B-105 Farr Radioimmunoprecipitation Method Enhances Serial Monitoring of Quantitative Anti-dsDNA (double-stranded) Antibody Measurements in Lupus
Authors: Yang J M , Yeo L , Galdamezmelgar W , Bastidas M , Chun K Y 
Published: October 2024

Abstract

Background
Anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies are an important criterion in the diagnosis, classification, and management of systemic lupus erythematous (SLE). High avidity anti-dsDNA IgG may be more clinically relevant and specific for SLE. As such, radioimmunoassay according to the Farr technique (Farr-RIPA) is often considered more sensitive and quantitative than enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence assay (CLIFT) methods.

Methods
Measurements of anti-dsDNA antibodies in 147,016 serum patient samples were obtained by lab-developed Farr-RIPA. Serum with endogenous antibodies binds to 125I-radiolabelled dsDNA and undergoes subsequent immunoprecipitation under high salt conditions which selects for highly avidity anti-dsDNA antibodies. The analytic measurement range (AMR) of the assay is 5.7 to 85 IU/mL, and dilutional linearity is validated to 68,000 IU/mL for results &gt;85 (ULOQ). Inter-assay precision is &lt;10% CV.

Results
Of 147,016 measured samples, 5.4% (7800) were positive for anti-ds DNA antibodies (mean 251.7) with numeric values, ranging from 8.0 to 55,399 IU/mL. The numeric distribution of all positive results was such that 76% (5859/7800) were between 8.0 - 60 IU/mL, and the median was 19.4 with an interquartile range (IQR) of 36.1. A small percentage (3.9%) had very high anti-dsDNA levels greater than 1000 IU/mL and 0.4% (35/7800) were greater than 10,000 IU/mL.
Serial measurements comprised almost half (45.5%) of all positives, occurring in 1016 unique patients an average of 3.5 levels within a 2-year time frame. A fifth of those patients, 200, were more frequently monitored with at least 4 levels. Of patients with the very highest dsDNA (&gt;10,000), we analyzed the results of 17 unique patients who were frequently monitored an average of 6.1 times. Peak and nadir values yielded a mean delta of 20,751 with a mean of 264 days elapsing between peak and nadir. All except one showed a marked decrease in Anti-dsDNA over time with an average decrease of 15,685 IU/mL.

Conclusions
Here, we performed 147,016 Anti-dsDNA antibody measurements by Farr-RIPA, a precise method with a broad analytic range as compared to other methods which have a limited upper limit of quantitation or are semi-quantitative. Our 7800 positive Farr-RIPA results exhibited quantitative results from 8.0 to 55,399 IU/mL. The median of 19.4 and IQR of 36.1 showed most results to be &lt;55.5 IU/mL. Very high levels &gt;300 and &gt;1000 IU/mL were seen in 10% and 4% of patient samples, respectively. Serial monitoring was frequent. In patients with the very highest levels &gt;10,000, an-eight fold decrease in peak Anti-dsDNA levels was achieved over a mean of 264 days with more than half (9/17) achieving levels &lt;250. The ability to detect and meaningfully monitor these patients is enhanced by the Farr-RIPA method. In conclusion, in 7800 positive samples, we demonstrated a wide range of inter- and intra-patient numeric Anti-dsDNA concentrations that denote the clinical usefulness of serial monitoring by Farr-RIPA.