bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Cancer Risk and Low-Penetrance Susceptibility Genes in Gene-Environment Interactions
Authors: Shields Peter G. , Harris Curtis C. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To provide a concise review for human cancer risk related to low-penetrance genes and their effects on environmental carcinogen exposure. METHODS: Citation of relevant and recent references for molecular epidemiology, focusing on lung cancer, ethical issues, and some clinical implications of recent molecular epidemiology studies. RESULTS: Low-penetrance genes contribute to cancer risk by augmenting the effects of carcinogen exposures. These exposures can be measured in the body through molecular dosimetry (ie, the amount of DNA damage), which reflects a biologically effective dose. The examination of tumors and the mutations within tumor suppressor genes, such as p53, can provide etiologic clues for both exposure and susceptibility. Although many studies have focused on carcinogen metabolism and cancer risk, more recent studies are considering DNA repair. Also, we are learning that behavior, such as tobacco addiction, also may be genetically controlled. CONCLUSION: Sporadic cancers are caused by genen-environmentn interactions rather than a dominant effect by a specific gene, environmental exposure, or gene-environment interaction. New paradigms, where we categorize genes as caretaker or gatekeeper genes, will allow for new hypotheses to be tested and will require advanced methods of analysis. The goal of molecular epidemiology is to develop risk assessment models for individuals, but currently the most achievable goal will be population risk assessment and a better understanding of carcinogenesis.
Hospital and Physician Volume or Specialization and Outcomes in Cancer Treatment: Importance in Quality of Cancer Care
Authors: Hillner Bruce E. , Smith Thomas J. , Desch Christopher E. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To conduct a comprehensive review of the health services literature to search for evidence that hospital or physician volume or specialty affects the outcome of cancer care. METHODS: We reviewed the 1988 to 1999 MEDLINE literature that considered the hypothesis that higher volume or specialization equals better outcome in processes or outcomes of cancer treatments. RESULTS: An extensive, consistent literature that supported a volume-outcome relationship was found for cancers treated with technologically complex surgical procedures, eg, most intra-abdominal and lung cancers. These studies predominantly measured in-hospital or 30-day mortality and used the hospital as the unit of analysis. For cancer primarily treated with low-risk surgery, there were fewer studies. An association with hospital and surgeon volume in colon cancer varied with the volume threshold. For breast cancer, British studies found that physician specialty and volume were associated with improved long-term outcomes, and the single American report showed an association between hospital volume of initial surgery and better 5-year survival. Studies of nonsurgical cancers, principally lymphomas and testicular cancer, were few but consistently showed better long-term outcomes associated with larger hospital volume or specialty focus. Studies in recurrent or metastatic cancer were absent. Across studies, the absolute benefit from care at high-volume centers exceeds the benefit from break-through treatments. CONCLUSION: Although these reports are all retrospective, rely on registries with dated data, rarely have predefined hypotheses, and may have publication and self-interest biases, most support a positive volume-outcome relationship in initial cancer treatment. Given the public fear of cancer, its well-defined first identification, and the tumor-node-metastasis taxonomy, actual cancer care should and can be prospectively measured, assessed, and benchmarked. The literature suggests that, for all forms of cancer, efforts to concentrate its initial care would be appropriate.
Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens
Authors: Fossella Frank V. , DeVore Russell , Kerr Ronald N. , Crawford Jeffrey , Natale Ronald R. , Dunphy Frank , Kalman Leonard , Miller Vincent , Lee Jin Soo , Moore Melvin , Gandara David , Karp Daniel , Vokes Everett , Kris Mark , Kim Yong , Gamza Francis , Hammershaimb Luz ,   the TAX Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Study Group
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To confirm the promising phase II results of docetaxel monotherapy, this phase III trial was conducted of chemotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously failed platinum-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 373 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (D100) or 75 mg/m2 (D75) versus a control regimen of vinorelbine or ifosfamide (V/I). The three treatment groups were well-balanced for key patient characteristics. RESULTS: Overall response rates were 10.8% with D100 and 6.7% with D75, each significantly higher than the 0.8% response with V/I (P = .001 and P = .036, respectively). Patients who received docetaxel had a longer time to progression (P = .046, by log-rank test) and a greater progression-free survival at 26 weeks (P = .005, by χ2 test). Although overall survival was not significantly different between the three groups, the 1-year survival was significantly greater with D75 than with the control treatment (32% v 19%; P = .025, by χ2 test). Prior exposure to paclitaxel did not decrease the likelihood of response to docetaxel, nor did it impact survival. There was a trend toward greater efficacy in patients whose disease was platinum-resistant rather than platinum-refractory and in patients with performance status of 0 or 1 versus 2. Toxicity was greatest with D100, but the D75 arm was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: This first randomized trial in this setting demonstrates that D75 every 3 weeks can offer clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced NSCLC whose disease has relapsed or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.
Phase II Trial of Doxorubicin and Docetaxel Plus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1196
Authors: Sparano Joseph A. , O’Neill Anne , Schaefer Paul L. , Falkson Carla I. , Wood William C. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: The purpose of this multi-institutional phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin and docetaxel plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective was to determine whether the combination produced a response rate of at least 50%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with metastatic breast cancer received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2 by intravenous [IV] injection) followed 1 hour later by docetaxel (60 mg/m2 by IV infusion over 1 hour) every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. All patients also received G-CSF. RESULTS: Objective response occurred in 29 (57%) of 51 eligible patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 42% to 70%), including three patients who had a complete response (6%; 95% CI, 1% to 16%). The median response duration was 7 months (95% CI, 6.0 to 15.0 months), median time to treatment failure was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.2 to 9.9 months), and the median survival was 27.5 months (95% CI, 21.5 months to upper limit not reached). The median cumulative doxorubicin dose was 395 mg/m2 (range, 60 to 480 mg/m2). Fifteen patients (28%) were documented to have a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction below normal, and three patients (6%; 95% CI, 1% to 15%) developed congestive heart failure. CONCLUSION: Using criteria that we had defined a priori, the doxorubicin-docetaxel regimen as used in this study was sufficiently active and tolerable to justify a phase III comparison with doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early-stage breast cancer.
Low-Dose Oral Fluorouracil With Eniluracil as First-Line Chemotherapy Against Advanced Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study
Authors: Smith Ian E. , Johnston Stephen R. D. , O’Brien Mary E. R. , Hickish Tamas F. , de Boer Richard H. , Norton Alison , Cirkel Deborah T. , Barton Claire M. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Eniluracil (776C85) is an effective inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase that allows continuous low-dose oral fluorouracil (5-FU) to be given with predicable oral bioavailability. We have assessed this as first-line oral chemotherapy for patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer without previous chemotherapy for advanced disease were entered onto this open-label phase II study. Patients received oral 5-FU 1.0 mg/m2 with eniluracil 10 mg/m2, both given twice daily for the first 28 days of each 35-day cycle, continuing until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were entered, with a median age of 53 years. Sixteen partial responses were seen in twenty-nine assessable patients (55%; 95% confidence interval, 37% to 73%), including responses in four (40%) out of 10 patients who had received prior adjuvant 5-FU. Seven patients had stable disease for at least 3 months with symptom improvement. Median response duration was 14 months (range, 10 to 18+ months). Toxicity was low. There were only two episodes of drug-related grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (diarrhea and infection), and only 6%, 3%, and 3% of patients developed granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenic sepsis, respectively. Mild (grade 1/2) diarrhea occurred in 39% of patients, hand-foot syndrome in 15%, nausea in 27%, and mucositis in 18%. Toxicity-associated delay and dose reduction occurred in only 2% and 5% of courses, respectively. CONCLUSION: First-line treatment with the combination of oral 5-FU and eniluracil has high activity in patients with advanced breast cancer comparable with the most active conventional cytotoxic agents but with strikingly less toxicity.
Phase III Comparative Study of Vinorelbine Combined With Doxorubicin Versus Doxorubicin Alone in Disseminated Metastatic/Recurrent Breast Cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA8
Authors: Norris B. , Pritchard K.I. , James K. , Myles J. , Bennett K. , Marlin S. , Skillings J. , Findlay B. , Vandenberg T. , Goss P. , Latreille J. , Rudinskas L. , Lofters W. , Trudeau M. , Osoba D. , Rodgers A. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: This phase III study was performed to determine the superiority of doxorubicin (DOX) and vinorelbine (VNB) (arm 1) versus DOX alone (arm 2) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) for overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred three patients were randomized to DOX 50 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and VNB 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 (arm 1) or DOX 70 mg/m2 IV on day 1 (arm 2). Both regimens were given every 3 weeks until a cumulative DOX dose of 450 mg/m2. After 16 of the first 65 randomized patients experienced febrile neutropenia (FN), the doses were reduced to DOX 40 mg/m2 on day 1 and VNB 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 versus DOX 60 mg/m2 on day 1. Eligible patients were vinca alkaloid and anthracycline naive. Chemotherapy was first-line or second-line for MBC. RESULTS: Three patients were ineligible. Thus, 300 patients were assessable for toxicity and to determine time to disease progression (TTP), TTF, and OS. Two hundred eighty-nine patients were assessable for response, and 99 responders were assessable for response duration (RD). The response rates, QOL, and median RD, TTP, and TTF were not significantly different between the arms. Median OS was 13.8 months for arm 1 versus 14.4 months for arm 2 (P = .4). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was equivalent in both arms but more grade 3/4 neurotoxicity, mild venous toxicity, and FN were seen on arm 1. CONCLUSION: The survival with DOX and VNB is not superior to DOX alone in MBC.
Second Malignancies After Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Lumpectomy and Radiation Therapy Versus Mastectomy
Authors: Obedian Edward , Fischer Diana B. , Haffty Bruce G. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To determine the risk of second malignancies after lumpectomy and radiation therapy (LRT), and to compare it with that in a similar cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy without radiation (MAST). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1970 and December 1990, 1,029 breast cancer patients at our institution underwent LRT. A cohort of 1,387 breast cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment by mastectomy (MAST), and who did not receive postoperative radiation during the same time period, served as a comparison group. Second malignancies were categorized as contralateral breast versus nonbreast. In the cohort of patients undergoing LRT, a detailed analysis was carried out with respect to age, disease stage, smoking history, radiation therapy technique, dose, the use of chemotherapy or hormone therapy, and other clinical and/or pathologic characteristics. RESULTS: As of March 1999, the median follow-up was 14.6 years for the LRT group and 16 years for the MAST group. The 15-year risk of any second malignancy was nearly identical for both cohorts (17.5% v 19%, respectively). The second breast malignancy rate at 15 years was 10% for both the MAST and LRT groups. The 15-year risk of a second nonbreast malignancy was 11% for the LRT and 10% for the MAST group. In the subset of patients 45 years of age or younger at the time of treatment, the second breast and nonbreast malignancy rates at 15 years were 10% and 5% for patients undergoing LRT versus 7% and 4% for patients undergoing mastectomy (P, not statistically significant). In the detailed analysis of LRT patients, second lung malignancies were associated with a history of tobacco use. There were fewer contralateral breast tumors in patients undergoing adjuvant hormone therapy, although this did not reach statistical significance. The adjuvant use of chemotherapy did not significantly affect the risk of second malignancies. CONCLUSION: There seems to be no increased risk of second malignancies in patients undergoing LRT using modern techniques, compared with MAST. Continued monitoring of these patient cohorts will be required in order to document that these findings are maintained with even longer follow-up periods. With nearly 15 years median follow-up periods, however, these data should be reassuring to women who are considering LRT as a treatment option.
Second Cancers Among Long-Term Survivors of Hodgkin’s Disease Diagnosed in Childhood and Adolescence
Authors: Metayer Catherine , Lynch Charles F. , Clarke E. Aileen , Glimelius Bengt , Storm Hans , Pukkala Eero , Joensuu Timo , van Leeuwen Flora E. , van’t Veer Mars B. , Curtis Rochelle E. , Holowaty Eric J. , Andersson Michael , Wiklund Tom , Gospodarowicz Mary , Travis Lois B. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To quantify the risk of second cancers among long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s disease (HD) diagnosed before 21 years of age and to explore sex-, age-, and site-related differences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 5,925 pediatric HD patients, including 2,646 10-year and 755 20-year survivors, who were reported to 16 population-based cancer registries in North America and Europe between 1935 and 1994. RESULTS: A total of 157 solid tumors (observed/expected ratio [O/E] = 7.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9 to 8.2.) and 26 acute leukemias (O/E = 27.4; 95% CI, 17.9 to 40.2) were reported. Risk of solid tumors remained significantly increased among 20-year survivors (O/E = 6.6, observed [O] = 40, cumulative risk = 6.5%) and persisted for 25 years (O/E = 4.6, O = 15, cumulative risk = 11.7%). Temporal trends for cancers of thyroid, female breast, bone/connective tissue, stomach, and esophagus were consistent with the late effects of radiotherapy. Greater than 50-fold increased risks were observed for tumors of the thyroid and respiratory tract (one lung and one pleura) among children treated before age 10. At older ages (10 to 16 years), the largest number of second cancers occurred in the digestive tract (O/E = 19.3) and breast (O/E = 22.9). Risk of solid tumors increased with decreasing age at HD on a relative but not absolute scale. CONCLUSION: Children and adolescents treated for HD experience significantly increased risks of second cancers at various sites for 2 to 3 decades. Although our results reflect the late effects of past therapeutic modalities, they underscore the importance of lifelong follow-up of pediatric HD patients given early, more aggressive treatments.
High- and Low-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b in High-Risk Melanoma: First Analysis of Intergroup Trial E1690/S9111/C9190
Authors: Kirkwood John M. , Ibrahim Joseph G. , Sondak Vernon K. , Richards Jon , Flaherty Lawrence E. , Ernstoff Marc S. , Smith Thomas J. , Rao Uma , Steele Mary , Blum Ronald H. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: Pivotal trial E1684 of adjuvant high-dose interferon alfa-2b (IFNα2b) therapy in high-risk melanoma patients demonstrated a significant relapse-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) benefit compared with observation (Obs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, three-arm, intergroup trial evaluated the efficacy of high-dose IFNα2b (HDI) for 1 year and low-dose IFNα2b (LDI) for 2 years versus Obs in high-risk (stage IIB and III) melanoma with RFS and OS end points. RESULTS: A total of 642 patients were enrolled (608 patients eligible), of whom a majority (75%) had nodal metastasis (50% had nodal recurrence). Unlike E1684, E1690 allowed entry of patients with T4 (> 4 mm) deep primary tumors, regardless of nodal dissection, and 25% of the patients entered onto this trial had deep primary tumors (compared with 11% in E1684). At 52 months’ median follow-up, HDI demonstrated an RFS benefit exceeding that of LDI compared with Obs. The 5-year estimated RFS rates for the HDI, LDI, and Obs arms were 44%, 40%, and 35%, respectively. The hazards ratio for the intent-to-treat analysis of HDI versus Obs was 1.28 (P2 = .05); for LDI versus Obs, it was 1.19 (P2 = .17). By Cox analysis, the impact of HDI on RFS achieved significance (P2 = .03). The RFS benefit was equivalent for node-negative and node-positive patients. Neither HDI nor LDI has demonstrated an OS benefit compared with Obs at this time. A major improvement in the median OS of patients in the E1690 Obs arm was noted in comparison with E1684 (6 years v 2.8 years). An analysis of salvage therapy for patients who relapsed on E1690 demonstrated that a significantly larger proportion of patients in the Obs arm received IFNα-containing salvage therapy compared with the HDI arm; this therapy was unavailable to patients during E1684, and patients with undissected regional nodes were not included in E1684. This study did not specify therapy at recurrence. Analysis of treatments received at recurrence demonstrated significantly more frequent use of IFNα2b at relapse from Obs than from HDI, which may have confounded interpretation of the survival benefit of assigned treatments in E1690. CONCLUSION: The results of the intergroup E1690 trial demonstrate an RFS benefit of IFNα2b that is dose-dependent and significant for HDI by Cox multivariable analysis.
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Oral Paclitaxel
Authors: Malingré Mirte M. , Terwogt Jetske M. Meerum , Beijnen Jos H. , Rosing Hilde , Koopman Franciska J. , van Tellingen Olaf , Duchin Ken , Huinink Wim W. Ten Bokkel , Swart Martha , Lieverst Jan , Schellens Jan H. M. 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To investigate dose escalation of oral paclitaxel in combination with dose increment and scheduling of cyclosporine (CsA) to improve the systemic exposure to paclitaxel and to explore the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 53 patients received, on one occasion, oral paclitaxel in combination with CsA, coadministered to enhance the absorption of paclitaxel, and, on another occasion, intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion. RESULTS: The main toxicities observed after oral intake of paclitaxel were acute nausea and vomiting, which reached DLT at the dose level of 360 mg/m2. Dose escalation of oral paclitaxel from 60 to 300 mg/m2 resulted in significant but less than proportional increases in the plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of paclitaxel. The mean AUC values ± SD after 60, 180, and 300 mg/m2 of oral paclitaxel were 1.65 ± 0.93, 3.33 ± 2.39, and 3.46 ± 1.37 μmol/L·h, respectively. Dose increment and scheduling of CsA did not result in a further increase in the AUC of paclitaxel. The AUC of intravenous paclitaxel was 15.39 ± 3.26 μmol/L·h. CONCLUSION: The MTD of oral paclitaxel was 300 mg/m2. However, because the pharmacokinetic data of oral paclitaxel, in particular at the highest doses applied, revealed nonlinear pharmacokinetics with only a moderate further increase of the AUC with doses up to 300 mg/m2, the oral paclitaxel dose of 180 mg/m2 in combination with 15 mg/kg oral CsA is considered most appropriate for further investigation. The safety of the oral combination at this dose level was good.
Chemotherapy in Neuroendocrine/Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Skin: Case Series and Review of 204 Cases
Authors: Tai Patricia T. H. , Yu Edward , Winquist Eric , Hammond Alex , Stitt Larry , Tonita Jon , Gilchrist Jim 
Published: February 2017

PURPOSE: To study the use of chemotherapy for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) of the skin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five cases of MCC were treated at the London Regional Cancer Center between 1987 and 1997. Thirteen cases treated with chemotherapy were reviewed with 191 cases from the literature. RESULTS: At presentation, 24 patients had localized skin lesions (stage I) and one had locoregional involvement (stage II). Among the nine cases with recurrent nodal disease, six had chemotherapy as a component of salvage treatment. They were all free of disease at a median of 19 months (range, 12 to 37 months). In contrast, two patients who had salvage radiotherapy alone died of disease. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 59% and 43%, respectively, at two years. Median OS and DFS were 29 months (range, 1 to 133 months) and 9 months (range, 1 to 133 months), respectively. Nodal disease developed in 12 (50%) of 24 patients with stage I disease, and distant metastases developed in six (25%) of 24. Including those from the literature, there were 204 cases treated with chemotherapy. Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin (or epirubicin)/vincristine combination ± prednisone was the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen (47 cases), with an overall response rate of 75.7% (35.1% complete, 35.1% partial, and 5.4% minor responses). Etoposide/cisplatin (or carboplatin) was the next most commonly used regimen (27 cases), with an overall response rate of 60% (36% complete and 24% partial responses). The difference in response rate was not statistically significant (P = .19). Among the 204 cases, there were seven (3.4%) toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: Chemoradiation for locally recurrent or advanced disease may be an option for patients with a good performance status.