bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Conservation Partnerships in Peru: The key to developing a Biodiversity Action Plan in a highly sensitive tropical environment
Authors: Alonso A. , Salinas L. , Mansell-Moullin D. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Biodiversity is a key issue for oil and gas operations working in sensitive environments in Latin America. There are an increasing array of tools and approaches to assist companies in better integrating biodiversity issues into decision making and management systems.
Multi-stakeholder partnerships are one important means of improving the management of biodiversity issues in exploration & production operations, reducing project risks in sensitive environments and also for increasing the understanding of stakeholder concerns and interests.
In early 2006, Repsol YPF Exploración Peru initiated a dialogue with the Smithsonian Institution Center for Conservation Education and Sustainability, an international scientific institution with headquarters in the United States. The aim of this dialogue was to explore innovative and sustainable ways to undertake exploratory seismic and drilling activities in a highly sensitive tropical forest ecosystem.
This early dialogue has developed into a long term partnership focused on Repsol YPF activities in Block 39 in northern Peru. The first phase of the partnership concluded in early 2007 following a review of all available scientific information, extensive consultation with key stakeholders and an identification of key biodiversity issues for the company. The recommendations from this phase were developed into a second phase which focused on the elaboration and implementation of a Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP), in line with IPIECA and OGP best practice guidelines (1).
This paper briefly describes the main elements which underpin the BAP, namely: 1/ a risks and opportunities analysis; 2/ base line biodiversity information; 3/ spatial mapping to identify critical habitats; 4/ collaborating with local authorities in regional planning; 5/ improving the quality of Environmental and Social Impacts Assessments (ESIA's); 6/ a "positive contribution to biodiversity conservation" plan; 7/ a local education plan and; 8/ an internal and external communication plan.
This paper focuses on the importance and benefits of working in partnerships from both a scientific organization promoting conservation of natural resources and an oil company during the exploration activities in a sensitive tropical environment.
Lessons From Our Global Emergency Response System
Authors: Buford Deena L. , Douglas Glen A. , Shallenberger Leba G. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Employees working for global corporations are often asked to leave their home base to attend meetings or to relocate for rotating or long-term expatriate assignments. All travelers are encouraged to avail themselves of a variety of pre-travel health services and information to assess their fitness to travel as well as prepare themselves for travel-related risks. Some travelers are required to visit one of our pre-travel health clinics to receive visa-related immunizations and prescriptions for company required malaria chemoprophylaxis. Unfortunately, many travelers, including those going to higher risk countries, may not heed the advice to consult with a health professional prior to travel. Our global Emergency MEdical Response System (EMERS) provides 24-hour medical advice and assistance to travelers ranging from telephone consultation to the medical evacuation of seriously ill individuals. We reviewed the EMERS calls resulting in medical evacuations from 2004-2006 to develop an overall picture of the underlying conditions which required evacuation. Most of the calls involved conditions that could not have been detected and/or mitigated during the pre-travel encounter. While pre-travel assessments remain useful for detecting and mitigating some high risk conditions, the benefit of pre-travel assessments in a healthy business traveler population may be in the dissemination of valuable information regarding travel-related hazards, the avoidance of such hazards and recognizing early symptoms. Additionaly, pre-travel visits can be used to instruct travelers how to access available emergency health care services. The pre-travel assessment needs to balance screening for high risk conditions with preventive services and health education for the best outcome. Conducting a periodic review of traveler/expatriate medical emergency line calls can help companies evaluate and refine their pre-travel health services to ultimately reduce the number and severity of adverse health events.
The Application of Inherently Safer Design Principles to the Design of a New Offshore Gas Processing Platform
Authors: Oakden M. M. , Eades M. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Post implementation of the UK Safety Case Regime, UK designers have tended to apply a risk based approach to the management of major accident hazards when designing new facilities. Although meeting the intent of goal setting, risk based design is subject to numerical uncertainty and can be challenged in terms of effectiveness in ensuring actual risks to personnel are as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). This paper describes how a project has taken a different approach using the principles of inherently safer design to concentrate on avoidance and prevention of major hazards.
The vision of an inherently safer design is one which has:
Fewer inherent hazards Reduced probability of unwanted events Reduced inventory and damage potential, leading to reduced severity of the event Fewer activities on the plant and thus less people exposed Reduced scope for smaller incidents to escalate and overwhelm the facilities Clear focus on simplicity, reliability and longevity to reduce exposure
The outcome of implementing an inherently safer design process is a robust concept in which the risks from major accident hazards have been minimised with emphasis on elimination of hazards and use of passive safety systems and measures. The management of residual risk from major hazards can then effectively achieved by the application of:
Safety Critical Design Measures (SCDM) that can be readily taken through into construction and maintained in operations and; Procedures to reduce the risks from safety critical tasks
By starting the hazard management process with the mind set of elimination of hazards, rather than using risk analysis techniques to aim for an ALARP solution, it is maintained that the risk profile achieved is lower than would have resulted from a traditional risk based approach. In addition the facility is simpler in design and construction with lower maintenance and inspection requirements.
The Use of QRA to Inform the Design of a High Pressure Onshore Pipeline
Authors: Nelson Stacy , Caulfield Margaret , Cosham Andrew 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
The management of onshore pipeline safety in the United Kingdom is governed by the Pipelines Safety Regulations, 1996. This requires pipeline operators to design, build and operate pipelines to ensure that they are safe, so far as is reasonably practicable. This is achieved, in part, by applying good practice and designing the pipeline to recognised onshore pipeline design codes. Where the proposed design falls outside the guidance in the codes, quantitative risk assessment provides an effective means of demonstrating a safe design.
This paper describes a study that was carried out to define the design requirements for the onshore section of a multiphase pipeline. The proposed pipeline will have a design pressure of 380 barg. However, onshore design codes PD 8010-1 and IGE/TD/1 do not provide guidance on the design of pipelines with design pressures exceeding 100barg. Experience from other projects indicates that it is important to consider the implications of such high design pressures early in a project.
The quantitative risk assessment considered a number of different design options. The safety risks of the proposed pipeline options were compared with those from a typical 100 barg gas transmission pipeline of the same diameter. This means that the risk of the proposed pipeline can be compared in a relative manner, to an ‘acceptable’ design, and in an absolute manner to limits on individual and societal risk.
The results of QRAs of the different design options are summarised and discussed. The effects of mitigation measures, such as reducing the pipeline design factor (the ratio of the hoop stress to the specified minimum yield strength), increasing the wall thickness, and incorporating a pressure limiting system at the landfall, are illustrated.
It is shown that the proposed design is feasible. The individual and societal risks for the proposed design were lower than that of a typical 100barg gas transmission pipeline. The individual risk was in the broadly accepted region of risk, as defined by the Health and Safety Executive, and the societal risk was below the acceptance criterion given in IGE/TD/1.
Planning and Executing EIA Baseline Studies in Remote and Socio Economically Complex Regions With Potential for Uncontacted People: Practical Guidelines From Working in Northern Peru
Authors: Achung M. Rodríguez , Sambartolome A. , Rawa A. D. , Rodriguez F. D. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Environmental Resources Management (ERM) and HSE International, LLC (HSE LLC) are supporting energy companies developing hydrocarbon reserves in northern Peru. Concessions in this region are in various stages of exploration and require completion of an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment process to comply with Peruvian regulations. Baseline studies needed for this process include sampling of environmental, physical, and socioeconomic parameters. The region is remote and undeveloped; over 90% is covered by primary rainforest and inhabited by indigenous communities. The region also has some potential for the presence of uncontacted people or communities in voluntary isolation. This paper will highlight the steps taken by ERM, with the support from Dr. Martha Rodriguez (who is also a Profesor at Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru) and HSE LLC to prepare field teams for the responsibility of interacting with indigenous communities in remote jungle environments, as well as the eventuality of encountering uncontacted people.
To date, we developed preventive measures and guidelines, a sociocultural contingency response plan for uncontacted communities or communities in voluntary isolation, and a communication protocol. These innovative and unique tools provide practical guidelines to minimize the risk for encounters with uncontacted people and outline steps in the event that such a contingency should occur. A process of due diligence was also undertaken to summarize publications, research, accounts, and hypotheses on the potential presence or transit of uncontacted people through particular areas. An evaluation of our clients' practices was completed to ensure consistency with policies, procedures, and reporting requirements. Contractors and employees were engaged via workshops and training. Finally, ERM Peru adopted a policy on working in areas potentially used by uncontacted peoples. The process, tools, and plans developed can serve as models for others working in the region or similar remote areas with the potential presence of uncontacted people or communities in voluntary isolation.
Integration of HSE Tools Leading to Better Leadership Action and System Improvements
Authors: Peuscher W. T. , de Wit M. D. C. , Bryden R. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Shell has, over the years, built up a comprehensive suite of HSE tools for incident prevention and analysis. Tools like Bowtie diagrams, Hearts and Minds and Tripod incident analysis have been presented separately at previous SPE conferences (Reference 8–19). Now these tools have matured, approaches will be presented for integrated application of these tools, which results in greatly enhanced benefits.
For incident analysis Tripod Beta theory has been used to improve the deep understanding of underlying causes of incidents. The widespread use of Bowtie diagram's to develop management systems with barriers to prevent incidents has made it logical to link failed barriers in the bowtie diagrams for a particular type of hazard to the Tripod Beta analysis of incidents. This leads to a more thorough analysis with more opportunities for learning.
Tripod Beta theory has been used for years within Shell International Exploration and Production as investigation method, but in recent years the Tripod Beta incident analysis methodology has been updated to link the underlying causes towards human behaviour models, resulting in more focused approach towards the human error. Therefore the immediate and underlying causes are better understood in relation to human behaviour.
This new update of the Tripod beta theory (with the improved human behaviour model) is interesting in a number of areas:
What can leaders practically do in preventing incidents on the workplace via leadership behaviour? Where should organizations focus their attention at preventing incidents? How can the Hearts and Minds tools be effectively applied once trends in incidents causation are established in the area of human behaviour elements?
This paper describes the thinking process, practical application and the outcome of the integration of Tripod beta and the Hearts and Minds concepts.
Compliance with the Equator Principles: What Does it Mean for Oil and Gas Companies?
Authors: Lowrance Courtney 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
More than 50 private financial institutions have adopted the Equator Principles: a voluntary set of guidelines, based on the IFC Performance Standards and EHS Guidelines, which was developed for managing social and environmental issues related to the financing of development projects. For oil and gas companies that seek project financing from international finance institutions for such projects, understanding fully the requirements of lenders from the outset can ensure access to capital and prevent project delays.
This paper will use case studies to highlight the environmental and social processes required to comply with the Equator Principles, and discuss ways that companies interested in pursuing project financing can maximize their EHS management systems and processes to meet these requirements. Key process phases include
Scoping Preparation of an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA); Development of Environmental and Social Management Plans; Public Consultation and Disclosure, Grievance Mechanisms and Ongoing Stakeheolder Engagement; Independent Environmental Review; Covenanting Environmental and Social Action Plans - contractual requirements introduced to achieve financial close; and Independent Monitoring and Reporting
Some concrete and practical approaches for streamlining the Equator process have emerged over the last four years of implementation. For example, early communication between the project sponsor and lenders regarding the relevant IFC Performance Standards required by the Equator Principles is essential for efficient processing of credit approvals. Other considerations include selection of financial advisors who are aware of the Equator requirements and qualified consultants, preparation of a Terms of Reference for the EIA, and documentation of public consultation.
To date there are 55 Equator Principle signatories, including banks from Japan, South Africa, Australia, South America, North America, and Europe. Over 80% of all project financing is subject to the Equator Principles.
Integrating HSE in the Business
Authors: Saleh Khadejah 
Published: April 2008

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PAPER
One of the key constraints in managing HSE risks is that HSE is often considered as a parallel activity which is owned by HSE professionals. Industrial mainstream employees do not easily realize the virtues of HSE and consider it as extra work to satisfy legal, statutory, corporate or voluntary requirements.
In order to manage the HSE risks effectively, it is important that HSE is integrated into the routine business operations and the business process whether it is oil and gas or any other industry. This integration is not an easy process as HSE is not widely understood by personnel.
The paper will consist of the best possible methodologies to ensure understanding and awareness on HSE by the mainstream personnel so that there is an effective buy-in and subsequent effective implementation and include many time – tested practical examples and tools and techniques like critical task identification and analysis, risk assessment of permit to work etc..
To summarize, the paper will comprise of three sub headings:
Integration of HSE in the routine Operations of Oil and Gas industries Integration of HSE in the business processes of Oil and Gas industries and Integration of HSE in the project lifecycles of Oil and Gas Industries

The paper will focus on tools and techniques that can be best adapted for integration of HSE in every stage of operations from concept to commissioning and the operating stage in the business of Oil and Gas industries, which in turn, will guarantee the highest degree of HSE compliance.

AREA OF INTEREST
The target audience will include personnel from Operations, Maintenance, HSE and Projects disciplines in the Oil/ Gas industries as well as other similar industries.
Delivering Social Performance During Appraisal: The Case of Royal Dutch Shell's Grosmont Venture in Northern Alberta, Canada
Authors: Fossgard-Moser Titus 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
This paper summarises the approach adopted by Royal Dutch Shell's Grosmont Venture towards social performance during its winter 2007 appraisal campaign in Northern Alberta, Canada. The paper first considers the background to the appraisal activities, as well as the local environmental and socio-political context. The paper then provides a summary of Royal Dutch Shell's Global framework for social performance and its conceptual relevance to the Grosmont Venture.
The next two sections of the paper look in detail at the strategic and operational approach adopted by the Venture. At the strategic level the paper summarizes how the concept of ‘Business Integration’ was used to drive the Venture's approach to all non-technical issues including social performance. In particular the specific organizational structure, values and principles for, and management systems and processes adopted by the Venture are all identified as being critical for establishing the framework within which the appraisal campaign's social performance activities were undertaken. The operationalisation of the business integration approach and specific management of social performance issues during the Grosmont Venture's 2007 winter appraisal campaign is next considered. A number of specific examples are provided in relation to the Venture's approach to impact assessment and consultation, management of social impacts and delivery of community benefits. Finally the impact of these activities both for the Grosmont Venture, as well as for local First Nation and other stakeholders in summarized.
The final two sections of the paper discuss the key success factors supporting the Venture's successful appraisal campaign as well as areas for future consideration. The Business Integration strategy is above all highlighted as being critical in driving the approach – in particular in terms of ensuring equal consideration of social performance and other non technical factors along side technical and commercial considerations. The role the Venture Manager and senior operational managers played in supporting business integration and related social performance activities is also highlighted. A number of areas for future consideration are identified including how to further institutionalize the business integration model, as well as some of the more strategic social performance challenges for a potential commercial project.
Sources of Hydrocarbon Leaks and Spills in Upstream Oil Industries, Its Potential Reasons and Preventive Measures
Authors: Al Mansouri Fares , Alam Mohammad Aftab 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Leak & Spill of hydrocarbon is still the main concern particularly in upstream oil industries. There have been 574 incidents of hydrocarbon leaks & spills in the Company during the period 2003 – 2006. These cases of leaks & spills are accounting 40 – 45% of the total reportable incidents in the Company. The impact of leaks & spills on Company HSE data demanded special attention to control such incidents as an immediate measure and prevent its reoccurrence through strategic planning. Accordingly Safety Team took an initiative to study in detail all cases of hydrocarbon leaks & spills in the Company and came out with solution both for short term gain and long term strategy.
As a part of study; the leak and spill data for the period 2003 – 2006 in the Company were analyzed to find out the immediate as well as root causes and categorized the failure scenario accordingly. The data analysis led to the conclusion that majority (more than 90%) of these leaks and spills are due to one or combination of the potential root causes such as:
Aging Facilities Equipment Failure Construction Defect Accidental Damage Defeat / Bypassing Protective System Ineffective Quality Control Operational Deviation Design Fault Blow Out of Oil Well Human Error …etc.
Based on the data analysis the most common reasons (22 numbers) of hydrocarbon leaks & spills were compiled alongwith their remedial measures. Those 22 most common reasons were shared across the Company in a specific Leak & Spill Prevention Campaign carried out for a month. Each day a brief description, onsite picture & preventive action for an individual cause of leak & spill was circulated through postmaster till the last one on 22nd working day of the month. The campaign was also supported with presentations, posters, leaflets, quiz program, mementoes and motivational schemes.
The identification of main causes and its preventive actions resulted enhancing the awareness level of workers. The impact of such exercise is reflected on Integrity Management of facilities as well improving HSE Statistics in the Company.
Value Added Health Management—A Model to Measure Realized Benefits
Authors: Donnelly R. , Pedersen C. , de Jong G. , Niven K. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
In assessing the impact of a corporate health function, activity is frequently identified as an outcome and indicator of value. This may not be valid in all cases since the activity may be non-value adding, not necessary to manage risk or meet legal compliance and may persist largely as a result of unchallenged practice in the workplace. During a review of activity of an occupational health team in a multinational oil and gas company, an effort was made to map all the activity of the function to bottom line value for the company. This "value tree" was built by the identification of the company health vision, and mapping back to the work actually completed in support of the strategy. Work was then assessed as high value and supportive of the strategy or low value (i.e. activity which could not be directly linked to the strategy and hence value). Progress maps of critical activity were created, identifying the "as-is" and "to-be" situations for value-adding activity and finally Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were identified for this work so that value-add could be tracked and progress measured. Although time consuming this was found to be a worthwhile exercise for large projects within the department to ensure focus on necessary work and to identify non value adding work that could be retired.