Disparities in Hemoglobin A1c Levels in the First Year After Diagnosis Among Youths With Type 1 Diabetes Offered Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Authors: Addala Ananta , Ding Victoria , Zaharieva Dessi P. , Bishop Franziska K. , Adams Alyce S. , King Abby C. , Johari Ramesh , Scheinker David , Hood Korey K. , Desai Manisha , Maahs David M. , Prahalad Priya ,   Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T) Study Group, Arrizon-Ruiz Nora , Pang Erica , Cortes Ana , Bonilla-Ospina Andrea , Tam Rachel , Balistreri Ilenia , Loyola Alondra , Alramahi Noor , Frank Eliana , Leverenz Jeannine , Sagan Piper , Martinex-Singh Anjoli , Chmielewski Annette , Conrad Barry , Clash Kim , Senaldi Julie , Tanenbaum Molly , Senanayake Ransalu , Pei Ryan , Osmanlliu Esli , Chang Annie , Dupenloup Paul , Kurtzig Jamie , Ritter Victor , Shaw Blake , Fox Emily , Guestrin Carlos , Ferstad Johannes , Langlios Juan , Wang Alex , Futoma Josesph , Levine Matthew , Singhal Arpita , Jeong Yujin , McKay Matthew , Pageler Nataglie , Ghuman Simrat , Wiedmann Michelle , Brown Connor , Watkins Bredan , Loving Glenn , Naranjo Diana 
Published: April 2023

ImportanceContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is associated with improvements in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in youths with type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, youths from minoritized racial and ethnic groups and those with public insurance face greater barriers to CGM access. Early initiation of and access to CGM may reduce disparities in CGM uptake and improve diabetes outcomes.ObjectiveTo determine whether HbA1c decreases differed by ethnicity and insurance status among a cohort of youths newly diagnosed with T1D and provided CGM.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used data from the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T) study, a clinical research program that aims to initiate CGM within 1 month of T1D diagnosis. All youths with new-onset T1D diagnosed between July 25, 2018, and June 15, 2020, at Stanford Children’s Hospital, a single-site, freestanding children’s hospital in California, were approached to enroll in the Pilot-4T study and were followed for 12 months. Data analysis was performed and completed on June 3, 2022.ExposuresAll eligible participants were offered CGM within 1 month of diabetes diagnosis.Main Outcomes and MeasuresTo assess HbA1c change over the study period, analyses were stratified by ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic) or insurance status (public vs private) to compare the Pilot-4T cohort with a historical cohort of 272 youths diagnosed with T1D between June 1, 2014, and December 28, 2016.ResultsThe Pilot-4T cohort comprised 135 youths, with a median age of 9.7 years (IQR, 6.8-12.7 years) at diagnosis. There were 71 boys (52.6%) and 64 girls (47.4%). Based on self-report, participants’ race was categorized as Asian or Pacific Islander (19 [14.1%]), White (62 [45.9%]), or other race (39 [28.9%]); race was missing or not reported for 15 participants (11.1%). Participants also self-reported their ethnicity as Hispanic (29 [21.5%]) or non-Hispanic (92 [68.1%]). A total of 104 participants (77.0%) had private insurance and 31 (23.0%) had public insurance. Compared with the historical cohort, similar reductions in HbA1c at 6, 9, and 12 months postdiagnosis were observed for Hispanic individuals (estimated difference, −0.26% [95% CI, −1.05% to 0.43%], −0.60% [−1.46% to 0.21%], and −0.15% [−1.48% to 0.80%]) and non-Hispanic individuals (estimated difference, −0.27% [95% CI, −0.62% to 0.10%], −0.50% [−0.81% to −0.11%], and −0.47% [−0.91% to 0.06%]) in the Pilot-4T cohort. Similar reductions in HbA1c at 6, 9, and 12 months postdiagnosis were also observed for publicly insured individuals (estimated difference, −0.52% [95% CI, −1.22% to 0.15%], −0.38% [−1.26% to 0.33%], and −0.57% [−2.08% to 0.74%]) and privately insured individuals (estimated difference, −0.34% [95% CI, −0.67% to 0.03%], −0.57% [−0.85% to −0.26%], and −0.43% [−0.85% to 0.01%]) in the Pilot-4T cohort. Hispanic youths in the Pilot-4T cohort had higher HbA1c at 6, 9, and 12 months postdiagnosis than non-Hispanic youths (estimated difference, 0.28% [95% CI, −0.46% to 0.86%], 0.63% [0.02% to 1.20%], and 1.39% [0.37% to 1.96%]), as did publicly insured youths compared with privately insured youths (estimated difference, 0.39% [95% CI, −0.23% to 0.99%], 0.95% [0.28% to 1.45%], and 1.16% [−0.09% to 2.13%]).Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this cohort study suggest that CGM initiation soon after diagnosis is associated with similar improvements in HbA1c for Hispanic and non-Hispanic youths as well as for publicly and privately insured youths. These results further suggest that equitable access to CGM soon after T1D diagnosis may be a first step to improve HbA1c for all youths but is unlikely to eliminate disparities entirely.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04336969