(Invited) Nanometer-Distance Control in Plasmonic Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells and Applications of Localized Surface Plasmon to Next Generation of Solar Cells
Authors: Ihara Manabu 
Published: February 2020

When metal nanoparticles (NP), such as silver (Ag) and gold (Au), are irradiated by sunlight, their localized surface plasmon is excited, thus causing light scattering and light absorption. The ratio of light absorption to scattering strongly depends on the particle size. In general, when the nanoparticles are larger than 100 nm in diameter, the extinction of light is dominated by scattering; this property is applied to anti-reflection or light trapping for solar cells. When the metal nanoparticles are smaller than several tens of nanometers, light extinction is dominated by light absorption, and this light absorption generates near-field light accompanied by a strong electric field.
In 1997, we previously introduced the concept of a dye-sensitized solar cell that utilizes localized surface plasmons and is thus called a “plasmonic DSSC” [1]. In this DSSC, near-field light is used to enhance both the photoabsorption of Ru-dye and the generation of photoelectrons. By introducing AgNPs into a film of N3 dye, the absorbance of the dye can be increased by a factor of 149. Absorption enhancement has also been reported when the composite films are formed with AuNPs and black dye (BD). A key factor for enhancing the photoabsorption of a plasmonic DSSC with such a composite film is an overlap in the photoabsorption spectra between the metal nanoparticles and the dye. [2]
In this paper, we summarized our enhancements of DSSCs by using localized surface plasmon with focusing on the nanometer-distance control between metal NP, dyes and TiO2. Furthermore, the applications of localized surface plasmon to next generation of solar cells will be introduced. The types of solar cells suitable for applying localized surface plasmon will comprehensively be discussed.
Plasmonic dye-sensitized solar cells
DSSC with AgNPs showed improved photoelectric conversion efficiency (Eff
) of 2.5%, compared with about 1.5% for a DSSC without AgNPs [3]. In that study, to clarify the effect of AgNPs on the power generation characteristics, the TiO2 film of the DSSC was 2 μm thick, which is thinner than that for a typical DSSC (~10 μm).
An optimal thickness of the TiO2 film should exist for capturing sunlight while preventing back charge transfer. The dependence of TiO2 thickness on the performance of a DSSC with metal nanoparticles had been investigated. [4]
The level of electric field enhancement around AuNPs strongly depends on parameters such as the dielectric constant, distance from the surface of the particle, particle size, particle shape, and light wavelength, and thus depends on the combination of materials and their surface state. The length and conformation of the surface modulator is critical to determine the distance between the dyes, metal nanoparticles and TiO2. [5] Figure 1 shows the schematic of nanometer-distance control using a surface modulator in DSSC.
Attempting to highly control the distance, the hybridization of the peptide nucleic acide (PNA), which has similar structure to deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), was used to improve the efficiency of DSSC. The Eff
of DSSC was enhanced from 3.1% to 4.0% by the incertion of Ag NP with PNA bonded with TiO2. [6]
Applications of localized surface plasmon to next generation of solar cells
The following applications of localized surface plasmon to several kinds of solar cell (Plasomonic unti-reflecting coating for silicon solar cells [7], Plasmonic extremely thin absorber (ETA) solar cells [8, 9], Plasmonic interlayer for multijunction solar cells [10], and Plasmonic porous silicon solar cells) will be sumarized. At same time, the suitable type of solar cells for the applying will be discussed with considering the principle of each solar cell. Finally, I will introduce the concept of silicon nanowire tandem solar cells under the project of “FUTURE-PV Innovation”.
Acknowledgement
A part of this work was supported by the MEXT, FUTURE－PV Innovation Project.
References:
(1) M. Ihara et al., J. Phys. Chem. B., 101 (1997) 5153.
(2) M. Enomoto et al. and M. Ihara, ECS Transactions, 25(42), (2010), 37
(3) M. Ihara et al., Physica E, 42 (2010) 2867.
(4) M. Ihara et al., Proceedings of PVSC37, 881 (2011)
(5) R. Ito et al. and M. Ihara, Technical digest of PVSEC17, 6P-P5-05 (2007),
(6) N. Loew et al. and M. Ihara, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 3(2), (2014), Q1
(7) Y. Tanaka et al. and M. Ihara, ECS Transactions, 33(17), (2011), 81
(8) S. Yoshioka et al. and M. Ihara, ECS Transaction, 50(51), (2013), 33
(9) X. Zhang et al. and M. Ihara, ECS Transaction, 64(15), (2014), 1
(10) K. Nam et al. and M. Ihara, ECS Transaction, 50(51), (2013), 77

Figure 1