bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Preliminary results of a phase 1b study of fruquintinib plus sintilimab in advanced colorectal cancer.
Authors: Guo Ye , Zhang Weijie , Ying Jieer , Zhang Yanqiao , Pan Yueyin , Qiu Wensheng , Su Weiguo , Tan Panfeng , Yin Hongyan , Wang Yan , Luo Yang , Zhou Hui , Li Jin 
Published: June 2021

2514 Background: To explore the safety and synergistic anti-tumor effect of fruquintinib (a VEGFR inhibitor) in combination with sintilimab (an anti-PD-1 Ab) in patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and other solid tumors. Methods: This is an ongoing phase Ib/II, multicenter, two-stage study. Pts with variety cancer types, including CRC, were enrolled and is continuously enrolling in the study. For this interim analysis, all pts were analyzed for safety whereas only CRC pts were analyzed for efficacy. MMR status were analyzed for all enrolled CRC pts. Stage 1 was classical “3+3” dose escalation with pts assigned to one of the following 4 cohorts, fruquintinib taken orally at 3mg (Cohort A, 3 weeks on/ 1 week off), 4mg (Cohort B, 3 weeks on/ 1 week off), 5mg-intermittent (Cohort C, 2 weeks on/ 1 week off) or 3mg-continuous (Cohort E, once daily), while sintilimab was given at 200mg intravenously with Q4W in Cohort A and Cohort B whereas Q3W in Cohort C and Cohort E. DLT was observed for 28 days. Stage 2 was dose expansion with pts receiving 5mg-intermittent or 3mg-continuous fruquintinib plus sintilimab (200mg, Q3W). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability and secondary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: As of Jan 5, 2021, 44 CRC pts which failed to at least 2 previous lines of therapy containing fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin or irinotecan were enrolled. They received either 5mg-intermittent or 3mg-continous dosage (n = 22, each), the ORR was 22.7% (10/44, 95% CI: 11.5-37.8%) with 27.3% (6/22, 95% CI: 10.7-50.2%) in 5mg-intermittent group and 18.2% (4/22, 95% CI: 5.2-40.3%) in 3mg-continuous group. With a median follow-up time of 8.3 (range: 0-9.6) months, the K-M estimated median PFS was 6.8 (95% CI:5.6-NA) months and 4.3 (95% CI:3.5-NA) months for 5mg-intermittent group and 3mg-continuous group, respectively. Overall, 60 pts were enrolled for safety analysis, including 23 in stage1 and 37 (only CRC) in stage 2. In stage 1, all pts experienced TEAEs, 52.2% of which were ≥ grade 3. The most frequently reported TEAEs were TSH increasing (73.9%), fecal occult blood positive (56.5%), and Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (PPES) (56.5%). SAEs occurred in 8 (34.8%) pts and no treatment-related death was reported. One patient in Cohort B reported manageable DLT. In stage 2, all pts experienced TEAEs, 18 (48.6%) pts experienced ≥ grade 3 TEAEs with 6 (31.6%) in 5mg-intermittent group and 12 (66.7%) in 3mg-continuous group. The most common TEAEs were proteinuria (45.9%) and TSH increasing (37.8%). TEAEs leading to either fruquintinib or sintilimab discontinuation occurred in 3 (5%) pts each. Conclusions: Fruquintinib plus sintilimab showed promising efficacy and favorable safety profile in advanced CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03903705.
Phase 1 trial of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist inupadenant (EOS-850): Update on tolerability, and antitumor activity potentially associated with the expression of the A2A receptor within the tumor.
Authors: Buisseret Laurence , Rottey Sylvie , De Bono Johann S. , Migeotte Ariane , Delafontaine Brant , Manickavasagar Thubeena , Martinoli Chiara , Wald Noémie , Rossetti Maura , Gangolli Esha A. , Wiegert Erol , McIntyre Nicola , Lager Joanne J. , Machiels Jean-Pascal H. 
Published: June 2021

2562 Background: Tumors produce high levels of extracellular adenosine which suppress anti-tumor immune responses. Blocking A2A receptors, predominantly expressed on tumor-infiltrating immune cells, can reverse the immunosuppressive effect of adenosine. Inupadenant is a non brain-penetrant, potent and highly selective small molecule antagonist of the A2A receptor that remains active even at the high adenosine concentrations found in tumors. Methods: This is the phase I portion of an ongoing first-in-human, clinical trial (NCT02740985) to evaluate safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and anti-tumor activity of inupadenant in adult patients with solid tumors who have exhausted standard treatment options. In addition, tumor biomarkers, including adenosine-pathway markers by immunohistochemistry (IHC), are being evaluated. We present updated results of the dose escalation, new results from the monotherapy expansion and new analysis of tumor biomarkers. Results: Overall, 42 patients (21 patients in the dose escalation and an additional 21 patients in a monotherapy expansion) with a median of 3 prior regimens were treated as of the data cut off (DCO, 30Nov20).The dose levels investigated, along with the most frequent (>20%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) across all dose levels are presented in the table. 7 AEs led to discontinuation; 2 (atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction) were considered possibly study drug-related by the investigator. No dose reductions were required. Two partial responses (PRs) were reported: melanoma (NRAS-mutant; received prior immunotherapy), and prostate cancer (received antiandrogen and chemotherapy). At the DCO, both PRs were ongoing with a duration of response >230 days. 12 patients had stable disease (SD) as best response and SD >6 months was observed in 3 patients. Response and stable disease were associated with a higher number of cells expressing the A2A receptor within the tumor at baseline, as measured by IHC. Conclusions: Inupadenant monotherapy was generally well-tolerated as of the DCO at a dose of 80 mg twice daily with initial evidence of clinical benefit, including 2 durable PRs in patients who have exhausted standard treatment options. Analysis of pre-treatment tumor biopsies has identified the A2A receptor as a biomarker which may be associated with clinical benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT03873883. [Table: see text]
Antitumor activity of dostarlimab in patients with mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability–high tumors: A combined analysis of two cohorts in the GARNET study.
Authors: Berton Dominique , Banerjee Susana N. , Curigliano Giuseppe , Cresta Sara , Arkenau Hendrik-Tobias , Abdeddaim Cyril , Kristeleit Rebecca Sophie , Redondo Andrés , Leath Charles A. , Antón Torres Antonio , Guo Wei , Im Ellie , Andre Thierry 
Published: June 2021

2564 Background: Dostarlimab is an investigational, humanized programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction with the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. GARNET (NCT02715284) is a phase 1 study assessing the antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with solid tumors. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study is being conducted in 2 parts: dose escalation and expansion. Here we report on the 2 expansion cohorts that enrolled mismatch repairdeficient/microsatellite instabilityhigh (dMMR/MSI-H) patients. Cohort A1 enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer (EC), and cohort F enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H or POLε-hypermutated non-EC solid tumors, mainly gastrointestinal (GI) tumors (99 [93.4%] had GI tumors, including 69 [65.1%] with colorectal cancer). Patients received 500 mg IV of dostarlimab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by RECIST v1.1. Here we report ORR and DOR, by individual cohort and as an overall population, in patients with dMMR tumors identified by immunohistochemistry testing. Results: For this interim analysis, an efficacy analysis was performed for the patients who had baseline measurable disease and ≥6 months of follow-up in the study (N = 209). The ORR was 41.6% (95% CI, 34.9%48.6%) for the combined A1+F dMMR cohorts (Table). Responses were durable, and median DOR has not been reached in either cohort (median follow-up: cohort A1, 16.3 months; cohort F, 12.4 months). A total of 267 patients were included in the safety population (all patients who received ≥1 dose; cohort A1, N = 126; cohort F, N = 141). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were consistent across tumor types. Overall, the most frequently reported any-grade TRAEs were asthenia (13.9%), diarrhea (13.5%), and fatigue (11.2%). The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were anemia (2.2%), lipase increased (1.9%), alanine aminotransferase increased (1.1%), and diarrhea (1.1%). No deaths were attributed to dostarlimab. Conclusions: Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with dMMR solid tumors, with consistent antitumor activity seen across endometrial and nonendometrial tumor types. The safety profile was manageable, with no new safety signals detected. Most TRAEs were low grade and were similar across cohorts. Clinical trial information: NCT02715284. [Table: see text]
Anlotinib enhanced penpulimab efficacy through remodeling of tumor vascular architecture and immune microenvironment in hPD-L1/hPD-1 humanized mouse model.
Authors: Shan Yunlong , Zhong Chongjin , Ni Qi , Zhang Mengying , Wang Guangji , Zhou Fang 
Published: June 2021

2581 Background: Even though immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) such as anti-PD-1 mAb has emerged as effective treatment for tumor regression, the response rate of ICI monotherapy in solid tumor is low. Many studies have demonstrated that the efficacy of combination therapy of ICI and anti-angiogenesis was superior to monotherapy. Penpulimab (AK105), a humanized IgG1 mAb that blocks PD-1 binding to PD-L1, engineered to eliminate FcγR binding and ADCC/ADCP completely. Here, we explore a new combined therapy of penpulimab and anlotinib, an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor. Methods: MC38-hPD-L1 tumor-bearing B-hPD-1 humanized mouse model were conducted to investigate the effects of anlotinib (1 mg/kg, every day, p.o) or penpulimab (5 mg/kg, twice a week, i.p) alone or in combination. Immunofluorescence was applied to elucidate tumor vessel normalization. In vivo imaging was conducted to detect the distribution of AF647-labelled penpulimab after anlotinib treatment. Flow cytometry and other techniques were performed to investigate intratumoral immune cells. Results: After 3-week treatment, immunotherapeutic administration of anlotinib or penpulimab showed moderate inhibition of tumor growth (tumor volume: 66.5% and 58.4% of control group, respectively), while combined treatment of anlotinib with penpulimab significantly decreased tumor volume to 36.5% of control group. Tissue pathological and blood biochemical results showed no significant toxic and side effects. Immunohistochemistry revealed that anlotinib induced tumor vascular normalization, indicated by decreased CD31+ area, increased α-SMA around tumor vessels and reduced GLUT1+ area. Furthermore, anlotinib markedly enhanced the delivery of AF647-penpulimab into tumors. Combining anlotinib with penpulimab also promoted infiltration and activity of anti-tumoral immune cells by reducing the level of immune checkpoint TIM3 and increasing the IFNγ secretion from T cells. Conclusions: Our work provides a strong scientific rationale for the combination therapy of anlotinib and penpulimab to improve tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy, which highlights the clinical potential for this new combined therapy.
Preliminary data from QUILT 3.055: A phase 2 multi-cohort study of N803 (IL-15 superagonist) in combination with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI).
Authors: Wrangle John M. , Awad Mark M. , Badin Firas Benyamine , Rubinstein Mark P , Bhar Paul , Garner Chad , Reddy Sandeep K. , Soon-Shiong Patrick 
Published: June 2021

2596 Background: There is currently a paucity of treatment options for checkpoint relapsed patients who have had an initial response but subsequently progress. N803, a novel IgG1 Fc-engineered IL-15-complexed protein may rescue checkpoint activity in a checkpoint independent manner via its selective enhancement of natural killer cell (NK) and CD8+ T cell number and function, without stimulation of T regs and MDSCs. Methods: QUILT 3.055, (NCT03228667) a phase 2b study of N803 plus investigator choice CPI in 11 tumor types: NSCLC, SCLC, Urothelial carcinoma, HNSCC, Merkel cell carcinoma, Melanoma (single PD-1/PD-L1 CPI or w/ ipilimumab), Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), Gastric cancer, Cervical cancer, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/ mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) solid tumors, with a heterogeneous mix of prior therapies. We present interim data for 135 patients treated with CPI alone or in combination with chemotherapy as their most recent prior therapy. Trial inclusion required investigator assessed progression on last line of therapy, patients had either CR with relapse or partial response or stable disease for 6 months with progression as their most recent result of checkpoint therapy. Patients with hyperprogression or best initial response of progression were excluded. Subjects received N803 15mck/kg SC q 3 weeks in combination with the same checkpoint inhibitor on which they had their most recent progression. Results: Preliminary data from 135 patients (60% NSCLC) with treatment with checkpoint and N-803 following progression on the same checkpoint show CR 0%, PR 8%, Stable Disease 51%, Progression 29%, response unevaluable 12% to date. A PR or SD was seen in all subgroups. Median PFS 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.6,5.0). Median OS 13.8 months (95% CI: 11.8, 16.3) N-803 is well tolerated with grade 1-2 common N-803 treatment related adverse events (TRAE) were injection site reaction (68%), chills (32%) fatigue (26%), pyrexia (26%), flu-like illness (14%), nausea (12%) and no other individual AE > 10%. Grade 3 N-803 TRAE were 12% but no individual grade 3 AEs were greater than 5%. Conclusions: N803 demonstrates low toxicity in patients previously treated with CPI and promising efficacy of cessation of progression and induction of response and durable stable disease in patients who had previously progressed on a CPI containing regimen in multiple tumor types and different CPIs. Clinical trial information: NCT03228667.
Therapeutic effect of DDR pathway with different functional annotations for immune checkpoint inhibitor.
Authors: Nie Wei , Zhong Hua , Wen Fengcai , Zhang Ding , Chen Shiqing , Han Baohui 
Published: June 2021

2611 Background: DNA damage response and repair (DDR) pathway-related gene mutations have been reported to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). However, therapeutic effect of DDR pathway with different functional annotations is not fully studied. Here we explore the relationship of DDR pathway with different functional annotations and clinical outcomes in public cohorts of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Methods: Genetic testing and clinical outcomes data were obtained from the public clinical cohorts across 10 tumor types. 232 DDR pathway-related gene were assigned to eight pathway according to the literature. Nine predictive models for the mutation pathogenicity were included in the analysis, of which at least five returned positive results were defined as deleterious mutations. All annotations were according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) standards and guidelines. To explore the association between DDR pathways and ICI, DDR pathway mutation is grouped. Patients, who harbored mutations in two or more DDR pathways and meanwhile had deleterious mutation in at least one DDR pathway, were enrolled in group A. Patients, who harbored deleterious mutations in only one DDR pathway or had only uncertain significance mutations, were enrolled in group B. Patients with no DDR gene mutations were enrolled in Group C. We analyzed relation of the group and survival outcomes in four public cohorts. Results: Of 4 clinical cohort analyzed, the group A treated with ICI has the best PFS or OS outcomes. However, the comparison of group B and group C is not coincide across different cohorts. Treatment is the key factor that influents the relation of DDR pathway mutations and clinical outcomes. As shown in POPLAR/OAK cohort, patients in group C has the best PFS (p=0.0381) or OS (p=0.0350) outcome when treated with chemotherapy, but patients in group A has the best PFS (p=0.0083) or OS (p=0.0222) outcome when treated with ICI. Conclusions: When treated with ICI, patients with at least one deleterious mutation and another deleterious or uncertain significance mutation has the best PFS or OS outcomes, but not for chemotherapy. Our study suggested that DDR pathway with deleterious mutations might be a potential predictive factor for immunotherapy.[Table: see text]
Association and prevalence of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients with COVID-19: A single healthcare system experience.
Authors: Ananthula Aneesha , Tran Dat , Thomas Katharine , McQueen Amaker Katie Lauren McLemore , Nguyen Anh , Mahato Soham , Thrash Brandon T , Chapple Andrew G , Subbiah Suki 
Published: June 2021

2627 Background: There are increasing reports of thromboembolic complications in patients with COVID-19 infection. According to a meta-analysis of 28,173 patients, the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients ranges from 7.9% to 22.7% based on the severity of COVID-19. Cancer and anti-cancer therapies are known risk factors for thrombosis. Another study based on registry data reported the overall prevalence of VTE in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with cancer to be 14.5%. Our study aimed to assess the prevalence of VTE in cancer patients diagnosed with COVID-19 as well as the association between VTE and cancer in the setting of COVID-19 infection in a large predominantly urban healthcare system. Methods: We utilized a cohort data query tool in the electronic medical record at University Medical Center in New Orleans, Louisiana to identify patients >17 years of age with a hospital or clinic visit in the LCMC Health system between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 which were considered the base population for the study. Cancer patients were identified via the cancer registry tool. Patients with COVID-19 were identified using the abnormal COVID-19 PCR test result search field. An encounter diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) was used to identify patients with VTE. Odds ratios, p-values, and corresponding confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using 2x2 contingency tables. Results: In our database, we identified 3,807 patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 and 9,560 with a cancer diagnosis. 158,812 patients had neither COVID-19 nor cancer. There were statistically significant greater odds of developing VTE in all subgroups compared: COVID-19 alone vs neither (OR 2.43), cancer alone vs neither (OR 3.8), and COVID-19 and cancer vs neither (OR 10.65). Conclusions: COVID-19 and cancer are both risk factors for VTE. Based on our study, appears that cancer has the greater effect on VTE compared with COVID-19 infection. Also, there is possibly a synergistic effect between COVID-19 and cancer, which further increases the likelihood of VTE. This study is a preliminary analysis. Further investigation is warranted in the form of either variable adjusted analysis of the same data, individual chart review, or a prospective study.[Table: see text]
Priming immunotherapy with radiotherapy (RT) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC): Interim analysis of phase II clinical trial.
Authors: Jacob Aasems , Kreimer Alexander , Wei Jing , Wu Jianrong , Corum Lauren , Reusch Ellen , Woodward Jerold , Cohen Donald , Bondada Subbarao , Adams Val R. , Morgan Rachael , McGarry Ronald C. , St Clair William H. , Kudrimoti Mahesh R. , Myint Zin , Arnold Susanne M. , Villano John L. 
Published: June 2021

2628 Background: Preclinical models demonstrate that combined RT with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) results in specific CD8+ T-cell phenotype associated with a tumor-reactive population resulting in significant tumor response. Sequential treatment could allow radiation to release tumor antigens from immune inaccessible areas and provide robust anti-tumor immune response with ICI. We report an interim analysis of the phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the combination. Methods: Advanced NSCLC and HNSCC patients who had initiated on FDA approved single-agent ICI were eligible. Patients were given SBRT (BED>100Gy) or 30 Gy fractionated RT delivered as a 3-dimensional dose to a single metastatic site within 14 days of the first ICI dose. Primary objective was 6-month PFS and secondary objectives were safety and tolerability, 1Y PFS and OS. This interim analysis was done after enrollment of 43 patients. Results: Between 10/2017 to 1/2021, 43 patients were enrolled, and 38 included in this analysis. Median age was 62 years; 26 patients were male. 9 patients received ICI for NSCLC as first-line, 7 for NSCLC second-line and 22 for HNSCC second-line. 24 patients received pembrolizumab and 14 nivolumab; 21 had SBRT and 17 fractionated RT. Median follow up duration was 11.8m (range: 2.7 - 31.4m) for patients without progressive disease (PD). 10 patients were off-study, 7 continuing treatment. 15 died and 26 had PD. 14 patients died of malignancy and cause of death for one patient was unknown. 6-month PFS was 49.19% with median PFS of 5.5 months. (table) Fifty-two grade-3-5 adverse events (AEs) were reported among 21 subjects. Most common were transaminitis (n=15), lymphopenia (n=8), and GI side effects (n=4). Treatment related AEs included 19 grade-3 events, and none were grade 4/5. Two grade-5 AEs were from PD (oral bleeding and unspecified). There were 20 grade-1/2 and 3 grade-3 immune related adverse events (IRAEs). No grade-4/5 IRAEs were reported. Two patients discontinued treatment due to grade 3 transaminitis. Conclusions: Interim analysis shows that 6m PFS was acceptable with majority of patients being second-line metastatic HNSCC who historically had mPFS of 2.1-2.3 months and mOS 7.7-8.4 months in Checkmate-141/KEYNOTE-040 trials. Hence, the combination is of further interest and accrual will continue to reach the goal. The combination therapy was tolerable without unexpected AEs. Majority of deaths were from disease progression. No treatment related grade 4/5 adverse events were reported. Two patients discontinued treatment due to grade-3 IRAE. Clinical trial information: NCT03313804. [Table: see text]