Abstract 1037: Clinical application of next-generation digital PCR capable of real-time analysis to HER2 measurement as a novel diagnostic in breast cancer: A multicenter retrospective study
Authors: Kim Hayeon , Park Soo Young , Yang Sohyeon , Song Min Ji , Kim Da Sol , Chang Jin hyuk , Kim YoonSik , Choi Hee-Joo , Heo Nam Hun , Won Hee-Young , Park Ji-Hye , Song Minsik , Shin Seung-Shick , Lee Do Young , Jang Si-Hyong , Lee Jeong-Yeon , Ryu Han Suk 
Published: March 2024

Abstract
HER2 testing is still challenging due to the subjective natures of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH), standard methods for determining HER2 status. Here, we developed a clinically reliable HER2 testing method enabling ultra-fast detection of HER2 gene amplification with high accuracy by using the digital real-time PCR (drPCR) system. To test the clinical validity and standardize procedures of drPCR-based HER2 status evaluation, three independent breast cancer cohorts from different institutions were enrolled, which assigned as a training (SCHU hospital, n = 103) and two validation sets (SNU hospital, n = 170; CNUH hospital, n = 45), and the drPCR assay was compared with current standard HER2 testing methods. In the training cohort, the HER2/CEP17 ratio values from FISH and drPCR tests were highly correlated (r2 = 0.81; P &lt; 0.001), and the drPCR results displayed 98.1% concordance to HER2 status defined by IHC and/or FISH with 92.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Eight samples further verified by targeted NGS showed 100% concordance of dPCR to NGS. Consistently, two validation cohorts also showed high concordance of drPCR to IHC and/or ISH results (accuracy = 97.1% and 97.8% in SNU and CNUH cohorts, respectively). The optimal cutoff for HER2 positivity in the drPCR assay was set as a HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 1.9 with AUC of 0.963 based on the results from training cohort, and the same cut-off for drPCR was applicable to two independent validation cohorts, supporting the clinical validity of our drPCR-based HER2 assessment. In some discordant cases, low tumor purity (≤ 25%) was observed and microdissection partly improved the drPCR results. The discordance between drPCR and ISH results was also found in marginal HER2+ cases with HER2/CEP17 ratio 2-3, but these cases showed inter-observer variability when re-evaluating the ISH/IHC data due to intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity. Of note, in HER2 IHC3+ cases with negative drPCR results, re-evaluation of IHC using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based HER2 scoring system revised the HER2 IHC 3+ score to 2+, and ISH assessment also confirmed that these cases are indeed HER2-negative, proving the high accuracy of HER2 CN drPCR assay. In conclusion, given the advantages of drPCR-based HER2 assessment with high accuracy, sensitivity, and simplicity, the drPCR assay could be a complementary or alternative method to IHC and ISH to greatly improve current HER2 testing.
Citation Format: Hayeon Kim, Soo Young Park, Sohyeon Yang, Min Ji Song, Da Sol Kim, Jin hyuk Chang, YoonSik Kim, Hee-Joo Choi, Nam Hun Heo, Hee-Young Won, Ji-Hye Park, Minsik Song, Seung-Shick Shin, Do Young Lee, Si-Hyong Jang, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Han Suk Ryu. Clinical application of next-generation digital PCR capable of real-time analysis to HER2 measurement as a novel diagnostic in breast cancer: A multicenter retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1037.