A general framework to support cost-efficient fecal egg count method and study design choices for large-scale STH deworming programs – monitoring of therapeutic drug efficacy as a case study
Authors: Coffeng Luc E , Vlaminck Johnny , Cools Piet , Denwood Matthew , Albonico Marco , Ame Shaali M , Ayana Mio , Dana Daniel , Cringoli Giuseppe , de Vlas Sake J , Fenwick Alan , French Michael , Kazienga Adama , Keiser Jennifer , Knopp Stefanie , Leta Gemechu , Matoso Leonardo F. , Maurelli Maria P. , Montresor Antonio , Mirams Greg , Mekonnen Zeleke , Corrêa-Oliveira Rodrigo , Pinto Simone A. , Rinaldi Laura , Sayasone Somphou , Steinmann Peter , Thomas Eurion , Vercruysse Jozef , Levecke Bruno 
Published: January 2023

AbstractBackgroundSoil-transmitted helminth (STH) control programs currently lack evidence-based recommendations for cost-efficient survey designs for monitoring and evaluation. Here, we present a framework to provide evidence-based recommendations, using a case study of therapeutic drug efficacy monitoring based on the examination of helminth eggs in stool.MethodsWe performed an in-depth analysis of the operational costs to process one stool sample for three diagnostic methods (Kato-Katz, Mini-FLOTAC and FECPAKG2). Next, we performed simulations to determine the probability of detecting a truly reduced therapeutic efficacy for different scenarios of STH species (Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiuraand hookworms), pre-treatment infection levels, survey design (screen and select (SS); screen, select and retest (SSR) and no selection (NS)) and number of subjects enrolled (10 – 2,000). Finally, we integrated the outcome of the cost assessment into the simulation study to estimate the total survey costs and determined the most cost-efficient survey design.Principal FindingsKato-Katz allowed for both the highest sample throughput and the lowest cost per test, while FECPAKG2required both the most laboratory time and was the most expensive. Counting of eggs accounted for 23% (FECPAKG2) or ≥80% (Kato-Katz and Mini-FLOTAC) of the total time-to-result.NSsurvey designs in combination with Kato-Katz were the most cost-efficient to assess therapeutic drug efficacy in all scenarios of STH species and endemicity.Conclusions/significanceWe confirm that Kato-Katz is the fecal egg counting method of choice for monitoring therapeutic drug efficacy, but that the survey design currently recommended by WHO (SS) should be updated. Our generic framework, which captures laboratory time and material costs, can be used to further support cost-efficient choices for other important surveys informing STH control programs. In addition, it can be used to explore the value of alternative diagnostic techniques, like automated egg counting, which may further reduce operational costs.Author SummaryLarge-scale deworming programs are implemented worldwide to reduce morbidity caused by intestinal worms. As these programs operate in resource-poor-settings, it is important that their operational costs are minimized without jeopardizing the quality of decision-making. We present a framework for evidence-based recommendations for cost-efficient decision-making in deworming programs, using monitoring of therapeutic drug efficacy via stool examination as a case study. To this end, we first assessed the time and the cost of processing stool samples in a laboratory according to different diagnostic methods. Then for each diagnostic method, survey design, and a range of settings (pre-dominant worm species and pre-treatment infection levels), we calculated the probability of correctly detecting a truly reduced therapeutic drug efficacy and the associated operational costs. Generally, the estimated operational costs varied across diagnostic method, survey design, worm species and disease endemicity. Based on our findings, we conclude that the use of the current diagnostic standard, the Kato-Katz method, is justified to assess drug efficacy, but that a change in survey design is warranted. Our methodology, which leverages detailed data on laboratory time and material costs, can also be used to provide evidence-based recommendations for other types of decisions in large-scale deworming programs.