Abstract A021: Development of cross-ancestry polygenic risk. scores for breast cancer in women of African ancestry
Authors: Li James L. , Zhang Haoyu , McClellan Julian C , Gao Guimin , Wang Kevin , Palmer Julie R. , Olopade Olufunmilayo I. , Haiman Christopher A. , Huo Dezheng 
Published: September 2024

Abstract
Introduction: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) predict breast cancer (BC) risk and have shown utility for screening in European ancestry women (EUR). However, PRSs developed for non-European ancestry, particularly African American (AA) women, have limited predictive accuracy. Methods: We analyzed data from 17,454 BC cases and 19,093 controls in the African American Breast Cancer Genetics (AABCG) consortium, split into training (70%), tuning (10%), and testing (20%) sets. Genome-wide association analyses for overall BC, ER-positive BC, ER- negative BC and triple-negative BC (TNBC) were performed in the training dataset, controlling for age, genotyping platform, and the top 10 principal components. We built single-ancestry PRS models using forward stepwise selection (FSS), PRSice-2, PLINK C+T, Lassosum2, and LDpred2-auto. These were combined with published EUR 313-SNP models (330-SNP for TNBC) in the tuning set to obtain cross-ancestry models. Genome-wide cross-ancestry PRS methods, including CT-SLEB and PRScsx, were also used. We created an ensemble model by combining different PRS models across subtypes using ensemble-based approaches. All developed PRS models were then evaluated in the independent testing set. Additional validation was performed using the All of Us (AoU) study with 834 BC cases and 29,122 controls from the AA population. Results: The observed-scale SNP-based heritability was estimated at 0.29 (SE: 0.12) for overall BC risk, 0.43 (SE: 0.18) for ER-positive BC, 0.44 (SE: 0.24) for ER-negative BC, and 1.13 (SE: 0.40) for TNBC. The best models showed good discriminating capacity: ensemble-based models for overall (AUC=0.626) and ER-positive BC (AUC=0.626), and combined cross-subtype and cross-ancestry FSS models for ER-negative (AUC=0.647) and TNBC (AUC=0.654). The odds ratio per standard deviation was 1.63 (95% CI: 1.55, 1.71) for the ensemble-based PRS of overall BC risk, with an estimated life risk of 28% for the top 1%. The cross-ancestry model using CT-SLEB combined with the EUR 313-SNP model was validated (AUC=0.61) among AA women in the AoU study. Conclusion: We developed PRSs with improved discriminating ability for BC risk in women with African ancestry. Cross- ancestry and subtype learning enhanced model performance. These findings indicate common variation has a larger role in BC in AA women than previously reported, warranting further validation in external AA populations and clinical evaluation.
Citation Format: James L. Li, Haoyu Zhang, Julian C McClellan, Guimin Gao, Kevin Wang, Julie R. Palmer, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Christopher A. Haiman, Dezheng Huo. Development of cross-ancestry polygenic risk. scores for breast cancer in women of African ancestry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A021.