Repository: GrandEngineering/engine
Pull request #25: Pagination
Author: login: IGN-Styly
Created: 2025-05-05T20:02:06Z | Merged: 2025-05-06T20:32:14Z



<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
	- Added the ability to retrieve paginated task data filtered by task state (Queued, Processing, or Solved) via the API.

- **Bug Fixes**
	- Resolved issues related to task state filtering and pagination in task retrieval responses.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->


Diff:
diff --git a/Cargo.lock b/Cargo.lock
index c3884cf..10ef767 100644
--- a/Cargo.lock
+++ b/Cargo.lock
@@ -355,9 +355,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "clap_complete"
-version = "4.5.48"
+version = "4.5.50"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "be8c97f3a6f02b9e24cadc12aaba75201d18754b53ea0a9d99642f806ccdb4c9"
+checksum = "c91d3baa3bcd889d60e6ef28874126a0b384fd225ab83aa6d8a801c519194ce1"
 dependencies = [
  "clap",
 ]
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ dependencies = [
 [[package]]
 name = "enginelib"
 version = "0.2.0"
-source = "git+https://github.com/GrandEngineering/enginelib.git#fa2b0bbccdf87511b51fc7b8e70b99e14c4e5260"
+source = "git+https://github.com/GrandEngineering/enginelib.git#75cdf1ef1294d6b25961cc4759a29daf54a0a895"
 dependencies = [
  "bincode",
  "chrono",
@@ -2045,9 +2045,9 @@ checksum = "4a5f13b858c8d314ee3e8f639011f7ccefe71f97f96e50151fb991f267928e2c"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "jiff"
-version = "0.2.12"
+version = "0.2.13"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "d07d8d955d798e7a4d6f9c58cd1f1916e790b42b092758a9ef6e16fef9f1b3fd"
+checksum = "f02000660d30638906021176af16b17498bd0d12813dbfe7b276d8bc7f3c0806"
 dependencies = [
  "jiff-static",
  "jiff-tzdb-platform",
@@ -2060,9 +2060,9 @@ dependencies = [
 
 [[package]]
 name = "jiff-static"
-version = "0.2.12"
+version = "0.2.13"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "f244cfe006d98d26f859c7abd1318d85327e1882dc9cef80f62daeeb0adcf300"
+checksum = "f3c30758ddd7188629c6713fc45d1188af4f44c90582311d0c8d8c9907f60c48"
 dependencies = [
  "proc-macro2",
  "quote",
@@ -2173,7 +2173,7 @@ checksum = "13dc2df351e3202783a1fe0d44375f7295ffb4049267b0f3018346dc122a1d94"
 [[package]]
 name = "macros"
 version = "0.1.0"
-source = "git+https://github.com/GrandEngineering/enginelib.git#fa2b0bbccdf87511b51fc7b8e70b99e14c4e5260"
+source = "git+https://github.com/GrandEngineering/enginelib.git#75cdf1ef1294d6b25961cc4759a29daf54a0a895"
 dependencies = [
  "proc-macro2",
  "quote",
@@ -3048,9 +3048,9 @@ checksum = "1f3ccbac311fea05f86f61904b462b55fb3df8837a366dfc601a0161d0532f20"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "tokio"
-version = "1.44.2"
+version = "1.45.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "e6b88822cbe49de4185e3a4cbf8321dd487cf5fe0c5c65695fef6346371e9c48"
+checksum = "2513ca694ef9ede0fb23fe71a4ee4107cb102b9dc1930f6d0fd77aae068ae165"
 dependencies = [
  "backtrace",
  "bytes",
diff --git a/proto/engine.proto b/proto/engine.proto
index fe8275e..9fa7823 100644
--- a/proto/engine.proto
+++ b/proto/engine.proto
@@ -6,22 +6,29 @@ service engine {
   rpc PublishTask(Task) returns (empty);
   rpc cgrpc(cgrpcmsg) returns (cgrpcmsg);
   rpc CreateTask(Task) returns (Task);
-  // rpc GetTasks(TaskPageRequest) returns (TaskPage);
+  rpc GetTasks(TaskPageRequest) returns (TaskPage);
 }
 
 message empty {}
+enum TaskState {
+  QUEUED = 0;
+  PROCESSING = 1;
+  SOLVED = 2;
+}
 message TaskPageRequest {
   string namespace = 1;
   string task = 2;
   uint64 page = 3;
   uint32 pageSize = 4;
+  TaskState state = 5;
 }
 message TaskPage {
   string namespace = 1;
   string task = 2;
   uint64 page = 3;
   uint32 pageSize = 4;
-  repeated Task tasks = 5;
+  TaskState state = 5;
+  repeated Task tasks = 6;
 }
 message cgrpcmsg {
   string handler_mod_id = 1;
diff --git a/src/bin/server.rs b/src/bin/server.rs
index afc6028..44cc78f 100644
--- a/src/bin/server.rs
+++ b/src/bin/server.rs
@@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ use enginelib::{
     event::{debug, info, warn},
     events::{self, Events, ID},
     plugin::LibraryManager,
-    task::{StoredTask, Task, TaskQueue},
+    task::{SolvedTasks, StoredExecutingTask, StoredTask, Task, TaskQueue},
+};
+use proto::{
+    TaskState,
+    engine_server::{Engine, EngineServer},
 };
-use proto::engine_server::{Engine, EngineServer};
 use std::{
     env::consts::OS,
     io::Read,
@@ -29,6 +32,94 @@ struct EngineService {
 }
 #[tonic::async_trait]
 impl Engine for EngineService {
+    async fn get_tasks(
+        &self,
+        request: tonic::Request<proto::TaskPageRequest>,
+    ) -> std::result::Result<tonic::Response<proto::TaskPage>, tonic::Status> {
+        let mut api = self.EngineAPI.write().await;
+        let challenge = get_auth(&request);
+        let uid = get_uid(&request);
+        let db = api.db.clone();
+        if !Events::CheckAuth(&mut api, uid, challenge, db) {
+            //TODO: change to AdminSpecific Auth
+            info!("GetTask denied due to Invalid Auth");
+            return Err(Status::permission_denied("Invalid authentication"));
+        };
+        let data = request.get_ref();
+
+        let q: Vec<proto::Task> = match data.clone().state() {
+            TaskState::Processing => {
+                let mut d = api
+                    .executing_tasks
+                    .clone()
+                    .tasks
+                    .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
+                    .unwrap()
+                    .clone();
+                d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
+                d.iter()
+                    .map(|f| proto::Task {
+                        id: f.id.clone(),
+                        task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
+                        task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
+                        payload: Vec::new(),
+                    })
+                    .collect()
+            }
+            TaskState::Queued => {
+                let mut d = api
+                    .task_queue
+                    .clone()
+                    .tasks
+                    .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
+                    .unwrap()
+                    .clone();
+                d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
+                d.iter()
+                    .map(|f| proto::Task {
+                        id: f.id.clone(),
+                        task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
+                        task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
+                        payload: Vec::new(),
+                    })
+                    .collect()
+            }
+            TaskState::Solved => {
+                let mut d = api
+                    .solved_tasks
+                    .clone()
+                    .tasks
+                    .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
+                    .unwrap()
+                    .clone();
+                d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
+                d.iter()
+                    .map(|f| proto::Task {
+                        id: f.id.clone(),
+                        task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
+                        task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
+                        payload: Vec::new(),
+                    })
+                    .collect()
+            }
+        };
+        let index = data.page * data.page_size as u64;
+        let end = index + data.page_size as u64;
+        let mut final_vec = Vec::new();
+        for n in index..end {
+            if q.len() > n as usize {
+                final_vec.push(q.get(n as usize).unwrap().clone());
+            }
+        }
+        return Ok(tonic::Response::new(proto::TaskPage {
+            namespace: data.namespace.clone(),
+            task: data.task.clone(),
+            page: data.page,
+            page_size: data.page_size,
+            state: data.state,
+            tasks: final_vec,
+        }));
+    }
     async fn cgrpc(
         &self,
         request: tonic::Request<proto::Cgrpcmsg>,


Reviews:
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: **Actionable comments posted: 4**

<details>
<summary>🧹 Nitpick comments (2)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>proto/engine.proto (1)</summary><blockquote>

`23-23`: **Inconsistent naming convention in proto definition.**

The proto file uses `pageSize` (camelCase) while the implementation code uses snake_case (`page_size`). Protocol Buffers has a convention of using snake_case for field names.

```diff
  string namespace = 1;
  string task = 2;
  uint64 page = 3;
- uint32 pageSize = 4;
+ uint32 page_size = 4;
  TaskState state = 5;
```

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>src/bin/server.rs (1)</summary><blockquote>

`106-113`: **Inefficient pagination implementation.**

The current pagination implementation calculates indices and iterates over them. This can be simplified using Rust's slice operations for better readability and potentially better performance.

Simplify the pagination logic:

```diff
-    let index = data.page * data.page_size as u64;
-    let end = index + data.page_size as u64;
-    let mut final_vec = Vec::new();
-    for n in index..end {
-        if q.len() > n as usize {
-            final_vec.push(q.get(n as usize).unwrap().clone());
-        }
-    }
+    let start_idx = (data.page * data.page_size as u64) as usize;
+    let end_idx = start_idx + data.page_size as usize;
+    let final_vec = q.iter()
+        .skip(start_idx)
+        .take(data.page_size as usize)
+        .cloned()
+        .collect();
```

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: CHILL**
**Plan: Pro**

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 001e919fddd8df53f3a8f08321f5b6bc51367366 and 2ea55e8e5e933f7a6850d9abc08b91c2e6619302.

</details>

<details>
<summary>⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)</summary>

* `Cargo.lock` is excluded by `!**/*.lock`

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (2)</summary>

* `proto/engine.proto` (1 hunks)
* `src/bin/server.rs` (2 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary>

<details>
<summary>🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)</summary>

<details>
<summary>src/bin/server.rs (1)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>src/lib.rs (2)</summary>

* `get_auth` (12-19)
* `get_uid` (3-10)

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (5)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>proto/engine.proto (3)</summary>

`9-9`: **LGTM! Good implementation of pagination.**

The addition of the `GetTasks` RPC enables clients to retrieve tasks in a paginated manner, which is essential for handling large datasets efficiently.

---

`13-17`: **Good design choice for task state modeling.**

The `TaskState` enum provides a clear definition of the possible states a task can be in. Using an enum ensures type safety and makes the API more maintainable.

---

`30-31`: **Good practice: keeping response fields consistent with request.**

The `TaskPage` response includes all fields from the request plus the actual task data, which provides good context for the client.

</details>
<details>
<summary>src/bin/server.rs (2)</summary>

`10-14`: **LGTM! Proper imports for the new functionality.**

The imports are correctly updated to include the necessary types for task handling and proto definitions.

---

`35-48`: <details>
<summary>❓ Verification inconclusive</summary>

**Enhanced authentication but potentially incorrect check type.**

The authentication check is implemented properly, but the TODO comment suggests it should be admin-specific. Consider using `CheckAdminAuth` instead of `CheckAuth` for administrative actions like retrieving all tasks.

---

🏁 Script executed:

```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's a CheckAdminAuth being used elsewhere in the codebase
rg "CheckAdminAuth" --type rust
```

Length of output: 94

---

🏁 Script executed:

```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Show usage of CheckAdminAuth to confirm its signature and context
rg -n "Events::CheckAdminAuth" -A3 -B3 --type rust
# Locate the definition of CheckAdminAuth to verify parameters
rg -n "fn CheckAdminAuth" -A3 -B3 --type rust
```

Length of output: 500

---



</details>

**Enforce admin‐level auth in `get_tasks`**

This RPC appears to return all tasks and should be restricted to admins. Instead of using `Events::CheckAuth`, switch to the admin check already in use elsewhere:

```diff
-    if !Events::CheckAuth(&mut api, uid, challenge, db) {
+    if !Events::CheckAdminAuth(&mut api, uid, challenge, db) {
         info!("GetTask denied due to insufficient admin permissions");
         return Err(Status::permission_denied("Admin authentication required"));
     };
```

• Remove the “TODO: change to AdminSpecific Auth”  
• Confirm that `Events::CheckAdminAuth` is defined, accepts the same parameters as `CheckAuth`, and is correctly imported before merging.

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-05-06T20:29:20Z
user: login: IGN-Styly
state: COMMENTED
author_association: MEMBER
submitted_at: 2025-05-06T20:31:04Z
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
state: COMMENTED
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
submitted_at: 2025-05-06T20:31:28Z

Review comments:
diff_hunk: @@ -29,6 +32,94 @@ struct EngineService {
 }
 #[tonic::async_trait]
 impl Engine for EngineService {
+    async fn get_tasks(
+        &self,
+        request: tonic::Request<proto::TaskPageRequest>,
+    ) -> std::result::Result<tonic::Response<proto::TaskPage>, tonic::Status> {
+        let mut api = self.EngineAPI.write().await;
+        let challenge = get_auth(&request);
+        let uid = get_uid(&request);
+        let db = api.db.clone();
+        if !Events::CheckAuth(&mut api, uid, challenge, db) {
+            //TODO: change to AdminSpecific Auth
+            info!("GetTask denied due to Invalid Auth");
+            return Err(Status::permission_denied("Invalid authentication"));
+        };
path: src/bin/server.rs
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🛠️ Refactor suggestion_

**Missing input validation for pagination parameters.**

The code doesn't validate the page size or page number, which could lead to inefficient queries if a client requests an extremely large page size or a very high page number.

Add input validation for pagination parameters:

```diff
    if !Events::CheckAuth(&mut api, uid, challenge, db) {
        //TODO: change to AdminSpecific Auth
        info!("GetTask denied due to Invalid Auth");
        return Err(Status::permission_denied("Invalid authentication"));
    };
+   
+   // Validate pagination parameters
+   const MAX_PAGE_SIZE: u32 = 100; // Choose an appropriate maximum
+   if data.page_size == 0 || data.page_size > MAX_PAGE_SIZE {
+       return Err(Status::invalid_argument(
+           format!("Page size must be between 1 and {}", MAX_PAGE_SIZE)
+       ));
+   }
+   
    let data = request.get_ref();
```


> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-06T20:29:19Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -29,6 +32,94 @@ struct EngineService {
 }
 #[tonic::async_trait]
 impl Engine for EngineService {
+    async fn get_tasks(
+        &self,
+        request: tonic::Request<proto::TaskPageRequest>,
+    ) -> std::result::Result<tonic::Response<proto::TaskPage>, tonic::Status> {
+        let mut api = self.EngineAPI.write().await;
+        let challenge = get_auth(&request);
+        let uid = get_uid(&request);
+        let db = api.db.clone();
+        if !Events::CheckAuth(&mut api, uid, challenge, db) {
+            //TODO: change to AdminSpecific Auth
+            info!("GetTask denied due to Invalid Auth");
+            return Err(Status::permission_denied("Invalid authentication"));
+        };
+        let data = request.get_ref();
+
+        let q: Vec<proto::Task> = match data.clone().state() {
+            TaskState::Processing => {
+                let mut d = api
+                    .executing_tasks
+                    .clone()
+                    .tasks
+                    .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
+                    .unwrap()
+                    .clone();
+                d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
+                d.iter()
+                    .map(|f| proto::Task {
+                        id: f.id.clone(),
+                        task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
+                        task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
+                        payload: Vec::new(),
+                    })
+                    .collect()
+            }
+            TaskState::Queued => {
+                let mut d = api
+                    .task_queue
+                    .clone()
+                    .tasks
+                    .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
+                    .unwrap()
+                    .clone();
+                d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
+                d.iter()
+                    .map(|f| proto::Task {
+                        id: f.id.clone(),
+                        task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
+                        task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
+                        payload: Vec::new(),
+                    })
+                    .collect()
+            }
+            TaskState::Solved => {
+                let mut d = api
+                    .solved_tasks
+                    .clone()
+                    .tasks
+                    .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
+                    .unwrap()
+                    .clone();
+                d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
+                d.iter()
+                    .map(|f| proto::Task {
+                        id: f.id.clone(),
+                        task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
+                        task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
+                        payload: Vec::new(),
+                    })
+                    .collect()
+            }
+        };
+        let index = data.page * data.page_size as u64;
+        let end = index + data.page_size as u64;
+        let mut final_vec = Vec::new();
+        for n in index..end {
+            if q.len() > n as usize {
+                final_vec.push(q.get(n as usize).unwrap().clone());
+            }
+        }
+        return Ok(tonic::Response::new(proto::TaskPage {
+            namespace: data.namespace.clone(),
+            task: data.task.clone(),
+            page: data.page,
+            page_size: data.page_size,
+            state: data.state,
+            tasks: final_vec,
+        }));
path: src/bin/server.rs
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🛠️ Refactor suggestion_

**Missing pagination metadata in response.**

For a complete pagination implementation, it's helpful to include the total count of items in the response. This allows clients to know how many pages exist in total.

Consider adding a total_count field to the TaskPage message in the proto file and including it in the response:

```diff
    return Ok(tonic::Response::new(proto::TaskPage {
        namespace: data.namespace.clone(),
        task: data.task.clone(),
        page: data.page,
        page_size: data.page_size,
        state: data.state,
        tasks: final_vec,
+       total_count: q.len() as u32, // Would require adding this field to the proto definition
    }));
```


> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-06T20:29:19Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -29,6 +32,94 @@ struct EngineService {
 }
 #[tonic::async_trait]
 impl Engine for EngineService {
+    async fn get_tasks(
+        &self,
+        request: tonic::Request<proto::TaskPageRequest>,
+    ) -> std::result::Result<tonic::Response<proto::TaskPage>, tonic::Status> {
+        let mut api = self.EngineAPI.write().await;
+        let challenge = get_auth(&request);
+        let uid = get_uid(&request);
+        let db = api.db.clone();
+        if !Events::CheckAuth(&mut api, uid, challenge, db) {
+            //TODO: change to AdminSpecific Auth
+            info!("GetTask denied due to Invalid Auth");
+            return Err(Status::permission_denied("Invalid authentication"));
+        };
+        let data = request.get_ref();
+
+        let q: Vec<proto::Task> = match data.clone().state() {
+            TaskState::Processing => {
+                let mut d = api
+                    .executing_tasks
+                    .clone()
+                    .tasks
+                    .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
+                    .unwrap()
+                    .clone();
+                d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
+                d.iter()
+                    .map(|f| proto::Task {
+                        id: f.id.clone(),
+                        task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
+                        task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
+                        payload: Vec::new(),
+                    })
+                    .collect()
+            }
+            TaskState::Queued => {
+                let mut d = api
+                    .task_queue
+                    .clone()
+                    .tasks
+                    .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
+                    .unwrap()
+                    .clone();
+                d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
+                d.iter()
+                    .map(|f| proto::Task {
+                        id: f.id.clone(),
+                        task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
+                        task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
+                        payload: Vec::new(),
+                    })
+                    .collect()
+            }
+            TaskState::Solved => {
+                let mut d = api
+                    .solved_tasks
+                    .clone()
+                    .tasks
+                    .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
+                    .unwrap()
+                    .clone();
+                d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
+                d.iter()
+                    .map(|f| proto::Task {
+                        id: f.id.clone(),
+                        task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
+                        task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
+                        payload: Vec::new(),
+                    })
+                    .collect()
+            }
+        };
path: src/bin/server.rs
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _⚠️ Potential issue_

**Missing error handling for non-existent task collections.**

The code uses `unwrap()` on the result of `get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))` which will panic if the specified namespace/task combination doesn't exist in the respective collection.

Add proper error handling for non-existent collections:

```diff
    let q: Vec<proto::Task> = match data.clone().state() {
        TaskState::Processing => {
-            let mut d = api
-                .executing_tasks
-                .clone()
-                .tasks
-                .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
-                .unwrap()
-                .clone();
+            let mut d = match api
+                .executing_tasks
+                .clone()
+                .tasks
+                .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone())) {
+                    Some(tasks) => tasks.clone(),
+                    None => Vec::new(),
+                };
            d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
            d.iter()
                .map(|f| proto::Task {
                    id: f.id.clone(),
                    task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
                    task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
                    payload: Vec::new(),
                })
                .collect()
        }
        // Apply similar changes to the other match arms
```


<!-- suggestion_start -->

<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>

> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

`````suggestion
let q: Vec<proto::Task> = match data.clone().state() {
    TaskState::Processing => {
-        let mut d = api
-            .executing_tasks
-            .clone()
-            .tasks
-            .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
-            .unwrap()
-            .clone();
+        let mut d = match api
+            .executing_tasks
+            .clone()
+            .tasks
+            .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone())) {
+                Some(tasks) => tasks.clone(),
+                None => Vec::new(),
+            };
        d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
        d.iter()
            .map(|f| proto::Task {
                id: f.id.clone(),
                task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
                task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
                payload: Vec::new(),
            })
            .collect()
    }
    TaskState::Queued => {
        let mut d = api
            .task_queue
            .clone()
            .tasks
            .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
            .unwrap()
            .clone();
        d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
        d.iter()
            .map(|f| proto::Task {
                id: f.id.clone(),
                task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
                task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
                payload: Vec::new(),
            })
            .collect()
    }
    TaskState::Solved => {
        let mut d = api
            .solved_tasks
            .clone()
            .tasks
            .get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()))
            .unwrap()
            .clone();
        d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
        d.iter()
            .map(|f| proto::Task {
                id: f.id.clone(),
                task_id: vec![data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone()].join(":"),
                task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
                payload: Vec::new(),
            })
            .collect()
    }
};
`````

</details>

<!-- suggestion_end -->

---

_🛠️ Refactor suggestion_

**Significant code duplication across task state handling.**

The same operations (cloning, sorting, mapping) are repeated for each task state. This violates the DRY principle and makes maintenance more difficult.

Extract the common logic into a helper function:

```diff
+    fn get_tasks_for_collection<T>(
+        collection: &Option<Vec<T>>,
+        namespace: &str,
+        task_name: &str,
+    ) -> Vec<proto::Task>
+    where
+        T: Clone + HasId + HasBytes,
+    {
+        match collection {
+            Some(tasks) => {
+                let mut d = tasks.clone();
+                d.sort_by_key(|f| f.id.clone());
+                d.iter()
+                    .map(|f| proto::Task {
+                        id: f.id.clone(),
+                        task_id: vec![namespace, task_name].join(":"),
+                        task_payload: f.bytes.clone(),
+                        payload: Vec::new(),
+                    })
+                    .collect()
+            }
+            None => Vec::new(),
+        }
+    }

    let q: Vec<proto::Task> = match data.clone().state() {
        TaskState::Processing => {
            get_tasks_for_collection(
                &api.executing_tasks.clone().tasks.get(&(data.namespace.clone(), data.task.clone())),
                &data.namespace,
                &data.task,
            )
        }
        // Similar for other states
```


> Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-06T20:29:19Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
diff_hunk: @@ -29,6 +32,94 @@ struct EngineService {
 }
 #[tonic::async_trait]
 impl Engine for EngineService {
+    async fn get_tasks(
+        &self,
+        request: tonic::Request<proto::TaskPageRequest>,
+    ) -> std::result::Result<tonic::Response<proto::TaskPage>, tonic::Status> {
+        let mut api = self.EngineAPI.write().await;
+        let challenge = get_auth(&request);
+        let uid = get_uid(&request);
+        let db = api.db.clone();
+        if !Events::CheckAuth(&mut api, uid, challenge, db) {
+            //TODO: change to AdminSpecific Auth
+            info!("GetTask denied due to Invalid Auth");
+            return Err(Status::permission_denied("Invalid authentication"));
+        };
path: src/bin/server.rs
user: login: IGN-Styly
body: i used a u32 limiting the max to 2^32-1
created_at: 2025-05-06T20:31:04Z
author_association: MEMBER
diff_hunk: @@ -29,6 +32,94 @@ struct EngineService {
 }
 #[tonic::async_trait]
 impl Engine for EngineService {
+    async fn get_tasks(
+        &self,
+        request: tonic::Request<proto::TaskPageRequest>,
+    ) -> std::result::Result<tonic::Response<proto::TaskPage>, tonic::Status> {
+        let mut api = self.EngineAPI.write().await;
+        let challenge = get_auth(&request);
+        let uid = get_uid(&request);
+        let db = api.db.clone();
+        if !Events::CheckAuth(&mut api, uid, challenge, db) {
+            //TODO: change to AdminSpecific Auth
+            info!("GetTask denied due to Invalid Auth");
+            return Err(Status::permission_denied("Invalid authentication"));
+        };
path: src/bin/server.rs
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: @IGN-Styly You're technically correct that using a u32 does limit the maximum page size to 2^32-1 (approximately 4.3 billion). However, from a practical perspective, allowing such a large number could still lead to performance issues when retrieving large datasets.

It's generally considered a best practice to implement a reasonable business logic limit (like 100 or 1000 items per page) to:

1. Protect server resources from excessive load
2. Prevent inefficient queries that could time out
3. Ensure consistent response times for all clients
4. Defend against potential DoS attacks from malicious requests

While the u32 data type provides a technical ceiling, adding an explicit, reasonable maximum would better protect your service as it scales.

---

<details>
<summary>✏️ Learnings added</summary>

```
Learnt from: IGN-Styly
PR: GrandEngineering/engine#25
File: src/bin/server.rs:43-47
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T20:31:27.639Z
Learning: The pagination implementation in the Engine service uses u32 for page size, but adding a reasonable business logic limit (like MAX_PAGE_SIZE = 100) is recommended to prevent performance issues with extremely large page requests.
```

> Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure [review instructions](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/review-instructions). You can manage existing learnings in the [app](https://app.coderabbit.ai/learnings).

</details>




<!-- <agentComponentType>chat-answer</agentComponentType> -->

<!-- <rawResChunk><answer>@IGN-Styly You're technically correct that using a u32 does limit the maximum page size to 2^32-1 (approximately 4.3 billion). However, from a practical perspective, allowing such a large number could still lead to performance issues when retrieving large datasets.

It's generally considered a best practice to implement a reasonable business logic limit (like 100 or 1000 items per page) to:

1. Protect server resources from excessive load
2. Prevent inefficient queries that could time out
3. Ensure consistent response times for all clients
4. Defend against potential DoS attacks from malicious requests

While the u32 data type provides a technical ceiling, adding an explicit, reasonable maximum would better protect your service as it scales.

---

<details>
<summary>✏️ Learnings added</summary>

```
Learnt from: IGN-Styly
PR: GrandEngineering/engine#25
File: src/bin/server.rs:43-47
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T20:31:27.639Z
Learning: The pagination implementation in the Engine service uses u32 for page size, but adding a reasonable business logic limit (like MAX_PAGE_SIZE = 100) is recommended to prevent performance issues with extremely large page requests.
```

> Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure [review instructions](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/review-instructions). You can manage existing learnings in the [app](https://app.coderabbit.ai/learnings).

</details>

</answer></rawResChunk> -->

<!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
created_at: 2025-05-06T20:31:28Z
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR

PR comments:
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
created_at: 2025-05-05T20:17:37Z
body: <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
> [!TIP]
> For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.



<!-- <agentComponentType>chat-answer</agentComponentType> -->

<!-- <rawResChunk><answer><details>
<summary>🧩 Analysis chain</summary>

🏁 Script executed:
```
#!/bin/bash
# Get an overview of the repository structure
find . -type f -name "*.json" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.java" -o -name "*.kt" -o -name "*.swift" | sort

# Look for package.json or similar configuration files to understand the tech stack
find . -name "package.json" -o -name "go.mod" -o -name "pom.xml" -o -name "build.gradle" -o -name "requirements.txt" | xargs cat 2>/dev/null

# Search for existing pagination implementations
grep -r "pagination\|paginate\|paging" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts" --include="*.jsx" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.py" --include="*.go" --include="*.java" --include="*.kt" --include="*.swift" .

# Check for APIs or endpoints that might use pagination
grep -r "api\|endpoint\|route" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts" --include="*.jsx" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.py" --include="*.go" --include="*.java" --include="*.kt" --include="*.swift" .
```

Length of output: 708

---

🏁 Script executed:
```
#!/bin/bash
# List all files in the repository to understand its structure
ls -la

# Look for README or documentation files
find . -name "README*" -o -name "*.md" -o -name "documentation*" -o -name "docs*"

# Check what branches exist
git branch -a

# Check recent commits to understand context
git log -n 5 --oneline

# Look at recent PR description which might have context
gh pr view 25 --json title,body,baseRefName,headRefName
```

Length of output: 1054

---

🏁 Script executed:
```
#!/bin/bash
# Examine the Rust source structure
find ./src -type f -name "*.rs" | sort

# Look for API endpoints or server setups in Rust files
grep -r "server\|service\|endpoint\|route\|handler" --include="*.rs" ./src

# Check for database connections or ORM usage
grep -r "database\|connection\|query\|db\|sql\|mongo\|postgres\|mysql" --include="*.rs" ./src

# Look at protocol buffer definitions
find ./proto -type f -name "*.proto" | xargs cat 2>/dev/null

# Check for pagination-related commits in the current PR branch
git log --grep="pagination" --oneline
```

Length of output: 3137

---



</details>

@IGN-Styly I notice your project is a Rust-based gRPC service with Protocol Buffers. Looking at your proto file, I can see you've already defined some pagination structures (TaskPageRequest and TaskPage) using an offset-based approach. Here are recommendations for pagination types:

## Pagination Types for Your gRPC API

### 1. Offset-Based Pagination (Your Current Approach)
```protobuf
message TaskPageRequest {
  string namespace = 1;
  string task = 2;
  uint64 page = 3;
  uint32 pageSize = 4;
}
```

**Pros:**
- Simple to implement and understand
- Supports jumping to specific pages
- Good for UIs that show page numbers
- Works well for relatively small datasets

**Cons:**
- Less efficient with large datasets (database must skip N records)
- Inconsistent results if items are added/deleted between requests

### 2. Cursor-Based (Keyset) Pagination
```protobuf
// Recommended alternative
message TaskPageRequest {
  string namespace = 1;
  string task = 2;
  string cursor = 3;  // ID of the last item from previous page
  uint32 limit = 4;   // Number of items to fetch
}
```

**Pros:**
- More efficient for large datasets
- Consistent results even when data changes
- Better performance on indexed fields
- Scales well with growing datasets

**Cons:**
- More complex to implement
- Typically only supports forward/backward navigation, not random access

### 3. Time-Based Pagination
Useful if your tasks have timestamps:

```protobuf
message TaskPageRequest {
  string namespace = 1;
  string task = 2;
  uint64 timestamp = 3;  // Get tasks after this timestamp
  uint32 limit = 4;
}
```

## Recommendation for Your Project

Based on your gRPC API and task-oriented architecture, I recommend:

1. **For small to medium datasets** (thousands of tasks): Your current offset-based pagination is fine.

2. **For larger datasets or high performance needs**: Consider switching to cursor-based pagination, using the task ID or creation timestamp as the cursor.

Implementation example in Rust:

```rust
async fn get_tasks(&self, request: Request<TaskPageRequest>) -> Result<Response<TaskPage>, Status> {
    let req = request.into_inner();
    let limit = req.page_size.min(100) as usize; // Cap at 100 items per page
    
    // If using cursor-based pagination:
    // let cursor = req.cursor;
    // let tasks = db.query_tasks_after_id(req.namespace, req.task, cursor, limit).await?;
    
    // Current offset-based implementation:
    let offset = (req.page as usize) * limit;
    let tasks = db.query_tasks_with_offset(req.namespace, req.task, offset, limit).await?;
    
    Ok(Response::new(TaskPage {
        namespace: req.namespace,
        task: req.task,
        page: req.page,
        page_size: req.page_size,
        tasks,
    }))
}
```

Would you like more implementation details for any specific pagination approach?</answer></rawResChunk> -->
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
created_at: 2025-05-06T18:26:50Z
body: <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->

## Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new gRPC method `GetTasks` to the `engine` service, enabling paginated retrieval of tasks filtered by their state (`QUEUED`, `PROCESSING`, or `SOLVED`). The protocol buffer definitions are updated to support task states and filtering. The server implementation now handles authentication and responds with filtered, paginated task lists.

## Changes

| File(s)                      | Change Summary                                                                                                                           |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| proto/engine.proto           | Enabled the `GetTasks` RPC in the `engine` service. Added `TaskState` enum. Extended `TaskPageRequest` and `TaskPage` with a `state` field. Adjusted field numbers for `tasks` in `TaskPage`. |
| src/bin/server.rs            | Implemented the `get_tasks` async gRPC method in the `EngineService` trait, including authentication, task filtering by state, and pagination logic. Added necessary imports. |

## Sequence Diagram(s)

```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant EngineService
    participant AuthModule
    participant TaskStorage

    Client->>EngineService: GetTasks(TaskPageRequest)
    EngineService->>AuthModule: CheckAuth(request)
    AuthModule-->>EngineService: AuthResult
    alt Auth Success
        EngineService->>TaskStorage: Retrieve tasks by state (QUEUED/PROCESSING/SOLVED)
        TaskStorage-->>EngineService: Task list
        EngineService->>EngineService: Paginate, map, construct TaskPage
        EngineService-->>Client: TaskPage response
    else Auth Failure
        EngineService-->>Client: PermissionDenied error
    end
```

## Poem

> In the warren where tasks reside,  
> Now rabbits can peek inside.  
> With states—Queued, Processing, Solved—  
> Their mysteries are now resolved!  
> Pages of tasks, sorted with care,  
> All thanks to new code we share.  
> 🐇✨

<!-- walkthrough_end -->
<!-- internal state start -->


<!-- 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 -->

<!-- internal state end -->
<!-- finishing_touch_checkbox_start -->

<details open="true">
<summary>✨ Finishing Touches</summary>

- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "7962f53c-55bc-4827-bfbf-6a18da830691"} --> 📝 Generate Docstrings

</details>

<!-- finishing_touch_checkbox_end -->
<!-- tips_start -->

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

<details>
<summary>❤️ Share</summary>

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai)
- [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai)
- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai)
- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🪧 Tips</summary>

### Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai?utm_source=oss&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=GrandEngineering/engine&utm_content=25):

- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.`
  - `Generate unit testing code for this file.`
  - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.`
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.`
  -	`@coderabbitai modularize this function.`
- PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.`
  - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.`
  - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.`
  - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.`

### Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our [support page](https://www.coderabbit.ai/contact-us/support) for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

- `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR.
- `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews.
- `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
- `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
- `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR.
- `@coderabbitai generate docstrings` to [generate docstrings](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/docstrings) for this PR.
- `@coderabbitai generate sequence diagram` to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
- `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
- `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
- `@coderabbitai help` to get help.

### Other keywords and placeholders

- Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
- Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
- Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository.
- Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json`

### Documentation and Community

- Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

</details>

<!-- tips_end -->
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR
user: login: IGN-Styly
created_at: 2025-05-06T20:26:57Z
body: @coderabbitai review
author_association: MEMBER
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
created_at: 2025-05-06T20:27:02Z
body: <!-- This is an auto-generated reply by CodeRabbit -->
<details>
<summary>✅ Actions performed</summary>

Review triggered.

> Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

</details>
author_association: CONTRIBUTOR