Eradication of Minimal Residual Disease during Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma: CALGB 59909.
Authors: Sher Dorie , Johnson Jeffrey , Siddiqui Mariah , Caligiuri Michael A. , Damon Lloyd E. , Canellos George P. , Linker Charles , Cheson Bruce D. , Stock Wendy 
Published: October 2019

Abstract
Recent studies suggest that detection of subclinical, or minimal residual disease (MRD) in apheresis products used for autografting correlates with poor disease-free survival following ASCT for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). To validate this observation and to gain insights into the kinetics of MRD during treatment, we are performing a prospective analysis of MRD using quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) in patients (pts) undergoing treatment for MCL on a CALGB study (59909). Q-PCR of sequential paired bone marrow (BM) and blood (B) samples and of apheresis products was performed using either a patient-specific immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) or BCL-1 gene rearrangement. All samples were analyzed in triplicate using LightCycler technology and reported as a normalized ratio of IgH or BCL-1 copy number to GAPDH copy number. The sensitivity of the assay ranged from 1 X 104–1 X 105. To date, a clonal IgH or BCL-1 gene rearrangement was detected in 36 of 41 (88%) pts entered on study. Patient-specific primers and consensus probes were used for Q-PCR monitoring of MRD following two courses of intensive induction therapy, during stem cell mobilization, and 3 and 12 months after ASCT and post-transplant immunotherapy with Rituximab (R). 27 pts have completed all protocol treatment with a median follow-up of 7 months (range: 0–28). 26 pts were evaluated for MRD following two courses of induction therapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and R. 10 of 26 became MRD negative (−) following induction while 16 remained MRD positive (+). Following mobilization with high-dose cytarabine, etoposide and R, apheresis products from 9 of 10 MRD- pts were evaluated and all products were MRD- (1 pt not evaluable). Of the 16 pts who were MRD+ prior to mobilization therapy, MRD- apheresis products were collected in 8; 5 had MRD+ stem cell collections, and 3 were not evaluable. In total, apheresis products were evaluable in 22 of 26 pts; 17 (77%) had MRD- stem cells collected prior to ASCT. None of these MRD- pts has relapsed to date although 2 pts with MRD- products became weakly MRD+ 12 months following ASCT and R. Of the 5 pts with MRD+ apheresis collections, 4 have remained persistently MRD+ following ASCT and R; 1 has relapsed 19 months after completion of all treatment. Rising levels of MRD in BM and B samples were noted in this patient 3 and 12 months post-ASCT. Statistical comparison of MRD values in paired BM and B samples prior to, and post-ASCT demonstrated good agreement with an intraclass correlation coefficient of.814 and.777, respectively. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that prospective MRD monitoring using Q-PCR provides important insights into the kinetics of response during treatment of MCL. MRD- apheresis products were collected in the majority of pts following intensive induction and mobilization chemo-immunotherapy with R on CALGB 59909. To date, no pts with MRD- apheresis products have relapsed following ASCT. In contrast, it appears that pts with MRD+ apheresis products remain MRD+ following ASCT and R and may be more likely to relapse. Longer clinical follow-up is needed to clarify the significance of the persistence of MRD in apheresis products and following ASCT for MCL.