bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Myelofibrosis With Myeloid Metaplasia: Diagnostic Definition and Prognostic Classification for Clinical Studies and Treatment Guidelines
Authors: Barosi Giovanni 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) is a chronic myeloproliferative disorder characterized by bone marrow fibrosis and extramedullary hematopoiesis. Recent studies provide definite diagnostic criteria and prognostic classifications of the disease, and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) now offers a chance of curing the disease. In order to put diagnostic criteria and prognostic classifications of the disease into the perspective of developing guidelines for treatment strategies, all studies published in the English literature over the last 30 years were reviewed.MATERIALS AND METHODS:  Studies were identified through a MEDLINE search (1966 to present) and from the bibliographies of relevant articles.RESULTS: The Italian Consensus Conference on diagnostic criteria is a structured enterprise aimed at formulating a definition of MMM that will be used for enrolling patients onto clinical studies. It relies on the obligatory presence of myelofibrosis and on the exclusion of the BCR-ABL rearrangement or Philadelphia chromosome, in association with combinations of traditional features. Prognostic scores allow us to identify classes of patients on the basis of hemoglobin, age, WBC count, and chromosomal abnormalities. Several nonrandomized studies have indicated that allogeneic SCT for patients under the age of 55 is effective in prolonging survival in more than 50% of cases and in possibly curing the disease. Patients with the most severe prognosis are candidates.CONCLUSION: “Consensus” methodology offers a definition of MMM useful for conducting and reporting clinical studies. A detailed knowledge of prognostic factors can help to delineate guidelines for addressing patients with allogeneic SCT.
Chemoreduction and Local Ophthalmic Therapy for Intraocular Retinoblastoma
Authors: Friedman Debra L. , Himelstein Bruce , Shields Carol L. , Shields Jerry A. , Needle Michael , Miller David , Bunin Greta R. , Meadows Anna T. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To study the effectiveness of combined systemic chemotherapy and local ophthalmic therapy for retinoblastoma with the goal of avoiding enucleation and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm clinical trial. Seventy-five eyes were followed in 47 children. Patients were treated with a six-cycle protocol of vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin. Most (83%) also received ophthalmic treatment (cryotherapy, laser photocoagulation, thermotherapy, or plaque radiation therapy) during and/or after the chemotherapy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 13 months, event-free survival was 74%, with an event defined as enucleation and/or EBRT. Six children required EBRT in seven eyes (9%); five required enucleation of one eye (7%); five required a combination of EBRT and enucleation in six eyes (8%). Reese-Ellsworth groups 1, 2, and 3 eyes had excellent results, with avoidance of EBRT or enucleation in all 39. Treatment of groups 4 and 5 was less successful, with 33% of six eyes and 53% of 30 eyes, respectively, requiring EBRT and/or enucleation. Toxicities from chemotherapy were mild and included cytopenias (89%), fever and neutropenia (28%), infection (9%), and gastrointestinal symptoms, dehydration, and vincristine neurotoxicity (40%). No patients developed a second malignancy, metastatic disease, renal disease, or ototoxicity. CONCLUSION: In retinoblastoma patients with Reese-Ellsworth eye groups 1, 2, or 3, systemic chemotherapy used with local ophthalmic therapies can eliminate the need for enucleation or EBRT without significant systemic toxicity. More effective therapy is required for Reese-Ellsworth eye groups 4 and 5.
Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Versus Cisplatin Alone in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Authors: Sandler A.B. , Nemunaitis J. , Denham C. , von Pawel J. , Cormier Y. , Gatzemeier U. , Mattson K. , Manegold Ch. , Palmer M.C. , Gregor A. , Nguyen B. , Niyikiza C. , Einhorn L.H. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: The Hoosier Oncology Group has previously reported the results of its phase II trial of the combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine. In that study of 27 assessable patients with advanced or metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the response rate was 33%, with a median survival of 8.4 months. Based on such favorable results, the Hoosier Oncology Group designed this randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with cisplatin alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of a 28-day cycle) or the combination of cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1) plus gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle). RESULTS: From August 1995 to February 1997, 522 assessable chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized. Toxicity was predominantly hematologic and was more pronounced in the combination arm, with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in 35.3% of patients compared with 1.2% of patients on the cisplatin monotherapy arm. The incidence of neutropenic fevers was less than 5% in both arms. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 25.4% of patients on the combination arm compared with 0.8% of patients on the cisplatin monotherapy arm. No serious hemorrhagic events related to thrombocytopenia were reported for either arm. The combination of gemcitabine plus cisplatin demonstrated a significant improvement over single-agent cisplatin with regard to response rate (30.4% compared with 11.1%, respectively; P < .0001), median time to progressive disease (5.6 months compared with 3.7 months, respectively; P = .0013), and overall survival (9.1 months compared with 7.6 months, respectively; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: For the first-line treatment of NSCLC, the regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin is superior to cisplatin alone in terms of response rate, time to disease progression, and overall survival.
Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of PN401 and Fluorouracil in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies
Authors: Hidalgo Manuel , Villalona-Calero Miguel A. , Eckhardt S. Gail , Drengler Ronald L. , Rodriguez Gladys , Hammond Lisa A. , Diab Sami G. , Weiss Geoffrey , Garner Allison M. , Campbell Elizabeth , Davidson Karen , Louie Arthur , O’Neil James D. , von Borstel Reid , Von Hoff Daniel D. , Rowinsky Eric K. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering PN401, an oral uridine prodrug, as a rescue agent for the toxic effects of fluorouracil (5-FU), and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of 5-FU when given with PN401, with an 8-hour treatment interval between these agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of 5-FU, given as a rapid intravenous infusion weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. PN401 was administered orally 8 hours after 5-FU administration, to achieve sustained plasma uridine concentrations of at least 50 μmol/L. Initially, patients received 6 g of PN401 orally every 8 hours for eight doses (schedule 1). When dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was consistently noted, patients then received 6 g of PN401 every 2 hours for three doses and every 6 hours thereafter for 15 doses (schedule 2). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received 50 courses of 5-FU and PN401. Among patients on schedule 1, DLT (grade 4 neutropenia complicated by fever and diarrhea) occurred in those receiving 5-FU 1,250 mg/m2/wk. Among patients on schedule 2, 5-FU 1,250 mg/m2/wk was well tolerated, but grade 4, protracted (> 5 days) neutropenia was consistently noted in those treated with higher doses of the drugs. Nonhematologic effects were uncommon and rarely severe. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU, assessed in 12 patients on schedule 2, were nonlinear, with the mean area under the time-versus-concentration curve (AUC) increasing from 298 ± 44 to 962 ± 23 μmol/L and mean clearance decreasing from 34 ± 4 to 15.6 ± 0.38 L/h/m2 as the dose of 5-FU was increased from 1,250 to 1,950 mg/m2/wk. 5-FU AUCs achieved with 5-FU 1,250 mg/m2/wk for 6 weeks along with the intensified PN401 dose schedule were approximately five-fold higher than those achieved with 5-FU alone. Plasma uridine concentrations increased with each of the three PN401 doses given every 2 hours, and uridine steady-state concentrations were greater than 50 μmol/L. CONCLUSION: Treatment with oral PN401 beginning 8 hours after 5-FU administration is well tolerated and results in sustained plasma uridine concentrations above therapeutic-relevant levels. The recommended 5-FU dosage for phase II evaluations is 1,250 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks with the intensified PN401 dose schedule (schedule 2). At this dose, systemic exposure to 5-FU as measured by AUC was five-fold higher than that observed after administration of a conventional 5-FU bolus.
Biologic Variables in the Outcome of Stages I and II Neuroblastoma Treated With Surgery as Primary Therapy: A Children’s Cancer Group Study
Authors: Perez Carlos A. , Matthay Katherine K. , Atkinson James B. , Seeger Robert C. , Shimada Hiroyuki , Haase Gerald M. , Stram Daniel O. , Gerbing Robert B. , Lukens John N. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To determine prospectively whether surgery alone is sufficient therapy for Evans stages I and II neuroblastoma and to define biologic and clinical features having prognostic potential for this group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1989 and August 1995, 374 eligible children (age range, 0 to 18 years) with newly diagnosed stage I (n = 141) and stage II (n = 233) neuroblastoma were registered onto Children’s Cancer Group trial 3881. Surgical resection was the only primary therapy except in cases with spinal cord compression, where radiation therapy was allowed. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by life-table methods according to clinical and biologic features. RESULTS: EFS and OS (mean ± SE) for all stage I patients were 93% ± 3.0% and 99% ± 1.0%, respectively, compared with 81% ± 4.0% and 98% ± 2.0%, respectively, for stage II patients. The significantly higher recurrence rate among stage II patients was managed successfully in 38 of 43 children with either surgery or multimodality treatment. There was one death among stage I patients and six among stage II. For stage II patients tumor MYCN gene amplication, unfavorable histopathology, an age greater than 2 years, and positive lymph nodes predicted a lower OS (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Children with stages I and II neuroblastoma have 98% survival with surgery alone as primary therapy. Supplemental treatment was necessary in only 10% of stage I patients and 20% of stage II patients. In children with localized neuroblastoma, a subset of patients that are at higher risk for death can be defined as those with stage II disease who have tumor MYCN amplification or who are ≥ 2 years of age with either unfavorable histopathology or positive lymph nodes.
Phase I Study of 3-Week Schedule of Irinotecan Combined With Cisplatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Authors: de Jonge Maja J. A. , Sparreboom Alex , Planting André S. T. , van der Burg Maria E. L. , de Boer-Dennert Maureen M. , Steeg Judith ter , Jacques Christian , Verweij Jaap 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility, pharmacokinetic interaction, and possible sequence-dependent effects of the irinotecan/cisplatin combination given every 3 weeks, and to assess the influence of additional granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the hematologic toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had received no more than one prior combination chemotherapy regimen or two single-agent regimens were entered. Treatment consisted of a 90-minute irinotecan infusion followed by a 3-hour cisplatin infusion on day 1, with cycles repeated once every 3 weeks. After the maximum-tolerated dose was determined, the sequence of administration was reversed. In a separate cohort of six patients, we assessed the effect of G-CSF on the experienced hematologic toxicity and dose-intensity. Irinotecan doses ranged from 175 to 300 mg/m2 and cisplatin doses ranged from 60 to 80 mg/m2. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients entered the study; one was not eligible, and two were not assessable for response. Twenty-five patients were pretreated, and 26 were not. Fifty-one patients received a total of 223 courses. The dose-limiting toxicity was a combination of neutropenic fever, diarrhea, and fatigue at a dose level combining irinotecan 300 mg/m2 with cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Neutropenia was common (grades 3 to 4, 68%). Irinotecan pharmacokinetics were linear over the dose range studied. No sequence-dependent side effects were observed. Tumor responses included three complete responses and eight partial responses. CONCLUSION: For phase II studies, we recommend irinotecan 260 mg/m2 combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for chemotherapy-naive patients in good physical condition, and irinotecan 200 mg/m2 combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 for other patients.
Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel Versus Doxorubicin in First- and Second-Line Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Adults: A Study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group
Authors: Verweij Jaap , Lee Siow Ming , Ruka Wlodzimir , Buesa Jose , Coleman Robert , van Hoessel Rene , Seynaeve Caroline , di Paola Eugenio Donato , van Glabbeke Martine , Tonelli D. , Judson Ian R. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To assess antitumor response and time to progression (TTP) with docetaxel compared with doxorubicin in first-line treatment of advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable soft tissue sarcoma lesions and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function were entered onto the study. They were randomized to either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 given as a bolus injection every 3 weeks. A maximum of seven cycles of treatment were scheduled. The study was designed as a randomized phase III study evaluating TTP by log-rank model. There was a clause for premature closure of the trial if fewer than five responses were observed among the first 25 assessable patients in the docetaxel treatment arm. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were entered onto the study; 85 were assessable for toxicity and 83 for response. The rate of severe granulocytopenia was not significantly different between the two arms. Nausea (P = .001), vomiting (P < .001), and stomatitis (P = .005) were more common with doxorubicin therapy, whereas neurotoxicity was more frequent with docetaxel treatment. The response rate to doxorubicin therapy was 30% (95% confidence interval, 17% to 46%), whereas no responses to docetaxel therapy were seen (P < .001). In view of this, the trial was closed prematurely and the phase III study part was not conducted. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is inactive in soft tissue sarcomas and cannot be recommended for further use in treatment of this disease.
Synovial Sarcoma: A Multivariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors in 112 Patients With Primary Localized Tumors of the Extremity
Authors: Lewis Jonathan J. , Antonescu Cristina R. , Leung Denis H. Y. , Blumberg David , Healey John H. , Woodruff James M. , Brennan Murray F. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Synovial sarcoma is a high-grade tumor that is associated with poor prognosis. Previous studies analyzing prognostic factors are limited because of inclusion of heterogeneous cohorts of patients with nonextremity and recurrent tumors. The objective of this study was to determine independent prognostic factors of primary synovial sarcoma localized to the extremity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1, 1982, and June 30, 1996, 112 patients underwent surgical resection for cure at our institution and then were followed-up prospectively. Clinical and pathologic factors examined for prognostic value included age, sex, tumor site and location, depth, size, microscopic status of surgical margins, invasion of bone or neurovascular structures, and monophasic or biphasic histology. The end points analyzed were the time to first local recurrence that was not preceded by a distant recurrence, time to any distant recurrence, and time to disease-related mortality. These end points were modeled using the method of Kaplan and Meier and analyzed by the log-rank test and Cox regression. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up among survivors in this cohort of 112 patients was 72 months. The 5-year local-recurrence, distant-recurrence, and mortality rates were 12%, 39%, and 25%, respectively. Tumor size ≥ 5 cm (P = .001; relative risk [RR] = 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 5.2) and the presence of bone or neurovascular invasion (P = .04; RR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.3) were independent adverse predictors of distant recurrence. Tumor size ≥ 5 cm (P = .003; RR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.3) and the presence of bone or neurovascular invasion (P = .03; RR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.0 to 6.5) were also independent adverse predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: The natural history of primary synovial sarcoma of the extremity is related to tumor size and invasion of bone and neurovascular structures.
Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Authors: Shepherd Frances A. , Dancey Janet , Ramlau Rodryg , Mattson Karin , Gralla Richard , O’Rourke Mark , Levitan Nathan , Gressot Laurent , Vincent Mark , Burkes Ronald , Coughlin Susan , Kim Yong , Berille Jocelyne 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether treatment with single-agent docetaxel would result in longer survival than would best supportive care in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer who had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Secondary end points included assessment of response (docetaxel arm only), toxicity, and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with performance statuses of 0 to 2 and stage IIIB/IV non–small-cell lung cancer with either measurable or evaluable lesions were eligible for entry onto the study if they had undergone one or more platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and if they had adequate hematology and biochemistry parameters. They were excluded if they had symptomatic brain metastases or if they had previously been treated with paclitaxel. Patients were stratified by performance status and best response to cisplatin chemotherapy and were then randomized to treatment with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (49 patients) or 75 mg/m2 (55 patients) or best supportive care. Patients in both arms were assessed every 3 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred four patients (103 of whom were eligible for entry onto the study) were well balanced for prognostic factors. Of 84 patients with measurable lesions, six (7.1%) achieved partial responses (three patients at each dose level). Time to progression was longer for docetaxel patients than for best supportive care patients (10.6 v 6.7 weeks, respectively; P < .001), as was median survival (7.0 v 4.6 months; log-rank test, P = .047). The difference was more significant for docetaxel 75 mg/m2 patients, compared with corresponding best supportive care patients (7.5 v 4.6 months; log-rank test, P = .010; 1-year survival, 37% v 11%; χ2 test, P = .003). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 11 patients treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m2, three of whom died, and in one patient treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 . Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity, with the exception of diarrhea, occurred at a similar rate in both the docetaxel and best supportive care groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with docetaxel is associated with significant prolongation of survival, and at a dose of 75 mg/m2, the benefits of docetaxel therapy outweigh the risks.
Molecular Remission After Allogeneic or Autologous Transplantation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Multiple Myeloma
Authors: Martinelli Giovanni , Terragna Carolina , Zamagni Elena , Ronconi Sonia , Tosi Patrizia , Lemoli Roberto M. , Bandini Giuseppe , Motta Maria Rosa , Testoni Nicoletta , Amabile Marilina , Ottaviani Emanuela , Vianelli Nicola , de Vivo Antonio , Gozzetti Alessandro , Tura Sante , Cavo Michele 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical relevance of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), 50 patients were monitored while they were in complete clinical remission (CCR) after autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stringent molecular monitoring using clonal markers based on rearranged immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes was performed in 44 of 50 MM patients in CCR. Molecular clinical remission (MCR) was defined as more than one consecutive negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test result. RESULTS: Twelve (27%) of 44 molecularly monitored patients achieved MCR; four of the 12 became PCR-positive, and one of these four relapsed. In comparison with patients who did not achieve MCR, patients who achieved MCR had a significantly lower relapse rate (41% v 16%; P < .05) and longer relapse-free survival (35 v 110 months; P < .005). Fourteen of 26 patients in CCR who had received allografts were evaluated on a molecular basis: seven (50%) of the 14 achieved MCR and did not relapse; one of the seven remaining patients relapsed. Thirty of 47 patients in CCR who received autografts were evaluated on a molecular basis: five (16%) of the 30 achieved MCR; two of these five became PCR-negative, and one of these two relapsed. Ten of the 25 remaining patients later relapsed. For these nonrandomized groups, the higher MCR rate after allograft procedures was statistically significant (P < .01; Fisher’s exact test). CONCLUSION: MCR can be obtained in a relatively high proportion of MM patients who have achieved CCR after undergoing allograft procedures and in a smaller fraction of patients after undergoing autograft procedures. In approximately one fourth of MM patients who achieve CCR after transplantation, it may be possible to keep the disease burden constantly below the PCR threshold. Because MCR was associated with prolonged relapse-free survival, these patients could have a relatively favorable clinical outcome.