Abstract PD01-01: Overcoming endocrine therapy resistance related to PTEN loss by strategic combinations with mTOR, AKT, or MEK inhibitors
Authors: Fu X , Kumar V , Shea M , Biswal NC , Nanda S , Chayanam S , Mitchell T , Hergenroeder G , Meerbrey KL , Joshi A , Westbrook TF , Mills GB , Creighton CJ , Hilsenbeck SG , Osborne CK , Schiff R 
Published: August 2014

Abstract
Background: Hyperactive PI3K signaling is associated with a more aggressive subtype of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC) and with endocrine resistance. Loss or downregulation of PI3K's inhibitor PTEN is more common in basal and luminal B vs. luminal A BC. However, the role of PTEN in modulating response to various endocrine therapies is unclear. Here we investigated the effects of PTEN knockdown (KD) on endocrine sensitivity and the potential of multiple kinase inhibitors to restore and improve responses.
Methods: Nude mice bearing ER+ BC xenograft tumors of MCF7 cells stably expressing a doxycycline (Dox)-inducible PTEN-shRNA were randomized to four endocrine treatment groups [continued estrogen (E2) supplementation, or E2-deprivation (ED) alone or in combination with tamoxifen (Tam) or fulvestrant (Ful)]; all -/+ Dox. The effects of single or combined kinase inhibitors on these endocrine treatments -/+ Dox were studied in vitro using inhibitors (i) to mTOR (AZD2014, 0.2 μM), AKT (AZD5363, 1 μM), or MEK (Selumetinib/ARRY-142886, 1 μM). Cell growth, apoptosis, and ER and progesterone receptor (PR) signaling were analyzed using cell cytometry, qRT/PCR, and Western blotting. Synergism tests were used to examine the growth effects of the most promising combinatorial therapy with multiple kinase inhibitors in different endocrine settings.
Results: In wild-type (WT) PTEN xenograft tumors, endocrine therapies were very effective, inducing frequent tumor regression. In PTEN KD tumors endocrine therapies were less effective — PTEN KD delayed tumor regression in all endocrine regimens and accelerated tumor progression in the Tam treated group. Furthermore, at day 250, only 1/8 and 0/7 tumors had developed resistance in the ED and the Ful (−Dox) groups, respectively, while with PTEN KD (+Dox), 7/15 and 5/15 tumors developed resistance to ED and to Ful. In vitro PTEN KD also induced resistance to all endocrine therapies. mRNA and/or protein levels of ER and PR were suppressed by PTEN KD and restored by mTORi and AKTi. In cells with WT PTEN, mTORi was highly effective with or without endocrine therapy. However, AKTi and MEKi were more effective in combination with endocrine therapy. All three inhibitors were less effective upon PTEN KD. The mTORi plus AKTi combination resulted in a potent synergistic inhibition in PTEN KD cells in the presence of E2 or with ED. In contrast, in the presence of Tam, AKTi plus MEKi, independent of PTEN status, was the most effective combination at the doses chosen. Finally, these inhibitors and combinations were more effective in the presence of Ful than ED or Tam in WT PTEN cells. AKTi combined with Ful was still highly effective even in PTEN KD cells, but mTORi and MEKi were less effective.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that PTEN loss renders endocrine therapy less effective in in vitro and in vivo experimental models. Single AKT/MEK kinase inhibitors are more potent in the presence of endocrine therapy. In PTEN KD cells, the activity of all three kinase inhibitors is largely diminished, except for AKTi in the presence of fulvestrant. Kinase inhibitor combinations are generally more effective, but the optimal combinations vary by PTEN status and type of endocrine therapy.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD01-01.