bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Autologous CD19-directed CAR T cells produced by novel PrimeCARmanufacture platform exhibit safety, efficacy, and long persistence profiles in relapsed/refractory B-lineage acute leukemia (r/r B-ALL).
Authors: Li Shiqi , Yang Zhi , Chen Zucong , Li Yu , Liu Lin , Yuan Zhongtao , Zhang Yingzi , Luo Le , Fang Lihua , Chen Yingnian , Zhang Qianzhen , Shen Junjie , Li Yunyan , Wang Linling , Wang Meiling , Zhu Wei , Wang Sanbin , Qian Cheng 
Published: June 2022

7008 Background: CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has shown promising efficacy in the r/r B-ALL. However, the life-threatening side effects especially high grades of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) limited its wide application. To overcome these limitations, we established a novel PrimeCAR platform based on moderate activation and short expansion to manufacture MC-1-50, an autologous CD19-directed CAR T cell. Our preclinical study showed that MC-1-50 exerted a great efficacy and less cytokines secretion. Methods: In this Phase I /II study (NCT04271410), CAR T cells were manufactured by PrimeCAR platform, which reduces manufacture periods to about 2 days. T cells were transducted with a lentiviral vector encoding a humanized CD19 specific scFv following 4-1BB and CD3ζ cytoplasmic domain. Patients (pts) received single-dose of MC-1-50 at dose level 1 (1×105 CAR+/kg), level 2 (3×105 CAR+/kg), and level 3 (1×107 CAR+ totally, ranged 1.67-3.85×105 CAR+/kg). Pts were pre-conditioned with fludarabine (25-30 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (200-300 mg/m2) daily for 3 days. Toxicity was graded by CTCAE, CRS and ICANS were graded by ASTCT criteria. Results: As of Feb 10, 2022, 13 pts with r/r B-ALL were infused with MC-1-50. Disease characteristics and outcomes are shown in the table. No DLTs were reported. Eleven pts (84%) experienced CRS, including 7 (54%) at grade 1 and 4 (30%) at grade 2, no ≥ 3 CRS were observed. One pts (7%) experienced grade 1 ICANS, no ≥ 2 ICANS occurred. The Tmax for IL-6 was detected around day 11 (123.3±165.16 pg/ml). There were similar low secretion features of other cytokines, which is consistent with low CRS and ICANS. In all dose levels, 13 pts finished 1M evaluation and the CR rate in 1M is 100%. Four pts finished 3M evaluation and the CR rate in 3M is 75%, 1 pts relapsed at the month 3 with CD19 mutation. One pts had a CR statue at the month 11. Cmax for CAR copy number in 3 dose levels are similar and the average number of Cmax of CAR is 275901.6 copies/ug genomic DNA. Conclusions: PrimeCAR platform could produce CAR T cells in very short time with high percentage of Tscm. Treatment of r/r B-ALL at very low dose resulted in excellent safety profile, while exhibited a promising efficacy. That make this PrimeCAR platform potential for outpatient administration in the future. Clinical trial information: NCT04271410. [Table: see text]
Epcoritamab (epco) with gemcitabine + oxaliplatin (GemOx) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) induces high response rate even in pts failing CAR T therapy.
Authors: Brody Joshua , Wahlin Bjorn E. , Phillips Tycel Jovelle , Costello Régis , Lugtenburg Pieternella , Cordoba Raul , Wang Liwei , Wu Jun , Elliott Brian , Abbas Aqeel , Jørgensen Judit 
Published: June 2022

7527 Background: Pts with R/R DLBCL who fail or are ineligible for ASCT have very poor outcomes with standard palliative chemotherapy. Rituximab + GemOx had a complete response rate of 33% (Cazelles et al, Leuk Lymphoma 2021); novel approaches are needed. Epco is a subcutaneously administered bispecific antibody targeting CD3 on T cells and CD20 on B cells. In the EPCORE NHL-1 dose-escalation trial, epco had manageable safety and antitumor activity in heavily pretreated B-cell NHL including DLBCL. EPCORE NHL-2 is a phase 1/2 trial evaluating epco + standard B-cell NHL therapies; shown here are results from arm 5 (NCT04663347). Methods: Adults with R/R CD20+ DLBCL who failed or were ineligible for ASCT received epco (QW, cycle [C] 1–3; Q2W, C4–9; Q4W, C≥10) and GemOx (Q2W, C1–4) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (28 d/C). Step-up epco dosing and prophylactic corticosteroids were required in C1 to mitigate CRS. Response was assessed by PET-CT per Lugano 2014 criteria. Results: As of Dec 1, 2021, 27 pts (median age, 71 y; range, 47–87 y) had received epco + GemOx (epco 24 mg, n=3; 48 mg, n=24). Most were stage IV (56%), primary refractory (56%), and refractory to last therapy (70%). Median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1–13). Median follow-up was 6.0 mo (range, 1.0–11.1), with treatment (Tx) ongoing in 16 pts (59%). The most common Tx-emergent AEs were CRS (70%), thrombocytopenia (70%), neutropenia (56%), anemia (52%), and infections (52%). CRS events were all grade (G) 1/2, with most cases occurring in C1; all cases resolved. One pt had ICANS (G3); 1 pt had tumor lysis syndrome (G3). Six pts (22%) had G5 AEs; investigator could not rule out contribution of epco in 2 pts: small bowel perforation in pt (72 y) with transformed DLBCL and extensive gastrointestinal involvement (had complete metabolic response [CMR]); acute hepatitis/multiorgan failure in pt (68 y) with transformed DLBCL and liver involvement (had CMR). Of 4 pts with fatal AEs unrelated to epcoritamab by investigator, 2 (87 y) had primary refractory disease and 2 (74 y) had multiple comorbidities. Response is shown in the Table. At the time of data cut, 65% of responders remained in response with the longest duration of response 6.9 mo. All 3 pts with prior CAR T remained on Tx and in response (2 CMR and 1 partial metabolic response [PMR]). Conclusions: When considering individual safety profiles of epco or GemOx, no unexpected safety findings were observed for epco + GemOx. In this R/R population with high unmet need, these initial data are encouraging and warrant further clinical evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT04663347. [Table: see text]
First-in-human phase I study of a ROR1-targeting bispecific T-cell engager (NVG-111) shows evidence of efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL and MCL.
Authors: Jasani Parag , Townsend William , Asher Samir , Tayabali Sarrah , Tucker David , Cook Sarah , Batten Toby , Granger David , Shah Mittal , O'Donovan Kieran , Nathwani Amit C. 
Published: June 2022

7535 Background: NVG-111 is a first in class, humanized, tandem scFv ROR1xCD3 bispecific T cell engager that mediates potent killing of ROR1+ tumours by engaging an epitope on the Frizzled domain of ROR1 and redirecting T cell activity via the CD3 binder. Methods: This phase I/II study is evaluating NVG-111 in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL and MCL who have received ≥2 prior systemic therapies and have achieved a stable, or partial response to the last line of therapy. NVG-111 was delivered as continuous intravenous (cIV) infusion over 21 days per cycle, with each patient typically receiving 3 cycles of treatment. The first 3 single patient cohorts were subjected to accelerated dose titration (ADT) over a range of 0.3-30µg/day. Dose-escalation steps in the subsequent, multi-patient, cohorts were determined using a continuous reassessment method with overdose control. The primary endpoints are safety and determination of MTD/RP2D. Secondary objectives are pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and anti-tumor activity, assessed by multicolor flow cytometry to quantitate minimal residual disease (MRD4). Results: As of January 2022, six patients (all males, median age 60 years) had been enrolled to the study; three into each of the ADT cohorts and the remaining into a 30 µg/day flat dosing cohort. Five patients had CLL, and one had MCL, with all subjects remaining on ibrutinib whilst receiving NVG-111. The most common adverse events were Grade 1 lethargy, headaches, nausea, vomiting and thrombocytopenia. All 3 patients exposed to a flat dose of NVG-111 at 30µg/day suffered Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) during week 1 of cycle 1. This did not require tocilizumab or dose interruption except in one patient who developed transient, grade 3 immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome-like symptoms (ICANS). CRS or ICANS was not observed in subsequent cycles of treatment at this dose level. Response was observed in all 5 evaluable patients who had completed efficacy assessment after 3 cycles of NVG-111. Amongst these, 2 patients had undetectable MRD in the blood with one being MRD negative in the bone marrow. Dose escalation is ongoing, including exploration of step-up dosing. Conclusions: Early data with NVG-111 shows promising efficacy with a predictable and manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT04763083.
Real-world analysis of safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with lymphoma with decreased renal function.
Authors: Mamlouk Omar , Strati Paolo , Feng Lei , Sun Ryan , Steiner Raphael Eric , Nair Ranjit , Flowers Christopher , Ramdial Jeremy L , Saini Neeraj , Srour Samer Ali , Champlin Richard E. , Kebriaei Partow , Nastoupil Loretta J. , Rodriguez Maria Alma , Shpall Elizabeth J. , Nieto Yago , Westin Jason , Neelapu Sattva Swarup , Mandayam Sreedhar , Ahmed Sairah 
Published: June 2022

7536 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) is approved for treatment of relapsed and refractory large B cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL), however eligibility for patients (pts) treated on clinical trials included normal kidney function (NKF). There is a gap in knowledge regarding the safety and efficacy of CART in pts with reduced kidney function (RKF), despite the prevalence of chronic kidney disease in lymphoma pts. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of adult pts with r/r LBCL who received CART between 2017-2021. RKF was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of < 60 ml/min and NKF defined as GFR ≥ 60 ml/min, at time of lymphodepletion chemotherapy (LDC). Increased length of ICU stay define as > 3 days. Kaplan-Meier method used to estimate the time-to-event endpoints including progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: We identified 210 pts who received CART, of those 169 (80.5%) had NKF and 41(19.5%) had RKF (15-59 ml/min, 27% < 45). Median age of pts was 60 and 63% of RKF pts were older than 60 vs 45% in NKF group (p = 0.03). Median Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) score of pts with RKF was higher than NKF (3 vs. 1, P = 0.004). Pts with RKF had significantly longer ICU length of stay (29.3% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.01). There was no difference in grade 3 hematological toxicity (82.9% vs. 84.5%, p = 0.80) or infection within 30 days of CART (51.2% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.11) between RKF and NKF pts, respectively. CART specific toxicity including grade and frequency of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity was also not related to renal function. After a median follow-up of 22.9 months (95% CI: 21.1-25.6 months), there was no significant difference in PFS and OS when comparing pts with RKF vs. NKF; PFS at 1 year of 31% (19-50%) vs. 33% (26-41%), p = 0.97, and OS at 1 year was 47% (34-67%) vs. 44% (37-57%), p = 0.45, and respectively. However, pts with RKF had a significant increase in non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 months (19.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.03), and at 6 months (22% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.02), respectively. Conclusions: In this retrospective single center study we observed reassuring durable remission rates in pts with r/r LBCL and RKF who received CART, without significantly different PFS or OS. Interestingly our analysis found that increased ICU length of stay and higher rates of NRM early after CART were associated with RKF. While our data shows RKF does not preclude pts from receiving CART for r/r LBCL, it does suggest that patients with RKF may need closer monitoring and multidisciplinary management.
Safety and clinical activity of belantamab mafodotin with pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): DREAMM-4 Study.
Authors: Suvannasankha Attaya , Bahlis Nizar J. , Trudel Suzanne , Weisel Katja , Koenecke Christian , Oriol Rocafiguera Albert , Voorhees Peter M. , Alonso Aránzazu Alonso , Callander Natalie Scott , Mateos Maria-Victoria , Reddy Nishitha , Hakim Shawn , Patel Nashita , Williams Danae , Jewell Roxanne C. , Zhou Xiangdong , Gupta Ira V. , Nooka Ajay K. 
Published: June 2022

8018 Background: Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; BLENREP), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) targeted antibody–drug conjugate approved for adult patients with RRMM, has a multimodal mechanism that eliminates myeloma cells via direct cytotoxicity and a systemic anti-tumor immune response, which may be augmented by an immune checkpoint inhibitor. DREAMM-4 (NCT03848845) assessed safety and clinical activity of belamaf with pembrolizumab (pembro) in RRMM. Methods: This was a Phase I/II, single-arm, open-label study of adults with RRMM after ≥3 lines of therapy (LOT, including anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, proteasome inhibitor, and immunomodulator). Part 1 established the dose of belamaf 2.5 mg/kg with pembro 200 mg, both IV Q3W up to 35 cycles, for the Part 2 expansion. Primary efficacy endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR, ≥partial response [PR] per IMWG criteria by investigator). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs) per NCI-CTCAE v4.03, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: This primary analysis of all treated pts (as of Oct 18, 2021) included 34 pts (6 in Part 1 and 28 in Part 2). In both parts, median prior LOT was 5 (range 3–13); 10 pts (29%) had high-risk cytogenetics and 9 (26%) had extramedullary disease. ORR was 47%, with most responses (10/16 pts) ≥ very good PR (VGPR, Table). Median follow-up was 14.7 months (mo); median (95% CI) DoR was 8.0 (2.1–not reached) mo; median PFS was 3.4 (1.4–5.6) mo. Most pts had ≥1 AE (any grade [Gr]: 97%; Gr ≥3: 74%) and treatment-related AE (TRAE, any Gr: 97%; Gr ≥3: 65%). Most common (≥35%) AEs were keratopathy (any Gr: 76%; Gr ≥3: 38%), vision blurred (any Gr: 38%; Gr ≥3: 0%), and thrombocytopenia (any Gr: 35%; Gr ≥3: 29%). AEs led to dose delays (65%) and dose reductions (32%), but not discontinuation. Nine pts had a serious AE (SAE); 4 pts had ≥1 SAE related to study treatment. Two pts had immune-related AEs of Gr 1 (gout and autoimmune hypothyroidism). Preliminary PK and soluble BCMA data were consistent with single-agent belamaf therapy. Conclusions: Belamaf + pembro demonstrated a favorable ORR compared with single-agent belamaf in heavily pre-treated RRMM. No new TRAEs were identified; AE frequency and severity were similar to single-agent belamaf. Correlative biomarker studies are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03848845. [Table: see text]
Time to response, duration of response, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with daratumumab (DARA) plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): Subgroup analysis of the phase 3 MAIA study.
Authors: Facon Thierry , Kumar Shaji , Plesner Torben , Moreau Philippe , Bahlis Nizar J. , Goldschmidt Hartmut , O'Dwyer Michael , Perrot Aurore , Venner Christopher P. , Weisel Katja , Mace Joseph R. , Raje Noopur S. , Tiab Mourad , Macro Margaret , Frenzel Laurent , Leleu Xavier , Pei Huiling , Borgsten Fredrik , Usmani Saad Zafar 
Published: June 2022

8044 Background: In the phase 3 MAIA study, adding DARA to Rd improved progression-free survival (primary endpoint), overall survival, duration of response, and PROs in transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM. We report a MAIA subgroup analysis of time to response, duration of response, and PROs. Methods: Transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM received 28-day cycles of Rd (R 25 mg PO on Days 1-21; d 40 mg PO QW) ± DARA (16 mg/kg IV QW in Cycles 1-2, Q2W in Cycles 3-6, and Q4W thereafter) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Secondary endpoints included time to response and duration of response. PROs were measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30, with treatment effects assessed via mixed-effects model with repeated measures. Results: In total, 368 pts were assigned to the D-Rd group and 369 pts to the Rd group; 162 (44%) D-Rd pts and 142 (38%) Rd pts had renal impairment (defined as baseline CrCl ≤60 mL/min). At a 56.2-mo median follow-up, median times to very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) and complete response or better (≥CR) were shorter with D-Rd vs Rd in the overall study population and in the subgroups of pts with and without renal impairment (Table). Among pts who achieved ≥CR or partial response or better (≥PR), higher proportions of D-Rd vs Rd pts had not experienced disease progression at 48 mo (Table). Among pts with renal impairment, greater improvements from baseline in pt-reported pain, fatigue, and nausea and vomiting symptom scores were observed with D-Rd vs Rd across most timepoints; a notably greater meaningful reduction in pain symptom score was seen with D-Rd vs Rd as early as Cycle 6 Day 1 (least squares mean change from baseline, −14.9 vs −7.0; P=0.0241). Analyses for additional pt subgroups will be presented. Conclusions: In transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM, D-Rd showed more rapid deep responses as well as more durable responses vs Rd, regardless of renal function. Improvements in pt-reported symptoms were generally greater with D-Rd vs Rd in pts with renal impairment. Our results support the use of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM. Clinical trial information: NCT02252172. [Table: see text]
Comparison of quality of life in patients randomized to high-dose once daily (QD) thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) with standard twice daily (BID) TRT in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) on CALGB 30610 (Alliance, Sub-study CALGB 70702).
Authors: Ganti Apar Kishor , Dueck Amylou C. , Fruth Briant , Rimner Andreas , Waqar Saiama Naheed , Mix Michael D , Petty William J. , Bogart Jeffrey A 
Published: June 2022

8504 Background: The CALGB 30610 trial demonstrated that 70Gy QD TRT was not associated with a superior overall survival compared to standard BID 45Gy TRT in limited stage small cell lung cancer. Since both arms appeared to provide similar clinical benefit, other factors such as quality of life may help oncologists decide on the best treatment approach for their patients. The present analysis was conducted to compare patients’ quality of life between these regimens in terms of their physical symptoms, physical functioning and psychological state. Methods: In the CALGB 30610 planned sub-study CALGB 70702, patients were administered the FACT-L, FACT Trial Outcome Index-Lung Cancer (FACT-L TOI), FACT-Esophageal Cancer Eating and Swallowing Indices, ECOG Acute Esophagitis Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the EQ-5D at baseline and a single item assessing difficulty swallowing at baseline, 3, 5, 7, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after starting radiation therapy. Patients were also asked to assess treatment inconvenience at these time points. The primary endpoints of CALGB 70702 were FACT-L TOI and FACT eating and swallowing subscales at 12 weeks. Mean changes from baseline were compared between arms using general linear mixed models. Results: 417 patients consented to participate in the patient-reported outcomes substudy. The completion rate of the questionnaires was 87% at baseline and 71% at week 52. The FACT-L total score mean worsening was significantly less in the QD arm compared to the BID arm at week 3 (-1.0 vs -7.0; P=.003), and marginally less at week 5 (-5.3 vs -11.0; P=.06). The FACT-L TOI mean worsening was significantly less in the QD arm than in the BID arm at week 3 (-2.9 vs -7.6; P=.003) and greater at week 12 (-7.6 vs -2.8; P=.03). The QD arm also had a lesser EQ-5D index mean worsening at 3 weeks (-0.04 vs 0.03; P=.002). Mean increase in the acute esophagitis score (1.06 vs 2.89; P<.001) and difficulty swallowing (0.39 vs 1.14; P<.001) were significantly greater in the BID arm at week 3. Mean worsening in HADS anxiety was significantly less in the QD arm at week 5 (-1.99 vs -0.95; P=.03). There were no other significant differences at the remaining timepoints between the two arms. Across visits on the QD arm, patients felt that treatment was inconvenient at 26% (96/376) assessments, compared to 33% (116/352) in the BID arm (chi-sq P=.03). Conclusions: Both radiation regimens were well tolerated. However, the QD arm had better quality of life scores at week 3 and was perceived to be less inconvenient. Clinical trial information: NCT00632853.
Two-year update from KEYNOTE-799: Pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT) for unresectable, locally advanced, stage III NSCLC.
Authors: Reck Martin , Lee Ki Hyeong , Frost Nicolaj , Breder Valeriy Vladimirovich , Kowalski Dariusz , Levchenko Evgeny , Reguart Noemi , Martinez-Marti Alex , Houghton Baerin , Paoli Jean-Baptiste , Safina Sufiia , Komiya Takefumi , Sanford Amy , Liu Hong , Song Andrew J. , Keller Steven M. , Jabbour Salma K. 
Published: June 2022

8508 Background: Primary analysis (database cutoff, Oct 28, 2020) of the global KEYNOTE-799 study (NCT03631784) in patients (pts) with unresectable, locally advanced stage III NSCLC, showed that pembrolizumab (pembro; anti–PD-1) plus cCRT resulted in an ORR of 70.5% in cohort A (n = 112; squamous and nonsquamous) and 70.6% in cohort B (n = 102; nonsquamous only) and grade ≥3 pneumonitis in 9 (8.0%) and 7 (6.9%) pts, respectively. We present updated outcomes with 1 y of additional follow-up. Methods: In this nonrandomized, phase 2 study, eligible pts were aged ≥18 y with previously untreated, unresectable, pathologically confirmed, stage IIIA-C NSCLC with measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. Pts in cohort A (squamous and nonsquamous) received carboplatin AUC 6 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and pembro 200 mg for one 3-wk cycle, followed by carboplatin AUC 2 plus paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 QW for 6 wks plus 2 cycles of pembro 200 mg Q3W plus standard thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). Pts in cohort B (nonsquamous) received 3 cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m2, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, and pembro 200 mg Q3W plus standard TRT in cycles 2 and 3. All pts received 14 additional cycles of pembro 200 mg Q3W. Primary endpoints were ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and the incidence of grade ≥3 pneumonitis (per NCI CTCAE v4.0). Results: Of 216 pts enrolled in this study, 112 in cohort A and 102 in cohort B received treatment. Median (range) time from first dose to database cutoff (Oct 18, 2021) was 30.2 (25.3–35.5) mo in cohort A and 25.4 (14.5–35.2) mo in cohort B. ORR (95% CI) was 71.4% (62.1%–79.6%) in cohort A and 75.5% (66.0%–83.5%) in cohort B. Median duration of response (DOR) and OS were not reached (NR) in both cohorts; median PFS was 30.6 mo in cohort A, and NR in cohort B (Table). ORR was 66.7% in pts with PD-L1 TPS <1% and 77.3% in pts with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% in cohort A and 78.6% and 72.5%, respectively, in cohort B. ORR was similar by histology (squamous, 72.0%; nonsquamous, 74.1%). Grade ≥3 pneumonitis occurred in 16 pts (7.5%) overall; 9 pts (8.0%) in cohort A and 7 (6.9%) in cohort B. Treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 64.3% and 51.0% of pts in cohort A and B, respectively. Conclusions: With the accrual of additional responses after >2 y of follow-up, pembro plus cCRT continues to demonstrate robust and durable responses, regardless of PD-L1 TPS and tumor histology, promising survival outcome and manageable safety in pts with previously untreated, locally advanced stage III NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03631784. [Table: see text]