The barriers and facilitators to research in practice: the experiences of a medicines optimisation team within a clinical commissioning group
Authors: Tomlinson J , Turner E , Beba H , Smith H 
Published: November 2022

Abstract

Introduction
Research active healthcare organisations and staff have been shown to significantly improve performance and patient outcomes1. Undertaking research is a core element of the pharmacist role, however many pharmacists report not having the skills, knowledge and/or resources to take part2. There are many opportunities for the delivery of transformational research within primary care, however pharmacy team engagement is lacking.

Aim
To explore the barriers and facilitators to research engagement within a Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Medicines Optimisation team.

Methods
Twelve focus groups, guided by a semi-structured topic guide, were held over MS Teams between October 2021 and February 2022. 37 participants (pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and administrative support roles) attended and discussed topics relating to their experiences of engaging with research, as well as what helped or hindered them. Detailed notes were taken and analysed using Thematic Analysis. Following this inductive analysis, which aimed to capture all themes arising from the data, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)3 was applied. This helped to categorise the barriers and facilitators into domains which influence to what extent research is undertaken. The analysis was validated by the CCG team. This study was deemed to be service evaluation and therefore no ethical approval was needed.

Results
Three core themes emerged: People, Place and Practicalities. Individuals felt they had limited knowledge and capabilities in the field of research, despite having an internal motivation to engage in research activity. The perception of research was often linked in peoples’ thoughts to academia or secondary care/ acute Trusts or lab-based, and therefore not really something they would engage with in their current role. A lack of research culture, leadership and visibility of projects were all thought to hinder the team. A clear need for training and education in research (what it is, how it can be done, and available tools) was expressed, as well as appropriate resource allocation. Mapping to the CFIR illustrated that most barriers fell within the inner setting (i.e. the organisation itself) and with the process of conducting research, such as limited time, lack of encouragement from champions and poor feedback from projects. Enablers were also identified which included advice offered by external organisations, dissemination about work conducted in other primary care organisations and beliefs about the benefits of being research active.

Discussion/Conclusion
Participants perceived there to be many more barriers to research engagement than enablers, and these ranged from challenges with the individual projects, the process of conducting research within the organisation, things about the person themselves, their organisation or the wider setting of primary care. Areas for improvement were identified, mainly through increased training, visibility of projects and interested people, development of champions and role models, and stronger links with academia. This study was conducted with only one CCG and therefore further work needs to explore the experience within other integrated care boards and across secondary and community practice.

References
1. Hanney, S., Boaz, A., Soper, B. and Jones, T. Engagement in research: an innovative three-stage review of the benefits for health-care performance. Health Services and Delivery Research, 2013;1(8). ISSN (print) 2050-4349
2. Crilly P, Patel N, Ogunrinde A, Berko D, Kayyali R. Community Pharmacists’ Involvement in Research in the United Kingdom. Pharmacy. 2017;5(3):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy5030048
3. Damschroder, L.J., Aron, D.C., Keith, R.E. et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Sci 2009;4:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50