Precision Medicine Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease: Successful Proof-of-Concept Trial
Authors: Toups Kat , Hathaway Ann , Gordon Deborah , Chung Henrianna , Raji Cyrus , Boyd Alan , Hill Benjamin D. , Hausman-Cohen Sharon , Attarha Mouna , Chwa Won Jong , Jarrett Michael , Bredesen Dale E. 
Published: May 2021

AbstractImportanceEffective therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment are needed.ObjectiveTo determine whether a precision medicine approach to Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment, in which potential contributors to cognitive decline are identified and targeted therapeutically, is effective enough in a proof-of-concept trial to warrant a larger, randomized, controlled clinical trial.RationalePrevious clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease have pre-determined a single treatment modality, such as a drug candidate or therapeutic procedure, that may be unrelated to the primary drivers of the neurodegenerative process. Therefore, increasing data set size to include the potential contributors to cognitive decline for each patient, and addressing the identified potential contributors, may represent a more effective therapeutic strategy.HypothesisAlzheimer’s disease is a multi-factorial network dysfunction that results from a chronic or repeated insufficiency of support for a neuroplasticity network; thus factors that increase demand—such as infections or toxin exposure—or reduce support—such as reduced energetics or trophic support—may contribute to the neurodegenerative process. Rectifying this hypothesized network dysfunction represents a rational approach to the treatment of the cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment.DesignTwenty-five patients with Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment, with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores of 19 or higher, were evaluated for markers of inflammation, chronic infection, dysbiosis, insulin resistance, protein glycation, vascular disease, nocturnal hypoxemia, hormone insufficiency or dysregulation, nutrient deficiency, toxin or toxicant exposure (metals, organic toxicants, and biotoxins), genetic predisposition to cognitive decline, and other biochemical parameters associated with cognitive decline. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with volumetrics was performed at baseline and study conclusion. Patients were treated for nine months with a personalized, precision medicine protocol that addressed each patient’s identified potentially contributory factors, and cognition was assessed at t = 0, 3, 6, and 9 months.Trial registration and IRB approvalThe clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03883633),1 and approved by the Advarra IRB.Support for the trialThe trial was supported by a grant from the Four Winds Foundation via Evanthea, LLC, and we are grateful to Diana Merriam and Gayle Brown for their interest, discussions, and support.Main Outcome MeasuresTrained external raters evaluated the study subjects with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), CNS Vital Signs (a computerized cognitive assessment battery), AQ-21 (a subjective scale completed by the significant other or study partner), and AQ-C change scale (a subjective scale of cognitive improvement or decline, completed by the significant other or study partner). Follow-up brain MRI with volumetrics was carried out at the completion of the trial.ResultsAll outcome measures revealed improvement: statistically highly significant improvement in MoCA scores, CNS Vital Signs Neurocognitive Index, and AQ-C were documented. No serious adverse events were recorded.Conclusions and RelevanceBased on the cognitive improvements observed in this study of patients with Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment, a larger, randomized, controlled trial of the precision medicine therapeutic approach described herein is warranted.