bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
An open label, nonrandomized, multisite phase II trial combining bevacizumab, atezolizumab, and rucaparib for the treatment of previously treated recurrent and progressive endometrial cancer.
Authors: Bradley William Hampton , Hayes Monica Prasad , Taylor Nicolas , Rader Janet Sue , Bishop Erin , Hopp Elizabeth , McAlarnen Lindsey Allison , Liegl Melodee , Simpson Pippa , Uyar Denise 
Published: June 2022

5510 Background: Patients with metastatic recurrent endometrial cancer have limited effective therapies. Single agent pembrolizumab is utilized in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) patients, while the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab is now more commonly used in MMR intact patients who have progressed after chemotherapy combinations. This trial investigated a novel three drug regimen. Methods: Patients with recurrent endometrial cancer not amenable to curative intent surgery or radiation after one or two lines of therapy were eligible regardless of histology. This study is a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized phase II trial. All subjects initially received the three-drug combination of rucaparib, bevacizumab, and atezolizumab. The primary goal of this trial was to estimate the overall response rate in these patients, and secondarily to estimate the progression-free and overall survival of patients treated with this triplet combination. Total enrollment was 30, with the first six subjects participated in a safety lead-in. Treatments until progression, toxicity, or clinician choice. Subjects could continue past progression if, in the estimate of the treating clinician and subject, clinical benefit was being provided. Subjects were eligible for analysis if they received at least one cycle and had one post-dose tumor assessment. The ORR assumption was 27% with a lower bound of 14%. Results: 30 subjects were enrolled between 07/2019 and 06/2021. Of these 26 were evaluable. Median follow up at cut off was 14.9 months. 23 subjects had clinical benefit, with 1 (4%) with CR, 9 (39%) with PR, and 13 (57%) with stable disease as best response. Overall median event-free (progression or death) was 5.3 (95% CI 2.7-7.9) months and overall survival 13.3 (95% CI NA) months at cut off. Median duration of therapy was 4.4 months (IQR 1.7-7.3), with 4 subjects remaining on study directed therapy at data cut off. Histology distribution was 50% serous, 20% endometrioid, and 13% carcinosarcoma. 19 pts were White, 8 African American, 2 identified as Asian, 1 unknown. In the MMR deficient patients, event-free probability was 11.9 months. Grade 3 or 4 treatment related adverse events occurred in 50% patients. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this trial represents the first use of a non-chemotherapy-based triplet therapy for recurrent endometrial cancer. The combination of rucaparib, bevacizumab, and atezolizumab may safely be used to treat recurrent/persistent endometrial cancer. This combination demonstrates clinically meaningful improvement in response, with acceptable toxicity. Enhanced response to therapy was seen in MMR deficient subjects. Clinical trial information: NCT03694262.
Safety and efficacy of MORAb-202 in patients (pts) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC): Results from the expansion part of a phase 1 trial.
Authors: Nishio Shin , Yunokawa Mayu , Matsumoto Koji , Takehara Kazuhiro , Hasegawa Kosei , Hirashima Yasuyuki , Kato Hidenori , Ikezawa Hiroki , Nomoto Maiko , Hayato Seiichi , Otake Yohei , Miura Takuma , Yonemori Kan 
Published: June 2022

5513 Background: MORAb-202 is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of farletuzumab (an antibody that binds to folate receptor alpha [FRα]) paired with eribulin mesylate (a microtubule dynamics inhibitor) conjugated via a cathepsin-B–cleavable linker. The dose-escalation part of this phase 1 study confirmed antitumor activity in pts with ovarian cancer (Shimizu 2021, CCR); based on efficacy and safety, MORAb-202 0.9 mg/kg and 1.2 mg/kg Q3W were chosen as doses for the expansion part of this study in pts with PROC. Methods: The primary objective for the expansion part of this phase 1 study conducted in Japan was to define the safety and tolerability of MORAb-202. Secondary objectives included PK characterization and efficacy assessment (best overall response, objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival). Eligible pts included those who had received ≤2 regimens of chemotherapy after diagnosis of PROC, had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and an ECOG PS of ≤1. Pts (except those with high grade serous histology) in the expansion phase were required to be FRα positive. The expansion phase began at the 0.9 mg/kg dose (Cohort 1); Cohort 2 (1.2 mg/kg) was initiated after safety assessment of Cohort 1 was completed. Tumor responses were assessed per RECIST v1.1 by investigator. Results: Twenty-four pts were treated in Cohort 1 and 21 pts were treated in Cohort 2. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 33.3% of pts in Cohort 1 and 28.6% of pts in Cohort 2. The most common TEAE was interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis at both dose levels (Cohort 1: 37.5% [n=9; 8 with grade 1, 1 with grade 2]; Cohort 2: 66.7% [n=14; 6 with grade 1, 7 with grade 2, 1 with grade 3]). Other common TEAEs of any grade were nausea (25.0%; 33.3%), pyrexia (33.3%; 42.9%), malaise (16.7%; 28.6%), and headache (12.5%; 47.6%), in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. ORR was 25.0% and 52.4% in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively (Table). Antitumor activity was observed across FRα-expression levels (<50% and ≥50%) and will be presented. Conclusions: In the PROC population, antitumor activity was seen with both the MORAb-202 0.9 mg/kg and 1.2 mg/kg doses. While pt numbers were small, efficacy was observed irrespective of FRα-expression levels. ILD/pneumonitis was the most common TEAE and was low grade in most pts. Dose optimization is ongoing to maximize the benefit/risk profile of MORAb-202. Clinical trial information: NCT03386942. [Table: see text]
Efficacy and safety of QL1706, a novel dual immune checkpoint blockade containing a mixture of anti-PD1 IgG4 and anti-CTLA4 IgG1 antibodies, for advanced cervical cancer: Cohort data from a phase 1b trial.
Authors: Liu Jihong , Liu Naifu , Wang Danbo , Li Dapeng , Fang Cheng 
Published: June 2022

5535 Background: Anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies have synergistic effect. QL1706 is a novel dual immune checkpoint blockade containing a mixture of anti-PD-1 IgG4 and anti-CTLA4 IgG1 antibodies produced by a single cell line. QL1706 showed promising anti-tumor activity in multiple solid tumors. Here we reported the cervical cancer cohort data from the phase 1b trial of QL1706 (NCT05171790). Methods: Eligible patients had a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix, with recurrent or metastatic, immunotherapy-naive disease at the time of enrollment. Patients were required to have ≥one lesion measurable by RECIST v1.1 and disease that had relapsed after a first-line, platinum-based regimen. Patients were included regardless of PD-L1 expression status at baseline. Patients received intravenous QL1706 5.0 mg/kg q3w (i.e., recommended phase 2 dose, defined in a phase 1a trial), for up to 24 months. The primary endpoint was confirmed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by investigator. The secondary endpoints included disease control rate, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, etc. Results: As of Dec 31, 2021, totally 53 patients with cervical cancer were enrolled (median age, 52 years [range 33-72]). Median follow-up was 5.6 months. Most patients (45 [85%]) had ECOG performance status of 1. Histological breakdown was squamous cell carcinoma (44 [83%]) and adenocarcinoma (nine [17%]). 33 (62%) patients had received one prior chemotherapy, 20(38%) patients had received ≥two prior chemotherapy. The confirmed ORR was 28% (95% CI 17%-42%; 15 patients), including one (2%) complete response and 14 (26%) partial response, with median duration of response not reached (95% CI 2.8 months-not estimable). Disease control was observed in 29 (55%; 95% CI 40%-68%) patients. Median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 1.7-6.9), and 6-month PFS rate was estimated as 37% (95% CI 24%-51%). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were observed in 40 (75%) patients. Nine (17%) experienced grade ≥3 TRAE. The most common TRAE were rash (eight [15%]), hyperthyroidism (eight [15%]), and pyrexia (seven [13%]). Three (6%) patients suffered TRAE leading to dose discontinuation. The immune-related TRAE and serious TRAE were observed in 28 (53%) and eight (15%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: QL1706 demonstrated promising and durable clinical activity, with favorable tolerability in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer. Further investigations in this setting are continuing. Clinical trial information: NCT05171790.
Risk of contralateral breast and other cancers in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer.
Authors: Choong Grace Mei Yee , Savitz Samuel T. , Giridhar Karthik , Haddad Tufia C. , Ruddy Kathryn Jean , Boughey Judy Caroline , Goetz Matthew P. , Couch Fergus , Yadav Siddhartha 
Published: June 2022

555 Background: Women with early-stage breast cancer (BCa) are living longer, and survivorship issues including second primary cancers (SPCs) are therefore increasingly important. This study seeks to determine the risk of SPCs, including contralateral breast cancer (CBCa), in women with early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Methods: The study population consisted of women with BCa diagnosis between 2000-2018 within the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER v 3.2.9) registry and between 2000-2021 in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry. In the SEER registry, the standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for SPCs were estimated for adult women with histologically confirmed early stage (I-III) ILC compared to the development of any primary cancer in the general population. For reference, SIRs for SPCs for a similar patient population with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast were also estimated. For comparison of CBCa between ILC and IDC, follow up records from the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry were evaluated among adult women who underwent lumpectomy or unilateral mastectomy for early stage ILC or IDC. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to compare the risk of CBCa between ILC and IDC while adjusting for the age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity and estrogen receptor status of the primary tumor. Results: An increased incidence (p<0.05) of any SPCs and second BCa was noted for both ILC and IDC compared to the expected rate of primary cancer in the general population (Table). Interestingly, women with ILC were observed to have a significantly increased incidence of subsequent gastric cancer which was not seen for women with IDC. An SIR >1.5 was noted for subsequent risk of sarcoma, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for both ILC and IDC (Table). In the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry of 2,218 women with ILC and 14,629 women with IDC meeting the inclusion criteria, the 5-year risk of CBCa was 2.6% and 1.5% (log rank statistic p-value =0.001) for ILC and IDC respectively. A significantly increased risk of CBCa was noted in women with ILC (Hazard Ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.34-2.47, p<0.001) compared to women with IDC in the multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Women with ILC may have an increased risk of SPC and second BCa compared to the risk of any primary cancer in the general population. The increased incidence of gastric cancer and the higher risk of CBCa in ILC survivors compared to women with IDC is intriguing and needs to be investigated further including evaluation of the role of germline genetic factors. [Table: see text]
Efficacy of maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer according to BRCA mutation genotype in the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial.
Authors: Labidi-Galy Sana Intidhar , Rodrigues Manuel , Sandoval Jose L. , Kurtz Jean Emmanuel , Heitz Florian , Mosconi Anna Maria , Romero Ignacio , Berger Regina , Nagao Shoji , Vergote Ignace , Parma Gabriella , Nøttrup Trine Jakobi , Rouleau Etienne , Garnier Georges , El-Balat Ahmed , Zamagni Claudio , Martín-Lorente Cristina , Pujade-Lauraine Eric , Fiévet Alice , Ray-Coquard Isabelle Laure 
Published: June 2022

5571 Background: In the Phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial, the addition of maintenance olaparib (ola) to bevacizumab (bev) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) resulted in prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), particularly for pts with HRD-positive tumors including a BRCA1/ BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm; Ray-Coquard et al. NEJM 2019). Preclinical data suggest that pts with mutations (mut) in the RING domain of BRCA1 are less sensitive to ola. The magnitude of benefit from ola + bev, according to the location of mut in the functional domains (FD) of BRCA , remains to be explored. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed advanced HGOC in response after platinum-based chemotherapy + bev received maintenance bev (15 mg/kg q3w for 15 months [mo]) + either ola (300 mg bid for 24 mo) or placebo (pbo). In this post hoc exploratory analysis, PFS was analyzed in pts with BRCAm according to mut location in the FDs of BRCA1 (RING, DNA-binding domain [DNA-BD], or BRCA1 C terminus [BRCT]) and BRCA2 (RAD51-BD; DNA-BD). Results: Among the 806 randomized pts, 235 (29.2%) harbored a BRCAm: 160 (19.9%) with a BRCA1 mut and 76 (9.4%) with a BRCA2 mut. BRCA1 mut in FDs of RING, DNA-BD and BRCT were detected in 19 (11.8%), 41 (25.6%) and 34 (21.2%) pts, respectively. BRCA2 mut were detected in FDs of RAD51-BD and DNA-BD in 37 (48.7%) and 14 (18.4%) pts, respectively. With a median follow-up of 25.5 mo, 24-mo PFS rates and hazard ratios (HRs) according to mut locations are reported in the Table. In pts with a BRCA1 DNA-BD mut, 24-mo PFS was 89% and 14% (ola + bev vs pbo + bev; HR 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02–0.26) compared with 64% and 24% for pts with mut in RING + BRCT + other domains (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19–0.57). In pts with BRCA2 mut, 24-mo PFS for pts with mut in the DNA-BD was 91% vs 100% (ola + bev vs pbo + bev) compared with 82% and 44% for pts with mut in RAD51-BD + other domains (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08–0.54). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, pts with newly diagnosed advanced HGOC and a BRCAm had a PFS benefit from maintenance ola + bev regardless of mut locations in BRCA1/BRCA2. Sensitivity to ola + bev maintenance was particularly high for pts with mut in the DNA-BD of BRCA1. Pts with a mut in the DNA-BD of BRCA2 commonly had excellent outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT02477644. [Table: see text]
Camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer after failure of at least first-line therapy: Interim results of a single-arm phase II trial.
Authors: Wang Huaying , Tian Wenjuan , Ren Yulan , Jing Chuyu , Shan Boer 
Published: June 2022

5591 Background: For advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC), therapeutic options remain scarce. Immune or antiangiogenic monotherapy has shown moderate efficacy in EC. Preclinical and clinical data showed that camrelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) plus apatinib (a selective VEGFR2 inhibitor) markedly enhanced anti-tumor efficacy in multiple solid tumors. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of camrelizumab and apatinib as second-line or above therapy for advanced or recurrent EC. Methods: This was an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial conducted in China. Patients with advanced or recurrent EC who progressed after at least first-line therapy received camrelizumab (200 mg, intravenously, q2w) plus apatinib (250 mg, orally, qd). Using a minimax Simon two-stage design, 21 patients were enrolled at stage I and if a complete or partial response was observed in at least four patients, the enrollment would be continued to 40 patients. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included time to objective response (TTR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of Response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF) and safety. Here, the results of stage I are reported. Results: Between January 20, 2020 and July 8, 2021, 21 patients were enrolled. The median age was 57 years (range 29–72). Thirteen patients (61.9%) had ECOG PS of 0, and eight patients (38.1%) received at least two prior therapies. As of November 9, 2021, the median follow-up time was 13.5 months (IQR 11.3-16.3). Among 21 evaluable patients, the confirmed ORR was 47.6% (95% CI 25.7%-70.2%) with complete response in one patient (4.8%) and partial response in nine patients (42.9%); eight patients had stable disease for a DCR of 85.7% (95% CI 63.7%-97.0%). The median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI 5.2-14.4). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade and of grade ≥ 3 were reported in 21 (100%) patients and 10 (47.6%) patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 TRAEs included gamma-glutamyltransferase increased (six [28.6%]), direct bilirubin increased (four [19.0%]), alanine aminotransferase increased (three [14.3%]), aspartate aminotransferase increased (three [14.3%]) and hyperglycaemia (three [14.3%]). Four patients (19.0%) experienced reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation, all of which were grade 1-2. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: Camrelizumab plus apatinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced or recurrent EC after failure of at least first-line therapy. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000031932.
Biomarkers for response to immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: Differences between survival and pCR biomarkers.
Authors: Denkert Carsten , Schneeweiss Andreas , Rey Julia , Karn Thomas , Braun Michael , Huober Jens Bodo , Sinn Hans-Peter , Zahm Dirk Michael , Hanusch Claus , Marmé Frederik , Furlanetto Jenny , Thomalla Joerg , Blohmer Jens U. , van Mackelenbergh Marion , Staib Peter , Jackisch Christian , Fasching Peter A. , Sinn Bruno Valentin , Untch Michael , Loibl Sibylle 
Published: June 2022

583 Background: Immunotherapy is entering clinical practice as a promising new neoadjuvant therapeutic approach in triple-negative breast cancer, and it is important to identify biomarkers to focus this therapy on those patients that have the highest benefit. Interestingly, an improved survival outcome is observed in pCR and non-pCR patients, which raises the hypothesis that biomarkers might also be different for pCR prediction as well as prognosis. In this study, we investigated this hypothesis in the neoadjuvant GeparNuevo trial. Methods: A total of 174 patients were randomized to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with durvalumab vs. placebo. HTG EdgeSeq mRNA analysis was performed for a total of 2549 genes in 162 pretherapeutic core biopsies. In addition, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (stromal and intratumoural) as well as PD-L1 protein expression was evaluated by IHC. We systematically compared the distant disease-free survival (DDFS) of 5 predefined gene signatures (including the GeparSixto immune signature) as well as 12 single mRNA markers identified in previous projects between treatment arms using univariate Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses. In addition, exploratory biomarker analyses were performed. Results: The PSIP1 gene expression (per 1 unit hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58 95%CI 0.41-0.83; p=0.002), TAP1 (per 1 unit HR: 0.68 95%CI 0.48-0.95; p=0.025) as well as stromal TILs (sTILs) (per 10% HR: 0.73 95%CI 0.56-0.95; p=0.019) were significant for improved DDFS in the complete cohort. In the placebo arm PSIP1 (HR 0.50 95%CI 0.29-0.87; p=0.014) as well as sTILs (HR 0.73 95%CI 0.53-0.99; p=0.044) were significant for improved DDFS. In the durvalumab arm, the gene expression of PSIP1 (HR 0.54 95%CI 0.31-0.94; p=0.029), PD-L1/CD274 (per 1 unit HR: 0.41 95%CI 0.21-0.77; p=0.006), CD38 (per 1 unit: HR 0.52 95%CI 0.29-0.92; p=0.026) as well as the GeparSixto immune signature (per 1 unit HR: 0.51 95%CI 0.27-0.97; p=0.041) were significant for improved DDFS, with a positive test for interaction with treatment arm for PD-L1/CD274 (interaction p=0.020). Additional analyses, including multivariate Cox regressions for DDFS as well as systematic comparisons for biomarkers for DDFS and for pCR, will be presented. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that biomarkers for immune response are linked to improved survival with neoadjuvant durvalumab therapy and that in this setting, survival biomarkers are not identical to pCR biomarkers. The results are a basis for a further dissection of the contribution of pCR to survival effects of immunotherapy.
Improved pathologic complete response rates for triple-negative breast cancer in the I-SPY2 Trial.
Authors: Yee Douglas , Shatsky Rebecca Arielle , Yau Christina , Wolf Denise M. , Nanda Rita , van 't Veer Laura , Berry Donald A. , DeMichele Angela , Esserman Laura ,   I-SPY2 Consortium
Published: June 2022

591 Background: The I-SPY2 Trial evaluates multiple investigative agents in neoadjuvant breast cancer therapy with the primary endpoint of estimated pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. As a platform phase 2 trial it utilizes an adaptive design to compare new regimens with control chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel followed by AC). Methods: Specific regimens are assigned based on clinically relevant signatures, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Drug regimens graduate from the trial when the predicted pCR rate in any signature meets the pre-specified threshold of 85% probability of success in a hypothetical 300-patient, 1:1 randomized, phase 3 trial. The strong correlation between pCR rate and event free survival has been reported. To establish the benefit of administering investigational agents in combination with control weekly paclitaxel x 12 in TNBC, we report estimated pCR rates for the first 7 investigational agents. Results: TNBC accounted for 37% (363/987) of enrolled patients. Only veliparib and carboplatin (VC) and pembrolizumab (Pembro) met the graduation criteria for TNBC. However, compared to control chemotherapy, each drug tested in TNBC resulted in a numerically superior pCR rate compared to control. These findings imply that stratification of TNBC by response-predictive biomarkers may lead to improved pCR rates. For example, we have used gene expression profiling to further refine TNBC classification into Immune enhanced (Immune+), Immune-/DNA Repair Deficient (DRD)+, and Immune-/DRD- classes. TNBC identified as immune enhanced (63%) have an 89% pCR rate to pembrolizumab, while VC is less effective with pCR rate of 71%. Similarly, Immune-/DRD+ (11%) identifies TNBCs with a 80% pCR rate to VC, while pembrolizumab’s pCR rate in this group is only 33%. For tumors that are neither immune enhanced or DRD-positive (Immune-/DRD-; 25%) show numerically improved pCR rates for neratinib (20%), MK2206 (25%), ganitumab (24%), and ganetespib (22%) compared to control (12%). pCR rates for VC (10%) and pembrolizumab (20%) in this group were similar to drugs that did not graduate. For TNBC, many agents in I-SPY2 showed numerically improved pCR rates compared to conventional chemotherapy even when they did not meet our specified definition of graduation. Conclusions: Further refinement of TNBC signatures should yield improved therapeutic strategies while also sparing women unnecessary systemic therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379. [Table: see text]