bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Idiotype vaccine therapy (BiovaxID) in follicular lymphoma in first complete remission: Phase III clinical trial results
Authors: Schuster S. J. , Neelapu S. S. , Gause B. L. , Muggia F. M. , Gockerman J. P. , Sotomayor E. M. , Winter J. N. , Flowers C. R. , Stergiou A. M. , Kwak L. W. 
Published: February 2017

2 Background: In previous trials, tumor-specific purified idiotype (Id) protein conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) administered with granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) induced follicular lymphoma (FL)-specific immune responses and molecular remissions (Nat Med. 1999;5:1171–7). Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter phase III study of patient-specific autologous tumor-derived Id vaccine in advanced stage previously untreated FL patients (pts) with a lymph node adequate for vaccine production (≥ 2cm). Pts achieving complete response (CR) or complete response unconfirmed (CRu) after chemotherapy (PACE: prednisone, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) were stratified by International Prognostic Index risk group and randomized 2:1 to receive either vaccination with Id-KLH/GM-CSF or control (KLH/GM-CSF). The primary endpoint was disease free survival. Results: 234 pts were enrolled; 177 (76%) achieved CR/CRu and were randomized. Of 177 randomized pts, 117 maintained CR/CRu ≥ 6 mo per protocol requirement and then received at least one dose of vaccine, 55 relapsed before vaccination, 4 were vaccine manufacturing failures, and 1 violated protocol. Pts who received ≥ one vaccine dose constituted the modified intent-to-treat population for determination of efficacy. 76 pts received Id-KLH/GM-CSF and 41 pts received the control (KHL/GM-CSF). No serious adverse events were attributed to Id vaccination. At a median follow-up of 56.6 mo (range 12.6 –89.3 mo), median time to relapse after randomization for the Id-KLH/GM-CSF arm was 44.2 mo, versus 30.6 mo for the control arm (p = 0.045; HR = 1.6). Conclusions: Id vaccination after a chemotherapy-induced remission of ≥ 6 mo prolongs remission duration in pts with FL. Compared to other phase III Id vaccine trials, the positive outcome of this study may reflect application of Id vaccine in pts in CR/CRu or use of hybridomas to produce Id. Genomic and immune response analyses are planned on residual autologous tumor and blood samples. Additional studies of this patient-specific vaccine in FL pts pretreated with anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy are indicated. [Table: see text]
Cumulative risk for a false-positive test using low-dose computed tomography in lung cancer screening
Authors: Croswell J. M. , Baker S. G. , Marcus P. M. , Clapp J. D. , Kramer B. S. 
Published: February 2017

CRA1502 Background: Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been promoted as the best hope for curing lung cancer. However, cumulative false-positive (FP) rates have never been formally reported. We quantified the cumulative risk of receiving ≥1 FP test for individuals in a lung cancer screening program with 2 annual screens. Methods: Prior to the ongoing National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), a definitive randomized controlled trial of LDCT versus single-view chest xray (CXR), a randomized controlled feasibility trial was conducted at six NLST centers. Participants (55–74 years at entry, current or former smokers, and ≥ 30 pack/year smoking history) were offered a baseline LDCT (N = 1,610) or CXR (N = 1,580), and one repeat annual screen, and were followed for 1 year after their final screen. Participants who received at least one screening exam were eligible for this analysis. Exclusion criteria included chest CT in the past 24 months or history of lung cancer. A positive screen was any noncalcified nodule ≥ 4mm or other radiographic finding deemed suspicious for cancer. A FP was a positive screen with: 1) a completed negative work-up, or 2) ≥ 12 months follow-up with no cancer diagnosis. Results: Using a Kaplan-Meier analysis, an individual's cumulative probability of ≥ 1 FP LDCT was 21% (95% CI, 19%–23%) after one screen and 33% (95% CI, 30%–35%) after two. The cumulative probability of ≥ 1 FP CXR was 9% (95% CI, 8%–11%) and 15% (95% CI, 13%–16%) after one and two screens, respectively. On multivariable analysis, higher odds of FP for LDCT were associated with increased participant age (>64 years) (OR 1.34, 95% CI, 1.04–1.73); current versus former smoker status trended toward higher FP odds (OR 1.22, 95% CI, 0.95–1.56). 6.6% of participants with a FP LDCT underwent an invasive diagnostic follow-up procedure; 1.6% had major surgery. 4.2% of participants with a FP CXR underwent an invasive diagnostic follow-up procedure; 1.9% had major surgery. Conclusions: Risks of LDCT FP are substantial after only two annual examinations; the potential resulting economic, psychosocial, and physical burdens of this modality warrant investigation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Preoperative fluorouracil (FU)-based chemoradiation with and without weekly oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: Pathologic response analysis of the Studio Terapia Adiuvante Retto (STAR)-01 randomized phase III trial
Authors: Aschele C. , Pinto C. , Cordio S. , Rosati G. , Tagliagambe A. , Artale S. , Rosetti P. , Lonardi S. , Boni L. , Cionini L. 
Published: February 2017

CRA4008 Background: Oxaliplatin (OXA) enhances the efficacy of FU-based chemotherapy in colon cancer. This randomized phase III trial investigated the effect of adding OXA to preoperative (preop) FU-based pelvic chemoradiation (CRT) in patients (pts) with locally-advanced rectal cancer. Methods: Eligibility required a resectable, biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma within 12 cm from the anal verge with radiological evidence of perirectal fat or lymphnode involvement. Randomization was between infused FU (225 mg/msq/day) concomitant to external-beam pelvic radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions) (arm A) or the same regimen + weekly OXA (60 mg/msq × 6) (Arm B). Surgery was scheduled 6–8 weeks after completing CRT. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. A protocol-planned analysis of local tumor response to preop treatment (secondary end-point) is the object of this report. Results: 747 pts from 41 Italian centers were randomized between 12/2003 and 8/2008 (arm A/B: 379/368). Pretreatment characteristics in arm A/B: median age 63/62 years; male:female 2:1; median distance from anal verge 6 cm; T4 16/14%, N+ 63/65%. Overall grade 3–4 toxicity rates on treated pts (mainly diarrhoea) were 8% and 24% (arm A/B, p<0.001). 96/90% of pts (arm A/B) received > 90% of the planned RT. 82% of Arm B pts had > 5 oxa courses. 358/342 pts (arm A/B) had surgery at a median of 52/53 days from the end of CRT, 14 pts in each arm were not operated (progression 8, death 5, other/unknown 15) and surgery data are not yet available for 19 pts. Pathologic response data analyzed on the randomized population are reported in the table . Conclusions: The addition of weekly OXA to standard FU-based preop CRT significantly increases toxicity without affecting local tumor response. The reduced pathologic M+ rate suggests a potential effect on distant micrometastases. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on efficacy endpoints. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Vandetanib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A randomized, double-blind phase III trial (ZODIAC)
Authors: Herbst R. S. , Sun Y. , Korfee S. , Germonpré P. , Saijo N. , Zhou C. , Wang J. , Langmuir P. , Kennedy S. J. , Johnson B. E. 
Published: February 2017

CRA8003 Background: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of VEGFR, EGFR and RET signaling. Addition of vandetanib to docetaxel (doc) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in a randomized phase II study in patients (pts) with previously treated NSCLC (Heymach et al, JCO, 2007). Methods: The primary objective was to determine whether vandetanib 100 mg/day + doc 75 mg/m2 every 21 days (max 6 cycles) prolonged PFS vs placebo + doc. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), time to deterioration of symptoms (TDS) and safety. Efficacy and safety in females were assessed as a co-primary analysis population. Eligibility criteria included stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, PS 0–1, and previous first-line chemotherapy. Results: Between May 2006 and April 2008, 1,391 pts (mean age, 58 years; 30% female; 25% squamous; 10% brain mets) were randomized to vandetanib + doc (n=694) or placebo + doc (n=697). Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Median duration of follow-up was 12.8 months, with 87% patients progressed and 59% dead. Addition of vandetanib to doc showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS vs doc (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 97.58% CI 0.70–0.90; P<0.001), and a similar advantage in females (HR 0.79; P=0.024). Significant advantages for vandetanib + doc were also seen for ORR (17% vs 10%, P<0.001) and TDS (HR 0.78, P=0.002; FACT-L Lung Cancer Subscale). Overall survival showed a positive trend for vandetanib + doc that was not statistically significant (HR 0.91, 97.52% CI 0.78–1.07; P=0.196). The adverse event (AE) profile was consistent with that previously observed for vandetanib in NSCLC. Common AEs occurring more frequently in the vandetanib arm included diarrhea (42% vs 33%), rash (42% vs 24%) and neutropenia (32% vs 27%). Nausea (23% vs 32%), vomiting (16% vs 21%) and anemia (10% vs 15%) were less frequent in the vandetanib arm. The incidence of protocol-defined QTc prolongation was <2% in pts receiving vandetanib. Conclusions: The study met its primary objective of PFS prolongation with vandetanib + doc vs doc. Vandetanib is the first oral targeted therapy in phase III trials to show significant evidence of clinical benefit when added to standard chemotherapy in NSCLC. [Table: see text]
A phase III multi-institutional randomized study of immunization with the gp100: 209–217(210M) peptide followed by high-dose IL-2 compared with high-dose IL-2 alone in patients with metastatic melanoma
Authors: Schwartzentruber D. J. , Lawson D. , Richards J. , Conry R. M. , Miller D. , Triesman J. , Gailani F. , Riley L. B. , Vena D. , Hwu P. 
Published: February 2017

CRA9011 Background: In a phase II study, 13 (42%) of 31 patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose (HD) IL-2 plus gp100:209–217(210M) peptide experienced objective responses (S.A. Rosenberg, et al, Nature Medicine 4: 321–327, 1998). Other studies showed a lower response rate (RR) but no randomized studies have been done. Methods: A prospective randomized phase III trial was conducted at 21 centers with 185 patients. Eligibility: stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, HLA A0201, no brain metastases, eligible for HD IL-2, and no previous HD IL-2 or gp100:209–217(210M). Arm 1 received HD IL-2 alone (720,000 IU/kg/dose) and Arm 2 gp100:209–217(210M) peptide + Montanide ISA followed by HD IL-2. The primary objective was clinical response. Secondary objectives were toxicity, disease free/progression free survival, immunologic response and quality of life. Central HLA typing, pathology review, and blinded response assessment were done at the NIH. Central data monitoring was done by The EMMES Corp. and a Data Safety Monitoring Board. Results: Numbers of patients enrolled, treated, and evaluable for response in Arm 1 were 94, 93, and 93 respectively; in Arm 2 91, 86, and 86. Toxicities were consistent with HD IL-2 ± vaccine. Investigator assessed RR showed significant improvement in overall RR for Arm 2=22.1% vs 9.7% (P=0.0223, Chi-Square) and progression free survival (PFS) in favor of Arm 2=2.9 months (1.7–4.5) vs 1.6 (1.5–1.8) (P=0.0101). Median overall survival favors Arm 2=17.6 months (11.8–26.6) vs 12.8 (8.7–16.3) (P=0.0964). Blinded response review is ongoing. Conclusions: RR and PFS were superior with peptide vaccine and HD IL-2 compared to HD IL-2 alone. This represents the first evidence of clinical benefit of vaccination in patients with melanoma. [Table: see text]
Randomized multicenter phase III trial comparing two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) regimens (RT45-Cap versus RT50-Capox) in patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): Results of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2
Authors: Gerard J. , Azria D. , Gourgou-Bourgade S. , Martel-Laffay I. , Hennequin C. , Etienne P. , Vendrely V. , Conroy T. , Francois E. , Montoto-Grillot C. 
Published: February 2017

LBA4007 Background: Following the results of randomized trials FFCD 9203 and EORTC 2291, neoadjuvant CT-RT is considered standard treatment for LARC. The ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 trial was initiated to optimize this regimen. Methods: Pts with T3 or resectable T4 N0–1-2 M0, rectal adenocarcinoma were randomized to arm A: concurrent RT 45Gy/25f/5 weeks (w) + capecitabine (800mg/m2/bid) or arm B: concurrent RT 50Gy/25f/5w + capecitabine (800mg/m2/bid/5/7days) + oxaliplatine 50mg/m2/w. Resection with Total Mesorectum Excision was scheduled 6 weeks after the end of CT-RT. Adjuvant chemotherapy was optional. 590 patients were needed to show an increase in the pathological complete response (Dworak) rate from 11% (arm A) to 20% (arm B). Circumferential positive rectal margin (CRM R1) was defined as the presence of residual cancer cells within 0 to 1 mm from the perirectal surface. Results: This trial closed in 07/2008 after randomization of 598 pts since 11/2005. Patients characteristics of 586 eligible pts were well balanced: male 66%, median age 61 years, 66% low rectum, 87% T3 stage. Data base was locked in March 2009. Results are reported in Table . Conclusions: The RT 50 capox regimen is compatible with surgery in 98% of cases with no increase in postoperative complication. In the RT 50 arm, there is a trend in favour of a higher rate of pathological complete sterilization and lower rate of positive CRM. These data could contribute to design a new standard preoperative regimen for LARC. 50 Gy/25 F/5 weeks combined with concurrent chemotherapy could be proposed as an efficient schedule. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
First results of a phase III multicenter randomized controlled trial of intensity modulated (IMRT) versus conventional radiotherapy (RT) in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT: ISRCTN48243537; CRUK/03/005)
Authors: Nutting C. , A'Hern R. , Rogers M. S. , Sydenham M. A. , Adab F. , Harrington K. , Jefferies S. , Scrase C. , Yap B. K. , Hall E. 
Published: February 2017

LBA6006 Background: Xerostomia is the most common late toxicity of RT to the head and neck. IMRT dose distributions reduce the dose delivered to parotid gland. PARSPORT investigated the role of IMRT in reducing xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer. Methods: The PARSPORT trial compared two radiotherapy delivery methods in the treatment of patients with pharyngeal tumors (T1–4, N0–3, M0). Patients received 65Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks delivered using either CT planned parallel opposed lateral fields or parotid-sparing IMRT. Stratification was by site of tumor and center. The primary endpoint was incidence of LENT-SOMA ≥G2 xerostomia one year after treatment. Secondary endpoints included acute toxicities (CTCAE v3) and other late RTOG and LENT-SOMA radiation toxicities. Proportions of patients with ≥G2 toxicity were compared using exact tests. For secondary endpoints a significance level of 1% was used. Results: 94 patients (47 RT; 47 IMRT) were randomized between 2003 and 2007 from six UK centers. 80 patients had oropharyngeal tumors and 14 hypopharyngeal. Radiotherapy was given as primary treatment in 71 patients and post-operatively in 23. 22 patients had AJCC stage I/II disease. Median follow-up was 31.9 months (IQR: 26.6 –38.8). Twelve month LENT-SOMA ≥G2 xerostomia scores were observed in 74% (25/34) of RT and 40% (15/38) of IMRT patients (p=0.005). Corresponding values at 18 months were 71% (15/21) and 29% (9/31) (p=0.004). On the RTOG scale, 12 month ≥G2 xerostomia was reported in 64% (21/33) RT vs 41% (15/37) IMRT patients (p=0.06). The 18 month incidence was 81% 17/21 RT vs 20% (6/30) IMRT (p<0.001). Acute radiotherapy related ≥G2 fatigue was more prevalent in the IMRT group (76% vs 41% p=0.001). No differences in acute mucositis or pain scores were seen. At 12 months, no statistically significant differences were seen in other late toxicities. No differences were observed between overall survival and locoregional control rates. Conclusions: Sparing the salivary glands through use of IMRT significantly reduces the incidence of xerostomia in patients with pharyngeal tumors. [Table: see text]
Adjuvant radiotherapy and regional lymph node field control in melanoma patients after lymphadenectomy: Results of an intergroup randomized trial (ANZMTG 01.02/TROG 02.01)
Authors: Henderson M. A. , Burmeister B. , Thompson J. F. , Di Iulio J. , Fisher R. , Hong A. , Scolyer R. , Shannon K. , Hoesktra H. , Ainslie J. 
Published: February 2017

LBA9084 Background: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is an option for patients with isolated regional recurrence of melanoma considered to be at high risk of further regional recurrence after lymphadenectomy. This is the first completed study to assess the effects of RT on regional recurrence, survival, morbidity and quality of life (QOL) in these patients. Methods: Multicenter randomized study of patients with isolated regional recurrence at increased risk (>25%) of regional recurrence. Eligibile patients included ≥1 parotid, ≥ 2 cervical or axillary or ≥ 3 groin nodes or extra nodal spread of tumor or maximum metastatic node diameter ≥3cm in neck or axilla or ≥4cm in the groin. Patients were randomized to observation or regional nodal basin RT (48Gy in 20 fractions) after lymphadenectomy. Regional recurrence was the primary end point and morbidity, QOL, patterns of relapse, disease free and overall survival were secondary end points. The target sample size was 220 patients, which would enable a difference in 3 year regional relapse (cumulative incidence) rates of 30% versus 15% to be detected with a power of 80% (using a two sided logrank test at the 5% level of significance). Results: 250 pts were randomized from 16 centers from March 2002 to September 2007. There were 123 in the RT group and 127 in OBS group. 2 pts withdrew consent and 31 were excluded from analysis of the main objective following an independent blinded review of eligibility compliance by two reviewers. 227 pts were available for analysis of the main objective (109 RT, 108 OBS). Median follow-up was 27 mo. There was a statistically significant improvement in lymph node field control with radiotherapy, 20 RT pts and 34 OBS pts relapsed (HR 1.77 1.02–3.08 p=0.041). Median survival times were 2.6 years (RT) and 3.9 years (OBS) p=0.14. Conclusions: Adjuvant RT improved regional control in melanoma patients at high risk of regional relapse after lymphadenectomy. An effect on survival was not demonstrated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
ACOSOG Z0011: A randomized trial of axillary node dissection in women with clinical T1-2 N0 M0 breast cancer who have a positive sentinel node.
Authors: Giuliano A. E. , McCall L. M. , Beitsch P. D. , Whitworth P. W. , Morrow M. , Blumencranz P. W. , Leitch A. M. , Saha S. , Hunt K. , Ballman K. V. 
Published: February 2017

CRA506 Background: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) eliminates the need for axillary dissection (ALND) in patients whose sentinel node (SN) is tumor-free. However, completion ALND remains the gold standard for patients with a tumor-involved sentinel node. ALND achieves regional control, but its effect on survival remains controversial. The main objective of ACOSOG Z0011 was to compare outcomes of patients with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) detected metastasis in SN managed with or without ALND and no axillary irradiation. Methods: Clinically node-negative patients who underwent SN biopsy and had 1 or 2 SN with metastases detected by H&E were randomized to ALND or no further axillary specific treatment. All patients were treated with lumpectomy and opposing tangential field irradiation. Adjuvant systemic therapy was at the discretion of their physicians. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control were evaluated. Results: 446 patients were randomized to SNB alone and 445 to SNB plus ALND. Patients treated with SNB alone were similar to those treated with SNB + ALND with respect to age, tumor size, Bloom-Richardson score, estrogen receptor status, adjuvant systemic therapy, tumor type, and T stage. Patients randomized to SNB alone had a median of two lymph nodes removed whereas patients randomized to ALND had a median of 17 lymph nodes removed. 17.6% of ALND patients had 3 or more involved nodes compared to 5.0% of SNB patients (p < 0.001). Median follow-up is 6.2 years. 5-year in breast recurrence after ALND was 3.7% compared to 2.1% for SNB (p = 0.16) while 5-year nodal recurrence was 0.6% compared to 1.3% (p = 0.44) respectively. The five-year OS for patients undergoing SNB + ALND is 91.9% compared to 92.5% for SNB alone (p = 0.24), and DFS is 82.2% compared to 83.8% respectively (p = 0.13). Conclusions: Despite the widely held belief that ALND improves survival, no significant difference was recognized by this study of SN node-positive women. Although the study closed early because of low accrual/event rate, it is the largest phase III study of ALND for node-positive women, and it demonstrates no trend toward clinical benefit of ALND for patients with limited nodal disease. [Table: see text]
A phase I pharmacokinetic trial of sonic hedgehog (SHH) antagonist GDC-0449 in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory medulloblastoma: A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium study (PBTC 25).
Authors: Gajjar A. J. , Stewart C. F. , Ellison D. W. , Curran T. , Phillips P. , Goldman S. , Packer R. , Kun L. E. , Boyett J. M. , Gilbertson R. J. 
Published: February 2017

CRA9501 Background:Aberrant signaling in SHH pathway is implicated in causing medulloblastoma in approximately 20% of children with this disease. GDC-0449 is an orally active agent that binds to the SMO receptor and prevents downstream signaling through GLI. Preclinical murine models predict efficacy of an SMO antagonist to treat tumors dependent on the SHH pathway. Adult studies have documented the efficacy of this compound against recurrent medulloblastoma and basal cell carcinoma. A phase I pharmacokinetic trial of GDC 0449 was conducted in children with recurrent or refractory medulloblastoma to select, based on safety and pharmacokinetics, one of two dosages to recommend for a pediatric phase II trial. We also used immunonistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) on paraffin-embedded tissue to determine which tumors belonged to the SHH subtype. Methods: GDC 0449 was administered once daily for 28 days dose levels of (1) 85 mg/m2/dose and (2) 170 mg/m2/dose. A course was defined as 28 days in duration. PK analysis was performed during the first course and steady-state concentrations were obtained prior to each subsequent course (day 21). MRI scans of the knees were obtained at baseline and 3 mos to assess abnormalities in bone development. Results: To date 11 eligible patients have been enrolled on the trial (10 males, median age 11.6 years (range 4.4–20.9). All patients were fully evaluable for toxicity. 1 DLT, grade 3 gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase, occurred in a patient enrolled at 170 mg/m2/dose. There were no grade 4 toxicities. The median (range) steady-state day 21 concentration at 85 mg/m2 (n=5) is 10.15 μ M (9.10–18.99 μ M) and at 170 mg/m2 (n=2) is 14.50 μ M (14.43–14.57 μ M). The steady-state GDC-0449 clearance (n=7) is 0.86 (0.44 – 1.17 L/h/m2). At steady state (day 21), the ratio of GDC-0449 CSF to plasma is 1.3%, which is an estimate of the CSF penetration of GDC-0449. Conclusions: GDC 0449 is well-tolerated in children with recurrent or refractory medulloblastoma. The phase I study estimating the recommended phase II dose of GDC 0449 is ongoing; final results including medulloblastoma subgroup data will be presented. [Table: see text]