Epitope Specific Discrepancies Between Antibody Mediated Inhibition Of Recombinant Factor VIII and Plasma Derived Factor VIII Containing Von Willebrand Factor Affecting All Domains Of Factor VIII
Authors: Livnat Tami , Dunn Amy L. , Azar-Avivi Shirley , Baldwin Wallace Hunter , Kenet Gili , Meeks Shannon L. 
Published: October 2019

Abstract

Background
Previous results from our laboratory demonstrate an epitope specific response to high doses of FVIII within anti-C2 antibodies that was independent of antibody titer. In addition, for a panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against all FVIII domains the kinetics of inhibition influenced response to combinations of FVIII and recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa). The influence of inhibitor kinetics on response to treatment has also been demonstrated in inhibitor patient plasmas. The Bethesda assay detects the inhibitory capacity of anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies to neutralize FVIII after 2 hours of incubation with pooled normal plasma (PNP). In this assay patient antibody is added to PNP as compared to the clinical scenario where recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) or plasma derived FVIII containing von Willebrand Factor (pdFVIII/VWF) is infused into the patient where antibody is already present. In this case the infused product is immediately available to interact with both VWF and anti-FVIII antibodies as compared to the Bethesda assay where VWF is already bound to FVIII when the antibody is added.

Methods
In this study we investigated the inhibitory kinetics of a panel of 20 anti-FVIII MAbs (Table) with known epitope specificity and inhibitory activity in a standard Bethesda assay. Inhibitor plasma consisted of a single MAb added to FVIII deficient plasma at 5 µg/ml. rFVIII and pd-FVIII/VWF were added to each inhibitor plasma and samples were sequentially removed at intervals between 5 and 90 minutes. FVIII activity was measured by a one-stage aPTT based assay.

Results
Of the MAb panel, 2 anti-A2 MAbs, 1D4 and 4A4, and the anti-A3 MAb F147 had full neutralization of both rFVIII and pd-FVIII/VWF. All 3 of these MAbs exhibit high inhibitory titers in the Bethesda assay. The majority of the other MAbs had improved neutralization kinetics and thus higher residual FVIII activity with pd-FVIII/VWF when compared to rFVIII. The figure below shows the residual FVIII activity at 15 minutes following the addition of rFVIII or pdFVIII/VWF into the inhibitor plasmas. Similar patterns were seen at the other time points.
Three MAbs from the panel, two anti-A2 (4C7 and B157) and one anti-C2 (2-117), had significant inhibition of FVIII activity when rFVIII was added to the inhibitor plasma. This was not demonstrated in the standard Bethesda assay or when pd-FVIII/VWF was added to the inhibitor plasma. This demonstrates that the order of binding of VWF and anti-FVIII antibodies may be clinically relevant for a subset of FVIII epitopes.

Conclusion
The Bethesda assay in isolation neither predicts inhibitory kinetics nor defines response to various FVIII sources. FVIII source dependent neutralization kinetics and epitope mapping may be applied as additional tools for tailoring therapy in patients with inhibitors.

Disclosures:
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.