bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Neoadjuvant therapy bridging patients with hepatocellular cancer waiting for liver transplant
Authors: Pitkevich A. A. , Kosyrev V. Yu. , Dzhanyan I. A. , Novruzbekov M. S. , Monakhov A. R. , Zubenko S. I. , Voskanyan S. E. , Rudakov V. S. , Moroz E. A. , Breder V. V. 
Published: December 2021

Introduction. Liver transplant (LT) is a widely accepted treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The role of neoadjuvant (NAT) is still under debate.The aim of the work is to assess the effect of NAT on relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC who underwent LT.Methods and materials. 63 patients diagnosed with HCC were observed at Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology from October 2010 to January 2020. Of these, 28 patients did not receive any type of treatment before transplantation, 35 patients received various types of NAT. Two groups had similar patient and tumour characteristics at baseline. A significant number of patients with decompensated cirrhosis were observed in the non-NAT group (n = 14; 50%), while no patients with CP-C liver cirrhosis were observed in the NAT group (n = 0; 0%; p = 0.000). The average wait for a liver transplant was 10.3 months in the NAT group and 6.8 months in the NAT-free group (p = 0.561).Results. In the bridging subgroup, the tumour progression was detected in 29% of patients, stable disease in 47% of patients, partial response was achieved in 14% of patients, complete tumour response was observed in 5%. For 5% of patients, it was not possible to estimate the effect of the therapy due to the lack of appropriate data archives. In the subgroup of downstaging therapy, the tumour progression was detected in 23% of patients, stable disease in 41% of patients, a partial response was achieved in 12% of patients, a complete tumour response was observed in 6%. The treatment allowed the Milan criteria to be fulfilled in 18% of patients.Conclusion. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between the NAT and control groups.
Immediate results of treatment of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma using isolated liver chemoperfusion. The first domestic experience
Authors: Kaprin A. D. , Unguryan V. M. , Petrov L. O. , Ivanov S. A. , Pobedintseva Yu. A. , Filimonov E. V. , Kruglov E. A. , Falaleeva N. A. , Nazarova V. V. , Orlova K. V. , Utyashev I. A. 
Published: December 2021

Introduction. Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular tumor in adults. Despite some achievements in primary tumor treatment, 50% of patients develop distant metastases in various times (3 years to decades). Hematogenous spread is typical for uveal melanoma, and in 90% of the cases liver is the target. Median survival of patients with liver metastases is 4 to 9 months according to various researchers. And the result of treatment is extremely poor, unlike the results of skin melanoma treatment.The aim is to evaluate the immediate results of treatment of patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver using isolated hepatic perfusion technique.Materials and methods. Considering a high risk of developing a metastatic liver disease in patients with uveal melanoma, local therapy is particularly interesting. This article describes the results of 10 metastatic uveal melanoma patients’ Isolated Hepatic Perfusion (IHP) Treatment. IHP was conducted using the standard methods with 100 mg of Melphalan for 60 min.Results and discussion. IHP treatment shows low complication rate. The data for response assessment is available on 9 out of 10 patients, because 10th patient received this treatment less than a month ago. Follow-ups a month after 9 patients underwent IHP showed an objective response to treatment in 6 patients (complete response in 1, partial response in 5 patients).Conclusion. The use of isolated liver chemoperfusion in a small group of patients according to the standard procedure allowed achieving an immediate response in 67% of cases.
Efficacy of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-refractory prostate cancer: authors’ experience
Authors: Ustinova T. V. , Bolotina L. V. , Paichadze A. A. , Kachmazov A. A. , Fedenko A. A. , Kaprin A. D. 
Published: December 2021

Prostate cancer is one of the most common neoplasms in men. It currently ranks second in Russian Federation amongst male population in overall number of cases after only lung cancer and third in cancer mortality. Prostate cancer is rarely diagnosed in patients younger than 40 years old, with overage age of diagnosis being between 50 and 70 years. A lot of different new treatment options were developed in the last decade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). Despite androgen-deprivation remaining the standard of therapy, it has been proven that the addition of cytotoxic and hormonal drugs of new generation improves overall survival of patients with castration-sensitive and castration-resistant metastatic disease. Recently, enzalutamide became the new standard of care not only in castration-resistant mPC, but also in the setting of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer, due to the data acquired in two large randomized trials ARCHES and ENZAMET. This article provides clinical examples demonstrating the effectiveness of enzalutamide in various forms of prostate cancer. In the first clinical case enzalutamide was used in the treatment of castration-sensitive mPC. Currently, patient continues to receive this therapy with progression-free interval exceeding 11 months. In the second clinical case, enzalutamide has shown its efficacy in the setting of castration-resistant PC. Stable disease was achieved and as of right now patient has shown no signs of progression for 9 months, which is already a significantly better result in comparison with previous lines of treatment.
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the possibility of targeted therapy. Case.
Authors: Menshikov K. V. , Izmailov A. A. , Sultanbaev A. V. , Musin Sh. I. , Chalov V. S. , Menshikova I. A. , Sultanbaeva N. I. , Lipatov D. O. 
Published: December 2021

Malignant neoplasms of the kidney are quite an urgent problem. In the Russian Federation in 2019, 20758 patients with a newly diagnosed renal cell carcinoma were registered; it should be noted that at the end of 2019, 177 755 patients with this diagnosis were registered. Clear cell carcinoma of the kidney is the most common (75–80%) and most studied subtype of renal cell carcinoma. Because renal cell carcinoma is resistant to chemotherapy, interleukin-2 or interferon alpha has previously been widely used as the first line of treatment for metastatic disease. Sunitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that includes the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and the platelet growth factor receptor (PDGFR). Two phase II studies of sunitinib as an anti-angiogenic agent have shown clinical efficacy in patients who progressed on cytokine therapy. Currently, in connection with the development of immuno-oncological drugs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are fading into the background. It should also be noted that immuno-oncological drugs have their own spectrum of contraindications and immune-mediated toxicity. A clinical case of treatment of a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the group with a favorable prognosis for IMDC and contraindications to immunotherapy is presented. A history of autoimmune thyroiditis, which was previously treated with levothyroxine sodium, contraindicated treatment with checkpoint inhibitors. The patient started therapy with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. Sunitinib therapy made it possible to achieve disease control for more than 4 years with satisfactory tolerance. The noted adverse events were stopped during therapy and did not lead to a reduction in doses of sunitinib and its cancellation.
Dual anti-HER2 blockade in late-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer
Authors: Frolova M. A. , Stenina M. B. 
Published: December 2021

In recent years, there has been a wide range of treatment options for patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, resulting in the highest life expectancy for these patients among all subtypes. The addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab and docetaxel has been shown to increase overall survival and is therefore recognized as the standard first-line treatment. The most optimal second-line treatment option is trastuzumab emtansine. In addition, various combinations of cytostatics and anti HER2 targeting agents can be used. The choice of treatment options in heavily pretreated patients is of great interest. If they have not previously received pertuzumab, is it worth to use it and which combination is the best? One possible option is the combination of eribulin with the dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Eribulin is an anti-microtubule agent that irreversibly blocks mitosis. In addition, it has non-mitotic effects – in vivo and in vitro experiments demonstrated its ability to restore normal tumor vascularization, reduce the area of hypoxia and, as a consequence, decrease tumor cells migration and invasion. This article represents a clinical case of the use of eribulin with double anti-HER2 blockade in the 6th line of treatment in a patient with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Long-term control of the disease (within 2 years) with a satisfactory quality of life has been demonstrated.
Clinical case of the treatment of metastatic luminal breast cancer
Authors: Nasretdinov A. F. , Sultanbaev A. V. , Menshikov K. V. , Musin Sh. I. , Sultanbaeva N. I. , Izmailov A. A. , Ayupov R. T. 
Published: December 2021

Hormone therapy currently open up the prospect of long-term, comfortable and relatively low-toxic treatment for patients with hormone receptor – positive advanced breast cancer. For a long time, the presence of visceral metastases prompted oncologists to abandon hormone therapy in favor of cytostatic agents. Now days, even in the presence of visceral metastases, clinical guidelines allow use of modern hormonal therapy in the absence of a visceral crisis. In particular, the so-called CDK 4/6 inhibitors, presented on the Russian market by drugs: palbociclib, ribociclib and abemacyclib, became the drugs that significantly improved the results of hormone therapy. Each of them has demonstrated its effectiveness in clinical trials; moreover, there are lots of clinical cases demonstrating the benefits of this therapy in real clinical practice. The article presents a clinical case of treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The effectiveness of treatment with CDK 4/6 inhibitors has been demonstrated, a comparatively analysed with the data obtained in the course of clinical trials. The analysis of the tactics of treatment of cytomegalovirus infection of the cornea during therapy with ribociclib was carried out.
Comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating drugs for the treatment of anemia in cancer patients
Authors: Krysanov I. S. , Makarova E. V. , Ermakova V. Yu. 
Published: December 2021

Introduction. Currently, a number of pharmacoeconomic studies describing use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) in cancer patients with anemia have been published, however, most of the publications on this topic are foreign. At the same time, there are practically no studies comparing the economic efficiency of various ESA preparations with each other. Some of works by foreign colleagues reflect that the clinical efficacy of using ESA namely the degree of increase in Hb, significantly depends on the patient’s body weight: the higher the weight, the greater the dose of EPO is required for a single administration and a course of therapy.Aim. Сomparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of epoetin alfa usage for the treatment of anemia in adult cancer patients with weight 80 kg.Materials and methods. The following drugs were selected for comparative analysis: epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin. Clinical efficacy was assessed in terms of the rate of in Hb level increase. Pharmacoeconomic analysis was carried out using the cost-effectiveness method (CEA).Results. Тhe usage of epoetin alfa 12,000 IU for 8 weeks therapy course in cancer patients weighting over 80 kg had a better cost-effectiveness ratio compared to epoetin alfa (10,000 IU, 30,000 IU, 40,000 IU) and darbepoetin, giving way in price only to the cheapest epoetin beta which can be administered 4 injections simultaneously. Its the infringement of patients rights to avoid additional pain. Its the infringement of patients rights to avoid additional pain. At the 16th week of therapy, the usage of epoetin alfa 12,000 IU had an advantage over all ESA.Conclusions. Тhe usage of russian epoetin alfa 12,000 IU for the treatment of anemia in adult cancer patients weighing over 80 kg approximately in real clinical practice in Russian Federation is an economically justified approach to the medical care organization.
Results of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy in patients with cancer
Authors: Lyadova M. A. , Lyadov V. K. , Pardabekova O. A. , Pokataev I. A. , Ivannikov M. E. , Koroleva Ya. V. , Chernysheva E. S. , Lyadov K. V. 
Published: December 2021

Introduction. The discovery of immune checkpoints and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) became a breakthrough in medical oncology. Currently a search for most effective and safe schemes of ICI therapy for different cancers is ongoing.Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in cancer patients in real-life clinical practice.Materials and methods. The study included 30 patients: 13 patients with melanoma, 10 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and 7 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). All patients underwent 4 courses of combined immune therapy (melanoma - nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 3 mg/kg; RCC, CRC – nivolumab 3 mg/kg + ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once per 21 days). Nivolumab monotherapy was continued after the achievement of disease control. Objective tumor response was registered in cases of partial or complete tumor regression. Treatment response was determined using iRECIST criteria.Results. Treatment effect assessment was performed in 91 patients. Complete response (CR) was registered in 1 (5%) patient, partial response (PR) – in 3 (16%) patients, disease stabilization – in 8 (42%) patients, unconfirmed progression – in 7 (37%) patients. No cases of disease progression were registered. Thus, objective response rate was 21%; disease control was achieved in 63% of patients. The most significant immune-mediated adverse effects (imAEs) were gastric toxicity (20%), 1–2 grade fatigue (13%) and 2–3 grade hepatotoxicity (10%).Conclusions. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy in patients with melanoma, CRC and RCC is associated with a high rate of disease control with acceptable toxicity profile.
Role of pre-metastatic niche in organ specificity of breast cancer metastasis. Influence on metastatic potential as a basis for CDK4/6-inhibition efficacy in early therapy of disseminated hormone-receptor-positive disease
Authors: Stukan A. I. , Goryainova A. Yu. , Lymar E. V. , Sharov S. V. , Andreev D. V. , Antipova V. V. 
Published: December 2021

Influencing the pre-metastatic niche is a very perspective cancer treatment strategy in order of preventing metastases formation. It was found that bone marrow progenitor cells and tumor cells secreting biological compounds are key components in the formation of the pre-metastatic niche. Myeloid suppressor cells (MSCs) are the main type of bone marrow cells in pre-metastatic niches. At the same time, tumor-associated chronic inflammation induces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines triggering myeloid cells differentiation into myeloid suppressor cells. When circulating tumor cells enter the circulatory channel, their interaction with immune cells is observed, which additionally influences the pre-metastatic site preparation. Studies have shown that the entire spectrum of immune cells is capable of influencing the metastasis formation by circulating tumor cells. The epithelialmesenchymal transition with the tumor cell transporting form appearence was found to be related to the function of the ZEB1 protein. Its activity is regulated by numerous signaling mechanisms at the transcriptional level, including TGFβ, Wnt and Notch. This initiates epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells. Zhang Z.et al. proved that CDK4/6 blocking leads ZEB1 protein stability decreasing, preventing metastasis in breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, USP51 deubiquitinase has been identified as a target of cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinases. At the molecular level, CDK4/6 phosphorylate and activates USP51, which then influences ZEB1 deubiquitination and stabilization. A positive correlation was demonstrated between the expression of p-RB (an indicator of CDK4/6 activity), p-USP51 and ZEB1 in breast cancer samples. Thus, the CDK4/6-USP51-ZEB1 axis may play a key role in the metastasis of breast cancer. In breast cancer cells, inhibition of CDK4/6 was shown to increase the expression of E-cadherin but decrease the expression of mesenchymal markers, reducing the migratory ability and invasiveness of breast cancer cell lines. This biological effect may also explain the clinical efficacy of the CDK4/6 inhibitor Abemaciclib in early-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer as well as in adjuvant combination hormone therapy for the prevention of metastatic lesions in patients at high risk of recurrence and progression in the MONARCH E study. Besides, there were no response predictors evaluated in trials investigating CDK4/6 in breast cancer treatment and it is unknown if there any differences in treatment response according to the metastatic site. The clinical cases demonstrate abemaciclib clinical efficacy in metastatic breast cancer treatment regardless of metastatic site.
Eribulin-trastuzumab combination in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from a Russian observational study
Authors: Kovalenko E. I. , Artamonova E. V. , Bolotina L. V. , Zhiliaeva L. A. , Ponomarenko D. M. , Karabina E. V. , Mukhametshina G. Z. , Khasanova A. I. , Ratner E. Yu. , Safarova A. R. , Manikhas A. G. , Popova N. O. , Evstigneeva I. V. , Vladimirova L. Yu. , Kramskaya L. V. , Karandeeva T. V. , Suslova I. R. , Romanchuk O. V. , Shikina V. E. , Povyshev A. Yu. , Osipov M. A. , Cherniakova E. M. , Dergunov A. S. , Volkonskiy M. V. , Chernov I. S. , Shumskaya I. E. , Fael M. M. , Garifullina V. I. , Gudkova I. E. 
Published: December 2021

Introduction. The standard of 1st line treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is double blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab + taxane, 2nd line – Trastuzumab-emtazine. There are no standards for further treatment, as well as the optimal drug sequence. Expansion of the arsenal of therapeutic possibilities and the use of new combinations will certainly improve the results of treatment of this category of patients and increase their life expectancy.Aim. We sought to describe treatment patterns of eribulin and clinical outcomes of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer treated with eribulin plus trastuzumab combination in academic institutions and community oncology practices across the Russian Federation.Materials and methods. Patients treated with eribulin anytime between Jan, 2014 and Sep, 2019 with a diagnosis of MBC were identified by 23 providers from Russia. Providers retrospectively reviewed the health records and abstracted selected data points into an electronic case report form for each eligible patient.Results. 100 HER2-positive pts received eribulin in combination with trastuzumab. Median age was 55 (31–80) yrs and ECOG status 0–3. 67% pts had visceral metastases. Eribulin was administered as 1st and 2nd line to 23 (23%) pts, 3rd line to 31 (31%) pts, 4th line and later to 46 (46%). Median number of cycles was 5 (2–27). ORR was 12%, SD – 72%, SD > 6 months – 23%, PD – 16%. Clinical efficacy rate achieved in 35%. Median PFS was 5.07 months (95% CI 4.021–6.119). According to the ER-status the response to eribulin and trastuzumab was different. ORR was 18.8%, SD 72.9% in pts with ER-positive MBC (n = 48) and 5.8% and 71.2% respectively in ER-negative MBC (n = 52). Median PFS was 6.97 months (95% CI 3.924–10.016) in pts with ER-positive MBC and 4.67 months (95% CI 3.841–5.499) in ER-negative MBC (р = 0.3). The combination was well tolerated: dose reductions were required in 12% pts, withdrawal due to toxicity in 4% pts. The most common type of toxicity was hematological with neutropenia Gr III-IV in 14 (14%) pts. Peripheral neuropathy Gr III was observed in 5 (5%) pts. No cardiotoxicity was detected.Conclusions. This is the real-life data of clinical outcomes for patients receiving eribulin plus trastuzumab for HER2-positive MBC throughout the Russian Federation. Our experience with eribulin plus trastuzumab demonstrates that this combination may be a potential effective treatment option for HER-2 positive MBC patients.
Optimal solutions in the third line therapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. CORRECTness and CONCURency
Authors: Ayupov R. T. , Izmailov A. A. , Menshikov K. V. , Sultanbaev A. V. , Nasretdinov A. F. , Rakhimov R. R. , Musin Sh. I. , Sultanbaeva N. I. 
Published: December 2021

Colon cancer therapy currently includes at least 3 cytostatic agents and 6 targeted drugs, combinations of which constitute many different treatment regimens. Nevertheless, as shown by various clinical studies, the use of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine regimens in conjunction with monoclonal targeted drugs remains the main one. After progression on the main lines of therapy and registration of refractory disease, there are not many standard options for treatment in the 3rd line that have statistical confidence in terms of improving survival rates. There have been attempts to search for genetic aberrations for targeted therapy, predictors of the effectiveness of immunotherapy, the use of re-introduction regimens (re-application of a regimen that the patient stopped taking due to intolerance phenomena) and re-challenge (use of previous regimens, with response at first time, and then developed progression), and the abundance of solutions could only be limited by the imagination of the researcher. However, with the advent of the new multi-kinase inhibitor regorafenib, recommendations for the treatment of colorectal cancer have changed. The drug has received indications for use in the third line of therapy for refractory colorectal cancer. A review of the existing options for targeted therapy and an analysis of studies of different regimens in the 3rd line of therapy in comparison with regorafenib was carried out. It has been established that regorafenib is currently the optimal option for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in the third line of therapy, regardless of previous lines of therapy and mutational status, and has a satisfactory spectrum of side effects, many of which may be predictors of therapy efficacy.