bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A scientometric analysis of career anchor/orientation research from 1975 to 2023
Authors: Woldeamanuel Asegid Getachew 
Published: July 2024

AbstractCareer has traditionally been associated with its external dimension. However, the emergence of the concept of career anchor/orientation broadened its scope to include an internal component that encompasses the subjective desire, values and talents of individuals. The current scientometric review focused on analyzing career anchor/orientation research over the last five decades (1975–2023). The articles/documents used for analysis were searched and located from a purposely selected highly recognized databases. A total of 111 documents (articles, books, book chapters, conference proceedings) were selected for analysis. The result showed that the conceptualization of career anchor/orientation has remained stable with only some changes and emergence of few rival models. While the existing literature has provided valuable insights into the concept of career anchors, there are several gaps that need to be addressed. Future research should strive to expand the current understanding of career anchors by exploring additional career anchors, investigating their organizational implications, examining their interaction with other individual and contextual factors, and studying their manifestation in non-traditional work settings. The research in the area has shown a swinging trend with lots of ups and downs. Career anchor/orientation publications were spread over more than 24 countries. The US is ranked 1st with 28% of the total publication and is followed by the Asia continent and the UK. Africa, only represented by two countries (South Africa and Nigeria), is ranked fourth. Most of the empirical research have mainly focused on assessing the distribution of the dimensions of career anchor/orientation with few relating it with job settings and outcomes. It is recommended that career anchor/orientation scientometric analysis should be done by searching articles from more databases. More to this, as national contexts and cultural differences play a critical role in shaping career anchor/orientation of individuals it is suggested that more research needs to be done across a number of countries.
An open-label, multicenter, phase I study of ATG-022 in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (CLINCH).
Authors: Bishnoi Sarwan , Cao Dan , Mendis Shehara Ramyalini , Coward Jim , Zhao Jun , Xie Hui , Zheng Li 
Published: July 2024

3032 Background: Claudin 18.2 (CLDN 18.2) is a tumor associated antigen broadly expressed in gastric, pancreatic, and other solid tumors. ATG-022 is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC), consisting of a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to CLDN 18.2 with high affinity of sub-nM grade and a conjugated linker-payload vc-MMAE. ATG-022 has displayed promising tumor growth inhibition activity both in vitro and in vivo. Methods: CLINCH is a phase I, multi-center, open-label, dose-finding study (NCT05718895) of ATG-022 in patients with advanced solid tumours. The study design includes a dose escalation phase, enrolling subjects with advanced/metastatic solid tumors, regardless of CLDN 18.2 expression, and a dose expansion phase which will enroll select advanced/metastatic solid tumors with CLDN 18.2-positive expression at the defined maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended Phase 2 dose to further evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ATG-022. Other endpoints include pharmacokinetics (PK) and exploratory biomarkers of drug activity. In the dose escalation phase, ATG-022 is administered intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W) at the starting dose of 0.3 mg/kg, followed by 0.9, 1.8, 2.4, 3.0, and 3.6 mg/kg Q3W using a modified 3+3 dose-escalation design. Efficacy assessments are evaluated per RECIST1.1 criteria. Results: As of 9 Oct 2023, 10 patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors have been enrolled to receive ATG-022 at a dose from 0.3 to 2.4 mg/kg. Median age was 59 years. Baseline ECOG scores were 0 (0 pts) and 1 (10 pts); 8 pts had stage IV disease. Three pts had received more than 3 prior lines of systemic therapy. Eight pts (80%) had ≥ 1 TRAEs; 1 pt (10%) had ≥ 1 Serious TRAEs; 3 (30%) pts had grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The most common grade ≥ 3 TRAEs included nausea (30%), vomiting (30%) and decreased appetite (30%). No DLT was reported among the current dose levels. Among 7 pts with gastric cancer, 3 pts are confirmed to be CLDN 18.2 positive. One of these pts has maintained stable disease with tumor shrinkage for more than 6 months (treatment ongoing) at a dose of 0.9 mg/kg, demonstrating tolerability of ATG-022. One PR was observed in a gastric cancer pt (CLDN 18.2 expression to be determined) at the dosage of 1.8 mg/kg. It was noteworthy that a CR was seen in a gastric cancer pt dosed at 2.4 mg/kg, with negative CLDN 18.2 expression. PK analysis of ATG-022 from 0.3 to 2.4 mg/kg revealed that the exposure of total antibody, MMAE and ADC drug is increased as dose increased. No accumulation of ATG-022 was observed. Conclusions: ATG-022 demonstrated preliminary anti-tumor activity, tolerability, safety, as well as comparable PK properties at current dose levels. The high affinity of sub-nM grade of ATG-022 in pts with low CLDN 18.2 expression needs further investigation. The dose escalation is ongoing and updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT05718895 .
4CAST: A phase 1b dose exploration, open-label, single-center study evaluating the safety of INO-464 in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Authors: Dear Rachel Fitz-Gerald , Liu Jia (Jenny) , Cosman Rasha , Walsh Natalie , Selga Mariz , Perez San Juan Beatriz , Purcell Carley , Chaffer Christine Louise 
Published: July 2024

e13112 Background: Metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a poor prognosis and the development of new targeted therapies is an area of unmet need. The androgen receptor (AR) antagonist, INO-464, but not abiraterone or enzalutamide, blocks chemotherapy induced cell plasticity to inhibit and primary and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) growth. Single agent INO-464 at a dose of 450mg/d is well tolerated but has low efficacy. Laboratory data demonstrates suppression of metastatic TNBC and an increase in survival with the combination of INO-464 and taxane chemotherapy. Methods: We designed a Phase 1b open-label, single center dose exploration (Part 1) and dose expansion (Part 2) clinical trial of INO-464 450mg/d with docetaxel (IV 75mg/m2 q3wkly) or nab-paclitaxel (IV 100mg/m2 D1/8/15 q4wkly) in any subtype of MBC. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of INO-464 (450mg/d) and docetaxel or nab-paclitaxel utilizing a rolling 6 design, as well as to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose of INO-464 to be given with a taxane in the dose expansion study. Secondary objectives included anti-tumor activity and testosterone levels. Results: Recruitment began in August 2022. The cut-off date for this analysis was 19 January 2024. Eight patients have been treated to date and 6 patients were DLT evaluable. All were women with MBC with mean age of 56 (range 48-64) years. Patients had received a median of 5 (range 2 to 7) lines of chemotherapy for MBC. Patient 001 had G3 anaphylaxis due to docetaxel that resolved with adrenaline but came off study and was not DLT evaluable. The protocol was amended to give INO-464 with 1mg of dexamethasone. No DLTs were subsequently observed. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly low grade and chemotherapy related although G2 pneumonitis occurred beyond the DLT period in two patients, one of whom had prior sacituzimab govotecan-related pneumonitis. INO-464-related AEs were G1 fatigue/headache in 4/6 patients. Seven of seven patients had a best response (RECIST1.1) SD, and CA15.3 stability was seen in 4/7 patients. Baseline serum testosterone was detectable in 4/6 patients (range 0.5-1.3 nmol/L, lower limit of detection of <0.5), and remained undetectable or at the lower limit of detection throughout treatment. Conclusions: The MTD of INO-464 is 450mg daily with 0.5mg dexamethasone in combination with docetaxel or nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy. The combination is well tolerated with early efficacy signals. Dose expansion will test the combination in metastatic TNBC with nuclear AR positive breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04947189 .
Outstanding safety and efficacy data of IMC002, an autologous CLDN18.2-targeting CAR-T, in CLDN18.2+ advanced solid tumors.
Authors: Luo Tianhang , Lu Zhengmao , Zheng Rui , Zhou Jun , Wang Suqiong , Hao Ruidong , Sun Minmin 
Published: July 2024

e16012 Background: Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a promising therapeutic target for advanced solid tumors with CLDN18.2 expression. IMC002 is an autologous CLDN18.2-targeting CAR-T cell directed by a CLDN18.2-specific VHH, the specificity of which was confirmed by a membrane proteome array assay. Preclinical studies showed that IMC002 exhibited high tumor specificity, anti-tumor efficacy, and excellent safety profile in both cell and animal models. Methods: This is an open label first in human Phase 1 dose escalation study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IMC002 in advanced solid tumors with CLDN18.2 expression which is defined as CLDN18.2 expression of ≥1+ membrane staining intensity in ≥10% tumor cells. Accelerated titration followed by Bayesian optimal interval design was adopted with a total of 4 dose levels planned at 1, 3, 5 and 7 million (mil) CAR-T cells/kg respectively. All patients (pts) were given a single dose of IMC002 infusion after lymphodepletion chemotherapy. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated during the 28-day period after IMC002 infusion. Safety, anti-tumor activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were explored in this study. Here, we present preliminary safety and efficacy data for the pts dosed with up to 3 mil CAR-T cells/kg. Results: As of January 17, 2024, 3 advanced unresectable gastric cancer pts received IMC002 infusion, 1 patient at 1 mil CAR-T cells/kg and 2 pts at 3 mil CAR-T cells/kg. No DLT or SAE was reported. Manageable CRS (grade 1) was reported in all 3 pts. Other adverse events related to cell therapy included grade 1-2 lipase increase (3/3), diarrhea (1/3), pruritis (1/3) and γ-GGT increase (1/3). All adverse events recovered quickly. Preliminary efficacy data showed that best overall response of the 3 pts was all stable disease as evaluated by RECIST 1.1. The two pts at the dose level of 3 mil CAR-T cells/kg underwent successful radical surgery at week (W) 11 and 44 after IMC002 infusion respectively. Pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in the patient with surgery at W44. Distinct CAR-T cell expansion in peripheral blood was observed in all 3 pts, with the peak number of CAR+ cells reaching on day 7-11 in the peripheral blood after the infusion. Moreover, CAR-T cell infiltration was detected in the W11 and W44 surgical samples. Significant elevations of serum levels of IFN-γ, IL-10, IP-10, IL-2 and IL-6 were observed in the 3 pts. The trial is ongoing. Conclusions: IMC002 showed a favorable safety profile, encouraging anti-tumor activities with observed pCR and persistent expansion in the tumor tissue at the low dosage levels in pts with advanced CLDN18.2+ gastric cancer. In addition, our trial has successfully provided a surgical treatment opportunity after CAR-T therapy downstaging of unresectable gastric cancers. Clinical trial information: NCT05472857 .
Update results of anlotinib combined with penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial.
Authors: Chang Zhiwei , Liu Xiao-Lei , Yu Dan-Dan , Han Hui-Qiong , He Jian , Wang Rui-Rui , Jia Yong-Xu , Yan Jie , Qin Yanru 
Published: July 2024

e16017 Background: Recently, PD-1 blockades combined with dual chemotherapy in first-line setting exhibited encouraging efficacy for patients with ESCC. However, the safety profile of conventional dual chemotherapy remained unsatisfactory. Therefore, PD-1 blockades combined with anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and single chemotherapy regimen might be a promising strategy. Anlotinib, a novel multitarget TKI primarily targeting VEGFR1-3, demonstrated promising therapeutic activity as first-line combination therapy or second-line monotherapy for patients with ESCC in China clinically. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with penpulimab (PD-1 blockade) and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy in advanced ESCC. Preliminary results were presented at the 2024 ASCO-GI Symposium (Abs 340), the consecutively updated results were presented in this report. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced ESCC were recruited and treated with anlotinib (12mg, po, d1~14, q3w) and penpulimab (200mg, iv, d1, q3w) plus nab-paclitaxel (220mg/m2, iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 using CT scans every two cycles. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 30. Primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints included safety, ORR, DCR and OS. Results: From Jul 2022 to Dec 2023, a total of 27 patients were enrolled, 25 patients who had received first tumor response were included in this analysis. The best overall response indicated that there were 1 CR (4.0%), 18 PR (72.0%), 3 SD (12.0%) and 3 NE (12.0%). Therefore, the preliminary ORR was 76.0% (95%CI: 54.9%-90.6%), DCR was 88.0% (95%CI: 68.8%-97.5%). Median PFS of the 25 patients was not yet reached. Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events among the 27 patients with the incidence > 20% were anemia (40.7%), peripheral nerve toxicity (37.0) and white blood cell decreased (25.9%). Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were white blood cell decreased (7.4%), diarrhea (3.7%), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase was elevated (3.7%), glutamic oxalacetic transaminase increased (3.7%), hypertension (3.7%) and immune enteritis (3.7%). Conclusions: The combination of anlotinib plus penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ESCC demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profile. And the conclusions needed to be confirmed in subsequent trials.
Effect of two enteral immunonutrition formulas on immune function in Chinese patients with gastrointestinal cancers undergoing surgery: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
Authors: Xu Xuan , Liu Yan , Xiao Gang , Zhou Yanbing , Liang Bin , Wang Baogui , Kang Weiming , Ye Yingjiang , Liang Han , Lin Guole , Yu Jianchun , Chen Wei 
Published: July 2024

e16019 Background: Immunomodulating nutrition is believed to reduce systemic inflammation and postoperative complications in surgical patients.This study aimed to evaluate the impact of two enteral immunonutrition formulas (immune-enhanced formula and immune-modulating formula) on the immune function of Chinese patients following gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of immune function in perioperative enteral immunonutrition. Between October 2018 and September 2020, 308 patients undergoing resection and gastrointestinal reconstruction for gastrointestinal cancer received preoperative 5-day and postoperative 7-day feeding. They were randomly assigned in a double-blinded manner to either the immune-enhanced formula (intervention) or immune-modulating formula group (control). . The primary endpoints were the levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and CD4+/CD8+ ratio. Secondary endpoints included inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-6 levels. Results: Of the 308 patients included, 193 (62.7%) exhibited adequate compliance ( > 75%). Patients in the immune-enhanced formula group did not demonstrate significant differences in CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CRP, and IL-6 levels compared with the immune-modulating formula group. However, among patients with low prealbumin levels, the median difference in CD4+/CD8+ ratio on postoperative day 7 was 1.845 in the immune-enhanced formula group and 1.68 in the immune-modulating formula group ( P = 0·036). Conclusions: This study suggests that immunonutrition may significantly enhance immune function in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. In particular, our data indicate that immune-enhanced formula may be more effective in ameliorating immune responses in patients with compromised nutritional status, making them more responsive to immunonutrition. Clinical trial information: NCT03665714 .
Polymeric micellar paclitaxel plus cisplatin combined with tislelizumab as the first-line treatment of advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A phase II study.
Authors: Cao Guochun , Li Xiaoyou , Liu Delin , Zhu Jinghua 
Published: July 2024

e16022 Background: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has become the standard first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the prophylactic use of hormones, a routine preconditioning regimen of paclitaxel, may weaken the immune response. Polymeric micellar paclitaxel is a new formulation of paclitaxel without polyoxyethylene castor oil solvent, which do not need for pretreatment with anti-allergy drugs before administration. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of polymeric micellar paclitaxel (pm-Pac) plus cisplatin combined with tislelizumab for unresectable advanced ESCC. Methods: This is a single-center, single-arm, prospective phase II clinical trial. Stage IV ESCC patients diagnosed histologically or cytologically without systemic treatment are eligible for this study. Polymeric micellar paclitaxel plus cisplatin combined with tislelizumab was treated for 2 cycles. After imaging evaluation, if there was no disease progression, an additional two cycles of treatment were completed, followed by maintenance treatment with tislelizumab for one year. At day 1 of each therapy cycle, patients were given pm-Pac 230 mg/m2 followed by cisplatin 70 mg/m2 combined with tislelizumab 200 mg via intravenous infusion, every three weeks. This trial planned to include 30 patients. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) determined by the independent review committee. And the secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1), as well as the incidence and severity of adverse events. Results: From September 2022 to January 2024, 31 patients were included in the trial. Median age was 65 years, 29 (93.5%) patients were male. Median follow-up was 13.1 months, 2 patient achieved complete response (CR), 19 of them showed partial response (PR), 8 stable disease (SD), illustrating an ORR of 67.7% and a DCR of 93.5%. Median PFS was 7.3 months. The most common AEs were neutropenia (90.3%), nausea(83.8%) and thrombocytopenia (25.8%). No grade 3 or higher immune-related AE was observed, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The pm-Pac plus cisplatin combined with tislelizumab as first-line treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC showed effective without new safety signal. This combination therapy may have great efficacy, but multi-center randomized trials with larger sample size are warranted in further.
Efficacy and safety of SOX regimen combined with inetetamab as first-line treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.
Authors: Kong Ying , Dong Qi , Jin Peng , Li Yan Ming , Ma Li , Liu Yan Hai 
Published: July 2024

e16028 Background: Patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer have a poor prognosis. Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is the first-line standard treatment. Inetetamab is a novel anti-HER2 drug, and its efficacy and safety in gastric cancer have not been reported yet. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomly divided into two groups: one group received inetetamab combined with the SOX regimen, and the other group received trastuzumab combined with the SOX regimen. After 4-6 cycles, patients with stable disease received maintenance therapy. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Thirty-seven patients completed the trial, with 18 patients in the inetetamab group and 19 patients in the trastuzumab group. In the inetetamab group, the median PFS was 8.5 months, compared to 7.3 months in the trastuzumab group (P = 0.046), indicating a significant difference. The median OS was 15.3 months vs. 14.3 months (P = 0.46), and the ORR was 50% vs. 42% (P = 0.63), with no significant differences between groups. Common AEs included leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting. The incidence rates of grade ≥ 3 AEs were 56% in the inetetamab group and 47% in the trastuzumab group (P = 0.63), with no significant difference. Conclusions: In the first-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer, the efficacy of inetetamab and trastuzumab was comparable. The inetetamab group had superior PFS benefits, and both groups had good safety.