Anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Alhumaid Saad , Al Mutair Abbas , Al Alawi Zainab , Rabaan Ali A. , Tirupathi Raghavendra , Alomari Mohammed A. , Alshakhes Aqeel S. , Alshawi Abeer M. , Ahmed Gasmelseed Y. , Almusabeh Hassan M. , Alghareeb Tariq T. , Alghuwainem Abdulaziz A. , Alsulaiman Zainab A. , Alabdulmuhsin Mohammed A. , AlBuwaidi Emad A. , Dukhi Amjad K. Bu , Mufti Hani N. , Al-Qahtani Manaf , Dhama Kuldeep , Al-Tawfiq Jaffar A. , Al-Omari Awad 
Published: October 2021

AbstractBackgroundCurrently there is no systematic review and meta-analysis of the global incidence rates of anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the general adult population.ObjectivesTo estimate the incidence rates of anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions after COVID-19 vaccines and describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, triggers, presenting signs and symptoms, treatment and clinical course of confirmed cases.DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] statement was followed.MethodsElectronic databases (Proquest, Medline, Embase, Pubmed, CINAHL, Wiley online library, and Nature) were searched from 1 December 2020 to 31 May 2021 in the English language using the following keywords alone or in combination:anaphylaxis,non-anaphylaxis,anaphylactic reaction,nonanaphylactic reaction,anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shock,hypersensitivity,allergy reaction,allergic reaction,immunology reaction,immunologic reaction,angioedema,loss of consciousness,generalized erythema,urticaria,urticarial rash,cyanosis,grunting,stridor,tachypnoea,wheezing,tachycardia,abdominal pain,diarrhea,nausea,vomitingandtryptase. We included studies in adults of all ages in all healthcare settings. Effect sizes of prevalence were pooled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To minimize heterogeneity, we performed sub-group analyses.ResultsOf the 1,734 papers that were identified, 26 articles were included in the systematic review (8 case report, 5 cohort, 4 case series, 2 randomized controlled trial and 1 randomized cross-sectional studies) and 14 articles (1 cohort, 2 case series, 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 randomized cross-sectional studies) were included in meta-analysis. Studies involving 26,337,421 vaccine recipients [Pfizer-BioNTech (n = 14,505,399) and Moderna (n = 11,831,488)] were analyzed. The overall pooled prevalence estimate of anaphylaxis to both vaccines was 5.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 7.2,I2 = 81%,p =  < 0.0001), while the overall pooled prevalence estimate of nonanaphylactic reactions to both vaccines was 53.9 (95% CI 0.0 to 116.1,I2 = 99%,p =  < 0.0001). Vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech resulted in higher anaphylactic reactions compared to Moderna (8.0, 95% CI 0.0 to 11.3,I2 = 85% versus 2.8, 95% CI 0.0 to 5.7,I2 = 59%). However, lower incidence of nonanaphylactic reactions was associated with Pfizer-BioNTech compared to Moderna (43.9, 95% CI 0.0 to 131.9,I2 = 99% versus 63.8, 95% CI 0.0 to 151.8,I2 = 98%). The funnel plots for possible publication bias for the pooled effect sizes to determine the incidence of anaphylaxis and nonanaphylactic reactions associated with mRNA COVID-19 immunization based on mRNA vaccine type appeared asymmetrical on visual inspection, and Egger’s tests confirmed asymmetry by producingpvalues < 0.05. Across the included studies, the most commonly identified risk factors for anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were female sex and personal history of atopy. The key triggers to anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions identified in these studies included foods, medications, stinging insects or jellyfish, contrast media, cosmetics and detergents, household products, and latex. Previous history of anaphylaxis; and comorbidities such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic and contact eczema/dermatitis and psoriasis and cholinergic urticaria were also found to be important.ConclusionThe prevalence of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-associated anaphylaxis is very low; and nonanaphylactic reactions occur at higher rate, however, cutaneous reactions are largely self-limited. Both anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions should not discourage vaccination.