Hydroxychloroquine in patients mainly with mild to moderate COVID–19: an open–label, randomized, controlled trial
Authors: Tang Wei , Cao Zhujun , Han Mingfeng , Wang Zhengyan , Chen Junwen , Sun Wenjin , Wu Yaojie , Xiao Wei , Liu Shengyong , Chen Erzhen , Chen Wei , Wang Xiongbiao , Yang Jiuyong , Lin Jun , Zhao Qingxia , Yan Youqin , Xie Zhibin , Li Dan , Yang Yaofeng , Liu Leshan , Qu Jieming , Ning Guang , Shi Guochao , Xie Qing 
Published: April 2020

AbstractObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plus standard–of–care (SOC) compared with SOC alone in adult patients with COVID–19.DesignMulticenter, open–label, randomized controlled trial.Setting16 government–designated COVID–19 treatment centers in China through 11 to 29 in February 2020.Participants150 patients hospitalized with laboratory confirmed COVID–19 were included in the intention to treat analysis. 75 patients were assigned to HCQ plus SOC and 75 to SOC alone.InterventionsHCQ was administrated with a loading dose of 1, 200 mg daily for three days followed by a maintained dose of 800 mg daily for the remaining days (total treatment duration: 2 or 3 weeks for mild/moderate or severe patients, respectively).Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was whether participants had a negative conversion of SARS–CoV–2 by 28 days, and was analyzed according to the intention–to–treat principle. Adverse events were analyzed in the safety population in which HCQ recipients were participants who actually received at least one dose of HCQ and HCQ non–recipients were those actually managed with SOC alone.ResultsAmong 150 patients, 148 were with mild to moderate disease and 2 were with severe disease. The mean days (± standard deviation, min to max) from symptoms onset to randomization was 16.6 (±10.5 days, 3 to 41 days). The negative conversion probability by 28 days in SOC plus HCQ group was 85.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.8% to 93.8%), similar to that in the SOC group 81.3% (95%CI 71.2% to 89.6%). Between–group difference was 4.1% (95%CI –10.3% to 18.5%). In the safety population, adverse events were recorded in 7 (8.8%) HCQ non–recipients (N=80) and in 21 (30%) HCQ recipients (N=70). The most common adverse event in the HCQ recipients was diarrhea, reported in 7 (10%) patients. Two HCQ recipients reported serious adverse events.ConclusionsThe administration of HCQ did not result in a significantly higher negative conversion probability than SOC alone in patients mainly hospitalized with persistent mild to moderate COVID–19. Adverse events were higher in HCQ recipients than in HCQ non–recipients.Trial registrationChiCTR2000029868What is already known on this topic—The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) imposes substantial burdens on individuals, communities, health–care facilities, markets, governments, etc. globally.—There is no specific treatment approved for COVID–19 or vaccine to prevent infection with the novel coronavirus.—During the urgent pandemic, media headlines the utility of drugs without solid evidence but buries the side–effects of these drugs.What this study adds—In this randomized clinical trial of patients mainly with persistent mild to moderate COVID–19, exposure to hydroxychloroquine led to a similar probability of virus elimination comparing to the current standard–of–care.—Adverse events, mostly gastrointestinal related, were significantly increased in patients who received hydroxychloroquine.—Overall, the results from our trial do not support the use of hydroxychloroquine in patients with persistent mild to moderate COVID–19.Print abstractStudy questionTo assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plus standard–of–care (SOC) compared with SOC alone in adult patients with COVID–19.MethodsThis is a multicenter, open–label, randomized controlled trial conducted in 16 government–designated COVID–19 treatment centers in China through 11 to 29 in February 2020. A total of 150 patients hospitalized with laboratory confirmed COVID–19 were included in the intention to treat analysis. Among them, 75 patients were assigned to HCQ plus SOC and 75 to SOC alone. HCQ was administrated with a loading dose of 1, 200 mg daily for three days followed by a maintained dose of 800 mg daily for the remaining days (total treatment duration: 2 or 3 weeks for mild/moderate or severe patients, respectively). The primary outcome was whether participants had a negative conversion of SARS–CoV–2 by 28 days, and was analyzed according to the intention to treat principle. Adverse events were analyzed in the safety population in which HCQ recipients were participants who actually received at least one dose of HCQ and HCQ non–recipients were those actually managed with SOC alone.Study answer and limitationsAmong 150 patients, 148 were with mild to moderate disease and 2 were with severe disease. The mean days (± standard deviation, min to max) from symptoms onset to randomization was 16.6 (±10.5 days, 3 to 41 days). The negative conversion probability by 28 days in SOC plus HCQ group was 85.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.8% to 93.8%), similar to that in the SOC group 81.3% (95%CI 71.2% to 89.6%). Between–group difference was 4.1% (95%CI –10.3% to 18.5%). In the safety population, adverse events were recorded in 7 (8.8%) HCQ non–recipients (N=80) and in 21 (30%) HCQ recipients (N=70) with two serious adverse events. The most common adverse event in the HCQ recipients was diarrhea, reported in 7 (10%) patients. Two HCQ recipients reported serious adverse events.What this study addsOur trial does not support the use of hydroxychloroquine in patients with persistent mild to moderate COVID–19 due to limited effects on virus eliminating and significantly increased adverse events.Funding, competing interests, data sharingThis work was supported by the Emergent Projects of National Science and Technology (2020YFC0844500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81970020, 81770025), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0901104), Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty (shslczdzk02202, shslczdzk01103), National Innovative Research Team of High–level Local Universities in Shanghai, Shanghai Key Discipline for Respiratory Diseases (2017ZZ02014), National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Significant New Drugs Development (2017ZX09304007), Key Projects in the National Science and Technology Pillar Program during the Thirteenth Five–year Plan Period (2018ZX09206005–004, 2017ZX10202202–005–004, 2017ZX10203201–008). All authors declared no competing interests. Anonymized datasets can be made available on reasonable request after approval from the trial management committee.Study registrationChiCTR2000029868