bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Phase II study of durvalumab plus total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer: The GEMCAD-1703 DUREC trial.
Authors: Capdevila Jaume , Macias Declara Ismael , Riesco Martinez Maria Carmen , Maurel Joan , Hernando Jorge , Alonso Vicente , Suárez Begoña Graña , Gallego Plazas Javier , Losa Ferran , Vera Ruth , Melian Marcos , Navalpotro Begona , Acosta Daniel , Diez Marc , Garcia-Alvarez Alejandro , Garcia-Albeniz Xabier , Fernandez-Martos Carlos 
Published: May 2020

TPS4122 Background: In clinical stages II and III (cT3-4 and/or N+), preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or short-course radiation followed by total mesorectal escision (TME) have been the standard of care for the last 15 years. Induction chemotherapy (CT) before CRT (strategy known as TNT) results in fewer toxic effects and improved compliance. TNT may release tumor-neoantigens with platinum-based induction CT, and radiotherapy has the potential ability to induce an immunogenic cell death and counteract an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment that provides the rationale for combining with immunotherapies. In addition, the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes has been demonstrated in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant CRT, reinforcing the rational for immune check-point inhibitors in this setting. We hypothesize that combining TNT with durvalumab (an optimized monoclonal antibody directed against programmed cell death-1 ligand 1) would improve outcome. Methods: DUREC is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase Ib/II study for patients with magnetic resonance (mr) image middle or distal third, mrT3c-d/T4/N2 rectal adenocarcinoma. Treatment: Patients will receive 6 cycles of modified FOLFOX6 prior to CRT (capecitabine with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) and TME, combined with durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks during induction CT, CRT and waiting period until surgery. To assess the tolerability and toxicity profile we plan to perform a run-in treatment phase including the first 6 patients in the study, holding recruitment until all of them will be operated and 30-days post-surgery period completed. If ≤ 2 durvalumab-related dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are observed, recruitment will continue. The primary objective is pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints include toxicity, tumor regression grade, R0 resections, clear circumferential margins, surgical complications, NAR score, disease-free survival and a biomarker program on tumor tissue, blood samples and stool microbiota. Statistical design: 58 evaluable patients (assuming a P0 of 16% and a P1 of 30%, with 0.1 alpha and 0.1 beta); Study started recruitment on December 2019. Clinical trial information: 2018-004835-56 .
Randomized phase III trial to evaluate omentum preserving gastrectomy for patients with resectable advanced gastric cancer: JCOG1711 (ROAD-GC).
Authors: Yamada Takanobu , Yoshikawa Takaki , Sato Yuya , Machida Ryunosuke , Mizusawa Junki , Katayama Hiroshi , Tokunaga Masanori , Nishida Yasunori , Hihara Jun , Watanabe Masaya , Choda Yasuhiro , Nunobe Souya , Fujita Junya , Kaji Masahide , Fukushima Norimasa , Ito Seiji , Boku Narikazu , Terashima Masanori 
Published: May 2020

TPS4646 Background: Standard surgery for resectable advanced gastric cancer is D2 (standardized extended lymph node dissection) gastrectomy with omentectomy. The reason why omentectomy has been performed is as follows; (1) principal surgery for gastrointestinal cancers is en-block resection of mesothelium including regional lymph nodes. Omentum is a part of the mesothelium of the stomach. (2) Cancer cells implanted into the peritoneal cavity aggregated in the milky-spot of the omentum and formed peritoneal dissemination in an animal model. (3) By special staining, micrometastasis detected in the omentum. There is some arguments for this theory. (1) no prospective study showed survival benefit of omentectomy as compared with omentum preservation. (2) anatomically, milky-spot is found not only in the omentum but also in other mesothelium or Douglas pouch. (3) JCOG1001 phase III study showed no survival benefit of bursectomy against non-bursectomy although bursa is a part of mesothelium of the stomach. (4) Anti-immunity is accelerated by antigen presentation by macrophage in the milky-spot of the omentum. Preservation of the omentum may have several benefits; (1) decrease in blood loss and operation time, (2) preservation of physical function by omentum such as reaction to peritonitis and prevention of adhesion, and (3) overcoming difficulties in laparoscopic omentectomy and avoidance of organ injury during surgery. Methods: The study is multicenter randomized phase III trial designed to confirm non-inferiority of omentum preservation to omentectomy for resectable advanced gastric cancer. Patients aged 20-79 years, histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma, clinical subserosal/serosal invasion, and expected R0 (curative) resection are randomly assigned (1:1) during surgery to either omentum preservation or omentectomy. Total or distal gastrectomy with D2 dissection is performed in both arms. Laparoscopic gastrectomy is not allowed. Intraoperative photographs of the dissected field are centrally reviewed for all patients for quality control. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, blood loss, operation time, and adverse events. Sample size was set at 1050 considering expected 3-year RFS of 77% in both arms with non-inferiority margin of 5%, one-sided alpha of 5%, and power of 80%. Planned accrual and follow up period are 6.5 years and 3 years respectively. The trial was activated in March 2019, and 177 patients are enrolled as of January 2020. Clinical trial information: UMIN000036253 .
POF (paclitaxel/oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin) versus SOX/CAPOX/FOLFOX as a postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected stage III gastric cancer: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, FNF-014 trial.
Authors: Su Liyu , Li Chunxiang , Huang Feng , Chen Lu chuan , Cai Lisheng , Li Jiayi , Zhao Shen , Lin Rongbo ,   FNF Independent Investigations Group
Published: May 2020

TPS4647 Background: Postoperative chemotherapy (S-1, CAPOX, or Docetaxel/S-1) is a standard treatment for stage II/III gastric cancer in Asia. With regard to single agent or doublet, the need for improvement has consistently been pointed out because of the relatively poor outcome for patients with stage III gastric cancer. Triplet (FLOT) has shown significant survival benefits in perioperative setting. POF, our regiment similar to FLOT, demonstrated priority to doublet (FOLFOX) in advanced setting (2019 ASCO-GI). We conducted a randomized, multicenter, phase III study to compare triplet to doublet regimens for patients with stage III gastric cancer. Methods: This is currently enrolling patients (n = 544) with pathologic stage III gastric cancer after D2 lymph node dissection. Patients are randomized 1:1 and stratified by tumor stage (IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC, AJCC 8th) into POF or SOX/CAPOX/FOLFOX (chosen by the clinicians). SOX: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1, oral S-1 80mg/m2 divided by two on days 1 to 14 every 21 days for 8 cycles. CAPOX: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1, oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 21 days for 8 cycles. FOLFOX: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, levo-leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus on day 1, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 hours, every 14 days for 12 cycles. Three doublets were chosen by the clinicians. POF: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, followed by FOLFOX omitted 5-FU bolus, every 14 days for 12 cycles. Eligibility criteria: patients aged 18-70 years, primary histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma (including adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction) of stage III with no evidence of metastatic disease, R0 resection with D2 lymph node dissection, good performance status (ECOG PS ≤1). Subjects must be able to take orally, and without other concomitant medical conditions that required treatment, initially treated with curative surgery followed by chemotherapy within 42 days. Life expectancy estimated more than 6 months. Adequate organ function. All patients provided written informed consent prior to treatment. Key exclusion criteria: patients with other primary malignancies, gastrointestinal bleeding. The primary end point is 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary end points are 3-year overall survival, 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and adverse events. Clinical trial information: NCT03788226 .
Trial in progress: A phase I study of AMG 199, a half-life extended bispecific T-cell engager (HLE BiTE) immune therapy, targeting MUC17 in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer.
Authors: Chao Joseph , Buxó Elvira , Cervantes Andrés , Dayyani Farshid , Rocha Lima Caio Max Sao Pedro , Greil Richard , Van Laarhoven Hanneke W.M. , Lorenzen Sylvie , Heinemann Volker , Kischel Roman , Shitara Kohei , Lordick Florian 
Published: May 2020

TPS4649 Background: Prognosis for advanced G/GEJ cancer is poor and new treatment modalities are urgently needed. MUC17 is a transmembrane protein overexpressed and differentially localized on the cell membrane of G/GEJ cancer cells; expression and localization in normal cells is much more limited. AMG 199 is an HLE BiTE immune therapy designed to engage CD3-positive T cells to MUC17-positive G/GEJ cancer cells, mediate redirected tumor cell lysis, and induce T cell activation and proliferation. A clinical trial is being conducted for this novel and targeted immune therapy agent in patients with MUC17-positive G/GEJ cancer. Methods: This is a first-in-human phase 1, open-label, dose escalating study (NCT04117958) evaluating AMG 199 in patients with MUC17-positive G/GEJ cancer. Key eligibility criteria include metastatic or locally advanced unresectable MUC17-positive (as determined by IHC using a central laboratory assay) gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma ineligible for curative surgery and relapsed or treatment-refractory following ≥2 lines including a platinum, a fluoropyrimidine, taxane or irinotecan, and an approved vascular endothelial growth factor receptor antibody or tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Patients eligible for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) directed therapy should have received an approved HER2 targeting antibody. Primary endpoints include: dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-emergent or -related adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), and laboratory changes. Secondary endpoints include: pharmacokinetics of AMG 199, objective response, duration of response, time to progression, 6-month and 1-year progression-free survival, and 1-year and 2-year overall survival. The dose exploration (n = 30) will estimate the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended phase 2 dose; this will be followed by a dose expansion (n = 40) and evaluation of the benefit/risk profile of AMG 199. The study began enrolling patients in January 2020 and is ongoing. This is the first clinical trial to investigate MUC17 as a potential anti-tumor target. For more information, please contact Amgen Medical Information: medinfo@amgen.com . Clinical trial information: NCT04117958 .
An exploratory study of fruquintinib as second-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.
Authors: Li Qiu , Zhang Pengfei 
Published: May 2020

TPS4657 Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a relatively uncommon but highly fatal malignancy and most patients with BTC are diagnosed at advanced stages. Currently, no standard second-line treatment has been established following recurrence from the first-line treatment. VEGF is highly expressed in more than 50% of BTC, which indicates anti-angiogenesis might be a potentially effective method to improve the outcome in BTC. Fruquintinib is a novel small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3 and is currently being evaluated in clinical trials for multiple cancers including lung cancer, gastric cancer and colorectal cancer, and showed strong anti-tumor activity. However, the effect and safety of fruquintinib has not been investigated in the setting of second-line treatment for BTC. Methods: The study is a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial of fruquintinib (5 mg, po, for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off, 4 weeks for a cycle) for patients with advanced or metastatic BTC who have failed to first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) with the null hypotheses of 8 weeks, and the median PFS≥15 weeks as evidence of the study drug activity (α=0.05, 80% power, one-sided). The number of patients required to complete the study is 27. Allowing for 20% expulsion rate, the study needs 33 patients. The secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety and quality of life (QoL). Meanwhile, the study also set an exploratory objective to evaluate the mutation status of related genes in plasma (cfDNA) and tumor tissue and explore the interplay between mutation patterns with efficacy. Major eligibility requirements: Age ≥18 years; Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced or metastatic biliary tract adenocarcinoma; First-line chemotherapy failed (tumor progression or intolerable adverse events); No less than 3 months of expected survival; ECOG PS≤1; At least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1 criteria; Adequate organ function. Eligible patients with advanced or metastatic BTC refractory to first-line chemotherapy will be enrolled at 7 medical centers in China. The study is open and actively enrolling at time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT04156958 .
An exploratory study of sorafenib plus toripalimab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.
Authors: Yang Yu , Li Qiu 
Published: May 2020

TPS4658 Background: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is common among advanced hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC), resulting in poor prognosis. As the standard first-line treatment, the efficacy of Sorafenib is not satisfactory in HCC with PVTT. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have made a breakthrough in treatment of advanced HCC, objective response rate (ORR) of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody monotherapy is only 17-20%. Recently, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenesis therapy have shown good efficacy in the clinical studies. However, the data on immunotherapy for HCC with PVTT are still limited. Toripalimab is the first Chinese-produced anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody marketed. We designed the study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Sorafenib plus Toripalimab as the first-line treatment for unresectable HCC with PVTT. Methods: The study is a multicenter, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial. The primary objectives are 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate and safety. Secondary objectives include ORR, disease control rate, PFS, overall survival. The escalation stage includes two dose cohorts: Sorafenib 400 mg po qd or 400 mg bid combined with Toripalimab 240 mg iv d1 q3w. 6-12 patients are estimated to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity within the first 42 days of administration. In the expansion stage, patients are treated with the recommended dose based on the escalation stage, until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. Assuming Sorafenib plus Toripalimab can improve the 6-month PFS rate to 40% (Sorafenib:20%, β = 0.2, α = 0.05) and dropout is 10%, this stage need 39 patients. A total of 45-51 patients are enrolled. Major eligibility requirements include: unresectable HCC with diagnoses confirmed histologically or cytologically, or confirmed clinically in accordance with Chinese guideline for HCC diagnosis and treatment (v2017); radiographic evidence of PVTT; age ≥18 and < 75 years; at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1; a predicted life expectancy ≥ 3 months; ECOG PS≤1, Child-Pugh class A or B (≤7); no any prior systemic anti-cancer treatment; adequate organ function. Patients with hepatitis B treated with antiviral therapy (viral load < 100 IU/mL) or patients with chronic hepatitis C can be included. The study is open and actively enrolling at time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT04069949 .
A randomized phase II study of second-line treatment with liposomal irinotecan, and S-1 versus liposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.
Authors: Pijnappel Esther , Vos-Geelen Judith de , Macarulla Mercade Teresa , Melisi Davide , Pfeiffer Per , Prager Gerald W. , Van Laarhoven Hanneke W.M. , Wilmink Johanna 
Published: May 2020

TPS4664 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the deadliest form of cancer with a 5-year survival of less than 5% for patients with metastatic disease. Despite improvements over the past years, with the introduction of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, the majority has disease progression within 6 months after start of first line treatment. The NAPOLI trial was the first phase III study showing that patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that progressed after treatment with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy benefitted from second line treatment. Patients received liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) either as a single agent or in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV), or 5-FU/LV alone. Patients treated with both nal-IRI and 5-FU/LV experienced a median overall survival (mOS) of 6.1 months versus 4.2 months for the 5-FU/LV group. Recently, two Japanese studies (GEST and JASPAC 01) reported on the use of S-1 in patients with PDAC. In patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC, S-1 was non-inferior compared to gemcitabine in terms of mOS (8.8 months for gemcitabine versus 9.7 months for S-1). In the adjuvant setting, S-1 showed superior mOS compared to gemcitabine, 46.5 and 25.5 months respectively, HR for mortality of S-1 compared with gemcitabine was 0.57 (95% CI 0.44–0.72). In view of these results, the objective of this NAPAN study is to compare the progression free survival (PFS) of nal-IRI plus S-1, with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in a Western study population for second line treatment of PDAC. Methods: This is a multi-center, open label, randomized phase II trial. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with histologically or cytologically confirmed PDAC, previously treated with gemcitabine (-based) therapy, or progression within 6 months of adjuvant gemcitabine-based treatment are eligible. After a safety run-in of the nal-IRI plus S-1 regimen, patients will be randomized between nal-IRI plus S-1 and nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV. Primary endpoint of the run-in phase is to determine dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of nal-IRI when co-administered with fixed dose S-1. The primary endpoint of the phase II part is to determine the efficacy of the treatment arms in terms of PFS. Secondary endpoints include OS, response rate according to RECIST 1.1, adverse events according to CTC version 5.0 and Quality of life. Until now 2 of the planned 120 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03986294 .
A phase II study of siG12D-LODER in combination with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PROTACT).
Authors: Varghese Anna M. , Ang Celina , Dimaio Christopher J. , Javle Milind M. , Gutierrez Martin , Yarom Nirit , Stemmer Salomon M. , Golan Talia , Geva Ravit , Semenisty Valeriya , Khamaysi Iyad , Ligresti Rosario , Rotkopf Shay , Gabai-Malka Racheli , Galun Eithan , Shemi Amotz , Schattner Mark , O'Reilly Eileen Mary 
Published: May 2020

TPS4672 Background: KRAS alterations are the most frequent driver alterations identified in pancreas cancer; however, KRAS has remained an elusive therapeutic target. siG12D-LODER is a novel, miniature bio-degradable polymeric matrix encompassing a novel small interfering RNA targeting KRAS G12D and all additional G12X mutations (G12C, G12V...). The siG12D-LODER is inserted directly into the pancreas tumor via endoscopic intervention. A Phase 1/2a dose escalation and expansion study of patients receiving a one-time dose of siG12D-LODER with ongoing chemotherapy demonstrated that the combination was well-tolerated and safe and exhibited promising potential efficacy with 10/12 patients achieving disease control and median overall survival 15.1 months (Golan, Oncotarget 2015). Methods: This phase 2 study was initially designed as a randomized, two arm, open label study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel with or without siG12D-LODER for patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer with planned 40 patients in each arm and primary endpoint of progression-free survival. Eighteen patients were enrolled in the chemotherapy alone arm and 18 in the chemotherapy and siG12D-LODER arm. After an interim analysis, the study design has been amended and is now a single arm study in which patients (N=39) with both borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreas cancer will receive investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (the combination of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or modified FOLFIRINOX) and all patients will receive up to three doses of the siG12D-LODER administered once every 12 weeks. Primary endpoint is overall response rate after final siG12D-LODER insertion. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, time to response, percentage of patients proceeding to surgical resection, and percentage of patients receiving radiation therapy. Exploratory analyses include evaluation of KRAS mutation status and monitoring of circulating free DNA and circulating tumor cells. The amended protocol is now open for accrual and four patients having been enrolled to date. Trial accrual is anticipated to be completed by December 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT01676259 .