Plasma RAS dynamics and anti-EGFR rechallenge efficacy in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: REMARRY and PURSUIT trials.
Authors: Kagawa Yoshinori , Kotani Daisuke , Bando Hideaki , Takahashi Naoki , Hamaguchi Tetsuya , Kanazawa Akiyoshi , Kato Takeshi , Ando Koji , Satake Hironaga , Shinozaki Eiji , Sunakawa Yu , Takashima Atsuo , Yamazaki Kentaro , Yuki Satoshi , Nakajima Hiromichi , Nakamura Yoshiaki , Wakabayashi Masashi , Taniguchi Hiroya , Ohta Takashi , Yoshino Takayuki 
Published: June 2022

3518 Background: Rechallenge with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (EGFR mAb) showed certain activities in patients (pts) with RAS/ BRAF V600E wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), particularly in pts with negative plasma RAS (p RAS) mutation by circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay at ‘just before’ the rechallenge therapy. However, the efficacy is unknown in pts with RAS/ BRAF wt mCRC whose p RAS was converted to positive once during or after EGFR mAb. Therefore, we conducted REMARRY, a prospective longitudinal study to investigate the p RAS dynamics, and PURSUIT trials, a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy of EGFR mAb rechallenge in pts with p RAS wt just before rechallenge therapy. Methods: The eligibility criteria of REMARRY trial included RAS/ BRAF V600E wt mCRC; ECOG PS 0-1; CR or PR during EGFR mAb; and a refractory ≤ 2 months from the last administration of EGFR mAb. p RAS status by the BEAMing method was prospectively monitored at timepoints of progression on EGFR mAb and each subsequent therapy. The eligibility criteria of PURSUIT trial included enrollment in the REMARRY trial with confirmed p RAS wt prior to enrollment in PURSUIT trial; being refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan; and ≥ 4 months of EGFR mAb-free interval. Study treatment was rechallenge with panitumumab + irinotecan (6 mg/kg + 150 mg/m2 q2wks). Primary endpoint was a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1. The required number of pts was 45, with a null ORR of 10%, an expected ORR of 25%, power of 85%, and one-sided α of 0.05. Results: Between May 2019 and May 2021, 183 pts with 343 timepoints (median, 2) were enrolled in REMARRY trial from 27 institutions, and 50 pts were enrolled in PURSUIT trial; median age, 68 years; left-sided primary, 44 pts; prior EGFR mAb, 1st/2nd/≥3rd lines was 28/6/16 pts; and p RAS status at progression on prior EGFR mAb, wt/mutant (mt)/unknown in 31/7/12 pts. Confirmed ORR and disease control rate were 14% (90% CI, 7.8%–23.9%) and 80% (95% CI, 67.0%–88.8%), respectively. In addition, 4 pts showed an unconfirmed PR. With a median follow-up time of 8.7 months, median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (95% CI, 3.0 – 4.7 months). The subgroup analysis showed a significantly higher confirmed ORR in pts with a longer EGFR mAb-free interval than a shorter one (> vs. < 365 days, 44.4% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.0037). Without any unexpected safety signals, 58.5% of pts had ≥ grade 3 adverse events. Of 31 patients with wt p RAS at progression on prior EGFR mAb, 5 had a confirmed response (ORR, 16%), whereas no response was observed in patients with 7 p RAS mt (ORR, 0%) (p = 0.25). Conclusions: The primary endpoint of confirmed ORR was not met; however, pts with p RAS wt at progression on prior EGFR mAb may benefit from rechallenge with, implying a lack of or worse response if p RAS becomes positive even once during or after EGFR mAb. Clinical trial information: REMARRY: UMIN000036424 PURSUIT: jRCTs031190096.