Rapid Personalized Manufacture (RPM) of Sleeping Beauty System-Generated NY-ESO-1-Specific TCR-T Cells Co-Expressing Membrane-Bound IL-15 Yields Anti-Tumor Responses
Authors: Hurton Lenka V , Mi Tiejuan , Switzer Kirsten C , Zhang Ling , Dai Cuiping , Kim Misun , Bavisi Karishma R , Figliola Matthew J , Lydia Vazquez M , Maiti Sourindra N , Su Shihuang , Deniger Drew C , Olivares Simon , Cooper Laurence J N , Singh Harjeet 
Published: November 2019

CAR-redirected T cells have demonstrated clinical effectiveness in early phase clinical trials, with persistence of adoptively transferred CD19-specific T cells correlated with positive outcomes. Notwithstanding the successes for some hematological malignancies, CAR-T targets a limited number of cell-surface antigens that curtails their appeal for solid tumors. This can be overcome by TCR gene transfer with specificity for intracellular tumor-associated antigens such as NY-ESO-1 expressed by hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. The predominant technologies for both CAR- and TCR-redirection of T cells utilize viral genetic modification as well as require a lengthy period of in vitro propagation with resultant deleterious differentiation to achieve clinically relevant cell numbers. A major impediment with current TCR-T is the high-cost and lengthy time associated with a viral-based manufacture of a library of TCRs that can address a multitude of desired targets and match HLA restriction to meet the need to infuse personalized TCR-T products with multiple specificities in each recipient. The Sleeping Beauty (SB) platform is the most clinically advanced non-viral gene transfer technology and overcomes the issues of scalability with viral based manufacture of TCR-T. We initially showed in pre-clinical models that co-expression of membrane-bound interleukin-15 (mbIL15) enhanced in vivo persistence of CAR-T (PMID: 27849617). This technology has been recently advanced to produce CD19-specific T cells in ≤ 2 days after electro-transfer of DNA plasmids using so-called "rapid personalized manufacture" (RPM). This was based on the SB system to stably co-express CAR and mbIL15 with a kill switch (HER1t). We have now adapted these technologies to address current limitations for T-cell therapy by using the RPM process to very rapidly generate TCR-modified T cells. The rationale for RPM of TCR-T is based on: (i) SB to genetically modify resting T cells thus eliminating the need to propagate cells prior to, or after, genetic modification, (ii) introduction of TCR to redirect T-cell specificity to tumor-associated antigens, (iii) mbIL15-HER1t to support T-cell persistence and enable selective elimination to increase safety, and (iv) manufacture within two days of gene transfer which limits T-cell differentiation and decreases time to manufacture. Mononuclear cells were electroporated with SB-derived DNA plasmids expressing (a) HLA A2-restricted NY-ESO-1-specific TCR or (b) the TCR and mbIL15-HER1t in separate plasmids. Following electroporation, cells were directly (unpropagated) injected into NSG (immunocompromised) mice bearing established HLA A2+ NY-ESO-1+ tumor. Administration of RPM TCR-mbIL15 T cells exhibited superior anti-tumor activity compared with RPM TCR T cells (Figure). Though engraftment of TCR+ T cells was not significantly different between the two groups, the RPM TCR-mbIL15 T cell-treated mice exhibited increased frequency of CD27+TCR+ T cells (p = 0.035, n = 6-7, Mann Whitney test), a phenotype that is correlated with improved therapeutic responses in human subjects. The RPM technology can thus be adapted to co-express TCR with mbIL15 (and HER1t), which can now be scaled to provide a cost-effective approach to manufacturing a multitude of TCR-T products from a library of TCRs with the necessary complexity to manage the range of specificities and HLA restrictions to treat multiple patients.

Disclosures
Hurton: • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center: Patents & Royalties; Intrexon: Patents & Royalties: US 9,629,877 B2 ; Ziopharm Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: US 9,629,877 B2 . Zhang:Intrexon: Patents & Royalties: US 9,629,877 B2; Ziopharm Oncology: Patents & Royalties: US 9,629,877 B2. Deniger:Ziopharm Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership. Olivares:Ziopharm Oncology: Patents & Royalties: US9629877B2, US20160158285A1, WO2009091826A2, US20190085079A1, US20170158749A1, US20170333480A1, US20190055299A1; Intrexon: Patents & Royalties: US9629877B2, US20160158285A1, WO2009091826A2, US20190085079A1, US20170158749A1, US20170333480A1, US20190055299A1. Cooper:CytoSen: Equity Ownership; Targazyme: Equity Ownership; MD Anderson Cancer Center: Patents & Royalties; Sangamo BioSciences: Patents & Royalties; Immatics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; City of Hope: Patents & Royalties; Ziopharm Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Contracted research, Patents & Royalties; Secure Transfusion Services: Equity Ownership; CellChorus: Equity Ownership. Singh:Ziopharm Oncology: Patents & Royalties: US9629877B2, US20160096902A1, US20170333480A1, US10125193B2; Intrexon: Patents & Royalties: US9629877B2, US20160096902A1, US20170333480A1, US10125193B2.