bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
The impact of a genomic sequencing classifier (GSC) on clinical decision making in patients with a high-risk lung nodule.
Authors: Sethi Sonali , Oh Scott , Chen Alexander , Bellinger Christina , Lofaro Lori , Tom Jennifer , Johnson Marla , Huang Jing , Bhorade Sangeeta Maruti , Kennedy Giulia 
Published: June 2021

8549 Background: Current guidelines recommend that patients who have lung nodules with high risk of malignancy (ROM) ( > 65%) should undergo surgical and other ablative therapies. However, prior studies have shown that clinicians may opt for more conservative management in these high-risk patients. Percepta Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC), a RNA-seq based classifier derived from bronchial epithelial cells to assess risk of lung cancer, was designed to risk stratify lung nodules by both down classifying ROM as a “rule -out“ test with high sensitivity as well as up-classifying ROM as a “rule- in” test with high specificity for malignancy. This study assesses the impact of up-classification of high ROM to very high- risk (ROM > 90%) by Percepta GSC in increasing the number of ablative therapies recommended for high-risk lung nodules. Methods: This prospective randomized decision impact survey included 37 patients from the AEGIS I/ II cohorts and the Percepta Registry who were undergoing work up of a lung nodule and had a high ROM that was up-classified to very high ROM by Percepta GSC. 97 physicians assessed 10 randomly assigned patient cases. They then responded to a survey designed to test the hypothesis that including a Percepta GSC result will increase the recommendation for surgical or other ablative therapy in very high- risk patients as well as their level of confidence of this recommendation. Physicians were first presented with the patient’s clinical information without Percepta GSC and then with Percepta GSC. Results: 97 physicians provided a total of 682 evaluations of 37 patients. In this study, the recommendation for surgical or other ablative therapy increased from 19/341 (5.6%) prior to the Percepta GSC result to 157/341 (46%) after the Percepta GSC result (odds ratio of 4.76, p-value < 0.001). The number of extremely confident recommendations increased from 72/341 (21%) without Percepta GSC to 106/341 (31%) with Percepta GSC. Significantly more physicians had increased confidence in their recommended next step post-Percepta GSC when collapsing the confidence level responses into increased confidence (n = 93) and decreased confidence (n = 44) (p-value = 0.002). Conclusions: Percepta GSC had a quantifiable impact on clinical decision making. It increased the number of surgical and other ablative therapies recommended when patients were re-classified from high to very high- risk of lung cancer with a higher confidence in the recommended next step. By up-classifying nodules from high to very high ROM, Percepta GSC will improve the likelihood and timeliness of appropriate therapies and assist clinicians more effectively manage patients to improve patient outcomes.
Pooled analyses of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and efficacy from the phase 3 trials IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150.
Authors: Socinski Mark A. , Jotte Robert M. , Cappuzzo Federico , Nishio Makoto , Mok Tony S. K. , Reck Martin , Finley Gene Grant , Yu Wei , Patel Hina , Paranthaman Nindhana , Bara Ilze , West Howard 
Published: June 2021

9002 Background: PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors have transformed the treatment (tx) of advanced NSCLC. Evidence suggests that the occurrence of irAEs with these agents may predict improved outcomes in cancers such as NSCLC. Atezolizumab (atezo; anti–PD-L1) has shown efficacy and tolerability in NSCLC and is currently approved in the 1L and 2L+ settings. The Ph 3 IMpower130, IMpower132 and IMpower150 trials evaluated atezo + chemo ± bevacizumab (bev) as 1L tx of NSCLC. We explore the association between irAEs and efficacy in these trials. Methods: Each trial enrolled tx-naive patients (pts) with nonsquamous stage IV NSCLC. Pts were randomized to: carboplatin (carbo) + nab-paclitaxel alone or with atezo in IMpower130; carbo or cisplatin alone or with atezo in IMpower132; atezo (A) + bev (B) + carbo + paclitaxel (CP), ACP or BCP in IMpower150. Data were pooled (data cutoffs: Mar 15 2018 [IMpower130]; May 22 2018 [IMpower132]; Sep 13 2019 [IMpower150]) and analyzed by tx (atezo-containing vs control) and irAE status. A time-dependent Cox model and landmark analyses at 1, 3, 6 and 12 mo were used to control for immortal bias. Study protocols required atezo tx interruption/discontinuation for grade (Gr) ≥3 irAEs. Results: 2503 pts were included in the analysis (atezo, n = 1577; control, n = 926). In both arms, baseline characteristics were generally balanced between pts with irAEs (atezo, n = 753; control, n = 289) and without irAEs (atezo, n = 824; control, n = 637). Any-Gr irAEs occurred in 48% (atezo) and 32% (control) of pts; Gr 3-5 irAEs occurred in 11% (atezo) and 5% (control). The most common irAEs (atezo vs control) were rash (28% vs 18%), hepatitis (lab abnormalities; 15% vs 10%) and hypothyroidism (12% vs 4%). Median time to onset of first irAE was 1.7 (atezo) vs 1.4 mo (control). OS HRs (95% CI) from the time-dependent Cox model between pts with vs without irAEs were 0.69 (0.60, 0.78) in the atezo arm and 0.82 (0.68, 0.99) in the control arm; after excluding rash (perceived as the least specific irAE), OS HRs (95% CI) were 0.75 (0.65, 0.87) and 0.90 (0.71, 1.12), respectively. OS landmark data are in the Table. Conclusions: In this exploratory pooled analysis, pts with irAEs had longer OS vs pts without irAEs in the atezo-containing and control arms per the time-dependent Cox model and landmark analyses; this trend remained for the atezo arm after excluding rash. Landmark analyses suggest that in the atezo arm, pts with Gr 1/2 irAEs had the longest OS and pts with Gr ≥3 irAEs had the shortest OS, potentially due to tx interruption/discontinuation. Clinical trial information: NCT02367781; NCT02657434; NCT02366143. [Table: see text]
Final OS analysis from the phase III j-alex study of alectinib (ALC) versus crizotinib (CRZ) in Japanese ALK-inhibitor naïve ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC).
Authors: Yoshioka Hiroshige , Hida Toyoaki , Nokihara Hiroshi , Morise Masahiro , Kim Young Hak , Azuma Koichi , Seto Takashi , Takiguchi Yuichi , Nishio Makoto , Kumagai Toru , Hotta Katsuyuki , Watanabe Satoshi , Goto Koichi , Satouchi Miyako , Kozuki Toshiyuki , Nakagawa Kazuhiko , Mitsudomi Tetsuya , Yamamoto Nobuyuki , Yoshimoto Takuya , Tamura Tomohide 
Published: June 2021

9022 Background: The primary analysis of the J-ALEX (JapicCTI-132316) study for the ALK-inhibitor naïve ALK+ NSCLC demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) in Japanese patients randomized to the ALC, compared with those assigned in the CRZ (HR 0.34, 99.7% CI 0.17–0.71, stratified log-rank p<0·0001) by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) (Hida et al., Lancet 2017). The final PFS and 2nd overall survival (OS) interim analysis (IA) data were subsequently reported (Nakagawa et al., Lung cancer 2020). Here, we report the final OS data. Methods: ALK+ NSCLC (by IHC and FISH or RT-PCR) patients were randomized 1:1 either to receive ALC (Japanese approved dose 300 mg BID, n = 103) or CRZ (250 mg BID, n = 104). Stratification factors included ECOG PS, treatment line, and clinical stage. The primary endpoint was PFS according to the blinded IRF. Secondary endpoints included OS, objective response rate, and safety. Results: After a median follow-up of 68.6 months in the ALC arm and 68.0 months in the CRZ arm, death events occurred in 40.8% and 39.4% in the ALC and the CRZ arms, respectively. Five-year survival rates for patients in the ALC and CRZ arm were 60.85% and 64.11%, respectively. The final OS HR was 1.03 (95%CI 0.67-1.58), however, median OS was not reached in either arm. Of note, patients in the CRZ arm tended to have their treatment switched earlier than those in the ALC arm (median time to treatment-switch: 12.3 months vs. NE). Most of the patients (78.8%) in the CRZ arm received ALC as a 1st subsequent therapy, whereas only 10.7% of patients in the ALC arm received CRZ. Conclusions: In this final J-ALEX OS analysis, prolongation of OS in the ALC arm was not observed compared to the CRZ arm. However, OS result may be substantially confounded since 78.8% of the patients in the CRZ arm received ALC as initial, subsequent therapy. Clinical trial information: 132316.
Anti PD-(L)1 in KRAS mutant advanced nsclcs: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Authors: Landre Thierry , Justeau Gregoire , Assié Jean-baptiste , Chouahnia Kader , Taleb Chérifa , Chouaid Christos , Duchemann Boris 
Published: June 2021

9025 Background: KRAS comprise the most frequently found oncogene driver mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accounting for 20-25% of these patients. Single-agent Anti PD-(L)1 clinical efficacy against KRAS mutant NSCLC is a topic of debate. Methods: This meta-analysis examined randomized-trial data comparing first-or second line Anti PD-(L)1 +/- chemotherapy (CT) vs CT alone for KRAS mutant advanced NSCLCs. Outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Analyses were computed using the Cochrane method of collaboration for meta-analyses, with Review Manager software (RevMan version 5.3; Oxford, UK). Results: We analyzed 3 trials in first line (IMPOWER-150, KEYNOTE-189 and KEYNOTE-042), as well as 3 trials in second line (OAK, POPLAR and CHECKMATE-057) including 1313 NSCLCs (386 KRAS mutant and 927 KRAS wild-type tumor). Anti PD-(L)1 +/- CT was significantly associated (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) with prolonged OS (0.59 [0.49-0.72]; p < 0.00001) and PFS (0.58 [0.43-0.78]; p = 0.0003) compared to CT alone in KRAS mutant NSCLCs. Survival benefits occured in both first and second line. Survival benefits observed in KRAS wild-type NSCLCs were (0.87 [0.76-0.99]; p = 0.03) and (0.79 [0.56-1.11]; p = 0.17) respectively. OS benefit in KRAS mutant was significantly superior compared to OS benefit in KRAS wild-type (p = 0,001). Conclusions: Anti PD-(L)1 (+/- CT) appears superior to CT alone both for mutant and wild-type KRAS in advanced NSCLCs for OS and PFS with higher magnitude of benefit in KRAS mutated group for OS.
Efficacy and safety of pan-ErbB inhibitor pyrotinib combined with antiangiogenic agent apatinib for HER2-mutant or amplified metastatic NSCLC: A phase II clinical study.
Authors: Yang Guangjian , Xu Haiyan , Yang Lu , Zhang Shuyang , Xu Fei , Li Hongshuai , Yang Yaning , Ai Xin , Wang Yan 
Published: June 2021

9035 Background: Tumor angiogenesis could be induced by activation of HER2 receptor, and currently, there is lack of clinical evidence of anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with antiangiogenic therapy for HER2-mutant or amplified non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a study to explore the efficacy and safety of a pan-ErbB inhibitor pyrotinib combined with apatinib for metastatic NSCLC patients harboring HER2 amplification or activating mutations. Methods: This was a single-center, single-arm phase II study with Simon’s optimal two-stage design. Metastatic NSCLC patients with ECOG scores of 0-1 and harboring primary HER2 amplification, exon 20 insertion or activating missense mutations who had failed to prior chemotherapies or anti-HER2 TKIs were eligible to be enrolled. All patients received oral pyrotinib (400mg once daily) combined with apatinib (250mg once daily) therapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and second endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Between March 5, 2019, and December 1, 2020, 33 metastatic NSCLC patients with HER2 alterations were enrolled, including exon 20 insertions (A775_G776insYVMA, 20/33; P780_Y781insGSP, 6/33; other variants, 2/33), missense mutations (3/33), and primary HER2 amplification (2/33). Seventeen patients (51.5%) were pretreated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapies or anti-HER2 TKIs, and the remaining had received at least 2 lines of prior therapies (range, 2-6). At the last follow-up time January 23, 2021, the overall ORR and DCR were 45.5% (15/33) and 93.9% (31/33), respectively. The median PFS was 6.8 (95%CI: 5.4-8.2) months. The median DoR and OS were 5.3 (95%CI: 0-11.8) and 12.9 (95%CI: 8.6-17.2) months, respectively. The mPFS was significantly longer in patients who received second-line pyrotinib combined with apatinib therapy than those in third- or above-line settings (9.8 vs. 5.3 months, P = 0.018, HR = 0.281 [95%CI: 0.098-0.807]). Although pyrotinib combined with apatinib therapy showed similar ORRs in patients with presence (46.2%, 6/13) or absence (45.0%, 9/20) of brain metastases, and those in second-line (47.1%, 8/17) or above-line settings (43.8%, 7/16). Common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2, mainly including diarrhea (90.9%), hypertension (72.7%), asthenia (63.6%), anorexia (54.5%) and nausea (51.5%). Grade 3 AEs were diarrhea (3.0%) and hypertension (9.1%). No grade 4 or 5 AE or treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: Pyrotinib combined with apatinib showed potent anti-tumor activity and acceptable safety profile in metastatic NSCLC with HER2 amplification or activating mutations. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900021684.
Predicting response to pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer, by analyzing the spatial arrangement of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes using deep learning.
Authors: Ofek Efrat , Bar Jair , Zer Alona , Urban Damien , Mayer Chen , Sade Chen , Zelichov Ori , Groisman Alon , Laniado Avi , Gabay Yuval , Polychenko Willy , Gluskin Roman , Achtenberg Albert , Feinmesser Meora , Barshack Iris 
Published: June 2021

9045 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have become the standard treatment for metastatic NSCLC, although only a small proportion of patients derive durable benefit. PDL1 expression is the only approved biomarker to select NSCLC patients for treatment with single-agent pembrolizumab, however its predictive value is limited and better predictive biomarkers are needed. The spatial arrangement of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME), namely tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), emerges as a potential biomarker for ICI efficacy. In this work, we utilized deep-learning (DL) models to extract TME features from digitized H&E slides and evaluated their predictive and prognostic role in patients with mNSCLC treated with Pembrolizumab. Methods: NSCLC patients (n=90) treated with single-agent 1st line pembrolizumab in two centers were identified. 47 patients from one center were used to train the model, and 43 patients from another center were used for validating the model. Pre-treatment H&E whole slide images (WSI) were analyzed using a deep-learning model to identify and classify tumor cells, TILs, tumor and stromal areas, and spatial features were calculated. Spatial features were correlated with clinical outcome data to train a binary classifier that identifies patients with a favorable clinical outcome. The resulting classifier combined three spatial features and three clinical features. The classifier was then applied to the validation set and differences in duration of treatment (DOT), and overall survival (OS) between patients with positive and negative scores were assessed. Results: The classifier identified patients in the validation set to have either positive (n=18) or negative (n=25) scores. Baseline patient characteristics and PDL1 score were similar between the positive and negative groups. In a Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, OS was significantly higher in patients with a positive score compared to patients with a negative score (HR=0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.98; p<0.05). Positive patients had a significantly higher median OS (NR vs.17.8m, p<0.05) and 2-year OS (70.8% vs. 33%, p=0.02) than negative patients. Median DOT was also higher in positive patients compared to negative patients (10.1m vs. 6.5m). Conclusions: Deep-learning models that analyze the TME from H&E whole-slide images can identify NSCLC patients with durable benefit on Pembrolizumab. Identifying NSCLC patients who are exceptionally sensitive to anti-PD-1 therapy as monotherapy may improve clinical decision making and spare patients the unnecessary adverse effects associated with the addition chemotherapy or another IO agent.
Results from a phase II study of eftilagimod alpha (soluble LAG-3 protein) and pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1 unselected metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Authors: Clay Timothy Dudley , Majem Margarita , Felip Enriqueta , Doger Bernard , Carcereny Costa Enric , Forster Martin , Krebs Matthew , Peguero Julio Antonio , Mueller Christian , Triebel Frederic 
Published: June 2021

9046 Background: Eftilagimod alpha (efti) is a soluble LAG-3 protein that binds to a subset of MHC class II molecules to mediate antigen presenting cell (APC) activation and CD8 T-cell activation. The stimulation of the dendritic cell network and subsequent T cell recruitment with efti may lead to stronger anti-tumor responses in combination than observed with pembrolizumab alone. We hereby report results of the 1st line non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) part of the phase II trial (NCT03625323). Methods: Patients (pts) with untreated, immunotherapy naïve, advanced NSCLC unselected for PD-L1 expression were recruited into part A. The study used a Simon's 2-stage design (17 pts planned for stage 1 and 19 pts for stage 2), with objective response rate (ORR) by iRECIST as the primary endpoint (EP). Secondary EPs include tolerability, disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), PK, PD and immunogenicity. Efti is administered as 30 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 wks for 8 cycles and then every 3 wks for 9 cycles with pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenous infusion every 3 wks for up to 2 yrs). Imaging was performed every 8 weeks locally and with blinded independent central review (BICR) retrospectively. The study was approved by ethic committees and institutional review boards. Results: In total 36 pts were enrolled. At data cut-off (Jan 2021; median FU of 14 months), the median age was 69 yrs (range 53-84) and 69 % were male. The ECOG PS 0 and 1 was 42% and 58% respectively. Patients had squamous (42%) and non-squamous (58%) NSCLC and 95% presented with metastatic disease. All PD-L1 subgroups (TPS < 1 %, ≥ 1 % to ≤49 %; ≥50 %) were represented with 36% pts having ≥50% TPS. Pts received a median of 7.0 (range 1 – 31) pembrolizumab and 11.5 (range 1-22) efti administrations. Responses as per BICR and local read are shown in the table. ORR (local, iRECIST) by different PD-L1 subgroups was 27% for pts with TPS<1%, 39 % for TPS ≥1 %and 54% for ≥50 % TPS. Median PFS (n=36) was 8.2 months while median OS was not yet reached. The most common (> 20 %) treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) were asthenia (47 %), cough (36 %), decreased appetite (36 %), dyspnea (32 %), pruritus (31 %), fatigue (28 %), diarrhea (25 %), anemia (25 %), constipation (25 %) and back pain (22%). Two patients discontinued treatment due to adverse reactions (Grade 4 immune-mediated hepatitis, Grade 3 AST+ALT increase). Conclusions: Efti in combination with pembrolizumab is safe and shows encouraging antitumor activity in 1st line advanced NSCLC patients across all PD-L1 (TPS) levels. Clinical trial information: NCT03625323. [Table: see text]
A phase II trial of chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-LUN15-029.
Authors: Shukla Nikhil , Althouse Sandra K. , Perkins Susan , Furqan Muhammad , Leal Ticiana , Hanna Nasser H. , Durm Greg Andrew 
Published: June 2021

9073 Background: Chemoimmunotherapy with a platinum doublet plus a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) is a standard of care for pts with advanced NSCLC. While some pts experience prolonged responses to initial CPI therapy, the majority of pts will eventually experience PD. It is unknown if continuing CPI treatment beyond progression has any advantages in this setting. We report the results of a phase 2 trial of chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in pts with advanced NSCLC previously treated with a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Methods: Pts experiencing PD after clinical benefit to CPI (PFS > 3 months) were enrolled. Pts received pembrolizumab 200 mg q3wks plus next-line chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV D1 and D8 q3wks, or docetaxel 60-75 mg/m2 IV D1 q3wks, or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV D1 q3wks [non-squamous histology only]). The primary endpoint was PFS by RECIST 1.1. Key secondary endpoints included ORR, OS, and toxicity. The null hypothesis was median 3-month PFS with pembrolizumab plus next-line chemotherapy and the alternative hypothesis was median 6-month PFS with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Results: 35 pts were enrolled. Median follow-up was 18.1 months and median age 63 (44-80). 51.4% male and 48.6% female. 82.9% were current or former smokers. Histology included 74.3% with adenocarcinoma, 20% with squamous cell carcinoma, 5.7% with NSCLC NOS. Treatment regimens included pembrolizumab/docetaxel (40%), pembrolizumab/gemcitabine (45.7%), or pembrolizumab/pemetrexed (14.3%). Median number of cycles of pembrolizumab was 6 (1-31). Median PFS using RECIST 1.1 and irRECIST was 5.2 months (95% CI 3.6-11.2, p < 0.05) and 6.9 months (95% CI 3.8-12), respectively. Median OS was 26.8 months (95% CI 13.4-30.9). Best response using RECIST 1.1 was PR (23.5%) and SD (53%). 45.7% of pts experienced G3 or higher treatment-related AEs (TRAEs). Most common TRAEs were fatigue (60%), anemia (51.4%), and nausea (42.9%). There were no treatment related deaths. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab plus next-line chemotherapy in pts with advanced NSCLC who experienced PD after clinical benefit to CPI was associated with prolonged PFS compared with historical controls of single agent chemotherapy. Further investigations into which pts would benefit from continued CPI treatment after progression is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03083808.