Association Between Restricted Abortion Access and Child Entries Into the Foster Care System
Authors: Adkins Savannah , Talmor Noa , White Molly H. , Dutton Caryn , O’Donoghue Ashley L. 
Published: November 2023

ImportanceThe 2022 US Supreme Court decisionDobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organizationoverturned federal protections to abortion care, allowing many states to severely restrict or ban access to abortion. Given the implications of theDobbsruling, there is a need to understand the full consequences of restricted abortion access. Before 2022, many states restricted access to safe and legal abortions through Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) laws, which provide a historical mode for estimating the consequences of abortion restrictions.ObjectiveTo use TRAP law enactment as a natural experiment to quantify the association between restricted abortion access and foster care entries.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this cohort study, data on the enactment of TRAP laws and case-level data on foster care entries were used to estimate the association between restricted abortion access and foster care entries in each of the 50 US states and the District of Columbia. The sample included children conceived between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2011, who were placed into foster care at any point between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2020. Data analysis was performed from January 2023 to July 2023.ExposuresRestricted abortion access due to state-level TRAP laws during pregnancy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome was the number of children entering foster care in each state, measured by year of child conception. The analysis was performed using a generalized difference-in-differences design, comparing entries into foster care in states with TRAP laws to states without TRAP laws, before and after their implementation.ResultsThis study included 4 179 701 children who were placed into foster care during the study period, with 11 016 561 entries. More than half of the children were male (51.4%), and the mean (SD) age was 7.4 (5.2) years. There was an 11% increase in foster care placement after abortion access was restricted in states with TRAP laws, relative to states without TRAP laws (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.01-1.23]). These laws had significant consequences for Black children (IRR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.05-1.28]) and racial and ethnic minority children (IRR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.02-1.30]). The increase in entries due to TRAP laws was particularly attributable to housing inadequacy (IRR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.11-1.32]).Conclusions and RelevanceRestricted abortion access can have numerous consequences, and these findings reveal a heightened strain on the US foster care system, particularly affecting marginalized racial and ethnic communities and financially vulnerable families. These placements have been shown to have lifelong consequences for children and substantial costs for both states and the federal government. To further examine the widespread implications of the overturning ofRoe v Wade, future studies should forecast the expected increase in foster care entries and estimate the expenditure needed to support these children.