bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Environmental Governance and Regulation of the Oil Industry in Ghana: A Multi-Stakeholder Capacity Building Needs Assessment
Authors: Buchman Andrew , Slocum Dean , Boakye-agyei Kwame 
Published: September 2012

Abstract
Ghana is blessed with a wealth of new-found oil and gas resources. Discovery of the giant Jubilee field has given Ghana's leaders a sense of great opportunity and an equally great responsibility to avoid falling subject to the "oil curse". To help manage this balance, in 2010 the World Bank and the Norwegian government extended $58 million dollars in financing to help Ghana build systems to responsibly govern the development of its oil and gas resources. However, in putting this aid to good use Ghana must first understand and build consensus across various agencies and other stakeholders regarding its own needs for capacity building.
In 2011 Ghana's Ministry of Environment and Kosmos Energy undertook a "Needs Assessment of Capacity Building for Environmental Governance and Regulation of the Oil and Gas Industry" in an effort to establish this basis for progress. The study included interviews and workshops with dozens of stakeholders, and integration of the findings and recommendations of studies by government agencies, finance organizations, NGOs and other organizations regarding environmental governance in Ghana. The study identified ten high level need categories and specified 57 actions needed to make progress on strengthening the governance and regulatory systems to better manage future oil and gas activities. The Ministry intends to use the Assessment and associated Capacity Building plan as a needs-based foundation for building Ghana's capacity to better govern the environmental and social concerns associated with its oil boom.
Noise Reduction Interventions in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry
Authors: Nistov Aud , Klovning Reidulf , Lemstad Frank , Risberg Jan , Ognedal Tønnes A. , Haver Petter A. , Skogesal Aslaug J. 
Published: September 2012

Abstract
Noise exposure is still an important challenge to a safe and healthy work environment, both offshore and onshore. Studies over the last 10 years show that the noise exposure (expressed as the "average noise indicator") remains mainly unchanged with no significant reduction in the past decennium. Furthermore, several reports indicate that workers in the petroleum industry are exposed to high noise levels and the risk of developing noise-related hearing loss can't be neglected. Noise induced hearing loss is the most frequent reported work-related illnesses / injury reported to the Norwegian Petroleum Safety Authorities (PSA). Although the industry has taken a number of measures and established action plans for noise mitigation in offshore facilities, the potential for further noise-reduction is substantial.
However, to be able to implement adequate risk reducing measures, monitoring the above parameters (the average noise indicator and noise induced hearing damages) is not sufficient. We suggest further focus on low-noise design and modification of installations and facilities, development of low-noise technology, implementation of noise exposure in cost-benefit analysis, and dissemination of knowledge related to noise induced hearing loss.
This paper presents a study designed to develop such best practices of interventions aimed to reduce noise induced injuries in the petroleum industry.
One key area is the use of handheld tools used for operations like rust removal, sand blasting, grinding etc. Other key areas are noise from process plants, noise related to off-shore helicopter transport and noise exposure during subsea operations. Individual susceptibility to noise induced injuries is addressed as well as noise protection (barrier control) and use of personal protective equipment.
The study is performed in cooperation between the Norwegian Oil Industry Association (on behalf of the operators on the Norwegian continental shelf), the Federation of Norwegian Industries (NI) as well as the major unions in the Norwegian petroleum industry organised as a tri-partite project.
Addressing Cardiovascular Disease – A Global Employer's Approach to Non Communicable Diseases
Authors: Davis-Street Janis , Manlapaz Girlie , Shannon Amelia , Fagade Olubukunola A. 
Published: September 2012

Abstract

Non-Communicable Diseases – The Global Emergency
"Cancer, diabetes, and heart diseases are no longer the diseases of the wealthy. Today, they hamper the people and the economies of the poorest populations even more than infectious diseases. This represents a public health emergency in slow motion." UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon
Non-communicable diseases cause 60% of all deaths globally, 80% of which are in low- and middle-income countries and are a major cause of poverty, a barrier to economic development, and a neglected global emergency1. These diseases, and their associated risks, negatively impact productivity, medical costs and safety. In September 2011, the United Nations General Assembly convened a high-level meeting on non-communicable diseases - cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer and chronic lung diseases. Chevron is tackling non-communicable diseases, specifically cardiovascular disease and diabetes, by modeling workforce programs after our successful communicable disease initiatives. This integration of our focus in global public health to include the non-communicable diseases is consistent with Chevron's holistic approach to health.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a major global public health issue – According to the World Health Organization (WHO), CVDs are the number one cause of death globally2. The WHO predicts that by 2030, almost 24 million people will die from CVDs, mainly from heart disease and stroke. Low- and middle-income countries are disproportionally affected with deaths occurring almost equally in men and women. Taken in combination with an aging workforce, these statistics are alarming and make strategic sense for Chevron to address CVDs and their preventable and treatable risk factors.
Available Technologies to Prevent Cell Phone Use while Driving
Authors: Catten Corey 
Published: September 2012

Abstract
In this paper, I describe the available technologies to monitor and/or prevent employees from using their cell phones while driving. I present pros and cons of the categories of solutions that innovative companies have recently brought to market to solve this problem. And I present real-world results from pilot programs along with driver and HSE manager feedback and reactions.
This information applies to HSE professionals working to improve in-vehicle safety and distracted driving.
There are three categories of solutions to monitor and/or prevent cell phone use while driving. The first category is Investigation in which the company compares the cell phone records to the driving records after-the-fact. The second category is Prevention wherein an application is installed on the employee's phone to disable the call and text features when the phone senses fast motion or something else indicating the employee is driving. I have counted more than 10 companies started in the past 2 years based with a primary business model in the Prevention category. The third category is Detection involving a receiving antenna placed inside the vehicle and tuned to cellular frequencies. Each category of solution has advantages and disadvantages. For example, the Prevention category has the advantage that the driver has no choice (literally cannot make a call) but it can only work on smartphones issued by the company; and not on regular cell phones.
Next I will present ways drivers sought to defeat the monitor system and if they were successful during real-world trials. And finally, the paper will show any measured safety improvement with using the various methods.
According to Bloomberg, global smartphone sales have reached 250,000,000 units per quarter as of Q3 2011 and the trend continues upward. With about 5 billion cellular subscribers (70% of the world population) the chances are good your employed drivers have a cell phone on their person while driving a company vehicle. The paper informs HSE professionals about the available solutions for preventing these cellular phone and smartphones from distracting drivers and causing injuries.
Workplace Risks Related to Mental Illness and Distractibility: Real Solutions for Hidden Hazards
Authors: Riley John Dillon 
Published: September 2012

Abstract
The World Health Organization has reported that mental illness is a leading cause of Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) worldwide. One in four people will develop some kind of mental illness at some point in their lives. Today depression alone ranks 2nd as the cause of DALYs in the age category 15 – 44 years for both sexes (working populations in most countries). Fewer than 25 % of those afflicted have access to effective treatment worldwide and in more than half the countries of the world there is one psychiatrist available for every 200,000 people. By 2030, depression will be the second highest cause of disease burden in middle income countries and the third highest in low income countries. (Victoria Riemer (October 19, 2011). Mental Health Atlas 2011 in Media Center WHO. Retrieved June 15, 2012, fromwww.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2010/mental_disabilities_20100916/en/index.html
At the World Economic Forum convened in September 2011, comparisons were provided across Non-Communicable Diseases to provide a picture of the impact of the global economic health burden. Mental health costs are the largest single source; larger than cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, cancer, or diabetes. Mental illness alone will account for more than half of the projected total economic burden from NCDs over the next two decades and 35% of the global lost output. The global cost of mental illness in 2010 was approximately 2.5 T. with a projected increase to 6 T. by 2030. Considering that those with mental illness are at high risk for developing cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, and diabetes, and vice versa, the true costs of mental illness must be even higher. (Bloom, D.T; Caliero, ET; et.al. (Sept, 2011) The Global Economic Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases in A Report by the World Economic Forum and the Harvard School of Public Health, Retrieved, June 15, 2012.)
These mental health realities directly impact the ability of businesses to operate competitively and -- where hazardous operations are daily considerations -- safely. What further complicates responding to the business impact of this health problem is the lack of available research on incidents, near hits attributable to distractability caused by mental/relational problems. The evidence that workers arrive at work with mental illness or distractible frame of mind related to family members or loved ones afflicted with mental health problems is obscure. These issues by definition remain hidden and unidentified and therefore are elusive to normal research that identifies the impact on the workplace of other disease burden.
Management Systems for Social Performance: Current status and trends
Authors: IPIECA Social Responsibility Working Group _ 
Published: September 2012

Abstract
Community involvement in oil and gas activities has significantly increased in the past decade as a result of regulatory requirements around consultation and social impact assessment, global policy initiatives such as those led by the IFC and the UN Special Representative for Business and Human Rights, and advocacy from civil society. Gaining community acceptance is on the critical path for many projects across the industry. Concerned citizens can and do stop oil and gas activities that they view as impacting their way of life. Stakeholder resistance can lead to cost overruns and schedule delays that directly affect the bottom line. They can occasionally lead to litigation, withdrawal or refusal of permits, risks to the safety of the workforce and community members, and inability to operate a facility.
Many companies have external policy commitments around the social dimensions of sustainability, such as community relations, interaction with indigenous groups, local contracting, social benefits and human rights. These commitments are often supported by a series of internal requirements, systems and processes that support the delivery of effective social responsibility in practice. In some cases, integration of social responsibility is a simple matter of adding additional elements to existing management systems, and in other cases, separate systems may be put in place. These efforts are often supported by changes to organisational structure, and skilling up of staff.
IPIECA is developing guidance to its member companies on how to integrate social responsibility into their management systems in a number of areas. Relevant elements of these management systems include policies and standards, impact assessment and management, stakeholder engagement and grievance procedures, assurance and auditing, company risk assessment, competence development and reporting.
This paper outlines the current trends and challenges for integration and provides examples of good practice from across the industry.
Creating an Incident and Injury Free Workplace – An Australian View
Authors: Luxton Ric 
Published: September 2012

Abstract
Chevron prides itself on being an organisation that genuinely protects employees and the environment. It does this by adopting systems/procedures and encourages the hearts and minds of people to inherently choose to follow them.
Chevron's vision is: To be the global energy company most admired for its people, partnership and performance.To be recognised and admired as world class in process safety, personal safety and health, environment, reliability and efficiency.
In order to fulfill against the vision, Chevron is determined to achieve an incident and injury free workplace. Research tells us that 95% of all accidents result from human behaviour. Incident and Injury Free (IIF) a copyright product of JMJ Associates, was identified as a way of dealing with the human behaviours (subjective) of operations. The Australasian Business Unit (ABU) also employ's Chevron IIF Advisors in the field to support JMJ in the rollout of the Program.IIF Program in Australia
Lessons Learned from Shore Base Project in Thailand: Stakeholder Engagement and Public Participation
Authors: Malaiarisoon Sansana 
Published: September 2012

Abstract
Globally, Chevron's vision is to be the energy company most admired for its people, partnership and performance. It has continuously strived to be recognized and admired by industry and local communities for its world-class performance on safety, health, the environment, reliability and efficiency. To contribute to the achievement of this vision and promote responsible operations to protect people and the environment, Chevron performs a risk-based Environmental, Social and Health Impact Assessment (ESHIA) on all major capital projects to identify, analyze and develop measures that enhance benefits and avoid or mitigate potentially harmful effects of new projects. A goal of ESHIA is to establish and maintain dialogue with stakeholders throughout the lifetime of the project, solicit their views on potential benefits and impacts, and consider their ideas in the company's assessments and planning through a participatory approach. This is because Chevron is a firm believer that establishing and maintaining good relationships with communities and other key stakeholders are a significant factor in the foundation of the company's success in securing and maintaining both legal and social licenses to operate, and thus enhancing our presence as a ‘neighbor of choice’.
This paper explores the importance of stakeholder engagement to the development of a major capital project in Thailand – Chevron Thailand Shore Base Project – the correlation of the stakeholder engagement process in relation to the Chevron Project Development and Execution Process (CPDEP) and requirements under Thai National Environmental and Health Impact Assessment (EIA/HIA) regulations. Best practices and lessons learned for stakeholder engagement and participation are reviewed. Mechanisms for gaining stakeholders’ understanding and support of the project applicable to both large and small projects are also recommended.
Managing environmental risks and contributing to scientific advancement through external partnerships: Models for industry
Authors: Connick Sarah , Michael Jennifer Liebler 
Published: September 2012

Abstract
Biodiversity and science partnerships come in a variety of different models and can provide environmental, business and reputational benefits for industry. Using original analysis based on experiences from the field, this paper describes how oil and gas exploration and production activities present valuable opportunities to develop biodiversity and science partnerships with scientists in universities and associated with environmental NGOs. Leveraged appropriately, these partnerships can contribute to advancing basic science and promote environmental stewardship in the areas where we operate and beyond. Such partnerships can come in a variety of different models. While others have described specific successful partnerships at SPE, this paper focuses on partnership models and identifies benefits beyond those traditionally understood or valued by our industry. The paper includes examples of Chevron partnerships regarding marine habitat mapping in Australia, marine mammal acoustical monitoring in Angola, meteorological monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico, and deep ocean biodiversity surveys at several locations worldwide. The These partnerships have leveraged technical expertise, enhanced the credibility of data collected by the oil and gas industry, deepened scientific understanding, improved industry, governmental and other stakeholders’ decision making and contributed to industry and stakeholders’ environmental stewardship goals. The models presented in this paper can be leveraged more widely in the oil and gas industry as well as by governmental agencies, conservation scientists and researchers for the mutual benefit of the oil and gas industry and our external partners.
Integration of HES into the Management of a Major Capital Project
Authors: McHugh Steve , Manning Anne , Heagney Karen 
Published: September 2012

Abstract
During the Front End Engineering Design (FEED) stage of a project; scope, cost and schedule are locked down, the plans for construction are prepared and the licences, permits and access agreements obtained. Health, Environment and Safety (HES) deliverables include: assurance that the selected design options meet corporate and regulatory standards; input to ensure that the design is safe and environmentally responsible; the execution of baseline surveys and impact assessments to obtain required permits; the development of HES exhibits; and the review of tender documentation and contractor HES management plans. These activities, although often critical to project success are typically not tracked to completion alongside other project milestones.
This paper describes how during FEED, the Wheatstone Project built a specific HES Schedule from which were extracted a number of key milestones that were assigned a percentage contribution to the Final Investment Decision (FID). Any milestones interfacing with other delivery teams were integrated into the overall project plan with dependencies and links established. Progress for HES was then tracked alongside the progress of the rest of the project and a monthly dashboard produced as the prime communication vehicle for reporting performance.
This innovative approach put HES on the same footing as all the other project delivery teams and enabled HES conversations to take place in exactly the same manner as for engineering, commercial and technical disciplines. The integration of HES into project planning and progress measurement sharpened discipline around the delivery of milestones and the management attention afforded to them. The content of this paper and approach described can be used for future major capital projects throughout the oil and gas industry.
How a Multi-Sectoral Approach to Road Safety has Helped Raise Awareness and Reduce Road Traffic Crashes in Nigeria
Authors: Bello Muheez Olayinka , Opene Ossai A. 
Published: September 2012

Abstract
Increased motorization has increased the risk of road accidents.In Nigeria figures from the Federal Road Safety Commission show that accident rates increased from 4,673 in 2007 to 5,690 in 2009. Victims of avoidable road accidents cut across all strata of society. Given the socio-economic impact of Road Traffic Accidents, a collaborative approach to road safety offers the greatest opportunity for reducing road traffic crashes and raising road safety awareness in Nigeria. Government enforcement of Road Traffic Laws cannot totally eliminate the dangers of Road Crashes considering government's limited resources. A public partnership model offers the only viable and sustainable way of achieving a Safety conscious society. This paper shows how a partnership model for Road Safety is raising the bar in Safety advocacy in Nigeria.
Since 2006, we have focused attention on building partnerships in Nigeria to tackle the issues of road safety in our communities. In Collaboration with the Government and across different spheres of the Business Community, we have succeeded in bringing together the right consensus for promoting road safety.
Private-public partnership has proven successful in many areas of human endeavor. Our paper will share the challenges and successes we have faced as we built and launch the road safety coalition in Nigeria. We strongly believe that a collaborative approach to improving road safety can be successful and will make the desired impact.
During this session we will discuss: ■The benefit of private-public sector collaboration to improve road safety■Key learning regarding partnership■Successes with our targeted road safety action plan■Challenges of partnership and implementing road safety actions in Nigeria
You will gain: ■An understanding on how strategic interventions can berth multi-sectoral partnerships to enhance road safety awareness.■Knowledge of working partnership models for addressing road safety■Understanding of how to begin building collaborative relationships between the public and private sector■A good picture of how Governments and the Private Sector work together for Social Development in Nigeria.
Thank you
Muheez Olayinka Bello and Alex Opene