Completion of the DrugMatrix Toxicogenomics Database using ToxCompl
Authors: Cong Guojing , Patton Robert M. , Chao Frank , Svoboda Daniel L. , Casey Warren M. , Schmitt Charles P. , Murphy Charles , Erickson Jeremy N. , Combs Parker , Auerbach Scott S. 
Published: March 2024

AbstractThe DrugMatrix Database contains systematically generated toxicogenomics data from short-term in vivo studies for over 600 chemicals. However, most of the potential endpoints in the database are missing due to a lack of experimental measurements. We present our study on leveraging matrix factorization and machine learning methods to predict the missing values in the DrugMatrix, which includes gene expression across eight tissues on two expression platforms along with paired clinical chemistry, hematology, and histopathology measurements. One major challenge we encounter is the skewed distribution of the available measured data, in terms of both tissue sources and values. We propose a method, ToxiCompl, that applies systematic hybrid sampling guided by Bayesian optimization in conjunction with low-rank matrix factorization to recover the missing values. ToxiCompl achieves good training and validation performance from a machine learning perspective.We further conduct an in-depth validation of the predicted data from biological and toxicological perspectives with a series of analyses. These include examining the connectivity pattern of predicted gene expression responses, characterizing molecular pathway-level responses from sets of differentially expressed genes, evaluating known transcriptional biomarkers of tissue toxicity, and characterizing pre-dicted apical endpoints. Our analysis shows that the predicted differential gene expression, broadly speaking, aligns with what would be anticipated. For example, in most instances, our predicted differentially expressed gene lists offer a connectivity level comparable to that of measured data in connectivity analysis. Using Havcr1, a known transcriptional biomarker of kidney injury, we identify treatments that, based on the predicted expression data, manifest kidney toxicity in a manner that is mechanistically plausible and supported by the literature. Characterization of the predicted clinical chemistry data suggests that strong effects are relatively reliably predicted, while more subtle effects pose a greater challenge. In the case of histopathological prediction, we find a significant overprediction due to positivity bias in the measured data. Developing methods to deal with this bias is one of the areas we plan to target for future improvement. The main advantage of the ToxiCompl approach is that, in the absence of additional experimental data, it drastically extends the toxicogenomic landscape into a number of data-poor tissues, thereby allowing researchers to formulate mechanistic hypotheses about effects in tissues that have been underrepresented in the literature. All measured and predicted DrugMatrix data (i.e., gene expression, clinical chemistry, hematology, and histopathology) are available to the public through an intuitive GUI interface that allows for data retrieval, gene set analysis and high dimensional visualization of gene expression similarity (https://rstudio.niehs.nih.gov/complete_drugmatrix/).