THE SPERMATOZOA OF THE POLYCHAETA (ANNELIDA): AN ULTRASTRUCTURAL REVIEW
Authors: JAMIESON B. G. M. , ROUSE G. W. 
Published: January 2008

Summary1. Polychaete sperm are divisible into ect‐aquasperm, ent‐aquasperm, and introsperm.2. Ect‐aquasperm are the commonest type of polychaete sperm and are considered plesiomorphic for the Polychaeta. Re‐evolution of ect‐aquasperm (as neo‐aquasperm) is, nevertheless, tentatively hypothesized for some Sabellida.3. In terms of ultrastructural studies of sperm in the investigated polychaete families, only ect‐aquasperm have been demonstrated for 16 families; only ent‐aquasperm for 3 families; ect‐ and ent‐aquasperm for 3; ect‐ and intro‐sperm for 2; ect‐, ent‐ and intro‐sperm for 1 family; and only introsperm for 11 families but investigations can only be regarded as preliminary. To date no family is known to have ent‐ and intro‐sperm only. Sperm ultrastructure has yet to be examined in the orders Magelonida, Psammodrilida, Cossurida, Spintherida, Sternapsida, Flabelligerida and Fauvelopsida.4. Much variation occurs in gross morphology, ultrastructure and configuration of the several components of ect‐aquasperm: acrosome, nucleus, mitochondria, and centrioles and associated anchoring apparatus. A 9 + 2 axoneme is constant.5. Group‐specific sperm structure has been demonstrated for the Nereidae (chiefly ect‐aquasperm), and for introsperm of the families Histriobdellidae, Questidae; Capitellidae, Spionidae and Protodrilidae. Species‐specificity of all classes of spermatozoa is well established.6. The very small size of ect‐aquasperm is correlated with production of large numbers of sperm as an adaptation to broadcast spawning. Simplicity of structure may relate more to conservation of materials than to hydrodynamics.7. Fertilization by ent‐aquasperm requires fewer eggs than in external fertilization and is accompanied by a tendency to lecithotrophy. Elongation of the nucleus and development of asymmetry are seen in several of the few known examples of ent‐aquasperm. Whether modifications are related to transfer or to other features, such as lecithotrophy, is uncertain.8. Evident multiple origins of polychaete introsperm contraindicate their value in establishing relationship between families, in contrast with their utility in groups such as decapod Crustacea.9. At the intrafamilial level polychaete introsperm have taxonomic and phylogenetic value, as seen in the Spionidae, Capitellidae, and Histriobdellidae, and are distinctive of each of these and other families.10. At higher taxonomic levels, the ultrastructure of the sperm of the oligochaetoid Questidae distinguishes this family from euclitellates, each class of which has its own distinctive subtype of the euclitellate introsperm.11. A number of categories of polychaete introsperm, with examples, are recognized: those which differ from ect‐aquasperm chiefly in elongation of the nucleus; approximately spheroidal, non‐motile sperm; sperm with superficially ‘primitive’ facies but in fact modified; and filiform flagellate or aflagellate sperm.12. Filiform development and extreme modification appear often to be related to transdermal insemination but may also be adaptive to packaging in spermatophores and seminal receptacles.13. Polychaetes exemplify multiple and pronounced parallel evolutionary modification of both reproductive biology and sperm structure which must have contributed substantially to the evolutionary success of the Polychaeta.