Characterization of the anticonvulsant profile and enantioselective pharmacokinetics of the chiral valproylamide propylisopropyl acetamide in rodents
Authors: Isoherranen Nina , Yagen Boris , Woodhead José H , Spiegelstein Ofer , Blotnik Simcha , Wilcox Karen S , Finnell Richard H , Bennett Gregory D , White H Steve , Bialer Meir 
Published: February 2003

Propylisopropyl acetamide (PID) is a new chiral amide derivative of valproic acid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anticonvulsant activity of PID in rodent models of partial, secondarily generalized and sound‐induced generalized seizures which focus on different methods of seizure induction, both acute stimuli, and following short‐term plastic changes as a result of kindling, and to assess enantioselectivity and enantiomer–enantiomer interactions in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of racemic PID and its pure enantiomers in rodents.
Anticonvulsant activity of (S)‐PID, (R)‐PID and racemic PID was evaluated in the 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model in mice, in the hippocampal kindled rat, and in the Frings audiogenic seizure susceptible mouse. The pharmacokinetics of (S)‐PID and (R)‐PID was studied in mice and rats.
In mice (S)‐PID, (R)‐PID and racemic PID were effective in preventing the 6 Hz seizures with (R)‐PID being significantly (P<0.05) more potent (ED50 values 11 mg kg−1, 46 mg kg−1 and 57 mg kg−1 at stimulation intensities of 22, 32 and 44 mA, respectively) than (S)‐PID (ED50 values 20 mg kg−1, 73 mg kg−1 and 81 mg kg−1 at stimulation intensities of 22, 32 and 44 mA, respectively). (S)‐PID, (R)‐PID and racemic PID also blocked generalized seizures in the Frings mice (ED50 values 16 mg kg−1, 20 mg kg−1 and 19 mg kg−1 respectively).
In the hippocampal kindled rat a dose of 40 mg kg−1 of (R)‐ and (S)‐PID prevented the secondarily generalized seizure, whereas racemic PID also blocked the expression of partial seizures following an i.p. dose of 40 mg kg−1. Racemic PID also significantly increased the seizure threshold in this model.
Mechanistic studies showed that PID did not affect voltage‐sensitive sodium channels or kainate‐, GABA‐ or NMDA‐ evoked currents.
The pharmacokinetics of PID was enantioselective following i.p. administration of individual enantiomers to mice, with (R)‐PID having lower clearance and longer half‐life than (S)‐PID. In rats and mice, no enantioselectivity in the pharmacokinetics of PID was observed following administration of the racemate, which may be due to enantiomer–enantiomer interaction.
This study demonstrated that PID has both enantioselective pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The better anticonvulsant potency of (R)‐PID in comparison to (S)‐PID may be due to its more favorable pharmacokinetic profile. The enhanced efficacy of the racemate over the individual enantiomers in the kindled rat may be explained by a pharmacokinetic enantiomer–enantiomer interaction in rats. This study also showed the importance of studying the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chiral drugs following administration of the individual enantiomers as well as the racemic mixture.

British Journal of Pharmacology (2003) 138, 602–613. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705076