ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGABULKAN KASASI TERDAKWA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2959/K/PID.SUS/2022)
Authors: Prabaswara Yaying , Santoso Bambang 
Published: July 2023

<p><em><span class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*195.53px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*496.87px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.904695);" dir="ltr"><span id="page3R_mcid19" class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*118.94px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*521.23px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.866886);" dir="ltr">This study analyzes</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*201.77px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*521.23px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.908584);" dir="ltr">the criminal procedural law related to the consideration of the Supreme Court </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*535.27px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.930784);" dir="ltr">which granted Cassation guilty in the Narcotics case in accordance with Article 253 paragraph (1) of the </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*549.31px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.940188);" dir="ltr">Criminal Procedure Code and the consideration of the Supreme Court which</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*405.19px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*549.31px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.945723);" dir="ltr">annulled the</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*460.42px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*549.31px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.883419);" dir="ltr">Judex Factie </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*563.38px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.92854);" dir="ltr">decision and tried himself according to Article 256 jo 255 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Supreme </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*577.42px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.899529);" dir="ltr">Court set an acquittal in this case because there were legal clues and facts that showed the Defendant was </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*591.46px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.881672);" dir="ltr">innocent. The resea</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*162.74px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*591.46px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.902633);" dir="ltr">rch method used is normative legal research which is both perscriptive and applied with </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*605.50px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.890256);" dir="ltr">case studies. The way to collect legal materials is by studying the literature and legal materials used, namely </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*619.54px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.945203);" dir="ltr">primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the resu</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*325.99px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*619.54px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.95012);" dir="ltr">lts of research and discussion to answer the </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*633.58px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.895665);" dir="ltr">problem, it can be concluded that the reasons for cassation submitted by the Defendant were in accordance</span></span></span></span></em></p><p><em><span class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*195.53px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*496.87px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.904695);" dir="ltr"><span id="page3R_mcid19" class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*647.62px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.896526);" dir="ltr">with Article 253 paragraph (1) letter a of the Criminal Procedure Code because in the reasons for cassati</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*497.86px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*647.62px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.912081);" dir="ltr">on, </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*661.66px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.936537);" dir="ltr">the</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*102.50px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*661.66px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.894354);" dir="ltr">Judex Factie</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*157.46px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*661.66px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.983675);" dir="ltr">decision had misapplied the law, ignoring facts and instructions indicating that the </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*675.70px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.931645);" dir="ltr">Defendant not guilty. The Supreme Court's considerations in granting the Defendant's cassation were in </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*689.74px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.913633);" dir="ltr">accordance with Article 256 jo 255 of the Crimi</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*273.05px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*689.74px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.901163);" dir="ltr">nal Procedure Code granted the cassation and annulled the </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*703.78px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.866488);" dir="ltr">Judex Factie</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*136.94px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*703.78px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.93167);" dir="ltr">decision and the trial itself declared the convict not legally and convincingly proven guilty of </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*717.84px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.900986);" dir="ltr">committing a crime of Narcotics. The Supreme Court has restored the Defendant's rights i</span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*440.71px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*717.84px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.935119);" dir="ltr">n terms of ability, </span><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*731.76px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-factor)*9.96px); font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.929187);" dir="ltr">position and dignity.</span></span></span></span></em></p><p><em><span class="Y2IQFc" lang="en"><strong>Keywords:</strong> <a href="/verstek/article/view/71539">defendant's cassation; Narcotics; Consideration of the Supreme Court;</a></span></em></p>