Incidence, Predictors, and Significance of Severe Toxicity in Patients with HIV-Associated Hodgkin Lymphoma
Authors: Ezzat Hatoon , Cheung Matthew C , Hicks Lisa K , Murphy Kevin C , Leger Chantal S , Taggart Linda R , Boro Jordana , Montaner Julio SG , Harris Marianne , Vickars Linda M , Leitch Heather A 
Published: April 2020

Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) occurs in HIV-infected individuals more frequently than in the HIV-negative population and the incidence is rising. Patients (pts) with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in HIV appear to have improved outcomes if they receive HAART with chemotherapy (CT). ABVD is standard CT for HL and is frequently administered with HAART in pts with HIV-HL. However, some components of the ABVD regimen may interact with antiretroviral (ARV) medications to alter metabolism and increase toxicity. In particular, vinblastine (VBL) is metabolized by CYP3A4 and protease inhibitors, particularly ritonavir (RTV), appear to inhibit this cytochrome potentially leading to higher VBL exposure. Little definitive information is available regarding how interactions might affect clinical outcome. We conducted a retrospective review of 36 pts with HIV-related HL to identify the frequency of neurotoxicity (NT), hematologic toxicity (HT), and lung toxicity (LT), to identify risk factors for severe (grade III–IV) toxicity, and to determine its clinical significance. Clinical data were collected from the CFE database and by chart review from 3 centers. The median age at HL diagnosis (dx) was 41 (range 29–66) years and 34 (94%) were male. HL was advanced stage in 28 (78%). Hasenclever score could be calculated in 23 pts and was 0–4 and ≥5 in 15 and 8 pts respectively. ECOG PS was 0–1 in 13 and ≥2 in 8 (n=21). HIV risk factor was: sexual, n=21 and other, n=5 (n=26). Median CD4 count at HL dx was 210 (2–660) cells/ul (n=31). Median HIV viral load (VL) was undetectable (&lt;50; range &lt;50-&gt;500,000) copies/ml (n=25). Hepatitis B and C coinfection was present in 8 and 7 pts respectively (n=29). Prior AIDS was present in 23, all opportunistic infections. Twenty-four pts received HAART with CT. Primary HL CT was: ABVD, n=29 (81%); MOPP/ABV, n=4 (11%); palliative, n=3 (8%). G-CSF was used in 22 pts. All pts received prophylaxis for PCP and 3 for HSV/VZV. HAART included 17 Arts in numerous combinations. Infectious complications were: bacterial infection, n=6; febrile neutropenia, n=4; HSV, n=3; PCP, n=1. HT occurred in 21 (75%) of 28 assessable pts and was grade 3–4 in 18 (64%; 18 and 15 were on HAART, respectively). NT occurred in 14 (50%) pts and was grade 3–4 in 6 (21%; 13 and 5 on HAART respectively, n=28). Of 6 cases of severe NT, 3 were autonomic neuropathy with pseudobowel obstruction that in 1 pt resulted in perforation. Bleomycin LT occurred in 3 pts (n=26). CT dose reduction (DR) of ≥25% in ≥1 agent was required in 9 pts (n=26). Factors associated with grade 3–4 HT were: receiving RTV, p=0.04, HR 2.9 (95% CI 1.1–7.4); and receiving lopinovir (LPV), p=0.02, HR 7.0 (2.3–21.3) and for any HT were: RTV, p=0.004, HR 3.1 (1.3–7.3); emtricitabine, p=0.01, HR 4.8 (1.4–11.6); and LPV, p=0.04, HR 4.4 (1.6–12.1). Factors for grade 3–4 NT were: LPV, p=0.05, HR 10.8 (2.0–59.5) and for any NT was: RTV, p=0.01, HR 4.0 (1.3–12.1). Fourteen pts received RTV and of 8 receiving LPV, 7 received LPV with RTV (p=0.007). At a median follow-up of 15.3 (0.1–154.8) months (mo) 25 pts (69%) are alive. The median overall survival (OS) for all pts was 44.5 (2–154.8) mo and there was no difference in OS by baseline features or the occurrence of HT or NT. However, CT dose reduction was associated with inferior OS (p=0.04, HR 3.9 [1.0–15.7]); although only 1 of 9 deaths was from HL progression; others were: infectious, n=6; and unrelated, n=2. In conclusion, pts with HIV-HL appear to experience a significantly increased incidence of NT compared to rates reported in non-HIV HL pts. In contrast, rates of HT and LT appear to be similar to those in non-HIV HL. The use of RTV or LPV during CT appeared to be associated with an increased risk of NT, suggesting a clinically significant interaction between these ARV agents and CT, particularly VBL. Prospective studies to devise a rational dosing strategy using measurements of ARV and/or CT levels are warranted.