Cross-protective immune responses induced by sequential influenza virus infection and by sequential vaccination with inactivated influenza vaccines
Authors: Dong Wei , Bhide Yoshita , Sicca Federica , Meijerhof Tjarko , Guilfoyle Kate , Engelhardt Othmar G. , Boon Louis , de Haan Cornelis A.M. , Carnell George , Temperton Nigel , de Vries-Idema Jacqueline , Kelvin David , Huckriede Anke 
Published: May 2018

AbstractSequential infection with antigenically distinct influenza viruses induces cross-protective immune responses against heterologous virus strains in animal models. Here we investigated whether sequential immunization with antigenically distinct influenza vaccines can also provide cross-protection. To this end, we compared immune responses and protective potential against challenge with A(H1N1)pdm09 in mice infected sequentially with seasonal A(H1N1) virus followed by A(H3N2) virus or immunized sequentially with whole inactivated virus (WIV) or subunit (SU) vaccine derived from these viruses. Sequential infection provided solid cross-protection against A(H1N1)pdm09 infection while sequential vaccination with WIV, though not capable of preventing weight loss upon infection completely, protected the mice from reaching the humane endpoint. In contrast, sequential SU vaccination did not prevent rapid and extensive weight loss. Protection correlated with levels of cross-reactive but non-neutralizing antibodies of the IgG2a subclass, general increase of memory T cells and induction of influenza-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Adoptive serum transfer experiments revealed that despite lacking neutralizing activity, serum antibodies induced by sequential infection protected mice from weight loss and vigorous virus growth in the lungs upon A(H1N1)pdm09 virus challenge. Antibodies induced by WIV vaccination alleviated symptoms but could not control virus growth in the lung. Depletion of T cells prior to challenge revealed that CD8+ T cells, but not CD4+ T cells, contributed to cross-protection. These results imply that sequential immunization with WIV but not SU derived from antigenically distinct viruses could alleviate the severity of infection caused by a pandemic and may improve protection to unpredictable seasonal infection.ImportanceNew influenza virus strains entering the human population may have large impact and therefore their emergence requires immediate action. Yet, since these strains are unpredictable, vaccines cannot be prepared in advance, at least not as long as there is no universal or broadly protective influenza vaccine available. It is therefore important to elucidate in how far immunization strategies based on currently available seasonal vaccines can provide at least some protection against newly emerging virus strains. Moreover, insight in the possible mechanisms of protection can guide the further development of pre-pandemic immunization strategies. Our study presents a vaccination strategy based on sequential administration of readily available seasonal whole inactivated virus vaccines which could be easily applied in case of a new pandemic. In addition, our study identifies immune mechanisms, in particular cross-reactive non-neutralizing antibodies and CD8+ T cells, which should be targeted by broadly protective influenza vaccines.