bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
AdvanTIG-206: Anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody (mAb) ociperlimab (BGB-A1217; OCI) plus anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) mAb tislelizumab (TIS) plus BAT1706 versus TIS plus BAT1706 as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Authors: Fan Jia , Ren Zhenggang , Hsu Chiun , Guo Yabing , Song Tianqiang , Wang Wentao , Chao Yee , Gao Yujuan , Li Vincent , Ferro Salvatore , Yen Chia-Jui 
Published: June 2022

TPS4172 Background: Treatment with PD-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents has demonstrated significant survival improvements in patients with untreated HCC. T cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain (TIGIT) is a co-inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor upregulated on T cells and natural killer cells in multiple solid tumors. OCI is a novel, humanized mAb that binds TIGIT with high specificity and affinity, blocking interaction with its ligands on tumor cells. TIS is an anti-PD-1 mAb that has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with previously treated, unresectable HCC (NCT03419897). BAT1706 is a similar biological product to the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab. OCI combined with TIS and BAT1706 could further enhance both anti-angiogenic and anti-PD-1 therapies for patients with HCC. Methods: AdvanTIG-206 is a Phase 2, randomized, open-label clinical study (NCT04948697). Patients aged ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed advanced HCC that is not amenable to a curative treatment approach are eligible. Patients must have a Child-Pugh A score, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and have received no prior systemic therapy for HCC. Approximately 90 patients will be randomized 2:1 to OCI 900 mg combined with TIS 200 mg plus BAT1706 15 mg/kg (Arm A) or TIS 200 mg plus BAT1706 15 mg/kg (Arm B), all administered intravenously (once every 3 weeks [Q3W]). The primary endpoint is objective response rate as assessed by the investigator (RECIST v1.1). Radiological assessment of tumor response status will be performed Q6W for the first 48 weeks and Q12W thereafter. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, time to response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and progression-free survival (all by investigator’s assessment), overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Study enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04948697.
ALTER-UC-001: Phase II trial of anlotinib plus everolimus as first-line treatment for advanced non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Authors: Zhang Hailiang , Ye Ding-Wei 
Published: June 2022

TPS4598 Background: For patients (pts) with recurrent or stage IV non-clear cell renal cancer (nccRCC), the medical treatment guidelines recommend the first choice to participate in clinical trials, or use TKI drugs such as sunitinib, and mTOR inhibitors such as everolimus. Anlotinib is a novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It’s antitumor targets include vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and c-kit. This a single-center, single-arm, phase II trial which will evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of anlotinib hydrochloride plus everolimus as first-line therapy in pts with nccRCC (NCT05124431). Methods: Key inclusion criteria are: age ≥18 years; histologically confirmed advanced nccRCC, advanced disease is defined as TNM stage IV, not available for surgery, locally recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma; no prior systemic drug therapy for advanced disease; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1. Approximately 30 pts will be assigned to receive anlotinib hydrochloride: 12 mg every 21 days (14 days on treatment from Day 1-14, 7 days off treatment from Day 15-21) by oral, and everolimus 5mg qd, continued for up to 1 year (∼17 cycles ) or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Radiographic imaging will be performed every 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints included overall disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), and over survival (OS). Adverse events will be monitored throughout the study and graded according to CTCAE V5.0. Recruitment have begun in Jan. 2022. Research Sponsor: Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. Clinical trial information: NCT05124431.
A phase 1b/2 study of batiraxcept (AVB-S6-500) in combination with cabozantinib, cabozantinib and nivolumab, and as monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (NCT04300140).
Authors: Beckermann Katy , Shah Neil J. , Vogelzang Nicholas J. , Mao Shifeng S. , Ornstein Moshe Chaim , Hammers Hans J. , Gao Xin , McDermott David F. , Haas Naomi B. , Yan Hongxia , Esquibel Vanessa , Rangwala Reshma A. , Campbell Matthew T 
Published: June 2022

TPS4599 Background: In clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) the constitutive expression of hypoxia induced factor 1-α leads to increased expression of AXL. AXL overexpression has been associated with the development of resistance to VEGF inhibitors and suppression of the innate immune response through inhibition of macrophage-driven inflammation. Batiraxcept is a recombinant fusion protein dimer containing an extracellular region of human AXL combined with the human immunoglobulin G1 heavy chain (Fc), which demonstrates highly potent, specific AXL inhibition. In preclinical studies using the 786-O, M62, and SN12L1 tumors, batiraxcept monotherapy resulted in a significant reduction of tumor growth compared to control. In healthy volunteer and ovarian cancer clinical studies, batiraxcept was well tolerated with no dose-related adverse events, and a maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Therefore, batiraxcept could be tested as either a monotherapy or in combination with standard of care drugs in patients with metastatic ccRCC. The Phase 1b dose-escalation portion of this study evaluated batiraxcept in combination with standard of care cabozantanib in patients who progressed on or after first line therapy. No DLT was observed at either of two batiraxcept doses evaluated. The recommended Phase 2 dose of batiraxcept has been identified as 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks (q2w) with cabozantinib 60 mg based upon safety, PK/PD, and preliminary efficacy data. Methods: This Phase 2, multi-center, open-label study includes three parts: Part A) batiraxcept 15 mg/kg q2w in combination with cabozantinib 60 mg daily for ccRCC subjects who have progressed on or after one line of therapy, n=25. Part B) batiraxcept 15 mg/kg q2w with cabozantinib 40 mg daily and nivolumab at the investigator’s choice (240 mg q2w or 480 mg q4w) for first line treatment of advanced or metastatic ccRCC subjects, n=20. If no safety signals are observed in the first 6 subjects enrolled, 10 subjects will be enrolled in the first stage of a Simon 2-stage minmax statistical design. If ≥ 6/10 subjects achieve PR or CR, stage 2 will open to enroll up to 20 total subjects. Part C) batiraxcept 15 mg/kg q2w monotherapy for subjects with advanced/metastatic ccRCC ineligible for curative intent therapies, n=10. The primary objective for each arm is objective response rate by RECIST v1.1. Secondary objectives include safety, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, progression free survival by RECIST v1.1, and overall survival. Exploratory objectives include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments. The Phase 2 portion of this Ph1b/2 study is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT04300140.
A phase II clinical trial of neoadjuvant sasanlimab and stereotactic body radiation therapy as an in situ vaccine for cisplatin-ineligible muscle invasive bladder cancer (RAD VACCINE MIBC).
Authors: Satkunasivam Raj , Lim Kelvin , Teh Bin S. , Esnaola Nestor F. , Slawin Jeremy , Zhang Jun , Miles Brian , Brooks Michael Austin , Anis Maryam , Muhammad Taliah , Farach Andrew M. , Chen Shu-Hsia , Efstathiou Eleni , Sonpavde Guru P. 
Published: June 2022

TPS4611 Background: The utilization of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, including anti-PD1/L1 agents, prior to radical cystectomy (RC), is an emerging paradigm in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Pathologic complete responses (pCR) have been observed in 25-40% of patients with neoadjuvant PD1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy for cisplatin-ineligible MIBC. In situ vaccination using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may augment T-cell responses to tumor-specific antigens through immunogenic cell death. Sasanlimab (PF-06801591) is a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody that targets PD-1 selectively, for which there are both Phase 1 data and ongoing Phase 3 trials in early-stage urothelial carcinoma. There exists a strong rationale to evaluate a novel strategy of combination neoadjuvant ICI therapy with SBRT as an in situ vaccine to improve loco-regional control and decrease the risk of distant recurrence in cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC. Methods: This is a prospective, investigator-initiated, single-arm, single-institution, phase II trial that evaluates neoadjuvant sasanlimab in combination with SBRT as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with MIBC before RC. Eligibility requires patients to be cisplatin-ineligible (one of the following: ECOG-PS=2, creatinine clearance <60 ml/min, or comorbidities such as hearing loss or neuropathy) or those who refuse cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Sasanlimab (300 mg) will be administered subcutaneously on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for a total of 2 cycles, in combination with SBRT to the primary tumor at a dose of 24Gy given in 3 fractions, starting on Day 1 of Cycle 2 with a 48-hour interval between fractions. The combination treatment will be assessed by using a Simon’s 2-Stage design, which the first 10 patients are enrolled as a safety lead-in to evaluate the safety and feasibility. Futility analysis will be performed after a total of 18 patients. The primary endpoint is pCR rate after neoadjuvant sasanlimab/SBRT, followed by RC. If pCR is observed in 4 or fewer patients, further enrollment of patients may be stopped with the conclusion that pT0 cannot be 40% or greater. Otherwise, an additional 15 patients will be accrued in stage II, resulting in a total of 33 patients. Secondary endpoints include adverse events, surgical complication rates, health related quality-of-life, overall survival, and recurrence free survival. Exploratory endpoints include analysis of and association with pCR of the tumor/germline genetic signatures, circulating tumor DNA, tumor PD-L1 expression, blood cytometry time-of-flight analysis to identify immune response. Enrollment opened on February 15, 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05241340.
A phase II trial evaluating combination pemetrexed and avelumab in patients with MTAP-deficient advanced urothelial cancer.
Authors: Shah Amishi Yogesh , Campbell Matthew T , Tidwell Rebecca , Siefker-Radtke Arlene O. , Goswami Sangeeta , Alhalabi Omar , Adriazola Ana Cecilia , Shaw Leah , Ye Yin , Chen Jianfeng , Yan Xinmiao , Wang Linghua , Gao Jianjun 
Published: June 2022

TPS4612 Background: MTAP-deficiency occurs primarily due to homozygous loss in chromosome 9p21 and is seen in approximately 25% of urothelial cancers. MTAP-deficiency portends aggressive biology with poorer outcomes than in MTAP-proficient tumors; for example, in the IMvigor210 data, MTAP-deficient patients had median overall survival of 8.0 months, compared to 11.3 months in MTAP-proficient patients (p = 0.042). MTAP-deficient tumors lack salvage nucleotide synthesis pathways and thus are uniquely sensitive to anti-folate agents; however, in prior clinical work with pemetrexed in these tumors, responses are relatively short-lived. In-vivo data has suggested that pemetrexed can increase tumor infiltrating T-cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and PD-L1 expression in MTAP-deficient tumors and decrease myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). As such, it was postulated that sequential treatment with anti-folate chemotherapy (pemetrexed) and immune checkpoint inhibition (avelumab) would improve responses in MTAP-deficient urothelial cancer. Methods: A prospective phase II trial of patients with advanced MTAP-deficient urothelial cancer is being conducted under IRB-approved protocol NCT03744793. This study will enroll 25 patients at a single site (The University of TX, MD Anderson Cancer Center). Key eligibility criteria include patients with advanced MTAP-deficient urothelial cancer with measurable disease in second-line or beyond. MTAP-deficiency is confirmed with CLIA-approved IHC or NGS. Patients are stratified as being IO-pretreated versus IO-naïve. All patients receive a lead-in cycle of pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) followed by combination pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and avelumab (10 mg/kg) IV every three weeks until disease progression, patient withdrawal, or unacceptable toxicity. Three biopsies per patient with tissue collection at trial baseline, on single agent pemetrexed, and on combination pemetrexed-avelumab are performed. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate response rate with sequential pemetrexed and avelumab in MTAP-deficient urothelial cancer. Imaging response assessment is done via RECIST v1.1. Secondary objectives are to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as to perform correlative studies evaluating the effect of this therapy on immune cells and tumor microenvironment. This correlative work includes but is not limited to evaluation of peripheral T-cells, tumor-infiltrating T-cells, macrophages, and MDSCs. Interim analyses for futility and safety occur in cohorts of 5 patients and are performed based on Bayesian sequential methods. Fifteen patients have been enrolled thus far. Clinical trial information: NCT03744793.
Subcutaneous nivolumab versus intravenous nivolumab in patients with previously treated, advanced, or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Authors: Chacon Matias Rodrigo , Cutuli Hernan J. , Bracarda Sergio , Maruzzo Marco , Bourlon Maria Teresa , Jacobs Carmel , Pérez-Valderrama Begoña , Magri Ignacio , Richardet Martin , Centkowski Piotr , Fu Simon Yuen Fai , Gurman Pablo , Konduri Srivani , Yu Zhuoxin , Vezina Heather , George Saby , Albiges Laurence 
Published: June 2022

TPS4621 Background: Nivolumab (NIVO), a programmed death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy across patients with different tumor types, including clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), when administered via IV infusion. As an alternative to IV infusion, subcutaneous (SC) administration alleviates the need for IV ports, thereby lowering the risk of associated complications such as infections and phlebitis. SC formulation also reduces the time for dose preparation and administration, which may decrease overall treatment burden and reduce patient time in the clinic, benefiting patients and healthcare providers and improving overall healthcare resource utilization. SC-administered NIVO consists of NIVO co-formulated with the recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 enzyme (NIVO + rHuPH20), which aims to increase the dispersion and absorption of NIVO within the SC space. SC NIVO + rHuPH20 was shown to be safe and well tolerated in a phase 1/2 study, warranting further investigation (Lonardi S et al. J Clin Oncol 2021;39(suppl 15):2575). Methods: CheckMate 67T is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study that will evaluate the noninferiority of SC NIVO + rHuPH20 versus IV NIVO in patients with advanced or metastatic ccRCC who have progressed after receiving ≤ 2 prior systemic treatment regimens. Key inclusion criteria are age ≥ 18 years, histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic ccRCC, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1 within 28 days prior to randomization, and a Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70. Key exclusion criteria are untreated symptomatic metastases to the central nervous system, other malignancy, autoimmune diseases, HIV-positive status with AIDS-defining infection within past year or current CD4 count < 350 cells/μL, other serious or uncontrolled disorders including severe, acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, and prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, other T-cell–targeting antibody drugs, or live attenuated vaccines within 30 days of first study treatment. At least 454 eligible patients will be randomized to receive SC NIVO + rHuPH20 or IV NIVO. The primary objectives are to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) noninferiority of SC NIVO versus IV NIVO, as measured by time-averaged serum concentration over the first 28 days (Cavgd28) and trough serum concentration at steady state (Cminss) (co-primary endpoints). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate by blinded independent central review, additional PK parameters, safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of SC NIVO and IV NIVO. This study is currently enrolling patients globally. Clinical trial information: NCT04810078.
Phase 3 VERACITY clinical study of sabizabulin in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have progressed on an androgen receptor targeting agent.
Authors: Dreicer Robert , Chu Franklin , Cahn David J , Getzenberg Robert H. , Rodriguez Domingo , Barnette K. Gary , Steiner Mitchell S. , Saltzstein Daniel R. , Tutrone Ronald F. , Shore Neal D. 
Published: June 2022

TPS5102 Background: Sabizabulin is a first-in-class, oral agent that inhibits microtubule polymerization disrupting the cytoskeleton and arresting cellular proliferation. A Phase 1b/2 clinical study was conducted to establish the MTD and evaluate the preliminary efficacy in men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who progressed on at least one androgen receptor targeting agent (ARTA). The most common AEs reported were mild to moderate diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting with no clinically relevant neurotoxicity or neutropenia. In the Phase 1b/2, the median radiographic progression free survival for the 63mg dose (n = 55) was 11.4 months (range 6-36+ months) in the Phase 1b portion including responses > 2.75 years. The Phase 3 reformulation which had improved bioavailability is 32mg PO qd. Methods: VERACITY is an ongoing Phase 3 multicenter, randomized, active-control study designed to evaluate sabizabulin in the treatment of mCRPC who have progressed on at least one ARTA. Patients on the study will be chemotherapy naive. Subjects (n = 245) are being randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive sabizabulin (32 mg/d oral) or active control (alternative ARTA) and will remain on study until radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). Randomization will be stratified by: measurable disease vs bone-only disease and by prior exposure to ARTA (progressed on one vs more than one prior ARTA). The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is median rPFS. Secondary endpoints include: objective response rate (ORR), duration of objective response, overall survival and time to intravenous (IV) chemotherapy. The Phase 3, VERACITY registration clinical trial is current ongoing in approximately 45 clinical sites with enrollment anticipated to be completed in 2022 and with unblinded results presented in 2023 Based upon the Phase 1b/2 clinical trial, sabizabulin daily chronic oral dosing has a favorable safety profile, is feasible to administer chronically, and has significant and durable antitumor activity. mCRPC that has progressed following ARTAs and prior to taxane chemotherapy, remains an urgent unmet medical need for patients with advanced disease. Sabizabulin is an exciting first-in-class agent that may add to the armamentarium for the treatment of mCRPC following progression on ARTA’s. Clinical trial information: NCT04844749.
A phase III double blinded study of early intervention after radical prostatectomy with androgen deprivation therapy with darolutamide versus placebo in men at highest risk of prostate cancer metastasis by genomic stratification (ERADICATE).
Authors: Morgans Alicia K. , Chen Yu-Hui , Ferrari Anna C. C. , Tran Phuoc T. , Schaeffer Edward M. , Shevrin Daniel H. , Szmulewitz Russell Zelig , Boike Thomas , Dorff Tanya B. , Liu Glenn , Wagner Lynne I. , Carducci Michael Anthony 
Published: June 2022

TPS5114 Background: Patients with high-risk scores by Decipher molecular testing after prostatectomy have a 5-year metastasis rate of 28% (Decipher 0.6-0.7) and 38% (Decipher > 0.7), likely due to micrometastatic disease. Clinical trials with intensified systemic treatment are warranted to increase cure rates and address this unmet need. Previous studies of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in clinically identified high-risk disease have not demonstrated substantial benefit other than in men with lymph node positive disease. Darolutamide is a novel androgen receptor antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in improving metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and OS in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Whether treatment with ADT and darolutamide can increase MFS versus ADT plus placebo in the adjuvant setting for men with molecularly identified high-risk prostate cancer is unknown. Methods: Patients with CAPRA-S scores ≥3 and a PSA < 0.2 after radical prostatectomy undergo Decipher testing provided by the trial. Eligible patients with high-risk Decipher scores (> 0.6) will be randomized to treatment with ADT with darolutamide or placebo for 12 months. Patients are stratified by intent to deliver adjuvant radiation and by baseline PSA (undetectable vs detectable but < 0.2 ng/mL). The primary endpoint is MFS defined by novel PET or conventional imaging. With a sample size of 810 patients, the trial has 80% power with one-sided alpha = 0.025 to detect a HR of 0.60 for the experimental arm vs control arm for the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include recurrence-free survival, event-free survival, and quality of life (FACT-P, FACT-Cog, and FACIT-Fatigue), overall survival, and other disease-related outcomes. Trial was activated on December 9, 2020, and is currently enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04484818.
A randomized trial on pelvic lymph node dissection versus no lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Report of a trial in progress.
Authors: Benfante Nicole , Carroll Erin , Carruthers Jessica , Donahue Timothy F. , Eastham James Andrew , Ehdaie Behfar , Goh Alvin C. , Laudone Vincent Paul , Pietzak Eugene J. , Smith Robert , Vickers Andrew , Sjoberg Daniel D. , Scardino Peter T. , Touijer Karim A. 
Published: June 2022

TPS5116 Background: The therapeutic benefit of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in the surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer remains unproven. In this trial we aim to evaluate whether PLND reduces biochemical recurrence rates in clinically localized prostate cancer patients. We are presenting our experience in accrual during our first year of implementing this trial at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Methods: Patients without evidence of positive or suspicious pelvic lymph nodes on pre-operative imaging, and without prior pelvic radiation for prostate cancer are eligible. Following informed consent prior to radical prostatectomy, patients are enrolled onto the trial and surgeons are randomized using a cluster randomization. Surgeons are randomized to perform a PLND vs. no PLND for a 3-month period. Since our trial began accruing in July 2020, we have enrolled 366 patients (51 high risk, 286 intermediate risk, and 29 low risk) out of 996 eligible patients (37%) through January 2022. We have enrolled 168 patients in the PLND arm and 198 patients in the no PLND arm. Table 1 shows the breakdown of patient consent status in each risk group, by randomization assignment. At this stage in the accrual, we do not see evidence of consenting bias among PLND vs. no PLND randomization and risk group. We conclude that a single-center cluster randomized trial can accrue large numbers of patients in a short period of time, allowing for large scale trials to be completed. Currently, our trial is on track to complete accrual within our 5-year goal. Clinical trial information: NCT01407263. [Table: see text]