Cochrane review: Early versus late erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants
Authors: Aher SM , Ohlsson A 
Published: April 2007

AbstractBackgroundHematocrit falls after birth in preterm infants due to physiological factors and frequent blood letting. Low plasma levels of erythropoietin (EPO) in preterm infants provide a rationale for the use of EPO to prevent or treat anaemia.ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of early (before 8 days after birth) versus late (between 8 ‐ 28 days after birth) initiation of EPO in reducing red blood cell transfusions in preterm and/or low birth weight infants.Search strategyThe Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2006) was searched. Electronic and manual searches were conducted in November 2005 of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL, personal files, bibliographies of identified trials and abstracts by the Pediatric Academic Societies' and the European Society of Pediatric Research Meetings published in Pediatric Research.Selection criteriaDesign: Randomized or quasi‐randomized controlled trials. Population: Preterm (< 37 weeks gestational age) or low birth weight infants (< 2500 g) less than eight days of age. Intervention: Early initiation of EPO (initiated at < 8 days of age) vs. late initiation of EPO (initiated at 8 ‐ 28 days of age). Outcomes; At least one of the following outcomes were reported: Use of one or more red blood cell transfusions; Total volume (ml/kg) of blood transfused per infant; Number of transfusions per infant; Number of donors to whom the infant was exposed; Mortality during initial hospital stay (all causes); and common outcomes associated with preterm birth.Data collection and analysisThe standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were followed independently by the authors to assess study quality and report outcomes. Weighted treatment effects, calculated using RevMan 4.2.8 included typical relative risk (RR), typical risk difference (RD), number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB), number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) and mean difference (MD), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed effect model was used for meta‐analyses. Heterogeneity tests including the I‐squared (I2) test were performed to assess the appropriateness of pooling the data.Main resultsTwo high quality randomized double‐blind controlled studies enrolling 262 infants were identified (Donato 2000; Maier 2002). Both studies used well defined, but not identical, criteria for blood transfusions. Between 14 and 32% of the enrolled infants had received blood transfusions prior to study entry. A non‐significant reduction in the 'use one or more red blood cell transfusions' [typical RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.78, 1.06); typical RD ‐ 0.07 (95% CI ‐0.18, 0.04)] favouring early EPO was noted. Both studies (n = 262) reported on “number of transfusions per infant”; early EPO administration resulted in a non‐significant reduction compared to late EPO [typical WMD ‐ 0.32 (95% CI ‐0.92, 0.29)]. There was no significant reduction in total volume of blood transfused per infant or in the number of donors to whom the infant was exposed. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (all stages) was assessed in 191 infants. Early EPO led to a significant increase in the risk of ROP [(typical RR 1.40 (95% CI 1.05, 1.86); typical RD 0.16 (95% CI 0.03, 0.29); NNTH 6 (95% CI 3 ‐33)]. There was statistically significant heterogeneity for this outcome. Both studies (n = 191) reported on ROP stage > 3. No statistically significant increase in risk was noted [typical RR 1.56 (95% CI 0.71, 3.41); typical RD was 0.05 (95% CI ‐ 0.04, 0.14)]. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity for this outcome for either RR or for RD. No other important favourable or adverse neonatal outcomes or side effects were reported.Authors' conclusionsThe use of early EPO did not significantly reduce the primary outcome of “use of one or more red blood cell transfusions”, or “number of transfusions per infant” compared to late EPO administration. Currently there is lack of evidence that early EPO vs. late EPO confers any substantial benefits with regard to any donor blood exposure as a large proportion (14 ‐ 30 %) of infants enrolled in these studies were exposed to donor blood prior to study entry. The finding of a statistically significant increased risk of ROP (any grade) and a similar trend for ROP stage > 3 with early EPO treatment is of great concern. No further studies comparing early vs. late administration of EPO are warranted.Plain Language SummaryThe number of red blood cells falls after birth in preterm infants due to the natural breakdown of erythrocytes and blood letting. Low levels of erythropoietin (EPO), a substance in the blood that stimulates red blood cell production in preterm infants, provide a rationale for the use of EPO to prevent or treat anemia. A total of 262 infants born preterm have been enrolled in two studies of early vs. late administration of EPO to prevent blood transfusions. There were no demonstrable benefits of early vs. late administration of EPO with regards to reduction in the use of red blood cell transfusions, number of transfusions, the amount of red cells transfused or number of donor exposures per infant. However, the use of early EPO compared to late EPO administration increases the risk of retinopathy of prematurity, a serious complication in babies born before term. Currently, there is lack of evidence that either treatment confers any substantial benefits with regard to any donor blood exposure, as many infants enrolled in both studies were exposed to donor blood prior to study entry, and early EPO increases the risk of retinopathy of prematurity. Neither early nor late administration of EPO is recommended.