Reconstructing the Zama (Mexico) discovery source to sink story, Part I; detrital zircon U–Pb and (U‐Th)/He provenance analysis and implications for sediment source terranes
Authors: Stockli D. F. , Snedden J. W. , Lawton T. F. , Albertson M. , Pasley J. 
Published: September 2024

AbstractThe Zama discovery was identified off the coast of Tabasco, Mexico, in the Sureste Basin of the Gulf of Mexico and is hosted in a three‐way closure in the Upper Miocene. This study conducted a detailed detrital zircon (DZ) U–Pb and (U‐Th)/He provenance analyses on samples from sandstone reservoirs in the Zama‐3 and Zama‐2ST1 wells. A total of 22 sandstone samples (11 from each well) were collected for DZ U–Pb and (U‐Th)/He dating from different reservoir zones, testing the hypothesis that different zones were whether originally derived from varied sedimentary source terranes and associated transport pathways to the Zama mini‐basin depositional site. Additional objectives include determination of maximum depositional ages, reconstruction of paleofluvial systems, and exploring the temporal evolution of the drainage region and hinterland tectonics. The DZ U–Pb age spectra from both Zama wells have remarkably homogenous DZ signatures with very similar DZ age modes and modal percentages, displaying dominant Permian/Chiapas Batholith (ca. 35%–45%), Mesoproterozoic/Oaxaquian (ca. 20%–35%), Early Palaeozoic/Acatlán (ca. 8%–20%), and Cenozoic magmatic arc (ca. 15%–25%) age modes, as well as some subsidiary (<5%) early Proterozoic/Archean and Early Cretaceous DZ age components, linked to recycled lower Palaeozoic strata and the Guerrero Terrane and Alisitos arc, respectively. Despite differences in paleocurrent directions, deduced from image logs, there are no systematic differences in DZ spectra, indicating a consistent sediment provenance and no changes in source area. All Zama samples analysed in the study are characterized by abundant syn‐depositional Late Miocene DZ grains, clustering between 8.6 and 10.2 Ma, corroborating a Tortonian (Late Miocene) depositional age, and yield rapid sediment accumulation rates of ca. 200 m in <1.4 Ma (13 m/Myr). Doubled zircon U–Pb and (U‐Th)/He age pairs are indicative of recycling of early Mesozoic rift strata and Paleogene and younger Chiapas basement. These new DZ U–Pb and (U‐Th)/He data have a nearly invariant Tortonian sediment provenance that is similar to the modern Grijalva River flowing generally northward out of the Chiapas highlands. The paleo‐Grijalva drainage, providing sediment to the Late Miocene Zama mini‐basin, was likely drastically larger than the present catchment as it involved 10 Ma plutonic sources that were subsequently downfaulted along the Pacific coast in the latest Miocene. Importantly, DZ U–Pb age components are consistent with Oaxaquia, early Acatlán, and Guerrero/Alisitos signatures and point to sourcing from the Chortis block during its tectonic eastward translation. Such a scenario would allow for a substantially larger Miocene paleo‐drainage that would have encompassed both Chiapas and portions of Chortis. The Miocene tectonic translation of Chortis and erosion of a large and tectonically active hinterland would also reconcile the dramatically larger Middle to Late Miocene sediment supply, funnelling a large influx of sediment into the southern Gulf of Mexico. Rapid Late Miocene sediment accumulation in the salt‐defined Zama mini‐basin must have involved sustained sediment flux via the paleo‐Grijalva drainage and was likely facilitated and focused by continued salt deflation due to sediment loading, as described in Part II. Thus, our work provides new scientific insights into one of the largest hydrocarbon discoveries in Mexico in recent years.