bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Prognostic role of early interim [18F] fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced seminoma undergoing standard treatment.
Authors: Raggi Daniele , Bandini Marco , Giannatempo Patrizia , Farè Elena , Marandino Laura , Colecchia Maurizio , Padovano Barbara , Serafini Gianluca , Alessi Alessandra , Necchi Andrea 
Published: May 2020

5055 Background: In patients (pts) with advanced seminoma, efforts are underway to tailor a risk-adapted treatment strategy to the individual pt. Our main objective was to prospectively determine the prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT2) after two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) or EP chemotherapy under standardized treatment and PET evaluation criteria. Methods: Pts with advanced-stage seminoma were treated with BEP or EP according to guidelines. PET/CT examinations were performed at baseline, after two cycles in all pts and after chemotherapy at physician’s choice. PET/CT response was qualitatively evaluated by two independent nuclear medicine physicians. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were also performed according to the guidelines (at baseline, after treatment, during follow-up). The primary endpoint was the relapse-free survival (RFS). Results: From 01/2009 to 01/2017, 75 consecutive pts were enrolled, of whom 70 were evaluable. The clinical stage was IIA-B and IIC-III in 40% and 60% of the pts, respectively. Eight pts (11.4%) received consolidation radiotherapy. By local assessment, 46 PET/CT2 scans (65.7%) were reported as negative, and 46% of these pts presented with stage IIC-III. The median follow-up was 79 months. Five-year RFS of PET/CT2-positive pts was 75% (95%CI: 60-95%) compared with 97.8% (95%CI: 93.7-100%) of PET/CT2-negative pts (p = .002). This significant improvement in RFS was maintained when analyzing only pts with clinical stage IIC-III (p = 0.04) and by excluding those who received consolidation RT (p = 0.02). An increasing linear association was found between the maximum diameter of retroperitoneal lymph nodes and the rate of PET/CT2+. In univariable Cox regression analyses, PET/CT2+ (HR: 12.9, 95%CI: 1.5-106.9, p = 0.02) and elevated HCG levels (HR: 6.3, 95%CI: 1.2-32.3, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with RFS, whereas IGCCCG risk group was not (p = 0.1). PET/CT2 result was also associated with the tumor shrinkage post-BEP (p = 0.009), whereas complete response at CT did not predict the RFS (p = 0.3). Conclusions: No residual FDG-uptake after 2 cycles of conventional chemotherapy is prognostic in advanced seminoma, may outperform the utility of standard prognostic risk groups and may be more accurate to predict the RFS compared to standard response criteria. Benchmark RFS estimates for the design of the next clinical trials of chemotherapy de-escalation are offered.
Immunomodulation by HDAC inhibition: Results from a phase I study with entinostat in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.
Authors: Pili Roberto , Adra Nabil , Damayanti Nur , Logan Theodore F. , Narayan Vivek , Monk Paul , Dropcho S , Sego Lina M , Liu Hao , Althouse Sandra K. , Haas Naomi B. 
Published: May 2020

5064 Background: Immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) limit the efficacy of immunotherapies. We have previously reported that the HDAC inhibitor entinostat has synergistic antitumor effect in combination with immunotherapies in preclinical models by inhibiting Tregs and MDSCs function. The combination of atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) and bevacizumab (VEGF inhibitor) is active in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Thus, we have conducted a Phase I study with entinostat, atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients (pts) with metastatic RCC. Methods: The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability. The phase I portion included 3 dose levels of entinostat (1 mg, 3 mg or 5 mg, PO weekly) and fixed, standard doses of atezolizumab (1200 mg IV every 21 days) and bevacizumab (15 mg/Kg IV every 21 days). Pts with any histological type and prior therapies were included. Results: Dose levels were completed with up to 1 DLT/dose level. 5 mg was the Phase II recommended dose for entinostat. DLTs included hypertension, encephalopathy, hyponatremia and pruritus. The most common resolved grade 3/4 toxicities were hypophosphatemia (33%), hypertension (17%), and pneumonitis (11%). We have enrolled 18 pts (17 evaluable for ORR by RECIST). 5 pts continue on treatment. 3 pts discontinued treatment because of adverse events, 9 pts for disease progression, and one pt for physician decision. Good risk and intermediate risk pts were 61% and 39%, respectively. Overall ORR was 47.1% (95% CI 23.0-72.2) and median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 1.6-16.3). In pts with no prior therapies (12) the ORR was 58.3% (95% CI 27.7-84.8) and median PFS was 13.4 months (95% CI 1.5-28.9). One additional PR was observed by ir-RC but was not confirmed within the data cut-off date of 11/11/19. In pts with prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (5) ORR was 20% (95% CI 0.5-71.6) and median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 1.3-NR). Preliminary data show a statistically significant lower % of circulating monocytic MDSC (HLADR−1CD11b+CD33highCD14+CD15−) and exhausted T cells (CD45+CD3+CD8+TIM3+) following treatment in pts (4) with objective responses as compared to pts (4) with progressive disease. Conclusions: The results from this phase I suggest that the combination of entinostat, atezolizumab and bevacizumab is relatively well tolerated and is active in renal cell carcinoma patients, in both ICIs naïve and resistant disease. A phase II portion of this study is currently accruing patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03024437 .
Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) of lenvatinib plus everolimus versus everolimus monotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Authors: Lee Chung-Han , Wan Yin , Smith Alan D. , Xie RAN , Motzer Robert J. 
Published: May 2020

5067 Background: In the primary analysis of Study 205 phase II trial (NCT01136733), lenvatinib+everolimus (vs everolimus) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (median PFS; 14.6 vs 5.5 months, HR = 0.40, 95% CI [0.24, 0.68]) in advanced RCC patients who received one prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Overall treatment differences were evaluated in a post hoc analysis using a quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) methodology. Methods: Patients’ survival time was partitioned into three mutually exclusive health states: time spent with grade 3/4 toxicity (TOX), time prior to disease progression and without grade 3/4 toxicity (TWiST) and time post disease progression (REL). Mean time spent in each state was weighted by a health-state utility associated with that state and summed to calculate the Q-TWiST. Non-parametric bootstrapping method was used to generate 95% CI, which evaluates the between-treatment differences. At base case, utility for TWiST, TOX and REL were assigned as 1.0, 0.5 and 0.5, respectively. A sensitivity analysis was used, applying utilities across the range of 0 (similar to death) to 1.0 (perfect health). A relative gain in Q-TWiST of ≥10% and ≥15% has been established in previous literature as clinically important and clearly clinically important, respectively. Results: Patients receiving lenvatinib+everolimus (n = 51) vs everolimus (n = 50) had significantly longer mean time in TWiST (10.9 vs 6.4 months; difference 4.5 [95% CI: 1.4, 7.8]) and numerically longer in TOX (1.9 vs 0.7 months; difference 1.2 [95% CI: -0.3, 3.1]) but shorter in REL (5.8 vs 8.5 months; difference -2.8 [95% CI: -6.2, 0.6]). At base case, lenvatinib+everolimus patients had a significant mean Q-TWiST gain of 3.7 months (14.7 vs 11.0; 95% CI of difference [1.3, 6.3]), with a relative gain of 24% vs everolimus. In a sensitivity analysis using alternative utility values for TWiST (varied from 0.55 - 0.9) with utility of TOX and REL both set as 0.5, absolute mean Q-TWiST gain ranged from 1.7 to 3.3 months, with a relative gain ranging from 11.0% to 21.2% (all significant). With TWiST utility set as 1.0 and utility of TOX and REL varying from 0 to 1.0, Q-TWiST gain ranged from 1.7 to 5.8 months (mostly significant and became non-significant as the REL utility gets closer to 1.0 and TOX utility gets closer to 0). Conclusions: Within Study 205, lenvatinib+everolimus resulted in a statistically significant and clinically important gain in Q-TWiST vs everolimus alone. Clinical trial information: NCT01136733 .
Efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the treatment of older adults with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): An international mRCC database consortium (IMDC) analysis.
Authors: Araujo Daniel Vilarim , Wells Connor , Hansen Aaron Richard , Dizman Nazli , Pal Sumanta K. , Beuselinck Benoit , Donskov Frede , Gan Chun Loo , Yan Flora , Tran Ben , Kollmannsberger Christian K. , de Velasco Guillermo , Yuasa Takeshi , Reaume M. Neil , Ernst D. Scott , Powles Thomas , Bjarnason Georg A. , Choueiri Toni K. , Heng Daniel Yick Chin , Dudani Shaan 
Published: May 2020

5068 Background: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now a standard of care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Older adults were underrepresented in registration trials and given that immunological senescence may affect the anti-tumor activity of ICIs, there is uncertainty about the efficacy of ICIs in this population. Here we provide real world data on outcomes of older adults with mRCC treated with ICIs. Methods: Patients with mRCC treated with a PD-1/PD-L1 ICI either as monotherapy or as a combination treatment from 2000 to 2019 were included. Older adult was defined as ≥ 70-years at the time of ICI treatment. Descriptive statistics were summarized in means, medians and proportions. Efficacy was assessed by survival analysis, including overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall response rate (ORR). Multivariate analyses adjusted for imbalances in IMDC risk factors. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of 1427 patients, 397 (28%) were older adults. Mean age of older vs. younger adults was 74 (70-92) vs. 60 (22-69) years. Groups were comparable in terms of gender (Female 28.5% vs. 26.1%, p = 0.36), rates of nephrectomy (21% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.24) and presence of sarcomatoid features (12.3% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.14). Proportion of IMDC risk-groups between older vs. younger adults were as follows: 15.4% vs. 18.2% for favorable, 61.2% vs. 59.1% for intermediate, and 23.4% vs. 22.7% for poor; there was no statistical difference (p = 0.55). ICI was used as 1st line in 40%, 2nd line in 48.5% and 3rd line in 11.5% patients; older adults were less likely to be treated with ICI in 1st line (32.2% vs. 43%, p < 0.01). In terms of survival, older adults had poorer median OS (25.1m vs. 30.8m, p < 0.01) but similar median TTF (6.9m vs. 6.9m, p = 0.40) compared to younger adults. In multivariate analyses, older age was not a predictor of either worse OS (aHR = 1.02, p = 0.86) or TTF (aHR = 0.95, p = 0.59). Older adults had a lower ORR compared to younger (24% vs. 31%, p = 0.01), which was mainly driven by responses in 1st line (31% vs. 44%, p = 0.02) and not observed in 2nd/3rd line (20% vs. 20%, p = 0.86). Conclusions: On multivariate analyses, older adults with mRCC treated with ICI had no difference in OS and TTF when compared to younger adults, despite having lower ORR in 1st line. Our data supports that older age is not an independent risk factor for survival; thus, treatment selection should not be based solely on chronological age.
First-line pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Updated follow-up for KEYNOTE-427 cohort A.
Authors: McDermott David F. , Lee Jae-Lyun , Bjarnason Georg A. , Larkin James M. G. , Gafanov Rustem , Kochenderfer Mark D. , Jensen Niels Viggo , Donskov Frede , Malik Jahangeer , Poprach Alexandr , Tykodi Scott S. , Alonso Gordoa Teresa , Cho Daniel C. , Geertsen Poul F. , Climent Duran Miguel Angel , Di Simone Christopher , Du Xiaoqi , Perini Rodolfo F. , Rodriguez-Lopez Karla , Atkins Michael B. 
Published: May 2020

5069 Background: KEYNOTE-427 (NCT02853344), an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, showed clinical activity of first-line pembro monotherapy in patients (pts) with ccRCC (cohort A). Previous studies in RCC and immune-oncology suggest depth of response may correlate with long-term benefit. Association between depth of response and OS, along with updated efficacy and safety for cohort A of KEYNOTE-427, are presented. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed ccRCC, measurable disease (RECIST v1.1), and no prior systemic therapy received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W for 2 y or until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. End points: ORR (primary), DOR, and PFS (RECIST v1.1); OS, and safety. Association between depth of response (maximum reduction from baseline in the sum of target lesions) and OS was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model with target lesion reduction group as time-varying covariate. Results: 110 pts enrolled; median time from enrollment to data cutoff was 23.1 (range, 16.7-27.5) mo. Overall, 38.2% of pts had favorable and 61.2% had intermediate/poor IMDC risk. ORR was 36.4% (95% CI, 27.4-46.1; 3 CRs, 37 PRs); median (range) DOR was not reached (2.3-23.5+ mo); 64.0% had a DOR ≥12 mo. Median PFS was 7.1 mo (95% CI, 5.6-11.0) and median OS was not reached; 18-mo PFS and OS rates were 26.6% and 80.0%, respectively. 69.1% had some reduction in target lesions. Pts with > 60% reduction in target lesions had a greater probability of survival than pts with a ≤60% reduction (Table). ORR observed in IMDC favorable and intermediate/poor risk was 31.0% and 39.7%, respectively; 18-mo OS rate was 95.2% for favorable and 70.5% for intermediate/poor IMDC risk. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 81.8% of pts, primarily fatigue (29.1%) and pruritus (28.2%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 29.1% of pts; 1 pt died of treatment-related pneumonitis. Conclusions: First-line pembro monotherapy was tolerable and showed promising antitumor activity in advanced ccRCC. In general, pts who had greater reductions in target lesions demonstrated a trend toward improved OS; pts with reduction of tumor burden ≥80% had comparable long term outcomes to those who achieved a RECIST 1.1 defined CR. Clinical trial information: NCT02853344 . [Table: see text]
Phase III trial of metronomic capecitabine maintenance after standard treatment in operable triple-negative breast cancer (SYSUCC-001).
Authors: Wang XI , Wang Shu-Sen , Huang Heng , Cai Li , Peng Rou-Jun , Zhao Li , Lin Ying , Zeng Jian , Zhang Le-Hong , Ke Yong-Li , Wang Xian-Ming , Liu Xin-Mei , Chen Qian-Jun , Zhang An-Qin , Pang Dan-Mei , Xu Fei , Huang Jia Jia , Shi Yanxia , Tang Jun , Yuan Zhongyu 
Published: May 2020

507 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a relatively high relapse rate and poor outcome after standard therapy among all subtypes of breast cancer. Effective strategies to reduce risk of relapse and death are unmet medical needs. Methods: In this phase III trial, patients with operable TNBC were randomly assigned to receive metronomic capecitabine (650 mg/m2 twice daily continuously for one year) as maintenance therapy or observation after standard local and systemic treatment for curative intent. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points included distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: A total of 434 patients were randomly assigned to capecitabine group (n = 221) or observation group (n = 213). At a median follow-up of 56.5 months, 5-year DFS was significantly better in capecitabine group than in observation group (83% vs. 73%, HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.96; p = 0.027). 5-year DDFS was also significantly better in capecitabine group than in observation group (85% vs. 76%, HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.90; p = 0.016). However, 5-year OS was not significantly different between two groups (85% vs. 81%, HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.18; p = 0.203). Two hundred and two (91.4%) of patients completed one year of capecitabine therapy as planned. The most common capecitabine-related adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (46%), leukopenia (24%), Hyperbilirubinemia (13%), gastrointestinal pain (7%) and elevated serum transaminases (5%). Conclusions: Maintenance therapy with metronomic capecitabine for one year following standard treatment significantly improved DFS in operable TNBC, which was safe and well tolerated. (SYSUCC-001, Clinical trial information: NCT01112826 .
Axitinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Long-term efficacy and safety from a phase Ib study.
Authors: Atkins Michael B. , Puzanov Igor , Plimack Elizabeth R. , Fishman Mayer N. , McDermott David F. , Cho Daniel C. , Vaishampayan Ulka N. , George Saby , Tarazi Jamal Christo , Duggan William , Perini Rodolfo F. , Fernandez Kathrine C. , Choueiri Toni K. 
Published: May 2020

5080 Background: Axitinib (AXI) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) showed superior overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate compared with sunitinib in a randomized Phase 3 trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Here, we report long-term efficacy and safety data of the combination AXI/pembro from the Phase 1 trial, with almost 5 years of follow-up. Methods: 52 treatment-naïve patients with advanced RCC were enrolled between 23 September 2014 and 13 October 2015, and were treated with oral AXI 5 mg twice daily and intravenous pembro 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Planned treatment duration was 2 years for pembro and not limited for AXI. Based on International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria, 46.2%, 44.2% and 5.8% of patients were reported as having favourable, intermediate and poor risk. Results: At data cut-off date (July 3, 2019), median OS was not reached; 38 (73.1%) patients were alive. 14 (26.9%) patients had died, none were related to treatment. The probability of being alive was 96.1% (95% CI 85.2–99.0) at 1 year, 88.2% (95% CI 75.7– 94.5) at 2 years, 82.2 % (95% CI 68.5– 90.3) at 3 years, and 66.8 % (95% CI 49.1–79.5) at 4 years. Median PFS was 23.5 (95% CI 15.4–30.4) months. Median duration of response was 22.1 (95% CI 15.1–not evaluable) months. Median time on treatment with the combination AXI/pembro was 14.5 months (n=52), median time on pembro after AXI discontinuation was 9.0 months (n=10), and median time on AXI after pembro discontinuation was 7.5 months (n=11). After stopping study treatment, 22 patients received subsequent systemic therapy, including nivolumab and cabozantinib (n=6 each). Grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 38 (73.1%) patients. 20 (38.5%) patients discontinued either drug due to AEs: 17 (32.7%) patients discontinued AXI, and 13 (25.0%) patients discontinued pembro with 10 (19.2%) discontinuing both drugs. Dose reduction of AXI due to AEs was reported in 16 (30.8%) patients. The most common AEs reported were diarrhea (84.6%), fatigue (80.8%), hypertension (53.8%), cough (48.1%), and dysphonia (48.1%). Increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase occurred in 44.2% and 36.5% of patients, respectively. With this longer follow-up, there were no cumulative AEs or new AEs. OS by IMDC risk group will be presented. Conclusions: In patients with advanced RCC with almost 5 years of follow-up, the combination of AXI/pembro continues to demonstrate clinical benefit with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT02133742 .
Patient preferences and expectations of systemic therapy in renal cell carcinoma.
Authors: Battle Dena , Bergerot Cristiane Decat , Msaouel Pavlos , Jonasch Eric , Zhang Tian , George Daniel J. , Staehler Michael D. 
Published: May 2020

5083 Background: In metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the systemic therapy landscape has expanded to include multiple VEGF inhibitors, immunotherapies, and combination therapy. Little is known about patient expectations and preferences when making decisions about systemic therapy. We sought to gather independent data from online kidney cancer patient communities to assess patient perspectives on what matters most when considering treatment options. Methods: The KCCure online survey was performed between August 1, and September 30, 2019. Patients were recruited via the KCCure website, social media channels (Twitter, Facebook) and through fliers distributed at cancer centers. Those who agreed to participate were surveyed for demographics (age, gender, race, income, country) and clinical characteristics (date of the diagnosis, disease stage, treatment history). Key questions focused on treatment selection and side effect management. Results: Out of 1,136 patients responding, 411 patients were on systemic therapy with a median age of 57 years (range 28-86). 223 (54%) of patients on systemic therapy were male. Patients were primarily from the U.S. (83%). Median duration on therapy was 24.7+/- 1.9 months. When asked to select the most important outcome for treatment selection, 58.8 % of patients chose complete response, followed by tumor control (10.2%), low risk of toxicity (5.7%) and the chance to discontinue therapy (3.7%). Patients ranked cost as the least important factor in selecting treatment (2.9%). 10.9% preferred infusion therapy and 42.1% oral therapy, whereas 47% were indifferent about the route of administration. Even if it would be safe to discontinue therapy, 62.8% of patients would be anxious about cancer progression. 23.2% would rather stay on treatment and 39.3% would want increased scanning intervals. Only 34.4% of patients would look forward to having more time off therapy. When asked to define treatment success, 86.3% selected reduction in tumor size, followed by stable disease (71.7%), freedom from symptoms (35.1%) and better quality of life (47.7%). Conclusions: Patients rank efficacy as the most important outcome when considering treatment options. Toxicity, time off therapy and cost are not significant priorities for patients. Further data is warranted investigating the impact of communicating treatment options, potential discontinuation of therapy and resulting expectations.