bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
GIT (Glucose Infusion Test): Polycentric Evaluation of a New Test for Vascular Access Recirculation
Authors: Alloatti S. , Magnasco A. , Bonfant G. , Bonello F. , Ciciani A.M. , Fidelio T. , Filiberti O. , Forneris G. , Martina G. , Robaudo C. , Romano U. , Schelotto C. 
Published: January 2018

Introduction Vascular access recirculation (AR), which is often unacknowledged, remains an important cause of inadequate dialytic dose. The glucose infusion test (GIT) is a new method for detecting and quantifying AR. This paper reports on a polycentric evaluation of the new test and a comparison with the classical Urea-test (UT). Methods GIT protocol comprises withdrawal from the arterial port (sample A), injection into the venous drip chamber of 1 g glucose in 4 seconds, withdrawal from the arterial port (sample B) continuously from 13 to 17 seconds. Glucose is determined on A and B by a reflectance photometer. If B = A then there is no recirculation. If B exceeds A by at least 20 mg/dl there is recirculation. AR quantification: AR% = (B-A) / 20. GIT was performed on 623 patients from eleven dialysis centers to screen the patients for AR. Subsequently, GIT and Urea-test (UT) were compared in 189 paired tests. The reproducibility of GIT and UT was studied in 28 paired tests performed in sequence. Results The screening test by GIT was positive in 68 cases (11 %). The majority of positivities was found in central venous catheters (CVC, 27/50 cases, 54 %), whereas only 7 % of artero-venous fistulas (AVF) were positive. In the CVC group, Tesio catheters were more frequently positive compared to Dual Lumen Catheters (64 % vs. 29 %). The comparison GIT – UT showed that results matched in 162 tests (79 negative and 83 positive both by GIT and UT), showing that on the grounds of UT, GIT has high sensitivity and specificity. In 27 tests GIT was positive, but UT negative. This disagreement is due to the different minimal limit of detection, 1 % for GIT and 5% for UT. The reproducibility was greater with GIT than with UT with a lower D % (respectively −0.6 ± 2.5 and −0.4 ± 6.1 %, p<0.001) and a lower coefficient of variation (17 vs 33 %). Conclusions The screening of 623 patients by GIT confirmed that AR in AVF is normally absent, whereas an unexpectedly high frequency of moderate AR in CVC was found. The GIT-UT comparison showed that the new test is simple and immediate, and gives results with higher accuracy, sensitivity and reproducibility than UT.
Indication for the use of Central Venous Catheters as Vascular Access for Hemodialysis
Authors: Baracetti S. 
Published: January 2018

Adequate treatment for uremic patients on hemodialysis requires valid and lasting access to central vessels. The Central Venous Catheter (CVC) as a mean of immediate access is indispensable in all acute cases where it has not been possible to prepare an AVF in time and when the peripheral vascularization is highly compromised. We present our investigation on the best access route to central vessels and the selection of the type of catheters to adopt in different conditions. On the basis of complications arising during the catheter life especially as permanent access, it seems to us that the right internal jugular catheterization with the 2 Tesio catheters Kit is the more useful and less dangerous catheterization.
Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation and Endocavitary Electrocardiography Placement of Internal Jugular Vein Catheters in Uremic Patients: The Importance of Routine Chest X-Ray Evaluation
Authors: Cavatorta F. , Zollo A. , Galli S. , Mij M. , Dolla D. 
Published: January 2018

The NKF-DOQI guidelines recommend performing chest-X-ray(CXR) after subclavian and internal jugular vein insertion prior to catheter use. This is to exclude complications such as a pneumothorax before starting hemodialysis. Indication of a central venous dialysis catheter was based on the historic use of the subclavian vein for placement of these catheters and upon the reported incidence of pneumothorax after this approach of between 1% to 12.4%. In contrast, the incidence of these complications using the internal jugular vein (IJV) is much lower (< 1%). We report our experience in ultrasound-guided cannulation of the right IJV for dialysis vascular access in 527 uremic patients and central catheter placement by endocavitary electrocardiography (EC-ECG). Fluoroscopy was not utilized. In the first hundred cases, all patients underwent CXR. Subsequently, because of total absence of complications and catheter tip malpositioning, the CXR control was carried out only in selected cases (repeated cannulation of the jugular vein or absence of P wave). We believe that only in selected cases should a pCXR be performed before starting hemodialysis sessions, and that our method using the right IJV, ultrasound-guided puncture of the vessel, and catheter placement by EC-ECG is a safe and simple technique that avoids the need for CXR control.
Central Venous Catheter Placement in Hemodialysis: Evaluation of Electrocardiography using a Guide-Wire
Authors: Cavatorta F. , Zollo A. , Galli S. , Dionisio P. 
Published: January 2018

Internal jugular vein cannulation has become a routine and clinically important aspect of medical care in hemodialysis patients. Mismanagement in the location of a central venous catheter may occur in up to 20% of cases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the utility of endocavitary electrocardiography in right internal jugular vein placement of central venous catheters. We examined 327 central venous catheterizations performed in two Dialysis Units; all catheters were positioned using intra-atrial ECG monitoring by guide-wire and after, by catheter filled with NaCl solution. EC-ECG via guide-wire was successful on 321 occasions (98.1%). Correct placement of the catheter was confirmed by EC-ECG via catheter in each case, and by plain chest-X-ray only in the first hundred cases. In 314 patients (98.1%), insertion of the catheter was successful at the first attempt. In 6 catheterizations, no atrial trace was obtained due to atrial fibrillation in 4 cases, and in 2 cases technical error and guide-wire looping into a right jugular vein. Complications as a direct result of guide-wire or catheter placement were not observed. In our opinion this method can be used safely and makes radiological control usually unnecessary.
The Placement of Central Venous Catheters in Hemodialysis: Role of the Endocavitary Electrocardiographic Trace. Case Reports and Literature Review
Authors: Dionisio P. , Cavatorta F. , Zollo A. , Valenti M. , Chiappini N. , Bajardi P. 
Published: January 2018

At present, the placement of a central venous catheter is becoming more and more a routine procedure nevertheless it involves different operators in fields such as oncology, nutrition, nephrology, and emergency medicine. It is well known that complications in the placement of CVC may occur in up to 20% of cases. One fifth of the catheters may result to be misplaced either in the internal omolateral jugular vein or in the innominate vein or in the controlateral brachiocephalic veins and usually a chest radiogram is necessary to evaluate its location. On the basis of 10 years of experience including more than 1,000 CVC placements, we now believe that endocavitary electrocardiography EC-ECG, initially studied and applied by Dr. Serafini, constitutes the best technique, more secure and more comfortable for the patient, to verify the position of the tip of a CVC. The technique EC-ECG, very simple and secure, utilizes the CVC as an endocavitary electrode. This is connected to a standard electrocardiograph, the same one to which the patient is connected during the placement of the CVC, and provides, in derivation V1 or D3, an electrocardiographic pattern extremely sensitive to the position of the catheter tip. From December 1991 to December 2000, this technique has been used successfully in our departments of nephrology and applied to 1,139 patients that needed a CVC for hemodialysis. EC-ECG and a standard chest radiogram controlled the first 100 CVC we placed and in the other 1,039 cases, the control was made by EC-ECG alone. Only in 31 patients (2.7% of all cases), due to arrhythmia, the technique EC-ECG was not utilized. According to our experience, the procedure EC-ECG is an extremely reliable technique, sensitive and specific in 100% of cases, easy for the operator to perform, comfortable for patient. It doesn't need additional time to be performed and eliminates the need of taking a chest radiogram that up to now was considered indispensable in order to verify the position of the catheter tip. In this manner serious complications such as pneumothorax, and haemothorax that can complicate the placement of a CVC can also be avoided. Based on our experience, we now believe that this technique, that today has a large application in nephrology, oncology, clinical nutrition and in various branches of general medicine whenever the placement of a CVC is required, should be considered as a possible new guide line in controlling the placement of a CVC together with a chest X-ray when it is necessary.
Subcutaneous Implantation of the LifeSite® Hemodialysis Access System in the Femoral Vein
Authors: Ross J. 
Published: January 2018

Cannulation of the femoral vein is often necessary to provide immediate vascular access for hemodialysis patients in whom a functional permanent access is not available or in patients who have exhausted other access options. Femoral placement of dialysis catheters is typically short term - days, not months - and is associated with high rates of infection, occlusion, recirculation and intervention as well as a high risk of catheter dislodgment. A new, fully subcutaneous vascular access device - the LifeSite®, Hemodialysis Access System (Vasca, Inc., Tewksbury, MA) - has demonstrated better safety and efficacy profiles than a standard tunneled dialysis catheter in clinical trails that evaluated placement within the thoracic veins. The case reported here extends the use of the LifeSite® System to femoral placement in a patient with multiple failed arteriovenous accesses and dialysis catheters subsequent to central venous stenosis. The LifeSite® System was successfully implanted in the patient's left femoral vein and has served the patient for 4 months with no infections or complications requiring intervention, delivering flow rates >400–450 ml/minute for high-flux, dual-needle hemodialysis. These initial results suggest that the LifeSite® Hemodialysis Access System represents a new, safe and effective vascular access option in patients with limited access choices due to failed access in the upper extremities, central venous stenosis, or other vascular inadequacies.
Factors Influencing Permanent Catheter Performance
Authors: Mandolfo S. , Galli F. , Costa S. , Ravani P. , Gaggia P. , Imbasciati E. 
Published: January 2018

Permanent dual lumen catheters (PDLC) provide an alternative vascular access in patients considered unsuitable for arteriovenous fistula, graft or peritoneal dialysis. However, the use of PDLC is often complicated by inadequate blood flow. The aim of this study was to identify catheter dysfunctions. We studied prospectively 57 chronic hemodialyzed patients, 73±11 years of age, with PDLC for 18±14 (1–48) months. Catheters were tunneled in silicone (MedComp Tesio n= 40) or in polyurethane (Permcath Quinton n = 11, GamCath Gambro n = 6) in left or right internal jugular (n = 49), in left or right subclavian (n = 3) and in right femoral vein (n = 5). We studied the blood viscosity indices (hematocrit, total protein, cholesterol and triglycerides), catheter intra-dialytic parameters (pre-pump and venous pressure), localization of the catheter tip (superior vena cava = SVC, right atrium = RA, inferior vena cava = IVC), blood pressure before and after hemodialysis during the 3 last dialyses, use of anticoagulant (ACT) or antiaggregant therapy (AAT) and previous infectious episodes. The mean blood flow was 269±37 ml/min (median 280 ml/min). The patients were divided according to the median value into groups I (Qb < 280, n = 28) and group II (Qb > 280, n =29). Results: Blood viscosity, patients’ mean arterial pressure and venous catheter line pressure did not differ between the two groups. Pre-pump pressure, at the start and at the end of treatment, was higher in group I. ACT, AAT and previous infectious episodes could not explain the low-performance. Blood flows of catheters localized in RA, SVC, and in IVC were respectively 287±20, 268±39, 244±27 ml/min. In the first case the Qb was significantly higher than IVC (p = 0.03) and SVC (p = 0.04). In conclusion, the most important factor influencing blood flow rates seems to be the position of the catheter tip in the venous system. The best blood flows were found in catheters with the tip localized in the right cardiac cavities, while PLDC placed in inferior vena cava showed lower blood flow.
Central Venous Access in Pediatric Patients
Authors: Fusaro F. , Scarpa M.G. , Piccolo R. Lo , Zanon G.F. 
Published: January 2018

Occlusion of traditional sites for central venous cannulation is a challenging problem in patients that require a permanent central venous line for chronic administration of nutrients or drugs. In rare cases, extensive central venous thrombosis of the superior and inferior vena cava may preclude catheterization, and uncommon routes should be used. We describe our approach for placement of chronic central venous lines in two pediatric patients with short bowel syndrome and extensive caval occlusion.
Amplatzer Vascular Plug for Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Access Occlusion: Initial Experience
Authors: Bui J.T. , Gaba R.C. , Knuttinen M.G. , West D.L. , Owens C.A. 
Published: January 2018

Purpose The Amplatzer Vascular Plug (AVP; AGA Medical, Golden Valley, MN) is a recently developed self-expanding metallic device indicated for peripheral vascular embolizations. Herein, we describe use of this device in the treatment of vascular complications related to arteriovenous hemodialysis fistulas and grafts. Materials and methods This HIPAA compliant retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board with informed consent waived. Six patients with problematic arteriovenous access underwent access occlusion using the AVP. Procedure indications included vascular steal syndrome in five patients, and enlarging vascular aneurysms in one patient. Contraindications for surgical correction were determined by the referring surgeon. AVP embolizations were performed using devices oversized by 50% introduced through vascular sheaths positioned within vein segments just beyond the arteriovenous anastomoses. Noninvasive evaluation of the involved extremity was performed pre- and post-embolization in addition to clinical follow-up examinations. Measured outcomes included success of angiographic occlusion, improvement in distal arterial flow, AVP number, AVP diameter, time to access occlusion, and clinical symptomatic improvement. Results Technical success was 100%, with complete arteriovenous access occlusion accomplished in all cases, with an average of 1.5 AVPs used per patient. Mean time to access occlusion was 19.3 minutes. Angiographic improvement in distal arterial flow was immediately evident and resolution of clinical symptoms occurred in all patients, with mean long-term follow-up of 16 months. No procedure-related complications were encountered. Conclusion The Amplatzer Vascular Plug provides a minimally invasive and efficacious method for embolization of problematic arteriovenous hemodialysis access.
The Use of a New Kind of Low Profile Retractor for Arteriovenous Fistula Procedure Simplifies and Speeds up the Intervention
Authors: Lo Monte A.I. , Amato G. , Damiano G. , Gioviale M.C. , Lombardo C. , Romano G. , Romano M. 
Published: January 2018

Purpose The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of a new kind of disposable surgical retractor in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) procedures in order to achieve an easier, faster and safer surgical intervention. Methods Between January and June 2008, 22 AVF procedures were performed using the 3PAWS ReeTrakttrade; (Insightra Inc. - Irvine, Ca., USA) a self-retaining, low profile retractor. An equivalent patient sample, in which an AVF was performed using conventional retraction devices, was considered for comparison of the intra- and post-operative results. Results In all of the 22 AVF procedures performed, the ReeTrakt™ system has simplified the performance of the surgical team. The retractors were very easy to place. The view of the operating field was always optimal. The introduction of the surgical instruments was at all times extremely easy and unrestricted. We also noted a reduction in the operating time (from an average of 67 min in controls to 43 min). There were no intraoperative complications. No post-operative complications related to the use of this kind of device occurred. Conversely, the amount of intra- and post-operative complications in the control group managed with conventional retraction devices was marginally higher than in the ReeTrakt™ patient group. Conclusion The ReeTrakt™ system is a very simple and useful low profile retractor for AVF procedures. Its ultra low profile allows a much improved view of the operating field, an unhindered insertion of the surgical instruments and a shortening of intervention time, avoiding the problems which arise as a result of standard retractors typically used during this kind of procedure. Due to absolute perpendicular retraction it offers a highly atraumatic performance, avoiding swelling and marks on the insertion sites. Therefore, in our opinion, it has the potential to reduce the risk of wound oedema, hematomas or infection associated with the AVF procedure. This is important as many patients are elderly with fragile tissues.
Measurement of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) in Hemodialysis Patients with Heparin-Locked Central venous Catheters: Evaluation of a Novel Blood Sampling Method
Authors: Rioux Jean-Philippe , De Bortoli Bruno , Quérin Serge , Déziel Clément , Troyanov Stéphan , Madore François 
Published: January 2018

Background Accurate measurement of the international normalized ratio (INR) may be difficult in hemodialysis (HD) patients with heparin-locked central catheters. Blood contamination with locking solutions may interfere with INR measurement when samples are collected directly from the catheter. Methods The aim of our study was to evaluate a novel sampling method for the measurement of INR in HD patients with heparin-locked central catheters. This novel method consists of measuring the INR directly from the dialysis circuit (arterial bloodline sample port) after 1 hr of treatment regardless of heparin administration during dialysis. We compared this method to the gold standard (peripheral venipuncture prior to dialysis) using the paired t-test. We included 30 patients (23 with warfarin therapy and 7 without). Results INRs obtained using the novel sampling method were only minimally overestimated compared to venipuncture values (mean INR overestimation: 0.2 +/- 0.2). This overestimation was not clinically significant and did not lead to changes in warfarin prescription for any of the patients. Correlation tests confirmed the influence of heparin administration on INR overestimation (R=0.4; p=0.05). This influence was present mostly among patients receiving more than 100 Units/kg of heparin during their treatment. Conclusion This novel sampling technique provides a convenient and simple method of monitoring INR among HD patients.
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Depth of Maximal Insertion Between Anterograde Single-Balloon Versus Spiral Enteroscopy
Authors: Moran Robert A , Barola Sindhu , Law Joanna K , Amateau Stuart K , Rolshud Daniil , Corless Erin , Kiswani Vandhana , Singh Vikesh K , Kalloo Anthony N , Khashab Mouen A , Marie Lennon Anne , Okolo Patrick I , Kumbhari Vivek 
Published: January 2018

Background: Three device-assisted deep endoscopic platforms presently exist and are available for clinical use: double-balloon enteroscopy, single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE), and spiral enteroscopy (SE). In a retrospective study, SE was associated with a greater depth of maximal insertion (DMI) with similar diagnostic yields and procedure time as compared with SBE. Aims: This was a prospective, randomized comparison of SE and SBE with respect to DMI, diagnostic yield, procedure time, and rate of adverse events. Methods: Patients were prospectively randomized to undergo either anterograde SE or SBE. Patient demographics, indication for procedure, DMI, procedure time, therapeutic procedure time, adverse event, diagnostic findings, and therapeutic interventions were prospectively recorded. The primary outcome was DMI. Secondary outcomes included: procedure time; diagnostic yield; therapeutic yield and adverse event rates. Results: During the study period, 30 patients underwent deep enteroscopy (SE 13, SBE 17). The most common indication was gastrointestinal bleeding in both groups. There was no significant difference in the DMI between SE and SBE (330.0 ± 88.2 cm vs 285.3 ± 80.8 cm, P = .16). There was no difference between SE and SBE in procedure time (37.0 ± 10.5 vs 38.3 ± 12.4, P = .76), diagnostic yield (SE = 9 [69%] vs SBE = 7 [41%], P = .16), or therapeutic yield (SE = 6 [46%] vs SBE = 4 [24%], P = .26). There were no major adverse events in either group. Conclusions: Spiral enteroscopy and SBE are similar with respect to DMI, diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield, procedure time, and rate of adverse events. Small numbers prevent giving a definitive judgment and future adequately powered prospective study is required to confirm these findings.
Psychological determinants of job retention in multiple sclerosis
Authors: Ford Helen L , Wicks Charlotte R , Stroud Amanda , Tennant Alan 
Published: January 2018

Background: Maintaining paid work is a key issue for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Different factors, including psychological attributes, can influence job retention. Understanding their role should inform potential interventions to help PwMS retain employment. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the key factors which improve job retention in an employed cohort of PwMS. Methods: This three-year longitudinal study used validated self-completed measures of physical and psychological factors at four time points over 28 months. Results: Of 208 employed PwMS, just over 1 in 10 was no longer working at the end of the study. Three variables were predictive of continuing employment; low ‘work instability’ at baseline increased the odds of job retention by a factor of 12.76; high levels of self-efficacy by a factor of 4.66 and being less than 50 years of age increased the odds of job retention by a factor of 3.90. Path analysis demonstrated the mediating role of self-efficacy between the physical impact of MS and the level of work instability at exit. Conclusion: Screening for work instability and self-efficacy in a clinical setting followed by appropriate interventions to increase self-efficacy and reduce work instability could aid job retention in MS.