Enhancing Surgical Confidence Using Point‐of‐Care Delivery of Anatomy for Dermatologic Surgeons
Authors: lachman Nirusha , Wyles Saranya , Pawlina Wojciech , Russell Mark A. 
Published: June 2021

While fundamental principles of anatomy are well‐established in early medical training, continued retention of anatomical knowledge is dependent on value, importability and relevance to surgical practice. As novel reconstructive strategies emerge, surgeons must account for individual patient factors and comorbidities in predicting patient outcome. Mastery of planning requires precise knowledge of local anatomy and reconstructive techniques, warranting reconnection with prior anatomic knowledge. Finding dedicated time to learn anatomy through self‐guided approach, is often challenging in a busy practice and CPD opportunities become a highly valued resource. In recent years, two mainstream professional dermatology societies have provided a platform for delivery of anatomy based clinical sessions. This study aims to assess value of point of care delivery of relevant anatomy and its role in improving perception of surgical confidence amongst procedural dermatologists in a CPD course. Assessment of core knowledge and knowledge gaps was conducted through the American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS). Objectives were designed by a team of anatomists and clinicians based on a series of challenging cases. Anatomy sessions were offered at a large general session (>300 participants) and a small group hands‐on flap based session (n=20) Key anatomic teaching points relating to danger zones, safe zones and functional impairment were highlighted. Videos of real‐time dissection using a layered approach of targeted anatomy were created and supplemented with 3D‐printed models. For challenging anatomy encountered during Mohs reconstruction, patient defects were re‐created on the cadaver highlighting pertinent anatomy. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducting using course review for general session and confidence rating using Likert scale of anatomy based objectives for small group session. While 60–90 minute general session was sufficient for anatomist‐clinician team to facilitate discussion, participants indicated strong desire for increased session time. Videos and high quality photography were seen as outstanding tools for demonstrating anatomy within surgical field. Participants strongly valued anatomist/clinician partnership and relevance of material to everyday practice. Session review data (n=78) indicated session objectives “improved their ability to provide excellent patient care by helping close practice gaps”( 89.74%), helped “identify practice gaps in knowledge, performance and outcomes” (83.33%) and material presented was relevant to their Mohs and dermatologic practice (100%). Within small group session (n=11), only 18% had access to anatomy facility and material, with 100% agreeing/strongly agreeing that anatomy education was critical to their current practice. Analysis of perceived confidence in anatomic knowledge post course showed significant improvement in confidence in identifying, isolating and visualizing relevant anatomical (p<0.05). Positive impact of collaborative teaching of anatomy outside a mainstream academic setting using targeted point of care delivery through the use of technology (video), products of technology (photography and 3D‐printed material) and patient based clinical discussion to improve physician confidence was demonstrated. In era of authentic learning, anatomists share a responsibility for bringing point‐of‐care content for improved patient care.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.