Development of Enterprises in Universities and Policy Implications for University Governance Reform in Vietnam
Authors: Van Toan Dinh 
Published: March 2019

The article focuses on analyzing the content and relationship between the development of enterprises, enterprise-university models and governance in higher education institutions, thereby providing policy recommendations on innovation in university governance in Vietnam. In the article, documents from internationally published researches as well as arguments on the mentioned subjects are analyzed and synthesized. Results of surveys and analysis on the status of universities in Vietnam that are presented in the article also demonstrate a detailed picture of difficulties and issues in enterprise development and transition into enterprise-university model. On this basis, the article provides recommendations for universities and on the issues that require government’s intervention through supportive policies and mechanisms to accelerate the process of university governance reform in the current period of 4.0 revolution in university education.
Keywords
Higher education institutions, Developing enterprise in universities, University-enterprise model, University governance
References
[1] Trần Anh Tài, Trịnh Ngọc Thạch, Mô hình đại học doanh nghiệp: Kinh nghiệm quốc tế và gợi ý cho Việt Nam, Tái bản lần thứ nhất, NXB Khoa học Xã hội, 2003.[2] Yokoyama K, Entrepreneurialism in Japanese and UK Universities: Governance, Management, Leadership and Funding. High Educ (2006) 52: 523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-1168-2.[3] Dinh Van Toan, University - Enterprise Cooperation in International Context and Implications for Vietnam, Vietnam Economic Review No. 7 (275), (2017).[4] Dinh Van Toan, Hoang Van Hai, Nguyen Phuong Mai, The Role of Entrepreneurship Development in Universities to Promote Knowledge Sharing: The Case of Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Kỷ yếu tại hội thảo quốc tế: "Asia Pacific Conference on Information Management 2016: Common Platform to A Sustainable Society In The Dynamic Asia Pacific", Hanoi, 2016.[5] Wennekers S. & Thurik R., Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth, Small Business Economics (1999) 13: 27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008063200484.[6] Clark. B. R., Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Oxford: IAU Press and Pergamon, 1998.[7] Etzkowitz H., MIT and The Rise of Entrepreneurial Science, Routledge, New York, 2002.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203216675.[8] Geiger R. L., Knowledge and Money: Research Universities and The Paradox of The Marketplace, Stanford University Press, 2004.[9] Slaughter, S., Leslie, L., Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and The Entrepreneurial University, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1997.[10] Slaughter, S., Rhoades G., Academic Capitalism and The New Economy: Markets, State and Higher Education, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2004.[11] Washburn, J., University Inc: The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education, Stanford University Press, 2005. [12] Han J. và Heshmati A., Determinants of Financial Rewards from Industry-University Collaboration in South Korea, IZA Discussion Paper No. 7695 (2013). [13] Trần Anh Tài, Liên kết nhà trường và doanh nghiệp trong hoạt động đào tạo và nghiên cứu khoa học - kinh nghiệm quốc tế và gợi ý cho Việt Nam, Đề tài cấp ĐHQG, 2009-2010, 2010. [14] Yusof M., Jain K. K., Categories of University-level entrepreneurship: a literature survey, Int. Entrep. Manag. J (2010) 6:81-96. DOI 10.1007/s11365-007-0072-x.[15] Dinh Van Toan, Promoting university startups’ development: International experiences and policy recommendations for Vietnam, Vietnam’s Socio-Economic Development, Vol. 22, No. 90, 7/2017, tr. 19-42.[16] Rothaermel F.T., Agung S.D. and Jiang L., University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature, Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 16, Number 4, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 691-791.[17] Bercovitz J. & Feldman M., Entrepreneurial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge Based Economic Development, The Journal of Technology Transfer (2006) 31: 175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z[18] Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M., Feller, I. và cộng sự, Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behavior: An Exploratory Study of Duke, John Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities, The Journal of Technology Transfer (2001) 26: 21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007828026904[19] Feldman, M., Bercovitz, J., Burton, R., Equity and The Technology Strategies of American Research Universities, Management Science, 48(1), 2002, 105-121.[20] Owen-Smith, J., Trends and transitions in the institutional environment for public and private science, Higher Education, 49, 2005, 91-117.[21] Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W., The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing The Importance of Experience and Connectivity, Research Policy, 32(9), 2003, 1695-1711.[22] Colyvas J.A., Powell W.W., From Vulnerable to Venerated: The Institutionalization of Academic Entrepreneurship in The Life Science, in Martin Ruef, Michael Lounsbury (ed.) The Sociology of Entrepreneurship (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 25) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2007, pp.219 – 259. [23] Luthje C., Franke N., Fostering entrepreneurship through university education and training: Lessons from Massachusetts Institute of Techolology, European Academy of Management, 2nd Annual Conference on Innovative Research in Management, Stockholm, 2002.[24] Trần Anh Tài, Liên kết nhà trường và doanh nghiệp trong hoạt động đào tạo và nghiên cứu khoa học - kinh nghiệm quốc tế và gợi ý cho Việt Nam, Đề tài cấp ĐHQG, 2009-2010. [25] G. Dalmarco, W. Hulsink, Creating entrepreneurial university in an emerging country: Evidence from Brazil, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.015] [26] Đinh Văn Toàn, 2018, Phát triển doanh nghiệp trong đại học: Kinh nghiệm trên thế giới và gợi ý chính sách cho Việt Nam, Tạp chí Kinh tế và dự báo, số 33, 12/2018, tr.58-60.[27] Nguyễn Hữu Đức, Nguyễn Hữu Thành Chung, Nghiêm Xuân Huy, Mai Thị Quỳnh Lan, Trần Thị Bích Liễu, Hà Quang Thụy, Nguyễn Lộc, Tiếp cận giáo dục đại học 4.0 – Các đặc trưng và tiêu chí đánh giá, Tạp chí Khoa học ĐHQGHN: Nghiên cứu chính sách và quản lý, Vol.34, số 4, 2018.