bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Transoral robotic surgical resection followed by randomization to low- or standard-dose IMRT in resectable p16+ locally advanced oropharynx cancer: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E3311).
Authors: Ferris Robert L. , Flamand Yael , Weinstein Gregory S. , Li Shuli , Quon Harry , Mehra Ranee , Garcia Joaquin J. , Chung Christine H. , Gillison Maura L. , Duvvuri Umamaheswar , O'malley Bert W. , Ozer Enver , Thomas Giovana R. , Koch Wayne , Kupferman Michael Elliot , Bell Richard Bryan , Saba Nabil F. , Lango Miriam , Mendez Eduardo , Burtness Barbara 
Published: May 2020

6500 Background: ECOG-ACRIN 3311 examines reduced postoperative therapy in patients with “intermediate risk” p16+ oropharynx cancer (OPC) undergoing primary transoral surgical management. We report the primary endpoint of 2-year progression free survival (PFS) for patients randomized to 50Gy vs 60Gy without chemotherapy. Methods: Between December 2013 and July 2017, 82 credentialed surgeons performed transoral resection (TOS) for 519 OPC patients (cT1-2 stage III/IV AJCC7 without matted neck nodes); post-operative management was determined by pathologically assessed risk. Among 353 eligible and treated patients, Arm A enrolled 10% (N=37) for clear margins, 0-1 nodes, no extranodal extension (ENE)), Arms B (50Gy, N=102) or C (60Gy, N=104) randomized 58%, for clear/close margins, 2-4 + nodes, or ENE ≤1mm, while Arm D (N=110, 60-66Gy plus weekly cisplatin, 40 mg/m2, positive margin with any T stage, >4 + nodes, or >1mm ENE) enrolled 31%. Arm D assignment was based on >1mm ENE (76%), > 4 nodes (27%), and/or positive margins (11%). Intermediate-risk patients were stratified by smoking history (>10 pk-yr). Of the 80 pts (15%) deemed ineligible, 28 had scans/labs not done per protocol, however treatment arm distribution for all patients mirrored that for the 353 pts eligible and treated. Results: Median follow-up was 31.8 months. 2 yr PFS for Arms A, B and C were 93.9% (90% CI=87.3%, 100%), 95.0% (90% CI=91.4%, 98.6%) and 95.9% (90% CI=92.6%, 99.3%) respectively, while Arm D was 90.5% (90% CI=85.9%, 95.3%). The regimen of TOS + low-dose radiation is considered worthy of further study, since the primary endpoint of the upper bound of the 90% CI (in the intermediate risk group) exceeding 85% was met. Of 17 progression events, 7 were locoregional. There were 10 distant recurrences: Arm A=1, Arm B=2, Arm C=4, Arm D=3. Grade III/IV treatment-related AE rates were 15%/2% during surgery, 13%/2% for Arm B and 25%/0% for Arm C. There were 2 treatment-related deaths (one surgical and one Arm D). Conclusions: Transoral resection of p16+ OPC is safe and results in good oncologic outcome, presenting a promising deintensification approach. For patients with low-risk disease, 2-yr PFS is favorable without post-operative therapy. For those with uninvolved surgical margins, <5 involved nodes, and minimal (<1mm) ENE, reduced dose postoperative RT without chemotherapy appears sufficient. Transoral surgery plus 50Gy should be compared to optimal non-surgical therapy in a phase III trial. Clinical trial information: NCT01898494 .
Preliminary activity of tipifarnib in tumors of the head and neck, salivary gland and urothelial tract with HRAS mutations.
Authors: Ho Alan Loh , Hanna Glenn J. , Scholz Catherine Rose , Gualberto Antonio , Park Se Hoon 
Published: May 2020

6504 Background: HRAS is a proto-oncogene overexpressed and mutated in some human carcinomas. Tipifarnib is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of farnesyltransferase, a critical enzyme for proper HRAS function. Methods: We report data from two phase 2 clinical trials investigating the activity of tipifarnib in HRAS mutant (HRASm) solid tumors: KO-TIP-001 (NCT02383927: Squamous carcinomas [SCC], thyroid and salivary gland tumors, among others) and IST-01 (NCT02535650: Urothelial carcinomas, UC).Primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR, KO-TIP-001) and progression free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months (IST-01). All pts had RECIST v1.1. measurable disease at study entry. Pts receive a starting dose of tipifarnib of either 600 or 900 mg administered orally twice daily on days 1-7 and 15-21 of 28-day treatment cycles until progression of disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Proof of concept was achieved in studies KO-TIP-001 and IST-01. Based on preliminary efficacy results (Ho, et. al, ESMO 2018), KO-TIP-001 was amended to continue enrolling only in Head & Neck SCC (HNSCC) pts (Cohort 2) and other SCC pts (Cohort 3) with tumors carrying high HRASm variant allele frequency (VAF) >20%. As of 17 October 2019, 21 HNSCC pts meeting the high HRASm VAF criteria had been treated with tipifarnib of whom 18 were efficacy evaluable at data cut off. Pts had received a median of 2 prior systemic regimens. Ten objective responses were observed in 18 evaluable pts for an ORR of 56%. No responses were observed on last therapy prior to study entry. PFS on tipifarnib and on prior last therapy were, respectively, 6.1 and 2.8 months. In addition, 13 pts with recurrent/metastatic salivary gland tumors (SGT) were treated in KO-TIP-001 or in extended access programs. One objective response was observed in 12 (8%) evaluable pts and an additional 7 (58%) had stable disease as best response. Median PFS in SGT pts was 7 months. In IST-01, 224 UC pts were screened of whom 16 (7%) carried HRAS mutations and 15 of those were enrolled into the study. Five responses were observed in 12 evaluable UC pts (42%) and 3 additional pts had tumor size reduction. Median PFS was 5.1 months. Conclusions: Encouraging activity of tipifarnib was observed in HRASm solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02383927, NCT02535650 .
KEYNOTE-048: Progression after the next line of therapy following pembrolizumab (P) or P plus chemotherapy (P+C) vs EXTREME (E) as first-line (1L) therapy for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
Authors: Harrington Kevin Joseph , Rischin Danny , Greil Richard , Soulieres Denis , Tahara Makoto , Castro Gilberto , Psyrri Amanda , Baste Neus , Neupane Prakash C. , Bratland Åse , Fuereder Thorsten , Hughes Brett Gordon Maxwell , Mesia Ricard , Ngamphaiboon Nuttapong , Rordorf Tamara , Wan Ishak Wan Zamaniah , Zhang Yayan , Gumuscu Burak , Swaby Ramona F. , Burtness Barbara 
Published: May 2020

6505 Background: 1L P vs E improved OS in PD-L1 CPS ≥20 and CPS ≥1 populations, and led to noninferior OS in the total population, with favorable safety; 1L P+C vs E had superior OS in CPS ≥20, CPS ≥1, and total populations with comparable safety in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 study (NCT02358031) in patients with R/M HNSCC. Neither P vs E nor P+C vs E improved PFS in the PD-L1 CPS ≥20, CPS ≥1, or total populations. Here, we present the progression after the next line of therapy (PFS2) to assess the effect of 1L P or P+C and subsequent anticancer therapy on patient outcomes. Methods: Patients with locally incurable R/M HNSCC and no prior systemic therapy in the R/M setting were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to P, P+C, or E. PFS2 was defined as time from randomization to objective tumor progression on next-line therapy or death from any cause. PFS2 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as an exploratory outcome confined to those receiving subsequent therapy after 1L P. HR and 95% CIs were based on a Cox regression model with Efron’s method of tie handling with treatment as a covariate (stratified by ECOG performance status [PS], HPV status, and PD-L1 for CPS ≥1 and total populations; by ECOG PS and HPV status for CPS ≥20 population). Data cutoff: Feb 25, 2019. Results: Of 882 (301 [P]; 281 [P+C]; 300 [E]) treated patients,422 (P: 148 [49.2%]; P+C: 115 [40.9%]; E: 159 [53.0%]) received subsequent anticancer therapy after 1L P, most commonly C (P: 135 [44.9%]; P+C: 88 [31.3%]; E: 102 [34.0%]); EGFR inhibitor (P: 59 [19.6%]; P+C: 37 [13.2%]; E: 19 [6.3%]); and immune checkpoint inhibitor (P: 6 [2.0%]; P+C: 12 [4.3%]; E: 50 [16.7%]); patients may have received more than one type of subsequent therapy. Median PFS2 is reported in Table. Conclusions: In patients with R/M HNSCC, longer median PFS2 was observed in the CPS ≥20 and CPS ≥1 populations for P vs E, and in the CPS ≥20, CPS ≥1, and total populations for P+C vs E. These data further support use of 1L P or P+C in patients with R/M HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02358031 . [Table: see text]
Evaluation of the correlation between antibiotic use and survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Authors: Vellanki Paz J. , Marur Shanthi , Bandaru Pradeep , Mishra-Kalyani Pallavi Shruti , By Kunthel , Girvin Andrew , Chatterjee Somak , Singh Harpreet , Keegan Patricia , Larkins Erin A. , Cross Frank , Pazdur Richard , Theoret Marc R. 
Published: May 2020

6509 Background: Recent evidence suggests that treatment with systemic antibiotics (Abx) disrupts the intestinal microbiome and may be associated with decreased survival for patients receiving treatment with ICIs for advanced cancers, including R/M HNSCC. However, a potential confounder is that Abx use identifies a subgroup of patients with a worse prognosis. The FDA examined the association between Abx use and survival for ICIs and other drugs used for the treatment of patients with R/M HNSCC. Methods: Data submitted to the FDA from three randomized controlled trials with ICI as a single agent or with chemotherapy (ICI group) compared to chemotherapy and/or cetuximab (Control group) were pooled. The association between systemic Abx use within 30 days of initiating anticancer therapy and survival for the ICI and Control groups was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates and compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models, controlling for ECOG performance status, line of therapy, HPV status, PD-L1 expression, and other important prognostic factors. Results: In the ICI and Control groups, 36% and 46% of patients received Abx, respectively. For the ICI group, the difference in KM-estimated median overall survival (OS) was 5.6 months based on receipt of Abx (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70). Abx had no impact on OS for the Control group. Similar trends were observed for progression-free survival (PFS). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, systemic Abx within 30 days of initiating treatment for R/M HNSCC was associated with decreased survival for patients treated with ICIs compared with patients who did not receive Abx. Use of Abx had no apparent difference in survival in the control group. Further examination of the association between Abx use and clinical outcomes for patients with R/M HNSCC treated with ICIs is needed. [Table: see text]
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab combination therapy in patients with radioiodine-refractory (RAIR), progressive differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC): Results of a multicenter phase II international thyroid oncology group trial.
Authors: Haugen Bryan , French Jena , Worden Francis P. , Konda Bhavana , Sherman Eric Jeffrey , Dadu Ramona , Gianoukakis Andrew G. , Wolfe Eric G. , Foster Nathan R. , Bowles Daniel W. , Wirth Lori J. 
Published: May 2020

6512 Background: Lenvatinib is an approved therapy for patients with RAIR DTC. While the overall response rate (ORR) is high, few patients achieve a complete response (CR) and most patients eventually have progressive disease (PD). Combination lenvatinib and pembrolizumab is being explored in many different cancers, and this combination has been approved for advanced endometrial carcinoma. Methods: Patients with RAIR DTC with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST v1.1) measurable PD (<14 months (mo) prior to registration) were enrolled in this single-arm multicenter phase II study. Patients were excluded if they had received previous VEGFR-directed multikinase therapy. The lenvatinib starting dose was 20 mg/day orally and pembrolizumab was 200mg IV every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was CR. ORR, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 were secondary endpoints. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. The median age was 62.5 years, and 53% of the patients were women. Seventy percent of patients had grade 3 adverse events (AEs) and 10 percent had grade 4 AEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common > grade 3 AEs were hypertension (47%), weight loss (13%), maculopapular rash (13%), leukopenia (7%), diarrhea (7%) and oral mucositis (7%). Twenty-one patients (70%) required lenvatinib dose reduction. Of 29 evaluable patients, 18 (62%) had a partial response (PR) and 10 (35%) had stable disease (SD). The clinical benefit rate (ORR +SD) was 97%. Median time to tumor nadir was 7.4 mo (1.6-17.8 mo). Median PFS was not yet reached. The PFS at 12 months was 74%. Median time on therapy was 9.9 mo (3.2-18.9 mo). Fourteen patients are continuing therapy (7.6-18.9 mo). Six of these patients (43%) have not yet reached tumor size nadir. Three patients (10%) had > 80% target tumor shrinkage. Conclusions: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab is reasonably tolerated in patients with RAIR DTC. To date, there have been no documented complete responses. Combination lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab therapy has a high ORR in patients with RAIR DTC. Continuation of this study will help determine the depth and length of the responses. Clinical trial information: NCT02973997 .
Concurrent cetuximab (CTX) and nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): Results of phase II study.
Authors: Chung Christine H. , Bonomi Marcelo Raul , Steuer Conor Ernst , Schell Michael J. , Li Jiannong , Johnson Matthew , Masannat Jude , Hernandez-Prera Juan C. , McMullen Caitlin , Wadsworth J , Patel Krupal , Kish Julie Ann , Muzaffar Jameel , Kirtane Kedar , Rocco James William , Saba Nabil F. 
Published: May 2020

6515 Background: While anti-Programmed Death-1 (anti-PD-1) inhibitors have efficacy, only some patients (pts) with R/M HNSCC achieve clinically significant benefits. We designed the study to determine the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of concurrent CTX and NIVO in patients who had progressed on at least one prior treatment for their R/M HNSCC. Methods: Pts were treated with CTX 500 mg/m2 IV on Day (D) -14 as a lead-in followed by CTX 500 mg/m2 IV and NIVO 240 mg/m2 IV on D1 and D15 every 28-D cycle (C). Pts with CTX infusion reaction or who did not receive C1D1 for any reason were non-evaluable and replaced. NIVO dose reduction was not allowed but withheld/discontinued based on adverse event (AE) severity. Results: Total 47 pts are enrolled. 2 pts are non-evaluable. 45 evaluable pts are analyzed. Median age is 64 (24-77). ECOG performance status at baseline is 0 (9, 20%), 1 (33, 73%), and 2 (3, 7%). Primary sites are oral cavity 10 (22%), oropharynx 24 (53%), hypopharynx 3 (7%), larynx 6 (13%), and unknown primary 2 (4%). p16 status is available in 33 (73%). Prior treatments before the study enrollment are: chemotherapy (CT) 42 (93%), no CT 3 (7%), radiotherapy (RT) 38 (84%), no RT 7 (16%), checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) 23 (51%), and no CPI 22 (49%). PD-L1 combined positive scores (CPS) is available in 30 (67%). Median follow up time for overall survival (OS) is 12.6 months. The most common grade 3 treatment-related AE (TRAE) occurring ≥2 are fatigue 6 (13%) and rash-acneiform 2 (4.4%). The only grade 4 TRAE is CTX infusion reaction in 1 (2.2%). The most common grade 3 immune-related AE (IRAE) occurring ≥2 is fatigue 3 (6.7%). No grade 4 IRAE is observed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS are summarized in Table. Pts with no prior exposure to CPI have favorable PFS and OS relative to pts with prior CPI (PFS: HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.97, p=0.04 and OS: HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.22-1.14, p=0.09). Conclusions: Our data suggest the combination of CTX and NIVO is active in pts without prior CPI exposure and overall well tolerated in all pts. These preliminary results support further evaluation of the combination in CPI naïve pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03370276 . [Table: see text]
Phase II study of consolidative intensity-modulated radiation therapy following first-line palliative systemic chemotherapy for de novo previously untreated metastatic (M1) nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Authors: Lee Victor Ho-Fun , Chan Ann SY , Kwong Dora LW , Leung To-Wai , Ng Sherry CY , Tong Chi-Chung , Lam Ka-On , Vardhanabhuti Varut , Chan Sik-Kwan , Choi Cheuk-Wai , So Tsz Him , Chan Wing-Lok , Luk Mai-Yee , Khong Pek-Lan , Lee Anne WM 
Published: May 2020

6524 Background: The prognosis of de novo previously untreated metastatic (M1) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) at diagnosis is poor, and the role of consolidative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to the primary tumor and the neck following first-line palliative chemotherapy remains unknown. We report a phase II study of consolidative IMRT after first-line chemotherapy in previously untreated M1 NPC. Methods: Consolidative IMRT was given in prospectively recruited patients whose previously untreated M1 NPC did not progress after 6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. The primary study objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), regional relapse-free survival (RRFS), response and toxicity. Results: Sixty-nine consecutive patients were enrolled. Sixty-four (92.8%) patients received first-line chemotherapy, of which 8 (12.5%) developed progressive disease and another 8 (12.5%) did not receive IMRT despite non-progression to first-line chemotherapy. The remaining 48 patients whose disease controlled after chemotherapy received IMRT, including 18 (37.5%) who received concurrent chemoradiation. OS was significantly better in those who received IMRT (35.1 versus 14.2 months; P < 0.001), after a median follow-up duration of 3.40 years (range 0.43 years to 12.14 years). PFS, LRFS, and RRFS were also significantly longer in those who received IMRT. Multivariable analyses revealed that IMRT was the only prognostic factor of all survival endpoints. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 10 (20.8%) patients, mainly mucositis, dysphagia and desquamation. Conclusions: Consolidative IMRT was associated with an OS benefit and favorable tolerability among previously untreated M1 NPC patients who had non-progressive disease following first-line chemotherapy. These results support the rationale to further investigate IMRT as part of the initial treatment in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02476669 .
Pembrolizumab (P) or P + chemotherapy (C) versus EXTREME (E) as first-line (1L) therapy for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): analysis of KEYNOTE-048 by disease state.
Authors: Rischin Danny , Harrington Kevin Joseph , Greil Richard , Soulieres Denis , Tahara Makoto , Castro Gilberto , Psyrri Amanda , Baste Neus , Neupane Prakash C. , Bratland Åse , Fuereder Thorsten , Hughes Brett Gordon Maxwell , Mesia Ricard , Ngamphaiboon Nuttapong , Rordorf Tamara , Wan Ishak Wan Zamaniah , Lin Jianxin , Gumuscu Burak , Swaby Ramona F. , Burtness Barbara 
Published: May 2020

6530 Background: In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 trial ( NCT02358031 ) in R/M HNSCC (N = 882), 1L P vs E showed superior OS in PD-L1 CPS ≥20 and CPS ≥1 populations, noninferior OS in the total population, no PFS benefit, and favorable safety; 1L P+C vs E showed superior OS in CPS ≥20, CPS ≥1, and total populations, no PFS benefit, and comparable safety. Results of P or P+C vs E in incurable recurrent only, metastatic only, and R/M subgroups are shown. The metastatic only and R/M subgroups were combined and classified as metastatic. Methods: Patients with incurable recurrent (local and/or regional node recurrent disease) or metastatic HNSCC were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to P, P+C, or E. OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were based on a Cox regression model with Efron’s method of tie handling with treatment as a covariate stratified by ECOG performance status, HPV status, and PD-L1 status. Data cutoff: Feb 25, 2019. Results: In the incurable recurrent only subgroup (n = 252), median OS was 11.5 vs 12.1 mo (P vs E) and 13.0 vs 11.1 mo (P+C vs E). In the metastatic subgroup (n = 620), median OS was 11.4 vs 9.7 mo (P vs E) and 13.0 vs 10.1 mo (P+C vs E). Median follow-up, OS, and PFS are shown in Table. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) in the incurable recurrent only subgroup: 49.4% (P), 94.7% (P+C), and 97.8% (E); grade 3-5 TRAEs rates: 16.0%, 78.7%, and 73.3%, respectively. TRAE rates in the metastatic subgroup: 61.6% (P), 96.4% (P+C), and 96.4% (E); grade 3-5 TRAEs rates: 17.6%, 69.5%, and 67.0%, respectively. Conclusions: P and P+C vs E were efficacious in the metastatic subgroup; in the relatively smaller subgroup of patients with incurable recurrent only HNSCC, the effect was less pronounced. Consistent with the total study population and regardless of disease state, the safety profile was favorable with P vs E and comparable with P+C vs E. These data further support use of 1L P or P+C in patients with R/M HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02358031 . [Table: see text]
HANNA: Real-world outcomes from an observational study with nivolumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in Germany.
Authors: Dietz Andreas , Welslau Manfred , Hahn Dennis , Langer Christine , Bockmühl Ulrike , Müller-Huesmann Harald , Busch Chia-Jung , Riera-Knorrenschild Jorge , Büntzel Jens , Kubuschok Boris , von der Grün Jens , Gauler Thomas Christoph , Waldenberger Daniela , von der Heyde Eyck 
Published: May 2020

6532 Background: Nivolumab has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). As only limited real-world data are available, we describe the use of nivolumab and its outcomes in routine clinical practice. Methods: HANNA is a prospective, observational study of patients with R/M SCCHN treated with nivolumab in 56 hospitals and practices in Germany. In total, 385 patients will be followed for ≤ 5 years from treatment initiation until death, withdrawal of consent, loss of follow-up/record, or end of study. The primary objective is overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives include baseline characteristics, safety profiles, and quality of life (QOL) assessment. Results: By November 2019, data from 311 patients were available. Median follow-up was 3.5 months. Baseline characteristics were male, 81.7%; median age, 63 years; history of smoking, 73.3%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0/1, 60.8%; ECOG PS 2/3, 29.6%. Location of primary tumor was oropharynx, 38.3%; hypopharynx, 20.9%; oral cavity, 22.8%; larynx, 11.6%; others, 6.4%. 55.6% of R/M SCCHN patients progressed ≤ 6 months after platinum-based therapy, whereas 43.4% were platinum-sensitive (progressed > 6 months after platinum-based therapy). Nivolumab was received by 25.1% of patients as first therapy after platinum-based chemo- or radiochemotherapy, by 62.1% as second therapy, and by 12.9% as later line therapy. Median treatment duration was 4.6 months. OS at 1 year was 43.3%. 1-year OS for patients with ECOG PS 0 was 75.9%; ECOG PS 1, 41.2%; and ECOG PS 2, 27.3%. Platinum-sensitive patients had higher 1-year OS probability (51.6%). Drug-related adverse events (grade 1/2) and serious adverse events (grade 3/4) were observed in 28.9% and 10.0% of patients, respectively. Interim QOL data (per FACT-H&N and EQ-5D questionnaire) indicated a tendency toward stabilization or slight improvement. We will present an update of the data with longer follow-up (data cut March 2020). Conclusions: HANNA represents one of the largest real-world datasets for nivolumab in R/M SCCHN and comprises a more diverse set of patients than the phase 3 CheckMate 141 trial, including patients with higher ECOG PS, age, and platinum sensitivity. Outcomes from HANNA show that the improved OS, safety, and QOL seen with nivolumab in the real-world setting are consistent with the outcomes from CheckMate 141. Clinical trial information: NCT03114163 .