Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors
Authors: Muir Bryan R. , Cojocaru Claudiu D. , McEwen Malcolm R. , Ross Carl K. 
Published: July 2017

PurposeTo provide results of water calorimetry and ion chamber measurements in high‐energy electron beams carried out at the National Research Council Canada (NRC). There are three main aspects to this work: (a) investigation of the behavior of ionization chambers in electron beams of different energies with focus on long‐term stability, (b) water calorimetry measurements to determine absorbed dose to water in high‐energy beams for direct calibration of ion chambers, and (c) using measurements of chamber response relative to reference ion chambers, determination of beam quality conversion factors, kQ, for several ion chamber types.MethodsMeasurements are made in electron beams with energies between 8 MeV and 22 MeV from the NRC Elekta Precise clinical linear accelerator. Ion chamber measurements are made as a function of depth for cylindrical and plane‐parallel ion chambers over a period of five years to investigate the stability of ion chamber response and for indirect calibration. Water calorimetry measurements are made in 18 MeV and 22 MeV beams. An insulated enclosure with fine temperature control is used to maintain a constant temperature (drifts less than 0.1 mK/min) of the calorimeter phantom at 4°C to minimize effects from convection. Two vessels of different designs are used with calibrated thermistor probes to measure radiation induced temperature rise. The vessels are filled with high‐purity water and saturated with H2 or N2 gas to minimize the effect of radiochemical reactions on the measured temperature rise. A set of secondary standard ion chambers are calibrated directly against the calorimeter. Finally, several other ion chambers are calibrated in the NRC 60Co reference field and then cross‐calibrated against the secondary standard chambers in electron beams to realize kQ factors.ResultsThe long‐term stability of the cylindrical ion chambers in electron beams is better (always %) than plane‐parallel chambers (0.2% to 0.4%). Calorimetry measurements made at 22 MeV with two different vessel geometries are consistent within 0.2% after correction for the vessel perturbation. Measurements of absorbed dose calibration coefficients for the same secondary standard chamber separated in time by 10 yr are within 0.2%. Drifts in linac output that would affect the transfer of the standard are mitigated to the 0.1% level by performing daily ion chamber normalization measurements. Calibration coefficients for secondary standard ion chambers can be achieved with uncertainties less than 0.4% (k = 1) in high‐energy electron beams. The additional uncertainty in deriving calibration coefficients for well‐behaved chambers indirectly against the secondary standard reference chambers is negligible. The kQ factors measured here differ by up to 1.3% compared to those in TG‐51, an important change for reference dosimetry measurements.ConclusionsThe measurements made here of kQ factors for eight plane‐parallel and six cylindrical ion chambers will impact future updates of reference dosimetry protocols by providing some of the highest quality measurements of this crucial dosimetric parameter.