bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Single versus double transseptal puncture for pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation - insights from "Go for Zero Fluoroscopy" registry
Authors: Miskowiec D , Qawoq H D , Zycinski P , Kosiuk J , Chudzik M , Kasprzak J D 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Background
Transseptal puncture is one of the most challenging steps in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) because of the potential risk of complication. While single TSP reduces the puncture-related risk, double TSP simplifies the procedure (immediate signal visualization in pulmonary veins, avoidance of multiple changes of catheters through the single sheath). The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of single versus double TSP during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation for AF on the fluoroscopy usage and procedure time.

Methods
Data reported from the international, multicenter prospective „Go For Zero Fluoroscopy Registry" performed in years 2018–2019 were analyzed. Overall 25 European electrophysiology centers from 14 countries and up to 5 operators from each center were enrolled. Only isolated PVI procedures were analyzed.

Results
A total data of 393 PVI RF procedures were collected from 25 centers. The median dose-area-product (DAP), fluoroscopy time and overall procedure time were: 810 (325 – 1839) cGy*cm2, 8 (4 – 14) minutes and 124 (92 – 168) minutes, respectively. Single TSP was associated with significantly higher DAP: 984 (459 – 1939) vs 667 (227 – 1469) cGy*cm2 (p=0.002), longer fluoroscopy time: 11 (6 – 19) vs 6 (3 – 11) minutes (p&lt;0.001) and longer overall procedure time: 133 (103 – 168) vs 110 (90 – 168) minutes (p=0.003) as compared with double TSP. Single and double TSP group did not differ significantly in regards of general anesthesia usage, circular and multipolar mapping catheter use (p&gt;0.05). However, single TSP was performed by operators with longer EP lab experience: 10 (4 – 15) vs 3 (0 – 10) years (p&lt;0,001).

Conclusions
Double TSP is related with lower fluoroscopy usage and shorter overall procedure time of pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Acute clinical outcomes of patients with HFpEF undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation
Authors: Ismaili D , Kany S , Obergassel S , Varnhorn L , Venedey N , Pinnschmidt H , Rottner L , Moser F , Lemoine M , My I , Riess J , Reissmann B , Kirchhof P , Metzner M , Rillig A 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Aim
Robust data show that atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can improve left ventricular function and prevent cardiovascular complications in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The effectiveness and safety of AF ablation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less well characterized.

Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 785 consecutive patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing AF ablation in a high-volume center including 251 with AF and HFpEF. We compared baseline parameters, procedural details and procedural complications by heart failure status.

Results
Patients with HFpEF (n=251/785) were older (median age 70 years vs. 64 years; p &lt; 0.05) and more frequently female (48.2% vs. 32.2%; p &lt; 0.05) compared to patients without HF. Symptom severity was comparable with a median European Heart Rhythm Association score of 2 in both groups (p &gt; 0.05). Arterial (71.7% vs. 59.7%, p &lt; 0.05), diabetes (16.7% vs. 9.4%, p &lt; 0.05) and dyslipidemia (41.4% vs. 27.2%, p &lt; 0.05) were more common in patients with AF and HFpEF. Acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was achieved in all patients using cryoballoon or radiofrequency energy with similar frequency in both groups (cryoballoon ablation: 37.8% vs. 41.6%; p &gt; 0.05). A subgroup of patients in both groups additionally underwent cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for coexistent atrial flutter (26% vs. 20.7%; p &gt; 0.05). Procedure times (119.4 ± 47.7 min vs. 120.2 ± 48.3 min; p &gt; 0.05) and fluoroscopy times (15.8 ± 10.4 min vs. 15.5 ± 7.1 min; p &gt; 0.05) were comparable. Overall complication rates did not differ (12.7% vs. 10.3%; p &gt; 0.05). While the incidence of pericardial tamponades was slightly higher (2% vs. 0%), other severe and minor complications showed no significant differences, including stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA; 0.4% vs. 0.6%), major life-threatening bleeding (0% vs. 0.2%), vascular complications (1.6% vs. 2.1%), phrenic nerve palsy (0.8% vs. 1.5%), and pulmonary vein stenosis (0.4 vs. 0%). The mean in-hospital stay for the procedure was 2 days in both groups (p &gt; 0.05). In-hospital recurrence rates were similar (12.4% vs. 17%; p &gt; 0.05), as was the need for electrical cardioversion before discharge (5.6% vs. 6.6%; p &gt; 0.05).

Conclusion
Patients with HFpEF undergoing AF ablation were older, more frequently female, and have more comorbidities than patients without heart failure. Acute procedural success and acute complication rates appear low. These data encourage randomized evaluations of the safety and efficacy of ablation-based rhythm control therapy in patients with AF and HFpEF.
Severity of tricuspid regurgitation predicts risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation
Authors: Bismpos D , Wintrich J , Teusch A , Pavlicek V , Fischer P , Mahfoud F , Boehm M , Ukena C 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Background
Atrioventricular valve regurgitation (AVVR) results in atrial remodeling, thus promoting the formation of a substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF). On the other hand, AF may cause functional AVVR by annular dilatation of the atria. In this vicious circle, the identification of the leading pathomechanism and consequently the optimization of treatment can be challenging.

Purpose
Our aim was to investigate whether the presence of significant AVVR and especially of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) affects the efficacy of catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for AF. Furthermore, we evaluated whether rhythm control for AF through PVI could lead to an improvement of AVVR severity. Finally we examined the effect of concomitant right atrial flutter on the arrhythmic outcome in patients with significant TR .

Methods
We enrolled patients undergoing first-time PVI for symptomatic AF. We compared the severity of AVVR at the time of the procedure as well as after 6 months, using transthoracic echocardiography. Moderate to severe AVVR was defined as significant. Moreover, we evaluated whether the presence of significant AVVR, at baseline and 6 months after the procedure, could serve as an independent predictor for AF recurrence.

Results
Out of 320 consecutive patients (mean age 66.3 ± 10 years, 61.6% male, 60% paroxysmal AF) , significant TR at baseline was documented in 13.1%, while significant mitral regurgitation (MR) in 10.9%. Six months after PVI, the proportion of patients with moderate to severe TR (13.1% to 7.2%; p&lt;0.001) and MR (10.9% to 6.6%; p&lt;0.001) decreased significantly. Compared to patients with post-interventional improvement of significant TR, right atrial (RA) dilatation at baseline was more pronounced in patients with persistent significant TR (RA area 20.2 ± 4.4 vs. 26.6 ± 8.3 cm2; p=0.002). The presence of significant TR, particularly without improvement during the follow-up, independently increased the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrences. Even after propensity-score matching, TR at baseline remained an independent risk predictor regarding recurrent atrial fibrillation (HR 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1 - 4.9]; p=0.045). Among patients with significant TR, those with documented right atrial flutter were at high risk for recurrence of atrial arrhythmia (HR 2.69 [95% CI, 1.0 – 6.9]; p=0.039), despite the additional ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus. Significant MR was not associated with increased risk of atrial arrhythmias.

Conclusion
In patients with symptomatic AF undergoing PVI, the presence of moderate to severe TR, particularly without improvement 6 months after the procedure, was associated with a worse arrhythmic outcome. Further investigations to enhance the understanding of the underlying electrophysiological substrate and the need for tailored ablation strategies are warranted.TR as predictor for AF(propensity score)AVVR improvement after PVI
Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation: 3-year follow-up data from the prolonged Norwegian randomized study of persistent atrial fibrillation (NO-PERSAF study)
Authors: Wollner K , Rossvoll O , Tande P , Solheim E , Schuster P , Chen J 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Background
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is still regarded as a cornerstone for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Both radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) are frequently employed to achieve PVI. Similar results of both techniques have been reported during short follow-up, but clinical outcomes for long-term follow-up from randomized trials are still missing.

Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PVI performed with CBA compared with RFA in patients with persistent AF over 3 years.

Methods
For the NO-PERSAF study, 101 patients (63.2±8.6 years old, 80 male, 21 female), with persistent AF (77 persistent AF, 24 long-standing persistent AF) referred to PVI were randomized (1:1) to CBA or RFA and followed for 12 months. All patients participating in the NO-PERSAF study were invited to an extended outpatient evaluation with 12-lead ECG and 7-day Holter. The primary endpoint was any documented recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) lasting longer than 30 s during 3 years after the index ablation procedure (following a 3-month blanking period). The ATA-free survival curves were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by log-rank test.

Results
One patient crossed over from CBA to RFA group because of equipment problem during index ablation procedure. 99 of the original 101 patients responded (1 died of non-cardiovascular diseases, 1 lost). Freedom from ATA was achieved in 51 (50.5%) of the 101 patients, 28 (54.9%) out of 51 patients in the CBA group and 23 (46.0%) out of 50 patients in the RFA group (Figure 1). No difference of ATA recurrence was found between the two groups (p=0.327). There was significantly (p=0.031) less atrial flutter in the CBA group (7.8%; 4 atypical) compared with the RFA group (22%; 10 atypical, 1 typical).
28 patients received repeat ablations with RFA during the follow-up period, 15 in the CBA group and 13 in the RFA group (1 twice). Freedom from ATA after multiple ablations was achieved in 74 (73.3%) of the 101 patients, 40 (78.4%) out of the 51 patients in the CBA group and 34 (68.0%) out of the 50 patients in the RFA group. No difference of ATA recurrence was found between the two groups (p=0.178, Figure 2) after multiple ablations with RFA for AF and atrial flutter. Noticeably, 2 patients in the CBA group and none in the RFA group received atrioventricular nodal ablation after permanent pacemaker implantation.

Conclusions
Compared to RFA, PVI performed with CBA showed similar outcome of freedom from ATA over a long-term follow-up of 3 years. However, the incidence of atrial flutter was significantly lower in the CBA group.Figure 1Figure 2
Left atrial low-voltage area is associated with poor rhythm outcome and poor efficacy of left atrial additional ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation
Authors: Matsuda Y , Masuda M , Uematsu H , Sugino A , Ooka H , Kudo S , Fujii S , Asai M , Okamoto S , Ishihara T , Nanto K , Tsujimura T , Hata Y , Higashino N , Mano T 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Background
Although left atrial additional ablation other than pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is often performed in order to modify arrhythmogenic substrate, rhythm outcome in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LS-PerAF) is still challenging. Left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) is correlated with degeneration of atrial myocardium, and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following catheter ablation. However, in patients with LS-PerAF, the association between the prevalence of LVAs and rhythm outcome has not been clarified. We hypothesized that AF recurrence after AF ablation more frequently occurred in patients with LVAs than in those without, and that the prevalence of LVAs was associated with the efficacy of left atrial additional ablation.

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the prevalence of LVAs and rhythm outcome or efficacy of left atrial additional ablation in patients with LS-PerAF ablation.

Methods
In total, 123 (age, 66 ± 9 years; female, 28 [23%]) consecutive patients who underwent initial ablation for LS-PerAF were included. Left atrial additional ablation was defined as an ablation for left atrium other than PV isolation and ablation for non-PV foci. The definition of LVAs was sites with a bipolar voltage of &lt;0.5 mV covering ≥5 cm² of left atrium. Rhythm outcome after the catheter ablation was followed for 24 months.

Results
LVAs was found in 31 (25%) patients, and left atrial additional ablation was performed for 31 (25%) patients. Freedom from AF recurrence was significantly lower in patients with LVAs than in those without (Figure 1A). In contrast, freedom from AF recurrence was similar between patients with left atrial additional ablation and those without (Figure 1B). In patients without LVAs, freedom from AF recurrence was significantly higher in patients with left atrial additional ablation than in those without (Figure 2A). On the contrary, in patients with LVAs, freedom from AF recurrence during was similar between patients with left atrial additional ablation and those without (Figure 2B).

Conclusions
In patients undergoing LS-PerAF ablation, AF recurrence more frequently occurred in patients with LVAs than in those without. Only in patients without LVAs, freedom from AF recurrence was significantly higher in patients with left atrial additional ablation than in those without.Figure 1Figure 2
Durability of pulmonary vein isolation after radiofrequency-balloon ablation
Authors: Plank K , Schaack D , Tohoku S , Bordignon S , Chen S , Urbanek L , Schmidt B , Chun K R J 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Aims
Recently a multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon (RFB) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was introduced. To the best of our knowledge no data on PVI durability has yet been published.

Objectives
The aim of this single-center study was to investigate the incidence of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnectionafter RFB-guided PVI.

Methods
Patients undergoing second ablation for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) following the initial RFB-PVI were investigated. Left arial (LA) electroanatomic mapping was used. The rate of PV reconnection, the type of recurrent ATaand procedural data were analyzed.

Results
Among 178 patients treated with RFB, 21 patients underwent a second procedure 11 ± 6 months after the initial PVI. 67% of these patients presented with atrial fibrillation (AF), 33% with atrial tachycardia. Regarding baseline characteristics, 71% of these patients were male, mean age was 67±10, mean BMI was 28±5, 67% had hypertension and 33% had coronary artery disease.
Overall, 83 PVs including one left common PV (LCPV) were assessed. The rate of PV reconnection was 28% (23/83 PVs). 57% of patients (12/21) had at least one reconnected PV. Patient with PV-reconnection had more AF recurrence and less often atrial tachycardia (AT) (AF: 75%, AT: 25%) than patients with durably isolated PVs (AF: 56%, AT: 44%).
Most reconnections were detected in septal PVs. Reconnections were distributed as follows: RIPV: 8/21, RSPV: 7/21, LIPV: 5/20, LSVP: 3/20, LCPV: 0/1.
Precise localization of the gaps could be identified in 15/23 PVs. Most common gap locations were at the anterior carina (4/15) for septal PVs and anterior-inferior (3/15) at the LIPV. Ablation strategy was pure PV reisolation in 8/12 patients and PV reisolation with additional linear lesions in 4/12 patients. All patients with durably isolated PVs were treated with additional substrate modification. In total, following additional lesions were set: anterior line: 6, roof line: 11, cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI): 7, LAA-Isolation: 1, free wall of the right atrium: 1.
Regarding procedural data of the index procedure, the number of applications was not a statistically significant predictor of reconnection (p=0.77).

Conclusion
We provide the first insight into durability of PVI after radiofrequency-balloon ablation. 72% of all PVs were still isolated. Our data on gap localization might help to identify regions where optimal balloon contact is difficult to achieve. More data on this topic might reveal predictors for PV reconnections.
The impact of additional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation substrates using with ExTRa-Mapping analysis after Cryo-ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
Authors: Akita T , Yoshida A , Kim Y , Matsuura T , Nishijo K , Takada K , Suzuki M , Takahashi Y , Terashita D , Tsuda S , Tagashira T , Takami K , Yamada S 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Background
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established. Cryo-ablation for persistent AF has been reported to be safe and effective and comparable to radiofrequency (RF) ablation in long term arrhythmia-free survival, but the outcome is limited. Phase mapping using software of ExTRa-Mapping is a new tool to clarify the real-time imaging of the AF wave dynamics.

Purpose
We investigated the distribution of rotors of left atrium (LA) after PVI by Cryo-ablation, and the efficacy and safety of additional RF ablation for AF substrates (rotor modification) after Cryo-ablation.

Methods
A total of 50 patients who underwent persistent AF ablation in our hospital were enrolled. The Cryo-ablation alone group (Cryo group; n=25) and the Cryo-ablation + additional RF substrates ablation group (Cryo+RF group; n=25) were randomly divided. First, PVI with Cryo-ablation was performed. Second, if AF did not term after PVI, the rotor of LA were analyzed using the NAVX and ExTRa-Mapping system. In Cryo+RF group, the extensive RF ablation of the PV antrum to modify the rotor area were performed (Abstract Picture 1). The recurrence rate of any atrial tachy-arrhythmia without anti-arrhythmic drugs and safety were evaluated in both groups.

Results
The patient characteristics (69 ± 9.2 years old, body-mass index 24 ± 3.2 kg/m2, LA diameter 43 ± 5.1 mm, left ventricular ejection fraction 60 ± 7.8 %, persistent AF duration 4.2 ± 5.1 months) did not differ between the both groups. The distribution of rotors of LA were predominantly present in the anterior (n = 36) and inferior (n = 27) walls of the LA, with only a few in the posterior wall (n = 7) in the both groups. In Cryo+RF group, except for 4 cases in which AF was termed by PVI or a rotor was not detected, extensive RF modification in anterior antrum of right pulmonary vein was performed in 18 of 21 cases. In an average follow-up of 482 ± 273 days, the recurrence rate of any atrial tachy-arrhythmia was significantly lower in Cryo+RF group compared with Cryo group (p=0.029, Abstract Picture 2). No serious complications occurred in both groups.

Conclusion
Additional extensive RF ablation of the PV antrum to modify the Rotor area resulted in a lower recurrence rate in patients with persistent AF.Modify the rotor areaRecurrence rate
Predictive value of guideline-referred risk scores in estimating left atrial low voltage areas and recurrence of atrial fibrillation in repeat ablation procedures
Authors: Georgi C , Bannehr M , Lochmann M , Reiners D , Haase-Fielitz A , Seifert M , Butter C 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Background
Despite advances in mapping and ablation techniques, atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence remains a challenge after pulmonary vein isolation. Low voltage areas (LVA) in the left atrium are associated with higher recurrence rates after left atrial ablation. Risk scores for evaluating post-ablation recurrences are not well established, although a better patient selection for repeat procedures would be of great help in clinical practice.

Purpose
Risk scores for prediction of AF recurrence have not been tested in a cohort of repeat ablations.

Methods
This single-center study includes consecutive patients from the prospective Bernau ablation registry undergoing ultra-high-density (UHD) mapping and repeat ablation for AF/AT recurrence between 2016 and 2020. The potential of seven guideline mentioned risk scores (APPLE, DR-FLASH, MB-LATER, ATLAS, CAAP-AF, BASE-AF 2, ALARMEc) to predict (1) AF/AT recurrence beyond a three-months blanking period after repeat left atrial ablation (Re-PVI ± further LA ablation) and (2) the percentage of left atrial LVA in UHD mapping was investigated. LVA were defined as sites with a bipolar peak-to-peak voltage of &lt;0.5 mV with an extent of &gt;1cm². Optimal cutoff for sensitivity and specificity for LVA and AF/AT recurrence as endpoint was chosen using C statistics with receiver-operator characteristics (ROC). Further ROCs were performed to illustrate the predictive ability of the scores. Pearson correlation was used to test associations between variables.

Results
160 patients (mean age 67.9 ± 9.1 years, 60.6% persistent AF, mean AF duration 4.6 ± 3.8 years) with complete left atrial UHD mappings (mean EGMs 9754 ± 5808) were included. Overall recurrence rate over a mean follow-up time of 16 ± 11 months was 55.6%. The predictive value of the investigated risk scores on AF/AT recurrence in our cohort was low (Table 1), with the highest power for CAAP-AF (p = 0.015, AUC = 0.615) and DR-FLASH score (p = 0.040, AUC = 0.594), Figure 1. With respect to left atrial LVA we found a better predictive power for the CAAP-AF (p &lt; 0.001, AUC 0.702), APPLE (p &lt; 0.001, AUC 0.687), DR-FLASH (p &lt; 0.001, AUC 0.688), ATLAS (p = 0.005, AUC 0.634) and ALARMEc (p = 0.007, AUC 0.608) score to predict low voltage based on a calculated cut-off of 22% of total left atrial surface (Figure 1).

Conclusion
The predictive value of guideline-referred risk scores in estimating AF/AT recurrence after repeat ablation is low and does not seem to be of relevant help in patient selection for further interventional treatment. Some scores demonstrate a fairly good prediction for the amount of left atrial LVA and therefore might help in choosing the right mapping and ablation regime beforehand.