bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
An efficient hybrid system for anomaly detection in social networks
Authors: Rahman Md. Shafiur , Halder Sajal , Uddin Md. Ashraf , Acharjee Uzzal Kumar 
Published: March 2021

AbstractAnomaly detection has been an essential and dynamic research area in the data mining. A wide range of applications including different social medias have adopted different state-of-the-art methods to identify anomaly for ensuring user’s security and privacy. The social network refers to a forum used by different groups of people to express their thoughts, communicate with each other, and share the content needed. This social networks also facilitate abnormal activities, spread fake news, rumours, misinformation, unsolicited messages, and propaganda post malicious links. Therefore, detection of abnormalities is one of the important data analysis activities for the identification of normal or abnormal users on the social networks. In this paper, we have developed a hybrid anomaly detection method named DT-SVMNB that cascades several machine learning algorithms including decision tree (C5.0), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naïve Bayesian classifier (NBC) for classifying normal and abnormal users in social networks. We have extracted a list of unique features derived from users’ profile and contents. Using two kinds of dataset with the selected features, the proposed machine learning model called DT-SVMNB is trained. Our model classifies users as depressed one or suicidal one in the social network. We have conducted an experiment of our model using synthetic and real datasets from social network. The performance analysis demonstrates around 98% accuracy which proves the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed system.
Variability of computed tomography angiography coverage of lung parenchyma in acute stroke
Authors: Pfaff Johannes A. R. , Füssel Bianka , Harlan Marcial E. , Hubert Alexander , Bendszus Martin 
Published: March 2021

Abstract
Background
Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the head and neck during acute ischemic stroke (AIS) usually includes visualization of lung apices. The possibility to evaluate for pulmonary changes, e.g. peripheral ground-glass and consolidative opacities suggestive of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–related pneumonia, depends on the area of the lung covered by CTA.

Methods
We performed an analysis of a real-world scenario assessing the variability of lung coverage on CTA in patients presenting with AIS to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) or to one of eight primary stroke centers (PSC) within a teleradiological network covered by the comprehensive stroke center in 2019.

Results
Our final analysis included n = 940 CTA, and in n = 573 (61%) merely lung apices were covered. In 19/940 (2%) of patients no lung tissue was covered by CTA. CTA scanning protocols in the CSC began significantly more frequently at the level of the ascending aorta (CSC: n = 180 (38.2%), PSC: n = 127 (27.1%), p-value < 0.001) and the aortic arch (CSC: n = 140 (29.7%), PSC: n = 83 (17.7%), p-value < 0.001), and by this covered less frequently the lower lobes compared to CTA acquired in one of the PSC.

Conclusions
In our pre-COVID-19 pandemic representative stroke patient cohort, CTA for AIS covered most often only lung apices. In 37% of the patients CTA visualized at least parts of the lower lobes, the lingula or the middle lobe allowing for a more extensive assessment of the lungs.
Network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the efficacy of enzalutamide versus apalutamide, darolutamide, and bicalutamide for treatment of nonmetastatic (nm) castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
Authors: Beer Tomasz M. , Saad Fred , Sternberg Cora N. , Hussain Maha H. A. , Ganguli Arijit , Bhadauria Hemant Singh , Oh Mok , Skaltsa Konstantina , Tombal Bertrand 
Published: March 2021

101 Background: Enzalutamide is a potent androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor, targeting multiple steps in AR signaling. In recent years, the EMA and FDA approved enzalutamide for the management of adults with CRPC, irrespective of metastatic status, based on the Phase 3 PROSPER clinical trial results. To provide indirect evidence on the relative efficacy of enzalutamide vs bicalutamide or the second-generation AR antagonists apalutamide and darolutamide for the management of nmCRPC, a NMA was performed using published data from their Phase 3 clinical trials. Methods: NMA enables indirect comparison of ≥3 interventions across a network of studies, identified by systematic literature review and based on a common comparator, to estimate relative effects between interventions. This NMA compared data from PROSPER (enzalutamide vs placebo [PBO]), SPARTAN (apalutamide vs PBO), ARAMIS (darolutamide vs PBO), and STRIVE (enzalutamide vs bicalutamide) studies, following NICE technical support document 2. Four key endpoints (metastasis-free survival [MFS], overall survival [OS], time to prostate-specific antigen progression [TTPP], and time to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy [TTCH]) were assessed. It was assumed that there was no variation between studies that could influence the size of treatment effect. Fixed-effect models were developed and implemented under a Bayesian framework. Results: MFS, OS, and TTCH outcomes of PROSPER, SPARTAN, and ARAMIS were compared between androgen deprivation treatment alone and in combination with enzalutamide/apalutamide/darolutamide. TTPP of PROSPER, SPARTAN, ARAMIS, and STRIVE was compared between enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide, bicalutamide, and PBO. Enzalutamide showed significant benefit vs PBO for all endpoints measured (median hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, 0.73, 0.54, 0.07 for MFS, OS, TTCH, TTPP respectively, Table), vs darolutamide for MFS HR 0.71, and vs darolutamide HR 0.51 and bicalutamide HR 0.18 for TTPP. OS for enzalutamide vs apalutamide was not statistically different HR 0.94. Conclusions: Enzalutamide showed significant therapeutic benefit; MFS, OS, TTCH, and TTPP were better vs PBO and MFS and/or TTPP were longer compared to darolutamide and bicalutamide. No statistically significant differences were observed between enzalutamide and apalutamide. This NMA may facilitate the development and testing of treatment strategies for nmCRPC. [Table: see text]
Final results of a phase I/II prospective dose escalation trial evaluating safety and efficacy of combination 177Lu PSMA 617 and NOX66 in men with end-stage metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPIN trial).
Authors: Pathmanandavel Sarennya , Crumbaker Megan , Yam Andrew On Wah , Rofe Christopher , Ho Bao , Chan Wai Ling , Sharma Shikha , Hickey Adam James , Kongrak Kamonwan , Ratnayake Lalith , Kwan Edmond Michael , Azad Arun , Eu Peter , Nguyen Andrew , Joshua Anthony M. , Emmett Louise 
Published: March 2021

103 Background: 177LuPSMA – 617 is a promising therapy for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, treatment resistance occurs frequently and synergistic combination therapy may improve outcomes. We combined 177LuPSMA – 617 with idronoxil (NOX66), an inhibitor of external NADH oxidase type 2 with radio-sensitizing properties. We present the final safety and efficacy results. Methods: Men with progressive mCRPC after androgen signalling inhibition (ASI) and taxane chemotherapy were enrolled. Key inclusion criteria were: PSMA PET/CT intensity SUV max > 15 with no discordant disease on FDG PET/CT, haemoglobin > 100g/L, platelets > 100x109/L and eGFR > 40mls/min. Enrolled patients received up to six doses of 177 Lu-PSMA 617 (7.5Gbq) day 1 every 6 weeks in combination with NOX66 days 1-10 each cycle. Cohort 1 (n = 8) received 400mg NOX66. Following safety reviews the doses were escalated in cohorts 2 (n = 24) and 3 (n = 24) to 800mg and 1200mg of NOX66, respectively. Blood samples were prospectively collected for androgen receptor splice variant 7 (ARV7) expression. PSMA and FDG PET/CT were performed at study entry and on progression. The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability; the secondary outcomes evaluated were efficacy, pain scores, and quality of life. Results: Of the 56 men enrolled, all had received prior treatment with ASI and docetaxel, and 95% (53/56) had prior cabazitaxel. 96% (54/56) patients received ≥2 cycles and 46% (26/56) completed six cycles of treatment. Adverse events are summarized in the table below. PSA responses were as follows: 86% (48/56) had any PSA reduction and 61% (34/56) had > 50% PSA reduction. 84% (47/56) have had PSA progression to date with median follow up 18.9 months (95% CI 11.9-25.8). Median PSA PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI 6.0-9.0). 55% (31/56) have died and median overall survival was 19.7 months (95% CI 10.7-28.7). 34/56 men had baseline pain scores ≥3, of whom 53% (18/34) had significant reduction in pain indicators. There was no correlation between quantitative PET results and either PSA > 50% response, PSA PFS or OS. Conclusions: The combination of 177 Lu-PSMA 617 + NOX66 appears safe and efficacious in men with heavily pre-treated mCRPC. Exploratory analysis of ARV7 expression and quantitative PET imaging markers of treatment response and resistance is in progress. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12618001073291. [Table: see text]
Impact of concomitant prostate cancer therapy on efficacy and safety of relugolix versus leuprolide in men with advanced prostate cancer: Subgroup analysis from the phase III HERO study.
Authors: George Daniel J. , Shore Neal D. , Saad Fred , Cookson Michael , Saltzstein Daniel , Tutrone Ronald F. , Akaza Hideyuki , Bossi Alberto , Wong Elaine K. , Selby Bryan , Fan Xiaolin , Walling Jackie , Tombal Bertrand 
Published: March 2021

106 Background: In the phase 3 HERO study, the oral GnRH receptor antagonist, relugolix, demonstrated suppression of testosterone to castrate levels in 96.7% of patients, which was superior to leuprolide, and a 54% lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events relative to leuprolide. To characterize the impact of concomitant prostate cancer treatments with the use of relugolix in advanced prostate cancer from the HERO study, a subgroup analysis for patients receiving various therapies was undertaken. Methods: The HERO study was designed to evaluate relugolix in men with advanced prostate cancer. Overall, 934 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive relugolix 120 mg orally once daily or leuprolide injections every 12 weeks for 48 weeks. In the setting of rising PSA, patients could receive enzalutamide (ENZ) or docetaxel (DOC) 2 months after study initiation. Assessments included sustained testosterone suppression to castrate levels (<50 ng/dL) through 48 weeks and safety parameters. Subgroups analyzed included patients with or without concomitant ENZ, DOC, and any radiation therapy (RT). A sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint was performed excluding patients who received concomitant therapies that may affect testosterone. Results: Overall, 125 patients (13.4%) took at least one concomitant therapy that could impact testosterone levels. RT was received by 15.9% and 18.8% of patients in the relugolix and leuprolide groups, respectively. ENZ was the most frequently used therapy in the relugolix group (2.7%), with similar use in the leuprolide group (1.9%). DOC was used by 1.3% and 1.6% of patients in the relugolix and leuprolide groups, respectively. All other relevant concomitant therapy were used in <1% of population. The sensitivity analysis results indicated that use of these concomitant therapy that could affect testosterone levels did not impact the primary endpoint. Castration rates were similar with and without concomitant use of ENZ and DOC, or RT (table). No clinically relevant differences in adverse events were observed between patients with or without concomitant use of ENZ, DOC, or RT in either treatment group. Conclusions: While the numbers are small, treatment with relugolix was associated with a similar efficacy and safety profiles in patients who received concomitant administration of ENZ, DOC, or RT to that observed in patients not receiving those concomitant treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT03085095. [Table: see text]
SPOP mutations in prostate cancer: Clinical and genomic features.
Authors: Nakazawa Mari , Fang Mike , Issacsson Velho Pedro , Antonarakis Emmanuel S. 
Published: March 2021

151 Background: Point mutations in the gene encoding speckle-type pox virus and zinc finger protein (SPOP) are the most frequently identified mutations in prostate cancer, occurring at a frequency of 6-15% across localized and disseminated cancers. Recently, SPOP gene alterations have gained attention as they appear to define a novel subclass of prostate cancers. Previous studies show that patients with mutant SPOP (mtSPOP) had superior responses to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and exhibit more favorable responses to abiraterone compared to wild type SPOP (wtSPOP). Methods: We retrospectively identified 59 prostate cancer patients at a single institution (Johns Hopkins) with somatic SPOP mutations from genomic testing of primary tumors (n=45), metastatic lesions (n=12), or liquid biopsies (n=2). Patient records were reviewed to determine baseline characteristics, therapies received, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcomes included best PSA response and progression-free survival (PFS) on ADT in the hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) setting and on abiraterone and/or enzalutamide in the first-line castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) setting. PFS was defined as either PSA, radiographic, or clinical progression. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range 46 to 85). 17/59 (28.8%) were Black. F133 was the most frequently mutated residue, occurring in 33 (55.9%) instances (Table). There were two patients who harbored two mutations in the SPOP gene. The most frequently co-occurring mutation was in APC (15/59 [25.4%] patients), resulting in Wnt pathway activation. Concurrent ERG fusions were not observed with this cohort (0/59 [0%] patients). 41/59 (69.4%) were diagnosed with Gleason 8-10 disease. 21/59 (35.5%) were diagnosed with de novo metastatic disease. 50/59 (84.7%) patients received ADT for recurrent or metastatic disease. Median PFS on ADT was 40.7 (95% CI 23.4-71.9) months. Of the 27/59 (45.8%) patients who progressed to CRPC, 20/59 (33.9%) patients received abiraterone and 13/59 (22.0%) received enzalutamide; 9/59 (15.3%) patients received both agents. Median PFS was 7.8 (95% CI 6.7-NR) months on abiraterone and 7.3 (95% CI 3.2-NR) months on enzalutamide. Other notable therapies received in the CRPC setting include docetaxel (5/59 [8.5%] patients), cabazitaxel (5/59 [8.5%] patients), and PARP inhibitor olaparib or rucaparib (4/59 [6.8%] patients). Conclusions: SPOP mutations define a unique subset of prostate cancers enriched for black patients, high Gleason scores, absence of ERG fusions, and Wnt pathway activation. Clinical outcomes to first-line ADT appear longer than expected for genomically-unselected patients. [Table: see text]
Racial disparities in depression incidence, management, and mortality after prostate cancer diagnosis.
Authors: Parikh Ravi Bharat , Gallo Joseph J. , Cashy John , Robinson Kyle William , Narayan Vivek , Wong Yu-Ning , Jayadevappa Ravishankar , Chhatre Sumedha 
Published: March 2021

201 Background: Depressive disorder is a common cause of morbidity among men with prostate cancer (PC) and may contribute to known racial disparities in PC outcomes. We estimated the incidence, management, and impact of depressive disorder (depression) on overall mortality among African American (AA) and non-Hispanic White (W) Veterans with localized PC. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used linked administrative, survey, and electronic health record data from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse to identify AA and W Veterans with no preexisting depression who were diagnosed with localized PC between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2013. Patients were followed through December 31, 2019. The primary outcomes were incident depression (defined from diagnosis codes and PHQ-2 and -9 screenings between six months to five years after PC diagnosis), receipt of anti-depressant therapy, and all-cause mortality. We used logistic and Cox regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic factors, PSA, Gleason score, and prostate cancer treatment, to estimate associations with all outcomes, using race-by-depression and race-by-treatment interaction terms to investigate racial disparities. Results: Among 32,194 Veterans diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (median age 67 years [interquartile range [IQR] 62 to 73 years], median follow-up 9.9 years [IQR 8.0 to 12.1 years]), 8,177 (25.4%) were AA. Overall, 8,285 (25.7%) Veterans were diagnosed with depression after PC diagnosis, and 2,525 (30.5%) of depressed Veterans received an antidepressant. Compared to Veterans without depression, Veterans with incident depression had higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.30 [95% CI 1.25-1.35]). Race moderated all outcomes: AAs were more likely than Ws to be diagnosed with depression. However, among those with depression, AAs were less likely than Ws to receive an antidepressant. Interaction analyses showed that the HR of all-cause mortality associated with depression among AAs was significantly greater than that of Ws. Antidepressant receipt was not associated with improved mortality (aHR 1.05 [95% CI 0.97-1.13]); this finding was not moderated by race. Conclusions: Depression was common among men with prostate cancer within a large equal-access health care system, and African American men had more adverse depression-related outcomes than White men. Identifying and managing incident depression should be a key target of efforts to improve prostate cancer outcomes and disparities. [Table: see text]
Frequency, management, and resource use of adverse events (AEs) in nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients receiving apalutamide or enzalutamide: A real-world study.
Authors: Jiang Shan , Varghese Della , Appukkuttan Sreevalsa , Corman Shelby , Kebede Nehemiah , Gnanasakthy Kajan , Macahilig Cynthia , Waldeck A. Reginald , Hussain Arif 
Published: March 2021

217 Background: Second generation androgen receptor inhibitors (SGARIs), apalutamide (APA) and enzalutamide (ENZ) and darolutamide, are approved in the United States (US) for the treatment of nmCRPC. The objectives of this study were to describe the frequency of AEs and actions taken to manage AEs among nmCRPC patients treated with APA or ENZ and their downstream resource implications. Methods: This is a further descriptive analysis of a retrospective chart review study conducted in 43 US nmCRPC-treating sites. In our sample, the 43 physicians identified 699 nmCRPC patients initiating treatment with APA (N = 368) or ENZ (N = 333) with 2 patients receiving both, between February 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 and AEs were collected as reported in regular clinical practice. A representative subset of patients, experiencing at least 1 AE for either APA (N = 125) or ENZ (N = 125), were selected randomly from the initial cohort, and their detailed chart data were extracted to understand the actions taken to manage AEs. Results: Of the initial cohort of nmCRPC patients, 72.0% and 78.7% of men receiving APA (N = 368) and ENZ (N = 333) experienced ≥1 AE, respectively. The three most common AEs reported were fatigue/asthenia (APA, 30.2%; ENZ, 38.7%), hot flush (APA, 14.1%; ENZ, 13.5%), and arthralgia (APA, 14.4%; ENZ, 12.9%). Cognitive and mental changes were observed in 5.4% (APA) and 7.8% (ENZA) men. The subset analysis of randomly selected patients experiencing ≥1 AE (APA, 125; ENZ, 125) were mostly Caucasian (APA, 72.8%; ENZ, 71.2%), ECOG score 0-1 (APA, 84%; ENZ, 88%), median prostate specific antigen (PSA) value 13 ng/ml and 11 ng/ml (APA, ENZ; respectively). Actions to address AEs included treatment of AE, SGARI discontinuation, dose reduction and hospitalization (Table). Specifically, treatment discontinuation due to AE was observed in 8.0% (APA) and 12.8 (%) of men. AEs were often not resolved (APA, 43.6%; ENZ, 39.4%), and the median duration of days to resolve AEs were 60.0 for APA and 56.0 for ENZ. Conclusions: This real-world study highlights the clinical and resource use burden of AEs among nmCRPC patients treated with APA and ENZ. The results demonstrate the importance of safety and tolerability as key considerations in shared clinician-patient decision-making regarding SGARI therapy in nmCRPC. [Table: see text]
Phase 3 trial of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) or everolimus (EVE) versus sunitinib (SUN) monotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (CLEAR study).
Authors: Motzer Robert J. , Porta Camillo , Eto Masatoshi , Powles Thomas , Grünwald Viktor , Hutson Thomas E. , Alekseev Boris , Rha Sun Young , Kopyltsov Evgeny , Méndez Vidal María José , Hong Sung-Hoo , Kapoor Anil , Alonso Gordoa Teresa , Goh Jeffrey C. , Merchan Jaime R. , Smith Alan D. , Mody Kalgi , Perini Rodolfo F. , Xing Dongyuan , Choueiri Toni K. 
Published: March 2021

269 Background: In pts with advanced RCC, second-line treatment with LEN + EVE prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with EVE alone. LEN + PEMBRO, also showed preliminary efficacious evidence in a phase 1/2 RCC study. Here, we describe the investigational study results of first-line LEN + PEMBRO or LEN + EVE versus SUN in pts with advanced RCC. Methods: Pts were randomized (1:1:1) to receive LEN 20 mg orally once daily + PEMBRO 200 mg IV every 3 weeks (wks); or LEN 18 mg + EVE 5 mg orally once daily; or SUN 50 mg orally once daily (4 wks on/2 wks off). Eligible pts had advanced RCC with no prior systemic therapy. Randomization was stratified by geographic region and MSKCC prognostic group. The primary endpoint was PFS by Independent Review Committee per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. A sequential approach was used to test PFS first, then OS and ORR. PFS and OS were compared across arms by a stratified log-rank test; hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by a stratified Cox regression model. Results: 1069 pts were randomized (Table). After a median follow-up of 27 months (data cutoff August 28, 2020), PFS was significantly improved with LEN + PEMBRO (median 24 months [mos]) vs SUN (median 9 mos; HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.32–0.49) and LEN + EVE (median 15 mos) vs SUN (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53–0.80). OS was significantly longer with LEN + PEMBRO vs SUN (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49–0.88), whereas OS with LEN + EVE vs SUN was not statistically different (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.88–1.50). ORR was significantly greater with LEN + PEMBRO (ORR 71%; complete response [CR] 16%) vs SUN (ORR 36%; CR 4%; odds ratio 4.35, 95% CI 3.16–5.97) and LEN + EVE (ORR 54%; CR 10%) vs SUN (odds ratio 2.15, 95% CI 1.57–2.93). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 72% of pts in the LEN + PEMBRO arm and 73% of pts in the LEN + EVE arm compared with 59% of pts in the SUN arm. Conclusions: LEN + PEMBRO demonstrated significant improvements in PFS, OS and ORR vs SUN. LEN + EVE demonstrated significant improvements in PFS and ORR vs SUN. Safety was manageable and consistent with the known single-agent profiles. Clinical trial information: NCT02811861 . [Table: see text]