bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab with selective bladder sparing in patients with muscle- invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): HCRN GU 16-257.
Authors: Galsky Matt D. , Daneshmand Siamak , Chan Kevin G. , Dorff Tanya B. , Cetnar Jeremy Paul , O Neil Brock , D'souza Anishka , Mamtani Ronac , Kyriakopoulos Christos , Garcia Philip , Izadmehr Sudeh , Yu Menggang , Zhao Qianqian , Mehrazin Reza , Lewis Sara C , Sfakianos John , Pal Sumanta K. 
Published: June 2021

4503 Background: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) plus systemic therapy has been known for decades to achieve durable bladder-intact survival in a subset of patients with MIBC but efforts to advance this paradigm have been complicated by (a) lack of prospective studies exclusively testing cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (b) lack of rigorous methods to define clinical complete response (cCR) and its association with long term outcomes and (c) limited understanding of the role of “salvage” cystectomy. Methods: Eligible patients were cisplatin-eligible with cT2-T4aN0M0 urothelial bladder cancer. Patients received 4 cycles of gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab followed by clinical restaging including urine cytology, MRI/CT of the bladder, cystoscopy and bladder/prostatic urethral biopsies. Patients achieving a cCR (normal cytology, imaging, and cT0/Ta) were eligible to proceed without cystectomy and receive nivolumab q2 weeks x 8 followed by surveillance; otherwise, patients underwent cystectomy. Coprimary endpoints included (1) cCR rate and (2) ability of cCR to predict 2-year metastasis-free survival (MFS). The key secondary endpoint was the impact of genomic alterations in baseline TURBT (TMB, ERCC2, FANCC, RB1, ATM) on performance of cCR for predicting MFS. The cCR rate coprimary endpoint, and interim analysis of 1-year outcomes, are reported. Results: Between 8/2018-11/2020, 76 patients were enrolled at 7 sites (male 79%, median age 69; cT2 = 56%, cT3 = 32%, cT4 = 12%) and 64 (84%) have completed post-cycle 4 restaging; 31/64 achieved a cCR (48%; 95% CI 36%, 61%). The median follow-up of cCR patients is 13.7 months (range, 2.5-24 months). One cCR patient opted for immediate cystectomy (pTaN0M0). Outcomes for the entire cohort are summarized in the table below. Local recurrence has occurred in 8/31 cCR patients and 6 underwent cystectomy (pT0N0 = 1, pTaN0 = 1, pTisN0 =1, pT2N0 = 2, pT4N1 = 1). TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb (p=0.02) or mutant ERCC2 (p=0.02) were associated with cCR or pT0. Conclusions: TURBT + gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab achieves stringently defined cCR in a large subset of patients with MIBC. 1-year bladder intact survival is possible though the durability of responses, and role of genomic biomarkers in management algorithms, requires longer follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT03558087. [Table: see text]
Outcomes of patients who progressed while receiving avelumab + axitinib (A + Ax) and received subsequent treatment (Tx) in JAVELIN Renal 101.
Authors: Albiges Laurence , Voss Martin H , Rini Brian I. , Gravis Gwenaelle , Grimm Marc-Oliver , Nathan Paul D. , Bjarnason Georg A. , Tomita Yoshihiko , Penkov Konstantin , McGregor Bradley , Huang Bo , Thomaidou Despina , Mariani Mariangela , Di Pietro Alessandra , Choueiri Toni K. 
Published: June 2021

4514 Background: There are limited data on the outcomes of patients receiving second-line (2L) therapy following immunotherapies plus tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in the first-line (1L). We describe the outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) who had received 1L A + Ax in the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial and went on to receive subsequent Tx. Methods: At the cutoff date for the third interim analysis (April 28, 2020), patients who received 1L A + Ax (n = 442) and received any subsequent lines of Tx were assessed. We report the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival on next-line systemic therapy (PFS2) per type of Tx, and duration of 2L Tx. Results: Anticancer drug therapies were received by 204/442 patients following A + Ax Tx. Of patients who received a follow-up anticancer drug Tx, 163/204 received a single agent (SA), and 41/204 received a combination Tx (CT) regimen. The most common 2L SA was cabozantinib (60/163), and the most frequent 2L CT was everolimus + lenvatinib (12/41). OS, PFS2, and duration of treatment (DOT) for the various subgroups are summarized in the table below. Analyses on additional subgroups will also be presented. Conclusions: In patients with aRCC who received 2L CT following 1L treatment with A + Ax, long-term OS and PFS2 were observed. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006. [Table: see text]
Circulating tumor cell-driven use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Authors: Beije Nick , de Kruijff Ingeborg Elisabeth , de Jong Joep , Klaver Sjoerd O. , de Vries Peter , Jacobs Rens , Somford Diederik Meindert , te Slaa Ed , van der Heijden Toine , Witjes Johannes Alfred , Fossion Laurent , Boeve Egbert , van der Hoeven John , van Melick Harm H.E. , Wijburg Carl J , Martens John W.M. , De Wit Ronald , Kraan Jaco , Sleijfer Stefan , Boormans Joost L. 
Published: June 2021

4523 Background: International guidelines for the treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which, however, is underutilized in practice. We hypothesized that the absence of circulating tumour cells (CTCs), an established prognostic marker in MIBC, may identify patients with such a favourable prognosis that NAC may be withheld. Methods: The CirGuidance study included adults with clinical stage T2-T4aN0-N1M0 muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who were fit to undergo radical cystectomy. CTCs were enumerated using the CellSearch system. CTC-negative patients (no CTCs detectable) underwent radical surgery without NAC; CTC-positive patients (≥1 detectable CTCs) were advised to receive NAC followed by radical surgery, but NAC could be withheld at the discretion of the treating physician. The primary endpoint was the two-year overall survival (OS) in the CTC-negative group, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The prespecified criterion for trial success was a two-year OS of minimally 75% (95% confidence interval (CI) ±5%) in the CTC-negative group. Results: Of 315 patients screened for eligibility, 273 were enrolled in the study. The median age was 69 years; the median follow-up was 36 months. The two-year OS in the CTC-negative group was 69.5% (n = 203; 95% CI 62.6%-75.5%); in the CTC-positive group it was 58.2% (n = 70; 95% CI 45.5%-68.9%). CTC-positive patients had a higher rate of cancer-related mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.45, p = 0.03) and disease relapse (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.28-2.73, p = 0.001) than CTC-negative patients. Explorative analyses suggested that CTC-positive patients who had received NAC (n = 22) survived longer than CTC-positive patients who had not (n = 48), with a two-year OS of 74.8% (95%CI 49.5%-88.8%) versus 52.0% (95% CI 37.2%-65.0%), respectively. Conclusions: The two-year OS in the CTC-negative group did not meet the prespecified criterion for trial success. However, given the trial population’s advanced age and high rate of non-cancer related mortality, the benefit of NAC is likely to be limited in CTC-negative MIBC patients. CTC enumeration at the moment of diagnosis could aid in the decision to prescribe neoadjuvant chemotherapy for a muscle-invasive bladder cancer patient as a criterion in addition to clinical characteristics. Clinical trial information: NL3954.
Association between neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) and efficacy outcomes in the JAVELIN Renal 101 study.
Authors: Tucker Matthew D. , Voss Martin H , Choueiri Toni K. , Bilen Mehmet Asim , Grimm Marc-Oliver , Nathan Paul D. , Kollmannsberger Christian K. , Tomita Yoshihiko , Huang Bo , Thomaidou Despina , Mariani Mariangela , Di Pietro Alessandra , Rini Brian I. 
Published: June 2021

4549 Background: Baseline NER has been reported to be associated with outcomes of immuno-oncology based combination treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We report outcomes by baseline NER of patients with aRCC in the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial who received avelumab + axitinib (A + Ax) or sunitinib (S). Methods: We calculated the median NER (mNER) for patients in the A + Ax and the S arms at the data cutoff (April 20, 2020) for the 3rd interim analysis (IA3). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response (OR) by NER are reported. Multivariate Cox regression analyses of PFS and OS were also conducted. Results: At the IA3 cutoff date, the mNERs for the A + Ax arm (n = 383) and S arm (n = 396) were 29.2 and 27.0, respectively. OR, PFS and OS for both arms are summarized in the table below. Better observed treatment outcomes in OR (63.9% vs 55.2%) and median PFS (15.5 vs, 11.1 months) were observed for patients with a NER < median vs. NER ≥ median in the A + Ax arm, while there were not major differences in outcome based on NER in the S arm. The stratified hazard ratio (HR) for PFS in patients with a NER < median compared with those with a NER ≥ median in the A + Ax arm was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.630-1.035) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.728-1.181) in the S arm. Patients with a NER < median had improved OS compared with those with a NER ≥ median in the A + Ax arm (stratified HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.481-0.940) and the S arm (stratified HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.424-0.779). Multivariate analysis showed that a low NER was associated with longer PFS and OS by treating baseline NER as either a continuous variable or a binary variable (dichotomized by median). Conclusions: Baseline NER may be predictive of OR and PFS in aRCC patients treated with A + Ax, and prognostic for overall survival regardless of therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006. [Table: see text]
Analysis of two poor prognosis subgroups in ACIS evaluating apalutamide + abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (APA + AAP) versus placebo (PBO) + AAP in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Authors: Saad Fred , Efstathiou Eleni , Attard Gerhardt , Flaig Thomas W. , Franke Fabio , Goodman Oscar , Oudard Stephane , Steuber Thomas , Suzuki Hiroyoshi , Pieczonka Christopher Michael , Parnis Francis , Wu Daphne , Yeruva Kesav , De Porre Peter , Brookman-May Sabine Doris , Li Susan , Li Jinhui , Mundle Suneel , McCarthy Sharon Anne , Rathkopf Dana E. ,   for the ACIS Investigators
Published: June 2021

5037 Background: In the double-blind PBO-controlled ACIS study, investigator-assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was significantly improved with APA + AAP vs PBO + AAP in chemo-naive mCRPC, with no significant new safety signals (Rathkopf ASCO GU 2021). Among prespecified subgroups, efficacy and safety were explored in two difficult to treat subgroups: pts with visceral disease (VD; liver, lung, and/or adrenal gland metastasis) or age ≥ 75 y. Methods: Pts with mCRPC with ongoing ADT and no prior life-prolonging treatment were randomized 1:1 to APA (240 mg QD) + AA (1000 mg QD) + P (5 mg BID) or PBO + AAP. Stratified: presence or absence of VD, ECOG PS 0 or 1, geographic region. Primary end point: rPFS (randomization to radiographic progression or death); secondary end points: overall survival (OS), time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy, time to chronic opioid use, time to pain progression, safety. Results: 982 pts enrolled. 14.6% had VD and 35.9% were ≥ 75 y. Median rPFS, OS, and time to pain progression favored APA + AAP vs AAP (HR < 1) in both subgroups (Table). For pts ≥ 75 y, rPFS and OS were ≥ 7 mo longer with APA + AAP. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar (all > 94%) in pts with VD, ≥ 75 y, and overall safety population; hypertension was more frequent with APA + AAP vs AAP mainly in pts ≥ 75 y (31.7% vs 17.6%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs (APA + AAP vs AAP): VD, 60.8%, n = 74 vs 48.5%, n = 68; ≥ 75 y, 71.5%, n = 186 vs 68.5%, n = 165; overall, 63.3%, n = 490 vs 56.2%, n = 489. TEAEs leading to discontinuation: VD, 17.6% vs 5.9%; ≥ 75 y, 26.3% vs 20.6%; overall, 16.9% vs 12.5%. TEAEs leading to death: VD, 6.8% vs 5.9%; ≥ 75 y, 5.4% vs 13.9%; overall, 3.5% vs 7.6%. Conclusions: In this analysis of two difficult to treat subgroups, addition of APA to AAP favored rPFS and OS. Safety, while generally consistent with the overall population, showed higher hypertension rate in ≥ 75 y and TEAEs leading to discontinuation in VD. Clinical trial information: NCT02257736. [Table: see text]
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported outcomes at final analysis of the TITAN study of apalutamide (APA) versus placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).
Authors: Agarwal Neeraj , Chowdhury Simon , Bjartell Anders , Chung Byung Ha , Pereira de Santana Gomes Andrea Juliana , Given Robert , Juárez Álvaro , Merseburger Axel Stuart , Ozguroglu Mustafa , Uemura Hirotsugu , Ye Dingwei , Brookman-May Sabine Doris , Mundle Suneel , McCarthy Sharon Anne , Lefresne Florence , Dibaj Shiva , Bevans Katherine B. , Chi Kim N. ,   for the TITAN investigators
Published: June 2021

5068 Background: The phase 3 TITAN study evaluated APA vs PBO in pts with mCSPC receiving ADT. At primary analysis with 22.7 mo median follow-up, APA significantly improved overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival vs PBO (Chi NEJM 2019) while preserving HRQoL (Agarwal Lancet Oncol 2019). The study was unblinded; pts on PBO were allowed to cross over to APA. At final analysis with 44 mo median follow-up, APA significantly improved OS vs PBO, reducing risk of death by 35% despite crossover (Chi ASCO GU 2021). We evaluated HRQoL and treatment bother at final analysis. Methods: mCSPC pts (N = 1052) were randomized 1:1 to APA (240 mg QD; n = 525) or PBO (n = 527). All pts received ADT. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P). BPI was completed for 7d consecutively (Days -6 to 1 of each 28-d cycle [C]) through end of treatment (EOT). FACT-P was completed at baseline (BL), C2-C7, then every other C through EOT. Mean scores were reported by treatment group and over time. Time to deterioration on BPI and FACT-P scores was calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups by fitting proportional hazards regression models. Results: Of eligible pts per C, > 62% completed BPI through C32 and > 50% completed FACT-P through C31. Pts were relatively asymptomatic with good BL HRQoL: on 0-10 worst pain severity scale (BPI), median scores were 1.1 (APA) and 1.0 (PBO); on 0-156 HRQoL scale (FACT-P total; higher score = better HRQoL), median scores were 113.0 (APA) and 113.3 (PBO). Low BL BPI scores remained stable over time in both groups. On average, favorable BL FACT-P scores did not notably worsen over time in APA or PBO groups. There were no significant differences between groups in median time to deterioration in any BPI or FACT-P scores (Table). At each C at least 86% (APA) and 85% (PBO) of pts were either “not at all” or “a little bit” bothered by side effects. At BL, 76% (APA) and 72% (PBO) had favorable energy levels (reporting lack of energy “not at all” or “a little bit”). Energy levels remained stable or improved at each C for > 78% (APA) and > 71% (PBO) of pts. Conclusions: In the final analysis of TITAN, survival benefit with addition of APA to ADT was achieved without significant patient-reported side effect burden or reduced HRQoL compared with PBO in pts with mCSPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02489318. [Table: see text]
Darolutamide (DARO) tolerability from extended follow up and treatment response in the phase 3 ARAMIS trial.
Authors: Fizazi Karim , Shore Neal D. , Smith Matthew Raymond , Tammela Teuvo , Pieczonka Christopher Michael , Aragon-Ching Jeanny B. , Morris David , Le Berre Marie-Aude , Srinivasan Shankar , Petrenciuc Oana , Zurth Christian , Kuss Iris 
Published: June 2021

5079 Background: Patients (pts) with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) need therapy that prolongs survival with little added toxicity, thus preserving quality of life. The second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) including DARO, apalutamide, and enzalutamide offer durable survival in nmCRPC but differences exist in AE profiles (eg, fatigue, falls, fractures, rash, mental impairment, and hypertension) that can limit daily activities. These AEs may require dose modifications and limit pts’ willingness to continue treatment, with an adverse impact on efficacy. DARO is a structurally distinct ARI that significantly extended metastasis-free survival and overall survival (OS) vs placebo (PBO) in ARAMIS (NCT02200614), with minimal AE risk. We report tolerability from extended follow-up and treatment response analyses from ARAMIS. Methods: Pts with nmCRPC (N=1509) were randomized 2:1 to DARO or PBO with androgen deprivation therapy. The ARAMIS trial was unblinded at the primary analysis, after which all pts could receive open-label (OL) DARO. Tolerability was assessed every 16 weeks. Pharmacodynamic modeling investigated the association between treatment response (maximum prostate-specific antigen [PSA] decline from baseline) and OS at 2 years using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: As shown in the table, DARO remained well tolerated over the double-blind (DB) and OL periods: 98.8% of pts on DARO received the full planned dose and almost all pts with dose modifications were able to resume and re-establish the planned dose (DARO 89.6% vs PBO 89.7%). Discontinuation of DARO due to AEs increased slightly from the DB period (9.0%) to the DB+OL period (10.5%). Pharmacodynamic modeling showed that longer OS was positively associated with maximum PSA decline in DARO-treated pts. Conclusions: DARO remained well tolerated with extended treatment at the recommended dose of 600 mg twice daily. Almost all pts with nmCRPC were able to receive the full planned dose, increasing the likelihood of clinical benefit from effective disease control (PSA decline) and prolonged survival. Tolerability of different ARIs in the real world should be assessed. Clinical trial information: NCT02200614. [Table: see text]
Cardiac safety of dual anti-HER2 blockade with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (P+T) in the APHINITY trial.
Authors: de Azambuja Evandro , Eiger Daniel , Procter Marion Jennifer , Ponde Noam Falbel , Guillaume Sebastien , Parlier Damien , Lambertini Matteo , Desmet Antoine , Caballero Carmela Aves , Aguila Christian , Jerusalem Guy Heinrich Maria , Walshe Janice Maria , Frank Elizabeth S. , Bines Jose , Loibl Sibylle , Piccart-Gebhart Martine J. , Ewer Michael S. , Dent Susan Faye , Plummer Chris , Suter Thomas M 
Published: June 2021

510 Background: Trastuzumab (T) increases the incidence of cardiac events (CEs) in patients (pts) with early breast cancer (BC). Dual blockade with P+T improves BC outcomes and is the standard of care for high-risk HER2-positive BC pts following the phase 3 APHINITY trial that evaluated the addition of P or placebo (Pla) to T and chemotherapy (CT). We analyzed the cardiac safety of P+T in APHINITY. Methods: APHINITY eligibility required a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55% at study entry. LVEF assessment was performed every 3 months (mos) during treatment, every 6 mos up to month 36, and yearly thereafter. Primary CE was defined as heart failure (HF) class III/IV and a significant decrease in LVEF of at least 10 percentage points from baseline and to <50%, or cardiac death. Secondary CE was defined as a confirmed significant decrease in LVEF or CEs confirmed by the cardiac advisory board. Results: The safety analysis population consists of 4,769 pts. With 74 mos median follow-up (FU), CEs were observed in 159 pts (3.3%): 83 (3.5%) in the P+T and 76 (3.2%) in Pla+T arms, respectively. Most CEs occurred during anti-HER2 therapy: 123/159 (77.4%) and were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic LVEF decrease (133/159; 83.6%) (Table 1). There were 2 cardiac deaths in each arm (0.1%). More CEs occurred in pts receiving an anthracycline-based CT compared to those receiving non-anthracycline CT (139 vs. 20 CEs, respectively). Acute recovery from a CE based on subsequent LVEF values was observed in 127/155 pts (81.9%). Conclusions: Dual blockade with P+T does not increase the risk of CE compared to Pla+T alone. The use of anthracycline-based CT increases the risk of a CE; hence non-anthracycline CT may be considered particularly in pts with other cardiovascular risk factors. Clinical trial information: NCT01358877. [Table: see text]
Discovery and validation of a genomic signature to identify women with early-stage invasive breast cancer who may safely omit adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.
Authors: Sjöström Martin , Chang S. Laura , Hartman Linda , Holmberg Erik , Feng Felix Y , Speers Corey Wayne , Pierce Lori J. , Malmström Per , Fernö Mårten , Karlsson Per 
Published: June 2021

512 Background: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is currently the standard of care for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer (BC) treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS). However, some women may have very low risk of recurrence and could safely be spared RT. This study aimed to identify these women using a molecularly-based approach. Methods: We performed an analysis of the SweBCG91-RT cohort, a trial randomizing women with node-negative stage I-II invasive BC +/- RT following breast conserving surgery, with sparse use of adjuvant systemic therapy. Only patients with ER+, HER2- tumors, and not treated with adjuvant systemic therapy, were included in this analysis. Transcriptome-wide profiling of tumors was performed using the Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0 ST microarray. The SweBCG91-RT cohort was divided into a training cohort of 243 patients and a validation cohort of 354 patients. Biological gene sets and individual genes related to locoregional recurrence in patients not receiving RT of the training set were identified, and a 16-gene signature was trained using elastic net regression. The signature, named Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiation (POLAR), was locked prior to validation. Results: In the validation cohort, POLAR was prognostic for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients not treated with RT (multivariable Cox model adjusting for age, grade, tumor size, and luminal A vs luminal B: HR = 1.7 [1.2,2.3], p < 0.001). Patients categorized as POLAR low-risk had a 10-year locoregional recurrence rate of 7% in the absence of RT. Notably, there was no significant benefit from RT for these POLAR low-risk patients (HR = 1.1 [0.38,3.3], p = 0.83), whereas patients categorized as POLAR high-risk had a significant decreased risk of locoregional recurrence when treated with RT (recurrence rate without RT at 10-years 19%, HR = 0.43 [0.24,0.78], p = 0.0053). Conclusions: These data suggest that the novel POLAR genomic signature based on LRR biology can not only identify patients who have a low risk of LRR without adjuvant RT after BCS but who also would not benefit from RT, thus being prime candidates for RT omission.