Ischemic Conditioning Improves the Microvascular Hyperemic Response to Passive Limb Movement in Young Adults
Authors: Whitaker-Hilbig Alicen , Nguyen Jennifer N. , Hyngstrom Allison , Durand Matthew J. 
Published: May 2024

Background: Passive limb movement (PLM) of the lower extremity is a simple and clinically relevant approach to measure peripheral microvascular health. PLM causes an acute increase in hyperemic leg blood flow (LBF) without an increase in skeletal muscle metabolism, and the hyperemic response is ~80% nitric oxide-mediated. A known therapeutic stimulus to increase large conduit artery vascular health is ischemic conditioning (IC). Whether a single session of IC can improve the hyperemic response to PLM remains unknown. Objective: To quantify the microvascular response to PLM after a single session of IC in young adults. Hypothesis: The hyperemic response to PLM, measured as a change in peak femoral artery blood flow, will be greater following IC vs. sham-IC. Methods: This was a prospective, cross-over, blinded clinical trial (NCT05935670). Young adults aged 18-30 years who were free of cardiovascular disease were recruited, and study participants completed two study visits. Participants were seated in a Biodex dynamometer and superficial femoral artery resting blood flow and diameter were measured in the dominant leg using ultrasonography. The dynamometer then passively moved the knee 90 degrees at a frequency of 1 Hz for a single PLM while blood flow was continuously measured. The ΔLBF was calculated as the absolute (ml/min) and relative (% change) difference in LBF from rest to peak. Participants were then randomized to receive either IC or sham-IC, and the vascular assessor was blinded to the condition. For IC, the cuff was placed around the proximal dominant thigh and repetitively inflated to 225 mmHg for 5 min then deflated for 5 min, for a total of 5 cycles. For sham-IC, the thigh cuff was inflated to only 25 mmHg. Fifteen minutes after IC or sham-IC the hyperemic response to PLM was re-assessed. The pre-/post- change in the PLM hyperemic response was calculated as the difference from pre- vs. post-IC or sham-IC. Statistical analysis included one-sided paired t-tests. Results: Seven individuals (3 female, age 26 ± 4 years old) completed the study. Compared to pre-IC, the relative peak hyperemic response to PLM was augmented post-IC (%ΔLBF = 89 ± 42% pre- vs. 136 ± 49% post-IC, p=0.001). Conversely, there was no change in the relative peak hyperemic response in the sham-IC condition (%ΔLBF = 108 ± 61% pre- vs. 108 ± 77% post-sham-IC, p=0.50). The pre-/post- change score of absolute peak hyperemic response to PLM was also higher after IC vs. sham-IC (change in ΔLBF = 50 ± 78 IC ml/min vs. -44 ± 127 ml/min sham-IC, p = 0.03). Conclusion: These results show an improvement in the peripheral microvascular response to PLM following IC. Future studies should examine the mechanistic pathways responsible for an improved PLM response as well as the potential benefits of IC on microvascular health in clinical populations with underlying peripheral microvascular dysfunction. AAW was supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (T32HL13464) and Cardiovascular Center’s A.O. Smith Fellowship Scholars Program. Research was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development R01-HD099340 (ASH and MJD) and R01-HD112258 (MJD and ASH). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.