bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
FOLFOX rechallenge versus regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy: A retrospective analysis.
Authors: Calegari Maria Alessandra , Zurlo Ina Valeria , Di Stefano Brunella , Camarda Floriana , Di Dio Carmela , Garufi Giovanna , Cassano Alessandra , Barone Carlo Antonio , Bria Emilio , Basso Michele , Orlandi Armando 
Published: January 2019

669 Background: Nowadays the optimal treatment for mCRC beyond second line is still questioned. During last years, regorafenib and TAS-102 showed to improve survival compared to best supportive care in pts with refractory mCRC. Recently, some retrospective analyses compared the efficacy and safety of regorafenib and TAS-102 reporting no significant differences in survival and response outcomes. In real-world clinical practice, chemotherapy (CT) rechallenge is often considered for refractory mCRC. However, evidences regarding CT rechallenge is limited and no study has previously compared such approach with the recently approved antineoplastic agents in late lines. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy between CT rechallenge and regorafenib in pts with refractory mCRC. Methods: This is a mono-institutional retrospective study. We compared the efficacy of FOLFOX rechallenge and regorafenib in pts with mCRC refractory to at least 2 lines of standard CT, treated at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli”-IRCCS between Jan-10 and Jan-18. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were RR and PFS. Results: One hundred thirty-one pts received regorafenib and 43 FOLFOX rechallenge. OS was significantly higher with FOLFOX rechallenge than it was with regorafenib (13 vs. 6 months; HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.33-0.66; p = 0.0002). PFS was significantly higher in the FOLFOX rechallenge group compared to the regorafenib group (5 vs. 3 months; HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.89; p = 0.0073). Accordingly, RR was better in pts receiving FOLFOX rechallenge compared to regorafenib (25 vs. 3%; Chi-square p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our study, although retrospective and small-sized, compared for the first time to our knowledge the efficacy of CT rechallenge to regorafenib in refractory mCRC. In our analysis, CT rechallenge with FOLFOX proved to be superior compared to regorafenib, with a survival and response benefit in pretreated mCRC. The survival benefit observed for rechallenge might be explained by the significantly higher tumor shrinkage achieved with CT rechallenge compared to regorafenib. Our results warrant further confirmation in wider and/or prospective analyses.
Exploratory analysis of the effect of FTD/TPI in patients treated in RECOURSE by prognostic factors.
Authors: Tabernero Josep , Sobrero Alberto F. , Borg Christophe , Ohtsu Atsushi , Mayer Robert J. , Vidot Loïck , Moreno Vera Shanti Ricardo , Van Cutsem Eric 
Published: January 2019

677 Background: The Phase III RECOURSE trial, in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies, demonstrated that trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) significantly extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in all subgroups, regardless of age, geographical origin, or KRAS status, with acceptable safety. Literature reports have shown optimal benefit for pts with low tumor burden (< 3 metastatic sites), indolent disease (≥ 18 mo since diagnosis of first metastasis), ECOG PS 0-1, and no liver metastasis when treated in late line mCRC. Methods: This exploratory post hoc analysis of RECOURSE (all ECOG 0-1) compared pts on FTD/TPI or placebo with good prognostic characteristics (GPC; low tumor burden and indolent disease) and poor prognostic characteristics (PPC; high tumor burden and/or aggressive disease). These subgroups were then analyzed by liver metastasis at baseline, ECOG PS, KRAS status and age. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the two groups. GPC placebo pts performed better than the PPC placebo pts, but worse than the GPC pts treated with FTD/TPI. GPC pts treated with FTD/TPI showed median OS of 9.3 mo versus 5.3 mo in PPC pts (HR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.57; p < 0.0001); there was a similar effect for PFS. GPC pts had significantly better mOS and mPFS regardless of age (≥ 65 vs. < 65 y), ECOG PS (0–1), KRAS status (mutant vs. wildtype), and liver metastasis (y/n). No liver metastasis was the best prognostic factor: mOS in such pts treated with FTD/TPI was 16.4 mo and 7.6 mo in the GPC (n = 97) and PPC (n = 35) groups, respectively (HR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.74; p < 0.0019); there was a similar effect for PFS. Pts with ECOG PS 0 at baseline remained PS 0-1 at discontinuation in 96% of the GPC group. Conclusions: Low tumor burden and indolent disease indicate good prognosis in late line mCRC. Pts with no liver metastasis have the best prognosis and are likely to have longer OS. GPCs might explain the percentage of long-term responders on FTD/TPI in RECOURSE. Maintenance of ECOG PS 0–1 during treatment is crucial in the continuum of care, allowing pts to benefit from further treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT01607957.
KRAS amplification and mutation are independent events in gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA).
Authors: Madison Russell , Chao Joseph , Ross Jeffrey S. , Miller Vincent A. , Ali Siraj Mahamed , Schrock Alexa Betzig , Klempner Samuel Jacob 
Published: January 2019

70 Background: KRAS mutations are common oncogenic events across cancers, but effective RAS-directed therapies are lacking. However, recent studies support use of PD-1 blockade in most subsets of lung cancer with KRAS short variant mutations (KRASSV) (PMID: 28039262), and preclinical data supports combined MEK and SHP2 inhibition in KRAS amplified ( KRASa) GEA (PMID: 30093730). We sought to explore the landscape of KRAS altered GEA and compare genomic profiles of KRAS-altered and KRAS wild-type (WT) cases for biomarkers of response to targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: 6,667 tissue specimens from patients with advanced GEA were assayed using hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined on up to 1.1 Mbp of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability (MSI) was determined on 95 or 114 loci. Descriptive statistics were used to compare among subgroups. Results: KRASSV and KRASa were identified in 11% and 5.8% of gastric adenocarcinoma (GA), respectively, and in 7.2% and 17% of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA), respectively. KRASa and KRASSV were nearly mutually exclusive, co-occurring in only 4.4% of KRAS altered cases. ERBB2 alterations were less common in KRASSV and KRASa GEA (both 9%) as compared with KRAS WT GEA (19%) (p = 1.9E-16). EGFRa was less common in KRASSV versus KRASa GEA (1.9% vs. 9.3%, p = 2.6E-8), whereas PIK3CASV was more common in KRASSV versus KRASa (16% vs 5.0%, p = 1.5E-11). Median TMB for all groups was similar; however, KRASSV GEA had a higher mean TMB (9.7 mut/Mb) as compared to KRASa (5.1 mut/Mb, p = 5.0E-12) and KRAS WT cases (5.8 mut/Mb, p = 2.2E-07). KRAS codon 12/13 accounted for > 80% of predicted pathogenic mutations. MSI-high was also more prevalent in KRASSV (11.4%) versus KRASa (0.9%, p = 4.8E-15) and KRAS WT GEA (3.0%, p = 1.8E-25). MSI-high KRASSV GEA was associated with older patient age (median 72 years) and with high TMB (median 40.9 mut/mb). Conclusions: GA was enriched for KRAS mutation whereas EA was enriched for KRAS amplification. KRAS WT versus KRASSV versus KRASa each presented distinct genomic profiles. KRASa in the absence of KRAS mutation exists in 11% of GEA and warrants further exploration to inform combination treatment strategies.
Synchronous brain metastasis and impact of primary tumor side in colorectal cancers.
Authors: Muzaffar Mahvish , Naqash Abdul Rafeh 
Published: January 2019

712 Background: 25% of patients with colorectal cancer(CRC) present with synchronous metastatic disease. The incidence of brain metastasis (BM) in CRC is very low (1.2–3.2%) and tend to occur later in the disease course. Synchronous BM(SBM) in CRC is very rare. We sought to explore the impact of primary tumor characteristics on SBM. Methods: Surveillance Epidemiology End Results Program (SEER) 18 registries research data on primary colorectal cancer cases diagnosed during 2010-2015 with brain metastasis at diagnosis were identified. Patients with unlabeled primary site and autopsy alone cases were excluded. Demographic and colorectal cancer characteristics including age, gender, race, tumor grade and primary tumor side were analyzed. Logistic regression model was used to test the association between survival and side of cancer. Results: A total of 475 cases met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 64.04 yrs. (range 28-95). Majority of the patients (80%) were white, 12% black and others (8%), Male: Female ratio was 1:1.58% patients had primary tumor on left side (splenic flexure, sigmoid, rectosigmoid and rectal) and 42% had right sided (ascending colon, hepatic flexure, cecum, transverse colon) primary tumor. The median overall survival was 5 months with 1-year survival of 26% in the whole cohort. The 1-year overall survival was 21% for patients with right sided primary tumor versus 30% for patients with SBM and left sided primary tumor(p = 0.03). The median disease specific survival was 5 months for right side and 7 months for Left sided tumor with SBM. The regression model showed that higher grade (RR 14, p = 0.003)) and right sided primary tumor (RR 4.2, p = 0.04) were associated with worse outcome among patients with SBM in colorectal cancer. Conclusions: Synchronous brain metastasis is very rare in colorectal cancer. Tumor side seems to be prognostic even in this aggressive disease subset. This differential outcome further indicates that sidedness should be considered in goals of care and treatment discussion.
A phase Ib study of nivolumab plus trastuzumab with S-1/capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer (Ni-HIGH study).
Authors: Takahari Daisuke , Wakatsuki Takeru , Ishizuka Naoki , Fukuda Naoki , Shoji Hirokazu , Hara Hiroki , Minashi Keiko , Boku Narikazu , Yamaguchi Kensei 
Published: January 2019

TPS177 Background: Trastuzumab (Tmab) with cisplatin and fluoropyrimidines improved the overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with HER2 (+) advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Nivolumab (Nivo) is an anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody that demonstrated a survival benefit as third line or later of AGC. To date, most trials investigating anti-PD-1 antibody for 1st line treatment focus on HER2 (-) AGC. In HER2(+) breast cancer mouse model, combining Tmab with anti-PD-1 antibody was reported to enhance ADCC activity of Tmab, and show greater tumor regression. In our data, the PD-L1 expression was observed in 44% of tumor cells and 70% of immune cells in human HER2(+) AGC. Based on these data, we have plannedthis phase Ib investigator-initiated trial to investigate the safety and tolerabirity of Nivo plus Tmab and either S-1 or capecitabine (Cape) plus Oxaliplatin (Ox) for pts with HER2(+) AGC. Methods: Histopathologically confirmed HER2(+) AGC with mesurable lesions, aged > 20 years, chemo-naïve pts are enrolled in this study. Pts receive Nivo (360 mg/body; day 1) plus Tmab (course1, 8 mg/kg; course 2 onward, 6 mg/kg; day 1) and either S-1 (40 mg/m2 bid d1-14; cohort 1) or Cape (1000 mg/m2 bid d1-14; cohort 2) plus Ox (130 mg/m2; day 1) every three weeks until desease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In the primary part, six pts for each cohort will be assessed for tolerability.To estimate the objective response rate (ORR) in the analysis-set, on our hypothesis that a true response rate is 80%, 20 pts are required for the 90% C.I. to be ± 20%. Therefore the expansion part for each cohort will be 12-15 pts. Primary endpoint is safety. Secondary endpoint is tolerability and exploratory endpoints include ORR, disease control rate, progression free survival and OS. Collaborative biomarker analysis includes whole exome sequences, RNA sequences, gut microbiome, and IHC using biopsy specimens. In addition, T-cell repartry, circulating tumor DNA and exomes will be also analyzed using blood obtained during treatment. This study just has been initiated at four sites in Japan. Clinical trial information: UMIN000034222.
Multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of comparing laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for upper third early gastric cancer (KLASS-05).
Authors: Park Do Joong , Kim Hyung-Ho , Han Sang Uk , Hyung Woo Jin , Hwang Sun-Hwi , Hur Hoon , Yang Han-Kwang , Lee Hyuk-Joon , Kim Hyoung-Il , Kim Young Woo , Kong Seong-Ho , Lee Han Hong , Park Youngkyu , Lee In Seob , Kim Beom Su , Lee Young-Joon , Park Ji-Ho , Suh Yun-Suhk , Ahn Sang-Hoon 
Published: January 2019

TPS184 Background: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is rarely performed for upper third early gastric cancer (EGC) because of postoperative reflux esophagitis. Recently, PG with double tract reconstruction was introduced and reported to have a reflux of approximately the same frequency as total gastrectomy (TG) with esophagojejunostomy. PG has several theoretical advantages over TG but has not yet been proven in randomized controlled trial. This study aimed to provide scientific evidence of laparoscopic PG with double tract reconstruction as a standard procedure for proximal EGC. Methods: The present trial is multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial with superiority design. A total of 138 patients with upper third cT1N0M0 gastric adenocarcinoma are randomized to laparoscopic PG with double tract reconstruction and laparoscopic TG with esophagojejunostomy. Patients are enrolled for two years and followed up for two years. Primary co-endpoints are hemoglobin change and vitamin B12 cumulative supplement quantity after 2 years of operation. We used the alpha-split method to set the hemoglobin to 4% and vitamin B12 to 1% for alpha. The sample size needed was 62 patients for each arm. Accounting for 10% follow-up loss, the enrollment of 69 patients in each group was required. Secondary endpoints are prevalence rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis, morbidity and mortality, quality of life 2-year after operations, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. Nineteen investigators from 10 institutes participated in this trial. The first patient was enrolled on October 27, 2016 and we completed the patient enrollment on September 17, 2018. Clinical trial information: NCT02892643.
A randomized phase II study of cabiralizumab (cabira) + nivolumab (nivo) ± chemotherapy (chemo) in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Authors: Wang-Gillam Andrea , O'Reilly Eileen Mary , Bendell Johanna C. , Wainberg Zev A. , Borazanci Erkut Hasan , Bahary Nathan , O'Hara Mark H. , Beatty Gregory Lawrence , Pant Shubham , Cohen Deirdre Jill , Leong Stephen , Beg Muhammad Shaalan , Yu Kenneth H. , Evans T.R. Jeffry , Seufferlein Thomas , Okusaka Takuji , Phillips Penny , Liu Xuan , Perna Serena K , Le Dung T. 
Published: January 2019

TPS465 Background: Treatment options for PDAC are limited; thus, new therapies that can improve outcomes and extend survival are needed. PDAC is associated with high infiltration by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) that inhibit antitumor T-cell activity. Blocking colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling—which supports the recruitment, differentiation, and maintenance of immunosupressive macrophages in tumors—may lead to depletion of TAMs and upregulation of T-cell checkpoints. Cabira, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody, binds to CSF-1R and blocks its signaling, a key determinant of TAM activation and survival. By reducing TAMs and promoting a proinflammatory microenvironment, cabira may stimulate T-cell responses, thereby sensitizing PDAC to therapy with nivo (anti‒PD-1). In a phase 1a/b study cabira + nivo was tolerable and showed evidence of on-target tumor immune modulation and durable clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with advanced PDAC (Wainberg et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2017 [abst O42]; Carleton et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 [abst 3020]). Here we describe a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of cabira + nivo ± chemo in advanced PDAC. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 y with locally advanced/metastatic PDAC that progressed on/after first-line chemo (gemcitabine [gem] or 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] based) will be enrolled. Pts with active/suspected autoimmune disease, uncontrolled/significant cardiovascular disease, or prior exposure to select immune cell–modulating antibodies are not eligible. Depending on prior chemo received, pts will be randomized to 1 of 4 arms (n≈40 each): cabira + nivo; cabira + nivo + gem/nab-paclitaxel; cabira + nivo + oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin; or investigator’s choice of standard-of-care chemo. Endpoints include median progression-free survival (primary), overall survival rate, objective response rate, median duration of response, pharmacokinetics, and safety. In a completed preliminary safety cohort, 12 pts were treated with cabira + nivo + chemo and monitored for 4 wk; competitive enrollment is open, with 32 pts enrolled. (NCT03336216, NCT02526017) Clinical trial information: NCT03336216.
MORPHEUS: A phase Ib/II study platform evaluating the safety and clinical efficacy of cancer immunotherapy (CIT)–based combinations in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.
Authors: Desai Jayesh , Kortmansky Jeremy S. , Segal Neil Howard , Fakih Marwan , Oh Do-Youn , Kim Kyu-Pyo , Rahma Osama E. , Ko Andrew H. , Chung Hyun Cheol , Alsina Maria , Yeh Kun-Huei , Li Shi , Al-Sakaff Nedal Jaffer Abdulla , Patel Jilpa , Barak Hila , Wang Jun , Zhang Xiaosong , Bleul Conrad , Cha Edward , Lee Jeeyun 
Published: January 2019

TPS467 Background: CIT has significant survival benefits across multiple tumor types, but durable response is experienced by only subsets of patients (pts). To extend clinical benefit to more pts, efficacious CIT combinations (combos) targeting multiple cancer immune escape mechanisms need to be identified. The MORPHEUS platform includes multiple ph Ib/II trials designed to identify early signals of safety and efficacy of CIT combos. Using a randomized trial design, multiple treatment (tx) arms are compared with a single control arm in each pt cohort. We present three GI-specific MORPHEUS trials, each assessing CIT combos that could concurrently enhance multiple aspects of the cancer immune response. Methods: The MORPHEUS trials described here are global, open-label, randomized, Ph Ib/II trials enrolling pts with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers or colorectal cancer (CRC). New arms with novel CIT combos (table) are opened as new txs become available, and arms with minimal efficacy or unacceptable toxicity are closed. Studies include multiple cohorts for pts receiving different lines of tx (1L and 2L PDAC and gastric; 3L CRC). Pts with loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity may be eligible to enroll in a different CIT combo arm. Primary endpoints include safety and investigator-assessed ORR (RECIST v1.1); secondary endpoints: PFS, OS, DCR and DOR. Clinical trial information: NCT03193190, NCT03281369, NCT03555149. [Table: see text]
FOENIX-101: A phase II trial of TAS-120 in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 gene rearrangements.
Authors: Goyal Lipika , Bahleda Rastilav , Furuse Junji , Valle Juan W. , Moehler Markus Hermann , Oh Do-Youn , Chang Heung-Moon , Kelley Robin Kate , Javle Milind M. , Borad Mitesh J. , Chen Li-Tzong , Uboha Nataliya Volodymyrivna , Klumpen Heinz-Josef , O'Dwyer Peter J. , Li Daneng , Morizane Chigusa , Huang Jerry , Bridgewater John A. 
Published: January 2019

TPS468 Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a cancer arising from the intrahepatic bile duct. Standard treatment of unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic iCCA is with cytotoxic chemotherapy. FGFR2 gene fusions have been identified as oncogenic drivers in 10–20% of iCCA tumors, but no targeted agents have been established to date. TAS-120 is an investigational irreversible FGFR1–4 inhibitor in development as a once-daily oral treatment for iCCA. Based on initial studies in multiple tumor types expressing FGFR abnormalities, iCCA was identified as a tumor type with potential susceptibility to FGFR inhibition and high unmet need. A phase I portion of the trial with an iCCA expansion cohort demonstrated tolerability and preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy with TAS-120 as a continuous, once-daily oral treatment in patients with iCCA. The most common AEs in the phase I portion of the trial were hyperphosphatemia, a mechanism-based on-target side effect, cutaneous AEs, and gastrointestinal AEs. The phase I portion of the study is continuing to enroll, and final results are anticipated in early 2019. Based on preliminary findings, a phase II portion of the study (FOENIX-101; clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02052778) has been initiated. Methods: The phase II portion of the trial is a global, single-arm study of TAS-120 in patients with iCCA harboring FGFR2 gene rearrangements. The study will enroll approximately 100 adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic iCCA that progressed after ≥ 1 systemic therapies and with an ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Prior systemic therapy must include gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. Screening for FGFR2 gene rearrangements will be performed at a central laboratory. The primary endpoint is objective response rate based on RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, safety, and health-related quality of life. Clinical trial information: NCT02052778.