Differential Effect of Esmolol on the Fast and Slow AV Nodal Pathways in Patients with AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
Authors: PHILIPPON FRANÇOIS , PLUMB VANCE J. , KAY G. NEAL 
Published: May 2007

Esmolol Effect on AV Nodal Pathways. Introduction: AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) usually involves anterograde conduction over a slowly conducting (“slow”) pathway and retrograde conduction over a rapidly conducting (“fast”) pathway. A variety of drugs, such as beta blockers, digitalis, and calcium channel blockers, have been reported to prolong AV nodal refractoriness in both the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the circuit. However, few data are available that address whether the fast and slow pathways respond in a quantitatively different manner to drugs such as beta‐adrenergic antagonists. In addition, it is not known whether the effects of these agents on refractoriness parallel the effects on conduction in the fast and slow pathways. The present study was performed to measure the effect of the intravenous beta‐adrenergic agent, esmolol, on refractoriness and conduction in both the fast and slow AV nodal pathways in patients with AVNRT. Methods and Results: Thirteen patients with discontinuous AV nodal conduction properties and typical AVNRT were studied. Anterograde and retrograde AV nodal functional assessment was performed at baseline and following steady‐state drug infusion of intravenous esmolol at a dose of 500 μg/kg for 1 minute, 150 /μg/kg per minute for the next 4 minutes, followed by a continuous maintenance infusion of 50 to 100 μg/kg per minute. The anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway increased from 381 ± 75 msec at baseline to 453 ± 92 msec during the infusion of esmolol (P = 0.003). The anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway was also prolonged by esmolol, from 289 ± 26 msec to 310 ± 17 msec (P = 0.005). However, the absolute magnitude of the change in the anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (+72 ± 59 msec) was significantly greater than the change in anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway (+21 ± 16 msec, P = 0.01). The mean retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway increased from 276 ± 46 msec to 376 ± 61 msec during esmolol infusion (P = 0.03). Retrograde slow pathway conduction that could not be demonstrated at baseline became manifest in three patients during esmolol infusion. In contrast to the effects of esmolol on refractoriness, the AH interval during anterograde slow pathway conduction prolonged to a far greater extent (+84 msec) than the HA interval associated with retrograde fast pathway conduction (+5 msec, P = 0.04). Conclusion: The beta‐adrenergic antagonist, esmolol, has a quantitatively greater effect on anterograde refractoriness of the fast than the slow AV nodal pathway. However, the effects on conduction intervals during AVNRT are greater in the anterograde slow pathway than in the retrograde fast pathway. These observations suggest that the fast and slow pathways may have differential sensitivities to autonomic influences. This difference in the response to beta‐adrenergic antagonists may be exploited as a clinically useful method for demonstrating slow pathway conduction in some individuals with AVNRT.