bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Likelihood of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Individuals Living With Psoriatic Disease: Results From a Large Real-World Survey
Authors: Gondo George C. , Noe Megan H. , Bell Stacie J. , Ritchlin Christopher T. 
Published: December 2021

Introduction: Development and dissemination of novel COVID-19 vaccines represent an opportunity to end the COVID-19 pandemic by vaccinating an estimated 80% of the population. Objectives: This study examines perceptions, and demographic and clinical factors influencing the likelihood of adults with psoriasis receiving a novel COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: A cross sectional study conducted from October–November 2020 of 1405 adults with psoriatic disease with prior contact to a patient advocacy organization. The main outcome of interest was the likelihood of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Chi-square tests and logistic regression examined the relationship between individual characteristics and likelihood of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Results: Most participants (65%) received a flu vaccination in the last 12 months and were (64.2%) likely to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, while 35.9% reported being unlikely receive a vaccine. Likelihood of COVID-19 vaccination was associated with receiving the flu vaccine, race, ethnicity, sex, BMI, age, income, severity of PsO and PsA. When controlling for ethnicity, race, male sex, overweight/obese status, age, biologic use, disease type, comorbidities linked with worse COVID-19 outcomes, PsA symptoms, and skin disease severity, individuals who received the flu vaccine and those with annual household income over $75,000 were most likely to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusions: Vaccine hesitancy among individuals with psoriatic disease is considerable. Dermatologists and rheumatologists can increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake by actively engaging their patients on this topic using guidance published by the National Psoriasis Foundation on the management of psoriatic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.
TKI discontinuation in CML: how do we make more patients eligible? How do we increase the chances of a successful treatment-free remission?
Authors: Hochhaus Andreas , Ernst Thomas 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
Treatment-free remission (TFR) is a new and significant goal of chronic myeloid leukemia management. TFR should be considered for patients in stable deep molecular response (DMR) after careful discussion in the shared decision-making process. Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) improve the speed of response and the incidence of DMR. Treatment may be changed to a more active TKI to improve the depth of response in selected patients who have not reached DMR. Stem cell persistence is associated with active immune surveillance and activation of BCR-ABL1-independent pathways, eg, STAT3, JAK1/2, and BCL2. Ongoing studies aim to prove the efficacy of maintenance therapies targeting these pathways after TKI discontinuation.
Lifelong TKI therapy: how to manage cardiovascular and other risks
Authors: Mauro Michael J. 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
Beginning with imatinib and now spanning 6 oral, highly active, and mostly safe agents, the development of specific targeted therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has created a new world featuring chronic maintenance chemotherapy for all treated as such, treatment-free remission, and functional cure after prolonged deep remission in a subset. As a result comes a necessary shift in focus from acute to chronic toxicity, increasing attention to patient comorbidities, and critical thinking around specific adverse events such as metabolic, cardiovascular, and cardiopulmonary effects, which vary from agent to agent. This review aims to pull together the state of the art of managing the “C” in CML—a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm treated at present over many years with oral BCR-ABL-targeted agents in a population whose overall health can be complex and potentially affected by disease and therapy—and determine how we can better manage a highly treatable and increasingly curable cancer.
Hematopoietic cell transplantation for sickle cell disease: updates and future directions
Authors: Krishnamurti Lakshmanan 
Published: December 2021

AbstractExcellent outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from HLA-identical siblings, improvements in conditioning regimens, novel graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, and the availability of alternative donors have all contributed to the increased applicability and acceptability of HCT for sickle cell disease (SCD). In young children with symptomatic SCD with an available HLA-identical related donor, HCT should be carefully considered. HCT from alternative donors is typically undertaken only in patients with severe symptoms, causing or likely to cause organ damage, and in the context of clinical trials. Patients undergoing HCT for SCD require careful counseling and preparation. They require careful monitoring of unique organ toxicities and complications during HCT. Patients must be prospectively followed for a prolonged time to determine the long-term outcomes and late effects of HCT for SCD. Thus, there is a need for a universal, longitudinal clinical registry to follow patients after HCT for SCD in conjunction with individuals who do not receive HCT to compare outcomes. Antibody-based conditioning and ex-vivo umbilical cord blood expansion are likely to improve the availability and acceptability of HCT. In addition, new disease-modifying drugs and the emerging option of the autologous transplantation of gene-modified hematopoietic progenitor cells are likely to expand the available therapeutic options and make decision-making by patients, physicians, and caregivers even more complicated. Future efforts must also focus on determining the impact of socioeconomic status on access to and outcomes of HCT and the long-term impact of HCT on patients, families, and society.
Factor-mimetic and rebalancing therapies in hemophilia A and B: the end of factor concentrates?
Authors: Ellsworth Patrick , Ma Alice 
Published: December 2021

AbstractHemophilia A (HA) and B are inherited bleeding disorders caused by a deficiency of factor VIII or factor IX, respectively. The current standard of care is the administration of recombinant or purified factor. However, this treatment strategy still results in a high economic and personal burden to patients, which is further exacerbated by the development of inhibitors—alloantibodies to factor. The treatment landscape is changing, with nonfactor therapeutics playing an increasing role in what we consider to be the standard of care. Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that mimics the function of factor VIIIa, is the first such nonfactor therapy to gain US Food and Drug Administration approval and is rapidly changing the paradigm for HA treatment. Other therapies on the horizon seek to target anticoagulant proteins in the coagulation cascade, thus “rebalancing” a hemorrhagic tendency by introducing a thrombotic tendency. This intricate hemostatic balancing act promises great things for patients in need of more treatment options, but are these other therapies going to replace factor therapy? In light of the many challenges facing these therapies, should they be viewed as a replacement of our current standard of care? This review discusses the background, rationale, and potential of nonfactor therapies as well as the anticipated pitfalls and limitations. This is done in the context of a review of our current understanding of the many aspects of the coagulation system.
Hemophilia gene therapy: ushering in a new treatment paradigm?
Authors: George Lindsey A. 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
After 3 decades of clinical trials, repeated proof-of-concept success has now been demonstrated in hemophilia A and B gene therapy. Current clinical hemophilia gene therapy efforts are largely focused on the use of systemically administered recombinant adeno-associated viral (rAAV) vectors for F8 or F9 gene addition. With multiple ongoing trials, including licensing studies in hemophilia A and B, many are cautiously optimistic that the first AAV vectors will obtain regulatory approval within approximately 1 year. While supported optimism suggests that the goal of gene therapy to alter the paradigm of hemophilia care may soon be realized, a number of outstanding questions have emerged from clinical trial that are in need of answers to harness the full potential of gene therapy for hemophilia patients. This article reviews the use of AAV vector gene addition approaches for hemophilia A and B, focusing specifically on information to review in the process of obtaining informed consent for hemophilia patients prior to clinical trial enrollment or administering a licensed AAV vector.
Minimizing cardiac toxicity in children with acute myeloid leukemia
Authors: Narayan Hari K. , Getz Kelly D. , Leger Kasey J. 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
Anthracycline chemotherapy remains an integral component of modern pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) regimens and is often delivered at high doses to maximize cancer survival. Unfortunately, high-dose anthracyclines are associated with a significant risk of cardiotoxicity, which may result in early and/or long-term left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure. Moreover, the development of cardiotoxicity during pediatric AML therapy is associated with lower event-free and overall survival, which may be partially attributable to incomplete anthracycline delivery. A combined strategy of primary cardioprotection and close cardiac monitoring can maximize chemotherapy delivery while reducing the toxicity of intensive AML therapy. Primary cardioprotection using dexrazoxane reduces short-term cardiotoxicity without compromising cancer survival. Liposomal anthracycline formulations, which are under active investigation, have the potential to mitigate cardiotoxicity while also improving antitumor efficacy. Primary cardioprotective strategies may reduce but not eliminate the risk of cardiotoxicity; therefore, close cardiac monitoring is also needed. Standard cardiac monitoring consists of serial echocardiographic assessments for left ventricular ejection fraction decline. Global longitudinal strain has prognostic utility in cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity and may be used as an adjunct assessment. Additional cardioprotective measures should be considered in response to significant cardiotoxicity; these include cardiac remodeling medications to support cardiac recovery and anthracycline dose interruption and/or regimen modifications. However, the withholding of anthracyclines should be limited to avoid compromising cancer survival. A careful approach to cardioprotection during AML therapy is critical to maximize the efficacy of leukemia treatment while minimizing the short- and long-term risks of cardiotoxicity.
Managing therapy-associated neurotoxicity in children with ALL
Authors: Bhojwani Deepa , Bansal Ravi , Wayne Alan S. 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
Several chemotherapeutic agents and novel immunotherapies provide excellent control of systemic and central nervous system (CNS) leukemia but can be highly neurotoxic. The manifestations of subacute methotrexate neurotoxicity are diverse and require vigilant management; nonetheless, symptoms are transient in almost all patients. As methotrexate is a crucial drug to prevent CNS relapse, it is important to aim to resume it after full neurologic recovery. Most children tolerate methotrexate rechallenge without significant delays or prophylactic medications. Neurotoxicity is more frequent with newer immunotherapies such as CD19– chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cells and blinatumomab. A uniform grading system for immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and algorithms for management based on severity have been developed. Low-grade ICANS usually resolves within a few days with supportive measures, but severe ICANS requires multispecialty care in the intensive care unit for life-threatening seizures and cerebral edema. Pharmacologic interventions include anticonvulsants for seizure control and glucocorticoids to reduce neuroinflammation. Anticytokine therapies targeted to the pathophysiology of ICANS are in development. By using illustrative patient cases, we discuss the management of neurotoxicity from methotrexate, CAR T cells, and blinatumomab in this review.
Novel therapies vs hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: who, when, how?
Authors: England James , Gupta Vikas 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
Myelofibrosis is one of the classical Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative neoplasms characterized by progressive marrow failure and chronic inflammation. Discovery of the JAK2 mutation paved the way for development of small molecular inhibitors and further facilitated the research in understanding of molecular biology of the disease. Development of novel medications and synergistic combinations with standard JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy may have the potential to improve depth and duration of disease control and symptomatic benefit, whereas advancements in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) have improved tolerability and donor availability, allowing for more patients to pursue this potentially curative therapy. The increase in options for medical therapy and changing risk profile of HCT is leading to increased complexity in counseling patients on choice of management strategy. In this case-based review, we summarize our approach to symptom-directed medical therapy, including the use of novel drugs and combination therapies currently under study in advanced clinical trials. We outline our recommendations for optimal timing of HCT, including risk-adapted selection for early HCT as opposed to delayed HCT after upfront JAKi therapy, as well as the use of pretransplant JAKi and alternative donor sources.
Understanding neutropenia secondary to intrinsic or iatrogenic immune dysregulation
Authors: Walkovich Kelly , Connelly James A. 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
As a key member of the innate and adaptive immune response, neutrophils provide insights into the hematopoietic and inflammatory manifestations of inborn errors of immunity (IEI) and the consequences of immunotherapy. The facile recognition of IEI presenting with neutropenia provides an avenue for hematologists to facilitate early diagnosis and expedite biologically rationale care. Moreover, enhancing the understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving neutropenia in IEI—decreased bone marrow reserves, diminished egress from the bone marrow, and decreased survival—offers an opportunity to further dissect the pathophysiology driving neutropenia secondary to iatrogenic immune dysregulation, eg, immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.
Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: cutting through the practice variation
Authors: Skeith Leslie 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
There is clinical practice variation in the area of prevention and management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy. There are limited data and differing recommendations across major clinical practice guidelines, especially relating to the role of postpartum low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for patients with mild inherited thrombophilia and those with pregnancy-related VTE risk factors. This chapter explores the issues of practice variation and related data for postpartum VTE prevention. Controversial topics of VTE management in pregnancy are also reviewed and include LMWH dosing and the role of anti-Xa level monitoring, as well as peripartum anticoagulation management around labor and delivery.
What to use to treat AML: the role of emerging therapies
Authors: Thol Felicitas 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
The development and approval of novel substances have resulted in substantial improvements in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the current era of novel treatment options, genetic and molecular testing at the time of diagnosis and relapse becomes increasingly relevant. Midostaurin in combination with intensive chemotherapy is the standard of care as upfront therapy in younger AML patients with mutated fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3). Gilteritinib, a second- generation FLT3 inhibitor, represents a key drug for relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated AML patients. Targeted therapy has also been developed for patients with mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ivosidenib as a monotherapy for newly diagnosed older adult IDH1-mutated patients and enasidenib for R/R IDH2-mutated AML patients. CPX-351, a liposomal formulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine, has become an important upfront treatment strategy for fit patients with therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes that are generally challenging to treat. The antibody drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin was approved in combination with intensive therapy for patients with newly diagnosed (FDA/European Medicines Agency [EMA]) as well as R/R CD33+ AML. The combination of venetoclax, an oral selective B-cell leukemia/lymphoma-2 inhibitor, with hypomethylating agents or low-dose AraC (LDAC) has changed the treatment landscape and prognosis for older adult patients very favorably. The addition of glasdegib, a small-molecule hedgehog inhibitor, to LDAC is another example of novel options in older patients. Further substances have shown promising results in early clinical trials.
How do we optimally utilize factor concentrates in persons with hemophilia?
Authors: Lim Ming Y. 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
The current mainstay of therapy for hemophilia is to replace the deficient clotting factor with the intravenous administration of exogenous clotting factor concentrates. Prophylaxis factor replacement therapy is now considered the standard of care in both pediatric and adult patients with hemophilia with a severe phenotype to protect musculoskeletal health and improve quality of life. Heterogeneity in bleeding presentation among patients with hemophilia due to genetic, environmental, and treatment-related factors has been well described. Accordingly, the World Federation of Hemophilia recommends an individualized prophylaxis regimen that considers the factors mentioned above to meet the clinical needs of the patient, which can vary over time. This review focuses on the practical points of choosing the type of factor concentrate, dose, and interval while evaluating appropriate target trough factor levels and bleeding triggers such as level of physical activity and joint status. We also discuss the use of a pharmacokinetics assessment and its incorporation in the clinic for a tailored approach toward individualized management. Overall, adopting an individualized prophylaxis regimen leads to an optimal utilization of factor concentrates with maximum efficacy and minimum waste.
Does MRD have a role in the management of iNHL?
Authors: Giudice Ilaria Del , Starza Irene Della , Foà Robin 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
Among indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs), the analysis of measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD) has been extensively applied to follicular lymphoma (FL). Treatment combinations have deeply changed over the years, as well as the techniques to measure MRD, which is currently evaluated only in the setting of clinical trials. Here, we discuss the evidence on the role of molecular monitoring in the management of FL. Mature data support the quantification of molecular tumor burden at diagnosis as a tool to stratify patients in risk categories and of MRD evaluation at the end of treatment to predict progression-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, MRD deserves further studies as a tool to refine the clinical/metabolic response and to modulate treatment intensity/duration. Patients with a higher relapse probability can be identified, but the relevance of continuous molecular follow-up should be clarified by kinetic models of MRD analysis. Being the BCL2/heavy chain immunoglobulin gene hybrid rearrangement detectable in about 50% to 60% of advanced FL and in 30% of positron emission tomography/computed tomography–staged localized FL, technical advancements such as next-generation sequencing/target locus amplification may allow broadening the FL population carrying a molecular marker. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction can better quantify MRD at low levels, and novel sources of DNA, such as cell-free DNA, may represent a noninvasive tool to monitor MRD. Finally, MRD in other iNHLs, such as lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia and marginal zone lymphoma, is beginning to be explored.
Transthoracic lung biopsy for pulmonary nodules ≤20 mm in routine clinical care
Authors: Lissavalid Emilie , Khalil Antoine , Soussi Ghassen , Debray Marie-Pierre , Guyard Alice , Bunel Vincent , Borie Raphael , Mordant Pierre , Cazes Aurélie , Zalcman Gérard , Gounant Valérie 
Published: December 2021

BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) screening has improved lung cancer survival, yet increasingly detects small lung lesions. Thus, the number of transthoracic lung biopsies (TTLB) for small nodules is expected to rise significantly. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided TTLB for nodules ≤20 mmversusnodules >20 mm.Study design and methodsData for CT-guided TTLBs from 474 consecutive patients were prospectively collected over a 3-year period (198 lesions ≤20 mm and 276 lesions >20 mm) in a teaching hospital and analysed in terms of diagnostic performance and complications.ResultsThere were more conclusive biopsies in the >20 mm lesion group (n=236, 85.5%) than in ≤20 mm lesion group (n=140, 70.7%; p<0.001). The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value for diagnosing malignant lesions after first TTLB were 88.4%, 84%, 100% and 70.1%, respectively, for ≤20 mm lesions, and 94.2%, 93%, 100% and 74.6%, respectively, for >20 mm lesions. Pneumothorax requiring drainage was significantly more common for ≤20 mm lesions, compared to TTLB of larger lesions (9.6%versus4.3%; p=0.02). Prolonged hospital stay due to pneumothorax occurred in 27 (17.4%) TTLBs of ≤20 mm lesions and 15 (7%) TTLBs of >20 mm lesions (p=0.002). There were no deaths. The only variable significantly associated with diagnostic failure in the ≤20 mm lesion group was the radiologist's experience.InterpretationTTLBs for lesions ≤20 mm were associated with slightly lower diagnostic performance, whereas the higher rate of major complications was still inferior to that extrapolated from United States insurance databases.