P2-08-12: Additional Lesion Found in Preoperative Breast MRI; Is Routine Use Justified?
Authors: Kim J , You J , Shin H , Ahn S , Moon H-G , Cho N , Moon W-K , Han W , Noh D 
Published: June 2012

Abstract
Preoperative breast MRI has been increasingly performed in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer due to its high sensitivity in assessing the extent and additional malignant foci. But due to it's low specificity, role of routine preoperative breast MRI has become an issue. In this study we aught to analyze the characteristics of the additional lesion found in preoperative breast MRI and to evaluate the clinicopathological factors in association with likelihood of having additional malignancy.
We retrospectively reviewed 2491 patients who undergone surgery due to breast cancer in Seoul National University Hospital(SNUH) between Jan 2006 and Dec 2010. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy cases, patients undergone initial sonography in other center or ones with prior excision were excluded and total 1068 patients were analyzed. The additional lesion was defined as the lesion not found in initial sonography and detected in preoperative breast MRI. The pathology of the additional lesion was reviewed and the association between the clinicopathologic factors and additional malignancy were evaluated. Accuracy of breast MRI was estimated regarding cancer yield, positive predictive value(PPV).
Mean age at diagnosis was 50.9 years (21 to 85 years). Overall detection rate of additional lesion was 26.2%(280 out of 1068). Mean size of the additional lesion was 9.8mm(3-51). Additional lesions consist of 99(35.4% of 280) C4 or higher, 174(62.1% of 280) below C4, 7(2.5% of 280) C0 lesions. Among them 100 patients undergone onstage surgery. 5(55% of 100) lesions were in ipsilateral breast and 45(45% of 100) in contralateral breast. Breast conserving surgery and mastectomy rate of the 100 onstage-operation group was 36% versus 64% and 64.6% versus 35.4% in total 1068 patients, showing no significant change of operation method of the primary cancer owing to additional lesion.
Among the 100 patients, 54(19.3% of 280) were benign, 3(1.1% of 280) were atypical ductal hyperplasia, 13(4.6% of 280) were in situ carcinoma, 19(6.8% of 280) were invasive carcinoma and 11(3.9% of 280) were unknown. Cancer yield was 2.99%(32 out of 1068) and PPV of preoperative breast MRI was 39.0%(31 out of 82).
In univariate analysis, young age and premenopausal patients showed to have higher rate of additional cancer found in MRI(p=0.022, p=0.036). Breast density, size and LN status of the primary cancer didn't show significancy and neither the hormone receptor status with each p value 0.705, 0.381, 0.973, 0.375 respectively. Lobular carcinoma(ILC or mixed IDC with ILC) and low grade carcinoma showed significancy of having additional malignancy (p=0.019, 0.022). In multivariate analysis age, low grade carcinoma and lobular carcinoma showed independent association with p value 0.014, 0.039, 0.035 respectively(HR 0.95, 95%CI:0.94 o 0.99),(HR 0.39, 95%CI:0.16 to 0.96),(HR 5.66, 95%CI:1.13 to 28.39).
Routine preoperative breast MRI use can result in overtreatment also with delay in surgical management. In our data, younger age, low grade carcinoma, lobular carcinoma showed independent association having additional malignant foci in breast MRI. With the basis of mammography and sonography, preoperative breast MRI should only be done when additional gain is considered to overcome the flaws.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-12.