bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Molecular characterization of NF1-mutated NSCLC and clinical outcomes.
Authors: Gates Christopher , Sdrimas Konstantinos , Elliott Andrew , Borghaei Hossein , Xiu Joanne , Walker Phillip , Vanderwalde Ari M. , Liu Stephen V. , Bustamante Alvarez Jean Gabriel 
Published: June 2022

9086 Background: NF1 is a tumor suppressor gene that regulates the RAS-MAPK and mTOR pathways. Co-mutations previously observed with NF1-mutations (mt) include TP53, KRAS, EGFR and rarely HER2, STK11, and PIK3CA mutations. We report a comprehensive molecular characterization with clinical outcomes analyses for NF1-mt non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA (592-gene or whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome) was performed for NSCLC patient (pt) samples (n = 10,310) submitted to a CLIA-certified laboratory (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ).. RAS-MAPK and PI3K-AKT-MTOR signaling were assessed by transcriptional signatures of pathway activation (MAPK pathway Activation Score [MPAS], Wagle, 2018; and GSEA Hallmarks collection, respectively)., PD-L1 by immunohistochemistry (IHC, positive: TPS ≥1%), high tumor mutational burden (TMB) defined as ≥10 mut/Mb, and deficient mismatch repair/high microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-High) was assessed by IHC/NGS. Overall survival (OS) was obtained from insurance claims. Statistical significance was determined using Chi-square & Wilcoxon rank sum tests. P-value adjust for multiple hypothesis testing (Benjamini-Hochberg). Results: NF1-mt were identified in 1,045 NSCLC samples (10.1%). Concurrent KRAS, EGFR, ERBB2, BRAF or MET alterations are noted in Table 1, with no ROS1, RET or ALK fusions identified. Compared to NF1-wt, NF1-mt NSCLC was associated with increased RAS-MAPK expression (3.0-fold, P < 0.0001), while PI3K-AKT-MTOR-signaling was not significantly increased (2.1-fold, P = 0.12). Rates of TMB-High (51.7% vs 32.5%, P < 0.0001), PD-L1+ (69.1% vs 58.8%, P = 0.06), and dMMR/MSI-High (1.7 vs 0.7%, P < 0.05) were higher in NF1-mt samples. OS and duration on treatment from the start of Pembrolizumab (HR: 1.0 and 1.0, respectively) or other IOs (HR: 0.9 and 1.0, respectively) were not significantly different between NF1-mt and NF1-wt patients, However, among NF1-mt samples, high TMB and TP53-wt were associated with better OS (HR 0.6, P < 0.05 each). Conclusions: NF1-mt patients rarely harbored actionable NSCLC driver co-alterations. NF1-mt cases showed increased activation of RAS-MAPK axis, which may represent a potential pathway to target with MEK inhibitors. NF1- mt are responsive to immunotherapy and better outcomes are seen with high TMB and absence of TP53 mutations. Further work is warranted to determine the influence of actionable drivers on targeted therapy outcomes in NF1-mt NSCLC. [Table: see text]
Subgroup analysis in patients (pts) with non-squamous (N-Sq), EGFR-wild type (wt), second/third-line NSCLC from the global phase (Ph) 3 trial DUBLIN-3 (BPI-2358-103) with the plinabulin/docetaxel (Plin/Doc) combination versus Doc alone.
Authors: Han Baohui , Feinstein Trevor , Shi Yuankai , Chen Michael , Huang Lan , Mohanlal Ramon W. , Sun Yan 
Published: June 2022

9090 Background: With PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors moving to first line in NSCLC, 2nd/3rd line NSCLC is a severe unmet medical need, dominated by docetaxel-based therapies with > 40% severe neutropenia and limited survival. Plin, a novel immune-enhancing small molecule, enhances dendritic cell maturation and T-Cell proliferation. In the ITT population, the Plin/Doc combination had superior Efficacy (mOS; HR = 0.82, p = 0.0399), Safety (lower Gr3/4 AE rate/pt/year (yr); p = 0.038) and better Quality of Life (QTWiST; p = 0.026) versus (vs) standard of care (SoC) Doc alone in advanced and metastatic NSCLC pts in DUBLIN-3 (Han, ESMO 2021) who failed platinum therapy. Here we report on the N-Sq pts subgroup. Methods: DUBLIN-3(NCT02504489) was a randomized, single-blind (pts only), active controlled Ph3 study in 2nd/3rd line stage IIIB/IV, EGFR wt NSCLC pts with a measurable lesion (RECIST 1.1) in the lung, and ECOG ≤ 2, conducted in US, Australia and China. Pts (n = 559) were randomized 1:1 to Plin/Doc or Doc/Placebo (21-day (D) cycle (C)). Doc (75 mg/m2 on D1 and Plin 30 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 were given by IV infusion. A post-hoc analysis of median Overall Survival (mOS) and restricted mean survival time (RMST) from K-M curves, OS rate at 24,36 and 48 month (Mo), and grade 4 neutropenia (Gr4N) rates was performed for the N-Sq patients (n = 153 for Plin/doc and n = 178 for Doc). Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between both groups. Primary and key secondary objectives in the ITT population were met (Han, ESMO 2021). Plin/Doc was well tolerated. Estimated Adverse Event Rate per Year [95% CI] was 1.43 [1.13,1.81] for Plin/Doc versus 2.77 [2.33,3.28] for Doc alone (p < 0.001). The median OS benefit is 2.6 months (p = 0.023). The table below summarizes the results for the N-Sq subgroup. Conclusions: The addition of Plin to Doc was superior to SoC Doc alone for efficacy and safety in the clinically relevant subgroup of non-squamous EGFR-wild type, 2nd/3rd line NSCLC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02504489. [Table: see text]
Capecitabine in pretreated metastatic pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: A retrospective study.
Authors: Cheung Gavin Tin Chun , Cheung Ka Man , Chow James Chung Hang , Au Kwok Hung , Yiu Harry Ho Yin 
Published: June 2022

9093 Background: Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) is a rare disease, sharing common histological features with the undifferentiated subtype of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and being under-represented in non-small cell lung cancer trials and clinical guidelines. While gemcitabine-based platinum doublet chemotherapy is more established in 1st line treatment of stage IV disease, there is limited evidence for subsequent treatment strategy. Oral capecitabine is one of the active agents in metastatic NPC, and was observed to have encouraging outcomes in pulmonary LELC. Methods: All consecutive patients with pulmonary LELC in 2010 – 2019 treated in a tertiary institution were reviewed. Patients with metastatic disease who progressed after gemcitabine-based platinum doublets and treated with capecitabine were included. Capecitabine was given at 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest in each cycle. Treatment response was monitored by clinical history, physical examination and imaging. Treatment was continued till drug holiday, intolerance or disease progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Clinical predictors for PFS and OS were analyzed using log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Of the 140 LELC patients identified, 36 patients satisfied the above inclusion criteria (14 male, 22 female). Median age was 58.6 years old (range 41.5 – 75.6). All patients had an ECOG performance score of 0 or 1. 16 patients (44.4%) received 2 or more lines of prior systemic treatment. Median capecitabine cycles received was 5 (range 2 – 68). Objective response rate was 27.8% (complete response: 5.6%; partial response: 22.2%), disease control rate was 75.0%. With a median follow-up of 15.3 months (range 1.8 – 82.6), the median PFS and OS were 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.1 – 8.8) and 15.4 months (95% CI, 10.0 – 20.7) respectively. Capecitabine was generally well tolerated, with 22.2% grade 3 or above side effects, and 5.6% treatment termination due to intolerance. Bone and distant lymph node (LN) involvement were significant predictors of poorer PFS on multivariate analyses (bone: HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.44 – 7.29, p=0.004; distant LN: HR: 2.62, 95% CI 1.14 – 6.02, p=0.024). Age, sex, smoking history, number of treatment lines, and other sites of disease involvement were not significant predictors. Conclusions: This is to date the largest reported cohort of capecitabine in pre-treated metastatic pulmonary LELC. Capecitabine is effective and well tolerated, and should be considered as a treatment option after 1st line platinum-based chemotherapy. Future studies are warranted to delineate the optimal treatment pathway of this rare disease entity.
Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of mobocertinib versus amivantamab in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins).
Authors: Ou Sai-Hong Ignatius , Prawitz Thibaud , Lin Huamao Mark , Hong Jin-Liern , Tan Minal , Proskorovsky Irina , Hernandez Luis , Jin Shu , Zhang Pingkuan , Lin Jianchang , Patel Jyoti D. , Nguyen Danny , Neal Joel W. 
Published: June 2022

9115 Background: Mobocertinib (mobo) and amivantamab (ami) are FDA-approved treatments for patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins whose disease progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. An unanchored MAIC was used to compare confirmed overall response rate (cORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between mobo and ami. Methods: Clinical outcomes were compared in platinum-pretreated pts with EGFR ex20ins+ NSCLC treated with mobo 160 mg QD in a phase I/II single-arm study (NCT02716116, cut-off 1 Nov 2020, n=114) or with ami 1,050 mg (1,400 mg, ≥80 kg) in a phase I single-arm study (NCT02609776, cut-off 8 June 2020, n=81). Differences in baseline characteristics reported in both studies, including age, race, sex, smoking status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, histology, sites of metastasis (brain, bone and liver), time from advanced diagnosis, number of prior lines of therapy, prior immuno-oncology therapy, prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment and prior EGFR ex20ins targeted therapy, were adjusted with MAIC. Results: After MAIC weighting all reported baseline characteristics were balanced between mobo and ami. OS and cORR per investigator assessment (INV) were similar between mobo and ami (Table). cORR per independent review committee (IRC) was numerically higher for ami (odds ratio [OR]=0.64, p value=0.230). For PFS per IRC, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was numerically favorable for mobo (HR=0.82, p value=0.417). Among the responders, DoR was longer for mobo (DoR per INV: HR=0.44, p value=0.049; DoR per IRC: HR=0.56, p value=0.149). Conclusions: Mobo and ami appear to have overall similar efficacy. As each has a different mechanism of action and route of administration, they provide multiple options in the treatment of EGFR ex20ins+ NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02716116. [Table: see text]
NeoTrio: Randomized trial of neoadjuvant (NAT) pembrolizumab (Pembro) alone, in sequence (SEQ) with, or concurrent (CON) with dabrafenib plus trametinib (D+T) in resectable BRAF-mutant stage III melanoma to determine optimal combination of therapy.
Authors: Long Georgina V. , Carlino Matteo S. , Au-Yeung George , Spillane Andrew John , Shannon Kerwin Frank , Gyorki David E. , Howle Julie R. , Ch'ng Sydney , Gonzalez Maria , Saw Robyn P.M. , Pennington Thomas , Lo Serigne N. , Scolyer Richard A. , Menzies Alexander M. 
Published: June 2022

9503 Background: Combination anti-PD(L)1 and BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy (TT) improves PFS in stage IV melanoma vs TT. In stage IV melanoma recent data suggest immunotherapy 1st until progression, rather than BRAF-TT, improves OS, and induction TT upfront adds little benefit. NeoTrio explored the optimal combination of BRAF-TT and anti-PD1 using the NAT platform in pts with stage III melanoma (NCT02858921). Methods: 60 pts with resectable, RECIST measurable stage III (no in-transit) BRAFV600-mutant melanoma were randomized 1:1:1 to 3 arms of 6 wks of NAT followed by complete lymph node dissection (CLND): A) Pembro ALONE (200mg Q3W x 2); B) SEQ - D+T (150mg bd + 2mg od) for 1 wk followed by pembro (200mg x 2); C) CON – D+T+pembro (doses as SEQ). Pts had 46 wks pembro post-CLND. Primary endpoint was the pathological response rate (pRR) and pathological complete response (pCR) at wk 6. Secondary endpoints; RECIST RR at wk 6, event-free survival (EFS), RFS, OS, adverse events (AE) and translational endpoints. Results: At data cutoff 2 Jan 2022, 20 pts per arm had similar baseline characteristics; overall 42% female, med age 53 yrs, 82% BRAF V600E, 62% clinical N1b. Med f/u was 20 months (95% CI 17-31). The pCR rate and pRR were highest in CON arm, and similar in ALONE and SEQ arms (Table). Events (progression before surgery, recurrence after surgery or death) were highest in ALONE arm at this 1st analysis (Table). Assessment of the durability of path response subtypes in each arm is ongoing. Most common Rx related AE were fatigue (65%, 70%, 70%, ALONE, SEQ and CON respectively), pyrexia (0%, 25%, 85%) and rash (50%, 35%, 35%). Gd 3/4 AE occurred in 30%, 25% and 55%, respectively; pyrexia and hepatitis were common in CON during NAT. Rx interruptions during NAT occurred in 0, 3 and 19 pts, respectively; 1, 0 and 8 pts permanently discontinued. Post NAT surgical operability was the same or improved in 81%. Longitudinal analysis of melanoma tissue, microenvironment and microbiome is ongoing. Conclusions: CON D+T+pembro achieved the highest pRR, pCR rate, but with greater toxicity. Recurrences were seen in those with pCR/near pCR in BRAF-TT containing arms, but not in pembro ALONE, in keeping with previous data of NAT with checkpoint inhibitors vs BRAF-TT. Short course of D+T prior to PD1 did not improve path response, despite previous translational data showing increased tumour infiltrating T-cells early-during treatment with D+T. Follow up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02858921. [Table: see text]
Phase II study SECOMBIT (sequential combo immuno and target therapy study): A subgroup analysis with a longer follow-up.
Authors: Ascierto Paolo Antonio , Mandalà Mario , Ferrucci Pier Francesco , Guidoboni Massimo , Rutkowski Piotr , Ferraresi Virginia , Arance Ana Maria , Guida Michele , Maiello Evaristo , Gogas Helen , Richtig Erika , Fierro Maria Teresa , Lebbe Celeste , Helgadottir Hildur , Melero Bermejo Ignacio , Palmieri Giuseppe , Giannarelli Diana , Grimaldi Antonio Maria , Dummer Reinhard , Chiarion-Sileni Vanna 
Published: June 2022

9535 Background: To investigate the best sequential strategy, we started the SECOMBIT study, a randomized three parallel arms phase 2 study (NCT02631447). We used the combination of encorafenib/binimetinib (E+B) as targeted therapy (T-T) and the combination of ipilimumab/nivolumab (I+N) as immunotherapy (I-O). We explored the two different sequences and the “sandwich” strategy with a short course of target therapy, switched by combo immunotherapy at the best response, and not at progression of disease. In our previous report we have observed a trend in favor of the arms where I-O was given as first, confirmed by the first report of the DreamSeq study, a phase III study which compared the two different sequences with T-T and I-O. Here we updated the study data with a subgroup analysis. Methods: From Nov 2016 to May 2019, 37 centers in 9 countries enrolled 251 patients with untreated, metastatic BRAFV600 melanoma. Patients were randomized to Arm A [E+B until PD, followed by I+N], or Arm B (I+N until PD, followed by E+B) or Arm C (E+B for 8 weeks, followed by I+N until PD, followed by E+B). The overall survival (OS) is the primary endpoint of the study. Secondary endpoints included total progression-free survival (tPFS), 2- and 3-years survival rate, best overall response rate, duration of response, biomarkers evaluation. Results: The study primary endpoint was met in each arm with at least 30 patients alive at 24 months. The median follow-up estimated with the reverse Kaplan-Meier method was 37.1 months (IQR: 32.8-46.4). The OS at 2 and 3 years was calculated in the three arms for all patients, and in the subgroups normal or elevate LDH level and < 3 or ≥ 3 metastatic sites. OS and tPFS rates at 2 and 3 years are shown in the table. Conclusions: With a 37.1 months median follow-up, 2 and 3-years OS as well as tPFS rates are higher in Arm B and C. In line with recent findings, the SECOMBIT results confirm a better trend in favor of Arm B and C treatment sequence. The analysis of the secondary endpoints is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02631447. [Table: see text]
Efficacy and tolerance of systemic therapies in metastatic melanoma of unknown primary versus known cutaneous: A multicenter retrospective study from the MelBase French Cohort.
Authors: Rousset Perrine , Dalle Stéphane , Mortier Laurent , Dereure Olivier , Dalac Sophie , Dutriaux Caroline , Leccia Marie Thérèse , Legoupil Delphine , Descamps Vincent , De Quatrebarbes Julie , Grob Jean-Jacques , Saiag Philippe , Maubec Eve , Stoebner Pierre-Emmanuel , Granel Brocard Florence , Arnault Jean-Philippe , Allayous Clara , Oriano Bastien , Lebbe Celeste , Montaudie Henri 
Published: June 2022

9556 Background: Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) account for 3% of all melanomas. Clinical outcome of advanced MUP in the era of novel therapies including immunotherapies (ICI) and targeted therapies (TT) have been only scarcely studied, whereas a possibly different biologic background might introduce changes in its management. Recent retrospective studies suggested that patients with advanced MUP could benefit at least as much from novel therapies as patients with known primary cutaneous melanoma (cMKP). Methods: Based on the nationwide MelBase prospective database (NCT02828202) this retrospective study included patients with advanced melanoma treated with first-line ICI, TT or CT. MUP was defined by upfront occurrence of (sub)cutaneous, nodal and/or visceral metastasis without any known prior or concomitant primary tumor. Patients with primary mucosal or ocular melanoma were excluded. Both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed as co-primary variables in MUP vs cMKP, stratified by treatment subset (ICI vs TT vs CT vs whole cohort). Secondary variable was treatment-related toxicity. Multivariate analyses and propensity score analysis were performed. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of systemic treatments (ICI, TT and chemotherapy (CT)) in patients with advanced MUP comparatively to stage-matched cMKP. Results: A total of 1882 patients were analyzed, including 265 (14.1%) MUP. Most patients were treated with first-line ICI. Median follow-up was 16 months. Patients in the MUP cohort more often displayed unfavorable initial prognostic factors (Table). PFS and OS did not significantly differ in MUP compared to MKP patients (p=0.73 and p=0.93 respectively). Stratification of cohorts by treatment type and application of propensity score did not lead to data modification. Treatment-related toxicity rate and severity did not differ between MUP and MKP, regardless of treatment type. Conclusions: Our results suggest that advanced MUP should be managed with similar strategies as advanced MKP. In our cohort, MUP patients benefited from novel therapies as much as MKP patients despite less favorable baseline prognostic factors. Exploratory studies investigating mutational burden and host immunity are needed to identify the underlying mechanisms. [Table: see text]
The effect of breast radiotherapy parameters (XRT), chemotherapy regimens (CT) and dual anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) on the development of cardiac dysfunction (CD) among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer from Saudi Arabia.
Authors: Abusanad Atlal M. , Iskanderani Omar , Al-hajeili Marwan R. , Ujaimi Reem 
Published: June 2022

e12508 Background: Treatment with anti-HER2 therapy can cause CD. The effect of breast XRT, heart dose and V25 of the heart and CT regimen on developing CD is controversial. The impact of these variables in developing CD among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), receiving CT plus anti-HER2 MoAb was evaluated in routine clinical practice. Methods: Patients with HER2-positive BC between 2015-2019 were included, retrospectively. CD is defined as a drop in (EF%) of at least 10 % points from baseline and/or below 50% at any point of the time during follow-up. The association of CD and various variables was examined with a significance level of < 0.05. Results: Data from 224 female patients were analyzed with a mean age at diagnosis of 51 +12, BMI 29.6 ± 6.4, BSA 1.74 ± 0.19, 53% with left BC, 63% had non-metastatic BC, 52% with comorbidities, 11% had prior IHD medication use in 48%; metformin in 15% and B-blockers in 5%, 9.4% smoker, 70% had a mastectomy, 18% lumpectomy and 12% no surgery, 58% received XRT. The cumulative incidence of CD was 33% during follow-up noting that the first and subsequent drops of EF at any point of time during the follow-up was counted as a new event even for the same patient. The univariate analysis of factors influencing the risk of CD is shown in Table. However, the initial significance of CT regimen and whether the patient received breast XRT or otherwise, did not translate into significance on multivariate analysis with a P-value = 0.198 & 0.326, respectively. Conclusions: XRT mean heart dose and V25 of the heart, anthracycline-based CT did not influence the risk of CD among this cohort. Likewise, the dual anti-HER2 therapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab and the number of trastuzumab cycles did not influence CD. It is reassuring to demonstrate the safety of these approaches in real-life clinical practice.[Table: see text]
The Breast Cancer Index Registry Study: Initial analysis of the first 1,000 patients.
Authors: O'Shaughnessy Joyce , Encarnacion Carlos A. , O'Neal Brandon , Wong Jenna , Siuliukina Natalia , Sanft Tara B. , Jankowitz Rachel Catherine , Pegram Mark D. , Treuner Kai , Fox Jenny R. 
Published: June 2022

e12513 Background: The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a gene expression-based biomarker that reports two results: BCI Predictive [BCI (H/I)], which predicts benefit from extended endocrine therapy (EET), and BCI Prognostic, which combines the Molecular Grade Index (MGI) with BCI (H/I) to provide individualized risk of both late (5-10 years) and overall (0-10 years) distant recurrence. The NCCN clinical practice guideline recommends use of BCI for prediction of benefit from EET in early stage, hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer patients. Methods: The BCI Registry study was designed to prospectively evaluate the long-term clinical outcome, medication adherence and quality of life in HR+ early-stage breast cancer patients receiving BCI testing as part of routine clinical care. The BCI registry will enroll approximately 3,000 patients after completion of 4-7 years of primary adjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients will be followed for disease recurrence for at least 10 years from diagnosis. Patients extending endocrine therapy will be assessed annually for medication adherence. To evaluate the impact of BCI results on EET decision making, both the physician and patient will complete Decision Impact Questionnaires. Clinicopathological data are collected within the ClinCapture electronic data capture system. The BCI Registry Study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT04875351. Results: The BCI Registry Study completed enrollment of the first 1,000 patients in January 2022. Clinical data were available for 942 patients (76.8% T1; 51.3% grade II; 75.4% N0). BCI test results were reported for 842 patients. 315 patients (37.4%) were classified as BCI (H/I)-High and 527 patients (62.6%) as BCI (H/I)-Low. Further, in node-negative (N0) patients, BCI classified 314 N0 patients (47.9%) with high risk for late distant recurrence and 342 patients (52.1%) with low risk. In node-positive (N1) patients, BCI classified 138 patients (74.2%) as high risk for late distant recurrence and 48 patients (25.8%) as low risk. The associated clinicopathological factors are shown in the table. Conclusions: The analysis of the first 1,000 BCI Registry patients confirms the expected distribution of clinicopathological factors. BCI by H/I status and prognostic risk groups are consistent with previous clinical validation studies. Clinical trial information: NCT04875351. [Table: see text]