Phase II/III study of SM-88 in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Chung Vincent , Chawla Sant P. , Dong Huan , Kim Semmie , Korn Ronald Lee , Lim Kian-Huat , Noel Marcus Smith , Noonan Anne M. , Oberstein Paul Eliezer , Ocean Allyson J. , Pant Shubham , Picozzi Vincent J. , Philip Philip Agop , Rosemurgy Alexander , Tan Benjamin R. , Wang-Gillam Andrea , Wong Steve , Del Priore Giuseppe 
Published: January 2021

437 Background: SM-88 (racemetyrosine, Tyme Inc) is a dysfunctional tyrosine derivative used with MPS (methoxsalen 10mg, phenytoin 50mg and sirolimus 0.5mg). SM-88 was well tolerated with improvement in survival among select heavily pretreated PDAC patients who achieved stable disease (HR 0.08, p = 0.02) (Noel et al. Annal Oncol 2019). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were prognostic in identifying a PDAC subgroup that may be more likely to benefit from SM-88. Preliminary radiomic analysis of the largest metastases at baseline correlated with baseline CTCs (Ocean et al, Annal Oncol 2019). Here we describe the subsequent randomized portion of the trial in third-line patients only, of SM-88 vs physician/patient choice chemotherapy, to evaluate the potential role of SM-88 in metastatic PDAC through analysis of CTCs and passively acquired biometrics data from a wearable device. Methods:Prospective open-label RCT (Tyme 88 Panc Part 2, NCT03512756) after 2 prior lines for metastatic PDAC. A cell adhesion matrix (CAM) was used to enrich solitary CTCs and cells in clusters floating in the medium after 24 hour culture. Isolated CTCs were collected each cycle on day 1, isolated, and enumerated by flow cytometry using the epithelial cell surface marker Epi+ and cellular uptake of green fluorescent labeled CAM (GCAM+). Results:As of Sept 15, 67 subjects were consented. Randomized and evaluable subjects (n=38) included: mean age 65y (45-86); BMI 24.6 (18.8-38.7); female 39.5%; White 76.3%. Of treated subjects 65.8% (25/38) had 166 AEs, with 25.7% (26/101) being at least possibly SM-88-related, with 1 Grade 3. Four CTC subpopulations defined by GCAM, Epi+ and cluster status, were enumerated and correlated to each other (r=0.03-0.71). At least one CTC subpopulation was detected at baseline (mean 33.8 cells/2mL) in all subjects (n=27). The longest metastatic lesion diameter at baseline correlated with baseline CTCs (r=0.55 for Epi+ cluster; r=0.52 for GCAM+ cluster). CTCs were successfully separated and enumerated at each cycle for correlation with survival, response and other parameters. The median baseline daily step count during the first two weeks on treatment was 3993.8 (IQR: 2745.6 - 5078) for those alive vs. 689.3 (IQR: 630.0-2083.6) among deaths in evaluable subjects (p = NS). Passively acquired mean heart rate during week 3 on trial was 89.3 (SD 10.5) among those who died vs. 78.0 (SD 9.2) among those living; medians are 87.0 for deaths vs. 79.2 for alive (p= NS). Conclusions: In a preliminary exploratory analysis, passively acquired biometrics from a wearable device can be collected for correlation with other clinical outcomes. CTC collection and enumeration is also feasible for correlation with traditional trial outcomes. Given that the longest lesion diameter is correlated with CTCs at baseline, additional radiologic feature analysis (eg radiomics) may be important predictor of CTCs. SM-88 was well tolerated with no treatment-related Grade 4 or 5 events. Clinical trial information: NCT03512756.