bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Improving the physical healthcare of COVID-19 patients in inpatient psychiatric settings
Authors: Lewis Marissa , Dionelis Karolos , Vecida Miguel , Phelps Rebecca , Hopwood Helen , Yong Lawrence , Ng Jason , Veeramah Sara , Lloyd Miranda , Clark Tom 
Published: June 2021

AimsCOVID-19 can spread rapidly in psychiatric inpatient settings. Previous studies have found that patients have a higher risk of hospitalisation and death than adults in the community. The aim of this project was to improve the care of patients with COVID-19 in psychiatric inpatient settings.MethodA baseline audit was conducted of care COVID-19 patients received in wards that experienced outbreaks in January 2021 in a London Mental Health Trust. Clinical notes were reviewed for management plans, including clear documentation of risk of serious illness, frequency of vitals monitoring, and thresholds for escalation to medical teams.A new protocol was subsequently developed and implemented at one inpatient unit: “COVID-19: Early Identification of Risk and Management”. This included an adjusted 4C mortality score to determine risk of deterioration, and schedules for observation monitoring based on this outcome. Each schedule specified separate frequencies of monitoring of critical observations (oxygen saturations, respiratory rate) and routine observations, thus minimising unnecessary staff exposure. It prompted venous thromboembolism (VTE) assessment and documentation of escalation criteria.Result44 patients were identified across three working age (WAA, n = 29) and two older age (OA, n = 15) adult wards. 7.5% of WAA and 33.3% of OA patients were hospitalised. 20% of OA patients died following a positive test. 58% of patients had a documented management plan for COVID-19, but only 56% mentioned observation frequency, 19% escalation criteria, and 9% risk of serious disease. No patient received a repeat VTE assessment following diagnosis. The audit identified inconsistent approaches to COVID-19 management between wards, and found no relationship between risk of deterioration and frequency of observation monitoring. Following implementation of this protocol, 100% (n = 4) of patients had a robust plan for COVID-19 management, and 100% received a VTE assessment.ConclusionThe audit supported previous findings that psychiatric inpatients are at risk of serious COVID-19 infection. This highlights an urgent clinical and ethical need to optimise COVID-19 care in psychiatric inpatient settings. The results of this audit suggest that risk factors for severe infection and elements of routine care are not widely understood or implemented by clinical staff. Introducing evidence-based protocols to support clinicians in managing the physical healthcare of these patients may be one way of promoting best practice. The improvement in care observed in the pilot study has resulted in this protocol being rolled out across the Trust in an ongoing quality improvement project.
Alcohol hand sanitisers on mental health wards safety risk educational and QI poster
Authors: McMurray Peter 
Published: June 2021

AimsTo provide awareness of safety concerns around use of alcohol hand sanitiser on a mental health ward, and to consider ways of improving how learning for a serious adverse incident in one trust can better be communicated to other trustsBackgroundDD a male patient with history of paranoid schizophrenia alongside historic illicit drug use and current alcohol dependency admitted detained to Bluestone hospital following bizarre behaviour at a wake. Had been non-compliant with medication. Transferred to PICU due to going AWOL and returning under influence of alcohol.2nd April overnight staff noted him to become over-sedated, presenting with slurred speech and appeared under influence of alcohol – transferred to A + E due to deteriorating GCS – was intubated, and transferred to ICU. Blood alcohol level was 373. Several empty bottles of hand sanitiser from dispensers on ward found in his room and he later disclosed he had accessed further alcohol hand sanitiser in sluice while washing clothesSAI learning outcomes from one healthcare trust in Northern Ireland not currently routinely shared with other trustsMethodLiterature review carried out to search for reports of similar incidents – 1 previous review article suggesting one death and 11 other major complications from consumption of alcohol hand sanitiser over 5 year period 2005-2009.Quality improvement steps implemented to address this riskWard policy was reviewed to ensure patients no longer had unsupervised access to wash clothesLiaised with Infection Control to assess the need for alcohol hand sanitiser to be available to patients given the ward is effectively a community settingIntoxication policy reviewed and education sessions on this provided to all medical and nursing staffRegional regular PICU staff update seminar launched for purpose of bringing PICU staff from across Northern Ireland together to share learning from SAIs and casesResultInfection control agreed alcohol hand sanitiser dispensers could be removed from wards and kept only in locked nursing office with use of visitors.Learning from this case shared with other trusts locally at newly launched regional PICU update seminarNo further incidents to dateConclusionPatient access to alcohol hand sanitisers found to be a significant safety risk in PICU settingFollowing implementation of quality improvement steps no further incidents of patients swallowing alcohol hand sanitiserImproved awareness of risk of alcohol intoxication on ward with nursing staff escalating concerns to on-call doctor more frequently
Audit of documentation of observations on mental health services for older people (MHSOP) wards following implementation of nervecentre
Authors: Rathi Nitya 
Published: June 2021

AimsNervecentre is an application that can be used on mobile devices and desktop computers to record and view physical observations amongst other tools. An audit had been done previously assessing the practice of recording observations using paper documentation. That audit had recommended the use of Nervecentre to improve the recording of observations. This audit was undertaken following the introduction of Nervecentre for documentation of physical observations. The aims were to evaluate if the transition to electronic documentation of NEWS (National Early Warning Score) observations on Nervecentre has improved practice in comparison to paper documentation and to evaluate if our practice could be improved by implementing electronic observations for psychiatric observations in addition.MethodData were collected over a 10-day period looking at all the documented observations from all inpatients on the MHSOP wards that met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected on the recording of psychiatric observations (recorded on paper charts) and physical observations (recorded on Nervecentre). The data were collated and analysed. The new data were compared to the original data from prior to the introduction of NerveCentre and the findings were presented at a local meeting.ResultThis audit has highlighted that the documentation of physical observations on MHSOP wards has greatly improved since Nervecentre was introduced. There was an improvement in recording of physical observations in almost all domains measured. NEWS scores were correctly documented 100% of the time compared to 87% previously. Raised NEWS scores were correctly escalated to a senior and reviewed 80% of the time compared to 0% previously. It has also highlighted that the quality of documentation regarding psychiatric observations could be improved as we are not currently meeting local or national guidance.ConclusionThe most likely cause for the improvement in the recording of the physical observations is the implementation of Nervecentre. Nervecentre prompts users when observations are due, removes the risk of calculation errors and allows for observations to be directly escalated. Implementing Nervecentre for psychiatric observations may similarly improve the quality of these observations therefore improving patient safety.
Patient & staff perceptions of animal-assisted therapy in psychiatric rehabilitation
Authors: Sallette Laura , King David , Cowton-Williams Sian , Mohan Rajesh 
Published: June 2021

AimsTo study patients' subjective experiences of having access to a therapy dog and to assess the staff perception of the impact of pet therapy. Hypothesis: pet therapy services are acceptable for rehabilitation patients.BackgroundAnimal-assisted therapy (AAT) is the supervised use of an animal in a therapeutic setting to help in the treatment of physical or psychological disorders in humans. The use of dogs in the context of AAT - ‘dog therapy’ (DT) - has been piloted in the context of stroke rehabilitation; schizophrenia in elderly patients; depression, loneliness and anxiety in elderly patients; Alzheimer's disease; symptom reduction in PTSD; cognitive impairment; and dementia. The impact of pet therapy in long term psychosis care has not been adequately assessed.MethodThis feasibility pilot study used questionnaires to assess patient (n = 12) and staff (n = 10) perceptions of dog therapy in an in-patient psychiatric rehabilitation setting. 24 patients on a rehabilitation ward with complex psychosis were offered the opportunity to interact with ‘Nugget,’ a corgi trained in the United States as a ‘therapy dog.’ A ‘patient questionnaire’ (PQ) and a ‘staff questionnaire’ (SQ) assessed the acceptability and self-rated benefits of the intervention.ResultAll patients (100%) rated highly on the enjoyment, anxiety, calmness, and comfort domains during the dog therapy, and expressed willingness to receive further sessions in the future. The SQ measured staff perceptions of patients’ engagement, enjoyment, comfort and emotional response to the therapy. 100% of staff rated highly on all questions and thought the interventions had recovery value. Engagement was one key factor noted in the feedback. There were no reported adverse reactions to the intervention.ConclusionOur preliminary results showed high acceptability and perceived value for Animal assisted therapy in a psychiatric rehabilitation setting. Given the impact of social isolation and need for connectedness, we recommend access to pet therapy where possible to be integrated into individual recovery programmes.
A quality improvement project on timely completion of bloods and ECGs on a tier 4 child and adolescent inpatient unit
Authors: Salter Emma , Snow Philippa , Friel Kiera , Biddiscombe Nicola 
Published: June 2021

AimsPhysical health monitoring is paramount to optimal care for psychiatric patients. Blood tests and ECGs are invaluable tests throughout a patient's care. At baseline, they aid investigation of potential organic causes of psychiatric presentations and provide organ and electrolyte status before starting medication. Common psychotropic medications carry physical health risks: bloods and ECGs aid in monitoring potential side effects of prescribed medication.In this local Tier 4 inpatient unit, anecdotal observation revealed completion of these basic investigations was noted to be suboptimal.This project aimed to improve timely completion of baseline (within 72 hours of admission) and monitoring (within one week of due date) bloods and ECGS.MethodThis project was completed within a 12-bed child and adolescent inpatient unit. Using Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) methodology, the multidisciplinary team collated driver diagrams to identify potential areas for intervention. Following baseline analysis, colleague communication was considered key. Consequently, a chart for bloods and ECG completion was created.Each monthly PDSA cycle included the following consecutive interventions:
PDSA cycle 1: chart implementationPDSA cycle 2: chart simplification and font size increasePDSA cycle 3: allocated change in team leader for this cyclePDSA cycle 4: Blood request pocket in officePDSA cycle 5: chart simplification through removal of datesPDSA cycle 6: ECG pocketPDSA cycle 7: box on handover listResultMonthly investigations and admission numbers are unpredictable and inconsistent in this cohort: relevant case numbers per PDSA ranged from zero to ten. The results were presented as percentages to allow for direct comparison between cycles.Baseline and results of each consecutive PDSA cycle described above were as follows (N/A represents a cycle where no investigations were required):Admission bloods were completed within 72 hours in 50%, 100%, 50%, 80%, N/A, 100%, 100%, 100%Admission ECG was completed within 72 hours in 30%, 66%, 50%, 70%, N/A, 100%, 100%, 100%Monitoring bloods were completed within one week of due date in 25%, 33%, 0%, 80%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%Monitoring ECG was completed within one week of due date in 0%, 0%, N/A, 66%, 100%, 66%, N/A 100%ConclusionThrough close multidisciplinary collaboration and chart implementation, completion of bloods and ECGs improved. Low patient numbers per PDSA cycle resulted in large changes in percentage results, limiting the significance of these findings. Wider implementation of the chart within local Trust inpatient wards is considered.
Redesigning community care for safer staff and patient experiences: quality improvement project to improve safety and reduce incidents of violence and aggression in a community mental health team
Authors: Saxena Sarah , Vozmediano Alberto Gutierrez , Walsh Katrina , Moodie Sarah , Mapfumo Rumbi 
Published: June 2021

AimsViolent or aggressive incidents can be relatively common in community settings, and perhaps more difficult to manage than at inpatient wards due to the relative isolation and peripatetic delivery model, which can put staff at higher risk during incidents. Carshalton and Wallington Recovery Support team was identified as an outlier in the Trust and was invited to partake in a Safety Collaborative across South London Partnership.Stakeholders agreed on the aim of reducing incidents by 20% over 1 year by the end of 2020.MethodData about incidents were analysed and staff surveys conducted to evaluate violent events. Patient discharge was highlighted as a particular time of increased aggression. Involvement of patients and carers through patient focus groups and co-production was essential to elicit areas of improvement. These included staff confidence and awareness of existing guidelines. Additional secondary drivers were communication with patients, care pathway development, discharge process and multidisciplinary approach, which each had associated change ideas.The team identified change ideas that have been tested over one year using the Quality Improvement methodology of small-scale testing and PDSA. Example ideas tested include multidisciplinary Risk meetings, Safety huddle tool, Staff Safety training, co-produced Welcome and Discharge Packs with informed care pathways.ResultThere has been a 30% reduction in incidents by December 2020 across a total of 280 patients. Surveys have shown an increase in staff confidence and safety protocol awareness from 40% to 70% by October 2020. 100% of patients in focus groups found the Welcome and Discharge Packs helpful.ConclusionA structured improvement approach focused on staff safety and minimisation of known and potential contributing factors can lead to a reduction in incidents. Safety huddles and risk meetings allow a formal multidisciplinary approach to management of violence and aggression. Staff feel more reassured about safety policies in the trust, with better communication between senior management and colleagues to highlight risk and provide support. A culture of open discussion and transparency was implemented through provision of Welcome Packs including Care and Discharge Pathways details at point of entry to the service. Support was provided to patients with Discharge Packs including information about community services. This enabled a meaningful support model at the end of their recovery journey and an improved discharge process.The team is now working with additional teams and administrative and clerical staff to improve safety. We hope to replicate this approach in our Trust.
QI project: Improvement in quality of Seclusion Medical Review
Authors: Shahbaz Shumaila , Ward Richard 
Published: June 2021

AimsTo establish the improvements in the quality of seclusion medical review after introducing a template to complete the review.BackgroundThe Mental Health Act – Code of Practice outlines the standards of patient care while in seclusion. It also emphasis that supportive engagement/observation schedules should be reviewed in person and continued at the point an episode of seclusion was initiated.Furthermore, NICE also set up standards to monitor side effect profile while prescribing psychotropic for such patients and regular management review. It also gives importance to staff training to ensure these standards.To improve the quality of the seclusion medical review, we completed an audit in July 2019 to ascertain whether medics are following Trust Policy.We identified good results (above 90%) in the following areas:Time of seclusion reviewRecord keepingManagement planGood documentation of risk, mental state examination and physical health.We also noticed that the following areas can be improved:Prescribed Medications. (60%)Medication side effects. (40%)Physical Observations (40%)We used the following audit standards for our audit after our last audit and a template was designed and after discussion with medics incorporated into the existing documentation template.Time of reviewReason and duration for seclusionPsychiatric diagnosisMental State Examination/BehaviourPhysical health (including physical observations)/EnvironmentMedication (prescribed, rapid tranquilisation, side effects, or adverse effects)Risk (to self-DSH or accidental) (risks to others)Plan :(frequency of physical obs./medical review, management, restrictions, exit plan for terminating seclusion, patient's capacity to understand it)MethodWe considered the following aspects:Retrospective data collection from 01.03.2020 to 30.08.2020.Sample selection: random selection of mixture of clinicians on different times and days of the week.Data analysis was carried out by using Microsoft Excel.ResultWe noticed a marked improvement in the quality of seclusion medical review (between 95% and 100%) after introducing a template for it. There were no major concerns identified during the re-audit.ConclusionTo continue to use the template for Seclusion Medical Review which has shown significant improvement in the quality of the reviews which will improve patient care.It also helped us to deliver person centred care and safe practice.To continue teaching and training of doctors.This QIP project motivated nurses to do an audit on nursing seclusion review and made necessary changes.
Increasing routine HIV testing in low and medium secure forensic settings
Authors: Swain Rachel , Dujic Maja , Leung Timothy 
Published: June 2021

AimsThere remain a number of barriers to patients taking HIV tests, and prevalence of HIV in patients with severe mental illness can be higher than those without. Patients in forensic settings may be at even greater risk. National standards state that in areas of high and extremely high prevalence of HIV, testing should be offered routinely on admission to hospital. A review of compliance with these standards took place across low and medium secure male forensic wards in West London, followed by implementation of targeted interventions to increase testing rates. A reaudit was later completed to assess if changes had resulted in lasting effectsMethodA retrospective review of computer records took place to identify all inpatients residing on the low and medium secure wards on the day of data collection. Their pathology records were checked to ascertain if HIV test results were available. If no test was documented here, then patient psychiatric records were searched for documentation of the test being offered.After the initial audit, education of patients and staff regarding the benefits of HIV testing took place, HIV testing was incorporated into primary healthcare routine admission screening and separate consent forms were eradicated.The reaudit took place with data collection occurring in an identical manner.Result183 patients were initially identified across 5 low and 7 medium secure male wards, and 184 on reaudit. The initial audit found that only 30.6% (56/183) of patients had either been offered an HIV test or had a result recorded on the pathology system, but this rose to 82.6% (154/184) on reaudit. After the interventions, 43.4% of all patients had HIV test results available, compared to 23.5% initially. Even where no test result existed, the number of tests offered rose from 7.1% to 39.1% of all patients.ConclusionThis study shows that simple measures to normalise HIV testing and make it part of routine admission screening had dramatic implications for the number of patients being offered an HIV test.There is still room for improvement, however, with 17.4% of patients having neither test results available, nor documentation that a test was offered. This could be a result of poor general engagement with health care services, and would benefit from thorough documentation and assertive outreach.
On-line memory clinic – piloting a hybrid model
Authors: Tomar Rahul 
Published: June 2021

AimsQuality improvement project was undertaken to reorganise memory clinic to incorporate both virtual and in-person consultation (Hybrid Virtual model), as depicted in the following model:MethodTele triage conducted to ascertain information from patient and carer. This reduced time for face to face assessment.Nurse did face to face assessment to complete cognitive test (Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III) & carer completed Bristol Activities of Daily Living scale. Nurse would also do BP, PR, oxygen sats & temp.Nurse discussed the assessment with the consultant (who is in the inpatient unit) on line using MS TEAMSConsultant would then see patient on line, confirm diagnosis, answer questions, give information on medication and post prescription (if required)Feedback was collected using Telehealth Satisfaction questionnaireResultHybrid remote memory clinic was started on 29/09/20. A total of 37 patients were seen in this clinic by 31/01/21.Collected feedback from 21 patients was generally positive –Information provided on video consultation prior to assessment -18 reported it as excellentHow well you privacy was respected – 21 reported it as excellent.Information you received on the treatment – 18 reported it as excellentConclusionThe hybrid remote memory clinic was more effective than telephone consultation or on line only consultation as it was –Easy to establishing rapportPhysical examination could be performedDigital literacy was no longer a limiting factorPrescribing medication was slightly more difficult but possible