Abstract 4668: Analysis of c-Met protein expression by immunohistochemistry and MET gene copy number in hepatocellular carcinoma
Authors: Ihling Christian , Yoast Sienna , DeNicola Matthew , Straub Josef , Dücker Klaus , Nielson Karsten , Baldocchi Russell A. , Ellison Aaron R. , Yamada Holly 
Published: July 2017

Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) typically occurs in patients with chronic liver disease. Such diseases create a demand for liver regeneration due to injury, which in turn promotes upregulation of c-Met, a receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) involved in wound healing, leading to increased cellular proliferation, survival, and mobilization. c-Met is the product of the proto-oncogene MET, so increased c-Met activity not only effects wound healing but can also contribute to the development and progression of HCC. Aberrant c-Met signaling is associated with rapid tumor growth and aggressively invasive disease in HCC, resulting in poor patient prognosis. We examined c-Met expression and MET gene amplification in 69 procured HCC samples and c-Met expression in adjacent non-tumor tissue.
Methods: c-Met expression was assessed using MET IHC MSC2156119J pharmDx anti-c-MET (clone D1C2) rabbit mAb. c-Met expression was scored semiquantitatively on a scale of 0-3+ based on the staining intensity in ≥50% of cells [Koeppen et al. Proc USCAP 2012 (abstract 2001)]; tumors scoring 2+ or 3+ were judged positive. MET gene copy number (GCN) was assessed using the MET IQFISH Kit-111480 with a probe covering a 269 kb segment on chromosome 7q31.2 containing the MET gene. Tumors were considered to be FISH positive if scored cells had a mean MET/CEN7 ratio ≥2.0 or ≥50% of cells contained ≥5 MET signals.
Results: All cases showed typical HCC morphology and were classified as low to high grade trabecular, pseudoglandular, or solid with common cytoplasmic features. The tumor cells and cells of the adjacent cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic liver tissue (bile duct epithelia, hepatocytes endothelial cells) showed cytoplasmic and membrane staining of varying extent and intensity. c-Met staining in tumor was heterogeneous and present in 68/68 cases. Semiquantitative analysis showed that 11/67 (16%) tumors were c-Met-positive (3+, 3 cases; 2+, 8 cases). Six out of 69 (8.7%) were amplified by ratio and 3 (4.3%) others had ≥5 MET gene copies in ≥50 % of cells, giving an overall frequency of FISH positivity of 13%. Most interestingly, amplification and/or increased gene copy number was homogeneous throughout the tumor in all cases, in contrast to heterogeneous c-Met staining observed in some of the same tumors with IHC. Five of the 11 c-Met-positive (IHC 2+/3+) tumors were MET amplified, and all 3 of the IHC 3+ tumors were amplified. Conversely, 4 of the 9 FISH-positive tumors were c-Met-negative.
Conclusion: These data provide insight into the frequency of c-Met/MET abnormalities in HCC and show there is discordance between c-Met protein expression and MET GCN alterations. This may be of importance for selection of patients with HCC for clinical trials of c-Met inhibitors.
Citation Format: Christian Ihling, Sienna Yoast, Matthew DeNicola, Josef Straub, Klaus Dücker, Karsten Nielson, Russell A. Baldocchi, Aaron R. Ellison, Holly Yamada. Analysis of c-Met protein expression by immunohistochemistry and MET gene copy number in hepatocellular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4668. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4668