Comparative characteristics and invasive management in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in two high-volume hospitals from Romania and Germany
Authors: Cotoban A G , Mahabadi A A , Rassaf T , Al-Rashid F , Vinereanu D 
Published: October 2024

Abstract

Introduction
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) carries the highest mortality burden across Europe, acute coronary syndromes (ACS) being responsible for most CVD-related deaths. However, significant regional differences in ACS management have been reported.

Purpose
To describe the characteristics and management of patients with higher-risk non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) in 2 high-volume hospitals from 2 European countries with different prevalence of CVD and different income (Germany – GER and Romania – RO).

Methods
All consecutive invasively managed high and very-high risk NSTE-ACS patients admitted in 2022 in two high-volume hospitals from GER and RO were identified. Patient clinical profiles, coronary anatomy, revascularization strategies, and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Results were adjusted for age and gender.

Results
707 patients (345 GER, 66.7% male; 362 RO, 71.5% male; p&gt;0.05) were included. RO patients were younger (65.5 vs. 70.1 years), with higher rates of hypertension (88.7% vs. 82.0%), dyslipidemia (95.6% vs. 81.7%), diabetes (46.1% vs. 34.5%), and active smoking (37.3% vs. 23.5%) (all p&lt;0.05); whereas GER patients had higher rates of atrial fibrillation (36.2% vs. 23.2%), chronic respiratory disease (24.6% vs. 10.5%), sleep apnoea (9.0% vs. 1.4%), thyroid disorders (24.1% vs. 6.4%), and prior revascularization by percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) (36.5% vs. 20.2%) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (15.7% vs. 3.0%) (all p&lt;0.05). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower in the RO cohort (43.4% vs. 48%, p&lt;0.001). Rates of myocardial infarction diagnosed by high-sensitivity troponin I assays (88.7% GER, 87.6% RO), and median diagnosis-to-cathlab intervals (12.8 hours GER, 15.5 hours RO) were similar (all p&gt;0.05). In the obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) group (80.3% GER, 84.3% RO), no differences were found in multivessel disease rates (67.1% GER, 69.8% RO) or mean SYNTAX score (18.6 GER, 16.9 RO) (all p&gt;0.05). For type 1 NSTE-ACS (67% GER vs. 79% RO, p&lt;0.001), PCI represented the main revascularization method (88.3% GER vs. 78.3% RO, p&lt;0.05). Excluding patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI, complete revascularization (residual SYNTAX score ≤8), was reported in 77.1% GER and 84.4% RO of the PCI cases (p&gt;0.05). Intravascular imaging was used in 28.4% of PCIs in GER, and in none in RO. In-hospital mortality (7.0% GER, 6.8% RO), and rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (8.1% GER, 9.1% RO), were similar (all p&gt;0.05).

Conclusions
Higher-risk NSTE-ACS patient profiles mirror overall country CVD risk patterns. Compared to Germany, patients in Romania are younger, with a higher CVD risk factor burden, lower LVEF, underdiagnosis of major non-CVD comorbidities, and delayed CAD diagnosis. Despite similar guideline-directed management and in-hospital outcomes in both centres, these aspects may influence the long-term prognosis.