Developing an adaptive management approach to cowbird control on the Santa Clara River, California
Authors: Parker Sophie S. , Hall Linnea S. , Whitfield Mary J. , Riege Laura , Selm Kathryn R. , Corado René 
Published: June 2022

AbstractBrood parasitism by the brown‐headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) has caused population declines for conservation‐reliant songbird species such as the federally and state endangered subspecies least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus). Although cowbird trapping has increased vireo populations, it is costly, and may prevent the development of parasitism‐avoidance behaviors and result in high rates of non‐target species captures. Therefore, wildlife managers have a compelling interest in evaluating multiple means of cowbird control. We conducted a study between 2016 and 2018 on the Santa Clara River (SCR) in Ventura County, California, USA, to test how the removal of cowbird traps would affect cowbird parasitism of the vireo. At our control site, cowbird trapping occurred in spring using modified Australian crow (Corvusspp.) traps. At our treatment site, we stopped this method of trapping and instead used target‐netting of individual cowbirds and a very short duration trap to capture specific individual cowbirds (i.e., contingency trapping). We also tested the impact of shortening the cowbird trapping period on nest parasitism rates, and used point counts to compare cowbird densities between sites. Additionally, we compared the costs of these techniques. A shorter trapping period still resulted in a large number of cowbird captures on the control site (n = 452 captures) with no observed brood parasitism (n = 67 nests). On the treatment site, cowbird parasitism rates varied from 0% to 14% (n = 75 broods). The target‐netting method was not effective for capturing female cowbirds, probably because of their low densities. The short‐term contingency trapping method effectively removed female cowbirds in the vicinity of vulnerable vireo nests. Cowbird traps captured >300 individuals of 9 different non‐target species each year on the control site, whereas target‐netting and contingency trapping resulted in only 8 captures of 4 different non‐target species. Costs of continuous trapping for 2 months versus point counts, nest monitoring, and contingency trapping were $21,100.00 versus $16,996.00, respectively. Based on these findings, we recommend that an adaptive cowbird management program to benefit songbird populations should consider using regular point counts and nest monitoring to provide data on cowbird impacts, in lieu of continued intensive trapping without monitoring. Thresholds for the density of cowbird females and the allowable level of parasitism for host species should also be established to guide an adaptive cowbird management program. Short‐term contingency trapping based on the thresholds should be considered, but restoration of native vegetation, especially in southwestern riparian areas, is also crucial and effective at limiting parasitism, and so should strongly be considered. Lastly, large numbers of non‐target species captures in cowbird traps are probably having consequential impacts to these species, and need to be monitored and minimized.