Challenging endomyocardial biopsies' gold standard status in rejection screening: a prospective blinded study on cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart transplant patients
Authors: Taipale M , Pentikainen M , Martelius L , Mutka A , Kytola S , Kankainen M , Peltonen J I , Syrjala S , Lahtiharju A , Lommi J , Jahnukainen T , Kivisto S , Lemstrom K , Ojala T 
Published: October 2024

Abstract

Background
The detection of rejection is crucial for graft survival after heart transplantation. Endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) serve as the gold standard for rejection surveillance despite its limitations, while cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), in conjunction with donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) analysis, holds promise as a non-invasive approach.

Purpose
In this prospective blinded study, our aim was to evaluate feasibility of CMR for rejection screening, validating it against EMB, dd-cfDNA, and clinical status.

Methods
We blindly analyzed 250 studies involving CMR, EMB, dd-cfDNA, and clinical data in 58 heart transplant recipients (17 children and 41 adults). Of these 250 studies, 239 (96%) were assessed within 1 to 28 months after transplantation, and 11 studies (4%) 3-14 years post-transplant. In CMR T1- and T2-mapping analyses, acute rejection was defined by T1 or T2 times exceeding the specified thresholds (T1 ≥ 1060 ms, T2 ≥ 55 ms) in at least 2/16 heart segments. EMB findings were graded according to the ISHLT criteria (2005 and 2013), and acute cellular rejection (ACR) grade ≥ 2 or antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) grade ≥ 1 were considered significant. The cutoff for abnormal dd-cfDNA was set at 0.2%. Solely clinical rejection included patients with absent or normal EMB (ACR grade 0-1 and AMR grade 0), but with symptoms or ECG/echocardiographic findings indicative of acute rejection.

Results
Our study revealed 22 acute rejections, with 15 confirmed through EMB and 7 diagnosed solely based on clinical indicators. Among the EMB-confirmed cases, 3/15 exhibited AMR grade 1, 10/15 demonstrated ACR grade 2 and 2/15 ACR grade 3. CMR identified rejection in 77% (17/22) of cases. Specifically, it successfully identified rejection in 67% (10/15) of EMB-confirmed cases and 100% (7/7) of solely clinically diagnosed cases. Examining the concordance between CMR findings and dd-cfDNA levels, 35% (6/17) of the CMR-identified rejection cases exhibited abnormal dd-cfDNA, while 30% (5/17) showed normal levels. Notably, in one case, despite normal CMR results, both EMB and dd-cfDNA indicated rejection. Conversely, in four instances where EMB indicated acute rejection, both CMR and dd-cfDNA levels were normal.
These findings highlight a potential discrepancy in the diagnostic accuracy of EMB, suggesting its tendency to both over- and underdiagnose acute heart transplant rejection. The integration of CMR and dd-cfDNA in the diagnostic process may provide a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of rejection episodes, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making in heart transplant recipients.

Conclusions
EMB presents challenges in both under- and overdiagnosing rejection in heart transplant surveillance. A strategy based on CMR, combined with dd-cfDNA analyses, shows promise as a new gold standard for rejection screening.Flowchart