Impact of using scatter‐mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation‐protective garments
Authors: Jones A. Kyle , Pasciak Alexander S. , Wagner Louis K. 
Published: January 2018

PurposeUse standardized methods to determine how assessment of protective value of radiation‐protective garments changes under conditions employing standard beam qualities, scatter‐mimicking primary beams, and a modified Hp(10) measurement.MethodsThe shielding properties of radiation‐protective garments depend on the spectrum of beam energies striking the garment and the attenuation properties of materials used to construct the garment, including x‐ray fluorescence produced by these materials. In this study the primary beam spectra employed during clinical interventional radiology and cardiology procedures (clinical primary beams, CPB) were identified using radiation dose structured reports (RDSR) and fluoroscope log data. Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine the scattered radiation spectra produced by these CPB during typical clinical application. For these scattered spectra, scatter‐mimicking primary beams (SMPB) were determined using numerical optimization‐based spectral reconstruction that adjusted kV and filtration to produce the SMPB that optimally matched the scattered spectrum for each CPB. The penetration of a subset of SMPB through four radiation‐protective garments of varying compositions and nominal thicknesses was measured using a geometry specified by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). The diagnostic radiological index of protection (DRIP), which increases with increasing penetration through a garment, was calculated using these measurements. Penetration through the same garments was measured for standard beams specified by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM). Finally, 10 mm of PMMA was affixed to the inside of each garment and the DRIP remeasured in this configuration to simulate Hp(10).ResultsThe SMPB based on actual CPB were in general characterized by lower kV (range 60–76) and higher half‐value layer (HVL, range 3.44–4.89 mm Al) than standard beam qualities specified by ASTM (kV range 70–85; HVL range 3.4–4.0 mm Al). A lead garment of nominal thickness 0.5 mm (D) had a DRIP of 0.8%, two lead‐free garments of 0.5 mm nominal thickness had DRIPs of 1.2% (A) and 2.2% (B), and a lead‐free bilayer (C) had a DRIP of 1.4%. When standard beam qualities specified by the ASTM were used, the DRIP for D was 2.2%, 175% higher than the DRIP measured using SMPB, and for A, B, and C was 2.8%, 3.2%, and 2.9%, respectively. This was 133%, 45%, and 107% higher than the DRIP measured using SMPB. Differences between the DRIP of lead‐alternative garments and the lead garment were reduced when measured with 10 mm of PMMA. Using this method, the measured DRIPs were 2.2% (A), 3.1% (B), 2.5% (C), and 2.3% (D).ConclusionsPenetration of radiation through radiation‐protective garments depended strongly on the methods and X‐ray spectra used for evaluation. The DRIP was higher (i.e., protective value was lower) for lead‐alternative garments than for lead garments in this evaluation. The DRIP was lower for all garments when SMPB based on actual clinical beam quality data were used to measure penetration compared to ASTM standard beams. Differences in penetration between lead‐alternative and lead garments were less when the DRIP was measured with 10 mm of PMMA between the garment and the chamber.