Abstract P2-15-02: Trastuzumab treatment of early breast cancer: Long-term results from a prospective observation study, including a large cohort of elderly patients
Authors: Dall P , Lenzen G , Göhler T , Feisel-Schwickeradi G , Koch T , Heilmann V , Schindler C , Wilke J , Tesch H , Selbach J , Eggert J , Hinke A 
Published: August 2014

Abstract
Purpose: Trastuzumab (T; Roche) is part of the standard treatment in patients (pts) of any age with early stage, HER2+ breast cancer, in addition to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and locoregional treatment. After its registration in Germany in 2006, this prospective observation study was started in order to assess the generalizability of the results from the randomized studies, specifically with respect to elderly age cohorts.
Methods: 4027 pts were enrolled between 2006 and 2012. 87 were non-eligible due to M1 and/or negative HER2 status. There were no restrictions for recruitment with respect to age or concomitant/sequential adjuvant medication. The long-term relapse/survival status of pts was retrieved by fax forms collected once a year. Safety assessment was limited to the treatment period. Data base cut-off was May 2013.
Results: Among the 3940 evaluable pts, there were 1013 elderly pts (EP) ≥ 65 years (y) of age (26%). This contrasts to the pivotal studies, e.g. with a proportion of only 6% beyond 65 y in the NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831 studies. The rate of EP steadily increased during the period from 2006 to 2009, remaining stable thereafter. More than half of the pts had pT≥2, with EP more often presenting with a larger tumor (56% vs. 48%,p&lt;.0001). 52% had a grade 3 tumor. Hormone receptor positivity was recorded in 63%. As to be expected, performance status was more impaired in elderly compared to younger pts (ECOG 0: 53 vs 65%,p&lt;.0001). 94% received CT, 78% as adjuvant, 14% as neoadjuvant treatment (in EP only 8%), while 2% received both modalities. In the vast majority (87%), T was administered sequentially to CT, with no differences among the age cohorts. The proportion without any adjuvant CT was higher in EP (8 vs. 5%). 56% of pts were treated with adjuvant endocrine medication, 78% with irradiation. T treatment was stopped prematurely in only 9% of pts, but more often in EP (11% vs 8%, p = .014).
After a follow-up period of up to a maximum of 8 y, 370 relapses were reported so far. The estimated recurrence-free survival is 94.7% (95% CI: 94-96%), 89.8% (89-91%), and 82.9% (81-85%) after 2, 3 and 5 y, respectively. Numeric results in EP are only slightly lower with 93.9 (92-96%), 89.3% (87-92%), and 81.6% (78-85%), not statistically significant (p = 0.18, HR = 1.17 [95% CI: 0.93 - 1.47]). Adverse effects with respect to cardiac function were reported in overall 153 pts (3.9%), with the majority of these cases of NCI grade 1 (39%) or 2 (38%). 23% of these events were of grade 3/4, but life-threatening in only 2 pts. Thus, the overall incidence of acute grade 3/4 cardiac function toxicity was 0.9%. In the EP subgroup the incidence across all NCI grades was only slightly increased (4.6%), but grade 3/4 cases were more common (1.6%).
Conclusion: Overall, the maturing follow-up data of this observational study confirm the beneficial results from the randomized studies. In addition, the data from more than thousand pts ≥ 65 y of age show that a similar anti-tumor efficiency can be achieved in elderly pts, and suggest that minor age-related differences detected with respect to adjuvant treatment duration, aggressiveness and toxicity do not impair the long-term clinical outcome.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-15-02.