Effectiveness of Goal-Directed and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives for Weight Loss in Primary Care Patients With Obesity Living in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Neighborhoods
Authors: Ladapo Joseph A. , Orstad Stephanie L. , Wali Soma , Wylie-Rosett Judith , Tseng Chi-Hong , Chung Un Young Rebecca , Cuevas Miguel A. , Hernandez Christina , Parraga Susan , Ponce Robert , Sweat Victoria , Wittleder Sandra , Wallach Andrew B. , Shu Suzanne B. , Goldstein Noah J. , Dapkins Isaac , Jay Melanie 
Published: December 2022

ImportanceFinancial incentives for weight management may increase use of evidence-based strategies while addressing obesity-related economic disparities in low-income populations.ObjectiveTo examine the effects of 2 financial incentive strategies developed using behavioral economic theory when added to provision of weight management resources.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThree-group, randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2017 to May 2021 at 3 hospital-based clinics in New York City, New York, and Los Angeles, California. A total of 1280 adults with obesity living in low-income neighborhoods were invited to participate, and 668 were enrolled.InterventionsParticipants were randomly assigned to goal-directed incentives, outcome-based incentives, or a resources-only group. The resources-only group participants were given a 1-year commercial weight-loss program membership, self-monitoring tools (digital scale, food journal, and physical activity monitor), health education, and monthly one-on-one check-in visits. The goal-directed group included resources and linked financial incentives to evidence-based weight-loss behaviors. The outcome-based arm included resources and linked financial incentives to percentage of weight loss. Participants in the incentive groups could earn up to $750.Main Outcomes and MeasuresProportion of patients achieving 5% or greater weight loss at 6 months.ResultsThe mean (SD) age of the 668 participants enrolled was 47.7 (12.4) years; 541 (81.0%) were women, 485 (72.6%) were Hispanic, and 99 (14.8%) were Black. The mean (SD) weight at enrollment was 98.96 (20.54) kg, and the mean body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was 37.95 (6.55). At 6 months, the adjusted proportion of patients who lost at least 5% of baseline weight was 22.1% in the resources-only group, 39.0% in the goal-directed group, and 49.1% in the outcome-based incentive group (difference, 10.08 percentage points [95% CI, 1.31-18.85] for outcome based vs goal directed; difference, 27.03 percentage points [95% CI, 18.20-35.86] and 16.95 percentage points [95% CI, 8.18-25.72] for outcome based or goal directed vs resources only, respectively). However, mean percentage of weight loss was similar in the incentive arms. Mean earned incentives was $440.44 in the goal-directed group and $303.56 in the outcome-based group, but incentives did not improve financial well-being.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, outcome-based and goal-directed financial incentives were similarly effective, and both strategies were more effective than providing resources only for clinically significant weight loss in low-income populations with obesity. Future studies should evaluate cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03157713