bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
MDR1 Gene Expression and Outcome in Osteosarcoma: A Prospective, Multicenter Study
Authors: Wunder Jay S. , Bull Shelley B. , Aneliunas Vicky , Lee Peter D. , Davis Aileen M. , Beauchamp Chris P. , Conrad Ernest U. , Grimer Robert J. , Healey John H. , Rock Michael J. , Bell Robert S. , Andrulis Irene L. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Increased expression of the multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) has been implicated in osteosarcoma prognosis. This study represents the first prospective assessment of the prognostic value of MDR1 mRNA expression in patients with newly diagnosed extremity osteosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of patients with high-grade, nonmetastatic extremity osteosarcoma were enrolled from six tertiary care institutions and observed prospectively for tumor recurrence (median follow-up duration, 30 months). All patients were treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Tumors from 123 patients were analyzed for MDR1 mRNA expression. The association of the level of MDR1 expression with the risk of systemic recurrence was examined using survival analyses with traditional and histologic markers as prognostic factors. RESULTS: Using the highest MDR1 value for each patient, a dose-response relationship was not identified between the level of MDR1 expression and systemic relapse (relative risk, 1.15; P = .44). Analyses based on biopsy or resection values alone gave similar results (P = .11 and .41, respectively, log rank test). In multivariate analysis, large tumor size (> 9 cm) was the only significant independent predictor of systemic outcome (relative risk, 2.8; P = .002). CONCLUSION: We did not identify any correlation between MDR1 mRNA expression and disease progression in patients with osteosarcoma. It is likely that alterations in other genes are involved in resistance to chemotherapy in osteosarcoma and that they play a more critical role than MDR1 in this disease.
Cognitive Function in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Authors: Brezden Christine B. , Phillips Kelly-Anne , Abdolell Mohamed , Bunston Terry , Tannock Ian F. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy have complained of difficulties in their ability to remember, think, and concentrate. This study assessed whether there are differences in cognitive function between breast cancer patients treated with standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy compared with healthy controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The High Sensitivity Cognitive Screen and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) were used to assess cognitive function and mood in a group of 107 women. The women consisted of 31 breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (group A), 40 breast cancer patients who had completed adjuvant chemotherapy a median of 2 years earlier (group B), and 36 healthy controls (group C). RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed statistically significant differences (P = .009) in overall cognitive function scores between groups A and C, with poorer function in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. These differences remained significant (P = .046) when controlling for age, education level, and menopausal status. More patients had moderate or severe cognitive impairment in groups A and B than in controls (P ≤ .002). There were no significant differences in POMS scores between the groups, suggesting that the differences seen in cognitive scores were unlikely to be because of mood disturbance. CONCLUSION: Cognitive differences were observed in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy compared with healthy controls. These differences did not seem to be caused by significant differences in mood disturbance between the two groups. If confirmed, these results have substantial implications for informed consent, counseling, and psychosocial support of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil Versus Tamoxifen Plus Ovarian Suppression as Adjuvant Treatment of Estrogen Receptor–Positive Pre-/Perimenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: Results of the Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Study Group 02 Randomized Trial
Authors: Boccardo F. , Rubagotti A. , Amoroso D. , Mesiti M. , Romeo D. , Sismondi P. , Giai M. , Genta F. , Pacini P. , Distante V. , Bolognesi A. , Aldrighetti D. , Farris A. ,   for the Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Study Group
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of chemotherapy versus that of tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression in pre-/perimenopausal estrogen receptor–positive patients with early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either six cycles of a standard regimen of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8 (CMF), with all drugs restarted on day 29, or 5 years of tamoxifen, 30 mg/d, plus ovarian suppression with surgical oophorectomy, ovarian irradiation, or monthly goserelin 3.6-mg injections. Disease-free survival was the main study end point. Overall survival and toxicity were additional end points. RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1997, 120 patients were assigned to CMF and 124 to tamoxifen and ovarian suppression (oophorectomy, n = 6; ovarian irradiation, n = 31; and goserelin injections, n = 87). At the time of analysis (median follow-up time, 76 months; range, 9 to 121 months), 82 patients had relapsed and 39 had died. No difference between groups had emerged with respect to either disease-free or overall survival. Treatments were comparable even in respect to age, tumor size, and nodal status, although a nonsignificant trend favored patients with poorly differentiated tumors treated with CMF. Leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and alopecia were significantly more common in patients treated with CMF. There were few patients who developed benign gynecologic changes in either group, and numbers were comparable. CONCLUSION: The combination of tamoxifen with ovarian suppression seems to be safe and to yield comparable results relative to standard CMF.
Docetaxel for Patients With Paclitaxel-Resistant Müllerian Carcinoma
Authors: Verschraegen Claire F. , Sittisomwong Tul , Kudelka Andrzej P. , Guedes Ernesto de Paula , Steger Melissa , Nelson-Taylor Tarra , Vincent Monique , Rogers Roger , Atkinson E. Neely , Kavanagh John J. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel in patients with müllerian carcinoma resistant to paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer who failed paclitaxel-based chemotherapy received either 100 or 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel every 3 weeks. Resistance to paclitaxel was defined as either progression of disease during treatment, failure to achieve regression of disease after at least four courses, or rapid recurrence (within 6 months) after completion of therapy. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were treated on a formal protocol and fourteen with the commercially available docetaxel. Thirty were assessable for response. Toxicities were thoroughly evaluated in the 18 patients on protocol. Twenty-seven patients (85%) had epithelial ovarian cancer. The overall response rate was 23% (one complete and six partial responses), with a median survival time of 44 weeks (9.5 months). Nine patients had stable disease and 14 progressive disease. Among 19 patients who progressed during prior paclitaxel treatment, two (11%) responded to docetaxel, compared with five (45%) of 11 patients in other paclitaxel-resistance categories. The responders had a median taxane-free interval (ie, the time between the last paclitaxel and first docetaxel treatment) of 73 weeks, compared with 19 weeks for the nonresponder group. Toxic effects were as expected. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is an active chemotherapeutic agent in patients with müllerian carcinoma previously treated with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, especially in the patients who had a long taxane-free interval after a previous short response to paclitaxel.
Phase I Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of Oral S-1 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Authors: van Groeningen Cees J. , Peters Godefridus J. , Schornagel Jan H. , Gall Helen , Noordhuis Paul , de Vries Martin J. , Turner Sue L. , Swart Martha S. , Pinedo Herbert M. , Hanauske Axel R. , Giaccone Giuseppe 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To investigate the side effects, determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and study the pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine-based antineoplastic agent consisting of the fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug tegafur combined with two modulators, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine and potassium oxonate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors received S-1 bid for 28 days, followed by 1 week of rest. 5-FU pharmacokinetics were investigated after a single initial dose of S-1 during the first 24 hours and weekly thereafter. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients received S-1 at the four consecutive dose levels of 25, 45, 35, and 40 mg/m2. The MTD was initially found at 45 mg/m2, with diarrhea as the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Diarrhea was also the DLT at the dose of 40 mg/m2, which was the MTD for patients exposed to extensive prior chemotherapy. Other toxicities were generally mild. Two patients had a reduction of more than 50% in tumor dimension. Plasma pharmacokinetics of 5-FU were linear; at the highest S-1 dose level, 5-FU plasma peak concentrations reached 1 to 2 μmol/L, and the half-life of 5-FU was 3 to 4 hours. A statistically significant relationship was observed between the severity of diarrhea and pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of S-1 in chemotherapy-naive or minimally chemotherapy-exposed patients is 40 mg/m2 bid on 28 consecutive days, every 5 weeks. In heavily pretreated patients, the recommended dose is 35 mg/m2 bid. Phase II trials are warranted in tumors known to be responsive to 5-FU treatment.
Leucovorin and Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Authors: de Gramont A. , Figer A. , Seymour M. , Homerin M. , Hmissi A. , Cassidy J. , Boni C. , Cortes-Funes H. , Cervantes A. , Freyer G. , Papamichael D. , Le Bail N. , Louvet C. , Hendler D. , de Braud F. , Wilson C. , Morvan F. , Bonetti A. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m2/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m2/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m2/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. RESULTS: Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P = .0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P = .0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P = .12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41.7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P = .004). CONCLUSION: The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.
Cisplatin, Ifosfamide, Oral Etoposide, and Concurrent Accelerated Hyperfractionated Thoracic Radiation for Patients With Limited Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 93-12
Authors: Glisson Bonnie , Scott Charles , Komaki Ritsuko , Movsas Benjamin , Wagner Henry 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: The combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and oral etoposide (PIEo) given concurrently with accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiation was studied in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer in a phase II trial to assess response, survival, and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients were accrued between March 1994 and April 1996. Chemotherapy doses were cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 1,200 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 and etoposide 40 mg/m2 administered orally days 1 through 14. Radiation consisted of accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiation (AHTRT) 1.5 Gy bid × 30 fractions (total 45 Gy) days 1 through 19, concurrent with cycle 1 of chemotherapy. Three additional cycles of chemotherapy were given every 4 weeks after completion of chemoradiation. Prophylactic cranial radiation (25 Gy in 10 fractions) was offered to patients for whom complete response (CR) after completion of chemotherapy was achieved. RESULTS: An overall objective response rate of 78% (41 CRs [67%] and seven partial responses [11%]) was seen in 61 patients whose disease response could be evaluated. Median progression-free and overall survival estimates were 12.7 and 23.7 months, respectively. Two- and 3-year survival rates were estimated at 50% and 39%, respectively. Major toxic effects included grade 4 granulocytopenia in 34 (55%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 16 (26%), grade 3 to 5 fever/infection in six (10%; with one death resulting from sepsis), and grade 3/4 esophagitis in 27 patients (43%). Other nonhematologic toxic greater than grade 2 occurred in 11 patients (18%). CONCLUSION: Relative to conventional etoposide/cisplatin and concurrent AHTRT, chemoradiation with PIEo produced similar median and 2-year survival rates and a higher rate of acute esophageal toxicity. However, the locoregional control rate with a minimum follow-up of 2 years is excellent at 80%. It is conceivable that longer follow-up will prove this regimen more promising. Research efforts should focus on other methods to improve disease control in all potential sites of recurrence.
The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer Risk Index: A Multinational Scoring System for Identifying Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenic Cancer Patients
Authors: Klastersky Jean , Paesmans Marianne , Rubenstein Edward B. , Boyer Michael , Elting Linda , Feld Ronald , Gallagher James , Herrstedt Jorn , Rapoport Bernardo , Rolston Kenneth , Talcott James ,   for the Study Section on Infections of Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia remains a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer chemotherapy, but some patients are at low risk for serious medical complications. The purpose of this study was to develop an internationally validated scoring system to identify these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Febrile neutropenic cancer patients were observed in a prospective multinational study. Independent factors assessable at fever onset, predicting low risk of complications, on a randomly selected derivation set, were assigned integer weights to develop a risk-index score, which was subsequently tested on a validation set. RESULTS: On the derivation set (756 patients), predictive factors were a burden of illness indicating absence of symptoms or mild symptoms (weight, 5; odds ratio [OR], 8.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.15 to 16.38) or moderate symptoms (weight, 3; OR, 3.70; 95% CI, 2.18 to 6.29); absence of hypotension (weight, 5; OR, 7.62; 95% CI, 2.91 to 19.89); absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (weight, 4; OR, 5.35; 95% CI, 1.86 to 15.46); presence of solid tumor or absence of previous fungal infection in patients with hematologic malignancies (weight, 4; OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.97 to 12.95); outpatient status (weight, 3; OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.02 to 6.04); absence of dehydration (weight, 3; OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.89 to 7.73); and age less than 60 years (weight, 2; OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.51 to 4.01). On the validation set, a Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk-index score ≥ 21 identified low-risk patients with a positive predictive value of 91%, specificity of 68%, and sensitivity of 71%. CONCLUSION: The risk index accurately identifies patients at low risk for complications and may be used to select patients for testing therapeutic strategies that may be more convenient or cost-effective.
Phase II Study of Liposomal Doxorubicin in Platinum- and Paclitaxel-Refractory Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Authors: Gordon Alan N. , Granai C.O. , Rose Peter G. , Hainsworth John , Lopez Ana , Weissman Charles , Rosales Rosemary , Sharpington Timothy 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Stealth liposomal doxorubicin (Alzal Corp, Palo Alto, CA) has a slower clearance rate than free doxorubicin, resulting in sustained serum levels. Liposomal encapsulation also leads to increased concentration of drug in tumor tissue. Meta-analysis of previous studies has shown that doxorubicin has activity in epithelial ovarian cancer. The current study was developed to examine the activity of Stealth liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had epithelial ovarian cancer that either progressed on or recurred within 6 months of completion of platinum and paclitaxel chemotherapy. All patients had measurable disease. Stealth liposomal doxorubicin was administered at 50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks as a 1-hour infusion. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were treated and included in an intent-to-treat analysis. There were 82 patients who were platinum and paclitaxel refractory and met all study criteria. There was one complete response and 14 partial responses, for a total response rate of 16.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1% to 24.6%). For platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory patients, the response rate was 18.3% (95% CI, 9.9% to 26.7%). Median time to progression was 19.3 weeks for the entire population. Ten patients (11.2%) withdrew because of adverse events related to the drug (palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia [PPE], n = 3; asthenia, n = 2; cardiac, n = 2; neutropenia, n = 1; stomatitis, n = 1; and edema, n = 1). There were no drug-related fatal events. There were only eight grade 4 adverse events attributable to the drug. Stomatitis, PPE, and skin lesions were managed with dose reductions and delays in most cases. CONCLUSION: Stealth liposomal doxorubicin has activity in refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. PPE and stomatitis can usually be managed by dose adjustment. The ease of administration makes this an attractive agent.
Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel in Unknown Primary Carcinoma: A Phase II Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study
Authors: Briasoulis Evangelos , Kalofonos Haralambos , Bafaloukos Dimitris , Samantas Epaminondas , Fountzilas George , Xiros Nikolaos , Skarlos Dimosthenis , Christodoulou Christos , Kosmidis Paris , Pavlidis Nicholas 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of the carboplatin/paclitaxel combination in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven consecutive CUP patients (45 women and 32 men; median age, 60 years) were treated with carboplatin at target area under the curve 6 mg/mL/min followed by paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor from days 5 to 12. Treatment courses were repeated every 3 weeks to a maximum of eight cycles. Forty-seven patients had adenocarcinomas, 27 had undifferentiated carcinomas, and three had squamous cell carcinomas. Thirty-three patients presented with liver, bone, or multiple organ metastases, 23 with predominantly nodal/pleural disease, and 19 (16 women) with peritoneal carcinomatosis. RESULTS: The overall response rate by intent-to-treat analysis was 38.7% (95% confidence interval, 27.5% to 49.9%). There were no differences in response between adenocarcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas, but efficacy varied among clinical subsets. The response rates and median survival times in the three clinically defined subsets were 47.8% and 13 months, respectively, for patients with predominantly nodal/pleural disease, 68.4% and 15 months, respectively, in women with peritoneal carcinomatosis, and 15.1% and 10 months, respectively, in patients with visceral or disseminated metastases. Chemotherapy was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin plus paclitaxel combination chemotherapy is effective in patients with predominantly nodal/pleural metastases of unknown primary carcinoma and in women with peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, in patients with liver, bone, or multiple organ involvement, the combination offers limited benefit. The investigation of novel treatment approaches is highly warranted for this group of patients.
Rituximab Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Safety and Efficacy of Re-Treatment
Authors: Davis Thomas A. , Grillo-López Antonio J. , White Christine A. , McLaughlin Peter , Czuczman Myron S. , Link Brian K. , Maloney David G. , Weaver Robin L. , Rosenberg Jay , Levy Ronald 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of re-treatment with rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in patients with low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma who relapsed after a response to rituximab therapy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled onto this study, and two were re-treated within the study. Patients received an intravenous infusion of 375 mg/m2of rituximab weekly for 4 weeks. All patients had at least two prior therapies and had received at least one prior course of rituximab, with a median interval of 14.5 months between rituximab courses.RESULTS: Most adverse experiences (AEs) were transient grade 1 or 2 events occurring during the treatment period. Clinically significant myelosuppression was not observed; hematologic toxicity was generally mild and reversible. No patient developed human antichimeric antibodies after treatment. The type, frequency, and severity of AEs in this study were not apparently different from those reported in the phase III trial of rituximab. The overall response rate in 57 assessable patients was 40% (11% complete response and 30% partial responses). Median time to progression (TTP) in responders and median duration of response (DR) have not been reached, but Kaplan-Meier estimated medians are 17.8 months (range, 5.4+ to 26.6 months) and 16.3 months (range, 3.7+ to 25.1 months), respectively. These estimated medians are longer than the medians achieved in the patients’ prior course of rituximab (TTP and DR of 12.4 and 9.8 months, respectively, P > .1) and in a previously reported phase III trial (TTP in responders and DR of 13.2 and 11.6 months, respectively). Responses are ongoing in seven of 23 responders.CONCLUSION: In this re-treatment population, safety and efficacy were not apparently different from those after initial rituximab exposure.