bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
High-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in the treatment of high-risk breast cancer: prognostic indicators of progression-free and overall survival.
Authors: Somlo G , Doroshow J H , Forman S J , Odom-Maryon T , Lee J , Chow W , Hamasaki V , Leong L , Morgan R , Margolin K , Raschko J , Shibata S , Tetef M , Yen Y , Simpson J , Molina A 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To examine the predictive value of tumor- and treatment-specific prognostic indicators of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with high-risk breast cancer (HRBC) treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and stem-cell rescue. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between June 1989 and September 1994, 114 patients with HRBC (stage II with > or = 10 axillary lymph nodes involved, stage IIIA, and stage IIIB inflammatory carcinoma) received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by HDCT with etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and either doxorubicin (CAVP) or cisplatin (CCVP). Variables analyzed included stage, tumor size, number of axillary nodes involved, grade and receptor status, and types of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy and HDCT. RESULTS With a median follow-up time of 46 months (range, 23 to 93), Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3.5-year OS for stage II, IIIA, and IIIB HRBC are 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67% to 97%), 79% (95% CI, 67% to 91%), and 72% (95% CI, 53% to 91%); RFS estimates are 71% (95% CI, 56% to 85%), 57% (95% CI, 43% to 72%), and 50% (95% CI, 29% to 71%) irrespective of the HDCT regimen. In univariate analysis, the risk of relapse was lower for patients with progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumors (risk ratio [RR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.81; P = .01) and higher for patients with inflammatory carcinoma (RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.76; P = .05). OS was better for patients with PR (RR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.55; P = .003) and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17 to 1.02; P = .05); OS was worse for patients with high-grade primary tumors (RR, 4.08; 95% CI, 1.21-13.7; P = .02). In multivariate analysis, PR positivity was associated with improved RFS (P = .01) and OS (P = .001). CONCLUSION HDCT in selected patients with HRBC is safe and warrants further evaluation. Patients with receptor-negative, high-grade, or inflammatory tumors require improvement in their therapeutic options. Better assessment of the role of HDCT awaits completion of ongoing randomized trials.
Lung cancer practice guidelines: lessons learned and issues addressed by the Ontario Lung Cancer Disease Site Group.
Authors: Evans W K , Newman T , Graham I , Rusthoven J J , Logan D , Shepherd F A , Chamberlain D 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE The primary objective was to identify the lessons learned and issues addressed by the Disease Site Group (DSG) developing guidelines on lung cancer for practitioners in the province of Ontario. METHODS The minutes of the Ontario Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (LCDSG) and the meeting notes of a medical sociologist who attended all LCDSG meetings were reviewed to identify the disease-specific and generic issues addressed by the LCDSG during guideline development. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION The Ontario LCDSG has completed three practice guidelines and has five evidence-based recommendations (EBRs) in production. Topics for guideline development were selected on the basis of known practice variability (eg, advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC]); the size of the patient population that could potentially be affected by the guideline; results of phase II trials of new and potentially expensive agents (vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and docetaxel); and randomized controlled clinical trials that support new practice standards (combined modality therapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC). The wording of each EBR reflects the strength and quality of the evidence in support of the treatment option, the primary outcome(s), and the individual physician and discipline values concerning treatment outcomes in the absence of known patient values.
Randomized prospective study of the benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity.
Authors: Yang J C , Chang A E , Baker A R , Sindelar W F , Danforth D N , Topalian S L , DeLaney T , Glatstein E , Steinberg S M , Merino M J , Rosenberg S A 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE This randomized, prospective study assesses the impact of postoperative external-beam radiation therapy on local recurrence (LR), overall survival (OS), and quality of life after limb-sparing resection of extremity sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with extremity tumors and a limb-sparing surgical option were randomized to receive or not receive postoperative adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy. Patients with high-grade sarcomas received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy whereas patients with low-grade sarcomas or locally aggressive nonmalignant tumors were randomized after surgery alone. RESULTS Ninety-one patients with high-grade lesions were randomized; 47 to receive radiotherapy (XRT) and 44 to not receive XRT. With a median follow-up of 9.6 years, a highly significant decrease (P2 = .0028) in the probability of LR was seen with radiation, but no difference in OS was shown. Of 50 patients with low-grade lesions (24 randomized to resection alone and 26 to resection and postoperative XRT), there was also a lower probability of LR (P2 = .016) in patients receiving XRT, again, without a difference in OS. A concurrent quality-of-life study showed that extremity radiotherapy resulted in significantly worse limb strength, edema, and range of motion, but these deficits were often transient and had few measurable effects on activities of daily life or global quality of life. CONCLUSION This study indicates that although postoperative external-beam radiotherapy is highly effective in preventing LRs, selected patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma who have a low risk of LR may not require adjuvant XRT after limb-sparing surgery (LSS).
Radiation therapy for relapsed CNS germinoma after primary chemotherapy.
Authors: Merchant T E , Davis B J , Sheldon J M , Leibel S A 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To retrospectively evaluate the ability of radiation therapy to salvage patients with CNS germinoma who relapsed after treatment with primary chemotherapy on a multiinstitution trial that included carboplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (PEB). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eight patients with CNS germinoma received carboplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin as their only nonsurgical treatment following their initial diagnosis. At the time of relapse each patient received high-dose cyclophosphamide (one to three cycles) followed by craniospinal irradiation (25.2 to 36 Gy) and a boost to the site of recurrent disease (45 to 54 Gy). Six of eight patients had disease at relapse that was more extensive than at diagnosis. One patient had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of leptomeningeal enhancement in the cauda equina although CSF cytology was negative, and one patient had cytologic evidence of CSF involvement. The median time to relapse following primary chemotherapy was 17 months. RESULTS Although myelosuppression was prolonged following the administration of preirradiation chemotherapy, all patients completed a continuous course of radiation therapy. With a median follow-up after radiation therapy of 32 months (range, 16 to 47 months), no failures have occurred. CONCLUSION Radiation therapy has a proven record of efficacy in the treatment of intracranial germinoma and it remains the standard therapy with which others are compared for treatment response, local control, and overall survival. Arguments can be made for alternative approaches when patients face hormonal or neurocognitive dysfunction as a result of radiation therapy; however, any reduction in late effects will have to be weighed against the probability of survival if alternative approaches prove to be inferior.
Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute.
Authors: Bonadonna G , Valagussa P , Brambilla C , Ferrari L , Moliterni A , Terenziani M , Zambetti M 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE Primary chemotherapy was administered to patients with tumors that measured > or = 2.5 cm in largest diameter to decrease the size of the primary tumor and allow for effective local and distant control while avoiding mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two prospective nonrandomized studies were performed that used different regimens of primary chemotherapy followed by breast-sparing surgery in the presence of objective tumor remission. Additional postoperative chemotherapy was given to women at high risk of disease relapse. The median follow-up duration was 65 months. RESULTS A total of 536 assessable patients were enrolled, and the main characteristics were fairly comparable between the two trials. Following primary chemotherapy, 85% of patients could be subjected to breast-sparing surgery; in 14 patients (3%), surgical specimens failed to show any residual neoplastic cell. In the final multivariate analysis, the histologically assessed extent of axillary node involvement (P < .001), as well as degree of response to primary chemotherapy (P = .034), represented the significant variables able to influence 8-year relapse-free survival. In women subjected to a breast-conserving approach, the cumulative risk of local relapse as first event alone was 6.8% (95% confidence interval, 3.9% to 8.8%). CONCLUSION Current findings indicate that primary chemotherapy can be safely administered in women with large tumors (>5.0 cm) and can allow breast-sparing surgery in a high fraction of patients (62%). However, to assess effectively the worthiness of this approach on long-term results, properlyconceived large randomized studies with newer and more effective drug regimens are warranted.
Switching from morphine to oral methadone in treating cancer pain: what is the equianalgesic dose ratio?
Authors: Ripamonti C , Groff L , Brunelli C , Polastri D , Stavrakis A , De Conno F 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To define the dose ratio between morphine and methadone in relation to the previous morphine dose and the number of days needed to achieve the same level of analgesia in a group of patients with advanced cancer with pain who switched from morphine to oral methadone. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional prospective study of 38 consecutive cancer patients who switched from morphine to oral methadone was performed. The intensity of pain before, during, and after the switching period was assessed through a four-point verbal Likert scale. The relationship between previous morphine dose and the final equianalgesic methadone dose, dose ratio between morphine and methadone, and the number of days required to achieve equianalgesia have been examined by means of Pearson's correlation coefficient, scatter plots, and Cuzick's test for trend respectively. RESULTS Before the switch, the median oral equivalent daily dose of morphine was 145 mg/d; after the switch, the median equianalgesic oral methadone dose was 21 mg/d. A median time of 3 days (range, 1 to 7 days) was necessary to achieve the equianalgesia with oral methadone; the lower the preswitching morphine dose, the fewer days necessary to achieve equianalgesia with oral methadone (P < .001). Dose ratios ranged from 2.5:1 to 14.3:1 (median, 7.75:1), which indicated that, in most cases, the dose ratio was much higher than that suggested by the published equianalgesic tables. A strong linear positive relationship between morphine and methadone equianalgesic doses was obtained (Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.91). The dose ratio increased with the increase of the previous morphine dose with a much higher increase at low morphine doses. CONCLUSION The results of our study confirm that methadone is a potent opioid, more potent than believed. Caution is recommended when switching from any opioid to methadone, especially in patients who are tolerant to high doses of opioids.
Cytotoxic and hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review of published randomized trials involving 31,510 women.
Authors: Fossati R , Confalonieri C , Torri V , Ghislandi E , Penna A , Pistotti V , Tinazzi A , Liberati A 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of medical treatment for metastatic breast cancer. METHODS RCTs published between 1975 and 1997 have been classified according to 12 therapeutic comparisons: (1) polychemotherapy (PCHT) agents versus single agent; (2) PCHT regimens with anthracycline versus PCHT without anthracycline; (3) other PCHT versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF); (4) chemotherapy (CHT) with epirubicin versus CHT with doxorubicin; (5) CHT versus same CHT delivered with less intensive schedules; (6) other endocrine therapy (OET) versus tamoxifen; (7) OET plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone; (8) OET versus medroxyprogesterone; (9) OET versus aromatase inhibitors; (10) OET versus megestrol; (11) endocrine therapy (ET) versus same ET at lower doses; and (12) CHT plus ET versus CHT. Tumor response rates, mortality hazards ratio (HR) and frequency of severe side effects were the outcome measures. RESULTS A total of 189 eligible trials (31,510 patients) were identified. All provided response rates and 133 (70%) data or survival curves needed for calculation of the HR. In eight of 12 comparisons, statistically significant differences for response emerged (1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12); all but no. 8 favored the first term of the comparison. Overall survival analysis showed better results of (a) PCHT versus single-agent CHT (HR=0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.90); (b) CHT with doxorubicin versus CHT with epirubicin (HR=1.13; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.27); (c) CHT versus the same CHT delivered with less intensive schedules (HR=0.90; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.97); (d) ET versus the same ET at lower doses (HR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97). Quality of life was measured in only 2,995 of 31,510 patients (9.5%). CONCLUSION Despite some evidence of effectiveness of specific regimens, the relevance of these findings is limited by the modest survival benefit and the lack of evaluation of the quality-of-life impact of these treatments.
Occult tumor contamination of hematopoietic stem-cell products does not affect clinical outcome of autologous transplantation in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Authors: Cooper B W , Moss T J , Ross A A , Ybanez J , Lazarus H M 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To determine whether occult tumor contamination of autologous bone marrow or peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPC) influences clinical outcome after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with stage IV breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We used an immunocytochemical assay capable of detecting one tumor cell in 5 x 10(5) hematopoietic cells to analyze bone marrow and/or PBPC collections obtained from 57 consecutive women with chemotherapy-sensitive metastatic breast cancer who received high-dose chemotherapy. The influence of occult tumor on time to progression, overall survival, and first site of recurrence (old or new) was studied. RESULTS Twenty-three of 57 (40%) patients received bone marrow (n=6) or peripheral-blood progenitor collections (n=17) that contained microscopic cancer. Median time to progression and overall survival were 9 and 22 months in patients who did not receive infused tumor cells, compared with 10 and 24 months, respectively, in those who received occult tumor (P=not significant [NS]). Worse survival, but not time to progression, was observed in six patients who received > or = 2/100,000 tumor cells. Regardless of whether occult tumor was infused, the majority of relapses occurred in prior, rather than new sites of disease. Three patients who received stem-cell products contaminated by microscopic breast cancer remain free from progression at 21+, 47+, and 52+ months. CONCLUSION Microscopic tumor was frequently detected by immunocytochemistry in hematopoietic stem-cell products, but did not predict for inferior treatment outcome in this cohort of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Quantitative information regarding infused tumor burden may have prognostic significance.
Monoclonal antibody-based therapies for hematologic malignancies.
Authors: Multani P S , Grossbard M L 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To review recent advances in the development and clinical roles of monoclonal antibody (MoAb)-based therapies in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. DESIGN A search of MEDLINE and CANCERLIT was conducted to identify relevant publications. The bibliographies of these references also were used to identify articles and abstracts. These references were then reviewed. RESULTS In the two decades since the first patient was treated with MoAb therapy, there have been significant advances in the biology, pharmacology, and clinical application of MoAb-based therapies. Three distinct fields of research have emerged: unconjugated MoAbs, immunotoxin-conjugated MoAbs (ITs), and radionuclide-conjugated MoAbs (RICs). The unconjugated MoAbs are less toxic but depend on host mechanisms to mediate cytotoxicity. The ITs carry a potent toxin, although at the cost of a narrow therapeutic index that may limit clinical use. The RICs offer significant potency, even in refractory disease, but their complexity may limit their use to large cancer centers. The current challenges in the development of MoAb-based therapies are to identify the proper target antigens, contend with bulk disease in which penetration may be limited, and choose the optimal clinical settings for their use, such as the minimal residual disease state or in combination with conventional chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Although significant research is still needed, MoAb-based therapies promise to offer new options for the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies.
Determinants of prognosis in late chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Authors: Rodriguez J , Cortes J , Smith T , O'Brien S , Rios M B , Talpaz M , Kantarjian H 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE Since interferon alfa (IFN-A) became an established treatment in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), more patients are referred to tertiary centers in late chronic phase (ie, > 12 months after diagnosis). Trials conducted in this phase cannot be evaluated precisely unless the features that determine prognosis in late chronic-phase CML are identified. The purpose of this study is to define the prognostic determinants of late chronic-phase CML. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1980 to 1997,257 consecutive CML patients referred in late chronic phase were studied. Their clinical characteristics at the time of referral and their association with survival were investigated. A staging model was designed. RESULTS The median survival from time of referral was 43 months. Pretreatment characteristics associated with worse outcome included older age, poor performance status, splenomegaly, low albumin level, high percentage of blasts or basophils in peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow, longer duration of chronic phase, and poor-risk group as defined by the Synthesis model. Prior exposure to IFN-A was not associated with worse outcome. By multivariate analysis, characteristics associated with shorter survival were age of 60 years or older, time from diagnosis of 3 years or greater, performance status of 1 or greater, PB basophils of 7% or greater, spleen 10 cm or greater, PB blasts 3% or greater, and albumin level less than 4 g/dL. A model that included age, duration of chronic phase, performance status, and PB basophils was generated. Patients with no, one, two, or three or greater adverse factors had median survivals of 71, 49, 26, and 19 months, respectively. CONCLUSION A staging model for late chronic-phase CML can stratify patients in four groups with significantly different outcomes. If confirmed in independent populations, such a model could be considered in the analysis of future trials of treatment strategies in late chronic-phase CML.
18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography as a new approach to detect lymphomatous bone marrow.
Authors: Moog F , Bangerter M , Kotzerke J , Guhlmann A , Frickhofen N , Reske S N 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE Bone marrow involvement in patients with malignant lymphoma is considered a sign of generalized disease with less favorable prognosis. Bone marrow biopsy (BMB), which represents the standard diagnostic procedure, however, is associated with a high rate of false-negative findings, which may lead to errors in management. The present study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) as a new method to evaluate bone marrow involvement in patients with malignant lymphoma. METHODS Seventy-eight consecutive, untreated patients with either non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL; n = 39) or Hodgkin's disease (HD; n = 39) were prospectively evaluated. Static FDG-PET imaging was performed following application of 270 MBq (F-18)-FDG. Attenuation correction was performed in 63 of 78 patients. Visual evaluation was performed by two examiners unaware of the clinical data. Material for BMB (70 bilateral, 8 unilateral) was obtained from the posterior iliac crest. Discordant results of PET and biopsy were settled, when possible, on the basis of further biopsy or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS In addition to seven concordant positive and 57 concordant negative findings, biopsy revealed another four cases with bone marrow involvement not detectable by FDG-PET analysis (+5.1%). On the contrary, PET showed bone marrow areas of intensive FDG uptake that suggested bone marrow lymphoma in 10 patients with negative biopsies (+12.8%). In eight patients, FDG-PET findings were confirmed by either histologic verification (n = 4), MRI (n = 2), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for rearranged immunoglobulin H sequences (n = 1), or clinical presentation (n = 1). Two cases remained unresolved. CONCLUSION The results indicate that FDG-PET has a high potential to detect bone marrow involvement in malignant lymphoma. Besides confirming lesions found at BMB, FDG-PET provided additional information, which, in eight of 78 patients (10.3%), led to an upgrade of the tumor stage.