The action‐potential duration and contractile response of the intact heart related to the preceding interval and the preceding beat in the dog and cat
Authors: Elzinga Gijs , Lab Max J. , Noble Mark I. M. , Papadoyannis Demetrios E. , Pidgeon John , Seed Anthony , Wohlfart Bjorn 
Published: December 2014

1. Simultaneous measurements were made in anaesthetized dogs of monophasic action potentials from the right ventricle and of the maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure (dPlv/dtmax). Atrio‐ventricular dissociation was induced and the heart paced via right ventricular electrodes.2. A control period of steady pacing was followed by a test stimulus after a variable interval called the ‘test‐pulse interval’. The duration of the action potential of the test beat (measured at 70% repolarization) increased with test‐pulse interval and reached an approximately steady value at intervals of 1·0‐1·5 sec. This constitutes the ‘electrical restitution curve’.3. An increase in the frequency of stimulation prior to the introduction of the test pulses caused a downward displacement of the electrical restitution curve.4. Stimulation at 2 Hz and paired pulse stimulation at 1 Hz (same number of stimuli per min) were introduced prior to the test pulses and produced very similar electrical restitution curves.5. For a constant frequency of stimulation in the control period, adrenaline produced downward displacement of the restitution curve.6. It is concluded that there is no obvious relationship between the restitution of the action potential duration and of the contractile response. We suggest therefore that electrical and mechanical restitution occur through separate processes, the former through time‐dependent recovery in membrane conductances and the latter through time‐dependent increase in availability of intracellular calcium for release.7. Contractions were introduced with a test‐pulse interval shorter than the optimum, and were followed by a second test pulse fixed at the optimum interval of 0·8‐1·0 sec. The second test beats were potentiated (post‐extrasystolic potentiation). In isolated ejecting cat hearts, there was an optimum interval for the first test pulse to produce the greatest potentiation of the second test beat. This interval was 0·2‐0·3 sec, and was shortened by an increase in frequency of stimulation prior to the first test beat.8. The interval preceding the first test pulse was then varied within a range (0·8‐2·0 sec) which did not produce potentiation. These first test pulses were sometimes preceded by one extrasystole. The timing of this extrasystole was altered to vary the post‐extrastolic potentiation of the first test pulse.9. Multiple regression analysis, carried out between dPlv/dtmax of the second test pulse (DP2, the dependent variable) and the action potential duration (AP1) and dPlv/dtmax (DP1) of the first test pulse (independent variables) yielded correlation coefficients between 0·88 and 0·99. Each determination of the coefficient included data from beats with and without post‐extrasystolic potentiation.10. It is postulated that the coefficient relating DP2 to DP1 in the multiple regression analysis (mean value 0·75) is an index of the proportion of calcium stored during relaxation which is released again on the next beat.11. When the decay of post‐extrasystolic potentiation was examined in consecutive beats at the optimum interval, the action potential durations of these beats were found to be nearly constant. A plot of dPlv/dtmax of each beat against dPlv/dtmax of the previous beat yielded a curvilinear relationship which was less steep than that relating DP2 to DP1 in the two test pulse analysis; this was attributed to inconstancy of calcium ion entry during the action potential.