Association between left atrial wall thickness and residual potential after first-pass pulmonary vein isolation using very high-power short-duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation
Authors: Lee S R , Lee K Y , Choi E K , Oh S 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Background
In this study, we evaluated efficacy, efficiency, and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) applying vHPSD ablation strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and explored the association between left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) and the residual potential after first-pass PVI.

Methods
Between April 2, 2023 and October 6, 2023, drug refractory symptomatic AF patients who underwent AF ablation using vHPSD ablation strategy with QDOT MICRO catheter were prospectively enrolled. All patients took cardiac computed tomography (CT) a day before procedure. Using CT image, LAWT map was created. PV segments were categorized into prespecified 14 segments, and LAWT of each segment, segments with residual potential (RP) after first-pass PVI and early reconnection after 20-minute waiting after PVI were evaluated. Total procedure time, ablation time for PVI, and occurrence of procedure-related complication were collected.

Results
A total of 40 patients were included (mean age 64 years, 45% of persistent AF). Additional ablation other than PV was performed in 48% of patients, total procedure time was 77 minutes, and total PVI time was 9.9 minutes. With vHPSD PVI, all PVs first pass isolation rate was 60%; in terms of per PV, RSPV first-pass isolation was 88%, followed by LSPV and LIPV 85%, RIPV showed lowest first-pass isolation rate, 75% (Figure A). Most common RP sites was right carina, followed by left carina (Figure A). Compared to historical comparator, vHPSD PVI showed shorter procedure time, shorter ablation time for PVI, with numerically lower but statistically comparable first-pass PVI rate (Figure B). In total 560 PV segments in 40 patients, RSPV anterior, left carina, and right carina showed higher prevalence to be thick PV segments (over 60% of patients), followed by RPSV posterior, LSPV posterior, and RIPV anterior (over 40% of patients). Looking into ablation parameter detail, mean contact force was 10g, mean temperature was 47°C, and mean impedance drop was 8.4Ω. Compared to segments without RP, segments with RP showed thicker mean left atrial wall thickness grades, lower minimum contact force, higher maximum temperature, and lower minimum impedance drop. According to the left atrial wall thickness, thick PV segments showed higher prevalence of RP after first-pass PVI with vHPSD ablation. In segments with LAWT grade 3 or more, the RP rate was 9.1%. This thickness means thicker than 1.5 to 2.0 mm of thickness (Figure C). In 10% of patients (n=4) had audible or tactile steam-pops, visible char was confirmed in 5% of patients (n=2). There were no clinical complications.

Conclusion
PVI using vHPSD achieved shorter procedure time, shorter ablation time for PVI, and comparable first-pass PVI rate compared to historical comparator using ablation-index guided conventional power ablation. Thick segments had higher chance to have residual potential after first-pass PVI with vHPSD.