bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Surgical outcomes of centripetal non-fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis with and without foveal detachment: a follow-up of at least 3 years
Authors: Peng Kai-Ling , Kung Ya-Hsin , Hsu Chia-Ming , Chang Shu-Ping , Tseng Pei-Lin , Wu Tsung-Tien 
Published: December 2019

Background
We evaluated the surgical outcomes of vitrectomy with non-fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for myopic foveoschisis with a follow-up of at least 3 years.

Methods
In this retrospective study, 32 consecutive eyes with high myopia with or without foveal detachment underwent vitrectomy and centripetal, non-fovea-sparing ILM peeling with gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis. Outcome measures were visual acuity (VA) and optical coherence tomography findings.

Results
Mean axial length was 29.39±1.92 mm; mean follow-up was 42.66 (±8.29) months. Foveoschisis and foveal detachment completely resolved in all eyes postoperatively. Mean central foveal thickness (CFT) improved significantly from 631.88±191.72 to 232.65±69.67 µm, and mean best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 0.90 (Snellen equivalent (SE), 20/160)±0.43 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to 0.43 (SE, 20/54)±0.29 logMAR (both p<0.001; two-tailed, paired t-test). Eyes with foveal detachment (n=10) at baseline had thicker preoperative CFT (737.8±239.83 vs 583.73±147.78 µm; p=0.033) but thinner postoperative CFT (188.20±31.52 vs 252.86±73.29 µm; p=0.012). Eyes without foveal detachment at baseline had significantly better postoperative VA (0.33 (SE, 20/43)±0.18 vs 0.65 (SE, 20/86)±0.37 logMAR; p=0.002). No macular hole or other complications occurred during follow-up.

Conclusion
Centripetal, non-fovea-sparing ILM peeling with gas tamponade may achieve myopic foveoschisis resolution and vision improvement without macular hole formation during at least 3-year follow-up.
Effect of non-invasive intranasal neurostimulation on tear volume, dryness and ocular pain
Authors: Farhangi Monika , Cheng Anny Mansim , Baksh Brandon , Sarantopoulos Constantine D , Felix Elizabeth R , Levitt Roy C , Galor Anat 
Published: December 2019

Purpose
To evaluate the effect of one TrueTear session on change in tear volume and symptoms of dryness and ocular pain.

Methods
Retrospective interventional case series of patients seen in a dry eye clinic. Seventy-five individuals underwent an ocular surface examination and one session of neurostimulation. Outcome measures included objective change in tear volume measured via phenol red test, and subjective change in sensations of dryness and ocular pain measured on a 0–10 Numerical Rating Scale.

Results

The mean age of the 75 individuals was 59±13 years, and the majority were male (73%). Intranasal neurostimulation increased tear volume (mean 13.40±8.00 mm, p<0.0005) and reduced intensities of dryness (mean −2.85±2.79, p<0.0005) and ocular pain (mean −1.48±2.41, p<0.0005 for both). However, these effects were independent of one another as change in symptom report did not correlate with change in tear volume (r=−0.13, p=0.25 for dryness; r=0.07, p=0.56 for pain). In a multivariable model, the strongest predictors for increased tear volume were lower baseline tear volume (standardised beta (β)=−0.50, p<0.0005) and absence of an autoimmune disease (β=−0.36, p=0.001) (R
2
=0.30). The strongest predictors for reduced dryness and pain scores were lower baseline dryness and ocular pain scores. No complications related to neurostimulation were noted.

Conclusion
Intranasal neurostimulation increased tear volume and reduced intensities of dryness and ocular pain, independently of one another.
Key factors for overcoming psychological insulin resistance: an examination of patient perspectives through content analysis
Authors: Stuckey Heather , Fisher Lawrence , Polonsky William H , Hessler Danielle , Snoek Frank J , Tang Tricia S , Hermanns Norbert , Mundet-Tuduri Xavier , da Silva Maria Elizabeth Rossi , Sturt Jackie , Okazaki Kentaro , Cao Dachuang , Hadjiyianni Irene , Ivanova Jasmina I , Desai Urvi , Perez-Nieves Magaly 
Published: December 2019

ObjectiveTo understand participant perceptions about insulin and identify key behaviors of healthcare professionals (HCPs) that motivated initially reluctant adults from seven countries (n=40) who had type 2 diabetes (T2D) to start insulin treatment.Research design and methodsTelephone interviews were conducted with a subset of participants from an international investigation of adults with T2D who were reluctant to start insulin (EMOTION). Questions related to: (a) participants’ thoughts about insulin before and after initiation; (b) reasons behind responses on the survey that were either ‘not helpful at all’ or ‘helped a lot’; (c) actions their HCP may have taken to help start insulin treatment; and (d) advice they would give to others in a similar situation of starting insulin. Responses were coded by two independent reviewers (kappa 0.992).ResultsStarting insulin treatment was perceived as a negative experience that would be painful and would lead down a ‘slippery slope’ to complications. HCPs engaged in four primary behaviors that helped with insulin acceptance: (1) showed the insulin pen/needle and demonstrated the injection process; (2) explained how insulin could help with diabetes control and reduce risk of complications; (3) used collaborative communication style; and (4) offered support and willingness to answer questions so that participants would not be ‘on their own’. Following initiation, most participants noted that insulin was not ‘as bad as they thought’ and recommended insulin to other adults with T2D.ConclusionsBased on these themes, two actionable strategies are suggested for HCPs to help people with psychological insulin resistance: (1) demonstrate the injection process and discuss negative perceptions of insulin as well as potential benefits; (2) offer autonomy in a person-centred collaborative approach, but provide support and accessibility to address concerns. These findings help HCPs to better understand ways in which they can engage reluctant people with T2D with specific strategies.
Current state of science in machine learning methods for automatic infant pain evaluation using facial expression information: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Cheng Dan , Liu Dianbo , Philpotts Lisa Liang , Turner Dana P , Houle Timothy T , Chen Lucy , Zhang Miaomiao , Yang Jianjun , Zhang Wei , Deng Hao 
Published: December 2019

IntroductionInfants can experience pain similar to adults, and improperly controlled pain stimuli could have a long-term adverse impact on their cognitive and neurological function development. The biggest challenge of achieving good infant pain control is obtaining objective pain assessment when direct communication is lacking. For years, computer scientists have developed many different facial expression-centred machine learning (ML) methods for automatic infant pain assessment. Many of these ML algorithms showed rather satisfactory performance and have demonstrated good potential to be further enhanced for implementation in real-world clinical settings. To date, there is no prior research that has systematically summarised and compared the performance of these ML algorithms. Our proposed meta-analysis will provide the first comprehensive evidence on this topic to guide further ML algorithm development and clinical implementation.Methods and analysisWe will search four major public electronic medical and computer science databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and IEEE Xplore Digital Library from January 2008 to present. All the articles will be imported into the Covidence platform for study eligibility screening and inclusion. Study-level extracted data will be stored in the Systematic Review Data Repository online platform. The primary outcome will be the prediction accuracy of the ML model. The secondary outcomes will be model utility measures including generalisability, interpretability and computational efficiency. All extracted outcome data will be imported into RevMan V.5.2.1 software and R V3.3.2 for analysis. Risk of bias will be summarised using the latest Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review and meta-analysis will only use study-level data from public databases, thus formal ethical approval is not required. The results will be disseminated in the form of an official publication in a peer-reviewed journal and/or presentation at relevant conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019118784.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognosis and prognostic factors of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features
Authors: Kamiya Hiroyuki , Panlaqui Ogee Mer 
Published: December 2019

ObjectiveTo clarify the prognosis and prognostic factors of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) in comparison to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the most common idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial pneumonia (CTD-IP).DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesElectronic databases such as Medline and Embase were searched from 2015 through 6 September 2019.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesPrimary studies that comparatively investigated the prognosis or prognostic factors of IPAF were eligible.Data extraction and analysisTwo reviewers extracted relevant data and assessed the risk of bias independently. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. The quality of presented evidence was assessed by the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.ResultsOut of a total of 656 records retrieved, 12 studies were reviewed. The clinical features of IPAF were diverse between studies, which included a radiological and/or pathological usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern of between 0% and 73.8%. All studies contained some risk of bias. There was no significant difference of all-cause mortality between IPAF-UIP and IPF in all studies, although the prognosis of IPAF in contrast to IPF or CTD-IP varied between studies depending on the proportion of UIP pattern. Among the potential prognostic factors identified, age was significantly associated with all-cause mortality of IPAF by a pooled analysis of univariate results with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.07). The adjusted effect of age was also significant in all studies. The quality of presented evidence was deemed as very low.ConclusionThere was no significant difference of all-cause mortality between IPAF-UIP and IPF. Age was deemed as a prognostic factor for all-cause mortality of IPAF. The findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the low quality of the presented evidence.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018115870.
Assessing the performance of the Asian/Pacific islander identification algorithm to infer Hmong ethnicity from electronic health records in California
Authors: Ly May Ying N , Kim Katherine K , Stewart Susan L 
Published: December 2019

ObjectiveThis study assesses the performance of the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Asian/Pacific Islander Identification Algorithm (NAPIIA) to infer Hmong ethnicity.Design and settingAnalyses of electronic health records (EHRs) from 1 January 2011 to 1 October 2015. The NAPIIA was applied to the EHR data, and self-reported Hmong ethnicity from a questionnaire was used as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated comparing the source data ethnicity inferred by the algorithm with the self-reported ethnicity from the questionnaire.ParticipantsEHRs indicating Hmong, Chinese, Vietnamese and Korean ethnicity who met the original study inclusion criteria were analysed.ResultsThe NAPIIA had a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 99.9%, a PPV of 96% and an NPV of 99%. The prevalence of Hmong population in the sample was 3.9%.ConclusionThe high sensitivity of the NAPIIA indicates its effectiveness in detecting Hmong ethnicity. The applicability of the NAPIIA to a multitude of Asian subgroups can advance Asian health disparity research by enabling researchers to disaggregate Asian data and unmask health challenges of different Asian subgroups.
Safety and efficacy of perioperative benzodiazepine administration: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Spence Jessica , Young Jack , Alhazzani Waleed , Whitlock Richard , D'Aragon Frédérick , Um Kevin , Mazer David , Beaver Chris , Jacobsohn Eric , Belley-Cote Emilie 
Published: December 2019

IntroductionPerioperative benzodiazepines are used because of their anxiolytic, sedative and amnestic effects. Evidence has demonstrated an association of benzodiazepines with adverse neuropsychiatric effects. Nonetheless, because of their potential benefits, perioperative benzodiazepines continue to be used routinely. We seek to evaluate the body of evidence of the risks and benefits of benzodiazepine use during the perioperative period.Methods and analysisWe will search Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science from inception to March 2019 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating the administration of benzodiazepine medications as compared with all other medications (or nothing) in patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. We will exclude studies assessing the use of benzodiazepines for procedural sedation or day surgery. We will examine the impact of giving these medications before, during and after surgery. Outcomes of interest include the incidence of delirium, duration of delirium, postprocedure cognitive change, the incidence of intraoperative awareness, patient satisfaction/quality of life/quality of recovery, length-of-stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU), hospital LOS and in-hospital mortality.Reviewers will screen references and assess eligibility using predefined criteria independently and in duplicate. Two reviewers will independently collect data using prepiloted forms. We will present results separately for RCTs and observational studies. We will pool data using a random effect model and present results as relative risk with 95% CIs for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. We will pool adjusted ORs for observational studies. We will assess risk of bias for individual studies using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for RCTs. For observational studies, we will use tools designed by the Clinical Advances through Research and Information Translation group. Quality of evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review involves no patient contact and no interaction with healthcare providers or systems. As such, we did not seek ethics board approval. We will disseminate the findings of our systematic review through the presentation at peer-reviewed conferences and by seeking publication in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019128144
Quality evaluation of community pharmacy blood pressure (BP) screening services: an English cross-sectional survey with geospatial analysis
Authors: Barrett Ravina , Hodgkinson James 
Published: December 2019

ObjectivesThe primary objective was to assess the accuracy (calibration and validation status) of digital blood pressure (BP) monitors used within community pharmacy in England and the secondary objectives were to assess the overall quality of the BP service by assessing service prevalence, service utilisation and other in-service considerations.DesignA cross-sectional survey.SettingPrimary-care retail-pharmacies.Participants500 pharmacies that contribute to government dispensing-data were invited by post to complete the survey. Private contractors were excluded.InterventionsWe conducted a questionnaire survey with a follow-up (September 2018 to December 2018).Results109 responses were received. 61% (n=66) of responding pharmacies provided a free BP check to their patients. 40 (61%) pharmacies used recommended validated clinical metres, 6 (9%) had failed validation and 20 (30%) provided too little information to enable us to determine their monitor’s status.ConclusionsResponding pharmacies were able to provide useful BP monitoring services to their patients, though quality enhancements need to be implemented. Majority of pharmacies use validated BP monitors, however, there was a lack of range of cuff sizes, variation in replacement and calibration of monitors and apparent absence of such practice in a minority of pharmacies alongside variation in training standards. We noted higher frequency of BP screening in the most deprived postcodes.We recommend in-service redesign and delivery improvements, and suggest professional bodies and researchers work together to create clearer frameworks for front-line practitioners, creating appropriate incentives to facilitate this service redesign.Funders and policy setters should consider the value added to the National Health Service and other healthcare agencies of such screening by pharmacy providers both nationally and internationally. It has the potential to reduce complications of undiagnosed hypertension and the medicines burden that it creates. Future work should examine the impact of pharmacist-led BP screening on patients.
Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
Authors: Teufer Birgit , Ebenberger Agnes , Affengruber Lisa , Kien Christina , Klerings Irma , Szelag Monika , Grillich Ludwig , Griebler Ursula 
Published: December 2019

ObjectivesOccupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS.MethodsWe conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool.ResultsWe screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions.DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018100341
Acute kidney injury electronic alerts: mixed methods Normalisation Process Theory evaluation of their implementation into secondary care in England
Authors: Scott Jason , Finch Tracy , Bevan Mark , Maniatopoulos Gregory , Gibbins Chris , Yates Bryan , Kilimangalam Narayanan , Sheerin Neil , Kanagasundaram Nigel Suren 
Published: December 2019

ObjectiveAround one in five emergency hospital admissions are affected by acute kidney injury (AKI). To address poor quality of care in relation to AKI, electronic alerts (e-alerts) are mandated across primary and secondary care in England and Wales. Evidence of the benefit of AKI e-alerts remains conflicting, with at least some uncertainty explained by poor or unclear implementation. The objective of this study was to identify factors relating to implementation, using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), which promote or inhibit use of AKI e-alerts in secondary care.DesignMixed methods combining qualitative (observations, semi-structured interviews) and quantitative (survey) methods.Setting and participantsThree secondary care hospitals in North East England, representing two distinct AKI e-alerting systems. Observations (>44 hours) were conducted in Emergency Assessment Units (EAUs). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians (n=29) from EAUs, vascular or general surgery or care of the elderly. Qualitative data were supplemented by Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) surveys (n=101).AnalysisQualitative data were analysed using the NPT framework, with quantitative data analysed descriptively and using χ2 and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for differences in current and future normalisation.ResultsParticipants reported familiarity with the AKI e-alerts but that the e-alerts would become more normalised in the future (p<0.001). No single NPT mechanism led to current (un)successful implementation of the e-alerts, but analysis of the underlying subconstructs identified several mechanisms indicative of successful normalisation (internalisation, legitimation) or unsuccessful normalisation (initiation, differentiation, skill set workability, systematisation).ConclusionsClinicians recognised the value and importance of AKI e-alerts in their practice, although this was not sufficient for the e-alerts to be routinely engaged with by clinicians. To further normalise the use of AKI e-alerts, there is a need for tailored training on use of the e-alerts and routine feedback to clinicians on the impact that e-alerts have on patient outcomes.