P095 The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on clinical care, self-management, and mental health in patients with inflammatory arthritis
Authors: Sweeney Melissa , Carpenter Lewis , de Souza Savia , Chaplin Hema , Tung Hsiu , Caton Emma , Galloway James , Cope Andrew , Yates Mark , Norton Sam 
Published: April 2021

Abstract
Background/Aims
COVID-19 lockdown affected access to clinical care for many vulnerable patients, including those with inflammatory arthritis (IA). It also had the potential to alter self-management behaviours. These changes could in turn impact mental health, especially given that IA patients are already at higher risk of mental health disorders. Thus, the aims of this study were to determine how IA care and self-management were affected by lockdown and assess the impact of these changes on disease outcomes and mental health.
Methods
Online questionnaires were completed by 338 participants between June and July 2020. The questionnaires assessed demographics, IA condition, IA self-management, COVID-19 clinical information, quality of life, and mental health. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for patient global assessment (PGA) of disease activity, pain, fatigue, and emotional distress were completed relating to the previous week and retrospectively for pre-lockdown (March) and early-lockdown (April). Improvement/worsening in each VAS was considered as a change of 10 points or more from pre-lockdown to the current rating. Linear regressions were conducted to determine factors associated with worse outcomes, controlling for potential confounders including self-reported pre-lockdown status.
Results
Mean VAS scores worsened during lockdown for all outcome measures, with over half reporting a more than 10-point worsening (Table 1). Changes to clinical care affected 87% of patients. The most commonly affected services were hospital outpatient appointments (77%), GP appointments (59%), and blood tests (53%). Changes to clinical care were significantly associated with worse PGA (b = 8.95, p=0.01), pain (b = 7.13, p=0.05), fatigue (b = 17.01, p&lt;0.00) and emotional distress (b = 12.78, p&lt;0.01). Regarding self-management, 64% of patients reported changes to diet while 51% reduced physical activity. Change in diet was not significantly associated with any of the outcomes, whereas physical activity was associated with PGA (b=-2.42, p&lt;0.01), pain (b=-2.43, p&lt;0.01), fatigue (b=-2.5, p &lt; 0.01), and emotional distress (b=-2.41, p&lt;0.01).
Conclusion
Most patients (87%) had at least one area of clinical care affected by the lockdown. These changes in IA clinical care were associated with worse disease outcomes across all measures and greater emotional distress. In self-management, reduced physical activity was associated with worse outcomes in all physical and mental health measures. P095 Table 1:Mean VAS (0-100) scores and percent changesPGAMarch April June/JulyMean (SD) 44.51 (23.70) 53.18 (24.67) 57.69 (25.29)Better Same WorsePercent 7.9936.6855.33[95% CI] [5.33-11.41][31.54-42.07][49.85-60.71]PainMarch April June/July42.60 (25.60) 51.11 (26.01) 56.66 (26.40)Better Same Worse7.6937.8754.44[5.09-11.07] [32.68-43.28][48.96-59.84]FatigueMarch April June/July46.86 (26.17) 57.11 (25.83) 61.35 (26.51)Better Same Worse10.0634.0255.92[7.07-13.77] [28.98-39.35][50.44-61.29]Emotional DistressMarch April June/July30.96 (26.28) 49.06 (29.09) 48.75 (29.15)Better Same Worse8.2833.14 58.58[5.58-11.75] [28.14-38.43][53.12-63.88]
Disclosure
M. Sweeney: None. L. Carpenter: None. S. de Souza: None. H. Chaplin: None. H. Tung: None. E. Caton: None. J. Galloway: None. A. Cope: None. M. Yates: None. S. Norton: None.