Predicting compressive stress‒strain curves of structural adobe cubes based on Acoustic Emission (AE) hits and Weibull distribution
Authors: FaghihKhorasani Fatemeh , Kabir Mohammad Zaman , AhmadiNajafabad Mehdi , Ghavami Khosrow 
Published: August 2019

Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to provide a method to predict the situation of a loaded element in the compressive stress curve to prevent failure of crucial elements in load-bearing masonry walls and to propose a material model to simulate a compressive element successfully in Abaqus software to study the structural safety by using non-linear finite element analysis.

Design/methodology/approach
A Weibull distribution function was rewritten to relate between failure probability function and axial strain during uniaxial compressive loading. Weibull distribution parameters (shape and scale parameters) were defined by detected acoustic emission (AE) events with a linear regression. It was shown that the shape parameter of Weibull distribution was able to illustrate the effects of the added fibers on increasing or decreasing the specimens’ brittleness. Since both Weibull function and compressive stress are functions of compressive strain, a relation between compressive stress and normalized cumulative AE hits was calculated when the compressive strain was available. By suggested procedures, it was possible to monitor pretested plain or random distributed short fibers reinforced adobe elements (with AE sensor and strain detector) in a masonry building under uniaxial compression loading to predict the situation of element in the compressive stress‒strain curve, hence predicting the time to element collapse by an AE sensor and a strain detector. In the predicted compressive stress‒strain curve, the peak stress and its corresponding strain, the stress and strain point with maximum elastic modulus and the maximum elastic modulus were predicted successfully. With a proposed material model, it was illustrated that the needed parameters for simulating a specimen in Abaqus software with concrete damage plasticity were peak stress and its corresponding strain, the stress and strain point with maximum elastic modulus and the maximum elastic modulus.

Findings
The AE cumulative hits versus strain plots corresponding to the stress‒strain curves can be divided into four stages: inactivity period, discontinuous growth period, continuous growth period and constant period, which can predict the densifying, linear, non-linear and residual stress part of the stress‒strain relationship. By supposing that the relation between cumulative AE hits and compressive strain complies with a Weibull distribution function, a linear analysis was conducted to calibrate the parameters of Weibull distribution by AE cumulative hits for predicting the failure probability as a function of compressive strain. Parameters of m and θ were able to predict the brittleness of the plain and tire fibers reinforced adobe elements successfully. The calibrated failure probability function showed sufficient representation of the cumulative AE hit curve. A mathematical model for the stress–strain relationship prediction of the specimens after detecting the first AE hit was developed by the relationship between compressive stress versus the Weibull failure probability function, which was validated against the experimental data and gave good predictions for both plain and short fibers reinforced adobe specimens. Then, the authors were able to monitor and predict the situation of an element in the compressive stress‒strain curve, hence predicting the time to its collapse for pretested plain or random distributed short fibers reinforced adobe (with AE sensor and strain detector) in a masonry building under uniaxial compression loading by an AE sensor and a strain detector. The proposed model was successfully able to predict the main mechanical properties of different adobe specimens which are necessary for material modeling with concrete damage plasticity in Abaqus. These properties include peak compressive strength and its corresponding axial strain, the compressive strength and its corresponding axial strain at the point with maximum compressive Young’s modulus and the maximum compressive Young’s modulus.

Research limitations/implications
The authors were not able to decide about the effects of the specimens’ shape, as only cubic specimens were chosen; by testing different shape and different size specimens, the authors would be able to generalize the results.

Practical implications
The paper includes implications for monitoring techniques and predicting the time to the collapse of pretested elements (with AE sensor and strain detector) in a masonry structure.

Originality/value
This paper proposes a new method to monitor and predict the situation of a loaded element in the compressive stress‒strain curve, hence predicting the time to its collapse for pretested plain or random distributed short fibers reinforced adobe (with AE sensor and strain detector) in a masonry building under uniaxial compression load by an AE sensor and a strain detector.