Race, Social Determinants of Health, and the Quality of Diabetic Eye Care
Authors: Chaudhury Azraa S. , Ige Maryam , Marwah Shikha , Zhou Xueqing , Andrews Chris A. , Kanwar Kunal , Evans Charlesnika T. , Kho Abel N. , Stein Joshua D. , Bryar Paul J. , French Dustin D. ,   Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) Consortium, Amin Sejal , Edwards Paul A. , Srikumaran Divya , Woreta Fasika , Schultz Jeffrey S. , Shrivastava Anurag , Ahmad Baseer , Vanderbeek Brian L. , Pershing Suzann , Wang Sophia Y. , Deiner Michael , Sun Catherine , Patnaik Jenna , Subramanian Prem , Munir Saleha , Munir Wuqaas , De Lott Lindsey , Ramachandran Rajeev , Feldman Robert , Stagg Brian C. , Wirostko Barbara , McMillian Brian , Sheybani Arsham , Sarrapour Soshian 
Published: September 2024

ImportanceBesides race, little is known about how other social determinants of health (SDOH) affect quality of diabetic eye care.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between multiple SDOH and monitoring for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in accordance with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study was conducted in 11 US medical centers and included adult patients (18-75 years old) with diabetes. Patients received care from 2012 to 2023 and had 18 months or more of follow-up.ExposuresMultiple SDOH and associated factors, including ethnicity, urbanicity of residence, health insurance type, and diabetes type.Main Outcomes and MeasuresAdjusted odds ratio (aOR) of receiving 1 or more eye-care visits and 1 or more dilated fundus examinations in accordance with CPGs.ResultsThe study cohort included 37 397 adults with diabetes: 10 157 Black patients and 27 240 White patients. The mean (SD) age was 58 (11) years for Black patients and 59 (11) years for White patients. Of the Black patients, 6422 (63.2%) were female and 3735 (36.8%) male; of the White patients, 13 120 (48.1) were female and 14 120 (51.8) were male. Compared with those of the same race in urban communities, Black patients (aOR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.31) and White patients (aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91) with diabetes living in rural communities had 88% and 25% lower odds of having eye-care visits, respectively. Sicker Black and White patients, defined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index, had 4% (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06) and 5% (aOR, 1.05, CI 1.04-1.06) higher odds of having an eye-care visit, respectively. Black patients with preexisting DR had 15% lower odds of visits (aOR, 0.85, CI 0.73-0.99) compared with those without preexisting DR while White patients with preexisting DR had 16% higher odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28). White patients with Medicare (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.91) and Medicaid (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96) had lower odds of eye-care visits vs patients with commercial health insurance. Hispanic White patients had 15% lower odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98) vs non-Hispanic White patients. White patients with type 1 diabetes had 17% lower odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90) vs those with type 2 diabetes. Among patients who had eye-care visits, those with preexisting DR (Black: aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.11-2.53; White: aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.16-1.96) were more likely to undergo dilated fundus examinations.Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that certain SDOH affected monitoring for DR similarly for Black and White patients with diabetes while others affected them differently. Patients living in rural communities, Black patients with preexisting DR, and Hispanic White patients were not receiving eye care in accordance with CPGs, which may contribute to worse outcomes.