bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Brachytherapy treatment planning commissioning: effect of the election of proper bibliography and finite size of TG‐43 input data on standard treatments
Authors: Valdés Christian N. , Píriz Gustavo H. , Lozano Enrrique 
Published: February 2017

The aim of this work is to evaluate the performance of a commercial brachytherapy treatment planning system (TPS) with TG‐43 Vendors Input Data (VID), analyze possible discrepancies with respect to a proper reference source and its implications for standard treatments, and judge the effectiveness of certain widespread recommended quality controls to find potential errors related with the interpolations of TG‐43 VID tables. The TPS evaluated was a BrachyVision 8.6 loaded with TG‐43 VID for a VariSource high‐dose‐rate source (Vs2000). The reference data chosen were the TG‐43 data published in the literature. In the first step, we compared TG‐43 VID with respect to the chosen reference data. Next, we used percent dose‐rate differences in a point array matrix to compare the outcomes of the TPS on standard treatment setup with respect to an in‐house developed program (MATLAB R2009a‐based) loaded with the chosen full TG‐43 reference data. The cases with major discrepancies were evaluated using the gamma‐index analysis. The comparison with the reference data indicated a lack of sample in the angles between near to the tip (between ) and cable () of the , which causes a dose underestimation of approximately 17% in the investigated points due to inaccurate interpolations. The differences over 2% encompassed approximately 17% of the surrounding source volume. These results have special relevance in treatment using one applicator with a few dwell steps or in Fletcher treatments where 10% dose underestimates were identified within the tumor or in organs at risk, respectively. Our results suggest that the differences found in the TPS under study are created by a lack of information on the angles in high‐gradient zones in the , which generates important differences in dosimetric results. In contrast, the gamma analysis shows very good results (between 90% and 100% of passed points) in the analyzed treatments (one dwell and Fletcher). Further studies are required to exclude the possibility of finding noticeable effects in the DVH of treatment plans caused by the discrepancies here described. To achieve more strict control over the TPS dose‐rate calculation, we recommend using QA test thinking in a source with nonaxial symmetry, adding a control point on the angles of the high‐dose gradient zones (e.g., between 0° and 15° and between 165° and 180°). More studies are required to achieve full understanding of the clinical implication of such discrepancies.PACS number: 87.55.Qr
Long‐term evaluation and cross‐checking of two geometric calibrations of kV and MV imaging systems for Linacs
Authors: Chiu Tsuicheng D. , Yan Yulong , Foster Ryan , Mao Weihua 
Published: February 2017

Geometric or mechanical accuracy of kV and MV imaging systems of two Varian TrueBeam linacs have been monitored by two geomertirc calibration systems, Varian IsoCal geometric calibration system and home‐developed gQA system. Results of both systems are cross‐checked and the long‐term geometric stabilities of linacs are evaluated. Two geometric calibration methodologies have been used to assess kV and MV imaging systems and their coincidence periodically on two TrueBeam linacs for about one year. Both systems analyze kV or MV projection images of special designed phantoms to retrieve geometric parameters of the imaging systems. The isocenters — laser isocenter and centers of rotations of kV imager and EPID — are then calculated, based on results of multiple projections from different angles. Long‐term calibration results from both systems are compared for cross‐checking. There are 24 sessions of side‐by‐side calibrations performed by both systems on two TrueBeam linacs. All the disagreements of isocenters between two calibrations systems are less than 1 mm with SD. Most of the large disagreements occurred in vertical direction (AP direction), with an averaged disagreement of 0.45 mm. The average disagreements of isocenters are 0.09 mm in other directions. Additional to long‐term calibration monitoring, for the accuracy test, special tests were performed by misaligning QA phantoms on purpose (5 mm away from setup isocenter in AP, SI, and lateral directions) to test the liability performance of both systems with the known deviations. The errors are within 0.5 mm. Both geometric calibration systems, IsoCal and gQA, are capable of detecting geometric deviations of kV and MV imaging systems of linacs. The long‐term evaluation also shows that the deviations of geometric parameters and the geometric accuracies of both linacs are small and very consistent during the one‐year study period.PACS number: 87.56.Fc
Evaluation of GMI and PMI diffeomorphic‐based demons algorithms for aligning PET and CT Images
Authors: Yang Juan , Wang Hongjun , Zhang You , Yin Yong 
Published: February 2017

Fusion of anatomic information in computed tomography (CT) and functional information in positron emission tomography (PET) is crucial for accurate differentiation of tumor from benign masses, designing radiotherapy treatment plan and staging of cancer. Although current PET and CT images can be acquired from combined PET/CT scanner, the two acquisitions are scanned separately and take a long time, which may induce potential positional errors in global and local caused by respiratory motion or organ peristalsis. So registration (alignment) of whole‐body PET and CT images is a prerequisite for their meaningful fusion. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of two multimodal registration algorithms for aligning PET and CT images. The proposed gradient of mutual information (GMI)‐based demons algorithm, which incorporated the GMI between two images as an external force to facilitate the alignment, was compared with the point‐wise mutual information (PMI) diffeomorphic‐based demons algorithm whose external force was modified by replacing the image intensity difference in diffeomorphic demons algorithm with the PMI to make it appropriate for multimodal image registration. Eight patients with esophageal cancer(s) were enrolled in this IRB‐approved study. Whole‐body PET and CT images were acquired from a combined PET/CT scanner for each patient. The modified Hausdorff distance () was used to evaluate the registration accuracy of the two algorithms. Of all patients, the mean values and standard deviations (SDs) of were 6.65 voxels and 6.01 after the GMI‐based demons and the PMI diffeomorphic‐based demons registration algorithms respectively. Preliminary results on oncological patients showed that the respiratory motion and organ peristalsis in PET/CT esophageal images could not be neglected, although a combined PET/CT scanner was used for image acquisition. The PMI diffeomorphic‐based demons algorithm was more accurate than the GMI‐based demons algorithm in registering PET/CT esophageal images.PACS numbers: 87.57.nj, 87.57. Q‐, 87.57.uk
Development of an automatic evaluation method for patient positioning error
Authors: Kubota Yoshiki , Tashiro Mutsumi , Shinohara Ayaka , Abe Satoshi , Souda Saki , Okada Ryosuke , Ishii Takayoshi , Kanai Tatsuaki , Ohno Tatsuya , Nakano Takashi 
Published: February 2017

Highly accurate radiotherapy needs highly accurate patient positioning. At our facility, patient positioning is manually performed by radiology technicians. After the positioning, positioning error is measured by manually comparing some positions on a digital radiography image (DR) to the corresponding positions on a digitally reconstructed radiography image (DRR). This method is prone to error and can be time‐consuming because of its manual nature. Therefore, we propose an automated measuring method for positioning error to improve patient throughput and achieve higher reliability. The error between a position on the DR and a position on the DRR was calculated to determine the best matched position using the block‐matching method. The zero‐mean normalized cross‐correlation was used as our evaluation function, and the Gaussian weight function was used to increase importance as the pixel position approached the isocenter. The accuracy of the calculation method was evaluated using pelvic phantom images, and the method's effectiveness was evaluated on images of prostate cancer patients before the positioning, comparing them with the results of radiology technicians' measurements. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the calculation method for the pelvic phantom was . The coefficients between the calculation method and the measurement results of the technicians were 0.989 for the phantom images and 0.980 for the patient images. The RMSE of the total evaluation results of positioning for prostate cancer patients using the calculation method was . Using the proposed method, we successfully measured residual positioning errors. The accuracy and effectiveness of the method was evaluated for pelvic phantom images and images of prostate cancer patients. In the future, positioning for cancer patients at other sites will be evaluated using the calculation method. Consequently, we expect an improvement in treatment throughput for these other sites.PACS number: 87
Generation and verification of QFix kVue Calypso‐compatible couch top model for a dedicated stereotactic linear accelerator with FFF beams
Authors: Gardner Stephen J. , Gulam Misbah , Song Kwang , Li Haisen , Huang Yimei , Zhao Bo , Qin Yujiao , Snyder Karen , Kim Jinkoo , Gordon James , Chetty Indrin J. , Wen Ning 
Published: February 2017

This study details the generation, verification, and implementation of a treatment planning system (TPS) couch top model for patient support system used in conjunction with a dedicated stereotactic linear accelerator. Couch top model was created within the TPS using CT simulation images of the kVue Calpyso‐compatible couchtop (with rails). Verification measurements were compared to TPS dose prediction for different energies (6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF) and rail configurations (rails in and rails out) using: 1) central axis point‐dose measurements with pinpoint chamber in water‐equivalent phantom at 42 gantry angles for various field sizes (); and 2) Gafchromic EBT3 film parallel to beam in acrylic slab to assess changes in surface and percent depth doses in PA geometry. To assess sensitivity of delivered dose to variations in patient lateral position, measurements at central axis using the pinpoint chamber geometry were taken at lateral couch displacements of 2, 5, and 10 mm for 6 MV FFF. The maximum percent difference for point‐dose measurements was 3.24% (6 MV FFF) and 2.30% (10 MV FFF). The average percent difference for point‐dose measurements was less than 1.10% for all beam energies and rail geometries. The maximum percent difference between calculated and measured dose can be as large as 13.0% if no couch model is used for dose calculation. The presence of the couch structures also impacts surface dose and PDD, which was evaluated with Gafchromic film measurements. The upstream shift in the depth of dose maximum (dmax) was found to be 10.5 mm for 6 MV FFF and 5.5 mm for 10 MV FFF for ‘Rails In’ configuration. Transmission of the treatment beam through the couch results in an increase in surface dose (absolute percentage) of approximately 50% for both photon energies (6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF). The largest sensitivity to lateral shifts occurred at the lateral boundary of the rail structures. The mean magnitude (standard deviation) of the deviation between shifted and centered measurements over all field sizes tested was 0.61% (0.61%) for 2 mm shifts, 0.46% (0.67%) for 5 mm shifts, and 0.86% (1.46%) for 10 mm shifts.PACS numbers: 87.56.‐v, 87.56.Da, 87.56.Fc
Quality control of CT systems by automated monitoring of key performance indicators: a two‐year study
Authors: Nowik Patrik , Bujila Robert , Poludniowski Gavin , Fransson Annette 
Published: February 2017

The purpose of this study was to develop a method of performing routine periodical quality controls (QC) of CT systems by automatically analyzing key performance indicators (KPIs), obtainable from images of manufacturers' quality assurance (QA) phantoms. A KPI pertains to a measurable or determinable QC parameter that is influenced by other underlying fundamental QC parameters. The established KPIs are based on relationships between existing QC parameters used in the annual testing program of CT scanners at the Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. The KPIs include positioning, image noise, uniformity, homogeneity, the CT number of water, and the CT number of air. An application (MonitorCT) was developed to automatically evaluate phantom images in terms of the established KPIs. The developed methodology has been used for two years in clinical routine, where CT technologists perform daily scans of the manufacturer's QA phantom and automatically send the images to MonitorCT for KPI evaluation. In the cases where results were out of tolerance, actions could be initiated in less than 10 min. 900 QC scans from two CT scanners have been collected and analyzed over the two‐year period that MonitorCT has been active. Two types of errors have been registered in this period: a ring artifact was discovered with the image noise test, and a calibration error was detected multiple times with the CT number test. In both cases, results were outside the tolerances defined for MonitorCT, as well as by the vendor. Automated monitoring of KPIs is a powerful tool that can be used to supplement established QC methodologies. Medical physicists and other professionals concerned with the performance of a CT system will, using such methods, have access to comprehensive data on the current and historical (trend) status of the system such that swift actions can be taken in order to ensure the quality of the CT examinations, patient safety, and minimal disruption of servicePACS numbers: 87.57.C‐, 87.57.N‐, 87.57.Q‐
Dosimetric comparison of Acuros XB with collapsed cone convolution/superposition and anisotropic analytic algorithm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of thoracic spinal metastases
Authors: Zhen Heming , Hrycushko Brian , Lee Huichen , Timmerman Robert , Pompoš Arnold , Stojadinovic Strahinja , Foster Ryan , Jiang Steve B. , Solberg Timothy , Gu Xuejun 
Published: February 2017

The aim of this study is to compare the recent Eclipse Acuros XB (AXB) dose calculation engine with the Pinnacle collapsed cone convolution/superposition (CCC) dose calculation algorithm and the Eclipse anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) treatment planning of thoracic spinal (T‐spine) metastases using IMRT and VMAT delivery techniques. The three commissioned dose engines (CCC, AAA, and AXB) were validated with ion chamber and EBT2 film measurements utilizing a heterogeneous slab‐geometry water phantom and an anthropomorphic phantom. Step‐and‐shoot IMRT and VMAT treatment plans were developed and optimized for eight patients in Pinnacle, following our institutional SAbR protocol for spinal metastases. The CCC algorithm, with heterogeneity corrections, was used for dose calculations. These plans were then exported to Eclipse and recalculated using the AAA and AXB dose calculation algorithms. Various dosimetric parameters calculated with CCC and AAA were compared to that of the AXB calculations. In regions receiving above 50% of prescription dose, the calculated CCC mean dose is 3.1%–4.1% higher than that of AXB calculations for IMRT plans and 2.8%–3.5% higher for VMAT plans, while the calculated AAA mean dose is 1.5%–2.4% lower for IMRT and 1.2%–1.6% lower for VMAT. Statistically significant differences () were observed for most GTV and PTV indices between the CCC and AXB calculations for IMRT and VMAT, while differences between the AAA and AXB calculations were not statistically significant. For T‐spine SAbR treatment planning, the CCC calculations give a statistically significant overestimation of target dose compared to AXB. AAA underestimates target dose with no statistical significance compared to AXB. Further study is needed to determine the clinical impact of these findings.PACS number: 87.55.D‐, 87.53.Ly
Comparison of measured Varian Clinac 21EX and TrueBeam accelerator electron field characteristics
Authors: Lloyd Samantha A.M. , Zavgorodni Sergei , Gagne Isabelle M. 
Published: February 2017

Dosimetric comparisons of radiation fields produced by Varian's newest linear accelerator, the TrueBeam, with those produced by older Varian accelerators are of interest from both practical and research standpoints. While photon fields have been compared in the literature, similar comparisons of electron fields have not yet been reported. In this work, electron fields produced by the TrueBeam are compared with those produced by Varian's Clinac 21EX accelerator. Diode measurements were taken of fields shaped with electron applicators and delivered at 100 cm SSD, as well as those shaped with photon MLCs without applicators and delivered at 70 cm SSD for field sizes ranging from to at energies between 6 and 20 MeV. Additionally, EBT2 and EBT3 radio‐chromic film measurements were taken of an MLC‐shaped aperture with closed leaf pairs delivered at 70 cm SSD using 6 and 20 MeV electrons. The 6 MeV fields produced by the TrueBeam and Clinac 21EX were found to be almost indistinguishable. At higher energies, TrueBeam fields shaped by electron applicators were generally flatter and had less photon contamination compared to the Clinac 21EX. Differences in PDDs and profiles fell within 3% and 3 mm for the majority of measurements. The most notable differences for open fields occurred in the profile shoulders for the largest applicator field sizes. In these cases, the TrueBeam and Clinac 21EX data differed by as much as 8%. Our data indicate that an accurate electron beam model of the Clinac 21EX could be used as a starting point to simulate electron fields that are dosimetrically equivalent to those produced by the TrueBeam. Given that the Clinac 21EX shares head geometry with Varian's iX, Trilogy, and Novalis TX accelerators, our findings should also be applicable to these machines.PACS number: 87.56.bd
Effects of changing modulation and pitch parameters on tomotherapy delivery quality assurance plans
Authors: Binny Diana , Lancaster Craig M. , Harris Selina , Sylvander Steven R. 
Published: February 2017

This study was aimed at investigating delivery quality assurance (DQA) discrepancies observed for helical tomotherapy plans. A selection of tomotherapy plans that initially failed the DQA process was chosen for this investigation. These plans failed the fluence analysis as assessed using gamma criteria (3%, 3 mm) with radiographic film. Each of these plans was modified (keeping the planning constraints the same), beamlets rebatched and reoptimized. By increasing and decreasing the modulation factor, the fluence in a circumferential plane as measured with a diode array was assessed. A subset of these plans was investigated using varied pitch values. Metrics for each plan that were examined were point doses, fluences, leaf opening times, planned leaf sinograms, and uniformity indices. In order to ensure that the treatment constraints remained the same, the dose‐volume histograms (DVHs) of all the modulated plans were compared to the original plan. It was observed that a large increase in the modulation factor did not significantly improve DVH uniformity, but reduced the gamma analysis pass rate. This also increased the treatment delivery time by slowing down the gantry rotation speed which then increases the maximum to mean non‐zero leaf open time ratio. Increasing and decreasing the pitch value did not substantially change treatment time, but the delivery accuracy was adversely affected. This may be due to many other factors, such as the complexity of the treatment plan and site. Patient sites included in this study were head and neck, right breast, prostate, abdomen, adrenal, and brain. The impact of leaf timing inaccuracies on plans was greater with higher modulation factors. Point‐dose measurements were seen to be less susceptible to changes in pitch and modulation factors. The initial modulation factor used by the optimizer, such that the TPS generated ‘actual’ modulation factor within the range of 1.4 to 2.5, resulted in an improved deliverable plan.PACS number: 87.55.‐x, 87.55.Qr, 87.55.D‐
Dosimetric impact of orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O‐MAR) on spine SBRT patients
Authors: Shen Zhilei Liu , Xia Ping , Klahr Paul , Djemil Toufik 
Published: February 2017

The dosimetric impact of orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O‐MAR) on spine SBRT patients has not been comprehensively studied, particularly with spinal prostheses in high‐dose gradient regions. Using both phantom and patient datasets, we investigated dosimetric effects of O‐MAR in combination of various metal locations and dose calculation algorithms. A physical phantom, with and without a titanium insert, was scanned. A clinical patient plan was applied to the artifact‐free reference, non‐O‐MAR, and O‐MAR phantom images with the titanium located either inside or outside of the tumor. Subsequently, five clinical patient plans were calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo (iPlan) on non‐O‐MAR and O‐MAR patient images using an extended CT‐density table. The dose differences for phantom plans and patient plans were analyzed using dose distributions, dose‐volume histograms (DVHs), gamma index, and selected dosimetric endpoints. From both phantom plans and patient plans, O‐MAR did not affect dose distributions and DVHs while minimizing metal artifacts. Among patient plans, we found that, when the same dose calculation method was used, the difference in the dosimetric endpoints between non‐O‐MAR and O‐MAR datasets were small. In conclusion, for spine SBRT patients with spinal prostheses, O‐MAR image reconstruction does not affect dose calculation accuracy while minimizing metal artifacts. Therefore, O‐MAR images can be safely used for clinical spine SBRT treatment planning.PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.55.K‐, 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.cp
Late radiation toxicity in Hodgkin lymphoma patients: proton therapy's potential
Authors: Toltz Allison , Shin Naomi , Mitrou Ellis , Laude Cecile , Freeman Carolyn R. , Seuntjens Jan , Parker William , Roberge David 
Published: February 2017

In 2010, all young patients treated for intrathoracic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) at one of 10 radiotherapy centers in the province of Quebec received 3D conformal photon therapy. These patients may now be at risk for late effects of their treatment, notably secondary malignancies and cardiac toxicity. We hypothesized that more complex radiotherapy, including intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and possibly IMRT (in the form of helical tomotherapy (HT)), could benefit these patients. With institutional review board approval at 10 institutions, all treatment plans for patients under the age of 30 treated for HL during a six‐month consecutive period of 2010 were retrieved. Twenty‐six patients were identified, and after excluding patients with extrathoracic radiation or treatment of recurrence, 20 patients were replanned for HT and IMPT. Neutron dose for IMPT plans was estimated from published measurements. The relative seriality model was used to predict excess risk of cardiac mortality. A modified linear quadratic model was used to predict the excess absolute risk for induction of lung cancer and, in female patients, breast cancer. Model parameters were derived from published data. Predicted risk for cardiac mortality was similar among the three treatment techniques (absolute excess risk of cardiac mortality was not reduced for HT or IMPT () as compared to 3D CRT). Predicted risks were increased for HT and reduced for IMPT for secondary lung cancer () and breast cancers () as compared to 3D CRT.PACS numbers: 87.55.dh, 87.55.dk