bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology*
Authors: Recht Abram , Edge Stephen B. , Solin Lawrence J. , Robinson David S. , Estabrook Alison , Fine Richard E. , Fleming Gini F. , Formenti Silvia , Hudis Clifford , Kirshner Jeffrey J. , Krause David A. , Kuske Robert R. , Langer Amy S. , Sledge George W. , Whelan Timothy J. , Pfister David G. 
Published: February 2017

OBJECTIVE: To determine indications for the use of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for patients with invasive breast cancer with involved axil-lary lymph nodes or locally advanced disease who receive systemic therapy. These guidelines are intended for use in the care of patients outside of clinical trials. POTENTIAL INTERVENTION: The benefits and risks of PMRT in such patients, as well as subgroups of these patients, were considered. The details of the PMRT technique were also evaluated. OUTCOMES: The outcomes considered included freedom from local-regional recurrence, survival (disease-free and overall), and long-term toxicity. EVIDENCE: An expert multidisciplinary panel reviewed pertinent information from the published literature through July 2000; certain investigators were contacted for more recent and, in some cases, unpublished information. A computerized search was performed of MEDLINE data; directed searches based on the bibliographies of primary articles were also performed. VALUES: Levels of evidence and guideline grades were assigned by the Panel using standard criteria. A “recommendation” was made when level I or II evidence was available and there was consensus as to its meaning. A “suggestion” was made based on level III, IV, or V evidence and there was consensus as to its meaning. Areas of clinical importance were pointed out where guidelines could not be formulated due to insufficient evidence or lack of consensus. RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations, suggestions, and expert opinions of the Panel are described in this article. VALIDATION: Seven outside reviewers, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Committee members, and the ASCO Board of Directors reviewed this document.
Lung Cancer After Hodgkin’s Disease: A Nested Case-Control Study of the Relation to Treatment
Authors: Swerdlow A. J. , Schoemaker M. J. , Allerton R. , Horwich A. , Barber J. A. , Cunningham D. , Lister T. A. , Rohatiner A. Z.S. , Vaughan Hudson G. , Williams M. V. , Linch D. C. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To investigate the causes of the raised risk of lung cancer in patients who have had Hodgkin’s disease, and in particular the relationship to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted within a cohort of 5,519 patients with Hodgkin’s disease treated in Britain during 1963 through 1993. For 88 cases of lung cancer and 176 matched control subjects, information on treatment and other risk factors was extracted from hospital case-notes, and odds ratios for lung cancer in relation to these factors were calculated. RESULTS: Risk of lung cancer was borderline significantly greater in patients treated with mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) chemotherapy than those who did not receive this treatment (relative risk [RR] = 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 2.82), and increased with number of cycles of MOPP (P = .07). Exclusion of lung cancers for which histologic confirmation was not available strengthened these associations (RR = 2.41; 95% CI, 1.33 to 4.51; P = .004 for any MOPP and P = .007 for trend with number of cycles of MOPP). Risks were not raised, however, after chlorambucil, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisone treatment. There was evidence that the raised risk of lung cancer occurring in relation to radiotherapy was restricted to histologies other than adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that MOPP chemotherapy may lead to elevated risk of lung cancer, at least in certain subgroups of patients. The role of chemotherapy in the etiology of lung cancer after Hodgkin’s disease deserves further investigation.
Improved Prognostication of Renal Cell Carcinoma Using an Integrated Staging System
Authors: Zisman Amnon , Pantuck Allan J. , Dorey Fredrick , Said Jonathan W. , Shvarts Oleg , Quintana Deanna , Gitlitz Barbara J. , deKernion Jean B. , Figlin Robert A. , Belldegrun Arie S. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To integrate stage, grade, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) into a clinically useful tool capable of stratifying the survival of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 661 patients undergoing nephrectomy at University of California Los Angeles between 1989 and 1999 were evaluated. Median age was 61 years, male-to-female ratio was 2.2:1, and median follow-up was 37 months. Survival time was the primary end point assessed. Sixty-four possible combinations of stage, grade, and ECOG PS were analyzed and collapsed into distinct groups. The internal validity of the categoriesd was challenged by a univariate analysis and a multivariate analysis testing for the accountability of each UCLA Integrated Staging System (UISS) category against independent variables shown to have impact on survival. RESULTS: Combining and stratifying 1997 tumor-node-metastasis stage, Fuhrman’s grade and ECOG PS resulted in five survival stratification groups designated UISS, and numbered I to V. The projected 2- and 5-year survival for the UISS groups are as follows for the groups: I, 96% and 94%; II, 89% and 67%; III, 66% and 39%; IV, 42% and 23%; and V, 9% and 0%, respectively. UISS accounted for the significant variables in the variate analysis. CONCLUSION: A novel system for staging and predicting survival for RCC integrating clinical variables is offered. UISS is simple to use and is superior to stage alone in differentiating patients’ survival. Our data suggests that UISS is an important prognostic tool for counseling patients with various stages of kidney cancer. Further prospective large-scale validation with external data is awaited.
Comparison of Methods of Measuring HER-2 in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated With High-Dose Chemotherapy
Authors: Harris Lyndsay N. , Liotcheva Vlayka , Broadwater Gloria , Ramirez Michael J. , Maimonis Peter , Anderson Steven , Everett Tajuana , Harpole David , Moore Mary Beth , Berry Donald A. , Rizzeri David , Vredenburgh James J. , Bentley Rex C. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: HER-2 is overexpressed in 20% to 30% of human breast cancer and is associated with poor outcome. Studies suggest an association between HER-2 overexpression and resistance to alkylating agents. To further evaluate this relationship, we assessed the interaction of HER-2, measured by different methods, and outcome after dose intensification with alkylating agents in metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1988 to 1995 at Duke University, 425 patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in a study of high-dose alkylating agents (HDC) with autologous cellular support after doxorubicin-based therapy (AFM). HER-2 was measured in serum for shed extracellular domain (ECD) and in tissue by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: HER-2 ECD was positive in 29% (19 of 65) of patients pre-AFM and in 11.7% (34 of 290) pre-HDC. Higher pre-AFM and higher pre-HDC HER-2 ECD predicted worse overall survival (P = .045 and P = .0096, respectively). HER-2 overexpression by IHC and FISH showed no correlation with worse disease-free survival or overall survival. FISH and ECD were highly specific for IHC (97.3% and 97.7% respectively). However, ECD had a low sensitivity for IHC—only 22% of patients with HER-2 in the primary tumor shed ECD into the serum. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the method of measuring HER-2 is important in predicting clinical outcome. HER2 ECD may identify a poor prognosis subgroup of HER-2–positive tumors. Lack of association of HER2 by IHC/FISH with worse outcome suggests that therapy with AFM and/or HDC therapy may be able to overcome the effect of this prognostic factor or it may not be a prognostic factor in this setting.
Adenovirus-Mediated Wild-Type p53 Gene Transfer in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Phase II Study
Authors: Schuler Martin , Herrmann Richard , De Greve Jacques L.P. , Stewart A. Keith , Gatzemeier Ulrich , Stewart David J. , Laufman Leslie , Gralla Richard , Kuball Jürgen , Buhl Roland , Heussel Claus P. , Kommoss Friedrich , Perruchoud André P. , Shepherd Frances A. , Fritz Mary Ann , Horowitz Jo Ann , Huber Christoph , Rochlitz Christoph 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To study the additional benefit from adenoviral p53 gene therapy in patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with nonresectable NSCLC were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter phase II study of three cycles of regimen A, carboplatin (area under the curve, 6; day 1) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2, day 1), or regimen B, cisplatin (100 mg/m2, day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, and 22) in combination with intratumoral injection of 7.5 × 1012 particles of SCH 58500 (rAd/p53, day 1). Responses of individual tumor lesions were assessed after each cycle, and gene transfer was examined in posttreatment tumor biopsies using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: There was no difference between the response rate of lesions treated with p53 gene therapy in addition to chemotherapy (52% objective responses) and lesions treated with chemotherapy alone (48% objective responses). Subgroup analysis according to the chemotherapy regimens revealed evidence for increased mean local tumor regressions in response to additional p53 gene therapy in patients receiving regimen B, but not in patients receiving regimen A. There was no survival difference between the two chemotherapy regimens, and the median survival of the cohort was 10.5 months (1-year survival, 44%). Transgene expression was confirmed in tumor samples from 68% of patients, and toxicities attributable to gene therapy were mild to moderate. CONCLUSION: Intratumoral adenoviral p53 gene therapy appears to provide no additional benefit in patients receiving an effective first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC.
Polymorphisms of the Repeated Sequences in the Enhancer Region of the Thymidylate Synthase Gene Promoter May Predict Downstaging After Preoperative Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer
Authors: Villafranca Elena , Okruzhnov Yury , Dominguez Miguel A. , García-Foncillas Jesús , Azinovic Ignacio , Martínez Enrique , Illarramendi Jose J. , Arias Fernando , Martínez-Monge Rafael , Salgado Esteban , Angeletti Silvia , Brugarolas Antonio 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Thymidylate synthase (TS) is an important target enzyme for the fluoropyrimidines. TS gene promoter possesses regulatory tandemly repeated (TR) sequences that are polymorphic in humans, depending on ethnic factors. These polymorphisms have been reported to influence TS expression. TS expression levels affect tumor downstaging after preoperative fluoruracil (5-FU)–based chemoradiation. Tumor downstaging correlates with improved local control and disease-free survival. The aim of this study is to correlate TR polymorphisms with downstaging and disease-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with rectal cancer underwent tumor resection after preoperative 5-FU–based chemoradiation. Tumor downstaging was evaluated by comparing the pretreatment T stage with the pathologic stage observed in the surgical specimen. TS polymorphism genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the corresponding TS promoter region, and products of amplification were electrophoresed, obtaining products of 220 bp (2/2), 248 bp (3/3), or both (2/3). The TS polymorphism genotype results were subsequently compared with the downstaging observed and with disease-free survival. RESULTS: Patients who were homozygous for triple TR (3/3) had a lower probability of downstaging than patients who were homozygous with double TR or heterozygous patients (2/2 and 2/3): 22% versus 60% (P = .036; logistic regression). Furthermore, a trend toward improved 3-year disease-free survival was detected in the 2/2 and 2/3 groups, compared with that in the 3/3 group (81% v 41%; P = .17). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that TS repetitive-sequence polymorphisms are predictive for tumor downstaging. TR sequences in TS promoter may be useful as a novel means of predicting response to preoperative 5-FU–based chemoradiation.
2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast and Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology*
Authors: Bast Robert C. , Ravdin Peter , Hayes Daniel F. , Bates Susan , Fritsche Herbert , Jessup John M. , Kemeny Nancy , Locker Gershon Y. , Mennel Robert G. , Somerfield Mark R. 
Published: February 2017

OBJECTIVE: To update the 1997 clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor marker tests in the prevention, screening, treatment, and surveillance of breast and colorectal cancers. These guidelines are intended for use in the care of patients outside of clinical trials. OPTIONS: Six tumor markers for colorectal cancer and eight for breast cancer were considered. They could be recommended or not for routine use or for special circumstances. In addition to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 15-3, CA 27.29 was also considered among the serum tumor markers for breast cancer. OUTCOMES: In general, the significant health outcomes identified for use in making clinical practice guidelines (overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, lesser toxicity, and cost-effectiveness) were used. EVIDENCE: A computerized literature search from 1994 to March 1999 was performed. VALUES: The same values for use, utility, and levels of evidence were used by the committee. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The same benefit, harms, and costs were used. RECOMMENDATION: Changes were recommended (see Appendix). VALIDATION: The updated recommendations were validated by external review by the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s (ASCO’s) Health Services Research Committee and by ASCO’s Board of Directors. SPONSOR: American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Value of High-Dose Cytarabine During Interval Therapy of a Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster–Based Protocol in Increased-Risk Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: Results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 58881 Randomized Phase III Trial
Authors: Millot F. , Suciu S. , Philippe N. , Benoit Y. , Mazingue F. , Uyttebroeck A. , Lutz P. , Mechinaud F. , Robert A. , Boutard P. , Marguerite G. , Ferster A. , Plouvier E. , Rialland X. , Behard C. , Plantaz D. , Dresse M. F. , Philippet P. , Norton L. , Thyss A. , Dastugue N. , Waterkeyn C. , Vilmer E. , Otten J. ,   for the Children’s Leukemia Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 58881 study was designed to test in a prospective multicentric randomized trial the value of high-dose (HD) intravenous (IV) cytarabine (Ara-C) added to HD IV methotrexate (MTX) to reduce the incidence of CNS and systemic relapses in children with increased-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or stage III and IV lymphoblastic lymphoma treated with a Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM)–based regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After completion of induction-consolidation phase, children with increased-risk (risk factor > 0.8 or T-lineage) ALL or stage III and IV lymphoblastic lymphoma were randomized to receive four courses of HD MTX (5 g/m2 over 24 hours every 2 weeks) and four intrathecal administrations of MTX (Arm A) or the same treatment schedule with additional HD IV Ara-C (1 g/m2 in bolus injection 12 and 24 hours after the start of each MTX infusion) (Arm B). RESULTS: Between January 1990 and January 1996, 653 patients with ALL (593 patients) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (60 patients) were randomized: 323 were assigned to Arm A (without Ara-C) and 330 to Arm B (with Ara-C). A total of 190 events (177 relapses and 13 deaths without relapse) were reported, and the median follow up was 6.5 years (range, 2 to 10 years). The incidence rates of CNS relapse were similar in both arms whether isolated (5.6% and 3.3%, respectively) or combined (5.3% and 4.6%, respectively). The estimated 6-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was similar (log-rank P = .67) in the two treatment groups: 70.4% (SE = 2.6%) in Arm A and 71.0% (SE = 2.5%) in Arm B. The 6-year DFS rate was similar for ALL and LL patients: 70.2% (SE = 1.9%) versus 76.3% (SE = 5.6%). CONCLUSION: Prevention of CNS relapse was satisfactorily achieved with HD IV MTX and intrathecal injections of MTX in children with increased-risk ALL or stage III and IV lymphoblastic lymphoma treated with our BFM-based treatment protocol in which cranial irradiation was omitted. Disappointingly, with the dose schedule used in this protocol, HD Ara-C added to HD MTX, although well tolerated, failed to further decrease the incidence of CNS relapse or to improve the overall DFS.
Esophageal Cancer: The Mode of Lymphatic Tumor Cell Spread and Its Prognostic Significance
Authors: Hosch Stefan B. , Stoecklein Nikolas H. , Pichlmeier U. , Rehders Alexander , Scheunemann Peter , Niendorf Axel , Knoefel Wolfram T. , Izbicki Jakob R. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Data on skip metastases and their significance are lacking for esophageal cancer. This issue is important to determine the extent of lymphadenectomy for esophageal resection. In this study we examined the lymphatic spread in esophageal cancer by routine histopathology and by immunohistochemistry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,584 resected lymph nodes were obtained from 86 patients with resected esophageal carcinoma and evaluated by routine histopathology. Additionally, frozen tissue sections of 540 lymph nodes classified as tumor-free by routine histopathology were screened for micrometastases by immunohistochemistry with the monoclonal antibody Ber-EP4. The lymph nodes were mapped according to the mapping scheme of the American Thoracic Society modified by Casson et al. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (51%) had pN1 disease, and 61 patients (71%) harbored lymphatic micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry. Skip metastases detected by routine histopathology were present in 34% of pN1 patients. Skipping of micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry was found in 66%. The presence of micrometastases was associated with a significantly decreased relapse-free and overall survival (56.0 v 10.0 months and > 64 v 15 months, P < .0001 and P = .004, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed the independent prognostic influence of micrometastases in lymph nodes. Lymph node skipping had no significant independent prognostic influence on survival. CONCLUSION: Histopathologically and immunohistochemically detectable skip metastases are a frequent event in esophageal cancer. Only extensive lymph node sampling, in conjunction with immunohistochemical evaluation, will lead to accurate staging. An improved staging system is essential for more individualized adjuvant therapy.
S-Phase Fraction and Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Are Better Markers for Distant Recurrences Than Nottingham Prognostic Index and Histologic Grade in a Prospective Study of Premenopausal Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer
Authors: Malmström P. , Bendahl P-O. , Boiesen P. , Brünner N. , Idvall I. , Fernö M. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Histologic grade, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status, and tumor size have previously been shown to be important prognostic indicators for distant recurrence of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the prognostic value of these factors with flow cytometric S-phase fraction (SPF), urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) in premenopausal patients with lymph node–negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 237 consecutive premenopausal patients with lymph node–negative breast cancer and freshly frozen tumor material available, SPF, ER and PgR status, uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1, histologic grade, and NPI were evaluated. RESULTS: SPF was univariately the most powerful prognostic factor for distant recurrence, followed by uPA, histologic grade, PgR, age, ER, NPI, and PAI-1, the latter being nonsignificant. Multivariate analysis revealed that neither NPI nor histologic grade was significant after adjustment for SPF, a fact that may be explained by the strong association between these factors. uPA was, however, an independent prognostic factor in addition to SPF, NPI, or histologic grade. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, SPF and uPA were found to be independent prognostic factors in premenopausal women with lymph node–negative breast cancer. We suggest that SPF, if performed under standardized conditions, can replace histologic grade as a selection instrument for adjuvant medical treatment. The value of the combination of SPF and uPA needs to be confirmed in an independent prospective trial.
Ondansetron Plus Metopimazine Compared With Ondansetron Plus Metopimazine Plus Prednisolone as Antiemetic Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving Multiple Cycles of Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy
Authors: Sigsgaard T. , Herrstedt J. , Handberg J. , Kjær M. , Dombernowsky P. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To compare the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of ondansetron plus metopimazine with ondansetron plus metopimazine plus prednisolone during nine cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 221 women with stage I or II breast cancer and no prior chemotherapy who were scheduled to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with intravenous cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil and methotrexate or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil given every 3 weeks were included in a double-blind parallel trial. Patients were randomized to 3 days of oral treatment with ondansetron plus metopimazine, or ondansetron plus metopimazine plus prednisolone. Ondansetron was administered as 8 mg bid, metopimazine as 30 mg qid, and prednisolone as 50 mg qd. RESULTS: In all, 216 patients (97.7%) were assessable for efficacy during a total of 1,462 cycles. In cycle 1, complete protection from emetic episodes/nausea day 1, days 2 through 5, and days 1 through 5 was achieved in 84.4%/51.4%, 82.6%/41.3%, and 79.8%/34.9% with ondansetron plus metopimazine and in 84.1%/57.0%, 86.8%/53.8%, and 79.4%/43.0% with ondansetron plus metopimazine plus prednisolone, respectively. In cycle 1, the three-drug combination was superior only in the treatment of nausea on days 2 through 5 (P = .0497). The cumulative emetic protection rate after nine cycles was 0.52 with ondansetron plus metopimazine and 0.75 with ondansetron plus metopimazine plus prednisolone. Side effects were generally few and mild with both treatments. Constipation was the only adverse event significantly more frequent with the three-drug combination (P = .029). CONCLUSION: Ondansetron plus metopimazine plus prednisolone is highly effective and superior to ondansetron plus metopimazine during nine cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.