The role of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in the recovery of right ventricular function and right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling in convalescent COVID-19 patients
Authors: Gounaridi M I , Vontetsianos A , Chynkiamis N , Theofilis P , Anastasiou A , Tzima I , Zakynthinos G , Gialamas I , Goliopoulou A , Kalogeras K , Vavouranakis M , Koulouris N , Oikonomou E , Siasos G 
Published: October 2024

Abstract

Introduction
Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is predominantly a respiratory disease, but simultaneous cardiovascular impairment has been documented, even in the post-acute phase. Subclinical right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is often described and mainly attributed to parenchymal lung damage (ARDS) or pulmonary vascular complications such as pulmonary embolism. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation programs play an integral part in the long-term management of chronic cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases and lately have been proven useful in managing post-COVID-19 sequelae.

Purpose
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a post-COVID-19 rehabilitation program in the recovery of right ventricular function and right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling in convalescent COVID-19 patients.

Methods
40 convalescent COVID-19 patients were evaluated one and three months after the acute phase of the disease. 30 subjects participated in a 3-month cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program (study group) and 10 did not (control group). Right ventricular function echocardiographic parameters (right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP)) were evaluated and right ventricular-arterial coupling (RVAC) was estimated via the RVGLS/PASP ratio.

Results
A total of 40 patients were included in this study, of whom 30 underwent cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. There were no major differences in the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors between the two groups. When examining right ventricular parameters at baseline, RVGLS (Rehabilitation: -23.1 (4.1) % vs. No rehabilitation: -23.0 (4.7) %, p=0.94) and PASP (Rehabilitation: 28 (6) mmHg vs. No rehabilitation: 25 (4) mmHg, p=0.08) did not differ statistically between the two groups. RVAC was also similar at baseline (Rehabilitation: -0.96 (0.28) %/mmHg vs. No rehabilitation: -0.86 (0.27) %/mmHg, p=0.30). At follow-up, patients who underwent cardiopulmonary rehabilitation exhibited a significant improvement in RVGLS (from Τ0: -23.1 (4.2) % to T1: -24.3 (4) %, p&lt;0.001), PASP (from T0: 28 (6) mmHg to T1: 27 (5) mmHg, p=0.016), and RVAC (from T0: -0.86 (0.27) %/mmHg to T1: -0.93 (0.26) %/mmHg, p&lt;0.001). In the no rehabilitation group, RVGLS (from T0: -23.0 (4.7) % to T1: -23.2 (4.4) %, p=0.19), PASP (from T0: 25 (4) mmHg to T1: 25 (4) mmHg, p=0.17), and RVAC (from T0: -0.96 (0.28) %/mmHg to T1: -0.96 (0.27) %/mmHg, p=0.60) were not significantly altered at follow-up. We detected a statistically significant interaction of intervention with RVGLS (p=0.024) and RVAC (p=0.012) (Figure 1).

Conclusion
Subclinical right ventricular dysfunction is present in convalescent COVID-19 patients. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation can accelerate the improvement of RVAC by mediating both the RV afterload reduction (PASP) and improving RV function.Figure 1