Characterization of Degradation Mechanisms of Alternative Electrolytes Solutions in Fast Charging Li-Ion Batteries
Authors: Fenner Emily , Allan-Cole Elizabeth , Garman Rachel , Toney Michael F 
Published: August 2024

While the idea that fast charging batteries could be utilized in electric vehicles is enticing, current fast charging batteries face significant challenges that must be mitigated before this application is realized. Fast charging batteries currently suffer from capacity loss and degradation over time which not only affects battery life but poses a safety hazard. The current electrolyte, 1.2 M LiPF6 in 3:7 wt.% EC/EMC (Gen2), contains the salt LiPF6 that when exposed to moisture can form dangerous hydrofluoric acid and contains a carbonate-based solvent that when exposed to oxygen can ignite. In addition, batteries experience degradation over many cycles of fast charging which results in capacity fade and poor battery performance. However, previous studies have shown the potential for other electrolyte systems to mitigate these problems, specifically by using highly concentrated electrolytes1. These studies claim that using these electrolytes results in the formation of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) that passivates Li ions better than the Gen2 electrolyte. The SEI is a layer that forms on the anode within the battery and serves as a protective layer that allows for Li intercalation into graphite and can therefore protect against degradation. By using different electrolytes, a different SEI is formed, and different degradation mechanisms are observed. In this way, the SEI can be tuned to improve Li passivation and ionic conductivity by changing the electrolyte’s composition and concentration2. This research focuses on such alternative electrolyte systems and aims to characterize the different degradation mechanisms corresponding to each electrolyte. Favorable performance has been observed using 1.2 M LiFSI in 3:7 wt.% EC/EMC as an electrolyte. We are studying LiFSI in acetonitrile (AN) at higher concentrations than traditional Gen2 to quantify the SEI. We expect AN to form an anion derived SEI, a composition of which results in improved passivation of Li ions1. In this study, we characterize degradation of alternative electrolyte systems through x-ray diffraction (XRD), x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Through these methods we can observe and quantify both crystalline, amorphous degradation products due to loss of Li inventory and loss of active material. XPS allows quantification of compositional changes in the SEI layer at the surface of the electrode. The SEM provides qualitative information on degradation such as visualizing lithium plating and dendrite formation. We implement quantitative XRD to measure the crystalline phases of the graphite anode, showing the degree of lithium intercalation and further quantifying degradation such as Li plating. Putting the results of these three characterization techniques together in tandem with electrochemical cycling data paints a picture of the degradation that happens on the anode of a fast-charging lithium-ion battery with respect to electrolyte composition.
[1] Yamada, Y., Wang, J., Ko, S., Watanabe, E., & Yamada, A. (2019). Advances and issues in developing salt-
concentrated battery electrolytes. Nature Energy.

[2] Logan, E. R., & Dahn, J. R. (2020). Electrolyte Design for Fast-Charging Li-ion Batteries. Trends in

Chemistry.