bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Meropenem Versus Ceftazidime in the Treatment of Cancer Patients With Febrile Neutropenia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
Authors: Feld Ronald , DePauw Ben , Berman Steven , Keating Armand , Ho Winston 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To compare meropenem, a carbapenem antibiotic, with ceftazidime for the empirical treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at medical centers in North America and the Netherlands. A total of 411 cancer patients (196 treated with meropenem and 215 treated with ceftazidime), who had 471 episodes of fever, participated in the trial. For each neutropenic episode, patients were allocated at random to receive intravenous administration of meropenem (1 g every 8 hours) or ceftazidime (2 g every 8 hours). Treatment could be modified at any time. Key end points were clinical and bacteriologic outcomes, eradication of infecting organism, and adverse events. RESULTS: The rate of successful clinical response at the end of therapy was significantly higher for patients treated with meropenem than for those on ceftazidime for all episodes (54% v 44%, respectively) and for episodes of fever of unknown origin (62% v 46%, respectively), but differences between groups were not statistically significant for clinically defined or microbiologically defined infections. Meropenem was significantly more effective than ceftazidime in severely neutropenic (≤ 100 cells/μL) patients (55% v 43%, respectively), bone marrow transplant patients (73% v 27%, respectively), and patients given antibiotic prophylaxis before study entry (71% v 52%, respectively). Common adverse effects of meropenem and ceftazidime therapy were rash, diarrhea, and nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Monotherapy with meropenem represents a suitable choice for initial empirical antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients.
Anastrozole Is Superior to Tamoxifen as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Results of a North American Multicenter Randomized Trial
Authors: Nabholtz J.M. , Buzdar A. , Pollak M. , Harwin W. , Burton G. , Mangalik A. , Steinberg M. , Webster A. , von Euler M. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: The efficacy and tolerability of anastrozole (Arimidex; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, and Macclesfield, United Kingdom) and tamoxifen were compared as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 353 postmenopausal women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was designed to evaluate anastrozole 1 mg once daily relative to tamoxifen 20 mg once daily in patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors or tumors of unknown receptor status who were eligible for endocrine therapy. Primary end points were objective response (OR), defined as complete (CR) or partial (PR) response, time to progression (TTP), and tolerability. RESULTS: Anastrozole was as effective as tamoxifen in terms of OR (21% v 17% of patients, respectively), with clinical benefit (CR + PR + stabilization ≥ 24 weeks) observed in 59% of patients on anastrozole and 46% on tamoxifen (two-sided P = .0098, retrospective analysis). Anastrozole had a significant advantage over tamoxifen in terms of TTP (median TTP of 11.1 and 5.6 months for anastrozole and tamoxifen, respectively; two-sided P = .005). The tamoxifen:anastrozole hazards ratio was 1.44 (lower one-sided 95% confidence limit, 1.16). Both treatments were well tolerated. However, thromboembolic events and vaginal bleeding were reported in fewer patients who received anastrozole compared with those who received tamoxifen (4.1% v 8.2% [thromboembolic events] and 1.2% v 3.8% [vaginal bleeding], respectively). CONCLUSION: Anastrozole satisfied the predefined criteria for equivalence to tamoxifen. Furthermore, we observed both a significant increase in TTP and a lower incidence of thromboembolic events and vaginal bleeding with anastrozole. These findings indicate that anastrozole should be considered as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
Immunotherapy of Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer With Antigen-Loaded Dendritic Cells
Authors: Small Eric J. , Fratesi Paige , Reese David M. , Strang George , Laus Reiner , Peshwa Madhusudan V. , Valone Frank H. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Provenge (Dendreon Corp, Seattle, WA) is an immunotherapy product consisting of autologous dendritic cells loaded ex vivo with a recombinant fusion protein consisting of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) linked to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Sequential phase I and phase II trials were performed to determine the safety and efficacy of Provenge and to assess its capacity to break immune tolerance to the normal tissue antigen PAP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Dendritic-cell precursors were harvested by leukapheresis in weeks 0, 4, 8, and 24, loaded ex vivo with antigen for 2 days, and then infused intravenously over 30 minutes. Phase I patients received increasing doses of Provenge, and phase II patients received all the Provenge that could be prepared from a leukapheresis product. RESULTS: Patients tolerated treatment well. Fever, the most common adverse event, occurred after 15 infusions (14.7%). All patients developed immune responses to the recombinant fusion protein used to prepare Provenge, and 38% developed immune responses to PAP. Three patients had a more than 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and another three patients had 25% to 49% decreases in PSA. The time to disease progression correlated with development of an immune response to PAP and with the dose of dendritic cells received. CONCLUSION: Provenge is a novel immunotherapy agent that is safe and breaks tolerance to the tissue antigen PAP. Preliminary evidence for clinical efficacy warrants further exploration.
Phase II Study of Vinorelbine in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Authors: Steele Jeremy P. C. , Shamash Jonathan , Evans Marie T. , Gower Nicole H. , Tischkowitz Marc D. , Rudd Robin M. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response rate and impact on quality of life of vinorelbine given as cycles of 30 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks to patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma were enrolled (26 male patients and three female patients; median age, 58 years [range, 29 to 77 years]). Seventeen patients had epithelioid tumors, two had sarcomatoid tumors, and 10 had biphasic tumors. The International Mesothelioma Interest Group staging system was used: one patient had stage Ib disease, 10 had stage II disease, eight had stage III disease, and 10 had stage IV disease. Patients were treated with weekly injections of vinorelbine 30 mg/m2. A cycle consisted of six weekly injections. The new guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors were used. Responses were measured by spiral computed tomography scan. RESULTS: All twenty-nine patients had measurable disease and were assessed for response. There were seven partial responses (24% [95% confidence interval, 10% to 44%]), 16 patients had stable disease (55%), and six patients had disease progression on therapy (21%). The median number of vinorelbine injections was 12 (range, 2 to 30). Quality-of-life analyses showed a benefit for vinorelbine therapy. CONCLUSION: Vinorelbine shows promise in the palliation of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. The relatively low toxicity of the drug suggests that trials of vinorelbine in combination with other agents should be feasible.
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Camptothecin Analog DX-8951f Administered as a 30-Minute Infusion Every 3 Weeks in Patients With Advanced Cancer
Authors: Boige Valérie , Raymond Eric , Faivre Sandrine , Gatineau Michel , Meely Kathleen , Mekhaldi S. , Pautier Patricia , Ducreux Michel , Rixe Olivier , Armand Jean-Pierre 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: DX-8951f is a totally synthetic derivative of camptothecin with greater cytotoxicity and more potent topoisomerase I inhibition than SN-38, topotecan, and camptothecin in preclinical studies. This phase I study aimed to describe the toxicity and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of DX-8951f given as a 30-minute intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with refractory solid malignancies were treated with DX-8951f at dose levels ranging from 4 to 7.1 mg/m2. All but one patient had received previous chemotherapy, and eight patients were considered heavily pretreated. Total DX-8951f plasma concentrations were assayed using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Thirty-six cycles of DX-8951f were administered. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity, and it was dose-related, reversible, and noncumulative. Other toxicities included nausea and vomiting, alopecia, asthenia, fever, and anemia. Grade 1 or 2 diarrhea was observed in seven patients but was transient and resolved without requiring treatment. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that DX-8951f had a half-life of 7.15 hours and a clearance rate of 1.65 L/h·m2. The DX-8951f area under the plasma-concentration curve increased linearly with the dose. We defined the MTD of DX-8951f administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion every 3 weeks as 7.1 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: The dose-limiting toxicity of DX-8951f is neutropenia. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 5.33 mg/m2 every 3 weeks in patients previously treated with chemotherapy.
Received Dose and Dose-Intensity of Chemotherapy and Outcome in Nonmetastatic Extremity Osteosarcoma
Authors: Lewis Ian J. , Weeden Simon , Machin David , Stark Dan , Craft Alan W. ,   for the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between received dose, received dose-intensity (RDI), and survival in patients with osteosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1983 and 1993, the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EOI) conducted two randomized trials involving patients with high-grade, nonmetastatic, biopsy-proven osteosarcoma of the extremity. These trials shared a common treatment arm of doxorubicin (DOX) 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin (CDDP) 100 mg/m2 planned for six cycles at 3-week intervals. Definitive surgery was scheduled at week 9, after three cycles. Survival time was calculated from 122 days, the scheduled end of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients randomized to DOX/CDDP received at least one cycle of chemotherapy, and 232 (81%) received all six cycles. On average, 79% of the intended dose of DOX and 80% of the intended dose of CDDP was given. Mean time to completion of chemotherapy was 1.27 times that specified by the protocol. Mean RDI was 0.64 for DOX (SD = 0.19) and 0.65 for CDDP (SD = 0.18). Progression-free survival was lower for those who received one to five cycles compared with those who completed all six cycles (hazards ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 2.78). Survival and progression-free survival were lowest for patients with RDI less than 0.6, although these differences were not statistically significant at the 5% level. There was no clear evidence of preoperative dose or dose-intensity influencing histologic response. CONCLUSION: This analysis did not establish a clear survival benefit for increasing received dose or dose-intensity in the context of this two-drug regimen. The hypothesis that increasing dose-intensity may improve survival in osteosarcoma requires prospective evaluation.
Phase II Feasibility Study of Sequential Couplets of Cisplatin/Topotecan Followed by Paclitaxel/Cisplatin as Primary Treatment for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study
Authors: Hoskins P. , Eisenhauer E. , Vergote I. , Dubuc-Lissoir J. , Fisher B. , Grimshaw R. , Oza A. , Plante M. , Stuart G. , Vermorken J. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Despite the improved results in advanced ovarian cancer achieved with the addition of paclitaxel to frontline therapy, there remains room for improvement. One approach is to add new agents such as topotecan. Because myelosuppression limits the delivery of topotecan with paclitaxel/cisplatin in a three-drug combination, we explored giving sequential couplets of cisplatin/topotecan followed by paclitaxel/cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma after primary surgery were studied. Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5 were administered at 21-day intervals for four cycles, followed by interval debulking surgery (if optimal debulking was not achieved with primary surgery), and then paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 over 24 hours on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 2 at 21-day intervals for four cycles. RESULTS: Such sequential couplets are feasible. Myelotoxicity was the major toxic effect, but it was of short duration. The granulocyte nadir with topotecan/cisplatin occurred late (median, day 18), so retreatment on day 21 was not always possible. There was no unexpected nonhematologic toxicity. The regimen was active in this group of patients who had undergone largely suboptimal debulking surgery. In 34 patients with clinically measurable disease, the overall response rate was 78%, and 30 (77%) of the 39 patients with elevated CA 125 levels at baseline had normalization of CA 125 levels by the end of therapy. CONCLUSION: Sequential couplets of cisplatin/topotecan followed by paclitaxel/cisplatin are feasible. The efficacy data in this suboptimal group of patients has encouraged us to proceed with a randomized study based on this approach.
Outcome of Patients Receiving Radiation for Cancer of the Esophagus: Results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study
Authors: Coia Lawrence R. , Minsky Bruce D. , Berkey Brian A. , John Madhu J. , Haller Daniel , Landry Jerome , Pisansky Thomas M. , Willett Christopher G. , Hoffman John P. , Owen Jean B. , Hanks Gerald E. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: A Patterns of Care Study examined the records of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) treated with radiation in 1992 through 1994 to determine the national practice processes of care and outcomes and to compare the results with those of clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national survey of 63 institutions was conducted using two-stage cluster sampling, and specific information was collected on 400 patients with squamous cell (62%) or adenocarcinoma (37%) of the thoracic esophagus who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of primary or adjuvant treatment. Patients were staged according to a modified 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Fifteen percent of patients had clinical stage (CS) I disease, 40% had CS II disease, and 30% had CS III disease. Twenty-six percent of patients underwent esophagectomy. Seventy-five percent of patients received chemotherapy; 84% of these received concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (CRT). RESULTS: Significant variables for overall survival in multivariate analysis include the use of esophagectomy (risk ratio [RR] = 0.62), the use of chemotherapy (RR = 0.63), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) greater than 80 (RR = 0.61), CS I or II disease (RR = 0.66), and facility type (RR = 0.72). Age, sex, and histology were not significant. Preoperative CRT resulted in a nonsignificantly higher 2-year survival rate compared with definitive CRT alone (63% v 39%; P = .11), whereas 2-year survival by planned treatment rather than treatment given was 47.7% for preoperative CRT and 35.4% for definitive CRT (P = .23). Definitive CRT compared with definitive RT alone resulted in significantly higher 2-year survival (39% v 20.6%; P = .027) and lower 2-year local regional failure (30% v 57.9%; P = .0031). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the value of CRT in EC treatment. It indicates that the results obtained in practice settings nationwide are similar to those obtained in clinical trials and that KPS and the 1983 clinical staging system are useful prognostic indicators. The suggested value of esophagectomy and superiority of preoperative CRT over CRT alone in this study should be tested in a randomized trial.
Results of Treatment With Hyper-CVAD, a Dose-Intensive Regimen, in Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
Authors: Kantarjian Hagop M. , O’Brien Susan , Smith Terry L. , Cortes Jorge , Giles Francis J. , Beran Miloslav , Pierce Sherry , Huh Yang , Andreeff Michael , Koller Charles , Ha Chul S. , Keating Michael J. , Murphy Sharon , Freireich Emil J. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone), a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with newly diagnosed ALL referred since 1992 were entered onto the study; treatment was initiated in 204 patients between 1992 and January 1998. No exclusions were made because of older age, poor performance status, organ dysfunction, or active infection. Median age was 39.5 years; 37% were at least 50 years old. Mature B-cell disease (Burkitt type) was present in 9%, T-cell disease in 17%. Leukocytosis of more than 30 × 109/L was found in 26%, Philadelphia chromosome–positive disease in 16% (20% of patients with assessable metaphases), CNS leukemia at the time of diagnosis in 7%, and a mediastinal mass in 7%. Treatment consisted of four cycles of Hyper-CVAD alternating with four cycles of high-dose methotrexate (MTX) and cytarabine therapy, together with intrathecal CNS prophylaxis and supportive care with antibiotic prophylaxis and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy. Maintenance in patients with nonmature B-cell ALL included 2 years of treatment with mercaptopurine, MTX, vincristine, and prednisone (POMP). RESULTS: Overall, 185 patients (91%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 12 (6%) died during induction therapy. Estimated 5-year survival and 5-year CR rates were 39% and 38%, respectively. The incidence of CNS relapse was low (4%). Compared with 222 patients treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) regimens, our patients had a better CR rate (91% v 75%, P < .01) and CR rate after one course (74% v 55%, P < .01) and better survival (P < .01), and a smaller percentage had more than 5% day 14 blasts (34% v 48%, P = .01). Previous prognostic models remained predictive for outcome with Hyper-CVAD therapy. CONCLUSION: Hyper-CVAD therapy is superior to our previous regimens and should be compared with established regimens in adult ALL.
Survival in Early Breast Cancer Patients Is Favorably Influenced by a Natural Humoral Immune Response to Polymorphic Epithelial Mucin
Authors: von Mensdorff-Pouilly S. , Verstraeten A.A. , Kenemans P. , Snijdewint F.G. M. , Kok A. , Van Kamp G.J. , Paul M.A. , Van Diest P.J. , Meijer S. , Hilgers J. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Polymorphic epithelial mucin (PEM or MUC1) is being studied as a vaccine substrate for the immunotherapy of patients with adenocarcinoma. The present study analyzes the incidence of naturally occurring MUC1 antibodies in early breast cancer patients and relates the presence of these antibodies in pretreatment serum to outcome of disease.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to MUC1 with an enzyme-linked immunoassay (PEM.CIg), which uses a MUC1 triple-tandem repeat peptide conjugated to bovine serum albumin, in pretreatment serum samples obtained from 154 breast cancer patients (52 with stage I disease and 102 with stage II) and 302 controls. The median disease-specific survival time of breast cancer patients was 74 months (range, 15 to 118 months). A positive test result was defined as MUC1 IgG or IgM antibody levels equal to or greater than the corresponding rounded-up median results obtained in the total breast cancer population.RESULTS: A positive test result for both MUC1 IgG and IgM antibodies in pretreatment serum was associated with a significant benefit in disease-specific survival in stage I and II (P = .0116) breast cancer patients. Positive IgG and IgM MUC1 antibody levels had significant additional prognostic value to stage (P = .0437) in multivariate analysis. Disease-free survival probability did not differ significantly. However, stage II patients who tested positive for MUC1 IgG and IgM antibody and who relapsed had predominantly local recurrences or contralateral disease, as opposed to recurrences at distant sites in the patients with a negative humoral response (P = .026).CONCLUSION: Early breast cancer patients with a natural humoral response to MUC1 have a higher probability of freedom from distant failure and a better disease-specific survival. MUC1 antibodies may control hematogenic tumor dissemination and outgrowth by aiding the destruction of circulating or seeded MUC1-expressing tumor cells. Vaccination of breast cancer patients with MUC1-derived (glyco)peptides in an adjuvant setting may favorably influence the outcome of disease.
Alterations of Chromosome Arms 1p and 19q as Predictors of Survival in Oligodendrogliomas, Astrocytomas, and Mixed Oligoastrocytomas
Authors: Smith Justin S. , Perry Arie , Borell Thomas J. , Lee Hyun K. , O’Fallon Judith , Hosek Sandra M. , Kimmel David , Yates Allan , Burger Peter C. , Scheithauer Bernd W. , Jenkins Robert B. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: A recent report suggests that alterations of chromosome arms 1p and 19q are associated with chemotherapeutic response and overall survival in anaplastic oligodendroglioma patients treated with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine chemotherapy. We set out to further clarify the diagnostic and prognostic implications of these alterations in a broader set of diffuse gliomas, including astrocytic neoplasms and low-grade oligodendrogliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) signals from DNA probes mapping to 1p and 19q common deletion regions were enumerated in 162 diffuse gliomas (79 astrocytomas, 52 oligodendrogliomas, and 31 mixed oligoastrocytomas), collected as part of an ongoing prospective investigation of CNS tumors. RESULTS: The oligodendroglial phenotype was highly associated with loss of 1p (P = .0002), loss of 19q (P < .0001), and combined loss of 1p and 19q (P < .0001). Combined loss of 1p and 19q was identified as a univariate predictor of prolonged overall survival among patients with pure oligodendroglioma (log-rank, P = .03) and remained a significant predictor after adjusting for the effects of patient age and tumor grade (P < .01). This favorable association was not evident in patients with astrocytoma or mixed oligoastrocytoma. CONCLUSION: Combined loss of 1p and 19q is a statistically significant predictor of prolonged survival in patients with pure oligodendroglioma, independent of tumor grade. Given the lack of this association in patients with astrocytic neoplasms and the previously demonstrated chemosensitivity of oligodendrogliomas, a combined approach of histologic and genotypic assessment could potentially improve existing strategies for patient stratification and management.