Patient perceptions of clinical pharmacists in general practice
Authors: Thompson J , Al-Attbi S , Patel B 
Published: April 2022

Abstract

Introduction
As a result of changes in the demands and pressures on the NHS, the role of the pharmacist has advanced from purely dispensing and compounding medicines to a more clinical and patient-centred approach to care (1). Since 2015, NHS England set a target of recruiting practice-based pharmacists into 20% of practices by 2020-2021 as a way of reducing these pressures (2). Conducting evaluations of clinical pharmacists in individual practices is essential for role integration and evolution.

Aim
To explore patient perceptions of clinical pharmacists across three general practices.

Methods
A paper-based questionnaire consisting of open and closed questions was used to gather patient perceptions on the role of a clinical pharmacist and their consultation experiences. Participants included patients over the age of 18 who had attended a face-to-face appointment with a clinical pharmacist from one of three general practice surgeries in England between November and December 2019. The clinical pharmacists were used as a gateway to recruit participants; post-consultation, the pharmacist asked patients if they would complete a questionnaire. Patients were provided with an information sheet and consent form prior to completion of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was anonymous. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

Results
A total of 39 participants completed the questionnaire. Most participants were elderly (28%) and female (64%). The primary reason for the consultations was due to an acute illness (79%), and the most common outcome was the supply of a prescription (83%). Patients were predominantly unfamiliar with the role of a clinical pharmacist (56%) and 31% of patients reportedly thought their appointment had been with a doctor. All patients were positive about their experience and reported they would “be more than happy to see a pharmacist in the future” and that the role was “a very necessary addition to the practice”. All patients reported that their consultation was the same (51%) or better than they have had with a doctor (49%). Patients commented on the pharmacists’ consultation skills, making statements such as [they] “listened to me”, “asked me questions”, “were really good at explaining” and “spoke in a way I understood”. Clinical pharmacists were reported as being “very professional” and knowledgeable as “[they] knew more about my medication [than the doctor] and prescribed me something to help”. Patients reported that they would recommend the clinical pharmacist to their family and friends when seeking an appointment.

Conclusion
This research highlights patient acceptance towards consultations with a clinical pharmacist and reinforces the competence of pharmacists to undertake this role. A key finding related to the effective consultation skills of the pharmacists and involving the patients in their care. The number of patients who participated limits the generalisability of the findings, and the patient responses may have been a reaction to the individual clinical pharmacists rather than their thoughts on the role overall. Increased publicity and patient education of the role of a clinical pharmacist may promote a greater integration into the multidisciplinary team.

References
(1) Robertson R, Wenzel L, Thompson J, Charles A. Understanding NHS financial pressures. How are they affecting patient care. 2017. The Kings Fund. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/Understanding%20NHS%20financial%20pressures%20-%20full%20report.pdf
(2) NHS England 2016. General Practice Forward View. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gpfv.pdf