bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Survival outcomes, treatment toxicity, and healthcare utilization in older adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
Authors: Lavoie Mitchell W. , Yi Alisha , Nipp Ryan David , Horick Nora K. , Amonoo Hermioni L. , Newcomb Richard , Rice Julia , Reynolds Matthew J. , El-Jawahri Areej , Johnson Patrick Connor 
Published: June 2021

7557 Background: Aggressive NHLs frequently affect older adults, and are often treated with intensive systemic therapy that is potentially curative but can cause substantial toxicities. Although balancing treatment efficacy with the risk of complications is critically important for older adults with NHL, few studies have described these patients’ survival outcomes, rates of toxicities, and healthcare utilization. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adults > 65 years diagnosed with aggressive NHL and treated with systemic therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital from 4/2000-7/2020. We abstracted patient demographic and clinical information, survival outcomes, treatment toxicity (rates and grade), and healthcare utilization outcomes (intensive care unit [ICU] admissions and unplanned hospitalizations within six months of treatment initiation) from the electronic health record. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined patient and disease factors associated with rates of grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity and unplanned hospitalization. Results: Of 295 patients (median age = 73 years [age 65-69: 32.5%; age 70-74: 26.1%; age 75-79: 20.0%; age 80+: 21.4%], 39.0% female), most had advanced stage disease (59.5%) and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (83.1%). The most common diagnosis was de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or grade 3B follicular lymphoma (69.2%). Most common therapies were CHOP (65.8%) and EPOCH (17.0%) with or without Rituximab. With a median follow up of 5.9 years, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 74.2%. Among patients age 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, and 80+ years, 5-year OS by age group were 82.1%, 72.2%, 73.5%, and 66.3%, respectively. Overall, 42.4% had grade 3+ toxicity, while 8.1% had grade 4 or 5 toxicity. The rates of unplanned hospitalization and ICU admission during the first 6 months of therapy were 41.0% and 6.1%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, hypoalbuminemia (OR 4.22, 95%, p < 0.001) and number of comorbidities (OR 1.75, p < 0.001) were associated with a greater likelihood of grade 3+ toxicity. Hypoalbuminemia (OR 2.76, p = 0.003), number of comorbidities (OR 1.61, p = 0.001), and receipt of EPOCH (OR 5.41, p = 0.012) were associated with a greater likelihood of unplanned hospitalization. Conclusions: The majority of older adults receiving upfront therapy for aggressive NHL survive beyond 5 years, yet nearly half experience substantial treatment toxicities and unplanned hospitalizations. Our findings underscore the need to develop supportive care interventions to enhance the care experience for older adults with NHL.
Prognostic role of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in patients treated with CAR-T for aggressive lymphoma.
Authors: Zhang Henan , Bansal Radhika , Peterson Martinez Kodi , Hathcock Matthew , Shao Zuoyi , McCoy Gabriele , Gonzalez-Guerrico Anatilde , Bennani N. Nora , Paludo Jonas , Wang Yucai , Johnston Patrick , Ansell Stephen M. , Kenderian Saad , Porrata Luis F. , Villasboas Jose Caetano , Lin Yi 
Published: June 2021

7558 Background: A low absolute lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (ALC/AMC) has been found to predict decreased survival in lymphoma patients receiving chemotherapy and stem cell transplant. We report its clinical significance and additional cellular phenotype changes in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy. Methods: Records were reviewed for patients (pts) who received axicabtagene ciloleucel between 6/2016 and 12/2020. Receiver operator curve was generated using nominal logistic regression to predict CR as best response. Survivals were calculated using Kaplan- Meier method. Blood immune phenotype were assayed by multiparametric flow. Principle component analysis (PCA) was performed using ClusterVis. Results: Low ALC/AMC (≤0.8) prior to lymphodepletion (LD) chemotherapy on day -5 was associated with lower CR rate (AUC=0.68, Table). Our cohort of 81 pts had similar baseline characteristics except that noted in Table. Low ALC/AMC ratio is associated with shorter EFS and OS (EFS: 2.6 vs. 6.4 months, P<0.0001; OS: 5.3 months vs. not reached, P=0.0006), respectively. Prognostic association remained significant in multivariate analysis including ASCT, bridging therapy and CRP. Interestingly, compared to the high ALC/AMC group, the low ALC/AMC group had decreased CD8 Tem, increased CD16+CCR2+ monocytes and increased monocytes’ producing IL12, IL-10, and IL-1β (n=26). Unsupervised PCA identified 3 clusters: 1. Low ALC/AMC, all non-CR; 2. High ALC/AMC, some non-CR; 3. High ALC/AMC, all CR. Compared to cluster 1 and 2, cluster 3 had increased CD4 Tnaive, CD8 Tcm and IL-17 producing CD4 T and NK cells. Conclusions: ALC/AMC is a clinically accessible test that is strongly associated with CAR-T response and survival. Immune characterization revealed that the biologic effect is not just associated with cell ratio. Increased inflammation has been found to negatively impact CAR-T response, with some cytokines known to be from the myeloid lineage. We show that CRP is elevated in the low ALC/AMC group with increased cytokine production by monocytes. In addition, presence of T cell subset and IL-17 producing cells, before LD, are associated with clinical response. Further investigation on optimizing host immunity may help improve clinical outcome with CAR-T.[Table: see text]
High-dose lenalidomide and melphalan as conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Authors: Rossi Adriana C. , Monge Jorge , Niesvizky Ruben , Hsu Jing Mei , Shore Tsiporah , Van Besien Koen , Pearse Roger , Mark Tomer , Jayabalan David , Mayer Sebastian Alexander 
Published: June 2021

8021 Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a standard of care of eligible patients with multiple myeloma, despite the many novel therapies introduced over the past decade. High dose melphalan (HDM) is the only approved regimen to date. Lenalidomide (LEN) is an oral immunomodulatory drug which has become the backbone of myeloma therapy from induction through salvage and maintenance. Early studies noted a dose response relationship, and found myelosuppression to be the dose limiting toxicity. We previously reported on our phase 1 study of high dose lenalidomide (HDLEN) with HDM in conditioning for ASCT, where no DLT was noted up to 350mg PO daily of LEN. Here we report the phase 2 data of patients undergoing ASCT with combination conditioning regimen. Methods: 50 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) underwent ASCT using HDLEN+HDM conditioning. HDLEN was dosed at 350mg PO daily from day -5 to day -1 and HDM was dosed 100mg/m2 on days -2 and -1. TPatients were heavily pre-treated: 32% had prior HDM-ASCT, 96% had received prior lenalidomide, and 42% prior pomalidomide; 40% prior anti-CD38 mAB. Of note, 68% entered the study with progressive disease at time of enrollment. Results: Overall response rate was 96%, with 80% being ≥VGPR. Median progression free survival (PFS) was noted at 14.3 months, while overall survival (OS) was 68.2 months. PFS was similar when patients were stratified by prior ASCT, depth of response at enrollment, or presence of high risk FISH. Toxicities were mostly hematologic (100% neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 90% anemia), GI (88% diarrhea, 72% nausea, 42% vomiting) and metabolic (30-96% derangement in electrolytes), and similar to historical controls receiving HDM alone. Second malignancies were noted in 2 patients. Conclusions: HDLEN/HDM is a well tolerated and effective conditioning regimen for ASCT in patients with RRMM. This regimen merits further investigation as ASCT is likely to remain an integral part of the treatment of RRMM patients, yet few advancements have been made to this modality. HDLEN may be particularly useful in patients with high risk disease and those progressing after multiple lines of therapy. HDLEN added little toxicity to HDM and SPMs were not more frequent than expected per SEER database for patients in this age range. Clinical trial information: NCT01054196. [Table: see text]
Personalized, ctDNA analysis to detect minimal residual disease and identify patients at high risk of relapse with multiple myeloma.
Authors: Dhakal Binod , Sharma Shruti , Shchegrova Svetlana , Maninder Minu , Malhotra Meenakshi , Sethi Himanshu , Zimmermann Bernhard , Billings Paul R. , Aleshin Alexey , Hari Parameswaran 
Published: June 2021

8029 Background: Despite treatment with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (AHCT), MM patients invariably relapse. MRD-negativity post-AHCT has emerged as the most important prognostic marker. Currently, MRD in MM is monitored via bone marrow aspirate sampling. Marrow MRD assays are limited by the spatial heterogeneity of marrow MM localization; extramedullary disease and sampling variability of marrow aspiration. Sensitive, non-invasive blood-based MRD assay is an unmet need. ctDNA as a noninvasive biomarker can be utilized to predict relapse in MM. Here we attempt to evaluate MRD using ctDNA in AHCT recipients with MM. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we analyzed ctDNA MRD in blood samples collected from 28 patients with MM after upfront AHCT. A total of 80 plasma timepoints were available pre and post AHCT with a median follow-up of 92.4 months. Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) at 10-4 level was used to assess the MRD from the BM biopsy. Individual bone marrow aspirates or FFPE slides from the time of MM diagnosis and matched normal blood were whole-exome sequenced, and somatic mutations were identified. MRD assessment at 3 months post-AHCT was performed by ctDNA analysis using a personalized, tumor-informed (SignateraTM, bespoke mPCR NGS assay). The prognostic value of ctDNA was evaluated by correlating MRD status with clinical outcomes. Results: Table provides the baseline disease characteristics. Median age was 67 [41-75] years and 16 [57.1%] were males. ctDNA was detectable in 70.8% (17/24) of pre-AHCT, 53.6% (15/28) of ̃3 months post-AHCT, and 39.2% (11/28) of patients during the surveillance phase post-AHCT. Of the 15 ctDNA MRD positive patients, 93.3% (n=14) experienced relapse on follow-up (hazard ratio: 5.64; 95% CI: 1.8-17; p=0.0003). Patients negative for ctDNA at 3 months post-AHCT had significantly superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to positive (median PFS, 84 months vs. 31 months; p=0.003) The positive predictive value (PPV) for relapse among patients positive for ctDNA at 3 months post-AHCT was 93.3%, and significantly higher than marrow MFC of 68.4%. Conclusions: Our study shows the feasibility that a tumor-informed assay on archival blood samples is predictive of relapse post-AHCT. Future prospective studies with real-time marrow NGS and ctDNA samples are needed to define the role of ctDNA in MM and its prognostic significance.[Table: see text]
Cilta-cel versus conventional treatment in patients with relapse/refractory multiple myeloma.
Authors: Costa Luciano J. , Lin Yi , Martin Thomas G. , Chhabra Saurabh , Usmani Saad Zafar , Jagannath Sundar , Callander Natalie Scott , Berdeja Jesus G. , Kang Yubin , Vij Ravi , Tian Hong , Valluri Satish , Marino Jennifer , Jackson Carolyn Chang , Banerjee Arnob , Kansagra Ankit , Schecter Jordan Mark , Kumar Shaji , Hari Parameswaran 
Published: June 2021

8030 Background: CARTITUDE-1 is a single arm study of Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; JNJ-68284528) anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy in US patients (pts) with relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM) refractory to both IMiD and proteasome inhibitor (PI) or with at least 3 prior lines of therapy and previously exposed to anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (MoAb). While recently reported efficacy results of cilta-cel were encouraging, it is unknown how they compare with similar pts receiving conventional (non CAR-T) treatment. Methods: We utilized a contemporary US-based dataset of pts with MM refractory to anti-CD38 MoAb (MAMMOTH) to identify pts who would meet eligibility for CARTITUDE-1 and who received conventional therapy. We analyzed the intent-to-treat population (ITT) in CARTITUDE-1, defined as pts who underwent apheresis (N=113) and a modified ITT population (mITT) defined as subset of pts who received cilta-cel at the RP2D (N=97). From the MAMMOTH dataset, we identified a population corresponding to CARTITUDE-1 ITT (N=190) and a mITT population, pts without death or progression within 47 days (median time between apheresis and cilta-cel infusion) from onset of therapy (N=122). We calculated propensity scores (PS) with demographics, N of prior therapies, cytogenetics and refractoriness to MM agents as covariates. An analyst blinded to outcomes performed nearest neighbor 1:1 PS matching. We analyzed overall response rate (ORR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for ITT and mITT in CARTITUDE-1 vs matching MAMMOTH cohorts. Results: Ninety-five ITT (75 received bridging therapy, 82 received cilta-cel) and 69 mITT (54 received bridging) CARTITUDE-1 pts matched MAMMOTH pts (Table). Among the pts in the MAMMOTH ITT cohort 34% received pomalidomide, 24% anti-CD38 MoAb, 19% carfilzomib and 35% cytotoxic chemotherapy in next therapy. ORR in the ITT cohorts was higher in CARTITUDE-1 (84% vs. 28%). Compared to their MAMMOTH counterparts, pts in CARTITUDE-1 ITT cohort had improved PFS (12 mo. 73% vs. 12%) and OS (12 mo. 83% vs 39%). Between the mITT cohorts, CARTITUDE-1 pts had superior ORR (96% vs. 30%), PFS (12 mo 79% vs. 15%) and OS (12 mo. 88% vs. 41%). Conclusions: In pts with RRMM beyond therapy with IMID, PI, and anti-CD38 MoAb, treatment with cilta-cel is associated with higher response rate and superior PFS and OS when compared to conventional treatment.[Table: see text]
Daratumumab (DARA) maintenance therapy following DARA + cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) induction therapy in multiple myeloma (MM): End-of-study analysis of LYRA.
Authors: Rifkin Robert M. , Melear Jason M. , Faber Edward , Bensinger William I. , Burke John M. , Narang Mohit , Stevens Don A. , Gray Kathleen , Lutska Yana , Bobba Padma , Qi Keqin , Qi Ming , Lin Thomas S. , Yimer Habte Aragaw 
Published: June 2021

8035 Background: LYRA is a community practice-based, phase 2, single-arm study (NCT02951819) evaluating DARA + CyBorD as an immunomodulatory drug-sparing regimen in MM. The primary analysis demonstrated the safety and efficacy of DARA + CyBorD in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and relapsed MM (RMM), and an update showed that DARA maintenance therapy deepened responses. We present the final end-of-study analysis of LYRA. Methods: US pts aged ≥18 years with MM per IMWG criteria and ≤1 prior line of therapy received 4-8 induction cycles of DARA + CyBorD (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 PO weekly [QW]; bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 SC on Days [D] 1, 8, and 15; dexamethasone 40 mg PO or IV QW every 28 days; DARA IV 8 mg/kg on D1 and D2 of cycle [C]1, 16 mg/kg QW C1D8-C2, 16 mg/kg Q2W C3-6, and 16 mg/kg Q4W C7-8). After induction, eligible pts could receive autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Pts received up to 12 maintenance cycles with DARA 16 mg/kg IV Q4W and were followed for up to 36 months after induction. Results: In total, 101 (NDMM, n = 87; RMM, n = 14) pts were enrolled; 36% of pts had high-risk cytogenetics. NDMM and RMM pts received a median of 6 and 8 induction cycles, respectively. Among NDMM pts, 44.8% (39/87) underwent ASCT and 72.4% (63/87) completed 12 months of maintenance. Rates of ≥VGPR and ≥CR were 82.1% and 48.7% in NDMM pts who underwent ASCT, and 70.2% and 29.8% in NDMM pts who did not (Table). With a median follow-up of 35.7 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached for NDMM pts. Estimated 36-month PFS rates were 69.3% and 72.6% for NDMM pts who did and did not receive ASCT, respectively; estimated 36-month OS rates were 94.9% and 84.3% (Table). Among RMM pts, 7.1% (1/14) underwent ASCT and 50.0% (7/14) completed 12 months of maintenance; efficacy outcomes are shown in the Table. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 62.0% of all pts, with the most common (≥10%) being neutropenia (14.0%). Serious TEAEs occurred in 33.0% of pts, the most common being pneumonia (4.0%) and pulmonary embolism (3.0%). TEAEs led to death in 2.0% of pts, all unrelated to study treatment. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 56.0% of pts; the majority were mild (4.0% of pts had grade 3/4 events). Conclusions: DARA used for induction with CyBorD and maintenance as monotherapy resulted in durable, deep responses in pts with NDMM or RMM, with a 3-year PFS rate of 70% in NDMM irrespective of ASCT status. With longer follow-up, no new safety concerns were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT02951819. [Table: see text]
Prognostic impact of depth of response in Waldenström macroglobulinemia patients treated with fixed duration chemoimmunotherapy.
Authors: Perera Nirosha D. , Abeykoon Jithma P. , Castillo Jorge J. , Gustine Joshua , Varettoni Marzia , Tedeschi Alessandra , Cavalloni Chiara , Frustaci Anna Maria , Maurer Matthew J. , Kapoor Prashant , Habermann Thomas Matthew , Witzig Thomas E. , Kyle Robert A. , Gertz Morie A. , Treon Steven P. , Ansell Stephen M. , Paludo Jonas 
Published: June 2021

8049 Background: The treatment paradigm of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) continues to evolve as new therapies expand our options for this indolent and incurable disease. While more profound responses are generally associated with longer treatment-free intervals, the impact of depth of response from fixed duration therapy in WM patients' survival needs further evaluation. In this international, multicenter cohort study, we report the prognostic impact of depth of response in WM. Methods: 319 WM patients treated with frontline fixed duration therapy [Dexamethasone/Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (DRC), Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR), or Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Rituximab (BDR)] were included. Response at the completion of therapy (6 months) was used in a landmark analysis for progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) (defined as time from 6 months post treatment response to event or censor). Response was defined by modified IWWM-6 criteria. Associations between clinical variables and outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional-hazard models. Results: The median age at the time of treatment initiation was 64 years (range: 29-94), 59% were men, and risk category by International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)-WM was low (n=67, 23%), intermediate (n=83, 29%), and high-risk (n=141, 48%). Evaluable responses at 6 months from frontline therapy [DRC (n=105; 41%), BR (n=83; 32%), BDR (n=68; 27%)] were available in 256 patients and included in the landmark analysis. Median follow-up was 63 months (95% CI: 59-70). The rate of major response (PR or better) at 6 months was 74% for the entire cohort. Five-year PFS rates from completion of therapy for patients who attained major response vs. those who did not were 71% and 43%, respectively (p<0.001). Five-year TTNT rates for patients who attained major response vs. not were 84% and 54%, respectively (p<0.001). Five-year OS rates for patients who attained major response vs. not were 92% and 77%, respectively (p<0.001). In multivariable analyses including other WM prognostic factors evaluated at initiation of frontline therapy, attaining a major response at 6 months was associated with superior PFS (HR 0.33, p<0.001), TTNT (HR 0.23, p<0.001), and OS (HR 0.31, p=0.001–Table). Conclusions: Achieving a major response at 6 months after frontline chemoimmunotherapy emerges as a significant prognostic factor for PFS, TTNT and OS in patients with WM.[Table: see text]
A randomized phase II trial of oral vinorelbine as second-line therapy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Authors: Fennell Dean Anthony , Casbard Angela Claire , Porter Catharine , Rudd Robin , Lester Jason Francis , Nicolson Marianne , Morgan Bruno , Steele Jeremy Peter , Darlison Liz , Gardner Georgina Mary , Nixon Lisette Sheena , Kitson Terri , White Ann , Griffiths Gareth Owen , Poile Charlotte , Gaba Aarti , Busacca Sara , Richards Catherine Jane ,   VIM Trial Group
Published: June 2021

8507 Background: All patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) eventually relapse following standard chemotherapy. However, there is no standard treatment option in this setting. Vinorelbine, exhibits useful clinical activity but has not been formally evaluated in a randomised clinical trial, despite its widespread off-label use worldwide. BRCA1 regulates spindle assembly checkpoint in MPM and predicts vinorelbine sensitivity in preclinical models [1,2], suggesting that BRCA1 negative patients may be chemoresistant. Methods: VIM, a Cancer Research UK funded, investigator-initiated randomised controlled phase 2 multi-centre UK trial, enrolled patients with MPM who had progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Pts were randomised 2:1 to either vinorelbine (60mg/m2 weekly Q21d escalating to 80mg/m2 from cycle 2) + active supportive care (ASC) versus ASC until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS) defined as the time from randomisation to any progression (based on Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma) or death. The trial had 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.65 at the one-sided 20% significance level. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), tolerability and safety. Results: Between May 2016 and Oct 2018, 154 patients were recruited from 10 UK sites and randomised to vinorelbine + ASC (n=98) or ASC alone (n=56). In the Intention-to-treat analysis, after 129 events, median PFS was 4.2 months (m) for vinorelbine + ASC compared to 2.8m for ASC alone (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.85; one-sided p = 0.0017). 108 deaths were reported. Median OS was 9.3m for vinorelbine + ASC compared to 9.1m for ASC alone (HR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.17; two-sided p = 0.24). Toxicity data and subgroup analyses including the impact of BRCA1 deficiency will be presented. Conclusion: The trial met its primary endpoint. Vinorelbine demonstrates useful clinical efficacy in relapsed MPM, supporting its off-label use, as a treatment option for patients with relapsed MPM.[1] Busacca et al, J Pathol 2012, 227(2), 200. [2] Busacca et al, Mol Cancer Res, 2021, 20(2) 379. Clinical trial information: NCT02139904.