bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Using SBAR in psychiatry: findings from two london hospitals
Authors: Janaway Benjamin , Zinchenko Ruslan , Anwar Lubna , Wadlow Clare , Soda Edwin , Cove Karen 
Published: June 2021

AimsWe aimed to evaluate the use of the Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation communication tool (SBAR) at two large psychiatric hospitals, in order to design new approaches to teach and reinforce its sustained use. In doing so we hope to improve communication, staff experience and outcomes for patients.We hypothesised that use prior to intervention would be low and attitudes inconsistent between teams and objective data.BackgroundSBAR is a communication tool developed to accurately refer information with improved outcomes within the NHS. Within psychiatry there is evidence of relatively poor care of medical problems leading to adverse outcomes in a group more susceptible to multiple physical illnesses. The reasons for this include a cultural ethos of learned helplessness in staff and lack of medical knowledge.The use of SBAR is likely to overcome these issues.MethodSurveys were presented to doctors and nurses staff at two Psychiatric Hospitals, Chase Farm and Edgeware. Inclusion in the survey was voluntary and anonymous. Questions elucidated topics ranging from awareness of SBAR through to its use and benefits.Objective data were also collected, looking at handover gathered during the survey period. This was collected via phone from the duty physician over a five-day period, twice-daily. Qualitative data on handover content was collected at CFH.Audit standards around knowledge, use and outcomes were set. Data were collected and analysed in house.ResultThe data (n23) showed that most nurses reported awareness (86.96%) ease of use (86.96%) actual use (60.87%) efficacy in communication (78.26%) value in understanding patients (78.26%) and agreement with mandatory use (78.26%.)Doctor reports (n14) showed that although 100% were aware of SBAR, no respondents thought nurse-led communication was adequate, or that SBAR was used. The majority thought that mandatory SBAR use would improve communication (92.86%) and patient care (100%)Objective data (pooled) of referrals showed that on 6.52% used SBAR. Qualitative data showed that handover was often inaccurate, lacking in information and unsafe. Suggestions for teaching included written or video media, or taught classes.All audit standards were failed.ConclusionSBAR is an effective tool for improving communication and patient outcomes, and is well perceived by the MDT. However, it is poorly used with psychiatry leading to adverse outcomes. Reported use is undermined by objective data. Its mandatory use is well supported and new teaching initiatives are thus being designed to remedy this and improve client experience.
Perception of junior doctors about local induction in Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust - A quality improvement project
Authors: Jehanzeb Saima , Nader Kozara , Scally Ruth 
Published: June 2021

AimsA quality improvement project was undertaken to understand the perception of trainees about the quality of the local induction delivered by Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (BSMHFT). The primary aim was to evaluate the current local induction programme, following concerns raised by previous trainees in National Training Survey (General Medical Council) and local inspection. Our secondary aim was to devise a revised induction programme based on the trainees’ identified needs.MethodTwo anonymised questionnaire surveys were emailed to all Foundation Year Trainees, Core Psychiatry Trainees and General Practice Speciality Trainees working in BSMHFT, in December 2019 and March 2020, using trust survey monkey.ResultThe overall response to survey was 60 percent. 44.44 percent of the responses came from Core Psychiatry Trainees, with 27.78 percent responses each from Foundation Year Trainees and GP Speciality Trainees. Local induction was defined as induction specific to place of work (47.06%), trust based induction (41.18%) or all of the above options (11.76%) by trainees. 83.33% of all trainees had received local induction, whereas 16.67% did not have any local induction at the start of their post. 11.12% trainees were very satisfied and 44.44% were satisfied with local induction. 72.22 percent of the trainees were informed about of the local induction, prior to starting the post.33.3% trainees had a paper version, 22.22% had an electronic version of local induction pack, whereas 44.44% had no induction pack. 55.55% of those trainees who had an induction pack, 43.75% found it very helpful and 56.25% did not find it helpful.88.89% thought having a local induction would be helpful, whereas 11.11 percent did not feel it would help. 94.44% of the trainees completed a local orientation checklist with their consultants. Some of the trainees experienced difficulty in gaining access to electronic prescribing, electronic patient record system (RIO), and identity badges (ID) at the beginning of their post.Conclusion11.12% trainees were very satisfied, 44.44% were satisfied, 22.22 % were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied and 22 % were dissatisfied, with local induction. 88.89% of the trainees thought having a local induction pack would be helpful. Based on the trainees identified needs we developed a template for local induction pack for each post. Clinical supervisors have agreed to take the lead in preparing the local induction pack specific to their post with trainees.We aim to repeat the survey after implementing the changes identified by trainees based on their training needs.
Child parent psychotherapy in the treatment of severe trauma in a 4-year-old child with co-occurring autism spectrum disorder
Authors: Lamb Clare , O'Sullivan Barry 
Published: June 2021

AimsThis poster describes Child Parent Psychotherapy (CPP) in the treatment of severe trauma in a 4-year-old child with co-occurring Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).BackgroundThe London Infant and Family Team (LIFT) implements the New Orleans Intervention Model. It targets the mental health needs of under 5 year olds, providing evidence based assessments and interventions for infants, their parents and foster carers within the framework of the Family Court in England. The majority of children seen by LIFT have suffered severe trauma. LIFT delivers a range of interventions including CPP - a relational treatment for young children who have experienced trauma.CPP seeks to intervene in a number of ways: provides developmental guidance, demonstrates that the child's behaviour has meaning and can be linked to past traumas, enables the child to have space to play and talk about what has happened, helps to name and contain emotions - supporting emotional regulation, and helps the dyad to understand each other. The dyadic relationship is key to the intervention - helping to establish safety for the child and strengthen the caregiver-child relationship, enabling the child to make sense of past experiences and learn new ways to express feelings. Exploration of trauma takes place through a combination of play and interpretations made by the clinician, who supports and holds in mind the experiences and history of both child and carer. There is evidence that CPP helps young traumatised children to become less anxious, more secure in their attachment relationships and more able to cue their needs. There is less evidence of the efficacy of CPP in the context of young children with a co-occurring diagnosis of ASD.MethodThe poster describes the assessment of a 4-year-old child of normal intelligence with a two year history of severe neglect, and physical and emotional abuse, who presented significant behavioural and emotional disturbance. Tools used to assess the child's behaviour, trauma symptoms and ASD are outlined. The process of CPP with the child and foster carer dyad is described. Outcome measures and symptom resolution are reported.ConclusionCo-occurrence of ASD did not prevent this child accessing trauma therapy. He engaged in symbolic play, made use of CPP interpretations, and achieved significant improvement in his symptoms. The differential diagnoses of trauma symptoms and ASD presenting in young children are discussed, alongside the importance of understanding and treating trauma in this context.
Improving the quality of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison Team
Authors: Lewis Gabriella , Chaplin Lucia , Knott Gareth , Coull Alexandra , Sobamowo Lamide 
Published: June 2021

AimsTo increase the percentage of GP referrals to the Croydon Assessment & Liaison (A&L) Team deemed to be of ‘good quality’. The A&L Team receives a large number of referrals daily from GPs, and it was identified that many of these referrals did not include important and relevant information, leading to delays in patient assessments.MethodA questionnaire was distributed to A&L MDT members to collect information about what information they consider important in a GP referral. The project team reviewed the results of the questionnaire, along with current policies and guidelines, to create a set of criteria by which to assess the quality of GP referrals, as there was no pre-existing gold standard available. A random sample of 6 GP referrals per week stratified by locality was collected and assessed against these criteria.Using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology change ideas were generated, and a GP referral form was identified as an important intervention to adopt. A previously-developed draft form was updated after a round of consultations with various stakeholders including Assessment & Liaison staff, GPs and the CCG. The new GP referral form was uploaded to the GP DSX electronic referrals platform and GP practices were also emailed directly to encourage them to use the new form.The proportion of GP referrals deemed to be of good quality was compared pre and post-intervention. Uptake of the new GP referral form was recorded as a process measure, and the length of time taken to discuss referrals at A&L daily referrals meetings as a counterbalance measure.ResultAt baseline 33% of GP referrals were deemed to be of good quality using the developed criteria. This improved to 58% after implementation of the new referral form in January 2021. There was poor overall uptake of the form, with only 32.5% of GP referrals utilising the new form so far, however of the referrals received on the new form 69% fulfilled the criteria for good quality. Comparison of length of discussion required for referrals with and without the new form showed no significant difference (7.7 and 7.6 minutes respectively).ConclusionImplementation of a standardised GP referral form was effective at increasing the proportion of referrals deemed to be of good quality. However, further PDSA cycles focused on improving uptake of the form will be required.
Exploring the views of young people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) on how to improve medical consultations
Authors: Mayor Alexander 
Published: June 2021

AimsThe aim of this study was to explore experiences of consultations with non-specialist health professionals in a group of young people with ASD and their parents and what they considered would help to improve these interactions.BackgroundResearch has shown that general awareness around autism is poor among the general medical community and this can result in poor communication during medical consultations.MethodAn opportunistic group of 4 young people with ASD and 8 parents from a local support group in Exeter were interviewed in an informal environment about their experiences of healthcare consultations after seeking verbal consent.ResultAmong the 8 parents interviewed the themes emerging were a deep lack of understanding and awareness among medical staff of the challenges faced by individuals with autism, the importance of the doctor-patient relationship to allow children to open up to healthcare professionals, and the need for all children to be respected as individuals.Among the 4 young people (13 to 19 years) with ASD interviewed they identified significant anxiety around waiting for appointments and expressed a desire for a distractor to relieve stress, questions posed by clinicians were often vague and should be clearer, 3D models/mannequins could be useful to support understanding of anatomy and physiology, patience and a calm demeanour were vital with a quiet clinical environment to avoid distraction, time for mental preparation is important and efforts should be made to avoid delays or cancellation of appointments where possible.An interactive website was generated in the light of feedback from the client group and their parents, aiming to educate clinicians regarding the challenges faced by this client group and provide a guide suggesting how to facilitate effective consultation through the use of simple techniques to promote engagement/reduce anxiety in the clinical environment.ConclusionSimple changes to the approach to consultation with clients with ASD - a quiet consultation space, no delays and better communication - could reduce stress and promote positive interactions with a beneficial effect on healthcare delivery for this client group.
Dublin's homeless crisis – is this reflected in emergency department psychiatry referrals?
Authors: McLoughlin Aoibheann , Feeney Anna , Cooney John 
Published: June 2021

AimsThis study seeks to explore the prevalence and impact of homelessness in an adult sample of psychiatry referrals over a one-month period via the Emergency Department at St. James's Hospital.BackgroundHomelessness has now reached a crisis point in Ireland. In July 2019, there were 10,275 people documented as homeless nationwide, with the number of homeless families increasing by 178% since June 2015. The majority of individuals registered as homeless are located in Dublin. St. James's Hospital (SJH) provides psychiatric care to a population of 136,704 people across Dublin South-City within areas of significant deprivation according to the most recent social deprivation index.MethodAll Emergency Department psychiatry referrals over a one-month period were recorded. Month of study was randomly generated. Data were collected from electronic records. Socio-demographic information was analysed. Data were anonymised and recorded using Microsoft Excel. Current homelessness statistics were accessed from the Department of Housing, Planning, and Local Government and compared to the data collected.ResultDuring the month of the Study (March 2019), 4315 adults accessed emergency homeless accommodation in Dublin. Of the 109 psychiatry referrals received through the Emergency Department at SJH during this time, over a quarter (28%) of those referred reported themselves to be homeless or living in temporary accommodation. An additional 5% were documented as living in residential or sheltered care at time of assessment. All of the referred homeless patients were unemployed (n = 30). 50% of homeless patients were referred to psychiatry following expressed thoughts or acts of self-harm. Illicit drug abuse was associated with 73% of referrals. Alcohol abuse was associated with 47%. Of those who were referred, under a quarter (23%) were assessed as having a major mental illness, and in the majority of these cases, illicit drug and alcohol abuse were compounding factors in exacerbating symptomatology. Of those referred, 66% had previously been reviewed by psychiatry during prior ED presentations and 60% of homeless presenters reported that they had previously been, or were currently linked in with community mental health teams.ConclusionFrequently, vulnerable patients most in need of social and psychiatric care, such as homeless people with addiction issues, are eclipsed from accessing supports. The high proportion of patients reporting to be homeless is cause for concern and suggests the need for tailored and integrated multi-disciplinary assessments and interventions at an Emergency Department level.
Quality improvement by introduction of 72-hour admission pathway in Forest House Adolescent Unit (FHAU) for young people in crisis
Authors: Mufti Sadaf , Zirinsky Linda 
Published: June 2021

AimsShort admissions for crisis management among young people suffering with Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder (EUPD) as recommended in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2009 guidelines are not routinely offered in the United Kingdom (UK). Our aim was to introduce crisis admissions lasting for 72 hours. During this brief admission the families of young people presenting with suicidal behaviour are offered an assessment and diagnosis of young person's difficulties, psychoeducation, and safety plan for future risky behaviour, in addition to respite.BackgroundThree-day Crisis admission was set up with the aim of reducing inappropriate long admissions in people who may have more negative effects from admission than positive ones. A need was felt for a brief admission pathway in order to be able to provide treatment for patients suffering from EUPD traits in keeping with NICE guidelines. NICE guidelines suggest that people with borderline personality disorder should be considered for acute psychiatric inpatient admission only for the management of crises involving significant risk to self or others that cannot be managed by other services. The guidelines also recommend ensuring that the decision is based on an explicit and joint understanding of the potential benefits and likely harm that may result from admission and agreeing to the length and purpose of the admission in advance.MethodA retrospective study comparing length of hospital stay in the 2018 (when this model was introduced) with previous years, the number of serious incidents was carried out to assess the impact of this new admission model. The rate of readmissions in the same year was also assessed. For qualitative feedback regarding the effectiveness of the crisis admission as an intervention, a survey was carried out to assess parent satisfaction and the nursing staff was asked for their views.ResultThere was a marked reduction in the number of serious incidents linked to suicide and length of hospital stay was reduced to half in the year when the crisis admissions were introduced as compared to the previous year. Only about 10-15% of patients required re-admission in the same year. About 90% of parents gave a positive feedback confirming the effectiveness of this intervention.Conclusion72-hour crisis admissions for adolescents are effective, appropriate, clinically indicated alternative to routine admissions with a high parent satisfaction.
An audit into the monitoring of off-label antipsychotics in primary care
Authors: Rafi Damir , Ferreiro-Pisos Javier , Hargrave John Millwood , Pérez Cristina Losada 
Published: June 2021

AimsTo ascertain whether patients prescribed second generation antipsychotics for off-label indications are being monitored and screened adequately for physical health side-effects.BackgroundThe prevalence of off-label antipsychotic use has increased significantly over recent decades. Common off-licence uses include dementia, post-traumatic stress disorder, adjunctive treatment for unipolar depression and personality disorders. Recent studies have demonstrated that up to 65% of antipsychotic prescriptions are now off-label. Since the metabolic side-effects of second-generation antipsychotics are well-established, guidelines have emphasised the need for active, routine physical health screening of all individuals taking these drugs. However, there have been few studies or reviews which have specifically investigated screening rates of individuals receiving antipsychotic medications for off-licence indications.MethodAn audit of patients taking second-generation antipsychotics for off-label indications, under the caseload of Neighbourhoods 1, 3 and 4 of Lewisham Assessment & Liaison team, was conducted. After isolating individual patients fulfilling inclusion criteria, patient investigation documents were requested from relevant GP practices. 40 patients were isolated in total, and data were successfully collected in 60% (n = 24). Data were collected via a proforma. This consisted of patient information, indications for antipsychotic use, and each variable to be monitored. The audit standard used was the recommendations of the 12th Maudsley guidelines. Data were then entered into SPSS and analysed.ResultThe most common reasons for off-label antipsychotic prescribing were Emotionally Unstable Personality disorder (42%, n = 10) and depression (29%, n = 7). Findings demonstrated that 54% (n = 13) of patients audited had ‘basic’ blood screening (FBC, U&E, LFTs), however glucose (38%, n = 9), Prolactin (13%, n = 3), and Creatine Kinase (0%, n = 0), and monitoring was less frequent. 0% (n = 0) were completely monitored as per audit standard.ConclusionPrimary care monitoring of off-label antipsychotics is unsatisfactory, with no patients having a complete set of investigations. Reasons for this are unclear at this stage, however based on initial discussion with GP surgeries, may be due to lack of education regarding screening investigations, patients lost between primary and secondary care services, and a lack of clarity regarding responsibility and designated roles. This audit will be expanded to also include patients from Neighbourhood 2 of the Lewisham Assessment & Liaison team. A more detailed investigation will be conducted into the barriers to physical health screening, such that a targeted intervention can be implanted.