bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A nonrandomized confirmatory phase III study of sublobar surgical resection for peripheral ground glass opacity dominant lung cancer defined with thoracic thin-section computed tomography (JCOG0804/WJOG4507L).
Authors: Suzuki Kenji , Watanabe Shunichi , Wakabayashi Masashi , Moriya Yasumitsu , Yoshino Ichiro , Tsuboi Masahiro , Mitsudomi Tetsuya , Asamura Hisao 
Published: September 2018

8561 Background: The optimal mode of surgery for peripheral ground glass opacity (GGO) dominant lung cancer (LC) defined with thoracic thin-section computed tomography (TSCT) remains unknown. Methods: We conducted multi-institutional confirmatory phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sublobar resection for peripheral GGO dominant LC. Mode of surgery is basically wedge resection, and segmentectomy is allowed when surgical margin is insufficient ( < 5 mm) or histological invasiveness. LC with maximum tumor diameter (MTD) ≤ 2.0 cm and with consolidation tumor ratio ≤ 0.25 based on TSCT were registered. The primary endpoint was 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS). The planned sample size was 330, with the expected 5-year RFS of 98%, threshold of 95%, one-sided α of 5% and power of 90%. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and their confidence intervals were estimated by Greenwood’s formula. Results: Between May 2009 and April 2011, 333 pts were enrolled from 51 institutions. The primary endpoint, RFS was estimated on 314 pts who underwent sublobar resection. Median age was 62 (range 24 - 79) and 104 were smokers. Median MTD on lung window was 1.20 cm (0.53 - 2.00). Median MTD of consolidation was 0 (0.00 - 0.48). Operative modes were 258 wedge resection and 56 segmentectomy. Histological diagnosis were 310 adenocarcinomas, 27 precancerous lesions, and 14 non-neoplastic lesions. Median pathological surgical margin was 15 mm (0 - 55). Grade 2 or higher postoperative complications based on CTCAE v3.0 were observed in 119 (37.9%), and Grade 3 in 17 (5.4%), without any Grade 4 or 5. The 5-year RFS was 99.7% (95% CI, 97.7 - 100.0%), which met the primary endpoint. There was no local relapse. The ratio of FEV1.0 change between preoperative and one year after surgery over preoperative value ranged -37% to +49% with a median of -5%. Conclusions: Sublobar resection, mainly wedge resection, offered sufficient local control and RFS for peripheral GGO dominant LC on TSCT. Sublobar resection should be the first choice of mode of surgery if surgical margin is enough preserved. Clinical trial information: 000002008.
CNS response to osimertinib in patients (pts) with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC: Data from a randomized phase III trial (AURA3).
Authors: Mok Tony , Ahn Myung-Ju , Han Ji-Youn , Kang Jin Hyoung , Katakami Nobuyuki , Kim HyeRyun , Hodge Rachel , Ghiorghiu Dana C. , Cantarini Mireille , Wu Yi-Long , Papadimitrakopoulou Vassiliki , Garassino Marina C 
Published: September 2018

9005 Background: CNS metastases (mets) are common in pts with advanced NSCLC. Preclinical studies have shown CNS penetration of osimertinib, and clinical data from a pooled analysis of 2 Phase II trials (AURA extension: NCT01802632, AURA2: NCT02094261) showed activity in the CNS. We report the first evidence of osimertinib efficacy in CNS mets from a randomized Phase III study (AURA3; NCT02151981) in pts with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC who have progressed on or after prior EGFR-TKI therapy. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to osimertinib 80 mg once daily or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy every 3 wks for up to 6 cycles; maintenance pemetrexed was allowed. Pts with stable, asymptomatic CNS mets were eligible for enrolment. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted in pts with CNS mets present on baseline brain scan, as assessed by blinded independent central neuroradiology review (BICR), to define CNS objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR) and progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1. The CNS full analysis set (cFAS) included pts with ≥1 measurable and/or non-measurable CNS mets present on baseline brain scan by BICR; the CNS evaluable for response set (cEFR) included only pts with ≥1 measurable CNS mets. Results: As of 15 April 2016, 116/419 (28%) pts were included in the cFAS. In the cEFR (n = 46), CNS ORR was 70% (21/30; 95% CI 51, 85) with osimertinib and 31% (5/16; 95% CI 11, 59) with chemotherapy (OR, 5.13; 95% CI 1.44, 20.64; p = 0.015). In the cFAS, CNS ORR was 40% (30/75; 95% CI 29, 52) with osimertinib and 17% (7/41; 95% CI 7, 32) with chemotherapy (OR, 3.24; 95% CI 1.33, 8.81; p = 0.014). In the cEFR and cFAS, median CNS DoR was 8.9 months (m) (95% CI 4.3, NC and 4.3, NC) for osimertinib and 5.7 m (95% CI NC, NC and 4.4, 5.7; respectively) for chemotherapy. Median CNS PFS in the cFAS was significantly longer with osimertinib than with chemotherapy (11.7 vs 5.6 m; HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15, 0.69; p = 0.004). Conclusions: Consistent with the overall response to osimertinib reported in pts with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC, osimertinib was superior to chemotherapy in the treatment of pts with CNS mets; CNS response rate was higher, responses were more durable and CNS PFS was longer. Clinical trial information: NCT02151981.
Molecular determinants of response and resistance to anti-PD-(L)1 blockade in patients with NSCLC profiled with targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS).
Authors: Hellmann Matthew David , Sanchez-Vega Francisco , La Konnor , Rizvi Hira , Halpenny Darragh , Plodkowski Andrew , Long Niamh , Chatila Walid , Jonsson Philip , Arbour Kathryn Cecilia , Chaft Jamie E. , Rudin Charles M. , Kris Mark G. , Berger Michael F. , Taylor Barry S. , Zehir Ahmet , Arcila Maria E. , Ladanyi Marc , Riely Gregory J. , Schultz Nikolaus 
Published: September 2018

9015 Background: Anti-PD-(L)1 therapy has revolutionized treatment for patients (pts) with NSCLC. We previously reported that non-synonymous tumor mutation burden (TMB) by whole exome sequencing associates with immunotherapy benefit. Targeted NGS is increasingly routine in clinical practice and may be a useful tool for predicting benefit to anti-PD-(L)1 blockade. Methods: Pts had advanced NSCLC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 (+/- aCTLA-4) therapy and profiling by hybrid-capture NGS of 341-468 genes (MSK-IMPACT). Efficacy assessed by RECIST v1.1; durable clinical benefit (DCB) defined as PR or SD > 6mo. TMB and copy number alteration burden (“fraction of genome altered”, FGA) were normalized by size of genome covered. Comparisons were also made to a cohort of all NSCLCs profiled by MSK-IMPACT (n = 1679). Results: Of 437 evaluable pts treated with anti-PD-(L)1, 197 (45%) had NGS profiling, of whom 30% had DCB. TMB was higher in those with DCB vs no DCB (mean 10.2 vs 7.1 SNV/MB, p = 0.02) and compared to all NSCLCs ( < 0.0001). DCB was more common and PFS was longer in pts with > vs < 85th percentile TMB of all NSCLCs (Odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.9, p = 0.03; HR = 0.59, p = 0.004), but were similar when dichotomized at the 50th or 75th percentile. FGA was higher in pts with no DCB compared to all NSCLCs (p = 0.02). Molecular signatures related to deficient homologous-recombination-based DNA repair and smoking were more common in DCB vs no DCB (p = 0.042, p = 0.058) and vs all NSCLCs (p = 0.026, p = 0.01). Compared to all NSCLCs profiled by NGS, alterations in STK11and EGFRwere enriched in no DCB (p = 0.0008, p = 0.02). Alterations in JAK2and CD274(PD-L1) were uncommon (2.1%, 1.6%) but exclusively associated with no DCB. For a subset (n = 52) of these cases also profiled by whole exome sequencing, comparison with targeted NGS will be presented. Conclusions: In pts with NSCLC, targeted NGS profiling is a routinely available tool that can provide insight into predicting benefit with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Increased TMB associates with clinical benefit. Increased copy number alterations (FGA) and alterations in genes including STK11, JAK2, and CD274 may associate with resistance to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy.
A phase 1 study of osimertinib and bevacizumab as initial treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers.
Authors: Yu Helena Alexandra , Hayes Sara A. , Young Robert J. , Ni Ai , Rodriguez Christopher , Makhnin Alex , Riely Gregory J. , Kris Mark G. 
Published: September 2018

9033 Background: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the recommended first line treatment for EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Osimertinib, an EGFR TKI that inhibits both sensitizing EGFR mutations and EGFR T790M, is approved for use after progression on an EGFR TKI with evidence of EGFR T790M, and is currently being assessed as initial treatment for EGFR-mutant lung cancers. The addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib resulted in improved progression free survival (PFS) compared to erlotinib alone as initial treatment (16 vs 10 months, HR 0.41). This phase 1/2 study is assessing osimertinib and bevacizumab as initial treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Methods: We evaluated toxicity and efficacy of osimertinib and bevacizumab as initial treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Using a 3+3 design, full doses of osimertinib (80mg PO daily) and bevacizumab (15mg/kg IV q3 weeks) were given, with a planned dose de-escalation (osimertinib 40mg PO daily) should grade 3 or greater toxicity be seen. Six patients must be treated without a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) to determine the MTD. 43 additional patients will be treated at the MTD in the phase 2 study, with a primary endpoint of PFS at 12 months. Response was evaluated by RECIST 1.1. Results: From Sept 2016 to Jan 2017, 15 patients were enrolled. Median age: 63; Women 11; EGFR L858R = 8, Ex19del = 6, G709A/G719S = 1. After median duration of treatment of 2.7 months, no DLTs were seen in any patient. The MTD was determined to be osimertinib 80mg, bevacizumab 15mg/kg q3 weeks. In total, 15 patients are being treated at the MTD to date. Treatment-related adverse events (AE) were all grade 1-2, except for grade 3 hypertension. The most frequent treatment-related AEs (any grade) were rash (53%), diarrhea (40%), hypertension (33%), fatigue (20%), and itching (20%). All 15 patients continue on study. Conclusions: Combination osimertinib and bevacizumab is a tolerable first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers and the MTD is osimertinib 80mg and bevacizumab 15mg/kg q3 weeks. Assessment of efficacy with an endpoint of PFS at 12 months is ongoing. Supported by AstraZeneca (NCT02803203). Clinical trial information: NCT02803203.
Afatinib (Afa) plus bevacizumab (Bev) combination after acquired resistance (AR) to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Multicenter single arm phase II trial (ABC-study).
Authors: Hata Akito , Katakami Nobuyuki , Kaji Reiko , Yokoyama Toshihide , Kaneda Toshihiko , Tamiya Motohiro , Inoue Takako , Kimura Hiromi , Yano Yukihiro , Tamura Daisuke , Morita Satoshi , Negoro Shunichi 
Published: September 2018

9034 Background: Irreversible EGFR-TKI monotherapies showed only moderate efficacy after AR to reversible EGFR-TKIs. Preclinical studies suggested that addition of Bev to EGFR-TKIs could overcome AR, and Bev demonstrated synergistic effects with Afa in TKI-resistant xenograft models. Methods: ECOG PS 0-2 patients (pts) with EGFR-mutant NSCLC after AR to EGFR-TKIs were enrolled at any lines. Rebiopsy was essential to confirm T790M status after AR. Afa was prescribed at 30 mg, and Bev administered at 15 mg/kg tri-weekly until progression. Results: Between October 2014 and September 2016, 33 eligible pts were enrolled. Median age was 66 (range, 48-86). Twenty-one (64%) pts were female, and 22 (67%) were never smoker. Mutation subtypes were 20 (61%) Del-19, 12 (36%) L858R, and 1 (3%) L861Q. T790M was detected in 14 (42%) pts. Median number of prior regimens was 4 (range, 1-10). First prior TKIs were 20 (61%) gefitinib, 10 (30%) erlotinib or 3 (9%) Afa. Six pts obtained partial response and 23 stable disease, resulting in response rate (RR) of 18.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0-35.5%) and disease control rated of 87.9% (95% CI, 71.8-96.6%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 5.9 (95% CI, 3.5-8.8) months and not reached, respectively. Median RR and PFS of T790M+ vs. T790M- were 14.3% vs. 21.2% (p = 0.6189) and 6.2 vs. 5.2 months (p = 0.8619), respectively. Median RR and PFS of Del-19 vs. L858R were 20.0% vs. 8.3% (p = 0.3789) and 5.9 vs. 5.1 months (p = 0.8996), respectively. Afa dosage was reduced to 20 mg in 15 (45%) pts and increased to 40 mg in 2 (6%) pts. Median number of Bev administrations was 6 (range, 1-14). Bev was interrupted in 5 (15%) pts. Adverse events ≥grade 3: rash (3%); paronychia (24%); mucositis (6%); diarrhea (3%); liver dysfunction (3%); hypertension (39%); and proteinuria (15%) were observed. There were no treatment-related deaths, interstitial lung disease, nor Bev-associated severe bleedings. Conclusions: Afa + Bev demonstrated the efficacy and safety after AR to EGFR-TKIs. It could be a therapeutic salvage option for T790M- populations. Clinical trial information: UMIN000014710.
Gefitinib as third-line re-challenge treatment in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR activating mutation who benefited from first-line gefitinib treatment followed by second-line chemotherapy.
Authors: Song Yong , Wu Yi-Long , Cao Lejie , Chen Jianhua , Ma Zhiyong , Cui Jiuwei , Ye Xin , Ding Jingyan 
Published: September 2018

9035 Background: Several studies show that EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients (pts) gained response to EGFR-TKI treatment again after a TKI free interval. To date, no prospective evaluation of the clinical effects of EGFR-TKI re-challenge in EGFR-mutant NSCLC pts has been performed. Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study (CTONG1304, NCT01933347). Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC pts with EGFR exon 19del/L858R mutation, who previously benefited from first-line gefitinib treatment followed by second-line chemotherapy, took gefitinib 250mg/d until disease progression or death or intolerable toxicity occurred. Blood samples were dynamically collected for EGFRmutation testing using droplet digital PCR at every visit (from baseline to the end of gefitinib treatment). The primary objective was disease control rate (DCR) at week 8. Secondary objectives were objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: From March 2014 to May 2016, 45 eligible pts were enrolled and 43 pts were included in the full analysis set (FAS) for efficacy analysis. Gefitinib re-challenge achieved DCR of 69.8%. ORR was 4.7%. Median PFS and OS were 4.4 and 8.0 months (m) respectively. T790M- subgroup at baseline had higher DCR, longer mPFS and mOS, compared with T790M+ subgroup. EGFRstatus changed significantly after gefitinib re-challenge. Conclusions: Gefitinib re-challenge was an effective option in EGFR-mutant NSCLC pts. T790M negativity is a potentially predictive efficacy biomarker for gefitinib re-challenge. Clinical trial information: NCT01933347. [Table: see text]
Tolerability and antitumor activity of ASP8273 in TKI-naive Japanese subjects with EGFR mutation–positive non-small cell lung cancer.
Authors: Sugawara Shunichi , Azuma Koichi , Nishio Makoto , Hayashi Hidetoshi , Kiura Katsuyuki , Satouchi Miyako , Hida Toyoaki , Nakamura Atsushi , Iwamoto Yasuo , Inoue Akira , Takeda Koji , Ikeda Satoshi , Nakagawa Tomoki , Asahina Seitaro , Komatsu Kanji , Morita Satoshi , Fukuoka Masahiro , Nakagawa Kazuhiko 
Published: September 2018

9037 Background: EGFR-activating mutations (eg, exon 19 deletions [ex19del], L858R) occur in ~50% of East Asian patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. ASP8273, an orally administered EGFR TKI that inhibits EGFR-activating mutations, has demonstrated clinical activity in subjects with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRmut+) NSCLC. Methods: EGFR TKI-naïve adult subjects (≥20 yr) with EGFRmut+ NSCLC were enrolled in this single arm Phase 2 study conducted in Japan (NCT02500927). Subjects received open-label ASP8273 300 mg once daily until discontinuation criteria were met. Primary endpoint was tolerability; secondary endpoint was antitumor activity defined by RECIST v1.1. Results: A total of 31 Japanese subjects (12 M/19 F; median age 64 years [range: 31–82]) were enrolled. Based on local testing, 27 subjects had an ex19del (n = 13, 42%) or a L858R (n = 14, 45%) EGFR activating mutation; 4 subjects (13%) had other EGFR activating mutations (L861Q [n = 2], G719X [n = 2]). ASP8273 300 mg had tolerable adverse events with diarrhea and peripheral neuropathy being most common; no interstitial lung disease events were reported (Table). Across all 31 subjects, based on investigator assessment, treatment with 300 mg ASP8273 was associated with an overall response rate (ORR) of 52%, disease control rate (DCR) of 94%, and a median duration of progression-free survival (PFS) of 11.3 months (95% CI: 7.2, 15.5). In subjects with ex19del, ASP8273 300 mg was associated with an ORR of 46% and DCR of 85%; median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI: 2.9, -). In subjects with the L858R, ASP8273 300 mg was associated with an ORR of 57% and DCR of 100%; median PFS was 15.5 months (95% CI: 7.2, 15.5). Conclusions: Once-daily ASP8273 300 mg was tolerable in TKI-naïve Japanese subjects with EGFRmut+ NSCLC and demonstrated antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02500927. [Table: see text]
YES1 amplification as a mechanism of acquired resistance (AR) to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) identified by a transposon mutagenesis screen and clinical genomic testing.
Authors: Fan Pang-Dian , Narzisi Giuseppe , Jayaprakash Anitha , Venturini Elisa , Robine Nicolas , Smibert Peter , Germer Soren , Jordan Emmet , Wang Lu , Jungbluth Achim A , Spraggon Lee , Lovly Christine Marie , Kris Mark G. , Yu Helena Alexandra , Riely Gregory J. , Varmus Harold , Politi Katerina A. , Ladanyi Marc 
Published: September 2018

9043 Background: Overcoming AR to EGFR TKIs remains challenging, and in many cases the mechanisms are still unclear. To identify novel mechanisms of resistance to EGFR TKIs, we performed a forward genetic screen using transposon mutagenesis in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma cells. Methods: EGFR TKI-sensitive PC9 cells were co-transfected with plasmids encoding a mutagenic piggyBactransposon and hyperactive piggyBac transposase. Transposon-tagged, afatinib-resistant clones were generated by sequential selection of transfected cells with puromycin and 1µM afatinib. Transposon insertion sites were mapped using a modified TraDIS-type method and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Selected clones were characterized using Western blots, receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) arrays, and viability assays following treatment with TKIs or siRNA-mediated gene knockdowns. We reviewed MSK-IMPACT™ NGS data on 100 patient tumors with EGFR TKI AR. Available tumor samples were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Results: In 187/188 afatinib-resistant clones, transposon insertion sites consistent predominantly with gene upregulation were found in MET, the Src family kinase (SFK) member YES1, or both. Clones with activating YES1 insertions exhibited resistance to all three generations of EGFR TKIs; high levels of expression of tyrosine-phosphorylated YES1; sensitivity to the SFK TKI dasatinib and to siRNA-mediated knockdown of YES1; and tyrosine phosphorylation of YAP1 and ERBB3. A query of the MSK-IMPACT™ data on EGFR TKI AR patients revealed amplification of YES1 and no alteration of MET, ERBB2 or BRAF in 3/54 T790M-negative (95% CI 1 to 16%) and 1/46 (95% CI 1 to 12%) T790M-positive cases. Amplification of YES1was confirmed by FISH in 2/2 cases, and was absent in matched pre-TKI samples in 2/2 cases. Conclusions: YES1 amplification is found in 4% of patients with acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs and is potentially targetable by Src family kinase inhibitors. Forward genetic screens using transposon mutagenesis and routine clinical NGS of patient samples can identify novel mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies.
Association between hospital volume and overall survival of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Authors: Goyal Gaurav , Bartley Adam C. , Go Ronald S. 
Published: September 2018

9044 Background: Prior studies have shown superior surgical outcomes of stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in centers with higher patient volumes. However, there is a lack of such information in stage IV NSCLC. In this study, we aim to determine the association between the number of patients with stage IV NSCLC treated annually at a treatment facility (volume) and all-cause mortality (outcome). Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between 2004 and 2013. We classified the facilities by quartiles (Q; mean patients with NSCLC treated per year): Q1: < 13.8; Q2: 13.8 to 23.6, Q3: 23.6 to 30.3, and Q4: > 30.3. We used sandwich variance estimators to account for clustering of patients within facilities and Cox regression to determine the volume-outcome relationship, adjusting for demographic (sex, age, race), socioeconomic (insurance type), receipt of chemotherapy, and comorbid (Charlson-Deyo score) factors and year of diagnosis. Results: There were 281,654 patients with stage IV NSCLC treated at 1,275 facilities. The median age at diagnosis was 66 years, and 55.7% were men. The median annual facility volume was 23.6 patients per year (range, 1.0 to 301.4). The distribution of patients according to facility volume was: Q1: 6.6%, Q2: 14.9%, Q3: 25.4%, and Q4: 53.1%. The unadjusted median overall survival by facility volume was: Q1: 4.4 months, Q2: 4.5 months, Q3: 4.7 months, and Q4: 5.3 months ( P< .001). Multivariable analysis showed that facility volume was independently associated with all-cause mortality. Compared with patients treated at Q4 facilities, patients treated at lower-quartile facilities had a small but significantly higher risk of death (Q3 hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.07]; Q2 HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.09]; Q1 HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.13]). Conclusions: Patients who were treated for stage IV NSCLC at lower-volume facilities had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with those who were treated at lower-volume facilities. [Table: see text]