Enlarged cavum septum pellucidum as a neuroimaging signature of head impact exposure
Authors: Kamps Suzie , Hempel Hugo L , van Amerongen Suzan , de Bruin Hannah , van der Linden Fleur H C , Venkatraghavan Vikram , van der Flier Wiesje M , Pijnenburg Yolande A L , Barkhof Frederik , Scheltens Philip , Ossenkoppele Rik , Vijverberg Everard G B 
Published: February 2025

Abstract
Cavum Septum Pellucidum [CSP] is commonly observed upon neuroimaging examination in individuals exposed to repetitive head impacts [RHI] and post-mortem in cases with chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Consequently, CSP has been proposed as a potential biomarker for RHI-related neurodegeneration, yet prevalence estimates of CSP across other neurodegenerative diseases and its clinical implications are largely unknown. We assessed CSP prevalence and clinical correlates in individuals with RHI exposure, a history of Traumatic Brain Injury [TBI], a neurodegenerative disease (i.e. Alzheimer’s Disease or frontotemporal dementia) and normal cognition.
The primary group-of-interest, i.e., individuals exposed to RHI in contact sports or military service (N=65; mean exposure 21.58 years), was compared against age- and sex-matched participants with TBI (N=57; number of TBIs range: 1-5) and non-exposed participants of the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (Alzheimer’s Disease, N=30; Frontotemporal Dementia, N=24; Normal Cognition, N=27). Structural 3D brain MRI scans were visually rated for CSP grade (ranging 0-4) by two raters blinded to clinical information. A CSP of at least grade 2 was considered enlarged/abnormal. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with Cohens’ weighted Kappa (κ). We investigated whether prevalence of enlarged CSP differed between groups and assessed associations with neuropsychological outcomes (verbal memory, processing speed, mental flexibility, semantic fluency), neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory), ventricular enlargement as measured with Evan’s index, and MRI volumes of composite regions (limbic, temporal-meta regions and whole brain).
Inter-rater reliability was substantial (κ=0.734 [95% CI=0.67-0.80]). An enlarged CSP was more often observed in the RHI group (44.6%) compared to individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (13.3%, OR=5.24 [1.79-19.26]), frontotemporal dementia (16.7%, OR=4.03 [1.35-15.02] and normal cognition (18.5%, OR=3.54 [1.27-11.62]), all pFDR&lt;.05, but not compared to the TBI group (29.8%, OR=1.90 [0.90-4.06], pFDR=.094). In those with RHI, enlarged CSP was associated with lower outcomes on verbal memory learning (η²=.09, pFDR=.023) and recall (η²=.08, pFDR=.030). For TBI, enlarged CSP was associated with lower performance on verbal memory learning, however this lost significance after multiple comparison correction (η²=.014, pFDR =0.09). Enlarged CSP was not associated with the composite MRI volumes, ventricular enlargement, or neuropsychiatric symptoms.
In summary, enlarged CSP was more prevalent in RHI-exposed individuals compared to individuals with a neurodegenerative disease or normal cognition, but not compared to TBI, and was associated with lower verbal memory performance in the RHI group. Our study highlights enlarged CSP as a potential consequence of long-term head impact exposure, and to a lesser extent of TBI, rather than a general consequence of neurodegeneration.