Changing transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in China: a nationwide population-based piecewise mathematical modelling study
Authors: Hou Jiawen , Hong Jie , Ji Boyun , Dong Bowen , Chen Yue , Ward Michael P. , Tu Wei , Jin Zhen , Hu Jian , Su Qing , Wang Wenge , Zhao Zheng , Xiao Shuang , Huang Jiaqi , Lin Wei , Zhang Zhijie 
Published: March 2020

AbstractBackgroundThe first case of COVID-19 atypical pneumonia was reported in Wuhan, China on December 1, 2019. Since then, at least 33 other countries have been affected and there is a possibility of a global outbreak. A tremendous amount of effort has been made to understand its transmission dynamics; however, the temporal and spatial transmission heterogeneity and changing epidemiology have been mostly ignored. The epidemic mechanism of COVID-19 remains largely unclear.MethodsEpidemiological data on COVID-19 in China and daily population movement data from Wuhan to other cities were obtained and analyzed. To describe the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 at different spatio-temporal scales, we used a three-stage continuous-time Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) meta-population model based on the characteristics and transmission dynamics of each stage: 1) local epidemic from December 1, 2019 to January 9, 2020; 2) long-distance spread due to the Spring Festival travel rush from January 10 to 22, 2020; and 3) intra-provincial transmission from January 23, 2020 when travel restrictions were imposed. Together with the basic reproduction number (R0) for mathematical modelling, we also considered the variation in infectivity and introduced the controlled reproduction number (Rc) by assuming that exposed individuals to be infectious; we then simulated the future spread of COVID across Wuhan and all the provinces in mainland China. In addition, we built a novel source tracing algorithm to infer the initial exposed number of individuals in Wuhan on January 10, 2020, to estimate the number of infections early during this epidemic.FindingsThe spatial patterns of disease spread were heterogeneous. The estimated controlled reproduction number (Rc) in the neighboring provinces of Hubei province were relatively large, and the nationwide reproduction number ‐ except for Hubei ‐ ranged from 0.98 to 2.74 with an average of 1.79 (95% CI 1.77‐1.80). Infectivity was significantly greater for exposed than infectious individuals, and exposed individuals were predicted to have become the major source of infection after January 23. For the epidemic process, most provinces reached their epidemic peak before February 10, 2020. It is expected that the maximum number of infections will be approached by the end of March. The final infectious size is estimated to be about 58,000 for Wuhan, 20,800 for the rest of Hubei province, and 17,000 for the other provinces in mainland China. Moreover, the estimated number of the exposed individuals is much greater than the officially reported number of infectious individuals in Wuhan on January 10, 2020.InterpretationThe transmission dynamics of COVID-19 have been changing over time and were heterogeneous across regions. There was a substantial underestimation of the number of exposed individuals in Wuhan early in the epidemic, and the Spring Festival travel rush played an important role in enhancing and accelerating the spread of COVID-19. However, China’s unprecedented large-scale travel restrictions quickly reducedRc. The next challenge for the control of COVID-19 will be the second great population movement brought by removing these travel restrictions.