bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Retrospective analysis of cardiovascular (CV) events following compassionate use of carfilzomib (CFZ) in patients (Pts) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Authors: Atrash Shebli , Tullos Amanda , Panozzo Susan , Waheed Sarah , Van Rhee Frits , Restrepo Alejandro , Muzaffar Jameel , Bakhous Aziz , Grazziutti Monica , Shahid Zainab , Apewokin Senu , Abdallah Al-Ola A. , Barlogie Bart , Usmani Saad Zafar 
Published: March 2020

8595 Background: Herein, we report CV events observed in late-stage, heavily pretreated pts who received salvage CFZ under a compassionate use protocol. Methods: Pts received IV single-agent CFZ (20-45 mg/m2) over 2-30 min on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of a 28-day cycle (C) or CFZ with weekly dexamethasone (4-40 mg) during C1, along with other agents (eg, lenalidomide, thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, vorinostat) during C2 and beyond. CV events were grouped according to preferred terms. Serious CV events were defined as those that required hospitalization. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) values were measured at baseline; peak values were recorded during C1. Results: 143 pts (median age, 61 years old; 70% were male) received treatment. Prior to enrollment, pts received a median of 7 prior lines of therapy (range, 2-15), including doxorubicin (range, 0-360 mg/m2). Most pts (92%) had prior autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT), with 74% receiving ≥2 ASCT (range, 0-5). Pts received CFZ for a median of 2C (range, 1-36). Of pts with available BNP values at baseline and during C1 (n=69; 48.3%), the median peak BNP increase from baseline was 407 pg/ml (P<0.001). 27 pts (18.9%) experienced a serious CV event, 21 (77.7%) of which had preexisting CV risk factors. Of these 27 pts, 11 pts (7.7%) developed CHF or worsening of existing CHF (confirmed by echocardiogram [ECHO] ≤1 month from diagnosis), and 13 (9.1%) required hospitalization for hypotension (n=6), arrhythmia (n=2), hypertension (n=2), pulmonary edema (n=1), pulmonary embolism (n=1), or pulmonary hypertension (n=1). Additionally, 3 pts (2.1%) experienced cardiopulmonary arrest. Of the 11 CHF pts, 10 had a baseline ECHO (recorded ≤6 months before study); left ventricular ejection fraction decreased from a median of 55% (pretreatment) to 33% (posttreatment). Conclusions: Late-line, heavily pretreated pts with RRMM occasionally experienced CV events following administration of CFZ with or without other antimyeloma agents. Given the number of confounding factors and the uncontrolled nature of these data, causality for these CV events could not be definitively determined.
A comparison between next-generation sequencing and ASO-qPCR for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma.
Authors: Takamatsu Hiroyuki , Murata Ryoichi , Zheng Jianbiao , Moorhead Martin , Terasaki Yasushi , Yoshida Takashi , Faham Malek , Nakao Shinji 
Published: March 2020

8601 Background: Although molecular CR in multiple myeloma (MM) can be assessed by allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO)-PCR, this technique requires preparation of clonotype-specific primers for each individual which is laborious and time-consuming. The usage of the LymphoSIGHT method, a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based platform, may overcome these challenges and increase sensitivity and specificity. We compared the LymphoSIGHT approach with ASO-qPCR for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in autografts in the autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) setting. Methods: Seventeen Japanese patients with newly diagnosed MM who received various induction regimens prior to ASCT were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had achieved a PR or CR after ASCT. Bone marrow (BM) slides from 13 MM patients and fresh BM cells from 4 MM patients at diagnosis as well as autografts were obtained for DNA extraction. Using universal primer sets, we amplified IGH variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) gene segments, IGH-DJ, and IGK from genomic DNA. Amplified products were subjected to deep sequencing using NGS. Reads were analyzed using standardized algorithms for clonotype determination. Myeloma-specific clonotypes were identified for each patient based on their high frequency in BM samples. The presence of the myeloma clonotype was then assessed in follow-up samples. Results: MRD in autografts was detected in 6 of 17 (35%) by ASO-qPCR and 13 of 17 (76%) by NGS. When MRD was assessed by NGS, 6 MRD (+) cases received post-ASCT therapy while 4 MRD (-) cases and 7 MRD (+) cases were followed without post-ASCT therapy. The MRD (-) cases tended to show a better PFS than the MRD (+) cases with post-ASCT therapy (P = 0.26) and those without post-ASCT therapy (P = 0.09) although overall survival rates were comparable among the three groups. There was no difference in PFS between MRD (-) and MRD (+) cases when MRD was assessed by ASO-qPCR (P = 0.6). These studies will be extended in 30 additional MM patients, and results will be presented. Conclusions: MRD-negativity in autografts revealed by NGS may be more closely associated with durable remission of MM than that revealed by ASO-qPCR.
Genetic variation in immunomodulatory genes as markers of melanoma recurrence-free and overall survival.
Authors: Rendleman Justin , Shang Shulian , Shields Jerry , Adaniel Christina , Fleming Nathaniel H. , Shapiro Richard , Berman Russell S. , Pavlick Anna C. , Shao Yongzhao , Osman Iman , Kirchhoff Tomas 
Published: March 2020

9021 Background: Small reported studies have provided some evidence implicating immune related genes in melanoma susceptibility and prognosis; however candidate selection of these prior efforts has been limited. In this study, we performed an analysis of germline variants in immuno-modulatory genes for their association with melanoma survival in a well characterized cohort of prospectively accrued melanoma patients. Methods: Germline DNA isolated from blood samples of 817 melanoma patients was genotyped for 94 SNPs tagging 55 immuno-modulatory genes using Sequenom iPLEX. Cox models were used to test associations between each SNP and recurrence-free and overall survival (RFS and OS), with adjustments for age, gender, subtype, thickness, ulceration, and anatomic site. ROC curves were constructed from different SNP/clinical covariate combinations and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess their utility in the classification of 3-year recurrence. Results: The SNP rs2796817 in TGFB2 had strong associations with both RFS (HR=3.8, CI 95%: 1.3-11, p=0.02) and OS (HR=5.5, CI 95%: 1.6-19, p=0.029). Other interesting associations with OS came from IRF8 (rs4843861, HR=0.62, CI 95%: 0.39-0.99, p=0.017), CCL5 (rs4796120, HR=7.6, CI 95%: 2.3-25, p=0.035), and CD8A (rs3810831, HR=2.4, CI 95%: 0.91-6.2, p=0.048). A multivariate model including stage, subtype, and one of the SNPs (rs3810831 from CD8A), was shown to improve the AUC when compared to a model including only stage and subtype (0.77 vs. 0.79). Conclusions: We identified several immune-related loci associated with melanoma RFS and OS. The strongest association, rs2796817, maps in TGFB2, which among other functions suppresses IL-2 dependent T-cell growth. In addition to other associations found in the study these findings provide evidence for the involvement of immuno-modulatory genes in melanoma prognosis and suggest further investigations of immune related genes in disease progression. This is currently underway in the second stage validation analysis, which includes an expanded set of immune target genes as well as an additional independent cohort of melanoma patients.
Analysis of BRAF and NRAS mutation status in advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies: Association with overall survival?
Authors: Mangana Joanna , Goldinger Simone M. , Schindler Katja , Rozati Sima , Frauchiger Anna L. , Rechsteiner Markus , Moch Holger , Romano Emanuela , Kaehler Katharina C. , Michielin Olivier , Hauschild Axel , Hoeller Christoph , Dummer Reinhard 
Published: March 2020

9025 Background: Ipilimumab and tremelimumab are human monoclonal antibodies against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Ipilimumab was the first agent to show a statistically significant benefit in overall survival with durable-long-term responses for advanced melanoma patients both in first-and second-line setting. Up to date, there is no proven association between the BRAF-V600E mutation and the disease control rate (DCR) in response to Ipilimumab. Moreover, significantly shorter survival rates have been reported in patients harboring an NRAS mutation than in those without. This retrospective analysis was carried out to assess if BRAF (V600) and NRAS mutation status affects the clinical outcome of Ipilimumab-treated melanoma patients. Methods: This is a retrospective multi-center analysisof 71 patients, with confirmed BRAF and NRAS mutation status, treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies from December 2006 until August 2012. The cut-off for the estimation of overall survival was end of November 2012. Results: The median overall survival of BRAFV600/NRAS mutant patients (n=44) was 1,41 years compared with 2.67 years in BRAF/NRAS wild-type patients (n=27). Although this difference was not statistically significant there was a trend for improved survival in wild-type patients. Of the 71 patients analyzed, 56 received chemotherapy prior to Ipilimumab. In the BRAF/NRAS mutant cohort, 12 patients received Ipilimumab following either a BRAF- or a MEK- inhibitor. Of those 12 patients, 8 progressed and were unable to complete Ipilimumab. Of the 4 patients who completed 4 cycles of Ipilimumab, 2 were subsequently treated with a BRAF inhibitor. Furthermore out of the 71 patients, 8 patients received a BRAF or a MEK inhibitor after progression; 5 of them are still alive. Conclusions: This is the first retrospective study to evaluate the association of both BRAF and NRAS mutational status with the overall survival of Ipilimumab-treated patients. There was a trend towards an improved survival in the BRAF/NRAS wild-type subpopulation. Additional patients will be examined to foster these preliminary results.
Initial results from a phase I, open-label, dose escalation study of the oral BRAF inhibitor LGX818 in patients with BRAF V600 mutant advanced or metastatic melanoma.
Authors: Dummer Reinhard , Robert Caroline , Nyakas Marta , McArthur Grant A. , Kudchadkar Ragini Reiney , Gomez-Roca Carlos , Sullivan Ryan J. , Flaherty Keith , Murer Carla , Michel Daniela , Tang Zhongwen , De Parseval Laure A. , Delord Jean-Pierre 
Published: March 2020

9028 Background: LGX818, a potent and selective BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) being investigated in BRAF V600 mutant melanoma, has unique biochemical properties with a dissociation half-time > 10 times longer than other BRAF inhibitors. Methods: A phase I trial of LGX818 administered orally once (qd) or twice (bid) daily in BRAF V600 tumors was initiated to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and to assess pharmacokinetics and clinical activity in BRAFi–naive or pretreated patients with BRAF V600 mutant advanced melanoma. Baseline assessment of biomarkers from MAPK/PI3K pathways and pharmacodynamics were also evaluated. Results: Fifty-four patients have been enrolled in the dose-escalation phase (dose levels [DLs], 50-700 mg qd [n=42] and 75-150 mg bid [n=12]). LGX818 plasma concentrations increased proportionally by dose with a mean t1/2 of 4 hours and steady state in ≈ 15 days. The MTD/RP2D (450 mg qd) was well tolerated. Seven patients had a dose limiting toxicity (DLT): 5 at qd (1 each with hand-foot skin reaction [HFSR], foot pain, fatigue, diarrhea/rash, insomnia/asthenia) and 2 at bid (1 facial paresis/confusion, 1 musculoskeletal pain/neuralgia). All DLTs were grade 3 and reversible. The most common adverse events (≥ 20%) suspected to be treatment related were cutaneous (rash, dry skin, HFSR, pruritus, keratosis pilaris, alopecia), pain in extremity, arthralgia, and fatigue. Squamous cell carcinoma was observed in 2 patients (1 naive and 1 pretreated). As of 30 Sept 2012, the preliminary efficacy (all DLs) in patients with at least 1 postbaseline tumor assessment was 16 partial responses [PRs] (67%; 12 confirmed) out of 24 BRAFi–naive patients and 2 PRs (8.3%; 1 confirmed) among 24 BRAFi–pretreated patients. Responses were seen at all DLs from 50 to 550 mg qd. Updated safety and efficacy including time to event endpoints will be reported. Conclusions: Initial results from this study identified the MTD/RP2D as 450 mg/day and provided an early sign of promising activity in advanced melanoma. Expansion cohorts are ongoing in BRAFi–naive and BRAFi–pretreated melanoma and colorectal cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01436656.
Preliminary results from a phase Ib/II, open-label, dose-escalation study of the oral BRAF inhibitor LGX818 in combination with the oral MEK1/2 inhibitor MEK162 in BRAF V600-dependent advanced solid tumors.
Authors: Kefford Richard , Miller Wilson H , Tan Daniel Shao-Weng , Sullivan Ryan J. , Long Georgina , Dienstmann Rodrigo , Tai Wai Meng David , Flaherty Keith , Stutvoet Simone , Schumacher Karl Maria , Wandel Simon , De Parseval Laure A. , Tabernero Josep 
Published: March 2020

9029 Background: Clinical data indicate that combining a BRAF and a MEK inhibitor (BRAFi, MEKi) may be more effective than BRAFi monotherapy in BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma and that a MEKi may overcome or delay resistance to a BRAFi. Methods: This ongoing phase 1b/2 study is evaluating the combination of LGX818, a potent, selective BRAF inhibitor, and MEK162, a selective MEK1/2 inhibitor, in BRAFi-naive and -pretreated patients with BRAF-mutant tumors. The objective of the phase 1b part is to determine the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for oral, daily LGX818 + MEK162 in BRAF V600–mutant advanced solid tumors. A Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control guides the treatment dose escalation. Results: As of January 8, 2013, 20 patients (7 BRAFi-naive melanoma; 9 BRAFi-pretreated melanoma; 2 BRAFi-naive thyroid cancer; 1 BRAFi-naive metastatic colorectal cancer; 1 BRAFi-pretreated colorectal cancer) were treated with LGX818 qd + MEK162 bid at the following dose levels (DLs): 50 mg + 45 mg, 100 mg + 45 mg, 200 mg + 45 mg, and 400 mg + 45 mg. No dose-limiting toxicity has been observed at these DLs. The next DL of 600 mg + 45 mg is under investigation. The single agent RP2Ds for LGX818 and MEK162 are 450 mg and 45 mg, respectively. The most common adverse events (≥ 20%, all grades) suspected to be treatment related were nausea, abdominal pain, and headache. No events of fever, hand-foot-skin reactions, hyperkeratosis, or squamous cell carcinoma were observed. In patients with at least 1 post-baseline CT scan available for investigator-determined response, a complete response was observed in 1/7 (14%) BRAFi-naïve melanoma patients and partial responses were observed in 5/7 (71%) BRAFi-naive melanoma patients, 2/9 (22%) BRAFi-pretreated melanoma patients (starting at 50 mg + 45 mg DL), and 1/2 thyroid cancer patients. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this study indicate that LGX818 + MEK162 can be safely combined with promising clinical benefit. No febrile events or photosensitivity were reported suggesting a distinct safety profile for this BRAFi/MEKi combination vs others. Clinical trial information: NCT01543698.
Sunitinib versus dacarbazine as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.
Authors: Sacco Joseph J , Nathan Paul D. , Danson Sarah , Lorigan Paul , Nicholson Steve , Ottensmeier Christian , Corrie Philippa , Steven Neil , Goodman Andrew , Larkin James M. G. , Evans T. R. Jeffry , Kumar Satish , Coupland Sarah E , Silcocks Paul , Marshall Ernie 
Published: March 2020

9031 Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare cancer with a propensity for metastasis. There are no effective systemic therapies for metastatic UM, although dacarbazine is commonly used in practice. Sunitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against several targets including c-Kit and VEGF receptors, both of which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of UM. Methods: In this randomized multicentre, phase II study (SUAVE), patients (pts) with metastatic UM, ECOG PS 0-2, and no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease, were randomized 1:1 to sunitinib (50mg daily for 28 days, followed by a 14 day break), or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2once every 21 days). Crossover was permitted on progression. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included response rate and OS. A sample size of 124 was planned, with a power of 0.9 to detect an increase in 3 month PFS from 0.2 to 0.4 (HR: 0.563) and a one-sided alpha of 0.05. A preplanned futility analysis was performed after 50% of events, and recruitment stopped early, due to low conditional power (0.17% under current trend). Presentation of results was approved by DMC. Results: 74 pts from 12 centres were randomized over 24 months. Overall response rates of 0% and 8% were observed in the sunitinib and dacarbazine arms; while stable disease was observed in 24% of pts on sunitinib, and 11% on dacarbazine. PFS and OS were not improved with sunitinib (see Table). 11 pts in the sunitinib arm and 23 in the dacarbazine arm underwent crossover on progression. No unexpected AEs were observed, and no deaths due to toxicity occurred. Conclusions: In these preliminary results sunitinib did not have significant clinical activity in metastatic UM. This trial is one of the largest undertaken in metastatic UM and demonstrates that timely recruitment to collaborative multicentre randomized trials is achievable in this rare disease. Clinical trial information: 75033520. [Table: see text]
Final efficacy results of NCIC CTG IND.202: A randomized phase II study of recombinant interleukin-21 (rIL21) in patients with recurrent or metastatic melanoma (MM).
Authors: Petrella Teresa M. , Mihalcioiu Catalin Liviu Dragos , McWhirter Elaine , Belanger Karl , Savage Kerry J. , Song Xinni , Hamid Omid , Cheng Tina , Davis Mary L. , Lee Christopher W , Spatz Alan , Monzon Jose Gerard , Hagerman Linda , Chen Bingshu E , Dancey Janet 
Published: March 2020

9032 Background: rIL21 is a T-cell derived cytokine with antitumor activity dependent on NK cells or CD8+ T cells through induction of central and effector memory cells. A previous phase II study demonstrated an ORR of 22.5% in previously untreated patients with MM. We conducted a multicentre randomized phase II study of MM evaluating the efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarkers of rIL21 versus dacarbazine (DTIC). Methods: Eligible patients: Recurrent or MM, with either maximum tumour lesion size of < 50 mm or LDH < 2.5 x ULN and prior therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors allowed. Patients were treated with either rIL-21, 30 µg /kg/day dose IV daily x 5 days weeks 1, 3, 5 q 8 weeks or dacarbazine (DTIC) 1000 mg/m2 IV q 3 weeks. The primary objective was to compare progression free survival (PFS). The trial was designed to detect a hazard ratio of 1.75 with one-sided alpha of 0.1; 58 progression events were required to provide 80% power. Results: 64 patients were randomized, 32 in the rIL-21 arm and 32 in the DTIC arm. The Table summarizes key demographic and efficacy endpoints. Common rIl21 related adverse events were fatigue, rash, diarrhea, nausea, myalgia and elevated liver enzymes. At least one dose reduction/ interruption or discontinuation occurred in 32 (100%) and 27 (96.4%) of rIL21 and DTIC patients. Conclusions: Despite encouraging efficacy in prior phase I/II studies, the results suggest that rIL-21 is comparable to DTIC in this patient population. Additional biomarker analysis from this study is pending and combination studies are currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00514085. [Table: see text]
Vismodegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI), in advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC): STEVIE study interim analysis in 300 patients.
Authors: Grob Jean Jacques , Kunstfeld Rainer , Dreno Brigitte , Jouary Thomas , Mortier Laurent , Basset-Seguin Nicole , Ascierto Paolo Antonio , Hansson Johan , Mitchell Lada , Starnawski Michal , Hauschild Axel 
Published: March 2020

9036 Background: Therapy options are limited for locally advanced (la) and metastatic (m) BCC. Aberrant Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is the key driver in BCC pathogenesis. Vismodegib, a first-in-class HPI, is approved in the US for use in adults with aBCC. STEVIE is an ongoing study focusing on safety of vismodegib therapy in patients with aBCC. We present data from the third interim analysis (data cutoff: 19 October 2012), which also permits a preliminary assessment of efficacy of vismodegib in the largest study ever conducted in patients with aBCC. Methods: Adult patients with laBCC or mBCC received oral vismodegib 150 mg QD until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Safety is the primary objective of STEVIE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0). Secondary endpoints include efficacy variables. Recruitment is ongoing. Results: This analysis included 300 patients with locally advanced (n=278) or metastatic (n=22) BCC from 11 countries with potential for ≥3-month follow-up. Median treatment duration, including vismodegib interruption, was 176.5 days (range 1-455 days). Common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), typically ≤ grade 2, included muscle spasm (59.3%), alopecia (49.3%), and dysgeusia (41.0%) and were comparable to prior analysis. Serious TEAEs occurred in 53 patients (17.7%). 131 (43.7%) discontinued from the study, mainly due to patient or investigator request (n=41), AEs (n=35), disease progression (n=18) or death (n=13; 7 due to AEs assessed by the investigator as unrelated to study drug, 3 due to AEs not possible to be assessed, 3 due to disease progression). Preliminary best overall response in patients with available tumor assessments (n=251) included complete response (17.5%), partial response (39.8%), stable disease (39.0%) and progressive disease (2.8%). Patient recruitment and monitoring is ongoing. Conclusions: This third interim analysis of STEVIE confirms the previously observed vismodegib safety profile but can also provide further information about the high rate of tumor control with vismodegib in a large series of patients with aBCC. Clinical trial information: 2011-000195-34.