Association between coordination of long-term care insurance service and adverse outcome after discharge in older patients with heart failure
Authors: Tsunekawa Y , Adachi T , Kameyama T , Kobayashi K , Matsuoka A , Tanimura D 
Published: July 2021

Abstract

Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.

Introduction
Long-term care insurance (LTCI) has a key role in the disease management of older patients in Japan. However, clinical benefit of coordinating LTCI service during hospitalization has not been examined in patients with heart failure (HF).

Purpose
We aimed to examine the association between the coordination of LTCI service and adverse outcome after discharge in Japanese older patients with HF.

Methods
The inclusion criteria of this retrospective cohort study were patients aged ≥ 65 years hospitalised for HF who used any LTCI services after discharge. In Japan, people aged ≥ 65 who satisfy the eligibility criteria are eligible to receive LTCI services. Questionnaires regarding daily life and activities are used to assess eligibility and create the 7 certification levels: support required 1 or 2, and care levels 1 (least disabled) to 5 (most disabled). In this study, patients were divided into 1) patients without any change in LTCI service during hospitalisation (Group N), 2) patients with coordination of LTCI services during hospitalization (Group C), 3) patients who newly initiated LTCI service after discharge (Group I). The primary outcome was a composite of HF rehospitalisation and all-cause mortality. Survival rate was compared using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox proportional-hazards model adjusted for propensity score calculated based on age, gender, brain natriuretic peptide, β-blocker, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor /angiotensin II receptor blocker, need of any walking device or assistance at discharge, living alone, LTCI level.

Results
A total of 135 older patients were included (mean age 84 years, men 46%). During the median follow-up of 580 days, 43 events occurred. The number of patients for each group was as following: Group N, n = 91; Group C, n = 20; Group I, n = 24. The survival rates were significantly different among the three groups (log-rank test p = 0.039 , Figure 1). In Cox proportional-hazards model with Group N as a reference, Group C was associated with reduced risk of the study outcome (hazard ratio 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.91, p = 0.036). Group I also showed lower event rate but not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.30, p = 0.756). All the patients in Group C used visiting nurse service, whereas the implementation rates were 12.1% and 37.5% in Group N and Group I, respectively. Implementation rate of visiting rehabilitation was higher in Group C (20.0%) compared to Group N (1.1%) and Group I (4.2).

Conclusions
Patients with coordination of LTCI service during HF hospitalization showed reduced risk of adverse outcome after discharge, implying the clinical benefits of utilization of LTCI service. Further large-scale studies are needed to examine the optimal utilization of tailor-made LTCI service according to the patient’s condition.