Results of a phase II trial of the PARP inhibitor, niraparib, in BAP1 and other DNA damage response pathway deficient neoplasms.
Authors: George Thomas J. , Lee Ji-Hyun , Hosein Peter Joel , DeRemer David L. , Chatzkel Jonathan Alexander , Ramnaraign Brian Hemendra , Rogers Sherise C. , Markham Merry Jennifer , Daily Karen Colleen , Ezenwajiaku Nkiruka , Li Derek , Murphy Martina Cathryn , Franke Aaron J , Staal Stephen , Close Julia Lee , Jones Dennie V. , Allegra Carmen Joseph 
Published: June 2022

3122 Background: BRCA1-Associated Protein 1 (BAP1) acts as a tumor suppressor and critical regulator of the cell cycle and DNA damage response (DDR). PARP inhibitors (PARPi) demonstrate synthetic lethality in BAP1 mutant (mBAP1) preclinical models, independent of underlying germline BRCA status. mBAP1 leads to a loss of functional protein in several solid tumors. This study aimed to explore the clinical activity of niraparib in patients (pts) with advanced tumors likely to harbor mBAP1. Methods: Eligible adult pts with measurable metastatic solid tumors having exhausted approved therapies, adequate organ function, and ECOG PS 0-1 were assigned to Cohort A (histology-specific): tumors likely to harbor mBAP1 (i.e., cholangiocarcinoma, uveal melanoma, mesothelioma, or clear cell renal cell carcinoma) with tissue available for mBAP1 confirmation; or Cohort B (histology-agnostic): tumors with other known non-BRCA confirmed DDR mutations. Known BRCA1 or 2 mutations or prior PARPi exposure were excluded. All pts received niraparib 200-300mg daily, depending on weight and/or platelet count. Radiographic response was assessed by RECIST v1.1 measured every 8 weeks while on treatment. The primary endpoint was ORR with secondary endpoints of PFS, OS, clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD), toxicity, and exploratory biomarker determinations. Cohort A employed Simon's optimal two-stage design to assess a 30% ORR increase (a = 0.05; power = 90%). Cohort B aimed to assess a 40% ORR increase for this molecularly selected/enriched patient population. Results: From 08/13/2018 to 12/21/2021, 37 pts enrolled from two different centers, with 32 evaluable for response (Cohort A n = 18; Cohort B n = 14). In Cohort A, best ORR was 1 PR (6%), 8 SD (44%; median 5.7 mo; range 2 - 9.4 mo), and 9 PD (50%). Cohort A was stopped at the first stage following the pre-specified Simon’s design. mBAP1 was confirmed in 7/9 pts (78%) with PR or SD but in only 2/9 (22%) in those with PD. In Cohort B, best ORR was 6 SD (43%; median 7.5 mo; range 3.3 - 8.6 mo) and 8 PD (57%). Mutations in those with SD included ATM, CHEK2, PTEN, RAD50, and ARID1A. Common grade 3/4 AEs observed were anemia (16%), thrombocytopenia (16%), nausea (11%), and vomiting (8%). There were no unexpected nor grade 5 toxicities. Conclusions: The use of niraparib was well tolerated in pts with advanced treatment refractory solid tumors but failed to meet pre-specified efficacy threshold of ORR. However, clinical benefit was identified in 78% of patients in cohort A who had a confirmed mBAP1 tumor. Further correlative analyses are ongoing and additional clinical development restricted to mBAP1 tumors may be justified. Clinical trial information: NCT03207347.