bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Escalated dosing schedules of CC-486 for patients experiencing first acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse: Results from the phase III QUAZAR AML-001 maintenance trial.
Authors: Dohner Hartmut , Wei Andrew , Montesinos Pau , Dombret Hervé , Ravandi Farhad , Sayar Hamid , Porkka Kimmo , Sandhu Irwindeep , Passamonti Francesco , Pane Fabrizio , Robak Tadeusz , Falantes Jose F. , Schuh Andre C. , Ossenkoppele Gert J. , La Torre Ignazia , Skikne Barry , Kumar Keshava , Dong Qian , Beach C. L. , Roboz Gail J. 
Published: May 2020

7513 Background: A goal of AML maintenance therapy is to decrease the risk of relapse by suppressing growth of residual leukemic cells post-induction. CC-486 is an oral hypomethylating agent that allows for extended dosing schedules ( >7 days [d]/28d cycle) to sustain therapeutic activity. In the QUAZAR AML-001 trial (NCT01757535), CC-486 maintenance treatment (Tx) significantly prolonged overall (OS) and relapse-free survival vs. placebo (PBO) in pts with AML in first remission following induction chemotherapy (IC), who were not candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Pts initially received CC-486 or PBO for 14d/cycle, but pts who relapsed with 5–15% blasts could receive escalated 21d/cycle dosing. We review outcomes of pts who received 21d dosing in QUAZAR AML-001. Methods: Pts were aged ≥ 55 years, with intermediate- or poor-risk cytogenetics and ECOG PS ≤ 3, and had achieved first CR/CRi after IC ± consolidation. Within 4 mo of CR/CRi, pts were randomized 1:1 to CC-486 300 mg or PBO QD on d 1–14 of 28d Tx cycles. CR/CRi status was assessed every 3 cycles. Pts relapsing with 5%–15% blasts in blood or bone marrow could receive study drug for 21d/cycle at the investigator’s discretion. Tx could continue until > 15% blasts, unacceptable toxicity, or HSCT. Results: 91 patients (CC-486, 51/238 [21%]; PBO, 40/234 [17%]) were assigned to ≥ 1 21d/cycle dosing schedule. Median time to dose escalation was 9.2 mo (range 1.0-52.7) for CC-486 and 6.0 mo (0.5-19.3) for PBO. Median number of 21d dosing cycles was 2.0 (range 1-45) in the CC-486 arm and 2.0 (1-16) in the PBO arm; 43% and 18% of pts, respectively, received > 3 cycles of 21d dosing. Among 78 evaluable pts, 10/43 (23%) CC-486 pts and 4/35 (11%) PBO pts regained CR/CRi (central review) during dose escalation. Median OS from randomization was 22.8 mo vs. 14.6 mo with CC-486 vs. PBO, respectively (HR 0.66 [95%CI 0.42, 1.0]; P = 0.073), and 1-year survival rates were 80.4% vs. 59.5% (+20.9% [95%CI 2.1%, 39.7%]). The most common AEs with first onset during 21d dosing were febrile neutropenia (CC-486 24%, PBO 3%), thrombocytopenia (22%, 23%), anemia (22%, 20%), and neutropenia (20%, 10%). Conclusions: Escalated 21d CC-486 dosing was well tolerated and resulted in prolongation of OS and restoration of remission in approximately one-fourth of pts. Hematologic AEs first reported during escalated dosing in both Tx arms may be due in part to disease relapse. A 21d dosing schedule should be considered for pts receiving CC-486 who experience relapse with 5–15% blasts. Clinical trial information: NCT01757535 .
CC-486 is safe and well-tolerated as maintenance therapy in elderly patients (≥75 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission following induction chemotherapy: Results from the phase III QUAZAR AML-001 trial.
Authors: Ravandi Farhad , Wei Andrew , Dohner Hartmut , Dombret Hervé , Ossenkoppele Gert J. , Pfeilstöcker Michael , Thol Felicitas , Feldman Georg , Voso Maria Teresa , Marlton Paula , Harvey Michael , Santini Valeria , Fianchi Luana , Candoni Anna , La Torre Ignazia , Skikne Barry , Kumar Keshava , Dong Qian , Beach C. L. , Roboz Gail J. 
Published: May 2020

7530 Background: About 40-50% of older patients (pts) with AML attain complete remission (CR) with induction chemotherapy (IC) but relapse is common.Effective, well-tolerated maintenance treatment (Tx) is needed for older pts in remission who are not eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). CC-486 is an oral hypomethylating agent that allows for extended dosing schedules ( >7 days [d]/cycle) to sustain therapeutic activity. In the phase III placebo (PBO)-controlled QUAZAR AML-001 trial (NCT01757535), CC-486 maintenance therapy in pts with AML in first remission following IC produced significant improvements in overall and relapse-free survival. Here we report safety and tolerability findings among pt subgroups defined by age at study entry. Methods: Eligible pts were ≥ 55 yrs of age, with de novo or secondary AML, intermediate or poor risk cytogenetics, and ECOG PS ≤ 3; had achieved first CR or CRi after IC ± consolidation; and were not candidates for HSCT. Within 4 mo of CR/CRi, pts were randomized 1:1 to CC-486 300 mg or PBO QD on d 1–14 of repeated 28d Tx cycles. Safety was assessed across 3 age subgroups (≥ 55 to < 65, ≥ 65 to < 75, and ≥ 75 yrs) in pts who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug. Adverse events (AEs) were coded using MedDRA v. 22.0 and graded by NCI-CTCAE v. 4.0. Results: 469 pts ( >99% of all enrolled pts) were evaluable for safety (CC-486 n = 236; PBO n = 233). Median age was 68 yrs (range 55-86). Age distribution was similar between the two Tx arms (Table). Between Tx arms, AE rates within each age stratum were similar to rates in the overall study population. The most common AEs (any grade) with CC-486 were GI events, which were more frequent than in the PBO arm across age groups. Within the CC-486 arm, AE rates were generally consistent across age groups, except for constipation, which was > 20% more frequent in pts aged ≥ 75 yrs, and thrombocytopenia, which was ≥ 20% less frequent in this group (Table). Overall, 13% and 4% of pts in the CC-486 and PBO groups discontinued Tx due to AEs. Conclusions: In QUAZAR AML-001, CC-486 was generally well tolerated in all age groups, including elderly pts aged ≥ 75 yrs. Clinical trial information: NCT01757535 . [Table: see text]
FACT physical wellbeing to independently predict overall survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Authors: Peipert John , Efficace Fabio , Pierson Renee F. , Yount Susan , Loefgren Christina , Cella David , He Jianming 
Published: May 2020

7532 Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) predict overall survival (OS) in solid cancer populations, but little evidence exists around the prognostic value of PROs in patients with hematologic malignancies. We investigated whether scales from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Leukemia (FACT-Leu) predicted OS beyond established prognostic factors. Methods: Data were from 317 AML patients unfit for intensive therapy from a clinical trial comparing Dacogen (decitabine) plus Talacotuzumab versus Dacogen (decitabine) alone (AML2002; NCT02472145). We used ridge-penalized Cox models to determine whether baseline (1st cycle) FACT-Leu scales predicted OS. FACT-Leu scales significant in these models and factors from a validated prognostic model, the AML composite model (AML-CL; covariates listed in Table), were entered into Cox proportional hazard models. Lastly, model selection procedures were run with 1000 bootstrapped samples using all variables. The inclusion frequency of each FACT-Leu scale in the final models was examined to evaluate prognostic value for OS (i.e., higher the % of inclusion, higher importance of the variable). Results: In the ridge-penalized Cox models, the Physical Wellbeing Scale (PWB), Trial Outcome Index (TOI), and FACT-Leu Total scales were significant predictors of OS. After adjusting for the AML-CL factors, an important difference (2 pts) in PWB score was associated with a 9% decline in OS. (Table) Model validity was evidenced as the PWB scale appeared in a large majority of selected models (90%-97%), while the TOI (45%-73%) and FACT-Leu Total (41%-71%) appeared less often. Conclusions: FACT-Leu scales, especially the PWB, were significant prognostic factors for OS among AML patients not suitable for intensive therapy. These results may indicate PROs' value as stratification factors in trials with AML patients and underscore the need to more systematically collect PRO data in routine care practice with AML patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02472145 . [Table: see text]
Meta-analysis of case-control studies to examine the relationship between occupational pesticide exposure and risk of acute myeloid leukemia.
Authors: Vallet Nicolas , Foucault Amélie , Picou Frederic , Gyan Emmanuel , Herault Olivier 
Published: May 2020

7540 Background: Occupational pesticide exposure (OPE) is associated with the risk of developing lymphoid malignancies, but less information is available on large cohorts about the risk of occurrence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To answer this question, we performed a meta-analysis including relevant adult case-control studies which reported OPE. Methods: Following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, two investigators performed a systematic search in PubMed and Cochrane databases for case-control studies evaluating the association between OPE and AML between 1946 and August 28, 2018. In order to identify the maximum number of studies, keywords related to demographical, pesticides and chemicals data exposures were used. Studies reporting AML diagnosis based only on death certificates, controls from cancer databases and pediatric cases (<15 years-old) were not included. Statistical analyses were performed with R software and the ‘mefafor’ package. Results: Fifteen studies which included 4,068 AML patients and 250,975 control subjects were included. Using a random effects model, the overall analysis showed a significant adverse association between OPE and AML with OR=1.49 (95%CI: 1.10-2.01), and a significant heterogeneity between studies ( I² =0.73, p<0.001). The robustness was checked after sequential exclusion of one study at a time which did not influence the overall OR estimate. A publication bias underestimating the OR was suggested by an asymmetrical funnel plot. Using trim-and-fill method, hypothetical missing studies were added studies in order to adjust the OR (OR=1.76 [95%CI: 1.30-2.38]. A stratified analysis showed that the association was significant in Asian populations (OR=1.74; 95%CI: 1.32-2.30) and upon exposure to insecticides (OR=1.45; 95%CI: 1.16-1.81), yet partly influenced by other factors, since most of the studies reported unadjusted results (n=8, 53%). Data on biological characteristics were unavailable to stratify patients according to AML molecular or cytogenetic characteristics. Conclusions: From this new extensive review and analysis, it clearly appears that AML should be considered as occupational illness in patients with demonstrated OPE. Further studies will have to focus on the biological effects of individual and pesticides cocktails in order to determine the pathogenesis mechanisms involved in leukemogenesis, and to improve individual protection.
Phase I study of the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax with DA-EPOCH-R as initial therapy for aggressive B-cell lymphomas.
Authors: Rutherford Sarah C. , Abramson Jeremy S. , Bartlett Nancy L. , Barta Stefan K. , Khan Nadia , Joyce Robin , Maddocks Kami J. , Yuan Ying , Ali-Shaw Trisha , Senese Silvia , Westin Jason , Leonard John Paul 
Published: May 2020

8003 Background: Dose-adjusted (DA) EPOCH-R is a frontline treatment for aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Bcl-2 is associated with chemoresistance due to BCL2 gene rearrangement or protein overexpression in lymphomas and is antagonized by BH3 mimetic venetoclax (ven). We conducted a phase I study combining ven with DA-EPOCH-R in aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Methods: This phase 1 study used Bayesian optimal interval design with dose expansion. Eligible patients (pts) were 18 years with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), primary mediastinal, and high grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) with double hit (DHL) or not otherwise specified (NOS). Ven was dosed at 400 mg (DL1), 600 mg (DL2), and 800 mg (DL3) daily for 10 days with 6 cycles of DA-EPOCH-R. A subsequent cohort received ven 600 mg daily for 5 days (DL2B). Toxicities were graded by CTCAE v4.0 and response assessed by Lugano criteria. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period was cycle 1 and primarily included grade (gr) ≥3 neutropenia on cycle 2 day 1, gr ≥4 febrile neutropenia/thrombocytopenia, and gr ≥3 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea despite supportive care. Results: 30 pts enrolled with median age 64 (24-79), and 50% female. Ann Arbor stage was III-IV in 23. IPI was high risk in > 50%. Diagnosis was DHL (15), DLBCL NOS (13), and HGBCL NOS (2). 18 had MYC and 14 had BCL2 rearrangements. Bcl-2 was expressed ≥50% by IHC in 21/26 with data. There were no DLTs in DL1 (3 pts) or DL2 (9 pts). 1/6 had DLT in DL3 (gr 4 thrombocytopenia). Ven dose reductions occurred in subsequent cycles in 4 (2 in DL2; 2 in DL3). Of 18 in DL1-3, EPOCH was escalated above level 1 in 1 and de-escalated below level 1 in 7. Because of delays and ven dose reductions in DL2-3 due in part to cytopenias, infections and GI toxicities, we accrued DL2B. In DL2B, 0/12 pts had DLTs or ven dose reductions. EPOCH was escalated above level 1 in 4 and de-escalated below level 1 in 3. 1 died of sepsis during cycle 3. Most common gr 3-4 toxicities across all dose levels were cytopenias; febrile neutropenia occurred in 57%. Most common non-hematologic toxicities of all grades were hypocalcemia, nausea, diarrhea, hypokalemia and fatigue. ORR (N = 30) ITT was 97% with 27 (90%) complete and 2 (7%) partial responses; 1 was not evaluable. Follow up is ongoing. Of 15 DHL, ORR and CRR were 93% and 80%. Conclusions: We identified ven 600 mg for 5 days per cycle as RP2D with DA-EPOCH-R. DL2B was well tolerated and required no ven dose reductions. Further efficacy and safety is being evaluated in Alliance 51701, DA-EPOCH-R/R-CHOP in DH/double expressor lymphomas, using the dosing regimen defined by this study. Clinical trial information: NCT03036904 .
Phase II, multicenter trial of nivolumab (Nivo) and brentuximab vedotin (BV) in patients (Pts) with untreated Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) over the age of 60 years or unable to receive standard ABVD chemotherapy: Results of a study of Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) RU051505I.
Authors: Cheson Bruce D. , Bartlett Nancy L. , LaPlant Betsy , Lee Hun Ju , Advani Ranjana H. , Christian Beth , Magid Diefenbach Catherine S. , Feldman Tatyana , Ansell Stephen M. 
Published: May 2020

8014 Background: HL is highly curable with > 90% of pts with limited and > 80% with advanced stage disease experiencing long-term disease-free survival. HL typically occurs in younger pts, yet 15-35% are > 60 yrs and experience a lower response rate, shorter survival, and greater toxicity. BV and checkpoint inhibitors have impressive activity in pts with relapsed and refractory HL. Thus, we initiated a phase II trial of BV-nivo in untreated pts with HL >60 yrs of age or considered unsuitable for standard ABVD therapy. Methods: Inclusion criteria: previously untreated pts with classical HL > 60 yrs or < 60 yrs but considered unsuitable for standard chemotherapy because of a cardiac ejection fraction of < 50%, diffusion capacity < 80%, or creatinine clearance > 30 but < 60 mL/min, or refused chemotherapy; ECOG PS 0-2, ANC >1500/mm3, platelets > 100,000/mm3, hemoglobin > 9 g/dl, bilirubin <1.5 x upper limits of normal (ULN), aspartate/alanine transaminases < 2.5 x ULN, amylase and/or lipase < 1.5 x ULN, and serum creatinine < 2.0 mg/dl. Pts received BV at 1.8 mg/kg (cap at 180 mg) and nivo 3 mg/kg every 21 days for 8 cycles. Response was assessed per the Lugano Classification. Results: The study accrued 46 pts between May 13, 2016-January 30, 2019. Median age of 71.5 yrs, 69.5% had ECOG PS 1 or 2; 64% stage III or IV; 39.1% with B symptoms; 4.3% were < 60 years. Median follow-up was 21.2 months (range 2.9, 38.5), and 35 pts (76.1%) completed all 8 cycles of therapy. At the interim analysis (1st 25 pts) ORR was 64% (52% mCR, 12% pMR) which was lower than the projected 80%. In all 46 pts, 45.7% achieved mCR and 15.2% mPR (ORR 60.9%); in evaluable pts, best ORR was 95% with 68% mCR. No clinical factors predicted response. Neither median duration of response nor median survival has been reached. Median PFS is 21.8 months (17.8, Not reached). 22 pts experienced 33 treatment delays, primarily due to BV. 22 pts experienced peripheral neuropathy (5 grade 3). Grade 4 toxicities included increased transaminases (n = 1), increased lipase and/or amylase (n = 2), pancreatitis (1). One pt died from cardiac arrest, possibly treatment-related. Conclusions: BV-nivo is active in untreated older HL pts with comorbidities. However, efficacy and response durability did not meet pre-specified criteria. Future trials based on these drugs, selecting pts most likely to benefit, may lead to a chemo-free approach for pts with HL. Clinical trial information: NCT02758717 .
Results of a completed phase I study of LAM-002 (apilimod dimesylate), a first-in-class phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate 5 kinase (PIKfyve) inhibitor, administered as monotherapy or with rituximab or atezolizumab to patients with previously treated follicular lymphoma or other B-cell cancers.
Authors: Magid Diefenbach Catherine S. , Cohen Jonathan B , Harb Wael A. , Ansell Stephen M. , Nastoupil Loretta J. , Abramson Jeremy S. , Lakhani Nehal J. , Schreeder Marshall T. , Sher Taimur , Patel-Donnelly Dipti , Aboulafia David Michael , Fuchs Candace A. , Nix Darrell , Landrette Sean , Graham Patricia S , King Lydia B , Young Peter L. , Miller Langdon L. , Lichenstein Henri , Rutherford Sarah C. 
Published: May 2020

8017 Background: LAM-002 is a selective inhibitor of PIKfyve that disrupts lysosomal homeostasis, inducing cytotoxicity in B-cell lymphoma models as monotherapy or with anti-CD20 or anti-PDL1 antibodies (Gayle et al., Blood 2017;129(13):1768). Methods: In this study, patients received LAM-002 orally 2-3 times per day (BID or TID) in a 3+3 escalation. Additional patients received LAM-002 125 mg BID as monotherapy; with rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) and or subcutaneously weekly (Q1W) x 4 → Q8W x 4; or atezolizumab 1200 mg IV Q3W until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were assessed for 8 hours postdose on Days 1 and 8. Efficacy was evaluated Q6-12W. Results: The study enrolled 62 patients (M:F n = 32/30); median [range] age = 69 [46-89] years; with diagnoses (n) of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (25), follicular lymphoma (19), marginal zone lymphoma (8), mantle cell lymphoma (5), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (5) to receive LAM-002 alone (n) at 50 mg BID (3), 100 mg BID (8), 150 mg BID (8), 75 mg TID (4), or 125 mg BID (20); LAM-002/rituximab (12); or LAM-002/atezolizumab (7). During LAM-002 dose-ranging (50 mg BID → 100 mg BID → 150 mg BID → 75 mg TID → 125 mg BID) transient, reversible nausea and/or diarrhea occurred at 150 mg BID and 75 mg TID, resulting in a LAM-002 recommended Phase 2 dosing regimen (RP2DR) of 125 mg BID. Among 39 patients receiving LAM-002, 125 mg BID, alone or in combination for up to 22 cycles (1.9 years), adverse events were typically low-grade. LAM-002 PK showed rapid absorption, dose proportionality, minimal accumulation, and no substantive changes with rituximab or atezolizumab coadministration. In patients with follicular lymphoma and median [range] prior therapies = 3 [1-9] treated with the RP2DR, objective response rates were 2/7 (29%; 1 complete response [CR], 1 partial response [PR]) with LAM-002, 5/8 (63%; 1 CR, 4 PRs) with LAM-002/rituximab, and 2/2 (100%; 2 PRs) with LAM-002/atezolizumab. Conclusions: LAM-002, the first clinical PIKfyve inhibitor, is safe alone or with full-dose anti-CD20 or anti-PD-L1 inhibition. LAM-002 does not cause the myelosuppressive or immune adverse events associated with lenalidomide or PI3K inhibitors. Promising efficacy supports registration-directed Phase 2/3 testing of LAM-002 monotherapy and combination therapy for patients with previously treated follicular lymphoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02594384 .
RE-MIND study: A propensity score-based 1:1 matched comparison of tafasitamab + lenalidomide (L-MIND) versus lenalidomide monotherapy (real-world data) in transplant-ineligible patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Authors: Nowakowski Grzegorz S. , Rodgers Thomas David , Marino Dario , Frezzato Maurizio , Barbui Anna Maria , Castellino Claudia , Meli Erika , Fowler Nathan Hale , Feinberg Bruce A. , Tillmanns Sascha , Parche Stephan , Fingerle-Rowson Guenter , Winderlich Mark , Ambarkhane Sumeet Vijay , Salles Gilles A. , Zinzani Pier Luigi 
Published: May 2020

8020 Background: Patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) have a poor prognosis. In these patients, tafasitamab (anti-CD19 antibody) plus lenalidomide (LEN) has shown encouraging results in the open-label, single-arm, phase II L-MIND study (n = 81; NCT02399085). To evaluate the contribution of tafasitamab to the activity of this doublet, we conducted a global, real-world study of patients treated with LEN monotherapy (RE-MIND; NCT04150328). Here we present the primary analysis of a 1:1 patient-level matched comparison between the L-MIND and RE-MIND cohorts. Methods: Patients treated with LEN monotherapy for R/R DLBCL were enrolled in the observational, retrospective RE-MIND cohort. As in L-MIND, patients had 1–3 prior systemic therapies, including ≥1 CD20-targeting regimen; were aged ≥18 years; and were not eligible for ASCT. A 1:1 estimated propensity score (ePS) matching methodology ensured balancing of nine pre-specified baseline covariates. The primary analysis set, Matched Analysis Set 25 (MAS25), included patients who received a LEN starting dose of 25 mg/day. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed best objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and complete response (CR) rate. Results: 490 patients were enrolled in RE-MIND across 58 centers in the US and Europe, of which 140 fulfilled the ePS matching criteria. The MAS25 included 76 patients each from the two cohorts. Baseline characteristics between cohorts were comparable. The primary endpoint was met with a significantly better ORR of 67.1% (95% CI: 55.4–77.5) for the L-MIND cohort versus 34.2% (95% CI: 23.7–46.0) for the RE-MIND cohort (odds ratio 3.89; 95% CI: 1.90–8.14; p < 0.0001). The CR rate was 39.5% (95% CI: 28.4–51.4) in the L-MIND cohort and 13.2% (95% CI: 6.5–22.9) in the RE-MIND cohort. A significant difference in OS favored the L-MIND cohort (HR = 0.499; 95% CI: 0.317–0.785). ORR and CR outcomes in the RE-MIND cohort were similar to the published literature for LEN monotherapy in R/R DLBCL. Conclusions: Significantly better ORR, CR and OS indicate potential synergistic effects of the tafasitamab + LEN combination in ASCT-ineligible R/R DLBCL. ePS-based 1:1 matching allows robust estimation of the treatment effect of tafasitamab when added to LEN. RE-MIND demonstrates the utility of real-world data in interpreting non-randomized trials. Clinical trial information: NCT04150328 .