A Prospective Cohort Study of Biologic and Chronologic Aging in 106 Patients with Age and Context-Relevant Clonal Hematopoiesis
Authors: Li Marissa , Fernandez Jenna A. , Kirschner Kristina , Chandra Tamir , McCullough Kristen B. , Aug Sarah , Lasho Terra L. , Finke Christy , Gangat Naseema , Mangaonkar Abhishek A. , Simon Rachel A , Ferrer Alejandro , Patnaik Mrinal M. , Foran James M. , Arana Yi Cecilia Y. , Kusne Yael , Badar Talha 
Published: December 2024

Background: Age-related clonal hematopoiesis (ARCH) is a precursor state to blood cancers and is associated with epigenetic age acceleration (EpiAgeAccel) (Aging Cell, 2021). While ARCH in combination with AgeAccel has the highest risk for all cause mortality and cardiovascular disease, not much is known about context-relevant clonal hematopoiesis (CRCH) - CH occurring in the context of prior chemo/radiation, bone marrow failure and germline predisposition syndromes. CRCH has a unique mutational signature enriched in genes in DNA damage response and repair (TP53 and PPM1D). To answer this question, we assessed EpiAge in a prospective cohort of patients with both ARCH and CRCH.
Methods: Patients were prospectively recruited for CH and EpiAge assessment from the Mayo Clinic CH clinic between 2022 and 2024. Demographic and clinical data including chronologic age, BMI, sex, blood counts, and medical history were recorded at the time of enrollment. CH status was determined using error corrected sequencing on peripheral blood (PB) DNA. All somatic variants with a variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥0.5% were considered as CH. For EpiAge analysis PB DNA was analyzed using the Illumina MethylationEPIC array. The resulting beta values were used to obtain epigenetic age estimates using Horvath's clock (Genome Biol., 2013), Hannum's Clock (Mol Cell., 2013), PhenoAge (Aging, 2018), DunedinPACE (eLife, 2022), and predicted telomere length (Aging, 2019).
Results: 106 (62%) of 170 patients assessed were found to have CH, with the most frequent mutations being TET2 (19%), PPM1D (17%), DNMT3A (16%), ASXL1 (9%), and TP53 (6%); median VAF 9.5%. Except for a higher median chronologic age (68 vs 60 years, p&lt;0.001) in the CH group, baseline characteristics including BMI, comorbidities, baseline blood counts, sex and tobacco use history were similar between the two groups. The CH group demonstrated significant EpiAgeAccel by all three clocks: Horvath (p=0.001), Hannum (p&lt;0.001), and PhenoAge (p&lt;0.001); with an increase in biological age of 4.9 years (95% CI 2-7.7) by Horvath clock, 4.8 years (95% CI 2.2-7.5) by Hannum clock, and 7 years (95% CI 2.9-10.5) by PhenoAge, after adjusting for chronologic age, sex, smoking status, and cancer history. CH was also associated with increased DunedinPACE of aging by 0.13 biological year per chronologic year (bioyear/chronoyear) (95% CI 0.06-0.2, p&lt;0.001), and shortened telomere lengths by 0.24kb (95% CI 0.11-0.35, p&lt;0.001) after adjusting for chronologic age and excluding patients with telomere biology disorders.
CH patients were then further classified into ARCH-63 (59%) and CRCH-43 (41%). While the median chronological age (69 vs 67 years) was similar between the 2 groups, CRCH patients had lower Hgb [10.9g/dL vs. 13g/dL (p=0.0001)] , lower platelet [146x109/L vs. 192x109/L (p=0.0132)] and lower WBC [4.4x109/L vs. 5.2x109/L (p=0.0345)]. The median BMI, comorbidities, and tobacco use history were similar between the 2 groups. The 3 most common ARCH mutations were TET2 (20%), DNMT3A (19%), and ASXL1 (14%), while, PPM1D (27%), TET2 (18%), and DNMT3A (14%) were frequent in CRCH. There was no significant difference found in median EpiAge via Horvath (68 vs 67.5years p=0.2826), Hannum (65 vs 66 years p=0.9333), or PhenoAge (55 vs 56 years p=0.618) between ARCH and CRCH. However, DunedinPACE of aging was higher in CRCH (1.27 vs 1.18 bioyear/chronoyear p=0.0148) and median telomere length was shorter in CRCH (6.35 vs 6.49kb p=0.0247), in comparison to ARCH.
Multivariable regression analysis was completed for both ARCH and CRCH compared to non-CH, adjusting for chronologic age, smoking status, and male sex. While both ARCH and CRCH demonstrated EpiAgeAccel via Horvath(5.8years p=0.0001, 3.4 years p=0.051), Hannum(5years p=0.001, 4.5 years p=0.007), and PhenoAge (6.7years p=0.002, 7.6 years p=0.002) clocks, CRCH more than doubled DunedinPACE (0.2 bioyear/chronoyear, p&lt;0.001) of aging compared to ARCH (0.08 bioyear/chronoyear, p=0.026). CRCH also demonstrated double the decrease in telomere length (0.34kb, p&lt;0.001) compared to ARCH (0.17kb, p=0.015).
Conclusion: Our prospective CH cohort study validates the association between CH and EpiAgeAccel using several different methylation clocks and for the first time, highlights increased pace of aging and shorter telomere lengths in CRCH versus ARCH. Correlations with cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes are ongoing.