bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Prognostic Factors in Nonmetastatic Ewing’s Sarcoma of Bone Treated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Analysis of 359 Patients at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Authors: Bacci Gaetano , Ferrari Stefano , Bertoni Franco , Rimondini Simonetta , Longhi Alessandra , Bacchini Patrizia , Forni Cristiana , Manfrini Marco , Donati Davide , Picci Piero 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: The identification of prognostic factors in patients with nonmetastatic Ewing’s sarcoma could allow the use of risk-adapted therapeutic strategies of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on 359 patients with nonmetastatic Ewing’s sarcoma of bone treated at a single institution between January 1979 and April 1995 were retrospectively considered. The influence of clinical, hematologic, therapeutic, and histologic parameters on event-free survival was assessed. RESULTS: By univariate analysis, the following features were found to be associated with a poor prognosis: male sex (P < .02), age older than 12 years (P < .006), fever (P < .0001), anemia (P < .0025), high serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (P < .0001), axial location (P < .04), radiation therapy only for local control (P < .009), type of chemotherapy regimen (P < .0001), and poor chemotherapy-induced necrosis (P < .001). After multivariate analysis, the adverse independent prognostic factors were male sex (P < .04), age older than 12 years (P < .001), fever (P < .0002), anemia (P < .02), high serum LDH level (P < .0003), axial location (P < .02), and type of chemotherapy regimen (P < .0003). When the multivariate analysis was restricted to surgically treated patients, the adverse independent prognostic factors were poor chemotherapy-induced necrosis (P < .0001), fever (P < .015), anemia (P < .02), and high serum LDH level (P < .025). CONCLUSION: The prognosis in cases of nonmetastatic Ewing’s sarcoma is influenced by many different clinical and hematologic variables, all of which are to be considered when patients are being stratified according to the risk of relapse. In surgically treated patients, the most important prognostic factor is chemotherapy-induced necrosis.
Does Paclitaxel Improve the Chemoradiotherapy of Locoregionally Advanced Esophageal Cancer? A Nonrandomized Comparison With Fluorouracil-Based Therapy
Authors: Adelstein David J. , Rice Thomas W. , Rybicki Lisa A. , Larto Marjorie A. , Ciezki Jay , Saxton Jerrold , DeCamp Malcolm , Vargo John J. , Dumot John A. , Zuccaro Gregory 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of accelerated fractionation radiation with concurrent cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy was performed to investigate the role of the paclitaxel, when substituted for fluorouracil (5-FU), in the chemoradiotherapy of esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with an esophageal ultrasound stage of T3 or N1 or M1 (nodal) esophageal cancer were treated with two courses of a cisplatin infusion (20 mg/m2/d for 4 days) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 24 hours) concurrent with a split course of accelerated fractionation radiation (1.5 Gy bid to a total dose of 45 Gy). Surgical resection was performed 4 to 6 weeks later followed by a single identical postoperative course of chemoradiotherapy (24 Gy) in patients with significant residual tumor at surgery. Toxicity and results of this treatment were retrospectively compared with our previous 5-FU and cisplatin chemoradiotherapy experience. RESULTS: Between September 1995 and July 1997, 40 patients were entered onto this study. Although dysphagia proved worse in our 5-FU–treated patients, profound leukopenia and a need for unplanned hospitalization were significantly more common in the paclitaxel group. Thirty-seven patients (93%) proved resectable for cure. The 3-year projected overall survival is 30%, locoregional control is 81%, and distant metastatic disease control is 44%. When compared with a similarly staged cohort of 5-FU–treated patients, there was no advantage for any survival function studied. CONCLUSION: This paclitaxel-based treatment regimen for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer produced increased toxicity with no improvement in results when compared with our previous 5-FU experience. Paclitaxel-based treatments must be carefully and prospectively studied before their incorporation into the standard management of esophageal cancer.
Concomitant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Authors: Cheng Skye Hongiun , Tsai Stella Y. C. , Yen K. Lawrence , Jian James Jer-Min , Chu Nei-Min , Chan Kwan-Yee , Tan Tran-Der , Cheng Jason C. , Hsieh Cheng-Yee , Huang Andrew T. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) continues to carry a failure rate of 15% to 30% when treated with radiotherapy alone; the benefit of concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CCRT) in early-stage NPC is unclear. The purpose of this report is to describe our efforts to improve treatment outcome in early-stage NPC after CCRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 189 newly diagnosed NPC patients without evidence of distant metastases who were treated in our institution between 1990 and 1997, 44 presented with early-stage (stage I and II) disease according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 1997 NPC staging system. Twelve of these patients were treated with radiotherapy alone and 32 with CCRT. Each patient’s head and neck area was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. Radiotherapy was administered at 2 Gy per fraction per day, Monday through Friday, for 35 fractions for a total dose of 70 Gy. Chemotherapy consisting of cis-diamine-dichloroplatinum and fluorouracil was delivered simultaneously with radiotherapy in weeks 1 and 6 and sequentially for two monthly cycles after radiotherapy. RESULTS: Patients who were treated with radiotherapy alone primarily had stage I disease, whereas none of those who were treated with CCRT had stage I disease (11 of 12 patients v none of 32 patients; P = .001). The locoregional control rate at 3 years for the radiotherapy group was 91.7% (median follow-up period, 34 months) and was 100% for the CCRT group (median follow-up period, 44 months) (P = .10). The 3-year disease-free survival rate in the radiotherapy group was 91.7% and was 96.9% in the CCRT group (P = .66). CONCLUSION: Our results reveal excellent prognosis of AJCC 1997 stage II NPC treated with CCRT. Stage II patients with a greater tumor burden treated with CCRT showed an equal disease-free survival, compared with stage I patients treated with radiotherapy alone. A prospective randomized trial is underway to confirm the role of CCRT in stage II NPC.
Early Depressive Symptoms in Cancer Patients Receiving Interleukin 2 and/or Interferon Alfa-2b Therapy
Authors: Capuron Lucile , Ravaud Alain , Dantzer Robert 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Depressive symptomatology is frequently associated with interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon alfa-2b (INFα-2b) therapy in cancer patients. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the depressive and anxiety symptoms induced by IL-2 and/or INFα-2b in cancer patients during the first days of cytokine immunotherapy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 48 patients with renal cell carcinoma or melanoma. Patients were treated either with subcutaneous IL-2, alone (n = 20) or in combination with INFα-2b (n = 6); or with INFα-2b alone, administered subcutaneously at a low dose (n = 8) or intravenously at a high dose (n = 14). Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the Covi scale. Evaluations were performed just before initiation of treatment (day 1) and on days 3 and 5 of treatment.RESULTS: Patients treated with IL-2 alone or in association with INFα-2b had significantly higher MADRS scores after 5 days of cytokine therapy, and patients who received both cytokines had increased scores on day 3. In contrast, patients treated with INFα-2b alone did not have varying MADRS scores during the course of treatment. Cytokine therapy had no effect on anxiety, except in patients treated with IL-2 in combination with INFα-2b. In these patients, the enhancement in anxiety scores that was observed on day 5 was mainly attributable to increased somatic complaints.CONCLUSION: IL-2 and INFα-2b have differential effects on mood, and IL-2 therapy induces depressive symptoms early in treatment.
Primary Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphoma: Review and Current Concepts
Authors: Pandolfino Tomi L. , Siegel Richard S. , Kuzel Timothy M. , Rosen Steven T. , Guitart Joan 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL) has only recently been recognized as a distinct clinical entity. With the advent of improved immunophenotyping and immunogenotyping, increasing numbers of PCBCL cases are being diagnosed. However, there is much confusion regarding the classification, treatment, and prognosis of these patients. The purpose of this article is to review and analyze the available data to provide the clinician with a concise summary of the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of PCBCL. DESIGN: We conducted a thorough review of the medical literature on PCBCL, with a focus on classification, prognosis, and treatment trials. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: PCBCL is defined as a B-cell lymphoma originating in the skin. There is no evidence of extracutaneous disease at presentation and for 6 months after diagnosis, as assessed by adequate staging procedures. Currently, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer classification is the most concise disease classification scheme, dividing the subtypes of PCBCL by clinical behavior and histopathologic findings. Based on this classification, the most common subtype of PCBCL is follicular center cell lymphoma. PCBCL is generally an indolent form of lymphoma with a good prognosis. Although local cutaneous recurrences are observed in 25% to 68% of patients, dissemination to internal organs is rare. Five-year survival rates typically range from 89% to 96%. A specific subtype, large B-cell lymphoma of the leg, is noted to have a poorer prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 58%. Overly aggressive treatment of PCBCL has not been shown to improve survival or prevent relapse. The treatment of choice usually varies depending on the type of PCBCL, the body surface area, and the location of the involvement, as well as the age and general health condition of the patient. The majority of studies indicate that PCBCL is highly responsive to radiation therapy. Polychemotherapy should be reserved for involvement of noncontiguous anatomic sites or those with extracutaneous spread.
Radiation Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsillar Region: A Preferred Alternative to Surgery?
Authors: Mendenhall William M. , Amdur Robert J. , Stringer Scott P. , Villaret Douglas B. , Cassisi Nicholas J. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: There are no definitive randomized studies that compare radiotherapy (RT) with surgery for tonsillar cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of RT alone and RT combined with a planned neck dissection for carcinoma of the tonsillar area and to compare these data with the results of treatment with primary surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred patients were treated between October 1964 and December 1997 and observed for at least 2 years. One hundred forty-one patients underwent planned neck dissection, and 18 patients received induction (17 patients) or concomitant (one patient) chemotherapy. RESULTS: Five-year local control rates, by tumor stage, were as follows: T1, 83%; T2, 81%; T3, 74%; and T4, 60%. Multivariate analysis revealed that local control was significantly influenced by tumor stage (P = .0001), fractionation schedule (P = .0038), and external beam dose (P = .0227). Local control after RT for early-stage cancers was higher for tonsillar fossa/posterior pillar cancers than for those arising from the anterior tonsillar pillar. Five-year cause-specific survival rates, by disease stage, were as follows: I, 100%; II, 86%; III, 82%; IVa, 63%; and IVb, 22%. Multivariate analysis revealed that cause-specific survival was significantly influenced by overall stage (P = .0001), planned neck dissection (P = .0074), and histologic differentiation (P = .0307). The incidence of severe late complications after treatment was 5%. CONCLUSION: RT alone or combined with a planned neck dissection provides cure rates that are as good as those after surgery and is associated with a lower rate of severe complications.
Subcutaneous Administration of Amifostine During Fractionated Radiotherapy: A Randomized Phase II Study
Authors: Koukourakis Michael I. , Kyrias George , Kakolyris Stelios , Kouroussis Charalambos , Frangiadaki Chryssi , Giatromanolaki Alexandra , Retalis George , Georgoulias Vassilios 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Amifostine (WR-2721) is an impotant cytoprotective agent. Although intravenous administration is the standard route, pharmacokinetic studies have shown acceptable plasma levels of the active metabolite of amifostine (WR-1605) after subcutaneous administration. The subcutaneous route, due to its simplicity, presents multiple advantages over the intravenous route when amifostine is used during fractionated radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with thoracic, 40 with head and neck, and 40 with pelvic tumors who were undergoing radical radiotherapy were enrolled onto a randomized phase II trial to assess the feasibility, tolerance, and cytoprotective efficacy of amifostine administered subcutaneously. A flat dose of amifostine 500 mg, diluted in 2.5 mL of normal saline, was injected subcutaneously 20 minutes before each radiotherapy fraction. RESULTS: The subcutaneous amifostine regimen was well tolerated by 85% of patients. In approximately 5% of patients, amifostine therapy was interrupted due to cumulative asthenia, and in 10%, due to a fever/rash reaction. Hypotension was never noted, whereas nausea was frequent. A significant reduction of pharyngeal, esophageal, and rectal mucositis was noted in the amifostine arm (P < .04). The delays in radiotherapy because of grade 3 mucositis were significanly longer in the group of patients treated with radiotherapy alone (P < .04). Amifostine significantly reduced the incidence of acute perineal skin and bladder toxicity (P < .0006). CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous administration of amifostine is well tolerated, effectively reduces radiotherapy’s early toxicity, and prevents delays in radiotherapy. The subcutaneous route is much simpler and saves time compared with the intravenous route of administration and can be safely and effectively applied in the daily, busy radiotherapy practice.
Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Repeating Doublet Therapy in Previously Treated, Relapsed Breast Cancer Patients
Authors: Nagourney Robert A. , Link John S. , Blitzer Jonathan B. , Forsthoff Cynthia , Evans Steven S. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin for patients with relapsed adenocarcinoma of the breast. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously treated patients with adenocarcinoma of the breast received cisplatin (30 mg/m2) plus gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle, which was changed after patient no. 12 to cisplatin (30 mg/m2) plus gemcitabine (750 mg/m2) days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Of 30 patients, three (10%) had complete and 12 (40%) had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 50%. Two objective responses were observed among the four patients accrued after relapse that followed high-dose/stem-cell therapies. The median time to progression was 14 weeks. The median time to progression for objective responders was 23.5 weeks, with a range of 8 to 68 weeks. Toxicities included grades III and IV neutropenia in 13%, anemia in 6%, thrombocytopenia in 31%, grade III nausea in 4%, and grade II peripheral neuropathy in 2% of 151 treatment cycles. Moderate alopecia occurred in four patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is active and tolerable for patients with relapsed breast cancer. Responses observed in previously treated patients, including high-dose/stem-cell failures, indicate activity in otherwise drug-refractory patients.
Intention to Undergo Prophylactic Bilateral Mastectomy in Women at Increased Risk of Developing Hereditary Breast Cancer
Authors: Meiser Bettina , Butow Phyllis , Friedlander Michael , Schnieden Vivienne , Gattas Michael , Kirk Judy , Suthers Graeme , Haan Eric , Tucker Katherine 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To assess intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy and psychologic determinants in unaffected women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred thirty-three women who were awaiting their initial appointments for risk assessment, advice about surveillance, and prophylactic options at one of 14 familial cancer clinics participated in a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of women would consider and 47% would not consider a prophylactic mastectomy, should genetic testing identify a mutation in a breast cancer–predisposing gene, whereas 34% were unsure and 1% had already undergone a prophylactic mastectomy. In a bivariate analysis, women at a moderately increased risk of developing breast cancer had the highest proportion of subjects reporting that they would consider a prophylactic mastectomy (25%), compared with women at high risk (16%) (χ2 = 7.79; P = .051). In multivariate analyses, consideration of prophylactic mastectomy strongly correlated with high levels of breast cancer anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 17.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.35 to 69.71; P = .0001) and overestimation of one’s breast cancer risk (OR = 3.01; 95% CI, 1.43 to 6.32; P = .0036), whereas there was no association with objective breast cancer risk (P = .60). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer would consider prophylactic mastectomy. Although prophylactic mastectomy may be appropriate in women at high risk of developing breast cancer, it is perhaps less so in those who have a moderately increased risk. Such moderate-risk women are likely to benefit from interventions aimed at reducing breast cancer anxiety and correcting exaggerated breast cancer risk perceptions.
Declining Cancer Rates in the 1990s
Authors: McKean-Cowdin Roberta , Feigelson Heather Spencer , Ross Ronald K. , Pike Malcolm C. , Henderson Brian E. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To provide evidence of a substantial decline in cancer rates for the period 1991 through 1995 and characterize major risk factors that seem to be driving secular trends in cancer mortality and incidence.DESIGN: Incidence and mortality rates were calculated using national surveillance data collected through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and the National Center for Health Statistics.RESULTS: All-sites cancer incidence and mortality fell in the period 1991 through 1995; this decline is largely attributable to decreases in the smoking-related cancers, especially lung cancer. Of the 20 leading incident cancers today, both incidence and mortality are decreasing among 11 sites for men and 12 for women. In men, the decline in mortality has been notable and is especially apparent for the smoking-related cancers, including those of the lung, oral cavity and pharynx, larynx, and, to a lesser extent, bladder. In women, all-sites mortality decreased only approximately 0.4% from 1991 through 1995. Three cancers continued to show substantial increases in mortality through 1995 for both men and women (liver, multiple myeloma, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma), while incidence rates continued to climb for liver cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and melanoma.CONCLUSION: Data from the SEER program on recent trends in cancer incidence and mortality show that cancer rates are generally on the decline, largely because of reductions in smoking-related cancers. A consistent increase in mortality rates due to liver cancer poses a new health care challenge, one that will require the development of an effective treatment for individuals currently infected with hepatitis C or B to prevent mortality rates from continuing to increase.
Phase I, Dose-Finding, and Pharmacokinetic Study of Raltitrexed Combined With Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Cancer
Authors: Fizazi Karim , Ducreux Michel , Ruffié Pierre , Bonnay Marc , Daniel Catherine , Soria Jean-Charles , Hill Catherine , Fandi Abderrahim , Poterre Marc , Smith Mark , Armand Jean-Pierre 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin combination regimen, to explore its safety and pharmacokinetics, and to assess its antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients received the combination of raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin. Raltitrexed was administered as a 15-minute infusion followed by oxaliplatin as a 2-hour infusion 1 hour later, repeated every 3 weeks. Seven dose levels were explored, ranging from 2 to 3.75 mg/m2 and from 85 to 130 mg/m2 for raltitrexed and oxaliplatin, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of both raltitrexed and oxaliplatin was assessed at the last three dose levels. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were assessable for toxicity. Severe toxicities usually occurred from dose level V (raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2). This combination was not myelosuppressive, eliciting only sporadic grades 3 and 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia without complications. There was no alopecia. DLTs were asthenia and nausea/vomiting, despite systematic antiemetic prophylaxis. Dose level VI (raltitrexed 3.5 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2) was deemed to be the MTD. Eight confirmed partial responses were observed: six patients with malignant mesothelioma (both pretreated and nonpretreated), one with fluorouracil-refractory pancreatic carcinoma, and one with renal carcinoma. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of both drugs did not suggest any drug interaction. CONCLUSION: The combination of raltitrexed and oxaliplatin given as consecutive short infusions every 3 weeks seems to be an acceptable regimen that allows a dose-intensity as high as the sum of the recommended doses of each agent given alone. The dose recommended for further phase II studies is raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Promising antitumor activity has been observed in patients with malignant mesothelioma.