Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
Authors: Etoh Tsuyoshi , Ohyama Tetsuji , Sakuramoto Shinichi , Tsuji Toshikatsu , Lee Sang-Woong , Yoshida Kazuhiro , Koeda Keisuke , Hiki Naoki , Kunisaki Chikara , Tokunaga Masanori , Otsubo Dai , Takagane Akinori , Misawa Kazunari , Kinoshita Takahiro , Cho Haruhiko , Doki Yuichiro , Nunobe Souya , Shiraishi Norio , Kitano Seigo ,   Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group (JLSSG), Sakon Masahiro , Kodera Yasuhiro , Kubo Naoshi , Kitagawa Yuko , Hagiwara Ken , Mikami Shinya , Yasuda Atsushi , Watanabe Yuji , Terashima Masanori , Tanaka Hiroaki , Togano Shingo , Fujiwara Toshiyoshi , Ikeda Osamu , Noshiro Hirokazu , Hasegawa Suguru , Ohuchida Kenoki , Kuwabara Shirou , Yoshida Toru , Amaya Susumu , Kakeji Yoshihiro , Ehara Kazuhisa , Kojima Kazuyuki , Takiguchi Shuji , Inaki Noriyuki 
Published: March 2023

ImportanceEvidence of implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer is currently insufficient, as the primary end point in previous prospective studies was evaluated at a median follow-up time of 3 years. More robust evidence is necessary to verify noninferiority of laparoscopic gastrectomy.ObjectiveTo compare 5-year survival outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, prospective randomized clinical trial. Between November 26, 2009, and July 29, 2016, eligible patients with histologically proven gastric carcinoma from 37 institutes in Japan were enrolled. Two interim analyses and final analysis were performed in October 2014, May 2018, and November 2021, respectively.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the ODG or LADG group. The procedures were performed exclusively by qualified surgeons.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was 5-year relapse-free survival, and the noninferiority margin for the hazard ratio (HR) was set at 1.31. The secondary end points were 5-year overall survival and safety.ResultsA total of 502 patients were included in the full-analysis set: 254 (50.6%) in the ODG group and 248 (49.4%) in the LADG group. Patients in the ODG group had a median (IQR) age of 67 (33-80) years and included 168 males (66.1%). Patients in the LADG group had a median (IQR) age of 64 (34-80) years and included 169 males (68.1%). No significant differences were observed in severe postoperative complications between the 2 groups in the safety analysis (ODG, 4.7% [11 of 233] vs LADG, 3.5% [8 of 227]; P = .64). The median (IQR) follow-up for all patients after randomization was 67.9 (60.3-92.0) months. The 5-year relapse-free survival was 73.9% (95% CI, 68.7%-79.5%) and 75.7% (95% CI, 70.5%-81.2%) for the ODG and LADG groups, respectively, and the HR was 0.96 (90% CI, 0.72-1.26; noninferiority 1-sided P = .03). Further, no significant difference was observed in overall survival time between the 2 groups, and the HR was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.57-1.21; P = .34). The pattern of recurrence was similar between the 2 groups.Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this study show that on the basis of 5-year follow-up data, LADG with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer, when performed by qualified surgeons, was proved noninferior to ODG. This laparoscopic approach could become a standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer.Trial RegistrationUMIN Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000003420