POS0955 EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEIN TURNOVER MARKERS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH axSpA – A COMPARISON WITH CONTROL SUBJECTS WITH OR WITHOUT PELVIC, BUTTOCK OR BACK PAIN
Authors: Port H. , Holm Nielsen S. , Blair J. , Madsen S. F. , Bay-Jensen A. C. , Karsdal M. , Seven S. , Sørensen I. J. , Morsel-Carlsen L. , Østergaard M. , Juhl Pedersen S. 
Published: May 2021

Background:Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a common chronic inflammatory disease, associated with extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling of the cartilage, bone and connective tissues. The primary symptom of axSpA is back pain, caused by inflammation. However, there is a medical need to truly identify patients with axSpA from other subjects with buttock or low back pain attributable to other reasons. Tissue-derived extracellular (ECM) markers quantified in serum may serve to differentiate axSpA patients from other diagnostic entities.Objectives:To investigate circulating ECM turnover markers as potential biomarkers to differentiate patients with axSpA from a control group of subjects with buttock or pelvic pain attributed to other reasons, including postpartum women and healthy subjects.Methods:Biomarkers of ECM degradation/chronic inflammation (C1M, C3M, C4M, C6M, CRPM, C10C and COL10NC) and ECM formation (PRO-C3 and PRO-C6) were measured in 204 participants from the MASH study [1] (Table 1). Biomarker levels were compared among patients with axSpA and control group, and two new variables (Type 3 and Type 6) were included, corresponding to the index of formation/degradation of type III and type VI collagen respectively. The biomarker data was log10 transformed for normalization when necessary and linear regression models with pairwise comparisons were performed. Clinical scores and the SPARCC MRI scores for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) inflammation were correlated with the biomarkers data (data not shown).Table 1.Comparison of blood-tested biomarkers levels in MASH study. Data was adjusted for confounders age, gender, and body mass index (BMI).Biomarkers(Mean (SD))Patientswith axSpA(n = 41)Control groups (n=163)pC1M84.3 (85.8)36.2 (22.1)<0.0001C3M15.6 (4.0)13.9 (3.0)0.011C4M34.9 (10.2)27.9 (7.7)<0.0001C6M20.5 (5.8)17.4 (4.2)<0.0001CRPM11.9 (2.9)11.0 (5.9)0.027C10C2567 (462)2568 (560)0.31COL10NC9.15 (5.81)9.43 (8.27)0.43PRO_C310.2 (2.5)11.3 (3.0)0.0052PRO_C66.94 (2.45)6.86 (2.53)0.93Type 3 (PRO-C3/C3M)0.70 (0.28)0.86 (0.31)0.0004Type 6 (PRO-C6/C6M)0.36 (0.16)0.41 (0.14)0.0024Results:We found that patients with axSpA had significantly increased MMP-mediated degradation of type I (C1M), type III (C3M), type IV (C4M) and type VI (C6M) collagens (p<0.0001, p=0.01,p<0.001,p<0.001, respectively), and CRP-metabolite (CRPM, p=0.027), and significantly decreased formation of type III collagen (p= 0.052) compared with control groups when adjusting for age, gender and body mass index (BMI). Significantly decreased rates of Type 3 and Type 6 variables were also observed in patients with axSpA (p=0.004, p=0.002, respectively). We further adjusted the analyses by the SPARCC SIJ inflammation scores since differences in these were found among the two groups [1], and similar differences in biomarker levels were found, indicating that the relationship between the level of biomarkers and the SPARCC SIJ inflammation scores was independent between the two groups.Conclusion:Biomarkers of type I, III, IV and V collagen and a CRP-metabolite showed an altered turnover in patients with axSpA compared with the control group including subjects with or without buttock or pelvic pain attributable to other reasons. Such biomarkers may be used in combination with MRI or independently to separate patients with axSpA from other back pain conditions.References:[1]Seven, S., Østergaard, M., Morsel-Carlsen, L., Sørensen, I. J., Bonde, B., Thamsborg, G., ... & Pedersen, S. J. (2019). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lesions in the Sacroiliac Joints for Differentiation of Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis From Control Subjects With or Without Pelvic or Buttock Pain: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study of 204 Participants. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 71(12), 2034-2046.Acknowledgements:The study was supported by Innovation Fund Denmark, Rigshospitalet and the Danish Rheumatism Association (grant no. R102-A2132-B98, R159-A5061 and R150-A4467-B98).Disclosure of Interests:Helena Port Employee of: Industrial PhD student at Nordic Bioscience and University of Copenhagen, Signe Holm Nielsen Employee of: Full time employee at Nordic Bioscience, Joseph Blair Employee of: Full time employee at Nordic Bioscience, Sofie Falkenløve Madsen Employee of: Full time employee at Nordic Bioscience A/S, Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen Shareholder of: Nordic Bioscience A/S, Employee of: Full time employee at Nordic Bioscience A/S, Morten Karsdal Shareholder of: Nordic Bioscience A/S, Employee of: Full time employee at Nordic Bioscience A/S, Sengül Seven: None declared, Inge Juul Sørensen: None declared, Lone Morsel-Carlsen: None declared, Mikkel Østergaard: None declared, Susanne Juhl Pedersen: None declared