The 'scan and treat' clinic; early evaluation of an advanced clinical practitioner (ACP) led combined echocardiography and outpatient cardiology clinic
Authors: Spencer C 
Published: July 2023

Abstract

Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.

Background
There is increasing recognition that traditional models of hospital-based outpatient care in England are inefficient, unsustainable and do meet patient’s needs and preferences (RCP 2018). The National Health Service (NHS) ‘getting it right fist time’ (GIRFT) report for cardiology makes a number of recommendations including; increasing the utilisation non-medical roles such as Advanced Clinical Practitioners (ACPs), reducing face to face appointments, and triaging referrals with tests performed ahead of clinic appointments (NHS, 2021). We developed a novel clinic combining formal echocardiography with clinical assessment by a single British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) accredited ACP at medium sized district general hospital (DGH) in the west Midlands, England. No clinics of this type were identified in the literature, although there are studies demonstrating the efficacy of physiologist led valve clinics (Wasing et al., 2009) and cardiologist led ‘one stop’ clinics (Falces et al., 2008)

Purpose
To evaluate the case mix and early outcomes of the first 6 months of the scan and treat clinic.

Methods
Patient demographics, reason for referral and clinic actions were collected prospectively on an excel spreadsheet. A single un-blinded cardiologist reviewed the electronic patient records and echo images of 10 randomly selected patients from the first 3 months to assess the accuracy and appropriateness of documented diagnoses and treatment plans.

Results
72 patients were seen over 11 clinics between July and December 2022. There was a low (6%) non-attendance rate, although a further 5 patients (7%) did not require an echo, due to booking errors. The most common reason for referral was suspected heart failure (33%) (table 1). Combined Heart Failure (HFrEF, HFmrEF, HFpEF) was also the most common primary diagnosis in the clinic (32%) (figure 1). There was a low rate of non-cardiac diagnoses (19%) and normal echocardiograms (33%) (figure 1). Clinic actions included prescribing (54%), cardiac monitors (24%), further imaging (15%) and blood tests (11%). The Cardiologist reviewer reported appropriate diagnosis and treatment of 10 radomly selected cases. Of 7 patients followed up in a cardiologist clinic before 10/01/2023, 5 had no significant changes in treatment or diagnosis, 1 patient had a pacemaker for asymptomatic 2nd degree AV block and another had Bisoprolol stopped due to side effects.

Conclusion
These preliminary results suggest the ‘scan and treat’ clinic is a viable alternative to traditional general cardiology clinic for patients who also require echocardiography. This review has a number of limitations including limited short term follow up, un-blinded cardiologist review and is not generalizable. This kind of initiative may help modernise and improve cardiology outpatient services. Further research is required to assess the efficacy of similar non-cardiologist led ‘one-stop’ clinic designs.Table 1Figure 1