Abstract A2-39: Augmented targeted NGS in cancer diagnostics: Comparing gene panels and whole exome sequencing for accurate detection of driver mutations
Authors: Helman Elena , Clark Michael James , Boyle Sean , Chen Richard , Luo Shujun , Haudenschild Christian , Harris Jason , Bartha Gabor , Church Deanna , West John 
Published: November 2015

Abstract
With the advent of next-generation sequencing techniques, tumor mutations that guide therapeutic decisions can be identified on a large scale. The ability to accurately detect these mutations is often impaired by obstacles such as sequencing coverage gaps, small sample amount, low cellularity, and tumor heterogeneity. Two methods commonly used to interrogate the genomic profile of a tumor are: i) cancer gene panels, where a small number of genes (in the range of ~5-500, depending on the specific panel design) is assessed, and ii) cancer exome sequencing, where most human genes are evaluated. Additionally, tumor RNA can be studied to elucidate gene fusions and expression features that may impact treatment. Depending on the goals of the investigator, both methods have certain advantages and disadvantages. Differences between these assays must be clearly understood in order for cancer researchers to make the best decision to achieve their objective.
We developed a set of unique sequencing assays to augment and improve detection of major cancer mutations by enhancing coverage over known sequencing gaps and GC-rich regions. We utilize these protocols to create an accuracy and content enhanced whole-exome (ACE Exome) as well as an extended, augmented cancer gene panel (ACE Extended Cancer Panel), targeting over 1,300 cancer genes and 200 miRNA genes at very high depth. We compared these ACE assays to standard exome and gene panels currently available. We then compared the ACE panel to the ACE exome using a set of well-characterized cancer cell lines, cell line mixtures with known genomic perturbations, and primary tumor and matched normal pairs involved in drug resistance. We also performed whole-transcriptome and targeted RNA sequencing as companion assays to the DNA exome and panel, respectively. All data were analyzed using a cancer bioinformatics pipeline optimized for detection of low-representation small variants and indels, as well as somatic copy-number aberrations, gene expression and fusions.
The ACE assays were able to detect somatic variants with higher accuracy than standard assays across regions targeted by both. For example, a low-representation BRAF mutation detected by standard exome was confirmed as a false positive using the ACE exome due to 90 times more coverage over that region. Between the ACE assays, we found that 88% of somatic variants identified through ACE exome were also identified with our comprehensive panel within regions targeted by both. Conversely, more than half of the somatic variants discovered in the ACE panel were missed in the ACE exome due to insufficient read depth. For instance, the panel detected two EGFR variants known to be present at 1% that were missed in the ACE exome. About 20 times more somatic variants across some ~18,000 genes were detected in whole-exome that are not targeted on the augmented gene panel. These genes have not yet been associated with cancer in current literature, but may be of potential interest for discovery research. Copy number profiles, although more comprehensive in the exome, were recapitulated using the panel, despite large distances between panel targets. Finally, the integration of RNA analysis to the DNA panel was able to detect expression and fusion patterns. In particular, we detected a DNA mutation associated with resistance in a post-treatment specimen, but accompanying RNA data proved this mutant unexpressed and thereby unlikely to be the driver of resistance.
For NGS-based cancer analysis to effectively guide clinical decisions and research, accuracy across all relevant cancer genes is of paramount importance. An enhanced exome may offer a solution for researchers interested in novel cancer associations who desire broad, even coverage. A comprehensive, high-depth panel targeting a large set of genes associated with cancer, accompanied by RNA analysis, may accomplish research goals across a wide range of translational cancer research.
Citation Format: Elena Helman, Michael James Clark, Sean Boyle, Richard Chen, Shujun Luo, Christian Haudenschild, Jason Harris, Gabor Bartha, Deanna Church, John West. Augmented targeted NGS in cancer diagnostics: Comparing gene panels and whole exome sequencing for accurate detection of driver mutations. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Translation of the Cancer Genome; Feb 7-9, 2015; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(22 Suppl 1):Abstract nr A2-39.