Abstract LB450: Mechanisms of acquired resistance to AKT inhibitor capivasertib in AKT1 mutant patient derived breast cancer models
Authors: Mearns Sarah , Pearson Alex , Sim Li-Xuan , Cutts Rosalind , Sritharan Prithika , Shah Heena , Gulati Aditi , Williamson Stuart , Barry Simon , De-Bruin Elza , Turner Nicholas C. 
Published: April 2024

Abstract
Capivasertib, a pan-AKT inhibitor, has recently been approved in combination with fulvestrant to treat ER+ HER2- breast cancer patients with one or more of PI3KCA/AKT1/PTEN alterations. However, as with many targeted therapies acquired drug resistance remains a challenge. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms of acquired capivasertib resistance in AKT1 mutant breast cancer models.
We established two estrogen receptor positive (ER+) AKT1 E17K mutant breast cancer patient derived organoids (PDOs), that were sensitive to capivasertib in vitro. PDOs were chronically exposed to 1µM capivasertib. PDOs were sequenced (DNA & RNA) at multiple timepoints of treatment (3 days, 4 and 9 weeks after development of resistance). Using CRISPR-Cas9 editing we also engineered CAMA1 (ER+) cells to express AKT1 E17K, and generated derived resistant AKT1 mutant and parental models in response to continuous capivasertib exposure. CAMA1 AKT1 mutant and parental resistant were screened with an siRNA Kinome library supplemented with genes from the PDO RNA-sequencing. Phosphoproteomics was performed on capivasertib resistant E17K models in the presence and absence of capivasertib.
PDO models persisting after either 4 or 9 weeks of capivasertib treatment showed no acquisition of genetic driver events, or changes in AKT copy number. Resistant organoids at 9 weeks treatment showed increased expression of ERBB3 (HER3), EGFR3 and LPAR5 as well as increased expression of MAPK signalling components. In siRNA screens on CAMA1 derived resistant models, siRNA targeting ERBB2, CDK4, PLK4 and CHEK1, ESR1 and LPAR5 modulated sensitivity to capivasertib. Analysis of phosphoproteins in capivasertib resistant models revealed reactivation of mTORC1 signalling despite sustained AKT inhibition, with dramatic upregulation of PDK1 and mTORC2. Consistent with the siRNA screens, drug combinations identified fulvestrant as a synergistic agent with capivasertib in the resistant E17K models. Sensitivity to mTOR inhibition was maintained in capivasertib resistant models, with mTOR inhibition re-sensitizing cells to capivasertib.
In these models, acquired resistance to capivasertib occurs through upregulation of ER signalling and rewiring of pathway signalling to bypass AKT inhibition and reactivate mTORC1. Targeting these mechanisms could prolong the use of capivasertib, with future work focusing on validating these mechanisms and re-sensitizing drug combinations in other AKT1 mutant models & PDOs.
Citation Format: Sarah Mearns, Alex Pearson, Li-Xuan Sim, Rosalind Cutts, Prithika Sritharan, Heena Shah, Aditi Gulati, Stuart Williamson, Simon Barry, Elza De-Bruin, Nicholas C. Turner. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to AKT inhibitor capivasertib in AKT1 mutant patient derived breast cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB450.