Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Novel Conditioning Regimen, Individualized Once-Daily Intravenous Busulfan with Bortezomib, in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing a Second Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Authors: Freytes Cesar O. , Toro Juan J. , Yeh Rosa F. , Stadtmauer Edward A. , Ratanatharathorn Voravit , Akpek Gorgun , Sahovic Entezam , Tricot Guido J. , Shaughnessy Paul J. , White Darrell J. , Rodriguez Tulio E. , Solomon Scott R. , Yu Louie H. , Patil Shiva , Sun Yiping , Armstrong Elizabeth , Elekes Agnes , Kato Kazunobu , Reece Donna E. 
Published: October 2019

Abstract
Abstract 4509

BACKGROUND:
Once multiple myeloma (MM) relapses after a first autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), long-term disease control is challenging because of limited therapeutic options. A second autologous HSCT is one of the options although the choice of conditioning regimens has not been thoroughly investigated. Past studies demonstrated that adding oral busulfan (Bu) to melphalan for conditioning regimen prior to a first HSCT resulted in better disease control of MM than melphalan single administration [Lahuerta et al, Haematologica. 2010;95:1913]. Nonetheless, the risk of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) hinders the use of oral Bu as a part of the conditioning regimen. Intravenous (IV) Bu eliminates the unpredictable bioavailability of the oral drug, whereas pharmacokinetic (PK)-directed dose optimization reduces inter-individual variability in the metabolism of Bu, resulting in decreased incidence of VOD and improvement in the control of hematologic malignancies [Andersson et al, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2002;8:477]. In addition, a proteasome inhibitor like bortezomib may have synergy with an alkylating agent for conditioning prior to HSCT in myeloma [Lonial et al, Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16: 5079], but the safety of a combination with Bu has not been investigated to date. Here we report results from a multicenter, prospective Phase 2 study to examine the pharmacokinetics of IV Bu and safety with bortezomib as a conditioning regimen for a second autologous HSCT.

METHODS:
30 patients with relapsed MM who had a first autologous HSCT ≥1 year prior to the planned HSCT were enrolled from eleven centers in the US and Canada. Patients received a test dose of IV Bu (0.8 mg/kg) over 2 hours between days 12 and 9 prior to HSCT. Serial blood samples were drawn up to 360 min after the start of the infusion. A central laboratory measured Bu concentrations, determined Bu exposure as area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) using WinNonlin software, and recommended individualized PK-directed dosing in order to achieve a total regimen AUC of 20,000 μM·min. Using the patient-specific PK-directed dose, IV Bu was administered over 3 hours once daily from Day -5 to Day -2. In all patients, a second PK analysis was conducted on Day -5 to confirm the PK-directed dose. Bu doses were adjusted on Day -3 and Day -2, if needed. Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 QD) was administered as an IV bolus injection on Day -1.

RESULTS:
All 30 patients who enrolled in this study had been treated with high dose melphalan before a first HSCT. The median time from the first to second HSCT was 31.4 months (range 12.0 – 119.2 months). Disease status prior to the second HSCT was VGPR (n=6), PR (n=12), SD (n=2), and PD (n=10). Test PK revealed that 40.0 % (n=12/30) of the patients had doses outside of target range (1,250 μM·min +/− 20%), based on expected exposure using a fixed dose of 0.8 mg/kg. Specifically, infusion of the test dose resulted in 1,500 μM·min or higher AUC in 3.3% (n=1/30) and 1,000 μM·min or lower AUC in 36.7% (n=11/30) of patients. In order to achieve the target AUC, daily PK-directed dose of IV Bu when conditioning started on Day -5 ranged between 1.99 mg/kg and 4.73 mg/kg: lower than 3.2 mg/kg in 12 subjects and higher than 3.2 mg/kg in the remaining 18. Confirmatory PK on Day -5 demonstrated that mean Bu clearances were comparable to that from test PK: 3.03 ml/min/kg for test dose and 2.93 ml/min/kg for Day - 5. Consequently, using a test dose followed by PK-directed Bu dosing, 93.3% of patients (n=28/30) fell within the target range (AUC, 20,000 μM·min +/−20%). Only two patients (6.7%) needed subsequent daily dose adjustment on Day -3 and Day -2. No instances of VOD, seizure, or worsening neuropathy have been reported to date. One death was reported by Day 30 after transplant in a patient with Parkinsonism who died of pulmonary complications.

CONCLUSION:
This multicenter, prospective study reveals that a pre-transplant test dose PK allows accurate targeting of busulfan dosing. The conditioning regimen of bortezomib and IV busulfan with PK-directed dose optimization is well tolerated in patients with relapsed MM who undergo second autologous HSCT.

Disclosures:
Freytes: Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Busulfex and bortezomib as conditioning regimen for autologous transplant in patients with multiple myeloma. Yeh:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.: Research Funding. Shaughnessy:Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. White:Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rodriguez:Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Research Funding. Yu:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.: Research Funding. Sun:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.: Employment. Armstrong:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization, Inc.: Employment. Elekes:Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Employment. Kato:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.: Employment. Reece:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding.