Adverse health impacts of cooking with kerosene: A multi-country analysis within the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology Study
Authors: Arku Raphael E , Brauer Michael , Duong MyLinh , Wei Li , Hu Bo , Lap Ah TSE , Mony Prem K , Lakshmi PVM , Pillai Rajamohanan K , Mohan Viswanathan , Yeates Karen , Kruger Lanthe , Rangarajan Sumathy , Koon Teo , Yusuf Salim , Hystad Perry ,   PURE (Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological) Study investigators
Published: June 2020

AbstractBackgroundKerosene, which was until recently considered a relatively clean household fuel, is still widely used in low and middle-income countries for cooking and lighting. However, there is little data on its health effects. We examined cardiorespiratory effects and mortality in households using kerosene as their primary cooking fuel within the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study.MethodsWe analyzed baseline and follow-up data on 31,490 individuals from 154 communities in China, India, South Africa, and Tanzania where there was at least 10% kerosene use for cooking at baseline. Baseline comorbidities and health outcomes during follow-up (median 9.4 years) were compared between households with kerosene versus clean (gas or electricity) or solid fuel (biomass and coal) use for cooking. Multi-level marginal regression models adjusted for individual, household, and community level covariates.ResultsHigher rates of prevalent respiratory symptoms (e.g. 34% [95% CI:15-57%] more dyspnea with usual activity, 44% [95% CI: 21-72%] more chronic cough or sputum) and lower lung function (differences in FEV1: -46.3 ml (95% CI: -80.5; -12.1) and FVC: -54.7 ml (95% CI: -93.6; -15.8)) were observed at baseline for kerosene compared to clean fuel users. The odds of hypertension was slightly elevated but no associations were observed for blood pressure. Prospectively, kerosene was associated with elevated risks of all-cause (HR: 1.32 (95% CI: 1.14-1.53)) and cardiovascular (HR: 1.34 (95% CI: 1.00-1.80)) mortality, as well as major fatal and incident non-fatal cardiovascular (HR: 1.34 (95% CI: 1.08-1.66)) and respiratory (HR: 1.55 (95% CI: 0.98-2.43)) diseases, compared to clean fuel use. Further, compared to solid fuel users, those using kerosene had 20 – 47% higher risks for the above outcomes.ConclusionsKerosene use for cooking was associated with higher rates of baseline respiratory morbidity and increased risk of mortality and cardiorespiratory outcomes during follow-up when compared to either clean or solid fuels. Replacing kerosene with cleaner-burning fuels for cooking is recommended.HighlightsKerosene was (until 2014) considered a relatively clean household fuel for cooking and lightingThough the WHO discouraged kerosene use, evidence in support of this position are still scarceWe prospectively examined the effects of kerosene use on cardiorespiratory morbidity and mortalityKerosene use for cooking was associated with higher rates of baseline respiratory morbidityProspectively, kerosene use was associated with increased risk of mortality and incident cardiorespiratory outcomes compared to clean fuel or solid fuel useReplacing kerosene with cleaner-burning fuels for cooking is recommended