bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
The Kindness Group
Authors: Johnson Paul , Lamothe Kim 
Published: May 2023

All students in their senior year in the BSW Undergraduate Program at the University of Southern Maine are required to complete a yearlong field work placement. To support and enhance this process, the students also attend a weekly seminar for the entire academic year. In addition, students are required to complete a Capstone Project. The intent of this Project is that it will have a lasting impact after the student has left their placement. Over the course of the academic year 2017-2018, Kim Lamothe was placed at a Middle School in the Mid Coast region of Maine. For her Capstone Project, Kim came up with the concept of the Kindness Group after reviewing the School’s mission statement, which talked about providing a safe, positive environment for all students whereby respect and appreciation for all differences is the norm. Using her assessment skills and theories that she had covered in her other social work classes, Kim realized that the School could do a better job in realizing these goals. The Kindness Group was an open group. Flyers were distributed throughout the School encouraging students to attend. The Group also used actionable activities, for example, students designed posters and t-shirts. They had a Twin and Triplets Day in which students coordinated outfits. Students were encouraged to listen to their peers and try and imagine what it must be like to walk in their shoes. As part of the long-term legacy activity, the students along with a number of community partners held a yellow tulip project. In the fall semester, they planted hundreds of tulip bulbs. These bulbs all bloomed in the spring and the students dedicated these tulips to those who were suffering from mental illness. Each week in the seminar Kim discussed the Kindness Group. She talked about the successes and frustrations of the Group and all of her peers were extremely supportive. At the end of the academic year, Kim presented her Capstone Project to the class. Everyone was extremely impressed with the work she had undertaken. In addition, Kim and I presented this work at the IASWG 2019 Symposium at NYU. Again, at the Symposium Kim was met with numerous accolades. It was apparent to all that this peer support group had created and cultivated a positive inclusive environment for all.
Application of CHAT Analysis to a Community-Based Action Team
Authors: Casstevens Willa , Stansbury Kim 
Published: May 2023

This study applies cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) to a community-based racial equity and social justice action group in the American South. The community action group is referred to as a “team” by participants and by its host community. The CHAT framework applied incorporates Vygotsky’s mediated action triangle and holds that learning can occur within any activity system. Using CHAT, it is possible to clarify points of tension that occurred within the action team during the community-based team’s first year of development. Reflecting on points of tension within the CHAT framework supported appropriate modifications to the team’s development. This application of the CHAT framework demonstrates ways CHAT could be applied to support leadership assessment and constructive follow-up on areas of tension in a community group, thereby contributing to group maintenance and ongoing well-being.
Keywords: community action group, racial equity, social justice, CHAT
Considering the rules of brainstorming in untrained idea generating groups
Authors: Henningsen David Dryden , Henningsen Mary Lynn 
Published: May 2023

Brainstorming (Osborn, 1957), as an idea generating technique, is widely used in businesses and organizations despite evidence that it fails to produce more ideas than non-interacting groups (e.g., Mullen, Johnson, & Salas, 1991). Past tests of the technique employ comparisons of groups instructed to follow the rules of brainstorming (i.e., focus on quantity, free-wheeling, non-evaluation, and piggy-backing) to groups without such instructions. In the current study, the connection between the activities proposed in the rules of brainstorming and idea generation are examined. The perceived occurrence of these activities are examined in untrained idea generating groups to assess how they influence idea generation. 188 participants (61% men, 39% women), performed an idea generation task (i.e., the typewriter task) and assessed perceptions of the occurrence of the activities highlighted by the brainstorming rules in the group discussion. Overall, perceptions of brainstorming rules influence the number of ideas generated with piggy-backing emerging as a significant predictor variable.
Kinerja Guru pada Sistem Belajar Work From Home Terhadap Kreativitas Mengajar dan Respon Orangtua Siswa
Authors: Agustiningsih Neneng , Nilawati  
Published: May 2023

The purpose of this study was to determine relationship between teacher performance in the work from home learning system and the relationship between teacher performance in the work from home learning system and parents' responses at PAUD Semai Harapan Bangsa Jempong Mataram. This study uses a quantitative approach with an ex post facto type, The data collection process in this study came from respondent questionnaires, from a population of 62 parents of students, and 28 samples using the random sampling technique for teachers from a population of 8 people and the same sample, namely 8 people using the saturated sampling technique at PAUD Semai Harapan Bangsa Jempong Mataram. The results of data processing using correlation analysis in obtaining the conclusion that (-0,919) < (0,337), meaning that there is no relationship between teacher performance in the work from home learning system and teacher teaching activity (-0,971) < (0,337), meaning that there is no relationship between teacher performance in the work from home learning system and the response of parents in Semai Harapan Bangsa Jempong Mataram PAUD.
Penerapan Field Study Mata Kuliah Perencanaan dan Evaluasi Anak Usia Dini Melalui Platform Zoom dengan Google Classroom
Authors: Ulfadhilah Khairunnisa 
Published: May 2023

Adanya mengalami perubahan sangat signifikan yakni pembelajaran secara online dari jenjang anak usia dini hingga mahasiswa. Mahasiswa Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga mengikuti aturan yang sudah ada yakni online menggunakan platfrom yang sudah ditentukan oleh dosen, dosen mata kuliah Perencanaan dan Evaluasi Anak Usia Dini menggunakan platfrom zoom dengan gcr. Adanya kegiatan Fieldy Study di jurusan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini untuk melakukan mengajar pada mahasiswa semester 4, dan menemukan proses pembelajaran mahasiswa semester 4 melalui zoom dengan gcr. Penelitian ini menggunakan kualitatif untuk mendeskripsikan temuan yang telah diteliti kemudian dicatat. Teknik pengumpulan data ialah dengan wawancara, dokumentasi, dan observasi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa pembelajaran online mata kuliah Perencanaan dan Evaluasi Anak Usia Dini melalui platfrom Zoom dengan GCR sudah efektif. Selain itu, pembelajaran menggunakan system online mendapat respon dari mahasiswa terdapat lebih fleksibel namun terdapat beberapa mahasiswa menemukan kendala dengan signal, dan pembelajaran kurang maksimal. Adanya aplikasi penghubung antara dosen dengan mahasiswa untuk proses belajar mengajar dilakukan selama adanya pandemi Covid-19, dan mahasiswa menerima pemahaman maupun penjelasan yang diutarakan oleh dosen.
KAJIAN KESESUAIAN TATA CARA PENGHENTIAN PENUNTUTAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN BERDASARKAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE (Studi Surat Penghentian Penuntutan Nomor: PRINT- 507/L.2.34/Eoh.2/03/2021)
Authors: Ramadhani Aulia , Herdyanto Edy 
Published: May 2023

<div class="WordSection1"><p><strong><em>AB</em></strong><strong><em>S</em></strong><strong><em>T</em></strong><strong><em>RA</em></strong><strong><em>K</em></strong>: <em>Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dalam kasus tindak pidana penganiayaan yang dilakukan penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan restorative justice karena kesepakatan dua belah pihak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan penjelasan mengenai kesesuaian syarat syarat serta tata cara penghentian penuntutan perkara tindak pidana penganiayaan berdasarkan restorative justice dengan ketentuan Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia no 15 tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Jenis Penelitian hukum ini normatif dan bersifat preskriptif. Diketahui dalam proses penghentian penuntutan yang dilakukan oleh penuntut umum yang tertuang dalam Surat Penghentian Penuntutan Nomor: PRINT-507/L.2.34/Eoh.2/03/2021 bahwa penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan restorative</em> <em>justice dengan terdakwa Muammer Khadapi Siregar sesuai dengan Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia no 15 tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.</em></p><p><em>K</em><em>ata Kunci : Penghentian Penuntutan, Penganiayaan, Restorative Justice</em></p><br clear="ALL" /><p><strong><em>AB</em></strong><strong><em>S</em></strong><strong><em>T</em></strong><strong><em>RAC</em></strong><strong><em>T</em></strong>: <em>This study shows that in the case of a criminal act of persecution, the termination</em> <em>of prosecution is based on restorative justice because of the agreement of two parties. This study aims to provide an explanation of the suitability of the conditions and procedures for stopping prosecution of criminal acts of persecution based on restorative justice with the provisions of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Regulation No. 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution based on Restorative Justice. This type of legal research is normative and prescriptive. It is known in the process of stopping the prosecution carried out by the public prosecutor as stated in the Termination of Prosecution Letter Number: PRINT-507/L.2.34/Eoh.2/03/2021 that the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice with the defendant Muammer Khadapi Siregar is in accordance with the Regulations of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution based on Restorative Justice.</em></p><p><em>K</em><em>e</em><em>y</em><em>w</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>ds: Termination of Prosecution, Persecution, Restorative Justice</em></p></div>
PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG MENGADILI PERKARA PENGGELAPAN DENGAN JABATAN (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 82 K/Pid/2019)
Authors: Johan F Faesal , Kristiyadi ' 
Published: May 2023

<p><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong><em>: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan pengajuan Kasasi Penuntut Umum dalam perkara penggelapan dalam jabatan disesuaikan dengan ketentuan yang terdapat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Diketahui bahwa pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan pengajuan Kasasi Penuntut Umum dalam perkara tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan telah sesuai Pasal 256 jo Pasal 193 ayat (1) KUHAP, Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan permohonan Kasasi Penuntut Umum dan membatalkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 571/Pid.B/2018/PN.Sby. Mahakamah kemudian mengadili sendiri perkara tersebut dan menjatuhkan pidana penjara selama 1 (satu) tahun dan 6 (enam) bulan.</em></p><p><em>Kata Kunci: Kasasi, Pertimbangan Hakim, Tindak Pidana Penggelapan. </em></p><p><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong><em>: his study aims to determine the consideration of the Supreme Court granting the appeal of the Public Prosecutor in the case of embezzlement in an office adjusted to the provisions contained in the Criminal Procedure Code. The research method used is normative legal research. The approach used is the approach of law and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. It is known that the Supreme Court's consideration of granting the Public Prosecution Appeals in the case of embezzlement in accordance with Article 256 jo Article 193 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Supreme Court granted the appeal of the Public Prosecutor's Appeal and canceled the Surabaya District Court Decision Number 571 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN.Sby. Mahakamah then tried the case himself and sentenced him to prison for 1 (one) year and 6 (six) months.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: Cassation, Judge Considerations, Embezzlement.</em></strong></p>
PERAN DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN AHLI IT (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY) DAN BAHASA DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK MELALUI FACEBOOK
Authors: Ghinawati Dewi 
Published: May 2023

<p><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong><em>: P</em><em>e</em><em>nelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis mengenai urgensi kehadiran ahli IT dan Bahasa dalam persidangan perkara pencemaran nama baik melalui Pasal 186 Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Penelitian hukum ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat perskriptif dan terapan dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus (case study). Penulis menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik yang dipakai dalam pengumpulan bahan hukum dalam penulisan hukum ini adalah studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumen (Library Research). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan ini, diperoleh bahwa keterangan ahli sangatlah penting untuk disertakan dalam persidangan. Sesuai dengan Pasal 186 KUHAP yang menjelaskan pengertian khusus dari istilah “keterangan ahli”, yaitu, “Keterangan ahli ialah apa yang seorang ahli nyatakan di sidang pengadilan”, maka keterangan ahli harus diberikan/dinyatakan di hadapan persidangan secara langsung.</em></p><p><em>Kata kunci: Pembuktian, Keterangan ahli IT dan Bahasa, Perkara pencemaran nama baik.</em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong><em>: T</em><em>his study aims to analyze the urgency of the presence of IT and Language expert in trial of defamation case through the Article 186 of Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This legal research is a normative and applied normative legal research using a case study. The author uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique used in gathering legal material in the writing of this law is the study of literature or study of documents (Library Research). Based on the results of this research and discussion, it was obtained that expert testimony is very important to be included in the trial. In accordance with the Article 186 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) which explains the special meaning of the term "expert statement", that is, "Expert statement is what an expert declares in a court hearing", then expert statements must be given / stated during trial directly.</em></p><p><em>Keywords: Burden of Proof, Expert statement of IT (Information Technology) and Language, Defamation case</em></p>
ANALISIS ALASAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG MEMBATALKAN PUTUSAN JUDEX FACTI DALAM KASUS PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Nomor 104k/Pid.Sus/2018)
Authors: Zaky Pahlevi Muhammad Rezi 
Published: May 2023

<p><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong><em>: Pe</em><em>nelitian Hukum ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hal-hal yang menjadi alas an</em> <em>Mahkamah Agung dalam memutus sebuah perkara dalam tingkat Kasasi sesuai Pasal</em> <em>255 ayat (1) KUHAP dan, dasar pertimbangan hukum Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan pengajuan kasasi penuntut umum atas dasar hakim salah menerapkan hukum pembuktian unsur penyalahgunaan narkotika golongan I bagi diri sendiri sesuai Pasal</em> <em>256 KUHAP. Menggunakan metode penelitian diantaranya: jenis penelitian hukum</em> <em>normatif atau doctrinal research, bersifat perskriptif, dan pendekatan kasus serta bahan hukumnya yaitu hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penulisan hukum ini adalah dedukasi silogisme yaitu merumuskan fakta hukum dengan cara membuat konklusi atas premis mayor dan premis minor pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 104 K/Pid.sus/2018. Berdasarkan kasus ini, Pengadilan Negeri telah salah menerapkan hukum maka sesuai dengan Pasal 255 ayat (1) KUHAP Mahkamah Agung membatalkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri dan mengadili sendiri (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 104 K/Pid.sus/2018), dan pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan pengajuan Kasasi oleh Penuntut Umum telah sesuai dengan Pasal 112 ayat (1) Terdakwa dalam tingkat kasasi terbukti terlibat tanpa hak atau melawan hukum menanam, memelihara, memiliki, menyimpan, menguasai, atau menyediakan Narkotika Golongan I dalam bentuk bukan tanaman</em><em>. </em></p><p><em>K</em><em>ata kunci: Hakim Agung, Judex Facti, Narkotika.</em></p><p><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong><em>: T</em><em>his Legal Research aims to determine the consideration of the Supreme Court Judge The reason for the Supreme Court in deciding a case at the Cassation level. Using research methods include: types of normative or doctrinal research, descriptive, and case approaches and legal materials namely primary and secondary law. The legal material analysis technique that I use in writing this law is syllogism education, namely formulating legal facts by concluding the major premise and minor premise on the Supreme Court Decision Number 104 K / Pid.sus / 2017. Based on this case where the District Court has wrongly applied the law, according to Article 255 paragraph (1) of the KUHAP the Supreme Court overturned the District Court's decision and tried itself (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 104 K / Pid.sus / 2017), and consideration of the Supreme Court granted the filing of Cassation by the Public Prosecutor is in accordance with Article 112 paragraph (1) because The defendant at the cassation level is proven to be involved without rights or against the law planting, maintaining,possessing, keeping, controlling, or providing Narcotics Category I in non-plant form.</em></p><p><em>Keywords: Chief Justice, Judex Facti, Narcotics</em></p>
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI MENURUT UU PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN
Authors: Azzahra Ardiva Naufaliz 
Published: May 2023

<p><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong><em>: Pe</em><em>nelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pentingnya pengaturan perlindungan hukum bagi Justice Collaborator dalam tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Penulisan Hukum ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan perlindungan hukum bagi Justice Collaborator dalam tindak pidana korupsi sesuai dengan UU Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas UU Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Metode penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preksriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan Undang-Undang (Statue approach). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis diperoleh bahwa perlindungan hukum bagi Justice Collaborator tidak diatur secara tegas di Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006. Perlindungan hukum Justice Collaborator dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 berbentuk perlindungan fisik dan psikis, perlindungan hukum, penanganan khusus, dan penghargaan (reward).</em></p><p><em>Kata Kunci : Pelindungan Hukum, Justice Collaborator, Korupsi</em></p><p> <strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong><em>: T</em><em>his study shows the importance of regulating legal protection for Justice Collaborators in criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia. This legal writing aims to determine the legal protection arrangements for Justice Collaborators in criminal acts of corruption in accordance with Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims. This research method is a</em> <em>normative legal research that is prescriptive by using a state approach. Based on the results of research conducted by the author, it was found that legal protection for Justice Collaborators is not explicitly regulated in Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006. Legal protection of Justice Collaborators in Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 take the form of physical and psychological protection, legal protection, special treatment, and rewards.</em></p><p><em>Keywords: Legal Protection, Justice Collaborator, Corruption</em></p>
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERKAIT PENETAPAN PIDANA DENDA DI BAWAH KETENTUAN PIDANA MINIMUM DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA NAKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN HAKIM NOMOR 212/PID.SUS/2019/PN. SGI)
Authors: Wibawa Khairunnisa Salsabila 
Published: May 2023

<p><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong><em>: Tujuan dari penelitian ini ialah untuk mengetahui kesesuaian pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi pidana denda dalam Putusan Hakim Nomor 212/Pid.Sus/2019/PN. SGI dengan ketentuan dalam Pasal 183 juncto Pasal 193 ayat (1) KUHAP dan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian doktrinal dan normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan yang dikaji menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus. Sumber bahan hukum didapat dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan dan dianalisis menggunakan pola pikir deduktif premis mayor dan premis minor. Dari kedua premis tersebut dapat ditarik kesimpulan dari permasalahan yang dikaji. Berdasar pada hasil penilitian ini dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi pidana denda dalam Putusan Hakim Nomor 212/Pid.Sus/2019/PN. SGI telah sesuai ketentuan dalam Pasal 183 juncto Pasal 193 ayat (1) KUHAP dan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika.</em></p><p><em>Kata Kunci : Pertimbangan Hakim, Pidana Denda, Tindak Pidana Narkotika</em></p><p><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong><em>: The purpose of this study is to determine the suitability of judges' judgment in imposing criminal sanctions for fines in Judge's Decision Number 212 / Pid.Sus / 2019 / PN. SGI with the provisions in Article 183 juncto Article 193 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. This research is a prescriptive and applied doctrinal and normative research which is examined using a case study. Sources of legal materials are obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. Sources of legal materials are obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. Data collection techniques using the study of literature and analyzed using the deductive mindset of the major premise and minor premise. From these two premises, conclusions can be drawn from the problems studied. Based on the results of this research, it can be concluded that the Judge's consideration in imposing criminal sanctions is a fine in Judge's Decree Number 212 / Pid.Sus / 2019 / PN. SGI has complied with the provisions in Article 183 juncto with Article 193 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.</em></p><p><em>Keyword: Judges Consideration, Criminal Fines, Narcotics Crime</em></p>