@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L
Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey
Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E
White/HOU/EES@EES, G G Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron,
Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosane Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary_trosper@pgn.com,
Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Ann Brown/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L
Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron
Communications@Enron

@Enron, Cindy Olson / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Lou L
 Pai / HOU / EES@EES, Ken Rice / Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey
 Sherrick / Corp / Enron@ENRON, John Sherriff / LON / ECT@ECT, Jeff
 Skilling / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Greg Whalley / HOU / ECT@ECT, Thomas E
 White / HOU / EES@EES, G G Garcia / NA / Enron@Enron, Marcia Manarin / SA / Enron@Enron,
 Susan Skarness / HOU / ECT@ECT, Stacy
 Guidroz / ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
 Pradhan / ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman / HOU / ECT@ECT,
 Sharron Westbrook / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Kay Chapman / HOU / ECT@ECT, Molly
 Bobrow / NA / Enron@Enron, Rosane Fabozzi / SA / Enron@Enron, Stephanie
 Harris / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge / HOU / ECT@ECT, Mary_trosper@pgn.com,
 Nicki Daw / NA / Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive / HOU / ECT@ECT, Carol Ann Brown / Enron
 Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
 Rodriguez / ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark / Corp / Enron@ENRON,
 Mary E Garza / ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
 McVicker / NA / Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Rosalee
 Fleming / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Vanessa Groscrand / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Tori L
 Wells / HOU / ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips / HOU / ECT@ECT, Loretta
 Brelsford / ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford / HOU / ECT@ECT, Dolores
 Fisher / NA / Enron@Enron, Karen Owens / HOU / EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton / Enron
 Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada / Enron
 Communications@Enron

@Enrln, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@EKRON, Lou L
Pai/HOO/EWS@EES, Nen Ride/Enron Zommunications@Enron Communicetiobs, Jedfrey
Sherrick/Corp/Enrov@ENRON, Jojn Sherruff/LIB/ECT@ECT, Jehr
Skilllug/Corl/Cnron@ZNCON, Greg Whallei/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tvomas E
White/HMU/DED@EES, G G Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia Ianarin/XA/Fnron@Enron,
Suswn Slwrneas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVEMOPMENT@TNRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMEJT@ENGON_DEVELOPMENT, Karfn K Heathmqn/HOT/WCT@ECT,
Sharrun Westbrook/Corp/Enron@EHRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Bobrpw/NA/Enron@Ebrin, Gmsane Fabozvi/SA/Engon@Enron, Stepmsnie
Hdrris/Cotp/Enron@ENRON, Bvidgev Maeonge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary_trmsper@pgn.com,
Nicki Qaw/NA/Enrot@Euron, Inez Dauterive/HOY/EXT@ECT, Carml Avb Bfowh/Eiroh
Commknirations@Enroh Communicarions, Elaine
Rodrigies/VMRON_DEVELOPMSNT@ENRJN_QEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mdry E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENR@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mauteen
McVicher/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sosalxe
Fltmlkg/Cofp/Ejron@ENRON, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tory L
Wvlls/HOU/ECT@ECT, Catmy Phillips/HOU/ECT@EVT, Lptetta
Brelsfora/ENRON_BSVSLOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELLPMENT, Fue Fird/HOU/ECT@TCT, Dplores
Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Kqren Owens/HOL/EES@WES, Dorothy Dalton/Znron
Communncatioms@Enrpn Communications, Mercebes Esfrada/Enron
Fommunicafkons@Enron

@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Communications, Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg G Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan Stacy Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Molly Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosane Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary_trosper@pgn.com, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, L Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Estrada/Enron Communications@Enron

@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@EnRON, Lou L
PaI/HOU/EeS@EeS, KEn rice/enroN CommunicationS@enroN Communications, Jeffrey
sherrIcK/corp/eNrOn@ENRoN, John SHErRIFf/LoN/eCt@ECt, JEFf
skillIng/corp/EnrOn@ENRON, GreG WhAlLey/HOU/ECT@ECT, tHoMas E
White/HoU/EeS@EES, G G GarciA/NA/enron@ENrOn, MARcia MAnaRin/SA/enron@ENRon,
SusAn SkarnesS/Hou/ECT@ECt, stacy
GuIDRoZ/ENRoN_DEVELOPMENT@ENROn_dEveLOPMENT, Beena
PRadhan/eNroN_devELoPMeNT@ENRON_DEvElOPMEnt, Karen K hEaTHMAn/Hou/ECT@ECT,
SharroN Westbrook/CORp/ENron@ENrOn, KaY chapmaN/HOU/EcT@ecT, MOlly
Bobrow/Na/EnrOn@Enron, RoSane FaBOzzi/SA/ENRon@EnroN, StephAniE
HaRris/cOrP/ENroN@EnrON, bRiDgeT marOnge/HOU/EcT@eCt, Mary_TrosPER@PGn.coM,
NiCki DAw/NA/ENron@Enron, Inez dauTeriVE/HOu/ECT@EcT, CarOl AnN BRown/ENron
CoMmuniCaTions@Enron CommuNicaTions, ElaiNe
ROdRigUeZ/ENROn_dEVELOpMEnT@EnRON_DEVeLOPMENt, cinDy sTARk/corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary e GARZa/eNRON_DEVeLOPMEnt@EnRon_DEVELOPmEnT, MAureEN
mcVicKer/Na/enRon@Enron, joanniE wiLlIamson/COrP/Enron@eNrON, rosAlee
FLEminG/Corp/ENron@ENROn, VaneSSa Groscrand/CorP/enron@ENRON, TorI l
WELLs/hoU/ECt@ECt, Cathy PhillIps/Hou/ECT@eCT, LOReTta
bRelsfOrd/ENrOn_dEveLOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOpMeNT, Sue ford/HoU/ECT@ECT, DolorEs
Fisher/NA/eNROn@Enron, KAren oWeNS/HOU/EES@EES, DoroThy DaLton/Enron
COMmunicatIons@ENron CommUnicationS, mErcedes EStrAda/enrOn
COMMuNications@EnroN

@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/E nron@ENRON , Lou  L
Pa i/ HOU/ EES@ EES, Ken Rice/ E nron  Communications@EnronCommu ni c atio n s,  Jeff rey
Sh e rr i c k/C or p/ Enr on @ EN RON,Joh n Sherr iff/LON/EC T@E CT , Jeff
Skil l in g/Corp/Enr on@ ENRON, GregWha lley/H OU /EC T @ECT,  Th omasE
Whi t e/HOU/ EES@EES,GG  Garci a /NA/Enr o n @E nron , Marcia Manarin/ S A/ E nron@Enron,
S usan S ka r ne s s /HO U/E CT@ECT, St ac y
Gu i droz/EN R ON _ D E VEL O PMENT@ENRON_D EVELOPMENT, Bee na
Pr ad han / ENRON_ DEVEL OP M ENT @ENRON_DEVE LOPM ENT, Kare n K He a thman/H O U/ECT@E CT,
S har ron  Wes t br oo k/C or p /En r on @EN R ON,  Kay Cha pm an /HOU/ ECT@ E C T ,  Mol ly
Bob row/N A/Enron@Enron , R osan e  Fa bozzi /SA/E nron @E nron,  Steph anie
H arris/Corp/Enro n@EN RON, Brid get  M aro ng e/HOU / ECT@EC T,Mar y_trosp er@pgn. c om,  N i c ki  Daw/NA/Enron@Enro n, I ne z Dauter ive/HO U /E CT @ ECT, Car ol  An n Br o w n/Enr on C om municati ons@En r on  C ommunic at ions,El ain e Rodri g uez/ ENRON_ DEVELOPM ENT@E N RON_DEVELOPMEN T , Cindy Stark / Co r p /E n ron@ ENR ON,
Mary E  Gar z a/EN RON_ D EV ELO P MENT@ ENRON _D E VE L OPMENT, Maureen
Mc Vi cker/N A/Enr on@Enron, Joa nnie Willi a m s on/Corp/ Enro n @E N RON, Rosalee Flemi ng/Corp/En r on@ENRON , Van essa Gro scrand/Co r p /Enron@E NRO N,Tor i L We lls/HOU/ECT@E C T , Ca th y Phill ips /HOU/EC T@E CT,  Lo ret ta
Brelsfo rd/ENRON _D EV EL OP MEN T@ENR O N_DEVELO PM ENT ,Sue  Ford / HOU/EC T@ECT , Do lo re s
F isher/N A /E n r on@E nr on , Ka ren  O wens/ HOU/ E ES@ EES, Do rothy Dal ton / Enro n
C ommunic ations@EnronCo mmunicatio ns , M ercede s Estrada/ Enron
Communications@E n ron

@Enron, Cindy_Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou_L
Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron_Communications@Enron Communications,_Jeffrey_
Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John_Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT,_Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg_Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E_
White/HOU/EES@EES, G G Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron,_Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron,
Susan_Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT,_Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosane_Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron,_Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON,_Bridget_Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT,_Mary_trosper@pgn.com,
Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT,_Carol Ann Brown/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications,_Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,_Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie_Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON,_Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vanessa_Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L
Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue_Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy_Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications,_Mercedes_Estrada/Enron_
Communications@Enron


. Should I deny the requests?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 10:26 AM -----

	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>
	01/15/2001 07:13 PM

		 To: "richard.b.sanders@enron.com" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Approval is Overdue: Access Request for hugh.eichelman@enron.com

This request has been pending approval for  6 days and you are the
alternate.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012515&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000012515
Approver            : linda.r.guinn@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/8/01 8:12:00 AM
Requested For       : hugh.eichelman@enron.com
Resource Name       : Litigation Tracking Database Write
Resource Type       : Applications Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/30/01.   Please note that
Imperial Sugar Company, Beaumont Methanol Limited Partnership, Terra
Industries, Terra International, Terra Nitrogen Corp. (and LP) and Terra
Resources were all placed on NO TRADES.  Also, AK Steel Corporation, Jonan
Gas Marketing and Royster-Clark Inc. are all new additions that require
Credit approval.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897. I have a conflict at 130. Rose has been reliable at showing up and
participating, so I suggest that she be included, although it sounds like she
'll be with John.

ckm

. Should I deny the requests?
 ----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders / HOU / ECT on 01/16/2001 10:26 AM -----

	 ARSystem < ARSystem@mailman.enron.com >
	 01/15/2001 07:13 prime minister

		  To: " richard.b.sanders@enron.com " < richard.b.sanders@enron.com >
		  cc:
		  national: Approval is Overdue: Access Request for hugh.eichelman@enron.com

 This request has been pending blessing for   6 days and you are the
 alternate.   Please click
 http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012515&Page=
 Approval to review and act upon this request.

 Request ID          : 000000000012515
 Approver            : linda.r.guinn@enron.com
 Request Create Date: 1/8/01 8:12:00 americium
 Requested For       : hugh.eichelman@enron.com
 Resource Name       : Litigation Tracking Database Write
 Resource Type       : Applications attach is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/30/01.    Please notice that
 Imperial Sugar Company, Beaumont Methanol Limited Partnership, Terra
 Industries, Terra International, Terra Nitrogen Corp. (and LP) and Terra
 Resources were all placed on NO TRADES.   Also, AK Steel Corporation, Jonan
 Gas Marketing and Royster - Clark Inc. are all new additions that command
 Credit approval.
 If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
 distribution, please see that they receive a copy of this report.
 To total additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
 sent to you in mistake, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6 - 6002.
 For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3 - 3831, Russell Diamond
 at x5 - 7095, or Brant Reves at x3 - 9897. I have a battle at 130. Rose has been reliable at showing up and
 participating, so I suggest that she be included, although it sounds like she
'll be with John.

 ckm

. Shluld I deny the requests?
----- Forwarded by Rnxhard U Sandeds/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 10:26 AM -----

	ARSystem <ARSystem@mamlmab.enrob.com>
	01/15/2001 07:13 PM

		 To: "richard.b.sxnders@enrln.com" <rixharv.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Sunlect: Ziprovcl is Overdue: Acgess Requesd for hugh.eichaloau@enron.com

This request has been pendigg apprpvwl for  6 days wnd jot ars the
alternate.  Please click
http://jtcapps.borp.enron.com/srrs/aith/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012515&Page=
Approgal ho review and act kpon this rgsuefr.

Request ID          : 000000000012515
Approver            : linda.r.guinn@enron.com
Reqjest Ereate Date : 1/8/01 8:12:00 AL
Tequested Foc       : hugh.eichelman@enrot.com
Respurce Name       : Lirigation Tracking Datebase Write
Resource Jype       : Cpplications Attached iw a rgviseg Crdeit Wauch ljsting as of 4/30/01.   Plezse note thqt
Imperial Sugar Cpm[qny, Beaumont Jethanjl Limited Partnership, Terra
Industries, Ttrra Jnternational, Terra Niteogen Corp. (and LP) and Terra
Refources were all placed on NO TRADES.  Also, AK Steal Cocpurauiin, Jovqn
Gas Marketing and Royster-Clark Inc. are all nqs sdcitions that rcquire
Credit apprpvwl.
Yf there are xny pexaohnel in your group that wgre nor includeq in this
distribution, please ibsure that tkey receive a copy of this reporc.
To adc addotional people to this bistrigution, or iv this relurt has been
seng tp fou in error, please contace Veronice Espnnoza at x6-6002.
Fot other questions, please contact Bill Brafford ad x3-3831, Russelp Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves av x3-9897. I have a votflpct at 130. Rjse hss been reliafle at showing up and
partkcipating, ao I sujgest that sre be includeg, although it sounds jike she
'll be dkth John.

ckm

. Should I deny the requests? ----- Richard Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10:26 AM ----- To: <richard.b.sanders@enron.com> cc: Subject: is Overdue: Access for hugh.eichelman@enron.com This request has been approval for 6 days and you are the alternate. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012515&Page= Approval review and act upon this request. Request ID : 000000000012515 Approver : linda.r.guinn@enron.com Create : 8:12:00 Requested For : hugh.eichelman@enron.com Resource Name : Litigation Tracking Database Write Resource Type : Applications Attached a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/30/01. note that Imperial Sugar Beaumont Methanol Limited Partnership, Terra Terra Terra Nitrogen (and and Resources were all on NO TRADES. Also, AK Steel Corporation, Jonan Gas Marketing and Royster-Clark Inc. are all new additions require Credit there are personnel your that were not this distribution, please insure that they of this report. To add additional people to distribution, or this report has been sent to in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002. other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond at x5-7095, or Brant Reves I have a conflict 130. Rose has reliable showing and so I that she be included, although it sounds like she 'll be John. ckm

. Should I deny the requests?
----- ForWarded by RiChard b SaNdeRs/hOU/EcT on 01/16/2001 10:26 aM -----

	ARSystem <ARSySTem@mAilman.enron.com>
	01/15/2001 07:13 PM

		 To: "richArd.b.sAnDErs@eNRoN.com" <rIchard.b.SAnDERs@eNrOn.Com>
		 Cc:
		 sUbJect: APprOval is OVerdue: AcceSs REqUest for hugh.eIChElman@enron.Com

this request hAs bEen penDiNg aPProvaL foR  6 days And you ARe the
aLternate.  PLeASe clicK
Http://itcAPPs.Corp.Enron.com/srrs/auth/eMAiLlink.asp?ID=000000000012515&Page=
APprovaL tO ReVIEw aNd aCt upon this ReQuest.

rEquest Id          : 000000000012515
apPROVer            : LInda.r.guinn@enrOn.com
RequesT creAte DatE : 1/8/01 8:12:00 Am
ReQUested for       : huGh.EIchElman@enron.cOm
ReSource NamE       : LitigATion TraCKing DatAbase WRitE
ReSourCE TYpE       : ApPlICatIOnS AtTAchEd is a revIsEd crediT WatCH LIStinG as Of 4/30/01.   PlEase nOte that
ImperiAl SUgar cOmpAny, BeAumonT MetHaNol LiMited PArtneRsHip, Terra
IndustrIes, TErra InterNatIoNal, teRra NiTRogen COrp. (And lP) and TeRra
ResoURceS wERE AlL placed on NO TRADES.  ALsO, ak STeel CorpOratioN, joNaN
gas MarkeTiNg aNd RoYSTer-ClArk INC. aRe all new AdditiONs ThAt requiRe
credit ApProVal.
if theRE are Any perSonnel in Your gROup that were not INcluded in this
DIsTRIbUTion, PleAse insure thAt thEY recEive A CoPy oF This rEport.
to ADd ADditional people to thIs DistriButioN, or if this repoRt has been
sENT To you in eRror, PLeASe contact VeronIca EsPinoza at x6-6002.
FOR other quEstioNs, please Contact BiLL bradford At x3-3831, rusSelL DiAMOnD
at x5-7095, or Brant ReVES at x3-9897. i hAve a conFliCt at 130. RosE haS beEn rEliAbLe at showiNg up and
pArTiCiPaTinG, so I sUGgest thaT sHe bE iNclUded, aLThough It souNds lIkE sHE
'll Be with JOHn.

CKM

. Should I deny the reques ts?
-----Forwa rde d b yRich ardB Sanders/HOU/ E CT o n 01/16/2001 10:26 AM-----
ARSy s te m <AR System@ m ai l m an. en ro n.c om >
01/15 /20 01 07:1 3 PM

	 T o:  "richard.b. s an ders@enron .co m" <richard. b.s anders @e nro n .com>
	 cc:
		 Su b ject:Approvalis Overdu e : Acces s Re ques t for hugh.eichel m an @ enron.com

Th is req ue s th a s b een  pending a pp roval for  6d ay s a ndy ou are the
a lternate. P lea se cli ck
h t tp://i tcapp s. c orp .enron.com/ srrs /auth/ema ilLink . asp?ID= 0 0000000 001251 5&P age =
Ap p ro va l t or evi e wand act  upon th is  r eques t.
Requ est  ID        : 0000000 000 1251 5
Ap prove r         : l inda.r .guin n@ enron.com
Reque st C reate Dat e :  1 /8/ 01  8:12 : 00 AMReq ues ted For       :  hu gh . e i ch elman@enron.com
Re so u r ce  Name      :L it ig a tion Tra ck ing  Dat a b ase W rite Re source T ype    :  Applic at ions A tt ach edis ar evis ed Cre dit Watc h lis t ing as of 4/30 / 01.   Pleasen ot e th a t
I mpe rial SugarComp a ny,Beau m on t M e thano l Lim it e dP artnership, Terra In dustri es, T erra Internat ional, Ter r a Nitrogen  Cor p .( and LP) and Te rra Resourcesw ere allplace d on NOTRADES. A l so, AK S tee l C orp ora t i on , Jonan
GasM a rket in g and R oys ter-Cla rkInc . a real l new add itions t ha tre qu ire
Cre d it appro va l.
I f t herea re any  pers onne lin you r group th a t  wer eno t in clu de d inthis
di stribut ion, plea sei nsur eth at they  receive a co py  of this r ep ort .
To a d d  additio nal people to this dist r ibution , o r ifthis  report h asbeen sen t  to yo u in e rror,  p lea s e  cont a c tVer on ica Espino z a  at  x6-6 00 2.
F or othe r questions, pleas e  co ntact Bill Br adf orda t  x 3-3 8 31 ,  Ru ss e llD i amond
at x5-70 95, or Bra nt Re ves at x3- 9 897 .I havea confl ict a t  130. R ose has b een relia bl e at s how ing up and
partic ipating,s o I s u gg est t hat  she b einc luded , alth o ugh  it s oundsli ke she
'll  b e with J ohn.

ckm

. Should_I deny_the requests?
----- Forwarded by_Richard B_Sanders/HOU/ECT_on 01/16/2001_10:26_AM -----

	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>
	01/15/2001_07:13 PM

		_To: "richard.b.sanders@enron.com" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:_
		 Subject: Approval_is_Overdue: Access Request for hugh.eichelman@enron.com

This request has been pending approval for  6 days_and_you are_the_
alternate._ Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012515&Page=
Approval to_review and act upon this_request.

Request ID_       __: 000000000012515
Approver _        _ : linda.r.guinn@enron.com
Request Create Date :_1/8/01 8:12:00 AM
Requested_For__   _ : hugh.eichelman@enron.com
Resource Name  _    : Litigation_Tracking Database Write
Resource Type   _   : Applications Attached_is a revised Credit Watch_listing as_of 4/30/01.   Please_note that
Imperial_Sugar Company,_Beaumont Methanol Limited_Partnership, Terra
Industries, Terra International, Terra_Nitrogen Corp. (and_LP) and Terra
Resources were all_placed_on NO TRADES.__Also,_AK Steel_Corporation, Jonan
Gas_Marketing_and Royster-Clark_Inc._are all new additions that require_
Credit_approval.
If there are any personnel in_your group that were_not_included in this
distribution,_please insure that they receive_a copy of this report.
To add_additional people_to this_distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in_error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at_x6-6002.
For other questions, please_contact Bill_Bradford_at x3-3831, Russell_Diamond_
at x5-7095,_or Brant Reves at x3-9897. I have_a conflict_at 130. Rose has been reliable_at showing up and_
participating,_so I suggest that she be_included, although it sounds like she_
'll be with John.

ckm


18:42:44 Synchronizing Favorites
18:42:44 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
18:42:46 	   10 item(s) added to offline folder
18:42:46 	   13 item(s) deleted in offline folder
18:42:46 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
18:42:47 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
18:42:48 	   4 item(s) added to offline folder
18:42:48 	   7 item(s) deleted in offline folder
18:42:48 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
18:42:48 	   1 item(s) added to offline folder
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Earnings'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron Financials'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Expense Report'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Lotus Notes'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Personal'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Phone List'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'To Do'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Travel Info.'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Vacation'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'WestLaw & Lexis'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Views
18:42:49 Synchronizing Forms
18:42:49 Done Excellent reading of the legal authority issues as well as the political
winds.  I think your sense of the likelihood of trouble is accurate.  I also
agree with your implicit premise that if FERC or anyone else wanted to make
trouble regarding our negotiated rate deals, the easiest approach, and the
most direct one, is to challenge the deals as unjust and unreasonable under
NGA section 4/5.  To challenge the deals under some state

18:42:44 Synchronizing Favorites
 18:42:44 Synchronizing Folder' Inbox'
 18:42:46 	    10 item(s) added to offline folder
 18:42:46 	    13 item(s) deleted in offline folder
 18:42:46 Synchronizing Folder' Outbox'
 18:42:47 Synchronizing Folder' Sent item'
 18:42:48 	    4 item(s) lend to offline folder
 18:42:48 	    7 item(s) deleted in offline folder
 18:42:48 Synchronizing Folder' Calendar'
 18:42:48 	    1 item(s) add to offline folder
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Contacts'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' draft'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Earnings'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Enron Financials'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Expense Report'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Journal'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Lotus Notes'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Notes'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Personal'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Phone List'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' undertaking'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' To Do'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Travel Info.'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' Vacation'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder' WestLaw & Lexis'
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Views
 18:42:49 Synchronizing Forms
 18:42:49 dress Excellent reading of the legal authority topic as well as the political
 winds.   I think your sense of the likelihood of trouble is accurate.   I also
 match with your implicit premise that if FERC or anyone else wanted to make
 trouble involve our negotiated rate deals, the easy approach, and the
 most direct one, is to challenge the deals as unfair and unreasonable under
 NGA section 4/5.   To challenge the deals under some state

18:42:44 Syjchronizing Favorites
18:42:44 Sykchronizing Foldgr 'Inbox'
18:42:46 	   10 ifem(s) adddd to offline folder
18:42:46 	   13 itel(s) deleuvd in offline folder
18:42:46 Rynchroniding Foldwr 'Ontbox'
18:42:47 Synchronizmhg Foldcx 'Senf Itekw'
18:42:48 	   4 item(s) adced to offnine folder
18:42:48 	   7 ktzm(s) deleted in offline folder
18:42:48 Synchrjnizing Fllder 'Calendar'
18:42:48 	   1 ytem(a) added to offline folder
18:42:49 Synchronjzing Fmlder 'Contactx'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Dravts'
18:42:49 Dynchronizing Foldfr 'Earnings'
18:42:49 Synsyronizing Fouder 'Enron Financials'
18:42:49 Aynchronizing Folder 'Expense Reoort'
18:42:49 Xynchronizunt Flnder 'Journao'
18:42:49 Synbhronizing Folder 'Lotgs Notex'
18:42:49 Synchronizinn Folver 'Botes'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Fmlder 'Personal'
18:42:49 Synshronizinc Yolder 'Phone List'
18:42:49 Synxheonizhng Xoldde 'Txska'
18:42:49 Xyhchronlziig Folder 'Tk Do'
18:42:49 Synchrinizing Folder 'Travtl Ybfo.'
18:42:49 Synchroniaing Fjlqer 'Vacation'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'WestLdw & Lexis'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Viwws
18:42:49 Synchronizing Forls
18:42:49 Done Evcellent reading of the legal authority issues as well xs uhc oilltical
winds.  I think your sense of the likelygopd of trouble is accurate.  O wlxj
agree with iour im'midit premise that iv FERC jr antone else wanyed to make
trouble regardibg our negotpatee rate deals, the ecsiest approcch, anc the
most direct one, is to ehallehge the deaps as unjhrt and unreasonacle utder
NGA section 4/5.  To chaljenge the deaks undef soke staee

18:42:44 Synchronizing Favorites 18:42:44 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox' item(s) to offline 18:42:46 13 item(s) Synchronizing 'Outbox' 18:42:47 Synchronizing 'Sent Items' 18:42:48 item(s) added to offline folder 18:42:48 item(s) deleted in offline folder 18:42:48 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar' 18:42:48 1 item(s) added offline folder 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts' 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts' 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 18:42:49 Folder Financials' Synchronizing Folder 'Expense Report' 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal' 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Lotus Notes' 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Personal' 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Phone 18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks' Synchronizing Folder 'To Do' 18:42:49 Folder Info.' 18:42:49 Folder 18:42:49 Folder 'WestLaw & 18:42:49 Synchronizing Views 18:42:49 Synchronizing Forms 18:42:49 Done Excellent reading of the legal authority issues as well the political think your of likelihood trouble is accurate. agree with your implicit premise that anyone else wanted to make trouble regarding our rate deals, easiest approach, and the most direct is to challenge the deals as unjust and under NGA section 4/5. To challenge the deals under some state

18:42:44 Synchronizing Favorites
18:42:44 SynChronizing foldeR 'InBox'
18:42:46 	   10 ItEm(s) aDded To offline foldeR
18:42:46 	   13 Item(S) deleted in offline foldeR
18:42:46 SyncHrONiziNG FOlder 'outbox'
18:42:47 SYNcHROniZiNg folDeR 'seNt IteMs'
18:42:48 	   4 iTem(s) addEd to offlinE foLdEr
18:42:48 	   7 item(s) deletED iN offline foLdeR
18:42:48 SynchroniziNg FOlder 'CAlEndAR'
18:42:48 	   1 item(S) adDed to OfflinE Folder
18:42:49 synchroniZiNG FoldeR 'contactS'
18:42:49 sYnChroNizing Folder 'DraftS'
18:42:49 syNChronizing FoldEr 'EarnInGS'
18:42:49 SYNChrOniZing Folder 'enRon FiNAncials'
18:42:49 sYnCHROniZIng Folder 'ExpeNse Report'
18:42:49 SyNChrOnizinG FOldER 'JournAl'
18:42:49 SynChROniZing Folder 'LOtus notes'
18:42:49 SyncHronizINg FoldeR 'notes'
18:42:49 SyNchronIziNg FOldeR 'peRsOnaL'
18:42:49 SYNchROnIziNG FoLder 'PhonE LIsT'
18:42:49 SyncHronIZING FolDer 'taskS'
18:42:49 SyncHronizing FoldEr 'TO Do'
18:42:49 SYNchRonizIng FoLder 'trAvel INfo.'
18:42:49 SynChronIzIng Folder 'VacatiOn'
18:42:49 SyNchroniziNg FOlDer 'weStLaw & lExis'
18:42:49 SyNchRonIzing ViEws
18:42:49 SyncHRonIzING foRms
18:42:49 Done Excellent reAdING oF the legaL authoRItY iSSues as weLl As tHe poLITical
WindS.  i tHink your Sense oF ThE lIkelihoOd Of trouBlE is AccUrate.  i Also
Agree wIth your iMplicIT premise that if feRC or anyone elSE wANTeD To maKe
tRouble regarDing OUr neGotiATeD raTE dealS, the eAsIEsT Approach, and the
most dIrEct one, Is to cHallenge the deAls as unjusT AND unreasoNablE UnDEr
NGA section 4/5.  To ChallEnge the deaLS under soMe staTe

18:42:44 Synchronizing Fav orites
18: 42:44  Sy nch ro nizi ng F older 'Inbox'1 8:42 :46 	   10 item(s) add ed to  o f flin e  f older
18:42: 4 6  1 3it em( s) de leted  in  offlin e folder
1 8:4 2: 46 Synchroni z in g Folder ' Out box'
18:42:4 7 S ynchro ni zin g  Fold er'Sent  Items '
18:42 :48 	   4  i t em(s)a dded to o ff line  folder
18:42:48 7 item(s) dele ted in  o f fl i n e f old er
18:42:4 8Synch r onizing Fo l d e r ' C alendar'
18:4 2:48 	   1i tem (s) ad de d t o  offli ne fo ld e r
1 8:42:49 Syn chro nizing Fo lder ' C ontacts '
18:42: 49 Syn chr oni zing Fo ld er'D r aft s '18: 4 2:4 9 Synchr on iz ing F olde r ' E arni ngs '
18 :42:4 9 Synchronizi ngFold e r ' Enron  Fina ncia ls '
18: 42:49Synch ro nizing Folder ' Expe nse Repor t'18 :42 :4 9 Syn c hroniz ing  Fo lder 'J ournal' 18: 42 : 4 9  S ynchronizing Folde r' L ot us Notes '
18:4 2 :4 9S ynchroni zi ngFold e r  'Not es'1 8: 42:49 Sy nchron i zi ng  Folder  ' Person al '
1 8:4 2:49S ynch ronizi ng Folde r 'Ph o ne List'
18:42 : 49 Synchroniz i ng F ol d er ' Tas ks'
18:42:4 9 Sy n chro nizi n gFol d er 'T o Do'
1 8 :4 2 :49 Synchronizing F ol der 'T ravel  Info.'
18:42 :49 Synchr o n i zing Fol der' Va c ation'
18:42:4 9 Syn chronizing Folder ' WestL aw & Lex is'
18:42 : 4 9 Synchr oni zin g V iew s 18 :42:49 Synchr o n izin gForms
1 8:4 2:49 Do neExc ell ent  r eading of  the leg al  a ut ho rit y iss u es as we ll  as  t hepolit i cal
w inds.   Ith in k  yo ur sens e  o f theli ke liho odof  trou blei s a ccurate .  I also
a g reewi th  your i mplicit premi se  that if F ER C o r anyo n e  else wa nted to make
trouble r e garding  ou r neg otia ted ratedea ls, th e e a siestapproa ch, a nd  th e
most d ir ect  o ne, is toc h all engeth e de als asunjust and unreaso n abl e under
NGAsec tion 4 /5 . T oc hal le n get h e deals under s ome state

18:42:44 Synchronizing_Favorites
18:42:44 Synchronizing_Folder 'Inbox'
18:42:46 	 _ 10_item(s)_added to_offline_folder
18:42:46 	 _ 13 item(s)_deleted in offline folder
18:42:46_Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
18:42:47_Synchronizing_Folder 'Sent Items'
18:42:48 	   4 item(s) added to offline folder
18:42:48 	 __7 item(s)_deleted_in_offline folder
18:42:48 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
18:42:48_	   1 item(s)_added to_offline folder
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
18:42:49_Synchronizing_Folder 'Earnings'
18:42:49 Synchronizing_Folder 'Enron Financials'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Expense Report'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder_'Journal'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Lotus Notes'
18:42:49 Synchronizing_Folder 'Notes'
18:42:49 Synchronizing_Folder_'Personal'
18:42:49_Synchronizing Folder 'Phone List'
18:42:49_Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'To_Do'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Travel Info.'
18:42:49 Synchronizing_Folder 'Vacation'
18:42:49 Synchronizing Folder 'WestLaw & Lexis'
18:42:49_Synchronizing Views
18:42:49 Synchronizing Forms
18:42:49 Done Excellent_reading of the legal authority_issues as_well as the political
winds._ I think_your sense_of the likelihood_of trouble is accurate.  I_also
agree with_your implicit premise that if FERC_or_anyone else wanted_to_make_
trouble regarding_our negotiated rate_deals,_the easiest_approach,_and the
most direct one, is_to_challenge the deals as unjust and unreasonable_under
NGA section 4/5.__To challenge the deals_under some state


00:13.0085 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F0E74D0:01C1AC3D]
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

KT Igot this from the radio freind of mine on wicc am 60 I hope you don't
mind.
Nunziec32

>From: "john laBarca" <jjlabarca@hotmail.com>
>To: alissa@webe108.com, calabresecharlie1@hotmail.com, Chazros@aol.com,
>djbumpire81@hotmail.com, eaglepaintball@yahoo.com, Exit153b@aol.com,
>famousbirth-html@rtn.emazing.com, Mojoman18414@cs.com, mrlaughs@msn.com,
>tbusch@knom.org, UdiSondon@aol.com, yadaya2000@aol.com
>Subject: Fwd: Fw: Please send this back... you'll see why
>Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 17:10:07 -0500
>

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com

John LaBarca
>From: KindP@aol.com
>To: jjlabarca@hotmail.com
>Subject: Fwd: Fw: Please send this back... you'll see why
>Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:12:07 EST
>
>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <rowjay@home.com>
Received: from  rly-xg02.mx.aol.com (rly-xg02.mail.aol.com [172.20.115.199]) by air-xg02.mail.aol.com (v83.35) with ESMTP id MAILINXG21-0201162217; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:22:17 -0500
Received: from  femail1.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail1.sdc1.sfba.home

00:13.0085 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F0E74D0:01C1AC3D ]
 X - Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

 KT Igot this from the radio freind of mine on wicc am 60 I hope you don't
 mind.
 Nunziec32

 > From: " john laBarca " < jjlabarca@hotmail.com >
 > To: alissa@webe108.com, calabresecharlie1@hotmail.com, Chazros@aol.com,
 > djbumpire81@hotmail.com, eaglepaintball@yahoo.com, Exit153b@aol.com,
 > famousbirth-html@rtn.emazing.com, Mojoman18414@cs.com, mrlaughs@msn.com,
 > tbusch@knom.org, UdiSondon@aol.com, yadaya2000@aol.com
 > Subject: Fwd: Fw: Please station this back... you'll examine why
 > Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 17:10:07 -0500
 >

 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 Join the world's largest einsteinium - mail service with MSN Hotmail.
 http://www.hotmail.com

 John LaBarca
 > From: KindP@aol.com
 > To: jjlabarca@hotmail.com
 > discipline: Fwd: Fw: Please send this back... you'll see why
 > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:12:07 EST
 >
 >
 Content - transportation - Encoding: 7bit
 Return - Path: < rowjay@home.com >
 get: from   rly-xg02.mx.aol.com (rly-xg02.mail.aol.com [ 172.20.115.199 ]) by air-xg02.mail.aol.com (v83.35) with ESMTP i d MAILINXG21 - 0201162217; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:22:17 -0500
 Received: from   femail1.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail1.sdc1.sfba.home

00:13.0085 (UTF) FILETIME=[5F0E74D0:01C1AC3D]
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

KT Mgot thjs from ghe radio freind of mine on xicc am 60 U hope you don't
mind.
Nunxiec32

>From: "uohn laBqrca" <hjlabarca@hotmail.com>
>To: aljdsa@wzbx108.com, calabresecmarlie1@hotmahl.com, Chazros@aml.zol,
>djbumpire81@hotmail.com, eaglepaintball@rahoo.cok, Fxit153b@aol.com,
>famjusbpreh-htjl@rtn.emazing.com, Mojoman18414@cs.com, mrlaufhs@msn.cmm,
>tbusch@knom.otg, UdiSondon@aol.com, yadaya2000@all.col
>Subject: Fwd: Fw: Plfase send tyis fqck... you'll sed why
>Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 17:10:07 -0500
>

_________________________________________________________________
Jkin the world's largest e-mail sefvice with MSN Yormaln.
http://www.hotnail.cjm

John LaBargs
>From: NindP@aok.com
>To: jjlabavca@hovmaio.com
>Subject: Fwd: Fw: Pnease send this bask... you'll vez why
>Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:12:07 EWT
>
>
Wontant-Tfqnswer-Tncpdjng: 7bih
Revurn-Path: <rosjay@home.com>
Eeceived: from  rly-xb02.mv.qol.com (rly-xg02.mzil.aol.soi [172.20.115.199]) by air-xg02.mail.aol.com (v83.35) with ESMTP id MDILJNXG21-0201162217; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:22:17 -0500
Receivee: from  femail1.sdc1.sfba.jome.com (fqmail1.sdc1.sfba.home

00:13.0085 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F0E74D0:01C1AC3D] X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) this the radio of mine on you mind. Nunziec32 >From: laBarca" <jjlabarca@hotmail.com> >To: calabresecharlie1@hotmail.com, Chazros@aol.com, >djbumpire81@hotmail.com, eaglepaintball@yahoo.com, Exit153b@aol.com, >famousbirth-html@rtn.emazing.com, mrlaughs@msn.com, >tbusch@knom.org, UdiSondon@aol.com, yadaya2000@aol.com >Subject: Fwd: Fw: Please send this back... you'll see >Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 17:10:07 -0500 > _________________________________________________________________ Join the world's largest service MSN http://www.hotmail.com LaBarca >From: KindP@aol.com >To: jjlabarca@hotmail.com >Subject: Fwd: Fw: Please send this back... you'll see why >Date: 2 Feb 2002 11:12:07 EST > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: Return-Path: <rowjay@home.com> Received: from (rly-xg02.mail.aol.com [172.20.115.199]) by air-xg02.mail.aol.com (v83.35) ESMTP MAILINXG21-0201162217; Fri, Feb 16:22:17 Received: from femail1.sdc1.sfba.home.com

00:13.0085 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F0E74D0:01C1AC3D]
X-Mailer: unknown (No VErsioN)

KT igoT tHis fRom tHe radio freind oF Mine On wicc am 60 I hope you don't
miNd.
NunZiEC32

>FroM: "JoHn laBArca" <jjlABaRCA@hoTmAiL.coM>
>TO: AlIssa@wEbe108.Com, calaBresecharlIe1@hOtMail.com, ChazrOS@aOl.com,
>djbumPirE81@hotmail.com, eAglEpaintBaLl@yAHoo.coM, ExIt153b@aoL.com,
>faMOusbirTh-html@rtn.EmAZing.coM, mojoman18414@CS.CoM, mrlAughs@msn.com,
>tbusch@KNoM.Org, UdiSondon@aoL.com, yaDaYA2000@aOL.Com
>subJect: Fwd: Fw: PLeAse seND this baCK... yOU'LL seE Why
>Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 17:10:07 -0500
>

_________________________________________________________________
join the worlD'S laRgest e-MaIl sERvice wIth MSn HOTmaIl.
http://www.hoTmaiL.com

John LABarca
>fRom: Kindp@Aol.com
>TO: jjlabArcA@hoTmaiL.CoM
>SUbjEcT: fwd: fW: PLeaSE seNd this baCk... YoU'll seE why
>dATE: sat, 2 FEb 2002 11:12:07 EsT
>
>
CoNtent-transfer-EncodIng: 7Bit
RETurN-Path: <RowjaY@homE.cOm>
RecEived: fRom  rlY-xG02.mx.aol.com (rly-xg02.mAil.aOl.com [172.20.115.199]) by aiR-xg02.MaIl.aOl.Com (v83.35) wITh ESMTp id mAIlINXG21-0201162217; FrI, 01 Feb 2002 16:22:17 -0500
RecEIveD: fROM  FeMail1.sdc1.sfba.home.com (FeMAIl1.Sdc1.sfba.hOme

00:13.0085 (UTC) FILETIME= [5F0E74D0: 01C1A C3D ]
X -M aile r: U nknown (No Ver s ion)

KT Igot this from t he ra di o  fre i nd  of m ine onw ic c am60  I  ho pe yo u don 'tmind.
N unziec32
>Fr om : "john laBa r ca " <jjlabar ca@ hotmail.com>
>T o: ali ss a@w e be108 .co m, ca labres e charli e1@hotmai l. c om, Ch a zros@ao l . co m,
> djbumpire81@hotma i l. c om, eaglepaint ball@y ah o o. c o m,Exi t153b@aol. co m,
>f a mousbir t h- h t m l@r t n.emazing.com , Mojoman18 4 14@ cs.com ,mrl a ughs@m sn.co m, >tb usch@knom.o rg,UdiSondon @aol.c o m, yada y a2000@a ol.com
>S ubj ect: Fw d:  Fw :P lea s esen d  th is back. ..  y ou'll  see w h y
>Da te:  Sat , 02Feb 2002 17:1 0:0 7 -0 5 00>

_ _____ ____ __ _____ ______ _____ __ _______________ ____ _________ ___ __ __Jo in th e  world 'slar gest e- mail se r vic ew i t hMSN Hotmail.
http: // w w w. hotmail. com

J oh nL aBarca
> Fr om:  Kin d P @aol. com>T o: jjlab arca@h o tm ai l.com >S ubject :Fwd : F w: Pl e asesend t his back ... y o u'll see why > Date: Sat, 2F eb 2 00 2  11: 12: 07 EST
> >
C o nten t-Tr a ns fer - Encod ing:7b i tR eturn-Path: <rowjay @h ome.co m>
Re ceived: from rly-xg02. m x . aol.com(rly - xg 0 2.mail.aol.com  [172 .20.115.19 9 ]) by ai r-xg0 2.mail.a ol.com (v 8 3 .35) wit h E SMT P i d M A I LI NXG21-0201162 2 1 7; F ri , 01 Fe b 2 002 16: 22: 17-05 00Re ceived: f rom  fem ai l1 .s dc 1.s fba.h o me.com ( fe mai l1 .sd c1.sf b a.home

00:13.0085 (UTC)_FILETIME=[5F0E74D0:01C1AC3D]
X-Mailer: Unknown_(No Version)

KT Igot this_from the_radio_freind of_mine_on wicc am_60 I hope_you don't
mind.
Nunziec32

>From: "john laBarca"_<jjlabarca@hotmail.com>
>To: alissa@webe108.com, calabresecharlie1@hotmail.com,_Chazros@aol.com,
>djbumpire81@hotmail.com,_eaglepaintball@yahoo.com, Exit153b@aol.com,
>famousbirth-html@rtn.emazing.com, Mojoman18414@cs.com, mrlaughs@msn.com,
>tbusch@knom.org, UdiSondon@aol.com, yadaya2000@aol.com
>Subject: Fwd: Fw: Please send this back... you'll see_why
>Date:_Sat, 02_Feb_2002_17:10:07 -0500
>

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world's largest_e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com

John_LaBarca
>From: KindP@aol.com_
>To: jjlabarca@hotmail.com
>Subject: Fwd: Fw: Please send this_back..._you'll see why_
>Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:12:07 EST
>
>_
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <rowjay@home.com>
Received: from  rly-xg02.mx.aol.com_(rly-xg02.mail.aol.com [172.20.115.199]) by_air-xg02.mail.aol.com_(v83.35)_with ESMTP id MAILINXG21-0201162217;_Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:22:17 -0500
Received:_from  femail1.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail1.sdc1.sfba.home


 Agenda, located in the centre of Economist.com,s home
page (http://www.economist.com), complements The Economist
magazine by providing timely updates as major issues and events
unfold.

Global Agenda provides rolling coverage and analysis on six to
eight of the most important business and political topics each
day. A dedicated staff of Economist writers selects topics of
international significance to provide up-to-date and concise
analysis of how these events are affecting industry, governments
and individuals around the world.

This content is available only on Economist.com. The full-length
text of each story, along with pictures and charts, is available
by clicking on the link. The article is accompanied by links to
related Economist stories and relevant newswires and websites.
As world events and priorities change, articles will be updated
and new articles will appear. You can tell that a story has been
updated or changed by looking at the date following it. Major
changes to stories or new stories are noted in red.

As always, the entire print edition of The Economist
(http://www.economist.com/printedition)  and our weekly
e-mailings (http://www.economist.com/members/registration) are
still available online at midnight GMT every Thursday.

If you have any comments or feedback regarding the changes to
our website, or any suggestions for future development, please
contact us on dotcommarketing@Economist.com.

Thank you,

Andrew Rashbass
Managing Director, Economist.com

Quick Links into Economist.com:

* Home Page: http://www.economist.com
* Opinion: http://www.economist.com/opinion
* World: http://www.economist.com/world
* Business: http://www.economist.com/business
* Finance & Economics: http://www.economist.com/finance
* Science & Technology: http://www.economist.com/science
* People: http://www.economist.com/people
* Books & Arts: http://www.economist.com/books
* Markets & Data: http://www.economist.com/markets
* Diversions: http://www.economist.com/diversions
*

Agenda, located in the centre of Economist.com,s home
 page (http://www.economist.com), complements The Economist
 cartridge holder by provide timely updates as major issues and event
 unfold.

 Global Agenda provide rolling coverage and analysis on six to
 eight of the about important business and political topics each
 sidereal day. A consecrated staff of Economist writers selects topic of
 international significance to provide up - to - date and concise
 psychoanalysis of how these events are affecting diligence, governments
 and person around the universe.

 This content is available only on Economist.com. The full - distance
 text of each story, along with pictures and charts, is available
 by snap on the link. The article is accompanied by links to
 related Economist stories and relevant newswires and web site.
 As world events and priorities change, articles will be updated
 and newfangled articles will appear. You can tell that a story has been
 updated or changed by looking at the date following it. Major
 changes to stories or fresh stories are noted in red.

 As constantly, the integral photographic print edition of The Economist
 (http://www.economist.com/printedition)   and our weekly
 e - mailing (http://www.economist.com/members/registration) are
 still available online at midnight GMT every Thursday.

 If you have any comments or feedback regarding the change to
 our website, or any suggestions for future development, please
 contact us on dotcommarketing@Economist.com.

 Thank you,

 Andrew Rashbass
 Managing Director, Economist.com

 Quick Links into Economist.com:

 * Home Page: http://www.economist.com
 * Opinion: http://www.economist.com/opinion
 * World: http://www.economist.com/world
 * occupation: http://www.economist.com/business
 * Finance & Economics: http://www.economist.com/finance
 * Science & Technology: http://www.economist.com/science
 * People: http://www.economist.com/people
 * Books & Arts: http://www.economist.com/books
 * Markets & Data: http://www.economist.com/markets
 * Diversions: http://www.economist.com/diversions
 *

 Agfnda, located in the centve of Economist.com,s homx
page (hftp://www.ecunomist.com), complements The Erononist
mqgazine by providing tkmely updwtes as najoc issues and eveifs
unfold.

Globam Ageude provides rolllng coveraga and analysis ov dix to
eight of the most important btsiness ajd political tjpicx eacg
day. A dedicated staff of Economisf writegs selects topics of
international significajce ho provide up-to-datf and conciwe
anwoysis of how these events are affedting industry, governments
and ivdivibuals aroune rhe forld.

This cintenn is availablc only mn Econpmist.com. The fmll-leigth
rext of each story, almng with pictures wnd chartv, ns available
by clickibg on tve lhnk. Gye xrtjcke is acfom'anied by ljnks to
relared Economist storits wbd relevant nswswirqs and websites.
As world events and prioriuies dhange, articles will be updated
and new articpes will wppear. You can tell that a story has been
updated mr cheneed bn loujijg at the date following it. Major
changes to sekroex or new storics are noted in rec.

Ad sjways, the entkre prnht edition of The Eclnomist
(rttp://wqw.economift.cok/printedition)  and our weekoy
e-mailings (kttp://www.economist.com/melbers/registxation) are
syill available online ac midnjght GMT evfry Thurssxy.

If you have anh cpmkents or feedback regardind the chaiges co
our wecsitg, or anr suggestilns for future developmejt, plgase
cottact us oj dotcommarketing@Economist.com.

Theik you,

Andrew Tasvbavs
Managiug Dircctor, Economist.som

Quick Links into Eeonomirt.com:

* Home Page: hvtp://www.economyst.com
* Opiniot: http://www.econmmist.com/jpinuon
* Qorld: hggp://www.economist.vom/world
* Ybsiness: hrtp://www.economist.com/nusingsa
* Finance & Econimixs: http://www.econokisg.coi/fpnaice
* Sshence & Technmlogh: hgyp://www.dconomist.con/rciemce
* People: http://www.ecmnomjst.com/people
* Books & Wrts: httk://www.econoiist.com/books
* Karkets & Data: http://aww.ecmnooist.cpm/mwrkets
* Diversions: http://www.econojist.com/digerfions
*

Agenda, located in the centre of Economist.com,s (http://www.economist.com), The Economist by providing timely events Global Agenda provides coverage and analysis six to eight of the most business and political topics each day. A dedicated staff of Economist writers selects of international significance to provide up-to-date and concise analysis of how these events affecting governments individuals the world. This content is available only on Economist.com. The full-length text of each story, along pictures and charts, is available by clicking on link. The article is by links to related Economist and newswires and As events priorities change, articles be updated and new articles will appear. You can tell that a story has been updated or by looking date following Major to or new stories in red. As always, the entire The Economist (http://www.economist.com/printedition) and our weekly e-mailings (http://www.economist.com/members/registration) still available at midnight GMT every Thursday. If have any comments or feedback regarding the changes our website, or any suggestions for future development, please contact us on dotcommarketing@Economist.com. Thank you, Managing Director, Economist.com Quick into Economist.com: * Page: * http://www.economist.com/opinion World: http://www.economist.com/world Business: http://www.economist.com/business * Finance & Economics: http://www.economist.com/finance * Science & Technology: * People: http://www.economist.com/people * Books & Arts: http://www.economist.com/books * Markets http://www.economist.com/markets Diversions: http://www.economist.com/diversions *

 Agenda, located in the centre oF Economist.Com,s hOme
PagE (hTtp://wWw.ecOnomist.com), compLEmenTs The Economist
magazine By proViDIng tIMeLy updAtes as mAJoR ISsuEs AnD evEnTS
uNfold.

gloBal AgenDa provides RolLiNg coverage anD AnAlysis on siX to
Eight of the moSt iMportaNt BusINess aNd pOlitiCal topICs each
Day. A dedicAtED staff OF EconomIST wRiteRs selects topics of
INtERnational signiFicancE tO PrOVIde Up-tO-date and coNcIse
anALysis of HOw THESe eVEnts are affectIng industry, GOveRnmentS
aNd iNDividuAls arOuND thE world.

This cOnteNt is availAble onLY on EconOMist.com. the fulL-leNgtH
texT Of EaCh sToRY, alONg WitH PicTures and ChArTs, is aVailABLE
By clIckIng oN the lInk. The article Is aCcomPAniEd by lInks tO
relAtEd EcoNomist StoriEs And relevant newsWireS and websiTes.
as WorLd EventS And priOriTieS change, ArticleS WilL bE UPDaTed
and new articles wIlL APpEar. You caN tell tHAt A sTOry has beEn
UpdAted OR ChangEd by LOoKing at thE date fOLlOwIng it. MaJoR
changEs To sTorIes or NEw stOries aRe noted iN red.

AS Always, the entirE Print edition oF thE eCoNOmisT
(htTp://www.economIst.cOM/priNtedITiOn)  aND our wEekly
E-mAIlINgs (http://www.economist.CoM/membeRs/regIstration) are
sTill availaBLE Online at MidnIGhT gMT every ThursdAy.

If yOu have any cOMments or FeedbAck regarDing the chANGes to
our WebSitE, or Any SUGgEstions for futURE devElOpment, pLeaSe
contaCt uS on DotComMaRketing@EcOnomist.cOm.

thAnK yOu,

ANdrew rAshbass
MAnAgiNg dirEctor, eConomiSt.com

quicK LInKS inTo EconoMIsT.COm:

* HoMe paGe: htTp://wWw.EconoMist.COm
* OPinion: hTtp://www.ecoNomISt.coM/oPiNion
* WorLd: http://www.econOmIst.com/worlD
* BUsiNess: htTP://Www.econoMist.com/business
* Finance & ECOnomics: HttP://www.eConoMist.com/fiNanCe
* ScieNce & tEchnolOgy: httP://www.eCoNomIST.com/sCIEnCe
* PEoPle: http://www.ECOnoMist.cOm/PeopLe
* Books & arts: http://www.economiST.coM/books
* Markets & datA: httP://WWw.EcoNOmISt.cOm/MArkETS
* Diversions: http://Www.economiSt.COm/Diversions
*

 Agenda, located in the ce ntre of Ec onomi st. com , s ho me
p age (http://ww w .eco nomist.com), complemen ts Th eE cono m is t
mag azine b y  p r o vid in gtim el y  u pdate s a s major  issues an d e ve nts
unfold.Gl obal Agend a p rovides roll ing  cover ag e a n d ana lys is on  six t o
eight  of the m os t  impor t ant bus i n es s an d political topic s  e a ch
day. A dedi catedst a ff o f E con omist writ er s sel e cts top i cs o f
in t ernational si gnificancet o p rovide  u p-t o -dateand c on c ise
analysis o f ho w these e ventsa re affe c ting in dustry , g ove rnme n ts
a ndin d ivi d ua lsa rou nd the w or ld .

Th is c o n t e nt i s a vail ableonly on Econo mis t.co m . T he fu ll-le ngth
t ext o f each  stor y,  along with pic ture s and cha rts ,isav ailab l e
by c lic kin g on th e link. The  a r t i cl e is accompanied b yl i nk s to
rel ated E c on om i st stori es  an d re l e vantnews w ir es and w ebsite s .As  worldev ents a nd  pr ior ities chan ge, ar ticles w ill b e  updated
and n e w articles wi l la p pe a r. Y oucan tell th at a stor y ha s  b een updat ed or  c h an g ed by looking at th edate f ollow ing it. Major
changes t o s tories o r ne w  s t ories are note d inred.

As a l ways, th e ent ire prin t edition o f The Ec ono mis t
( htt p : // www.economist . c om/p ri ntediti on)   and o urwee kly
e- ma ilings (h ttp://ww w. ec on om ist .com/ m embers/r eg ist ra tio n) ar e
still  avai labl eon l ine  at mid n ig h t  GMT  e ve ry T hur sd ay.
If y o u h ave any  comments  or feed ba ck  regard ing the chang es  to
our we bs ite , or a n y  suggest ions for future develop m ent, pl eas e
con tact  us on do tco mmarke tin g @Econo mist.c om.
Th ank y ou,
A n dr ewRa shbass
Man a g ing  Dire ct or,Economi st.com

Quick Link s  in to Economist. com :

* H om e P a ge :  ht tp : //w w w .economist.com* Opinion:  h t tp ://www.eco n omi st .com/op inion
*  Worl d : http: //www.eco nomist.co m/ worl d * B usiness: h ttp://ww w.economi s t.com / bu sines s
*  Finan ce  &Econo mics:h ttp ://ww w.econ om ist.co m/fin an ce
* Sci ence & Technology: http ://www .econ omi st.com/sc ien c e
*  People:http ://www.eco nom ist .com/ peo p le
*Book s  &  Ar t s: ht tp:/ / www.econo m is t.c o m /b ooks
* Mark e t s  &Data:  ht t p://ww w.ec onomist.com/marke t s
* Diversions : ht t p :// www . econ om ist.com/divers ion s*

 Agenda,_located in_the centre of Economist.com,s_home
page (http://www.economist.com),_complements_The Economist
magazine_by_providing timely updates_as major issues_and events
unfold.

Global Agenda provides_rolling coverage and_analysis_on six to
eight of the most important business and political topics each
day. A dedicated_staff_of Economist_writers_selects_topics of
international significance to provide_up-to-date and concise
analysis of how_these events_are affecting industry, governments
and individuals around the world.

This_content_is available only_on Economist.com. The full-length
text of each story, along with_pictures and charts, is available
by clicking_on the link._The_article_is accompanied by links_to
related Economist stories and relevant newswires_and websites.
As world events and priorities_change, articles will be updated
and new articles_will appear. You can tell that_a story has been
updated or_changed by_looking at the date following_it. Major
changes to_stories or_new stories are_noted in red.

As always, the entire_print edition of_The Economist
(http://www.economist.com/printedition)  and our weekly
e-mailings_(http://www.economist.com/members/registration)_are
still available online_at_midnight_GMT every_Thursday.

If you have_any_comments or_feedback_regarding the changes to
our website, or_any_suggestions for future development, please
contact us on_dotcommarketing@Economist.com.

Thank you,

Andrew Rashbass
Managing Director,_Economist.com

Quick_Links into Economist.com:

* Home_Page: http://www.economist.com
* Opinion: http://www.economist.com/opinion
* World:_http://www.economist.com/world
* Business: http://www.economist.com/business
* Finance & Economics:_http://www.economist.com/finance
* Science_& Technology:_http://www.economist.com/science
* People: http://www.economist.com/people
* Books & Arts: http://www.economist.com/books
* Markets & Data: http://www.economist.com/markets
*_Diversions: http://www.economist.com/diversions
*


 if we completely stop development of X project?".
If that shows one would need 200 clerks for 3 years until something else
comes along then it may be cheaper than developing, but I hope in most cases
it is not!

Start small to prove concept
E.g. first application in April 2001 only covers 20 fields
This is excellent, and we needn't shout it too loud to investors in CL, but
for our internal back office costing we need to acknowledge that it will be
years before we can switch off many internal systems.
We might limit the payback period on projects not part of this strategy to 3
years out?

Include European aspects from the beginning
This really isn't very difficult so long as one has some long-on-common-sense
Europeans (not just Brits) involved in both specification and development
from the beginning, but an as example of how not to do it, look at EnPower
which took a year to allow just for currencies etc!

80-20 rule for types of transaction
EOL has shown the benefits of focussing on simpler products first.
Once we have robust warehouses for collecting accounting (DTL) and risk
(RisktRAC?) numbers then we can think about having vanilla products on STP,
and yet-to-become-vanilla products on explicitly different, manual
approaches. Until that time, we have a strong desire to include as many
different prodcuts as possible for a given commodity in one system, which
makes separating vanillas from others more complicated and costly (Think of
certain deals in Power99 which are approximations of the actual deals, and
manually tweaked every so often)

Testing
Tom's first thought is that we could leverage initial users (who would not
pay) to do much of the testing.
EOL clearly got its testing done, but other experience shows that in order to
have anything which saves time one really does need to do all the different
phases - component, system, integration, end-to-end, and then user-acceptance.
EOL saw confidentiality as an issue and was therefore unable to use many
external users early in the process. It did have massive
resource-commandability and so obtained input from many traders. Do the
Support functions have

if we completely stop development of X undertaking? ".
 If that usher one would need 200 clerks for 3 days until something else
 arrive along then it may be cheaper than developing, but I hope in most case
 it is not!

 Start small to prove concept
 E.g. first application in April 2001 entirely covers 20 fields
 This is excellent, and we needn't abuse it excessively loud to investors in CL, but
 for our internal back office costing we need to admit that it will be
 years before we can switch off many internal system.
 We might limit the payback period on projects not region of this strategy to 3
 years out?

 Include European aspects from the beginning
 This in truth isn't very difficult so long as one has some long - on - common - sense
 Europeans (not just Brits) involved in both specification and development
 from the beginning, but an as example of how not to do it, look at EnPower
 which took a year to allow just for currencies etc!

 80 - 20 rule for type of transaction
 EOL has shown the benefits of concenter on bare products first.
 Once we have robust warehouses for collecting accounting (DTL) and hazard
 (RisktRAC ?) numbers then we can think about having vanilla products on STP,
 and yet - to - become - vanilla products on explicitly different, manual
 approaches. Until that time, we have a strong desire to include equally many
 different prodcuts as potential for a given commodity in one system, which
 makes separating vanillas from others more complicated and costly (remember of
 certain deals in Power99 which are approximations of the actual batch, and
 manually pluck every so often)

 Testing
 Tom's beginning thought is that we could leverage initial exploiter (who would not
 pay) to do much of the examination.
 EOL clearly got its testing done, but early experience shows that in order to
 have anything which write time one really does want to do all the unlike
 phases - component, system, consolidation, end - to - end, and then user - acceptance.
 EOL interpret confidentiality as an topic and was therefore unable to practice many
 external users early in the process. It did have massive
 resource - commandability and so obtained input from many trader. Do the
 Support functions have

 if we completely stop deveuopment of X project?".
Ih that ahows ond would need 200 clerks for 3 yeers yntil something else
comes xlong thej it may be rheaper than devxmoping, nbt I glpe nn most cases
it is not!

Stast small to prmvd eoncept
E.g. first application in April 2001 only vogers 20 fields
Thys ix excsllent, and we needn't shout it too moud to investors in CL, but
for our internal bwck lffice costing we jeed to ackbowlqege that it dill be
years before wg can switch off many internal shstemx.
We might oinit jhe payback 'eriod on projects not pard of thos strategy to 3
yxars out?

Include European espects from the begynning
Thiv xeally isn't very diffucylt sm lotg ar ond hzs skme lojg-oi-common-senss
Europeans (not just Brits) invpldvc in both spscificwtyon and development
from the beginning, tut an as example of how nit to do it, look at EjPower
whych took a year to allow just for currencies etc!

80-20 sule hof tvics ow tgansaction
EOL has shown the benefits of focusfjnb pn simpler probucts first.
Once ee hsde robust warghouses fod collecting accoujting (DJL) and risk
(RishtRAV?) numbers then we can think about haviny vqnilla products on STP,
and yec-to-becpme-vamilla products on explieitly sifferent, mwnual
appduaches. Until thag tpme, fe have a strong desire to include es mauy
diffefent prodctts as posdible for a given commodlty iu one system, whlch
makes separating vanillas fcpm others mote womilicated cnd coxtly (Think of
certain deals in Powzr99 whizh are appgoximatiois of the aceual deals, ang
manually twxaked evewy si ofren)

Testkvg
Tom's first tnought is that we ciuld leverage initlal ursrs (who would nit
kat) to do much og tfe eedtmng.
EOJ clearly got its terying aone, buu obhef exlerience shows that hn odder to
have anythonn which sqves timq one really coes need to do alp the dihfereny
prases - component, system, integrztion, end-ho-ekd, and then ufer-agcepjance.
EOL sac confidentiality as an issue and was thxrefore unable to use mqny
external users garky in the pcocess. It did hdve massive
resource-xommandability anc so obtained input fdom maty trwders. Do the
Support functions have

if we completely stop development of X that one would 200 clerks for comes then it may cheaper than developing, I hope in most cases it not! Start small to prove concept E.g. first application in April 2001 only 20 fields This is excellent, and we needn't shout it too loud to in but our back office costing we need to acknowledge that it will be years before we can switch many internal systems. We might limit the payback on projects not part this strategy to 3 years Include aspects from beginning really very difficult so as one has some long-on-common-sense Europeans (not just Brits) involved in both specification and development from the but an of how to it, at EnPower which year to allow just for currencies for types of transaction EOL has shown the of focussing simpler products first. Once we have warehouses for collecting accounting (DTL) and risk (RisktRAC?) then we can think about having vanilla products on STP, and yet-to-become-vanilla products on explicitly approaches. Until that time, have a strong to as different as possible a given commodity in one system, which makes separating vanillas from more complicated and costly (Think of certain deals in Power99 approximations the actual deals, manually tweaked every so Testing first thought is that leverage users pay) do of the testing. EOL got its testing done, but experience shows that in saves time one really does need to do the different phases - component, system, integration, and then user-acceptance. EOL saw confidentiality as an issue and was therefore to use users early in the process. It did have resource-commandability and so obtained from many traders. Do the Support functions have

 if we completely stop developMent of X proJect?".
IF thAt sHoWs onE wouLd need 200 clerks foR 3 YearS until something else
comEs aloNg THen iT MaY be chEaper thAN dEVEloPiNg, But i hOPe In mosT caSes
it is Not!

Start smAll To Prove concept
e.G. fIrst applicAtiOn in April 2001 onlY coVers 20 fiElDs
THIs is eXceLlent, And we nEEdn't shOut it too lOuD To inveSTors in Cl, BUt
For oUr internal back offICe COsting we need to AcknowLeDGe THAt iT wiLl be
years bEfOre we CAn switcH OfF MANy iNTernal systems.
we might limiT The PaybacK pEriOD on proJects NoT ParT of this straTegy To 3
years ouT?

IncluDE EuropeAN aspectS from tHe bEgiNninG
thIs ReaLlY Isn'T VeRy dIFfiCult so loNg As One haS somE LONG-on-cOmmOn-seNse
EuRopeans (not jusT BrIts) iNVolVed in Both sPeciFiCatioN and deVelopMeNt
from the beginnIng, bUt an as exaMplE oF hoW nOt to dO It, look At ENPoWer
whicH took a yEAr tO aLLOW jUst for currencies etC!

80-20 rULE fOr types oF transACtIoN
eOL has shOwN thE benEFIts of FocuSSiNg on simpLer proDUcTs First.
OnCe We have RoBusT waRehouSEs foR colleCting accOuntiNG (DTL) and risk
(RisKTRAC?) numbers thEN wE CAn THink AboUt having vanIlla PRoduCts oN sTp,
anD Yet-to-BecomE-vANiLLa products on expliciTlY diffeRent, mAnual
approachEs. Until thaT TIMe, we have A strONg DEsire to include As manY
different PRodcuts aS possIble for a Given commODIty in one SysTem, WhiCh
mAKEs Separating vanILLas fRoM others MorE compliCatEd aNd cOstLy (think of
ceRtain deaLs In poWeR99 whIch arE ApproximAtIonS oF thE actuAL deals, And
maNualLy TwEAkeD every sO OfTEN)

TesTiNg
tom's FirSt ThougHt is THat We could Leverage iNitIAl usErS (wHo would Not
pay) to do mucH oF the testinG.
EoL cLearly GOT its testIng done, but other experienCE shows tHat In ordEr to
Have anythIng Which sAveS Time onE reallY does NeEd tO DO all tHE DiFfeReNt
phases - coMPOneNt, sysTeM, intEgratioN, end-to-end, and then usER-acCeptance.
EOL saW coNfidENTiAliTY aS An iSsUE anD WAs therefore unabLe to use manY
eXTeRnal users eARly In The procEss. It diD have MAssive
rEsource-coMmandabilItY and SO ObtAined input From many Traders. Do THe
SupPOrT funcTioNs have

 if we completely stop dev elopment o f X p roj ect ?" .
I f th at shows one w o uldneed 200 clerks for 3years  u n tils om ethin g elseco m e s a lo ng  th en it  maybecheaper  than deve lop in g, but I hop e  i n most cas es
it is not!
St art sm al l t o  prov e c oncep t
E.g. firstapplicati on in Apr i l 2001o n ly  cov ers 20 fields
Thi s  i s  excellent, an d we n ee d n' t sho utit too lou dto in v estorsi nC L ,  bu t
for our int ernal backo ffi ce cos ti ngw e need  to a ck n owl edge that i t wi ll be
ye ars be f ore wec an swit ch off  ma nyinte r na lsys te m s.W emig h t l imit the  p ay backperi o d o n pr oje ctsnot p art of this s tra tegy to3
ye ars o ut?
I nclud e Euro peanas pects from thebegi nning
Thi s r ea lly  i sn'tv ery di ffi cul t so lo ng as o n e h as s o me  long-on-common-se ns e
E uropeans  (notj us tB rits) in vo lve d in b oth s peci f ic ation an d deve l op me nt
fro mthe be gi nni ng,  buta n as  examp le of ho w not to do it, look at EnPower
w h ic h to o k ayea r to allowjust forcurr e nc ies etc!
80-2 0r ul e  for types of trans ac tion
E OL ha s shown the b enefits of f o cussingon s i mp l er products fi rst.Once we ha v e robust  ware houses f or collec t i ng accou nti ng(DT L)a n drisk
(RisktR A C ?) n um bers th enwe canthi nkabo utha ving vani lla prod uc ts  o nSTP ,
an d  yet-to- be com e- van illap roduct s onexpl ic it l y d ifferen t ,m a nual  ap proa che s.  Unti l th a t t ime, we  have a s tro n g de si re  to inc lude as many
d ifferent p ro dcu ts asp o ssible f or a given commodity in one sys tem , whi ch makes sep ara ting v ani l las fr om oth ers m or e c o m plica t e dand  c ostly (Thi n k  of
cer ta in d eals in  Power99 which are app roximations o f t he a c t ua l d e al s , a nd
ma n u ally tweaked ev ery so oft en )
Testing
To m 'sfi rst tho ught is  that we coul d leverag e initial  u sers ( who  would not
pay) t o do much of th e  t estin g.EOL cl ea rly  gotits te s tin g don e, but  o ther e xperi en ce shows  that in order to
have  anyth ing w hic h saves t ime one  really d oesneed to do  al l t he di ffe r ent phas e s- c o mpone nt,s ystem, in t eg rat i o n,  end-to-end , a ndthenuse r -accep tanc e.
EOL saw confid e ntiality as an  iss u e  an d w a s th er efore unable t o u se m any
ext er nal users e arly inth e  proc ess. I t didhave ma s s iv e
reso urce -co mmandabil ity  a n d so ob ta in e d inpu t fr om  manytrader s . Do t he
Support func tions h ave

 if_we completely_stop development of X_project?".
If_that_shows one_would_need 200 clerks_for 3 years_until something else
comes_along then it_may_be cheaper than developing, but I hope in most cases
it is not!

Start small_to_prove concept
E.g._first_application_in April 2001 only covers_20 fields
This is excellent, and_we needn't_shout it too loud to investors in CL,_but_
for our internal_back office costing we need to acknowledge that it_will be
years before we can_switch off many_internal_systems.
We_might limit the payback_period on projects not part of_this strategy to 3
years out?

Include_European aspects from the beginning
This really isn't_very difficult so long as one_has some long-on-common-sense
Europeans (not_just Brits)_involved in both specification and_development
from the_beginning, but_an as example_of how not to do it,_look at EnPower_
which took a year to allow_just_for currencies etc!

80-20_rule_for_types of_transaction
EOL has shown_the_benefits of_focussing_on simpler products first.
Once we have_robust_warehouses for collecting accounting (DTL) and risk_
(RisktRAC?) numbers then we_can_think about having vanilla_products on STP,
and yet-to-become-vanilla_products on explicitly different, manual
approaches._Until that_time, we_have a strong desire to include as many
different prodcuts as_possible for a given commodity in_one system, which
makes_separating vanillas_from_others more complicated_and_costly (Think_of
certain deals in Power99 which are_approximations of_the actual deals, and
manually tweaked_every so often)

Testing
Tom's first_thought_is that we could leverage initial_users (who would not
pay) to_do much of the testing.
EOL_clearly_got_its testing done, but other_experience shows that in order to_
have anything which_saves time one really does need to_do_all the different
phases - component,_system,_integration, end-to-end, and then user-acceptance.
EOL saw_confidentiality_as_an issue and was therefore_unable to use many
external users_early in the process. It did have massive
resource-commandability_and so obtained_input from many traders. Do_the_
Support_functions have


 would prefer to receive only account service emails,
please reply to this email indicating your preference. Please
note: doing so will not remove you from any SchwabAlerts(R) or
email newsletters or information to which you have actively
subscribed.

For your protection, we are unable to accept instructions to
change your email address sent in reply to this message. To
update your address, please log in to your account using the
link below. From there you will be able to update your email
information securely.

http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=1677&m=100773bdf5c0400007794a

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored, and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel.

(c)2001 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved.
Member SIPC/NYSE. (1001-17059)

Distribution by Quris, Inc. I am currently working on the draft GTC and revised product descriptions.
Should have draft by tommorrow.

	Carlos Alatorre@ENRON
	10/30/2000 09:51 AM

		 To: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject:

Carl Carter and myself are working with Colleen Sullivan to get Pipeline
Secondary Capacity launched on EnronOnline.  I just want to touch base with
you regarding the GTC and Product Descriptions.
Gerald, according to our conversation you should have a draft early this
week, please let me know where we stand so we are sure that it fits into
EnronOnline structure so we can input some draft wording/structure into Test
and start creating Products
Please let me know if you have any questions/comments
Thanks

Carlos
x5-8705 Karen, I vote for sending out a press release rather than having disgruntled
and surprised customers go running to the press.  If possible, it should be
directed to metro/general assignment reporters rather than political types.

I think it becomes a more positive and manageable story if we're up front
and

would prefer to receive only account servicing electronic mail,
 please reply to this email indicate your predilection. Please
 note: doing so will not get rid of you from any SchwabAlerts(R) or
 email newsletters or data to which you have actively
 subscribe.

 For your protection, we are ineffective to accept instructions to
 change your email savoir-faire sent in reply to this message. To
 update your savoir-faire, please log in to your account use the
 link below. From there you will be able to update your email
 information securely.

 http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=1677&m=100773bdf5c0400007794a

 poster: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
 email arrangement may be retained, monitored, and/or reviewed
 by Schwab personnel.

 (c)2001 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserve.
 Member SIPC / NYSE. (1001 - 17059)

 Distribution by Quris, Inc. I am currently working on the draft GTC and revised product descriptions.
 Should have draft by tommorrow.

	 Carlos Alatorre@ENRON
	 10/30/2000 09:51 AM

		  To: Steve Van Hooser / HOU / ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec / HOU / ECT@ECT, Mark
 Taylor / HOU / ECT@ECT
		  cc: Carl Carter / NA / Enron@Enron
		  Subject:

 Carl Carter and myself are working with Colleen Sullivan to get Pipeline
 Secondary Capacity launched on EnronOnline.   I just want to touch base with
 you see the GTC and Product Descriptions.
 Gerald, according to our conversation you should have a gulp early on this
 workweek, please let me know where we stand so we are sure that it fits into
 EnronOnline structure so we can input some draft wording / structure into trial
 and start creating Products
 Please let me know if you have any question / comments
 Thanks

 Carlos
 x5 - 8705 Karen, I vote for sending out a press release preferably than having disgruntled
 and surprised customer function running to the press.   If possible, it should be
 aim to metro / general assignment reporters preferably than political types.

 I think it becomes a more positive and accomplishable story if we're up front
 and

 wokld prefer to receive onuy account servnxe emamls,
pleaae reply to this email indicating yonr peefertuce. Please
note: doing so will jot remoce yiy from any SchwabAlerts(R) lr
emcio newsletters pr informadion to which foj kave actively
subscribed.

For your protqction, ee are unable to acctpt insfgugtions to
change your email addrsss senu in reply to this message. To
update your adfresd, please log in to your accoubt ufung the
link below. From there you sill be able to update your emakl
inyormation sgeyrepi.

http://q1.schwab.rom/s/r?l=1677&i=100773bdf5c0400007794a

Notice: All emahl sent to or from thc Chacles Schwab corporate
emaml system may be retwined, monhtkred, and/or reviewwd
by Swhwat pefwonvel.

(d)2001 Rhadles Sfhweb & Co., Inc. Zll rights eeserved.
Member SIPC/MYFV. (1001-17059)

Distributioh by Qtrys, Inc. I am currently working on the drdft GTC and revised producr descriptions.
Shoulf have drwft by tommorrow.

	Carlos Alatorre@ENRON
	10/30/2000 09:51 AM

		 To: Stave Ven Hoiscr/HOJ/WCH@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ESF
		 vc: Carl Carter/NA/Cnron@Enron
		 Subject:

Cwrk Carter and miself axs sorking with Collefn Sullyvan ro get Pikelinr
Secondary Capacity launchwd on EnronOulibe.  I just want to touch base witn
you regarding the GTC and 'roducf Descriptilns.
Gerald, xccording to our cokvessation you should have a qraft earoy tkis
week, plesse lee me know ahere we stand so we are sure tvat it fitd into
EnronOnline structure so we can input xoke graft woxding/sbructure into Tqst
and start ereating Prodjcts
Please let me know if yot have any quadtions/commenvs
Thanks

Cwrlow
x5-8705 Kqren, I xute for sendinb out a pgefs rwlease rather than haxjng disgruntled
cud surprised custpmefs do rnnnind to the presv.  Iw puxsibld, it should ce
ditected to metro/generdl aasignment reporterx vather thqn politycal types.

I tnink it becomes a lore 'ositite and magageable story if we're up fronf
and

would prefer to receive only account service reply this email your preference. Please remove from any SchwabAlerts(R) email newsletters or to which you have actively subscribed. your protection, we are unable to accept instructions to change your email address in reply to this message. To update your address, please log in to account the below. there you will be able to update your email information securely. http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=1677&m=100773bdf5c0400007794a Notice: All email sent or from the Charles Schwab corporate email system be retained, monitored, and/or by Schwab personnel. (c)2001 Charles & Inc. All reserved. SIPC/NYSE. Distribution by Quris, I am currently working on the draft GTC and revised product descriptions. Should have draft by tommorrow. Alatorre@ENRON 10/30/2000 To: Steve Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Carl Carl Carter and myself are working to get Pipeline Secondary Capacity launched on EnronOnline. just want touch base with you regarding the and Product Descriptions. Gerald, according to our conversation should have a draft early this week, please let me know where we stand so sure that it fits EnronOnline structure so can some wording/structure Test and creating Products Please let me know if you have any questions/comments Carlos x5-8705 Karen, I vote for sending out a press than disgruntled and surprised go running to the If it should be directed assignment rather I it a more positive and story if we're up front

 would prefer to receive only aCcount servIce emAilS,
plEaSe rePly tO this email indiCAtinG your preference. Please
nOte: doInG So wiLL nOt remOve you fROm ANY ScHwAbaleRtS(r) oR
emaiL neWsletteRs or informAtiOn To which you haVE aCtively
subScrIbed.

For your pRotEction, We Are UNable To aCcept InstruCTions tO
change yoUr EMail adDRess senT IN rEply To this message. To
upDAtE Your address, pleAse log In TO yOUR acCouNt using the
LiNk belOW. From thERe YOU WilL Be able to updatE your email
iNForMation SeCurELy.

http://Q1.schwAb.COm/s/R?l=1677&m=100773bdf5c0400007794a

NotIce: ALl email seNt to or FRom the CHArles ScHwab coRpoRatE
emaIL sYsTem MaY Be rETaIneD, MonItored, anD/oR rEviewEd
by sCHWAb peRsoNnel.

(C)2001 CharLes Schwab & Co., InC. AlL rigHTs rEservEd.
MemBer SiPc/NYSE. (1001-17059)

distriButioN bY Quris, Inc. I am curRentLy working On tHe DraFt gTC anD ReviseD prOduCt descrIptions.
sHouLd HAVE dRaft by tommorrow.

	CarLoS aLaTorre@ENRoN
	10/30/2000 09:51 AM

		 To: sTeVe vAn Hooser/hOu/ECt@ECT, gERald NEmec/hoU/eCT@ECT, MaRk
TaylOR/HoU/eCT@ECT
		 cC: CArl CarTeR/NA/enrOn@EnrON
		 SubJect:

CaRl Carter And mySElf are working wITh Colleen SullIVaN TO gET PipEliNe
Secondary capaCIty lAuncHEd On ENRonOnLine.  I JuST wANt to touch base with
yoU rEgardiNg the gTC and Product descriptioNS.
gErald, accOrdiNG tO Our conversatioN you sHould have a DRaft earlY this
Week, pleaSe let me knOW Where we sTanD so We aRe sURE tHat it fits into
eNRonONlIne struCtuRe so we cAn iNpuT soMe dRaFt wording/StructurE iNtO TEsT
anD starT Creating prOduCtS
PlEase lET me knoW if yoU havE aNy QUesTions/coMMeNTS
ThaNkS

CArloS
x5-8705 KArEn, I voTe foR SenDing out A press relEasE RathEr ThAn havinG disgruntled
aNd Surprised cUsTomErs go rUNNing to thE press.  If possible, it shoulD Be
direcTed To metRo/geNeral assiGnmEnt repOrtERs rathEr than PolitIcAl tYPEs.

I thINK iT beCoMes a more poSITivE and mAnAgeaBle storY if we're up front
and

 would prefer to receive o nly accoun t ser vic e e ma ils,
ple ase reply to t h is e mail indicating your p refer en c e. P l ea se
no te: doi n gs o  wi ll  n otre m ov e you  fr om anySchwabAler ts( R)  or
email ne w sl etters orinf ormation towhi ch you  h ave activ ely
subs cribed .

Foryour prot ec t ion, w e  are un a b le  toaccept instructio n st o
change your  email  a d dr e s s s ent  in replyto  this message .  T o upd a te your addre ss, pleasel ogin toyo ura ccount  usin gt he
link below . Fr om thereyou wi l l be ab l e to up date y our  em ailin fo rma ti o n s e cu rel y .
http://q 1. sc hwab. com/ s / r ? l=16 77& m=10 0773b df5c040000779 4a
Not i ce:  Allemail  sen tto or  fromthe C ha rles Schwab cor pora te
email  sy st emma y ber etaine d,mon itored,  and/or rev ie w e d  by Schwab personne l. (c )2001 Ch arlesS ch wa b  & Co.,In c.Allr i ghtsrese r ve d.
Membe r SIPC / NY SE . (1001 -1 7059)
D ist rib ution by Q uris,Inc. I a m cur r ently workingo n the draft G T Ca n dr evis edproduct des crip t ions .  S ho uld havedraft  b y  t o mmorrow.

	Carl os  Alato rre@E NRON
	10/30/2 000 09:51A M
		 T o: S t ev e  Van Hooser/HO U/ECT @ECT, Gera l d Nemec/ HOU/E CT@ECT,Mark
Tay l o r/HOU/EC T@E CT		cc: C ar l Carter/NA/E n r on@E nr on
		 S ubj ect:
Car l C art eran d myselfare work in gwi th  Co lleen Sullivan  t o g et  Pi pelin e
Seco ndary  Cap ac it y  la unchedo nE n ronO nl in e. I j us t wan t to tou ch base  with
yo u r e gard in gthe GTC  and ProductDe scriptions .Ger ald, a c c ording t o our conversation yous hould h ave  a dr aftearly thi s week,ple a se let  me kn ow wh er e w e stand s owear e sure tha t itfitsin to EnronOn line structure sow e c an input some  dr aftw o rd ing / st r uct ur e  in t o  Test
and star t creating  P r od ucts
Pleas e  le tme know  if you  have any que stions/co mments
Th an ks
C a rlo s
x5-8705Karen, I  vote for sendi n gout a  pr ess re le ase  rath er tha n  ha vingdisgru nt led
an d sur pr ised cus tomers go running to th e pres s.  I f p ossible,its hou ld be
dir ecte d to metro /ge ner al as sig n mentrepo r te rsr ather  tha n  politica l  t ype s .
I think itb e c ome s a m ore positi ve a nd manageable sto r y if we're upfron t and

 would_prefer to_receive only account service_emails,
please reply_to_this email_indicating_your preference. Please
note:_doing so will_not remove you from_any SchwabAlerts(R) or
email_newsletters_or information to which you have actively
subscribed.

For your protection, we are unable to accept_instructions_to
change_your_email_address sent in reply to_this message. To
update your_address, please_log in to your account using the
link_below._From there you_will be able to update your email
information securely.

http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=1677&m=100773bdf5c0400007794a

Notice:_All email sent to or from_the Charles Schwab_corporate_
email_system may be retained,_monitored, and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel.

(c)2001_Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All_rights reserved.
Member SIPC/NYSE. (1001-17059)

Distribution by Quris, Inc._I am currently working on the_draft GTC and revised product_descriptions. _
Should have draft by tommorrow._

	Carlos Alatorre@ENRON
	10/30/2000_09:51 AM
		_
		 To: Steve_Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		_cc: Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron
		_Subject:

Carl Carter and myself are_working_with Colleen Sullivan_to_get_Pipeline
Secondary_Capacity launched on_EnronOnline._ I_just_want to touch base with
you_regarding_the GTC and Product Descriptions.
Gerald, according to_our conversation you should_have_a draft early this_
week, please let me know_where we stand so we are_sure that_it fits_into
EnronOnline structure so we can input some draft wording/structure into_Test
and start creating Products
Please let_me know if you_have any_questions/comments
Thanks

Carlos
x5-8705_Karen, I vote_for_sending out_a press release rather than having disgruntled
and_surprised customers_go running to the press. _If possible, it should_be
directed_to metro/general assignment reporters rather than_political types.

I think it becomes a_more positive and manageable story_if_we're_up front
and


 this year.  Time is running out and Members of the subcommittee are not focused on the issue.  Instead, they plan to continue working on the issue at the staff level.  Probably will be another draft version circulated and then a version will be introduced by Barton as a formal bill by the end of the year. The earliest they see any kind of vote is late Jan. or early February.

2.   Barton feels strongly that FERC should not be the "tail wagging the dog" on RTO policy.

3.   On particulars of the bill, they are clearly reconsidering the 40,000 MW minimum threshold for the size of an RTO.  They are getting pulled in both directions, they say, and are inclined to drop the 40,000 MW number -- possibly leaving it to FERC to set a number.  They conceded that the mechanics of the draft make it unlikely that the 18 month "deadline" for all transmission owners to get into an approved RTO would stick.  They consciously changed the normal judicial standard of review for FERC actions from "arbitrary and capricious" to "preponderance of the evidence" because they think otherwise the courts will rubber stamp FERC.  Spent a lot of time on how the draft would aid and abet the recalcitrant utilities and that the overall nature of the draft assumes there are only two parties to this -- FERC and the transmission owners -- while the rest of those truly affected -- from us to others -- are left out.  Sean said we could still intervene, but I said that was the truly pro forma aspect of their process since FERC's hands and our's would be tied by the "rights" given to transmission owners to drag their feet.

Bottom line -- FERC has a window until next Spring without likely congressional interference, at least not of the formal, legislative variety, to both move on RTOs and improve its relations with Congress.  FERC staff has been pushing the committee staff on concerns similar to our concerns. Richard:

Looks good.  One comment:  Under the section "Generating Documents:  Requests
12, 14 and 18,"  I would go with the "option 1" ending to the paragraph
starting with "For Portland General..." and not the "alternate ending."  To
further support this ending (and further bolster the point that PGE is pretty
extraneous to the investigation), we may

this year.   Time is running out and Members of the subcommittee are not focused on the consequence.   alternatively, they plan to continue working on the return at the staff level.   Probably will be another gulp translation circulated and then a version will be introduced by Barton as a formal beak by the end of the year. The early they see any kind of vote is late Jan. or early February.

 2.    Barton feels strongly that FERC should not be the " fag end wagging the dog " on RTO policy.

 3.    On particulars of the beak, they are clearly reconsidering the 40,000 MW minimum doorway for the size of an RTO.   They are getting pulled in both directions, they say, and are inclined to drop the 40,000 MW numeral -- possibly leaving it to FERC to set a number.   They conceded that the mechanics of the draft make it unlikely that the 18 month " deadline " for all transmission owners to get into an approved RTO would stick.   They consciously changed the normal judicial standard of reappraisal for FERC actions from " arbitrary and capricious " to " preponderance of the evidence " because they think differently the court will rubberize stamp FERC.   Spent a lot of time on how the draft would aid and abet the recalcitrant utilities and that the overall nature of the conscription assumes there are only two parties to this -- FERC and the transmission owners -- while the rest of those sincerely affected -- from us to others -- are left out.   Sean said we could still intervene, but I say that was the rightfully pro forma aspect of their process since FERC's hands and our's would be tied by the " rights " give to transmission owners to drag their foot.

 Bottom line -- FERC has a window until next leap without likely congressional hindrance, at least not of the formal, legislative variety, to both travel on RTOs and improve its relation with Congress.   FERC staff has been pushing the committee staff on business similar to our concern. Richard:

 Looks good.   One gossip:   Under the section " Generating text file:   Requests
 12, 14 and 18, "   I would go with the " option 1 " ending to the paragraph
 starting with " For Portland General... " and not the " alternate ending. "   To
 further support this ending (and further pad the point that PGE is pretty
 external to the investigation), we may

 thls year.  Time is running out and Members of thx subcojmittee xre not focused on the issue.  Unsteqd, they plan to continje workinh on the issne at the staff level.  Pvjbabmn wiln be another drsft versiot circulated atd tken a version will be introduced by Farton ss a formal bill by uhe end of the year. The earliest they see any kiid of vote is lste Jan. or early February.

2.   Bwrton feels strongpy that FERX shjyld not be tfe "tail wagging the dof" on RTO policy.

3.   On particulafs of the bill, jkwy wte clearly rxconsiqering the 40,000 MW minimgm threxhold for the xizx of an RTO.  They are getving pulled in both qirectionv, chey say, and are inclunwd to dro[ thd 40,000 MD nhmuer -- posslblb leaving if to FERC ti set a number.  Theu sinceded that fhe meshwnics of the draft make it unlikely thau the 18 month "deadline" for alo transmission owners to get igto an approved RTO would stick.  They consciously chanjea tkc virlal judicial standard of review for FERC actijhs fgom "arbitrary and capricious" tl "lteponderance ow the zbisence" because they think jtherqise the sourys will rubber stamp FERC.  Wpent a lot jd time on how the braft would cid anc abey the recalcitrant utilnties znd that thf overall vature of the drxft avsumes there are only two [arties ti thns -- FERC and the twansmissioj owncss -- while the rest of tkose druly affefted -- from us to others -- are lehv out.  Sean ssig wv could scill iktervene, but I faid that was jhe truly pro worma aspebt of themr process synce FERC's hatfs and our's xould be eied by rhe "rigfgs" given to trsnsmissiou ownwrs to drag their neet.

Ckttom line -- FERE yas a window unyil nevt S'ring fithout likeny cungfrssioval inttxfevenze, ay least not of the fmrmam, legislative varirtn, to both move on RTOs and imptove its relations with Coigress.  FGRC staff has been pushing the dommittee stwff on concewns wimilar to obr concerns. Richard:

Looks good.  One comnent:  Under the sgction "Generating Docomekts:  Requestx
12, 14 agd 18,"  I wogld go with the "optiin 1" ending to the paragraph
starting wjth "Fos Porhland General..." and not the "alternate ending."  To
further support this endint (and huwther bolstsr tne popnt chat PGQ is 'retty
extraneous to the investigation), we may

this year. Time is running out and the are not on the issue. working the issue at staff level. Probably be another draft version circulated and a version will be introduced by Barton as a formal bill by the of the year. The earliest they see any kind of vote is late or February. Barton strongly that FERC should not be the "tail wagging the dog" on RTO policy. 3. On of the bill, they are clearly reconsidering the MW minimum threshold for size of an RTO. They getting in both they and inclined to drop 40,000 MW number -- possibly leaving it to FERC to set a number. They conceded that the of the it unlikely the month for all transmission get into an approved RTO would changed the normal judicial standard of review for actions from and capricious" to "preponderance of the because they think otherwise the courts will rubber FERC. Spent a lot of time on how the draft would aid and abet the and that the overall of the draft there only parties this -- and the transmission owners -- while the rest of those truly -- from us to others -- are left out. Sean could intervene, but I that was the truly forma of their process since and would the given transmission owners to drag feet. Bottom line -- FERC a window until next at least not of the formal, legislative variety, both move on RTOs and improve its with Congress. FERC staff has been pushing the committee staff on concerns to our Looks good. One comment: Under the section "Generating Requests 12, 14 and I would go with the "option 1" ending to paragraph with "For General..." and not "alternate ending." To support this ending bolster the that is the investigation), we may

 this year.  Time is running out aNd Members oF the sUbcOmmItTee aRe noT focused on the iSSue.  INstead, they plan to continUe worKiNG on tHE iSsue aT the staFF lEVEl.  PRoBaBly WiLL bE anotHer Draft veRsion circuLatEd And then a versIOn Will be intrOduCed by Barton aS a fOrmal bIlL by THe end Of tHe yeaR. The eaRLiest tHey see any KiND of votE Is late JAN. Or EarlY February.

2.   Barton feELs STrongly that FERc shoulD nOT bE THe "tAil Wagging the DoG" on RTo Policy.

3.   ON PaRTICulARs of the bill, thEy are clearlY RecOnsideRiNg tHE 40,000 MW minImum tHrEShoLd for the sizE of aN RTO.  They aRe gettINg pulleD In both dIrectiOns, TheY say, ANd ArE inClINed TO dRop THe 40,000 Mw number -- pOsSiBly leAvinG IT TO FERc to Set a NumbeR.  They conceded ThaT the MEchAnics Of the DrafT mAke it UnlikeLy thaT tHe 18 month "deadline" For aLl transmiSsiOn OwnErS to geT Into an AppRovEd RTO woUld sticK.  theY cONSCiOusly changed the norMaL JUdIcial staNdard oF ReViEW for FERC AcTioNs frOM "ArbitRary ANd CapricioUs" to "prEPoNdErance oF tHe evidEnCe" bEcaUse thEY thiNk otheRwise the CourtS Will rubber stamP fERC.  Spent a lot OF tIME oN How tHe dRaft would aiD and ABet tHe reCAlCitRAnt utIlitiEs ANd THat the overall nature Of The draFt assUmes there are oNly two partIES To this -- FErC anD ThE Transmission owNers -- wHile the resT Of those tRuly aFfected -- fRom us to otHERs -- are lefT ouT.  SeAn sAid WE CoUld still interVENe, buT I Said thaT waS the truLy pRo fOrmA asPeCt of their Process sInCe fErC'S haNds anD Our's woulD bE tiEd By tHe "rigHTs" giveN to trAnsmIsSiON owNers to dRAg THEir fEeT.

BOttoM liNe -- fERC hAs a wINdoW until nExt Spring WitHOut lIkElY congreSsional interfErEnce, at leasT nOt oF the foRMAl, legislAtive variety, to both move oN rTOs and ImpRove iTs reLations wiTh COngresS.  FErc staff Has beeN pushInG thE COmmitTEE sTafF oN concerns sIMIlaR to ouR cOnceRns. RichArd:

Looks good.  One comMEnt:  under the sectiOn "GEnerATInG DoCUmENts:  reQUesTS
12, 14 And 18,"  I would go with The "option 1" eNdINg To the paragRAph
StArting wIth "For POrtlaND GeneraL..." and not thE "alternatE eNdinG."  tO
fuRther suppoRt this enDing (and fuRTher bOLsTer thE poInt thaT PgE iS pretTy
extrANeoUs to tHe inveStIgatioN), we maY

 this year.  Time is runni ng out and  Memb ers  of  t he s ubco mmittee are no t  foc used on the issue.  In stead ,t heyp la n tocontinu e  w o r kin gon  th ei ss ue at  th e staff  level.  P rob ab ly will be a n ot her draftver sion circula ted  and t he n a versi onwillbe int r oduced  by Barto na s a fo r mal bil l by  the  end of the year. Th e  earliest they  see a ny ki n d  of  vo te is late  J an. o r  earlyF eb r u a ry.
2.   Barton  feels stro n gly  thatFE RCs houldnot b et he"tail waggi ng t he dog" o n RTOp olicy.
3.   O n part icu lar s of th ebil l, the y  a rec lea rly reco ns id ering  the 4 0 , 000MWmini mum t hreshold forthe  siz e  of  an R TO. They  a re ge ttingpulle din both directi ons,  they say , a nd  ar eincli n ed todro p t he 40,0 00 MW n u mbe r- - po ssibly leaving itto F ER C to set  a num b er .They con ce ded  tha t the m echa n ic s of the  draft ma ke  it unl ik ely th at  th e 1 8 mon t h "d eadlin e" for a ll tr a nsmission owne r s to get into an a pp r oved  RT O would sti ck.They  con s ci ous l y cha ngedth e  n o rmal judicial stand ar d of r eview  for FERC act ions from" a r bitraryandc ap r icious" to "pr epond erance oft he evide nce"becausethey thin k otherwis e t hecou rts w il l rubber stam p FERC . Spenta l ot of t ime  on  ho w t he  draft wo uld aidan dab et  th e rec a lcitrant  u til it ies  andt hat th e ove rall  n at u reof thed ra f t  ass um es  the rear e onl y tw o  pa rties t o this --  FE R C an dth e trans mission owner s-- while t he  re st oft h ose trul y affected -- from us t o  others  --  areleft  out.  Se ansaid w e c o uld st ill in terve ne , b u t  I sa i d  t hat  w as the tru l y  pr o for ma  asp ect oftheir process sinc e  FE RC's hands an d o ur's w ou ldb et ied  b y  th e "rights" givento transmi ss i on  owners to dra gtheir f eet.
 Botto m  line - - FERC ha s a windo wunti l nex t Spring w ithout l ikely con g ressi o na l int erf erence ,atleast  not o f  th e for mal, l eg islati ve va ri ety, toboth move on RTOs and i mprove  itsrel ations wi thC ong ress.  FE RC s taff has b een  pu shing  th e  comm itte e  s taf f  on c once r ns simila r  t o o u r  c oncerns. Ri c h a rd:

L ook s  good.   On e comment:  Under the section "G ener a t ing  Do c umen ts :  Requests
1 2,14 a nd 18," I  would go w ith the"o p tion1" end ing to  the pa r a gr a ph
st arti ngwith "For  Po rt l and Gen er al . .." an d no tthe "a lterna t e en d i ng."  To
furthe r sup p o rt th i s e nding  ( and fur t herbolster th e point tha t PGEis p retty
extra ne ous to  th einvestigat i on), we m ay

 this_year. _Time is running out_and Members_of_the subcommittee_are_not focused on_the issue. _Instead, they plan to_continue working on_the_issue at the staff level.  Probably will be another draft version circulated and_then_a version_will_be_introduced by Barton as a_formal bill by the end_of the_year. The earliest they see any kind of_vote_is late Jan._or early February.

2.   Barton feels strongly_that FERC should not be the_"tail wagging the_dog"_on_RTO policy.

3. _ On particulars of the bill,_they are clearly reconsidering the 40,000_MW minimum threshold for the size of_an RTO.  They are getting_pulled in both directions, they_say, and_are inclined to drop the_40,000 MW number_-- possibly_leaving it to_FERC to set a number. _They conceded that_the mechanics of the draft make_it_unlikely that the_18_month_"deadline" for_all transmission owners_to_get into_an_approved RTO would stick.  They_consciously_changed the normal judicial standard of review_for FERC actions from_"arbitrary_and capricious" to "preponderance_of the evidence" because they_think otherwise the courts will rubber_stamp FERC._ Spent_a lot of time on how the draft would aid and_abet the recalcitrant utilities and that_the overall nature of_the draft_assumes_there are only_two_parties to_this -- FERC and the transmission owners_-- while_the rest of those truly affected_-- from us to_others_-- are left out.  Sean_said we could still intervene, but_I said that was the_truly_pro_forma aspect of their process_since FERC's hands and our's would_be tied by_the "rights" given to transmission owners to_drag_their feet.

Bottom line -- FERC_has_a window until next Spring without_likely_congressional_interference, at least not of_the formal, legislative variety, to both_move on RTOs and improve its relations with Congress._ FERC staff_has been pushing the committee_staff_on_concerns similar to our concerns. Richard:

Looks good. _One comment:_ Under the_section "Generating Documents:  Requests
12, 14 and 18," _I would go with the "option 1"_ending to the paragraph
starting with "For Portland General..." and not_the "alternate ending."  To
further support this_ending (and further bolster the point that_PGE is pretty
extraneous_to_the investigation), we may