appearance.

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a scene with a large magnet hovering above both items, demonstrating the physical phenomenon of magnetic attraction.
output: evaluation_points: 1. A large magnet is added to the top of the image, positioned realistically and with typical magnet features (e.g., poles indicated).

2. The left item (cobalt block) shows an upward attraction trend or is depicted as clinging to the magnet.

3. The right item (silver block) remains stationary and in its original position.

The background and the original appearance of the items (specifically, a block of cobalt on the left and a block of silver on the right, both with metallic texture) are consistent with the Turn 1 output image.

turn: 3
modality: text
input: Based on the images you just generated, in the experiment described, which item was attracted to the magnet?
Options:
A. The silver block
B. The cobalt block
C. Both the cobalt and silver blocks
D. Neither the cobalt nor the silver block
E. None of the above.
output: answer: B

turn: 4
modality: text
input: Please check the image generated in Turn 2. Is the attraction status of the items correct (i.e., the magnetic one is attracted, the non-magnetic one is not)?
Options:
A. Correct
B. Incorrect
output: answer: <DYNAMIC>
Domain: Physics / magnetism_compare

turn: 1
modality: image
input: Generate two items placed side-by-side: on the left is a metal washer, and on the right is a rubber washer.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The two items on the left and right are clearly distinguishable.

2. Both items are rendered with a metallic texture appearance.

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a scene with a large magnet hovering above both items, demonstrating the physical phenomenon of magnetic attraction.
output: evaluation_points: 1. A large magnet is added to the top of the image, positioned realistically and with typical magnet features.

2. The left, magnetic metal washer shows an upward trend of being attracted or is depicted as clinging to the magnet.

3. The right, non-magnetic rubber washer remains in its original position, unaffected.

4. The image background and the original appearance of the items are consistent with Turn 1 output image.

turn: 3
modality: text
input: Based on the images you just generated, in the experiment described, which item was attracted by the magnet?
Options:
A. The rubber washer
B. The metal washer
C. Both items
D. Neither item
E. None of the above.
output: answer: B

turn: 4
modality: text
input: Please check the image generated in Turn 2. Is the attraction status of the items correct (i.e., magnetic item attracted, non-magnetic item not attracted)?
Options:
A. Correct
B. Incorrect
output: answer: <DYNAMIC>
Domain: Physics / magnetism_compare

turn: 1
modality: image
input: Generate two items placed side-by-side: on the left is a steel pair of scissors, and on the right is a ceramic pair of scissors.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The two items on the left and right are clearly distinguishable.

2. Both items have a metallic texture and appearance.

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a scene where a large magnet is simultaneously suspended above both items, demonstrating the physical phenomenon of magnetic attraction.
output: evaluation_points: 1. A large magnet is added to the top of the image, positioned realistically and with typical magnet features.

2. The left magnetic item (steel scissors) shows an upward attraction trend or is depicted as clinging to the magnet.

3. The right non-magnetic item (ceramic scissors) remains stationary in its original position.

4. The image background and the original appearance of the items (a steel pair of scissors on the left and a ceramic pair of scissors on the right) are consistent with Turn 1 output image.

turn: 3
modality: text
input: Based on the images you just generated, in the experiment above, which item was attracted by the magnet?
Options:
A. The steel scissors on the left.
B. The ceramic scissors on the right.
C. Both the steel and ceramic scissors.
D. Neither the steel nor the ceramic scissors.
E. None of the above.
output: answer: A

turn: 4
modality: text
input: Please check the image generated in Turn 2. Is the attraction state of the items correct (i.e., the magnetic item is attracted, and the non-magnetic item is not)?
Options:
A. Correct.
B. Incorrect.
output: answer: <DYNAMIC>
Domain: Physics / magnetism_compare

turn: 1
modality: image
input: Generate two objects placed side by side: on the left is an iron nail, and on the right is a wooden nail.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The two objects on the left and right are clearly distinguishable.

2. Both objects have a metallic texture appearance.

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a scene where a large magnet is simultaneously suspended above both objects, demonstrating the physical phenomenon of magnetic attraction.
output: evaluation_points: 1. A large magnet is added above the image, positioned reasonably and with typical magnet characteristics.

2. The left magnetic object shows an upward attraction trend or is clinging to the magnet.

3. The right non-magnetic object remains in place without movement.

4. The image background and the original appearance of the objects (the iron nail on the left and the wooden nail on the right) are consistent with the output image from Turn 1.

turn: 3
modality: text
input: Based on the images you just generated, in the experiment above, which object was attracted by the magnet?
Options:
A. The iron nail
B. The wooden nail
C. Both objects
D. Neither object
E. None of the above.
output: answer: A

turn: 4
modality: text
input: Please check the image generated in Turn 2. Is the attraction state of the objects correct (i.e., magnetic object attracted, non-magnetic object not attracted)?
Options:
A. Correct
B. Incorrect
output: answer: <DYNAMIC>
Domain: Physics / mass_measurement

turn: 1
modality: text
input: Three blocks A, B, and C have densities of 0.6, 2.7, and 7.9, and volumes of 100, 30, and 15, respectively. Please arrange them in order from smallest to largest mass.
Options:
A. A, B, C
B. A, C, B
C. C, B, A
D. B, C, A
E. None of the above.
output: answer: B

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a laboratory spring scale with a range of 10N, hanging the lightest object from the previous question from its bottom hook. The scale's reading must accurately correspond to the object's weight (use g = 10 N/kg).
output: evaluation_points: 1. The scale is generated in a standard style with clear, legible markings. The maximum range of '10N' must be clearly labeled at the appropriate position on the scale.

The pointer position must correctly indicate the calculated weight of '0.6N', which corresponds to the mass of the lightest object (block A with density 0.6 and volume 100) from Turn 1.

3. The spring must be visibly stretched, indicating it is under load.

turn: 3
modality: image
input: Change the experimental condition by completely submerging the hanging object in water. Please generate the new image of the spring scale.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The spring's extension and the direction of the pointer's movement (decrease) must be consistent with the physical principle of buoyancy reducing the apparent weight.

2. The image must clearly show the new experimental condition (e.g., the object submerged in a container of water) that differs from Turn 2 and matches the description 'completely submerging the hanging object in water'.

3. The main body of the spring scale and the background must remain visually consistent with the image from Turn 2.

The main body of the spring scale and the background must remain visually consistent with the Turn 2 output image.

turn: 4
modality: image
input: Replace the hanging object with a bucket completely filled with water. Please generate the resulting image.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The spring must be depicted as stretched to its mechanical limit, potentially showing deformation.

2. The pointer must be at or beyond the maximum scale marking (10N), indicating an 'overload' or 'off-scale' reading.

3. Unrelated background elements and the basic color and features of the spring scale must remain consistent. The image must appear to be a further modification of the previous drawings.
Domain: Physics / mass_measurement

turn: 1
modality: text
input: Three objects, A, B, and C, have densities of 11.3, 2.7, and 0.7, respectively, and volumes of 30, 150, and 400, respectively. Arrange them in order from smallest to largest mass.
Options:
A. C, B, A
B. B, C, A
C. A, B, C
D. C, A, B
E. None of the above.
output: answer: A

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a laboratory spring scale with a 10N range. Hanging from its hook is the object with the smallest mass from the previous question. The scale's reading must accurately correspond to its weight (use g = 10 N/kg).
output: evaluation_points: 1. The scale has a standard design with clear, legible markings. The maximum range of '10N' is clearly labeled at the appropriate position on the scale face.

2. The pointer's position correctly indicates a force of 2.8 Newtons, corresponding to the weight of the lightest object (object C from Turn 1, with density 0.7 and volume 400).

3. The spring is visibly stretched under the load, indicating it is under tension.

turn: 3
modality: image
input: Change the experimental conditions by submerging the entire apparatus in oil. Generate the new image of the spring scale.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The spring's extension and the pointer's reading must show a decrease compared to the Turn 2 output image, consistent with the buoyant force reducing the apparent weight of the object (object C from Turn 1, with density 0.7 and volume 400).

2. The image must clearly depict the new condition (e.g., by showing the scale and object submerged in a fluid, indicated by a different background or visual cues for oil) as described by 'submerging the entire apparatus in oil'.

3. The main body of the scale and the general background style (colors, basic features) must remain visually consistent with the Turn 2 output image.

4. The image must be clearly recognizable as a modified version of the Turn 2 output image, not a completely new generation.

turn: 4
modality: image
input: Replace the hanging object with a bundle of neatly stacked old newspapers (a mass far exceeding the scale's capacity). Generate the resulting image.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The spring is stretched to its mechanical limit, potentially showing visual distortion or extreme elongation.

2. The pointer is positioned at or beyond the maximum '10N' mark, indicating an overload or 'pegged' condition.

3. Unrelated background elements and the fundamental colors/features of the scale body remain visually consistent with the Turn 2 output image. The image should appear to be a modification of a prior image.

4. The hanging object is clearly depicted as a bundle of papers, distinct from the previous object.
Domain: Physics / mass_measurement

turn: 1
modality: text
input: Three blocks A, B, and C have densities of 1.0 g/cm³, 0.5 g/cm³, and 8.9 g/cm³, and volumes of 150 cm³, 250 cm³, and 20 cm³, respectively. Arrange them in order from smallest to largest mass.
Options:
A. A, B, C
B. B, A, C
C. C, A, B
D. C, B, A
E. None of the above.
output: answer: B

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a laboratory spring scale with a 10N range. Hanging from its hook is the lightest block from the previous question. The scale's reading must accurately correspond to its weight (use g = 10 N/kg).
output: evaluation_points: 1. The scale is generated in a standard style with clear, legible markings. The maximum range of '10N' is clearly labeled at the appropriate position on the scale face.

2. The pointer's position accurately indicates a force of 1.25 Newtons, corresponding to the calculated weight of block B (density 0.5 g/cm³, volume 250 cm³) from Turn 1, which is the lightest block.

3. The spring is visibly stretched from its resting position, indicating it is under load.

turn: 3
modality: image
input: The experimental conditions are changed: cut away half the volume of the suspended block. Generate the new image of the spring scale.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The spring's extension and the pointer's reading have decreased compared to the Turn 2 output image, in accordance with the reduced weight of the block (now half the volume of the original block B).

2. The image clearly shows a visual difference from the Turn 2 output image that corresponds to the described action of 'cutting away half the volume' of the hanging object (e.g., the block is visibly smaller).

3. The main body of the scale and the background environment remain visually consistent with the Turn 2 output image.

4. The image is clearly a modified version of the Turn 2 output image, not a completely new generating.

turn: 4
modality: image
input: Replace the hanging object with a standard household dry powder fire extinguisher (a mass far exceeding the scale's capacity). Generate the resulting image.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The spring is stretched to its mechanical limit, potentially showing signs of deformation or extreme tension.

2. The scale's pointer is pinned at or beyond the maximum '10N' mark, indicating an overload or 'pegged' condition.

3. Irrelevant background elements and the fundamental colors/features of the scale body remain consistent. The image should appear to be a further modification of the previous turn's image.
Domain: Physics / mass_measurement

turn: 1
modality: text
input: Three objects A, B, and C have densities of 7.9, 19.3, and 2.7 respectively, and volumes of 50, 15, and 120 respectively. Please arrange them in order from smallest to largest mass.
Options:
A. A, B, C
B. B, A, C
C. C, A, B
D. C, B, A
E. None of the above.
output: answer: C

turn: 2
modality: image
input: Generate a laboratory spring scale with a range of 10N. Hanging from its hook is the object with the smallest mass from the previous question. The scale's reading must accurately correspond to the object's weight (use g = 10 N/kg).
output: evaluation_points: 1. The spring scale is generated in a standard style with clear, legible markings. The maximum range of '10N' must be clearly labeled in a logical position (e.g., at the top of the scale).

The pointer's position must accurately indicate a force of 2.895 Newtons, which is the calculated weight of object C (density 2.7, volume 120) from Turn 1.

3. The spring must be visibly stretched from its resting position, indicating it is under load.

turn: 3
modality: image
input: Change the experimental conditions as follows: place a strong magnet next to the scale to attract the iron object downward. Please generate the new image of the scale.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The spring's elongation and the direction of the pointer's movement must be consistent with the added downward force from the magnet (i.e., the scale should show a higher reading).

2. The image must clearly depict the new experimental condition, such as including a magnet positioned to attract the object, differentiating it from Turn 2.

3. The basic appearance, color scheme, and background of the spring scale must remain consistent with the image from Turn 2.

The image must be clearly recognizable as a modified version of the Turn 2 output image.

turn: 4
modality: image
input: Replace the hanging object with a small household safe (a mass far exceeding the scale's capacity). Please generate the resulting image.
output: evaluation_points: 1. The spring should be depicted as stretched to its mechanical limit, potentially showing deformation.

2. The pointer must be at or beyond the maximum scale marking (e.g., pinned at 10N or 'off the scale').

3. The irrelevant background and the fundamental colors/features of the spring scale must remain consistent, and the image should appear to be a modification of the previous ones.