bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Cluster of Infections Associated With Contaminated Stem-Cell Products
Authors: OYong Kelsey 
Published: November 2020

Background: The unapproved and unregulated use of umbilical stem-cell products has been identified as a possible source of adverse events and infection. In 2018, a national outbreak of multiple bacterial infections was associated with use of umbilical stem cells products. From December 2018 through March 2019, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (LACDPH) identified 4 cases of bacterial infection in patients that had received therapies using umbilical stem-cell products. Although 2 cases were associated with the national outbreak of a single company’s product, 2 additional cases of Enterobacter cloacae were instead associated with a second stem-cell distributer. Methods: In December 2018, LACDPH staff received notification from a hospital infectious disease physician of 2 cases of E. cloacae infection in patients of a freestanding ambulatory surgery center following allogenic umbilical cord stem-cell injections on the same day in August 2018. LACDPH reviewed the medical records of these patients and conducted an on-site visit to the ambulatory surgery center, which included observation of infection prevention practices, interview of staff, and review of logs. The 2 isolates from each patient were sent to the CDC laboratory for relatedness testing. Results: The 2 case patients received products via intra-articular injection from different lot and donor numbers for lumbar spine pain. In addition to the stem-cell product, both patients also received antibiotics and pain medications during their procedures, though from different vials. Both patients were seen by the same surgeon, anesthesiologist, and nurse during their procedures. No additional cases occurred. The case patients were hospitalized for 12 and 27 days, respectively. Whole-genome sequencing indicated that the isolates from the 2 patients were related. No major gaps in infection prevention practices were identified at the surgery center. Conclusion: This report describes a cluster of 2 E. cloacae infections in patients who had received unapproved-use stem-cell products via spinal injection. Given molecular laboratory results and infection prevention observations, we hypothesize that the stem-cell products used on these 2 cases were likely contaminated before distribution. This cluster demonstrates that contamination of stem-cell products extends beyond the single outbreak previously described and points to the systematic inability to ensure the safety of unapproved use of umbilical stem- cell products.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Colonization and Infection With MRSA and CRKP and Its Result in an Increased Mortality Rate Within the Intensive Care and High-Dependency Units in Barbados
Authors: Gustave Keisha 
Published: November 2020

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) are a growing public health concern in Barbados. Intensive care and critically ill patients are at a higher risk for MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection. MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection are associated with a high mortality and morbidly rate in the intensive care units (ICUs) and high-dependency units (HDUs). There is no concrete evidence in the literature regarding MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection in Barbados or the Caribbean. Objectives: We investigated the prevalence of MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection in the patients of the ICU and HDU units at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital from 2013 to 2017. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients admitted to the MICU, SICU, and HDU from January 2013 through December 2017. Data were collected as part of the surveillance program instituted by the IPC department. Admissions and weekly swabs for rectal, nasal, groin, and axilla were performed to screen for colonization with MRSA and CRKP. Follow-up was performed for positive cultures from sterile isolates, indicating infection. Positive MRSA and CRKP colonization or infection were identified, and patient notes were collected. Our exclusion criteria included patients with a of stay of <48 hours and patients with MRSA or CRKP before admission. Results: Of 3,641 of persons admitted 2,801 cases fit the study criteria. Overall, 161 (5.3%) were colonized or infected with MRSA alone, 215 (7.67%) were colonized or infected with CRKP alone, and 15 (0.53%) were colonized or infected with both MRSA and CRKP. In addition, 10 (66.6%) of patients colonized or infected with MRSA and CRKP died. Average length of stay of patients who died was 50 days. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that MRSA and CRKP cocolonization and coinfection is associated with high mortality in patients within the ICU and HDU units. Patients admitted to the ICU and HDU with an average length of stay of 50 days are at a higher risk for cocolonization and coinfection with MRSA and CRKP. Stronger IPC measures must be implemented to reduce the spread and occurrence of MRSA and CRKP.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Comparison of Respiratory Microbiome Disruption Indices to Predict VAP and VAE risk at LTACH Admission
Authors: Clarke Erik , Chiotos Kathleen None , Harrigan James , Lautenbach Ebbing , Reesey Emily , Wernovsky Magda , Tolomeo Pam , Morawski Zygmunt , Jacob Jerry , Grippi Michael , Kelly Brendan 
Published: November 2020

Background: Healthcare exposure results in significant microbiome disruption, particularly in the setting of critical illness, which may contribute to risk for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Patients admitted to long-term acute-care hospitals (LTACHs) have extensive prior healthcare exposure and critical illness; significant microbiome disruption has been previously documented among LTACH patients. We compared the predictive value of 3 respiratory tract microbiome disruption indices—bacterial community diversity, dominance, and absolute abundance—as they relate to risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and adverse ventilator-associated events (VAE), which commonly complicate LTACH care. Methods: We enrolled 83 subjects on admission to an academic LTACH for ventilator weaning and performed longitudinal sampling of endotracheal aspirates, followed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Illumina HiSeq), bacterial community profiling (QIIME2) for diversity, and 16S rRNA quantitative PCR (qPCR) for total bacterial abundance. Statistical analyses were performed with R and Stan software. Mixed-effects models were fit to relate the admission MDIs to subsequent clinically diagnosed VAP and VAE. Results: Of the 83 patients, 19 had been diagnosed with pneumonia during the 14 days prior to LTACH admission (ie, “recent past VAP”); 23 additional patients were receiving antibiotics consistent with empiric VAP therapy within 48 hours of admission (ie, “empiric VAP therapy”); and 41 patients had no evidence of VAP at admission (ie, “no suspected VAP”). We detected no statistically significant differences in admission Shannon diversity, maximum amplicon sequence variant (ASV)–level proportional abundance, or 16S qPCR across the variables of interest. In isolation, all 3 admission microbiome disruption indices showed poor predictive performance, though Shannon diversity performed better than maximum ASV abundance. Predictive models that combined (1) bacterial diversity or abundance with (2) recent prior VAP diagnosis and (3) concurrent antibiotic exposure best predicted 14-day VAP (type S error < 0.05) and 30-day VAP (type S error < 0.003). In this cohort, VAE risk was paradoxically associated with higher admission Shannon diversity and lower admission maximum ASV abundance. Conclusions: In isolation, respiratory tract microbiome disruption indices obtained at LTACH admission showed poor predictive performance for subsequent VAP and VAE. But diversity and abundance models incorporating recent VAP history and admission antibiotic exposure performed well predicting 14-day and 30-day VAP.Disclosures: NoneFunding: None
Containment Strategies for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Authors: Osuka Hanako , Park Benjamin J. , Lessa Fernanda 
Published: November 2020

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) represent one of the most critical emerging antimicrobial-resistance threats globally. Data from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) are increasingly reported as a part of global efforts to improve surveillance, and they demonstrate a high and increasing burden of CRE. However, containment of CRE using all recommended infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies requires substantial resources, which may be limited in LMICs. We conducted a review of the literature to better understand how approaches to CRE containment in LMICs have varied. Methods: We conducted a literature search using electronic databases (Medline, Embace, Cochrane Library, and Global Health) with no limit to study design or publication year. Search terms consisted of 3 categories: CRE, IPC, and LMIC. Additional publications were also identified from the references of identified articles. Publications were screened for eligibility; non-English articles and studies on other gram-negative organisms were excluded from the analysis. Control measures in included studies were categorized as active surveillance, hand hygiene, contact precautions, isolation, education, environmental control, monitoring and feedback, and other. Results: In total, 2,667 publications were identified using the databases and an additional 24 were manually identified. After deduplicating and screening for eligibility, 27 publications were included in the analysis. Overall, 21 publications (78%) were outbreak reports and 3 (11%) were quasi-experimental studies in settings of high rates of CRE. Also, 23 (85%) described a successful reduction in CRE. Among those 23 publications, 22 publications described adequate descriptions of IPC measures implemented, and the median number of IPC measures was 4.5 (range, 1–8). Environmental control was the most commonly utilized intervention (n = 19, 86%), followed by hand hygiene (n = 14, 64%) and contact precautions (n = 14, 64%). Three publications did not show a reduction in CRE despite the combination of IPC measures (median, 4.5). Overall, 13 publications utilized some method of active surveillance, but complete details on methodology were often lacking. In addition, 4 studies (15%) used only horizontal measures (defined as hand hygiene, environmental control, and/or education) and successfully controlled the CRE outbreaks. Conclusions: Among published reports, successful approaches to CRE control have been reported from LMICs. Use of only horizontal approaches, which are often lower cost and simpler to implement than some vertical strategies, have demonstrated some success; however, additional experience with identifying and implementing cost-effective strategies is needed.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Determining Antibiotic Use in Long-Term Care Facilities Across Tennessee
Authors: Adre Cullen , Ouedraogo Youssoufou , Evans Christopher David , Keaton Amelia , Kainer Marion 
Published: November 2020

Background: Antibiotic stewardship is an area of great concern in long-term care facilities nationwide. The CDC promotes 7 core elements of antimicrobial stewardship. Based on information obtained from the Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) Program, the 2 core elements most infrequently achieved by LTCFs are tracking and reporting. Currently, minimal data are available on antibiotic use (AU) in LTCFs in Tennessee. To address both issues, the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) developed a monthly antibiotic use (AU) point-prevalence (PP) survey to provide LTCFs with a free tool to both track and report their AU and to gather data on how LTCFs are using antibiotics. Methods: We used REDCap to create a questionnaire to collect information on selected antibiotics administered in Tennessee LTCFs. This self-administered survey was promoted through the TDH monthly antimicrobial stewardship and infection control (ASIC) call as well as at various conferences and speaking engagements across the state. Antimicrobial stewardship leads for each facility were targeted. Antibiotics were grouped into 4 classes according to their indications: C. difficile infections, urinary tract infections, skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) and respiratory infections. We determined AU percentage by dividing the number of days of therapy for a drug by a facility’s average census. Individualized reports are provided to each participating facility on a quarterly basis. Results: Currently, 16 facilities have participated in the survey. Overall, 40.7% of antibiotics prescribed were in the common for SSTI category and 39.3% were common for respiratory infections. The top 33 most commonly prescribed antibiotics were amoxicillin (156 days of therapy [DOT]), nitrofurantoin (92 DOT), and levofloxacin (88 DOT). The average percentage of residents on antimicrobials on the day of survey was 12.3%; within this group, 57% of antibiotics were initiated in the LTCF, whereas 43% were present upon admission. Conclusions: Early results from the TDH AU PP survey revealed that drugs commonly used for SSTIs and respiratory infection were the most common antibiotic prescriptions and a potential area of focus for TDH’s antimicrobial stewardship efforts. None of the 3 most frequently prescribed antibiotics, however, fall under the SSTI indication, despite SSTI being the most commonly prescribed indication based on the survey’s evaluation metrics. This finding could be related to the larger number of antibiotics that fall under the SSTI indication. Preliminary data are being used to guide the direction of TDH’s future ASIC calls to better suit disease states, which have room for improvement.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Digital Education on Prudent Antibiotic Use—Evaluation of a Massive Open Online Course for General Practitioners in Germany
Authors: Salm Florian , Kramer Tobias , Remschmidt Cornelius , Gastmeier Petra , Schneider Sandra 
Published: November 2020

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global health problem predominantly driven by overuse of antibiotics. In humans, most antibiotics are used outside the hospital. Overprescribing for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) is common despite clear guidelines. The need for further training of general practitioners is well known. Objective: To develop and evaluate a massive open online course (MOOC) on antibiotic therapy of common infectious diseases in general practice. Methods: A 4-week MOOC was developed on the basis of previous face-to-face trainings (platform, Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Engineering) and was conducted 3 times between July 10, 2017, and May 31, 2019. The course was promoted through various general practitioner (GP) networks, local multipliers, and conferences and in the local trade press. In addition to epidemiological background information, the focus was on guideline-based diagnostics and treatment of ARI, side effects of antibiotics, correct drug selection, dosage and duration of indicated antibiotic therapy, as well as aspects of doctor–patient communication. Content included videos, self-tests, additional written material, and an optional exam. At the end of the course, participants were asked to complete a voluntary, anonymous online assessment questionnaire (LimeSurveyPro software). Usage data from the MOOC platform and data from the questionnaire were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistical software. Results: In total, 2,177 registered persons retrieved content (= learners). The proportion of learners dropped from 99.6% in week 1 to 40.7% in week 4. However, among those attending week 4, the average proportion of content used was still high (74.5%). Furthermore, 27.5% of learners completed the course, 23.8% took the exam, and 19.7% passed the exam. Moreover, 284 learners answered the assessment questionnaire (response rate, 13.0%); 62.3% were women, and the mean age was 45.9 years. Also, 225 participants (79.2%) stated that they were physicians; 122 of these worked as general practitioners (54.2% of physicians). Among the other physicians, 23% stated were in specialist training and 15.6% had a different specialist designation. The average overall rating of the course was 1.31 (1 = very good to 6 = not sufficient). General practitioners rated it slightly better than other physicians (1.23 vs 1.41). The clinical relevance was rated at 1.27 (GPs vs other physicians, 1.18 vs 1.35). For all scores, see Table 1. Conclusions: A massive open online course appears to be an appropriate format in which to deliver clinical relevant content concerning prudent antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. It is a good complement to existing face-to-face formats and helps to cover needs related to antibiotic training.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Does the Fist Bump Transfer Less Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Than a Handshake?
Authors: Herrera Natalia Pinto , Jones Lucas , Cadnum Jennifer , Donskey Curtis 
Published: November 2020

Background: Contaminated hands are the most important source for transmission of pathogens in healthcare settings. It has been proposed that replacing the handshake with alternative greetings such as the fist bump might reduce the risk for pathogen transmission. Methods: In a cohort of 50 patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization, we compared the frequency of transfer of MRSA by handshake versus fist bump versus cruise tap (ie, a modified fist bump involving knuckle-to-knuckle contact with a single finger). MRSA-colonized patients performed each greeting with research personnel wearing sterile gloves, and cultures were obtained to determine the number of colonies transferred. Transfer by handshake was also assessed after MRSA-colonized patients used alcohol-based hand sanitizer. Quantitative cultures were obtained to compare the burden of MRSA on the palm versus dorsum of the hands of the MRSA carriers. Results: As shown in Fig. 1, there was a significant reduction in the frequency of MRSA transfer for the cruise tap compared to the handshake, but not for the fist bump. Use of alcohol-based hand sanitizer by MRSA carriers also significantly reduced the risk for transfer of MRSA. There was no significant difference in the burden of MRSA on the dorsum versus the palm of the hands (mean +SE colonies recovered, 32.7+12.3 vs 27.3+12.7; P > .05). Conclusions: The fist-bump greeting did not transfer less MRSA than a handshake. However, transfer was significantly reduced by a cruise-tap greeting or by handshake after the use of hand sanitizer. Modified greetings and patient hand hygiene are potential strategies to reduce transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Effective Utilization of Limited Isolation Rooms to Provide Safe Patient Care and Staff Safety in a Low- and Middle-Income Country
Authors: Roshanali Rozina 
Published: November 2020

Background: My tertiary-care hospital is a 750-bed hospital with only 17 airborne infection isolation room (AIIR) and negative-pressure rooms to isolate patients who have been diagnosed or are suspected with prevalent diseases like tuberculosis, measles, and chickenpox. On the other hand, only 14 single-patient isolation rooms are available to isolate patients with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) such as CRE (carbapenum-resistant Enterobacter) or colistin-resistant MDROs. Due to the limited number of isolation rooms, the average number of hours to isolate infected patients was ~20 hours, which ultimately directly placed healthcare workers (HCWs) at risk of exposure to infected patients. Methods: Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement methodology was utilized to decrease the average number of hours to isolate infected patients and to reduce the exposure of HCWs to communicable diseases. A detailed analysis were performed to identify root causes and their effects at multiple levels. A multidisciplinary team implemented several strategies: coordination with information and technology team to place isolation alerts in the charting system; screening flyers and questions at emergency department triage; close coordination with admission and bed management office; daily morning and evening rounds by infection preventionists in the emergency department; daily morning meeting with microbiology and bed management office to intervene immediately to isolate patients in a timely way; infection preventionist on-call system (24 hours per day, 7 days per week) to provide recommendations for patient placement and cohorting of infected patients wherever possible. Results: In 1 year, a significant reduction was achieved in the number of hours to isolate infected patients, from 20 hours to 4 hours. As a result, HCW exposures to communicable diseases also decreased from 6.7 to 1.5; HCW exposures to TB decreased from 6.0 to 1.9; exposures measles decreased from 4.75 to 1.5; and exposures chickenpox decreased from 7.3 to 1.0. Significant reductions in cost incurred by the organization for the employees who were exposed to these diseases for postexposure prophylaxis also decreased, from ~Rs. 290,000 (~US$3,000) to ~Rs. 59,520 (~US$600). Conclusions: This multidisciplinary approach achieved infection prevention improvements and enhanced patient and HCW safety in a limited-resource setting.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None