bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Final results of the AIO 0307 study: A controlled, randomized, double-blind phase II study of FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI combined with sorafenib (S) versus placebo (P) in second-line metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) treatment.
Authors: Hoehler Thomas , Decker Thomas , Schimanski Christoph , Schmitz Stephan H. , Kanzler Stephan , Rauh Jacqueline , Vehling-Kaiser Ursula , Bernhard Helga , Hoffmann Thomas , Niederle Norbert , Von Verschuer Ulla , von Wichert Goetz , Wagner Thomas 
Published: March 2020

3586 Background: The oral multikinase inhibitor Sorafenib (S) inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth in preclinical models of CRC. This study investigated the addition of S to standard 2nd line chemotherapy (CTX). Methods: Patients (pts) with mCRC and progression after first-line therapy with an oxaliplatin- or irinotecan based fluoropyrimidine containing regimen ± Bevacizumab (Bev), were randomized to receive chemotherapy (CTX) (FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI) + S (400 mg bid) or CTX + placebo (P). 240 pts were planned to be enrolled to ensure a power of 80% if median progression-free survival (PFS) with S is increased by 2 months compared to P. Results: Between 04/09 and 10/11, 101 pts were enrolled. Recruitment was stopped prematurely due to slow accrual. 97 pts were evaluable in the full analysis set. Median age was 65 years, 60 pts were male, 97% with ECOG 0 or 1. Median PFS was 5.2 months (mths) in S and 5.6 mths in P (HR 0.84, 90% CI 0.58, 1.22, p=0.439). Best response rate was 25.6% and 12.2% (p=0.106), respectively. Disease control rates were comparable. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 mths with S compared to 12.7 mths with P (HR 1.57, 90% CI 1.03, 2.41, p = 0.076). Difference in OS was even more pronounced in subgroup (n=41) with FOLFOX6 backbone (9.6 vs. 13.8 mths, HR 2.37, 90% CI 1.22, 4.60, p=0.026). In 69 Bev-pretreated pts OS was 8.4 vs. 14.9 mths (HR 2.30; 90% CI 1.36, 3.88, p=0.007) compared to 13.1 vs. 7.4 mths (HR=0.61; 90% CI 0.28, 1.36, p=0.308) in 28 pts without Bev pretreatment. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the known safety profiles. Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs affected the gastrointestinal tract (diarrhea, mucositis/stomatitis, nausea); other frequent severe AEs included neutropenia and leukopenia, fatigue, fever, sensory neuropathy, and thrombosis. Conclusions: No unexpected safety concerns occurred during the course of the study. S did not lead to improved PFS. There was a detrimental effect of S on OS in patients with Bev pretreatment. Clinical trial information: 2008-000803-26.
Phase Ib dose-escalation study of Pexa-Vec (pexastimogene devacirepvec; JX-594), an oncolytic and immunotherapeutic vaccinia virus, administered by intravenous (IV) infusions in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC).
Authors: Lee Jeeyun , Park Young Suk , Burke James , Lim Ho Yeong , Lee Jihye , Kang Won Ki , Park Joon Oh , Pelusio Adina , Breitbach Caroline , Kirn David H. 
Published: March 2020

3608^ Background: Pexa-Vec is an EGFR-targeted vaccinia virus engineered to express granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), thereby stimulating direct oncolysis, tumor vascular disruption and anti-tumor immunity (Nat Rev Cancer 2009). Dose-dependent IV Pexa-Vec delivery was defined previously (Nature2011). This study was designed to assess the safety, maximal tolerated dose and anti-tumor activity of Pexa-Vec administered IV in patients with mCRC after failure of standard therapies. Methods: Nine patients were treated at 1 of 3 dose levels (106, 107 or 3x107pfu/kg IV every 2 weeks x 4) in a standard 3+3 dose-escalation design; 6 additional patients were enrolled at the MFD. Anti-tumor activity according to RECIST was determined using serial CT scans. Pharmacokinetic studies were also performed. Data summarized prior to database lock. Results: 15 patients with mCRC refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU were treated (median lines of therapy 5; range 2-7); 13 of 15 received prior anti-angiogenic agents, and 11 of 12 KRAS WT tumors failed cetuximab. Adverse events were generally grade 1/2 and included: fever (93%), chills (93%), headache (60%), nausea (60%), and hypotension (40%). No dose-limiting toxicities or grade 3/4 events were reported. Only patients treated at high-dose (Cohort 3 & Expansion) exhibited a pustular rash (n=9; 78%). Pexa-Vec genomes detected in blood acutely were above the dose threshold for systemic delivery. Notably, clearance was not more rapid with repeated IV treatments despite the induction of humoral immunity. Furthermore, patients at the top dose level exhibited increased disease stabilization at Week 4 (89% high-dose (n= 9) versus 33% low-dose (n=6)). A trend (p=0.16) towards increased overall survival at high vs low-dose Pexa-Vec was observed with 78% high-dose patients still alive between 5 and 13 mos. Conclusions: Repeat IV Pexa-Vec was well-tolerated with transient flu-like symptoms. Dose-dependent safety, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor activity were described in treatment-refractory mCRC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01380600.
Second-line chemotherapy (CT) with or without bevacizumab (BV) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) who progressed to a first-line treatment containing BV: Updated results of the phase III “BEBYP” trial by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO).
Authors: Masi Gianluca , Loupakis Fotios , Salvatore Lisa , Cremolini Chiara , Fornaro Lorenzo , Schirripa Marta , Granetto Cristina , Miraglio Emanuela , Di Costanzo Francesco , Antonuzzo Lorenzo , Marcucci Lorenzo , Barbara Cecilia , Boni Corrado , Banzi Maria , Chiara Silvana , Garbarino Daniela , Valsuani Chiara , Bonetti Andrea , Boni Luca , Falcone Alfredo 
Published: March 2020

3615 Background: Retrospective data suggested that the continuation of BV with second-line CT beyond progression (PD) in pts who received BV in first-line can improve the outcome. Recently, results of the AIO/AMG ML18147 study demonstrated an improved overall survival (OS) by continuing BV beyond PD. Methods: This phase III study randomized pts with measurable mCRC treated in first-line with BV plus fluoropyrimidine, FOLFIRI, FOLFOX or FOLFOXIRI, to receive in second-line mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI (depending on first-line CT) with or without BV. The primary end-point was progression free survival (PFS).To detect a HR for PFS of 0.70 with an α and β error of 0.05 and 0.20 respectively, the study required 249 events. Assuming an accrual time of 24 months (mos) and a follow up of 12 mos we planned to randomize 262 pts. Results: Considering the results of the AIO/AMG ML18147 trial, the study accrual was stopped prematurely. A total of 185 pts were randomized and 184 pts were included in the ITT analysis (1 pt randomized in error). Pts characteristics were (arm A/arm B): number 92/92, gender M75%-F25%/M57%-F43%, median age 66 (38-75)/62 (38-75) years, PS=0 82%/82%, multiple site of disease 76%/77%. At a median follow up of 18 mos the study met its primary endpoint by improving PFS in the BV arm. We updated results and at a median follow up of 22 mos the improvement in PFS for the experimental arm was confirmed with a median PFS of 5.2 mos for arm A and 6.7 mos for arm B (HR=0.66; 95% CI 0.49–0.90; unstratified p=0.0072). Subgroup analyses showed a consistent benefit in all subgroups including gender (F: HR=0.63; M: HR=0.72) and first-line PFS (≤10 mos: HR=0.57; >10 mos: HR=0.71). Response rates (RECIST) were 18% and 21% (p=0.71). Toxicity profile was consistent with previously reported data. The OS data are still immature, with 56 events in arm A and 54 in arm B and the median OS is 16.0 mos and 16.5 mos respectively (HR=0.83; 95% CI 0.57-1.22; unstratified p=0.34). Conclusions: This study demonstrates an improvement in PFS by continuing BV in second-line in pts who had received CT+BV in first-line. Clinical trial information: NCT00720512.
Phase I dose escalation of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) resminostat in combination with FOLFIRI in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients: The SHORE trial.
Authors: Schulze-Bergkamen Henning , Jaeger Dirk , Kopp Hans-Georg , Mayer Frank , Bitzer Michael , Mais Anna , Resemann Karin , Hauns Bernhard , Asche Julia , Henning Stefan W. , Hentsch Bernd 
Published: March 2020

3625 Background: Resminostat is a novel oral HDAC inhibitor with broad activity in various cancer models. In CRC models, resminostat revealed synergistic effects with 5-FU and irinotecan/SN-38, indicating its (re-)sensitization potential when applied in combination therapy. Furthermore, resminostat downregulates thymidylate synthase, involved in drug resistance to 5-FU and effectively inhibits HDAC2, one of the target enzymes believed to critically support development of CRC. The phase I/II SHORE trial investigates resminostat in combination with FOLFIRI in patients previously treated with 5-FU. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced CRC having previously received 5-FU alone or in combination with other agents who were scheduled for FOLFIRI in second or later treatment lines were included. The phase I comprised an open-label, inter-patient, ‘3+3’ dose escalation design with increasing doses of resminostat combined with standard FOLFIRI. Pts received resminostat on 5 consecutive days, followed by a 9-day drug free period (‘5+9’ scheme, i.e. 14-day cycles). On days 3 and 4 of each cycle (C), FOLFIRI was administered. Primary objective of the Phase I part was to determine safety and tolerability, the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of the combination. Results: 17 pts (median age 61 yrs; 12 males; 11 ECOG 0; 6 ECOG 1; median therapy line 2 [2-6]) were enrolled in 4 dose levels of resminostat 200, 400, 600 mg QD (3 pts each) and 400 mg BID (6 pts) plus FOLFIRI. Two pts discontinued in C1 and were replaced. No DLT occurred. AEs consisted mainly of GI symptoms of mild and moderate intensity (nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) leading to decreased electrolyte plasma levels in some pts. In the highest dose level tested (400 mg BID) hematological toxicity, mainly neutropenia up to grade 4, was observed leading to dose reductions in 3 pts in C3 and C7. No objective responses were reported, however some pts showed SD for prolonged time (up to 32 w). Results of the completed phase I part will be reported. Conclusions: The combination of resminostat with standard FOLFIRI was safe and well tolerated warranting continuation into the Phase II part of the study. Clinical trial information: NCT01277406.
Time profile of adverse events (AEs) from regorafenib (REG) treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the phase III CORRECT study.
Authors: Grothey Axel , Sobrero Alberto F. , Siena Salvatore , Falcone Alfredo , Ychou Marc , Humblet Yves , Bouche Olivier , Mineur Laurent , Barone Carlo , Adenis Antoine , Argiles Guillem , Yoshino Takayuki , Lenz Heinz-Josef , Goldberg Richard M. , Sargent Daniel J. , Cihon Frank , Wagner Andrea , Cupit Lisa , Laurent Dirk , Van Cutsem Eric 
Published: March 2020

3637 Background: In the CORRECT phase III trial, the multikinase inhibitor REG demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival vs placebo (P) in patients with mCRC whose disease had progressed on other standard therapies. The most frequent grade 3 AEs were hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR), fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, and rash. We examined when these AEs first occurred and what impact they had on REG dosing. Methods: Adults with mCRC progressing after all standard therapies were randomized to receive REG 160 mg (n=505) or P (n=255) orally once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. AEs were managed with dose modifications (reduction and interruption) according to the protocol. Results: The safety population comprised 753 pts (REG n=500, P n=253). The mean ± SD treatment duration was 12.1 ± 9.7 weeks for REG and 7.8 ± 5.2 weeks for P. Treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 99.6% of REG pts and 96.8% of P pts. AEs occurring in ≥10% more REG than P pts were fatigue, HFSR, anorexia, diarrhea, weight loss, voice changes, hypertension, rash/desquamation, oral mucositis, fever, hyperbilirubinemia, and low platelet count. The incidence of grade ≥3 HFSR, fatigue, hypertension, and rash/desquamation typically peaked in cycle 1 and tapered to a relatively stable lower incidence over later cycles, while the incidence of diarrhea remained relatively constant throughout the study; median time to first occurrence and worst grade of these AEs is shown in the table. AEs led to dose modifications in 66.6% of REG pts and 22.5% of P pts. Conclusions: The most common AEs in the REG group typically occurred early during treatment. Close early monitoring of AEs and proper management by dose modification is recommended. Clinical trial information: NCT01103323. [Table: see text]
Dual MEK/EGFR inhibition for advanced, chemotherapy-refractory pancreatic cancer: A multicenter phase II trial of selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) plus erlotinib.
Authors: Ko Andrew H. , Tempero Margaret A. , Bekaii-Saab Tanios B. , Kuhn Peter , Courtin Ryan , Ziyeh Sharvina , Tahiri Sanaa , Kelley Robin Katie , Dito Elizabeth , Ong Anna , Linetskaya Regina , Mirzoeva Olga K. , Wu Christina Sing-Ying , Venook Alan Paul , Korn Wolfgang Michael 
Published: March 2020

4014 Background: Pharmacologic inhibition of MEK leads to enhanced signaling through EGFR with hyperactivation of a parallel oncogenic pathway (PI3K) independent of mutant KRAS, supporting a therapeutic strategy of combined target inhibition in PDAC to overcome this negative feedback loop. Based on preclinical evidence of synergistic activity between EGFR and MEK inhibitors, we conducted a non-randomized phase II trial of erlotinib plus selumetinib, a selective, allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/2, in patients with PDAC who had received one prior line of chemotherapy. Methods: A Simon 2-stage design was used, with planned n = 46. Study treatment consisted of erlotinib 100 mg + selumetinib 100 mg daily in 3-week cycles, with CT evaluation every 2 cycles. 1o objective was overall survival (OS). Correlative studies include detection of circulating tumor cells using a novel nonenrichment high definition immunofluorescence assay, and tissue- and serum proteomic-based predictive biomarkers. Results: 46 patients enrolled at 2 sites between 1/2011 and 1/2013 (median age 67 y.o. [range 40-84]; ECOG PS (0/1): 31/15; prior gemcitabine-based vs. FOLFIRINOX vs. other 1st-line chemo: 34/10/2). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range, 1-7). Of 41 evaluable patients to date, disease control rate is 51% (0 PR; 21 with stable disease (SD) > 6 weeks, 10 with SD > 12 weeks; 11 minor responses). 9/31 patients (29%) had CA19-9 decline > 50%. Estimated median PFS and OS by Kaplan-Meier are 2.6 and 7.5 months, respectively, with 21 patients still alive. Grade 3/4 AEs likely attributable to study treatment include rash (10 patients), hypertension (6), anemia (5), diarrhea (4), and nausea/vomiting (4); no study-related deaths have occurred. 38% of patients have required dose reduction of one/both agents. Conclusions: Dual targeting of MEK/EGFR signaling shows antitumor activity in PDAC in a subset of patients and warrants further exploration, possibly in combination with, or comparison to, cytotoxic therapy. Companion efforts are ongoing to assess candidate predictive markers of benefit to this combination. Supported by CTEP and NIH R21 CA149939. Clinical trial information: NCT01222689.
Cougar-02: A randomized phase III study of docetaxel versus active symptom control in patients with relapsed esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Cook Natalie , Marshall Andrea , Blazeby Jane M. , Bridgewater John A. , Wadsley Jonathan , Coxon Fareeda Y. , Mansoor Wasat , Madhusudan Srinivasan , Falk Stephen , Middleton Gary William , Swinson Daniel , Chau Ian , Thompson Joyce , Cunningham David , Kareclas Paula , Dunn Janet A. , Ford Hugo 
Published: March 2020

4023 Background: Survival in patients who relapse after first-line chemotherapy (CT) for advanced esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma (EGC) is poor though recently randomised trials (RCT) have suggested a small benefit for second line chemotherapy with taxanes or irinotecan. There is very little data on health related quality of life (HRQL) or overall survival (OS), particularly in patients who progress shortly after first-line therapy. Methods: COUGAR-02 was a multicentre open-label, phase III RCT for patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGC of performance status (PS) 0-2 who had progressed within 6 months of previous platinum/fluoropyrimidine CT. Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive either docetaxel 75mg/m2every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles or active symptom control (ASC). The primary endpoint was OS. The secondary endpoint of HRQL, assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-ST022, was analysed using standardised area under a curve and compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Sensitivity analysis adjusting for dropouts due to death were performed using quality adjusted survival. Results: 168 patients (84 patients in each arm) were recruited between April 2008 and April 2012. Median age was 65 years (range 28-84); 81% were males. PS at randomisation was 0 for 27%, 1 for 57% and 2 for 15%. 86% had metastatic disease. 43% progressed during previous CT, 28% progressed within 3 months of end of previous CT and 29% progressed between 3 and 6 months. Median number of cycles of docetaxel was 3. 23% completed 6 cycles. Docetaxel was well tolerated and resulted in a significantly improved OS over ASC alone (HR=0.67 (95% CI 0.49-0.92); p=0.01). Objective response rate was 7%. For QLQ-C30, patients on docetaxel arm reported significantly less pain (p=0.0008) and trend for less nausea and vomiting (p=0.02) and constipation (p=0.02) than those on ASC arm. Similar global HRQL seen (p=0.53).For QLQ-ST022, trend seen for less dysphagia (p=0.02) and pain symptoms (p=0.01) for patients on docetaxel arm than ASC Conclusions: Docetaxel provided a significant OS benefit over ASC with improvements in symptom scores and no loss in overall HRQL. Docetaxel can be considered a standard of care in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00978549.
Multicenter phase II trial of temsirolimus (TEM) and bevacizumab (BEV) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET).
Authors: Hobday Timothy J. , Qin Rui , Moore Malcolm J. , Reidy Diane Lauren , Strosberg Jonathan R. , Kindler Hedy Lee , Shah Manisha H. , Lenz Heinz-Josef , Kaubisch Andreas , Chen Helen X. , Erlichman Charles 
Published: March 2020

4032 Background: PNET has long had few effective therapies other than chemotherapy. Placebo-controlled phase III trials of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the VEGF/PDGF receptor inhibitor sunitinib noted improved progression-free survival (PFS). However, objective response rates (RR) with these agents are still <10%. Preclinical studies suggest enhanced anti-tumor effects with combined mTOR and VEGF targeted therapy. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial of the mTOR inhibitor TEM (25 mg IV q week) and the VEGF-A monoclonal antibody BEV (10 mg/kg IV q 2 weeks) in patients (pts) with well or moderately differentiated PNET and progressive disease by RECIST within 7 months of study entry. Co primary endpoints were RR and 6-month PFS. Planned enrollment was 50 patients, with interim analysis for futility after the first 25 evaluable pts. Pts had no prior mTOR or VEGF targeted agents, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematologic and organ function. Continued octreotide was allowed, but not required. Prior interferon, embolization, and ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens were allowed. Results: 55 pts were eligible for response assessment. Confirmed PR was documented in 20 of 55 patients (37%). 44 of 55 (80%) patients were progression-free at 6 months. Of 49 pts evaluable for this endpoint, 12 month PFS is 49%. 15 patients remain on therapy. For evaluable patients, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to therapy were hypertension (18%), hyperglycemia (13%), fatigue (11%). leukopenia (9%), headache (9%), proteinuria (7%), and hypokalemia (7%). Conclusions: The combination of TEM/BEV has substantial activity in a multi-center phase II trial with RR of 37%, well in excess of single targeted agents in PNET. 6-month PFS was a notable 80% in a population of patients with RECIST criteria progression within 7 months of study entry. Phase III trials of combined VEGF/mTOR inhibition in PNET should be pursued. Clinical trial information: NCT01010126.
Genetic, tissue, and plasma biomarkers of outcomes from a prospective study of neoadjuvant short course proton-based chemoradiation for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Authors: Hong Theodore S. , Deshpande Vikram , Ancukiewicz Marek , Yeap Beow Y. , Borger Darrell R. , Wo Jennifer Yon-Li , Boucher Yves , Kwak Eunice Lee , Clark Jeffrey W. , Zhu Andrew X. , Blaszkowsky Lawrence Scott , Mamon Harvey J. , Jain Rakesh K. , Ryan David P. , DeLaney Thomas F. , Fernandez-del Castillo Carlos , Duda Dan G. 
Published: March 2020

4047 Background: The prognosis of resectable PDAC reflects a complex interaction between genotype, growth factor levels, and tumor microenvironment. We performed genetic, plasma, and tissue-based biomarker analysis for a phase I/II study of neoadjuvant short course proton-based chemoradiation. Methods: Patients with radiographically resectable PDAC were treated on an IRB approved, phase I/II trial of neoadjuvant short course-proton-based chemoradiation. Genotyping included KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, TP53, and PIK3CA. Tissue-based IHC on resection specimens included DPC4, CXCR4, CXCR7, and SDF1a in the central and peripheral regions of PDAC. The trial was amended to evaluate plasma biomarkers, drawn before and after chemoradiation, including HGF, VEGF, sVEGFR2, SDF1α, bFGF, PlGF, TNF-α, CAIX, sFLT1, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β. Correlation with OS was evaluated by the Wald test in a univariable Cox regression using log-transformed covariates. Results: Surgical specimens from all 38 patients who underwent resection and serial plasma samples from the last 12 patients enrolled were analyzed. Disease-specific results were previously reported (ASCO 2012, abs 4021). DPC4 intact (37% of evaluated patients) was associated with oligometastatic disease (p<0.05) but not OS. KRAS mutation 31/38 patients (82%), did not affect OS (HR=1.57, p=0.88) , but the specific KRAS G12D mutation (14/38, 37%) had a worse OS (HR=2.44, p<0.05). SDF1α and CXCR7 expression was higher and CXCR4 expression was lower in the tumor center versus periphery. Higher CXCR7 expression in the periphery was associated with poor OS (HR=2.29, p<0.05). High baseline plasma HGF was associated with a worse OS (HR=6.60, p<0.05), with a trend for association between high post-treatment plasma HGF and poor OS (HR=9.28, p=0.08). No other biomarker evaluated was significantly associated with OS. Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, KRAS G12D status, CXCR7 expression, and plasma HGF level were associated with worse OS. DPC4 status correlated with oligometastatic disease. Additional IHC evaluations, including c-MET expression, are ongoing and will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT00438256.