Remarks on the Idea of Spontaneous Break‐Down of Symmetry, Cosmic Variability of Eddington's Number, Mach's Idea Concering the Origin of Inertia, and Field Equations Describing Global and Local Gravitational Fields
Authors: Kasper U. 
Published: May 2007

AbstractSubject is considered on the level of classical field theory. We start from some aspects of the theory of ferromagnets. Their counterpart in classical field theory is pointed out using the over simplified model of a selfinteracting scalar field. The ground state (“vacuum expection value”) of the scalar field is interpreted as cosmic background field, which can be considered as constant for local physical phenomena. In practice, however, it is a function of the age of universe. Which kind of function it could be is suggested by a discussion of the cosmic variability of Eddington's number γ = 1040, which refers to Dirac's consideration of this problem. But contrary to Dirac's assumption that atomic quantities are constant, we suppose that the inertial mass of elementary particles is a function of the age of universe.The cosmic gravitational field is described by other equations than the gravitational field created by local matter distributions. The field equations for the local gravitational field we start from reduce to Einstein's equations, if we neglect the possible influence of the universe on local phenomena. In case that the cosmic matter is homogeneously and isotropically distributed, the field equations for the cosmic gravitational field permit only such a time dependent solution the three‐spaces of which are linearly expanding and spherically closed.The different field equations for cosmic and local gravitational fields are considered approximations of more fundamental field equations which approximately split into two sets of equations, if it is possible to contrast local physical systems with the universe. The described cosmological model taken as a basis, the inertial mass of elementary particles becomes a function of the matter density creating the cosmic gravitational field. This could be considered as, at least, partly realisation of Mach's idea concerning the origin of inertia. Starting from the interpretation of the ground state (vacuum expection value) as a function of a certain cosmic background field, more realistic gage field models could give the following picture of cosmic development: In the far past there was a state of the universe characterized by enormous contraction of matter. In this stage of development, it was impossible to contrast particles with the universe. Matter expands and it becomes possible to contrast certain physical systems with the universe. But the ground state is such a symmetric one that only fields with vanishing rest mass can be contrasted with the universe (ferromagnet above Curie temperature). With further expansion of the universe the ground state will lose certain symmetry properties. By this it becomes possible that you get the impression there are particles with nonvanishing rest mass (ferromagnet below Curie temperature). Finally, the influence of the universe on local physical systems goes to zero with further expansion. Especially, this means the inertial mass of elementary particles goes to zero, too (Curie temperature of ferromagnetic material goes to zero with cosmic expansion).