Repository: drevops/behat-steps
Pull request #403: [#402] Fixed path trait failing on `<front>`.
Author: login: AlexSkrypnyk
Created: 2025-05-16T23:13:51Z | Merged: 2025-05-16T23:45:33Z

closes #402

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Bug Fixes**
  - Improved handling of the root path ("/") and "<front>" so they are treated as equivalent in path assertions.
  - Updated error messages to display the original input path for clearer feedback.

- **Tests**
  - Enhanced and expanded test coverage for path assertions, including new scenarios for both matching and non-matching cases with "/", "<front>", and related edge cases.

- **Documentation**
  - Updated examples to include the root path ("/") as a valid option for path assertion steps.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

Linked issue #402: pathAssertCurrent does not correctly handle `<front>`

Diff:
diff --git a/STEPS.md b/STEPS.md
index d9e5c7b5..39ecd69c 100644
--- a/STEPS.md
+++ b/STEPS.md
@@ -1040,6 +1040,7 @@ Assert that the current page is a specified path
 
 ```gherkin
 Then the path should be "/about-us"
+Then the path should be "/"
 Then the path should be "<front>"
 
 ```
@@ -1055,6 +1056,7 @@ Assert that the current page is not a specified path
 
 ```gherkin
 Then the path should not be "/about-us"
+Then the path should not be "/"
 Then the path should not be "<front>"
 
 ```
diff --git a/src/PathTrait.php b/src/PathTrait.php
index 8dfc9b92..a8e5efe4 100644
--- a/src/PathTrait.php
+++ b/src/PathTrait.php
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ trait PathTrait {
    *
    * @code
    * Then the path should be "/about-us"
+   * Then the path should be "/"
    * Then the path should be "<front>"
    * @endcode
    *
@@ -37,9 +38,10 @@ public function pathAssertCurrent(string $path): void {
       throw new \Exception('Current path is not a valid URL');
     }
 
-    $current_path = $current_path === '' ? '<front>' : $current_path;
+    $normalized_current_path = ($current_path === '' || $current_path === '/') ? '<front>' : $current_path;
+    $normalized_path = ($path === '/' || $path === '<front>') ? '<front>' : $path;
 
-    if (ltrim((string) $current_path, '/') !== ltrim($path, '/')) {
+    if (ltrim((string) $normalized_current_path, '/') !== ltrim($normalized_path, '/')) {
       throw new \Exception(sprintf('Current path is "%s", but expected is "%s"', $current_path, $path));
     }
   }
@@ -51,6 +53,7 @@ public function pathAssertCurrent(string $path): void {
    *
    * @code
    * Then the path should not be "/about-us"
+   * Then the path should not be "/"
    * Then the path should not be "<front>"
    * @endcode
    *
@@ -69,10 +72,11 @@ public function pathAssertNotCurrent(string $path): bool {
       throw new \Exception('Current path is not a valid URL');
     }
 
-    $current_path = $current_path === '/' ? '<front>' : $current_path;
+    $normalized_current_path = ($current_path === '' || $current_path === '/') ? '<front>' : $current_path;
+    $normalized_path = ($path === '/' || $path === '<front>') ? '<front>' : $path;
 
-    if (ltrim((string) $current_path, '/') === ltrim($path, '/')) {
-      throw new \Exception(sprintf('Current path should not be "%s"', $current_path));
+    if (ltrim((string) $normalized_current_path, '/') === ltrim($normalized_path, '/')) {
+      throw new \Exception(sprintf('Current path should not be "%s"', $path));
     }
 
     return TRUE;
diff --git a/tests/behat/features/path.feature b/tests/behat/features/path.feature
index 718f7300..53cb8687 100644
--- a/tests/behat/features/path.feature
+++ b/tests/behat/features/path.feature
@@ -4,31 +4,32 @@ Feature: Check that PathTrait works
   So that I can verify proper URL paths in my application
 
   @api
-  Scenario: User is at the path without prefixed slash.
+  Scenario Outline: Assert that the path is the same as the given path
     Given I am an anonymous user
-    When I go to "user/login"
-    Then the path should be "user/login"
+    When I go to "<src>"
+    Then the path should be "<dst>"
+    Examples:
+      | src         | dst         |
+      | /           | /           |
+      | /           | <front>     |
+      | <front>     | /           |
+      | <front>     | <front>     |
+      | /user/login | /user/login |
+      | user/login  | user/login  |
 
   @api
-  Scenario: User is at the path with prefixed slash
+  Scenario Outline: Assert that the path is not the same as the given path
     Given I am an anonymous user
-    When I go to "/user/login"
-    Then the path should be "/user/login"
-
-  @api
-  Scenario: User is at the '<front>' path.
-    Given I am an anonymous user
-    When I go to "/"
-    Then the path should be "/"
-
-  @api
-  Scenario: Current page is not specified path.
-    Given I am an anonymous user
-    When I go to "/user/login"
-    Then the path should be "/user/login"
-
-    When I go to "/"
-    Then the path should not be "/user/login"
+    When I go to "<src>"
+    Then the path should not be "<dst>"
+    Examples:
+      | src     | dst     |
+      | /       | /user   |
+      | /user   | /       |
+      | user    | /       |
+      | <front> | /user   |
+      | /user   | <front> |
+      | user    | <front> |
 
   @trait:PathTrait
   Scenario: Assert that negative assertion for "Then the path should be :path" fails
@@ -45,6 +46,36 @@ Feature: Check that PathTrait works
       Current path is "/user/login", but expected is "/nonexisting"
       """
 
+  @trait:PathTrait
+  Scenario: Assert that negative assertion for "Then the path should be :path" fails for "<front>"
+    Given some behat configuration
+    And scenario steps:
+      """
+      Given I am an anonymous user
+      When I go to "/user/login"
+      Then the path should be "<front>"
+      """
+    When I run "behat --no-colors"
+    Then it should fail with an error:
+      """
+      Current path is "/user/login", but expected is "<front>"
+      """
+
+  @trait:PathTrait
+  Scenario: Assert that negative assertion for "Then the path should be :path" fails for "/"
+    Given some behat configuration
+    And scenario steps:
+      """
+      Given I am an anonymous user
+      When I go to "/user/login"
+      Then the path should be "/"
+      """
+    When I run "behat --no-colors"
+    Then it should fail with an error:
+      """
+      Current path is "/user/login", but expected is "/"
+      """
+
   @trait:PathTrait
   Scenario: Assert that negative assertion for "Then the path should not be :path" fails
     Given some behat configuration
@@ -60,6 +91,36 @@ Feature: Check that PathTrait works
       Current path should not be "/user/login"
       """
 
+  @trait:PathTrait
+  Scenario: Assert that negative assertion for "Then the path should not be :path" fails for "/"
+    Given some behat configuration
+    And scenario steps:
+      """
+      Given I am an anonymous user
+      When I go to "/"
+      Then the path should not be "/"
+      """
+    When I run "behat --no-colors"
+    Then it should fail with an error:
+      """
+      Current path should not be "/"
+      """
+
+  @trait:PathTrait
+  Scenario: Assert that negative assertion for "Then the path should not be :path" fails for "<front>"
+    Given some behat configuration
+    And scenario steps:
+      """
+      Given I am an anonymous user
+      When I go to "/"
+      Then the path should not be "<front>"
+      """
+    When I run "behat --no-colors"
+    Then it should fail with an error:
+      """
+      Current path should not be "<front>"
+      """
+
   @api
   Scenario: Assert "When the basic authentication with the username :username and the password :password"
     Given users:


Reviews:
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: **Actionable comments posted: 2**

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
**Plan: Pro**


<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc5ed0d9036d9119539d3546fa841c56c76a0b13 and 512633f888ca2c096997775b606b46ec9961dc02.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (2)</summary>

* `src/PathTrait.php` (4 hunks)
* `tests/behat/features/path.feature` (3 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (6)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>src/PathTrait.php (2)</summary>

`47-49`: **The error message is correct and helpful.**

The error message preserves the original input path rather than the normalized one, which is user-friendly and provides clear context for debugging.

---

`84-86`: **Good error handling preserves the original path.**

The error message correctly uses the original `$path` parameter rather than the normalized path, which makes the error messages more user-friendly and consistent with how the path was specified.

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/features/path.feature (4)</summary>

`7-18`: **Great refactoring to scenario outlines.**

Converting individual test cases to a parameterized scenario outline with examples makes the tests more comprehensive and maintainable. The examples table thoroughly tests the equivalence between `/` and `<front>` with various combinations.

---

`21-32`: **Comprehensive test coverage for negative assertions.**

The negative path assertion tests cover all important combinations, ensuring that paths that shouldn't match don't match. This is essential for validating the equivalence logic between `/` and `<front>`.

---

`49-78`: **Good addition of specific failure test cases.**

These additional test cases for failure scenarios are important to verify that error messages correctly reflect the expected path in its original form, not the normalized form. This ensures that error messages are user-friendly and consistent with how paths were specified.

---

`94-123`: **Complete test coverage with negative assertion failures.**

Adding specific test cases for negative assertion failures with both `/` and `<front>` ensures comprehensive coverage of all edge cases. These tests validate that error messages display the original path as specified rather than its normalized form.

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
state: COMMENTED
author_association: NONE
submitted_at: 2025-05-16T23:15:34Z

Review comments:
diff_hunk: @@ -69,10 +75,14 @@ public function pathAssertNotCurrent(string $path): bool {
       throw new \Exception('Current path is not a valid URL');
     }
 
-    $current_path = $current_path === '/' ? '<front>' : $current_path;
+    $current_path = $current_path === '' || $current_path === '/' ? '<front>' : $current_path;
+
+    // Normalize path to treat '<front>' and '/' as equivalent.
+    $normalized_path = $path === '/' ? '<front>' : $path;
+    $normalized_path = $path === '<front>' ? '<front>' : $normalized_path;
 
path: src/PathTrait.php
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Apply the same simplification to path normalization here.**

Similar to the earlier comment, the path normalization logic can be simplified in this method as well.


Consider simplifying this code with the same pattern:

```diff
- $current_path = $current_path === '' || $current_path === '/' ? '<front>' : $current_path;
+ // Normalize current path to treat empty, '/' as '<front>'
+ $current_path = ($current_path === '' || $current_path === '/') ? '<front>' : $current_path;

- // Normalize path to treat '<front>' and '/' as equivalent.
- $normalized_path = $path === '/' ? '<front>' : $path;
- $normalized_path = $path === '<front>' ? '<front>' : $normalized_path;
+ // Normalize input path to treat '<front>' and '/' as equivalent
+ $normalized_path = ($path === '/' || $path === '<front>') ? '<front>' : $path;
```


<!-- suggestion_start -->

<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>

> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

```suggestion
    // Normalize current path to treat empty, '/' as '<front>'
    $current_path = ($current_path === '' || $current_path === '/') ? '<front>' : $current_path;

    // Normalize input path to treat '<front>' and '/' as equivalent
    $normalized_path = ($path === '/' || $path === '<front>') ? '<front>' : $path;
```

</details>

<!-- suggestion_end -->

<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>

```
In src/PathTrait.php around lines 78 to 83, the path normalization logic uses
multiple conditional assignments that can be simplified. Replace the two
separate ternary checks for $path with a single conditional expression that sets
$normalized_path to '<front>' if $path is either '/' or '<front>', otherwise
keep $path as is. This will make the code cleaner and consistent with the
earlier simplification.
```

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->

✅ Addressed in commit 2fc386d
created_at: 2025-05-16T23:15:33Z
author_association: NONE
diff_hunk: @@ -37,9 +38,13 @@ public function pathAssertCurrent(string $path): void {
       throw new \Exception('Current path is not a valid URL');
     }
 
-    $current_path = $current_path === '' ? '<front>' : $current_path;
+    $current_path = $current_path === '' || $current_path === '/' ? '<front>' : $current_path;
 
-    if (ltrim((string) $current_path, '/') !== ltrim($path, '/')) {
+    // Normalize path to treat '<front>' and '/' as equivalent.
+    $normalized_path = $path === '/' ? '<front>' : $path;
+    $normalized_path = $path === '<front>' ? '<front>' : $normalized_path;
+
path: src/PathTrait.php
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
body: _🧹 Nitpick (assertive)_

**Simplify path normalization logic.**

The current path normalization approach uses two separate conditional assignments that could be combined into a single more concise statement.


Consider simplifying the normalization logic:

```diff
- $current_path = $current_path === '' || $current_path === '/' ? '<front>' : $current_path;
+ // Normalize current path to treat empty, '/' as '<front>'
+ $current_path = ($current_path === '' || $current_path === '/') ? '<front>' : $current_path;

- // Normalize path to treat '<front>' and '/' as equivalent.
- $normalized_path = $path === '/' ? '<front>' : $path;
- $normalized_path = $path === '<front>' ? '<front>' : $normalized_path;
+ // Normalize input path to treat '<front>' and '/' as equivalent
+ $normalized_path = ($path === '/' || $path === '<front>') ? '<front>' : $path;
```


<!-- suggestion_start -->

<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>

> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

```suggestion
    // Normalize current path to treat empty, '/' as '<front>'
    $current_path = ($current_path === '' || $current_path === '/') ? '<front>' : $current_path;

    // Normalize input path to treat '<front>' and '/' as equivalent
    $normalized_path = ($path === '/' || $path === '<front>') ? '<front>' : $path;
```

</details>

<!-- suggestion_end -->

<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>

```
In src/PathTrait.php around lines 41 to 46, the path normalization logic uses
two separate conditional assignments to convert '/' and '<front>' to '<front>'.
Simplify this by combining the conditions into a single statement that assigns
'<front>' if the path is either '/' or '<front>', otherwise assigns the original
path. This will make the code more concise and easier to read.
```

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->

✅ Addressed in commit 2fc386d
created_at: 2025-05-16T23:15:34Z
author_association: NONE

PR comments:
user: login: coderabbitai[bot]
created_at: 2025-05-16T23:13:58Z
body: <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->

"""
## Walkthrough

The changes update path assertion logic in `PathTrait` to treat "/" and "<front>" as equivalent in both `pathAssertCurrent` and `pathAssertNotCurrent`. Test coverage in the Behat feature file is expanded and refactored using scenario outlines, adding explicit checks for these equivalences and improving error message accuracy. Documentation examples now include "/" alongside "<front>".

## Changes

| File(s)                                         | Change Summary                                                                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| src/PathTrait.php                               | Enhanced path normalization to treat "/" and "<front>" as equivalent in assertion methods; updated comments and error messages. |
| tests/behat/features/path.feature               | Refactored tests to use scenario outlines; added comprehensive cases for "/", "<front>", and error reporting.  |
| STEPS.md                                        | Updated documentation examples to include "/" as a valid path for assertion steps alongside "<front>".       |

## Assessment against linked issues

| Objective (Issue #)                                                      | Addressed | Explanation                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Correct handling of `<front>` in pathAssertCurrent (#402)                | ✅        | Path normalization now treats "/" and "<front>" equivalently in assertions. |

## Poem

> A path is a path, whether "/" or "<front>",  
> Now both are the same, no need to confront.  
> The tests are more thorough, the logic precise,  
> Assertion confusion? No longer a vice!  
> 🐇✨ Paths united, all bugs in flight!
"""

<!-- walkthrough_end -->


---

<details>
<summary>📜 Recent review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
**Plan: Lite**


<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2fc386d033b5c639c92fe9cc6e4736c217262b65 and 638b0fdcbf49b719b30d6a2d342f81fd676c67dd.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (3)</summary>

* `STEPS.md` (2 hunks)
* `src/PathTrait.php` (4 hunks)
* `tests/behat/features/path.feature` (3 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (8)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>STEPS.md (2)</summary>

`1043-1043`: **Documentation updated to include root path example**

Good addition to include the root path "/" in the documentation examples, which matches the functionality changes in the implementation.

---

`1059-1059`: **Documentation updated to include root path example for negative assertion**

Good addition to include the root path "/" in the negative assertion examples as well, maintaining consistency with the positive assertion documentation.

</details>
<details>
<summary>src/PathTrait.php (3)</summary>

`41-42`: **Improved path normalization with concise logic**

The path normalization logic is now more concise and readable, clearly treating both '/' and '<front>' as equivalent. This is a good improvement over the previous implementation.

---

`75-76`: **Consistent normalization in path assertion methods**

Good consistency in implementing the same normalization logic in both path assertion methods. This ensures uniform handling of paths across positive and negative assertions.

---

`22-22`: **Updated documentation examples to match implementation**

Documentation examples now properly reflect the implementation's handling of the root path, maintaining consistency between code and documentation.



Also applies to: 56-56

</details>
<details>
<summary>tests/behat/features/path.feature (3)</summary>

`7-18`: **Improved test structure with scenario outlines**

Excellent refactoring of the tests to use scenario outlines with examples. This approach is more maintainable and provides better coverage of different path combinations, including the equivalence between "/" and "<front>".

---

`49-78`: **Added comprehensive tests for failure cases with special paths**

Great addition of specific failure test cases for "<front>" and "/" paths. These tests ensure that appropriate error messages are generated when path assertions fail with these special paths.

---

`94-123`: **Complete test coverage for negative assertion failures**

Good addition of test cases for negative assertions with special paths. The comprehensive test suite now covers all edge cases for both positive and negative path assertions.

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>
<!-- internal state start -->


<!-- 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 -->

<!-- internal state end -->
<!-- tips_start -->

---



<details>
<summary>🪧 Tips</summary>

### Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai?utm_source=oss&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=drevops/behat-steps&utm_content=403):

- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  - `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.`
  - `Explain this complex logic.`
  - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.`
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  - `@coderabbitai explain this code block.`
  -	`@coderabbitai modularize this function.`
- PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.`
  - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.`
  - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.`
  - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.`

### Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our [support page](https://www.coderabbit.ai/contact-us/support) for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

- `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR.
- `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews.
- `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
- `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
- `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR.
- `@coderabbitai generate sequence diagram` to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
- `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
- `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
- `@coderabbitai help` to get help.

### Other keywords and placeholders

- Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
- Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
- Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository.
- Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json`

### Documentation and Community

- Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

</details>

<!-- tips_end -->
author_association: NONE
user: login: codecov[bot]
created_at: 2025-05-16T23:44:57Z
body: ## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/pull/403?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops) Report
Attention: Patch coverage is `85.71429%` with `1 line` in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
> Project coverage is 80.25%. Comparing base [(`fc5ed0d`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/commit/fc5ed0d9036d9119539d3546fa841c56c76a0b13?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops) to head [(`638b0fd`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/commit/638b0fdcbf49b719b30d6a2d342f81fd676c67dd?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops).
> Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

| [Files with missing lines](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/pull/403?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops) | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| [src/PathTrait.php](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/pull/403?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=src%2FPathTrait.php&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops#diff-c3JjL1BhdGhUcmFpdC5waHA=) | 85.71% | [1 Missing :warning: ](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/pull/403?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops) |

<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>


```diff
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #403      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.23%   80.25%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          29       29              
  Lines        1963     1965       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         1575     1577       +2     
  Misses        388      388              
```

</details>

[:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/drevops/behat-steps/pull/403?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops).   
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=drevops).

<details><summary> :rocket: New features to boost your workflow: </summary>

- :snowflake: [Test Analytics](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/test-analytics): Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
</details>
author_association: NONE