budecosystem/superglue_ax_b huggingface dataset:
Premise: Putin is so entrenched within Russia’s ruling system that many of its members can imagine no other leader.
Hypothesis: Putin is so entrenched within Russia’s ruling system that many of its members can imagine no other leader than Putin.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Premise: Putin is so entrenched within Russia’s ruling system that many of its members can imagine no other leader than Putin.
Hypothesis: Putin is so entrenched within Russia’s ruling system that many of its members can imagine no other leader.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Premise: Putin is so entrenched within Russia’s ruling system that many of its members can imagine no other leader.
Hypothesis: Putin is so entrenched within Russia’s ruling system that many of its members can imagine no other leader than themselves.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Premise: Putin is so entrenched within Russia’s ruling system that many of its members can imagine no other leader than themselves.
Hypothesis: Putin is so entrenched within Russia’s ruling system that many of its members can imagine no other leader.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Premise: Microsoft has said a class action isn’t warranted because there is no common cause for the employees’ complaints and plaintiffs have not identified systemic gender discrimination.
Hypothesis: Microsoft has said a class action is warranted because there is a common cause for the employees’ complaints and plaintiffs have not identified systemic gender discrimination.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Double negation
Premise: Microsoft has said a class action is warranted because there is a common cause for the employees’ complaints and plaintiffs have not identified systemic gender discrimination.
Hypothesis: Microsoft has said a class action isn’t warranted because there is no common cause for the employees’ complaints and plaintiffs have not identified systemic gender discrimination.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Double negation
Premise: Microsoft has said a class action isn’t warranted because there is no common cause for the employees’ complaints and plaintiffs have not identified systemic gender discrimination.
Hypothesis: Microsoft has said a class action is warranted because there isn't a common cause for the employees’ complaints and plaintiffs have not identified systemic gender discrimination.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Premise: Microsoft has said a class action is warranted because there isn't a common cause for the employees’ complaints and plaintiffs have not identified systemic gender discrimination.
Hypothesis: Microsoft has said a class action isn’t warranted because there is no common cause for the employees’ complaints and plaintiffs have not identified systemic gender discrimination.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Premise: Three women alleged they were sexually assaulted or raped by male colleagues during that time.
Hypothesis: Three women alleged they were sexually assaulted by male colleagues during that time.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Three women alleged they were sexually assaulted by male colleagues during that time.
Hypothesis: Three women alleged they were sexually assaulted or raped by male colleagues during that time.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Three women alleged they were sexually assaulted or raped by male colleagues during that time.
Hypothesis: Three women alleged they were raped by male colleagues during that time.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Three women alleged they were raped by male colleagues during that time.
Hypothesis: Three women alleged they were sexually assaulted or raped by male colleagues during that time.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Microsoft has said that corrective action might be taken even if no policy violation was found, and that the person who filed the complaint might not be informed.
Hypothesis: Microsoft has said that corrective action might not be taken even if a policy violation was found, and that the person who filed the complaint might not be informed.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation;Conditionals
Premise: Microsoft has said that corrective action might not be taken even if a policy violation was found, and that the person who filed the complaint might not be informed.
Hypothesis: Microsoft has said that corrective action might be taken even if no policy violation was found, and that the person who filed the complaint might not be informed.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation;Conditionals
Premise: The longer he stays in power, the harder it will be to exit.
Hypothesis: If he stays in power longer,  it will be harder for him to exit.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Premise: If he stays in power longer,  it will be harder for him to exit.
Hypothesis: The longer he stays in power, the harder it will be to exit.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Premise: The longer he stays in power, the harder it will be to exit.
Hypothesis: If he stays in power longer,  it will be harder to exit.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Premise: If he stays in power longer,  it will be harder to exit.
Hypothesis: The longer he stays in power, the harder it will be to exit.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Premise: The longer he stays in power, the harder it will be to exit.
Hypothesis: The shorter he stays in power, the easier it will be to exit.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: The shorter he stays in power, the easier it will be to exit.
Hypothesis: The longer he stays in power, the harder it will be to exit.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Our deepest sympathies are with all those affected by this accident.
Hypothesis: Our deepest sympathies are with a victim who was affected by this accident.
Label: entailment
Logic: Universal
Premise: Our deepest sympathies are with a victim who was affected by this accident.
Hypothesis: Our deepest sympathies are with all those affected by this accident.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Universal
Premise: There will be a comprehensive investigation involving authorities.
Hypothesis: The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration will carry out a comprehensive investigation.
Label: entailment
Logic: Existential
Premise: The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration will carry out a comprehensive investigation.
Hypothesis: There will be a comprehensive investigation involving authorities.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Existential
Premise: The crown prince's mother wouldn't be the first Saudi royal whose movements were restricted since June 2017.
Hypothesis: The crown prince's mother wouldn't be the first royal whose movements were restricted since June 2017.
Label: entailment
Logic: Non-monotone
Premise: The crown prince's mother wouldn't be the first royal whose movements were restricted since June 2017.
Hypothesis: The crown prince's mother wouldn't be the first Saudi royal whose movements were restricted since June 2017.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Non-monotone
Premise: The Saudi Embassy in Washington denied to NBC the claims that the princess is separated from her husband or under house arrest.
Hypothesis: Representatives of the Saudi government denied to NBC the claims that the princess is separated from her husband or under house arrest.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Representatives of the Saudi government denied to NBC the claims that the princess is separated from her husband or under house arrest.
Hypothesis: The Saudi Embassy in Washington denied to NBC the claims that the princess is separated from her husband or under house arrest.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The Saudi Embassy in Washington denied to NBC the claims that the princess is separated from her husband or under house arrest.
Hypothesis: American ambassadors to Riyadh denied to NBC the claims that the princess is separated from her husband or under house arrest.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: American ambassadors to Riyadh denied to NBC the claims that the princess is separated from her husband or under house arrest.
Hypothesis: The Saudi Embassy in Washington denied to NBC the claims that the princess is separated from her husband or under house arrest.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: From a quick Google search, Bitcoin Cash was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and it's supposed to be faster and more sustainable.
Hypothesis: From a quick Google search, it was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and it's supposed to be faster and more sustainable than Bitcoin.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits;Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: From a quick Google search, it was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and it's supposed to be faster and more sustainable than Bitcoin.
Hypothesis: From a quick Google search, Bitcoin Cash was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and it's supposed to be faster and more sustainable.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits;Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: From a quick Google search, Bitcoin Cash was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and it's supposed to be faster and more sustainable.
Hypothesis: From a quick Google search, Bitcoin Cash was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and it's supposed to be faster and more sustainable than Bitcoin Cash.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits;Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: From a quick Google search, Bitcoin Cash was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and it's supposed to be faster and more sustainable than Bitcoin Cash.
Hypothesis: From a quick Google search, Bitcoin Cash was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and it's supposed to be faster and more sustainable.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits;Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: From a quick Google search, Bitcoin Cash was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and it's supposed to be faster and more sustainable.
Hypothesis: From a quick Google search, Bitcoin Cash was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and Bitcoin's supposed to be faster and more sustainable.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: From a quick Google search, Bitcoin Cash was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and Bitcoin's supposed to be faster and more sustainable.
Hypothesis: From a quick Google search, Bitcoin Cash was created as a hard fork of Bitcoin and it's supposed to be faster and more sustainable.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Such a cute furry ball of personality, her last days were painful for her and us but at least I had the time to make my peace and say goodbye while she was still there.
Hypothesis: Such a cute furry ball of personality, her last nights were painful for her and us but at least I had the time to make my peace and say goodbye while she was still there.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Such a cute furry ball of personality, her last nights were painful for her and us but at least I had the time to make my peace and say goodbye while she was still there.
Hypothesis: Such a cute furry ball of personality, her last days were painful for her and us but at least I had the time to make my peace and say goodbye while she was still there.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: He abandoned the radical teachings of the Nation of Islam in favor of mainstream Islam after a pilgrimage to Mecca where he witnessed Muslims of all races coming together in solidarity.
Hypothesis: He abandoned the radical teachings of the Nation of Islam in favor of mainstream Islam until a pilgrimage to Mecca where he witnessed Muslims of all races coming together in solidarity.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: He abandoned the radical teachings of the Nation of Islam in favor of mainstream Islam until a pilgrimage to Mecca where he witnessed Muslims of all races coming together in solidarity.
Hypothesis: He abandoned the radical teachings of the Nation of Islam in favor of mainstream Islam after a pilgrimage to Mecca where he witnessed Muslims of all races coming together in solidarity.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: He abandoned the radical teachings of the Nation of Islam in favor of mainstream Islam after a pilgrimage to Mecca where he witnessed Muslims of all races coming together in solidarity.
Hypothesis: He abandoned the radical teachings of the Nation of Islam in favor of mainstream Islam due in part to a pilgrimage to Mecca where he witnessed Muslims of all races coming together in solidarity.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: He abandoned the radical teachings of the Nation of Islam in favor of mainstream Islam due in part to a pilgrimage to Mecca where he witnessed Muslims of all races coming together in solidarity.
Hypothesis: He abandoned the radical teachings of the Nation of Islam in favor of mainstream Islam after a pilgrimage to Mecca where he witnessed Muslims of all races coming together in solidarity.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Every lunch hour I make it my goal to sift through one research paper.
Hypothesis: Every day around noon, I make it my goal to sift through one research paper.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Every day around noon, I make it my goal to sift through one research paper.
Hypothesis: Every lunch hour I make it my goal to sift through one research paper.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Every lunch hour I make it my goal to sift through one research paper.
Hypothesis: Today at lunch, I had the goal of sifting through one research paper.
Label: entailment
Logic: Universal
Premise: Today at lunch, I had the goal of sifting through one research paper.
Hypothesis: Every lunch hour I make it my goal to sift through one research paper.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Universal
Premise: Every lunch hour I make it my goal to sift through one research paper.
Hypothesis: Every night, I make it my goal to sift through one research paper.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Every night, I make it my goal to sift through one research paper.
Hypothesis: Every lunch hour I make it my goal to sift through one research paper.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: David Tennant's episodes were definitely the scariest (and best) in years.
Hypothesis: David Tennant's episodes were definitely the scariest (and best) ever.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: David Tennant's episodes were definitely the scariest (and best) ever.
Hypothesis: David Tennant's episodes were definitely the scariest (and best) in years.
Label: entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: David Tennant is the best Doctor in the series.
Hypothesis: David Tennant is the best Doctor in the Doctor Who series.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Lexical semantics: Redundancy
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: David Tennant is the best Doctor in the Doctor Who series.
Hypothesis: David Tennant is the best Doctor in the series.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Ellipsis/Implicits
Lexical semantics: Redundancy
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: David Tennant is the best Doctor in the series.
Hypothesis: David Tennant is the best Doctor in the House, M.D. series.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: David Tennant is the best Doctor in the House, M.D. series.
Hypothesis: David Tennant is the best Doctor in the series.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Fun fact, that guy in the Ireland jacket is on SNL now.
Hypothesis: Fun fact, that guy in the Ireland jacket is on Saturday Night Live now.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Fun fact, that guy in the Ireland jacket is on Saturday Night Live now.
Hypothesis: Fun fact, that guy in the Ireland jacket is on SNL now.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Last time I visited was nearly 6 months ago and I am still finding husky fur on my socks.
Hypothesis: Last time I visited my friend was nearly 6 months ago and I am still finding husky fur on my socks.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Non-monotone
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Premise: Last time I visited my friend was nearly 6 months ago and I am still finding husky fur on my socks.
Hypothesis: Last time I visited was nearly 6 months ago and I am still finding husky fur on my socks.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Non-monotone
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Premise: Last time I visited was nearly 6 months ago and I am still finding husky fur on my socks.
Hypothesis: Last time I visited was more than 6 months ago and I am still finding husky fur on my socks.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: Last time I visited was more than 6 months ago and I am still finding husky fur on my socks.
Hypothesis: Last time I visited was nearly 6 months ago and I am still finding husky fur on my socks.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Temporal
Premise: That perspective makes it look gigantic.
Hypothesis: That perspective makes it seem gigantic.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: That perspective makes it seem gigantic.
Hypothesis: That perspective makes it look gigantic.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: That perspective makes it look gigantic.
Hypothesis: That perspective makes it look miniscule.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: That perspective makes it look miniscule.
Hypothesis: That perspective makes it look gigantic.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: That perspective makes it look gigantic.
Hypothesis: That perspective makes it sound gigantic.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: That perspective makes it sound gigantic.
Hypothesis: That perspective makes it look gigantic.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Unshielded radiation from a nuclear core could kill you in a matter of hours.
Hypothesis: Unshielded radiation from a nuclear core will kill you in a matter of hours.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment;Factivity
Premise: Unshielded radiation from a nuclear core will kill you in a matter of hours.
Hypothesis: Unshielded radiation from a nuclear core could kill you in a matter of hours.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment;Factivity
Premise: I think the unrealistic part is him surviving the blunt force of the blast.
Hypothesis: He survived the blunt force of the blast.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: He survived the blunt force of the blast.
Hypothesis: I think the unrealistic part is him surviving the blunt force of the blast.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: The theory that they are products of the radiation from the bomb is genius.
Hypothesis: They are products of the radiation from the bomb.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: They are products of the radiation from the bomb.
Hypothesis: The theory that they are products of the radiation from the bomb is genius.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: The theory that they are products of the radiation from the bomb is correct.
Hypothesis: They are products of the radiation from the bomb.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: They are products of the radiation from the bomb.
Hypothesis: The theory that they are products of the radiation from the bomb is correct.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Factivity
Premise: Every human alive today is a member of the homo sapiens species, but there have been plenty of other species of humans over the last ~2.5 million years that could be called "humans".
Hypothesis: The last ~2.5 million years could be called "humans".
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Relative clauses
Premise: The last ~2.5 million years could be called "humans".
Hypothesis: Every human alive today is a member of the homo sapiens species, but there have been plenty of other species of humans over the last ~2.5 million years that could be called "humans".
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Relative clauses
Premise: Every human alive today is a member of the homo sapiens species, but there have been plenty of other species of humans over the last ~2.5 million years that could be called "humans".
Hypothesis: Plenty of other species could be called "humans".
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Relative clauses
Premise: Plenty of other species could be called "humans".
Hypothesis: Every human alive today is a member of the homo sapiens species, but there have been plenty of other species of humans over the last ~2.5 million years that could be called "humans".
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Relative clauses
Premise: Every human alive today is a member of the homo sapiens species, but there have been plenty of other species of humans over the last ~2.5 million years that could be called "humans".
Hypothesis: Every human alive today is a member of other species of humans over the last ~2.5 million years that could be called "humans".
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Every human alive today is a member of other species of humans over the last ~2.5 million years that could be called "humans".
Hypothesis: Every human alive today is a member of the homo sapiens species, but there have been plenty of other species of humans over the last ~2.5 million years that could be called "humans".
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, not out of affection to her, but rather the fondness of all the memories surrounding that time period.
Hypothesis: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, not out of the fondness of all the memories surrounding that time period.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, not out of the fondness of all the memories surrounding that time period.
Hypothesis: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, not out of affection to her, but rather the fondness of all the memories surrounding that time period.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, not out of affection to her, but rather the fondness of all the memories surrounding that time period.
Hypothesis: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, out of affection to her.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, out of affection to her.
Hypothesis: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, not out of affection to her, but rather the fondness of all the memories surrounding that time period.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, not out of affection to her, but rather the fondness of all the memories surrounding that time period.
Hypothesis: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, out of the fondness of all the memories surrounding the time period.
Label: entailment
Logic: Negation
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope;Prepositional phrases
Premise: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, out of the fondness of all the memories surrounding the time period.
Hypothesis: I couldn’t bring myself to throw it away, not out of affection to her, but rather the fondness of all the memories surrounding that time period.
Label: entailment
Logic: Negation
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope;Prepositional phrases
Premise: You know that some life changing actions must be taken when grandma reacts with the sad emoji.
Hypothesis: You know that some actions must be taken when grandma reacts with the sad emoji.
Label: entailment
Logic: Upward monotone
Predicate-argument structure: Intersectivity
Premise: You know that some actions must be taken when grandma reacts with the sad emoji.
Hypothesis: You know that some life changing actions must be taken when grandma reacts with the sad emoji.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Upward monotone
Predicate-argument structure: Intersectivity
Premise: You know that some life changing actions must be taken when grandma reacts with the sad emoji.
Hypothesis: You know that some life-changing actions must be taken when grandma reacts with emoji.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Downward monotone;Conditionals
Predicate-argument structure: Intersectivity
Premise: You know that some life-changing actions must be taken when grandma reacts with emoji.
Hypothesis: You know that some life changing actions must be taken when grandma reacts with the sad emoji.
Label: entailment
Logic: Downward monotone;Conditionals
Predicate-argument structure: Intersectivity
Premise: I have never seen a hummingbird not flying.
Hypothesis: I have always seen hummingbirds flying.
Label: entailment
Logic: Double negation
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: I have always seen hummingbirds flying.
Hypothesis: I have never seen a hummingbird not flying.
Label: entailment
Logic: Double negation
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: I have never seen a hummingbird not flying.
Hypothesis: I have never seen a hummingbird.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Downward monotone
Premise: I have never seen a hummingbird.
Hypothesis: I have never seen a hummingbird not flying.
Label: entailment
Logic: Downward monotone
Premise: I have never seen a hummingbird not flying.
Hypothesis: I have never seen a bird not flying.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Downward monotone
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: I have never seen a bird not flying.
Hypothesis: I have never seen a hummingbird not flying.
Label: entailment
Logic: Downward monotone
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: I wish I could give both of you an upvote to share.
Hypothesis: I wish I could give an upvote to both of you to share.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Datives
Premise: I wish I could give an upvote to both of you to share.
Hypothesis: I wish I could give both of you an upvote to share.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Datives
Premise: I wish I could give both of you an upvote to share.
Hypothesis: I wish both of you could get an upvote from me to share.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Datives
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: I wish both of you could get an upvote from me to share.
Hypothesis: I wish I could give both of you an upvote to share.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Datives
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright orange and red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Hypothesis: Hummingbirds are red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: Hummingbirds are red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Hypothesis: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright orange and red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright orange and red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Hypothesis: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Hypothesis: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright orange and red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Coordination scope
Premise: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright orange and red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Hypothesis: The feeders are usually coloured so as to attract hummingbirds.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The feeders are usually coloured so as to attract hummingbirds.
Hypothesis: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright orange and red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright orange and red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Hypothesis: Hummingbirds have monochromatic vision.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Hummingbirds have monochromatic vision.
Hypothesis: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright orange and red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright orange and red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Hypothesis: Hummingbirds will feed from feeders of all colours.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Hummingbirds will feed from feeders of all colours.
Hypothesis: Hummingbirds are really attracted to bright orange and red (hence why the feeders are usually these colours).
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Temperature and snow consistency must be just right.
Hypothesis: Temperature must be just right.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: Temperature must be just right.
Hypothesis: Temperature and snow consistency must be just right.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: After the clingers completely immobilize her, I carry her to the tub.
Hypothesis: After the clingers completely immobilize her, I carry her to the tub or sink.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: After the clingers completely immobilize her, I carry her to the tub or sink.
Hypothesis: After the clingers completely immobilize her, I carry her to the tub.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Life is either a daring adventure or nothing at all.
Hypothesis: Life is nothing at all.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Life is nothing at all.
Hypothesis: Life is either a daring adventure or nothing at all.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Life is either a daring adventure or nothing at all.
Hypothesis: Life is a daring adventure.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Life is a daring adventure.
Hypothesis: Life is either a daring adventure or nothing at all.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Life is either a daring adventure or nothing at all.
Hypothesis: Life is a not a daring adventure.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction;Negation
Premise: Life is a not a daring adventure.
Hypothesis: Life is either a daring adventure or nothing at all.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction;Negation
Premise: Just watched the first 15 minutes, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Hypothesis: Just watched the first 30 minutes, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers;Non-monotone
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Just watched the first 30 minutes, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Hypothesis: Just watched the first 15 minutes, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers;Non-monotone
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Just watched the first 15 minutes, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Hypothesis: Just watched the first 10 minutes, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers;Non-monotone
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Just watched the first 10 minutes, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Hypothesis: Just watched the first 15 minutes, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers;Non-monotone
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Just watched the first 15 minutes, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Hypothesis: Just watched the first quarter hour, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Label: entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers;Non-monotone
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Just watched the first quarter hour, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Hypothesis: Just watched the first 15 minutes, got bored, skipped to the magic bit, it's funnier as a GIF.
Label: entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers;Non-monotone
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Has bad reviews on Amazon but this clip was funny.
Hypothesis: This clip was funny.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: This clip was funny.
Hypothesis: Has bad reviews on Amazon but this clip was funny.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: You’re walking through the woods, there’s no one around and your phone is dead, out of the corner of your eye you spot him, Shia LaBeouf!
Hypothesis: You’re walking through the woods, there are lurkers are around and your phone is dead, out of the corner of your eye you spot him, Shia LaBeouf!
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Existential;Negation
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: You’re walking through the woods, there are lurkers are around and your phone is dead, out of the corner of your eye you spot him, Shia LaBeouf!
Hypothesis: You’re walking through the woods, there’s no one around and your phone is dead, out of the corner of your eye you spot him, Shia LaBeouf!
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Existential;Negation
Lexical semantics: Quantifiers
Premise: Weird that you want to show something to a stack of papers.
Hypothesis: Weird that you want to show this video to a stack of papers.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Existential;Upward monotone
Premise: Weird that you want to show this video to a stack of papers.
Hypothesis: Weird that you want to show something to a stack of papers.
Label: entailment
Logic: Existential;Upward monotone
Premise: I think this was part of the last season of Bojack Horseman.
Hypothesis: I think this was part of the last episode of Bojack Horseman.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: I think this was part of the last episode of Bojack Horseman.
Hypothesis: I think this was part of the last season of Bojack Horseman.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: If you think about it, it's the perfect reverse psychology tactic.
Hypothesis: It's the perfect reverse psychology tactic.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Premise: It's the perfect reverse psychology tactic.
Hypothesis: If you think about it, it's the perfect reverse psychology tactic.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conditionals
Premise: This is honestly the most oniony article I've seen on the entire internet.
Hypothesis: This article reads like satire.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: This article reads like satire.
Hypothesis: This is honestly the most oniony article I've seen on the entire internet.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: If everyone believed my jokes, they'd know exactly who I was.
Hypothesis: My jokes fully reveal my character.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: My jokes fully reveal my character.
Hypothesis: If everyone believed my jokes, they'd know exactly who I was.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: If everyone believed my jokes, they'd know exactly who I was.
Hypothesis: My jokes reflect exactly zero of my character.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: My jokes reflect exactly zero of my character.
Hypothesis: If everyone believed my jokes, they'd know exactly who I was.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: If everyone believed my jokes, they'd know exactly who I was.
Hypothesis: If everyone believed my jokes, they'd be quite concerned for me.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: If everyone believed my jokes, they'd be quite concerned for me.
Hypothesis: If everyone believed my jokes, they'd know exactly who I was.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: In the 1890's a typical worker worked 60 hours per week; down to 48 by 1920 and 40 by 1940.
Hypothesis: Working hours go up as you look further back in time from 1940.
Label: entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: Working hours go up as you look further back in time from 1940.
Hypothesis: In the 1890's a typical worker worked 60 hours per week; down to 48 by 1920 and 40 by 1940.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: In the 1890's a typical worker worked 60 hours per week; down to 48 by 1920 and 40 by 1940.
Hypothesis: Working hours go down as you look further back in time from 1940.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: Working hours go down as you look further back in time from 1940.
Hypothesis: In the 1890's a typical worker worked 60 hours per week; down to 48 by 1920 and 40 by 1940.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: There was a book I was trying to import and I saw that it was finally available with Amazon Prime shipping and I ended up paying like double the other prices to have it in 2 days vs. 2 weeks.
Hypothesis: I waited until Prime availability and paid a higher sticker price for a book so I could get free 2-day shipping.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: I waited until Prime availability and paid a higher sticker price for a book so I could get free 2-day shipping.
Hypothesis: There was a book I was trying to import and I saw that it was finally available with Amazon Prime shipping and I ended up paying like double the other prices to have it in 2 days vs. 2 weeks.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: There was a book I was trying to import and I saw that it was finally available with Amazon Prime shipping and I ended up paying like double the other prices to have it in 2 days vs. 2 weeks.
Hypothesis: I waited until Prime availability and paid a higher Shipping & Handling fee to have a book in 2 days vs. 2 weeks.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: I waited until Prime availability and paid a higher Shipping & Handling fee to have a book in 2 days vs. 2 weeks.
Hypothesis: There was a book I was trying to import and I saw that it was finally available with Amazon Prime shipping and I ended up paying like double the other prices to have it in 2 days vs. 2 weeks.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Supply and demand... scarcity... all these economic principles that determine the cost of things really boil down to the value of human labor.
Hypothesis: The Labor Theory of Value is at the heart of the economics of cost.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The Labor Theory of Value is at the heart of the economics of cost.
Hypothesis: Supply and demand... scarcity... all these economic principles that determine the cost of things really boil down to the value of human labor.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Supply and demand... scarcity... all these economic principles that determine the cost of things really boil down to the value of human labor.
Hypothesis: The Labor Theory of Value is a scarce determinant of the economics of cost.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The Labor Theory of Value is a scarce determinant of the economics of cost.
Hypothesis: Supply and demand... scarcity... all these economic principles that determine the cost of things really boil down to the value of human labor.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Supply and demand... scarcity... all these economic principles that determine the cost of things really boil down to the value of human labor.
Hypothesis: Supply and demand... scarcity... all these economic principles that determine the cost of things are related to the value of human labor.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Supply and demand... scarcity... all these economic principles that determine the cost of things are related to the value of human labor.
Hypothesis: Supply and demand... scarcity... all these economic principles that determine the cost of things really boil down to the value of human labor.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: While their designed displacement was 262 tonnes (258 long tons), they displaced about 320 tonnes (310 long tons) fully loaded.
Hypothesis: Their loading capacity was about 58 tonnes.
Label: entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Their loading capacity was about 58 tonnes.
Hypothesis: While their designed displacement was 262 tonnes (258 long tons), they displaced about 320 tonnes (310 long tons) fully loaded.
Label: entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: While their designed displacement was 262 tonnes (258 long tons), they displaced about 320 tonnes (310 long tons) fully loaded.
Hypothesis: Their loading capacity was about 262 tonnes.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Their loading capacity was about 262 tonnes.
Hypothesis: While their designed displacement was 262 tonnes (258 long tons), they displaced about 320 tonnes (310 long tons) fully loaded.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Due to inadequate funding, 76 T and the rest of the 250t class were essentially coastal vessels, despite the original intention that they would be used for "high seas" operations.
Hypothesis: Due to inadequate funding, 76 T and the rest of the 250t class were essentially high seas vessels, despite the original intention that they would be used for coastal operations.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Due to inadequate funding, 76 T and the rest of the 250t class were essentially high seas vessels, despite the original intention that they would be used for coastal operations.
Hypothesis: Due to inadequate funding, 76 T and the rest of the 250t class were essentially coastal vessels, despite the original intention that they would be used for "high seas" operations.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: He stayed in England until November 1918, when he again took up his YMCA duties, establishing a rest hut and library in Cologne.
Hypothesis: He stayed in England until November 1918, when he again took up his YMCA duties, establishing a rest hut and library in Germany.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: He stayed in England until November 1918, when he again took up his YMCA duties, establishing a rest hut and library in Germany.
Hypothesis: He stayed in England until November 1918, when he again took up his YMCA duties, establishing a rest hut and library in Cologne.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: He stayed in England until November 1918, when he again took up his YMCA duties, establishing a rest hut and library in Cologne.
Hypothesis: He stayed in England until November 1918, when he again took up his YMCA duties, establishing a rest hut and library in Italy.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: He stayed in England until November 1918, when he again took up his YMCA duties, establishing a rest hut and library in Italy.
Hypothesis: He stayed in England until November 1918, when he again took up his YMCA duties, establishing a rest hut and library in Cologne.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Throughout the Raffles stories patriotism runs as an intermittent theme—to such an extent that the writer William Vivian Butler describes him as a "super-patriot".
Hypothesis: Throughout the Raffles stories patriotism runs as an intermittent theme—to such an extent that the writer William Vivian Butler describes him as a "anti-patriot".
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Throughout the Raffles stories patriotism runs as an intermittent theme—to such an extent that the writer William Vivian Butler describes him as a "anti-patriot".
Hypothesis: Throughout the Raffles stories patriotism runs as an intermittent theme—to such an extent that the writer William Vivian Butler describes him as a "super-patriot".
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: A faint constellation, its three brightest stars—Alpha, Beta and Gamma Pyxidis—are in a rough line.
Hypothesis: A faint constellation, its three brightest stars—Alpha, Beta and Gamma Pyxidis—are in an equilateral triangle.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: A faint constellation, its three brightest stars—Alpha, Beta and Gamma Pyxidis—are in an equilateral triangle.
Hypothesis: A faint constellation, its three brightest stars—Alpha, Beta and Gamma Pyxidis—are in a rough line.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Kappa Pyxidis was catalogued but not given a Bayer designation by Lacaille, but Gould felt the star was bright enough to warrant a letter.
Hypothesis: Lacaille and Gould agreed about the designation of Kappa Pyxidis.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Lacaille and Gould agreed about the designation of Kappa Pyxidis.
Hypothesis: Kappa Pyxidis was catalogued but not given a Bayer designation by Lacaille, but Gould felt the star was bright enough to warrant a letter.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Kappa Pyxidis was catalogued but not given a Bayer designation by Lacaille, but Gould felt the star was bright enough to warrant a letter.
Hypothesis: Lacaille and Gould disagreed about the designation of Kappa Pyxidis.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Lacaille and Gould disagreed about the designation of Kappa Pyxidis.
Hypothesis: Kappa Pyxidis was catalogued but not given a Bayer designation by Lacaille, but Gould felt the star was bright enough to warrant a letter.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: A formation of approximately 50 officers of the Baltimore Police eventually placed themselves between the rioters and the militiamen, allowing the 6th Massachusetts to proceed to Camden Station.
Hypothesis: A formation of approximately 50 officers of the police of the City of Baltimore eventually placed themselves between the rioters and the militiamen, allowing the 6th Massachusetts to proceed to Camden Station.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Genitives/Partitives
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Premise: A formation of approximately 50 officers of the police of the City of Baltimore eventually placed themselves between the rioters and the militiamen, allowing the 6th Massachusetts to proceed to Camden Station.
Hypothesis: A formation of approximately 50 officers of the Baltimore Police eventually placed themselves between the rioters and the militiamen, allowing the 6th Massachusetts to proceed to Camden Station.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Genitives/Partitives
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Premise: A formation of approximately 50 officers of the Baltimore Police eventually placed themselves between the rioters and the militiamen, allowing the 6th Massachusetts to proceed to Camden Station.
Hypothesis: A formation of approximately 50 officers of the police of from outside Baltimore eventually placed themselves between the rioters and the militiamen, allowing the 6th Massachusetts to proceed to Camden Station.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: Common sense