bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Trial in progress: Phase 1b/3 study of bemarituzumab + mFOLFOX6 + nivolumab versus mFOLFOX6 + nivolumab in previously untreated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer with FGFR2b overexpression (FORTITUDE-102).
Authors: Wainberg Zev A. , Van Cutsem Eric , Moehler Markus H. , Kang Yoon-Koo , Yen Priscilla , Finger Elizabeth , Keegan Alissa , Shitara Kohei 
Published: June 2022

TPS4165 Background: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b) is overexpressed in approximately 30% of non-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (non-HER2) positive gastric cancer (Wainberg, 2021). Bemarituzumab is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks FGFR2b, inhibiting downstream tumor proliferation and enhancing antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (Catenacci, 2020; Xiang, 2021). In the phase 2 FIGHT study (Wainberg, 2021; Catenacci, 2021), progression-free survival (PFS) was improved (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.44-1.04; p = 0.07) and a 5.7 month longer median overall survival (OS) was observed (19.2 months vs 13.5 months; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94) with bemarituzumab + mFOLFOX6 vs placebo + mFOLFOX6. Preclinical studies indicate that bemarituzumab modulates the tumor microenvironment to sensitize tumors to anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies (Powers, 2016; Xiang, 2021) providing rationale for combination with nivolumab. Methods: FORTITUDE-102 (NCT05111626) is a phase 1b/3 study in patients (pts) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma not amenable to curative therapy. Part 1 is an open-label safety lead-in; Part 2 is a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate efficacy and safety. Approximately 702 pts ≥18 years will be enrolled (Part 1, ̃20; Part 2, ̃682). Key eligibility criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, evaluable disease per RECIST v1.1, adequate hematologic and organ function, and no contraindication to receive mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy or nivolumab; for part 2, IHC-confirmed FGFR2b overexpression by central testing is required and no prior treatment for metastatic or unresectable disease allowed except 1 dose of mFOLFOX6 ± nivolumab. Key exclusion criteria include positive HER2 status and untreated or symptomatic CNS metastasis and leptomeningeal disease. Pts on bemarituzumab will receive 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) with an additional 7.5 mg/kg dose on cycle 1 day 8. mFOLFOX6 + nivolumab will be at a fixed dose Q2W. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period is 28 days; observed safety data will influence additional enrollment to Part 1, de-escalation of bemarituzumab, or the recommended phase 3 dose (RP3D). For Part 1, primary endpoints are DLTs and adverse events; secondary endpoints include OS, PFS, and objective response (OR). For Part 2, pts will be randomized 1:1 to mFOLFOX6 + nivolumab Q2W plus either bemarituzumab at RP3D or placebo. Primary endpoint for Part 2 is OS; secondary endpoints include PFS, OR, and safety. The concurrent phase 3 FORTITUDE-101 study (NCT05052801) will evaluate bemarituzumab + mFOLFOX6 vs placebo + mFOLFOX6. Clinical trial information: NCT05111626.
PROOF 301: A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial of infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with an FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement.
Authors: Abou-Alfa Ghassan K. , Borbath Ivan , Goyal Lipika , Lamarca Angela , Macarulla Teresa , Oh Do-Youn , Roychowdhury Sameek , Sadeghi Saeed , Shroff Rachna T. , Li Ai , Soto Jose , Avogadri Francesca , Dambkowski Carl L. , Javle Milind M. 
Published: June 2022

TPS4171 Background: First-line treatment options are limited for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Genetic alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor ( FGFR) gene play an important role in CCA. FGFR gene fusions/rearrangements are present in 10–16% of intrahepatic CCA and may predict tumor sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors. Infigratinib (BGJ398) is a potent, orally bioavailable, selective, ATP-competitive, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of FGFRs that showed promising clinical activity and a manageable adverse event profile in a phase 2 study in patients with previously treated, unresectable locally advanced/metastatic CCA with an FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement. The multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase 3 PROOF 301 trial is evaluating infigratinib vs standard-of-care gemcitabine + cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic or inoperable CCA with an FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement. Methods: Approximately 300 patients ≥18 years of age with histologically or cytologically confirmed, advanced/metastatic or inoperable CCA with an FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement (confirmed by central laboratory) are randomized 2:1 to oral infigratinib 125 mg once daily for the first 21 days of a 28-day treatment cycle vs intravenous standard gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) + cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Randomization will be stratified by unresectable locally advanced vs metastatic disease, geographic region, prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment vs none, and receipt of up to 1 cycle of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic disease prior to randomization vs none. Treatment will continue until confirmed progressive disease by blinded independent central review (BICR), intolerance, withdrawal of informed consent, or death. Patients on the gemcitabine + cisplatin arm who develop disease progression, confirmed by BICR, can cross-over to receive infigratinib. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS, RECIST v1.1), confirmed by BICR. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, PFS (investigator determined), overall response rate, best overall response, disease control rate, duration of response (BICR and investigator determined), and the type, frequency, and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. PFS after subsequent therapy (PFS2), quality of life, pharmacokinetics and other exploratory genetic alterations/biomarkers will also be evaluated. Trial enrollment is ongoing in the US, EU, and APAC (including Australia). The Data Monitoring Committee last reviewed the trial in December 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT03773302.
A phase I trial to evaluate the biologic effect of CBM588 (Clostridium butyricum) in combination with cabozantinib plus nivolumab for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
Authors: Meza Luis A , Malhotra Jasnoor , Zengin Zeynep Busra , Dizman Nazli , Hsu Joann , Chawla Neal Shiv , Chehrazi-Raffle Alex , Muddasani Ramya , Govindarajan Ameish , Castro Daniela V. , Dorff Tanya B. , Lyou Yung , Frankel Paul Henry , Pal Sumanta K. 
Published: June 2022

TPS4606 Background: Combination therapy with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) nivolumab (nivo) and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib (cabo) is a new standard of care for first line treatment of patients with clear cell mRCC. However, despite the improved clinical benefit obtained with this regimen, a subgroup of patients still presents with progressive disease as best response (Choueiri et al NEJM 2021). There is now evidence supporting the role of the gut microbiome in mediating ICI activity (Routy et al Science 2018) and certain bacterial species, such as Bifidobacterium spp. in predisposing clinical response in patients with mRCC receiving ICIs (Salgia et al Eur Urol 2020). Moreover, recent evidence from a phase I clinical trial suggests that the addition of CBM588, a live probiotic comprised primarily of Clostridium butyricum, can enhance clinical response in patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab without incurring added toxicity (Meza et al ASCO, 2021). Herein we present the study design of an ongoing phase I study evaluating the biological effect of CBM588 in combination with cabozantinib plus nivolumab in patients with mRCC. Methods: This is an open label, randomized, single institution phase 1 trial for patients with confirmed mRCC with clear cell, papillary, or sarcomatoid components, who have not received prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease. A total of 30 eligible patient will be randomized 1:2 to receive either cabo/nivo at the standard dose/schedule (40mg PO QD and 480mg IV /4wks, respectively) alone or with CBM588 dosed at 80mg PO bid. The primary objective of the study is to determine the biologic effect of CBM588 with cabo/nivo in the modulation of the gut microbiome. This will be done by assessing the changes in Bifidobacterium spp. abundance and Shannon index (a measure of microbiome diversity) in stool specimens. Stool will be collected for bacteriomic profiling at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Metagenomic sequencing will be performed using previously published methods (Dizman et al Cancer Med 2020). Secondary objectives include determining the effect of CBM588 on (1) clinical efficacy, through overall survival, response rate, and progression-free survival; (2) systemic immunomodulation, through assessment of changes in circulating Tregs, circulating cytokines/chemokines, etc; and (3) toxicities. A two-group t-test with a one-sided type I error of 0.05 will be used to assess the study primary endpoint. Clinical trial information: NCT05122546 .
ANTICIPATE: A phase I/II, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral APL-1202 in combination with tislelizumab compared to tislelizumab alone as neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Authors: Galsky Matt D. , Sfakianos John P. , Ye Ding-Wei , Zhang Mingming 
Published: June 2022

TPS4613 Background: Standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is radical cystectomy (RC) and administration of NAC in patients who are eligible to receive cisplatin. Approximately 50% of patients are ineligible to receive cisplatin as a result of pre-existing contraindications, and some refuse to receive any chemotherapy due to concerns of toxicities. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to be highly active in metastatic urothelial cancer. APL-1202 (nitroxoline) is a reversible and orally available MetAP2 inhibitor with anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activities. Synergistic effects of APL-1202 and ICIs have been shown in model systems of bladder cancer. It is hypothesized that APL-1202 in combination with tislelizumab, a humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 MAb, may be an effective neoadjuvant therapy in MIBC. This trial will evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamic effects of APL-1202 in combination with tislelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with MIBC who are cisplatin ineligible or refuse cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Methods: ANTICIPATE is an open-label, multi-center clinical trial enrolling 79 patients in two phases: Phase Ⅰ and Phase Ⅱ. Phase I is a dose escalation study to determine MTD (maximum tolerated dose) and/or RP2D. Phase II is an expanded proof-of-concept study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of APL-1202 in combination with tislelizumab compared to tislelizumab alone as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC as measured by pathological complete response (pCR). Phase Ⅰ and Phase Ⅱ both are divided into 3 periods: screening period of 4 weeks, neoadjuvant therapy comprising 3 cycles (each 21 days) prior to radical cystectomy; and a follow-up period of up to 90 days after surgery. The phase Ⅰ will determine the RP2D of APL-1202 in combination with tislelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC. Eligible patients have newly diagnosed MIBC and are cisplatin ineligible or refuse cisplatin-based NAC and are planned for RC. In phase Ⅰ, a standard 3+3 dose-escalation design will be used. On day 1 of each cycle, a single dose of 200 mg tislelizumab will be administered intravenously. The daily dose APL-1202 will be escalated in successive cohorts (375 mg à 750 mg à 1,125 mg). The DLT observation window for any dose level will be treatment cycle 1. There will be no intra-patient dose escalation. In phase II patients will be randomly assigned to group 1 (APL-1202 + tislelizumab) or group 2 (tislelizumab only), stratified by PD-L1 expression. The IND has been approved by FDA and NMPA, and the study execution is under preparation both in US and China. Clinical trial information: NCT04813107.
A phase 2 study of cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab as neoadjuvant treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HCRN GU18-343) ABATE study.
Authors: Kilari Deepak , Szabo Aniko , Tripathi Abhishek , Paul Asit K. , Alter Robert S. , Bylow Kathryn A. , Nelson Ariel Ann , Hall William A. , Langenstroer Peter , Jacobsohn Kenneth , Rini Brian I. , Van Veldhuizen Peter J. , Johnson Scott , Davis Nancy B. , Fung Chunkit , Milowsky Matthew I. 
Published: June 2022

TPS4618 Background: ABACUS and PURE-01 trials demonstrated the activity of single agent atezolizumab and pembrolizumab respectively as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC). However, downstaging to non-muscle invasive disease was noted in only 50 percent of patients. Resistance to programmed death (PD)- 1/L1 antibodies is likely to include factors such as impaired dendritic cell maturation/function, infiltration of T-Regs and myeloid derived suppressor cells, impaired T-cell priming and T-cell trafficking in tumors. Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor which targets MET, AXL, MER, Tyro3 and VEGFR2. Cabozantinib has a unique immunomodulatory profile and has demonstrated clinical activity as monotherapy and in combination with PD-1/L1 antibodies in various solid tumors including urothelial cancer (UC), renal cell, castrate- resistant prostate and non-small cell lung cancer. We hypothesize that the combination of cabozantinib and atezolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC would improve rates of pathologic downstaging compared to single-agent checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: ABATE is an open-label, single arm, multi-center study to assess the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib with atezolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for cT2-T4aN0/xM0 MIBC. An estimated 42 patients will be enrolled to obtain 38 evaluable patients, and the study will have over 80% power to declare the investigational combination to be successful using a Bayesian evaluation at 90% posterior probability cutoff, if the response probability is 59%, i.e., 20% higher than the 39% response rate with the single agent atezolizumab. Eligible patients will receive cabozantinib 40 mg PO daily with atezolizumab 1200mg every 3 weeks for a total duration of 9 weeks (3 cycles) followed by radical cystectomy. Adults (≥18 years) with resectable MIBC who are either cisplatin-ineligible or decline cisplatin-based chemotherapy are eligible. Patients are required to have an ECOG PS of 0-2 and provide tumor tissue for PD-L1 expression analysis. UC should be predominant component (≥ 50%). Previous systemic anticancer therapies for MIBC are not permitted. CT/MRI will be performed before investigational therapy and cystectomy. Primary endpoint is pathologic response rate defined as the absence of residual muscle-invasive cancer in the surgical specimen (< pT2). Secondary endpoints are safety and toxicity, pathologic complete response rate and event-free survival. Exploratory end points include patient-reported outcomes and outcome associations with biomarkers. Accrual began May 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04289779.
CCTG BL13 a randomized phase II trial assessing trimodality therapy with or without adjuvant durvalumab to treat patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NCT03768570).
Authors: Kassouf Wassim , Crabb Simon J. , Duran Ignacio , Brundage Michael Donald , Reaume M. Neil , Dragomir Alice , Wyatt Alexander William , Vera Badillo Francisco Emilio , Lukka Himu , Niazi Tamim , Souhami Luis , Sridhar Srikala S. , Griffiths Gareth Owen , Howell Doris , Richardson Harriet , Djurfeldt Marina , Ding Keyue , Parulekar Wendy R. 
Published: June 2022

TPS4619 Background: Immunotherapy improves outcomes in the advanced (Bellmunt 2019; Powles 2020) as well as in the adjuvant setting post cystectomy (Bajorin 2021) for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients. Trimodality treatment (TMT) consisting of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may be considered an alternative to radical cystectomy in MIBC. The role of radiotherapy and chemotherapy as immune system stimulants provides a rationale to evaluate the anticancer activity of checkpoint inhibitors in this patient population. Durvalumab, an anti PDL1 inhibitor, administered after CRT leads to improvement in PFS and OS in patients with locally advanced NSCLC, which further supports the rationale for this study (Antonia 2017, 2018). We hypothesized that durvalumab will improve outcomes in patients with MIBC when administered in the adjuvant setting after completion of trimodality therapy. Methods: CCTG BL13 is a Canadian Cancer Trials Group, randomized phase II trial in patients with stage T2-T4a N0M0, urothelial carcinoma treated with TURBT followed by radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Treatment arms consist of durvalumab 1500 mg IV q 4 weeks for 12 months versus surveillance. The primary objective: to compare disease free survival (DFS) between arms (RECIST 1.1, investigator assessed). Secondary endpoints include a non muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrence rate (< T2); locoregional control rate; overall survival; bladder intact DFS, patterns of disease recurrence; metastasis free survival; safety; quality of life ; economics evaluation. A pilot sub study (BL13F) has been activated and will evaluate the feasibility of electronic real-time patient self-reporting of immunotherapy related symptomatic adverse events using the SYMPTOM-IQ Tool on the uMotif Mobile Health Application (APP). Statistical Design: Randomization 1:1 balanced for stratification factors: ECOG PS; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; radiation field extent; T2 vs T3/T4; centre. Assuming a 2-year DFS rate 65% for patients on the control arm and estimated 12% improvement in the 2-year DFS rate (65% to 77% (HR 0.61)) with 80% power using a 1-sided 10% level test requires a sample size of 190 including 5% drop out rate. Conduct to Date: Study activation Dec 2018. Enrollment as of January 31 2022: 49. The DSMC reviewed and recommended trial continuation in November 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT03768570.
TALAPRO-3: A phase 3, double-blind, randomized study of enzalutamide (ENZA) plus talazoparib (TALA) versus placebo plus ENZA in patients with DDR gene–mutated, metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).
Authors: Agarwal Neeraj , Saad Fred , Azad Arun , Mateo Joaquin , Matsubara Nobuaki , Shore Neal D. , Chakrabarti Jayeta , Chen Hsiang-Chun , Lanzalone Silvana , Niyazov Alexander , Fizazi Karim 
Published: June 2022

TPS5096 Background: TALA is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) approved as monotherapy for germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Clinical efficacy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPC) with alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) genes involved directly or indirectly in homologous recombination repair (HRR) has been demonstrated with some PARPi. Phase 3 study findings (de Bono et al. N Engl J Med, 2020;382:2091-2102) resulted in the approval of olaparib for mCRPC. ENZA is an androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor and established therapy for mCSPC. Since PARP activity has been shown to support AR function, PARP inhibition may increase sensitivity to AR-directed therapies. In addition, AR blockade downregulates HRR gene regulation, which has been hypothesized to induce a “ BRCAness” phenotype. A Phase 2 study of TALA monotherapy (TALAPRO-1) demonstrated robust antitumor activity in men with heavily pretreated, HRR-mutated mCRPC. The Phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial TALAPRO-3 (NCT04821622) herein presented will compare the combination of TALA plus ENZA vs placebo plus ENZA in men with mCSPC with DDR/HRR alterations. Methods: Approximately 550 patients with mCSPC harboring DDR/HRR alterations will be randomized to TALA (0.5 mg once daily) plus ENZA (160 mg once daily) or placebo (once daily) plus ENZA (160 mg once daily). Patients will be stratified according to de novo mCSPC vs relapsed mCSPC, high-volume disease vs low-volume disease, where high-volume disease is defined as the presence of visceral metastases or ≥4 bone lesions with ≥1 beyond the vertebral bodies and pelvis and BRCA vs non-BRCA mutational status. Key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years; histological diagnosis of prostate cancer; alterations in at least one of 12 DDR/HRR genes known to sensitize patients to PARPi ( ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C); and metastatic disease (no brain metastases). Primary endpoint is rPFS (time to radiographic progression in soft tissue per RECIST 1.1 or in bone per PCWG3 criteria by investigator, or death). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Patient recruitment is planned at approximately 285 sites in 27 countries, including the US and Europe, South America, South Africa, and Asia-Pacific. This study was approved by an Institutional Review Board. Clinical trial information: NCT04821622.
177Lu-DOTA-TLX591 safety, biodistribution and dosimetry study (ProstACT-SELECT).
Authors: Antonini Paola , Meyrick Danielle , Hayward Colin 
Published: June 2022

TPS5109 Background: The cell surface glycoprotein prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has proven to be an ideal therapeutic target in prostate cancer (PC) as it is highly expressed by malignant prostate cells.1,2 177Lu-DOTA-HuJ591-CHO (TLX591) is a radioimmunoconjugate comprised of the humanized IgG1 mAb rosopatamab, linked to the low energy beta-emitting radioisotope lutetium-177 (177Lu) via the bifunctional chelating agent DOTA-NHS ester. Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell line has been selected for the manufacture of the recombinant mAb. There is a strong rationale for investigation of TLX591 as a potential radioligand therapy for the treatment of PC, supported by previous clinical evidence of the safety of the antibody, as unconjugated and as a DOTA conjugate, and of the specificity of the antibody for PC tumors. 3,4,5,6. This multicenter Phase 1 radiomics study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04786847) is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, biodistribution and dosimetry of TLX591 administered with best SoC to patients with PSMA-expressing, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing despite prior treatment with a novel androgen axis drug (NAAD). At the time of this abstract the study has commenced recruitment in Australia. This trial is sponsored by Telix Pharmaceuticals. Methods: The study will consist of 2 cohorts: Cohort 1: Five patients will be recruited for evaluation of biodistribution of TLX591 administered in combination with SoC. These patients will receive a single tracer (27 mCi) intravenous (IV) infusion of TLX591, and SPECT images and pharmacokinetic blood samples acquired at several time points until Day 13. A qualitative comparison of biodistribution of tracer level TLX591, as demonstrated by SPECT, with 68Ga-PSMA-11 on PET imaging will be performed to ensure equivalent (or improved) radiopharmaceutical tumour targeting. Dosimetry analysis will also be performed. If safety is confirmed by independent DSMB review, each individual patient in Cohort 1 will proceed 14 days following the initial tracer dose to a second administration of TLX591. SoC therapy will continue according to standard practice. Cohort 2: All further enrolled patients will receive two administrations of 76 mCi TLX591 for further evaluation of safety, tolerability and biodistribution, and efficacy in combination with SoC. 1. Pan M-H et al. 2009 2. Dorff TB et al., 2019 3. Tagawa, Milowsky et al., 2013 4. Tagawa et al., 2019 5. Tagawa, Whang et al., 2014 6. Niaz et al., 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04786847.