Patterns of human exposure to malaria vectors in Zanzibar and implications for malaria elimination efforts
Authors: Monroe April , Msaky Dickson , Kiware Samson , Tarimo Brian , Moore Sarah , Haji Khamis , Koenker Hannah , Harvey Steven , Finda Marceline , Ngowo Halfan , Mihayo Kimberly , Greer George , Ali Abdullah , Okumu Fredros 
Published: November 2019

Abstract
Background: Zanzibar provides a good case study for malaria elimination. The islands have experienced a dramatic reduction in malaria burden since the introduction of effective vector control interventions and case management. Malaria prevalence has now been maintained below 1% for the past decade and the islands can feasibly aim for elimination. Methods: To better understand factors that may contribute to remaining low-level malaria transmission in Zanzibar, layered human behavioral and entomological research was conducted between December 2016 and December 2017 in 135 randomly selected households across six administrative wards selected based on high annual parasite incidence and receipt of indoor residual spraying (IRS). The study included: 1) household surveys, 2) structured household observations of nighttime activity and sleeping patterns, and 3) paired indoor and outdoor mosquito collections. Entomological and human behavioral data were integrated to provide weighted estimates of exposure to vector bites, accounting for proportions of people indoors or outdoors, and protected by insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) each hour of the night. Results: The percentage of study participants outdoors and away from home peaked in the early evening with a higher percentage of males observed away throughout the night compared to females. Overall, 92% of female Anopheles mosquitoes were caught in the rainy season compared to 8% in the dry season and 72% were caught outdoors compared to 28% indoors. Observed levels of ITN use were estimated to prevent an average of 42% of exposure to vector bites of all exposure that would otherwise occur. For ITN users, use of an ITN while asleep prevented an estimated two-thirds (66%) of exposure to vector bites and nearly three quarters (73%) of remaining exposure was estimated to occur outdoors. Discussion/Conclusions: This study identified gaps in malaria prevention in Zanzibar with results directly applicable for improving ongoing program activities. While overall biting risk was low, the most notable finding was that current levels of ITN use are estimated to prevent less than half of exposure to malaria vector bites. Variation in ITN use across sites suggests that additional gains could be made through targeted social and behavior change interventions in sites with low levels of ITN use, with additional focus on increasing net use in the rainy season when biting risk is higher. However, even for ITN users, gaps in protection remain, with a majority of exposure to vector bites occurring outdoors before going to sleep. Supplemental interventions targeting outdoor exposure to malaria vectors, and groups that may be at increased risk of exposure to malaria vectors, should be explored. Interventions such as larval source management, which can reduce both indoor and outdoor-biting vector populations, could also be considered.