Abstract B64: Analysis of somatic copy number alterations among African American patients with multiple myeloma using array CGH
Authors: Baker Angela S. , Chapman Michael , Braggio Esteban , Keats Jonathan , Mfuko Bunmi , Ahmann Gregory , Sanmugam Vijayalakshmi , Salhia Bodour , Moore Anna , Chewning Kendria , Levy Joan , Perkins Louise , Auclair Daniel , Golub Todd , Bergsagel P. Leif , Fonseca Rafael , Trent Jeffrey , Carpten John 
Published: December 2010

Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of the plasma cells in the bone marrow. Although rare, MM is a deadly form of cancer with a 5 year survival rate of only 37%. African Americans (AA) are twice as likely to be diagnosed with and die from MM as compared to European Americans (EA). Socioeconomic factors may contribute to this disparity, however, biological factors may also be an influence. We have identified somatic copy number alterations in MM as a part of the Multiple Myeloma Genomics Initiative by profiling 250 MM tumors using array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Using this cohort, we identified 16 African American and 180 European American patients using a MMRC database that indicated the racial demographics of each patient. To determine if somatic alterations may play a role in the disparity in incidence and/or severity of MM in AA, we compared the frequency of specific chromosomal aberrations in genes and genomic regions found to be involved in progression and poor outcome. The number of events of occurring was calculated and a univariate analysis was conducted using the Fisher's exact test. P-values were used to determine statistical significance. Results revealed significant differences for chromosome 1 p alterations. Specifically, homozygous deletion at the p18 locus at 1 p occurred in 12.5% (2/16) of tumors from AA patients and 2.8% (5/180) of EA patient tumors (p = 0.045). Further stratification of tumors by hyperdiploid or non-hyperdiploid status revealed significant differences in p18 homozygous deletion. Homozygous deletion of p18 was found in 25% (2/8) of AA patients and only 1.2% (1/83) of EA patients with non-hyperdiploid tumors (p=3.2 × 10-4). A nominally significant difference among non-hyperdiploid patients was also present for overall 1 p deletion, which was observed in 2/8 (25%) of AA non-hyperdiploid tumors and 33/83 (40%) of EA with non-hyperdiploid tumors (p=0.05). No differences were observed for 1 p deletion or p18 homozygous deletion among hyperdiploid tumors between AA and EA patients. We then combined our AA dataset with an independent dataset of 8 AA MM patients generated at the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale AZ and repeated the analysis. Interestingly, very little or no aberrations were found in the dataset from the Mayo Clinic, however, differences of p18 homozygous deletion and 16q deletion among AA and EA remained statistically significant. To determine the correlation between hemizygous and biallelic loss of p18 and poor prognosis we used the 70 gene signature (Shaughnessy, et al., 2007) as a surrogate to identify patients with poor prognosis within the Multiple Myeloma Genomics Initiative dataset. Genomic identification of significant targets in cancer (GISTIC) was used (Beroukhim et al., 2007) to identify regions of aberrant copy number that were over-represented among samples. A relationship between poor prognosis and biallelic loss was found to be statistically significant (p = 0002) while samples with hemizygous loss showed no relationship (p = 0.57). Although the size of the current AA cohort is small, these results suggest that homozygous deletions at the p18 locus may be more common among African American MM patients with non-hyperdiploid tumors which may help to explain the disparity in AA patients with MM. Array CGH is currently being conducted on an additional 40 tumors from AA MM patients for a more robust analysis.
Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19(10 Suppl):B64.