Comparative analysis of the post-lumpectomy target volume versus the use of pre-lumpectomy tumor volume for early stage breast cancer: implications for the future.
Authors: Nichols EM , Mohiuddin M , Flannery T , Dhople AA , Yu C , Regine WF 
Published: December 2010

Abstract
Abstract #5134
Purpose: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is increasingly being utilized for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Planning target volume (PTV) generation with this approach is based on the post-lumpectomy cavity volume (post-LPC) and is often associated with treatment of large amounts of normal breast tissue which can result in patient ineligibility for external beam APBI (EB-APBI). In malignancies such as soft tissue sarcomas, neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to be associated with smaller volumes of tissue irradiated compared to adjuvant RT. However, neoadjuvant RT has not been attempted in the setting of APBI. We hypothesized that a PTV generation based on an expansion of the pre-lumpectomy (pre-LP) intact tumor volume would result in a significant reduction in the volume of irradiated normal breast tissue compared to the current approach of using the post-LPC. We further hypothesize that the use of EB-APBI utilizing the pre-LP tumor will result in greater patient eligibility for APBI.&#x2028; Materials and Methods: 40 patients with 41 early stage breast cancers previously treated with breast conserving lumpectomy and RT were analyzed. Pre-operative imaging and pathology reports were used to determine a pre-LP tumor volume. A sphere, the diameter of which was the largest determined radiographic dimension, representing the pre-LP tumor volume was placed in the center of the previously contoured and treated lumpectomy cavity. PTVs were developed for the pre-LP tumor volume and the post-LPC volume as per the NSABP-B39 protocol guidelines. The pre-LP and post-LPC PTV volumes were compared. Suitability for APBI was analyzed using criteria set forth by NSABP-B39 guidelines.&#x2028; Results: For all patients, the pre-LP PTV was smaller than the post-LPC PTV. The median volume for the pre and post-LPC PTVs were 93 cc (range 24 – 570 cc) and 250 cc (range 45 – 879 cc), respectively. Paired t-test analysis demonstrated the pre-LP PTV to be significantly smaller than the post-LPC PTV, p &lt; 0.001. The average difference between pre-LP and post-LPC PTVs represented 173 cc (range 21 – 482 cc) or 18% (range 3 - 42%) of the whole breast volume. Based on our analysis, only 3 of 41 cases were ineligible for EB-APBI when using the pre-LP tumor volume, (2 based on pathologic criteria and 1 based on dose/volume constraints) while 13 of 41 cases were ineligible when using the post-LPC PTV (2 based on pathologic criteria and 11 based on dose/volume constraints).&#x2028; Conclusion: PTVs based on the pre-LP tumor expansion are likely to be associated with a significantly reduced amount of normal breast tissue irradiated compared to post-LPC PTVs potentially leading to improved breast cosmesis, decreased dose to critical structures and decreased toxicities. Additionally, eligibility for EB-APBI would potentially increase if administered in the pre-lumpectomy setting. The findings from this study support future investigation as to the implications and feasibility of neoadjuvant APBI.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 5134.