bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
EPRA—A Tool for Integrated HSE/ISR Risk Management in Early Project Phases
Authors: Kinn Sigurd Juel , Thomassen Odd , Kinsella Kevin , Roberts Gareth 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
This paper describes a method and tool, EPRA (Early Phase Risk Assessment) developed by StatoilHydro, to identify and evaluate key Health, Safety, Security, Environmental (HSE) Risks, together with Business Integrity and Social Responsibility (ISR) Risks relevant to prospective Business Opportunities. The main objective is to identify the major risks, understand these and control them through Management involvement. The tool enables risks to be assessed by a multi-disciplinary team in a consistent and auditable way and the results communicated in a clear and consistent format to Management as part of the normal business decision making process.
The development of EPRA involved a multidisciplinary team from StatoilHydro together with international consultants, ERM. Through several workshops, a common terminology and methodology for risk assessment was agreed across the disciplines. Based on these specifications, a prototype tool was developed and successfully tested on a series of fictitious and real project opportunities. As the tool has been developed with extensive involvement of all disciplines within the company, the organization is taking ownership to the tool and the process has thus strengthend the relations between the disciplines.
Following the initial testing the prototype tool was modified and is now being rolled out for use within StatoilHydro. It has been implemented as a web based solution, but with a portable version of the tool provided for use in locations where internet access may not be available.
Besides the multi-disciplinary approach, some of the main features of EPRA are that: both risks and opportunities are included;it can be used to address both planned and accidental events;it is very flexible and can be tailormade to support a variety of decisions; andit is developed as a communicative tool to inform management.
The EPRA methodology constitutes a multidisciplinary working process supported by a tool and includes a ‘light’ version for rapid screening of risks and opportunities. A specialized module for ‘brownfield’ assessments (for existing facilities) is currently being developed.
This paper describes the main steps in the EPRA methodology and the process followed in performing an assessment using EPRA in a workshop environment. It is the authors’ understanding that tools which consider such a broad range of project risks, are at an early stage of development and few have been presented in public before. A key benefit of the EPRA tool is that it ‘integrates’ a wide range of disciplines (HSE and ISR) into a holistic risk assessment process and ensures that technical risk information is communicated as soon as possible in a clear, efficient and consistent way.
Technology and Innovations Contribute to Safety and Efficiency in Storm Disaster Recovery
Authors: Mailey J. F. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Chevron's Gulf of Mexico Business Unit faced unprecedented challenges following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Storm surge and high winds toppled 13 platforms and 11 caissons as well as damaging six other platforms to the point of condemnation. Associated pipelines totaling 73 miles were also impacted. In addition, 132 active and inactive wells associated with the toppled platforms and caissons needed to be plugged and abandoned. None of the wells were in their customary upright condition. Traditional abandonment practices in such a situation would be extremely diver intensive and extremely hazardous.
Safety and completing the work incident free was a priority. Extensive planning efforts were undertaken to minimize diver exposure. Unique challenges were posed by the toppled structures, and their associated debris fields, as the mechanical configuration of the structure, as well as the nature and extent of the debris field, was needed to develop an effective removal plan. Another problem was potential energy stored in bent or deformed structural members and pipes.
Therefore, innovative approaches were developed and new technology applied to reduce the safety exposure and improve efficiency in removing toppled structures and debris. 3-D modeling technology was used to aid in site assessment and work planning, new hydraulic shear technology was developed for cutting structural members and conductors, high pressure abrasive cutting technology was adapted from the North Sea, and a pipeline "strong back" was developed to control stored energy in pipelines. The tools were designed to be placed in position by a diver but operated from the surface, keeping the diver "out of the line of fire."
The tools and practices developed contributed to a relatively low on the job injury rate. An additional benefit was that many of the tools and practices can be used in routine abandonment operations to reduce diver exposure and improve efficiency.
The Integration of High Performance Work Systems and Workplace Safety in the Oil and Gas Industry
Authors: Barling J. , Dupré K. E. , Kavanagh J. M. , Kenny S. , Khan F. , Veitch B. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
The oil and gas industry is a high risk environment. Despite advancements in technology and safety management practices, major disasters do occur and relatively minor safety related incidents occur fairly frequently. When managing safety, placing an emphasis on engineering technologies, the most proximal factor in the chain of events, or safety management practices themselves, in isolation from the complex interaction between technology, human factors and organizational structures, is insufficient and can be misleading. This paper addresses the development and integration of a high performance work systems (HPWS) approach with conventional engineering and management practices to improve safety in the offshore oil and gas industry. A safety-related HPWS approach emphasizes the role of integrating practical related engineering management and human resource management practices to produce positive outcomes and to promote a safe working environment. The integration of technical engineering practice with management systems will promote the development of an effective framework to improve workplace safety in the offshore oil and gas industry. Towards this, authors are developing an integrated approach of workplace safety management by linking predtive accident models with HPWS. This has the potential to reduce risk, enhance safety and provide a greater return on investment for this industry.
Engaging Employees in Safety
Authors: Featherly Janey 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Many organizations in the oil and gas industry continue to make significant, consistent reductions in incident and injury rates, and the industry itself has set aggressive new standards for safer equipment and working environments. However, serious injuries in our industry continue, while our improvement rates have begun to plateau. A new focus is required to reach and sustain the next significant milestone toward a zero-injury workplace.
Industries of all types are beginning to realize that traditional safety methods (engineering and administrative controls) will not be cnough to make this next step change. The new safety culture must include giving employees ownership and empowerment to make decisions about their safety and that of their co-workers.
This paper will demonstrate that employee-led safety programs expand and improve an organization's ability to curb injuries. It will explore how companies are engaging employees in safety through formal employee-led safety programs. The paper will include case studies from companies, both within and outside the oil and gas industry, who are in different states of engaging in this process. These case studies will look at the successes and lessons learned from initial implementation through various states of program maturity, as well as how management teams support an employee-led safety culture.
The Risk Management Process—An Overview
Authors: Khalaf F. , Ela M. Abu El 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Risk management is essential to any activity. It is a continuous, iterative and proactive process performed to identify and prevent potential undesirable events before they occur and to reduce the probability of their recurrence, so risk-handling activities can be proactively planned and invoked. It is a key element and an integral part of every quality engineering processes and projects.
The cost of adopting a reactive attitude towards risk is very expensive. Most of the expenses are not visible or are not necessarily directly borne by the owner of the business, does not show in the financial statements because they are hidden and/or diluted in day-to-day work or considered by people, in a prevailing culture, as part of the routine work and general pay. A major part of the cost is the result of long term consequences of events borne by the society. Therefore, risk management should adopt a proactive attitude.
This paper presents a recent overview about (1) risk management process, (2) organizational sources of risk, (3) cost benefit of having a successful risk management system, (4) risk audits process, and (5) the recent improvements of risk culture. We intend to show that risk management can work as style for managing business, the same way as total quality, continuous improvement and environment protection. It leads to optimum performance. The paper shows also that the level of risk culture can be a measure for civism and progress of any community.
Implementation of Environmental Performance Rating for Business Program (PROPER) as Environmental Compliance Tool for Upstream Oil and Gas Industries
Authors: Edvantoro B. B. , Sumaljo D. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Environmental Performance Rating for Business Program (PROPER) is a compliance tool, which has been developed by Indonesian Ministry of State for Environment (MOE) since in 1994. The main purpose of PROPER is to improve compliance status of companies through public disclosure.
The difference between PROPER and other environmental audit program is that PROPER emphasizes on the output of company's environmental management. The rating in PROPER was categorized in five different colors, i.e. black, red, blue, green and gold. Briefly, black and red give to the non-compliance category; blue was given to the companies, which is complied with the minimal requirement of regulation; while green and gold are awarded for companies, which show "beyond compliance" category.
Based on the results of PROPER audit in 1995-1997, it showed that. PROPER was effective to improve the company compliance percentage to 9.4% from 213 industries at various sectors of industries including manufactures, mining, energy, oil and gas and agriculture sectors. This paper will only focus on the upstream oil and gas sectors involved in PROPER program. As a result, in 2002 PROPER for upsteam oil and gas sectors showed that five upsteam oil and gas companies were rated blue colour (compliance category) and one company was rated red colour (non compliance category). While, the PROPER's result in 2003 showed that 11 upsteam oil and gas companies (73.3%) were shown as compliance category (blue rating) among 15 companies audited, while the rest (26.7%) were categorized as non-compliance companies (red rating).
In PROPER's 2004 outcome, the finding showed that 36 upstream oil and gas industries were awarded as compliance companies (blue color) exhibiting 72% among 50 industries audited. While, 14 upstream oil and gas companies were categorized as non-compliance companies (28%). The major incompliance aspects stressed upon the mismanagement of hazardous and toxic wastes. In this finding, no green rating was found in the upstream oil and gas sectors.
We found that PROPER is an effective compliance tool to improve environmental performace of upstream oil and gas companies. The program results in the increase of regulatory compliance awareness mainly due to its incentive reputation encouragement for companies.
A Comparative Study of HSE Culture on the Norwegian and UK Continental Shelves
Authors: Tharaldsen Jorunn-Elise , Mearns Kathryn , Knudsen Knud 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
The objective of the study was to examine: 1) employees safety climate on the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) and Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS, 2) organizational culture (GLOBE scales), 3) self-reported risk-taking behaviour, and 4) trust in colleagues’ and management's commitment to safety. We expected to find (cultural) differences across shelves, across platform and that what you work with, matters. The results were based on a survey carried out on 3 production platforms on the UKCS and 9 production platforms on NCS. The survey included Seawell employees working within wellservices in UK and Norway. The response rate was 67% on both the UKCS (N=165) and NCS (N=605). A combination of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) resulted in a total of 22 factors reported in this paper. Both the GLOBE and the Safety Behaviour scales resulted in two four dimensional models, and the trust scales in a three dimensional model. Structural Equation Modelling indicated that the suggested factor models fitted the data. The overall results showed an organization with high scores on all safety factors. We found support for our hypothesis of (cultural) differences across shelves. The UK respondents report the organization to be more Future oriented and Assertive (Aggressive and Dominant). The results also showed significantly better scores on three out of four Safety behaviour scales for the UK organization. UK workers report higher safety competence, to be more comfortable with confrontations regarding colleagues’ behaviour and higher willingness to stop dangerous work. NCS respondents report higher Reporting willingness, but are markedly more uncomfortable about confronting colleagues on risky behaviour. Both samples report high trust in workmates, supervisor and offshore management. UK respondents have significantly higher scores on supervisor trust. However, the similarities are most striking: Highest trust is reported towards workmates, thereafter trust in first line supervisor and finally, trust in offshore management. We also found support for our two other hypotheses: Where you work (which platform) and with what (discipline) matters for your perceptions on different dimensions.
Getting Grips on Individual HSE Compliance Globally
Authors: Twilhaar Dirk Nijen , de Gier Wouter 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Compliance to HSSE requirements is a condition for successful HSSE management. Unfortunately a lack of transparency of these HSSE requirements often hampers compliance.&#160; Fountain Insight has proven to make HSSE requirements transparent to staff and has simplified management of HSSE compliance by supervisors. Significantly increased compliance levels were reached and maintained by organisations and sites around the world as a result.
Sustainability at an E&P company in Europe—OMV Austria Exploration & Production GmbH
Authors: Paul Jan , Samhaber Reinhart 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Energy companies must respond to the challenges posed by rising energy demand, finite fossil fuel reserves and climate change. OMV is committed to the Triple Bottom Line of sustainability taking economic, environmental and social aspects into account in its decisions and activities.
OMV is committed to identify opportunities in the renewable energy area which can be integrated into the group's business activities. To foster these activities the OMV Future Energy Fund was founded.
OMV Austria produces app. 13.6 MM boe per year. For the production of 1 boe of hydrocarbons 0.049 boe are used. The usage of primary energy is calculated at 58.1 kWh for the production of 1 boe.
OMV discovered with the well Strasshof T4 a sour gas field in the proximity of Vienna in April 2005. Acid gas injection is an integral part of the field development plan. Greenhouse gases emissions will be reduced by more than 150,000 t carbon dioxide per year compared to a conventional process.
At present, OMV operates in Austria approx. 1,000 oil and natural gas wells. Instead of plugging and abandoning them after production, they can be used to produce geothermal energy. A comparison of the emissions between oil, gas and geothermal energy shows a CO2 reduction potential of up to 380 t (3,500 m well vs. fuel oil).
OMV is the biggest investor and employer in the Weinviertel region in the Vienna basin. There is a strong commitment on the local level. One example is the support of the local municipalities which is based on a long term contract. During a devastating flood in April 2006 OMV helped immediately with much needed material and experts.
Safety and the Value of Partnering
Authors: Windhorst G. J. , van der Wilt F. M. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
In the North Sea, Noble Drilling works for a variety of energy companies. One of these partnerships, with Gaz de France Dutch subsidiary GDF Production Nederland B.V. (GDF ProNed) really stands out, because of the extraordinarily good safety records. And it does so in such a degree, that it calls for an explanation. Permanent relationships like these can, in general, only thrive on mutual trust and understanding.
Things that do not speak for themselves in an industry like ours, with its high risks. Economical risks and hazards for health and safety.
So what is the secret of this long-standing relationship, we have asked ourselves. Can something be concluded from it?
The purpose of this paper is to share our practices with the industry and to provide feedback on our approach and the results via the 2008 SPE HSE Conference in Nice.
A Model for Environmental Risk Assessment for the construction of Oil/Gas Processing Facilities in Coastal Areas
Authors: ElSherbiny Ahmed H. , Adly Tarek A. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
An Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) Model is adopted to evaluate the environmental risk associated with the construction of Oil/Gas Processing Facilities in coastal areas. The Model was originally developed by El Sherbiny et al (2006) addressing the construction of tourism projects along the Red Sea coast of Egypt. The model is based on a specially designed network diagram that describes the intermediate links between construction activities and existing ecological/marine receptors. It was designed using a spreadsheet program as a series of hyperlinked spreadsheets navigated by the user.
The proposed model estimates the risk of causing environmental harm to existing ecological receptors, while considering the cumulative effect of different stressors and impacts. It combines Risk Assessment (RA) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) into a unified analysis process. The purpose of such process is neither to produce the most quantitatively sophisticated estimate of a particular risk nor to provide the most comprehensive list of possible environmental impacts. It rather aims at producing a rational and reasonable tool that aids in decision-making.
The model helps in bridging the gap between the acknowledged environmental impacts and generated risk on existing marine/coastal ecological receptors. It assists the project team, in collaboration with the EIA team, in the analysis of different design alternatives and mitigation measures. Based on the model results, activities responsible for high-risk levels could be tracked backwards for better management, where the effect of different mitigation measures could be investigated. Although environmental impacts associated with Oil/Gas projects are generally known, the extent to which ecological/marine receptors are disturbed is still vague. The proposed model contributes significantly to bridging this gap by quantifying associated environmental risk.
Health Risk Register
Authors: Anwar Saleem , Nensey Safdar , Khalid Sohail Irfan 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Risk assessment and practicality of the process is always a challenging task as it requires a considerable time and effort to perform a quantitative risk assessment. Most of the risk assessment models in use requires a holistic approach and are not flexible to be applied at smallest of the operations and activities. Health risk register provides an opportunity to take the process a step ahead towards more practicality and flexibility. It takes the risk assessment to the grass root level of the operations.
Gas Leak Detection Through Infrared Camera
Authors: Kabadeh A. , Al Kamali A. 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
The oil and gas industry produce, process and transport many industrial gases and chemical compounds that are harmful to human health and the environment. These gases include fugitive emissions and volatile organic compounds (vocs) from equipment leak, which cannot be seen by the naked eye, and therefore, often not accounted for. There are various technologies and tools used to monitor these gases and to minimize the associated hazards to the environment. Now there is a new technology that will help the oil and gas industry to detect these dangerous gas leaks – GasFindIR infrared camera.
Measuring The Worldwide Standard Compliance Level with a Quantified Gap Analysis
Authors: Guirguis Maurice 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
The Quantified Gap Analysis (QGA) is an excellent tool for measuring the compliance level with KCA Deutag world wide HSE standard. The compliance level can be measured for a rig / location, country, area, and it can be compiled for a region level. With the results from the QGA, senior Mangers will look at one graph only to determine the compliance and none compliance percentage with each standard for each country and even for each rig/location.
The QGA is applicable for measuring the compliance level with any standard or procedures, such as safety, environment or security standard as well as any work procedures. The QGA can be used as checklist for audit or inspection purposes.
The results from the QGA can be utilised to develop the specific plans for corporate, areas, countries and locations. The plans will stress on the development areas that needs attention in terms of training, support, maintenance or investment.
The QGA will develop an automatic corrective action plan for senior managers to follow up and assure closure of gaps of critical risks.
The QGA is an easy tool for measuring the compliance and non compliance level with any HSE or security standard. It provides all information required in one graph. It helps managers to set plans to improve compliance level and improve HSE records and culture.
Industry and Community working in partnership to provide Waste Solutions
Authors: McKay M. , Sheills I. , Taylor Dan 
Published: April 2008

Abstract
Waste management is a significant environmental challenge facing industry today and waste disposal can represent 4.5% of a Company's turnover (ref.1).
A community education project has established a waste disposal route for wood that not only fulfils the need to find a sustainable outlet for waste wood but also provides training and employment for adults with learning difficulties. Wood collected from onshore and offshore facilities is used in the manufacture of saleable garden and household products. The project, now in its 10th year, is a demonstration of the success that can be achieved when a community project fulfils a business need. It provides a recycling option for waste wood which demonstrates good environmental practice and is significantly cheaper than the cost of landfill. The community project benefits as it is provided with a means of generating income which ensures that continued training and employment are provided to members of the local community. Industry benefits from a sustainable outlet for waste wood while fulfilling corporate social responsibilities.