bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Satisfaction of hem/onc patients with video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary care center in Michigan.
Authors: Abu Rous Fawzi , Singh Sunny R K , Li Pin , Elgamal Mohamed , Abunafeesa Hussna , Chacko Rebecca , Vuyyala Sowjanya , Alkhatib Yaser , Kuriakose Philip 
Published: September 2021

185 Background: In early 2020, the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic a public health emergency. Consequently, medical institutions minimized health care services to facilitate social distancing and telemedicine became the forefront of patient-provider interaction. Herein, we present the results of our study that explored patient satisfaction with video visits during the pandemic at a tertiary care center. Methods: A 12-question survey (table) was emailed following a video visit with a Hem/Onc provider carried out between February and December 2020, questions were answered anonymously. The survey also collected patient demographics. The survey evaluated 5 aspects of telemedicine using a five-point graded scale. Results: A total of 1107 patients responded. Median age was 65 years (25-97) with 51.5% over 65, 64% were females and 36% males. Based on zip codes of primary residence and 2015-2019 US Census data, a significant proportion lived in inner-city Detroit, 77.3% were Caucasians, and 15.2% African Americans. Median household income was 66.8K (Michigan’s median is 57K). Regarding access: ease of scheduling appointments, ease of contacting the office and ability to schedule desired appointments, were respectively given positive responses (good, very good, or fair) by 97.61%, 97.32%, and 98.4%. Regarding CP: ability to explain problem, show concern for worries, include patients in decisions, and discussion of treatment plan, were respectively given positive responses by 99.09%, 99.26%, 98.9%, 99.35%. Regarding telemedicine technology: ease of talking to CP, quality of video, and audio connections, were respectively given positive responses by 94.27%, 90.77%, and 91.42%. For the overall visit assessment, 98.58% gave a positive response for the video staff performance. Regarding their comfort level to return to clinic: 78.75% were comfortable and 10.14% were not. Conclusions: Patients reported an overall high level of satisfaction with telemedicine. One area of improvement is the technological aspect. More than 50% were older than 65 years and a significant proportion lived in underserved areas which indicates that telemedicine is easily accessible. Moreover, around 80% were comfortable to return to clinic while 10% were not which highlights the importance of offering both telemedicine and in-person care.[Table: see text]
Outcomes in breast cancer from the patient perspective: Development of an innovative, user-centered platform for collection and reporting of patient-reported data.
Authors: Tsangaris Elena , Pattanaik Rakasa , O'Gorman Joanna , Means Jessica , Sarucia Noah , Frank Elizabeth , Dominici Laura Stewart , Hassett Michael J. , Edelen Maria , Pusic Andrea 
Published: September 2021

188 Background: Transition towards a patient-centered healthcare model has been recognized as an important step towards improving the quality and coordination of breast cancer care. Although evidence suggests that patient self-reporting of quality of life improves clinical care, there are significant barriers to successful collection and use of patient-reported data (PRD) including a lack of a technology designed to fully engage patients and providers, limited electronic health record (EHR) integration, and suboptimal clinical implementation strategies. To address this, our team developed imPROVE, an innovative and customizable patient-reported data (PRD) collection platform consisting of a patient web-application and a clinician portal. Methods: This study was performed as a quality improvement initiative at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH). Multiple perspectives were sought from key stakeholders to ensure that the content and design of the platform target the needs of the end-users and garners the latest in technological advances. Development and testing were performed using best practices in user-centered design and agile development, and iterative programming sprints followed by stakeholder feedback and testing. Content was evaluated using probing questions about relevance, comprehensiveness, and clarity. Design was assessed through feedback about the look and feel of the platform and its usability. Results: A multidisciplinary team of 28 stakeholders in the field of breast cancer care, patient-reported outcomes research and value-based healthcare was assembled. Recurring group meetings (n = 8), individual patient interviews (n = 23), and two focus groups with the DF/HCC Breast Cancer Advocacy Group, were conducted. The resultant application is a hybrid mHealth application that is supported by iOS and Android and is comprised of five screens (myCare, myStory, myResources, myCommunity, myNotes). Patients are provided written and graphical displays of their PRD as well as tailored resources that are customized depending on their type and stage of treatment. The clinician portal is comprised of an overview table listing all patients enrolled for each individual clinician, as well as individual patient profiles demonstrating demographic, clinical, and outcomes data. Conclusions: imPROVE has the potential to create a paradigm shift in the delivery of care for breast cancer patients. Next steps will include implementation of imPROVE within the breast oncology and plastic surgery services at DFCI and BWH.
Associations of inflammatory, oxidative stress, and cardiac damage biomarkers and radiation-induced fatigue in breast cancer survivors.
Authors: Vasbinder Alexi , Thompson Hilaire , Zaslavsky Oleg , Heckbert Susan R. , Chlebowski Rowan T. , Shadyab Aladdin H. , Saquib Nazmus , Martin Lisa Warsinger , Paskett Electra D. , Reding Kerryn 
Published: September 2021

191 Background: Radiation-induced fatigue (RIF) is common in breast cancer (BC) survivors and can last years after treatment. Despite the known physiological consequences of radiation, information on biomarkers of RIF is limited. Therefore, we examined the longitudinal association between serum biomarkers and post-BC fatigue in BC survivors treated with radiation: [oxidative stress] 8-hydroxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), myeloperoxidase (MPO); [inflammation] interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), placental growth factor (PGF), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-B); [cardiac damage] cystatin-C, troponin-I (TnI). Methods: In an ancillary study in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), participants with incident BC (stages I-III) treated with radiation were followed for the development of fatigue post-BC. Women were eligible if they 1) had no prior cardiovascular disease and 2) had pre-and post-BC serum samples drawn approximately three years apart with fatigue measured using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) vitality subscale at the same times. Biomarkers were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Higher SF-36 vitality scores correspond to lesser fatigue. Weighted linear regression adjusted for relevant demographic, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors, as well as pre-cancer fatigue. Each biomarker was modeled as the post-BC to pre-BC ratio and log transformed to base 2, thus, the effect estimates correspond to a doubling in value compared to pre-BC. Results: A total of 180 women with a mean (SD) age of 67.0 (5.5) were included. The mean (SD) vitality score was 66.2 (17.2) and 59.7 (19.7) pre- and post-BC, respectively. The median (IQR) time between pre-BC serum collection to BC was 1.9 (0.8, 2.6) years and 1.4 (0.7, 2.3) years between BC and the post-BC serum collection. After adjustment, a higher biomarker ratio of cystatin-C, IL-6, and GDF-15 were all associated with a lower SF-36 vitality score (i.e., higher fatigue) (Table). As an example, for a 2-fold difference in the cystatin-C biomarker ratio, the SF-36 vitality score was lower by 7.31 points (95% CI: -14.2, -0.45). Conclusions: Inflammatory and cardiac damage biomarkers are associated with RIF in BC survivors. Biomarkers could be measured in clinical practice or be included in risk prediction models to help identify patients at high risk for RIF. [Table: see text]
Influence of a multidisciplinary program of diet, exercise, and mindfulness on the quality of life of stage IIa-IIb breast cancer survivors.
Authors: Vozmediano J. 
Published: September 2021

193 Background: Integrative oncology has proven to be a useful approach to control cancer symptoms and improve the quality of life (QoL) and overall health of patients, delivering integrated patient care at both physical and emotional levels. The objective of this randomized trial was to evaluate the effects of a triple intervention program on the QoL and lifestyle of women with breast cancer. Methods: Seventy-five survivors of stage IIA-IIB breast cancer were randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group (IG) received a 6-month dietary, exercise, and mindfulness program that was not offered to the control group (CG). Data were gathered at baseline and at 6 months postintervention on QoL and adherence to Mediterranean diet using clinical markers and validated questionnaires. Between-group differences at baseline and 3 months postintervention were analyzed using Student’s t test for related samples and the Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: At 6 months postintervention, the IG showed significant improvements versus CG in physical functioning ( p =.027), role functioning ( p =.028), and Mediterranean diet adherence ( p =.02) and a significant reduction in body mass index ( p =.04) and weight ( p =.05), with a mean weight loss of 0.7 kg versus a gain of 0.55 kg by the CG ( p =.05). Dyspnea symptoms were also increased in the CG versus IG ( p =.066). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that an integrative dietary, physical activity, and mindfulness program enhances the QoL and healthy lifestyle of stage IIA-IIB breast cancer survivors. Cancer symptoms may be better managed by the implementation of multimodal rather than isolated interventions. Keywords: integrative oncology, breast cancer, quality of life, diet, exercise, mindfulness. Clinical trial information: NCT04150484.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in an Australian outpatient oncology setting.
Authors: Webber Kate , Cook Olivia , White Michelle , Kwok Alastair , Segelov Eva 
Published: September 2021

195 Background: PROMs and PREMs may be useful tools to reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients’ wellbeing and care. This analysis compares baseline self-reported quality of life (QoL), symptoms and supportive care needs between two independent patient groups based on when and how they attended their oncology appointment: 1) in person, prior to the global declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic and; 2) via telehealth, during the pandemic. Methods: Patients were invited to complete a suite of PROMs and PREMs including the EQ-5D-5L, modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-R) and the modified Supportive Care Needs Survey Short-Form (SCNS-SF34) on an iPad in the waiting room before each appointment (pre-COVID-19 pandemic phase, December 2019 to March 2020) or online prior to a telehealth appointment (COVID-19 pandemic phase, October 2020 to April 2021). Descriptive statistics were reported for clinical and demographic factors and the PROMs and PREMs. Baseline scores from pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 cohorts were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests. Results: In the pre-COVID-19 phase, 100 patients (99 females, 60.7 years old) participated compared with 129 patients (128 females, 59.7 years old) in the COVID-19 phase. Primary cancer diagnoses were breast (pre-COVID-19 68%, COVID-19 71%), gynaecological (pre-COVID-19 31%, COVID-19 37%) and lung (pre-COVID-19 1%) cancers. Mean age, gender, relationship status, language spoken, cancer diagnoses, and staging were similar, all p > 0.05. Median self-rated health (EQ-VAS score) was also similar between the pre-COVID-19 phase (74, IQR 33) and the COVID-19 phase (75, IQR 34), p = 0.51. Median ESAS-R swelling/lymphoedema score was higher for the COVID-19 phase (1, IQR 3) than the pre-COVID-19 phase (0, IQR 3), p = 0.03. Median SCNS standardised psychological domain score was lower for the COVID-19 phase (35, IQR 40) compared with the pre-COVID-19 phase (45, IQR 42), p = 0.03. No other significant differences in symptoms or unmet needs were noted (all p > 0.05). The top three symptoms concerns (ESAS-R score ≥7) were: 1) tiredness (pre-COVID-19 33%, COVID-19 22.7%); 2) sleep problems (pre-COVID-19 24.5%, COVID-19 21.9%); 3) drowsiness (pre-COVID-19 21.2%) and concentration and memory (COVID-19 19.5%). Conclusions: Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, these data reflect the symptoms and concerns impacting on the QoL among Australian oncology patients have remained largely stable. Although Australian COVID-19 case numbers have remained low, PROMs and PREMs are crucial tools for continuing to support oncology patients with QoL and supportive needs in the pandemic era. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12619001470189.
Implementation and impact of Choosing Wisely recommendations in oncology: A scoping review.
Authors: Nagarajah Sonieya , Powis Melanie Lynn , Fazelzad Rouhi , Krzyzanowska Monika K. , Kukreti Vishal 
Published: September 2021

21 Background: The Choosing Wisely (CW) campaign launched in 2012 includes oncology-related recommendations (CWR) aimed at promoting evidence-based care and de-implementing low value practices; however, it remains unclear to what extent practice has changed as a result of the campaign. We undertook a scoping review to evaluate the extent of CWR uptake in oncology, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Emcare Nursing and Scopus was conducted for articles published between 2012 and March 6, 2020 pertaining to cancer-specific CWR. Articles were excluded if they did not report on cancer-specific recommendations, were commentaries/opinions, reported on screening or prevention, focused on pediatric populations, or were not in English. Retained articles were thematically grouped based on study objective. Implementation strategies, barriers and facilitators were summarized for articles implementing a recommendation into practice. Results: The search yielded 8565 articles; 98 articles were retained, addressing 32 unique recommendations. Use of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer (14/98) and reduction of imaging in early breast cancer (13/98) were the most commonly evaluated CWR. Of the 29 articles reporting on pre-post CW campaign adherence, 20 reported improved compliance without further intervention. In articles evaluating factors associated with CWR-concordance (62/98), age (23/62), stage or risk (22/62), and geographic location (21/62) most commonly influenced care decisions. Few articles described the development of interventions to improve concordance (1/98) or a protocol to evaluate implementation (2/98) with no further testing of their design. Of the 10/98 articles that evaluated implementation of a CWR, all reported improved compliance (range: 3-73% improvement). Implementation strategies were used in combination and most often included provider education (8/10), stakeholder engagement (6/10), and forced function (4/10). Preconceived views and reluctance to adopt new practices were the most commonly reported barriers to implementation; the use of technology to update practice and the use of education and evidence to build provider buy-in were the most common facilitators. Conclusions: In the eight years since the initial publication of oncology-specific CW recommendations, uptake has been limited. Publication of the recommendations has resulted in some passive improvements in care. Further adoption of CWR likely requires an implementation strategy that includes building stakeholder buy-in, and utilization of updated order sets and forced functions in technology to facilitate change. Future studies should assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the adoption of CWR and the de-implementation of low-value care.
A retrospective analysis and quality improvement education initiative to increase HPV vaccination rates in an inner city primary care clinic.
Authors: Hundal Jasmin , Hadfield Matthew J , Saiyed Alifaiz , Rabitaille William 
Published: September 2021

213 Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most commonly spread sexually transmitted infection and is implicated in the oncogenesis of several cancers, including cervical, anal,vaginal and oropharyngeal cancers. HPV vaccinations have a high efficacy, and recent data demonstrated adults aged 18-26 years old are not adequately fully vaccinated. Our objective was to assess the current practice regarding HPV vaccination among persons 9-45 years of age, knowledge about the HPV guidelines, and recommendation practice. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of Internal Medicine residents acting as primary care physicians at an urban clinic based in Hartford, Connecticut, USA. The survey was administered to internal medicine residents and attending physicians to assess the current practice regarding the HPV vaccination for adults and knowledge of the updated guidelines. The key drivers identified were resident knowledge, communication, insurance coverage, and availability of HPV vaccination in the clinic. An educational handout and lecture was provided with a follow-up survey. Results: A total of 347 charts were reviewed. Of those eligible to receive the HPV vaccine, it was found that only 5.2% received the total dosage. The response rate to our initial survey was 60%. 47.83% did not inquire about the HPV vaccination or recommended it to patients compared to 71.43% of attending physicians (AP) who inquired, but only 28.47% discussed it during precepting sessions. 27.7% of the residents and 71.43% AP correctly identified the updated guidelines. The biggest three barriers were unfamiliarity with the availability of HPV vaccination, insurance coverage, and current guidelines. A short educational review and summary were provided to close the gaps identified with the questionnaire.100% of residents correctly identified the updated guidelines, risks, benefits, importance of shared decision-making, and more likely recommend the HPV vaccination. However, 69.2% were unaware that HPV vaccination does not prevent the progression of HPV-related cancers. Conclusions: Adherence to CDC guidelines regarding vaccinating against HPV amongst resident physicians is poor. The percentage of patients, who received the complete Gardasil-9 vaccination series, was significantly below the national average. Our study highlights a large practice gap that exists amongst resident physicians regarding the HPV vaccine. There was minimal documentation amongst resident physicians regarding shared decision-making conversations with patients. We addressed the knowledge and resource deficit with an educational handout and information session. Our intervention demonstrated improved confidence in discussing the vaccine with the patients and resolved the concern of insurance coverage and availability of vaccines in the clinic and pharmacy.
A qualitative study informing about barriers and facilitators associated to chemotherapy initiation among breast cancer patients: Next steps for an intervention.
Authors: Chavez Mac Gregor Mariana , Housten Ashley , Paredes Edna , Malinowski Catalina , Harris Cassandra , Giordano Sharon H. 
Published: September 2021

247 Background: (Neo)Adjuvant chemotherapy decreases the risk of recurrence and improves overall survival among breast cancer patients; however, delays in chemotherapy initiation are associated with adverse outcomes. The causes of delay are complex and include interrelated social, economic, cultural, environmental, and health system factors . Project Start was a qualitative study designed to assess and identify the multilevel factors contributing to the barriers and facilitators of chemotherapy initiation. Methods: English or Spanish-speaking women, ≥18 years, diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer experiencing (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy initiation delay ( ≥60 days) were included. Participants completed semi-structured interviews designed to explore perceptions about individual, community, and system-level barriers and facilitators contributing to chemotherapy initiation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift qualitative approach to identify concepts and themes within and across transcripts. To supplement qualitative data, sociodemographic data and health literacy/numeracy, physician trust, and social support questionnaires were obtained. Results: Participants (n = 22) identified as: Latina (n = 8); Black (n = 5); and non-Latina White (n = 9). While the interview guide included questions addressing chemotherapy delays, explicit insight into chemotherapy delay was rare. Participants described barriers and facilitators at the patient, family, medical, and community levels. Barriers at the patient level included patient’s hesitancy to initiate chemo due to shock, fear, and denial. Within the family level, we learned of participant’s family roles (e.g., caregiving, income), treatment costs, and the need for emotional support (e.g., not shutting family members out). Participants sought out and relied heavily on support from their communities (e.g., churches, other patients, survivors). Patients described their reliance on the medical team for information, the trust needed to navigate their treatment process, and the challenge of managing information associated with their treatment. Participants described the importance of self-efficacy to take an active role in treatment. Conclusions: Project Start is informing the design of a pilot study aimed to test the acceptability and feasibility of a navigation intervention. Using facilitators and barriers identified from Project Start, we are developing a checklist that will serve as a tool to identify the support each patient needs. Once areas of need are identified, appropriate referrals will be made in a personalized and culturally sensitive way with the goal of increasing self-efficacy and activating patients to avoid treatment delays.