Talar Motion is Constrained by Tricortical Screw Fixation of the Syndesmosis: A Cadaveric Robotic Study
Authors: Patel Neel K. , Pfeiffer Thomas Rudolf , Naendrup Jan-Hendrik , Murphy Conor , Zlotnicki Jason , Debski Richard , Musahl Volker , Hogan MaCalus Vinson 
Published: July 2018

Objectives: High ankle sprains are a common injury that occur in up to 11% of ankle sprains. Injury to the structures of the syndesmosis, the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), and interosseous membrane (IOM), has been shown to be predictive of residual symptoms after ankle injury. When the syndesmosis is unstable, it is typically treated surgically with cortical screw fixation or suture button fixation. Studies have shown that a 1 mm lateral shift of the talus relative to the tibia significantly decreases the tibiotalar contact area by 42%. Thus, restoring the tibiotalar kinematics to those of the intact ankle with appropriate fixation is important to avoid accelerated tibiotalar arthritis. The objective of this study was to quantify tibiotalar joint motion after syndesmotic screw and suture button fixation compared to the intact ankle. Methods: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age 60 yrs.; range 38-73 yrs.) were tested using a six degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. The subtalar joint was fused and the tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed to a robotic manipulator, while fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. Talar motion with respect to the tibia was measured using the robotic testing system. A 5 Nm external rotation moment and 5 Nm inversion moment were applied independently to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. Outcome variables included talar medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and internal/external rotation relative to the tibia in the following syndesmosis states: 1) intact, 2) AITFL transected, 3) AITFL, PITFL, and IOM transected, 4) 3.5 mm cannulated tricortical screw fixation, and 5) suture button fixation. An ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis was performed for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: There were significant differences in ML translation of the talus relative to the tibia between the tricortical screw fixation and the intact ankle. These significant changes were only present during states with no loads applied. Tricotical screw fixation resulted in a significant decrease in medial translation of the talus compared to the intact ankle at 30° plantarflexion and increased lateral translation at 0° flexion (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). The talus moved 1.1 mm less medially at 30° plantarflexion and 0.4 mm more laterally at 0° flexion in the tricortical screw fixation state compared to the intact ankle. The total medial translation of the talus relative to the tibia during plantarflexion decreased from 1.1 mm to only 0.4 mm. No significant difference in AP translation or external rotation of the talus existed between the tricortical screw fixation and the intact ankle. No significant differences existed in translation or rotation of the talus between the suture button fixation and intact ankle at any ankle positions. Conclusion: Suture button fixation restored tibiotalar motion in all planes, with no significant differences compared to the intact ankle. Tricortical screw fixation significantly increased lateral shift of the talus in a neutral ankle position and constrained motion during plantarflexion compared to the intact ankle, which can lead to accelerated tibiotalar arthritis. Thus, physicians should consider hardware removal after tricortical screw fixation for syndesmotic repair to avoid post-traumatic arthritis. [Figure: see text]