bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Rehabilitation promotes functional movement in atypical populations
Authors: Morris Meg , Matyas Thomas , Iansek Robert , Cunnington Ross 
Published: February 2010

AbstractThe suggestion that movement disorders exhibited by people with central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction should be considered normal and therefore not rehabilitated is rejected from three standpoints: (1) the CNS does not always select the best movement patterns for optimal long term outcome, (2) there is literature demonstrating that rehabilitation enhances motor function and independence, and (3) there exists a capacity for motor recovery and motor skill learning following brain damage.
Abnormal movements can be identified in “atypical” populations
Authors: Phillips J. G. , Bradshaw J. L. , Slavin M. J. , Pantelis C. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractLatash & Anson's discussion of movements of “atypical” populations is potentially topical but unhelpful. Abnormal movements can be distinguished from any compensatory adjustments in Parkinson's, Huntington's, and Alzheimer's diseases and schizophrenia. To suggest otherwise may do “atypical” populations and their caregivers a disservice. It would be more meaningful to discuss the relative modularity and separability of cognitive and motor processes.
Is motor pathology associated with setting new CNS priorities or with increased difficulty in overcoming or suppressing preexisting CNS priorities?
Authors: Swinnen Stephan P. , Verschueren Sabine M. P. , Dounskaia Natalia 
Published: February 2010

AbstractWhereas Latash & Anson (L&A) have underscored the rearrangement or setting of new priorities, our primary focus is on preexisting central nervous system (CNS) priorities that become even more prevalent and intrusive under pathological conditions. The adaptations observed in the disordered motor system can often be understood against the backdrop of these primary CNS constraints. Even though this perspective has not been specifically addressed in the target article, we consider it complementary and not necessarily in opposition to L&A's primary thesis.
Towards functional movement: Implications for research and therapy
Authors: Worringham C. J. , Kerr G. K. , O'Brien C. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractResearchers and clinicians have different goals and constraints in trying to understand and treat movement disorders. Research on primary and secondary aspects of disorders may lead to effective treatment aimed at restoring functional movements even if the primary disorder cannot be cured. Similarly, movement patterns may be maladaptive and hence need therapeutic intervention to restore functional movement skills.
Imagination and imitation: Input, acid test, or alchemy?
Authors: Heyes C. M. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractImmediate imitation is likely to be a major, direct input to Barresi & Moore's level 2 competence, but deferred imitation is unlikely to play a key role in the transition to level 3, because (1) the attribution of first person knowledge is neither a necessary cause nor an obvious consequence of deferred imitation, and (2) deferred imitation does not correlate phylogenetically with capacities that more plausibly either yield or reflect a concept of intentional agency.
Understanding minds and selves
Authors: Hobson R. Peter 
Published: February 2010

AbstractBarresi & Moore provide a welcome focus on children's abilities to integrate first and third person information about intentional relations but they pay insufficient attention to the origins of children's understanding of the nature of subjective orientations vis-à-vis a shared world and the potential significance of such understanding as a source (rather than an outcome) of domain-general information-processing capacities.
Omitting the second person in social understanding
Authors: Reddy Vasudevi 
Published: February 2010

AbstractBarresi & Moore do not consider information about intentional relations available within emotional engagement with others and do not see that others are perceived in the second as well as the third person. Recognising second person information forces recognition of similarities and connections not otherwise available. A developmental framework built on the assumption of the complete separateness of self and other is inevitably flawed.
Understanding self and other
Authors: Barresi John , Moore Chris 
Published: February 2010

AbstractWe consider the various criticisms and requests for clarification made by the commentators of our framework for understanding intentional relations. Our response is organized according to the main themes in the target article: general theory, phylogeny, development, and autism. We also add some discussion of further issues, such as simulation and moral theory, that were not addressed in the target article.
Everyday memory and activity
Authors: Alterman Richard 
Published: February 2010

AbstractThe target article interprets current psychological research on everyday memory in terms of a correspondence metaphor. This metaphor is based on a reduction of everyday memory to autobiographical and eyewitness memory. This commentary focuses on everyday memory as it functions in activity. Viewed from this perspective, the joining of everyday memory to a correspondence metaphor is problematic. A more natural way to frame the processes of everyday memory is in terms of context, practice, and pragmatics.
The relation between reproductive and reconstructive processing of memory content
Authors: Bahrick Harry P. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractQuantitative losses of memory content imply replicative processing; correspondence losses imply reconstructive processing. Research should focus on the relationship between these processes by obtaining accuracy- and quantity-based indicators of memory within the same framework. This approach will also yield information about the effects of task and individual-difference variables on loss and distortion, as well as the time course of each process.
The correspondence metaphor: Prescriptive or descriptive?
Authors: Bruce Darryl 
Published: February 2010

AbstractKoriat & Goldsmith's abstract correspondence metaphor is unlikely to prove useful to memory science. It aims to motivate and inform the investigation of everyday memory, but that movement has prospered without it. The irrelevance of its competitor – the more concrete storehouse metaphor – as a guiding force in memory research presages a similar fate for the correspondence perspective.
Driving and dish-washing: Failure of the correspondence metaphor for memory
Authors: Karn Keith S. , Zelinsky Gregory J. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractKoriat & Goldsmith restrict their definition of memory to “being about some past event,” which causes them to ignore the most common use of memory: everyday visual-motor tasks. New techniques make it possible to study memory in the context of these natural tasks with which memory is so tightly coupled. Memory can be more fully understood in the context of these actions.
Remembering as doing
Authors: Neisser Ulric 
Published: February 2010

AbstractKoriat & Goldsmith are right in their claim that the “ecological” and “traditional” approaches to memory rely on different metaphors. But the underlying ecological metaphor is notcorrespondence(which in any case is not a metaphorical notion): it isaction. Remembering is a kind of doing; like most other forms of action it is purposive, personal, and particular.
Contexts and functions of retrieval
Authors: Winograd Eugene 
Published: February 2010

AbstractKoriat & Goldsmith provide an excellent analysis of the flexibility of retrieval processes and how they are situationally dependent. I agree with their emphasis on functional considerations and argue that the traditional laboratory experiment motivates the subject to be accurate. However, I disagree with their strong claim that the quantity–accuracy distinction implies an essential discontinuity between traditional and naturalistic approaches to the study of memory.
On an evolutionary model of sex differences in mathematics: Do the data support the theory?
Authors: Feingold Alan 
Published: February 2010

AbstractThe target article draws on evolutionary theory to formulate a biosocial model of sex differences in quantitative abilities. Unfortunately, the data do not support some of the crucial hypotheses. The male advantage in geometry is not appreciably greater than the male advantagi in algebra, and the greater male variability in mathematics cited by Gear is not cross-culturally invariant.
Arithmetic and old lace
Authors: Foss Jeffrey 
Published: February 2010

AbstractGeary's project faces the severe methodological difficulty of tracing the biological effects of gender on mathematical ability in a system that is massively open. Two methodological stratagems he uses are considered. The first is that pancultural sex differences are biological in nature, which is dubious in the domain of mathematics, since it is completely culture-bound. The second is that sociosexual differences are partly caused by biosexual differences, which renders his thesis unfalsifiable and empirically empty.
The logic of the sociobiological model Geary-style
Authors: Proudfoot Diane 
Published: February 2010

AbstractGeary's is the traditional view of the sexes. Yet each part of his argument – the move from sex differences in spatial ability and social preferences to a sex difference in mathematical ability, the claim that the former are biologically primary, and the sociobiological explanation of these differences – requires considerable further work. The notion of a biologically secondary ability is itself problematic.
Genetic influences on sex differences in outstanding mathematical reasoning ability
Authors: Zohar Ada H. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractSexual selection provides an adequate partial explanation for the difference in means between the distributions, but fails to explain the difference in variance, that is, the overrepresentation of both boys with outstanding mathematical reasoning ability (OMRA) and boys with mental retardation. Other genetic factors are probably at work. While spatial ability is correlated with OMRA, so are other cognitive abilities. OMRA is not reducible to spatial ability; hence selection for navigational skill is unlikely to be the only mechanism by which males have gained an advantage in OMRA.
Is the distribution of coherence a test of the model?
Authors: Bullock Theodore H. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractDoes the Wright & Liley model predict: (1) that subdural and hippocampal EEGs coherence tend to rise and fall in parallel for many frequencies, (2) that it is locally high or low within 10mm and falls steeply on average or, (3) that it is in constant flux, mostly rising and falling within 5–15 sec?
Neural system stability
Authors: Freeman Walter J. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractTwo hypotheses concerning nonlinear elements in complex systems are contrasted: that neurons, intrinsically unstable, are stabilized through embedding in networks and populations; and, conversely, that cortical neurons are intrinsically stable, but are destabilized through embedding in cortical populations and corticostriatal feedback systems. Tests are made by piecewise linearization of nonlinear dynamics at nonequilibriumoperating points, followed by linear stability analysis.
Dynamics of the brain — from the statistical properties of neural signals to the development of representations
Authors: Oliver Andrew 
Published: February 2010

AbstractThe unification of microscopic and macroscopic models of brain behaviour is of paramount importance and Wright & Liley's target article provides some important groundwork. In this commentary, I propose that a useful approach for the future is to incorporate a developmental perspective into such models. This may be an important constraint, providing a key to understanding the nature of macroscopic measures of brain function such as functional measures like ERP.
Consequences of basing ethical judgments on heuristics
Authors: Lindsay R. O. , Gorayska Barbara 
Published: February 2010

AbstractBaron assumes that ethical decision-making can be evaluated without specifying more general features of the cognitive system within which it occurs. It is suggested that ethical principles are heuristics employed during goal-oriented action planning. Heuristics are bound to generate suboptimal decisions in some cases. It is rational to replace a particular heuristic only when the cost of associated error exceeds the cost of constructing and installing a more successful alternative.
Which behavioral consequences matter? The importance of frame of reference in explaining addiction
Authors: Heyman Gene M. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractThe target article emphasizes the relationship between a matching law-based theory of addiction and the disease model of addiction. In contrast, this response emphasizes the relationship between the matching law theory and other behavioral approaches to addiction. The basic difference, I argue, is that the matching law specifies that choice is governed by local reinforcement rates. In contrast, economics says that overall reinforcement rate controls choice, and for other approaches there are other measures or no clear prediction at all. The response also differs from the target article in that there is more emphasis on the finding that stimulus conditions determine whether choice is under local or overall reinforcement rate control.
Speaking of language: Thoughts on associations
Authors: Graham Susan , Poulin-Dubois Diane 
Published: February 2010

AbstractMüller attempts to downplay cases of dissociation between language and cognition as evidence against the modularity of language. We review cases of associations between verbal and nonverbal abilities as further evidence against the notion of language as an autonomous subsystem. We also point out a discrepancy between his proposal of homologies between nonhuman primates' communication and human language and recent proposals on the evolution of language.
It's a far cry from speech to language
Authors: Rivera-Gaxiola Maritza , Karmiloff-Smith Annette 
Published: February 2010

AbstractWe agree with Müller's epigenetic view of evolution and ontogeny and applaud his multilevel perspective. With him, we stress the importance in ontogeny of progressive specialisation rather than prewired structures. However, we argue that he slips from “speech” to “language” and that, in seeking homologies, these two levels need to be kept separate in the analysis of evolution and ontogeny.
Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research
Authors: Epstein Samuel David , Flynn Suzanne , Martohardjono Gita 
Published: February 2010

AbstractTo what extent, if any, does Universal Grammar (UG) constrain second language (L2) acquisition? This is not only an empirical question, but one which is currently investigable. In this context, L2 acquisition is emerging as an important new domain of psycholinguistic research. Three logical possibilities have been articulated regarding the role of UG in L2 acquisition: The first is the “no access” hypothesis that claims that no aspect of UG is available to the L2 learner. The second is the “partial access” hypothesis that claims that only LI instantiated principles and LI instantiated parameter-values of UG are available to the learner. The third, called the “full access” hypothesis, asserts that UG in its entirety constrains L2 acquisition.In this paper we argue that there is no compelling evidence to support either of the first two hypotheses. Moreover, we provide evidence concerning functional categories in L2 acquisition consistent with the claim that UG is fully available to the L2 learner (see also Flynn 1987; Li 1993; Martohardjono 1992; Schwartz & Sprouse 1991; Thomas 1991; White 1989). In addition, we will attempt to clarify some of currently unclear theoretical issues that arise with respect to positing UG as an explanatory theory of L2 acquisition. We will also investigate in some detail certain crucial methodological questions involved in experimentally testing the role of UG in L2 acquisition and finally, we will present a set of experimental results of our own supporting the “Full Access” hypothesis.
Adult language acquisition and Universal Grammar
Authors: Freidin Robert 
Published: February 2010

AbstractThe current conception of the relation between UG and the grammar of a language rules out the no-access hypothesis, but does not distinguish between the full-access and partial-access hypotheses. The former raises the issue of why language acquisition in child and adult should be so different. The evidence presented in Epstein et al.'s target article seems inconclusive regarding a choice between hypotheses.
Universal Grammar and critical periods: A most amusing paradox
Authors: Lieberman Philip 
Published: February 2010

AbstractEpstein et al. take as given that, (1) a hypothetical Universal Grammar (UG) exists that allows children effortlessly to acquire their first language; they then argue (2) that critical or sensitive periods do not block the UG from second language acquisition. Therefore, why can't we all effortlessly “acquire” Tibetan in six months or so? Data concerning the neural bases of language are also noted.
On gradience and optionality in non-native grammars
Authors: Sorace Antonella 
Published: February 2010

AbstractEpstein et al.'s “full access to Universal Grammar” position is conceptually and empirically problematic. Its shortcomings are illustrated through a brief discussion of the following issues: (1) initial versus final states of grammatical knowledge in a second language, (2) knowledge of gradience of grainmaticality, (3) optionality and retention in non-native grammars, and (4) the empirical measurement of syntactic knowledge.
Appreciating the poverty of the stimulus in second language acquisition
Authors: Sprouse Rex A. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractThe most compelling evidence for Epstein et al.'s central thesis that adult second language acquisition is constrained by the innate cognitive structures that constrain native language acquisition would be evidence of poverty of the stimulus. Although there are studies that point to such evidence, Epstein et al.'s primary form of argumentation, targetlike performance by second-language acquiring adults, is much less convincing.
Universal Grammar and second language acquisition: The null hypothesis
Authors: Epstein Samuel David , Flynn Suzanne , Martohardjono Gita 
Published: February 2010

AbstractThe target article advanced the null, unified and widely misinterpreted generative hypothesis regarding second language (L2) acquisition. Postulating that UG (Universal Grammar) constrains L2 knowledge growth does not entail identical developmental trajectories for L2 and first language (LI) acquisition; nor does it preclude a role for the L1. In embracing this hypothesis, we maintain a distinction between competence and performance. Those who conflate the two repeat fundamental and by no means unprecedented misconstruals of the generative enterprise, and more specifically, of the empirical content of the null hypothesis regarding L2 linguistic knowledge growth. We hope to have identified certain common goals, the adoption of which might constitute a firm foundation for continued productive interdisciplinary development of contemporary theoretical and experimental L2 acquisition research.
In search of nonvisual motor images
Authors: Rossetti Yves , Rode Gilles 
Published: February 2010

AbstractJeannerod's target article and a number of commentators stressed the necessity of distinguishing between motor representation and perceptual images. A patient with a lesion of the central somatosensory pathways allowed us to test for this distinction. The outcome suggests that motor images may not be visual and that the “pragmatic” framework proposed by Jeannerod for vision can apply to other sensory modalities.
Motor representations: One or many?
Authors: Jeannerod M. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractTwo issues have been raised. The first concerns whether consciousness is attached to a given type of action. It is argued that purposive actions are represented before being executed and that motor representations can either remain implicit or become explicit according to the task. The second issue concerns whether or not mental imagery of action is independent from action. Recent evidence showing the commonality of neural mechanisms for motor imagery and action, respectively, goes against the idea of independent processes.
Hippocampus, delay neurons, and sensory heterogeneity
Authors: Colombo Michael , Gross Charles G. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractWe raise three issues concerning the Eichenbaum, Otto & Cohen (1994) model. (1) We argue against the strict division of labor that Eichenbaum et al. attribute to neocortical and limbic regions. (2) We raise the possibility that the anterior and posterior portions of the hippocampus may be important for different types of information processing. (3) We argue that, rather than reflecting relational processing, different neural responses to “match” and “nonmatch” trials may relate to different required spatial responses.
Sequential processing of “items” and “relations”
Authors: Mumby Dave G. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractEichenbaum et al. (1994a) hypothesized that perceptually distinct items and the relations among them are processed sequentially by the parahippocampal region and the hippocampal formation, respectively. Predictions based solely on their model's sequential-processing feature might prove easier to disconfirm than those based on its representational features. Two such predictions are discussed: (1) double dissociations should be impossible following hippocampal vs. parahippocampal lesions, and (2) hippocampal lesions should not exacerbate impairments that follow complete parahippocampal lesions.
The hippocampus seen in the context of declarative and procedural control
Authors: Toates Frederick 
Published: February 2010

AbstractVarious apparently incompatible theories of hippocampal function have been proposed but integration is now needed. It is argued that the involvement of the hippocampus is most clearly seen when the animal needs to extrapolate beyond current sensory information. Such control can involve both the initiation of behaviour in the absence of appropriate sensory input and the inhibition of behaviour that might otherwise be triggered by current sensory input.
Group selection and “the pious gene”
Authors: Barresi John 
Published: February 2010

AbstractIf selection at the group level is to be considered more than a mere possibility, it is important to find phenomena that are best explained at this level of selection. I argue that human religious phenomena provide evidence for the selection of a “pious gene” at the group level, which results in a human tendency to believe in a transcendental reality that encourages behavioral conformity to collective as opposed to individual interest.
What is selected in group selection?
Authors: Lamb Michael E. 
Published: February 2010

AbstractMisunderstandings often develop when scientists from different backgrounds use the same words (e.g., “selection”) when they mean different things by them. Theorists must therefore choose and define their terms carefully. In addition, proponents of “new” theories need to demonstrate empirically that theirs are more powerful than the existing theories they wish to supplant. Wilson & Sober have not yet done this.