Rituximab Plus Lenalidomide Versus Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in Need of Therapy. First Analysis of Survival Endpoints of the Randomized Phase-2 Trial SAKK 35/10
Authors: Kimby Eva , Rondeau Stephanie , Vanazzi Anna , Ostenstad Bjorn , Mey Ulrich J.M. , Rauch Daniel , Wahlin Björn E , Hitz Felicitas , Hernberg Micaela , Johansson Ann-Sofie , de Nully Brown Peter , Hagberg Hans , Ferreri Andres J.M. , Lohri Andreas , Novak Urban , Zander Thilo , Bersvendsen Hanne , Bergetzi Mario , Mingrone Walter , Krasniqi Fatime , Dirnhofer Stefan , Hawle Hanne , Berardi Simona , Ghielmini Michele , Zucca Emanuele 
Published: November 2019

Abstract
Background: The randomized phase-2 trial SAKK 35/10 was conducted by the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and the Nordic Lymphoma Group (NLG) to compare the activity of single-agent rituximab versus rituximab plus lenalidomide in the first-line treatment of symptomatic follicular lymphoma (FL). The results of primary endpoint (complete remission [CR/CRu] at week 23) assessment were previously reported, showing that addition of lenalidomide to rituximab results in a significantly higher CR/CRu rate at the expected cost of increased but manageable toxicity (Kimby et al. Blood 2014.124 (21):799; Zucca et al. Hematol Oncol 2015. 33(s1): 105). Here we report the first analysis of secondary endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS), time to next anti-lymphoma treatment (TTNT), CR duration, as well as CR/CRu rate at 30 months (CR30).
Methods: 154 patients (pts) with grade 1 to 3a FL, untreated and in need of systemic therapy, were randomized to receive either rituximab (375mg/m2 at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 14 and 15) or rituximab (same schedule) plus lenalidomide (15 mg daily, from 14 days before the first until 14 days after the last rituximab administration). The sample size was calculated to allow the detection of a 20% increase of the CR/Cru rate with 90% power and type I error 0.10; a one-sided Z-test for proportions was used to compare the two arms. Treatment was discontinued in pts who did not achieve at least a 25% reduction in the sum of products of tumor diameters at week 10. Primary and secondary endpoints were defined according to the NCI international standardized criteria (Cheson et al 1999).
Results: 77 pts (median age 63 years, 52% with stage IV and 47% with poor-risk FLIPI score) were allocated in the single-agent rituximab arm and 77 (median age 61 years, 48% with stage IV and 47% with poor-risk FLIPI score) in the combination arm. A higher CR/CRu rate in the combination arm was documented both by the investigator assessment (36% vs 25%) and by the independent response reviewers of CT scans (61% vs. 36%). Adverse events of grade ≥3 were more common (56% vs 22% of pts) in the combination arm, including neutropenia (23% vs 7%). At a median follow up of 3.1 years, a longer CR duration was seen for the pts in the combination arm (median not reached vs 2.3 years) as well as a longer PFS (median not reached vs. 2.3 years), these differences were not statistically significant. The CR30, recently identified as a reliable surrogate of PFS (Sargent et al. Hematol Oncol 2015. 33(s1): 166), was significantly improved by the addition of lenalidomide to rituximab (42% vs 19%, p=0.001). Moreover, TTNT was significantly longer with the combination (median not reached vs 2.1 years, p=0.02) [Figure1]. Overall survival rates at 3 years were 93% and 92%, respectively.
Conclusions: The SAKK 35/10 randomized trial confirmed that lenalidomide plus rituximab is an active and feasible initial treatment for FL pts in need of therapy. Addition of lenalidomide significantly increased the CR/CRu rate at week 23 (primary endpoint) and was maintained throughout 30 months. Although the trial was not powered to detect survival differences (secondary endpoints), a significantly better TTNT and a trend towards prolonged PFS and CR duration was seen in the combination arm. The excellent overall survival in both arms suggests that chemotherapy-free strategies should be further explored.
Figure 1. Time to next anti-lymphoma therapy by treatment arm Figure 1. Time to next anti-lymphoma therapy by treatment arm

Disclosures
Kimby: Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lecture at educational session; Celgene: Other: Honoraria for lecture. educational meeting; Pfizer: Other: Research grant; Roche: Other: Honoraria for lecture in educational meetings; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: honoraria for educational lecture in meeting sponsored by Gilead. Mey:roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wahlin:Roche: Consultancy. Hernberg:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. de Nully Brown:Roche: Research Funding. Ferreri:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zander:Bristol Myers, Celgene, Amgen, Mundipharma, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.