bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
168. Syndrome-Based Analysis of Oral Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities at Hospital Discharge
Authors: Cunningham Jessica , Binkley Shawn , Uritsky Tanya , Saw Stephen , Patel Sonal , Lee Tiffany , Hamilton Keith W , Degnan Kathleen , Dutcher Lauren , Athans Vasilios 
Published: December 2021

Abstract

Background
Suboptimal oral antibiotic prescriptions (OAPs) are prevalent at discharge and contribute to treatment failure, resistance, toxicity, and excess costs. Syndrome-specific prescribing patterns have not been widely described at discharge, nor have specific reasons for excessive treatment durations (the most commonly cited prescribing error).

Methods
Retrospective cohort of patients discharged from a general medicine service at an academic hospital with ≥1 OAP for urinary tract infection (UTI), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI), or lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). Study period varied to include a random sample of encounters occurring after the most recent institutional guideline update for each syndrome. Exclusions: multiple infectious indications, discharge against medical advice, parenteral antibiotics at discharge, pregnancy, cystic fibrosis, and immunocompromising conditions. Discharge OAPs were assessed for suboptimal selection, dose, frequency, or duration according to institutional guidelines (with secondary adjudication).

Results
Analysis included 160 encounters: 70 UTIs, 66 SSTIs, and 24 LRTIs. Of 71 (44%) culture-positive infections, Enterobacterales (61%) and Streptococcus spp. (15%) were most often identified. In total, 180 OAPs were issued – most commonly cefpodoxime (21%), cefadroxil (18%), and doxycycline (17%). Overall, 99 (62%) encounters were associated with a suboptimal discharge OAP. Of 138 suboptimal characteristics identified, suboptimal duration was most frequent (57%), specifically excessive duration (45%). Proportion of suboptimal OAPs and their underlying reasons are analyzed by syndrome in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Miscalculation (39%), intentional selection of guideline-discordant duration (29%), and omission of inpatient antibiotic days (19%) were the most frequent reasons for suboptimal duration (Fig. 3).

Conclusion
Suboptimal discharge OAPs were common for all studied syndromes, most notably SSTI. Excessive duration was a key driver, with reasons for inappropriate duration previously undescribed. Duration miscalculation and selection of appropriate treatment duration are key areas to focus electronic health record enhancements, provider education, and antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
169. Prevalence and Associated Patient Characteristics of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms and Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Authors: Rodriguez Leah , Morita Kazumi , Tencza Elizabeth , Mueller Daniel 
Published: December 2021

Abstract

Background
The 2019 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines eliminated the term healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), and recommends to guide the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics by locally validating the prevalence and risk factors of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence and associated patient characteristics of MDROs, and to characterize antibiotic prescribing patterns.

Methods
This was a retrospective, cohort study in adult patients hospitalized from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19. Patients were randomly selected from a patient list of diagnosis codes suggestive of pneumonia. We excluded patients with antibiotic therapy &lt; 48 hours, bacterial co-infections from another site, or transferred from another hospital with length of stay &gt;24 hours. Endpoints evaluated include the percentage of MDRO isolated from a respiratory or blood culture collected within 2 days of admission, comparison of patient characteristics associated with MDROs with those who did not, treatment regimen and duration, and rate of overtreatment and undertreatment.

Results
A total of 220 patients were included. Prevalence of overall MDRO, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) was 8%, 3%, and 5%, respectively. Patient characteristics associated with MDROs from are shown in Table 1. Prior MDRO history or recent intravenous (IV) antibiotic exposure during hospitalization was present in 39% of the MDRO cohort. Over half (58%) of the patients were initiated on antibiotics with MRSA and/or PSA coverage. Rate of overtreatment and undertreatment was 89% and 5%, respectively. Mean antibiotic duration was 9 ± 3 days.

Conclusion
The low prevalence of MDROs, coupled with the high overtreatment and low undertreatment rate suggests most patients hospitalized with CAP at our institution can receive an antibiotic regimen targeting standard CAP pathogens. Antibiotic stewardship intervention to shorten the duration of therapy should be considered. In addition to microbiology history and recent IV antibiotic exposure during hospitalization, further studies are needed to validate other patient characteristics at risk for MDROs.

Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
170. Antimicrobial Use Before and During COVID-19 – Data from 108 VA Facilities
Authors: Goetz Matthew B , Goetz Matthew B , Willson Tina M , Stevens Vanessa W , Graber Christopher J , Rubin Michael 
Published: December 2021

Abstract

Background
Increased antibiotic prescribing rates during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic have been widely reported. We previously reported that while both antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) and total days present (DP) declined in the first 5 months of 2020 at Veterans Affairs (VA) acute care facilities nationwide relative to the comparable period in 2019, antibiotic DOT per 1000 DP increased by 11.3%, largely reversing declines in VA antimicrobial utilization from 2015 – 2019. We now evaluate whether these changes in antibiotic use persisted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods
Data on antibacterial use, patient days present, and COVID-19 care for acute inpatient care units in 108 VA level 1 and 2 facilities were extracted through the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure; level 3 facilities which provide limited acute inpatient services were excluded. DOT per 1000 DP were calculated and stratified by CDC-defined antibiotic classes.

Results
From 1/2020 to 2/2021, care for 34,096 COVID-19 patients accounted for 13% of all acute inpatient days of care in the VA. Following the onset of COVID-19 pandemic, monthly total acute care antibiotic use increased from 533 DOT/1000 DP in 1/2020 to a peak of 583 DOT/1000 DP in 4/2020; during that month COVID-19 patients accounted for 13% of all DP (Figure). In subsequent months, total antibiotic use declined such that for the full year the change of antibiotic use from 2019 to 2020 (a decrease of 18 DOT/1000 DP) was similar to the rate of decline from 2015 to 2019 (mean decrease of 13 DOT/1000 DP; Table). The decreased DOT/1000 DP from 5/2020 to 2/2021 occurred even as the percentage of all DP due to COVID-19 peaked at 14 - 24% from 11/2020 to 2/2021.

Conclusion
Although rates of antibiotic use increased within the VA during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, rates subsequently decreased to below previous baseline levels even as the proportion of COVID-19 DP spiked between 11/2020 and 02/2021. Although the degree to which the initial increase in antibiotic use is attributable to concerns of bacterial superinfection versus changes in case-mix (e.g., decreased elective admission) remains to be assessed, these data support the continued effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programs in the VA.

Disclosures
Matthew B. Goetz, MD, Nothing to disclose
171. A Multicenter Analysis of Inpatient Antibiotic Use During the 2015-2019 Influenza Season in the US: Untapped Opportunities for Antimicrobial Stewardship
Authors: Amiche Amine , Kabler Heidi , Weeks Janet , Yu Kalvin , Gupta Vikas 
Published: December 2021

Abstract

Background
Inappropriate antibiotic (AB) use for viral respiratory illnesses remains widespread in the United States (US) with strong seasonal fluctuations. In contrast to outpatient AB use, the seasonality inpatient AB utilization (IAU) and its correlation with the influenza season are not well understood. We sought to describe trends, seasonality, and the association between IAU use and the 2015-2019 influenza seasons.

Methods
We used the BD Insights Research Database (Franklin Lakes, NJ USA) to identify IAU that were prescribed in patients &gt;17 years old from up to 236 US acute care facilities from July 2015 to December 2019. We included the following AB categories: extended spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs), macrolides, β-lactam inhibitor combination (BLIC), fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, glycopeptides, lipopeptide, tetracyclines, and others. We defined IAU use as days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days present. We used influenza laboratory data to identify facility-level positivity ratio per 100 tests. We used random effect models to estimate IAU: 1) trends overtime, 2) seasonality, and 3) association with influenza positivity rate.

Results
For IAU from 2015 to 2019, BLICs, ESCs, and glycopeptides were the most used [average 91, 107, and 96 DOT/1000 days presents, respectively]. Visually, we observed strong seasonality that matches the influenza season for macrolide, ESC, and quinolone use (See Figure). Unadjusted bivariate results showed ascending trends over time for BLICs [β= 3.8, p= .003], ESCs [β= 11.0, p= .005], and macrolides [β=1.5, p= .005]. Unadjusted bivariate results showed descending trends with quinolones [β= -10.9, p&lt; .001] and others [β= -2.060, p&lt; .001]. In the adjusted analysis, increased influenza positivity rate was associated with use of ESCs, glycopeptides, lipopeptides, macrolides, fluoroquinolone, and tetracyclines (see Table). No correlation was observed with BLICs, carbapenems, lipopeptides, and Others.
IAU (DOT/1000 days presents) and Flu Rate (% Positive) Trends Over Time

Conclusion
Our study shows that IAU is on the rise for the ESC and BLIC classes. ESC and macrolide use was strongly correlated with influenza season. Monitoring influenza signals may provide more insights that can inform the interpretation of IAU trends and be incorporated into antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Disclosures
Amine Amiche, PhD, Sanofi (Employee, Shareholder) Heidi Kabler, MD, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee) Janet Weeks, PhD, Becton, Dickinson and Company (Employee) Kalvin Yu, MD, BD (Employee) Vikas Gupta, PharmD, BCPS, Becton, Dickinson and Company (Employee, Shareholder)
172. Inpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns Using the WHO Access Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) Classification in Okinawa, Japan: A Point Prevalence Survey
Authors: Patel Payal K , Satoh Naoyuki , Narita Masashi , Cho Yoshiaki , Oshiro Yusuke , Suzuki Tomoharu , Fowler Karen E , Todd Greene M , Tokuda Yasuharu , Kaye Keith S 
Published: December 2021

Abstract

Background
Few studies have been done on inpatient antibiotic use in Japan and antibiotic stewardship programs with dedicated full-time equivalents are rare. We sought to better understand inpatient antibiotic use in Okinawa, Japan. We applied the World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) Classification to compare our findings to international literature. Access antibiotics are common front-line antibiotics, Watch antibiotics are high-priority antibiotics with toxicity or resistance concerns, and Reserve antibiotics are last-line treatments for multi-drug resistant infections.

Methods
A point prevalence study was conducted in five hospitals in Okinawa, Japan on Oct 1, 2020. Physicians conducted chart reviews of all patients receiving intravenous antibiotics. Type of antibiotic, reason for use, duration, and microbiologic data was collected. The primary aim was to evaluate the proportion of patients who received antibiotics on the assessment date; secondary aims were to categorize antibiotics according to indication, class and AWaRe classification. Descriptive statistics were used to derive the distribution of AWaRe Classifications and drug class.

Results
1,728 unique patients were included and 504 (29%) received ≥1 antibiotic on the assessment date. A total of 559 antibiotics were used for 504 patients and 22.0% (n=123) were for prophylaxis. Of those receiving antibiotics for treatment (N=436), 385 (88.3%) patients had a documented infection source. The most common indications for antibiotic use were pneumonia (24.2% n=93), urinary tract infection (19.7% n=76), and intraabdominal (17.9% n=69). Overall, 43.1% (n=241) of the antibiotics were categorized Access and 54.4% (n=304) Watch [Figure 1]. Cephalosporins were the most common antibiotic class (56% n=313), followed by β-lactam inhibitors (18% n=106) and narrow penicillins (8.2% n=46) [Figure 2].

Conclusion
29% of inpatients in these 5 Okinawan hospitals were prescribed an antibiotic on the survey date. A majority of antibiotics used fall under the WHO AWaRe Watch classification which are antibiotics that may be more likely to cause resistance. Understanding appropriateness of antibiotics used in this population could inform antibiotic stewardship strategies and reduce antibiotic resistance.
Figure 1. Antibiotic Distribution According to World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) Classification

Figure 2. Antibiotic Distribution by Class in Okinawan Hospitals

Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
173. Antimicrobial Stewardship Education Changes Prescribing Behavior and Reduces Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria
Authors: Arab Niki , Gupta Bali , Kim Brian , Jeng Arthur 
Published: December 2021

Abstract

Background
Treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) outside of pregnancy and urological procedures increases the risk of antibiotic resistance without improving outcomes. At Olive View-UCLA Medical Center (Sylmar, CA), the CDC U.S. Antibiotic Awareness Week (AAW) was utilized as a platform to promote antimicrobial stewardship (AS) for ASB. We evaluated the incidence of antibiotic treatment of ASB pre-AAW vs post-AAW, and the impact of AS education on future prescribing practices for ASB.

Methods
In this single-center retrospective observational study, AS education defining ASB vs urinary tract infection (UTI) was provided via visual aids distributed throughout the hospital during AAW from 11/18/2020 to 11/24/2020 (Figure 1). All positive urine cultures (Ucx) for adult inpatients were reviewed prior to AAW from 9/2020 to 11/2020 and after AAW from 12/2020 to 1/2021. Patients were excluded if they were unable to report UTI symptoms, pregnant, or undergoing urological procedure. The incidence of ASB treatment pre- and post-AAW was compared. A survey was sent to providers to compare the impact on antibiotic prescribing behavior for ASB pre- and post-AAW. Fisher’s exact and Chi-squared tests were used for statistical analysis.
Figure 1. Antimicrobial Stewardship Education and Poster Distribution

Results
A total of 260 cases met study eligibility. In the pre-AAW group, 56 of 131 cases presented with ASB, of which 16 were treated with antibiotics (28.6%). In the post-AAW group, 55 of 129 cases presented with ASB, and 5 were treated with antibiotics (9.1%). Antibiotics were prescribed more often for patients with ASB in the pre-AAW group compared to those in the post-AAW group (p=0.014). Forty providers completed the survey, of which 97.5% had seen the visual aids, 70% had found the education "very” or “extremely" useful, and 43.6% reported they “always or sometimes” treated ASB pre-AAW vs 15% post-AAW (p&lt; 0.01).

Conclusion
AS posters and education defining ASB significantly decreased the treatment of ASB. AAW education on ASB antimicrobial stewardship demonstrated a high value and shifted prescribing behavior to avoid antibiotic treatment of ASB. A similar approach to deliver provider education could serve as a valuable model to change provider AS practices for ASB.

Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
175. Assessment of Institutional Uptake of Vancomycin AUC Monitoring One-Year Post Guideline Publication in Hospitals Across the United States
Authors: Bradley Nicole , Lee Yuman , Francis Ariel E , Iregbulem Duchess 
Published: December 2021

Abstract

Background
A new therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections guideline was published in March 2020. The guideline recommends a change in monitoring from trough to AUC/MIC based to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine institutional uptake of vancomycin AUC monitoring 1-year post guideline publication in hospitals across the U.S.

Methods
An electronic survey was created to assess vancomycin AUC monitoring practices and distributed to the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Infections Diseases Practice and Research Network (ACCP IDprn) and American Society of Health System Pharmacists (ASHP). Initial survey distribution (phase 1) occurred May-June 2020 and aimed to serve as baseline data. The survey was re-distributed (phase 2) to the ACCP IDprn and ASHP one year later, May-June 2021. Prior to re-distribution the survey was updated to assess the impact of COVID-19 on uptake. Results were analyzed and reported using descriptive statistics. Chi-Square tests were used to compare categorical data.

Results
A total of 202 responses to phase 1 and 138 responses to phase 2 were recorded. Significantly more respondents implemented AUC monitoring 1-year post guideline than at baseline (42.8% vs 29.8%, p= 0.013). In both phases, 57% of those who had not implemented AUC monitoring had plans to do so over the next year. Additionally, 46.2% phase 2 respondents reported COVID-19 impacted their ability to transition to AUC monitoring citing issues such as lack of time and inadequate resources. The most common AUC monitoring programs utilized at baseline and 1-year post guideline were purchased Bayesian software (38.3% vs. 35.6%) and homemade software (26.1% vs 23.7%). Perceived challenges to implementing AUC monitoring included cost, difficult use and integration.

Conclusion
Increased uptake of vancomycin AUC monitoring occurred from baseline to 1-year post guideline publication. However, less than half of hospitals implemented this recommendation. Although COVID-19 impacted a large portion respondents’ ability to implement AUC monitoring, majority plan to transition to vancomycin AUC monitoring over the next year. AUC monitoring should be adapted by all hospitals to optimize vancomycin efficacy and safety.

Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
176. Topical Antibiotic and Antiseptic Use in the Operating Room: An Opportunity for Antimicrobial Stewardship?
Authors: Nissan Josef Hadib , Murphy Nina Naeger , Patel Nilam , Borovicka Mary , Hecker Michelle , Gothard David 
Published: December 2021

Abstract

Background
Data suggest that topical antibiotic and antiseptic use in the operating room is common but not commonly monitored by antimicrobial stewardship programs. Although some data suggest a benefit in certain surgical procedures, the CDC and WHO advise against the routine use of topical antibiotics in surgery due to uncertainty and heterogeneity in the overall data.

Methods
We conducted a retrospective 28-day period prevalence study of topical antibiotic and antiseptic use during surgical procedures performed in the operating room by 6 surgical specialties at a tertiary care medical center. For the subset of patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries, we evaluated the types of topical antibiotics received and the rates of surgical site infections (SSI) and adverse drug events within 28 days of the procedure.

Results
Of 744 surgical procedures reviewed, topical antibiotics were used in 127 (17.1%), topical antiseptics in 71 (9.5%), and both in 18 (2.4%) (Table 1). Antiseptic use was higher in orthopedics relative to all other surgical specialties while topical antibiotic use was higher in neurosurgery. Hand, vascular and plastics had distinguishably lower use. In the orthopedic subgroup, after exclusions, 218 procedures were evaluated. Topical antibiotics were used in 42 (19.2%). Topical antibiotic therapy was more likely to be administered if prosthetic material was implanted, the procedure was emergent, or if a Staphylococcus aureus infection was present. Vancomycin was the most commonly used topical antibiotic and powder was the most commonly used type of application. As shown in table 2, SSI occurred more often when both topical antibiotics and antiseptics were applied; however, SSI events were relatively uncommon, and these were more likely to have infection present at the time of surgery. Adverse events were rare.

Conclusion
In our institution we noted significant variability in use of topical antibiotic and antiseptic therapy among surgical specialties as well as within the orthopedic surgical specialty. Although opportunities to standardize use/nonuse of these therapies exist, this may be challenging due to the uncertainty and heterogeneity of currently available data.

Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures
178. Comparing the Incidence of Multidrug Resistant Bacteremia, Fungemia and Hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile Infection in COVID-19 Versus Non-COVID-19 Patients: a Single Hospital, One-year Observational Study in New York City
Authors: Chiu Chia-Yu , Sarwal Amara , Widjaja Michael , Feinstein Addi 
Published: December 2021

Abstract
This abstract has been withdrawn.
179. Follow-up Blood Cultures for Gram-negative Bacilli Bacteremia Were Associated with Prolonged Length of Hospital Stay and Duration of Antibiotic Treatment: A Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study
Authors: Mitaka Hayato , Kuno Toshiki , Fujitani Shigeki 
Published: December 2021

Abstract

Background
It remains unclear if follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bacteremia should be performed routinely to document clearance of bacteremia due to lack of evidence on the value of FUBCs for GNB bacteremia.

Methods
We conducted a retrospective, multicenter observational study at 4 acute care hospitals to examine if FUBCs are associated with length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment, and mortality of hospitalized patients with GNB bacteremia. Participants included adult patients who were hospitalized between January 2017 and December 2018 with GNB bacteremia. Patients with and without FUBCs were propensity score-matched with a 1:1. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and duration of antibiotic treatment during the hospital stay.

Results
Of the 442 hospitalized adult patients with GNB bacteremia, 381 were included in the study. Of those, FUBCs were performed in 276 patients (72%). After propensity score matching, we included 87 patients with FUBCs and 87 patients without FUBCs for comparing outcomes. The median length of stay was longer in patients with FUBCs (9 days [interquartile range, 6.0–14.0]) compared with patients without FUBCs (7 days [interquartile range, 4.5–10.5]; P=0.017). The median duration of antibiotic treatment was also longer in patients with FUBCs (8 days [interquartile range 5.5–13.0]) compared with patients without FUBCs (6 days [interquartile range, 4.0–10.0]; P=0.007). No statistically significant difference was observed in in-hospital mortality between patients with and without FUBCs (adjusted odds ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.081–1.36).

Conclusion
Performing FUBCs for GNB bacteremia were associated with prolonged length of hospital stay and duration of antibiotic treatment but not with mortality.

Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures