Abstract PS5-16: Impact of drug-drug interaction on palbociclib serum levels: Interest of therapeutic drug monitoring
Authors: Leenhardt Fanny , Gracia Matthieu , Perrin Catherine , Muracciole-Bich Claudia , Marion Bénédicte , Roques Celine , Alexandre Marie , Firmin Nelly , Pouderoux Stephane , Mbatchi Litaty , Gongora Celine , Jacot William , Evrard Alexandre 
Published: February 2021

Abstract
Background: The CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib is prescribed in association with hormonal therapy for the management of metastatic breast cancer patients. Like most oral targeted drug, therapeutic drug monitoring may be used for personalize their dosage. Using a recently published dosing technique (LC-MS/MS), we aimed at evaluating the correlation between first-cycle palbociclib plasma exposition and co-medications in order to evaluate drug-drug interaction (DDI) impact under palbociclib treatment.Methods: This is an open-label phase 4 study conducted in female subjects with first-line metastatic breast cancer (NCT04025541) treated with a palbociclib-aromatase inhibitor association. Plasma concentration of palbociclib was assessed at 24 hours postdose (plasma trough concentration Ctrough) at day 15 of first cycle of treatment. A dedicated pharmacist consultation allowed the determination of clinical covariates of interest, such as weight, body surface area, ethnicity, food intake, co-medications use and DDI before Palbociclib initiation and retrospectively at the end of clinical trial. Patients were classified then according to their risk of DDI potentially leading to inhibition of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein and gastric pH increase by gastric acid-suppressive (GAS) agents (such as proton pump inhibitors, histamine H2-receptor blockers or alginic acid). Relevant drug known to have an inhibition of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein or pH-modification activity were checked in databases (e.g. DDI predictor®, Drugs.com®, Pubmed®). Results: To date, after Ctrough analysis of the 35 first cases, the geometric mean (± standard deviation [min-max]) of palbociclib plasma Ctrough was 79.5 ng/ml (± 26.1% [43.6 ng/mL - 133 ng/mL]) at day 15, similar to what reported in the PALOMA trials. No correlation between plasma concentration and body weight, body area or also age of the patients was found in our cohort. Regarding ethnicity, all the included patients were from Caucasian origin. 31% of patients (11/35) were identified of taking drugs that could cause DDI CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibition mediated (amlodipine n=3, simvastatin n=3, losartan n=2, fluconazole n=1, atorvastatin n=1, ivabradine n=1). These potential DDI interactions were associated with a significantly higher palbociclib concentration DDI subgroup (102 ng/mL vs 69 ng/mL) (p=0.000272) (Table 1). No CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein inductor were reported in cohort. 1.4% of patients (5/35) were identified of taking GAS agents (pantoprazole n=2, ranitidine n=2, alginic acid n=1). We found a significantly reduction of palbociclib concentration (59.2 ng/mL vs 79.8 ng/mL) (p=0.048) in patients taking GAS medications (Table 1).
Conclusion : These preliminary results, in real-life settings, obtained with our recently-published HPLC-MS/MS method, give important information on palbociclib monitoring and pharmacokinetic variability. DDI appear to have a significant impact on palbociclib plasma exposure, GAS agents are already know to modified palbociclib absorption. Additional studies are needed to characterize palbociclib plasma concentration variations between patients, and their clinical impact on efficacy and safety. The study is ongoing and will evaluate additional potential clinical and biological impact of DDI on neutropenia occurrence, on a larger population of patients.
Table 1: Patients’ plasma palbociclib concentration (day 15 of cycle 1 of treatment).Plasma palbociclib concentrations (ng/ml), global cohort (n=35)Geometric mean (CV%) (min;max)79.5 (26.1%) (43.6;133)Plasma palbociclib concentrations (ng/ml), cohort with DDI CYP3A4 and P-gp mediated (n=11)Geometric mean (CV%)102 (24.3%)Plasma palbociclib concentrations (ng/ml), cohort without DDI CYP3A4 and P-gp mediated (n=24)Geometric mean (CV%)69 (19.8%)Plasma palbociclib concentrations (ng/ml), cohort with GAS treatment (n=5)Geometric mean (CV%)59.2 (15.9%)Plasma palbociclib concentrations (ng/ml), cohort without GAS treatment (n=30)Geometric mean (CV%)82.9 (26.1%)
Citation Format: Fanny Leenhardt, Matthieu Gracia, Catherine Perrin, Claudia Muracciole-Bich, Bénédicte Marion, Celine Roques, Marie Alexandre, Nelly Firmin, Stephane Pouderoux, Litaty Mbatchi, Celine Gongora, William Jacot, Alexandre Evrard. Impact of drug-drug interaction on palbociclib serum levels: Interest of therapeutic drug monitoring [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-16.