Abstract PS10-06: Comparative analysis of anti-proliferative effects and gene profiling of lapatinib, neratinib, and tucatinib
Authors: Conlon Neil T , Kooijman Jeffrey J , van Gerwen Suzanne JC , Mulder Winfried R , Zaman Guido JR , Diala Irmina , Eli Lisa D , Lalani Alshad S , Crown John , Collins Denis 
Published: February 2021

Abstract
Introduction: Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2/ERBB2) is frequently amplified or mutated across various cancer types. The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) lapatinib, neratinib, and tucatinib are FDA-approved for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. All three TKIs bind and inhibit the kinase domain of HER2 but differ both in the mechanism of binding and in specificity for other HER family members. Direct comparisons to differentiate the pre-clinical efficacy of the three TKIs have been limited to small-scale studies and novel biomarkers of response to further define appropriate patient populations are required. Methods: In this study, the anti-proliferative effects of the three TKIs were compared using a 115-cancer cell line panel, including 12 breast cancer cell lines and 22 cell lines harbouring point mutations or amplifications of EGFR, HER2, or HER3. Hierarchical clustering analysis was carried out to compare the IC50 “fingerprint” of the three TKIs to 168 other anti-cancer agents. Novel markers of TKI sensitivity and resistance were identified through cross-analysis of each drug response profile with mutation, copy number variation, and gene expression data. Results: All three TKIs were effective against HER2-positive breast cancer models; neratinib showed the most potent activity, followed by tucatinib and lapatinib respectively (Table 1). Neratinib displayed the greatest anti-proliferative activity in HER2-mutant and EGFR-mutant cell lines. Clustering analysis revealed that the anti-proliferative profile of tucatinib was most similar to trastuzumab, while neratinib and lapatinib were most like other HER family inhibitors. Mutation and gene expression analysis identified potential markers of response for each TKI. High expression of four genes (HER2, VTCN1, CDK12, and RAC1) correlated with response to all three TKIs. DNA damage repair genes were significantly associated with resistance to the HER2-targeted TKIs. BRCA2 mutation was correlated with neratinib and tucatinib response, and high gene expression of ATM, BRCA2, and BRCA1 were all associated with neratinib resistance. Conclusions: Neratinib was the most effective HER2-targeted TKI against HER2-amplified, -mutant, and EGFR-mutant cell lines. This analysis revealed possible mechanisms that may be exploited using combinatorial strategies involving CDK inhibitors, immunotherapies, and targeting DNA repair pathways.
Table: IC50 values for neratinib, lapatinib, and tucatinib in the HER2+ breast cancer cell linesIC50 values (nM)Cell linesNeratinibLapatinibTucatinibAU-56520294125BT-4745926229HCC195413814262122MDA-MB-453306228445928SKBR3715222
Citation Format: Neil T Conlon, Jeffrey J Kooijman, Suzanne JC van Gerwen, Winfried R Mulder, Guido JR Zaman, Irmina Diala, Lisa D Eli, Alshad S Lalani, John Crown, Denis Collins. Comparative analysis of anti-proliferative effects and gene profiling of lapatinib, neratinib, and tucatinib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-06.