bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and partial cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer.
Authors: Herr H W , Scher H I 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE This clinical trial evaluated a bladder-sparing strategy using a combined modality approach of neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) chemotherapy followed by a partial cystectomy for patients with invasive (T2-4N0M0) bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred eleven surgical candidates received a median of four cycles of neoadjuvant M-VAC. Following treatment, of those with a favorable response to chemotherapy based on cystoscopic examination, 26 underwent a partial cystectomy. RESULTS Of 26 patients, 17 (65%) are alive beyond 5 years (median, 6.9 years; range, 4 to 8), including 14 (54%) with an intact, functioning bladder. Twelve patients (46%) developed bladder recurrences, which were invasive in five (18%) and superficial in seven (26%). Patients with no (P0) or noninvasive (Pis) tumor in their surgical specimens had a 5-year survival rate of 87% (14 of 16), compared with 30% (three of 10) among patients with residual invasive cancer. The majority of deaths was attributed to preexisting metastases. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant M-VAC chemotherapy permitted bladder-sparing surgery in selected responding patients with invasive bladder neoplasms. The bladder remained at risk for new tumor development, but local recurrences were treated successfully by local therapy or salvage cystectomy.
Surgical treatment of primary lung cancer in patients less than 40 years of age.
Authors: Shimono T , Hayashi T , Kimura M , Yada I , Namikawa S , Yuasa H , Kusagawa M 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE AND METHODS The major purpose of this study was to determine whether the survival rate in young lung cancer patients after surgical treatment differs from that in older patients. An analysis was performed for all patients with bronchogenic carcinoma who underwent surgery at Mie University Hospital from 1965 to 1990. RESULTS Of 803 patients, 24 (2.99%) were 33 to 39 years old. At the time of surgery, the disease was diagnosed as stage I in seven patients (29%), stage II in four (17%), stage IIIa in seven (29%), stage IIIb in two (8%), and stage IV in four (17%), while 46.3% of the patients older than 40 years of age had either stage IIIa, IIIb, or IV disease. All of the 24 patients less than 40 years of age underwent thoracotomy: curative resection in 14 cases, palliative resection in sex, and probe-thoracotomy in four. The 5-year survival rate for all stages of disease was 31.4% in these 24 patients, and 41.9% in 603 patients greater than 40 years of age. The 5-year survival rate for stage I disease was 35.7% in the seven younger patients and 78.0% in the 207 older patients; for stage II, it was 25.5% in the four younger patients and 40.6% in the 98 older patients; for stage III, it was 33.3% in the nine younger patients and 15.6% in the 250 older patients; and for stage IV, it was 25% in the four younger patients and 6.6% in the 48 older patients. There were no significant differences in survival rate between the two age groups for all patients or for those with each stage of disease. CONCLUSION Although younger patients tended to have more advanced disease, long-term survival in these patients did not differ from that of older patients.
Cisplatin, vinblastine, and hydrazine sulfate in advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.
Authors: Kosty M P , Fleishman S B , Herndon J E , Coughlin K , Kornblith A B , Scalzo A , Morris J C , Mortimer J , Green M R 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To assess the chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin, vinblastine, and hydrazine sulfate administered to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind phase III study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between July 25, 1989 and February 1, 1991, 291 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and performance status 0 or 1 were randomized to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) every 28 days, vinblastine 5 mg/m2 IV per week times five, then every 2 weeks; and either hydrazine sulfate 60 mg three times per day orally or placebo. The concurrent use of corticosteroids, medroxyprogesterone, or other appetite stimulants was not permitted. Treatment groups were comparable for known prognostic variables. The primary end point of this study was survival; however, the influence of hydrazine sulfate on nutritional status, performance status, and quality of life was also assessed. RESULTS Analysis of 266 eligible patients showed a median survival duration of 7.78 months for the hydrazine sulfate-treated group compared with 7.70 months for the placebo-treated group (P = .65, log-rank). Objective response rates were similar for the two groups, with 4% complete responses, 20% partial responses, and 2% regressions in those treated with hydrazine sulfate; 3% complete responses, 23% partial responses, and 2% regressions in those who received placebo. The major toxicity was severe or life-threatening neutropenia, which occurred in 65% of hydrazine sulfate patients and 63% of placebo patients. There were no differences noted between the two groups in degree of anorexia, weight gain or loss, or overall nutritional status. Sensory and motor neuropathy occurred significantly more often in patients treated with hydrazine sulfate. Quality of life was significantly worse in patients who received hydrazine sulfate. CONCLUSION This study suggests no benefit from the addition of hydrazine sulfate to an effective cytotoxic regimen.
Placebo-controlled trial of hydrazine sulfate in patients with newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer.
Authors: Loprinzi C L , Goldberg R M , Su J Q , Mailliard J A , Kuross S A , Maksymiuk A W , Kugler J W , Jett J R , Ghosh C , Pfeifle D M 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE Hydrazine sulfate, an agent that appears to inhibit gluconeogenesis, has been studied in cancer patients for approximately 20 years. There was a recent resurgence of interest in this drug when subset analysis of a small placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial reported improved survival among non-small-cell lung cancer patients with a good performance status who were randomized to receive this drug along with standard chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients on this trial had newly diagnosed, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer and were treated with cisplatin and etoposide. In addition, they were randomized to receive hydrazine sulfate or placebo in a double-blind manner. RESULTS A total of 243 patients were randomized. Response rates were similar in the two treatment arms. There were trends for worse time to progression and survival in the hydrazine sulfate arm. No significant differences were noted in the two study arms with regard to toxicity or quality of life (QL). CONCLUSION This trial failed to demonstrate any benefit for patients who received hydrazine sulfate.
Adjuvant CYVADIC chemotherapy for adult soft tissue sarcoma--reduced local recurrence but no improvement in survival: a study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group.
Authors: Bramwell V , Rouesse J , Steward W , Santoro A , Schraffordt-Koops H , Buesa J , Ruka W , Priario J , Wagener T , Burgers M 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To evaluate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas. The principal end points were freedom from local recurrence and/or metastases and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1977 and June 1988, 468 patients entered this randomized study and 317 were considered eligible. Following complete surgical resection with or without radiotherapy, outcome in 145 eligible patients receiving cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) bolus on day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) 50 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, and dacarbazine (DTIC) 400 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion on days 1 to 3 (CYVADIC) cycles repeated every 28 days for eight courses was compared with that in 172 control patients. RESULTS With a median follow-up duration of 80 months (range, 39 to 165), actuarial percentage survival figures at 7 years were compared. Relapse-free survival rates were higher for CYVADIC, 56% versus 43% (P = .007), and local recurrence was significantly reduced in the CYVADIC arm at 17% versus 31% (P = .004). In contrast, distant metastases occurred with similar frequency in both arms, 32% for CYVADIC versus 36% for control patients (P = .42), and overall survival rates were not significantly different at 63% versus 56% (P = .64). A reduction in local recurrence was only apparent in the group of head, neck, and trunk sarcomas (P = .002), but not in limb tumors (P = .31). CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemotherapy with CYVADIC cannot be recommended outside the context of a clinical trial. Experience from this study has been used to plan a trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/ifosfamide, which is currently in progress.
Incidence of neutropenic fever in patients treated with standard-dose combination chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer and the cost impact of treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Authors: Nichols C R , Fox E P , Roth B J , Williams S D , Loehrer P J , Einhorn L H 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE We sought to determine the incidence of neutropenic fever associated with the use of standard-dose combination chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and to use these data as a template to analyze the costs and benefits of the routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed records of 137 consecutive, unselected patients with SCLC treated with combination chemotherapy from January 1987 to March 1992. Admission criteria for neutropenic fever were temperature > or = 38.5 degrees C and an absolute neutrophil count < or = 500/microL. Neutropenic fevers were managed with a 25% dose reduction of the myelosuppressive drugs in subsequent cycles. Charge estimates for hospitalization ($1,244 per day) and G-CSF use ($2,027 per course) were estimated by reviewing charges to patients at Indiana University hospitalized for neutropenic fever or treated with outpatient G-CSF. We imposed assumptions from the Neupogen (filgrastim; Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA) licensing trial regarding the effectiveness of G-CSF and the Indiana University charge estimates on three models of G-CSF use: (1) preemptive--with all courses of chemotherapy, (2) reactive--with all cycles of chemotherapy following a neutropenic fever, and (3) dose reduction only (no G-CSF)--to derive charge estimates for G-CSF use. RESULTS Records of 137 patients with SCLC were identified and reviewed. The incidence of neutropenic fever was 12% in the first cycle of chemotherapy, and 18% overall, compared with the placebo- and G-CSF-treated arms of the Neupogen licensing trial, in which the incidence of neutropenic fever was 77% and 40%, respectively. Other therapeutic outcomes, such as neutropenic septic deaths, response rates, and survival, were comparable. We derived the following charge estimates for the three models of G-CSF: (1) preemptive--total charges = $1,287,481; (2) reactive--total charges = $276,154; and (3) dose reduction only--total charges = $192,820. CONCLUSION The incidence of neutropenic fever with standard-dose chemotherapy for SCLC was 18%. Routine use of G-CSF in SCLC patients treated with standard-dose chemotherapy appears to be expensive and is not associated with an obvious therapeutic benefit or cost savings. We suggest that careful analysis of the incidence of infectious complications, rather than granulocyte nadir and duration, be performed, and that clinical guidelines for the use of these effective, but expensive, products be developed.
Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: discordance between physicians' perception of benefit and the results of clinical trials.
Authors: Rajagopal S , Goodman P J , Tannock I F 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE Decisions about management of patients depend on the perception of physicians about the results of clinical trials. We therefore determined whether physicians would recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for specified patients with breast cancer, and whether the perceived levels of benefit that led to these decisions were supported by the results of clinical trials. METHODS We mailed a questionnaire that presented two clinical scenarios to 515 American and European oncologists. Scenario A depicted a premenopausal woman with node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer, and scenario B depicted a post-menopausal woman with node-positive, ER- disease. Respondents were asked about the evidence that they required from clinical trials to recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for these patients. RESULTS Replies were received from 307 oncologists. American respondents were more likely to recommend adjuvant chemotherapy than Europeans (A, 93% v 68%; B, 85% v 67%; P < .001 for both comparisons). Opinion was evenly divided as to whether improvement in the relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was sufficient to recommend treatment, or whether improvement in overall survival was necessary. Mean values of 12.9% to 14.6% improvement in RFS at 3 years, or 10.7% to 12.4% improvement in overall survival at 5 years, were required to offer treatment. An overview analysis of clinical trials suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy achieves absolute improvements of 6% to 9% in RFS rates at 3 years and 3% to 4% in overall survival rates at 5 years for patients in these scenarios. CONCLUSIONS Most oncologists recommended treatment in these scenarios, but require a level of treatment effect that has not been demonstrated in clinical trials. Our results suggest that oncologists' perceptions of the results of clinical trials overestimate the therapeutic gain from use of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Psychosocial adjustment among women with breast cancer stages I and II: six-year follow-up of consecutive patients.
Authors: Omne-Pontén M , Holmberg L , Sjödén P O 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To evaluate, in a long-term follow-up study of consecutive patients (N = 99), the impact of surgery--breast-conserving treatment (BCT) versus mastectomy (MT)--on psychosocial adjustment among women with breast cancer, pTNM stage I/II. PATIENTS AND METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted at a median of 6 years (range, 5.8 to 8.1) after primary surgery. Sixty-six women were available for the long-term follow-up study. Twenty-six women had been treated with BCT and 40 with MT. RESULTS No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups concerning psychosocial adjustment, as measured by the Social adjustment Scale (SAS). In general, the levels of maladjustment were lower than at 13 months postoperatively, but 10% still showed maladjustment. Sixty percent of the women were unwilling to show themselves naked, and 22% felt that they had become less attractive because of the surgical treatment. In an explorative part of the interview, 68% of the women complained about how they had been informed of the diagnosis. A tendency toward a significant difference was found in the relation between previous maladjustment and a negative experience at the time of diagnosis (P = .07). CONCLUSION Few data are available on long-term follow-up results with regard to psychosocial adjustment among women after breast cancer surgery. This study provides the important information that there are no differences in patient psychosocial adjustment that can be ascribed to the type of surgery at 6-year follow-up evaluation.
Fundamental dilemmas of the randomized clinical trial process: results of a survey of the 1,737 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group investigators.
Authors: Taylor K M , Feldstein M L , Skeel R T , Pandya K J , Ng P , Carbone P P 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE We studied oncologists' attitudes and behavior with regard to their participation in randomized clinical trials. METHODS We surveyed the 1,737 physician members of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) using the Physician Orientation Profile (POP), a self-administered mailed questionnaire. A response rate of 86% was achieved (1,485 of 1,737); each physician's actual patient accrual was recorded. RESULTS All respondents indicated that they had a systematic pattern of patient preselection for entry onto trials beyond the formal inclusion/exclusion trial criteria. Eighty-nine percent stated that improving patient quality of life rather than prolonging survival was more personally satisfying. Sixty-two percent did not enter a single patient during the 12-month period following the survey, while 10% entered 80% of all patients during that time. Physicians overestimated their accrual rate by a factor of 6. Eighty-three percent defined randomization and adherence to trial protocol as a serious challenge to their ability to make individualized treatment decisions. CONCLUSION This study raises questions regarding the following: (1) the perceived generalizability of trial findings, (2) the role of end points other than survival for clinical trials, (3) the consequences of physician overestimation of patient accrual, and (4) the impact of randomized trials on the behavior of clinicians. Further investigation into these critical issues will provide meaningful recommendations to enhance the future design, implementation, and conduct of randomized clinical trials in cancer.
Phase I and pharmacologic study of irinotecan and etoposide with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support for advanced lung cancer.
Authors: Masuda N , Fukuoka M , Kudoh S , Matsui K , Kusunoki Y , Takada M , Nakagawa K , Hirashima T , Tsukada H , Yana T 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE We conducted a phase I trial of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, combined with etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) support because of the overlapping neutrophil toxicity of both drugs. The aim was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of CPT-11 combined with a fixed dose of etoposide in patients with advanced lung cancer, as well as the dose-limiting toxicities of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-five patients with stage III or IV lung cancer, 15 (60%) with prior chemotherapy, were treated at 4-week intervals using CPT-11 (90-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15) plus etoposide (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 3). In addition, rhG-CSF (2 micrograms/kg/d) was given from day 4 to day 21, except on the days of CPT-11 administration. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m2, and it was escalated in 10-mg/m2 increments until the maximum-tolerated dose was reached. RESULTS The maximum-tolerated dose of CPT-11 was 90 mg/m2, since two of the three patients developed grade 3 to 4 leukopenia or grade 3 to 4 diarrhea during the first cycle of treatment at this dose level. Diarrhea and leukopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities, while thrombocytopenia was only a moderate problem. Elimination of CPT-11 was biphasic, with a mean +/- SD beta half-life of 18.17 +/- 9.09 hours. The mean terminal half-life of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38; the major metabolite of CPT-11) was 43.40 +/- 37.84 hours. There was one complete response (5%) and eight partial responses (38%) among 21 assessable patients, for an overall response rate of 43%. The response rates for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were 58% (seven of 12 patients) and 22% (two of nine patients), respectively. CONCLUSION The combination of CPT-11 and etoposide with rhG-CSF support seems to be active against lung cancer, especially SCLC, with acceptable toxicity. The recommended dose for phase II studies in previously untreated patients is 80 mg/m2 of CPT-11 (days 1, 8, and 15) and 80 mg/m2 of etoposide (days 1 to 3) plus 2 micrograms/kg of rhG-CSF (days 4 to 21, except when CPT-11 is given). In addition, 70 mg/m2 of CPT-11 appears to be the appropriate dose for previously treated patients receiving this regimen.
Corticosteroid-induced magnetic resonance imaging changes in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.
Authors: Watling C J , Lee D H , Macdonald D R , Cairncross J G 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE We studied corticosteroid-induced magnetic resonance (MR) scan changes in patients with recurrent malignant glioma to determine if corticosteroid therapy started concurrently with investigational treatment might yield false-positive responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ten symptomatic patients not on corticosteroids when malignant glioma recurred had a baseline MR scan performed before corticosteroid treatment, followed by serial scans at weekly intervals for 1 month while on dexamethasone (16 mg/d). The maximum cross-sectional areas and volumes of the gadolinium-enhancing regions (tumor) and T2-weighted abnormalities (tumor plus edema) were compared quantitatively and qualitatively for each series of scans. RESULTS Nine of 10 patients (90%) had a measurable reduction in the size of the gadolinium-enhancing region or T2-weighted abnormality with corticosteroid treatment. The maximum cross-sectional area and volume of the gadolinium-enhancing region decreased by at least 25% in three of 10 patients (30%). The maximum cross-sectional area and volume of the T2-weighted abnormality decreased by at least 25% in five of 10 patients (50%). Maximum measurable radiologic improvement was evident within 2 weeks in most patients. MR scans were judged improved by the reporting neuroradiologist in seven of 10 (70%). These subjective visual improvements were also evident within 2 weeks, but generally described as slight or modest. CONCLUSION Corticosteroid-induced MR scan reductions in tumor size may confound the assessment of response of recurrent malignant gliomas to investigational agents. For patients who start corticosteroids for symptom control, investigational treatment should be delayed until a new baseline MR image is established 2 weeks later. Response is then judged by comparing subsequent MR scans with the new corticosteroid-influenced baseline image.
Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion topotecan in children: systemic exposure predicts hematologic toxicity.
Authors: Stewart C F , Baker S D , Heideman R L , Jones D , Crom W R , Pratt C B 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE Topotecan pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were studied following a 72-hour continuous infusion in 20 children with cancer (median age, 8 years; range, 3.5 to 18). METHODS Serial plasma and urine samples were collected during the infusion and for up to 6 hours following the end of infusion. Topotecan (lactone) and total (lactone plus hydroxy acid) concentrations were determined by a sensitive and specific high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay with fluorescence detection. Using maximum a posteriori-Bayesian modeling, lactone and total plasma concentrations were described separately by a two-compartment model. Hematologic toxicity was expressed as the percent decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelet count. The relation between systemic exposure (SE) and hematologic toxicity was modeled using a sigmoid maximum-effect model. RESULTS Systemic clearance rates for lactone and total topotecan were (mean +/- SD) 18.5 +/- 7.0 and 6.5 +/- 2.4 L/h/m2, respectively. Urinary recovery of total topotecan was (mean +/- SD) 67.5% +/- 25.2% (n = 12 patients). SE (area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity [AUC] or steady-state plasma concentration [Cpss]) to either topotecan lactone or total topotecan was significantly correlated to hematologic toxicity (P < .05). Overall, patients with a higher SE to topotecan experienced greater hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION These data demonstrate a relation between systemic exposure to topotecan and clinical effect (myelosuppression). Moreover, these data provide the basis for development of individualized topotecan administration schedules.