The Biological Inferences from the Ranking of SF3B1 Mutations in the Clonal Hierarchy of Myeloid Neoplasia
Authors: Awada Hassan , Durrani Jibran , Kishtagari Ashwin , Adema Vera , Kerr Cassandra M , Kongkiatkamon Sunisa , Przychodzen Bartlomiej , Khouri Jack , Rogers Heesun J. , Meggendorfer Manja , Advani Anjali S. , Nazha Aziz , Haferlach Torsten , Carraway Hetty E. , Sekeres Mikkael A. , Maciejewski Jaroslaw P. , Visconte Valeria 
Published: November 2019

Chromosomal abnormalities can be founder lesions (e.g., t (8; 21), inv (16), inv (3)), initiate or advance disease progression (both founder and secondary hits e.g., ASXL1, TP53, RUNX1) or can be obligatory secondary hits (FLT3, NPM1). Hence, the rank of these mutations may determine the biological properties and clinical outcomes. However, while many mechanistic studies have been undertaken without identifying the key pathogenetic factors resulting from SF3B1 mutations, important biological clues can be derived from the consequences of SF3B1 alterations in the context of the clonal architecture of myeloid neoplasia (MN). SF3B1 mutant patients often have a homogeneous phenotype with isolated erythroid dysplasia, ring sideroblasts (RS) and favorable prognoses. Studies in primary MDS cells have suggested that SF3B1 mutations are initiating lesions and provide a marked clonal advantage to MDS-RS cells by propagating from rare lympho-myeloid hematopoietic stem cells. However, there is significant diversity of clinical phenotypes and outcomes including the observation that the disappearance of RS can be observed during the disease course of clonal MN and might suggest cellular shifts due to acquisition of additional hits. In such scenarios, the cell's fate in the context of SF3B1 mutations is pre-defined by the predominance of expanded hits.
We took advantage of our detailed database of molecularly and clinical annotated cases with MN to study the SF3B1 mutatome and describe whether the clonal nature (ancestral vs. secondary) might change the clinical and phenotypic trajectories of MDS cells and whether the concatenation of mutations decreases the competitiveness of SF3B1 clones, leading to the dominance of other driver genes and subsequently to clonal evolution. The clonal hierarchy was resolved using our in-house designed VAF-based bioanalytic method and confirmed by the PyClone pipeline, which showed a high level of concordance. We first assigned clonal hierarchy to SF3B1 mutations by using VAFs (adjusted for copy number and zygosity) and classifying the mutations into dominant (if a cutoff of at least 5% difference between VAFs existed), secondary (any subsequent sub-clonal hit) and co-dominant hits (if the difference of VAFs between two mutations was <5%). In total, we identified 140 dominant (SF3B1DOM), 121 secondary (SF3B1SEC) and 74 co-dominant SF3B1 mutations. For the purpose of this study, we set aside co-dominant SF3B1 mutations. Focusing on SF3B1DOM and SF3B1SEC, SF3B1DOM were often associated with a normocellular bone marrow compared to SF3B1SEC (n=42 vs. 26; P=0.02) and were less likely enriched in multi-dysplastic myeloid cells (29% vs. 53%; P=0.01). As such, SF3B1DOM tended to be more frequently detected in lower-risk MDS (P=0.05) in the subtypes of MDS-RS and MLD-RS (RS≥15%: 67% vs. 41%; P=0.01) compared to other disease subtypes. Twenty-three percent of patients with SF3B1SEC had secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) (P=0.03). SF3B1SEC patients tended to have a lower median platelet count than patients with SF3B1DOM (97 vs. 130 x 109/L; P=0.05). SF3B1SEC was also more associated with bi-cytopenia compared to SF3B1DOM (52% vs. 36%; P=0.01). No specific association was found between SF3B1 clonal nature and cytogenetic abnormalities, suggesting that additional mutations might be the main contributors in the evolution of MDS to AML. Of note, patients with SF3B1SEC had half OS compared to patients with SF3B1DOM (SF3B1SECvs. SF3B1DOM: 15.9 mo. vs. 39.7 mo., P= 0.0001), suggesting that in cases evolving to AML, expanding hits might have dramatically skewed the favorable nature of SF3B1 mutations. Indeed, mutations preceding SF3B1 mainly affected lineage-restricted genes associated with repression of erythroid programs (RUNX1, 23%), terminal monocytic differentiation (TET2, 9%), transcriptional corepressors (BCOR/L1, 8%) and development of leukemia (DNMT3A, 8%).
In conclusion, our study of the clonal architecture of SF3B1 mutations highlights that clonal progression of cases with MN harboring SF3B1 mutations might be inferred by the rank of additional genetic lesions cooperating with SF3B1.

Disclosures
Meggendorfer: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Advani:Abbvie: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Nazha:Tolero, Karyopharma: Honoraria; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; MEI: Other: Data monitoring Committee; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmacutical: Research Funding; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sekeres:Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:Alexion: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.