Impact of magnetic data collection prior to electroanatomic model creation on acute outcomes in de novo AF procedures
Authors: Lo M , Loguidice M , Di Cori A , Coluccia G , Palmisano P , Burns M , Wenzel E , Gaeta L 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Background
As ablation and electroanatomical mapping technology evolve, workflows change to maximize the impact on procedural efficacy, safety, and efficiency. In a magnetic-primary navigation mode, optimization of the magnetic-impedance field links (VoXels) must be considered to provide accurate environments for anatomic modeling, mapping, and lesion placement. To achieve this accuracy and optimize speed of data collection, many operators have adopted the strategy of collecting VoXels using an ablation catheter prior to introduction of a multipolar mapping catheter. However, the impact of this workflow on procedural metrics has not yet been quantified in a multicenter, international cohort.

Objective
Assess the impact of optimizing the magnetic navigation field using an ablation catheter prior to collecting left atrial (LA) data using a high-density diagnostic tool on acute outcomes in de novo atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures.

Methods
Acute observational data from 199 de novo pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) cases was prospectively collected from 56 operators at 42 centers in Europe, the US, and Australia. Procedural metrics, modeling workflow, ablation technology used, and acute outcomes were collected.

Results
Of 199 de novo AF (62.3% PAF) ablation procedures, VoXels were collected with an ablation catheter prior to LA map collection with a multipolar catheter in 65/199 (32.7%) cases; the remainder collected with multipolar catheter first. An irrigated, contact force sensing RF ablation catheter was used in all procedures. Mean procedure duration was similar in procedures in which VoXels were collected prior to map collection (VC) compared to those that did not (nVC) (107.0±46.8 min and 115.4±59.2 min, respectively (p=0.28)). Mean fluoroscopy time was significantly reduced in VC cases compared to nVC cases (3.0±4.5 min and 5.3±5.6 min, respectively (p=0.002)). Total RF duration was significantly reduced in VC cases compared to nVC cases (904±444s and 1063±632s, respectively (p=0.04)). There was also a significant reduction in fluid delivered through the ablation catheter in VC cases, 369±159mL, compared to nVC cases, 520±243mL (p&lt;0.001). Acute success rates were similar between groups: 98.5% for VC cases and 99.2% for nVC cases (p=0.64).

Conclusion
In this international cohort, cases where VoXels were collected prior to map and model collection had significantly reduced fluoroscopy times, RF durations, and fluid volumes delivered through the ablation catheter, potentially as a result of improved model quality. Despite the introduction of an additional step to the workflow, there was a trend toward shorter procedures when VoXels were collected prior to map and model collection, although it did not achieve statistical significance. Better quantification of the impact of this workflow on model quality, along with analysis of long-term patient outcomes, is warranted.Procedure Duration Comparison_VC vs. nVCFluoroscopy Comparison_VC vs. nVC