Exploring Various Polygenic Risk Scores for Skin Cancer in the Phenomes of the Michigan Genomics Initiative and the UK Biobank with a Visual Catalog:PRSWeb
Authors: Fritsche Lars G. , Beesley Lauren J. , VandeHaar Peter , Peng Robert B. , Salvatore Maxwell , Zawistowski Matthew , Gagliano Sarah A. , Das Sayantan , LeFaive Jonathon , Kaleba Erin O. , Klumpner Thomas T. , Moser Stephanie E. , Blanc Victoria M. , Brummett Chad M. , Kheterpal Sachin , Abecasis Gonçalo R. , Gruber Stephen B. , Mukherjee Bhramar 
Published: August 2018

AbstractPolygenic risk scores (PRS) are designed to serve as a single summary measure, condensing information from a large number of genetic variants associated with a disease. They have been used for stratification and prediction of disease risk. The construction of a PRS often depends on the purpose of the study, the available data/summary estimates, and the underlying genetic architecture of a disease. In this paper, we consider several choices for constructing a PRS using summary data obtained from various publicly-available sources including the UK Biobank and evaluate their abilities to predict outcomes derived from electronic health records (EHR). Weexamine the three most common skin cancer subtypes in the USA: basal cellcarcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. The genetic risk profiles of subtypes may consist of both shared and unique elements and we construct PRS to understand the common versus distinct etiology. This study is conducted using data from 30,702 unrelated, genotyped patients of recent European descent from the Michigan Genomics Initiative (MGI), a longitudinal biorepository effort within Michigan Medicine. Using these PRS for various skin cancer subtypes, we conduct a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) within the MGI data to evaluate their association with secondary traits. PheWAS results are then replicated using population-based UK Biobank data. We develop an accompanying visual catalog calledPRSwebthat provides detailed PheWAS results and allows users to directly compare different PRS construction methods. The results of this study can provide guidance regarding PRS construction in future PRS-PheWAS studies using EHR data involving disease subtypes.Author summaryIn the study of genetically complex diseases, polygenic risk scores synthesize information from multiple genetic risk factors to provide insight into a patient’s risk of developing a disease based on his/her genetic profile. These risk scores can be explored in conjunction with health and disease information available in the electronic medical records. They may be associated with diseases that may be related to or precursors of the underlying disease of interest. Limited work is available guiding risk score construction when the goal is to identify associations across the medical phenome. In this paper, we compare different polygenic risk score construction methods in terms of their relationships with the medical phenome. We further propose methods for using these risk scores to decouple the shared and unique genetic profiles of related diseases and to explore related diseases’ shared and unique secondary associations. Leveraging and harnessing the rich data resources of the Michigan Genomics Initiative, a biorepository effort at Michigan Medicine, and the larger population-based UK Biobank study, we investigated the performance of genetic risk profiling methods for the three most common types of skin cancer: melanoma, basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.