bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Preliminary results of a phase II study of neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade for surgically resectable undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS).
Authors: Roland Christina Lynn , Keung Emily Zhi-Yun , Lazar Alexander J. , Torres Keila E , Wang Wei-Lien , Guadagnolo Ashleigh , Bishop Andrew Justin , Lin Heather Y. , Hunt Kelly , Feig Barry W. , Bird Justin E. , Lewis Valerae O. , Tawbi Hussein Abdul-Hassan , Ratan Ravin , Patel Shreyaskumar , Wargo Jennifer Ann , Somaiah Neeta 
Published: May 2020

11505 Background: is a randomized, phase II non-comparative trial evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade [nivolumab (N) or ipilimumab/ nivolumab (I/N)] in patients (pts) with surgically resectable retroperitoneal DDLPS or extremity/truncal UPS treated with concurrent neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT, UPS only). Methods: Primary endpoint was pathologic (path) response. Secondary endpoints were safety, RECIST response, recurrence-free survival, overall survival and patient-reported outcomes. Biospecimens (tumor, blood, fecal microbiome) at baseline, on therapy, and at time of surgery were collected and will be assessed for immune-based prognostic biomarkers. We assessed correlation between radiographic and pathologic response by linear regression. Correlative analyses includes assessment of tumor PD-L1 expression, characterization of tumor immune infiltrates by multiplex immunohistochemistry, and transcriptomic and genomic analyses. Results: Of the 25 pts enrolled; 24 are evaluable for response (14 DDLPS, 9 UPS). Clinical activity was variable by histologic subtype and treatment with RT. Median path response in the UPS cohort was 95% [95% CI 85–99] and was similar between the N/RT and I/N/RT groups (Table). Median path response in the DDLPS cohort was 22.5% [95% CI 85–99; Table]. Median change in tumor size (radiographic response) was -4% and +9% in the UPS and DDLPS cohorts, respectively. There was no correlation between path response and radiographic response (R2 0.0309; p = 0.43). Of 8 pts with path response ≥ 85%, there was 1 partial response, 5 stable disease and 2 progressive disease by RECIST criteria. There was 1 delay to surgery due to grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia (Arm B). There was no difference in toxicity between N/RT and I/N/RT. Conclusions: N/RT and I/N/RT have significant clinical activity in UPS; more than expected compared to historic controls. Toxicity profiles were as expected and the majority of patients underwent resection without delay. Larger studies evaluating N/RT in UPS are warranted given the significant path response in this cohort. RECIST was not associated with path response and better markers of on-treatment clinical activity are needed. Correlative analyses that may guide combination strategies are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03307616 .
Defining the role of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in high-risk retroperitoneal sarcoma: A multi-institutional TARPSWG study.
Authors: Tseng William W. , Barretta Francesco , Conti Lorenzo , Grignani Giovanni , Tolomeo Francesco , Albertsmeier Markus , Angele Martin K , Rutkowski Piotr , Skoczylas Jacek , De Paoli Antonino , Navarria Federico , Hu James S , Raut Chandrajit P , Fairweather Mark , Farma Jeffrey M. , Nessim Carolyn , Goel Neha , Subhawong Ty , Grignol Valerie Patrice , Gronchi Alessandro ,   on behalf of the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group
Published: May 2020

11513 Background: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but this can be challenging, and recurrence rates are high. Novel treatment approaches are needed. In this study, we sought to 1) determine the frequency and potential predictors of radiologic tumor response and 2) assess clinical outcomes in patients with primary high risk RPS who were treated at sarcoma referral centers with neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by surgery. Methods: Clinicopathologic data was retrospectively collected for eligible patients treated from 2008-2018 at 13 institutions within the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG). For each patient, preoperative objective response (RECIST1.1) was reported by each institution. Univariable and multivariable logistic models were performed to determine predictors of response. Kaplan-Meier plots were constructed for overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidences of local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM). Results: In total, 158 RPS patients were included in this study. A median of 3 cycles (IQ range 2-4) of neoadjuvant systemic therapy were given. No complete responses were observed. Partial response (PR) was seen in 37 patients (23%), stable disease (SD) in 88 (56%) and progressive disease (PD) in 33 (21%). Subtype-specific differences were seen including PR in 5 out of 11 (45%) patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Overall, higher number of cycles given was positively associated with PR (p = 0.005). No other factors including receipt of neoadjuvant radiation therapy were predictive of PR. All patients underwent complete (R0/R1) resection with a major complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) rate of 23%. Differences in OS were observed based on preoperative response type (p = 0.005). In grade 3 dedifferentiated liposarcoma, patients who received adriamycin-ifosfamide versus another regimen had decreased LR and improved OS. In leiomyosarcoma, patients who received adriamycin-DTIC versus another regimen had a higher PR rate (37% vs. 16%), decreased LR, DM and improved OS. Limited by low numbers, these subtype-specific data did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In patients with high risk RPS, response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy is overall modest and may be regarded as an indicator of disease biology to predict survival after surgery. Subtype-specific regimens should be further validated and incorporated into prospective trials of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in RPS (e.g. STRASS2).
A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine (G) alone or with pazopanib (P) in refractory soft tissue sarcoma (STS).
Authors: Ryan Christopher W. , Degnin Catherine , Cranmer Lee D. , Chen Yiyi , Pollack Seth , Tonkinson Jesse , Norr Phillip , Davis Lara E. 
Published: May 2020

11515 Background: Both G and P are active single-agents in the treatment of STS. We hypothesized that the anti-VEGF-R activity of P could augment the efficacy of G and conducted this study of G+P vs G+placebo (0). Methods: In this multi-center, double-blind study, eligibility included metastatic STS with receipt of 1–3 prior systemic regimens inclusive of an anthracycline. Patients (pts) were stratified by sarcoma subtype (liposarcoma (LPS) vs. other) and study site, then randomly assigned 1:1 to receive G 1000 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 every 21 days plus either P 800 mg PO or matching 0 daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 54 pts were accrued from 2012–2019, Accrual was halted prior to the planned N of 80 due to withdrawal of funding. There were no differences in pt characteristics between the two arms including age (median = 60), sex (M/F 52/48%), histology (LPS 30%, leiomyosarcoma 26%, UPS 15%, synovial 11%, other 17%) and number of prior systemic therapies (median = 1). With a median follow-up of 19.1 months, PFS favored G+P and was significant using the Gehan-Wilcoxon test which favorably weighs earlier events (table). The response rate was 6.9% on the G+P arm and 8.0% on the G+0 arm; response rate was 22% for LPS treated with G+P. The most common grade ≥3 AEs (G+P v G+0) were: neutropenia (41% vs 40), hypertension (17% v 4), anemia (7% v 12). One patient died of hepatic failure on the G+P arm. Conclusions: This study demonstrated improved PFS with G+P as compared with G alone. Early termination limited statistical power. G+P is active in LPS, although P regulatory labeling currently limits use for LPS. Clinical trial information: NCT01532687 . [Table: see text]
SAINT: Results of an expanded phase II study using safe amounts of ipilimumab (I), nivolumab (N), and trabectedin (T) as first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma [NCT03138161].
Authors: Gordon Erlinda Maria , Chua-Alcala Victoria S. , Kim Katherine , Dy Paul Stendahl , Paz Micaela Kristina , Angel Nicole , Moradkhani Ania , Quon Doris , Wong Steven , Jafari Omid , Chawla Sant P. 
Published: May 2020

11520 Background: Sarcoma cells are most immunogenic earlier in the disease. Hypothesis: Immune checkpoint inhibitors would be most effective when given as first-line therapy. Methods: Eligible patients include previously untreated male or female patients, ≥ 18 years of age with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS), with measurable disease by RECIST v1.1. Immune checkpoint inhibitors I (1 mg/kg i.v. q 12 weeks) and N (3 mg/kg i.v. q 2 weeks) were given with T (1.2 mg/m2 i.v. q 3 weeks), a tumoricidal agent that depletes growth-promoting macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. Primary endpoint: Objective response rate by RECIST v1.1; Secondary endpoints: (1) Progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, (2) Overall survival (OS) at 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 months, and (3) Incidence of adverse events. Results: Efficacy analysis: There were forty-one evaluable subjects. Best overall response rate was 19.5%; disease control rate 87.8%. The median OS was >12.5 months; median PFS was >6.0 months (6-month OS rate: 75%; 6-month PFS rate: 50%). Safety analysis: Grade 3 TRAEs include fatigue (n = 5), increased TSH (n = 3), decreased TSH (n = 1), adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), hyperglycemia (n = 1), dehydration (n = 1), hyponatremia (n = 2), bipedal edema (n = 2), increased AST (n = 8), increased ALT (n = 19), increased ALP (n = 2), increased CPK (n = 3), port site infection (n = 2), psoriasis exacerbation (n = 1), anemia (n = 6), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), and neutropenia (n = 2). Grade 4 TRAES include neutropenia (n = 1), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), and increased CPK (n = 2). Conclusions: These data suggest that combinatorial therapy with Ipilimumab, Nivolumab and Trabectedin (1) may have synergistic activity in achieving disease control, and (2) is safe with manageable toxicity for patients with previously untreated STS. Clinical trial information: NCT03138161 . [Table: see text]
IMMUNOSARC: a collaborative Spanish (GEIS) and Italian (ISG) sarcoma groups phase I/II trial of sunitinib and nivolumab in advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma: Results from the phase II part, bone sarcoma cohort.
Authors: Palmerini Emanuela , Lopez-Pousa Antonio , Grignani Giovanni , Redondo Andres , Hindi Nadia , Stacchiotti Silvia , Sebio Ana , Lopez-Martin Jose A. , Valverde Morales Claudia Maria , Martinez-Trufero Javier , Gutierrez Antonio , de Alava Enrique , D'Ambrosio Lorenzo , Collini Paola , Picci Piero , Casali Paolo Giovanni , Martin Broto Javier 
Published: May 2020

11522 Background: Herein, we present the results of the cohort on advanced bone sarcoma patients of the phase II part of the IMMUNOSARC study (NCT03277924), a European multicentre phase I-II trial aimed at investigating the activity of the combination of sunitinib (SU) and nivolumab (NI) in selected advanced sarcoma subtypes. Methods: Adult, pre-treated, progressing patients, ECOG 0-1, with a diagnosis of osteosarcoma, high-grade bone sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma or dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma were eligible. SU 37.5 mg/day as induction was given days 1-14 and then reduced to 25mg/day continuously. NI was administered at 3 mg/Kg every 2 weeks from week 3. SU-NI was maintained up to progression or intolerance. Primary end-point was progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at 6 months (H1: PFSR 6-months: 15%). Secondary end-points: overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v 1.1 and toxicity. Results: From Nov 2017 to Dec 2018, 40 eligible patients were included: (M/F = 27/13), median age 47 years (range 21-74), ECOG 0 in 11 (27%) cases, 36 (90%) were metastatic, 4 (10%) locally advanced. Histology: 17 osteosarcomas (43%), 14 chondrosarcomas (35%) (4 dedifferentiated), 8 Ewing sarcomas (20%), 1 bone undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (2%). PFSR at 6 months based on local evaluation was 32%. At a median FU of 12.5 months (2-26), median PFS was 3.7 months (95% IC 3.4-4) while median OS was 14.2 months (95%CI: 7.1-21.3). OS rate at 3 and 6 months were 87% and 73%, respectively. ORR by RECIST: 1 CR (2.5%) (1 patient with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, lasting 22 months and on going), 1 PR (2.5%) (1 patient with osteosarcoma, lasting 5.7 months), 22 SD (55%, lasting > 6 months in 45% of the cases) and 16 PD (40%). G3/5 toxicities are detailed in Table. Conclusions: The trial met its primary endpoint in the cohort of patients with advanced bone sarcoma, with > 30% of patients free from progression at 6 months. Pre-planned tumor microenvironment genomic, exploratory analysis on pre and post-treatment tumor samples is on going. Clinical trial information: NCT03277924 . [Table: see text]
Efficacy of maintenance therapy with zoledronic acid in patients with localized Ewing sarcoma: Report from the international Ewing 2008 trial.
Authors: Dirksen Uta , Koch Raphael , Bhadri Vivek , Brichard Bénédicte , Butterfass-Bahloul Trude , Cyprova Sona , Gelderblom Hans , Hauser Peter , Havemann Lianne , Hjorth Lars , Juergens Heribert , Kanerva Jukka , Kuehne Thomas , Ladenstein Ruth Lydia , Raciborska Anna , Rascon Jelena , Streitbuerger Arne , Timmermann Beate , Ranft Andreas , Faldum Andreas ,   on behalf of the Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study Group Ewing 2008, Sponsor UKM
Published: May 2020

11523 Background: Ewing 2008R1 (EudraCT2008-003658-13, Sponsor UKM) was conducted in 12 countries. It evaluated the effect of zolendronic acid (ZOL) maintenance therapy on event-free (EFS, primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS) from randomization in standard risk Ewing Sarcoma (EwS). Methods: Phase III, open label, prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients (pts) had localized EwS with either good histological response to induction chemotherapy and/or small tumors ( < 200ml). Pts received 6 cycles VIDE induction and 8 VAI (male) or 8 VAC consolidation (female) and were randomized to receive either 9 cycles of maintenance ZOL or no further treatment (control;ctrl). ZOL cycles started parallel to the 6th consolidation cycle. Randomization was stratified by tumor site (pelvis/no pelvis). Two-sided adaptive inverse-normal 4-stage design, changed after the 1st interim analysis via Müller-Schäfer method. Initial sample size 448 pts, type I error rate 5%, power 80%. Results: 284 pts were randomized between 2009 and 2018 (142 ZOL / 142 ctrl). With a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the primary endpoint EFS was not significantly different between the ZOL and ctrl group in the adaptive design (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.43-1.28, intention to treat). 3-year (3y) EFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI 77.7-90.8%) for ZOL vs 81.7% (95% CI 75.2-88.8%) for ctrl. Results were similar in the per protocol collective. Cause-specific HR for local recurrence in ZOL was csHR 0.30 (95% CI 0.08 -1.09; p = 0.07), for metastatic progress/new metastases csHR 1.0 (CI 0.5-2.2), for combined relapse/progress csHR 0.3 (95% CI 0.1-1.7), for second malignancies csHR 4.0 (95% CI 0.45-36.1) compared to ctrl. The 3y OS was 92.8% (95% CI 88.4-97.5%) for ZOL and 94.6% (95% CI 90.9-98.6%) for ctrl. For ZOL the 5y OS was 87.3% (95% CI 80.7-94.5%) and 89% (95% CI 83.7-95.9%) for ctrl. Noticeable more renal, neurological and gut toxicities were observed for ZOL (p < 0.05), with severe renal toxicities occurring more often in the ZOL arm (p = 0.003). Conclusions: In patients with standard risk localized Ewing Sarcoma there is no benefit from maintenance treatment with zoledronic acid, but significant side effects were observed. Clinical trial information: NCT00987636 .
A randomized, double-blind, phase II clinical trial of GI-6301 (yeast-brachyury vaccine) versus placebo in combination with standard of care definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced, unresectable, chordoma.
Authors: DeMaria Peter Joseph , Bilusic Marijo , Park Deric , Heery Christopher Ryan , Madan Ravi Amrit , Strauss Julius , Donahue Renee Nicole , Marte Jenn , Gilbert Mark R. , Steinberg Seth M. , Schlom Jeffrey , Gulley James L. 
Published: May 2020

11527 Background: Chordoma is a rare neoplasm of the notochord that overexpresses brachyury, a transcription factor associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, metastasis, poor prognosis, and chemotherapy resistance. GI-6301 is a recombinant yeast-brachyury vaccine shown to demonstrate brachyury-specific immunogenicity, excellent safety profile, and some evidence of clinical activity in patients with chordoma in a previous phase I trial. Radiation therapy (RT) can modulate the tumor to become an immunostimulatory milieu. Preclinical studies have shown a synergistic effect combining RT with vaccine, thus prompting this clinical trial evaluating the combination of GI-6301 with RT in chordoma (NCT02383498). Methods: Adults with locally advanced, unresectable chordoma were treated on a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, phase 2 clinical trial. Patients received 3 doses of GI-6301 (80 x 107 yeast cells) vs placebo followed by photon or proton RT, followed by GI-6301 vs placebo until disease progression. Primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR) defined as a complete response or partial response in the irradiated tumor site at 24 months. Immune assays were conducted to evaluate immunogenicity. Due to slow accrual, an unplanned interim analysis was undertaken. Results: 24 pts were randomized and treated between May 2015 and September 2019. Vaccine was well tolerated with no dose reductions or treatment discontinuation. Treatment-related serious adverse events included: nausea/emesis (2); fatigue (2); dehydration (2); diarrhea (1); radiation necrosis (1); stroke (1); sepsis (1). There was no difference in ORR between the two arms. Pre-existing brachyury-specific T-cells were detected in the majority of patients but did not correlate with response to therapy. Most patients developed T-cell responses during therapy, regardless of treatment arm. Conclusions: There was no difference in ORR between the two arms. GI-6301 was well tolerated with toxicities related to RT, not vaccine. The trial was stopped early due to low conditional power for finding a statistical difference at the planned end of accrual, based on findings to date. Future studies will define utility of vaccines targeting brachyury in chordoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02383498 . [Table: see text]
Role of adjuvant imatinib dose in radically resected GIST harboring KIT exon 9 mutations.
Authors: Vincenzi Bruno , Napolitano Andrea , Nannini Margherita , Fumagalli Elena , Grignani Giovanni , Martin Broto Javier , Hindi Nadia , Italiano Antoine , Rutkowski Piotr , Hohenberger Peter , Brunello Antonella , Gasperoni Silvia , Joensuu Heikki , Badalamenti Giuseppe , Gennatas Spyridon , De Pas Tommaso Martino , Gronchi Alessandro , Dei Tos Angelo Paolo , Jones Robin Lewis , Bauer Sebastian 
Published: May 2020

11533 Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) with a driver mutation in KIT exon 9 (Ex9) represent about 10% of all newly diagnosed cases. In the metastatic setting, Ex9-mutated GIST patients benefit from higher doses of imatinib (800 mg/day vs standard 400 mg/day). The additional therapeutic benefit from a higher dose of imatinib in the adjuvant setting in this molecular subgroup has not been confirmed. Methods: We retrospectively identified 105 patients (pts) with resected Ex9-mutated GIST treated with adjuvant imatinib (800 mg/day or 400 mg/day) in 15 different European centers. Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Imatinib Failure-Free Survival (IFFS) were calculated and analyzed according to the daily dose of imatinib and relevant clinical and pathological variables. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate survival in univariate analyses, and the log-rank test was used to compare the groups. Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a univariable Cox model. A multivariate Cox regression model was also performed. Results: Of the 105 pts who met the inclusion criteria, 69 (65.7%) were treated with 400 mg/day and 36 (34.3%) with 800 mg/day. The risk score (AFIP-Miettinen criteria) between the two dose groups was not statistically different (P = 0.29). Median DFS was 73.0 months (mo) in the 400 mg/day group and 61.9 mo in the 800 mg/day group (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.47-1.47; P = 0.50). Median IFFS was 156.8 mo in the 400/day mg group and 117.4 mo in the 800 mg/day group (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.34-1.29; P = 0.19). In a multivariable analysis, the variables statistically associated with DFS were mitotic count, the longest tumor diameter and the duration of adjuvant therapy. Mitotic count and the duration of adjuvant therapy were also associated with IFFS. Importantly, the daily imatinib dose was not associated with survival in either analysis (Table). Conclusions: This is the largest reported cohort of pts with Ex9-mutated GIST treated with either the 400 mg/day or the 800 mg/day dose of adjuvant imatinib. Although retrospective in nature, the data confirm the prognostic value of mitotic count and suggest that patients with Ex9-mutated GIST derive no additional survival benefit from the 800 mg/day dose. [Table: see text]
Lower-dosing ponatinib in pre-treated GIST: Results of the POETIG phase II trial.
Authors: Falkenhorst Johanna , Hamacher Rainer , Reichardt Peter , Ivanyi Philipp , Kasper Bernd , Hohenberger Peter , Hermes Barbara , Kostbade Karina , Pink Daniel , Sülberg Heiko , Metzenmacher Martin , Crysandt Martina , Bauer Sebastian 
Published: May 2020

11536 Background: Despite long-lasting responses to imatinib most metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) eventually progress and subsequent treatments are associated with limited duration of disease control. Ponatinib is a potent KIT inhibitor with a strong activity against secondary mutations in exon 17, including the highly resistant D816 mutations of KIT. Based on the dose-depending toxicity profile we sought to evaluate the safety and activity of lower dosing (30mg) ponatinib in pretreated patients with KIT-mutant GIST. We here report safety data for the whole cohort and first efficacy data for the last line cohort within a planned interim analysis. Methods: This multicenter phase 2 trial (NCT03171389) recruited patients with advanced, unresectable GIST progressing after imatinib (Cohort A/B: absence/presence of KIT Exon 13/14 mutations by plasma sequencing) or imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib (Cohort C). Patients were treated with 30mg oral ponatinib daily in 4-week-cycles. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate at 16 weeks as measured by mRECIST1.1 criteria. Results: At the cutoff date of 31st Jan 2020, 39 patients were evaluable for safety analysis (25 male, 14 female, median age 60 (38-86) years). Median duration of treatment was 65 (14-699) days. 66.7% of all patients observed Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), most common were pain (10/39), hypertension (6/39), GGT or lipase increase (both 5/39), and fever (3/39). One AE of special interest was observed (myocardial infarction, rated not related to study drug) and 20/39 patients experienced at least 1 severe AE (6/39 possibly related to ponatinib). Within the last line cohort, 20 patients were evaluable for efficacy. Clinical benefit rate was 35% (CI 15.4-59.2%). Median progression-free survival was 86 days with single patients yielding long-lasting responses (75% quartile 210 days, maximum: 420 days). Conclusions: Treatment with ponatinib was tolerable at a dose of 30mg qd with a toxicity profile comparable to other TKIs used in GIST. The majority of grade 3/4 AEs were hypertension or asymptomatic increases of laboratory values and thromboembolic events were rare. In a heavily pretreated patient population that lacks alternative treatment options the clinical activity was notable. An updated analysis including predictive biomarkers will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03171389 .