Abstract P5-16-08: Applications of rib sparing technique in internal mammary vessels exposure of abdominal free flap breast reconstructions
Authors: Zhang Q , Xiao Q , Guo R , Wu J , Gu Y , Xiu B 
Published: May 2019

Abstract
Background:
Internal mammary vessels (IMVs) are widely used recipient vessels in abdominal free flaps breast reconstructions. Exposure of IMVs usually needs to resect a segment of costal cartilage or rib during the operations. The rib sparing technique is an alternative method with less damage. This study aims to analysis the applicability and advantages of rib sparing technique of IMVs exposure in breast reconstruction.
Methods:
medical records of 215 patients who underwent abdominal free flap reconstruction from November 2006 to December 2017 were analyzed. The factors influencing the choice of vessels and rib sparing were analyzed. The outcomes of rib sparing were assessed. Intercostal space (ICS) width and other related data were measured by the preoperative thin slice chest computed tomography (CT) scan images.
Results:
Among all 215 patients with 218 flaps, 172 flaps used IMVs as the recipient vessels while 13 used thoracodorsalvessels and 33 used subscapular vessels. The proportion of IMVs as recipient vessels showed a rising trend in general and remained over 90% for the last three years in our center. Patients with immediate reconstruction (p=0.005) and axillary lymph nodes dissection(ALND) (p&lt;0.001) were less likely to use IMVs, both in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Patients' BMI and radiotherapy history showed no statistically significant differences between the IMVs group and the other vessels group (p=0.338 and 0.811). The rib sparing rate in IMVs exposure increased yearly and exceeded 40% in 2013, now it maintained more than 60% during the recent 3 years. Additionally, among the patients who received rib sparing IMVs exposure in 2017, the mean ICS width was relatively smaller than that in 2013 (2.54cm V.S 2.93cm, p=0.124). Compared with rib resection group, patients with rib sparing were higher (163.57 ± 4.44 cm vs. 161.83 ± 4.30 cm, p=0.047) and with a wider ICS (2.65 ± 0.54 cm vs. 2.25± 0.38 cm, p&lt;0.01), while the depth from the surface of the pectoralis major muscle to the IMVs and distance between the parasternal line and IMVs had no difference between the two groups. Rib sparing group has a shorter surgery and hospitalization time, as well as a lower severe complication rate, but the differences were not statistically significant (p= 0.120, 0.450 and 0.296).
Conclusion:
IMVs were used more frequently as the recipient vessels in abdominal free flap breast reconstructions, especially when axillary operation was not carried out at the same time. Rib sparing technique had the potential to decrease surgery time and hospitalization days, as well as the severe complications rate. It could be used in most of patients received free flap reconstruction when IMVs were used, particularly in higher patients and patients with a wider ICS. Preoperative slice chest CT scan can be used to measure the ICS width to provide suggestions for dealing with the ribs.
Citation Format: Zhang Q, Xiao Q, Guo R, Wu J, Gu Y, Xiu B. Applications of rib sparing technique in internal mammary vessels exposure of abdominal free flap breast reconstructions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-08.