Abstract 2697: Enhanced antitumor effect of combination intravesical BCG plus Docetaxel therapy in an orthotopic bladder cancer model
Authors: Horinaga Minoru , Fukuyama Ryuichi , Iida Masahiro , Matsushima Masashi , Yanaihara Hiroshi , Nakahira Yoko , Ueno Munehisa , Asakura Hirotaka 
Published: June 2012

Abstract
Introduction and Objective: Little progress in the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has been made. We explored the combination of intravesical BCG plus Doc in an orthotopic model.
Methods: An orthotopic murine bladder cancer model was used. To assess the antitumoral effect of Doc, intravesical Doc therapy was administered at various dose-escalating concentrations: 0 μg (control: PBS), 25 μg, 50 μg and 100 μg (n = 12 for each group; total of 4 groups). Next, a comparative evaluation of tumor growth among the control group, the BCG-alone group, the Doc-alone group, and three combined BCG + Doc groups (a coincident group [CO] and two sequential groups) was performed (n = 12 for each group; total of 6 groups). The sequential combined groups consisted of SA group (SA; Doc administration followed by BCG administration on the next day) and an SB group (SB; BCG administration followed by Doc administration on the next day). Intravesical therapy was administered at 3-day intervals starting on day 5 and was repeated 5 times. To evaluate proliferation, T cell infiltration and apoptosis among the different groups, the tumor cells in the animal model were stained for Ki-67, CD8 and Cleaved caspase 3 after 4 instillations performed every 3 days.
Results: In the Doc groups (12 mice each) treated with a dose of 0 μg (survival period: 32.3 ± 9.4 days), 25 μg (36.8 ± 11.4), 50 μg (38.1 ± 11.0) or 100 μg (40.0 ± 12.7), one, two, two and three mice failed to develop tumors and survived, respectively. The survival advantage for intravesical Doc in the 100 μg administration group was statistically significant when compared with that in the control group (p = 0.04). Out of the 12 mice in each group treated with control, Doc-alone, BCG-alone or combined Doc + BCG (CO, SA, SB), 1, 2, 1, 4, 4 and 1 mice failed to develop tumors and survived, respectively. Significant survival advantages were observed in the combined BCG + Doc group (CO: 50.7 ± 9.0, SA: 51.5 ± 6.9) compared with that in the BCG-alone group (33.1 ± 10.4) and the Doc-alone group (38.8 ± 11.5). The Ki-67 index of the cancer cells was significantly lower in the combined group, compared with that in the BCG-alone group (p &lt; 0.0001), the Doc-alone group (p &lt; 0.05) and the control group (p &lt; 0.0001). BCG-alone significantly increased the number of CD8+ T cells (p &lt; 0.05), while Doc-alone reduced the number of CD8+ T cells (p &lt; 0.05), compared with that in the control. Apoptosis was significantly increased when Doc was administrated to the animals irrespective of the presence (p &lt; 0.05) or absence (p &lt; 0.05) of BCG instillation.
Conclusions: Our results suggested that the combination of BCG and Doc treatment decreased the tumor appearance rate and improved the survival period. The enhancement in tumor growth inhibition enabled by combination regimens was presumably associated with a reduction in the tumor proliferation rate and might not depend on either CD8+ T cells or apoptosis.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2697. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2697