Repository: cline/cline
Pull request #2198: LLM Observability
Author: login: pashpashpash
Created: 2025-03-12T02:31:47Z | Merged: 2025-03-21T01:22:06Z

### Description

Opt-in observability for messages to/from LLM

### Test Procedure

Open chat, send message, confirm you see the console log (only if you're opted in, in settings)

### Type of Change

<!-- Put an 'x' in all boxes that apply -->

-   [ ] 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
-   [x] ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
-   [ ] 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
-   [ ] 📚 Documentation update

### Pre-flight Checklist

<!-- Put an 'x' in all boxes that apply -->

-   [x] Changes are limited to a single feature, bugfix or chore (split larger changes into separate PRs)
-   [x] Tests are passing (`npm test`) and code is formatted and linted (`npm run format && npm run lint`)
-   [x] I have created a changeset using `npm run changeset` (required for user-facing changes)
-   [x] I have reviewed [contributor guidelines](https://github.com/cline/cline/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)

### Screenshots

n/a

### Additional Notes

DRAFT
<!-- ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN -->


----

> [!IMPORTANT]
> Adds opt-in LLM observability using OpenTelemetry for capturing and sending telemetry data of LLM interactions.
> 
>   - **Behavior**:
>     - Introduces opt-in observability for LLM messages in `Cline.ts` and `ClineProvider.ts`.
>     - Logs messages to console if opted-in via settings.
>     - Uses OpenTelemetry for capturing message data.
>   - **Configuration**:
>     - Adds `cline.conversationTelemetry` setting in `package.json` for enabling telemetry.
>     - Default is set to `false`.
>   - **Telemetry**:
>     - Implements `ConversationTelemetryService` in `ConversationTelemetryService.ts` for handling telemetry data.
>     - Captures user, assistant, and system messages as OpenTelemetry spans.
>     - Sends telemetry data to a specified endpoint if opted-in.
>   - **Dependencies**:
>     - Adds OpenTelemetry packages to `package.json` dependencies.
> 
> <sup>This description was created by </sup>[<img alt="Ellipsis" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Ellipsis-blue?color=175173">](https://www.ellipsis.dev?ref=cline%2Fcline&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral)<sup> for 8a162827e53e6fc894a111ffa66ec965895a2d64. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.</sup>


<!-- ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN -->


Diff:
diff --git a/.changeset/happy-taxis-heal.md b/.changeset/happy-taxis-heal.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..43bf9dfe0fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.changeset/happy-taxis-heal.md
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+---
+"claude-dev": minor
+---
+
+opt-in llm observability
diff --git a/package-lock.json b/package-lock.json
index c01e938f322..0c0a017e4b6 100644
--- a/package-lock.json
+++ b/package-lock.json
@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
 				"@google/generative-ai": "^0.18.0",
 				"@mistralai/mistralai": "^1.5.0",
 				"@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "^1.7.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.4.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http": "^0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "^1.30.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-node": "^0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node": "^1.30.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "^1.30.0",
 				"@types/clone-deep": "^4.0.4",
 				"@types/get-folder-size": "^3.0.4",
 				"@types/pdf-parse": "^1.1.4",
@@ -5929,6 +5935,806 @@
 				"node": ">= 8"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/api": {
+			"version": "1.4.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/api/-/api-1.4.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-O2yRJce1GOc6PAy3QxFM4NzFiWzvScDC1/5ihYBL6BUEVdq0XMWN01sppE+H6bBXbaFYipjwFLEWLg5PaSOThA==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=8.0.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/api-logs": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/api-logs/-/api-logs-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-9BJ8lMcOzEN0lu+Qji801y707oFO4xT3db6cosPvl+k7ItUHKN5ofWqtSbM9gbt1H4JJ/4/2TVrqI9Rq7hNv6Q==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.0.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/context-async-hooks": {
+			"version": "1.30.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/context-async-hooks/-/context-async-hooks-1.30.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-s5vvxXPVdjqS3kTLKMeBMvop9hbWkwzBpu+mUO2M7sZtlkyDJGwFe33wRKnbaYDo8ExRVBIIdwIGrqpxHuKttA==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.10.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/core": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/core/-/core-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-2dBX3Sj99H96uwJKvc2w9NOiNgbvAO6mOFJFramNkKfS9O4Um+VWgpnlAazoYjT6kUJ1MP70KQ5ngD4ed+4NUw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/core/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-jaeger": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/exporter-jaeger/-/exporter-jaeger-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-ke/STs/erRDqKmNv6Dv+5SetXsVD+Zm1/Wo8cLdAGrZn6kG6Fyp5EXVO/BJuzx6q+jHCdODm8jV4veXl4m71nQ==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0",
+				"jaeger-client": "^3.15.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.0.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-jaeger/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc/-/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-l5RhLKx6U+yuLhMrtgavTDthX50E1mZM3/SSySC7OPZiArFHV/b/9x9jxAzrOgIQUDxyj4N0V9aLKSA2t7Qzxg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@grpc/grpc-js": "^1.7.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/otlp-grpc-exporter-base": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/otlp-transformer": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.0.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc/node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/resources/-/resources-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-euqjOkiN6xhjE//0vQYGvbStxoD/WWQRhDiO0OTLlnLBO9Yw2Gd/VoSx2H+svsebjzYk5OxLuREBmcdw6rbUNg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http/-/exporter-trace-otlp-http-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-AEhnJfVmo1g+7NxszAuf3c6vddld2DGH2+IM4XrPxCklucCsIpuStuC5EVZbCXXXBMpAY+n3t04QMxIQqNrcSw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/otlp-exporter-base": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/otlp-transformer": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.0.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http/node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/resources/-/resources-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-euqjOkiN6xhjE//0vQYGvbStxoD/WWQRhDiO0OTLlnLBO9Yw2Gd/VoSx2H+svsebjzYk5OxLuREBmcdw6rbUNg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-proto": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-proto/-/exporter-trace-otlp-proto-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-oJQC7a67iwExRYynKqn/O9Fl5gUjDa43ZQsZu2iKAADs/6YJ+u5MJ/wcq3CpJsn2KU/8j8HWAKOcDkkQXPuJ9A==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/otlp-exporter-base": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/otlp-proto-exporter-base": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/otlp-transformer": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.0.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-proto/node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/resources/-/resources-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-euqjOkiN6xhjE//0vQYGvbStxoD/WWQRhDiO0OTLlnLBO9Yw2Gd/VoSx2H+svsebjzYk5OxLuREBmcdw6rbUNg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-proto/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-zipkin": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/exporter-zipkin/-/exporter-zipkin-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-4IuUmYEhlHm8tAGtd6KKkktEO9Bt7dpdBdAPVAzhmXsPwGi0yExo7E5qfi9HtHQcdfP9SnrGRkeorVtrZkGlhg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.0.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-zipkin/node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/resources/-/resources-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-euqjOkiN6xhjE//0vQYGvbStxoD/WWQRhDiO0OTLlnLBO9Yw2Gd/VoSx2H+svsebjzYk5OxLuREBmcdw6rbUNg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/exporter-zipkin/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/instrumentation": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/instrumentation/-/instrumentation-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-s7/9tPmM0l5KCd07VQizC4AO2/5UJdkXq5gMSHPdCeiMKSeBEdyDyQX7A+Cq+RYZM452qzFmrJ4ut628J5bnSg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"require-in-the-middle": "^7.1.0",
+				"semver": "^7.3.2",
+				"shimmer": "^1.2.1"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.3.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/otlp-exporter-base": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/otlp-exporter-base/-/otlp-exporter-base-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-Pv5X8fbi6jD/RJBePyn7MnCSuE6MbPB6dl+7YYBWJ5RcMGYMwvLXjd4h2jWsPV2TSUg38H/RoSP0aXvQ06Y7iw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.0.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/otlp-grpc-exporter-base": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/otlp-grpc-exporter-base/-/otlp-grpc-exporter-base-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-u3ErFRQqQFKjjIMuwLWxz/tLPYInfmiAmSy//fGSCzCh2ZdJgqQjMOAxBgqFtCF2xFL+OmMhyuC2ThMzceGRWA==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@grpc/grpc-js": "^1.7.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/otlp-exporter-base": "0.39.1",
+				"protobufjs": "^7.2.2"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.0.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/otlp-proto-exporter-base": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/otlp-proto-exporter-base/-/otlp-proto-exporter-base-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-VssdfGYu6LkSliQATdkvoP8lPSQuNLENRdHTUOV2veF4iqY/UpxBFFlkarY29W+MYjWXIBfYntgNjQvcn78A+w==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/otlp-exporter-base": "0.39.1",
+				"protobufjs": "^7.1.2"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.0.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/otlp-transformer": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/otlp-transformer/-/otlp-transformer-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-0hgVnXXz5efI382B/24NxD4b6Zxlh7nxCdJkxkdmQMbn0yRiwoq/ZT+QG8eUL6JNzsBAV1WJlF5aJNsL8skHvw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api-logs": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-logs": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.3.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/otlp-transformer/node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/resources/-/resources-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-euqjOkiN6xhjE//0vQYGvbStxoD/WWQRhDiO0OTLlnLBO9Yw2Gd/VoSx2H+svsebjzYk5OxLuREBmcdw6rbUNg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/otlp-transformer/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/propagator-b3": {
+			"version": "1.30.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/propagator-b3/-/propagator-b3-1.30.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-oATwWWDIJzybAZ4pO76ATN5N6FFbOA1otibAVlS8v90B4S1wClnhRUk7K+2CHAwN1JKYuj4jh/lpCEG5BAqFuQ==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.30.1"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.10.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/propagator-b3/node_modules/@opentelemetry/core": {
+			"version": "1.30.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/core/-/core-1.30.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-OOCM2C/QIURhJMuKaekP3TRBxBKxG/TWWA0TL2J6nXUtDnuCtccy49LUJF8xPFXMX+0LMcxFpCo8M9cGY1W6rQ==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.28.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.10.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/propagator-b3/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.28.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.28.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-lp4qAiMTD4sNWW4DbKLBkfiMZ4jbAboJIGOQr5DvciMRI494OapieI9qiODpOt0XBr1LjIDy1xAGAnVs5supTA==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger": {
+			"version": "1.30.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger/-/propagator-jaeger-1.30.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-Pj/BfnYEKIOImirH76M4hDaBSx6HyZ2CXUqk+Kj02m6BB80c/yo4BdWkn/1gDFfU+YPY+bPR2U0DKBfdxCKwmg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.30.1"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.10.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger/node_modules/@opentelemetry/core": {
+			"version": "1.30.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/core/-/core-1.30.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-OOCM2C/QIURhJMuKaekP3TRBxBKxG/TWWA0TL2J6nXUtDnuCtccy49LUJF8xPFXMX+0LMcxFpCo8M9cGY1W6rQ==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.28.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.10.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.28.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.28.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-lp4qAiMTD4sNWW4DbKLBkfiMZ4jbAboJIGOQr5DvciMRI494OapieI9qiODpOt0XBr1LjIDy1xAGAnVs5supTA==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources": {
+			"version": "1.30.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/resources/-/resources-1.30.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-5UxZqiAgLYGFjS4s9qm5mBVo433u+dSPUFWVWXmLAD4wB65oMCoXaJP1KJa9DIYYMeHu3z4BZcStG3LC593cWA==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.30.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.28.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.10.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources/node_modules/@opentelemetry/core": {
+			"version": "1.30.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/core/-/core-1.30.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-OOCM2C/QIURhJMuKaekP3TRBxBKxG/TWWA0TL2J6nXUtDnuCtccy49LUJF8xPFXMX+0LMcxFpCo8M9cGY1W6rQ==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.28.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.10.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.28.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.28.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-lp4qAiMTD4sNWW4DbKLBkfiMZ4jbAboJIGOQr5DvciMRI494OapieI9qiODpOt0XBr1LjIDy1xAGAnVs5supTA==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-logs": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/sdk-logs/-/sdk-logs-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-/gmgKfZ1ZVFporKuwsewqIyvaUIGpv76JZ7lBpHQQPb37IMpaXO6pdqFI4ebHAWfNIm3akMyhmdtzivcgF3lgw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.4.0 <1.5.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/api-logs": ">=0.38.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-logs/node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/resources/-/resources-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-euqjOkiN6xhjE//0vQYGvbStxoD/WWQRhDiO0OTLlnLBO9Yw2Gd/VoSx2H+svsebjzYk5OxLuREBmcdw6rbUNg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-logs/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics/-/sdk-metrics-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-MOjZX6AnSOqLliCcZUrb+DQKjAWXBiGeICGbHAGe5w0BB18PJIeIo995lO5JSaFfHpmUMgJButTPfJJD27W3Vg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "1.13.0",
+				"lodash.merge": "4.6.2"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.3.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics/node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/resources/-/resources-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-euqjOkiN6xhjE//0vQYGvbStxoD/WWQRhDiO0OTLlnLBO9Yw2Gd/VoSx2H+svsebjzYk5OxLuREBmcdw6rbUNg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-node": {
+			"version": "0.39.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/sdk-node/-/sdk-node-0.39.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-qODReBGNSdfRS5gvCFj1SdiIi/3ZFTZb0H1KvWE/OrTkklyL5RhIs7vDwvEGHmha+YpUu0Y2+R2+itSBSu/jCA==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/exporter-jaeger": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-proto": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/exporter-zipkin": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/instrumentation": "0.39.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.3.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-node/node_modules/@opentelemetry/context-async-hooks": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/context-async-hooks/-/context-async-hooks-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-pS5fU4lrRjOIPZQqA2V1SUM9QUFXbO+8flubAiy6ntLjnAjJJUdRFOUOxK6v86ZHI2p2S8A0vD0BTu95FZYvjA==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-node/node_modules/@opentelemetry/propagator-b3": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/propagator-b3/-/propagator-b3-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-HOo91EI4UbuG8xQVLFziTzrcIn0MJQhy8m9jorh8aonb94jFVFi3CFNIiAnIGOabmnshJLOABxpYXsiPB8Xnzg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-node/node_modules/@opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger/-/propagator-jaeger-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-IV9TO+u1Jzm9mUDAD3gyXf89eyvgEJUY1t+GB5QmS4wjVeWrSMUtD0JjH3yG9SNqkrQOqOGJq7YUSSetW+Lf5Q==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-node/node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/resources/-/resources-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-euqjOkiN6xhjE//0vQYGvbStxoD/WWQRhDiO0OTLlnLBO9Yw2Gd/VoSx2H+svsebjzYk5OxLuREBmcdw6rbUNg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-node/node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node/-/sdk-trace-node-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-FXA85lXKTsnbOflA/TBuBf2pmhD3c8uDjNjG0YqK+ap8UayfALmfJhf+aG1yBOUHevCY0JXJ4/xtbXExxpsMog==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/context-async-hooks": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/propagator-b3": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": "1.13.0",
+				"semver": "^7.3.5"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-node/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base/-/sdk-trace-base-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-moTiQtc0uPR1hQLt6gLDJH9IIkeBhgRb71OKjNHZPE1VF45fHtD6nBDi5J/DkTHTwYP5X3kBJLa3xN7ub6J4eg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base/node_modules/@opentelemetry/resources": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/resources/-/resources-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-euqjOkiN6xhjE//0vQYGvbStxoD/WWQRhDiO0OTLlnLBO9Yw2Gd/VoSx2H+svsebjzYk5OxLuREBmcdw6rbUNg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.13.0",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.13.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.5.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.13.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.13.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LMGqfSZkaMQXqewO0o1wvWr/2fQdCh4a3Sqlxka/UsJCe0cfLulh6x2aqnKLnsrSGiCq5rSCwvINd152i0nCqw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node": {
+			"version": "1.30.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node/-/sdk-trace-node-1.30.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-cBjYOINt1JxXdpw1e5MlHmFRc5fgj4GW/86vsKFxJCJ8AL4PdVtYH41gWwl4qd4uQjqEL1oJVrXkSy5cnduAnQ==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/context-async-hooks": "1.30.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.30.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/propagator-b3": "1.30.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger": "1.30.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": "1.30.1",
+				"semver": "^7.5.2"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.10.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node/node_modules/@opentelemetry/core": {
+			"version": "1.30.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/core/-/core-1.30.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-OOCM2C/QIURhJMuKaekP3TRBxBKxG/TWWA0TL2J6nXUtDnuCtccy49LUJF8xPFXMX+0LMcxFpCo8M9cGY1W6rQ==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.28.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.10.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node/node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base": {
+			"version": "1.30.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base/-/sdk-trace-base-1.30.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-jVPgBbH1gCy2Lb7X0AVQ8XAfgg0pJ4nvl8/IiQA6nxOsPvS+0zMJaFSs2ltXe0J6C8dqjcnpyqINDJmU30+uOg==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/core": "1.30.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/resources": "1.30.1",
+				"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "1.28.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			},
+			"peerDependencies": {
+				"@opentelemetry/api": ">=1.0.0 <1.10.0"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node/node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.28.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.28.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-lp4qAiMTD4sNWW4DbKLBkfiMZ4jbAboJIGOQr5DvciMRI494OapieI9qiODpOt0XBr1LjIDy1xAGAnVs5supTA==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": {
+			"version": "1.30.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions/-/semantic-conventions-1.30.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-4VlGgo32k2EQ2wcCY3vEU28A0O13aOtHz3Xt2/2U5FAh9EfhD6t6DqL5Z6yAnRCntbTFDU4YfbpyzSlHNWycPw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=14"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/@pkgjs/parseargs": {
 			"version": "0.11.0",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@pkgjs/parseargs/-/parseargs-0.11.0.tgz",
@@ -8343,6 +9149,14 @@
 				"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/epoberezkin"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/ansi-color": {
+			"version": "0.2.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-color/-/ansi-color-0.2.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-bF6xLaZBLpOQzgYUtYEhJx090nPSZk1BQ/q2oyBK9aMMcJHzx9uXGCjI2Y+LebsN4Jwoykr0V9whbPiogdyHoQ==",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": "*"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/ansi-colors": {
 			"version": "4.1.3",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-colors/-/ansi-colors-4.1.3.tgz",
@@ -8795,6 +9609,20 @@
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/buffer-equal-constant-time/-/buffer-equal-constant-time-1.0.1.tgz",
 			"integrity": "sha512-zRpUiDwd/xk6ADqPMATG8vc9VPrkck7T07OIx0gnjmJAnHnTVXNQG3vfvWNuiZIkwu9KrKdA1iJKfsfTVxE6NA=="
 		},
+		"node_modules/bufrw": {
+			"version": "1.4.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/bufrw/-/bufrw-1.4.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-sWm8iPbqvL9+5SiYxXH73UOkyEbGQg7kyHQmReF89WJHQJw2eV4P/yZ0E+b71cczJ4pPobVhXxgQcmfSTgGHxQ==",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"ansi-color": "^0.2.1",
+				"error": "^7.0.0",
+				"hexer": "^1.5.0",
+				"xtend": "^4.0.0"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">= 0.10.x"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/bytes": {
 			"version": "3.1.2",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/bytes/-/bytes-3.1.2.tgz",
@@ -9832,6 +10660,15 @@
 				"url": "https://github.com/fb55/entities?sponsor=1"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/error": {
+			"version": "7.0.2",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/error/-/error-7.0.2.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-UtVv4l5MhijsYUxPJo4390gzfZvAnTHreNnDjnTZaKIiZ/SemXxAhBkYSKtWa5RtBXbLP8tMgn/n0RUa/H7jXw==",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"string-template": "~0.2.1",
+				"xtend": "~4.0.0"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/error-ex": {
 			"version": "1.3.2",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/error-ex/-/error-ex-1.3.2.tgz",
@@ -11519,6 +12356,23 @@
 				"he": "bin/he"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/hexer": {
+			"version": "1.5.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/hexer/-/hexer-1.5.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-dyrPC8KzBzUJ19QTIo1gXNqIISRXQ0NwteW6OeQHRN4ZuZeHkdODfj0zHBdOlHbRY8GqbqK57C9oWSvQZizFsg==",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"ansi-color": "^0.2.1",
+				"minimist": "^1.1.0",
+				"process": "^0.10.0",
+				"xtend": "^4.0.0"
+			},
+			"bin": {
+				"hexer": "cli.js"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">= 0.10.x"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/hosted-git-info": {
 			"version": "2.8.9",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/hosted-git-info/-/hosted-git-info-2.8.9.tgz",
@@ -11862,7 +12716,6 @@
 			"version": "2.14.0",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/is-core-module/-/is-core-module-2.14.0.tgz",
 			"integrity": "sha512-a5dFJih5ZLYlRtDc0dZWP7RiKr6xIKzmn/oAYCDvdLThadVgyJwlaoQPmRtMSpz+rk0OGAgIu+TcM9HUF0fk1A==",
-			"dev": true,
 			"license": "MIT",
 			"dependencies": {
 				"hasown": "^2.0.2"
@@ -12269,6 +13122,31 @@
 				"@pkgjs/parseargs": "^0.11.0"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/jaeger-client": {
+			"version": "3.19.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/jaeger-client/-/jaeger-client-3.19.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-M0c7cKHmdyEUtjemnJyx/y9uX16XHocL46yQvyqDlPdvAcwPDbHrIbKjQdBqtiE4apQ/9dmr+ZLJYYPGnurgpw==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"node-int64": "^0.4.0",
+				"opentracing": "^0.14.4",
+				"thriftrw": "^3.5.0",
+				"uuid": "^8.3.2",
+				"xorshift": "^1.1.1"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=10"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/jaeger-client/node_modules/uuid": {
+			"version": "8.3.2",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/uuid/-/uuid-8.3.2.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-+NYs2QeMWy+GWFOEm9xnn6HCDp0l7QBD7ml8zLUmJ+93Q5NF0NocErnwkTkXVFNiX3/fpC6afS8Dhb/gz7R7eg==",
+			"license": "MIT",
+			"bin": {
+				"uuid": "dist/bin/uuid"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/js-yaml": {
 			"version": "4.1.0",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/js-yaml/-/js-yaml-4.1.0.tgz",
@@ -12461,7 +13339,6 @@
 			"version": "4.6.2",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/lodash.merge/-/lodash.merge-4.6.2.tgz",
 			"integrity": "sha512-0KpjqXRVvrYyCsX1swR/XTK0va6VQkQM6MNo7PqW77ByjAhoARA8EfrP1N4+KlKj8YS0ZUCtRT/YUuhyYDujIQ==",
-			"dev": true,
 			"license": "MIT"
 		},
 		"node_modules/lodash.startcase": {
@@ -12707,6 +13584,15 @@
 				"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/isaacs"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/minimist": {
+			"version": "1.2.8",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/minimist/-/minimist-1.2.8.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-2yyAR8qBkN3YuheJanUpWC5U3bb5osDywNB8RzDVlDwDHbocAJveqqj1u8+SVD7jkWT4yvsHCpWqqWqAxb0zCA==",
+			"license": "MIT",
+			"funding": {
+				"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/minipass": {
 			"version": "7.1.2",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/minipass/-/minipass-7.1.2.tgz",
@@ -12941,6 +13827,12 @@
 				"node": ">=10"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/module-details-from-path": {
+			"version": "1.0.3",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/module-details-from-path/-/module-details-from-path-1.0.3.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-ySViT69/76t8VhE1xXHK6Ch4NcDd26gx0MzKXLO+F7NOtnqH68d9zF94nT8ZWSxXh8ELOERsnJO/sWt1xZYw5A==",
+			"license": "MIT"
+		},
 		"node_modules/monaco-vscode-textmate-theme-converter": {
 			"version": "0.1.7",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/monaco-vscode-textmate-theme-converter/-/monaco-vscode-textmate-theme-converter-0.1.7.tgz",
@@ -13071,6 +13963,12 @@
 				}
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/node-int64": {
+			"version": "0.4.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/node-int64/-/node-int64-0.4.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-O5lz91xSOeoXP6DulyHfllpq+Eg00MWitZIbtPfoSEvqIHdl5gfcY6hYzDWnj0qD5tz52PI08u9qUvSVeUBeHw==",
+			"license": "MIT"
+		},
 		"node_modules/normalize-package-data": {
 			"version": "2.5.0",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/normalize-package-data/-/normalize-package-data-2.5.0.tgz",
@@ -13499,6 +14397,15 @@
 				"undici-types": "~5.26.4"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/opentracing": {
+			"version": "0.14.7",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/opentracing/-/opentracing-0.14.7.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-vz9iS7MJ5+Bp1URw8Khvdyw1H/hGvzHWlKQ7eRrQojSCDL1/SrWfrY9QebLw97n2deyRtzHRC3MkQfVNUCo91Q==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=0.10"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/option": {
 			"version": "0.2.4",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/option/-/option-0.2.4.tgz",
@@ -13909,7 +14816,6 @@
 			"version": "1.0.7",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/path-parse/-/path-parse-1.0.7.tgz",
 			"integrity": "sha512-LDJzPVEEEPR+y48z93A0Ed0yXb8pAByGWo/k5YYdYgpY2/2EsOsksJrq7lOHxryrVOn1ejG6oAp8ahvOIQD8sw==",
-			"dev": true,
 			"license": "MIT"
 		},
 		"node_modules/path-scurry": {
@@ -14100,6 +15006,14 @@
 				"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/sindresorhus"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/process": {
+			"version": "0.10.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/process/-/process-0.10.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-dyIett8dgGIZ/TXKUzeYExt7WA6ldDzys9vTDU/cCA9L17Ypme+KzS+NjQCjpn9xsvi/shbMC+yP/BcFMBz0NA==",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">= 0.6.0"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/process-nextick-args": {
 			"version": "2.0.1",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/process-nextick-args/-/process-nextick-args-2.0.1.tgz",
@@ -14450,11 +15364,24 @@
 				"node": ">=0.10.0"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/require-in-the-middle": {
+			"version": "7.5.2",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/require-in-the-middle/-/require-in-the-middle-7.5.2.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-gAZ+kLqBdHarXB64XpAe2VCjB7rIRv+mU8tfRWziHRJ5umKsIHN2tLLv6EtMw7WCdP19S0ERVMldNvxYCHnhSQ==",
+			"license": "MIT",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"debug": "^4.3.5",
+				"module-details-from-path": "^1.0.3",
+				"resolve": "^1.22.8"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=8.6.0"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/resolve": {
 			"version": "1.22.8",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/resolve/-/resolve-1.22.8.tgz",
 			"integrity": "sha512-oKWePCxqpd6FlLvGV1VU0x7bkPmmCNolxzjMf4NczoDnQcIWrAF+cPtZn5i6n+RfD2d9i0tzpKnG6Yk168yIyw==",
-			"dev": true,
 			"license": "MIT",
 			"dependencies": {
 				"is-core-module": "^2.13.0",
@@ -14852,6 +15779,12 @@
 				"url": "https://github.com/sponsors/ljharb"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/shimmer": {
+			"version": "1.2.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/shimmer/-/shimmer-1.2.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-sQTKC1Re/rM6XyFM6fIAGHRPVGvyXfgzIDvzoq608vM+jeyVD0Tu1E6Np0Kc2zAIFWIj963V2800iF/9LPieQw==",
+			"license": "BSD-2-Clause"
+		},
 		"node_modules/should": {
 			"version": "13.2.3",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/should/-/should-13.2.3.tgz",
@@ -15214,6 +16147,11 @@
 				"safe-buffer": "~5.1.0"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/string-template": {
+			"version": "0.2.1",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string-template/-/string-template-0.2.1.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-Yptehjogou2xm4UJbxJ4CxgZx12HBfeystp0y3x7s4Dj32ltVVG1Gg8YhKjHZkHicuKpZX/ffilA8505VbUbpw=="
+		},
 		"node_modules/string-width": {
 			"version": "5.1.2",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/string-width/-/string-width-5.1.2.tgz",
@@ -15437,7 +16375,6 @@
 			"version": "1.0.0",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/supports-preserve-symlinks-flag/-/supports-preserve-symlinks-flag-1.0.0.tgz",
 			"integrity": "sha512-ot0WnXS9fgdkgIcePe6RHNk1WA8+muPa6cSjeR3V8K27q9BB1rTE3R1p7Hv0z1ZyAc8s6Vvv8DIyWf681MAt0w==",
-			"dev": true,
 			"license": "MIT",
 			"engines": {
 				"node": ">= 0.4"
@@ -15571,6 +16508,31 @@
 			"dev": true,
 			"license": "MIT"
 		},
+		"node_modules/thriftrw": {
+			"version": "3.11.4",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/thriftrw/-/thriftrw-3.11.4.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-UcuBd3eanB3T10nXWRRMwfwoaC6VMk7qe3/5YIWP2Jtw+EbHqJ0p1/K3x8ixiR5dozKSSfcg1W+0e33G1Di3XA==",
+			"dependencies": {
+				"bufrw": "^1.2.1",
+				"error": "7.0.2",
+				"long": "^2.4.0"
+			},
+			"bin": {
+				"thrift2json": "thrift2json.js"
+			},
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">= 0.10.x"
+			}
+		},
+		"node_modules/thriftrw/node_modules/long": {
+			"version": "2.4.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/long/-/long-2.4.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-ijUtjmO/n2A5PaosNG9ZGDsQ3vxJg7ZW8vsY8Kp0f2yIZWhSJvjmegV7t+9RPQKxKrvj8yKGehhS+po14hPLGQ==",
+			"license": "Apache-2.0",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=0.6"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/through": {
 			"version": "2.3.8",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/through/-/through-2.3.8.tgz",
@@ -16404,6 +17366,21 @@
 				"node": ">=4.0"
 			}
 		},
+		"node_modules/xorshift": {
+			"version": "1.2.0",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/xorshift/-/xorshift-1.2.0.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-iYgNnGyeeJ4t6U11NpA/QiKy+PXn5Aa3Azg5qkwIFz1tBLllQrjjsk9yzD7IAK0naNU4JxdeDgqW9ov4u/hc4g==",
+			"license": "MIT"
+		},
+		"node_modules/xtend": {
+			"version": "4.0.2",
+			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/xtend/-/xtend-4.0.2.tgz",
+			"integrity": "sha512-LKYU1iAXJXUgAXn9URjiu+MWhyUXHsvfp7mcuYm9dSUKK0/CjtrUwFAxD82/mCWbtLsGjFIad0wIsod4zrTAEQ==",
+			"license": "MIT",
+			"engines": {
+				"node": ">=0.4"
+			}
+		},
 		"node_modules/y18n": {
 			"version": "5.0.8",
 			"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/y18n/-/y18n-5.0.8.tgz",
diff --git a/package.json b/package.json
index 0d0f074a49e..5d5c5c7648c 100644
--- a/package.json
+++ b/package.json
@@ -211,6 +211,11 @@
 					"type": "boolean",
 					"default": true,
 					"description": "Controls whether the MCP Marketplace is enabled."
+				},
+				"cline.conversationTelemetry": {
+					"type": "boolean",
+					"default": false,
+					"description": "Share message data,  code, and more extensive telemetry. This data may be used to improve prompts used in Cline, train models, and understand failure states more accurately."
 				}
 			}
 		}
@@ -272,6 +277,12 @@
 		"@google/generative-ai": "^0.18.0",
 		"@mistralai/mistralai": "^1.5.0",
 		"@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "^1.7.0",
+		"@opentelemetry/api": "^1.4.1",
+		"@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http": "^0.39.1",
+		"@opentelemetry/resources": "^1.30.1",
+		"@opentelemetry/sdk-node": "^0.39.1",
+		"@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node": "^1.30.1",
+		"@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions": "^1.30.0",
 		"@types/clone-deep": "^4.0.4",
 		"@types/get-folder-size": "^3.0.4",
 		"@types/pdf-parse": "^1.1.4",
diff --git a/src/core/Cline.ts b/src/core/Cline.ts
index 7d7040ad91f..c18f01fca21 100644
--- a/src/core/Cline.ts
+++ b/src/core/Cline.ts
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ import { ClineHandler } from "../api/providers/cline"
 import { ClineProvider } from "./webview/ClineProvider"
 import { DEFAULT_LANGUAGE_SETTINGS, getLanguageKey, LanguageDisplay, LanguageKey } from "../shared/Languages"
 import { telemetryService } from "../services/telemetry/TelemetryService"
+import { ConversationTelemetryService, TelemetryChatMessage } from "../services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService"
 import pTimeout from "p-timeout"
 import { GlobalFileNames } from "../global-constants"
 
@@ -1349,6 +1350,24 @@ export class Cline {
 			)
 		}
 
+		// Capture system prompt for telemetry,
+		// ONLY if user is opted in, in advanced settings
+		if (this.providerRef.deref()?.conversationTelemetryService.isOptedInToConversationTelemetry()) {
+			const systemMessage: TelemetryChatMessage = {
+				role: "system",
+				content: systemPrompt,
+				ts: Date.now(), // we dont uniquely identify system messages, so we use the timestamp as the id
+			}
+
+			// no need for timeout here, as there's no timestamp to compare to
+			this.providerRef.deref()?.conversationTelemetryService.captureMessage(this.taskId, systemMessage, {
+				apiProvider: this.apiProvider,
+				model: this.api.getModel().id,
+				tokensIn: 0,
+				tokensOut: 0,
+			})
+		}
+
 		// If the previous API request's total token usage is close to the context window, truncate the conversation history to free up space for the new request
 		if (previousApiReqIndex >= 0) {
 			const previousRequest = this.clineMessages[previousApiReqIndex]
@@ -3165,6 +3184,39 @@ export class Cline {
 
 		telemetryService.captureConversationTurnEvent(this.taskId, this.apiProvider, this.api.getModel().id, "user")
 
+		// Capture message data for telemetry,
+		// ONLY if user is opted in, in advanced settings
+		if (this.providerRef.deref()?.conversationTelemetryService.isOptedInToConversationTelemetry()) {
+			// Get the last message from apiConversationHistory
+			const lastMessage = this.apiConversationHistory[this.apiConversationHistory.length - 1]
+
+			// Get the corresponding timestamp from clineMessages
+			// The last message in clineMessages should be the one we just added
+
+			const lastClineMessage = this.clineMessages[this.clineMessages.length - 1]
+			const ts = lastClineMessage.ts
+
+			// Send individual message to telemetry
+			this.providerRef.deref()?.conversationTelemetryService.captureMessage(
+				this.taskId,
+				// Add the timestamp to the message object for telemetry
+				{
+					...lastMessage,
+					ts,
+				},
+				{
+					apiProvider: this.apiProvider,
+					model: this.api.getModel().id,
+					tokensIn: 0,
+					tokensOut: 0,
+				},
+			)
+
+			// Send entire conversation history to cleanup endpoint
+			// This ensures deleted messages are properly handled in telemetry
+			this.providerRef.deref()?.conversationTelemetryService.cleanupTask(this.taskId, this.clineMessages)
+		}
+
 		// since we sent off a placeholder api_req_started message to update the webview while waiting to actually start the API request (to load potential details for example), we need to update the text of that message
 		const lastApiReqIndex = findLastIndex(this.clineMessages, (m) => m.say === "api_req_started")
 		this.clineMessages[lastApiReqIndex].text = JSON.stringify({
@@ -3242,6 +3294,36 @@ export class Cline {
 
 				telemetryService.captureConversationTurnEvent(this.taskId, this.apiProvider, this.api.getModel().id, "assistant")
 
+				// Capture message data for telemetry after assistant response
+				// ONLY if user is opted in, in advanced settings
+				if (this.providerRef.deref()?.conversationTelemetryService.isOptedInToConversationTelemetry()) {
+					// Get the last message from apiConversationHistory
+					const lastMessage = this.apiConversationHistory[this.apiConversationHistory.length - 1]
+
+					// Find the corresponding timestamp from clineMessages
+					// For assistant messages, we need to find the most recent "text" message
+					const lastTextMessage = findLast(this.clineMessages, (m) => m.say === "text")
+
+					// Add the timestamp to the message object for telemetry
+					if (!lastTextMessage) {
+						console.error("No text message found in clineMessages")
+					} else {
+						this.providerRef.deref()?.conversationTelemetryService.captureMessage(
+							this.taskId,
+							{
+								...lastMessage,
+								ts: lastTextMessage.ts,
+							},
+							{
+								apiProvider: this.apiProvider,
+								model: this.api.getModel().id,
+								tokensIn: inputTokens,
+								tokensOut: outputTokens,
+							},
+						)
+					}
+				}
+
 				// signals to provider that it can retrieve the saved messages from disk, as abortTask can not be awaited on in nature
 				this.didFinishAbortingStream = true
 			}
@@ -3391,6 +3473,32 @@ export class Cline {
 					content: [{ type: "text", text: assistantMessage }],
 				})
 
+				// Capture message data for telemetry after assistant response,
+				// ONLY if user is opted in, in advanced settings
+				if (this.providerRef.deref()?.conversationTelemetryService.isOptedInToConversationTelemetry()) {
+					// Get the last message from apiConversationHistory
+					const lastMessage = this.apiConversationHistory[this.apiConversationHistory.length - 1]
+
+					// Find the corresponding timestamp from clineMessages
+					const lastClineMessage = this.clineMessages[this.clineMessages.length - 1]
+
+					if (lastClineMessage) {
+						this.providerRef.deref()?.conversationTelemetryService.captureMessage(
+							this.taskId,
+							{
+								...lastMessage,
+								ts: lastClineMessage.ts,
+							},
+							{
+								apiProvider: this.apiProvider,
+								model: this.api.getModel().id,
+								tokensIn: inputTokens,
+								tokensOut: outputTokens,
+							},
+						)
+					}
+				}
+
 				// NOTE: this comment is here for future reference - this was a workaround for userMessageContent not getting set to true. It was due to it not recursively calling for partial blocks when didRejectTool, so it would get stuck waiting for a partial block to complete before it could continue.
 				// in case the content blocks finished
 				// it may be the api stream finished after the last parsed content block was executed, so  we are able to detect out of bounds and set userMessageContentReady to true (note you should not call presentAssistantMessage since if the last block is completed it will be presented again)
diff --git a/src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts b/src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts
index 0ab08d72b57..9df10ea90e0 100644
--- a/src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts
+++ b/src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ import { TelemetrySetting } from "../../shared/TelemetrySetting"
 import { cleanupLegacyCheckpoints } from "../../integrations/checkpoints/CheckpointMigration"
 import CheckpointTracker from "../../integrations/checkpoints/CheckpointTracker"
 import { getTotalTasksSize } from "../../utils/storage"
+import { ConversationTelemetryService } from "../../services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService"
 import { GlobalFileNames } from "../../global-constants"
 
 /*
@@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ export class ClineProvider implements vscode.WebviewViewProvider {
 	workspaceTracker?: WorkspaceTracker
 	mcpHub?: McpHub
 	private latestAnnouncementId = "feb-19-2025" // update to some unique identifier when we add a new announcement
+	conversationTelemetryService: ConversationTelemetryService
 
 	constructor(
 		readonly context: vscode.ExtensionContext,
@@ -130,6 +132,7 @@ export class ClineProvider implements vscode.WebviewViewProvider {
 		ClineProvider.activeInstances.add(this)
 		this.workspaceTracker = new WorkspaceTracker(this)
 		this.mcpHub = new McpHub(this)
+		this.conversationTelemetryService = new ConversationTelemetryService(this)
 
 		// Clean up legacy checkpoints
 		cleanupLegacyCheckpoints(this.context.globalStorageUri.fsPath, this.outputChannel).catch((error) => {
@@ -160,6 +163,7 @@ export class ClineProvider implements vscode.WebviewViewProvider {
 		this.workspaceTracker = undefined
 		this.mcpHub?.dispose()
 		this.mcpHub = undefined
+		this.conversationTelemetryService.shutdown()
 		this.outputChannel.appendLine("Disposed all disposables")
 		ClineProvider.activeInstances.delete(this)
 	}
diff --git a/src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts b/src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..801a79ce725
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+import { context, SpanKind, trace } from "@opentelemetry/api"
+import { OTLPTraceExporter } from "@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http"
+import { Resource } from "@opentelemetry/resources"
+import { SimpleSpanProcessor } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base"
+import { NodeTracerProvider } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node"
+import { ATTR_SERVICE_NAME, ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION } from "@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions"
+import { Anthropic } from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"
+import * as vscode from "vscode"
+import { ClineProvider } from "../../core/webview/ClineProvider"
+
+export type TelemetryChatMessage = {
+	role: "user" | "assistant" | "system"
+	ts: number
+	content: Anthropic.Messages.MessageParam["content"]
+}
+
+const { IS_DEV } = process.env
+
+interface ConversationMetadata {
+	apiProvider?: string
+	model?: string
+	tokensIn: number
+	tokensOut: number
+}
+
+/**
+ * Service for collecting conversation data using OpenTelemetry
+ */
+export class ConversationTelemetryService {
+	private providerRef: WeakRef<ClineProvider>
+	private distinctId: string = vscode.env.machineId
+	private apiEndpoint: string = "https://api.cline.bot/v1/traces"
+	private tracerProvider: NodeTracerProvider | undefined
+	private tracer: any
+	private messageIndices: Map<string, number> = new Map()
+
+	constructor(provider: ClineProvider) {
+		this.providerRef = new WeakRef(provider)
+		this.initializeTracer()
+	}
+
+	private async getClineApiKey(): Promise<string | undefined> {
+		const provider = this.providerRef.deref()
+		if (!provider) {
+			return undefined
+		}
+		const { apiConfiguration } = await provider.getStateToPostToWebview()
+		return apiConfiguration?.clineApiKey
+	}
+
+	public isOptedInToConversationTelemetry(): boolean {
+		// First check global telemetry level - telemetry should only be enabled when level is "all"
+		const telemetryLevel = vscode.workspace.getConfiguration("telemetry").get<string>("telemetryLevel", "all")
+		const isGlobalTelemetryEnabled = telemetryLevel === "all"
+
+		// User has to manually opt in to conversation telemetry in Advanced Settings
+		const isConversationTelemetryEnabled =
+			vscode.workspace.getConfiguration("cline").get<boolean>("conversationTelemetry") ?? false
+
+		// Currently only enabled in dev environment
+		const isDevEnvironment = !!IS_DEV
+
+		return isDevEnvironment && isGlobalTelemetryEnabled && isConversationTelemetryEnabled
+	}
+
+	private async initializeTracer() {
+		try {
+			// Create a resource that identifies our service
+			const resource = new Resource({
+				[ATTR_SERVICE_NAME]: "cline-extension",
+				[ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION]: "1.0.0",
+			})
+
+			const clineApiKey = await this.getClineApiKey()
+
+			console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] Initializing OpenTelemetry tracer...")
+
+			// Configure the OTLP exporter
+			const headers: Record<string, string> = {
+				"Content-Type": "application/json",
+			}
+
+			// Add API key to headers if available
+			if (clineApiKey) {
+				headers["Authorization"] = `Bearer ${clineApiKey}`
+			}
+
+			const exporter = new OTLPTraceExporter({
+				url: this.apiEndpoint,
+				headers,
+			})
+
+			// Create the span processor
+			const spanProcessor = new SimpleSpanProcessor(exporter as any)
+
+			// Create the trace provider with the span processor in the config
+			this.tracerProvider = new NodeTracerProvider({
+				resource,
+				spanProcessors: [spanProcessor as any],
+			})
+
+			// Register the provider
+			this.tracerProvider.register()
+
+			// Get a tracer
+			this.tracer = trace.getTracer("cline-conversation-tracer")
+
+			console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] OpenTelemetry tracer initialized successfully")
+		} catch (error) {
+			console.error("[ConversationTelemetry] Failed to initialize OpenTelemetry tracer:", error)
+		}
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Captures a message in the conversation as an OpenTelemetry span
+	 * ONLY HAPPENS IF USER IS OPTED INTO CONVERSATION TELEMETRY IN ADVANCED SETTINGS
+	 */
+	public async captureMessage(taskId: string, message: TelemetryChatMessage, metadata: ConversationMetadata) {
+		// Do NOT capture message if user has not explicitly opted in
+		if (!this.isOptedInToConversationTelemetry()) {
+			return
+		}
+
+		if (!this.tracer) {
+			return
+		}
+
+		try {
+			// Convert taskId to a valid trace ID (must be 32 hex chars)
+			const traceId = this.generateTraceIdFromTimestamp(taskId)
+
+			// Convert message timestamp to a valid span ID (must be 16 hex chars)
+			if (!message.ts && message.ts !== 0) {
+				throw new Error("Message timestamp is required")
+			}
+
+			const timestamp = message.ts
+			const spanId = this.generateSpanIdFromTimestamp(timestamp)
+
+			// Create a span context with our IDs
+			const spanContext = trace.setSpanContext(context.active(), {
+				traceId,
+				spanId,
+				isRemote: false,
+				traceFlags: 1, // Sampled
+			})
+
+			// Start a new span with the context
+			const span = this.tracer.startSpan(
+				`message.${message.role}`,
+				{
+					kind: SpanKind.CLIENT,
+					startTime: this.millisecondsToHrTime(timestamp), // Convert to nanoseconds
+				},
+				spanContext,
+			)
+
+			// Get the message index for this task
+			const messageIndex = this.getNextMessageIndex(taskId)
+
+			// Add attributes to the span
+			span.setAttribute("task.id", taskId)
+			span.setAttribute("user.id", this.distinctId)
+			span.setAttribute("message.role", message.role)
+			span.setAttribute("message.timestamp", timestamp)
+			span.setAttribute("message.index", messageIndex)
+
+			const c = message.content
+
+			// Add Braintrust-compatible attributes
+			span.setAttribute("gen_ai.request.model", metadata.model)
+
+			if (message.role === "user") {
+				span.setAttribute("gen_ai.prompt", this.extractContent(message))
+			} else if (message.role === "assistant") {
+				span.setAttribute("gen_ai.completion", this.extractContent(message))
+				span.setAttribute("gen_ai.usage.prompt_tokens", metadata.tokensIn)
+				span.setAttribute("gen_ai.usage.completion_tokens", metadata.tokensOut)
+			} else if (message.role === "system") {
+				span.setAttribute("gen_ai.system_prompt", this.extractContent(message))
+			}
+
+			// Add custom metadata in Braintrust format
+			span.setAttribute("braintrust.metadata.api_provider", metadata.apiProvider)
+			span.setAttribute("braintrust.metadata.ts", message.ts)
+
+			// End the span immediately since messages are discrete events
+			span.end(this.millisecondsToHrTime(timestamp)) // Convert to nanoseconds
+
+			console.log(`[ConversationTelemetry] Captured ${message.role} message for task ${taskId}`, { span })
+		} catch (error) {
+			console.error("[ConversationTelemetry] Error capturing message:", error)
+		}
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Convert a decimal timestamp to a valid trace ID (32 hex chars)
+	 */
+	private generateTraceIdFromTimestamp(timestamp: string): string {
+		// Pad with zeros and convert to hex
+		const hex = BigInt(timestamp).toString(16).padStart(32, "0")
+		return hex.substring(0, 32) // Ensure it's exactly 32 chars
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Converts milliseconds to high-resolution time format expected by OpenTelemetry
+	 * Returns [seconds, nanoseconds]
+	 */
+	private millisecondsToHrTime(milliseconds: number): [number, number] {
+		return [
+			Math.floor(milliseconds / 1000), // seconds
+			(milliseconds % 1000) * 1000000, // nanoseconds (remainder in ms * 10^6)
+		]
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Convert a decimal timestamp to a valid span ID (16 hex chars)
+	 */
+	private generateSpanIdFromTimestamp(timestamp: number): string {
+		// Pad with zeros and convert to hex
+		const hex = BigInt(timestamp).toString(16).padStart(16, "0")
+		return hex.substring(0, 16) // Ensure it's exactly 16 chars
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Helper to extract content from different message formats
+	 */
+	private extractContent(message: TelemetryChatMessage): string {
+		if (typeof message.content === "string") {
+			return message.content
+		}
+
+		return message.content
+			.map((block) => (block.type === "text" ? block.text : null))
+			.filter(Boolean)
+			.join("\n")
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Track message indices per task
+	 */
+	private getNextMessageIndex(taskId: string): number {
+		const currentIndex = this.messageIndices.get(taskId) || 0
+		this.messageIndices.set(taskId, currentIndex + 1)
+		return currentIndex
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Sends conversation data to cleanup endpoint to remove deleted messages from telemetry
+	 * ONLY HAPPENS IF USER IS OPTED INTO CONVERSATION TELEMETRY IN ADVANCED SETTINGS
+	 */
+	public async cleanupTask(taskId: string, conversationData: any): Promise<void> {
+		// Do NOT send data if user has not explicitly opted in
+		if (!this.isOptedInToConversationTelemetry()) {
+			return
+		}
+
+		const clineApiKey = await this.getClineApiKey()
+		if (!clineApiKey) {
+			return
+		}
+
+		try {
+			// Configure the headers with API key
+			const headers: Record<string, string> = {
+				"Content-Type": "application/json",
+			}
+
+			// Add API key to headers
+			headers["Authorization"] = `Bearer ${clineApiKey}`
+
+			// Send the data to the cleanup endpoint
+			const cleanupEndpoint = `${this.apiEndpoint.replace("/traces", "/traces/cleanup")}`
+
+			// Use fetch API to send the data
+			const response = await fetch(cleanupEndpoint, {
+				method: "POST",
+				headers,
+				body: JSON.stringify({
+					taskId: taskId,
+					conversationData,
+					userId: this.distinctId,
+				}),
+			})
+
+			if (!response.ok) {
+				throw new Error(`Failed to send cleanup data: ${response.status} ${response.statusText}`)
+			}
+
+			console.log(`[ConversationTelemetry] Cleanup data sent for task ${taskId}`)
+		} catch (error) {
+			console.error("[ConversationTelemetry] Error sending cleanup data:", error)
+		}
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Shutdown the tracer provider
+	 */
+	public async shutdown(): Promise<void> {
+		if (this.tracerProvider) {
+			await this.tracerProvider.shutdown()
+		}
+	}
+}


Reviews:
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 7bc5ff750976b797ab1976c6f3c276bbfe00f126 in <ellipsistime>3 minutes and 0 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `599` lines of code in `10` files
 - Skipped `1` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `15` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:123</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Double-check the conversion of task IDs to trace IDs and message timestamps to span IDs. Ensure unique and valid IDs to avoid collisions in tracing.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the PR author to double-check the conversion process and ensure unique and valid IDs. This falls under the rule of not asking the author to double-check or ensure behavior, which is not allowed.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>src/shared/TelemetrySetting.ts:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
TelemetrySetting and ConversationDataSetting types are straightforward. Ensure these types remain consistent across the codebase.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the PR author to ensure consistency across the codebase, which is similar to asking them to double-check or verify something. This violates the rule against asking the author to ensure or verify things.

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/shared/WebviewMessage.ts:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The WebviewMessage interface is comprehensive. Verify that all consumers properly handle each message type defined here.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:135</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In handleSubmit, multiple postMessage calls are made for updating settings. Ensure the webview consumes these messages in the expected order and updates state accordingly.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:163</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The conversationDataSetting checkbox is implemented similarly to telemetrySetting. Confirm that the UI and backend correctly reflect user preferences and that privacy details are clearly communicated.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the PR author to confirm that the UI and backend reflect user preferences and that privacy details are communicated. This falls under asking the author to ensure behavior is intended and tested, which violates the rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>webview-ui/src/context/ExtensionStateContext.tsx:142</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Ensure that state updates for conversationDataSetting and other settings are synchronized with the webview. Verify that downstream consumers react to these state changes appropriately.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>webview-ui/src/context/ExtensionStateContext.tsx:130</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider providing a specific TypeScript type for the 'theme' instead of 'any' to improve type safety when converting TextMate themes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>src/extension.ts:40</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Telemetry settings are merged with conversationDataSetting. Ensure that secret handling for 'clineApiKey' passed to telemetryService remains secure and that keys are managed safely.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the author to ensure that secret handling remains secure, which is a form of asking for confirmation or verification. This violates the rule against asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or tested.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>src/extension.ts:227</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The development file watcher reloads the window on file changes. Ensure that this mechanism is excluded from production builds so sensitive state is not exposed and performance is optimized.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>10. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:101</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Ensure that the 'taskId' (used as input for generateTraceIdFromTimestamp) is a valid numeric timestamp string. This is critical since the trace ID is derived from it; otherwise, there may be collisions or inconsistency in tracing.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment raises a valid concern - if taskId isn't actually a timestamp string, the BigInt conversion could fail or produce invalid trace IDs. However, the comment is phrased as "Ensure that..." which violates our rules about not asking for verification. Additionally, without seeing how taskId is generated/used elsewhere, we can't be certain this is actually an issue.
I might be too focused on the implementation details and missing the bigger picture - perhaps taskId is guaranteed to be a valid timestamp by the system design. Also, the BigInt conversion might handle non-timestamp strings gracefully.
While the concern about trace ID validity is legitimate, the "Ensure that..." phrasing makes this a verification request rather than an actionable comment. Additionally, we lack context about taskId's guarantees.
Delete this comment because it violates the rule about verification requests ("Ensure that...") and we don't have enough context to be certain there's an actual issue.

</details>

<details>
<summary>11. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:143</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider validating 'conversationDataSetting' similarly to 'telemetrySetting' before sending it via postMessage. This helps maintain consistency in user settings validation.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `50%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>12. <code>src/extension.ts:36</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Telemetry initialization and state update logic (for both telemetrySetting and conversationDataSetting) appears sound. Ensure these settings are well documented so users understand what data is collected.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `50%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>13. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:265</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The switch-case in the webview message listener is quite extensive. For improved readability and maintainability, consider refactoring some of these cases into separate handler functions.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>14. <code>webview-ui/src/context/ExtensionStateContext.tsx:106</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the 'state' message handling block, the code directly assumes that 'message.state' exists. Consider adding a null-check or default fallback to protect against an undefined state.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `50%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>15. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:97</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Review the type definitions (e.g. ClineMessage and ExtensionState) to ensure that new fields like 'conversationDataSetting' are consistently handled across the codebase.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `40%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_ddhJNPeHT0ayGVSY`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T02:34:52Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on a6cb18ed8d496df572ca90d4f6f87cd1945b93b4 in <ellipsistime>4 minutes and 21 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `3866` lines of code in `57` files
 - Skipped `1` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `47` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/shared/errors.ts:6</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
This class is clear and concise. Consider adding JSDoc tags for each property in 'details' to assist future maintainers.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The properties are fairly self-explanatory from their names and types. The class-level JSDoc already explains the purpose. The types are explicit in TypeScript. Adding property-level JSDoc would be nice-to-have but not critical. This feels like a "purely informative" comment that doesn't indicate a clear code change requirement.
The properties might have non-obvious implications or constraints that would benefit from documentation. TypeScript types don't always capture semantic meaning.
While additional docs could be helpful, the comment doesn't identify any specific unclear aspects that need explanation. The TypeScript types combined with the class-level doc provide sufficient clarity for this error case.
Delete the comment as it's purely informative and doesn't identify a clear issue requiring changes.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>src/utils/content-size.test.ts:11</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Good tests for token estimation and file size checks. Consider adding edge cases for non-standard context values.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The tests already cover key scenarios: normal cases, boundary cases (partial tokens), large files exceeding limits, and error conditions. While more edge cases could always be added, the existing coverage seems reasonable. The comment doesn't specify what edge cases are missing or why they're important. Without seeing content-size.ts, we can't be sure what edge cases would be valuable.
I might be underestimating the importance of testing extreme context values. There could be important edge cases around zero or negative context values that aren't covered.
While those edge cases might be worth testing, without seeing the implementation file, we can't be confident these cases are actually important or even valid inputs. The tests already cover the main scenarios.
Delete the comment. While more tests could be added, the comment is too vague and the existing test coverage appears reasonable for a new file.

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/utils/content-size.ts:62</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The switch-case for calculating max allowed size is clear. Add a comment explaining why a subtraction is used versus a percentage fallback.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking for an explanation of a specific code decision, which is not allowed by the rules. It doesn't suggest a specific code change or improvement, nor does it point out a potential issue with the code. Therefore, it should be removed.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>src/utils/fs.test.ts:38</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Tests for createDirectoriesForFile are comprehensive. Consider asserting that the directories are in the expected order (topmost missing to target).
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>src/utils/fs.ts:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The createDirectoriesForFile function properly normalizes paths and creates missing directories. Verify that fileExistsAtPath handles symlinks if necessary.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>webview-ui/package.json:4</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version is set to 0.3.0. Ensure this version aligns with your release strategy.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>webview-ui/src/components/chat/ChatRow.tsx:87</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider adding handling or documentation for checkpoint-related message types; commented out code suggests further review may be needed.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>webview-ui/src/components/common/TelemetryBanner.tsx:30</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
TelemetryBanner implementation is neat. Verify that the inline type assertion 'satisfies TelemetrySetting' complies with your type-checking conventions.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is asking the PR author to verify compliance with type-checking conventions, which is similar to asking them to double-check or ensure something. This violates the rule against asking the author to confirm or ensure behavior. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a clear issue.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>webview-ui/src/components/history/HistoryView.tsx:27</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Fuzzy search using Fuse is well implemented. Consider extracting style constants into a shared theme file for maintainability.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
The styles are very basic - just padding and a border using VSCode theme variables. They're not complex enough to warrant extraction. The style is only used once in this component. Moving it to a theme file would add complexity without much benefit. Theme files are more useful for complex, reused styles or design system constants.
Perhaps having consistent padding/spacing values across components would improve UI consistency? The border style could potentially be reused elsewhere.
While consistency is good, these are very simple styles using VSCode's built-in theme variables. The overhead of maintaining a separate theme file for such basic styles would outweigh the benefits.
Delete this comment. The suggestion to extract these simple, one-off styles into a theme file would add unnecessary complexity without providing significant value.

</details>

<details>
<summary>10. <code>webview-ui/src/components/mcp/McpView.tsx:79</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Good conditional rendering of tabs based on marketplace enablement. Ensure that TabButton styling remains consistent in various themes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>11. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/ApiOptions.tsx:148</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The workaround for VSCodeDropdown bug is well documented. Ensure unique prop names and IDs when multiple dropdowns are rendered concurrently.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>12. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/OpenRouterModelPicker.tsx:29</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Model search functionality using Fuse is robust. Consider adding ARIA labels on dropdown items to improve accessibility.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>13. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:44</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The 'handleSubmit' function conditionally posts settings. Logging validation errors during development may help even if commented out in production.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is purely informative, suggesting logging validation errors during development. It doesn't provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a test to be written. It doesn't align with the rules for good comments.

</details>

<details>
<summary>14. <code>webview-ui/src/components/welcome/WelcomeView.tsx:60</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider providing alternate text for the Cline logo in case the image fails to load, even if using base64 encoding.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>15. <code>webview-ui/src/context/ExtensionStateContext.tsx:140</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The context provider handles incoming messages well. Ensure that state updates for 'partialMessage' remain performant with large messages.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>16. <code>webview-ui/src/index.css:130</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
CSS for dropdowns and scrollbar styles is comprehensive. Consider refactoring repeated values into CSS custom properties for maintainability.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>17. <code>webview-ui/vite.config.ts:37</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The Vite configuration is clean. Verify that the 'process.env' definitions align with your deployment pipeline.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>18. <code>src/shared/errors.ts:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The error class ContentTooLargeError is straightforward and well documented. Consider adding more details or examples in the docs on how to handle such errors.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment suggests adding more details or examples in the documentation, which is purely informative and not a specific code suggestion or issue. It doesn't align with the rules for good comments.

</details>

<details>
<summary>19. <code>src/utils/content-size.test.ts:27</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Tests for content-size functions cover both string and buffer inputs. It would be beneficial to also assert that the error thrown for non-existent files is of a more specific type if applicable.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50%
The test is new code, so this is about a change. The comment has a point - checking for a generic Error is less specific than we could be. However, we don't know what specific error type fs.stat() throws without checking Node.js docs, and the test's purpose (documented in the comment) is just to verify error handling exists at all. The current assertion is sufficient for that purpose.
I might be undervaluing the importance of specific error type checking. More specific assertions could catch API changes that break error handling.
While more specific assertions could be valuable, suggesting them requires knowledge of fs.stat()'s error types. Without that context, the comment isn't actionable enough.
Delete the comment. While it suggests a valid improvement, it's not specific enough to be actionable without additional research.

</details>

<details>
<summary>20. <code>src/utils/content-size.ts:60</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The default branch in getMaxAllowedSize (using Math.max(contextWindow - 40000, contextWindow * 0.8)) could use additional comments explaining the choice of these numbers for clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The function already has clear comments for the known model cases. The default case uses a formula that seems more arbitrary, and understanding why these specific values (40000 and 0.8) were chosen could be helpful for future maintenance. However, this is a relatively minor documentation request that doesn't affect functionality, and the code is still understandable without it.
The comment is purely informational and doesn't indicate a clear code change is required. The existing code is functional and reasonably documented already.
While additional documentation could be helpful, our rules specifically state not to make purely informative comments and to only comment when there is clearly a code change required.
The comment should be deleted as it violates our rule about making purely informative comments without requiring clear code changes.

</details>

<details>
<summary>21. <code>src/utils/fs.ts:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Using a while loop with fileExistsAtPath is fine; just ensure that fileExistsAtPath is reliably available, ideally by placing its definition before using it in the file (although function declarations are hoisted in modules).
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>22. <code>webview-ui/package.json:14</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Dependencies and devDependencies look standard. Verify that the versions of Tailwind and Vite plugins match your styling expectations.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>23. <code>webview-ui/src/components/chat/ChatRow.tsx:86</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The inline styles and use of memo with deepEqual are acceptable in a webview; just ensure performance remains good as the chat history grows.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>24. <code>webview-ui/src/components/common/TelemetryBanner.tsx:30</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Simple and clear implementation. No major issues noted.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It violates the rule against making purely informative comments.

</details>

<details>
<summary>25. <code>webview-ui/src/components/history/HistoryView.tsx:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The integration of Fuse for fuzzy search and sorting is good. Consider debouncing the search input to reduce re-renders if performance becomes an issue.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was on unchanged code.

</details>

<details>
<summary>26. <code>webview-ui/src/components/mcp/McpView.tsx:78</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The tab architecture for MCP servers is clear. Ensure that the conditional rendering for marketplace and installed tabs covers all edge cases.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>27. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/ApiOptions.tsx:14</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The component re-renders multiple inline event handlers. For maintainability, consider extracting reusable handlers or memoizing callbacks, especially if the form becomes complex.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>28. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/OpenRouterModelPicker.tsx:210</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Usage of dangerouslySetInnerHTML is acceptable if you trust the source of model IDs. Consider adding a comment or sanitation step to confirm there’s no XSS risk.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>29. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:128</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The settings view combines multiple configuration sections. The approach is clear; if the validation logic is re-enabled later, ensure error messages are properly displayed before updating state.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is asking the author to ensure that error messages are properly displayed if validation logic is re-enabled. It is not making a specific suggestion or pointing out a specific issue with the current code. It falls under the category of asking the author to ensure behavior, which is against the rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>30. <code>webview-ui/src/components/welcome/WelcomeView.tsx:41</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The welcome view effectively uses conditional rendering to toggle API options. Consider accessibility improvements for visually impaired users (e.g., proper alt text for images).
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>31. <code>webview-ui/src/context/ExtensionStateContext.tsx:143</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The context provider is well structured. Given the complexity of the state, consider using useReducer for more predictable state updates.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>32. <code>webview-ui/src/index.css:112</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The CSS integrates Tailwind utilities nicely while preserving existing styles. Double-check that disabling preflight doesn’t introduce unexpected style issues in VS Code's webview.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>33. <code>webview-ui/vite.config.ts:38</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The Vite configuration looks solid; note that defining process.env as shown may be redundant with import.meta.env. Make sure this plays well with Vite's best practices.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>34. <code>.changeset/poor-zoos-jump.md:5</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Trivial: Consider using 'README' instead of 'Readme' for consistency with common standards. This is purely cosmetic and can be adjusted based on your naming choice.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
This is a purely cosmetic suggestion about capitalization in a changeset description file. The changeset description is internal metadata that will be consumed by the release process. The casing of "Readme" vs "README" in this context has no functional impact. This feels like unnecessary nitpicking that doesn't improve code quality.
Perhaps maintaining consistent capitalization across all documentation and metadata could help with searchability and professionalism.
While consistency is good, this is an internal changeset description that will be consumed by automation and then discarded - it's not user-facing documentation where such consistency would matter.
Delete this comment as it's suggesting a trivial capitalization change in temporary metadata that has no functional impact.

</details>

<details>
<summary>35. <code>README.md:33</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical issue: In line 33, the word 'a**N**d' appears incorrectly formatted. Consider changing it to '**and**' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>36. <code>README.md:90</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical/grammatical suggestion: In line 90, 'autonomy to fixing visual bugs' could be revised to 'autonomy to fix visual bugs' to improve readability.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>37. <code>locales/de/README.md:29</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There appears to be a formatting issue at line 29: 'u**N**d **E**ditor'. It looks like only parts of the words are bolded, which is likely unintended. Consider correcting it to either no bolding or consistent bolding (e.g., '**CLI** und **Editor**') for clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>38. <code>locales/ko/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md:37</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical error: In line 37, '신고 할' should be '신고할'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
While this is technically correct Korean grammar, we need to consider if this minor typographical error rises to the level of requiring a comment. The meaning is perfectly clear either way. Our rules state we should not make purely informative comments or comments about obvious/unimportant issues. This seems more like a style preference than a critical issue.
The correction is technically accurate, but am I being too pedantic? The current form is still completely understandable to Korean readers.
While grammatically correct, this kind of minor spacing issue doesn't materially impact the readability or understanding of the document.
This comment should be removed as it addresses a very minor typographical issue that doesn't significantly impact the document's quality or meaning.

</details>

<details>
<summary>39. <code>locales/ko/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md:39</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Inconsistent spacing in '프로젝트 유지 관리자는'. On lines 27 and 29 it is written with a space ('유지 관리자는'), but on line 39 it is written without a space ('유지관리자는'). Please standardize the spacing throughout the document.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
While the spacing inconsistency is real, this is a translation issue that requires Korean language expertise. The term could potentially be written either way in Korean. Without being a Korean language expert, we can't be certain which form is more correct. Additionally, this is a documentation file, not code, so minor spacing variations are less critical.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in official documentation. Inconsistent terminology could confuse Korean readers.
While consistency is good, making assumptions about Korean language conventions without expertise could do more harm than good. The current forms might both be acceptable in Korean.
We should not keep this comment as it requires Korean language expertise to make a proper judgment about spacing conventions.

</details>

<details>
<summary>40. <code>locales/pt-BR/README.md:42</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical note: The word 'possiveis' should be written as 'possíveis' to include the correct accent.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>41. <code>locales/pt-BR/README.md:31</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical note: The phrase 'Cline pode é capaz inclusive de usar...' is redundant. Consider revising it to either 'o Cline pode usar...' or 'o Cline é capaz de usar...' for clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>42. <code>locales/pt-BR/README.md:90</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical note: The comment 'Pixel transparente para crear un salto de línea después de la imagen flotante' mixes Spanish ('crear un salto de línea') with Portuguese. Consider using 'Pixel transparente para criar uma quebra de linha após a imagem flutuante' to maintain consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>43. <code>src/api/providers/qwen.ts:35</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The comment on line 35 has a minor typographical issue: consider capitalizing 'TypeScript' instead of 'typescript' for clarity. For example, you might rephrase it as "Branch based on API line to let poor TypeScript understand what to do."
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
This is an extremely minor stylistic change about capitalization in a comment. While "TypeScript" is technically the correct capitalization, this kind of nitpick about comment formatting doesn't help improve code quality or functionality. The current comment is perfectly clear and understandable. This kind of minor style feedback creates noise without adding value.
The official name is indeed "TypeScript" and maintaining consistent branding could be considered important for professionalism.
The benefit of correct capitalization is far outweighed by the cost of noise in the PR review. Comments should focus on substantive issues.
Delete this comment as it's an extremely minor stylistic suggestion about comment formatting that doesn't meaningfully improve the code.

</details>

<details>
<summary>44. <code>src/services/tree-sitter/index.ts:160</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: 'discrepencies' should be corrected to 'discrepancies' in the comment.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>45. <code>src/shared/api.ts:921</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical error: The key 'qwq-plus-latest' appears in the mainlandQwenModels but all similar keys use 'qwen-'. Consider renaming it to 'qwen-plus-latest' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment points out a real inconsistency in naming - all other models in both mainlandQwenModels and internationalQwenModels use the 'qwen-' prefix, while these two new entries use 'qwq-'. However, I need to consider if this is intentional. The fact that these models have different parameters (smaller context window, all prices set to 0) suggests they might be intentionally named differently to distinguish them as a separate category or type of model.
I could be wrong about the intentionality - maybe this really is just a typo. And even if it's intentional, consistency in naming could still be valuable.
Without more context about why these models are named differently, and given they appear to be a distinct type of model with different characteristics, I should err on the side of assuming the naming is intentional.
The comment should be deleted because the different naming prefix could be intentional given these models' distinct characteristics, and we don't have enough context to be confident it's a mistake.

</details>

<details>
<summary>46. <code>src/shared/api.ts:931</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical error: The key 'qwq-plus' in mainlandQwenModels likely should be 'qwen-plus' to match naming conventions used elsewhere.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment suggests renaming 'qwq-plus' to 'qwen-plus', but I need to be very careful here. While it breaks the naming pattern, this could be a legitimate model name. The model has different specs from qwen-plus (8192 vs 129024 maxTokens), suggesting it's a distinct model. Without more context about Qwen's model naming conventions from their official docs, I can't be certain this is a typo.
I could be wrong about this being intentional - it does break the established pattern and could genuinely be a typo. The similar specs to other models could suggest this.
However, the different maxTokens and contextWindow values strongly suggest this is a distinct model variant. Without clear evidence it's wrong, we should trust the author's naming choice.
Delete the comment since we don't have strong evidence that 'qwq-plus' is a typo rather than an intentional model name.

</details>

<details>
<summary>47. <code>webview-ui/src/components/welcome/WelcomeView.tsx:54</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There's an inconsistency in the naming of the model: on line 54 the text reads "Claude 3.7 Sonnet's" (with an apostrophe s) whereas on line 63 it appears as "Claude 3.7 Sonnet." Please verify the intended model name and update for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_XqvOAzWNjM1tj2Q7`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T02:58:30Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 56783d32556ce111ecbac5959d07f72e6f039367 in <ellipsistime>3 minutes and 3 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `717` lines of code in `10` files
 - Skipped `1` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `12` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:47</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Error messages for API and model ID validation are commented out. Consider enabling or removing these lines for proper user feedback.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `50%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:66</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Several vscode.postMessage calls are commented out. Clean up or finalize these calls to remove dead code.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `50%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:119</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The generateTraceIdFromTimestamp method assumes taskId is a numeric timestamp. Ensure that taskId is always a valid numeric string before conversion.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the author to ensure that `taskId` is always a valid numeric string before conversion. This falls under the category of asking the author to ensure something, which is against the rules. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or ask for a test to be written, which would have been acceptable.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>webview-ui/src/context/ExtensionStateContext.tsx:90</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The useEffect hook used for a one-time postMessage may lead to stale closures. Consider using useEffectOnce or a similar hook to ensure fresh dependencies.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `40%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>src/shared/TelemetrySetting.ts:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
TelemetrySetting and ConversationDataSetting are clearly defined. Ensure consistent naming conventions across the project.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>src/shared/WebviewMessage.ts:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
WebviewMessage aggregates many message types. Consider refactoring into grouped interfaces for better maintainability if this grows further.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `50%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:47</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There is commented‐out code (lines 47–60) that may be removed once it is no longer needed. Cleaning up such dead code will improve readability.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>webview-ui/src/context/ExtensionStateContext.tsx:102</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider abstracting the partial message update logic (lines 102–112) into a helper function. This refactoring can simplify the main message handler and improve maintainability.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:150</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The disposal method correctly loops over disposables, but as the provider manages many asynchronous resources (e.g. workspaceTracker, MCP hub), ensure that any async cleanup operations are properly awaited and errors are caught to avoid resource leaks.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>10. <code>src/extension.ts:266</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The file system watcher used for hot reloading in dev mode is a handy tool. Consider narrowing the file pattern (or adding additional filters) to target only source files that truly require a reload, to prevent unnecessary reloads in large projects.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>11. <code>General:0</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Overall, the code is well commented and logically segmented to support observability telemetry. Given the complexity (especially in core files like Cline.ts and ClineProvider.ts), consider further modularizing some functions into smaller utility modules. This could improve maintainability and testability as the feature set grows.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>12. <code>src/core/Cline.ts:1363</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical issue: In the comment line 'we dont uniquely identify system messages, so we use the timestamp as the id', consider changing 'dont' to 'don't' for proper spelling.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
While the comment is technically correct about the spelling, it's a very minor issue in a code comment that doesn't affect functionality. Comments are for developers and don't need to be perfectly formatted. This seems like unnecessary nitpicking that adds noise to the PR review.
The typo could be seen as unprofessional, and fixing it would improve code quality in a small way. Some teams do care about comment formatting.
While professional writing is good, this is an extremely minor issue that doesn't warrant a PR comment. The comment creates unnecessary noise and could distract from more important review feedback.
Delete this comment. It's too minor of an issue to be worth raising in a PR review.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_azySsvfHfywJCBA4`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T11:11:29Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on b36f33eb28f6da427ff9f494bec8dac538cd3dfa in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 15 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `11` lines of code in `1` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `5` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>.changeset/happy-taxis-heal.md:2</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Verify that the quoted package name ("claude-dev") matches our standard changeset format. If other changesets do not use quotes, consider removing them for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
This is a purely stylistic comment about formatting in changesets. While consistency is good, this seems like a minor formatting issue that could be automatically fixed by tooling if it was important. The comment is speculative ("if other changesets do not use quotes") and asks for verification rather than making a clear statement about a problem.
Perhaps inconsistent formatting in changesets could cause issues with the release process or tooling? Maybe there is an established standard I'm not aware of.
If changeset formatting was critical, it would likely be enforced by automation. The speculative nature of the comment suggests even the reviewer isn't certain about the standard.
Delete this comment as it's speculative, asks for verification, and addresses a minor formatting issue without clear evidence of a problem.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>.changeset/happy-taxis-heal.md:5</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider adding punctuation or more descriptive text if needed for clarity. Current text 'opt-in llm observability' is brief.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `40%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>.changeset/happy-taxis-heal.md:2</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Ensure 'claude-dev' is the intended package for these LLM observability changes. Confirm that the minor bump here accurately reflects the impact.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `33%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>.changeset/happy-taxis-heal.md:5</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'LLM' to match the PR title for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `33%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>.changeset/happy-taxis-heal.md:5</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the line 'opt-in llm observability', consider capitalizing 'llm' to 'LLM' for consistency with the pull request title and to properly denote the acronym.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
This is a very minor stylistic suggestion about capitalization in a changelog entry. Changesets are internal documentation that will be consumed by the release process. While technically correct that LLM is an acronym, this level of nitpicking on internal changelog formatting doesn't provide meaningful value. The meaning is perfectly clear either way.
The comment is technically correct about acronym capitalization conventions. Perhaps consistent capitalization across documentation is important for professionalism.
While technically correct, this is far too minor of an issue to warrant a PR comment. It doesn't affect functionality or meaningful documentation quality.
Delete this comment as it's an extremely minor stylistic suggestion about internal changelog formatting that doesn't provide meaningful value.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_IV6rcRJsYSMGwSEZ`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T11:12:41Z
user: login: ocasta181
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T18:31:47Z
user: login: pashpashpash
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T18:53:01Z
user: login: dcbartlett
state: CHANGES_REQUESTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T20:43:45Z
user: login: pashpashpash
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T21:04:33Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Incremental review on 5aefaaeedef82f2b8a66e5f7c0ea3f27fca4d117 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 47 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `31` lines of code in `1` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:18</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider explicitly converting IS_DEV to a boolean, e.g. comparing to 'true', since process.env values are strings.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Based on historical feedback, this comment is too similar to comments previously marked by users as bad.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:59</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The condition now checks IS_DEV to initialize tracer only in dev, but consider explicit conversion for clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Based on historical feedback, this comment is too similar to comments previously marked by users as bad.

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:116</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The captureMessage condition now stops messages in production. Ensure this is intended and consider explicit boolean conversion.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
Process.env values are strings or undefined. In this case, the implicit boolean conversion is actually fine - undefined, empty string, and "false" will all evaluate to false as desired. The explicit Boolean() conversion wouldn't change the behavior. The first part about stopping messages in production seems to just be stating what the code does, not identifying an issue.
The comment identifies a potential type safety issue with process.env variables. Maybe explicit type handling would make the code more maintainable?
While explicit type handling can be good practice, in this case the implicit conversion works correctly for all possible values. The suggestion doesn't materially improve the code.
The comment should be deleted as it doesn't identify a real issue - the current code handles the IS_DEV environment variable appropriately.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:116</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Similarly, the captureMessage method's condition includes IS_DEV without explicit boolean conversion. Ensure IS_DEV is properly checked (e.g., IS_DEV === 'true') to prevent misinterpretation of non-boolean string values.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50%
This is a valid concern - environment variables are strings, and truthy/falsy checks on strings can be error-prone. However, this is a common Node.js pattern and developers generally understand that process.env values need to be handled appropriately. The code is consistent in how it uses IS_DEV across the file. The change would make the code more explicit but isn't strictly necessary.
The comment raises a valid point about type safety. Environment variables can have unexpected values that could cause bugs.
While technically correct, this is a common Node.js pattern that most developers understand. The current code is consistent and clear in its intent.
While the suggestion would make the code more explicit, the current code follows common Node.js patterns and is unlikely to cause issues. The comment is not critical enough to keep.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_BbvFoq8D5QIE8tGd`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T21:09:37Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Incremental review on 1edf1c7d9fe78583324ab13e5440e5c79308c19e in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 35 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `20` lines of code in `1` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>package.json:259</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Ensure that adding @vscode/vsce as a dev dependency aligns with your packaging strategy. Verify that the version ^3.2.2 meets your requirements.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `33%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>package.json:230</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider using a cross-platform solution like 'cross-env' to set IS_DEV. 'IS_DEV=true vsce package' may fail on Windows.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Marked as duplicate.

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>package.json:259</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Verify that '@vscode/vsce' is needed as a devDependency rather than using a global install; document its purpose if not obvious.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `50%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_RTLS0eOyeMe2PzPx`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T21:22:29Z
user: login: dcbartlett
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T21:29:53Z
user: login: dcbartlett
state: DISMISSED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-12T23:56:35Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 44f3293352a5fb40790b705f3cb7ff3126de9d5f in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 51 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `1007` lines of code in `18` files
 - Skipped `1` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `10` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>webview-ui/src/utils/validate.ts:3</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Good readability. Consider trimming string inputs (e.g., key values) to guard against empty or whitespace-only input.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `50%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>webview-ui/src/utils/validate.ts:115</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In validateModelId, the default model ID is obtained using openRouterDefaultModelId. Consider verifying that openRouterDefaultModelId is always non-empty.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `40%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>webview-ui/src/utils/validate.ts:125</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Overall, consider abstracting similar validations into a helper mapping provider → requiredFields to reduce repetition.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `30%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>webview-ui/src/utils/validate.ts:3</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Good validations for each provider. Consider abstracting repeated error messages (e.g. 'You must provide a valid API key or choose a different provider.') into constants for easier maintenance and potential localization.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `50%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>webview-ui/src/utils/validate.ts:110</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The validateModelId function only handles 'openrouter' and 'cline' providers. If additional providers need model ID validation in the future, consider expanding this function or documenting the current limitation.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `30%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>.changeset/stale-cats-hear.md:5</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo / clarity suggestion: The message 'Fix issue with qwen model setting works incorrectly on switching Plan/Act mode settings' is a bit grammatically awkward. Consider rephrasing to something like 'Fix issue where the Qwen model setting works incorrectly when switching between Plan and Act mode settings'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
While the suggestion does improve readability, changelog messages are typically informal and don't require perfect grammar. The original message is understandable despite being slightly awkward. This feels like an unnecessary nitpick that doesn't materially improve the PR.
The improved clarity could help users better understand the changelog entry. Poor grammar could reflect badly on project quality.
The meaning is clear enough in the original, and changelogs often have informal language. This doesn't meet the bar of being a clearly required change.
Delete this comment as it's a minor grammatical suggestion that doesn't materially improve understanding.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>.changeset/violet-socks-obey.md:5</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical note: Consider rewording the sentence on line 5 for clarity. 'Allow to set computerUse for OpenAI Compatible provider' might be clearer as 'Allow setting of computerUse for the OpenAI compatible provider' or 'Allows setting computerUse for the OpenAI-compatible provider'. Please verify if 'computerUse' is the intended parameter name.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
Changelog messages are meant to be concise and clear. While the suggested rewording is slightly better grammatically, the original message is still understandable. The comment also questions the parameter name, which violates the rule about asking for verification. We should not be questioning parameter names in changelog entries - if it's in the code, it's intentional.
The grammar could be genuinely confusing to readers of the changelog. Maybe clearer communication is worth a small comment.
The original message is understandable enough. Nitpicking grammar in changelog entries is not a valuable use of review comments, and questioning parameter names is explicitly against the rules.
Delete this comment. It's a minor grammatical suggestion combined with an inappropriate question about parameter naming.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>src/api/providers/bedrock.ts:423</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The return string in formatDeepseekR1Prompt uses unusual Unicode characters (e.g. ‘｜’ and ‘▁’) instead of the typical ASCII symbols (e.g. ‘|’ and ‘_’). Please double-check if this formatting is intended per the DeepSeek R1 documentation, or if it might be a typographical error.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `30%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the PR author to double-check if the formatting is intended, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation or double-checking. However, it does point out a specific issue with unusual Unicode characters, which could be a valid concern if it was phrased differently.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>src/api/providers/litellm.ts:27</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
It looks like the variable 'isOminiModel' might have a typographical error. Perhaps the intended name is 'isOmniModel'? Clarifying this name would help avoid confusion in the future.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
The variable name seems to be correctly spelled based on what it's checking for - mini models. The comment author likely assumed it was meant to be "Omni" but there's no evidence for this. The code is checking for specific model names that include "mini", not "omni". This appears to be a false positive suggestion.
Could there be some domain knowledge about these models that I'm missing? Maybe these are actually called "Omni" models in some documentation I haven't seen.
Even if there is external documentation, the code itself is clearly checking for "mini" in the model names, so the variable name accurately reflects its purpose. The code is the source of truth here.
The comment should be deleted as it appears to be incorrect - the variable name accurately reflects what it's checking for in the model IDs.

</details>

<details>
<summary>10. <code>src/shared/api.ts:1350</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical error: The model identifier 'QwQ-32B-Preview' appears to be a typo. It is likely intended to be 'Qwen-32B-Preview' to be consistent with other Qwen model names.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
The existence of other "qwq" models in the codebase suggests that "QwQ" is not a typo but rather a legitimate model name variant. Without more context about SambaNova's model naming conventions, I cannot be certain that this is actually a typo. The comment is making an assumption based on pattern matching that could be incorrect.
I could be wrong if there's external documentation from SambaNova that confirms this is indeed a typo. The presence of other "qwq" models might be unrelated since they're in a different section.
However, given the rule that we need STRONG EVIDENCE that a comment is correct, and seeing contradictory evidence in the codebase itself with other "qwq" models, we should err on the side of not making assumptions about model names.
Delete the comment because we don't have strong evidence that "QwQ" is a typo, and there are other models in the codebase using the "qwq" prefix.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_cCqRheMAZShHPwD1`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-13T02:59:34Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 7ef50571a31bca474d1f86548a7348cf2ed2486e in <ellipsistime>39 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `22` lines of code in `1` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>package.json:5</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 3.7.1 detected. Ensure the changeset and documentation reflect any new features or fixes introduced.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>package.json:279</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Dependency '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk' updated to ^1.7.0. Confirm that any API changes in the new version are fully integrated.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>package.json:5</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated from 3.6.10 to 3.7.1. Ensure the version follows semver rules aligned with your new LLM observability features.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>package.json:279</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Dependency update: '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk' bumped from ^1.0.1 to ^1.7.0. Verify that this major version jump doesn't introduce breaking changes in the LLM observability integration.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is about a dependency update, which is not allowed according to the rules. It asks the PR author to verify potential breaking changes, which is also not allowed. Therefore, this comment should be removed.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_fuk6uUXlWqLyraPT`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-20T05:43:26Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on fc53ddd6755c1668a0437a0c7a0c7cbd74de10de in <ellipsistime>55 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `48` lines of code in `1` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `7` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:7</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The import order for ConversationDataSetting and TelemetrySetting was flipped. While harmless, please ensure this is intentional to avoid unnecessary diff noise.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `30%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:34</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The 'totalTasksSize' message type is added in the union. Consider adding a short comment explaining its purpose for better clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `20%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:200</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
New interfaces ClinePlanModeResponse and ClineAskQuestion are added. Consider adding JSDoc comments to clarify their intended usage.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `20%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Minor stylistic change: adjusted import order for ConversationDataSetting and TelemetrySetting for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:34</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
New message type 'totalTasksSize' added to the union; consider adding a brief comment explaining its purpose.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `33%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:70</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
New 'totalTasksSize' property added to ExtensionMessage; if null isn’t expected under normal conditions, consider using just 'number' and adding documentation on the null case.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `33%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:202</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
New interfaces 'ClinePlanModeResponse' and 'ClineAskQuestion' are introduced; ensure they are documented or accompanied by usage examples if needed for clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `33%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_ABA4cm2LXBItsJVv`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-20T05:50:41Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Skipped PR review on 50eadaf60f2b9ad83a68eda90a0c42db6ecd95e6 because no changed files had a supported extension. If you think this was in error, please [contact us](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/contact) and we'll fix it right away.
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-20T05:54:15Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 4c2018168eced54c4c080c1ea6bb5022870bc880 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 8 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `13` lines of code in `1` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:76</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Using 'apiConfigurationToSubmit' conditionally to send undefined when validations fail is functional, but it silently drops invalid configurations. Consider adding user feedback (e.g., display error messages) so users know why their API configuration wasn’t saved.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
The code shows error message state variables and props being passed to ApiOptions, suggesting there is already a mechanism for showing validation errors. The commented out lines hint that error display was previously implemented. The comment seems to be addressing something that's already handled by the existing code structure.
I could be wrong about whether the ApiOptions component actually displays these errors effectively. The commented out error setting code could indicate the error display isn't working.
Even if error display isn't fully working, the infrastructure for error messages exists in the code. This makes the comment less useful since the pattern for handling errors is already established.
The comment should be deleted since the code already has error message handling infrastructure, making the suggestion redundant.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:73</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Good change using 'apiConfigurationToSubmit' to ensure only valid API configuration is submitted. However, since invalid configurations are silently replaced with undefined, consider adding user feedback or logging to indicate that the API config was not saved due to validation errors. Also, tidy up or remove commented-out error message code if it's no longer needed.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_47CjMTSJZOQEnJV1`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-20T05:57:49Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 315c622ffa69908116f02fbb33033c6cd0f9b716 in <ellipsistime>48 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `26` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/shared/WebviewMessage.ts:7</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Remove unused ConversationDataSetting import. This cleanup looks good.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>webview-ui/src/context/ExtensionStateContext.tsx:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Removed ConversationDataSetting from imports for telemetry settings. This change appears safe.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/shared/WebviewMessage.ts:7</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Removed ConversationDataSetting from the import. Confirm it's not used elsewhere, as cleaning up unused imports is a good practice.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>webview-ui/src/context/ExtensionStateContext.tsx:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Removed unused ConversationDataSetting import. Ensure no dependencies on ConversationDataSetting are missed.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_fZa0XWDbCkZ4Nmll`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-20T06:05:12Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on e587bc0f9239c7ffe62770429dea07554a9654c4 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 6 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `22` lines of code in `1` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:91</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Removed duplicate and unused fields (mcpMarketplaceEnabled, extra telemetrySetting, duplicate conversationDataSetting, and planActSeparateModelsSetting). Ensure these removals are intentional and won’t break external consumers.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:94</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Confirm that removing 'mcpMarketplaceEnabled' and 'planActSeparateModelsSetting' is intentional. These fields were removed from ExtensionState; ensure dependent code is updated accordingly.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:94</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Note the consolidation of 'telemetrySetting' and 'conversationDataSetting'. 'conversationDataSetting' is now declared only once and grouped with telemetrySetting; verify that this reordering does not affect any consumers.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the PR author to verify that the reordering does not affect any consumers, which is against the rules. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue with the code.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' in the comment to adhere to common terminology.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_k9WESimhQmJYaTvH`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-20T06:08:45Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on dbeb65bcbfc921fc2caba30e728073ea48827293 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 19 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `141` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `12` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:532</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Removal of conversation telemetry updates looks intentional. Confirm that any dependent logic (e.g. conversationDataSetting in state) was removed consistently in all areas. Ensure no external code still depends on conversation data telemetry.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the PR author to confirm that dependent logic was removed consistently and to ensure no external code depends on the removed feature. This violates the rule against asking the author to confirm or ensure things. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>src/extension.ts:11</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The conversationTelemetryService import has been removed and telemetry shutdown now calls only telemetryService.shutdown(). Verify that no remnants of conversation telemetry remain in extension activation/deactivation flows.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the PR author to verify that no remnants of conversation telemetry remain, which is against the rules as it asks for verification. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue.

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/extension.ts:207</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Development-only file watch logic for auto reloading seems okay but ensure it doesn’t accidentally ship in production builds.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>src/extension.ts:68</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider using a more explicit logic for determining the target editor column. Using Math.max on the mapped viewColumn values may return -Infinity in edge cases, even though you check for visible editors later. Clarify or add a comment to explain the intent.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>src/extension.ts:90</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Add a clarifying comment about why a 100ms delay is needed before locking the editor group. This will help maintainers understand the timing dependency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>src/extension.ts:207</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the development-only file watcher, consider debouncing rapid file changes to avoid triggering multiple reloads consecutively during bulk edits.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:386</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The Content Security Policy includes 'unsafe-eval' in the script-src directive. If possible, avoid using 'unsafe-eval' due to security risks, or document why it is strictly necessary.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:1285</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Usage of 'URL.canParse' for validating the baseUrl may not be standard across all Node versions. Consider using a try/catch with the URL constructor to better validate URLs.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:1836</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider replacing the use of fs.rmdir with fs.rm (with appropriate options) for removing the task directory, to align with current Node.js recommendations.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>10. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:2110</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The logic for determining 'planActSeparateModelsSetting' is a bit complex. Consider refactoring this decision process into a separate helper function or adding additional comments to clarify the intent for future maintainers.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>11. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:1070</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the cancelTask method, review the conditions used with pWaitFor to ensure all possible task states are handled. Adding extra logging here could help in troubleshooting any hanging or race conditions during task cancellation.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>12. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:344</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical error: In the comment explaining the codicon font import, the phrase "css fileinto our react app" should be corrected to "css file into our react app".
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_SJb6dgAZrzD4WDPe`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-20T06:17:09Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on f840ce4bcd462becd720c75c9271a7ca9b4a1739 in <ellipsistime>2 minutes and 24 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `37` lines of code in `1` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `10` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:938</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider adding error handling (try/catch) around updateGlobalState in updateTelemetrySetting to ensure that telemetry state isn't left inconsistent if the update fails.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50%
The concern about inconsistent state is valid - if updateGlobalState fails but telemetryService.updateTelemetryState succeeds, the persisted setting would be out of sync with the runtime state. However, updateGlobalState is a core VSCode API that is likely very reliable. The impact of failure would be minimal since the setting would just revert on next load. The code is also quite simple and the try/catch would add complexity.
I may be underestimating the importance of data consistency here. Even if failures are rare, having inconsistent telemetry state could be confusing for users and make debugging harder.
While data consistency is important, this is a non-critical setting that gets re-read on startup anyway. The added complexity and noise of error handling may not be worth it for this simple case.
The comment raises a valid concern but the suggested change would add complexity without significant benefit given the non-critical nature of this setting.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:710</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Remove or limit debugging logs (console.log) in production code, especially in authentication flows, to avoid leaking sensitive information.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:1450</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider refactoring and clarifying error handling in downloadMcp. The nested axios error branches make the logic hard to follow—extract helper functions or improve the conditional branching.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:1250</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
If creating the MCP servers directory fails, the fallback returns a hard-coded path. Consider logging more context or handling permissions errors explicitly.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:1286</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
URL.canParse is not a standard method in JavaScript. Consider using a try-catch around new URL(baseUrl) for URL validation.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:1907</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In clearTask(), consider awaiting the abortTask() call to ensure the task is properly aborted before proceeding.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:713</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Instead of using console.log for the login action, consider using the outputChannel (or another dedicated logger) for consistent logging in production.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `50%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:1255</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Returning a literal '~/Documents/Cline/MCP' may not expand the home directory correctly. Consider using os.homedir() to build the fallback path.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:1957</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The getState() function is quite large. Consider refactoring it into smaller, focused functions for improved readability and maintainability.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `40%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>10. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:344</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical error: In the comment explaining the codicon font, 'css fileinto' should be corrected to 'css file into'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_la6vkvhGEZQrW138`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-20T06:20:11Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on c636338387d753f56ad598e42c55a3b8be54db85 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 53 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `28` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:96</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Removal of conversationDataSetting property in ExtensionState looks intentional. Ensure all references to it in the codebase are removed.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the author to ensure that all references to a removed property are also removed. This is similar to asking the author to double-check things, which is against the rules. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue, so it should be removed.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>src/shared/TelemetrySetting.ts:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Removed unused conversationDataSetting type. Confirm that no dependent code still expects this type.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the PR author to confirm that no dependent code expects the removed type. This falls under asking the author to double-check things, which is against the rules. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue with the code.

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/shared/ExtensionMessage.ts:96</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Removed 'conversationDataSetting' from ExtensionState. Ensure this removal is deliberate and state migration (if any persisted settings exist) is handled.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
This comment violates several rules. It asks the author to "ensure" something, which is explicitly discouraged. It's speculative about potential state migration issues. It doesn't point to a specific problem, just raises a general concern. We don't have evidence that state migration is actually needed or that this would cause issues.
Maybe removing this field could cause runtime errors if old persisted state tries to access it. The migration concern could be valid.
While that's possible, we don't have evidence that this is actually an issue. The field was optional (had ? modifier), so its absence shouldn't cause runtime errors. Without more context about how state is persisted, this is speculative.
Delete this comment as it violates rules against asking authors to "ensure" things and making speculative comments without clear evidence of actual issues.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>src/shared/TelemetrySetting.ts:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Removed 'ConversationDataSetting' type. Confirm that this type is no longer needed and update docs if required.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_pumufaXOkg5ysX5z`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-20T06:21:24Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Incremental review on ada0fc06bc76b1c605b37c9cdb4a58536667bf28 in <ellipsistime>2 minutes and 35 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `420` lines of code in `5` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `9` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:129</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Ensure that taskId (used for generating traceId using BigInt) and message.ts are always numeric. If these values can ever be non-numeric strings, additional validation or conversion logic is needed to avoid runtime errors.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:46</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There are commented-out lines for setting error messages in handleSubmit. Either remove them or enable proper validation feedback for API configuration and model ID so users are informed of configuration issues.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:129</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The span generation uses taskId (converted via BigInt) to produce a trace ID. Ensure taskId is always a numeric string to avoid unexpected results.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:227</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The extractContent helper assumes non-string message content is an array and maps over it. Confirm that message content always meets this expectation to avoid runtime errors.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:46</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The error state updates for API and model validation are commented out, which prevents immediate user feedback on configuration errors. Consider uncommenting or properly handling validation errors.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx:127</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The handleSubmit function conditionally clears invalid API configuration without alerting the user. Ensure that validation failures are communicated to the user instead of silently clearing configuration.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>package.json:218</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
It looks like there are two spaces after the comma in the phrase 'Share message data,  code, and more extensive telemetry.' Consider removing the extra space to maintain consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `30%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is about a minor formatting issue, specifically an extra space after a comma. While it is a suggestion for consistency, it doesn't provide significant value in terms of code functionality or logic. It seems more like a nitpick rather than a substantial comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>src/core/Cline.ts:67</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Minor typographical error: the comment on system prompt creation says "we dont uniquely identify system messages...". Consider changing "dont" to "don't" to improve clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was on unchanged code.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>src/core/webview/ClineProvider.ts:346</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the comment (around line 346) the phrase 'css fileinto our react app' should be corrected to 'css file into our react app' to fix the spacing issue.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_Ekj19kRqgyNphu35`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-20T09:43:07Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Skipped PR review on ce6181afb990074a9c1ed9ea04f5fd9a5682334b because no changed files had a supported extension. If you think this was in error, please [contact us](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/contact) and we'll fix it right away.
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-21T00:03:52Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8a162827e53e6fc894a111ffa66ec965895a2d64 in <ellipsistime>36 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `13` lines of code in `1` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:76</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Good removal of sensitive API key logging. Logging sensitive values in production can lead to security vulnerabilities, so this change improves security.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is purely informative and does not provide a specific suggestion or question related to the code changes. It simply states a general best practice about not logging sensitive information, which is not actionable feedback for the PR author.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts:76</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Good change: removing sensitive API key from log output improves security and avoids accidental exposure of credentials.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It simply acknowledges a positive change without adding value to the review process.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_XH7t1VIsSKpetOf0`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-21T00:07:58Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Skipped PR review on 0040cea2e8afe390d299755f210372eeee1ebb60 because no changed files had a supported extension. If you think this was in error, please [contact us](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/contact) and we'll fix it right away.
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-21T01:17:53Z
user: login: saoudrizwan
body: lgtm :)
state: APPROVED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-03-21T01:21:48Z

Review comments:
diff_hunk: @@ -1 +1,2 @@
 export type TelemetrySetting = "unset" | "enabled" | "disabled"
+export type ConversationDataSetting = "unset" | "enabled" | "disabled"
path: src/shared/TelemetrySetting.ts
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: This type is functionally identical to the existing `TelemetrySetting` type. Consider using that instead of creating a new type.

- type `TelemetrySetting` ([TelemetrySetting.ts](https://github.com/cline/cline/blob/7bc5ff750976b797ab1976c6f3c276bbfe00f126/src/shared/TelemetrySetting.ts#L1-L1))
```suggestion
export type ConversationDataSetting = TelemetrySetting
```
created_at: 2025-03-12T02:34:52Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+import { trace, context, SpanKind, SpanStatusCode } from "@opentelemetry/api"
+import { OTLPTraceExporter } from "@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http"
+import { Resource } from "@opentelemetry/resources"
+import { SimpleSpanProcessor } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base"
+import { NodeTracerProvider } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node"
+import { ATTR_SERVICE_NAME, ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION } from "@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions"
+import * as vscode from "vscode"
+
+interface ConversationMetadata {
+	apiProvider: string
+	model: string
+	tokensIn: number
+	tokensOut: number
+}
+
+/**
+ * Service for collecting conversation data using OpenTelemetry
+ */
+export class ConversationTelemetryService {
+	private static instance: ConversationTelemetryService
+	private enabled: boolean = false
+	private distinctId: string
+	private clineApiKey?: string
+	private apiEndpoint: string = "http://localhost:8100/v1/traces"
+	private tracerProvider: NodeTracerProvider | undefined
+	private tracer: any
+	private messageIndices: Map<string, number> = new Map()
+
+	private constructor(distinctId: string) {
+		this.distinctId = distinctId
+	}
+
+	public static getInstance(distinctId: string): ConversationTelemetryService {
+		if (!ConversationTelemetryService.instance) {
+			ConversationTelemetryService.instance = new ConversationTelemetryService(distinctId)
+		}
+		return ConversationTelemetryService.instance
+	}
+
+	public updateTelemetryState(enabled: boolean, clineApiKey?: string): void {
+		// If state is changing from disabled to enabled, initialize the tracer
+		if (!this.enabled && enabled) {
+			this.initializeTracer()
+		}
+
+		this.enabled = enabled
+		this.clineApiKey = clineApiKey
+	}
+
+	private initializeTracer(): void {
+		try {
+			// Create a resource that identifies our service
+			const resource = new Resource({
+				[ATTR_SERVICE_NAME]: "cline-extension",
+				[ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION]: "1.0.0",
+			})
+
+			// Configure the OTLP exporter
+			const headers: Record<string, string> = {
+				"Content-Type": "application/json",
+			}
+
+			// Add API key to headers if available
+			if (this.clineApiKey) {
+				headers["Authorization"] = `Bearer ${this.clineApiKey}`
+			}
+
+			const exporter = new OTLPTraceExporter({
+				url: this.apiEndpoint,
+				headers,
+			})
+
+			// Create the span processor
+			const spanProcessor = new SimpleSpanProcessor(exporter as any)
+
+			// Create the trace provider with the span processor in the config
+			this.tracerProvider = new NodeTracerProvider({
+				resource,
+				spanProcessors: [spanProcessor as any],
+			})
+
+			// Register the provider
+			this.tracerProvider.register()
+
+			// Get a tracer
+			this.tracer = trace.getTracer("cline-conversation-tracer")
+
+			console.log("OpenTelemetry tracer initialized successfully")
+		} catch (error) {
+			console.error("Failed to initialize OpenTelemetry tracer:", error)
+		}
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Captures a message in the conversation as an OpenTelemetry span
+	 */
+	public captureMessage(taskId: string, message: any, metadata: ConversationMetadata): void {
+		if (!this.enabled || !this.tracer) return
+
+		try {
+			// Convert taskId to a valid trace ID (must be 32 hex chars)
+			const traceId = this.generateTraceIdFromTimestamp(taskId)
+
+			// Convert message timestamp to a valid span ID (must be 16 hex chars)
+			if (!message.ts) {
+				throw new Error("Message timestamp is required")
+			}
+
+			const timestamp = message.ts
path: src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: The tracer uses `BigInt(timestamp)` where `message.ts` is assumed numeric. Ensure all timestamps are valid numbers (e.g., in milliseconds) and consider using proper OpenTelemetry types for the tracer instead of `any`.
```suggestion
			const timestamp = Number(message.ts)
```
created_at: 2025-03-12T02:34:52Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+import { trace, context, SpanKind, SpanStatusCode } from "@opentelemetry/api"
+import { OTLPTraceExporter } from "@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http"
+import { Resource } from "@opentelemetry/resources"
+import { SimpleSpanProcessor } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base"
+import { NodeTracerProvider } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node"
+import { ATTR_SERVICE_NAME, ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION } from "@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions"
+import * as vscode from "vscode"
+
+interface ConversationMetadata {
+	apiProvider: string
+	model: string
+	tokensIn: number
+	tokensOut: number
+}
+
+/**
+ * Service for collecting conversation data using OpenTelemetry
+ */
+export class ConversationTelemetryService {
+	private static instance: ConversationTelemetryService
+	private enabled: boolean = false
+	private distinctId: string
+	private clineApiKey?: string
+	private apiEndpoint: string = "http://localhost:8100/v1/traces"
+	private tracerProvider: NodeTracerProvider | undefined
+	private tracer: any
path: src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Consider replacing the use of `any` for the `tracer` type with a proper type (e.g. using `Tracer` from `@opentelemetry/api`) to improve type safety and clarity.
created_at: 2025-03-12T02:34:52Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -1 +1,2 @@
 export type TelemetrySetting = "unset" | "enabled" | "disabled"
+export type ConversationDataSetting = "unset" | "enabled" | "disabled"
path: src/shared/TelemetrySetting.ts
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: This type is identical to `TelemetrySetting` - consider using the existing type instead of creating a duplicate.

- type `TelemetrySetting` ([TelemetrySetting.ts](https://github.com/cline/cline/blob/56783d32556ce111ecbac5959d07f72e6f039367/src/shared/TelemetrySetting.ts#L1-L1))
```suggestion
export type ConversationDataSetting = TelemetrySetting
```
created_at: 2025-03-12T11:11:29Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+import { trace, context, SpanKind, SpanStatusCode } from "@opentelemetry/api"
+import { OTLPTraceExporter } from "@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http"
+import { Resource } from "@opentelemetry/resources"
+import { SimpleSpanProcessor } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base"
+import { NodeTracerProvider } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node"
+import { ATTR_SERVICE_NAME, ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION } from "@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions"
+
+import { Anthropic } from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"
+
+export type TelemetryChatMessage = {
+	role: "user" | "assistant" | "system"
+	ts: number
+	content: Anthropic.Messages.MessageParam["content"]
+}
+
+import * as vscode from "vscode"
+
+interface ConversationMetadata {
+	apiProvider: string
+	model: string
+	tokensIn: number
+	tokensOut: number
+}
+
+/**
+ * Service for collecting conversation data using OpenTelemetry
+ */
+export class ConversationTelemetryService {
+	private static instance: ConversationTelemetryService
+	private enabled: boolean = false
+	private distinctId: string
+	private clineApiKey?: string
+	private apiEndpoint: string = "https://api.cline.bot/v1/traces"
+	private tracerProvider: NodeTracerProvider | undefined
+	private tracer: any
+	private messageIndices: Map<string, number> = new Map()
+
+	private constructor(distinctId: string) {
+		this.distinctId = distinctId
+	}
+
+	public static getInstance(distinctId: string): ConversationTelemetryService {
+		if (!ConversationTelemetryService.instance) {
+			ConversationTelemetryService.instance = new ConversationTelemetryService(distinctId)
+		}
+		return ConversationTelemetryService.instance
+	}
+
+	public updateTelemetryState(enabled: boolean, clineApiKey?: string): void {
+		console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] Updating telemetry state...", { enabled, clineApiKey })
+
+		// First update the state variables
+		this.enabled = enabled
+		this.clineApiKey = clineApiKey
+
+		// Then initialize the tracer if needed
+		if (this.enabled && !this.tracer) {
+			this.initializeTracer()
+		}
+	}
+
+	private initializeTracer(): void {
+		try {
+			// Create a resource that identifies our service
+			const resource = new Resource({
+				[ATTR_SERVICE_NAME]: "cline-extension",
+				[ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION]: "1.0.0",
+			})
+
+			console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] Initializing OpenTelemetry tracer...", { "this.clineApiKey": this.clineApiKey })
+
+			// Configure the OTLP exporter
+			const headers: Record<string, string> = {
+				"Content-Type": "application/json",
+			}
+
+			// Add API key to headers if available
+			if (this.clineApiKey) {
+				headers["Authorization"] = `Bearer ${this.clineApiKey}`
+			}
+
+			const exporter = new OTLPTraceExporter({
+				url: this.apiEndpoint,
+				headers,
+			})
+
+			// Create the span processor
+			const spanProcessor = new SimpleSpanProcessor(exporter as any)
+
+			// Create the trace provider with the span processor in the config
+			this.tracerProvider = new NodeTracerProvider({
+				resource,
+				spanProcessors: [spanProcessor as any],
+			})
+
+			// Register the provider
+			this.tracerProvider.register()
+
+			// Get a tracer
+			this.tracer = trace.getTracer("cline-conversation-tracer")
+
+			console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] OpenTelemetry tracer initialized successfully")
+		} catch (error) {
+			console.error("[ConversationTelemetry] Failed to initialize OpenTelemetry tracer:", error)
+		}
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Captures a message in the conversation as an OpenTelemetry span
+	 * ONLY HAPPENS IF USER IS OPTED INTO CONVERSATION TELEMETRY IN ADVANCED SETTINGS
+	 */
+	public captureMessage(taskId: string, message: TelemetryChatMessage, metadata: ConversationMetadata): void {
+		// Do NOT capture message if user has not explicitly opted in
+		if (!this.enabled || !this.tracer) {
+			return
+		}
+
+		try {
+			// Convert taskId to a valid trace ID (must be 32 hex chars)
+			const traceId = this.generateTraceIdFromTimestamp(taskId)
+
+			// Convert message timestamp to a valid span ID (must be 16 hex chars)
+			if (!message.ts && message.ts !== 0) {
path: src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Instead of checking with `if (!message.ts && message.ts !== 0)`, consider using a simpler nullish check (e.g. `if (message.ts == null)`) to verify a missing timestamp. This improves clarity.
```suggestion
			if (message.ts == null) {
```
created_at: 2025-03-12T11:11:29Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -3120,6 +3141,42 @@ export class Cline {
 
 		telemetryService.captureConversationTurnEvent(this.taskId, this.apiProvider, this.api.getModel().id, "user")
 
+		// Capture message data for telemetry,
path: src/core/Cline.ts
user: login: ocasta181
body: Is there a way we can move the bulk of this logic out into a function held in a separate file? I'm concerned about further bloating cline.ts
created_at: 2025-03-12T18:31:47Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -3120,6 +3141,42 @@ export class Cline {
 
 		telemetryService.captureConversationTurnEvent(this.taskId, this.apiProvider, this.api.getModel().id, "user")
 
+		// Capture message data for telemetry,
path: src/core/Cline.ts
user: login: pashpashpash
body: I understand the concern about file size, but moving these functions out in isolation would actually introduce more complexity without addressing the core architectural needs.

the message handling logic is tightly coupled with several provider-specific dependencies (apiProvider, taskId, model settings) and requires specific timing/cleanup handling. Creating separate utility functions would mean either:

1. Passing all these dependencies as parameters, leading to unwieldy function signatures and potential maintainability issues
2. Creating new interfaces/abstractions just for this specific use case, which adds more indirection without clear benefits

if we want to properly modularize this code, it would make more sense to do it as part of a larger architectural refactor that thoughtfully separates the message handling responsibilities. 

For now, keeping this logic colocated provides better clarity around the dependencies and control flow.
created_at: 2025-03-12T18:53:01Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -3120,6 +3141,42 @@ export class Cline {
 
 		telemetryService.captureConversationTurnEvent(this.taskId, this.apiProvider, this.api.getModel().id, "user")
 
+		// Capture message data for telemetry,
+		// ONLY if user is opted in, in advanced settings
+		// This is done after a timeout to ensure the message is added to the conversation history
+		setTimeout(() => {
+			if (this.apiProvider && this.api.getModel().id) {
+				const metadata = {
+					apiProvider: this.apiProvider,
+					model: this.api.getModel().id,
+					tokensIn: 0,
+					tokensOut: 0,
+				}
+
+				// Get the last message from apiConversationHistory
+				const lastMessage = this.apiConversationHistory[this.apiConversationHistory.length - 1]
+
+				// Get the corresponding timestamp from clineMessages
+				// The last message in clineMessages should be the one we just added
+
+				const lastClineMessage = this.clineMessages[this.clineMessages.length - 1]
+				const ts = lastClineMessage.ts
+
+				// Add the timestamp to the message object for telemetry
+				const messageWithTs = {
+					...lastMessage,
+					ts,
+				}
+
+				// Send individual message to telemetry
+				conversationTelemetryService.captureMessage(this.taskId, messageWithTs, metadata)
+
+				// Send entire conversation history to cleanup endpoint
+				// This ensures deleted messages are properly handled in telemetry
+				conversationTelemetryService.cleanupTask(this.taskId, this.clineMessages)
+			}
+		}, 5)
path: src/core/Cline.ts
user: login: dcbartlett
body: We should consider not providing a timeout time here.  setTimeout when you don't pass a time for the timeout just appends the predicate to the bottom of the stack.  We may be fine with this just being appended to the bottom of the stack.
created_at: 2025-03-12T20:30:09Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -3197,6 +3254,38 @@ export class Cline {
 
 				telemetryService.captureConversationTurnEvent(this.taskId, this.apiProvider, this.api.getModel().id, "assistant")
 
+				// Capture message data for telemetry after assistant response
+				// ONLY if user is opted in, in advanced settings
+				if (this.apiProvider && this.api.getModel().id) {
+					const metadata = {
+						apiProvider: this.apiProvider,
+						model: this.api.getModel().id,
+						tokensIn: inputTokens,
+						tokensOut: outputTokens,
+					}
+
+					// Get the last message from apiConversationHistory
+					const lastMessage = this.apiConversationHistory[this.apiConversationHistory.length - 1]
+
+					// Find the corresponding timestamp from clineMessages
+					// For assistant messages, we need to find the most recent "text" message
+					const lastTextMessage = findLast(this.clineMessages, (m) => m.say === "text")
+
+					// Add the timestamp to the message object for telemetry
+					if (!lastTextMessage) {
+						console.error("No text message found in clineMessages")
+					} else {
+						const messageWithTs = {
+							...lastMessage,
+							ts: lastTextMessage.ts,
+						}
+
+						setTimeout(() => {
+							conversationTelemetryService.captureMessage(this.taskId, messageWithTs, metadata)
+						}, 5)
path: src/core/Cline.ts
user: login: dcbartlett
body: Same comment here about the timeout.
created_at: 2025-03-12T20:32:41Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+import { trace, context, SpanKind, SpanStatusCode } from "@opentelemetry/api"
+import { OTLPTraceExporter } from "@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http"
+import { Resource } from "@opentelemetry/resources"
+import { SimpleSpanProcessor } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base"
+import { NodeTracerProvider } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node"
+import { ATTR_SERVICE_NAME, ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION } from "@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions"
+
+import { Anthropic } from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"
+
+export type TelemetryChatMessage = {
+	role: "user" | "assistant" | "system"
+	ts: number
+	content: Anthropic.Messages.MessageParam["content"]
+}
+
+import * as vscode from "vscode"
+
+interface ConversationMetadata {
+	apiProvider: string
+	model: string
+	tokensIn: number
+	tokensOut: number
+}
+
+/**
+ * Service for collecting conversation data using OpenTelemetry
+ */
+export class ConversationTelemetryService {
+	private static instance: ConversationTelemetryService
+	private enabled: boolean = false
+	private distinctId: string
+	private clineApiKey?: string
+	private apiEndpoint: string = "https://api.cline.bot/v1/traces"
+	private tracerProvider: NodeTracerProvider | undefined
+	private tracer: any
+	private messageIndices: Map<string, number> = new Map()
+
+	private constructor(distinctId: string) {
+		this.distinctId = distinctId
+	}
+
+	public static getInstance(distinctId: string): ConversationTelemetryService {
+		if (!ConversationTelemetryService.instance) {
+			ConversationTelemetryService.instance = new ConversationTelemetryService(distinctId)
+		}
+		return ConversationTelemetryService.instance
+	}
+
+	public updateTelemetryState(enabled: boolean, clineApiKey?: string): void {
+		console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] Updating telemetry state...", { enabled, clineApiKey })
+
+		// First update the state variables
+		this.enabled = enabled
+		this.clineApiKey = clineApiKey
+
+		// Then initialize the tracer if needed
+		if (this.enabled && !this.tracer) {
+			this.initializeTracer()
+		}
+	}
+
+	private initializeTracer(): void {
+		try {
+			// Create a resource that identifies our service
+			const resource = new Resource({
+				[ATTR_SERVICE_NAME]: "cline-extension",
+				[ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION]: "1.0.0",
+			})
+
+			console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] Initializing OpenTelemetry tracer...", { "this.clineApiKey": this.clineApiKey })
+
+			// Configure the OTLP exporter
+			const headers: Record<string, string> = {
+				"Content-Type": "application/json",
+			}
+
+			// Add API key to headers if available
+			if (this.clineApiKey) {
+				headers["Authorization"] = `Bearer ${this.clineApiKey}`
+			}
+
+			const exporter = new OTLPTraceExporter({
+				url: this.apiEndpoint,
+				headers,
+			})
+
+			// Create the span processor
+			const spanProcessor = new SimpleSpanProcessor(exporter as any)
+
+			// Create the trace provider with the span processor in the config
+			this.tracerProvider = new NodeTracerProvider({
+				resource,
+				spanProcessors: [spanProcessor as any],
+			})
+
+			// Register the provider
+			this.tracerProvider.register()
+
+			// Get a tracer
+			this.tracer = trace.getTracer("cline-conversation-tracer")
+
+			console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] OpenTelemetry tracer initialized successfully")
+		} catch (error) {
+			console.error("[ConversationTelemetry] Failed to initialize OpenTelemetry tracer:", error)
+		}
+	}
+
+	/**
+	 * Captures a message in the conversation as an OpenTelemetry span
+	 * ONLY HAPPENS IF USER IS OPTED INTO CONVERSATION TELEMETRY IN ADVANCED SETTINGS
+	 */
+	public captureMessage(taskId: string, message: TelemetryChatMessage, metadata: ConversationMetadata): void {
+		// Do NOT capture message if user has not explicitly opted in
+		if (!this.enabled || !this.tracer) {
+			return
+		}
path: src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts
user: login: dcbartlett
body: I would think we would want to check this before calling this method.  I know that this consolidates the check to a single place, but it also means that we add one more step for the runtime to process.  It would be interesting to see if the performance hit is worth the maintenance cost or not.
created_at: 2025-03-12T20:39:53Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+import { trace, context, SpanKind, SpanStatusCode } from "@opentelemetry/api"
+import { OTLPTraceExporter } from "@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http"
+import { Resource } from "@opentelemetry/resources"
+import { SimpleSpanProcessor } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base"
+import { NodeTracerProvider } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node"
+import { ATTR_SERVICE_NAME, ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION } from "@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions"
+
+import { Anthropic } from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"
+
+export type TelemetryChatMessage = {
+	role: "user" | "assistant" | "system"
+	ts: number
+	content: Anthropic.Messages.MessageParam["content"]
+}
+
+import * as vscode from "vscode"
+
+interface ConversationMetadata {
+	apiProvider: string
+	model: string
+	tokensIn: number
+	tokensOut: number
+}
+
+/**
+ * Service for collecting conversation data using OpenTelemetry
+ */
+export class ConversationTelemetryService {
+	private static instance: ConversationTelemetryService
+	private enabled: boolean = false
+	private distinctId: string
+	private clineApiKey?: string
+	private apiEndpoint: string = "https://api.cline.bot/v1/traces"
+	private tracerProvider: NodeTracerProvider | undefined
+	private tracer: any
+	private messageIndices: Map<string, number> = new Map()
+
+	private constructor(distinctId: string) {
+		this.distinctId = distinctId
+	}
+
+	public static getInstance(distinctId: string): ConversationTelemetryService {
+		if (!ConversationTelemetryService.instance) {
+			ConversationTelemetryService.instance = new ConversationTelemetryService(distinctId)
+		}
+		return ConversationTelemetryService.instance
+	}
+
+	public updateTelemetryState(enabled: boolean, clineApiKey?: string): void {
+		console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] Updating telemetry state...", { enabled, clineApiKey })
+
+		// First update the state variables
+		this.enabled = enabled
path: src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts
user: login: dcbartlett
body: Pretty sure we can run into some very interesting situations when using multiple web-views and toggling this on and off.  We should definitely do some testing around enabling and disabling this during use of the extension.
created_at: 2025-03-12T20:43:28Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+import { trace, context, SpanKind, SpanStatusCode } from "@opentelemetry/api"
+import { OTLPTraceExporter } from "@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http"
+import { Resource } from "@opentelemetry/resources"
+import { SimpleSpanProcessor } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base"
+import { NodeTracerProvider } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node"
+import { ATTR_SERVICE_NAME, ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION } from "@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions"
+
+import { Anthropic } from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"
+
+export type TelemetryChatMessage = {
+	role: "user" | "assistant" | "system"
+	ts: number
+	content: Anthropic.Messages.MessageParam["content"]
+}
+
+import * as vscode from "vscode"
+
+interface ConversationMetadata {
+	apiProvider: string
+	model: string
+	tokensIn: number
+	tokensOut: number
+}
+
+/**
+ * Service for collecting conversation data using OpenTelemetry
+ */
+export class ConversationTelemetryService {
+	private static instance: ConversationTelemetryService
+	private enabled: boolean = false
+	private distinctId: string
+	private clineApiKey?: string
+	private apiEndpoint: string = "https://api.cline.bot/v1/traces"
+	private tracerProvider: NodeTracerProvider | undefined
+	private tracer: any
+	private messageIndices: Map<string, number> = new Map()
+
+	private constructor(distinctId: string) {
+		this.distinctId = distinctId
+	}
+
+	public static getInstance(distinctId: string): ConversationTelemetryService {
+		if (!ConversationTelemetryService.instance) {
+			ConversationTelemetryService.instance = new ConversationTelemetryService(distinctId)
+		}
+		return ConversationTelemetryService.instance
+	}
+
+	public updateTelemetryState(enabled: boolean, clineApiKey?: string): void {
+		console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] Updating telemetry state...", { enabled, clineApiKey })
+
+		// First update the state variables
+		this.enabled = enabled
path: src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts
user: login: pashpashpash
body: 100%
created_at: 2025-03-12T21:04:33Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
+import { trace, context, SpanKind, SpanStatusCode } from "@opentelemetry/api"
+import { OTLPTraceExporter } from "@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http"
+import { Resource } from "@opentelemetry/resources"
+import { SimpleSpanProcessor } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base"
+import { NodeTracerProvider } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node"
+import { ATTR_SERVICE_NAME, ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION } from "@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions"
+
+import { Anthropic } from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"
+
+export type TelemetryChatMessage = {
+	role: "user" | "assistant" | "system"
+	ts: number
+	content: Anthropic.Messages.MessageParam["content"]
+}
+
+import * as vscode from "vscode"
+
+const { IS_DEV } = process.env
+
+interface ConversationMetadata {
+	apiProvider: string
+	model: string
+	tokensIn: number
+	tokensOut: number
+}
+
+/**
+ * Service for collecting conversation data using OpenTelemetry
+ */
+export class ConversationTelemetryService {
+	private static instance: ConversationTelemetryService
+	private enabled: boolean = false
+	private distinctId: string
+	private clineApiKey?: string
+	private apiEndpoint: string = "https://api.cline.bot/v1/traces"
+	private tracerProvider: NodeTracerProvider | undefined
+	private tracer: any
+	private messageIndices: Map<string, number> = new Map()
+
+	private constructor(distinctId: string) {
+		this.distinctId = distinctId
+	}
+
+	public static getInstance(distinctId: string): ConversationTelemetryService {
+		if (!ConversationTelemetryService.instance) {
+			ConversationTelemetryService.instance = new ConversationTelemetryService(distinctId)
+		}
+		return ConversationTelemetryService.instance
+	}
+
+	public updateTelemetryState(enabled: boolean, clineApiKey?: string): void {
+		console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] Updating telemetry state...", { enabled, clineApiKey })
+
+		// First update the state variables
+		this.enabled = enabled
+		this.clineApiKey = clineApiKey
+
+		// Then initialize the tracer if needed
+		if (this.enabled && !this.tracer && IS_DEV) {
path: src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Using `IS_DEV` directly in the tracer initialization can be error-prone since `process.env` values are strings. Convert `IS_DEV` to a boolean or compare explicitly (e.g., `IS_DEV === 'true'`) to avoid unexpected truthy values (e.g., `'false'` is truthy).
```suggestion
		if (this.enabled && !this.tracer && IS_DEV === 'true') {
```
created_at: 2025-03-12T21:09:37Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -222,6 +227,7 @@
 		"watch:esbuild": "node esbuild.js --watch",
 		"watch:tsc": "tsc --noEmit --watch --project tsconfig.json",
 		"package": "npm run build:webview && npm run check-types && npm run lint && node esbuild.js --production",
+		"dev:package": "IS_DEV=true vsce package",
path: package.json
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Consider using a cross-platform solution (e.g., `cross-env`) to set the `IS_DEV` environment variable, ensuring compatibility across different OS's.
```suggestion
		"dev:package": "cross-env IS_DEV=true vsce package"
```
created_at: 2025-03-12T21:22:29Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -222,6 +227,7 @@
 		"watch:esbuild": "node esbuild.js --watch",
 		"watch:tsc": "tsc --noEmit --watch --project tsconfig.json",
 		"package": "npm run build:webview && npm run check-types && npm run lint && node esbuild.js --production",
+		"dev:package": "IS_DEV=true vsce package",
path: package.json
user: login: dcbartlett
body: no, bad AI... don't do that....
created_at: 2025-03-12T21:29:47Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+import { context, SpanKind, trace } from "@opentelemetry/api"
+import { OTLPTraceExporter } from "@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http"
+import { Resource } from "@opentelemetry/resources"
+import { SimpleSpanProcessor } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base"
+import { NodeTracerProvider } from "@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node"
+import { ATTR_SERVICE_NAME, ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION } from "@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions"
+import { Anthropic } from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"
+import * as vscode from "vscode"
+import { ClineProvider } from "../../core/webview/ClineProvider"
+
+export type TelemetryChatMessage = {
+	role: "user" | "assistant" | "system"
+	ts: number
+	content: Anthropic.Messages.MessageParam["content"]
+}
+
+const { IS_DEV } = process.env
+
+interface ConversationMetadata {
+	apiProvider?: string
+	model?: string
+	tokensIn: number
+	tokensOut: number
+}
+
+/**
+ * Service for collecting conversation data using OpenTelemetry
+ */
+export class ConversationTelemetryService {
+	private providerRef: WeakRef<ClineProvider>
+	private distinctId: string = vscode.env.machineId
+	private apiEndpoint: string = "https://api.cline.bot/v1/traces"
+	private tracerProvider: NodeTracerProvider | undefined
+	private tracer: any
+	private messageIndices: Map<string, number> = new Map()
+
+	constructor(provider: ClineProvider) {
+		this.providerRef = new WeakRef(provider)
+		this.initializeTracer()
+	}
+
+	private async getClineApiKey(): Promise<string | undefined> {
+		const provider = this.providerRef.deref()
+		if (!provider) {
+			return undefined
+		}
+		const { apiConfiguration } = await provider.getStateToPostToWebview()
+		return apiConfiguration?.clineApiKey
+	}
+
+	public isOptedInToConversationTelemetry(): boolean {
+		// First check global telemetry level - telemetry should only be enabled when level is "all"
+		const telemetryLevel = vscode.workspace.getConfiguration("telemetry").get<string>("telemetryLevel", "all")
+		const isGlobalTelemetryEnabled = telemetryLevel === "all"
+
+		// User has to manually opt in to conversation telemetry in Advanced Settings
+		const isConversationTelemetryEnabled =
+			vscode.workspace.getConfiguration("cline").get<boolean>("conversationTelemetry") ?? false
+
+		// Currently only enabled in dev environment
+		const isDevEnvironment = !!IS_DEV
+
+		return isDevEnvironment && isGlobalTelemetryEnabled && isConversationTelemetryEnabled
+	}
+
+	private async initializeTracer() {
+		try {
+			// Create a resource that identifies our service
+			const resource = new Resource({
+				[ATTR_SERVICE_NAME]: "cline-extension",
+				[ATTR_SERVICE_VERSION]: "1.0.0",
+			})
+
+			const clineApiKey = await this.getClineApiKey()
+
+			console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] Initializing OpenTelemetry tracer...", { "this.clineApiKey": clineApiKey })
path: src/services/telemetry/ConversationTelemetryService.ts
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Avoid logging sensitive API keys. On line 76, the tracer initialization log includes `clineApiKey`. Consider removing or masking secrets from console output.
```suggestion
			console.log("[ConversationTelemetry] Initializing OpenTelemetry tracer...")
```
created_at: 2025-03-20T09:43:07Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR

PR comments:
user: login: changeset-bot[bot]
created_at: 2025-03-12T02:31:50Z
body: ###  🦋  Changeset detected

Latest commit: 0040cea2e8afe390d299755f210372eeee1ebb60

**The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.**

<details><summary>This PR includes changesets to release 1 package</summary>

  | Name       | Type  |
| ---------- | ----- |
| claude-dev | Minor |

</details>

Not sure what this means? [Click here  to learn what changesets are](https://github.com/changesets/changesets/blob/main/docs/adding-a-changeset.md).

[Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR](https://github.com/cline/cline/new/pashpashpash/conversation-telemetry?filename=.changeset/tricky-tips-wave.md&value=---%0A%22claude-dev%22%3A%20patch%0A---%0A%0ALLM%20Observability%0A)


author_association: NONE
user: login: github-actions[bot]
created_at: 2025-03-12T11:08:31Z
body: This PR requires a changeset since it includes user-facing changes. Please:

1. Run `npm run changeset` locally
2. Choose the appropriate version bump:
   - `major` for breaking changes (1.0.0 → 2.0.0)
   - `minor` for new features (1.0.0 → 1.1.0)
   - `patch` for bug fixes (1.0.0 → 1.0.1)
3. Write a clear description of your changes
4. Commit the generated changeset file

Note: Documentation-only changes do not require a changeset.
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR