bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Intentional Weight Loss and Endometrial Cancer Risk
Authors: Luo Juhua , Chlebowski Rowan T. , Hendryx Michael , Rohan Thomas , Wactawski-Wende Jean , Thomson Cynthia A. , Felix Ashley S. , Chen Chu , Barrington Wendy , Coday Mace , Stefanick Marcia , LeBlanc Erin , Margolis Karen L. 
Published: February 2017

Purpose Although obesity is an established endometrial cancer risk factor, information about the influence of weight loss on endometrial cancer risk in postmenopausal women is limited. Therefore, we evaluated associations among weight change by intentionality with endometrial cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) observational study. Patients and Methods Postmenopausal women (N = 36,794) ages 50 to 79 years at WHI enrollment had their body weights measured and body mass indices calculated at baseline and at year 3. Weight change during that period was categorized as follows: stable (change within ± 5%), loss (change ≥ 5%), and gain (change ≥ 5%). Weight loss intentionality was assessed via self-report at year 3; change was characterized as intentional or unintentional. During the subsequent 11.4 years (mean) of follow-up, 566 incident endometrial cancer occurrences were confirmed by medical record review. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate relationships (hazard ratios [HRs] and 95% CIs) between weight change and endometrial cancer incidence. Results In multivariable analyses, compared with women who had stable weight (± 5%), women with weight loss had a significantly lower endometrial cancer risk (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.95). The association was strongest among obese women with intentional weight loss (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.78). Weight gain (≥ 10 pounds) was associated with a higher endometrial cancer risk than was stable weight, especially among women who had never used hormones. Conclusion Intentional weight loss in postmenopausal women is associated with a lower endometrial cancer risk, especially among women with obesity. These findings should motivate programs for weight loss in obese postmenopausal women.
Role of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem-Cell Rescue in Men With Previously Treated Germ Cell Tumors
Authors: Pagliaro Lance C. 
Published: February 2017

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors’ suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 39-year-old, previously healthy man presented with a left testicular mass, confirmed on ultrasound. He underwent left inguinal orchiectomy, which disclosed testicular carcinoma composed of 90% choriocarcinoma, 9% seminoma, and 1% teratoma. Imaging revealed numerous metastases in the lungs, liver, and brain. Prechemotherapy levels of serum tumor markers were alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 2.0 ng/mL, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 151,111 IU/L, and lactate dehydrogenase 588 U/L. He received four courses of etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy, given without bleomycin because of the anticipated need for postchemotherapy thoracic surgery. He had an incomplete response to induction chemotherapy. The serum hCG level was 8.1 IU/L, and there were residual lesions in the liver and lungs whereas the brain metastases had nearly resolved. His Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was zero. He had no symptoms of ototoxicity or peripheral neurotoxicity. Repeat serum hCG levels after chemotherapy were 12.3 IU/L at 2 weeks and 325 IU/L at 4 weeks. He was referred to discuss optimal ongoing treatment.
A Phase II Study of Intermittent Sunitinib in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Authors: Ornstein Moshe C. , Wood Laura S. , Elson Paul , Allman Kimberly D. , Beach Jennifer , Martin Allison , Zanick Beth R. , Grivas Petros , Gilligan Tim , Garcia Jorge A. , Rini Brian I. 
Published: February 2017

Purpose Sunitinib is a standard initial therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but chronic dosing requires balancing toxicity with clinical benefit. The feasibility and clinical outcome with intermittent sunitinib dosing in patients with mRCC was explored. Patients and Methods Patients with treatment-naïve, clear cell mRCC were treated with four cycles of sunitinib (50 mg once per day, 4 weeks of receiving treatment followed by 2 weeks of no treatment). Patients with a ≥ 10% reduction in tumor burden (TB) after four cycles had sunitinib held, with restaging scans performed every two cycles. Sunitinib was reinitiated for two cycles in those patients with an increase in TB by ≥ 10%, and again held with ≥ 10% TB reduction. This intermittent sunitinib dosing continued until Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-defined disease progression while receiving sunitinib, or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary objective was feasibility, defined as the proportion of eligible patients who underwent intermittent therapy. Results Of 37 patients enrolled, 20 were eligible for intermittent therapy and all patients (100%) entered the intermittent phase. Patients were not eligible for intermittent sunitinib because of progressive disease (n = 13), toxicity (n = 1), or consent withdrawal (n = 3) before the end of cycle 4. The objective response rate was 46% after the first four cycles of therapy. The median increase in TB during the periods off sunitinib was 1.6 cm (range, −2.9 to 3.4 cm) compared with the TB immediately before stopping sunitinib. Most patients exhibited a stable sawtooth pattern of TB reduction while receiving sunitinib and TB increase while not receiving sunitinib. Median progression-free survival to date is 22.4 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 37.6 months) and median overall survival is 34.8 months (95% CI, 14.8 months to not applicable). Conclusion Periodic extended sunitinib treatment breaks are feasible and clinical efficacy does not seem to be compromised.
Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Authors: Sepulveda Antonia R. , Hamilton Stanley R. , Allegra Carmen J. , Grody Wayne , Cushman-Vokoun Allison M. , Funkhouser William K. , Kopetz Scott E. , Lieu Christopher , Lindor Noralane M. , Minsky Bruce D. , Monzon Federico A. , Sargent Daniel J. , Singh Veena M. , Willis Joseph , Clark Jennifer , Colasacco Carol , Rumble R. Bryan , Temple-Smolkin Robyn , Ventura Christina B. , Nowak Jan A. 
Published: February 2017

Purpose Molecular testing of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to improve patient care and outcomes of targeted and conventional therapies has been the center of many recent studies, including clinical trials. Evidence-based recommendations for the molecular testing of CRC tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) –targeted therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens are warranted in clinical practice. The purpose of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing for CRC through a systematic review of the literature. Methods The American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), College of American Pathologists (CAP), Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing, guide targeted therapies, and advance personalized care for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included over 4,000 articles was conducted to gather data to inform this guideline. Results Twenty-one guideline statements (eight recommendations, 10 expert consensus opinions and three no recommendations) were established. Recommendations Evidence supports mutational testing for genes in the EGFR signaling pathway, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize molecular testing for predictive and prognostic molecular biomarkers involve selection of assays, type of specimens to be tested, timing of ordering of tests and turnaround time for testing results. Additional information is available at: www.asco.org/CRC-markers-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki
Evidence on Effectiveness of Upper Neck Irradiation Versus Whole Neck Irradiation as Elective Neck Irradiation in Node-Negative Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Authors: Co Jayson L. , Mejia Michael Benedict A. , Dizon Janine Margarita R. 
Published: February 2017

Purpose Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a central tumor with a rich lymphatic network and a propensity for bilateral cervical lymph node metastasis. There is an orderly pattern of lymph node involvement in NPC. There is no current standard for prophylactic neck irradiation in node-negative or limited retropharyngeal (RP) node–positive NPC. This study aims to synthesize the current evidence on upper neck irradiation (UNI) versus whole neck irradiation (WNI) as prophylactic neck irradiation in node-negative or limited RP node–positive NPC. Materials and Methods A search of relevant articles was done from 2000 to October 2015. Critical appraisal and meta-analysis of the eligible studies were undertaken to assess the effectiveness of UNI versus WNI as prophylactic neck irradiation in node-negative or limited involved RP node NPC. Results Only one randomized controlled trial investigated the use of prophylactic UNI versus WNI and showed no confirmed nodal relapse in both arms. Pooled analysis of four retrospective studies showed no significant difference in nodal recurrence, whether in-field or out-of-field recurrence. There was also no significant difference in terms of 5-year distant metastasis–free and overall survival. Conclusion In node-negative or limited RP node–positive NPC, the current evidence shows the possibility of treating only the upper neck (levels II, III, and VA) without compromising nodal control, distant metastasis, and overall survival. As a result of the scarcity of data, more randomized clinical trials are warranted in this subset of patients.
Clinical and Epidemiological Profile of Breast Cancer in Mexico: Results of the Seguro Popular
Authors: Reynoso-Noverón Nancy , Villarreal-Garza Cynthia , Soto-Perez-de-Celis Enrique , Arce-Salinas Claudia , Matus-Santos Juan , Ramírez-Ugalde María Teresa , Alvarado-Miranda Alberto , Cabrera-Galeana Paula , Meneses-García Abelardo , Lara-Medina Fernando , Bargalló-Rocha Enrique , Mohar Alejandro 
Published: February 2017

Purpose One half of the Mexican population lacks comprehensive health care coverage. In 2003, a reform to the General Health Law was approved that led to the creation of the System of Social Protection in Health and made universal health coverage mandatory. The main innovation of this reform was Seguro Popular, which provided coverage for breast cancer. Here we report the outcomes of women with breast cancer treated at a cancer center in Mexico under Seguro Popular. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective cohort study that included all patients with breast cancer treated in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico City between January 2007 and December 2013 with Seguro Popular coverage. Demographic and clinical information were collected and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results A total of 4,300 women with breast cancer were included in this analysis. Most patients had locally advanced disease at diagnosis (53%, n = 2,293), and 13% (n = 558) presented with stage IV disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 1,834 patients (52%), with a pathologic complete response in 25.1% (n = 460). Median follow-up was 40.5 months. Five-year survival for the entire cohort was 82% (95% CI, 81% to 84%). Five-year survival was 97% for early-stage disease (95% CI, 95% to 98%), 82% for locally advanced disease (95% CI, 80% to 84%), and 36% for metastatic disease (95% CI, 30% to 42%). Conclusion This represents the first description of a cohort of patients with breast cancer treated in Mexico under Seguro Popular. Seguro Popular has allowed our institution, and other Mexican centers, to establish efficient standardized mechanisms to treat patients with breast cancer.
Impact of Payer Constraints on Access to Genetic Testing
Authors: Whitworth Pat , Beitsch Peter , Arnell Christopher , Cox Hannah C. , Brown Krystal , Kidd John , Lancaster Johnathan M. 
Published: February 2017

Background: With increased demand for hereditary cancer genetic testing, some large national health-care insurance payers (LNHPs) have implemented policies to minimize inappropriate testing by mandating consultation with a geneticist or genetic counselor (GC). We hypothesized such a restriction would reduce access and appropriate testing. Methods: Test cancellation rates (ie, tests ordered that did not result in a reported test result), mutation-positive rates, and turnaround times for comprehensive BRCA1/2 testing for a study LNHP that implemented a GC-mandate policy were determined over the 12 months before and after policy implementation (excluding a 4-month transition period). Cancellation rates were evaluated based on the reason for cancellation, National Comprehensive Cancer Network testing criteria, and self-identified ancestry. A control LNHP was evaluated over the same period for comparison. Results: The study LNHP cancellation rate increased from 13.3% to 42.1% ( P < .001) after policy implementation. This increase was also observed when only individuals who met National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer testing were considered (9.5% to 37.7%; P < .001). Cancellation rates increased after policy introduction for all ancestries; however, this was more pronounced among individuals of African or Latin American ancestry, for whom cancellation rates rose to 48.9% and 49.6%, respectively, compared with 33.9% for individuals of European ancestry. Over this same time period, control LNHP cancellation rates decreased or stayed the same for all subgroups. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that a GC-mandate policy implemented by a LNHP substantially decreased access to appropriate genetic testing, disproportionately impacting minority populations without any evidence that inappropriate testing was decreased.
Characterizing the Nature of Scan Results Discussions: Insights Into Why Patients Misunderstand Their Prognosis
Authors: Singh Sarguni , Cortez Dagoberto , Maynard Douglas , Cleary James F. , DuBenske Lori , Campbell Toby C. 
Published: February 2017

Introduction: Patients with incurable cancer have poor prognostic awareness. We present a detailed analysis of the dialogue between oncologists and patients in conversations with prognostic implications. Methods: A total of 128 audio-recorded encounters from a large multisite trial were obtained, and 64 involved scan results. We used conversation analysis, a qualitative method for studying human interaction, to analyze typical patterns and conversational devices. Results: Four components consistently occurred in sequential order: symptom-talk, scan-talk, treatment-talk, and logistic-talk. Six of the encounters (19%) were identified as good news, 15 (45%) as stable news, and 12 (36%) as bad news. The visit duration varied by the type of news: good, 15 minutes (07:00-29:00); stable, 17 minutes (07:00-41:00); and bad, 20 minutes (07:00-28:00). Conversational devices were common, appearing in half of recordings. Treatment-talk occupied 50% of bad-news encounters, 31% of good-news encounters, and 19% of stable-news encounters. Scan-talk occupied less than 10% of all conversations. There were only four instances of frank prognosis discussion. Conclusion: Oncologists and patients are complicit in constructing the typical encounter. Oncologists spend little time discussing scan results and the prognostic implications in favor of treatment-related talk. Conversational devices routinely help transition from scan-talk to detailed discussions about treatment options. We observed an opportunity to create prognosis-talk after scan-talk with a new conversational device, the question “Would you like to talk about what this means?” as the oncologist seeks permission to disclose prognostic information while ceding control to the patient.
Choosing Wisely: Opportunities for Improving Value in Cancer Care Delivery?
Authors: Rocque Gabrielle B. , Williams Courtney P. , Jackson Bradford E. , Wallace Audrey S. , Halilova Karina I. , Kenzik Kelly M. , Partridge Edward E. , Pisu Maria 
Published: February 2017

Introduction: Patients, providers, and payers are striving to identify where value in cancer care can be increased. As part of the Choosing Wisely (CW) campaign, ASCO and the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology have recommended against specific, yet commonly performed, treatments and procedures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data to examine concordance with CW recommendations across 12 cancer centers in the southeastern United States. Variability for each measure was evaluated on the basis of patient characteristics and site of care. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine differences in average costs per patient by concordance status. Potential cost savings were estimated on the basis of a potential 95% adherence rate and average cost difference. Results: The analysis included 37,686 patients with cancer with Fee-for-Service Medicare insurance. Concordance varied by CW recommendation from 39% to 94%. Patient characteristics were similar for patients receiving concordant and nonconcordant care. Significant variability was noted across centers for all recommendations, with as much as an 89% difference. Nonconcordance was associated with higher costs for every measure. If concordance were to increase to 95% for all measures, we would estimate a $19 million difference in total cost of care per quarter. Conclusion: These results demonstrate ample room for reduction of low-value care and corresponding costs associated with the CW recommendations. Because variability in concordance was driven primarily by site of care, rather than by patient factors, continued education about these low-value services is needed to improve the value of cancer care.
Do Patients and Oncologists Discuss the Cost of Cancer Treatment? An Observational Study of Clinical Interactions Between African American Patients and Their Oncologists
Authors: Hamel Lauren M. , Penner Louis A. , Eggly Susan , Chapman Robert , Klamerus Justin F. , Simon Michael S. , Stanton Sarah C.E. , Albrecht Terrance L. 
Published: February 2017

Purpose: Financial toxicity negatively affects patients with cancer, especially racial/ethnic minorities. Patient-oncologist discussions about treatment-related costs may reduce financial toxicity by factoring costs into treatment decisions. This study investigated the frequency and nature of cost discussions during clinical interactions between African American patients and oncologists and examined whether cost discussions were affected by patient sociodemographic characteristics and social support, a known buffer to perceived financial stress. Methods Video recorded patient-oncologist clinical interactions (n = 103) from outpatient clinics of two urban cancer hospitals (including a National Cancer Institute–designated comprehensive cancer center) were analyzed. Coders studied the videos for the presence and duration of cost discussions and then determined the initiator, topic, oncologist response to the patient’s concerns, and the patient’s reaction to the oncologist’s response. Results: Cost discussions occurred in 45% of clinical interactions. Patients initiated 63% of discussions; oncologists initiated 36%. The most frequent topics were concern about time off from work for treatment (initiated by patients) and insurance (initiated by oncologists). Younger patients and patients with more perceived social support satisfaction were more likely to discuss cost. Patient age interacted with amount of social support to affect frequency of cost discussions within interactions. Younger patients with more social support had more cost discussions; older patients with more social support had fewer cost discussions. Conclusion: Cost discussions occurred in fewer than one half of the interactions and most commonly focused on the impact of the diagnosis on patients’ opportunity costs rather than treatment costs. Implications for ASCO’s Value Framework and design of interventions to improve cost discussions are discussed.
Performance of a Trigger Tool for Identifying Adverse Events in Oncology
Authors: Lipitz-Snyderman Allison , Classen David , Pfister David , Killen Aileen , Atoria Coral L. , Fortier Elizabeth , Epstein Andrew S. , Anderson Christopher , Weingart Saul N. 
Published: February 2017

Purpose: Although patient safety is a priority in oncology, few tools measure adverse events (AEs) beyond treatment-related toxicities. The study objective was to assemble a set of clinical triggers in the medical record and assess the extent to which triggered events identified AEs. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the performance of an oncology medical record screening tool at a comprehensive cancer center. The study cohort included 400 patients age 18 years or older diagnosed with breast (n = 128), colorectal (n = 136), or lung cancer (n = 136), observed as in- and outpatients for up to 1 year. Results: We identified 790 triggers, or 1.98 triggers per patient (range, zero to 18 triggers). Three hundred four unique AEs were identified from medical record reviews and existing AE databases. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of the original tool was 0.40 for total AEs and 0.15 for preventable or mitigable AEs. Examples of high-performing triggers included return to the operating room or interventional radiology within 30 days of surgery (PPV, 0.88 and 0.38 for total and preventable or mitigable AEs, respectively) and elevated blood glucose (> 250 mg/dL; PPV, 0.47 and 0.40 for total and preventable or mitigable AEs, respectively). The final modified tool included 49 triggers, with an overall PPV of 0.48 for total AEs and 0.18 for preventable or mitigable AEs. Conclusion: A valid medical record screening tool for AEs in oncology could offer a powerful new method for measuring and improving cancer care quality. Future improvements could optimize the tool’s efficiency and create automated electronic triggers for use in real-time AE detection and mitigation algorithms.