bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Phase II study of consolidation amrubicin after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer.
Authors: Yoshida Hironori , Kim Young Hak , Ozasa Hiroaki , Sakamori Yuichi , Nishimura Takashi , Tomii Keisuke , Mio Tadashi , Hirai Toyohiro 
Published: March 2020

8555 Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using etoposide and cisplatin has been the gold standard for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) for decades; however, approximately three out of four cases treated by CCRT inevitably relapse. Amrubicin (AMR), a synthetic anthracycline with a structure similar to doxorubicin, has demonstrated strong antitumor activity against relapsed SCLC and has been the standard second-line treatment for SCLC in Japan. We consider consolidation AMR following CCRT to be a potential treatment for patients with LS-SCLC. Methods: In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, all patients enrolled were treated using induction CCRT consisting of four cycles of etoposide at 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and cisplatin at 60 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks, plus concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (1.5 Gy twice daily, total 45 Gy) concomitant with the first cycle of chemotherapy. Then, eligible patients received three cycles of AMR at 40 mg/m2 on days 1-3 every 3 weeks as consolidation treatment. The primary endpoint was the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate in patients who received consolidation AMR, and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. This study was terminated early due to slow patient accrual. Results: Of the 36 patients who underwent induction CCRT (ITT population), 28 (78%) received AMR as consolidation therapy (consolidation population) and 24 (67%) completed all planned treatments. The 2-year PFS rate and ORR were 35.7% and 86% (8 CR and 16 PR), respectively, in the consolidation population. The median PFS and median OS were 14.3 months (95%CI, 10.8-46.6) and 60.9 months (95%CI, 29.8-NR), respectively, in the consolidation population. In the ITT population, the median PFS and the median OS were 13.4 months (95%CI, 7.5-19.0) and 60.9 months (95%CI, 29.8-NR), respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities during the consolidation phase included neutropenia (39%), thrombocytopenia (14%), and febrile neutropenia (7%). There were no treatment-related deaths in the ITT population. Conclusions: Consolidation AMR following standard CCRT consisting of etoposide and cisplatin plus concurrent thoracic radiotherapy was feasible, and demonstrated promising efficacy for LS-SCLC. Clinical trial information: 000002352.
Thoracic twice-daily radiotherapy and brain metastasis in patients with small cell lung cancer.
Authors: Zeng Haiyan , Li Rui , Hu Chen , Qiu Guoqin , Ge Hong , Yu Huiming , Zhang Kaixian , Hu Miaomiao , Zeng Peng , Xiao Dan , Miao Chuanwang , Wei Chuqing , Ni Meng , Shen Jingyi , Li Hui , Hu Xudong , Kong Feng-Ming Spring , Yuan Shuanghu , Yu Jinming 
Published: March 2020

8560 Background: Although thoracic twice-daily radiotherapy (TDRT) is one of standards of care for small cell lung cancer, its impact on brain metastases remains unknown. This study aimed to compare TDRT with once-daily radiotherapy (ODRT) for the brain metastases rate after prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small cell lung cancer. Methods: Consecutive patients received TDRT (45Gy/30f)/ODRT(50-66Gy/25-33f), chemotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation were retrieved from eight hospitals’ databases between 2003 and 2016. The endpoints included brain metastases, progression-free survival and overall survival. Brain metastases rate was evaluated using competing risk analysis. A 1:1 propensity score matching approach was used to control confounding between these two groups. Confounding covariates included eight demographic variables and eight treatment related covariates. Results: Of the 778 eligible patients with median age of 55-year (IQR, 48-61), 204 (26.2%) were female. At a median follow-up time of 23.6 months (IQR, 14.2- 38.2), 131 (16.8%) experienced brain metastases. The rates in TDRT were significantly higher than ODRT (3-year, 26.0% vs. 16.9%; HR = 1.55, 95%CI 1.06-2.26, P = 0.03). Of the 338 matched patients (169 in ODRT vs. 169 in TDRT), 60 (17.8%) experienced brain metastases with 3-year rate of 14.9% in ODRT vs 26.0% in TDRT (HR = 1.71, 95%CI 1.02-2.88, P = 0.04). Progression-free survival was similar in both the whole cohort and the matched one. Overall survival in ODRT tended to be significantly longer after matching (median, 47.2 months in ODRT vs. 32.8 months in TDRT; HR = 1.41, 95%CI 0.99-2.01, P = 0.06). When jointly evaluated biologically effective dose (BED), start of any therapy to the end of radiotherapy (SER) and TDRT/ODRT in the multivariable analysis, the impact of ODRT/TDRT on overall survival become more significant (HR = 1.69, 95%CI 1.05-2.71, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients with small cell lung cancer who were treated with thoracic TDRT appeared to have higher risk of brain metastases than those with ODRT, which strongly supports the need for further prospective randomized clinical trials, especially in China or other parts of Asia.
Progression free survival and time to local failure after radiosurgery of pleural metastases in twenty-two patients with thymomas.
Authors: Pasquini Giulia , Chella Antonio , Menichelli Claudia , Lucchi Marco , Fabrini Maria Grazia , Maestri Michelangelo , Ricciardi Roberta , Cappelli Sabrina , Petrini Iacopo , de Rosa Anna , Guida Melania , Lucchesi Maurizio 
Published: March 2020

8565 Background: Thymomas but not thymic carcinomas can benefit of cytoreductive surgery even if a complete resection is not achievable. Surgical resection of pleural metastases, the most common site of progression, can be performed in selected patients. We evaluated the outcome of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for treatment of pleural metastases in patients’ not eligible for surgery. Methods: We retrospectively identified 22 patients treated with SBRT for pleural metastases between 2004 and 2019. According to RECIST criteria, time to local failure and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Results: Twelve of the 22 patients were male. The median age was 40 years (range 29-73). There were 1 A, 3 AB, 3 B1, 3 B2, 3 B2/B3 and 9 B3 thymomas. The Masaoka stage at diagnosis was IIA in 2, IIB in 7, III in 5, IVA in 7 and IVB in 1 patient. Pleural metastases and primary tumor were synchronous in 8 patients. Thymectomy was performed in 21 patients. Seven patients received pre-operative chemotherapy and 12 post-operative radiotherapy. One patient received chemotherapy and radiotherapy after a macroscopically incomplete thymectomy. Five patients had a single pleural metastatic site and 17 presented multiple localizations. Sixteen patients received SBRT on multiple sites of pleural metastases. At the time of the analysis a patient received SBRT exclusively on one of 3 pleural metastases. The median dose of radiation was 30Gy (range 25-40) given in 3 fractions. Ten patients experienced a progression of treated lesions with a median time to local failure of 25.5 months (95%CI 20.9-30.1). The median PFS was 20.4 months (95%CI 10.7-30). There were not significant differences in PFS between patients diagnosed with synchronous and metachronous metastases (p=0.477), across those treated with chemotherapy or naive (p=0.189) and between those who received or not a previous surgical resection of the pleural metastases (p=0.871). Conclusions: SBRT of pleural metastases is feasible and offer an interesting local control of diseases. The impact of this treatment on patients’ survival is hardly predictable because of the heterogenous clinical behavior of thymomas.
A phase II study of talazoparib (BMN 673) in patients with homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRRD) positive stage IV squamous cell lung cancer (Lung-MAP Sub-Study, S1400G).
Authors: Owonikoko Taofeek Kunle , Redman Mary Weber , Byers Lauren Averett , Hirsch Fred R. , Mack Philip C. , Schwartz Lawrence Howard , Bradley Jeffrey D. , Stinchcombe Tom , Leighl Natasha B. , Al Baghdadi Tareq , Lara Primo , Miao Jieling , Kelly Karen , Ramalingam Suresh S. , Herbst Roy S. , Papadimitrakopoulou Vassiliki , Gandara David R. 
Published: March 2020

9022 Background: This signal finding study was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a PARP inhibitor, talazoparib, in advanced stage squamous cell lung cancer harboring HRRD. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) identified through the parent S1400 screening platform were required to have a deleterious mutation in any of the study-defined HRR genes [ATM, ATR, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCA, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCF, FANCM, NBN (NBS1), PALB2, RAD51, RAD51B (RAD51L1), RAD54L, RPA1) defined as the full eligible population (FEP). The primary analysis population (PAP) is defined by a subset of genes [ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2]. Pts have platinum sensitive disease (at least stable disease on platinum doublet) and progressed on most recent line of systemic therapy, a Zubrod performance status of 0-1, adequate organ function, and not have been previously exposed to a PARP inhibitor and not be on systemic therapy within 21 days of registration. A 2-stage design with exact 93% power and 1-sided 0.07 level type I error required enrollment of 40 patients in the PAP in order to rule out an ORR of 15% or less if the true ORR is 35% or greater. At least 3 or more responses were needed in the first 20 pts in order to proceed to full enrolment of 40 pts in the PAP. The total accrual goal was 60 FEP assuming 67% of patients would be in the PAP. Results: The study enrolled 51 patients of whom 47 are eligible and analyzable for response (FEP) with 24 in the PAP. In the FEP, median age 66.7 yrs; M/F 39/8 (83/17%); 85% White and 15% Black; 77% of the pts received at least 1 prior line of treatment for stage IV. The study was closed for futility with only one response in the PAP. In the PAP (n = 24, median age 68 yrs), ORR was 4% (95%CI: 0, 21) and DCR was 54% (95%CI: 33, 74); median PFS of 2.4 months (95%CI: 1.5-2.8) and median OS was 5.2 months (95%CI: 3.8-10, 7). There were five responders in the FEP with ORR of 11%; DCR of 53% and median DoR was 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.3, 4.2); median PFS was 2.5 months (95%CI: 1.6-3.0) and median OS was 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.5-8.7). The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse event in the FEP were: Anemia (14.9%), thrombocytopenia (12.8%); lymphopenia (8.5%) and nausea (6.4%). Conclusions: S1400G failed to show sufficient level of efficacy for talazoparib in a biomarker defined subset of squamous lung cancer with HRRD. There were no new safety signals and hematologic toxicities were the most frequent adverse events. Clinical trial information: NCT02154490.
Time from stereotactic body radiotherapy to immunotherapy as a predictor for outcome in metastatic non small cell lung cancer.
Authors: Wegner Rodney E , Abel Stephen , Hasan Shaakir , White Richard , Finley Gene Grant , Monga Dulabh , Colonias Athanasios , Verma Vivek 
Published: March 2020

9024 Background: Immunotherapy has changed the face of treatment for stage IV non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), quickly becoming the standard of care. The appropriate timing of immunotherapy in the setting of other ablative therapies, namely stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), remains to be determined. We sought to use the National Cancer Database to examine trends in immunotherapy use as well as timing as it relates to SBRT/SRS in stage IV NSCLC patients. Methods: We queried the NCDB for patients with Stage IV NSCLC diagnosed between 2004-2015 that were treated with SRS or SBRT techniques (to any site) and had at least three months of follow up. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of immunotherapy use. Receiver operator curve analysis was used to identify the optimal timepoint between SBRT and immunotherapy correlating with overall survival. Kaplan-meier curves were generated to determine overall survival. Multivariable cox regression was used to determine factors predictive of survival. A propensity score was generated and incorporated into Kaplan-meier and cox regressions to account for indication bias. Results: We identified 13,862 patients meeting the above eligibility criteria, 371 being treated with immunotherapy. The vast majority (75%) had chemotherapy as well. Patients with adenocarcinoma, treatment with chemotherapy, and more recent year of treatment were more likely to receive immunotherapy. Univariable Kaplan-meier analysis showed improved median survival with immunotherapy, 17 months vs. 13 months, p < 0.0001. On multivariable propensity-adjusted cox regression significant predictors for improved overall survival were younger age, lower comorbidity score, lower grade, private insurance, and female gender. Using a cutoff of 21 days after start of SBRT, patients treated thereafter were more likely to survive longer, median survival of 19 months vs 15 months, p = 0.0335. Conclusions: Immunotherapy use in Stage IV NSCLC after SBRT has increased over time, mostly in patients with adenocarcinoma and in the setting of chemotherapy. In this analysis, outcomes were improved when immunotherapy was given at least three weeks after start of SBRT.
Phase Ib study: Selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor ACY-241 + nivolumab (Nivo) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Authors: Awad Mark M. , Le Bruchec Yvan , Lu Brian , Miller Julieann , Dumitru Calin Dan , Spira Alexander I. 
Published: March 2020

9029 Background: Identification of new regimens for patients (pts) with relapse/refractory NSCLC is an ongoing need. HDAC inhibitor monotherapy has cytostatic activity in pts with NSCLC. The HDAC6 inhibitor ACY-241 has immunomodulatory activity and may synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This phase Ib study investigated ACY-241 + nivo in metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Previously platinum-treated, ICI-naïve pts with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS ≤ 1 were eligible. In 3 + 3 dose-escalation, pts received ACY-241 (180, 360, or 480 mg PO; d 1-28) + nivo 240 mg on d 15 of cycle 1 and d 1,15 subsequently in 28-d cycles. Primary outcomes: safety and RP2D. Secondary outcome: antitumor activity. Exploratory outcome: biomarker analyses; peripheral blood samples and tumor biopsies were collected pre- and on-treatment. Results: As of Jan 17, 2019, 18 pts were treated. Median age 66 y; 56% male, 78% PS 1, 93% stage IV, 28% PD-L1–negative, and 89% adenocarcinoma (11% squamous). No DLTs were observed at ACY-241 180 or 360 mg, and 2 DLTs were observed at 480 mg (gr 3 nausea lasting > 72 h despite medication; gr 5 cardiac arrest); 360 mg was declared RP2D. Common all-grade AEs: fatigue (22%), arthralgia (17%), and cough (17%); 1 gr 3 cerebrovascular accident (related to brain metastasis unrelated to study drug) and 1 additional gr 5 AE (myasthenia gravis, possibly related to ACY-241 and nivo) occurred. Of 13 response-evaluable pts, 8 had clinical benefit (1 CR, 3 PR [1 PD-L1–negative], 1 unconfirmed PR [tumor shrinkage followed by new lesion], 3 SD); 5 had PD. At data cutoff, treatment was ongoing in 5 pts (12 – 30 cycles). Histone and tubulin acetylation levels were transiently increased after treatment. Circulating IL-2, IL-1β, MMP-9, and IL-10 levels increased, with undetectable TNF-α and IFN-γ modulation. Treatment-related changes in tumor-infiltrating Treg, MDSC, TCM, and macrophages varied between pts but revealed a trend of increased infiltrating cytotoxic T and NK cells. Conclusions: The ACY-241 + nivo combination is feasible and can be considered for further research as a potential NSCLC treatment option. Biomarker analyses may help identify an optimal population for the combination. Clinical trial information: NCT02635061.
The impact of sequential therapy of crizotinib followed by alectinib: Real-world data analysis of 840 ALK-inhibitor naïve patients with NSCLC harboring ALK-rearrangement (WJOG9516L).
Authors: Ito Kentaro , Yamanaka Takeharu , Watanabe Satomi , Hattori Yoshihiro , Nishino Kazumi , Kobayashi Haruki , Oya Yuko , Yokoyama Toshihide , Seto Takashi , Azuma Koichi , Fukui Tomoya , Kozuki Toshiyuki , Nakamura Atsushi , Okamoto Isamu , Hirano Katsuya , Yokoi Takashi , Daga Haruko , Sakata Shinya , Nakagawa Kazuhiko , Yamamoto Nobuyuki 
Published: March 2020

9038 Background: Previous clinical trials demonstrated that alectinib (ALEC) had a longer time-to-progression than crizotinib (CRZ) in 1st-line settings. Information on long-term overall survival (OS), however, is still limited with a few studies having reported that the sequential strategy of “CRZ followed by other ALK-inhibitor” can provide extended OS. In Japan, ALEC was approved for a 1st-line setting earlier than in other countries. Methods: We reviewed the clinical data of ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients who received CRZ or ALEC between May 2012 and Dec 2016. Patients were divided into two groups according to the first-administered ALK inhibitor, the CRZ or ALEC group. In order to evaluate the efficacy of the sequential strategy of “CRZ followed by ALEC”, the combined time to treatment failure (TTF) was calculated in the CRZ group as defined by the sum of the “TTF of CRZ” plus the “TTF of ALEC” if patients were treated with ALEC followed by CRZ. In the ALEC group, the “TTF of ALEC” was calculated. The primary endpoint is the comparison between the combined TTF in the CRZ group with the TTF in the ALEC group. Results: Of 864 patients enrolled from 61 institutions, 840 patients were analyzed. Median age was 61 (range, 20-94); 56% were female; and 95% had adenocarcinoma. There were 535/305 patients in the CRZ/ALEC group. In the CRZ group, 282 patients received ALEC after CRZ failure. The combined TTF in the CRZ group was significantly longer than TTF in the ALEC group; median, 34.4 vs 27.2 months (mo); hazard ratio (HR), 0.709 [95%CI;0.559- 0.899]; P= 0.0044. However, there was no significant difference in OS between the patients who received ALEC after CRZ in the CRZ group and the patients in the ALEC group; median, 88.4 months vs. not reached; HR 1.048 [95%CI;0.758-1.451]; P= 0.7770. In the whole population, the CRZ group had a significantly shorter OS than the ALEC group; median, 53.6 mo vs not reached HR, 1.821 [95%CI;1.372-2.415]; P< 0.0001. Conclusions: The combined TTF in the CRZ group was significantly longer than TTF in the ALEC group, however, OS benefit of sequential therapy of CRZ followed by ALEC was not shown. Clinical trial information: UMIN000028605.
Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC that were PD-L1 negative or less than 1%.
Authors: Landre Thierry , Des Guetz Gaetan , Chouahnia Kader , Taleb Cherifa , Vergnenegre Alain , Chouaid Christos 
Published: March 2020

9061 Background: Clinical efficacy of single agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in patients with Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer (NSCLC) that were PD-L1 negative or < 1% is controversial. Recent studies have evaluated the combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 to chemotherapy (CT) for this population in the first line setting. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis (MA) of randomized trials that compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus CT with CT alone in first line of treatment for advanced NSCLC. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in patients with undetectable PD-L1 expression or < 1%. A fixed-effect or random-effects model was adopted depending on between-study heterogeneity. Results: Four studies evaluated atezolizumab + CT (IMpower 130,131,132 and 150), three studies pembrolizumab + CT (Keynote 021, 189 and 407) and one study evaluated nivolumab + CT (CheckMate 227). The eight eligible studies included 2037 patients (1246 with PD-L1 negative and 791 with PD-L1 expression < 1%). Most of the patients were men and smokers, with a median age of 64 years. There were 1423 Non-squamous (69.8 %) and 614 Squamous tumors (30%). The combination (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor + CT) was significantly associated with improvement of OS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI 0.63–0.89; p < 0.0001), PFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.65–0.80; p < 0.0001) and ORR (relative ratio [RR], 2.59; 95% CI 1.46–4.60; p < 0.0001). Moreover, median duration of response (DOR) was statistically longer with combination (8.1 months versus 4.9; p < 0.0008). Conclusions: For patients with untreated NSCLC with low ( < 1%) or undetectable PD-L1 expression, the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination with chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, is associated with significantly improved OS, PFS, and ORR.
Phase I/Ib study of pembrolizumab and vorinostat in patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC): Updated results.
Authors: Saltos Andreas Nicholas , Tanvetyanon Tawee , Haura Eric B. , Creelan Ben C. , Antonia Scott Joseph , Shafique Michael Rahman , Zheng Hong , Dai Wenjie , Chen Zhihua , Saller James Joseph , Tchekmedyian Nishan , Goas Kristen , Thapa Ram , Boyle Theresa A. , Chen Dung-Tsa , Beg Amer A , Gray Jhanelle Elaine 
Published: March 2020

9073 Background: Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) enhance tumor immunogenicity through several mechanisms and may augment response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We report updated results from a phase I/Ib trial testing the combination of oral HDACi vorinostat (V) with PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab (P) in mNSCLC. Methods: In phase I, pts with ICI-naïve or ICI-pretreated mNSCLC were treated with P (200mg IV q3 wk) + V (200 or 400 mg PO daily). In phase Ib expansion, pts were required to have progressed on prior ICI treatment. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability; secondary endpoints included RR, PFS, DOR, and OS. Tissue and blood specimens from pre- and on-treatment were collected for correlative analyses to determine tumor gene expression changes, T cell density and levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Results: Between 3/2016 - 12/2018, Phase I: 13 pts were treated (4 at 200mg, and 9 at 400mg V dose); and Phase Ib: 20 pts were treated. Median age: 68 (range 38-82); Females: 11 (33%); ECOG 1: 31 (94%); and never/former/current smokers: 3/22/8 (9%/67%/24%). PD-L1 expression was < 1% in 8/33 (18%), ≥1-49% in 7/33 (21%), ≥ 50% in 9/33 (27%) and unknown in 11/30 (33%). No DLTs or treatment related deaths were observed. The RP2D was P 200mg and V 400mg. Most common any grade AEs was fatigue (11%) and nausea/vomiting (8%). 2 (6%) patients had treatment discontinued due to toxicity. 30 pts are evaluable for response, 6 ICI-naïve and 24 ICI-pretreated. 4 (13%) had PR (2 confirmed), 16 (53%) had SD, and 10 (33%) had PD for a disease control rate of 67%. In the ICI-pretreated Ib cohort, 3 pts (1 confirmed; 2 unconfirmed) had a PR and 10 had SD (8 confirmed). For ICI-pretreated pts, mPFS was 3.2 and mOS was 7.3 months, and 1-year PFS was 17% (4 pts). For ICI-naïve, mPFS was 7.6 months and mOS was 16 months. CD8 T cell presence in tumor stromal regions was associated with benefit to P + V treatment. Conclusions: P + V were well tolerated. The combination demonstrates preliminary anti-tumor activity despite progression on prior ICI treatment and stromal CD8 T cells may be associated with benefit from P + V treatment. A randomized phase II portion of this study, examining P combined with V vs. placebo in immunotherapy naïve pts, is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02638090.