Stratigraphic and structural compartmentalization of dryland fluvial reservoirs: Triassic Heron Cluster, Central North Sea
Authors: McKie T. , Jolley S. J. , Kristensen M. B. 
Published: November 2010

Abstract

This paper describes the nature and relative significance of stratigraphic and structural compartmentalization in dryland fluvial reservoirs using data drawn from the Heron Cluster (Heron, Egret and Skua) oil fields in the UK Central North Sea. The Triassic Skagerrak Formation reservoir in these fields was deposited in a variety of dryland terminal fluvial settings, ranging from relatively arid terminal splay and playa to more vegetated, channel-confined systems with associated floodplain and palustrine facies. Laterally extensive floodbasin shales punctuate this terminal fluvial architecture. Static and dynamic data indicate that these fields are compartmentalized: geochemical data indicate significant fluid variations both between wells and vertically within individual wells; material balance calculations suggest production from restricted connected volumes, locally from a subset of the range of oils present; and re-perforation across significant shale boundaries access undepleted reservoir with different fluid compositions. Lateral variations
could
be ascribed to prominent structuration within these fields, but in general these high net:gross reservoirs do not have a viable fault seal mechanism. Early (syn-halokinetic) grounding of Triassic ‘pods’ between salt swells during salt withdrawal has resulted in zones of intense faulting along the zone of contact of the pod and the underlying basement, and also on the flanks of pods as the margins collapsed under further salt withdrawal. This deformation occurred under relatively shallow burial depths and is largely expressed by disaggregation zones and phyllosilicate fault rocks. Fault property averaging algorithms (e.g. shale gouge ratio), indicate that the sands should communicate across the juxtapositions, implying that the fluids and pressures should equilibrate between reservoir sands. However, the stratigraphic differences across major shales in both fluid geochemistry and pressure caused by draw-down are preserved despite the presence of these faults. The preservation of stratigraphic compartments indicates that for these faults the deformation mechanism was probably dominated by clay smear, in which the shale-prone sequence was smeared down the fault planes without losing its coherence. This style of stratigraphic compartmentalization occurs across several shale-prone intervals that are correlatable across the region. In some cases these mark the boundaries to major changes in fluvial depositional character, provenance and floodplain drainage, suggesting an extrinsic control that led to shale packages defining consistent barriers in all the fields. Other shale barriers do not show major changes in depositional character and, although correlatable, appear to be the product of semi-regional advance and retreat of the fluvial systems, possibly combined with nodal avulsion. In contrast to reservoirs deposited by large exorheic rivers, the terminal nature of these dryland fluvial systems appears to have resulted in the repeated interfingering of fluvial and floodbasin facies over a scale of many tens of kilometres. As a result such terminal fluvial reservoirs are prone to stratigraphic compartmentalization. However, thinner shales are prone to breaching by fluvial erosion and as a result not all correlatable shale events form barriers and only a subset will compartmentalize. Mitigation against this compartmentalization requires a development strategy where well trajectory and perforation maximizes stratigraphic exposure.