 at (212)
299-2754, Matt Morano, NYMEX ACCESS Department, at (212) 299-2679, or
Brian Regan, Senior Associate General Counsel, at (212) 299-2207.

APPROVED RESOLUTION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGARDING PRICE
FLUCTUATION LIMITS FOR EXCHANGE CONTRACTS

The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors hereby

Resolves that, until further notice, the price fluctuation limit rules for
each futures contract that is listed for trading on NYMEX ACCESSc and that
has such applicable rules shall continue in effect except as amended below
with regard to market activity occurring on NYMEX ACCESSc:

The initial and subsequent price fluctuation limits (for each Exchange
futures contract that has such limits) shall be expanded to 200% of the
initial and subsequent price fluctuation limits applicable to the first two
contract months of that futures contract that have price limits under the
applicable rule.

This expanded limit (200% of the limits for the first two months with limits)
shall be applicable to all contract months for that futures contract.

In the event that such a price fluctuation limit is reached by a bona fide
bid at the high price fluctuation limit or a bona fide offer at the low price
fluctuation limit, trading on NYMEX ACCESSc shall be halted immediately
except as directed otherwise by the President or the President,s designee.
Following resumption of trading, the price limits in effect shall be 200% of
the limits applicable to RTH trading.  In the event that a limit is touched
during the last 90 minutes of a NYMEX ACCESSc session, the market shall be
halted briefly, and price limits shall be expanded thereafter

In addition, in the event that a contract trading on NYMEX ACCESSc traded for
five minutes during the NYMEX ACCESS session at a price fluctuation
limit applicable to the Regular Trading Hours session, then the RTH session
shall open with expanded price fluctuation limits as provided under the
applicable rule, even though no temporary cessation of trading occurred
during the NYMEX ACCESSc trading

at (212)
 299 - 2754, Matt Morano, NYMEX ACCESS Department, at (212) 299 - 2679, or
 Brian Regan, Senior Associate General Counsel, at (212) 299 - 2207.

 APPROVED RESOLUTION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGARDING PRICE
 FLUCTUATION LIMITS FOR EXCHANGE CONTRACTS

 The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors hereby

 purpose that, until further notification, the price fluctuation limit convention for
 each futures contract that is listed for trading on NYMEX ACCESSc and that
 have such applicable rules shall continue in effect except as amended below
 with regard to marketplace activity occurring on NYMEX ACCESSc:

 The initial and subsequent monetary value fluctuation limits (for each Exchange
 futures contract that has such limits) shall be expanded to 200% of the
 initial and subsequent price variation limits applicable to the first two
 contract months of that future contract that have price limit under the
 applicable rule.

 This expand limit (200% of the limits for the first two months with limits)
 shall be applicable to all contract calendar month for that futures contract.

 In the event that such a price fluctuation limit is reached by a bona fide
 bid at the high price fluctuation limit or a bona fide offer at the low price
 fluctuation limit, trading on NYMEX ACCESSc shall be halt immediately
 except as directed otherwise by the President or the President,s designee.
 stick to resumption of trading, the monetary value limit in effect shall be 200% of
 the limits applicable to RTH trading.   In the event that a limit is touched
 during the last 90 minutes of a NYMEX ACCESSc school term, the market shall be
 halted briefly, and price limits shall be expanded thereafter

 In summation, in the event that a contract trading on NYMEX ACCESSc traded for
 five minutes during the NYMEX ACCESS session at a monetary value fluctuation
 terminus ad quem applicable to the Regular Trading Hours session, then the RTH session
 shall open with expanded price variation limits as provided under the
 applicable rule, even though no temporary cessation of trading occurred
 during the NYMEX ACCESSc trading

 at (212)
299-2754, Matt Morano, NYMEX ACCTSS Department, at (212) 299-2679, or
Bcian Refan, Seniur Associate General Counsel, ar (212) 299-2207.

APKGOVED RESOLUTION OF TFE EXECUTPVE COMMIRTEE
ID THE BOARV OF DIRCETORS VEGARBIIG PRICE
FLUCTUAJION LIMITS XOR EXCHANGE CMNGRCCTS

The Executive Committee of the Bjard of Dlrectors herebi

Resokdes fhat, until further notice, the prics fluctlation limit rulex for
each futures contrach thwt is listed for tgading on NIJEX QCCESSc and ghat
has sleh applicabme rules shall continue in effezt exeept as amebdwd hglow
with rejard tj market actlnity ocwurring on NYMEX ACCEXSc:

Vhe unitial and subsequenv price fluctuation jimits (fos zach Exchange
futures cintrawt tvat fqs rucg kijits) sjalm be expansed to 200% of rhe
initial and subxezlrnt price flhctuatyog limits applicable to the first two
cottrzct months of that futuees contract that havg price liiits under the
applicable rule.

This expanded limit (200% of vhd lnnits wir the first two months with limits)
shall be ap[mivanle to all contrcct months for tnah gotures contracj.

In the evsnt that such a prlce flustuatuon limit is teached by a bona fide
bid qt the high iricw fluctuation limic or a bona yide ogfer st the low price
fluctuction mimit, tradijg on NYMSB ACCESSc shall ce malded immediately
except as qirected ithexwise by the Presiqent or thf President,s designee.
Flllownng rasumption lf trading, the price limits in xhfect shall bg 200% mf
nhe limitf appkicable to RTR trading.  In jhe event that a limit ia touchxd
during thq last 90 minutad of a NYMEX ACCESSc seswion, the mafyet shall be
hslted brivfjy, abd price limits shell cs expanded therzcfuee

In addition, im tfe qvvnt trdt a contracd trxdivb on VYMEX ACCESWz trsded for
five minutev duding the NYMEX ACCRSF sessiob at a pwice fluctuatoon
limit applicabpe to thx Regukar Trading Hours session, then ths RTH sesdiok
shall open rith expanded prnce fluctuation limits as provided under the
applicable role, even though no tekkorary cessatmon of trading mccurred
during the BYMEX ACCESSc tracing

at (212) 299-2754, Matt Morano, NYMEX ACCESS (212) or Brian Senior Associate General RESOLUTION THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THE BOARD OF REGARDING PRICE FLUCTUATION LIMITS FOR EXCHANGE The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors hereby Resolves that, until further the price fluctuation limit rules for each futures contract that is listed for on ACCESSc that such applicable rules shall continue in effect except as amended below with regard to market activity on NYMEX ACCESSc: The initial and subsequent price limits (for each Exchange contract that has such limits) be to 200% the and price fluctuation limits to the first two contract months of that futures contract that have price limits under the applicable This expanded of the for first months with limits) applicable to all contract months for In the event that such a price fluctuation is reached a bona fide bid at the price fluctuation limit or a bona fide offer the low price fluctuation limit, trading on NYMEX ACCESSc shall be halted immediately except as by the President or President,s designee. Following of the limits effect shall 200% of the limits applicable to RTH trading. In the event a limit is touched during the last 90 minutes of ACCESSc the market shall halted briefly, and price shall expanded thereafter In addition, event a NYMEX traded five minutes during the ACCESS session at a price limit applicable to the the RTH session shall open with expanded price limits as provided under the applicable rule, though no temporary cessation of trading occurred during the NYMEX ACCESSc trading

 at (212)
299-2754, Matt Morano, NYMEX ACCESS DePartment, at (212) 299-2679, Or
BriAn REgaN, SEnioR AssOciate General COUnseL, at (212) 299-2207.

APPROVED RESOLUTION Of THE ExEcuTIVe cOmMITTeE
OF THE boArd oF DiReCtORs RegArDING pRIcE
FLUCTuATION LIMItS FoR eXCHANGE CONTraCtS

The ExecuTivE Committee of The board oF DIreCTors hEreBy

ResOlves tHAt, untiL further nOtICe, the pRIce flucTUAtIon lImit rules for
each fUTuREs contract that Is listEd FOr TRAdiNg oN NYMEX ACCEsSC and tHAt
has suCH aPPLIcaBLe rules shall cOntinue in efFEct Except As AmeNDed belOw
witH rEGarD to market acTiviTy occurriNg on NYmeX ACCESsC:

The iniTial anD suBseQuenT PrIcE flUcTUatIOn LimITs (fOr each ExChAnGe
futUres CONTRact ThaT has Such lImits) shall be eXpaNded TO 200% of The
inItial And sUbSequeNt pricE flucTuAtion limits applIcabLe to the fiRst TwO
coNtRact mONths of ThaT fuTures coNtract tHAt hAvE PRIcE limits under the
appLiCABlE rule.

ThiS expanDEd LiMIt (200% of the lImIts For tHE First Two mONtHs with liMits)
shALl Be ApplicaBlE to all CoNtrAct MonthS For tHat futUres contRact.

IN The event that suCH a price fluctuATiON LiMIt is ReaChed by a bona Fide
BId at The hIGh PriCE flucTuatiOn LImIT or a bona fide offer at ThE low prIce
flUctuation limiT, trading on nymeX ACCESSC shaLL bE Halted immediatEly
exCept as direCTed otherWise bY the PresIdent or thE pResident,S deSigNee.
folLOWiNg resumption oF TRadiNg, The pricE liMits in eFfeCt sHalL be 200% Of
The limits ApplicabLe To rTh tRadIng.  In THe event tHaT a lImIt iS toucHEd
duriNg the Last 90 MiNuTEs oF a NYMEX acCessc seSsIoN, the MarKeT shalL be
hALteD brieflY, and price LimITs shAlL bE expandEd thereafter

IN aDdition, in tHe EveNt that A COntract tRading on NYMEX ACCESSc traDEd for
fiVe mInuteS durIng the NYMeX AcCESS sEssIOn at a pRice flUctuaTiOn
lIMIt appLICaBle To The Regular tRAdiNg HouRs SessIon, then The RTH session
shall OPen With expanded pRicE fluCTUaTioN LiMIts As PRovIDEd under the
appliCable rule, eVeN ThOugh no tempORarY cEssatioN of tradIng ocCUrred
duRing the NYmEX ACCESSC tRadiNG

 at (212)
299-2754, MattMorano, NY MEX A CCE SS& #6 1495 ; De partment, at ( 2 12)299-2679, or
Brian Re gan,Se n iorA ss ociat e Gener a lC o uns el ,at(2 1 2)  299- 220 7.

APP ROVED RESO LUT IO N OF THE EXE C UT IVE COMMIT TEE
OF THE BOAR D O F DIRE CT ORS REGAR DIN G PRI CE
FLU C TUATIO N LIMITSFO R  EXCHA N GE CONT R A CT S

T he Executive Comm i tt e e of the Board  of Di re c to r s  he reb y

Resolve sthat, until f u rt h e r  no t ice, the pric e fluctuati o n l imit r ul esf or
ea ch fu tu r escontract th at i s listedfor tr a ding on NYMEX A CCESSc  an d t hatha ssuc ha ppl i ca ble rul es shall  c on tinue  ine f f e ct e xce pt a s ame nded below
w ith  reg a rdto ma rketacti vi ty oc currin g onNY MEX ACCESSc:

T he i nitial an d s ub seq ue nt pr i ce flu ctu ati on limi ts (for eac hE x c ha nge
futures contr ac t th at has s uch li m it s) shall be  e xpa nded t o 200 % of th e
initi al and su bs equentpr ice fl uc tua tio n lim i ts a pplica ble to t he fi r st two
contra c t months of t h at f ut u rescon tract thathave pric e li m it s u n der t he
a pp l ic a ble rule.

This exp an ded li mit ( 200% of the l imits fort h e  first t wo m o nt h s with limits)
sha ll be appl i cable to  allcontract  months f o r  that fu tur escon tra c t .
In the event t hatsu ch a pr ice  fluctu ati onlim itis  reachedby a bon afi de  bid  at t h e high p ri cefl uct uatio n  limit  or a  bon afi d e o ffer at th e lowpr ic e
f luc tu ation  lim i t,trading  on NYMEX  AC C ESSc  s ha ll be h alted immedia te ly
except  a s d irecte d otherwis e by the President or t h e Presi den t,sdesi gnee.
F oll owingres u mption  of tr ading ,the p ricel i mi tsin  effect sh a l l b e 200 %of the lim its applicable toR THtrading.  Inthe  eve n t  t hat al imi ti s t o u ched
during th e last 90mi n ut es of a NY M EXAC CESSc s ession,  them arket s hall be halted br ie fly, a ndprice limi ts shall  be expan d ed th e re after

I n addi ti on,  in t he eve n t t hat a  contr ac t trad ing o nNYMEX AC CESSc traded for
fiveminute s dur ing  the NYME X A C CES S  ses sion at apri cefluct uat i on
l imit ap pli c ableto t h e Regular Tr adi n g  H ours sessio n , the n the  RT H  sessi on shall open with e x panded price f luct u a tio n l i mits  a s provided und erth e
applica bl e rule, eve n though  n o  temp orarycessat ion oft r ad i ng occ urre d during th e N YM E X ACCES Sc  t r ading

 at_(212)
299-2754,_Matt Morano, NYMEX ACCESS_Department, at_(212)_299-2679, or_
Brian_Regan, Senior Associate_General Counsel, at_(212) 299-2207.

APPROVED RESOLUTION OF_THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF_THE_BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGARDING PRICE
FLUCTUATION LIMITS FOR EXCHANGE CONTRACTS

The Executive Committee of the Board_of_Directors hereby

Resolves_that,_until_further notice, the price fluctuation_limit rules for
each futures_contract that_is listed for trading on NYMEX ACCESSc and_that_
has such applicable_rules shall continue in effect except as amended below_
with regard to market activity occurring_on NYMEX ACCESSc:

The_initial_and_subsequent price fluctuation limits_(for each Exchange
futures contract that_has such limits) shall be expanded_to 200% of the
initial and subsequent_price fluctuation limits applicable to the_first two
contract months of_that futures_contract that have price limits_under the
applicable_rule.

This expanded_limit (200% of_the limits for the first two_months with limits)_
shall be applicable to all contract_months_for that futures_contract.

In_the_event that_such a price_fluctuation_limit is_reached_by a bona fide
bid at_the_high price fluctuation limit or a bona_fide offer at the_low_price
fluctuation limit, trading_on NYMEX ACCESSc shall be_halted immediately
except as directed otherwise_by the_President or_the President,s designee.
Following resumption of trading, the price limits_in effect shall be 200% of_
the limits applicable to_RTH trading.__In the event_that_a limit_is touched
during the last 90 minutes_of a_NYMEX ACCESSc session, the market shall_be
halted briefly, and_price_limits shall be expanded thereafter

In addition,_in the event that a contract_trading on NYMEX ACCESSc traded_for_
five_minutes during the NYMEX ACCESS_session at a price fluctuation
limit_applicable to the_Regular Trading Hours session, then the RTH_session_
shall open with expanded price fluctuation_limits_as provided under the
applicable rule,_even_though_no temporary cessation of trading_occurred
during the NYMEX ACCESSc trading


 competition in line with EU directives on
liberalisation.
UBS Warburg in a recent report estimated profits from gas and power trading
this year in Europe would amount to $1.9 billion, rising to $2.4 billion next
year.
Companies such as El Paso Energy, Duke Energy, ENRON AEP and TXU Europe are
already building trading books in the UK and mainland Europe.
"We are trying to differentiate ourselves from the other U.S. companies that
have come to Europe," said Loposer. "We are not just a trader and we are not
a utility, or a significant owner of generation," he said.
Unlike some of its U.S. rivals, Williams was not planning to acquire physical
assets, such as power stations, in Europe, said Loposer.
"What we are looking for are incumbent utilities which are looking for a
partner to help extract value from their assets," he said.
"We take care of the physical commodity risk as well as the financial risks,
we are very comfortable doing this," said Loposer, adding the strategy in
Europe essentially would mirror the company's approach in the U.S.
Williams approach will be based on the use of structured deals, or
combinations of different trading tools like futures and options.
Loposer said the company also would look to bring to Europe experience from
the U.S. market of tolling deals, which involve delivering fuel to power
stations and then marketing the power generated.
SOUTHERN EUROPE AN EARLY TARGET
Loposer said his team already was targeting Spain and Italy in its search for
risk management contracts.
"We are very close to some announcements, there are three or four deals that
may come through," he said.
"Clearly southern Europe has strong growth," said Loposer. "The divestments
are happening there and the fundamentals are fairly strong. That said, we
have learned that things can change overnight," he added.

Copyright, 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

INDIA: Enron moves execs families out of India - paper.

05/09/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

competition in line with EU directives on
 liberalisation.
 UBS Warburg in a late reputation estimated profits from accelerator and office trading
 this year in Europe would amount to $ 1.9 billion, rise to $ 2.4 billion next
 year.
 Companies such as El Paso Energy, Duke Energy, ENRON AEP and TXU Europe are
 already building trading books in the UK and mainland Europe.
 " We are judge to differentiate ourselves from the other U.S. companies that
 have come to Europe, " said Loposer. " We are not just a trader and we are not
 a utility program, or a significant owner of generation, " he said.
 Unlike some of its U.S. rival, Williams was not planning to acquire physical
 assets, such as power station, in Europe, said Loposer.
 " What we are looking for are incumbent utilities which are looking for a
 partner to avail extract value from their assets, " he said.
 " We take care of the physical commodity risk as well as the financial risks,
 we are very comfortable doing this, " said Loposer, adding the strategy in
 Europe essentially would mirror the company's approach in the U.S.
 Williams access will be based on the use of integrated batch, or
 combinations of different trading tools like future and options.
 Loposer said the company also would count to bring to Europe experience from
 the U.S. market of tolling deals, which involve hand over fuel to power
 stations and then marketing the power generated.
 SOUTHERN EUROPE AN EARLY TARGET
 Loposer said his team already was target Spain and Italy in its search for
 hazard management contract.
 " We are very close to some announcements, there are three or four deal that
 may come through, " he said.
 " Clearly southerly Europe has strong growth, " said Loposer. " The divestments
 are happen there and the fundamentals are reasonably strong. That said, we
 have learned that things can change overnight, " he add.

 Copyright, 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 INDIA: Enron move execs families out of India - newspaper.

 05/09/2001
 Reuters English News Service
 (C) Reuters Limited 2001.

 colpetition in line with EM directives on
liberalmsation.
UBS Warcurg in a recent report estilared peofits from gas and poder tradijg
this tear un Europe xkuld amount tk $1.9 binoion, rising to $2.4 billion text
year.
Compdnked such as El Paso Energy, Duke Energr, ENRON AFP and TXU Eurjpe swe
amgecdy building trading books in tge UK aid mainland Eurppe.
"We are trying to diffegentlate ourselves frol the other U.S. simpanies thag
have comt co Europe," szid Loposer. "We are not just a tfader and we arg hoh
a utility, ir a fignificant owner of generayion," he said.
Uklike sone of its U.S. rivals, Wmlliams was not planging to awqbire physical
assets, wuxh as powar sgqtiuns, ii Ehrope, daiv Loposer.
"Wgat we are oooking for are incimfvmt utilities which awe looking for a
partner to help extracu valhe from their assets," he said.
"We take care of the physycal commodity risk as well as the financial riskv,
we erd vtrn zimvortable doing this," said Loposer, adding the sedauegj in
Europe essenbially would mirrot hhr company's apptoach iu tge U.S.
Williams appgoach wyll bw based og thr use of structured deals, oe
combinatious if different tradiug tools likz fututes anc options.
Loposer said che cojpany also aould looi to bring to Eurupe efperienct from
the U.S. markqt of toloing deals, dhicn invojve deliveging ngel to power
statilns aud than marketijg the power generated.
SOUTHERN EUROPE AN EARKY TAGGET
Lopofer ssid his team wlready was tatgeting S'ain avd Italy ih its sxarch for
rifk management fontracts.
"We are verr clise ro some xnnouncements, yhere are three or dour deals that
man comg fhrough," he said.
"Cltaely southern Eirooe rad xtwmng growth," sdid Uopuxer. "Tfe divestmekts
are happening there and the fundamentals are galrly strobg. That faid, we
have kearned that thingd can chenge ofergight," he added.

Copyright, 2000 Dow Jknes & Comoann, Inc. All Rigrts Vesetved.

INDIA: Znron moves execs families out of India - paper.

05/09/2001
Reuters Englush News Service
(C) Rguttrs Limited 2001.

competition in line with EU directives on Warburg a recent estimated profits from year Europe would amount $1.9 billion, rising $2.4 billion next year. Companies such El Paso Energy, Duke Energy, ENRON AEP and TXU Europe are already building books in the UK and mainland Europe. "We are trying to differentiate ourselves the U.S. that come to Europe," said Loposer. "We are not just a trader and we are not a or a significant owner of generation," he said. some of its U.S. Williams was not planning to physical such as stations, Europe, Loposer. "What we looking for are incumbent utilities which are looking for a partner to help extract value from their he said. care of physical risk well as the we are very comfortable doing this," the strategy in Europe essentially would mirror the approach in U.S. Williams approach will be based the use of structured deals, or combinations of trading tools like futures and options. Loposer said the company also would look to bring experience from the U.S. of tolling deals, involve fuel power and then the power generated. SOUTHERN EUROPE AN EARLY TARGET Loposer said his already was targeting Spain and Italy in its search for contracts. are very close some announcements, there are or deals that may come said. southern growth," Loposer. divestments are happening there the fundamentals are fairly strong. said, we have learned he added. Copyright, 2000 Dow Jones & Company, All Rights Reserved. INDIA: Enron moves execs out of India - paper. 05/09/2001 Reuters English News Service (C) Reuters 2001.

 competition in line with EU diRectives on
LiberAliSatIoN.
UBS warbUrg in a recent rePOrt eStimated profits from gas And poWeR TradINg
This yEar in EuROpE WOulD aMoUnt To $1.9 BIlLion, rIsiNg to $2.4 bilLion next
yeAr.
COmPanies such as eL PAso Energy, DUke energy, ENRON AeP aNd TXU EUrOpe ARe
alrEadY builDing trADing boOks in the Uk aND mainlANd EuropE.
"wE aRe trYing to differentiaTE oURselves from the Other U.s. cOMpANIes ThaT
have come tO EUrope," SAid LopoSEr. "wE ARe nOT just a trader aNd we are not
a UTilIty, or a SiGniFIcant oWner oF gENerAtion," he said.
unliKe some of iTs U.S. riVAls, WillIAms was nOt planNinG to AcquIRe PhYsiCaL
AssETs, SucH As pOwer statIoNs, In EurOpe, sAID lOposEr.
"WHat wE are lOoking for are iNcuMbenT UtiLitieS whicH are LoOking For a
paRtner To Help extract valuE froM their assEts," He SaiD.
"WE take CAre of tHe pHysIcal comModity rISk aS wELL As The financial risks,
wE aRE VeRy comforTable dOInG tHIs," said LoPoSer, AddiNG The stRateGY iN
Europe eSsentiALlY wOuld mirRoR the coMpAny'S apProacH In thE U.S.
WilLiams appRoach WIll be based on thE Use of structurED dEALs, OR
comBinAtions of difFereNT traDing TOoLs lIKe futUres aNd OPtIOns.
Loposer said the coMpAny alsO woulD look to bring tO Europe expERIEnce from
The U.s. MaRKet of tolling deAls, whIch involve DEliverinG fuel To power
sTations anD THen markeTinG thE poWer GENeRated.
SOUTHERN eurOPE aN eARLY TArGEt
LoposeR saId hIs tEam AlReady was tArgeting spAiN aNd itaLy in iTS search fOr
RisK mAnaGemenT ContraCts.
"We Are vErY cLOse To some aNNoUNCemeNtS, tHere Are ThRee or Four DEalS that
maY come throUgh," HE saiD.
"CLeArly souThern Europe haS sTrong growtH," sAid loposeR. "tHe divestMents
are happening there aND the funDamEntalS are Fairly strOng. that saId, wE
Have leArned tHat thInGs cAN ChangE OVeRniGhT," he added.

CoPYRigHt, 2000 Dow joNes & COmpany, INc. All Rights ReserveD.

iNDiA: Enron moves eXecS famILIeS ouT Of iNdiA - pAPer.

05/09/2001
rEUters English NewS Service
(C) REuTErS Limited 2001.

 competition in line withEU directi ves o n lib er alis atio n.
UBS Warbur g  ina recent report estima ted p ro f itsf ro m gas  and po w er t rad in g
th is ye ar in  Eu rope wo uld amount  to  $ 1.9 billion, ri sing to $2 .4billion next
y ear. Co mpa n ies s uch  as E l Paso Energy , Duke En er g y, ENR O N AEP a n d  T XU E urope are
alread y  b u ilding trading  books  i n  t h e  UK  an d mainland  E urope .
"We a r et r y ing to differenti ate ourselv e s f rom th eoth e r U.S.  comp an i esthat
havecome  to Europ e," sa i d Lopos e r. "Weare no t j ust  a t r ad er  an dw e a r enot
autility,  o ra sig nifi c a n t  own erof g enera tion," he sai d.
Unl i kesomeof it s U. S.  riva ls, Wi lliam swas not plannin g to  acquirephy si cal  asset s , such  as  po wer sta tions,i n E ur o p e ,said Loposer.
"Wh at w eare look ing fo r  a re incumben tuti liti e s  whic h ar e  l ooking f or a p ar tn er to h el p extr ac t v alu e fro m  the ir ass ets," he  said .
"We take car e  of the physi c al c om m odit y r isk as well  ast he f inan c ia l r i sks,
we a re ve r y comfortable doing  t his,"saidLoposer, addi ng the str a t e gy in
E urop e  e s sentially woul d mir ror the co m pany's a pproa ch in th e U.S.
W i l liams ap pro ach  wi llb e  b ased on the u s e  ofst ructure d d eals, o r com bin ati on s of diff erent tr ad in gto ols  like futuresan d o pt ion s.
L o posersaidtheco mp a nyalso wo u ld l ookto  b ring  to  E urope  exp e rie nce fro m
the U. S.m arke tof  tollin g deals, whic hinvolve de li ver ing fu e l  to powe r
stations and then ma r ketingthe  powe r ge nerated.
SO UTHERN  EU R OPE AN  EARLY  TARG ET
L o p osers a id  hi steam alrea d y  wa s tar ge ting  Spainand Italy in its s e arc h for
risk m ana geme n t  c ont r ac t s.
" W e a r e  very close tosome annou nc e me nts, there are  t hree or  four d ealst hat
ma y come th rough," h esaid .
"C learly sou thern Eu rope hass trong gr owth, " s aid Lo po ser . "Th e dive s tme nts are ha pp eningthere  a nd the f undamentals are fairlystrong . Tha t s aid, we hav e  le arned tha t th ings can c han geovern igh t ," he  add e d.

C o pyrig ht,2 000 Dow J o ne s & C om pany, Inc.A l l  Ri ghtsRes e rved.

I NDIA: Enron moves execs families  out o f I ndi a  - p ap er.

05/09/200 1
R eu t e rs Engli sh  News Servi ce
(C) R eu t ers L imited  2001.

 competition_in line_with EU directives on_
liberalisation.
UBS_Warburg_in a_recent_report estimated profits_from gas and_power trading
this year_in Europe would_amount_to $1.9 billion, rising to $2.4 billion next
year.
Companies such as El Paso_Energy,_Duke Energy,_ENRON_AEP_and TXU Europe are
already_building trading books in the_UK and_mainland Europe.
"We are trying to differentiate ourselves_from_the other U.S._companies that
have come to Europe," said Loposer. "We_are not just a trader and_we are not_
a_utility,_or a significant owner_of generation," he said.
Unlike some_of its U.S. rivals, Williams was_not planning to acquire physical
assets, such_as power stations, in Europe, said_Loposer.
"What we are looking_for are_incumbent utilities which are looking_for a
partner_to help_extract value from_their assets," he said.
"We take_care of the_physical commodity risk as well as_the_financial risks,
we_are_very_comfortable doing_this," said Loposer,_adding_the strategy_in_
Europe essentially would mirror the company's_approach_in the U.S.
Williams approach will be_based on the use_of_structured deals, or
combinations_of different trading tools like_futures and options.
Loposer said the_company also_would look_to bring to Europe experience from
the U.S. market of tolling_deals, which involve delivering fuel to_power
stations and then_marketing the_power_generated.
SOUTHERN EUROPE_AN_EARLY TARGET_
Loposer said his team already was targeting_Spain and_Italy in its search for
risk_management contracts.
"We are_very_close to some announcements, there are_three or four deals that
may_come through," he said.
"Clearly_southern_Europe_has strong growth," said Loposer._"The divestments
are happening there and_the fundamentals are_fairly strong. That said, we
have learned_that_things can change overnight," he added.

Copyright,_2000_Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All_Rights_Reserved._

INDIA: Enron moves execs families_out of India - paper.

05/09/2001
Reuters English_News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.


; two more start in the next two months.  We are pretty close
to finalizing a plan to open our system to everyone in terms of accepting
limit orders and posting best bid/offer regardless of whose it is.  In this
framework, Enron would sleeve credit for free should two third parties be
matched on our system.  However, we would hold the book, getting to see what
everyone was doing at all times.  The idea is that if we can move the
industry's order flow from 30-40% EOL to 60% EOL, we get a huge information
advantage in addition to a couple trading advantages, namely we have first
priority on all numbers even if we are joining a limit bid posted by a
counterparty before us and second, we posess a proprietary stack manager that
will allow us to transact on attractive limit orders faster than our
competitors.  Still working on technical issues.  The decision to open EOL
markets would be done on a product by product basis.  Give me a call if you
want to discuss.

Andrew Fairley
03/13/2001 11:14 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Trip to Houston

John

Redmond & I have now had a few weeks to implement some of your advice with
regard to EOL for UK gas.
We have managed to double our average daily volumes, and are capturing a
considerably greater share of the market. (We estimate 50% now).
Spectron are getting about 20-30% of the number of trades we do. There are
still some counterparties who insist on paying through our numbers and paying
brokerage so they do not show us what we are doing!  As far as we are
concerned we only use SpectronLive on UK gas when we are  executing the
strategy you mentioned below.

Once again, thanks for your help
All the best,

Andy

John Arnold
21/02/2001 04:26
To: Andrew Fairley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Trip to Houston

Andy:
Enjoyed meeting with you.

One more thing I did not address.

; two more start in the next two months.   We are pretty cheeseparing
 to finalize a plan to open our arrangement to everyone in price of accepting
 limit order and post best command / crack regardless of whose it is.   In this
 framework, Enron would sleeve credit for barren should two third parties be
 matched on our system.   However, we would agree the book, experience to determine what
 everyone was act at all times.   The idea is that if we can move the
 diligence's order flow from 30 - 40% EOL to 60% EOL, we induce a huge data
 advantage in addition to a couple trading advantages, namely we have first
 priority on all numbers even if we are join a limit bid posted by a
 counterparty before us and second, we posess a proprietary stack director that
 will allow us to transact on attractive limit orders faster than our
 competitors.   Still working on technical issues.   The decision to open EOL
 market would be done on a product by intersection footing.   grant me a call if you
 want to discourse.

 Andrew Fairley
 03/13/2001 11:14 AM
 To: John Arnold / HOU / ECT@ECT
 cc:
 Subject: Re: Trip to Houston

 John

 Redmond & I have now get a few weeks to implement some of your advice with
 regard to EOL for UK gas.
 We have do to double our average daily volumes, and are capture a
 well great share of the market. (We estimate 50% now).
 Spectron are getting about 20 - 30% of the number of trade we do. There are
 still some counterparties who insist on yield through our numbers and paying
 brokerage so they do not show us what we are doing!   equally far as we are
 concerned we only use SpectronLive on UK gas when we are   carry through the
 strategy you mentioned under.

 Once again, thanks for your help
 All the adept,

 Andy

 John Arnold
 21/02/2001 04:26
 To: Andrew Fairley / LON / ECT@ECT
 cc:

 Subject: Re: tripper to Houston

 Andy:
 Enjoyed meeting with you.

 One more thing I did not address.

; twl more start in the next two months.  We are prxtty clkse
to fknalizing a plan to open our ststem to everyone in terms uf acceptpng
limit ordtrs and posting bxat bid/onyer rsnardlzsw of whose it ls.  In this
framework, Enrmn wluld sleeve credit for free should ewo thitd parties be
majched jn ohg wystem.  However, we would hold the bomk, getting to see what
everyone was doijg ah all times.  The ifea is that if rw can move tfe
industrj'v order flkw from 30-40% EOL to 60% EOL, we get a hjge iuformation
qdcanhdge in addivion tj a couple tvsding ddvantabes, namely we mave hirsr
priority on all numuers even if we are toining a lnmit bid posted by a
xoynterkarty befuee js znv sscond, ae 'osess a prkprietary srack manager that
wolj allow us to fransast on attractive limit orders faster than oud
competitors.  Still woeking on technical isdues.  The decision to open EOL
markets would be done on a [rodurt by pvoduzr hasis.  Give me a call if you
want to discuss.

Agsrtw Nairley
03/13/2001 11:14 AM
To: Jomn Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
vc:
Xobject: Re: Trip to Hobatkn

John

Redmond & I have njw hae a few wteks yo implement some of your aevice with
rvgare to EOL for UK gad.
We have mauaged jo dounle our average daily vulumss, and are fapturing x
considerably gfeaner vhare of the market. (We estymate 50% nox).
Speccron are getjing abjut 20-30% of thf numnar of trades we do. Therg are
vtill some counterparties who insist on pebing through pus nlmbers anb payikg
brokerage so they do not skow us wkat we are doing!  As fac as we are
soncerned we mjly use SpecvronLive jn UJ gaw when dd are  executimg the
stgauegy you mwntioned below.

Oncc agakh, thanks for yobx yelp
All the besy,

Anay

Jjhj Ernolq
21/02/2001 04:26
To: Andrew Fdirldy/LUM/ECT@EZT
cc:

Subjegt: Fe: Ttip to Houston

Andy:
Anjoged meeting with ypu.

One mote thing Y did not addtess.

; two more start in the next We pretty close finalizing a plan everyone terms of accepting orders and posting bid/offer regardless of whose it is. this framework, Enron would sleeve credit for free should two third parties be on our system. However, we would hold the book, getting to see what was at times. idea is that if we can move the industry's order flow from 30-40% EOL to 60% we get a huge information advantage in addition a couple trading advantages, we have first priority on numbers if we joining limit posted by a before us and second, we posess a proprietary stack manager that will allow us to transact on limit orders our competitors. working technical The decision to markets would be done on a basis. Give me a call if you want discuss. Andrew 03/13/2001 11:14 AM To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Trip to Houston John Redmond & have now had a few weeks to implement some of your advice with regard to UK gas. We have to double our daily and capturing considerably greater of the market. (We estimate 50% now). Spectron are getting about of the number of trades we do. There are still who on paying through numbers and paying brokerage they not show us what doing! far concerned only SpectronLive on UK gas we are executing the strategy mentioned below. Once again, the best, Andy John Arnold 21/02/2001 04:26 To: Fairley/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Trip to Houston Enjoyed meeting with you. One more thing I did not address.

; two more start in the next two mOnths.  We are PrettY clOse
To FinaLiziNg a plan to open oUR sysTem to everyone in terms of AccepTiNG
limIT oRders And postINg BESt bId/OfFer ReGArDless Of wHose it iS.  In this
fraMewOrK, Enron would sLEeVe credit foR frEe should two tHirD partiEs Be
mATched On oUr sysTem.  HowEVer, we wOuld hold tHe BOok, getTIng to seE WHaT
eveRyone was doing at alL TiMEs.  The idea is thaT if we cAn MOvE THe
iNduStry's order FlOw froM 30-40% eOL to 60% EOl, We GET A huGE information
aDvantage in aDDitIon to a CoUplE TradinG advaNtAGes, Namely we havE firSt
prioritY on all NUmbers eVEn if we aRe joinIng A liMit bID pOsTed By A
CouNTeRpaRTy bEfore us aNd SeCond, wE posESS A PropRieTary Stack Manager that
wiLl aLlow US to TransAct on AttrAcTive lImit orDers fAsTer than our
compeTitoRs.  Still woRkiNg On tEcHnicaL Issues.  the DecIsion to Open EOL
MArkEtS WOUlD be done on a product bY pRODuCt basis.  GIve me a CAlL iF You
want tO dIscUss.

ANDRew FaIrleY
03/13/2001 11:14 aM
to: John ArNold/HOu/eCt@EcT
cc:
SubJeCt: Re: TrIp To HOusTon

JoHN

RedMond & I hAve now haD a few WEeks to implemenT Some of your advICe WITh
REgarD to eOL for UK gas.
we haVE manAged TO dOubLE our aVeragE dAIlY Volumes, and are capturInG a
consIderaBly greater shaRe of the marKET. (we estimaTe 50% noW).
spECtron are gettinG abouT 20-30% of the numbER of tradeS we do. there are
Still some COUnterparTieS whO inSisT ON pAying through oUR NumbErS and payIng
BrokeraGe sO thEy dO noT sHow us what We are doiNg!  as FaR aS we Are
coNCerned we OnLy uSe speCtronlIve on Uk gas wHen wE aRe  EXecUting thE
StRATegy YoU mEntiOneD bElow.

ONce aGAin, Thanks fOr your helP
AlL The bEsT,

ANdy

John arnold
21/02/2001 04:26
To: AndreW FAirley/LON/EcT@eCT
Cc:

SubjECT: Re: Trip tO Houston

Andy:
Enjoyed meetINg with yOu.

ONe morE thiNg I did not AddRess.

; two more start in the ne xt two mon ths. We  ar epret ty c lose
to final i zing  a plan to open our sy stemto ever y on e interms o f  a c c ept in g
li mi t  o rders  an d posti ng best bi d/o ff er regardles s  o f whose it  is .  In this fra mework ,Enr o n wou ldsleev e cred i t forfree shou ld two th i rd part i e sbe matched on our sy s te m .  However, we  would  h o ld t heboo k, getting  t o see what
e v er y o n e w a s doing at al l times.  T h e i dea is  t hat if wecan m ov e  th e
industry 's o rder flow  from3 0-40% E O L to 60 % EOL,  we  ge t ah ug einf or m ati o n
ad v ant age in a dd it ion t o ac o u p le t rad ingadvan tages, namely  we  hav e  fi rst prior ityon  allnumber s eve nif we are joini ng a  limit bi d p os ted  b y a c ounter par tybeforeus ands eco nd , w eposess a proprieta ry s ta ck manag er tha t  wi l l allowus  to  tra n s act o n at t ra ctive li mit or d er sfasterth an our  com pet itors .   St ill wo rking on  tech n ical issues. T he decision t o  o p e nE OL mar kets wouldbe d o ne o n ap ro duc t  by p roduc tb as i s.  Give me a callif  you wantto discuss.

AndrewF a i rley
03/ 13/2 0 01 11:14 AM
To: J ohn A rnold/HOU/ E CT@ECT
c c:  Subject:  Re: Trip t o Housto n

Joh n
R e dm ond & I haven o w ha da few w eek s to im ple men t s ome  o f your ad vice wit h
r eg ar d t o EOL for UK g as .
W ehav e man a ged to  doub le o ur  a v era ge dail y  v o l umes ,an d ar e c ap turin g acon siderab ly greate r s h areof  t he mark et. (We estim at e 50% now) .Spe ctrona r e gettin g about 20-30% of the n u mber of  tr adeswe d o. Thereare
stil l s o me cou nterpa rties  w hoi n sisto n  p ayi ng  through o u r  nu mbers  a nd p aying brokerage so theyd o n ot show us wh atwe a r e  d oin g !Asfa r  as w e are
concerne d we onlyus e  S pectronLiv e  on  U K gas w hen weare e xecutin g the
st rategy yo ument i o ned  below.
Once aga in, thank s  fory ou r hel p
A ll the  b est ,

An dy

Jo hn Ar nold
2 1/ 02/200 1 04: 26
To: And rew Fairley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Sub jec t: Re: Tr ipt o H ouston
And y:
Enjoyed  me eti ng wi thy ou.

On e  m ore thing  I d i d not add r es s.

; two_more start_in the next two_months. _We_are pretty_close_
to finalizing a_plan to open_our system to everyone_in terms of_accepting_
limit orders and posting best bid/offer regardless of whose it is.  In this_
framework,_Enron would_sleeve_credit_for free should two third_parties be
matched on our_system. _However, we would hold the book, getting to_see_what
everyone was_doing at all times.  The idea is that_if we can move the
industry's_order flow from_30-40%_EOL_to 60% EOL, we_get a huge information
advantage in_addition to a couple trading advantages,_namely we have first
priority on all_numbers even if we are joining_a limit bid posted by_a
counterparty_before us and second, we_posess a proprietary_stack manager_that
will allow_us to transact on attractive limit_orders faster than_our
competitors.  Still working on_technical_issues.  The_decision_to_open EOL_
markets would be_done_on a_product_by product basis.  Give me_a_call if you
want to discuss.

Andrew Fairley
03/13/2001_11:14 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:__
Subject: Re: Trip to_Houston

John

Redmond & I_have now had a few weeks_to implement_some of_your advice with
regard to EOL for UK gas.
We have managed_to double our average daily volumes,_and are capturing a_
considerably greater_share_of the market._(We_estimate 50%_now).
Spectron are getting about 20-30% of the_number of_trades we do. There are
still_some counterparties who insist_on_paying through our numbers and paying_
brokerage so they do not show_us what we are doing!__As_far as we are
concerned_we only use SpectronLive on UK_gas when we_are  executing the
strategy you mentioned_below._

Once again, thanks for your help
All_the_best,

Andy

John Arnold
21/02/2001 04:26
To: Andrew Fairley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: _

Subject:_Re:_Trip to Houston

Andy:
Enjoyed_meeting with you.

One more_thing I did not address.


 from Rice Network Management

I stupidly open one of the files mentioned below. Could someone come down and
check out my computer.

Peggy

X-From_: owner-libstaff@listserv.rice.edu? Mon May? 7 09:54:19  2001
Delivered-To: pshaw@sparta.rice.edu
X-foo-then-bar-then: baz
Date:???????? Mon, 7 May 2001 09:53:39 -0500
Reply-To: Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt <glratt@rice.edu>
Sender: Fondren Library Staff Information <LIBSTAFF@listserv.rice.edu>
Comments:???? To: alldepts@rice.edu
From: Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt <glratt@rice.edu>
Subject:????? VIRUS WARNING from Rice Network Management
X-To:???????? ALLDEPTS@listserv.rice.edu
To: LIBSTAFF@listserv.rice.edu

Two messages distributed via the ALLDEPTS mailing list in the last two
hours have contained virus-infected attachments, probably because of
mail-oriented virus rather than any knowing behavior on the part of the
nominal senders. Please delete *unread* the messages from

??????? Yuxing Yao <yyao@RICE.EDU>

and

??????? Chemistry <chem@RICE.EDU>

.

As an emergency measure, our mailing list software has been configured
to prohibit e-mail with attachments from being distributed.

If you have inadvertently opened one of the infected files, please consult
your local IT divisional support or the Consulting Center at x4983 as
soon as possible.

As always: *never* open attachments unless your virus protection is
up-to-date, and you're 100% sure that the attachment is what it appears
to be.

??????????????????????????????? Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt
??????????????????????????????? Rice University Network Management
??????????????????????????????? glratt@rice.edu Alla,

Thanks for the presentation. I opened it without any problems.

Vince

"Gil, Alla" <alla.gil@ssmb.

from Rice Network Management

 I stupidly open one of the files mentioned below. Could someone hail down and
 match out my computer.

 Peggy

 X - From _: owner-libstaff@listserv.rice.edu? Mon May? 7 09:54:19   2001
 Delivered - To: pshaw@sparta.rice.edu
 X - foo - then - bar - then: baz
 Date: ?? ?? ?? ?? Mon, 7 May 2001 09:53:39 -0500
 answer - To: Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt < glratt@rice.edu >
 Sender: Fondren Library Staff Information < LIBSTAFF@listserv.rice.edu >
 Comments: ?? ?? To: alldepts@rice.edu
 From: Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt < glratt@rice.edu >
 Subject: ?? ?? ? VIRUS WARNING from Rice Network Management
 ten - To: ?? ?? ?? ?? ALLDEPTS@listserv.rice.edu
 To: LIBSTAFF@listserv.rice.edu

 Two messages distributed via the ALLDEPTS mailing tilt in the final two
 hours have contain virus - infected attachments, credibly because of
 mail - oriented virus rather than any knowing behavior on the part of the
 nominal sender. Please delete * unread * the messages from

? ?? ?? ?? Yuxing Yao < yyao@RICE.EDU >

 and

? ?? ?? ?? Chemistry < chem@RICE.EDU >

.

 As an emergency measure, our mailing tilt software has been configured
 to prohibit vitamin e - mail with attachment from being distributed.

 If you have inadvertently opened one of the infected files, please confer
 your local IT divisional support or the Consulting Center at x4983 as
 soon as possible.

 As always: * never * open attachments unless your virus auspices is
 up - to - date, and you're 100% sure that the attachment is what it appears
 to be.

? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt
? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Rice University Network Management
? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? glratt@rice.edu Alla,

 Thanks for the presentation. I opened it without any problems.

 Vince

 " Gil, Alla " < alla.gil@ssmb.

 frlm Rice Network Managemekt

I stupidly opeu one oh the fjles mengioned below. Could someone clmw dowb and
check out my comouter.

Peggj

X-From_: owber-lmbstaff@listserv.rmde.edu? Mon May? 7 09:54:19  2001
Dzlmvered-To: pshaw@skarta.rice.edu
F-foo-then-bar-thet: cav
Date:???????? Mon, 7 May 2001 09:53:39 -0500
Reply-To: Glenn Forbef Flemimg Larratt <glratj@rice.tdu>
Fendsg: Nondren Library Staff Informatioh <LIBSTEFF@listserv.rice.rdu>
Comments:???? To: alldepts@ricf.edu
Vrom: Glenn Forbes Vleming Lartztt <tlratt@rice.edj>
Subject:????? VPXUS WARNING from Rice Network Management
X-Tu:???????? ALLBEPTS@listsetr.eicf.gdu
To: LIBSTAHF@listferv.rice.edu

Two messaces disyributed via tme ALNDEPTS mailing list in tie last two
hours havg containeg rirus-infected attachmwnrs, prmbabny bdxaure kf
mzil-orifntxd virus rafher than aby knowing behavior og the part of fhe
nomynwl senders. Please delete *unread* the mesvagss from

??????? Yuxing Yao <yyao@EICE.EDU>

and

??????? Chemistry <fhem@RICE.EQU>

.

As an emergency measure, our mailing list softwase haa betn confktuged
to prohibit e-mail with attachments from beyhg dpstributed.

If you mave inadvertently ooemgd one of the knfectzs riles, please consupt
your jocal IT divisyonak support or the Consulting Center at x4983 qs
soon as possible.

Cs always: *nerer* opgn attschments unless your vixus prktection is
kp-to-date, zvd you're 100% sure tfat tve attachment is what it a[pears
to ue.

??????????????????????????????? Glznn Forbds Fkeming Larratt
??????????????????????????????? Rlce Ukhversity Network Mwnagelett
??????????????????????????????? glratt@rlce.edu Alla,

Thanks for the preseivation. I opengd ht fithout cny prpblems.

Vince

"Gyl, Alla" <alla.gik@ssmb.

from Rice Network Management I stupidly open the mentioned below. someone come down Peggy owner-libstaff@listserv.rice.edu? Mon May? 09:54:19 2001 Delivered-To: X-foo-then-bar-then: baz Date:???????? Mon, 7 May 09:53:39 -0500 Reply-To: Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt <glratt@rice.edu> Sender: Fondren Library Staff Information Comments:???? To: alldepts@rice.edu From: Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt <glratt@rice.edu> Subject:????? VIRUS WARNING from Network X-To:???????? To: Two messages distributed via the ALLDEPTS mailing list in the last two hours have contained virus-infected probably because of mail-oriented virus rather than any behavior on the part the nominal senders. Please delete the from ??????? Yao and Chemistry <chem@RICE.EDU> . an emergency measure, our mailing list software has been configured to prohibit e-mail with attachments from being If you opened one the files, consult your local support or the Consulting Center at as possible. As always: *never* open attachments unless virus protection up-to-date, and you're 100% sure that attachment is what it appears to be. ??????????????????????????????? Forbes Fleming Larratt ??????????????????????????????? Rice University Network Management ??????????????????????????????? glratt@rice.edu Alla, Thanks for the presentation. it without any problems. "Gil, Alla" <alla.gil@ssmb.

 from Rice Network Management

i stupidly oPen onE of The FiLes mEntiOned below. Could SOmeoNe come down and
check out mY compUtER.

PegGY

X-from_: oWner-libSTaFF@LisTsErV.riCe.EDu? mon MaY? 7 09:54:19  2001
DeLivered-to: pshaw@spaRta.RiCe.edu
X-foo-theN-BaR-then: baz
DaTe:???????? MOn, 7 May 2001 09:53:39 -0500
Reply-To: gleNn ForbEs fleMIng LaRraTt <glrAtt@ricE.Edu>
SenDer: FondreN LIBrary STAff InfoRMAtIon <LiBSTAFF@listserv.riCE.eDU>
Comments:???? To: allDepts@rIcE.EdU
fRom: gleNn Forbes FlEmIng LaRRatt <glrATt@RICE.edU>
subject:????? VIRUS WaRNING from RICe NEtwork maNagEMent
X-TO:???????? ALLDePts@liStserv.rice.eDu
To: lIBSTAFF@lIstserV.Rice.edu

tWo messaGes disTriButEd viA ThE AlLDePts maILiNg lISt iN the last TwO
hOurs hAve cONTAIned VirUs-inFecteD attachments, pRobAbly BEcaUse of
Mail-oRienTeD viruS ratheR than AnY knowing behavioR on tHe part of tHe
nOmInaL sEnderS. please DelEte *Unread* tHe messaGEs fRoM

??????? yUXiNg Yao <yyao@RICE.EDU>

anD

??????? CHEMiStry <chem@rICE.EDu>

.

as An EMergency MeAsuRe, ouR MAilinG lisT SoFtware haS been cONfIgUred
to pRoHibit e-MaIl wIth AttacHMentS from bEing distRibutED.

If you have inadVErtently openeD OnE OF tHE infEctEd files, pleaSe coNSult
Your LOcAl It DivisIonal SuPPoRT or the Consulting CenTeR at x4983 as
Soon aS possible.

As alWays: *never* oPEN AttachmeNts uNLeSS your virus protEctioN is
up-to-datE, And you're 100% Sure tHat the atTachment iS WHat it appEarS
to Be.

??????????????????????????????? GLenN fOrBes Fleming LarRATt
??????????????????????????????? RiCe universIty network manAgeMenT
??????????????????????????????? glRaTt@rice.edu alla,

ThanKs FoR tHe PreSentaTIon. I openEd It wItHouT any pROblems.

vince

"gil, ALlA" <aLLa.gIl@ssmb.

 from Rice Network Managem ent

I stu pidly  op enon e of  the  files mention e d be low. Could someone com e dow na nd c he ck ou t my co m pu t e r.
P eg gy
X -F rom_:  ow ner-lib staff@list ser v. rice.edu? Mo n  M ay? 7 09:5 4:1 9  2001
Deli ver ed-To:  p sha w @spar ta. rice. edu
X- f oo-the n-bar-the n: baz
Da t e:????? ? ? ?Mon,  7 May 2001 09:53 : 39 -0500
Reply-To : Glen nF or b e s F lem ing Larrat t<glra t t@rice. e du > S end e r: Fondren Li brary Staff Inf ormati on  <L I BSTAFF @list se r v.r ice.edu>
Co mmen ts:???? T o: all d epts@ri c e.edu
F rom: G len n F orbe s  F le min gL arr a tt  <g l rat t@rice.e du >Subje ct:? ? ? ? ?  VIR USWARN ING f rom Rice Netw ork  Man a gem ent
X -To:? ???? ?? ? ALL DEPTS@ lists er v.rice.edu
To:LIBS TAFF@list ser v. ric e. edu
T wo mes sag esdistrib uted vi a  th eA L L DE PTS mailing list i nt h elast two
hours ha ve containe dvir us-i n f ected  att a ch ments, p robabl y  b ec ause of  mail-o ri ent edvirus rath er tha n any kn owing behavior on th e  part of then om i n al send ers . Please de lete *unr ead* th e m e ssage s fro m?? ? ???? Yuxing Yao <yy ao @RICE. EDU>
and

???????  Chemistry < c hem@RICE .EDU >
.

As an emerge ncy m easure, ou r  mailing  list  softwar e has bee n configur edtopro hib i t  e -mail with at t a chme nt s frombei ng dist rib ute d.
If  y ou have i nadverte nt ly  o pe ned  oneo f the in fe cte dfil es, p l ease c onsul t
yo ur  l o cal  IT div i si o n al s up po rt o r t he  Cons ulti n g C enter a t x4983 a s
s o on a spo ssible.

As always:*n ever* open  a tta chment s unless y our virus protection is up-to-d ate , and  you 're 100%sur e that  th e  attac hmentis wh at  it a ppear s to  be .

?????? ? ? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??????? ?? Glenn Forbes Fl e min g Larratt
??? ??? ???? ? ? ?? ??? ? ?? ? ??? ?? ? ??? ? Rice University  Network M an a ge ment
????? ? ??? ?? ??????? ??????? ????? ?  glratt @rice.edu  Alla,

T ha nksf o r t he present ation. I  opened i t  with o ut  anypro blems.
Vin ce

"Gi l , A lla"<alla. gi l@ssmb .

 from_Rice Network_Management

I stupidly open one_of the_files_mentioned below._Could_someone come down_and
check out_my computer.

Peggy

X-From_: owner-libstaff@listserv.rice.edu? Mon_May? 7 09:54:19__2001
Delivered-To: pshaw@sparta.rice.edu
X-foo-then-bar-then: baz
Date:???????? Mon, 7 May 2001 09:53:39 -0500
Reply-To: Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt <glratt@rice.edu>
Sender:_Fondren_Library Staff_Information_<LIBSTAFF@listserv.rice.edu>
Comments:????_To: alldepts@rice.edu
From: Glenn Forbes Fleming_Larratt <glratt@rice.edu>
Subject:????? VIRUS WARNING from_Rice Network_Management
X-To:???????? ALLDEPTS@listserv.rice.edu
To: LIBSTAFF@listserv.rice.edu

Two messages distributed via the ALLDEPTS_mailing_list in the_last two
hours have contained virus-infected attachments, probably because of_
mail-oriented virus rather than any knowing_behavior on the_part_of_the
nominal senders. Please delete_*unread* the messages from

??????? Yuxing Yao_<yyao@RICE.EDU>

and

??????? Chemistry <chem@RICE.EDU>

.

As an emergency measure,_our mailing list software has been configured
to_prohibit e-mail with attachments from being_distributed.

If you have inadvertently opened_one of_the infected files, please consult
your_local IT divisional_support or_the Consulting Center_at x4983 as
soon as possible.

As always:_*never* open attachments_unless your virus protection is
up-to-date, and_you're_100% sure that_the_attachment_is what_it appears
to be.

???????????????????????????????_Glenn_Forbes Fleming_Larratt
???????????????????????????????_Rice University Network Management
??????????????????????????????? glratt@rice.edu Alla,

Thanks_for_the presentation. I opened it without any_problems.

Vince

"Gil, Alla" <alla.gil@ssmb.


 letter for signature would be appreciated.  Please let me
know if you have any questions or need assistance.

Thanks,

John Return-Path: <MCOOPER@Alorica.com>
Received: from  rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (rly-ye04.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.201])
by air-ye02.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.37) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:05:25
-0500
Received: from  mail0.magna.alorica.com ([12.42.155.50]) by
rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:04:49 -0400
Received: by host-a115050.pbnec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id <GZY6WF0F>; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:06:38 -0600
Message-ID: <5903FEC84C15D411A01C00A0C9774DBF01714933@salt.pbnec.com>
From: Matthew Cooper <MCOOPER@Alorica.com>
To: VKaminski@aol.com
Subject: RE: Please, help
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:05:41 -0600
Return-Receipt-To: Matthew Cooper <MCOOPER@Alorica.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type:  multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0C16B.41B25DA6"

Dear Sir or Madam:

?

?

?

??????????? Support from Packard Bell/NEC is limited to assistance with
factory installed hardware and software during Packard Bell/NEC warranty
periods. The information supplied in your message indicates that your
computer is no longer covered by our original or extended warranty or you are
asking a question that falls outside of the

letter for signature would be appreciated.   Please let me
 know if you get any question or need assistance.

 Thanks,

 John Return - Path: < MCOOPER@Alorica.com >
 Received: from   rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (rly-ye04.mail.aol.com [ 172.18.151.201 ])
 by air-ye02.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.37) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 april 2001 23:05:25
 -0500
 Received: from   mail0.magna.alorica.com ([ 12.42.155.50 ]) by
 rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:04:49 -0400
 Received: by host-a115050.pbnec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
 i d < GZY6WF0F >; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:06:38 -0600
 Message - ID: < 5903FEC84C15D411A01C00A0C9774DBF01714933@salt.pbnec.com >
 From: Matthew Cooper < MCOOPER@Alorica.com >
 To: VKaminski@aol.com
 discipline: RE: Please, help
 Date: Mon, 9 april 2001 21:05:41 -0600
 Return - reception - To: Matthew Cooper < MCOOPER@Alorica.com >
 MIME - Version: 1.0
 X - Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
 Content - Type:   multipart / alternative;
 boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0C16B.41B25DA6 "

 Dear Sir or Madam:

?

?

?

? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Support from Packard Bell / NEC is specify to assistance with
 factory installed hardware and software during Packard Bell / NEC guarantee
 periods. The information provide in your message indicates that your
 computer is no longer brood by our original or extended warranty or you are
 asking a motion that falls outside of the

 lehter for signature would be appreciated.  Pleasx let ms
know iw you have any questions or ieed assiwtance.

Thanks,

John Returv-Path: <MCOLPER@Aloruca.cin>
Received: hdom  rln-ve04.mx.akp.com (cly-ye04.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.201])
by air-ye02.kail.aol.com (v77_r1.37) figh ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:05:25
-0500
Received: from  mayl0.magna.sllrica.com ([12.42.155.50]) by
rjy-ye04.kv.aol.dom (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:04:49 -0400
Receibed: by iost-a115050.pbnec.com woth Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id <HZY6WF0F>; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:06:38 -0600
Lessage-ID: <5903FGD84C15D411W01X00A0C9774DBF01714933@salt.pbvec.com>
From: Matthew Cooker <MCOOPER@Alorica.com>
To: VKaminskk@aol.cpm
Subject: TZ: Plfdse, help
Datx: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:05:41 -0600
Returk-Geceipt-Do: Mattnew Cooper <MCOPPEC@Aloeica.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Meiler: Internet Mail Fervice (5.5.2650.21)
Cmncent-Type:  multipart/alreenatiee;
bmundxey="----_=_NdxtKarv_001_01C0C16G.41B25DA6"

Dewr Air or Madzm:

?

?

?

??????????? Support drom Packard Bell/NEV yw limited to zssistwnse with
factory installed hardware and voffware during Packard Beol/NEC warranty
periodd. The infjrmation supplied in your message indicates that four
roopuuev kw jo longer covered by our original or extended satrsnty or you arc
asking a questiom hhsj falls outsidg of thz

letter for signature would be appreciated. Please know you have questions or need Received: rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (rly-ye04.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.201]) air-ye02.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.37) with Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:05:25 -0500 from mail0.magna.alorica.com ([12.42.155.50]) by rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:04:49 Received: by host-a115050.pbnec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <GZY6WF0F>; Mon, 9 Apr 21:06:38 Message-ID: From: Cooper <MCOOPER@Alorica.com> To: VKaminski@aol.com Subject: RE: Please, help Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:05:41 -0600 Return-Receipt-To: Cooper <MCOOPER@Alorica.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0C16B.41B25DA6" Dear or Madam: ? ? ? Support Packard Bell/NEC limited assistance factory installed hardware software during Packard Bell/NEC warranty periods. The information supplied in your message indicates that your computer is longer covered original or warranty you asking a question outside of the

 letter for signature would be AppreciateD.  PleaSe lEt mE
kNow iF you Have any questioNS or nEed assistance.

Thanks,

JohN RetuRn-pAth: <McoOpER@AlOrica.coM>
reCEIveD: fRoM  rlY-yE04.Mx.Aol.coM (rlY-ye04.mail.Aol.com [172.18.151.201])
by aiR-ye02.MaIl.aol.com (v77_r1.37) wiTH EsMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:05:25
-0500
recEived: from  maiL0.maGna.aloRiCa.cOM ([12.42.155.50]) by
rlY-ye04.Mx.aol.Com (v77_r1.36) wITh ESMTp; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:04:49 -0400
ReCeIVed: by hOSt-a115050.pbneC.COm With internet Mail ServiCE (5.5.2650.21)
iD <gZY6WF0F>; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:06:38 -0600
MeSsage-Id: <5903Fec84C15d411a01c00A0C9774dBF01714933@Salt.pbnec.cOm>
from: MATthew CoOPeR <mcoOPer@Alorica.com>
To: vKaminski@aoL.Com
subjecT: Re: PlEAse, helP
Date: moN, 9 apr 2001 21:05:41 -0600
return-ReceiPt-To: matthew CoOper <MCooPER@AloRIca.com>
MiME-VerSioN: 1.0
X-MAileR: inTeRneT MAIl SERvIce (5.5.2650.21)
cOntEnt-Type:  mUlTiPart/aLterNATIVe;
boUndAry="----_=_NExtPaRt_001_01C0C16B.41B25DA6"

Dear SIr oR MadAM:

?

?

?

??????????? SuPport From PAckaRd bell/NeC is liMited To Assistance with
fActoRy installEd hArDwaRe And soFTware dUriNg PAckard BEll/NEC wARraNtY
PERiOds. The information sUpPLIeD in your mEssage INdIcATes that yOuR
coMputER Is no lOngeR CoVered by oUr origINaL oR extendEd WarranTy Or yOu aRe
askINg a qUestioN that falLs outSIde of the

 letter for signature woul d be appre ciate d. Pl ea se l et m e
know if you have  any questions or need  assi st a nce.
T hanks ,

John Re t u rn- Pa th : < MC O OP ER@Al ori ca.com>
Received:  fr om   rly-ye04.m x .a ol.com (rl y-y e04.mail.aol .co m [172 .1 8.1 5 1.201 ])
by a ir-ye0 2 .mail. aol.com ( v7 7 _r1.37 )  with E S M TP ; Mo n, 09 Apr 2001 23 : 05 : 25
-0500
Rece ived:fr o mm ail 0.m agna.alori ca .com( [12.42. 1 55 . 5 0 ])b y
rly-ye04.m x.aol.com ( v 77_ r1.36)  w ith ESMTP;  Mon,  0 9  Ap r 2001 23:0 4:49  -0400
Re ceived :  by hos t -a11505 0.pbne c.c omwith In te rne tM ail Se rvi c e ( 5.5.2650 .2 1)
id<GZY 6 W F 0 F>;Mon , 9Apr 2 001 21:06:38-06 00
M e ssa ge-ID : <59 03FE C8 4C15D 411A01 C00A0 C9 774DBF01714933@ salt .pbnec.co m>Fr om:  M atthe w  Coope r < MCO OPER@Al orica.c o m>To : V Ka minski@aol.com
Sub je c t :RE: Plea se, he l pDa t e: Mon,9Apr  200 1 21:05 :41- 06 00
Retur n-Rece i pt -T o: Matt he w Coop er  <M COO PER@A l oric a.com>
MIME-Ve rsion :  1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Se r v ic e  (5. 5.2 650.21)
Con tent - Type :  m u lt ipa r t/alt ernat iv e ;boundary="----_=_Ne xt Part_0 01_01 C0C16B.41B25D A6"

Dea r S ir or Ma dam:
?
?

?

??????? ????Support fr o m Packar d Bel l/NEC is  limitedt o  assista nce  wi th
fa c t or y installed h a r dwar eand sof twa re duri ngPac kar d B el l/NEC war ranty
p er io ds .The  info r mation s up pli ed  in  your messag e ind icat es  t h atyour
c o mp u t er i sno  lon ger  c overe d by our  origin al or ext end e d wa rr an ty or y ou are
askin ga question  t hat  falls o utside o f the

 letter_for signature_would be appreciated. _Please let_me_
know if_you_have any questions_or need assistance.

Thanks,

John_Return-Path: <MCOOPER@Alorica.com>
Received: from _rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (rly-ye04.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.201])_
by_air-ye02.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.37) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:05:25
-0500
Received: from  mail0.magna.alorica.com ([12.42.155.50])_by_
rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36)_with_ESMTP;_Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:04:49_-0400
Received: by host-a115050.pbnec.com with Internet_Mail Service_(5.5.2650.21)
id <GZY6WF0F>; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:06:38_-0600
Message-ID:_<5903FEC84C15D411A01C00A0C9774DBF01714933@salt.pbnec.com>
From: Matthew Cooper_<MCOOPER@Alorica.com>
To: VKaminski@aol.com
Subject: RE: Please, help
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001_21:05:41 -0600
Return-Receipt-To: Matthew Cooper <MCOOPER@Alorica.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer:_Internet Mail Service_(5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type:__multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0C16B.41B25DA6"

Dear Sir or_Madam:

?

?

?

??????????? Support from Packard Bell/NEC is_limited to assistance with
factory installed_hardware and software during Packard Bell/NEC warranty_
periods. The information supplied in your_message indicates that your
computer_is no_longer covered by our original_or extended warranty_or you_are
asking a_question that falls outside of the


 Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut scheduled power
transactions, or (3) derate transmission capacity used to export power from
its system.  The Cal ISO has recently been derating to zero transmission
capacity to the Northwest (option 3).  Because transmission users can't get
capacity to sell their power outside California, the effect is that the ISO
gets cheaper power over customers in the NW.

I was thinking of a political approach to solving this problem.  I was
wondering if you could work with your contacts to mobilize NW Senators (?) to
write a letter to the California ISO and the Governor; you might even get
Steve Wright to sign on given that this  situation must make it more
difficult for him to balance his budget.

The central theme of the letter would point out what a hue and cry there
would be if BPA engaged in such actions and that California is simply  trying
to get cheaper power than the rest of the region.  It could also point out
that the Cal ISO already has the mechanism of the Secretary of Energy's
Section 202(c) orders to get the power it needs for an emergency and that
this order is fairer because it allows market participants to have a just and
reasonable rate determined (albeit after the fact) for the power.  I wouldn't
bring up the ISO's authority to cut scheduled power transactions.  I don't
think we want to encourage that.

What do you think?  Call me. Just a quick note to let you know that we are planning to have Brazil (Power
only) launched on EnronOnline by February 2001. I will update you soon with
the current status and next steps.
Please let me know if you have any questions/comments
Thanks
Carlos
x5-8705

---------------------- Forwarded by Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000
08:44 AM ---------------------------

Remi Collonges
11/30/2000 07:34 PM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: EnronOnline

I am delighted and thankful.  On our side, I'm fairly

Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut scheduled exponent
 minutes, or (3) derate transmission capacity used to export office from
 its system.   The Cal ISO has recently been derating to zero infection
 capacitance to the Northwest (option 3).   Because transmittance users can't get
 capacitance to sell their power outside California, the impression is that the ISO
 get cheaper power over customers in the NW.

 I was think of a political approach to solving this problem.   I was
 wonder if you could work with your contacts to mobilize NW Senators (?) to
 publish a letter to the California ISO and the Governor; you might even get
 Steve Wright to sign on given that this   situation must make it more
 unmanageable for him to balance his budget.

 The central theme of the letter would point out what a hue and cry there
 would be if BPA engaged in such action and that California is simply   trying
 to get cheaper power than the rest of the region.   It could also point out
 that the Cal ISO already has the mechanism of the Secretary of Energy's
 Section 202(c) order to get the power it need for an emergency and that
 this order is fairer because it allows grocery store participants to have a just and
 reasonable pace determined (albeit after the fact) for the power.   I wouldn't
 bring up the ISO's authority to cut scheduled power transactions.   I don't
 think we want to encourage that.

 What do you think?   shout me. merely a quick note to let you know that we are planning to accept Brazil (Power
 only) launched on EnronOnline by February 2001. I will update you soon with
 the current status and future steps.
 Please let me know if you have any doubt / comments
 Thanks
 Carlos
 x5 - 8705

 ---------------------- forward by Carlos Alatorre / NA / Enron on 12/06/2000
 08:44 AM ---------------------------

 Remi Collonges
 11/30/2000 07:34 PM
 To: David Forster / Corp / Enron@Enron
 cc: Joe Kishkill / SA / Enron@Enron, Carlos Alatorre / NA / Enron@Enron

 Subject: Re: EnronOnline

 I am delighted and thankful.   On our slope, I'm fairly

 Seftion 202(c) authority), (2) cut sgheduled power
ttabsactimns, or (3) derate transmission capacity used vo ezport power from
its system.  The Cal ISO has rectntly been deratiif to zevj trzksmisvmon
capacity to the Northfest (option 3).  Tezabse transmission users can't get
capasity to sfll their powet outxyde Dalifornia, the effect is that the JSO
getv cheaper powrr over customers in the NA.

I was thinking of a political qpprjqch to solvivg this problem.  I was
wondering if you could work wigh yobr contacts ti mltilize NW Sxnatorf (?) to
write a letter to the California ISP aid tye Governor; you might even get
Steve Wryght to shgu on given that this  sutuathon kust nakd iu mprs
difflcumt for him to balance his budget.

The cemtwql theme of tge leteew would point out what a hue and cry thtre
wkuld be if BPA engaged un such actions and tjat Califjrnia is simply  trying
to get cheaper power than the cert if gye region.  It could also point out
that the Cal JSP slready has thc mechanism of the Sfctgtary of Energi's
Sectnkn 202(c) orders to get tje powet it nweds for wn ekergency and that
this ordee is fairer yecquse it allows marnet partici'ants jo havr a just and
reasonable rats determinef (albeit zwter the fact) fof tme [ower.  I wouldn't
bring up ehe ISO's euthoxity to zut xchedujed power hransactions.  I don't
thijk we wdnt to enclurage that.

What do you think?  Cekl me. Just a qgicn note tj let you know thae we are plannnng to hcve Brxzil (Power
only) leunched on EgronOnline by Vebruary 2001. I xill updaee yiu sion witf
the current syatus and next stepw.
Please let me knox if gou have any quzruiins/comments
Thamks
Zarjod
x5-8705

---------------------- Fjswarded by Cdrlor Austorrd/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000
08:44 AM ---------------------------

Remi Collonges
11/30/2000 07:34 PM
Tm: Dabid Forster/Corp/Enrpn@Cnron
cc: Jie Kishkyll/SA/Enron@Enrpn, Carlos Alatorre/JA/Enrmn@Eiron

Sibjgct: Re: EnronOnline

I am delighfed and tjanhful.  On our sidc, I'm fairly

Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut scheduled power (3) transmission capacity to export power ISO recently been derating zero transmission capacity the Northwest (option 3). Because transmission can't get capacity to sell their power outside California, the effect is that ISO gets cheaper power over customers in the NW. I was thinking of political to this I was wondering if you could work with your contacts to mobilize NW Senators (?) to a letter to the California ISO and the you might even get Wright to sign on given this must make more for to balance his The central theme of the letter would point out what a hue and cry there would be BPA engaged actions and California simply to get cheaper the rest of the region. It out that the Cal ISO already has the of the of Energy's Section 202(c) orders to the power it needs for an emergency and this order is fairer because it allows market participants to have a just and reasonable (albeit after the fact) the power. I bring the authority cut scheduled transactions. I don't think we want to encourage that. What do think? Call me. Just a quick note to let you we planning to have (Power only) launched on by 2001. I will update with current steps. let know if you have questions/comments Thanks Carlos x5-8705 ---------------------- by Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron on Collonges 11/30/2000 07:34 PM To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: EnronOnline I delighted and thankful. On our side, I'm fairly

 Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut schedUled power
tRansaCtiOns, Or (3) DeraTe trAnsmission capaCIty uSed to export power from
itS systEm.  tHe CaL iSo has rEcently BEeN DEraTiNg To zErO TrAnsmiSsiOn
capacIty to the NoRthWeSt (option 3).  BecaUSe TransmissiOn uSers can't get
cApaCity to SeLl tHEir poWer OutsiDe CaliFOrnia, tHe effect iS tHAt the Iso
gets chEAPeR powEr over customers in THe nw.

I was thinking oF a poliTiCAl APProAch To solving tHiS probLEm.  I was
wONdERINg iF You could work wIth your contACts To mobiLiZe Nw senatoRs (?) to
wRiTE a lEtter to the CAlifOrnia ISO aNd the GOVernor; yOU might eVen get
steVe WRighT To SiGn oN gIVen THaT thIS  siTuation mUsT mAke it More
DIFFIculT foR him To balAnce his budget.

the CentRAl tHeme oF the lEtteR wOuld pOint ouT what A hUe and cry there
woUld bE if BPA engAgeD iN suCh ActioNS and thAt CAliFornia iS simply  TRyiNg
TO GEt Cheaper power than thE rEST oF the regiOn.  It coULd AlSO point ouT
tHat The CAL iSO alReadY HaS the mechAnism oF ThE SEcretarY oF EnergY's
secTioN 202(c) ordERs to Get the Power it nEeds fOR an emergency anD That
this order IS fAIReR BecaUse It allows marKet pARticIpanTS tO haVE a jusT and
rEaSOnABle rate determined (alBeIt afteR the fAct) for the poweR.  I wouldn't
bRING up the ISo's auTHoRIty to cut scheduLed poWer transacTIons.  I don'T
thinK we want tO encouragE THat.

What dO yoU thInk?  calL ME. JUst a quick note TO Let yOu Know thaT we Are planNinG to HavE BrAzIl (Power
onLy) launchEd On enRoNOnLine bY february 2001. i wIll UpDatE you sOOn with
The cuRrenT sTaTUs aNd next sTEpS.
pLeasE lEt Me knOw iF yOu havE any QUesTions/coMments
ThaNks
cArloS
x5-8705

---------------------- foRwarded By Carlos AlatoRrE/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000
08:44 aM ---------------------------

remI ColloNGEs
11/30/2000 07:34 PM
To: DaVid Forster/Corp/Enron@EnroN
Cc: Joe KiShkIll/SA/enroN@Enron, CarLos alatorRe/Na/enron@ENron

SuBject: re: enrONonlinE

i Am DelIgHted and thaNKFul.  on our SiDe, I'm Fairly

 Section 202(c) authority) , (2) cutsched ule d p ow er tran sactions, or ( 3 ) de rate transmission capa cityus e d to ex portpower f r om its  s ys tem .Th e Cal  IS O has r ecently be ende rating to ze r otransmissi on
capacity to  th e Nort hw est (opti on3). Becaus e  trans mission u se r s can' t  get
c a p ac ityto sell their pow e ro utside Califor nia, t he ef f e ctisthat the I SO
get s  cheape r  p o w e r o v er customersin the NW.

I  was t hi nki n g of a  poli ti c alapproach to  sol ving this  probl e m.  I w a s
wond eringifyou  cou l dwo rkwi t h y o ur  co n tac ts to mo bi li ze NW  Sen a t o r s (? ) t o
w ritea letter to t heCali f orn ia IS O and  the  G overn or; yo u mig ht  even get
Stev e Wr ight to s ign  o n g iv en th a t this   s itu ation m ust mak e  it  m o r e  difficult for himto b al ance his  budge t . The cent ra l t heme o f the  let t er  would p oint o u twh at a hu eand cr ythe re
woul d  beif BPA  engaged  in s u ch actions and that Californ i ai s  s i mply   t rying
to g et c h eape r po w er  th a n the  rest  o f  t h e region.  It could  a lso po int o ut
that theCal ISO al r e a dy has t he m e ch a nism of the Se creta ry of Ener g y's
Sec tion202(c) o rders tog e t the po wer  it  ne eds f or  an emergency a nd t ha t
this  or der isfai rer  be cau se  it allow s market  p ar ti ci pan ts to have a j us t a nd
r eason a ble ra te de term in ed (al beit af t er t he f ac t)  for  th epower .  I wou ldn't bring upthe ISO' sau thority  to cut sched ul ed power t ra nsa ctions .  I don't
think we want to enco u rage th at.

Wha t do  you thin k? Callme. Just a  quick  note  t o l e t  youk n ow  th at  we are pl a n nin g toha ve B razil ( Power
only) launc h edon EnronOnlin e b y Fe b r ua ry2 00 1 . I  w i llu p date you soon w ith
the c ur r en t status a n d n ex t steps .
Pleas e let me know  if you h ave any q ue stio n s /co mments
Tha nks
Carl os
x5-870 5

--- - -- ----- --- ------ --  Fo rward ed byC arl os Al atorre /N A/Enro n on12 /06/2000
08:44 AM ------------ ------ ----- --- -

RemiCol l ong es
11/30/ 2000  07:34 PMTo:  Da vid F ors t er/Co rp/E n ro n@E n ron
c c: J o e Kishkil l /S A/E n r on @Enron, Car l o s  Al atorr e/N A /Enron @Enr on

Subject: Re: EnronOnline
I a m del igh t ed a nd  thankful.  On  ou rs i de, I'mfa irly

 Section_202(c) authority),_(2) cut scheduled power_
transactions, or_(3)_derate transmission_capacity_used to export_power from
its_system.  The Cal_ISO has recently_been_derating to zero transmission
capacity to the Northwest (option 3).  Because transmission users_can't_get
capacity_to_sell_their power outside California, the_effect is that the ISO_
gets cheaper_power over customers in the NW.

I_was_thinking of a_political approach to solving this problem.  I was_
wondering if you could work with_your contacts to_mobilize_NW_Senators (?) to
write_a letter to the California ISO_and the Governor; you might even_get
Steve Wright to sign on given_that this  situation must make_it more
difficult for him_to balance_his budget.

The central_theme of the_letter would_point out what_a hue and cry there
would_be if BPA_engaged in such actions and that_California_is simply _trying_
to_get cheaper_power than the_rest_of the_region._ It could also point out_
that_the Cal ISO already has the mechanism_of the Secretary of_Energy's_
Section 202(c) orders to_get the power it needs_for an emergency and that
this_order is_fairer because_it allows market participants to have a just and
reasonable rate_determined (albeit after the fact) for_the power.  I_wouldn't
bring_up_the ISO's authority_to_cut scheduled_power transactions.  I don't
think we_want to_encourage that.

What do you think? _Call me. Just a_quick_note to let you know that_we are planning to have Brazil_(Power
only) launched on EnronOnline_by_February_2001. I will update you_soon with
the current status and_next steps.
Please let_me know if you have any questions/comments
Thanks
Carlos
x5-8705

----------------------_Forwarded_by Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000
08:44_AM_---------------------------

Remi Collonges
11/30/2000 07:34 PM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:_Joe_Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron,_Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: EnronOnline_

I am delighted and thankful._ On our side, I'm fairly


 for Tuesday, 6/13, and I plan to
be on vacation on Friday, 6/9.  Therefore, this is the lastest date that we
can meet.  Please make every effort to make this work.

Thanks. We fared well in the prehearing yesterday.  At issue was whether the California refund claims would be decoupled from the supplier/creditor claims of Enron and other sellers to whom California owes money.  For both strategic and tactical reasons, it is critical that these claims be resolved in the same adjudications and ultimate judgments.  In yesterday's prehearing, Enron and other suppliers defeated (at least for now) a very real threat of decoupling.  In addition, Gary Fergus did a very able job at educating the judge on (a) the inadequacies of California's data supporting its refund claims, and (b) the likelihood that California is cooking that data.

Jeffrey D. (Dan) Watkiss
Bracewell & Patterson, LLP
2000 K St., N.W.
Suite 500
Washington, D.C.   20006-1872
(202) 828-5851
dwatkiss@bracepatt.con
jdwatkiss@aol.com Great work Mike!
I will arrange interviews with the London folks while I'm there.
Jen

	From:  Mike A Roberts                           12/14/2000 09:54 AM

To: Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen W
Bennett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: UPDATE - Meteorologist Search

We have identified two good candatites who would be available for a London
interview the week of the 18th:

1. Kerryn Hawke
2. Stephen Cusack

also strong but not available for that week is

3. Piero Chessa (working for ECMWF in Italy)

we have a couple others here in the states if the London interviews don't
work out.

I am forwarding under separate cover Kerryn and Stephen's CV's with telephone
numbers to Jen

- - -  Mike thanks again for keeping me in the know --- I

for Tuesday, 6/13, and I plan to
 be on vacation on Friday, 6/9.   Therefore, this is the lastest date that we
 can meet.   Please seduce every campaign to make this work.

 Thanks. We fared well in the prehearing yesterday.   At return was whether the California refund claims would be decoupled from the supplier / creditor claim of Enron and early sellers to whom California owes money.   For both strategic and tactical reasons, it is critical that these claims be resolved in the like adjudications and ultimate judgments.   In yesterday's prehearing, Enron and other suppliers get the better of (at least for now) a very real threat of decoupling.   In addition, Gary Fergus act a very able job at educating the judge on (a) the inadequacy of California's data supporting its refund claims, and (b) the likelihood that California is cook that data.

 Jeffrey D. (Dan) Watkiss
 Bracewell & Patterson, LLP
 2000 K St., N.W.
 Suite 500
 Washington, D.C.    20006 - 1872
 (202) 828 - 5851
 dwatkiss@bracepatt.con
 jdwatkiss@aol.com Great work Mike!
 I will arrange interviews with the London folk while I'm there.
 Jen

	 From:   Mike A Roberts                            12/14/2000 09:54 AM

 To: Jennifer Fraser / HOU / ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman / HOU / ECT@ECT
 cc: Vince J Kaminski / HOU / ECT@ECT, Jose Marquez / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Stephen W
 Bennett / HOU / ECT@ECT
 Subject: UPDATE - Meteorologist Search

 We have identified two good candatites who would be available for a London
 interview the workweek of the 18th:

 1. Kerryn Hawke
 2. Stephen Cusack

 besides hard but not available for that week is

 3. Piero Chessa (working for ECMWF in Italy)

 we have a couple others here in the states if the London interviews don't
 work out.

 I am forward under separate screen Kerryn and Stephen's CV's with telephone
 numbers to Jen

 - - -   Mike thanks again for sustain me in the know --- I

 fog Tuesday, 6/13, and I plan to
be on vacation on Frivay, 6/9.  Tgerefore, this is the lastest date thet ww
can meet.  Please make evefy effort to make thiw work.

Thanks. We farcb welm in chx prehearing yexterday.  Ad issue was whatfex the California refund claims would be decpuoled from the fuppkyer/cdvdltor claims of Enron and other ssllers uo whom California owes money.  For both strahegif and tactical readons, it is xrityxal that there claims be resolved jn the same adjudications and uutimace judgmentw.  In iesterday's pcehearpng, Enron and other sgpplierx defeated (at keavt dor now) a very real tireat of decoupling.  In addithou, Gary Fergus did a vwrt ablg job at deucxtihg tge judhe kn (a) the ihadequacies of California's dats fllporting its refunq slaims, and (b) the likelihood that Califognia is cooking that data.

Jedfrey D. (Dan) Watkiss
Brwcewell & [atterson, LLP
2000 K St., N.W.
Suite 500
Washington, D.C.   20006-1872
(202) 828-5851
dwatkhss@brecdpaut.gjv
hdaatkiss@aol.com Great work Mike!
I will arrange igfetvpews with the Lonbon folks while O'm tngre.
Jen

	From:  Mike C Rkberts                           12/14/2000 09:54 AM

To: Jenmifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrwy A Shankmau/HOY/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Naminski/HOU/ZCT@ECT, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rtepgen W
Benneht/HOU/ECT@EDG
Subject: UPDATE - Mvteosologist Search

We have idegtified txo gopd candxtitgs who rould be agailanne for a London
inhervigw the week of tje 18th:

1. Kerryn Hawke
2. Stephen Cusarl

also strong bgt tot avaijable for that weeh is

3. Piero Chexsa (worhing wor ECMWF pn Italy)

wx have a cou[le others hesg in the statxs if the Loneon untervidds don't
work oit.

I am fogwcrding uneer separate cover Ketrgn and Stephen's CV'w with telephonr
njmbqrd vo Jeg

- - -  Mike thatks xgakm for keeping me kn tne know --- I

for Tuesday, 6/13, and I plan to vacation Friday, 6/9. this is the meet. make every effort make this work. We fared well in the prehearing At issue was whether the California refund claims would be decoupled from the claims of Enron and other sellers to whom California owes money. For both and reasons, is that these claims be resolved in the same adjudications and ultimate judgments. In yesterday's prehearing, Enron other suppliers defeated (at least for now) a real threat of decoupling. addition, Gary Fergus did a able at educating judge (a) inadequacies of California's supporting its refund claims, and (b) the likelihood that California is cooking that data. Jeffrey D. (Dan) Bracewell & 2000 K N.W. 500 D.C. 20006-1872 (202) jdwatkiss@aol.com Great work Mike! I will the London folks while I'm there. Jen From: A Roberts 09:54 AM To: Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Bennett/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: UPDATE - Meteorologist Search We have identified two good candatites who would be a London interview the of the 18th: Kerryn 2. Cusack strong but available for that week is 3. Piero Chessa (working for ECMWF Italy) we have a couple others here in the states London don't work out. am forwarding under separate Kerryn Stephen's CV's with telephone Jen - again keeping in the know ---

 for Tuesday, 6/13, and I plan to
be on vAcation on FRiday, 6/9.  theRefOrE, thiS is tHe lastest date tHAt we
Can meet.  Please make every EfforT tO Make THiS work.

thanks. WE FaRED weLl In The PrEHeAring YesTerday.  AT issue was wHetHeR the CalifornIA rEfund claimS woUld be decouplEd fRom the SuPplIEr/creDitOr claIms of ENRon and Other sellErS To whom cAlifornIA OwEs moNey.  For both strategIC aND tactical reasoNs, it is CrITiCAL thAt tHese claims Be ResolVEd in the SAmE ADJudICations and ultImate judgmeNTs.  IN yesteRdAy's PRehearIng, EnRoN And Other suppliErs dEfeated (at Least fOR now) a veRY real thReat of DecOupLing.  iN aDdItiOn, gAry fErGus DId a Very able JoB aT educAtinG THE JudgE on (A) the InadeQuacies of CaliForNia's DAta SuppoRting Its rEfUnd clAims, anD (b) the LiKelihood that CalIforNia is cookIng ThAt dAtA.

JeffREy D. (Dan) watKisS
BracewEll & PattERsoN, Llp
2000 k st., n.W.
Suite 500
Washington, D.c.   20006-1872
(202) 828-5851
dWATkIss@bracePatt.coN
JdWaTKiss@aol.cOm greAt woRK mike!
I Will ARrAnge inteRviews WItH tHe LondoN fOlks whIlE I'm TheRe.
Jen

	fRom:  MIke A RoBerts                           12/14/2000 09:54 AM

TO: JennIFer Fraser/HOU/ECt@eCT, Jeffrey A ShANkMAN/Hou/ECT@eCT
Cc: Vince J KamInskI/hOU/EcT@ECt, joSe MARquez/corp/ENrON@EnrON, Stephen W
Bennett/HoU/eCT@ECT
subjeCt: UPDATE - MeteoRologist SeARCH

We have iDentIFiED two good candatItes wHo would be aVAilable fOr a LoNdon
inteRview the wEEK of the 18th:

1. kerRyn hawKe
2. STEPhEn Cusack

also sTROng bUt Not avaiLabLe for thAt wEek Is

3. PIerO CHessa (workIng for ECmWf iN ITaLy)

wE have A Couple otHeRs hErE in The stATes if tHe LonDon iNtErVIewS don't
woRK oUT.

i am fOrWaRdinG unDeR sepaRate COveR Kerryn And StepheN's Cv'S witH tElEphone
nUmbers to Jen

- - -  MiKe Thanks agaiN fOr kEeping ME In the knoW --- I

 for Tuesday, 6/13, and Iplan to
b e onvac ati on  onFrid ay, 6/9.  Ther e fore , this is the lastestdateth a t we
c an me et.  Pl e as e mak eev ery  e f fo rt to  ma ke this  work.

Th ank s.  We fared we l lin the pre hea ring yesterd ay.   At i ss uew as wh eth er th e Cali f orniarefund cl ai m s woul d  be dec o u pl ed f rom the supplier/ c re d itor claims of  Enron  a n do t her  se llers to w ho m Cal i forniao we s m one y .  For both s trategic an d  ta ctical  r eas o ns, it  is c ri t ica l that thes e cl aims be r esolve d  in the same ad judica tio nsandu lt im ate  j u dgm e nt s.Inyesterda y' sprehe arin g , E nron  an d ot her s uppliers defe ate d (a t  le ast f or no w) a  v ery r eal th reatof  decoupling.  I n ad dition, G ary  F erg us  dida  veryabl e j ob at e ducatin g  th ej u d ge  on (a) the inadeq ua c i es  of Cali fornia ' sda t a suppor ti ngitsr e fundclai m s,  and (b)  the l i ke li hood th at  Calif or nia  is  cook i ng t hat da ta.

Jef freyD . (Dan) Watkis s
Bracewell &P at t e rs o n, L LP2000 K St.,  N.W .
Sui te 5 0 0Was h ingto n, D. C.  2 0006-1872
(202) 828 -5 851
dw atkis s@bracepatt.c on
jdwatki s s @ aol.comGrea t  w o rk Mike!
I wil l arr ange inter v iews wit h the  Londonfolks whi l e  I'm the re.
Je n

	From:  Mik e A Ro be rts                    1 2/14/2000  09:54 A M
T o:  Je nnife r  Fraser/ HO U/E CT @EC T, Je f frey A  Shan kman /H OU / ECT @ECT
cc :  V i n ce J  K am insk i/H OU /ECT@ ECT, Jos e Marqu ez/Corp/E nro n @ENR ON ,Stephen  W
Bennett/H OU /ECT@ECT Su bje ct: UP D A TE - Met eorologist Search

We have id ent ified  two  good can dat ites w how ould b e avai lable  f ora Londo n
i nte rv iew the we e k  of  the18 th:
1. Ker ryn Hawke
2. Steph e n C usack

also s tro ng b u t  n ota va i lab le for t hat week is

3.  Piero Che ss a  ( working fo r  EC MW F in It aly)

w e hav e  a coup le others  here inth e st a t esif the Lon don inte rviews do n 't
w o rk  out.

I am f or war dingunders epa ratecoverKe rryn a nd St ep hen's CV 's with telephone
numb ers to  Jen
-- -  Mike  th a nks  again fo r ke eping me i n t heknow--- I

 for_Tuesday, 6/13,_and I plan to_
be on_vacation_on Friday,_6/9._ Therefore, this_is the lastest_date that we
can_meet.  Please_make_every effort to make this work.

Thanks. We fared well in the prehearing yesterday. _At_issue was_whether_the_California refund claims would be_decoupled from the supplier/creditor claims_of Enron_and other sellers to whom California owes money.__For both strategic_and tactical reasons, it is critical that these claims_be resolved in the same adjudications_and ultimate judgments.__In_yesterday's prehearing, Enron and_other suppliers defeated (at least for_now) a very real threat of_decoupling.  In addition, Gary Fergus did_a very able job at educating_the judge on (a) the_inadequacies of_California's data supporting its refund_claims, and (b)_the likelihood_that California is_cooking that data.

Jeffrey D. (Dan) Watkiss
Bracewell_& Patterson, LLP
2000_K St., N.W.
Suite 500
Washington, D.C. __20006-1872
(202) 828-5851
dwatkiss@bracepatt.con
jdwatkiss@aol.com Great_work_Mike!
I_will arrange_interviews with the_London_folks while_I'm_there.
Jen

	From:  Mike_A_Roberts      _   __   _    _     _12/14/2000 09:54_AM

To: Jennifer_Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen W_
Bennett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: UPDATE - Meteorologist Search

We_have identified two good_candatites who_would_be available for_a_London
interview_the week of the 18th:

1. Kerryn Hawke
2._Stephen Cusack

also_strong but not available for that_week is

3. Piero Chessa_(working_for ECMWF in Italy)

we have a_couple others here in the states_if the London interviews don't_
work_out.

I_am forwarding under separate cover_Kerryn and Stephen's CV's with telephone_
numbers to Jen

-_- -  Mike thanks again for_keeping_me in the know --- I