ARC-6: A phase 1b/2, open-label, randomized platform study to evaluate efficacy and safety of etrumadenant (AB928)-based treatment combinations in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Authors: Subudhi Sumit Kumar , Bendell Johanna C. , Carducci Michael Anthony , Kopp Lisa M. , Scott Jennifer , Grady Michele M , Gardner Olivia , Wise David R 
Published: June 2021

5039 Background: Standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy may contribute to immunosuppression by elevating intratumoral levels of adenosine, activating the A2a and A2b receptors on immune cells. Extracellular adenosine is primarily produced by the enzyme CD73; in prostate cancer, additional adenosine is also produced by the highly expressed protein, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). Etrumadenant (etruma) is an orally bioavailable, small-molecule, selective dual adenosine receptor antagonist and has been well tolerated in dose escalation studies as monotherapy or combined with chemo/immunotherapy. Adenosine axis inhibition combined with SOC regimens and/or immunotherapy may have a synergistic effect on the induction of sustained antitumor immunity against mCRPC. Initial results from the etruma + zimberelimab (zim; antiPD-1 mAb) + docetaxel (doc) arm are presented herein. Methods: ARC-6 (NCT04381832) is an ongoing, phase 1b/2, open-label, multicohort platform study to evaluate efficacy and safety of etruma combination therapy. All eligible patients (pts) have mCRPC that has progressed on androgen deprivation therapy and are checkpoint inhibitor-naive; additionally, for this arm, pts must be androgen signaling inhibitor (ASI)-experienced and taxane-naive. Study pts receive 150 mg etruma orally once daily + 360 mg zim IV every 3 weeks + SOC doc (EZD). The primary objectives are to evaluate safety and antitumor activity (prostate-specific antigen [PSA], radiographic, and composite response rates) of EZD. PSA levels are assessed every 3 weeks, and radiographic scans are performed every 12 weeks. PSA response-evaluable pts have baseline (BL) + ≥2 consecutive post-BL PSA assessments; radiographic response-evaluable pts have RECIST measurable or non-measurable disease per BL imaging + ≥1 post-BL radiographic assessment. Results: As of 22Jan2021, 17 pts have received EZD in phase 1b; 14 are PSA response-evaluable and 8 are radiographic response-evaluable. 15 (88%) pts reported treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs); the most common ( > 30%) were lymphocyte count decreased and neutrophil count decreased (7 pts each; 41%), and hyponatremia and alopecia (6 pts each; 35%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related TEAEs were reported by 9 pts (53%). As of 22Jan2021, 16 pts were continuing treatment; median time on EZD for all pts was 9.9 weeks (0.127.4+ weeks). In response-evaluable pts, PSA response rate was 36% (5/14), radiographic response rate was 38% (3/8; 1 CR), and the composite response rate was 43% (6/14). Conclusions: Phase 1b results indicate that EZD treatment in pts with mCRPC had a manageable safety profile and was associated with clinical benefit. Having met phase 2 advancement criteria, randomized pt enrollment to EZD vs. doc is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04381832.