bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Effects of dexamethasone on the EC50 of remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine achieving analgesia during pancreatic extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: a prospective, randomized and controlled study
Authors: Guo Yu , Lu Jun , Li Bo , Wang Chang-Li , Wang Jia-Feng , Deng Xiao-Ming 
Published: October 2024

Abstract
Background
In addition to their classic genomic effects, glucocorticoids also manifest rapid non genomic effects. We speculate that dexamethasone has the potential prompt onset of analgesic effects. The objective of this study is to investigate the influence of a single preoperative dose of dexamethasone on the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of remifentanil when combined with dexmedetomidine for pain relief during pancreatic extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (P-ESWL).

Methods
A total of 60 patients undergoing P-ESWL were enrolled and randomized at 1:1 ratio into the dexamethasone (DXM) group and the placebo group. Before anesthesia induction, patients in DXM group received an intravenous injection of 8 mg dexamethasone, while subjects in placebo group received an equal dose of physiological saline. Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) was performed based on remifentanil in combination with dexmedetomidine. Remifentanil was administered by TCI with an initial target concentration of 2.5 µg/mL for both groups. A positive response was defined as that VAS score > 3 by the patient at any time during the procedure. Subsequent target concentrations were adjusted by Dixon up-down sequential method, where dose modifications were performed by 0.3 ng/mL intervals, based on the response of the previous patient. The EC50 of remifentanil for pain relief during P-ESWL treatment was calculated using Dixon’s up-and-down method. Hemodynamic variables, oxygen saturation and adverse events were also recorded.

Results
Dixon up-and-down method revealed that the EC50 of remifentanil was significantly higher in placebo group (2.65 ± 0.28 ng/mL) than in DXM group (2.02 ± 0.23 ng/ml) (P < 0.001). Hemodynamic parameter exhibited a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) before and after induction in placebo group; however, data of the two groups were comparable (P>0.05). Less adverse events occurred in DXM group, including the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and analgesia requirement with in the first 24 h following the procedure at ward.

Conclusion
Dexamethasone exerted analgesic effects with a rapid onset, and patients received dexamethasone 8 mg preoperative had a lower required EC50 of remifentanil during P-ESWL. It is also associated with reduced PONV in addition to reduced postoperative analgesic consumption in the first postoperative 24 h.

Trial registration
Registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300078171) on 30/11/2023.
The distinct functional brain network and its association with psychotic symptom severity in men with methamphetamine-associated psychosis
Authors: Hwang Zhen-An , Hsu Ai-Ling , Li Chia-Wei , Wu Changwei W. , Chen Chun-Hsin , Chan Wing P. , Huang Ming-Chyi 
Published: October 2024

Abstract
Background
Individuals using methamphetamine (METH) may experience psychosis, which usually requires aggressive treatment. Studies of the neural correlates of METH-associated psychosis (MAP) have focused predominantly on the default mode network (DMN) and cognitive control networks. We hypothesize that METH use alters global functional connections in resting-state brain networks and that certain cross-network connections could be associated with psychosis.

Methods
We recruited 24 healthy controls (CRL) and 54 men with METH use disorder (MUD) who were then divided into 25 without psychosis (MNP) and 29 with MAP. Psychotic symptom severity was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), evaluating (1) large-scale alterations in regional-wise resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) across 11 brain networks and (2) associations between rsFC and psychotic symptom severity.

Results
The MUD group exhibited greater rsFC between the salience network (SN)-DMN, and subcortical network (SCN)-DMN compared to the CRL group. The MAP group exhibited decreased rsFC in the sensory/somatomotor network (SMN)-dorsal attention network (DAN), SMN-ventral attention network (VAN), SMN-SN, and SMN-auditory network (AN), whereas the MNP group exhibited increased rsFC in the SMN-DMN and the frontoparietal network (FPN)-DMN compared to CRL. Additionally, the MAP group exhibited decreased rsFC strength between the SMN-DMN, SMN-AN, SMN-FPN, and DMN-VAN compared to the MNP group. Furthermore, across the entire MUD group, the PANSS-Positive subscale was negatively correlated with the DMN-FPN and FPN-SMN, while the PANSS-Negative subscale was negatively correlated with the DMN-AN and SMN-SMN.

Conclusion
MUD is associated with altered global functional connectivity. In addition, the MAP group exhibits a different brain functional network compared to the MNP group.
Mandibular second molar impaction: introducing a novel and validated 3D classification system
Authors: Barone Selene , Cevidanes Lucia , Bocchino Tecla , Michelotti Ambra , Borelli Massimo , Giudice Amerigo 
Published: October 2024

Abstract
Background
Mandibular second molar (M2M) impaction is a clinically significant manifestation of eruption disturbance in dental development. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the three-dimensional (3D) characterization on clinical and therapeutic decisions for M2M impaction. The secondary aim was to introduce a validated 3D classification system incorporating both surgical and orthodontic parameters.

Methods
Bidimensional (2D) and 3D radiological records of 15 impacted M2M were collected and deidentified. Ten experienced clinicians (5 oral surgeons;5 orthodontists) categorized each case, first based on 2D records and then with 3D scans. The degree of orthodontic and surgical difficulty in treating impacted M2M was evaluated using a novel classification system based on anatomical and radiological features. The primary outcome variable was the assessment of differences in diagnosis and decision-making protocol using 2D or 3D records, where clinical relevance ranged from 0 to 4. The secondary outcome variable was the validation analysis of the proposed 3D classification system to determine the concordance among the clinicians. Descriptive statistics and multivariable inferential analysis based on Akaike information criterion (AIC) were performed (α = 0.05).

Results
3D examination allowed a better visualization of M2M impaction with higher clinical relevance for diagnosis of M2M root relationship to alveolar nerve and lingual plate, height to alveolar crest, depth, and inclination relative to the first molar and position relative to the third molar (range:2.69–3.43). The proposed 3D classification of M2M impaction changed clinical decisions regarding surgical-orthodontic approach, biomechanics, patient education, and treatment time estimate (range:2.59–3.33). In the validation analysis of the classification, no evidence of inter- or intra-group (surgeon/orthodontist) bias in score attribution occurred: the model with the minimum AIC was the null model (AIC = 718.04).

Conclusion
3D evaluation of impacted M2Ms could enhance diagnostic accuracy, and a classification system was proposed and validated by a group of experienced surgeons and orthodontists with high concordance.
Healthcare professionals’ experiences of providing palliative care for patients with diabetes – a qualitative study
Authors: Seim Signe , Monsen Ragnhild Elisabeth , Kolltveit Beate-Christin Hope , Graue Marit 
Published: October 2024

Abstract
Background
At present, there are no specific guidelines for the treatment of diabetes in palliative care in Norway. The aim of this study was therefore to explore healthcare professionals’ experiences of providing palliative care to individuals with diabetes in specialist as well as primary care settings.

Methods
We interviewed 12 healthcare professionals from two palliative care units in specialist healthcare, one hospice unit in a nursing home, and one dietary care unit providing counselling in the municipality in the eastern part of Norway. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

Results
Our analysis generated three main themes: 1) “Quality of life is the main focus”, which showed that the healthcare professionals’ main focus was on comforting patients through engagement and communication; 2) “An individualized approach”, emphasizing that the treatment was tailored to the unique circumstances of each individual and considered factors such as life expectancy, difficult blood glucose control, and multidisciplinary collaboration, and 3) “Diabetes in the background”, which highlighted that they had a modest focus on diabetes. Diabetes was seen as another aspect of health that they had to be aware of, but their limited knowledge of diabetes guidelines, technical tools, and treatment choices underscored that attentiveness to the diabetes treatment was not prominent.

Conclusion
The findings show that a lack of guidelines allowed for diverse approaches to the treatment of patients with diabetes in palliative care. Attentiveness to diabetes was based on the individual healthcare professionals’ experience and expertise, professional views, and the circumstances of each individual.
Co-designing an interprofessional digital education resource on delirium: a student-led approach
Authors: Wilson Christine Brown , Anderson Tara , Graham Margaret , Murphy Jill , Mitchell Gary , Tuohy Dympna , Barry Heather E. , Boland Pauline , Birch Matt , Tierney Audrey , Stark Patrick , McCurtin Arlene , Creighton Laura , Henderson Elizabeth , Craig Stephanie , McConnell Hannah , Guttridge Heather , Cook Lana , Cunningham Emma , Curran Geoffrey M. , Coffey Alice 
Published: October 2024

Abstract
Background
Interprofessional education is crucial for healthcare students to develop collaborative skills and provide effective patient care. However, opportunities for interprofessional learning are often limited in healthcare curricula. The present study aimed to engage students from different health professions in co-designing an educational resource on delirium recognition and management through an interprofessional lens and explore their experiences of this process.

Methods
Two co-design workshops were conducted with students from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and occupational therapy programmes at two universities across the island of Ireland. Focus groups were held following these workshops to explore students’ experiences of the co-design process. The workshops involved a range of activities, including theme generation, scenario development, resource creation (podcasts, simulations), and focus group discussions. Data from focus groups were analysed thematically.

Results
A total of 19 students participated across the two workshops. Three themes were identified: (1) Relationship development, where students identified the benefits of co-creating the resource and valued the flexibility, collaboration, and social aspects of the co-design approach; (2) Interprofessional collaboration, which challenged students’ assumptions about other disciplines, fostered teamwork and communication, and highlighted the need for early and continuous interprofessional learning; (3) Professional growth, with students reporting increased confidence in managing delirium, working with other professions, and engaging in novel experiences like podcasting and simulation.

Conclusions
The co-design process facilitated interprofessional collaboration, peer learning, and personal growth among healthcare students. Students appreciated the opportunity to co-create an educational resource while developing interprofessional skills. The study demonstrates the potential of co-design as a methodology for enhancing interprofessional education and promoting effective teamwork in healthcare.
An educational intervention study on mandatory reporting of intimate partner violence: changes in knowledge and attitudes among healthcare providers
Authors: Brevik Thea Beate , Laake Petter , Bjørkly Stål , Leer-Salvesen Kjartan , Vatnar Solveig Karin Bø 
Published: October 2024

Abstract
Background
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major public health concern. Healthcare providers can play a crucial role in reporting cases of IPV or suspected IPV injuries to the police or the criminal justice system, commonly referred to as mandatory reporting. However, mandatory reporting of intimate partner violence (MR-IPV) is a debated topic that can pose complex challenges for healthcare providers. This underscores the importance of training programs to ensure that healthcare providers can fulfill their MR-IPV obligations.

Methods
We developed an educational intervention on MR-IPV and assessed its impact on healthcare providers’ knowledge and attitudes. The study used a pre- and post-test design with three measurement points: baseline (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and six months later (T2). The intervention was conducted at a university college in Norway, with data collected between October 2022 and May 2023. The intervention was delivered to 37 healthcare providers who were currently part-time students in mental healthcare. Changes in knowledge and attitudes between T0 and T1, and T0 and T2 were analyzed through nonparametric tests on related samples using the Marginal homogeneity (Stuart–Maxwell) test. Risk differences (RD), along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated for selected categories.

Results
The number of participants knowing the MR law increased from 2.9% at baseline to 62.9% at T1 (RD = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41—0.79) and to 31.4% at T2 (RD = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11–0.46). The number of participants reporting knowing relevant criteria increased from 0.0% at baseline to 68.6% at T1 (RD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50–0.87) and to 34.3% at T2 (RD = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16—0.53). We observed several persistent changes in healthcare providers' attitudes towards MR, including finding MR to be a useful instrument and generally complying with MR requirements.

Conclusions
The findings suggest that this educational intervention can have a positive impact on healthcare providers' attitudes and compliance with MR-IPV. Before the intervention, few participants reported knowing the MR law and its application criteria, demonstrating the importance of continuous learning and evidence-based training programs.
The juggling act of pharmacists in Sweden: a qualitative study on balancing healthcare professionalism and retail employment
Authors: Hagsten Kenneth , Eriksson Andrea , Svensson Ingrid , Palm Kristina 
Published: October 2024

Abstract
Background
Community pharmacies in Sweden merge a state-funded professional community service with a retail business. While previous research has recognized its challenges, less attention has been paid to the potential conflict of interest it could result in regarding the work of pharmacists. This study aims to increase understanding of how pharmacists in Sweden combine their healthcare ambitions and obligations with those concerning being employees in a retail business.

Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 pharmacists employed by pharmacy chains in Sweden. The data were thematically analysed.

Results
In the analysis, three themes were formulated: Different interests, The conflict between professional work & business work, and Strategies to manage the conflicts. The analysis of the data reveals that pharmacists in Sweden experience a conflict of interest. They grapple with balancing being healthcare professionals with a focus on patient care and being valued retail employees that also focus on financial results. This conflict manifests in various situations, such as time management, communication focus, preferred behaviours, and different tasks. The different strategies applied by individual pharmacists to manage the work are results of job crafting. Pharmacists employ strategies such as compromise, mandate stretching, avoidance, and acceptance to manage the conflict. However, these strategies lead to compromises in their work.

Conclusion
This study aimed to understand how pharmacists combine their healthcare ambitions and obligations with those of being employees in a retail business. The study demonstrated that Swedish community pharmacists need to perform a juggling act to be both professional healthcare workers and viewed as valuable retail employees. In situations when the conflict of interest occurs, the pharmacists use different strategies when determining how to prioritize between the professional work and the business work. The conflict of interest in the pharmacists’ work need to be taken into consideration when discussing pharmacists practices, the profession, or role it’s in the healthcare system.
Translating restrictive law into practice: An ethnographic exploration of the systemic processing of legally restricted health care access for asylum seekers in Germany
Authors: Ziegler Sandra , Bozorgmehr Kayvan 
Published: October 2024

Abstract
Background
Access to health services for asylum seekers is legally restricted in Germany. The law is subject to interpretation, therefore the chance of receiving care is not equally distributed among asylum seekers. What services are provided to whom is ultimately decided by health professionals and government employees. The respective prioritization processes and criteria are not transparent. We sought to understand how legal restrictions are translated into daily practices and how this affects the health system. We aimed to outline the complex process of cost coverage for health services for asylum seekers and provide insights into common decision-making criteria.

Methods
We conducted an ethnographic exploration of routines in two outpatient clinics in two federal states over the course of three months, doing participant and non-participant observation. Additionally, we interviewed 21 professionals of health care and government organizations, and documented 110 applications for cost coverage of medical services and their outcome. In addition to qualitative data analysis and documentation, we apply a system-theoretical perspective to our findings.

Results
To perform legal restrictions a cross-sectoral prioritization process of medical services has been implemented, involving health care and government institutions. This changes professional practices, responsibilities and (power) relations. Involved actors find themselves at the intersection of several, oftentimes conflicting priorities, since “doing it right” might be seen differently from a legal, medical, economic, or political perspective. The system-theoretical analysis reveals that while actors have to bring different rationales into workable arrangements this part of the medical system transforms, giving rise to a sub-system that incorporates migration political rationales.

Conclusions
Health care restrictions for asylum seekers are implemented through an organizational linking of care provision and government administration, resulting in a bureaucratization of practice. Power structures at this intersection of health and migration policy, that are uncommon in other parts of the health system are thereby normalized. Outpatient clinics provide low-threshold access to health services, but paradoxically they may unintentionally stabilize health inequities, if prioritization criteria and power dynamics are not made transparent. Health professionals should openly reflect on conflicting rationales. Training, research and professional associations need to empower them to stay true to professional ethical principles and international conventions.
Patients with low prognosis in ART: a Delphi consensus to identify potential clinical implications and measure the impact of POSEIDON criteria
Authors: Alviggi Carlo , Humaidan Peter , Fischer Robert , Conforti Alessandro , Dahan Michael H. , Marca Antonio La , Orvieto Raoul , Polyzos Nikolaos P. , Roque Matheus , Sunkara Sesh K. , Ubaldi Filippo Maria , Vuong Lan , Yarali Hakan , D’Hooghe Thomas , Longobardi Salvatore , Esteves Sandro C. 
Published: October 2024

Abstract
Background
Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal management of women with low prognosis in ART. In this Delphi consensus, a panel of international experts provided real-world clinical perspectives on a series of literature-supported consensus statements regarding the overall relevance of the POSEIDON criteria for women with low prognosis in ART.

Methods
Using a Delphi-consensus framework, twelve experts plus two Scientific Coordinators discussed and amended statements and supporting references proposed by the Scientific Coordinators (Round 1). Statements were distributed via an online survey to an extended panel of 53 experts, of whom 36 who voted anonymously on their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement using a six-point Likert-type scale (1 = Absolutely agree; 2 = More than agree; 3 = Agree; 4 = Disagree; 5 = More than disagree; 6 = Absolutely disagree) (Round 2). Consensus was reached if > 66% of participants agreed or disagreed.

Results
The extended panel voted on seventeen statements and subcategorized them according to relevance. All but one statement reached consensus during the first round; the remaining statement reached consensus after rewording. Statements were categorized according to impact, low-prognosis validation, outcomes and patient management. The POSEIDON criteria are timely and clinically sound. The preferred success measure is cumulative live birth and key management strategies include the use of recombinant FSH preparations, supplementation with r-hLH, dose increases and oocyte/embryo accumulation through vitrification. Tools such as the ART Calculator and Follicle-to-Oocyte Index may be considered. Validation data from large, prospective studies in each POSEIDON group are now needed to corroborate existing retrospective data.

Conclusions
This Delphi consensus provides an overview of expert opinion on the clinical implications of the POSEIDON criteria for women with low prognosis to ovarian stimulation.