bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A psychometric study: The validation of a school quality assessment tool
Authors: Berbar H. , Lotfi S. , Essaoudi M. , Talbi M. 
Published: April 2022

Introduction.School evaluation is a complex process, and it is now a central priority for education systems with varied practices and multiple actors. It affects many aspects: teachers, institutions, training, management, educational policies, and design. Thus, it is necessary to think first about the regulation of the indicators that will serve as a system of valuation/sanction of the quality measured.Aim.The present researchaimsto construct a grid for evaluating pedagogical and administrative quality of secondary school. Furthermore, producing a quality evaluation system based on indicators to allow quality to be witnessed remains a challenge. We have optimized and validated a coherent evaluation system of indicators (School Quality Assessment System SEQES). It is based on rigorous scientific research, evaluating school quality and testing with 196 stakeholders (school administrators, teachers, educational inspectors, and planning).Research methodology and methods. The design and validation of this evaluation grid were carried out based on Churchill’s (1979) theory of measurement with a methodological process of numerous steps of analysis and emergent categorisation of items, scaling, refinement, and field testing.Results and scientific novelty. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was administered to 196 stakeholders and initially yielded 153 items from 289. They articulated qualitative steps (interviews with members of audit cells, techniques: Focus Group, TGN, TRIAGE) and quantitative (Exploratory Factor Analysis). The results made it possible to identify a scale of seven dimensions and fields of 37 items, considering theoretical, empirical, and methodological considerations.Practical significance. This measurement instrument is a toolbox that can be developed for decision-makers to establish a reference system for systematic external quality evaluation at the national level and a toolkit for inspectors and headteachers.
A pilot study to assess the efficacy of VCare predict in early detection of pressure ulcer
Authors: Bellarmin Edison , Ramasamy M. S. 
Published: April 2022

<p><strong>Background:</strong> The aim of the study to evaluate the efficiency of ‘VCare’ predict for early diagnosis of pressure ulcers/bedsores/pressure injury are a type of injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue leading to reddening of the skin to severe, deep craters with exposed muscle or bone necrosis. A pilot study was carried out to assess and compare efficacy of VCare predict and standard of care (SOC) in prediction of pressure ulcer among the high-risk patients being hospitalized.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> The 30 female or male subjects aged ˃60 years were selected with inform consent and enrolled in the study. The efficiency of VCare predict was evaluated by comparison of arm A (VCare predict) and arm B SOC. The sensor patch is placed under sacrum for 30 seconds. It captures key parameters and transfer to the mobile app thru blue-tooth. Mobile app receives measured data, and it shows the risk level of the patient (Red, Yellow and Green) to recommend the frequency of flip to predict the early diagnosis of severity of pressure ulcer.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The study results exemplified that efficiency of VCare predict which is more efficiently (with 31.4% lesser flips in Arm A) predict pressure injury leading to further complications.</p><p><strong> Conclusions: </strong>This study was concluded that VCare predict can be a highly effective risk assessment and mitigation tool in pressure ulcer management. With VCare predict, there was no adverse event found or experienced, hence it is a safer tool to use.</p>
Palliative care: Time for action
Authors: Mir Javaid Ahmad , Mushtaq Onaisa Aalia , Mushtaq Bushra 
Published: April 2022

Palliative care improves the life quality of client and also for their families who are suffering with challenges associated with life-threatening illness, whether physical, psychological, social or spiritual. The quality of caregiver’s life also improves. According to WHO each year, an estimated 40 million people are in need of palliative care; 78% of them people live in low- and middle-income countries. Worldwide, only about 14% of people who need palliative care currently receive it. Unnecessarily restrictive regulations for morphine and other essential controlled palliative medicines deny access to adequate palliative care.
Assess the level of stress and coping level among married working women in Kashmir
Authors: Amin Ulfat , Rasool Insha , Jan Rohi , Yousuf Rumysa , Mabool Shahnaz , Qadir Humaira 
Published: April 2022

Aim of this study was: 1. To assess the level of stress among Married Working Women as measured by Perceived stress scale 2. To determine the Level of coping among Married Working Women as assessed by Stress Coping Resources Inventory. 3. To find out the association between the level of stress and Level of Coping among Married Working Women with their selected demographic variables. 93 married working women, randomly selected were assessed by Standardized tool (Perceived Stress Scale and Stress Coping Resources Inventory) and demographic Variables. Online Survey method was adopted in order to collect data for a period of three months from 21 September 2021 to 21 December 2021.: Findings revealed that 72% of married working women had High Stress Level, 22% had Moderate Stress Level and only 6% had Low Stress Level. However, maximum (58%) married working women had above average Coping Level, 41% had average Coping Level, 1% had below average Coping Level and none had High Coping Level. Data analysis was performed using SV26|IBM SPSS Statistics 26. Chi- Square test & Unpaired t-Test was used to find out association of Level of stress and Level of Coping with selected demographic variables.Stress Level among working women is significantly high and there is significant association between Level of stress & Level of Coping among married working women. The results of the study proclaimed association was found between Age and Level of Coping among married working women. Whereas no association was found between other demographic variables and coping among married working women. After study, we conducted that Maximum of working women have High stress level and no one had high Coping level.
Poetični diskurz v romanih Pétra Esterházyja
Authors: Rudaš Jutka 
Published: April 2022

Razprava razgrinja poglavitne elemente poetičnega diskurza v delih Pétra Esterházyja. Avtorjeva celotna poetika namreč temelji na intertekstualnosti kot posebni literarnoumetniški strategiji ter na metaforični referenci, kjer je sama realnost v nekem smislu potencialno fiktivna in fantastična. Njegova dela so prežeta s prelomnimi razsežnosti medbesedilnosti, v katero je ujet vsak tekst, kjer je meja med znotraj- in zunajtekstualnim zabrisana, branje pa docela pretkano s citati, z referencami, z različnimi kulturnimi govoricami, družbeno-kulturnimi kodi. V labirintu fragmentov že omenjene citatnosti, avtoreferencialnosti, literarne aluzije, ki jih niza Esterházy stran za stranjo želim podrobneje prikazati to zapleteno mrežo prelomov in prehodov v njegovih romanih.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS DIMUSNAHKANNYA BARANG BUKTI PERKARA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh Nomor 55/Pid.B/2015/Pn.Bna)
Authors: Rochmah Hanum Ni’mahtul 
Published: April 2022

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus dimusnahkannya barang bukti dalam perkara pencurian dengan pemberatan telah sesuai dengan Pasal 194 ayat (1) KUHAP. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif atau terapan dengan pendekatan studi kasus.
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim terkait putusan nomor 55/Pid.B/2015/Pn.Bna yang mengabulkan tuntutan Penuntut Umum untuk dimusnahkannya barang bukti berupa 1 (satu) buah alat bong dan penghisap sabu telah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 194 ayat (1) KUHAP yang berisi bahwa terhadap putusan pemidanaan atau bebas atau lepas dari segala tuntutan hukum pengadilan dapat menetapkan supaya barang bukti yang disita diserahkan pada pemilik sahnya seperti yang ada dalam putusan kecuali jika menurut ketentuan undang-undang barang bukti tersebut harus dirampas untuk kepentingan Negara atau dimusnahkan atau dirusak sehingga tidak dapat dipergunakan lagi. Pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus dimusnahkannya 1 (satu) alat bong dan penghisap sabu ini berdasar pada Pasal 194 ayat (1) KUHAP dimana status barang bukti berupa alat bong dan penghisap sabu tersebut tergolong dalam benda terlarang atau dilarang untuk diedarkan sehingga sudah sepatutnya barang bukti tersebut dimusnahkan agar tidak disalahgunakan oleh pemiliknya.
Kata Kunci : Barang Bukti, Pertimbangan Hakim, Pencurian dengan Pemberatan
ALASAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PERKARA PERDAGANGAN ANAK (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 2401K/Pid.Sus/2014)
Authors: Nindita Listya Hira 
Published: April 2022

Penelitian hukum ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian alasan kasasi Penuntut Umum berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 253 ayat (1) KUHAP dalam perkara perdagangan anak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan sumber bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa Alasan kasasi Penuntut Umum terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 1809/Pid.Sus/2013/PN.Jkt.Bar tanggal 17 Desember 2013 telah sesuai dengan Pasal 253 ayat (1) huruf a KUHAP yang juga dibenarkan oleh Mahkamah Agung dalam Putusan Nomor 2401 K/Pid.Sus/2014, bahwa Judex Facti/ Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat tidak menerapkan atau menerapkan peraturan hukum yang tidak sebagaimana mestinya menjatuhkan putusan bebas tanpa memperhatikan fakta dan bukti dalam persidangan, bahwa Terdakwa TINI binti ATIM secara sah terbukti menurut hukum melanggar Pasal 88 Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak “Mengeksploitasi ekonomi atau seksual anak dengan maksud untuk menguntungkan diri sendiri atau orang lain”.
Kata Kunci: Perdagangan Anak, Kasasi, Penegakan Hukum.
TINJAUAN SAKSI VERBALISAN DALAM PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA (Studi Putusan Nomor : 2406/Pid.B/2014/PN.SBY)
Authors: Yanuar Rizky 
Published: April 2022

<p align="center"><strong>ABSTRAK</strong></p><p><em> Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui kekuatan pembuktian saksi verbalisan. Metode penelitian yang digubakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Berdasarkan pada hasil dan pembahasan maka diketahui saksi verbalisan adalah saksi penyidik yang berfungsi untuk menguji bantahan terdakwa atas kebenaran Pada dasarnya keterangan saksi verbalisan belum diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana maupun peraturan lain perundang-undangan lainnya di Indonesia. Dalam praktik hukum acara pidana, keberadaan saksi verbalisan banyak ditemui.Penuntut umum menghadirkan saksi verbalisan untuk membuktikan kesalahan terdakwa yang diharapkan dapat dijadikan pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara tindak pidana narkotika di Surabaya.Tujuan dari pembuktian yaitu memberi kepastian pada hakim tentang adanya suatu peristiwa atau perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh seseorang sehingga dapat dijadikan dasar dalam menjatuhkan putusan hakim kepada terdakwa tentang bersalah atau tidaknya sebagaimana yang telah didakwakan penuntut umum. Saksi hadir di persidangan, sehingga kesaksian diberikan secara langsung di persidangan, yang berarti bahwa keterangan saksi yang berisi tentang apa yang saksi dengar,melihat ,dan dialami sendiri mengenai suatu peristiwa pidana baru bernilai sebagai alat bukti</em><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Kata Kunci : Kesaksian Penyidik Polri, Kekuatan Pembuktian, Tindak Pidana</em></strong></p><p><strong><em> Narkotika</em></strong></p><p><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><strong> ABSTRACT</strong></p><p><em>The purpose of this paper is to find out strength of verifying witnesses verbally. The research method using normative research method, Based on result and discussion it is known verbalisan witnesses is investigative witnesses who function to test the defendant’s rebuttal to the truth. Basically the testimony of the verbalisan witnesses has not been regulated in Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law or other regulations in Indonesia. However, in the practice of criminal procedural law, the existence of verbal witnesses is common. The prosecutor presents a witness verbally to prove the defendant's mistake which is expected to be taken into consideration by the judge in deciding the case of narcotics crime in Surabaya. actions committed by a person so that it can be used as a basis for dropping a judge's decision on the defendant regarding guilt or not as charged by the public prosecutor.Witnesses were present at the court,so the testimony was given directly in court which meant that the witnesses testimony regarding what the witnesses heard, saw, and experienced by himself regarding a new criminal event was valuable as evidence.</em></p><p><strong><em> </em></strong></p><strong><em>Keyword : Evidence Investigators Police, Vindication, Narcotics crime</em></strong>
KEKUATAN HUKUM ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG SEDARAH DENGAN TERDAKWA DALAM PROSES PEMBUKTIAN DI PENGADILAN (Studi Putusan Nomor 132 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN.Smn)
Authors: Fauzie Fajar Ikhsan 
Published: April 2022

<p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong><strong><em></em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p><em>Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji kekuatan hukum alat bukti keterangan saksi sedarah yang merupakan anak dari pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan anggota keluarga, berdasarkan putusan nomor 132 / Pid.Sus / 2015/ PN.Smn. Saksi yang merupakan anak dari terdakwa dihadirkan dalam persidangan dan memberikan keterangan atas tindak pidana yang dilakukan ayah kandungnya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan peneliti adalah pendekatan kasus dengan sumber data yang diperoleh dari bahan hukum primer dan </em><em>bahan </em><em>sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui studi kasus. Bahan hukum diolah menggunakan metode s</em><em>i</em><em>logisme deduktif. Saksi yang merupakan anggota keluarga dari terdakwa memiliki kedudukan yang sama dengan saksi lainnya apabila dalam memberikan keterangan berdasarkan ketentuan dari KUHAP</em><em></em></p><p><strong><em>Kata Kunci: </em></strong><em>Alat Bukti, Persidangan, Kekuatan Hukum</em></p><p><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><em>This study aims to examine the legal strength of witness statements which are child of family member murder's perpetrator, based on decision number 132 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN.Smn. The witness who is the child of the defendant is presented at the trial and provides information on the criminal act committed by his biological father. This research is normative legal research. The approach used by researchers is a case approach with data sources obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. Techniques for collecting legal materials through case studies. Legal materials are processed using deductive syllogism methods. Witnesses who are families of defendants have the same position as other witnesses when providing information based on the provisions of the KUHAP.</em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords :</em></strong><em> Witness</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>Trial,</em><em> Legal Strength Of Witness</em><em></em></p><p> </p>
KAJIAN NILAI PEMBUKTIAN DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KESAKSIAN TUNGGAL KORBAN INSES DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 44/Pid.Sus/2016/PN.Byl
Authors: Extrada Mohamad Yossi 
Published: April 2022

<p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><em>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui nilai pembuktian kesaksian tunggal korban inses dalam pembuktian pada perkara No.44/Pid.Sus/2016/PN.Byl. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif atau terapan dengan pendakatan studi kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan penulis adalah studi dokumen atau studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis bahan hukum dalam penelitian ini bersifat deduksi dengan metode silogisme.</em></p><p><em>Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan menghasilkan simpulan bahwa a</em><em>pabila saksi tunggal korban inses memberitahukan perbuatan terdakwa kepada orang tua ataupun orang terdekatnya juga bisa disebut sebagai saksi dan telah sesuai dengan asas unnus testis nullus testis dimana standar minimal agar suatu saksi menjadi alat bukti adalah dua saksi.</em></p><p> </p><p><strong><em>Kata Kunci</em></strong><em> :Pembuktian, </em><em>saksi tunggal, Inses.</em></p><p align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><em>This study aims to find out the value of proof of a single testimony of incest victims in proof in case No.44 / Pid.Sus / 2016 / PN.Byl. This study is a normative legal research that is prescriptive or applied with the case study approach. The sources of legal material used in this study are primary legal material and secondary legal material. The legal material collection technique used by the author is a document study or library study. The technique of analyzing legal material in this research is deduction with a syllogism method.</em><em></em></p><p><em>Based on the results of the research and discussion, it was concluded that if the single witness of the incest victim notified the defendant's actions to the parents or the uncovered person it could also be called a witness and in accordance with the principle of unnus testis nullus testis where the minimum standard for witnesses was two witnesses. </em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><em>Keywords: Proof, single witness, Incest.</em></p>
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENGADILI DELIK ADUAN TURUT SERTA MELAKUKAN ZINAH YANG TELAH KEDALUWARSA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 360/K/MIL/2017)
Authors: Pandora Alodia 
Published: April 2022

<p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong></p><p><em>Penelitian ini mengkaji permasalahan daluwarsa penuntutan pada studi kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 360 K/MIL//2017 yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian penerapan pengaturan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Militer dan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer terhadap fakta hukum yang terdapat dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 360 K/MIL//2017. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah putusan Judex Facti dalam delik aduan turut serta melakukan perzinahan yang telah kadaluwarsa tidak sesuai dengan Pasal 74 Ayat (1) KUHP. Judex Facti telah salah dalam menerapkan hukum atau tidak berdasar pada hukum sebagaimana mestinya dan mengabaikan fakta bahwa sesungguhnya penuntutan tersebut sudah kedaluwarsa melebihi jangka waktu 6 (enam) bulan.</em></p><p><strong>Kata Kunci: </strong>Kedaluwarsa, Perzinahan</p><p align="center"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong></p><p><em>This study examines the problem about criminal complaint which has exceeded the statute of limitation on case study of Supreme Court Decision Number 360/K/MIL/2017 according to regulation on Criminal Law Code, Military Criminal Law Code and Law Number 31 of 1997 concerning Military Justice towards law fact which occurred on Supreme Court Decision Number 360/K/MIL/2017.</em> <em>The result from this study shows that the District Court judgment for granting criminal complaint on complicity in adultery crime which has exceeded the statute of limitations is not in accordance with Article 74 Act (1) Criminal Law Code. The District Code has been wrong in applying the law or groundless on law and ignoring the fact that criminal complaint has exceeded the statute of limitation, exceed 6 (six) months time period.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Statute of Limitations, Adultery</em></p>
UPAYA PENINJAUAN KEMBALI TERPIDANA BERDASARKAN KEKELIRUAN ATAU KEKHILAFAN HAKIM SEBAGAI NOVUM DALAM MENGADILI PERKARA PEMALSUAN SURAT
Authors: Alexander Reynald Belfast 
Published: April 2022

<p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong></p><p><em>Penelitian ini untuk mengkaji upaya peninjauan kembali yang diajukan oleh Terpidana berdasarkan kekeliruan atau kekhilafan hakim sebagai </em><em>novum dalam mengadili perkara pemalsuan surat telah sesuai dengan Pasal 263 KUHAP dan mengkaji kesesuaian Pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung dalam mengabulkan upaya peninjauan kembali dan memutus Terpidana lepas dari segala tuntutan hukum telah sesuai dengan Pasal 266 KUHAP. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan kasus. Sumber data diperoleh dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum adalah studi kasus. Bahan hukum diolah menggunakan metode silogisme deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan hakim telah khilaf dan keliru secara nyata menyatakan bahwa Pemohon terbukti menggunakan surat palsu sebagaimana didakwakan dalam Pasal 263 ayat (2) KUHP sebab surat palsu yang didakwakan didasarkan pada persangkaan dan dugaan saksi-saksi, serta bukti surat palsu tersebut hanya berupa fotokopi, sehingga Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan permohonan peninjauan kembali dan menyatakan Terdakwa lepas dari segala tuntutan hukum.</em></p><p><strong><em>Kata Kunci: </em></strong><em>Peninjauan Kembali, Pemalsuan Surat, Novum</em><strong><em></em></strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong></p><p><em>This study aims to examine the review efforts submitted by the convicted person based This study is to examine the review efforts submitted by convicts based on a mistake or oversight of the judge as novum in adjudicating cases of forgery of letters in accordance with Article 263 of the Criminal Procedure Code and reviewing the suitability of the Supreme Court's consideration in granting a review and deciding the convicts of all lawsuits are appropriate with Article 266 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The method used in this study is normative research that is prescriptive and applied. The approach used is the case approach. Data sources were obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique is a case study. Legal materials are processed using deductive syllogism methods. Based on the result by the reasearch and the study that the judge erroneously and erroneously stated that the Applicant was proven to be using a fake letter as charged in Article 263 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code because the fake letter being indicted was based on suspicion and alleged witnesses, and proof of the fake letter was only a photocopy, so the Supreme Court grant a request for reconsideration and declare the Defendant free from all lawsuits.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Review, Letter Forgery, Novum</em><strong><em></em></strong></p>