Abstract P2-13-13: For women with bone-only metastatic breast cancer, is there a benefit to primary prevention?
Authors: Fanucci Kristina A , Fenton Mary Anne , Duffy Christine , Higel-McGovern Camille , Dizon Don 
Published: March 2020

Abstract
Background: The prognosis of patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) bone-only metastatic breast cancer (B-MBC) is good, with the average life expectancy extending years with contemporary management. In the general population, studies investigating the impact of screening programs designed to detect disease as early as possible in otherwise asymptomatic patients have consistently shown reduction in morbidity and mortality but outcomes among patients living with B-MBC has not been adequately addressed. This study aimed to investigate the rate at which patients with ER+ breast cancer metastatic only to bone underwent cholesterol, breast cancer, colon cancer, and lung cancer screening and to determine if this screening had any impact on overall survival and cause of death.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated for ER+ B-MBC at the Lifespan Cancer Institute in Providence, RI between 1/1/15 and 5/31/18. Each patient’s medical records and tumor registry information were reviewed. Data on these patients’ disease history were collected along with data on cholesterol, breast cancer, colon cancer, and lung cancer screening. Descriptive statistics were calculated using STATA statistical software.
Results: A total of 48 patients with ER+ B-MBC were identified. Median overall survival from initial diagnosis of breast cancer was 148 months; measured from the diagnosis of bone metastasis, it was 52.4 months. Twenty-nine out of the 48 patients received cholesterol screening (60%), 14/48 had mammograms (29%), and only 8/48 had colonoscopy (17%). No patients underwent screening lung CT (Table 1). Compared to those who did not undergo screening, patients who were screened for cholesterol had significantly longer median overall survival (175.4 vs 106 months, respectively, p=.02) and those undergoing mammogram had a trend towards longer survival (187 vs 131 months, p=.08). Screening was not associated with a difference in rates of death attributed to breast cancer. No deaths due to other malignancies were identified. Of those undergoing mammography, only one abnormal report was identified, and biopsy of the lesion was benign.
Table 1: Rate of abnormal screening results, median overall survival from index diagnosis, and death from index breast cancer.Abnormal screening resultMedian OS (months)95% CIp valueDeath from IBCp valueCholesterolscreened18/25175.4135 - 2160.02**1/20.30not screened10668 - 1445/6Mammogramscreened1/14187116 - 2590.08*3/40.60not screened131101 - 1626/10OS=overall survival. CI=confidence interval. IBC=index breast cancer. ** = p &lt; 0.05. *= p &lt; 0.1
Conclusions: A large proportion of patients with B-MBC undergo primary preventative screening measures, and of these, cholesterol screening is the most common. Screening was associated with longer overall survival, but did not change the rates of death due to breast cancer. These results suggest that clinicians are offering screening to a subgroup of women who are healthy despite B-MBC. However, our data suggest there is little benefit to screening, and this should be addressed in a larger dataset.
Citation Format: Kristina A Fanucci, Mary Anne Fenton, Christine Duffy, Camille Higel-McGovern, Don Dizon. For women with bone-only metastatic breast cancer, is there a benefit to primary prevention? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-13.