bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Outcome of allogenic SCT in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction
Authors: Qureshi S. , Bukhari F. , Saliba R. M. , Hosing C. , Champlin R. E. , Giralt S. A. , De Lima M. J. , Yusuf S. W. , Qazilbash M. H. 
Published: March 2020

7099 Background: High-dose therapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo SCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies. Due to a high risk of regimen-related toxicity, only patients with excellent organ-system function are considered eligible for this treatment. A low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤ 45% is considered to be a major risk factor for post-transplant cardiac toxicity and nonrelapse mortality. However, several patients with advanced hematologic malignancies and low LVEF can potentially benefit from this therapy. To address this issue, we studied the incidence of cardiac toxicity and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in 56 patients with low LVEF undergoing allo SCT. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on 56 patients with impaired cardiac function, who underwent an allo SCT between January 2000 and February 2006 at our institution. Pre-transplant evaluation included bidimensional echocardiogram and an electrocardiogram. Cardiac toxicity was defined as congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial / ventricular arrhythmia or acute myocardial ischemia. Twenty-two patients received a myeloablative (16 busulfan-based, 6 TBI-based), while 34 patients received a fludarabine-based reduced-intensity preparative regimen. Results: Twenty-three patients (41%) received allo SCT from an unrelated donor. Acute leukemia was the reason for allo SCT in 32 (57%) patients. Baseline LVEF, within 30 days prior to allo SCT, ranged from 20 to 45%. After a minimum of 6-month follow up, cardiac toxicity was seen in 7 (12%) patients. That included CHF in 4 (7%) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in 4 (7%). One patient had both CHF and AF. There were no documented episodes of acute myocardial ischemia. Cumulative incidence of NRM at 100 days was 12%, none of the deaths being attributable to a cardiac cause. These were comparable to allo SCT performed in patients with normal LVEF. Age, degree of left vetricular dysfunction, type of transplant or the underlying disease did not emerge as significant predictors of post-transplant cardiac toxicity or NRM. Conclusions: Allogeneic SCT is feasible in patients with hematologic malignancies and low LVEF. A prospective study with stratification for cardiac risk factors is warranted in patients with low LVEF. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
A rapid immunoassay to determine concentrations of busulfan in plasma
Authors: Salamone S. J. , Courtney J. , Harney R. , He S. , Lundell G. 
Published: March 2020

7111 Background: High-dose busulfan is an important component of many bone marrow transplantation preparative regimens. High busulfan plasma levels have been shown to increase the chance of veno-occlusive disease and low levels are associated with recurrence of disease or graph rejection. Currently, busulfan levels are monitored by physical methods which are expensive and time- consuming, resulting in relatively low overall use of busulfan testing for dose adjustment. Methods: Novel, highly selective antibodies for busulfan have been generated and micro-titer plate immunoassays that are capable of quantifying busulfan levels in plasma have been developed. The assay was configured using a busulfan-horseradish peroxidase conjugate as the reporter group and busulfan monoclonal antibodies. The assay requires only 5 μL of plasma per determination with no sample preparation. Results: The immunoassay has a standard curve based on busulfan with a range of 75 to 2,000 ng/mL. The time to first result is 30 minutes with up to 240 tests generated per hour. The coefficient of variation (CV) on signal is < 5% for an entire plate and the 95% confidence interval for negative samples (n=78) is below the lowest calibrator of 75 ng/mL. Cross-reactivity with the major inactive metabolites (tetrahydrothiophene,tetramethyl sulfone and tetrahydrothiophene-3-ol-1,1-dioxide), are <0.1%. Clinical samples (n=70) correlate well to LC-MSMS or GC-MS (R > 0.97) with a slope of < 1.05. Conclusions: This immunoassay method may be suitable for determining levels of busulfan in human plasma. It offers the advantages of using a smaller sample size, does not require sample preparation and is less labor intensive than other methods. The ability to make 240 determinations per hour enables effective routine monitoring of busulfan levels in clinical practice. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
iTARGET: A phase II trial to assess the response to gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors
Authors: Sequist L. V. , Martins R. G. , Spigel D. , Grunberg S. M. , Jänne P. A. , McCollum D. , Spira A. , Evans T. , Johnson B. E. , Lynch T. J. 
Published: March 2020

7504 Background: Somatic EGFR mutations correlate with increased response and survival in NSCLC patients (pts) treated with gefitinib. We conducted the 1st prospective US trial of 1st-line gefitinib in pts with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve pts with stage IIIB with effusion or IV NSCLC, measurable disease, and = 1 characteristic associated with mutations (female (F), adenocarcinoma (AC), never-smoking (NS), East Asian (EA)) underwent direct DNA sequencing of tumor tissue EGFR exons 18–24. Mutation-positive pts received gefitinib (250 mg/d) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was response rate (RR) by RECIST criteria. Results: We sequenced 98 pts and detected EGFR mutations in 34 (35%); 3 were not assessable. Observed mutations were 18 (53%) exon 19 deletions (del), 9 (26%) L858R, 3 (9%) exon 20 insertions (ins), 2 T790M/L858R, 1 G719A, and 1 L861Q. Characteristics of the 98 screened pts were 69 F, 89 AC, 37 NS, and 5 EA; those of the 34 mutation pts were 20 (59%) F, 31 (91%) AC, 19 (56%) NS and 2 (6%) EA. The best predictor of EGFR mutation was NS. Of the 34 mutation pts, 31 (91%) received gefinitib. Reasons for non-treatment were pt preference (1 exon 19 del) and mutation associated with gefitinib-resistance (1 T790M/L858R, 1 exon 20 ins). Adverse events were mainly grade 1–2 rash and diarrhea; 1 case of grade 4 interstitial lung disease occurred after 2 weeks of therapy. The RR was 58% (95% confidence interval 39–75) and was 78% in L858R pts and 65% in del 19 pts. There were no responses among the G719A, L861Q, T790M/L858R and exon 20 ins pts treated. 12 pts have progressed, 18 remain on therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) is currently 11.8 mo and does not differ by mutation type, though follow-up is short (median 6.8 mo, range 1–24). 27 pts are still alive. Of the 31 pts treated, 22 (71%) had high EGFR gene copy number (amplification (3) or high polysomy (19)); RR and PFS did not vary by copy number. Conclusions: 1st-line gefitinib therapy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC pts is feasible in a multi-institutional study, well tolerated, and yields a substantial RR and PFS. This strategy should be compared to standard chemotherapy in a genotype-directed randomized trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Validation of proteomic classifier for clinical benefit from erlotinib as first line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ECOG 3503)
Authors: Solomon B. J. , Roder H. , Robert R. , Taguchi F. , Brahmer J. , Joan S. H. , Duncan M. W. , Hirsch F. R. , Bunn P. A. , Carbone D. P. 
Published: March 2020

7508 Background: In this study we tested the ability of our serum mass spectrometry classifier of clinical benefit from gefitinib to classify pre-treatment sera and plasma samples from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated first line with erlotinib in ECOG E3503. Methods: Pretreatment serum and plasma samples were available from 73 of the 96 previously untreated advanced NSCLC patients treated with single agent erlotinib on ECOG protocol 3503, 13 subjects had only serum samples, and 10 had only plasma samples. All of these samples analyzed in replicate by MALDI mass spectrometry (MS). A prediction algorithm we established based on a training cohort of 139 patients treated second or third line with gefitinib was used to classify these patients for survival and time to progression, and results obtained from serum and plasma were compared when both were available Results: We found that the signals for the 8 distinct mass-to-charge (m/z) features used in our classifier were highly concordant between serum and plasma samples from the same patient, and that there was no difference in the classification of the patients between serum and plasma when both were available. Therefore we classified all 96 patients using serum if available, and plasma if not. The classification algorithm very successfully classified patients into groups with good and poor survival (median survival of 306 days vs 107 days, p = 0.0007). With the available follow-up, the time to progression was also statistically significant in this group (p = 0.007, data not shown). In a Cox multivariate analysis including the most significant univariate parameters PS (0 vs. 1 vs 2), number of involved sites (=3 vs >3) and prior weight loss (<5% vs = 5%), the MALDI MS classification algorithm retained independent significance at p = 0.03, with a hazard ratio of 0.53. Conclusions: This multi-institutional ECOG study demonstrates that MALDI MS can assist in the pre-treatment selection of a subgroup of NSCLC patients who are likely to show improved survival after treatment with first line erlotinib. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Phase III trial of cisplatin (P) plus etoposide (E) plus concurrent chest radiation (XRT) with or without consolidation docetaxel (D) in patients (pts) with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): HOG LUN 01–24/USO-023
Authors: Hanna N. H. , Neubauer M. , Ansari R. , Govindan R. , Bruetman D. , Fisher W. , Chowhan N. , Nattam S. , Yiannoutsos C. , Einhorn L. 
Published: March 2020

7512 Background: Concurrent chemoradiation is standard treatment for pts with inoperable stage III NSCLC. A previously reported single-arm, phase II study by SWOG (Gandara et al JCO 2003) suggested D following EP/XRT further improved survival. We report results from a randomized, prospective phase III trial comparing EP/XRT with or without consolidation D. Methods: Eligible pts had inoperable, stage IIIA/B NSCLC, PS 0–1, FEV-1 ≥ 1 L, and < 5% wt loss. Pts (n=243) received P 50 mg/m2 iv d 1,8,29,36 and E 50 mg/m2 iv d1–5, 29–33 concurrently with chest XRT to 5940 cGy. Non-progressing pts were randomized to D 75 mg/m2 iv every 21 d for 3 cycles vs observation (O). The primary endpoint was to compare OS (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Accrual of 259 pts to randomize180 was planned to demonstrate a difference in MST of 25 vs 15 mos (5% 2-sided alpha, 80% power). Based upon evidence of futility (predefined as p>0.7271), a DSMB recommended early termination after an analysis of the initial 203 pts. Results: Median f/u 25.6 mos. Pt characteristics (n=203): 34%/66% F:M; median age 63; 39.4%/60.6% IIIA/B. G3/4 toxicities during EP/XRT included 9.8% febrile neutropenia (FN), 17.2% esophagitis. 147 of 203 pts (72.4%) were randomized to D (n=73) or O (n=74). G3/4 toxicities during D included: 10.9% FN, 8.2% pneumonitis. 28.8% of pts were hospitalized during D (vs 8.1% in O arm) and 5.5% died due to D. PFS for D was 12.3 vs 12.9 mos for O (p=0.9412). The MST for all pts was 21.15 mos; MST for D was 21.6 mos (95% C.I. 17.7–35) vs 24.2 mos for O (95% C.I. 18.1–34.4) (p=0.9402). Conclusions: The MST with EP/XRT was higher than historical controls; however, consolidation D does not further improve survival, is associated with significant toxicity including an increased rate of hospitalization and premature death, and should no longer be used for pts with unresectable stage III NSCLC. [Table: see text]
Updated analysis of SWOG 0023: A randomized phase III trial of gefitinib versus placebo maintenance after definitive chemoradiation followed by docetaxel in patients with locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer
Authors: Kelly K. , Chansky K. , Gaspar L. E. , Jett J. R. , Ung Y. , Albain K. S. , Crowley J. J. , Gandara D. R. 
Published: March 2020

7513 Background: Early clinical studies with gefitinib (G) showed promising efficacy and mild toxicity in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Thus, G was an ideal agent to evaluate in a maintenance setting in stage III disease following definitive treatment. Methods: Untreated pts with stage III NSCLC, a PS of 0–1 and adequate organ function were eligible. Patients received the SWOG 9504 core regimen (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, d1 & 8 plus etoposide 50 mg/m2 day 1–5, every 28 days for 2 cycles with concurrent thoracic radiation, 1.8–2 Gy fractions/day, total dose 61 Gy, followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2). Non- progressing pts were randomized to G 250 mg per day or placebo (P) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or 5 years. The planned sample size was 672, to confer power of 0.89 to detect a 33% increase over the expected median survival of 21 months (one-sided 0.025 level logrank test). Randomization was stratified by stage and histology. Results: Enrollment began in July 2001. An unplanned interim analysis prompted by outside data was conducted in April 2005 and the alternative hypothesis of improved survival was rejected at the 0.0015 level for 243 randomized patients. The study closed and preliminary results were reported (ASCO 2005). Now with a median follow up of 27 months, median survival for the G arm (n=118) was 23 months and was 35 months for the P arm (n=125) (two sided p=0.013). Overall survival for the 571eligible patients was 19 months. ≥ Grade 3 toxicities in the G arm were rash (7%), diarrhea (7%) and pneumonitis (3%). Conclusion: In this unselected population G did not improve survival. Decreased survival was due to cancer not G toxicity. Three year survival estimates will be presented. Molecular studies of the EGFR pathway are underway and will be correlated with outcomes. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Pre-operative chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): First results of the MRC LU22/NVALT/EORTC 08012 multi-centre randomised trial
Authors: Nicolson M. , Gilligan D. , Smith I. , Groen H. , Manegold C. , van Meerbeeck J. , Hopwood P. , Nankivell M. , Pugh C. , Stephens R. J. 
Published: March 2020

7518 Aims: Although surgery offers the best chance of cure for patients with NSCLC, the overall 5-year survival rate is modest, and improvements are urgently required. This intergroup trial was designed to investigate whether, in patients with operable NSCLC of any stage, neo-adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy prior to surgery would improve outcomes. Methods: Patients were randomised to receive either surgery alone (S), or 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy prior to surgery (CT-S). Results: 519 patients were randomised (261 S, 258 CT-S) from 70 centres in the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. The median age of the patients was 63 years, 72% were male, 59% were PS 0, and 50% had squamous cell histology. The majority were clinical stage I (17% Ia, 45% Ib, 3% IIa, 29% IIb, 7% IIIa), and 12% received mitomycin/vinblastine/cisplatin (MVP), 7% mitomycin/ifosfamide/cisplatin (MIC), 45% vinorelbine/cisplatin, 12% carboplatin/docetaxel, and 25% cisplatin/gemcitabine. The trial showed that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was feasible (76% of patients received all 3 cycles of chemotherapy), resulted in a good response rate (4% CR, 45% PR, and only 2% PD), appeared to cause down-staging in about 20% of patients, and did not affect the type of surgery performed, the post-operative complication rate, or quality of life. However, there was no evidence of a benefit in terms of progression-free survival (282 events, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77,1.23) or overall survival (232 deaths, HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.81, 1.35), and more patients were reported as having brain metastases in the CT-S group (30 CT-S vs 11 S patients). Exploratory analyses showed no evidence that any subgroup of patients benefited from the addition of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: This intergroup trial, which is the largest trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC, indicated that the addition of neo-adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy did not lead to a benefit in overall survival. However, a 19% survival benefit or a 35% detriment cannot be excluded and this result needs to be considered in the context of all other relevant randomised trials of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC. [Table: see text]
S9900: Surgery alone or surgery plus induction (ind) paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) chemotherapy in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Follow-up on a phase III trial
Authors: Pisters K. , Vallieres E. , Bunn P. A. , Crowley J. , Chansky K. , Ginsberg R. , Gandara D. R. 
Published: March 2020

7520 Background: Small randomized and non-randomized studies suggest induction chemotherapy may improve survival in early stage NSCLC. The primary objective of this study was to determine if induction PC could improve survival over surgery alone. Preliminary results of this trial were reported at ASCO 2005 (J Clin Oncol, ASCO Proc 23(16S) 2005:7012). Median time for patients alive at last contact is now 46 months (mos). Methods: Consenting patients with clinical stage T2N0, T1–2N1 and T3N0–1 NSCLC (excluding superior sulcus tumors) were stratified by clinical stage (IB/IIA vs. IIB/IIIA) and randomized to induction PC (P:225 mg/m2 over 3 hours, C:AUC=6) on day 1, every 3 weeks × 3 or surgery alone. Eligible patients had a performance status 0–1, age =18 years (yrs), predicted post- resection FEV1 =1.0L. Surgery was at least a lobectomy and mediastinal nodal sampling. The primary endpoint was a 33% increase in overall survival over expected 2.7 yrs median for surgery. Planned sample size was 600 patients, 81% power, 1-sided test, 0.025 significance. Results: S9900 closed 07/04 when adjuvant chemotherapy became standard. 354 patients had accrued; 174-surgery alone, 180- induction PC; 19 were ineligible. Median age 65 yrs, 66% male, 70% IB/IIA, 30% IIB/IIIA. Major radiographic response to induction PC was 41%. Treatment-related deaths: 3 during induction PC, 11 within 30 days of surgery (7-induction PC arm, 4-control). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall (OS) survival rates and hazard ratios (HR) are shown. Conclusions: PFS and OS continue to trend in favor of induction PC with HR similar to those observed in adjuvant trials, supporting the role of chemotherapy in operable NSCLC. Randomized trials comparing induction to adjuvant chemotherapy are warranted. Supported by SWOG CA30102. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
A randomized phase III trial of irinotecan plus carboplatin versus etoposide plus carboplatin in patients with small cell lung cancer, extensive disease (SCLC-ED): IRIS-Study
Authors: Hermes A. , Bergman B. , Bremnes R. , Ek L. , Fluge S. , Sederholm C. , Sundstrøm S. , Thaning L. , Vilsvik J. , Aasebø U. , Sörenson S. 
Published: March 2020

7523 Background: A Japanese randomized trial has shown superior survival for SCLC-ED patients receiving irinotecan+cisplatin as compared to etoposide+cisplatin. Our trial was performed to evaluate the effect of irinotecan+carboplatin compared to oral etoposide+carboplatin. Patients and Methods: In a phase III trial, patients with SCLC-ED were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin, AUC=4 (Chatelut formula) and irinotecan, 175 mg/m2, both on day 1 (IC) or carboplatin (Chatelut AUC=4) on day 1 and etoposide 120 mg/m2/day, orally, on days 1–5 (EC). In both arms, courses were repeated on day 21 with 4 cycles planned. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints were quality of life, evaluated by EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC 13, and complete response rate. There were neither upper limits for age or performance status. Results: Between November, 2001 and July, 2005, 220 patients were randomized. 210 patients were eligible for analysis (other type of cancer, 8 pts., limited disease, 1 pt., elevated liver function tests, 1 pt.). Performance status (PS) 0: 20 patients, PS 1: 91, PS 2: 62, PS 3: 29, PS 4: 8. Median age IC was 67 years (46–81), EC 67 years (39–82). OS was 255 days (IC) versus 214 days (EC) (P=0.04, log rank test). HR for overall survival was 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01–1.79. 1-year survival was 35% vs 28%. CR was observed in 18 patients in the IC arm and 7 patients in the EC arm (P=0.02, chi-square test). There were no statistically significant differences with respect to haematological grade III-IV toxicity. No severe diarrhea was observed in the IC group. There were no significant differences regarding quality of life. Conclusion: Irinotecan + carboplatin is superior to oral etoposide + carboplatin with respect to overall survival in SCLC-ED. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Randomized trial of amifostine in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiation (HRT): Long-term survival results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9801
Authors: Movsas B. , Moughan J. , Langer C. , Werner-Wasik M. , Nicolaou N. , Komaki R. , Machtay M. , Smith C. , Axelrod R. , Byhardt R. 
Published: March 2020

7529 Purpose: This analysis was conducted to address the potential antitumor effect of amifostine (AM) in NSCLC patients enrolled on RTOG-9801. The long-term survival results of RTOG-9801 are presented here. Methods: 243 patients (pts) with stage II/IIIAB NSCLC received induction paclitaxel (P) 225 mg/m2IV days 1, 22 and carboplatin (C) AUC 6 days 1, 22 and then concurrent weekly P (50 mg/m2) and C (AUC 2) and HRT (69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy BID). Pts were randomly assigned to AM 500 mg IV 4x/week or no-AM during chemoradiation. Treatment differences for overall and disease-free survival (OS & DFS) were analyzed with the log-rank test; Gray's test was used for time to progression (TTP). Results: 118 pts were randomly assigned to receive AM and 121 to no-AM (4 pts were ineligible). The median follow-up for pts still alive is 52.3 months (mo) for the AM-arm and 58.3 mo for the no-AM arm (16.6 vs 17.9 for all pts). There are no significant differences in OS, DFS or TTP between arms. The median survival, 3-yr, and 5-yr OS are 17.1 mo, 27% and 17% (AM-arm) vs 18.4 mo, 28% and 16% (no-AM arm) (p=0.97). Grade 3/4/5 late-RT toxicities are similar (11%/3%/2% AM-arm vs 14%/4%/2% no-AM arm). Conclusion: While an earlier publication reported that amifostine did not reduce objective measures of severe esophagitis in RTOG-9801, patient-reported outcome analyses suggested a possible advantage to AM with decreased pain and swallowing symptoms (J Clin Oncol 23:2145–2154, 2005). This long-term follow-up analysis on survival shows no evidence of tumor radioprotection due to amifostine. The promising 5-yr OS suggests that induction paclitaxel/carboplatin (P/C) followed by concurrent RT and weekly low-dose P/C is comparable to other regimens using cisplatin doublets at higher dosages every 3–4 weeks. Research supported by NCI and Medimmune Oncology. No significant financial relationships to disclose.