A multiple x‐ray‐source array (MXA) system with a planar two‐dimensional source distribution for digital breast tomosynthesis
Authors: Sisniega Alejandro , Hernandez Andrew M. , Shakeri Shadi A. , Morris Elizabeth A. , Boone John M. , Siewerdsen Jeffrey H. , Schwoebel Paul R. 
Published: October 2024

AbstractBackgroundDigital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has outpaced digital mammography in clinical adoption in the United States; however, substantial technological limitations remain to image quality in DBT, including undersampling from a one‐dimensional (1D) scan geometry, x‐ray source motion during acquisition, and patient motion artifacts from long exam times.PurposeA thermionic cathode x‐ray system employing two‐dimensional (2D, planar) multiple x‐ray‐source arrays (MXA) is proposed to improve DBT image quality.MethodsA 1D MXA, consisting of a linear array of thermionic cathodes was used to simulate a 2D MXA. The 1D MXA included 11 focal spots separated by a distance of = 23 mm. The 11 cathodes were paired with 11 molybdenum 50 mm diameter anode disks, mounted on a rotating shaft within a single vacuum enclosure. Image quality was investigated as a function of MXA configuration by integrating the 1D MXA with a 200 × 250 mm2 flat panel detector at a source‐to‐detector distance of 630 mm, resulting in a 20° tomographic arc. To simulate a 2D MXA, the detector (with phantom) was translated orthogonally to the linear array by a distance () ranging from = 0 mm (conventional 1D) to = 57 mm. All sources operated at 30 kV with 80 mA and 4.5 mAs/pulse, yielding ∼100 mAs per DBT dataset. DBT reconstructions involved 22 projections and used filtered backprojection with a ramp and Hann apodization filter. Volumetric reconstructions for each source were weighted by sampling differences between sources, and averaged. Image quality was assessed in terms of contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), background clutter noise and power spectrum, and slice sensitivity profile (SSP) using a set of physical phantoms, including: (i) contrast‐detail signals coupled to spherical clutter (PMMA in air); (ii) an SSP phantom; (iii) a commercial “breast” phantom (CIRS BR3D, Sun Nuclear, Norfolk, VA); and (iv) bovine muscle.ResultsBackground clutter noise amplitude reduced monotonically from the 1D MXA (σclutter = 5.9 A.U., = 0 mm) and 2D MXA arrays with increasing , with statistical significance between the 1D MXA and 2D MXA with = 57 mm (σclutter = 5.0 A.U., p < 0.001). The contrast‐detail/clutter phantom demonstrated CNR from the 2D MXA (δ = 57 mm) outperforming the 1D MXA in all combinations of contrast and detail. 2D power spectrum analysis of clutter demonstrated a pronounced Fourier domain null cone for the 1D MXA in the anterior field‐of‐view (away from the 1D MXA position), whereas the 2D MXA geometry (δ = 57 mm) did not exhibit the null cone. The SSP was 15%–50% narrower (FWHM) for the 2D versus the 1D geometry, across all reconstruction setups.ConclusionsThe advantages of a 2D source geometry for DBT imaging were demonstrated quantitatively compared to a conventional 1D line of x‐ray sources. The improvement in the 2D geometry was attributed both to improved Fourier domain sampling and reduced SSP. We conclude that 2D MXA sources have the potential to substantially improve DBT imaging in comparison to existing commercial DBT systems.