bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
P041: Point-of-care ultrasound utilization and monetary outcomes (POCUMON) study
Authors: Rusiecki D. , Douglas S. , Bell C. 
Published: May 2020

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an integral tool in the modern emergency physician's toolkit. Evidence suggests many imaging and lab investigations are ordered without true medical indications; it is unknown how POCUS utilization impacts health care costs at a patient level. The purpose of this study was to assess whether POCUS use in the emergency department (ED) was associated with cost savings via decreased laboratory and radiographic testing. Methods: POCUMON is a single-center, prospective pilot study. The participants were a convenience sample of ED staff physicians and PGY-5 Emergency Medicine (EM) residents working in the ED from July-October 2019. Physicians who used POCUS as part of their assessment had the cost of their patient investigation plans compared with those proposed by a control group of ED physicians simultaneously on-shift. The control group was blinded to the POCUS findings but had access to the patient and medical record. The lab investigations and imaging studies ordered by both groups were recorded with respective costs. Data were analyzed using a paired T-test, with sub-group analyses. Ethics approval was obtained from the Queen's University HSREB (No.6026732). Results: 50 patient assessments using POCUS were captured in the study period. 76% of patient assessments were performed by EM staff physicians; 94% of control assessments were provided by EM staff physicians. Patient chief complaints included abdominal pain (7), chest pain/dyspnea (10), flank pain (3), pregnancy concerns (4), trauma (7), extremity complaints (4), back pain (3), and other (12). The POCUS group had a trend for lower number of laboratory tests (4.7 ± 0.44 vs 5.22 ± 0.39; p = 0.28) and imaging studies (0.94 ± 0.14 vs 1.1 ± 0.11; p = 0.33). Overall health care costs were similar in both groups, with a trend to cost savings in the POCUS group ($142.00 ± 15.44 vs $174.60 ± 17.00; p = 0.12). Subgrouping identified significant cost savings in the POCUS group for patients with a chief complaint of flank pain ($43.64 vs $248.82, p = 0.01). Conclusion: POCUS use was not associated with significant health care cost savings. ED POCUS usage did see a trend towards decreased laboratory and imaging investigations. Patients presenting with flank pain had significantly lower expenditures associated with their visit when POCUS was incorporated into their assessment. Large scale prospective studies are needed to investigate if POCUS is associated with cost-savings in ED patients.
P046: Physicians experience with the Epic electronic health record system: findings from an academic emergency department implementation
Authors: Price C. , Calder-Sprackman S. , Cheung W. , Clapham G. , Kwok E. 
Published: May 2020

Introduction: In June 2019, The Ottawa Hospital launched the Epic EHR system, which transitioned all departments from a primarily paper-based system to an exclusively electronic system using a one-day “big bang” approach. All Emergency Physicians (EP) received online module training, personalization sessions, and at-the-elbow support during the transition. We sought to evaluate EP satisfaction with the implementation process and the system's impact on clinical practice in a tertiary care academic emergency medicine setting. Methods: Email surveys were distributed during the pre-implementation and go-live phases. Questions were developed by the research team and piloted for face validity and clarity. Surveys were sent to staff EPs, residents and fellows. Likert scales were used to evaluate agreement with statements and the modified Maslach Burnout Inventory was used to assess burnout. Pre-post groups were compared using chi-squared tests to assess for significant differences. Future surveys will be distributed in 2020 for continued implementation evaluation. Results: Response rates were 49% (78/160) in the pre and 48% (76/160) in the post period. The majority of respondents were staff (66% pre; 75% post) working 8-15 shifts/month. Prior to launch, 52% of EPs felt the pre-training modules provided sufficient preparation, however only 32% felt this way after go-live (p = 0.02). Providers did not feel there were enough personalization (21% pre vs. 24% post, p = 0.66) or hands-on sessions offered (51% pre vs. 39% post, p = 0.15) and this opinion did not change after go-live. Before Epic, EPs were most concerned with productivity/efficiency, documentation time, and lack of support/training. Although documentation was reported to be easier after go-live by 69% of EPs, reviewing documents, using standardized workups/protocols, patient monitoring/follow-up, efficiency and billing were reported by >50% of EPs to be more difficult. Overall, there was a 22% increase in feeling confident to use Epic (28% pre vs. 50% post, p < 0.01); however, only 38% of providers were satisfied with the system. Notably, 82% of EPs reported experiencing moderate or high burnout in the post implementation period. Conclusion: Despite receiving standard EHR training and support, the majority of clinicians did not feel adequately trained or confident using Epic and reported moderate to high burnout. These findings will inform optimization efforts and they represent key considerations for other EDs planning future implementations.
P048: Brief online educational intervention improves emergency physicians’ and general surgeon's ability to interpret focused gallbladder ultrasound
Authors: Peng S. , Woo M. , Glen P. , Ritcey B. , Cheung W. , Kwok E. , Sheikh A. 
Published: May 2020

Introduction: Biliary colic is a frequent cause for emergency department visits. Ultrasound is the initial test of choice for gallstone disease. We evaluated the effectiveness of a brief online educational module aimed to improve Emergency Physicians’ (EP) and General Surgeons’ (GS) accuracy in interpreting gallbladder ultrasound. Methods: EPs and GSs (resident/fellow and attending) from a single academic tertiary care hospital were invited to participate in a pre- and post- assessment of the interpretation of gallbladder ultrasound. Demographic information was obtained in a standardized survey. All questions developed for the pre- and post- assessment were reviewed for content and clarity by 3 EP and GS experts. Participants were asked 22 multiple-choice questions and then directed to a 7-minute video-tutorial on gallbladder ultrasound interpretation. After a 3-week period, participants then completed a post-intervention assessment. Following pre- and post- assessment, participants were surveyed on their confidence in gallbladder ultrasound interpretation. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-test. Results: The overall response rate of the pre-intervention was 50.9% (116/228) and 40.8% (93/228) for the post-intervention. In pre-intervention assessment, 27.7% of participants reported they were “not at all confident” in interpreting gallbladder ultrasound. This contrasted with post-intervention confidence level, where only minority (7.8%) reported “not at all confident”. There was a significant increase from the pre- to post- intervention (75.7% to 85.4%; p < 0.01) in correct interpretations. The greatest improvement was seen in those with previous experience interpreting gallbladder ultrasound (from 79.6% to 91.1%; p < 0.01). EPs scored significantly higher than GSs in the pre-intervention (EPs 78.2% compared to GSs 71.0%; p < 0.01). This trend was also observed in post-intervention, although the difference was no longer significant (EPs 88.9% compared to GSs 82.8%; p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in performance between residents/fellows compared to attendings. Conclusion: This brief, online intervention improved the accuracy of EPs’ and GSs’ interpretation of gallbladder ultrasound. This is an easily accessible tutorial that can be used as part of a comprehensive ultrasound educational program. Further studies are required to determine if EPs’ and GSs’ interpretations of gallbladder ultrasound impacts patient-oriented outcomes.
P055: Canadian emergency physician attitudes toward endotracheal intubation for aspiration prophylaxis
Authors: Munn M. , Laraya J. , Boivin-Arcouette G. , van der Linde E. , Lund A. , Turris S. 
Published: May 2020

Introduction: Emergency patients with decreased level of consciousness often undergo intubation purely for airway protection from aspiration. However, the true risk of aspiration is unclear and intubation poses risks. Anecdotally, experienced emergency physicians often defer intubation in these patients while others intubate to decrease the perceived clinical and medico-legal consequences. No literature exists on the intubation practices of emergency physicians in these cases. Methods: An online questionnaire was circulated to members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Participants were asked questions regarding two common clinical cases with decreased level of consciousness : (1) acute, uncomplicated alcohol intoxication and (2) acute, uncomplicated seizure. For each case, providers’ perceptions of aspiration risk, the standard of care, and the need for intubation were assessed. Results: 128 of the 1546 Canadian physicians contacted (8.3%) provided responses. Respondents had a median of 15 years of experience, 88% had CCFP-EM or FRCPC certification, and most worked in urban centers. When intubating, 98% agreed they were competent and 90% agreed they were well supported. A minority (17.4%) considered GCS < 8 an independent indication for intubation. For the alcohol intoxication case, 88% agreed that aspiration risk was present but only 11% agreed they commonly intubate. Only 17% agreed intubation was standard care, and only 0.8% felt their colleagues always intubate such patients. For the seizure case, 65% agreed aspiration risk existed but only 3% agreed they commonly intubate, 1% felt colleagues always intubated, and 5% agreed intubation was standard of care. Additional factors felt to compel intubation (394 total) and support non-intubation (366 total) were compiled and categorized; the most common themes emerging were objective evidence of emesis or aspiration, other standard indications for intubation, head trauma, co-ingestions, co-morbidities and clinical instability. Conclusion: It is acceptable and standard practice to avoid intubating a select subset of intoxicated and post-seizure emergency department patients despite aspiration risk. Most physicians do not view the dogma of “GCS 8, intubate” as an absolute indication for intubation in these patients. Future research is aimed at identifying key factors and evidence supporting intubation for the prevention of aspiration, as well as the development of a validated clinical decision rule for common emergency presentations.
P056: Gastric ultrasound in stable patients with decreased level of consciousness and recreational substance use -- are presumed full stomachs full?
Authors: Munn M. , Phillips C. , Laraya J. , Boivin-Arcouette G. 
Published: May 2020

Introduction: Intoxicated patients with decreased Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) are common presentations to emergency departments. These patients are often intubated due to presumed full stomachs and perceived aspiration risk. Gastric ultrasound (GUS) -- a simple, non-invasive and objective option -- could be applied to this problem. This pilot study uses GUS alongside usual care at a music festival; a bounded, intoxication-dense environment where airways are often managed using non-invasive airway strategies. We aim to (1) clarify the gastric contents of any intubated patients, and (2) assess if patients managed without intubation go on to have a lack of aspiration sequelae because of empty stomachs or in spite of full stomachs. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a multi-day music festival. Patients presenting to on-site medical services with GCS ≤ 13 and known or suspected substance use were included. Patients with trauma, instability, metabolic derangements or additional aspiration risk factors (eg morbid obesity, pregnancy) were excluded. Standard GUS was performed by a trained provider and results were categorized according to convention as FS (full stomach, ie solids or liquids >1.5mL/kg) or ES (empty stomach, ie empty or liquids <1.5mL/kg). Additional patient data were extracted from linked medical records post event. Results: 33 patients met inclusion criteria and 27 remained after exclusions were applied and consent obtained. 25 patients reported substance use and 19 polysubstance use. The FS group had 15 patients (7 solid & 8 liquid > 1.5), and the ES group had 12 patients (5 empty & 12 liquid < 1.5). The median low GCS documented for FS and ES was 7 and 11 respectively, and 10 patients total had a GCS of 8 or less (6 FS & 4 ES). No patients were intubated and all were managed conservatively according to usual care. 3 patients (2 FS, 1 ES) were transferred to hospital. No patients re-registered at medical for clinically significant aspiration. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates the potential utility of GUS in stratifying aspiration risk in intoxicated patients with decreased GCS. “Empty” stomachs might avoid intubation, while the implications and true risks of “full” stomachs for aspiration sequelae in the absence of intubation remain unclear. Due to the small numbers in this pilot study and the quoted GUS sensitivity (only 95%), further research is needed to evaluate the safe application of this modality to clinical decision-making in intoxicated patients.
P097: The emergency department experience for patients and caregivers referred from an outpatient oncology clinic
Authors: Freymond M. , O'Connor E. 
Published: May 2020

Introduction: Outpatient oncology clinics have become the mainstay of cancer treatment, but their limited services and hours of operation often lead to emergency department (ED) referrals. With Canada's aging population and cancer survival rates improving, cancer-related ED visits are becoming a significant aspect of emergency medicine. A cancer-related visit to the ED is associated with unique challenges for patients, their caregivers and clinicians. This study focuses on understanding the ED experience of patients and their caregivers sent from an outpatient oncology clinic to a separate affiliated large academic hospital. Methods: A descriptive, phenomenological study of interviews was conducted using the method of Giorgi. The sample included 12 participants (n = 9 patients, 3 caregivers) referred to the ED at a large academic hospital (i.e., Toronto General Hospital, TGH) following a same-day outpatient oncology appointment at an affiliated cancer centre (i.e., Princess Margaret Hospital, PMH). Interviews continued until thematic saturation. All transcripts were analyzed by 2 reviewers with bracketing to ensure accuracy. Results: Four themes were identified from analysis: (1) communication; (2) expectations; (3) care and symptom management and (4) potential improvements. Overall patients and caregivers felt communication between PMH and TGH, and from providers could have been better. Many felt there was a break-down in communication as they did not expect to go through the usual ED triage process, which caused additional anxiety and frustration with the wait times. The majority felt their symptoms were managed in a timely manner and reported the staff to be friendly, caring and professional; however, often felt forgotten and anxious due to a lack of “checking-in”. Their experience could have been improved by receiving more information on the process, a more welcoming environment and separate waiting area or private room for those who are immunocompromised. Conclusion: Although referral from an outpatient oncology clinic to the ED of an affiliated hospital is a common process within Canada, this is the first study to explore the patient and caregiver experience. Understanding the patient and caregiver experience is valuable for identifying quality improvement initiatives. Our analysis revealed the patient and caregiver experience could be improved with better communication and expectation setting regarding the ED process before and throughout the visit.
P098: Patterns of utilization and time-course of events for cancer-related emergency department visits following same-day outpatient oncology appointments
Authors: Freymond M. , O'Connor E. 
Published: May 2020

Introduction: Nearly 50% of Canadians will develop cancer in their lifetime (1), and the vast majority of those with cancer will visit the emergency department (ED) in their last 6 months of life (2). Considering the aging population, improvement in cancer survival and current practice of managing cancer in outpatient settings, cancer-related emergencies are becoming a significant aspect of emergency medicine. The presenting symptoms and rates of hospitalization for cancer-related ED visits have largely been established. The current study characterizes the patterns of ED utilization and time-course of events for cancer-related ED visits following same-day outpatient oncology appointments resulting in admission to hospital compared to those not admitted. Methods: A retrospective chart-review was used to identify 231 adult patients who visited the ED at a large academic hospital (i.e., Toronto General Hospital) following a same-day outpatient oncology appointment at an affiliated cancer centre (i.e., Princess Margaret Hospital) from March to May 2019, using administrative data. Results: All visits occurred on weekdays (avg = 4 visits/d) and 57% of visits resulted in hospitalization. Between those admitted and not admitted to hospital, there was no difference in triage time [17:23 + 0:14 vs. 17:01 + 0:20 h, p = 0.47; mean(SD)]. Visits resulting in hospitalization were more urgent (median CTAS score = 2 vs. 3, p < 0.001) and required more consultation services (64 vs. 17 % of visits, p < 0.001), but did not differ for imaging (36 vs. 33 % of visits, p = 0.63). The length of stay in the ED was longer for those admitted [16.6(0.9) vs. 5.3(0.3) h, p < 0.01), they waited longer for their initial assessment [2.6(1.9) vs. 1.8(1.3) h, p < 0.01) and spent 10.1(9.9) h waiting for a bed on the ward. There was no difference in time from initial assessment to disposition, imaging or consult reports (p > 0.05) between groups. The patients transferred from oncology clinics were triaged at 17:13(0:11) h compared to 13:56(0:03) h for all ED visits during the same time frame. Conclusion: Most patients sent from oncology clinics to the ED are admitted, and when admitted they spend an additional 10 h waiting for a bed on the ward. These patients tend to arrive later in the day compared to other ED patients. Understanding utilization patterns and time-course of events allows for objective identification of quality improvement initiatives. 1 Canadian Cancer Society, 2015 2 Barbera et al. CMAJ, 2010
P111: Kussmaul's sign for the diagnosis of right ventricular myocardial infarction
Authors: Dubé E. , Crozier M. , Middleton A. , Best B. 
Published: May 2020

Introduction: Kussmaul's sign, the absence of a drop in JVP or a paradoxical increase in JVP on inspiration, can be elicited clinically as an indicator of right ventricular myocardial infarction (RVMI). RVMI poses unique diagnostic and management challenges. It complicates 30-50% of inferior MI and is associated with increased mortality when compared to inferior MI without RV involvement. Early recognition allows maintenance of preload by avoiding use of nitroglycerin, diuretic and narcotic medication, and treatment with fluids and vasopressors. We reviewed the evidence for Kussmaul's sign for diagnosis of RVMI. Methods: We conducted a librarian assisted search using PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane database, relevant conference abstracts from 1965 to October 2019. No restrictions for language or study type were imposed. All studies with patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction were reviewed. Two independent reviewers extracted data from relevant studies. Studies were combined when similar study populations were present. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Random effects meta-analysis was performed using metaprop in Stata for the 3 reference standards combined. Subset analysis for each of the 3 reference standards was completed. Results: We identified 122 studies: 10 were selected for full text review. Eight studies had comparable populations with a total of 469 consecutive patients admitted to the coronary care unit with acute inferior myocardial infarction and were included in the analysis. Prevalence of RVMI was 36% (CI 95% 31.8–40.5). References standards for the diagnosis of RVMI included echocardiography, 16 lead ECG and haemodynamic studies. A gold standard for diagnosis of RVMI is lacking and thus the reference standards were combined. Kussmaul's sign had a sensitivity of 69.3% (CI 95% 46.3 - 85.5, I2- 86.7%), specificity of 95.1% (CI 95% 75.6 - 99.2, I2- 89.3%) and LR + 14.1 (CI 95% 2.6-73.2). Subset analysis of echocardiography, ECG and haemodynamic studies revealed sensitivity of 45%, 77% and 82% (I2- 62%, N/A, 70%) respectively and specificity of 92%, 84% and 92% (I2- 86%, N/A, 86%). Conclusion: Kussmaul's sign is specific for acute right ventricular myocardial infarction and may serve as an important clinical sign of right ventricular dysfunction requiring preload preserving management.
P119: Emergency department census is useful as a real-time measure of crowding
Authors: Clouston R. , Howlett M. , Canales D. , Fraser J. , Sohi D. , Lee S. , Atkinson P. 
Published: May 2020

Introduction: Crowding is associated with poor patient outcomes in emergency departments (ED). Measures of crowding are often complex and resource-intensive to score and use in real-time. We evaluated single easily obtained variables to establish the presence of crowding compared to more complex crowding scores. Methods: Serial observations of patient flow were recorded in a tertiary Canadian ED. Single variables were evaluated including total number of patients in the ED (census), in beds, in the waiting room, in the treatment area waiting to be assessed, and total inpatient admissions. These were compared with Crowding scores (NEDOCS, EDWIN, ICMED, three regional hospital modifications of NEDOCS) as predictors of crowding. Predictive validity was compared to the reference standard of physician perception of crowding, using receiver operator curve analysis. Results: 144 of 169 potential events were recorded over 2 weeks. Crowding was present in 63.9% of the events. ED census (total number of patients in the ED) was strongly correlated with crowding (AUC = 0.82 with 95% CI = 0.76 - 0.89) and its performance was similar to that of NEDOCS (AUC = 0.80 with 95% CI = 0.76 - 0.90) and a more complex local modification of NEDOCS, the S-SAT (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74 - 0.89). Conclusion: The single indicator, ED census was as predictive for the presence of crowding as more complex crowding scores. A two-stage approach to crowding intervention is proposed that first identifies crowding with a real-time ED census statistic followed by investigation of precipitating and modifiable factors. Real time signalling may permit more standardized and effective approaches to manage ED flow.