bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Durvalumab (D) and PET-directed chemoradiation (CRT) after induction FOLFOX for esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Ku Geoffrey Yuyat , Wu Abraham Jing-Ching , Sihag Smita , Park Bernard J. , Jones David Randolph , Gu Ping , Maron Steven Brad , Sugarman Ryan , Chalasani Sree Bhavani , Shcherba Marina , Feder Lara , Cowie Kendall , Norris Jaclyn , Johnson Valerie , Tang Laura H. , Ilson David H. , Janjigian Yelena Y. , Molena Daniela 
Published: January 2021

226 Background: Based on the positive results of the CALGB 80803 study (J Clin Oncol 2017;35:1 [abstr]), we have added D to induction FOLFOX and pre-op CRT. Methods: Patients (Pts) had TanyN+ or T3-4NanyM0 esophageal and Siewert Type I-III GEJ adenocarcinoma staged by EUS, PET/CT and CT. Pts received mFOLFOX6 ×2 prior to repeat PET/CT. PET responders (PETr) received 5-FU or capecitabine and oxaliplatin with RT to 50.4Gy, while induction PET non-responders (PETnr) received carboplatin/paclitaxel with RT. All Pts received D 1,500 mg q4W ×2 starting 2 wks prior to and during CRT. Esophagectomy was planned 6-8 weeks after CRT. Pts who had R0 resections received adjuvant D 1,500mg q4W ×6. Results: 36 Pts have been enrolled: 25 GEJ, 11 esophageal; 23 N+ and 32 T3/4. 26 of 36 Pts (72%) are PETr. 2 Pts developed metastatic disease after CRT and 9 Pts remain on preop treatment. 25 Pts have had surgery (Table). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was seen in 6 (24%); 5 Pts (20%) had ypT1N0 tumors with 99% response and 2 Pts (8%) had ypT0N1 with 99% response. 20 Pts (80%) had >90% response. 3 Pts had MSI tumors (2 PETr; 1 pCR, 1 T1aN0 99% response, 1 ypT2N0 90% response). Notable grade (gd) 3/4 adverse events (AEs) observed were neutropenia in 8 Pts (22%), diarrhea and vomiting in 2 Pts each (6%). Notable gd 1/2 AEs in ≥20%: anemia (31 Pts), thrombocytopenia (29 Pts), nausea (21 Pts), fatigue (25 Pts), increased AST (20 Pts), constipation and diarrhea (9 Pts), diarrhea (8 Pts). Immune-related AEs noted were gd 2 dermatitis (2 Pts), gd 3 hepatitis and gd 1 hypothyroidism in 1 Pt each. Median length of post-op stay was 8 days, with 12% anastomotic complication rate, including 1 Pt who died of hematemesis 16 days after discharge from 55-day hospitalization. Conclusions: The addition of D to induction FOLFOX and PET-directed CRT is safe and feasible. pCR and near-pCR in ½ of operated Pts is encouraging and compares favorably to the pCR rate of 31% in CALGB 80803 Pts who received induction FOLFOX. The final pCR rate and correlatives for the fully accrued study will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02962063. [Table: see text]
KEYlargo: A phase II study of first-line pembrolizumab (P), capecitabine (C), and oxaliplatin (O) in HER2-negative gastroesophageal (GE) adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Uronis Hope Elizabeth , Rushing Christel , Blobe Gerard C. , Hsu Shiaowen David , Mettu Niharika B. , Wells James Leroy , Niedzwiecki Donna , Hartman Leighanne , Moyer Ashley , Hurwitz Herbert I. , Strickler John H. 
Published: January 2021

228 Background: Gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas are a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Many of these patients (pts) present with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease and are treated with combination cytotoxic chemotherapy. Single agent P is FDA approved for patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ) whose tumors have a combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 after disease progression on or after two lines of therapy including fluoropyrimidine and platinum and her2/neu-targeted therapy (if indicated). More effective therapy is needed earlier in the disease trajectory. We conducted a single-arm phase II trial to establish the safety and efficacy of first-line C and O + P. Methods: Pts with previously untreated metastatic GE adenocarcinoma regardless of PDL-1 status received intravenous (IV) P 200mg with IV O 130mg/m2 every three weeks and oral C 850mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days on/7 days off. After the 6 patient safety cohort, pts first completed a biomarker cycle that included fresh tumor biopsy before P and one week after P before chemotherapy started. Archived FFPE tumor samples were also obtained from all pts with available tissue. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Results: 36 pts were enrolled and 34 pts were evaluable for efficacy (1 pt withdrew for personal reasons before end of cycle 1 and 1 pt had immune-related toxicity during cycle 1 and was taken off study before any efficacy assessment). 9 pts (26%) had an esophageal primary, 18 pts (53%) had a GEJ primary and 7 pts (21%) had a gastric primary. Median PFS was 7.6 months [95% CI: 5.8 to 12.2], RR was 72.7% [95% CI: 57% to 88%], and median OS was 15.8 months [95% CI: 11.6 to NE]. 27 patients (81.8%) had decrease in disease burden (ranging from -19% to -100%). After > 18 months of follow-up, 5 patients remained in durable complete response (CR). Immune-mediated treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) included thyroid disorders (n=5; 14%), colitis (n=4; 11%), adrenal insufficiency (n=2; 5%), and type 1 diabetes (n=1). Sixteen patients (44%) experienced grade 3 or 4 TRAEs. There were no grade 5 TRAEs. Conclusions: The combination of C and O + P had acceptable safety and significant clinical activity. These promising results indicate that C and O + P merits further study as a first line option for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic GE adenocarcinoma. Updated survival and correlative data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03342937.
Genomic characterization of a comprehensive collection of esophagogastric cancer patient-derived xenografts.
Authors: Moy Ryan H. , Mattar Marissa , Molena Daniela , Strong Vivian E. , Jones David Randolph , Coit Daniel G. , Tang Laura , Maron Steven Brad , Hechtman Jaclyn Frances , de Stanchina Elisa , Janjigian Yelena Y. 
Published: January 2021

233 Background: Large-scale sequencing has identified multiple oncogenic drivers and molecularly defined subsets in esophagogastric cancer. However, besides therapies for HER2-positive and microsatellite instability-high disease, few genomic biomarker-driven treatments are currently approved. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have emerged as promising preclinical models that capture the heterogeneity and biology of human tumors. Therefore, we established a comprehensive collection of esophagogastric cancer PDXs and performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) to genomically characterize these models. Methods: Starting in 2010, we developed an ongoing program for generating esophagogastric cancer PDXs from fresh tumor specimens that are acquired from surgical resections or biopsies and implanted into NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice either subcutaneously into flanks or orthotopically into the gastric wall. We reviewed clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients from whom established PDXs were derived, including stage, histology, HER2 status and treatment history. To identify oncogenic DNA alterations, NGS was performed on PDX material using MSK-IMPACT, a capture-based NGS platform. Results: From April 2010 to August 2018, we implanted 270 tumor samples, of which 112 were successfully engrafted (41.4%) including 57 gastric adenocarcinomas, 25 gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas, 23 esophageal adenocarcinomas, 4 squamous cell carcinomas and 3 small cell/high-grade neuroendocrine tumors. PDXs were generated from both primary tumors (n = 67, 59.8%) and metastases (n = 45, 40.2%), with many PDXs established from patients with metastatic disease who had progressed on standard therapy (n = 50, 44.6%). In addition, a large number of PDXs were derived from patients initially diagnosed with HER2-positive esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (n = 68, 60.7%). NGS of these PDXs demonstrated frequent alterations in TP53, receptor tyrosine kinases ( ERBB2, EGFR), cell-cycle mediators ( CDK12, CCNE1, CCND3) and histone methyltransferases ( KMT2C, KMT2D), consistent with clinical sequencing. Conclusions: Comprehensive molecular profiling demonstrates that esophagogastric cancer PDXs recapitulate the genomic heterogeneity and tumor biology of patients. This panel represents one of the largest described collections of esophagogastric cancer PDXs and serves as a powerful platform to investigate mechanisms driving tumor growth and metastasis, identify predictive biomarkers for treatment responsiveness and develop novel genomically-driven therapeutic strategies.
The incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus-associated gastric cancer in an Irish population.
Authors: Weadick Catherine , McLaughlin Ronan Andrew , Ramsey Megan , Al-Julandani Nabila , Power Derek Gerard , Bennett Michael William , Aird John , Duffy Austin G. 
Published: January 2021

236 Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma is the fourth most frequent cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer deaths. According to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) 9% of gastric carcinomas are associated with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). EBV- associated gastric carcinoma (EBV-GC) has distinct clinicopathological features, with a marked lymphocytic infiltrate, a generally diffuse histological type and a better prognosis. The immune cell infiltration in EBV-GC suggests a role for immune checkpoint inhibition, which currently has modest activity in unselected gastric cancer. Methods: All cases of gastric or junctional adenocarcinoma diagnosed between Jan 2019 and March 2020 in Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (MMUH) and Jan 2017 and Jan 2019 in Cork University Hospital (CUH) were identified. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed to collect demographic and clinicopathological data such as AJCC TNM stage, tumour subtype and grade, HER-2 status, MMR proficiency and EBV status as determined by EBV-encoded RNA in situ hybridization. Results: N = 103 cases of gastric or junctional adenocarcinoma were identified. 67 male, 36 female, median age 64.5 (range 34 – 95). 40/103 had undergone surgical resection. EBER-ISH was assessed in all patients. 8 of 103 (7.8%) patients showed EBV positivity. These cases were all male patients, median age 62 (range 51-73). The tumours were located as follows; 2 in the cardia, 5 in the body and 1 not documented. The specimens were graded as; 87.5% (7/8) tumours being poorly differentiated and 1/8 moderate to poorly differentiated. The tumour subtypes were specified as; 62.5% (5/8) diffuse, 12.5% (1/8) intestinal and 25% (2/8) mixed intestinal and diffuse. 5/8 patients were locally confined and underwent resection for N0 disease. 3/8 (37.5%) patients had metastatic disease. None of the 8 EBV-GC cases were identified as being HER-2 positive or MMR-deficient. Conclusions: EBV-GC accounted for 7.8% of all gastric cancers in two large tertiary referral centres in Ireland. 37.5% of these patients had metastatic disease. Given this frequency and a possible predictive role in selecting for immunotherapy we conclude that routine assessment of EBV status is feasible in advanced gastric cancer.
Clinical outcomes with multikinase inhibitors after progression on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multinational, multicenter retrospective study.
Authors: Yoo Changhoon , Kim Jwa Hoon , Ryu Min-Hee , Park Sook Ryun , Lee Joycelyn Jie Xin , Tai Wai Meng David , Chan Stephen Lam , Ryoo Baek-Yeol 
Published: January 2021

272 Background: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab is the new standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the optimal sequence of therapy after disease progression on atezolizumab-bevacizumab is unclear. Methods: This multinational, multicenter, retrospective study assessed clinical outcomes of patients with advanced HCC who received subsequent systemic therapy after progression on atezolizumab-bevacizumab in Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore between July 2016 and April 2019. Results: A total of 49 patients were included; the median age was 60 years (range, 3780) and 73.5% were male. All patients were classified as Child-Pugh A and Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer stage C. Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), including sorafenib (n = 29), lenvatinib (n = 19), and cabozantinib (n = 1), were used as second-line therapy for all patients. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 6.1% and 63.3%, respectively, in all patients. With a median follow-up duration of 11.0 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.84.9) and 14.7 months (95% CI 8.121.2) in all patients. Median PFS with lenvatinib was significantly longer than that with sorafenib (6.1 months vs. 2.5 months; P= 0.004), although there was no significant difference in median OS (16.6 months vs. 11.2 months; P= 0.347). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade and grade 3 occurred in 42 (85.7%) and 8 (16.3%) of patients. Common TRAEs included hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (n = 26, 53.1%), fatigue (n = 14, 28.6%), hypertension (n = 14, 28.6%), and diarrhea (n = 12, 24.5%). Conclusions: Second-line treatment with MKIs, mostly sorafenib and lenvatinib, showed comparable efficacy and manageable toxicities in patients with advanced HCC after disease progression on atezolizumab-bevacizumab.
Risk factors, treatment patterns and survival of patients with incident hepatocellular carcinoma in France: A retrospective data analysis.
Authors: Mathurin Philippe , De Zelicourt Marie , Kelkouli Nadia , Blanc Jean-frederic 
Published: January 2021

284 Background: Despite the screening of patients at risk, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often diagnosed at an advanced stage disease, with a very poor prognosis. Aim: To describe risk factors, treatment patterns and survival of patients with newly diagnosed HCC in France over the period 2015-2017 using SNDS, the national administrative healthcare database covering around 99% of the population. Methods: The database was searched for patients with a diagnosis of HCC (ICD-10: C220) from 1 January 2015–31 December 2017. Disease stage (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B, C or D classification) was defined by the identification of treatment: transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radioembolization (TARE), HCC systemic therapy and/or best Supportive Care (BSC). Patients were followed up for a maximum of 2 years. Results: 21,071 patients were identified, mean age 69.2 years (SD: 11.1), 82.2% were male. Liver disease or diabetes was identified in 86.4% of patients. The most frequent risk factors were alcohol liver disease (42.7%), viral hepatitis and alcohol liver disease (7.2%), viral hepatitis alone (12.6%), NASH/NAFLD or diabetes (17.7%). At diagnosis, 6,571 (31.2%) received a curative HCC treatment. Within the total population, 8,616 patients (40.9%) were only managed by BSC, 6,571 (31.2%) received a treatment therapy, of which 3,184 (15.1%) had a TACE or TARE and 2 700 (12.8%) sorafenib. The 1-year survival rates by initial treatment were: curative (88.7%), TACE or TARE (70%), systemic therapy (32.2%) and only 17.8% with BSC. Conclusions: These results show the high burden of HCC, with more than two thirds of patients not receiving active treatment.
The implications of treatment delays in adjuvant therapy for cholangiocarcinoma patients.
Authors: Parsons Matthew , Lloyd Shane , Johnson Skyler B , Scaife Courtney L. , Garrido-Laguna Ignacio , Tao Randa 
Published: January 2021

291 Background: To understand the factors associated with timing of adjuvant therapy in the management of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and the impact of delays on overall survival (OS). Methods: Data from the NCDB for patients with pathologically proven non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the bile ducts from 2004 to 2014 were pooled and screened. Patients were included only if they underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (CMT) and/or radiotherapy (RT). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy or received CMT or RT with palliative intent were excluded. Pearson’s chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the distribution of demographic, clinical, and treatment factors. After propensity-score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting, OS was compared between patients who had initiation of adjuvant therapy past various time points using Kaplan Meier analyses and doubly-robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: In total, 7,422 patients in our analysis underwent adjuvant treatment. This represented 43% of the study cohort of 17,123 patients. Of the patients who underwent adjuvant treatment, 3,956 (53%) initiated adjuvant therapy by two months, 6,234 (84%) by 3 months and 6,987 (94%) by four months. High-grade disease, macroscopically positive margins, tumors larger than five centimeters, and unknown LVSI status, were associated with earlier initiation of adjuvant treatment at two months or earlier. Patients who received early adjuvant therapy were also more likely to be treated with a combination of CMT and RT. Factors associated with delay of adjuvant therapy beyond three months post-surgery included Charlson scores of one or greater and Hispanic race. After propensity score weighting, there was no survival difference between groups when comparing initiation of adjuvant therapy before or after two, three or four month time points Conclusions: We identified a number of patient characteristics related to the timing of initiating adjuvant therapy in patients with biliary cancers. There were no significant difference in OS associated with delaying adjuvant therapy beyond two, three or four month time-points. Our findings are relevant in the era of COVID-19 when minimizing patient exposure to health-care settings during a pandemic may need to be considered when deciding on the timing of adjuvant therapy. If a delay is necessary, our results suggest that there is no survival detriment to initiating adjuvant therapy beyond three or four months after surgery for biliary cancers.
Early tumor marker decrease to predict the efficacy of combination therapy with lenvatinib plus anti-PD-1 antibodies in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).
Authors: Sun Hui-Chuan , Zhu Xiao-Dong , Huang Cheng , Shen Ying-Hao , Ge Ning-Ling , Zhu Jin-Jin , Xu Bin , Chen Yi , Li Mei-Ling , Zhou Jian , Fan Jia 
Published: January 2021

304 Background: Combination therapy with anti-angiogenic agents plus anti-PD-1 antibodies has shown high anti-tumor activity in uHCC. However, predicting the efficacy of this combination therapy remains a challenge. Methods: This study included consecutive patients with uHCC who received lenvatinib (8 mg/d regardless of body weight) and an anti-PD-1 antibody as first-line systemic therapy between Sep 2018 and July 2020, and had at least one imaging evaluation. Tumor response was assessed every 2 months (± 2 week) by the investigators using modified RECIST criteria. Patients were evaluated as having a radiological response (complete or partial response) or non-radiological response (stable disease or progressive disease) at the best overall response evaluation. Serum tumor markers for HCC, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), were evaluated at baseline and 2-3 weeks after therapy was initiated and their association with radiological response were assessed. Patients with baseline AFP or PIVKA-II between the upper limit of normal and the maximum measuring range of the kit were evaluable for AFP decrease or PIVKA-II decrease. Results: A total of 76 patients were eligible for this study. Baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL or PIVKA-II ≥400 mAU/mL was not associated with radiological response (P = 0.167 and P = 0.916, respectively). At 2-3 weeks after the initiation of therapy, 51 patients were evaluable for AFP decrease; 78.4% experienced a > 20% AFP decrease and 51.0% experienced a > 50% AFP decrease. Patients with a > 50% AFP decrease had a higher rate of radiological response than those with AFP increase or a ≤50% AFP decrease (73.1% vs 32.0%, P = 0.003). In 57 patients evaluable for PIVKA-II decrease, 50.9% and 35.1% experienced a > 20% and > 50% PIVKA-II decrease, respectively. Patients with a > 50% PIVKA-II decrease had a higher rate of radiological response than those with PIVKA-II increase or a ≤50% PIVKA-II decrease (85.0% vs 29.7%, P < 0.001). Both AFP decrease > 50% and PIVKA-II decrease > 50% predicted radiological response, with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.706 (95% CI, 0.560-0.852, P = 0.012) and 0.752 (95% CI, 0.621-0.883, P = 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, patients with a > 20% AFP or PIVKA-II increase from baseline had a lower rate of radiological response (0% vs 57.4%, P = 0.043; and 21.7% vs 69.7%, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: A tumor marker decrease was seen in most patients as early as 2-3 weeks after the initiation of the combination therapy. Early on-treatment AFP or PIVKA-II decrease may serve as a predictor for objective response for patients with uHCC receiving combination anti-angiogenic and immune therapy.