bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
MYCN oncogene amplification in neuroblastoma is associated with worse prognosis, except in stage 4s: the Italian experience with 295 children.
Authors: Tonini G P , Boni L , Pession A , Rogers D , Iolascon A , Basso G , Cordero di Montezemolo L , Casale F , Pession A , Perri P , Mazzocco K , Scaruffi P , Lo Cunsolo C , Marchese N , Milanaccio C , Conte M , Bruzzi P , De Bernardi B 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To evaluate the prognostic role of MYCN oncogene amplification in children with neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Of 694 children (age, 0 to 15 years) with previously untreated neuroblastoma, 295 (42%) were evaluated at diagnosis for MYCN gene amplification. RESULTS Clinical characteristics and survival results of 295 patients studied and 399 not studied for MYCN were comparable. In 48 of 295 patients studied for MYCN (16%), the gene was amplified (> or = three gene copies). Amplification was more frequent in children older than 1 year, with abdominal tumor (18% v 7%), advanced disease, normal vanillylmandelic (VMA) urinary excretion, and high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin, and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) serum levels. In patients studied for MYCN, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was higher for children aged less than 1 year (90% v 44%), with extraabdominal tumor, stage 1 or 2 versus 3 versus 4, and normal NSE, LDH, and ferritin serum levels. Patients with amplified MYCN had a worse OS (odds ratio [OR], 3.38; confidence interval [CI], 2.22 to 5.16). This association held after adjustment for other characteristics. The impact of MYCN amplification was greater in patients with favorable characteristics, in particular age (OR, 10.28 for infants; 2.08 for older children) and stage (OR, 35.3 for stage 1 to 2; 8.41 for stage 3; 1.76 for stage 4). However, of 29 children with stage 4s, all three with amplified MYCN survive. In a multivariate analysis, the prognostic role of MYCN amplification, age, and stage was confirmed, but the size of the effect of MYCN was dependent on age and stage. CONCLUSION MYCN amplification is associated with a worse prognosis in children with neuroblastoma at all ages and stages except 4s. This association is most pronounced in children with otherwise favorable prognostic indicators, and in these children should be considered as an indication for more intensive intervention.
Ketamine-midazolam versus meperidine-midazolam for painful procedures in pediatric oncology patients.
Authors: Marx C M , Stein J , Tyler M K , Nieder M L , Shurin S B , Blumer J L 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy, characteristics of onset/recovery, and safety of ketamine/atropine/midazolam with meperidine/midazolam used as premedication for painful procedures in children with cancer. METHODS A randomized, double-blind crossover trial for two successive painful procedures (bone marrow aspiration or biopsy, lumbar puncture, or combined procedures) was performed at a referral-based pediatric hematology-oncology clinic and associated inpatient service of a university teaching hospital. Twenty-two children, aged 24 to 178 months, were enrolled and 18 (81.8%) completed the double-blind, crossover trial. Each child received intravenous premedication with either meperidine 2 mg/kg and midazolam 0.1 mg/kg (MM) or atropine 0.01 mg/kg, midazolam 0.05 mg/kg, and ketamine 1.5 mg/kg (KM) on one occasion followed by the alternative regimen on a second occasion. The initial premedication regimen was chosen by random assignment. RESULTS Efficacy was assessed by a trained observer using the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (OSBD-R). Operator, nurse, parent, and patient opinions of efficacy were recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS). Side effects were monitored by pulse oximetry, nasal end-tidal capnography, and serial blood pressure measurements. Use of KM resulted in significantly less procedural distress than MM (1.37 +/- 2.20 v 7.04 +/- 8.06 OSBD-R units; P < .05). Both operators and nurses rated KM more effective than MM. KM use was associated with earlier readiness for the procedure (19.2 v 24.0 minutes) and more rapid recovery (39.3 v 74.6 minutes for removal of monitoring devices and 58.5 v 87.1 minutes for discharge). Procedures undertaken after ketamine sedation were associated with fewer side effects than observed with MM sedation (hypoxia, 17.7% v 82.4%; hypotension, 16.6% v 55.6%; reduced respiratory rate, 0% v 38.9%). The incidence of emergence reactions or behavioral abnormalities within 24 hours postprocedure was similar in both treatment groups. At 7 days postprocedure, no child had persistent behavioral abnormalities and all children had amnesia for the procedure. Parents and children expressed a preference for KM over MM in 12 of 18 cases (P < .05). CONCLUSION A premedication regimen of KM produced superior sedation with a faster onset and recovery and fewer side effects than a MM combination.
Impact of selection process on response rate and long-term survival of potential high-dose chemotherapy candidates treated with standard-dose doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Authors: Rahman Z U , Frye D K , Buzdar A U , Smith T L , Asmar L , Champlin R E , Hortobagyi G N 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE Most of the data about high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) for metastatic breast cancer are derived from phase II studies. The interpretation of these data depends on comparisons with data from properly selected historical control patients treated with standard therapy under similar circumstances. We report the long-term results of patients with metastatic breast cancer who were eligible for HDCT but were treated with doxorubicin-containing standard-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospectively collected data from 18 successive doxorubicin-containing protocols for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer were evaluated. Using common eligibility criteria for HDCT, we identified patients who would have been candidates for HDCT. We analyzed response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for all patients, potential HDCT candidates, and noncandidates. RESULTS A total of 1,581 patients was enrolled onto the 18 studies. Six hundred forty-five were HDCT candidates, and 936 were noncandidates. The complete response rate was 27% for HDCT candidates and 7% for noncandidates; median PFS was 16 and 8 months and median OS was 30 and 17 months, respectively. Survival rates for HDCT candidates and noncandidates, respectively, were 21% and 6% at 5 years and 7% and 2% at 10 years. CONCLUSION This study suggests that encouraging results of single-arm trials of HDCT could partially be due to selection of patients with better prognoses and further stresses the importance of completing ongoing randomized trials of HDCT to assess the relative efficacy of HDCT in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Patient selection in high-dose chemotherapy trials: relevance in high-risk breast cancer.
Authors: García-Carbonero R , Hidalgo M , Paz-Ares L , Calzas J , Gómez H , Guerra J A , Hitt R , Hornedo J , Colomer R , Cortés-Funes H 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of the selection criteria that are used in current high-dose consolidation chemotherapy (HDCT) trials on the outcome of high-risk breast cancer patients treated with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1975 to 1995, 265 breast cancer patients at our institution showed involvement of ten or more positive axillary lymph nodes. Of these, 171 received standard adjuvant combination chemotherapy, but not HDCT consolidation, and were the subjects of our study. One hundred twenty-eight patients met the standard selection criteria for HDCT with hematological support (< 60 years, no significant concomitant disease, and no progression during adjuvant treatment), whereas 43 did not. Clinical outcome was analyzed by using disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as endpoints. To provide an assessment of the short-term efficacy of HDCT, we also evaluated the outcome in a cohort of 39 patients from the last 4 years who met the criteria for, and were actually treated with, HDCT after adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 4.4 years (range, 0.7 to 17.2 years), 112 of the 171 patients have had a relapse, and 87 have died. The estimated 5-year DFS was 32.3%, and OS was 49.4%. DFS was significantly higher for patients who met the HDCT criteria (36.6% at 5 years) than for those who did not (15.8% at 5 years; P < .05). OS was also significantly more favorable in patients meeting HDCT criteria (55.4% at 5 years) than in patients not meeting HDCT criteria (22.7% at 5 years; P < .01). We performed a multivariate analysis to adjust for other potential prognostic factors and found that meeting the HDCT criteria and having undergone locoregional radiotherapy were the only significant independent predictors for DFS and OS. Finally, we compared the outcome of the 128 patients who met the HDCT criteria and were treated with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy only with that of the 39 patients who met the criteria and who actually underwent HDCT, and we did not observe significant differences in the DFS or OS between these groups. CONCLUSIONS Meeting HDCT inclusion criteria is an independent indicator of favorable prognosis in high-risk breast cancer patients. The selection of patients by these criteria may explain, at least in part, the promising short-term results of nonrandomized adjuvant HDCT trials in high-risk breast cancer.
Prospectively randomized North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial of intensive-course fluorouracil combined with the l-isomer of intravenous leucovorin, oral leucovorin, or intravenous leucovorin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Authors: Goldberg R M , Hatfield A K , Kahn M , Sargent D J , Knost J A , O'Connell M J , Krook J E , Maillard J A , Wiesenfeld M , Schaefer P L , Tirona M T , Moertel C G 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE A three-arm randomized phase III trial in advanced colorectal cancer patients was designed to test whether substitution of an equivalent dose of (1) l-leucovorin or (2) oral leucovorin would more effectively potentiate fluorouracil (5-FU) than standard intravenous (I.V.) (d,l)-leucovorin. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 926 chemotherapy-naive patients participated. Patients received one of three treatments: (A) intensive-course 5-FU plus l-leucovorin with I.V. leucovorin (Immunex Corp, Seattle, WA) at 100 mg/m2 and I.V. 5-FU at 370 mg/m2; (B) intensive-course 5-FU plus oral (d,l)-leucovorin with oral leucovarin at 125 mg/m2 on hours 0, 1, 2, and 3 (total dose, 500 mg/m2) followed by 5-FU 370 mg/m2 on hour 4; or (C) intensive-course 5-FU plus I.V. (d,l)-leucovorin with I.V. leucovorin 200 mg/m2 and 5-FU 370 mg/m2. Drugs were administered daily for 5 consecutive days. Courses were repeated at 4 and 8 weeks, and every 5 weeks thereafter. Dosage was reduced for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, stomatitis, and dermatitis. RESULTS Of 926 eligible patients, 756 have died. The overall response rate for patients with measurable disease was 32% (165 of 514). There were no differences between regimens in response rates (arm A, 28% [47 of 140]; arm B, 34% [60 of 174]; and arm C, 34% [58 of 170]) or in survival. There have been nine possible chemotherapy-related fatalities. Grade III to IV toxic effects did not differ appreciably by arm and included stomatitis (12% to 14%), diarrhea (15% to 19%), nausea (7% to 9%), and vomiting (6% to 8%). CONCLUSION There was no difference in response, survival, or toxicity between these three different leucovorin formulations combined with 5-FU.
Treatment of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia without cytarabine.
Authors: Estey E , Thall P F , Pierce S , Kantarjian H , Keating M 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To determine the effect of omission of cytarabine (ara-C) from treatment of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), which allows administration of more anthracycline. PATIENTS AND METHODS Induction consisted of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) 45 mg/m2 daily until complete remission (CR) and idarubicin 12 mg/m2 daily for 4 days beginning on day 5 of ATRA. Patients in CR received two courses of idarubicin 12 mg/m2 daily for 3 days and then, until 2 years post-CR date, alternated three cycles of mercaptopurine, vincristine, methotrexate, and prednisone (POMP) with one cycle of idarubicin 12 mg/m2 daily for 2 days. Results in the 43 patients treated (41 with t(15;17) on standard or Southern analysis) were compared with those in 57 historic newly diagnosed APL patients given ara-C with either doxorubicin, amsacrine (AMSA), or daunorubicin without ATRA, using logistic and Cox regression to assess effects of non-treatment-related covariates on patient outcomes. RESULTS The CR rate in the current group was 77% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 88%) and was not significantly different from the historic rate. In contrast, disease-free survival (DFS) in CR is superior in the current group (probability at 1 year 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.0). This has translated into superior overall DFS for the current group (P = .03 adjusting for the predictive covariates initial WBC and platelet count; 1-year DFS probability 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.82; median follow-up 102 weeks). The current treatment appears better both in patients with and without t(15; 17) on standard cytogenetic analysis. CONCLUSION Given the difficulties inherent in comparing sequential studies and recognizing the multiple differences in treatment between current and historic groups, our results suggest that a large randomized trial incorporating use of ATRA should assess the utility of omitting ara-C from treatment of newly diagnosed APL, thus allowing delivery of more anthracycline.
Paclitaxel by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin: a phase I trial in patients with advanced lung cancer.
Authors: Georgiadis M S , Schuler B S , Brown J E , Kieffer L V , Steinberg S M , Wilson W H , Takimoto C H , Kelley M J , Johnson B E 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin, to determine if the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) permits significant paclitaxel dose escalation, and to assess the toxicity and preliminary activity of this combination in patients with advanced lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty patients with untreated lung cancer were enrolled: 42 had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and eight had extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received paclitaxel doses of 100 to 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin doses of 60 to 80 mg/m2 as a single 30-minute bolus injection at the end of the paclitaxel infusion. RESULTS Two of six patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia at a dose of paclitaxel 140 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. With G-CSF support, one of three patients experienced both dose-limiting mucositis and fatal neutropenic sepsis at a dose of paclitaxel 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Significant peripheral neuropathy developed in five patients and occurred after six or more cycles of therapy. Thirty-three of 42 patients with NSCLC had measurable disease; the objective response rate was 55%, with two complete responses and 16 partial responses. For all 42 patients with NSCLC, the median time to progression and median survival duration were 5 months and 10 months, respectively. The actuarial 1-year survival rate was 41%. Of eight SCLC patients, four responded to therapy, and the median survival duration for all SCLC patients was 11 months. CONCLUSION The MTD without G-CSF is paclitaxel 120 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2, and the MTD with G-CSF is paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Infusional paclitaxel with cisplatin is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Benefit of autologous bone marrow transplantation over sequential chemotherapy in poor-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: updated results of the prospective study LNH87-2. Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.
Authors: Haioun C , Lepage E , Gisselbrecht C , Bastion Y , Coiffier B , Brice P , Bosly A , Dupriez B , Nouvel C , Tilly H , Lederlin P , Biron P , Brière J , Gaulard P , Reyes F 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To update the randomized study that compared consolidative sequential treatment (ifosfamide, etoposide, asporaginase, and cytarabine) versus the high-dose regimen of cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide (CBV) followed by autotransplantation in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in first complete remission and to focus on high-intermediate and high-risk patients identified by the international prognostic index. PATIENTS AND METHODS Nine hundred sixteen patients received induction treatment on the LNH84 protocol with open randomization for the anthracycline. In a subsequent randomization, 541 patients in complete remission were assigned to receive consolidation by either sequential chemotherapy (n = 273) or autotransplant (n = 268). Among the higher risk population (two or three risk factors), 236 patients in complete remission were assessable for the consolidation phase, with 111 in the sequential chemotherapy arm and 125 in the autotransplant arm. RESULTS Among 541 randomized patients, disease-free survival and survival did not differ significantly between the two consolidative treatment arms. In the higher risk population, CBV was superior to sequential chemotherapy, with 5-year disease-free survival rates of 59% (95% confidence interval, 49% to 69%) and 39% (95% confidence interval, 28% to 50%), respectively (P = .01, relative risk = 1.19). The 5-year survival rate was superior in the CBV group at 65% (95% confidence interval, 56% to 74%) compared with 52% in the sequential chemotherapy group (95% confidence interval, 42% to 62%) (P = .06, relative risk = 1.49). CONCLUSION This study shows a superior disease-free survival for higher risk patients in complete remission. Dose-intensive consolidation therapy should be considered for patients at higher risk who achieve complete remission after induction treatment.
Fatty acid composition of adipose tissue, an indication of dietary fatty acids, and breast cancer prognosis.
Authors: Petrek J A , Hudgins L C , Ho M , Bajorunas D R , Hirsch J 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE Fatty acid composition of adipose tissue is an indicator of the long-term ingestion pattern of several specific fatty acids. There is good correlation of antecedent diet with the essential fatty acids, and there is reflection of the diet with the fatty acids that can be synthesized. The relationship between the fatty acid levels and lymph node status and clinical outcome was examined. METHODS At the time of diagnostic surgery, 161 women with clinical stage T1NO breast cancer had subcutaneous adipose tissue (breast and abdominal) aspirated. The concentrations of 35 fatty acids, seven summed classes, and six fatty acid groups were measured by capillary gas chromatography. Lymph node status was determined with axillary dissection, and patients were followed-up (mean, 7.3 years) for clinical outcome. RESULTS There was no significant association of any adipose tissue fatty acids with overall survival, although few (16 of 161 women) died of breast cancer. However, the odds of having positive lymph nodes (57 of 161 women) were significantly higher for women with a greater adipose tissue proportion of oleic acid (odds ratio [OR], 7.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78 to 32.1) or total saturated acids (OR, 8.43; 95% CI, 1.48 to 40.0) and significantly lower with a higher proportion of trans fatty acids (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.77), as assessed by multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSION These data support previous research with dietary questionnaire methodology, suggesting that specific dietary fatty acids may be associated with breast cancer promotion. Further research with long-term clinical follow-up is necessary to investigate these observations in large, diverse populations before dietary recommendations can be envisioned.
Family history of prostate cancer in patients with localized prostate cancer: an independent predictor of treatment outcome.
Authors: Kupelian P A , Kupelian V A , Witte J S , Macklis R , Klein E A 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE To determine if familial prostate cancer patients have a less favorable prognosis than patients with sporadic prostate cancer after treatment for localized disease with either radiotherapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS One thousand thirty-eight patients treated with either RT (n = 583) or RP (n = 455) were included in this analysis. These patients were noted as having a positive family history if they confirmed the diagnosis of prostate cancer in a first-degree relative. The outcome of interest was biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). We used proportional hazards to analyze the effect of the presence of family history and other potential confounding variables (ie, age, treatment modality, stage, biopsy Gleason sum [GS], and initial prostate-specific antigen [iPSA] levels) on treatment outcome. RESULTS Eleven percent of all patients had a positive family history. The 5-year bRFS rates for patients with negative and positive family histories were 52% and 29%, respectively (P < .001). The potential confounders with bRFS rates were iPSA levels, biopsy GS, and clinical tumor stage; treatment modality and age did not appear to be associated with outcome. After adjusting for potential confounders, family history of prostate cancer remained strongly associated with biochemical failure. CONCLUSION This is the first study to demonstrate that the presence of a family history of prostate cancer correlates with treatment outcome in a large unselected series of patients. Our findings suggest that familial prostate cancer may have a more aggressive course than nonfamilial prostate cancer, and that clinical and/or pathologic parameters may not adequately predict this course.