In-hospital outcomes of sustained ventricular tachycardia in the setting of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Authors: Santos M , Santos H , Almeida I , Miranda H , Sa C , Chin J , Almeida S , Sousa C , Tavares J , Santos L , Almeida ML 
Published: May 2021

Abstract

Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.

OnBehalf
on behalf of the Investigators of " Portuguese Registry of ACS "

Introduction
Sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT) complicates up to 20% of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and it is, therefore, important to access its impact on prognosis and identify patients with higher risk of SVT.

Objective
To evaluate predictors of early onset (&lt;48h) and late onset (≥48h) SVT.

Methods
Based on a multicenter retrospective study, data collected from admissions between 1/10/2010 and 4/09/2019. Patients (pts) were divided in two groups (G): A – pts that presented early onset SVT (ESVT), and B – pts that presented late onset SVT (LSVT). Pts without data on previous cardiovascular history or uncompleted clinical data were excluded. Logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of SVT in ACS.

Results
Between 29851 pts with ACS, 364 (1.2%) presented SVT. ESVT – 251 pts (69%); LSVT – 91 pts (25%). LSVT G was older (74 ± 13 vs 68 ± 14, p = 0.003), was admitted directly to cat lab less frequently (10.1% vs 24.8%, p = 0.003), had longer times from first symptoms to admission (440min vs 261 min, p &lt; 0.001) and had higher rates of previous stroke (14.4% vs 6.8%, p = 0.028). LSVT G had higher rates of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) (35.2% vs 23.1%, p = 0.025) and lower rates of ST-elevation MI (53.8% vs 71.7%, p = 0.002), although both G were similar regarding MI location (anterior – p = 0.135, inferior – p = 0.097). LSVT G had higher systolic blood pression (130 ± 33 vs 122 ± 33, p = 0.050), presented more frequently in Killip-Kimball class ≥2 (52.5% vs 35.5%, p = 0.005) and with atrial fibrillation (21.2% vs 12.4%, p = 0.045), and had higher brain-natriuretic peptide (1075 vs 329, p &lt; 0.001). LSVT G was treated more frequently with diuretics (80.0% vs 47.8%, p &lt; 0.001), amiodarone (62.2% vs 48.8%, p = 0.029), digoxin (8.9% vs 2.4%, p = 0.013) and levosimendan (11.1% vs 2.8%, p = 0.004). ESVT G had higher rates of performed coronarography (88.4% vs 79.1%, p = 0.028) but lower rate of 3 vessels disease (58.5% vs 70.8%, p = 0.017). LSVT G had higher rates of severe (&lt;30%) left ventricle dysfunction (32.9% vs 15.4%, p &lt; 0.001) and need to non-invasive ventilation (23.1% vs 6.8%, p &lt; 0.001). Regarding in-hospital complications, ESVT G had higher rates of heart failure (34.7% vs 19.1%, p = 0.006), atrioventricular block (15.7% vs 1.1%, p &lt; 0.001), atrial fibrillation (20.4% vs 7.7%, p = 0.006) and major haemorrhage (5.2% vs 0.0%, p = 0.024). LSVT G had higher rates of in-hospital death (44.4% vs 20.9%, p &lt; 0.001) and in-hospital stay (14 days vs 7 days, p &lt; 0.001). The G were similar regarding re-infarction (p = 0.216), shock (p = 0.179), mechanical complications (p = 1.00), cardiac arrest (p = 0.097) and stroke (0.348) rates. Logistic regression confirmed ESVT was predictive in-hospital heart failure (p = 0.010, OR 2.67) and de novo AF (p = 0.001, OR 5.56), whether LSVT was predictive of in-hospital death (p = 0.002, OR 2.70).

Conclusion
LSVT was associated with higher rates of in-hospital complications, but ESVT was associated with higher in-hospital mortality.