CYBOR-D Induction Therapy In Clinical Practice
Authors: Chen Christine , Masih-Khan Esther , Jimenez-Zepeda Victor , Reece Donna E. , Trudel Suzanne , Tiedemann Rodger E. , Kukreti Vishal 
Published: October 2019

Abstract
Abstract 5136

Introduction:
CyBorD is a highly active three-drug induction regimen for multiple myeloma (MM) patients preparing for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). In initial phase 2 testing, CyBorD (bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1,4,8,11, weekly cyclophosphamide 300mg/m2 orally days 1,8,15,22, and dexamethasone 40mg orally days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20, given for four 28-day cycles) achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 88% (≥VGPR 61%)(Reeder et al. Leukemia 2009). In an expanded cohort (30 patients) of the original phase 2 trial, a modified dosing schedule using a higher bortezomib dose of 1.5mg/m2 but given only weekly (days 1,8,15,22) and DEX 40mg dropped to once weekly (days 1,8,15,22) for cycles 3 and 4, demonstrated similar responses to the twice weekly cohort (ORR 93%, ≥VGPR 60%) with less toxicity (Reeder et al. Blood 2010). Based on these promising study results, our institution adopted the weekly CyBorD regimen as our standard induction regimen. Given that clinical trial efficacy can significantly overestimate real-life effectiveness of a treatment regimen, we reviewed our institutional clinical practice with CyBorD in a non-clinical trial setting.

Methods:
As a referral transplant center, Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) performs over 100 ASCTs per year, but most patients receive their induction therapy at community institutions. From April 2007-July 2010, 55 MM patients who received CyBorD induction therapy at our institution were reviewed. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and details of induction therapy and ASCT were obtained from retrospective chart and transplant database review. Statistical analyses of survival outcomes were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. To obtain additional CyBorD experience from community institutions, an on-line survey of referring physicians was performed.

Results:
Fifty-five MM patients receiving weekly CyBorD induction in preparation for ASCT were reviewed. Median age was 58 years (range 36–71); 32 male (58%); 6 patients with high-risk FISH cytogenetics [3 with t(4;14), 3 with del17p]. MM subtypes included: IgG 40%, IgA 16%, light chains only 33%, and other 11%. A median of 4 cycles of CyBorD (range 1–10) were administered. Response rates after induction, before ASCT, were comparable to phase 2 data with an overall response of 91% (3VGPR 65%). Although responses were rapid in onset, the median number of cycles required to achieve best response was 4 (range 1–10). Dose delays or reductions of any agents were required in 10 patients (18%): 5.4% of cyclophophosphamide, 11% bortezomib, 9% dexamethasone. Grade 3–4 toxicities were reported in 13 patients (24%). Grade 3–4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia were uncommon (7 and 2%, respectively) and no grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy was seen. The median number of stem cells collected was 10.3 × 106/kg over a median of one day (range 1–5) of leukapheresis. All patients, except 4, proceeded to ASCT after CyBorD induction with a median PFS 21 months, OS not reached, at a median follow-up 31.5 mos. On-line survey responses were obtained from 20 physicians at 11 referring institutions describing their experience with CyBorD. Induction regimens used by the surveyed sites included: CyBorD 90%, biweekly bortezomib plus dexamethasone 35%, high-dose dexamethasone alone 10%, and other 5%. Weekly CyBorD was ranked highly for convenience, ease of administration and patient tolerance, but restricted bortezomib drug access was cited as the main cause for delay in initiating therapy.

Conclusions:
Weekly CyBorD as induction therapy prior to ASCT is highly effective in the non-clinical trial setting, with similar response and toxicity profiles to phase 2 trial data. CyBorD does not appear to impair stem cell mobilization. Given its high activity and excellent toxicity profile, CyBorD has been adopted widely in our community referral base and remains our institutional induction standard.

Disclosures:
Chen: Ortho: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jimenez-Zepeda:Ortho: Honoraria. Reece:Bristol, Meyers, Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson&Johnson: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Trudel:Ortho: Honoraria. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.