bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer in the rural community oncology setting.
Authors: McKean Heidi Ann , Nordstrom James , Gaster Sam , Whiting Emily , Guardado Jesse , Choudhry Sabina , Johnson Thomas , Casey Matthew , Murphy Charles , McKean Heidi Ann , Grow Joel , Sulaiman Raed , Quist Erin , O'Neill Elizabeth , Stoltenberg Kelci , Schultz Jill 
Published: January 2024

41 Background: The treatment of localized rectal adenocarcinomas with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) has become the national standard. Data on the efficacy of TNT in a predominantly rural community oncology setting is limited. Methods: This ongoing retrospective analysis included 94 patients with proficient MMR Stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma treated with traditional neoadjuvant treatment of chemoradiation followed by surgical resection +/- adjuvant chemotherapy, or Consolidation (chemoradiation upfront) TNT versus Induction (chemotherapy upfront) TNT followed by surgical resection, diagnosed between 2017 and 2022 and treated at the Avera Cancer Institute in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The primary objectives were to compare the pathologic response and treatment completion rates in patients with rectal cancer treated with TNT to patients treated with traditional neoadjuvant treatment. The secondary objective was to compare the pathologic response rate for TNT at different tumor locations. Results: Of 94 patients assessed, 54 patients received traditional neoadjuvant treatment and 40 patients received TNT. For patients treated with traditional neoadjuvant treatment, 43% (n=23) completed all recommended treatment, with 63% (n=34) achieving a partial response (PR) and 19% (n=10) a complete pathologic response (CR). For patients treated with TNT, 93% (n=37) completed all recommended treatment, and 68% (n=27) achieved a PR and 15% (n=6) achieved a CR. For patients that received Consolidation TNT (n=21), 66% (n=12) achieved a PR and 21% (n=4) achieved a CR. For patients that received Induction TNT (n=19), 68% (n=13) achieved a PR and 11% (n=2) achieved a CR. For patients with high tumor location (n=4) treated with TNT, 50% (n=2) achieved a PR and one patient achieved a CR (25%). For patients with mid tumor location (n=18) treated with TNT, 67% (n=12) achieved a PR and 22% (n=4) achieved a CR. For patients with low tumor location (n=18) treated with TNT, 72% (n=13) achieved a PR and one patient (6%) achieved a CR. Conclusions: The treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma with TNT in the rural community cancer center setting is achievable with a higher completion rate compared to traditional neoadjuvant treatment. Our results also show a trend toward a higher complete pathologic response rate in Consolidation compared to Induction approach and in high/mid rectal tumors compared to low rectal tumors. Future work will be conducted to assess for any differences in recurrence and survival.
Impact of primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcomes of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer treated with FLOT: A single-center retrospective analysis.
Authors: Gomes Pedro Henrique Benfatti , Torrez Miguel Adolfo Lopez , Souza E Silva Virgilio , Camandaroba Marcos Pedro Guedes , Cavalher Felicia Peterson , Taboada Rodrigo Gomes , Felismino Tiago Cordeiro , Brito Angelo Borsarelli Carvalho 
Published: January 2024

414 Background: The role of primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) treated with FLOT is currently unknown. Although original FLOT4 study did not recommend PP, the use of G-CSF is common in clinical practice to avoid serious complications. However, its use is associated with increased financial costs. Methods: This is a retrospective, single-institution study. We included patients with pathologically confirmed LAGC who received perioperative FLOT4. Patients were categorized in two groups: PP versus no- PP. Our objectives were to compare frequency of grades 3 or 4 neutropenia (G3/4N) and febrile neutropenia (FN) between PP and non-PP patients. We also evaluate the association between pathological complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) according to the use of PP. Binomial variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate median DFS and OS and respective 95% confidence intervals [95%CI] and any difference assessed by the log-rank test. Results: From January 2019 until December 2022, 122 LAGC patients were treated with perioperative FLOT. Median age was 56 years, 53.2% were female and 84.4% were ECOG 0. Primary prophylaxis (PP) was used by 58 patients (47.5%); there was no difference between clinical and tumor features between both groups regarding age, sex, ECOG, T and N staging and Lauren’s subtype. PP costs raised treatment costs up to 15%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred more frequently among patients without PP (65.6 vs. 1.7%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in the frequency of FN between groups (7.8 vs. 0%; p = 0.06). Overall patients, pCR occurred in 11.8% os patients. Regarding the influence of PP in pathological response after FLOT chemotherapy, there was no difference between PP vs non-PP patients with pCR (14.3% vs 9.5%, p = 0.57). Median follow-up was 27.4 (range 2.8 – 70.6 months). Twenty-six patients (21.3%) died during follow-up. Median OS was 52.5 months (95% CI: 47.1-57.8). Median OS for patients in PP and no PP groups were 44.5 and 56.2 months (log-rank P =0.06), respectively. Median DFS was 43.1 months (95% CI: 37.2-48.9). Median DFS for patients in PP and no PP groups were 39.6 and 43.5 months (log-rank P =0.80), respectively. Conclusions: Despite the reduction in the frequency of G3/4N, rates of FN among patients treated with FLOT with G-CSF are too low to justify its use in a routine basis. Furthermore, PP is not associated with relevant clinical endpoints such as pCR neither OS or DFS. Based on this, PP in such situations should not be routinely used due to its financial costs.
The efficacy of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with early recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy.
Authors: Okemoto Dai , Yamaguchi Toshifumi , Sugino Kanako , Matsuo Nanako , Sanomura Makoto , Kameishi Shin , Kadono Toru , Yukami Hiroki , Goto Masahiro , Nishikawa Hiroki 
Published: January 2024

43 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) underwent surgery.However, the efficacy of chemotherapy for early recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of chemotherapy for CRC with early recurrence during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed CRC patients who underwent surgery at 3 institutions between 2016 and 2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: ECOG performance status was 0 or 1, histology was adenocarcinoma, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy following surgical resection, early recurrence during or within 12 months after adjuvant chemotherapy and no prior treatment for CRC after early recurrence. The interval from the last administration of adjuvant chemotherapy to recurrence was defined as the recurrence-free interval (RFI). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed according to the RFI. Results: Of 448 patients, 32 patients were eligible. Median age was 57 years (range 26–79), 14 patients (44%) were male and ECOG performance status 0 / 1 was 29 (91%) / 3 (9%). RAS wild-type / mutant was 12 (38%) / 20 (62%) and right / left as sidedness was 21 (66%) / 11 (34%). Regarding adjuvant chemotherapy, 4 patients (12%) received single-agent therapy, while 28 patients (88%) received combination therapy with two agents. Palliative chemotherapy after early recurrence included Oxaliplatin-based regimens in 13 patients (41%), irinotecan-based regimens in another 13 patients (41%), and other regimens in 6 patients (18%). For all patients, the median PFS and OS were 10.4 months and 43.0 months, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 34.4% and 75.0%, respectively. When patients were divided into RFI < 6 months and RFI ≥ 6 months, the ORR was superior in the RFI ≥ 6 months group to RFI < 6 months group (56 % vs. 26%). The PFS (median 10.4 months vs. 17.8 months, HR 0.92; 95% Cl 0.36-2.38, p = 0.87) and OS (median 31.3 months vs. 43.0 months, HR 0.97; 95% Cl 0.31-3.08, p = 0.97) did not differ between the RFI < 6 months group and the RFI ≥ 6 months group. Multivariate analysis for OS indicated a trend toward a poor prognosis in the RFI < 6 months group compared to the RFI ≥ 6 months group (HR 1.78; 95% CI 0.35-8.98, p = 0.48). Conclusions: In patients with CRC experienced early recurrence, the RFI < 6 months group had a trend of poor efficacy compared to the RFI of ≥ 6 months group.
Impact of Hispanic ethnicity on immunotherapy outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma: Insights from the National Cancer Database.
Authors: Gaur Sumit , Dwivedi Alok Kumar , Eiring Ana , Konstantinidis Ioannis , Rukhsan Rabia , Singh Vishwajeet 
Published: January 2024

438 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest-growing cancer in the US with more age-adjusted incident cases in Hispanics compared to non-Hispanics. Immunotherapies are considered integral part of treatment for most unresectable HCC. Recent multinational phase III trials suggest the benefit of immunotherapies may differ based on geographic region and underlying etiology of HCC. We hypothesized that Hispanic ethnicity might influence responses to immunotherapy in HCC. Methods: We analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess the impact of immunotherapy on overall survival (OS) in Hispanic patients with HCC. The database was queried for liver cancer from 2004 to 2020. Kaplan Meier method was used to assess OS and a log-rank test was used to compare survival distribution between Hispanic and non-Hispanic groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the adjusted effect of ethnicity on OS based on immunotherapy status. NCDB is a joint project of the Commission on Cancer (CoC) of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The CoC's NCDB and the hospitals participating in the CoCÕs NCDB are the source of the de-identified data used herein. Results: A total of 225079 patients were identified of whom 2036 patients (0.9%) received immunotherapy as first-line treatment. Patients with non-Hispanic ethnicity, male sex, who received treatment at academic/research institutions, and were insured were more likely to receive immunotherapy. In the entire cohort, there was no difference (p=0.94) in survival between those who did not receive immunotherapy (median OS,11.63 months; IQR: 2.79, 34.83) vs. those who did (median OS, 10.68 months, IQR: 5.19, 23.29[DA2]). There were more Hispanics in the cohort who did not receive immunotherapy (12.28% vs. 10.61%). In the adjusted Cox analysis, Hispanics had a reduced risk of death than non-Hispanics among patients who did not receive immunotherapy (HR: 0.873, 95%CI, 0.858-0.889; p<0.001). Among patients with immunotherapy, there was no OS difference between ethnicities (HR 0.904, 95% CI, 0.755-1.082; p 0.271). Conclusions: Hispanics were less likely to receive immunotherapy than non-Hispanics. Although Hispanics had a better OS than non-Hispanics among patients without immunotherapy, the differences no longer persist among patients who received immunotherapy. These findings suggest that Hispanic ethnicity may influence responses to immunotherapy. As compared to non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics with HCC have significantly more nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and alcohol-related liver disease as contributing factors. A better understanding of the impact of immunotherapies on alcoholic and nonalcoholic liver disease-related HCC is needed.
Relative and collective contribution of liver and bile duct cancer risk factors among minority groups in California.
Authors: Monge B. M. Cecilia , Arroyo Figueroa Gabriela , Greten Tim F. 
Published: January 2024

439 Background: Liver and Bile Duct Cancer is a significant public health concern with higher incidence rates observed among people belonging to racial and ethnic minority groups compared to non-Hispanic White people. This study aims to understand which underlying factors contribute most to this disparity in liver and bile duct cancer. Methods: The California Health Maps database was analyzed from 2015-2019, including 58 counties: consistent with the SEER census and CDC PLACES Project. Variables examined included race, ethnicity, age, health insurance status, foreign-born status, rural residence, obesity prevalence, socioeconomic status, smoking status, and percentage of individuals receiving preventative care. Linear regression analysis was used to determine which factors significantly predict higher prevalence of liver and bile duct cancer. Results: The population consisted of 39,283,494 people, predominantly Hispanic (39%) with 38.7% being non-Hispanic White; 15.5% Asian or Pacific Islander and 6.2% non-Hispanic Black. Hispanic people accounted for 21% of the 868,882 total cancer cases and 33% of the 22,439 cases of liver and bile duct cancers reported. Race and ethnicity were the most substantial predictors of liver and bile duct cancer prevalence; counties with a higher monitory population exhibited higher incidence rates (Hispanic: R=0.39; p=0.003, Black: R=0.39; p=0.004, White: R=-0.55; p<0.0001, Asian: R=0.33; p=0.01). Being foreign-born (R=0.45; p=0.0008), residing in non-rural areas (R= -0.33; p=0.01), and lacking preventative care (women: R= -0.30; p=0.03, men: R= -0.37; p=0.006) were also significantly associated with increased liver and bile duct cancer incidence rates (Table). Conclusions: This study highlights the association of race, ethnicity, and access to healthcare services with higher incidence rates of liver and bile duct cancer among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black people compared to non-Hispanic White people. Addressing these disparities is crucial for promoting equitable health outcomes in liver and bile duct cancer. [Table: see text]
Racial/ethnic disparities in the effectiveness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) vs. tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) among veterans with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).
Authors: Kaplan David Edward , Tan Amie , Xiang Cheryl , Mu Fan , Hernandez Sairy , Ogale Sarika , Sundar Manasvi , Lin Yilu , Shi Lizheng , Singal Amit G. 
Published: January 2024

448 Background: The etiology of liver disease and HCC often differs by race and ethnicity, which may lead to potential differential effectiveness of immunotherapy (IO) by race/ethnicity. However, clinical trials for HCC have historically had limited racial diversity. Emerging data has characterized the real-world effectiveness of A+B, the standard of care for first-line (1L) uHCC. This study assessed whether there is racial/ethnic difference in the effectiveness of A+B compared to TKIs, including sorafenib (S) or lenvatinib (L). Methods: A population-based retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Data Warehouse. Non-Hispanic White, African American (AA), and Hispanic patients diagnosed with uHCC between 2017 and 2022 who initiated 1L A+B (on or after 2020), S, or L were selected. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regression analysis with race/ethnicity as a treatment modifier (adjusting for age, region, extrahepatic metastases, etiology, presence of cirrhosis, comorbidity index, prior local therapies, Child-Pugh [CP] class, and Albumin-Bilirubin [ABLI] grades) were conducted to investigate the racial/ethnic differences in the effectiveness of A+B vs S or L. Results: Of 1,738 patients, 1,140 were White (20% A+B, 56% S, 24% L), 437 were AA (25% A+B, 50% S, 25% L), and 161 were Hispanic (22% A+B, 57% S, 21% L). Compared to Whites, a significantly higher proportion of AAs had underlying hepatitis C (87% vs 56%, p<0.05). There was a trend towards a lower proportion of CP B and C and less ascites in AAs compared to Whites. Table shows median OS (mOS) by race and regimen, along with hazard ratios (HRs) from the multivariate analysis. The survival benefit associated with A+B compared with S or L was numerically greater in AA patients versus White patients, although the difference did not achieve statistical significance. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of 1L uHCC patients, A+B demonstrated a significant survival advantage over TKIs across racial/ethnic groups. Understanding the factors contributing to the effectiveness of A+B across racial/ethnic groups could provide valuable insights for guiding future trials and initiatives aimed at addressing racial disparities in HCC. [Table: see text]
Real-world survival outcomes and treatment patterns in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): Results from the OREIOS study.
Authors: Chan Stephen , Breder Valeriy Vladimirovich , Shao Yu Yun , Tai David , Waked Imam , Ganguly Sandip , Alolayan Ashwaq , Aboutaleb Ahmed , Farag Heba , Ryu Min-Hee 
Published: January 2024

449 Background: Recent advances in systemic therapies have revolutionized the management of HCC. However, there is limited real-world data on treatment patterns and survival outcomes in pts with uHCC. OREIOS (NCT05239507) study determined the clinical characteristics, management patterns and survival outcomes in pts with uHCC from 12 countries across Asia, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa. Methods: This non-interventional, retrospective study included pts with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C unresectable or advanced/metastatic HCC at index date (date of diagnosis), diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2019. We present the clinicodemographic characteristics, treatment patterns, median overall survival (mOS), landmark survival (12 and 24 months), and median progression-free survival (mPFS). Results: A total of 1115 pts (median [range] age: 63 [18.0-97.0] yrs) were assessed; 83.2% (928/1115) were males, 49.1% (422/859) were current or ex-smokers, 21.4% (122/571) consumed alcohol. Most common etiologies were hepatitis B (48.9% [529/1082]), hepatitis C (23.1% [250/1082]) and alcoholic liver disease (6.6% [72/1082]). At index date, 22.3% (249/1115) and 77.7% (866/1115) presented with BCLC stage B and C, respectively with main portal vein invasion in 23.5% (262/1114), >50% liver involvement in 23.1% (250/1081) and extrahepatic metastases in 48.5% (541/1115). After index date, treatment modalities included systemic therapy (88.2% [992/1112] (including sorafenib [77.5%], nivolumab [21.3%], lenvatinib [19.8%], regorafenib [15.6%]), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (20.8% [232/1115]), and surgery (2.6% [29/1115]). The mPFS was 6.6 (95% CI 6.0, 7.2) months and mOS was 13.1 (95% CI 11.6, 14.2) months. Conclusions: Our study provides real-world data on treatment patterns and reports poor prognosis with pts reaching a mOS of ∼13 months. With novel agents and combination therapies being approved for uHCC, integrating them in routine care is important to improve survival. Alongside, further real-world studies are warranted for evaluating the change in treatment patterns and prognosis. Clinical trial information: NCT05239507 . [Table: see text]
Front-line use of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab and subsequent therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Authors: Barzi Afsaneh , Lunacsek Orsolya , Pisa Federica , Pan Xiaoyun , Ostojic Helene , Vassilev Zdravko 
Published: January 2024

45 Background: Emerging data shows that the higher incidence of mCRC in younger patients (pts) is accompanied by more aggressive front-line treatment with chemotherapies, such as FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab (triplet+bev). We explored the use of triplet+bev and subsequent therapies in a representative sample of community practices in the USA. Methods: This was a retrospective study using the nationwide de-identified Flatiron Health Electronic Health Record-derived database from January 1, 2013, to February 28, 2023. The use of triplet+bev and subsequent treatments were analyzed in pts with newly diagnosed mCRC (≥18 years [yrs] of age) by oncologist-defined, rule-based line of treatment (LOT) and age (18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 yrs). Results: Of 24,285 eligible pts, 14%, 37%, and 49% were 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 yrs at treatment initiation, respectively (Table). Triplet+bev use in any LOT was the most prevalent in the youngest age group (18–49 yrs) at 7% (Table). Two-thirds (67%) received triplet+bev in first line (1L) and 23% in second line (2L), 57% were male, and 34% had a KRAS mutation (23% missing). From 2013 to 2022, triplet+bev use in newly treated pts increased; this trend was more pronounced in pts 18–49 yrs (Table). Among pts not censored before the end of the respective LOT, median duration of 1L and 2L triplet+bev was 25.1 and 21.6 weeks, respectively (Table). For non-censored pts with and without a KRAS mutation, respectively, median duration of triplet+bev was 26.1 vs 23.5 weeks in 1L and 21.6 vs 16.5 weeks in 2L. Most frequently used new agents after 1L triplet+bev included anti-EGFR (panitumumab or cetuximab; 19%), TAS-102 (12%), regorafenib (10%), and capecitabine (3%). Most frequently used new agents after 2L triplet+bev were TAS-102 (21%), anti-EGFR (17%), regorafenib (15%), and pembrolizumab (8%). Conclusions: Our study shows that the use of triplet+bev has increased in pts with mCRC over time, particularly in those <50 yrs. Most frequent subsequent therapies across all pts following 1L and 2L triplet+bev included TAS-102, anti-EGFR, and regorafenib. Future research is needed to identify the optimal treatment strategies after triplet+bev. [Table: see text]