bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Impact of systemic inflammation and sarcopenia on prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Authors: da Silva Dias David , Machado Mafalda , Gosalbez Beatriz , Ravasco Paula 
Published: January 2021

38 Background: Systemic inflammation, evaluated with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and sarcopenia, assessed with skeletal muscle index (SMI), appear to predict mortality in many cancers, although the optimal cut-offs are still a matter of debate. The goal of this study is to evaluate the cut-offs of NLR and SMI and their prognostic value on metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) under first line treatment. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of patients with mCRC under first-line treatment in two hospital units, between January 2015 and December 2018. Muscle mass area (MMA) was detected on computed tomography, on L3 segment, with ImageJ software. SMI was determined as MMA/height2. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS v25 software. Results: 178 patients were analysed, with mean age of 62 (±11) years old. 65% were male and 62.9% had ECOG PS 0. Two thirds of patients presented metastasis in a single organ, mainly in liver. The cut-off values were established based on ROC analysis. Systemic inflammation was defined as NLR > 2.80 and sarcopenia was defined by SMI < 49.12 cm2/m2 for men and <35.85 cm2/m2 for women. 52% of patients presented sarcopenia. In a multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model, an association was observed between overall survival and ECOG PS (p=0.014; HR 5.46, CI 95% [1.42-21.10]), systemic inflammation (p=0,038; HR 2.20, CI 95% [1,05-4.62]) and sarcopenia (p=0.01; HR 4.73, CI 95% [1.85-12.09]). Conclusions: In this study, sarcopenia and systemic inflammation showed independent prognostic value on patients with mCRC. Future prospective studies are necessary to establish a definitive cut-off value for application in clinical practice.
Real-world one-year overall survival among patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) treated with liposomal irinotecan in the NAPOLI-1 based regimen.
Authors: Kim George P. , Cockrum Paul , Surinach Andy , Abushahin Laith I. 
Published: January 2021

392 Background: Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal cancers in the United States (US) with a 5-year relative survival of 9%. Among patients who received liposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin in the NAPOLI-1 study, a randomized phase 3 study in patients with mPDAC previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy, 25% (n = 29) were alive at ≥ 1 year. This study examines the real world one-year survival of patients with mPDAC treated with liposomal irinotecan as a doublet with 5-FU in the NAPOLI-1 based regimen. Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized the Flatiron Health EHR database from over 280 cancer clinics in the US. Data were analyzed for adult patients with mPDAC treated with liposomal irinotecan-based regimens between November 2015 and July 2020. Patient characteristics and one-year overall survival (OS) based on Kaplan-Meier estimates were assessed. Cycles were defined as unique days with an administration of liposomal irinotecan. Results: There were 669 patients (median age: 69y, IQR: 62-75) included in the study. ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-1 and 2+ were reported for 78.3% (n = 396) and 21.7% (n = 110) of patients, respectively. ECOG PS was not captured for 24.4% (n = 163) of patients. 16.3% (n = 109) of patients initiated liposomal irinotecan-based in the first line (1L) metastatic setting, 47.5% (n = 318) in second line (2L), and 36.2% (n = 242) in the third line or later (3L+). The median number of cycles received was 4 (IQR: 2 – 8). Among all patients, one-year OS was 17.2% (95% CI: 14.3% - 20.7%). One-year OS was 31.5% (22.1% – 41.3%) for patients treated in 1L, 16.4% (12.2% - 21.1%) for patients treated in 2L, and 12.2% (7.5% - 18.0%) for patients treated in 3L. The median number of cycles for 1L, 2L, and 3L were 5, 4, and 3, respectively. One-year OS increased as patients were able to receive more cycles of liposomal irinotecan. Patients who received at least 2 cycles of liposomal irinotecan (n = 551) had a one-year OS of 20.4% (16.8% - 24.2%). Among patients who received at least 4 cycles (n = 359) and at least 8 cycles (n = 170), the one-year OS estimates were 29.1% (24.0% - 34.3%) and 47.9% (39.7% - 55.7%), respectively. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of patients with mPDAC treated with liposomal irinotecan, as expected, one-year OS increased as patients remained on therapy. Patients in this cohort were older, had more prior lines of therapy, worse ECOG PS, and similar exposure to treatment compared with patients in the registrational phase 3 NAPOLI-1 study. Among patients who received at least 4 cycles of liposomal irinotecan, one-year OS (29%) was similar to both the intent-to-treat (25%) and per protocol treated patient populations in the NAPOLI-1 trial (34%). Further studies are needed to understand the predictors of long-term survival among patients with mPDAC.
Circulating tumor DNA methylation as markers for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Authors: Liu Xiaoding , Guo Shiwei , Ma Chengcheng , Li Yatong , Liu Xiaoqian , Zhang Zhiwen , Yu Lianyuan , Dai Menghua , Shen Shuo , Wu Huanwen M. , Su Zhixi , He Qiye , Liu Rui , Gang Jin , Liang Zhiyong 
Published: January 2021

395 Background: PDAC is a cancer of high mortality and low survival. Its early detection is critical due to symptoms often occur only at advanced stages. However there is no reliable screening tool to identify high-risk patients. ctDNA methylation has recently emerged as a promising new target to differentiate PDAC plasma from normal plasma for its early detection. Methods: Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing libraries were made in 46 PDAC tissues, 30 para-PDAC tissues and 20 PDAC plasmas to screen PDAC-specific markers, which was done by quantifying and comparing methylation levels of genomic regions and individual CpG sites between those groups. Markers were validated in plasma samples from 84 PDAC patients and 64 normal controls to propose a blood classifier. The best-performing markers were developed into a targeted sequencing panel, which was tested on a larger collection of plasma samples from patients of a variety of pancreatic diseases to build and validate a PDAC-predicting model. Results: We profiled genome-wide methylation patterns of tissues samples to identify 171 PDAC-specific markers. We reiterated training and cross-validating PDAC classification models using SVM method, and achieved an average sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 88%. To prove the feasibility of a non-invasive detection in plasma, a targeted methylation assay using those markers was tested on PDAC and normal plasmas, and yielded an average sensitivity of 68.4% and a specificity of 85.8%. We refined the panel by selecting the most discriminatory markers and built the version II of the panel, which was named PANcreatic Cancer Detection Assay, or PANDA, for a more efficient target capture, which was validated in an independent cohort of plasma samples that included 94 PDAC cases, 25 chronic pancreatitis (CP) cases and 80 normal samples from multiple centers. The PANDA achieved an AUC of 0.906 when classifying PDAC from normal, and an AUC of 0.882 when separating PDAC from CPs, both of which are more accurate than CA19-9, the conventional blood marker for PDAC. We further integrated test subjects’ age and their CA19-9 level as features into the PANDA model, which further elevated their AUC to 0.882 and 0.933 when classifying PDAC plasma from either CP plasma or normal plasma, respectively. Conclusions: We have developed PANDA, an NGS based target assay covering PDAC-specific DNA methylation targets by screening and validation on PDAC tissues and plasmas. Combined with age and CA19-9 blood level, PANDA has shown encouraging results to classify PDAC plasma from non-malignant diseases, demonstrating its potential to be optimized into non-invasive diagnostics for blood-based early PDAC screening.
NACRE: A randomized study comparing short course radiotherapy with radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers in the elderly—Preliminary results.
Authors: FRANCOIS Eric , Pernot Mandy , Ronchin Philippe , Nouhaud Elodie , Martel Lafay Isabelle , Pascal Artru , Clavere Pierre , Vendrely Veronique , Boige Valerie , Thamphya Brice , Nénan-Le Ficher Soazig , Magné Nicolas 
Published: January 2021

4 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy followed by total mesorectal surgery is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal carcinoma (RC). In the elderly, often underrepresented in clinical trials, but who represent a very large number of patients, therapeutic proposals are not based on high levels of evidence. The NACRE study investigated the role of short course radiotherapy with delayed surgery in this population. Methods: The PRODIGE 42-GERICO 12 NACRE is a multicenter randomized clinical trial aimed at comparing Arm A preop radiochemotherapy (RCT) (50 Gy, 2Gy/fraction [fr]; 25 fr + capecitabine) and delayed surgery and Arm B short course radiotherapy (25 gy, 5Gy/fr, 5fr) and delayed surgery. Eligible patients (pts) had cT3 or cT4 (or cT2 of the very low rectum), M0 rectal adenocarcinomas <12 cm from the anal verge, age ≥75years, and WHO PS ≤2. Randomization was stratified by center, T (T2/T3-T4) stage and Age (≤80 or >80 years). Two primary end-points will be analyzed according to the hierarchical sequential procedure: firstly R0 resection rate (non-inferiority test with a 8% non-inferiority margin), secondly preservation of autonomy using IADL score (superiority test with 15% absolute difference margin); secondary end-point will be survival and toxicity. We present here the results for R0 resection, survival and toxicities. Results: 29 sites randomized 101 patients from 01/2016 to 08/2019, 59 were males (58.4%), median age was 80 years (range 75-91). Pts characteristics were well balanced. 14% of pts in arm A did not receive all of the planned neoadjuvant treatment compared to 0% in arm B. The R0 resection rate in arm B (86.0% [IC95% 73-94%]) was not-inferior to the R0 resection rate in arm A (89.8% [ic95% 77-97%]), p=0.04 (non inferiority test). With a median follow-up of 15.8 months (CI95%: 14.8-26.0), the 6 months death rate was 10.0% (CI95%: 3.0-22.0) in arm A and 3.92% (CI95%: 0 -13.0) in arm B. There is a significant difference in overall survival between the two arm in favor of arm B (p=0.04, LogRank test), and there is a trend in favor of arm B for specific survival (p=0.06 LogRank test). Disease free survival is not statistically different (p=0.9). 13 serious adverse events were observed in arm A during preoperative phase, 7 in arm B, 16 and 10 respectively during the post-operative phase. Conclusions: These preliminary results show that short course radiotherapy with delayed surgery is associated with better compliance than radiochemotherapy in elderly patients and could give an advantage in overall survival. This regimen may be preferred in elderly patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02551237.
Irreversible electroporation versus chemotherapy with or without radiation for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors: Sugumar Kavin , Hue Jonathan J. , Rothermel Luke , Hardacre Jeffrey , Ammori John Brian , Winter Jordan Michael , Ocuin Lee M 
Published: January 2021

408 Background: Multi-agent chemotherapy (CT) with or without radiotherapy (RT) is the standard of care for non-metastatic Type B locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Irreversible electroporation (IRE) has been described as a treatment modality in patients with LAPC but published postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are high for a non-curative procedure. There have been few studies that have compared directly IRE with standard of care CT ± RT. We performed a meta-analysis of the available literature to compare the outcomes between these treatment groups in LAPC. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library in September 2020. Studies that focused on comparing outcomes between IRE and CT ± RT for LAPC were selected for further study. The impact of IRE versus CT ± RT was evaluated using forest plot analysis. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) served as the primary endpoints. As a secondary objective, short term morbidity and mortality data in both groups was evaluated. Results: Our search yielded 326 papers. After excluding duplicates, 3 studies met inclusion criteria. All were retrospective. Combined, these studies included clinical data on 3,862 patients. The meta-analysis indicated that patients with LAPC who underwent IRE had better OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28-0.74) and PFS (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.24-0.60) compared to patients who received CT ± RT. Due to incomplete morbidity, 30-, and 90- day mortality information reported in the included studies, further analysis was not performed for the same. Conclusions: There is a striking paucity of studies comparing IRE with the standard of care treatment approaches for LAPC. Our meta-analysis reveals that IRE has been associated with longer OS and PFS compared to CT ± RT. However, these studies are limited by retrospective study design, heterogeneity of population and chemotherapy regimens, and incomplete morbidity data, precluding any conclusions. Until higher quality, comparative retrospective studies, or more importantly, prospective studies with standardized indications are conducted, IRE should be used with caution and remains experimental in the treatment of PDAC.
Investigate the efficacy of immunotherapy for treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).
Authors: Noor Arish , Aguirre Luis E. , Blue Kirsten , Avriett Trenton , Carballido Estrella M. , Kim Richard D. , Kim Dae Won 
Published: January 2021

415 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved in solid tumors with dMMR. However, only limited data are available for PDAC with dMMR given the rarity of dMMR in PDAC. We evaluated efficacy of ICIs in PDAC with dMMR. Methods: Retrospective clinical and pathologic data were collected for patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from May 2017 to June 2020 at Moffitt cancer center. Results: We identified 10 pts with dMMR PDAC. The median age was 64.5 years (range: 42-86) and 4 pts were male. 4 pts had resectable disease, 3 had locally advanced and 3 had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. MSH6 deficiency (def) was found in 2 cases, PMS2 def in 2, MLH/PMS2 def in 5, and MSH2/MSH6 in 1. 7 pts were treated with ICIs. 3 pts had locally advanced and 4 had metastatic disease when they started ICIs. 5 received Pembrolizumab (pem), 1 received ipilimumab/ nivolumab (ipi/nivo), and 1 received pem then ipi/nivo after progressive disease (PD) on pem. The median number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 0-2). 6 pts were evaluable, and 1 had rapid disease progression after 1 dose of pem. Among 6 evaluable pts, 3 had an objective response (1: complete response and 2: partial response), and 2 had stable disease (SD). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 mo, and median overall survival was not reached with median follow-up (FU) of 6.8 mo. The median duration of response was not reached with a median FU of 22.6 mo. The pt with CR remained disease-free for up to 22 months. The pt whose treatment was switched to ipi/nivo after PD on pem achieved SD > 4mo on ipi/nivo. While on immunotherapy, one patient with ipi/nivo developed immunotherapy associated rash requiring systemic steroids, and another on pem developed hypothyroidism requiring levothyroxine. Conclusions: This series suggest ICIs can provide durable clinical efficacy in pts with dMMR PDAC.
The impact of multi-agent chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A population-based study utilizing the SEER database.
Authors: Sugumar Kavin , Gupta Shreya , Hue Jonathan J. , Ocuin Lee Mayer , Rothermel Luke , Hardacre Jeffrey , Ammori John Brian , Winter Jordan Michael 
Published: January 2021

416 Background: Over the last decade, various landmark trials have demonstrated the impact of multi-agent chemotherapy in the treatment of PDAC. However, the impact in the ‘real world’ has been less clear. The ACCORD trial (2011) was a phase III trial comparing combination chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX) and single agent (gemcitabine) for advanced disease. The MPACT trial introduced another beneficial regimen (nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine) in 2013. Subsequently, multi-agent chemotherapy became standard of care for medically appropriate patients. Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify patients diagnosed with PDAC between 1998 and 2017. The cohort was divided into two groups: 1998-2011 (pre-ACCORD) and 2012-2017 (post-ACCORD). We analyzed all patients with metastatic PDAC for overall survival and compared results in the two groups using Kaplan Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. An interrupted time series analysis was also used to compare the temporal trends in 2-year survival between 1998 and 2017. Results: A total of 47,134 patients were diagnosed with PDAC between 1998 and 2017. Nearly two-third of patients (26,438; 57%) had distant disease. On univariate survival analysis, there was a significant increased overall survival probability in the 2012-17 group compared to the 1998-2011 group (p<0.05). The one- and two-year survival rates were 11% and 3% in the pre-ACCORD period compared to 14% and 4 % after the ACCORD trial respectively. This difference remained significant on multivariate analysis while adjusting for covariates (HR=0.08, 0.78-0.92, p=0.05). On interrupted time series analysis, we observed a steady rise in 2- year survival between 1998 and 2017. There was a significant jump in the two-year survival probability from 16% at 2011 to 20% at 2012 in metastatic PDAC (β=0.02, 0.009-0.03, p<0.0001, Table). Conclusions: Beyond the randomized clinical trial arena, overall survival has increased over time, with a statistically significant jump around the time of the ACCORD trial. However, the absolute increase in the ‘real world’ is smaller than the gains observed in prospective clinical trials. [Table: see text]
Characteristics and growth rate of lung metastases in patients with primary gastrointestinal malignancies: A retrospective cohort analysis.
Authors: Burns Shohei , Vella Maya , Paciorek Alan , Zhang Li , Atreya Chloe Evelyn , Collisson Eric Andrew , Feng Mary Uan-Sian , Kelley Robin Kate , Tempero Margaret A. , Van Loon Katherine , Ko Andrew H. 
Published: January 2021

442 Background: There are no formal guidelines for the management of GI cancer pts with lung-exclusive or lung-predominant metastases (LM), which generally take a more indolent course than metastatic disease occurring at other anatomic sites. We performed a retrospective analysis at a high-volume tertiary care center to evaluate host and tumor characteristics of this pt population, describe treatment approaches, and model patterns and rates of growth. Methods: Eligible pts were identified through Cancer Center registry data, provider recall, and electronic record review. Criteria included LM occurring either synchronously (SLM) or metachronously (MLM) w/primary cancer diagnosis; nodal, but not visceral or peritoneal, mets allowed. Data re: demographics, tumor characteristics, and rx modalities were collected. We reviewed all eligible CT +/- PET scan reports to gather data on #, location, and size of pulm mets, with all images subsequently reviewed by an independent radiologist. Up to 5 pulm mets were tracked through each pt’s clinical course. Growth rate was estimated using a linear mixed model analysis considering patients as the random. Results: Forty pts were identified between 9/2009 - 12/2019 (23 F/17 M; 28 white/7 Asian/5 other/multi; median age 62 y.o.; n = 15 w/tobacco hx). Tumor types: pancreatic (n = 18), colorectal (n = 12), hepatobiliary (n = 7), other (n = 3). SLM vs MLM:13/27; intact vs resected primary = 16/24. Median time from orig cancer dx to onset of MLM = 16 mos (range, 1 to 60 mos). No. of pulm mets at 1st appearance: 1 (n = 7); 2-5 (n = 17); 6-10 (n = 16). Median size of largest pulm met at 1st appearance = 6 mm (range, 0-39 mm); avg growth rate of largest pulm met = 0.18 mm/month (95% CI, 0.08-0.27). Avg growth rate of up to 5 largest lesions (sum) = 0.35 mm/month (95% CI, 0.07-0.64). Median f/u time prior to rx initiation for MLM = 172 days (range, 25-1547 days); 18 pts developed additional mets during their observation period. Rx modalities for LM: surg (n = 6), radiation (n = 18), systemic rx (n = 32). Addn details specific to cancer type, progression patterns, and pt outcomes will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The natural hx of LM varies across the spectrum of GI malignancies. Further larger-scale efforts to define patterns of growth of LM for different GI cancers, informed by size, #, and clinical/molecular features, are needed to guide appropriate timing and selection of rx as well as surveillance strategies.
Final results of the ACTS-CC 02 trial: A randomized phase III trial of S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) versus UFT/leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage III colon cancer.
Authors: Tomita Naohiro , Sasaki Shin , Kusumoto Tetsuya , Watanabe Jun , Sakamoto Yoshiyuki , Yoshida Kazuhiro , Maeda Atsuyuki , Teshima Jin , Yokota Mitsuru , Tanaka Chihiro , Yamauchi Junichiro , Uetake Hiroyuki , Itabashi Michio , Takahashi Keiichi , Baba Hideo , Kotake Kenjiro , Boku Narikazu , Aiba Keisuke , Morita Satoshi , Sugihara Kenichi ,   ACTS-CC 02 Study Group
Published: January 2021

59 Background: As previously reported (Sunami E, et al. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020), the ACTS-CC 02 trial demonstrated that S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) was not superior to UFT/leucovorin (LV) in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage III colon cancer (any T, N2, or positive nodes around the origin of the feeding arteries). We now report the final overall survival (OS) after a median follow-up of more than 6 years. Methods: A total of 966 patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive either UFT/LV (300–600 mg/day of UFT according to body surface area [BSA] and 75 mg/day of LV on days 1-28, every 35 days, 5 courses) or SOX (100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 and 80–120 mg/day of S-1 according to BSA on days 1-14, every 21 days, 8 courses). The primary endpoint was DFS. Patients’ data were updated in February 2020. Results: The subjects of this final efficacy analysis were 955 patients (478 in the UFT/LV group and 477 in the SOX group). Totally, Stage IIIA/IIIB/IIIC were 1.3%/50.2%/48.6% and T1/2/3/4 were 1.5%/4.0%/61.8%/32.7%. With median follow-up time of 74.3 months, the 5-year OS rate was 78.3% in the UFT/LV group and 79.1% in the SOX group (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76-1.24; p = 0.8175). The 5-year DFS rate was 55.2% in the UFT/LV group and 58.1% in the SOX group (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76-1.11; p = 0.3973). In an exploratory analysis, the 5-year OS rate in patients with T4 disease was 65.2% and 70.8% in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, respectively (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.56-1.17), and the 5-year DFS rate was 45.4% and 50.5% (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.65-1.19), respectively. Notably, in patients with T4N2b disease, the 5-year OS rate was 51.0% and 64.1% in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.40-1.31) and the 5-year DFS rate was 31.1% and 37.2% (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.50-1.31), respectively. Conclusions: In Japanese patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer, the 5-year OS rate was similar in the UFT/LV group and SOX group. However, the oxaliplatin-based regimen was suggested to be more effective for DFS and OS in patients with advanced disease, such as T4N2b. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-101073.