bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide for enzalutamide-resistant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Updated analyses after one additional year of follow-up from cohorts 4 and 5 of the KEYNOTE-199 study.
Authors: Graff Julie N , Tagawa Scott T. , Hoimes Christopher J. , Gerritsen Winald R. , Vaishampayan Ulka N. , Elliott Tony , Hwang Clara , Ten Tije A. J. , Omlin Aurelius , McDermott Raymond S. , Fradet Yves , Kilari Deepak , Ferrario Cristiano , Uemura Hiroji , Niu Cuizhen , Poehlein Christian Heinrich , De Wit Ronald , Schloss Charles , De Bono Johann S. , Antonarakis Emmanuel S. 
Published: June 2021

5042 Background: KEYNOTE-199 (NCT02787005) is a multicohort phase 2 study to evaluate pembrolizumab (pembro) in mCRPC. A previous analysis of patients with RECIST-measurable (cohort 4 [C4]) or bone-predominant nonmeasurable (cohort 5 [C5]) disease who were chemotherapy-naive and had progression while on enzalutamide (enza) found that pembro + enza showed antitumor activity and manageable safety. Long-term outcomes are of interest with immunotherapy; hence, updated efficacy and safety data after an additional 1 year of follow-up are presented. Methods: Pts were eligible if they had resistance to enza after prior response. Prior treatment with abiraterone was allowed. Pts received pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles + enza QD until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary end point was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) in C4. Secondary end points were DOR (C4), and DCR, rPFS, OS and safety (both cohorts). Results: 126 pts (C4, 81; C5, 45) were treated. Median age was 72 years (range 43-92), 32.5% had visceral disease and 87.3% previously received ≥6 mo of enzalutamide; 121 pts (96.0%) discontinued, most because of progressive disease. Median (range) time from enrollment to data cutoff was 31.7 mo (23.1-37.1) in C4 and 35.5 mo (22.9-37.3) in C5. In C4, confirmed ORR was 12.3% (95% CI 6.1-21.5) (2 CRs, 8 PRs); median (range) DOR was 8.1 mo (2.5+ to 15.2), and 62.5% had a response ≥6 mo (Kaplan-Meier estimate). Additional efficacy analyses are outlined in the table. A total of 27.2% and 28.9% of pts in C4 and C5, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. Two pts in C4 died of immune-related AEs (Miller Fisher syndrome and myasthenia gravis). Incidence of any-grade (34.1%) and grade 3 or 4 (5.6%) rash, regardless of relatedness to treatment, was higher than previously reported for individual agents but manageable with standard-of-care treatments; 2 pts discontinued because of rash. Conclusions: After an additional 1 year of follow-up, pembro + enza continued to show antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with mCRPC who became resistant to enza. The treatment combination is being further evaluated in the ongoing phase 3 KEYNOTE-641 trial (NCT03834493). Clinical trial information: NCT02787005. [Table: see text]
Radiographic progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint of overall survival in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.
Authors: Halabi Susan , Roy Akash , Yang Qian , Xie Wanling , Kelly William Kevin , Sweeney Christopher 
Published: June 2021

5057 Background: Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) is commonly used as a co-primary endpoint in randomized clinical trials in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, rPFS has not been established as a valid surrogate endpoint of overall survival (OS) in men with mCRPC. Here, we hypothesized that rPFS is a reliable surrogate for OS in mCRPC. We also explored whether PFS is a valid surrogate endpoint of OS at the aggregate trial level. Methods: We performed a systematic search of the literature encompassing the period January 2004-December 2020 using PubMed and clinical trials.gov to identify completed phase III trials in mCRPC post-docetaxel. Eligible trials had to be randomized phase III therapeutic trials that reported OS, PFS or rPFS. OS was measured from the date of random assignment to date of death from any cause or date of last follow-up. rPFS was defined as the time from random assignment to date of disease progression on CT and/or Tc bone scan per trial definition or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS included PSA progression as a component of the composite endpoint. Trial level surrogacy was evaluated by fitting linear regression on the treatment effect of rPFS (or PFS) and OS (in other words, the weighted linear regression of the log(hazard ratio) of OS on the log(hazard ratio) of rPFS). It was pre-specified that rPFS would be considered a valid surrogate for OS if R² was 0·7 or higher. Results: We identified 33 in men with mCRPC post docetaxel approval. We assessed the association between PFS and OS in 29,456 patients from 30 trials. Overall, a moderate correlation was observed at the trial level between OS and PFS ( R2 = 0.46, 95 %CI = 0.20-0.68) in these trials. In 18 trials with 16,818 mCRPC patients where rPFS was considered as a key endpoint, a moderate correlation between the treatment effects on rPFS and OS was observed at the trial level ( R2= 0.65, 95% CI = 0.23-0.87). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates moderate correlation between treatment effects of rPFS and OS in patients with mCRPC. However, rPFS did not meet the pre-specified surrogacy threshold of 0.7. Clinical trial information: several.
Genomic landscape of MSH6-mutated clinically advanced castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Authors: Bratslavsky Gennady , Decker Brennan , Jacob Joseph M , Necchi Andrea , Spiess Philippe E. , Grivas Petros , Lin Douglas I. , Ramkissoon Shakti H. , Severson Eric Allan , Huang Richard S.P. , Mata Douglas A. , Madison Russell , Montesion Meagan , Gjoerup Ole , Sokol Ethan , Pavlick Dean C. , Danziger Natalie , Ross Jeffrey S. 
Published: June 2021

5062 Background: Loss-of-function genomic alterations (GAs) in MSH6 have been associated with a unique subtype of hypermutated mCRPC that is often microsatellite stable (MSS) and may occur in either a sporadic or familial Lynch Syndrome-like clinical setting. Methods: 5,617 mCRPC cases were sequenced to evaluate all classes of GA using a hybrid capture-based FDA-approved comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined on 0.8 Mb of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability high (MSI-High) was determined on 95 loci. MSI-low status was not assessed. Results: 78 (1.4%) mCRPC were MSH6mut (Table). MSH6mut mCRPC included 73.1% short variant mutations, 23.1% biallelic deletions, 2.6% genomic rearrangements, and 1.3% multiple GAs/sample. Co-mutation of MSH2 was found in 28% of MSH6mut cases vs. 2% in MSH6wt cases (P <.0001) and was most frequently caused by biallelic co-deletion of both genes (73% of co-mutated cases). MSI-High status was present in 46% of MSH6mut mCRPC, which was significantly greater than the 2% seen in MSH6wt cases (P <.0001). An MMR single nucleotide mutational signature was observed in 65% of MSH6mut cases, compared to 3% MSH6wt cases (P <.0001). Among MSH6mut cases with neither MSI-High nor MMR mutational signature, 87% did not have biallelic loss of MSH6 or any other MMR gene, confirming that monoallelic pathogenic mutations are insufficient to cause the MMR-D phenotype. For subjects whose variants could be classified, 45% (19/42) of pathogenic MSH6 alleles were germline; of these, 58% (11/19) had neither MSI-High nor an MMR single nucleotide signature. MSH6mut cases had fewer TMPRSS2: ERG fusions (P =.01), but harbored significantly higher frequencies of GAs in AR (P =.0002), ATM (P =.04), PIK3CA (P =.0003), APC (P =.005), ERBB2 (P =.001), and CDK6 (p =.046), likely at least partially attributable to the higher TMB in MSH6mutcases (P <.0001). Conclusions: MSH6mut mCRPC is a unique disease that often features a hypermutated genomic signature, although only 46% of cases exhibited MSI-high status. This complex phenotype highlights the potential utility of multiple rather than single biomarkers to understand tumor biology and determine patients who may benefit from immunotherapy.[Table: see text]
The efficacy of enzalutamide (ENZA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on bone oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A post hoc analysis of ARCHES.
Authors: Armstrong Andrew J. , Iguchi Taro , Azad Arun , Villers Arnauld , Alekseev Boris , Petrylak Daniel P. , Szmulewitz Russell Zelig , Alcaraz Antonio , Shore Neal D. , Holzbeierlein Jeffrey , Gomez-Veiga Francisco , Rosbrook Brad , Zohren Fabian , Haas Gabriel P. , Gourgioti Georgia , El-Chaar Nader N. , Stenzl Arnulf 
Published: June 2021

5071 Background: In ARCHES (NCT02677896), ENZA + ADT reduced the risk of radiographic progression and improved secondary clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) with variable patterns of disease spread over placebo (PBO) + ADT. This post hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ENZA + ADT in patients with bone oligometastatic mHSPC compared to polymetastatic mHSPC in ARCHES. Methods: Patients with mHSPC (n = 1150) were randomized 1:1 to ENZA (160 mg/day) + ADT or PBO + ADT, stratified by disease volume and prior docetaxel chemotherapy. This post hoc analysis included patients with bone metastases only, categorized as oligometastatic (1–≤5 metastases) or as polymetastatic (≥6 metastases) based on central review at screening. Efficacy outcomes were compared across treatment arms. Results: Of the ARCHES population with bone metastases (n = 512), the largest subgroup included patients with ≤5 metastases (ENZA + ADT, n = 160; PBO + ADT, n = 136). Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between treatment arms and across subgroups. When compared to PBO + ADT, ENZA + ADT improved rPFS and secondary endpoints in patients with ≤5 metastases (Table). Similar results were observed across other oligometastatic subgroups (1–≤4) as well as in polymetastatic disease (≥6). The safety profile of ENZA + ADT versus PBO + ADT was similar across subgroups and consistent with previous findings. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis demonstrates that ENZA + ADT provides clinical benefit across bone oligometastatic as well as polymetastatic mHSPC, supporting the utility of ENZA irrespective of metastatic burden in the ARCHES study. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896. [Table: see text]
Outcome of breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy compared with non-pregnant controls.
Authors: Amant Frederic , Nekljudova Valentina , Maggen Charlotte , Seither Fenja , Neven Patrick , Cardonick Elyce , Schmatloch Sabine , Van Calsteren Kristel , Cordes Tatjana , de Haan Jorine , Lok Christianne AR , Bechtner Christina , Boere Ingrid A. , Gziri Mina Mhallem , Solbach Christine , Lefrère Hanne , Schneeweiss Andreas , Witzel Isabell , Seiler Sabine , Loibl Sibylle 
Published: June 2021

515 Background: Overall a diagnosis of breast cancer during pregnancy (BCP) appears not to impact maternal prognosis if standard treatment is offered. However, caution is warranted as gestational changes in pharmacokinetics with respect to the distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs may lead to reduced chemotherapy concentration in pregnant patients. This cohort study was designed to focus on the maternal prognosis of BCP patients that receive chemotherapy during pregnancy. Methods: The outcome of BCP patients treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy was compared to non-pregnant breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, diagnosed after 2000, excluding postpartum diagnosis and with an age limit of 45 years. The data was registered by two multicentric registries (the International Network of Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy and the German Breast Cancer Group) that collect both retro-and prospectively breast cancer data. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between both groups, adjusting for age, stage, grade, hormone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor 2 status and histology, weighted by propensity scoring in order to account for the differences in baseline characteristics between pregnant patients and controls. Results: In total, 662 pregnant and 2081 non-pregnant patients, were eligible for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 34 (range 22-47) years for pregnant and 38 (range 19-45) years for non-pregnant patients. Pregnant patients were more likely to have stage II breast cancer (60.1% vs 56.1%, p = 0.035), grade 3 tumors (74.0% vs 62.2%, p < 0.001), hormone receptor-negative tumors (48.4% vs 34.0%, p < 0.001) or triple-negative breast cancer (38.9% vs 26.9%, p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 66 months. DFS and OS were comparable for pregnant and non-pregnant patients (DFS: HR 1.02, 95%CI 0.82-1.27, p = 0.83; OS: HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81-1.45, p = 0.59). A subgroup analysis of 339 women that received more than 60% of chemotherapy during pregnancy (cut-off at median) revealed a comparable survival compared to non-pregnant women (DFS: HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.62-1.06, p = 0.13; OS: HR 0.85 95% CI 0.58-1.23, p = 0.39). Conclusions: Pregnancy-induced alternations in chemotherapy concentration do not seem to affect maternal prognosis in breast cancer patients. These results support initiation of chemotherapy for BCP where indicated for oncological reasons.
Efficacy and safety analysis of Chinese patients in monarchE: Abemaciclib combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy for high risk HR+, HER2- early breast cancer.
Authors: Zhimin Shao , Zhang Qingyuan , Song Chuan-gui , Ouyang Quchang , Liu Zhenzhen , Liu Qiang , Feng Jifeng , Chiu Joanne Wing Yan , Tseng Ling-Ming , Qian Chenxi 
Published: June 2021

522 Background: In monarchE, abemaciclib (oral CDK4&6 inhibitor) plus endocrine therapy (ET) as adjuvant treatment for HR+, HER2- high risk early breast cancer (EBC), demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) compared to ET alone. Here we present the efficacy and safety analysis of Chinese patients from monarchE. Methods: The overall study design was reported previously. Eligible patients were randomized to receive abemaciclib (150 mg BID for 2 years) combined with standard adjuvant ET or ET alone. The primary endpoint was IDFS per STEEP criteria. Secondary endpoints included distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), overall survival, and safety. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted among Chinese patients enrolled from Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Results: A total of 501 Chinese patients were randomized to receive abemaciclib plus ET (259 patients) or ET alone (242 patients). At the time of data cutoff (July 8, 2020), 356 (71.1%) patients were still in the 2-year treatment period. A total of 26 IDFS events were observed (11 and 15 events in abemaciclib plus ET and ET arm, respectively). Comparing to ET alone, abemaciclib combined with ET reduced the risk of developing invasive disease or death by 34.3% (HR: 0.657, 95% CI: 0.301, 1.435) for Chinese patients, together with a clinically meaningful improvement in the 2-year IDFS rate (95.6% vs 92.1%). The addition of abemaciclib to ET also resulted in an improvement in DRFS (HR: 0.601, 95% CI: 0.245, 1.477) for Chinese patients, with the 2-year DRFS rate at 96.7% (ET alone: 93.4%). In the abemaciclib arm, the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and grade ≥3 TEAEs: diarrhea (90.3% and 5.0%), leukopenia (76.8% and 21.2%), and neutropenia (76.4% and 23.9%), respectively. Conclusions: Abemaciclib combined with adjuvant ET demonstrated clinically meaningful IDFS and DRFS benefits among Chinese patients with HR+, HER2-, high risk EBC, which was consistent with the ITT population as reported previously. The safety profile of abemaciclib in Chinese EBC patients was consistent with global population and also with that observed in Chinese metastatic breast cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03155997.
Association between treatment duration and overall survival in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer patients receiving extended adjuvant therapy with neratinib in the ExteNET trial.
Authors: Moy Beverly , Takahashi Masato , Ohtani Shoichiro , Chmielowska Ewa , Yamamoto Naohito , Coudert Bruno P. , Xu Feng , Wong Alvin F. , Chan Arlene 
Published: June 2021

540 Background: Completion of planned treatment has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. In the ExteNET trial (NCT00878709), where diarrhea prophylaxis was not mandated, 17% of patients (pts) discontinued neratinib early due to diarrhea. This compares with 3.3% of pts from the CONTROL trial (NCT02400476) who used a neratinib dose-escalation strategy. Prior analyses have shown improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in pts who completed planned duration of neratinib therapy in ExteNET (Table). Here we assess outcomes, including overall survival (OS), for pts who completed planned therapy in 3 groups from ExteNET: intent-to-treat (ITT) population; pts with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease who initiated neratinib within 1y after prior trastuzumab (HR+/≤1y, the population neratinib is approved for in the EU); and HR+/≤1y with residual disease post-neoadjuvant therapy (no pathologic complete response [pCR]). Methods: Pts with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer received oral neratinib 240 mg/d or placebo after trastuzumab-based (neo)adjuvant therapy. Pts who completed neratinib therapy (defined as ≥11m or cessation of neratinib if recurrence occurred prior to 11m) were compared with placebo (all randomized pts). iDFS and OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods; hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional-hazards models. Data cutoff: July 2019. Results: There were 2840 pts in the ITT population. The table shows iDFS and OS in the overall population and in pts who completed planned duration of neratinib therapy. Completion of planned neratinib was associated with improvements in iDFS and OS in all groups evaluated. Conclusions: These descriptive findings suggest that pts who receive the recommended duration of treatment of 1y with neratinib may have improved outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT00878709. [Table: see text]
Long-term outcomes of patients with node-negative (N0), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy according to stromal TILs (sTILs).
Authors: Leon-Ferre Roberto Antonio , Carter Jodi M , Hillman David W. , Tenner Kathleen S. , Zahrieh David , Liu Minetta C. , Ingle James N. , Kalari Krishna R. , Visscher Daniel W. , Boughey Judy Caroline , Couch Fergus , Goetz Matthew P. 
Published: June 2021

548 Background: sTILs are a well-established prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with operable TNBC receiving pre or postoperative systemic therapy. We1 and others2,3 have also shown that sTILs are prognostic in patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Here, we detail the outcomes of systemically untreated patients with N0 TNBC according to sTIL score. We focused on the N0 subset as a group of patients who may be candidates for future prospective therapy de-escalation trials. Methods: From a clinically annotated cohort of 605 patients with centrally confirmed TNBC (ER/PR < 1% and HER2 negative) with long-term outcomes data, we identified 182 patients treated with locoregional therapy only (breast surgery +/- radiation therapy and no chemotherapy). The clinicopathological characteristics of this cohort have previously been published1. In this analysis, we report the 5- and 10-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of patients with N0 TNBC according to sTIL levels. IDFS and OS were defined as per the STEEP classification and estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Comparisons of the survival distributions between groups were assessed by the log-rank test. sTILs were assessed as a continuous parameter according to the International TIL Working Group guidelines. For comparisons of outcomes between groups, tumors were classified as lymphocyte-predominant TNBC (defined as containing ≥50% sTILs) vs non-lymphocyte-predominant ( < 50% sTILs). Results: Of 182 systemically untreated patients, 149 (82%) were N0 and most (78%) were post-menopausal. T stage distribution was T1: 68%, T2: 28%, T3/4: 4%. Among N0 patients, 31 (21%) had lymphocyte-predominant TNBC, and in this group the 5-year iDFS and OS were 89% (95% CI 76-100) and 96% (95% CI 89-100), while the 10-year iDFS and OS were 89% (95% CI 76-100) and 87% (95% CI 73-100), respectively. In contrast, outcomes for patients with non-lymphocyte predominant TNBC were significantly worse. For this group, 5-year iDFS and OS were 62% (95% CI 53-73) and 78% (95% CI 71-86) while the 10-year iDFS and OS were 45% (95% CI 36-58) and 66% (95% CI 68-76), respectively ( log-rank p = 0.02 for iDFS and log-rank p = 0.03 for OS). Conclusions: sTIL quantification identifies a subset of patients with early-stage N0 TNBC with an exceedingly good prognosis, even in the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. These data provide support for the evaluation of sTILs as part of prospective investigation of systemic therapy de-escalation strategies in N0 TNBC. References:1Leon-Ferre et al, Breast Cancer Res Treat (2018) 167:89-99 2Park et al, Ann Oncol (2019) 12:1941-1949 3De Jong et al, ESMO 2020