bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Dietary intervention influence on physical activity in the Women’s Health Initiative randomized Dietary Modification trial.
Authors: Pan Kathy , Aragaki Aaron K. , Michael Yvonne , Thomson Cynthia A. , Shadyab Aladdin H. , Snetselaar Linda , Wactawski-Wende Jean , Garcia David O. , Saquib Nazmus , Chlebowski Rowan T. 
Published: June 2021

10511 Background: In the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Dietary Modification (DM) randomized trial, after 8.5 years dietary intervention and 19.5 years cumulative (median) follow-up, dietary intervention participation was associated with a statistically significantly 22% lower breast cancer mortality (P = 0.02). In observational studies, physical activity has been associated with lower breast cancer risk with emerging results now indicating, compared to inactivity, any increase in physical activity has health benefits. Currently, longitudinal data on whether an intervention targeting dietary change influences other health-related behaviors as a gateway effect is limited. To evaluate whether randomization to a dietary intervention was associated with self-directed change in physical activity. Methods: In the WHI DM trial, 48,835 postmenopausal women, ages 50-79 years, with no prior breast cancer and baseline normal mammogram were randomized at 40 US clinical centers to a dietary intervention (19,541) or a comparison group. Dietary goals were to reduce fat intake to 20% of energy and increase intake of vegetable, fruit, and grains addressed in 18 group sessions in year 1 then quarterly. Neither randomization group received specific or ongoing instructions to increase physical activity, but physical activity was referenced in written materials given to the intervention groups in 7 of the 56 sessions. Episodes per week of moderate or vigorous recreational physical activity (MVPA) were collected at baseline and serially through 15.9 years follow-up by self-report questionnaire. Marginal longitudinal logistic regression models were used to assess physically inactive (MVPA = 0) or physically active (MVPA > 0) participants by randomization group. Marginal Poisson regression models estimated mean weekly MVPA by randomization group. Results: 45.6% of participants reported 0 MVPA at baseline which largely persisted throughout follow-up. During cumulative follow-up, relative to the comparison group, dietary intervention group participation was associated with 7% lower physical inactivity rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.93 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91, 0.95, P < 0.001) and a 4% higher mean MVPA (ratio of means [RM] 1.04 95% CI 1.02, 1.06, P < 0.001). The association between dietary intervention participation with higher physical activity level was stronger with increasing BMI (P-interaction 0.01) and for women with waist circumference ≥ 88 cm (P-interaction 0.02). Conclusions: In conclusion, in a randomized trial setting, a low-fat dietary pattern intervention was associated with a significantly lower physical inactivity rate and significantly higher moderate and vigorous physical activity level which could be associated with health benefits. Clinical trial information: NCT00000611 .
The impact of socioeconomic status on stage at presentation, receipt of diagnostic imaging, receipt of treatment, and overall survival in colorectal cancer patients.
Authors: Shah Rajan , Chan Kelvin K. 
Published: June 2021

10565 Background: Socioeconomic factors have been identified to influence patterns of care in colorectal cancer yet current literature findings are sparse, conflicting, and often incomplete. As such, this study investigates the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on stage at presentation, receipt of diagnostic imaging, receipt of treatment, and overall survival (OS) in a universal healthcare system. Methods: The Ontario Cancer Registry was accessed to identify a cohort of patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma from 2007-2016 in Ontario, Canada. Linkage to administrative datasets allowed study of the impact of SES, measured by mean neighbourhood household income divided into quintiles (Q1-Q5; Q1 = lowest income), on stage, imaging, treatments, and OS. Multivariable regression analyses of all endpoints were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, and rurality with OS models also adjusting for imaging and treatment. Results: 39,802 colon and 13,164 rectal patients were identified. Lower SES patients were more likely to present at a higher stage in both cohorts. Lower SES colon patients were less likely to receive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen, liver resection, adjuvant oxaliplatin, and all palliative systemic therapies studied. In rectal patients, lower SES was associated with decreased receipt of MRI pelvis, rectal cancer resection in early stages, adjuvant oxaliplatin, and most palliative chemotherapies studied. All OS models found that lower SES was associated with poorer OS. Conclusions: These findings suggest disparities across the continuum of cancer care persist even within a universal healthcare system. Further efforts should be directed towards temporal research, identifying barriers, and subsequently applying this information to actionable policies.
Outcomes for hospitalized cancer patients with COVID-19 during the height of pandemic in New York City.
Authors: Sawyers Amelia , Chou Margaret , Johannet Paul , Gulati Nicholas , Qian Yingzhi , Zhong Hua , Osman Iman 
Published: June 2021

10572 Background: Several reports have suggested that cancer patients are at increased risk for contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and suffering worse coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. However, little is known about the impact of cancer status on presentation and outcome. Here, we report on the association between cancer status and survival in hospitalized patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the height of pandemic in New York City. Methods: Of the 6,724 patients who were hospitalized at NYU Langone Health (3/16/20 - 7/31/20) and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 580 had either active cancer (n = 221) or a history of cancer (n = 359). Patients were classified as having active malignancy if they either received treatment within six months of their COVID-19 diagnosis or they had measurable disease documented at the time of their hospitalization. Patients were categorized as having a history of cancer if there was no evidence of measurable disease or there were no treatments administered within six months of their COVID-19 diagnosis. We compared the baseline clinicodemographic characteristics and hospital courses of the two groups, and the relationship between cancer status and the rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), use of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and all-cause mortality. Results: There was no differences between the two groups in their baseline laboratory results associated with COVID-19 infection, incidence of venous thromboembolism, or incidence of severe COVID-19. Active cancer status was not associated with the rate of ICU admission ( P = 0.307) or use of IMV ( P = 0.236), but was significantly associated with worse all-cause mortality in both univariate and multivariate analysis with ORs of 1.48 (95% CI: 1.04-2.09; P = 0.028) and 1.71 (95% CI: 1.12-2.63; P = 0.014), respectively. Conclusions: Active cancer patients had worse survival outcomes compared to patients with a history of cancer despite similar COVID-19 disease characteristics in the two groups. Our data suggest that cancer care should continue with minimal interruptions during the pandemic to bring about response and remission as soon as possible. Additionally, these findings support the growing body of evidence that malignancy portends worse COVID-19 prognosis, and demonstrate that the risk may even apply to those without active disease.
The global burden of 29 cancer groups from 2010 to 2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2019.
Authors: Kocarnik Jonathan M , Compton Kelly , Dean Franny , Fu Weijia , Gaw Brian , Harvey James , Henrikson Hannah , Lu Dan , Pennini Alyssa , Xu Rixing , Lisa Force 
Published: June 2021

10577 Background: Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and global efforts to reduce health loss from cancer require systematic estimates that can measure progress from national to global levels. As part of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019 (GBD 2019), we examined global cancer burden in order to highlight areas where cancer burden is inequitably distributed and to inform cancer control efforts around the world. Methods: Using estimation methods from GBD 2019, we analyzed the incidence, mortality, years lived with disability, years of life lost (YLLs), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 29 cancer groups and 204 countries and territories from 2010 to 2019. Cancer burden was compared to health burden from other categories of diseases and injuries in the GBD. Results were assessed globally and by socio-demographic index (SDI), a summary measure of income per capita, average educational attainment, and total fertility rate. Point estimates and 95% Uncertainty Intervals (UIs) are reported. Results: There were 23.6 million (95% UI 22.2-24.9 million) incident cancer cases globally in 2019 (17.2 [15.9-18.5] million excluding non-melanoma skin cancer), and 10.0 (9.36-10.6) million cancer deaths. There were 250 (235-264) million DALYs globally due to cancer, 97% of which came from years of life lost. The leading five cancers by DALYs in 2019 were: tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer (45.9 [42.3-49.3] million); colon and rectum cancer (24.3 [22.6-25.7] million); stomach cancer (22.2 [20.3-24.1] million); breast cancer (20.6 [19.0-22.2] million; and liver cancer (12.5 [11.4-13.7] million). Compared to other diseases and injuries in the GBD, cancer was responsible for the second-highest number of deaths, YLLs, and DALYs globally in 2019. These rankings of cancer burden differed by SDI quintile: cancer was the leading cause of absolute DALYs in high SDI countries but was ranked 10th in low SDI countries. From 2010-2019, the number of global cancer cases increased by 26.3% (20.3-32.3%), deaths by 20.9% (14.2-27.6%), and DALYs by 16.0% (9.29-22.8%). The largest annualized rate of change in absolute cases and deaths over this period occurred in the low and low-middle SDI quintiles. Conclusions: Cancer cases and deaths are growing globally, with the largest relative growth over the last decade occurring in low to middle SDI countries. Improvements in cancer prevention efforts and ensuring access to timely diagnosis and care will be necessary to make equitable progress in reducing the global burden of cancer.
Germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes among women with invasive lobular cancer of breast.
Authors: Yadav Siddhartha , Hu Chunling , Domchek Susan M. , Weitzel Jeffrey N. , Goldgar David , Kraft Peter , Nathanson Katherine L. , Karam Rachid , Chao Elizabeth , Yussuf Amal , Pesaran Tina , Dolinsky Jill S. , Hart Steven , LaDuca Holly , Polley Eric , Couch Fergus ,   The CARRIERS Consortium
Published: June 2021

10581 Background: The prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer predisposition genes among women with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) and the risk of ILC in PV carriers is not well-defined. Methods: The study included 2,999 women with ILC and 32,544 unaffected controls from a population-based cohort; 3,796 women with ILC and 20,323 women with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) undergoing clinical multigene panel testing (clinical cohort); and 125,748 exome sequences from unrelated women without a cancer diagnosis in the gnomAD 3.0 dataset. Frequencies of germline PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) were compared between women with ILC and unaffected controls in both cohorts and between women with ILC and IDC in the clinical cohort. Results: The frequency of PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes among women with ILC was 6.5% in the clinical cohort and 5.2% in the population-based cohort. In case-control analyses, CDH1 and BRCA2 PVs were associated with high risks of ILC (Odds ratio (OR) > 4), and CHEK2, ATM and PALB2 PVs were associated with moderate (OR = 2-4) risks. BRCA1 PVs and CHEK2 p.Ile157Thr were not associated with clinically relevant risks (OR < 2) of ILC. PV frequencies in these genes in ILC and IDC were similar except for PV frequencies in BRCA1 and CDH1. Conclusions: The study establishes that PVs in ATM, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2 and PALB2 are associated with an increased risk of ILC, whereas BRCA1 PVs are not. The similar overall PV frequencies for ILC and IDC suggest that cancer histology should not influence the decision to proceed with genetic testing. While, multigene panel testing may be appropriate for women with ILC, CDH1 should be specifically discussed in the context of low prevalence and attendant gastric cancer risk.
Oncologists’ (ONCs) perceptions of tumor genomic profiling (TGP) and barriers to communicating secondary hereditary risk to African American (AA) patients.
Authors: Hall Michael J. , Bass Sarah Bauerle , Chertock Yana , Brajuha Jesse A , D'Avanzo Paul 
Published: June 2021

10592 Background: TGP identifies targets for precision cancer treatments. TGP may also identify secondary hereditary cancer risks, necessitating complex decision support during informed consent. ONCs are poorly trained in the communication of genetic information, particularly for patients with low health literacy, poor knowledge of genetics, and high medical mistrust. AA patients are especially vulnerable in this setting. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 ONCs to assess perceived barriers related to communication of secondary hereditary risks of TGP, probing barriers unique to AA patients. Informed by results, an Internet-based survey was developed/distributed to a convenience sample of 50 ONCs nationwide to assess TGP knowledge, genomics confidence, and perceptions related to communication of secondary hereditary risk. Results: Six themes emerged from interviews: risk/benefits of TGP, knowledge of genetics, discussing hereditary risk, value/harm of TGP, unique risks in AA, and training needs. Most ONCs felt uncomfortable discussing hereditary risks of TGP w/patients. Seven out of 10 identified socio-economic status, medical mistrust, discrimination, genetic counseling non-compliance, low health literacy and family relationships as factors important to consider with AA patients. Online survey participants were 52% White, 66% male, with median age of 42 years. Education in the interpretation/communication of TGP was largely informal (56% reported only informal training) and 46% reported perceived gaps in their education. Genomic confidence was associated w/higher use of TGP (p = 0.05), but was not associated w/knowledge or years in practice; however, low knowledge was associated w/more perceived barriers to TGP and w/negative attitudes toward the value of TGP and the challenge of communication of possible hereditary risks (p = 0.05). Early-career ONCs were more likely to endorse perceived barriers to communication of genetic risk information from TGP to AA patients. Overall 86% ONCs felt additional online training in communication of secondary hereditary risks of TGP would be useful. Conclusions: ONCs recognize unique needs and barriers for AAs related to communication of secondary hereditary genetic information from TGP. Many feel uncertain about how/whether to address barriers and recognize the need to improve their skillset to do so. Training is critical to ensure informed decision making in vulnerable populations.
Impact of race on biomarker testing among HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts) in the United States: Results from a real-world study.
Authors: Mahtani Reshma L. , Niyazov Alexander , Lewis Katie , Massey Lucy , Rider Alex , Arondekar Bhakti , Lux Michael P 
Published: June 2021

10598 Background: African Americans (AA) have the highest breast cancer (BC) mortality rate. Access to treatment is a known contributing factor. In the past 4 years, several targeted therapies for HER2- BC have become available which require testing for specific biomarkers. This study assessed the impact of race on biomarker testing rates in HER2- ABC pts receiving treatment in the US. Methods: Oncologists were recruited to abstract data from medical charts for the next 8-10 pts receiving treatment with HER2- ABC during Sept 2019-Apr 2020. Pts records were stratified by race and categorized into 3 mutually exclusive cohorts [White/Caucasian (White), AA, Other]. The other race cohort was excluded from this analysis due to small sample size. Differences in pt demographics/clinical characteristics were analyzed via Fisher’s exact tests. Testing rates for actionable biomarkers (i.e. BRCA1/2, PIK3CA, PD-L1) were compared between White and AA pts utilizing logistic regressions controlling for age, known family history of a BRCA-related cancer, hormone receptor (HR) status and practice setting (academic vs. community). Further analyses by age will be presented. Results: This analysis included 378 pts records, provided by 40 oncologists. Mean age was 64 years; 77% had HR+/HER2- ABC; 20% had advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), 3% had ABC with an unknown HR status. Compared to White pts, AA pts were significantly more likely to have advanced TNBC (27% vs. 18%, p<0.05). Compared to White pts, AA pts had significantly lower BRCA1/2 mutation (mut) testing rates (Table). Numerically lower rates of PIK3CAmut and PD-L1 testing were observed among AA pts (Table). BRCA1/2mut positivity rate (germline [g] and/or somatic [s]) was higher among AA vs. White pts (30% vs. 22%). Positivity rate for PIK3CAmut was lower for AA vs. White pts (8% vs. 11%). Conclusions: A higher than expected BRCA1/2mut positivity rate was observed than previously reported in the literature. This is likely because this analysis included s BRCA1/2mut and represented a high risk pt population. Across all biomarkers assessed, AA pts had lower testing rates than White pts. This suggests racial disparities in testing rates of actionable biomarkers. Consistent with guidelines, and with the increased availability of targeted therapies, focused efforts should be developed to increase biomarker testing in AA pts. Funding: Pfizer Biomarker Testing Rates by Race.[Table: see text]
Metastasectomy versus radiation of secondary sites in stage IV breast cancer.
Authors: Bilani Nadeem , Elson Leah , Elimimian Elizabeth Blessing , Liang Hong , Saravia Diana , Nahleh Zeina A. 
Published: June 2021

1094 Background: Prospective trials have yielded mixed results on the utility of surgery in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Thus far, however, studies have focused primarily on the impact of lumpectomy or mastectomy. We previously showed that a combined approach involving resection of primary and secondary sites (i.e. ‘metastasectomy’) in patients with limited mBC was associated with improved overall survival (OS). We sought to evaluate the effect on OS of two approaches to loco-regional therapy (LRT) at secondary sites: metastasectomy versus radiation therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with mBC from 2010-2017 using the National Cancer Database. We identified 5 cohorts of patients by site of metastasis: mBC involving only 1) bone, 2) brain, 3) liver, or 4) lung; and 5) patients with metastasis involving >1 site. For each cohort, we used Kaplan-Meier (KM) models with log-rank testing to evaluate differences in OS, by the LRT approach at secondary sites (radiation versus metastasectomy). Prior to KM modeling, chi-squared statistics were used in each cohort to assess whether age, race, Charlson/Deyo score (CDS) for comorbidity, and receptor subtype were potential confounders of survival. The KM models were adjusted accordingly, as per the table below. Results: 53.4%) were between 50-70 years old, White (n=53,409, 78.9%), and had hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2 receptor-negative breast cancer. N=12,362 patients received radiation therapy at either the bone, brain, liver, or lung; while n=2674 underwent surgical resection of a metastatic site. Of patients with metastasis to 1 site (n=44,451), n=30,341(68.3%) involved the bone, n=1,119 (2.5%) involved the brain, n=5,227 (11.8%) involved the liver, and n=7,764 (17.5%) involved the lung. N=24,017 patients had metastatic disease involving > 1 site. KM modeling revealed superior OS of patients undergoing metastasectomy versus radiation of secondary sites in all 5 cohorts (p<0.05). The difference in median OS (ΔmOS) by LRT approach was more pronounced when metastasis involved only the liver (41.6 months) or lung (48.6 months), versus only the brain (9.7 months) or bone (8.7 months). Conclusions: Metastasectomy appears to confer a superior benefit for OS compared to radiation of secondary sites, particularly in patients with secondary site involvement limited to the liver or lung. More research is needed from prospective trials investigating surgical resection of metastatic sites.[Table: see text]
Self-reported gender bias encountered by hematology and oncology fellows.
Authors: Balanchivadze Nino , Passalacqua Karla D. , Askar Sally , Kuriakose Philip , Duma Narjust , Nambudiri Vinod E. , Springer Kylie , Divine George , Donthireddy Vijayalakshmi 
Published: June 2021

11017 Background: Gender-related bias and discrimination have been well documented, particularly in male-dominated fields such as surgery, and have been associated with increased risk for physician burnout. In hematology/medical oncology, women make up between 41% and 49% of first-year fellows, but represent less than 40% of the academic hematology/oncology workforce. We aimed to study current hematology/oncology fellow perceptions about gender-related bias and challenges to inform interventions that promote gender equity. Methods: An anonymous 18-question survey was sent online to 165 adult and 75 pediatric hematology/oncology fellowship programs. Two group comparisons to analyze survey responses between genders were performed using chi-square, or Fisher’s test (if cell counts < 5), and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Results: A total of 133 fellows completed the survey, where 88 self-identified as female (66%) and 45 (33.83%) self-identified as male. Most participants were White (52%), followed by Asian (29%), Hispanic (9%), Middle Eastern (5%), and Black (3%). Most respondents (n = 100; 75%) were age 31-40 years. More than half (54%) were enrolled in adult hematology/oncology fellowships, 24% were enrolled in pediatric hematology/oncology fellowship programs, and 88% practiced in University-based programs. Compared to male respondents, female fellows were more likely to report experiencing gender bias (p < 0.001), felt more insecure in their job (p = 0.043), felt second-guessed by colleagues (p < 0.001), and were more likely to believe that they had been unfairly denied a promotion (p = 0.003). In addition, female respondents were more likely to report having been mistaken as a non-physician (p < 0.001) and were more concerned about perceived gender bias. Female respondents reporting gender bias used techniques such as wearing a white coat (p < 0.0001), emphasizing a professional look (p < 0.0001), and ensuring “Doctor” (p < 0.0001) was clearly written on their badge more often than male fellows. When asked about how to combat gender-related challenges, female fellows more often recommended formal lectures and instruction about gender bias for attending physicians and non-physician staff. Suggestions about mitigating gender-related bias included encouraging same-sex mentors and open discussions about existing bias. Conclusions: Female hematology/oncology fellows reported facing gender-related bias and challenges in daily practice and often used specific techniques to face these challenges. Transparency and directed education about gender bias may help mitigate these challenges to create better working environments for fellows.