Heat therapy reduces blood pressure and circulating endothelin‐1 levels, but does not improve walking performance or vascular function in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease
Authors: Monroe Jacob C. , Lin Chen , Perkins Susan M. , Han Yan , Motaganahalli Raghu L. , Roseguini Bruno T. 
Published: April 2020

INTRODUCTIONPatients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at a heightened risk of cardiovascular events and have markedly reduced vascular function and exercise tolerance. Heat therapy (HT) has emerged as a practical treatment to improve cardiovascular health in young individuals as well in patients with overt cardiovascular disease. We recently reported that a single 90 min session of HT applied to the legs of patients with PAD using water‐circulating trousers increases popliteal artery blood flow and reduces blood pressure and the circulating levels of the potent endogenous vasoconstrictor endothelin‐1 (ET‐1). The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the repeated exposure to leg HT would lower blood pressure and ET‐1 levels and improve walking performance and conduit artery and cutaneous vascular function in patients with symptomatic PAD.METHODSThirty‐two patients with symptomatic PAD (Age: 68± 8 years; Ankle‐brachial index: 0.67 ± 0.1) were assigned using a balanced randomized design to undergo 90 min of HT (48°C) or a thermoneutral treatment (33°C) 3 times per week for 6 consecutive weeks. The following outcomes were assessed at baseline and 3 and 6 weeks after the intervention: 1) resting ankle‐brachial index, 2) post‐occlusive reactive hyperemia in the popliteal artery (phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging), 3) leg cutaneous thermal hyperemia (laser Doppler flowmetry), 4) resting blood pressure every 5 min for 70 min, 5) 6‐min walk distance and 6) serum levels of ET‐1 and total nitrate (NOx).RESULTSParticipants completed 17.7 ± 0.6 treatment sessions, resulting in a compliance rate of 98.7%. In the group exposed to HT, systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased from baseline by ~3 mmHg at 6 weeks, while in the control group SBP increased by ~1 mmHg. A significant group by time interaction was observed for the changes in SBP from baseline to 6 weeks (p=0.0049) with significant group differences at 20 min (Change in SBP: Control: 6.27 ± 15.5 vs. HT: −7.60 ± 13.6 mmHg, p=0.015) and 60 min (Change in SBP: Control: 4.13 ± 15.1 vs. HT: −7.33 ± 13.7 mmHg, p=0.0386). Similarly, serum ET‐1 levels decreased by ~15% from baseline to week 6 following exposure to HT, while a ~6% increase in this parameter occurred in the control group (Change in ET‐1: Control: 0.16 ± 0.6 vs. HT: −0.30 ± 0.4 pg/mL, p=0.035 – one outlier removed). Resting ABI, diastolic BP, 6MWT distance, hyperemic peak flow and cutaneous thermal hyperemia were not different between groups.CONCLUSIONExposure to repeated HT reduces systolic blood pressure and ET‐1 levels in patients with symptomatic PAD. These findings indicate that HT may be a practical and accessible nonpharmacological tool to reduce cardiovascular risk in PAD patients.Support or Funding InformationAmerican Heart Association Scientist Development grant (16SDG27600003).