The nature of the free energy barriers to two‐state folding
Authors: Akmal Arya , Muñoz Victor 
Published: June 2004

AbstractWe introduce a simple procedure to analyze the temperature dependence of the folding and unfolding rates of two‐state proteins. We start from the simple transition‐state‐like rate expression: k = Deffexp(−ΔGTS/RT), in which upper and lower bounds for the intra‐chain effective diffusion coefficient (Deff) are obtained empirically using the timescales of elementary processes in protein folding. From the changes in ΔGTS as a function of temperature, we calculate enthalpies and heat capacities of activation, together with the more elusive entropies of activation. We then estimate the conformational entropy of the transition state by extrapolation to the temperature at which the solvation entropy vanishes by cancellation between polar and apolar terms. This approach is based on the convergence temperatures for the entropy of solvating apolar (∼385 K) and polar groups (∼335 K), the assumption that the structural properties of the transition state are somewhere in between the unfolded and folded states, and the established relationship between observed heat capacity and solvent accessibility.1 To circumvent the lack of structural information about transition states, we use the empirically determined heat capacities of activation as constraints to identify the extreme values of the transition state conformational entropy that are consistent with experiment. The application of this simple approach to six two‐state folding proteins for which there is temperature‐dependent data available in the literature provides important clues about protein folding. For these six proteins, we obtain an average equilibrium cost in conformational entropy of −4.3 cal · mol−1K−1per residue, which is in close agreement to previous empirical2 and computational3 estimates of the same quantity. Furthermore, we find that all these proteins have a conformationally diverse transition state, with more than half of the conformational entropy of the unfolded state. In agreement with predictions from theory and computer simulations, the transition state signals the change from a regime dominated by loss in conformational entropy to one driven by the gain in stabilization free energy (i.e., including protein interactions and solvation effects). Moreover, the height of the barrier is determined by how much stabilization free energy is realized at that point, which is related to the relative contribution of local versus non‐local interactions. A remarkable observation is that the fraction of conformational entropy per residue that is present in the transition state is very similar for the six proteins in this study. Based on this commonality, we propose that the observed change in thermodynamic regime is connected to a change in the pattern of structure formation: from one driven by formation of pairwise interactions to one dominated by coupling of the networks of interactions involved in forming the protein core. In this framework, the barrier to two‐state folding is crossed when the folding protein reaches a “critical native density” that allows expulsion of remaining interstitial water and consolidation of the core. The principle of critical native density should be general for all two‐state proteins, but can accommodate different folding mechanisms depending on the particularities of the structure and sequence. Proteins 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.