bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Advanced pancreatic cancer outcomes and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic: The experience of an academic cancer center.
Authors: Adams-Carey Christian , Shepard Anna , Moreland Katie , Olowokure Olugbenga Olanrele , Latif Tahir , Rojan Adam , Pan Jianmin , Rai Shesh , Sohal Davendra 
Published: January 2024

626 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic increased all-cause mortality and disrupted healthcare delivery in the United States. Interruptions in cancer screening and surveillance because of the pandemic resulted in delayed diagnosis, diagnosis at later stages, and worse cancer-related outcomes. However, the effect of COVID-19 on pancreatic cancer outcomes has not been reported. This study aimed to investigate this question. Methods: We studied consecutive patients with unresectable and metastatic pancreatic cancer treated at the University of Cincinnati Cancer Center. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: from January 2018 to December 2019 (pre-COVID) and from January of 2020 to December of 2021 (during-COVID). Descriptive data on patient characteristics, ECOG performance status (PS), laboratory values, therapies, and mortality were obtained by pre- and during-COVID. The categorical variables were compared using the Pearson Chi-square test for contingency tables (or Fisher’s exact test when the expected frequency within any cell was less than 5 in the contingency table), and the t-test or ANOVA was used for continuous variables. For overall survival time, the Kaplan-Meier curves were compared between pre- and during-COVID using log rank test. We fitted univariable Cox proportional-hazards model for each interest variable, and the multivariable Cox models, which includes only significant variables. Results: There were 81 and 64 patients in the pre- and during-COVID cohorts, respectively. Patients diagnosed during COVID were more likely to be female, have better PS, have higher proportion of alcohol use, and were more likely to receive 5-FU-based (compared with gemcitabine-based) chemotherapy upfront. There was no overall survival difference between the two cohorts. A Cox proportional hazards model showed that PS at diagnosis, history of chronic pancreatitis, any chemotherapy compared to no chemotherapy, serum albumin prior to initial chemotherapy, and body mass index at time of diagnosis were associated with survival. Conclusions: We observed no difference in overall survival in patients diagnosed with advanced stage pancreatic cancer during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the two prior years. While some differences were observed between patient groups and treatment selection before and during the pandemic, a concerted effort to maintain cancer care appears to have minimized the impact of the pandemic. Further analyses on patients undergoing treatment are being conducted.
Comparison between different therapeutic sequences in patients affected by metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Pretta Andrea , Giampieri Riccardo , Nichetti Federico , Ziranu Pina , Lupi Alessio , Moledda Giusy , Andena Paola , Felicetti Cristiano , D'Agata Alessandra Pia , Pircher Chiara Carlotta , Codipietro Claudia , Rota Simone , Rizzo Daiana , Sanna Giorgia , Lai Eleonora , Puzzoni Marco , Pusceddu Valeria , Berardi Rossana , Niger Monica , Scartozzi Mario 
Published: January 2024

674 Background: The first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer involves different therapeutic regimens, among them, mFOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nabpaclitaxel. However, it remains to be clarified which sequence might correlate with better outcomes. The aim of our work was to evaluate which sequence leads to better overall survival in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 358 patients affected by stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from 3 different Italian Institutions. Patients received mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nabpaclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy, followed by a second-line non-cross-resistant chemotherapy (gemcitabine or fluoropyrimidine-based combinations). Survival distribution was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves. The primary endpoint was median overall survival. Statistical analysis was performed with MedCalc package. Results: The median age was 66 (± 9), 195 (54,4%) were male and 163 (45,6%) were female. 292 (81,5%) patients start gemcitabine plus nabpaclitaxel as first line treatment, while 66 (18,5%) patients start mFOLFIRINOX first-line therapy. No statistically significant differences in terms of mOS were observed between the two mFOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nabpaclitaxel groups: 16 versus 15 months, respectively, p = 0,2). No significant differences were found in terms of mPFS either: 7 versus 8 months, respectively, p = 0,3). Conclusions: The results of our retrospective study showed no statistically significant survival advantage between the sequences starting with mFOLFIRINOX or with gemcitabine-nabpaclitaxel. Further studies will be necessary to establish the effectiveness of new therapeutic schemes to be introduced into clinical practice in order to define a better therapeutic algorithm.
Early molecular assessment to predict prognosis in patients who respond to chemotherapy on initial imaging in pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Watanabe Fumiaki , Suzuki Koichi , Rikiyama Toshiki 
Published: January 2024

683 Background: It is helpful to predict early the response to anticancer drugs in non-resectable solid tumors. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) helps predict prognosis in patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer who have received first-line FFX or GnP therapy and have responded to treatment (CR, PR, SD groups) on initial imaging. Methods: A total of 61 patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer treated with FFX (N=22) and GnP (N=39) as first-line therapy were included in the study. Before and after chemotherapy treatment (median 42 days, after two courses), KRAS-mutated ctDNA was measured using droplet digital PCR with CA19-9. We defined the Responder group as those with CR, PR, or SD other than PD on initial imaging and the molecular assessment as the change in KRAS-mutated ctDNA before and after treatment. (1) No appearance of KRAS-mutated ctDNA before and after treatment was defined as molecular negative (mNT); (2) disappearance of KRAS-mutated ctDNA or decrease in copy number after treatment was defined as molecular response (mR); (3) new appearance of KRAS-mutated ctDNA or increase in copy number after treatment was defined as molecular progressive disease (mPD). We investigated whether the increase or decrease of CA19-9 before and after treatment (Increase group, decrease group) and the molecular assessment were useful as prognostic factors in the Responder group. Results: Male: female = twenty-nine: thirty-two. There were fourteen patients in the locally advanced group and forty-seven patients in the distant metastatic group, both of whom were considered non-resectable. Thirty-eight patients received any second-line treatment. The prognosis of fourteen patients with PD on initial imaging was significantly worse than that of the Responder group (N=47) (Responder: PD=18.4: 9.2 months, p=0.000108). The molecular assessment in the responder group showed 30 patients in mNT group, 10 patients in mR group, and 7 patients in mPD group. The MST was 21.7, 13.2, and 13.2 months. In univariate analysis, increased CA19-9 (Increase group) and mPD were associated with worse prognosis (Increase: Decrease=13.6: 18.4 months, p=0.0487), (mPD: mNT+mR=13.2: 21.7 months, p=0.0194) and the only independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis was mPD (Hazard ratio=3.005, p=0.0361). Conclusions: The prognosis of patients with molecular negative or molecular response after chemotherapy is relatively good (MST; 21.7 months), and efforts should be made to continue GnP and FFX. In contrast, the prognosis of patients with molecular progressive disease in the responder group is worse. Therefore, strict follow-up and change of anticancer drugs, including palliation, should be considered.
CEACAM6 and IFITM3 as potential biomarkers for pelareorep in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Authors: Noonan Anne M. , David Jason , Hays John L. , Chen James Lin 
Published: January 2024

684 Background: Pelareorep (P) is a proprietary formulation of live, replication-competent, naturally occurring Reovirus Type 3 Dearing strain. We previously performed a phase II trial of P with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (Pxl) vs C and Pxl alone in metastatic PDAC (NCT01280058). Although P did not improve progression-free survival compared to C and Pxl alone, some exceptional durable responses were seen in the P arm. Low levels of carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6) mRNA expression were associated with prolonged PFS in P-treated pts (p=0.05) and there was a 3.3 times higher fold change in Interferon-inducible transmembrane protein 3 (IFITM3) expression in the pts doing poorly versus responders (nominal p<0.05) in P arm. Here we investigate mechanisms of resistance to P infection mediated through CEACAM6 and IFITM3 in a panel of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell lines. Methods: Prior studies noted CEACAM6 and IFITM3 may restrict cell entry of certain enveloped viruses. CEACAM6 and IFITM3 protein levels were measured in PDAC cell lines using Western blot. Flow cytometry was used to assess P infectivity. We have generated multiple knockdowns of CEACAM6 and IFITM3 in PDAC cell lines to determine changes in P infectivity and other inflammatory signalling pathways. Live cell imaging was used to assess cell viability. Results: Basal expression of CEACAM6 was measured in a panel of 4 PDAC cells (PANC10.5, HPAFII, BxPC3, CFPAC1). Panc10.05 had low basal expression nor could expression be induced by 24hr P infection. All other cell lines showed moderate to high basal expression that was inducible. P infectivity at 24hrs was significantly higher in Panc10.05 cells compared to high CEACAM6 expressing cell lines. There was varying basal expression of IFITM3, however all cell lines showed IFITM3 induction when exposed to P. Of the 3 cell lines that also expressed high levels of CEACAM6 (HPAFII, CFPAC1, BxPC3), low basal expression of IFITM3 was strongly associated with increased sensitivity to P infection and decreased viability at 72hrs, which could be induced by knockdown of IFITM3 in high expressing cell lines. Neither C or Pxl altered levels of CEACAM6 or IFITM3 in any of the four cell lines. Conclusions: High CEACAM6 and IFITM3 play a role in P viral infectivity across multiple pancreatic cell lines, confirming results obtained in translational datasets. Further analysis is ongoing to elucidate mechanism and identify pathways to alter expression of CEACAM6 and IFITM3 and enhance P infectivity in future trials.
Molecular characterization of small extracellular vesicles in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiation (SBRT).
Authors: Paluri Ravi Kumar , Su Yixin , Sing Sangeetha , Williams Grant Richard , Gbolahan Olumide B. , Manne Upender , Deep Gagan 
Published: January 2024

685 Background: Currently, pancreatic cancer (PanC) is one of the serious gastrointestinal diseases, and more than 90% of the patients die within five years of diagnosis. Therefore, to improve PanC-related mortality, new therapeutic and diagnostic/prognostic measures are urgently needed. In this substudy, we examined the usefulness of plasma small extracellular vesicles (sEV) to discover molecular biomarkers associated with treatment response and overall survival from the plasma samples collected on a prospective clinical trial assessing the efficacy of SBRT following chemotherapy in pancreatic cancers (NCT03600623). Methods: PanCpatients (n=22) with locally advanced and borderline inoperable disease were recruited at the University of Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Center. They were administered either FOLFIRINOX (5-FU, folinic acid, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) or paclitaxel (gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel) for 2 months followed by SBRT (33 Gray in 5 fractions). The primary objective of this single-center pilot study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of this treatment regimen. Further, blood was collected at baseline and, at the end of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. sEV were isolated from archived plasma samples by an established ultracentrifugation method and characterized for size and concentration by nanoparticle tracking analyses (NTA), shape and size by transmission electron microscope (TEM), and surface expression of exosomal tetraspanin markers (CD63, CD9, and CD81) and a PanC marker (CA19-9) by nano-flow cytometry. Lastly, sEV in longitudinal plasma samples were characterized for the expression of specific PanC-related miRNAs (miR196a-5p, miR155-5, miR194-5p, miR301-3p, miR21-5p, miR1246, and miR34a-5p) by real time-PCR (RT-PCR). Results: Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel followed by SBRT were safe and well tolerated by most patients. NTA data showed that the ultracentrifugation method yielded highly pure sEV (with average diameter of <200 nm) from archived baseline and longitudinal plasma samples. TEM analysis further confirmed the shape and size of the isolated sEV. Nano-flow cytometry showed the expression of exosomal markers, CD63, CD9, and CD81, as well as PanC marker CA19-9 on the surfaces of sEV. The expression of various PanC-related miRNAs in sEV was heterogenous and correlated with corresponding clinical parameters, including treatment response and overall survival. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with SBRT is safe and tolerable regimen to treat patients with locally advanced and borderline PanC. Further, sEV in the plasma of PanC patients could serve as useful prognostic and predictive markers.
New cutoff of CA19-9 values for predicting pancreatic cancer using liquid biopsy.
Authors: Hasebe Ryuji , Watanabe Fumiaki , Suzuki Koichi , Rikiyama Toshiki 
Published: January 2024

692 Background: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the biomarker most commonly used as a diagnostic aid for treatment efficacy and survival prediction for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the cutoff value of CA19-9 is still being discussed. Instead, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been reported as a new biomarker for PDAC. Our previous study showed a correlation between CA19-9 levels and KRAS mutated ctDNA in the blood of PDAC patients. Based on this correlation, we validated an appropriate cutoff value for CA19-9 before surgery. Methods: We monitored continuously CA19-9 values and KRAS-mutated ctDNAs in unresectable PDAC patients (N=22) who underwent chemotherapy in 2015 to 2017. KRAS mutation in tumor tissues and mutated circulating tumor DNA (MctDNA) in plasma was analyzed for mutations by digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in 22 patients with pancreatic cancer. KRAS point mutation in plasma was analyzed, according to KRAS point mutation in tissue (ex. 12D, 12V). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was plotted to determine new cutoff of CA19-9 value that emerged KRAS-mutated ctDNA in the longitudinal monitoring. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of 60 patients who underwent surgery for resectable PDAC in 2005 to 2013 were analyzed according to many survival variables including new cutoff of CA19-9 value and median CA19-9 before operation. Results: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 949.7 U/mL of CA19-9 as the cutoff value corresponding to the presence of KRAS mutated ctDNA. The median value of CA19-9 was 221.1 U/mL. Subsequently, these values were verified for their prognostic values of RFS and OS in 60 patients who underwent surgery in 2005 to 2013. Multivariate analysis revealed that 949.7 U/mL of CA19-9 was an independent risk factor for RFS and OS in these patients (P = 0.010 and = P = 0.001, respectively), along with lymph node metastasis( P = 0.017 and P = 0.008), unlike the median CA19-9 level (P = 0.210 and P = 0.150). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that preoperative 949.7 U/mL ≥ CA19-9 may be associate with poor prognosis in PDAC. In summary, our study demonstrated, for the first time, that the adjusted cutoff value of CA19-9 was an important biomarker for the prediction of recurrence and prognosis in patients with resected PDAC. Patients with high levels of CA19-9 before surgery had a higher risk of recurrence and poorer prognosis than those with low levels of CA19-9, therefore they may have benefitted more from drug treatment than surgical intervention. Nevertheless, appropriate clinical decision-making for patients with high CA19-9 levels should be confirmed in future clinical trials. Although our study results should be interpreted within the study limitations and further examinations are required to draw a definitive conclusion, we believe that it clarifies the selection of patients with PDAC.
Inter-reader variability of imaging biomarkers for therapeutic response in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Heiselman Jon Stanley , Horvat Natally , Agridag-Upcinar Burcin , Yildirim Onur , Ecker Brett Logan , O'Reilly Eileen Mary , Drebin Jeffrey A. , Balachandran Vinod P. , Kingham T. Peter , D'Angelica Michael Ian , Soares Kevin , Do Richard K. G. , El Homsi Maria , Jarnagin William R. , Wei Alice Chia-Chi , Chakraborty Jayasree 
Published: January 2024

700 Background: Indeterminate borders of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can impair reliability of lesion annotation in imaging assessment of therapeutic response (TR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT). Previous work showed that longitudinal image registration algorithms can track treatment-related changes and produce quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIB) for TR that predict overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). We compare inter-reader agreements of these biomarkers against conventional RECIST and tumor volume QIB. Methods: N=30 patients enrolled in a Phase II clinical trial comparing outcomes of a NAT regimen were retrospectively analyzed. In baseline and restaging CT, whole pancreas and tumor segmentations and tumor diameters were annotated by 2 expert attending radiologists and 2 novice radiology fellows. For each reader, percent change in tumor diameter (RECIST score), percent change in tumor volume (ΔV), and difference in ratio of tumor burden to pancreas volume (ΔB) were computed as QIB for TR across the NAT interval via two approaches: image registration of the baseline tumor region of interest, and direct segmentation of the PDAC lesion in baseline and restaging images. Inter-reader agreements of RECIST, ΔV, and ΔB QIB from both approaches were compared via concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Associations with OS and RFS were compared over 5-year follow-up via Harrell’s C-index. Results: Among expert radiologists, RECIST score CCC was 0.77 [95% CI: 0.59-0.88], whereas image registration QIB CCC values were significantly higher (ΔV: 0.95 [0.90-0.98], p=0.002; ΔB: 0.93 [0.86-0.97], p=0.014). ΔV and ΔB QIB measured by direct tumor segmentation had significantly lower CCC than by image registration (p<0.001). Among novice readers, image registration QIB (ΔV: 0.83 [0.67-0.91], ΔB: 0.70 [0.48-0.84]) produced higher agreement than RECIST (0.26 [-0.17-0.61]; p=0.002 and p=0.035), with CCC more similar to expert readers. While image registration QIB did not differ from RECIST in association with RFS, registration-based QIB predicted OS with significantly higher C-index (ΔV: 0.58 [0.56-0.60], p<0.001; ΔB: 0.64 [0.62-0.66], p<0.001) than RECIST (0.50 [0.45-0.55]) among experts. Conclusions: Longitudinal registration of the pancreas yields more consistent QIB for PDAC TR with stronger association to OS outcomes than RECIST. These registration-based QIB aim to advance PDAC management by improving patient-specific discrimination of TR after NAT. [Table: see text]
Tumor immune microenvironment of KRAS G12C mutated pancreatic cancer as compared to other mutations and non-cancer pancreata.
Authors: Sahai Vaibhav , Gunchick Valerie , Paul Simi , Enzler Thomas , Zalupski Mark , Frankel Timothy 
Published: January 2024

704 Background: KRAS G12C mutation occurs in approximately 1% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). KRAS G12C inhibitors have a reported response rate of 21-33% in patients with previously treated advanced PDA. KRAS is a known modulator of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) and a greater understanding of the TME in KRAS G12C as compared to other mutations is crucial for developing rational therapeutic combination strategies in PDA. Methods: We performed multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) on tissue obtained from patients with histologically confirmed PDA (KRAS G12C n=8; other mutations n=108) and normal pancreas (n=38). Serial staining was performed using antibodies against CD3, CD8, CD163, FoxP3 and PanCK for simple and complex phenotyping as well as spatial analyses in the TME. After tyramide based signal amplification, the slides were imaged at 20x magnification using the Mantra Quantitative Pathology workstation. Images were analyzed using inForm Cell Analysis software (Akoya Biosciences). All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 13.2.0. Differences in phenotype, distances, and engagement were evaluated by 2-tailed Student’s t test or ANOVA. Results: Patients with KRAS G12C mutation had a median age of 70 (45-73) years of which majority (n=5, 62.5%) were men with advanced stage at diagnosis (n=6; 75%). The median overall survival is not yet reached (n=5, alive) after a median follow-up time of 14.4 months through reverse censoring methodology. When examining cellular infiltration, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte cells were significantly more abundant in the G12C TME compared to the cancer and non-cancer controls (p <0.01). Additionally, the relative frequency of CD4+ and Tregs (CD3+/CD8-/FoxP3+) were also significantly higher in G12C (p<0.01). The percentage of CD163+ antigen presenting cells (APCs) out of all cells was significantly higher in G12C (p<0.01) while the percentage of non-functional APCs (PDL1+/CD163+) of all APCs was significantly higher in G12C than cancer and non-cancer controls (p=0.03). In comparison, the PDL1+ epithelial cells were much lower in G12C TME (p<0.01). The cellular engagement and interaction data from the spatial analysis in the TME will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: We identified increased infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and APCs in PDA patients with KRAS G12C mutations relative to other mutations and non-cancerous pancreata. Furthermore, while all PDAs had elevated PD-L1 expression on APCs, KRAS G12C tumors had minimal expression on epithelial cells suggesting a mutation specific impact and a potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with G12C inhibitors.