Allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation after a reduced‐intensity, preparative regimen
Authors: Pedrazzoli Paolo , Da Prada Gian Antonio , Giorgiani Giovanna , Schiavo Roberta , Zambelli Alberto , Giraldi Eugenia , Landonio Giuseppe , Locatelli Franco , Siena Salvatore , Cuna Gioacchino Robustelli Della 
Published: October 2004

AbstractBACKGROUNDThe immune‐mediated graft‐versus‐tumor (GVT) effect plays a therapeutic role in the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). More recently, it was reported that a GVT effect also occurred in patients who underwent transplantation for metastatic renal carcinoma. The authors carried out a pilot trial of allogeneic transplantation after a reduced‐intensity, preparative regimen in patients with refractory malignancies, including solid tumors. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the feasibility of this approach in terms of toxicity and engraftment and to document evidence of GVT effects.METHODSSeventeen patients with Stage IV malignancies (7 patients with renal cell carcinoma, 3 patients with sarcoma, 2 patients with breast carcinoma, 2 patients with Hodgkin disease, 1 patient with ovarian carcinoma, 1 patient with melanoma, and 1 patient with both melanoma and renal cell carcinoma) that were not amenable to further conventional treatment were enrolled. The median patient age was 43 years (range, 10–60 years). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) was 0–1 in 11 patients and 2–3 in 6 patients. Preparative treatment consisted of reduced‐intensity chemotherapy with fludarabine (30 mg/m2 per day for 4 consecutive days) and cyclophosphamide (30 mg/Kg per day for 2 consecutive days) prior to allogeneic HSCT from a human leukocyte antigen‐identical sibling. The median number of CD34+ cells infused was 6.06 × 106/kg (range, 1.5–14.0 × 106/kg). Graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporin‐A and short‐term methotrexate.RESULTSPatients who had a PS of 2–3 prior to undergoing HSCT experienced Grade 4 hematologic toxicities and Grade ≥ 3 organ toxicities and died of either treatment‐related complications or disease progression within 100 days from transplantation. By contrast, 10 of 11 patients who had a PS of 0–1 prior to undergoing HSCT experienced only short‐lasting, Grade ≤ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and no organ toxicity; 1 of 10 patients died of graft failure on Day +29 after undergoing HSCT. By Day +90, 100% donor chimerism was documented in all patients with a past history of heavy chemotherapy, whereas mixed donor chimerism was observed in the 4 patients with a past history of only 1 line of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy prior to entering the HSCT program. Grade 2–3 acute GVHD occurred in 5 patients. Among patients with a follow‐up > 100 days, 2 complete responses and 3 transitory partial responses were recorded.CONCLUSIONSWith this conditioning regimen, full donor chimerism was achieved rapidly only in patients who had received previous intensive chemotherapy. In a proportion of patients with refractory malignancies, allogeneic transplantation resulted in tumor regression. This novel therapeutic strategy may provide little benefit in patients with poor PS and rapidly progressing disease. Cancer 2002;94:2409–15. © 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10491