bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
A phase I trial targeting advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer using a combination of standard chemotherapy and adoptively transferred nonengineered, multiantigen specific T cells in the first-line setting (TACTOPS).
Authors: Smaglo Brandon George , Musher Benjamin Leon , Vasileiou Spyridoula , Kuvalekar Manik , Watanabe Ayumi , Robertson Catherine , Wang Tao , Francois Monica , Ramos Carlos Almeida , Hill LaQuisa , Van Buren George , Fisher William , Armaghany Tannaz , Sada Yvonne , Vera Valdes Juan Fernando , Grilley Bambi , Gee Adrian P , Heslop Helen E. , Lulla Premal D. , Leen Ann M. 
Published: May 2020

4622 Background: Immunotherapy is emerging as a potent therapy for a range of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. To target pancreatic carcinoma we have developed an autologous, non-engineered T cell therapy using T cell lines that simultaneously target the tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) PRAME, SSX2, MAGEA4, NY-ESO-1 and Survivin. These multiTAA-specific T-cell lines could be consistently prepared by culturing PBMCs in the presence of a Th1-polarizing/pro-proliferative cytokine cocktail, and adding autologous pepmix-loaded DCs as APCs. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who achieved cancer control with three months of standard chemotherapy were eligible to receive up to 6 infusions of multiTAA T-cells (fixed dose - 1x107 cells/m2). While also continuing the same chemotherapy, T-cells were given at monthly intervals from month four, onwards. The primary study endpoints were safety and feasibility of completing all 6 planned infusions, with secondary and tertiary endpoints including anti-tumor effects, patient survival, in vivo expansion and T cell persistence of the infused cells as well as recruitment of the endogenous immune system. Results: Between June 2018 and December 2019, we treated 13 patients with multiTAA T-cells. For 12/13 patients, we generated sufficient cells for all 6 planned doses; 2 doses were available for the remaining patient. Of the 13 patients, 8 maintained cancer control for a longer than expected duration, compared to historical controls. With administration of T-cells, 3 of these 8 patients had partial responses and 1 patient had a radiographic complete response (per RECIST). These responses were seen in patients with metastatic cancer. Notably, no patient had infusion-related systemic- or neuro-toxicity. Thus, infusion of autologous multiTAA-targeted T cells directed to PRAME, SSX2, MAGEA4, NY-ESO-1 and Survivin has been safe and provided durable clinical benefit to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: Autologous, TAA cytotoxic T-cells can reliably be generated and safely administered to patients in conjunction with standard of care chemotherapy. In some patients, addition of T-cells may extend duration of first line therapy cancer control and induce additional tumor responses, and activation of the endogenous immune system has been documented in all patients. Exploration in a higher phase study is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03192462 .
Survival outcomes of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer treated with upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective tertiary care center experience.
Authors: Liu Fang , Mirsky Matthew , Wu Sulin , Fu Pingfu , Cao Shufen , Shanahan John , Kyasaram Ravi Kumar , Jain Prantesh , Hardacre Jeffrey , Ammori John Brian , Winter Jordan Michael , Bajor David Lawrence 
Published: May 2020

4623 Background: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) remains controversial. We sought to compare the outcomes of NAC with upfront surgery (UFS). Methods: The study retrospectively enrolled patients with RPC who had UFS or received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (GA). Between-group differences were assessed with T-test for continuous variables, and Chi-square / Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method with Wilcoxon test for the difference between groups. The effects of NAC vs. UFS on OS and RFS were further estimated using Cox regression controlling the effects of age and CA 19-9. Results: Between 2011 and 2019, 131 patients with RPC underwent UFS followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine, n = 65; gemcitabine/capecitabine, n = 18; FFX, n = 9). Up to 32 patients (24.4%) could not receive adjuvant chemotherapy due to surgical complications or poor recovery. Total 50 patients with RPC received NAC (FFX, n = 32; GA, n = 18). Median of 5.5 cycles of FFX or 3 cycles of GA were given prior to surgery. Resection rate was 72% (FFX 62.5%; GA 88.9%). The rest (28%) were no longer surgical candidates due to disease progression rather than toxicities from NAC. On surgical pathological review, complete resection (R0) was achieved in 83.3% of resected cases after NAC (FFX 90%; GA 75%) and 79.4% with UFS. The tumor size distribution was: pT1 11.1%, pT2 41.7%, pT3 44.4% with NAC; pT1 5.4%, pT2 18.3%, pT3 76.3% with UFS. The nodal status distribution was: pN0 27.8%, pN1 55.5%, pN2 16.7% with NAC; pN0 23.7%, pN1 71.0%, pN2 5.3% with UFS. Median pre-treatment CA 19-9 was 321.95 unit/mL in the NAC group and 79.99 unit/mL in the UFS group (p = 0.009). Median age was 70.5 in the NAC group and 72 in the UFS group (p = 0.374). There was no significant difference in the performance status between the two groups. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was a significant difference of OS between UFS and NAC with median OS of 648 days under UFS versus 884 days under NAC (p = 0.029); the median of RFS was 390 days under UFS versus 392 days under NAC (p = 0.953). The hazard ratio (NAC vs UFS) adjusted for CA19-9 and age was 0.7 (p = 0.176) for OS and 0.98 (p = 0.918) for RFS. Conclusions: We observed a signal of tumor downstaging, higher R0 rate, and improved OS with NAC compared with UFS. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these results.
Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin versus FOLFIRINOX as the second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Multicenter study of the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG).
Authors: Chon Hongjae , Park Hyung Soon , Kang Beodeul , Im Hyeon-Su , Lee Choong-kun , Kim Ilhwan , Kang Myoung Joo , Hwang Jun-Eul , Bae Woo Kyun , Cheon Jaekyung , Hong Jung Yong , Kang Jung Hun , Kim Jung Hoon , Lim Sung Hee , Kim Jin Won , Kim Ji-Won , Yoo Changhoon , Choi Hye Jin , Park Joon Oh 
Published: May 2020

4624 Background: There is no clear consensus on the second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability between liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouralcil/leucovorin (FL) and FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin/irinotecan/leucovorin/fluorouracil) in patients who failed to first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. Methods: In this retrospective study, 378 mPC patients who received nal-IRI/FL (n = 104) or FOLFIRINOX (n = 274) as the second-line treatment across 11 institutions from January 2015 to August 2019 were analyzed. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS), and secondary end points were overall survival (OS), overall response rate, and tolerability. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, except first-line regimen (previous gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, nal-IRI/FL, 85.6% vs. FOLFIRINOX, 51.5%; previous gemcitabine monotherapy, 5.8% vs. 24.5%). The median follow-up time was 6.0 months. The median PFS (nal-IRI/FL, 3.7 months vs. FOLFIRINOX, 5.0 months) and OS (nal-IRI/FL, 7.7 months vs. FOLFRINOX, 9.7 months) were comparable between two groups (P = 0.40 and 0.13, respectively). The overall response rate was not significantly different between two groups (nal-IRI/FL, 14% vs. FOLFRINOX, 16%; P = 0.644). In multivariate analysis, poor ECOG status, presence of liver metastasis, high NLR, and high CA19-9 were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS, but chemotherapy regimen (nal-IRI/FL vs. FOLFRINOX) was not. In a subgroup analysis of patients with liver metastasis, FOLFIRINOX exerted significant PFS (median: 2.1 months vs. 4.1 months for nal-IRI/FL vs. FOLFIRINOX, respectively; P = 0.02) and OS (median: 6.7 months vs. 8.4 months for nal-IRI/FL vs. FOLFIRINOX, respectively; P = 0.04) benefit compared with nal-IRI/FL. Grade 3 neutropenia or higher were more frequently observed in FOLFIRINOX (47.2%) than nal-IRI/FL (35%) (P = 0.033). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was also common in FOLFIRIONX (5.9%) group compared with nal-IRI/FL (1.0%) (P = 0.049). Conclusions: In second-line setting for mPC after progression on gemcitabine-based therapy, both nal-IRI/FL and FOLFIRINOX regimen showed comparable efficacy and acceptable safety outcomes. FOLFIRINOX regimen might be preferentially considered in patients with liver metastasis.
Paclitaxel protein bound (A) plus gemcitabine (G) plus cisplatin (C), and paricalcitol (P)neoadjuvant therapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Authors: Borazanci Erkut Hasan , Jameson Gayle S. , Snyder Courtney Edwards , Tsai Frank Yung-Chin , Gordon Michael S. , Sharma Sunil , Guarnieri Carol , Thosani Amar , Rahmanuddin Syed , Korn Ronald Lee , Sckolnik Steven , Salontai Sharon , Wyman Rachel , Haag Susan , Gosselin Kevin , Von Hoff Daniel D. , Amini Albert 
Published: May 2020

4631 Background: Localized PDAC management has recently evolved. Due to concerns over micro metastases at diagnosis the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for PDAC has become more common. Typical therapies involve the use of multiagent systemic chemotherapies with or without radiation therapy. In retrospective studies, Cancer Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) normalization in borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) PDAC has been associated with greater OS. The addition of cisplatin (C) to gemcitabine (G) and paclitaxel protein bound (A), has shown promising clinical data in a previously reported study in advanced PDAC [JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(1):125-132]. We conducted a prospective, phase 2 clinical trial of patients with resectable (R), BR, and LA PDAC utilizing a regimen combining A + G + C + paricalcitol (P) with the primary endpoint of CA 19-9 normalization (NCT03138720). Methods: Eligibility criteria include patients with histologically confirmed R, BR, or LA PDAC, elevated CA 19-9, and a KPS ≥ 70% with normal end organ function. Doses are A 125 mg/m2, G 1000 mg/m2, C 25 mg/ m2, P at a fixed dose of 25 µg on days 1, 8 of a 21-day cycle (all treatment IV). Primary objective is to evaluate CA 19-9 normalization with the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary objectives are to assess R0 rate, pathologic complete response (pCR), safety and tolerability, radiologic response rate, and 2 year overall survival (OS) from date of study entry. Exploratory objectives include evaluating imaging biomarkers and vascular involvement by tumor in relation to therapy. Results: To date 24 of the planned 24 patients have been enrolled. 13 male, 11 female; age range 49 to 84 yo. Patient classifications is 8 R; 7 BR; 9 LAPC. Median baseline CA 19-9 156 (range 45-3674). Most common drug related grade (gr) 3-4 adverse events (AEs) are: thrombocytopenia gr 3 29%, gr 4 25%, anemia gr 3 45.8%, gr 4 4.2%, and hypophosphatemia gr 3 8.3%. CA 19-9 normalization occurred in 50% (12/24) who have completed at least 1 cycle of treatment. To date, 14 individuals went to surgery, with 13/14 achieving R0, (1 pCR). Overall response rate in measurable patients is 38% (1 CR, 8 PR). Median OS and 2-year survival data are not yet matured. Conclusions: In patients with non-metastatic PDAC, the use of A+G+C+P resulted in a CA 19-9 normalization rate in 50% of individuals. The study is ongoing and OS data is maturing. Clinical trial information: NCT03138720 .
Interim data: Phase I/IIa study of EGFR-targeted EDV nanocells carrying cytotoxic drug PNU-159682 (E-EDV-D682) with immunomodulatory adjuvant EDVs carrying α-galactosyl ceramide (EDV-GC) in patients with recurrent, metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Lundy Joanne , Marx Gavin M. , MacDiarmid Jennifer , Brahmbhatt Himanshu , Ganju Vinod 
Published: May 2020

4632 Background: Targeted EDV nanocells loaded with doxorubicin and microRNA16a have shown excellent safety profiles in Phase I trials in recurrent glioma and mesothelioma. This planned safety analysis of an ongoing first-in-human, open label Phase I/IIa study in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer, assesses safety, biologic and clinical activity of EGFR-targeted EDV nanocells carrying cytotoxic drug PNU-159682, designed to overcome drug resistance, combined with EDV nanocells carrying immunomodulatory adjuvant α-galactosyl ceramide, designed to stimulate anti-tumour immune response. Methods: 9 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer enrolled in the dose escalation phase to evaluate safety of the EDV combination. Doses gradually escalated from 2 x 109 EDVs/dose to a maximum of 7 x 109 EDVs/dose in Week 7, with subsequent dosing at the maximum dose achieved in Cycle 1. iRECIST criteria was used to assess tumour response after each cycle, and blood was collected each cycle for cytokine and PBMC analysis. Results: Combination EDVs were well tolerated with no DLTs, and no drug related SAEs. A minority of patients experienced G1 infusion reactions, which responded promptly to supportive treatment. PR or SD was achieved at 8 weeks in 8/9 patients (CBR 89%), with responses confirmed at 4 months in 4/5 evaluable patients (80%), with 2 durable responses seen beyond 6 months. Exploratory analyses have revealed elevation of IFN-α and IFN-γ in almost all evaluable patients (6/8). In addition, we observed elevated CD8+ T cells (2/8), iNKT, dendritic and NK cells (3/8), and a reduction in exhausted CD8+ T cells (3/8), suggesting activation of both innate and adaptive immune responses. Conclusions: EDVs carrying the cytotoxic drug and immune adjuvant are safe and well tolerated. Early signals point to durable responses, possibly related to the development of an innate and adaptive immune response along with cytotoxic effects on drug resistant tumour cells. The Phase IIa study plans to enrol an additional 35 patients to further evaluate safety and anti-tumour efficacy. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12619000385145 .
A phase Ib study of sEphB4-HSA combined with first-line chemotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic (PC) and biliary cancers (BC).
Authors: Hanna Diana L. , Iqbal Syma , Habib Diane , Tsao-Wei Denice D. , Barzi Afsaneh , Thomas Jacob Stephen , Chiu Victor , Siddiqi Imran , Bhavsar Rishi D. , Jensen Nicole G. , DeLeon Cristina , Lenz Heinz-Josef , Gill Parkash S. , El-Khoueiry Anthony B. 
Published: May 2020

4640 Background: EphB4, a receptor kinase expressed in most epithelial tumors, binds EphrinB2 to affect cancer cell growth, apoptosis and angiogenesis. EphB4 overexpression is associated with advanced stage and shorter survival in multiple cancers. sEphB4-HSA, the albumin-bound extracellular fragment of EphB4, is a first-in-class inhibitor which blocks EphB4-EphrinB2 bidirectional signaling and results in downstream suppression of KRAS, PI3K, and promotes recruitment of CD3 and CD8 T cells into the tumor. The RP2D of sEphB4-HSA is 10 mg/Kg IV q week. Here, we report on sEphB4-HSA in combination with standard first-line chemotherapy. Methods: Pts with advanced PC or BC and no prior therapy for metastatic disease were eligible and enrolled into separate cohorts. Pts with PC received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 + nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle. Pts with BC received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 + cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 of a 21-day cycle. sEphB4-HSA 10 mg/kg IV was given weekly starting in Cycle 2. Response was assessed every 2 cycles. Primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, PFS, OS. Expression of EphrinB2 and EphB4 in tumor was examined by IHC and classified as 1+ (weak staining); 2+ (moderate staining); 3+ (strong, uniform staining). Results: A total of 44 pts with advanced PC (n = 21) and BC (n = 23; 70% gallbladder cancer) were enrolled. Median age 66 yrs; ECOG 1 (70%), 52% male. Median number of cycles received were 5 (PC) and 7 (BC). Median PFS was 5.6 mo in PC and 5.8 mo in BC (95% CI: 3.1-8.1 [PC]; 2.7-7.0 [BC]). Median OS was 7.9 mo in PC and 9.1 mo in BC (95% CI: 6.5-15.0 [PC]; 5.4-15.0 [BC]). In response evaluable pts (20 PC, 22 BC), ORR was 40% in PC (95% CI: 21%, 63%) and 23% in BC (95% CI: 9%, 45%). Stable disease was noted in 48% of PC and 61% of BC pts. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs in ≥10% of pts in both cohorts combined were hypertension (n = 16; 36%), neutropenia (n = 15; 34%), anemia (n = 14; 32%), thrombocytopenia (n = 7, 16%), fatigue (n = 7, 16%). In the PC cohort, there was an association between EphB4 expression and objective response (p = 0.009). Conclusions: sEphB4-HSA has a manageable safety profile in combination with chemotherapy in pts with PC and BC. Clinical activity is manifested by a high disease control rate in both cohorts and a promising RR in PC. Additional biomarker analyses will be presented. Future studies combining chemoimmunotherapy with sEphB4-HSA in pancreatic cancer are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02495896 .
Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Updated analysis of KEYNOTE-426.
Authors: Plimack Elizabeth R. , Rini Brian I. , Stus Viktor , Gafanov Rustem , Waddell Tom , Nosov Dmitry , Pouliot Frédéric , Soulieres Denis , Melichar Bohuslav , Vynnychenko Ihor , Azevedo Sergio Jobim , Borchiellini Delphine , McDermott Raymond S. , Bedke Jens , Tamada Satoshi , Yin Lina , Chen Mei , Molife L. Rhoda , Atkins Michael B. , Powles Thomas 
Published: May 2020

5001 Background: The randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 study (NCT02853331) demonstrated that pembrolizumab (pembro) + axitinib (axi) significantly improved OS, PFS, and ORR vs sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced RCC (aRCC) at the first pre-planned interim analysis (minimum study follow-up of 7 mo). Updated analyses are presented here. Methods: Treatment-naive patients (pts) with clear cell aRCC, KPS ≥70%, and measurable disease (RECIST v1.1) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembro 200 mg IV Q3W for up to 35 doses + axi 5 mg orally BID or sunitinib 50 mg orally QD on a 4-wk on/2-wk off schedule until progression, toxicity, or withdrawal. Randomization was stratified by IMDC risk (favorable vs intermediate vs poor) and geographic region (North America vs Western Europe vs rest of world). Primary end points were OS and PFS. Secondary end points were ORR, DOR, and safety. All P values are nominal. A post-hoc exploratory analysis was done to evaluate association of depth of response (maximum reduction from baseline in sum of diameters of target lesions) and OS using landmark analysis up to 6 mo after randomization. Results: 861 pts were randomly assigned (pembro + axi, n = 432; sunitinib, n = 429). Median (range) duration of follow-up for all pts was 27.0 mo (0.1-38.4). Pembro + axi improved OS (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.55-0.85]; P < 0.001; 24-mo OS rate, 74% vs 66%) vs sunitinib. Median (95% CI) OS was not reached with pembro + axi and was 35.7 mo (33.3-NR) with sunitinib. Pembro + axi improved PFS (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.60-0.84]; P < 0.001; 24-mo PFS rate, 38% vs 27%) vs sunitinib. For pembro +axi vs sunitinib respectively, median (95% CI) PFS was 15.4 (12.7-18.9) vs 11.1 mo (9.1-12.5); ORR was 60% vs 40% ( P < 0.0001); CR rate was 9% vs 3%; and median DOR was 23.5 mo (range 1.4+ to 34.5+) vs 15.9 mo (range 2.3-31.8+). In general, the pembro + axi benefit was observed in all subgroups tested, including IMDC risk and PD-L1 expression subgroups. Post-hoc landmark analysis at 6-mo showed that pts on pembro + axi with ≥80% target lesion reduction had OS similar to that of pts with CR per RECIST v1.1 based on Kaplan-Meier curves and HR [95% CI] estimates (0.20 [0.05-0.84] vs. 0.10 [0.01-0.76], respectively) vs pts with 0-30% target lesion reduction. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: Pembro + axi continued to demonstrate superior and durable antitumor activity vs sunitinib in pts with first-line aRCC with a 27-mo median follow up; no new safety signals were observed. Clinical trial information: NCT02853331 .
Phase II study of the oral HIF-2α inhibitor MK-6482 for Von Hippel-Lindau disease–associated renal cell carcinoma.
Authors: Jonasch Eric , Donskov Frede , Iliopoulos Othon , Rathmell Wendy Kimryn , Narayan Vivek , Maughan Benjamin Louis , Oudard Stephane , Else Tobias , Maranchie Jodi K. , Welsh Sarah J. , Thamake Sanjay , Park Eric Kristopher , Zojwalla Naseem J. , Perini Rodolfo F. , Linehan W. Marston , Srinivasan Ramaprasad 
Published: May 2020

5003 Background: Patients (pts) with Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) are at risk for several cancers, including clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Inactivation of VHL results in constitutive activation of the HIF-2α transcription factor, which drives tumor growth. MK-6482, a potent, selective, small molecule HIF-2α inhibitor, has shown favorable safety and antitumor activity in a phase 1/2 study. We present initial results of the open-label phase 2 study of MK-6482 for treatment of VHL-associated ccRCC (NCT03401788). Methods: Adult pts with a pathogenic germline VHL variation, measurable localized/nonmetastatic ccRCC, no prior systemic anticancer therapy, and ECOG PS of 0/1 received MK-6482 120 mg orally once daily until progression, intolerable toxicity, or investigator/pt decision to withdraw. Primary end point was ORR of VHL-associated ccRCC tumors per RECIST v1.1 by independent radiology review. Secondary end points were DOR, time to response (TTR), PFS, and safety and tolerability. Results: As of December 6, 2019, 61 pts were enrolled; median (range) age was 41 years (19-66) and most pts were male (52.5%) and had ECOG PS of 0 (82.0%). The most common lesions outside the kidney (non-RCC tumors) were CNS hemangioblastomas (80.3%) and pancreatic lesions (50.8%). Median (range) duration of treatment was 9.9 mo (1.9-18.2) and 95.1% of pts remain on therapy. Three pts discontinued (AE, n = 1; death [fentanyl toxicity], n = 1; pt decision, n = 1). There were 17 confirmed responses (ORR, 27.9% [95% CI, 17.1-40.8%]) and 8 (13.1%) unconfirmed (documented at 1 timepoint and to be confirmed at subsequent timepoint) responses; all responses were PRs. Of 61 pts, 53 (86.9%) had decrease in size of target lesions. In 17 pts with confirmed response, median (range) DOR was not reached (2.1-9.0 mo) and median (range) TTR was 5.5 mo (2.7-14.0). Responses were also observed in CNS, retinal, and pancreatic lesions. Median PFS was not reached; 12-mo PFS rate was 98.3%. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 96.7% of pts, mostly grade 1 (44.3%) or grade 2 (42.6%) and primarily (≥20%) anemia (83.6%; considered an on-target-toxicity), fatigue (49.2%), and dizziness (21.3%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 9.8% of pts, primarily fatigue (4.9%) and anemia (3.3%). There were no grade 4 or 5 TRAEs. One pt discontinued because of a TRAE (dizziness). Conclusions: MK-6482 showed promising efficacy and tolerability in pts with VHL-associated ccRCC and responses in other VHL-related lesions. These data support further investigation of MK-6482 in VHL disease. Clinical trial information: NCT03401788 .