Cellular sialoglycans are differentially required for endosomal and cell-surface entry of SARS-CoV-2
Authors: Siwak Kimberley C. , LeBlanc Emmanuelle V. , Scott Heidi M. , Kim Youjin , Pellizzari-Delano Isabella , Ball Alice M. , Temperton Nigel J. , Capicciotti Chantelle J. , Colpitts Che C. 
Published: June 2024

AbstractCell entry of severe acute respiratory coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other CoVs can occur via two distinct routes. Following receptor binding by the spike glycoprotein, membrane fusion can be triggered by spike cleavage either at the cell surface in a transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2)-dependent manner or within endosomes in a cathepsin-dependent manner. Cellular sialoglycans have been proposed to aid in CoV attachment and entry, although their functional contributions to each entry pathway are unknown. In this study, we used genetic and enzymatic approaches to deplete sialic acid from cell surfaces and compared the requirement for sialoglycans during endosomal and cell-surface CoV entry, primarily using lentiviral particles pseudotyped with the spike proteins of different sarbecoviruses. We show that entry of SARS-CoV-1, WIV1-CoV and WIV16-CoV, like the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant, depends on endosomal cathepsins and requires cellular sialoglycans for entry. Ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and the delta variant can use either pathway for entry, but only require sialic acid for endosomal entry in cells lacking TMPRSS2. Binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to cells did not require sialic acid, nor was sialic acid required for SARS-CoV-2 entry in TMRPSS2-expressing cells. These findings suggest that cellular sialoglycans are not strictly required for SARS-CoV-2 attachment, receptor binding or fusion, but rather promote endocytic entry of SARS-CoV-2 and related sarbecoviruses. In contrast, the requirement for sialic acid during entry of MERS-CoV pseudoparticles and authentic HCoV-OC43 was not affected by TMPRSS2 expression, consistent with a described role for sialic acid in merbecovirus and embecovirus cell attachment. Overall, these findings clarify the role of sialoglycans in SARS-CoV-2 entry and suggest that cellular sialoglycans mediate endosomal, but not cell-surface, SARS-CoV-2 entry. Thus, it may be important to consider both cell entry pathways when developing sarbecovirus entry inhibitors targeting virus-sialoglycan interactions.Author summaryThe COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has resulted in over 676 million infections and 6.8 million deaths so far, demonstrating the threat posed by emerging CoVs. In humans, SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses cause respiratory tract infections, such as the common cold, as well as more severe disease in some individuals. To prepare for future outbreaks, conserved steps in the CoV replication could be considered for antiviral prophylactic or therapeutic approaches. One such process is CoV cell entry, which occurs via two main routes: At the cell surface or within endosomes. Cellular receptors, proteases and complex sugars, known as glycans, mediate CoV entry steps. In this study, we compared the role of a specific glycan subset, sialoglycans, in endosomal and cell surface CoV entry. We show that sialoglycans are required for entry of various CoVs that are mainly dependent on the endosomal route, but in the case of SARS-CoV-2, sialoglycans were not required when the cell-surface entry route was available. Our findings contribute to understanding the mechanisms of CoV entry, which could inform development of pan-CoV antivirals that target CoV entry steps.