Low-Temperature CO Oxidation Over CuO-TiO2 Nanocatalysts
Authors: Al-Qaradawi Siham , Zedan Abdallah F. , Rady Hossam S. , Soliman Khaled , Aljaber Amina S. , Allam Nageh K. 
Published: July 2019

Among the diverse catalytic processes, the heterogeneous catalytic CO oxidation is an important reaction for removal of small amounts of poisoning CO in fuel cell applications and environmental remediation. Therefore, there is a great need to develop highly active and stable nanocatalysts for catalytic CO oxidation at low temperature. Plasmonic nanocatalysts supported on reducible metal oxide such as CeO2 and TiO2 have been known for their superior catalytic activity at very low temperature but they are expensive and could suffer from particle agglomeration and sintering at high operating temperature (Veith, Lupini et al. 2009). Transition metals supported on reducible metal oxides are good substituents catalysts because of their low cost and wide-use along with activities per unit surface area similar to those of noble metal catalysts. They been shown to possess high oxygen release capacity at high range of temperature and have been shown as good candidate materials for oxygen storage and to provide oxygen for combustion and oxidation reaction at high temperature. (Royer and Duprez 2011; Hedayati, Azad et al. 2012; Song, Liu et al. 2013). In particular, supported CuO nanostructures have received a great deal of attention as non-expensive and non-plasmonic catalysts for oxidation reaction. (Caputo, Lisi et al. 2007; Hornes, Hungria et al. 2009; Royer and Duprez 2011; In, Vaughn et al. 2012; Komarneni, Shan et al. 2012; Chen, Xu et al. 2015; Fang, Xing et al. 2015; Kim and Liu 2015) In this study, we have developed a highly stable and active CuO-TiO2 nanocatalyst that can catalyze the CO oxidation at low temperature window between 80–200°C. The CuO-TiO2 nanocatalysts were prepared by the hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2 nanotubes followed by the deposition precipitation of CuO nanoparticles in alkaline conditions. We first prepared the TiO2 nanotube support by the hydrothermal treatment of TiO2 spherical particles in strong alkaline solution at 140°C. We then synthesized a series of CuO-TiO2 catalysts by deposition precipitation at constant pH, with sodium carbonate as the alkali precipitating agent and different loading ratios of Cu to TiO2 between 2% and 30 wt.%. We studied the morphological and structural properties of prepared nanocatalysts using standard physical techniques including SEM, EDX, TEM, TGA, XRD and XPS in order to understand the structure-property relationship and to optimize their catalytic activity. We carried out multiple catalytic CO oxidation cycles in a continuous flow fixed-bed reactor at low temperature range (25–300°C) and studied the catalytic activity of the different CuO-TiO2 nanocatalysts and their stability under stream. We also studied the effect of shape of the TiO2 support and the effect of the mole ratio of CuO loading on the CO conversion rates. The catalytic activity of the single counterparts of CuO and TiO2 were measured for comparison. The experimental results revealed that the CuO nanoparticles supported on TiO2 nanostructures exhibited higher activity and enhanced CO conversion rates at lower temperature, compared to un-supported CuO nanoparticles. The increased activity at lower activation temperature is probably due to the increased degree of dispersion of the active CuO phase on the TiO2 support as concluded from the EDX mapping study. Moreover, the results showed that the correlation between the catalytic activity of CuO-TiO2 nanocatalysts and both the shape and crystalline phase of the TiO2 support. The CuO supported on TiO2 nanotubes demonstarted enhanced CO conversion rates at lower temperature compared to that supported on TiO2 nanospheres. In all samples the CuO-TiO2 nanocatalysts calcined at 400°C exhibited the anatase phase of the TiO2 nanotubes support and demonstrated higher activity. The results also showed that increasing the Cu to Ti ratio could lower the activation temperature needed for CO to CO2 conversion probably due to the enhanced synergetic effect of the two mixed metal oxides. In addition, the XPS study of the CuO-TiO2 composite oxide structure indicated high degree of oxygen deficiency in CuO-TiO2 nanocatalysts with higher Cu to TiO2 loading and this could result in CO oxidation rates. The prepared CuO-TiO2 nanocatalyst demonstrated a high stability for CO oxidation for test periods of up to 5 h under stream at 200°C. The prepared CuO-TiO2 nanocatalysts could have potential applications in hydrogen purification in fuel cell systems and for CO removal in carbon dioxide lasers and in air quality industries.ReferencesCaputo, T., L. Lisi, et al. (2007). “Kinetics of the Preferential Oxidation of CO over CuO/CeO2 Catalysts in H2-Rich Gases.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 46(21): 6793–6800.Chen, G., Q. Xu, et al. (2015). “Facile and Mild Strategy to Construct Mesoporous CeO2-CuO Nanorods with Enhanced Catalytic Activity toward CO Oxidation.” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 7(42): 23538–23544.Fang, B., Y. Xing, et al. (2015). “Hierarchical CuO-TiO2 Hollow Microspheres for Highly Efficient Photodriven Reduction of CO2 to CH4.” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 3(10): 2381–2388.Hedayati, A., A.-M. Azad, et al. (2012). “Evaluation of Novel Ceria-Supported Metal Oxides As Oxygen Carriers for Chemical-Looping Combustion.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 51(39): 12796–12806.Hornes, A., A. B. Hungria, et al. (2009). “Inverse CeO2/CuO Catalyst As an Alternative to Classical Direct Configurations for Preferential Oxidation of CO in Hydrogen-Rich Stream.” Journal of the American Chemical Society 132(1): 34–35.In, S.-I., D. D. Vaughn, et al. (2012). “Hybrid CuO-TiO2 − xNx Hollow Nanocubes for Photocatalytic Conversion of CO2 into Methane under Solar Irradiation.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 51(16): 3915–3918.Kim, H. Y. and P. Liu (2015). “Complex Catalytic Behaviors of CuTiOx Mixed-Oxide during CO Oxidation.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 119(40): 22985–22991.Komarneni, M., J. Shan, et al. (2012). “Adsorption Dynamics of CO on Silica Supported CuOx Clusters: Utilizing Electron Beam Lithography To Study Methanol Synthesis Model Systems.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 116(9): 5792–5801.Royer, S. and D. Duprez (2011). “Catalytic Oxidation of Carbon Monoxide over Transition Metal Oxides.” ChemCatChem 3(1): 24–65.Song, Q., W. Liu, et al. (2013). “A high performance oxygen storage material for chemical looping processes with CO2 capture.” Energy & Environmental Science 6(1): 288–298.Veith, G. M., A. R. Lupini, et al. (2009). “Thermal stability and catalytic activity of gold nanoparticles supported on silica.” Journal of Catalysis 262(1): 92–101.