Involvement of Indigenous young people in the design and evaluation of digital mental health interventions: A scoping review of best practice principles
Authors: Povey Josie , Raphiphatthana Buaphrao , Torok Michelle , Nagel Tricia , Mills Patj Patj Janama Robert , Sells Joshua Russell Howard , Shand Fiona , Sweet Michelle , Lowell Anne , Dingwall Kylie M 
Published: January 2023

Abstract
Background

Indigenous young people worldwide possess unique protective factors that support wellbeing. However, they experience mental illness at higher rates than their non-indigenous counterparts. Digital mental health (dMH) resources can increase access to structured, timely, and culturally tailored mental health interventions by reducing structural and attitudinal barriers to accessing treatment. The involvement of Indigenous young people in dMH resource development is recommended, however, no guidelines exist on how this can best be facilitated.

Methods

A scoping review examining processes to involve Indigenous young people in developing or evaluating dMH interventions was conducted. Studies reported between 1990–2022 involving Indigenous young people aged 12–24 years, originating from Canada, the United States of America, New Zealand, and Australia, in the development or evaluation of dMH interventions were eligible for inclusion. Following a three-step search process, four electronic databases were searched. Data were extracted, synthesised, and described under three categories: dMH intervention attributes, study design, and alignment with research best practice. Best practice recommendations for Indigenous research and participatory design were identified and synthesised. Included studies were assessed against these recommendations. Consultation with two Senior Indigenous Research Officers ensured Indigenous worldviews informed analysis.

Results

Nineteen studies describing ten dMH interventions met inclusion criteria. Studies included formative, design, pilot, and efficacy studies. Overall, most included studies demonstrated a high degree of Indigenous governance, capacity building, and community benefit. All studies adapted their research processes to ensure that local community protocols were followed and most aligned these within an Indigenous research paradigm. Formal agreements regarding existing and created intellectual property and implementation evaluations were rare. Outcomes were the primary focus of reporting, with limited detailed descriptions of governance and decision-making processes or strategies for managing predictable tensions between co-design stakeholders.

Conclusions

This study identified best practice recommendations in participatory design with Indigenous young people and evaluated the current literature against these criteria. Common gaps were evident in the reporting of study processes. Consistent, in-depth reporting is needed to allow assessment of best practice approaches for this hard-to-reach population. An emergent best practice model, informed by our findings, for guiding the involvement of Indigenous young people in the design and evaluation of dMH tools is presented.

Systematic review registration: available via osf.io/2nkc6