bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine Versus Vinorelbine Alone in Elderly Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Authors: Frasci Giuseppe , Lorusso Vito , Panza Nicola , Comella Pasquale , Nicolella Gianpaolo , Bianco Andrea , De Cataldis Giuseppe , Iannelli Annunziato , Bilancia Domenico , Belli Mario , Massidda Bruno , Piantedosi Francovito , Comella Giuseppe , De Lena Mario 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the addition of gemcitabine (G) to vinorelbine (V) improves survival and quality of life (QoL) among elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSCLC aged ≥ 70 years with advanced disease were randomly allocated to receive V 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks or G 1,200 mg/m2 + V 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The estimated sample size was 120 patients per arm, but an interim analysis of survival was planned based on the first 60 patients per arm. RESULTS: In May 1999, the survival data were analyzed of 120 eligible patients (V group = 60; G + V group = 60) who had been randomized from June 1997 to February 1999. Forty-nine patients had stage IIIB disease, and 71 had stage IV. At a median potential follow-up of 14 months (range, 3 to 22 months), 93 patients had died (G + V group = 41; V group = 52). In the G + V group, median survival time was 29 weeks and projected 1-year survival was 30%; these values were 18 weeks and 13% in the V group. According to multivariate Cox analysis, the risk of death in the G + V arm compared with the V arm was 0.48 (95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.79; P < .01). Combination therapy was also associated with a clear delay in symptom and QoL deterioration. The overall response rates were 22% and 15% in the G + V and V groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with NSCLC, G + V treatment is associated with significantly better survival than is V alone.
Gemcitabine in Combination With Doxorubicin in Advanced Breast Cancer: Final Results of a Phase II Pharmacokinetic Trial
Authors: Pérez-Manga G. , Lluch A. , Alba E. , Moreno-Nogueira J.A. , Palomero M. , García-Conde J. , Khayat D. , Rivelles N. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine has promising single-agent activity in advanced breast disease. The aim of this phase II study was to determine the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetic profile of gemcitabine administered with doxorubicin as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 42 women with metastatic breast cancer (age 33 to 74 years; mean age, 55 years), 13 were chemotherapy-naive and 29 had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Gemcitabine (800 or 1,000 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (25 mg/m2) were administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Blood samples were drawn on day 8 of cycles 1, 2, and 3 and of subsequent odd cycles for gemcitabine pharmacokinetic determinations and before and after the first dose of cycle 1 or 2 for doxorubicin determinations. RESULTS: There were three complete and 20 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 70%) and a complete response rate of 7%. The median survival time for all 42 patients was 27 months (95% CI, 13.4 to 30.0 months) and the 1-year survival rate was 80%. Toxicity was mainly hematologic. The disposition of both drugs was unchanged when they were administered on the same day compared with when they were given singly. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (25 mg/m2) can be safely administered using a weekly schedule. The disposition of both drugs is unchanged when they are administered on the same day. This combination shows promising activity with acceptable toxicity compared with other combination therapies.
Tandem High-Dose Therapy in Rapid Sequence for Children With High-Risk Neuroblastoma
Authors: Grupp Stephan A. , Stern Julie W. , Bunin Nancy , Nancarrow Cheryl , Ross Amy A. , Mogul Mark , Adams Roberta , Grier Holcombe E. , Gorlin Jed B. , Shamberger Robert , Marcus Karen , Neuberg Donna , Weinstein Howard J. , Diller Lisa 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Advances in chemotherapy and supportive care have slowly improved survival rates for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. The focus of many of these chemotherapeutic advances has been dose intensification. In this phase II trial involving children with advanced neuroblastoma, we used a program of induction chemotherapy followed by tandem high-dose, myeloablative treatments (high-dose therapy) with stem-cell rescue (HDT/SCR) in rapid sequence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients underwent induction chemotherapy during which peripheral-blood stem and progenitor cells were collected and local control measures undertaken. Patients then received tandem courses of HDT/SCR, 4 to 6 weeks apart. Thirty-nine patients (age 1 to 12 years) were assessable, and 70 cycles of HDT/SCR were completed. RESULTS: Pheresis was possible in the case of all patients, despite their young ages, with an average of 7.2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg available to support each cycle. Engraftment was rapid; median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 days. Four patients who completed the first HDT course did not complete the second, and there were three deaths due to toxicity. With a median follow-up of 22 months (from diagnosis), 26 of 39 patients remained event-free. The 3-year event-free survival rate for these patients was 58%. CONCLUSION: A tandem HDT/SCR regimen for high-risk neuroblastoma is a feasible treatment strategy for children and may improve disease-free survival.
Telomerase Activity and Telomerase Subunits Gene Expression Patterns in Neuroblastoma: A Molecular and Immunohistochemical Study Establishing Prognostic Tools for Fresh-Frozen and Paraffin-Embedded Tissues
Authors: Poremba Christopher , Scheel Christina , Hero Barbara , Christiansen Holger , Schaefer Karl-Ludwig , Nakayama Jun-ichi , Berthold Frank , Juergens Heribert , Boecker Werner , Dockhorn-Dworniczak Barbara 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: We have recently demonstrated that telomerase activity (TA) is an independent prognostic factor in neuroblastomas. In the present study, the prognostic impact of TA and gene expression of the three major telomerase subunits is evaluated by molecular and immunohistochemical techniques in fresh-frozen and paraffin-embedded tissues. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-three neuroblastomas of all stages were analyzed for TA. The TA levels of 75 neuroblastoma cases were correlated with gene expression of telomerase subunits hTRT, human telomerase RNA (hTR), and telomerase protein 1 (TP1) by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), using an innovative approach on the LightCycler instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). For selected cases, the applicability of RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry for hTRT expression analysis was investigated in paraffin-embedded tissues. TA and subunit expression patterns were correlated with traditional prognostic indicators and disease outcome. RESULTS: TA was present in a total of 39 (29.3%) of 133 neuroblastomas and in 31 (29.8%) of 104 initial neuroblastomas without cytotoxic pretreatment. TA was significantly correlated with both event-free and overall survival (P < .0001). Furthermore, we found a significant correlation between expression levels of TA and hTRT (P < .0001) as well as hTR (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed only TA and tumor stage but not serum lactate dehydrogenase, MYCN amplification, or age at diagnosis as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The significant correlation with clinical outcome strongly recommends that analysis of TA be incorporated into the clinical investigation of each individual neuroblastoma at the time of diagnosis. Because the mere presence or absence of TA without further quantification is sufficient basis for predicting disease outcome, the telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay could be complemented with but not replaced by analysis of hTRT or hTR expression.
Activity of Thalidomide in AIDS-Related Kaposi’s Sarcoma
Authors: Little Richard F. , Wyvill Kathleen M. , Pluda James M. , Welles Lauri , Marshall Vickie , Figg William D. , Newcomb Fonda M. , Tosato Giovanna , Feigal Ellen , Steinberg Seth M. , Whitby Denise , Goedert James J. , Yarchoan Robert 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To assess the toxicity and activity of oral thalidomide in Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) in a phase II dose-escalation study.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–seropositive patients with biopsy-confirmed KS that progressed over the 2 months before enrollment received an initial dose of 200 mg/d of oral thalidomide in a phase II study. The dose was increased to a maximum of 1,000 mg/d for up to 1 year. Anti-HIV therapy was maintained during the study period. Toxicity, tumor response, immunologic and angiogenic factors, and virologic parameters were assessed.RESULTS: Twenty patients aged 29 to 49 years with a median CD4 count of 246 cells/mm3(range, 14 to 646 cells/mm3) were enrolled. All patients were assessable for toxicity, and 17 for response. Drowsiness in nine and depression in seven patients were the most frequent toxicities observed. Eight (47%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 23% to 72%) of the 17 assessable patients achieved a partial response, and an additional two patients had stable disease. Based on all 20 patients treated, the response rate was 40% (95% CI, 19% to 64%). The median thalidomide dose at the time of response was 500 mg/d (range, 400 to 1,000 mg/d). The median duration of drug treatment was 6.3 months, and the median time to progression was 7.3 months.CONCLUSION: Oral thalidomide was tolerated in this population at doses up to 1,000 mg/d for as long as 12 months and was found to induce clinically meaningful anti-KS responses in a sizable subset of the patients. Additional studies of this agent in KS are warranted.
Gemcitabine and Cisplatin as Induction Regimen for Patients With Biopsy-Proven Stage IIIA N2 Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group (EORTC 08955)
Authors: Van Zandwijk N. , Smit E.F. , Kramer G.W. P. , Schramel F. , Gans S. , Festen J. , Termeer A. , Schlosser N.J. J. , Debruyne C. , Curran D. , Giaccone G. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Our objective was to better define the activity/feasibility of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) as induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA N2 non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) followed by surgery or radiotherapy within a large, ongoing comparative study (EORTC 08941). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC, median age of 58 years, stage IIIA N2 disease, World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1, and the ability to tolerate a pneumonectomy received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2, every 4 weeks. Patients received induction chemotherapy (three cycles) before re-evaluation and randomization to surgery or radiotherapy. RESULTS: Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, the main hematologic toxicity, occurred in 60% of patients but was not associated with bleeding. Full-dose gemcitabine was given in 48% of the courses. Severe nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon. Two patients with preexisting, autoimmune pulmonary fibrosis had deterioration of pulmonary function after radiotherapy. Thirty-three (70.2%; 95% confidence interval, 55.1% to 82.7%) of the 47 eligible patients had objective responses (three complete responses and 30 partial responses). Mediastinal nodes were tumor-free after induction therapy in 53% of cases. Resections were considered complete in 71% of the patients who underwent thoracotomy after induction therapy. Median survival for all recruited patients (N = 53) was 18.9 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 69%. CONCLUSION: In patients with N2 stage IIIA NSCLC, GC is a highly active and well-tolerated induction regimen. GC should be explored in combination with surgery or radiotherapy in stage I and II patients.
Phase II Evaluation of Thalidomide in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
Authors: Baidas Said M. , Winer Eric P. , Fleming Gini F. , Harris Lyndsay , Pluda James M. , Crawford Jeanette G. , Yamauchi Hideko , Isaacs Claudine , Hanfelt John , Tefft Mariella , Flockhart David , Johnson Michael D. , Hawkins Michael J. , Lippman Marc E. , Hayes Daniel F. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and effect on serum angiogenic growth factors of two dose levels of thalidomide in patients with metastatic breast cancer.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either daily 200 mg of thalidomide or 800 mg to be escalated to 1,200 mg. Fourteen heavily pretreated patients were assigned to each dose level. Each cycle consisted of 8 weeks of treatment. Pharmacokinetics and growth factor serum levels were evaluated.RESULTS: No patient had a true partial or complete response. On the 800-mg arm, 13 patients had progressive disease at or before 8 weeks of treatment and one refused to continue treatment. The dose was reduced because of somnolence to 600 mg for five patients and to 400 mg for two and was increased for one to 1,000 mg and for four to 1,200 mg. On the 200-mg arm, 12 patients had progressive disease at or before 8 weeks and two had stable disease at 8 weeks, of whom one was removed from study at week 11 because of grade 3 neuropathy and the other had progressive disease at week 16. Dose-limiting toxicities included somnolence and neuropathy. Adverse events that did not require dose or schedule modifications included constipation, fatigue, dry mouth, dizziness, nausea, anorexia, arrhythmia, headaches, skin rash, hypotension, and neutropenia. Evaluation of circulating angiogenic factors and pharmacokinetic studies failed to provide insight into the reason for the lack of efficacy.CONCLUSION: Single-agent thalidomide has little or no activity in patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer. Further studies that include different patient populations and/or combinations with other agents might be performed at the lower dose levels.
Survival Advantage From Higher-Dose Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Treated on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trials
Authors: Valicenti Richard , Lu Jiandong , Pilepich Miljenko , Asbell Sucha , Grignon David 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of external-beam radiation therapy on disease-specific survival (death from causes related to prostate cancer) and overall survival in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: From 1975 to 1992, 1,465 men with clinically localized prostate cancer received radiation therapy on four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group phase III randomized trials and were pooled for this analysis. No one received androgen-deprivation therapy with his initial treatment. All original histology had central pathologic review for grading using the Gleason classification system. Total delivered radiation dose ranged from 60 to 78 Gy (median, 68.4 Gy). The median follow-up time was 8 years. RESULTS: A Cox regression model revealed that Gleason score was an independent predictor of disease-specific survival and overall survival. The 10-year disease-specific survival rates by Gleason score were as follows: score of 2 through 5, 85%; score of 6, 79%; score of 7, 62%; and score of 8 through 10, 43%. Stratifying outcome by this important prognostic factor revealed that higher radiation dose was a significant predictor for improved disease-specific survival and overall survival only for those patients whose cancers had Gleason scores of 8 through 10 (P < .05). After adjusting for clinical T stage, nodal status, and age, treating with a higher radiation dose was associated with a 29% lower relative risk of death from prostate cancer and 27% reduced mortality rate (P < .05). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that higher-dose radiation therapy can significantly reduce the risk of dying from prostate cancer in men with clinically localized disease. This survival benefit is restricted to men with poorly differentiated cancers.
Evaluating the Financial Impact of Clinical Trials in Oncology: Results From a Pilot Study From the Association of American Cancer Institutes/Northwestern University Clinical Trials Costs and Charges Project
Authors: Bennett Charles L. , Stinson Tammy J. , Vogel Victor , Robertson Lyn , Leedy Donald , O’Brien Patrick , Hobbs Jane , Sutton Tamara , Ruckdeschel John C. , Chirikos Thomas N. , Weiner Roy S. , Ramsey Marguerite M. , Wicha Max S. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Medical care for clinical trials is often not reimbursed by insurers, primarily because of concern that medical care as part of clinical trials is expensive and not part of standard medical practice. In June 2000, President Clinton ordered Medicare to reimburse for medical care expenses incurred as part of cancer clinical trials, although many private insurers are concerned about the expense of this effort. To inform this policy debate, the costs and charges of care for patients on clinical trials are being evaluated. In this Association of American Cancer Institutes (AACI) Clinical Trials Costs and Charges pilot study, we describe the results and operational considerations of one of the first completed multisite economic analyses of clinical trials. METHODS: Our pilot effort included assessment of total direct medical charges for 6 months of care for 35 case patients who received care on phase II clinical trials and for 35 matched controls (based on age, sex, disease, stage, and treatment period) at five AACI member cancer centers. Charge data were obtained for hospital and ancillary services from automated claims files at individual study institutions. The analyses were based on the perspective of a third-party payer. RESULTS: The mean age of the phase II clinical trial patients was 58.3 years versus 57.3 years for control patients. The study population included persons with cancer of the breast (n = 24), lung (n = 18), colon (n = 16), prostate (n = 4), and lymphoma (n = 8). The ratio of male-to-female patients was 3:4, with greater than 75% of patients having stage III to IV disease. Total mean charges for treatment from the time of study enrollment through 6 months were similar: $57,542 for clinical trial patients and $63,721 for control patients (1998 US$; P = .4) CONCLUSION: Multisite economic analyses of oncology clinical trials are in progress. Strategies that are not likely to overburden data managers and clinicians are possible to devise. However, these studies require careful planning and coordination among cancer center directors, finance department personnel, economists, and health services researchers.
Preoperative Prediction of Surgical Margin Status in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated by Radical Prostatectomy
Authors: Cheng Liang , Slezak Jeff , Bergstralh Erik J. , Myers Robert P. , Zincke Horst , Bostwick David G. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the preoperative factors associated with surgical margin status in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 339 patients who were treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Mayo Clinic. None received preoperative adjuvant therapy. The mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range, 45 to 79 years). All specimens were totally embedded and whole-mounted. Positive surgical margin was defined as the presence of cancer cells at the inked margins. Numerous pathologic characteristics in needle biopsies and preoperative clinical findings were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall margin positivity rate was 24%. In univariate analysis, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, perineural invasion, percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens, and number and percentage of biopsy cores involved by cancer were all associated with positive surgical margins. In multivariate analysis, preoperative serum PSA level (odds ratio for a doubling of PSA levels, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.4; P < .001) and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens (odds ratio for a 10% increase, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.4; P < .001) were predictive of margin status in radical prostatectomy. With use of preoperative serum PSA level and percentage of cancer in the biopsy as predictors of surgical margins, the overall accuracy as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74. CONCLUSION: Preoperative serum PSA level and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens were independently associated with surgical margin status in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. The combination of these two factors provides a high level of predictive accuracy for margin status.
First-Line Chemotherapy With Local Treatment Can Prevent External-Beam Irradiation and Enucleation in Low-Stage Intraocular Retinoblastoma
Authors: Beck M. Nenadov , Balmer A. , Dessing C. , Pica A. , Munier F. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy (CT) in preventing external-beam radiotherapy (EBR) and/or enucleation in patients with retinoblastoma (Rbl). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with newly diagnosed unilateral or bilateral Rbl received CT associated with local treatment (LT). Two to five courses of etoposide and carboplatin were administered at 3- to 4-week intervals, depending on tumor response, and were completed each time by LT. RESULTS: Tumor response was observed in all eyes. Twenty-one of 24 patients showed a complete response (CR) that persisted at a median follow-up (FU) of 31 months (range, 4 to 41 months). Among the three patients who relapsed, two were lost to FU and one died of progressive disease. CR was achieved by CT and LT alone in 15 (71.4%) of 21 patients with less advanced disease (groups I to III). Six other patients with advanced disease (groups IV and V) experienced treatment failure and needed salvage treatment by EBR and/or enucleation. The difference between the two patient groups with regard to disease stage was statistically significant (P < .0001). EBR could be avoided in 13 (68.4%) of 19 patients, who presented with groups I to III (15 eyes) and group V (one eye) disease, whereas enucleation could be avoided in only two (40%) of five. CONCLUSION: CT combined with intensive LT is effective in patients with groups I to III Rbl, permitting the avoidance of EBR in the majority of these young children and, thus, reducing the risk of long-term sequelae. This is in contrast with the disappointing results for patients with groups IV and V Rbl, in whom EBR and/or enucleation was needed.