bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A-141 Vindicated by Awareness: Acting with Awareness May Compensate for Inhibitory Deficits in ADHD Symptom Burden
Authors: Dragulin Maria E , Jacova Claudia 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
To understand the role of trait mindfulness acting-with-awareness in the relationship between inhibitory control and ADHD symptom burden.

Method
We conducted a cross-sectional study with 103 adults, aged 18 to 86, mean age = 46, mean education = 15 years, 46% male. Participants were recruited in North Western Oregon counties. Eligible individuals were aged &gt;18, fluent in English, and with normal global cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA&gt;22). The presence of ADHD diagnoses/symptoms was not required. Participants were administered the Adult Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS), the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) Acting with Awareness, and the DKEFS Color-Word Interference Test (CWIT). We examined the contribution of CWIT (time/sec), acting-with-awareness (AA), and their interaction in age-adjusted multiple regression predicting AISRS total score.

Results
Descriptives for the measures of interest were AISRS (M = 19.21, SD = 12.72), CWIT (M = 55.66, SD = 15.27), and FFMQ-AA (M = 25.10, SD = 7.17). Both CWIT and FFMQ-AA predicted AISRS when analyzed independently (B = 0.274, p = 0.14, R2 = 0.13 and B = -0.633, p &lt; 0.001, R2 = 0.45). In the combined model, FFMQ-AA (B = -1.06, p = 0.000) but not CWIT predicted AISRS, R2 = 0.47. The interaction was not significant, p = 0.55.

Conclusion
AA is a powerful predictor of ADHD symptom burden: it accounts for almost half of the variance, and removes any contribution from inhibitory control. Our finding suggests that trait mindfulness has a more important role in shaping ADHD than cognition.
A-142 A Correlation between Reading Fluency and Processing Speed in a Child Population
Authors: Rifai Lara , Kajani Nisha , Kotalik Kayla , Lopez Ana , Lashley Lisa , Golden Charles J 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
The aim of this study was to determine whether a correlation exists between reading fluency in the WJ-IV ACH and processing speed in the WISC-V.

Method
The data for this study was derived from a large de-identified database. Participants (n = 90) included individuals who completed the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Fifth Edition (WISC-V), which measures intellectual ability, and the Woodcock Johnson IV Tests of Achievement (WJ-IV ACH), which tests for reading, writing, and mathematic achievement. The participants consisted of 36.7% White, 20% Black, 31.1% Hispanic, and 12.2% Other. From the sample, 66.7% were male and 32.3% were female. All the participants were administered the WISC-V and WJ-IV ACH (mean age = 10.53, SD = 2.50; mean education = 4.6, SD = 2.47). Vocabulary was controlled for.

Results
The results indicated a significant correlation between the WJ-IV ACH Reading Fluency and the WISC-V Processing Speed Index r(87) = 0.326, p = 0.002.

Conclusions
Previous research has found that deficits in processing speed affect reading efficiency. Cognitive processes are affected even in children with ADHD who are able to decode words accurately. Processing speed, specifically Coding in the WISC-IV, was found to be significantly associated with verbal span and measures of working memory. Moreover, processing speed and working memory have been found to be significant predictors of oral reading fluency (Jacobson et al., 2011). The current findings confirm a correlation between processing speed and reading fluency in updated versions of the forementioned assessments. Future research should investigate the role of comorbid diagnosis found in the functioning of both processing speed and reading fluency.
A-147 The Relationship of FSIQ and Executive Functioning Performance to a Self-Report Measure of Shifting (BRIEF-Shift)
Authors: Amitrano Nicholas , DeBoer Adam , Bailey Maggie , Scholz Michael , Naatz Lisa , Pyykkonen Ben 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
This study aimed to clarify the relationship between a self-report measure of set-shifting and performance-based measures of set-shifting as compared to FSIQ using the Trail Making Test-Part B (TMT-B), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) perseverative responses, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) self-report shift index, and the full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV).

Method
Data from 65 individuals (34 females, mean age 36) from an outpatient clinic in Chicagoland was analyzed using 2 block-wise hierarchical regression analyses with BRIEF-A shift as the outcome variable and TMT-B, WCST, and WAIS-IV FSIQ data as the predictor variables.

Results
Intelligence accounted for 4.7% (R2 = 0.047, p = 0.08) of the unique variance in BRIEF-A Shift self-report. In contrast, the TMT-B and WCST data accounted for little unique variance in the model and was to significantly correlated (R2 = 0.028, p = 0.416).

Conclusion
The current data somewhat surprisingly indicates that FSIQ is a more robust predictor of BRIEF Shift than performance-based measures of cognitive flexibility. Implications including an understanding of response bias, general aptitude, and normative comparisons will be discussed.
A-148 Executive Dysfunction in Late-Life Depression: Changes and Relationship to Treatment Response in a Clinical Trial
Authors: Schurr Matthew S , Alexopoulos George S , Arean Patricia A , Raue Patrick J , Renn Brenna N 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
Executive dysfunction is the core neurocognitive deficit associated with late-life depression (LLD). This study identified changes in executive functioning during a structured behavioural treatment for depression in older adults and ascertained if pre-treatment executive dysfunction predicted treatment response.

Method
We analyzed data from a large multisite randomized controlled trial of structured behavioral psychotherapies (PST and Engage) for unipolar depression in adults ≥60 years. Participants were diagnosed with major depressive disorder and had Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] ≥24. Cognitive measures included the Stroop test, digit span, Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Treatment response outcomes included pre- to post-treatment changes on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed pre- and post-treatment changes in executive functioning measures across 9 weeks of treatment for 95 participants with complete data. Multiple linear regression models tested whether baseline measures of executive functioning predicted treatment response in (a) HAM-D depression and (b) WHODAS disability scores.

Results
A one-way ANOVA revealed improvements on IGT performance (Total Money) between baseline and week 9 post-treatment (F(1,186) = 7.00, p &lt; 0.01). No combination of baseline measures of executive functioning significantly predicted change in HAM-D or WHODAS scores across treatment (ps &gt; 0.05).

Conclusion
Baseline executive functioning did not predict treatment response (change in depressive symptoms or disability ratings). That is, individuals improved on treatment outcomes regardless of baseline executive dysfunction. In addition, results suggest that these approaches may actually improve real-life decision-making.
A-157 Lexical-Semantic Analysis of Verbal Naming Test Performance in Older Adult Veterans
Authors: Rivera Jesus M , Scott Travis M , Fairchild J Kaci , Yochim Brian P , Madore Michelle R 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
The Verbal Naming Test (VNT), a validated non-visual measure of word-finding ability in older adults, was designed to include words from distinct lexical (i.e., verbs vs. nouns) and semantic (i.e., action vs. object) categories to better capture various naming deficits. This study examined specific contributions of lexical and semantic categories to the convergent and discriminant validity of the VNT, and to how well it detects Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

Method
The sample of older Veterans included 157 healthy controls (mean age = 74.23, SD = 6.67; range:60–89) and 39 diagnosed with MCI (mean age = 72.97, SD = 8.24; range:60–88). VNT item subscales were constructed for verbs/actions (ActionW) and nouns/objects presented either with (Obj+) or without (ObjW) an action component in the prompt. Correlations were calculated between VNT total/subscales and several other neuropsychological measures. ROC analyses compared relative contributions of each VNT subscale in detecting MCI.

Results
The ActionW subscale showed poor reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.303) and did not correlate with any other measures. The ObjW, and Obj + subscales showed better reliability (Cronbach’s alpha&gt;0.62) and correlated with age, measures of memory, and the Boston Naming Test. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for detection of MCI was as follows: ActionW = 0.616; Obj + =0.635; ObjW = 0.689; and 50items = 0.690.

Conclusions
Lexical and semantic categories differentially affect VNT detection of MCI in older veterans. Object words, especially those without associated action components, provide the best measurement scale. Although still clinically relevant in detecting MCI, the poor reliability of verbs/action words suggests revising the VNT may improve its psychometric properties. Future research should replicate these results in a clinical sample.
A-160 Validating the Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen as a Memory Screener in a Diverse Primary Care Setting
Authors: Stimmel Marnina , Ayers Emmeline , Verghese Joe , Weiss Erica 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
Quick cognitive screeners which can be used for ethnically and educationally diverse patients are particularly useful within the primary care setting. The Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen (PMIS) is a brief screening tool which has been validated in such a population. Here we compare the PMIS against a gold-standard memory task (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised [HVLT-R]) and evaluate its utility as a stand-alone memory screener.

Method
In this cross-sectional study, adults over 65 with cognitive concerns were recruited at their primary care visit to complete the PMIS as part of a larger randomized controlled trial aimed at improving detection of cognitive impairment. A subset of those participants also agreed to complete neuropsychological testing in English or Spanish (including the HVLT-R). Correlations were performed.

Results
108 participants (Mean age = 73; 73% female; 39% Black/AA; 58% Hispanic; 52% evaluated in Spanish; Mean years education = 10.8) completed the PMIS and HVLT-R. The PMIS was correlated with the HVLT-R Immediate Raw Score (rs = 0.229, p = 0.17) and even more strongly correlated with the HVLT-R Delayed Raw Score (rs = 0.347, p &lt; 0.001).

Conclusions
Early results of this ongoing trial suggest that the PMIS is a useful memory screener which can be used to quickly identify individuals in a diverse primary care setting who are likely to have memory weakness.
A-17 Self-Generation Improves Prospective Memory Performance in Individuals with Moderate–Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Authors: Weber Erica , Hirst Dana L , Yi Nancy , Li Yanqi Ryan , Loft Shayne , Woods Steven P , Chiaravalloti Nancy D 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
Self-generation has long been studied in healthy adults as a method to improve encoding of new information. The present study applied this strategy to prospective memory (PM; the ability to remember future intentions) in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Method
Participants included 17 healthy adults and 34 individuals with moderate–severe TBI, who were at least one year post-injury and impaired encoding on a test of verbal learning. Participants completed a 15-minute computer-based lexical decision task in which PM trials were embedded. Following a baseline block of 100 lexical decision trials, participants completed 2 blocks with 5 p.m. targets each. PM targets were learned in a didactic or self-generated fashion using semantically-related word pairs, counterbalanced for order effects.

Results
MANOVAs were conducted for PM accuracy and recognition, with performance in the didactic and self-generation conditions as within-subjects variables and diagnostic group as the between-subjects variable. Only the within-subjects variables were significant [PM accuracy: F(1,49) = 5.228, p = 0.027; PM recognition: F(1,49) = 7.226, p = 0.010]. Within the TBI sample, paired t-tests demonstrated significantly improved PM accuracy [t(33) = −2.069, p = 0.046, Hedge’s g = 0.38] and PM target recognition [t(33) = −2.458, p = 0.019, Hedge’s g = 0.52] under self-generated compared to didactic conditions.

Conclusion
Results indicate that self-generation is an efficacious strategy to improve PM in individuals with moderate–severe TBI and encoding deficits. The lack of interaction suggests that the generation effect is robust enough to provide comparable benefit to both individuals with significant neurocognitive deficits as well as healthy adults. Future efforts should explore the incorporation of self-generation in cognitive rehabilitation protocols for PM in neurologic populations.
A-167 A Comparison of Remotely Administered Verbal Paired Associates Subtests
Authors: Nunez Christina , Spagna Samantha , McDonald Bailey , Golden Charles 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many services attempted to quickly transition to a remote format. A need to validate remote delivery of neuropsychological measures arose. TestMyBrain (TMB) from the Many Brains Project has been utilizing teleneuropsychology in research since 2017.

Method
Volunteer research participants (N = 147, Mage = 29, Medu = 15 years, 64.7% white, 54.2% female, 83.2% right-handed, 52.1% utilized Mac Operating System) were administered TMB Verbal Paired Associates(TMBVPA) and WMS-IV Verbal Paired Associates I(VPAI) as part of a larger battery of test via zoom. The WMS-IV assessments adhered to standardization as much as possible such as limiting potential distractions.

Results
A correlation revealed a positive association between TMBVPA and VPAI r(150) = 0.312, p = &lt; 0.001. A linear regression revealed that performance on the TMBVPA positively predicted performance on the VPAI F(3, 144) = 9.344, p &lt; 0.001 accounting for 16.6% of the variability over and above known demographic variables. The rate of agreeance showed that 23.7% of TMBVPA scores were within a one score difference of the VPAI and 37.4% were within two scores.

Conclusions
The results suggest that the two remote administration formats may not be as congruent as originally thought. With 62.6% of scores outside of a two-point range and the low rate of agreement this suggests little real-world application of the TMBVPA. Although telepsychology has come a long way, remote neuropsychological measures may still not be a reality any time soon. Future research should compare both remote administration versions to a standardized in person administration as well as consider other factors that can influence administration formats.
A-172 Behavioral Survey of Traits: Reliability with a Neurotypical Sample
Authors: Larson Kera , Carlson Katie , Morgan Kait , Kessler Robert , Marvin Lydia , Andrews Glena L 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
Behavioral Survey of Traits (BeST; Andrews & Robins, 2010) is a measure used to detect behavior profiles consistent with prenatal alcohol exposure in children. This study sought to create a control group of neurotypical individuals over the age of 18, to assess reliability of adapted BeST Adult-Self-Report (BeST-ASR) and Adult-Other (BeST-AO).

Methods
A sample (n = 51, paired sample n = 23) of neurotypical adults were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional study. Participants (ages 20–60, M = 33.6, SD = 14.4) included 13 women and 10 men with 82.6% identifying as White/European-American, 8.7% Black or African American, and 8.7% Mixed-Race. Each participant provided demographics and completed a BeST-ASR for themselves, and asked another individual who knew them well to complete BeST-AO.

Results
For the paired sample, a total score for BeST-ASR (M = 49.5, SD = 12.9) and the BeST-AO (M = 23.5, SD =10.8) were calculated. No significant differences were found for age or gender on the screeners. BeST-ASR and BeST-AO total scores were significantly different (ASR M = 51.3, AO M = 23). Measures of internal consistency produced a Cronbach’s Alpha (α = 0.84) for the BeST-ASR and a (α = 0.89) for the BeST-AO.

Conclusion
The BeST is an established measure used to screen behavior profiles consistent with FASD. The adult adapted screeners were found to have high internal consistency with a neurotypical sample. Differences evaluated between the self and other needs further study, which is consistent in a probation sample (Mushlitz, 2019). Overall, high internal consistency is encouraging and warrants further study to understand scores in a neurotypical adult sample.
A-175 Personality as a Proxy for Positive Effort: The Role of Grit, Need for Cognition, and Extraversion in Problem-Solving
Authors: Hawley Nanako A , Myers Melissa , Pizer Jasmin , Harrell Murphy , Hill Benjamin D 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
This study aimed to examine the effect of personality traits on a simple problem-solving test of intelligence.

Method
The sample consisted of 82 undergraduates. Participants completed an online battery that included an open source Five Factor Model measure (IPIP FFM), Grit scale, Need for Cognition (NFC) scale, and the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT). CRT is a simple 3 question test of intelligence. An interaction variable for positive effort was created by multiplying the total raw scores for the Grit and NFC scales (Grit x NFC). Correlations were conducted between the Grit x NFC, IPIP FFM, and the CRT total score. Scales that significantly correlated with CRT total score were entered into a regression model.

Results
Pearson correlations revealed a significant positive association between Grit x NFC and CRT performance, (r = 0.240, p &lt; 0.05). A significant correlation was also found between IPIP FFM Extraversion factor and CRT performance (r = 0.230, p &lt; 0.05). A regression model found that Grit x NFC and IPIP FFM Extraversion accounted for 9.2% of the variance in CRT total scores, (R2 = 0.092, F(1,82) = 3.92, p = 0.024). When examined individually, no individual predictors were significant.

Conclusion
These findings suggest that personality traits that reflect positive effort such as Grit and NFC as well as other personality features influence performance on problem-solving bases measures of intelligence. Future research should examine these findings in a larger sample with a broader array of cognitive measures to quantify the role of positive effort in cognitive performance.
A-178 Might Tip-of-the-Tongue Responses on the Auditory and Visual Naming Test be a Useful Embedded Performance Validity Measure in the Language Domain?
Authors: Marceaux Janice C , McCoy Karin J M 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
This study examined whether responses on the Auditory and Visual Naming Test (ANT/VNT) would discriminate between veterans with invalid and valid test performance, thus suggesting a novel embedded performance validity test (PVT) for a language task.

Method
Veterans who completed the ANT/VNT and failed two or more PVTs were selected for inclusion, resulting in a sample of 9 veterans (8 males; Mage = 55.8, SD = 11.5; Medu = 12.7, SD = 2.1). An age-and education-matched group of 9 cognitively unimpaired veterans who passed PVTs (7 males; Mage = 56.1, SD = 11.5; Medu = 14.0, SD = 2.4) were selected from a database of patients from the same clinical setting. Variables of interest included tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) responses (responses with a latency between 2 and 20 seconds) and Total Correct responses for the ANT/VNT.

Results
Groups were comparable on demographic characteristics and there were no statistical differences in Total Correct responses on ANT/VNT. The invalid group had more TOT on both the visual (M = 4.2, SD = 3.8) and auditory (M = 14.4,SD = 9.7) tasks, as compared to the valid group (Mvisual = 0.7, SD = 0.7; Mauditory = 4.9,SD = 2.7). ROC curve analysis for detecting invalid performance was significant for both VNT-TOT (AUC = 0.79, p = 0.038) and ANT-TOT (AUC = 0.88, p = 0.006). A cutoff of 1 was optimal for VNT-TOT (sensitivity = 0.67, specificity = 0.89), while 6 was optimal for ANT-TOT (sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.89).

Conclusions
Despite the small sample size, findings are promising regarding the utility of ANT/VNT TOT responses as embedded PVTs. These should be further explored since the field is in need of validity measures embedded within language/naming tasks. Visual Naming Test may be particularly useful given that it can take less than 5 minutes to administer.
A-191 How Does Teleneuropsychology Digit Span Measure Up?
Authors: Spagna Samantha , McDonald Bailey , Burgess Justin , Sydow D'anna , Golden Charles 
Published: August 2021

Abstract

Objective
To see how strongly performance on a computerized visual digit span task correlates with non-computerized digit span subtests.

Method
The data were chosen from a de-identified database. Undiagnosed adult volunteers (n = 105) took the WAIS-IV Digit Span and TMB Digit Span subtests. Demographic characteristics were as follows: Age (M = 28.5, SD = 11.2), education (M = 16.2, SD = 1.9), gender (60% Female), race (69.8% White). A Pearson correlation was run on the TMB and WAIS-IV longest digit span forward (ldsf) and longest digit span backward (ldsb) raw scores of the same individuals.

Results
Results suggest a moderate correlation between WAIS-IV ldsf (M = 7.14, SD = 1.31) and TMB (M = 6.90, SD = 1.29) ldsf raw scores, r = 0.45, p &gt; 0.01. Moreover, results indicated a moderate correlation between WAIS-IV ldsb (M = 7.69, SD = 1.43) and TMB (M = 5.66, SD = 1.81) ldsb raw scores, r = 0.38, p &gt; 0.01. 73.1% of participants had the same or were within one digit on ldsf scores on both assessments, while 93% were within two digits. 63.8% of participants had the same ldsb scores on both assessments, while 81.9% were within two digits.

Conclusion
Clinicians must note the risk of assuming computerized tests measure the same cognitive functions as standardized paper-and-pencil tests. These results underscore this point. Future studies should continue to assess how well in-person tests align with other computerized tests purporting to measure the same cognitive abilities by examining other variables (i.e., auditory vs. visual, controlled vs. non-controlled environment).