Abstract PO2-13-07: SMARCA2 compensation of SMARCA4 loss mediates adaptive resistance to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer: paired transcriptomic analysis of pre- and post-treatment samples from NeoSTOP and NeoPACT
Authors: Stecklein Shane , Yoder Rachel , Staley Joshua , Schmitt Zachary , O'Dea Anne , Nye Lauren , Satelli Deepti , Crane Gregory , Madan Rashna , O'Neil Maura , Godwin Andrew , Pathak Harsh , Khan Qamar , O'Shaughnessy Joyce , Sharma Priyanka 
Published: May 2024

Abstract
Objectives/Rationale: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) are at high risk for disease recurrence and death. While multiple prognostic biomarkers associated with response to NAST have been identified, adaptive resistance mechanisms to NAST remain poorly understood. Identifying and characterizing adaptive resistance mechanisms can illuminate novel therapeutic approaches and improve outcomes for TNBC patients with RD.
Methods: Total RNA was isolated from pre-treatment and paired surgical specimens (for patients with RD) from TNBC patients treated with chemotherapy on the NeoSTOP (NCT02413320) or chemoimmunotherapy on the NeoPACT (NCT03639948) neoadjuvant trials and was subjected to RNA exome sequencing. Comparative marker selection analysis was performed by computing the two-sided paired samples t-test for each gene followed by pre-ranked gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) amongst 23,797 annotated gene sets. Gene sets with false-discovery rate (FDR) corrected P values &lt; 0.001 were determined to be significant.
Results: Pre-treatment sequencing data were available for N=200 patients and the overall pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 56.5%. Paired pre- and post-treatment sequencing data were available for N=58 patients with RD (N=27 from NeoSTOP and N=31 from NeoPACT). 165/23,797 gene sets were significantly enriched in post-treatment compared to pre-treatment samples. SHEN_SMARCA2_TARGETS_UP (M29) was among the top five significantly enriched gene set and was selected for further analysis based on the known role of the SWI/SNF complex in cell survival and the availability of clinically viable SMARCA2 degraders. Pre-treatment SMARCA4 expression was associated with pCR, with lower median expression noted in patients with RD compared to patients who achieved pCR (P=0.04). Pre-treatment SMARCA2 expression was not associated with pCR (P=0.48). On paired sample analysis there was pronounced downregulation of SMARCA4 in post-treatment compared to pre-treatment samples in all patients (mean Z=-1.46, P&lt; 0.0001), in patients treated with chemotherapy (mean Z=-1.65, P&lt; 0.0001), and in patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy (mean Z=-1.28, P&lt; 0.0001). Although there was no difference in SMARCA2 expression between paired pre- and post-treatment samples (mean Z=0.03, P=0.83), there was enrichment of SMARCA2 target expression on GSEA analysis (NES=2.63, FDR q&lt; 0.00001) indicating that SMARCA2 activity is compensating for therapy-induced SMARCA4 loss.
Conclusions: We identified 165 gene sets that were significantly enriched in paired post-treatment compared to pre-treatment TNBC samples. Altered activity of the SMARCA2 subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex was identified as one of the top hits. SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 are mutually exclusive subunits of SWI/SNF, and inactivation of both SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 is synthetic lethal. We observed an association of lower pre-treatment SMARCA4 expression with resistance to NAST and pronounced therapy-induced downregulation of SMARCA4 and induction of SMARCA2 target genes in post-treatment compared to pre-treatment samples, suggesting that SMARCA2 compensates for adaptive SMARCA4 loss. SMARCA2 degraders are in early-phase clinical trials and are known to induce synthetic lethality in SMARCA4-deficient cells. Our results identify adaptive loss of SMARCA4 and synthetic lethal targeting of compensatory SMARCA2 as an attractive therapeutic target in TNBC patients with RD after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy.
Citation Format: Shane Stecklein, Rachel Yoder, Joshua Staley, Zachary Schmitt, Anne O'Dea, Lauren Nye, Deepti Satelli, Gregory Crane, Rashna Madan, Maura O'Neil, Andrew Godwin, Harsh Pathak, Qamar Khan, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Priyanka Sharma. SMARCA2 compensation of SMARCA4 loss mediates adaptive resistance to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer: paired transcriptomic analysis of pre- and post-treatment samples from NeoSTOP and NeoPACT [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-13-07.