The differential regulation of the circulating levels of the insulin‐like growth factors and their binding proteins (IGFBP) 1, 2 and 3 after elective abdominal surgery
Authors: Cotterill Andrew M. , Mendel Paul , Holly Jeffrey M. P. , Timmins A. Gerald , Camacho‐Hübner Cecilia , Hughes Sian Cwyfan , Ross Richard M. J. , Blum Werner F. , Langford Richard M. 
Published: November 2003

OBJECTIVES Patients undergoing abdominal surgery often suffer from morbidity associated with increased protein catabolism. Therapeutic recombinant human insulin‐like growth factor (rhIGF)‐I has been proposed as a means of reversing this process. As IGFBPs modulate the bioavailability of the IGFs, we have studied the changes in the circulating levels of these peptides during surgery.DESIGN Patients undergoing elective intestinal surgery were recruited prospectively. Blood samples were taken before, during and after surgery. Standard anaesthetic techniques were used.METHODS Twelve adults (aged 30–70 years; 9 female, 3 male) undergoing surgery were studied. Serum was taken before premedication (preop), end of surgery (end surg), 2 h, 6 h post surgery, on days 1–4, 7, 10 and 14, and on recovery at 6 weeks.MEASUREMENTS Serum IGF‐I, IGF‐II, IGFBP‐1, IGFBP‐2, IGFBP‐3, insulin and C‐peptide were measured by radioimmunoassay. IGFBP profiles were also assessed by Western ligand blot (WLB). Samples taken preop and at 2 days were separated by fast‐phase liquid chromatography (FPLC) using a Superose 12 column under neutral conditions (pH 7.4), and the fractions were analysed subsequently by WLB and immunoblot using a specific IGFBP‐3 antiserum.RESULTS IGF‐I fell rapidly during surgery from 170 ± 21 (preop) to 133 ± 14 μg/ll (end surg) (P < 0.05). The magnitude of this fall could not be explained by haemodilution. IGF‐I levels then fell further to a nadir of 103 ± 10 μg/l at day 4 (P < 0.05). IGF‐II fell from 580 ± 46 (preop) to 397 ± 38g/l (day 2). Both IGF‐I and IGF‐II recovered to preop levels at 6 weeks (205 ± 14 μg/l and 623 ± 30 μg/l respectively). IGFBP‐3 levels fell similarly from 4.46 ± 0.45 to 3.2 ± 0.3 mg/l (end surg) and to a nadir of 2.66 ± 0.19 mg/l at day 2. There was a close correlation between IGFBP‐3 levels and the sum of IGF‐I and IGF‐II levels before surgery (r = 0.9, P < 0.01) and this was maintained throughout the post‐operative period (mean correlation coefficient of 0.86 ± 0.02, P < 0.05). On days 2 and 3 there was a small but significant increase in the ratio between serum IGF‐I and IGFBP‐3 levels compared with the preop ratio (P < 0.05 and < 0.005, respectively).WLB demonstrated almost complete absence of IGFBP‐3 by day 2. This discrepancy between RIA and WLB analysis of IGFBP‐3 suggested the presence of IGFBP‐3 protease activity between days 1 and 4. This was confirmed by WLB and immunoblot analyses of samples taken 2 days after surgery. The decrease in IGFBP‐3 on WLB was shown to be associated with an increase in the proteolytically cleaved fragments of IGFBP‐3. These fragments following FPLC were detected in the high molecular weight fractions, suggesting that the fragments were still able to form the high molecular weight IGFBP‐3/ALS complex which is thought to form only when IGF is bound by IGFBP‐3.IGFBP‐1 levels rose during surgery (mean duration of surgery was 125 minute) from 18 ± 3 (preop) to 51 ± 12 μg/l (end surg) (P < 0.05). This rise in IGFBP‐1 paralleled increases in insulin from 7.3 ± 1.0 to 20.8 ± 7.5mU/l and glucose from 4.6 ± 0.3 to 8.7 ± 1.2 mmol/l. IGFBP‐1 levels then fell to basal values by 6 hours. IGFBP‐2, in contrast, fell slightly during surgery from 636 ± 14 to 599 ± 96 mg/l and then returned to basal levels by 6 hours.CONCLUSION After major surgery there are complex and diverse changes in the IGFs and IGFBPs. The effect of these changes on IGF bioavailability may significantly affect the therapeutic potential of IGF‐I in this setting.