Limited marginal utility of deep sequencing for HIV drug resistance testing in the age of integrase inhibitors
Authors: Dalmat Ronit , Makhsous Negar , Pepper Gregory , Magaret Amalia , Jerome Keith R. , Wald Anna , Greninger Alexander L. 
Published: September 2018

AbstractHIV drug resistance genotyping is a critical tool in the clinical management of HIV infections. Although resistance genotyping has traditionally been conducted using Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is emerging as a powerful tool due to its ability to detect lower frequency alleles. However, the value added from NGS approaches to antiviral resistance testing remains to be demonstrated. We compared the variant detection capacity of NGS versus Sanger sequencing methods for resistance genotyping of 144 drug resistance tests (105 protease-reverse transcriptase tests and 39 integrase tests) submitted to our clinical virology laboratory over a four-month period in 2016 for Sanger-based HIV drug resistance testing. NGS detected all true high frequency drug resistance mutations (>20% frequency) found by Sanger sequencing, with greater accuracy in one instance of a Sanger-detected false positive. Freely available online NGS variant callers Hydra and PASeq were superior to Sanger methods for interpretations of allele linkage and automated variant calling. NGS additionally detected low frequency mutations (1-20% frequency) associated with higher levels of drug resistance in 30/105 (29%) of protease-reverse transcriptase tests and 4/39 (10%) of integrase tests. Clinical follow-up of 69 individuals for a median of 674 days found no difference in rates of virological failure between individuals with and without low frequency mutations, although rates of virological failure were higher for individuals with drug-relevant low frequency mutations. However, all 27 individuals who experienced virological failure reported poor adherence to their drug regimen during preceding follow-up time, and all 19 who subsequently improved their adherence achieved viral suppression at later time points consistent with a lack of clinical resistance. In conclusion, in a population with low antiviral resistance emergence, NGS methods detected numerous instances of minor alleles that did not result in subsequent bona fide virological failure due to antiviral resistance.ImportanceGenotypic antiviral resistance testing for HIV is an essential component of the clinical microbiology and virology laboratory. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a powerful tool for the detection of low frequency sequence variants (allele frequencies <20%). Whether detecting these low frequency mutations in HIV contributes to improved patient health, however, remains unclear. We compared NGS to conventional Sanger sequencing for detecting resistance mutations for 144 HIV drug resistance tests submitted to our clinical virology laboratory and detected low frequency mutations in 24% of tests. Over approximately two years of follow-up for 69 patients for which we had access to electronic health records, no patients had virological failure due to antiviral resistance. Instead, virological failure was entirely explained by medication non-adherence. While larger studies are required, we suggest that detection of low frequency variants by NGS presents limited marginal clinical utility when compared to standard of care.