Tele‐practice for children and young people with communication disabilities: Employing the COM‐B model to review the intervention literature and inform guidance for practitioners
Authors: Law James , Dornstauder Melanie , Charlton Jenna , Gréaux Mélanie 
Published: February 2021

AbstractBackgroundMany healthcare and educational services providers have undergone a rapid transition from a face‐to‐face to a tele‐practice mode of service delivery in the context of the COVID‐19 outbreak. This, in turn, has led to a need to understand better the evidence underpinning such moves. Based on a review of existing reviews, this paper critically analyses the relevant literature related to intervention with children with communication disabilities drawing on the COM‐B model.Methods & ProceduresTen reviews were identified following a systematic searching of electronic databases. These were then coded according to both PRISMA criteria and the components of the COM‐B model. Based on these findings, a critical analysis of the state of the tele‐practice intervention literature is discussed and fed into evidence‐based advice for practitioners transitioning to this mode of service delivery.Outcomes & ResultsThe COM‐B mapping suggests that the existing literature has provided primary evidence for physical opportunity and reflective motivation (e.g., participants have the time to take part and the necessary materials, as well as a desire to do it). It has also focused on elements of social opportunity (e.g., having support and prompts from others to take part). However, there are significant gaps in the description and analysis of both physical and psychological capability components.Conclusions & ImplicationsWhilst the evidence for tele‐practice interventions for children and young people with communication disabilities is growing, it is also lacking a comprehensive framework to support its implementation. In times of rapid transitions, researchers and practitioners alike need to understand how to evaluate comprehensively the impact of changing the mode of intervention delivery. The COM‐B model provides a powerful tool to reflect on the key elements for the successful design and implementation of tele‐practice interventions.
What this paper addsWhat is already known on this subject
Tele‐practice has been a feature of service delivery for speech and language therapists working with children and young people with speech and language disorders for many years, as it has in other areas of practice. This came into sharp focus during 2020 during the ‘lock‐down’ following the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic when most practice went online.
What this paper adds to existing knowledge
This study set out to provide a framework for understanding service delivery, drawing on the COM‐B behaviour change model. This is applied using a rapid review methodology to 10 systematic and narrative reviews of the existing literature published since 2005. The findings suggest that while most studies demonstrated efficacy, there was a lack of information regarding specific aspects of the model which would affect their implementation.
What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?
It is anticipated that the paper has the potential to have a direct bearing on how tele‐practice services for children and young people with speech and language disorders will be delivered in the future. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations for practice and research in terms of the application of the COM‐B model to tele‐practice in speech and language therapy.