Cardiovascular/anti‐inflammatory drugs repurposed for treating or preventing cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized trials
Authors: Benjamin David J. , Haslam Alyson , Prasad Vinay 
Published: March 2024

AbstractBackgroundDue to encouraging pre‐clinical data and supportive observational studies, there has been growing interest in applying cardiovascular drugs (including aspirin, angiotensin‐converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, statins, and metformin) approved to treat diseases such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus to the field of oncology. Moreover, given growing costs with cancer care, these medications have offered a potentially more affordable avenue to treat or prevent recurrence of cancer.We sought to investigate the anti‐cancer effects of drugs repurposed from cardiology or anti‐inflammatories to treat cancer. We specifically evaluated the following drug classes: HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitors, aspirin, metformin, and both angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors. We also included non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) because they exert a similar mechanism to aspirin by blocking prostaglandins and reducing inflammation that is thought to promote the development of cancer.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature review using PubMed and Web of Science with search terms including “aspirin,” “NSAID,” “statin” (including specific statin drug names), “metformin,” “ACE inhibitors,” and “ARBs” (including specific anti‐hypertensive drug names) in combination with “cancer.” Searches were limited to human studies published between 2000 and 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe number and percentage of studies reported positive results and pooled estimates of overall survival, progression‐free survival, response, and disease‐free survival.ResultsWe reviewed 3094 titles and included 67 randomized clinical trials. The most common drugs that were tested were metformin (n = 21; 30.9%), celecoxib (n = 20; 29.4%), and simvastatin (n = 8; 11.8%). There was only one study that tested cardiac glycosides and none that studied ACE inhibitors. The most common tumor types were non‐small‐cell lung cancer (n = 19; 27.9%); breast (n = 8; 20.6%), colorectal (n = 7; 10.3%), and hepatocellular (n = 6; 8.8%). Most studies were conducted in a phase II trial (n = 38; 55.9%). Most studies were tested in metastatic cancers (n = 49; 72.1%) and in the first‐line setting (n = 36; 521.9%). Four studies (5.9%) were stopped early because of difficulty with accrual. The majority of studies did not demonstrate an improvement in either progression‐free survival (86.1% of studies testing progression‐free survival) or in overall survival (94.3% of studies testing overall survival). Progression‐free survival was improved in five studies (7.4%), and overall survival was improved in three studies (4.4%). Overall survival was significantly worse in two studies (3.8% of studies testing overall survival), and progression‐free survival was worse in one study (2.8% of studies testing progression‐free survival).Conclusions and RelevanceDespite promising pre‐clinical and population‐based data, cardiovascular drugs and anti‐inflammatory medications have overall not demonstrated benefit in the treatment or preventing recurrence of cancer. These findings may help guide future potential clinical trials involving these medications when applied in oncology.