bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A critical evaluation of the PTW 2D‐ARRAY seven29 and OCTAVIUS II phantom for IMRT and VMAT verification
Authors: Hussein Mohammad , Adams Elizabeth J. , Jordan Thomas J. , Clark Catharine H. , Nisbet Andrew 
Published: February 2017

Quality assurance (QA) for intensity‐ and volumetric‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT and VMAT) has evolved substantially. In recent years, various commercial 2D and 3D ionization chamber or diode detector arrays have become available, allowing for absolute verification with near real time results, allowing for streamlined QA. However, detector arrays are limited by their resolution, giving rise to concerns about their sensitivity to errors. Understanding the limitations of these devices is therefore critical. In this study, the sensitivity and resolution of the PTW 2D‐ARRAY seven29 and OCTAVIUS II phantom combination was comprehensively characterized for use in dynamic sliding window IMRT and RapidArc verification. Measurement comparisons were made between single acquisition and a multiple merged acquisition techniques to improve the effective resolution of the 2D‐ARRAY, as well as comparisons against GAFCHROMIC EBT2 film and electronic portal imaging dosimetry (EPID). The sensitivity and resolution of the 2D‐ARRAY was tested using two gantry angle 0° modulated test fields. Deliberate multileaf collimator (MLC) errors of 1, 2, and 5 mm and collimator rotation errors were inserted into IMRT and RapidArc plans for pelvis and head & neck sites, to test sensitivity to errors. The radiobiological impact of these errors was assessed to determine the gamma index passing criteria to be used with the 2D‐ARRAY to detect clinically relevant errors. For gamma index distributions, it was found that the 2D‐ARRAY in single acquisition mode was comparable to multiple acquisition modes, as well as film and EPID. It was found that the commonly used gamma index criteria of 3% dose difference or 3 mm distance to agreement may potentially mask clinically relevant errors. Gamma index criteria of 3%/2 mm with a passing threshold of 98%, or 2%/2 mm with a passing threshold of 95%, were found to be more sensitive. We suggest that the gamma index passing thresholds may be used for guidance, but also should be combined with a visual inspection of the gamma index distribution and calculation of the dose difference to assess whether there may be a clinical impact in failed regions.PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc
Assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio‐visual coaching through successive 4D CT sessions
Authors: Goossens Samuel , Senny Frédéric , Lee John Aldo , Janssens Guillaume , Geets Xavier 
Published: February 2017

This study aimed to compare combined audio‐visual coaching with audio coaching alone and assess their respective impact on the reproducibility of external breathing motion and, one step further, on the internal lung tumor motion itself, through successive sessions. Thirteen patients with NSCLC were enrolled in this study. The tumor motion was assessed by three to four successive 4D CT sessions, while the breathing signal was measured from magnetic sensors positioned on the epigastric region. For all sessions, the breathing was regularized with either audio coaching alone (AC, ) or combined with a real‐time visual feedback (A/VC, ) when tolerated by the patients. Peak‐to‐peak amplitude, period and signal shape of both breathing and tumor motions were first measured. Then, the correlation between the respiratory signal and internal tumor motion over time was evaluated, as well as the residual tumor motion for a gated strategy. Although breathing and tumor motions were comparable between AC and AV/C groups, A/VC approach achieved better reproducibility through sessions than AC alone (mean tumor motion of vs. , and mean breathing motion of vs. , respectively). High internal/external correlation reproducibility was achieved in the superior‐inferior tumor motion direction for all patients. For the anterior‐posterior tumor motion direction, better correlation reproducibility has been observed when visual feedback has been used. For a displacement‐based gating approach, A/VC might also be recommended, since it led to smaller residual tumor motion within clinically relevant duty cycles. This study suggests that combining real‐time visual feedback with audio coaching might improve the reproducibility of key characteristics of the breathing pattern, and might thus be considered in the implementation of lung tumor radiotherapy.PACS number: 87
Evaluation of Acuros XB algorithm based on RTOG 0813 dosimetric criteria for SBRT lung treatment with RapidArc
Authors: Rana Suresh , Rogers Kevin , Pokharel Shyam , Cheng ChihYao 
Published: February 2017

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0813 protocol requires the use of dose calculation algorithms with tissue heterogeneity corrections to compute dose on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) plans. A new photon dose calculation algorithm called Acuros XB (AXB) has recently been implemented in the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). The main purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric results of AXB with that of anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) for RTOG 0813 parameters. Additionally, phantom study was done to evaluate the dose prediction accuracy of AXB and AAA beyond low‐density medium of different thicknesses by comparing the calculated results with the measurements. For the RTOG dosimetric study, 14 clinically approved SBRT NSCLC cases were included. The planning target volume (PTV) ranged from 3.2‐43.0 cc. RapidArc treatment plans were generated in the Eclipse TPS following RTOG 0813 dosimetric criteria, and treatment plans were calculated using AAA with heterogeneity correction (AAA plans). All the AAA plans were then recalculated using AXB with heterogeneity correction (AXB plans) for identical beam parameters and same number of monitor units. The AAA and AXB plans were compared for following RTOG 0813 parameters: ratio of prescription isodose volume to PTV (R100%), ratio of 50% prescription isodose volume to PTV (R50%), maximal dose 2 cm from the PTV in any direction as a percentage of prescription dose , and the percentage of ipsilateral lung receiving dose equal to or larger than 20 Gy . The phantom study showed that the results of AXB had better agreement with the measurements, and the difference ranged from to 2.8%. The AAA results showed larger disagreement with the measurements, with differences from 4.1% to 12.5% for field size and from 1.4% to 6.8% for field size . The results from the RTOG SBRT lung cases showed that, on average, the AXB plans produced lower values for R100%, R50%, and by 4.96%, 1.15%, and 1.60%, respectively, but higher of ipsilateral lung by 1.09% when compared with AAA plans. In the set of AAA plans, minor deviation was seen for R100% (six cases), R50% (nine cases), (four cases), and (one case). Similarly, the AXB plans also showed minor deviation for R100% (one case), R50% (eight cases), (three cases), and (one case). The dosimetric results presented in the current study show that both the AXB and AAA can meet the RTOG 0813 dosimetric criteria.PACS number: 87.55.D‐, 87.55.dk, 87.55.kd, 87.55.km
A novel approach for superficial intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) using a 50 kV X‐ray source: a technical and case report
Authors: Schneider Frank , Clausen Sven , Thölking Johannes , Wenz Frederik , Abo‐Madyan Yasser 
Published: February 2017

The use of IORT as a treatment modality for patients with close or positive margins has increased over the past decade. For situations where a flat area (up to 6 cm in diameter) has to be treated intraoperatively, new applicators for superficial treatment with a miniature X‐ray source (INTRABEAM system) were developed. Here we report our evaluation of the dosimetric characteristics of these new applicators and their first clinical use. Each of these flat and surface applicators consists of a radiation protective metal tube and a flattening filter, which converts the spherical dose distribution of the X‐ray source into a flat one. The homogeneity of each dose distribution and depth‐dose measurements were evaluated using film dosimetry in a solid water phantom and a soft X‐ray ionization chamber in a water tank. The first patient was treated with 5 Gy delivered in 5 mm using a 4 cm FLAT applicator over 21 minutes. The flat applicators show the maximum homogeneity, with a uniformity ratio of 1.02‐1.08 in certain depths. In 1 mm depth surface applicators show a uniformity ratio of 1.15‐1.28. They also show a higher dose rate and a steeper dose gradient compared to the flat applicators. The results of this investigation demonstrated that the flat and surface applicators have unique dosimetric characteristics that need to be considered during the treatment planning stages. This work also showed that it is possible to perform a superficial localized IORT which provides new application possibilities for use of the INTRABEAM system.PACS number: 87.55.ne
Measurement and Monte Carlo simulation for energy‐ and intensity‐modulated electron radiotherapy delivered by a computer‐controlled electron multileaf collimator
Authors: Jin Lihui , Eldib Ahmed , Li Jinsheng , Emam Ismail , Fan Jiajin , Wang Lu , Ma C‐M 
Published: February 2017

The dosimetric advantage of modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) has been explored by many investigators and is considered to be an advanced radiation therapy technique in the utilization of electrons. A computer‐controlled electron multileaf collimator (MLC) prototype, newly designed to be added onto a Varian linac to deliver MERT, was investigated both experimentally and by Monte Carlo simulations. Four different electron energies, 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV, were employed for this investigation. To ensure that this device was capable of delivering the electron beams properly, measurements were performed to examine the electron MLC (eMLC) leaf leakage and to determine the appropriate jaw positioning for an eMLC‐shaped field in order to eliminate a secondary radiation peak that could otherwise appear outside of an intended radiation field in the case of inappropriate jaw positioning due to insufficient radiation blockage from the jaws. Phase space data were obtained by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and recorded at the plane just above the jaws for each of the energies (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV). As an input source, phase space data were used in MC dose calculations for various sizes of the eMLC shaped field (, , and ) with respect to a water phantom at source‐to‐surface distance , while the jaws, eMLC leaves, and some accessories associated with the eMLC assembly as well were modeled as modifiers in the calculations. The calculated results were then compared with measurements from a water scanning system. The results showed that jaw settings with 5 mm margins beyond the field shaped by the eMLC were appropriate to eliminate the secondary radiation peak while not widening the beam penumbra; the eMLC leaf leakage measurements ranged from 0.3% to 1.8% for different energies based on in‐phantom measurements, which should be quite acceptable for MERT. Comparisons between MC dose calculations and measurements showed agreement within based on percentage depth doses (PDDs) and off‐axis dose profiles for a range of field sizes for each of the electron energies. Our current work has demonstrated that the eMLC and other relevant components in the linac were correctly modeled and simulated via our in‐house MC codes, and the eMLC is capable of accurately delivering electron beams for various eMLC‐shaped field sizes with appropriate jaw settings. In the next stage, patient‐specific verification with a full MERT plan should be performed.PACS number: 87.55.ne
AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 2.a: Commissioning and quality assurance of X‐ray‐based image‐guided radiotherapy systems
Authors: Fontenot Jonas D. , Alkhatib Hassaan , Garrett Jeffrey A. , Jensen Andrew R , McCullough Steven P. , Olch Arthur J. , Parker Brent C. , Yang Ching‐Chong Jack , Fairobent Lynne A. 
Published: February 2017

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science, education, and professional practice of medical physics. The AAPM has more than 8,000 members and is the principal organization of medical physicists in the United States.The AAPM will periodically define new practice guidelines for medical physics practice to help advance the science of medical physics and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing medical physics practice guidelines will be reviewed for the purpose of revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner.Each medical physics practice guideline represents a policy statement by the AAPM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, and requires the approval of the Professional Council. The medical physics practice guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guidelines and technical standards by those entities not providing these services is not authorized.
Quality assurance measurements for high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy without film
Authors: Jursinic Paul A. 
Published: February 2017

The purpose of this study was to develop new and modified tools that allow HDR brachytherapy quality assurance tests to be carried out efficiently without film, video cameras, stopwatches, and mechanical rulers; and to devise methods that use these new tools for daily and quarterly check procedures, which are efficient and provide increased accuracy compared to previous methods. The HDR brachytherapy system tested was the GammaMedplus iX, Ir‐192 HDR. Various catheters and treatment applicators designed for this system were tested. To measure the absolute position of the source, a simple tool was built that uses a Plexiglas frame, a template for applicator positioning, and a diode for radiation detection. For daily reproducibility and source strength tests, modifications were made of a Model 70008, HDR brachytherapy Ir‐192 quality assurance tool, which is used with the HDR‐1000‐Plus well‐type reentrant chamber. Measurement procedures and analysis protocols were developed that use the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet program. Independent determination of source positions was made with a computer video camera and radiochromic film. Using the new tool, for a straight catheter the measured source position is found to be within of the mechanically set distance, for a ring applicator , for a tandem , and for an ovoid . Using the modified insert, daily dwell position can be determined with an accuracy of 0.3 mm and timer accuracy can be determined with an accuracy of 0.3% over a 20 s time frame. The time needed to carry out quarterly tests is estimated to be reduced by two‐to four‐fold compared to previous methods. New and modified equipment and procedures have been developed for measuring HDR brachytherapy dwell position and dwell times efficiently with high accuracy. The equipment described in this work can be built and modifications can be made in most clinics. Location of dwell position can be determined in straight catheters and ring and ovoid applicators. Timer linearity and accuracy can be determined. Source strength can be confirmed. Measurement efficiency is improved compared to previous methods that used film, video cameras, mechanical rulers, and stopwatches.PACS number: 87.56.Fc
Local reference dose evaluation in conventional radiography examinations in Iran
Authors: Shandiz M. Shirin , Toossi M.T. Bahreyni , Farsi S. , Yaghobi K. 
Published: February 2017

The goal of this study was to establish local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for conventional radiography examinations in Sistan‐Baluchestan province of Iran, using dose area product (DAP) measurements followed by a comparison with international dose levels. DAP factor evaluation was carried out at eight radiography rooms in six public and one private health‐care centers. The study employed DAP, exposure, and demographic data (weight, age, height) for 1069 patients who presented for one of the 11 routine radiography examinations: chest (AP, PA, LAT), abdomen (AP), lumbar spine (AP, LAT), pelvis (AP), skull (AP/PA, LAT), and cervical spine (AP, LAT). The data were analyzed statistically and the minimum, median, mean, maximum, and third quartile DAP values were calculated. It was observed that LDRLs for chest PA (0.26 Gy.cm2) and chest LAT (0.66 Gy.cm2) projections were up to 136% and 113% higher, respectively, than their corresponding NRPB 2005 values. Other radiographic procedures had lower recommended reference doses compared with recently recommended national reference doses published in recent NRPB reports and other studies. Wide variations in DAP values and exposure parameters were observed for similar radiographic procedures between patients in different rooms and for different patients in the same room. These and other observations, such as poor radiographic techniques, high rate of radiographic reject/repeat, and lack of modern X‐ray machines and equipment, show that the need to carry out quality assurance programs is critical in Iran.PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.59.B
Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations
Authors: Wambani Jeska S. , Korir Geoffrey K. , Tries Mark A. , Korir Ian K. , Sakwa Jedidah M. 
Published: February 2017

The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient radiation dose received in general fluoroscopy examinations, compare the findings with the international diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs), and establish the initial institutional (local) LDRLs. A comprehensive survey was conducted for general fluoroscopy examinations using the medical records of a Radiology Department of a leading regional hospital over a period close to one year. The cumulative reference point air kerma , kerma area product (KAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were recorded for six hundred and fifty (30% pediatric and 70% adult) patients undergoing routine fluoroscopy examinations using X‐ray equipment with built‐in integrated dose measuring system. Results which were obtained for adult general fluoroscopy indicated that 83% and 33% were below the IDRLs for KAP and fluoroscopy time, respectively. In children, 60% were found to be below the only available KAP diagnostic reference levels. Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) have been proposed with respect to the missing DRLs for the Ka r, KAP, and fluoroscopy time. The majority of the examinations in the study were performed with longer fluoroscopy time, patient dose values per examination type were found to be broad and the mean values above the international diagnostic reference levels. This calls for proper and improved training and radiation protection skills for the responsible personnel, especially the equipment operators.PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.59.C‐, 87.59.cf, 87.53.Bn, 87.50.‐a, 87.53.‐j
Patient safety considerations concerning the scheduling of emergency‐off system tests
Authors: Brezovich Ivan A. , Popple Richard A. 
Published: February 2017

Emergency‐off systems (EOS) are essential to the safe operation of medical accelerators and other high‐risk equipment. To assure reliable functioning, some states require weekly tests; others permit monthly, tri‐monthly or even six‐monthly tests, while some do not specify test intervals. We investigate the relative safety of the various test schedules by computing the fraction of time during which a nonfunctional state of the EOS may remain undetected. Special attention is given to the effect of flexibility (i.e., to regulations that specify the number of tests that have to be done in any given time interval, but allow a range within the interval during which a test can be done). Compared to strict test intervals, a schedule that provides flexibility increases risk only marginally. Performing tests on any arbitrary day of the week when weekly tests are required increases the time span during which a nonfunctionality goes undetected by only 17%, compared to an exact one‐week schedule. The same ratio applies for monthly tests. For a three‐month schedule, the relative risk increases by only 2% if tests are done on an arbitrarily chosen day during each due‐month, compared to tests done on an exact three‐month schedule. The most irregular time intervals possible in a three‐calendar month schedule increase the relative risk by 11%. For the six‐month and the 12‐month schedule the ratio of risks is even smaller. The relative risk is virtually independent of the mean time between failures of the EOS, but the absolute risk decreases in proportion the mean time between failures. Adherence to strict, resource‐intensive test intervals provides little extra safety compared to flexible intervals that require the same number of tests per year. Regulations should be changed to provide the practicality offered by flexible test schedules. Any additional increase in patient safety could be achieved by strict regulations concerning reliability of emergency‐stop (e‐stop) systems.PACS numbers: 87.55.N‐, 87.55.Qr, 87.56.bd
Effect of skull contours on dose calculations in Gamma Knife Perfexion stereotactic radiosurgery
Authors: Nakazawa Hisato , Komori Masataka , Mori Yoshimasa , Hagiwara Masahiro , Shibamoto Yuta , Tsugawa Takahiko , Hashizume Chisa , Kobayashi Tatsuya 
Published: February 2017

In treatment planning of Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) radiosurgery, the skull geometry defined by generally dedicated scalar measurement has a crucial effect on dose calculation. The LGK Perfexion (PFX) unit is equipped with a cone‐shaped collimator divided into eight sectors, and its configuration is entirely different from previous model C. Beam delivery on the PFX is made by a combination of eight sectors, but it is also mechanically available from one sector with the remaining seven blocked. Hence the treatment time using one sector is more likely to be affected by discrepancies in the skull shape than that of all sectors. In addition, the latest version (Ver. 10.1.1) of the treatment planning system Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) includes a new function to directly generate head surface contouring from computed tomography (CT) images in conjunction with the Leksell skull frame. This paper evaluates change of treatment time induced by different skull models. A simple simulation using a uniform skull radius of 80 mm and anthropomorphic phantom was implemented in LGP to find the trend between dose and skull measuring error. To evaluate the clinical effect, we performed an interobserver comparison of ruler measurement for 41 patients, and compared instrumental and CT‐based contours for 23 patients. In the phantom simulation, treatment time errors were less than 2% when the difference was within 3 mm. In the clinical cases, the variability of treatment time induced by the differences in interobserver measurements was less than 0. 91%, on average. Additionally the difference between measured and CT‐based contours was good, with a difference of (mean ±1 standard deviation) on average and a maximum of 3.4%. Although the skull model created from CT images reduced the dosimetric uncertainty caused by different measurers, these results showed that even manual skull measurement could reproduce the skull shape close to that of a patient's head within an acceptable range.PACS number: 87.53.Ly