bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Detection of Chromosome Abnormalities Pre–High-Dose Treatment in Patients Developing Therapy-Related Myelodysplasia and Secondary Acute Myelogenous Leukemia After Treatment for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Authors: Lillington Debra M. , Micallef Ivana N.M. , Carpenter Emily , Neat Michael J. , Amess John A.L. , Matthews Janet , Foot Nicola J. , Young Bryan D. , Lister T. Andrew , Rohatiner Ama Z.S. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To assess whether pre–high-dose therapy (HDT)–related factors play a critical role in the development of therapy-related myelodysplasia (tMDS) or secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine of 230 patients with a primary diagnosis of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) developed tMDS/sAML after HDT comprising cyclophosphamide and total-body irradiation (TBI) supported by autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells. G-banding and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) were used to detect clonal cytogenetic abnormalities. RESULTS: The majority of patients showed complex karyotypes at diagnosis of tMDS/sAML containing, in particular, complete or partial loss of chromosomes 5 and/or 7. Using single locus–specific FISH probes, significant levels of clonally abnormal cells were found before HDT in 20 of 20 tMDS/sAML patients screened, compared with three of 24 patients screened who currently have not developed tMDS/sAML, at a median follow-up of 5.9 years after HDT. CONCLUSION: Prior cytotoxic therapy may play an important etiologic role and may predispose to the development of tMDS/sAML. Using a triple FISH assay designed to detect loss of chromosomal material from 5q31, 7q22, or 13q14, significant levels of abnormal cells can be detected before HDT and may predict which patients are at increased risk of developing secondary disease. Further prospective evaluation of this FISH assay is warranted to determine its predictive power in this setting.
Phase II Study of Docetaxel, Estramustine, and Low-Dose Hydrocortisone in Men With Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer: A Final Report of CALGB 9780
Authors: Savarese D.M. , Halabi S. , Hars V. , Akerley W.L. , Taplin M-E , Godley P.A. , Hussain A. , Small E.J. , Vogelzang N.J. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To investigate the combination of docetaxel, estramustine (EM), and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Combinations of EM with other antimitotic agents such as docetaxel are synergistic in vitro and show significant clinical activity in patients with HRPC. We studied intravenous administration of docetaxel 70 mg/m2, oral estramustine, and low-dose daily hydrocortisone in men with HRPC who demonstrated progression after initial hormone therapy. RESULTS: Of the 47 men enrolled onto this multicenter cooperative group study, 46 were assessable for response and/or toxicity. In the 24 patients with measurable disease, there were three complete and nine partial responses for a measurable disease response rate of 50% (12 of 24 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27% to 73%). In the 44 patients in whom pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was elevated, 30 (68%) had a 50% or greater decrease, and 25 (57%) had a 75% or greater decrease in PSA. The combined measurable disease and biochemical response rate in all 46 assessable patients was 54% (three complete responses, 22 partial responses, 95% CI, 37% to 71%). The predominant toxicity was neutropenia, with 26% of patients having grade 3 and 30% having grade 4 granulocytopenia; there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Other common but mild adverse effects included malaise/fatigue, peripheral edema, and hyperglycemia. The incidence of thromboembolic events during therapy was 9%. With a median follow-up of 17 months, the median survival was 20 months. The median time to disease progression was 8 months for all patients, and 10 months for those with measurable disease. CONCLUSION: This therapy is efficacious and moderately well tolerated in HRPC and should be compared in a phase III trial with mitoxantrone and prednisone.
Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor COL-3 in the Treatment of AIDS-Related Kaposi’s Sarcoma: A Phase I AIDS Malignancy Consortium Study
Authors: Cianfrocca Mary , Cooley Timothy P. , Lee Jeannette Y. , Rudek Michelle A. , Scadden David T. , Ratner Lee , Pluda James M. , Figg William D. , Krown Susan E. , Dezube Bruce J. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are involved in tumor invasion and metastasis and are overexpressed in Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) cells. The primary aim was to define the safety and toxicity of the MMP inhibitor COL-3 in patients with AIDS-related KS. Secondary aims were to evaluate tumor response, pharmacokinetics, and changes in blood levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF).PATIENTS AND METHODS: COL-3 was administered orally once daily, and doses were escalated in cohorts of three to six subjects. Patients with symptomatic visceral KS or severe tumor-associated edema were excluded. Antiretroviral therapy was permitted but not required. Study end points were grade 3 or 4 toxicity or progressive KS. Serial blood specimens were obtained for pharmacokinetics and levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, VEGF, and bFGF.RESULTS: Eighteen patients received COL-3 in dosing cohorts of 25, 50, and 70 mg/m2/d. Prior KS therapy was reported by 17 patients (94%). COL-3–related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported by six patients and included photosensitivity, rash, and headache. There was one complete response and seven partial responses, for an overall response rate of 44%, with a median response duration of 25+ weeks. The median COL-3 half-life was 39.3 hours (range, 4.1 to 251.1 hours). There was a significant difference between responders and nonresponders with respect to the change in MMP-2 serum levels from baseline to minimum value on treatment (P = .037).CONCLUSION: COL-3 administered orally once daily to patients with AIDS-related KS is reasonably well tolerated. The most common adverse event was dose-related photosensitivity. Antitumor activity was noted. Further evaluation of COL-3 for the treatment of KS is warranted.
Patients’ Estimation of Overall Treatment Burden: Why Not Ask the Obvious?
Authors: Bernhard J. , Maibach R. , Thürlimann B. , Sessa C. , Aapro M. S. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: We investigated the clinical validity of patients’ estimation of overall treatment burden. This measure was expected to be responsive to the wide spectrum of reactions on treatment and thus less precise for specific effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After the first chemotherapy within a randomized, double-blind trial of the prophylaxis for delayed emesis (SAKK 90/95), 249 patients documented nausea and vomiting daily for 6 days. Over the whole period, they estimated nausea/vomiting (N/V) burden and overall treatment burden by linear analog-self assessment (LASA) indicators and documented other side effects. RESULTS: At day 6, the two burden indicators were moderately correlated (r = 0.58) in accordance with their different concepts. No, partial, or total control of delayed emesis (days 2 to 6) was reflected in a consistent pattern by both indicators, with a stronger and more significant effect (P < .001) on changes in N/V burden than overall treatment burden. In contrast, toxicity other than N/V, assessed independently by patients and physicians, was mainly associated with overall treatment burden. Patients who indicated at least one other side effect rated their overall burden substantially higher than those with no indication of other toxicity (P < .0001). Physician-rated toxicity had a similar effect (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: A direct patient estimation of overall treatment burden by a LASA indicator may serve as an end point in clinical trials, particularly when treatments with different toxicity profiles are being compared. It is complementary to physicians’ ratings of specific toxicities and a major component of patient-rated symptom checklists and quality-of-life measures.
Prospective Study of 90 Children Requiring Treatment for Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Report From the Children’s Cancer Group
Authors: Woods William G. , Barnard Dorothy R. , Alonzo Todd A. , Buckley Jonathan D. , Kobrinsky Nathan , Arthur Diane C. , Sanders Jean , Neudorf Steven , Gold Stuart , Lange Beverly J. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: We report the first large prospective study of children with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) treated in a uniform fashion on Children’s Cancer Group protocol 2891. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety children with JMML, various forms of MDS, or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with antecedent MDS were treated with a five-drug induction regimen (standard or intensive timing). Patients achieving remission were allocated to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) if a matched family donor was available. All other patients were randomized between autologous BMT and aggressive nonmyeloablative chemotherapy. Results were compared with patients with de novo AML. RESULTS: Patients with JMML and refractory anemia (RA) or RA-excess blasts (RAEB) exhibited high induction failure rates and overall remission of 58% and 48%, respectively. Remission rates for patients with RAEB in transformation (RAEB-T) (69%) or antecedent MDS (81%) were similar to de novo AML (77%). Actuarial survival rates at 6 years were as follows: JMML, 31% ± 26%; RA and RAEB, 29% ± 16%; RAEB-T, 30% ± 18%; antecedent MDS, 50% ± 25%; and de novo AML, 45% ± 3%. For patients achieving remission, long-term survivors were found in those receiving either allogeneic BMT or chemotherapy. The presence of monosomy 7 had no additional adverse effect on MDS and JMML. CONCLUSION: Childhood subtypes of MDS and JMML represent distinct entities with distinct clinical outcomes. Children with a history of MDS who present with AML do well with AML-type therapy. Patients with RA or RAEB respond poorly to AML induction therapy. The optimum treatment for JMML remains unknown.
Can Communication Skills Training Alter Physicians’ Beliefs and Behavior in Clinics?
Authors: Jenkins Valerie , Fallowfield Lesley 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To measure the psychosocial attitudes and beliefs of physicians working within oncology in the United Kingdom and to examine whether beliefs alter after communication skills training. Additionally, to investigate whether physicians’ attitudes are reflected in communication behaviors with patients during interviews. METHODS: Ninety-three physicians completed a 32-item Physician Psychosocial Belief (PPSB) questionnaire at baseline (T1) before randomization to attendance at a 3-day residential communication skills course (n = 48) or a control group (n = 45). Three months later (T2), both groups completed another PPSB and a self-assessment questionnaire recording perceived changes in communication with patients. At both time points, physicians’ consultations with two consenting patients were videotaped. Communication behaviors were measured using the Medical Interaction Processing System. RESULTS: Physicians who attended the course showed significantly improved attitudes and beliefs toward psychosocial issues compared with controls (P = .002). This improvement was reflected in the analysis of the videotaped recordings of their communication behaviors with patients. Expressions of empathy were more likely for the course group at T2 than the controls (P = .02), as were open questions (P = .001), appropriate responses to patient cues (P = .005), and psychosocial probing (P = .041). These objective findings were supported by physicians’ self report of changes in communication style during interviews with patients. CONCLUSION: Our results show that a communication skills training intervention using behavioral, cognitive, and affective components not only increases potentially beneficial and more effective interviewing styles but can also alter attitudes and beliefs, thus increasing the likelihood that such skills will be used in the clinical setting.
Phase I Trial of Intraperitoneal Injection of the E1B-55-kd-Gene–Deleted Adenovirus ONYX-015 (dl1520) Given on Days 1 Through 5 Every 3 Weeks in Patients With Recurrent/Refractory Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Authors: Vasey P. A. , Shulman L. N. , Campos S. , Davis J. , Gore M. , Johnston S. , Kirn D. H. , O’Neill V. , Siddiqui N. , Seiden M. V. , Kaye S. B. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Resistance to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer is frequently associated with mutations in the p53 gene. The adenovirus dl1520 (ONYX-015) with the E1B 55-kd gene deleted, allowing selective replication in and lysis of p53-deficient tumor cells, has shown preclinical efficacy against p53-deficient nude mouse-human ovarian carcinomatosis xenografts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We undertook a phase I trial of intraperitoneal dl1520 in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Sixteen women with recurrent/refractory ovarian cancer received 35 cycles (median, two cycles) of dl1520 delivered on days 1 through 5 in four dose cohorts: 1 × 109 plaque forming units (pfu), 1 × 1010 pfu, 3 × 1010 pfu, and 1 × 1011 pfu. RESULTS: The most common significant toxicities related to virus administration were flu-like symptoms, emesis, and abdominal pain. One patient receiving 1 × 1010 pfu developed common toxicity criteria grade 3 abdominal pain and diarrhea, which was dose-limiting. The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached at 1011 pfu, and at this dose level patients did not experience significant toxicity. There was no clear-cut evidence of clinical or radiologic response in any patient. Blood samples were taken for adenovirus DNA and neutralizing antibodies. Polymerase chain reaction data indicating presence of virus up to 10 days after the final (day 5) infusion of dl1520 are suggestive of continuing viral replication. CONCLUSION: This article therefore describes the first clinical experience with the intraperitoneal delivery of any replication-competent/-selective virus in cancer patients.
Primary results from EMILIA, a phase III study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus capecitabine (X) and lapatinib (L) in HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with trastuzumab (T) and a taxane.
Authors: Blackwell Kimberly L. , Miles David , Gianni Luca , Krop Ian E. , Welslau Manfred , Baselga José , Pegram Mark D. , Oh Do-Youn , Dieras Veronique , Olsen Steven R. , Fang Liang , Lu Michael W. , Guardino Ellie , Verma Sunil 
Published: February 2017

LBA1 Background: T-DM1 is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising T, a stable linker, and the potent cytotoxic agent DM1; it incorporates the antitumor activities of T and the HER2-targeted delivery of DM1. Methods: EMILIA is a randomized study of T-DM1 vs XL, the only approved combination for T-refractory HER2+ MBC. Patients (pts) received T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg IV q3w) or X (1000 mg/m2 PO bid, days 1–14 q3w) + L (1,250 mg PO daily) until progressive disease (PD) or unmanageable toxicity. Pts had confirmed HER2+ MBC (IHC3+ and/or FISH+), and prior therapy with T and a taxane. Primary end points were PFS by independent review, OS and safety. An interim OS analysis (efficacy boundary: HR= 0.617; p=0.0003) was planned at the time of the final PFS analysis. Results: 991 pts were enrolled; 978 received treatment. Median (med) durations of follow-up were 12.9 (T-DM1) and 12.4 (XL) months (mo). Baseline demographics, prior therapy and disease characteristics were balanced. There was a significant improvement in PFS favoring T-DM1 (med 9.6 vs 6.4 mo; HR=0.650 [95% CI, 0.549–0.771]; p <0.0001). The med T-DM1 OS was not reached vs 23.3 mo (HR=0.621 [95% CI, 0.475–0.813]; p=0.0005); the interim efficacy boundary was not crossed. T-DM1 was well tolerated with no unexpected safety signals. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) per treatment were for T-DM1: thrombocytopenia (12.9% vs 0.2%), increased AST (4.3% vs 0.8%), and increased ALT (2.9% vs 1.4%); for XL: diarrhea (20.7% vs 1.6%), palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (16.4% vs 0) and vomiting (4.5% vs 0.8%). The table lists other end points. Conclusions: T-DM1 conferred a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS compared with XL. Other end points support T-DM1 as an active and well-tolerated novel therapy for HER2+ advanced BC. [Table: see text]
Randomized phase III trial of regorafenib in patients (pts) with metastatic and/or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) progressing despite prior treatment with at least imatinib (IM) and sunitinib (SU): GRID trial.
Authors: Demetri George D. , Reichardt Peter , Kang Yoon-Koo , Blay Jean-Yves , Joensuu Heikki , Maki Robert G. , Rutkowski Piotr , Hohenberger Peter , Gelderblom Hans , Leahy Michael Gordon , von Mehren Margaret , Schoffski Patrick , Blackstein Martin E. , Le Cesne Axel , Badalamenti Giuseppe , Xu Jian-Ming , Nishida Toshirou , Laurent Dirk , Kuss Iris , Casali Paolo Giovanni ,   on behalf of GRID Investigators
Published: February 2017

LBA10008 Background: Oral multikinase inhibitor regorafenib (REG) demonstrated substantial activity in a phase II trial in pts with GIST after failure of both IM and SU (J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:606s; abstr 10007). This phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of REG for this unmet clinical need. Methods: Eligible pts had metastatic and/or unresectable GIST, objective failure of both prior IM and SU (progressive disease [PD] on, or intolerance to, IM and PD on SU), ≥1 measurable lesion, ECOG performance status 0 or 1. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive best supportive care plus either REG 160 mg po once daily (3 wks on/1 wk off) or placebo (PL). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) (modified RECIST 1.1, independent central review). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR, defined as rate of partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD] lasting for ≥12 wks), response rate and duration, safety and correlative genotype analyses. At time of PD, pts were eligible for unblinding and crossover to open-label REG. Results: Between Jan and Aug of 2011, 234 pts were screened; 199 were randomized (REG: 133, PL: 66). Pts were stratified at randomization according to number of prior systemic therapies and geographical region. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two arms. The primary endpoint was met: median PFS was 4.8 months for REG vs. 0.9 months for PL. Hazard ratio for PFS was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.18-0.39), p<0.0001. PFS rates at 3 and 6 months were 60% and 38% for REG vs. 11% and 0% for PL. DCR was 53% (REG) vs. 9% (PL).The HR for OS was 0.77 (p=0.20) with 85% PL pts having crossed over to REG. The most common > grade 3 treatment-emergent AEs in the REG arm during double-blind study were hypertension (28%), hand-foot skin reaction (21%), and diarrhea (8%). Conclusions: This randomized trial demonstrated that REG significantly improved PFS and DCR in pts with advanced GIST after failure of at least prior IM and SU. REG was well tolerated, with AEs as expected for this class and manageable with dose modifications.
Open-label phase III randomized controlled trial comparing taxane-based chemotherapy (Tax) with lapatinib (L) or trastuzumab (T) as first-line therapy for women with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer: Interim analysis (IA) of NCIC CTG MA.31/GSK EGF 108919.
Authors: Gelmon Karen A. , Boyle Frances , Kaufman Bella , Huntsman David , Manikhas Alexey , Di Leo Angelo , Martin Miguel , Schwartzberg Lee Steven , Dent Susan Faye , Ellard Susan , Tonkin Katia Sonia , Nagarwala Yasir M. , Pritchard Kathleen I. , Whelan Timothy Joseph , Nomikos Dora , Chapman Judy-Anne W. , Parulekar Wendy 
Published: February 2017

LBA671 Background: The relative efficacy of L vs T when combined with Tax chemotherapy in the first-line setting of metastatic breast cancer (BC) is unknown. Methods: MA.31 compares Tax-based therapy, paclitaxel 80mg/m2 wkly or docetaxel 75mg/m2 3 wkly for 24 wks in combination with L or T. The L dose was 1,250 mg po daily with Tax followed by 1,500 mg daily (LTax/L). After a loading dose, the T dose was 2 mg/kg wkly or 6 mg/kg 3 wkly + Tax followed by T 6 mg/kg 3 wkly (TTax/T). Stratification was by prior neo/adjuvant HER2 therapy, prior neo/adjuvant Tax, planned Tax (paclitaxel vs docetaxel), and liver metastases. The primary endpoint is ITT progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from randomization to objective progressive disease based on RECIST criteria or death from any cause. The protocol-specified IA was performed after observing 333 PFS events; the trial was to stop if the 2-sided p-value from the stratified log-rank test was less than 0.03. The NCIC CTG’s independent DSMC reviewed IA results and recommended disclosure because the superiority boundary was crossed. A secondary analysis utilized central laboratory-confirmed HER2 + status. Results: Between July 17 2008 and Dec 1 2011, 652 pts were accrued. Data from 636 pts (525 HER2 centrally confirmed) were included in the IA with clinical cutoff date of Nov 7 2011 and database lock of Apr 13 2012. Median follow-up was 13.6 mos, 12.9 mos for LTax/L pts and 14.0 mos for TTax/T patients. In the ITT analysis, PFS was inferior with LTax/L compared to TTax/T hazard ratio (HR) =1.33; 95% CI 1.06-1.67; p=0.01. LTax/L had median PFS 8.8 mos (95% CI 8.3-10.6) compared to TTax/T 11.4 mos (95% CI 10.8-13.7). PFS in the centrally confirmed HER2+ had HR 1.48 (95%CI 1.15-1.92; p=0.003) (LTax/L to TTax/T). No difference in overall survival was detected (LTax/L to TTax/T) HR= 1.1 (95% CI 0.75-1.61; p=0.62). More grade 3-4 diarrhea and rash was observed with LTax/L (p<0.001). Conclusions: LTax/L therapy is associated with a shorter PFS compared to TTax/T as first line therapy for HER2+ metastatic BC. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00667251. CCSRI grant: 021039. Supported by GlaxoSmithKline.