bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A phase Ib study of proxalutamide (GT0918) in women with androgen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Authors: Li Huiping , Jiang Hanfang , Yin Yongmei , Tong Zhongsheng , Ouyang Quchang , Shen Kunwei , Yuan Zhongyu , Geng Cuizhi , Ran Ran , Zhang Ruyan , Liu Ya-Xin , Zhang Jiayang , Li Wei , Qu Qing , Zhou Qiaoxia , Dong Xunwei , Meng Luping , Zhu Xiaoyan , Yi Zhen , Tong Youzhi 
Published: June 2021

1019 Background: Androgen receptor (AR) is an emerging prognostic marker and therapeutic target in breast cancer. AR is expressed in 60% to 80% of breast cancers. Recent studies have shown the association between AR signaling and tumor carcinogenesis in breast cancer, suggesting AR pathway as a potential target for breast cancer treatment. However, no AR targeting therapies have been approved for treating breast cancer. GT0918 is a new chemical entity of AR antagonist with possible AR down-regulation. We had finished the phase I study and submitted the paper. Here we present a multicenter, open-label phase Ib trial assessing the safety and efficacy of GT0918 in women with AR positive metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of GT0918. The secondary objectives are to assess its safety and to explore the relevant biomarkers. Methods: This is an expansion study of a phase I dose-escalation trial. In this phase Ib study, only patients with AR positive metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. All eligibled patients would take GT0918 orally once a day, of a 28 -day cycle. After 2 cycles’ safety and tolerability assessment, patients could choose to continue their treatment until they experience disease progression, intolerable toxicities, death, or withdrew consent. The primary efficacy endpoints were 8-week disease control rate (DCR) and 16-week DCR. The secondary efficacy endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Results: In total, 45 patients were enrolled in the study at 200mg (n = 30) and 300mg (n = 15) doses. The most common (≥10%) treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were asthenia (42.2%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (26.7%), blood cholesterol increased(17.8%), alanine aminotransferase increased (17.8%), decreased appetite (17.8%), blood triglycerides increased (13.3%), blood lactate dehydrogenase increased (13.3%), anaemia (13.3%), blood alkaline phosphatase increased (11.1%), gamma-glutamyltransferase increased (11.1%), urinary tract infection (11.1%). Grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 9 patients (20%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The 8-week and 16-week DCR were both 22.2% (n = 10) (95% CI 10.08%, 34.37%). The median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI 1.8, 1.9) in all patients. 12 out of 45 (26.7%) were triple negative breast cancer cases. The median PFS was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.7, 9.1), 4 out of 12 patients (33.3%) > 6 months, 2 out of 12 patients (16.7%) > 9 months. Conclusions: GT0918 has been shown to be well tolerated and may provide potential clinical benefits to AR positive metastatic breast cancer patients. This study demonstrated triple negative in AR positive patients had more benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT04103853 .
Comparison of therapy benefit from standard anti-HER2 directed approaches in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) between initially HER2-positive patients and patients initially HER2-negative with switch to HER2-positive.
Authors: Kolberg Hans-Christian , Yüksel Özlem , Fasching Peter A. , Brucker Sara , Tesch Hans , Wallwiener Diethelm , Haeberle Lothar , Wallwiener Markus , Hadji Peyman , Fehm Tanja N. , Janni Wolfgang , Lüftner Diana , Lux Michael P , Ettl Johannes , Hartkopf Andreas D. , Müller Volkmar , Taran Florin-Andrei , Belleville Erik , Hein Alexander , Schneeweiss Andreas 
Published: June 2021

1040 Background: Metaanalyses have demonstrated that 5% of initially HER2 negative breast cancer patients switch to HER2 positive during the course of the disease. Whether there is a difference in benefit from standard HER2 targeted therapies between patients initially HER2 positive and patients switching from negative to positive is unclear. We used data from the PRAEGNANT registry to compare the outcome of those patients. Methods: PRAEGNANT is a prospective advanced breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) focusing on molecular biomarkers. Patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment are eligible. This analysis compared progression-free survival (PFS) with standard HER2 targeted therapies between patients with tumors initially HER2 negative and switched to HER2 positive and patients with tumors that were initially HER2 positive adjusted for age and hormone receptor status. Results: At the time of this analysis 4061 patients with MBC were included in the PRAEGNANT registry, 49 of which met the requirements for this analysis. Median age was 56 (IQR 48-64) years and 87.8% of the patients were hormone receptor positive. At first diagnosis 15 patients were HER2 negative and 34 patients were HER2 positive. Within a median observation time of 9 months (95%CI: 3.8, 23.7) 35 PFS events occurred. Median observation time was 9 months (95% CI: 3.8, 23.7). Initially HER2 positive patients had a longer progression-free survival (HR = 0.49, 95% CI (0.24, 1.03), p = 0.07) as compared to initially HER2 negative patients switched to HER2 positive. The 1- and 2-year-PFS rates were also higher for patients initially HER2 positive: 1-year-PFS: 52% (95% CI: 36%, 73%) versus 26 % (95% CI: 12%, 52%); 2-year-PFS: 44% (95% CI: 29%, 67%) versus 19% (95% CI: 7%, 50%). Conclusions: Median PFS and 1- and 2-year PFS rate seem to be better in patients HER2 positive at initial diagnosis receiving standard HER2 directed therapies. Although our result has to be interpreted with caution because of the small cohort and the retrospective nature of our analysis, it justifies prospective research including the group of initially HER2 negative patients switched to HER2 positive as a distinct entity. Clinical trial information: NCT02338167 .
Analysis of real-world (RW) data for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients (pts) with somatic BRCA1/2 (sBRCA) or other homologous recombination (HR)-pathway gene mutations (muts) treated with PARP inhibitors (PARPi).
Authors: Batalini Felipe , Madison Russell , Pavlick Dean C. , Sokol Ethan , Snow Tamara , Sondhi Arjun , Frampton Garrett M. , Jenkins Colby , Garber Judy Ellen , Wulf Gerburg M. , Venstrom Jeffrey Michael , Tung Nadine M. , Castellanos Emily , Schrock Alexa Betzig , McGregor Kimberly 
Published: June 2021

10512 Background: PARPi are approved for treatment of pts w/ HER2-negative mBC and germline BRCA1/2 (g BRCA) pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (muts); however, clinical benefit has also been demonstrated in mBC pts w/ sBRCA or other HR-pathway gene muts. Using a RW Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB), we assessed outcomes for pts w/ gBRCA muts compared to pts w/ either s BRCA or other HR-pathway muts treated w/ PARPi. Methods: 6,329 mBC pts from ̃280 US cancer clinics were included in the Flatiron Health (FH) -Foundation Medicine (FM) CGDB, which includes comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) linked to de-identified, electronic health record (EHR)-derived clinical data. Eligible pts had mBC, received care in the FH network from 1/1/2011-9/1/2020, and had tissue CGP by FM. Pts classified as gBRCA: positive germline result in EHR and BRCA mut predicted germline per FM’s somatic, germline, zygosity algorithm (SGZ) (Sun et al PMID 29415044). Non-g BRCA: negative germline results in EHR and a somatic BRCA (s BRCA) mut per SGZ or BRCA wild-type w/ another HR mut per CGP result. Pts w/o a documented gBRCA result in EHR, unknown FM BRCA SGZ result, or conflicting results were excluded. RW overall survival (rwOS) and RW progression-free survival (rwPFS) from start of PARPi for pts w/ gBRCA and non- gBRCA mBC were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression adjusted for mBC line number, prior platinum, age at PARPi initiation, race, and receptor status. Results: Among pts who received PARPi in the mBC setting, 44 had gBRCA and 18 had non -gBRCA: 9 s BRCA (5 BRCA1, 4 BRCA2), 4 PALB2, 2 ATM, and 1 each of ATM+CDK12, BARD1+FANCF+RAD54L, and CHEK2. Of HR muts 76% were confirmed biallelic: 33/44 gBRCA (11 unknown), 8/9 sBRCA, 3/4 PALB2, and 3/5 other (1 unknown). Neither median rwPFS nor rwOS from start of PARPi were significantly different between the non-g BRCA and g BRCA cohorts (rwPFS: 7.0 [4.6-11.3] vs 5.5 [4.3-7.2] months (mos), aHR: 1.19 [0.57 – 2.43]; rwOS: 15.0 [7.95-16.3] vs 11.5 [9.46-NA] mos, aHR: 0.85 [0.36-1.98]). For 9 pts w/ sBRCA mut, median rwPFS was 7.1 mos (range 1.4-12.4) and all pts had progressed by data cut off. Conclusions: Despite small pt numbers and limitations from RW data, our results suggest that pts w/ biallelic non-g BRCA mBC may derive similar benefit from PARPi when tumor CGP detects a s BRCA mut or germline or somatic mut in other HR-pathway genes. These findings are consistent w/ the results from TBCRC-048 (Tung et al PMID 33119476) and support further randomized trials exploring the efficacy of PARPi in this population.[Table: see text]
The marginal diagnostic benefit of pancreatic cancer molecular profiling after germline testing.
Authors: Walker Evan Justin , Blanco Amie , Carnevale Julia C. , Cinar Pelin , Collisson Eric Andrew , Tempero Margaret A. , Ko Andrew H. 
Published: June 2021

10513 Background: Germline genetic testing is now universally recommended for patients (pts) with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) for purposes of both familial screening and therapeutic guidance. Treatment selection can be further informed by tumor molecular profiling (TMP) to identify targetable somatic alterations in pts with advanced disease, but this is inconsistently applied. Determination of the rate of actionable findings identified with TMP after germline testing, which we term marginal diagnostic benefit, may inform practice patterns and workflow in this patient population. Methods: This retrospective analysis included all pts with PDAC who underwent germline testing and TMP at UCSF over a 4-yr period. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, disease-specific data, and germline testing/TMP clinical reports. Alterations classified as ‘pathogenic’ or ‘likely pathogenic’ were included, and were deemed ‘actionable’ if there was clinical or preclinical evidence of benefit from targeted therapy in any cancer, as previously described. Results: From 1/2016-1/2020, 144/738 (20%) UCSF pts with PDAC completed both germline testing and TMP. Germline testing identified actionable pathogenic alterations in 10 (7%). TMP confirmed 8/10 of these alterations and identified 3 additional therapeutic targets. Among the 134 pts without actionable germline findings, TMP identified 45 new therapeutic targets in 41 (31%) pts, increasing the overall rate of actionable findings from 7% to 35%. Most (35/58, 60%) actionable alterations involved genes associated with the Homologous Recombination DNA Damage Repair (HR-DDR) pathway (Table). 80% of pts with HR-DDR pathway alterations (9/10 germline, 19/25 somatic) received platinum-based chemotherapy. Four pts were treated with targeted therapy based on test results: PARP-inhibitor (n = 2, germline BRCA1 and PALB2 mutations), PARP-inhibitor + ATR inhibitor (n = 1, somatic ARID1A mutation) and mTOR inhibitor (n = 1, somatic STK11 deletion). Conclusions: In this analysis, PDAC TMP after germline testing increased the detection of actionable alterations (the marginal diagnostic benefit) by five-fold. As more somatic tumor alterations become actionable with the development of targeted therapeutics, TMP is a necessary complement to germline testing to fully inform personalized treatment decisions for all pts with PDAC.[Table: see text]
Breast cancer ER, PR, and HER2 expression variance by germline cancer predisposition genes.
Authors: Wei Grace , Rosa Marilin , Chang Maxine , Czerniecki Brian J. , Wang Xia 
Published: June 2021

10526 Background: The association between breast cancer characteristics and survival with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression has been primarily studied via binomial categories, ER-positive and ER-negative. In order to better characterize germline genetic influences on these markers, we investigated their IHC expression semi-quantitatively in cancer predisposition germline pathogenic variant (PV) carriers of the following genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, TP53, PTEN, CDH1, ATM, CHEK2, and Lynch syndrome genes. The HER2 expression was also analyzed. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with germline panel genetic testing for cancer predisposition genes at Moffitt Cancer Center’s GeneHome clinic. Inclusion criteria included 1) women ≥18 years old, 2) breast cancer diagnosis, 3) cancer predisposition germline panel genetic test results, 4) available ER and PR expression levels, and 5) available HER expression and/or amplification status. ER, PR, and HER2 status were compared between PV carriers and non-PV carriers via Mann-Whitney U at p>0.05. Results: A total of 847 cases were reviewed for the study. Among 658 patients with a breast cancer diagnosis and complete ER PR data, 365 cases (55.5%) were non-PV carriers and 293 cases (44.5%) carried a PV in at least one of the genes listed above. Among 635 cases with available HER2 expression/amplification status, 355 (55.9%) cases were non-PV carriers and 288 (45.4%) cases were PV-carriers. When compared with non-PV carrier controls, BRCA1 PV carriers’ breast tumors had significantly lower ER and/or PR expression. Further, BRCA2 and TP53 PV tumors also displayed moderately lower ER expression. Contrarily, CHEK2 tumors displayed higher ER and PR expression compared to controls. Further, BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers were more likely to have HER2- breast cancers. Conclusions: Differences in ER, PR, HER2 expression levels were observed in germline PV carrier breast cancers, signaling differential impacts by germline PVs on the tumor evolution process. It is likely that tumor differences in PV carriers influence responses to therapies, including hormone therapy, anti-HER2 therapy, and subsequent survival.[Table: see text]
Differential effects of the 2015 American Cancer Society guidelines on screening mammography exams based on socioeconomic status.
Authors: Capaccione Kathleen M. , Huang Sophia , West Elizabeth , Deng Aileen , Salvatore Mary M. , Desperito Elise 
Published: June 2021

10539 Background: Guidelines for screening mammography have changed several times since initiation of regular screening mammography in the 1970’s. Most recently, in 2015, the American Cancer Society (ACS) revised their screening guidelines, recommending that a patient discuss screening mammography with her primary care doctor (PCP) between the ages of 40-44 and should begin yearly screening at age 45; after age 54, ACS recommended screening every other year. Prior to this, from 2003-2015, ACS had recommended screening mammography every year beginning at the age of 40. We hypothesized that these guidelines were adopted to varying degrees in different patient populations and may have disproportionately reduced screening mammography utilization in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Methods: Here, we analyzed monthly screening mammography rates over time in two large New York City hospitals, one in a socioeconomically advantaged area and the other in a socioeconomically disadvantaged area. Using our radiology records query system, we searched for monthly screening mammography numbers for women by decade from 2012 to 2018. We performed statistical analysis to evaluate changes in number of exams over time. Student’s t-tests were used to evaluate for significant differences. Results: In both groups of 40-49 year old patients, monthly mammograms increased from 2012-2016. In the socioeconomically advantaged group, this increase continued until 2018 resulting in an overall 400% increase in screening mammograms over time. The change in ACS screening guidelines had no effect on the rate of screening mammography in this group. Conversely, after the revision of the ACS guidelines in 2015, there was a marked decline in screening mammography in the 40-49 year old group in the socioeconomically disadvantaged population. By 2018, there was a statistically significant difference in women screened in all age groups (40-49, p<.0001; 50-59, p<.0001; 60-69, p<.01; 70-79, p<.0001; 80+, p<.0001) between these two patient populations. Conclusions: These data suggest that implementation of the 2015 ACS screening guidelines had a disproportionate effect on patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas and that these effects have led to significant disparities in screening mammography trends over time. We postulate that lower levels of health literacy may have contributed to misunderstanding of the screening guidelines. More research is needed to elucidate the underlying etiology of these disparities and ensure that women from all socioeconomic backgrounds receive appropriate screening mammography. Over time, this may result in disproportionate breast cancer morbidity and mortality in populations not receiving appropriate screening.
Risk factors for early-onset colorectal cancer in China.
Authors: Pan Zhe , Huang Junfeng , Huang Mingkai , Yao Zhiyuan , Huang Jiongqiang , Chen Jingsong , Wang Rongchang 
Published: June 2021

10542 Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer among persons aged < 50 years (early-onset colorectal cancer, EOCRC) has increased since the early 1990s. However, the risk factors contributing to this trend remain largely unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of participants who were aged < 50 years and without a previous cancer history, using the China Kadoorie Biobank cohort study. We analyzed data related to demographics, lifestyle habits, family history, and comorbidities of EOCRC cases with participants without colorectal cancer in this age group (controls). Univariate and multivariate-adjusted cox regression models were used to estimate the associations with risk factors. Results: We identified 225 EOCRC cases and 88842 controls that include the final analyses. Of the 225 EOCRC patients, 105 (46.7%) were colon cancers and 120 (53.3%) were rectum cancers. EOCRC cases were older, have more intake of fish and eggs, have higher BMIs, diabetes, and family history of cancer compared with controls (P < 0.05). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, increasing age (HR 2.18, 95%CI 2.05-2.31), BMI (HR 1.06, 95%CI 1.01-1.11), family history of cancer (HR 1.41, 95%CI 1.00-1.98), and more intake of fish (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.09-2.19) were significantly associated with a higher risk of EOCRC. In sensitivity analyses stratified by cancer site (colon and rectum), the results remained consistent. Conclusions: Based on the large Chinese cohort study, we found increasing age, higher BMI or obesity, family history of cancer, and more intake of fish were independent risk factors for EOCRC. Further studies are needed to identify factors that cause the increasing incidence of EOCRC in China and other countries, and explore the potential mechanism behind.[Table: see text]
Efficacy of HPV vaccination among seropositive, DNA negative cohorts.
Authors: Mac Eochagain Colm , Power Robert , Parker Imelda 
Published: June 2021

10552 Background: Prophylactic HPV vaccination of naïve cohorts is known to be highly effective in the prevention of incident HPV infection and HPV-associated cervical premalignancy. Conversely, vaccination of women with active (DNA+) HPV infections has been demonstrated to be ineffective. Vaccine efficacy among previously exposed, but currently uninfected women, i.e. those who have serological evidence of a prior HPV infection without corresponding detectable HPV DNA, remains incompletely defined. This meta-analysis assessed the serotype-specific efficacy of prophylactic HPV vaccination against HPV16/18 persistent infection (PI) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among seropositive, DNA negative (SPDN) women enrolled to RCTs of HPV L1-based vaccines. Methods: The study protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020206888). Searches were conducted on 08/16/20 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and CENTRAL. RCTs of L1-based prophylactic bivalent or quadrivalent HPV vaccines, reporting serotype-specific clinical efficacy endpoints in the HPV16/18 seropositive, DNA-negative populations were included. Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed for bias. Data for SPDN women were extracted from subgroup analyses within primary and secondary publications, publication supplements, and manufacturers' clinical study reports. Relative risks (RR) of 6-month persistent infection (6mPI), 12-month persistent infection (12mPI), CIN1+ and CIN2+ were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 1727 citations were reviewed. 8 studies, with a total of 9569 SPDN participants, met all eligibility criteria. The relative risk of 6mPI (RR: 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.61, p = 0.018), 12mPI (RR: 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.80, p = 0.035), CIN1+ (RR:0.13, 95% CI 0.05-0.30, p = 0.003) and CIN2+ (RR: 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.59, p = 0.022) was significantly reduced in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated group. The number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one case of CIN1+ and CIN2+ was 152 and 208 respectively. Conclusions: Our findings suggest high serotype-specific efficacy for HPV vaccination among cohorts of women with evidence of prior HPV 16/18 infections. Women without DNA evidence of active infection may be seronegative, implying naïve status and > 99% efficacy; or seropositive, implying SPDN status and 87% efficacy against CIN1+ for HPV 16/18. Women without DNA evidence of HPV 16/18 infection should be offered prophylactic HPV vaccination regardless of prior exposure history.