bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A prospective multicenter phase II trial of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer in JAPAN: ENSEMBLE-1 study.
Authors: Kagawa Yoshinori , Watanabe Jun , Ando Koji , Uemura Mamoru , Inoue Akira , Oba Koji , Takemasa Ichiro , Oki Eiji 
Published: January 2024

123 Background: The short- and long-term prognosis of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is elucidated in the world. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of TNT for patients with LARC in Japan. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II trial was conducted at five institutions. The key eligibility criteria were age ≥20 years, LARC within 12 cm from the anal verge, and cT3-4N0M0 or TanyN+M0 at the time of diagnosis that enabled curative resection. Preoperative short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) 5 Gy × 5 days (total 25 Gy) + CAPOX (6 courses) followed by total mesorectum excision (TME) was the treatment protocol. Non-operative management (NOM) was allowed if clinical complete response (cCR) was obtained in the preoperative evaluation. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. With a pCR rate threshold of 5%, an expected value of 28%, a one-sided significance level of 5%, and a power of at least 80%, the sample size required by the exact binomial distribution method would be ≥19 patients. Considering a few dropouts, ineligible cases, and patients in which resection was not performed, the target sample size was set to 27 patients. Results: Thirty patients (male, n=26; female, n=4; median age, 62.5 [44-74] years; cT [T2, n=1; T3, n=25; T4, n=4]; cN [N0, n=13; N1, n=13; N2, n=4]) were enrolled. The final analysis included 30 patients in total. The completion rates were 100% for SCRT and 83% for CAPOX. TME and NOM were performed in 20 and seven patients, respectively. pCR was observed in six patients (30% [95% CI 14.0%–50.8%]). The primary endpoint was met. pCR+cCR was observed in 13 (43.3%) patients at TME or restaging. There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade ≥3 (CTCAE ver. 5.0) adverse events (≥20%), including diarrhea (23.3%) and neutropenia (23.3%). The median follow-up period was 21.8 (10.9-29.6) months. Recurrences in three patients (10.0%) were observed. In NOM, regrowth (28.6%) in two patients occurred, of which one patient was performed TME and one patient is on chemotherapy. Conclusions: ENSEMBLE-1 demonstrated satisfactory pCR and cCR, and well-tolerated safety of TNT for patients with LARC in JAPAN. Further long-term prognosis observation is required. A phase III trial, ENSEMBLE (NCT05646511/jRCTs031220342) is currently ongoing in JAPAN. Clinical trial information: jRCT s051200113 .
Preliminary efficacy and safety of fruquintinib as maintenance therapy after first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): A multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial (the FRONT study).
Authors: Xu Xiaojing , Yu Yiyi , Liu Qing , Wang Yan , Cui Yuehong , Li Wei , Li Qian , Feng Yi , Liang Li , Yu Shan , Lv Minzhi , Liu Tianshu 
Published: January 2024

126 Background: Maintenance therapy and discontinuation of treatment are options to mCRC patients who response to first-line treatment. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib as maintenance therapy after first-line treatment for mCRC. Methods: This is an ongoing, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Patients (pts) with unresectable right-sided mCRC or RAS-mutant left-sided mCRC, who hadn’t suffer disease progression after first-line standard treatment (chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab) for four to six months, were eligible. According to the protocol, 110 patients would be randomly assigned (2:1) to fruquintinib (FR) group (4mg once daily for 21 days, followed by 7 days off in 28 day cycles) or observation (OB) group via interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Up to Aug 22, 2023, 28 and 14 patients had been enrolled in FR group and OB group, of whom the median age was 61 (44 to 73) vs. 66.5 (36 to 81), including 20 (71%) vs. 10 (71%) males, respectively. 26 (93%) vs. 11 (79%) patients were RAS-mutant. In the full analysis set (FAS), the median PFS were 5.26 (95% CI: 3.71-19.12) months and 2.99 (95% CI: 1.91-4.63) months (HR=0.36; p=0.0158). 25 and 13 pts from two groups received at least one response evaluation after baseline, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) was 88.00% (22/25) vs. 53.85% (7/13) (OR=6.29, 95% CI: 1.31-36.7; p=0.0267). As to the per-protocol set (PPS), since 6 pts in FR group initiated with a lower dose (3mg), the number of patients was 22 vs. 14. The median PFS were 6.51 (95% CI: 3.88-19.12) months and 2.99 (95% CI: 1.91-4.63) months (HR=0.25; p=0.0061). The DCR was 89.47% (17/19) vs. 53.85% (7/13) (OR=7.29, 95% CI: 1.32-58.9; p=0.0331). The common AEs in FR group were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, rash, oral mucositis, and proteinuria, while AEs of grades≥3 were hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, oral mucositis, and proteinuria. Conclusions: Fruquintinib at a moderate dose level indicated better outcomes of PFS as a maintenance therapy after first-line therapy with acceptable toxicity for patients with mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04296019 .
Updated survival results of ALTER-C002: Anlotinib combined with CAPEOX as first-line treatment in RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.
Authors: Liu Yue , Ding Kefeng , Xiao Qian , He Jinjie , Hu Hanguang , Du Jinlin , Zhu Yuping , Chen Jiaqi , Liu Zhuo , Wang Jianping , Sun Lifeng , Xu Dong , Li Jun , Liao Xiujun , Wang Jianwei , Cai Yibo , Cai Cheng , Jin Zhekang , Yuan Ying 
Published: January 2024

131 Background: Anlotinib is an oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor, mainly targeting VEGFR 1-3, FGFR 1-4, PDGFR a/b and c-kit. Previous trial had demonstrated that anlotinib monotherapy was effective and safe in advanced colorectal cancer. ALTER-C002 trial is an open-label, single-arm, phase II study, aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus CAPEOX as first-line therapy in patients with RAS/ BRAF wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The progression-free survival has been reported, preliminary results demonstrated significant antitumor activity and manageable toxicity, here we reported the overall survival results at the data cutoff of May 29, 2023. Methods: RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable mCRC patients with no prior systemic treatment received anlotinib (12 mg p.o. qd, d1-d14, q3w), capecitabine (850 mg/m2 p.o., bid, d1-d14, q3w) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 i.v., d1, q3w) for 6 cycles followed by anlotinib and capecitabine as maintenance therapy until disease progression. Tumor response was assessed every 6 weeks according to RECIST v1.1 by investigator. The primary endpoint was ORR, and secondary endpoints included safety, DCR, DOR and PFS. Results: From Nov 2019 to February 2021, 30 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom, median age was 60y (range, 32-72y), 26 (86.7%) had left colon or rectal cancer, and 25 (83.3%) had liver metastases. In previous reports, ORR, DCR, and median PFS were 76.7%, 93.3%, and 11.3 months, respectively. At a Median follow-up of 31.7 months (95% CI, 27.8-35.6), the median OS was 29.7 months (95% CI, 21.2-38.2), the 24-month OS rate was 55.0% (95%CI, 35.4-70.9%) and the 30-month OS rate was 40.6% (95%CI:21.6-58.9%). Conclusions: Anlotinib combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine achieved considerable OS and showed potential efficacy as first-line therapy for mCRC with manageable toxicity profiles. Clinical trial information: NCT04080843 .
Real-world data of TAS-102 therapy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The experience of the University Hospital of Montreal (CHUM).
Authors: El Khoury Reem , Tehfe Jad , Ouellet Marie , Aubin Francine , Lougnarath Rasmy , Ayoub Jean-Pierre M. , Tehfe Mustapha 
Published: January 2024

137 Background: Colorectal cancer poses a substantial healthcare burden due to its elevated rates of diagnosis and mortality. Managing refractory metastatic cases remains a challenge in our practice due to the paucity of therapeutic options. Treatment with Trifluridine-Tipiracil (TAS-102) prolonged overall survival among patients (pts) with mCRC. This study investigates the efficacy of TAS-102 therapy in this patient population and explores various prognostic factors influencing clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 53 patients with refractory mCRC treated with at least 1 cycle of TAS-102 at CHUM between March 2018 and January 2023. Multivariate and univariate analyses were employed to evaluate the impact of age, number of prior treatments, presence of KRAS mutation, gender, tumor origin, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression analysis assessed prognostic factors. Results: The median age was 61 years (23-82), and 27 pts (50.9%) were females. Twenty-two pts (41.5%) had their primary tumor located in the left colon, 17 pts (32.1%) had right-sided tumors, and 14 pts (26.4%) with rectal tumors. 52% of pts received TAS-102 after 2 lines of therapy and 43% beyond third line. The performance status was: ECOG 0/1 in 46 pts (86.8%), and ECOG 2 in 7 pts (13.2%). In our refractory mCRC pts, median PFS was 3 months and median OS 7 months. Univariate analysis demonstrated no significant differences in PFS or OS based on patient sex, KRAS mutation status, tumor sidedness, or the number of prior treatments. In univariate and multivariate analysis ECOG 0/1 pts compared to ECOG 2 pts had a significant improvement in both PFS (HR = 0.33; p = 0.0511) and OS (HR = 0.21; p = 0.0086). Conclusions: In our real-world experience, clinical outcomes were comparable to the findings from the RECOURSE trial, suggesting improved PFS and OS with TAS-102 in heavily pre-treated mCRC patients. ECOG performance status remains a significant prognostic factor and underscores its importance in treatment decisions for this patient population.
Characterizing differential efficacy and phenotypic response to proteasome and survivin inhibitors in colorectal cancers using a high throughput organoid assay.
Authors: Zuaiter Dana , Ahirwar Parmanand , Pokal Aman G , Patel Zeelu H. , Charania Areesha A. , Crawford Chelsea L. , Sewell-Loftin Mary Kathryn , Tsung Allan , Kim Alex , Budhwani Karim I. 
Published: January 2024

153 Background: Conventional monolayer cell cultures and xenograft models, while useful and economical in early drug discovery, cannot predict clinical efficacy. Further, preclinical screening assays that rely on differential metabolic activity between separate control and treated wells are incapable of capturing phenotypic response and could overstate efficacy for cells with high rates of proliferation. Consequently, over 95% of anticancer agents that show efficacy in preclinical studies, fail in clinical trials. Recently, patient-derived organoid (PDO) models have been utilized in developing platforms to predict clinical efficacy of preclinical formulations. If successful, such predictive ex vivo technologies could revolutionize cancer treatment by reducing cost and time-to-market for new, more effective therapeutics. Objective: Characterize a novel bioprinted organoid tumor (BOT) high-throughput screening ex vivo platform for drug response prediction (DRP) with known proteosome and survivn inhibitors in colorectal cancer. Methods: Bioink for 3D printing BOTs was prepared with HT-29 cells, an established NCI-60 human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line with known sensitivity to proteosome and survivin inhibitors. Bioink was deposited layer-by-layer on multiple substrates, in various geometrical configurations, and cured in stages to allow cells and matrix to self-assemble with limited degrees of freedom. BOTs were screened 24h and 48h after printing with proteosome inhibitor Bortezomib and survivin inhibitor YM-155. BOTs were evaluated 48h and 72h after treatment using immunofluorescence live/dead assay. Morphological phenotypic changes resulting from treatment were also recorded. Results: Proteasome and survivin inhibitors have been reported to inhibit proliferation and induce cell death in colorectal cancer cells. A dose dependent response was observed for both agents in our novel BOT HTS thereby validating the platform. In addition, characteristic self-assembly of HT-29 cells was observed to be disrupted at effective doses and at certain concentrations below the effective dose. Traditional ATP assays are incapable of recording such phenotypic modulation. Further, a higher proliferation profile was observed in untreated BOTs suggesting that use of independent control wells in traditional assays could overstate efficacy of treatment. Conclusions: Functional high-throughput ex vivo DRP technologies have the potential to transform cancer treatment – from bench to bedside – along the drug discovery to market roadmap for much needed novel anticancer agents.
Real-world biomarker testing patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with later lines of therapy (LOT) in the United States (US) community oncology setting.
Authors: Katta Arvind , Barzi Afsaneh , Hocum Brian Thomas , Appukkutan Sreevalsa , Cosgrove David , Sruti Ila , Shi Junxin , Dai Wei , Patton Gregory A. , Babajanyan Svetlana , Bekaii-Saab Tanios S. 
Published: January 2024

163 Background: Testing for BRAF and KRAS/NRAS mutations, HER2 amplifications, and MSI/MMR status is a standard of care for all patients with mCRC. There are limited real-world (RW) data regarding biomarker testing patterns among robust patients who are candidates for multiple LOT. We evaluated biomarker testing patterns among patients treated in community oncology practices who initiated regorafenib (REGO) and/or trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI), predominantly in 3rd or later lines of therapy. Methods: A retrospective analysis utilizing electronic medical record data from The US Oncology Network examined adult patients with mCRC who initiated REGO and/or FTD/TPI between 09/01/2015 and 11/30/2022 with follow-up until 05/31/2023. The proportion of patients tested for various biomarkers was assessed. Results: A total of 2684 mCRC patients initiated REGO and/or FTD/TPI (including 895 pts receiving both) in any LOT during the study period. The mean age of patients at baseline was 62.9 years, of whom 54.9% were male, 1599 (59.6%) patients were White and 436 (16.2%) were underrepresented minorities (Black or Hispanic/Latino). Patients were most commonly tested for KRAS mutations (75.2%) and least commonly for HER2 amplifications (22.6%). Age, gender, and race/ethnicity characteristics were similar between treatment subgroups, with 29.6% of minority and 23.1% of white patients not undergoing KRAS testing. Types of biomarkers tested and proportion of patients tested are reported in the table below. Conclusions: About one quarter of patients who were sufficiently robust to receive aggressive therapy did not undergo testing for KRAS, the oldest standard of care biomarker in CRC. We observed disparities by race/ethnicity. We also observed a correlation between rates of testing and treatment intensity, with patients who received both REGO and FTD/TPI having a higher rate of testing than those who received only one of the treatments. Understanding the pitfalls in biomarker testing will help pave the way for appropriate and equitable access to cancer care. [Table: see text]
Preclinical analysis and clinical validation to identify biomarkers of regorafenib efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Authors: Suenaga Mitsukuni , Mashima Tetsuo , Kawata Naomi , Dan Shingo , Seimiya Hiroyuki , Yamaguchi Kensei 
Published: January 2024

171 Background: In the identification of biomarkers for anticancer drugs, the lack of objectivity in the selection of candidate factors makes it difficult to interpret the mechanism. We performed preclinical analysis and translational validation study to identify the candidate cytokines for regorafenib efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Methods: As a first preclinical process, we selected candidate cytokines according to our gene chip analysis using a panel of human cancer cell lines (JFCR39). We then validated predictive value of the cytokines in mCRC patients receiving regorafenib (discovery, N=54) and FTD/TPI (control, N=16). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL), before second cycle (2nd) and progressive disease (PD), and cytokine levels were measured using ELISA. Finally, we measured changes in cytokine levels and cell number in colorectal cancer cell lines treated with regorafenib. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Our gene chip analysis showed association between high matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-14 expression and high sensitivity to regorafenib, and the MMPs pathway was examined in blood samples. In the discovery cohort, high MMP14 levels at BL (mean 2.66 vs. 1.91 ng/ml, P=0.006) and PD (mean 2.34 vs. 1.71 ng/ml, P=0.02) were associated with tumor shrinkage, and high MMP14 levels at PD were associated with longer PFS (3.7 vs. 2.5 mos, HR0.45, 95%CI: 0.21-0.95, P=0.03). Patients with decreased MMP9 levels at 2nd had higher disease control rate (74% vs. 29%, P=0.002) and tumor shrinkage (52% vs. 13%, P=0.006), longer PFS (4.5 vs. 2.0 mos, HR0.34, 95%CI: 0.18-0.65, P<0.001) and OS (13.6 vs. 5.2 mos, HR0.35, 95%CI:0.18-0.68, P=0.001) than those with increased changes. These findings were not observed in the control cohort, but MMP9 levels decreased at 2nd in 93.8% of patients. In a regorafenib-sensitive cell line, HT29, MMP14 levels were increased whereas there was no change in regorafenib-resistant HCT15 cells. Conclusions: Our preclinical data-based translational validation study suggests that MMP14 and MMP9 may serve as a prognostic marker of regorafenib, and the results also provide insight for novel combination therapy with anti-MMP9 agent or FTD/TPI.
Outcomes with immunotherapy between Lynch syndrome vs non-Lynch syndrome microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer.
Authors: Eslinger Cody , McGary Alyssa , Walden Daniel , Emiloju Oluwadunni Eunice , Ahn Daniel H. , Sonbol Bassam Bassam , Bekaii-Saab Tanios S. , Zhu Mojun , Hubbard Joleen M. , Wu Christina 
Published: January 2024

175 Background: Alterations to mismatch repair (MMR) genes such as MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, can lead to microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. MMR mutations can be inherited in Lynch syndrome (LS) but can also be a result of de novo alterations resulting in MSI-H malignancies. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to improve survival in such patients (pts) compared to systemic chemotherapy. However, there is a paucity of information in the literature with respect to outcomes of pts with germline vs somatic MMR mutations in MSI-H colorectal cancer (CRC). Furthermore, the presence of underlying BRAF mutation confers resistance to chemotherapy in pts with CRC, however data regarding outcomes with immunotherapy in such pts with MSI-H CRC is lacking. Methods: Pt records from the Mayo Clinic (AZ, MN, FL) between 2008-2023 denoted as MSI-H CRC, were included for retrospective review. Pt demographics, treatment courses, and genomic profiles were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Outcome differences between sub-groups were accessed with the log rank test and univariate analyses were assessed with Cox-regression. Results: A total of 81 pt records were identified (n = 18 LS, n = 63 non-LS). Stage IV disease was found in 28% of LS pts vs 59% of non-LS pts at diagnosis. Pembrolizumab was the most common ICI selected for metastatic CRC pts for both LS and non-LS pts (65% vs 94%) with median treatment duration for each group 11.7 vs 8.8 months. There were no differences in OS or PFS for any stage between LS vs non-LS. Median OS for all patients was 82 months. For all stage IV patients, median OS was 44 months, and median PFS was 19 months. Interestingly, for stage IV pts treated with immunotherapy, tumors that harbored BRAF V600E mutation (n = 21) vs BRAF wild type (n = 20) had a significantly lower median OS 19 vs 113 months (HR = 2.69, p = 0.043) as well as median PFS 12 vs 95 months (HR = 2.48, p = 0.041). Conclusions: In this study, we found that patient treated with ICIs have similar outcomes in the presence of germline vs. somatic MMR mutations in MSI-H CRC. The presence of an associated BRAF V600E mutation, which occurs in non-LS MSI-H CRC conferred worse outcomes.
Identification of dMMR in metastatic colorectal and non-colorectal cancers in a private Mexican institution.
Authors: Filio Georgina , Dorantes-Heredia Rita , Motola Daniel , Escamilla-López Mariam , Tellez-Bernal Eduardo , Conde-Flores Emilio , Escalera Daniel , Medina-Ceballos Emilio , Jimenez-Aguilar Paulina , Ruiz-Morales Jose Manuel , Dorokhova Elena , Flores Lucia 
Published: January 2024

177 Background: DNA mismatch repair is a process in which normal cells maintain their original genomic information avoiding errors in mismatched nucleotides or base modifications from recombination processes. The failure of this process could drive carcinogenesis due to increased mutation rate as well as high microsatellite instability. It is estimated that the global average prevalence of dMMR/MSI-H across tumor types and stages is approximately 16%, with higher rates reported for early stages. However, the prevalence for colorectal (CRC) and non-colorectal cancers for this biomarker in Mexico has not been reported. Objective:To explore the prevalence of dMMR in metastatic CRC (mCRC) and non-CRC (gastric, esophageal, and endometrial cancer) from a private Mexican institution. Methods: In this retrospective study, the dMMR status of 215 samples were analyzed from a primary database of stored biopsies from patients diagnosed with metastatic CRC, gastric, esophageal, or endometrial cancers between January 2017 and December 2020. 65 records had information about MMR status. Samples were analyzed using a commercial kit to detect dMMR (BioSb). Prevalence of dMMR was stratified by age and gender and expressed as frequencies. Statistical analysis was conducted in SPSS. Results: dMMR was found in 18.5% (N=27) endometrial cancer cases, 12.7% (N=150) of CRC cases, and 8.3% (N=24) of gastric cancer cases. However, it was not detected in any cases of esophageal cancer (N=14). In CRC, we found a higher percentage of incidence in men than in women, 15.6% (n = 14/90) vs. 8.3% (n = 5/60) respectively. By age groups, the highest total percentage (20%) was observed among those 41-50 years old. The age group with the lowest dMMR rate was 31- 40 yo, with 7.7%. All cases of CRC patients over 91 yo (n=3), were pMMR. Conclusions: Even though this data is not representative for the entire Mexican population, it provides preliminary prevalence dMMR estimates for some key cancers. Additional research is needed to give the limited sample sizes available for non-CRC.