bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
CRI-CCTG-0003/IND.240: An immunotherapy platform study in platinum-resistant high grade serous ovarian cancer (IPROC).
Authors: Mackay Helen , Tinker Anna , Nelson Brad , Zamarin Dmitriy , Odunsi Kunle , Lheureux Stephanie , Ellard Susan , Smrke Alannah , Gaudreau Pierre-Olivier , Faulkner Tess , Saez-Ibanez Ana Rosa , Tu Dongsheng , Dancey Janet Ellen 
Published: June 2023

TPS5617 Background: Identifying new treatments for patients with platinum-resistant high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) is a priority. Although several biological features of HGSC suggest inherent immunogenicity, immunotherapy has had limited efficacy to date. IPROC is an adaptive platform trial designed to evaluate multiple immunotherapy combinations selected and informed by an expert panel. IPROC accommodates both biomarker-agnostic and biomarker-directed combinations. Protocol and sub study specific translational studies are conducted on archived diagnostic tissue and serial prospective blood and tumor sample collection. Methods: IPROC is an open-label, multi center, phase II platform trial. Eligibility includes HGSC histology; progression within 6 months of the last platinum regimen; <1 prior line of chemotherapy for platinum resistant disease (unlimited prior lines for platinum sensitive); prior treatment with immunotherapy allowed (provided not discontinued for toxicity), ECOG 0/1. Patients must be willing and able to undergo study procedures. The primary endpoint is ORR (RECIST1.1). Secondary endpoints include iRECIST ORR, RECIST/iRECIST progression free and overall survival and safety. Exploratory objectives include whole exome sequencing and immune profiling of tumor and blood samples to identify biomarkers and new immunotherapy strategies/combinations for future evaluation. Tumor biopsy occurs at baseline, cycle 2 and progression (voluntary) with blood and plasma collected at each cycle and on progression. All sub studies use Simon 2-stage design with 10 patients (pts) enrolled in each stage. At the end of stage 1, in the absence of response, a modified cohort based on biomarker selection may be created through protocol amendment. In each substudy a null hypothesis that the objective response rate (ORR) is ≤5% is tested against a one-sided alternative that the ORR is ≥ 25%. A combination would be accepted as active if ≥4/20 pts respond with α=0.02 and power of 0.76. As of January 19, 2023, 2 sub studies are open and 12 patients have accrued. Sub study A is evaluating the combination of durvalumab and BA3011, a conditionally active anti-AXL humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG1) conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) in AXL overexpressing HGSC. Sub study B is evaluating durvalumab plus BA3021, a CAB anti-receptor tyrosine kinase orphan receptor 2 (ROR2) humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG1) conjugated to MMAE in ROR2 overexpressing HGSC. Further sub studies are planned (NCT04918186). Clinical trial information: NCT04918186 .
First trial of chemotherapy de-escalation in ovarian cancer (OC): A phase III randomized, open label study of niraparib maintenance after carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally debulked advanced (homologous recombination deficient) HRD high-grade ovarian cancer in first line therapy (N-PLUS/NOGGO-ov53/ENGOT-ov62).
Authors: Braicu Elena Ioana , Pietzner Klaus , Zocholl Dario , Estévez-García Purificación , Katsaros Dionyssios , Van Gorp Toon , Berger Regina , Keller Maren , Sehouli Jalid 
Published: June 2023

TPS5620 Background: OC is the fifth most common cause of death from cancer in women. More than 70% of the patients are diagnosed with advanced disease and less than 40% of women with OC are cured. Currently, the standard therapy in HRD OC is surgical debulking followed by 6 cycles of chemotherapy with subsequent maintenance treatment with poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Within the last decades, no focus was set on the benefits of fewer cycles of chemotherapy, even though there is evidence for comparable efficacy and less toxicity in comparison to more cycles. Chemotherapies are usually associated with side effects, which can be severe and even lead to therapy discontinuation. The data available about the needed number of chemotherapy cycles is weak, especially in the context of PARP inhibition. Furthermore, patients with stage III/IV with optimal cytoreduction are underrepresented in previous studies. In the N-PLUS trial, we hypothesize that recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients receiving 3 cycles of chemotherapy followed by maintenance with niraparib is not inferior to 6 cycles of chemotherapy followed by niraparib in advanced HRD high-grade OC patients with no visible disease following primary tumor debulking. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label study 650 patients with advanced HRD high-grade OC with no residual tumor mass following primary tumor debulking will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 3 cycles carboplatin + paclitaxel and maintenance therapy with niraparib (Arm A) or 6 cycles carboplatin + paclitaxel and maintenance therapy with niraparib (Arm B) for a maximum of 36 months. Randomization will be performed according to the results of the NGS analysis and stratified either to BRCAm/LOH-independent or BRCAwt/LOHhigh, FIGO stage III vs. IV, and participating countries. The primary endpoint will be RFS, secondary endpoints will be OS, TFST, TWIST, PFS2, Quality of Life and safety assessments. Clinical trial information: NCT05460000 .
GLORIOSA: A randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of mirvetuximab soravtansine with bevacizumab vs. bevacizumab as maintenance in platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.
Authors: O'Malley David M. , Myers Tashanna K. N. , Zamagni Claudio , Diver Elisabeth , Lorusso Domenica 
Published: June 2023

TPS5622 Background: Elevated folate receptor-alpha (FRα) expression is a characteristic of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), thereby providing a rational target for antibody drug conjugate (ADC) development in ovarian cancer. Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is an ADC comprising a FRα-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid DM4, a potent tubulin-targeting agent that has received accelerated approval for patients with FRα positive platinum resistant ovarian cancer. MIRV in combination with BEV has demonstrated clinically meaningful activity, along with acceptable tolerability, in patients with FRα expressing ovarian cancer.1 Methods: GLORIOSA is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study designed to evaluate the efficacy of in combination with bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone as maintenance for patients with FRα-positive recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancers who have not progressed after second line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (which may be given on protocol for patients with high FRα tumor expression). Confirmation of high FRα positivity by immunohistochemistry using the Ventana FOLR1 CDx Assay (high expression; ≥ 75% of viable tumor cells staining at 2+ intensity) and 1 prior line of therapy is required for inclusion. GLORIOSA is designed to randomize 418 patients, 1:1 receiving intravenous MIRV at a dose of 6 mg/kg adjusted ideal body weight plus bevacizumab 15mg/kg every 3 weeks or receiving bevacizumab 15mg/kg every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Radiological assessments will be conducted every 9 weeks (± 2 weeks) for 72 weeks, and subsequently every 18 weeks (± 3 weeks) until progressive disease (PD), death, the start of new anticancer therapy, or withdrawal of consent from the study (whichever occurs first). The primary efficacy endpoint is progression-free survival by investigator and will also be assessed as a sensitivity analysis. The secondary endpoints include objective response rate, quality of life, overall survival, and safety and tolerability. GLORIOSA is a global study that opened for enrollment in December 2022. Reference: 1. Gilbert L, Oaknin A, Matulonis UA, et al. Safety and efficacy of mirvetuximab soravtansine, a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in combination with bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2023; 170: 241–247 Clinical trial information: NCT05445778 .
CCTG EN10: A phase II study of tailored adjuvant therapy in POLE-mutated and p53-wildtype/NSMP early-stage endometrial cancer (EC)—RAINBO BLUE and TAPER.
Authors: McAlpine Jessica N. , Han Kathy Chai-Zung , Kinloch Mary , Barkati Maroie , Ferguson Sarah E. , Fyles Anthony W. , Huang Fleur , Kong Iwa , Kwon Janice S. , Mackay Helen , Carey Mark Stafford , Welch Stephen , Bosse Tjalling , Creutzberg Carien L. , Horeweg Nanda , Leary Alexandra , Liu WenLing , Tu Dongsheng , Parulekar Wendy R. 
Published: June 2023

TPS5632 Background: Molecular classification of EC provides an opportunity to personalize treatment for patients with early disease based on prognosis. We hypothesize that de-escalated adjuvant treatment in patients with early-stage POLE-mutated ( POLEmut) or p53wt/NSMP (p53 wildtype/no specific molecular profile) EC is feasible and associated with favourable disease control, QOL and health economics. Methods: EN.10 is a Canadian Cancer Trials Group led phase II trial that enrolls two independent cohorts of patients with early stage EC based on tumour molecular status: POLEmut (substudy A) and p53wt/NSMP (substudy B). The primary objective is to estimate the 3-year rate of pelvic recurrence. Secondary objectives include estimated 3-year isolated vaginal recurrence, para-aortic recurrence, distant metastasis, survival (recurrence-free, EC-specific, overall survival) and to describe the patient decisional conflict and fear of recurrence. Tertiary objectives: QOL, economic evaluation and interrogation/discovery of additional prognostic biomarkers. Statistical Design: Registration to Substudy A or B is based on molecular classification. Treatment will be deescalated in both substudies; to surveillance-only (all early stage POLEmut, and a proportion of NSMP), or vaginal brachytherapy (proportion of NSMP), with NSMP stratification based on histological grade, and lymphovascular invasion. Substudy A can enroll endometrioid, serous, clear cell, un/dedifferentiated and carcinosarcomas whereas Substudy B is confined to endometrioid histotype. Both arms require ECOG 0-2 and hysterectomy+BSO with nodal assessment required for stage II and grade 3 EC. A total of 120 patients with POLEmut (Sub-study A) and 180 with p53wt/NSMP ER+ (Sub-study B) EC will be recruited in 3 years. If the upper 95% confidence limit is less than 5% in either of Substudy A, Cohort A1 and Sub-study B or both, it will be concluded that patients in one or both groups have an acceptable low risk of pelvic recurrence at 3 years with molecularly-tailored de-escalated adjuvant treatment An additional estimated 25 patients with higher risk POLEmut EC will be enrolled for an exploratory analysis. Conduct to Date: Study activation Dec 19 2022. Enrollment January 31, 2023: 36 Supported by Canadian Cancer Society, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Gynecologic Cancer Initiative, BC Cancer Foundation. Clinical trial information: NCT05640999 .
A phase 2 open-label study of conditionally active biologic ozuriftamab vedotin (BA3021) in failed PD-1/L1 treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Authors: Ho Alan Loh , Adkins Douglas , Lorch Jochen H. , Thomas Jacob Stephen , Grewal Jaspreet Singh 
Published: June 2023

TPS6107 Background: Ozuriftamab vedotin (BA3021) is a conditionally active biologic (CAB) anti-receptor tyrosine kinase orphan receptor 2 (ROR2) humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG1) conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) using a cleavable linker (CAB ROR2 ADC) (Short, et al., 2014, Chang, et al. 2021). Conditional and reversible binding by CABs is designed to reduce off-tumor toxicity and immunogenicity, avoid tissue-mediated drug deposition, and improve pharmacokinetics (PK). ROR2 is a cell-surface transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase highly expressed in several tumor types including head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Increased ROR2 expression has been associated with tumor resistance to chemotherapy, programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, molecular targeted therapy, and radiation therapy. A pronounced unmet need exists as the majority of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC experience disease progression with existing therapies (Chow 2020). Methods: BA3021-002 is a multi-center, open-label, single-arm Phase 2 study (n=40) designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BA3021 in patients previously treated with PD-(L)1 with ROR-2 expressing recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. Eligible patients include those with measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 criteria. Failure to prior treatment is defined as documented disease progression after no more than one PD-1/L1 inhibitor either administered as monotherapy or in combination therapy. Pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), immunogenicity, and biomarker assessments will be performed. Enrollment is ongoing (NCT05271604) References: Chang, H.W., Frey, G., Liu, H., Steinman, L., Boyle, W.J. and Short, J.M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2021 Mar. 2; 118(9). Chow LQ. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 2;382(1):60–72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1715715. Short, J.M. Nature Biotechnology 2014 Nov 8, 13(20). Clinical trial information: NCT05271604 .
Response-adapted therapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on clinical response and circulating Epstein-Barr virus DNA level post induction chemotherapy.
Authors: Hu Chaosu , Ou Xiaomin 
Published: June 2023

TPS6112 Background: For locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), the mainstay treatment is cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). Recent phase III clinical trials have demonstrated that induction chemotherapy (ICT) plus CCRT, compared with CCRT alone, further improved progression-free survival (PFS). However, not every patient has good response to ICT. Evidence has accumulated that those with poor response to ICT, or those with detectable Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA post ICT, correlated with poorer PFS. In addition, real-time monitoring of plasma EBV DNA response adds prognostic information, and has the potential utility for risk-adapted treatment intensification in NPC. The aim of this study is to clarify whether response-adapted strategy based on clinical efficacy and EBV DNA response confers survival benefit to patients with locally advanced NPC. Methods: This is an open-label, 3-arm, phase II study. Patients with pathologically confirmed, locally advanced NPC (III-IVA, excluding T3N0M0, 8th AJCC staging system), with pretreatment detectable plasma EBV DNA level and ECOS PS 0-1 were eligible. Patients will receive one cycle of GP-based ICT. After one cycle of ICT, plasma EBV DNA and head and neck MR are performed. Based on clinical efficacy (evaluated per RECIST 1.1 criteria) and changes of plasma EBV DNA after one cycle, patients will be divided into three arms. Patients with good response (Arm A: Early Responders, undetectable EBV DNA level and CR/PR) will directly receive CCRT. Patients with intermediate response (Arm B: Intermediate Responders, detectable EBV DNA and CR/PR/decreased SD; or undetectable EBV DNA yet without CR/PR) will be randomized to experiment subgroup (GP combined with Toripalimab for two additional cycles then CCRT and maintenance Toripalimab treatment) and standard subgroup (GP for two additional cycles then CCRT). Patients with poor response (Arm C: Treatment Resistant, increased EBV DNA level, or PD/enlarged SD) will be switched to TP regimen combined with Toripalimab, followed by CCRT and maintenance Toripalimab treatment. Sample size calculation is based on 2-year PFS rate for arm B as the primary endpoint (one-sided α = 0.10, power = 0.80). Our target sample size is estimated to be 198-240, among them 168 for arm B. Secondary endpoints include adverse events determined by CTCAE v5.0, ORR at 3 months post-CRT, 2-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rate, 2-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, as well as quality of Life for arm B. Exploratory endpoints include 2-year PFS rate, LRFS rate, DMFS rate, OS rate, ORR at 3 months post-CRT, adverse effects, and quality of life for arm A and arm C. This trial opened to accrual in July 2022 and the recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05628922 .
MRD assay to evaluate recurrence and response via a tumor-informed assessment: MARIA-Breast observational trial.
Authors: Esplin Edward D. , Swan Kelli , Ifhar Lee , Heald Brandie , Nielsen Sarah M. , Pineda Alvarez Daniel Esteban , O'Callaghan William D. , Daber Robert , Chaudhuri Aadel A 
Published: June 2023

TPS622 Background: The recognition that cancers release nucleic acids into the peripheral circulation of the patient has enabled a new paradigm for disease detection and surveillance. Detectable ctDNA in patients with solid tumors has been associated with disease prognosis pre-treatment, assessing response to therapy in the form of minimal residual disease (MRD), and monitoring for recurrence after curative intent treatment. Utilizing patient-specific genomic mutation profiling of an individual’s cancer from a tissue sample, in conjunction with the patient’s germline DNA, to create a personalized sequencing panel to then systematically analyze for a subset of these genetic mutations from ctDNA in blood is a strategy that has high sensitivity in detection of MRD. Studies have shown that pretreatment levels of ctDNA using this approach are a potential early indicator of disease recurrence after surgery, that ctDNA clearance may be an early predictor of favorable outcomes and have been shown to correlate with pathologic complete response (Forde et al. N Engl J Med. 2022, PMID:35403841), and that this approach has high sensitivity in its ability to detect recurrence for patients in advance of the current standard of care (Abbosh et al. Cancer Res (2020) 80 (16_Supplement): CT023). Methods: This is a multi-site, prospective, observational trial in the United States of 200 patients with early stage breast cancer undergoing curative intent treatment, who have FFPE tissue available from resection sufficient for a patient-specific bespoke MRD assay who are willing to provide serial whole blood specimens for ctDNA analysis. Participants are asked to provide study specimens prior to initial treatment intervention, after curative intent surgical resection, during adjuvant therapy (as applicable) and pre-recurrence follow-up. ctDNA will be analyzed with an NGS-based, tumor-informed MRD assay that identifies somatic mutations from DNA obtained from the patient’s tumor tissue, subtracts germline variants via NGS-based analysis of the patients germline DNA, and detects a selected set of between 18-50 tumor-specific ctDNA in their blood. All primary tumor specimens will undergo full exome sequencing using the Personalized Cancer Monitoring (PCM) assay. Impact of results of this CLIA-approved MRD assay on clinical decision making will be captured. The primary objective is to assess the ability of MRD to predict post-treatment recurrence. Further objectives are to correlate MRD status with pathologic complete response, determine the lead time to detection of recurrence compared to standard of care, and the association of MRD status with overall survival. Active enrollment started in March, 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05219734 .
ORACLE-RIPA study: A phase II, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study comparing the immune modulation effect of neoadjuvant ribociclib, palbociclib, and abemaciclib in early ER+/HER2- breast cancer.
Authors: Chen I-Chun , Lin Ching-Hung , Chang Dwan-Ying , Chen Tom Wei-Wu , Ma Wei-li , Wang Ming-Yang , Lu Yen-Shen 
Published: June 2023

TPS632 Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), ribociclib, palbociclib, and abemaciclib, provide similar progression-free survival (PFS) benefits when combined with endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. However, not all CDK4/6i have demonstrated overall-survival (OS) benefits in their respective phase III trials. Both, ribociclib and abemaciclib, have shown significant OS benefits in ER+/HER2- MBC patients, but palbociclib has not. Because of similar benefits of the 3 CDK4/6i on PFS, the OS benefit is likely not a result of differences in their synergistic efficacy of a CDK4/6i with endocrine therapy. CDK4 inhibition on cancer cells can also result in upregulation of MHC-I and MHC-II expression on cell surface and Rb-dependent interferon-gamma secretion. CDK6 inhibition might inhibit T cell and NK cell proliferation causing a negative effect on the tumor microenvironment. CDK6 inhibition can also reduce regulatory T cell numbers and increase cytokine production to enhance cytotoxic T cell function. Thus, we hypothesize that the differential impact of the 3 CDK4/6i on OS might be resulting from different immunomodulation effects. To investigate the functional alterations of the CDK4/6i on the BC microenvironment, the neoadjuvant treatment setting is best to compare the immune modulation effects of CDK4/6i from pre-treatment and post-treatment tumor tissues. Methods: This phase II multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study evaluates the immunomodulation effects of the 3 different CDK4/6i (ribociclib, palbociclib, or abemaciclib) combined with letrozole in neoadjuvant early ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. A total of 20 patients will be enrolled into each treatment arm. The major inclusion criteria are female patients aged ≥ 20 years old, having a histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of ER+ ( > 10%) and/or PR+, HER2 negative (IHC 0+/1+, or IHC 2+ plus FISH negative) breast cancer, stage II/III, and adequate organ function. The treatment will12 weeks of letrozole plus a CDK4/6i. Premenopausal patients will receive GnRH agonist. Breast tumor biopsy, blood and stool samples will be collected prospectively at the time prior to treatment initiation, at 2 weeks after treatment, and at surgery. A description summary will be utilized to compare the results between the 3 CDK4/6i. The trial results will address questions about differences or similarities of the 3 CDK4/6i within the same study. The study is currently enrolling at 3 medical centers s in Taiwan. Clinical trial information: Pending formal number assignment .