 these new developments, it's important to be clear
on PG&E's motivations. Some California lawmakers and consumer advocates
have called for a complete return to regulation, arguing that deregulation
in California has become a failed experiment. Many have surmised that PG&E's
proposal for wholesale caps is essentially a call to return California
to a regulated structure. I think this is a misinterpretation. PG&E has
very clearly stated that its proposal is a "necessary short-term step to
try to bring prices back in line." PG&E's efforts really shouldn't be viewed
as a move to return California to a regulated market. Rather, PG&E is merely
attempting to protect its own interests. The utility wants to secure
temporary
lower rates for the power it needs to buy on the wholesale market and
transfer
its debts to customers once the rate freeze is lifted. A return to regulation
via a permanent rate cap would not be in PG&E's best interests as it
continues
to sell power from its nuclear plant. In addition, PG&E probably recognizes
that regulation would discourage additional companies from building new
power plants in California, which would not be good for the long-term economy
of the state. This also would do little to lower wholesale prices in
California.
As we discovered this summer, the less supply, the higher the price for
power.

PG&E's proposal to lower rate caps on wholesale prices is, more than anything
else, an attempt to protect itself from what it perceives as disastrous
economic impact if it is not able to transfer its debt to customers. A
recent Wall Street Journal report inferred that if wholesale prices continue
to exceed what PG&E can charge customers, the utility could become
"technically
insolvent" sometime next year. It will be interesting to see if the CPUC
has the same perception when it evaluates PG&E's proposal later this month.

==============================================================
Need to design and implement your IT infrastructure? Learn more about
SCIENTECH's
Information Technology team and what they can do for you at:

 http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/web/Depts-IT.html
===============================================================

these new developments, it's important to be clear
 on PG&E's motivation. Some California lawgiver and consumer advocates
 have called for a accomplished restitution to regulation, arguing that deregulation
 in California has become a fail experiment. Many have surmised that PG&E's
 proposal for sweeping detonator is essentially a call to return California
 to a regulated structure. I think this is a misinterpretation. PG&E has
 very clearly state that its proposal is a " necessary short - term footfall to
 try to bring prices back in line. " PG&E's attempt really shouldn't be viewed
 as a move to return California to a regulated market. preferably, PG&E is merely
 attempting to protect its own interests. The utility wants to secure
 temporary
 lower rates for the power it needs to buy on the wholesale market and
 transfer
 its debts to customers once the rate freeze is pilfer. A return to regulation
 via a permanent rate ceiling would not be in PG&E's best interests as it
 continues
 to deal power from its nuclear plant. In addition, PG&E probably recognizes
 that rule would discourage additional companies from building new
 power plants in California, which would not be good for the long - term economy
 of the state. This also would serve little to turn down wholesale prices in
 California.
 As we discovered this summer, the less supply, the higher the monetary value for
 power.

 PG&E's proposal to lower rate caps on wholesale prices is, more than anything
 else, an attempt to protect itself from what it perceives as black
 economic impact if it is not able to transfer its debt to customers. A
 recent Wall Street Journal report deduce that if wholesale monetary value continue
 to surpass what PG&E can charge customers, the utility program could become
 " technically
 insolvent " sometime next year. It will be interesting to see if the CPUC
 has the same sensing when it evaluates PG&E's proposal later this month.

 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
 Need to design and implement your IT infrastructure? Learn more about
 SCIENTECH's
 Information Technology team and what they can do for you at:

  http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/web/Depts-IT.html
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 thfse new developments, it's important to bg xlear
mn PG&E'a motivagions. Some California lawmakxrs qnd cinsumer advocates
have called flr a complett return to regulefion, arnbing fmat dzrxgulation
in Cakifornia hds become a fahldd experiment. Many have surmised that PG&E's
ptooosal for wholgsale saps ps essentially a call to return Califognia
to a regulatrd structure. I think this ls a misinterpretation. PG&E has
vetg cjwarly stated that its krmposal is z "necessary short-term step to
tfy to bring prixew bwwk in line." 'G&E's esforts realln shoulgn't be fiewed
as a moye to rerurn California to a cegulated market. Ratrer, PG&E iv jerely
attempting ti project hts uqn knttrexta. The ktimity wants to secure
remporary
lower ratts sir the power jt neeqs to buy on the wholesale market and
tratsfsr
its debts to customees once the rate freeee is liftqd. A return to regulation
via a permanent rate ca[ wouma nit cw ln PG&E's best interests as it
continues
to selj ppwvr from its nuclecr plant. In addiyiln, KG&E probably rgcognizza
fhat regulation wokld dissourate additijnal companies from building neq
power planns ib California, which would not ye gooc for the long-term economy
oy the atate. This wlso wouls do little to loder wvolesale prices in
Califorgia.
As we diseovered ghis summew, the less supply, the higher the pgice yor
pmwer.

PG&E's oroposal to lower rate caps on xiolesale pricgs hs, kore thau anytming
else, an ateempt to proteet itsely from what it pvrceives es disastrouf
economic im[wct if it is not ablq to trabsfer igr debt to custpmers. A
rvctnt Wall Srreet Journal repovt inwsrred that if wkuoesale prices cpntknuq
no xxceeq what PG&E cat chxrgd custumers, the ubilkty vould become
"technicdlly
insolvent" sometimr kext year. It will be interestimg to see if the CKUC
hav tie samr pgrception when it evaluates PG&E'a proposap lwter this mogth.

==============================================================
Keed to design and implement your IT infrastructure? Lxarn more about
SCIENTGCH's
Information Techuokogy team aid whae they cat do for you at:

 http://qww.consultrci.com/wtb/rciweb.nsf/web/Depts-IT.htjl
===============================================================

these new developments, it's important to be PG&E's Some California and consumer advocates return regulation, arguing that in California has a failed experiment. Many have surmised PG&E's proposal for wholesale caps is essentially a call to return California to regulated structure. I think this is a misinterpretation. PG&E has very clearly stated its is "necessary step to try to bring prices back in line." PG&E's efforts really shouldn't be viewed as move to return California to a regulated market. PG&E is merely attempting protect its own interests. The wants secure temporary rates the it needs to on the wholesale market and transfer its debts to customers once the rate freeze is lifted. A to regulation permanent rate would be PG&E's best interests continues to sell power from its addition, PG&E probably recognizes that regulation would discourage companies from new power plants in California, which not be good for the long-term economy of state. This also would do little to lower wholesale prices in California. As we discovered the less supply, the the price for PG&E's to rate on wholesale is, more than anything else, an attempt to protect itself from it perceives as disastrous economic impact if it is not transfer debt to customers. recent Wall Street Journal inferred if wholesale prices continue what can utility become insolvent" sometime next year. will be interesting to see the CPUC has the PG&E's proposal later this month. ============================================================== Need to and implement your IT infrastructure? Learn more SCIENTECH's Information Technology team and what they can do for you at: ===============================================================

 these new developments, it's imPortant to bE cleaR
on pG&E'S mOtivAtioNs. Some CalifornIA lawMakers and consumer advocAtes
hAvE CallED fOr a coMplete rETuRN To rEgUlAtiOn, ARgUing tHat DeregulAtion
in CalIfoRnIa has become a FAiLed experimEnt. many have surmIseD that Pg&E'S
prOPosal For WholeSale caPS is essEntially a CaLL to retURn CalifORNiA
to a Regulated structurE. i tHInk this is a misiNterprEtATiON. pG&E Has
Very clearlY sTated THat its pROpOSAL is A "Necessary shorT-term step to
TRy tO bring PrIceS Back in Line." Pg&E'S EffOrts really sHoulDn't be viewEd
as a mOVe to retURn CalifOrnia tO a rEguLateD MaRkEt. RAtHEr, Pg&e iS meREly
AttemptiNg To ProteCt itS OWN InteResTs. ThE utilIty wants to secUre
TempORarY
loweR rateS for ThE poweR it neeDs to bUy On the wholesale mArkeT and
transFer
ItS deBtS to cuSTomers OncE thE rate frEeze is lIFteD. A RETUrN to regulation
via a pErMANeNt rate caP would NOt Be IN PG&E's besT iNteRestS AS it
coNtinUEs
To sell poWer froM ItS nUclear pLaNt. In adDiTioN, PG&e probABly rEcogniZes
that rEgulaTIon would discouRAge additional COmPANiES froM buIlding new
poWer pLAnts In CaLIfOrnIA, whicH woulD nOT bE Good for the long-term eCoNomy
of The stAte. This also woUld do littlE TO Lower whoLesaLE pRIces in
CalifornIa.
As wE discovereD This summEr, the Less suppLy, the highER The price For
PowEr.

Pg&E's PROpOsal to lower raTE Caps On WholesaLe pRices is, MorE thAn aNytHiNg
else, an aTtempt to PrOtEcT iTseLf froM What it peRcEivEs As dIsastROus
ecoNomic ImpaCt If IT is Not able TO tRANsfeR iTs Debt To cUsTomerS. A
reCEnt wall StrEet JournaL rePOrt iNfErRed that If wholesale prIcEs continue
To ExcEed whaT pg&E can chaRge customers, the utility cOUld becoMe
"tEchniCallY
insolvenT" soMetime NexT Year. It Will be InterEsTinG TO see iF THe cPUc
hAs the same pERCepTion wHeN it eValuateS PG&E's proposal later THis Month.

==============================================================
Need to deSigN and IMPlEmeNT yOUr It iNFraSTRucture? Learn morE about
SCIEnTecH'S
InformatiON TeChNology tEam and wHat thEY can do fOr you at:

 htTp://www.consUlTrci.COM/weB/rciweb.nsf/Web/Depts-iT.html
===============================================================

 these new developments, i t's import ant t o b e c le ar on P G&E's motivati o ns.Some California lawmak ers a nd cons u me r adv ocatesha v e  ca ll ed  fo ra  c omple tereturnto regulat ion ,arguing that de regulation
i n California  ha s beco me  af ailed  ex perim ent. M a ny hav e surmise dt hat PG & E's
pr o p os al f or wholesale caps is essentially acall t or et u r n C ali fornia
to  a  regu l ated st r uc t u r e.I  think this i s a misinte r pre tation .PG& E  has verycl e arl y stated th at i ts propos al isa  "neces s ary sho rt-ter m s tep  totr ytobr i ngp ri ces bac k in lin e. "PG&E' s ef f o r t s re all y sh ouldn 't be viewed
as  a m o veto re turnCali fo rniato a r egula te d market. Rathe r, P G&E is me rel y
at te mptin g  to pr ote ctits own  intere s ts.  T h e ut ility wants to sec ur e
t emporary
lowe r  r at e s for th epow er i t needs  tob uy  on thewholes a le  m arket a nd
tran sf er
it s deb t s to  custo mers onc e the rate freeze is lifted. A ret u rn t or egul ati on
via a p erma n entrate ca p w o uld n ot be  i n  P G &E's best interests  a s it conti nues
to sell  power fro m i ts nucle ar p l an t . In addition,  PG&E  probablyr ecognize s
th at regul ation wou l d  discour age  ad dit ion a l  c ompanies from b uild in g new pow er plan tsinCal ifo rn ia, which  would n ot  b ego odfor t h e long-t er m e co nom y
of the st ate.This  a ls o  wo uld dol it t l e to  l ow er w hol es ale p rice s  in
Calif ornia.
A s w e  dis co ve red thi s summer, the  l ess supply ,the  highe r the pric e for
power.

PG&E'sp roposal  to  lowe r ra te caps o n w holesa lep ricesis, mo re th an  an y t hinge ls e,an  attempt t o pro tectit self  from w hat it perceives a s  di sastrous
eco nom ic i m p ac t i f  i t  is  n o t a b l e to transfer i ts debt to  c u st omers. A r ece nt  Wall S treet J ourna l  report  inferred  that ifwh oles a l e p rices cont inue
to  exceed w h at PG & Ecan c har ge cus to mer s, th e util i tycould  becom e
"tech nical ly
insolv ent" sometime next year . It w ill b e i nterestin g t o  se e if theCPUC
has thesam e p ercep tio n  when  ite va lua t es PG &E's proposall at ert h is  month.

= = = = === ===== === = ====== ==== ================= = ============== ==== N eed  to desi gn  and implement  yo ur I T infras tr ucture? Lea rn moreab o ut
S CIENTE CH's Informa t i on Techno logy  te am and wh atth e y can d ofo r  you a t:
 h ttp:// www.co n sult r c i.com/web/rciweb .nsf/ w e b/Dep t s-I T.htm l======= = ==== ========== =========== ====== ==== ===== ======= == ======

 these_new developments,_it's important to be_clear
on_PG&E's_motivations. Some_California_lawmakers and consumer_advocates
have called_for a complete return_to regulation, arguing_that_deregulation
in California has become a failed experiment. Many have surmised that PG&E's
proposal_for_wholesale caps_is_essentially_a call to return California_
to a regulated structure. I_think this_is a misinterpretation. PG&E has
very clearly stated_that_its proposal is_a "necessary short-term step to
try to bring prices_back in line." PG&E's efforts really_shouldn't be viewed_
as_a_move to return California_to a regulated market. Rather, PG&E_is merely
attempting to protect its_own interests. The utility wants to secure_
temporary
lower rates for the power_it needs to buy on_the wholesale_market and
transfer
its debts_to customers once_the rate_freeze is lifted._A return to regulation
via a_permanent rate cap_would not be in PG&E's best_interests_as it
continues_
to_sell_power from_its nuclear plant._In_addition, PG&E_probably_recognizes
that regulation would discourage additional_companies_from building new
power plants in California,_which would not be_good_for the long-term economy_
of the state. This also_would do little to lower wholesale_prices in_
California.
As_we discovered this summer, the less supply, the higher the price_for
power.

PG&E's proposal to lower_rate caps on wholesale_prices is,_more_than anything
else,_an_attempt to_protect itself from what it perceives as_disastrous
economic_impact if it is not able_to transfer its debt_to_customers. A
recent Wall Street Journal_report inferred that if wholesale prices_continue
to exceed what PG&E_can_charge_customers, the utility could become_
"technically
insolvent" sometime next year. It_will be interesting_to see if the CPUC
has the_same_perception when it evaluates PG&E's proposal_later_this month.

==============================================================
Need to design and_implement_your_IT infrastructure? Learn more about_
SCIENTECH's
Information Technology team and what_they can do for you at:

 http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/web/Depts-IT.html
===============================================================


 and natural gas, MSEB can avail of additional natural gas from GAIL
by diverting the gas allocated to RCF. In turn, the Board is expected to pay
up the differential price to RCF. But MSEB, in its reply to a question during
the hearing, stated that fuel (furnace oil) for RCF costs Rs 16,000 per tonne
and if the differential price is to be borne by it, then the cost of power
generated from the Uran plant will be over Rs 4 per unit. This, the Board
claims, will make it an unviable proposal to be implemented.
However, the petitioner has challenged this claim made by MSEB and MERC has
asked to present written submissions before the Commission this week.
MSEB's Uran plant has a capacity of 913 MW, but only around 300 MW is being
generated due to lack of natural gas. This arrangement, initiated by the
ministry to offer more natural gas to MSEB, follows a representation made by
CM Vilasrao Deshmukh last month.
Currently, MSEB has been allocated only 1.6 mmtpa natural gas from GAIL since
the output from ONGC's Bombay High has depreciated in the recent past, said
sources. Union petroleum minister Ram Naik had earlier announced that the
ministry would take all efforts to allocate more natural gas to Uran.
The petition had challenged that MSEB had violated the merit order despatch
and purchased more power from Enron violating the limits set by MERC in its
May 5 order. The Commission will issue an order soon after the petitioners
submit their affidavits responding to MSEB's reply to the charges made
against them.

Copyright, 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron: Preparing for pull out?
Pradipta Bagchi

05/09/2001
The Times of India
Copyright (C) 2001 The Times of India; Source: World Reporter (TM)

MUMBAI: Is Enron preparing to pull out of India? Officially, the answer's
``no''. But in a significant move, the families of the expatriate executives
working in its subsidiary, the Dabhol Power Company (DPC), have

and natural gas, MSEB can avail of additional natural accelerator from GAIL
 by amuse the gas allocated to RCF. In turn, the Board is ask to pay
 up the differential price to RCF. But MSEB, in its answer to a question during
 the hearing, stated that fuel (furnace petroleum) for RCF costs Rs 16,000 per metric ton
 and if the differential price is to be borne by it, then the cost of power
 generate from the Uran plant will be over Rs 4 per unit. This, the Board
 claims, will make it an unviable proposal to be implement.
 However, the petitioner has challenged this claim name by MSEB and MERC has
 asked to present written submissions before the Commission this workweek.
 MSEB's Uran plant has a capacitance of 913 MW, but only around 300 MW is being
 generated due to lack of natural accelerator. This arrangement, initiated by the
 ministry to offer more natural gas to MSEB, follows a representation made by
 CM Vilasrao Deshmukh last month.
 Currently, MSEB has been allocated only 1.6 mmtpa natural gas from GAIL since
 the output from ONGC's Bombay High has depreciated in the late past, say
 sources. marriage petroleum curate Ram Naik had in the first place announced that the
 ministry would take all feat to allocate more natural gas to Uran.
 The petition had challenged that MSEB had rape the merit order despatch
 and purchased more power from Enron rape the limits set by MERC in its
 May 5 order. The Commission will issue an orderliness soon after the petitioner
 submit their affidavits responding to MSEB's reply to the charges cook
 against them.

 Copyright, 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 Enron: Preparing for pull out?
 Pradipta Bagchi

 05/09/2001
 The Times of India
 Copyright (C) 2001 The Times of India; generator: World Reporter (TM)

 MUMBAI: Is Enron preparing to pull out of India? Officially, the answer's
 '` no". But in a meaning move, the families of the expatriate executives
 working in its subsidiary, the Dabhol Power Company (DPC), suffer

 anf natural gas, MSEB can ayail of additionco natucal gas from GAKL
by diverting the gas alloratee to ECF. In turn, the Board ks expectvd to pay
up uhe differential 'dice to RCF. Bhb MSEY, mn its reply to a questiot during
the haafiug, stated that fuel (furnace oil) for WCF cosys Rs 16,000 per tonne
and yf tgv bifferential price is to be borhe by iu, then the cost of power
generated from the Kran plant will be oveg Rs 4 per ubit. Eyis, the Boara
claims, wpnl make it an unviable proposal to be impuemenced.
However, tye ogtitioner haw chajlenged this claim mdde by KSEB and MERC mas
avkee to present written vubmissions before the Commhsaion this week.
MSWB'w Urat pldnt fqs x czpecify of 913 MW, but only zround 300 MW us being
generated cuq to lack of nztural gws. This arrangement, initiated by the
mitisfry to offer more naturql gas to MSEB, followd a reprefentation made by
CM Vilasrao Deshmukh last month.
Currxngly, MFDV jas been allocated only 1.6 mmtpa natural gas frjj BAPL since
the outpmt from ONGC's Bombsy Hodh has depreckated nh fhe recent past, sald
sourses. Ubion petrjleuk minister Ram Naik had earoier announcvd tyat the
ministry wluld take aul egfortx to allocate more natuxal gaa to Uran.
Tje petitikv had challenged thst MSEB had violated the meryt order vespacch
and ourcnased iore power from Enron violating thf limnts sat by MERC in its
May 5 order. The Commission will issue sn orger soon aftev the petitionews
submit theit affidavnts rerponding tk MSEB's reply to tre charges magg
against thek.

Copyrigrt, 2000 Eow Hones & Zumpany, Inc. All Rights Rvstrved.

Enrob: Preparing for pukl uht?
Pradipta Bagckn

05/09/2001
Tye Times of Indoa
Cupywihhv (C) 2001 Eve Times of Hndix; Suirce: Dorld Rt'orber (TM)

MIMBAI: Is Enron prepasing to pull out of Inciw? Officiqlly, the answer's
``no''. Bit in a significanu move, thx famikief of the expatriate executives
working ln lts subsidiarr, thc Dafhol Power Company (DPC), have

and natural gas, MSEB can avail of gas GAIL by the gas allocated Board expected to pay the differential price RCF. But MSEB, in its reply a question during the hearing, stated that fuel (furnace oil) for RCF costs 16,000 per tonne and if the differential price is to be borne by then cost power from the Uran plant will be over Rs 4 per unit. This, the Board claims, will it an unviable proposal to be implemented. However, petitioner has challenged this made by MSEB and MERC asked present written before Commission week. MSEB's Uran has a capacity of 913 MW, but only around 300 MW is being generated due to lack natural gas. initiated by ministry offer natural gas to a representation made by CM Vilasrao Currently, MSEB has been allocated only 1.6 mmtpa gas from since the output from ONGC's Bombay has depreciated in the recent past, said sources. petroleum minister Ram Naik had earlier announced that the ministry would take all efforts to natural gas to Uran. petition had challenged MSEB violated merit despatch and more power from Enron violating the limits set by MERC in May 5 order. The Commission will issue an order soon petitioners their affidavits responding MSEB's reply to the made them. Copyright, 2000 Dow Company, All Preparing pull Pradipta Bagchi 05/09/2001 The of India Copyright (C) 2001 Times of India; Source: Enron preparing to pull out of India? Officially, answer's ``no''. But in a significant move, families of the expatriate executives working in its subsidiary, the Dabhol Power (DPC), have

 and natural gas, MSEB can avail Of additionAl natUraL gaS fRom GaIL
bY diverting the gAS allOcated to RCF. In turn, the BoArd is ExPEcteD To Pay
up The diffEReNTIal PrIcE to rCf. buT MSEB, In iTs reply To a questioN duRiNg
the hearing, STaTed that fueL (fuRnace oil) for RcF cOsts Rs 16,000 PeR toNNe
and If tHe difFerentIAl pricE is to be boRnE By it, thEN the cosT OF pOwer
Generated from the URAn PLant will be over rs 4 per uNiT. thIS, The boaRd
claims, wiLl Make iT An unviaBLe PROPosAL to be implemenTed.
However, tHE peTitionEr Has CHallenGed thIs CLaiM made by MSEB And MeRC has
askEd to prESent wriTTen submIssionS beForE the cOmMiSsiOn THis WEeK.
MSeb's URan plant HaS a CapacIty oF 913 mw, BUt onLy aRounD 300 MW is Being
generateD duE to lACk oF natuRal gaS. ThiS aRrangEment, iNitiaTeD by the
ministry tO offEr more natUraL gAs tO MsEB, foLLows a rEprEseNtation Made by
Cm vilAsRAO deShmukh last month.
CurReNTLy, mSEB has bEen allOCaTeD Only 1.6 mmtpA nAtuRal gAS From GaIL sINcE
the outpUt from onGc's bombay HIgH has dePrEciAteD in thE ReceNt past, Said
sourCes. UnIOn petroleum minISter Ram Naik haD EaRLIeR AnnoUncEd that the
miNistRY wouLd taKE aLl eFForts To allOcATe MOre natural gas to Uran.
thE petitIon haD challenged thAt MSEB had vIOLAted the mErit ORdER despatch
and puRchasEd more poweR From EnroN violAting the Limits set BY mERC in itS
MaY 5 orDer. the cOMmIssion will issUE An orDeR soon afTer The petiTioNerS
suBmiT tHeir affidAvits resPoNdInG tO MSeB's rePLy to the cHaRgeS mAde
AgainST them.

COpyriGht, 2000 DOw joNEs & COmpany, INC. ALL righTs reServEd.

ENrOn: PrePariNG foR pull ouT?
Pradipta bagCHi

05/09/2001
ThE TImEs of IndIa
Copyright (C) 2001 THe times of IndIa; souRce: WorLD reporter (tM)

MUMBAI: Is Enron preparinG To pull oUt oF IndiA? OffIcially, thE anSwer's
``nO''. BuT In a sigNificaNt movE, tHe fAMIlies OF ThE exPaTriate execUTIveS
workInG in iTs subsiDiary, the Dabhol PoweR comPany (DPC), have

 and natural gas, MSEB can  avail ofaddit ion alna tura l ga s from GAIL
b y  div erting the gas allocat ed to  R C F. I n  t urn,the Boa r di s  ex pe ct edto pa y
up  th e diffe rential pr ice  t o RCF. But M S EB , in its r epl y to a quest ion  durin g
th e  hear ing , sta ted th a t fuel  (furnace  o i l) for RCF cos t s  R s 16 ,000 per tonne
a n di f the differen tial p ri c ei s  to  be  borne byit , the n  the co s to f pow e r
generatedfrom the Ur a n p lant w il l b e  overRs 4pe r  un it. This, t he B oard
cla ims, w i ll make it an u nviabl e p rop osal to  b e i mp l eme n te d.How ever, th epe titio nerh a s chal len gedthisclaim made by  MS EB a n d M ERC h as
a sked  t o pre sent w ritte nsubmissions bef orethe Commi ssi on  th is  week .
MSEB 'sUra n plant  has ac apa ci t y of  913 MW, but onlyar o u nd  300 MWis bei n g
g e nerateddu e t o la c k  of n atur a lgas. Thi s arra n ge me nt, ini ti ated b ythe
m inist r y to  offer  more na tural gas to MSEB, f o llows a repre s en t a ti o n ma deby
CM Vila srao Desh mukh la stm onth.
Cur re n tl y , MSEB has been all oc ated o nly 1 .6 mmtpa natu ral gas fr o m GAIL sin ce t he output from ON GC'sBombay Hig h  has dep recia ted in t he recent p ast, sai d sou rce s.U n io n petroleum m i n iste rRam Nai k h ad earl ier  an nou nce dthat the
ministr ywo ul dtak e all effortsto  al lo cat e mor e  natur al ga s to  U ra n . The pet i ti o n  had  c ha llen ged  t hat M SEBh adviolate d the mer ito rder  d es patch and purchased  m ore powerfr omEnronv i olatingthe limits set by MERCi n its May  5 or der.  The Comm iss ion wi lli ssue a n orde r soo naft e r  thep e ti tio ne rs
submit t hei r aff id avit s respo nding to MSEB's re p lyto the charge s m adea ga ins t  t h em.
C opy r i ght, 2000 Dow J ones & Com pa n y,  Inc. AllR igh ts  Reserv ed.

Enron :  Prepar ing for p ull out?Pr adip t a  Ba gchi

05/0 9/2001
T he Timeso f Ind i aCopyr igh t (C)20 01The T imes o f  In dia;Source :WorldRepor te r (TM)
MUMBAI: Is Enron prepar ing to  pull  ou t of Indi a?O ffi cially, t he a nswer's
` `no ''.  Butina  sign ific a nt  mo v e, th e fa m ilies oft he  ex p a tr iate execut i v e s worki ngi n itssubs idiary, the Dabho l  Power Company  (DP C ) , h ave

 and_natural gas,_MSEB can avail of_additional natural_gas_from GAIL_
by_diverting the gas_allocated to RCF._In turn, the Board_is expected to_pay_
up the differential price to RCF. But MSEB, in its reply to a question_during_
the hearing,_stated_that_fuel (furnace oil) for RCF_costs Rs 16,000 per tonne_
and if_the differential price is to be borne by_it,_then the cost_of power
generated from the Uran plant will be_over Rs 4 per unit. This,_the Board
claims,_will_make_it an unviable proposal_to be implemented.
However, the petitioner_has challenged this claim made by_MSEB and MERC has
asked to present_written submissions before the Commission this_week.
MSEB's Uran plant has_a capacity_of 913 MW, but only_around 300 MW_is being_
generated due to_lack of natural gas. This arrangement,_initiated by the_
ministry to offer more natural gas_to_MSEB, follows a_representation_made_by
CM_Vilasrao Deshmukh last_month._
Currently, MSEB_has_been allocated only 1.6 mmtpa natural_gas_from GAIL since
the output from ONGC's_Bombay High has depreciated_in_the recent past, said_
sources. Union petroleum minister Ram_Naik had earlier announced that the_
ministry would_take all_efforts to allocate more natural gas to Uran.
The petition had_challenged that MSEB had violated the_merit order despatch
and_purchased more_power_from Enron violating_the_limits set_by MERC in its
May 5 order._The Commission_will issue an order soon after_the petitioners
submit their_affidavits_responding to MSEB's reply to the_charges made
against them.

Copyright, 2000 Dow_Jones & Company, Inc. All_Rights_Reserved._

Enron: Preparing for pull out?
Pradipta_Bagchi

05/09/2001
The Times of India
Copyright (C) 2001_The Times of_India; Source: World Reporter (TM)

MUMBAI: Is Enron_preparing_to pull out of India? Officially,_the_answer's
``no''. But in a significant_move,_the_families of the expatriate executives_
working in its subsidiary, the Dabhol_Power Company (DPC), have


're sure that Legume's stock will rise,=20
you're probably best off buying its stock. Then if it doesn't=20
behave as you expected it to, you can either sell the shares or=20
hang on patiently.=20

Options are not for beginning investors, and even more advanced=20
investors might consider steering clear.=20

You can read more about options at this Motley Fool FAQ.
http://www.fool.com/FoolFAQ/foolfaq0055.htm

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

SPONSORED BY: Ameritrade
Ameritrade brings you the market's most valuable commodity:
Knowledge.  Get a free 6-month Morningstar.com=AE
Premium Membership when you open an account.
http://www.ameritrade.com/o.cgi?a=3Dxbx&o=3Drkg&p=3D/html/mstar.fhtml

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

're sure that Legume's stock will rise,=20
 you're probably best off buy its lineage. Then if it doesn't=20
 behave as you expected it to, you can either sell the share or=20
 hang on patiently.=20

 Options are not for beginning investor, and even more advanced=20
 investors might consider steering clear.=20

 You can take more about options at this Motley Fool FAQ.
 http://www.fool.com/FoolFAQ/foolfaq0055.htm

 = 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 = 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 = 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

 SPONSORED BY: Ameritrade
 Ameritrade brings you the marketplace's most valuable commodity:
 Knowledge.   Get a detached 6 - calendar month Morningstar.com = AE
 Premium Membership when you open an account.
 http://www.ameritrade.com/o.cgi?a=3Dxbx&o=3Drkg&p=3D/html/mstar.fhtml

 = 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 = 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

're dure that Legume's stock dill rise,=20
you're kribably best kff buyivg its stock. Then if it doesi't=20
beyave qs you expected it to, hou can epther selo tht shares or=20
hang oi patienbjy.=20

Opflons crx not for beginking investmrs, and even mmrd cdvanced=20
investors might consider steqring ckewr.=20

You can read mort afout options at this Motley Fool FAQ.
htfp://www.foml.com/FoolFAQ/fpolfaq0055.htm

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3F=3D=3D=3D=3F=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3F=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3E=3D=3D=3D=3Q=3E=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

SPUNSORED BY: Ameritrade
Ajeritrade brings you the market'r mosc valuable xonmofhty:
Knowledgx.  Get a free 6-montm Mornitgstar.cpm=AE
Premium Mekbecship when you open an acrount.
http://www.ameritraqe.com/o.cgi?d=3Drbx&o=3Drkg&p=3D/html/mstar.fhrmo

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3G=3D=3D=3D=3G=3D=3D=3D=3A=3E=3D=3D=3A=3D=3D=3S=3D=3V=3D=3D=3S=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3F=3D=3D

're sure that Legume's stock will rise,=20 best buying its Then if it it you can either the shares or=20 on patiently.=20 Options are not for investors, and even more advanced=20 investors might consider steering clear.=20 You can read about options at this Motley Fool FAQ. http://www.fool.com/FoolFAQ/foolfaq0055.htm =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D SPONSORED BY: Ameritrade you market's valuable commodity: Knowledge. Get a free 6-month Morningstar.com=AE Premium Membership when you open an account. http://www.ameritrade.com/o.cgi?a=3Dxbx&o=3Drkg&p=3D/html/mstar.fhtml =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

're sure that Legume's stock wilL rise,=20
you're ProbaBly BesT oFf buYing Its stock. Then if IT doeSn't=20
behave as you expected It to, yOu CAn eiTHeR sell The sharES oR=20
HAng On PaTieNtLY.=20

OPtionS arE not for Beginning iNveStOrs, and even moRE aDvanced=20
invEstOrs might consIdeR steerInG clEAr.=20

You Can Read mOre aboUT optioNs at this MOtLEy Fool faQ.
http://wWW.FoOl.coM/FoolFAQ/foolfaq0055.htM

=3d=3D=3d=3d=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3d=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3d=3D=
=3d=3d=3D=3d=3d=3d=3D=3D=3d=3D=3D=3d=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3d=3D=3d=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3d=3d=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3d=3d=3D=3d

spoNSorED BY: AmeritraDe
AmeritradE BriNgs you ThE maRKet's moSt valUaBLe cOmmodity:
KnoWledGe.  Get a freE 6-month mOrningsTAr.com=AE
premiuM MeMbeRshiP WhEn You OpEN an ACcOunT.
HttP://www.amerItRaDe.com/O.cgi?A=3dXBX&o=3DrKg&p=3d/htmL/mstaR.fhtml

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3d=3D=3D=3d=3D=3D=3D=3d=3d=3D=3D=3d=3D=3D=3D=3D=3d=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3d=3D=3D=3D=3d

're sure that Legume's sto ck will ri se,=2 0
y ou' re  pro babl y best off buy i ng i ts stock. Then if it d oesn' t= 2 0
be h av e asyou exp e ct e d  it  t o,  yo uc an  eith ersell th e shares o r=2 0hang on pati e nt ly.=20

Op tio ns are not f orbeginn in g i n vesto rs,  andeven m o re adv anced=20in v estors might c o n si dersteering clear.=2 0
Y ou can read mo re abo ut op t i ons  at  this Motl ey  Fool FAQ.
ht t p: / / w ww. f ool.com/FoolF AQ/foolfaq0 0 55. htm

=3 D=3 D =3D=3D =3D=3 D= 3 D=3 D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3 D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3 D =3D=3D= 3 D=3D=3D =3D=3D =
= 3D= 3D=3 D =3 D= 3D= 3D = 3D= 3 D= 3D= 3 D=3 D=3D=3D= 3D =3 D=3D= 3D=3 D = 3 D =3D= 3D= 3D=3 D=3D= 3D=
=3D=3D=3D =3D =3D= 3 D=3 D=3D= 3D=3D =3D= 3D =3D=3 D=3D
SPONS OR ED BY: Ameritra de
A meritrade  br in gsyo u the market 'smos t valua ble com m odi ty : K no wledge.  Get a fre e6 - mo nth Morn ingsta r .c om = AE
Premi um  Me mber s h ip wh en y o uopen anaccoun t .ht tp://ww w. amerit ra de. com /o.cg i ?a=3 Dxbx&o =3Drkg&p =3D/h t ml/mstar.fhtml
=3D=3D=3D=3D = 3D = 3 D= 3 D=3D =3D =3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D = 3D=3 D=3D = 3D =3D = 3D=3D =3D=3 D= 3 D= 3 D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D =3D=3D

're sure_that Legume's_stock will rise,=20
you're probably_best off_buying_its stock._Then_if it doesn't=20
behave_as you expected_it to, you can_either sell the_shares_or=20
hang on patiently.=20

Options are not for beginning investors, and even more advanced=20
investors might consider_steering_clear.=20

You can_read_more_about options at this Motley_Fool FAQ.
http://www.fool.com/FoolFAQ/foolfaq0055.htm

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

SPONSORED BY: Ameritrade
Ameritrade brings_you the_market's most valuable commodity:
Knowledge.  Get a free_6-month_Morningstar.com=AE
Premium Membership when_you open an account.
http://www.ameritrade.com/o.cgi?a=3Dxbx&o=3Drkg&p=3D/html/mstar.fhtml

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D


ano, Steve; Sullivan, Kathleen; Staines, Dan; Briggs, Tom; Robertson, Linda; Novosel, Sarah; Fulton, Donna; Alvarez, Ray; Allegretti, Daniel; Yoho, Lisa; Migden, Janine; Ryall, Jean; Keeler, Jeff; Bolton, Stacey; Schoen, Mary; Dernehl, Ginger; McVicker, Maureen; Noske, Linda J.; Schmidt, Ann M.; Linnell, Elizabeth; O'connell, Earlene
Cc: Kean, Steven J.
Subject: RE: California Campaign Closeout
Importance: High

A follow-on to Janel's comments: I wanted to comment a bit on the " California campaign", our group's(internal and external) individual and collective efforts, and the work that continues: While I may be properly, and not surprisingly, characterized as "non-practicing"(in a formal religious sense), I do believe quite firmly that what we do in life( and how we do it) echoes through eternity...it is the effort and the quality of the effort in all that we do in our lives that both matters and echoes...While we engage in work that cannot be equated with the work of people, past and present, such as Mother Teresa, the work we do is good, very good in fact, and makes a significant difference to the 18,000 Enron employees and their families...Each of you, in the context of the broad "campaign" to communicate the rightness of our perspective and to protect the good name of the company and individuals within the company, has put forth a great effort that has been performed with excellence and that has made a significant and positive difference....and that has succeeded in many respects thus far....I understand the effort continues, but each of you should feel very proud now.... about what we have done and how we have done it. Thanks very much.

-----Original Message-----
From: Guerrero, Janel
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:18 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Comnes, Alan; Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Frank, Robert; Neustaedter, Robert; Bev Hansen (E-mail); Hedy

ano, Steve; Sullivan, Kathleen; Staines, Dan; Briggs, Tom; Robertson, Linda; Novosel, Sarah; Fulton, Donna; Alvarez, Ray; Allegretti, Daniel; Yoho, Lisa; Migden, Janine; Ryall, Jean; Keeler, Jeff; Bolton, Stacey; Schoen, Mary; Dernehl, Ginger; McVicker, Maureen; Noske, Linda J.; Schmidt, Ann M.; Linnell, Elizabeth; O'connell, Earlene
 Cc: Kean, Steven J.
 Subject: RE: California Campaign Closeout
 Importance: High

 A follow - on to Janel's comments: I want to gloss a bit on the " California campaign ", our group's(internal and external) individual and corporate efforts, and the oeuvre that continues: While I may be properly, and not amazingly, characterize as " non - practicing"(in a formal religious common sense), I do think quite firmly that what we do in life sentence (and how we do it) echoes through eternity... it is the effort and the quality of the campaign in all that we do in our lives that both matters and echoes... While we engage in employment that cannot be equated with the work of people, past and present, such as Mother Teresa, the oeuvre we do is good, very good in fact, and makes a meaning difference to the 18,000 Enron employee and their families... Each of you, in the context of the broad " campaign " to communicate the correctness of our perspective and to protect the good name of the company and individuals within the company, has place forth a great effort that has been performed with excellence and that has made a significant and positive difference.... and that has succeeded in many respects thus far.... I sympathize the attempt continues, but each of you should palpate very gallant immediately.... about what we have done and how we have done it. Thanks very a lot.

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Guerrero, Janel
 Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:18 PM
 To: Shapiro, Richard; Palmer, Mark A. (public relations); Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Comnes, Alan; Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Frank, Robert; Neustaedter, Robert; Bev Hansen (E - mail); Hedy

ano, Steve; Sullivan, Kathleen; Staines, Dan; Brntgs, Tok; Robedtson, Livda; Novosel, Sarah; Fulton, Donia; Aovaree, Ray; Allegretti, Daviel; Yoho, Lisa; Mitden, Hanine; Ryall, Jean; Keeler, Meff; Yooton, Stacey; Scmoen, Mary; Darnehl, Ginger; KcXieker, Maureen; Noske, Linda J.; Schmidt, Agn M.; Limnfll, Elizabeth; J'conmqll, Sarlene
Cc: Kean, Steven J.
Subject: RE: Daliforiia Campaign Clpseout
Importance: High

A folpow-oj to Janel's commenhs: I wanted to simment a bit on the " California cajpaign", our group's(internal and ebterncl) individuql anf collective effogts, and the work that continies: While I man be 'ropwrly, and not surprisiigly, characterized af "non-pracdieing"(in a formal religuoys setse), H do velkevt qnits firmpy vhat what ws do in lifw( and how we do it) tchjvx through etsrnity...yt is the effort and the quality of the exfodt in all that we do in our lives that both latters agd echoes...While we engage in work that cannot be exuatev ditk the dirn of people, past and present, such as Mother Tqdexa, the work we dj is good, vrrj bjod in fact, avd makza z significant difffrence jo the 18,000 Enron eiplouees and their families...Each of you, in tke xontext of the brocd "campaign" co comkunicste the rightness of oux perslective and to protedg the good name uf nhe wompany and individuals wiehin the rompauy, has pjt fprth a great efflrt tmdt has been perforled wnth efcellence wnd that has made a significant and positive cixfegence....and chat hss succeeded yn many respecjs thus fcr....I unaerstand tge effoct continues, but each of flu should fexl very pwoud now.... about dfat we have dome and hoc we yave done it. Thankx vgrg much.

-----Original Neswage-----
From: Guerreto, Ganql
Sxnt: Wqgnesday, Auguvt 22, 2001 5:18 PO
Yo: Shxpiro, Richavd; Oalmrr, Mark A. (PR); Steffes, Jamss D.; Kaufman, Paul; Cafovich, Jgff; Mara, Fusan; Comnes, Slan; Kingerski, Hargy; Laxner, Lxslie; Gragk, Robert; Neustaedter, Robert; Bsv Hansen (E-mwil); Hedy

ano, Steve; Sullivan, Kathleen; Staines, Dan; Briggs, Linda; Sarah; Fulton, Alvarez, Ray; Allegretti, Ryall, Keeler, Jeff; Bolton, Schoen, Mary; Dernehl, McVicker, Maureen; Noske, Linda J.; Schmidt, M.; Linnell, Elizabeth; O'connell, Earlene Cc: Kean, Steven J. Subject: RE: California Campaign Importance: High A follow-on to Janel's comments: I wanted to comment a bit the California our and external) individual and collective efforts, and the work that continues: While I may be properly, not surprisingly, characterized as "non-practicing"(in a formal religious I do believe quite that what we do in and we do echoes eternity...it the effort and quality of the effort in all that we do in our lives that both matters and echoes...While engage in cannot be with work people, past and as Mother Teresa, the work we very good in fact, and makes a significant to the Enron employees and their families...Each of in the context of the broad "campaign" to the rightness of our perspective and to protect the good name of the company and the company, has put a great effort has performed excellence that has a significant and positive difference....and that has succeeded in many respects far....I understand the effort continues, but each of you should proud about what we done and how we done Thanks very much. -----Original Guerrero, Sent: 2001 PM Shapiro, Richard; Palmer, Mark (PR); Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Leslie; Frank, Robert; Neustaedter, Robert; Bev Hansen (E-mail);

ano, Steve; Sullivan, Kathleen; STaines, Dan; BRiggs, tom; robErTson, lindA; Novosel, Sarah; FULton, donna; Alvarez, Ray; AllegreTti, DaNiEL; YohO, liSa; MigDen, JaniNE; RYALl, JEaN; KEelEr, jEfF; BoltOn, STacey; ScHoen, Mary; DeRneHl, ginger; McVickER, MAureen; NoskE, LiNda J.; Schmidt, ANn M.; linnelL, ELizABeth; O'ConNell, EArlene
cC: Kean, STeven J.
SubJeCT: RE: CalIFornia CAMPaIgn CLoseout
Importance: hIgH

a follow-on to JanEl's comMeNTs: i WAntEd tO comment a bIt On the " cAlifornIA cAMPAigN", Our group's(inteRnal and exteRNal) IndiviDuAl aND colleCtive EfFOrtS, and the work That Continues: while I MAy be proPErly, and Not surPriSinGly, cHArAcTerIzED as "NOn-PraCTicIng"(in a foRmAl ReligIous SENSE), I do BelIeve Quite Firmly that whaT we Do in LIfe( And hoW we do It) ecHoEs thrOugh etErnitY...iT is the effort and The qUality of tHe eFfOrt In All thAT we do iN ouR liVes that Both matTErs AnD ECHoEs...While we engage in wOrK THaT cannot bE equatED wItH The work oF pEopLe, paST And prEsenT, SuCh as MothEr TereSA, tHe Work we dO iS good, vErY goOd iN fact, ANd maKes a siGnificanT diffERence to the 18,000 EnroN Employees and tHEiR FAmILies...eacH of you, in the ContEXt of The bROaD "caMPaign" To comMuNIcATe the rightness of our PeRspectIve anD to protect the Good name of THE Company aNd inDIvIDuals within the CompaNy, has put foRTh a great EfforT that has Been perfoRMEd with exCelLenCe aNd tHAT hAs made a signifICAnt aNd PositivE diFferencE....anD thAt hAs sUcCeeded in mAny respeCtS tHuS fAr....I UnderSTand the eFfOrt CoNtiNues, bUT each oF you sHoulD fEeL VerY proud nOW.... aBOUt whAt We Have DonE aNd how We haVE doNe it. ThaNks very muCh.

-----ORIginAl meSsage-----
FrOm: Guerrero, JanEl
sent: WednesDaY, AuGust 22, 2001 5:18 PM
tO: shapiro, RIchard; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); StefFEs, James d.; KaUfman, paul; dasovich, JEff; mara, SuSan; cOmnes, ALan; KinGerskI, HArrY; lAwner, lESlIe; FRaNk, Robert; NeUSTaeDter, RObErt; BEv HanseN (E-mail); Hedy

ano, Steve; Sullivan, Kath leen; Stai nes,Dan ; B ri ggs,  Tom ; Robertson, L i nda;  Novosel, Sarah; Fulto n, Do nn a ; Al v ar ez, R ay; All e gr e t ti,  D an iel ;Y oh o, Li sa;  Migden , Janine;Rya ll , Jean; Keel e r,  Jeff; Bol ton , Stacey; Sc hoe n, Mar y;  De r nehl,  Gi nger;  McVic k er, Ma ureen; No sk e , Lind a  J.; Sc h m id t, A nn M.; Linnell, E l iz a beth; O'connel l, Ear le n eC c : K ean , Steven J .Subje c t: RE:C al i f o rni a  Campaign Clo seout
Impor t anc e: Hig h

A follow -on t oJ ane l's comment s: I  wanted t o comm e nt a bi t  on the  " Cal ifo rni a ca m pa ig n",  o u r g r ou p's ( int ernal an dex terna l) i n d i v idua l a nd c ollec tive efforts,  an d th e  wo rk th at co ntin ue s: Wh ile Imay b eproperly, and n ot s urprising ly,  c har ac teriz e d as " non -pr acticin g"(in a for ma l r el igious sense), I d ob e li eve quit e firm l yth a t what w edoin l i f e( an d ho w  w e do it)  echoe s  t hr ough et er nity.. .i t i s t he ef f ortand th e qualit y oft he effort in a l l that we doi no u rl ives  th at both mat ters andecho e s. ..W h ile w e eng ag e  i n  work that cannot b eequate d wit h the work of  people, p a s t  and pre sent ,  s u ch as Mother T eresa , the work we do is  good , very g ood in fa c t , and ma kes  asig nif i c an t differencet o  the  1 8,000 E nro n emplo yee s a ndthe ir  families ...Eachof  y ou ,inthe c o ntext of  t hebr oad  "cam p aign"to co mmun ic at e  th e right n es s of o ur  p ersp ect iv e and  top rot ect the  good nam e o f  the  c om pany an d individuals  w ithin theco mpa ny, ha s put fort h a great effort that h a s beenper forme d wi th excell enc e andtha t  has m ade asigni fi can t and p o s it ive  d ifference. . . .an d tha thassucceed ed in many respect s  th us far....I u nde rsta n d  t hee ff o rtco n tin u e s, but each ofyou should  f e el  very prou d  no w. ... abo ut what  we h a ve done  and howwe have d on e it . Tha nks very m uch.

-- ---Origin a l Mes s ag e---- -
F rom: G ue rre ro, J anel S ent : Wed nesday ,August  22,20 01 5:18PM
To: Shapiro, Richard ; Palm er, M ark  A. (PR);  St e ffe s, JamesD.;Kaufman, P aul ; D asovi ch, Jeff;  Mar a ,Sus a n; Co mnes ,  Alan; Ki n ge rsk i ,  H arry; Lawne r , Les lie;Fra n k, Rob ert;  Neustaedter, Rob e rt; Bev Hansen  (E- m a il) ; H e dy

ano, Steve;_Sullivan, Kathleen;_Staines, Dan; Briggs, Tom;_Robertson, Linda;_Novosel,_Sarah; Fulton,_Donna;_Alvarez, Ray; Allegretti,_Daniel; Yoho, Lisa;_Migden, Janine; Ryall, Jean;_Keeler, Jeff; Bolton,_Stacey;_Schoen, Mary; Dernehl, Ginger; McVicker, Maureen; Noske, Linda J.; Schmidt, Ann M.; Linnell, Elizabeth;_O'connell,_Earlene
Cc: Kean,_Steven_J.
Subject:_RE: California Campaign Closeout
Importance: High

A_follow-on to Janel's comments: I_wanted to_comment a bit on the " California campaign",_our_group's(internal and external)_individual and collective efforts, and the work that continues:_While I may be properly, and_not surprisingly, characterized_as_"non-practicing"(in_a formal religious sense),_I do believe quite firmly that_what we do in life( and_how we do it) echoes through eternity...it_is the effort and the quality_of the effort in all_that we_do in our lives that_both matters and_echoes...While we_engage in work_that cannot be equated with the_work of people,_past and present, such as Mother_Teresa,_the work we_do_is_good, very_good in fact,_and_makes a_significant_difference to the 18,000 Enron employees_and_their families...Each of you, in the context_of the broad "campaign"_to_communicate the rightness of_our perspective and to protect_the good name of the company_and individuals_within the_company, has put forth a great effort that has been performed_with excellence and that has made_a significant and positive_difference....and that_has_succeeded in many_respects_thus far....I_understand the effort continues, but each of_you should_feel very proud now.... about what_we have done and_how_we have done it. Thanks very_much.

-----Original Message-----
From: Guerrero, Janel
Sent: Wednesday,_August 22, 2001 5:18 PM
To:_Shapiro,_Richard;_Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Steffes,_James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff;_Mara, Susan; Comnes,_Alan; Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Frank, Robert;_Neustaedter,_Robert; Bev Hansen (E-mail); Hedy


 our vineyard guy for some names and he will be getting back to
me shortly.  He thinks the best person is probably someone from KJ who does a
lot of stuff up there.  Should have it soon.  He was not overly encouraging
in terms of making money!
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 10:04 AM
To: Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com
Subject:

Great to see you guys, and despite all the excitement, it was alot of fun.
Hope that you made it back safely.  Couple of things:
   I'd like to talk to several vineyard consultants, so if it ain't too
   much trouble, and you've got a name, I'd love to check around.
   Can I order two cases of coastal zin?
   What about the champagne?  How much per magnum is it?
Best,
Jeff For your information.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 02:36
PM ---------------------------

"Notestine, Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com> on 12/04/2000 10:34:33 PM
To: "'knotestine@mciworldcom.net'" <knotestine@mciworldcom.net>
cc: "Cummings, Vicki" <VCummings@littler.com>
Subject: Recent ASAP on AAP issues

I am sending you our most recent ASAP.  Our ASAP's are our summaries of
recent developments in employment matters.  This ASAP addresses the recent
changes in the regulations related to affirmative action plans.  Employers
which have contracts with the federal government, or contracts with federal
contractors, must prepare and maintain affirmative action plans (AAPs) as
long as they employ 50 or more employees, when the contracts are for $50,000
or more. The changes addressed in this ASAP are quite technical and require
careful consideration.
http://www.littler.com/nwsltr/asap_fed_affirmact.html

Please double click on the above link to

our vineyard guy for some names and he will be getting back to
 me shortly.   He thinks the good person is credibly someone from KJ who does a
 lot of material up there.   Should have it soon.   He was not excessively encouraging
 in terms of making money!
 -----Original Message-----
 From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [ mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com ]
 transport: Monday, February 12, 2001 10:04 master of arts
 To: Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com
 Subject:

 Great to see you guys, and despite all the agitation, it was alot of fun.
 Hope that you made it back safely.   Couple of thing:
    I'd like to talk to several vineyard consultants, so if it ain't too
    much fuss, and you've got a name, I'd love to check about.
    Can I order two cases of coastal zin?
    What about the champagne?   How much per magnum is it?
 Best,
 Jeff For your information.   Michelle

 ---------------------- forward by Michelle Cash / HOU / ECT on 12/05/2000 02:36
 PM ---------------------------

 " Notestine, Kerry " < KNotestine@littler.com > on 12/04/2000 10:34:33 PM
 To: "' knotestine@mciworldcom.net' " < knotestine@mciworldcom.net >
 cc: " Cummings, Vicki " < VCummings@littler.com >
 topic: Recent ASAP on AAP issues

 I am sending you our about recent ASAP.   Our ASAP's are our summaries of
 recent developments in employment matters.   This ASAP addresses the recent
 changes in the regulations related to affirmative action plans.   Employers
 which have contracts with the union politics, or contracts with federal
 contractors, must organize and maintain affirmative action plan (AAPs) as
 long as they employ 50 or more employees, when the contracts are for $ 50,000
 or more. The changes address in this ASAP are quite technical and require
 careful consideration.
 http://www.littler.com/nwsltr/asap_fed_affirmact.html

 Please double click on the above link to

 oug vineyard guy for some kames and he will be gevting bzck to
md shortly.  He thinks the besv peeson us probably someone frum KJ who does a
oot id stuff up there.  Should mave nt soon.  He was kot overly ancouraging
in tdrls of making money!
-----Original Message-----
Srom: Jegf.Fasovich@enron.cjm [msylto:Nvfn.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, Fegruary 12, 2001 10:04 AM
To: Nancu.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com
Skbjeft:

Great to see yok guys, and eespyre all the ebcitement, pc was alot kf fun.
Hope that you made it bazk sayely.  Couplg kf jhings:
   I'd like to talk to several eineyarc consultants, xo mf ir ain't too
   much trmuble, and you've goj a name, I'g move to check aroyne.
   Wan H orawr gwo cesea of clasval zin?
   Shat about rhe champagne?  How kusy per magnum js it?
Feft,
Jeff For your information.  Michelle

---------------------- Xorsarded by Michelle Cash/YOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 02:36
PM ---------------------------

"Notestlne, Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com> on 12/04/2000 10:34:33 PM
To: "'knotestine@mciworlgcom.nxt'" <knitcstivw@mfiworldcom.net>
cc: "Cummings, Vicki" <VCummings@littlqd.cpm>
Subject: Recenb ASAP on AAP issurs

L si sending you our most recent ASAP.  Our WSAP's ate our summarief of
tecent developments in empliyment mattegs.  Rhis ASAP addressed the recenc
changgs in yhe regulations related to zffirmative action pmxns.  Employers
whkch hdve contracts with the fedqral govecnmenc, or congracjs with federal
cojtracbmrs, must prepare ajd manntait affirmatlve action plans (AAPs) as
long as they employ 50 pr moge employzes, whcn the contractf are for $50,000
or mpre. The chanees addresaed in vhis ASAP arq quite technhfal and requmre
carefuj cobsidwration.
fgtp://www.littler.cpm/nwsltr/asap_fed_affiemact.html

Please domble zmick on the abort lunk to

our vineyard guy for some names and be back to shortly. He thinks someone KJ who does lot of stuff there. Should have it soon. He not overly encouraging in terms of making money! -----Original Message----- From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com] Monday, February 12, 2001 10:04 AM To: Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com Subject: Great to see you and all excitement, was alot of fun. Hope that you made it back safely. Couple of things: I'd like talk to several vineyard consultants, so if it too much trouble, and got a name, I'd love check Can I two of zin? What about champagne? How much per magnum is it? Best, Jeff For your information. Michelle ---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle on 12/05/2000 --------------------------- "Notestine, <KNotestine@littler.com> 12/04/2000 PM To: "'knotestine@mciworldcom.net'" "Cummings, Vicki" <VCummings@littler.com> Subject: Recent ASAP I am sending you our most recent ASAP. ASAP's are summaries of recent developments in employment This ASAP addresses the recent changes in the related to affirmative action plans. Employers which have contracts with the federal government, or contracts contractors, must prepare and affirmative action plans as as employ or more when the contracts are for $50,000 or more. The changes addressed this ASAP are quite technical and require careful consideration. http://www.littler.com/nwsltr/asap_fed_affirmact.html click the above link

 our vineyard guy for some nameS and he will Be getTinG baCk To
me ShorTly.  He thinks the BEst pErson is probably someone From Kj wHO doeS A
lOt of sTuff up tHErE.  sHouLd HaVe iT sOOn.  he was Not Overly eNcouraging
In tErMs of making moNEy!
-----original MeSsaGe-----
From: Jeff.DaSovIch@enrOn.Com [MAilto:jefF.DasoVich@enROn.com]
SEnt: Monday, feBRuary 12, 2001 10:04 Am
to: Nancy.sELlErs@RObertMondavi.com
SuBJeCT:

Great to see you Guys, anD dESpITE alL thE excitemenT, iT was aLOt of fun.
hOpE THAt yOU made it back saFely.  Couple oF ThiNgs:
   I'd lIkE to TAlk to sEveraL vINeyArd consultaNts, sO if it ain't Too
   mucH Trouble, ANd you've Got a naMe, I'D loVe to CHeCk AroUnD.
   can i OrDer TWo cAses of coAsTaL zin?
   WHat aBOUT The cHamPagnE?  How mUch per magnum iS it?
best,
jEff for yoUr infOrmaTiOn.  MicHelle

---------------------- FOrwarDeD by Michelle Cash/hOU/EcT on 12/05/2000 02:36
PM ---------------------------

"NotEstInE, KeRrY" <KNotEStine@lIttLer.Com> on 12/04/2000 10:34:33 PM
to: "'knoteSTinE@mCIWOrLdcom.net'" <knotestine@McIWOrLdcom.net>
Cc: "CummINgS, VICki" <VCummInGs@lIttlER.Com>
SuBjecT: reCent ASAP On AAP iSSuEs

i am sendInG you ouR mOst RecEnt ASap.  Our aSAP's aRe our sumMarieS Of
recent develoPMents in employMEnT MAtTErs.  THis aSAP addressEs thE ReceNt
chANgEs iN The reGulatIoNS rELated to affirmative aCtIon plaNs.  EmpLoyers
which haVe contractS WITh the fedEral GOvERnment, or contraCts wiTh federal
cONtractorS, must Prepare aNd maintaiN AFfirmatiVe aCtiOn pLanS (aaPS) as
long as they EMPloy 50 Or More empLoyEes, when The ConTraCts ArE for $50,000
or morE. The chanGeS aDdReSseD in thIS ASAP are QuIte TeChnIcal aND requiRe
carEful CoNsIDerAtion.
htTP://wWW.LittLeR.cOm/nwSltR/aSap_feD_affIRmaCt.html

PLease doubLe cLIck oN tHe Above liNk to

 our vineyard guy for some  names and  he w ill  be  g etti ng b ack to
me sho r tly.   He thinks the best p erson  i s  pro b ab ly so meone f r om K J w ho  d oes  a
l ot of  st uff upthere.  Sh oul dhave it soon .  He was not  ov erly encoura gin g
inte rms of ma kin g mon ey!
-- - --Orig inal Mess ag e -----From: J e f f. Daso vich@enron.com [m a il t o:Jeff.Dasovic h@enro n. c om ]
Se nt:  Monday, F eb ruary 12, 200 1  1 0 : 0 4 A M
To: Nancy.S ellers@Robe r tMo ndavi. co m S ubject :

G re a t t o see you g uys,  and desp ite al l  the ex c itement , it w asalo t of fu n.
H op e  th a tyou mad e it bac ksa fely.   Co u p l e  ofthi ngs:
  I'd like to t alk  tos eve ral v ineya rd c on sulta nts, s o ifit  ain't too
  much  trouble,  an dyou 'v e got a name , I 'dlove to  checka rou nd .   Can I order two c as e s  o f coasta l zin?
 W hat abou tthe  cha m p agne?   Ho w  m uch permagnum is  i t?
Bes t,
Jeff  F oryou r inf o rmat ion. Michelle

--- - -------------- - --- Forwarded by M ic h elle  Ca sh/HOU/ECTon 1 2 /05/ 2000 02 :36
PM - ----- -- - -- - ---------------

" No testin e, Ke rry" <KNotest ine@little r . c om> on 1 2/04 / 20 0 0 10:34:33 PMTo: " 'knotestin e @mciworl dcom. net'" <k notestine @ m ciworldc om. net >
c c:" C um mings, Vicki" < VCum mi ngs@lit tle r.com>
Su bje ct:  Re ce nt ASAP o n AAP is su es

I  am  send i ng you o ur  mo st  re centA SAP. Our A SAP' sar e  ou r summa r ie s of
r ec en t de vel op ments  ine mpl oymentmatters. Th i s AS AP  a ddresse s the recentch anges in t he  re gulati o n s relate d to affirmative action plans. Em ploye rs
w hich have  co ntract s w i th the  feder al go ve rnm e n t, or c on tra ct s with fed e r alcontr ac tors , mustprepare and mainta i n a ffirmative ac tio n pl a n s(AA P s) aslo n g a s they employ 50or more em pl o ye es, when t h e c on tractsare for  $50, 0 00
or m ore. Thechanges a dd ress e d  in  this ASAP  are qui te techni c al an d  r equir e
c areful  c ons idera tion.h ttp ://ww w.litt le r.com/ nwslt r/ asap_fed _affirmact.html

Please  doubl e cli ckon the ab ove lin k to

 our_vineyard guy_for some names and_he will_be_getting back_to_
me shortly. _He thinks the_best person is probably_someone from KJ_who_does a
lot of stuff up there.  Should have it soon.  He_was_not overly_encouraging_
in_terms of making money!
-----Original Message-----_
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Monday,_February 12,_2001 10:04 AM
To: Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com
Subject:

Great to_see_you guys, and_despite all the excitement, it was alot of fun._
Hope that you made it back_safely.  Couple_of_things:_
   I'd_like to talk to several vineyard_consultants, so if it ain't too_
   much trouble, and you've_got a name, I'd love to_check around.
  _Can I_order two cases of coastal_zin?
 _ What_about the champagne?_ How much per magnum is_it?
Best,
Jeff_For your information.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded_by_Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on_12/05/2000_02:36_
PM ---------------------------

"Notestine,_Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com> on_12/04/2000_10:34:33 PM
To:_"'knotestine@mciworldcom.net'"_<knotestine@mciworldcom.net>
cc: "Cummings, Vicki" <VCummings@littler.com>
Subject: Recent_ASAP_on AAP issues

I am sending you our_most recent ASAP. _Our_ASAP's are our summaries_of
recent developments in employment matters._ This ASAP addresses the recent
changes_in the_regulations related_to affirmative action plans.  Employers
which have contracts with the federal_government, or contracts with federal
contractors, must_prepare and maintain affirmative_action plans_(AAPs)_as
long as they_employ_50 or_more employees, when the contracts are for_$50,000
or more._The changes addressed in this ASAP_are quite technical and_require
careful_consideration.
http://www.littler.com/nwsltr/asap_fed_affirmact.html

Please double click on the above_link to


Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject:	April deal

	Got a call from El Paso asking to begin deal on 4/4???? let me know  what you want to do and

	El Paso's contract that will be picking up gas....

	Thanks Lynda I double-checked with Bob, and he said Prebon reported these two trades as
peak. The other two were in fact reported as off-peak - he just entered them
incorrectly. But as far as this sleeve goes, there's no way one side is peak
and the other isn't - Prebon has to make up their minds!

Again, let me know what you find out. Until then, we recognize the two trades
as they are.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:59 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

That's what I was confused about because Prebon shows this deal as peak and
we show it as peak and I know it is the other side of a sleeve.  Can you
double check with Bob for accuracy.

Evelyn

   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:43 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

Does this mean that 598738 should be off peak hours as well? Because 598739
is only one side of a sleeve deal for EES. I would think that both sides need
to have the same hours......

Let me know, and I'll change them accordingly.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:43 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

sorry it is 598739

   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:25 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

598736 and 598737 have been changed to off-peak hours.

Cc: 	 Nacey, Sheila
 Subject: 	 April deal

	 Got a margin call from El Paso ask to begin deal on 4/4? ?? ? let me sleep together   what you want to do and

	 El Paso's contract that will be nibble up natural gas....

	 Thanks Lynda I double - crack with Bob, and he said Prebon reported these two deal as
 peak. The other two were in fact report as off - point - he just enroll them
 incorrectly. But as far as this sleeve go, there's no way one side is peak
 and the early isn't - Prebon has to make up their mind!

 Again, let me acknowledge what you find out. Until then, we recognize the two trades
 as they are.

 Thanks,
 Kate

 Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
 05/02/2001 08:59 AM
 To: Kate Symes / PDX / ECT@ECT
 cc:

 Subject: Re: Prebon softwood errors from yesterday

 That's what I was confused about because Prebon shows this deal as peak and
 we show it as peak and I know it is the other side of a sleeve.   Can you
 double check with Bob for accuracy.

 Evelyn

    Kate Symes @ ECT                 05/02/2001 10:43 AM

 To: Evelyn Metoyer / Corp / Enron@ENRON
 cc:

 Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

 Does this entail that 598738 should be off peak hours equally well? Because 598739
 is merely one english of a sleeve deal for EES. I would think that both side need
 to have the same hours......

 lease me know, and I'll change them accordingly.

 Thanks,
 Kate

 Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
 05/02/2001 08:43 AM
 To: Kate Symes / PDX / ECT@ECT
 cc:

 Subject: Re: Prebon deal error from yesterday

 sorry it is 598739

    Kate Symes @ ECT                 05/02/2001 10:25 AM

 To: Evelyn Metoyer / Corp / Enron@ENRON
 cc:

 Subject: Re: Prebon deal error from yesterday

 598736 and 598737 have been changed to off - vertex hours.

Cc:	Nwcey, Sheila
Subject:	April aeal

	Got a call yeom El Paso zsking tu begin deal on 4/4???? let me know  qhat tou want to do and

	El Pxso's contgact that wilo be pickinj up gas....

	Bkanks Pyndc M double-checked with Bob, dnd he said Prabun reported these two trades as
peak. Ehe othrr two were in fwct ge[ortsd as off-peak - he just entered thej
incorgectly. But as far as this sleeve goes, there'd no way one side is pfak
and the othqe isn't - Prebun has to make up theit minds!

Again, let me know what yoj finb out. Until tyen, fe recognizx the nwo trades
as they ara.

Thanks,
Late

Evelyn Metpyec@ENRIN
05/02/2001 08:59 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDE/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Rg: Prebon daam errors from yesreeday

Thad's wfqt K wzs cknfusef auout becauss Prebon shiws this deal as pesk qnd
we show if as pqah and I know it is the other side of a vlesve.  Can you
double chexk with Bob for accurwcy.

Evelyn

   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:43 AM

To: Evelyn Matoyec/Curp/Tnvjv@WNGON
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesesrcaj

Does this mean that 598738 shoukd br off peak houts as wzml? Because 598739
is only lne sidg of a sleeve dtal fpr EES. I would think that bith sides nevd
ti have the same hobrs......

Let me knuw, amd I'lk change them accordinguy.

Thznks,
Kate

Evepyn Metoysf@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:43 AM
To: Katd Sjmes/[DX/ECT@ECU
zc:

Subject: Re: Prqbon deal errprs froo yexterdar

sorry ih is 598739

   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:25 WM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Te: [reton deal errovs from yesterdwy

598736 and 598737 have been ckanged to off-peai hours.

Cc: Nacey, Sheila Subject: April deal Got from Paso asking begin deal on you to do and Paso's contract that be picking up gas.... Thanks Lynda double-checked with Bob, and he said Prebon reported these two trades as peak. other two were in fact reported as off-peak - he just entered them But far this goes, there's no way one side is peak and the other isn't - Prebon has to up their minds! Again, let me know what find out. Until then, recognize the two trades as are. Kate Evelyn 05/02/2001 AM Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday That's what I was confused about because Prebon shows this deal peak and it as and know is the other a sleeve. Can you double check accuracy. Evelyn Kate Symes @ ECT 05/02/2001 10:43 To: Evelyn cc: Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors yesterday Does this mean that 598738 should be peak hours as well? Because 598739 is only one side of a sleeve deal for would think that both need to have same Let know, I'll change accordingly. Thanks, Kate Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON 05/02/2001 08:43 AM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday sorry it is Symes ECT 05/02/2001 10:25 To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Re: deal errors from yesterday 598737 been hours.

Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject:	April Deal

	Got a caLl froM El pasO aSkinG to bEgin deal on 4/4???? let mE Know  What you want to do and

	El PaSo's coNtRAct tHAt Will bE pickinG Up GAS....

	ThAnKs lynDa i DoUble-cHecKed with bob, and he saId PReBon reported tHEsE two trades As
pEak. The other tWo wEre in fAcT rePOrted As oFf-peaK - he jusT EntereD them
incoRrECtly. BuT As far as THIs SleeVe goes, there's no way ONe SIde is peak
and thE other IsN'T - PREBon Has To make up thEiR mindS!

again, leT Me KNOW whAT you find out. UnTil then, we reCOgnIze the TwO trADes
as tHey arE.

THAnkS,
Kate

Evelyn metoYer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:59 Am
To: KatE symes/PDx/eCT@ECT
cC:

SubjeCt: RE: PrEbon DEaL eRroRs FRom YEsTerDAy

THat's what i wAs ConfuSed aBOUT BecaUse prebOn shoWs this deal as pEak And
wE ShoW it as Peak aNd I kNoW it is The othEr sidE oF a sleeve.  Can you
dOublE check witH BoB fOr aCcUracy.

eVelyn

   KAte symEs @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:43 AM

to: EvelyN metOyER/cOrP/Enron@ENRON
cc:

SubjeCt: rE: prEbon deal Errors FRoM yESterday

DOeS thIs meAN That 598738 sHoulD Be Off peak hOurs as WElL? BEcause 598739
iS oNly one SiDe oF a sLeeve DEal fOr EES. I Would thiNk thaT Both sides need
tO Have the same hoURs......

lET mE Know, And i'll change thEm acCOrdiNgly.

tHaNks,
kAte

EvElyn MEtOYeR@eNRON
05/02/2001 08:43 AM
To: Kate Symes/PdX/eCT@ECT
Cc:

SubJect: Re: Prebon dEal errors fROM YesterdaY

sorRY iT Is 598739

   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:25 aM

To: EVelyn MetoyER/Corp/EnrOn@ENRoN
cc:

SubjEct: Re: PrebON Deal erroRs fRom YesTerDAY

598736 aNd 598737 have been chaNGEd to OfF-peak hoUrs.

Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject: 	April dea l

Got  aca ll f romEl Paso asking to b egin deal on 4/4???? l et me  k n ow w ha t you  want t o  d o and
	E l P as o 's  cont rac t thatwill be pi cki ng  up gas....	T hanks Lynd a I  double-chec ked  withBo b,a nd he  sa id Pr ebon r e ported  these tw ot radesa s
peak . Th e ot her two were in f a ct reported as of f-peak  - he j ust  en tered them  incor r ectly.B ut a s  fa r  as this slee ve goes, th e re' s no w ay  on e  sideis pe ak
an d the other  isn 't - Preb on has to make up thei r mind s!
Ag ain, le tmekn o w w h at  yo u  fi nd out.Un ti l the n, w e r e cogn ize  the  twotrades
as th eyare.
Th anks,
Kate

E velyn  Metoy er@EN RO N
05/02/2001 08 :59AM
To: Ka teSy mes /P DX/EC T @ECT
c c:
Subject : Re: P r ebo nd e a lerrors from yester da y

That's  whatI  w as confused  a bou t be c a use P rebo n  s hows thi s deal as  p eak and  we sho witaspeaka nd I  knowit is th e oth e r side of a sl e eve.  Can you
d o u bl e  che ckwith Bob fo r ac c urac y.
E ve lyn

  Kat eS ym e s @ ECT              05/0 2/200 1 10:43 AM

T o: EvelynM e t oyer/Cor p/En r on @ ENRON
cc:

S ubjec t: Re: Pre b on dealerror s from y esterday
Does th ismea n t hat 5 98 738 should be o ff p ea k hours  as  well?Bec aus e 5 987 39
is only  one sid eof  a  s lee ve de a l for EE S.  Iwo uld  thin k  thatbothside sne e d to have th e same  h ou rs.. ... .
Letme k n ow,  and I' ll change  th e m ac co rd ingly.
Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn M et oye r@ENRO N 05/02/20 01 08:43 AM
To: Kate Sy m es/PDX/ ECT @ECTcc:

Subjec t:Re: Pr ebo n  dealerrors  from  y est e r day so rry  i t is 59873 9

   K at e Sy mes @ E CT               0 5/0 2/2001 10:25AM
To: E ve lyn Me t oye r/ C orp / E nron@ENRON
cc:

Subject :R e:  Prebon de a l e rr ors fro m yeste rday

59873 6 and 598 737 havebe en c h a nge d to off-p eak hour s.

Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject:	April_deal

	Got a_call from El Paso_asking to_begin_deal on_4/4????_let me know_ what you_want to do and

	El_Paso's contract that_will_be picking up gas....

	Thanks Lynda I double-checked with Bob, and he said Prebon reported_these_two trades_as_
peak._The other two were in_fact reported as off-peak -_he just_entered them
incorrectly. But as far as this_sleeve_goes, there's no_way one side is peak
and the other isn't_- Prebon has to make up_their minds!

Again, let_me_know_what you find out._Until then, we recognize the two_trades
as they are.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:59_AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon_deal errors from yesterday

That's_what I was confused about_because Prebon_shows this deal as peak_and
we show_it as_peak and I_know it is the other side_of a sleeve._ Can you
double check with_Bob_for accuracy.

Evelyn

 __Kate_Symes @_ECT  __ __     __  05/02/2001 10:43 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:_

Subject: Re: Prebon_deal_errors from yesterday _

Does this mean that 598738_should be off peak hours as_well? Because_598739
is_only one side of a sleeve deal for EES. I would_think that both sides need
to_have the same hours......

Let_me know,_and_I'll change them_accordingly.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn_Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:43_AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon_deal errors_from yesterday

sorry it is_598739

   Kate_Symes_@ ECT    _     _    _05/02/2001_10:25_AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:_Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday_

598736 and_598737 have been changed to off-peak hours.


 or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** I'm available anytime.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lisa Bills                           07/17/2000 09:13 AM

To: Thomas Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Herman
Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Peoples document

Thomas, given that I just put a call into you on the same subject matter, it
would be helpful for my benefit, accounting's and legal's benefit and to try
to be timely for the People's development team, if you would arrange a
meeting as soon as possible so we can all get on the same page.

Thanks, Lisa

Roseann Engeldorf
07/17/2000 09:04 AM
To: Thomas Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Peoples document

Are you available for a meeting today to discuss the captioned?   The lawyers
are a bit unclear as to what the commercial ends and means are w.r.t. these
turbines - e.g., do we have a DASH - do we want an option vs. a purchase, are
we "stepping in" to the People's WLB structure or are they keeping the
financing for "our benefit", etc?

Thanks,

Rose O.K.   just give me a buz when the deal is entered.

 Thanks!!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:13 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing deal?

Tracy just told me this counterparty (PPL Montana) is still pending credit.
Mike Swerzbin said he would prefer to wait this out, because he stands to
make money on the deal. So in the meantime, I've been told by credit that we
can't enter the deal in the system and calc it. I'm not

or any other party, and may not be
 relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
 Thank you.
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I'm available anytime.

	 Enron North America Corp.

	 From:   Lisa Bills                            07/17/2000 09:13 amplitude modulation

 To: Thomas Suffield / Corp / Enron@ENRON
 cc: Roseann Engeldorf / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann / Corp / Enron@Enron, Herman
 Manis / Corp / Enron@ENRON

 national: Re: Peoples document

 Thomas, given that I just invest a call into you on the same discipline matter, it
 would be helpful for my benefit, accounting's and legal's benefit and to test
 to be timely for the People's development team, if you would arrange a
 confluence as soon as possible so we can all draw on the same page.

 Thanks, Lisa

 Roseann Engeldorf
 07/17/2000 09:04 AM
 To: Thomas Suffield / Corp / Enron@ENRON
 cc: Lisa Bills / Corp / Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann / Corp / Enron@Enron

 Subject: Re: Peoples document

 Are you available for a meeting today to discourse the captioned?    The lawyers
 are a bit indecipherable as to what the commercial ends and means are w.r.t. these
 turbines - e.g., do we experience a DASH - do we want an option vs. a purchase, are
 we " stepping in " to the People's WLB social organization or are they keeping the
 financing for " our benefit ", etc?

 Thanks,

 Rose O.K.    just give me a buz when the deal is entered.

  Thanks! !

    Kate Symes @ electroconvulsive therapy                 03/13/2001 04:13 autopsy

 To: Evelyn Metoyer / Corp / Enron@ENRON
 cc:

 Subject: Re: Missing deal?

 Tracy just told me this counterparty (PPL Montana) is still pending credit.
 Mike Swerzbin said he would prefer to expect this out, because he stand to
 make money on the hand. therefore in the meantime, I've been told by credit that we
 can't figure the softwood in the system and calc it. I'm not

 or any other party, and may not be
relied ou by anbone as the basks of a contract by estoppel oe othtgwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** I'm avaklable anjtime.

	Ebron Borth Amermda Corp.

	Nxom:  Mlsa Bnlos                           07/17/2000 09:13 AM

To: Thmmxs Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Roseann Eggeldorg/Clrp/Enron@ENRON, Hay Kwnn/Ckgp/Tnron@Enron, Herman
Manis/Corp/Enron@EHRON

Suuject: Re: Peoplex document

Thomas, given tjat L just put a call lnto you on the wame subject matter, it
would be hempful for my benefit, accounting'r and legal's bebedit dnd to try
vo be nimely for thc Peopla's devekopment team, in you woyld arrange a
meeting as soon as possibje so we wau all get on the same pqge.

Thdnks, Lisx

Eosdanh Xngsldorf
07/17/2000 09:04 AJ
To: Thomas Suffield/Coep/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lisa Byols/Corp/Enron@EHRON, Kwy Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Peoples gochment

Are you availablw for a meeting today to discufs the captioned?   The lawyers
are a bit unclear ds to dhau bme cunmfrcial ends and means are w.r.t. these
turbines - s.g., dp we have a DAFH - do we wsnh sg option vs. a purchcae, are
we "stepping ij" to thg Peopoe's WLB suructire or are they keeping the
financing fje "our benefit", etc?

Tkanks,

Rose O.K.   jost gife me a buz when the decl is sntered.

 Thajks!!

   Kats Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:13 KO

To: Evelyn Metoyew/Corp/Enroi@ENROU
cc:

Subgect: Re: Mifsing deal?

Tragf just told me thid couuterpdrty (PPL Mlntana) is still pending credit.
Mike Swerzbin xahd ve would prefcr to wait this out, because hg stands co
makd money on the deel. So in the meantime, I've heen told by credit ehat we
xan't engdr the deal in the systvm and calc it. I'm not

or any other party, and may not on anyone as basis of a Thank ********************************************************************** I'm available Enron North America From: Lisa Bills 07/17/2000 09:13 AM Thomas Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Peoples document given that I just put a call into you on the same subject it be for benefit, accounting's and legal's benefit and to try to be timely for the People's development team, you would arrange a meeting as soon as so we can all on the same page. Thanks, Roseann 07/17/2000 09:04 To: Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Subject: Re: Peoples document Are you available for a meeting today to discuss the captioned? The lawyers a bit to what commercial and are w.r.t. these e.g., do we have a DASH want an option vs. a purchase, are we in" to People's WLB structure or are they the financing for "our benefit", etc? Thanks, Rose just give me a buz when the deal is entered. Thanks!! Kate Symes @ ECT PM To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Missing Tracy told this (PPL Montana) still pending credit. Mike Swerzbin said he would prefer to wait out, because he stands to make money on the deal. the I've been told credit that we can't the in the system and I'm

 or any other party, and may not bE
relied on bY anyoNe aS thE bAsis Of a cOntract by estopPEl or Otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** I'm avaIlablE aNYtimE.

	enRon NoRth AmerICa cORp.

	FRoM:  LIsa biLLs                           07/17/2000 09:13 aM

To: THomAs SuffiEld/Corp/EnrOn@EnRoN
cc: Roseann ENGeLdorf/Corp/ENroN@ENRON, Kay ManN/CoRp/EnroN@ENroN, hermaN
MaNis/CoRp/EnroN@eNRON

SUbject: Re: PEoPLes docUMent

ThoMAS, gIven That I just put a call INtO You on the same suBject mAtTEr, IT
WouLd bE helpful foR mY beneFIt, accouNTiNG'S And LEgal's benefit aNd to try
to be TImeLy for tHe peoPLe's devElopmEnT TeaM, if you would ArraNge a
meetiNg as soON as possIBle so we Can all Get On tHe saME pAgE.

ThAnKS, LiSA

ROseANn ENgeldorf
07/17/2000 09:04 aM
to: thomaS SufFIELD/CorP/EnRon@EnRON
cC: Lisa Bills/CorP/EnRon@EnrON, kay MaNn/CorP/EnrOn@enron

subjecT: Re: PeOpLes document

Are yOu avAilable foR a mEeTinG tOday tO DiscusS thE caPtioned?   the lawyERs
aRe A BIT uNclear as to what the cOmMERcIal ends aNd meanS ArE w.R.T. these
tuRbIneS - e.g., dO WE have A DASh - Do We want an Option VS. a PuRchase, aRe
We "stepPiNg iN" to The PeOPle's wLB strUcture or Are thEY keeping the
finANcing for "our beNEfIT", EtC?

thanKs,

ROse O.K.   just giVe me A Buz wHen tHE dEal IS enteRed.

 ThAnKS!!

   KATe Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:13 PM

To: EvelyN MEtoyer/corp/ENron@ENRON
cc:

SuBject: Re: MisSING deal?

TraCy juST tOLd me this counteRpartY (PPL MontanA) Is still pEndinG credit.
MIke SwerzbIN Said he woUld PreFer To wAIT tHis out, because HE StanDs To
make mOneY on the dEal. so iN thE meAnTime, I've beEn told by CrEdIt ThAt wE
can't ENter the dEaL in ThE syStem aND calc iT. I'm noT

 or any other party, and m ay not berelie d o n b yanyo ne a s the basis of a co ntract by estoppel orother wi s e.
T h an k you .
***** * ** * * *** ** ** *** ** * ** ***** *** ******* ********** *** ** ************ * **  I'm avail abl e anytime.

	Enr on  No r th Am eri ca Co rp.
	From: Lisa Bil ls                    07/17/2000 09 : 13 AM

To: Thom as Suf fi e ld / C orp /En ron@ENRONcc : Ros e ann Eng e ld o r f /Co r p/Enron@ENRON , Kay Mann/ C orp /Enron @E nro n , Herm an
M an i s/C orp/Enron@E NRON

Subjec t: Re: Peoples documen t

T hom as,  giv e nth atIj ust pu t a cal l into y ou  o n the  sam e s u bjec t m atte r, it
would be he lpf ul f o r m y ben efit,  acc ou nting 's and  lega l' s benefit and t o tr y
to betim el y f or  theP eople' s d eve lopment  team,i f y ou w o ul d arrange a
meeti ng a ssoon aspossib l eso we can a ll  ge t on t he sa me p a ge .

Thank s, Lis a

Roseann  E ngeldo rf
07 /17 /2000 09:0 4 AM
T o: Thoma s Suf f ield/Corp/Enro n @ENRON
cc: Li s aB i ll s /Cor p/E nron@ENRON,  Kay Mann /Cor p /E nro n @Enro n

S ub j ec t : Re: Peoples docum en t

A re yo u available f or a meeti n g today to  dis c us s  the captioned ?   T he lawyers
are a b it un clear as  to whatt h e commer cia l e nds  an d me ans are w.r.t . thes e
turbin es- e.g.,  do  we  ha veaDASH - do  we want  a nop ti onvs. a purchase ,are  we"step p ing in " tothePe op l e's  WLB st r uc t u re o rar e th eyke eping  the
fi nancing  for "our  be n efit ",  e tc?

T hanks,

RoseO. K.   justgi veme a b u z  when th e deal is entered.

 Th a nks!!

  Kate  Sym es @ ECT           03/1 3/2001  04:1 3PMT o: Ev e l yn  Me to yer/Corp/E n r on@ ENRON
c c:

Subje ct: Re: Missing de a l?

Tracy jus t t oldm e  t his co u nte rp a rty ( PPL Montana) is  still pen di n gcredit.
M i keSw erzbinsaid he  woul d  prefer  to waitthis out,  b ecau s e  he  stands to
make m oney on t h e dea l .So in  th e mean ti me,  I've  beent old  by c reditth at we
can' tenter th e deal in the system an d calc  it.I'm  not

 or_any other_party, and may not_be
relied on_by_anyone as_the_basis of a_contract by estoppel_or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** I'm_available anytime.

 __
	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lisa Bills       __ ___    _    _ _  07/17/2000 09:13 AM

To: Thomas Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Roseann_Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON,_Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Herman_
Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Peoples document

Thomas, given that_I just put a call into_you on the_same_subject_matter, it
would be_helpful for my benefit, accounting's and_legal's benefit and to try
to_be timely for the People's development team,_if you would arrange a
meeting_as soon as possible so_we can_all get on the same_page.

Thanks, Lisa

Roseann Engeldorf
07/17/2000_09:04 AM
To:_Thomas Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lisa_Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Peoples_document

Are_you available for a meeting today_to_discuss the captioned?___The lawyers_
are a bit_unclear_as to_what_the commercial ends and means are_w.r.t._these
turbines - e.g., do we have_a DASH - do_we_want an option vs._a purchase, are
we "stepping_in" to the People's WLB structure_or are_they keeping_the
financing for "our benefit", etc?

Thanks,

Rose O.K.   just give_me a buz when the deal_is entered.

 Thanks!!

 _ Kate_Symes_@ ECT __ _      _ _  03/13/2001 04:13 PM

To: Evelyn_Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:_Missing_deal?

Tracy just told me_this counterparty (PPL Montana) is still_pending credit.
Mike Swerzbin said_he_would_prefer to wait this out,_because he stands to
make money_on the deal._So in the meantime, I've been told_by_credit that we
can't enter the_deal_in the system and calc it._I'm_not


 I would ask that you work with Gerald Nemec of the EWS legal department.  He's been overseeing the Napoleonville work and will be able to oversee and work with Keith Daigle and Roger Westbrook on the Crawfish Right-of -Way work.

I have recently joined the Enron Industrial Markets legal team and am divesting of all my former Gas Assets and Trading work.  Gerald can be reached at 3-3512.

Thanks,

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Israni, Rakhi
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:44 AM
To:	Van Hooser, Steve
Cc:	Johnson, Patrick
Subject:	Status Updates

Steve,

I was hoping you could help me with the following two issues.  I am not sure who in legal is working on these.

1) Crawfish Right-of-Ways (counterparty:  Bridgeline) - Bridgeline is requesting ROWs/easements on the Crawfish land in LA.  Keith Daigle, I suppose, is the one who would be actually drafting the agreements.  Roger Westbrook recently received the plats and general descriptions which are to be attached to the agreements.  Would you know the status on these documents?

2) Napoleonville (counterparty: Texas Brine) - Texas Brine purchase approximately 16.6 acres from Enron at the Napoleonville Salt Dome earlier this year.  Texas Brine is attempting to clear title for this land.  The executed documents from the sale of the land from Enron Storage Co to Bridgeline Storage Co and then from Bridgeline Storage Co to LRCI.  were apparently never filed at the courthouse.  Texas Brine is very eager to get this cleared up.  Do you know whether Legal has these documents?

Thanks for your help,

Rakhi
(x-37871) I've got an idea.  Howzabout Ted cooks and you clean up?  Seriously, though,
I'll try to host next time at my humble apartment.

	Jacqueline Kelly <JKelly@FairIsaac.com>
	11/09/2000 01:31 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:

I would ask that you work with Gerald Nemec of the EWS legal department.   He's been overseeing the Napoleonville work and will be able to oversee and make with Keith Daigle and Roger Westbrook on the Crawfish Right - of -Way workplace.

 I have recently joined the Enron Industrial Markets legal team and am divesting of all my former Gas Assets and Trading study.   Gerald can be reached at 3 - 3512.

 Thanks,

 Steve

  -----Original Message-----
 From: 	 Israni, Rakhi
 Sent: 	 Friday, August 24, 2001 9:44 AM
 To: 	 Van Hooser, Steve
 Cc: 	 Johnson, Patrick
 discipline: 	 Status Updates

 Steve,

 I was hoping you could help me with the come two issues.   I am not sure who in legal is work on these.

 1) Crawfish Right - of - Ways (counterparty:   Bridgeline) - Bridgeline is requesting row / easement on the Crawfish land in LA.   Keith Daigle, I suppose, is the one who would be actually drafting the agreements.   Roger Westbrook recently received the plat and general descriptions which are to be attached to the agreement.   Would you know the status on these document?

 2) Napoleonville (counterparty: Texas Brine) - Texas Brine purchase approximately 16.6 estate from Enron at the Napoleonville Salt Dome earlier this year.   Texas Brine is attempting to clear title for this farming.   The executed documents from the sale of the land from Enron Storage Co to Bridgeline Storage Co and then from Bridgeline Storage Co to LRCI.   were apparently never filed at the courthouse.   Texas Brine is very eager to get this cleared up.   Do you know whether Legal has these documents?

 Thanks for your help,

 Rakhi
 (x-37871) I've got an idea.   Howzabout Ted cooks and you clean up?   Seriously, though,
 I'll try to host following time at my humble apartment.

	 Jacqueline Kelly < JKelly@FairIsaac.com >
	 11/09/2000 01:31 phase modulation

		  To: "' Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com' " < Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com >
		  cc:

 I aould ask that you work dith Gerald Nemgc of thx EWS lsgal depxrtment.  He's been overseeing tye Nakjleonville work ana will be able to ovecsee and work wivg Keith Daigls and Coger Westbrook on the Crdwfish Right-of -Wxy work.

I have recently joined the Enrjn Induxtgial Markets lggal ueai ans am divesting of all my former Gaa Assetv and Trading work.  Gerald can be reachfd ah 3-3512.

Thanks,

Steve

 -----Origlnal Messagg-----
Rroi: 	Israni, Rakhk
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:44 AM
To:	Van Hooser, Steve
Cc:	Johnson, Patrnck
Subject:	Sjcrus Opdates

Steve,

M was roping you could hel[ me wiyh the followikg twm iwsues.  I am not sure xho in legal is workyng on thasz.

1) Crawfish Right-of-Wqyw (coutter[arth:  Bfidfekihe) - Brldgxline is resuesting ROQs/easements on the Vrwqfish land in LA.  Kqieh Daigle, I suppose, is the one who woulg bs actually drafting the agreements.  Roger Wedtbrook rqcently received the plats and general descriptiots whmcf axc gi he attached to the agreements.  Would you know fht snatus on these doguments?

2) Napolepngikje (counterparjy: Texas Bdine) - Texas Brine ourchasg appriximately 16.6 actes from Enron at the Napolwonville Saln Done earlier this yecr.  Texas Brnne is attekpting to clear title fur tgis land.  Tje executsa documents from thv sane of tht land from Enron Ftorage Ci to Bridgeuine Storade Co and hhen nsom Bridgeline Stogage Eo to LRCI.  werf apparently never filed at the courthouse.  Tgxav Bgine is vzry eaner to get this cleared up.  Dp you kuow whdther Legam has tiese documenes?

Thanks xlr your help,

Cakhi
(x-37871) I'vq gor an idea.  Fuwzabout Ted cpoks and job clean up?  Seriously, thougm,
I'll fry to host nexc uine at my humblr aoaremvnt.

	Oacquqnine Kelly <JNellh@FaktIsaaz.com>
	11/09/2000 01:31 PM

		 Ti: "'Jefg.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jexf.Daaovich@enron.com>
		 cc:

I would ask that you work with of EWS legal He's been overseeing be to oversee and with Keith Daigle Roger Westbrook on the Crawfish Right-of work. I have recently joined the Enron Industrial Markets legal team and am of all my former Gas Assets and Trading work. Gerald can be reached 3-3512. Steve Message----- Israni, Rakhi Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:44 AM To: Van Hooser, Steve Cc: Johnson, Patrick Status Updates Steve, I was hoping you could me with the following issues. I am not sure in is working these. Crawfish (counterparty: Bridgeline) - is requesting ROWs/easements on the Crawfish land in LA. Keith Daigle, I suppose, is the one who be actually agreements. Roger recently the and general descriptions to be attached to the agreements. the status on these documents? 2) Napoleonville (counterparty: Brine) - Brine purchase approximately 16.6 acres from at the Napoleonville Salt Dome earlier this year. Brine is attempting to clear title for this land. The executed documents from the sale land from Enron Storage to Bridgeline Storage and from Storage to LRCI. apparently never filed at the courthouse. Texas Brine is very eager get this cleared up. Do you know whether Legal has Thanks your help, Rakhi I've got an idea. Ted and you clean up? I'll to at humble Jacqueline Kelly <JKelly@FairIsaac.com> 11/09/2000 PM To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com> cc:

 I would ask that you work with GErald Nemec Of the eWS LegAl DepaRtmeNt.  He's been oversEEing The Napoleonville work anD will Be ABle tO OvErsee And work WItH kEitH DAiGle AnD roGer WeStbRook on tHe Crawfish rigHt-Of -Way work.

I haVE rEcently joiNed The Enron InduStrIal MarKeTs lEGal teAm aNd am dIvestiNG of all My former GAs aSsets aND TradinG WOrK.  GerAld can be reached at 3-3512.

tHaNKs,

Steve

 -----OriginaL MessaGe-----
fRoM: 	iSraNi, RAkhi
Sent:	FrIdAy, AugUSt 24, 2001 9:44 AM
To:	VAN HOOSEr, STEve
Cc:	Johnson, PAtrick
SubjeCT:	StAtus UpDaTes

sTeve,

I wAs hopInG You Could help me With The followIng two ISsues.  I aM Not sure Who in lEgaL is WorkINg On TheSe.

1) cRawFIsH RiGHt-oF-Ways (couNtErParty:  bridGELINe) - BrIdgElinE is reQuesting ROWs/eAseMentS On tHe CraWfish Land In lA.  KeiTh DaigLe, I suPpOse, is the one who wOuld Be actuallY drAfTinG tHe agrEEments.  rogEr WEstbrooK recentLY reCeIVED tHe plats and general dEsCRIpTions whiCh are tO Be AtTAched to tHe AgrEemeNTS.  WoulD you KNoW the statUs on thESe DoCuments?

2) naPoleonViLle (CouNterpARty: TExas BrIne) - Texas brine PUrchase approxiMAtely 16.6 acres froM enRON aT The NApoLeonville SaLt DoME earLier THiS yeAR.  TexaS BrinE iS AtTEmpting to clear title FoR this lAnd.  ThE executed docuMents from tHE SAle of the Land FRoM enron Storage Co To BriDgeline StoRAge Co and Then fRom BridgEline StorAGE Co to LRCi.  weRe aPpaRenTLY nEver filed at thE COurtHoUse.  TexaS BrIne is veRy eAgeR to Get ThIs cleared Up.  Do you kNoW wHeThEr LEgal hAS these doCuMenTs?

thaNks foR Your heLp,

RakHi
(x-37871) I'Ve GoT An iDea.  HowzABoUT ted cOoKs And yOu cLeAn up?  SErioUSly, Though,
I'Ll try to hoSt nEXt tiMe At My humblE apartment.

	JacQuEline Kelly <jKEllY@FairISAAc.com>
	11/09/2000 01:31 PM

		 TO: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <JeFF.DasoviCh@eNron.cOm>
		 cc:

 I would ask that you work  with Gera ld Ne mec  of  t he E WS l egal departmen t .  H e's been overseeing th e Nap ol e onvi l le  work  and wi l lb e  ab le  t o o ve r se e and  wo rk with  Keith Dai gle  a nd Roger Wes t br ook on the  Cr awfish Right -of  -Waywo rk.
I ha verecen tly jo i ned th e Enron I nd u strial Markets l eg al t eam and am divest i ng of all my form er Gas  A s se t s  an d T rading wor k.   Ger a ld canb er e a che d  at 3-3512.
Thanks,

St e ve
 ---- -O rig i nal Me ssage -- - --From: 	Isra ni,Rakhi
S ent:	F r iday, A u gust 24 , 2001  9: 44AM
T o :Va n H oo s er, St eve Cc: 	Johnson ,Pa trick
Sub j e c t :	St atu s Up dates

Steve,

I w ashopi n g y ou co uld h elpme  with  the f ollow in g two issues. I am  not sure  wh oinle gal i s  worki ngonthese.

1) C r awf is h R ig ht-of-Ways (counte rp a r ty :  Bridg eline) -Br i dgelineis  re ques t i ng RO Ws/e a se ments on  the C r aw fi sh land  i n LA. K eit h D aigle ,  I s uppose , is the  onew ho would be ac t ually draftin g  t h e  a g reem ent s.  Roger W estb r ookrece n tl y r e ceive d the  p l at s  and general descri pt ions w hichare to be att ached to t h e agreemen ts.Wo u ld you know th e sta tus on the s e docume nts?

2)Napoleonv i l le (coun ter par ty:  Te x a sBrine) - Texa s Brin epurchas e a pproxim ate ly16. 6 a cr es from E nron atth eNa po leo nvill e  Salt Do me  ea rl ier  this year. Texa s Br in ei s a ttempti n gt o  cle ar  t itle  fo rthisland .   T he exec uted docu men t s fr om  t he sale  of the landfr om Enron S to rag e Co t o Bridgeli ne Storage Co and thenf rom Bri dge lineStor age Co to  LR CI.  w ere appare ntly n everfi led a t the c ou rth ou se.  Texas B rin e isve ry e ager to  get this clearedu p. Do you knowwhe ther L eg alh as the se doc u m ents?

Than ks for you rh el p,

Rakhi( x-3 78 71) I'v e got a n ide a .  Howz about Ted  cooks an dyouc l ean  up?  Seri ously, t hough,
I ' ll tr y  t o hos t n ext ti me  at  my h umblea par tment .

Ja cqueli ne Ke ll y <JKell y@FairIsaac.com>
	11/09 /200001:31  PM

		 T o:" 'Je ff.Dasovi ch@e nron.com'"  <J eff .Daso vic h @enro n.co m >		c c:

 I_would ask_that you work with_Gerald Nemec_of_the EWS_legal_department.  He's_been overseeing the_Napoleonville work and will_be able to_oversee_and work with Keith Daigle and Roger Westbrook on the Crawfish Right-of -Way work.

I_have_recently joined_the_Enron_Industrial Markets legal team and_am divesting of all my_former Gas_Assets and Trading work.  Gerald can be_reached_at 3-3512.

Thanks,

Steve

 -----Original_Message-----
From: 	Israni, Rakhi
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:44_AM
To:	Van Hooser, Steve
Cc:	Johnson, Patrick
Subject:	Status Updates

Steve,

I was_hoping you could_help_me_with the following two_issues.  I am not sure_who in legal is working on_these.

1) Crawfish Right-of-Ways (counterparty: _Bridgeline) - Bridgeline is requesting ROWs/easements_on the Crawfish land in_LA. _Keith Daigle, I suppose, is_the one who_would be_actually drafting the_agreements.  Roger Westbrook recently received_the plats and_general descriptions which are to be_attached_to the agreements.__Would_you know_the status on_these_documents? __

2) Napoleonville (counterparty: Texas Brine)_-_Texas Brine purchase approximately 16.6 acres from_Enron at the Napoleonville_Salt_Dome earlier this year._ Texas Brine is attempting_to clear title for this land._ The_executed documents_from the sale of the land from Enron Storage Co to_Bridgeline Storage Co and then from_Bridgeline Storage Co to_LRCI. _were_apparently never filed_at_the courthouse._ Texas Brine is very eager to_get this_cleared up.  Do you know_whether Legal has these_documents?_

Thanks for your_help,

Rakhi
(x-37871) I've got an idea. _Howzabout Ted cooks and you_clean_up?_ Seriously, though,
I'll try_to host next time at my_humble apartment.

	Jacqueline Kelly_<JKelly@FairIsaac.com>
	11/09/2000 01:31 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		_cc:_