#1353 Apathy and fatigue in patients treated with haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis
Authors: Trbojevic-Stankovic Jasna , Andrić Branislav , Nikic Petar , Milošević Saša , Savić Slaviša 
Published: May 2024

Abstract

Background and Aims
Apathy is a distinct syndrome manifesting with a loss of interest in social or emotional situations, lack of sense of purpose, low energy levels and detachment from life and personal events. Previous studies showed that apathy is associated with vascular impairment and consequent cognitive dysfunction, reduced quality of life and increased hospitalization, institutionalization, healthcare costs and death. So far there has been little research on the prevalence of apathy among dialysis patients although this population could be considered at risk for this condition due to increasing age, and disease and treatment burden. Fatigue is also common in dialyzed patients and impacts daily living, impairs the quality of life, increases the risk of cardiovascular events and negatively influences survival.
This study aimed to explore the link between apathy and fatigue among hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

Method
We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study which included 75 HD (57.3% male, median age 64 years) and 62 PD patients (48.4% male, median age 61 years) from two dialysis centres. Apathy status was assessed by the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) by Starkstein. Fatigue was evaluated with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) scale. AES score of 14 and higher denotes the presence of apathy, while a FACIT score of less than 30 indicates severe fatigue. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained by a focused questionnaire and from electronic medical records. Data were analyzed with T-test, Hi-square, ANOVA and Pearson correlation as applicable.

Results
HD patients were significantly longer on dialysis than PD patients (p=0.046). Apathy was more frequent among PD patients compared to the HD group (64.5% vs 48%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.053). Severe fatigue was more frequent in the HD group (33.8% vs 27.4%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.424).
Elderly patients had a higher prevalence of apathy in both HD (70.3% vs 29.7%, p&lt;0.001) and PD groups (84.2% vs 16.3%, p = 0.008), and a significantly higher prevalence of severe fatigue in the HD group (68% vs 32%, p = 0.017). Among HD patients higher education level was significantly associated with higher FACIT and lower apathy scores (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001 respectively). HD patients taking psychotropic medication had significantly lower FACIT (27.2±13.5 vs 35.0 ± 11.9, p = 0.03). Also, the presence of apathy was significantly associated with lower hemoglobin levels (101.7±9.7 vs 110.3±11.2, p = 0.001), red blood cells count (3.2±0.2 vs 3.5±0.6, p = 0.004), lower serum creatinine (900.0±149.1 vs 1001.5±266.4, p = 0.047) and lower Kt/V (1.35±0.22 vs 1.49±0.24, p = 0.008) in the HD group, while PD patients with severe fatigue had significantly higher creatinine levels (796.7±176.9 vs 646.4±200.0, p = 0.009). Gender, dialysis vintage, primary renal disease, and comorbidities were not significantly associated with either apathy or fatigue in either group of patients.
Apathy and fatigue were significantly correlated in both the HD (p = 0.04) and the PD (p = 0.001) groups.

Conclusion
Apathy is a highly prevalent and often overlooked condition among dialyzed patients regardless of dialysis modality. Longitudinal studies should explore whether apathy is a causative factor for fatigue in these populations.