Lipid lowering therapy and the unmet targets in Indian patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease: results from the OLS registry
Authors: Mahajan K , Gupta A , Rana V , Bhatnagar M , Gawalkar A , Yadav R , Kumar D , Bhatia T , Thakur P , Pratap A , Khandelwal S , Sharma J B , Teja P , Agarwala R , Puri R 
Published: October 2024

Abstract

Introduction
The Lipid Association of India (LAI) 2020 guidelines classify patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in either very high-risk or extreme-risk groups and recommend that intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) should be administered to such patients to achieve a target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level below 50 mg/dl at least (preferably &lt; 30 mg/dl in extreme risk groups).

Purpose
This study aimed to assess the achievement of the LAI-recommended LDL-C goals in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods
The Optimization of LDL-C in the Stable CAD (OLS) registry started in August 2023 in 10 interventional cardiology centers across Northern India. Interventional cardiologists (ICs) were treating all enrolled patients with angiographically proven stable CAD, and data were collected at a single visit, including the most recent LDL-C and the LLT in the preceding three months of that LDL-C reading. The primary outcome was achieving the LAI-recommended LDL-C goal of &lt;50 mg/dl. The achievement of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) recommended goal of &lt;70 mg/dl was also assessed.

Results
A total of 1860 patients with angiographically proven CAD were enrolled in this ongoing registry over four months (August 2023- November 2023). The mean age of the study population was 60.2 + 9.2 years, and 79% were males. 30.3% of patients had Diabetes mellitus (DM), 36.1% had hypertension (HTN), 42.3% were obese (body mass index &gt; 25kg/m2), and 17.8% of patients were current smokers. 74.2% of patients had a history of myocardial infarction, while 76.7% had undergone prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Rosuvastatin was the statin prescribed in 59.4% of patients, while atorvastatin was prescribed in 37.2%. 1270 (68.3%) of patients were taking high-intensity statin (HIS) therapy (either 20-40 mg rosuvastatin or 40-80 mg atorvastatin). Only 22 (1.2%) patients took other lipid-lowering agents, including ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and fibrates. None of the patients were using PCSK9 Inhibitors. Only 482(25.9%) patients achieved their LAI recommended goal of LDL-C &lt;50 mg/dl, 113(6.1%) achieved LDL-C &lt; 30 mg/dl, while 863(46.4%) achieved ACC goal of &lt;70 mg/dl. Notably, only 62(3.3%) patients were not taking any lipid-lowering treatment.

Conclusion
Results of the OLS study demonstrate the high-risk status of CAD in Indian patients with a high prevalence of DM, HTN, and obesity. Most patients were post-PCI/CABG, mainly because ICs did enrolments. More than two-thirds of patients were taking HIS and very few were not taking any treatment. Despite this, only one-fourth of patients achieved the target LDL-C goals. Greater and early utilization of combination LLT, including HIS and non-statin LLT, is likely needed to reduce these gaps for patients at the highest risk.