Prognostic significance of ctDNA mutation analysis in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Authors: Lee Soo Jung , Jia Shidong , Du Pan , Lee Jeeyeon , Kang Byeongju , Lee In Hee , Chae Yee Soo , Park Ho Yong , Park Jee-Young Nora , Chung Liam IL Young , Zheng Tiantian , Tan Lu , Chae Young Kwang 
Published: May 2024

e12654 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with dual anti-HER2 agents followed by surgical resection is the standard treatment for stage II-III HER2- positive breast cancer (BC). Despite the availability of effective therapies such as ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and neratinib, identifying patients at high risk of disease recurrence remains challenging. To evaluate whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be used as a biomarker to assess treatment response in patients with HER2-positive EBC treated with neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. ctDNA burden can serve as a useful determinant for escalating or de-escalating (neo)adjuvant strategy in EBC patients. This study aimed to assess the role of ctDNA mutation analysis using low-pass whole-genome sequencing (lpWGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) in evaluating blood copy-number burden (bCNB), genomic alterations, mutational signatures, blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB), and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. Methods: A total of 46 HER2-positive BC patients who underwent NACT combined with dual anti-HER2 agents and surgical resection were enrolled, including 28 clinical stage II and 17 III patients. Plasma samples were collected at four time points: before NACT, after 3 cycles, at the completion of NACT, and after surgery. lpWGS was utilized to assess bCNB, while WES was performed to evaluate genomic alterations, mutational signatures, and bTMB. Mutations selected from the baseline sample were monitored for MRD. In cases where lpWGS yielded negative results, targeted NGS sequencing was conducted. Somatic mutations are identified by whole exome sequencing across 20,000 genes (with boosted sequencing coverage for 600 cancer-related genes). Between 4-50 personalized somatic mutations or fusions are selected for each patient. This personalized panel together with a fixed MRD core panel is utilized for MRD detection and monitoring. Results: Among the enrolled patients, nodal metastasis was observed in 29 patients and 29 were hormone receptor-positive, and 36 achieved pCR (78.2%). Positive ctDNA was detected 58.8% of patients. Higher nodal stage was associated with ctDNA positivity at baseline. MRD positivity after chemotherapy was observed in 4 patients and 2 patients achieved pCR TP53 was the most frequently altered gene, followed by PIK3CA, MAP3K1, REV3L, MYC, MAP2K4, ERBB3, ATRX, ATM and ALK. This pattern is comparable to that observed in previous studies on BC. Non-PCR patients commonly exhibit MAP3K1 and MAP2K4 alteration is their ctDNA. Conclusions: The identification of MRD, regardless of pCR status, can be valuable for risk stratification and personalized treatment decision-making. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore the clinical implications of ctDNA mutation analysis in HER2-positive BC management.