bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
OP68 An Evidence-Based Clinical Pathways Program Reduces Low-Value Care
Authors: Mull Nikhil , Leas Brian , Mitchell Matthew , Lavenberg Julia , Patel Neha , Williams Austin , Umscheid Craig 
Published: January 2018

INTRODUCTION:Misdiagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria as catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) leads to unnecessary tests and other low-value care. We used this topic as the prototype to develop a clinical pathways program to promote evidence-based decision making in a multi-hospital system.METHODS:We convened a task force including hospital and critical care physicians, nurses, laboratory staff, and informatics specialists. Our Health Technology Asessment (HTA) center completed a rapid systematic review on guidelines and algorithms for diagnosing CAUTI. Additional rapid reviews were completed as necessary to address specific follow-up questions. A draft pathway based on the guidelines was developed, and then the task force edited it in an iterative process.We used the Dorsata platform (Dorsata Inc., Washington, DC) to create, distribute and maintain the pathway. Dorsata has both desktop and mobile interfaces that guide clinicians through decision algorithms. Individual pathways include links to references and a portal for direct user feedback. Pathway owners have access to a real-time pathway utilization dashboard.A standardized order set with the pathway was added to our electronic health record system. We also held educational meetings for residents and provided “huddle sheets” to nurse educators at each hospital. Posters and computer screen savers were also used to raise awareness of the new pathway.RESULTS:We now have a total of 111 pathways on Dorsata, developed following the same model as the CAUTI evaluation pathway. Some topics, like breast cancer, have as many as sixteen pathways, addressing different clinical questions like first- and second-line therapy. Over 600 individuals have registered for the mobile app, including attending and resident physicians, nurses, and medical students. The pathway site had 1,619 views in December 2016, the most recent month for which complete records are available. The pathways are proving to have an effect on clinical decision making. For example, the annualized number of unnecessary urine cultures avoided as a result of the pathway is 4,474; resulting in estimated direct cost savings of USD67,110.CONCLUSIONS:Using pathways to present HTA information at the point of care is feasible and can improve the value of care.
OP85 Value To Society Of A Nationwide Patient Blood Management Program
Authors: Brilhante Dialina , Nunes António Robalo , Fonseca Cândida , Mairos João , Félix Jorge , Gonçalves Mafalda , Mota Melina , Ferreira Diana , Ferreira César , Andreozzi Valeska , Vandewalle Björn , Rabiais Sara 
Published: January 2018

INTRODUCTION:Patient Blood Management (PBM) describes a multidisciplinary approach that strives to optimize patients own blood and has been reported to reduce blood components utilization while achieving improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the public health and economic impact related to the implementation of a nationwide PBM program in Portugal.METHODS:A decision-model comparing two scenarios (“current clinical practice” and “with PBM implementation”) was used to estimate the PBM impact including hospital-assisted patients from the following therapeutic areas: surgery (orthopaedic, cardiac and urologic), cardiology, oncology, gastrointestinal bleeding, abnormal uterine bleeding, hemodialysis, inflammatory bowel disease and pregnancy. Model inputs were obtained from Portuguese national health databases and literature review. The public health impact was measured in life years (LY) gained, disability-adjusted life years (DALY) reduction, hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission rate reduction. The economic value was expressed in total and hospitalization costs savings.RESULTS:A total of 384,704 patients were eligible for PBM strategies. We estimated that a one year nationwide PBM implementation could avoid 594 premature deaths, representing a gain of 1,481 LY and a reduction of 3,660 DALYs relative to the current paradigm. An 8.4 percent and 37.3 percent reduction in length of stay and 30-day readmission rate are expected, respectively. This corresponds to EUR70.4 million savings in hospitalization costs. Although PBM closer monitoring would imply additional physician visits and medicines use, leading to EUR24.1 million in additional expenditure, in this population the overall PBM implementation can generate net savings of more than EUR67.7 million per year (6.3 percent reduction of public expenditure).CONCLUSIONS:The implementation of a nationwide PBM in Portugal may represent a great public health impact, especially in decreased mortality and disability, with substantial public expenditure reduction.
OP91 Health Technology Assessment On The Da Vinci Surgical System Using Real World Data In China
Authors: Qiu Yingpeng , Xiao Yue , Zhao Kun , Shi Liwei , Sui Binyan 
Published: January 2018

INTRODUCTION:The Da Vinci surgical system is classified as a type “A” medical device in China; the procurement plan of which is regulated by the National Health and Family Planning Commission (NHFP). Between 2010 to 2015, there were thirty-four Da Vinci surgical robots purchased, and installed in thirty tertiary public hospitals across the country. In order to generate context-specific evidence and support further capital funding decisions, the NHFP commissioned a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) of Da Vinci surgical robots, with a focus on real use of the technology in those tertiary public hospitals.METHODS:Nine hospitals were selected to collect real word data between 2013 to 2015. Using a cross-sectional survey, data of all robotic surgical cases were collected and described. The unit costs of the robotic surgery were estimated from activity based costing. We also collected cases of prostatectomy (427 versus 421) and hysterectomy (247 versus 105) using the robotic system and laparoscope respectively, and then compared hospital fees and effectiveness during hospitalization. Simulation of the budget impact on health insurance in Shanghai City over the next 5 years was also performed.RESULTS:A full HTA was conducted based on real data from nine public hospitals in the central and eastern region. Based on a systematic review methodology, we appraised evidence on safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Da Vinci surgical robot. Data on technology use, clinical management, and pricing and payment were collected through a cross-sectional survey and interviews of hospital managers, surgeons and nurses. We designed a cohort study on cost-effectiveness of Da Vinci-assisted prostatectomy and hysterectomy, comparing Da Vinci-assisted and laparoscopic prostatectomy (427 vs 421) and Da Vinci-assisted and laparoscopic hysterectomy (247 versus 105). Ethics and inequity issues were discussed based on patient interviews. A budget impact analysis was performed based on scenario mapping of promoting Da Vinci-assisted prostatectomy in Shanghai City over a 5-year timeline.CONCLUSIONS:Due to a lack of evidence on long-term clinical effectiveness and high impact on public finances, the Da Vinci robotic robot should not be procured in large numbers in China. For equipment purchasing the government should strengthen regulations and require the public hospitals to collect more evidence.
OP104 Health Technology Assessment's Ethical Evaluation: Understanding The Diversity Of Approaches
Authors: Patenaude Johane , Legault Georges-Auguste , Parent Monelle , Béland Jean-Pierre , Bédard Suzanne Kocsis , Bellemare Christian , Bernier Louise , Daniel Charles-Etienne , Dagenais Pierre , Gagnon Hubert 
Published: January 2018

INTRODUCTION:The main difficulties encountered in the integration of ethics in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) were identified in our systematic review. In the process of analyzing these difficulties we then addressed the question of the diversity of ethical approaches (1) and the difficulties in their operationalization (2,3).METHODS:Nine ethical approaches were identified: principlism, casuistry, coherence analysis, wide reflexive equilibrium, axiology, socratic approach, triangular method, constructive technology assessment and social shaping of technology. Three criteria were used to clarify the nature of each of these approaches:
1.The characteristics of the ethical evaluation2.The disciplinary foundation of the ethical evaluation3.The operational process of the ethical evaluation in HTA analysis.RESULTS:In HTA, both norm-based ethics and value-based ethics are mobilized. This duality is fundamental since it proposes two different ethical evaluations: the first is based on the conformity to a norm, whereas the second rests on the actualization of values. The disciplinary foundation generates diversity as philosophy, sociology and theology propose different justifications for ethical evaluation. At the operational level, ethical evaluation's characteristics are applied to the case at stake by specific practical reasoning. In a norm-based practical reasoning, one must substantiate the facts that will be correlated to a moral norm for clearly identifying conformity or non-conformity. In value-based practical reasoning, one must identify the impacts of the object of assessment that will be subject to ethical evaluation. Two difficulties arise: how to apply values to facts and prioritize amongst conflicting ethical evaluations of the impacts?CONCLUSIONS:Applying these three criteria to ethical approaches in HTA helps understanding their complexity and the difficulty of operationalizing them in HTA tools. The choice of any ethical evaluations is never neutral; it must be justified by a moral point of view. Developing tools for ethics in HTA is operationalizing a specific practical reasoning in ethics.
OP126 The European Network For Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Template To Aid Health Technology Assessment-based Decisions
Authors: Ballini Luciana , Bonvicini Laura , Rossi Paolo Giorgi , Vicentini Massimo 
Published: January 2018

INTRODUCTION:Health professionals often advocate and request innovative health technologies, perceiving Health Technology Assessment (HTA) as a delay or counterargument to their requests. To facilitate engagement of professionals and decision makers in the HTA process and endorsement of process outputs, a system for technology requests submission, based on the European Network for HTA (EUnetHTA) Submission Template, was established and subsequently piloted in a cancer research institute.METHODS:The “EUnetHTA medical devices evidence submission template” for companies (1) was adapted for use by professionals proposing a health technology for acquisition. Adaptation consisted mainly in: re-arrangement of chapters order with emphasis on the health problem, unmet needs, claimed additional benefits of the technology and potential for research; inclusion of information on costs/financial resources; and inclusion of a summary with a pre-defined set of brief statements to inform appraisal. The headings for the nine one-paragraph statements were: relevance of the health problem; degree of innovativeness of the technology; potential clinical impact; potential research relevance; comparative safety and effectiveness; economic impact; organizational impact; availability/quality of scientific literature; and degree of diffusion. Decision makers discussed the appraisal's statements with the proponents before reaching a conclusion.RESULTS:From January 2016 technology requests were examined only if presented through the submission template. Results from submissions of three innovative technologies for prostate cancer treatment, endovascular procedures and cataract surgery will be discussed. Acceptability of the submission template was high and professionals — supported by experts available in their institution (clinical engineers, epidemiologists and others) — were successful in completing the dossier. Decision-makers appraisal proved facilitated and transparent. Concerted decisions were taken within a few weeks from submission.CONCLUSIONS:The EUnetHTA tool proved flexible and valuable to initiate an HTA-based decision-making process. Appraisal was cooperative and proponents were involved in the decisions, through a process requiring a mean total time of 6 months. Participants’ misgivings were overcome by transparency and objectivity of the process.
OP129 Predictors Of Effectiveness In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Authors: dos Santos Jéssica , Oliveira Haliton , da Silva Francisco Acurcio Michael , Almeida Alessandra , Rodrigues Flávia , Guerra Augusto , Bennie Marion , Godman Brian , Alvares Juliana 
Published: January 2018

INTRODUCTION:Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have become firmly established in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but some patients do not improve despite therapy. This study evaluated the predictors of effectiveness of the bDMARDs on a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Brazilian Public Health System.METHODS:RA individuals treated with bDMARDs, were included in the open prospective cohort study. The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was used to assess the effectiveness comparing results at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up. The association between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics with the disease activity measured by the CDAI was also investigated. The bDMARDs was considered effective when the patient achieved remission or low disease activity and considered not effective when there was still moderate or high disease activity. Pearson's chi-square was applied for the univariate analysis to evaluate the association of effectiveness measured by the CDAI with the socio-demographic (gender, education, marital status and race) and clinical variables (type of drug, EuroQol (EQ)-5D and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)). Logistic regression was applied in the multivariate analysis of the variables that presented a p< .20 value during the univariate analysis.RESULTS:All 266 RA patients completed six months of follow-up. The most widely used bDMARDs was adalimumab (57.1 percent), with etanercept used by 22.2 percent, golimumab by 7.5 percent, abatacept by 4.5 percent, tocilizumab by 3.4 percent, infliximab by 2.6 percent, certolizumab by 1.5 percent, and rituximab by 1.1 percent. The bDMARDs reduced disease activity as measured by CDAI at six months of follow-up (p<.001). The percentage of patients achieving remission or low disease activity was 40.6 percent. bDMARDs were more effective in patients with better functionality (Odds Ratio, OR = 2.140 / 95 percent Confidence Interval, CI 1.219 - 3.756) at beginning of treatment and in patients who not had a previous bDMARDs (OR = 2.150 / 95 percent CI 1.144 - 4.042).CONCLUSIONS:In this real-world study, functionality and use of previous bDMARDs are predictors in patients with RA treated with bDMARDs.
PP001 Ultrasound To Guide Treatment Decisions In Rheumatoid Arthritis
Authors: Simpson E , Stevenson Matt , Hock Emma , Wong Ruth , Wakefield R , Conaghan P , Estrach C , Edwards C 
Published: January 2018

INTRODUCTION:Ultrasound (US) detects synovitis more accurately than clinical examination (CE) in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This review aimed to investigate the use of US, compared to CE alone, in treatment strategies for RA, and to estimate its potential to be cost-effective in making treatment decisions.METHODS:A systematic review was conducted of studies: investigating RA treatment response or strategies that compared US with CE-assessed synovitis; and of tapering RA treatment (1). A model was constructed to investigate the potential cost-effectiveness of US in (i) selecting patients suitable for treatment tapering; and (ii) avoiding treatment escalation (2).RESULTS:Seven prospective cohort studies suggested US-detected synovitis was significantly associated with a treatment response or tapering failure, whereas in most cases clinical examination alone was not. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified suggested that US added to the Disease Activity Index (DAS)-based treatment strategies but did not significantly improve primary outcomes, but was associated with improved rate of DAS remission. The evidence showed that some patients (proportions varied widely) who had achieved low disease activity could have treatment tapered, with no, or little, short-term harm to the patient.The model estimated that an average reduction of 2.5 percent in the costs of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARDs) was sufficient to cover the costs of performing US every three months. This value increased to 4 percent and 13 percent for the costs of conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (cDMARDs) depending on the assumed regimen.CONCLUSIONS:Use of US to monitor synovitis could potentially be a cost-effective approach, given that low proportions of patients for whom clinicians consider amending treatment, would need to taper treatment, or remain on therapy without escalation. US could provide clinicians with more confidence in reducing the drug burden. However, there is considerable uncertainty in this conclusion due to lack of robust data relating to key parameters.
PP008 Health Technology Assessment Analysis Of New Biological Drugs In Chronic Inflammatory Diseases
Authors: Ferrara Francesco 
Published: January 2018

INTRODUCTION:Innovative therapies with high cost are increasing in every therapeutic area, making it increasingly difficult the role of the pharmacist in trying to rationalize the economic resources to satisfy the needs of the entire population. The analysis of therapeutic appropriateness has a key role in the management of chronic inflammatory diseases where the biological drugs are used by patients for a long period of time. With increasing competition among companies and the advent of the first biosimilar drugs, the costs are declining and the duty of the Pharmacist is the supervision of treatments so that there is a good cost / effectiveness in an attempt to free resources and safeguard the survival of the Health Service National.METHODS:In the year 2015 up to September 2016, all patients were monitored in the departments of Rheumatology, Gastroenterology and Dermatology based on the type of disease, drugs, route of administration and dosages. We evaluated the previous non-biological treatments of first line, therapeutic switch between any drugs with different mechanisms of action, the analysis on the state of the disease, any therapeutic dosages not reported in Summary of Product Characteristics and the reasons that lead the doctors to deviate from guidelines.RESULTS:The treatments of 684 patients were analyzed: 409 in Rheumatology, 212 in Gastroenterology and 63 in Dermatology. The most frequently used drugs are those that have major use in clinical practice: Adalimumab, Etanercept and Infliximab (three anti-TNF alpha drugs). The first two, having a subcutaneous administration compared to intravenous administration, allow greater patient compliance and are therefore preferred to Infliximab. In Rheumatology the use of newer drugs with different mechanisms of action by inhibition of TNF alpha is not negligible and this is an indication of poor accuracy in the application of the guidelines.CONCLUSIONS:Biologicals are well tolerated and improve the quality of life of people with highly disabling diseases. The therapeutic appropriateness and adherence to guidelines are the only way to try to contain costs. The hope is that, in this new year 2017, new biosimilar drugs are approved that would make, at least for the naïve subjects, more sustainable management of these diseases.
PP011 Covering New Medical Devices With Low Cost-Effectiveness Evidence
Authors: Cho Su-Jin , Ko Jung Ae , Seb Lee Yo , Yun Eun Ji , Ha Rang Kyoung 
Published: January 2018

INTRODUCTION:The Korea National Health Insurance (K-NHI) has covered medical devices with low cost-effectiveness evidence by what is known as the Selective Benefit (SB) since December of 2013 as a type of conditional coverage. Most medical devices in the SB category are new technology and have higher levels of clinical effectiveness and/or functions than those in the benefit category, but they are characterized as being expensive. We compare the K-NHI medical device coverage system to those in Japan and Taiwan so as to be more informed about how to cover and set prices for new medical devices.METHODS:We searched for materials related to medical device coverage or the reimbursement systems of three countries (Korea, Japan, and Taiwan). National health insurance laws, policy reports, and the websites of the Ministries of Health of the respective countries, for instance, were also reviewed.RESULTS:The NHI systems of Korea, Japan, and Taiwan have several similarities with regard to their medical device benefit lists. They reimburse listed medical devices separately although they cover them basically by including procedures or a diagnosis-related group (DRG) fee. The K-NHI reimburses for medical devices with low cost-effectiveness using the actual market medical price, similar to other medical devices in the benefit category. However, there are no detailed rules regarding how to set prices for these devices. Every listed medical device is covered at the notified price in Japan, but the prices of new medical devices with improved functions can add 1 -100 percent of the price to the notified price. The prices of devices related to new medical procedures are determined by cost-accounting methods. The NHI service in Taiwan compensates for medical devices which are alternates but clinically improved types through a balance billing method.CONCLUSIONS:The NHI systems in Japan and Taiwan set prices with regard to reimbursements for new medical devices separately, specifically for devices which are advanced clinically or functionally but expensive. The K-NHI must consider establishing a pricing or reimbursement system for new medical devices through the discussion with stakeholders for reasonable reimbursements and decreasing the financial burden on the K-NHI.