Poster 396: Barriers and facilitators to national licensure for US medical professionals: what Covid has taught us and using sports medicine as a launch pad
Authors: Saxena Amol 
Published: August 2023

Objectives: GLOBAL AIM: Increase license portability across state lines for all US medical professionals. SPECIFIC AIM: Increase the ability to provide medical care nationwide for all US sports medicine physicians (who have a CAQ for their specialty) across state lines and set a precedent for other licensed healthcare professionals by 2026. The aim is to extend the portability of medical licensure across state lines to all sports medicine professionals (not just those who care for professional teams) and use this as a precedent eventually for all types of healthcare workers. Currently sports medicine physicians for professional teams are allowed to provide care across state lines which is legislated by “The Sports Medicine Licensure Clarity Act” (SMLCA) in 2018. As July 22, 2022, licensure is allowed for at least telemedicine across state lines for 23 states and has been extended by the HHS as part of Covid healthcare measures that were implemented in 2020. Methods: Review of current policies, barriers and facilitators has been performed using various search strategies and qualitative techniques. Current state and national laws were reviewed and will be presented. California has a large population where there is no reciprocity for other medical professionals, therefore meetings have been set with the Business Professions Committee with a plan to submit a bill sponsored by a state assemblyman to expand access to licensure across state lines in 2023. Results: One barrier is the loss of states’ autonomy as well as the individual authority and stature a medical professional may gain from being on a licensing board. Most US states have no reciprocity and not all have the licensure process standardized. Some states have a non-transparent process and others do not wish to participate in regional compacts such as California. Even more concerning, some states are found to more-likely censure doctors of color and perform sham peer review. This is an example of bias in medical credentialing that can impede diversity and inclusion efforts. The European Union allows medical licensure across national borders. Doctors need to pass a language proficiency test for the country they wish to practice in, regardless of which European country they received their medical training. Given that English is the only language of instruction in the US, proficiency can be easily evaluated. Language should not be a barrier to license portability, especially if one is already licensed in one US state even for foreign medical graduates. The Covid pandemic showed licensure is obtainable in a relatively rapid fashion across state lines. In addition, federal health care facilities such as the VA system already allow practitioners licensed in one state to practice in another without a license to that specific state. Portability across state-lines aids practitioners who practice on state borders in both rural and urban areas, such as the NH and VT border(rural), and NY and DC metro areas (urban) as well as telehealth for both an immobile and mobile populations, enhancing equitable healthcare access. This also removes financial barriers of cost for licensing fees for practitioners and staff resources to process licenses. Conclusions: The US has one of the most restrictive medical licensures of all developed countries, making mobilization of healthcare workers extremely difficult. Removing this barrier will be beneficial when medical staff is needed across state lines for pandemics, natural disasters, intake of refugees/immigrants, and global sporting events held in the US such as the World Cup in 2026, and Olympics in 2028. This could also extend access for the general US population to healthcare providers via “tele-medicine” (virtual/video visits), to essentially all populations (socio-economically disadvantaged, immigrants, those with mobility and transportation barriers, rural locations etc). This will ensure higher quality care, better follow-up along with more timely and equitable healthcare, which are all currently limited by restricting portability and requiring licenses for each individual state.