Local Anesthetics Induce Cardiac Toxicity Through Distinct Effects on Calcium Dynamics: Implications For Clinical Prevention
Authors: Plakhotnik Julia , Zhang Libo , Lonnqvist PerArne , Maynes Jason T 
Published: June 2021

INTRODUCTIONThe clinically safe dose of local anesthetics is limited by their induction of potentially lethal cardiac arrhythmias, which occurs in ~50,000 people in the US per year. While this drug toxicity is often attributed to non‐specific block of cardiac sodium channels, studies on isolated channels fail to show any clinically relevant difference between more harmful (i.e. bupivacaine, BUP) and less harmful (i.e. ropivacaine, ROP) anesthetics. We sought to determine the mechanisms of toxicity and arrhythmogenesis for BUP and ROP, revealing prevention and treatment strategies to improve clinical safety.METHODSWe cultured beating 2D‐tissues of human iPSC‐derived cardiomyocytes and treated them with clinically relevant concentrations of BUP or ROP. We then analyzed changes to ion and contractile dynamics using the xCELLigence RTCA Cardio and the cytosolic calcium dye FLIPR5. As an inotrope, calcium was tested for its ability to recover contractile dysfunction. Our in vitro findings were validated in a rat model of BUP toxicity. Anesthetized animals were infused with either saline or CaCl2 (10 mg/kg over 5 min) in the tail vein, followed by either 2 mg/kg/min BUP or ROP, until asystole. Cardiac activity was monitored via ECG and invasive arterial blood pressure recordings, and analysed using non‐linear regression incorporating the effects of drug treatment, sampling time, and animal variability.RESULTSIn human iPSC cardiomyocytes, both anesthetics affected contractility, beat rate, rhythm, excitation‐contraction coupling, and sodium channel activity as expected, with BUP causing a greater adverse effect. BUP, but not ROP, additionally delayed calcium wave duration by 20% and reduced overall calcium flux by 66%. Interestingly, CaCl2 co‐treatment with BUP abolished aberrancy in all toxicity metrics, where CaCl2 co‐treatment with ROP exacerbated toxicity. Further investigation into intracellular calcium dynamics revealed BUP‐specific defects in diastolic and systolic calcium flux, which were mitigated by CaCl2 co‐treatment. Our in vivo model validated these findings, with ROP showing less toxicity than BUP in all observed metrics. CaCl2 pre‐treatment mitigated the BUP‐mediated decline in beat rate and diastolic arterial pressure, but had no effect, or exacerbated outcomes, in ROP‐treated rats. Furthermore, CaCl2 pre‐treatment reduced arrhythmia onset and QRS widening cased by BUP, but exacerbated these arrhythmia metrics and reduced survival with ROP.CONCLUSIONSWe found that BUP, but not ROP, caused a baseline dysfunction in calcium dynamics in human iPSC‐derived cardiomyocytes. Calcium pre‐treatment prevented BUP, but exacerbated ROP cardiotoxicity in both in vitro and in vivo models. Together, our results implicate distinct calcium signaling and dynamics in eliciting the higher clinical cardiotoxicity of the BUP local anesthetic, and show how calcium can be used to protect against the arrhythmogenic effects of BUP overdose.Support or Funding InformationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchThis abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.