Stereotactic vs Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Inoperable Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Authors: Swaminath Anand , Parpia Sameer , Wierzbicki Marcin , Kundapur Vijayananda , Faria Sergio , Okawara Gordon S. , Tsakiridis Theodoros K. , Ahmed Naseer , Bujold Alexis , Hirmiz Khalid , Owen Timothy , Leong Nelson , Ramchandar Kevin , Filion Edith , Lau Harold , Gabos Zsolt , Thompson Robert , Yaremko Brian , Mehiri Selma , Louie Alexander V. , Quan Kimmen , Levine Mark N. , Wright James R. , Whelan Timothy J. 
Published: September 2024

ImportanceStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is widely used for stage I medically inoperable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet varied results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and concerns in treating centrally located tumors persist.ObjectiveTo examine whether SBRT would improve local control (LC) compared with hypofractionated conventional radiotherapy (CRT).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 3 RCT was conducted in 16 Canadian centers. Patients with medically inoperable stage I (≤5 cm) NSCLC were randomized 2:1 to SBRT of 48 Gy in 4 fractions (peripheral NSCLC) or 60 Gy in 8 fractions (central NSCLC) vs CRT of 60 Gy in 15 fractions. Data were collected from May 2014 to January 2020, and data were analyzed from July 2022 to July 2023.InterventionsSBRT or CRT.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of SBRT compared with CRT based on LC at 3 years. Secondary outcomes included event-free survival, overall survival, and toxic effects. All radiation plans were subject to real-time/final review. Local failures were centrally adjudicated. The study was designed to detect a 3-year LC improvement of SBRT from 75% to 87.5%. The target sample size was 324 patients.ResultsOf 233 included patients, 119 (51.1%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 75.4 (7.7) years; the median (IQR) follow-up was 36.1 (26.4-52.8) months. A total of 154 patients received SBRT and 79 received CRT. The 3-year LC was 87.6% (95% CI, 81.9%-93.4%) for SBRT and 81.2% (95% CI, 71.9%-90.5%) for CRT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.31-1.20; P = .15). The HR was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.72-1.45; P = .87) for event-free survival and 1.18 (95% CI, 0.80-1.76; P = .40) for overall survival. Minimal acute toxic effects were observed. Among those randomized to SBRT, late grade 3 or 4 toxic effects occurred in 5 of 45 (11%) with central NSCLC and 2 of 109 (1.8%) with peripheral NSCLC; among those randomized to CRT, in 1 of 19 (5%) with central NSCLC and 1 of 60 (2%) with peripheral NSCLC. One patient who received SBRT for an ultracentral lesion (target overlapping proximal bronchus) experienced a possible treatment-related grade 5 event (hemoptysis).Conclusions and RelevanceThis RCT compared lung SBRT with hypofractionated CRT that included central/ultracentral tumors. No difference was detected in LC between groups. Severe toxic effects were limited, including patients with central tumors. The trial provides important prospective data evaluating SBRT; however, further research is necessary to determine if SBRT is more effective than CRT for peripheral and central NSCLC.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03924869