bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Results of a phase 1b study of osimertinib plus sapanisertib or alisertib for osimertinib-resistant, EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Authors: Elamin Yasir Y , Negrao Marcelo Vailati , Fossella Frank V. , Byers Lauren Averett , Zhang Jianjun , Gay Carl Michael , Tu Janet Chen , Pozadzides Jenny Vu , Tran Hai T. , Lu Charles , Feng Lei , Spelman Amy R. , Blumenschein George R. , Tsao Anne S. , Heymach John 
Published: June 2022

9105 Background: The aurora kinase and mTOR pathways are implicated in resistance to EGFR inhibitor osimertinib. Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of the aurora kinase inhibitor alisertib and the mTOR inhibitor sapanisertib in combination with osimertinib. Methods: This is a phase 1b study with dose finding and expansion portions (NCT04479306). The dose finding portion used a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design to assess two arms: osimertinib 80 mg daily in combination with alisertib 20 mg, 30 mg, and 40 mg daily day 1-21 of 28-day cycle (osi-ali arm) and osimertinib 80 mg daily in combination with sapanisertib 2 mg and 3 mg daily (osi-sapa arm). Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were predefined in the protocol. Patients with EGFR (L858R/exon 19 deletion) mutant NSCLC whose disease have progressed on osi and up to one additional line of systemic therapy were assigned, at investigator discretion, to either study arm. Tumor biopsy was mandatory at study entry and optional upon progression. Results: As of February 1, 2022, 40 patients are enrolled (20 in each arm). One DLT was observed in each arm: grade 3 nausea in ali-osi arm and grade 3 AST elevation in osi-sapa arm. Grade 3 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 10% of each arm, and no grade 4 TEAEs were observed. The most common TEAEs in osi-ali arm was leucopenia (45%) and anemia (35%) while in osi-sapa arm, hyperglycemia (45%) and stomatitis (40%). In osi-ali arm (n = 20), median progression free survival (mPFS) was 1.9 months while objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 5% (95% CI: 0.1 ̃ 24.9%) and 40% (95% CI: 19.1 ̃ 63.9%), respectively. In osi-sapa arm (n = 16, evaluated for response to date), mPFS was 4.6 months while ORR and DCR were 12.5% (95% CI: 1.6 ̃ 38.3%) and 68.7% (95% CI: 35.7 ̃ 82.7%), respectively. Conclusions: Osimertinib with alisertib or sapanisertib is well tolerated in osimertinib-resistant, EGFR mutant NSCLC. The sapanisertib combination, but not the alisertib combination, demonstrates antitumor activity suggesting that mTOR inhibition warrants further exploration in this population. Biomarker analysis is ongoing to identify the molecular determinants of response and resistance to sapasertib. Clinical trial information: NCT04479306.
Nivolumab (NIVO) + relatlimab (RELA) versus NIVO in previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma: OS and ORR by key subgroups from RELATIVITY-047.
Authors: Tawbi Hussein A. , Hodi F. Stephen , Lipson Evan J. , Schadendorf Dirk , Ascierto Paolo Antonio , Matamala Luis , Salman Pamela , Gutiérrez Erika Castillo , Rutkowski Piotr , Gogas Helen , Lao Christopher D. , Janoski De Menezes Juliana , Dalle Stéphane , Arance Ana Maria , Grob Jean-Jacques , Keidel Sarah , Jonczak Karin , Sobiesk Anne Marie , Dolfi Sonia , Long Georgina V. 
Published: June 2022

9505 Background: In the phase 2/3 RELATIVITY-047 trial, NIVO + RELA as a fixed-dose combination (FDC) significantly improved the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) versus NIVO in patients (pts) with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma. Secondary endpoints showed a clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS), although not statistically significant, and a higher objective response rate (ORR). As previously reported, PFS and OS favored NIVO + RELA over NIVO across prespecified stratification factors (LAG-3 expression, PD-L1 expression, BRAF V600 mutation status, and metastasis stage). Here we report the first disclosure of ORR analyzed by prespecified stratification factors and OS and ORR in additional subgroups. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive NIVO 480 mg + RELA 160 mg FDC or NIVO 480 mg intravenously Q4W. The primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST v1.1 assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints were OS and ORR by BICR, tested in hierarchy. Exploratory analyses were performed for PFS, OS, and ORR by prespecified subgroups. Results: PFS continued to favor NIVO + RELA over NIVO across key subgroups. OS and ORR also favored NIVO + RELA over NIVO across key subgroups including those associated with poor prognosis (Table). ORR favored NIVO + RELA over NIVO for pts with LAG-3 expression ≥ 1% (47% vs 35%) and < 1% (31% vs 24%), PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% (53% vs 45%) and < 1% (36% vs 24%), and BRAF wild-type (43% vs 34%) and mutant (43% vs 31%) melanoma, respectively. Additional key prespecified subgroups will be presented. In all treated pts, NIVO + RELA maintained a manageable safety profile with no new or unexpected safety signals. Conclusions: NIVO + RELA was favored over NIVO across key subgroups for PFS, OS, and ORR, and findings appeared consistent with outcomes in the overall population. NIVO + RELA had a favorable benefit-risk profile. Clinical trial information: NCT03470922. [Table: see text]
First interim analysis of the SirTac trial: A randomized phase II study of SIRT and DSM-TACE in patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma.
Authors: Peuker Caroline-Anna Anna , De Bucourt Maximilian , Gebauer Bernhard , Amthauer Holger , Erxleben Christoph , Eucker Jan , Keller Ulrich , Leyvraz Serge , Joussen Antonia M. , Keilholz Ulrich , Ochsenreither Sebastian 
Published: June 2022

9511 Background: The liver is the most common site of metastases in patients (pts) with uveal melanoma (UM). Here, we present results from the prespecified first interim analysis of the SirTac trial, a prospective, single-center, randomized, investigator-initiated, open-label phase 2 study of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Yttrium-90-bearing resin microspheres; SIR-Spheres (SIRT) vs Transarterial Chemoembolization with Cisplatin and degradable starch microspheres; EmboCept S (DSM-TACE) in pts with liver-dominant metastatic UM. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed, liver-dominant metastatic UM and ECOG PS 0-2 were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to SIRT or DSM-TACE. Randomization was stratified by lactate dehydrogenase (<2x vs ≥2x upper limit of normal) and pre-treatment with antiangiogenic agents. Extrahepatic metastases were allowed, if asymptomatic. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 108 pts (54 per arm) were planned to be enrolled. Pts received TACE every 4-6 weeks until tumor devascularization or disease progression or intolerable toxicity was observed, and SIRT either as one whole-liver application or in two sequential sessions for each liver lobe. The primary objective of this prespecified analysis was to assess response by RECIST criteria v1.1 in the per-protocol (PP) population of the first 40 pts (20 pts in each arm). Results: Two patients had been treated with previous liver surgery, whereas all other patients had not received previous treatment for metastatic disease. There were no clinicopathological differences between the groups, except for a difference in age (median age SIRT arm 64 y vs 75 y in the TACE arm, p=0.018). All but 1 pt received treatment as randomized. This pt was excluded and replaced by the next TACE pt for this PP interim analysis. There were no differences in best overall response rates between the groups (no complete response, 1 partial response in both arms, stable disease in 19 (95%) and 17 (85%) pts in the SIRT and TACE arm, respectively, and 2 pts with progressive disease in the TACE arm). At a median follow-up of 13.9 mo from treatment start, median PFS in the PP population was 4.9 mo in the SIRT arm vs 2.2 mo in the TACE arm (p=0.037), with a higher median liver-PFS in the SIRT vs TACE arm (8.3 vs 2.2, p=0.026). Conclusions: In this planned interim analysis treatment in both arms was feasible with no differences in response. The explorativePFS analysis allows no conclusions on the final outcome after completion of the trial. The study continues recruitment. Clinical trial information: NCT02936388.
Phase II study of nivolumab (nivo) with relatlimab (rela) in patients (pts) with first-line advanced melanoma: Early on-treatment major pathologic response on biopsy.
Authors: Karapetyan Lilit , Karunamurthy Arivarasan , Cillo Anthony , Rohatgi Anjali , Massa Ryan Campbell , Gooding William E. , Najjar Yana G. , Davar Diwakar , Luke Jason J. , Bruno Tullia C. , Vignali Dario , Kirkwood John M. 
Published: June 2022

9514 Background: A phase II study of nivo and rela was designed to evaluate the antitumor activity and mechanism of this combination and components for first-line treatment of pts with advanced melanoma. Pts received lead-in treatment with 1 cycle of nivo (480mg IV q4wk), rela (160mg IV q4wk), or nivo-rela followed by combination therapy. We assessed the effect of each lead-in treatment on immune-related pathological response (irPR) at 4-wk biopsy to develop early biomarkers of antitumor response. Methods: Core biopsy of an index lesion was performed at baseline and after 4 wk on-treatment. Immune characteristics of pathological response were assessed on H&E sections, including presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), neovascularization, proliferative fibrosis, plasma cells, and lymphoid aggregates. irPR score was calculated as described by Stein JE et al Ann Oncol 2019, from 0 (no irPR features) to 3 (major pathologic response on biopsy [MPRbx], ≤10% residual viable tumor). We assessed the association between irPR and radiological response (RECIST v1.1) at 4-wk evaluations. Results: The current cohort includes 22 pts, median age = 67, male = 13. Pts were randomized to nivo = 7, rela = 7, and nivo-rela = 8 lead-in groups. Two pts had no irPR evaluation due to early progression and unscorable tumor. Among 20 evaluable pts, proliferative fibrosis, neovascularization, plasma cells, brisk TIL, and lymphoid aggregates were identified in 50%, 35%, 26.3%, 25%, and 5% of cases, respectively. Lead-in nivo (n = 2/6), rela (n = 0/6), and nivo-rela (n = 3/8) resulted in irPR = 3 in 25% of pts. Radiological response was identified as partial response (PR) = 1/22 (4.5%), stable disease (SD) = 12/22 (54.5%), and progressive disease (PD) = 9/22 (41%). Among pts with PD, 44% received rela-, 33% nivo-, and 22% nivo-rela- lead-in. Pts with irPR score = 3 had radiological PR = 1, SD = 3, and PD = 1 at 4wks. No association was found between MPRbx and radiological response at 4 wks. Conclusions: Four-wk MPRbx may serve as an early biomarker of treatment response in advanced melanoma. Lead-in treatment resulted in MPRbx of 25% and was greatest with nivo-rela lead-in. Correlations between 4 wk MPRbx and later radiological responses, survival and other endpoints will be made at completion of trial accrual. Clinical trial information: NCT03743766. [Table: see text]
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase 2 study.
Authors: Mao Lili , Fang Meiyu , Chen Yu , Bai Xue , Cao Jun , Lin Jing , Zhang Peng , Chen Ling , Xu Jiahui , Guo Jun , Si Lu 
Published: June 2022

9525 Background: Anti-programed cell death-1 (PD-1) monotherapy is a part of the standard therapy for cutaneous melanoma but has demonstrated low efficacy in mucosal melanoma. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as a first-line therapy in patients with advanced mucosal melanoma. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study utilized a Simon’s two-stage design. Atezolizumab (fixed-dose, 1200 mg) and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) were administered by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety with adverse events summarized using NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Results: In total, 43 patients were enrolled, including 20 (46.5%) with unresectable and 23 (53.5%) with metastatic mucosal melanoma. Median follow-up was 13.4 months at data cut-off (July 30, 2021). Forty patients were evaluable for response: In stage I analysis set (n=22), the best confirmed ORR according to RECIST v1.1 was 40.9% (9/22; 95% CI 20.7-63.7), including one CR and eight PRs. The ORR in the FAS population was 45.0% (95% CI, 29.3-61.5) (1 CR, 17 PRs) and the DCR was 65.0% (95% CI, 48.3-79.4). The median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 2.7-9.6), the 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 53.4% (95% CI, 36.6-67.6) and 28.1% (95% CI, 14.2-43.9), respectively. The median OS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 14.4-NR). The 6- and 12-month OS rates were 92.5% (95% CI, 78.5-97.5) and 76.0% (95% CI, 57.1-87.5), respectively. The median DOR was 12.5 months (95% CI, 5.5-NR). Overall, 90.7% (39/43) of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, and 25.6% (11/43) experienced grade ≥ 3 events. Conclusions: Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab showed promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced mucosal melanoma. Research Sponsor: Shanghai Roche Pharmaceuticals Ltd., China. Clinical trial information: NCT04091217.
Anti-LAG-3 antibody LBL-007 in combination with toripalimab in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma: A phase Ⅰ, open-label, multicenter, dose escalation/expansion study.
Authors: Bai Xue , Li Mei , Pu Xingxiang , Cheng Ying , Chen Jing , Jiang Yu , Chen Xue , Liu Jingjing , Fan Li , Guo Jun , Si Lu 
Published: June 2022

9538 Background: LBL007 is a novel, fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting human Lymphocyte-activation gene3 (LAG-3). Dual inhibition of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and LAG-3 is anticipated to synergistically increase immune response against tumor growth. Here we report the preliminary safety and efficacy of LBL-007 in combination with Toripalimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody has approved for treatment of melanoma in China) in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Methods: Pts with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with or without prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy were enrolled. This trial comprised 2 parts, namely part 1 (dose escalation), pts received LBL-007 (0.25/1/3/6 mg/kg) /Toripalimab (3 mg/kg) both i.v., Q2W; and part 2 (expansion), pts received LBL-007 (3/6 mg/kg)/Toripalimab (3 mg/kg) both i.v., Q2W. The primary objective was safety, the second objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy (per RECIST 1.1). Results: By Jan 2022, 37 pts (15 [40.5%] male, median age 59 [range 31-74] years, 9 pts [24.3%] with baseline LDH elevation, 18 [48.6%] with acral, 12 [32.4%] mucosal, 5 [13.5%] nonacral cutaneous, 2 [5.4%] primary site unknown) were enrolled, with 17 in part 1 and 20 in part 2. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in part 1, and the MTD was not reached. Of all 37 pts, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included anemia (24.3%), creatine phosphokinase elevation (24.3%), hypothyroidism (21.6%), and aspartate aminotransferase elevation (21.6%). For 32 radiologically evaluable pts, ORR was 12.5%, DCR was 53.1%. In a preplanned subtype-specific analysis in anti-PD-(L)1 treatment-naïve pts, ORR was 27.3 % vs. 0%, and DCR was 81.8% vs. 50.0% in acral and mucosal melanoma subtypes, respectively. For anti-PD-(L)1-resistant pts (n = 11), DCR was 18.2%. Conclusions: LBL007/Toripalimab combination is well tolerated and promising efficacy in pts with unresectable or metastatic melanoma, especially in the acral type without prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04640545.
SALVO: Single-arm trial of ipilimumab and nivolumab as adjuvant therapy for resected mucosal melanoma.
Authors: Kottschade Lisa A. , Pond Gregory Russell , Olszanski Anthony J. , Zakharia Yousef , Domingo-Musibay Evidio , Hauke Ralph J. , Curti Brendan D. , Schober Sarah , Milhem Mohammed M. , Block Matthew Stephen , McWilliams Robert R. 
Published: June 2022

9573 Background: Mucosal melanoma is a rare, highly aggressive form of melanoma with extremely high recurrence rates, despite definitive surgical resection. Median RFS has been reported to be 5.4m, with RFS rates at 1 and 2 years of 10%, and 0%, respectively (Lian B, Si L, Cui C, et al. Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing High-Dose IFN-α2b with Temozolomide Plus Cisplatin as Systemic Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Mucosal Melanoma. Clinical Cancer Research 2013, 19(16):4488-4498). Currently there is no consensus on recommendations for adjuvant therapy. Data on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) adjuvantly is lacking. Methods: We performed a single arm, multicenter clinical trial using “flip dose” ipilimumab (1mg/kg q3w x4 cycles),and nivolumab (3 mg.kg q3w x4 cycles), then Nivolumab 480 mg q4w x 11 cycles to complete a year of adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the study had 85% power to detect an improvement in RFS between 5.5 and 9.5 months using a one-sided log rank test. Participants must have had R0/R1 resection <90 days prior to registration, and no prior systemic therapy (adjuvant radiation allowed), ECOG 0/1, no uncontrolled significant autoimmune disease or other invasive cancer. Patients were recruited through the Midwest Melanoma Partnership/Hoosier Oncology Network. Results: From 9/17 to 8/21, 44 patients were approached at 6 centers. Of these 9 were ineligible, and 35 were enrolled. Of these, 29 (83%) had R0 resections, and 7 (20%) had adjuvant radiation prior to enrollment. As of Dec 2021, 31 patients have completed the treatment phase. Of the 35 patients treated on study, 20 patients have recurred (7 local, 5 distant, 3 regional, 5 sites unconfirmed), 6 stopped therapy due to adverse effects, and 8 have died. The mean age of patients was 65.8 years and 21 (60.0%) were female. The primary site of disease was vulvovaginal N=12 (32.4%) patients, sinonasal N= 11 (29.7%), anorectal N= 9 (24.3%) and other site N= 5 (13.5%). Adjuvant radiation had been given in 7 pts. Driver mutations were rare, with only 3 (8.6%) patients having a KIT mutation, and one patient (2.9%) each having a NRAS or BRAF mutation. RFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 50% (95% CI 31-66%) and 37% (95% CI 19-55%), with OS rates at 1 and 2 years of 87% (95% CI 68-95%) and 68% (95% CI 46-83%). Median RFS was 10.3 m (95% CI5.7-25.8). Most common grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (14%), hypertension (14%), hyponatremia (11%), with no grade 4/5 toxicities. Conclusions: Flip dose ipilimumab and nivolumab after resection is associated with outcomes improved over previously reported outcomes in the absence of therapy. Long term follow up is ongoing as are subgroup analyses and correlative studies. Clinical trial information: NCT03241186.
Analysis of the effect of systemic corticosteroids on survival from tebentafusp in a phase 3 trial of metastatic uveal melanoma.
Authors: Ikeguchi Alexandra , Sacco Joseph J. , Luke Jason J. , Evans T.R. Jeffry , Curti Brendan D. , Kim Kevin B. , Abdullah Shaad Essa , Watkins Claire , Karakuzu Ozgur , Nathan Paul D. 
Published: June 2022

9584 Background: All immune therapies that rapidly activate T cells, including T cell engagers, can induce cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Tebentafusp (tebe), a T cell receptor bispecific (gp100 x CD3) can also induce skin adverse events (AEs), due to gp100+ cutaneous melanocytes. CRS and skin AEs may require management with short term corticosteroids, which may also be used as premedication for subsequent tebe doses. Here we report the first analysis of systemic corticosteroid use and correlation with efficacy from a Phase (Ph) 3 trial for any T cell engager. Methods: Post hoc analyses were performed on the tebe arm of the Ph3 [NCT03070392] study in previously untreated HLA-A*02:01+ metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) (N = 245). Due to the low rate of severe AEs in Ph1 trials, prophylactic corticosteroids were not mandated. The association between overall survival (OS) and corticosteroid use (new start within 30 days of first tebe dose) was investigated using landmark analyses in the safety population. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for key patient characteristics and AEs of special interest: CRS, rash, and liver function test (LFT) elevation. Steroid type (hydrocortisone vs. others) and treatment duration (1 vs. > 1 day) were also investigated. Results: In the Ph3 trial, 64/245 (26%) patients received new systemic corticosteroid within 30 days after the first dose of tebe, mostly for treatment of AEs (56/64, 88%) or pre-medication due to previous AE (14/64, 22%). 25 of the 64 patients received corticosteroids only for a single day. The most frequent AEs (≥15%) were rash (18/64, 28%), CRS (15/64, 23%), and hypotension (12/64, 19%). In a logistic regression model, elevated baseline LDH, the dominant prognostic marker, was most strongly associated with use of corticosteroids (p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, corticosteroids were not associated with any significant OS difference (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.83-2.4, p = 0.2) and this effect did not differ in patients with or without CRS, rash or LFT elevation (all interaction tests p > 0.2). There was no difference in OS according to corticosteroid type or whether administered for 1 vs > 1 day. Conclusions: This is the first analysis from a phase 3 trial of the impact of systemic corticosteroids on survival for a T cell engaging cancer therapy. The vast majority of tebe-treated patients (84%) either did not require corticosteroids (74%) or only received them on a single day (10%). The most frequent reason for corticosteroid use was an emergent AE, including CRS and rash. Corticosteroid use following the pre-specified AE guidelines was not associated with any significant impact on OS. Clinical trial information: NCT03070392.