Repository: windmill-labs/windmill
Pull request #5561: chore(main): release 1.482.0
Author: login: rubenfiszel
Labels: name: autorelease: tagged
Created: 2025-04-02T21:35:21Z | Merged: 2025-04-15T19:57:34Z

:robot: I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [1.482.0](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/compare/v1.481.0...v1.482.0) (2025-04-15)


### Features

* add diff toggle to flow inline scripts ([#5550](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5550)) ([b3ecde3](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b3ecde3316252bcd7323de98149786349019ba7e))
* add gcp trigger ([#5501](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5501)) ([6339775](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63397754046eed41d32e28d4698db37b4c9b9710))
* add wildcards filter for worker/label/tags ([62f14d1](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/62f14d1cb95e3f1c7de85c46e1c6bb092247656c))
* add windmill context to autocomplete ([#5548](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5548)) ([b47c151](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b47c15165f93ca68a58f81cf2b86fc9467155482))
* agent workers v2 using http ([#5588](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5588)) ([63fa499](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63fa4990153f33434b49269922f7803d04e407cd))
* Batch re-run ([#5553](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5553)) ([26b5ea5](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/26b5ea5023a100c57d077910c99a5e5703edf1c1))
* **frontend:** app editor code input component (monaco) ([#5566](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5566)) ([177e16b](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/177e16bb18eed0d1c454b967aaa59547f61e8d26))
* handle sending selected lines to ai context ([#5527](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5527)) ([5abdc3e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/5abdc3e4403b5c604309bd99a24d7a2847a17b9b))
* Implement sending diff to ai ([#5510](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5510)) ([e118d2c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/e118d2cd5f9c641884a76229802a5228ef41f1a5))
* make azure a standalone AI provider ([#5558](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5558)) ([2c5e58c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/2c5e58cf1ab9225d516540b38d9e4dde482a3a7f))
* migrate to svelte5 + vite6 ([#4813](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/4813)) ([3c99b3f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3c99b3fdc7b78b1cdc7d8fb21d999296695f7889))
* **postgres-trigger:** postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource ([#5606](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5606)) ([1daeb2f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/1daeb2f48f3026621b3ffc58e10f048d5911906c))
* **python:** per import requirement pin ([#5520](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5520)) ([0b6d017](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/0b6d017fedc31e790a76cf29a1adaaf2a72acc61))
* signed s3 objects ([#5593](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5593)) ([b9e8796](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b9e879618bc223ce17effde8bb4c5d1df2ad6df5))


### Bug Fixes

* add support for ${} syntax without default in bash ([#5594](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5594)) ([3950cfd](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3950cfd7e3297d7f8ec56430d6462f6b67ecd3c2))
* app editor svelte 5 fixes ([#5570](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5570)) ([b926076](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b9260769883348ecd5aeb5684f527a8bf0073928))
* binding not working in nested array script arg ([#5585](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5585)) ([f5d46d5](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/f5d46d5751bc875b7f4da1db06be40571ac55ab8))
* **cli:** properly handle enabled/disabled updates of schedules ([2629458](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/26294584d6c2ca02bbc4fc5f28cb8df6a5fb3790))
* **cli:** wmill-locks improvement ([8d062c4](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/8d062c47ecd9e84a81140d5c59814da9217dd434))
* Dynamic select does not work with tag //native ([#5576](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5576)) ([1f3e7d9](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/1f3e7d9029051832db6ab1755b3cad38176a9e96)), closes [#5490](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5490)
* fix list jobs by tag ([0c3cb37](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/0c3cb3700a3fb9b69e396487bd7491dbbd8861c0))
* flow editor svelte 5 issues ([#5567](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5567)) ([4f6be6e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/4f6be6ed340e26bf1ed95398a9dc9f1eb41b33dd))
* freeze when clicking script history diff button ([#5581](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5581)) ([07094b6](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/07094b6aa21f10688b138d2a81d4fd5833f003fc))
* **frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result ([#5565](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5565)) ([6fae3a5](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/6fae3a566be06dae88ece8ec23f5723cd8f3f2b9))
* **frontend:** load all step jobs ([#5617](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5617)) ([16bed59](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/16bed593dfd0b735a92d0928df5091547b98ae79))
* **frontend:** prevent deploy popover to show if deploy dropdown is open ([#5542](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5542)) ([c2180c6](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/c2180c6eb34e14fe2292ff40aa6a99c627698d5e))
* **frontend:** proper each block binding + better app settings reactivity ([#5568](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5568)) ([4c71af8](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/4c71af8a74627d0ba76917e0dac0ac9e5e984cca))
* improve app image picker UX ([#5589](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5589)) ([f497a4b](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/f497a4bfae8d1bff097e0c2c9df8381a531dfeb9))
* legacy script gen model selection ([#5574](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5574)) ([3507925](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3507925624a43804a3be463b6f7913cea5821384))
* mssql ca_cert deserializing ([#5587](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5587)) ([b4f8c88](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b4f8c88c19bd4f844c3ecb53ececc340ee326b0e))
* number input in app multiselect yields NOT_NUMBER ([#5616](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5616)) ([4aae6ab](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/4aae6ab634280adc1de9abd890100b7c12c89158))
* prevent invalid returned ai completion object errors ([#5564](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5564)) ([9276c71](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/9276c717a21aaee3241845a9cc00d3fb6bce9eb9))
* Remaining svelte 5 bugs ([#5563](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5563)) ([6e9ec63](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/6e9ec6323c265a747ef8696865297e6d47abb016))
* tenant id to never be undefined on teams ([#5572](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5572)) ([102b58a](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/102b58a5f40dde22f15700d4b6c11eb7f3fbf4bb))
* validate saved module before passing to flow module editor ([#5580](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5580)) ([2eb1a16](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/2eb1a161d15627b440195b65eec54998561f4ef6))

---
This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
<!-- ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN -->

----

> [!IMPORTANT]
> Release 1.482.0 with new features like diff toggle, GCP trigger, and Svelte 5 migration, plus various bug fixes.
> 
>   - **Release Version**: Update `version.txt` to 1.482.0.
>   - **Features**:
>     - Add diff toggle to flow inline scripts.
>     - Add GCP trigger and wildcards filter for worker/label/tags.
>     - Add windmill context to autocomplete.
>     - Implement agent workers v2 using HTTP.
>     - Migrate to Svelte 5 and Vite 6.
>     - Add signed S3 objects support.
>   - **Bug Fixes**:
>     - Fix `${}` syntax support in bash without default.
>     - Address Svelte 5 issues in app and flow editors.
>     - Improve CLI schedule updates and wmill-locks.
>     - Fix dynamic select with tag `//native` and list jobs by tag.
>     - Enhance frontend app builder and image picker UX.
> 
> <sup>This description was created by </sup>[<img alt="Ellipsis" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Ellipsis-blue?color=175173">](https://www.ellipsis.dev?ref=windmill-labs%2Fwindmill&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral)<sup> for a9f87d8ca49849f75d8d609733fcc7b7c19ffd79. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.</sup>

<!-- ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN -->


Diff:
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index 3a133b737a8a1..8b440e9a04e6a 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -1,5 +1,50 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [1.482.0](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/compare/v1.481.0...v1.482.0) (2025-04-15)
+
+
+### Features
+
+* add diff toggle to flow inline scripts ([#5550](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5550)) ([b3ecde3](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b3ecde3316252bcd7323de98149786349019ba7e))
+* add gcp trigger ([#5501](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5501)) ([6339775](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63397754046eed41d32e28d4698db37b4c9b9710))
+* add wildcards filter for worker/label/tags ([62f14d1](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/62f14d1cb95e3f1c7de85c46e1c6bb092247656c))
+* add windmill context to autocomplete ([#5548](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5548)) ([b47c151](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b47c15165f93ca68a58f81cf2b86fc9467155482))
+* agent workers v2 using http ([#5588](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5588)) ([63fa499](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63fa4990153f33434b49269922f7803d04e407cd))
+* Batch re-run ([#5553](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5553)) ([26b5ea5](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/26b5ea5023a100c57d077910c99a5e5703edf1c1))
+* **frontend:** app editor code input component (monaco) ([#5566](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5566)) ([177e16b](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/177e16bb18eed0d1c454b967aaa59547f61e8d26))
+* handle sending selected lines to ai context ([#5527](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5527)) ([5abdc3e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/5abdc3e4403b5c604309bd99a24d7a2847a17b9b))
+* Implement sending diff to ai ([#5510](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5510)) ([e118d2c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/e118d2cd5f9c641884a76229802a5228ef41f1a5))
+* make azure a standalone AI provider ([#5558](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5558)) ([2c5e58c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/2c5e58cf1ab9225d516540b38d9e4dde482a3a7f))
+* migrate to svelte5 + vite6 ([#4813](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/4813)) ([3c99b3f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3c99b3fdc7b78b1cdc7d8fb21d999296695f7889))
+* **postgres-trigger:** postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource ([#5606](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5606)) ([1daeb2f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/1daeb2f48f3026621b3ffc58e10f048d5911906c))
+* **python:** per import requirement pin ([#5520](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5520)) ([0b6d017](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/0b6d017fedc31e790a76cf29a1adaaf2a72acc61))
+* signed s3 objects ([#5593](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5593)) ([b9e8796](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b9e879618bc223ce17effde8bb4c5d1df2ad6df5))
+
+
+### Bug Fixes
+
+* add support for ${} syntax without default in bash ([#5594](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5594)) ([3950cfd](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3950cfd7e3297d7f8ec56430d6462f6b67ecd3c2))
+* app editor svelte 5 fixes ([#5570](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5570)) ([b926076](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b9260769883348ecd5aeb5684f527a8bf0073928))
+* binding not working in nested array script arg ([#5585](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5585)) ([f5d46d5](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/f5d46d5751bc875b7f4da1db06be40571ac55ab8))
+* **cli:** properly handle enabled/disabled updates of schedules ([2629458](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/26294584d6c2ca02bbc4fc5f28cb8df6a5fb3790))
+* **cli:** wmill-locks improvement ([8d062c4](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/8d062c47ecd9e84a81140d5c59814da9217dd434))
+* Dynamic select does not work with tag //native ([#5576](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5576)) ([1f3e7d9](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/1f3e7d9029051832db6ab1755b3cad38176a9e96)), closes [#5490](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5490)
+* fix list jobs by tag ([0c3cb37](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/0c3cb3700a3fb9b69e396487bd7491dbbd8861c0))
+* flow editor svelte 5 issues ([#5567](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5567)) ([4f6be6e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/4f6be6ed340e26bf1ed95398a9dc9f1eb41b33dd))
+* freeze when clicking script history diff button ([#5581](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5581)) ([07094b6](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/07094b6aa21f10688b138d2a81d4fd5833f003fc))
+* **frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result ([#5565](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5565)) ([6fae3a5](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/6fae3a566be06dae88ece8ec23f5723cd8f3f2b9))
+* **frontend:** load all step jobs ([#5617](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5617)) ([16bed59](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/16bed593dfd0b735a92d0928df5091547b98ae79))
+* **frontend:** prevent deploy popover to show if deploy dropdown is open ([#5542](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5542)) ([c2180c6](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/c2180c6eb34e14fe2292ff40aa6a99c627698d5e))
+* **frontend:** proper each block binding + better app settings reactivity ([#5568](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5568)) ([4c71af8](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/4c71af8a74627d0ba76917e0dac0ac9e5e984cca))
+* improve app image picker UX ([#5589](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5589)) ([f497a4b](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/f497a4bfae8d1bff097e0c2c9df8381a531dfeb9))
+* legacy script gen model selection ([#5574](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5574)) ([3507925](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3507925624a43804a3be463b6f7913cea5821384))
+* mssql ca_cert deserializing ([#5587](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5587)) ([b4f8c88](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b4f8c88c19bd4f844c3ecb53ececc340ee326b0e))
+* number input in app multiselect yields NOT_NUMBER ([#5616](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5616)) ([4aae6ab](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/4aae6ab634280adc1de9abd890100b7c12c89158))
+* prevent invalid returned ai completion object errors ([#5564](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5564)) ([9276c71](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/9276c717a21aaee3241845a9cc00d3fb6bce9eb9))
+* Remaining svelte 5 bugs ([#5563](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5563)) ([6e9ec63](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/6e9ec6323c265a747ef8696865297e6d47abb016))
+* tenant id to never be undefined on teams ([#5572](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5572)) ([102b58a](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/102b58a5f40dde22f15700d4b6c11eb7f3fbf4bb))
+* validate saved module before passing to flow module editor ([#5580](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5580)) ([2eb1a16](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/2eb1a161d15627b440195b65eec54998561f4ef6))
+
 ## [1.481.0](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/compare/v1.480.1...v1.481.0) (2025-04-02)
 
 
diff --git a/backend/Cargo.lock b/backend/Cargo.lock
index 0f9558966fdde..90ccbcfd85cad 100644
--- a/backend/Cargo.lock
+++ b/backend/Cargo.lock
@@ -225,9 +225,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "anyhow"
-version = "1.0.97"
+version = "1.0.98"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "dcfed56ad506cb2c684a14971b8861fdc3baaaae314b9e5f9bb532cbe3ba7a4f"
+checksum = "e16d2d3311acee920a9eb8d33b8cbc1787ce4a264e85f964c2404b969bdcd487"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "arc-swap"
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "arrow-schema",
  "chrono",
  "half",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "lexical-core",
  "num",
  "serde",
@@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "aws-smithy-async",
  "aws-smithy-runtime-api",
  "aws-smithy-types",
- "h2 0.4.8",
+ "h2 0.4.9",
  "http 0.2.12",
  "http 1.3.1",
  "http-body 0.4.6",
@@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "hyper-util",
  "pin-project-lite",
  "rustls 0.21.12",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "rustls-native-certs 0.8.1",
  "rustls-pki-types",
  "tokio",
@@ -1189,9 +1189,9 @@ checksum = "7b7e4c2464d97fe331d41de9d5db0def0a96f4d823b8b32a2efd503578988973"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "backon"
-version = "1.4.1"
+version = "1.5.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "970d91570c01a8a5959b36ad7dd1c30642df24b6b3068710066f6809f7033bb7"
+checksum = "fd0b50b1b78dbadd44ab18b3c794e496f3a139abb9fbc27d9c94c4eebbb96496"
 dependencies = [
  "fastrand",
  "gloo-timers",
@@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "addr2line",
  "cfg-if",
  "libc",
- "miniz_oxide 0.8.5",
+ "miniz_oxide 0.8.8",
  "object",
  "rustc-demangle",
  "windows-targets 0.52.6",
@@ -1419,9 +1419,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "blake3"
-version = "1.8.0"
+version = "1.8.1"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "34a796731680be7931955498a16a10b2270c7762963d5d570fdbfe02dcbf314f"
+checksum = "389a099b34312839e16420d499a9cad9650541715937ffbdd40d36f49e77eeb3"
 dependencies = [
  "arrayref",
  "arrayvec",
@@ -1591,9 +1591,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "bstr"
-version = "1.11.3"
+version = "1.12.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "531a9155a481e2ee699d4f98f43c0ca4ff8ee1bfd55c31e9e98fb29d2b176fe0"
+checksum = "234113d19d0d7d613b40e86fb654acf958910802bcceab913a4f9e7cda03b1a4"
 dependencies = [
  "memchr",
  "serde",
@@ -1833,9 +1833,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "cc"
-version = "1.2.17"
+version = "1.2.19"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "1fcb57c740ae1daf453ae85f16e37396f672b039e00d9d866e07ddb24e328e3a"
+checksum = "8e3a13707ac958681c13b39b458c073d0d9bc8a22cb1b2f4c8e55eb72c13f362"
 dependencies = [
  "jobserver",
  "libc",
@@ -1975,9 +1975,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "clap"
-version = "4.5.35"
+version = "4.5.36"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "d8aa86934b44c19c50f87cc2790e19f54f7a67aedb64101c2e1a2e5ecfb73944"
+checksum = "2df961d8c8a0d08aa9945718ccf584145eee3f3aa06cddbeac12933781102e04"
 dependencies = [
  "clap_builder",
  "clap_derive",
@@ -1985,9 +1985,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "clap_builder"
-version = "4.5.35"
+version = "4.5.36"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "2414dbb2dd0695280da6ea9261e327479e9d37b0630f6b53ba2a11c60c679fd9"
+checksum = "132dbda40fb6753878316a489d5a1242a8ef2f0d9e47ba01c951ea8aa7d013a5"
 dependencies = [
  "anstream",
  "anstyle",
@@ -2321,9 +2321,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "crossbeam-channel"
-version = "0.5.14"
+version = "0.5.15"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "06ba6d68e24814cb8de6bb986db8222d3a027d15872cabc0d18817bc3c0e4471"
+checksum = "82b8f8f868b36967f9606790d1903570de9ceaf870a7bf9fbbd3016d636a2cb2"
 dependencies = [
  "crossbeam-utils",
 ]
@@ -2588,9 +2588,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "data-encoding"
-version = "2.8.0"
+version = "2.9.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "575f75dfd25738df5b91b8e43e14d44bda14637a58fae779fd2b064f8bf3e010"
+checksum = "2a2330da5de22e8a3cb63252ce2abb30116bf5265e89c0e01bc17015ce30a476"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "data-url"
@@ -2632,7 +2632,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "glob",
  "half",
  "hashbrown 0.14.5",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "itertools 0.12.1",
  "log",
  "num_cpus",
@@ -2801,7 +2801,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "datafusion-expr",
  "datafusion-physical-expr",
  "hashbrown 0.14.5",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "itertools 0.12.1",
  "log",
  "regex-syntax 0.8.5",
@@ -2830,7 +2830,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "half",
  "hashbrown 0.14.5",
  "hex",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "itertools 0.12.1",
  "log",
  "paste",
@@ -2874,7 +2874,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "futures",
  "half",
  "hashbrown 0.14.5",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "itertools 0.12.1",
  "log",
  "once_cell",
@@ -3006,7 +3006,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "deno_media_type",
  "deno_path_util",
  "http 1.3.1",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "log",
  "once_cell",
  "parking_lot 0.12.3",
@@ -3047,7 +3047,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "glob",
  "ignore",
  "import_map",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "jsonc-parser",
  "log",
  "percent-encoding",
@@ -3088,7 +3088,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "deno_path_util",
  "deno_unsync",
  "futures",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "libc",
  "memoffset",
  "parking_lot 0.12.3",
@@ -3211,7 +3211,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "deno_tls",
  "dyn-clone",
  "error_reporter",
- "h2 0.4.8",
+ "h2 0.4.9",
  "hickory-resolver",
  "http 1.3.1",
  "http-body-util",
@@ -3492,14 +3492,14 @@ dependencies = [
  "elliptic-curve",
  "errno",
  "faster-hex",
- "h2 0.4.8",
+ "h2 0.4.9",
  "hkdf",
  "http 1.3.1",
  "http-body-util",
  "hyper 1.6.0",
  "hyper-util",
  "idna",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "ipnetwork",
  "k256",
  "lazy-regex",
@@ -3575,7 +3575,7 @@ version = "0.212.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "c2d328067139909aa81522a5d90f119368b541fbddd73ab630e4d9f777865f0d"
 dependencies = [
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "proc-macro-rules",
  "proc-macro2",
  "quote",
@@ -3619,7 +3619,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "deno_error",
  "deno_path_util",
  "deno_semver",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "serde",
  "serde_json",
  "sys_traits",
@@ -3856,7 +3856,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "deno_core",
  "deno_error",
  "deno_native_certs",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "rustls-pemfile 2.2.0",
  "rustls-tokio-stream",
  "rustls-webpki 0.102.8",
@@ -3948,7 +3948,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "deno_permissions",
  "deno_tls",
  "fastwebsockets",
- "h2 0.4.8",
+ "h2 0.4.9",
  "http 1.3.1",
  "http-body-util",
  "hyper 1.6.0",
@@ -4089,9 +4089,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "deranged"
-version = "0.4.1"
+version = "0.4.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "28cfac68e08048ae1883171632c2aef3ebc555621ae56fbccce1cbf22dd7f058"
+checksum = "9c9e6a11ca8224451684bc0d7d5a7adbf8f2fd6887261a1cfc3c0432f9d4068e"
 dependencies = [
  "powerfmt",
  "serde",
@@ -4424,9 +4424,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "ecow"
-version = "0.2.3"
+version = "0.2.4"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "e42fc0a93992b20c58b99e59d61eaf1635a25bfbe49e4275c34ba0aee98119ba"
+checksum = "ef5eeffa816451f3a6a4cce9cd796e3e5ba6018638d3ce5cc7f87b73bababf60"
 dependencies = [
  "serde",
 ]
@@ -4573,9 +4573,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "errno"
-version = "0.3.10"
+version = "0.3.11"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "33d852cb9b869c2a9b3df2f71a3074817f01e1844f839a144f5fcef059a4eb5d"
+checksum = "976dd42dc7e85965fe702eb8164f21f450704bdde31faefd6471dba214cb594e"
 dependencies = [
  "libc",
  "windows-sys 0.59.0",
@@ -4784,7 +4784,7 @@ checksum = "7ced92e76e966ca2fd84c8f7aa01a4aea65b0eb6648d72f7c8f3e2764a67fece"
 dependencies = [
  "crc32fast",
  "libz-sys",
- "miniz_oxide 0.8.5",
+ "miniz_oxide 0.8.8",
 ]
 
 [[package]]
@@ -5536,7 +5536,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "futures-sink",
  "futures-util",
  "http 0.2.12",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "slab",
  "tokio",
  "tokio-util",
@@ -5545,9 +5545,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "h2"
-version = "0.4.8"
+version = "0.4.9"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "5017294ff4bb30944501348f6f8e42e6ad28f42c8bbef7a74029aff064a4e3c2"
+checksum = "75249d144030531f8dee69fe9cea04d3edf809a017ae445e2abdff6629e86633"
 dependencies = [
  "atomic-waker",
  "bytes",
@@ -5555,7 +5555,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "futures-core",
  "futures-sink",
  "http 1.3.1",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "slab",
  "tokio",
  "tokio-util",
@@ -5794,13 +5794,13 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "hostname"
-version = "0.4.0"
+version = "0.4.1"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "f9c7c7c8ac16c798734b8a24560c1362120597c40d5e1459f09498f8f6c8f2ba"
+checksum = "a56f203cd1c76362b69e3863fd987520ac36cf70a8c92627449b2f64a8cf7d65"
 dependencies = [
  "cfg-if",
  "libc",
- "windows 0.52.0",
+ "windows-link",
 ]
 
 [[package]]
@@ -5930,7 +5930,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "bytes",
  "futures-channel",
  "futures-util",
- "h2 0.4.8",
+ "h2 0.4.9",
  "http 1.3.1",
  "http-body 1.0.1",
  "httparse",
@@ -5983,7 +5983,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "http 1.3.1",
  "hyper 1.6.0",
  "hyper-util",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "rustls-native-certs 0.8.1",
  "rustls-pki-types",
  "tokio",
@@ -6281,7 +6281,7 @@ checksum = "1215d4d92511fbbdaea50e750e91f2429598ef817f02b579158e92803b52c00a"
 dependencies = [
  "boxed_error",
  "deno_error",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "log",
  "percent-encoding",
  "serde",
@@ -6303,9 +6303,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "indexmap"
-version = "2.8.0"
+version = "2.9.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "3954d50fe15b02142bf25d3b8bdadb634ec3948f103d04ffe3031bc8fe9d7058"
+checksum = "cea70ddb795996207ad57735b50c5982d8844f38ba9ee5f1aedcfb708a2aa11e"
 dependencies = [
  "equivalent",
  "hashbrown 0.15.2",
@@ -6587,7 +6587,7 @@ version = "0.4.2"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "4ee7893dab2e44ae5f9d0173f26ff4aa327c10b01b06a72b52dd9405b628640d"
 dependencies = [
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
 ]
 
 [[package]]
@@ -6758,9 +6758,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "libc"
-version = "0.2.171"
+version = "0.2.172"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "c19937216e9d3aa9956d9bb8dfc0b0c8beb6058fc4f7a4dc4d850edf86a237d6"
+checksum = "d750af042f7ef4f724306de029d18836c26c1765a54a6a3f094cbd23a7267ffa"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "libffi"
@@ -6826,7 +6826,7 @@ checksum = "c0ff37bd590ca25063e35af745c343cb7a0271906fb7b37e4813e8f79f00268d"
 dependencies = [
  "bitflags 2.9.0",
  "libc",
- "redox_syscall 0.5.10",
+ "redox_syscall 0.5.11",
 ]
 
 [[package]]
@@ -6877,9 +6877,9 @@ checksum = "d26c52dbd32dccf2d10cac7725f8eae5296885fb5703b261f7d0a0739ec807ab"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "linux-raw-sys"
-version = "0.9.3"
+version = "0.9.4"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "fe7db12097d22ec582439daf8618b8fdd1a7bef6270e9af3b1ebcd30893cf413"
+checksum = "cd945864f07fe9f5371a27ad7b52a172b4b499999f1d97574c9fa68373937e12"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "litemap"
@@ -7041,7 +7041,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "base64 0.22.1",
  "gethostname",
  "mail-builder",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "rustls-pki-types",
  "smtp-proto",
  "tokio",
@@ -7310,9 +7310,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "miniz_oxide"
-version = "0.8.5"
+version = "0.8.8"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "8e3e04debbb59698c15bacbb6d93584a8c0ca9cc3213cb423d31f760d8843ce5"
+checksum = "3be647b768db090acb35d5ec5db2b0e1f1de11133ca123b9eacf5137868f892a"
 dependencies = [
  "adler2",
  "simd-adler32",
@@ -7509,7 +7509,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "bitflags 2.9.0",
  "codespan-reporting",
  "hexf-parse",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "log",
  "num-traits",
  "rustc-hash 1.1.0",
@@ -7798,7 +7798,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "dirs-sys 0.4.1",
  "fancy-regex",
  "heck 0.5.0",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "log",
  "lru",
  "miette",
@@ -8186,9 +8186,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "openssl"
-version = "0.10.71"
+version = "0.10.72"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "5e14130c6a98cd258fdcb0fb6d744152343ff729cbfcb28c656a9d12b999fbcd"
+checksum = "fedfea7d58a1f73118430a55da6a286e7b044961736ce96a16a17068ea25e5da"
 dependencies = [
  "bitflags 2.9.0",
  "cfg-if",
@@ -8218,18 +8218,18 @@ checksum = "d05e27ee213611ffe7d6348b942e8f942b37114c00cc03cec254295a4a17852e"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "openssl-src"
-version = "300.4.2+3.4.1"
+version = "300.5.0+3.5.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "168ce4e058f975fe43e89d9ccf78ca668601887ae736090aacc23ae353c298e2"
+checksum = "e8ce546f549326b0e6052b649198487d91320875da901e7bd11a06d1ee3f9c2f"
 dependencies = [
  "cc",
 ]
 
 [[package]]
 name = "openssl-sys"
-version = "0.9.106"
+version = "0.9.107"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "8bb61ea9811cc39e3c2069f40b8b8e2e70d8569b361f879786cc7ed48b777cdd"
+checksum = "8288979acd84749c744a9014b4382d42b8f7b2592847b5afb2ed29e5d16ede07"
 dependencies = [
  "cc",
  "libc",
@@ -8522,7 +8522,7 @@ checksum = "1e401f977ab385c9e4e3ab30627d6f26d00e2c73eef317493c4ec6d468726cf8"
 dependencies = [
  "cfg-if",
  "libc",
- "redox_syscall 0.5.10",
+ "redox_syscall 0.5.11",
  "smallvec",
  "windows-targets 0.52.6",
 ]
@@ -8652,7 +8652,7 @@ source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "b4c5cc86750666a3ed20bdaf5ca2a0344f9c67674cae0515bec2da16fbaa47db"
 dependencies = [
  "fixedbitset 0.4.2",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
 ]
 
 [[package]]
@@ -8662,7 +8662,7 @@ source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "3672b37090dbd86368a4145bc067582552b29c27377cad4e0a306c97f9bd7772"
 dependencies = [
  "fixedbitset 0.5.7",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
 ]
 
 [[package]]
@@ -8824,7 +8824,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "crc32fast",
  "fdeflate",
  "flate2",
- "miniz_oxide 0.8.5",
+ "miniz_oxide 0.8.8",
 ]
 
 [[package]]
@@ -8953,9 +8953,9 @@ checksum = "c6fa0831dd7cc608c38a5e323422a0077678fa5744aa2be4ad91c4ece8eec8d5"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "prettyplease"
-version = "0.2.31"
+version = "0.2.32"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "5316f57387668042f561aae71480de936257848f9c43ce528e311d89a07cadeb"
+checksum = "664ec5419c51e34154eec046ebcba56312d5a2fc3b09a06da188e1ad21afadf6"
 dependencies = [
  "proc-macro2",
  "syn 2.0.100",
@@ -9281,7 +9281,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "quinn-proto",
  "quinn-udp",
  "rustc-hash 2.1.1",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "socket2",
  "thiserror 2.0.12",
  "tokio",
@@ -9300,7 +9300,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "rand 0.9.0",
  "ring 0.17.14",
  "rustc-hash 2.1.1",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "rustls-pki-types",
  "slab",
  "thiserror 2.0.12",
@@ -9534,9 +9534,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "redox_syscall"
-version = "0.5.10"
+version = "0.5.11"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "0b8c0c260b63a8219631167be35e6a988e9554dbd323f8bd08439c8ed1302bd1"
+checksum = "d2f103c6d277498fbceb16e84d317e2a400f160f46904d5f5410848c829511a3"
 dependencies = [
  "bitflags 2.9.0",
 ]
@@ -9691,7 +9691,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "encoding_rs",
  "futures-core",
  "futures-util",
- "h2 0.4.8",
+ "h2 0.4.9",
  "http 1.3.1",
  "http-body 1.0.1",
  "http-body-util",
@@ -9708,7 +9708,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "percent-encoding",
  "pin-project-lite",
  "quinn",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "rustls-native-certs 0.8.1",
  "rustls-pemfile 2.2.0",
  "rustls-pki-types",
@@ -9734,9 +9734,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "reqwest-middleware"
-version = "0.4.1"
+version = "0.4.2"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "64e8975513bd9a7a43aad01030e79b3498e05db14e9d945df6483e8cf9b8c4c4"
+checksum = "57f17d28a6e6acfe1733fe24bcd30774d13bffa4b8a22535b4c8c98423088d4e"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "async-trait",
@@ -10065,7 +10065,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "bitflags 2.9.0",
  "errno",
  "libc",
- "linux-raw-sys 0.9.3",
+ "linux-raw-sys 0.9.4",
  "windows-sys 0.59.0",
 ]
 
@@ -10097,9 +10097,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "rustls"
-version = "0.23.25"
+version = "0.23.26"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "822ee9188ac4ec04a2f0531e55d035fb2de73f18b41a63c70c2712503b6fb13c"
+checksum = "df51b5869f3a441595eac5e8ff14d486ff285f7b8c0df8770e49c3b56351f0f0"
 dependencies = [
  "aws-lc-rs",
  "log",
@@ -10182,7 +10182,7 @@ source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "22557157d7395bc30727745b365d923f1ecc230c4c80b176545f3f4f08c46e33"
 dependencies = [
  "futures",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "socket2",
  "tokio",
 ]
@@ -10618,7 +10618,7 @@ version = "1.0.140"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "20068b6e96dc6c9bd23e01df8827e6c7e1f2fddd43c21810382803c136b99373"
 dependencies = [
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "itoa",
  "memchr",
  "ryu",
@@ -10709,7 +10709,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "chrono",
  "hex",
  "indexmap 1.9.3",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "serde",
  "serde_derive",
  "serde_json",
@@ -10947,9 +10947,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "smallvec"
-version = "1.14.0"
+version = "1.15.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "7fcf8323ef1faaee30a44a340193b1ac6814fd9b7b4e88e9d4519a3e4abe1cfd"
+checksum = "8917285742e9f3e1683f0a9c4e6b57960b7314d0b08d30d1ecd426713ee2eee9"
 dependencies = [
  "serde",
 ]
@@ -11132,9 +11132,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "sqlx"
-version = "0.8.3"
+version = "0.8.4"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "4410e73b3c0d8442c5f99b425d7a435b5ee0ae4167b3196771dd3f7a01be745f"
+checksum = "14e22987355fbf8cfb813a0cf8cd97b1b4ec834b94dbd759a9e8679d41fabe83"
 dependencies = [
  "sqlx-core",
  "sqlx-macros",
@@ -11145,10 +11145,11 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "sqlx-core"
-version = "0.8.3"
+version = "0.8.4"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "6a007b6936676aa9ab40207cde35daab0a04b823be8ae004368c0793b96a61e0"
+checksum = "55c4720d7d4cd3d5b00f61d03751c685ad09c33ae8290c8a2c11335e0604300b"
 dependencies = [
+ "base64 0.22.1",
  "bigdecimal",
  "bytes",
  "chrono",
@@ -11162,13 +11163,12 @@ dependencies = [
  "futures-util",
  "hashbrown 0.15.2",
  "hashlink 0.10.0",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "log",
  "memchr",
  "once_cell",
  "percent-encoding",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
- "rustls-pemfile 2.2.0",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "serde",
  "serde_json",
  "sha2 0.10.8",
@@ -11184,9 +11184,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "sqlx-macros"
-version = "0.8.3"
+version = "0.8.4"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "3112e2ad78643fef903618d78cf0aec1cb3134b019730edb039b69eaf531f310"
+checksum = "175147fcb75f353ac7675509bc58abb2cb291caf0fd24a3623b8f7e3eb0a754b"
 dependencies = [
  "proc-macro2",
  "quote",
@@ -11197,9 +11197,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "sqlx-macros-core"
-version = "0.8.3"
+version = "0.8.4"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "4e9f90acc5ab146a99bf5061a7eb4976b573f560bc898ef3bf8435448dd5e7ad"
+checksum = "1cde983058e53bfa75998e1982086c5efe3c370f3250bf0357e344fa3352e32b"
 dependencies = [
  "dotenvy",
  "either",
@@ -11223,9 +11223,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "sqlx-mysql"
-version = "0.8.3"
+version = "0.8.4"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "4560278f0e00ce64938540546f59f590d60beee33fffbd3b9cd47851e5fff233"
+checksum = "847d2e5393a4f39e47e4f36cab419709bc2b83cbe4223c60e86e1471655be333"
 dependencies = [
  "atoi",
  "base64 0.22.1",
@@ -11268,9 +11268,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "sqlx-postgres"
-version = "0.8.3"
+version = "0.8.4"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "c5b98a57f363ed6764d5b3a12bfedf62f07aa16e1856a7ddc2a0bb190a959613"
+checksum = "cc35947a541b9e0a2e3d85da444f1c4137c13040267141b208395a0d0ca4659f"
 dependencies = [
  "atoi",
  "base64 0.22.1",
@@ -11309,9 +11309,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "sqlx-sqlite"
-version = "0.8.3"
+version = "0.8.4"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "f85ca71d3a5b24e64e1d08dd8fe36c6c95c339a896cc33068148906784620540"
+checksum = "6c48291dac4e5ed32da0927a0b981788be65674aeb62666d19873ab4289febde"
 dependencies = [
  "atoi",
  "chrono",
@@ -11327,6 +11327,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "serde",
  "serde_urlencoded",
  "sqlx-core",
+ "thiserror 2.0.12",
  "tracing",
  "url",
  "uuid",
@@ -11561,7 +11562,7 @@ source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "4740e53eaf68b101203c1df0937d5161a29f3c13bceed0836ddfe245b72dd000"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "serde",
  "serde_json",
  "swc_cached",
@@ -11673,7 +11674,7 @@ checksum = "65f21494e75d0bd8ef42010b47cabab9caaed8f2207570e809f6f4eb51a710d1"
 dependencies = [
  "better_scoped_tls",
  "bitflags 2.9.0",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "once_cell",
  "phf",
  "rustc-hash 1.1.0",
@@ -11742,7 +11743,7 @@ checksum = "76c76d8b9792ce51401d38da0fa62158d61f6d80d16d68fe5b03ce4bf5fba383"
 dependencies = [
  "base64 0.21.7",
  "dashmap",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "once_cell",
  "serde",
  "sha1",
@@ -11782,7 +11783,7 @@ version = "0.134.2"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "029eec7dd485923a75b5a45befd04510288870250270292fc2c1b3a9e7547408"
 dependencies = [
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "num_cpus",
  "once_cell",
  "rustc-hash 1.1.0",
@@ -12466,9 +12467,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "tokio"
-version = "1.44.1"
+version = "1.44.2"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "f382da615b842244d4b8738c82ed1275e6c5dd90c459a30941cd07080b06c91a"
+checksum = "e6b88822cbe49de4185e3a4cbf8321dd487cf5fe0c5c65695fef6346371e9c48"
 dependencies = [
  "backtrace",
  "bytes",
@@ -12614,7 +12615,7 @@ version = "0.26.2"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "8e727b36a1a0e8b74c376ac2211e40c2c8af09fb4013c60d910495810f008e9b"
 dependencies = [
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "tokio",
 ]
 
@@ -12735,7 +12736,7 @@ version = "0.19.15"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "1b5bb770da30e5cbfde35a2d7b9b8a2c4b8ef89548a7a6aeab5c9a576e3e7421"
 dependencies = [
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "serde",
  "serde_spanned",
  "toml_datetime",
@@ -12748,9 +12749,9 @@ version = "0.22.24"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "17b4795ff5edd201c7cd6dca065ae59972ce77d1b80fa0a84d94950ece7d1474"
 dependencies = [
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "toml_datetime",
- "winnow 0.7.4",
+ "winnow 0.7.6",
 ]
 
 [[package]]
@@ -12765,7 +12766,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "base64 0.22.1",
  "bytes",
  "flate2",
- "h2 0.4.8",
+ "h2 0.4.9",
  "http 1.3.1",
  "http-body 1.0.1",
  "http-body-util",
@@ -13373,7 +13374,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "log",
  "native-tls",
  "once_cell",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "rustls-pki-types",
  "serde",
  "serde_json",
@@ -13482,7 +13483,7 @@ checksum = "97599c400fc79925922b58303e98fcb8fa88f573379a08ddb652e72cbd2e70f6"
 dependencies = [
  "bitflags 2.9.0",
  "encoding_rs",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "num-bigint",
  "serde",
  "thiserror 1.0.69",
@@ -13766,7 +13767,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "cfg_aliases 0.1.1",
  "codespan-reporting",
  "document-features",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "log",
  "naga",
  "once_cell",
@@ -13867,7 +13868,7 @@ version = "1.6.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
 checksum = "6994d13118ab492c3c80c1f81928718159254c53c472bf9ce36f8dae4add02a7"
 dependencies = [
- "redox_syscall 0.5.10",
+ "redox_syscall 0.5.11",
  "wasite",
  "web-sys",
 ]
@@ -13911,7 +13912,7 @@ checksum = "712e227841d057c1ee1cd2fb22fa7e5a5461ae8e48fa2ca79ec42cfc1931183f"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "axum",
@@ -13931,7 +13932,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "quote",
  "rand 0.9.0",
  "reqwest 0.12.15",
- "rustls 0.23.25",
+ "rustls 0.23.26",
  "serde",
  "serde_json",
  "sha1",
@@ -13958,7 +13959,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-api"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "argon2",
@@ -14065,7 +14066,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-api-client"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "base64 0.22.1",
  "chrono",
@@ -14080,7 +14081,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-audit"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "chrono",
  "serde",
@@ -14093,7 +14094,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-autoscaling"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "serde",
@@ -14107,7 +14108,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-common"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "async-stream",
@@ -14129,7 +14130,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "hex",
  "hmac",
  "hyper 1.6.0",
- "indexmap 2.8.0",
+ "indexmap 2.9.0",
  "itertools 0.14.0",
  "jsonwebtoken 8.3.0",
  "lazy_static",
@@ -14171,7 +14172,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-git-sync"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "regex",
  "serde",
@@ -14185,7 +14186,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-indexer"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "bytes",
@@ -14208,7 +14209,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-macros"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "itertools 0.14.0",
  "lazy_static",
@@ -14220,7 +14221,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "convert_case 0.6.0",
  "serde",
@@ -14229,7 +14230,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-bash"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "lazy_static",
@@ -14241,7 +14242,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-csharp"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "serde_json",
@@ -14253,7 +14254,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-go"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "gosyn",
@@ -14265,7 +14266,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-graphql"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "lazy_static",
@@ -14277,7 +14278,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-java"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "serde_json",
@@ -14289,7 +14290,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-nu"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "nu-parser",
@@ -14300,7 +14301,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-php"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "itertools 0.14.0",
@@ -14311,7 +14312,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-py"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "itertools 0.14.0",
@@ -14322,7 +14323,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-py-imports"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "async-recursion",
@@ -14342,7 +14343,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-rust"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "convert_case 0.6.0",
@@ -14359,7 +14360,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-sql"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "lazy_static",
@@ -14371,7 +14372,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-ts"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "lazy_static",
@@ -14389,7 +14390,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-wasm"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "getrandom 0.2.15",
@@ -14413,7 +14414,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-parser-yaml"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "serde_json",
@@ -14423,7 +14424,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-queue"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "async-recursion",
@@ -14456,7 +14457,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-sql-datatype-parser-wasm"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "wasm-bindgen",
  "wasm-bindgen-test",
@@ -14466,7 +14467,7 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "windmill-worker"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 dependencies = [
  "anyhow",
  "async-recursion",
@@ -14554,16 +14555,6 @@ dependencies = [
  "yaml-rust",
 ]
 
-[[package]]
-name = "windows"
-version = "0.52.0"
-source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "e48a53791691ab099e5e2ad123536d0fff50652600abaf43bbf952894110d0be"
-dependencies = [
- "windows-core 0.52.0",
- "windows-targets 0.52.6",
-]
-
 [[package]]
 name = "windows"
 version = "0.56.0"
@@ -14594,15 +14585,6 @@ dependencies = [
  "windows-targets 0.52.6",
 ]
 
-[[package]]
-name = "windows-core"
-version = "0.52.0"
-source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "33ab640c8d7e35bf8ba19b884ba838ceb4fba93a4e8c65a9059d08afcfc683d9"
-dependencies = [
- "windows-targets 0.52.6",
-]
-
 [[package]]
 name = "windows-core"
 version = "0.56.0"
@@ -15045,9 +15027,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "winnow"
-version = "0.7.4"
+version = "0.7.6"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "0e97b544156e9bebe1a0ffbc03484fc1ffe3100cbce3ffb17eac35f7cdd7ab36"
+checksum = "63d3fcd9bba44b03821e7d699eeee959f3126dcc4aa8e4ae18ec617c2a5cea10"
 dependencies = [
  "memchr",
 ]
@@ -15145,9 +15127,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "xml-rs"
-version = "0.8.25"
+version = "0.8.26"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "c5b940ebc25896e71dd073bad2dbaa2abfe97b0a391415e22ad1326d9c54e3c4"
+checksum = "a62ce76d9b56901b19a74f19431b0d8b3bc7ca4ad685a746dfd78ca8f4fc6bda"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "xmlparser"
diff --git a/backend/Cargo.toml b/backend/Cargo.toml
index ed4155f49552f..8e718debbabb0 100644
--- a/backend/Cargo.toml
+++ b/backend/Cargo.toml
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [package]
 name = "windmill"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 authors.workspace = true
 edition.workspace = true
 
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ members = [
 ]
 
 [workspace.package]
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 authors = ["Ruben Fiszel <ruben@windmill.dev>"]
 edition = "2021"
 
diff --git a/backend/windmill-api/openapi.yaml b/backend/windmill-api/openapi.yaml
index 5ed653793151c..55eea24d23e5c 100644
--- a/backend/windmill-api/openapi.yaml
+++ b/backend/windmill-api/openapi.yaml
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 openapi: "3.0.3"
 
 info:
-  version: 1.481.0
+  version: 1.482.0
   title: Windmill API
 
   contact:
@@ -6623,7 +6623,7 @@ paths:
                         type: object
                         additionalProperties:
                           $ref: "#/components/schemas/InputTransform"
-                      use_latest_version: boolean
+                      use_latest_version: 1.482.0
                 flow_options_by_path:
                   type: object
                   additionalProperties:
@@ -6633,7 +6633,7 @@ paths:
                         type: object
                         additionalProperties:
                           $ref: "#/components/schemas/InputTransform"
-                      use_latest_version: boolean
+                      use_latest_version: 1.482.0
       responses:
         "201":
           description: stream of created job uuids separated by \n. Lines may start with 'Error:'
diff --git a/benchmarks/lib.ts b/benchmarks/lib.ts
index a4fc35045b5e6..3f4a8ed24ea9f 100644
--- a/benchmarks/lib.ts
+++ b/benchmarks/lib.ts
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { sleep } from "https://deno.land/x/sleep@v1.2.1/mod.ts";
 import * as windmill from "https://deno.land/x/windmill@v1.174.0/mod.ts";
 import * as api from "https://deno.land/x/windmill@v1.174.0/windmill-api/index.ts";
 
-export const VERSION = "v1.481.0";
+export const VERSION = "v1.482.0";
 
 export async function login(email: string, password: string): Promise<string> {
   return await windmill.UserService.login({
diff --git a/cli/main.ts b/cli/main.ts
index 92131ce63b93c..84e30a4bdb531 100644
--- a/cli/main.ts
+++ b/cli/main.ts
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ export {
 //   }
 // });
 
-export const VERSION = "1.481.0";
+export const VERSION = "1.482.0";
 
 const command = new Command()
   .name("wmill")
diff --git a/frontend/package-lock.json b/frontend/package-lock.json
index 207f5b22f533f..69cfe8c20a781 100644
--- a/frontend/package-lock.json
+++ b/frontend/package-lock.json
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
 	"name": "windmill-components",
-	"version": "1.481.0",
+	"version": "1.482.0",
 	"lockfileVersion": 3,
 	"requires": true,
 	"packages": {
 		"": {
 			"name": "windmill-components",
-			"version": "1.481.0",
+			"version": "1.482.0",
 			"license": "AGPL-3.0",
 			"dependencies": {
 				"@aws-crypto/sha256-js": "^4.0.0",
diff --git a/frontend/package.json b/frontend/package.json
index 5d0e13fe3f842..e37e03865a6a6 100644
--- a/frontend/package.json
+++ b/frontend/package.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
 	"name": "windmill-components",
-	"version": "1.481.0",
+	"version": "1.482.0",
 	"scripts": {
 		"dev": "vite dev",
 		"build": "vite build",
diff --git a/lsp/Pipfile b/lsp/Pipfile
index 4128f31f602dc..45e4c17df24be 100644
--- a/lsp/Pipfile
+++ b/lsp/Pipfile
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ verify_ssl = true
 name = "pypi"
 
 [packages]
-wmill = ">=1.481.0"
-wmill_pg = ">=1.481.0"
+wmill = ">=1.482.0"
+wmill_pg = ">=1.482.0"
 sendgrid = "*"
 mysql-connector-python = "*"
 pymongo = "*"
diff --git a/openflow.openapi.yaml b/openflow.openapi.yaml
index de1b475a9446a..6724dce66bc0d 100644
--- a/openflow.openapi.yaml
+++ b/openflow.openapi.yaml
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 openapi: "3.0.3"
 
 info:
-  version: 1.481.0
+  version: 1.482.0
   title: OpenFlow Spec
   contact:
     name: Ruben Fiszel
diff --git a/powershell-client/WindmillClient/WindmillClient.psd1 b/powershell-client/WindmillClient/WindmillClient.psd1
index 7a205b98f7616..220bbd7a30e7b 100644
--- a/powershell-client/WindmillClient/WindmillClient.psd1
+++ b/powershell-client/WindmillClient/WindmillClient.psd1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
     RootModule        = 'WindmillClient.psm1'
 
     # Version number of this module.
-    ModuleVersion     = '1.481.0'
+    ModuleVersion     = '1.482.0'
 
     # Supported PSEditions
     # CompatiblePSEditions = @()
diff --git a/python-client/wmill/pyproject.toml b/python-client/wmill/pyproject.toml
index aa01391777ef2..0d460bfc455cf 100644
--- a/python-client/wmill/pyproject.toml
+++ b/python-client/wmill/pyproject.toml
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [tool.poetry]
 name = "wmill"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 description = "A client library for accessing Windmill server wrapping the Windmill client API"
 license = "Apache-2.0"
 homepage = "https://windmill.dev"
diff --git a/python-client/wmill_pg/pyproject.toml b/python-client/wmill_pg/pyproject.toml
index 60c0cbd72827b..24aff1ad80d7d 100644
--- a/python-client/wmill_pg/pyproject.toml
+++ b/python-client/wmill_pg/pyproject.toml
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [tool.poetry]
 name = "wmill-pg"
-version = "1.481.0"
+version = "1.482.0"
 description = "An extension client for the wmill client library focused on pg"
 license = "Apache-2.0"
 homepage = "https://windmill.dev"
diff --git a/typescript-client/jsr.json b/typescript-client/jsr.json
index e37ca23e7f019..6ad1b20d4f13c 100644
--- a/typescript-client/jsr.json
+++ b/typescript-client/jsr.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@windmill/windmill",
-  "version": "1.481.0",
+  "version": "1.482.0",
   "exports": "./src/index.ts",
   "publish": {
     "exclude": ["!src", "./s3Types.ts", "./client.ts"]
diff --git a/typescript-client/package.json b/typescript-client/package.json
index 14be6fa471517..5970770b2b803 100644
--- a/typescript-client/package.json
+++ b/typescript-client/package.json
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "windmill-client",
   "description": "Windmill SDK client for browsers and Node.js",
-  "version": "1.481.0",
+  "version": "1.482.0",
   "author": "Ruben Fiszel",
   "license": "Apache 2.0",
   "devDependencies": {
diff --git a/version.txt b/version.txt
index 11ccffe4f9734..5645e944ef541 100644
--- a/version.txt
+++ b/version.txt
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1.481.0
+1.482.0


Reviews:
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 0523d0700bca0fe7dc4b8108ff7389f6019aecce in <ellipsistime>55 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `24` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0; ensure alignment with CHANGELOG.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0; ensure all version references are consistent.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing and spacing framework names for clarity and consistency. Instead of 'svelte5 + vite6', use 'Svelte 5 and Vite 6' or a similar formatting that matches standard conventions.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 50% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a change made in the diff, specifically the addition of 'svelte5 + vite6' in the changelog. The suggestion to capitalize and space the framework names is a matter of style and consistency, which could be considered a code quality improvement. However, it is not a critical issue that requires a code change.
The comment might be seen as unimportant since it deals with stylistic preferences rather than a functional issue. The changelog is often less formal, and the current format might be acceptable.
While the comment addresses a stylistic issue, maintaining consistency in documentation can be important for readability and professionalism.
The comment addresses a stylistic issue in the changelog, which is related to the changes made in the diff. It is not a critical issue but could be considered a minor improvement for consistency.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_e4kCkQziVfr1ZgWz`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-02T21:36:24Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 9ea243562999205e0617ab4d8643b13f29106ce6 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 0 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `29` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump looks correct; ensure consistency with all version references.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0 looks correct. Ensure consistency with the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There's an inconsistency in how product names are written. In the Features section, the bullet says '* migrate to svelte5 + vite6' while in the Bug Fixes section it says '* Remaining svelte 5 bugs'. Consider using a consistent naming convention (e.g., 'Svelte 5' and 'Vite 6') throughout the changelog for clarity and consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a stylistic inconsistency in the changelog, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to comment on purely informative or unimportant issues, and this seems to fall into that category. The inconsistency does not affect the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be crucial for understanding and maintaining the project.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments on code changes and logic over stylistic issues in documentation. This comment does not address a code change or logic issue.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change or logic issue, and it addresses a stylistic inconsistency in documentation.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_4BL8uvDQedtFCKpS`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-03T11:10:01Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 94e1846108226f786dc34820bd5c3db506be9c06 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 8 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `29` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 appears correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct. Confirm it's synced with any other version/release config if applicable.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: Consider changing 'svelte5 + vite6' to 'Svelte 5 + Vite 6' to ensure consistency and clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on purely informative or unimportant issues. This comment is about capitalization, which is not critical to the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that address code changes or logic issues. This comment does not address a functional issue.
The comment should be deleted because it addresses a stylistic issue rather than a code change or logic issue.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: Consider changing 'svelte 5' to 'Svelte 5' (capitalizing 'Svelte') to match common naming conventions.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a change in the diff, specifically a typographical suggestion. However, it is not a code change that affects functionality or logic. The comment is more about style and convention, which is not critical to the code's operation. According to the rules, comments should only be kept if they suggest a necessary code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of maintaining consistent naming conventions in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While naming conventions are important, the rules prioritize comments that suggest necessary code changes. This is more of a stylistic suggestion, which is not critical according to the rules.
The comment should be deleted as it suggests a stylistic change rather than a necessary code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_M9JCPd7bqBCoqKYW`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-03T11:50:45Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 3c80c58a3b669183d6f418dd972c546870ee6d3c in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 17 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `30` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `5` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0; change looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Confirm consistency with changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is asking the PR author to confirm consistency with the changelog, which is similar to asking them to double-check something. This violates the rule against asking for confirmations or double-checks.

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' in the feature description 'Implement sending diff to ai' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. Additionally, the changelog is not part of the code logic, so this comment might not be necessary.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic suggestions in documentation. This comment does not address a code logic issue.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a code change and is more about stylistic consistency in documentation.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In 'migrate to svelte5 + vite6', consider formatting the tool names to 'Svelte 5' and 'Vite 6' for better readability.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a formatting suggestion for tool names in a changelog entry. This is a purely informative comment and does not indicate a necessary code change. The formatting of tool names in a changelog is not critical and does not affect functionality.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistent formatting in documentation. However, the rules specify not to make purely informative comments unless a code change is required.
Even if consistent formatting is generally good practice, it does not warrant a comment unless it affects functionality or causes confusion.
Delete the comment as it is purely informative and does not indicate a necessary code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:14</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the bug fix description 'Remaining svelte 5 bugs', consider capitalizing 'svelte' to 'Svelte' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is purely informative and suggests a change in the PR description, which is against the rules. It does not provide a code suggestion or address a potential issue in the code itself.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_W9dgRq5ObbJfsUL9`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-03T12:18:42Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8919aaea94f039b2ae8a3fb061cbeabc53ce9941 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 12 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `31` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure this is in sync with the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0. Ensure this bump is in sync with other release artifacts.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There's an inconsistency in how 'svelte 5' is formatted. In the Features section, it’s written as 'svelte5', while in the Bug Fixes section it's 'svelte 5'. For consistency and clarity, please choose one style and update accordingly.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a formatting inconsistency in the changelog, which is a minor issue. The changelog is not part of the code logic, and such inconsistencies do not affect the functionality of the code. The comment does not suggest a code change that impacts the software's behavior or quality.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can affect readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the changelog is not part of the code logic, and the inconsistency does not impact the software's functionality. The comment does not suggest a necessary code change.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a minor formatting issue in the changelog, which does not require a code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_AqPSKyOAibM9UxT8`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-03T14:35:10Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on acb0a6851c749dbc8d6e009bcf1960501259a34c in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 33 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `32` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `7` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0 as per changelog. Ensure consistency with semantics.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' in the feature description '* Implement sending diff to ai (...)' for clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change that affects functionality or logic. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. The capitalization of 'AI' is a minor stylistic preference and does not impact the code's functionality.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistent terminology in documentation, which can be important for clarity and professionalism.
While consistency in documentation is important, the rules prioritize comments that address functional or logical issues over stylistic ones.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a minor stylistic issue rather than a functional or logical code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider using consistent and clear formatting by capitalizing and adding a space: change 'migrate to svelte5 + vite6' to 'Migrate to Svelte 5 and Vite 6'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. Additionally, the changelog is not part of the code logic, so it might not be relevant to comment on its formatting.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistent formatting in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistent formatting is important, the rules emphasize focusing on code changes and logic, not stylistic or formatting issues in documentation.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a stylistic change in documentation, not a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' in the entry '* **frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result (...)'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code logic issue. The capitalization of 'json' to 'JSON' is a minor stylistic suggestion and does not indicate a code change requirement. According to the rules, comments should not be made on unimportant or obvious issues, and this seems to fall into that category.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which could be considered a quality issue. However, the rules emphasize actionable and clear code quality refactors, not stylistic changes in documentation.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic suggestions in documentation. Therefore, this comment does not meet the criteria for retention.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a minor stylistic change in documentation, not a code change requirement.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:17</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' in the entry '* prevent invalid returned ai completion object errors (...)'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change that affects functionality or logic. The rules specify not to comment on unimportant or obvious issues, and this seems to fall into that category. The capitalization of 'AI' is not a critical issue that requires a code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistent capitalization in documentation, which could be considered a quality issue.
While consistency in documentation is important, the rules prioritize comments on functional or logical issues over stylistic ones.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a stylistic change, which is not critical according to the rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>CHANGELOG.md:18</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing and standardizing 'svelte 5' to 'Svelte 5' in the entry '* Remaining svelte 5 bugs (...)' for consistency with other entries.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code logic issue. The rules specify not to comment on unimportant or obvious issues, and this seems to fall into that category. The capitalization of 'svelte 5' does not affect the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments on logic and functionality over stylistic issues. This comment does not address a functional change.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a stylistic issue rather than a functional or logical change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_OcXYOln625Frl69P`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-03T19:28:49Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on a7179f24d9617f3806d5b076e040fb8823fa88d7 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 32 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `33` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `7` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version number updated to 1.482.0; change looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct. Ensure that a trailing newline is maintained per project conventions.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' for consistency and clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on purely informative or unimportant issues. Capitalization for consistency is a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change.
The capitalization might improve readability and consistency, which could be considered a minor improvement. However, it does not impact the functionality or logic of the code.
While consistency is generally good, the rules prioritize comments that require code changes, not stylistic suggestions.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a stylistic change, not a necessary code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Please capitalize 'azure' to 'Azure' as it is a proper noun.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a logic or code quality issue. The rules specify not to comment on purely stylistic changes unless they are part of a code quality refactor. This change does not affect the functionality or quality of the code.
I might be overlooking the importance of proper nouns in documentation, but the rules emphasize logic and code quality over stylistic changes.
Even though proper nouns are important, the rules prioritize logic and code quality issues over stylistic changes in comments.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a stylistic change, not a logic or code quality issue.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There is an inconsistency in the naming of 'svelte5'. Consider using a consistent format (e.g., 'Svelte 5') to match its usage elsewhere in the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a naming inconsistency, which is not a code logic issue. The changelog is meant to document changes, and while consistency is nice, it is not critical to the functionality or logic of the code. The comment does not suggest a code change that affects the software's behavior.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can affect readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the primary focus should be on code logic and functionality. The comment does not address a functional issue, so it is not critical.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a code logic issue or a change that affects the software's behavior.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:15</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' as it is an acronym and should be consistently formatted.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change rather than a functional or logical issue. The changelog is meant to document changes, and while consistency in formatting is good, it doesn't impact the functionality or logic of the code. The comment does not suggest a code change that affects the software's behavior.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism. However, the rules emphasize actionable and clear code quality refactors, not stylistic changes in documentation.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that address functional or logical issues over stylistic ones. This comment does not meet the criteria for a necessary code change.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a stylistic issue rather than a functional or logical code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Please capitalize 'ai' to 'AI' for consistency and clarity in the description of the bug fix.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a change in the diff, specifically the changelog entry. However, the capitalization of 'ai' to 'AI' is a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change. It is not a significant issue that affects the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be crucial for understanding and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the comment does not address a functional or logical issue in the code, and the changelog is not part of the code logic itself.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a minor stylistic issue that does not require a code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_AwS1CuG1pS4f9niP`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-03T19:30:04Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 80415d024093a47fd97dbd81a2f037e956c8397f in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 32 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `33` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `6` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump from 1.481.0 to 1.482.0 is correctly applied.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure this version aligns with the changelog and semantic versioning.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' in the phrase '* Implement sending diff to ai' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. Additionally, it does not suggest a code quality refactor, which is encouraged by the rules.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be considered part of code quality. However, the rules emphasize actionable and clear refactors, not stylistic changes.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic suggestions. This comment does not suggest a change that impacts functionality or code quality in a significant way.
The comment should be deleted as it does not suggest a necessary code change and focuses on a minor stylistic issue.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider changing '* make azure a standalone AI provider' to '* Make Azure a standalone AI provider' to ensure proper capitalization for both the beginning of the sentence and the proper noun 'Azure'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. It does not address a functional or logical issue in the code. The changelog is not part of the code logic, and the capitalization does not affect the functionality.
I might be overlooking the importance of maintaining a consistent style in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While style consistency is important, the rules specify that comments should only be made if there is a code change required. This is a stylistic suggestion, not a code change.
The comment should be deleted because it addresses a stylistic issue rather than a code change, and the rules specify not to comment on such issues.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:14</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' in '* **frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result' for proper terminology.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a minor stylistic change in the changelog, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on unimportant or obvious issues. Capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' is a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of proper terminology in documentation. However, the rules emphasize focusing on code changes rather than stylistic issues in documentation.
While proper terminology is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic documentation changes.
The comment should be deleted as it focuses on a minor stylistic issue in the changelog, which does not require a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:15</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' in '* prevent invalid returned ai completion object errors' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on purely informative or unimportant issues. Capitalization for consistency is a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that require code changes. This is a minor stylistic issue and does not impact functionality or logic.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_oLPuSaiNME28XyTw`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-03T19:41:58Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on bacba435fc4d1a076872b6842caf94b3b96f1fd6 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 32 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `34` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `8` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version number update is correct and aligns with the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:2</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Extra blank line may be removed if not required.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure this change is aligned with the release process.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' in '* Implement sending diff to ai ...' for consistency and clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change that affects functionality or logic. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. The capitalization of 'ai' does not impact the functionality of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism. However, the rules emphasize actionable and clear code quality refactors, not stylistic changes.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize functional and logical changes over stylistic ones. The comment does not address a functional issue, so it should be removed.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a stylistic issue rather than a functional or logical code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing the first word and proper nouns in '* make azure a standalone AI provider ...'. For example, change to 'Make Azure a standalone AI provider'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is purely stylistic and does not address any functional or technical aspect of the code. It suggests a change in capitalization, which is not critical to the functionality or understanding of the code. Therefore, it does not align with the rules for useful comments.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider using consistent capitalization for technology names in '* migrate to svelte5 + vite6 ...'. For clarity, you might update it to 'Migrate to Svelte 5 + Vite 6' (adjusting as per project style).
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. The capitalization of technology names in a changelog is not critical to the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistent capitalization for documentation purposes, which could be considered a part of code quality.
While documentation consistency is important, the rules emphasize actionable code changes and logic over stylistic documentation changes.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a stylistic change in documentation, not a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' in '* prevent invalid returned ai completion object errors ...' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on purely informative or unimportant issues. Capitalization for consistency is a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that require code changes. This is a minor stylistic issue and does not warrant a comment according to the rules.
Delete the comment as it is about a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>CHANGELOG.md:17</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'svelte' to 'Svelte' in '* Remaining svelte 5 bugs ...' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The capitalization of 'svelte' does not affect the functionality or logic of the code. The comment does not point out a necessary change, as it is purely about consistency in capitalization.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the comment does not point out a functional issue or a necessary code change. It is more of a suggestion for improvement rather than a required change.
The comment should be deleted as it does not point out a necessary code change and is more about stylistic consistency.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_S7HeeBIpYhPSGDEs`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-03T20:22:12Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on c5a34db02f829d203956bab7d0ac6040b196cfcf in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 31 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `34` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `8` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Confirm that the version bump to 1.482.0 in version.txt is consistently applied throughout the project (e.g., in package metadata files if applicable).
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `33%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bumped to 1.482.0. Ensure it remains in sync with the changelog and any other version references.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical: Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' for consistency with similar entries.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on purely informative or unimportant issues. Consistency in capitalization is a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change.
The consistency in capitalization might be important for readability and professionalism, which could justify the comment's presence.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic suggestions. This comment does not indicate a code change is required.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change and is purely stylistic.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical: Consider capitalizing the bullet to 'Make Azure a standalone AI provider' to maintain consistency and proper noun formatting.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a typographical change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to comment on purely informative or unimportant issues, and this seems to fall into that category. The changelog is not part of the code logic, and the comment does not suggest a code quality refactor.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, but the rules emphasize code changes, not documentation formatting.
The rules are clear about focusing on code changes, and typographical suggestions in documentation do not align with the primary focus of code logic and quality refactors.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change and is about a typographical issue in documentation.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical: Consider updating '* migrate to svelte5 + vite6' to '* Migrate to Svelte 5 + Vite 6' to improve readability and proper naming conventions.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a typographical change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to comment on purely informative or unimportant issues. This seems to be a minor readability improvement, not a necessary code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of maintaining consistent naming conventions in documentation, which could be considered part of code quality.
While naming conventions are important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over minor typographical suggestions. This does not seem to warrant a comment based on the rules provided.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a necessary code change and is more of a minor typographical suggestion.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:15</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical: Consider capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' in '* **frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a typographical suggestion, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. Additionally, the capitalization of 'json' in a changelog does not affect the functionality of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which could be considered a part of code quality.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over typographical suggestions in documentation.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a necessary code change and is more about typographical consistency.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical: Replace 'ai' with 'AI' in '* prevent invalid returned ai completion object errors' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a typographical change, which is not a critical issue. The changelog is meant to document changes, and while consistency is good, this is not a significant problem that requires a code change. The comment does not point out a functional or logical error.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the changelog is not part of the functional code, and this typographical issue does not affect the software's operation.
The comment should be deleted as it does not point out a critical issue that requires a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>CHANGELOG.md:17</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical: Consider updating '* Remaining svelte 5 bugs' to '* Remaining Svelte 5 bugs' to correct the capitalization.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment looked like it was already resolved.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_ksXypLWKy1FMVQc8`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-03T21:20:27Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 9e6ac95686684788527f8857ad2069222f378c5a in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 23 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `35` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `7` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0. Ensure the trailing newline (empty line) is intentional.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'AI' consistently (e.g., change 'ai' to 'AI') if it's intended as the acronym for Artificial Intelligence.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change rather than a functional or logical issue. The changelog is not part of the code logic, and the capitalization of 'AI' does not affect functionality. The comment does not point out a code change requirement, so it might not be necessary to keep it.
The capitalization might be important for consistency and professionalism in documentation, which could be considered a quality issue.
While consistency is important, the comment does not address a functional issue or a code change requirement, which is the primary focus of the review.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a code change requirement and is more about stylistic consistency.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'Azure' (i.e., change 'azure' to 'Azure') to reflect the proper noun for the Microsoft service.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The capitalization of 'Azure' is a minor issue and does not affect the functionality or logic of the code. According to the rules, comments should only be made if there is a clear code change required, and this is not the case here.
The capitalization of proper nouns can be important for clarity and professionalism, especially in documentation. However, the rules specify that comments should not be made for unimportant issues.
While capitalization is important, it does not constitute a code change, and the rules prioritize comments that address code changes over stylistic issues.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a stylistic issue rather than a necessary code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:11</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider formatting framework names and version numbers consistently. For instance, 'svelte5' could be written as 'Svelte 5' and 'vite6' as 'Vite 6', if they refer to the respective versions.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about formatting, which is not a code change. It doesn't suggest a code quality refactor or a necessary change. The changelog is meant to document changes, and the current format does not hinder understanding. The comment is more of a suggestion for consistency rather than a required change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can improve readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the comment does not point out a critical issue that needs addressing. The current format is understandable, and the comment does not suggest a necessary change.
The comment should be deleted as it does not point out a necessary change in the code or documentation.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'JSON' (i.e., change 'json' to 'JSON') to properly reflect the standard JSON format.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a functional or logical issue. The changelog is meant to document changes, and while stylistic consistency is nice, it doesn't impact the functionality or logic of the code. Therefore, the comment does not indicate a necessary code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of stylistic consistency in documentation. However, the rules emphasize focusing on functional or logical issues rather than stylistic ones.
While stylistic consistency is important, it does not warrant a comment unless it impacts functionality or logic, which is not the case here.
The comment should be deleted as it does not indicate a necessary code change and focuses on a stylistic issue.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>CHANGELOG.md:18</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'Svelte' (i.e., change 'svelte 5' to 'Svelte 5') to ensure consistent and proper naming of the framework.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change that affects functionality or logic. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. Additionally, the changelog is not part of the code logic itself.
I might be overlooking the importance of maintaining consistent naming conventions in documentation, which could be considered important for clarity and professionalism.
While consistency in naming is important, the rules prioritize comments on code logic and functionality over stylistic or documentation issues.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a stylistic change in documentation, which is not a priority according to the rules.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_jpBWk1rqZ218qGlH`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T09:16:47Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 166a06038823b66edea1d4ec5bf9df9ea07d9c13 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 48 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `36` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `9` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump update looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct. Ensure it is in sync with CHANGELOG.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the bullet '* handle sending selected lines to ai context', consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' for consistency with common usage.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. Additionally, the changelog is not part of the code logic, so it might not be relevant to comment on it.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic suggestions in documentation.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change and is more about stylistic consistency, which is not prioritized by the rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the bullet '* Implement sending diff to ai', consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a typographical suggestion, which is not a code change. It does not address a functional issue or a code quality refactor. The capitalization of 'AI' is a minor stylistic choice and does not impact the functionality or quality of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistent capitalization in documentation, which can affect readability and professionalism.
While consistency in documentation is important, the rules prioritize comments that address code changes or quality refactors. This comment does not meet those criteria.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a code change or quality refactor and is not impactful enough to warrant a change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the bullet '* make azure a standalone AI provider', 'azure' should be capitalized to 'Azure' to reflect the proper noun.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a typographical issue, which is not critical to the functionality or logic of the code. According to the rules, comments should not be made on unimportant issues. Capitalization of 'azure' is a minor issue and does not affect the code's functionality.
I might be underestimating the importance of proper capitalization in documentation, which can affect professionalism and clarity.
While proper capitalization is important for professionalism, it is not critical to the functionality or logic of the code, and thus does not warrant a comment according to the rules.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a minor typographical issue that does not affect the functionality or logic of the code.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:11</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the bullet '* migrate to svelte5 + vite6', consider formatting as 'migrate to Svelte 5 + Vite 6' for clarity and proper spacing.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a minor formatting issue in the changelog. While it suggests a clearer format, it does not point out a code change requirement. The changelog is typically for documentation purposes, and the suggested change does not impact functionality or logic.
I might be underestimating the importance of clear documentation. However, the rules specify not to comment on unimportant issues, and this seems to fall into that category.
Even though clear documentation is important, the change suggested is not critical and does not affect the code's functionality.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a necessary code change and is not critical.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>CHANGELOG.md:17</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the bullet '* flow editor svelte 5 issues', consider capitalizing 'svelte' to 'Svelte' (i.e., 'flow editor Svelte 5 issues').
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not crucial to the functionality or logic of the code. The capitalization of 'svelte' does not impact the code's behavior or logic, and such a change is not necessary for the changelog to be understood.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for professional presentation.
While consistency is important, the comment does not address a functional issue or a significant error. It is more of a stylistic preference.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a necessary change in the code or documentation.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>CHANGELOG.md:18</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the bullet '* **frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result', 'json' should be capitalized to 'JSON'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic issue in a documentation file, which does not require a code change. The rules specify not to comment on purely informative or unimportant issues, and this seems to fall into that category.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that require code changes, and this is not one of them.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change and is about a minor stylistic issue in documentation.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>CHANGELOG.md:19</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the bullet '* prevent invalid returned ai completion object errors', consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a functional or logical issue. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. The capitalization of 'AI' is not critical to the understanding or functionality of the changelog entry.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistent capitalization in documentation, which can affect readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that address functional or logical issues over stylistic ones. This comment does not address a critical issue.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a minor stylistic issue that does not require a code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_CLAmlnhQA0EZauVv`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T09:33:57Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 1d27bc25062922413b01c51ddcbee80474a980c1 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 31 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `37` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `5` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0. Consider ensuring the file ends with a newline per best practices.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `33%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump update: Confirmed version updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' in the bullet '* handle sending selected lines to ai context' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on purely informative or unimportant issues. Capitalization for consistency is a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic suggestions. This comment does not indicate a necessary code change.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a necessary code change and is more of a stylistic suggestion.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:18</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' in the bullet '* **frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result' for consistency with common standards.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change that is not related to any code logic or functionality. It is also not about a change introduced in this diff, as the changelog entry was not modified in this diff. The comment does not suggest a code change that is required.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, but the rules specify not to comment on unimportant or obvious issues.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable and necessary comments related to code changes.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a change made in this diff and is not about a necessary code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There's an inconsistency in formatting for Svelte version formatting: consider using a consistent style (e.g., 'Svelte 5' instead of 'svelte5') as seen in '* migrate to svelte5 + vite6' compared to '* flow editor svelte 5 issues'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a formatting inconsistency, which is a minor issue and does not require a code change. The changelog is not part of the code logic, and such inconsistencies are not critical. The comment does not suggest a code quality refactor or a necessary change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can affect readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the changelog is not part of the code logic, and such minor inconsistencies do not warrant a comment in a code review context.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a minor formatting issue in the changelog, which does not require a code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_T79q7n1CylARNgmT`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T16:07:18Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 82be72578a64cfadb3ee9c17e5b716cb9e70f3c1 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 5 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `38` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version correctly updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 correctly matches the release title.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:11</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider adding spaces between the technology names and version numbers for clarity, e.g., change 'svelte5 + vite6' to 'svelte 5 + vite 6'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a change in the diff, specifically the changelog entry. However, the suggestion is purely about formatting and does not indicate a necessary code change. It is more of a stylistic preference and does not impact functionality or logic.
I might be underestimating the importance of clarity in documentation, which can be crucial for understanding. However, the rules emphasize actionable and necessary changes, not stylistic preferences.
While clarity is important, the rules prioritize necessary code changes over stylistic suggestions. This comment does not indicate a required change.
The comment should be deleted as it suggests a stylistic change rather than a necessary code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:9</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
For consistency in the changelog bullet points, consider making the first word lowercase (e.g., change 'Implement' to 'implement') to match the style of the other items.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change in the changelog, which is not a code logic issue. The rules specify not to comment on purely informative or unimportant issues, and this seems to fall into that category. The changelog is documentation, not code logic, so this comment does not suggest a necessary code change.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, but the rules emphasize code logic over documentation style.
The rules are clear about focusing on code logic changes, and this comment does not address a code logic issue.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code logic change and is about documentation style.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_zozWWJFe0D5f1a1h`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T17:14:02Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 7ab2e53a14ae6d290e2a0a73fb3e8751f05c4987 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 37 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `39` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `9` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Confirm it aligns with the CHANGELOG and release notes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure consistency with changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'azure' to 'Azure' for consistency with proper noun usage.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The changelog is not part of the code logic, and the capitalization of 'azure' does not affect the functionality. The comment does not indicate a necessary code change, so it should be deleted.
The capitalization of proper nouns can be important for clarity and professionalism, even in documentation like a changelog. However, it is not a code logic issue.
While capitalization is important, it does not constitute a code change, and the rules specify not to comment on purely informative or stylistic issues.
Delete the comment as it does not pertain to a necessary code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:11</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider updating 'svelte5 + vite6' to 'Svelte 5 + Vite 6' to improve readability and maintain consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change in the changelog, which is not a code change. It does not indicate a necessary change in functionality or logic. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for a required code change.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be crucial for understanding and maintaining the codebase.
While consistency is important, the rules specify that comments should only be kept if they indicate a necessary code change. This comment does not meet that criterion.
The comment should be deleted as it does not indicate a necessary code change and is purely stylistic.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:14</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'svelte' to 'Svelte' in '* app editor svelte 5 fixes' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on purely informative or unimportant issues. Capitalization in a changelog entry is not a critical issue that requires a code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, but the rules emphasize actionable code changes, not stylistic ones.
Even if consistency is important, the rules prioritize code changes over stylistic suggestions in documentation.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a stylistic change, not a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider updating 'svelte' to 'Svelte' in '* flow editor svelte 5 issues' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change in the changelog, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to comment on purely informative or unimportant issues, and this seems to fall into that category. The changelog entry is understandable as is, and the change suggested is not critical.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, but the rules emphasize code changes, not documentation style.
Even if consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic documentation changes.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change and is more about stylistic consistency in documentation.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>CHANGELOG.md:17</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' in '* **frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result' for clarity and consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The changelog is meant to document changes, and while consistency is good, this is not a critical issue. The comment does not point out a code change requirement, so it should be deleted.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the comment does not point out a functional issue or a necessary code change, so it does not meet the criteria for keeping.
Delete the comment as it does not point out a necessary code change and is more about stylistic consistency.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>CHANGELOG.md:20</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider updating 'svelte' to 'Svelte' in '* Remaining svelte 5 bugs' for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on purely informative or unimportant issues. Consistency in capitalization is a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic suggestions in documentation.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a minor stylistic issue and not a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There is inconsistent capitalization for 'ai'. Consider standardizing it to 'AI' across the changelog for clarity (e.g., in '* handle sending selected lines to ai context' and similar entries).
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on purely informative or unimportant issues. Capitalization consistency in a changelog does not affect the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be overlooking the importance of documentation consistency, but the rules emphasize code changes, not documentation style.
While documentation consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic suggestions in documentation.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a stylistic issue in documentation, not a code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_43OmOqKaab1Q4G9V`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T17:59:04Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 2ff6db022e78d58a65b92d95ab0f5b25cb3c7ab6 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 7 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `39` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct. Ensure it aligns with the release notes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:7</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There are several instances where proper names appear in inconsistent casing. For example, terms like 'ai' (should be 'AI'), 'svelte' (should be 'Svelte'), 'vite6' (should be 'Vite 6'), 'json' (should be 'JSON'), and 'azure' (should be 'Azure') might be standardized for clarity and consistency throughout the changelog. Consider revising these for a more polished look.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a stylistic issue rather than a functional or logical error in the code. The changelog is meant to document changes, and while consistency is nice, it is not critical to the functionality of the code. The comment does not point out a change that needs to be made for the code to work correctly.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can affect readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, it is not critical to the functionality of the code, and the changelog is not part of the code logic itself.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a functional issue or a necessary code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_B7pfYj5e06Ln5Oge`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T18:20:27Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on b26d1f9f1f4729d4d0919d73190f7661323320c5 in <ellipsistime>19 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `40` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Confirming version.txt is updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0 as expected.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_sE6YEAaxYPxCIvSB`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T18:36:05Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on a5041f41d4ac2accc07df5661aa5b20b1caec972 in <ellipsistime>23 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `40` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 is correctly updated.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>CHANGELOG.md:2</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Changelog entry for 1.482.0 looks consistent with the version update.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct and matches the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_uKVRL0qofWA45R58`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-04T19:52:18Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Incremental review on b87fa559b6be0f0b02b229745d6f685dc77007b0 in <ellipsistime>56 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `41` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bumped to 1.482.0. Confirm that this update is consistent with all other version references.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0; this is expected and matches the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:18</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The '**cli:**' label is currently in lowercase. For consistency and clarity, consider capitalizing it as '**CLI:**'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic choice rather than a functional issue. The changelog format does not seem to require capitalization, and other labels are also in lowercase. This makes the comment more of a suggestion than a necessary change.
I might be overlooking a style guide that mandates capitalization for labels in the changelog. If such a guide exists, the comment would be valid.
Without evidence of a style guide requiring capitalization, the comment remains a suggestion rather than a necessary change.
The comment should be deleted as it suggests a stylistic change that is not required by the changelog format.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:21</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the changelog bullet for '**frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result', consider capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' to reflect the conventional acronym styling.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change in the changelog, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to comment on purely informative or unimportant issues, and this seems to fall into that category. The capitalization of 'JSON' in a changelog does not affect the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that require code changes or affect logic. This comment does not meet those criteria.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change or logic issue.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_oIsQwoTH6ibNcKiE`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-05T10:52:56Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on a63e7ed870084a7129ddf89287c1726a67f16a8c in <ellipsistime>59 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `42` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Confirm that this aligns with the CHANGELOG and release guidelines.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version number updated correctly to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:13</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider updating the commit message '* migrate to svelte5 + vite6' to use consistent and properly capitalized terminology (e.g., 'Svelte 5' and 'Vite 6'). This improves readability and consistency across the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `30%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment suggests improving the commit message for readability and consistency. While it doesn't ask the author to update the PR description, it does focus on a commit message, which is not directly related to the code changes themselves. The comment is more about style and consistency rather than functionality or correctness of the code.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There is inconsistent capitalization for 'ai' in commit messages (e.g. 'handle sending selected lines to ai context', 'Implement sending diff to ai', versus 'make azure a standalone AI provider'). Consider standardizing this (preferably as 'AI') for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a consistency issue in the changelog, which is part of the changes made in the diff. Consistency in documentation is important for readability and professionalism. However, the comment does not suggest a code change, but rather a documentation change, which might not be critical.
The comment is about a documentation change, not a code change, and might not be critical enough to warrant a comment. The rules suggest focusing on code changes rather than documentation.
While the comment is about documentation, consistency in documentation can be important for maintaining a professional and readable codebase.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a code change and focuses on documentation consistency, which is not critical.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_JPe00VngfpvgPk69`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-05T12:19:57Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 580d2444a67747cd6c77adf5d3dc32eb8bf53253 in <ellipsistime>23 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `43` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0. Confirm all dependent version references are updated accordingly.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:2</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Unused blank line found.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version update is correct and consistent with the release notes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_DjwqvJBlcPcgsBoG`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-05T13:37:16Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Incremental review on 00c9841a5d3561fa38b7f9df6921a10684c41c6b in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 38 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `44` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `11` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Confirm that this aligns with the release notes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the entry '* handle sending selected lines to ai context', 'ai' should be capitalized as 'AI'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a stylistic issue, which is not a functional or logical change. The changelog is meant to document changes, and while clarity is important, the capitalization of 'AI' does not affect the functionality or logic of the code. The comment does not suggest a code change that impacts the software's behavior.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can affect readability and professionalism. However, the rules emphasize code changes over stylistic ones.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that address functional or logical issues over stylistic ones. The capitalization of 'AI' does not impact the software's functionality.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a stylistic issue rather than a functional or logical change, which does not align with the review rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In the entry '* make azure a standalone AI provider', 'azure' should be capitalized as 'Azure'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a typo in the changelog, which is part of the documentation. While it is a valid observation, it is not a critical issue that requires a code change. The changelog is meant to be informative, and the capitalization of 'azure' does not impact the functionality of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of proper capitalization in documentation, as it can reflect on the professionalism and attention to detail of the project.
While capitalization is important for professionalism, the changelog is not part of the code logic, and the comment does not suggest a change that impacts the code's functionality.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a critical issue that requires a code change, and it pertains to documentation rather than code logic.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:13</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In '* migrate to svelte5 + vite6', consider changing to 'Migrate to Svelte 5 + Vite 6' to improve readability.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a minor readability issue in the changelog, which is not a critical code change. The changelog is meant to document changes, and the suggested change does not affect the functionality or understanding of the changes listed.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistent formatting in documentation, which can aid in readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the comment does not address a functional issue or a significant readability problem that would hinder understanding.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a minor formatting issue that does not require a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:17</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In '* app editor svelte 5 fixes', 'svelte 5' should be 'Svelte 5'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a stylistic issue in a changelog file, which is not a functional or logical change. According to the rules, comments should only be made if there is a clear code change required, and stylistic changes in documentation do not meet this criterion.
I might be overlooking the importance of maintaining consistent capitalization in documentation, which could be considered a quality issue.
While consistency in documentation is important, the rules prioritize functional and logical changes over stylistic ones, especially in non-code files like changelogs.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a stylistic issue in a documentation file, which does not require a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>CHANGELOG.md:20</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In '* flow editor svelte 5 issues', 'svelte 5' should be 'Svelte 5'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a minor typographical issue in the changelog, which is not a critical part of the codebase. The changelog is meant for human readers and a small typo like this does not affect the functionality or understanding significantly. According to the rules, comments should only be kept if they address a clear code change requirement, and this does not seem to be the case here.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency and professionalism in documentation, which could be a reason to keep the comment.
While consistency in documentation is important, the rules prioritize comments that address code changes or significant issues. A minor typo in a changelog does not meet this threshold.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a minor typographical issue in the changelog, which does not require a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>CHANGELOG.md:21</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In '* **frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result', 'json' should be 'JSON'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a typographical issue in the changelog, which is part of the changes in the diff. However, the changelog is not part of the code logic, and the typo does not affect functionality. The comment is more about style than a necessary code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for professional presentation.
While consistency is important, the changelog is not part of the code logic, and the typo does not impact functionality or require a code change.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a necessary code change and is more about stylistic consistency.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>CHANGELOG.md:24</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In '* prevent invalid returned ai completion object errors', 'ai' should be 'AI'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a minor typographical issue in the changelog, which is not a critical code change. The changelog is meant for human readers, and while consistency in capitalization is good, it doesn't affect the functionality of the code. The comment does not suggest a code change that impacts the software's behavior.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can reflect on the professionalism of the project.
While consistency is important, the primary focus should be on changes that affect the code's functionality. This comment does not address such a change.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a critical code change and focuses on a minor typographical issue.

</details>

<details>
<summary>10. <code>CHANGELOG.md:25</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In '* Remaining svelte 5 bugs', 'svelte 5' should be 'Svelte 5'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a minor typographical issue in the changelog. While it is technically correct, it does not indicate a code change requirement. The changelog is not part of the code logic, and the capitalization of 'Svelte' is not critical to the functionality or understanding of the changelog.
I might be underestimating the importance of maintaining consistent capitalization for proper nouns in documentation, which can reflect on the professionalism of the project.
While consistency in documentation is important, the primary focus should be on code changes that affect functionality. This typo does not impact the code or its execution.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change requirement and is not critical to the functionality of the project.

</details>

<details>
<summary>11. <code>CHANGELOG.md:26</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo: In '* tenant id to never be undefined on teams', 'tenant id' should be 'tenant ID'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a minor typographical issue in the changelog, which is not a part of the code logic. The changelog is meant for documentation purposes, and such a minor typo does not affect the functionality or understanding of the code changes. According to the rules, comments should focus on code changes that require action, and this does not seem to be one of them.
I might be underestimating the importance of maintaining consistent documentation standards, which could be important for some teams.
While documentation consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that address code changes requiring action. A minor typo in a changelog does not meet this threshold.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a minor typo in the changelog, which does not require a code change or action.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_LiV8K64Pq3w9HSuY`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-05T14:14:02Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 99e07dacc452b3da8ac71fdd350eadc6f3b578af in <ellipsistime>49 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `45` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Ensure version bump to 1.482.0 is intentional and aligns with release notes in CHANGELOG.md.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0 looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:20</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
It looks like there's an extra pair of slashes in the description 'tag //native'. If this isn’t intentional, please consider removing one of the slashes for clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a potential typo or formatting issue in the changelog, which is part of the diff. However, the changelog is often a reflection of commit messages or issue titles, which might intentionally include such formatting. Without strong evidence that this is a mistake, the comment might not be necessary.
I might be overthinking the intentionality of the slashes. It could simply be a typo that needs correction.
Even if it's a typo, the changelog is not critical code logic, and such a minor issue might not warrant a comment unless it causes confusion.
The comment is about a minor formatting issue in the changelog, which might not be significant enough to warrant a change. It should likely be deleted unless there's strong evidence it's a mistake.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_e72q6VjeD322IAuM`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-05T20:46:25Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 54d933a6fb93b51f58fc0c6e68a4503595de37cf in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 30 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `45` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `7` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version number updated correctly from 1.481.0 to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:13</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider adding spaces and adjusting capitalization for 'svelte5' and 'vite6' for consistency. For example, use 'Svelte 5' and 'Vite 6' instead of 'svelte5' and 'vite6'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change in the changelog, which is not a critical issue. The changelog is meant to convey information about changes, and the current format does not hinder understanding. The comment does not point out a code logic issue or a bug, so it may not be necessary to keep it.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can affect readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the primary goal of a changelog is to communicate changes clearly. The current format is understandable, and the comment does not address a critical issue.
The comment is about a stylistic change in the changelog, which is not critical. It does not address a code logic issue or bug, so it should be deleted.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'Azure' as it is a proper noun. Changing 'make azure a standalone AI provider' to 'make Azure a standalone AI provider' would improve consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a critical issue. The capitalization of 'Azure' is a minor consistency improvement and does not affect the functionality or logic of the code. According to the rules, comments should only be made if there is a clear code change required, and this is more of a suggestion for consistency rather than a necessary change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for professional presentation. However, the rules emphasize actionable and necessary changes, not stylistic ones.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize necessary code changes over stylistic suggestions. Therefore, the comment does not meet the criteria for keeping.
The comment should be deleted as it suggests a stylistic change that is not necessary according to the review rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:19</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
It appears that 'tag //native' might contain a typographical error with the double slash. Please verify if this is intended or if it should be corrected (e.g., 'tag native' or another intended format).
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is speculative, asking for verification rather than pointing out a definite issue. The changelog entry suggests that the double slash might be intentional, as it is part of a bug fix description. The comment does not provide strong evidence of an error, and it violates the rule against speculative comments.
I might be missing the context of how `tag //native` is used in the codebase, which could affect whether the double slash is an error or intentional.
The changelog entry indicates that `tag //native` is part of a bug fix, suggesting it is intentional. Without strong evidence of an error, the comment should be deleted.
The comment is speculative and lacks strong evidence of an error. It should be deleted as it does not meet the criteria for a useful comment.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:33</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'ID' in 'tenant id' to 'tenant ID' since it's an abbreviation. This helps maintain consistency and clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a functional or logical issue. The rules specify not to comment on unimportant or obvious issues, and this seems to fall into that category. The capitalization of 'ID' does not affect the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be crucial for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize functional and logical issues over stylistic ones. This comment does not address a functional issue, so it should be removed.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a stylistic issue rather than a functional or logical one.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>CHANGELOG.md:10</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
For consistency, consider using a uniform capitalization for 'AI' across all changelog entries. For instance, if you prefer 'AI', update 'ai context' to 'AI context'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic choice in the changelog, which is not a functional or logical issue. The changelog is a documentation file, and the comment does not suggest a code change. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for a necessary comment.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules specify that comments should only be made if there is a clear code change required. This comment does not suggest a code change.
The comment should be deleted because it does not address a code change and is about a stylistic choice in documentation.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_yoBCVV0f1kz5sePm`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-06T20:41:52Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on af2b3a29e5cb5bd3f8cb1a7058ec8047d68de167 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 7 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `46` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0; ensure consistency with release notes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated correctly to 1.482.0 as required for the release.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider changing 'svelte5' to 'Svelte 5' for consistency and readability.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change in the changelog, which is not a code change. The changelog is meant to document changes, and the style of writing 'svelte5' is not critical to the functionality or understanding of the code. The comment does not suggest a code change, and it is more about readability, which is not a strong enough reason to keep it.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the changelog is not part of the code logic, and the style of writing 'svelte5' does not impact the functionality or understanding of the code changes.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change and is more about stylistic preference in documentation.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:20</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider changing 'json' to 'JSON' to follow common conventions and improve clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The changelog is meant to document changes, not to enforce style conventions. The comment does not indicate a necessary code change.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, but the rules specify not to comment on unimportant issues.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic suggestions in documentation.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a necessary code change and is more about style.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_xCCOHCcdmkGN9C9A`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-07T12:46:34Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 20afe4f1e393f9ddb0e1e83fc00c6ec06d7ae84e in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 12 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `46` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure the file ends with a newline.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version correctly updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There's an inconsistency in the spelling of 'svelte 5'. Some entries use 'svelte 5' (with a space) while the bullet point '* migrate to svelte5 + vite6' concatenates it as 'svelte5'. Consider standardizing the formatting for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a formatting inconsistency in a documentation file, which is not a critical issue that requires a code change. The changelog is meant to document changes, and while consistency is nice, it is not crucial to the functionality of the code. The comment does not suggest a code quality refactor or a necessary change to the logic of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can affect readability and professionalism. However, the rules emphasize actionable and necessary changes, not purely informative or stylistic ones.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that address necessary code changes or logic issues. This comment does not meet those criteria.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a necessary code change or logic issue, and is purely about documentation consistency.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_48r4cwT5uebsHf9w`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-07T13:01:06Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on a0d71c584fc4347111eb84a0361309f6b283afff in <ellipsistime>21 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `47` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Ensure version bump is intentional and follows semantic versioning.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 is correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_CO6WRUqbKVh7ivJt`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-07T20:46:47Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 750f0f1a7ace5b24cbffe5acc194bac4780c2c11 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 47 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `48` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `5` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure consistency with changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bumped to 1.482.0. Ensure all version references are updated accordingly if needed.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:14</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider standardizing the capitalization of 'svelte'. In the Features section, it's written as 'svelte5' without a space, but in other entries (e.g., in Bug Fixes) it's 'svelte 5'. It might be clearer to use a consistent format (e.g., 'Svelte 5') across the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic issue in the changelog, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to comment on purely informative or unimportant issues, and this seems to fall into that category. The capitalization inconsistency does not affect the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be crucial for readability and professionalism. However, the rules emphasize focusing on code changes rather than documentation style.
While consistency in documentation is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic documentation issues. Therefore, this comment does not align with the primary focus of the review process.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a stylistic issue in the changelog, which is not a code change and does not require action based on the provided rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:19</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There's an inconsistency in how 'svelte' is referenced. In the Bug Fixes section at line 19, it's written as 'svelte 5 fixes'. For clarity, consider using a consistent capitalization (e.g., 'Svelte 5') throughout the document.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a documentation change, not a code logic change. The inconsistency in capitalization does not affect the functionality or logic of the code. According to the rules, comments should only be kept if they suggest a code change that affects logic or functionality.
I might be overlooking the importance of documentation consistency, which can be important for clarity and professionalism. However, the rules prioritize code logic changes over documentation changes.
While documentation consistency is important, the rules clearly state that comments should focus on code logic changes. Therefore, the comment should be removed as it does not pertain to a code logic change.
Remove the comment as it pertains to documentation consistency, not a code logic change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:25</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the Bug Fixes section at line 25, 'json' is mentioned. Generally, it's clearer and more standard to refer to it as 'JSON'. Please consider updating it for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to make comments on purely informative or unimportant issues. Changing 'json' to 'JSON' is a minor stylistic preference and does not impact the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic preferences. This change does not affect the code's functionality.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a stylistic change rather than a necessary code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_x6yvQEWnxjPsBCrx`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-07T20:56:20Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 21d78e26b1839b6536ebf9d3de66832c84e4061a in <ellipsistime>45 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `48` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:19</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical note: In the bug fix entry '* Dynamic select does not work with tag //native', please verify if the double slash ('//native') is intentional or if it should be corrected (e.g., to a single slash or removed).
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is asking the author to verify if the use of double slashes is intentional. This falls under asking the author to confirm their intention, which is against the rules. Therefore, this comment should be removed.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_r7rVcc65LmnTcNkc`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-08T08:21:15Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 7a6994ec021aa601d680f324720ba7ad44441c22 in <ellipsistime>30 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `49` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct. Ensure it matches corresponding release notes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure all version references are consistent.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_UjDcsFcJaWUuoYi8`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-08T09:17:05Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on f8288dbc23d430cd8568a2f7b74eb49b5da39c5b in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 35 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `50` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `6` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 is correctly updated.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version number updated to 1.482.0. Confirm consistency with the changelog and related files.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:13</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'azure' to 'Azure' for consistency and correctness.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The changelog is not part of the code logic, and the capitalization of 'azure' does not affect the functionality. The comment does not suggest a code quality refactor, and it is not about a change in the code logic.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency in documentation is important, the rules specify not to comment on purely stylistic changes unless they affect code logic or quality. This comment does not meet those criteria.
The comment should be deleted because it pertains to a stylistic change in documentation, not a code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:14</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider updating 'svelte5 + vite6' to 'Svelte 5 + Vite 6' to ensure consistency with other mentions (e.g., 'svelte 5' in bug fixes) and proper branding.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change in the changelog, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to comment on purely informative or unimportant issues, and this seems to fall into that category. The changelog is not part of the code logic, and the suggestion does not impact functionality.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for professional presentation. However, the rules emphasize code changes, not documentation style.
While consistency in documentation is important, the rules are clear about focusing on code changes. This comment does not address a code change, so it should be removed.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change and is more about stylistic consistency in documentation.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:29</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'mssql' to 'MSSQL' for consistency and clarity in this bullet point.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The changelog is meant to document changes, not enforce style consistency. The capitalization of 'mssql' does not affect the functionality or understanding of the changelog entry.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can aid in clarity and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the changelog's primary purpose is to document changes, not to enforce style. The comment does not point out a functional issue.
The comment should be deleted as it does not address a code change or functional issue.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:32</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider updating 'tenant id' to 'tenant ID' for proper abbreviation formatting.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The changelog is meant to document changes, not to ensure perfect grammar or style. The comment does not point out a functional issue or a necessary code change.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistent styling in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistent styling is important, it does not constitute a necessary code change. The changelog's primary purpose is to document changes, not to serve as a style guide.
The comment should be deleted as it does not point out a necessary code change and is more about stylistic preference.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_EJMvzSBcs86ZF8kS`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-08T15:16:12Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 612da291cd70055399f40f7f5ebe64092bae1e35 in <ellipsistime>29 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `51` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Verify version bump consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure consistency with the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_SDThzKaO0k7a5CBf`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-08T22:44:09Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on ffc12b70cd897b47327f9bc09b81bbc6854a8477 in <ellipsistime>30 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `51` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure this follows your semver policy.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version number correctly updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_vMA6qUV9Y7E3IS3t`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-09T09:27:37Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on cc7d602f1e9af0cc4c84eaf31125ad1d3333c41d in <ellipsistime>39 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `51` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct; ensure it remains consistent with the CHANGELOG and release documentation.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version number updated correctly from 1.481.0 to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_8FGHhlcGVhqpScMs`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-09T09:41:32Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on d42d094ef607819b90968992dc136eacef9e3105 in <ellipsistime>24 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `52` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump update looks correct. Please ensure that other version references are updated if necessary.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. This matches the CHANGELOG and appears correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_2O06hTmiK49uReET`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-09T17:43:32Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on cfe13522eb6c745cbae15d7bcc8f36be0344d7d2 in <ellipsistime>33 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `52` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 is noted. Ensure consistency with other version-related files if any.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure consistency with the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_ExnaVKNBwWCiOvCx`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-09T23:23:12Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 398a335b0f199d0e22071e6a10e92d9006dae39b in <ellipsistime>32 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `53` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0 correctly.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0; ensure it matches the release notes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_kV6F04LUwCGqGRKr`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-10T00:58:31Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 4d3f684e12519034f5e370bec29f5871d934c8d2 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 31 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `53` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct. Ensure this matches the changelog and other version references.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 is correct. Ensure consistency with changelog and release process.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The updated file contains extra prefixes ('L1:' and 'L2:') that are not needed and could lead to confusion. The version file should contain just the version number (e.g., '1.482.0'). Please remove these prefixes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The diff only shows a version number change, but the full file context reveals prefixes that weren't shown in the diff. This means the prefixes existed before and weren't added in this PR. The comment is addressing pre-existing code structure rather than changes made in this PR.
The prefixes might actually serve some purpose that I'm not aware of without more context. Also, since they weren't added in this PR, is it appropriate to raise this issue here?
According to the rules, we should only comment on changes made in this PR, not pre-existing code. Even if the prefixes are problematic, this isn't the right place to raise that issue.
The comment should be deleted because it addresses pre-existing code structure rather than changes made in this PR.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_3upZOrJ4I3kMPMTl`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-10T01:03:40Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 0a8f84028bf8719873b998e945beda150beb9ac1 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 10 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `53` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump correctly updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated correctly to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:15</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The changelog inconsistently refers to Svelte version as 'svelte5' (no space) in the Features section versus 'svelte 5' in the Bug Fixes section. Consider standardizing the formatting (e.g., using 'svelte 5') for consistency and improved readability.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a stylistic inconsistency, which does not require a code change. It is not about a functional issue or a bug, and it does not impact the logic of the code. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for a necessary comment.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules specify that comments should only be made if a code change is required. This is a stylistic issue, not a functional one.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a stylistic issue rather than a functional one that requires a code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_4e6ZBZDEYfJjJqdT`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-10T11:32:53Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 0fc682b5a929b096d7e87d25d3eb5af644dde076 in <ellipsistime>23 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `53` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated. Ensure consistency with CHANGELOG and versioning conventions.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated correctly from 1.481.0 to 1.482.0; ensure it remains consistent with other version references.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_sYqGNJKNOy1dUCYh`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-10T11:37:35Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 5a256f0efb3226ac296a70eb9102ab6347dafe95 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 10 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `53` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump is correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:22</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the 'Dynamic select does not work with tag //native' entry, the double slash ('//') seems accidental and may confuse readers. Consider revising it (e.g., to 'tag native' or clarifying the intent) to improve clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about the wording in the changelog, which is not a code change. The changelog is meant to document changes, and the wording might be intentional to reflect the actual tag used in the code. The comment does not suggest a code change, only a wording change in the changelog.
The comment might be useful if the wording in the changelog is indeed incorrect or misleading. However, without evidence that the wording is wrong, it seems speculative.
The changelog might be using the exact syntax from the code, and changing it could lead to confusion if the syntax is correct.
The comment should be deleted as it does not suggest a code change and is speculative about the wording in the changelog.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_QSZtUpGYlXkNuAYJ`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-10T16:56:52Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on cd748b2130989b97cbd8f2d24336ed4ab3b4575c in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 37 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `53` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `9` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0; change is correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Confirm this version is correctly synchronized with the release tags and changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:12</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'http' to 'HTTP' in the 'agent workers v2 using HTTP' entry for consistency with common acronyms.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The capitalization of 'http' to 'HTTP' is a minor stylistic suggestion and does not impact the functionality or logic of the code. According to the rules, comments should only be kept if they suggest a necessary code change, not purely stylistic ones.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be crucial for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize comments that address necessary code changes over stylistic suggestions. This comment does not indicate a necessary change.
The comment should be deleted as it suggests a stylistic change rather than a necessary code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' in the entries 'handle sending selected lines to AI context' and 'Implement sending diff to AI'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change that is required. The rules specify not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant, and this seems to fall into that category. The capitalization of 'AI' is a minor stylistic issue and does not affect the functionality or logic of the code.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistent capitalization in documentation, which can be important for professionalism and clarity.
While consistency in documentation is important, the rules prioritize comments that address necessary code changes. This stylistic change does not seem to meet that threshold.
The comment should be deleted as it addresses a minor stylistic issue rather than a necessary code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:21</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'svelte 5' to 'Svelte 5' in the 'app editor Svelte 5 fixes' entry for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The changelog is not part of the code logic, and the capitalization of 'svelte 5' does not affect the functionality or logic of the code. Therefore, this comment does not suggest a necessary code change.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules specify not to comment on purely stylistic or unimportant changes, and this does not affect the code logic.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a necessary code change and is purely stylistic.

</details>

<details>
<summary>6. <code>CHANGELOG.md:27</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'svelte 5' to 'Svelte 5' in the 'flow editor Svelte 5 issues' entry for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to comment on purely informative or unimportant issues. Capitalization for consistency is a minor stylistic issue and does not require a code change.
I might be underestimating the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be crucial for professional presentation.
While consistency is important, the rules prioritize actionable code changes over stylistic suggestions. This comment does not indicate a necessary code change.
The comment should be deleted as it pertains to a minor stylistic issue rather than a necessary code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>7. <code>CHANGELOG.md:23</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'cli:' to 'CLI:' in the entry '**cli:** properly handle enabled/disabled updates of schedules' for uniformity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change, which is not a code change. The changelog entry is understandable as it is, and the capitalization of 'cli:' does not affect functionality. The comment does not point out a functional issue or a necessary code change.
I might be overlooking the importance of uniformity in documentation, but the rules emphasize code changes, not stylistic or documentation uniformity.
While uniformity in documentation is generally good, it is not a code change, and the rules prioritize code changes over stylistic suggestions.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a necessary code change and focuses on a stylistic suggestion.

</details>

<details>
<summary>8. <code>CHANGELOG.md:33</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider changing 'ca_cert' to 'CA_CERT' in the 'mssql CA_CERT deserializing' entry for consistency with naming conventions.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a naming convention in a changelog entry, which is not a functional change. The changelog is meant to document changes, not enforce naming conventions. The comment does not indicate a code change is required, so it may not be necessary to keep it.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and understanding.
While consistency is important, the changelog is not the place to enforce naming conventions, as it is a record of changes rather than code itself.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a functional change and is not necessary for the changelog.

</details>

<details>
<summary>9. <code>CHANGELOG.md:38</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider changing 'tenant id' to 'tenant ID' in the 'tenant id to never be undefined on teams' entry for consistency.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a stylistic change in the changelog, which is not a code change. It does not indicate a bug or issue that needs to be addressed. According to the rules, comments should only be kept if they indicate a necessary code change.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for readability and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the rules specify that comments should only be kept if they indicate a necessary code change, not stylistic changes in documentation.
The comment should be deleted as it does not indicate a necessary code change and is purely stylistic.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_owni3VCVSyIUf3sl`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-10T20:31:54Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on f600e463b4114c3daacff06eca0c0e31b6038125 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 18 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `54` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure consistency with CHANGELOG.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
This trivial update ensures version alignment; no further changes required.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0, which looks consistent with the release. Ensure this is in sync with other version references.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:27</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typo suggestion: In the 'mssql ca_cert deserializing' bullet point, consider replacing 'deserializing' with 'deserialization' for clearer and more standard terminology.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about a changelog entry, which is not a code change. The rules specify not to comment on non-code changes unless there's a clear code change required. This is a suggestion for clearer terminology, not a necessary code change.
I might be overlooking the importance of clear documentation, but the rules emphasize code changes, not documentation clarity.
While clear documentation is important, the rules are clear about focusing on code changes, not documentation or changelog entries.
The comment should be deleted as it does not pertain to a code change and is more about documentation clarity.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_EyAdBhuDX9L8uKdy`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-10T20:42:24Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 7a5de6c8c605fe52765fcc5c9ff8dee466933189 in <ellipsistime>28 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `54` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0 as expected.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Looks good.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_RMixyT4KLfg7Jj1n`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-10T21:16:12Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 4055e643276c58f82f9278710e1c783ab7ee691c in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 11 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `54` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0. Ensure this matches the release tag and CHANGELOG entry.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is asking the PR author to ensure that the version update matches the release tag and CHANGELOG entry. This falls under the category of asking the author to double-check things, which is against the rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct. Ensure consistency with changelog and other version references.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There is an inconsistency in the way 'Svelte' is referenced: one entry uses 'svelte5' (no space) while others use 'svelte 5' (with a space). Please standardize the naming for clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is informative and does not suggest a code change. It points out a naming inconsistency, which is not critical to the functionality or logic of the code. The rules specify not to make purely informative comments.
I might be overlooking the importance of consistency in documentation, which can be important for clarity and professionalism.
While consistency is important, the comment does not suggest a specific code change and is purely informative, which violates the rules.
The comment should be deleted as it is purely informative and does not suggest a code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_VklXxWMRpkweAdvn`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-11T08:25:28Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on dfa19e4b410c75648b0025d93e27b794ddc6ffef in <ellipsistime>40 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `54` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Ensure version bump is consistent with changelog and project artifacts.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is asking the author to ensure consistency between the version bump and the changelog/project artifacts. It is not a specific suggestion or a request for a test, and it falls under the category of asking the author to double-check something. Therefore, it violates the rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure this matches the release notes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_xvH0ADN7YXnQT5HF`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-11T15:20:19Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on b939ee6154284b7cdebe1d62eeae3caa7e47bac4 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 12 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `55` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure this matches the new release version.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump update to 1.482.0 is correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:17</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the '**postgres-trigger:**' commit message, the phrase "fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource" is confusing. It might be clearer if reworded (for example, perhaps "fix circular dependencies and add removal of associated resource") so that the intended changes are obvious.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about rewording a commit message for clarity, which is not a code change. The changelog is a documentation file, and the comment does not suggest a code change. According to the rules, comments should only be kept if they suggest a code change.
I might be overlooking the importance of clear documentation, but the rules specify focusing on code changes.
While clear documentation is important, the rules are clear that comments should focus on code changes.
The comment should be deleted because it does not pertain to a code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_mV0N9F2StWXbpspv`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-11T16:04:24Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Incremental review on 262444d41c95cb4d430a209e758b0f1dae805d2f in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 9 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `57` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Confirm that this aligns with the changelog and release process.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0; ensure this aligns with the CHANGELOG.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_xCJvpxjm4wGAEt82`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-11T17:45:29Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on a89e81c3ceac48415272f71eb8bfde78f8638bf0 in <ellipsistime>23 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `57` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version number updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks good. Ensure it matches the CHANGELOG version.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_CT38rym4IOM0abZd`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-11T18:03:46Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on f0f1e79c50aa4c69a5c4ea1526bbbe6f747cde31 in <ellipsistime>22 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `57` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version update is correct. Ensure it remains consistent with the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:2</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Empty line is acceptable if intentional.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump from 1.481.0 to 1.482.0 looks good.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_t6kQ1CrprGIn3lHG`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-11T20:37:44Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 36e6ca25e06c5158c2b2ddc10c08e1b21e837038 in <ellipsistime>41 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `57` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump correctly updated.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0. Confirm this change is in sync with the changelog release notes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_1TXGeTIc8QqpzhG3`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-11T21:22:03Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 6bf11e987c14864067b38e65beb0417af1b64ccd in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 14 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `58` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 is correctly applied.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Confirm that this is consistent with the CHANGELOG and release tagging.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The description for postgres-trigger reads 'postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource'. The phrase 'add remove associate resource' seems off. Perhaps it should be rephrased to something like 'fix circular dependencies and remove associated resource' (or clarify the intent) to improve clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a potential issue with clarity in the changelog entry. However, changelog entries are often brief and may not require perfect grammar or clarity as long as the intended audience understands the changes. The comment does not suggest a code change, only a rephrasing for clarity, which may not be necessary.
The changelog is a documentation file, and clarity can be important for understanding changes. However, the comment does not point out a functional issue, just a potential improvement in wording.
While clarity is important, the changelog entry is likely understandable to its intended audience, and the comment does not suggest a change to the code itself.
The comment does not address a code change or a functional issue, so it should be deleted.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_A6PBRs6j7DS2ZZ9m`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-11T21:34:58Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Incremental review on 12238bdd9e9499d813889a6db49eb34e728cb6f1 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 3 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `58` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 is correctly updated. Please double-check it matches the release notes and semver guidelines.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_hbIdyJZIV4ihwoYU`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-11T22:39:51Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8bee976016f9a532c91431f70d8283525cc6ef24 in <ellipsistime>22 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `58` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated correctly to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 is correct and consistent with changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_4g6RE205MQ6GmRQW`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-11T23:07:22Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Incremental review on 664ac79e685e4b01d94d37af0cd288d2e9eb3f60 in <ellipsistime>58 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `58` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bumped to 1.482.0, which looks correct for this release.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 is correct. Please ensure it aligns with the CHANGELOG and other version references.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_6H1yPIHKl1CnJ1BL`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-12T11:12:16Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Incremental review on 395a25cbb23702f76c54d837f0ad938d2075c767 in <ellipsistime>59 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `58` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks good. Ensure this reflects all version metadata in the project.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct and consistent with the changelog update.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_r0OCF8ama9ZldkbH`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-12T12:56:57Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on d33b9b2ae718c52d2669a575a1079f68b881463c in <ellipsistime>31 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `58` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure consistency with changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump correctly updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_ptNWW0YXTIkxRWNR`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-12T14:50:13Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :x: Changes requested. Incremental review on f117ba18d50d5a6972b4a566cb383e58517c2d7c in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 20 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `58` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump correctly updated to 1.482.0.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure this is consistent with the changelog and release tags.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_XgRNG5V1MxMr83Sh`</workflowid>

</details>


----
**Want Ellipsis to fix these issues?** Tag `@ellipsis-dev` in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-12T15:05:51Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8d50e1e9c678e0d02de9aabb27166071653aec28 in <ellipsistime>43 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `58` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `2` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated correctly.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure it matches the changelog version.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_kWlWNGYdCli9HM8i`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-12T15:29:24Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on c020b6db55e57c2b42d09f7da02d0e26f26fc278 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 22 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `58` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct. Confirm that it aligns with the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0; this looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:17</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There's a typographical/phrasing issue in the postgres-trigger entry. The text "fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource" is unclear. Perhaps rephrase it to something like "fix circular dependencies and remove associated resources" or clarify the intended action.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment addresses a potential clarity issue in the changelog entry, which could be important for understanding the changes made. However, changelog entries are not typically critical for code functionality, and the phrasing issue might not necessitate a code change.
The comment might be considered unimportant as it pertains to phrasing in a changelog, which does not affect the code's functionality. The changelog is more about documentation than code logic.
While the changelog is documentation, clear communication of changes is important for users and developers to understand updates. If the phrasing is genuinely unclear, it could be worth addressing.
The comment addresses a phrasing issue in the changelog, which is not directly related to code functionality. It might not be necessary to keep this comment as it doesn't require a code change.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_4vAwojWefvuNL2oa`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-14T10:21:55Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 32b79b46a5e81da0bb1c3f5b746f2786db1b9d95 in <ellipsistime>2 minutes and 3 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `61` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version updated to 1.482.0; seems correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct and aligns with the changelog update.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:19</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
There's a potential typo in the postgres-trigger bullet: "postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource". The phrase "add remove" appears ambiguous and likely should be rephrased (perhaps to "fix circular dependencies and remove associated resource" or similar) for clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50%
The rules say not to comment unless a code change is required, and to avoid purely informative comments. However, this is a changelog, and the comment is about a typo or unclear language in a newly added line. The comment is actionable (suggests a rewording) and is about a change in the diff. However, the rules may consider changelog wording as not important enough to warrant a comment unless it is a critical error. The ambiguity in the phrase is real, but it's not a code logic issue.
I may be overvaluing the importance of changelog clarity. The rules emphasize only commenting when a code change is required, and not for unimportant or obvious issues. Typos in changelogs may not rise to the level of requiring a comment.
However, the changelog is part of the codebase and is user-facing documentation. If the typo causes confusion, it could be worth correcting, especially since the comment is specific and actionable.
Given the rules, this comment is borderline. It is about a change in the diff and is actionable, but may not be important enough to warrant a comment. I will give it a low intermediate grade, leaning toward deletion but acknowledging some value.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_zUGvrw0vWqGb73ql`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-15T08:18:41Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on baf6a1b2cd1972ce238e5bde9e25b6b28bad0151 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 49 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `61` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Confirmed version bump to 1.482.0 is correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions. It simply confirms a version bump, which is not necessary for the PR author to know. It violates the rule against making purely informative comments.

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:19</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the commit message for **postgres-trigger**, the phrase "add remove associate resource" seems off. Did you mean "remove associated resource" or something similar?
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about the wording of a commit message in the changelog, not about a code change. The rules explicitly say not to comment on PR descriptions or to make purely informative comments. There is no code change required here, and the comment is not actionable in terms of code quality or logic. This should be deleted.
Perhaps the changelog is important for documentation and clarity, and a typo could be worth correcting. However, the rules are clear about not commenting on such things unless a code change is required.
Even if the changelog is important, the rules prioritize only actionable, code-related comments. This is not actionable in the context of code changes.
The comment should be deleted because it is not about a code change and is purely informative about commit message wording. It does not meet the criteria for a useful review comment.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_uH3Z4K0zvJuw8wPL`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-15T08:24:12Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 561c939927fab0cb0c0728d1031d9ede1c141ca6 in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 42 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `61` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump update to 1.482.0 looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0; this is consistent with the changelog update.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:14</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the changelog entry '* handle sending selected lines to ai context', consider capitalizing 'ai' to 'AI' for consistency with similar references in the project.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
This comment is about a stylistic change in the changelog, not about code logic or a required code change. The rules explicitly say not to make comments unless a code change is required and to avoid unimportant comments. This is a minor consistency suggestion and does not warrant a review comment per the rules.
Perhaps consistency in documentation is important, but the rules prioritize actionable code changes over minor style suggestions in documentation.
Even if consistency is desirable, the rules are clear that such minor, non-actionable comments should not be made. This is not a code logic issue.
The comment should be deleted as it is a minor, non-actionable style suggestion and does not pertain to a required code change.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:8</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the changelog entry '* add gcp trigger', consider capitalizing 'gcp' to 'GCP' to maintain consistency with other similar entries and industry-standard naming.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment is about capitalization in a changelog, which is a minor stylistic issue. The rules explicitly say not to make comments unless a code change is required, and not to make unimportant or purely informative comments. This is not a logic or actionable code quality issue. Therefore, the comment should be deleted.
Perhaps consistent capitalization in documentation could be important for some teams, but the rules here are clear about not commenting on such minor issues.
Even if consistency is desirable, the rules prioritize actionable, logic-related feedback over stylistic suggestions in documentation.
The comment should be deleted because it is purely stylistic and not actionable per the review rules.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_Lv3rOa6MqW8iEdXr`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-15T11:11:11Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 5b26237e915d999da6a9310aed04569455c049bb in <ellipsistime>1 minute and 51 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `61` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `5` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Confirm that bump to 1.482.0 is intentional and consistent with the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 looks correct.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Consider capitalizing 'azure' to 'Azure' in the bullet point '* make azure a standalone AI provider' to correctly reference the brand name.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
This comment is about a minor stylistic issue in a changelog, not about code logic or a required code change. The rules explicitly say not to make unimportant or purely informative comments, and this is both. There is no strong evidence that this change is required for functionality or correctness. The changelog is not a place where such minor style corrections are critical.
Perhaps consistent branding is important for professionalism, but the rules prioritize actionable, necessary code changes over style in documentation.
Even if branding consistency is desirable, the rules are clear that such minor, non-functional suggestions should not be made in review comments.
The comment should be deleted as it is not actionable or necessary according to the rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:18</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
The bullet '* **postgres-trigger:** postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource' contains the phrase 'add remove associate resource'. This phrase is unclear. Consider rephrasing it, e.g., '... fix circular dependencies and remove associated resources' if that is the intended meaning.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
The rules specify not to comment on PR descriptions or changelogs unless there is a clear code change required. This comment is about wording in a changelog, not about code logic or a required code change. The comment is not actionable in terms of code, and the rules say to avoid purely informative or speculative comments. Therefore, this comment should be deleted.
Perhaps improving changelog clarity is valuable, but the rules are clear that such comments are not within scope unless they pertain to code changes.
Even if changelog clarity is important, the rules explicitly say not to comment on non-code or documentation unless a code change is required.
This comment should be deleted because it is not about a code change and is not actionable per the rules.

</details>

<details>
<summary>5. <code>CHANGELOG.md:30</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
In the bullet '* **frontend:** app builder - force json configuration in rich result', consider capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' for consistency since it's an acronym.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
This comment is about a stylistic change in documentation, not a code change. The rules explicitly state not to make comments that are purely informative or unimportant. Capitalizing 'json' to 'JSON' is a minor style issue and does not require a code change. Therefore, this comment should be deleted as it does not meet the criteria for actionable, required code changes.
Perhaps consistent documentation is important, and some teams may want to enforce such style even in changelogs. However, the rules here are clear about not making comments unless a code change is required.
Even if documentation consistency is valued, the rules for this review are strict and do not allow for purely stylistic or informative comments in changelogs.
The comment should be deleted because it is a minor, purely stylistic suggestion in documentation and does not require a code change, which is against the review rules.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_hmNrrHfNfGdnyybL`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-15T14:16:31Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on 6dcebe8142ead46a4fc937aa5690ade32c6af8db in <ellipsistime>59 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `61` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `4` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0; ensure consistency in release process.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure consistency with the release notes.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:16</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical error: In the bullet "make azure a standalone AI provider", 'azure' should be capitalized as 'Azure'.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is purely informative and focuses on a typographical error in a bullet point. It does not provide a code suggestion or address a potential issue in the code itself. According to the rules, purely informative comments should be removed.

</details>

<details>
<summary>4. <code>CHANGELOG.md:18</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Typographical error: In the commit message "**postgres-trigger:** postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource", the phrase "add remove" is unclear and likely a typo. Please review and correct it (perhaps it should be 'and remove associated resource' or similar).
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
The comment is pointing out a typographical error in the commit message. While it is specific, it is not related to the code itself but rather to the commit message. According to the rules, comments should focus on the code changes rather than commit messages or descriptions. Therefore, this comment should be removed.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_dOY8tWyd13EGhwPI`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-15T15:23:11Z
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: :+1: Looks good to me! Incremental review on a9f87d8ca49849f75d8d609733fcc7b7c19ffd79 in <ellipsistime>41 seconds</ellipsistime>

<details>
<summary>More details</summary>

 - Looked at `62` lines of code in `2` files
 - Skipped `0` files when reviewing.
 - Skipped posting `3` drafted comments based on config settings.


<details>
<summary>1. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump updated to 1.482.0. Ensure it is consistent with the changelog release version.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>2. <code>version.txt:1</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Version bump to 1.482.0 is correct. Ensure this is synchronized with the changelog.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Confidence changes required: `0%` <= threshold `50%`
None

</details>

<details>
<summary>3. <code>CHANGELOG.md:19</code></summary>

- **Draft comment:** 
Minor typo: In the postgres-trigger commit message, consider using 'associated resource' instead of 'associate resource' for clarity.
- **Reason this comment was not posted:** 
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = `0%` <= threshold `50%`
This comment is purely informative and suggests a minor change in the commit message for clarity. It doesn't address any code issues or improvements.

</details>


Workflow ID: <workflowid>`wflow_funIZYXrD28OKyPx`</workflowid>

</details>


----
You can customize Ellipsis with :+1: / :-1: [feedback](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/review), review rules, user-specific overrides, `quiet` mode, and [more](https://docs.ellipsis.dev/config).

state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-04-15T17:54:00Z

Review comments:
diff_hunk: @@ -1,5 +1,29 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [1.482.0](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/compare/v1.481.0...v1.482.0) (2025-04-05)
+
+
+### Features
+
+* add diff toggle to flow inline scripts ([#5550](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5550)) ([b3ecde3](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b3ecde3316252bcd7323de98149786349019ba7e))
+* add windmill context to autocomplete ([#5548](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5548)) ([b47c151](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b47c15165f93ca68a58f81cf2b86fc9467155482))
+* handle sending selected lines to ai context ([#5527](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5527)) ([5abdc3e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/5abdc3e4403b5c604309bd99a24d7a2847a17b9b))
+* Implement sending diff to ai ([#5510](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5510)) ([e118d2c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/e118d2cd5f9c641884a76229802a5228ef41f1a5))
+* make azure a standalone AI provider ([#5558](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5558)) ([2c5e58c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/2c5e58cf1ab9225d516540b38d9e4dde482a3a7f))
+* migrate to svelte5 + vite6 ([#4813](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/4813)) ([3c99b3f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3c99b3fdc7b78b1cdc7d8fb21d999296695f7889))
path: CHANGELOG.md
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Consider standardizing the capitalization of framework and tooling names. The changelog shows 'svelte5' (line 13) and later 'svelte 5' (lines 17, 20, 24). It might be clearer to use a consistent format such as 'Svelte 5' and similarly 'Vite 6' instead of 'vite6'.
created_at: 2025-04-05T10:52:56Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -1,5 +1,32 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [1.482.0](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/compare/v1.481.0...v1.482.0) (2025-04-05)
+
+
+### Features
+
+* add diff toggle to flow inline scripts ([#5550](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5550)) ([b3ecde3](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b3ecde3316252bcd7323de98149786349019ba7e))
+* add wildcards filter for worker/label/tags ([62f14d1](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/62f14d1cb95e3f1c7de85c46e1c6bb092247656c))
+* add windmill context to autocomplete ([#5548](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5548)) ([b47c151](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b47c15165f93ca68a58f81cf2b86fc9467155482))
+* handle sending selected lines to ai context ([#5527](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5527)) ([5abdc3e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/5abdc3e4403b5c604309bd99a24d7a2847a17b9b))
+* Implement sending diff to ai ([#5510](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5510)) ([e118d2c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/e118d2cd5f9c641884a76229802a5228ef41f1a5))
path: CHANGELOG.md
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Typo: In the entry '* Implement sending diff to ai', 'ai' should be 'AI'.
created_at: 2025-04-05T14:14:02Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -1,5 +1,45 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [1.482.0](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/compare/v1.481.0...v1.482.0) (2025-04-11)
+
+
+### Features
+
+* add diff toggle to flow inline scripts ([#5550](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5550)) ([b3ecde3](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b3ecde3316252bcd7323de98149786349019ba7e))
+* add gcp trigger ([#5501](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5501)) ([6339775](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63397754046eed41d32e28d4698db37b4c9b9710))
+* add wildcards filter for worker/label/tags ([62f14d1](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/62f14d1cb95e3f1c7de85c46e1c6bb092247656c))
+* add windmill context to autocomplete ([#5548](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5548)) ([b47c151](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b47c15165f93ca68a58f81cf2b86fc9467155482))
+* agent workers v2 using http ([#5588](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5588)) ([63fa499](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63fa4990153f33434b49269922f7803d04e407cd))
+* **frontend:** app editor code input component (monaco) ([#5566](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5566)) ([177e16b](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/177e16bb18eed0d1c454b967aaa59547f61e8d26))
+* handle sending selected lines to ai context ([#5527](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5527)) ([5abdc3e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/5abdc3e4403b5c604309bd99a24d7a2847a17b9b))
+* Implement sending diff to ai ([#5510](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5510)) ([e118d2c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/e118d2cd5f9c641884a76229802a5228ef41f1a5))
+* make azure a standalone AI provider ([#5558](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5558)) ([2c5e58c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/2c5e58cf1ab9225d516540b38d9e4dde482a3a7f))
+* migrate to svelte5 + vite6 ([#4813](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/4813)) ([3c99b3f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3c99b3fdc7b78b1cdc7d8fb21d999296695f7889))
+* **postgres-trigger:** postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource ([#5606](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5606)) ([1daeb2f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/1daeb2f48f3026621b3ffc58e10f048d5911906c))
path: CHANGELOG.md
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Typographical error: In the `postgres-trigger` bullet, the phrase "add remove associate resource" should likely be "add remove associated resource" (or similar). Please verify and correct.
created_at: 2025-04-11T17:45:29Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -1,5 +1,46 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [1.482.0](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/compare/v1.481.0...v1.482.0) (2025-04-11)
+
+
+### Features
+
+* add diff toggle to flow inline scripts ([#5550](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5550)) ([b3ecde3](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b3ecde3316252bcd7323de98149786349019ba7e))
+* add gcp trigger ([#5501](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5501)) ([6339775](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63397754046eed41d32e28d4698db37b4c9b9710))
+* add wildcards filter for worker/label/tags ([62f14d1](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/62f14d1cb95e3f1c7de85c46e1c6bb092247656c))
+* add windmill context to autocomplete ([#5548](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5548)) ([b47c151](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b47c15165f93ca68a58f81cf2b86fc9467155482))
+* agent workers v2 using http ([#5588](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5588)) ([63fa499](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63fa4990153f33434b49269922f7803d04e407cd))
+* **frontend:** app editor code input component (monaco) ([#5566](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5566)) ([177e16b](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/177e16bb18eed0d1c454b967aaa59547f61e8d26))
+* handle sending selected lines to ai context ([#5527](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5527)) ([5abdc3e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/5abdc3e4403b5c604309bd99a24d7a2847a17b9b))
+* Implement sending diff to ai ([#5510](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5510)) ([e118d2c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/e118d2cd5f9c641884a76229802a5228ef41f1a5))
+* make azure a standalone AI provider ([#5558](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5558)) ([2c5e58c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/2c5e58cf1ab9225d516540b38d9e4dde482a3a7f))
+* migrate to svelte5 + vite6 ([#4813](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/4813)) ([3c99b3f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3c99b3fdc7b78b1cdc7d8fb21d999296695f7889))
+* **postgres-trigger:** postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource ([#5606](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5606)) ([1daeb2f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/1daeb2f48f3026621b3ffc58e10f048d5911906c))
path: CHANGELOG.md
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: Typo noticed: In the bullet for **postgres-trigger**, the text reads "... fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource". This phrasing is confusing and likely not what was intended. Consider revising it, perhaps to "... fix circular dependencies and remove associated resource".
created_at: 2025-04-11T22:39:50Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -1,5 +1,46 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [1.482.0](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/compare/v1.481.0...v1.482.0) (2025-04-12)
+
+
+### Features
+
+* add diff toggle to flow inline scripts ([#5550](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5550)) ([b3ecde3](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b3ecde3316252bcd7323de98149786349019ba7e))
+* add gcp trigger ([#5501](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5501)) ([6339775](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63397754046eed41d32e28d4698db37b4c9b9710))
+* add wildcards filter for worker/label/tags ([62f14d1](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/62f14d1cb95e3f1c7de85c46e1c6bb092247656c))
+* add windmill context to autocomplete ([#5548](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5548)) ([b47c151](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b47c15165f93ca68a58f81cf2b86fc9467155482))
+* agent workers v2 using http ([#5588](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5588)) ([63fa499](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63fa4990153f33434b49269922f7803d04e407cd))
+* **frontend:** app editor code input component (monaco) ([#5566](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5566)) ([177e16b](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/177e16bb18eed0d1c454b967aaa59547f61e8d26))
+* handle sending selected lines to ai context ([#5527](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5527)) ([5abdc3e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/5abdc3e4403b5c604309bd99a24d7a2847a17b9b))
+* Implement sending diff to ai ([#5510](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5510)) ([e118d2c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/e118d2cd5f9c641884a76229802a5228ef41f1a5))
+* make azure a standalone AI provider ([#5558](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5558)) ([2c5e58c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/2c5e58cf1ab9225d516540b38d9e4dde482a3a7f))
+* migrate to svelte5 + vite6 ([#4813](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/4813)) ([3c99b3f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3c99b3fdc7b78b1cdc7d8fb21d999296695f7889))
+* **postgres-trigger:** postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource ([#5606](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5606)) ([1daeb2f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/1daeb2f48f3026621b3ffc58e10f048d5911906c))
path: CHANGELOG.md
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: There's a potential typographical error in the `postgres-trigger` bullet. The phrase "add remove associate resource" seems awkward and unclear. It might be intended to be "add/remove associated resource". Consider clarifying the wording.
created_at: 2025-04-12T11:12:16Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -1,5 +1,46 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [1.482.0](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/compare/v1.481.0...v1.482.0) (2025-04-12)
+
+
+### Features
+
+* add diff toggle to flow inline scripts ([#5550](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5550)) ([b3ecde3](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b3ecde3316252bcd7323de98149786349019ba7e))
+* add gcp trigger ([#5501](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5501)) ([6339775](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63397754046eed41d32e28d4698db37b4c9b9710))
+* add wildcards filter for worker/label/tags ([62f14d1](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/62f14d1cb95e3f1c7de85c46e1c6bb092247656c))
+* add windmill context to autocomplete ([#5548](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5548)) ([b47c151](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b47c15165f93ca68a58f81cf2b86fc9467155482))
+* agent workers v2 using http ([#5588](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5588)) ([63fa499](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63fa4990153f33434b49269922f7803d04e407cd))
+* **frontend:** app editor code input component (monaco) ([#5566](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5566)) ([177e16b](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/177e16bb18eed0d1c454b967aaa59547f61e8d26))
+* handle sending selected lines to ai context ([#5527](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5527)) ([5abdc3e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/5abdc3e4403b5c604309bd99a24d7a2847a17b9b))
+* Implement sending diff to ai ([#5510](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5510)) ([e118d2c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/e118d2cd5f9c641884a76229802a5228ef41f1a5))
+* make azure a standalone AI provider ([#5558](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5558)) ([2c5e58c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/2c5e58cf1ab9225d516540b38d9e4dde482a3a7f))
+* migrate to svelte5 + vite6 ([#4813](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/4813)) ([3c99b3f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3c99b3fdc7b78b1cdc7d8fb21d999296695f7889))
+* **postgres-trigger:** postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource ([#5606](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5606)) ([1daeb2f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/1daeb2f48f3026621b3ffc58e10f048d5911906c))
path: CHANGELOG.md
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: There appears to be a typographical/grammatical error in the postgres-trigger bullet. The phrase "fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource" is confusing. Consider rephrasing it, e.g., "fix circular dependencies and remove associated resources" or another phrasing that accurately reflects the intended changes.
created_at: 2025-04-12T12:56:57Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -1,5 +1,46 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [1.482.0](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/compare/v1.481.0...v1.482.0) (2025-04-12)
+
+
+### Features
+
+* add diff toggle to flow inline scripts ([#5550](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5550)) ([b3ecde3](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b3ecde3316252bcd7323de98149786349019ba7e))
+* add gcp trigger ([#5501](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5501)) ([6339775](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63397754046eed41d32e28d4698db37b4c9b9710))
+* add wildcards filter for worker/label/tags ([62f14d1](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/62f14d1cb95e3f1c7de85c46e1c6bb092247656c))
+* add windmill context to autocomplete ([#5548](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5548)) ([b47c151](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/b47c15165f93ca68a58f81cf2b86fc9467155482))
+* agent workers v2 using http ([#5588](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5588)) ([63fa499](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/63fa4990153f33434b49269922f7803d04e407cd))
+* **frontend:** app editor code input component (monaco) ([#5566](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5566)) ([177e16b](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/177e16bb18eed0d1c454b967aaa59547f61e8d26))
+* handle sending selected lines to ai context ([#5527](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5527)) ([5abdc3e](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/5abdc3e4403b5c604309bd99a24d7a2847a17b9b))
+* Implement sending diff to ai ([#5510](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5510)) ([e118d2c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/e118d2cd5f9c641884a76229802a5228ef41f1a5))
+* make azure a standalone AI provider ([#5558](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5558)) ([2c5e58c](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/2c5e58cf1ab9225d516540b38d9e4dde482a3a7f))
+* migrate to svelte5 + vite6 ([#4813](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/4813)) ([3c99b3f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/3c99b3fdc7b78b1cdc7d8fb21d999296695f7889))
+* **postgres-trigger:** postgres trigger fix circular dependencies and add remove associate resource ([#5606](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/issues/5606)) ([1daeb2f](https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/commit/1daeb2f48f3026621b3ffc58e10f048d5911906c))
path: CHANGELOG.md
user: login: ellipsis-dev[bot]
body: In the postgres-trigger feature description, the phrase 'and add remove associate resource' seems unclear and potentially contains a typo. Consider revising it to something clearer such as 'fix circular dependencies and add or remove associated resource' (if that is the intended meaning).
created_at: 2025-04-12T15:05:51Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR

PR comments:
user: login: cloudflare-workers-and-pages[bot]
created_at: 2025-04-02T21:35:23Z
body: ## Deploying windmill with &nbsp;<a href="https://pages.dev"><img alt="Cloudflare Pages" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23264/106598434-9e719e00-654f-11eb-9e59-6167043cfa01.png" width="16"></a> &nbsp;Cloudflare Pages

<table><tr><td><strong>Latest commit:</strong> </td><td>
<code>686271f</code>
</td></tr>
<tr><td><strong>Status:</strong></td><td>&nbsp;✅&nbsp; Deploy successful!</td></tr>
<tr><td><strong>Preview URL:</strong></td><td>
<a href='https://3c4f3e3f.windmill.pages.dev'>https://3c4f3e3f.windmill.pages.dev</a>
</td></tr>
<tr><td><strong>Branch Preview URL:</strong></td><td>
<a href='https://release-please--branches--ma.windmill.pages.dev'>https://release-please--branches--ma.windmill.pages.dev</a>
</td></tr>
</table>

[View logs](https://dash.cloudflare.com/f3802b49118373bb0dd68e319c9be207/pages/view/windmill/3c4f3e3f-9b6f-42e8-8fbb-cb309d2a6504)

author_association: NONE
user: login: rubenfiszel
created_at: 2025-04-15T19:58:27Z
body: :robot: Release is at https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/releases/tag/v1.482.0 :sunflower:
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR