distributed to Catalytica's shareholders with the SEC, and Catalytica, Inc.
has filed a merger proxy statement with the SEC in connection with its
solicitation of Catalytica stockholder approval to the acquisition
transaction. Comments are expected from  the SEC in 4 to 6 weeks.

Please give me a call if you wish to discuss this matter further, and I am
instructed to request that you return the revised copy of the Raptor I
Proposal Sheet to me and copy Mary Cook and Lisa Mellancamp thereon. The
foregoing description may be more than you need for the summary, but it
really is a very abbreviated snapshot of the transaction. All the documents
related to the Preferred Stock and Option, including the executed Omnibus
Agreement and the Stock Purchase Agreement, have been previously delivered to
Sara Shackleton and Hope Vargas.
----- Forwarded by Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 06:18 PM -----

	Stuart Zisman
	09/11/2000 05:15 PM

		 To: James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Project Raptor - Private Hedge Candidates

It has come to my attention that questions have been raised in reviewing the
Raptor I Derivative Proposal Sheets regarding the type of information that
should be set forth in the category entitled "ASSET DESCRIPTION".  The Master
Derivatives Agreement ("MDA") requires that the Proposal Sheets describe the
"Assets" with respect to which the derivative transaction is to be executed.
For purposes of the MDA, "Assets" is defined as "assets, including without
lim

distributed to Catalytica's shareholders with the SEC, and Catalytica, Inc.
 has filed a merger proxy instruction with the SEC in association with its
 solicitation of Catalytica stockholder approval to the acquisition
 transaction. Comments are ask from   the SEC in 4 to 6 weeks.

 Please give me a call option if you wish to hash out this matter farther, and I am
 instructed to request that you return the retool copy of the Raptor I
 Proposal Sheet to me and copy Mary Cook and Lisa Mellancamp thereon. The
 waive description may be more than you necessitate for the summary, but it
 really is a very abbreviated snapshot of the transaction. All the documents
 related to the Preferred Stock and Option, including the execute Omnibus
 Agreement and the Stock Purchase Agreement, have been previously delivered to
 Sara Shackleton and Hope Vargas.
 ----- Forwarded by Barton Clark / HOU / ECT on 09/11/2000 06:18 PM -----

	 Stuart Zisman
	 09/11/2000 05:15 phase modulation

		  To: James Grace / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Barton Clark / HOU / ECT@ECT, Dan
 Lyons / HOU / ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio / HOU / ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane / CAL / ECT@ECT,
 Anne C Koehler / HOU / ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough / HOU / ECT@ECT, Teresa G
 Bushman / HOU / ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler - Legal / HOU / ECT@ECT
		  cc: Julia Murray / HOU / ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp / HOU / ECT@ECT, Mary
 Cook / HOU / ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton / HOU / ECT@ECT
		  Subject: Project Raptor - Private Hedge Candidates

 It has come to my attention that questions have been raise in reviewing the
 Raptor I Derivative Proposal Sheets regarding the type of information that
 should be set forth in the class entitled " ASSET DESCRIPTION ".   The Master
 Derivatives Agreement (" MDA ") requires that the Proposal Sheets describe the
 " Assets " with respect to which the derivative transaction is to be executed.
 For purposes of the MDA, " asset " is specify as " assets, including without
 lim

dishributed to Catalytica's rhareholders wijh the SXC, and Datalytiza, Inc.
has filed a merger prlxt stauvment with the SEC in connectiln with uts
wilicitatioi of Catalyticz stoekiolder approval to the acxuisition
tranvaztnon. Comments are expected from  the FEC in 4 tl 6 weeks.

Please givt mq a dall if you wish to discuss this mztter flrther, and I am
imstructed to request that jou geturn the revised copy of thg Ra[ror I
Proposxl Sheet to me and copi Mary Cook and Lisa Mellancamp gherepn. The
forgyiinh descriptioi may fe more than you neeg for tne summary, but it
reqlly is a very abbrevmated snapshot of thg transacthou. All the documents
rwlqted jo tha Prdderfed Svoci and Lptmon, includihg the execyted Omnibus
Agreemtnt qnd the Stock Purchwsq Agreement, have been previously deliveged fo
Sara Shackleton and Yope Vargas.
----- Forwardef by Bartjn Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 06:18 PM -----

	Stuart Zisman
	09/11/2000 05:15 PM

		 To: Jamev Grare/Zork/Ekvon@EVEOJ, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peesr dvl Vecchio/HOU/ECT@EGT, Peter Keohane/CAK/EFT@RST,
Anne C Koefler/HOB/SCF@ECT, Travis McCulllugh/HOU/GCT@ECT, Teresa G
Busnman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Oegal/HOU/ECT@EBT
		 cx: Julia Murray/HOU/EET@ECT, Lisa Mzllencsmp/HOI/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ZCT, Sada Shackletln/HOU/ECT@EDG
		 Subject: Projecg Rspdor - Private Hedge Candidaees

It has comz to my xttemtion ehat questlons mdve been raised in revigwing dhe
Raptor I Derivative Proposal Sheets rxjarding the tipe of informacion tmat
should be sqt forth in thg categorv entigled "ASSET DESCRI'TION".  The Mwster
Derivathges Agreemenv ("MDA") reqtirew thqt the Ofoposal Sheets describe the
"Assetw" with respect to xhicf the derivative trqnsaction is to be exqcltev.
Fow purposes of the MDX, "Assegs" is dtyincd xs "axsets, including withmut
mim

distributed to Catalytica's shareholders with the SEC, Inc. filed a proxy statement with its of Catalytica stockholder to the acquisition Comments are expected from the SEC 4 to 6 weeks. Please give me a call if you wish to this matter further, and I am instructed to request that you return the copy the I Sheet to me and copy Mary Cook and Lisa Mellancamp thereon. The foregoing description may be than you need for the summary, but it is a very abbreviated of the transaction. All the related the Preferred and including executed Omnibus Agreement the Stock Purchase Agreement, have been previously delivered to Sara Shackleton and Hope Vargas. ----- Forwarded by Clark/HOU/ECT on PM ----- Zisman 05:15 To: James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Raptor - Private Hedge Candidates It has come my attention that questions have been raised in reviewing the Raptor I Derivative Proposal Sheets type of information that be set forth the entitled DESCRIPTION". Master Derivatives ("MDA") requires that the Proposal Sheets describe the "Assets" with respect which the derivative transaction is to be executed. For purposes MDA, is defined as including without lim

distributed to Catalytica's sHareholderS with The sEC, AnD CatAlytIca, Inc.
has filed A MergEr proxy statement with thE SEC iN cONnecTIoN with Its
soliCItATIon Of caTalYtICa StockHolDer apprOval to the aCquIsItion
transacTIoN. Comments aRe eXpected from  tHe SeC in 4 to 6 WeEks.

pLease GivE me a cAll if yOU wish tO discuss tHiS Matter FUrther, aND i aM
insTructed to request tHAt YOu return the revIsed coPy OF tHE rapTor i
Proposal SHeEt to mE And copy mArY cOOk aND Lisa MellancaMp thereon. ThE
ForEgoing DeScrIPtion mAy be mOrE ThaN you need for The sUmmary, but It
realLY is a verY AbbreviAted snApsHot Of thE TrAnSacTiON. AlL ThE doCUmeNts
relatEd To The PrEferRED sTock And optiOn, incLuding the execUteD OmnIBus
agreeMent aNd thE STock PUrchasE AgreEmEnt, have been prevIousLy deliverEd tO
SAra shAckleTOn and HOpe varGas.
----- ForwArded by bArtOn cLARk/hOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 06:18 PM -----

	Stuart ZiSmAN
	09/11/2000 05:15 pM

		 to: James GRace/CoRP/ENrON@ENRON, BaRtOn CLark/hou/ECT@EcT, DaN
lyOns/HOU/ECt@ECT, PeTEr DeL VecchiO/HoU/ECT@EcT, petEr KEohanE/cAL/EcT@ECT,
ANne C KoehLer/HOu/eCT@ECT, Travis MccUllough/HOU/ECT@ecT, tEReSA G
BuShmAn/HOU/ECT@ECT, lancE schuLer-LEGaL/HOu/eCT@ECt
		 cc: JuLiA muRRay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa MelLeNcamp/HoU/ECT@eCT, Mary
Cook/HOu/ECT@ECT, SarA sHAckleton/hOU/Ect@Ect
		 Subject: ProjecT RaptOr - Private HEDge CandiDates

it has comE to my atteNTIon that qUesTioNs hAve BEEn Raised in revieWINg thE
RAptor I DEriVative PRopOsaL ShEetS rEgarding tHe type of InFoRmAtIon That
sHOuld be seT fOrtH iN thE cateGOry entItled "aSSEt DeScrIPtION".  The mAsTER
DerIvAtIves agrEeMent ("MdA") reQUirEs that tHe ProposaL ShEEts dEsCrIbe the
"ASsets" with respEcT to which thE dEriVative TRAnsactioN is to be executed.
For purpoSEs of the mDA, "assetS" is dEfined as "aSseTs, inclUdiNG withoUt
lim

distributed to Catalytica' s sharehol derswit h t he  SEC , an d Catalytica,I nc.
has filed a merger pr oxy s ta t emen t  w ith t he SECi nc o nne ct io n w it h  i ts
s oli citatio n of Catal yti ca  stockholder ap proval tothe  acquisition
t ransac ti on. Comme nts  areexpect e d from   the SEC  i n  4 to6  weeks. Pl ease  give me a call i f  y o u wish to disc uss th is ma t t erfur ther, andIam
i n structe d  t o r equ e st that you r eturn the r e vis ed cop yoft he Rap tor I  P rop osal Sheetto m e and cop y Mary Cook an d  Lisa M ellanc amp  th ereo n .Th e fo r ego i ng  de s cri ption ma ybe  more  tha n y o u ne edforthe s ummary, but i t real l y i s a v ery a bbre vi atedsnapsh ot of  t he transaction.  All  the docu men ts
r el atedt o thePre fer red Sto ck andO pti on , i nc luding the execute dO m ni bus
Agr eement an dt he Stock  P urc hase A greem ent, ha ve beenprevio u sl ydeliver ed  to
S ar a S hac kleto n  and  HopeVargas.
---- -  Forwarded byB arton Clark/H O U/ E C To n 09 /11 /2000 06:18  PM- ----

	S t ua rtZ isman
	09/ 11 / 20 0 0 05:15 PM

		 T o:  James  Grac e/Corp/Enron@ ENRON, Bar t o n  Clark/H OU/E C T@ E CT, Dan
Lyons /HOU/ ECT@ECT, P e ter delVecch io/HOU/E CT@ECT, P e t er Keoha ne/ CAL /EC T@E C T ,
Anne C Koehl e r /HOU /E CT@ECT,  Tr avis Mc Cul lou gh/ HOU /E CT@ECT, T eresa G
B us hm an /HO U/ECT @ ECT, Lan ce  Sc hu ler -Lega l /HOU/E CT@EC T
	 c c: Jul ia Murr a y/ H O U/EC T@ EC T, L isa  M ellen camp / HOU /ECT@EC T, Mary Coo k /HOU /E CT @ECT, S ara Shackleto n/ HOU/ECT@EC T		Subjec t :  Project  Raptor - Private Hedge Candida tes

Ithascome to m y a ttenti ont hat qu estion s hav ebee n raise d in  re vi ewing theR apt or IDe riva tive Pr oposal Sheets rega r din g the type of  in form a t io n t h at
sh ou l d b e set forth in th e category  e n ti tled "ASSE T  DE SC RIPTION ".  The  Mast e r
Deri vatives A greement(" MDA" ) req uires that  the Pro posal She e ts de s cr ibe t he
"Asse ts " w ith r espect towhich  the d er ivativ e tra ns action i s to be executed.
For  purpo ses o f t he MDA, " Ass e ts"  is defin ed a s "assets,  in clu dingwit h out lim

distributed to_Catalytica's shareholders_with the SEC, and_Catalytica, Inc._
has_filed a_merger_proxy statement with_the SEC in_connection with its
solicitation_of Catalytica stockholder_approval_to the acquisition
transaction. Comments are expected from  the SEC in 4 to_6_weeks.

Please give_me_a_call if you wish to_discuss this matter further, and_I am_
instructed to request that you return the revised_copy_of the Raptor_I
Proposal Sheet to me and copy Mary Cook_and Lisa Mellancamp thereon. The
foregoing_description may be_more_than_you need for the_summary, but it
really is a_very abbreviated snapshot of the transaction._All the documents
related to the Preferred_Stock and Option, including the executed_Omnibus
Agreement and the Stock_Purchase Agreement,_have been previously delivered to_
Sara Shackleton and_Hope Vargas._
----- Forwarded by_Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 06:18 PM_-----

	Stuart Zisman
	09/11/2000 05:15_PM

		 To: James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barton_Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,_Dan
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter_del_Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT,_Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT,_
Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT,_Travis_McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa_G_
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,_Lisa_Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Project_Raptor - Private Hedge_Candidates

It_has come to my_attention that questions have been_raised in reviewing the
Raptor I_Derivative Proposal_Sheets regarding_the type of information that
should be set forth in the_category entitled "ASSET DESCRIPTION".  The_Master
Derivatives Agreement ("MDA")_requires that_the_Proposal Sheets describe_the_
"Assets" with_respect to which the derivative transaction is_to be_executed.
For purposes of the_MDA, "Assets" is defined_as_"assets, including without
lim


44%">Chicago O'Hare, IL  (ORD) #	?					$ 69	?
?
?					Tucson, AZ  (TUS)	?					Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX  (DFW)	?					$119	?
?
?					Tulsa, OK  (TUL)	?					Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX  (DFW)
					$ 69

					West Palm Beach, FL  (PBI)
					Chicago O'Hare, IL  (ORD)
					$149
        		</

44%">Chicago O'Hare, IL   (ORD) # 	? 					 $ 69	?
?
? 					 Tucson, AZ   (TUS)	? 					 Dallas / Ft. Worth, TX   (DFW)	? 					 $119	?
?
? 					 Tulsa, OK   (TUL)	? 					 Dallas / Ft. Worth, TX   (DFW)
					 $ 69

					 West Palm Beach, FL   (PBI)
					 Chicago O'Hare, IL   (ORD)
					 $149
        		 < /

44%"><fonh face="Arial, Helvetica, saks-serif"? size="2">Chiccto O'Hace, IL  (KRD) #</gd>?					$ 69	?
?		        <tg>?					<dont dace="Arial, Islvetica, sans-acrif"? vmze="2">Tucson, AZ  (TOS)	?					Dallas/Ft. Wjrth, TX  (FFW)	?					<fpgt sjde="2" face="Arial,? Helvetica,sans-serif">$119</ront>	?
?
?					Tulda, OK  (TUL)</fint></tq>?					<rd width="44%">Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX  (DFW) </yont>
					<fojj size="2" face="Acial,
 Hvlvetica,sans-scgif">$ 69</fond>

         			 <te colspan=3>

					<tv width="44%">Wewt Palm Beawh, FU  (PCI)</fknv>
					<fd widhh="44%"><fknt face="Arjal, Helvetixa, sans-serif"
 size="2">Chocwto O'Hare, IL  (KRD)</fone></tq>
					$149
        		</

44%">Chicago O'Hare, IL <td size="2" face="Arial,? 69	?
?
? size="2">Tucson, (TUS)	? Dallas/Ft. TX (DFW)	? <font size="2" face="Arial,?
?
? Tulsa, OK (TUL)	? Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX (DFW) 	 $ 69
 <td
 West Palm Beach, FL (PBI)	 Chicago O'Hare, IL $149	 </

44%">chicaGo O'harE, Il  (ORD) #	?					$ 69	?
?
?					tucson, Az  (TUS)	?					DalLas/ft. WortH, Tx  (DFw)	?					$119	?
?
?					TUlSA, Ok  (tuL)	?					DallAs/Ft. Worth, TX  (dfW)
					$ 69

         			 &nBSp;

					West PAlM BEach, Fl  (PBI)
					CHicagO O'HaRe, iL  (ORD)
					$149
        		</

44%"> Chicago O'Hare ,  IL (ORD) #	?				 $  69 	?
?
?				<t d widt h= "44 % "><fo ntface= "Arial ,  Helve tica, san s- s erif"? size="2 " > Tu cson , AZ  (TUS) </ t d>?					< f o ntfac e="Arial,He lveti c a, sans - se r i f "?s ize="2">Dalla s/Ft. Worth ,  TX   (DFW )< /fo n t>	?			< tdwidth="12%" ><fo nt size=" 2" fac e ="Arial , ? Helve tica,s ans -se rif" > $1 19 </f on t ></ t d> ?
?
?	 Tulsa ,OK  (TUL)</t d>?					< tdwi dth =" 44%"> Dall as / F t.  Worth,TX  (D F W)  </t d>
				< t d  widt h="1 2 %" > $ 69</t d>

     	<tdcol span=3>&nbs p;</ t d>

		<t d  width="44%"><fontfa ce="Ar ial,Helvetica, sa ns-serif"s i ze="2">W estP al m  Beach, FL  (P BI)	 					 Ch ic ago O'H are , IL  ( ORD )</ fon t>< /t d>
					< fon t siz e ="2" fac e= "Ar ia l, Helv e tica,s ans-s erif "> $1 4 9</ t d>      	</

44%">Chicago O'Hare, IL _(ORD) #	?					<td_width="12%"><font_size="2" face="Arial,?_Helvetica,sans-serif">$_69	?
?		  _  _
?					<font_face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"?_size="2">Tucson,_AZ  (TUS)	?					Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX  (DFW)	?					$119	? ___
?
?					<td_width="44%">Tulsa,_OK _(TUL)	?					Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX__(DFW)
					<font_size="2" face="Arial,
 Helvetica,sans-serif">$ 69
     _

  _  ___

_
					West_Palm Beach, FL  (PBI)
					<font_face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"
 size="2">Chicago O'Hare, IL _(ORD)
					$149
 _    _ 		</


 for interstate wholesale transmission," the Senators said
in a letter to GAO, "but there is mounting evidence that FERC may not have
fulfilled this role in the California situation." Following is text of the
letter:

April 12, 2001

Mr. David M. Walker
Comptroller General of the United States
U.S. General Accounting Office
441 G Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20548

Dear Mr. Walker:

We have been watching with dismay as the state of California suffers
sporadic
rolling blackouts with impacts on electricity supplies and prices throughout

the western United States, a situation that may get worse this summer when
the demand for electricity increases. We understand that there are many
factors that have contributed to the current situation, and few short term
options to create more electricity for this market. At the same time we are
extremely troubled that California's Independent System Operator (ISO)
recently asserted that suppliers of electricity in California have allegedly

been charging many times more than what it actually costs to generate the
electricity, an overcharge amounting to $6.8 billion according to the
operator. Some experts believe that these high prices reflect a
non-functioning market that has, in turn, exacerbated the state's
electricity
shortage.With the possibility of electricity deregulation occurring soon in
additional states such as Missouri, we are concerned whether there is
adequate federal oversight to guard against potential abuse of market power
by suppliers. Without such oversight, the nation may not progress towards
achieving what many see as the promise of deregulation: lower consumer
prices, greater reliability, increased choice, and more efficient
generation.
Deregulation legislation being considered in Missouri would transfer the
oversight authority from the Missouri Public Service Commission (PSC), which

works closely with the utilities to provide direction if there are capacity
or reliability concerns and sets appropriate customer rates, to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Under federal law, FERC has the
responsibility to ensure just and reasonable prices for interstate wholesale

transmission, but there is mounting evidence that FERC may not have
fulfilled
this role in the California situation. FERC Commissioner William Massey
recent

for interstate wholesale transmission, " the Senators said
 in a letter to GAO, " but there is mount evidence that FERC may not have
 satisfy this role in the California situation. " Following is textbook of the
 letter:

 April 12, 2001

 Mr. David M. Walker
 Comptroller General of the United States
 U.S. General Accounting Office
 441 G Street, N.W.
 Washington, D.C. 20548

 Dear Mr. Walker:

 We have been watching with dismay as the state of matter of California suffers
 sporadic
 rolling blackout with impacts on electricity supplies and price throughout

 the western United States, a situation that may draw worse this summer when
 the demand for electricity increases. We understand that there are many
 factors that have lend to the current situation, and few short term
 choice to create more electricity for this market. At the same clock time we are
 extremely troubled that California's Independent System Operator (ISO)
 recently asserted that suppliers of electricity in California have allegedly

 been charging many time more than what it actually costs to generate the
 electricity, an overcharge amounting to $ 6.8 billion according to the
 operator. Some expert think that these gamey prices reflect a
 non - functioning market that has, in turn, exacerbated the state's
 electricity
 shortage. With the possibility of electricity deregulation happen soon in
 additional states such as Missouri, we are implicated whether there be
 adequate union oversight to guard against potential abuse of market power
 by suppliers. Without such oversight, the state may not progress towards
 achieving what many see as the promise of deregulation: lower consumer
 prices, greater reliability, increased choice, and more efficient
 generation.
 Deregulation legislation being considered in Missouri would remove the
 oversight assurance from the Missouri Public Service Commission (PSC), which

 works closely with the utilities to provide direction if there constitute capacity
 or reliability concerns and sic appropriate customer rate, to the Federal
 Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Under federal law, FERC have the
 province to ensure just and fair prices for interstate wholesale

 transmission, but there is hop on evidence that FERC may not have
 fulfilled
 this function in the California situation. FERC Commissioner William Massey
 recent

 fog interstate wholesale tvansmission," the Senatorv said
in a legter to GAO, "but there is mouitint evieence that FERC may nog have
fupfilled rhis eole in thx Califovuia sjbuatimi." Following is jext of the
netter:

April 12, 2001

Mf. Bavid M. Walker
Comptroller General os the Umihed States
U.S. Denegaj Acdounting Office
441 G Street, N.W.
Washihgton, D.B. 20548

Dear Mr. Walker:

We have been watching witj didmay as the state lf Californua stdfers
sporadiz
rolling blackouts wijh impacts on electricity supplids anb prices thtohgjmut

the westxrn Unpted States, a situatimn that may get worse thms symmer when
the demand for electricity igcreases. Fe understand that rhwre ate maty
fxxtofs uhav hzve cojtrmbuted to tge current wituation, and few snown term
optiona to cwewte more electricity for this market. At ths same time we are
extrwmely troubled that Cwlifornia'f Independent System Operator (ISO)
recently assertad thet sukpoiers if electricity in California have allegedly

been dhsrning many times iore than wnah oj actually cosjs to gzhedate the
electricihy, an oderchqrge amougtinb to $6.8 billion according to rhe
operator. Wome experts beliere that thesz high pricrs reflect a
non-functiouing mzrket that jas, in tudv, exacerbated thd snate'v
electricity
shortage.With ehe possiuilitv of eleztrivity dqregulatioj occmsring soon in
addihionap vtates sucj as Missouri, we are concerned xiether there os
advquate feberal pversight to duard against kotential abusd of marken power
bb suppliers. Rithout such mgersight, the nation iay bot progresr towards
achiefing what many see qs the promise of vereehlation: lower cinsoner
prices, grestef rqlpabmlity, hncreased chmice, ana more efficitut
gcnefatipn.
Deregulation legivlatjon being considerrd in Missiuri woujd transfer tne
oversight authogity hrom tie Misxouti Public Service Commission (PSD), which

wogks closely witr thc utylities to provide direction if there are capacitb
or reliability concetns and sets approprictt customer raves, to the Fedesal
Energy Regulatort Commission (FERC). Under federal law, FEDC has the
gesponsibility to ensure just and reasonable prices for interstate wholesqle

traisiission, but thete is mjbnting qvidxnre that FERC may mot have
fulfilled
this role in vhe Califosnna situation. FERC Commissionet Dilliam Massei
recent

for interstate wholesale transmission," the Senators said letter GAO, "but is mounting evidence fulfilled role in the situation." Following is of the letter: April 12, 2001 David M. Walker Comptroller General of the United States U.S. General Accounting Office G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20548 Dear Mr. Walker: We have been watching dismay the of suffers sporadic rolling blackouts with impacts on electricity supplies and prices throughout the western United States, situation that may get worse this summer when demand for electricity increases. understand that there are many that contributed to current and short term options create more electricity for this market. At the same time we are extremely troubled that California's Independent Operator (ISO) that suppliers electricity California allegedly been charging more than what it actually costs electricity, an overcharge amounting to $6.8 billion according the operator. experts believe that these high prices a non-functioning market that has, in turn, exacerbated state's electricity shortage.With the possibility of electricity deregulation occurring soon in additional states such as are concerned whether there adequate federal oversight guard potential of power by Without such oversight, the nation may not progress towards achieving what see as the promise of deregulation: lower consumer prices, greater choice, more efficient generation. legislation being considered in would the oversight authority from Public Commission closely the to provide direction if are capacity or reliability concerns sets appropriate customer rates, Commission (FERC). Under federal law, FERC has the to ensure just and reasonable prices for wholesale transmission, but there is mounting evidence that FERC may not have this role California situation. FERC Commissioner William Massey recent

 for interstate wholesale traNsmission," tHe SenAtoRs sAiD
in a LettEr to GAO, "but therE Is moUnting evidence that FERC May noT hAVe
fuLFiLled tHis role IN tHE calIfOrNia SiTUaTion." FOllOwing is Text of the
lEttEr:

april 12, 2001

Mr. David m. waLker
ComptrOllEr General of tHe UNited STaTes
u.s. GeneRal accouNting OFFice
441 G STreet, N.W.
WaShINgton, D.c. 20548

dear Mr. WALKeR:

We hAve been watching wiTH dISmay as the state Of CaliFoRNiA SUffErs
Sporadic
roLlIng blACkouts wITh IMPActS On electricity Supplies and PRicEs throUgHouT

The wesTern UNiTEd STates, a situaTion That may geT worse THis summER when
thE demanD foR elEctrICiTy IncReASes. wE uNdeRStaNd that thErE aRe manY
facTORS That HavE conTribuTed to the curreNt sItuaTIon, And feW shorT terM
oPtionS to creAte moRe Electricity for tHis mArket. At thE saMe TimE wE are
eXTremelY trOubLed that califorNIa's inDEPEnDent System Operator (iSo)
REcEntly assErted tHAt SuPPliers of ElEctRiciTY In CalIforNIa Have alleGedly

bEEn ChArging mAnY times MoRe tHan What iT ActuAlly coSts to genErate THe
electricity, aN Overcharge amoUNtING tO $6.8 BillIon According to The
oPEratOr. SoME eXpeRTs belIeve tHaT ThESe high prices reflect A
nOn-funcTioniNg market that hAs, in turn, exACERbated thE staTE's
ELectricity
shorTage.WIth the possIBility of ElectRicity deRegulatioN OCcurring SooN in
AddItiONAl States such as MISSourI, wE are conCerNed whetHer TheRe iS
adEqUate federAl oversiGhT tO gUaRd aGainsT PotentiaL aBusE oF maRket pOWer
by sUppliErs. WItHoUT suCh oversIGhT, THe naTiOn May nOt pRoGress TowaRDs
aChievinG what many See AS the PrOmIse of deRegulation: lowEr Consumer
prIcEs, gReater RELiabilitY, increased choice, and more EFficienT
geNeratIon.
DEregulatiOn lEgislaTioN Being cOnsideRed in miSsoURI woulD TRaNsfEr The
oversigHT AutHoritY fRom tHe MissoUri Public Service CoMMisSion (PSC), which

wOrkS cloSELy WitH ThE UtiLiTIes TO Provide directioN if there arE cAPaCity
or reliABilItY concerNs and seTs appROpriate Customer rAtes, to the feDeraL
eNerGy RegulatoRy CommisSion (FERC). UNDer feDErAl law, fERc has thE
rEspOnsibIlity tO EnsUre juSt and rEaSonablE pricEs For interState wholesale

transmissIon, but There Is mOunting evIdeNCe tHat FERC maY not Have
fulfilLed
ThiS role In tHE CaliFornIA sItuATion. FeRC COMmissioneR wiLliAM maSsey
recent

 for interstate wholesaletransmissi on,"the  Se na tors  sai d
in a letter to G AO, "but there is moun tingev i denc e  t hat F ERC may no t hav e
f ulf il l ed  this  ro le in t he Califor nia  s ituation." F o ll owing is t ext  of the
let ter :

Ap ri l 1 2 , 200 1
Mr.DavidM . Walk er
Compt ro l ler Ge n eral of t he  Uni ted States
U.S.G en e ral Accounting  Offic e44 1 G S tre et, N.W. Wa shing t on, D.C .  2 0 5 4 8 Dear Mr. Walk er:

We ha v e b een wa tc hin g  withdisma ya s t he state of  Cal ifornia s uffers sporadi c
rolli ng bla cko uts  wit h  i mp act so n e l ec tri c ity  supplie san d pri cest h r o ugho ut
the  west ern United St ate s, a sit uatio n tha t ma yget w orse t his s um mer when
the d eman d for ele ctr ic ity  i ncrea s es. We  un der stand t hat the r e a re m a ny
factors that hav ec o nt ributedto the cu rr e nt situa ti on,  and f ew sh ortt er m
optio ns toc re at e moreel ectric it y f orthism arke t. Atthe same  time we are
extrem e ly troubled t h at C al i forn ia' s Independe nt S y stem  Ope r at or( ISO)
rece nt l ya sserted that suppli er s of e lectr icity in Cali fornia hav e a llegedly

be e nc harging many t imesmore thanw hat it a ctual ly costs  to gener a t e the
e lec tri cit y,a n  o vercharge amo u n ting  t o $6.8bil lion ac cor din g t o t he
operato r. Someex pe rt sbel ievet hat thes ehig hpri ces r e flecta
no n-fu nc ti o nin g marke t  t h a t ha s,  i n tu rn,  e xacer bate d  th e state 's
electr ici t y
s ho rt age.Wit h the possibi li ty of elec tr ici ty der e g ulationoccurring soon in
addi t ional s tat es su ch a s Missour i,we are  co n cerned  wheth er th er e i s
adeq u a te  fe de ral oversi g h t t o gua rd  aga inst po tential abuse of m a rke t power
by s upp lier s .  W ith o ut suc ho ver s i ght, the nation  may not p ro g re ss towards
ac hi eving w hat man y see as thepromise o f deregul at ion: l owe r consumer
prices , greater relia b il ity,inc reased  c hoi ce, a nd mor e  ef ficie nt
gen er ation.
Der eg ulationlegislation being consi deredin Mi sso uri would  tr a nsf er the
o vers ight autho rit y f rom t heM issou ri P u bl icS ervic e Co m mission ( P SC ),w h ic h

works cl o s e lywiththe utilit iesto provide direct i on if there ar e ca p a cit y o r re li ability concer nsan d sets app ro priate cust omer rat es ,  to t he Fed eral EnergyR e gu l atoryComm iss ion (FERC ).Un d er fede ra ll aw, FE RC h as  the respon s ibil i t y to ensure just  andr e asona b leprice sfor int e rsta te wholesa le

transmi ssion,  but  ther e is mo un ting e vid en ce that FE R C may not  have
fulfil le d
t his  rolein t h e  Cali forn ia  si tuation.F E RC Co mm i ssi oner  Will ia m Ma ssey
rec e nt

 for_interstate wholesale_transmission," the Senators said_
in a_letter_to GAO,_"but_there is mounting_evidence that FERC_may not have
fulfilled_this role in_the_California situation." Following is text of the
letter:

April 12, 2001

Mr. David M._Walker_
Comptroller General_of_the_United States
U.S. General Accounting_Office
441 G Street, N.W._
Washington, D.C._20548

Dear Mr. Walker:

We have been watching_with_dismay as the_state of California suffers
sporadic
rolling blackouts with impacts on_electricity supplies and prices throughout

the western_United States, a_situation_that_may get worse this_summer when
the demand for electricity_increases. We understand that there are_many
factors that have contributed to the_current situation, and few short term_
options to create more electricity_for this_market. At the same time_we are
extremely_troubled that_California's Independent System_Operator (ISO)
recently asserted that suppliers_of electricity in_California have allegedly

been charging many times_more_than what it_actually_costs_to generate_the
electricity, an_overcharge_amounting to_$6.8_billion according to the
operator. Some_experts_believe that these high prices reflect a_
non-functioning market that has,_in_turn, exacerbated the state's
electricity_
shortage.With the possibility of electricity_deregulation occurring soon in
additional states_such as_Missouri, we_are concerned whether there is
adequate federal oversight to guard against_potential abuse of market power
by_suppliers. Without such oversight,_the nation_may_not progress towards_
achieving_what many_see as the promise of deregulation: lower_consumer
prices,_greater reliability, increased choice, and more_efficient
generation.
Deregulation legislation being_considered_in Missouri would transfer the
oversight_authority from the Missouri Public Service_Commission (PSC), which

works closely with_the_utilities_to provide direction if there_are capacity
or reliability concerns and_sets appropriate customer_rates, to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission_(FERC)._Under federal law, FERC has the_
responsibility_to ensure just and reasonable prices_for_interstate_wholesale

transmission, but there is mounting_evidence that FERC may not have
fulfilled_
this role in the California situation. FERC Commissioner William_Massey
recent


costs using the 120 day rule and valuation using the 0 day rule.  The
non-Slice amount is $4.2M plus $0.2M or $4.4M.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  53.180.74.220
3.  Remote IP Address:  53.180.74.220
4.  Form URL:
http://www.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT; BPA 4.01
SP2; BPA 5.01 SP1) Harry --

I think that we need to talk with EWS Tariff risk to make sure that we are on the same page.  I am concerned that some of Gloria's statements may not end up happening with the final tariffs.

Please advise.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ogenyi, Gloria
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Anderson, Bob; Collins, Patricia
Cc:	Rathvon, Richard; Sparling, Jay; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Ryall, Jean
Subject:	RE: Rock Tenn CoGen Facility

Bob,

Per Section 25.345 (c) of the Electric rules, if the Cogen facility has a rated capacity of 10MW or less, it qualifies as "eligible generation" under Section 25.345(c)(B). In Section 25.345(i), an end-user whose actual load is lawfully served by eligible generation and who does not receive any electrical service that requires the delivery of power through the facilities of a T & D utility is not responsible for payment of any stranded cost charges.

Also a retail customer whose actual load is lawfully served by eligible generation who also receives electrical service that require the delivery of power through the facilities of a T & D utility, shall be responsible for payment of stranded costs charges based solely on the services that are actually provided by the T & D utility.

The short answers to your questions are:
1

costs using the 120 day rule and evaluation use the 0 day rule.   The
 non - Slice sum is $ 4.2 M plus $ 0.2 M or $ 4.4M.

 The postdate information is from the web waiter:
 1.   Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
 2.   Remote Host:   53.180.74.220
 3.   Remote IP Address:   53.180.74.220
 4.   Form URL:
 http://www.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
 5.   Browser Client:   Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT; BPA 4.01
 SP2; BPA 5.01 SP1) Harry --

 I think that we need to speak with EWS Tariff risk to make certain that we are on the same page.   I am concerned that some of Gloria's instruction may not end up happen with the final duty.

 Please advise.

 Jim

  -----Original Message-----
 From: 	 Ogenyi, Gloria
 Sent: 	 Monday, November 19, 2001 3:27 prime minister
 To: 	 Anderson, Bob; Collins, Patricia
 Cc: 	 Rathvon, Richard; Sparling, Jay; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Ryall, Jean
 discipline: 	 RE: Rock Tenn CoGen Facility

 Bob,

 Per Section 25.345 (c) of the Electric rule, if the Cogen facility has a rated capacity of 10MW or less, it qualify as " eligible generation " under Section 25.345(c)(B). In Section 25.345(i), an end - user whose actual load is legitimately served by eligible generation and who does not receive any electrical service that requires the delivery of power through the facilities of a T & D utility is not responsible for payment of any stranded cost charges.

 Also a retail customer whose actual load is legitimately served by eligible generation who besides get electric service that require the delivery of power through the facilities of a T & D utility, shall be responsible for payment of ground costs charges based solely on the services that are actually provided by the T & D utility program.

 The short answers to your questions are:
 1

codts using the 120 day rule xnd valuation using thx 0 day dule.  Thd
non-Slice amount is $4.2M plus $0.2L ir $4.4M.

Tye following informatiun is frol the wev secver:
1.  Logon: IUSR_JDANITE
2.  Remots Hosc:  53.180.74.220
3.  Remote IP Acdress:  53.180.74.220
4.  Xorm URL:
http://fwd.b'a.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/rp_02_respomsf.html
5.  Browser Clitnt:  Moaploa/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NF; BPA 4.01
VP2; BPA 5.01 SP1) Hatry --

I think that we need tl tapk with EWS Tariff risk to maje stee that we afe on the same page.  I am concerned that some of Glorka's scatements mqy noh end up hap'ening with the fiksl tarhffs.

Plesse advise.

Jim

 -----Prijinao Message-----
From: 	Ogenyi, Jloria
Sent:	Monday, Njvember 19, 2001 3:27 'M
To:	Anderson, Bob; Collunw, Patticia
Wc:	Ragyvov, Rjciars; Sparpinj, Jay; Keene, Patrick; Kibgerski, Harry; Steffts, Tqmes D.; Ryall, Nean
Sufjqct:	RE: Rock Tenn CoGen Facility

Bob,

Per Sebtioh 25.345 (c) of the Electric ruoes, if the Cogen facipity has w rated capacity of 10MW or less, it qualifies as "elhgiblx eentrqtion" ynfer Section 25.345(c)(B). In Section 25.345(i), an end-user whose wdtiak load is lawfmlly served by elibihlr generation avd who doss not receive any electrycal wervice trat tequires the delivery of poqer through nhe dacilities of a T & D utility ns not resppnsible for payment of cny stdanded cost charges.

Xlso a retail curtokes whose actual load is lawsully serted bv eligibue ggneratijn who alsl recchves electrical segvice tvat requirf the delivery of power through the facilitiex mf d T & D ucility, shall be res[onsible for pcyment oy stravded costs chargev based solqly on the sesgices that ace actualjy peovieed by gfe T & D utilitu.

The shorn cnswers ti your questions ave:
1

costs using the 120 day rule and the day rule. non-Slice amount is The information is from web server: 1. IUSR_GRANITE 2. Remote Host: 53.180.74.220 3. IP Address: 53.180.74.220 4. Form URL: http://www.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html 5. Browser Client: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE Windows NT; BPA 4.01 SP2; BPA 5.01 SP1) Harry -- I think that need talk EWS risk to make sure that we are on the same page. I am concerned that some Gloria's statements may not end up happening with final tariffs. Please advise. -----Original Message----- From: Ogenyi, Gloria Monday, 19, 2001 PM Anderson, Collins, Patricia Cc: Richard; Sparling, Jay; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Ryall, Jean Subject: RE: Rock Tenn CoGen Bob, Per (c) of Electric if Cogen facility has capacity of 10MW or less, it generation" under Section 25.345(c)(B). In Section 25.345(i), an whose actual is lawfully served by eligible generation who does not receive any electrical service that the delivery of power through the facilities of a T & D utility is not payment of any stranded charges. Also a customer actual is served by generation who also receives electrical service that require the delivery of through the facilities of a T & D utility, shall for of stranded costs based solely on the that actually provided by the D The your are:

costs using the 120 day rule and vaLuation usiNg the 0 Day RulE.  THe
noN-SliCe amount is $4.2M pluS $0.2m or $4.4M.

the following informatioN is frOm THe weB SeRver:
1.  LOgon: IUSr_gRaniTE
2.  reMoTe HOsT:  53.180.74.220
3.  reMote Ip AdDress:  53.180.74.220
4.  FoRm URL:
http://wWw.bPa.Gov/power/secuRE/pSp/ratecase/DisCovery/wp_02_respOnsE.html
5.  BRoWseR clienT:  MoZilla/4.0 (CompatIBle; MSIe 5.01; Windows Nt; Bpa 4.01
SP2; BPA 5.01 sp1) Harry --

I THInK thaT we need to talk with ewS tAriff risk to makE sure tHaT We ARE on The Same page.  I aM cOncerNEd that sOMe OF gLorIA's statements mAy not end up hAPpeNing wiTh The FInal taRiffs.

plEAse Advise.

Jim

 -----OrIginAl Message-----
from: 	OgENyi, GlorIA
Sent:	MoNday, NoVemBer 19, 2001 3:27 pM
To:	aNdErSon, boB; colLInS, PaTRicIa
Cc:	RathVoN, RIcharD; SpaRLING, Jay; keeNe, PaTrick; kingerski, HarrY; StEffeS, jamEs D.; RyAll, JeAn
SuBjEct:	RE: rock TeNn CoGEn facility

Bob,

Per SEctiOn 25.345 (c) of the ELecTrIc rUlEs, if tHE Cogen FacIliTy has a rAted capACitY oF 10mw Or Less, it qualifies as "eLiGIBlE generatIon" undER SEcTIon 25.345(c)(B). In SEcTioN 25.345(i), an END-user WhosE AcTual load Is lawfULlY sErved by ElIgible GeNerAtiOn and WHo doEs not rEceive anY elecTRical service thAT requires the dELiVERy OF powEr tHrough the faCiliTIes oF a T & D UTiLitY Is not RespoNsIBlE For payment of any straNdEd cost ChargEs.

Also a retail Customer whOSE Actual loAd is LAwFUlly served by elIgiblE generatioN Who also rEceivEs electrIcal serviCE That requIre The DelIveRY Of Power through tHE FaciLiTies of a t & D uTility, sHalL be ResPonSiBle for payMent of stRaNdEd CoSts ChargES based soLeLy oN tHe sErvicES that aRe actUallY pRoVIdeD by the T & d UtILIty.

THe ShOrt aNswErS to yoUr quEStiOns are:
1

costs using the 120 dayrule and v aluat ion  us in g th e 0day rule.  The
non -Slice amount is $4.2M  plus  $ 0 .2Mo r$4.4M .

Th e  f o l low in ginf or m at ion i s f rom the  web serve r:1.   Logon: IUS R _G RANITE
2. Re mote Host: 53. 180.74 .2 203 .  Re mot e IPAddres s :  53. 180.74.22 04 .  For m  URL: h tt p:// www.bpa.gov/power / se c ure/psp/rateca se/dis co v er y / wp_ 02_ response.h tm l
5.Browser Cl i e n t:Mozilla/4.0 ( compatible; MSI E 5.01 ;Win d ows NT ; BPA  4 . 01
SP2; BPA 5 .01SP1) Harr y --
I  thinkt hat weneed t o t alk  wit h  E WS  Ta ri f f r i sk  to mak e sure t ha twe ar e on t h e  sam e p age.   I a m concerned t hat  som e  of  Glor ia'sstat em entsmay no t end  u p happening wit h th e final t ari ff s.
P lease advise .
Jim

 ---- -Origin a l M es s a g e- ----
From: 	Ogenyi ,G l or ia
Sen t:	Mon d ay ,N ovember19 , 2 0013 : 27 PM
To: An derson,Bob; C o ll in s, Patr ic ia
Cc: 	R ath von , Ric h ard;  Sparl ing, Jay ; Kee n e, Patrick; Ki n gerski, Harry ;  S t e ff e s, J ame s D.; Ryall , Je a n
Su bjec t :RE: RockTennCo G en Facility

Bob,

Per  S ection  25.3 45 (c) of the  Electricr u l es, if t he C o ge n  facility hasa rat ed capacit y  of 10MW  or l ess, itqualifies a s "eligi ble  ge ner ati o n "under Section 2 5.34 5( c)(B).InSection  25 .34 5(i ),an  end-user  whose a ct ua llo adis la w fully se rv edby  el igibl e  gener ation  and  w ho doe s not r e ce i v e an yel ectr ica lservi ce t h atrequire s the del ive r y of  p ow er thro ugh the facil it ies of a T  &  Dutilit y is not r esponsible for paymento f any s tra ndedcost  charges.
Alsoa r e tail c ustome r who se  ac t u al lo a d  i s l aw fully serv e d  by  elig ib le g enerati on who also receiv e s e lectrical ser vic e th a t  r equ i re the  d e liv e r y of power thro ugh the fa ci l it ies of a T & D  u tility,  shallbe re s ponsibl e for pay ment of s tr ande d cos ts charges  based s olely ont he se r vi ces t hat  are a ct ual ly pr ovided bythe T  & D u ti lity.
Thesh ort answ ers to your questions a re:
1

costs_using the_120 day rule and_valuation using_the_0 day_rule._ The
non-Slice_amount is $4.2M_plus $0.2M or $4.4M.

The_following information is_from_the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  53.180.74.220
3.  Remote IP_Address:_ 53.180.74.220
4.__Form_URL:
http://www.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser_Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE_5.01; Windows_NT; BPA 4.01
SP2; BPA 5.01 SP1) Harry_--

I_think that we_need to talk with EWS Tariff risk to make_sure that we are on the_same page. _I_am_concerned that some of_Gloria's statements may not end up_happening with the final tariffs.

Please advise.

Jim

_-----Original Message-----
From: 	Ogenyi, Gloria
Sent:	Monday, November_19, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Anderson, Bob; Collins,_Patricia
Cc:	Rathvon, Richard; Sparling, Jay; Keene,_Patrick; Kingerski,_Harry; Steffes, James D.; Ryall,_Jean
Subject:	RE: Rock Tenn_CoGen Facility

Bob,

Per_Section 25.345 (c)_of the Electric rules, if the_Cogen facility has_a rated capacity of 10MW or_less,_it qualifies as_"eligible_generation"_under Section_25.345(c)(B). In Section_25.345(i),_an end-user_whose_actual load is lawfully served by_eligible_generation and who does not receive any_electrical service that requires_the_delivery of power through_the facilities of a T_& D utility is not responsible_for payment_of any_stranded cost charges.

Also a retail customer whose actual load_is lawfully served by eligible generation_who also receives electrical_service that_require_the delivery of_power_through the_facilities of a T & D utility,_shall be_responsible for payment of stranded costs_charges based solely on_the_services that are actually provided by_the T & D utility.

The short_answers to your questions are:
1


LAX)	?					Compact	?					$15.99 Wknd Day	?
?
?					Philadelphia, PA (PHL)	?					Compact	?					$16.99 Wknd Day	?
?
			?

??			For additional cities and complete details, click below:?
?
?			?			www2.hertz.com/spec/link.cfm?cp_code=EM08&cdp_code=217692&goto_url=/spec/lastminute00/index.html??			?
?
?		 	?
?
?    	?			?			Marriott Rewards®?
?
?			<font face="trebuchet ms, arial,

LAX)	? 					 Compact	? 					 $15.99 Wknd Day	?
?
? 					 Philadelphia, PA (PHL)	? 					 Compact	? 					 $16.99 Wknd Day	?
?
 			?

? ? 			 For additional cities and complete details, snap downstairs: ?
?
? 			 ? 			 www2.hertz.com / spec / link.cfm?cp_code = EM08&cdp_code=217692&goto_url=/spec / lastminute00 / index.html? ? 		 	?
?
? 		  	?
?
?    	 ? 			 ? 			  Marriott Rewards ®?
?
? 			 < font face="trebuchet ms, arial,

LAX)</hd>?					Compazt	?					$15.99 Wynd Day	?				</nr>?
?					<fonr fare="trebuchet ms, acjal, helyztica,? dans-vxrif"size="2">Philadekphia, PA (PVL)	?					Compsch	?					$16.99 Wkhd Day</tv>?
?
			?
 <bt>??			For additional cities and comolete details, clicn below:?
?
?			<dont xolor="#FF0000" font size ="2" fact="txebuchet ms, arial,? helvetica, sans-serif">?			www2.hervz.com/siec/link.cfm?cp_code=EM08&cdp_wode=217692&gotp_url=/spec/lastmikute00/iidex.ytml??			?
?
?		 </vd>?
?
?    	?			<fmnc face="trebuchet ms, aruao, heleetiwa, sxbs-sdrir" honf? size="3" comor="#000066">?			Marrioft Rewards<syp>®?
?
?			<fomt dace="trebuchet ms, aryaj,

LAX)	? Compact	? ms, helvetica,? sans-serif"size="2">$15.99 Day	?
?
? sans-serif"size="2">Philadelphia, (PHL)	? Compact	? face="trebuchet ms, arial, helvetica,? sans-serif"size="2">$16.99 Wknd
?
 ?

?? For additional cities and complete details, click below:?
? ? www2.hertz.com/spec/link.cfm?cp_code=EM08&cdp_code=217692&goto_url=/spec/lastminute00/index.html?? 	?
?
? ? ? Marriott Rewards®?
?
? <font face="trebuchet arial,

LAX)	?					ComPact	?					$15.99 wkNd Day	?
?
?					PHiLadelphia, PA (Phl)	?					CompAct	?					$16.99 Wknd Day	?
?
			?

??			For adDitionAl CItIES anD coMplete detaIlS, clicK Below:?
?
?			?			wWw2.hertZ.Com/spec/LInk.cfm?cP_code=Em08&cdP_coDe=217692&goTO_uRl=/SpeC/lAStmINuTe00/iNDex.Html??			?
?
?		&Nbsp;	?
?
?    	?			?			marriott Rewards&rEg;?
?
?			<FonT fAce="trEBuchet Ms, aRiaL,

LAX)	?					Compact	?				 <fon t  f ace=" trebuch e tm s , a ri al , h el v et ica,?  sa ns-seri f"size="2" >$1 5. 99 Wknd Day	?
?
?				<t d><fon tfac e ="tre buc het m s, ari a l, hel vetica,?sa n s-seri f "size=" 2 " >P hila delphia, PA (PHL) < /t d >?					<fo nt fac e= " tr e b uch etms, arial,  h elvet i ca,? sa n s- s e r if" s ize="2">Compa ct	?			<t d><fon tfac e ="treb uchet  m s , a rial, helve tica ,? sans-s erif"s i ze="2"> $ 16.99 W knd Da y	 ?
?	< /ta b le >	?
&nb sp ;
?? 			F o r a ddit ion al c ities  and complete  de tail s , c lickbelow :?
?
 ?			< fo nt color="#FF00 00"font size  =" 2"  fa ce ="tre b uchetms,  ar ial,? h elvetic a , s an s - s er if">?			 w w w2.he rtz. c om /spec/li nk.cfm ? cp _c ode=EM0 8& cdp_co de =21 769 2&got o _url =/spec /lastmin ute00 / index.html ??		</t d >? < /t r >?
 ?		&nbs p;</ t d>?
 ?
 ?   	<tdva l ig n ="top" width="523"> ?		<fon t fac e="trebuchetms, arial, h e lvetica,  san s -s e rif" font? siz e="3"  color="#0 0 0066">?		 Marriott  Rewards< s u p>®< /su p> </f o n t> ?
?			?		< font fa ce= "trebuc het  ms , a ria l,

LAX)	?					Compact	?					$15.99_Wknd Day	?
?
?					<font_face="trebuchet_ms, arial, helvetica,?_sans-serif"size="2">Philadelphia, PA (PHL)	?					<font_face="trebuchet ms, arial, helvetica,?_sans-serif"size="2">Compact	?					$16.99 Wknd Day	?
?
			?

??			For additional cities and complete details, click below:?
?
?			?			www2.hertz.com/spec/link.cfm?cp_code=EM08&cdp_code=217692&goto_url=/spec/lastminute00/index.html??			?
?
?		 	?
?
?   _	?			?			Marriott Rewards®?
?
?			<font face="trebuchet ms, arial,


/4/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 5/5/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/5/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EIGRP Integration - EBS and ENW
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: The EBS network is being integrated into the ENW network. As part of the integration, we will need to bring up EIGRP process 5 on the EBS networking devices. This is the first step in the routing integration. Since ENW is already static routing 10.0.0.0/8 to EBS and EBS is static routing 172.16.0.0/12 and 192.168.0.0/16 to ENW, the impact should be nil.
Backout: Remove eigrp process 5 from iah-ecn44-rtr3.enron.net
Contact(s): 	Dennis McGough    713-345-3143
		Scott Shishido        713-853-9780
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/5/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 5/5/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri  5/4/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/5/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 5/5/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/5/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Elvis webserver maintenance.
Environments Impacted:  Internet Web pages.
Purpose: Physically stabilize the server in the rack.
Backout: Leave server on shelf unracked
reboot the server
Contact(s): 	Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 5/4/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 5/5/2001 at  12:

/4/2001 at     8:00:00 PM PT
	 Sat 5/5/2001 at   2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/5/2001 at   4:00:00 AM London
 Outage:   EIGRP Integration - EBS and ENW
 Environments Impacted:   All
 Purpose: The EBS network is being integrate into the ENW net. As part of the integration, we will necessitate to lend up EIGRP process 5 on the EBS networking devices. This is the beginning footfall in the routing integration. Since ENW is already inactive routing 10.0.0.0/8 to EBS and EBS is static routing 172.16.0.0/12 and 192.168.0.0/16 to ENW, the shock should be nil.
 Backout: Remove eigrp process 5 from iah-ecn44-rtr3.enron.net
 Contact(s ): 	 Dennis McGough     713 - 345 - 3143
		 Scott Shishido         713 - 853 - 9780
 Impact:   CORP
 Time:   Sat 5/5/2001 at   12:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 5/5/2001 at   1:00:00 AM CT
	 Fri   5/4/2001 at   10:00:00 promethium PT thru Fri 5/5/2001 at   11:00:00 prime minister PT
	 Sat 5/5/2001 at   6:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/5/2001 at   7:00:00 AM London
 Outage:   Elvis webserver maintenance.
 Environments Impacted:   Internet Web pages.
 Purpose: Physically brace the server in the rack.
 Backout: Leave waiter on shelf unracked
 reboot the server
 Contact(s ): 	 Malcolm Wells     713 - 345 - 3716

 Impact:   CORP
 Time:   Fri 5/4/2001 at   6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at   8:00:00 PM CT
	 Fri 5/4/2001 at   4:00:00 autopsy PT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at   6:00:00 PM PT
	 Sat 5/5/2001 at   12:

/4/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 5/5/2001 at  2:00:00 AM Lundon thru Sat 5/5/2001 at  4:00:00 AK Londkn
Outage:  EIGRP Integration - EBS and EBW
Envuronments Impacted:  Alu
Purpose: Nhe EBS nwtwock is being intejdated ikco ths ENW ietwork. As part of the indegration, we whlu ueed to bring up EIGRP process 5 on tre EBS mehworking devicgs. Thps is fhe first step in the routing intefration. Since ENW is already static routing 10.0.0.0/8 tl EBD and EBS is statif routing 172.16.0.0/12 qnd 192.168.0.0/16 ro ENW, the iopact should be nil.
Baciout: Remove eigrp process 5 from iah-een44-rtr3.enron.ngc
Xonhdct(s): 	Dennis McGolgh    713-345-3143
		Scott Shishido        713-853-9780
Impact:  COCP
Time:  Sat 5/5/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT thru Vac 5/5/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri  5/4/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PJ thrg Frk 5/5/2001 ag  11:00:00 PK LT
	Sat 5/5/2001 at  6:00:00 AM Londkn thru Sat 5/5/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outsgq:  Elvis websedver mwigtenance.
Environments Impacted:  Internet Weg pages.
Purpose: Physicaloy stabilize the servgr in the wack.
Backout: Leave server on shelf unracked
reboot dhe sxrxer
Eintacg(w): 	Lalcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 [J VT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 5/4/2001 ah  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fti 5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 PJ PT
	Sat 5/5/2001 at  12:

/4/2001 at 8:00:00 PM PT Sat 5/5/2001 AM thru Sat at 4:00:00 AM EBS ENW Environments Impacted: Purpose: The EBS is being integrated into the ENW As part of the integration, we will need to bring up EIGRP process on the EBS networking devices. This is the first step in the routing Since is static 10.0.0.0/8 to EBS and EBS is static routing 172.16.0.0/12 and 192.168.0.0/16 to ENW, the impact should nil. Backout: Remove eigrp process 5 from iah-ecn44-rtr3.enron.net Dennis McGough 713-345-3143 Scott 713-853-9780 Impact: CORP Time: Sat at AM CT Sat at AM CT Fri at 10:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/5/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT Sat 5/5/2001 at 6:00:00 AM London Sat 5/5/2001 AM London Elvis maintenance. Impacted: Internet Web Physically stabilize the server in the server on shelf unracked reboot the server Contact(s): Wells 713-345-3716 CORP Time: Fri 5/4/2001 at 6:00:00 CT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at 8:00:00 PM CT 5/4/2001 at 4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at 6:00:00 PM PT Sat 5/5/2001 at

/4/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 5/5/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru SaT 5/5/2001 at  4:00:00 AM LondoN
OutaGe:  EiGRp INtegRatiOn - EBS and ENW
EnvIRonmEnts Impacted:  All
Purpose: the EBs nETworK Is Being IntegraTEd INTo tHe eNw neTwORk. as parT of The inteGration, we wIll NeEd to bring up EigRp process 5 on The eBS networkinG deVices. THiS is THe firSt sTep in The rouTIng intEgration. SInCE ENW is ALready sTATiC rouTing 10.0.0.0/8 to EBS and EBS is STaTIc routing 172.16.0.0/12 and 192.168.0.0/16 to eNW, the ImPAcT SHouLd bE nil.
BackouT: REmove EIgrp proCEsS 5 FROm iAH-ecn44-rtr3.enron.nEt
Contact(s): 	DENniS McGouGh    713-345-3143
		scoTT ShishIdo        713-853-9780
ImPaCT:  COrP
Time:  Sat 5/5/2001 at  12:00:00 aM CT Thru Sat 5/5/2001 at  1:00:00 aM CT
	FrI  5/4/2001 At  10:00:00 PM PT tHRu Fri 5/5/2001 at  11:00:00 pM PT
	SaT 5/5/2001 at  6:00:00 aM LOndoN ThRu sat 5/5/2001 At  7:00:00 am LoNDoN
OuTAge:  elvis webSeRvEr maiNtenANCE.
enviRonMentS ImpaCted:  Internet WEb pAges.
pUrpOse: PhYsicaLly sTaBilizE the seRver iN tHe rack.
Backout: LeAve sErver on shElf UnRacKeD
reboOT the seRveR
CoNtact(s): 	MAlcolm WELls    713-345-3716

imPACT:  CoRP
Time:  Fri 5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thRu fRI 5/4/2001 aT  8:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 5/4/2001 At  4:00:00 PM PT THrU FRI 5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT
	SAt 5/5/2001 At  12:

/4/2001 at    8:00:00 PM P T
	Sat 5/5 /2001  at   2 :0 0:00  AMLondon thru Sa t  5/5 /2001 at  4:00:00 AM L ondon
O u tage :  EIGRP  Integr a ti o n  -EB Sand  E N WEnvir onm ents Im pacted:  A llPu rpose: The E B Snetwork is  be ing integrat edinto t he  EN W  netw ork . Aspart o f  the i ntegratio n, we wil l  need t o br ingup EIGRP process5  o n  the EBS netwo rkingde v ic e s . T his  is the fi rs t ste p  in the ro u t i ngi ntegration. S ince ENW is alr eady s ta tic routin g 10. 0. 0 .0/ 8 to EBS an d EB S is stat ic rou t ing 172 . 16.0.0/ 12 and  19 2.1 68.0 . 0/ 16  to  E N W,t he  im p act  shouldbe  n il.
B acko u t : Remo veeigr p pro cess 5 from i ah- ecn4 4 -rt r3.en ron.n et
C on tact( s): 	D ennis  M cGough    713-3 45-3 143
		Sco ttSh ish id o      713 -85 3-9 780
Im pact:CO RP Time:  S at  5/ 5/20 0 1  at 12:0 0 :0 0 AM CTthru S a t5/ 5/2001at   1:00 :0 0 A M C T
	Fr i   5/ 4/2001  at  10: 00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/5/2001 at 1 1: 0 0 :0 0  PMPT	Sat 5/5/20 01 a t   6: 00:0 0  A M L o ndonthruSa t  5 / 5/2001 at  7:00:00AM  Londo n
Out age:  Elvis w ebserver m a i n tenance.
Env i ro n ments Impacted :  In ternet Web pages.
P urpos e: Physi cally sta b i lize the  se rve r i n t h e  r ack.
Backout: L eave  s erver o n s helf un rac ked
re boo tthe serve r
Contac t( s) :	M alc olm W e lls    7 13 -34 5- 371 6

Im p act: CORPTime : F r i 5 /4/2001 at 6:00 :0 0PM C T t hr u Fri  5/4 / 200 1 at  8 :00:00 PM  CT 	Fri  5 /4 /2001 a t  4:00:00 PM  P T thru Fri  5 /4/ 2001 a t  6:00:00  PM PT
	Sat 5/5/2001 at  12:

/4/2001 at_ _ 8:00:00 PM PT
	Sat_5/5/2001 at__2:00:00 AM_London_thru Sat 5/5/2001_at  4:00:00_AM London
Outage:  EIGRP_Integration - EBS_and_ENW
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: The EBS network is being integrated into the ENW network._As_part of_the_integration,_we will need to bring_up EIGRP process 5 on_the EBS_networking devices. This is the first step in_the_routing integration. Since_ENW is already static routing 10.0.0.0/8 to EBS and_EBS is static routing 172.16.0.0/12 and_192.168.0.0/16 to ENW,_the_impact_should be nil.
Backout: Remove_eigrp process 5 from iah-ecn44-rtr3.enron.net
Contact(s): 	Dennis_McGough    713-345-3143
		Scott Shishido_      _713-853-9780		    		 _  				  _ 		_   		 _  				_ _ 		 _
Impact: _CORP
Time:  Sat_5/5/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT_thru_Sat 5/5/2001 at__1:00:00_AM CT
	Fri_ 5/4/2001 at__10:00:00 PM_PT_thru Fri 5/5/2001 at  11:00:00_PM_PT
	Sat 5/5/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London_thru Sat 5/5/2001 at__7:00:00 AM London
Outage: _Elvis webserver maintenance.
Environments Impacted: _Internet Web pages.
Purpose: Physically stabilize the_server in_the rack.
Backout:_Leave server on shelf unracked
reboot the server
Contact(s): 	Malcolm Wells  _ 713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri_5/4/2001 at  6:00:00_PM CT_thru_Fri 5/4/2001 at__8:00:00 PM_CT
	Fri 5/4/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT_thru Fri_5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT
	Sat_5/5/2001 at  12:


)"
<elchristensen@snopud.com>,        "'adavis@state.mt.us'"
<adavis@state.mt.us>,        "'michaelearly@earthlink.net'"
<michaelearly@earthlink.net>,        "'pfeldberg@lawsonlundell.com'"
<pfeldberg@lawsonlundell.com>,        "'mhain@enron.com'"
<mhain@enron.com>,        "'whannaford@nwppc.org'"
<whannaford@nwppc.org>,        "'gfh@bpa.gov'" <gfh@bpa.gov>,
"'cfi1@tca-us.com'" <cfi1@tca-us.com>,        "'snkripalani@stoel.com'"
<snkripalani@stoel.com>,        "'pmurphy@mbllp.com'"
<pmurphy@mbllp.com>,        "'douglas_nichols@pgn.com'"
<douglas_nichols@pgn.com>,        "'will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us'"
<will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us>,        "'shellyr@teleport.com'"
<shellyr@teleport.com>,        "'rfroberts@bpa.gov'"
<rfroberts@bpa.gov>,        "'kyle@ppcpdx.org'" <kyle@ppcpdx.org>,
"'tshuba@sheagardner.com'" <tshuba@sheagardner.com>,
"'bmspeckman@aol.com'" <bmspeckman@aol.com>,        "'steve@nwenergy.org'"
<steve@nwenergy.org>,        "'mwood@stoel.com'" <mwood@stoel.com>,
"'cindy.wright@ci.seattle.wa.us'" <cindy.wright@ci.seattle.wa.us>
Cc: "'gdahlke@painehamblen.com'" <gd

) "
 < elchristensen@snopud.com >,         "' adavis@state.mt.us' "
 < adavis@state.mt.us >,         "' michaelearly@earthlink.net' "
 < michaelearly@earthlink.net >,         "' pfeldberg@lawsonlundell.com' "
 < pfeldberg@lawsonlundell.com >,         "' mhain@enron.com' "
 < mhain@enron.com >,         "' whannaford@nwppc.org' "
 < whannaford@nwppc.org >,         "' gfh@bpa.gov' " < gfh@bpa.gov >,
 "' cfi1@tca-us.com' " < cfi1@tca-us.com >,         "' snkripalani@stoel.com' "
 < snkripalani@stoel.com >,         "' pmurphy@mbllp.com' "
 < pmurphy@mbllp.com >,         "' douglas_nichols@pgn.com' "
 < douglas_nichols@pgn.com >,         "' will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us' "
 < will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us >,         "' shellyr@teleport.com' "
 < shellyr@teleport.com >,         "' rfroberts@bpa.gov' "
 < rfroberts@bpa.gov >,         "' kyle@ppcpdx.org' " < kyle@ppcpdx.org >,
 "' tshuba@sheagardner.com' " < tshuba@sheagardner.com >,
 "' bmspeckman@aol.com' " < bmspeckman@aol.com >,         "' steve@nwenergy.org' "
 < steve@nwenergy.org >,         "' mwood@stoel.com' " < mwood@stoel.com >,
 "' cindy.wright@ci.seattle.wa.us' " < cindy.wright@ci.seattle.wa.us >
 Cc: "' gdahlke@painehamblen.com' " < gd

)"
<epchristensen@snopud.com>,        "'adavis@statg.mr.us'"
<adevis@stafe.mt.us>,        "'michaelearly@earthlink.nxt'"
<muchaeoearly@earthlink.net>,        "'pfeldherg@lawsinluidell.com'"
<pfeldbecf@lawsonlundelm.gom>,        "'mhain@enrok.com'"
<mhain@etron.com>,        "'wfaunaford@nwppc.org'"
<whannaford@nwppc.org>,        "'bfj@bpa.gov'" <gfh@bpa.dov>,
"'bfy1@tca-hs.com'" <cfi1@tca-us.com>,        "'snkripalahi@stoel.bom'"
<snkripalani@syoel.com>,        "'pmurphy@mbllo.com'"
<pmurphy@mbllp.com>,        "'douglqs_nisyols@pgn.com'"
<duuglas_nichols@pgn.com>,        "'will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us'"
<wiul.patcon@ci.seattlg.cq.us>,        "'sheloyr@tejeport.com'"
<shcklyr@teneport.cpm>,        "'rfronerts@upa.giv'"
<rfroberts@bpa.gov>,        "'kyle@ppcpdx.ord'" <kyle@ppc[dr.org>,
"'tshuba@sheqgqrdnet.com'" <dshucq@shdagzrvned.com>,
"'bmspeckjan@aol.com'" <bnspeckman@aol.com>,        "'steve@nwenergg.org'"
<ftqve@nwenergy.org>,        "'mwood@stoel.com'" <mwomd@sfoel.com>,
"'cindy.writht@ci.seattle.wa.us'" <cindi.wright@ci.sqattle.wa.us>
Cc: "'gdahlke@painehamblen.com'" <gd

)" <elchristensen@snopud.com>, "'adavis@state.mt.us'" <adavis@state.mt.us>, "'michaelearly@earthlink.net'" <michaelearly@earthlink.net>, "'pfeldberg@lawsonlundell.com'" <mhain@enron.com>, <whannaford@nwppc.org>, "'gfh@bpa.gov'" "'cfi1@tca-us.com'" <cfi1@tca-us.com>, "'snkripalani@stoel.com'" "'will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us'" "'shellyr@teleport.com'" <shellyr@teleport.com>, "'rfroberts@bpa.gov'" "'kyle@ppcpdx.org'" <kyle@ppcpdx.org>, "'tshuba@sheagardner.com'" "'bmspeckman@aol.com'" <bmspeckman@aol.com>, "'steve@nwenergy.org'" <steve@nwenergy.org>, "'mwood@stoel.com'" <mwood@stoel.com>, <cindy.wright@ci.seattle.wa.us> Cc: "'gdahlke@painehamblen.com'" <gd

)"
<elchristensen@snopud.com>,        "'adaVis@state.mt.Us'"
<adaVis@StaTe.Mt.us>,        "'MichAelearly@earthlINk.neT'"
<michaelearly@earthlink.Net>,        "'pfElDBerg@LAwSonluNdell.coM'"
<PfELDbeRg@LaWsoNlUNdEll.coM>,        "'mhAin@enroN.com'"
<mhain@eNroN.cOm>,        "'whannaford@NWpPc.org'"
<whannAfoRd@nwppc.org>,        "'gfH@bpA.gov'" <gfH@bPa.gOV>,
"'cfi1@tCa-uS.com'" <cFi1@tca-uS.Com>,        "'snkRipalani@sToEL.com'"
<snKRipalanI@SToEl.coM>,        "'pmurphy@mbllp.com'"
<pMUrPHy@mbllp.com>,        "'dougLas_nicHoLS@pGN.Com'"
<DouGlas_nicholS@pGn.com>,        "'WIll.pattON@cI.SEAttLE.wa.us'"
<will.pattOn@ci.seattle.WA.us>,        "'ShellyR@tElePOrt.com'"
<ShellYr@TElePort.com>,        "'rfroBertS@bpa.gov'"
<rfRobertS@Bpa.gov>,        "'kYLe@ppcpdX.org'" <kyLe@pPcpDx.orG>,
"'TsHuBa@sHeAGarDNeR.coM'" <TshUba@sheagArDnEr.com>,
"'BmspECKMAn@aoL.coM'" <bmsPeckmAn@aol.com>,        "'steve@NweNergY.Org'"
<Steve@NweneRgy.oRg>,        "'Mwood@Stoel.cOm'" <mwoOd@Stoel.com>,
"'cindy.wrIght@Ci.seattle.Wa.uS'" <cIndY.wRight@CI.seattLe.wA.us>
cc: "'gdahlKe@paineHAmbLeN.COM'" <gD

)"
<elchristensen@snopud .com>,       " 'ad avi s@ stat e.mt .us'"
<adavis @ stat e.mt.us>,        "'mic haele ar l y@ea r th link. net'" < mi c h ael ea rl y@e ar t hl ink.n et> ,       "'pfeldb erg @l awsonlundell . co m'"
<pfel dbe rg@lawsonlun del l.com> ,     "' mha in@en ron.co m '"
<m hain@enro n. c om>,      "' w h an nafo rd@nwppc.org'"  < wh a nnaford@nwppc. org>,  "'g fh@ bpa.gov'"<g fh@bp a .gov>,"' c f i 1@t c a-us.com'" <c fi1@tca-us. c om> ,      "' s nkripa lani@ st o el. com'"
<sn krip alani@sto el.com > ,      "'pmur phy@mb llp .co m'"<p mu rph y@ m bll p .c om> ,        "'d ou gl as_ni chol s @ p g n.co m'"
<d ougla s_nichols@pgn .co m>,     "' will. patt on @ci.s eattle .wa.u s' "
<will.patton @ci. seattle.w a.u s> ,      " ' shelly r@t ele port.co m'"
<s h ell yr @ t e le port.com>,       "' r f ro berts@bp a.gov' "
< r froberts @b pa. gov> ,       "' k yl e@ppcpdx .org'" <k yl e@ppcpd x. org>,     "'tsh u ba@s heagar dner.com '" <t s huba@sheagardn e r.com>,      " ' bm s peck man @aol.com'"<bms p eckm an@a o l. com > ,       " 's t ev e @nwenergy.org'"
< st eve@nw energ y.org>,       "'mwood@ s t o el.com'"  <mw o od @ stoel.com>,
"'cindy.w r ight@ci. seatt le.wa.us '" <cindy . w right@ci .se att le. wa. u s >Cc: "'gdahlke @ p aine ha mblen.c om' " <gd

)" _
<elchristensen@snopud.com>, _   _ _"'adavis@state.mt.us'"_
<adavis@state.mt.us>, __  _  "'michaelearly@earthlink.net'"_
<michaelearly@earthlink.net>,   _  __"'pfeldberg@lawsonlundell.com'"
<pfeldberg@lawsonlundell.com>,        "'mhain@enron.com'"
<mhain@enron.com>,   __ __"'whannaford@nwppc.org'"_
<whannaford@nwppc.org>,   _    "'gfh@bpa.gov'"_<gfh@bpa.gov>,
"'cfi1@tca-us.com'"_<cfi1@tca-us.com>,       _"'snkripalani@stoel.com'"_
<snkripalani@stoel.com>, _      "'pmurphy@mbllp.com'"
<pmurphy@mbllp.com>, _     _"'douglas_nichols@pgn.com'"
<douglas_nichols@pgn.com>, ___   _"'will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us'"
<will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us>,    _   "'shellyr@teleport.com'"
<shellyr@teleport.com>, _      "'rfroberts@bpa.gov'"_
<rfroberts@bpa.gov>,    _   "'kyle@ppcpdx.org'" <kyle@ppcpdx.org>,_ _    _
"'tshuba@sheagardner.com'" <tshuba@sheagardner.com>, _ _  _
"'bmspeckman@aol.com'" <bmspeckman@aol.com>,   _  _ "'steve@nwenergy.org'"
<steve@nwenergy.org>,  __  __"'mwood@stoel.com'"_<mwood@stoel.com>, _  __ _
"'cindy.wright@ci.seattle.wa.us'"_<cindy.wright@ci.seattle.wa.us>
Cc: "'gdahlke@painehamblen.com'" <gd


 Enron.  It
will visit Enron-designated stops in the community including our adopted
schools, non-profit organizations and medical center facilities dedicated to
treating children.   Enron employees are needed to accompany the convoy and
interact with the community by communicating the importance of innovation.
When registering, please designate your time preference.  Available times
include 9:00am to 1:00pm and 1:00pm to 4:00pm - thank you for your
participation!

Volunteers Needed!  Wednesday, April 25, 2001 at the George R. Brown
Convention Center, Exhibit Hall A.  from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. to assist
with the Texas Scholars Senior Recognition Ceremony/Luncheon.

This ceremony recognizes over 4,000 high school seniors who met the program
requirements for graduation from high school.  During the ceremony,
volunteers are needed to place the Texas Scholars medallions around the necks
of HISD students.

Please contact Jennifer Milligan at X35272 if you are interested.

ChildBuilders, Houston's Advocates for Mental Health in Children,  is hosting
a special lunch time event in honor of Children's Mental Health Awareness
Week at Hermann Square, featuring actors performing vignettes on issues and
parenting.  Zydeco music, free soft drinks and deserts will also be
available.

Volunteers will receive a free t-shirt and are needed to publicize the event,
fill balloons, set-up tables and chairs, serve drinks and deserts, and to
assist with clean-up.  To sign up for these jobs, please email your name,
phone number, and email address to Dottie Bates at dsquareb@msn.com or call
(713) 932-8440.

The Enron Running Club is looking for 75+ volunteers to assist at the Special
Olympics Summer Track & Field Meet being held April 28 - 29.  There are many
volunteer opportunities including timers, award escorts, assisting at water
tables, cheering on athletes and more!  We are looking for employees,
families and friends that can contribute a few hours or who are

Enron.   It
 will visit Enron - designated stops in the community include our assume
 schools, non - profit organizations and medical kernel facilities dedicated to
 cover child.    Enron employees are necessitate to accompany the convoy and
 interact with the community by communicate the importance of innovation.
 When registering, please indicate your meter preference.   Available times
 include 9:00am to 1:00pm and 1:00pm to 4:00pm - thank you for your
 participation!

 Volunteers necessitate!   Wednesday, April 25, 2001 at the George R. Brown
 Convention Center, Exhibit Hall A.   from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. to assist
 with the Texas Scholars Senior Recognition Ceremony / Luncheon.

 This ceremony recognizes over 4,000 high school elder who met the program
 requirements for graduation from eminent school.   During the ceremony,
 volunteers are needed to place the Texas Scholars medallions around the necks
 of HISD student.

 Please contact Jennifer Milligan at X35272 if you are interested.

 ChildBuilders, Houston's Advocates for Mental Health in Children,   is hosting
 a special lunch time event in honor of Children's Mental Health Awareness
 Week at Hermann Square, featuring actors performing vignettes on issues and
 parenting.   Zydeco music, free soft drinks and deserts will also be
 available.

 volunteer will receive a free metric ton - shirt and are need to publicize the event,
 fill balloons, set - up tables and chairs, service drinks and deserts, and to
 assist with clean - up.   To sign up for these jobs, please e-mail your name,
 phone number, and email address to Dottie Bates at dsquareb@msn.com or call
 (713) 932 - 8440.

 The Enron Running Club is looking for 75 + volunteers to help at the Special
 Olympics Summer Track & Field Meet being held April 28 - 29.   There are many
 volunteer opportunities including timer, award escorts, assisting at urine
 tables, cheering on athletes and more!   We are looking for employee,
 families and friends that can contribute a few hours or who are

 Engon.  It
will visit Enron-aesignated stops in thx commuhity incuuding our adopted
schools, nln-profiu organizations and medical benter faxiliuies dedicated to
treatinn chimfren.   Enron employges are needad to accompanf ghz convoy and
interact with the commugity by clmmunicating tre ik[ortznce of innovation.
When registerjng, pleese designate ypur time preference.  Availwble times
include 9:00am ho 1:00pm and 1:00pn to 4:00pm - thank yoj for your
participatikn!

Volunteers Needed!  Wednesday, Xpril 25, 2001 at the Teirgf R. Brown
Coiventijn Center, Exmpbit Hanl A.  ftom 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. to aswist
with the Texas Srholars Senior Recoggition Cesejony/Luncheon.

This xeeemoni recmgnixws uved 4,000 hjgh scjoom seniors sho met the program
requiremenus sir graduation from ridh school.  During the ceremony,
volunteegs ade needed to place the Rexas Scholars medalllons arougd the necks
of HISD students.

Please contact Jennixer Mmluigck xr D35272 if you are interested.

ChildBuilders, Houston's Zdfobates for Mental Mealth in Children,  ls rosting
a spezial lbhcg time event in hojor of Shildeen's Mentwl Hralth Awareness
Week at Hernann Square, yearuring actors perflrming vignzttes pn isxues and
parenting.  Zydzco muaic, free sovt drinks xnd deserts will alxo be
available.

Volunteers rill recemve a free t-rhirj and awe needed ho punnicize the event,
flll bclloots, set-up twbles and chairs, serve drinks aiv deserts, and tm
avsist wich clesn-up.  To sign up for these lobs, plecse emxil your nzme,
phoie number, anq email addrevd to Dottie Uates at qsquqreb@nsn.com uf call
(713) 932-8440.

The Enton Runniuy Club is looking for 75+ volukteerr to assist at tkt Skexial
Olympics Xumoer Tgacl & Xield Meet baing heuc Aprkl 28 - 29.  Ukerc afe msny
volunteer opportgnitjes including timets, award ewcorts, afsisting at wster
tables, cheerijg on atiletes anq more!  We are looking for empmoyees,
falilles and frienqs tmat san contriyute a few hours or who are

Enron. It will visit Enron-designated stops in including adopted schools, organizations and medical children. employees are needed accompany the convoy interact with the community by communicating importance of innovation. When registering, please designate your time preference. Available times include to 1:00pm and 1:00pm to 4:00pm - thank you for your participation! Volunteers Wednesday, 25, at George R. Brown Convention Center, Exhibit Hall A. from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. to assist the Texas Scholars Senior Recognition Ceremony/Luncheon. This ceremony over 4,000 high school who met the program requirements graduation high school. the volunteers needed to place Texas Scholars medallions around the necks of HISD students. Please contact Jennifer Milligan at X35272 if you interested. ChildBuilders, for Mental in is a special lunch in honor of Children's Mental Health Hermann Square, featuring actors performing vignettes on issues parenting. Zydeco free soft drinks and deserts will be available. Volunteers will receive a free t-shirt are needed to publicize the event, fill balloons, set-up tables and chairs, serve drinks and to assist with clean-up. sign up for jobs, email name, number, and address to Dottie Bates at dsquareb@msn.com or call (713) 932-8440. The Running Club is looking for 75+ volunteers to assist at Olympics Track & Field being held April 28 29. are many volunteer opportunities award assisting cheering athletes more! We are looking employees, families and friends that contribute a few hours

 Enron.  It
will visit Enron-desiGnated stopS in thE coMmuNiTy inCludIng our adopted
sCHoolS, non-profit organizationS and mEdICal cENtEr facIlities DEdICAteD tO
tReaTiNG cHildrEn.   ENron empLoyees are nEedEd To accompany tHE cOnvoy and
inTerAct with the coMmuNity by CoMmuNIcatiNg tHe impOrtancE Of innoVation.
WheN rEGisterINg, pleasE DEsIgnaTe your time prefereNCe.  aVailable times
iNclude 9:00Am TO 1:00pM ANd 1:00pM to 4:00Pm - thank you FoR your
PArticipATiON!

vOluNTeers Needed!  WeDnesday, ApriL 25, 2001 At tHe GeorGe r. BrOWn
ConvEntioN CENteR, Exhibit HalL A.  frOm 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. tO assisT
With the tExas SchOlars SEniOr REcogNItIoN CeReMOny/lUnCheON.

ThIs ceremoNy ReCogniZes oVER 4,000 HIgh sChoOl seNiors Who met the progRam
RequIRemEnts fOr graDuatIoN from High scHool.  DUrIng the ceremony,
vOlunTeers are nEedEd To pLaCe the tExas ScHolArs MedalliOns arouND thE nECKS
oF HISD students.

PleasE cONTaCt JennifEr MillIGaN aT x35272 if you arE iNteRestED.

childbuilDErS, Houston'S AdvocATeS fOr MentaL HEalth iN CHilDreN,  is hoSTing
A speciAl lunch tIme evENt in honor of ChiLDren's Mental HeALtH aWaREnesS
WeEk at Hermann squaRE, feaTuriNG aCtoRS perfOrminG vIGnETtes on issues and
pareNtIng.  ZydEco muSic, free soft drInks and desERTS will alsO be
aVAiLAble.

Volunteers Will rEceive a freE T-shirt anD are nEeded to pUblicize tHE Event,
filL baLloOns, Set-UP TaBles and chairs, SERve dRiNks and dEseRts, and tO
asSisT wiTh cLeAn-up.  To sigN up for thEsE jObS, pLeaSe emaIL your namE,
pHonE nUmbEr, and EMail adDress To DoTtIe bAteS at dsquAReB@MSn.coM oR cAll
(713) 932-8440.

THe ENrOn RunNing cLub Is lookiNg for 75+ voluNteERs to AsSiSt at the special
OlympiCs summer TracK & FIelD Meet bEINg held ApRil 28 - 29.  There are many
volunteeR OpportuNitIes inCludIng timers, AwaRd escoRts, ASsistiNg at waTer
taBlEs, cHEEring ON AtHleTeS and more!  We ARE loOking FoR empLoyees,
fAmilies and friends tHAt cAn contribute a Few HourS OR wHo aRE

 Enron.  It
will visit En ron-design atedsto psin  the  com munity includi n g ou r adopted
schools, no n-pro fi t  org a ni zatio ns andm ed i c alce nt erfa c il ities  de dicated  to
treat ing  c hildren.   E n ro n employee s a re needed to  ac compan ythe convo y a nd
i nterac t  withthe commu ni t y by c o mmunica t i ng  the  importance of in n ov a tion.
Whenregist er i ng , ple ase  designate  y our t i me pref e re n c e . A vailable time s
include9 :00 am to1: 00p m  and 1 :00pm  t o  4: 00pm - than k yo u for you r
par t icipati o n!

Vol unteer s N eed ed!We dn esd ay ,  Ap r il  25 ,  20 01 at th eGe orgeR. B r o w n
Co nve ntio n Cen ter, ExhibitHal l A.  fr om 11 :00 a .m.to  1:00  p.m.to as si st
with the Te xasScholarsSen io r R ec ognit i on Cer emo ny/ Luncheo n.

Thi s  ce re m o n yrecognizes over 4, 00 0 hi gh schoo l seni o rs  w h o met th epro gram requi reme n ts  for gra duatio n  f ro m highsc hool. D uri ngthe c e remo ny,
v olunteer s are needed to plac e  the Texas Sc h ol a r sm edal lio ns around t he n e cks
ofH IS D s t udent s.

P le a se contact Jennifer Mi ll igan a t X35 272 if you ar e interest e d .

Child Buil d er s , Houston's Ad vocat es for Men t al Healt h inChildren ,  is hos t i ng
a sp eci allun cht i me  event in hon o r  ofCh ildren' s M ental H eal thAwa ren es s
Week a t Herman nSq ua re , f eatur i ng actor sper fo rmi ng vi g nettes  on i ssue san d
p arentin g .Z ydec omu sic,  fr ee  soft  dri n ksand des erts will  al s o be  av ailable .

Voluntee rs  will rece iv e a  freet - shirt an d are needed to publici z e the e ven t,
f illballoons,  se t-up t abl e s andchairs , ser ve  dr i n ks an d de ser ts , and to a s sis t wit hclea n-up. To sign up for the s e j obs, please e mai l yo u r  n ame ,  p hon en umb e r , and email add ress to Do tt i eBates at d s qua re b@msn.c om or c all ( 713) 93 2-8440.

The Enr on  Run n i ngClub is lo oking fo r 75+ vol u nteer s  t o ass ist  at th eSpe cial
Olymp i csSumme r Trac k& Fiel d Mee tbeing he ld April 28 - 29.  Ther e aremany
vo lunteer o ppo r tun ities inc ludi ng timers,  aw ard  esco rts ,  assi stin g  a t w a ter tabl e s, cheeri n gona t hl etes and mo r e !   W e are  lo o king f or e mployees,
famili e s and friendsthat c ancon t ribu te  a few hours o r w ho a re

 Enron._ It_
will visit Enron-designated stops_in the_community_including our_adopted_
schools, non-profit organizations_and medical center_facilities dedicated to
treating_children.  _Enron_employees are needed to accompany the convoy and
interact with the community by communicating_the_importance of_innovation.__
When registering, please designate_your time preference.  Available_times
include_9:00am to 1:00pm and 1:00pm to 4:00pm -_thank_you for your_
participation!

Volunteers Needed!  Wednesday, April 25, 2001 at the_George R. Brown
Convention Center, Exhibit_Hall A. _from_11:00_a.m. to 1:00 p.m._to assist
with the Texas Scholars_Senior Recognition Ceremony/Luncheon.

This ceremony recognizes over_4,000 high school seniors who met the_program
requirements for graduation from high_school.  During the ceremony,_
volunteers are_needed to place the Texas_Scholars medallions around_the necks_
of HISD students.

Please_contact Jennifer Milligan at X35272 if_you are interested.

ChildBuilders,_Houston's Advocates for Mental Health in_Children,_ is hosting_
a_special_lunch time_event in honor_of_Children's Mental_Health_Awareness
Week at Hermann Square, featuring_actors_performing vignettes on issues and
parenting. _Zydeco music, free soft_drinks_and deserts will also_be
available.

Volunteers will_receive a free t-shirt and are_needed to_publicize the_event,
fill balloons, set-up tables and chairs, serve drinks and deserts,_and to
assist with clean-up. _To sign up for_these jobs,_please_email your name,_
phone_number, and_email address to Dottie Bates at dsquareb@msn.com_or call_
(713) 932-8440.

The Enron Running Club is_looking for 75+ volunteers_to_assist at the Special
Olympics Summer_Track & Field Meet being held_April 28 - 29. _There_are_many
volunteer opportunities including timers,_award escorts, assisting at water
tables,_cheering on athletes_and more!  We are looking for_employees,_
families and friends that can contribute_a_few hours or who are


 Subject:
|
|                         |                         |   Minnesota telecom
|
|                         |                         |   ruling
|
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------
|

[IMAGE]

Scott--give me some guidance on how important or relevent this issue is for
us so that I can get a better understanding of what I should/should not
being spending time on.

The Minnesota PUC ruled yesterday the US West must open/share it's lines
with competitors offering digital subscriber line (DSL) high speed interent
access. ;Apparently the order is the first for a state, but I understand
that the FCC passed a similiar rule in the last month or so. ;The
Commission also ruled that USWest could charge an additional $6.00 for this
access to their lines (in addition to the current rate of $18 that the
customer pays) and that the DSL provider had the right to pass that charge
on to the customer. ;The COmmission took a "soft" position on the $6.00,
saying that they would review the amount of the charge over the next six
months before making a final ruling on that specific issue. ;I believe that
this ruling came about due to an initial complaint by ;a provider from
Colorado.

I did not follow this case at all other than occassionally reading
something about it. The major reason I did not was that I saw it as a
"retail" access issue and I see our video streaming and bandwidth
businesses as "wholesale" access/opportunity issues. ;Certainly we always
want to see open access and we want to see competitive parity, but I didn't
see that our involvment and/or tracking of this proceeding was of great
value. ;Am I correct?

(Embedded image moved to file: pic32453.pcx)
 - pic32453.pcx Please see the following articles:

San Diego Union, 3/19:  "Panel eases curbs on power plant"

San Diego Union, 3/19:  "State may have claim on further overbilling"

LA Times, Sun. 3/18:  "OPEC cut cited in call to boost US Oil Output"

LA Times, Sun,

Subject:
 |
 |                          |                          |    Minnesota telecom
 |
 |                          |                          |    ruling
 |
 |-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------
 |

 [ IMAGE ]

 Scott -- give me some steering on how authoritative or relevent this issue is for
 us so that I can get a good sympathy of what I should / should not
 being spending time on.

 The Minnesota PUC rule yesterday the US West must afford / share it's credit line
 with competitors offering digital subscriber tune (DSL) high speed interent
 entree. ;Apparently the order is the first for a state, but I understand
 that the FCC passed a similiar rule in the last calendar month or so. ;The
 Commission also ruled that USWest could appoint an additional $ 6.00 for this
 access to their line (in addition to the current pace of $ 18 that the
 customer pays) and that the DSL supplier had the right to pass that charge
 on to the customer. ;The COmmission consume a " soft " position on the $ 6.00,
 saying that they would review the amount of the charge over the future six
 months before making a final ruling on that specific issue. ;I believe that
 this ruling came about due to an initial complaint by ;a provider from
 Colorado.

 I did not keep up this case at all early than occassionally understand
 something about it. The major cause I did not was that I saw it as a
 " retail " access return and I determine our video streaming and bandwidth
 business as " wholesale " access / opportunity issues. ;Certainly we always
 want to see capable access and we want to see competitive parity, but I didn't
 go steady that our involvment and/or trailing of this proceeding was of big
 value. ;Am I correct?

 (Embedded image moved to charge: pic32453.pcx)
  - pic32453.pcx Please see the following articles:

 San Diego Union, 3/19:   " Panel eases curbs on power plant "

 San Diego Union, 3/19:   " State may have claim on further overbilling "

 LA Times, Sun. 3/18:   " OPEC cut quote in call to promote US Oil Output "

 LA Times, Sun,

 Suhject:
|
|                         |                         |   Minnesota telecom
|
|                         |                         |   euling
|
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------
|

[IMZNE]

Scoct--jive me some guldance on hmw important os fepevent this issue is for
us so that Y can grt a better undetstancyng kf what I should/should not
being spsnding uime on.

The Minnesoya PUC ruled yesterday the US Aest must open/sharf it's lines
qith xompetitors uffering dpyital subsctiber line (DSL) high speed interevt
acczss. ;Apparenjlg hve order is the sirst for a state, bud I undrrstand
that thc FCC pawsed a similiar rule mn the last month or so. ;The
Cokmnssion also ruled thar YSWesj cound cfqrgd ah eddjtionap $6.00 hor this
accsss to theie lines (in addition tj the current date os $18 that the
customer pays) and that the DSL prkvider had the right to pass that charge
on tl the cuseomer. ;The COmmission took a "soft" position on the $6.00,
vayinj ghau bmey diupd review the amount of the charge over the nqst spx
months before mcking a final rukijg jn that speciwic issue. ;I believe that
thid rulind camw about dte tp an initial complaint by ;a provider frjn
Colorado.

I did not follow thir caxe at all other than occassiunalmy reading
slmething zcout it. The majof rvasot I did not was that I saw it as a
"rxtail" access issoe and Y see our gideo streaming and bandaidth
yusinasses as "wjolesale" access/opportunity issuxx. ;Certainly ee alfays
want to sce open access wnd we want to see coipetigive paritj, but I dmdn't
see that our involvmetj and/or trackmng of thys peocewding wxr of great
valur. ;Am I cogrtct?

(Embeddee image moved to flle: pkd32453.pcx)
 - pic32453.pcx Plzcst wee the followong areiblex:

Swt Diego Uniot, 3/19:  "Oandk easds curbs on oowet plant"

San Diego Unimn, 3/19:  "State may have clsii on furjher overfilling"

LA Timrs, Sun. 3/18:  "OPEC cut fited in call to boost US Oil Output"

LA Times, Shn,

Subject: | | | | Minnesota telecom | ruling | | [IMAGE] Scott--give important relevent this issue for us so I can get a better understanding what I should/should not being spending time on. The Minnesota PUC ruled yesterday US West must open/share it's lines with competitors offering digital subscriber line (DSL) speed access. the is the first for a state, but I understand that the FCC passed a similiar rule the last month or so. ;The Commission also that USWest could charge additional $6.00 for this access their (in addition the rate $18 that the pays) and that the DSL provider had the right to pass that charge on to the customer. COmmission took position on $6.00, that would review the the charge over the next six a final ruling on that specific issue. ;I that this came about due to an initial by ;a provider from Colorado. I did not this case at all other than occassionally reading something about it. The major reason I was that I saw as a "retail" issue I our streaming and businesses as "wholesale" access/opportunity issues. ;Certainly we always want to see access and we want to see competitive parity, but I that involvment and/or tracking this proceeding was of value. I correct? (Embedded image file: - the articles: Diego Union, 3/19: "Panel curbs on power plant" San Union, 3/19: "State may LA Times, Sun. 3/18: "OPEC cut cited in to boost US Oil Output" LA Times,

 Subject:
|
|                         |                         |   Minnesota telecom
|
|                         |                         |   ruLing
|
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------
|

[IMAGE]

SCott--gIve Me sOmE guiDancE on how importanT Or reLevent this issue is for
us So thaT I CAn geT A bEtter UnderstANdING of WhAt i shOuLD/sHould Not
Being spEnding time On.

THe minnesota PUC RUlEd yesterdaY thE US West must oPen/Share iT's LinES
with ComPetitOrs offERing diGital subsCrIBer linE (dSL) high SPEeD intErent
access. ;AppareNTlY The order is the fIrst foR a STaTE, But i unDerstand
thAt The FCc Passed a SImILIAr rULe in the last moNth or so. ;The
COMmiSsion aLsO ruLEd that uSWesT cOUld Charge an addItioNal $6.00 for thiS
accesS To their LInes (in aDditioN to The CurrENt RaTe oF $18 tHAt tHE
cUstOMer Pays) and tHaT tHe DSL ProvIDER Had tHe rIght To pasS that charge
on To tHe cuSTomEr. ;The cOmmiSsioN tOok a "sOft" posItion On The $6.00,
saying that thEy woUld review The AmOunT oF the cHArge ovEr tHe nExt six
mOnths beFOre MaKING a Final ruling on that sPeCIFiC issue. ;I bElieve THaT
tHIs ruling CaMe aBout DUE to an InitIAl ComplainT by ;a prOViDeR from
CoLoRado.

I dId Not FolLow thIS casE at all Other thaN occaSSionally readinG
Something abouT It. tHE mAJor rEasOn I did not waS thaT i saw It as A
"ReTaiL" AccesS issuE aND I SEe our video streaming AnD bandwIdth
bUsinesses as "whOlesale" accESS/OpportunIty iSSuES. ;Certainly we alWays
wAnt to see opEN access aNd we wAnt to see CompetitiVE Parity, buT I dIdn'T
seE thAT OuR involvment anD/OR traCkIng of thIs pRoceediNg wAs oF grEat
VaLue. ;Am I corRect?

(EmbeDdEd ImAgE moVed to FIle: pic32453.pcX)
 - pIc32453.pCx pleAse seE The folLowinG artIcLeS:

san diego UnIOn, 3/19:  "pANel eAsEs CurbS on PoWer plAnt"

SAN DiEgo UnioN, 3/19:  "State may HavE ClaiM oN fUrther oVerbilling"

LA TImEs, Sun. 3/18:  "OPEC cUt CitEd in caLL To boost Us Oil Output"

LA Times, Sun,

 Subject:
|
|                     |                     |   Mi nnesota telecom
|
|                 |               |  rulin g
|
|------ - -- ---------- --- ---+-------- --- ------ -- --- - --+-- --- ----- ------ - ------ --
|

[ IMAGE]

Scott - - gi ve m e some guidance o n  h o w important or  relev en t  t h i s i ssu e is for
u sso th a t I can ge t a  be t ter understan ding of wha t  Ishould /s hou l d notbeing  s p end ing time on .

T he Minnes ota PU C  ruledy esterda y theUSWes t mu s top en/ sh a rei t' s l i nes
with co mp et itors  off e r i n g di git al s ubscr iber line (DS L)high spe ed in teren t
ac ce ss.  ;Appar ently  t he order is the  fir st for asta te , b ut  I un d erstan d
t hat  the FC C passe d  asi m i l ia r rule in the last  m o n th  or so.;TheC om mi s sion als orul ed t h a t USW estc ou ld charg e an a d di ti onal $6 .0 0 forth isacc ess t o  the ir lin es (in a dditi o n to the curre n t rate of $18 th a t  t h e
cu sto mer pays) a nd t h at t he D S Lpro v iderhad t he ri g ht to pass that cha rg e
on t o the  customer. ; The COmmis s i o n took a  "so f t" position on th e $6. 00,
saying that the y wou ld revie w the amo u n t of the  ch arg e o ver t he  next six
mon t h s be fo re maki nga final  ru lin g o n t ha t specifi c issue.   ;I  b el iev e tha t
this ru li ngca meabout due to  an i niti al  c o mpl aint by ; a prov id er  fro m
C ol orado .

I did  not fo llow this  ca s e at  a ll  otherthan occassio na lly readin gsom ething a bout it.  The major reason I did not was  th at Isawit as a
" ret ail" a cce s s issu e andI see  o urv i deo s t r ea min gand bandwi d t h
b usine ss es a s "whol esale" access/oppo r tun ity issues.  ;Ce rtai n l ywea lw a yswa n t t o see open access  and we wa nt to  see compe t iti ve  parity , but I  didn ' t
see t hat our i nvolvment  a nd/o r tra cking of t his proc eeding wa s  of g r ea t
val ue.  ;AmIcor rect?

( Emb edded  image  m oved t o fil e:  pic3245 3.pcx)
 - pic32453.pcxPlease  seethe  followin g a r tic les:

Sa n Di ego Union,  3/ 19:   "Pa nel eases  cur b sonp owerplan t "

San Di e go  Un i o n,  3/19:  "St a t e  ma y hav e c l aim on  fur ther overbilling"
LA Times, Sun . 3/ 1 8 : "OP E C cu tcited in calltobo o s t US Oil  O utput"

LATimes, S un ,

 Subject:_ _
|
|_ __ __  _  _   _  __    |         __ ___    _    _| _ Minnesota telecom
|
|__  _        _     _  ___|   _     _     _      _  |   ruling_    _ _    _  _
|
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------
|

[IMAGE]

Scott--give me_some guidance on_how important or relevent this issue_is for
us so_that I can get a better_understanding_of what I_should/should_not
being_spending time_on.

The Minnesota PUC_ruled_yesterday the_US_West must open/share it's lines
with competitors_offering_digital subscriber line (DSL) high speed interent
access._;Apparently the order is_the_first for a state,_but I understand
that the FCC_passed a similiar rule in the_last month_or so._;The
Commission also ruled that USWest could charge an additional $6.00 for_this
access to their lines (in addition_to the current rate_of $18_that_the
customer pays) and_that_the DSL_provider had the right to pass that_charge
on to_the customer. ;The COmmission took a_"soft" position on the_$6.00,
saying_that they would review the amount_of the charge over the next_six
months before making a final_ruling_on_that specific issue. ;I believe_that
this ruling came about due to_an initial complaint_by ;a provider from
Colorado.

I did not follow_this_case at all other than occassionally_reading
something_about it. The major reason I_did_not_was that I saw it_as a
"retail" access issue and I_see our video streaming and bandwidth
businesses as "wholesale" access/opportunity_issues. ;Certainly we_always
want to see open access_and_we_want to see competitive parity, but I didn't
see that our_involvment and/or_tracking of this_proceeding was of great
value. ;Am I correct?

(Embedded image moved to_file: pic32453.pcx)
 - pic32453.pcx Please see the_following articles:

San Diego Union, 3/19:  "Panel eases curbs on power_plant"

San Diego Union, 3/19:  "State may have_claim on further overbilling"

LA Times, Sun. 3/18:_ "OPEC cut cited_in_call to boost US Oil Output"

LA Times,_Sun,