Abstract PO5-11-11: Risk Assessment, Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema – Objective Measurements and Patient Reported Outcomes
Authors: Desai Anshumi , Eldar Orli-Friedman , Halfteck Gili , Moller Mecker , Kesmodel Susan , Franceschi Dido , Goel Neha , Crystal Jessica , Huang Laura , Hu Jennifer , Tulay Koru-Sengal , Zhao Wei , Narvaez-Rojas Alexis , Avisar Eli 
Published: May 2024

Abstract
Background Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) affects the quality of life, but there is no consensus regarding early detection and monitoring. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are important in assessing cancer survivor outcomes, and different questionnaires have been developed. LYMPHA (Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach) and S-LYMPHA (Simplified LYMPHA) have reduced BCRL rates. This study aims to identify the most reliable PRO in a South Florida multi-ethnic population and to study correlations between PROs and objective measurements in the first 6 months after axillary surgery. Methods Patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiation were included. L-Dex score (Bioimpedance Spectroscopy) and three validated questionnaires (LyQLI, Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory; LyQOL, Lymphedema Quality of Life and FACT-B4+ Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lymphedema) were recorded at baseline, and 6 months post-surgery to assess the agreement between patient-reported symptoms and BCRL. L-Dex score outside the normal range or a 10 unit increase above baseline was considered lymphedema. Additional variables such as demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities were recorded. Results Out of 40 recruited patients, 39 were analyzed (excluding one deceased patient). Patient and treatment characteristics are described in Table 1. Patients were divided into three cohorts (Figure 1) for analysis: ALND with no axillary radiation (7.69%; n=33), Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) with axillary radiation (7.69 %; n=3), and ALND with axillary radiation (85%; n=3). In the first cohort, LYMPHA or S-LYMPHA were associated with lower rates of lymphedema (19% vs, 50%) (p=0.116). No patients in the second or third cohort developed lymphedema. There were 4 out of 20 (20%) patients with lymphedema with scores above the median for FACT B4+ (p= 0.480) and a lower score (higher quality of life) correlated with lower L-Dex (p=0.76). The higher value in the physical domain of LyQLI showed higher L-Dex (p=0.826). There was a significant inter-domain correlation in LyQLI and LyQOL (p= &lt; 0.001). Conclusion These results validate the use of PROs alongside objective measurements to assess BCRL. In addition, LYMPHA and S-LYMPHA significantly reduce lymphedema rates. Larger numbers will be necessary to reach statistical significance and to identify the best PRO.
Figure 1

Division of patient population into three cohorts
Table 1 Demographic and Treatment Summary
Citation Format: Anshumi Desai, Orli-Friedman Eldar, Gili Halfteck, Mecker Moller, Susan Kesmodel, Dido Franceschi, Neha Goel, Jessica Crystal, Laura Huang, Jennifer Hu, Koru-Sengal Tulay, Wei Zhao, Alexis Narvaez-Rojas, Eli Avisar. Risk Assessment, Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema – Objective Measurements and Patient Reported Outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-11-11.