(Invited) Faradaic Charge Storage and Supercapattery Explained
Authors: Chen George Zheng 
Published: December 2020

Merit-merge of rechargeable batteries with supercapacitors is desirable because the two have complementary charge storage properties, namely larger storage capacity in the former, but higher power capability, greater efficiency and longer durability in the latter. It can be easily achieved via external connections, but this approach sacrifices both volumetric and gravimetric storage capacity. The more space-material efficient approach is internal combination, which can be achieved either at the material or device level [1]. In 2007, two new hybrids were proposed, namely lithium-ion capacitor [2] and supercapattery [3]. Whilst both terms describe internal hybridization, lithium-ion capacitor exemplifies at the device level, but supercapattery encompasses both material and device combinations. Because of its similarities to lithium-ion battery, lithium-ion capacitor has attracted fast growing R&D interest and investment, followed by various other ion capacitors [4]. Attention to supercapattery has grown only in the past few years, largely because the ion capacitor concept is not applicable to many new materials that are capable of Faradaic charge storage, but not specific for a particular ion. Another reason for the increased attention to supercapattery is related to the concept of pseudocapacitance which has long been identified to result from Faradaic charge storage. However, there are two Faradic storage mechanisms, namely Nernstian storage and capacitive storage, which were not acknowledged by many, leading to confusions and misleading claims in the literature. The past five years have seen much improved understanding of these issues, which will be summarized and selectively analyzed in this presentation, in relation with supercapattery. An example is to experimentally differentiate between electric double layer capacitance and pseudocapacitance by electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy [5,6], as shown in Figure 1.

References

[1] Chen GZ: Supercapacitor and supercapattery as emerging electrochemical energy stores. Int Mater Rev 2017, 62:173-202.
[2] Woo SW, Dokko K, Nakano H, Kanamura K: Bimodal porous carbon as a negative electrode material for lithium-ion capacitors.
Electrochem 2007, 75: 635-640.
[3] Company Profile: E.ON funds storage technologies.
Renewable Energy Focus 2008, 9:10.
[4] Ding J, Hu WB, Paek E, Mitlin D: Review of hybrid ion capacitors: From aqueous to lithium to sodium. Chem Rev 2018, 118:6457-6498.
[5] Chen Z, Studies of polymer modified electrodes. PhD Thesis, University of London, 1992.
[6] Chen GZ, Supercapattery: Merit-merge of capacitive and Nernstian charge storage mechanisms --- A selective literature review of supercapattery and similar devices from 2018 to 2019,
Curr. Opinion Electrochem.
, (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2020.04.002

Acknowledgement The author thanks the financial supports from the EPSRC (EP/J000582/1, GR/R68078), Royal Society (Braine Mercer Feasibility Award, 2006), E.ON AG (Energy Storage 2007), Season Long Cleantech Ltd (Beijing), and Ningbo Municipal People’s Governments (3315 Plan and 2014A35001-1).

Figure 1