Recruitment of Young Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men for a Web-Based Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Intervention: Differences in Participant Characteristics and Study Engagement by Recruitment Source in a Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)
Authors: Marshall Daniel J , Gower Amy L , Katz Mira L , Bauermeister José A , Shoben Abigail B , Reiter Paul L 
Published: January 2025

BACKGROUND

Young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men have been referred to as a “hard-to-reach” or “hidden” community in terms of recruiting for research studies. With widespread internet use among this group and young adults in general, web-based avenues represent an important approach for reaching and recruiting members of this community. However, little is known about how participants recruited from various web-based sources may differ from one another.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine how young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men recruited from various web-based sources differ from one another in terms of participant characteristics and study engagement.

METHODS

Data were collected as part of a randomized controlled trial of Outsmart HPV, a web-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination intervention for young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. From 2019 to 2021, we recruited young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in the United States who were aged 18-25 years and not vaccinated against HPV (n=1227) through various web-based avenues. We classified each participant as being recruited from either (1) social media (eg, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat), (2) a dating app (eg, Grindr, Scruff), or (3) some other digital recruitment source (eg, existing research panel, university-based organization). Analyses compared participants from these 3 groups on demographic and health-related characteristics and metrics involving study engagement.

RESULTS

Most demographic and health-related characteristics differed by web-based recruitment source, including race or ethnicity (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), relationship status (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), education level (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), employment status (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), sexual self-identity (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), health insurance status (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), disclosure of sexual orientation (<i>P</i>=.048), and connectedness to the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) community (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) The type of device used by participants during study enrollment also differed across groups, with smartphone use higher among participants recruited via dating apps (n=660, 96.6%) compared to those recruited via social media (n=318, 78.9%) or other digital sources (n=85, 60.3%; <i>P</i>&lt;.001). Participants recruited via social media were more likely than those recruited via dating apps to complete follow-up surveys at 3 different timepoints (odds ratios 1.52-2.09, <i>P</i>=.001-.008). These participants also spent a longer amount of time viewing intervention content about HPV vaccination (3.14 minutes vs 2.67 minutes; <i>P</i>=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to recruit a large national sample of young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men for a web-based HPV vaccination intervention via multiple methodologies. Participants differed on a range of demographic and health-related characteristics, as well as metrics related to study engagement, based on whether they were recruited from social media, a dating app, or some other digital recruitment source. Findings highlight key issues and considerations that can help researchers better plan and customize future web-based recruitment efforts of young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.

CLINICALTRIAL

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04032106; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04032106

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-10.2196/16294