P–233 The spatial arrangement of blastomeres and time of cavitation forming as predictors of blastocyst quality
Authors: Sayme N , Krebs T , Kasoha M , Maas D H A , Solomayer E F , Kljajic M 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Study question
Does the spatial arrangement of blastomeres and the start of blastulation affect blastocyst quality?

Summary answer
Better blastocyst quality is associated with the spatial arrangement of the embryo and the shorter time frame of blastulation (cavitation).

What is known already
The ability to select the human embryo with the highest implantation potential remains one of the greatest challenges in the management of In Vitro Fertilization patients. Several publications have proposed that additional morphological evaluations of blastomere arrangement and the dynamics of late-stage embryonic divisions might be a useful non-invasive way for embryo selection. In the last decade, the introduction of time-lapse technology enables continuous monitoring of embryo development, which leads to better outcomes than a selection based on the traditional morphology assessment.

Study design, size, duration
The spatial arrangement was defined as tetrahedrally if the cleavage planes were perpendicularly orientated, while embryos with rather parallelly orientated cleavage axes were considered as non-tetrahedral embryos. The injection time of ICSI was designated as “time zero” (t0), and EmbryoViewer software was used to calculate the time duration between injection and start of blastulation (cavitation). Obtained results were later correlated with the embryo’s capability to form a blastocyst as well as with blastocyst quality.

Participants/materials, setting, methods
A total of 195 oocytes from 40 patients undergoing the antagonist cycle for ICSI treatment were evaluated. All blastocysts were cultured in Embryoscope™ according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Vitrolife, Sweden). The Gardner and Schoolcraft scoring system was used to describe blastocyst quality. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 24. Data were reported as median and range. Differences between groups were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was defined as p &lt; 0.05.

Main results and the role of chance
Obtained data showed that 83.6% (61/73) of embryos with tetrahedral arrangement formed blastocysts compared to 42.4% (50/116) of embryos with the non-tetrahedral arrangement (p &lt; 0,001). Moreover, tetrahedral embryos more frequently formed good quality blastocyst compare to the non-tetrahedral [59% (36/61) vs 18 (9/50)% respectively; p &lt; 0,001]. In addition, we found that good quality blastocyst had a significantly shorter time frame between injection and blastulation start, compared with blastocysts which did not reach good quality [95.00h (84–118) vs 102h (77–121) respectively; p = 0,006].

Limitations, reasons for caution
The limitation of the present study was that due to the double-embryo transfer correlation between those morphokinetic parameters and pregnancy rate can not be calculated. Further research should link these morphokinetic parameters with pregnancy rate and live birth rate as well.
Wider implications of the findings: The potential of our findings is considerable, especially for countries with strict Embryo Law Regulation. Obtained results might be highly useful for selecting embryos with high implantation potential. In addition, the present work illustrates the possibility of additional information that can potentially be incorporated into an embryo classification model.

Trial registration number
Not applicable