bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
ODM-201, a new generation androgen receptor inhibitor for castration-resistant prostate cancer: Preclinical and phase I data.
Authors: Fizazi Karim , Massard Christophe , James Nicholas David , Culine Stephane , Jones Robert Hugh , Oksala Riikka , Moilanen Anu , Aho Eija , Ravanti Laura , Kallio Pekka 
Published: February 2017

65^ Background: Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is characterized by persistent, high level androgen receptor (AR) expression and resistance to conventional AR inhibitors. ODM-201 is a novel AR inhibitor with unique pharmacologic properties that has shown promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. Methods: AR binding affinity of ODM-201 to wild type AR was determined in cytosolic lysates obtained from ventral prostates of castrated rats using a competition binding assay. Additionally, effects of ODM-201 on the growth of castration resistant VCaP tumors was evaluated. Tumors were established by subcutaneous injection of VCaP prostate cancer cells into male nude mice. After initial tumor growth, mice were castrated. ODM-201 (50 mg/kg QD or BID orally) was initiated upon tumor regrowth. Since the risk of seizures has been reported for some second generation AR inhibitors, ODM-201 concentrations in mouse brain homogenates were studied after repeated oral administration to assess the risk. The clinical effects of ODM-201 (100, 200, 300, 500, 700, 900 mg BID) was examined in a Phase I/II dose-escalation trial in patients (N=24) with progressive metastatic CRPC. Results: ODM-201 binds to wild type AR with superior affinity compared to enzalutamide (Ki of 9 and 39 nM, respectively). In the VCaP CRPC model, ODM-201 significantly (p<0.001 compared to castrated control), and more efficiently than enzalutamide, inhibited tumor growth. After oral administration, tissue/plasma ratio of ODM-201 in mouse brain homogenates was negligible in all studied doses. In the Phase I/II clinical study, ODM-201 (100 to 700 mg results available) was well tolerated, and most commonly reported adverse events were asthenia, diarrhea and nausea. A PSA response (defined as ≥ 50% decrease) was obtained in 13/15 patients evaluable at 12 weeks with all patients achieving partial response or stable disease by RECIST/PCWG2 criteria. Conclusions: ODM-201 is a new generation AR inhibitor with superior preclinical efficacy compared to enzalutamide and bicalutamide, it does not enter the brain in preclinical studies, and it shows very promising activity and no significant toxicity in patients with CRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT01317641.
Development and validation of a mutivariate model combining cell cycle progression score with CAPRA to predict prostate cancer mortality in a conservatively managed cohort.
Authors: Brawer Michael K. , Cooperberg Matthew R. , Freedland Stephen J. , Swanson Gregory P. , Stone Steven , Reid Julia E. , Gutin Alexander , Carroll Peter , Cuzick Jack M. 
Published: February 2017

67 Background: Prostate cancer outcomes are variable and difficult to predict. Improved tools are needed to appropriately match treatment to a patient’s risk of progression. We developed and validated a multivariate model to predict disease−specific mortality (DSM) by combining clinical parameters (CAPRA score) with a score based on measuring the expression level of cell cycle progression (CCP) genes. Methods: A multivariate prediction model was trained using patients from 4 retrospective cohorts with median clinical follow up of 7.6 years. We used 200 men from the UK diagnosed after TURP, 353 from Scott & White and 388 from UCSF treated with radical prostatectomy, and 118 men from Durham VA treated with EBRT. CCP score was derived from fixed tumor tissue (biopsy or surgical resection). Outcome was either time from treatment to biochemical recurrence (US cohorts) or time from diagnosis to disease specific mortality (UK cohort). The model was validated for predicting time from diagnosis to DSM in 180 men from the UK diagnosed by needle biopsy with clinically localized prostate cancer and managed conservatively (mean/median CAPRA score = 6). Results: A model combining CAPRA with CCP score was fit in the training set by a Cox Proportional Hazards analysis stratified by cohort. The Combined score was defined as 0.39*CAPRA+0.57*CCP score. There were no significant interactions between cohort and CAPRA or CCP score. This suggests that both CCP score and CAPRA confer similar prognostic information regardless of cohort composition, treatment, or specific outcome. In the validation cohort the Combined score was highly prognostic (HR= 2.27, 95%CI: (1.63, 3.16), p = 1.2 x 10−7). By likelihood ratio testing, the Combined score was a better predictor of DSM than CAPRA alone (p = 0.0028). The c−index of the Combined score was 0.75, which was an improvement over CAPRA (c−index 0.71). Conclusions: This multivariate model predicts DSM in a conservatively treated cohort. The model provides prognostic information beyond clinical variables, and can be used to help differentiate aggressive from indolent cancer at diagnosis.
Degarelix versus LHRH agonists: Differential skeletal and urinary tract outcomes from an analysis of six comparative randomized clinical trials.
Authors: Crawford E. David , Shore Neal , Miller Kurt , Tombal Bertrand , Kathrup Cathrina , van der Meulen Egbert , Persson Bo-Eric 
Published: February 2017

68 Background: The use of ADT in men with prostate cancer is well established. GnRH antagonists have a mode of action distinct to that of LHRH agonists and comparative trials have shown differences in efficacy and safety between these agents. Adverse events (AE) from the musculoskeletal and renal and urinary systems have now been analysed. Methods: Results were pooled from 6 prospective, comparative randomised trials (n=2328). Most patients (pts) received 1 year of degarelix or LHRH agonist treatment (n=1686); the remaining men had 3–7 months’ treatment (n=642). AEs were analysed using Kaplan Meier plots and a log-rank test for homogeneity on relevant groups of MedDRA terms. Results: Treatment groups (degarelix, n=1491; LHRH agonist, n=837) were balanced for baseline characteristics such as age, testosterone, PSA and disease stage. In men with metastatic disease alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was reduced to a greater extent with degarelix (p=0.0373) throughout the year. Overall probability of fracture (<1% vs. 2%, p=0.0411) and incidence of joint related AEs (4% vs. 6%, p=0.0116) were significantly lower for degarelix-treated men. Incidence of muscle or bone pain was lower for degarelix (9% vs. 12%, p=0.0822). Incidence of urinary infections (UI) was reduced (5% vs. 8% with agonists) and time to first UI was significantly increased (p=0.0010) with degarelix. Overall probability of any renal or urinary tract AEs, including lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), was significantly lower in pts receiving degarelix (p<0.0001). Consistent with fewer skeletal and urinary tract AEs indicating better disease control, men with baseline PSA >50 ng/mL had significantly higher PSA PFS compared to agonist treated pts. OS during 1 year of treatment was significantly higher for degarelix pts (98.3% vs. 96.7%, p=0.0329). Conclusions: This analysis of 2,328 men shows degarelix-treated men had lower ALP, significantly fewer fractures, a lower incidence of urinary tract symptoms and higher overall survival than pts receiving an LHRH agonist over one year. Control of such disease symptoms is consistent with previous data on a significantly lower risk of PSA PFS during the first year of treatment.
Axitinib versus sorafenib as first‑line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
Authors: Hutson Thomas E. , Gallardo Jorge , Lesovoy Vladmir , Al-Shukri Salman , Stus Viktor , Bair A. H. , Rosbrook Brad , Bycott Paul W. , Tarazi Jamal Christo , Kim Sinil , Vogelzang Nicholas J. 
Published: February 2017

LBA348 Background: In the phase III AXIS trial, second-line therapy with axitinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib for mRCC. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial to compare PFS of axitinib vs sorafenib as first-line therapy. Methods: Patients with untreated, measurable (RECIST v1.0), clear‑cell mRCC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0 or 1 were randomized 2:1 to axitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) or sorafenib 400 mg BID. Randomization was stratified by PS. Primary endpoint was PFS per independent radiology committee. The study had 90% power to detect a 78% PFS improvement from 5.5 mo with sorafenib to 9.8 mo with axitinib, corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.561 (overall 1-sided α=0.025). Results: Patients (N=288) were mainly from Eastern Europe (51%), Asia (25%), North America (14%), or South America (10%).Patient baseline characteristics for axitinib (n=192) vs sorafenib (n=96) included: median age, 58y vs 58y; male, 70% vs 77%; white, 71% vs 69%; favorable risk, 49% vs 55%; PS 0, 57% vs 57%; nephrectomy, 85% vs 90%. Median (m) PFS was 10.1 vs 6.5 mo with axitinib vs sorafenib (HR adjusted for PS, 0.767; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.559–1.053; 1‑sided P=0.0377). In patients with PS 0 and 1, respectively, mPFS with axitinib vs sorafenib was 13.7 vs 6.6 mo (HR, 0.644; 95% CI, 0.419–0.991; 1‑sided P=0.022) and 6.5 vs 6.4 mo (HR, 0.931; 95% CI, 0.585–1.482; 1‑sided P=0.38). Objective response rates (ORRs) with axitinib vs sorafenib were 32.3% vs 14.6% (1‑sided P=0.0006 adjusted for PS). Overall survival data were not mature. All-grade all‑causality adverse events (≥20%) with axitinib vs sorafenib were diarrhea (50% vs 40%), hypertension (49% vs 29%), weight decreased (37% vs 24%), fatigue (33% vs 26%), decreased appetite (29% vs 19%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (26% vs 39%), dysphonia (23% vs 10%), asthenia (21% vs 16%), and hypothyroidism (21% vs 7%). Conclusions: The study did not achieve its primary endpoint statistically, but axitinib demonstrated numerically longer mPFS and significantly higher ORR vs sorafenib, with an acceptable safety profile, as first-line therapy for mRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT00920816.
Phase III trial (Prevention of Early Menopause Study [POEMS]-SWOG S0230) of LHRH analog during chemotherapy (CT) to reduce ovarian failure in early-stage, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: An international Intergroup trial of SWOG, IBCSG, ECOG, and CALGB (Alliance).
Authors: Moore Halle C. F. , Unger Joseph M. , Phillips Kelly-Anne , Boyle Frances M. , Hitre Erika , Porter David James , Francis Prudence A. , Minasian Lori M. , Gelber Richard D. , Goldstein Lori J. , Gomez Henry Leonidas , Vallejos Carlos , Partridge Ann H. , Dakhil Shaker R. , Martino Silvana , Barlow William E. , Fabian Carol J. , Meyskens Frank L. , Hortobagyi Gabriel N. , Albain Kathy S. 
Published: February 2017

LBA505 Background: Premature ovarian failure (POF) is a common toxicity of CT. Risk depends on type and amount of CT, age, and perhaps ovarian cycling at the time of CT. POEMS is a SWOG-coordinated phase III randomized study to evaluate whether LHRH analog administration with CT for early-stage breast cancer (BC) would reduce POF. Methods: Premenopausal patients (PT) age <50 with stage I-IIIA ER/PR-negative BC to be treated with CT were randomized to receive standard cyclophosphamide-containing CT with or without monthly goserelin (GN) 3.6 mg SQ starting 1 week prior to the first CT dose. The primary endpoint is 2-year POF, defined as amenorrhea for the prior 6 months and post-menopausal FSH. Other endpoints include pregnancies and survival. Endpoints were analyzed in multivariable regression adjusting for stratification factors (age and CT regimen). Results: Between 2/04 and 5/11, 257 PT enrolled. Among 218 evaluable PT, 62% had complete primary endpoint data. Dropouts (n=83) were mostly due to deaths (n=14) or lack of FSH data. There was no strong evidence of informative missing data by arm according to stratification factors (p>.05). POF rates were 22% in the standard arm and 8% in the GN arm (OR=0.30, 95% CI: 0.10-0.87, p=.03 [unadjusted analysis]; OR=0.36, 95%CI: 0.11-1.14, p=0.08 [adjusted logistic regression analysis]). In a sensitivity analysis defining 2-year POF more liberally as either amenorrhea or elevated FSH, 45% in the standard arm and 20% in the GN arm had POF (OR=0.29, 95% CI: 0.12-0.70, p=.006). There were 13 pregnancies in the standard arm and 22 in the GN arm (OR=2.22, 95% CI: 1.00-4.92, p=.05). DFS and OS were better in the GN arm (Cox regression, including stage: HR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-0.97, p=.04; HR=0.43, 95% CI: 0.18-1.00, p=.05, respectively). Conclusions: LHRH analog administration with CT was associated with less POF and more pregnancies. In an exploratory analysis, GN use in premenopausal ER-negative BC was associated with improved DFS and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT00068601.
A randomized phase 2 trial comparing efficacy of the combination of the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the antiangiogenic cediranib against olaparib alone in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
Authors: Liu Joyce , Barry William Thomas , Birrer Michael J. , Lee Jung-min , Buckanovich Ronald J. , Fleming Gini F. , Rimel Bj , Buss Mary K. , Nattam Sreenivasa R. , Hurteau Jean , Luo Weixiu , Quy Philippa , Obermayer Elizabeth , Whalen Christin , Lee Hang , Winer Eric P. , Kohn Elise C. , Ivy S. Percy , Matulonis Ursula 
Published: February 2017

LBA5500 Background: PARP inhibitors and anti-angiogenics are clinically active in recurrent ovarian cancer (OvCa). Preclinical studies suggest these agents can synergize, and a phase 1 study showed that the combination of cediranib (ced) and olaparib (olap) is well-tolerated. We therefore compared the activity of olap alone (Olap) to combined ced and olap (Ced/Olap) in treatment of recurrent platinum-sensitive (plat-sens) high-grade serous (HGS) or BRCA-related OvCa (NCT 01116648). Methods: Patients (pts) across 9 centers were randomized 1:1 in this Ph 2 open label study to Olap (olap 400 mg capsules BID) or Ced/Olap (olap 200 mg capsules BID; ced 30 mg daily), stratified by BRCA status and prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Eligibility included pts with recurrent plat-sens HGS or BRCA-related OvCa. Pts had measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, PS 0 or 1, and the ability to take POs. No prior anti-angiogenics in the recurrent setting or prior PARP inhibitor was allowed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from randomization to radiographic progression or death. With a target N=90 pts, the study was powered to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.75 (median PFS 6 vs 10.5 mo). Results: Pts were enrolled from Oct 2011 to Jun 2013: 46 to Olap, 44 to Ced/Olap. 48 pts were known BRCA carriers (25 Olap; 23 Ced/Olap). At a planned interim analysis the DSMB recommended release of data. As of Jan 7, 2014, 41 pts had a PFS event. Median PFS was 9.0 mos for Olap and 17.7 mos for Ced/Olap (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.6, p = 0.001). There were 2 complete responses (CR) and 21 partial responses (PR) in pts on Olap (56% objective response rate, ORR) and 3 CRs and 33 PRs in pts on Ced/Olap (84% ORR, p = 0.008). The overall rate of Gr3/4 toxicity was higher for pts on Ced/Olap (70%) than on Olap (7%). Differentially occurring toxicities included fatigue (27% Ced/Olap vs 7% Olap), diarrhea (23% vs 0%), and hypertension (39% vs 0%). Updated efficacy and exploratory subgroup analyses will be presented. Conclusions: Combined Ced/Olap significantly extended PFS and ORR compared to Olap in plat-sens OvCa. Further studies of this oral combination in plat-sens OvCa are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01116648.
Survival, response duration, and activity by BRAF mutation (MT) status of nivolumab (NIVO, anti-PD-1, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) and ipilimumab (IPI) concurrent therapy in advanced melanoma (MEL).
Authors: Sznol Mario , Kluger Harriet M. , Callahan Margaret K. , Postow Michael Andrew , Gordon Ruth Ann , Segal Neil Howard , Rizvi Naiyer A. , Lesokhin Alexander M. , Atkins Michael B. , Kirkwood John M. , Burke Matthew M. , Ralabate Amanda L. , Rivera Angel L. , Kronenberg Stephanie Anne , Agunwamba Blessing , Feely William , Hong Quan , Krishnan Suba , Gupta Ashok Kumar , Wolchok Jedd D. 
Published: February 2017

LBA9003^ Background: We report updated survival and clinical activity in initially enrolled cohorts and activity by BRAF MT status in a phase I trial of concurrent and sequenced NIVO + IPI. Methods: MEL pts (n=53, enrolled 2009-2012, data analysis Dec 2013) with ≤3 prior therapies received IV concurrent NIVO + IPI, Q3Wk × 4 doses, followed by NIVO Q3Wk × 4. At wk 24, NIVO + IPI continued Q12Wk × 8 in pts with disease control and no DLT. Tumor responses were evaluated by WHO and immune-related criteria. Results: Pt characteristics included stage M1c: 55% and prior systemic therapy: 40%. Across doses, 1- and 2-y OS rates were 82% and 75%. Clinical activity was similar to previous reports except CRs rose to 9/53 (17%). Pts with/without tumor BRAF MT (n=36) had similar activity (Table). By wk 36, 42% demonstrated ≥80% tumor reduction. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (NR). Of 22 pts with objective response, 14 (64%) had DOR ≥24 wk (range: 25+, 106+). Treatment-related adverse events were as reported previously: grade 3-4, 53% of pts; most common: ↑ lipase and AST (13% ea). Data for sequenced cohorts are shown (Table). Conclusions: Concurrent NIVO + IPI therapy showed encouraging survival and a manageable safety profile in advanced MEL pts. Responses were observed regardless of BRAF MT status and were durable in the majority of pts. Forty additional pts were enrolled (last pt: Nov 2013) on a cohort of NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg Q3Wk × 4 doses, followed by NIVO 3mg/kg Q2Wk (the selected regimen for phase II/III trials). Clinical trial information: NCT01024231. [Table: see text]
Ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of stage III melanoma: Initial efficacy and safety results from the EORTC 18071 phase III trial.
Authors: Eggermont Alexander M. , Chiarion-Sileni Vanna , Grob Jean Jacques , Dummer Reinhard , Wolchok Jedd D. , Schmidt Henrik , Hamid Omid , Robert Caroline , Ascierto Paolo Antonio , Richards Jon M. , Lebbe Celeste , Ferraresi Virginia , Smylie Michael , Weber Jeffrey S. , Maio Michele , Konto Cyril , Karra Gurunath Ravichandra , de Pril Veerle , Suciu Stefan , Testori Alessandro 
Published: February 2017

LBA9008 Background: Ipilimumab (Ipi), a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 to augment antitumor immune responses, is an approved treatment for advanced melanoma. Here, we report the results of a phase III trial designed to evaluate Ipi as an adjuvant therapy for resected stage III melanoma at high risk of recurrence. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind trial, eligible patients (pts) included those ≥18 yrs of age who underwent complete resection of stage III cutaneous melanoma (excluding lymph node metastasis ≤1 mm or in-transit metastasis). 951 pts were randomized (stratified by stage and region) 1:1 to receive Ipi 10 mg/kg (n=475) or placebo (Pbo, n=476) every 3 wks for 4 doses, then every 3 mos for up to 3 yrs until completion, disease recurrence, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), analyzed on the intent-to-treat population. 512 RFS events (recurrence or death) were needed to provide 90% power to detect an Ipi vs Pbo hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (2-sided α=5%). Results: Overall, 20%/44%/36% of pts had stage IIIA/IIIB/IIIC, 42% ulcerated primary, and 58% macroscopic lymph node involvement. At a median follow-up of 2.7 yrs, Ipi significantly improved RFS vs Pbo. RFS benefit was consistent across subgroups (e.g., stage IIIB or IIIC, ulcerated primary). Most common grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in the Ipi and Pbo arms were gastrointestinal (15.9% vs 0.8%), hepatic (10.6% vs 0.2%), and endocrine (8.5% vs 0%). Most irAEs were managed and resolved using established algorithms. Of 471 pts who started Ipi, 245 (52%) discontinued treatment due to AEs [182 (38.6%) within 12 weeks]; 5 (1.1%) died due to drug-related AEs. Conclusions: In this phase III trial, Ipi as adjuvant therapy provided a clinically and statistically significant improvement in RFS vs Pbo for pts with stage III melanoma at high risk of recurrence. AE profile was generally consistent with that observed in advanced melanoma, although with a higher incidence of endocrinopathies. Clinical trial information: NCT00636168. EudraCT Number: 2007-001974-10. [Table: see text]
Managing comorbidities in oncology: A multisite randomized controlled trial of continuing versus discontinuing statins in the setting of life-limiting illness.
Authors: Abernethy Amy Pickar , Kutner Jean , Blatchford Patrick Jud , Ritchie Christine , Fairclough Diane , Hanson Laura , Bull Janet ,   PCRC Investigators
Published: February 2017

LBA9514 Background: For patients with life-threatening illness such as advanced cancer, optimal management of longstanding medications prescribed for comorbid illness is uncertain. Risks may outweigh benefits; e.g., benefits from HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors (“statins”) may take years to accrue and may not be relevant for a person with limited prognosis. Is it safe to discontinue statins for the patient with less than a year to live? Methods: This was a multicenter, unblinded pragmatic trial. At enrollment, participants were randomized (1:1) to discontinue or continue their statin medication. Eligible patients were adults with advanced life-limiting illness on a statin for ≥3 months for primary or secondary prevention, a life expectancy of greater than one month, and evidence of recent deterioration in performance status. Outcomes measured at baseline and at least monthly included survival, cardiovascular-related events, quality of life (QOL), symptoms, and polypharmacy. Rate of death within 60 days of randomization was the primary outcome. Results: 381 patients were enrolled (189 discontinue statins; 192 continue statins). Mean age was 74 years (SD 12); 22% were cognitively impaired; 49% had cancer as the primary diagnosis; and, 69% had used statins for >5 years. Rate of death within 60 days was not statistically different between groups (discontinue vs. continue, 23.8% vs. 20.3%, 90% CI -3.5% to 10.5%, p=0.36). The group discontinuing statins had longer median time-to-death (229 days [90% CI 186–332] vs. 190 days [90% CI 170-257]; p=0.60). Total QOL was significantly better among the group discontinuing statins (McGill QOL: 7.11 vs. 6.85, p=0.037) and there were fewer symptoms in this group (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale: 25.2 vs. 27.4, p=0.128). People in the discontinue statins group took significantly fewer medications (10.1 vs. 10.8, p = 0.034). Few participants in either group experienced cardiovascular events (13 vs. 11). Conclusions: In the setting of life-limiting illness such as advanced cancer, it is unlikely that harm will accrue when statins being used for primary or secondary prevention are discontinued; these patients may even benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT01415934.