bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A phase 1b study of sotorasib combined with panitumumab as second-line treatment of KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Authors: Yaeger Rona , Langer Corey J. , Ruffinelli Jose Carlos , Fakih Marwan , Furqan Muhammad , Machiels Jean-Pascal H. , Saportas Yaneth , Nolte-Hippenmeyer Jane , Chan Emily , Xia Caihong , Masuishi Toshiki 
Published: January 2024

128 Background: In the CodeBreaK 101 phase 1b study, sotorasib, a KRASG12C inhibitor, plus panitumumab, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, showed acceptable safety and promising efficacy for patients with chemorefractory KRAS G12C–mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: an objective response rate (ORR) of 30% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.7 months were observed. Here, we evaluated sotorasib plus panitumumab in the second-line (2L) setting. Methods: CodeBreaK 101 (NCT04185883) subprotocol H includes dose exploration and expansion in multiple cohorts. Patients eligible for the 2L sotorasib plus panitumumab dose-expansion cohort were KRASG12C inhibitor–naïve and had received no more than one prior regimen for metastatic disease. Patients received oral sotorasib at 960 mg daily and IV panitumumab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included efficacy endpoints. Results: As of May 23, 2023, this cohort was fully enrolled; all 20 patients (50% female, median age 60.0 years) were included in this analysis. All patients received fluoropyrimidine-based treatment and 17 (85%) patients received oxaliplatin-based treatment as first-line therapy. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 19 (95%) patients. The most common any-grade TRAEs were dermatitis acneiform (60%), dry skin (55%), pruritus (45%), and hypomagnesemia (30%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 4 (20%) patients and included fatigue, hypomagnesemia, decreased appetite, and rash (5% each). No TRAEs were grade ≥4 or resulted in treatment discontinuation or deaths. Confirmed ORR was 30% (95% CI: 11.9, 54.3). The disease control rate was 90% (95% CI: 68.3, 98.8). At a median follow-up of 11.3 months (95% CI: 5.6, not estimable), median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI: 4.3, 14.1). Conclusions: This is the first report of safety and efficacy from a 2L cohort evaluating a KRASG12C inhibitor plus an anti-EGFR antibody in KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. The toxicities of sotorasib plus panitumumab were consistent with the expected safety profile of the individual agents and with that reported previously for this combination; the ORR was similar to that previously observed for this combination in a more chemorefractory population. The ORR and PFS of sotorasib plus panitumumab compare favorably to current standard approaches in the 2L treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04185883 .
Amivantamab monotherapy in relapsed/refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: OrigAMI-1, an open-label, phase 1b/2 study.
Authors: Oberstein Paul Eliezer , Moreno Victor , Raghav Kanwal Pratap Singh , Hong Yong Sang , Han Sae-Won , Su Yu-Li , Yuan Ying , Pietrantonio Filippo , Van Cutsem Eric , Eng Cathy , Curtin Joshua C , Chowdhury Sanjib , Bhattacharya Rianka , Maul Raymond Scott , Iwasawa Ryota , Schnepp Robert W. , Knoblauch Roland Elmar , Thayu Meena , Ho Gwo Fuang , Kim Han Sang 
Published: January 2024

135 Background: Amivantamab (ami), an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity, has shown preclinical activity in colorectal cancer (CRC) models. MET amplification is implicated in driving resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic CRC (mCRC). We hypothesize that dual, co-inhibition of EGFR and MET with ami could improve outcomes in relapsed/refractory mCRC. Methods: OrigAMI-1 (NCT05379595) is assessing the safety and efficacy of ami as monotherapy in patients (pts) with refractory mCRC in 3 separate cohorts (Table). Eligible pts were wild-type for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR ectodomain by ctDNA testing, without ERBB2/ HER2 amplification. Cohorts A and B included pts with left-sided mCRC without/with prior exposure to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, respectively, and cohort C included pts with right-sided mCRC. Safety population included all pts receiving the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; 1050 mg [1400 mg, ≥80kg]). Investigator-assessed response per RECIST v1.1 is reported for evaluable pts with post-baseline disease assessment(s) or who discontinued for any reason. Ami plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI is being explored in additional cohorts. Results: As of September 4, 2023, 93 pts were treated at RP2D; 89 were response evaluable (median follow-up: 4.4 mo). Median age was 60 years, 66% were male, and median prior lines of therapy were 2, with 94% receiving prior bevacizumab and 69% prior anti-EGFR therapy. Best timepoint responses were: Cohort A: 7/17, 41.2%; Cohort B: 13/54, 24.1%; Cohort C: 1/18, 5.6%. Disease control rates (DCR) were 88.2%, 72.2%, and 77.8% for Cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. Median duration of response (mDoR) for confirmed responders was 7.5 and 7.4 mo for Cohorts A and B, respectively. Treatment is ongoing for the responder in Cohort C. 10/13 responders (77%) remain on treatment. Preliminary biomarker data suggest ami may be active in alterations associated with anti-EGFR antibody resistance (eg, EML4-ALK fusion, PTEN). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were rash (84%) and infusion-related reactions (53%). No new safety signals were observed. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Ami monotherapy demonstrated promising, durable antitumor activity in refractory mCRC, including pts treated with prior anti-EGFR therapy and pts with right-sided disease. The safety profile of ami in mCRC is manageable and consistent with prior NSCLC experience. Clinical trial information: NCT05379595 . [Table: see text]
Validation of a novel web-based application for hepatic arterial infusion floxuridine dosing.
Authors: Ellis Carleton Scott , Nutalapati Snigdha , Moss Jessica Jane , Barry-Hundeyin Mautin S. , Pandalai Prakash , Kim Joseph , Patel Reema Anil , Cavnar Michael J. 
Published: January 2024

15 Background: Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) floxuridine (FUDR) dosing is a complex, multifactorial process with weight-based dosing dependent on the fold change of aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin relative to reference values from preceding cycles and compounded over time. Given the complexity of dosing calculations and lack of experience with this treatment in community centers, HAI is typically administered only at tertiary oncology centers with limited access for rural disadvantaged patients. We developed an online tool to automate the dosing of FUDR to broaden safe and effective administration of HAI. Methods: The FUDR dosing algorithm developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center was digitalized as eDoseHAI, a novel multi-layer architecture web application tool featuring JavaScript (front-end), C# RESTful API (back-end) and Azure SQL server (data storage with Splunk data lake event registration). To validate this tool, manual dosing from patients who received ≥1 dose of HAI FUDR at our institution 6/2020-8/2023 was retrospectively compared to app-based dosing. Mismatch between app-based dosing and historical manual dosing was designated as dosing errors, excluding intentional adjustments based on physician discretion. Results: Internal validity was tested by entering records into eDoseHAI from 54 patients who received a total of 370 FUDR cycles (median 6; range 1-19). Ten patients (18.5%) were found to have unintentional dosing errors (e.g., delayed dose reductions) during treatment, impacting 52 cycles (14.1%). The median cycle at first error was 3 (range 2-6), impacting a median of 5 cycles (range 3-12). Dosing errors occurred in only 11.1% of the 45 patients supervised by a senior HAI physician, compared to 55.6% of the 9 patients supervised by three less experienced HAI physicians. Dosing accuracy improved over time; among the 14 patients on active HAI therapy, only 1 had an identified dosing error. eDoseHAI was able to reliably and accurately calculate dosing for all patients. Conclusions: HAI FUDR dosing is nuanced and complex, such that dosing errors occurred even with senior HAI oncologists. eDoseHAI is a web-based application tool designed to improve accuracy and thus safety of HAI dosing. We plan to further validate eDoseHAI using external data from an international HAI consortium, and to conduct a phase II clinical trial in which our team supervises FUDR dosing by community oncologists using eDoseHAI's supervisory mode with a goal to disseminate HAI therapy to disadvantaged rural patients who lack access.
Genomic alteration in sporadic adolescent and young adult-onset colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Korphaisarn Krittiya , Sakornsakolpat Phuwanat , Pongpaibul Ananya , Roothumnong Ekkapong , Thongnoppakhun Wanna , Akewanlop Charuwan , Pithukpakorn Manop 
Published: January 2024

154 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is increasing in adults younger than 50 years. This study evaluated genomic alteration in adolescent and young adult (AYA)-onset sporadic CRC patients who aged between 15 and 39 years. Methods: DNA from 90 archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples that histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma with proficient mismatch repair tumors at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) were extracted. Patients who clinically suspected familial adenomatous polyposis were excluded. Gene mutational analysis was performed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using an Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and compared with previous reported molecular data in adult-onset CRC from our group. Results: The top 5 mutations frequency observed were TP53, KRAS, FBXW7, PIK3CA, and SMAD4 mutations which were comparable to what reported in adult-onset CRC. However, FBXW7, PIK3CA, NOTCH1, FGFR3, ERBB2, and PTEN were reported more frequent in AYA group. No difference in number of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations among 2 groups. Table below shows key cancer genes mutation frequencies. Conclusions: This study is the comprehensive report hotspot mutations using NGS in sporadic AYA-onset sporadic CRC patients. The most commonly identified gene mutation frequencies among AYA-onset were similar to those reported in adult-onset, except for FBXW7, PIK3CA, NOTCH1, FGFR3, ERBB2, and PTEN mutations that had a slightly higher frequency. Further studies on larger sample set for genetic and epigenetic landscape are required. [Table: see text]
Comparison of colorectal cancer (CRC) characteristics across genetic ancestries: Implications for early cancer detection (ECD).
Authors: Myer Parvathi , Srinivasan Preethi , Bristow Sara L. , Krinshpun Shifra , Solari Omid , Aushev Vasily N. , Jurdi Adham A , Liu Minetta C. , Mitchell Breeana L. , Aleshin Alexey , Reiter Johannes G. , Weitzel Jeffrey N. , Nakamura Yoshiaki , Yoshino Takayuki , Wall Jeffrey , Ioannidis Alexander , Bustamante Carlos 
Published: January 2024

164 Background: Blood-based ECD has the potential to reduce mortality rates by improving strategies for, adoption of, and adherence to screening. A deeper understanding of the cancer genomic landscape across genetic ancestries will aid comparable detection performance across a broad population. We evaluated the mutational landscape in patients with CRC across genetic ancestries. Methods: 16,080 de-identified patients with stage I-IV CRC who had personalized, tumor-informed commercial ctDNA testing (Signatera) based on whole exome sequencing (WES) were included. Genetic ancestry determined via supervised local ancestry inference (pmid36042219) included African (AFR), East Asian (EAS), European (EUR), Latino (LAT), and South Asian (SAS). Patients assigned to a single ancestry were included (except SAS due to small cohort size). Somatic single nucleotide variants called from WES were used for mutational signature inference. EUR was the reference group for standard statistical tests with corrections for multiple hypothesis testing. Results: A single genomic ancestry was assigned for 16,257 (99.2%) patients (AFR n=1697, 10%; EAS n=2247, 14%; EUR n=10,526, 64%; LAT n=1291, 1%; SAS n=184, 1%). Across AFR, EAS, EUR, and LAT, approximately half of patients were male (range, 47-54%) and most were aged >50 years. Microsatellite instability (MSI) rates were significantly higher in EUR (14.5%) v AFR (11%, p<0.001), EAS (8%, p<0.001), and LAT (11%, p=0.002). Compared to EUR (range 0.027-875.1 mut/Mb), the distribution of TMB was significantly higher in EAS (0.304-906.2 mut/Mb, p<0.001) and lower in LAT (0.053-476.7 mut/Mb, p<0.001). The POLE hyper-mutator signature was seen in 1.2% of all patients and in 7.6% of all hyper-mutated cases. Patients with the POLE signature were less common in EUR (1.1%) v AFR (2%, p=0.001). There were significant differences in the frequency of driver mutations in APC, BRAF, KRAS, TP53, and PIK3CA between EUR and the other ancestry groups in both MSI and MSS tumors (Table). Median exposure levels to alkylation were higher in EAS v EUR. Conclusions: These data confirm previous results in AFR populations, and reveal novel differences in the EAS and LAT populations. Findings from this study may provide information for developing risk stratification and prevention strategies for the early detection of cancer and provide rationale for precision treatment based on ancestry. [Table: see text]
The mechanistic study of cancer-associated adipocytes promoting colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis via FKBP5/UCP1-mediated lipid metabolism reprogramming.
Authors: Zhang Yue , Huang Chengzhi , Yao Xueqing 
Published: January 2024

178 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent malignant tumor globally, with peritoneal metastasis as a significant late-stage dissemination pathway, severely impacting patient prognosis. Recent research increasingly suggests the critical role of lipid metabolism within the tumor microenvironment in tumor progression. Cancer associated adipocytes (CAAs), a vital component, contribute to tumor progression, yet the exact molecular mechanisms remain unclear. We aim to explore the role of CAAs in CRC peritoneal metastasis and their specific regulatory mechanisms. Methods: In this study, we analyzed clinical samples from 312 CRC patients to assess the expression levels of FKBP5 and UCP1 proteins in tumor-adjacent tissues. Purified exosomes from co-cultured adipocytes and tumor cells, along with exosomes from ordinary tumor cells, underwent miRNA profiling via sequencing to evaluate exosomal miR-200a-3p expression. We established FKBP5 stable knockdown (FKBP5-/-) transgenic mouse models, organotypic co-culture models, and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Through experiments involving metabolomics, mass spectrometry, immunoprecipitation, western blotting, and qPCR, we investigated the role of the miR-200a-3p/FKBP5/PPARγ/UCP1 signaling pathway in CAAs in CRC peritoneal metastasis. Results: After co-culturing adipocytes and tumor cells, we observed brown adipocyte differentiation, resulting in significant downregulation of FKBP5 protein expression. FKBP5 exhibited a strong association with UCP1 expression. Tumor cells highly expressed miR-200a-3p, released via exosomes into the tumor microenvironment and internalized by adipocytes. Within adipocytes, miR-200a-3p orchestrated metabolic reprogramming via the FKBP5/PPARγ/UCP1 pathway, inducing brown adipocyte differentiation, generating CAAs. CAAs released FFAs, promoting tumor peritoneal metastasis by activating tumor cell surface G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Conversely, miR-200a-3p inhibition in tumor cells yielded opposing effects. In a spontaneous mouse model of colorectal cancer using azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sulfate sodium salt (DSS), FKBP5-/- mice exhibited increased brown adipocyte content in the tumor microenvironment, along with notably higher spontaneous colorectal tumor numbers and sizes compared to wild-type mice. Conclusions: This study elucidates the pivotal role of CAAs in the peritoneal metastasis of CRC, confirming the regulatory role of the FKBP5/UCP1 pathway-mediated lipid metabolism reprogramming in this process. These findings offer a fresh perspective for further exploration of the molecular mechanisms underlying CRC peritoneal metastasis, and provide a theoretical foundation for the identification of novel therapeutic targets.
High-resolution transcriptional signature to predict survival benefit in colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi) independent of RAS/BRAF mutation status or tumor sidedness.
Authors: Thota Ramya , Yeatman Timothy , Gandhi Nishant , Yang Mingli , Schell Michael , Pflieger Lance , Loboda Andrey , Nebozhyn Michael , Elliott Andrew , Xiu Joanne , Sledge George W. , Khushman Moh'd M. , Lou Emil , Goel Sanjay , Pledger Warren Jack ,   Caris
Published: January 2024

203 Background: Cetuximab (CTX) and Panitumumab (PMB) therapies directed at EGFR have been restricted to left-sided CRC harboring wild-type KRAS ( KRASWT), limiting their utility. Approximately 50% of mCRC fail to respond to EGFRi, thus identification of predictive biomarkers is an unmet need. Here we evaluate a CTX sensitivity score (CTX-S) that we previously reported (Yang M. et al., 2019), in a large, real-world population of RAS/BRAF mutant vs wild-type and in right- vs left-sided tumors. Methods: CTX/PMB-treated CRC specimens (n=1124) with clinical outcomes, NextGen Sequencing of DNA (592-gene panel or whole exome sequencing) and RNA (whole transcriptome sequencing) were tested at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). 1097 specimens were MSS as determined by IHC of MMR proteins and/or NGS. Association of CTX-S with RAS/BRAF mutation and tumor sidedness was performed in MSS tumors. Tumors with likely pathogenic mutations in KRAS, NRAS or BRAF were considered as RASMUT /BRAFMUT, or RASWT /BRAFWT if no mutation was detected for each gene. Samples were stratified based on CTX-S quintiles. Survival on EGFRi was calculated from the initiation of EGFRi to last contact using Kaplan-Meir method. Results: Higher CTX-S quintiles were significantly associated with longer survival on EGFRi in RAS/BRAF wild-type as well as -mutant subpopulations. Similar results were seen in left- vs. right-sided tumors (Table). Higher CTX-S quintiles were associated with a survival benefit in all CMS classes but CMS2; however, the vast majority of CMS2 tumors (460/467) were among the top 3 CTX-S quintiles. As the median survival among the top 3 quintiles was ~2-fold higher than the bottom 2 quintiles, we used stratification by the 40th percentile for the genomic analysis. CTX-S >40th percentile was associated with an increased prevalence in APC (91 vs 47%) and TP53 (93 vs 76%) mutations and decreased prevalence in BRAF (6 vs 32%), SMAD4 (8 vs 19%), RNF43 (1 vs 12%) and ATM (2 vs 5%) mutations (all q<0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that CTX-S may predict longer survival on EGFRi, surprisingly independent of RAS/BRAF mutation status as well as tumor sidedness. Patients with high CTX-S had increased prevalence of CMS2 and harbored more APC and TP53 mutations. A strong EGFRi biomarker would likely expand the utility of EGFRi to right-sided tumors and possibly to RASMUT tumors. Further validation of these biomarkers in a prospective clinical trial is warranted and could change our current standard of care for CRC.[Table: see text]
A quality-adjusted time without symptoms and toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis comparing nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N+I) or nivolumab plus chemotherapy (N+CT) versus CT in patients (pts) with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): CheckMate 648.
Authors: Chau Ian , Bridgewater John A , Wyrwicz Lucjan , Greenwood Mike , Blum Steven I. , Moreno-Koehler Alejandro , Worthy Gill , Taylor Fiona , Davis Catherine , Chen Clara 
Published: January 2024

251 Background: In CheckMate 648, pts with advanced ESCC treated with first-line N+I or N+CT had significantly longer overall survival (OS) vs CT and maintained quality of life (QoL) with no new safety signals. Here we compare between-treatment differences in quality-adjusted survival using a Q-TWiST analysis in all randomized pts (29-month minimum follow-up). Methods: Survival time was partitioned into 3 health states: toxicity (TOX), time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity (TWiST), and relapse (REL). TOX was defined as time spent with all-cause grade 3/4 adverse events after randomization, prior to disease progression. TWiST was defined as time prior to REL where pts did not experience TOX. REL was defined as time between disease progression and death, or the last known date alive. Mean duration of time in each state was calculated for each treatment group using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Utility values from the 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire were used to adjust the time spent within each health state for QoL and to calculate Q-TWiST as the utility-weighted sum of the mean health state durations. Bootstrapping (500 samples) was used to estimate time in each health state and to compare mean Q-TWiST estimates between treatments. A between-group difference in Q-TWiST of 5 weeks was prespecified as being clinically important (defined as 10% of OS; based on a median OS in CT group of 10.7 months). Sensitivity analyses were conducted using different combinations of prespecified utility weights for each health state. Results: 970 pts were randomized 1:1:1 to N+I (n = 325), N+CT (n = 321), or CT (n = 324) and included in the Q-TWiST analysis. Median duration of follow-up for survivors was 155 weeks. Mean time in each health state was significantly longer for pts treated with N+I or N+CT compared to CT (Table). Between-group differences in Q-TWiST score were considered clinically important: 5.7 weeks (95% CI 5.5–6.0) favoring N+I vs CT and 7.6 weeks (95% CI 7.4–7.9) favoring N+CT vs CT. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. Conclusions: In CheckMate 648, pts with unresectable advanced ESCC treated with N+I or N+CT had significantly longer OS compared with those treated with CT. Quality-adjusted survival using Q-TWiST also significantly favored N+I and N+CT compared to CT alone. Pts treated with N+I and N+CT not only experienced increased survival time, but also better QoL during their survival time. Clinical trial information: NCT03143153 . [Table: see text]