Repository: TexasInstruments/processor-sdk-doc
Pull request #245: docs(linux): AM62X, AM62AX, AM62PX: Update LPM power measurements
Author: login: kwillis01
Created: 2025-04-03T14:36:10Z | Merged: 2025-04-07T13:22:02Z

Update the power measurements for each low power mode for SDK 11.0 on AM62PX, AM62AX, and AM62X.


Diff:
diff --git a/source/devices/AM62AX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst b/source/devices/AM62AX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
index 1fc5fb505..8ffd955b2 100644
--- a/source/devices/AM62AX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
+++ b/source/devices/AM62AX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
@@ -707,28 +707,32 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","16.82"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.96"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","19.16"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","2.34"
     "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","4.63"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.44"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","10.72"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","6.07"
-    "Total"," ","41.64"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.03"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","11.22"
+    "vdd_lpddr4","1.10","3.59"
+    "Total"," ","42.96"
 
 Table:  **MCU only**
 
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","112.87"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.49"
-    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","9.58"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.71"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.37"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","5.79"
-    "Total"," ","150.82"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","199.73"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","3.28"
+    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","10.49"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.80"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.42"
+    "vdd_lpddr4","1.10","4.41"
+    "Total"," ","239.14"
 
 Partial I/O Data
 - All voltage rails were measured to be near 0V
 
+.. note::
+
+   The measurements shown are from an AM62Ax rev E3. Results may vary based off of the board revision being used.
+
 Further optimizations are possible for these low power modes. Please refer to the AM62x Power Consumption App Note (https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spradg1)
diff --git a/source/devices/AM62PX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst b/source/devices/AM62PX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
index e210a9f15..3f066de8c 100644
--- a/source/devices/AM62PX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
+++ b/source/devices/AM62PX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
@@ -790,26 +790,26 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
    :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-   "vdd_core","0.85","12.98"
-   "vddr_core","0.85","1.01"
-   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","5.65"
-   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.76"
+   "vdd_core","0.85","11.23"
+   "vddr_core","0.85","0.90"
+   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","6.51"
+   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.69"
    "vdda_1v8","1.80","72.23"
-   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","3.75"
-   "Total"," ","98.37"
+   "vdd_lpddr4","1.10","0.33"
+   "Total"," ","93.89"
 
 Table:  **MCU only**
 
 .. csv-table::
    :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-   "vdd_core","0.85","203.98"
-   "vddr_core","0.85","2.44"
-   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","5.55"
-   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.68"
-   "vdda_1v8","1.80","81.25"
-   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","4.33"
-   "Total"," ","300.24"
+   "vdd_core","0.85","209.16"
+   "vddr_core","0.85","2.53"
+   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","6.97"
+   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.70"
+   "vdda_1v8","1.80","80.10"
+   "vdd_lpddr4","1.10","0.31"
+   "Total"," ","301.77"
 
 Partial I/O Data
 - All voltage rails were measured to be near 0V
@@ -819,4 +819,8 @@ Partial I/O Data
    The power consumption on the vdda_1v8 rail is not indicitive of the SoC's power consumption due to an oscillator on the rail
    that has significant current consumption.
 
+.. note::
+
+   The measurements shown are from an AM62Px SK rev E1-1. Results may vary based off of the board revision being used.
+
 Further optimizations are possible for these low power modes. Please refer to the AM62x Power Consumption App Note (https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spradg1)
diff --git a/source/devices/AM62X/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst b/source/devices/AM62X/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
index 090f5f5bf..ec427377d 100644
--- a/source/devices/AM62X/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
+++ b/source/devices/AM62X/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
@@ -799,28 +799,32 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
    :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-   "vdd_core","0.85","9.79"
+   "vdd_core","0.85","9.61"
    "vddr_core","0.85","n/a"
-   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","7.20"
-   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.98"
-   "vdda_1v8","1.80","1.98"
-   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","8.78"
-   "Total"," ","29.75"
+   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","7.03"
+   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.43"
+   "vdda_1v8","1.80","1.80"
+   "vdd_ddr4","1.10","8.73"
+   "Total"," ","29.60"
 
 Table:  **MCU only**
 
 .. csv-table::
    :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-   "vdd_core","0.85","110.46"
+   "vdd_core","0.85","109.78"
    "vddr_core","0.85","n/a"
-   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","13.98"
-   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.62"
-   "vdda_1v8","1.80","11.30"
-   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","8.16"
-   "Total"," ","145.88"
+   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","14.48"
+   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.94"
+   "vdda_1v8","1.80","10.94"
+   "vdd_ddr4","1.10","8.76"
+   "Total"," ","145.90"
 
 Partial I/O Data
 - All voltage rails were measured to be near 0V
 
+.. note::
+
+   The measurements shown are from an SK-AM62B-P1. Results may vary based off of the board variant being used.
+
 Further optimizations are possible for these low power modes. Please refer to the AM62x Power Consumption App Note (https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spradg1)


Reviews:
user: login: akashdeep-ti
state: CHANGES_REQUESTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T05:02:59Z
user: login: akashdeep-ti
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T05:21:05Z
user: login: cshilwant
body: Comments from @akashdeep-ti needs to be addressed
state: DISMISSED
author_association: MEMBER
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T05:56:52Z
user: login: kwillis01
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T14:26:30Z
user: login: kwillis01
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T14:28:42Z
user: login: kwillis01
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T14:35:27Z
user: login: kwillis01
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T14:35:49Z
user: login: akashdeep-ti
body: Looks good to me
state: APPROVED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-07T07:10:27Z
user: login: cshilwant
state: APPROVED
author_association: MEMBER
submitted_at: 2025-04-07T07:34:39Z
user: login: jeevantelukula
state: APPROVED
author_association: COLLABORATOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-07T08:04:06Z
user: login: akashdeep-ti
body: Minor changes required outside of current changes
state: CHANGES_REQUESTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-07T10:16:26Z

Review comments:
diff_hunk: @@ -707,28 +707,32 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","16.82"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.96"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","19.16"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","2.34"
     "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","4.63"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.44"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","10.72"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","6.07"
-    "Total"," ","41.64"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.03"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","11.22"
+    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","3.59"
+    "Total"," ","42.96"
 
 Table:  **MCU only**
 
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","112.87"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.49"
-    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","9.58"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.71"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.37"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","5.79"
-    "Total"," ","150.82"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","199.73"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","3.28"
+    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","10.49"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.80"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.42"
+    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","4.41"
+    "Total"," ","239.14"
 
 Partial I/O Data
 - All voltage rails were measured to be near 0V
 
+.. note::
+
+   The measurements shown are from an AM62A Revison E3 board. Results may vary based off of the board revision being used.
path: source/devices/AM62AX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
user: login: akashdeep-ti
body: The earlier measurements were from which board revision?
created_at: 2025-04-04T04:56:14Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -799,26 +799,26 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
    :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-   "vdd_core","0.85","9.79"
+   "vdd_core","0.85","9.61"
    "vddr_core","0.85","n/a"
-   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","7.20"
-   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.98"
-   "vdda_1v8","1.80","1.98"
-   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","8.78"
-   "Total"," ","29.75"
+   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","7.03"
+   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.43"
+   "vdda_1v8","1.80","1.80"
+   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","8.73"
+   "Total"," ","29.60"
path: source/devices/AM62X/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
user: login: akashdeep-ti
body: Is the total number describing lpddr4 power number or ddr4 power number?
created_at: 2025-04-04T04:57:22Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -790,26 +790,26 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
    :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-   "vdd_core","0.85","12.98"
-   "vddr_core","0.85","1.01"
-   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","5.65"
-   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.76"
+   "vdd_core","0.85","11.23"
+   "vddr_core","0.85","0.90"
+   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","6.51"
+   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.69"
    "vdda_1v8","1.80","72.23"
-   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","3.75"
-   "Total"," ","98.37"
+   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","0.33"
+   "Total"," ","93.89"
 
 Table:  **MCU only**
 
 .. csv-table::
    :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-   "vdd_core","0.85","203.98"
-   "vddr_core","0.85","2.44"
-   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","5.55"
-   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.68"
-   "vdda_1v8","1.80","81.25"
-   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","4.33"
-   "Total"," ","300.24"
+   "vdd_core","0.85","209.16"
+   "vddr_core","0.85","2.53"
+   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","6.97"
+   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.70"
+   "vdda_1v8","1.80","80.10"
+   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","0.31"
path: source/devices/AM62PX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
user: login: akashdeep-ti
body: As there is no am62px EVM with DDR4, we can remove ddr4 entry
created_at: 2025-04-04T04:59:04Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -707,28 +707,32 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","16.82"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.96"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","19.16"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","2.34"
     "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","4.63"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.44"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","10.72"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","6.07"
-    "Total"," ","41.64"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.03"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","11.22"
+    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","3.59"
+    "Total"," ","42.96"
 
 Table:  **MCU only**
 
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","112.87"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.49"
-    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","9.58"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.71"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.37"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","5.79"
-    "Total"," ","150.82"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","199.73"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","3.28"
+    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","10.49"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.80"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.42"
+    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","4.41"
path: source/devices/AM62AX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
user: login: akashdeep-ti
body: As we have only DDR4 or LPDDR4 number, can we just change this entry to ddr4 or lpddr4 or add a note to give that information?
created_at: 2025-04-04T05:02:54Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -707,28 +707,32 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","16.82"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.96"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","19.16"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","2.34"
     "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","4.63"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.44"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","10.72"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","6.07"
-    "Total"," ","41.64"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.03"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","11.22"
+    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","3.59"
+    "Total"," ","42.96"
 
 Table:  **MCU only**
 
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","112.87"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.49"
-    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","9.58"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.71"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.37"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","5.79"
-    "Total"," ","150.82"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","199.73"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","3.28"
+    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","10.49"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.80"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.42"
+    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","4.41"
+    "Total"," ","239.14"
path: source/devices/AM62AX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
user: login: akashdeep-ti
body: The power consumption seems to be more by 90mW as compared in previous release. Can we retake this measurement?
created_at: 2025-04-04T05:21:05Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -707,28 +707,32 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","16.82"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.96"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","19.16"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","2.34"
     "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","4.63"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.44"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","10.72"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","6.07"
-    "Total"," ","41.64"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.03"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","11.22"
+    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","3.59"
+    "Total"," ","42.96"
 
 Table:  **MCU only**
 
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","112.87"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.49"
-    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","9.58"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.71"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.37"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","5.79"
-    "Total"," ","150.82"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","199.73"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","3.28"
+    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","10.49"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.80"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.42"
+    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","4.41"
+    "Total"," ","239.14"
 
 Partial I/O Data
 - All voltage rails were measured to be near 0V
 
+.. note::
+
+   The measurements shown are from an AM62A Revison E3 board. Results may vary based off of the board revision being used.
path: source/devices/AM62AX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
user: login: kwillis01
body: they have been from E3, but for SDK 10.1 we used E2 for MCU Only due to some issues with MCU Only on the E3 board I had
created_at: 2025-04-04T14:26:30Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -707,28 +707,32 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","16.82"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.96"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","19.16"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","2.34"
     "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","4.63"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.44"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","10.72"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","6.07"
-    "Total"," ","41.64"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.03"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","11.22"
+    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","3.59"
+    "Total"," ","42.96"
 
 Table:  **MCU only**
 
 .. csv-table::
     :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-    "vdd_core","0.85","112.87"
-    "vddr_core","0.85","1.49"
-    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","9.58"
-    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.71"
-    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.37"
-    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","5.79"
-    "Total"," ","150.82"
+    "vdd_core","0.85","199.73"
+    "vddr_core","0.85","3.28"
+    "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","10.49"
+    "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.80"
+    "vdda_1v8","1.80","19.42"
+    "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","4.41"
+    "Total"," ","239.14"
path: source/devices/AM62AX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
user: login: kwillis01
body: for SDK 10.1, I used E2 board for MCU Only numbers. I retook 10.1 MCU Only numbers on E3 board and there is not a significant different. The SDK 10.1 MCU Only on E3 board total power for reference was: 236.22 mW
created_at: 2025-04-04T14:28:42Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -799,26 +799,26 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
    :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-   "vdd_core","0.85","9.79"
+   "vdd_core","0.85","9.61"
    "vddr_core","0.85","n/a"
-   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","7.20"
-   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","1.98"
-   "vdda_1v8","1.80","1.98"
-   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","8.78"
-   "Total"," ","29.75"
+   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","7.03"
+   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.43"
+   "vdda_1v8","1.80","1.80"
+   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","8.73"
+   "Total"," ","29.60"
path: source/devices/AM62X/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
user: login: kwillis01
body: it is ddr4 power number
created_at: 2025-04-04T14:35:27Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -790,26 +790,26 @@ Table:  **Deep sleep**
 .. csv-table::
    :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-   "vdd_core","0.85","12.98"
-   "vddr_core","0.85","1.01"
-   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","5.65"
-   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.76"
+   "vdd_core","0.85","11.23"
+   "vddr_core","0.85","0.90"
+   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","6.51"
+   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.69"
    "vdda_1v8","1.80","72.23"
-   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","3.75"
-   "Total"," ","98.37"
+   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","0.33"
+   "Total"," ","93.89"
 
 Table:  **MCU only**
 
 .. csv-table::
    :header: "Rail name","Rail voltage(V)","Power (mW)"
 
-   "vdd_core","0.85","203.98"
-   "vddr_core","0.85","2.44"
-   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","5.55"
-   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.68"
-   "vdda_1v8","1.80","81.25"
-   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","4.33"
-   "Total"," ","300.24"
+   "vdd_core","0.85","209.16"
+   "vddr_core","0.85","2.53"
+   "soc_dvdd_3v3","3.30","6.97"
+   "soc_dvdd_1v8","1.80","2.70"
+   "vdda_1v8","1.80","80.10"
+   "vdd_lpddr4/vdd_ddr4","1.10","0.31"
path: source/devices/AM62PX/linux/Linux_Performance_Guide.rst
user: login: kwillis01
body: yes ill remove ddr4
created_at: 2025-04-04T14:35:49Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR

PR comments:
user: login: StaticRocket
created_at: 2025-04-03T18:26:41Z
body: While `perf` is an approved commit tag, it generally carries other meaning: https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/22b96b9/CONTRIBUTING.md#type
author_association: MEMBER
user: login: vishalmti
created_at: 2025-04-03T21:53:42Z
body: Add info about revision of the board used for these measurements.
author_association: COLLABORATOR
user: login: StaticRocket
created_at: 2025-04-03T22:49:57Z
body: I won't harp on this, because other people have also been ignoring it, but for future reference: https://github.com/TexasInstruments/processor-sdk-doc/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-formatting
author_association: MEMBER
user: login: kwillis01
created_at: 2025-04-04T15:02:50Z
body: @StaticRocket  not quite sure what the correct commit tag here would be. I used fix instead of feat because I was updating power numbers to be for this release, which doesn't seem like a new feature to me.
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
user: login: cshilwant
created_at: 2025-04-04T18:09:16Z
body: @akashdeep-ti to re-review 
author_association: MEMBER
user: login: akashdeep-ti
created_at: 2025-04-07T10:12:38Z
body: Minor: To enter MCU Only mode, set 100000 usec resume latency for CPU0 in linux: 
Can we change this to 100 msec instead?
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
user: login: akashdeep-ti
created_at: 2025-04-07T10:15:31Z
body: This line needs modification https://github.com/TexasInstruments/processor-sdk-doc/blob/master/source/linux/Foundational_Components/Power_Management/pm_wakeup_sources.rst#confirming-the-wakeup-event-type
As the wake reason API is changed now, the pin number if valid is also printed. Can we add that information?
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
user: login: akashdeep-ti
created_at: 2025-04-07T10:19:38Z
body: https://github.com/TexasInstruments/processor-sdk-doc/blob/master/source/linux/Foundational_Components/Power_Management/pm_sw_arch.rst
If a device wants to put a constraint to not be powered-off, it can use the Linux QoS framework and set the DEV_PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY equal to 0. An example is shown in the following RemoteProc driver: https://git.ti.com/cgit/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel/tree/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c?h=11.00.09#n549

As remoteproc perform late suspend, this statement is invalid. Can we please remove this paragraph ?

author_association: CONTRIBUTOR