Prognostic Value of Sequencing-Based Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Underwent Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
Authors: Takamatsu Hiroyuki , Murata Ryoichi , Zheng Jianbiao , Moorhead Martin , Takezako Naoki , Ito Shigeki , Miyamoto Toshihiro , Yokoyama Kenji , Matsue Kosei , Sato Tsutomu , Kurokawa Toshiro , Yagi Hideo , Terasaki Yasushi , Ohata Kinya , Yoshida Takashi , Faham Malek , Nakao Shinji 
Published: October 2019

Abstract
Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in conjunction with therapeutic drugs such as bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide can dramatically improve response rates and the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, most patients with MM are considered to be incurable, and relapse owing to minimal residual disease (MRD) is the main cause of death among these patients. Here we utilized a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach for MRD assessment, which offers at least 1 to 2 logs greater sensitivity (10-6) compared to allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR (ASO-PCR) and flow cytometry, respectively (Faham et al Blood 2012). Previous studies have shown that NGS-based MRD assessment 90 days post-ASCT has prognostic value (Martinez-Lopez et al Blood 2014). In this study, we compared the prognostic value of MRD assessment in autografts and bone marrow (BM) samples from MM patients in the ASCT setting.
Methods: One hundred and twenty-three Japanese patients with newly diagnosed MM who received various induction regimens prior to ASCT were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received ASCT and were followed between June 15, 2004 and April 25, 2015. All patients had achieved a partial response (PR) or better after ASCT. Analyzed samples included: (1) BM slides from 96 MM patients at diagnosis, (2) fresh/frozen BM cells from 27 MM patients at diagnosis, (3) autografts and/or (4) post-ASCT BM cells obtained at the time of best response based on serum and urine tests. IGH-based ASO-PCR was performed as described previously (Methods Mol Biol 2009). NGS-based MRD assessment was performed using the immunosequencing platform (Adaptive Biotechnologies, South San Francisco, CA) (Martinez-Lopez et al Blood 2014).
Results: We compared MRD results in 51 samples assessed by ASO-PCR and NGS. We observed a high correlation between NGS and ASO-PCR results at MRD levels of 10-5 or higher (r=0.86, P<0.0001). Twenty-seven samples were positive by NGS and negative by ASO-PCR, demonstrating the higher sensitivity of NGS (10-6 or higher) vs ASO-PCR (10-4-10-5). We evaluated the association of clinical outcome with post-ASCT BM MRD assessment. Patients who were MRD negative by NGS (defined as <10-6) in post-ASCT BM cases (N=21) showed a significantly better progression free survival (PFS) compared to MRD positive patients (N=31) (P =0.005) (Fig 1A). When restricting the analysis to the 39 patients in complete response (CR), patients who were MRD negative by NGS (N=20) showed a significantly better PFS than those that were MRD positive (N=19) (P =0.042). We also evaluated the association of clinical outcome with autograft MRD assessment. 53 patients received post-ASCT therapy using novel agents such as bortezomib/lenalidomide/thalidomide, and 45 patients did not. Among the 45 patients who did not receive post ASCT treatment, patients with NGS-based MRD negativity in the autograft (N=11) had a significantly better PFS (P=0.012) and tended to have a better OS (p=0.203) than those who were MRD positive (N=34), with prognosis clearly stratified by the quantitative level of MRD (Figs 1B, 1C). MRD assessment from the 53 patients who did receive post ASCT treatment tended to show a similar pattern. Finally, we studied whether clinical outcomes would have been altered by treatment in this cohort. Patients whose autografts were negative by NGS-based MRD assessment (N=19) had 100% PFS and OS at 5 years post ASCT irrespective of whether or not they received post ASCT treatment. Conversely, post ASCT treatment had a significant effect on the outcome of patients whose autografts were MRD positive by NGS. Specifically, the NGS-based MRD positive patients who received post ASCT treatment (N=45) had a significantly better PFS (P=0.003) and tended to have a better OS than those that were untreated (N=34) (Figs 1D, 1E).
Conclusions: In this study, we show the prognostic value of NGS-based MRD assessment in autografts of patients with MM. The NGS platform has improved sensitivity compared with ASO-qPCR in detecting MRD in autografts. Importantly, this retrospective study suggests that therapeutic intervention based on NGS-based MRD positivity has a significant effect on patient outcome in the post-ASCT setting.

Disclosures
Zheng: Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moorhead:Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Faham:Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp.: Employment, Other: Stockholder.