In vitro maturation without gonadotropins versus in vitro fertilization with hyperstimulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
Authors: Zheng Xiaoying , Guo Wei , Zeng Lin , Zheng Danni , Yang Shuo , Xu Yalan , Wang Lina , Wang Rui , Mol Ben Willem , Li Rong , Qiao Jie 
Published: November 2021

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION
Does in vitro maturation (IVM) result in non-inferior cumulative live birth rates compared to those after standard in vitro fertilization (IVF) in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)?

SUMMARY ANSWER
One cycle of IVM, without any stimulation, was inferior to one cycle of standard IVF in women with PCOS in terms of 6-month cumulative live birth rates, when choosing single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
IVM is an emerging alternative treatment for women with PCOS who need assisted reproductive technology. Since a minimal or even zero dose of gonadotropins are required in the IVM procedure, the occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is eliminated. Only one clinical trial comparing the pregnancy outcome between IVM with FSH priming and IVF has been reported. However, it is still unknown whether IVM treatment without any stimulation can offer a similar live birth outcome in women with PCOS as compared to that in women receiving the standard IVF procedure with ovarian stimulation.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This single-centre, open-label randomized controlled non-inferiority trial in an academic infertility centre in China was performed between March 2018 and July 2019.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Women aged 20–38 years with PCOS and infertility scheduled for their first IVF attempt were eligible. In total, 351 women were randomly allocated to receive one cycle of unstimulated IVM (n = 175) or one cycle of standard IVF with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol and hCG as ovulatory trigger (n = 176). A freeze-all and single blastocyst transfer strategy was used in both groups. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy (leading to live birth) within 6 months after randomization. A non-inferiority margin of 15% was considered.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
The IVM procedure without additional gonadotropin resulted in a lower ongoing pregnancy (leading to live birth) within 6 months after randomization compared to standard IVF treatment (22.3% vs. 50.6%; rate difference −28.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −37.9% to −18.7%). Moderate-severe OHSS did not occur in the IVM group, while in the IVF group, ten women (5.7%) had moderate OHSS and one woman (0.6%) had severe OHSS. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of obstetric and perinatal complications.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
The trial was conducted using an IVM protocol without additional stimulation in a single centre, which may limit its generalizability. In addition, a GnRH agonist trigger rather than hCG for IVF stimulation in women with PCOS would be more consistent with current clinical practice.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
Although IVM is considered to be a convenient, inexpensive and safe alternative to IVF for women with PCOS, our results indicated that one cycle of IVM without any stimulation was inferior to one cycle of standard IVF in terms of the cumulative live birth rate. The inferiority of IVM without ovarian stimulation could be mainly due to the limitations in the developmental potential of embryos. Further IVM development should be tested and validated in a freeze-only and blastocyst transfer setting. Further RCTs are needed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of other IVM protocols or multiple cycles of IVM compared to IVF.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1000201 and 2018YFC1002104) and the National Science Foundation of China (81730038). B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). All other authors declare no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03463772.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE
29 January 2018.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT
16 March 2018.