Whole-brain annotation and multi-connectome cell typing quantifies circuit stereotypy inDrosophila
Authors: Schlegel Philipp , Yin Yijie , Bates Alexander S. , Dorkenwald Sven , Eichler Katharina , Brooks Paul , Han Daniel S. , Gkantia Marina , dos Santos Marcia , Munnelly Eva J. , Badalamente Griffin , Capdevila Laia Serratosa , Sane Varun A. , Pleijzier Markus W. , Tamimi Imaan F.M. , Dunne Christopher R. , Salgarella Irene , Javier Alexandre , Fang Siqi , Perlman Eric , Kazimiers Tom , Jagannathan Sridhar R. , Matsliah Arie , Sterling Amy R. , Yu Szi-chieh , McKellar Claire E. ,   FlyWire Consortium, Costa Marta , Seung H. Sebastian , Murthy Mala , Hartenstein Volker , Bock Davi D. , Jefferis Gregory S.X.E. 
Published: June 2023

AbstractThe fruit flyDrosophila melanogastercombines surprisingly sophisticated behaviour with a highly tractable nervous system. A large part of the fly’s success as a model organism in modern neuroscience stems from the concentration of collaboratively generated molecular genetic and digital resources. As presented in our FlyWire companion paper1, this now includes the first full brain connectome of an adult animal. Here we report the systematic and hierarchical annotation of this ∼130,000-neuron connectome including neuronal classes, cell types and developmental units (hemilineages). This enables any researcher to navigate this huge dataset and find systems and neurons of interest, linked to the literature through the Virtual Fly Brain database2. Crucially, this resource includes 4,552 cell types. 3,094 are rigorous consensus validations of cell types previously proposed in the “hemibrain” connectome3. In addition, we propose 1,458 new cell types, arising mostly from the fact that the FlyWire connectome spans the whole brain, whereas the hemibrain derives from a subvolume. Comparison of FlyWire and the hemibrain showed that cell type counts and strong connections were largely stable, but connection weights were surprisingly variable within and across animals. Further analysis defined simple heuristics for connectome interpretation: connections stronger than 10 unitary synapses or providing >1% of the input to a target cell are highly conserved. Some cell types showed increased variability across connectomes: the most common cell type in the mushroom body, required for learning and memory, is almost twice as numerous in FlyWire as the hemibrain. We find evidence for functional homeostasis through adjustments of the absolute amount of excitatory input while maintaining the excitation-inhibition ratio. Finally, and surprisingly, about one third of the cell types proposed in the hemibrain connectome could not yet be reliably identified in the FlyWire connectome. We therefore suggest that cell types should be defined to be robust to inter-individual variation, namely as groups of cells that are quantitatively more similar to cells in a different brain than to any other cell in the same brain. Joint analysis of the FlyWire and hemibrain connectomes demonstrates the viability and utility of this new definition. Our work defines a consensus cell type atlas for the fly brain and provides both an intellectual framework and open source toolchain for brain-scale comparative connectomics.