Abstract A21: Characterization of the immune environment in the in situ to invasive breast carcinoma transition
Authors: Alcazar Carlos R. Gil del , Huh SungJin , Ekram Muhammad B. , Trinh Anne , Liu Lin L. , Beca Francisco , Xiaoyuan Zi , Kwak Misuk , Bergholtz Helga , Su Ying , Ding Lina , Russnes Hege G. , Richardson Andrea L. , Babski Kirsten , Kim Elizabeth Min Hui , McDonnell Charles H. , Wagner Jon , Rowberry Ron , Freeman Gordon J. , Dillon Deborah , Sorlie Therese , Coussens Lisa M. , Garber Judy E. , Fan Rong , Bobolis Kristie , Allred D. Craig , Jeong Joon , Park So Yeon , Michor Franziska , Polyak Kornelia 
Published: August 2018

Abstract
Reactivation of immune responses against cancer cells—immunotherapy—is one of the few cancer therapies that can successfully eliminate even metastatic disease in a relatively nontoxic manner. However, its success has been limited to a subset of patients. For example, in breast cancer only ~20% of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients benefit from anti-PDL1 therapy. One reason for this limited success can be that different tumors evade the immune system via different mechanisms, which suggests that they may respond to different types of immunotherapies. Epithelial cancer cells in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are physically separated from the tumor-infiltrating leukocytes by the myoepithelial cell layer and the basement membrane, whereas in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), the epithelial cancer cells are intermingled with leukocytes. Therefore, we hypothesize that the DCIS to IDC transition is a key step in tumor progression as cancer cells are under different selection pressures, and only those that can evade the immune system can continue tumor progression, hence shaping subsequent tumor evolution. To dissect the role of leukocytes in the DCIS to IDC transition, we began by analyzing the composition and molecular profiles of leukocytes, with special emphasis on T cells, in normal breast tissues, DCIS, and IDC. We found that the relative frequency of leukocytes increases during tumor progression but the CD8/CD4 T cell ratio decreases. In addition, the gene expression profile of CD45+CD3+ T cells is different in DCIS compared to those isolated from normal breast tissue and IDCs. We found that gene set signatures corresponding to CD8+ T cells and NKT cells were enriched over regulatory T-cell signatures in DCIS compared to IDC. This result suggested that DCIS had a more activated immune environment compared to IDC. We further examined T-cell activation by immunofluorescence (IF) analysis and found a higher percentage of activated GZMB+CD8+ T cells in DCIS compared to IDC including a set of matched DCIS and locally recurrent IDC. We also found that the TCR clonotype was more diverse in DCIS than in IDCs. Interestingly, we detected a few relatively frequent clones that were shared among different DCIS patients, one of which was previously shown to recognize a protein from the Epstein-Bar virus. In order to dissect mechanisms of immune evasion in IDC, we analyzed immune checkpoint genes and proteins by FISH and IF. We found that TIGIT+ T cells were slightly more frequent in DCIS than in IDC. In triple-negative IDC, there was high expression of PD-L1 in epithelial cells and in 3/10 cases amplification of CD274 (encoding PD-L1), whereas DCIS had lower expression of PD-L1 and no amplification of CD274. To further elucidate mechanisms of immune evasion, we explored the significance of a cluster of genes encoding several chemokines that are located in close proximity of ERBB2 (encoding HER2). When analyzing the HER2+ samples from the TCGA, we found that coamplification of the 17q12 chemokine cluster (CC) with ERBB2 was enriched in HER2+ER+ luminal-like tumors, whereas there was either no gain or loss of the cluster in the HER2+ER breast tumors. Interestingly, we found higher expression of both T-cell activation and exhaustion-related genes in tumors that lack CC gain. Moreover, when assessing a cohort of HER2+ samples by multicolor FISH and IF, we found an inverse correlation between CC amplification and activation of CD8+ T cells. There was no correlation between CC amplification and recruitment of macrophages or myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Overall our results show coevolution of cancer cells and the immune microenvironment during tumor progression.
Citation Format: Carlos R. Gil del Alcazar, SungJin Huh, Muhammad B. Ekram, Anne Trinh, Lin L. Liu, Francisco Beca, Zi Xiaoyuan, Misuk Kwak, Helga Bergholtz, Ying Su, Lina Ding, Hege G. Russnes, Andrea L. Richardson, Kirsten Babski, Elizabeth Min Hui Kim, Charles H. McDonnell, III, Jon Wagner, Ron Rowberry, Gordon J. Freeman, Deborah Dillon, Therese Sorlie, Lisa M. Coussens, Judy E. Garber, Rong Fan, Kristie Bobolis, D. Craig Allred, Joon Jeong, So Yeon Park, Franziska Michor, Kornelia Polyak. Characterization of the immune environment in the in situ to invasive breast carcinoma transition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Breast Cancer Research; 2017 Oct 7-10; Hollywood, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2018;16(8_Suppl):Abstract nr A21.