Repository: drevops/behat-steps
Pull request #400: Added CheckboxTrait.
Author: login: skipper-vp
Labels: name: Needs review
description: Pull request needs a review from assigned developers
Created: 2025-05-13T10:29:17Z | Merged: 2025-05-14T02:23:22Z

Added CheckboxTrait.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
  - Added steps to check and uncheck checkboxes by label or selector in automated test scenarios.
- **Bug Fixes**
  - Improved accuracy in CSS color representation for UI elements.
- **Tests**
  - Introduced new test scenarios to verify checkbox interactions and states.
- **Documentation**
  - Updated documentation to include examples for new checkbox interaction steps.
- **Style**
  - Minor formatting adjustments in HTML and JavaScript for consistency.
- **Chores**
  - Reorganized import statements for improved code clarity.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->


Diff:
diff --git a/STEPS.md b/STEPS.md
index 0bd71999..d9e5c7b5 100644
--- a/STEPS.md
+++ b/STEPS.md
@@ -511,6 +511,36 @@ When I fill in the WYSIWYG field "edit-body-0-value" with the "<p>This is a <str
 
 </details>
 
+<details>
+  <summary><code>@When I check the checkbox :selector</code></summary>
+
+<br/>
+Check the checkbox
+<br/><br/>
+
+```gherkin
+When I check the checkbox "Checkbox label"
+When I check the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
+
+```
+
+</details>
+
+<details>
+  <summary><code>@When I uncheck the checkbox :selector</code></summary>
+
+<br/>
+Uncheck the checkbox
+<br/><br/>
+
+```gherkin
+When I uncheck the checkbox "Checkbox label"
+When I uncheck the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
+
+```
+
+</details>
+
 <details>
   <summary><code>@Then the field :name should exist</code></summary>
 
diff --git a/src/FieldTrait.php b/src/FieldTrait.php
index e9cc6025..b1c63217 100644
--- a/src/FieldTrait.php
+++ b/src/FieldTrait.php
@@ -310,6 +310,44 @@ public function fieldAssertSelectOptionNotSelected(string $value, string $select
     }
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Check the checkbox.
+   *
+   * @param string $selector
+   *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
+   *
+   * @code
+   *   When I check the checkbox "Checkbox label"
+   *   When I check the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
+   * @endcode
+   *
+   * @When I check the checkbox :selector
+   */
+  public function fieldCheckboxCheck(string $selector): void {
+    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
+
+    $this->getSession()->getPage()->checkField($selector);
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Uncheck the checkbox.
+   *
+   * @param string $selector
+   *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
+   *
+   * @code
+   *   When I uncheck the checkbox "Checkbox label"
+   *   When I uncheck the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
+   * @endcode
+   *
+   * @When I uncheck the checkbox :selector
+   */
+  public function fieldCheckboxUncheck(string $selector): void {
+    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
+
+    $this->getSession()->getPage()->uncheckField($selector);
+  }
+
   /**
    * Return fixed step argument (with \" replaced back to ").
    */
diff --git a/tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php b/tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php
index 000995f4..879e987a 100644
--- a/tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php
+++ b/tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php
@@ -7,34 +7,34 @@
 
 declare(strict_types=1);
 
+use DrevOps\BehatSteps\CookieTrait;
+use DrevOps\BehatSteps\DateTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\BigPipeTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\BlockTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\ContentBlockTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\ContentTrait;
-use DrevOps\BehatSteps\CookieTrait;
-use DrevOps\BehatSteps\DateTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\DraggableviewsTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\EckTrait;
-use DrevOps\BehatSteps\ElementTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\EmailTrait;
-use DrevOps\BehatSteps\FieldTrait;
-use DrevOps\BehatSteps\FileDownloadTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\FileTrait;
-use DrevOps\BehatSteps\KeyboardTrait;
-use DrevOps\BehatSteps\LinkTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\MediaTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\MenuTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\MetatagTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\OverrideTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\ParagraphsTrait;
-use DrevOps\BehatSteps\PathTrait;
-use DrevOps\BehatSteps\ResponseTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\SearchApiTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\TaxonomyTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\TestmodeTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\UserTrait;
-use DrevOps\BehatSteps\WaitTrait;
 use DrevOps\BehatSteps\Drupal\WatchdogTrait;
+use DrevOps\BehatSteps\ElementTrait;
+use DrevOps\BehatSteps\FieldTrait;
+use DrevOps\BehatSteps\FileDownloadTrait;
+use DrevOps\BehatSteps\KeyboardTrait;
+use DrevOps\BehatSteps\LinkTrait;
+use DrevOps\BehatSteps\PathTrait;
+use DrevOps\BehatSteps\ResponseTrait;
+use DrevOps\BehatSteps\WaitTrait;
 use Drupal\DrupalExtension\Context\DrupalContext;
 
 /**
diff --git a/tests/behat/features/field.feature b/tests/behat/features/field.feature
index 0666e608..90996d05 100644
--- a/tests/behat/features/field.feature
+++ b/tests/behat/features/field.feature
@@ -319,3 +319,18 @@ Feature: Check that FieldTrait works
       """
       The select "non_existent_select" was not found on the page /admin/config/regional/settings
       """
+
+  @phpserver
+  Scenario: Assert that checkboxes are checked and unchecked
+    Given I am on the phpserver test page
+    Then the field "Checkbox unchecked" should exist
+    And the field "Checkbox checked" should exist
+
+    And the checkbox "Checkbox unchecked" should not be checked
+    And the checkbox "Checkbox checked" should be checked
+
+    When I check the checkbox "Checkbox unchecked"
+    Then the checkbox "Checkbox unchecked" should be checked
+
+    When I check the checkbox "Checkbox checked"
+    Then the checkbox "Checkbox checked" should be checked
diff --git a/tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html b/tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html
index 70b6e468..092223ce 100644
--- a/tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html
+++ b/tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@
     #log {
       position: fixed;
       padding: 20px;
-      background: #ccc;
+      background: #cccccc;
       top: 0;
       right: 0;
     }
@@ -377,8 +377,14 @@
     inner Main content
     <div id="main-inner-custom">
       inner Main content custom
-      <input type="text" name="input1" id="input1" />
-      <input type="text" name="input2" id="input2" />
+      <form action="">
+        <input type="text" name="input1" id="input1"/>
+        <input type="text" name="input2" id="input2"/>
+        <input type="checkbox" name="input3" id="input3" value="Checkbox unchecked"/>
+        <label for="input3">Checkbox unchecked</label>
+        <input type="checkbox" name="input4" id="input4" value="Checkbox checked" checked/>
+        <label for="input4">Checkbox checked</label>
+      </form>
     </div>
   </div>
 </div>
@@ -499,7 +505,7 @@
 
 <button id="trigger-confirm" onclick="testConfirm()">Test confirm</button>
 <div>
-  <input type="color" id="edit-color-input" name="color_input" value="#000000" />
+  <input type="color" id="edit-color-input" name="color_input" value="#000000"/>
   <label for="edit-color-input">Color</label>
 </div>
 
@@ -508,7 +514,8 @@
     let text = "Press a button!\nEither OK or Cancel.";
     if (confirm(text) === true) {
       text = "You pressed OK!";
-    } else {
+    }
+    else {
       text = "You canceled!";
     }
     document.getElementById("trigger-confirm").innerHTML = text;


Reviews:
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: **Actionable comments posted: 2**

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
**Plan: Pro**

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4eb70f2800614a07c70a07c0de49d4ddd634f299 and 31a73dcaff3e80d0a764748c98108410bfd65474.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (6)</summary>

* `README.md` (4 hunks)
* `STEPS.md` (2 hunks)
* `src/CheckboxTrait.php` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php` (2 hunks)
* `tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html` (1 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary>

<details>
<summary>README.md</summary>

98-98: Inline HTML
Element: details

(MD033, no-inline-html)

</details>
<details>
<summary>STEPS.md</summary>

49-49: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)

---

50-50: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)

---

50-50: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)

---

50-50: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null

(MD032, blanks-around-lists)

---

51-51: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)

---

51-51: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)

---

53-53: Multiple consecutive blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 2

(MD012, no-multiple-blanks)

---

54-54: Inline HTML
Element: details

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

55-55: Inline HTML
Element: summary

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

55-55: Inline HTML
Element: code

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

57-57: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

59-59: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

59-59: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

68-68: Inline HTML
Element: details

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

69-69: Inline HTML
Element: summary

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

69-69: Inline HTML
Element: code

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

71-71: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

73-73: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

73-73: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

</details>

</details>

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (13)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2)</summary>

`12-12`: **LGTM - New trait import is properly added.**

The import statement for the new CheckboxTrait is correctly added and follows the alphabetical ordering of imports.

---

`48-48`: **LGTM - Trait use statement added correctly.**

The CheckboxTrait is properly integrated into the FeatureContext class.

</details>
<details>
<summary>README.md (1)</summary>

`46-46`: **LGTM - Documentation properly updated.**

The CheckboxTrait is correctly added to the "Index of Generic steps" table with an appropriate description. The entry maintains the table's alphabetical order and formatting.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (1)</summary>

`1-48`: **LGTM - Well-structured test coverage for the new CheckboxTrait.**

The feature file provides excellent test coverage for the new CheckboxTrait:
- Tests both checking and unchecking actions
- Verifies idempotent behavior (ensuring an already checked box is checked doesn't change state)
- Includes negative test cases (marked as skipped) to verify proper error handling

The scenarios are clear, well-organized, and adequately test the functionality.

</details>
<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (4)</summary>

`7-7`: **Good index addition consistent with other traits!**

The CheckboxTrait is properly added to the index table with a clear and concise description matching the style of other traits.

---

`45-52`: **Well structured trait documentation with clear purpose**

The documentation header for the CheckboxTrait follows the established format with source link, example reference, and a clear description of the trait's purpose and benefits.

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary>

49-49: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)

---

50-50: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)

---

50-50: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)

---

50-50: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null

(MD032, blanks-around-lists)

---

51-51: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)

---

51-51: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)

</details>

</details>

---

`54-66`: **First step definition is well documented**

The documentation for the "ensure the box is checked" step provides clear usage instructions with a good example that follows the pattern of other traits in this file.

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary>

54-54: Inline HTML
Element: details

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

55-55: Inline HTML
Element: summary

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

55-55: Inline HTML
Element: code

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

57-57: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

59-59: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

59-59: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

</details>

</details>

---

`68-80`: **Second step definition is well documented**

The documentation for the "ensure the box is unchecked" step provides clear usage instructions with a good example that follows the pattern of other traits in this file.

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary>

68-68: Inline HTML
Element: details

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

69-69: Inline HTML
Element: summary

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

69-69: Inline HTML
Element: code

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

71-71: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

73-73: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

---

73-73: Inline HTML
Element: br

(MD033, no-inline-html)

</details>

</details>

</details>
<details>
<summary>src/CheckboxTrait.php (5)</summary>

`1-12`: **Proper structure and documentation**

The trait follows best practices with appropriate declarations:
- Strict types enabled
- Proper namespace
- Comprehensive class-level documentation that explains the trait's purpose

The code adheres to the project's coding standards.

---

`13-27`: **Well documented method with clear Behat annotation**

The first method has excellent documentation:
- Clear description of what the method does
- Explanation of when to use it
- Code example with proper formatting
- Behat annotation for step definition

---

`28-39`: **First method implementation is clean and handles errors properly**

The implementation:
- Finds the checkbox by label
- Includes proper error handling when the checkbox isn't found
- Efficiently only checks the checkbox if it's not already checked

This is a good implementation of conditional checkbox toggling.

---

`41-53`: **Well documented second method**

Similar to the first method, this has excellent documentation that clearly explains the purpose and usage.

---

`54-65`: **Second method implementation is clean and handles errors properly**

The implementation follows the same pattern as the first method with appropriate error handling and conditional logic.

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
state: COMMENTED
author_association: NONE
submitted_at: 2025-05-13T10:30:42Z
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: **Actionable comments posted: 2**

<details>
<summary>🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>README.md (1)</summary><blockquote>

`98-214`: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Optional: Consider relocating the AI migration prompt.**  
This `<details>` block adds extensive AI-driven migration instructions that may clutter the primary README. Consider moving it to `MIGRATION.md` or another dedicated document and linking to it for cleaner top-level documentation.

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>♻️ Duplicate comments (1)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>src/CheckboxTrait.php (1)</summary><blockquote>

`29-36`: **Good implementation of the helper method to reduce duplication.**

The `findCheckboxByLabel` helper method effectively addresses the previous review comment about code duplication. This improves maintainability by centralizing the checkbox lookup logic.

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
**Plan: Lite**

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 31a73dcaff3e80d0a764748c98108410bfd65474 and b01615b8b571db0cf92c1dbc37bba6d3456eee79.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (6)</summary>

* `README.md` (4 hunks)
* `STEPS.md` (2 hunks)
* `src/CheckboxTrait.php` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php` (2 hunks)
* `tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html` (1 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (10)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (1)</summary>

`382-383`: **Fixture update is correct.**  
The new checkbox markup has matching `name` and `id` and a corresponding `<label>` for accessibility.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2)</summary>

`10-13`: **Correct import of `CheckboxTrait`.**  
The trait is imported and placed in alphabetical order with other traits.

---

`45-49`: **Correct use of `CheckboxTrait` in the class.**  
The trait is added and alphabetically sorted among the other trait inclusions.

</details>
<details>
<summary>README.md (1)</summary>

`46-46`: **Added `CheckboxTrait` to the steps index.**  
The new entry correctly links to `STEPS.md#checkboxtrait` and follows the table format.

</details>
<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (1)</summary>

`7-7`: **Added `CheckboxTrait` to the generic steps index.**  
The new table entry correctly follows the existing format and links to the checkbox documentation anchor.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (4)</summary>

`1-5`: **Feature description is clear.**  
The feature summary and intent are well-defined.

---

`21-34`: **Negative scenario for checking a non-existent checkbox is appropriate.**  
The skipped scenario correctly tests the failure message when the checkbox label is not found.

---

`35-48`: **Negative scenario for unchecking a non-existent checkbox is appropriate.**  
The skipped scenario correctly tests the failure message when the checkbox label is not found.

---

`6-20`: <details>
<summary>❓ Verification inconclusive</summary>

**Inconsistent tagging and verify assertion step definitions.**  
The positive scenario uses `@checkboxtrait` instead of the `@trait:CheckboxTrait` convention used in the negative scenarios—consider unifying tags for consistency. Also ensure that the assertion steps  
```
Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
```  
are implemented in the trait.  
  
Run the following script to verify the assertion step definitions exist in `src/CheckboxTrait.php`:

---

🏁 Script executed:

```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that assertion steps for checkbox state exist in the trait implementation.
rg -n "@Then.*checkbox" src/CheckboxTrait.php
```

Length of output: 47

---

```bash
#!/bin/bash
# Locate CheckboxTrait.php and verify assertion step annotations
echo "Locating CheckboxTrait.php..."
find . -type f -iname 'CheckboxTrait.php' | while read -r file; do
  echo "→ Found: $file"
  echo "Checking for @Then annotations in $file..."
  rg -n '@Then' "$file" || echo "✗ No @Then annotations found in $file"
done
```

---

```bash
#!/bin/bash
# Locate the CheckboxTrait file
file=$(find . -type f -iname 'CheckboxTrait.php' | head -n1)
if [ -z "$file" ]; then
  echo "✗ CheckboxTrait.php not found"
else
  echo "→ Found $file"
  echo "Searching for @Then annotations in $file"
  rg -n "@Then" "$file" || echo "✗ No @Then annotations found in $file"
fi
```

---



</details>

**Unify tagging and verify checkbox assertion steps**  
Please update the feature and ensure your trait implements the necessary step definitions:

- In tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature, replace every `@checkboxtrait` tag with `@trait:CheckboxTrait` for consistency.  
- Confirm that your `CheckboxTrait.php` (e.g. in src/ or features/bootstrap/) defines these steps, for example:  
  - `@Then /^the "(.*)" checkbox should be checked$/`  
  - `@Then /^the "(.*)" checkbox should not be checked$/`  

If those methods or annotations are missing, please add them to the trait so the assertions will work.

</details>
<details>
<summary>src/CheckboxTrait.php (1)</summary>

`1-80`: **Well-implemented trait with clean, reusable code.**

This trait is well-structured with proper documentation, good error handling, and follows best practices. I especially like the conditional logic that only toggles checkbox state when necessary, improving test efficiency.

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
state: COMMENTED
author_association: NONE
submitted_at: 2025-05-13T10:50:47Z
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: **Actionable comments posted: 1**

<details>
<summary>🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>README.md (1)</summary><blockquote>

`98-216`: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Consider relocating the AI migration prompt**  
The large `<details>` block for the AI-guided migration prompt may clutter the main README. You could move it to a dedicated MIGRATION.md or append it to CONTRIBUTING.md for better separation of concerns.

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>♻️ Duplicate comments (3)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (1)</summary><blockquote>

`45-52`: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Standardize bullet phrasing for consistency**  
The bullets under the `CheckboxTrait` section mix imperative (`Ensure`) and descriptive (`Provides`). Consider using parallel phrasing, e.g.:  
```diff
- >  - Provides intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation.
+ >  - Provide intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation.
```

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (1)</summary><blockquote>

`35-48`: **Duplicate of previous tagging suggestion**  
Please see the comment on lines 21–34 regarding consistent tag usage between positive and negative scenarios.

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>src/CheckboxTrait.php (1)</summary><blockquote>

`32-34`: **Consider enhancing error message with more context.**

While the error message is clear, it could be more helpful for debugging by including the current page URL or title.

```diff
if (!$checkbox) {
-  throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label));
+  throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page "%s".', $label, $this->getSession()->getCurrentUrl()));
}
```

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
**Plan: Lite**

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4eb70f2800614a07c70a07c0de49d4ddd634f299 and b01615b8b571db0cf92c1dbc37bba6d3456eee79.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (6)</summary>

* `README.md` (4 hunks)
* `STEPS.md` (2 hunks)
* `src/CheckboxTrait.php` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php` (2 hunks)
* `tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html` (1 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (10)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (1)</summary>

`382-383`: **Fixture updated correctly**  
The new checkbox input and its `<label>` are properly added within the container, with matching `id` and `name` attributes and a correct `for` reference.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2)</summary>

`12-12`: **Import of `CheckboxTrait` is correct**  
The new `use DrevOps\BehatSteps\CheckboxTrait;` import aligns with the namespace conventions of other traits.

---

`48-48`: **Trait inclusion in context class is correct**  
Using `CheckboxTrait` within `FeatureContext` enables the new step definitions as expected.

</details>
<details>
<summary>README.md (1)</summary>

`46-46`: **Documented `CheckboxTrait` in index**  
The README now lists `CheckboxTrait` with a description and correct link to `STEPS.md`.

</details>
<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (1)</summary>

`7-7`: **Added index entry for `CheckboxTrait`**  
The generic steps index now correctly references the new `CheckboxTrait`.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (1)</summary>

`1-20`: **Main scenario covers state toggling thoroughly**  
The “Assert ensure checkbox is checked/unchecked” scenario exercises both initial and idempotent state changes. Gherkin syntax and tags align with conventions.

</details>
<details>
<summary>src/CheckboxTrait.php (4)</summary>

`29-36`: **Great job extracting the common checkbox lookup into a helper method!**

The helper method effectively reduces duplication between the two public methods and follows good software engineering practices. The method signature, documentation, and implementation are clear and appropriate.

---

`38-57`: **Well-documented method with clear purpose and example usage**

The `checkboxEnsureIsChecked` method has comprehensive documentation that clearly explains its purpose, when to use it, and includes a practical usage example. The implementation correctly only checks the box if it's not already checked, preventing unnecessary actions.

---

`59-78`: **Well-documented method with clear purpose and example usage**

The `checkboxEnsureIsUnchecked` method is similarly well-documented with a clear explanation and example. The implementation correctly only unchecks the box if it's already checked, preventing unnecessary actions.

---

`1-80`: **Overall excellent implementation of the CheckboxTrait**

The trait is well-structured, follows PHP best practices, and provides useful functionality for Behat tests. The code is clean, well-documented, and the methods have a single, clear responsibility. The trait will be valuable for creating more readable and maintainable Behat step definitions.

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
state: COMMENTED
author_association: NONE
submitted_at: 2025-05-13T10:57:08Z
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: **Actionable comments posted: 2**

<details>
<summary>🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>README.md (1)</summary><blockquote>

`98-215`: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Reevaluate large AI migration prompt block**  
This extensive `<details>` section may overwhelm the README. Consider moving the AI migration prompt to a dedicated `MIGRATION.md` or external guide to keep the primary README concise, linking to full instructions instead.

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>♻️ Duplicate comments (4)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (1)</summary><blockquote>

`45-52`: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Align bullet tense for uniformity**  
The second bullet uses “Provides intuitive steps…”, while other trait docs use imperative verbs. Consider changing it to “Provide intuitive steps…” for consistency.

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (2)</summary><blockquote>

`35-48`: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Use consistent scenario tagging**  
Apply the same tag consistency to this second negative scenario. Consider unifying tags to match the positive and first negative scenarios.

---

`21-34`: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Use consistent scenario tagging**  
This negative scenario uses `@trait:CheckboxTrait`, but the positive scenario does not. Consider adopting a uniform tag convention (e.g., always `@checkboxtrait`) across all related scenarios.

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>src/CheckboxTrait.php (1)</summary><blockquote>

`32-34`: **Consider enhancing error message with more context.**

While the error message is clear, it could be more helpful for debugging by including the current page URL or title.


```diff
  if (!$checkbox) {
-    throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label));
+    throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page "%s".', $label, $this->getSession()->getCurrentUrl()));
  }
```

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
**Plan: Lite**

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b01615b8b571db0cf92c1dbc37bba6d3456eee79 and d73a1b098c618e51a3a510511d94e04d57cafa5c.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (6)</summary>

* `README.md` (4 hunks)
* `STEPS.md` (2 hunks)
* `src/CheckboxTrait.php` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php` (2 hunks)
* `tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html` (1 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (8)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (1)</summary>

`382-383`: **Approve fixture addition for checkbox**  
The new checkbox input and its corresponding label are correctly added with matching `name` and `id` attributes, enabling the `CheckboxTrait` tests to locate the element.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2)</summary>

`12-12`: **Integrate CheckboxTrait import**  
Correctly imports the generic `CheckboxTrait` alongside other traits.

---

`48-48`: **Include CheckboxTrait in FeatureContext**  
The trait is properly applied to enable the new checkbox step definitions.

</details>
<details>
<summary>README.md (1)</summary>

`46-46`: **Document CheckboxTrait in README index**  
The entry for `CheckboxTrait` is clear and aligns with other generic traits.

</details>
<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (1)</summary>

`7-7`: **Add CheckboxTrait to generic steps index**  
The index entry correctly links to the new trait documentation.

</details>
<details>
<summary>src/CheckboxTrait.php (3)</summary>

`1-80`: **Overall well-organized and functional trait for checkbox handling**

This new trait is well-structured with clear documentation and a good separation of concerns. I appreciate the conditional toggle that only changes state when needed and the extracted helper method that reduces duplication.

---

`38-57`: **Excellent conditional checkbox handling implementation**

The method correctly ensures a checkbox is checked without changing its state if it's already checked. The documentation is clear with a good example and the Gherkin annotation is properly formatted.

---

`59-78`: **Well-implemented checkbox unchecking functionality**

This method mirrors the checking method with consistent documentation style and implementation. Good job ensuring symmetry between the two methods.

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
state: COMMENTED
author_association: NONE
submitted_at: 2025-05-13T11:09:14Z
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: **Actionable comments posted: 2**

<details>
<summary>🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (1)</summary><blockquote>

`52-79`: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Refine negative scenario names and setup**  
The two negative scenarios are very verbose and use a placeholder step (`Given some behat configuration`). Consider:
- Shortening the scenario titles to something like `Fail when ensuring non-existent checkbox is checked` and `Fail when ensuring non-existent checkbox is unchecked`.  
- Replacing the generic `Given some behat configuration` with the actual initial context steps (e.g., `Given I am on the phpserver test page`) to make the scenario self-contained.

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>♻️ Duplicate comments (3)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (1)</summary><blockquote>

`45-52`: **Align bullet tense for consistency**  
In the `CheckboxTrait` section, the bullets use mixed imperative and descriptive forms:

```diff
- >  - Provides intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation.
+ >  - Provide intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation.
```

Updating this will match the imperative style used elsewhere.

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>src/CheckboxTrait.php (2)</summary><blockquote>

`17-28`: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Remove trailing period for consistency in docblock**

The parameter docblock ends with a period while other docblocks in this file don't have trailing periods. Consider removing it for consistency.



```diff
 * @param string $label
-   *   The checkbox label.
+   *   The checkbox label
```

---

`29-36`: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Consider enhancing error message with more context.**

While the error message is clear, it could be more helpful for debugging by including the current page URL or title.



```diff
  if (!$checkbox) {
-    throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label));
+    throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page "%s".', $label, $this->getSession()->getCurrentUrl()));
  }
```

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
**Plan: Lite**

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d73a1b098c618e51a3a510511d94e04d57cafa5c and 3db943f8b51eae814b5e33db1ab6ac2848c12a27.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (6)</summary>

* `README.md` (4 hunks)
* `STEPS.md` (2 hunks)
* `src/CheckboxTrait.php` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php` (2 hunks)
* `tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html` (1 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (9)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (1)</summary>

`382-383`: **Fixture update – checkbox input added**  
The new `<input type="checkbox">` and corresponding `<label>` are correctly inserted with matching `id` and `for` attributes, ensuring accessibility and aligning with the trait’s test scenarios.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2)</summary>

`12-12`: **Import `CheckboxTrait` in the proper namespace**  
The import `use DrevOps\BehatSteps\CheckboxTrait;` correctly matches the trait’s location in `src/`.

---

`48-48`: **Enable `CheckboxTrait` in `FeatureContext`**  
Adding `use CheckboxTrait;` integrates the new steps into the Behat context, allowing the trait’s methods to be available.

</details>
<details>
<summary>README.md (1)</summary>

`46-46`: **Document new `CheckboxTrait` index entry**  
The README now lists `CheckboxTrait` in the generic steps table with a clear description.

</details>
<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (1)</summary>

`7-7`: **Index entry for `CheckboxTrait`**  
The generic steps index now correctly references the new trait.

</details>
<details>
<summary>src/CheckboxTrait.php (4)</summary>

`1-15`: **Well-structured trait declaration and documentation.**

The trait is properly declared with namespace, imports, and comprehensive PHPDoc that clearly explains its purpose and functionality.

---

`38-57`: **Well-implemented checkbox checking functionality with clear documentation.**

The method is well documented with helpful examples and properly implements the logic to only check the box if it's currently unchecked. Good use of the extracted helper method.

---

`59-79`: **Well-implemented checkbox unchecking functionality with clear documentation.**

The method is well documented with helpful examples and properly implements the logic to only uncheck the box if it's currently checked. Good use of the extracted helper method.

---

`80-81`: **The trait implementation is complete and well-structured.**

The trait provides a cohesive set of methods for checkbox interaction in Behat tests, following good practices for code organization and documentation.

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
state: COMMENTED
author_association: NONE
submitted_at: 2025-05-13T11:37:07Z
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: **Actionable comments posted: 6**

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
**Plan: Lite**

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3db943f8b51eae814b5e33db1ab6ac2848c12a27 and 82146396a64be73ed675fb49170574203195d650.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (5)</summary>

* `STEPS.md` (1 hunks)
* `src/FieldTrait.php` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/features/field.feature` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html` (4 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (6)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (2)</summary>

`342-342`: **Expanded hex color code for consistency.**

The CSS background color for the `#log` element was changed from shorthand `#ccc` to the full hexadecimal `#cccccc`, providing more consistent formatting across the codebase.

---

`380-387`: **Added checkbox inputs and labels for testing the new checkbox trait functionality.**

A form element with text inputs and labeled checkboxes was added to support the new checkbox-related Behat steps. One checkbox is initially unchecked and one is checked, providing test cases for both states.

</details>
<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (1)</summary>

`514-542`: **Well-documented checkbox interaction steps.**

The new step definitions for checking and unchecking checkboxes are clearly documented with proper formatting and examples. These steps align with the newly implemented checkbox functionality in the FieldTrait.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (1)</summary>

`10-12`: **Reorganized trait imports for better structure.**

The import statements were reorganized to group related traits together. `CookieTrait` and `DateTrait` imports were moved earlier, while several other traits were moved after `WatchdogTrait`. This improves code organization while maintaining all necessary functionality.



Also applies to: 30-37

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/features/field.feature (1)</summary>

`323-336`: **Added comprehensive test scenario for checkbox functionality.**

A new scenario was added to test the checkbox interaction functionality, verifying:
1. Existence of checkboxes
2. Initial checked/unchecked state verification
3. Checking a checkbox and confirming the state change
4. Re-checking an already checked checkbox to ensure idempotent behavior

This provides good test coverage for the new checkbox-related steps.

</details>
<details>
<summary>src/FieldTrait.php (1)</summary>

`313-349`: **Note about PR title vs. implementation**

The PR is titled "Added CheckboxTrait" but the functionality has been added to the existing `FieldTrait` instead. This seems appropriate since the methods are related to field manipulation, but you might want to update the PR title to reflect the actual changes.

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
state: COMMENTED
author_association: NONE
submitted_at: 2025-05-14T02:09:49Z
user: login: AlexSkrypnyk
state: APPROVED
author_association: MEMBER
submitted_at: 2025-05-14T02:13:50Z

Review comments:
diff_hunk: @@ -379,6 +379,8 @@
       inner Main content custom
       <input type="text" name="input1" id="input1" />
       <input type="text" name="input2" id="input2" />
+      <input type="checkbox" name="input2" id="input3" value="Test checkbox" />
+      <label for="input3">Test checkbox</label>
path: tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Consider aligning the checkbox name attribute with its id.**

The new checkbox has `name="input2"` but `id="input3"`. Since there's already another input with `name="input2"` on line 381, this could cause confusion. Consider changing the name attribute to match the id for consistency:

```diff
-<input type="checkbox" name="input2" id="input3" value="Test checkbox" />
+<input type="checkbox" name="input3" id="input3" value="Test checkbox" />
```

This would provide better semantics and avoid potential confusion in form handling.



<!-- suggestion_start -->

<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>

> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

`````suggestion
      <input type="checkbox" name="input3" id="input3" value="Test checkbox" />
      <label for="input3">Test checkbox</label>
`````

</details>

<!-- suggestion_end -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->

✅ Addressed in commit b01615b
created_at: 2025-05-13T10:30:42Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+namespace DrevOps\BehatSteps;
+
+/**
+ * Interact with checkbox form elements.
+ *
+ * - Ensure checkboxes are checked or unchecked regardless of current state.
+ * - Provides intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation.
+ */
+trait CheckboxTrait {
+
+  /**
+   * Check the box only if it's unchecked.
+   *
+   * This step ensures that a checkbox is checked, but doesn't change it if it's
+   * already checked. This is useful for cases where you want to make sure a
+   * checkbox is checked without having to check its current state first.
+   *
+   * @code
+   * Given I ensure the box "Accept terms and conditions" is checked
+   * @endcode
+   *
+   * @Given I ensure the box :label is checked
+   */
+  public function checkboxEnsureIsChecked(string $label): void {
+    $page = $this->getSession()->getPage();
+    $checkbox = $page->findField($label);
+
+    if (!$checkbox) {
+      throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label));
+    }
path: src/CheckboxTrait.php
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Consider extracting the checkbox lookup to reduce duplication**

There's duplicated code for finding and validating the checkbox's existence in both methods. Consider extracting this to a private helper method to improve maintainability.


```diff
 trait CheckboxTrait {
+
+  /**
+   * Find a checkbox by its label and validate it exists.
+   *
+   * @param string $label The checkbox label.
+   *
+   * @return \Behat\Mink\Element\NodeElement The checkbox element.
+   *
+   * @throws \Exception When the checkbox is not found.
+   */
+  private function findCheckboxByLabel(string $label): \Behat\Mink\Element\NodeElement {
+    $page = $this->getSession()->getPage();
+    $checkbox = $page->findField($label);
+
+    if (!$checkbox) {
+      throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label));
+    }
+
+    return $checkbox;
+  }

   public function checkboxEnsureIsChecked(string $label): void {
-    $page = $this->getSession()->getPage();
-    $checkbox = $page->findField($label);
-
-    if (!$checkbox) {
-      throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label));
-    }
+    $checkbox = $this->findCheckboxByLabel($label);

     if (!$checkbox->isChecked()) {
       $checkbox->check();
     }
   }

   public function checkboxEnsureIsUnchecked(string $label): void {
-    $page = $this->getSession()->getPage();
-    $checkbox = $page->findField($label);
-
-    if (!$checkbox) {
-      throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label));
-    }
+    $checkbox = $this->findCheckboxByLabel($label);

     if ($checkbox->isChecked()) {
       $checkbox->uncheck();
     }
   }
```


Also applies to: 58-60

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->

✅ Addressed in commit b01615b
created_at: 2025-05-13T10:30:42Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -41,6 +42,43 @@
 
 ---
 
+## CheckboxTrait
+
+[Source](src/CheckboxTrait.php), [Example](tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature)
+
+>  Interact with checkbox form elements.
+>  - Ensure checkboxes are checked or unchecked regardless of current state.
+>  - Provides intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation.
+
path: STEPS.md
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Documented the `CheckboxTrait` steps.**  
The new section and `<details>` blocks are formatted consistently with other trait sections. Consider aligning the tense of bullet items (e.g., use “Provide intuitive steps…” instead of “Provides…”) for uniformity.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->

✅ Addressed in commits 14d449c to 8214639
created_at: 2025-05-13T10:50:47Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+namespace DrevOps\BehatSteps;
+
+use Behat\Mink\Element\NodeElement;
+
+/**
+ * Interact with checkbox form elements.
+ *
+ * - Ensure checkboxes are checked or unchecked regardless of current state.
+ * - Provides intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation.
+ */
+trait CheckboxTrait {
+
+  /**
+   * Find a checkbox by its label and validate it exists.
+   *
+   * @param string $label
+   *   The checkbox label.
+   *
+   * @return \Behat\Mink\Element\NodeElement
+   *   The checkbox element.
+   *
+   * @throws \Exception
+   *   When the checkbox is not found.
+   */
+  private function findCheckboxByLabel(string $label): NodeElement {
+    $page = $this->getSession()->getPage();
+    $checkbox = $page->findField($label);
+    if (!$checkbox) {
+      throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label));
+    }
path: src/CheckboxTrait.php
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Consider enhancing error message with more context.**

While the error message is clear, it could be more helpful for debugging by including the current page URL or title.

```diff
  if (!$checkbox) {
-    throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label));
+    throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page "%s".', $label, $this->getSession()->getCurrentUrl()));
  }
```


<!-- suggestion_start -->

<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>

> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

`````suggestion
    if (!$checkbox) {
      throw new \Exception(sprintf(
        'The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page "%s".',
        $label,
        $this->getSession()->getCurrentUrl()
      ));
    }
`````

</details>

<!-- suggestion_end -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-13T10:50:47Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+Feature: Check that CheckboxTrait works
+  As Behat Steps library developer
+  I want to provide tools to handle checkbox form elements
+  So that users can efficiently manage checkbox state in their tests
+
+  @javascript @phpserver @checkboxtrait
+  Scenario: Assert ensure checkbox is checked/unchecked functionality
+    Given I am on the phpserver test page
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is unchecked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
+    # Test that it works when checkbox is already in desired state
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is unchecked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+
+  @trait:CheckboxTrait @skipped
+  Scenario: Negative assertion for "Given I ensure the box :label is checked" fails as expected when the checkbox does not exist
+    Given some behat configuration
+    And scenario steps tagged with "@api @javascript @phpserver":
+      """
+      Given I am on the phpserver test page
+      When I ensure the box "Non-existent checkbox" is checked
+      """
+    When I run "behat --no-colors"
+    Then it should fail with an error:
+      """
+      The checkbox with label "Non-existent checkbox" was not found on the page.
+      """
+
path: tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Use consistent scenario tagging**  
Negative scenarios use `@trait:CheckboxTrait`, while the positive scenario is tagged `@checkboxtrait`. For filtering or test runs by tag, consider unifying on one convention (e.g., always use `@checkboxtrait`).

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-13T10:57:06Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+Feature: Check that CheckboxTrait works
+  As Behat Steps library developer
+  I want to provide tools to handle checkbox form elements
+  So that users can efficiently manage checkbox state in their tests
+
+  @javascript @phpserver
+  Scenario: Assert ensure checkbox is checked/unchecked functionality
+    Given I am on the phpserver test page
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is unchecked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
+    # Test that it works when checkbox is already in desired state
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is unchecked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+
path: tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Refine scenario name and tagging**  
The scenario title “Assert ensure checkbox is checked/unchecked functionality” is redundant. Consider renaming to “Ensure checkbox can be checked and unchecked”. Also, tag this scenario with `@trait:CheckboxTrait` or `@checkboxtrait` to align with the negative scenarios for consistent filtering.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-13T11:09:12Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+namespace DrevOps\BehatSteps;
+
+use Behat\Mink\Element\NodeElement;
+
+/**
+ * Interact with checkbox form elements.
+ *
+ * - Ensure checkboxes are checked or unchecked regardless of current state.
+ * - Provides intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation.
+ */
+trait CheckboxTrait {
+
+  /**
+   * Find a checkbox by its label and validate it exists.
+   *
+   * @param string $label
+   *   The checkbox label.
path: src/CheckboxTrait.php
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Remove trailing period for consistency in docblock**

The parameter docblock ends with a period while other docblocks in this file don't have trailing periods. Consider removing it for consistency.


```diff
 * @param string $label
-   *   The checkbox label.
+   *   The checkbox label
```


<!-- suggestion_start -->

<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>

> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

`````suggestion
   * @param string $label
   *   The checkbox label
`````

</details>

<!-- suggestion_end -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-13T11:09:13Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ composer require --dev drevops/behat-steps:^3
 > and clarity. Please refer to the [migration map](MIGRATION.md) to see the
 > changes. An automated migration script is not included, but an AI-guided migration prompt is provided below.
 
-<details> 
+<details>
path: README.md
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Consider relocating the AI migration details**  
The inserted `<details>` block containing the AI-guided migration prompt is comprehensive but may bloat the main README. Consider moving it to `MIGRATION.md` or a separate guide to keep the primary README focused.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-13T11:37:05Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Feature: Check that CheckboxTrait works
+  As Behat Steps library developer
+  I want to provide tools to handle checkbox form elements
+  So that users can efficiently manage checkbox state in their tests
+
+  @javascript @phpserver
+  Scenario: Ensure already checked checkbox remains checked
+    Given I am on the phpserver test page
+    When I check "Test checkbox"
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+
+  @javascript @phpserver
+  Scenario: Ensure already unchecked checkbox remains unchecked
+    Given I am on the phpserver test page
+    When I uncheck "Test checkbox"
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is unchecked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
+
+  @javascript @phpserver
+  Scenario: Ensure can change checkbox from unchecked to checked
+    Given I am on the phpserver test page
+    When I uncheck "Test checkbox"
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+
+  @javascript @phpserver
+  Scenario: Ensure can change checkbox from checked to unchecked
+    Given I am on the phpserver test page
+    When I check "Test checkbox"
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is unchecked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
+
+  @javascript @phpserver
+  Scenario: Multiple ensure operations are idempotent
+    Given I am on the phpserver test page
+    # Multiple checks
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked
+    # Multiple unchecks
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is unchecked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
+    When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is unchecked
+    Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked
+
path: tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Add consistent trait tagging to positive scenarios**  
The positive scenarios only include `@javascript @phpserver`. To enable filtering or grouping by trait and maintain consistency with the negative scenarios, add `@trait:CheckboxTrait` to all positive scenarios’ tag lines.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-13T11:37:05Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -508,7 +514,8 @@
     let text = "Press a button!\nEither OK or Cancel.";
     if (confirm(text) === true) {
       text = "You pressed OK!";
-    } else {
+    }
+    else {
       text = "You canceled!";
path: tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Improved code formatting for the else block.**

The JavaScript function's else statement was reformatted to a multi-line style, improving readability and consistency with coding standards.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->

✅ Addressed in commits 14d449c to 8214639
created_at: 2025-05-14T02:09:48Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -499,7 +505,7 @@
 
 <button id="trigger-confirm" onclick="testConfirm()">Test confirm</button>
 <div>
-  <input type="color" id="edit-color-input" name="color_input" value="#000000" />
+  <input type="color" id="edit-color-input" name="color_input" value="#000000"/>
path: tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Updated color input element formatting.**

The HTML formatting of the color input was adjusted to a more consistent style.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->

✅ Addressed in commits 14d449c to 8214639
created_at: 2025-05-14T02:09:48Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -310,6 +310,44 @@ public function fieldAssertSelectOptionNotSelected(string $value, string $select
     }
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Check the checkbox.
+   *
+   * @param string $selector
+   *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
+   *
+   * @code
+   *   When I check the checkbox "Checkbox label"
+   *   When I check the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
+   * @endcode
+   *
+   * @When I check the checkbox :selector
+   */
+  public function fieldCheckboxCheck(string $selector): void {
+    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
+
+    $this->getSession()->getPage()->checkField($selector);
+  }
path: src/FieldTrait.php
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Consider adding error handling**

The method relies on Mink's error handling if the checkbox cannot be found or checked. For consistency with other methods in the trait, you might want to add explicit error handling.

```diff
  public function fieldCheckboxCheck(string $selector): void {
    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);

-   $this->getSession()->getPage()->checkField($selector);
+   $page = $this->getSession()->getPage();
+   $field = $page->findField($selector);
+   
+   if ($field === NULL) {
+     throw new ElementNotFoundException($this->getSession()->getDriver(), 'form field', 'id|name|label|value', $selector);
+   }
+   
+   $field->check();
  }
```


<!-- suggestion_start -->

<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>

> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

```suggestion
  public function fieldCheckboxCheck(string $selector): void {
    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);

    $page = $this->getSession()->getPage();
    $field = $page->findField($selector);

    if ($field === null) {
      throw new ElementNotFoundException(
        $this->getSession()->getDriver(),
        'form field',
        'id|name|label|value',
        $selector
      );
    }

    $field->check();
  }
```

</details>

<!-- suggestion_end -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-14T02:09:48Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -310,6 +310,44 @@ public function fieldAssertSelectOptionNotSelected(string $value, string $select
     }
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Check the checkbox.
+   *
+   * @param string $selector
+   *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
+   *
+   * @code
+   *   When I check the checkbox "Checkbox label"
+   *   When I check the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
+   * @endcode
+   *
+   * @When I check the checkbox :selector
+   */
+  public function fieldCheckboxCheck(string $selector): void {
+    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
+
+    $this->getSession()->getPage()->checkField($selector);
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Uncheck the checkbox.
+   *
+   * @param string $selector
+   *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
+   *
+   * @code
+   *   When I uncheck the checkbox "Checkbox label"
+   *   When I uncheck the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
+   * @endcode
+   *
+   * @When I uncheck the checkbox :selector
+   */
+  public function fieldCheckboxUncheck(string $selector): void {
+    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
+
+    $this->getSession()->getPage()->uncheckField($selector);
+  }
path: src/FieldTrait.php
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Implementation for checkbox unchecking looks good!**

Like the checkbox checking method, this implementation is clean and follows existing patterns in the trait. It properly normalizes the selector and uses Mink's built-in functionality.

Similarly, consider adding an assertion method to verify that a checkbox is unchecked.


```diff
+ /**
+  * Assert that checkbox is not checked.
+  *
+  * @param string $selector
+  *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
+  *
+  * @code
+  *   Then the checkbox "Checkbox label" should not be checked
+  *   Then the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value" should not be checked
+  * @endcode
+  *
+  * @Then the checkbox :selector should not be checked
+  */
+ public function fieldCheckboxAssertNotChecked(string $selector): void {
+   $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
+   $field = $this->getSession()->getPage()->findField($selector);
+   
+   if ($field === NULL) {
+     throw new ElementNotFoundException($this->getSession()->getDriver(), 'form field', 'id|name|label|value', $selector);
+   }
+   
+   if ($field->isChecked()) {
+     throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox "%s" is checked, but it should not be.', $selector));
+   }
+ }
```

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-14T02:09:49Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -310,6 +310,44 @@ public function fieldAssertSelectOptionNotSelected(string $value, string $select
     }
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Check the checkbox.
+   *
+   * @param string $selector
+   *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
+   *
+   * @code
+   *   When I check the checkbox "Checkbox label"
+   *   When I check the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
+   * @endcode
+   *
+   * @When I check the checkbox :selector
+   */
+  public function fieldCheckboxCheck(string $selector): void {
+    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
+
+    $this->getSession()->getPage()->checkField($selector);
+  }
path: src/FieldTrait.php
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Implementation for checkbox checking looks good!**

The implementation is clean and follows the existing patterns in the trait. It properly normalizes the selector and uses Mink's built-in functionality for checkbox interaction.

One enhancement to consider: you might want to add an assertion method to verify that a checkbox is checked after this operation.


```diff
+ /**
+  * Assert that checkbox is checked.
+  *
+  * @param string $selector
+  *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
+  *
+  * @code
+  *   Then the checkbox "Checkbox label" should be checked
+  *   Then the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value" should be checked
+  * @endcode
+  *
+  * @Then the checkbox :selector should be checked
+  */
+ public function fieldCheckboxAssertChecked(string $selector): void {
+   $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
+   $field = $this->getSession()->getPage()->findField($selector);
+   
+   if ($field === NULL) {
+     throw new ElementNotFoundException($this->getSession()->getDriver(), 'form field', 'id|name|label|value', $selector);
+   }
+   
+   if (!$field->isChecked()) {
+     throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox "%s" is not checked, but it should be.', $selector));
+   }
+ }
```


<!-- suggestion_start -->

<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>

> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

```suggestion
  /**
   * Check the checkbox.
   *
   * @param string $selector
   *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
   *
   * @code
   *   When I check the checkbox "Checkbox label"
   *   When I check the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
   * @endcode
   *
   * @When I check the checkbox :selector
   */
  public function fieldCheckboxCheck(string $selector): void {
    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);

    $this->getSession()->getPage()->checkField($selector);
  }

  /**
   * Assert that checkbox is checked.
   *
   * @param string $selector
   *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
   *
   * @code
   *   Then the checkbox "Checkbox label" should be checked
   *   Then the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value" should be checked
   * @endcode
   *
   * @Then the checkbox :selector should be checked
   */
  public function fieldCheckboxAssertChecked(string $selector): void {
    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
    $field = $this->getSession()->getPage()->findField($selector);

    if ($field === NULL) {
      throw new ElementNotFoundException(
        $this->getSession()->getDriver(),
        'form field',
        'id|name|label|value',
        $selector
      );
    }

    if (!$field->isChecked()) {
      throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox "%s" is not checked, but it should be.', $selector));
    }
  }
```

</details>

<!-- suggestion_end -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-14T02:09:49Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -310,6 +310,44 @@ public function fieldAssertSelectOptionNotSelected(string $value, string $select
     }
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Check the checkbox.
+   *
+   * @param string $selector
+   *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
+   *
+   * @code
+   *   When I check the checkbox "Checkbox label"
+   *   When I check the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
+   * @endcode
+   *
+   * @When I check the checkbox :selector
+   */
+  public function fieldCheckboxCheck(string $selector): void {
+    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
+
+    $this->getSession()->getPage()->checkField($selector);
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Uncheck the checkbox.
+   *
+   * @param string $selector
+   *   The checkbox input id, name or label.
+   *
+   * @code
+   *   When I uncheck the checkbox "Checkbox label"
+   *   When I uncheck the checkbox "edit-field-terms-0-value"
+   * @endcode
+   *
+   * @When I uncheck the checkbox :selector
+   */
+  public function fieldCheckboxUncheck(string $selector): void {
+    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);
+
+    $this->getSession()->getPage()->uncheckField($selector);
+  }
path: src/FieldTrait.php
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Consider adding error handling**

Similar to the check method, consider adding explicit error handling here to be consistent with other methods in the trait.

```diff
  public function fieldCheckboxUncheck(string $selector): void {
    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);

-   $this->getSession()->getPage()->uncheckField($selector);
+   $page = $this->getSession()->getPage();
+   $field = $page->findField($selector);
+   
+   if ($field === NULL) {
+     throw new ElementNotFoundException($this->getSession()->getDriver(), 'form field', 'id|name|label|value', $selector);
+   }
+   
+   $field->uncheck();
  }
```


<!-- suggestion_start -->

<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>

> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

```suggestion
  public function fieldCheckboxUncheck(string $selector): void {
    $selector = $this->fieldFixStepArgument($selector);

    $page  = $this->getSession()->getPage();
    $field = $page->findField($selector);

    if ($field === null) {
      throw new ElementNotFoundException(
        $this->getSession()->getDriver(),
        'form field',
        'id|name|label|value',
        $selector
      );
    }

    $field->uncheck();
  }
```

</details>

<!-- suggestion_end -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-14T02:09:49Z
author_association: NONE

PR comments:
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
created_at: 2025-05-13T10:29:23Z
body: <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->

"""
## Walkthrough

Checkbox interaction support was added to the FieldTrait, including new Behat step definitions and implementation for checking and unchecking checkboxes by selector or label. Documentation and example usage were updated, and a new scenario was added to the field.feature file to test these steps. Minor HTML and import statement adjustments were also made.

## Changes

| File(s)                                               | Change Summary                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| src/FieldTrait.php, STEPS.md                          | Added methods and step definitions for checking and unchecking checkboxes by selector or label in FieldTrait.      |
| tests/behat/features/field.feature                    | Added a new Behat scenario to test checkbox states and interactions.                                               |
| tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html                    | Updated HTML to include checkboxes and minor formatting changes.                                                   |
| tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php              | Reordered trait import statements for consistency; no functional changes.                                          |

## Sequence Diagram(s)

```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
    participant Tester as Behat Tester
    participant FieldTrait as FieldTrait
    participant Page as Mink Page

    Tester->>FieldTrait: When I check the checkbox "Label"
    FieldTrait->>FieldTrait: fieldFixStepArgument("Label")
    FieldTrait->>Page: checkField("Label")
    Page-->>FieldTrait: Checkbox checked

    Tester->>FieldTrait: When I uncheck the checkbox "Label"
    FieldTrait->>FieldTrait: fieldFixStepArgument("Label")
    FieldTrait->>Page: uncheckField("Label")
    Page-->>FieldTrait: Checkbox unchecked
```

## Poem

> In the fields where checkboxes grow,  
> Now rabbits check and uncheck in a row.  
> With steps so new and features bright,  
> Testing is easier, day or night.  
> A hop, a click, a check—hooray!  
> Checkbox magic is here to stay.  
> 🐇✔️
"""

<!-- walkthrough_end -->


---

<details>
<summary>📜 Recent review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
**Plan: Lite**

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e5083e649ac02731272c69bd41c2b7072b82afe and 82146396a64be73ed675fb49170574203195d650.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (5)</summary>

* `STEPS.md` (1 hunks)
* `src/FieldTrait.php` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/features/field.feature` (1 hunks)
* `tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html` (4 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (4)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (1)</summary>

`514-542`: **Documentation of checkbox steps looks good.**

The documentation for the new checkbox steps is well-structured and follows the existing pattern in the file. The example Gherkin usage is clear and demonstrates both label and ID usage.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (1)</summary>

`10-37`: **The trait imports reorganization is acceptable.**

The reordering of import statements doesn't affect functionality and appears to be organizing imports by grouping related traits together.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (2)</summary>

`380-387`: **Test fixture updated with checkbox elements to support new steps.**

The addition of checkbox elements to the test fixture provides the necessary HTML structure to test the new checkbox functionality. Both checked and unchecked states are included for comprehensive testing.

---

`342-342`: **CSS color notation standardization.**

Updated the hex color code from shorthand (`#ccc`) to full format (`#cccccc`), which is more consistent.

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>
<!-- internal state start -->


<!-- DwQgtGAEAqAWCWBnSTIEMB26CuAXA9mAOYCmGJATmriQCaQDG+Ats2bgFyQAOFk+AIwBWJBrngA3EsgEBPRvlqU0AgfFwA6NPEgQAfACgjoCEYDEZyAAUASpETZWaCrKNwSPbABsvkCiQBHbGlcSHFcLzpIACIAQVolegBhWFEAawF8AA9oKnVoyAB3NGQHAWZ1Gno5MNTIbERKezT4bm5KMAludGRub19/IJDIDEcBJoAWAAYplCxcOv9ufER1fBcNGDqGWExSOdwKRWwGaXQRkkKwvNCMNDZk1IYM7NztTUgAOXx0BPV4fB3XxKXDaLzIdaQJSIBgUVriQGQcayQH0BYeNB/BFYfAAM1qqEO7yKlA8vHwEngiU27k8Pj8gWCiFCDEwSI8lMuUWokFguFw3EQHAA9MKiOpYNgBBomMxhbR/BJ8ILheNdrgwMySCq+j5hdMphpzJYkiw2BhcKVHMxnK4DLTAV55LLzaFEei6QNGcNisgbUokfIPQ0mogWm0Ol0ADRFWA/QZMqrnXH9Bmcq64o7MWoeEN8JhKKiqdTaTYASSw/kQywwjRjBeUxdBOgAFGy0HgWNQoplcABKdDPDD4QqRWikNGLb3M9AYNFwoikfz0NCQFP0xXwS48I6nRCITaxYfovh5mOxSJZADKaRc3AwsjSMbQ4Pj06Tq/XXvTa6zCkLKhqM2MaFAgOxFCU9jwBUXjOE6g5pMOo50BOgY5ki+ChIUErnIc8CLqS9BfmmW6FJs3xrtgFAnlCSAMA0qyAjGuIkHQAhoM8MaQpitD/ICL4KKw7DIIUpI7hSVJRPA8x1As/iYkaBj6MY4BQGQ9B4jgBDEGQyhJi67BcLw/DCKI4hSDIzqKI2QFaDoykmFAcCoKg7adjp5BUPpZqGX4aBXA4TguGhDZFrZ2i6GAhgqaYBhXtAACiVhXhozC0BwBjRFlBgWJAsRlh5elRIFNrBZpOx7NIbiFD85ABTQ3RKLi0l8bWJL+L8iT1HOTQegAYluXi0G86j2GZALzD8uxzpEjBPC8WQHMoYgTQeWweM1FAzlq3AxgABgAAgA6qkWBlnN6ToTs6SZItHCNJEYjrHtz4+COyDXc80lEOcn0LSgSgWvAzU9vIq6weMviQg9ZnrDSdSNEwc72A1+3HadkDndgGB/Vd823ZA90kI9BAUC96BvYUyDY3932/fj2RQTBcHyJJQMg7QmwAEKYbAKPasg0kMF42ABiQWT3Nws0AOKpBQLRYA0aD7EozCAsyXl03GVwEPY7QMMDQbbAzi01BDxP8HwNS4us2bEyQrqYwAIuRPy871NwQnwO1QiQzUYK1IliWrvEc4pxp5V4NCa+rYQ/B6SjC841Crfw+Li8s1FRJCfQCF48AMJA7D/FVSl5QkUR1fzjV+y12LILQ+D0a6UlYHt8VJSlaV7d1haQANxPDTcGWQLokCHSdZCYxdzx4zdjNEyTz0GKPUATxjWM4/Nc/PATi+w2TmXZUpsU0MyiCqiQ6qqvgmEa2g3DCn1JDUFRJCmha4uaNwsDcBlWXRBypYfKhUvLFWtLaNOc1KqIDcMbSqDJ1hEEwPAAAXmcD00FM6hGZN2V0gs27P1fv4D+NAsjf1/j3GoatKQYB+pg5g2CIT4j2qafALQSAjVwD3TA9A9pO27FwnumYWDnFgtHHgKxWpx1nEXOCW4+CAhIDGIgRxsDcDpuibM2EFj8BokSUaWD1iWl/KI/hioADygoAA6XMr7UCvA1RAe1DxYgmi+J0MZGhSCoL4AxoQjHUWQC2PaCVIiuiEftAeQ1InjwGpEJ2I4MBeHwJiWJe0ADSJBZCZGcEPd45M9oABlpJpHSVYagsB0k2GkDWRo6SjrvCEQOZwHgaFRBEdmNkL8KD5yaMsVY2IZHg27Io8gz5cQSL2o03AOxG5ECEfDVA/h1iFjpo3M4x4KYSMwPIFJ4oGAxkoEcPg01aD5zoVxfMgJDj4F8LiFJVwBB4H4MksGuIWJiGQB6VZTRNIhhRng4Sa5IT+IPBHC80cU6x11gnUQsEY5tU0hnYx2c+C53zoXYu4hS5QAohVOhGD451ETgi6FSL05ZGwWizwecC5FyBjioOHV/QkCNAAowEAwBGDPpaS+19mrkLfhffw4jJBsr5MwLw/9sq5RAaQTy3Z6AlUgeVaapBYH2jqEkK8V4kQcTSKo/A2N6BMBSXwG2fAPR7TMPsnu9tHa+mgYSoif4PSIDjNRM5vJxbjzMAwANPdYV1GIqkRaDY/UBqjQwFxkAjoSmkuhG1NppJgGkp5MA9FmQsB7rxCQMZcA1UBXOF8SiwhfzmH0UIDrgWiQ6ksWCpxqhgxBRQbMSNmwBzobUFYHhC3xwrdJKtvQRbfKLX9AmQ68BClebmLe6Qog6L5ntKkABeaIU7cAAGZog8ORubXw0QUjz0WjTeadAowFF4bOmeaRF04RXbQddm6Ji7tnPQA9MRj270Zn9OgGgCi0jNZCTdRdwnsAAOSlGJriTNKTVjdtBD9J1IdgZbjRG+dp6FqwcQ8OMS1fbtjwbpogWCHrywyQ8AAKTQBINAV5YTwkojjIZe1eUf02swFsfZybWuJo0HuuCaCO0tTafkdMnUEtQp084CGiCRDABcjwe0AC+YHGiQAAN5Bp+KuftinpIeGZLIWaS6rrEe7QIKgpxXk3qU++8e/GSA93dHUcg5DIBKfDkAyOUL64yLhUnRFzCi5UtRRpdFUpMUMvCFuTV3xyDsuPlyowiAKAMCfoNfJ6gNA/z/kfQBcqCoKqKsqiBZV8RSdLtAItVcMX0rYAsRQzKMQVww0m6J2XuEyIcG0Yxt66bXrPekOmE7shnBqOieAfAqQxjuGwK5nmVDE3hm0kgTW+EgyGt+haO2WwazpgAEhhk9CgPGRi2xfGgjBCN7anfQBQIgjh2AhQ8XTPaW3aADWvA1WIj3nsWj3ZOKeIZvl1AALKlLGvuCaPBlYkCg+PP6nWe6NbjO13GHoxtZE2FeaC8AEWePHp9nbt0ACq87nj7bwt247d3SbneHG2q76CwdGfp9xZGrIfDID2sN54KPbMem4PDmR/O0g7wWtzXmkA0fNYexiDAx4lVFBwnY9U1dfb+0DhTR5dMlb7ETbLSgCt7CnDuHCFYqvdHutkBaNAi1oiTzOreyXe8TukyvcjJ3G9uqY+NiewmHv1jRFdnouWnn8AHMtkXCgJzeS8IuT9KrLXZeYjZUYCFUc9Kp2DR4Ulyd/PIrC1nCLtLovYri5yyA4P1vo86nQLge16uFxTCx2HJOTZ7YO7T4PZ2uBKipD3RN/i4lZaEXMceaWMuda4blyhZda8bYb+lceLfmMrURJ3k9FO/rU7hL3jn/fICD9oMP+YNwx+Dwn4mva0/MvX5uPP7ge0CuctPiEC+apqDChYsQ6Qv+WWGgf+uAb8MqhWwCxWukYCZWQU8gaqMCRgsQFwVw6uPIMIZAzgAIYQysqEZmh0eWjQFAPiPcTqPEUQsKww2OgKZ8tmq4VgAAElYGNMQb1MMCLqQKtmbpgZbifpQGhjdh4OLEgDQDjB4JpP2rerdGcAelEEeibH7uerQF7vQPIYHn+pzAUGWKECUEQSYgsDyHXPAB4kbBtNNjONQagOLtyMjO6qIKiCgB9EoatlgKNKsMwN4N2E4SNohiGuYSyAodekjJxoLKEOMLKGcBoeWDoa+AyJmvNGzmNEjKaoEVzoCCESgKEP4Cmm1FEVsKgBgRbtgeLJQAbI0IkSoATuoEGLpvuJQAEYHrwNIGQDZkEUoTQcoj0CSPSJBLrO0BQKJlIYzNJFCpvm1Nej4obDmNNkXB8mZOCj5pCjnjCsSvnvCoXqnMXtSmXuvpXril8D8CnjIiiqXjHrsYynFgANyvLwSrhVxoE4Lm5YE/BkFtaT4eggFvxrgE7Ka8pf72K4C/4vygFViAGDzAHAlvwuJv4nzRSOQMoaT4gdjaQlYwGCSuhcBUABTlbyA1ChSAQ5YRQOSqTonqAAD6VIiAZJm4XItAZJuC1EkUcJJJW6AAjGgAAOxbq0CsgfJbokAAAcUwtAUwnJAAbBMByRMAKQwAAJwCmslTACkTCKkCC4i0BikACskpEwTJBg8JAgUwrJYprJmpAgApAgmpHJrJtAhpDAuIspAATAwDaQIAwFuhyaoGgGKbQFuhMJqWKaxCQBybKXqfCbQFyWgKyYafKQwCaQKSQJqeyVumgEmVMEmTabKRMCQFMBMLQFabyamYXMSRAJANyQIFmVuriBaUmS/IKayRMJaSQFuuWeyQIGKRxI6cqTKayY6WgI6RyWGSSQKY6Q2WKVurKR2RKeMFyXQGKRyZqbiAIBMLKayRyemVKY6VMGybKZqRqZqbMMpPqSSS6OSZSdSSQOmHQGSepEyUAA= -->

<!-- internal state end -->
<!-- tips_start -->

---



<details>
<summary>🪧 Tips</summary>

### Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai?utm_source=oss&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=drevops/behat-steps&utm_content=400):

- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.`
  - `Explain this complex logic.`
  - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.`
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  - `@coderabbitai explain this code block.`
  -	`@coderabbitai modularize this function.`
- PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.`
  - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.`
  - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.`
  - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.`

### Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our [support page](https://www.coderabbit.ai/contact-us/support) for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

- `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR.
- `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews.
- `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
- `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
- `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR.
- `@coderabbitai generate sequence diagram` to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
- `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
- `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
- `@coderabbitai help` to get help.

### Other keywords and placeholders

- Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
- Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
- Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository.
- Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json`

### Documentation and Community

- Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

</details>

<!-- tips_end -->
author_association: NONE
user: login: codecov[bot]
created_at: 2025-05-13T10:32:11Z
body: ## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/pull/400?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops) Report
Attention: Patch coverage is `90.90909%` with `1 line` in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
> Project coverage is 80.35%. Comparing base [(`4eb70f2`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/commit/4eb70f2800614a07c70a07c0de49d4ddd634f299?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops) to head [(`3db943f`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/commit/3db943f8b51eae814b5e33db1ab6ac2848c12a27?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops).

| [Files with missing lines](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/pull/400?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops) | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| [src/CheckboxTrait.php](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/pull/400?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=src%2FCheckboxTrait.php&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops#diff-c3JjL0NoZWNrYm94VHJhaXQucGhw) | 90.90% | [1 Missing :warning: ](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/pull/400?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops) |

<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>


```diff
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #400      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.29%   80.35%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          29       30       +1     
  Lines        1959     1970      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits         1573     1583      +10     
- Misses        386      387       +1     
```

</details>

[:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/pull/400?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops).   
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops).

<details><summary> :rocket: New features to boost your workflow: </summary>

- :snowflake: [Test Analytics](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/test-analytics): Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
</details>
author_association: NONE
user: login: skipper-vp
created_at: 2025-05-13T10:55:31Z
body: @coderabbitai full review
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
created_at: 2025-05-13T10:55:37Z
body: <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
<details>
<summary>✅ Actions performed</summary>

Full review triggered.

</details>
author_association: NONE
user: login: AlexSkrypnyk
created_at: 2025-05-14T02:09:40Z
body: @coderabbit full review
author_association: MEMBER
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
created_at: 2025-05-14T02:09:45Z
body: <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
<details>
<summary>✅ Actions performed</summary>

Full review triggered.

</details>
author_association: NONE