bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Radiation skyshine from a 6 MeV medical accelerator
Authors: Gossman Michael S. , McGinley Patton H. , Rising Mary B. , Pahikkala A. Jussi 
Published: February 2017

This study assesses the dose level from skyshine produced by a 6 MeV medical accelerator. The analysis of data collected on skyshine yields professional guidance for future investigators as they attempt to quantify and qualify radiation protection concerns in shielding therapy vaults. Survey measurements using various field sizes and at varying distances from a primary barrier have enabled us to identify unique skyshine behavior in comparison to other energies already seen in literature. In order to correctly quantify such measurements outside a shielded barrier, one must take into consideration the fact that a skyshine maximum may not be observed at the same distance for all field sizes. A physical attribute of the skyshine scatter component was shown to increase to a maximum value at 4.6 m from the barrier for the largest field size used. We recommend that the largest field sizes be used in the field for the determination of skyshine effect and that the peak value be further analyzed specifically when considering shielding designs.PACS numbers: 87.52.‐g, 87.52.Df, 87.52.Tr, 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Dq, 87.66.‐a, 89., 89.60.+x
Evaluation of the setup accuracy of a stereotactic radiotherapy head immobilization mask system using kV on‐board imaging
Authors: Ali Imad , Tubbs Jesse , Hibbitts Kerry , Algan Ozer , Thompson Spencer , Herman Terence , Ahmad Salahuddin 
Published: February 2017

The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup accuracy and quantify random and systematic errors of the BrainLAB stereotactic immobilization mask and localization system using kV on‐board imaging. Nine patients were simulated and set up with the BrainLAB stereotactic head immobilization mask and localizer to be treated for brain lesions using single and hypofractions. Orthogonal pairs of projections were acquired using a kV on‐board imager mounted on a Varian Trilogy machine. The kV projections were then registered with digitally‐reconstructed radiographs (DRR) obtained from treatment planning. Shifts between the kV images and reference DRRs were calculated in the different directions: anterior‐posterior (A‐P), medial‐lateral (R‐L) and superior‐inferior (S‐I). If the shifts were larger than 2 mm in any direction, the patient was reset within the immobilization mask until satisfying setup accuracy based on image guidance has been achieved. Shifts as large as 4.5 mm, 5.0 mm, 8.0 mm in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, were measured from image registration of kV projections and DRRs. These shifts represent offsets between the treatment and simulation setup using immobilization mask. The mean offsets of 0.1 mm, 0.7 mm, and represent systematic errors of the BrainLAB localizer in the A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively. The mean of the radial shifts is about 1.7 mm. The standard deviations of the shifts were 2.2 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.6 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions, respectively, which represent random patient setup errors with the BrainLAB mask. The BrainLAB mask provides a noninvasive, practical and flexible immobilization system that keeps the patients in place during treatment. Relying on this system for patient setup might be associated with significant setup errors. Image guidance with the kV on‐board imager provides an independent verification technique to ensure accuracy of patient setup. Since the patient may relax or move during treatment, uncontrolled and undetected setup errors may be produced with patients that are not well‐immobilized. Therefore, the combination of stereotactic immobilization and image guidance achieves more controlled and accurate patient setup within 2 mm in A‐P, R‐L and S‐I directions.PACS numbers: 87.56.‐v, 87.56.Da
Evaluation of the interfractional biological effective dose (BED) variation in MammoSite high dose rate brachytherapy
Authors: Kim Yongbok , Werts E. Day , Trombetta Mark G. , Miften Moyed 
Published: February 2017

The objective of this work is to evaluate the interfractional biological effective dose (BED) variation in MammoSite high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Dose distributions of 19 patients who received 34 Gy in 10 fractions were evaluated. A method was employed to account for nonuniform dose distribution in the BED calculation. Furthermore, a range of α/β values was utilized for specific clinical end points: fibrosis, telangiectasia, erythema, desquamation and breast carcinoma. Two scenarios were simulated to calculate the BED value using: i) the same dose distribution of fraction 1 over fractions 2–10 (constant case, CC), and ii) the actual delivered dose distribution for each fraction 1–10 (interfraction dose variation case, IVC). Although the average BED difference (IVC – CC) was Gy for all clinical endpoints, the range of difference for fibrosis and telangiectasia reached to and to for one of the patients, respectively. By disregarding high inhomogeneity in HDR brachytherapy, the conventional BED calculation tends to overestimate the BED for fibrosis by 16% on average, while it underestimates the BED for erythema (7.6%) and desquamation (10.2%). In conclusion, the BED calculation accounting for the nonuniform dose distribution provides a more clinically relevant description of the clinical delivered dose. Though the average BED difference was clinically insignificant, the maximum difference of BED for late effects can differ by a single fractional dose (10%) for a specific patient due to the interfraction dose variation in MammoSite treatment.PACS number: 87.53.Jw
Comparison of single and multiple dwell position methods in MammoSite high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy planning
Authors: Kim Yongbok , Trombetta Mark G. , Miften Moyed 
Published: February 2017

The purpose of this study is to dosimetrically compare two plans generated using single dwell position method (SDPM) and multiple dwell position methods (MDPM) in MammoSite high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy planning for 19 breast cancer patients. In computed tomography (CT) image‐based HDR planning, a surface optimization technique was used in both methods. Following dosimetric parameters were compared for fraction 1 plans: %PTV_EVAL (planning target volume for plan evaluation) coverage, dose homogeneity index (DHI), dose conformal index (COIN), maximum dose to skin and ipsilateral lung, and breast tissue volume receiving 150% (V150[cc]) and 200% (V200[cc]) of the prescribed dose. In addition, a plan was retrospectively generated for each fraction 2–10 to simulate the clinical situation where the fraction 1 plan was used for fractions 2–10 without modification. In order to create nine derived plans for each method and for each of the 19 patients, the catheter location and contours of target and critical structures were defined on the CT images acquired prior to each fraction 2–10, while using the same dwell‐time distribution as used for fraction 1 (original plan). Interfraction dose variations were evaluated for 19 patients by comparing the derived nine plans (each for fractions 2–10) with the original plan (fraction 1) using the same dosimetric parameters used for fraction 1 plan comparison. For the fraction 1 plan comparison, the MDPM resulted in slightly increased %PTV_EVAL coverage, COIN, V150[cc] and V200[cc] values by an average of 1.2%, 0.025, 0.5 cc and 0.7 cc, respectively, while slightly decreased DHI, maximum skin and ipsilateral lung dose by an average of 0.003, 3.2 cGy and 5.8 cGy, respectively. For the interfraction dose variation comparison, the SDPM resulted in slightly smaller variations in %PTV_EVAL coverage, DHI, maximum skin dose and V150[cc] values by an average of 0.4%, 0.0005, 0.5 cGy and 0.2 cc, respectively, while slightly higher average variations in COIN, maximum ipsilateral lung dose and V200[cc] values by 0.0028, 0.2 cGy and 0.2 cc, respectively. All differences were too small to be clinically significant. Compared to the MDPM, the SDPM combined with a surface optimization technique can generate a clinically comparable fraction 1 treatment plan with a similar interfraction dose variation if a single source is carefully positioned at the center of the balloon catheter.PACS number: 87.53.Jw
A comprehensive study on decreasing the kilovoltage cone‐beam CT dose by reducing the projection number
Authors: Lu Bo , Lu Haibin , Palta Jatinder 
Published: February 2017

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of kilovoltage cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) on registration accuracy and image qualities with a reduced number of planar projections used in volumetric imaging reconstruction. The ultimate goal is to evaluate the possibility of reducing the patient dose while maintaining registration accuracy under different projection‐number schemes for various clinical sites. An Elekta Synergy Linear accelerator with an onboard CBCT system was used in this study. The quality of the Elekta XVI cone‐beam three‐dimensional volumetric images reconstructed with a decreasing number of projections was quantitatively evaluated by a Catphan phantom. Subsequently, we tested the registration accuracy of imaging data sets on three rigid anthropomorphic phantoms and three real patient sites under the reduced projection‐number (as low as 1/6th) reconstruction of CBCT data with different rectilinear shifts and rotations. CBCT scan results of the Catphan phantom indicated the CBCT images got noisier when the number of projections was reduced, but their spatial resolution and uniformity were hardly affected. The maximum registration errors under the small amount transformation of the reference CT images were found to be within 0.7 mm translation and 0.3° rotation. However, when the projection number was lower than one‐fourth of the full set with a large amount of transformation of reference CT images, the registration could easily be trapped into local minima solutions for a nonrigid anatomy. We concluded, by using projection‐number reduction strategy under conscientious care, imaging‐guided localization procedure could achieve a lower patient dose without losing the registration accuracy for various clinical sites and situations. A faster scanning time is the main advantage compared to the mA decrease‐based, dose‐reduction method.PACS numbers: 87.57.C‐, 87.57.cf, 87.57.cj, 87.57.cm, 87.57.cp, 87.57.N‐, 87.57.nf, 87.57.nj
Quality assurance methodology for Varian RapidArc treatment plans
Authors: Iftimia Ileana , Cirino Eileen T. , Xiong Li , Mower Herbert W. 
Published: February 2017

With the commercial introduction of the Varian RapidArc, a new modality for treatment planning and delivery, the need has arisen for consistent and efficient techniques for performing patient‐specific quality assurance (QA) tests. In this paper we present our methodology for a RapidArc treatment plan QA procedure. For our measurements we used a 2D diode array (MapCHECK) embedded at 5 cm water equivalent depth in MapPHAN 5 phantom and an Exradin A16 ion chamber placed in six different positions in a cylindrical homogeneous phantom (QUASAR). We also checked the MUs for the RapidArc plans by using independent software (RadCalc). The agreement between Eclipse calculations and MapCHECK/MapPHAN 5 measurements was evaluated using both absolute distance‐to‐agreement (DTA) and gamma index with 10% dose threshold (TH), 3% dose difference (DD), and 3 mm DTA. The average agreement was 94.4% for the DTA approach and 96.3% for the gamma index approach. In high‐dose areas, the discrepancy between calculations and ion chamber measurements using the QUASAR phantom was within 4.5% for prostate cases. For the RadCalc calculations, we used the average SSD along the arc; however, for some patients the agreement for the MUs obtained with RadCalc versus Eclipse was inadequate . In these cases, the plan was divided into partial arc plans so that RadCalc could perform a better estimation of the MUs. The discrepancy was further reduced to within using this approach. Regardless of the variation in prescribed dose and location of the treated areas, we obtained very good results for all patients studied in this paper.PACS number: 87.55.Qr
Impact of multileaf collimator width on intraprostatic dose painting plans for dominant intraprostatic lesion of prostate cancer
Authors: Abe Eisuke , Mizowaki Takashi , Norihisa Yoshiki , Narita Yuuichirou , Matsuo Yukinori , Narabayashi Masaru , Nagata Yasushi , Hiraoka Masahiro 
Published: February 2017

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of multileaf collimator width (MLC‐W) on intraprostatic dose painting plans for prostate cancer.Prostate cancer maps based on the histopathological findings were superimposed onto simulation CT images. Clinical target volume (CTV) 1 was defined as the prostate and the base of the seminal vesicles, and CTV2 was defined as the dominant intraprostatic lesions. Planning target volume (PTV) 1 and PTV2 were delineated by adding 5 mm margins to CTV1 and CTV2, respectively. For each case, two dose painting plans were created to deliver 74 Gy to PTV1 and 84 Gy to PTV2 with dynamic multileaf collimator technique using two different MLCs: m3 (MLC‐W: 3 mm) and Millennium (5 mm). Plans were evaluated by comparing the conformation number (CN), a quantity that defines the degree of conformality.The CNs for plans using the m3 and Millennium were 0.68 and 0.67 for PTV1 and 0.59 and 0.58 for PTV2, respectively. The CNs tended to be higher for a thinner leaf width .Dosimetric advantages associated with smaller leaves were observed. However, differences between 3 mm and 5 mm leaf width were relatively small, which suggested that 5 mm leaf width would be acceptable in dose painting plans for prostate cancer.PACS numbers: 87.56.N‐, 87.56.nk, 87.55.D‐
The effect and stability of MVCT images on adaptive TomoTherapy
Authors: Yadav Poonam , Tolakanahalli Ranjini , Rong Yi , Paliwal Bhudatt R 
Published: February 2017

Use of helical TomoTherapy‐based MVCT imaging for adaptive planning is becoming increasingly popular. Treatment planning and dose calculations based on MVCT require an image value to electron density calibration to remain stable over the course of treatment time. In this work, we have studied the dosimetric impact on TomoTherapy treatment plans due to variation in image value to density table (IVDT) curve as a function of target degradation. We also have investigated the reproducibility and stability of the TomoTherapy MVCT image quality over time. Multiple scans of the TomoTherapy “Cheese” phantom were performed over a period of five months. Over this period, a difference of 4.7% in the HU values was observed in high‐density regions while there was no significant variation in the image values for the low densities of the IVDT curve. Changes in the IVDT curves before and after target replacement were measured. Two clinical treatment sites, pelvis and prostate, were selected to study the dosimetric impact of this variation. Dose was recalculated on the MVCTs with the planned fluence using IVDT curves acquired before and after target change. For the cases studied, target replacement resulted in an overall difference of less than 5%, which can be significant for hypo‐fractionated cases. Hence, it is recommended to measure the IVDT curves on a monthly basis and after any major repairs/replacements.PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.bd, 87.57.C, 87.57.Q
Design and dosimetry characteristics of a commercial applicator system for intra‐operative electron beam therapy utilizing ELEKTA Precise accelerator
Authors: Nevelsky Alexander , Bernstein Zvi , Bar‐Deroma Raquel , Kuten Abraham , Orion Itzhak 
Published: February 2017

The design concept and dosimetric characteristics of a new applicator system for intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) are presented in this work. A new hard‐docking commercial system includes polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) applicators with different diameters and applicator end angles and a set of secondary lead collimators. A telescopic device allows changing of source‐to‐surface distance (SSD). All measurements were performed for 6, 9, 12 and 18 MeV electron energies. Output factors and percentage depth doses (PDD) were measured in a water phantom using a plane‐parallel ion chamber. Isodose contours and radiation leakage were measured using a solid water phantom and radiographic films. The dependence of PDD on SSD was checked for the applicators with the smallest and the biggest diameters. SSD dependence of the output factors was measured. Hardcopies of PDD and isodose contours were prepared to help the team during the procedure on deciding applicator size and energy to be chosen. Applicator output factors are a function of energy, applicator size and applicator type. Dependence of SSD correction factors on applicator size and applicator type was found to be weak. The same SSD correction will be applied for all applicators in use for each energy. The radiation leakage through the applicators is clinically acceptable. The applicator system enables effective collimation of electron beams for IORT. The data presented are sufficient for applicator, energy and monitor unit selection for IORT treatment of a patient.PACS number: 87.00.00, 29.20.‐c
Portal dosimetry for pretreatment verification of IMRT plan: a comparison with 2D ion chamber array
Authors: Sharma Dayananda Shamurailatpam , Mhatre Vaibav , Heigrujam Malhotra , Talapatra Kaustav , Mallik Suman 
Published: February 2017

Portal dosimetry (PD) was performed for 181 fields from 14 IMRT plans of various clinical sites at gantry zero and source‐to‐detector distance (SDD) of 100 cm. PD was realized using aSi1000 electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and portal dose prediction (PDP) algorithm implemented in Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). Agreement of PDP predicted and EPID measured photon fluence/dose distribution were evaluated using gamma (γ) index set at 3% at 3 mm distance to point agreement (DTA). Three gamma scaling parameters, maximum , average and percentage of points with were estimated for each field. An independent measurement was carried out using MatriXX 2D ion chamber array with detector plane at 100 cm and and were estimated using OmniPro IMRT analyzing software. Effect of extended SDD and gantry rotation on portal dosimetry outcome was also investigated for another 45 IMRT fields. PDP predicted and EPID measured photon fluence agrees well with overall mean values of and 1 at 2.02, 0.24 and 99.43%, respectively. value was lower in 15 MV compared to 6 MV IMRT plan. Independent verification using MatriXX showed comparable overall mean values of and at 0.25 and 99.80%. However, in all plans, MatriXX showed significantly lower with an overall mean value of 1.35. In portal dosimetry, compared to gamma values at 100 cm SDD, and values improve from a mean of 0.16, 0.03 and 0.26 at 110 cm SDD to 0.35, 0.05 and 0.29 at 140 cm SDD. PD outcome was independent of gantry rotation. In conclusion, both MatriXX 2D ion chamber array and portal dosimetry showed comparable results and can be use as an alternative to each other for relative photon fluence verification.PACS number (s): 87.55.D‐, 87.55.de, 87.55.kd,87.55.km,87.55.Qr,87.56Fc:
Use of a matchline dosimetry analysis tool (MDAT) to quantify dose homogeneity in the region between abutting tangential and supraclavicular radiation fields
Authors: Homann Kenneth L. , Gates B. Earl , Salehpour Mohammad , Followill David S. , Kirsner Steven M. , White R. Allen , Buchholz Thomas A. , Prado Karl L. 
Published: February 2017

In this work, we develop and test a matchline dosimetry analysis tool (MDAT) to examine the dose distribution within the abutment region of two or more adjoining radiotherapy fields that employ different blocking mechanisms and geometries in forming a match. This objective and quantitative tool uses calibrated radiographic film to measure the dose in the abutment region, and uses a frequency distribution of area versus dose (a dose‐area histogram) to visualize the spatial dose distribution. We tested the MDAT's clinical applicability and parameters by evaluating the dose between adjacent photon fields incident on a flat phantom using field‐matching techniques employing collimator‐jaw and multileaf collimator (MLC) configurations. Additionally, we evaluated the dose in the abutment regions of four different clinical tangential‐breast and supraclavicular matching techniques using various combinations of collimator and MLC matches. Using the MDAT tool, it was determined that a 1 cm abutment region width (centered about the theoretical matchline between fields) is the most appropriate width to determine dose homogeneity in a field matching region. Using the MDAT, both subtle and large differences were seen between fields that used MLCs to form the match, compared to flat edge devices such as collimators and external cerrobend blocks. We conclude that the MDAT facilitates a more precise evaluation of the distribution of dose within the region of abutment of radiotherapy fields.PACS number: 87.55.dk
Improved volumetric imaging in tomosynthesis using combined multiaxial sweeps
Authors: Gersh Jacob A. , Wiant David B. , Best Ryan C.M. , Bennett Marcus C. , Munley Michael T. , King June D. , McKee Mahta M. , Baydush Alan H. 
Published: February 2017

This study explores the volumetric reconstruction fidelity attainable using tomosynthesis with a kV imaging system which has a unique ability to rotate isocentrically and with multiple degrees of mechanical freedom. More specifically, we seek to investigate volumetric reconstructions by combining multiple limited‐angle rotational image acquisition sweeps. By comparing these reconstructed images with those of a CBCT reconstruction, we can gauge the volumetric fidelity of the reconstructions. In surgical situations, the described tomosynthesis‐based system could provide high‐quality volumetric imaging without requiring patient motion, even with rotational limitations present. Projections were acquired using the Digital Integrated Brachytherapy Unit, or IBU‐D. A phantom was used which contained several spherical objects of varying contrast. Using image projections acquired during isocentric sweeps around the phantom, reconstructions were performed by filtered backprojection. For each image acquisition sweep configuration, a contrasting sphere is analyzed using two metrics and compared to a gold standard CBCT reconstruction. Since the intersection of a reconstructed sphere and an imaging plane is ideally a circle with an eccentricity of zero, the first metric presented compares the effective eccentricity of intersections of reconstructed volumes and imaging planes. As another metric of volumetric reconstruction fidelity, the volume of one of the contrasting spheres was determined using manual contouring. By comparing these manually delineated volumes with a CBCT reconstruction, we can gauge the volumetric fidelity of reconstructions. The configuration which yielded the highest overall volumetric reconstruction fidelity, as determined by effective eccentricities and volumetric contouring, consisted of two orthogonally‐offset 60° L‐arm sweeps and a single C‐arm sweep which shared a pivot point with one the L‐arm sweeps. When compared to a similar configuration that lacked the C‐arm component, it is shown that the C‐arm improves the delineation of volumes along the transverse axis. The results described herein suggest that volumetric reconstruction using multiple, unconstrained orthogonal sweeps can provide an improvement compared with traditional cone beam CT using standard axial rotations.PACS number: 87.57.nf