bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Phase I clinical trial on pomalidomide and dexamethasone in treating patients with relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) or primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL).
Authors: Tun Han W. , Johnston Patrick B. , Grommes Christian , Reeder Craig B. , Omuro Antonio Marcilio Padula , Menke David M , Copland John A. , DeAngelis Lisa Marie , Witzig Thomas E. 
Published: September 2018

7516 Background: PCNSL is a diffuse large B cell lymphoma confined to the CNS. Pomalidomide (POM) is a novel immunomodulatory agent with excellent CNS penetration (~40%) based on CNS PK analysis in rats and pre-clinical therapeutic activity against CNS lymphoma. Methods: A Phase I clinical trial was undertaken to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of POM, safety profile and overall response rate (ORR). Treatment consists of POM daily for 21 days every 28 days in combination with dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly for two cycles followed by POM alone in subsequent cycles until progression or intolerance. 4 dose escalation levels of POM (3mg, 5mg, 7mg, and 10 mg) were planned. Thromboprophylaxis with oral anticoagulant or aspirin was required. MTD determination has been completed and expansion of the MTD cohort is ongoing. Therapeutic responses were evaluated per the international PCNSL collaborative group (IPCG) criteria after 2 cycles of treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT01722305). Results: 21 of 25 patients accrued were eligible for assessment. The MTD was determined to be 5 mg qd for 21 days every 28 days. Two DLTs were seen at dose level 3 (Grade 3 dyspnea and grade 4 thrombocytopenia). One DLT was seen in the expanded MTD cohort (Grade 4 neutropenia and lymphocytopenia). ORR for the study (9/21) was 43% (95% CI- 22%, 66%) with 4 CR, 1 CRu and 4 PR. 3 responders completed 2, 4, and 6 cycles before progression. 6 responders have completed 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, and 32 cycles and remain on treatment. ORR for the MTD dose level was (5/12) 42% (95% CI- 15%, 72%) with 3 CR and 2 PR. 2 patients had stable disease (SD). Pseudo-progression was seen in 1 patient. Overall, grade 3/4 toxicity was hematologic (neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia) in 38.1% and non-hematologic in 33.3% (fatigue, pneumonia, sepsis, syncope, dyspnea, hypoxia, respiratory failure and maculo-papular rash). Percent CSF/blood ratio of POM was determined to be 19% in 1 patient. Conclusions: Pomalidomide treatment is feasible with therapeutic activity against relapsed/refractory PCNSL and should be further developed. Clinical trial information: NCT01722305.
Persistence of ibrutinib-associated hypertension in CLL pts treated in a real-world experience.
Authors: Gashonia Lisa M. , Carver Joseph R. , O'Quinn Rupal , Clasen Suparna , Hughes Mitchell E. , Schuster Stephen J. , Isaac Krista , Kennard Kaitlin , Svoboda Jakub , Daniel Catherine , Tsai Donald Edward , Fanning Molly J , Nasta Sunita , Landsburg Daniel Jeffrey , Nabhan Chadi , Mato Anthony R. 
Published: September 2018

7525 Background: Cardiovascular (CV) complications associated with ibrutinib (Ibr) include hypertension (HTN) and atrial fibrillation (AFIB) (incidence 26% and 9%, OBrien, ASH 2016). Unlike clinical trials, Ibr toxicities are the most common reasons for its discontinuation in clinical practice. The incidence of HTN in pts treated with Ibr outside of clinical trial setting and its impact on outcomes is unknown. Methods: Retrospective, cohort study of Ibr-treated CLL pts to estimate HTN incidence. Baseline CLL characteristics and co-morbidities were recorded. Blood pressure (BP) measurements were recorded prior to Ibr and sequentially following exposure at specific time points. CV meds were reviewed during a 12 mo follow-up period. The association between Ibr exposure and BP was tested. Results: 153 consecutive CLL pts treated with Ibr at a dose of 420 mg/day were identified. Med age was 57 yr (range: 34-87), relapsed CLL (69%), follow-up 14.5 mo. CV pre-Ibr characteristics included: smoking hx (49%), HTN (42%), hyperlipidemia (39%), diabetes (17%), CAD (12%), AFIB (6.8%). Proportion of pts on ≥1 anti-HTN med increased from 44% pre-Ibr (20% ≥ 2) to 57% during Ibr (30% ≥ 2). Med pre-Ibr BP was 127/70 mmHg (range 90-182/48-95mmHg). At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 mo, med BPs were 137/73, 141/75, 143/76, 140/75, 142/77 (7 mo to peak BP). There was a significant association between Ibr exposure and increased BP (p<.01). New HTN was observed in 40% of pts and 36% HTN pts had BP increased above baseline (med baseline 135/70 vs peak 161/80). Incidence of new AFIB was 8.1%. In UV analyses, predictive clinical factors for HTN were not identified. Pre-Ibr HTN (OR 3.0, p .05), CAD (OR 4.3, p .03), prior AFIB event (OR 10.8, p.001), hyperlipidemia (OR 3.4, p.05) were associated with post-Ibr AFIB. Conclusions: In the largest real-world series focused on BP in Ibr treated pts, we demonstrate a clear association between Ibr and HTN. Nearly 40% of pts developed HTN within 12 mo of Ibr exposure (vs. 26% in clinical trials over 5 yr). Despite aggressive management (multiple agents), Ibr associated HTN was persistent. These data underscore the critical need for monitoring and management strategies for HTN and follow-up data on future CV events.
Phase 1B of ibrutinib and high-dose methotrexate for recurrent/refractory CNS lymphoma.
Authors: Grommes Christian , Stone Jacqueline , Nolan Craig , Tsyvkin Elina , Wolfe Julia , Mellinghoff Ingo K. , DeAngelis Lisa Marie 
Published: September 2018

7533 Background: Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive primary brain tumor. Outcome and treatment options for patients with recurrent/refractory (r/r) disease are poor. We have observed promising efficacy of single agent ibrutinib in r/r PCNSL and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL). In this phase 1B trial, we investigate the toxicity of ibrutinib in combination with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in r/r PCNSL/SCNSL. Methods: Eligible patients had r/r PCNSL/SCNSL or newly diagnosed SCNSL, age≥18, ECOG≤2, normal end-organ function, and with any number and type of prior therapies. In patients with SCNSL disease, systemic disease needed to be absent. HD-MTX was given at 3.5g/m2 every 2 weeks for a total of 8 doses. To minimize adverse events, ibrutinib was stopped on days of HD-MTX infusion and was restarted 5 days after MTX infusion or after completion of MTX-clearance, if clearance of MTX required more than 5 days. Ibrutinib was continued daily after completion of 8 doses of MTX. Results: Six patients have been enrolled; 3 received 560mg and 3 received 840mg ibrutinib in combination with HD-MTX. Median age was 62 (range 43-74); median ECOG 1 (0:2; 1:3; 2:1). Two had r/r PCNSL and 4 SCNSL. Three had brain disease, one isolated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) involvement and two parenchymal and CSF involvement. Three patients had recurrent (2 PCNSL; 1 SCNSL), two refractory (both SCNSL), and one newly diagnosed disease (SCNSL). There were no grade 4 adverse events. Grade 3 events were observed in 5 patients (lymphopenia in 3, ALT elevation in 2, diarrhea in 1, electrolyte changes in 1, hypertension in 1). The most common adverse events were hypokalemia, low WBC, hyperglycemia, ALT and AST elevation. There was no dose reduction of methotrexate or ibrutinib in any patient. After a median follow-up of 130 days, all patients were evaluated for response after 4 doses of HD-MTX, with 4/6 (67%) showing a response: 2 CR, 2 PR, and 1 SD, 1 PD; both non-responders were refractory SCNSL. Ibrutinib concentrations were measured in plasma and CSF. Conclusions: Patients with CNS lymphoma tolerate the combination of HD-MTX and Ibrutinib (at 560 and 840mg) well. Continued enrollment into a combination arm that includes rituximab, methotrexate and ibrutinib is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02315326.
Oncogenic activation of STAT3 pathway drives PD-L1 expression in natural killer/T cell lymphoma.
Authors: Lim Soon Thye , Song Tammy , Lim Jing Quan , Laurensia Yurike , Pang Jane Wan Lu , Nagarajan Sanjanaa , Claresta Giovanni , Jing Tan , Tang Tiffany Pooi Ling , Nairismagi Maarja-Liisa , Ong Choon Kiat 
Published: September 2018

7549 Background: Natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTL) is a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that occurs more frequently in East Asia and Latin America and is associated with Epstein–Barr virus infection. Recent whole-exome sequencing studies in NKTL have reported recurrent somatic mutations in genes associated with JAK-STAT pathway, however the role of aberrant JAK-STAT signaling in tumor immune escape through PD-L1 regulation is unclear. Methods: To determine the prevalence of JAK-STAT pathway alteration in NKTL, we performed targeted sequencing of 188 genes associated with JAK-STAT pathway in 109 NKTL (22 Singapore cases, 79 China cases and 8 cell lines). Single nucleotide variants and micro-indels were called using Freebayes and candidate variants annotated using ANNOVAR. Ba/F3 model system was used to test the transformation capacity of identified variants. Cell lines were evaluated for PD-L1 expression by immunoblotting and flow cytometry. Tissue microarrays were examined for p-STAT3 and PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Results: We identified a total of 284 non-synonymous somatic mutations candidates in 114 genes, including 243 missense, 10 nonsense, 4 splice-site and 27 indel mutations. Recurrent mutations were most frequently located in STAT3 (25/109 cases, 23%) followed by TP53 (16/109 cases, 16%) and JAK3 (8/109 cases, 7%). A total of 18 STAT3 variants were identified including known hotspot mutations and novel mutations in the SH2, coiled coil and DNA-binding domains. Characterization of novel E616K mutant residing in the SH2 domain showed that E616K conferred IL3 independent growth to Ba/F3 cells, increased STAT3 phosphorylation and PD-L1 expression. Consistent with these findings, PD-L1 was over expressed in cell lines harboring STAT3 mutations. A positive correlation between PD-L1 and p-STAT3 expression was also observed in tumor tissue (R = 0.51, P = 0.02). Conclusions: We characterized a novel activating STAT3 mutant and demonstrated its ability to drive PD-L1 expression, which may promote tumor evasion from the antitumor immune response. The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies and STAT3 inhibitors might be a promising and novel therapeutic approach for NKTL in the future.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma in a heavily pretreated patient population.
Authors: Kobrinski Daniel Allen , Smith Scott E. , Al-Mansour Zeina , Tsai Stephanie Bochen , Martin Brendan , Stiff Patrick J. 
Published: September 2018

7558 Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the only potential curative treatment option for patients with MCL due to its potent graft-versus-lymphoma (GVL) effect. Survival following allo-SCT for MCL is variable due to high rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM). Methods: We retrospectively identified all patients who were treated with an allo-SCT for MCL at Loyola University Medical Center between January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2016. Probability estimates for overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 5 years were calculated from the date of allo-SCT to the date of patient death or last known follow-up. Significance was determined using a cox proportional hazard (CPH) model. Rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and relapse were also reported. Results: Patient characteristics (n = 29) are listed in Table. Median follow-up in surviving patients is 10 years (range 5-14 years). A majority of patients (n = 23, 79%) had 3 or more lines of treatment prior to allo-SCT. The 5 year rates of OS and NRM for all patients are 42% and 53%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed a lower risk of death in patients who received TBI-based conditioning (HR: 0.19, 95 CI: 0.04 – 0.81, p = 0.03), and those who had HLA-matched related donor (MRD) transplants (HR: 0.29, 95 CI: 0.11 – 0.79, p = 0.02). Patients who received more than 3 lines of prior treatment had a higher risk of death (HR: 2.77, 95% CI: 1.05-7.34, p = 0.04). Low rates of grade III/IV aGVHD (n = 4) and relapse (n = 4) occurred in our patient population. Two patient deaths were attributable to aGVHD, and the majority of other deaths were due to treatment-related toxicities. Conclusions: In an era of numerous effective non-curative salvage therapies, the optimal timing of allo-SCT for MCL needs further clarification. Our data supports early opposed to delayed allo-SCT for select high-risk patients with MCL who have a MRD. [Table: see text]
Replacement of ixazomib for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients refractory to a bortezomib or carfilzomib-containing combination therapy.
Authors: Berenson James R. , Cohen Alexa , Spektor Tanya M. , Bitran Jacob D. , Chen Gigi Qiqi , Moezi Mehdi M. , Bessudo Alberto , Ye Joseph Z. , Hager Steven Jeffrey , Moss Robert A. , Cartmell Alan D. , Coleman Teresa A. , Hrom John Stewart , Eshaghian Shahrooz , Maluso Tina , Swift Regina A. , Lim Stephen 
Published: September 2018

8013 Background: The proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib (Ixz) is the first orally administered PI approved for treating multiple myeloma (MM). It has shown clinical activity as a single agent and when used in other combinations. In this phase 1/2 trial, we evaluated Ixz as a replacement therapy for bortezomib or carfilzomib for MM patients who were refractory to a bortezomib- or carfilzomib-containing combination regimen. Methods: This was a phase 1/2, intra-patient, multicenter, open-label trial evaluating the replacement of ixazomib for bortezomib or carfilzomib for MM patients who were refractory in combination with the other agents that the patients had received and failed. Patients received Ixz on days 1, 8 and 15 on a 28-day schedule and the other drugs were administered using the same doses and schedules as they were receiving during their prior regimen. If the Ixz maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for a particular combination regimen was previously determined, then patients were enrolled directly into Phase 2 (PhII). If not, MTD was determined during the Phase 1 (PhI) portion of the trial. Results: To date, a total of 40 patients have been enrolled; 37 patients (21 were enrolled in PhI and 16 in PhII) had completed at least one cycle of this treatment. Patients received a median of 5 prior treatments (range, 1-22). The median follow-up time for all patients was 1.6 months (range, 0.1-10.7 months), whereas that of PhII was 2.2 months (range, 0.2-10.7 months). There was no clinical benefit (CBR; 0%) nor any overall response rate (ORR; 0%) for patients receiving Ixz 3 mg (PhI). Nine patients (43%) showed stable disease (SD) while 12 (57%) exhibited disease progression (PD). In PhII (4mg Ixz) portion of the trial, ORR and CBR were both 18.7% with 16 (43.2%) patients showing SD, and 18 (48.6%) patients displaying PD. Common ≥ Gr3 adverse events were anemia (11%), thrombocytopenia (5.4%), hyponatremia (5.4%), dehydration (5.4%) and neutropenia (2.7%). Conclusions: Replacement of bortezomib or carfilzomib with Ixz infrequently leads to responses among RRMM patient who have progressed while on proteasome inhibitor -containing combination regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT02206425.
Phase 3 ELOQUENT-2 study: Extended four year follow-up (FU) of elotuzumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ELd) vs Ld in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Authors: Lonial Sagar , Dimopoulos Meletios A. , Weisel Katja C. , White Darrell , Moreau Philippe , Mateos Maria-Victoria , San Miguel Jesus , Anderson Kenneth Carl , Shpilberg Ofer , Grosicki Sebastian , Spicka Ivan , Walter-Croneck Adam , Magen Hila , Belch Andrew , Reece Donna Ellen , Beksac Meral , Mekan Sabeen , Sy Oumar , Singhal Anil K. , Richardson Paul G. 
Published: September 2018

8028 Background: Elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody, has a dual mechanism of action: directly activating NK cells and tagging myeloma cells for recognition/death via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In a 3-y FU, ELOQUENT-2 (NCT01239797) showed a sustained 27% reduction in risk of disease progression/death for ELd vs Ld and OS trend in favor of ELd (Dimopoulos et al, ASH 2015). Here we present extended 4-y FU data (median FU 46 mo). Methods: RRMM patients (pts) were randomized 1:1 to ELd or Ld in 28-d cycles until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Coprimary endpoints: PFS, ORR. Secondary endpoint: OS. Results: Of 646 RRMM pts, 321 were randomized to ELd, 325 to Ld; ~ twice as many pts remain on therapy in ELd vs Ld (17 vs 9%) at data cut-off (Oct 18, 2016). Discontinuation was mainly due to disease progression (both arms 54%). At 4-y FU, ELd had 29% reduction in risk of progression/death vs Ld (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59–0.86) and relative improvement of 50% in PFS (21 vs 14%). Pts with ≥VGPR (ELd 112 [35%], Ld 95 [29%]) had greatest reduction in risk of progression/death (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46–0.94). ORR was 79% (ELd) vs 66% (Ld). OS will be presented. G3–4 AEs in ≥5% of pts included second primary malignancies (SPMs), vascular diseases, cardiac disorders and infections (ELd vs Ld: 9 vs 6%, 10 vs 8%, 5 vs 8%, 33 vs 26%). Overall rate (any grade) of infection and SPMs was 84 vs 75% and 17 vs 11% for ELd vs Ld. However, pts had longer exposure to ELd vs Ld (median [Q1, Q3] treatment cycles (19 [9, 42] vs 14 [6, 25]). There were fewer deaths with ELd vs Ld (165 vs 186), mainly due to disease progression and infection in both arms. Conclusions: Elotuzumab in combination with Ld consistently met its efficacy objectives at 4-y FU. ELd showed durable, clinically relevant improvement in PFS, with 29% reduction in risk of progression/death, consistent with 2-y (30%) and 3-y FU (27%). Safety, including rate of SPMs, was consistent with previous findings, with minimal incremental AEs with addition of elotuzumab to Ld. These data represent the longest median FU of an immuno-oncology agent in MM. Study funding: BMS. Writing support: C Tomas, Caudex, funded by BMS. Clinical trial information: NCT01239797.
Nivolumab (nivo) ± ipilimumab (ipi) in advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): First report of a randomized expansion cohort from CheckMate 032.
Authors: Hellmann Matthew David , Ott Patrick Alexander , Zugazagoitia Jon , Ready Neal E. , Hann Christine L. , De Braud Filippo G. , Antonia Scott Joseph , Ascierto Paolo Antonio , Moreno Victor , Atmaca Akin , Salvagni Stefania , Taylor Matthew H. , Amin Asim , Camidge D. Ross , Horn Leora , Calvo Emiliano , Cai Weiguo , Fairchild Justin P. , Callahan Margaret K. , Spigel David R. 
Published: September 2018

8503 Background: Patients (pts) with advanced SCLC after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (PLT-CT) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. CheckMate 032 is a phase I/II trial evaluating multiple regimens of nivo ± ipi in solid tumors, including advanced SCLC. Tolerability and efficacy of nivo ± ipi were demonstrated in early results from the initial treatment arms (Antonia, Lancet Oncol 2016), prompting long-term follow-up and the addition of a randomized expansion cohort to further evaluate nivo ± ipi in advanced SCLC. Methods: In the initial treatment arms, pts with advanced SCLC and disease progression after prior PLT-CT were assigned to nivo (3 mg/kg Q2W; n = 98) or nivo 1 + ipi 3 (1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg Q3W x 4, then nivo 3 Q2W; n = 61); safety/efficacy was assessed with a follow-up of ~18 mo. In the subsequent SCLC expansion cohort, pts were randomized 3:2 to nivo vs nivo 1 + ipi 3 and stratified by number of prior therapies. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: Updated efficacy/safety results from the initial (non-randomized) nivo and nivo 1 + ipi 3 arms are summarized in the table. Responses were durable and occurred regardless of PD-L1 expression or PLT-sensitivity; safety was consistent with prior nivo ± ipi studies. In the expansion cohort, 247 pts were randomized to nivo or nivo 1 + ipi 3. The presentation will contain the first report of efficacy/safety results and subgroup analyses from this randomized expansion cohort. Conclusions: Durable responses are observed with nivo and nivo + ipi in pts with previously treated SCLC. The expansion cohort represents the first randomized evaluation of combined immune checkpoint blockade in SCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT01928394. [Table: see text]
Outcomes of anti-PD-1 therapy in mesothelioma and correlation with PD-L1 expression.
Authors: Rivalland Gareth , Kao Steven Chuan-Hao , Pavlakis Nick , Hughes Brett Gordon Maxwell , Thapa Bibhusal , Pal Abhijit , Walkiewicz Marzena , Zimet Allan Solomon , White Shane , O'Byrne Ken , Mitchell Paul , John Thomas 
Published: September 2018

8514 Background: Early phase trials of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies have demonstrated important responses in malignant mesothelioma (MM). Expression of the ligand, PD-L1, is a potential biomarker for PD-1 directed therapy use and is expressed in a significant proportion of MM. We present results for a cohort treated with PD-1 inhibitory antibodies and assessed for PD-L1 expression. Methods: Patients (pts) with unresectable pleural or peritoneal mm treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies were included. Data was collected retrospectively. Radiological response was assessed using RECIST 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. PD-L1 expression was assessed with IHC clone E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technology). PD-L1 positivity was defined as membranous expression on tumour cells: > 5% for PD-L1+ and > 50% for PD-L1hi. Results: Forty-six pts were treated between July 2015 and January 2017. Median age was 66.5 years, ECOG PS was 0/1 in 3/46 (7%) and 35/46 (76%) respectively. Most were male (83%), and 43/46 (93%) had ≥1 prior therapy, with a median of 2 (range 0 - 5). The predominant histology was epithelioid (n = 32/46; 70%). Pembrolizumab was used in 45/46 and BGB-A317 (a PD-L1 antibody) in 1 pt. Of the 46 pts, the overall response rate (ORR) was 15% (7 PR) with 15/46 (33%) achieving stable disease, giving a DCR of 44%. Progression was seen in 24/46 (52%). Median OS for the entire cohort was 8.0 months (95% CI: 2.3 – 11.9). Median duration of response was not yet reached (range 1.5 -19.8). PD-L1 testing was performed in 14 samples, with PD-L1+ in 5 (36%) and PD-L1hi in 4 (29%). The ORR was 40% (2 PR, 3 SD) with PD-L1+, 50% (2 PR, 2 SD) with PD-L1hi and 22% (2/9 patients) with negative expression. PFS and OS were greater with both PD-L1+ (PFS HR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.05 – 1.32, p = 0.10) and PD-L1hi(PFS HR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.02 – 1.47, p = 0.11). PD-L1+ positivity remained a borderline predictor of improved survival on multivariate analysis (p = 0.06). Complete PD-L1 analysis will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: PD-1 targeted therapy demonstrated a clinically significant response rate in this cohort of mm patients. Initial analysis suggests PD-L1 expression is correlated with improved response and survival.