bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A multi-center phase Ib/II study of nal-irinotecan, 5-fluouracil and leucovorin in combination with nivolumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced unresectable biliary tract cancer.
Authors: Sahai Vaibhav , Buckley Tyler Howard , Griffith Kent A. , Zalupski Mark 
Published: May 2019

TPS4154 Background: Patients (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) have poor prognosis despite systemic chemotherapy, and treatment beyond first-line platinum doublet remains investigational. The immunomodulatory properties of conventional cytotoxic therapy, particularly in regard to the upregulation of PD-L1 expression rendering tumor cells more sensitive to T cell-mediated lysis and neoantigen production, rapid emergence of chemotherapy resistance, and known modest efficacy of single agent PD-1 antibody in BTC provide a rationale for combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This multi-center, phase Ib/II, single-arm study is designed to investigate the role of nal-irinotecan, 5-FU and leucovorin in combination with nivolumab as second-line therapy in pts with advanced BTC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed advanced, unresectable biliary carcinoma (intra- or extra-hepatic and gallbladder) with progression or intolerance of first-line systemic therapy (excluding irinotecan and PD-1/PD-L1 antibody), measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS 0-1, Child Pugh A or B7, and absence of autoimmune disease or chronic steroid use. Primary objective of the phase Ib portion is to determine the recommended phase 2 dose, and of the phase II portion is to evaluate the median progression-free survival. Secondary objectives include evaluation of objective response rate per immune related (ir)RECIST, median OS and safety in this patient population. Exploratory objectives include identification of biomarker predictors of response and mechanisms of resistance through serial biopsies and blood collection (pre, on and post therapy), including sequential whole exome/transcriptomic analysis and immune cell subset analysis (tissue and blood). Therapy includes nal-irinotecan 70 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 (dose level -1) or 400 mg/m2 (dose level 0), 5-fluouracil 2400 mg/m2 IV over 46 hours, and nivolumab 240 mg on day 1 every 2 weeks for 6 months. In the absence of disease progression, pts may continue therapy for up to 2 years. Accrual goal is 30 evaluable pts. Using a null hypothesis value of median PFS of 2.9 months, and an alternative hypothesis of 5.0 months, this ongoing study has > 80% power, with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 to identify treatment efficacy of study arm. Clinical trial information: NCT03785873.
Infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: The PROOF trial.
Authors: Javle Milind M. , Borbath Ivan , Clarke Stephen John , Hitre Erika , Louvet Christophe , Mercade Teresa Macarulla , Oh Do-Youn , Spratlin Jennifer L. , Valle Juan W. , Weiss Karl Heinz , Berman Craig , Howland Michael , Ye Yining , Cho Terry , Moran Susan , Abou-Alfa Ghassan K. 
Published: May 2019

TPS4155 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma is the most common biliary tract malignancy with approximately 5,000–10,000 new cases annually in the USA. The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family plays an important role in cholangiocarcinoma, with FGFR2 gene fusions detected in about 15% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Infigratinib is an ATP-competitive, FGFR1–3-selective oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor. First-line treatment with chemotherapy offers only modest benefit and more effective treatment options are needed. Based on preliminary response data of infigratinib in relapsed/refractory cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions/translocations (Phase 2 Study CBJG398X2204), the PROOF trial is evaluating infigratinib versus gemcitabine + cisplatin in front-line patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations. Methods: Patients with advanced/metastatic or inoperable cholangiocarcinoma are randomized 1:1 to oral infigratinib once daily for 21 days of a 28-day treatment cycle versus IV gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) + cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Treatment will continue until confirmed progressive disease by central review, intolerance, withdrawal of informed consent, or death. After 8 cycles of gemcitabine + cisplatin, patients can continue treatment if the investigator considers that they are deriving continued benefit. Patients on the gemcitabine + cisplatin arm who progress can cross-over to infigratinib. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS, per RECIST v1.1 central review). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, PFS (investigator determined), overall response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and safety. Quality of life, PK and exploratory genetic alterations/biomarkers will also be measured. Current status: The study was initiated in February 2019 with planned enrollment of 350 patients with confirmed FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations. Clinical trial information: NCT03773302.
A randomized noncomparative phase II study of maintenance therapy with multiepitope vaccine Tedopi (OSE2101) ± nivolumab or FOLFIRI after induction chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFIRINOX in patients (Pts) with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) (TEDOPaM–PRODIGE 63 GERCOR D17-01 study).
Authors: Neuzillet Cindy , Hautefeuille Vincent , Lambert Aurélien , Garcia-Larnicol Marie-Line , Vernerey Dewi 
Published: May 2019

TPS4160 Background: FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5FU], folinic acid [FA], irinotecan [Iri], and oxaliplatin [Ox]) is a standard 1st-line treatment in fit Pts with aPDAC. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 as single agents have failed in PDAC so far and new combination immunotherapies are needed. Tedopi (OSE2101) is a multiple neoepitope vaccine restricted to HLA-A2 positive Pts, targeting 5 tumor-associated antigens (CEA, HER2, MAGE2, MAGE3, TP53) that are frequently expressed in PDAC. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Tedopi alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 nivolumab, or FOLFIRI as maintenance therapy in Pts with aPDAC after FOLFIRINOX induction CT. Methods: TEDOPaM - PRODIGE 63 is a 3-arm, Fleming 2-stage, open-label, randomized, non-comparative phase II study. 156 Pts with locally advanced or metastatic, pathologically proven PDAC; ECOG performance status 0-1; HLA-A2 genotype; controlled disease (objective response or stable disease) after 8 cycles of (modified) FOLFIRINOX; and adequate organ functions, are randomized (1:1:1, stratified on center, tumor stage, and best response to FOLFIRINOX) into 3 arms: Clinical trial information: NCT03806309. In Arms B and C, FOLFIRI is reintroduced at disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint: overall survival rate at M12. Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (CT-scan Q8W), duration of disease control, safety, objective response rate, RECIST v1.1/iRECIST comparison, HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30), Q-TWiST. An interim analysis is planned after inclusion of 20 Pts in each arm. Translational research will be performed on tumor tissue (initial FFPE biopsy and optional re-biopsy at inclusion): RNAseq (cancer and stroma), mutation burden, MMR status, immune infiltrates; and in blood (before and on-treatment): cytokine panel, PBMC phenotyping, vaccine-antigen specific T-cells, TCR repertoire, and extracellular vesicles, to explore biomarkers and pharmacodynamics effects of Tedopi ± nivolumab. Enrollment (12th Feb 2019): 1. ClinicalTrials Registration: NCT03806309.[Table: see text]
Adaptive Dose Escalation Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in combination with GC4419 in pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Holmlund Jon , Brookes Melissa , Colbert Lauren Elizabeth , Moningi Shalini , Bhutani Manoop S. , Katz Matthew H. G. , Varadhachary Gauri Rajani , Thall Peter F. , Herman Joseph M. , Taniguchi Cullen M. 
Published: May 2019

TPS4164 Background: Local progression causes up to 30% of deaths from pancreatic cancer (PC) and is also a significant source of morbidity. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers the potential for improved therapeutic index over standard fractionation, but current regimens of 5-7 Gy/fraction x 5 are constrained by nearby organ tolerance and offer only palliation without improving survival. Safe dose escalation is necessary to improve SBRT efficacy. GC4419, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, selectively converts superoxide (O2•-) to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and oxygen. O2•-initiates normal tissue damage due to RT. GC4419 is in a Phase 3 trial (NCT03689712) to reduce RT-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer, based on positive results in a randomized Phase 2 trial for that indication (Anderson, ASCO 2018). GC4419 improved the survival of mice receiving 8.5 Gy x 5 to the upper abdomen. Cancer cells are less tolerant to elevated H2O2, and more tolerant to elevated O2•-, than normal cells, and GC4419 demonstrated mechanism-dependent synergy with high dose-fraction RT in a human tumor xenograft with inducible expression of catalase (Sishc, AACR 2018). Thus, adding GC4419 to SBRT may increase both the efficacy and the safety of the latter. Methods: 48 patients with localized, unresectable PC without frank duodenal invasion, who have received 3+ cycles of induction chemotherapy, are to be randomized 1:1 to placebo or GC4419, 90 mg IV, prior to each of 5 consecutive daily (M-F) SBRT fractions. A phase I/II Late Onset Efficacy/ Toxicity tradeoff (LO-ET) based adaptive design adaptive model drives SBRT dose escalation in each arm based on a dual endpoint (Gr 3-4 GI toxicity or death ;stable disease or better) by 90 days post SBRT. The planned dose levels are 10, 11 and 12Gy x 5 fractions (BED10=100,112.5 and 132Gy, respectively) as an integrated boost to the gross tumor volume (GTV). Primary endpoint: Maximum tolerated dose of SBRT with GC4419 or placebo. Exploratory endpoints include change in tumor radiographic resectability, correlative studies (ctDNA, exosomal DNA, tumor exome/transcriptome sequencing, immune profiling). Supported by Galera Therapeutics, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03340974.
A randomized, phase II clinical trial of preoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for resectable, borderline-resectable, or locally advanced type a pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Hall William Adrian , Tsai Susan , Banerjee Anjishnu , George Ben , Ritch Paul S. , Thomas James P. , Paulson Eric , Christians Kathleen K. , Clarke Callisia , Dua Kulwinder , Khan Abdul H , Knechtges Paul , Hagen Catherine E , Evans Douglas B. , Erickson Beth 
Published: May 2019

TPS4167 Background: There is growing consensus for the use of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with potentially operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC). However, there is not consensus on the type and duration of chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) dose. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has gained popularity despite the absence of prospective data for its use in the preoperative setting. Furthermore, SBRT preoperatively has not been standardized. At present, there exists no randomized data comparing preoperative SBRT with conventionally fractionated concurrent chemo-RT. We designed this trial to examine differences between pre-op RT dose and fractionation schedules. Methods: This study is a prospective, randomized, two-arm, phase II clinical trial. Eligible patients must have cytologically confirmed PC and be deemed suitable for surgical resection with resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced type A disease, based on cross-sectional imaging. Before randomization patients are stratified by clinical node positivity, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and stage of disease. Patients are then randomized to either 50.4 Gy over 28 fractions with concurrent weekly Gemcitabine vs SBRT to a total dose of 25-35 Gy over 5 fractions. The primary endpoint of the study is pathologic node positivity. We hypothesize that patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conventionally fractionated chemo-RT will have a lower rate of pathologic node positivity as compared to those patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by SBRT. Secondary endpoints include patient reported quality of life, local recurrence, primary tumor pathologic response, margin status, surgical complications, MR based treatment response, and overall survival. We anticipate a node positivity rate of 37% when using preoperative chemotherapy followed by SBRT. We hypothesize that treatment with chemotherapy followed by conventionally fractionated chemo-RT will reduce the rate of node positivity to 17%. Using a one-sided Type I error rate of 0.1, approximately 88 total patients (44 per arm) provide an 80% power to detect the hypothesized difference in pathologic node positivity between the two arms. To address patient dropout, an additional 14 patients (about 15%) will be enrolled for a total target accrual of 102 patients. The trial opened in November 2018 and 8 of the planned 102 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03704662.
Niraparib in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous chemotherapy (NIRA-PANC): A phase 2 trial.
Authors: Kasi Anup , Chalise Prabhakar , Williamson Stephen K. , Baranda Joaquina Celebre , Sun Weijing , Al-Rajabi Raed Moh'd Taiseer , Saeed Anwaar , Kumer Sean , Schmitt Timothy , Foster Carolyn , Pessetto Ziyan Y. , Witek Malgorzata A. , Soper Steven A. , Godwin Andrew K. 
Published: May 2019

TPS4168 Background: Attempts to improve therapy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with traditional chemotherapy have largely failed to meaningfully improve survival. Therefore, there is a critical need for identification of specific molecular changes that define prognosis and potentially guide therapy decisions. Defective DNA damage response pathways in pancreatic cancer represent a targeted opportunity for treatment. PARP inhibitors exert activity in tumor cells that may not be effectively able to repair initially single-stranded and cumulatively double-stranded DNA breaks and can have a heightened susceptibility in tumor cells over normal tissue. This concept is referred to as synthetic lethality. Niraparib is an orally available, potent, highly selective PARP-1 and -2 inhibitor. We are studying the efficacy of Niraparib in pancreatic cancer patients that harbor DNA repair defects. Methods: This study is funded by a research grant from TESARO. Pre-screening of patients to find biomarker positive patients is funded by KU Cancer Center. This is a phase II open label single arm trial in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with germline or somatic mutations, either already known, or tested after consent to pre-screening tumor tissue analysis in BRCA1/2, PALB2, ATM, NBN, ATR, BRIP1, IDH1/2, RAD51, RAD51B/C/D, RAD54L, CDK12, BARD1, FAM175A, BAP1, CHEK1/2, GEN1, MRE11A, XRCC2, SHFM1, FANCD2, FANCA, FANCC, FANCG, RPA1, ARID1A. Patients are being treated with Niraparib 300mg or 200mg by mouth daily for 28 days (1 cycle = 28 days) (200mg dose is for participants whose baseline weight is < 77 kg [169.756 lbs] or baseline platelet count is < 150,000 µL). The primary objective is to assess antitumor efficacy of niraparib using Objective Response Rate per RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives include PFS, OS, DCR, DOR, and safety. Eligible patients received > 1 line of therapy, no prior PARP inhibitor(s), have measurable disease, and ECOG PS 0-1. Accrual target enrollment of 18 patients over a period of 24 months with a study duration of 30 months. Correlative studies include assessment of pharmacokinetics, circulating tumor cells and storing samples for future research. The trial is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT03553004.
A phase 3 randomized study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone or in combination with nivolumab (NIVO) ± BMS-986205 in cisplatin-eligible muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Authors: Sonpavde Guru , Necchi Andrea , Gupta Shilpa , Steinberg Gary D. , Gschwend Juergen E. , Van Der Heijden Michiel Simon , Garzon Nathalie , Elegbe Ayanbola , Raybold Bradley , Liaw Danny , Rutstein Mark , Galsky Matt D. 
Published: May 2019

TPS4587 Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) therapies have revolutionized the treatment (tx) of pts with advanced bladder cancer (advBC). For pts with cisplatin-eligible MIBC, the recommended tx regimen is cisplatin-based NAC prior to radical cystectomy (RC). However, since only ≈ 30% of pts achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) translating to improved long-term outcomes with approved regimens, new therapies are needed. PD-L1 expression is associated with aggressive BC and has been shown to increase in BC after NAC, suggesting that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is a valid therapeutic target. Additionally, expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is higher in BC than in normal bladder tissue and is associated with advanced disease and poor clinical outcome. BMS-986205, a selective, potent, once-daily oral IDO1 inhibitor that works early in the IDO1 pathway to reduce kynurenine production, has demonstrated clinical activity in combination with NIVO (anti–PD-1) in pts with IO tx–naive advBC who had ≥ 1 prior line of therapy (ORR, 37%). Taken together, these data provide a rationale for investigating NAC + NIVO + BMS-986205 in MIBC. Here we describe a randomized, partially blinded, phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of NAC ± NIVO ± BMS-986205 followed by RC and continued IO tx in pts with MIBC (NCT03661320). Methods: Pts aged ≥ 18 years with previously untreated MIBC (clinical stage T2-T4a, N0, M0), creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min, and predominant UC histology who are eligible for cisplatin-based NAC and RC will be enrolled. Pts with evidence of positive lymph node; metastatic BC; or prior systemic therapy, radiotherapy, or surgery for BC other than TURBT are not eligible. Pts will be randomized to receive NAC (gemcitabine/cisplatin; arm A), NAC + NIVO + oral placebo (arm B), or NAC + NIVO + BMS-986205 (arm C) followed by RC (all arms); arms B and C will receive continued IO tx. Primary endpoints include pCR after neoadjuvant tx and event-free survival (arms C vs A; arms B vs A). Secondary endpoints are overall survival and safety. This global study in 28 countries began accrual in Nov 2018 and has a target enrollment of 1200 pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03661320.
ALBAN: An open label, randomized, phase III trial, evaluating efficacy of atezolizumab in addition to one year BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guerin) bladder instillation in BCG-naive patients with high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (AFU-GETUG 37).
Authors: Roupret Morgan , Neuzillet Yann , Bertaut Aurelie , Pignot Geraldine , Houede Nadine , Champiat Stephane , Nénan-Le Ficher Soazig , Chausson Maggy , Loriot Yohann 
Published: May 2019

TPS4589 Background: The majority of patients with bladder cancer are diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Trans-urethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy is the standard of care for most patients with high-risk NMIBC, although clinical outcomes remain poor. Data from preclinical and clinical studies suggest that programmed death-ligand 1 PD-L1 inhibition may enhance antitumor activity of BCG therapy. Atezolizumab, an anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, is approved in the United States and the European Union as monotherapy when patients are ineligible for cisplatin or after prior platinum therapy. This approval was based on the results from phase II and III IMvigor210/211 trials. We have designed ALBAN, a phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab given in combination with BCG versus BCG alone in patients with high-risk NMIBC. Methods: In 30 centers in France, ALBAN (NCT03799835) is enrolling patients with histologically documented NMIBC who have not received prior BCG therapy. Eligible patients have to have high-risk features (T1 staging, high grade, or in situ carcinoma), ECOG PS 0-2, and a tissue sample for PD-L1 testing (by Ventana SP142 immunohistochemistry assay). Patients are randomized 1:1 to: (Arm A) BCG alone (six weekly instillations of BCG, followed by three weekly maintenance instillations at 3, 6, 12 months), or (Arm B) atezolizumab (1200 mg; IV; q3w for up to 1 year) combined with BCG given as in arm A. Treatment with atezolizumab and BCG are continued in the absence of unacceptable toxicity, for 1 year. The primary endpoint is recurrence-free survival in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary efficacy endpoints include overall survival, PFS, complete response, disease worsening, and quality of life. Safety, biomarkers, and other exploratory endpoints will also be evaluated. Enrollment began in December 2018 with a target of 614 pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03799835.
A phase III, randomized, open label, multicenter, global study of first-line (1L) durvalumab in combination with standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy and durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab and SOC chemotherapy versus SOC chemotherapy alone in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (UC).
Authors: Galsky Matt D. , Necchi Andrea , Sridhar Srikala S. , Ogawa Osamu , Angra Natasha , Hois Stephan , He Philip , Ghiorghiu Dana C. , Bellmunt Joaquim 
Published: May 2019

TPS4590 Background: Despite high response rates to 1L SoC for locally advanced or metastatic UC chemotherapy (gemcitabine + cisplatin or gemcitabine + carboplatin for patients who are cisplatin-ineligible [poor performance status, impaired renal function, comorbidities]), most patients experience disease progression. Novel strategies such as combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy offer hope for improving clinical outcomes. Durvalumab is a selective, high affinity, engineered human IgG1 mAb that blocks PD-L1 binding to PD-1 and CD80. Tremelimumab is a human IgG2 mAb directed against CTLA-4. The mechanisms of action of PD-1 and CTLA-4 are nonredundant, so targeting both checkpoint pathways may have additive or synergistic efficacy compared with monotherapy. Studies of platinum-based chemotherapy combined with checkpoint blockade in other tumor types have yielded improved efficacy with acceptable safety and support exploration of this approach for 1L locally advanced or metastatic UC. Methods: NILE (NCT03682068) is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, global trial that will enroll approximately 1265 patients with histologically or cytologically documented, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Patients will be randomized (1:1:1) to durvalumab + SoC chemotherapy, durvalumab + tremelimumab + SoC chemotherapy, or SoC chemotherapy as 1L therapy. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival using blinded independent central review assessments per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, OS at 24 months, proportion of patients alive and progression free at 12 months, duration of response, disease control rate, time from randomization to second progression, and health-related quality of life. Safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarkers will also be assessed. The study opened for enrollment in September 2018. 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. Clinical trial information: NCT03682068.