bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Does Spinal Anesthesia Result in a More Complete Sympathetic Block Than That from Epidural Anesthesia?
Authors: Stevens Rom A. , Beardsley David , White J. Lee , Kao Tzu-Cheg , Gantt Rod , Holman Stephen 
Published: November 2003

Background
Spinal and epidural injection of local anesthetics are used to produce sympathetic block to diagnose and treat certain chronic pain syndromes. It is not clear whether either form of regional anesthesia produces a complete sympathetic block. Spinal anesthesia using tetracaine has been reported to produce a decrease in plasma catecholamine concentrations. This has not been demonstrated for epidural anesthesia in humans with level of anesthesia below C8. One possible explanation is that spinal anesthesia results in a more complete sympathetic block than epidural anesthesia. To examine this question, a cross-over study was performed in young, healthy volunteers.

Methods
Ten subjects underwent both spinal and epidural anesthesia with lidocaine (plain) on the same day with complete recovery between blocks. By random assignment, spinal anesthesia and epidural anesthesia were induced via lumbar injection. Before and 30 min after local anesthetic injection, a cold pressor test (CPT) was performed. Blood was obtained to determine epinephrine and norepinephrine plasma concentrations at four stages: (1) 20 min after placing peripheral catheters, (2) at the end of a 2-min CPT (before conduction block), (3) 30 min after injection of epidural or spinal lidocaine, and (4) at the end of a second CPT (during anesthesia). Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, noninvasive cardiac index, and analgesia to pin-prick were monitored.

Results
Neither spinal nor epidural anesthesia changed baseline resting values of catecholamines or any hemodynamic variable, except heart rate, which was slightly decreased during spinal anesthesia. Median level of analgesia was T4 during spinal and T3 during epidural anesthesia. CPT before conduction block reliably increased heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, epinephrine, and norepinephrine. Conduction block attenuated the increase in response to CPT only in mean arterial pressure (spinal and epidural) and cardiac index (spinal only). Neither technique blocked the increase in heart rate, norepinephrine, or epinephrine to CPT.

Conclusions
Spinal anesthesia did not result in a more complete attenuation of the sympathetic response to a CPT than did epidural anesthesia. In response to the CPT, spinal anesthesia blocked the increase in cardiac index, and epidural anesthesia resulted in a decrease in total peripheral resistance compared to the pre-anesthesia state. The differences between the techniques are not significant and are of uncertain clinical implications.
A Comparison of Baroreflex Sensitivity during Isoflurane and Desflurane Anesthesia in Humans
Authors: Muzi Michael , Ebert Thomas J. 
Published: November 2003

Background
Desflurane anesthesia has been associated with heart rate (HR) and sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) responses that differ from those during isoflurane anesthesia. Whether these differences might be due to better preservation by desflurane of the baroreceptor reflex control of HR or SNA in humans was examined.

Methods
Baroreflex sensitivity was assessed in 18 volunteers anesthetized with either desflurane or isoflurane. Measurements of HR, blood pressure (BP), and efferent SNA (percutaneous recordings from the peroneal nerve) were made, and baroreflex sensitivity was evaluated at conscious baseline and during 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 MAC anesthesia. Baroreflex responses were triggered by bolus intravenous injections of nitroprusside (100 micrograms) and phenylephrine (150 micrograms). The linear portions of the baroreflex curves relating HR to mean arterial pressure and relating SNA to diastolic pressure were determined to obtain cardiac and sympathetic baroslopes, respectively.

Results
Cardiac (HR) baroslopes were equally diminished at increasing MAC of both anesthetics. Sympathetic baroslopes were preserved at 0.5 MAC isoflurane but diminished at 0.5 MAC desflurane. Higher MAC produced equal depression of sympathetic baroslopes with both anesthetics.

Conclusions
Increasing MAC of desflurane and isoflurane anesthesia results in similar and progressive decreases in BP but dissimilar SNA and HR responses. These differences are not explained by disparate effects of these anesthetics on the baroreceptor reflex control of SNA or HR.
Abnormal Action Potential Responses to Halothane in Heart Muscle Isolated from Malignant Hyperthermia-susceptible Pigs
Authors: Roewer Norbert , Greim Clemens , Rumberger Eckhart , Schulte am Esch Jochen 
Published: November 2003

Background
During human and porcine malignant hyperthermia (MH), cardiac dysrhythmias and altered myocardial function can be observed. It is unknown whether a primary abnormality in cardiac muscle contributes to the cardiac symptoms during MH. An abnormal response to halothane has recently been demonstrated in action potentials (APs) from MH-susceptible (MHS) human skeletal muscles. We investigated the electrophysiologic properties in trabeculae isolated from the right ventricles of normal (MHN) and MHS pigs.

Methods
The experiments were performed on electrically stimulated (1 Hz) trabeculae isolated from the right ventricles of MHS and MHN pigs. Resting membrane potentials, APs, and tension were measured with and without the presence of 1% halothane. In addition, the halothane-equilibrated muscles were exposed to caffeine in increasing doses (1, 2, and 4 mM).

Results
In the absence of halothane, resting potential and AP characteristics in MHS and MHN muscles did not differ significantly. Halothane did not alter resting potentials but produced different alterations in the APs in MHS and MHN muscles, whereas the decrease in twitch tension was identical. In contrast to reductions in the AP amplitude and duration in MHN muscle, halothane produced an enlargement of the APs in MHS muscle. The addition of caffeine caused nearly identical prolongations of AP duration in MHS and MHN muscles.

Conclusions
This in vitro study demonstrates that halothane produces abnormal alterations in the dynamic electric properties of the ventricular excitable membrane from MHS pigs. These results suggest a latent defect in the myocardium of MHS pigs that becomes apparent in the presence of MH-triggering agents.
pH-Stat Management Reduces the Cerebral Metabolic Rate for Oxygen during Profound Hypothermia (17 degrees Celsius)
Authors: Hindman Bradley J. , Dexter Franklin , Cutkomp Johann , Smith Tom 
Published: November 2003

Background
Greater cerebral metabolic suppression may increase the brain's tolerance to ischemia. Previous studies examining the magnitude of metabolic suppression afforded by profound hypothermia suggest that the greater arterial carbon dioxide tension of pH-stat management may increase metabolic suppression when compared with alpha-stat management.

Methods
New Zealand White rabbits, anesthetized with fentanyl and diazepam, were maintained during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at a brain temperature of 17 degrees C with alpha-stat (group A, n = 9) or pH-stat (group B, n = 9) management. Measurements of brain temperature, systemic hemodynamics, arterial and cerebral venous blood gases and oxygen content, cerebral blood flow (CBF) (radiolabeled microspheres), and cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen (CMRO2) (Fick) were made in each animal at 65 and 95 min of CPB. To control for arterial pressure and CBF differences between techniques, additional rabbits underwent CPB at 17 degrees C. In group C (alpha-stat, n = 8), arterial pressure was decreased with nitroglycerin to values observed with pH-stat management. In group D (pH-stat, n = 8), arterial pressure was increased with angiotensin II to values observed with alpha-stat management. In groups C and D, CBF and CMRO2 were determined before (65 min of CPB) and after (95 min of CPB) arterial pressure manipulation.

Results
In groups A (alpha-stat) and B (pH-stat), arterial pressure; hemispheric CBF (44 +/- 17 vs. 21 +/- 4 ml.100 g-1.min-1 [median +/- quartile deviation]; P = 0.017); and CMRO2 (0.54 +/- 0.13 vs. 0.32 +/- 0.10 ml O2 x 100 g-1.min-1; P = 0.0015) were greater in alpha-stat than in pH-stat animals, respectively. As a result of arterial pressure manipulation, in groups C (alpha-stat) and D (pH-stat) neither arterial pressure (75 +/- 2 vs. 78 +/- 2 mmHg) nor hemispheric CBF (40 +/- 10 vs. 48 +/- 6 ml.100 g-1.min-1; P = 0.21) differed between alpha-stat and pH-stat management, respectively. Nevertheless, CMRO2 was greater in alpha-stat than in pH-stat animals (0.71 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.45 +/- 0.10 ml O2 x 100g-1.min-1, respectively; P = 0.002).

Conclusions
At 17 degrees C, CMRO2 with pH-stat management is 35-40% less than that with alpha-stat management and is independent of CBF or arterial pressure differences between the techniques.
Neurologic Evaluation of the Rat during Sciatic Nerve Block with Lidocaine
Authors: Thalhammer J. G. , Vladimirova M. , Bershadsky B. , Strichartz G. R. 
Published: November 2003

Background
Quantitative behavioral testing is necessary to establish a reproducible measure of differential functional blockade during regional anesthesia. Methods for assessment of the neurologic status (mental status, posture, gait, proprioception, motor function, autonomic function, and nociception) in veterinary neurology were adapted for the rat and used to monitor functional changes separately during a sciatic nerve block.

Methods
Sprague-Dawley rats were acclimated to laboratory routine before the study so that lidocaine (0.1 ml, 1%) could be injected near the sciatic notch without any chemical restraint. The onset, duration, and magnitude of functional losses were monitored. Proprioceptive integrity was evaluated by assessing the response to tactile placing and the hopping response. Extensor postural thrust, a test for postural reactions in small animals, was assessed on a digital balance and found adequate for quantifying motor function. Analgesia was assessed by measuring withdrawal response latencies to noxious thermal stimulation (51 degrees C) and to superficial and deep noxious pinches. Autonomic function was monitored by measuring skin temperature. Contralateral limb function was used as an internal control, and injection of saline was used as an external control in separate, control animals.

Results
Onset of postural and gait abnormalities were observed as early as 40 s after injection. On each occasion proprioceptive impairment was detected first, followed by impairment of motor function and nociception. Complete absence of proprioception occurred from 10 to 30 min (n = 9) and of motor function at 30 min after injection (n = 10); both functions were fully recovered by 120 min. A unilateral increase in skin temperature on the foot was detected by 1 min; had reached its maximum change, 5.3 +/- 0.7 degrees C, at 10 min; and had returned to control levels at 60 min after injection (n = 12). Withdrawal response to cutaneous or superficial pain was absent in all ten animals from 5 to 30 min whereas the response to deep pain was absent in all ten animals at 20 min only. The response to noxious stimulation recovered at 90 min. Attention was paid to the temporal relation of the impairment of various functions.

Conclusions
Quantitative observations of the onset, offset, and intensity of differential functional impairment or block over time will make it possible to establish the doses and conditions for local anesthetics that result in differential nerve block and will permit comparison of these changes among different drugs and "clinical" protocols.
Dexmedetomidine Premedication Attenuates Ketamine-induced Cardiostimulatory Effects and Postanesthetic Delirium
Authors: Levanen Jaakko , Makela Marja-Leena , Scheinin Harry 
Published: November 2003

Background
Dexmedetomidine is a new potent and highly selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist with sedative-hypnotic and anesthetic sparing properties. Because of its sympathoinhibitory activity, it may prove useful in balancing the cardiostimulatory effects and attenuating the adverse central nervous system effects of ketamine.

Methods
A double-blind, randomized and comparative parallel-group study design was employed in 40 volunteers with ASA physical status 1 who were scheduled for elective superficial surgery under ketamine anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine (2.5 micrograms/kg, n = 20) or midazolam (0.07 mg/kg, n = 20) was administered intramuscularly 45 min before induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg ketamine intravenously, and muscle relaxation was achieved with vecuronium. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen (2:1) and additional 1 mg/kg intravenous ketamine boluses according to clinical and cardiovascular criteria. Hypotension and bradycardia were treated by increasing the intravenous infusion rate of crystalloids and intravenous atropine, respectively. Sedative and anxiolytic properties, intra- and postoperative drug requirements, psychomotor and cognitive impairments, and cardiovascular effects were compared between the two groups.

Results
Dexmedetomidine and midazolam proved to have equal sedative and anxiolytic effects after intramuscular administration, but dexmedetomidine induced significantly less preoperative psychomotor impairment and less anterograde amnesia than did midazolam. Compared to midazolam, dexmedetomidine decreased the need for intraoperative ketamine and was more effective in reducing ketamine-induced adverse central nervous system effects. Dexmedetomidine also was superior to midazolam in attenuating the hemodynamic responses to intubation and the cardiostimulatory effects of ketamine in general, but it increased the incidence of intra- and postoperative bradycardia.

Conclusions
These results suggest that premedication with 2.5 micrograms/kg dexmedetomidine is effective in attenuating the cardiostimulatory and postanesthetic delirium effects of ketamine. However, because of its propensity to cause bradycardia, routine use of an anticholinergic drug should be considered.
Oral Clonidine Premedication Blunts the Heart Rate Response to Intravenous Atropine in Awake Children
Authors: Nishina Kahoru , Mikawa Katsuya , Maekawa Nobuhiro , Obara Hidefumi 
Published: November 2003

Background
Clonidine, which is known to have analgesic and sedative properties, has recently been shown to be an effective preanesthetic medication in children. The drug may cause side effects, including bradycardia and hypotension. This study was conducted to evaluate the ability of intravenous atropine to increase the heart rate (HR) in awake children receiving clonidine preanesthetic medication.

Methods
We studied 96 otherwise healthy children, 8-13 yr old, undergoing minor surgery. They received, at random, oral clonidine 2 or 4 micrograms.kg-1 or placebo 105 min before scheduled induction of anesthesia. Part I (n = 48, 16 per group): When hemodynamic parameters after insertion of a venous catheter had been confirmed to be stable, atropine was administered in incremental doses of 2.5, 2.5, and 5 micrograms.kg-1 every 2 min. The HR and blood pressure were recorded at 1-min intervals. Part II (n = 48, 16 per group): After the recording of baseline hemodynamic values, successive doses of atropine (5 micrograms.kg-1 every 2 min, to 40 micrograms.kg-1), were administered until HR increased by 20 beats.min-1. The HR and blood pressure were recorded at 1-min intervals.

Results
Part I: The increases in HR in response to a cumulative dose of atropine 10 micrograms.kg-1 were 33 +/- 3%, 16 +/- 3%, and 8 +/- 2% (mean +/- SEM) in children receiving placebo, clonidine 2 micrograms.kg-1, and clonidine 4 micrograms.kg-1, respectively (P < 0.05). Part II: The HR in the control group increased by more than 20 beats.min-1 in response to atropine 20 micrograms.kg-1 or less. In two patients in the clonidine 4 micrograms.kg-1 group, HR did not increase by 20 beats.min-1 even after 40 micrograms.kg-1 of atropine.

Conclusions
Oral clonidine premedication (4 micrograms.kg-1) blunted the increase in HR after intravenous atropine in awake children, although clonidine 2 micrograms.kg-1 did not. A larger dose of atropine was required to increase the HR by 20 beats.min-1 in children receiving the premedicant in the larger dose.
Increasing Mean Skin Temperature Linearly Reduces the Core- temperature Thresholds for Vasoconstriction and Shivering in Humans
Authors: Cheng Christi , Matsukawa Takashi , Sessler Daniel I. , Makoto Ozaki , Kurz Andrea , Merrifield Benjamin , Lin Hank , Olofsson Par 
Published: November 2003

Background
The contribution of mean skin temperature to the thresholds for sweating and active precapillary vasodilation has been evaluated in numerous human studies. In contrast, the contribution of skin temperature to the control of cold responses such as arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction and shivering is less well established. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that mean skin and core temperatures are linearly related at the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds in men. Because the relation between skin and core temperatures might vary by gender, the cutaneous contribution to thermoregulatory control also was determined in women.

Methods
In the first portion of the study, six men participated on 5 randomly ordered days, during which mean skin temperatures were maintained near 31, 34, 35, 36, and 37 degrees C. Core hypothermia was induced by central venous infusion of cold lactated Ringer's solution sufficient to induce peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. The core-temperature thresholds were then plotted against skin temperature and a linear regression fit to the values. The relative skin and core contributions to the control of each response were calculated from the slopes of the regression equations. In the second portion of the study, six women participated on three randomly ordered days, during which mean skin temperatures were maintained near 31, 35, and 37 degrees C. At each designated skin temperature, core hypothermia sufficient to induce peripheral vasoconstriction and/or shivering was again induced by central venous infusion of cold lactated Ringer's solution. The cutaneous contributions to control of each response were then calculated from the skin- and core-temperature pairs at the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds.

Results
There was a linear relation between mean skin and core temperatures at the response thresholds in the men: r = 0.90 +/- 0.06 for vasoconstriction and r = 0.94 +/- 0.07 for shivering. Skin temperature contributed 20 +/- 6% to vasoconstriction and 19 +/- 8% to shivering. Skin temperature in the women contributed to 18 +/- 4% to vasoconstriction and 18 +/- 7% to shivering, values not differing significantly from those in men. There was no apparent correlation between the cutaneous contributions to vasoconstriction and shivering in individual volunteers.

Conclusions
These data indicate that skin and core temperatures contribute linearly to the control of vasoconstriction and shivering in men and that the cutaneous contributions average approximately 20% in both men and women. The same coefficients thus can be used to compensate for experimental skin temperature manipulations in men and women. However, the cutaneous contributions to each response vary among volunteers; furthermore, the contributions to the two responses vary within volunteers.
Propofol Linearly Reduces the Vasoconstriction and Shivering Thresholds
Authors: Matsukawa Takashi , Kurz Andrea , Sessler Daniel I. , Bjorksten Andrew R. , Merrifield Benjamin , Cheng Christi 
Published: November 2003

Background
Skin temperature is best kept constant when determining response thresholds because both skin and core temperatures contribute to thermoregulatory control. In practice, however, it is difficult to evaluate both warm and cold thresholds while maintaining constant cutaneous temperature. A recent study shows that vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds are a linear function of skin and core temperatures, with skin contributing 20 +/- 6% and 19 +/- 8%, respectively. (Skin temperature has long been known to contribute approximately 10% to the control of sweating). Using these relations, we were able to experimentally manipulate both skin and core temperatures, subsequently compensate for the changes in skin temperature, and finally report the results in terms of calculated core-temperature thresholds at a single-designated skin temperature.

Methods
Five volunteers were each studied on 4 days: (1) control; (2) a target blood propofol concentration of 2 micrograms/ml; (3) a target concentration of 4 micrograms/ml; and (4) a target concentration of 8 micrograms/ml. On each day, we increased skin and core temperatures sufficiently to provoke sweating. Skin and core temperatures were subsequently reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. We mathematically compensated for changes in skin temperature by using the established linear cutaneous contributions to the control of sweating (10%) and to vasoconstriction and shivering (20%). From these calculated core-temperature thresholds (at a designated skin temperature of 35.7 degrees C), the propofol concentration-response curves for the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds were analyzed using linear regression. We validated this new method by comparing the concentration-dependent effects of propofol with those obtained previously with an established model.

Results
The concentration-response slopes for sweating and vasoconstriction were virtually identical to those reported previously. Propofol significantly decreased the core temperature triggering vasoconstriction (slope = -0.6 +/- 0.1 degrees C.micrograms-1.ml-1; r2 = 0.98 +/- 0.02) and shivering (slope = -0.7 +/- 0.1 degrees C.micrograms -1.ml-1; r2 = 0.95 +/- 0.05). In contrast, increasing the blood propofol concentration increased the sweating threshold only slightly (slope = 0.1 +/- 0.1 degrees C.micrograms -1.ml-1; r2 = 0.46 +/- 0.39).

Conclusions
Advantages of this new model include its being nearly noninvasive and requiring relatively little core-temperature manipulation. Propofol only slightly alters the sweating threshold, but markedly reduces the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Reductions in the shivering and vasoconstriction thresholds are similar; that is, the vasoconstriction-to-shivering range increases only slightly during anesthesia.