bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Changing the use of isolated urine-culture testing with diagnostic testing stewardship
Authors: Penney Jessica , Rodday Angie , Sebastiani Paola , Snydman David , Doron Shira 
Published: May 2022

Background: Urine testing is one of the more frequently ordered diagnostic tests among hospitalized patients. Many hospitals have implemented urinalysis with reflex culture (UARC) as a method of diagnostic testing stewardship to guide appropriate use of urine testing. Isolated urine culture, or urine culture without preceding urinalysis, is the most appropriate diagnostic test for patients who are neutropenic, pregnant, or those about to undergo an invasive urologic procedures. This testing is often used beyond these indications in hospitals though, potentially leading to overdiagnosis of UTI and overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria. Methods: We compared outcomes in the preimplementation period (December 2018–November 2019) to those in the postintervention period (December 2019–October 2020) at an academic medical center. The intervention was the addition of an indication selection (ie pregnancy, neutropenia, etc) to the isolated urine-culture order in the electronic medical record (EMR). The primary outcomes were isolated urine culture rate per 1,000 patient days and urine-culture positivity. Our exploratory analysis included a review of selected indications after the intervention was implemented and a chart review of a subset of these tests for appropriateness. The primary analysis was performed using interrupted time-series negative binomial regression. Results: There was no significant change in isolated urine-culture rates after the intervention (11.18 cultures per 1,000 patient days before the intervention versus to 7.75 cultures per 1,000 patient days after the intervention; P > .90), and there were as no significant pre- or postintervention trends. We detected no significant change in isolated urine-culture positivity: 26.9% before the intervention versus 26.7% after the intervention (P > .90). These results are shown graphically in Fig. 1. In the exploratory analysis, of 661 isolated urine-culture tests ordered in the postintervention period, the indication for testing was left blank in 71.9% of tests. The other most common reasons for testing included other (16%), pregnancy (5.7%), and neutropenia (4.4%). In the 100 tests reviewed for appropriateness, only 8% had a documented diagnosis corresponding with the selected indication for testing. Discussion: The addition of an indication selection for isolated urine culture testing did not change the rates of culture ordering or the culture’s subsequent likelihood of positivity. In the exploratory analysis, most providers were incorrectly selecting this testing rather than UARC as prompted. Next steps could potentially be removing the “other” category and requiring a selected answer or requiring approval from stewardship team prior to ordering. Continued education of providers is paramount to the appropriate use of diagnostic testing.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Investigating a cluster of pediatric oncology invasive fungal infections–Lessons learned
Authors: Terk Angelette , Ormsby Jennifer , Conrad Paula , Svensson Catherine , Barry David , Davis David , Malloy Ana Vaughan , Sandora Tom 
Published: May 2022

Background: In spring 2021, the infection prevention and control department at a pediatric academic medical center identified 3 oncology patients with concern for invasive Rhizopus spp infections. An in-depth investigation was conducted, but a common source of the fungus was not identified. In August 2021, an additional oncology patient with concern for invasive Rhizopus spp was identified, resulting in an extended investigation for possible sources of fungus. Methods: A multidisciplinary work group was assembled. The CDC Targeted Environmental Investigation Checklist for Outbreaks of Invasive Infections Caused by Environmental Fungi was used as a framework for conducting the investigation. Stakeholders were engaged throughout the process, including the hematology–oncology service, hospital leadership, environmental services, patient safety and quality, and facilities and engineering. The investigation included hospital incident command system (HICS) activation; visual inspection of patient rooms and common spaces; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) review; environmental sampling (surfaces, linen, and air); chart review; and process mapping. Results: By early October 2021, 2 environmental samples grew isolates (each at 1 CFU/m3) of the same species of Rhizopus as one of the affected patients. One sample was from a patient room, and the other from an outdoor garden space. No source of indoor amplification of Rhizopus was identified. The investigation revealed several opportunities for improvement: annual room maintenance schedules, use of gardens and outdoor spaces by at-risk patients, linen storage, construction and/or infection control risk assessment (ICRA) processes, and appliances used by families (eg, washing machines and refrigerators). Work streams were established to address each of these areas. Conclusions: No definite source was identified for the 4 invasive Rhizopus spp infections. This extensive investigation highlighted multiple opportunities for improvement; the changes implemented may prevent future invasive fungal infections in high-risk pediatric patients.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
My patient needs home IV antibiotics–Now what? Assessing OPAT involvement at a Veterans’ Affairs hospital
Authors: Breeden Maddy , Scruggs Elizabeth , Patel Payal , Krein Sarah , Kendall Ronald , Starnes Andrea , Lopus Tracy 
Published: May 2022

Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) involves the administration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy outside the hospital. The literature suggests that inpatient providers are often unaware of OPAT programs and may not engage this multidisciplinary group in a timely fashion, leading to potentially inappropriate OPAT use. However, few studies have directly addressed this issue. We characterized current practices for coordinating OPAT and assessed provider understanding of OPAT services. We also conducted an exploratory analysis of placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) consultation prior to an infectious disease (ID) consultation as a proxy for potentially avoidable OPAT use. Methods: This study was conducted between September and December 2021 at the Ann Arbor VA Healthcare System. All charts (n = 212) in which a consultation for a PICC was placed between January and September 2021 were reviewed, including free-text data entered by patient teams and inpatient progress notes in the days leading up to and following PICC consultation. Additionally, inpatient providers were surveyed using an online format regarding knowledge, utilization, and perceptions of OPAT. Results: Of the 212 charts reviewed, 108 patient encounters resulted in PICC placement; 80 (74.1%) were placed for the indication of home IV antibiotics. Of these, 3 (4.0%) had the PICC consult placed prior to the ID consultation. Of the 104 PICC consultations that were cancelled, 9 (8.7%) were cancelled because the ID staff did not recommend home IV antibiotics. Other reasons for cancellation included alternative device placement, duplicate order, referral to interventional radiology, failure to meet criteria, or unsuccessful placement. Of the 285 inpatient providers sent the electronic survey, 121 (46.9%) completed at least some portion. Overall, 17 respondents (14.0%) were familiar with the acronym OPAT; however, only 10 were able to expand the acronym correctly. Of the 118 respondents asked about their familiarity with the OPAT program at the local institution, 98 (83.1%) were not familiar at all or were only slightly familiar with the program. In contrast, 7 respondents (6.0%) were very or extremely familiar with the OPAT program. Conclusions: Further education and structural interventions are necessary to improve inpatient providers’ awareness and early engagement of local OPAT programs to ensure appropriate OPAT use. An educational intervention with an informative flowchart diagramming the steps for engaging the OPAT team could raise awareness and improve engagement when potential OPAT needs are identified (Fig. 1).Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Retrospective cohort analysis of the safety of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in an academic hospital
Authors: Billmeyer Kaylyn , Galdys Alison , Kline Susan , Hirsch Elizabeth , Ross Jennifer , Evans Michael 
Published: May 2022

Background: Although many infectious conditions can be safely treated with oral antimicrobials, select circumstances require parenteral antimicrobial therapy. Benefits of OPAT include prevention of hospital-associated conditions and significant cost savings. However, risks of OPAT include adverse drug events (ADEs) and vascular access device (VAD) complications. We analyzed the safety of OPAT regimens as part of implementing a collaborative OPAT program. Methods: We reviewed adult patients discharged home from an academic hospital between January 2019 and June 2021. Patients with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Data on OPAT agents, ADEs, and VAD complications were collected from electronic medical records by 2 reviewers using a standardized REDCap instrument. The institutional review board approved this study. Results: The cohort comprised 265 unique patients; 212 (80%) received single-drug therapy and 53 (20%) received multidrug therapy. In total, 81 patients (31%), who received a total of 110 antimicrobials, experienced an ADE. In total, 55 patients (21%), who received a total of 72 antimicrobials, experienced a VAD complication. Patients who received >1 antimicrobial were more likely to experience an ADE (53% vs 25%; P = .0002) or a VAD complication (32% vs 18%; P = .04). Cephalosporins were the most frequently prescribed antimicrobial class (Table 1). Conclusions: ADEs and VAD complications were frequent in patients on OPAT. Local data should inform (1) the selection of OPAT therapy and (2) the standardized monitoring of patients who receive OPAT going forward in the implementation of this collaborative OPAT program.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Zoster on the brain: Clinical characteristics of patients PCR positive for varicella-zoster virus in cerebrospinal fluid and implications for transmission base
Authors: Al-Saadi Mahmoud , Haden Michael , Colburn Nora , Day Shandra , Liscynesky Christina 
Published: May 2022

Background: Transmission-based precautions against varicella-zoster virus (VZV) in healthcare settings are determined by the extent of rash (localized vs disseminated) and the immune status of the host. At our facility, immunocompetent patients with localized disease are placed in standard precautions whereas patients with disseminated disease and/or immunocompromised status are placed in airborne and contact isolation. The use of molecular diagnostics has increased recently, and patients can have a PCR positive for VZV in cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) without evidence of pneumonia or disseminated rash. These patients are classified as disseminated disease, but it is unlikely that they are spreading VZV via respiratory aerosols in the absence of other symptoms. Infection prevention guidance is limited in this situation, and these patients may be in unneeded isolation, with the potential for adverse patient effects and overutilizing PPE resources. We have described the clinical characteristics of patients with a PCR positive for VZV in CSF, and we evaluated the risk for transmitting VZV via airborne aerosols. Methods: A retrospective, single-center chart review was performed on all patients admitted with a PCR positive for VZV in CSF between July 2017 and November 2021. Chart review was performed to gather data regarding clinical presentation, patient characteristics, and risk factors. Results: In total, 38 patients were identified who had a PCR positive for VZV in CSF; 22 (57.9%) were male and 16 (42.1%) were female. The median age was 47 years (IQR, 38–69). Also, 15 patients (39.5%) were immunocompromised. Moreover, 26 patients (68.4%) had a rash; 19 (50%) had localized rash; and 7 (18.4%) had disseminated rash involving ≥3 dermatomes. However, 12 patients (31.5%) had neither rash nor pneumonia. Furthermore, 5 patients (13.1%) had PCR positive for VZV in CSF and developed rash within the following 2–7 days (2 with disseminated rash). In addition, 6 patients (15.8%) had pneumonia. Of the 6 patients with pneumonia, 4 (10.5%) were immunocompromised and 3 (7.9%) were above 65-year-old. 32 patients (84.2%) were kept in airborne and contact precautions. 1 (2.6%) patient had a documented record of at least 1 dose of Shingrix vaccine. Conclusions: Most patients with a PCR test positive for VZV in the CSF were not immunocompromised and did not have evidence of disseminated rash or pneumonia. The risk of airborne transmission of VZV via small aerosols appears to be low in patients with a PCR test positive for VZV in the CSF without evidence of disseminated rash or pneumonia. Airborne isolation may not be required for many of these patients.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Development of a human factors-based tool for evaluating and improving infection prevention and control protocols
Authors: MacIntyre Emma , Perry Shawna , Osei Patience , Terhorst Raymond , Gurses Ayse 
Published: May 2022

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) protocols and guidelines are important quality management tools for educating care professionals and standardizing care processes. However, most of the actual care (ie, work as done) differ from protocol recommendations (ie, work as imagined). No tool or set of criteria has been established for how to develop human-centered IPC protocols. The goal of this research was to develop a standardized human-factors analysis method to provide healthcare organizations with a tangible framework to improve protocol usefulness and usability. Methods: The proposed analysis method combines principles from human-factors engineering (ie, usability heuristics, systems ambiguity framework) and instructional design. Relevant literature was analyzed by experts in human factors and clinical experts to develop a tool with criteria such as visualization and method ambiguity. Overall, 5 IPC-related protocols from a large academic hospital were selected from an electronic database and were evaluated using the proposed criteria. Results: During application of the analysis method, 70 human-factors–related problems were identified across 5 IPC protocols (eg, heater cooler cleaning), including violation of design heuristics and the presence of ambiguity. Frequently violated human-factors design principles included appearance and/or visibility (ie, visual display of content), visualization (ie, providing illustrative examples), and method ambiguity (ie, lack of clarity on how to complete a task). Figure 1 provides a sample of the human-factors problems identified and suggested solutions. Only minor modifications (ie, clarification of criteria definitions) were needed on the final tool. Conclusions: The human-factors–based tool developed in this study can be used both to develop new IPC protocols and to evaluate and improve existing protocols.Funding: The CDC funded this work. This material is based upon work supported by the Naval Sea Systems Command under Contract No. N00024-13-D-6400, Task Order NH076. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) or the US CDC.Disclosures: None
Mortality rates among non-Hispanic Black and White persons in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, Tennessee, 2015–2019
Authors: Kirtz Erika , Octaria Rany , Stover Carolyn , Wilson Christopher , Chan Allison 
Published: May 2022

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are an urgent public health threat, particularly those that produce carbapenemase (CP-CRE). Certain risk factors associated with CRE acquisition have been well described, such as older age, indwelling devices, prior hospitalizations, and underlying conditions. However, data are limited regarding the association of CRE and health disparities, such as race and ethnicity. Published literature has consistently shown that minority groups, including but not limited to Non-Hispanic Black persons, have higher risks of developing adverse health outcomes. To better understand the impact of race and ethnicity in CP-CRE cases, we compared 1-year mortality rates among Non-Hispanic Blacks and Non-Hispanic Whites. Methods: CRE are reportable in Tennessee; isolates must be sent to the State Public Health Laboratory for carbapenemase detection and resistance mechanism testing. We linked 2015–2019 CP-CRE surveillance cases and laboratory data from our statewide surveillance system, the National Disease Surveillance System (NEDDS)-Base System, with the Tennessee Hospital Discharge Data System (HDDS) and vital records databases. Database linkage and data analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 software. Results: Among 615 CP-CRE cases, the mean age was lower among non-Hispanic Blacks (59 years; SD, 16.6) compared to non-Hispanic Whites (mean, 65 years; SD, 15.7). Among 156 non-Hispanic Blacks with CP-CRE, 101 (64.7%) were nursing home residents, whereas 281 (71.1%) among the 395 non-Hispanic Whites were nursing home residents. Also, 64 Non-Hispanic Blacks (41%) died within 1 year of their first specimen collection date compared to 92 Non-Hispanic Whites (23.3%). Non-Hispanic Blacks with CP-CRE who died within 1 year had a mortality rate of 5.6 per 100,000 (95% CI, 4.21–6.94) Black population, which was 1.6 times higher than Non-Hispanic White persons at 3.5 per 100,000 (95% CI, 2.94–3.95; χ2P < .001) White population. Conclusions: Despite a lower mean age, non-Hispanic Black CP-CRE cases had a higher 1-year mortality rate than non-Hispanic Whites. Racial and ethnicity data often are missing or incomplete from surveillance data. Data linkages can be a valuable tool to gather additional clinical and demographic data that may be missing from public health surveillance data to improve our understanding of health disparities. Recognition of these health disparities among CRE can provide an opportunity for public health to create more targeted interventions and educational outreach.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Lessons learned: Characteristics of first-year COVID-19 hospital outbreaks
Authors: Solar Sophie , Blake Emily , Chithenga Sithembile , Haque Mefruz , Denson Anitra , Zell Renee , Steppe Jennifer , Mangla Anil , Iyengar Preetha 
Published: May 2022

Background: At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the DC Department of Health (DC Health) mandated new case reporting for early outbreak detection: (1) weekly healthcare personnel (HCP) absenteeism line lists indicating staff absent for confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2, (2) daily line lists of all SARS-CoV-2–positive inpatients, and (3) hospital contact tracing. Between March 27, 2020, and December 31, 2020, DC Health detected 36 confirmed and 14 suspected hospital outbreaks, of which only 18% (8 confirmed and 1 suspect) were known to the affected hospital. DC Health learned which outbreaks warranted early or aggressive intervention by tracking outbreak characteristics across its jurisdiction. This allowed prioritization of during surges when it was difficult for DC Health and hospital staff to investigate every outbreak. Methods: Potential outbreaks in short-stay and inpatient rehabilitation hospitals were flagged after identifying SARS-CoV-2 hospital-onset (HO) inpatients or staff clusters on line lists. Variables of interest in line lists included specimen collection and hospital admission dates, units or departments, and patient contact. Facility contact tracing by infection preventionists further verified epidemiological links among cases. Outbreak details were systematically tracked in a locally developed REDCap database and were analyzed if they had an initial case, outbreak start date, or an investigation start date in 2020. Frequency procedures, SQL statements, and date calculations were computed using SAS Enterprise Guide version 8.3 software. Results: Confirmed outbreaks had an average of 6.92 (range, 0–32) HCP and 2.58 (range, 0–22) patient cases, with 69% being confirmed-HO cases and 31% probable HO. Moreover, 53% of confirmed outbreaks occurred in the following departments: cardiac, behavioral health, intensive care, and environmental services (EVS)/facilities. All of these departments had recurrent outbreaks. Behavioral health, medical and cardiac units had the highest number of patient cases. On average, confirmed outbreak investigations lasted 24.6 days, with outbreaks prolonged in the ICU (40.25 days) and the medical unit (37.67 days). Top triggers for investigations ultimately classified as confirmed outbreaks were (1) positive symptomatic HCP, (2) confirmed-HO cases, and (3) exposures from positive HCP. Conclusions: The dynamic nature of COVID-19 created challenges in detecting and responding to hospital outbreaks. Developing a low-resource outbreak tracking system helped identify outbreak types and triggers that warranted early or aggressive interventions. Understanding the characteristics of hospital outbreaks was critical for maximizing infection control resources during surges of infectious disease outbreaks, such as COVID-19. Hospitals or local health departments could adapt this system to meet their needs.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None