budecosystem/superglue_ax_b huggingface dataset:
Premise: Thought this was super cool, and a really important step in preserving all the physical books.
Hypothesis: Thought this was super cool, and a really important step in the processing of all the physical books.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Nominalization
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Thought this was super cool, and a really important step in the processing of all the physical books.
Hypothesis: Thought this was super cool, and a really important step in preserving all the physical books.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Nominalization
Lexical semantics: Lexical entailment
Premise: Thought this was super cool, and a really important step in preserving all the physical books.
Hypothesis: Thought this was super cool, and a really important step in all the physical books' preservation.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Nominalization;Genitives/Partitives
Premise: Thought this was super cool, and a really important step in all the physical books' preservation.
Hypothesis: Thought this was super cool, and a really important step in preserving all the physical books.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Nominalization;Genitives/Partitives
Premise: During World War II, the five remaining Greek boats were sunk by Axis aircraft during the German invasion of Greece in April 1941.
Hypothesis: During World War II, the five remaining Greek boats were sunk by Axis aircraft when the Germans invaded Greece in April 1941.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Nominalization
Premise: During World War II, the five remaining Greek boats were sunk by Axis aircraft when the Germans invaded Greece in April 1941.
Hypothesis: During World War II, the five remaining Greek boats were sunk by Axis aircraft during the German invasion of Greece in April 1941.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Nominalization
Premise: During World War II, the five remaining Greek boats were sunk by Axis aircraft during the German invasion of Greece in April 1941.
Hypothesis: During World War II, the five remaining Greek boats were sunk by Axis aircraft during the Greek invasion of Germany in April 1941.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Nominalization
Premise: During World War II, the five remaining Greek boats were sunk by Axis aircraft during the Greek invasion of Germany in April 1941.
Hypothesis: During World War II, the five remaining Greek boats were sunk by Axis aircraft during the German invasion of Greece in April 1941.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Nominalization
Premise: Often, the first step in building statistical NLP models involves feature extraction.
Hypothesis: Often, the first step in building statistical NLP models involves extracting features.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Nominalization
Premise: Often, the first step in building statistical NLP models involves extracting features.
Hypothesis: Often, the first step in building statistical NLP models involves feature extraction.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Nominalization
Premise: Bob likes Alice.
Hypothesis: Alice likes Bob.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Alice likes Bob.
Hypothesis: Bob likes Alice.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Bob is Alice's parent.
Hypothesis: Alice is Bob's parent.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Alice is Bob's parent.
Hypothesis: Bob is Alice's parent.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: President Trump will ask Republican lawmakers to use a controversial White House framework as the baseline for a coming Senate debate on immigration policy.
Hypothesis: Republican lawmakers will ask President Trump to use a controversial White House framework as the baseline for a coming Senate debate on immigration policy.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Republican lawmakers will ask President Trump to use a controversial White House framework as the baseline for a coming Senate debate on immigration policy.
Hypothesis: President Trump will ask Republican lawmakers to use a controversial White House framework as the baseline for a coming Senate debate on immigration policy.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Mythbusters proved that bulls react to movement and not color.
Hypothesis: Bulls proved that mythbusters react to movement and not color.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Bulls proved that mythbusters react to movement and not color.
Hypothesis: Mythbusters proved that bulls react to movement and not color.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: The models generate translations with their constituency tree and their attention-derived alignments.
Hypothesis: The translations generate models with their constituency tree and their attention-derived alignments.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: The translations generate models with their constituency tree and their attention-derived alignments.
Hypothesis: The models generate translations with their constituency tree and their attention-derived alignments.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Bob married Alice.
Hypothesis: Alice married Bob.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Alice married Bob.
Hypothesis: Bob married Alice.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: The head of Russia's foreign spy service met with top U.S. intelligence officials, despite existing sanctions.
Hypothesis: Top U.S. intelligence officials met with the head of Russia's foreign spy service, despite existing sanctions.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Top U.S. intelligence officials met with the head of Russia's foreign spy service, despite existing sanctions.
Hypothesis: The head of Russia's foreign spy service met with top U.S. intelligence officials, despite existing sanctions.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Bees do not follow the same rules as airplanes.
Hypothesis: Airplanes do not follow the same rules as bees.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Airplanes do not follow the same rules as bees.
Hypothesis: Bees do not follow the same rules as airplanes.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Bees do not follow the same rules as airplanes.
Hypothesis: Bees fly using a different mechanism from airplanes.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Bees fly using a different mechanism from airplanes.
Hypothesis: Bees do not follow the same rules as airplanes.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Bees do not follow the same rules as airplanes.
Hypothesis: Bees fly using the same mechanism as airplanes.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Bees fly using the same mechanism as airplanes.
Hypothesis: Bees do not follow the same rules as airplanes.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Bees do not follow the same rules as airplanes.
Hypothesis: Bees are more energy-efficient flyers than airplanes.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Bees are more energy-efficient flyers than airplanes.
Hypothesis: Bees do not follow the same rules as airplanes.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Leslie Dixon is married to fellow screenwriter and producer Tom Ropelewski.
Hypothesis: Tom Ropelewski is married to fellow screenwriter and producer Leslie Dixon.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Tom Ropelewski is married to fellow screenwriter and producer Leslie Dixon.
Hypothesis: Leslie Dixon is married to fellow screenwriter and producer Tom Ropelewski.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: This means that solving analogy questions with vector arithmetic is mathematically equivalent to seeking a word that is similar to x and y but is different from z.
Hypothesis: This means that seeking a word that is similar to x and y but is different from z is mathematically equivalent to solving analogy questions with vector arithmetic.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: This means that seeking a word that is similar to x and y but is different from z is mathematically equivalent to solving analogy questions with vector arithmetic.
Hypothesis: This means that solving analogy questions with vector arithmetic is mathematically equivalent to seeking a word that is similar to x and y but is different from z.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Bob married Alice.
Hypothesis: Bob and Alice got married.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Bob and Alice got married.
Hypothesis: Bob married Alice.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Tulsi Gabbard disagrees with Bernie Sanders on what is the best way to deal with Bashar al-Assad.
Hypothesis: Tulsi Gabbard and Bernie Sanders disagree on what is the best way to deal with Bashar al-Assad.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Tulsi Gabbard and Bernie Sanders disagree on what is the best way to deal with Bashar al-Assad.
Hypothesis: Tulsi Gabbard disagrees with Bernie Sanders on what is the best way to deal with Bashar al-Assad.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: It reminds me of the times I played Super Mario with my little brother.
Hypothesis: It reminds me of the times my little brother and I played Super Mario.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: It reminds me of the times my little brother and I played Super Mario.
Hypothesis: It reminds me of the times I played Super Mario with my little brother.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: In this PC game, Shredder fights the turtles in his Manhattan hideout.
Hypothesis: In this PC game, Shredder and the turtles fight in his Manhattan hideout.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: In this PC game, Shredder and the turtles fight in his Manhattan hideout.
Hypothesis: In this PC game, Shredder fights the turtles in his Manhattan hideout.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: If their vectors' cosine similarity is high, we can conclude that "cat" is similar to "dog".
Hypothesis: If their vectors' cosine similarity is high, we can conclude that "cat" and "dog" are similar.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: If their vectors' cosine similarity is high, we can conclude that "cat" and "dog" are similar.
Hypothesis: If their vectors' cosine similarity is high, we can conclude that "cat" is similar to "dog".
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args
Lexical semantics: Symmetry/Collectivity
Premise: Jane had a party on Sunday.
Hypothesis: On Sunday, Jane had a party.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: On Sunday, Jane had a party.
Hypothesis: Jane had a party on Sunday.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: For decades, the FBI has been trusted to investigate corruption inside the government.
Hypothesis: The FBI has been trusted to investigate corruption inside the government for decades.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: The FBI has been trusted to investigate corruption inside the government for decades.
Hypothesis: For decades, the FBI has been trusted to investigate corruption inside the government.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: I was driving through my neighborhood a few weeks ago, and there was a lady holding a child's hand, standing on the side of the road talking to someone parked in a car.
Hypothesis: A few weeks ago, I was driving through my neighborhood, and there was a lady holding a child's hand, standing on the side of the road talking to someone parked in a car.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: A few weeks ago, I was driving through my neighborhood, and there was a lady holding a child's hand, standing on the side of the road talking to someone parked in a car.
Hypothesis: I was driving through my neighborhood a few weeks ago, and there was a lady holding a child's hand, standing on the side of the road talking to someone parked in a car.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Bass River timber was used in construction of the Empire State Building.
Hypothesis: In construction of the Empire State Building, Bass River timber was used.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: In construction of the Empire State Building, Bass River timber was used.
Hypothesis: Bass River timber was used in construction of the Empire State Building.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: In this paper, we present an approach to acquire trivial physical knowledge from unstructured natural language text.
Hypothesis: We present in this paper an approach to acquire trivial physical knowledge from unstructured natural language text.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: We present in this paper an approach to acquire trivial physical knowledge from unstructured natural language text.
Hypothesis: In this paper, we present an approach to acquire trivial physical knowledge from unstructured natural language text.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: In this paper, we present an approach to acquire trivial physical knowledge from unstructured natural language text.
Hypothesis: We present an approach to acquire trivial physical knowledge from the unstructured natural language text of this paper.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: We present an approach to acquire trivial physical knowledge from the unstructured natural language text of this paper.
Hypothesis: In this paper, we present an approach to acquire trivial physical knowledge from unstructured natural language text.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: I ate pizza with friends.
Hypothesis: I ate pizza.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: I ate pizza.
Hypothesis: I ate pizza with friends.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: I ate pizza with some friends.
Hypothesis: I ate some friends.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: I ate some friends.
Hypothesis: I ate pizza with some friends.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: I ate pizza with olives.
Hypothesis: I ate pizza.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: I ate pizza.
Hypothesis: I ate pizza with olives.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: I ate pizza with olives.
Hypothesis: I ate olives.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: I ate olives.
Hypothesis: I ate pizza with olives.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion with Russia.
Hypothesis: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion.
Hypothesis: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion with Russia.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion with Russia.
Hypothesis: Mueller received a mandate to investigate with Russia.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Mueller received a mandate to investigate with Russia.
Hypothesis: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion with Russia.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion with vast resources.
Hypothesis: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion.
Hypothesis: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion with vast resources.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion with vast resources.
Hypothesis: Mueller received a mandate to investigate with vast resources.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Mueller received a mandate to investigate with vast resources.
Hypothesis: Mueller received a mandate to investigate possible collusion with vast resources.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism in the faucet.
Hypothesis: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism.
Hypothesis: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism in the faucet.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism in the faucet.
Hypothesis: They should be attached in the faucet.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: They should be attached in the faucet.
Hypothesis: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism in the faucet.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism in an unbreakable knot.
Hypothesis: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism.
Hypothesis: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism in an unbreakable knot.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism in an unbreakable knot.
Hypothesis: They should be attached in an unbreakable knot.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: They should be attached in an unbreakable knot.
Hypothesis: They should be attached to the lifting mechanism in an unbreakable knot.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle with only partial success.
Hypothesis: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used with only partial success.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used with only partial success.
Hypothesis: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle with only partial success.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle with only partial success.
Hypothesis: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle.
Hypothesis: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle with only partial success.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle with German forces.
Hypothesis: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used with German forces.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used with German forces.
Hypothesis: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle with German forces.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle with German forces.
Hypothesis: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle.
Hypothesis: Tanks were developed by Britain and France, and were first used in combat by the British during a battle with German forces.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: We propose models of the probability distribution from which the attested vowel inventories have been drawn.
Hypothesis: We propose models of the probability distribution.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: We propose models of the probability distribution.
Hypothesis: We propose models of the probability distribution from which the attested vowel inventories have been drawn.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: We propose models of the probability distribution from which the attested vowel inventories have been drawn.
Hypothesis: We propose models from which the attested vowel inventories have been drawn.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: We propose models from which the attested vowel inventories have been drawn.
Hypothesis: We propose models of the probability distribution from which the attested vowel inventories have been drawn.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: We propose models of the probability distribution from a restricted space of linear functions.
Hypothesis: We propose models of the probability distribution.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: We propose models of the probability distribution.
Hypothesis: We propose models of the probability distribution from a restricted space of linear functions.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: We propose models of the probability distribution from a restricted space of linear functions.
Hypothesis: We propose models from a restricted space of linear functions.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: We propose models from a restricted space of linear functions.
Hypothesis: We propose models of the probability distribution from a restricted space of linear functions.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Prepositional phrases
Premise: George went to the lake to catch a fish, but he fell into the water.
Hypothesis: George fell into the water.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: George fell into the water.
Hypothesis: George went to the lake to catch a fish, but he fell into the water.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: George went to the lake to catch a fish, but he fell into the water.
Hypothesis: A fish fell into the water.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: A fish fell into the water.
Hypothesis: George went to the lake to catch a fish, but he fell into the water.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The Republican party almost universally opposed that bill in 2009, which cost $787 billion over 10 years, on the grounds that it would increase the debt too much.
Hypothesis: That bill would increase the debt too much.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: That bill would increase the debt too much.
Hypothesis: The Republican party almost universally opposed that bill in 2009, which cost $787 billion over 10 years, on the grounds that it would increase the debt too much.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The Republican party almost universally opposed that bill in 2009, which cost $787 billion over 10 years, on the grounds that it would increase the debt too much.
Hypothesis: The Republican party would increase the debt too much.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The Republican party would increase the debt too much.
Hypothesis: The Republican party almost universally opposed that bill in 2009, which cost $787 billion over 10 years, on the grounds that it would increase the debt too much.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The climbing beans choked the corn, and the squash grew so big that it overshadowed several adjacent rows of beans.
Hypothesis: The squash overshadowed several adjacent rows of beans.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The squash overshadowed several adjacent rows of beans.
Hypothesis: The climbing beans choked the corn, and the squash grew so big that it overshadowed several adjacent rows of beans.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The climbing beans choked the corn, and the squash grew so big that it overshadowed several adjacent rows of beans.
Hypothesis: The corn overshadowed several adjacent rows of beans.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The corn overshadowed several adjacent rows of beans.
Hypothesis: The climbing beans choked the corn, and the squash grew so big that it overshadowed several adjacent rows of beans.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Because Britain still maintained control of Canada's foreign affairs under the Confederation Act, its declaration of war in 1914 automatically brought Canada into World War I.
Hypothesis: Britain's declaration of war in 1914 automatically brought Canada into World War I.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Britain's declaration of war in 1914 automatically brought Canada into World War I.
Hypothesis: Because Britain still maintained control of Canada's foreign affairs under the Confederation Act, its declaration of war in 1914 automatically brought Canada into World War I.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Because Britain still maintained control of Canada's foreign affairs under the Confederation Act, its declaration of war in 1914 automatically brought Canada into World War I.
Hypothesis: Canada's declaration of war in 1914 automatically brought Canada into World War I.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Canada's declaration of war in 1914 automatically brought Canada into World War I.
Hypothesis: Because Britain still maintained control of Canada's foreign affairs under the Confederation Act, its declaration of war in 1914 automatically brought Canada into World War I.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: We show that if coreference resolvers mainly rely on lexical features, they can hardly generalize to unseen domains.
Hypothesis: Coreference resolvers can hardly generalize to unseen domains.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Coreference resolvers can hardly generalize to unseen domains.
Hypothesis: We show that if coreference resolvers mainly rely on lexical features, they can hardly generalize to unseen domains.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: We show that if coreference resolvers mainly rely on lexical features, they can hardly generalize to unseen domains.
Hypothesis: Lexical features can hardly generalize to unseen domains.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: Lexical features can hardly generalize to unseen domains.
Hypothesis: We show that if coreference resolvers mainly rely on lexical features, they can hardly generalize to unseen domains.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Stockholm.
Hypothesis: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Sweden.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Sweden.
Hypothesis: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Stockholm.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Stockholm.
Hypothesis: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Europe.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Europe.
Hypothesis: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Stockholm.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Stockholm.
Hypothesis: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Oslo.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Oslo.
Hypothesis: The sides came to an agreement after their meeting in Stockholm.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Musk decided to offer up his personal Tesla roadster.
Hypothesis: Musk decided to offer up his personal car.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Musk decided to offer up his personal car.
Hypothesis: Musk decided to offer up his personal Tesla roadster.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Musk decided to offer up his personal Tesla roadster.
Hypothesis: Musk decided to offer up his personal yacht.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Musk decided to offer up his personal yacht.
Hypothesis: Musk decided to offer up his personal Tesla roadster.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: TIL David Attenborough and Queen Elizabeth II are roughly the same age.
Hypothesis: TIL David Attenborough and the Queen of England are roughly the same age.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: TIL David Attenborough and the Queen of England are roughly the same age.
Hypothesis: TIL David Attenborough and Queen Elizabeth II are roughly the same age.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: TIL David Attenborough and Queen Elizabeth II are roughly the same age.
Hypothesis: TIL David Attenborough and the Queen of Denmark are roughly the same age.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: TIL David Attenborough and the Queen of Denmark are roughly the same age.
Hypothesis: TIL David Attenborough and Queen Elizabeth II are roughly the same age.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The Sydney area has been inhabited by indigenous Australians for at least 30,000 years.
Hypothesis: The Sydney area has been inhabited by Aboriginal people for at least 30,000 years.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The Sydney area has been inhabited by Aboriginal people for at least 30,000 years.
Hypothesis: The Sydney area has been inhabited by indigenous Australians for at least 30,000 years.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The Sydney area has been inhabited by indigenous Australians for at least 30,000 years.
Hypothesis: The Sydney area has been inhabited by Europeans for at least 30,000 years.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: The Sydney area has been inhabited by Europeans for at least 30,000 years.
Hypothesis: The Sydney area has been inhabited by indigenous Australians for at least 30,000 years.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Deep neural networks have achieved impressive performance in supervised classification and structured prediction tasks.
Hypothesis: Deep learning has achieved impressive performance in supervised classification and structured prediction tasks.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Deep learning has achieved impressive performance in supervised classification and structured prediction tasks.
Hypothesis: Deep neural networks have achieved impressive performance in supervised classification and structured prediction tasks.
Label: entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Deep neural networks have achieved impressive performance in supervised classification and structured prediction tasks.
Hypothesis: Decision trees have achieved impressive performance in supervised classification and structured prediction tasks.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Decision trees have achieved impressive performance in supervised classification and structured prediction tasks.
Hypothesis: Deep neural networks have achieved impressive performance in supervised classification and structured prediction tasks.
Label: not_entailment
Lexical semantics: Named entities
Knowledge: World knowledge
Premise: Dave jumped into the lake.
Hypothesis: Dave was wet.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Dave was wet.
Hypothesis: Dave jumped into the lake.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Dave jumped into the lake.
Hypothesis: Dave was hungry.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Dave was hungry.
Hypothesis: Dave jumped into the lake.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Even if the Senate is able to pass a bill, it’s far from certain that the House will move ahead with it.
Hypothesis: The House might kill the bill anyway.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The House might kill the bill anyway.
Hypothesis: Even if the Senate is able to pass a bill, it’s far from certain that the House will move ahead with it.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Even if the Senate is able to pass a bill, it’s far from certain that the House will move ahead with it.
Hypothesis: The House will pass the bill.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The House will pass the bill.
Hypothesis: Even if the Senate is able to pass a bill, it’s far from certain that the House will move ahead with it.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, someone interrupted the somber atmosphere by playing "Hyponotize" at full volume, which prompted the public to dance and sing along.
Hypothesis: Notorious B.I.G. passed away.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Notorious B.I.G. passed away.
Hypothesis: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, someone interrupted the somber atmosphere by playing "Hyponotize" at full volume, which prompted the public to dance and sing along.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, someone interrupted the somber atmosphere by playing "Hyponotize" at full volume, which prompted the public to dance and sing along.
Hypothesis: Notorious B.I.G. hosted his funeral.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Notorious B.I.G. hosted his funeral.
Hypothesis: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, someone interrupted the somber atmosphere by playing "Hyponotize" at full volume, which prompted the public to dance and sing along.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, someone interrupted the somber atmosphere by playing "Hyponotize" at full volume, which prompted the public to dance and sing along.
Hypothesis: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, there was a somber atmosphere part of the time.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, there was a somber atmosphere part of the time.
Hypothesis: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, someone interrupted the somber atmosphere by playing "Hyponotize" at full volume, which prompted the public to dance and sing along.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, someone interrupted the somber atmosphere by playing "Hyponotize" at full volume, which prompted the public to dance and sing along.
Hypothesis: Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession was attended by the general public.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession was attended by the general public.
Hypothesis: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, someone interrupted the somber atmosphere by playing "Hyponotize" at full volume, which prompted the public to dance and sing along.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, someone interrupted the somber atmosphere by playing "Hyponotize" at full volume, which prompted the public to dance and sing along.
Hypothesis: Only members of the public attended B.I.G.'s funeral procession was restricted to an exclusive club of associates.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Only members of the public attended B.I.G.'s funeral procession was restricted to an exclusive club of associates.
Hypothesis: During Notorious B.I.G.'s funeral procession through the streets of Brooklyn, someone interrupted the somber atmosphere by playing "Hyponotize" at full volume, which prompted the public to dance and sing along.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The problem in Ireland was not lack of food, which was plentiful, but the price of it, which was beyond the reach of the poor.
Hypothesis: Poor Irish people could not get food because it was too expensive.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Poor Irish people could not get food because it was too expensive.
Hypothesis: The problem in Ireland was not lack of food, which was plentiful, but the price of it, which was beyond the reach of the poor.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The problem in Ireland was not lack of food, which was plentiful, but the price of it, which was beyond the reach of the poor.
Hypothesis: The poor in Ireland starved.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The poor in Ireland starved.
Hypothesis: The problem in Ireland was not lack of food, which was plentiful, but the price of it, which was beyond the reach of the poor.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The problem in Ireland was not lack of food, which was plentiful, but the price of it, which was beyond the reach of the poor.
Hypothesis: The poor in Ireland had plentiful food.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The poor in Ireland had plentiful food.
Hypothesis: The problem in Ireland was not lack of food, which was plentiful, but the price of it, which was beyond the reach of the poor.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: The problem in Ireland was not lack of food, which was plentiful, but the price of it, which was beyond the reach of the poor.
Hypothesis: The problem in Ireland was the price of food.
Label: entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args;Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The problem in Ireland was the price of food.
Hypothesis: The problem in Ireland was not lack of food, which was plentiful, but the price of it, which was beyond the reach of the poor.
Label: not_entailment
Predicate-argument structure: Core args;Anaphora/Coreference
Premise: The problem in Ireland was not lack of food, which was plentiful, but the price of it, which was beyond the reach of the poor.
Hypothesis: The problem in Ireland was lack of food.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Premise: The problem in Ireland was lack of food.
Hypothesis: The problem in Ireland was not lack of food, which was plentiful, but the price of it, which was beyond the reach of the poor.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Negation
Premise: This dataset is two orders of magnitude larger than all other existing resources.
Hypothesis: Every other existing resource is smaller than this dataset.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: Every other existing resource is smaller than this dataset.
Hypothesis: This dataset is two orders of magnitude larger than all other existing resources.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: This dataset is two orders of magnitude larger than all other existing resources.
Hypothesis: This dataset is very big.
Label: entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: This dataset is very big.
Hypothesis: This dataset is two orders of magnitude larger than all other existing resources.
Label: not_entailment
Knowledge: Common sense
Premise: I have failed my resolutions every year since 1997, and it's now 2008.
Hypothesis: I failed my resolutions in 2004.
Label: entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: I failed my resolutions in 2004.
Hypothesis: I have failed my resolutions every year since 1997, and it's now 2008.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: I have failed my resolutions every year since 1997, and it's now 2008.
Hypothesis: I failed my resolutions in 1995.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: I failed my resolutions in 1995.
Hypothesis: I have failed my resolutions every year since 1997, and it's now 2008.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: I have failed my resolutions every year since 1997, and it's now 2008.
Hypothesis: I did not fail my resolutions in 2004.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: I did not fail my resolutions in 2004.
Hypothesis: I have failed my resolutions every year since 1997, and it's now 2008.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: I have failed my resolutions every year since 1997, and it's now 2008.
Hypothesis: I did not fail my resolutions in 1995.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: I did not fail my resolutions in 1995.
Hypothesis: I have failed my resolutions every year since 1997, and it's now 2008.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Intervals/Numbers
Premise: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: The doctor bears some responsibility for successful care.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: The doctor bears some responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: The doctor does not bear responsibility for successful care.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction;Negation
Premise: The doctor does not bear responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction;Negation
Premise: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: The patient bears some responsibility for successful care.
Label: entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: The patient bears some responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: The patient does not bear responsibility for successful care.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction;Negation
Premise: The patient does not bear responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction;Negation
Premise: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: The attorney bears some responsibility for successful care.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: The attorney bears some responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction
Premise: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: The attorney does not bear responsibility for successful care.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction;Negation
Premise: The attorney does not bear responsibility for successful care.
Hypothesis: Both doctor and patient bear some responsibility for successful care.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Conjunction;Negation
Premise: Either he has a blind trust or he has a conflict of interest.
Hypothesis: He has a conflict of interest.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: He has a conflict of interest.
Hypothesis: Either he has a blind trust or he has a conflict of interest.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Either he has a blind trust or he has a conflict of interest.
Hypothesis: He does not have a conflict of interest.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction;Negation
Premise: He does not have a conflict of interest.
Hypothesis: Either he has a blind trust or he has a conflict of interest.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction;Negation
Premise: Either he has a blind trust or he has a conflict of interest.
Hypothesis: He has a blind trust.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: He has a blind trust.
Hypothesis: Either he has a blind trust or he has a conflict of interest.
Label: entailment
Logic: Disjunction
Premise: Either he has a blind trust or he has a conflict of interest.
Hypothesis: He does not have a blind trust.
Label: not_entailment
Logic: Disjunction;Negation