One-year clinical outcomes and the impact of procedural configurations in patients with left atrial appendage occlusion
Authors: Gao C , Su F , Liu J Z , Zhang T T , Liu H T , Wang P , Garg S , Soliman O , Holmes D , Serruys P W , Tao L 
Published: November 2023

Abstract

Background
To evaluate the long-term clinical performance, the impact of procedural configurations and post-procedure medications in atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).

Methods
The RECORD study was a prospective, all-comers registry conducted in 39 Chinese centers that consecutively enrolling patients who received LAAO between 1st April 2019 and 31st October 2020 with minimum inclusion and exclusion criteria. Events including any death, any stroke, systemic embolism and bleeding event were collected at 1 year and adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee. Cox proportional hazard models with multivariable adjustments were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for each outcome.

Results
Of the 3,096 participants, 3,082 successfully received an LAAO implant and 3,013 (97.8%) completed the 1-year follow-up. Participants had a high risk of stroke (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4.0) and a moderate-to-high risk of bleeding (mean HAS-BLED score of 2.4). Local anesthetic was performed in 1,287 (41.6%) patients and fluoroscopy guidance in 492 (16.0%) patients. In 1295 (42.0%) cases, one-stage combination procedures of LAAO and radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation (CA) were performed. At 1 year, the composite ischemic endpoint of death, stroke, and systemic embolism occurred in 133 (4.51%) patients. Any life-threatening, disabling or major bleeding events occurred in 71 (2.36%) patients. There was no significant association between the type of anesthesia (general versus local), modality of image guidance (TEE, ICE, or fluoroscopy) with the ischemic or bleeding events. Combination procedures of LAAO plus CA was associated with a significantly lower rate of death, stroke, or systemic embolism than performing LAAO only (3.5% versus 5.2%, HRadjusted:0.69, 95%CI:0.48-0.98, P=0.041).
The commonest antithrombotic strategy was OAC | APT | APT (38.1%; corresponded to medication prescribed at discharge | 45 days | 6 months), followed by OAC | OAC | APT (27.0%). Compared with OAC | APT | APT, the OAC | OAC | APT group was associated with a higher risk of life-threatening, disabling or major bleeding (1.2% versus 2.5%, HRadjusted:0.50, 95%CI: 0.25-0.99, P=0.47); whereas the risk of death, stroke and SE was numerically similar (2.9% versus 3.0%, HRadjusted:1.05, 95%CI: 0.61-1.78, P=0.867). There was no significant difference between OAC | APT | APT and OAC+APT | APT | APT groups regarding ischemic events; however, in patients with HAS-BLED ≥ 3, OAC | APT | APT was associated with lower rates of life-threatening, disabling or major bleeding events (1.1% versus 4.8%, HRadjusted:4.55, 95%CI: 1.31-15.81, P=0.017).

Conclusion
In Chinese centers, patients with a WATCHMAN LAAO device had low rates of ischemic and bleeding events at 1 year. One-stage combination procedures of LAAO and catheter ablation was associated with a significantly lower rate of ischemic events than performing LAAO only.Procedural configurations to outcomesPost-LAAO antithrombotic medications