Clinical Impact of Diagnostic Breast Ultrasound Performed by Generalist Doctors and Nurses in Rwanda
Authors: Pace Lydia E. , Dusengimana J.M.V. , Rugema Vestine , Hategekimana Vedaste , Bigirimana Jean Bosco , Shyirambere Cyprien , Shabani Kassim , Butonzi John , Raja Sahitya C. , Umwizerwa Aline , Shulman Lawrence N. , Sebahungu Fidele , Muvugabigwi Gaspard , Mpunga Tharcisse , Raza Sughra 
Published: October 2018

Purpose Diagnostic breast ultrasound (US) can be an important tool for the early detection of breast cancer in low-resource settings where efficient strategies to refine the likelihood of malignancy among palpable breast masses are needed. However, the feasibility and clinical role of breast US in such settings has not been described. We trained four general practitioners and five nurses in diagnostic breast US at a rural Rwandan district hospital that serves as a cancer referral facility. We examined management plans, biopsy rates, and patient diagnoses after trainee breast US to determine the impact on clinical care. Methods We abstracted US assessment forms and medical records to determine outcomes from trainee US during 21 months of in-person and electronic training by Boston-based radiologists. We examined management plans, biopsy rate, cancer detection rate, rate of benign diagnoses, and cancers diagnosed among patients discharged after initial evaluation. Results Between January 2016 and September 2017, 307 patients had trainee-performed diagnostic breast US. After US, 158 (51%) were recommended to undergo biopsy, 30 (10%) were recommended to have aspiration/drainage, 49 (16%) were recommended for clinical/US surveillance, one (0.3%) was referred elsewhere, 65 (21%) were discharged, and four—all with no abnormalities on US—had missing recommendations. Of those recommended for initial biopsy, 151 patients (96%) underwent biopsy at that time. Fifty-six patients (37%) were diagnosed with breast cancer, 44 (30%) with fibroadenoma, and 50 (33%) with other benign diagnoses. Among those with breast masses on US (n = 255), 149 patients (58%) underwent biopsy and 55 (22%) were diagnosed with cancer. As of November 2017, all patients ultimately diagnosed with cancer had had a biopsy at their initial visit. No patients who had been discharged or were receiving surveillance had been subsequently diagnosed with cancer. Conclusion Diagnostic breast US by general practitioners and nurses has been a useful tool for the evaluation of breast lesions at a rural Rwandan facility and has helped avoid biopsy for 42% of patients with breast masses on US. Clinical follow-up is ongoing to assess longer-term outcomes and examine cancer detection rates and loss-to-follow-up rates among patients not initially biopsied. AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/site/ifc . Lydia E. Pace Stock or Other Ownership: Firefly Health Sughra Raza Honoraria: Fujifilm Medical Services Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Fujifilm Medical Services