How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect access to condoms, chlamydia and HIV testing, and cervical cancer screening at a population level in Britain? (Natsal-COVID)
Authors: Dema Emily , Sonnenberg Pam , Gibbs Jo , Conolly Anne , Willis Malachi , Riddell Julie , Perez Raquel Boso , Copas Andrew J. , Tanton Clare , Bonell Chris , Oeser Clarissa , Clifton Soazig , Unemo Magnus , Mercer Catherine H , Mitchell Kirstin R , Field Nigel 
Published: May 2022

AbstractObjectivesTo investigate how differential access to key interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections (STI), HIV, and their sequelae changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsBritish participants (18-59y) completed a cross-sectional web survey one year (March to April 2021) after the initial lockdown in Britain. Quota-based sampling and weighting resulted in a quasi-representative population sample. We compared Natsal-COVID data with Natsal-3, a household-based probability sample cross-sectional survey (16-74y) conducted in 2010-12. Reported unmet need for condoms because of the pandemic and uptake of chlamydia testing/HIV testing/cervical cancer screening were analysed among sexually-experienced participants (18-44y) (n=2869, Natsal-COVID; n=8551, Natsal-3). Odds ratios adjusted for age (aOR) and other potential confounders (AOR) describe associations with demographic and behavioural factors.ResultsIn 2021, 6.9% of women and 16.2% of men reported unmet need for condoms because of the pandemic. This was more likely among participants: aged 18-24 years, of Black or Black British ethnicity, and reporting same-sex sex (past five years) or one or more new relationships (past year). Chlamydia and HIV testing were more commonly reported by younger participants, those reporting condomless sex with new sexual partners, and men reporting same-sex partners; a very similar distribution to 10 years previously (Natsal-3). However, there were differences during the pandemic, including stronger associations with chlamydia testing for men reporting same-sex partners; with HIV testing for women reporting new sexual partners; and with cervical screening among smokers.ConclusionsOur study suggests differential access to key primary and secondary STI/HIV prevention interventions continued during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the available evidence does not suggest substantial changes in inequalities in since 2010–12. While the pandemic might not have exacerbated inequalities in access to primary and secondary prevention, it is clear that large inequalities persisted, typically among those at greatest STI/HIV risk.Key MessagesMany MSM, people of Black ethnicity and young people (i.e. groups most impacted by STIs) reported unmet need for condoms because of the pandemicWe compared inequalities in access to key interventions using Natsal-COVID (2021) and Natsal-3 (2010-12).During the pandemic (Natsal-COVID), there were stronger associations with chlamydia testing for MSM and with HIV testing for women reporting new sexual partners.There were stronger associations with cervical screening among smokers during the pandemic compared to 2010-12 (Natsal-3).However, we did not find strong evidence that vulnerable groups were at additional risk during the pandemic when compared to 2010-12.