bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing multiple self-expandable metallic stent placement by stent in stent technique for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.
Authors: MO Jinwon , Kim Jie-Hyun , Shin Seung Yong , Jung Da Hyun , Park Jae Jun , Youn Young Hoon , Park Hyojin 
Published: January 2019

88 Background: Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely used for relieving the obstructive symptoms of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). The aims were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple gastroduodenal stent placement by stent in stent technique and identify predictive factors about stent patency. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 170 patients with GOO receiving SEMS by stent in stent technique from July 2006 to July 2018. Among them, 90 patients had been treated with gastroduodenal SEMS placement for MGOO. Technical and clinical success rates were evaluated. And, clinical outcomes with predictors of stent patency were also analyzed. Results: Among the subjects, 34.4% were treated with secondary SEMS placement, and 9.7% were treated with third SEMS placement because of the previous stent dysfunction. The median stent patency time was 15.7 weeks (range 0-89) in the first SEMS, 10.4 weeks (range 0-44) in the second SEMS, and 11.3 weeks (range 1-29) in the third SEMS. The technical and clinical success rate were 100% and 97.8% in the first SEMS, 100% and 90.3% in the second SEMS, 100% and 100% in the third SEMS. In multivariable analysis, the first SEMS placement of covered type including Comvi stent was correlated with prolonged stent patency (OR 4.549, P = 0.001). And both chemotherapy after the first SEMS placement (OR 8.248, P = 0.006) and chemotherapy after the second SEMS placement (OR 7.467, P = 0.003) were correlated with prolonged stent patency. Serious complications such as gastrointestinal hemorrhage or perforation did not occur in any patient. Conclusions: Secondary and third gastroduodenal SEMS placement by stent in stent technique is a safe and effective treatment for the first stent dysfunction in MGOO. The stent placement of covered type and chemotherapy after stent placement is the predictor of stent patency. Keywords: Malignant gastric outlet obstruction, Self-expandable metallic stent, Stent in stent technique, Stent patency, Predictive factor
Phase I results from the phase 1/3 FIGHT study evaluating bemarituzumab and mFOLFOX6 in advanced gastric/GEJ cancer (GC).
Authors: Tejani Mohamedtaki Abdulaziz , Cheung Eric , Eisenberg Peter D. , Scott Aaron James , Tesfaye Anteneh A. , Dreiling Lyndah , Eng Clarence , Marina Neyssa , Mitra Siddhartha , Xiang Hong , Yan Xiaohong , Catenacci Daniel V.T. 
Published: January 2019

91 Background: GC with FGFR2b overexpression or FGFR2 amplification is associated with a poor prognosis. Bemarituzumab (bema, FPA144) is a first-in-class humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively blocks FGFR2b and triggers antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. With favorable safety and activity as a single agent in 2L+ patients with FGFR2b+ GC, the global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled FIGHT study (NCT03343301) is evaluating the front-line combination of bema with mFOLFOX6. We report here the results from the phase I evaluation of the combination. Methods: Patients (pts) with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal malignancy (irrespective of FGFR2b status) for whom mFOLFOX6 would be appropriate were eligible for enrollment in the phase I. Her2+ disease or prior treatment with FGF-FGFR inhibitors was not allowed. All pts in the Phase 1 received mFOLFOX6 combined with bema in Q2W cycles. Cohort 1 (3+3) began with bema 6 mg/kg and cohort 2 (Rolling-6) bema 15 mg/kg with one dose of 7.5 mg/kg on C1D8. A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation window of 28 days was used for both cohorts. Results: Cohorts 1 and 2 treated 3 pts and 9 pts respectively with a median of 4 and 2 prior lines of therapy. As of the iDMC data-cut on July 24, 2018, the median duration of treatment was 15 wks for cohort 1 and 4 wks for cohort 2; 6/9 pts in cohort 2 continue on treatment. No DLTs were identified. No adverse events (AEs) led to treatment discontinuation. There were no newly identified bema-related toxicities and the only ≥ Gr 2 AE attributable to bema in cohort 2 was fatigue (1 pt/Gr 2). The most common AEs overall were fatigue (6 pts/50%), nausea, vomiting and diarrhea (5 pts/42% each) and were generally attributed to FOLFOX or underlying disease. The ≥ Gr 3 AEs present in ≥ 1 pt were fatigue and neutropenia (2 pts/Gr 3 each). mFOLFOX6 did not affect bema exposure and all evaluable pts in cohort 2 achieved the target ≥ 60 µg/mL trough concentration by day 15. 2/7 pts at the data-cut had FGFR2b+ GC. Conclusions: Bema in combination with mFOLFOX6 has acceptable safety to proceed with the cohort 2 dose to the phase III portion of the FIGHT trial in previously untreated patients with FGFR2b+ GC. Clinical trial information: NCT03343301.
Primary results of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two and four courses of cisplatin/S-1 (CS) and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.
Authors: Yoshikawa Takaki , Sakamaki Kentaro , Nishikawa Kazuhiro , Fujitani Kazumasa , Tanabe Kazuaki , Ito Yuichi , Matsui Takanori , Miki Akira , Nemoto Hiroshi , Fukunaga Tetsu , Kimura Yutaka , Hirabayashi Naoki , Hayashi Tsutomu 
Published: January 2019

93 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is promising to improve the survival of resectable gastric cancer. Cisplatin/S-1 (CS) and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) are both active for metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: We conducted a randomized phase II trial to compare two and four courses of neoadjuvant S-1/cisplatin (SC) and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) using a two-by-two factorial design for locally resectable advanced gastric cancer. Patients with M0 and either T4 or T3 in case of junctional cancer or schirrhous type received two or four courses of cisplatin (60 mg/m2 at day 8)/S-1 (80 mg/m2 for 21 days with 1 week rest) or docetaxel (40 mg/m2 at day 1)/cisplatin (60 mg/m2 at day 1)/S-1 (80 mg/m2 for 14 days with 2 weeks rest) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Then, patients underwent D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy for 1 year. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival. The planned sample size was 120 eligible patients in total so that the treatment group with the superior observed 3-year OS rate by more than 60% as compared with 50% of the control group was to be selected with a probability of 85% or higher. Results: Between October 2011 and September 2014, 132 patients were assigned to CS (n = 66; 33 in 2-courses and 33 in 4-courses) and DCS (n = 66; 33 in 2-courses and 33 in 4-courses). The 3-year OS was 58.1% (95% CI, 45.8-70.3%) in CS and 60.0% (95% CI, 48.0-71.9%) in DCS with hazard ratio of 0796 (95% CI, 0.475-1.335), while that was 53.1% (95% CI, 40.9-65.4%) in the two courses and 65.0% (95% CI, 53.2-76.8%) in the four courses with hazard ratio of 0.722 (95% CI, 0.429-1.216). In the survival analysis by duration in each regimen, the 3-year OS was 58.1% (95% CI, 45.8-70.3%) both for two and four courses in CS, while that was 48.5% (95% CI, 31.4-65.5%) for two courses of DCS and was 71.9% (95% CI, 56.3-87.5%) for four courses of DCS. Conclusions: Considering high 3-year OS, four courses DCS has a value to be tested in a future phase III study to confirm superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000006378.
A phase III, double-blind, randomized study of pamiparib versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic gastric cancer (GC) that responded to platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.
Authors: Ciardiello Fortunato , Bang Yung-Jue , Bendell Johanna C. , Cervantes Andres , Brachmann Rainer Karl , Zhang Yuting , Raponi Mitch , Farin Heinrich , Lin Shen 
Published: January 2019

TPS173 Background: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer, and is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. In patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC, fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based combination chemotherapy is first-line standard of care. Despite refinement in chemotherapy regimens, outcomes are poor and survival after first-line treatment remains low. A subset of GCs exhibit platinum sensitivity and genomic instability that is characteristic of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase proteins 1 and 2 (PARP1/2) are involved in DNA damage repair, and their inhibition is cytotoxic for cells with HRD. Pamiparib is a selective PARP1/2 inhibitor that crosses the blood-brain barrier, has shown potent DNA–PARP trapping, and has demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical models. In early phase clinical studies (NCT02361723; NCT03333915), pamiparib was generally well tolerated and showed preliminary antitumor activity; 60 mg oral twice daily (BID) was established as the recommended dose. Methods: This ongoing, global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter phase III study (NCT03427814) is designed to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pamiparib vs placebo as maintenance therapy in ~540 patients with advanced GC who have responded to first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients who are ≤ 8 weeks after their last dose of first-line platinum based chemotherapy will be randomized 1:1 to receive either pamiparib 60 mg BID or placebo in 28-day cycles. Patient randomization will be stratified by genomic loss of heterozygosity status (ie, high vs low), region, and ECOG status. Radiologic assessments will be centrally evaluated per RECIST every 8 weeks after first dose. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival; key secondary endpoints include safety/tolerability, overall survival, objective response rates, time and duration of response, and time to second subsequent treatment. Correlative biomarker analyses in tumor tissues and blood will be performed. Clinical trial information: NCT03427814.
REVIVE study: Prospective observational study of efficacy and safety in chemotherapy (CTx) after progressive disease of nivolumab (NIV) therapy for metastatic gastric cancer (mGC).
Authors: Narita Yukiya , Shoji Hirokazu , Kawai Sadayuki , Mizukami Takuro , Nakamura Michio , Moriwaki Toshikazu , Yamanaka Takeharu , Sunakawa Yu , Kawakami Hisato , Nishina Tomohiro , Misumi Toshihiro , Yamashige Yu , Yamashige Akira , Muro Kei 
Published: January 2019

TPS178 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are drugs that block specific proteins produced by the immune system cells, such as T-cells; these proteins prevent T-cells from killing cancer cells. NIV is a standard care for pretreated mGC patients (pts), with increasing clinical use in Japan. Data from retrospective studies on various tumors have shown that after exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors, the objective response rate to CTx potentially improves; however, enough data have not been accumulated. Although there are no recommended CTx regimen following NIV therapy, in a clinical setting, an irinotecan or oxaliplatin combination regimen (limited to cisplatin-refractory or cisplatin-intolerant pts) is frequently used as post-NIV CTx. This multicenter observational study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CTx in NIV-refractory or NIV-intolerant mGC pts. Methods: We prospectively collect clinical and imaging data from NIV-pretreated mGC pts; these pts will be treated with cytotoxic agents. Pts who meet inclusion criteria A (histologically proven mGC pretreated with NIV, prior administration of a combination therapy of fluoropyrimidine plus platinum and taxanes, and written informed consent) at primary registration are registered. After primary registration, pts who meet inclusion criteria B [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS 0-2), refractory or intolerant to NIV; prior administration of irinotecan monotherapy or oxaliplatin combination regimens and prior use of cisplatin; evaluable lesions according to RECIST ver. 1.1] at formal registration are registered. The primary endpoint is overall survival of NIV-pretreated mGC pts after CTx. For this study, we require 146 pts, with bilateral alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.10, with a median threshold survival of 4.0 months and an expected median survival of 6.0 months. Therefore, we plan to enroll 200 pts, considering exclusions from the analysis; since May 2018, we have enrolled 27 pts. Clinical trial information: UMIN000032182.
A phase II, multicenter, open-label study of [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) in subjects with HER2-expressing gastric cancer.
Authors: Shitara Kohei , Bang Yung-Jue , Chung Hyun Cheol , Yabusaki Hiroshi , Iwasa Satoru , Sakai Daisuke , Muro Kei , Sugimoto Naotoshi , Yasui Hisateru , Gamoh Makio , Murakawa Yasuko , Negoro Yuji , Nishina Tomohiro , Hosaka Hisashi , Omuro Yasushi , Kawaguchi Yoshinori , Sugihara Masahiro , Saito Kaku , Dalal Rita , Yamaguchi Kensei 
Published: January 2019

TPS180 Background: There is no HER2-targeted therapy for patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer (GC) who progressed on trastuzumab-based therapy. [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) is a novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate with a humanized HER2 antibody, topoisomerase I inhibitor payload, cleavable peptide-based linker, and high drug-to-antibody ratio of approximately 8. In an ongoing phase I trial, [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan showed an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in salvage-line subjects with HER2+ GC who previously received trastuzumab (confirmed objective response rate [ORR] of 43.2% [19/44]; Iwata et al, ASCO 2018). Methods: The randomized, phase II, multicenter, open-label, DESTINY-Gastric01 study will assess the efficacy and safety of [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-expressing GC. The primary cohort, HER2+ (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+) GC subjects who progressed after ≥ 2 prior regimens and previously received trastuzumab, will be randomized (2:1) to [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan (6.4 mg/kg dose; once every 3 weeks) or physician’s choice (irinotecan or paclitaxel). Two nonrandomized exploratory cohorts will assess the efficacy and safety of [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan in subjects with HER2-low GC (IHC 2+/ISH- and IHC 1+, respectively) who are treatment-naïve to HER2-targeted therapies. The primary endpoint is ORR assessed by an independent central review; secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, duration of response, disease control rate, pharmacokinetics, and safety (as shown in ClinicalTrials.gov). The primary analysis for ORR and interim OS analysis will occur after all subjects complete tumor assessments on week 18 and when approximately 108 OS events are observed, whichever comes later. The primary cohort will enroll 180 subjects; providing 92.9% power to detect a difference between the ORR of 40% for [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan vs 15% for physician’s choice. Each exploratory cohort will enroll a maximum of 20 subjects. Enrollment began in October 2017. As of Feb 13, 2018, 12 of 180 subjects have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03329690.
NANT cancer vaccine an orchestration of immunogenic cell death by overcoming immune suppression and activating NK and T cell therapy in patients with third line or greater metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Seery Tara Elisabeth , Lee John H. , Sender Leonard S. , Jones Frank R. , Shinde Arvind Manohar , Annamalai Anand , Kistler Mira , Jafari Omid , Soon-Shiong Patrick 
Published: January 2019

TPS463 Background: Pancreatic cancer has multiple mechanisms to prevent immune recognition that lead to the creation of an immune suppressive tumor microenvironment. We hypothesize that effective and sustained response against tumors requires a coordinated approach that: 1. reverses the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment, 2. induces immunogenic tumor cell death and 3. reengages NK and T-cell tumor response against a 4. cascade of tumor antigens. To test this hypothesis, we developed the NANT Cancer Vaccine (NCV), which combines metronomic low-dose chemotherapy, radiotherapy and multifaceted immunotherapy. In proof-of-concept trials, the NCV was tested in 10 patients with 3rd-line or greater pancreatic cancer. These trials showed that the NCV could be safely administered in an outpatient setting, with AEs that were manageable by dose-reduction, and preliminary survival results that exceed the standard of care in this heavily-treated population. We believe these results warrant further research, and this abstract describes our newly-designed trial. Methods: A phase 1b, single-arm, open-label trial of the NANT Cancer Vaccine in patients with recurrent metastatic pancreatic cancer has been initiated. Treatment will occur in 3-week cycles of low-dose chemotherapy (aldoxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, oxaliplatin, nab-paclitaxel, 5-FU/L), antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab), SBRT, engineered allogeneic high affinity CD16 NK-92 cells (haNK), IL-15RαFc (N-803), adenoviral vector-based CEA vaccine (Ad-CEA), yeast vector-based RAS vaccine (Ye-RAS), and an IgG1 PD-L1 inhibitor, avelumab. The primary endpoint is incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints include ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS. A maximum of 24 patients will be enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03586869.
Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus S-1 plus metformin for resected pancreatic cancer: A multicenter and randomized phase II trial.
Authors: Narita Masato , Furukawa Masayuki , Sakamoto Ichiro , Itoh Yutaka , Nakano Hiroshi , Naka Takuji , Sudo Takeshi , Yahara Noboru , Aoki Hideki , Oota Kouji , Matsumoto Toshifumi , Shimokawa Mototsugu , Hisano Terumasa 
Published: January 2019

TPS474 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) improved the 5-year survival rate to 44.1% and therefore has been a standard of care in Japan. Recent epidemiologic data has revealed possibility of metformin (a drug for type II diabetes) improving the prognosis of PDAC. In this context, we compare the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus metformin with S-1 alone as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected PDAC. Methods: This multicenter-randomized-phase II study is conducted at 29 institutions in Japan (Registry Number; UMIN000020681). Key eligibility criteria are age 20 years or more with good performance status; histologically proven PDAC of stage I-II without macroscopic residual tumor. Patients receiving preoperative treatment for PDAC and previously treated with DPP-4 inhibitor, GLP-1, and metformin are excluded. After giving written consent to the study, patients are randomly assigned either study group (S-1 plus metformin) or control group (S-1 alone), balancing residual tumor status, nodal status, and institutions. S-1 is given orally for 2 weeks in a 3-week cycle. Cycles are lasted for 6 months. In the study group, metformin is administrated together with S-1 for 2 years. The treatment would be discontinued when the patient has either recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is 2-year OS, and the secondary endpoints are relapse-free survival and incidence rate of adverse events. Sample size was calculated based on the data in previous trials, with an expected 2-year survival rate in the control group of 65%. An improvement in 2-year-survival rate from 65% in the control group to 78% in the study group, yielding a hazard ratio of 0.58, is considered clinically relevant in this population. A total of 73 events in each group were required for a power of 80% at a two-sided alpha 20% to detect a difference in OS using an unstratified log-rank test. A total of 160 patients (80 per group) were estimated to achieve the specified number of events in the scheduled follow-up. Duration of this study would be 5 years and it has been started from January 2018. Until September 2018, 17 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020681.
Phase II randomized, double-blind, study of mFOLFIRINOX plus ramucirumab versus mFOLFIRINOX plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer patients hcrn GI14-198.
Authors: Shaib Walid Labib , O'Neil Bert , El-Rayes Bassel F. , Cohen Steven J. , Khair Tina Ashley , Robin Erwin L. , Huyck Timothy K. , Redman Rebecca A. , Sama Ashwin Reddy , Kassar Mohamad , Bekaii-Saab Tanios S. 
Published: January 2019

TPS475 Background: The prognosis of pancreas adenocarcinoma (PCA) remains poor. A chemotherapy backbone is the current standard of care in PCA. The choice of a chemotherapeutic backbone may impact the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy in PCA. Ramucirumab has increased activity with fluoropyrimidines (5FU) because 5FU increases VEGF expression. Methods: This is a double-blind, placebo controlled Phase II study. Subjects will receive either Ramucirumab or a placebo followed by mFOLFIRINOX every two weeks of a 28 day cycle until progression or discontinuation for other reasons. The primary endpoint of this clinical trial is nine month PFS defined as the time from enrollment to the time of progression or death. Among the key inclusion criteria, subjects must have recurrent or metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma (PCA) with no prior first-line systemic treatment, ECOG PS 0-1, adequate organ function, no DVT, PE or other thromboembolism within three months of randomization. Total number of patient enrolled as of September 19, 2018 is 48 of 85 at eight sites; 27 male (56%), 42 Caucasians (87.5%), three African American (6.2%), one Asian (2%). Median age is 63 (40 - 76). Majority of patients (41) had de novo metastatic disease and six with recurrent disease after surgery. Regimen has been tolerated well with no unanticipated events. Clinical trial information: NCT02581215.