bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
BN SO39 - Laparoscopic Release of Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: A Case Series
Authors: Patel Agastya , Lancellotti Francesco , Lambert Joel , Kadamapuzha Jacob , Satyadas Thomas 
Published: November 2024

Abstract

Background
Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a recognized, but rare condition, which is characterized by compression of the celiac artery and ganglion by median arcuate ligament. The entity often presented with chronic post-prandial abdominal pain, vomiting, and weight loss. These patients often undergo comprehensive investigation prior to diagnosis of MALS. This report presents our experience and short-term outcomes of patients with laparoscopic release of MALS at our center.

Method
Between 2022-2024, five patients with MALS underwent laparoscopic release at a tertiary HPB center under a single surgeon (TS). Data on patient demographics, presenting symptoms and duration, preoperative diagnostic tests, intraoperative findings and complications, postoperative complications, symptom recurrence and follow-up were prospectively maintained. All patients were discussed at a tertiary Vascular and HPB MDT; MALS was confirmed on US doppler (USD) and CT angiogram (CTA) (fish-hook type configuration of Celiac Truck with post-stenotic dilatation).

Results
Two male and three female patients, with a median (range) age of 41 (25-70) years, underwent laparoscopic MALS release. The median (range) preoperative symptom duration was 54 (24-67) months, with most common presentation of post-prandial abdominal pain and weight loss. The median (range) BMI was 19.61 (18.30-17.82). The median (range) operative time was 313 (166-330) minutes. One patient required conversion to open due to bleeding from celiac trunk. The median (range) LOS was 7 (4-7) days. No postoperative complications occurred. The median follow-up was 10 months. One patient re-experienced abdominal pain, with no evidence of recurrence on USD and CTA.

Conclusion
Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome should be considered as a differential in patients presenting with chronic post-prandial abdominal pain and weight loss. Thorough investigation (USD and CTA) along with discussion at Vascular MDT should be undertaken. Laparoscopic release of MALS is a safe and effective treatment option in this cohort.
BN SO52 - Innovative Tools for Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) in Torbay Hospital
Authors: Manasseh Mina , Bowling Kirk 
Published: November 2024

Abstract

Background
Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is a minimally invasive technique used to manage common bile duct (CBD) stones. The procedure has evolved significantly with the development of specialized tools that enhance efficacy and patient outcomes. This abstract aims to discuss the various tools employed for LCBDE at Torbay Hospital, highlighting their specific uses, benefits, and outcomes.

Method
We conducted a retrospective analysis of LCBDE procedures performed at Torbay Hospital. The tools used included the Pusen ‘Skinny scope’, Ambscope, Nathenson tipless basket, GB stone retrieval basket, and Rotacrusher. Data were collected on the types of tools used, procedural success rates, stone clearance rates, and any complications

Results
The Pusen ‘Skinny scope’ (3mm) was used in 60% of cases for transcystic exploration, showing high success in stone visualization and retrieval. The Ambscope (5mm) was used in 30% of cases for choledochotomy, effectively accessing larger stones. The Nathenson tipless basket retrieved up to 8mm stones in 45% of cases. The GB stone retrieval basket extracted non-disposable stones up to 2cm. The Rotacnsher, used for large stones in choledochotomy, was highly effective but needed larger port access. Laser and mechanical lithotripters fragmented stones larger than 1cm with an 85% success rate. Overall stone clearance was 90% with minimal complications.

Conclusion
The use of specialized tools in LCBDE at Torbay Hospital has significantly improved the management of CBD stones. The Pusen ‘Skinny scope’ and Ambscope provide excellent visualization and access, while the Nathenson tipless basket and GB stone retrieval basket offer reliable stone extraction capabilities. Advanced lithotripters further enhance the ability to manage larger stones. These tools collectively contribute to high success rates and favorable patient outcomes, reinforcing the value of LCBDE in modern surgical practice.
BN SO54 - Complex Management of a Gastrocutaneous Fistula Following Pancreatic Necrosectomy: A Case Report
Authors: Dionísio Daniela Venâncio , Fonseca Cláudia , Bicho Luís , Pupo Alexandra , Marques Hugo Pinto 
Published: November 2024

Abstract

Background
Gastrocutaneous fistulas are rare but serious complications that can arise following the surgical treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. This post-operatory complication can be refractory to conservative management and may be further aggravated by severe skin injuries and malnutrition. This case report describes the comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach of a challenging case of gastrocutaneous fistula, ultimately requiring re-intervention.

Method
A 78-year-old female with a history of severe necrotizing pancreatitis underwent pancreatic necrosectomy by laparotomy. Postoperatively, she developed a gastric fistula, initially repaired with a double-layered suture. Recurrence led to a gastrocutaneous fistula with continuous gastric drainage and chemical burn of the surrounding skin. Initial conservative management included insertion of a nasogastric tube for gastric decompression, followed by placement of a PEG tube to redirect the drainage and prevent further skin damage and an esophagojejunal feeding tube to bypass the fistula and maintain nutrition. Nevertheless, the fistula persisted, resulting in significant skin erosion and deterioration of the patient’s condition.

Results
Given the failure of conservative measures and a concurrent diagnosis of a pancreatic fistula, a surgical approach was deemed necessary. The patient was transferred to a specialized hospital center, where she underwent fistulectomy with partial gastrectomy and wound closure. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was applied to the ulcerated skin to promote healing. This approach led to the successful closure of the gastrocutaneous fistula and healing of the skin wound. The patient showed marked clinical recovery, with no signs of infection or fistula recurrence and the nutritional status was successfully managed through enteral feeding leading to a notable functional recovery.

Conclusion
This case underlines the complexity of managing gastrocutaneous fistulas, demonstrating the efficacy of combining surgical and supportive therapies, serving as a reference for similar future cases and emphasizing the need for comprehensive management strategies for complex postoperative complications.
BN SO62 - Laparoscopic technique for right sided paraduodenal hernia repair: A clinical study and surgical insights
Authors: Pannu Arslan , Needham Paul 
Published: November 2024

Abstract

Background
Paraduodenal hernias can present significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with up to 50% potentially leading to bowel obstruction. A minimally invasive approach to repairing these defects offers reduced morbidity and quicker recovery. This report highlights the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic repair of a right-sided paraduodenal hernia.

Method
A 19-year-old female presented with persistent postprandial bilious vomiting and a long history of forceful regurgitation 10-30 minutes after eating. The preoperative evaluation, surgical technique and operative outcomes are detailed.

Results
Preoperative evaluation included magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and a barium swallow, revealing an incidental finding of the duodenojejunal flexure and most jejunal loops on the right side of the abdomen.
A right paraduodenal hernia was diagnosed during laparoscopy. After delineating and reducing the hernia laparoscopically, the sac was obliterated by opening up the posterior aspect over the inferior vena cava. The repair was completed by suturing the hernia orifice and plicating the duodenum. The patient's symptoms resolved postoperatively, with no intraoperative or immediate postoperative adverse outcomes reported. Scheduled outpatient follow-up showed satisfactory resolution of symptoms.

Conclusion
The laparoscopic repair of the right paraduodenal hernia was successfully performed, leading to the resolution of the patient's symptoms. This case underscores the importance of considering laparoscopic approaches for managing complex and rare hernias, especially when cross-sectional imaging modalities do not clearly identify the cause of symptoms. The laparoscopic technique offers significant advantages, including reduced pain and faster recovery.
HPB SO13 - Comparative analysis of cost and clinical benefit of Robotic Surgery (RS) vs Laparoscopic Surgery (LS) for the treatment of symptomatic liver cysts
Authors: Chin Sirr Ling , Hamady Zaed , Arshad Ali 
Published: November 2024

Abstract

Background
The treatment for symptomatic liver cysts involves the removal of a large portion of the cyst wall (deroofing/fenestration). Robotic surgery (RS) is now used more commonly to treat liver cysts. It is unclear whether RS or laparoscopic surgery (LS) results in superior clinical or economic outcomes. The objective of this study is to compare the cost and clinical benefit of RS vs LS in adults with liver cyst(s).

Method
Patients meeting inclusion criteria were identified from operating notes and a prospectively held hospital database between 2019 to 2024. Eligible candidates were further investigated for post-operative outcome, length of stay (LOS), subsequent in-person clinic follow-ups for review and removal of drain, and further treatment in patients with recurrence of liver cyst. Financial data for all surgical equipment in RS and LS were provided by sales representatives from the relevant industries.

Results
Forty-four LS and seven RS patients were analysed. Neither approach recorded a return to theatre. There was no mortality in either group. There was a significantly shorter LOS for RS vs LS patients (median LOS=1 vs 2 days, p&lt;0.05). There was no significant difference in bile leak, drain duration or cyst recurrence between LS and RS. The economic analysis revealed that without taking into account reduced LOS, the costs of RS and LS was £1261.70 and £1733.61 per procedure, respectively. The increased cost in LS was primarily due to multiple stapler firings (median staplers used=5) vs zero staplers in RS.

Conclusion
Robotic liver cyst surgery is cheaper and provides better clinical outcomes in terms of shorter LOS and reduced complications. Further studies are warranted to examine the long-term cost-effectiveness of RS.
HPB SO26 - Evaluation of Theatre Database Accuracy in a Tertiary HPB Center According to NCIP Standards in the UK
Authors: Fouad Mina , Malek Sepand , Beckingham Ian 
Published: November 2024

Abstract

Background
The goal of creating the NCIP (National Clinical Improvement Programme) theatre data set discovery information system is to allow NHS Improvement to evaluate how theatre data can improve the attribution of surgical activities, as documented in Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Admitted Patient Care (APC) data, to individual consultants. The success of NCIP is at risk due to the inaccurate attribution of existing activity data to consultants.

Method
The NCIP theatre database for the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery department was compiled over a 12-month period (from April 2022 to April 2023) and analyzed based on the operating consultant recorded in the operative notes, clinical letters, and the Carfelow system (admitting office records).

Results
In Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH), 143 major liver and pancreatic resections were performed, including 38 Whipple’s procedures (both classic and Pylorus-preserving Pancreatico-Duodenectomy), 19 Distal Pancreatectomies, and 86 Liver resections. Of these, only 58 patients (40.6%) had correct entries in the NCIP database regarding the operating surgeon. The NCIP data inaccuracies for the operating consultant were 65.8% (25/38) for Whipple’s procedures, 57.9% (11/19) for Distal Pancreatectomies, and 56.97% (49/86) for Liver resections. Conversely, the NCIP data was 100% accurate concerning the assigned consultant on Careflow, which matches the clinical letters from the outpatient clinic.

Conclusion
The gap between the NCIP database and the admitting office database leads to inaccurate attributions of surgical activity. This hinders learning and improvement efforts essential for achieving program benefits and prevents providers from complying with license conditions and delivering efficient healthcare services. To ensure accurate HES data, admitting officers should request proper communication and accurate consultant codes from consultant secretaries to ensure accurate data across the different hospital systems
HPB SO30 - Evaluation of efficiency of Co-amoxiclav as an empiric antimicrobial treatment for grade II/ III acute cholecystitis
Authors: Elmetwally Ashraf , Canelo Ruben 
Published: November 2024

Abstract

Background
Acute cholecystitis is associated with considerable mortality. The risk of mortality ranges between 2.4% to 8.4% according to severity. The main line of managing patient presenting with grade II/ III acute cholecystitis is source control through insertion of cholecystostomy drain (if patient is not suitable for emergency cholecystectomy) and anti-microbial treatment. Tokyo 2018 guidelines recommends against use of Co-Amoxiclav as an empiric antimicrobial therapy for cases of acute cholecystitis as most common organism isolated is E. Coli. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of Co-amoxiclav as an empiric antimicrobial treatment for grade II/ III acute cholecystitis.

Method
The medical records were searched retrospectively for patient presented with acute severe cholecystitis grade II/ III who treated with cholecystostomy drain insertion as a temporary measure during 2020 and 2021.
The culture and sensitivity (C&S) of cholecystostomy drain aspirate at time of insertion of the drains were reviewed to determine the type of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The results were analysed using both best and worst case scenario to find about the efficacy of Co-Amoxiclav as an empiric antimicrobial treatment.

Results
105 sample of cholecystostomy drain aspirate sent for culture and sensitivity, 27 samples were resistant to co-amoxiclav (25%), while 22 samples were sensitive to co-amoxiclav(20.9%) . 56 of samples (53.1%) showed no mention of testing of Co-Amoxiclav. On further analysis on best case scenario basis, the sensitivity to co-amoxiclav will be 74% considering all the 56 non-tested samples are sensitive to co-amoxiclav. While on worst case scenario, the sensitivity to co-amoxiclav will be 74% considering all the 56 non-tested samples are resistant to co-amoxiclav.

Conclusion
Use of co-amoxiclav as an empirical antimicrobial treatment for cases of grade II/ III acute cholecystitis is associated with considerable antimicrobial resistance ranges from 25% in the best case scenario and 79% in worst case scenario. The most common organism isolated from these samples was E.coli.
These results are in complete agreement with Tokyo 2018 guidelines, which states that Co-amoxiclav is associated with more than 20% resistance.
HPB SO45 - Level 1 evidence comparing aggressive versus non-aggressive intravenous fluid therapy in acute pancreatitis
Authors: Evans Daisy , Hajibandeh Shahin , Hajibandeh Shahab , Athwal Tejinderjit , Satyadas Thomas 
Published: November 2024

Abstract

Background
Fluid balance in the management of acute pancreatitis (AP) is challenging and has been described as a “double-edged sword” whereby adequate fluids are required to counteract systemic hypovolaemia whilst excessive fluids may exacerbate systemic oedema. Given that data generated from randomised studies are conflicting, the optimal rate and type of fluid resuscitation for AP are yet to be determined. We aimed to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis of all existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate comparative outcomes of aggressive versus non-aggressive intravenous fluid (IVF) therapy in patients with AP.

Method
A systematic search of electronic data sources and bibliographic reference lists were conducted. All RCTs reporting outcomes of aggressive versus non-aggressive IVF therapy in AP were included and their risk of bias were assessed. Effect sizes were determined for overall mortality, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, respiratory failure, pancreatic necrosis, severe pancreatitis, clinical improvement, AKI, and length of stay using random-effects modelling. Trial sequential analysis was conducted to determine risk of types 1 or 2 errors.

Results
Ten RCTs enrolling 993 patients with AP who received aggressive (n = 475) or non-aggressive (n = 518) IVF therapy were included. Aggressive IVF therapy was associated with significantly higher rate of sepsis (OR:2.68, P=0.0005) and longer length of stay (MD:0.94, P&lt;0.00001). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality (RD:0.02, P=0.31), SIRS (OR:0.93, P=0.89), respiratory failure (OR:2.81, P=0.07), pancreatic necrosis (OR:1.98, P = 0.06), clinical improvement (OR:1.12, P=0.83), severe pancreatitis (OR:1.31, P=0.38) or AKI (OR:1.06, P=0.91). Subgroup analysis demonstrated higher morbidity and mortality with aggressive fluids in severe AP. Trial sequential analysis detected risk of type 2 error.

Conclusion
Aggressive IVF therapy may be associated with higher morbidity in patients with acute pancreatitis compared with the non-aggressive approach, particularly in patients with more severe disease. It may also prolong length of hospital stay. The available evidence is subject to type 2 error indicating the need for adequately powered RCTs.
HPB SO53 - Implementation of High Volume-Low Complexity 'GIRFT' lists for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Authors: Mohammed Musab , Basu Soutrik , Abdel-Galil Noor , Saha Arin 
Published: November 2024

Abstract

Background
Waiting times for elective surgery have risen steadily since 2010, with particularly sharp increases after the Covid pandemic. There have been several initiatives to improve theatre productivity and increase operative numbers and these are broadly encompassed within GIRFT standards and the development of the concept of a High Volume-Low Complexity list. Current GIRFT standards recommend six laparoscopic cholecystectomies on an all-day operating list. This study aimed to describe the development and implementation of these lists within out district general hospital setting and outline the key barriers and solutions for other units to learn from.

Method
All patients on the waiting list for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assessed and screened by a panel of consultant surgeons to assess suitability for a HVLC list. Theatre staff, anaesthetists and surgeons were widely consulted within local focus groups and a novel method of remuneration for additional work was developed: a 'cost-per-case (CPC)' remuneration structure was introduced (in contrast to standard remuneration by session time) to ensure productivity and high quality surgery. Operations were carried out on weekend lists in a dedicated accredited Elective Surgical Hub and staff were able to finish the day when all operations were completed.

Results
CPC lists took place from August 2023 to May 2024. All lists had six laparoscopic cholecystectomies or eight hernia repairs (or a combination) in line with GIRFT standards. Overall 124 cholecystectomies were performed and 119 were completed on a day case basis. The remaining 5 patients had a single night stay. There were no returns-to-theatre or major morbidity.
All lists had started by 830AM and the latest finish time throughout the study period was 1525PM. The utilisation of CPC lists contributed to waiting times falling dramatically from over 52 weeks to 28 weeks by the end of the study period.

Conclusion
By utilising a novel form of remuneration, based on volume of work completed rather than time, we were able to maximise productivity without compromising safety whilst developing employment conditions that encouraged colleagues to perform additional work. Key facets to successful implementation include appropriate screening of cases, allowing staff to leave when the work is completed (rather than have to wait till the end of the day) and standardising equipment and kit to reduce wastage and turnaround time between cases. These lessons can be implemented in any surgical unit to improve productivity and increase volume of cases performed.
HPB SO55 - Utilisation of Telephone Assessment Clinic for booking Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Analysis of outcomes and cancellations
Authors: Mohammed Musab , Khan Saadia , Boalot Ahmed , Hasan Mahmudul , Saha Arin 
Published: November 2024

Abstract

Background
Despite extensive efforts to increase productivity after the Covid pandemic, there still remain areas of limited capacity. Face-to-face outpatient clinic provision is yet to return to normal levels, despite significant increases in referrals. Telephone assessment clinics are attractive solutions as they can be performed outside 'standard' operating hours of the hospital and require fewer support staff, giving increased flexibility to consultant and trainee surgeons who perform them. However, it is unclear whether telephone assessment alone is sufficient to book patients onto operating lists. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of telephone assessment alone when booking patients for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Method
A standardised telephone assessment process was developed which included mandatory information about symptoms, past medical and surgical history and body weight. All patients referred for consideration of cholecystectomy from January 2023 to January 2024 received either a telephone or face-to-face clinic appointment; those who received a telephone appointment were not routinely offered face-to-face assessment unless clinically indicated. Patients were listed for laparoscopic cholecystectomy from either clinic and all operations took place on pooled operating lists.
Operative and clinical outcomes were recorded, including cancellations on the day and unexpected anatomy or procedures. Outcomes between telephone and face-to-face appointments were compared.

Results
Over the study period, 189 patients had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy from an elective clinic source. Other sources included those patients who had presented acutely and were discharged and those on semi-acute lists. 106 patients had a telephone assessment as their only prior engagement with surgical services prior to surgery. Of these patients, there was one cancellation on the day (due to absence of symptoms between clinic assessment and date of surgery). Nine patients required cholangiography which had not been initially booked. In contrast, three patients who had had face-to-face assessment were cancelled on the day.

Conclusion
Telephone assessment alone is sufficient to book patients onto an elective theatre list for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with no adverse impact on cancellations and theatre utilisation. To ensure low cancellation rates and safe surgery, senior decision making is required for telephone assessment clinics (in this study, all appointments were carried out by consultant surgeons) and a standardised proforma to ensure all relevant information is recorded. The low rate of cancellations was maintained even though a 'pooled' operating list is utilised in our hospital.
Telephone assessment clinics for first appointments are safe and effective and could help in reducing overall waiting times.