bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Toxicity syndromes, patient-related clinical indicator of toxicity burden induced by intensive triplet chemotherapy-based regimens in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers.
Authors: Bruera Gemma , Mastropietro Stefania , Dari Salisburgo Luigia , Cosenza Pierluigi , Ricevuto Enrico 
Published: May 2019

e15013 Background: Cancer treatments induce symptoms and signs superimposing on clinical and cancer-related status of individual patient, defining heterogenous toxicity syndromes (TS). We reviewed intensive first line triplet chemotherapy-based regimens developed in fit metastatic gastro-intestinal cancers (mGI), based on FIr/FOx schedule including fluorouracil and weekly alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Methods: Metastatic colorectal (mCRC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), gastric carcinoma (mGC) patients were enrolled by careful decision-making in real life phase II studies: FIr-B/FOx, adding bevacizumab (BEV), in overall, and FIr-C/FOx-C, adding cetuximab (CET), in KRAS/NRAS wild-type mCRC, respectively; FIr/FOx in mPDAC; FD/FOx, adding docetaxel (D), in mGC. Toxicity, and individual limiting toxicity syndromes (LTS), classified as limiting toxicity alone (LTS-single site, LTS-ss) or associated to other limiting or G2 toxicities (LTS-multiple sites, LTS-ms) were evaluated and compared by chi-square test. Results: FIr-B/FOx and FIr-C/FOx-C in mCRC, FIr/FOx in mPDAC, FD/FOx in mGC, respectively reported activity, efficacy and limiting toxicities similar to other triplet chemotherapy-based regimens. Reported LTS: FIr-B/FOx in mCRC 44%, LTS-ms 24% and LTS-ss 20%, in young elderly (yE) 46%, LTS-ms significantly increased vs LTS-ss; FIr-C/FOx-C in KRAS/NRAS wild-type mCRC 65.5%, significantly increased LTS-ms vs LTS-ss, in yE 83%; FIr/FOx in mPDAC 27.5%, mostly LTS-ms, in yE 38.4% all LTS-ms; FD/FOx in mGC 30%, all LTS-ms, in yE 25%. Conclusions: LTS meet the need of an innovative clinical parameter of patient-related toxicity burden, indicating global and individual tolerability, including differential spectrum and intensities of TS related to cancer treatment and according to clinical status of the individual patient. LTS integrated with conventional toxicity evaluation may help properly select patients fit for intensive medical treatments in mGI cancers.
HD204: Analytical biocomparability and clinical trial I progression of bevacizumab.
Authors: hii Jocelyn , Pivot Xavier , Park Lisa Soyeon , Kim Michael , Feyaerts Peggy , Chan Kuo Wei , Lee Jeong-Hyeon , Ang Felicia , Demarchi Martin , Coliat Pierre , Barthelemy Philippe , Ben Abdelghani Meher 
Published: May 2019

e15014 Background: Prestige Biopharma Pte Ltd is developing HD204, a biosimilar of the EU-approved and US-licensed Bevacizumab (Avastin) that is approved treatment for a variety of tumour types. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG1) that binds to soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), thus prevent interaction with VEGF receptors. Due to heterogeneity nature of antibody drug, extensive characterization of antibody from physicochemical and biological properties using multiple bioanalytical assays is required. The development of HD204 from analytical biocomparability to clinical trial I are demonstrated. Methods: Analytical biocomparability in physiocochemical and biological properties of HD204 was compared to Avastin sourced from EU and US using multiple bioanalytical assays as below. Clinical phase I (SAMSON), a randomized, double-blind, single dose and 3-way parallel group was initiated recently to compare pharmacokinetic and to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of HD204, EU-Avastin and US-Avastin. Approximately 120 healthy human subjects (assigned to 3 treatment group) was administered with a single intravenous infusion of 1 mg/kg of either HD204, EU- and US-Avastin. Results: HD204 shows equivalent in physicochemical and biological properties compared to EU- and US-Herceptin. For phase I study, patient recruitment was completed with treatment for come patients initiated but still ongoing. Conclusions: HD204 was shown to be equivalent in all parameters in the analytical biocomparability testing. Clinical Phase 1 trial (SAMSON) is ongoing on and key data from SAMSON trial will be reported in ASCO meeting. [Table: see text]
A phase II study of apatinib combined with S-1 in previously treated refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Authors: Li Ning , Deng Wenying , Zhang Guifang , Guo Yanwei , Ma Yijie , Wu Qiong , Yang Xinyi , Luo Suxia 
Published: May 2019

e15016 Background: Although regorafenib and fruquintinib have been recommended as the third-line treatment for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the median survival time of mCRC is still only for 4-8 months and the low response rate and unpleasant side effects limit their use in Chinese patients. Apatinib, an oral VEGFR-2 inhibitor, has been approved as a third line treatment in metastatic gastric cancer. In addition, apatinib has demonstrated good safety, tolerability, and efficacy in the treatment of advanced solid tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 in the treatment of refractory mCRC. Methods: In this prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II study, patients after failure of second-line chemotherapy were enrolled and took apatinib (250mg, daily) combined with S-1 (standard dose). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) and the second endpoint was response rate and overall survival time. Results: From December 2017, 22 patients (14 male) with a median age of 56y (range: 34-71 y) were enrolled and eligible for evaluation of the PFS, response rate and safety. The median PFS was 105d (95% CI: 79.01-130.98). two patients (9%) achieved partial response, 15 (68.18%) achieved stable disease, and 5 (22.72%) were progressive disease. The objective response rate and the disease control rate were 9% and 77.27%, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached. The common adverse effects were abnormal liver function (7/22; 31.81%), leukopenia (5/22; 22.72%) and thrombocytopenia (4/22; 18.18%). The incidence for grade 3-4 side effect was very low. One patient experienced grade 3 proteinuria and there were no toxic deaths. Conclusions: This preliminary result indicated that apatinib combined with S-1 may extend the PFS in mCRC, with well-tolerated toxicities, making it a promising therapeutic target for mCRC treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03397199 .
Survival after primary liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: A comparative analysis of the LICC trial with historical controls (FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial and EORTC Intergroup trial 40983).
Authors: Schimanski Carl Christoph , Kasper Stefan , Hegewisch-Becker Susanna , Schroeder Jan , Overkamp Friedrich , Kullmann Frank , Bechstein Wolf Otto , Voehringer Matthias , Oellinger Robert , Lordick Florian , Heinemann Volker , Geissler Michael , Schulz-Abelius Armin , Linz Bernhard , Bernhard Helga , Potthoff Karin , Schmidtmann Irene , Moehler Markus Hermann 
Published: May 2019

e15019 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) with liver-limited disease (LLD) have a chance of long-term survival and cure after hepatic metastasectomy. The optimal treatment after primary liver resection remains controversial. Here we compare results from the LICC trial with historical controls, the FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial (FFCD; Portier et al., 2006) and the EORTC Intergroup trial 40983 (EORTC; Nordlinger et al., 2008, 2013). The three trials investigated pts with mCRC LLD who underwent primary hepatic resection. Methods: LICC, FFCD and EORTC were compared regarding pts characteristics, treatment, surveillance and efficacy outcomes. LICC pts received the adjuvant antigen-specific cancer vaccine tecemotide (L-BLP25) or placebo after primary LLD resection for up to 2 years. The FFCD trial compared postoperative 5-FU/leucovorin and the EORTC trial perioperative FOLFOX versus surgery alone. Results: Primary resected pts in LICC (n = 80; R0 n = 76), FFCD (R0 n = 171; postoperative chemotherapy n = 86) and EORTC (n = 364) showed different pt characteristics concerning median age (60, 63 and 63 years) and rate of synchronous metastases (46.8%, 27.9% and 34.0%). In LICC, > 5 liver metastases were resected in 11.6% of pts, in FFCD and EORTC all eligible pts had < 5 liver metastases resected. In contrast to EORTC, LICC and FFCD had a close surveillance until recurrence or a maximum of 2 years. Median OS (mOS) in LICC was not yet estimable in primary resected pts (tecemotide arm: 62.8 months; placebo arm: not yet estimable). In the FFCD and the EORTC trial, mOS was 62.1 and 61.3 months, respectively. Further details will be presented. Conclusions: Despite unfavorable disease characteristic in LICC compared with the earlier EORTC and FFCD studies, primary liver resection without adjuvant chemotherapy led to surprisingly good survival outcomes. Improvements in imaging-based pt selection and liver resection techniques might in part explain our finding. Surgery alone appears to be an option for selected pts with resectable LLD. Better systemic chemo(immune-)therapy may have also contributed to the OS benefit. Clinical trial information: LICC: NCT01462513; EORTC: NCT00006479; FFCD: not registered.
A phase ib trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of quinacrine plus capecitabine in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Authors: Winer Arthur , Vijayvergia Namrata , Cohen Steven J. , Denlinger Crystal S. , Astsaturov Igor A. , Dotan Efrat , Gallant Jean-Nicolas , Wang Edward W , Kunkel Miriam , Lim Bora , Harvey Harold A. , Sivik Jeffrey Michael , Zhou Lanlan , Korzekwa Kenneth , Ruth Karen , Ross Eric A. , El-Deiry Wafik S. 
Published: May 2019

e15020 Background: Acridines emerged from a cell-based screen for p53-pathway restoring compounds. Quinacrine, an acridine demonstrating p53 pathway restoration properties, displayed preclinical anti-tumor effects when used as monotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) cell culture and in vivo xenografts. Quinacrine suppresses survival pathways by inhibiting Mcl-1 expression, NFkB, STAT3, and angiogenesis. The combination of quinacrine plus 5-FU showed in-vivo preclinical efficacy against CRC with mutant KRAS, BRAF, or p53. Capecitabine, an oral 5-FU prodrug, is FDA-approved to treat metastatic (m)CRC. This phase I trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of quinacrine plus capecitabine in patients with refractory mCRC. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with histologically confirmed mCRC refractory to standard therapy or with no standard therapy options available were eligible for the study. Using a modified 4B Simon’s accelerated titration design, patients were treated with a fixed dose of capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily (bid) for 14 days of a 21-day cycle, and escalating doses of quinacrine 100 mg daily, 100 mg bid, and 200 mg bid for 21 days. The primary endpoint was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of quinacrine in combination with capecitabine and to determine their tolerability and safety. Results: Ten patients were enrolled, median age 60-years old (range: 56-79). Quinacrine 100 mg daily and 100 mg bid were well tolerated by the first two patients. Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) were seen in 3 patients treated with quinacrine 200 mg bid and included hyperbilirubinemia, transaminitis, increased alkaline phosphatase, hypokalemia, diarrhea, vomiting, and dehydration. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were seen. 5 additional patients tolerated treatment with quinacrine 100 mg bid and capecitabine without further DLTs making this the MTD. The median time on treatment was 63 days. Three patients came off study prior to their first response evaluation. In 7 patients evaluable for response, 4 had stable disease (57%), while 3 (43%) had disease progression. Median overall survival was 196.5 days. Conclusions: Capecitabine and quinacrine can be safely administered at the MTD of capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 PO bid D1-14 and quinacrine 100 mg PO bid D1-21 of a 21-day cycle for patients with mCRC. A phase II study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01844076.
Investigation of an ethnic predisposition to developing brain metastases (BM) in Asian patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
Authors: McGovern Kerri , Rodriguez Teresa , Smith Melissa H , Maloney Antonia , Saif Wasif M. 
Published: May 2019

e15023 Background: CRC, the third most common cancer in the United States, carries racial/ethnic disparities in both incidence and mortality. With availability of effective systemic therapies, the life of CRC patients can be prolonged which thereby increases the risk of metastases at uncommon sites, such as the brain. We report our investigation into the impact of race/ethnicity on the incidence of BM in CRC patients using retrospective data (2010 – 2018) at a single institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with CRC and collected data on age, race/ethnicity, stage, treatment modalities, metastatic sites, and survival. Race and ethnicity were defined in accordance with federal standards set by the U.S. Census. Following this, race/ethnicity was self-declared and/or based on the primary language declared and categorized as non-Hispanic White, Hispanic White, non–Hispanic Black, Asian, or Unknown/Other. CRC location was classified as right-sided, left-sided or rectal. Results: We identified 264 CRC patients (median age: 61; range: 38 - 99). Among them 123 identified as non-Hispanic white, 28 non-Hispanic black, 26 Hispanic white, and 9 declared Other. There were 76 (29%) who identified as Asian. Of those 76 patients, 5 (7%) developed BM. All 5 patients were male and stage IV at initial diagnosis. BM was a late stage phenomenon with rectal primary and lung metastases seemly associated with an increased risk in the specific cohort. Molecular markers such as KRAS were available in 3 patients without clear association. Median time to development of BM was 29 months (range: 26 - 33). Median overall survival after BM diagnosis was 5.5 months (range: 4 - 11). Overall survival was longest for the patient who had both radiation and surgery. Conclusions: Our study showed an incidence of BM of 7% in the Asian sub-population compared to the historical control of 0.6 – 3.2% in the overall population. These results at the least warrant further investigation in a larger patient population of BM in CRC patients with emphasis on molecular markers. Recognition of BM in CRC patients is clinically relevant secondary to multiple lines of therapy as mentioned earlier and its grave impact on outcome.
Correlation of histopathologic regression with progression free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with RAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) under fluorouracil/folinic acid, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) plus panitumumab (pmab) or FOLFOXIRI alone: Subgroup analysis of VOLFI (AIO-KRK-0109).
Authors: Noepel-Duennebacke Stefanie , Juette Hendrik , Lugnier Celine , Geissler Michael , Martens Uwe Marc , Heinemann Volker , Held Swantje , Klaassen-Mielke Renate , Modest Dominik Paul , Reinacher-Schick Anke C. , Seufferlein Thomas , Tannapfel Andrea 
Published: May 2019

e15024 Background: We recently demonstrated improved objective response rate in untreated all-RAS wildtype mCRC with the addition of the anti-EGFR-antibody pmab to FOLFOXIRI. In this subgroup analysis we focused on histopathological response as a predictive marker for PFS. Additionally we analyzed chemotherapy induced steatosis hepatitis (CASH) in both treatment arms. Methods: Tissue samples from pts. achieving secondary resection of liver metastases in VOLFI were analyzed. We defined a cut-off for very good histopathological response at 20% of residual tumor cells in proportion to the total tumor area. For CASH sinusoidal obstructive syndrome, ballooning, steatosis, cholestasis, fibrosis and inflammation were determined. PFS was estimated using LIFETEST procedure. Results: Tissue of 14/19 resected pts. was evaluable (pmab-FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI: 11/3). All showed partial remission by RECIST. Median age was 56 yrs. (32–67), male/female: 7/7. All primary tumors were located in the left colon. Molecular analysis detected 1 BRAF (V600E) mutation and 1 MSI-H tumor. Median treatment duration until resection in this cohort: pmab-FOLFOXIRI 7 cycles (3-12)/FOLFOXIRI 9.5 cycles (7-11).7 pts. achieved very good histopathological response with vital tumor cells ≤20% (pmab-FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI 5/2) and 7 pts. showed vital tumor cells >20% (pmab-FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI 6/1). The cut-off correlated with an improved PFS in the group ≤20 vs >20% (median PFS 12.40; confidence interval (CI) 6.43-51.22 vs PFS 9.88; CI 6.17-15.26 months). The severity of CASH was not increased by the addition of pmab. Conclusions: In this preliminary analysis of VOLFI histopathological response seems to correlate with a better PFS after secondary resection of liver metastases. There was no relevant difference in CASH between pmab-FOLFOXIRI vs. FOLFOXIRI alone. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01328171. Clinical trial information: AIO-KRK-0109.
Survival after secondary liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: A comparative analysis of the LICC trial with historical controls (CELIM, FIRE-3).
Authors: Moehler Markus Hermann , Folprecht Gunnar , Heinemann Volker , Holch Julian , Maderer Annett , Kasper Stefan , Hegewisch-Becker Susanna , Schroeder Jan , Overkamp Friedrich , Kullmann Frank , Bechstein Wolf Otto , Voehringer Matthias , Oellinger Robert , Lordick Florian , Geissler Michael , Schulz-Abelius Armin , Linz Bernhard , Bernhard Helga , Schmidtmann Irene , Schimanski Carl Christoph 
Published: May 2019

e15025 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) with liver-limited disease (LLD) have a chance of long-term overall survival (OS) and potential cure after complete hepatic metastasectomy. The appropriate postoperative treatment strategy is still controversial. L-BLP25 as antigen-specific cancer vaccine targeting mucin 1 (MUC1) was recently evaluated as adjuvant therapy in mCRC pts after R0/R1 LLD resection (LICC trial, NCT01462513). Here we compared the LICC surveillance program and efficacy results for secondarily resected LLD pts versus historical controls, i.e. the CELIM trial (Folprecht et al, Ann Oncol 2014) of potentially resectable LLD mCRC pts and a FIRE-3-LLD subgroup (Holch et al, Int J Cancer 2018). Methods: LICC, CELIM and FIRE-3-LLD subgroup pts with stage IV mCRC limited to liver metastases who underwent hepatic resection (R0 or R1) were compared regarding pts characteristics, surveillance and efficacy outcome. LICC pts received adjuvant L-BLP25 or placebo after secondary LLD resection as 8 weekly doses, followed by 6 week maintenance intervals and tight surveillance until recurrence or a maximum of 2 years. Results: In LICC, 41 /121 pts (33.9%) were secondarily resected, and R0 resection was achieved in 31 pts (75.6%). In CELIM, 36/106 pts (34%) with primary unresectable LLD were secondarily R0 resected. In FIRE-3-LLD, secondary resection was feasible for 29/133 pts (21.8%). After R0 resection, median recurrence free survival (mRFS) was 8.9 months in LICC, 9.9 months in CELIM and 11.5/ 12.4 months in FIRE-3-LLD in either treatment arm. In the LICC trial, median overall survival (mOS) in secondarily resected pts was 65.1 months, with 38.3 months for the R1 and is not yet reached for the R0 subgroup. In CELIM, mOS was 53.9 months for R0 resected pts. In FIRE-3-LLD, after secondary resection mOS was 56.2 months. Median age was about 5 years less in LICC. Further details will be presented. Conclusions: Secondary resected pts of LICC, CELIM and FIRE-3 showed impressive median OS with better OS for LICC and a younger patient cohort. The established tight LICC surveillance program after surgery might have had a positive impact on survival. Clinical trial information: LICC: NCT01462513; FIRE-3: NCT00433927; CELIM: NCT00153998.
Circulating tumor DNA-based mutational landscape of advanced colorectal cancer.
Authors: Yan Fang , Gao Wei , Zhu Lifei , Xie Wenzhuan , Gao Chan , Zhao Jing , Huang Mengli , Cai Shangli , Zhong Yi 
Published: May 2019

e15034 Background: Alterations in oncogenic driver genes are extensively tested to guide anticancer treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC). As the repertoire of therapeutic targets continue to grow, we are interested to interrogate the possibility of resorting to circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) where tissue samples are not readily available. Methods: Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on ctDNA obtained from patients with advanced CRC using a 150-gene panel. Mutational profiles of ctDNA were compared with those detected in tissue samples from the 3D Medicine database as well as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Genomic aberrations such as single nucleotide variations (SNVs), insertions/deletions, copy number variations, gene rearrangement and fusions were analyzed. Results: Notably, 244 of 256 samples (95.3%) were ctDNA-positive, as indicated by a maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF) of > 0%. At least one reportable genomic alteration was detected in 96.5% of all cases, with an average of 8.12 mutations per case. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (47%), APC (42%), KRAS (32%) in ctDNA. A similar trend was also observed for SNVs, where TP53 (46.9% vs. 77.6% vs. 53.8%), APC (41.8% vs. 66.0% vs. 73.0%), and KRAS (30.5% vs. 48.4% vs. 43.5%) had the highest mutation frequencies across three data sets (ctDNA, tissues and the TCGA database). The SNV profiles of therapeutically relevant genes for CRC were also largely consistent between ctDNA and the tissue samples included in the 3D Medicine database: BRAF (7.0% vs. 8.7%), KRAS (30.5% vs. 48.4%), NRAS (2.7 vs. 3.1%), ERBB2 (5.1% vs. 5.2%), MLH1 (0.8% vs. 2.9%), MSH2 (2.7% vs. 3.1%), and MSH6 (3.1% vs. 3.7%). Patients harboring copy number gains had a significantly higher level of MSAF than those free of gene amplifications (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Mutational landscape of ctDNA in general correlated with that detected in prior tissue samples as well as the TCGA database, supporting a role for ctDNA testing as a complementary approach to tissue testing in CRC.