Masked hypertension is highly prevalent among patients with high-normal office blood pressure - based on the results of the Hungarian ABPM Registry
Authors: Pasztor D , Nemcsik J , Takacs J , Kekk Z S , Farsang C S , Simon A , Pall D , Torzsa P , Dolgos S Z , Koller A , Jarai Z 
Published: October 2024

Abstract

Background
Current European guidelines recommend initiating antihypertensive treatment for patients with high-normal office blood pressure (HNOBP) if their cardiovascular (CV) risk is very high.1 Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a recommended tool to identify whitecoat- (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH), and both conditions can be present in patients with HNOBP.

Purpose
The purpose of our study was to assess the prevalence of white-coat and masked hypertension in patients with HNOBP, the proportion of very high CV risk, and to identify the predictors of WCH and MH.

Methods
We collected data from the Hungarian ABPM Registry, which is an ongoing, multicenter, open-label, observational study including 38720 adult patients. ABPMs were performed with validated Meditech ABPM-06 monitors. We analyzed the ABPM curves of 4389 HNOBP patients. In the diagnosis of hypertension, 24 hour-, daytime- and nighttime mean BP values were each considered separately. OBP measurements and ABPMs were performed by GPs, internists and cardiologists. 89 patients were excluded due to missing data.

Results
ABPM recordings confirmed MH in 67.4%(n=2899) of the cases, while WCH in 15.3%(n=659). In 17.3%(n=742) BP was in HN category both in the office and with ABPM (apparent high-normal blood pressure /appHNBP/). WCH patients (57.11±17.47) were older, than appHNBP (54.54±16.9), and MH patients (53.38±16.70)(p&lt;0.001). WCH (19.4%, n=489) and appHNBP (19.4%, n=488) were more frequent among females, than in males (14.3%, n=254; 9.6%, n=170, respectively, p&lt;0.001). However, MH was more prevalent in males compared to females (76.2%(n=1355) vs 61.2%(n=1544), respectively, p&lt;0.001). Snoring, obesity and diabetes mellitus were more frequent in MH than in appHNBP and WHC patients (Snoring: 30.6%(n=887) vs. 25.7%(n=191) vs. 20.8%(n=137), p&lt;0.001; Obesity: 22.9%(n=663) vs. 16.0%(n=119) vs. 13.4%(n=88), p&lt;0.001;Diabetes mellitus: 12.1%(n=350) vs. 8.9%(n=66) vs. 9.9%(n=65), respectively, p=0.025). Independent predictors of WCH were age (OR=1.01[1.003;1.02]), female sex (OR=1.50[1.19;1.89]) and snoring (OR=0.76[0.59;0.97]). Independent predictors of MH were male sex (OR=1.69[1.43;2.00]), snoring (OR=1.27[1.06;1.53]) and obesity (OR=1.55[1.25;1.92]). 76% of all patients received antihypertensive treatment irrespective of the BP groups (WCH: 76.2%(n=502), appHNBP: 76.3%(n=566), MH: 76.5%(n=2217), p=NS). 11.7%(n=502) of all patients had very high CV risk and only 2.5%(n=25) did not receive antihypertensive treatment. Similar results were found among WCH, appHNBP and MH patients (very high CV risk: 13.8%(n=91) vs. 11.2%(n=83) vs.11.7%(n=328), p=NS; no treatment: 1.9%(n=3) vs. 1.7%(n=3) vs. 2.8%(n=19), p=NS).

Conclusions
In patients with HNOBP, MH is highly prevalent. MH might be suspected in young, obese, male patients with diabetes mellitus and snoring. WCH was more frequent in older females. Based on our data, the majority of patients with HNOBP and very high CV risk are treated.