Abstract PO1-05-12: Pooled clinical trial data analyses comparing the biology of HER2-low vs HER2-0 breast cancer in patients with metastatic breast cancer following treatment with standard single agent chemotherapy
Authors: Lamont Elizabeth , Stein Emily , Tarantino Paolo , Tolaney Sara , Ahlberg Corinne , Chinnathambu Krishna , Qi Jiezhi , Tummagunta Kala , Bilan Jackie , Davi Ruthanna , Ensign Lisa 
Published: May 2024

Abstract
Background: Prior analyses of observational data suggest that for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), tumor biology does not vary by HER2-low vs. HER2-0 expression given similar overall survival (OS) times after accounting for patients’ clinicopathologic features including hormone receptor (HR) status. We sought to evaluate potential differential biology by HER2-low status by (1) studying data pertaining to patients treated in historic clinical trials (i.e., data collected to measure associations between protocol defined treatments and outcomes) and (2) evaluating the endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) in addition to OS following treatment with standard single agent chemotherapy for MBC. Methods: Pooling anonymized clinical trial data from studies within the Medidata Enterprise Data Store, we identified 142 women with HER2-negative MBC who received treatment with an NCCN recommended single agent chemotherapy in the context of a clinical trial. Using patient-level immunohistochemistry (IHC) results, we categorized patients as either HER2-low (IHC 1+/2+ and not amplified by in situ hybridization) or HER2-0 (IHC 0). We compared patients’ baseline demographic and clinicopathologic features according to HER2-low vs HER2-0 status. We used Cox proportional-hazard models stratified by HR status to estimate OS and PFS according to HER2-low vs HER2-0 classification while adjusting for patients' baseline demographic and clinicopathologic attributes. Results: Patients with HER2-low disease represented 20% (28/142) of the HER2-negative cohort. Twenty-five percent (7/28) of HER2-low patients had tumors that expressed hormone receptors compared with 17% (19/114) of HER2-0 patients (p=0.31). In this cohort, the maximum follow up time was 38.4 months. For HER2-low patients vs HER2-0 patients, the median OS was 10.7 vs. 12.7 months (p=0.37), and the median PFS was 3.5 vs. 2.9 months (log rank test, p=0.53) respectively. In Cox proportional-hazard models that adjusted for patient demographic and clinicopathologic features and were stratified by HR status, patients with HER2-low tumors had an 16% elevated (non-significant) hazard of death compared with patients with HER2-0 tumors (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.69-1.95) and a 22% reduced (non-significant) hazard of progression or death (HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.45-1.35). Conclusions: Analyses of pooled historic clinical trial data pertaining to women with HER2-negative MBC who were treated with single agent chemotherapy revealed no meaningful clinical differences in either OS or PFS endpoints according to HER2-negative subtypes (i.e., HER2-low vs. HER2-0) after accounting for patient demographic and clinicopathologic features. These results support prior findings from observational research suggesting that there are no biological differences associated with HER2-negative subtypes.
Table. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Models for OS and PFS Stratified by Hormone Receptor Status, (N=134) Variable OS PFS HR* 95% CI HR* 95% CI Age (decade) 0.84 0.70-1.01 0.86 0.72-1.01 Race White 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) Black 1.75 0.84-3.63 1.57 0.66-3.73 Asian 0.93 0.47-1.80 1.33 0.71-2.51 Other 1.69 0.45-6.38 2.10 0.62-7.15 Ethnicity Non-Hispanic or Latino 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) Hispanic or Latino 2.10 0.95-4.64 1.02 0.44-2.35 HER2 Characterization HER2-0 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) HER2-1+/2+ 1.16 0.69-1.95 0.78 0.45-1.35 Prior Lines of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Disease 0 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) 1 0.82 0.46-1.46 1.13 0.65-1.95 2 0.69 0.35-1.36 1.00 0.52-1.93 3 0.59 0.10-3.42 2.18 0.45-10.50 ECOG Performance Status 0 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) 1 1.65 1.07-2.54 1.57 1.02-2.43 Legend: OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; HR=hazard ratio; HER2=human epidermal group factor receptor 2; ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. *Analyses adjusted for clinical trial membership (coefficients not reported)
Citation Format: Elizabeth Lamont, Emily Stein, Paolo Tarantino, Sara Tolaney, Corinne Ahlberg, Krishna Chinnathambu, Jiezhi Qi, Kala Tummagunta, Jackie Bilan, Ruthanna Davi, Lisa Ensign. Pooled clinical trial data analyses comparing the biology of HER2-low vs HER2-0 breast cancer in patients with metastatic breast cancer following treatment with standard single agent chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-05-12.