Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signs of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
Authors: Beier Dagmar , Korsbæk Johanne Juhl , Bsteh Gabriel , Macher Stefan , Marik Wolfgang , Pemp Berthold , Yuan Hsiangkuo , Nisar Areeba , Høgedal Lisbeth , Molander Laleh Dehghani , Hagen Snorre Malm , Beier Christoph Patrick , Kristensen Simon Bang , Jensen Rigmor Højland 
Published: July 2024

ImportanceThe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria currently used to diagnose idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) are based on expert opinion and have limited accuracy. Additional neuroimaging signs have been proposed and used with contradictory results; thus, prospective evidence is needed to improve diagnostic accuracy.ObjectiveTo provide evidence-based, accurate MRI signs for IIH diagnosis.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2018 to May 2021 with 3 validation cohorts at 2 Danish headache centers and with 3 independent international cohorts. Consecutive patients with suspected IIH were enrolled. Eligibility required the clinical suspicion of IIH, age 18 years or older, and written informed consent. The validation cohorts comprised patients with confirmed IIH from Austria and the US, and patients without IIH from the US. Data analysis was performed from December 2021 to August 2023.ExposureStandardized diagnostic workup was performed to classify cases according to current criteria, and blinded evaluation of cerebral radiological diagnostics and papilledema was performed.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were MRI signs associated with IIH as assessed by univariate analyses. An MRI score estimating papilledema was calculated using machine learning. Internal validation of associations with lumbar puncture opening pressure and outcome and external validation of accuracy were performed in 3 cohorts.ResultsOf 192 eligible patients (185 women [96.4%]; median [IQR] age, 28.0 [23.0-35.0] years), 110 were classified as having IIH, 4 as having probable IIH, and 1 as having suspected IIH without papilledema; 77 did not have IIH and served as controls, with corresponding age, sex, and weight. Papilledema at diagnosis was associated with perioptic subarachnoid space distension (56 patients [68.3%] vs 21 patients [41.2%]), posterior globe flattening (53 patients [66.3%] vs 10 patients [21.3%]), optic nerve disc protrusion (35 patients [30.4%] vs 2 patients [2.3%]), and transverse sinus venous stenosis (75 patients [79.8%] vs 29 patients [46.8%]). The papilledema-estimating MRI score showed optimal balance between sensitivity (49%) and specificity (87%) when 2 of the 3 latter signs were present and was associated with the lumbar puncture opening pressure and ophthalmological outcome. The score showed strong diagnostic accuracy in the external validation cohorts (587 patients; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.86) and outperformed the current (2013) diagnostic MRI criteria.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this cohort study of patients with IIH and controls suggest that an evidence-based MRI score including posterior globe flattening, optic nerve disc protrusion, and transverse sinus stenosis can estimate the presence of papilledema more accurately than the current diagnostic criteria.