Incidence ofBrucellaspp. in various livestock species raised under the pastoral production system in Isiolo County, Kenya
Authors: Njeru Josiah , Nthiwa Daniel , Akoko James , Oyas Harry , Bett Bernard 
Published: June 2020

AbstractBackgroundBrucellosis is an important zoonosis with a worldwide distribution. The disease is caused by multiple species ofBrucellathat can infect a wide range of mammalian hosts. In the sub-Saharan Africa, many studies have been implemented to determine the prevalence of the disease in livestock, but not much is known about its incidence. We implemented a longitudinal study to determine the incidence ofBrucellaspp. infection in cattle, camels, sheep and goats that were being raised in a pastoral area in Isiolo County, northern Kenya.MethodsAn initial cross-sectional survey was implemented to identify unexposed animals for follow up; that survey used 141 camels, 216 cattle, 208 sheep and 161 goats. A subsequent longitudinal study recruited 31 cattle, 22 sheep, 32 goats and 30 camels for follow up. All the samples collected were screened forBrucellaspp. using the Rose Bengal Plate test (RBPT), a modified RBPT, and an indirect multispecies Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (iELISA) kit. Samples that tested positive by any of these serological tests were further tested using real-time PCR-based assays to detect genusBrucellaDNA and identifyBrucellaspecies. These analyses targeted thealkBandBMEI1162genes forB. abortus,andB. melitensis,respectively. The longitudinal study took 12 months and data were analysed using Cox proportional hazards model that accounted for clustering of observations within herds. Changes in anti-BrucellaIgG optical values between successive sampling periods were determined to confirm primary exposures.ResultsThe mean incidence rate ofBrucellaspp. was 0.024 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.014 – 0.037) cases per animal-months at risk.Brucellaspp. incidence in camels, cattle, goats and sheep were 0.053 (0.022 – 0.104), 0.028 (0.010 – 0.061), 0.013 (0.003 – 0.036) and 0.006 (0.0002 – 0.034) cases per animal-month at risk, respectively. A higher incidence rate ofBrucellaspp. was found among females (0.020, 0.009 – 0.036) than males (0.016, 0.004 – 0.091), while young animals (0.026, 95% CI; 0.003 – 0.097) had a slightly higher incidence rate compared to adults (0.019, 95% CI; 0.009 – 0.034). RT PCR analyses showed thatB. abortuswas more prevalent thanB. melitensisin the area. The results of multivariable Cox regression analysis identified species (camels and cattle) as an important predictor ofBrucellaspp. exposure in animals. On the diagnostic tests, modified RBPT provided similar findings as the iELISA test.ConclusionsOur findings indicated that camels and cattle have a higher incidence ofBrucellaspp. exposure than the other livestock species. This could be due to the higher prevalence ofB. abortus,which readily infects these species, thanB. melitensis.More studies are underway to identify ecological factors that influence the persistence of the keyBrucellaspecies in the area. The study further concluded that modified RBPT test can give reliable results as those of a formal iELISA test, and it can therefore be used for routine surveillance in the region.Author summaryBrucellosis is a neglected disease that is endemic in many pastoral areas. This study describes the incidence patterns ofBrucellaspp. in various livestock species (cattle, camels, sheep and goats) in Kinna in Isiolo County, northern Kenya. We also evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity of three serological tests; RBPT, a modified RBPT and an iELISA test in the diagnosis of brucellosis in animals that were suspected to be naturally exposed. Results from this study showed that both cattle and camels had a significantly higher incidence ofBrucellaspp. compared to sheep and goats. The number of animals found to be seropositive forBrucellaspp. by the modified RBPT and iELISA did not differ significantly. Both tests also detected a significantly higher number of seropositive animals than RBPT. This finding confirms that the modified RBPT provides comparable results as iELISA, which is known to have higher sensitivity and specificity, and therefore the former can be used for more surveillance activities in pastoral areas.