Abstract P18: Radical cancer treatment is safe during COVID-19: The experience of a large London-based Comprehensive Cancer Centre
Authors: Russell Beth , Harris Victoria , Dickinson Harvey , Moss Charlotte , Roberts Graham , Haire Kate , Tsotra Eirini , Gousis Harris , Josephs Debra , Enting Deborah , Sita-Lumsden Ailsa , Roca Jose , Michalaera Vasilliki , Lei Mary , Swampillai Angela , Sawyer Eleanor , Smith Daniel , De Francesco Irene , Guerrero-Urbano Teresa , Van Hemelrijck Mieke , Dolly Saoirse ,   Guy's Cancer Real World Evidence
Published: March 2021

Abstract
Background: The provision of cancer services has been strongly impacted by the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2. Our Cancer Centre in South-East London treats about 8,800 patients annually (incl. 4,500 new diagnoses) and is one of the largest Comprehensive Cancer Centres in the UK. The first COVID-19 positive cancer patient was reported on 29 Feb 2020. Whilst we are dealing with the second wave of COVID-19, it is important to further evaluate safety of cancer treatments whilst balancing risks of COVID-19 infection and complications. Methods: Using descriptive statistics, we report on the patient/tumour characteristics as well as short-term clinical outcomes of those patients undergoing radical treatment (i.e. systemic anticancer treatment (SACT), surgery, or radiotherapy (RT)) for their cancer during the first wave as to help establish the clinical guidelines for the management of cancer patients in a SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Results: Between March-July 2020, 1,553 patients underwent surgery, 1,125 received SACT, and 814 had RT. Compared to the same period in 2019, there was a decrease of 28% for surgery, 15% for SACT, and 10% for radiotherapy. Whilst surgery was performed on more male patients (58%), more women received SACT (75%) and RT (58%). The age distribution was similar between treatment arms, with the majority of patients aged 50 to 80 years. The most common tumour types were breast (21%), thoracic (20%), and urological (29%) for surgical treatment; breast (49%), gastrointestinal (18%), and gynaecological (10%) for SACT; and breast (40%), urology (25%), and head & neck (11%) for RT. Within SACT, 36% received combination therapy, 35% received systemic chemotherapy, 23% targeted therapy, 5% immunotherapy, and 2% biological therapy. In terms of oncological outcomes, outcomes were similar to pre-COVID-19 times; with 6 deaths at 30 days (&lt;1%) for surgical patients and 36 readmissions (2%), 10 deaths (&lt;1%) for SACT patients, and 52% of RT delivered with radical intent (which was the same in 2019). The COVID-19 infection rates for our patients were very low: 12 patients were positive pre-surgery (1%), 7 post-surgery (&lt;1%), 17 SACT patients (2%) and 3 RT patients (&lt;1%). No COVID-19 related deaths were registered for the surgical, SACT and RT patients. Conclusion: Whilst there was a decline in overall radical treatment, likely due to a delay in cancer diagnoses, those who did undergo their treatment were treated in a safe COVID-19 managed environment. Our findings highlight that cancer patients should have the confidence to attend hospitals and be reassured of the safety measurements taken.
Citation Format: Beth Russell, Victoria Harris, Harvey Dickinson, Charlotte Moss, Graham Roberts, Kate Haire, Eirini Tsotra, Harris Gousis, Debra Josephs, Deborah Enting, Ailsa Sita-Lumsden, Jose Roca, Vasilliki Michalaera, Mary Lei, Angela Swampillai, Eleanor Sawyer, Daniel Smith, Irene De Francesco, Teresa Guerrero-Urbano, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Saoirse Dolly, Guy's Cancer Real World Evidence. Radical cancer treatment is safe during COVID-19: The experience of a large London-based Comprehensive Cancer Centre [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: COVID-19 and Cancer; 2021 Feb 3-5. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(6_Suppl):Abstract nr P18.