Efficacy, safety, tolerability and treatment durability of microneedling plus topical tranexamic acid in combination with topical modified Kligman lightening formula for melasma: A four‐arm assessor and analyst blinded randomized controlled clinical trial
Authors: Aghdam Saba Baybordi , Mohammad Arash Pour , Hosseini‐Baharanchi Fatemeh Sadat , Atefi Najmolsadat , Roohaninasab Masoumeh , Kahjoogh Hossein Ahmadi , Yazdanian Nafise , Goodarzi Azadeh 
Published: July 2024

AbstractBackgroundThe challenging management of melasma highlights the inadequacies of conventional therapies and their high risk of recurrence. Integrating microneedling for device‐assisted drug delivery with tranexamic acid (TA), recognized for its melanin synthesis inhibition, presents a novel approach that warrants further investigation to fully assess its potential in enhancing melasma treatment efficacy.MethodsFifty moderate to severe melasma patients participated in this randomized outcome‐assessor‐blinded controlled trial. Patients were randomly allocated into two main groups. Group A received a modified Kligman formula on one hemi‐face on alternate nights for 2 months (A1) and three sessions of microneedling with 10% topical TA on the other hemi‐face at 1‐month intervals (A2). Group B used the same modified Kligman formula on both sides of the face, with one side additionally receiving three sessions of microneedling with 4% TA (B1) and the opposite side with 10% TA (B2). Primary outcomes were % Modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) and % visual analogue scale (VAS) change during 6 month follow‐up. Adverse events including post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) and treatment tolerability were recorded.ResultsCompared to baseline, the mean mMASI reduction immediately after the final session was higher in A1, B1, and B2 (56.84%, 50.88%, and 55.87%, respectively) than in A2, which saw only a 13.16% reduction. Efficacy notably declined after the cessation of treatment across all groups.While the efficacy within groups A1, B1, and B2 was comparable, microneedling with 4% or 10% TA combined with the topical modified Kligman formula proved more potent in patients at a lower risk of PIH. Overall, 22% of patients reported PIH, particularly in the A2 group (28% of hemi‐faces), with its occurrence significantly associated with treatment during warmer seasons and in darker skin phototypes. Other adverse events were not observed in any patient.Patient satisfaction was highest in groups B1 and B2, where approximately 72% reported ‘excellent’ satisfaction. The lowest durability rate (16%) was observed in group A2, while the highest (72%) was seen in group B2, comparable with groups A1 and B1. Treatment tolerability was reported 100% in all groups.ConclusionIt was found that the modified Kligman formula outperformed microneedling‐TA alone. However, with optimal patient selection, particularly targeting those at lower risk for PIH with lighter skin phototypes and scheduling treatments during less‐sunny seasons, combining microneedling with 4% or 10% TA and the modified Kligman formula significantly enhanced efficacy and satisfaction rates compared to conventional topical treatment.