IVF and risk of Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a population-based nested case–control study
Authors: Weng Shiue-Shan , Chien Li-Yin 
Published: June 2024

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION
Is the mode of conception (natural, subfertility and non-IVF, and IVF) associated with the risk of Type 1 diabetes mellitus among offspring?

SUMMARY ANSWER
The risk of Type 1 diabetes in offspring does not differ among natural, subfertility and non-IVF, and IVF conceptions.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Evidence has shown that children born through IVF have an increased risk of impaired metabolic function.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
A population-based, nested case–control study was carried out, including 769 children with and 3110 children without Type 1 diabetes mellitus within the prospective cohort of 2 228 073 eligible parent-child triads between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2017.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Using registry data from Taiwan, the mode of conception was divided into three categories: natural conception, subfertility, and non-IVF (indicating infertility diagnosis but no IVF-facilitated conception), and IVF conception. The diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes mellitus was determined according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th Revision, Clinical Modification. Each case was matched to four controls randomly selected after matching for child age and sex, residential township, and calendar date of Type 1 diabetes mellitus occurrence.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Based on 14.3 million person-years of follow-up (median, 10 years), the incidence rates of Type 1 diabetes were 5.33, 5.61, and 4.74 per 100 000 person-years for natural, subfertility and non-IVF, and IVF conceptions, respectively. Compared with natural conception, no significant differences in the risk of Type 1 diabetes were observed for subfertility and non-IVF conception (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.85–1.27]) and IVF conception (adjusted odds ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.50–2.03]). In addition, there were no significant differences in the risk of Type 1 diabetes according to infertility source (male/female/both) and embryo type (fresh/frozen).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
Although the population-level data from Taiwanese registries was used, a limited number of exposed cases was included. We showed risk of Type 1 diabetes was not associated with infertility source or embryo type; however, caution with interpretation is required owing to the limited number of exposed events after the stratification. The exclusion criterion regarding parents’ history of diabetes mellitus was only applicable after 1997, and this might have caused residual confounding.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
It has been reported that children born to parents who conceived through IVF had worse metabolic profiles than those who conceived naturally. Considering the findings of the present and previous studies, poor metabolic profiles may not be sufficient to develop Type 1 diabetes mellitus during childhood.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
This study was supported by grants from Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital (No. 109GB006-1). The funders had no role in considering the study design or in the collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication. The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
N/A.