bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Virtual assessments of infection prevention and control practices in African neonatal facilities: A pilot study
Authors: Frantzis Irene , Huebner Jack , Levasseur Stephanie , Sidiki Nabé Aboubacar , Mahida Maitry , Larussa Philip , James Wilmot G. , Stanberry Lawrence , Saiman Lisa 
Published: May 2022

Background: Evidence-based infection prevention and control (IPC) practices to reduce healthcare-associated infections in low- and middle-income countries may be difficult to implement due to lack of resources. We pilot-tested the feasibility of virtual assessments of IPC practices in African facilities caring for small and/or sick neonates for opportunities to improve IPC. Methods: We created a checklist (in English and French) to assess IPC practices in African facilities caring for small and/or sick neonates Results: In total, 10 sites participated in this pilot study. Among them, 3 sites had unreliable Internet connections, and all checklist items could be observed and scored in these videos and photos. The lowest scores occurred for kangaroo mother care (KMC) spacing and presence of screens (Table 1). Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of using virtual assessments of IPC practices. We identified several potentially low-cost opportunities to improve IPC. We are recruiting additional sites to confirm the findings of this pilot study.Funding: Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationDisclosures: None
Using a learning needs assessment to develop infection prevention training for certified nursing assistants
Authors: Garcia Erin , Mitsunaga Tisha , Haridass Vikram , Martin Brieanne , Sardana Neha , Franqui Lisa , Komaiko Kiya , Lanier Tracy , Epson Erin 
Published: May 2022

Background: In 2021, the California Department of Public Health Healthcare-Associated Infections Program developed new infection prevention and control (IPC) training for skilled nursing facility (SNF) certified nursing assistants (CNAs), as part of the CDC Project Firstline. CNAs comprise approximately one-third of SNF healthcare personnel (HCP) nationwide; ~50,000 CNAs are employed in California SNFs. Despite making up a large proportion of direct care HCP, CNAs can frequently lack understanding of fundamental IPC practices, including hand hygiene and appropriate personal protective equipment use. We conducted a learning needs assessment for SNF can and leadership to understand and design our program to mecanCNA IPC training needs and preferences. Methods: We distributed the learning needs assessment via SurveyMonkey in English and Spanish with questions regarding current IPC practices and challenges, as well as preferred training delivery methods and posttraining support. We leveraged partnershipscanth CNA-affiliated organizations to engage CNAs throughout California. Results: Of 193 respondents, 80 (41%) were CNAs and 113 (59%) were leadership staff, representing 97 SNFs in 41 local health jurisdictions. Among CNAs, 34 (43%) believed that they had to do workarounds in their IPC practice and 18 (23%) stated that they would benefit from one-on-one question-and-answer sessions with an infection prevention expert. Also, 50 (63%) selected visual learning, 34 selected (43%) in-person learning, and 30 (38%) selected live or online trainings as their preferred learning style and training method. Most CNAs stated that they were most comfortable listening and speaking (73%) and reading (76%) in English only, followed by listening and speaking (16%) and reading (13%) in English and Spanish. For posttraining support, CNAs preferred access to online training materials (75%), digital materials (68%), virtual office hours with IPC educators (53%), and regular webinars (49%). Conclusions: The results of our learning needs assessment confirm the need for accessible IPC training and materials and continued engagement with posttraining support for CNAs. We will continue to provide online training and resources, access to IPC experts including an ‘AskBox’ for CNAs to e-mail IPC questions or request one-on-one support, and monthly office hours. Even though most CNAs are comfortable with training in English only, we will translate curricula into Spanish to support our bilingual Spanish-canaking CNA population. We are developing a tool kit to support SNFs and local health jurisdictions interested in providing their own training using our materials, and we will offer icanerson CNA training. We will use our experience from this process in future learning needs assessments to inform other frontline HCP training, including for SNF environmental services staff.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Experiences of nurses responding to the COVID-19 outbreak at a long-term care hospital in Korea: A qualitative study
Authors: Kim EunJo , Kang JaHyun 
Published: May 2022

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic revealed the fundamental vulnerability of long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) related to infection control and prevention (ICP). We examined the experiences of nurses who worked at a hospital where a COVID-19 outbreak occurred from February 24 to March 16, 2021. Method: This qualitative research was performed with 9 nurses who were engaged during the COVID-19 outbreak. We prepared a semistructured questionnaire based on the main question, “How was the experience among the nurses during the outbreak, and what difficulties did they encounter while resolving the situation?” The data were collected through in-depth, individual interviews from May to August 2021 after the approval of the institutional review board, and the results were analyzed thematically. Results: The average age of the participants was 52.1 years, and they had an average of 15.2 years of clinical experience. We extracted 4 themes and 16 subthemes from the results. The first theme, “sudden onset of the outbreak,” included the following subthemes: (1) found myself accustomed to COVID-19 and desensitized; (2) unavoidable occurrence despite compliance with ICP guidelines; (3) LTCHs are gradually recognized as a breeding ground for COVID-19 by the public; and (4) fear of spreading the infection in the hospital and of becoming a spreader. The second theme, “heavier workload,” included (1) daily overtime and extra shifts in violation of self-quarantine recommendations due to the shortage of nurses; (2) a barrage of phone calls from family members, other departments, public health centers, and hospitals where confirmed cases were transferred; (3) nursing assistants and private caregivers who do not have ICP knowledge as well as patients who do not cooperate due to cognitive impairment; and (4) accomplishing additional tasks while wearing personal protective equipment with some suffocation. The third theme, “emotions and lessons,” included (1) unsatisfied with the initial responses; (2) awareness of the entire infectious disease; (3) increased compassion and attachment for patients; and (4) take pride in the job and the profession as a nurse. The fourth theme, “necessary support and attention,” included (1) need to install isolation rooms and replenish infection control supplies; (2) need for ICP specialists in LTCHs; (3) need for continuous national-based monitoring on ICP for LTCHs; and (4) need to improve working environment and acknowledge nurses in LTCHs. Conclusions: Overall, participants expressed their experiences with the insufficient infection control and response system toward COVID-19 in the LTCH. To enhance ICP in LTCHs, customized policies, regulations, and financial support for infection control activities and ICP professionals must be established.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Inpatient point-prevalence screening of New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)–producing Enterobacaterales and Candida auris
Authors: Greco Christian , Smith Heather , Fearon Candice , Flaherty Jennifer , Kendrick Simona , Malcolm Kimberly , McGinnis Marcy , Shah Manisha , Banjoko Kadiatu , Zedek Anjali , Smyer Justin , Day Shandra , Colburn Nora , Liscynesky Christina , Haden Michael 
Published: May 2022

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are an increasing threat to patient safety but only a small percentage of CRE identified are NDMs. Since 2018, clinical CRE isolates have been submitted to the Ohio Department of Health for sequencing and NDM cases have notably increased since that time. Candida auris is an emerging pathogen with similar risk factors for colonization as CRE. Methods: A point-prevalence study was initiated after an index patient was identified with NDM CRE infection or colonization during their inpatient admission. Two patient populations were included in the study: current patients on the same unit as the index patient and currently hospitalized patients who overlapped on any unit with the index patient for at least 72 hours. Patients had perirectal screening for CRE (via PCR) and axilla or groin screening for C. auris (via Xpert Carba-R Assay). Patients were excluded if they had been discharged, expired, or refused testing. Results: We completed 5 point-prevalence studies from March 21, 2021, to October 15, 2021. The index patients were admitted at different times and across 2 campuses including medical, cardiac, and surgical ICUs as well as medical-surgical and inpatient rehabilitation units. Moreover, 3 species of NDM were identified from urine and 2 species were identified from bronchoalveolar lavage: Enterobacter hormaechei, Citrobacter freundii, and Enterobacter cloacae complex. C. freundii and E. cloacae complex both had dual mechanisms of NDM and KPC. Although some of the index patients overlapped temporally within the health system, none overlapped in the same unit or building. None of the patients had recently received health care outside the United States, although 1 patient had emigrated from Togo >5 years prior and 4 had had prior local healthcare exposure within 12 months of admission. Also, 147 patients were identified for screening; 105 consented, 32 declined, and 10 were excluded due to being discharged, deceased, or unable to consent. Inpatient point-prevalence screening tests for all patients tested (n = 105) were negative for NDM CRE and C. auris. Conclusions: Despite an increase of inpatients with NDM CRE, evidence of patient-to-patient transmission was not identified, likely resulting from adherence to standard precautions. The diversity of species and lack of international travel suggests that these patients likely acquired NDM CRE from a local reservoir in the community or healthcare settings. Given the continued increase in NDM CRE without traditional risk factors, it is critical for hospitals and public health agencies to collaborate to identify these organisms and that they develop surveillance programs to clarify risk factors for colonization.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Increases in methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection incidence, 2016–2019
Authors: Jackson Kelly , Nadle Joelle , Ray Susan , Lynfield Ruth , Dumyati Ghinwa , Tracy Marissa , Schaffner William , Ham David , See Isaac 
Published: May 2022

Background: Incidence of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) in the United States during 2012–2017 has been reported to have been stable for hospital-onset BSIs and to have increased 3.9% per year for community-onset BSIs. We sought to determine whether these trends continued in more recent years and whether there were further differences within subgroups of community-onset BSIs. Methods: We analyzed CDC Emerging Infections Program active, population- and laboratory-based surveillance data during 2016–2019 for MSSA BSIs from 8 counties in 5 states. BSI cases were defined as isolation of MSSA from blood in a surveillance area resident. Cases were considered hospital onset (HO) if culture was obtained >3 days after hospital admission and healthcare-associated community-onset (HACO) if culture was obtained on or after day 3 of hospitalization and was associated with dialysis, hospitalization, surgery, or long-term care facility residence within 1 year prior or if a central venous catheter was present ≤2 days prior. Cases were otherwise considered community-associated (CA). Annual rates per 100,000 census population were calculated for each epidemiologic classification; rates of HACO cases among chronic dialysis patients per 100,000 dialysis patients were calculated using US Renal Data System data. Annual increases were modeled using negative binomial or Poisson regression and accounting for changes in the overall population age group, and sex. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results: Overall, 8,344 MSSA BSI cases were reported. From 2016–2019 total MSSA BSI rates increased from 23.9 per 100,000 to 28.5 per 100,000 (6.6% per year; P < .01). MSSA BSI rates also increased significantly among all epidemiologic classes. HO cases increased from 2.5 per 100,000 to 3.2 per 100,000 (7.9% per year; P = .01). HACO cases increased from 12.7 per 100,000 to 14.7 per 100,000 (7.0% per year; P = .01). CA cases increased from 8.4 per 100,000 to 10.4 per 100,000 (6.7% per year; P < .01) (Fig. 1). Significant increases in MSSA BSI rates were also observed for nondialysis HACO cases (9.3 per 100,000 to 11.1 per 100,000; 7.8% per year; P < .01) but not dialysis HACO cases (1,823.2 per 100,000 to 1,857.4 per 100,000; 1.4% per year; P = .59). Healthcare risk factors for HACO cases were hospitalization in the previous year (82%), surgery (31%), dialysis (27%), and long-term care facility residence (19%). Conclusions: MSSA BSI rates increased from 2016–2019 overall, among all epidemiologic classes, and among nondialysis HACO cases. Efforts to prevent MSSA BSIs among individuals with healthcare risk factors, particularly those related to hospitalization, might have an impact on MSSA BSI rates.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Findings from healthcare-associated infections data validation attestation in California general acute-care hospitals
Authors: Barahmani Nadia , Parriott Andrea , Epson Erin , Tang Genie , Kazerouni N. Neely 
Published: May 2022

Background: Accurate and complete hospital healthcare-associated infection (HAI) data are essential to inform facility-level HAI prevention efforts and to ensure the validity and reliability of annual public reports. We implemented a validation attestation survey to assess and improve the HAI data reported by California hospitals via NHSN. Methods: The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) HAI Program invited all 401 general acute-care hospitals in California to participate in an annual HAI validation attestation survey in 2021. The survey was designed to be completed by the person with primary responsibility for HAI surveillance and reporting consistent with NHSN protocols and California laws. Survey questions addressed HAI reporting knowledge and practices and surgical procedures performed, and they included 3 hypothetical scenarios evaluating hospital application of HAI surveillance, decision making, and reporting methods. Results: We received responses from 345 hospitals (86%). For the 3 hypothetical scenarios, 171 hospitals (49.6%) correctly answered all 3 questions, 110 hospitals (31.9%) answered 2 questions correctly, 52 (15.1%) hospitals answered 1 question correctly, and 12 hospitals (3.5%) answered zero questions correctly. We did not detect a statistically significant association between facility type (ie, acute-care hospital, critical access hospital, long-term acute-care hospital, or rehabilitation hospital or unit) and the probability of getting all questions correct (Fisher exact P = .42). Of the 303 hospitals (88.0%) that perform at least 1 of the 28 surgical procedures reportable in California, 269 (88.8%) apply CDPH-recommended postoperative ICD-10 diagnosis flag codes to identify records that might indicate a possible surgical site infection (SSI). Moreover, ~289 (84.0%) hospitals confirmed that someone at their facility reviews CDPH quality assurance–quality control reports to verify the accuracy and completeness of their hospital’s reported HAI data. In 321 hospitals (93.0%) decisions about which infections are reported to NHSN are made solely by the infection preventionists or hospital epidemiologists, who are thoroughly familiar and follow NHSN protocol, definitions, and criteria. Conclusions: Most hospitals reported following best practices for evaluating records for SSIs; however, only half responded correctly to all 3 hypothetical scenarios. Our results highlight the need for ongoing education on HAI surveillance, decision making and reporting methods, and external HAI data validation in hospitals. This survey could serve as a model for other states that work with hospitals to improve HAI surveillance data and to ensure the integrity of public reports. Future research will link the results of this survey to NHSN validation audits.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination in COVID-19 patient rooms in a VA medical center
Authors: Gibson Kristen , Ridenour Jennifer , Carver Kyle , Mantey Julia , Deng Jane , Mody Lona 
Published: May 2022

Background: SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19 infection, can significantly contaminate environmental surfaces and can remain viable on surfaces for up to 9 days. Although respiratory route remains the most significant mode of transmission, fomites and environmental sources of infection remain a concern for healthcare personnel who are working in dedicated COVID-19 units. We investigated the extent of detectable SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the environment of COVID-19 patients at a single VA hospital, with the intent of identifying potential high-touch surfaces at risk for viral contamination, which could be used to inform the development of simple COVID-19 prevention strategies. Methods: We conducted a cohort study at 1 VA hospital in a unit housing adult veterans admitted with COVID-19 between October and December 2020. In total, 11 swab specimens were collected for PCR analysis (SARS-CoV-2 env gene) from environmental surfaces inside and just outside the rooms of COVID-19 patients one time. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted to provide the SARS-CoV-2 epidemiologic context for environmental detection. Results: In total, 297 swabs were collected from the unit and environmental areas surrounding 27 hospitalized patients: average age, 72.5 years (range, 34–94); 100% male; 92% non-Hispanic white; average comorbidities, 1.8 (SD, 1.1). Of 297 swabs, 80 (27%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 19 (70%) of 27 patients had at least 1 positive site. The most contaminated site was the floor just outside the patient room (78% positive samples), followed by the patient’s bedrail (37%) and chair handle (37%) (Fig. 1). Traditionally high-touch surfaces, such as the door handle (outside patient room) and the light switch, did not have high positivity rates (<15%). Interestingly, both the personal protective equipment (PPE) cart outside patient’s room (33%) and the double doors leading out of the unit (19%) were positive, which are surfaces often touched with bare hands after handwashing. Analyses of clinical data are underway to examine whether specific care needs, based on activities of daily living disability, comorbidities, and clinical presentation of COVID-19, predict SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination. Conclusions: The presence of environmental contamination by SARS-CoV-2 highlights the importance of transmission via direct or indirect contact. Studies targeting high-risk populations are needed to better understand the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 between infected patients and their environment. Our findings also suggest that handwashing and attention to using disinfecting wipes may mitigate the risk of transmission of virus from surfaces that one might consider safe to touch.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Clinical factors associated with antibiotic de-escalation after a positive multiplex molecular respiratory panel
Authors: Baghdadi Jonathan , Morgan Daniel , Harris Anthony , Goodman Katherine 
Published: May 2022

Background: Under ideal circumstances, multiplex molecular respiratory panels can support early all discontinuation of unnecessary antibiotics by facilitating diagnosis of viral infection. Our goal was to identify clinic situations in which a positive respiratory panel was associated with antibiotic de-escalation. We focused on gram-negative antibiotics in recognition of the urgent threat posed by gram-negative resistance. Methods: The sample included hospitalized adults tested by respiratory panel while receiving gram-negative antibiotics at the University of Maryland Medical Center from 2015 to 2020. Only the first respiratory panel performed during hospitalization was included. The primary outcome was the combination of a positive result on respiratory panel indicating detection of a viral pathogen and de-escalation of gram-negative antibiotics. De-escalation was assessed based on antibiotics administered on day 3 after testing and was defined by discontinuation or switch to an agent with a narrower spectrum of activity. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to construct the multivariable logistic regression model. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify subgroups with a higher likelihood of the primary outcome. Results: Of 8,326 patients, 1,462 (17.6%) tested positive by respiratory panel. The most common pathogen was rhinovirus (7.9% of the sample). Gram-negative–targeted antibiotics were de-escalated in 4,456 cases (53.5% of the sample), including 887 patients with a positive result on respiratory panel indicating a viral pathogen (60.7% of patients with a positive viral result). LASSO regression was used to select 12 variables (Table 1). Admitting diagnosis of pneumonia (OR, 1.42), comorbid substance abuse (OR, 1.39), chronic pulmonary disease (OR, 1.39), and admission from home (OR, 1.34) were associated with antibiotic de-escalation in conjunction with a positive respiratory panel. Leukocytosis (OR, 0.59), hematologic malignancy (OR, 0.64), mechanical ventilation at time of testing (OR, 0.68), and hypotension (OR, 0.77) were associated with decreased likelihood of antibiotic de-escalation in conjunction with a positive respiratory panel. CART analysis identified patients tested within 40 hours of admission as having a higher likelihood of a positive result in conjunction with antibiotic de-escalation. Among patients tested within 40 hours of admission, the probability of a positive result followed by antibiotic de-escalation was 11.9% (95% CI, 11.1%–12.8%). For patients tested >40 hours after admission, the probability was 6.0% (95% CI, 4.8%–7.2%). Conclusions: Targeted use of respiratory panel testing may increase the likelihood of an informative result that can drive decision making related to antibiotic use. Our exploratory analysis suggests that respiratory panel testing in the first 2 daysFunding: NoneDisclosures: None