Comparison of two anthracycline regimens for treatment of breast cancer and the incidence of cardiac injury
Authors: Osataphan N , Power C , Yu C , Nardi Agmon I , Thampinathan B , Abdel-Qadir H , Amir E , Thavendiranathan P 
Published: October 2024

Abstract

Background
Anthracycline based breast cancer treatment regimens have evolved over time. Whether the risk of myocardial injury is different between regimens is unclear.

Purpose
To compare the incidence and significance of high sensitivity troponin-I (TpI) levels immediately post anthracycline therapy in women with breast cancer treated with two different anthracycline regimens.

Methods
We prospectively recruited women with early-stage breast cancer who received either dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC) or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) with or without subsequent HER2 therapy. The ddAC regimen comprises 4 cycles of doxorubicin given every 2 weeks (240mg/m2), whereas FEC consists of 3 cycles of epirubicin given every 3 weeks (total epirubicin dose of 300mg/m2, which is doxorubicin equivalent dose of 240mg/m2 using a cardiovascular toxicity dose ratio of 0.80 as per the 2022 ESC Cardio-oncology guidelines). Clinical characteristics were collected and TpI levels were measured before anthracyclines and 4-6 weeks post last dose. Comprehensive echocardiograms were conducted at baseline and post-therapy.

Results
236 female participants were enrolled; 103 (43.6%) received ddAC and 133 (56.4%) received FEC. Compared to FEC, patients receiving ddAC were older (mean age 58.1±10.2 vs 51.0±9.3 years; p &lt; 0.001) received similar cumulative doxorubicin equivalent dose (237.4±23.4 vs 239.9 ± 11.9 mg/m2; p=0.30), had similar baseline LVEF (62.1 ± 4.8 vs 61.3 ± 3.6%, p=0.14), and TpI levels (median (IQR) 2.0 (2.0-2.0) vs 2 (2.0-3.0) ng/L, p=0.12) respectively. Baseline risk factors were similar (hypertension 21% vs 17%, p=0.34; diabetes 7% vs 5%, p=0.44; dyslipidemia 15% vs. 8%, p=0.12). Post-anthracycline, the ddAC group had higher TpI level compared to patients in the FEC group (median (IQR) 12 (7-29) vs 6 (4-11) ng/L; p&lt;0.001). The proportion of patients with abnormal TpI levels (&gt;99th percentile, &gt;16.0 ng/L) was higher in the ddAC group (43.7% vs 15.0%; p &lt; 0.001). In a multivariable linear regression model that included age, treatment regimen, baseline TpI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, ddAC remained significantly associated with higher post anthracycline TpI levels (β=15.5, 95%CI: 8.7-22.3; p&lt;0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean LVEF post-anthracycline (59.9 ± 5.1 vs 60.0 ± 3.8; p=0.91). No patients developed clinical heart failure.

Conclusion
Despite similar doxorubicin equivalent doses, the incidence of abnormal TpI levels was ~3 fold higher with DD-AC than FEC. Given that DD-AC is now more commonly used especially with immunotherapy this knowledge is clinically relevant. The difference in proportion with troponin elevation could be due to differences in the number of cycles (3 vs 4) and the frequency of chemotherapy administration (every 2 vs 3 weeks) between the regimens. However, this did not translate into a larger reduction in LVEF. But longer-term follow-up is needed.