3 Two-Year Administration Data of an Oral Testosterone Undecanoate (TU) Formulation in Hypogonadal Men
Authors: Swerdloff R , Honig S , Wang C , Gittelman M , Seo BW , Rohowsky N , Dudley R 
Published: April 2022

ABSTRACT

Introduction
An oral testosterone (T) replacement therapy (TRT) would be the preferred administration route for many hypogonadal men. Until recently, the only oral TRT approved in the US was methyl-T which has been associated with hepatotoxicity.

Objective
The safety of a novel oral T undecanoate (TU) formulation was evaluated in hypogonadal men with two-year follow up.

Methods
Two open-label, multicenter, dose-titration trials were conducted in hypogonadal men (serum T ≤ 300 ng/dL) age 18-75 years. Trial I was a randomized, active-controlled, 2-arm, 12-month study. Trial 2 was a long-term extension of those who completed Trial 1. Statistical analyses were only conducted with the subjects who completed Trial 1 and continued treatment in Trial 2, thus providing up to 2 full years of data. Safety was assessed by physical exam, AE reporting, and routine clinical laboratory measurements.

Results
Overall, 86 subjects participated in both studies. T concentration increased from 193.75 ± 9.44 ng/dL (Mean ± SEM) at baseline (BL) to 475.5 ± 49.7 ng/dL after 24 Mo of therapy with oral TU, and 84% of men achieved T in eugonadal range (300-1000 ng/dL) after 90 days of therapy. Mean T concentrations remained in the eugonadal range throughout Trial 2. There were no clinically significant changes in liver function tests – ALP (64.05 ± 1.95 to 53.74 U/L ± 1.86 U/L), ALT (27.8 ± 1.40 to 26.7 ± 1.6 U/L), AST (21.6 ± 0.76 to 22.0 ± 1.0 U/L), and bilirubin (0.58 ± 0.03 to 0.52 ± 0.03 mg/dL) throughout the two studies. At d270, one subject had an ALT level of 227 U/L, which was &gt; 4x the ULN (ULN for ALT = 45 U/L). Despite continued use of oral TU, ALT was measured again on d290, and the level dropped to 87 U/L, &lt; 2x ULN. This was the only instance of an LFT elevation. There was a modest initial increase in prostate-related growth endpoints (i.e. PSA and prostate volume) that stabilized over time. Although there was a slight increase in prostate-growth related endpoints, there were no significant changes in IPSS total score (-0.06 ± 3.9 vs BL). There were significant, yet modest, increases in mean HCT (44.3 ± 0.3 to 46.6 ± 0.5%, p &lt; 0.001) and cuff systolic BP (127.1 ± 1.2 to 131.8 ± 1.67 mmHg vs BL, p = 0.006). The change in CV endpoints, including HDL-C, hematocrit, and BP, changed initially and stabilized throughout the 2 trials. For example, systolic BP varied 3 – 6 mm Hg from BL throughout the study.

Conclusions
This oral TU formulation is an option for hypogonadal men and has a safety profile consistent with other approved T products, such as a rise in hematocrit and a decrease in HDL-C. Notably, no evidence of liver toxicity was observed over 2 years. The long-term efficacy and safety profile of oral TU may provide a treatment option that avoids issues associated with other TRTs, such as injection site pain or transference to partners and children.

Disclosure
Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Clarus Therapeutics

Clarification
Industry initiated, executed and funded study
Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Clarus Therapeutics