Genetic Basis of Myeloid Proliferation Related to Down Syndrome
Authors: Yoshida Kenichi , Toki Tsutomu , Park Myoung-ja , Okuno Yusuke , Shiraishi Yuichi , Sanada Masashi , Kon Ayana , Nagata Yasunobu , Sato-Otsubo Aiko , Sato Yusuke , Wang RuNan , Terui Kiminori , Kanezaki Rika , Shiba Norio , Chiba Kenichi , Tanaka Hiroko , Hama Asahito , Hasegawa Daisuke , Nakamura Kazuhiro , Kanegane Hirokazu , Tsukamoto Keiko , Adachi Souichi , Miyano Satoru , Kojima Seiji , Izraeli Shai , Hayashi Yasuhide , Ito Etsuro , Ogawa Seishi 
Published: October 2019

Abstract
Abstract 535

Background
Transient abnormal myelopoiesis (TAM) represents a self-limited proliferation exclusively affecting perinatal infants with Down syndrome (DS), morphologically and immunologically characterized by immature blasts indistinguishable from acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL). Although spontaneous regression is as a rule in most cases, about 20–30% of the survived infants develop non-self-limited AMKL (DS-AMKL) 3 to 4 years after the remission. As for the molecular pathogenesis of these DS-related myeloid proliferations, it has been well established that GATA1 mutations are detected in virtually all TAM cases as well as DS-AMKL. However, it is still open to question whether a GATA1 mutation is sufficient for the development of TAM, what is the cellular origin of the subsequent AMKL, whether additional gene mutations are required for the progression to AMKL, and if so, what are their gene targets, although several genes have been reported to be mutated in occasional cases with AMKL, including JAK2/3, TP53 and FLT3.

Methods
To answer these questions, we identify a comprehensive spectrum of gene mutations in TAM/AMKL cases using whole genome sequencing of three trio samples sequentially obtained at initial presentation of TAM, during remission and at the subsequent relapse phase of AMKL. Whole exome sequencing was also performed for TAM (N=16) and AMKL (N=15) samples, using SureSelect (Agilent) enrichment of 50M exomes followed by high-throughput sequencing. The recurrent mutations in the discovery cohort were further screened in an extended cohort of DS-AMKL (N = 35) as well as TAM (N = 26) and other AMKL cases (N = 19) using target deep sequencing.

Results
TAM samples had significantly fewer numbers of somatic mutations compared to AMKL samples with the mean numbers of all mutations of 30 (1.0/Mb) and 180 (6.0/Mb) per samples in whole genome sequencing or non-silent somatic mutations of 1.73 and 5.71 per sample in whole exome sequencing in TAM and AMKL cases, respectively (p=0.001). Comprehensive detections of the full spectrum of mutations together with subsequent deep sequencing of the individual mutations allowed to reveal more complicated clonological pictures of clonal evolutions leading to AMKL. In every patient, the major AMKL clones did not represent the direct offspring from the dominant TAM clone. Instead, the direct ancestor of the AMKL clones could be back-traced to a more upstream branch-point of the evolution before the major TAM clone had appeared or, as previously reported, to an earlier founder having an independent GATA1 mutation. Intratumoral heterogeneity was evident at the time of diagnosis as the presence of major subpopulations in both TAM and AMKL populations, which were more often than not characterized by RAS pathway mutations.
While GATA1 was the only recurrent mutational target in the TAM phase, 8 genes were recurrently mutated in AMKL samples in whole genome/exome sequencing, including NRAS, TP53 and other novel gene targets that had not been previously reported to be mutated in other neoplasms. The recurrent mutations found in the discovery cohort, in addition to known mutational targets in myeloid malignancies, were screened in an extended cohort of DS-associated myeloid disorders (N=61) as well as other AMKL cases, using high-throughput sequencing of SureSelect-captured and/or PCR amplified targets. Secondary mutations other than GATA1 mutations were found in 3 out of 26 TAM, 20 out of 35 DS-AMKL and 4 out of 19 other AMKL cases.

Conclusion
TAM is characterized by a paucity of somatic mutations and thought to be virtually caused by a GATA1 mutation in combination with constitutive trisomy 21. Subsequent AMKL evolved from a minor independent subclone acquiring additional mutations. Secondary genetic hits other than GATA1 mutations were common, where deregulated epigenetic controls as well as abnormal signaling pathway mutations play a major role.

Disclosures:
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.