The role of the construction and sensitive volume of compact ionization chambers on the magnetic field‐dependent dose response
Authors: Delfs Björn , Blum Isabel , Tekin Tuba , Schönfeld Ann‐Britt , Kranzer Rafael , Poppinga Daniela , Giesen Ulrich , Langner Frank , Kapsch Ralf‐Peter , Poppe Björn , Looe Hui Khee 
Published: May 2021

PurposeThe magnetic‐field correction factors of compact air‐filled ionization chambers have been investigated experimentally and using Monte Carlo simulations up to 1.5 T. The role of the nonsensitive region within the air cavity and influence of the chamber construction on its dose response have been elucidated.Materials and MethodsThe PTW Semiflex 3D 31021, PinPoint 3D 31022, and Sun Nuclear Cooperation SNC125c chambers were studied. The factors were measured at the experimental facility of the German National Metrology Institute (PTB) up to 1.4 T using a 6 MV photon beam. The chambers were positioned with the chamber axis perpendicular to the beam axis (radial); and parallel to the beam axis (axial). In both cases, the magnetic field was directed perpendicular to both the beam axis and chamber axis. Additionally, the sensitive volumes of these chambers have been experimentally determined using a focused proton microbeam and finite element method. Beside the simulations of factors, detailed Monte Carlo technique has been applied to analyse the secondary electron fluence within the air cavity, that is, the number of secondary electrons and the average path length as a function of the magnetic field strength.ResultsA nonsensitive volume within the air cavity adjacent to the chamber stem for the PTW chambers has been identified from the microbeam measurements and FEM calculations. The dose response of the three investigated ionization chambers does not deviate by more than 4% from the field‐free case within the range of magnetic fields studied in this work for both the radial and axial orientations. The simulated for the fully guarded PTW chambers deviate by up to 6% if their sensitive volumes are not correctly considered during the simulations. After the implementation of the sensitive volume derived from the microbeam measurements, an agreement of better than 1% between the experimental and Monte Carlo factors for all three chambers can be achieved. Detailed analysis reveals that the stem of the PTW chambers could give rise to a shielding effect reducing the number of secondary electrons entering the air cavity in the presence of magnetic field. However, the magnetic field dependence of their path length within the air cavity is shown to be weaker than for the SNC125c chamber, where the length of the air cavity is larger than its diameter. For this chamber it is shown that the number of electrons and their path lengths in the cavity depend stronger on the magnetic field.Discussion and conclusionFor clinical measurements up to 1.5 T, the required corrections of the three chambers could be kept within 3% in both the investigated chamber orientations. The results reiterate the importance of considering the sensitive volume of fully guarded chambers, even for the investigated compact chambers, in the Monte Carlo simulations of chamber response in magnetic field. The resulting magnetic field‐dependent dose response has been demonstrated to depend on the chamber construction, such as the ratio between length and the diameter of the air cavity as well as the design of the chamber stem.