budecosystem/superglue_ax_b huggingface dataset:
Premise: He does not have a blind trust.
Hypothesis: Either he has a blind trust or he has a conflict of interest.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction;Negation
Premise: Everyone has a set of principles to live by.
Hypothesis: Someone has a set of principles to live by.
Label: entailment
Logic: Universal
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Someone has a set of principles to live by.
Hypothesis: Everyone has a set of principles to live by.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Universal
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Everyone has a set of principles to live by.
Hypothesis: No one has a set of principles to live by.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Universal
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: No one has a set of principles to live by.
Hypothesis: Everyone has a set of principles to live by.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Universal
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Everyone has a set of principles to live by.
Hypothesis: Susan doesn't have a set of principles to live by.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Universal
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Susan doesn't have a set of principles to live by.
Hypothesis: Everyone has a set of principles to live by.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Universal
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Susan knows how turtles reproduce.
Hypothesis: Someone knows how turtles reproduce.
Label: entailment
Logic: Existential
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Someone knows how turtles reproduce.
Hypothesis: Susan knows how turtles reproduce.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Existential
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Susan knows how turtles reproduce.
Hypothesis: No one knows how turtles reproduce.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Existential
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: No one knows how turtles reproduce.
Hypothesis: Susan knows how turtles reproduce.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Existential
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Susan knows how turtles reproduce.
Hypothesis: Cedric doesn't know how turtles reproduce.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Existential
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Cedric doesn't know how turtles reproduce.
Hypothesis: Susan knows how turtles reproduce.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Existential
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Either there is no bathroom in this house, or it is in a funny place.
Hypothesis: If there is a bathroom in this house, it is in a funny place.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction;Conditionals;Negation
Premise: If there is a bathroom in this house, it is in a funny place.
Hypothesis: Either there is no bathroom in this house, or it is in a funny place.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction;Conditionals;Negation
Premise: Either there is no bathroom in this house, or it is in a funny place.
Hypothesis: The bathroom in this house is in a funny place.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction;Conditionals;Negation
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The bathroom in this house is in a funny place.
Hypothesis: Either there is no bathroom in this house, or it is in a funny place.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction;Conditionals;Negation
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Joan believes that all speech is political speech.
Hypothesis: All speech is political speech.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: All speech is political speech.
Hypothesis: Joan believes that all speech is political speech.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Joan doubts that all speech is political speech.
Hypothesis: All speech is political speech.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: All speech is political speech.
Hypothesis: Joan doubts that all speech is political speech.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Joan knows that all speech is political speech.
Hypothesis: All speech is political speech.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: All speech is political speech.
Hypothesis: Joan knows that all speech is political speech.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Joan knows that all speech is political speech.
Hypothesis: No speech is political speech.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity;Quantifiers
Premise: No speech is political speech.
Hypothesis: Joan knows that all speech is political speech.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity;Quantifiers
Premise: Grisham hoped to win the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham won the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham won the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham hoped to win the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham hoped to win the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham hoped to win the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Jacob saw Tex sign the contract.
Hypothesis: Tex signed the contract.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Tex signed the contract.
Hypothesis: Jacob saw Tex sign the contract.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Jacob did not see Tex sign the contract.
Hypothesis: Tex signed the contract.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Tex signed the contract.
Hypothesis: Jacob did not see Tex sign the contract.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham tried to win the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham won the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham won the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham tried to win the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham tried to win the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham tried to win the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham almost won the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham won the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham won the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham almost won the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham barely won the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham won the popular vote.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham won the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham barely won the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham almost won the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Label: entailment
Logic: Negation
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham almost won the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham barely won the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Hypothesis: Grisham barely won the popular vote.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: She has three questions.
Hypothesis: She had three questions.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: She had three questions.
Hypothesis: She has three questions.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: Mary left before John entered.
Hypothesis: John entered after Mary left.
Label: entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: John entered after Mary left.
Hypothesis: Mary left before John entered.
Label: entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: Mary left before John entered.
Hypothesis: John entered before Mary left.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: John entered before Mary left.
Hypothesis: Mary left before John entered.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: Mary was leaving while John entered.
Hypothesis: John entered while Mary was leaving.
Label: entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: John entered while Mary was leaving.
Hypothesis: Mary was leaving while John entered.
Label: entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it.
Hypothesis: Pedro beats his donkey.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Pedro beats his donkey.
Hypothesis: If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it.
Hypothesis: Pedro doesn't have a donkey.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Premise: Pedro doesn't have a donkey.
Hypothesis: If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Premise: It is the clearest evidence yet that Xi plans to rule beyond the end of this second term, in 2023, taking China back to the era of one-man rule just as it steps up its role in global politics.
Hypothesis: Xi's second term ends in 2023.
Label: entailment
Premise: Xi's second term ends in 2023.
Hypothesis: It is the clearest evidence yet that Xi plans to rule beyond the end of this second term, in 2023, taking China back to the era of one-man rule just as it steps up its role in global politics.
Label: not_entailment
Premise: The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
Hypothesis: Deng Xiaoping was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Relative clauses
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Deng Xiaoping was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
Hypothesis: The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Relative clauses
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
Hypothesis: Mao was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Relative clauses
Premise: Mao was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
Hypothesis: The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Relative clauses
Premise: Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Hypothesis: Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Hypothesis: Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Hypothesis: Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Hypothesis: Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Hypothesis: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation.
Hypothesis: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Hypothesis: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Hypothesis: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Hypothesis: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Hypothesis: Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The latest fatal incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman.
Hypothesis: The latest incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Non-monotone
Predicate-argument structure: Restrictivity
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The latest incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman.
Hypothesis: The latest fatal incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman.
Label: entailment
Logic: Non-monotone
Predicate-argument structure: Restrictivity
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of an explosion in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured.
Hypothesis: Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of a blast in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of a blast in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured.
Hypothesis: Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of an explosion in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
Hypothesis: The announcement represents a slight hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: The announcement represents a slight hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
Hypothesis: The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
Hypothesis: The announcement represents a significant change in Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: The announcement represents a significant change in Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
Hypothesis: The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Hypothesis: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a train home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a train home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Hypothesis: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Hypothesis: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a plane home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a plane home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Hypothesis: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Hypothesis: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to go home by air, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to go home by air, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Hypothesis: Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe.
Hypothesis: People across the globe were not expecting Tillerson's departure.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: People across the globe were not expecting Tillerson's departure.
Hypothesis: The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe.
Hypothesis: People across the globe were prepared for Tillerson's departure.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: People across the globe were prepared for Tillerson's departure.
Hypothesis: The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer.
Hypothesis: LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer.
Hypothesis: LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer.
Hypothesis: LaBeouf knowingly had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: LaBeouf knowingly had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer.
Hypothesis: LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station.
Hypothesis: After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was arrested.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was arrested.
Hypothesis: After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station.
Hypothesis: After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was escorted home.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was escorted home.
Hypothesis: After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years.
Hypothesis: Marc Sims has been getting his hair cut once a week, for several years.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Marc Sims has been getting his hair cut once a week, for several years.
Hypothesis: Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years.
Hypothesis: Marc Sims has been cutting hair once a week, for several years.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Marc Sims has been cutting hair once a week, for several years.
Hypothesis: Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed wastewater treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents.
Hypothesis: The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed water treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed water treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents.
Hypothesis: The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed wastewater treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Hypothesis: British investigators say they have identified a nerve agent as Russian.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Relative clauses;Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: British investigators say they have identified a nerve agent as Russian.
Hypothesis: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Relative clauses;Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Hypothesis: Russians have identified a nerve agent used in a suspected chemical attack on British soil.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args;Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Russians have identified a nerve agent used in a suspected chemical attack on British soil.
Hypothesis: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args;Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last week’s attack.
Hypothesis: Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian responsibility for last week’s attack.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian responsibility for last week’s attack.
Hypothesis: Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last week’s attack.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last week’s attack.
Hypothesis: Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian ignorance of last week’s attack.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian ignorance of last week’s attack.
Hypothesis: Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last week’s attack.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Hypothesis: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Hypothesis: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Hypothesis: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to an attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Intersectivity
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to an attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Hypothesis: Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Intersectivity
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a secret CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Hypothesis: Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a CIA black site in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a CIA black site in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Hypothesis: Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a secret CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a secret CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Hypothesis: Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a clandestine CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a clandestine CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Hypothesis: Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a secret CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: She could be opposed by all the Democrats, and some Republicans may also oppose her, including Senator Rand Paul, who has called a news conference on Wednesday to discuss the nomination.
Hypothesis: She could be opposed by every Democrat, and some Republicans may also oppose her, including Senator Rand Paul, who has called a news conference on Wednesday to discuss the nomination.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: She could be opposed by every Democrat, and some Republicans may also oppose her, including Senator Rand Paul, who has called a news conference on Wednesday to discuss the nomination.
Hypothesis: She could be opposed by all the Democrats, and some Republicans may also oppose her, including Senator Rand Paul, who has called a news conference on Wednesday to discuss the nomination.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Hypothesis: Twitch has routinely given away free in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: Twitch has routinely given away free in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Hypothesis: Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Hypothesis: Twitch has routinely given away games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Redundancy
Premise: Twitch has routinely given away games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Hypothesis: Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Redundancy
Premise: Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Hypothesis: Twitch has routinely given Twitch Prime subscribers free games and in-game content in the past.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Datives
Premise: Twitch has routinely given Twitch Prime subscribers free games and in-game content in the past.
Hypothesis: Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Datives
Premise: Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Hypothesis: Twitch has rarely given Twitch Prime subscribers free games and in-game content in the past.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Datives
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Twitch has rarely given Twitch Prime subscribers free games and in-game content in the past.
Hypothesis: Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Datives
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: All five of these games will be available to Prime members until March 31.
Hypothesis: Several games will be available to Prime members until March 31.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Several games will be available to Prime members until March 31.
Hypothesis: All five of these games will be available to Prime members until March 31.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Future legislators should focus on [low taxes, limited regulation and local control] to maintain a predictable and reliable business climate, avoiding legislation that distracts from critical priorities and is viewed by many as enabling discrimination against certain groups or classes of Texans.
Hypothesis: Future legislators should focus on [low taxes, limited regulation and local control] to maintain a predictable and reliable business climate, avoiding legislation that distracts from critical priorities and is viewed by many as enabling discrimination against certain groups of Texans.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Redundancy
Premise: Future legislators should focus on [low taxes, limited regulation and local control] to maintain a predictable and reliable business climate, avoiding legislation that distracts from critical priorities and is viewed by many as enabling discrimination against certain groups of Texans.
Hypothesis: Future legislators should focus on [low taxes, limited regulation and local control] to maintain a predictable and reliable business climate, avoiding legislation that distracts from critical priorities and is viewed by many as enabling discrimination against certain groups or classes of Texans.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Redundancy
Premise: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, and for the first several months of debate, Abbott remained largely silent even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Hypothesis: Abbott remained largely silent for the first several months of debate after Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Label: entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: Abbott remained largely silent for the first several months of debate after Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Hypothesis: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, and for the first several months of debate, Abbott remained largely silent even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Label: entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, and for the first several months of debate, Abbott remained largely silent even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Hypothesis: Abbott remained largely silent for the first several months of debate before Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: Abbott remained largely silent for the first several months of debate before Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Hypothesis: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, and for the first several months of debate, Abbott remained largely silent even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, and for the first several months of debate, Abbott remained largely silent even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Hypothesis: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, and in the second month of debate, Abbott remained largely silent even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal;Intervals/Numbers
Premise: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, and in the second month of debate, Abbott remained largely silent even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Hypothesis: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick first unveiled a “bathroom bill” in January 2017, and for the first several months of debate, Abbott remained largely silent even as some cautioned that it would be bad for business.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal;Intervals/Numbers
Premise: No bathroom bill made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Hypothesis: A bathroom bill made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: A bathroom bill made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Hypothesis: No bathroom bill made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: No bathroom bill made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Hypothesis: No bills made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Downward monotone
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: No bills made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Hypothesis: No bathroom bill made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Label: entailment
Logic: Downward monotone
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: No bathroom bill made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Hypothesis: A bill made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Downward monotone
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: A bill made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Hypothesis: No bathroom bill made it to Abbott’s desk by the end of the legislative session in May.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Downward monotone
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: As with previous freebies, the games offered in this manner will be yours to keep permanently, though you'll presumably need to use the Twitch desktop app in order to grab them.
Hypothesis: As with previous freebies, the games offered in this manner will be yours to keep permanently, though you'll presumably need to use the Twitch desktop app in order to download them.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: As with previous freebies, the games offered in this manner will be yours to keep permanently, though you'll presumably need to use the Twitch desktop app in order to download them.
Hypothesis: As with previous freebies, the games offered in this manner will be yours to keep permanently, though you'll presumably need to use the Twitch desktop app in order to grab them.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: From Maine to Hawaii, thousands of students planned to stage walkouts Wednesday to protest gun violence, one month after the deadly shooting inside a high school in Parkland, Florida.
Hypothesis: From Maine to Hawaii, thousands of students planned to stage walkouts Wednesday to protest gun violence, two months after the deadly shooting inside a high school in Parkland, Florida.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: From Maine to Hawaii, thousands of students planned to stage walkouts Wednesday to protest gun violence, two months after the deadly shooting inside a high school in Parkland, Florida.
Hypothesis: From Maine to Hawaii, thousands of students planned to stage walkouts Wednesday to protest gun violence, one month after the deadly shooting inside a high school in Parkland, Florida.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: A Tennessee House subcommittee has approved legislation to offer in-state tuition to public college students whose parents brought or kept them in the country illegally.
Hypothesis: A Tennessee House subcommittee has approved legislation to offer in-state tuition to public college students whose parents kept them in the country illegally.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: A Tennessee House subcommittee has approved legislation to offer in-state tuition to public college students whose parents kept them in the country illegally.
Hypothesis: A Tennessee House subcommittee has approved legislation to offer in-state tuition to public college students whose parents brought or kept them in the country illegally.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Missouri lawmakers are considering a government boycott of companies that boycott Israel.
Hypothesis: Missouri lawmakers are considering a boycott of companies that boycott Israel.
Label: entailment
Logic: Upward monotone
Predicate-argument structure: Intersectivity
Premise: Missouri lawmakers are considering a boycott of companies that boycott Israel.
Hypothesis: Missouri lawmakers are considering a government boycott of companies that boycott Israel.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Upward monotone
Predicate-argument structure: Intersectivity
Premise: He said the United States intended to use the fake attack as a pretext to bomb the government quarter in nearby Damascus where he said Russian military advisers, Russian military police and Russian ceasefire monitors were based.
Hypothesis: He said the United States intended to bomb the government quarter in nearby Damascus where he said Russian military advisers, Russian military police and Russian ceasefire monitors were based.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: He said the United States intended to bomb the government quarter in nearby Damascus where he said Russian military advisers, Russian military police and Russian ceasefire monitors were based.
Hypothesis: He said the United States intended to use the fake attack as a pretext to bomb the government quarter in nearby Damascus where he said Russian military advisers, Russian military police and Russian ceasefire monitors were based.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The matter is so sensitive that they agreed to talk only on condition of anonymity.
Hypothesis: It is so sensitive that they agreed to talk about the matter only on condition of anonymity.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Premise: It is so sensitive that they agreed to talk about the matter only on condition of anonymity.
Hypothesis: The matter is so sensitive that they agreed to talk only on condition of anonymity.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Premise: The matter is so sensitive that they agreed to talk only on condition of anonymity.
Hypothesis: The matter is so sensitive that they agreed to talk about something else on condition of anonymity.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Premise: The matter is so sensitive that they agreed to talk about something else on condition of anonymity.
Hypothesis: The matter is so sensitive that they agreed to talk only on condition of anonymity.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Premise: Russia’s ruling system, while projecting an image of unity, is divided along many lines — between security hawks and economic liberals, between people with personal vendettas, and between competing business interests.
Hypothesis: Russia’s ruling projects an image of unity, but is divided along many lines — between security hawks and economic liberals, between people with personal vendettas, and between competing business interests.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Premise: Russia’s ruling projects an image of unity, but is divided along many lines — between security hawks and economic liberals, between people with personal vendettas, and between competing business interests.
Hypothesis: Russia’s ruling system, while projecting an image of unity, is divided along many lines — between security hawks and economic liberals, between people with personal vendettas, and between competing business interests.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args