bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A phase I study of oral rucaparib in combination with carboplatin.
Authors: Molife L Rhoda , Roxburgh Patricia , Wilson Richard H. , Gupta Avinash , Middleton Mark R. , Evans T. R. Jeffry , Michie Caroline Ogilvie , Mateo Joaquin , Crawford Donna , Eatock Martin McKinlay , Saka Wasir , Cresti Nicola , Drew Yvette , Giordano Heidi , Despain Darrin , Simpson Dayna , Allen Andrew R. , Jaw-Tsai Sarah S. , Plummer Ruth 
Published: March 2020

2586 Background: Targeting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), an enzyme involved in DNA damage repair, may increase efficacy of DNA-damaging agents. This study evaluated the tolerability of oral rucaparib, a potent and selective PARP1/2 inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin (CP). Methods: Patients (pts) aged ≥18 with advanced solid tumors were included. Pts received lead-in doses of IV and oral rucaparib on Days -10 and -5, respectively, followed by CP on Day 1 and oral rucaparib on Days 1-14 q21 days. Treatment continued until disease progression. Pts with benefit could continue on rucaparib monotherapy once CP dosing was completed. Dose escalation was based on toxicities observed in Cycle 1 in cohorts of n=3-6. PK was assessed during Cycle 1. Results: 23 pts (median age 62 yrs [range 20 – 76]; 16 female; 9 ECOG PS=0; 6 ovarian/peritoneal cancer (OC), 5 breast cancer (BC), 2 NSCLC, 10 other tumor) were enrolled. Rucaparib doses of 80, 120, 180, 240, and 360 mg were administered with AUC3 CP, followed by 360 mg rucaparib with AUC4 CP, and currently with AUC5 CP. No DLTs have been reported. Median treatment cycles is 3 (range 1 – 15+). Treatment-related adverse events in ≥4 pts, all grades, include anemia (n=10), fatigue (n=9), nausea (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=6), constipation (n=5), lethargy (n=5), neutropenia (n=5), and anorexia (n=4). One pt (OC, BRCAwt, AUC3 CP/180 mg rucaparib) had a PR of 5.1 mo duration. Two patients (both with OC; 1 BRCAunk, 1BRCAwt) discontinued CP (after 4 & 8 cycles) and continued on rucaparib monotherapy (additional 5 and 7+ cycles, respectively). An additional 4 pts (all BRCAunk) had stable disease (SD) >12 wks. Overall disease control rate (CR+PR+SD>12 wks) in OC pts across all dose levels was 50% (3/6). Dose-proportional increase in rucaparib exposure was observed with steady state achieved by Day 14 and mean t1/2of 15 h. Oral bioavailability was 38% and dose-independent. Rucaparib exposure was not changed by CP co-administration. Conclusions: The combination of oral rucaparib and CP is well tolerated and exhibits activity at clinically relevant doses of each agent. Further studies in platinum-sensitive and homologous recombination repair deficient populations are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01009190.
A randomized, crossover phase I study to assess the effects of formulation and meal consumption on the bioavailability of dovitinib (TKI258).
Authors: Sharma Sunil , Ramanathan Ramesh K. , George Daniel J. , Quinlan Michelle , Kulkarni Swarupa , Homsi Alaeddin , Scott Jeffrey W. , Infante Jeffrey R. 
Published: March 2020

2593 Background: Dovitinib (TKI258), an oral multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is being studied in a phase 3 trial for renal cell carcinoma. A previous study compared the bioavailability of 2 capsule formulations of dovitinib. Arm 1 of the current study compared relative bioavailability of the final market image (FMI) form (monohydrate tablets) with the clinical service form (CSF; anhydrate capsules) of dovitinib. Arm 2 assessed the effect of food on bioavailability of the FMI tablet in adult patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Both arms employed crossover designs. Methods: In arm 1, pts were randomized to receive a single 500-mg dose of dovitinib either as a CSF capsule or FMI tablet, followed by a single 500-mg dose of the other formulation after 7 days of rest. Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles were determined from blood samples. A linear mixed-effects model fitted to log-transformed PK parameters maximal concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC0-tlast) was used to determine the relative bioavailability of FMI vs CSF. In Arm 2, pts received 300 mg of the FMI formulation once daily for 22 days after being randomized to 1 of 6 meal sequences with 3 fed or nonfed states (no meal [NM], low-fat [LF] meal, or high-fat [HF] meal) on days 8, 15, and 22. The relative bioavailability of dovitinib under LF and HF vs NM state was determined using the same model as arm 1 for the PK parameters Cmax and AUC0-tlast. Results: The study accrued 21 pts to arm 1 and 42 pts to arm 2. Based on the interim analysis, PK was assessed in 17 evaluable pts in arm 1. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs; 90% CI) for Cmax and AUC0-tlast comparing FMI vs CSF were 0.99 (0.91-1.08) and 0.96 (0.89-1.04), respectively. The FMI formulation was used in arm 2; PK was assessed in 19 pts. Cmax GMR (90% CI) was 0.82 (0.71-0.94) and 0.90 (0.78-1.03) for HF/NM and LF/NM, respectively. AUC0-tlastGMR (90% CI) was 0.91 (0.81-1.02) and 0.99 (0.88-1.10) for HF/NM and LF/NM, respectively. Conclusions: The oral bioavailability of the FMI tablet and CSF capsule were comparable, and there was no clinically relevant effect of food (HF or LF meals) on the bioavailability of the FMI tablet form of dovitinib. Clinical trial information: NCT01155713.
A pharmacogenetic model predicting low paclitaxel clearance based on the DMET platform.
Authors: Nieuweboer Annemieke J.M. , de Graan Anne-Joy M. , Elens Laure , Smid Marcel , Martens John W. M. , Sparreboom Alex , Friberg Lena E. , Elbouazzaoui Samira , Wiemer Erik A.C. , van der Holt Bronno , Verweij Jaap , van Schaik Ron H.N. , Mathijssen Ron H.J. 
Published: March 2020

2597 Background: Paclitaxel (PTX) is a commonly used cytotoxic agent. It is metabolized by P450 cytochrome iso-enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 and has high interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity. Here, we present a genetic prediction model to identify patients with low PTX clearance (CL) using the new Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme and Transporter (DMET; Affymetrix) platform, capable of detecting 1,936 genetic variants (SNPs) in 225 genes. Methods: In a PK study, 270 Caucasian cancer patients were treated with PTX. PK parameters were determined using a limited sampling strategy. HPLC or LC-MS/MS were used to determine PTX plasma concentrations and non-linear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM) was used to estimate individual unbound CL from previously developed PK population models. Subsequently, the cohort of patients was randomly split into a training and validation set. In all patients, the presence of SNPs in metabolic enzymes and transporters was determined using the DMET platform. Selected SNPs were subsequently validated in the validation set. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable in both sets. The mean CL of the total cohort was 488 ± 149 L/h and the threshold for low CL was set at 339 L/h (1 SD < total mean CL). 14 SNPs were selected to be included in the prediction model and validated in the validation set. For none of these 14 SNPs, evidence for a biological plausible link to taxane metabolism exists. The developed prediction model had a sensitivity of 95% to identify low PTX CL, a positive predictive value of 22% and remained significantly associated with low CL after multivariate analysis correcting for age, gender and Hb levels at start of therapy (P=0.024). Conclusions: This is the first considerably-sized application of the DMET platform to explain PK variability of a widely used anti-cancer drug. Although this validated prediction model for PTX CL had a high sensitivity, its positive predictive value is too low to be of direct clinical use. Likely, genetic variability in DMET genes alone does not sufficiently explain PTX CL, as for example environmental factors may also influence PTX metabolism.
Exposure and clearance of bevacizumab in patients with first-line advanced gastric cancer.
Authors: Sersch Martina A. , Han Kelong , Maia Mauricio , Jin Jin , Allison David 
Published: March 2020

2603 Background: Bevacizumab (BEV), rhuMAB VEGF, in combination with chemotherapy (CT) is currently approved in various types of cancer. Recently, BEV+CT was evaluated in 1st line advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in a double-blind randomized phase 3 trial (AVAGAST), but failed to meet the primary OS endpoint (HR=0.87; p=0.1002). BEV pharmacokinetics (PK) is well established by a reference population PK (PPK) model, and BEV PK is consistent across multiple cancer indications. However, BEV PK in AGC was never evaluated. We aimed to assess BEV exposure (EXP) and PK in AGC and to explore the influence of demographic, prognostic and biochemical (DPB) factors. Methods: BEV concentrations (Cp) were measured from plasma samples collected following disease progression from 182 patients (7.5mg/kg Q2W) in AVAGAST. Expected BEV Cp [median and 90% prediction interval (PI)] were simulated using the PPK model and compared to the observed BEV EXP. BEV clearance (CL) in AGC was estimated using NONMEM and compared between subgroups stratified by DPB factors. Results: All DPB factors of AGC are similar to those in other cancers except for lower body weight. No cachexia was observed. BEV Cp was detectable in 162 patients. 85% of observed BEV Cp was below the median BEV Cp simulated using PPK model and 38% below the lower limit of the 90% PI. Median BEV CL in AGC was 4.5 L/day/kg vs. 3 L/day/kg in other cancers. BEV CL was significantly higher (p=0.0012) in patients without prior gastrectomy (4.9 L/day/kg, n=120) than those with gastrectomy (4.1 L/day/kg, n=42). CL appeared to be higher in AGC patients with higher ECOG scores, lower albumin, more metastatic sites, poorer response and later stage AGC. Tumor location (GE Jct vs. Stomach), VEGF-A and ethnicity (Asian vs. Non-Asian) did not correlate with BEV CL. Conclusions: Overall, AGC patients exhibited significantly lower BEV EXP due to a 50% increase in BEV CL vs. other cancers. In addition, BEV is cleared significantly faster in patients without prior gastrectomy. The low BEV EXP in AGC could potentially reduce the effect of BEV in AGC. The underlying mechanism for faster BEV CL in AGC is unknown and warrants further research and potential BEV dose modifications.
Phase I clinical trial of lenalidomide with temsirolimus in patients with advanced cancer.
Authors: Ganesan Prasanth , Piha-Paul Sarina Anne , Naing Aung , Falchook Gerald Steven , Wheler Jennifer J. , Janku Filip , Zinner Ralph , Laday Shell , Kies Merrill S. , Tsimberidou Apostolia Maria 
Published: March 2020

2604 Background: Lenalidomide (immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic drug) and temsirolimus (mTOR inhibitor) are potentially synergistic (Raje N, Blood 2004;104(13):4188). We conducted a phase I study of the combination in patients with advanced cancers. Methods: During the escalation phase, lenalidomide (PO days 1-21) and temsirolimus (IV, Q weekly) were given at the following respective doses: level 1 (10 mg, 15mg); level 2 (10 mg, 20 mg); level 3 (20 mg, 20 mg); and level 4 (20 mg, 25 mg) (1 cycle = 28 days). A “3+3” study design was used. The maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and response were assessed. Results: Forty- three patients were treated (median age: 58 (21-80) years; male/female: 26:17). The most common diagnoses were colorectal cancer (N=5), sarcoma (N=5) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (N=4). Overall, 121 cycles (median: 2) were administered. No dose limiting toxicities were observed. The maximum tested dose (level 4) was used for expansion. Grade 3-4 toxicity (all reversible) occurred in 19 (44%) patients: neutropenia (N=12), thrombocytopenia (N=6), and infection (N=1). Of 43 patients, 31 (72%) received anticoagulation prophylaxis. There were no thrombotic events. Of 36 patients who were evaluable for response, PR was noted in 1 (2.7%), and stable disease (SD) was noted in 17 (47%) patients (SD ≥6 months: 17%). Tumors with SD≥6 months were soft tissue sarcoma, 2/5 (40%), adenoid cystic carcinoma, 1/4 (25%), parotid ca, 1/2 (50%), adrenocortical ca 1/3 (33%), and neuroendocrine ca, 1/4 (25%) (Table). The median progression-free survival was 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.5-2.9) and overall survival was 7.8 months (95% CI, 5.1-10.6). Conclusions: Lenalidomide and temsirolimus combination was well tolerated and had antitumor activity in selected participants with advanced cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01183663. [Table: see text]
Results of two phase I dose escalation studies of the oral heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor SNX-5422.
Authors: Bauer Todd Michael , Infante Jeffrey R. , Ramanathan Ramesh K. , Weiss Glen , Sachdev Jasgit C. , Burris Howard A. , Hinson James M , Orlemans Everardus O 
Published: March 2020

2617 Background: SNX-5422 is a prodrug of SNX-2112, a highly potent, non-geldanamycin analog, HSP90 inhibitor with preclinical anti-tumor activity in multiple tumor models. These phase 1 studies were designed to evaluate safety and tolerability, determine dose limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), and describe pharmacokinetics of SNX-2112 and SNX-5422. Methods: Two phase 1, open-label, 3 + 3 dose-escalation studies evaluated SNX-5422 when given daily (QD) or every-other-day (QOD) during the first 30 days of treatment in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Plasma concentrations of SNX-2112 and SNX-5422 were measured after the first and 11th (steady state) doses. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks. Results: In both studies, pts received SNX-5422 QOD, 3 wks on/1 wk off, with doses ranging from 4 to 133 mg/m2 QOD. In one study, pts also received QD doses from 50 to 89 mg/m2, 3 wks on/1 wk off, and 50 mg/m2 QD continuously. Fifty-six pts (34M/22F; mean age 62 years) were enrolled. Treatment-related adverse events were mainly low grade (G), including diarrhea (64%), nausea (39%), vomiting (29%), fatigue (27%), abdominal pain (14%), and anorexia (14%). Reversible G 1 blurry vision, and G 1-2 blurry vision/vision darkening were reported by 1 pt on 100 mg/m2 QOD, and 4 pts treated with 50 to 89 mg/m2 QD. G 3 diarrhea was dose limiting in 2 of 3 pts (89 mg/m2 QD; 133 mg/m2 QOD). MTDs for the QOD and QD schedules were declared at100 mg/m2 and 67 mg/m2, respectively. The QD schedule was associated with higher incidences of treatment related adverse events. 38 pts were evaluable for response including 1 confirmed durable complete response, 1 unconfirmed partial response, and 17 with stable disease. Activity was seen in adrenal, lung, liver, neuroendocrine, GIST, and prostate. All but 2 were seen with the QOD schedule. Conclusions: SNX-5422 mono-therapy was generally well tolerated and showed promising signs of efficacy in pts with advanced solid tumors. Given the superior benefit-risk profile of QOD dosing over QD dosing based on these preliminary clinical findings, 100 mg/m2 QOD has been selected for further clinical testing. Clinical trial information: NCT00506805 and NCT01611623.
Effective incorporation of biospecimen collection for translational studies into a phase III trial: The NeoALTTO experience (BIG 01-06).
Authors: Nuciforo Paolo , Jimenez Jose , Aura Claudia , Fumagalli Debora , Maetens Marion , Prudkin Ludmila , Rothe Francoise , Vazquez Josep , Loi Sherene , Eidtmann Holger , Sotiriou Christos , Baselga Jose 
Published: March 2020

3012 Background: Translational research studies in the context of clinical trials using targeted therapies are essential for the identification of biomarkers of response or resistance. However, many challenges (e.g. logistic, technical) can impede proper biological sample collection. The NEOALTTO study provided an excellent opportunity to address these issues. Methods: In this large neoadjuvant phase III multicenter, multinational clinical trial, serial samples (plasma, serum, frozen and FFPE specimens) from patients with breast cancer were collected in 86 sites (23 countries) at several time points (baseline, week 2 and surgery). Standardized operating procedures were made available to sites together with pre-assembled kits for sample collection, processing, storage, and shipment to reduce the variability and increase compliance with the study protocol. All biospecimens were centralized for long term storage. Baseline fresh/frozen samples were processed for downstream analyses according to a pre-defined workflow. Evaluable sample population (ESP) was determined based on the following criteria: tumor cellularity, RNA integrity (RIN), and yield. Results: A total of 12,193 serial samples from 449 of 455 randomized patients was collected. The overall sample missing rate was 9.5% (includes samples not collected by site, withdrawn patients and pCR). Missing rates were 9%, 8%, 13%, and 9% for plasma, serum, frozen and FFPE specimens, respectively. At least 1 frozen tumor tissue was available for 423 (94%), 431 (96%), and 334 (74%) patients at baseline, week 2, and surgery, respectively. After 2 extraction cycles, 629 and 516 baseline frozen samples were processed for RNA and DNA extraction, respectively. The ESP was 71% (58% when RIN considered) and 80% for downstream RNA- and DNA-based analyses, respectively. Incorrect material, inappropriate sample processing and low or absent tumor cellularity were some of the factors affecting the ESP. Conclusions: These results show that careful upfront logistic and technical planning in NEOALTTO had a significant impact on the compliance and the quality of collected material, which may ultimately result in valuable research data. Clinical trial information: NCT00553358.
Immune gene expression in primary melanomas to predict lower risk of recurrence and death.
Authors: Sivendran Shanthi , Chang Rui R. , Harcharik Sara , Hall Lawrence , Bernardo Sebastian , Moskalenko Marina , Phelps Robert , Sivendran Meera , Cohain Ariella , DiFeo Analisa , Parides Michael , Lebwohl Mark , Friedlander Philip , Banchereau Jacques , Bhardwaj Nina , Oh William K. , Burakoff Steven J. , Palucka Karolina , Merad Miriam , Saenger Yvonne M. 
Published: March 2020

3014 Background: Improved biomarkers are needed to define recurrence risk in patients with completely resected skin melanomas. Standard prognostic indicators used in staging, including depth, ulceration, and mitotic rate, while useful, often fail to accurately predict recurrence for individual patients. The immune system may prevent recurrence in this population, but no evidence-based immune biomarkers are in clinical use. Biomarker development has been hindered by clinical standards necessitating that the entire specimen be formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) for morphology evaluation, a process damaging to RNA. Methods: To define a biomarker for melanoma recurrence, mRNA copy number of immune-related genes from FFPE melanoma was measured using NanoString, a hybridization assay suited for analysis of partially degraded RNA. Genes predictive of non-recurrence were defined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in a training cohort and then validated in an independent patient cohort. Results: A panel of 21 genes predictive of non-recurrence were defined using ROC curves in a training cohort (N=44). This result was validated in an independent patient cohort (N=37, AUC=0.794). Protein levels of the most differentially expressed gene, CD2, also associated with non-recurrence (p<0.001). The immune gene panel and CD2 staining associated with prolonged survival (p<0.001 and p=0.019, respectively). Conclusions: mRNA copy number of immune-related genes in primary FFPE melanomas predicts non-recurrence and prolonged survival. This data highlights the impact of immunosurveillance in primary human melanoma and the identified gene panel may be a useful tool for patient stratification for adjuvant immunotherapy studies.
Effect of oral cyclophosphamide on the immunogenicity of DPX-Survivac in ovarian cancer patients: Results of a phase I study.
Authors: Berinstein Neil Lorne , Oza Amit M. , Odunsi Kunle , Karkada Mohan , Villella Jeannine A , Nemunaitis John J. , Morse Michael , Pejovic Tanja , Bentley James , Nigam Rita , Weir Genevieve , MacDonald Lisa , Stanford Marianne , Burzykowski Tomasz , Mansour Marc 
Published: March 2020

3030 Background: Survivin, a protein involved in regulation of apoptosis, is highly expressed in many tumor types and has reported prognostic value. DPX-Survivac is a cocktail of survivin HLA class I peptides (A1, A2, A3, A24 and B7) formulated in the novel adjuvanting vaccine platform DepoVax. A phase I study examined the safety and immune potency of DPX-Survivac in combination with cyclophosphamide in ovarian cancer patients. Methods: 18 of 19 advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with platinum chemotherapy and showing no disease progression completed their vaccine therapy. Cohort A (6 pts) received three 0.5 mL vaccine injections 3 weeks apart; cohorts B and C (6 pts each) received three 0.1 mL or 0.5 mL vaccine injections in combination with metronomic low dose oral cyclophosphamide. Adverse events were assessed using CTCAE v4.0. Blood was collected to study immune function (MDSCs, T regs and B cells) and vaccine-induced T cell immunity (ELISpot, tetramer analysis and multi-parametric intracellular cytokine staining). Repeated measures of immunity at baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 injections were analyzed using a general linear model. Results: DPX-Survivac was well tolerated with no significant systemic AEs. Local injection AEs occured in all patients. Grade 3 local reactions occured in 3 patients (1 pt in B and 2 pts in C). 11 of 12 patients receiving the combination therapy produced immune responses by at least 2 assays, generally established with one or two vaccinations and increased or maintained with boosters. A dose response was observed, with cohort C patients producing significantly higher magnitude responses (C vs B, P=.013). Low dose cyclophosphamide significantly enhanced the 0.5 ml dose (C vs A, P=.015). Notably, antigen specific CD8 T cells were detected ex vivoi n PBL’s using tetramers and further characterized as polyfunctional by multi-parametric ICS, suggesting a robust immune response. Conclusions: DPX-Survivac is well tolerated and immunogenic. Immune modulation with low dose oral cyclophosphamide can dramatically enhance the immunogenicity of this vaccine. The efficacy of the proposed DPX-Survivac vaccine therapy needs to be tested in a randomized phase II study. Clinical trial information: NCT01416038.