bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Anticancer drugs associated with venous thromboembolic event: Analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database.
Authors: DA Silva Angélique , Alexandre Joachim , Laneelle Damien , Sassier Marion , Chrétien Basile , Fedrizzi Sophie , Joly Florence , Emile George , Bertoletti Laurent , Mery Benoite , Plane Anne Flore , Legallois Damien , Dolladille Charles 
Published: June 2021

3094 Background: Venous thromboembolic event (VTE) is a frequent complication of cancer, as of some classical cancer therapy, like chemotherapy and surgery. The advent of new therapies such as immunotherapy and targeted therapies has meant that new therapies may be associated with VTE. Reliable data concerning the association between ADs and VTE are scarce. Methods: On March 1st, 2020 we utilized VigiBase (International pharmacovigilance database) and performed a disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratios (ROR) to determine the association between the 206 FDA- or EMA-labeled ADs and VTE, defined as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. RORs were adjusted (aRORs) on population characteristics including the cancer risk of VTE with the primary tumor site according to Khorana classification and metastatic status. Results: A total of 50,438 VTE cases associated with at least one AD were identified. Thirteen ADs were associated with higher reporting of VTE of which 2 represented new VTE associations not previously confirmed in the summary of product characteristics or literature including sipuleucel-t and megestrol. ADs more reported with VTE were lenalidomide (n:5,796), bevacizumab (n:2,780) and thalidomide (n:1,700). ADs associated-VTE occurred mainly during the first 6 months after AD initiation. Conclusions: Although cancer itself may generate VTE, we identified 13 ADs associated with VTE overreporting. Recognition of AD most likely to cause VTE can help raise practitioner awareness and lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment. Futures studies should include ADs in VTE risk evaluation and evaluate the management of VTE when recurrences occur under AD favoring VTE. ClinicalTrial registration number: NCT04696250.
Phase 1/2 first-in-human (FIH) study of CPI-0209, a novel small molecule inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) in patients with advanced tumors.
Authors: Lakhani Nehal J. , Gutierrez Martin , Duska Linda R. , Do Khanh Tu , Sharma Manish , Gandhi Leena , Papadopoulos Kyriakos P. , Truong Jennifer , Fan Xiaolin , Lee Ji Hyun , Bobba Suresh , Rippley Ronda , Wu Rentian , Cui Jike , Sun Kaiming , Wang Jing Y. , Trojer Patrick , Rasco Drew W. 
Published: June 2021

3104 Background: Enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a histone methyltransferase and the catalytic subunit of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2). EZH2 is frequently overexpressed in cancers and correlates with poor prognosis. CPI-0209 is an oral, small molecule, second-generation, selective inhibitor of EZH2 designed to achieve comprehensive target coverage through extended on-target residence time. The compound demonstrates more potent anti-tumor activity in preclinical cancer models, compared to first-generation EZH2 inhibitors. CPI-0209 is currently being evaluated in a Phase 1/2, open-label, FIH study (NCT04104776). Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced tumors were enrolled in a 3+3 design. Primary objective is to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of CPI-0209. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the safety, PK, and PD in pts who received CPI-0209 QD in 28 days cycles (C). Results: As of December 16, 2020, 33 pts were treated: pancreatic cancer (n = 6), mesothelioma, breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer (n = 5 each), leiomyosarcoma, melanoma, cholangiocarcinoma, prostate, bladder, endometrial clear cell and gastric cancer (n = 1 each). Pts received CPI-0209 at 50 mg (n = 4), 100 mg, 137.5 mg, and 187.5 mg (n = 6 each), 225 mg (n = 7), and 275 mg (n = 4) daily dose. Median treatment duration was 43 days (range 1-239); 4 pts are ongoing. Median age was 64 yrs (range 24-79); 15 (45%) pts were male. Patients were heavily pretreated, with 67% of pts had ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy. No dose limiting toxicities have been observed. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (≥10%) were fatigue (27%), diarrhea (24%), nausea (21%), abdominal pain, alopecia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and dysgeusia (15% each), and vomiting, headache, decreased appetite, and alkaline phosphatase increased (12% each); usually grade 1 or 2 in severity. Thrombocytopenia was dose-dependent and not associated with bleeding or clinical sequalae. Three pts (9%) discontinued CPI-0209 due to TEAEs. Comprehensive target engagement (assessed by global reduction in H3K27me3 levels in monocytes) was observed within the first cycle at all dose levels. CPI-0209 also increased the expression of PRC2-controlled gene sets in blood in a dose-dependent manner. Updated safety, PK, PD, and preliminary efficacy results from Phase 1 will be presented. Conclusions: CPI-0209 achieved robust PD effects and a PK-PD relationship has been established. CPI-0209 monotherapy was generally well tolerated, and treatment related AEs were manageable and reversible. The MTD has not been reached. Clinical trial information: NCT04104776.
First-in-human dose-finding study of venadaparib (IDX-1197), a potent and selective PARP inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Authors: Kim Yong Man , Bae Kyun-Seop , Baek Nam Seok , Kim Kyungun , Lee Won Sik , Roh Eun-Jihn , Ock Chan-Young , Kim Sung-Bae 
Published: June 2021

3107 Background: Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) is an enzyme that is central to the repair of DNA replication errors known as single-strand breaks (SSBs). PARP inhibitors are currently approved for ovary, breast, pancreatic and prostate cancers which harbor germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations (g/sBRCAmt) and/or homologous recombinant repair mutation (g/sHRRmt). In this phase 1 dose finding study of venadaparib, we determined the maximum tolerated dose for venadaparib monotherapy and explored the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and anticancer efficacy of venadaparib in patients with advanced solid tumor which progressed after an attempt of standard-of-care therapy and for which effective therapy does not exist. Methods: Subjects who satisfied all of the inclusion/exclusion criteria and provided written informed consent were enrolled in this study. The investigational product was administered orally once daily continuously in a 3 weekly cycle. Enrolled subjects were assessed for safety and evaluated on tumor response using RECIST 1.1. The study was carried out in a conventional 3+3 design, starting from 2 mg up to 240 mg. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and pharmacokinetics were assessed during the first cycle. Results: As of 08 Feb 2021, enrollment is completed with 32 patients enrolled. Most common tumor types enrolled are breast cancer (16 patients) and ovarian cancer (11 patients). Other tumor types include cancers of endometrium, fallopian tube, uterus and prostate. No DLTs were observed up to the maximum tested dose of 240 mg. Frequently observed adverse drug reactions were as follows – Anemia (56%), nausea (38%) and neutropenia (25%). Overall objective response rate (ORR) was 16% and clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 47%. Partial response was observed starting from 40 mg and clinical benefit was observed from the lowest dose of 2 mg. From optional tumor tissue samples, venadaparib exhibited ≥ 90% PAR inhibitory effect in pharmacodynamic analysis from 10 mg. For patients with known germline or somatic BRCA status either from local lab results or examined at a central lab retrospectively, ORR and CBR was 22% and 44% respectively for BRCAm(+) (9) patients. Interestingly, clinical efficacy was observed in BRCAm(-) (18) patients also, with ORR and CBR of 17% and 50% respectively. Conclusions: Safety and tolerability of the venadaparib monotherapy was confirmed with preliminary efficacy signals observed, even in BRCAm(-) patients. Clinical benefit was observed from the lowest tested dose, suggesting the potential to combine with other chemotherapeutic agents. Further studies to explore efficacy and safety of venadaparib in other tumor types and combinations, as well as to explore adequate biomarkers are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03317743.
Expression of end-binding protein 1 (EB1), a potential response-predictive biomarker for lisavanbulin, in glioblastoma and various other solid tumor types.
Authors: Skowronska Magdalena , Tiu Crescens Diane , Tzankov Alexandar , König Fatima , Lewis Joanne , Vivanco Igor , Kleinschmidt Malte , Beebe Kirk , Anderson Stephanie , Bachmann Felix , Engelhardt Marc , Lane Heidi A , Kaindl Thomas , Stan Alexandru C , Plummer Elizabeth Ruth , Evans T.R. Jeffry , Zlobec Inti , Lopez Juanita Suzanne 
Published: June 2021

3118 Background: EB1, a protein located on the plus-ends of microtubules is involved in microtubule function and has been associated with glioblastoma (GBM) stem-cell-ness and more aggressive disease. Lisavanbulin (BAL101553) is a prodrug of the lipophilic small molecule BAL27862, that promotes tumor cell death by modulating the spindle assembly checkpoint and has been shown in rodents to efficiently penetrate the brain. Data from GBM mouse models and recent phase 1 clinical data (Lopez et al. ESMO 2020) suggest that EB1 is a response-predictive marker for lisavanbulin in GBM. A phase 2 study is ongoing to confirm this hypothesis (NCT02490800). A proof-of-concept in GBM would support an expansion of EB1-directed lisavanbulin clinical development in non-GBM tumors, which requires prevalence estimates of EB1-positivity in non-GBM tumor types. Methods: Tissue samples from GBM and other tumor types were stained for EB1 using a CE-marked immunohistochemistry Clinical Trial Assay (Targos Molecular Pathology GmbH, Kassel Germany). EB1-positivity was assessed by a board-certified pathologist based on the percentage of tumor cells showing moderate or strong staining for EB1, using thresholds of ≥50%, ≥60% and ≥70% of tumor cells with EB1 positivity. Whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) using RNAseq was performed in a subset of tissue samples to develop a potential RNA-based predictive response signature for lisavanbulin. Results: 73 GBM tissue samples and 333 tissue samples from 13 other cancer types were stained for EB1. The strongest overall signal for EB1-positivity was obtained for medulloblastoma, neuroblastoma and GBM. In addition, moderate or strong EB1-staining in ≥50% of tumor cells was observed in samples from colorectal cancer (CRC), non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), metastatic melanoma, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). An expanded staining campaign is ongoing in these cancer types. Initial results from the ongoing WTS analyses show marked differences in gene expression profiles between EB1-positive and -negative cases. Conclusions: Strong EB1-positivity is infrequent but occurs in a variety of tumor types, with the strongest signals in medulloblastoma, neuroblastoma and GBM. A phase 2 study is ongoing to assess prospectively whether EB1 is a response-predictive biomarker for lisavanbulin in GBM.[Table: see text]
The impact of clinical decision making in a molecular tumor board at a tertiary care center.
Authors: Sadaps Meena , Demski Kathryn , Ni Ying , Konig Vicky , Leach Brandie , Mazzei Emily , Funchain Pauline 
Published: June 2021

3128 Background: Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards were first established with the onset of precision oncology (PO), as many clinicians were unfamiliar with the interpretation and incorporation of the information into clinical practice. PO has since rapidly evolved and integrated itself into standard of care practices for most cancer patients, yet molecular tumor boards have not grown accordingly and in fact some have been discontinued. There remains a paucity of data in regards to the value and impact of molecular tumor board discussions themselves. We previously reported on our longitudinal experiences in PO ( Sadaps et al, 2018), focusing on the therapeutic impact of matched therapy. Here, we report on the utility of our molecular tumor board in clinical decision making. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients seen at Cleveland Clinic with a solid tumor malignancy who had large panel, next-generation-sequencing (NGS) performed via any commercial platform from November 2019-January 2021. Cases were filtered through a local therapeutic algorithm and then reviewed individually. Initial review was performed by a core genomics committee comprised of 2 oncologists and 2 genetic counselors. Interesting and/or complex cases were flagged for discussion at our bimonthly molecular tumor board, which is regularly attended by medical oncologists, pathologists, genetic counselors, bioinformaticians, and patient care coordinators. Data analyzed included categorization of treatment recommendations and the percentage of cases for which initial recommendations were changed based on tumor board discussion. Results: Of 782 total cases, 575 (73.5%) had a clinically relevant genomics tumor board (GTB) recommendation as compared to 51.7% from our previously reported study. 16.7% of patients had on label recommendation(s) and 86.4% had off label/ clinical trial recommendation(s). 179 (22.9%) patients were recommended for genetic counseling (GC). During our bimonthly GTB, we discussed 173 (22.1%) of these cases. Of the discussed cases, the most common tumor types were hepatobiliary (18.5%), lower gastrointestinal (17.3%), and breast (16.2%). Topics of discussion at GTB included such things as pathologic/histologic/molecular testing, prioritization of available trials, appropriateness of an off label therapy, and need for a genetics consult. Discussion at GTB resulted in a change in treatment recommendation in 63 (36.4%) cases. Conclusions: Discussions from multidisciplinary molecular tumor board impacted treatment decisions for our patients. Referral to GC was also common and should be considered an integral part of somatic sequencing review. Molecular tumor boards remain a crucial platform for treatment guidance and clinical management, especially given the increase in “actionability” over the years due to newly discovered targets and targeted therapies in this rapidly evolving field.
Randomized study to investigate FOLFOXIRI plus either bevacizumab or cetuximab as first-line treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC: The phase-II FIRE-4.5 study (AIO KRK-0116).
Authors: Stintzing Sebastian , Heinrich Kathrin , Tougeron David , Modest Dominik Paul , Schwaner Ingo , Euker Jan , Pihusch Rudolf , Stauch Martina , Kaiser Florian , Kahl Christoph , Karthaus Meinolf , Mueller Christian , Burkart Christof , Reinacher-Schick Anke C. , Kasper Stefan , Fischer von Weikersthal Ludwig , Krammer-Steiner Beate , Prager Gerald W. , Taieb Julien , Heinemann Volker 
Published: June 2021

3502 Background: FIRE-4.5 (AIO KRK-0116) compared FOLFOXIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients not treated for metastatic disease before. Methods: Within this 1:2 randomized, controlled, open-label phase-II study, patients received FOLFOXIRI every two weeks at the following schedule: irinotecan 150mg/m² (30-90min, day 1), folinic acid 400mg/m² (120min, day 1), oxaliplatin 85mg/m² (120 min, day 1), followed by 5-fluorouracil 3,000 mg/m², 48h. FOLFOXIRI was combined with either bevacizumab (arm A) at a dose of 5mg/kg body weight, every 2 weeks or cetuximab (arm B) at a loading dose of 400mg/m² and subsequent weekly doses of 250mg/m². FOLFOXIRI was applied for a maximum of 12 cycles before maintenance treatment was recommended. Primary endpoint was superiority of Arm B with respect to overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criterions. Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, and tolerability. Results: From November 2016 to December 2020 108 patients were randomized in 90 German and 10 French centers (35 arm A and 73 in arm B). No new or unexpected toxicities were observed. Primary endpoint was not met with an ORR of 66.7% and 52.0% (p =0.23) in the respective arms. Median PFS was significantly longer in arm A vs arm B (8.3 months vs 5.9 months; logrank p = 0.03; HR 1.8). While OS data is still immature, median OS time are comparable at the time of analysis. Patients with left-sided primary tumors had comparable results with either bevacizumab or cetuximab, whereas those with right-sided primary tumors showed a trend towards better efficacy of the bevacizumab combination. Updated results will be presented at the annual meeting. Conclusions: FIRE-4.5 is the first prospective and randomized study investigating efficacy of FOLFOXIRI combined with targeted therapy in the first-line treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. FOLFOXIRI plus either bevacizumab or cetuximab have comparable efficacy with differential effects according to primary tumor sidedness supporting the heterogeneity of BRAF V600E-mutant subpopulation of mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04034459.
Microbiome signature, global methylation and immune landscape in early onset colorectal cancer.
Authors: Jin Ning , Mo Xiaokui , Hoyd Rebecca , Yilmaz Ayse Selen , Liu YunZhou , Jagjit Singh Malvenderjit , Muniak Mitchell , Hampel Heather , Spakowicz Daniel 
Published: June 2021

3519 Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in young adults ( < 50 years old) has been rapidly increasing by 2% per year since early 1990. Approximately 20% of early-onset (EO) CRC cases are due to germline gene mutations. However, the etiology of sporadic EO CRC remains poorly understood. Research suggests that environmental factors such as the Western diet (high in fat and low in fiber) may be associated with an increased incidence of sporadic EO CRC. The gut microbiota decompose and ferment dietary fibers to produce microbial metabolites, which play pivotal roles in maintaining the integrity of intestinal epithelium as well as the immune cell homeostasis. Also, these microbial metabolites may influence the host epigenome by altering either the activity of epigenetic enzymes or by modifying the availability of cofactors needed for epigenetic modifications. The aim of our research is to associate intratumoral microbiota with methylation pattern and immune cell composition in EO CRC. Methods: A total of 358 CRC cases, including 54 cases of EO CRC (age < 50 years) and 304 cases of late onset (LO) CRC (age ≥ 50 years), with matched methylation array (Infinium HM450), RNA-sequencing (Illumina HiSeq) from colon adenocarcinomas (COAD) and rectal adenocarcinomas (READ), and clinicopathological information of each patient, were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We characterized and compared the intra-tumoral microbiota composition, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and methylation profile between EO and LO CRC. Results: We found that there is a distinct microbial distribution, gene expression and methylation pattern in the EO CRC when compared with LO CRC. Non-human sequences from several kingdoms including bacteria, fungi and viruses were found and the incidences were consistent with reported values by other methods, e.g. Fusobacterium incidence. The EO CRC cases showed global hypomethylation, even though hypermethylation pattern is expected in the young chronological age group (known as Horvath’s clock). Pathway overrepresentation analysis of differentially expressed genes showed significant activation of p53 and pentose phosphate pathways and de novo nucleotide synthesis in EO CRC. Integration across datasets showed positive correlations between microbes and inflammasome pathway, positive correlation with regulatory T cells (Tregs), and negative correlations with CD4 memory T cells. Conclusions: These data suggest a mechanism by which the colorectal cancer-associated microbiota may be associated with epigenetic regulation and host immune response.
Clinical utility of stool-based SDC2 methylation test for the detection and screening of colorectal cancer in a Chinese population.
Authors: Liu Yanmei , Yin Weiguo , Peng Lei , Wang Xianshu , Zou Hongzhi , Zhou Haibo 
Published: June 2021

3525 Background: In 2020, colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks second in incidence and third in mortality among all types of cancers in China based on data from GLOBOCAN. Moreover, the rates of incidence and mortality have been continuously rising over the past several decades. In addition to conventional methods for detection and screening of CRC such as gFOBT, FIT, and colonoscopy, a stool-based methylation test of human SDC2 gene was recently approved by National Medical Product Association (NMPA) of China. We hereby report the performance of this newly approved test in a hospital-based cohort of more than 10,000 patients in the real world of daily clinical practice. Methods: The methylation target, human SDC2 gene, was extracted from stool and purified via sequence-specific capture technology. The isolated DNA was further treated with bisulfite before it was subsequently amplified by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP) to analyze the fecal level of SDC2 methylation. Subjects were further examined by colonoscopy or CT imaging. Pathological examination would also be performed in cases deemed necessary. Results: A total of 11,284 individuals were tested using the novel SDC2 methylation test. Among them, 858 and 10,426 were tested positive and negative, respectively. Follow-up visits, treatment, and medical information were complete for 429 positive and 780 negative patients who were included in this final analysis. Positive predictive value (PPV) of CRC and adenomas was 36.4% (156/429) and 24.5% (105/429), respectively. Stratified analysis implies that SDC2 methylation level in CRC was significantly higher than those in adenoma and normal groups. In CRC, no significant correlation was observed between SDC2 methylation and clinicopathological features including gender and grade of dysplasia. In < 65 and ≥ 65 age groups, the CRC detection rate in males was higher than that in females―almost two times higher in ≥ 65 age group. Conclusions: The stool-based SDC2 methylation test demonstrated high accuracy in the detection of CRC and advanced adenomas. It is a sensitive and valid modality expected to play a significant role to aid diagnosis and screening of CRC and precancerous lesions in order to reduce the morbidity and mortality of this malignant disease.