Induced Seismology and Hydrocarbon Production
Authors: Puckett M.W. , Le Calvez J.H. 
Published: October 2008

Abstract
Microseismicity generated during hydraulic fracturing operations provides information tooptimize stimulation design,direct treatment operations, andmore effectively manage the stimulated reservoir by understanding the dimensions of the treatment footprint.
Microseismic monitoring technique is applicable to all reservoirs requiring hydraulic stimulation to assure commercial productivity. Geophysics moves beyond mere reflection seismic to applying the principles of earthquake seismology to address issues related to hydraulic fracture stimulation and reservoir management.

Introduction
Microseimic techniques have been used to map hydraulic fracturing operations since the mid-1980s. The method received curious stares until the seminal works in the mid- to late-1990s at the M-Site near Rulison, Coloradoand the Cotton Valley Field in Texasbegan appearing in industry publications.
Commercial interest in the technology heightened, and is now offered by several service companies, typically using systems originally built for recording vertical seismic profiles. Entire sections are now devoted to microseismic monitoring of hydraulic fracture operations at the international conferences for both engineering and geophysics.
As a business in the United States, it is estimated that microseismic monitoring of hydraulic fracturing operations has grown from a few dozen wells in 2002 to over 600 wells monitored in 2006 (Figure 1). Moreover, the number of stages being monitored has grown from just over one stage per well to more than three stages being monitored per well. The staggering growth of this technology highlights both its broad acceptance in industry, as well as the great need for the information it provides, especially in horizontal wells.

Applications
Microseismic hydraulic fracture monitoring (MHFM) demonstrates value to the operator in three distinct applications: fracture treatment diagnostics, fracture treatment control, and reservoir management. The locations of the microseismic events are displayed in 3D volumes, minimally with sketches of the treatment well and observation well to provide geometrical context (Figure 2).

Fracture Treatment Diagnostics
The use of MHFM for fracture treatment diagnostics seeks to answer two main questions:How did the treatment perform versus design?What parameters or assumptions need to be changed to achieve a higher performing treatment design?
Weak assumptions of symmetry, rock properties, and treatment pressure interpretation often lead to an improper analysis of treatment performance. The MHFM data provides measured context for understanding the treatment behavior and performance. The MHFM results constrain the possible interpretation of the treatment data, and can lead to more productive treatment designs (3) (Figure 3).

Fracture Treatment Control
MHFM operations can provide valuable real-time control information for the treatment operations. The questions MHFM can answer are:How well is the treatment being contained?When should pumping stop due to terminating mechanical growth or geological concerns?