bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Hepatitis C Virus Transmission at a Long-Term Care Facility (LTCF) Providing Hemodialysis Services—Georgia, United States, 2019
Authors: Wagner JoAnna , Gandhi Ami , Johnson Bill , Gualandi Nicole , Bixler Danae , Hayden Tonya , Ho Po-Yi , Ramachandran Sumathi , Patel Priti , Negley Jeanne 
Published: November 2020

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission at outpatient hemodialysis clinics is well documented, but little is known about HCV transmission risks in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) providing hemodialysis services. LTCFs can provide onsite hemodialysis for residents by contracting with a licensed hemodialysis clinic to either provide its staff to the LTCF or to train LTCF staff as caregivers. In August 2019, the Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH) was notified about an HCV seroconversion in patient A at a LTCF providing onsite hemodialysis. Methods: Three residents (including patient A) were receiving hemodialysis at the LTCF in August 2019; patients B and C had chronic HCV infection upon admission. Records were reviewed for medical history, behavioral risk factors, and healthcare exposures. We conducted onsite infection control assessments and interviewed staff. Serum specimens were collected for all 3 patients in August 2019 and HCV tested for genetic similarity using Global Hepatitis Outbreak Surveillance Technology (GHOST). Results: The facility reported initiating onsite hemodialysis in November 2018; facility staff were trained by a dialysis provider. Patient A, admitted in September 2018, was anti-HCV negative in June 2019 and both anti-HCV and HCV RNA positive in July 2019. Patient B was admitted in December 2018, discharged for 1 month in May 2019, and then readmitted. Patients A and B reported previous injection drug use, and they were not observed by staff to use during their stay and had limited mobility. Patient A was wheelchair confined and B was bed confined. Patient C was admitted in May 2019. HCV samples from patients A and B both had HCV genotype 1b and demonstrated 100% genetic relatedness, indicating that patient B was the likely source. Patient C had HCV genotype 1a. Hemodialysis was provided to residents simultaneously in a converted resident room with 4 hemodialysis stations, and the LTCF operated 2 shifts, 3 times per week. We observed multiple infection control gaps, such as preparation of IV medications and inadequate disinfection in the shared dialysis treatment area. Recommendations addressing gaps were issued, and a follow-up site visit was conducted to validate implementation. With the exception of May 2019, patients A and B received hemodialysis on the same shift and days from December 2018 to September 2019. Conclusions: Phylogenetic and epidemiological results indicate HCV transmission likely occurred during hemodialysis services provided by the LTCF. As the provision of dialysis expands to nontraditional settings such as LTCFs, it is essential that proper infection control procedures and oversight are in place.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Hospital Infections by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Results in Five Years of Multicentric Study
Authors: Tanure Luciana , Pinho Rafaela , Oliveira Mayra de , Ribeiro Daniela , Ferreira Jose A. , Couto Braulio , Starling Carlos 
Published: November 2020

Background:Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging pathogen responsible for high morbidity and mortality rates. Hospital infections caused by this bacteria, especially in intensive care centers, are concerning for the health system, given that the microorganism is multidrug resistant to most antimicrobials available. Objective: Therefore, the present study is built from an analysis of the variables related to nosocomial infections caused by S. maltophilia in hospitals in Brazil, to display points of major concern. Methods: We used the data collected by the Infection Prevention and Control Service to clarify the incidence rate of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Brazilian hospitals as well as the gross lethality of these infections and the profiles of infected patients. We collected and analyzed epidemiological data from 10 hospitals in Brazil for the period July 2014 to June 2019 according to the CDC NHSN protocol. Results: In 5 years, 93 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections were diagnosed in the hospitals analyzed. Overall, 61 occurred in men (66%) and 32 occurred in women (34%). Furthermore, 47 cases (51%) occurred in adult ICUs; 19 cases (20%) followed zascular surgery; 9 (10%) cases occurred in the neonatal ICU; 7 (8%) cases were from the medical clinic; and 11 (12%) were from other clinics. The incidence rate was 1.2 cases for 10,000 hospitalizations, ranging from 0.0 to 2.8 (Fig. 1). Patients’ ages ranged from 0 to 90 years, with a mean of 55 years (SD, 26 years) and a median of 64 years. Time between admission and diagnosis of infection was 1 to 102 days, with a mean of 24 days (SD, 21 days) and a median of 17 days. The gross lethality for S. maltophilia infection was 43 of 93 (46%) (95% CI, 35.8%–56.9%). The frequencies of specific infections were as follows (Fig. 2): pneumonia, 26 (28%); tracheobronchitism, 22 (24%); primary bloodstream infection, 18 (19%); skin and soft-tissue infection, 13 (14%); local infection, 7 (8%); vascular access infection, 3 (3%); urinary tract infection, 2 (2%); gastrointestinal infection, 1 (1%); and eye, nose, throat, and mouth infections, 1 (1%). Conclusions:Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection is a rare and highly lethal event that usually occurs after 2 weeks of hospitalization. The most affected region is the respiratory tract, with a higher incidence in patients aged >60 years or in the ICU. Early and accurate investigations of multiresistant microorganisms in a hospital setting are needed to reduce patient morbidity and mortality.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Impact of Expansion of Vascular Access Team on Central-line–Associated Bloodstream Infections
Authors: Holder Carolyn , Overton Elizabeth , Kalaf Sarah , Wong Doris , Holdsworh Jill , Yun Mylinh , Schreck Debra , Haun Philip , Omess Sarah , Whitson Margaret , Ott Deborah , Mitchell Rae , Steinberg James 
Published: November 2020

Background: Through participation in a system-wide healthcare-associated infection-reduction task force, we leveraged our ability to standardize best practices across hospitals in a university-owned healthcare system to reduce central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates. Methods: Our multidisciplinary team had representation from all hospitals in our healthcare system. The team benchmarked practices in place and compared CLABSI standardized infection ratios (SIRs). One hospital had a robust vascular access team (VAT) and consistently low CLABSI SIRs; expanding and standardizing VAT across the hospitals in the system became the primary goal of the team. We developed a business case to justify VAT expansion that considered savings from decreasing CLABSIs and benefits to interventional radiology revenue by decreasing PICC insertion and comparing costs for added full-time equivalents (FTEs). CLABSI rates before and after VAT team expansion at 2 large hospitals were compared to the hospital with existing robust VAT. Other process improvement activities were implemented across all hospitals. The expanded VAT assumed responsibility for central-line maintenance, promoted removal of unneeded lines, expanded education efforts, and enhanced capacity for insertions. Results: The VAT expansion from 5.4 FTEs to 15.9 FTEs at 2 large hospitals (1,100 total beds) began in April 2017 and was phased over ~6 months. CLABSI SIRs for the 15 months preceding expansion were compared to the SIRs for the 15-month period after expansion for the 2 hospitals with expanded VAT (hospitals A and B) and for hospital C with preexisting robust VAT (Table 1). We observed a 33% decrease in PICC insertions in interventional radiology department in hospitals A and B. Overall return on investment (ROI) estimates using lower and upper cost per CLABSI ranged from a loss of $156,000 to a net gain of $623,000. Conclusions: A significant decrease in CLABSI rates temporally related to expansion of VAT occurred in 2 hospitals, whereas the hospital with existing robust VAT demonstrated a modest decrease in CLABSI rates. We were able to demonstrate a favorable ROI from the VAT expansion without an impact on HAC penalties. Using the model of standardizing best practices across a system and creative ROIs may help justify the addition of scarce resources.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Implementing Admission Screening for Candida auris
Authors: Rasmusson Jenna , Wengenack Nancy , Sampathkumar Priya 
Published: November 2020

Background:Candida auris is a globally emerging, multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen that causes serious, difficult-to-treat infections in hospitalized patients. C. auris cases in the United States have been linked to receipt of healthcare overseas. Outbreaks have also occurred in New York City, New Jersey, Chicago, and most recently in California. We provide care to patients from all 50 states and 138 countries; therefore, we are at risk for encountering C. auris in our facility. Setting: An academic, tertiary-care center with 1,297 licensed beds and >62,000 admissions each year. Methods: Infection prevention and control (IPAC) initiated a C. auris screening program in August 2019 in partnership with the State Health Department. A case-finding tool was created to identify adult patients admitted in the previous 24 hours from countries and areas of the United States (Chicago, New Jersey, and New York metropolitan areas) with known C. auris transmission based on the zip code of their primary address. IPAC sends an electronic communication via the electronic medical record (EMR) alerting the patient care team that the patient meets criteria for screening along with information on C. auris and links to a tool kit with additional resources to help answer questions. After obtaining verbal consent, the patient’s primary nurse collects a composite axilla–groin skin swab using a nylon-flocked swab (BD ESwab collection and transport system; Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD). The sample is sent to the State Health Department laboratory for testing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results are communicated back to IPAC and then scanned into the patient’s EMR. Results: From August 2019 to November 2019, 157 patients were identified for C. auris screening using the case-finding tool. Testing was performed on 95 patients; all tests were negative. The primary reasons for testing not to be performed on eligible patients were inability to obtain verbal consent and patient dismissal before sample could be obtained. The need for a special swab that is not routinely stocked on patient care units has been a limitation to timely specimen collection. Conclusions: The EMR can be leveraged for early identification and screening of patients at risk of C. auris colonization. Case finding tools can be effectively replicated and modified to respond to emerging infections and changing surveillance guidelines.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Incidence of Mucosal Barrier Injury Bloodstream Infections Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network
Authors: Patel Prachi , Dudeck Margaret A. , Magill Shelley , Chea Nora , Thompson Nicola , Godfrey-Johnson Dominque 
Published: November 2020

Background: The NHSN collects data on mucosal barrier injury, laboratory-confirmed, bloodstream infections (MBI-LCBIs) as part of bloodstream infection (BSI) surveillance. Specialty care areas (SCAs), which include oncology patient care locations, tend to report the most MBI-LCBI events compared to other location types. During the update of the NSHN aggregate data and risk models in 2015, MBI-LCBI events were excluded from central-line–associated BSI (CLABSI) model calculations; separate models were generated for MBI-LCBIs, resulting in MBI-specific standardized infection ratios (SIRs). This is the first analysis to describe risk-adjusted incidence of MBI-LCBIs at the national level. Methods: Data were analyzed for MBI-LCBIs attributed to oncology locations conducting BSI surveillance from January 2015 through December 2018. We generated annual national MBI-LCBI SIRs using risk models developed from 2015 data and compared the annual SIRs to the baseline (2015) using a mid-P exact test. To account for the impact of an expansion in the MBI-LCBI organism list in 2017 from 489 organisms (32 genera) to 1,003 organisms (89 genera), we removed the MBI-LCBI events that met the newly added MBI organisms and generated additional MBI SIRs for 2017 and 2018. Results: The annual SIRs remained above 1 since 2015, indicating a greater number of MBI-LCBIs identified than were predicted based on the 2015 national data (Fig. 1). Each year’s SIR was significantly different than the national baseline, and the highest SIR was observed in 2017 (SIR, 1.377). In 2017, 12% of MBI events were attributed to an organism that was added to the MBI organism list, and in 2018 it was 10%. After removal of MBIs attributed to the expanded organisms, the 2017 and 2018 SIRs remained higher than those of previous years (1.241 and 1.232, respectively). Conclusions: The distinction of MBI-LCBIs from all other CLABSIs provides an opportunity to assess the burden of this infection type within specific patient populations. Since 2015, the increase of these events in the oncology population highlights the need for greater attention on prevention strategies pertinent to MBI-LCBI in this vulnerable population.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Investigation of the First Case of New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-1–Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Texas
Authors: Sopirala Madhuri , Badejogbin Aderonke , Christie-Smith Angela , Psenicka Andrew , Reid Sherry , Hartless Kathleen , Fiveash Jeanette 
Published: November 2020

Background: New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases impart resistance to carbapenems. Enterobacteriaceae carrying New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases have been reported before. However, only 7 cases of blaNDM-carrying Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been reported from 4 states in the United States as of January 1, 2018, according to the CDC. We describe an epidemiologic investigation of the first reported case of blaNDM-carrying Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Texas and the measures that controlled the spread of the organisms carrying this gene at a 30-bed spinal cord injury unit (SCI) and the acute-care hospital within the Veterans’ Affairs North Texas Health Care System. Methods: After identification of blaNDM-1–carrying P. aeruginosa from a urine culture in an SCI patient who received medical treatment in Thailand prior to transfer, we performed a rectal screen for the presence of blaNDM in the index patient’s hospital roommates. Based on the results, we expanded the investigation to other patient care units that had provided care to the patient. We initiated universal contact isolation precautions, 1:1 nursing care, restricted movement, phased point-prevalence testing, and intense environmental cleaning until the threat of blaNDM was mitigated. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on clinical isolates from the index patient and the roommates by the CDC. Results: Of the 2 roommates of the index, 1 patient had a urine culture positive for blaNDM-5-carrying Escherichia coli. The second roommate has subsequently grown blaNDM-1-carrying P. aeruginosa from a clinical culture. A third patient who was in the same unit as the index patient but not in the same room in an acute-care unit tested positive for blaNDM in a rectal screen. Of the 54 patients who were hospitalized in the same unit as the index patient, 26 refused to get the test and 28 tested negative. In addition, point-prevalence rectal screening was conducted in the SCI in 3 phases that were 3 to 4 weeks apart. All of these screening tests were negative. WGS revealed that the index patient and roommate 2 had blaNDM-1–carrying P. aeruginosa, whereas the roommate 1 had blaNDM-5–carrying E. coli. No further spread occurred. Conclusions: Our aggressive efforts quickly mitigated further spread of blaNDM. Our epidemiologic investigation indicates that an intergenus transfer of blaNDM from P. aeruginosa to E. coli likely took place. In addition, it appears there was an evolution of NDM-1 to NDM-5, which differs from the former by 2 amino acid substitutions at positions 88 (Val→Leu) and 154 (Met→Leu). This type of evolution has been shown by prior studies to confer increased antibiotic resistance in certain resource limited settings.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Liberal and Restrictive Blood Transfusion Strategies in Orthopedic Surgery: Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection
Authors: Pereira Hoberdan , Perucci Marcelo , de Lima Lucas , Bodour Daniel , Vieira Laura , Teixeira Rafael , Couto Braulio , Andrade Antônio 
Published: November 2020

Background: The identification of risk factors for infections in surgical patients with lower-limb fractures and blood transfusions has increased in recent years. Surgical site infections (SSIs) increase hospitalization, care costs, and patient suffering. Correction surgery for lower-limb fractures and blood transfusion is quite common between surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between blood transfusion and SSI in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery on lower limbs. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study to identify risk factors for SSI in blood transfused patients undergoing fracture repair in lower-limb surgeries between February 2017 and May 2019 in 2 reference tertiary-care hospitals in Belo Horizonte, a city of 3 million people in Brazil. Data regarding patient characteristics, surgical procedures, blood transfusions, and surgical infections were collected. Patient characterization was performed by calculating the absolute and relative frequencies of categorical variables and calculating mean, median, minimum, maximum, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation for quantitative variables. The incidence of surgical site infection, the risk of postoperative hospital death, and the total length of hospital stay were calculated by point estimates and 95% confidence intervals identified by statistical tests of bilateral hypotheses, considering the level of significance of 5%. A multivariate analysis (logistic regression) was performed to identify SSI risk factors. Results: Patients who had an indication for blood transfusion (n = 38) but who did not receive blood (n = 4) had significantly lower hemoglobin, comparing discharge with admission, than the group who received blood. Intraoperative transfusion was a risk factor for SSI (OR, 4.7) (Fig. 1). Among the 205 patients with no indication for transfusion, 98 received blood even without the indication: there was no difference in hemoglobin outcome when discharge and admission were compared, and the 98 patients were exposed to unnecessary risk. Regarding restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies, there were differences in the variables, age (P = .000), duration of surgery (P = .003), number of comorbidities (P = .000), body mass index (BMI) (P = .027), previous hemoglobin (P = .000), and high hemoglobin (P = .000), considering the transfusion practice employed (Fig. 2). Conclusions: The indications for and definition of protocols and careful evaluation of blood transfusion are critical to avoid infectious complications in orthopedic patients with lower-limb fractures.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Moving Beyond Contact Precautions: Implementation of a Staphylococcus aureus Screening and Decolonization Program
Authors: Hochman Sarah , Stachel Anna , Phillips Michael , Sterling Stephanie , Lighter Jennifer , Aguero-Rosenfeld Maria , King-Morrieson Tamara 
Published: November 2020

Background:Staphylococcus aureus–colonized hospitalized patients are at risk for invasive infection and can transmit S. aureus to other patients in the absence of symptoms. Infection isolation precautions do not reduce the risk of infection in colonized patients and are untenable in health systems with high rates of S. aureus colonization. Objective: We implemented an inpatient S. aureus screening and targeted decolonization program across hospital campuses to reduce transmission and invasive infection. We screen and decolonize for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) because MSSA makes up more than half of all S. aureus isolated from clinical cultures in our health system. Methods: All medicine, pediatrics, and transplant patients receive S. aureus nares culture at admission and upon change in level of care for medicine, and at admission and weekly for pediatrics and transplant patients. All S. aureus–colonized patients receive decolonization with nasal mupirocin ointment and chlorhexidine baths. Two implementation frameworks guide our processes for S. aureus screening and decolonization: the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, to evaluate factors affecting implementation at different levels of the health system, and the Dynamic Sustainability Framework, to account for iterative changes as the hospital setting and patient population change over time. Implementation interventions focus on education of patients and bedside nurses who perform S. aureus screening and decolonization; utilization of the electronic health record to identify patients for screening and/or decolonization and avoid human error; and introduction of a clinical nurse specialist to oversee the program and to provide iterative feedback. Results: At baseline, 21% of patients had S. aureus colonization, 20% of which was MRSA, and the MRSA bloodstream infection rate was 0.06 per 1,000 patient days. After program implementation, there was no change in S. aureus colonization and the MRSA bloodstream infection rate fell to 0.04 per 1,000 patient days. Screening compliance improved from 39% (N = 1,805) of eligible patients in the 6-month period before the introduction of the clinical nurse specialist to 52% (N = 2,024) after the introduction of the clinical nurse specialist. In the same periods, decolonization increased from 18.6% to 41% of eligible patients. Conclusions: We used 2 implementation frameworks to design our S. aureus screening and decolonization program and to make iterative changes to the program as it evolved to include new patient populations and different hospital settings. This resulted in a large-scale, sustainable, health system program for S. aureus control that avoids reliance on infection isolation precautions.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None