bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in cisplatin unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: A randomized phase II study (COACH, KCSG GU10-16).
Authors: Lee Jae-Lyun , Kim Bong-Seog , Lim Ho Yeong , Kim Hee Jun , Park Inkeun , Choi Yoon Ji , Park Kyong Hwa , Lee Kyung Hee , Yoon Shinkyo , Hong Bumsik , Hong Jun Hyuck , Ahn Hanjong 
Published: May 2019

4534 Background: We investigated the activity and safety of first-line gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GemOx) compared with gemcitabine-carboplatin (GCb) in cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced UCCC. Methods: Treatment naïve, cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced UCCC were randomly assigned to GemOx [gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2, oxliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1) every 2 weeks] or GCb (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on D1 and D8, carboplatin AUCC 4.5 on D1 every 3 weeks) stratified by ECOG performance status (PS) and visceral metastases. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Between January 2011 and Mar 2017, 80 patients were enrolled; 39 patients and 40 patients were allocated to GCb and GemOx arm, respectively. Median age was 72 years (range 46-84) in GCb arm and 72.5 (55-85) in GemOx arm. ECOG PS was 2 in 41% (GCb arm) and 43% (GemOx arm), and median GFR was 45 ml/min (interquartile range 36-56) in GCb and 47 ml/min (37-56) in GemOx arm. ORR were 48.7% and 55.0% in GCb and GemOx, respectively. With a median follow-up duration of 37.8 months, median PFS and OS in GCb and GemOx arm were 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.8-6.2) vs. 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.1) and 9.1 months (95% CI, 5.2-13.0) vs. 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.9-15.0), respectively. Grade 3 leukopenia, neutropenia and fatigue were significantly more common in GCb arm (26% vs. 3%, p=0.003; 33% vs. 10%, p=0.014; 15% vs. 3%, p=0.057) while any grade neuropathy was more common in GemOx (8% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Conclusions: GemOx has showed comparable efficacy with GCb and favorable hematologic toxicity profile. GemOx may be used as a new option for UCCC patients who are not suitable for platinum-containing chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01487915.
FGFR-altered, advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) and response to chemotherapy prior to receiving erdafitinib.
Authors: Necchi Andrea , Siefker-Radtke Arlene O. , Zhong Bob , Mahadevia Parthiv Jasvant , Santiago-Walker Ademi E. , De Porre Peter , Loriot Yohann 
Published: May 2019

4542 Background: FGFR-altered, advanced UC has predominantly a luminal 1 subtype, which is associated with lower response rates to immunotherapy and possibly also to chemotherapy. Objective response rates (ORR) for first-line cisplatin-based regimens, such as gemcitabine-cisplatin (gem/cis) and methotrexate-vinblastine-doxorubicin-cisplatin (MVAC), historically range between 45-60% and for gemcitabine-carboplatin (gem/carbo) 35-45%. However, the ORR on chemotherapy for the ~20% of patients with FGFR-altered tumors is unknown. Methods: BLC2001 (NCT02365597) is an ongoing global open-label phase 2 study of the pan-FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC with specific FGFR2/3 gene alterations. Patients who had received first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) chemotherapy for advanced UC were identified. Investigator-reported ORR (complete + partial responses) and median time to progression (TTP) on these pretreatments were analyzed. Results: Of 210 patients treated with erdafitinib in BLC2001, 191 had received prior systemic therapy including 184 and 83 patients who had received 1L and 2L chemotherapy, respectively. ORR were 29.3% (54/184; 95% CI 22.8%, 35.9%) to 1L chemotherapy and 24.1% (20/83; 95% CI 14.9%, 33.3%) to 2L chemotherapy. 1L therapy consisted of gem/cis in 94 patients, gem/carbo in 59 patients, and MVAC in 22 patients, with ORR (95% CI) of 35.1% (25.5%, 44.8%), 25.4% (14.3%, 36.5%), and 22.7% (5.2%, 40.2%), respectively. In the 2L setting, of 46 patients who had received a regimen containing a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) or vinflunine, 8 patients (17.4%; 95% CI 6.4%, 28.3%) achieved an objective response. Median TTP was 7.16 mo (95% CI 6.18, 7.49) after 1L chemotherapy (7.6 mo for gem/cis, 6.3 mo for gem/carbo, and 5.3 mo for MVAC) and 4.35 mo (95% CI 3.3, 5.5) after 2L chemotherapy (3.6 mo for taxane or vinflunine). Conclusions: In this post-hoc analysis, the overall ORR to prior 1L chemotherapy was lower, but within the range expected based on historical data. Further investigation into the response to chemotherapy in FGFR alteration positive patients is warranted and may be useful for the development of 1L trials of combination therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02365597.
Erdafitinib in high-risk patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC).
Authors: Park Se Hoon , Loriot Yohann , Zhong Bob , Hussain Syed A. , Mahadevia Parthiv Jasvant , De Porre Peter , Siefker-Radtke Arlene O. 
Published: May 2019

4543 Background: The pan-FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib exhibited a robust objective response rate (ORR) and tolerability among pts with FGFR2/3-altered advanced UC in the BLC2001 (NCT02365597) phase 2 study (Siefker-Radtke ASCO 2018 #4503). Here we report a post hoc subgroup analysis to explore efficacy among high-risk pts. Methods: The analysis included 99 BLC2001 pts who received the optimized dose regimen of 8 mg/d continuous (pharmacodynamically guided uptitrated to 9 mg/d per serum phosphate). Results for ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by select baseline variables, with high-risk defined as age >75 y, ECOG PS 2, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, visceral metastases, and 2 or 3 Bellmunt risk factors. Results: Efficacy results (Table) show investigator-assessed ORR >36% and median PFS >5 mo across all subgroups except ECOG PS 2. OS data are immature but generally follow the trend of PFS. With the exception of ECOG 2, there were no differences in G3/4 serious AE proportions by subgroup. Conclusions: The post hoc subgroup findings support that erdafitinib generally provides comparable efficacy in high-risk pts with FGFR-altered advanced UC as the overall population. Clinical trial information: NCT02365597. [Table: see text]
Immune correlates of CD73 expression in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC).
Authors: Lin Edwin , Nussenzveig Roberto , Hahn Andrew W , Yandell Mark , Harshman Lauren Christine , Agarwal Neeraj , Tripathi Abhishek 
Published: May 2019

4548 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes in UC. However, response rates are low and additional mechanisms of immune evasion need to be ascertained. CD73 (encoded by NT5E) converts extracellular AMP to adenosine, which exerts an immunosuppressive effect in the tumor microenvironment by inhibiting infiltrating T and NK cells. Utilizing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) bladder cancer dataset, we evaluated correlations between NT5E expression and the immune milieu in UC. Methods: RNA-seq data from 411 primary UC tumor samples were obtained from the TCGA. Patients were split into low, intermediate, and high NT5E expression groups (≤ -1, -1 to 1 and ≥1 standard deviation from the overall mean). A tumor inflammation signature (TIS) reflecting an inflamed tumor phenotype was calculated based on the averaged expression of 18 previously validated genes (Ayers et al, 2017). NT5E expression was compared between tumors with high and low TIS scores and among the TCGA molecular subtypes. Abundance of infiltrating immune cell subsets was estimated based on expression of previously identified 782 immune metagenes and compared between NT5E expression groups (Charoentong et al, 2017). The Mann-Whitney U test assessed statistical significance, and the Bonferroni correction was used to control for false discovery rate. Results: NT5E expression was significantly higher in tumors with a high TIS score compared to those with low TIS score (P<0.0001) and correlated with expression of other immune checkpoints such as PD-L1, IDO and LAG-3 (each P<0.01). Patients with basal/squamous subtype had the highest NT5E expression compared to luminal or neuronal subtypes. High NT5E expression was associated with increased infiltrating NK cells, neutrophils, Tregs and decreased Type 2 T helper cells. Conclusions: High expression of NT5E in UC patients with an inflamed tumor phenotype was associated with an increase in infiltrating Tregs, and the basal/squamous subtype. Our findings highlight a potential role of CD73-adenosine pathway as a mechanism of immune evasion and a novel therapeutic target in UC. Further studies to assess the clinical impact of NT5E expression on outcomes in UC patients treated with immunotherapy are needed. AT and NA: equal contribution.
An FDA analysis of the association between adverse events and outcome in patients with urothelial cancer receiving a programmed death protein 1 or programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/L1) antibody.
Authors: Weinstock Chana , Maher Virginia Ellen , Fernandes Laura L. , Tang Shenghui , Agrawal Sundeep , Brave Michael Holman , Ning Yang-Min , Singh Harpreet , Suzman Daniel L. , Xu James , Goldberg Kirsten B. , Sridhara Rajeshwari , Ibrahim Amna , Theoret Marc Robert , Beaver Julia A. , Pazdur Richard 
Published: May 2019

4549 Background: To assess the relationship between tumor response rate, overall survival, and the development of related adverse events of special interest (AESIs) or related immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) in patients with urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies. Methods: We examined seven trials that led to drug approval and which included 1747 patients with metastatic or locally advanced urothelial cancer treated with an anti-PD-1/L1 antibody. Five trials enrolled patients who had received prior platinum-based therapy and two enrolled patients who were cisplatin-ineligible. The datasets were searched for AESIs, related AESIs, imAEs, and related imAEs. The relationship to study drug was determined by the Investigator. Immune-mediated adverse events were defined as AESIs treated with topical or systemic corticosteroids. Results: In these exploratory analyses, a related AESI was reported in 64% of responding patients and in 34% of patients who did not respond to the anti-PD-1/L1 antibody while a related imAE occurred in 28% and 12% of patients who did and did not respond to study drug, respectively. In a responder analysis, an increase in overall survival was seen in patients with related AESIs compared to those with no related AESI [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.49]. Fifty-seven percent of responding patients with a related AESI reported a related AESI prior to documentation of response. Conclusions: Patients who responded to treatment with an anti-PD-1/L1 antibody were more likely to report a related AESI or related imAE. This relationship did not appear to be due to the increased duration of exposure in responding patients. Systemic corticosteroid use did not appear to affect the duration of response.
A pilot presurgical study evaluating anti-PD-L1 durvalumab (durva) plus anti-CTLA-4 tremelimumab (treme) in patients (pts) with high-risk muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC) who are ineligible for cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
Authors: Gao Jianjun , Siefker-Radtke Arlene O. , Navai Neema , Campbell Matthew T , Slack Tidwell Rebecca , Guo Charles , Kamat Ashish M. , Matin Surena F. , Araujo John C. , Shah Amishi Yogesh , Msaouel Pavlos , Blando Jorge M. , Vence Luis M. , Duan Fei , Basu Sreyashi , Singh Shalini , Zhao Hao , Allison James Patrick , Dinney Colin P.N. , Sharma Padmanee 
Published: May 2019

4551 Background: In MIBC pts, especially in those with high risk features including lymphovascular invasion, hydronephrosis, T3b disease, or variant histology, cisplatin-based NAC followed by cystectomy improves overall survival as compared with cystectomy alone. However, it is estimated that over 50% of pts with MIBC are ineligible for cisplatin-containing therapy. Therefore, we propose this pre-surgical trial with durva + treme for this population of pts. Methods: This is a single-arm, pre-surgical clinical trial with durva + treme in pts with localized, high-risk MIBC (cT2-T4a) who are ineligible for cisplatin-based NAC due to decreased renal function, neuropathy, hearing loss, or heart failure; or refuse cisplatin-based NAC (NCT02812420). Each patient receives durva (1500 mg) plus treme (75 mg) on weeks 1 and 5. Pts then undergo surgery at week 9-11. Pre- and post-treatment blood and tumor samples are collected for correlative biological analyses. Results: Twenty eight of 35 pts have been enrolled on this trial. Twenty-one pts have completed cystectomy as of 11/16/19. Of these 21 pts, 9 (43%) had pathologically complete response (pCR) and two (10%) had pathologic T1N0 (pT1) disease (≤pT1N0 rate = 52%). Fourteen of 21 (67%) had down-staging of disease. Of note, 10 of these 21 pts had 3-D mass (T3) on exam under anesthesia or clinical T4a disease; 5 of these 10 pts (50%) had pCR and one (10%) had pT1 disease (≤pT1N0 rate = 60%). Only 5 of 28 (17%) pts developed grade 3 immune related toxicity including hepatitis and amylase/lipase elevation, and two (7%) resulted in surgery delay for > 30 days. Immune profiling with CyTOF analysis of baseline peripheral blood indicates that pts with pCR have significantly lower frequency of a Th2 subset as compared to pts with up-staging of disease. In addition, gene expression profiling analysis of baseline tumor tissues demonstrates a significantly less immunosuppressive microenvironment in pts with pCR as compared to pts with up-staging of disease. Conclusions: Our data indicate that durva plus treme is an effective and safe neoadjuvant therapy for pts with MIBC ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy. Therefore, neoadjuvant therapy with durva + treme and a number of potential biomarkers warrant testing in a larger phase 3 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT 02812420.
Causes of patient ineligibility in clinical trials of metastatic urothelial cancer.
Authors: Ison Gwynn , Maher Virginia Ellen , Weinstock Chana , Agrawal Sundeep , Brave Michael Holman , Ning Yang-Min , Singh Harpreet , Xu James , Ibrahim Amna , Beaver Julia A. , Pazdur Richard 
Published: May 2019

4556 Background: Registrational trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy help inform clinicians and patients about the expected outcomes of patients receiving these drugs. However, the clinical trial population does not reflect all patients with the underlying disease. There have been ongoing efforts to expand eligibility criteria for clinical trial enrollment that are expected to mitigate some of these factors. We reviewed four registrational trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy to better understand why patients were deemed ineligible for trial enrollment and whether expanded eligibility criteria may have addressed the reasons for ineligibility. Methods: We reviewed four trials that led to approval of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. These trials screened 1931 and enrolled 1253 patients with metastatic or locally advanced urothelial cancer who had previously received platinum-based therapy. We examined the datasets to determine patient demographics and reasons for trial ineligibility. Results: There were no differences in the demographics characteristics of patients who were eligible or ineligible for study treatment. However, when compared to the SEER database the screened population was younger, and minorities were under-represented. Causes of patient ineligibility included: 1) Lack of Tumor Tissue/PD-L1 Low Tumor Staining (23%), 2) Underlying Disease characteristics were not met (19%), 3) Laboratory Abnormalities (18%), 4) Excluded Co-morbid Conditions (16%), 5) Poor Performance Status (15%), 6) Refused Consent (10%), 7) Other (7%), and 8) Incorrect Prior Therapy (5%). Conclusions: Clinical trial accrual should be representative of all patients with the underlying disease. Changes in trial eligibility criteria such as less stringent requirements concerning tumor tissue (when possible), co-morbid conditions, laboratory abnormalities, and performance status may improve patient accrual. These, when added together, formed the majority of the reasons for clinical trial ineligibility.
RNAseq and DNA whole-exome sequence analysis reveal novel response signatures to IO treatment in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients.
Authors: Mayhew Gregory , Shibata Yoichiro , Uronis Joshua M , Hayward Michele C , Rose Tracy L , Kim William Y. , Perou Charles M. , Lai-Goldman Myla , Milburn Michael Vance 
Published: May 2019

4558 Background: Objective: To examine in a cohort of anti-PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICP) treated urothelial cancer patients a strategy combining treatment outcomes with molecular alterations, pathways, and immune/tumor microenvironment features to determine potential responder and rapid-progression signatures. Methods: De-identified clinical history and treatment outcomes were collected on 109 MIBC patients treated with ICP agents. Archived FFPE samples from these patients were obtained and processed for mRNAseq, exome-seq, tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) and mutation panel testing. Comprehensive tumor/immune profiling is being analyzed in the context of ICP treatments and RECIST 1.1 outcomes. A 60 gene MIBC 4-typer expression subtyper and other response associated predictors are used to stratify and identify positive/negative ICP response indicators. Results: 109 patients were identified (median age 75, 64% male, 78% white, 17% black). 74% of patients had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy, and 12% had received 2 or more prior lines of therapy. At initiation of ICP, 28% of patients had hemoglobin < 10, 30% had liver metastases, and 59% had ECOG performance status > 0. Mutation analysis of the first 66 patients showed TP53 (n = 34, 52%), FGFR (n = 17, 26%), CDKN2A (n = 13, 20%) and RB1 (n = 12, 18%) as the top alterations. No patients (0/8) with known pathogenic mutations in FGFR3 (S249C and TACC3-fusion) responded to ICP. Of patients with T2 staging prior to ICP (37/66), overall survival was markedly shorter (2.7 years) in those possessing FGFR3 mutations (n = 6/37) compared to that for FGFR3 WT patients (5.7 years, n = 31/37; p = 0.045). Further analyses of molecular features relative to treatment outcomes are ongoing to characterize response signatures. Conclusions: Our preliminary cohort of patients with pathogenic FGFR3 alterations showed 0% favorable response to ICP. We are expanding on this observation with further comprehensive molecular analyses and retrospective treatments/outcomes data. We anticipate identifying expression signatures that reflect ICP patient responder/non-responder signatures that may aid in future therapy decisions.
A reduced pazopanib dose with food: Is it more patient-friendly and does it reduce drug costs?
Authors: Lubberman Floor , Gelderblom Hans , Hamberg Paul , Vervenne Walter , Mulder Sasja F. , Jansman Frank , Colbers Angela , Van Der Graaf Winette T.A. , Burger David , Luelmo Saskia , Moes Dirk Jan A.R. , Van Herpen Carla M.L.- , Van Erp Nielka P. 
Published: May 2019

4564 Background: Pazopanib has been licensed for advanced soft tissue sarcoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a fixed oral daily dose of 800mg taken fasted. We hypothesized that ingesting pazopanib with food may improve patients’ comfort and reduce gastro-intestinal adverse events. Moreover, a food intervention, resulting in a better absorption, can lead to a lower dose, which could significantly reduce treatment costs. Methods: Part 1 of the study was performed to determine whether 600mg pazopanib taken with a continental breakfast was bioequivalent to 800mg pazopanib taken fasted. In part 2, differences in GI-toxicity and patient satisfaction were assessed by the cancer-therapy-satisfaction-questionnaire after both intake regimens. Finally, patient’s preference for either intake regimen was asked. Results: 16 patients were included in the bioequivalence study. The geometric mean ratio (fed/fasted) of the area under the plasma concentration time curve was 1.10 (90% CI 1.00-1.19), maximum peak concentration was 1.12 (90% CI 1.02-1.22) and pazopanib trough concentration was 1.10 (90% CI 1.02-1.18). In part 2, 60 patients were included. No differences were seen in the occurrence of GI-toxicities under both intake regimens. Patients seem to be more positive about their feelings about side effects (72.3(95% CI 68.1-76.5) vs 68·2 (62.7-73.6); p=.092) and satisfaction with therapy scores were higher (84.7(95% CI 81.4-87.9) vs 81.9 (78.7-85.2); p= .059) when pazopanib was taken with food. 41 (68%) of the patients preferred the intake with continental breakfast. Conclusions: Intake of 600mg pazopanib with food results in bioequivalent exposure and was preferred over a standard pazopanib dose without food. Moreover, with this simple food intervention a large cost reduction can be realized in patients treated with pazopanib. Clinical trial information: NCT02138526.
Comparative genomic profiling from tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in 111 patients (Pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Authors: Kotecha Ritesh , Gedvilaite Erika , Murray Samuel J. , Motzer Robert J. , Tsui Dana , Voss Martin Henner 
Published: May 2019

4565 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessment is a non-invasive approach for genomic interrogation of solid tumors. As a novel tool, key benchmarks for applications in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) are yet to be determined. To understand the utility of ctDNA, we performed a large cohort analysis using a comparative genomics approach integrating matched primary tissue and ctDNA genomic data. Methods: Pts with prior tumor mutational profiles generated via next generation sequencing (NGS) from nephrectomy or metastatic specimens underwent single-time point plasma collection. Targeted NGS sequencing with MSK-IMPACT was performed on tumor and ctDNA with subsequent bi-directional cross genotyping using Waltz 2.0. All pts had matched germline comparison from peripheral blood; clinical data was extracted from medical record. Liberal (1-2 reads) and stringent (≥3 reads) filters were applied, with a cut-off of < 30% allele frequency to remove germline mutations. Results: 111 mccRCC pts, of whom available IMDC-risk was favorable (35%), intermediate (60%), and poor-risk (5%) were included for analysis. The median time between tissue and ctDNA collection was 23 months (R: 1-177), and 96% of patients had undergone nephrectomy prior to ctDNA collection. In primary tissue sequencing, 64/111 (58%) from nephrectomy and 42/111 (42%) from metastatic sites, 569 unique alterations were identified across the whole cohort, with a median of 4 mutations/pt (R:1-23). RCC-specific alterations included VHL (88%), PBRM1 (48%), SETD2 (34%), KDM5C (17%), TP53 (14%). Across the cohort, 176 alterations were identified in ctDNA. With cross genotyping, ctDNA alterations concordant with primary tumors were detected in 20% (22/111 pts, 28 unique alterations) using stringent criteria with a median of 1 mutation/pt (R:1-2). Using liberal criteria, concordance with primary tumors was 59% (66/111 pts, 142 unique alterations) with a median of 2 mutations/pt (R: 1-8). Conclusions: This large cohort study matching oncogenomics from tumor and ctDNA highlights complexities and challenges of applying liquid biopsy in biomarker development in mccRCC.