Dopant Activation Depth Profiling for Highly Doped Si:P By Scanning Spreading Resistance Microscopy (SSRM) and Differential Hall Effect Metrology (DHEM)
Authors: Celano Umberto , Wouters Lennaert , Franquet Alexis , Spampinato Valentina , van der Heide Paul , Schaekers Marc , Joshi Abhijeet , Basol Bulent M 
Published: July 2022

Heavily n-doped epitaxially grown Si layers are of great importance for source/drain (S/D) application in advanced node nMOS devices. For contact resistivity reduction, the dopant activation level is very important. Various techniques are being used to evaluate dopant activation in Si:P layers. Among these two methods are Scanning Spreading Resistance Microscopy (SSRM) and Differential Hall Effect Metrology (DHEM). SSRM uses an atomic force microscope equipped with a hard conductive probe that is scanned in contact mode on the cross-sectioned sample’s surface and measures spreading resistance. Measured resistance values as a function of depth are converted into resistivity and carrier concentration depth profiles using calibration measurements and conversion relationships. DHEM provides depth profiles of mobility, resistivity and carrier concentration through a semiconductor layer by making successive sheet resistance (Rs) and Hall voltage measurements using Hall effect/Van der Pauw techniques, as the electrically active thickness of the layer is reduced through successive oxidation steps. Controlled oxidation is achieved by electrochemical anodization. Data collected can then be processed to yield the depth profiles. In this contribution we have carried out SSRM and DHEM measurements on Si:P epi layers subjected to different processing conditions including annealing and ohmic contact fabrication. Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) was used to measure the total (active + inactive) dopant profiles through the films. Effects of these processes on dopant diffusion and activation were studied and the results from DHEM and SSRM were compared.
In-situ phosphorus (P) doped Si epi-layers were grown over 300mm diameter boron doped monitor wafers. While one set was kept as the reference, a second set was treated by a spike-annealing process at 1000 °C. In a third set a Ti/TiN contact fabrication process was carried out and the contact was removed before analysis. In the fourth set contact process was applied to the spike annealed wafer before removal of the Ti/TiN layers. Bulk sheet resistance measurements were made using 4-point probe (4PP) for all the samples. SSRM measurements were carried out at IMEC. Cross-shaped Van der Pauw test-patterns were formed on 8mmx8mm areas on the samples and DHEM measurements were performed at ALP.
Figure below shows the dopant depth profiles obtained by SIMS and the carrier concentration profiles from DHEM and SSRM techniques for samples D02 (as deposited Si:P) and D03 (spike annealed). One can make some general observations from the data in this figure. The total dopant concentration as measured by SIMS is ~ 1.4E21/cm3. There is only a small difference in the total dopant distribution profiles (SIMS) between the as deposited sample and the spike annealed sample. However, the spike annealed sample shows much higher dopant activation as measured by DHEM. Carrier concentration is ~2.5x higher in sample D03 (~5E20/cm3) compared to sample D02 (~2E20/cm3). Activation levels measured by SSRM, however, are lower for both samples, and the peak carrier concentration value increases only slightly upon spike annealing, going from ~2E20/cm3 in sample D02 to ~2.2E20/cm3 in sample D03. DHEM clearly indicates the sharp interface between the p-type substrate and the n-type epi-layer and its depth calibration agrees well with the expected thicknesses of the epi layers. The tail of the SSRM data is much more graded. Data from other samples will be presented and discussed in the final manuscript.

Figure 1