Specific T Cell Receptor Gene Repertoire Profiles in Subgroups of CLL Patients with Distinct Genomic Aberrations
Authors: Vlachonikola Elisavet , Sofou Electra , Gkoliou Glykeria , Pechlivanis Nikos , Karakatsoulis Georgios , Jeromin Sabine , Stavroyianni Niki , Ranghetti Pamela , Scarfo Lydia , Österholm-Corbascio Cecilia , Mansouri Larry , Anagnostopoulos Achilles , Ghia Paolo , Haferlach Claudia , Rosenquist Richard , Psomopoulos Fotis , Stamatopoulos Kostas , Baliakas Panagiotis , Chatzidimitriou Anastasia 
Published: November 2021

Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) B cells engage in multifaceted bi-directional interactions with bystander cells, including T cells. Immunogenetic studies in CLL revealed clonal expansions of T cells and shared T cell clonotypes between different patients, strongly implying clonal selection by antigens. Although the exact nature of these antigens remains largely elusive, evidence exists that the clonotypic B cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) may serve as a source of antigenic epitopes for T cells. That said, recurrent genomic aberrations associated with distinct abnormal expression profiles could represent an alternative, non mutually exclusive, source of potent immunogenic onco-antigens that might shape the T cell repertoire in CLL. On these grounds, here we interrogated the T cell receptor (TR) gene repertoire of CLL patients with different genomic aberration profiles with the aim to identify unique signatures that would allude to distinct antigen selection pressures. The study group included 46 patients with CLL, sampled before treatment initiation, who were categorized in 5 subgroups defined by a unique genomic aberration, as follows: +12, n=18; del(11q), n=10; del(13q), n=7; del(17p)/TP53mut, n=6; NOTCH1mut, n=5. Confounding effects of multiple aberrations have been minimized, as we previously established through comprehensive characterization (including FISH, SNP arrays and gene panels) that the analyzed patients carried only one of the above aberrations. Starting material was RNA extracted from blood mononuclear cells. TRBV-TRBD-TRBJ gene rearrangements were RT-PCR amplified and subjected to paired-end next generation sequencing (NGS). Raw NGS reads (n=13,213,563| median: 294,757/sample) were processed through a purpose-built bioinformatics pipeline. Only productive rearrangements (n=9,249,546 | median=199,184/sample) were taken into consideration for the computation of clonotypes i.e. TRB rearrangements with identical TRBV gene usage and amino acid complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) sequence. Overall, 513,984 distinct clonotypes (median=10,304 clonotypes/sample) were assessed. The main measure of clonality employed in this study was the median cumulative frequency of the 10 most expanded T cell clonotypes/sample (MCF-10). For comparisons of the clonality profiles, a group of 17 aged-matched healthy individuals were used as controls. All patients displayed oligoclonal T cell expansions with the following MCF-10 values: del(11q): 21.6%, +12: 25%, del(13q): 20.6%, NOTCH1mut: 9.1%, del(17p)/TP53mut: 12.9%; the difference between the del(11q) and +12 groups versus the NOTCH1mut group was statistically significant (p&lt;0.05). The MCF-10 value of the control group was estimated at 17.5%, supporting the notion of age-related decrease in TR repertoire diversity. However, the del(11q), +12 and del(13q) CLL groups displayed elevated clonality, reaching statistical significance (p&lt;0.002) in the case of +12. TRBV gene repertoire analysis revealed that the TRBV12-3 gene predominated in most groups, except for the del(17p)/TP53mut, where the predominant gene was TRBV10-3. Clonotype comparisons disclosed the presence of shared TR clonotypes both within a particular group but also between groups. Overall, 446/513,984 clonotypes were found to be shared by at least two patients across all groups; the vast majority (392/446, 88%) of shared clonotypes appeared to be CLL-biased since they did not match entries in public databases of TR clonotypes from various contexts. Subgroup-specific clonotypes were identified for all aberrations examined; these emerged as unique to the particular subgroups, as revealed by extensive comparisons against both public databases but also a large TR clonotype database from CLL available to us from our previous studies. In conclusion, recurrent genomic aberrations, especially large chromosomal abnormalities, display an oligoclonal TR gene repertoire. The distinct immunogenetic profile of each group examined here and, most importantly, the existence of subgroup-specific clonotypes, suggest that abnormal protein expression and gene dosage effects likely represent a relevant source of CLL-specific selecting antigens.

Disclosures
Scarfo: Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Anagnostopoulos: Abbvie: Other: clinical trials; Sanofi: Other: clinical trials ; Ocopeptides: Other: clinical trials ; GSK: Other: clinical trials; Incyte: Other: clinical trials ; Takeda: Other: clinical trials ; Amgen: Other: clinical trials ; Janssen: Other: clinical trials; novartis: Other: clinical trials; Celgene: Other: clinical trials; Roche: Other: clinical trials; Astellas: Other: clinical trials . Ghia: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ArQule/MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Juno/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding. Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Other: Part ownership. Rosenquist: Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Illumina: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Stamatopoulos: Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Baliakas: Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Chatzidimitriou: Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding.