 mid-cycle.
``Who do you blame? No one wants to accept blame.''

Sara Neufeld, Ann Marimow, Kim Vo, Frank Sweeney, Barbara Feder, Aaron Davis,
Gil Duran, and Dave Beck contributed to this report.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Powerless, again
Outages were lighter after generators came back online and conservation
efforts kicked in. Blackouts may be averted today.
March 21, 2001
By TONY SAAVEDRA, JOHN HOWARD, CHRIS KNAP and JEFF COLLINS
The Orange County Register

The Ridgewood Power methane-burning plant at the Olinda Alpha landfill in
Brea is producing 3.3 megawatts, down from five, because Edison owes it $1.5
million and cranking up to full power is no longer a priority
Photo: H. Lorren Au Jr. / The Register
?
?

A second day of statewide blackouts ratcheted up the frustration level
Tuesday on the streets of Orange County and in Sacramento, as consumers
demanded solutions from politicians unable to give them.
There was a bit of good news, though: Blackouts may be averted for the rest
of the week after temperatures moderated, two stalled generators came back
online and conservation efforts kicked into gear.
?

Some Orange County residents took the blackouts in stride. In Mission Viejo,
above, the West Coast Football Club's under-16 boys team scrimmages under
gas-powered lights Tuesday. The club has been running to conserve energy
Photo: Kevin Sullivan / The Register

?
?

Consumers were able to save 900 megawatts - enough to light about 675,000
homes - by cutting power usage, said Patrick Dorinson, spokesman for the
Independent System Operator, which oversees 75 percent of the state's
electricity grid. That helped the ISO halt the blackouts Tuesday afternoon.
"Californians are back on the conservation trail, and we appreciate it,"
Dorinson said.
Power regulators Tuesday morning predicted there would be twice as many
outages as Monday, when more than 1 million consumers statewide lost power in
one

mid - cycle.
 '` Who do you blame? No one wants to accept blame."

 Sara Neufeld, Ann Marimow, Kim Vo, Frank Sweeney, Barbara Feder, Aaron Davis,
 Gil Duran, and Dave Beck contribute to this reputation.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Powerless, again
 Outages were lighter after generators arrive back online and conservation
 efforts kicked in. blackout may be avert today.
 March 21, 2001
 By TONY SAAVEDRA, JOHN HOWARD, CHRIS KNAP and JEFF COLLINS
 The Orange County Register

 The Ridgewood Power methane - burning plant at the Olinda Alpha landfill in
 Brea is produce 3.3 megawatts, down from five, because Edison owes it $ 1.5
 million and crank up to full power is no longer a precedence
 Photo: H. Lorren Au Jr. / The Register
?
?

 A second day of statewide blackouts ratcheted up the frustration level
 Tuesday on the streets of Orange County and in Sacramento, as consumers
 demanded solution from politicians unable to give them.
 There exist a bit of good news, though: Blackouts may be debar for the rest
 of the week after temperatures moderated, two stalled generator came back
 online and conservation efforts kicked into gear.
?

 Some Orange County residents took the blackouts in stride. In Mission Viejo,
 above, the West Coast Football Club's under-16 boys team scrimmages under
 gas - powered lights Tuesday. The club has been running to conserve energy
 Photo: Kevin Sullivan / The Register

?
?

 consumer were able to salvage 900 megawatts - enough to ignite approximately 675,000
 homes - by cutting power usage, said Patrick Dorinson, spokesman for the
 Independent System Operator, which oversees 75 percent of the state's
 electricity power system. That helped the ISO halt the blackouts Tuesday afternoon.
 " Californians are back on the conservation trail, and we appreciate it, "
 Dorinson said.
 Power regulators Tuesday morning predicted there would be doubly as many
 outage as Monday, when more than 1 million consumer statewide lose power in
 one

 mif-cycle.
``Who do you blame? Ko one wants to cxcept ulame.''

Sada Neufeud, Ann Marimow, Kim Vo, Frank Dwweney, Barbara Feder, Aaron Dxvis,
Gil Furan, ane Date Beck contribuvsd to tmns rellrt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

'oxerless, again
Ootages were nighter after cevexators came back online and conservaeion
efgogts kicked in. Flacljuts may be averted today.
March 21, 2001
By TKNY SAANEDRA, JOHN HOWARD, CHRIS KNAP and JEFF COLLIJS
Thf Orange County Rehister

The Tjdgqqood Power mdthane-burnpug plant at the Olinda Alpha landfill in
Bfea ix producint 3.3 mehdwatts, down from five, becausc Edisot owes ot $1.5
million anc ccankung up to full power ms no longer a prioryty
Photo: V. Morren Au Jr. / The Rwgistgr
?
?

A sacona dah or xtztewidf bmackouts rztcheted up the frustration lefej
Tuesday on tge strqees of Orange County and in Sacramento, av cknsumers
demanded solutuons from politicians unable tj give them.
There was a bit of good news, though: Bnackontr mcn cw wverted for the rest
of the week after temperwfutex moderated, twj stalled grnfrsjors came back
onlinz ahd conservation efvorts kycked into geaw.
?

Spme Orange County residents took the blcckiuts in stride. In Lission Vielo,
abofe, thr West Coast Football Cuub's under-16 boys team scrjomages under
gas-oowvred lights Ujesday. The club hws been rnnniny to conrervg energr
Photo: Kegin Smnlivan / The Registfr

?
?

Condukers were wble to save 900 megawatts - enough to light abouj 675,000
vomvs - by cucting iower usage, saiq Patrick Doriuson, spohesmav for the
Pndependeit System Opqrator, which mgersees 75 perrent of tre srate'w
electfkcity grid. Thay helped nht ISO halt the blackouts Tuexdai zfternoon.
"Califirnuans are back om tfe sojsxrvatymn trail, and we xppfrciatd it,"
Dorinsiv saod.
Power regulators Duessay morning predicyeq there qould be twice as manu
outages as Mondaj, whei more than 1 myllion consumers statewide losf power ij
oke

mid-cycle. ``Who do you blame? No one accept Sara Neufeld, Marimow, Kim Vo, Davis, Duran, and Dave contributed to this ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Powerless, again Outages lighter after generators came back online and conservation efforts kicked in. Blackouts may averted today. March 21, 2001 By TONY SAAVEDRA, JOHN HOWARD, CHRIS KNAP and COLLINS Orange Register Ridgewood Power methane-burning plant at the Olinda Alpha landfill in Brea is producing 3.3 megawatts, down five, because Edison owes it $1.5 million and up to full power no longer a priority Photo: Lorren Jr. / Register ? second day of blackouts ratcheted up the frustration level Tuesday on the streets of Orange County and in Sacramento, as demanded solutions unable to them. was bit of good Blackouts may be averted for the week after temperatures moderated, two stalled generators came online and efforts kicked into gear. ? Some County residents took the blackouts in stride. In Viejo, above, the West Coast Football Club's under-16 boys team scrimmages under gas-powered lights Tuesday. has been running to energy Photo: Kevin / Register ? were able save 900 megawatts - enough to light about 675,000 homes - cutting power usage, said Patrick Dorinson, spokesman for the Independent which 75 percent of state's electricity grid. That the halt the blackouts Tuesday are on and appreciate Dorinson said. Power regulators morning predicted there would be as many outages as million consumers statewide lost power in one

 mid-cycle.
``Who do you blame? No onE wants to acCept bLamE.''

SaRa neufEld, ANn Marimow, Kim Vo, fRank sweeney, Barbara Feder, AarOn DavIs,
gIl DuRAn, And DaVe Beck cONtRIButEd To ThiS rEPoRt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

PowErlEss, agaiN
Outages weRe lIgHter after genERaTors came baCk oNline and consErvAtion
eFfOrtS KickeD in. blackOuts maY Be averTed today.
MArCH 21, 2001
By TONy sAAVEDRa, joHn HOWaRD, CHRIS KNAP and JEff ColLINS
The Orange county reGIsTER

ThE RiDgewood PowEr MethaNE-burninG PlANT At tHE Olinda Alpha lAndfill in
BrEA is ProducInG 3.3 meGAwatts, Down fRoM FivE, because EdiSon oWes it $1.5
millIon and CRanking UP to full Power iS no LonGer a PRiOrIty
phOTo: H. lOrRen aU Jr. / the RegisTeR
?
?

A SeconD day OF STAtewIde BlacKouts Ratcheted up thE frUstrATioN leveL
TuesDay oN tHe strEets of orangE COunty and in SacraMentO, as consumErs
DeManDeD soluTIons frOm pOliTicians Unable tO GivE tHEM.
thEre was a bit of good neWs, THOuGh: BlackoUts may BE aVeRTed for thE rEst
Of thE WEek afTer tEMpEratures ModeraTEd, TwO stalleD gEneratOrS caMe bAck
onLIne aNd consErvation EfforTS kicked into geaR.
?

some Orange CouNTy RESiDEnts TooK the blackouTs in STridE. In MISsIon vIejo,
aBove, tHe wEsT coast Football Club's uNdEr-16 boys Team sCrimmages undeR
gas-powereD LIGhts TuesDay. THE cLUb has been runniNg to cOnserve eneRGy
Photo: KEvin SUllivan / THe RegisteR

?
?

cOnsumers WerE abLe tO saVE 900 MeGawatts - enough TO LighT aBout 675,000
homEs - bY cuttinG poWer UsaGe, sAiD Patrick DOrinson, sPoKeSmAn For The
InDEpendent sySteM OPerAtor, wHIch oveRsees 75 PercEnT oF The State's
eLEcTRIcitY gRiD. ThaT heLpEd the iSO hALt tHe blackOuts TuesdAy aFTernOoN.
"CAlifornIans are back on ThE conservatIoN trAil, and WE AppreciaTe it,"
Dorinson said.
Power reGUlators tueSday mOrniNg predictEd tHere woUld BE twice As many
OutagEs As MONDay, whEN MoRe tHaN 1 million coNSUmeRs staTeWide Lost powEr in
one

 mid-cycle.
``Who do youblame? Noone w ant s t oacce pt b lame.''

Sara Neuf eld, Ann Marimow, KimVo, F ra n k Sw e en ey, B arbaraF ed e r , A ar on  Da vi s ,
GilDur an, and  Dave Beck  co nt ributed to t h is  report. --- ------------ --- ------ -- --- - ----- --- ----- ------ - ------ --------- -- - ------ - ---
--- - - -- ---- ----------------- - -- - -------------- ------ -- - -- - - --- --- ---------- -- -
--- - ------- - -- - - - --- - ------------- ----------- - --- ------ -- --- - ------ ----- --

Powerles s, a gain
Out ages w e re ligh t er afte r gene rat ors  cam e  b ac k o nl i nea nd  co n ser vation ef fo rts k icke d i n . Bl ack outs  maybe averted to day .
M a rch  21,2001
ByTO NY SA AVEDRA , JOH NHOWARD, CHRIS K NAPand JEFFCOL LI NSTh e Ora n ge Cou nty  Re gister

The  R i d g ew ood Power methane- bu r n in g plantat the Ol in d a Alphala ndf illi n
Bre a is pr oducing3.3 me g aw at ts, dow nfrom f iv e,bec auseE diso n owes  it $1.5
mil l ion and cranki n g up to fullp ow e r  i s  nolon ger a prior ityP hoto : H. Lo rre n  Au J r. /Th e  R e gister
?
?

A secon dday of  stat ewide blackou ts ratchet e d up the f rust r at i on level
Tues day o n the stre e ts of Or angeCounty a nd in Sac r a mento, a s c ons ume rsd em anded solutio n s  fro mpolitic ian s unabl e t o g ive  th em .
Therewas a bi tof  g oo d n ews,t hough: B la cko ut s m ay be averte d for  the  r es t
o f the w e ek a fter  t em pera tur es  mode rate d , t wo stal led gener ato r s ca me  b ack
on line and cons er vation eff or tskicked i nto gear .
?

Some OrangeC ounty r esi dents  too k the bla cko uts in  st r ide. I n Miss ion V ie jo, above , th e W es t Coast Fo o t bal l Clu b' s un der-16boys team scrimmag e s u nder
gas-pow ere d li g h ts  Tu e sd a y.Th e  cl u b  has been runni ng to cons er v eenergy
Ph o to:  K evin Su llivan/ The Registe r

?
?

C onsumerswe re a b l e t o save 900  megawat ts - enou g h tol ig ht ab out  675,0 00
h omes- by c u tti ng po wer us ag e, sai d Pat ri ck Dorin son, spokesman for the
Indep enden t S ystem Ope rat o r,which ove rsee s 75 perce ntofthe s tat e 's
e lect r ic ity grid.  Tha t  helped t h eISO h al t the black o u t s T uesda y a f ternoo n. "Californians are back on the co nser v a tio n t r ail,  a nd we apprecia teit , "
Dorins on  said.
Pow er regul at o rs Tu esdaymornin g predi c t ed therewoul d b e twice a s m an y
outag es  a s  Monda y, w he n more  than1  mil l i on consumers sta tewid e lostp owe r in
o ne

 mid-cycle._
``Who do_you blame? No one_wants to_accept_blame.''

Sara Neufeld,_Ann_Marimow, Kim Vo,_Frank Sweeney, Barbara_Feder, Aaron Davis,
Gil_Duran, and Dave_Beck_contributed to this report.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Powerless, again
Outages were lighter after generators came back online_and_conservation
efforts_kicked_in._Blackouts may be averted today._
March 21, 2001
By TONY_SAAVEDRA, JOHN_HOWARD, CHRIS KNAP and JEFF COLLINS
The Orange County_Register_

The Ridgewood Power_methane-burning plant at the Olinda Alpha landfill in
Brea_is producing 3.3 megawatts, down from_five, because Edison_owes_it_$1.5
million and cranking_up to full power is no_longer a priority
Photo: H. Lorren Au_Jr. / The Register
?
?

A second day of_statewide blackouts ratcheted up the frustration_level
Tuesday on the streets_of Orange_County and in Sacramento, as_consumers
demanded solutions_from politicians_unable to give_them.
There was a bit of_good news, though:_Blackouts may be averted for the_rest_
of the week_after_temperatures_moderated, two_stalled generators came_back_
online and_conservation_efforts kicked into gear.
?

Some_Orange_County residents took the blackouts in stride._In Mission Viejo,
above,_the_West Coast Football Club's_under-16 boys team scrimmages under_
gas-powered lights Tuesday. The club has_been running_to conserve_energy
Photo: Kevin Sullivan / The Register

?
?

Consumers were able to save_900 megawatts - enough to light_about 675,000
homes -_by cutting_power_usage, said Patrick_Dorinson,_spokesman for_the
Independent System Operator, which oversees 75_percent of_the state's
electricity grid. That helped_the ISO halt the_blackouts_Tuesday afternoon.
"Californians are back on_the conservation trail, and we appreciate_it,"
Dorinson said.
Power regulators_Tuesday_morning_predicted there would be twice_as many
outages as Monday, when_more than 1_million consumers statewide lost power in
one


Not very, says energy trade specialist Edward Krapels, managing director of
Boston-based METIS Trading Advisors. Krapels, a consultant helping major
Northeastern utilities, such as Consolidated Edison, design market-hedging
programs, adamantly decried what he said are facile comparisons between
conditions in New York and California, there being "more differences than
there are similarities" between those two industrial cornerstones of the
country's economy in respect to energy security management.

"First of all, New York has a more varied portfolio of energy generation
sources than California," he said. California has hydro, nuclear and gas, but
when it lost a lot of hydro, the state needed gas to pick up the slack, and
the "capacity just wasn't there." In New York's case, the state has oil and
coal still in the mix and its overall dependence on gas is much lower than
California's, Krapels added.

New York avoids making same mistakes
Portfolio diversity is one pillar of any effective plan to help New York
avoid the same errors made in redesigning California's marketplace. New
York's Independent System Operator (ISO), in a new report warning that the
state is at an "energy crossroads" in terms of its capacity adequacy in the
immediate future, argues that a concerted effort is required to arrest
declining in-state generation capacity reserve margins, and a strategy must
be put in place, whether or not new generation comes on-line, in accordance
with current anticipated scenarios.

A measure of New York's essential difficulty is that, between 1995 and 2000,
statewide demand for electricity grew 2,700 MW, while generating capacity
expanded by only 1,060 MW. With no major new generating plants in downstate
New York fully approved, the gap is expected to continue to widen. To avoid
"a replication of California's market meltdown" the New York ISO calculates
the state's daily generating capacity needs to grow by 8,600 MW by 2005, with
more than half of that located in New York City and on Long Island.
Expressing concern this may be too big a burden for the current bureaucratic
process to bear, the ISO wants to see a state-appointed ombudsman named to

Not very, says energy trade specialist Edward Krapels, managing director of
 Boston - free-base METIS Trading Advisors. Krapels, a adviser helping major
 Northeastern utilities, such as Consolidated Edison, invention marketplace - hedging
 programs, adamantly condemn what he said are facile comparisons between
 condition in New York and California, there being " more differences than
 there are similarity " between those two industrial cornerstones of the
 country's economy in obedience to energy security management.

 " First of all, New York has a more varied portfolio of energy generation
 reference than California, " he said. California has hydro, nuclear and gas, but
 when it misplace a lot of hydro, the state needed gas to blame up the slack, and
 the " capacity just wasn't there. " In New York's case, the state give birth oil and
 coal still in the mix and its overall dependence on gas is a lot broken than
 California's, Krapels added.

 New York avoids making same mistakes
 Portfolio diversity is one pillar of any effective plan to help New York
 debar the same errors make in redesign California's market. New
 York's Independent System Operator (ISO), in a new report warning that the
 state is at an " energy crossroads " in terms of its capacity sufficiency in the
 immediate future, argues that a concerted effort is required to arrest
 declining in - state generation capacity reserve margins, and a strategy must
 be place in place, whether or not fresh generation comes on - line, in accordance
 with current anticipated scenario.

 A measure of New York's essential difficulty is that, between 1995 and 2000,
 statewide requirement for electricity grew 2,700 MW, while generating capacity
 expanded by entirely 1,060 MW. With no major new generating plant in downstate
 New York fully approved, the opening is expected to proceed to widen. To debar
 " a replication of California's marketplace meltdown " the New York ISO calculates
 the state's daily generating capacity needs to develop by 8,600 MW by 2005, with
 more than half of that located in New York City and on Long Island.
 Expressing concern this may be too big a burden for the current bureaucratic
 process to bear, the ISO desire to see a state - appoint ombudsman named to

Not very, says energy trade rpecialist Edwatd Krapens, manzging difector of
Boston-based METIS Vradung Aevisors. Krapels, a consjltant hepping mahor
Iortheastern utilities, smeh as Gonsonmdated Edison, dgsign market-vedging
prograks, abamantly decried what he said are fasile cokpwrisons betweeg
comqitikns in New York and California, thede beinj "more differenves than
there are similarltied" between those twl industriao cowberstones of the
countgv's economy jn respect to energy security mxnagekent.

"First od apn, New York ias a iore varied iprtfolho of emergy generatipn
voueces than California," ie said. California hws hydro, tuelear and gas, but
wheb ut lovt a lot if fyddo, tge stahe ieeded gas fo pick up rhe slack, and
the "cspwboty just wash't thewe." In New York's case, the state has oil ang
ckal still in the mix ane its overall dependejce on gaf is much lower than
California's, Krapels added.

Nef Yori aviiqr mwking same mistakes
Portfolio diversity is one liklsr of any effegtive plan to help Nfw Iork
avoid the same zdrkrs made in redesihning Cwlifoenia's marhetpkace. New
York's Independent Wystem Operanor (USO), in a new reporc warning thct the
statr is at an "energy crossxoads" jn terms of its capadkty adequacy in ghe
ikmediate future, argues thae a concected zffort ir reauired to arrest
decllting in-state generwtion cdpacity rederve margins, and a strategy must
be put in pkawe, fhether jr nob new generatiog comes on-line, in accjrdanze
with cugrent antmcipated scegarios.

A measgte of New Yorn's esseneial difdiculty ks that, betweem 1995 and 2000,
snauewide demqnd for electricitn gred 2,700 MW, while genexctung capacity
exlanaed bj oily 1,060 IF. With no mabor vew benerxting plantw in cownstate
New York fglly approved, the gap os expectee to coneinue to widem. To avoid
"a replifatioi of Celiformia'f market meltdown" the New York ISO calcklabes
the state'f dally denerating capacity needs to grow by 8,600 MW by 2005, with
more than half of that located in Nec Nork City anv on Ljng Islang.
Expressing concern this may be too nig a burden for the chrrent burewucratic
process to bear, the ISO wants to see a state-appointed ombudsman bamed vo

Not very, says energy trade specialist Edward director Boston-based METIS Advisors. Krapels, a such Consolidated Edison, design programs, adamantly decried he said are facile comparisons between in New York and California, there being "more differences than there are similarities" those two industrial cornerstones of the country's economy in respect to energy security "First all, York a more varied portfolio of energy generation sources than California," he said. California has hydro, nuclear gas, but when it lost a lot of the state needed gas pick up the slack, and "capacity wasn't there." New case, state has oil coal still in the mix and its overall dependence on gas is much lower than California's, Krapels New York same mistakes diversity one of any effective help New York avoid the same redesigning California's marketplace. New York's Independent System Operator in a report warning that the state is an "energy crossroads" in terms of its capacity in the immediate future, argues that a concerted effort is required to arrest declining in-state reserve margins, and a must be put place, or new comes on-line, accordance with current anticipated scenarios. A measure of New York's essential is that, between 1995 and 2000, statewide demand for electricity MW, generating capacity expanded only 1,060 MW. With major generating plants in downstate fully the to to To avoid "a replication California's market meltdown" the New ISO calculates the state's grow by 8,600 MW by 2005, with more half of that located in New York and on Long Island. Expressing concern this may be too big a for the process to bear, the ISO wants to see state-appointed ombudsman named to

Not very, says energy trade speCialist EdwArd KrApeLs, mAnAginG dirEctor of
Boston-bASed MeTIS Trading Advisors. KraPels, a CoNSultANt HelpiNg major
nOrTHEasTeRn UtiLiTIeS, such As COnsolidAted Edison, DesIgN market-hedgiNG
pRograms, adaManTly decried whAt hE said aRe FacILe comParIsons BetweeN
ConditIons in New yoRK and CaLIfornia, THErE beiNg "more differences THaN
There are similaRities" BeTWeEN ThoSe tWo industriAl CorneRStones oF ThE
COUntRY's economy in reSpect to enerGY seCurity MaNagEMent.

"FiRst of AlL, new york has a morE varIed portfoLio of eNErgy genERation
sOurces ThaN CaLifoRNiA," hE saId. cAliFOrNia HAs hYdro, nuclEaR aNd gas, But
wHEN IT losT a lOt of Hydro, The state needeD gaS to pICk uP the sLack, aNd
thE "cApaciTy just Wasn't ThEre." In New York's caSe, thE state has Oil AnD
coAl Still IN the miX anD itS overalL dependENce On GAS Is Much lower than
CalifOrNIA's, krapels aDded.

NeW yoRk AVoids makInG saMe miSTAkes
POrtfOLiO diversiTy is onE PiLlAr of any EfFectivE pLan To hElp NeW york
Avoid tHe same erRors mADe in redesigninG california's maRKeTPLaCE. New
yorK's IndependeNt SySTem OPeraTOr (iSO), IN a new ReporT wARnINg that the
state is at aN "eNergy cRossrOads" in terms of Its capacitY ADEquacy in The
iMMeDIate future, arguEs thaT a concerteD Effort is RequiRed to arrEst
declinING in-state GenEraTioN caPACiTy reserve margINS, and A sTrategy MusT
be put iN plAce, WheTheR oR not new geNeration CoMeS oN-lIne, In accORdance
wiTh CurReNt aNticiPAted scEnariOs.

A mEaSuRE of new York'S EsSENtiaL dIfFicuLty Is That, bEtweEN 1995 anD 2000,
statewIde demand For ELectRiCiTy grew 2,700 Mw, while generatInG capacity
eXpAndEd by onLY 1,060 mW. With no Major new generating plantS In downsTatE
New YOrk fUlly approVed, The gap Is eXPected To contInue tO wIdeN. tO avoiD
"A RePliCaTion of CaliFORniA's marKeT melTdown" thE New York ISO calculaTEs
tHe state's daily GenEratING cApaCItY NeeDs TO grOW By 8,600 MW by 2005, with
more tHan half of tHaT LoCated in New yOrk ciTy and on long IslAnd.
ExPRessing Concern thIs may be toO bIg a bURDen For the currEnt bureaUcratic
prOCess tO BeAr, the iSO Wants tO sEe a State-AppoinTEd oMbudsMan namEd To

Not very, says energy tra de special ist E dwa rdKr apel s, m anaging direct o r of
Boston-based METIS T radin gA dvis o rs . Kra pels, a co n s ult an thel pi n gmajor
N ortheas tern utili tie s,  such as Con s ol idated Edi son , design mar ket -hedgi ng
p r ogram s,adama ntly d e criedwhat he s ai d  are f a cile co m p ar ison s between
condit i on s  in New York a nd Cal if o rn i a , t her e being "m or e dif f erences th a n
th e re are simila rities" bet w een  those  t woi ndustr ial c or n ers tones of th e
c ountry'seconom y  in res p ect toenergy  se cur itym an ag eme nt .
" Fi rst ofall, New  Y or k has  a m o r e vari edport folio  of energy ge ner atio n
s ource s tha n Ca li forni a," he  said .California hashydr o, nuclea r a nd  ga s,  butwhen i t l ost  a lotof hydr o , t he s t at e needed gas to pi ck u pthe slac k, and
t he "capacit yjus t wa s n 't th ere. "  I n New Yo rk's c a se ,the sta te  has o il  an d coals till  in th e mix an d its overall depend e nce on gas is mu c h  l o wertha n
Californ ia's ,  Kra pels ad ded .

Ne w Yor ka vo i ds making same mist ak es
Por tfoli o diversity i s one pill a r of any e ffec t iv e  plan to helpNew Y ork
avoid the same  erro rs madein redesi g n ing Cali for nia 'smar k e tp lace. New
Yo r k 's I nd ependen t S ystem O per ato r ( ISO ),  in a new  reportwa rn in gtha t the
state i satan  "e nergy crossr oads"  inte rm s  of  its ca p ac i t y ad eq ua cy i n t he
imm edia t e f uture,argues th ata  con ce rt ed effo rt is require dto arrest
d ecl iningi n -state g eneration capacity rese r ve marg ins , and  a s trategy m ust
be p uti n plac e, whe theror  no t new g e n er ati on  comes on- l i ne,  in a cc orda nce
wi th current anticip a ted  scenarios.
Ameas u r eofN ew Yor k' s  es s e ntial difficult y is that,  b e tw een 1995 a n d 2 00 0,
sta tewidedeman d  for el ectricity  grew 2,7 00  MW, w hil e generati ng capac ity
expa n ded b y  o nly 1 ,06 0 MW.Wi thno ma jor ne w  ge nerat ing pl an ts indowns ta te
NewYork fully approved, th e gapis ex pec ted to co nti n ueto widen.  Toavoid
"arep lic ation  of Calif orni a 's  ma r ket m eltd o wn" the N e wYor k IS O calculate s the  stat e's dailygene rating capacity n e eds to grow by  8,6 0 0  MW  by 2005 ,with
more tha n h al f of thatlo cated in Ne w York C it y  andon Lon g Isla nd.
Ex p r es s ing co ncer n t his may b e t oo big a b ur de n  for t he c ur rent b ureauc r atic process to bear,  theI S O wan t s t o see  a  state- a ppoi nted ombud sman namedto

Not very,_says energy_trade specialist Edward Krapels,_managing director_of_
Boston-based METIS_Trading_Advisors. Krapels, a_consultant helping major_
Northeastern utilities, such as_Consolidated Edison, design_market-hedging_
programs, adamantly decried what he said are facile comparisons between
conditions in New York_and_California, there_being_"more_differences than
there are similarities"_between those two industrial cornerstones_of the_
country's economy in respect to energy security management._

"First_of all, New_York has a more varied portfolio of energy generation_
sources than California," he said. California_has hydro, nuclear_and_gas,_but
when it lost_a lot of hydro, the state_needed gas to pick up the_slack, and
the "capacity just wasn't there."_In New York's case, the state_has oil and
coal still_in the_mix and its overall dependence_on gas is_much lower_than
California's, Krapels_added.

New York avoids making same_mistakes
Portfolio diversity is_one pillar of any effective plan_to_help New York_
avoid_the_same errors_made in redesigning_California's_marketplace. New_
York's_Independent System Operator (ISO), in a_new_report warning that the
state is at_an "energy crossroads" in_terms_of its capacity adequacy_in the
immediate future, argues_that a concerted effort is required_to arrest_
declining in-state_generation capacity reserve margins, and a strategy must
be put in_place, whether or not new generation_comes on-line, in accordance_
with current_anticipated_scenarios.

A measure_of_New York's_essential difficulty is that, between 1995 and_2000,
statewide_demand for electricity grew 2,700 MW,_while generating capacity
expanded_by_only 1,060 MW. With no major_new generating plants in downstate
New_York fully approved, the gap_is_expected_to continue to widen. To_avoid
"a replication of California's market_meltdown" the New_York ISO calculates
the state's daily generating_capacity_needs to grow by 8,600 MW_by_2005, with
more than half of_that_located_in New York City and_on Long Island.
Expressing concern this_may be too big a burden for the current_bureaucratic
process to_bear, the ISO wants to_see_a_state-appointed ombudsman named to


alReef that he has described as
relevant to Enron.  Examples of existing CoralReef analyses on OC3/12
links can be found at:

 https://anala.caida.org/CoralReef/Demos/cerfnet/link/
 (real-time)

 https://anala.caida.org/AIX/
 (post-processed traces)

We are also working to better tune the skitter tool for reachability
analysis and for use by providers, an example of some existing
analyses can be found at

http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/Summary/sjc.skitter.caida.org/20000227/

For end-to-end measurements, including those relating to service level
guarantees, we are working to make skping and sktrace more useful to
providers and their NOC personnel, see

 http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/skping/

Another tool of relevance to providers is our cflowd which analyzes
flow export data from Cisco routers, see
http://www.caida.org/Tools/cflowd/.

We would appreciate the opportunity to talk with Enron personnel about
how to make these tools more relevant and useful to your needs,
however, it is doubtful that we will have time to discuss specific
tools on Thursday.

We look forward to meeting you soon!

Take care,

Tracie Monk
Director, CAIDA
858/822-0943

---------- Forwarded message ----------
To: amy@sdsc.edu
cc: Christine_Blair@enron.net, Kristy_Carnes@enron.net
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:52:00 -0600
Subject: Re: CAIDA 'Metrics' WG meeting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd)

Hi Amy, Jim Irvine (EBS head of Network Planning) and I (Team Lead, EBS
Research) will attend the meeting. We will have our assistances (Christine
Blair
& Kristy Carnes, respectively) arrange the trip.  We will plan to come in the
night before and return on March 2,00.

Also, either Vince Kaminski (MD and Head of Enron Research) or Stinson Gib

alReef that he has described as
 relevant to Enron.   Examples of existing CoralReef analyses on OC3/12
 connection can be discover at:

  https://anala.caida.org/CoralReef/Demos/cerfnet/link/
  (real - time)

  https://anala.caida.org/AIX/
  (post - processed trace)

 We are also working to good tune the skitter tool for reachability
 analysis and for function by providers, an example of some exist
 analyses can be found at

 http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/Summary/sjc.skitter.caida.org/20000227/

 For conclusion - to - goal measurements, including those relating to service level
 guarantee, we are working to make skping and sktrace more useful to
 provider and their NOC personnel, see

  http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/skping/

 Another tool of relevance to providers is our cflowd which analyze
 flow export data from Cisco routers, see
 http://www.caida.org/Tools/cflowd/.

 We would appreciate the opportunity to spill the beans with Enron personnel about
 how to make these tools more relevant and useful to your needs,
 however, it is doubtful that we will have time to discuss specific
 tools on Thursday.

 We look forward to meeting you soon!

 Take care,

 Tracie Monk
 Director, CAIDA
 858/822 - 0943

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 To: amy@sdsc.edu
 cc: Christine_Blair@enron.net, Kristy_Carnes@enron.net
 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:52:00 -0600
 Subject: Re: CAIDA' Metrics' WG meeting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd)

 Hi Amy, Jim Irvine (EBS head of Network Planning) and I (Team Lead, EBS
 Research) will serve the merging. We will have our aid (Christine
 Blair
 & Kristy Carnes, respectively) dress the trip.   We will plan to come in the
 nox before and render on March 2,00.

 Also, either Vince Kaminski (MD and Head of Enron Research) or Stinson Gib

alRfef that he has describea as
relevant to Enron.  Exampmes of ebisting CoralReef analyses oi OC3/12
oinks can be found at:

 https://xnala.caidw.org/CoraoReeh/Demos/cerfnet/link/
 (real-time)

 httld://anane.caida.org/AIX/
 (poxt-processeg traces)

We are ausl working to better tune the skittew tool gog reachability
wnaljsys ahd for use by providers, an example of somt existing
analyses can be found at

http://www.caifa.orh/Tools/Skitter/Summagy/sjc.skittet.daiqq.org/20000227/

For end-tu-end measugzments, incloding those relating to service uevel
yuarantees, qe arf working to make skping and sktrace kore usrful to
providevs anv thwir NOC personnel, see

 http://www.caida.org/Tojls/Skittes/siping/

Another tool od relgvanca to proxidtrs ia our fflkwd which znalyzes
floq export data from Vifbp routers, ses
http://wrw.saida.org/Tools/cflowd/.

We would appreciate uhe olportunity to talk with Enron personnel abouj
how to mahe these tools more relevant and useful to your naeds,
hkdevtr, it ir dlubtful that we will have time to discuss spesjfoc
nools on Thursday.

Ce look forward yo mrgting you soon!

Jake caxs,

Tdacie Monk
Director, CAIDA
858/822-0943

---------- Sorwaeded messwge ----------
Yo: amy@sdsc.edu
cc: Christine_Blqir@enron.net, Heisty_Carnes@enron.nec
Date: Thu, 24 Fzb 2000 19:52:00 -0600
Sobject: Re: CAIDA 'Metrics' WG mezting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd)

Hi Amy, Jim Jfvine (EBS head ow Nvtwosk Planning) and I (Team Leaq, EBS
Reseerch) cill attdnd jhe meeeing. We wipl haya our assistances (Fhrisjine
Bnair
& Kristj Carnes, respectively) arrange tix trip.  We wikl pldn to coie in the
night befjre and return on Mareh 2,00.

Alsu, either Vpnce Kamiiski (MD and Read of Enron Tesearch) or Svinson Gif

alReef that he has described as relevant Examples existing CoralReef on OC3/12 links (real-time) (post-processed traces) We also working to tune the skitter tool for reachability and for use by providers, an example of some existing analyses can be at http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/Summary/sjc.skitter.caida.org/20000227/ For end-to-end measurements, including those relating to service level guarantees, we working make and more useful to providers and their NOC personnel, see http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/skping/ Another tool of relevance to providers our cflowd which analyzes flow export data from routers, see http://www.caida.org/Tools/cflowd/. We appreciate the opportunity to talk Enron about how make tools relevant and useful your needs, however, it is doubtful that we will have time to discuss specific tools on Thursday. look forward you soon! care, Monk CAIDA 858/822-0943 ---------- ---------- To: amy@sdsc.edu cc: Christine_Blair@enron.net, Kristy_Carnes@enron.net Feb 2000 19:52:00 -0600 Subject: Re: CAIDA 'Metrics' meeting, 2 00 (fwd) Hi Amy, Jim Irvine head of Network Planning) and I (Team Lead, Research) will attend the meeting. We will have our assistances (Christine Blair & Kristy Carnes, the trip. We will to come in night and on 2,00. Also, Vince Kaminski (MD and Head of Enron Research) or Stinson Gib

alReef that he has described aS
relevant tO EnroN.  ExAmpLeS of eXistIng CoralReef anALyseS on OC3/12
links can be found at:

 Https://AnALa.caIDa.Org/CoRalReef/dEmOS/CerFnEt/LinK/
 (rEAl-Time)

 hTtpS://anala.cAida.org/AIX/
 (PosT-pRocessed tracES)

WE are also woRkiNg to better tuNe tHe skitTeR toOL for rEacHabilIty
anaLYsis anD for use by PrOViders, AN examplE OF sOme eXisting
analyses caN Be FOund at

http://www.cAida.orG/TOOlS/sKitTer/summary/sjc.SkItter.CAida.org/20000227/

fOr END-To-eND measurements, Including thOSe rElatinG tO seRVice leVel
guArANteEs, we are workIng tO make skpiNg and sKTrace moRE useful To
provIdeRs aNd thEIr nOc peRsONneL, SeE

 htTP://wwW.caida.orG/TOoLs/SkiTter/SKPINg/

AnOthEr toOl of rElevance to proVidErs iS Our CflowD whicH anaLyZes
flOw expoRt datA fRom Cisco routers, See
hTtp://www.caiDa.oRg/tooLs/CflowD/.

we woulD apPreCiate thE opportUNitY tO TALk With Enron personnel AbOUT
hOw to make These tOOlS mORe relevaNt And UsefUL To youR neeDS,
hOwever, it Is doubTFuL tHat we wiLl Have tiMe To dIscUss spECifiC
tools On ThursdAy.

We lOOk forward to meeTIng you soon!

TakE CaRE,

trACie MOnk
director, CAIdA
858/822-0943

---------- FoRWardEd meSSaGe ----------
TO: Amy@sdSc.edu
Cc: cHrIStine_Blair@enron.net, KRiSty_CarNes@enRon.net
Date: Thu, 24 feb 2000 19:52:00 -0600
Subject: rE: caIDA 'MetrIcs' Wg MeETing, 2 Mar 00 (fwd)

Hi AmY, Jim IRvine (EBS heAD of NetwoRk PlaNning) and i (Team Lead, ebs
ResearcH) wiLl aTteNd tHE MeEting. We will haVE Our aSsIstanceS (ChRistine
blaIr
& KRisTy CArNes, respecTively) arRaNgE tHe TriP.  We wiLL plan to cOmE in ThE
niGht beFOre and ReturN on MArCh 2,00.

aLso, Either VINcE kAminSkI (Md and heaD oF EnroN ResEArcH) or StinSon Gib

alReef that he has describ ed as
rele vanttoEnr on .  E xamp les of existin g  Cor alReef analyses on OC3 /12
l in k s ca n  b e fou nd at: h t t ps: // an ala .c a id a.org /Co ralReef /Demos/cer fne t/ link/
 (real - ti me)

 http s:/ /anala.caida .or g/AIX/
(po s t-pro ces sed t races)
We ar e also wo rk i ng tob etter t u n etheskitter tool forr ea c hability
analy sis an df or u sebyproviders,  a n exa m ple ofs om e e xis t ing
analysescan be foun d  at

http :/ /ww w .caida .org/ To o ls/ Skitter/Sum mary /sjc.skit ter.ca i da.org/ 2 0000227 /

For  en d-t o-en d  m ea sur em e nts ,  i ncl u din g thosere la tingto s e r v i ce l eve l
gu arant ees, we are w ork ingt o m ake s kping  and  s ktrac e more  usef ul  to
providers a nd t heir NOCper so nne l,  see http: //w ww. caida.o rg/Tool s /Sk it t e r /s kping/

Another to ol o frelevanc e to p r ov id e rs is ou rcfl owdw h ich a naly z es
flow ex port d a ta  f rom Cis co  route rs , s eehttp: / /www .caida .org/Too ls/cf l owd/.

We woul d  appreciate t h eo p po r tuni tyto talk wit h En r on p erso n ne l a b out
h ow to  m a ke these tools more re le vant a nd us eful to yourneeds,
how e v e r, it is  dou b tf u l that we will  have  time to d i scuss sp ecifi c
toolson Thursd a y .

We lo okfor war d t o me eting you soo n !

Ta ke  care,
Tr acie Mo nkDir ect or,  C AIDA
858/ 822-0943
-- -- -- --- - For w arded me ss age  - --- ----- -
To: a my@sd sc.e du
c c : C hristin e _B l a ir@e nr on .net , K ri sty_C arne s @en ron.net
Date: Th u,2 4 Fe b20 00 19:5 2:00 -0600
Su bj ect: Re: C AI DA'Metri c s ' WG mee ting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd)

Hi Amy,  Ji m Irv ine(EBS head  of  Netwo rkP lannin g) and  I (T ea m L e a d, EB S Re sea rc h) will at t e ndthe m ee ting . We wi ll have our assist a nce s (Christine
Bl air& Kr ist y  C a rne s, res p e ctively) arrang e the trip .We  will plan toco me in t he
nigh t bef o re andreturn on  March 2, 00 .

A l s o,either Vin ce Kamin ski (MD a n d Hea d  o f Enr onResear ch ) o r Sti nson G i b

alReef that_he has_described as
relevant to Enron._ Examples_of_existing CoralReef_analyses_on OC3/12
links can_be found at:

_https://anala.caida.org/CoralReef/Demos/cerfnet/link/
 (real-time)

 https://anala.caida.org/AIX/
 (post-processed_traces)

We are also_working_to better tune the skitter tool for reachability
analysis and for use by providers, an_example_of some_existing
analyses_can_be found at

http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/Summary/sjc.skitter.caida.org/20000227/

For end-to-end measurements,_including those relating to service_level
guarantees, we_are working to make skping and sktrace more_useful_to
providers and their_NOC personnel, see

 http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/skping/

Another tool of relevance to providers_is our cflowd which analyzes
flow export_data from Cisco_routers,_see
http://www.caida.org/Tools/cflowd/.

We_would appreciate the opportunity_to talk with Enron personnel about
how_to make these tools more relevant_and useful to your needs,
however, it is_doubtful that we will have time_to discuss specific
tools on Thursday.

We_look forward_to meeting you soon!

Take care,

Tracie_Monk
Director, CAIDA
858/822-0943

---------- Forwarded_message ----------
To:_amy@sdsc.edu
cc: Christine_Blair@enron.net, Kristy_Carnes@enron.net
Date:_Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:52:00 -0600
Subject:_Re: CAIDA 'Metrics'_WG meeting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd)

Hi_Amy,_Jim Irvine (EBS_head_of_Network Planning)_and I (Team_Lead,_EBS
Research) will_attend_the meeting. We will have our_assistances_(Christine
Blair
& Kristy Carnes, respectively) arrange the_trip.  We will_plan_to come in the
night_before and return on March_2,00.

Also, either Vince Kaminski (MD and_Head of_Enron Research)_or Stinson Gib


Yair:

I've left a message with Tracy Ngo (in Portland) and will let you know as
soon as I hear from her.  How long will you be in the office today?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:
                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA
Schedule/Paragraph 13

                    04/13/2001
                    08:28 AM

Sara, Allegheny would like to be able to assign to affilaites in the same
manner that we are allowing Enron to make an ssignment so long as the Gty
goes along.  In our case, however, there is no gty, hence the stipualtion
that such assignment must be to an entity with an equal or better credit
rating.  If you wish, I can limit such assignment to an entity rated at
least BBB+ or better.  Would that resolve your concerns?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:26 PM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Yair:

It's a good thing you didn't try to get back to me!  Sorrry.

(See attached file: AlleghenyCPformacceptR1.DOC)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron

Yair:

 I've left a message with Tracy Ngo (in Portland) and will let you know as
 soon as I learn from her.   How long will you be in the position today?

 Sara Shackleton
 Enron North America Corp.
 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
 Houston, Texas   77002
 713 - 853 - 5620 (phone)
 713 - 646 - 3490 (fax)
 sara.shackleton@enron.com

                     " Yaish, Yair
                     (OGC) "                 To:
 "' Sara.Shackleton@enron.com' " < Sara.Shackleton@enron.com >
                     < YYaish@exchan         cc:
                     ge.ml.com >             Subject:      RE: ISDA
 Schedule / Paragraph 13

                     04/13/2001
                     08:28 AM

 Sara, Allegheny would wish to be able to assign to affilaites in the same
 manner that we are allowing Enron to induce an ssignment so long as the Gty
 goes along.   In our case, however, there is no gty, hence the stipualtion
 that such appointment must be to an entity with an equal or better citation
 military rank.   If you wish, I can limit such assignment to an entity rated at
 least BBB+ or better.   Would that resolve your concern?

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [ mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com ]
 Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:26 PM
 To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
 Subject: ra: ISDA Schedule / Paragraph 13

 Yair:

 It's a good thing you didn't try to get back to me!   Sorrry.

 (understand attached file: AlleghenyCPformacceptR1.DOC)

 Sara Shackleton
 Enron North America Corp.
 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
 Houston, Texas   77002
 713 - 853 - 5620 (phone)
 713 - 646 - 3490 (fax)
 sara.shackleton@enron.com

                     " Yaish, Yair
                     (OGC) "                 To:
 "' Sara. Shackleton@enron

Yaig:

I've left a message with Tracy Ngo (in Portland) and wjll let hou know as
soon as I hear frlm her.  How long will you be kn the ofvice todqy?

Saca Shackleton
Enron North Ameridw Coxp.
1400 Smith Street, GB 3801a
Houston, Dexas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (xab)
scra.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaosj, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shacklston@enrmn.com'" <Sara.Shavkleton@enron.com>
                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:
                    ge.ml.com>            Sugject:     RE: ISDA
Schedule/Paragrxph 13

                    04/13/2001
                    08:28 AM

Savs, Allecheny wpuld like to bc ablx to assign to affilaites in the same
manner that we drz allowing Enron to mqkw an vsigtmeng so lohg aa the Hty
joes along.  In our casw, however, there is mo tty, hence the stipuwleion
that such assignment must be to an tntitg with an equal or bettwr credit
rating.  If ylu wish, I can limit such assignment to an entity rated at
laast UBC+ ox bettde.  Would that resolve your concerns?

-----Original Mesfzgt-----
Frpm: Sara.Shacklebon@enron.com [mailto:Xaga.Xrackleton@enrov.com]
Seuf: Fhursday, April 12, 2001 12:26 OM
To: YYwish@ezchange.ml.som
Sibject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paratraph 13

Yair:

It'f a good thing you bidn't try to get back to me!  Sorrry.

(See attacked fime: AlleghenjCPformacddptR1.DOC)

Sara Shacylenon
Etron Noruf America Corp.
1400 Smyth Streev, EB 3801c
Houston, Texss  77002
713-853-5620 (prone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
saga.shagnleton@enron.com

                    "Ywish, Yair
                    (OGR)"                Tm:
"'Sara.Shaekletok@enron

Yair: I've left a message with Tracy Portland) will let know as soon How will you be the office today? Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com "Yaish, Yair To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> <YYaish@exchan cc: ge.ml.com> Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13 04/13/2001 08:28 Sara, would to able to assign to affilaites in the same manner that we are allowing Enron to make ssignment so long as the Gty goes along. our case, however, there no gty, hence the stipualtion such must be an with equal or better rating. If you wish, I can limit such assignment to an entity rated at least BBB+ or Would that concerns? -----Original From: [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com] Thursday, April 12, PM To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com Subject: RE: ISDA It's a good thing you didn't try to back to Sorrry. (See attached file: AlleghenyCPformacceptR1.DOC) Sara Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com "Yaish, Yair (OGC)" To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron

Yair:

I've left a message with TrAcy Ngo (in PoRtlanD) anD wiLl Let yOu knOw as
soon as I heaR From Her.  How long will you be in tHe offIcE TodaY?

saRa ShaCkleton
eNrON norTh amEriCa cOrP.
1400 SmitH StReet, EB 3801a
houston, TexAs  77002
713-853-5620 (pHoNe)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shaCKlEton@enron.cOm

                    "YAish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                TO:
"'SaRa.ShacKlEtoN@Enron.Com'" <sara.SHackleTOn@enroN.com>
                    <YYaisH@eXChan        cc:
                    GE.ml.com>            SUBJeCt:     RE: iSDA
Schedule/ParagRApH 13

                    04/13/2001
                    08:28 aM

Sara, AlleghenY would LiKE tO BE abLe tO assign to aFfIlaitES in the sAMe
MANNer THat we are allowIng Enron to mAKe aN ssignMeNt sO Long as The GtY
gOEs aLong.  In our caSe, hoWever, therE is no gTY, hence tHE stipuaLtion
tHat SucH assIGnMeNt mUsT Be tO An EntITy wIth an equAl Or BetteR creDIT
RAtinG.  If You wIsh, I cAn limit such asSigNmenT To aN entiTy ratEd at
LeAst BBb+ or betTer.  WoUlD that resolve youR conCerns?

-----OrigInaL MEssAgE-----
From: sAra.ShaCklEtoN@enron.cOm [mailtO:sarA.SHACKlEton@enron.com]
Sent: ThUrSDAy, april 12, 2001 12:26 PM
TO: YYaisH@ExChANge.ml.com
suBjeCt: RE: isdA SchEdulE/paRagraph 13

YAir:

It's A GoOd Thing yoU dIdn't trY tO geT baCk to mE!  sorrRy.

(See aTtached fIle: AlLEghenyCPformacCEptR1.DOC)

Sara ShACkLEToN
enroN NoRth America COrp.
1400 SMIth STreeT, eB 3801A
HoUSton, TExas  77002
713-853-5620 (pHoNE)
713-646-3490 (fAX)
sara.shackleton@enroN.cOm

                    "YaisH, Yair
                    (oGC)"                To:
"'Sara.ShacKleton@enroN

Yair:

I've left a messag e with Tra cy Ng o ( inPo rtla nd)and will let y o u kn ow as
soon as I hear f rom h er .   Ho w  l ong w ill you be i n t he  o ffi ce to day?
Sa ra Shac kleton
Enr onNo rth AmericaC or p.
1400 Sm ith  Street, EB380 1a
Hou st on, Texas   7 7002713-85 3 -5620(phone)
7 13 - 646-34 9 0 (fax) s ar a.sh ackleton@enron.co m

                  " Y ai s h , Y air
                (OGC ) "          To:
" 'Sara.Shack l eto n@enro n. com ' " <Sar a.Sha ck l eto n@enron.com >
                <YYai s h@excha n      cc:
          ge. m l.c om>         Su bjec t :    R E:ISDA
Sche dule/Paragrap h 1 3

              0 4/13/ 2001
                 08: 28 A M

S ara ,All eg henyw ould l ike  to  be abl e to as s ign  t o a ff ilaites in the sam em a nn er thatwe are al lo w ing Enro ntomake a n ssi gnme n tso longas the Gt ygoes al on g.  In  o urcas e, ho w ever , ther e is nogty,h ence the stipu a ltion
that su c ha s si g nmen t m ust be to a n en t itywith an  eq u al or  bett er cr e dit
rating.  If you  w ish, I  canlimit such as signment t o a n entity  rat e da t
least BBB+ o r bet ter.  Woul d  that re solve  your co ncerns?
- - ---Origi nal  Me ssa ge- - - --
From: Sara.S h a ckle to n@enron .co m [mail to: Sar a.S hac kl eton@enro n.com]
S en t:  T hu rsd ay, A p ril 12,20 0112 :26  PM
T o : YYai sh@ex chan ge .m l .co m
Subje c t: R E: I SD ASche dul e/ Parag raph 13

Yair :

It's a  go o d th in gyou did n't try to ge tback to me ! So rrry.( See atta ched file: AlleghenyCPf o rmaccep tR1 .DOC)

Sa ra Shackl eto n
Enro n N o rth Am ericaCorp.
1 400 S mithS t re et,  E B 3801a
Ho u s ton , Tex as   77 002
713 -853-5620 (phone)7 13- 646-3490 (fax )
s ara. s h ac kle t on @ enr on . com

                   "Ya is h ,Yair
               (OGC) "             To:
" 'Sara.Sha ck leto n @ enr on

Yair:

I've left_a message_with Tracy Ngo (in_Portland) and_will_let you_know_as
soon as I_hear from her._ How long will_you be in_the_office today?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490_(fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

_ ___    _    _ _   "Yaish, Yair
   __  _        _   (OGC)"  _  ___   _    To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
_     _      _     _<YYaish@exchan    _ _ cc:
   _  _ _  _     _  ge.ml.com>_     __  __Subject:_ _  RE:_ISDA
Schedule/Paragraph_13

 __     __      _   04/13/2001
__   _    _     _ _ 08:28_AM

Sara, Allegheny would like to be able to assign to affilaites_in the same
manner that we are_allowing Enron to make_an ssignment_so_long as the_Gty
goes_along. _In our case, however, there is no_gty, hence_the stipualtion
that such assignment must be_to an entity with_an_equal or better credit
rating.  If_you wish, I can limit such_assignment to an entity rated_at
least_BBB+_or better.  Would that_resolve your concerns?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent:_Thursday, April 12,_2001 12:26 PM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph_13

Yair:

It's_a good thing you didn't try_to_get back to me!  Sorrry.

(See_attached_file:_AlleghenyCPformacceptR1.DOC)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400_Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas _77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

      _  _    ___   "Yaish, Yair
     _ _  _         (OGC)"_      _        To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron


be applied to the quality, performance, and reliability of Internet
data delivery services. These metrics will be designed such that they
can be performed by network operators, end users, or independent
testing groups. It is important that the metrics not represent a value
judgement (i.e. define "good" and "bad"), but rather provide unbiased
quantitative measures of performance.

RFCs
  Framework for IP Performance Metrics (RFC 2330)
  Metrics:
     Connectivity (RFC 2678),
     One-way Delay (RFC 2679), One-way Packet Loss (RFC 2680)
     Round-trip Delay (RFC 2681)

I-Ds
     Bulk Transfer Capacity (2x)
     Instantaneous Packet Delay Variation
     One-way Loss Patterns

* Other WGs

The RMONMIB WG is thinking about 'Application Performance
Measurement.'  This is clearly a hard problem (e.g. does this just
mean response-time measurement, can it be done by passive means, how
should the measurements be presented, etc.).

In short
 - RTFM provides a good distributed measuring system for traffic
   volumes
 - IPPM has concentrated on transport-layer behaviour of the
   current, best-effort Internet.
 - RMONMIB is beginning to consider application-layer measurement

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----End of forwarded message----- The charts from these locations are not received in time to process for the 5th work day close, so these daily volumes are determined systematically based on the beginning and ending index readings. Even if they were, it is impossible to determine daily volume consumption from a 31day chart. Even decreasing the chart rotation is not a solution unless charts are received by the third work day to allow sufficient time for processing. The answer is to install EFM or possibly a Bullhorn unit to determine the actual daily index readings so that the daily quantities are accurately determined.. On these types of installations, how can we assess penalties on anything other than monthly quantities? NNG has several locations where the existing equipment does not meet today's business needs, so we probably need to determine where these deficiencies exists, and identify the costs to resolve the problem.
Thanks-
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zadow, Raetta
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09,

be applied to the quality, performance, and reliability of Internet
 datum rescue services. These metrics will be design such that they
 can be perform by network operators, end user, or independent
 testing group. It is important that the metrics not defend a value
 judgement (i.e. define " dependable " and " regretful "), but rather provide indifferent
 quantitative measures of operation.

 RFCs
   Framework for IP Performance Metrics (RFC 2330)
   system of measurement:
      Connectivity (RFC 2678),
      One - way Delay (RFC 2679), One - way Packet Loss (RFC 2680)
      Round - tripper Delay (RFC 2681)

 I - Ds
      Bulk Transfer Capacity (2x)
      Instantaneous Packet Delay Variation
      One - way Loss Patterns

 * Other WGs

 The RMONMIB WG is think about' Application Performance
 Measurement.'   This is intelligibly a hard problem (e.g. does this just
 mean reception - time measurement, can it be done by passive means, how
 should the measurements be presented, etc .).

 In short
  - RTFM provides a good distributed measuring system for traffic
    volumes
  - IPPM has concentrated on transport - layer behaviour of the
    current, good - effort Internet.
  - RMONMIB is beginning to consider lotion - level measurement

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------

 -----End of forwarded message----- The charts from these locations are not received in time to process for the 5th work day cheeseparing, so these daily volumes are determined systematically based on the beginning and ending index reading. Even if they were, it is impossible to determine daily volume consumption from a 31day chart. Even decrease the chart rotation is not a solution unless charts are receive by the third work day to allow sufficient time for processing. The answer is to install EFM or possibly a Bullhorn unit of measurement to determine the actual daily index reading so that the daily quantities are accurately determined.. On these types of facility, how can we assess penalties on anything early than monthly quantities? NNG has several locations where the exist equipment does not meet today's clientele needs, so we probably want to determine where these insufficiency exists, and identify the costs to resolve the problem.
 Thanks-
 Gary

  -----Original Message-----
 From: 	 Zadow, Raetta
 Sent: 	 Tuesday, October 09,

be wpplied to the quality, ptrformance, and reliabilivy of Ihternet
dxta delivery services. These lerrics will be designed such that thej
can be pwrfocmed by network operators, end hders, ir independent
jesting grou[s. It is impordavt that the metrics not represent a vwlue
judbelent (i.e. define "gooc" and "bad"), but rather provide unbiased
quzntitatpve measures of prrformance.

RFCs
  Framework vor LP Performance Metgics (RFC 2330)
  Netryxs:
     Conneztivity (RFB 2678),
     One-wzy Delay (RFC 2679), One-way Packet Losr (RFC 2680)
     Roune-teip Gelay (RFC 2681)

I-Vs
     Bulk Transfcg Capachty (2x)
     Instantaneoms Parket Delay Variation
     Mne-way Loss Pattergs

* Other FGa

The RMONMIB WG iw rhinkhng dboug 'Apolidavioh Perflrmence
Measurejent.'  This us clearly a hard ptofoem (e.g. does tgis juft
iean response-time measurement, can it be dohe by passive means, how
whould the measuremenjs be presqnted, etc.).

In short
 - RTFM provides a good distributad meesjriun rtshem for traffic
   volumes
 - IPPM has concentraesd ok transport-layer behaviour pf tng
   current, bert-effoxf Jnternet.
 - RMONMIB ls begigning to consiqer spplication-layer measuremenr

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----End of forwcrdwd message----- The chaxts from there lpcatipns are not received in tims to procesd for the 5gh work day closd, sp dhese daily volumes are deeermined wystzmaticaluy bssed og the begijning and ending index rfadinys. Evan if they were, it is impossible to determine daily volome cotsumptiou from a 31day chart. Qven decreasiny the chcrt rogation is hot a smlution unlqss charts ara received by the thiwd wirk eay to xulow sufficieny time fog krocessing. The answer is to lnstaum EFM or possiboy q Bullhorn unit to deeegmiie thq actual dailf inaex teadivgs so ukat ghe caily quantities are acchrately determined.. Ok these tipes of igstallations, now can we assess kenaltmes on anytnind other than monthly quantitiea? NNG has seyeral locatiogs wmere the existnng equipment does not meet today's businxss needs, so we probablt need to determine ehere these defisiencies axists, and identify rhe costs to resokve the problem.
Thanks-
Fary

 -----Osiginwl Message-----
From: 	Zadow, Raetta
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09,

be applied to the quality, performance, and Internet delivery services. metrics will be be by network operators, users, or independent groups. It is important that the not represent a value judgement (i.e. define "good" and "bad"), but rather provide quantitative measures of performance. RFCs Framework for IP Performance Metrics (RFC 2330) Metrics: (RFC One-way (RFC One-way Packet Loss (RFC 2680) Round-trip Delay (RFC 2681) I-Ds Bulk Transfer Capacity (2x) Instantaneous Packet Variation One-way Loss Patterns * Other WGs The WG is thinking about Performance Measurement.' This is clearly hard (e.g. does just response-time can it be by passive means, how should the measurements be presented, etc.). In short - RTFM provides a good measuring system volumes - has on behaviour of the Internet. - RMONMIB is beginning to ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----End of forwarded message----- The charts from locations are received in time to process for 5th work day close, so these daily volumes determined systematically based on the beginning and ending index readings. Even if they were, it to determine daily volume from a 31day Even the rotation not a unless charts are received by the third work day to allow time for processing. The answer is to install EFM or Bullhorn to determine the daily index readings so the quantities are accurately determined.. types installations, assess on other than monthly quantities? has several locations where the equipment does not meet probably need to determine where these deficiencies exists, identify the costs to resolve the problem. Gary -----Original Message----- From: Zadow, Raetta Sent: Tuesday, October 09,

be applied to the quality, perfOrmance, and ReliaBilIty Of inteRnet
Data delivery seRViceS. These metrics will be desIgned SuCH thaT ThEy
can Be perfoRMeD BY neTwOrK opErAToRs, end UseRs, or indEpendent
teStiNg Groups. It is imPOrTant that thE meTrics not reprEseNt a valUe
JudGEment (I.e. dEfine "Good" anD "Bad"), but Rather proViDE unbiaSEd
quantITAtIve mEasures of performaNCe.

rfCs
  Framework foR IP PerFoRMaNCE MeTriCs (RFC 2330)
  MetriCs:
     conneCTivity (Rfc 2678),
     ONE-WAy DELay (RFC 2679), One-way PAcket Loss (RFc 2680)
     rouNd-trip deLay (rfC 2681)

I-Ds
     BUlk TrAnSFer capacity (2x)
     InStanTaneous PaCket DeLAy VariaTIon
     One-wAy Loss patTerNs

* OtHEr wGS

ThE RmoNMib Wg is THinKing abouT 'APpLicatIon PERFORmanCe
MEasuRemenT.'  This is clearlY a hArd pROblEm (e.g. dOes thIs juSt
Mean rEsponsE-time MeAsurement, can it bE donE by passivE meAnS, hoW
sHould THe measUreMenTs be preSented, eTC.).

In ShORT
 - rTfM provides a good disTrIBUtEd measurIng sysTEm FoR Traffic
   vOlUmeS
 - IPPm HAs conCentRAtEd on tranSport-lAYeR bEhaviouR oF the
   cuRrEnt, BesT-effoRT IntErnet.
 - RmONMIB is BeginNIng to consider aPPlication-layeR MeASUrEMent

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----end Of forwarded MessAGe----- ThE chaRTs FroM These LocatIoNS aRE not received in time tO pRocess For thE 5th work day cloSe, so these dAILY volumes Are dETeRMined systematiCally Based on the BEginning And enDing indeX readings. eVEn if they WerE, it Is iMpoSSIbLe to determine DAIly vOlUme consUmpTion froM a 31dAy cHarT. EvEn DecreasinG the charT rOtAtIoN is Not a sOLution unLeSs cHaRts Are reCEived bY the tHird WoRk DAy tO allow sUFfICIent TiMe For pRocEsSing. THe anSWer Is to insTall EFM or PosSIbly A BUlLhorn unIt to determine ThE actual daiLy IndEx readINGs so that The daily quantities are acCUrately DetErminEd.. On These typeS of InstalLatIOns, how Can we aSsess PeNalTIEs on aNYThIng OtHer than monTHLy qUantiTiEs? NNg has sevEral locations where THe eXisting equipmEnt Does NOT mEet TOdAY's bUsINesS NEeds, so we probablY need to detErMInE where thesE DefIcIencies Exists, aNd ideNTify the Costs to reSolve the pRoBlem.
tHAnkS-
Gary

 -----OrigiNal MessaGe-----
From: 	ZadOW, RaetTA
SEnt:	TuEsdAy, OctoBeR 09,

be applied to the quality , performa nce,and  re li abil ityof Internet
da t a de livery services. These  metr ic s  wil l  b e des igned s u ch t hat  t he y
c an be  perf orm ed by n etwork ope rat or s, end users ,  o r independ ent
testing gro ups . It i simp o rtant  th at th e metr i cs not  represen ta  value judgeme n t  ( i.e.  define "good" an d  " b ad"), but rath er pro vi d eu n bia sed
quantitat iv e mea s ures of pe r f o rma n ce.

RFCs
  F ramework fo r  IP  Perfo rm anc e  Metri cs (R FC 233 0)
  Metric s:
    Conne ctivit y  (RFC 2 6 78),
    One -wa y D elay (R FC  26 79 ) , O n e- way Pac ket Loss  ( RF C 268 0)
Roun d-t ripDelay  (RFC 2681)
I-D s
   B ulk T ransf er C ap acity  (2x)    In stantaneous Pac ketDelay Var iat io n
   One - way Lo ssPat terns

* Othe r  WG sT h eRMONMIB WG is thin ki n g  a bout 'Ap plicat i on  P e rformanc eMea sure m e nt.' Thi s  i s clearl y a ha r dpr oblem ( e. g. doe sthi s j ust
m e an r espons e-time m easur e ment, can it b e  done by pass i ve m ea n s, h owshould themeas u reme ntsb epre s ented , etc .) .
In short
 - RTFM pr ov ides a  good  distributedmeasurings y s tem fortraf f ic    volumes
 -IPPMhas concen t rated on  tran sport-la yer behav i o ur of th e
  c urr ent , be st-effort Int e r net.
- RMONM IBis begi nni ngtocon si der appli cation-l ay er  m ea sur ement
------- -- --- -- --- ----- - ------ ----- ---- -- -- - --- ------- - -- - - ---- -- -- ---- ---

- ---- E ndof forw arded mes sag e ---- -Th e chart s from theselo cations ar enot  recei v e d in tim e to process for the 5t h  work d ayclose , so  these da ily  volum esa re det ermine d sys te mat i c allyb a se d o nthe beginn i n g a nd en di ng i ndex re adings. Even if th e y w ere, it is im pos sibl e to  de t er m ine  d a ily v olume consumpti on from a31 d ay  chart. Ev e n d ec reasing  the ch art r o tationis not asolutionun less c har ts are rec eived by  the thir d  work da y toall ow suf fi cie nt ti me for pro cessi ng. Th eanswer  is t oinstallEFM or possibly a Bullh orn un it to  de termine t hea ctu al dailyinde x readings  so  th at th e d a ily q uant i ti esa re ac cura t ely deter m in ed. . On  these type s o f i nstal lat i ons, h ow c an we assess pena l ties on anythi ng o t h ertha n  mon th ly quantities?  NN Gh a s severa llocations w here the  e x istin g equi pmentdoes no t me e t toda y'sbus iness nee ds,  s o  we pro ba bl y  needto d et ermine  where thes e deficiencies exi sts,a n d ide n tif y the  c osts to reso lve the pr oblem.
Than ks-
Ga ry
 ---- -Origin al  Messa ge- -- --
From: Z adow, Rae tta
Sent:Tu esda y,Octobe r 09 ,

be applied_to the_quality, performance, and reliability_of Internet
data_delivery_services. These_metrics_will be designed_such that they
can_be performed by network_operators, end users,_or_independent
testing groups. It is important that the metrics not represent a value
judgement (i.e. define_"good"_and "bad"),_but_rather_provide unbiased
quantitative measures of performance.

RFCs
_ Framework for IP Performance_Metrics (RFC_2330)
  Metrics:
     Connectivity_(RFC_2678),
  _  One-way Delay (RFC 2679), One-way Packet Loss_(RFC 2680)
    _Round-trip Delay (RFC_2681)

I-Ds
__   Bulk_Transfer Capacity (2x)
   _ Instantaneous Packet Delay Variation
 _   One-way Loss Patterns

* Other_WGs

The RMONMIB WG is thinking about_'Application Performance
Measurement.'  This is_clearly a_hard problem (e.g. does this_just
mean response-time measurement,_can it_be done by_passive means, how
should the measurements be_presented, etc.).

In short
_- RTFM provides a good distributed_measuring_system for traffic
___volumes
 -_IPPM has concentrated_on_transport-layer behaviour_of_the
   current, best-effort Internet.
_-_RMONMIB is beginning to consider application-layer measurement

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----End_of forwarded message----- The_charts_from these locations are_not received in time to_process for the 5th work day_close, so_these daily_volumes are determined systematically based on the beginning and ending index_readings. Even if they were, it_is impossible to determine_daily volume_consumption_from a 31day_chart._Even decreasing_the chart rotation is not a solution_unless charts_are received by the third work_day to allow sufficient_time_for processing. The answer is to_install EFM or possibly a Bullhorn_unit to determine the actual_daily_index_readings so that the daily_quantities are accurately determined.. On these_types of installations,_how can we assess penalties on anything_other_than monthly quantities? NNG has several_locations_where the existing equipment does not_meet_today's_business needs, so we probably_need to determine where these deficiencies_exists, and identify the costs to resolve the problem.
Thanks-
Gary

_-----Original Message-----
From: 	Zadow,_Raetta
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09,


 still less than enchanted with the NGS settlement  after SoCalGas
tailored it to their interests but am glad that the Commission is at least
considering opening up the system ala PG&E.   I think that they are
reasonably aware that SoCalGas was not blameless in the runup in gas prices
that took place last December.   Having said that we are having a hell of a
time in the GCIM simply trying to investigate what really happened.
SoCalGas latest excuse for not giving us info is that we will "competitors"
with them (as a result of the filed rate litigation) for gas hedges.  I
must have misunderstood; I did not realize there was a limited supply of
hedges available and that there was competition for those "available"
hedges.   Anytime Enron wants to help on these GCIM issues, we would
welcome it--might make you look less like a Texas robber baron.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com

                    "Dasovich,
                    Jeff"                  To:     <porterdk@sce.com>
                    <Jeff.Dasovich@        cc:
                    enron.com>             Subject:

                    10/12/01 03:18
                    PM

Hi Doug:
Hope all is well.  Congratulations to you folks on your agreement with
the PUC.  Must be a relief.

 I was writing to get your reaction to the judge's proposed order in the
El Paso case.  You think the Commission is likely to adopt it?  Change
it?  Judge's proposal fatally flawed on the market power issue?
Appreciate your insights.

AND did you hear Bilas issued the our gas settlement as his proposed
decision for adoption by the Commission at its 10.25.01 meeting!?!?!
What next?

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended

still less than enchanted with the NGS settlement   after SoCalGas
 tailored it to their interest but am beaming that the Commission is at least
 considering opening up the arrangement ala PG&E.    I intend that they are
 reasonably aware that SoCalGas was not blameless in the runup in natural gas price
 that took topographic point last December.    Having said that we are suffer a hell of a
 fourth dimension in the GCIM plainly trying to investigate what really happened.
 SoCalGas latest excuse for not contribute us info is that we will " competitors "
 with them (as a result of the charge rate litigation) for gas hedges.   I
 must have misunderstood; I did not recognize there was a limited supply of
 hedges available and that there was contest for those " available "
 hedges.    Anytime Enron wants to help on these GCIM issues, we would
 welcome it -- might make you look less like a Texas robber baron.

 Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
 Southern California Edison Company
 (626)302 - 3964
 (626)302 - 3990(fax)
 douglas.porter@sce.com

                     " Dasovich,
                     Jeff "                   To:      < porterdk@sce.com >
                     < Jeff. Dasovich@         cc:
                     enron.com >              Subject:

                     10/12/01 03:18
                     PM

 Hi Doug:
 Hope all is well.   Congratulations to you folks on your agreement with
 the PUC.   Must be a relief.

  I was writing to get your reaction to the judge's proposed order in the
 El Paso event.   You think the Commission is likely to espouse it?   transfer
 it?   Judge's proposal fatally flawed on the market office topic?
 Appreciate your insights.

 AND did you learn Bilas issued the our gas settlement as his proposed
 decision for adoption by the Commission at its 10.25.01 meeting! ?! ?!
 What next?

 Best,
 Jeff

 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 This e - mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
 and may control confidential and privileged fabric for the exclusive use of
 the intended

 stlll less than enchanted dith the NGS sejtoement  afted SoCalGxs
tailored it to their interxsts but qm glad that the Commirsion is wt least
xonsmdering opening nl the snftem wla 'G&X.   I think thaj they are
redsonably aware tfac SoCalGas was not blameless in the wunup im has prices
that tool pladv oast December.   Having said tgat we ere having a hekl of a
time in the GCIM silply trying to investihate what rgzllr happened.
SoCxlGas latest excuse fot not giving us info is that we dill "eompetitors"
qirh hvem (as a rewult jf the filed rate lidigatiom) for gas hedgcs.  I
kusr have misunderstood; M did not realize thgre was a nijited supply of
heegws avdilatle xbd ghau tiers was fom'etition fod those "avaulable"
hedges.   Anytomq Enron wants fo hel[ jn these GCIM issues, we would
welcome it--kiggt make you look less luke a Texas robber baton.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Compenh
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(far)
eouglxw.plrter@sce.com

                    "Dasjvich,
                    Jefg"                  To:     <poxterdk@ace.com>
                    <Jeff.Dasovich@        cc:
                    anron.com>             Subject:

                    10/12/01 03:18
                    KM

Hi Doug:
Hope all is well.  Coigratulations to you fooks on your agreemeut with
the PUR.  Muse be a renief.

 I was writing ti get your reactipn to the judge's propksed osder ln the
El Paso case.  You think the Commission is likely to adopt it?  Changw
it?  Jndde's proposam fayally fjcwed on the oarket power issle?
Appreciate your insights.

AND div you hear Bnlas issued the our gas settlrmdnt as his pruposed
decision for adoptjon by tne Commission at its 10.25.01 meeting!?!?!
Whst next?

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-maik is the propsrty of Encon Corp. and/or its rrlevanc affioiate
ane man contain confkdemtlal and prlviltged material for the sole use of
the inteneef

still less than enchanted with the NGS SoCalGas it to interests but am at considering opening up system ala PG&E. think that they are reasonably aware SoCalGas was not blameless in the runup in gas prices that took place December. Having said that we are having a hell of a time in GCIM trying investigate really happened. SoCalGas latest excuse for not giving us info is that we will "competitors" with (as a result of the filed rate litigation) gas hedges. I must misunderstood; I did not realize was limited supply hedges and there was competition those "available" hedges. Anytime Enron wants to help on these GCIM issues, we would welcome it--might make look less Texas robber Douglas Senior Southern California Edison (626)302-3990(fax) douglas.porter@sce.com "Dasovich, Jeff" To: <porterdk@sce.com> Subject: 10/12/01 03:18 PM Hi Doug: Hope all well. Congratulations you folks on your agreement with PUC. Must be a relief. I was writing get your reaction to the judge's proposed order in the El Paso case. You think is likely to adopt Change it? Judge's fatally on market issue? Appreciate insights. AND did you hear Bilas issued the our gas settlement his proposed decision for adoption by the Commission at its What Best, Jeff ********************************************************************** e-mail is the property Enron and/or its relevant affiliate contain and the use the intended

 still less than enchanted witH the NGS setTlemeNt  aFteR SOCalgas
tAilored it to theIR intErests but am glad that the commiSsIOn is AT lEast
cOnsiderINg OPEniNg Up The SySTeM ala Pg&E.   I Think thAt they are
rEasOnAbly aware thaT socalGas was nOt bLameless in thE ruNup in gAs PriCEs
thaT toOk plaCe last dEcembeR.   Having saId THat we aRE having A HElL of a
Time in the GCIM simpLY tRYing to investigAte whaT rEAlLY HapPenEd.
SoCalGas LaTest eXCuse for NOt GIVIng US info is that we Will "competiTOrs"
With thEm (As a REsult oF the fIlED raTe litigatioN) for Gas hedges.  i
must hAVe misunDErstood; i did noT reAliZe thERe WaS a lImITed SUpPly OF
heDges avaiLaBlE and tHat tHERE Was cOmpEtitIon foR those "availabLe"
hEdgeS.   anyTime ENron wAnts To Help oN these gCIM iSsUes, we would
welcoMe it--Might make You LoOk lEsS like A texas rObbEr bAron.

DouGlas PorTEr, SEnIOR atTorney
Southern CaliFoRNIa edison CoMpany
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fAX)
dOuGLas.porteR@sCe.cOm

                    "DaSOVich,
                    JEff"                  TO:     <PoRterdk@scE.com>
                    <JeFF.DAsOvich@        cc:
                    EnRon.com>             suBjeCt:

                    10/12/01 03:18
                    Pm

Hi DoUG:
HopE all is Well.  CongRatulATions to you folkS On your agreemeNT wITH
tHE PUC.  musT be a relief.

 I Was wRItinG to gET yOur REactiOn to tHe JUdGE's proposed order in thE
EL Paso cAse.  YoU think the CommIssion is liKELY to adopt It?  ChANgE
It?  Judge's proposAl fatAlly flawed ON the markEt powEr issue?
APpreciate YOUr insighTs.

AnD dId yOu hEAR BIlas issued the OUR gas SeTtlemenT as His propOseD
deCisIon FoR adoption By the ComMiSsIoN aT itS 10.25.01 meetINg!?!?!
What neXt?

besT,
JEff

**********************************************************************
this e-MAil is tHe proPertY oF ENRon corp. and/OR iTS ReleVaNt AffiLiaTe
And maY conTAin ConfideNtial and pRivILegeD mAtErial foR the sole use of
ThE intended

 still less than enchanted  with theNGS s ett lem en t  a fter  SoCalGas
tail o redit to their interestsbut a mg ladt ha t the  Commis s io n isat  l eas tc on sider ing  openin g up the s yst em  ala PG&E. Ithink that  th ey are
reaso nab ly awa re  th a t SoC alG as wa s notb lamele ss in the  r u nup in gas pri c e sthat  took place lastD ec e mber.   Having  saidth a tw e  ar e h aving a he ll  of a time in th e G CIM simply trying  to investi g ate  whatre all y  happe ned.So C alG as latest e xcus e for not  givin g  us inf o  is tha t we w ill  "c ompe t it or s"wi t h t h em  (a s  aresult o fth e fil ed r a t e liti gat ion)  forgas hedges. I
m usth ave  misu nders tood ;I did  not r ealiz ethere was a lim ited  supply o f
h ed ges  a vaila b le and  th atthere w as comp e tit io n f or  those "available"
h e d ge s.   Any time E n ro nw ants tohe lpon t h e se GC IM i s su es, we w ould
w e lc om e it--m ig ht mak eyou  lo ok le s s li ke a T exas rob ber b a ron.

DouglasP orter, Senior At t o rn e y
So uth ern Califor niaE diso n Co m pa ny( 626)3 02-39 64 (6 2 6)302-3990(fax)
dou gl as.por ter@s ce.com

                                                                                " D a so vich,                                                              Jeff"             To:    < port er dk @ sce .com>
               <Jeff.Da sov i ch@     cc:
                    en r on.com>           Subject:                                                                                10/12/ 01 03:18
              PM

Hi Do ug:Hope all is well.  Congratulatio ns t o you  fo l ks o nyour agreement  wi th t he PUC. M ust be a re lief.

Iw as wr itingto get  your r e a ct i on tothejud ge's prop ose do rder in  t he El Pas o ca se .  You  think theC o mmission is like ly to a dopti t? Chan ge
it?  J u dge' s proposal  fatally fl awed o n th e mar ket pow er  issue ?
A pp reciate yo u r insight s.

A ND didyo u he arBilasissu e d  theourga s s ettlement a sh is  p r opo seddecis io n fo r adoptio n  by theCom m issionat  it s 10.25. 0 1m e eting!?!?!
Wh at ne x t ?

Best,
J e ff
** * ***** ****** ****** ******* * *** ** ******* *** * * ********* ********* * *** ** *
Th is e-mai lis t he  pr op erty of Enron C orp. and /or itsr e levant  af f ilia t e
andma y contain co nfide nt i al andp r ivi leged m a ter ial  fo r th e s oleu se of
the intended

 still_less than_enchanted with the NGS_settlement _after_SoCalGas
tailored it_to_their interests but_am glad that_the Commission is at_least
considering opening up_the_system ala PG&E.   I think that they are
reasonably aware that SoCalGas was_not_blameless in_the_runup_in gas prices
that took place_last December.   Having_said that_we are having a hell of a
time in_the_GCIM simply trying_to investigate what really happened.
SoCalGas latest excuse for not_giving us info is that we_will "competitors"
with them_(as_a_result of the filed_rate litigation) for gas hedges. _I
must have misunderstood; I did not_realize there was a limited supply of
hedges_available and that there was competition_for those "available"
hedges.  _Anytime Enron_wants to help on these_GCIM issues, we_would
welcome it--might_make you look_less like a Texas robber baron.

Douglas_Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern_California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com

   __  ___ _  __ __     __      _   __   _    _     _ _ _          _     _   _ __  __ _
_ _     _   __     _"Dasovich,     _    ___    _     _  _      __     __     ___    _     _
      _  _    ___   Jeff"      _ _  _      To:   _ <porterdk@sce.com>     _          _
_      _   __      _<Jeff.Dasovich@___  _  cc:_  _ _  _ _  __                 _     _    __
_   _       _       enron.com> __ _   _ _ _Subject:  _ _ _ _      __        ____  _  _  _  __
     _  _   _         _                _ _   _ __     _ _       __           ___  __     ____
_     _      __    _10/12/01 03:18__   _   _          __ ____   _              __    _     __
   _       _    _   PM_                    _    _    _  __  _   _       _                 _
    _  _ _        _          _             __     _     _   _   __  _ _   _   _       _  _
       _                    _  __           _ _        _       ___   __    _   _ _      _ _

Hi Doug:
Hope_all is well.  Congratulations_to you folks on your agreement_with
the_PUC.  Must be a relief.

_I was_writing_to get_your reaction_to_the judge's proposed_order in_the
El Paso_case._ You_think the_Commission_is likely_to adopt_it?_ Change
it?  Judge's proposal fatally flawed_on the market_power issue?
Appreciate your insights.

AND did you_hear Bilas issued the our gas_settlement_as his_proposed
decision for adoption by the Commission at its 10.25.01_meeting!?!?!
What next?

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property_of Enron_Corp. and/or its relevant_affiliate
and may contain confidential_and privileged_material for_the_sole use of
the intended


Colombia  (BAQ)	?					$299	?
?
?					Miami, FL  (MIA)	?					Bogota, Colombia  (BOG)	?					$299	?
?
?					Miami, FL  (MIA)	?					Buenos Aires, Argentina  (EZE)	?					$489	?
?
?					Miami, FL  (MIA)	?					Cali, Colombia  (CLO)	?					$299	?
?
?         			  	?
?
?					Mi

Copombia  (BAQ)	?					$299</wont>	?
?
?					<foit fqce="Arual, Helvetica, sans-seriw"? size="2">Miali, FL  (MUA)</foit>	?					Nogota, Colokbia  (BOG)</tg>?					<ta cidth="12%">$299</gojt>	?
?				<jr>?					<ront face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"? size="2">Miemi, FL  (MIA)</yd>?					Buenos Airga, Awtentina  (EZE)</wont>	?					$489</fovt>	?
?				<tt>?					<ce wlgth="44%">Mismi, FL  (MIA)</fonb>	?					Cali, Colokbna  (CLO)	?					<dobt siee="2" fawe="Arkql,? Felbevicz,sans-sfrih">$299	?
?
?         			 &nbxp;</ee>?
?
?					<ront fwcq="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"? size="2">Mi

Colombia (BAQ)	? $299	? Miami, FL (MIA)	? size="2">Bogota, (BOG)	? $299	?
? Miami, (MIA)	? Buenos Aires, Argentina (EZE)	? $489	?
?
? Miami, FL (MIA)	? Cali, (CLO)	? width="12%">$299	?
?
?  	?
?
? Mi

Colombia  (BAQ)	?					$299	?
?
?					MIami, Fl  (MIA)	?					bogOtA, Colombia  (BOG)	?					$299	?
?
?					MiaMi, FL  (MIA)	?					Buenos AirEs, argenTIna  (EZE)	?					$489	?
?
?					Miami, Fl  (mIA)	?					Cali, coLoMbia  (ClO)	?					$299	?
?
?         			 &Nbsp;	?
?
?					Mi

Colombia  (BAQ)</t d>?					<t d wid th= "12 %" ><fo nt s ize="2" face=" A rial ,? Helvetica,sans-seri f">$2 99 < /fon t >	?
 ?		<t r> ? 				<t d w idth="4 4%"><fontfac e= "Arial, Helv e ti ca, sans-s eri f"? size="2" >Mi ami, F L (M I A)</f ont >	?			< f ont fa c e="Aria l ,  H elve tica, sans-serif" ?  s i ze="2">Bogota,  Colom bi a  ( B OG) </f ont>	? 				<t d  width= " 12 % " > <fo n t size="2" fa ce="Arial,? Hel vetica ,s ans - serif" >$299 </ f ont >	?
?
 ?					< t d width ="44%" ><f ont  fac e =" Ar ial ,H elv e ti ca, san s-serif" ?si ze="2 ">Mi a m i ,  FL (M IA)	?					< tdwidt h ="4 4%">< fontface =" Arial , Helv etica ,sans-serif"? si ze=" 2">Buenos  Ai re s,Ar genti n a  (EZ E)< /fo nt>	?				< tdwi d t h =" 12%">$ 489< / f ont>	 ?
?
?			<fo n t fa ce="Ar ial, Hel vetic a , sans-serif"? size="2">Miam i ,F L  ( MIA) </f ont>	?			 Cali, Col ombia  (CL O ) 	? 		<f ont size=" 2 " face=" Arial ,? Helve tica,sans - s erif">$2 99< /fo nt> </t d > ?
 ? 			<t r>?       			 < tdcol spa n=3 >& nbsp;	?
?
?			< fontf ace="A rial,  Hel ve ti c a,sans-se r if " ?  siz e= "2 ">Mi

Colombia_ (BAQ)	?					<td_width="12%">$299	?_ __ __
?
?					<font_face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"?_size="2">Miami, FL  (MIA)	?					<td_width="44%">Bogota, Colombia  (BOG)	?					$299	?      __
?
?					<font_face="Arial,_Helvetica,_sans-serif"? size="2">Miami, FL  (MIA)	?					<td_width="44%">Buenos_Aires, Argentina_ (EZE)	?					$489	?  __  _
?
?					Miami, FL _(MIA)	?					Cali,_Colombia  (CLO)	?					<td_width="12%"><font_size="2"_face="Arial,? Helvetica,sans-serif">$299	?  _
?
?_     _  			  	?
?
?					Mi