A 4-Week Mobile App–Based Telerehabilitation Program vs Conventional In-Person Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Sarcopenia: Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors: Zhang Lu , Ge Ying , Zhao Wowa , Shu Xuan , Kang Lin , Wang Qiumei , Liu Ying 
Published: January 2025

Background
Sarcopenia is closely associated with a poor quality of life and mortality, and its prevention and treatment represent a critical area of research. Resistance training is an effective treatment for older adults with sarcopenia. However, they often face challenges when receiving traditional rehabilitation treatments at hospitals.

Objective
We aimed to compare the effects of a digital rehabilitation program with those of traditional therapist-supervised rehabilitation training on older adults with sarcopenia.

Methods
In total, 58 older adults with sarcopenia were recruited offline and randomized (1:1) into 2 groups: the telerehabilitation group (TRG, n=29, 50%) and the in-person rehabilitation group (IRG, n=29, 50%). Both groups underwent 4-week resistance training targeting 6 major muscle groups. The TRG received exercise guidance via a mobile app, while the IRG received in-person training from a therapist. Offline assessments of body composition, grip strength, and balance using the 30-Second Arm Curl Test (30SACT), 30-Second Sitting-to-Rising Test (30SSRT), quadriceps femoris extension peak torque (EPT) and extension total power (ETP), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up-and-Go Test (TUGT), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale, were conducted before and after the intervention.

Results
Of the 58 patients, 51 (88%; TRG: n=24, 47%; IRG: n=27, 53%) completed the trial. After 4 weeks of intervention, the mean grip strength increased from 18.10 (SD 5.56) to 19.92 (SD 5.90) kg in the TRG (P=.02) and from 18.59 (SD 5.95) to 19.59 (SD 6.11) kg in the IRG (P=.01). The 30SACT and 30SSRT scores increased from 12.48 (SD 2.68) to 14.94 (SD 3.68) times (P=.01) and from 15.16 (SD 7.23) to 16.58 (SD 8.42) times (P=.045), respectively, in the TRG and from 12.25 (SD 4.19) to 14.68 (SD 4.36) times (P=.003) and from 14.31 (SD 4.04) to 16.25 (SD 4.91) times (P=.01), respectively, in the IRG. The quadriceps femoris EPT increased from 26.19 (SD 10.26) to 35.00 (SD 13.74) Nm (P=.004) in the TRG and from 26.95 (SD 11.81) to 32.74 (SD 12.33) Nm (P=.003) in the IRG. The BBS scores significantly improved in both groups (P<.001), with the mean TRG score increasing by 3.19 (SD 2.86) points and the mean IRG score by 3.06 (SD 2.44) points. Neither group exhibited significant within-group changes on the TUGT or the 6MWT. Both groups reported significant improvements in the IADL (TRG: P=.04; IRG: P=.02). Between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in changes in all indicators.

Conclusions
A 4-week remote resistance training program is effective in improving strength, balance, and the IADL in older adults with sarcopenia, with effects comparable to rehabilitation supervised by a physical therapist. Telerehabilitation may be a convenient and effective alternative for older adults with sarcopenia who have limited access to rehabilitation resources.

Trial Registration
ChiCTR 2300071648; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=196313