bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Barriers and Concerns Regarding Board Certification in Clinical Neuropsychology: A Program Evaluation
Authors: Reyes A , Tureson K , Arias J , Peraza J , Gonzalez D A , Lerner D , Santos C 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
The Relevance 2050 Initiative’s Student Pipeline Subcommittee and the Board Certification Promotion Committee of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, in collaboration with the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology, produced the first installment of a free webinar series to promote early education on board certification (BC) in clinical neuropsychology. A pre-webinar survey was given to inform future webinar topics and initiatives, including identification of specific barriers/concerns about BC.

Method
A total of 197 respondents completed the survey and self-identified as White (61%), Asian (16%), Hispanic (11%), African American (6%) and Multiracial (6%). Respondents’ demographics, type of doctoral program, program accreditation status, level of interest in pursuing BC, and specific barriers/concerns about BC were collected. Respondents self-identified with the following diverse groups: first-generation college student (19% White, 38% Asian, 18% Hispanic, 16% African American, 41% Multiracial), low SES (8% White, 6% Asian, 36% Hispanic, 33% African American, 33% Multiracial) and sexual gender minority (6% White, 6% Asian, 9% Hispanic, 43% Multiracial).

Outcomes
Qualitative data analysis of barriers/concerns identified the following themes: money, time, knowledge about BC, training flexibility, breadth of knowledge, training/mentor opportunities, international issues, and documentation. The top three barriers included training/mentor opportunities, training flexibility, and knowledge about BC. More than half of non-White trainees (60%; χ2 = 3.864, p = .049) endorsed training/mentor opportunities as a barrier relative to White trainees (41%), particularly among Hispanic trainees (82%) relative to other minority trainees.

Discussion
Results highlight the need to increase awareness and information about the BC. Also suggested is prioritization of resources for training/mentor opportunities, particularly for minority trainees.
A-04 Evaluating Race-Related Differences in Performance of Two App-based Cognitive Tasks
Authors: Evans S , John S , Willis-Parker M , Loring D , Goldstein F 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
Increased participation of African Americans (AA) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) clinical research is a national priority given their increased risk for developing AD. Removal of logistical barriers, such as time and travel costs, may increase AA participation. We developed two racially unbiased smartphone applications to assess cognition adapted from traditional tasks, the computerized Flanker test and paper-based Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). This study evaluated baseline performance and construct validity of the tasks in Non-Hispanic White (NHW) and AA participants.

Method
A sample of AA (n = 47) and NHW (n = 50) cognitively normal, middle-age and older adults (Mage = 60.73, SDage = 7.65) completed an in-clinic visit that included traditional assessments, as well as two app-based measures, Arrows and Number Match. Racial differences in group performance were evaluated with independent samples t-tests. Construct validity was assessed through inter-version correlations between traditional and app-based measures.

Results
There were no statistically significant differences between races on any metric of overall performance: Number Match (t(84) = 1.912, p = .06, 95% CI [-.130, 6.672]), Arrows average reaction time (RT) for incongruent trials (t(93) = -1.496, p = .14, 95% CI [-278.94, 39.27]), average RT for congruent trials (t(93) = -1.751, p = .083, 95% CI [-356.64, 22.44]), or average RT across all trials (t(93) = -1.691, p = .09, 95% CI [-298.21, 23.89]). The overall sample demonstrated small to moderate statistically significant inter-version correlations, from r = 0.39 to r = 0.55, ps < .01, with Number Match and SDMT showing a stronger association than Arrows and Flanker.

Conclusions
Preliminary data suggest no performance differences between races. Future research will evaluate the tasks’ ability to discriminate between clinical populations.
B-29 REM Sleep Behavior Disorder in Non-Demented Parkinson’s Disease is Related to Poorer Cognitive Performance
Authors: Mahmood Z , Van Patten R , Nakhla M , Twamley E , Filoteo J , Schiehser D 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) affects 33-46% of patients with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and may be a risk factor for neuropsychological impairment. However, the cognitive profile in PD patients with RBD has yet to be fully determined. This study examined differences in neuropsychological performance among non-demented PD patients with (PD/RBD+) and without RBD (PD/RBD-), and healthy controls (HC).

Methods
One hundred seventy-five participants, including 45 PD/RBD+ patients, 78 PD/RBD- patients, and 52 HC, completed the RBD sleep questionnaire and underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological battery assessing attention/working memory, language, visuospatial function, verbal and visual learning and memory, and executive function.

Results
The PD/RBD+ group demonstrated significantly poorer global neuropsychological performance compared to both the PD/RBD- and HC groups (p’s < .003; η_p^2 = .16). MANOVA demonstrated significant group differences on all individual cognitive domains (p’s < .001), except visuospatial function (p = .10). Both PD/RBD+ and PD/RBD- patients had significantly lower scores compared to the HCs in the domains of attention/working memory, language, learning, and memory. Additionally, the PD/RBD+ group had significantly lower executive functioning scores compared to the HCs, and poorer learning performance compared to the PD/RBD- group.

Conclusions
Compared to PD patients without RBD, PD/RBD+ patients have greater levels of cognitive impairment specific to the acquisition of new information. Moreover, PD/RBD+ patients have greater executive dysfunction compared to HCs, underscoring the importance of RBD assessment for improved detection and treatment of neuropsychological impairment (e.g., targeted cognitive interventions). Longitudinal investigations are needed to determine the enduring effects of RBD in PD.
B-33 Cognitive Mechanisms Associated with Emotion-Focused Pulling in Trichotillomania
Authors: Carlson E , Haaga D 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
A revised version of the Milwaukee Inventory for Subtypes of Trichotillomania-Adult (MIST-A) provides scores for two distinct behavioral patterns of hair pulling in trichotillomania: emotion and intention pulling. The current study explored the relationship between these scales and several cognitive domains.

Method
This study used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavior therapy intervention for trichotillomania. Participants from the general community were eligible if they met diagnostic criteria for trichotillomania. Thirty-two individuals were enrolled and completed baseline measures. The sample was 78% female, and the mean age was 34. At baseline, participants completed diagnostic interviews, self-report symptom questionnaires, and tasks from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (the stop-signal test, the intra/extra dimensional shift task, and the Cambridge gambling task ). These provided scores of intra and extra dimensional set-shifting, response inhibition, decision making quality, and sensitivity to risk. Correlational analyses were conducted comparing each cognitive score to each MIST-A score.

Results
Analyses revealed significant negative correlations between emotion pulling score and decision making quality r (30) = -.383, = .031 and emotion pulling score and sensitivity to risk r (30) = -.396, p = .025.

Conclusion
These findings provide initial insight into some of the cognitive mechanisms associated with emotion focused pulling. Individuals who pull their hair with the aim of reducing negative emotions (e.g. boredom, anxiety) showed themselves on the gambling task to be more willing to bet on an unlikely outcome, and less willing to adjust their betting amount according to the likelihood of an outcome.
B-41 SPECT Differences between Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Authors: Lopez Palacios D , Lopez A , McDonald B , Golden C , Amen D , Willeumier K , Taylor D 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
To assess whether diagnosed Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) interactively alter brain activity, as measured by a Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging.

Method
The sample included adults diagnosed with OCD (n = 915) with a mean age of 34.65 and predominantly male (68.6%) and adults with PTSD (n = 1,481) which had a mean age of 41.33 and was predominantly female (57.2%). Significant differences were observed for gender . Multiple ANCOVAs were conducted to determine differences between cerebral blood flow (CBF)in 17 different brain regions.

Results
Results showed hyper-perfusion in the PTSD group as compared to the OCD group in the pariental L/R[F(1,2393) = 6.47,p < 0.01/F(1,2393) = 12.31,p < .01], motor sensory L/R[F(1,2393) = 19.33,p < .001/F(1,2393) = 17.32,p < .01] and temporal left [F(1,2393) = 12.49,p < .01].

Conclusion
Significantly higher rCBF in the pariental and motor sensory for OCD individuals may be due to visual-constructive and controlled fluency which are usually associated with compulsion. Due to the hyperalert nature related with OCD rituals, these areas are more active when compared to PTSD. Hyperfusion was reported for PTSD in the left temporal lobe compared to OCD, this region is usually associated with registering potential threasts in the environment. This can be explained by the hypervigilant conduct seen in individuals with PTSD. Overall, it appears that individuals with OCD struggle with continual inability to inhibit repetitive thoughts and behaviors due to the over activation in the motor sensory and parietal region. Alternatively, the activation in PTSD individuals can be a result of a way to help them cope with threats in the environment.
B-74 Using Rates of Low Scores to Assess Agreement between ANAM4 TBI-MIL and a Traditional Battery of Neuropsychological Tests
Authors: Ivins B , Arrieux J , Cole W , Schwab K 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
The Automated Neurological Assessment Metrics (Version 4) Traumatic Brain Injury Military (ANAM4 TBI-MIL) battery is widely used by the US military to assess cognitive function. We compare intra-individual agreement between ANAM4 TBI-MIL and a battery of traditional neuropsychological tests using rates of low scores.

Methods
Complete and valid data from 246 healthy soldiers and 177 soldiers ≤7 days from sustaining mild TBI (mTBI) were used in this analysis. All soldiers were consecutively administered ANAM4 TBI-MIL and a traditional test battery consisting of: TOPF, WAIS-IV, CVLT-II, RCFT, DKEFS, and CPT-II. We performed base rate analyses of both batteries to determine the proportions of soldiers who had various numbers of scores that were 1.0+, 1.5+, and 2.0+ standard deviations below the normative mean. We used those rates to place Soldiers into a “low score hierarchy” ranging from the least poor (i.e. ~≥10th %ile) to the worst overall performance (i.e. ~≤10th %ile). We then compared agreement between the batteries at each of those levels.

Results
More soldiers with mTBI had low scores than healthy soldiers on both batteries. Of the soldiers who performed at the worst level on one battery, 88.1% from ANAM and 100% from traditional had some level of poor performance on the other battery. However, of the soldiers who performed at the worst level on either battery, only 58.3% from ANAM and 50.0% from traditional also performed at the worst level on the other battery.

Conclusion
These batteries similarly identify poor performance to a degree, though with some potentially meaningful differences still present.
C-45 A Descriptive Analysis of Change in Concussion Knowledge in Collegiate Student-Athletes Participating in a Novel Peer Concussion Education Program
Authors: Wenke B , Ernst W , Kneavel M , McCarthy K 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
This pilot study investigated the effect of a novel peer concussion education program on concussion knowledge in a sample of collegiate student-athletes.

Method
A pre-posttest design was employed to determine the effect of the program on concussion knowledge in a sample of 50 student-athletes (34 Men’s Lacrosse and 16 Women’s Soccer) participating at the NCAA Division II level of competition. Male participants made up 68% of the sample (n = 34). The majority of participants were white (88%). Concussion knowledge was assessed with a checklist adapted from Gioia and Collins’ (2006) Acute Concussion Evaluation and McLeod et al.’s (2007) questionnaire. This checklist included 19 actual symptoms and 8 false symptoms.

Results
A repeated-measures T Test was conducted to analyze pre-test and post-test scores of total concussion symptom knowledge. The results revealed a significant increase in concussion symptom knowledge after participation in the program, t(48) = 4.2, p < 0.001, d = 0.59. A domain analysis indicated that at baseline, cognitive symptoms were accurately identified at a rate ranging from 68 to 90%, sensory/physical at a rate ranging from 74 to 98% and affective ranging from 42 to 68%. At posttest, these ranges increased to 92-98% for cognitive, 88 to 100% for sensory/physical and 84 to 88% for affective symptoms. Non-symptoms were incorrectly endorsed at a rate ranging from 54 to 92% at baseline and 56 to 76% at posttest.

Conclusions
The program appears to have potential for increasing knowledge of actual concussion symptoms; however, incorrect endorsement of non-symptoms persisted at a relatively high rate despite participation in the program.
C-69 Neuropsychological Functioning in a Patient with an Unspecified Pediatric Movement Disorder Without Abnormal Brain MRI
Authors: von Buttlar A , Butcher B 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
Neuropsychological profiles of patients with pediatric movement disorders are not fully understood, though research suggests greater impairments in cognitive processes reliant on white matter functional integrity. Interpretation of neuropsychological data in these patients is often informed by imaging data that suggests specific areas of brain abnormality. The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the neurocognitive profile of a patient with an unspecified, progressive movement disorder with onset in middle childhood with no observable brain abnormality.

Method
The patient is an 11-year-old, right-handed male with a history of spastic diplegia and ataxia, onset at seven years of age, in the context of a normal brain MRI and genetic anomaly of unclear clinical significance. Patient has since experienced progressive weakness and spasticity of his bilateral lower limbs, and increasing inflammation in the upper thoracic region. He also has a history of auditory hallucinations.

Results
His neuropsychological profile was indicative of white matter and right hemispheric dysfunction in the brain with well-preserved left hemisphere functions. He demonstrated stronger verbal reasoning and verbally-based executive functioning abilities compared to visual-spatial reasoning and visual perception. Deficits in sustained attention, vigilance, working memory, and processing speed were also noted. Psychomotor coordination and planning was impaired bilaterally, with more pronounced left-hand deficits. He also demonstrated significant speech dysarthria and dyspraxia. He denied experiencing auditory hallucinations in the past six months.

Conclusions
This patient’s neurocognitive profile is largely consistent with literature on neuropsychological functioning in pediatric movement disorders despite the absence of an identifiable region of brain abnormality.
A-47 Self-reported Difficulties in Retrospective Memory Predict Poor Verbal Memory Performance
Authors: Stypulkowski K , Roberts J , Robledo A , Maxfield M 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
Prospective and retrospective memory complaints are common among older adults with mixed results regarding their relationship with objective memory performance. This study investigated how subjective memory reports relate to objective memory function in a clinical sample.

Method
Participants (N = 139, Mage = 69.9, SD = 9.2) completed a cognitive screen at a university clinic. The assessment included the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (verbal memory), the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test – Revised (visual memory) and the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire, a subjective memory measure with higher scores indicating greater perceived difficulties. Correlations and linear regressions were used to evaluate the relationship between subjective and objective memory (a priori p-value = .01).

Results
Retrospective memory was correlated with immediate (r = -.35, p < .001) and delayed verbal memory (r = -.31, p < .001) but unrelated to visual memory (p > .05). Prospective memory was not correlated with performance on visual or verbal memory tasks (p > .05). Retrospective memory accounted for 12.3% of the variation in immediate (adjusted R2 = 11.6%; medium effect size), and 9.3% of the variation in delayed verbal memory (adjusted R2 = 8.6%; small effect size). Retrospective memory significantly predicted immediate [F(1, 132) = 18.48, p < .001, 95% CI = -1.04 to -0.38] and delayed verbal memory scores [F(1, 132) = 13.51, p < .001, 95% CI = -1.09 to -0.33].

Conclusions
Subjective reports of retrospective memory may be a better indicator of objective verbal memory performance than prospective memory in a clinical sample of older adults.
A-54 Greater Time Spent Watching TV is Related to Worse Real-Time Neurocognitive Performance in Older Adults With and Without HIV
Authors: Kamarsu S , Campbell L , paolillo E , Filip T , Swendsen J , Depp C , Moore R 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
There is a need to identify determinants of neurocognitive impairment among older persons living with HIV (PLHIV). Utilizing smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) and mobile cognitive testing, we examined the relationships between daily life activities and real-world neurocognitive performance among older PLHIV and HIV-uninfected adults.

Method
Ninety-one participants (58 PLHIV; Mage = 59.4, SD = 6.4), 70.3% male, 65.9% non-Hispanic white, completed four smartphone-based EMA surveys of daily activities and one mobile color-word interference test (mCWIT) per day for 14 days. Daily activities were grouped into five categories: activities of daily living (ADLs, IADLs), cognitively demanding activities, socially-engaging activities, physical activity (PA), and passive leisure activity (watching TV). Data was collapsed across the 14 days to examine between-person effects of the proportion of time reportedly spent on each activity on neurocognitive outcomes (the average correct responses and completion time for the mCWIT).

Results
No effect was found for engaging in activities by HIV status; however, PLHIV had significantly longer times on the mCWIT compared to persons without HIV (t = 2.49; 95% CI: 0.60, 5.37; p = 0.02). In a multivariable regression model accounting for HIV status, a greater proportion of time spent watching TV was associated with slower average mCWIT performance (beta = 9.41; 95% CI: 1.88,17.0; p = 0.01). There were no relationships between other domains of daily life activities and mCWIT performance.

Conclusion
Our findings provide evidence that more time spent watching TV is associated with slower mCWIT performance. Future work examining the time-lagged relationships between these variables is needed to understand whether watching TV decreases real-time neurocognitive performance.
A-81 MoCA Cutoffs for English/ Spanish Bilingual Veterans Assessed in English
Authors: Phillips J , Marceaux J , McCoy K , Kraemer L , Fullen C 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a well-known screener of global cognitive functioning. Multiple studies have determined optimal cutoff scores for detection of cognitive impairment in various clinical populations. This study aims to determine appropriate cutoff scores in a clinically mixed bilingual (English/Spanish) sample.

Methods
A sample of n = 57 self-identified bilingual veterans referred for neuropsychological evaluation at a VA hospital completed the MoCA as part of a full battery. All tests were administered in English. The majority were male (96.4%), Hispanic/Latinx, with 14.65 mean years of education. Only MoCA total score without adding one point for ≤12 years of education was included. Descriptive statistics were used for sample characterization. ROC curve analysis assessed diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA for classification of cognitive impairment (CI). The CI group (n = 40) included both major or mild neurocognitive disorder. The nonimpaired group (n = 17) included persons with no CI or psychiatric diagnosis.

Results
ROC curve analysis was significant (p < .001) with an AUC of .857 (95% confidence interval .746-.969). A cutoff score of ≤24 was yielded an optimal balance of sensitivity (.900) and specificity (.706). Follow-up independent samples t-test and ANOVA were conducted to examine differences between groups.

Conclusions
Among bilingual individuals, a cutoff of ≤24 on the MoCA maximized sensitivity and specificity of accurately identifying cases of cognitive impairment. Findings have implications for identifying patients requiring further neuropsychological assessment.
A-82 Neuropsychological Assessment in the Age of Technology: Comparing Traditional Paper versus Electronic Administration
Authors: Johnson E , Anderson-Hanley C , Puleio A , Wall K 
Published: August 2019

Abstract

Objective
As society becomes more interconnected with technology, it is important to examine how traditional “paper and pencil” administered neuropsychological tests can be utilized in digital electronic forms (e.g., computers, touch screen tablets, and smartphones). Literature has shown somewhat mixed outcomes for the validity of computerized tests. Gathering data electronically has been found to reduce human error in both test administration and in data collection itself. Digitizing carries benefits in the research field where electronic administration may make it possible to gather data on a larger scale numerically and geographically. However, in some conversions to digital versions of a task, changes may be made to the stimuli and procedure that might seemingly be benign, but could activate different cognitive responses, potentially compromising construct validity. This study examined the comparability of paper and electronic forms of the Stroop task, which is used widely and has been previously validated in paper form.

Method
Electronic Stroop tests were examined for concurrent validity with a paper version. Two touch-screen based apps were examined: BrainBaseline for the iPad and EncephalApp for smartphone. Young and older adults (n = 58) completed paper and an electronic version of the Stroop.

Results
Correlation analyses revealed a significant, but modest relationship between paper Stroop and the BrainBaseline version (r = .54; p = .001), while the EncephalApp correlation was non-significant (r = .44; p = .18).

Conclusions
These results need to be verified in a larger sample, but the implication is that some paper and electronic versions of cognitive tests are not necessarily interchangeable, and caution should be used.