Cross‐reactivity of human igg anti‐F(ab′)2 antibody with DNA and other nuclear antigens
Authors: Williams Ralph C. , Malone Christine C. , Cimbalnik Kelly , Presley Matthew A. , Roux Kenneth H. , Strelets Lioudmila , Silvestris Franco 
Published: February 2007

AbstractObjective. To characterize immunologic specificity and possible antiidiotype activity of IgG anti‐F(ab′)2 in normal subjects as well as in patients with active and inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods. IgG anti‐F(ab′)2 and anti‐double‐stranded DNA (anti‐dsDNA) were affinity isolated from immunoadsorption columns of F(ab′)2 and dsDNA linked to Sepharose 4B. Affinity‐purified IgG anti‐F(ab′)2 (APAF) and affinity‐isolated IgG anti‐dsDNA (APAD) were tested by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for other cross‐reacting specificities including anti‐Sm, anti‐Sm/RNP, and anti‐ Crithidia binding. Anti‐DNA specificity of APAF and APAD was assayed by S1 nuclease treatment of heat‐denatured DNA. Rabbit antiidiotypic antisera were prepared by immunization with APAF and APAD from normal subjects and SLE patients and absorption with insolubilized human Cohn fraction II (Fr II). VL and VH regions of 5 monoclonal IgM antibodies with anti‐F(ab′)2/anti‐DNA specificity generated by Epstein‐Barr virus B cell stimulation were sequenced by polymerase chain reaction and characterized for VH and VL subgroup. APAF and APAD were also examined by high‐resolution electron microscopy for possible ring forms indicative of antiidiotypic V‐region interactions.Results. APAF from normal subjects, representing 0.08‐0.18% of serum IgG, showed striking relative concentrations of both anti‐F(ab′)2 and anti‐DNA, as well as anti‐Sm and anti‐Sm/RNP ELISA reactivity. Both APAF and APAD reacting with F(ab′)2 or dsDNA on the ELISA plate could be cross‐inhibited by F(ab′)2 or DNA in solution. Anti‐DNA reactivity in normal APAF and APAD was much more sensitive to S1 nuclease treatment than similar fractions from SLE patients. Neither APAF nor APAD from controls produced positive antinuclear immunofluorescence or positive Crithidia staining, whereas these were strongly positive using SLE APAF and APAD. Absorbed rabbit antisera against normal or SLE APAF and APAD showed strong ELISA reactivity against both APAF and APAD, but no residual reactivity with normal Fr II. VL and VH sequencing of monoclonal human IgM antibodies showing both anti‐F(ab′)2 and anti‐DNA reactivity showed relative VH3, Vk1 or VH1, Vk3 restriction. No evidence of ring forms or V‐region “kissing” dimers was obtained when normal or SLE APAD or APAF was examined by high‐resolution electron microscopy.Conclusion. IgG anti‐F(ab′)2 in both normal subjects and SLE patients represents a polyreactive Ig subfraction with concomitant anti‐DNA, anti‐Sm, and anti‐Sm/RNP specificities. Anti‐DNA reactivity in SLE is qualitatively different from that in normal APAD and APAF since normal APAD and APAF anti‐DNA is much more sensitive to S1 nuclease digestion of denatured dsDNA. APAF and APAD share distinct V‐region antigens which may be related to prominent VH3 or VH1 antigenic components. No evidence for in vivo complexing of anti‐DNA and anti‐F(ab′)2 as ring forms or antiidiotype‐IgG complexes was observed during ultrastructural studies. In both normal individuals and SLE patients, APAF may represent a small polyreactive IgG subfraction which also contains antinuclear and anti‐DNA specificities.