P-532 Preimplantation genetic testing versus morphology as selection criteria for single embryo transfer in women aged 35-42: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial
Authors: Beebeejaun Y , Bakalova D , Copeland T , Mania A , Sarris I , Capalbo A , Sunkara S 
Published: July 2024

Abstract

Study question
To assess the feasibility of running a large randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the benefit of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) for embryo selection.

Summary answer
Running a PGT-A RCT is feasible. Considerations include participant recruitment, seven-day biopsy-embryologist availability and logistical complexities.

What is known already
Critics question the effectiveness of PGT-A leading to concerns about false positives and negatives, unnecessary embryo discarding and clinical effectiveness. Past studies have been criticised for only performing biopsy on top quality embryos, their criteria for randomization and the age of the population being assessed. Given these uncertainties there is a need for a rigorous RCT evaluating the role of PGT-A using current methodologies and biopsy techniques in women most affected by aneuploidy. Our pilot study is the first study where all embryos generated will undergo biopsy and ranked in terms in implantation potential prior to transfer.

Study design, size, duration
In this prospective, concealed allocation two-arm parallel RCT, our goal was to randomise 100 women with ≥3 good quality embryos on day 3 post egg collection into two groups: embryos screened using next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based PGT-A or selection-based on morphology alone. PGT-A patients underwent a trophectoderm biopsy on day 5/6/7 following egg collection. Biopsied embryos were frozen and subsequently transferred. Euploid and embryos described as being low mosaic (&lt;30% abnormal cells) were prioritised for transfer.

Participants/materials, setting, methods
Women aged between 35–42 years undergoing IVF±ICSI were included, with those undergoing PGT for inherited genetic disorders, gamete donation cycles, untreated hydrosalpinges or untreated uterine abnormalities excluded. Primary objective during the pilot phase was to assess the ability to recruit, randomise, adherence to the study protocol and plan for a full study. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transferred, clinical pregnancy rate per couple randomised, miscarriage rate and time to pregnancy.

Main results and the role of chance
Out of 247 eligible women,100 were randomised, and 94 received the assigned treatment. The recruitment rate was 70.18%(173/247, 95%CI 61.65%-78.70%). An average of 6 participants were randomised each month. All randomised participants completed the follow-up. Our main recruitment challenges included 19% of eligible patients choosing to have PGT-A privately and 6% withdrawing their consent choosing to have a fresh transfer. Lack of biopsy-embryologist also meant patients whose potential biopsy would have been on a weekend had to be excluded in the first 4 months of our recruitment process. Baseline characteristics including age, BMI and cause of infertility were comparable in both arms and a total of 56 euploid, 53 aneuploid and 3 low mosaic embryos were identified. There was no statistically difference in CPR (23/50 vs 21/50, RR 1.09 95%CI:0.83-1.15, p-value&gt;0.23) and miscarriage rate (3/50 vs 2/50, RR 1.5 95%CI:0.84-1.75, p-value: 0.15) per single embryo transfer or per woman randomised (23/46 vs 21/48, RR 1.14 95%CI 0.78-1.27, p-value:0.24 and 3/46 vs 2/48, RR 0.72 95%CI 0.58-1.17 p-value: 0.17) in either arm of the study. We cannot yet confirm the clinical benefit of PGT-A owing to the insufficient sample size in this pilot study. No low mosaic embryos were transferred.

Limitations, reasons for caution
The study was conducted in a single centre. If future definitive trials are conducted in multiple centres, the criteria for recruitment, randomisation, intervention, and follow-up still need to be unified. Many women aged above 40 failed to reach randomization due to challenges in producing three good-quality embryos.

Wider implications of the findings
The pilot study found that the eligibility rate is adequate however researchers should consider reviewing the conditions for randomisation in main study such as reducing the number of good embryos required to two. In addition, stratified randomization should be used in order to better balance female age within each group.

Trial registration number
NCT05009745