First developments towards producing inductive magnetic sensors using state-of-the-art photolithography techniques
Authors: Testa Duccio , Cemes Marcus , Douhane Ambrine , Tanguy Florian 
Published: June 2023

Abstract
Inductive magnetic sensors are needed for tokamak operation to provide the
low-frequency (LF) measurements leading to the equilibrium reconstruction and to monitor the
higher frequency (HF) instabilities; the HF magnetic sensors are often also used as a back-up to
the LF ones. For the HF inductive magnetic sensors (fluctuation measurements), we need to minimize
the self-inductance (L
SELF) provided that the effective area (N A
EFF)
remains sufficiently large, typically requiring L
SELF < 100 μH and
N A
EFF ∼ 0.01 m2. For the LF inductive magnetic sensors (equilibrium
reconstruction), the only physics-based design criteria are that of maximizing N A
EFF > 0.10 m2, essentially independently of the resulting L
SELF. Due to these
rather different measurement specifications, it is quite the common case that different sets of LF
and HF inductive magnetic sensors are used, which significantly complicates the R&D activities
and the ensuing manufacturing processes.
Starting in 2007, our group at the Swiss Plasma Centre at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) has originally developed the Low-Temperature Co-fired Ceramic (LTCC) technology for producing inductive magnetic sensors, this technology being exceptionally suitable for operating temperatures up to ∼1'000C in very harsh environmental conditions. The similarly named High-Temperature (HTCC) technology uses the same processes but different materials, and it is then suitable for operating temperatures up to ∼1'600C. ITER will have about ∼250 such LTCC sensors, of EPFL design and prototyped at the EPFL, but manufactured by a commercial entity to technical specifications lower than those achieved at the EPFL in terms of track width, track separation and overall manufacturing yields.
While state-of-the-art in 2007, the LTCC and HTCC technologies are now at least 20 years old and new processes have been developed for commercial applications, essentially based on different photolithography (PL) techniques. Recent, and already industrialized, advances in microfabrication using PL techniques offer the possibility to create more compact and optimized designs starting from current industrial standards, therefore extremely facilitating the very costly lab-to-fab step of production, namely all the activities that lead from the ideas in the lab to the actual (industrialized) fabrication. Our goal is to continue to push the frontier of magnetic sensors, bring a commercially viable design that can be used in tomorrow's scientific projects, such as nuclear fusion and astronomy/astrophysics (for instance, in the new generations of miniaturized satellites).
The main advantage of the PL techniques is that a much smaller track width (dd1) can be achieved, down from the routine dd1 = 100 μm of the EPFL LTCC sensors (for ITER: dd1 = 400 μm) to dd1 < 10 μm. A smaller dd1 allows to pack more planar winding loops (m) enclosing a larger area over a smaller geometrical surface. Therefore, PL coils can have a lower self-inductance L
SELF ∝ m2 while having the same effective area N A
EFF ∝ m compared to coils manufactured by other more common technologies. Therefore, with PL techniques a similar design could be used for both HF and LF applications, the difference simply being the number of stacked-up layers (n) used to make-up the entire sensor.
In this paper we will present the first developments towards the production of inductive magnetic sensors using PL techniques. Whilst providing the possibility of designing better performing and more compact sensors, the introduction of PL techniques in the manufacturing processes for inductive magnetic sensors has uncovered new limitations and obstacles, such as the required vertical track thickness that is poorly suited for the existing deposition techniques, the need for stacking up multiple wafers and the connection between the sensor and the in-vessel cabling.