Mechanism of 5‐hydroxytryptamine‐induced coronary vasodilatation assessed by direct detection of nitric oxide production in guinea‐pig isolated heart
Authors: Ellwood Amanda J. , Curtis Michael J. 
Published: July 2012

We assessed whether a submaximal concentration (1 μm) of 5‐hydroxytryptamine (5‐HT) releases nitric oxide (NO) from the coronary endothelium in guinea‐pig perfused heart (n = 5 or 6/group) by direct detection of NO in coronary effluent, and determined whether this accounts for the associated coronary dilatation. We also tested whether saponin is a selective and specific tool for examining the role of this mechanism in mediating agonist‐induced coronary dilatation.
Continuous 5 min perfusion with 5‐HT, or acetylcholine (ACh; 1 μm), substance P (1 nM) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 1 μm) increased coronary flow from baseline by 3.6 ± 0.2, 3.4 ± 0.2, 1.8 ± 0.1 and 4.1 ± 0.2 ml min−1 g−1, respectively (all P < 0.05). Coronary effluent NO content, detected by chemiluminescence, was correspondingly increased from baseline by 715 ± 85, 920 ± 136, 1019 ± 58 and 2333 ± 114 pmol min−1 g−1, respectively (all P < 0.05).
Continuous perfusion for 30 min with NG‐nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester (L‐NAME) 100 μm reduced basal coronary effluent NO content by 370 ± 32 pmol min−1 g−1 and coronary flow by 7.5 ± 0.5 ml min−1 g−1 (both P < 0.05). Saponin (three cycles of 2 min of 30 μg ml−1 saponin perfusion interrupted by 2 min control perfusion) reduced basal coronary NO content by a similar amount (307 ± 22 pmol min−1 g−1) but reduced basal coronary flow by only 0.6 ± 0.2 ml min−1 g−1 (P < 0.05 versus the effect of L‐NAME).
The increases in coronary flow in response to (5‐HT), ACh and substance P were reduced (all P < 0.05) by 100 μm L‐NAME to 1.2 ± 0.3, 1.2 ± 0.4 and 0.3 ± 0.3 ml min−1 g−1, respectively. However, the flow increase in response to SNP was not reduced; it was in fact increased slightly to 4.8 ± 0.4 ml min−1 g−1 (P < 0.05).
Similarly, after treatment with saponin, the increases in coronary flow in response to 5‐HT, ACh and substance P were reduced to 2.1 ± 0.3, 1.3 ± 0.3 and 0.4 ± 0.2 ml min−1 g−1, respectively (all P < 0.05). Again, the response to SNP was increased slightly to 4.6 ± 0.5 ml min−1 g−1 (P < 0.05).
L‐NAME and saponin also inhibited 5‐HT, ACh and substance P‐induced NO release (P < 0.05), without affecting equivalent responses to SNP.
For substance P, the change in coronary flow (ΔCF) correlated with log10 ΔNO in the presence and absence of saponin and L‐NAME; ΔCF = 1.2(log ΔNO)‐1.9; r = 0.92; P < 0.05. For 5‐HT the relationship was ΔCF = 2.2(log ΔNO‐2.7; r = 0.79; P < 0.05, indicating that 5‐HT causes a disproportionately greater increase in coronary flow per release of NO. This was taken to indicate that 5‐HT relaxes coronary vasculature in part by releasing NO, but in part by additional mechanisms. ACh resembled 5‐HT in this respect.
Saponin had no effect on cardiac systolic or diastolic contractile function assessed by the construction of Starling curves with an isochoric intraventricular balloon.
In conclusion, despite its minimal effect on basal coronary flow, saponin is an effective tool for revealing endothelium‐dependent actions of coronary vasodilator substances and has selectivity in that it does not impair endothelium‐independent vasodilatation or cardiac contractile function. 5‐HT dilates guinea‐pig coronary arteries largely by the release of NO from the coronary endothelium.