Actions of an IGF-I-enhancing antibody on IGF-I pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution: increased IGF-I bioavailability
Authors: Hill R A , Flick-Smith H C , Dye S , Pell J M 
Published: December 2004

Abstract
We have previously demonstrated that a specific antiIGF-I antibody will enhance the growth-promoting activity of IGF-I in vivo (Stewart et al. 1993). Since the antibody had a modest affinity for IGF-I we suggested that the antiserum might protect IGF-I from degradation whilst maintaining it in a bioavailable form. The aim of this investigation was to test that hypothesis by determining the plasma clearance and tissue distribution of tracer IGF-I in the presence of the enhancing anti-IGF-I immunoglobulin (anti-IGF-I Ig) or non-immune immunoglobulin (NI Ig).
Dwarf rats were treated with saline, NI Ig or anti-IGF-I Ig for 4 days. On day 4, 125I-IGF-I (1·6 × 107 c.p.m.) was injected into the jugular vein and blood sampled over the next 330 min when the rats were killed; samples of liver, kidney and skeletal muscle were quickly dissected out. Mean plasma trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-precipitable 125I-IGF-I was always significantly greater (P<0·001 for each time point) from anti-IGF-I Ig rats versus the NI Ig or saline groups (which exhibited practically identical decay curves), implying increased binding capacity for IGF-I in the anti-IGF-I Ig rats. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by resolution of the decay curves using a two-phase model. The total clearance rate of 125I-IGF-I was significantly decreased (P<0·001) by almost twofold in the anti-IGF-I versus the two control groups, consistent with the increased binding capacity in the anti-IGF Ig rats. The half-lives of the faster-decaying phase were not significantly different between treatment groups but, surprisingly, that for the slower-decaying phase was significantly decreased (P<0·001) in the anti-IGF-I Ig rats versus the two control groups; this may reflect the low affinity of the anti-IGF-I Ig for IGF-I and its enhancing properties. The degradation of 125I-IGF-I was significantly decreased in animals receiving the anti-IGF-I Ig. In support of this, kidney TCA-precipitable radioactivity (c.p.m.) was sevenfold less (P<0·001) in the anti-IGF-I Ig groups versus the controls, indicative of reduced excretion. Liver TCAprecipitable radioactivity was increased (P<0·001) in the anti-IGF-I Ig rats, probably due to reticuloendothelial clearance of non-self antibodies; skeletal muscle TCAprecipitable radioactivity tended to increase in the antiIGF-I Ig group versus the controls which might indicate increased targeting of IGF-I to muscle. Size exclusion chromatography of plasma 15 and 120 min after administration of 125I-IGF-I demonstrated a broad peak of radioactivity with a molecular mass of 150–300 kDa in the anti-IGF-I Ig-treated rats, which was responsible for more than 90% of the eluted radioactivity. This suggests that: (1) 125I-IGF-I was bound to the anti-IGF-I Ig and might also be able to associate with IGFBPs or (2) the polyclonal antibody might recognise more than one antigenic site on IGF-1.
These data indicate that the anti-IGF-I Ig was protecting IGF-I from degradation, leading to a larger plasma pool of IGF-I but that IGF-I could be transferred readily from the plasma pool to tissues. We suggest that administration of IGF-I in conjunction with a binding molecule similar to the antibody described here could provide the basis for effective IGF-I treatment strategy.
Journal of Endocrinology (1997) 152, 123–130