UBA1 Mutations Identify a Rare but Distinct Subtype of Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Authors: Sirenko Maria , Bernard Elsa , Creignou Maria , Domenico Dylan , Farina Andrea , Arango Ossa Juan E , Kosmider Olivier , Hasserjian Robert , Jädersten Martin , Germing Ulrich , Sanz Guillermo , van de Loosdrecht Arjan A. , Gurnari Carmelo , Follo Matilde Yung , Thol Felicitas , Zamora Lurdes , Pellagatti Andrea , Elias Harold K , Haase Detlef , Ganster Christina , Ades Lionel , Tobiasson Magnus , Palomo Laura , Della Porta Matteo Giovanni , Huberman Kety , Fenaux Pierre , Belickova Monika , Savona Michael R. , Klimek Virginia M. , Santos Fabio P. S. , Boultwood Jacqueline , Kotsianidis Ioannis , Santini Valeria , Sole Francesc , Platzbecker Uwe , Heuser Michael , Valent Peter , Finelli Carlo , Voso Maria Teresa , Shih Lee-Yung , Ogawa Seishi , Fontenay Michaela , Jansen Joop H. , Cervera Jose , Ebert Benjamin L. , Bejar Rafael , Greenberg Peter L. , Gattermann Norbert , Malcovati Luca , Cazzola Mario , Beck David B , Hellstrom Lindberg Eva , Papaemmanuil Elli 
Published: December 2023

Background
Mutations in UBA1 are associated with VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) syndrome, an adult-onset inflammatory disorder (Beck DB et al. NEJM 2020). Approximately 40% of VEXAS patients are also diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We previously profiled UBA1 p.M41 mutations in a select subset of the International Working Group for MDS (IWG-PM) cohort (Bernard E et al. NEJM Evid 2022) including 375 male patients lacking disease-defining mutations or established disease classification by WHO guidelines, and identified 28 patients (7%) with UBA1 p.M41T/V/L mutations (Cohort A, Sirenko M et al. Blood 2022). However, the prevalence and characteristics of UBA1 mutations in MDS have not been systematically evaluated in a representative MDS population.
Methods
We used targeted next-generation sequencing of the full UBA1 locus to profile 2027 diagnostic and treatment-naive MDS samples (Cohort B, 61% male) ascertained through the IWG-PM (Figure 1). Clinical associations of UBA1 mutations were evaluated and clinical history was reviewed for inflammatory conditions when available.
Results
In Cohort B, 35 UBA1 mutations in 34 (1.7%) patients were identified, of which 20 (0.97%) had likely pathogenic variants and 14 had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Likely pathogenic variants included 13 p.M41T/V/L mutation (variant allele fraction [VAF] range 0.013-0.94), and 7 non-p.M41 mutations where 6/7 had VAF&gt;0.35: 2 with p.S56F (VAF 0.87 and 0.93), 2 p.A478S (VAF 0.72 and 0.80), 2 p.S621C (VAF 0.80 and 0.82) and 1 p.Y55H (VAF 0.025). Three VUS were in female patients. 204 cases were profiled by both assays and of those, all 8 ddPCR positive cases were identified by NGS with concordant VAF (R2=0.999 p&lt;0.0001).
Integration of Cohort A and B (n=2,198) yielded 40 patients (all male, median age 72; range 44-89 years) with pathogenic UBA1 variants. The WHO 2016 classification (available for n=38 of 40) was MDS-SLD/MLD (25), MDS-EB1 (4), MDS-U (3), CMML (2), MDS-RS-MLD (1), aCML (1), MDS/MPN-RS-T (1), MDS/MPN-U (1). Patients had a median of 1 myeloid gene mutation in addition to UBA1 (range: 0-4) with most frequent co-occurring events in TET2 (n=12), DNMT3A (n = 10), ASXL1 (n=3), SF3B1 (n=3) and loss of the Y chromosome (n=5). In 8 patients with pathogenic UBA1 &gt; 2% VAF and co-occurring DNMT3A mutations, DNMT3A and UBA1 VAF were correlated (slope = 0.88, r = 0.87, p = 0.0005), suggesting that co-mutation may lead to clonal expansion. Conversely, TET2 co-mutations were either subclonal (n=4) or clonal (n=8) to UBA1.
Among patients with pathogenic UBA1 variants, the majority had IPSS-M Very-Low/Low risk (73% 27/37). In contrast, patients with VUS were more likely to have Moderate or High risk (64% 7/11).
Partial clinical history was available for 33 cases with pathogenic UBA1 variants. 50% (9/18) had inflammatory-rheumatic disease (IRD) including psoriatic arthritis, relapsing polychondritis, Sweet syndrome, bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia, ear chondritis, and rosacea. 3 patients had more than one IRD. 8 were treated for IRD with steroids (n=6) or methotrexate (n=2). 4 patients had MGUS. Other manifestations included vacuoles (4/8), thromboembolic disease (5/16), non-infection fever (5/14), weight loss (4/14), ocular symptoms (5/15), arthralgia (3/16), chondritis (5/15), and other inflammation (6/14). IRD diagnosis usually preceded MDS (average time 0.28 years; range 16.5 years prior to 1.4 years after).
Three patients transformed to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). One patient had a low VAF UBA1 p.M41V (0.0002 by ddPCR) and TET2, SF3B1, FLT3, and ASXL2 co-mutations at baseline. The second had UBA1 p.S56F (VAF 0.868) and a Chr 7q deletion. The third had VUS UBA1 p.R869L (VAF 0.222) and IRF1, NFE2 and RRAS co-mutations. Among the other UBA1-mutant patients that died or were censored after 1 year (n=37), none transformed to AML.
Conclusion
Within the large, representative, diagnostic and well-characterized IWG-PM MDS cohort, we find likely pathogenic UBA1 mutations in 1% of patients, with enrichment in male patients with few or no mutations in myeloid driver genes (7%). UBA1-mutant patients were predominantly IPSS-M low risk with a median of 1 additional mutation, usually in DNMT3A or TET2. UBA1 mutations may define a distinct subset of MDS and its recognition in future guidelines will improve the management of patients with MDS/VEXAS overlap.