bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Clinical characterization of hypoxia in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by 18F-FAZA PET and pimonidazole.
Authors: Metran Nascente Cristiane , Dhani Neesha C. , Vines Douglass , Yeung Ivan , Metser Ur , Serra Stefano , Milosevic Michael , Gallinger Steven , Hedley David W. 
Published: March 2020

4049 Background: We previously demonstrated correlation between hypoxia and aggressive tumor biology in orthotopic, patient-derived pancreatic xenografts (Chang et al. Cancer Res 2011). With the development of hypoxia-directed therapies, there is a need to understand the range and relevance of hypoxia in PDAC patients. We therefore launched two complementary clinical trials using 2-nitroimidazole-based hypoxia probes. Methods: PIMO-PANC involves pre-operative administration of pimonidazole to patients (pts) undergoing PDAC resection. Hypoxic percent (HP) of tumors is determined by semi-automated image analysis (on Aperio’s Genie) of multiple histological sections stained for pimonidazole by immunohistochemistry (IHC). FAZA-PANC uses the positron emission tomography (PET) tracer fluoroazomycin arabinoside (18F-FAZA) to evaluate hypoxia by functional imaging. 2 hours post-injection of (5.2 MBq/kg) 18F-FAZA, static scans are acquired followed by computed tomography for anatomic registration. Skeletal muscle is a non-hypoxic reference tissue to define standardized uptake values (SUV), tumor to muscle uptake ratios (T/M’s) and a threshold for hypoxia. Results: PIMO-PANC has enrolled 29 pts and FAZA-PANC 16. IHC analysis of the first 10 pt tumors demonstrates considerable intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity of hypoxia (HP: 1 to 26% across pt tumors); minimal hypoxia (< 5%) was observed in 3 pts. 18F-FAZA-PET in the first 11 pts demonstrates SUVmax from 1.02 to 1.83, median T/M's from 0.84 to 1.31. A threshold of 1.27 SUVmax defines HP of 0 to 60% with minimal hypoxia (<10%) in 5 pts. Conclusions: There is significant heterogeneity of hypoxia across the spectrum of clinical PDAC (local to metastatic disease) using the 2-nitroimidazole hypoxia probes pimonidazole and 18F-FAZA. Given the intra-tumoral heterogeneity of hypoxia by histopathology, functional imaging is the preferred method to assess hypoxia in PDAC patients. Importantly, both methods identified a group of PDAC tumors with low levels of hypoxia. This is relevant to the on-going development of hypoxia-targeting strategies. Accrual to PIMO-PANC is on-going and will address the prognostic relevance of hypoxia in PDAC. Clinical trial information: NCT01542177 and NCT01248637.
Significance of baseline quality of life scores in predicting clinical outcomes in an international phase III trial of advanced pancreatic cancer: NCIC CTG PA.3.
Authors: Vickers Michael M. , Tu Dongsheng , Lee Chee , Wheatley-Price Paul , Parulekar Wendy , Brundage Michael Donald , Moore Malcolm J. , Au Heather-Jane , O'Callaghan Christopher J. , Jonker Derek J. , Ringash Jolie , Goldstein David 
Published: March 2020

4053 Background: There is insufficient information regarding the prognostic significance of baseline Quality of life (QoL) scores on overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) in advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: QoL was assessed prospectively using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and AEs were graded using the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0 as part of the PA.3 trial of gemcitabine + erlotinib (G+E) vs. gemcitabine + placebo (G+P). Relevant clinical variables, ECOG performance status (PS), and QoL scores at baseline were analyzed by Cox stepwise regression to determine predictors of OS and AEs. QoL scores were transformed by square root. Results: 222 of 285 patients (pts) (78%) treated with G+E and 220 of 284 pts (77%) treated with G+P completed baseline QoL assessments. In a multivariate Cox analysis (MVA) combining all pts, better QoL physical function (PF) score independently and incrementally predicted longer OS (HR 0.91; CI: 0.83-1.00), as did non-white race (HR 0.62; CI: 0.42-0.91), PS 0-1 (vs. PS 2 - HR 0.64; CI: 0.49-0.84), locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) (vs. metastatic - HR 0.54; CI: 0.42-0.69) and G+E (vs. G+P - HR 0.79; CI: 0.64-0.98). More financial difficulty (HR 0.92; CI: 0.87-0.98) and PS 0-1 (HR: 0.36; CI: 0.17-0.77) predicted a lower risk of grade 3 or higher AEs. In a MVA of pts treated with G+E, pain intensity <20 (vs. ≥ 20 - HR 0.68; CI:0.52-0.88) and LAPC (HR 0.67; CI: 0.48-0.91) were associated with longer OS, while better QoL cognitive (HR 0.71; CI: 0.50-1.00), worse constipation (HR 0.89; CI: 0.81-0.98) and worse financial scores (HR 0.86; CI: 0.78-0.94), better dyspnea score (HR 0.82; CI: 0.71-0.93) and PS 0-1 (HR 0.21; CI: 0.05-0.78) predicted for lower risk of AEs. In a MVA of pts treated with G+P, better global QoL score (HR 0.91; CI:0.85-0.98) and LAPC (HR 0.57; CI: 0.40-0.82) were predictors of longer OS while no variables predicted grade 3 or higher AEs. Conclusions: In addition to clinical variables (including physician assessed PS), patient reported QoL scores added incremental predictive information regarding survival and adverse events for advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with systemic chemotherapy.
Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of gemcitabine with or without bavituximab in patients with nonresectable stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Pandya Shuchi Sumant , Wong Lucas , Bullock Andrea J. , Grabelsky Stephen A. , Shum Merrill Kingman , Shan Joseph , Menander Kerstin B. , Reid Tony R. 
Published: March 2020

4054 Background: Despite advances in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC), there is critical need to develop novel therapies.Median survival with combination chemotherapy is limited to less than one year and only the optimally conditioned patients can tolerate these therapies. Bavituximab (B) is a monoclonal antibody (mAB) directed againstphosphatidylserine (PS) that causes vascular shutdown and reactivation of the innate and adaptive immunity in animal models. Preclinical data in mouse PC models indicate that gemcitabine (G) increases PS exposure and the addition of a mAb targeting PS reduces tumor burden, visible liver metastases, microvessel density, and increases tumor macrophage infiltration compared to G alone (Beck et al. 2006). The purpose of this trial is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of G+B vs. G alone as first line therapy in pts. with nonresectable Stage IV PC. Methods: Seventy patients were randomized (1:1) to receive G 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28Edays with or without weekly B 3mg/kg IV until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Key eligibility criteria were Stage IV PC, ECOG ≤2, measurable disease, age≥18 years, total bilirubin ≤1.5xULN, and adequate renal, hematologic, and hepatic function. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Of the 70 (G/G+B 34/36) patients randomized, 67 (G/G+B 33/34) received study treatment and 63 (G/G+B 31/32) were evaluable. No significant difference was seen in age, gender, race or ECOG. At analysis 87% deaths had been reported in G and 72% in G+B group. Median OS estimate is 5.2 months for G and 5.6 months for G+B. No difference between groups was observed in PFS (median 3.9 months for G and 3.7 months for G+B). ORR was 13% for G and 28% for G+B. Most AEs were grade 1-2 and typical of exposure to G. Conclusions: In this patient population with extensive disease burdens and limited treatment options, G+B was well tolerated and demonstrated moderate activity in tumor response and survival. Clinical trial information: NCT01272791.
Willingness of patients with pancreatic cancer to participate in clinical trials.
Authors: Cinar Pelin , Talley Anitra W. , Hwang Jimmy , Dohan Daniel Paul , Tempero Margaret A. 
Published: March 2020

4055 Background: Recruitment of oncology patients into clinical trials continues to be a challenge as <5% of patients are accrued. Low accrual rates may be due to reduced awareness of trial availability and eligibility by physicians/patients. Our objective was to study the attitudes of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) regarding clinical trial participation and to identify possible barriers to recruitment. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we collaborated with Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) and invited patients with PC or their caregivers to complete a survey. The survey that was developed consisted of 22 questions and inquired about patients’ previous clinical trial enrollment experiences and their views on participation. The surveys were collected over a 6-month period via the PanCAN website and regional meetings. Comparison analyses between groups were done by Chi-square and Fisher’s test using STATA software. Results: Of the390 surveys received, 149 were included in the final analyses. 30% of the patients were offered to participate in a trial by their physicians. When asked to participate, 62% of the patients agreed. Of the patients who were not enrolled in a clinical trial, 61% were offered to participate in a trial but did not agree. This suggests that these patients were eligible to participate but declined. Conclusions: Majority of the patients with pancreatic cancer were not offered to participate in clinical trials by their physicians but would have agreed if asked. While low clinical trial recruitment rates for PC may be multifactorial, further research may focus on the important role of physicians in clinical trial recruitment efforts. [Table: see text]
A randomized phase II trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus S-1 and gemcitabine (GS) versus gemcitabine alone (GEM) in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (CAP-002 study).
Authors: Yoshitomi Hideyuki , Shimizu Hiroaki , Yoshidome Hiroyuki , Ohtsuka Masayuki , Kato Atsushi , Furukawa Katsunori , Takayashiki Tsukasa , Kuboki Satoshi , Okamura Daiki , Suzuki Daisuke , Nakajima Masayuki , Aida Toshiaki , Miyazaki Masaru ,   Chiba Study Group of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer (CAP)
Published: March 2020

4056 Background: Although the adjuvant therapy using GEM is now the standard therapy for patients with resected pancreatic cancer (PC), the prognosis still remains poor. Resent study demonstrated the non-inferiority of S-1 and superiority of GS to GEM with respect to progression free survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with invasive ductal PC who underwent radical surgery were enrolled. After stratification for R0/1, stage and institution, patients were randomized to receive GEM (GEM 1g/ m2, iv, d1, 8, and 15, q4w X12), S-1 (80/100/120mg/day based on BSA, po, d1-14, q3w X 16) or GS (S-1 60/80/100mg/day based on BSA po, d1-14 plus GEM 1g/ m2, iv, d8, 15, q3w X 16) within 8weeks after operation. Eligibility included histological residual tumor (R) 0 or 1, and no previous chemo- or/and radiation therapy. Primary endpoint was 2y disease free survival (DFS) rate and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Between January 2007 and October 2010, 96 patients were randomized into the three arms of the trial (32 pts to each group). Patients’ characteristics were well balanced (GEM/S-1/GS) with regard to age (66/67/66y), tumor location (head 66/69/75%), tumor status (T3+4 88/78/91%), and nodal status (positive 75/69/75%). Until November 2012, 74 events (77%) have occurred for DFS. Two year DFS rate was 24.2%, 28.1% and 34.4% in GEM, S-1 and GS, respectively and there was no significant difference between groups. The median OS was 21m in GEM, 26m in S-1 and 27.9m in GS (Log rank test: N.S.). Grade 3/4 toxicities in GEM/S-1/GS were hematological 63/10/74% and non-hematological 17/10/23%, respectively. No treatment related death was observed during the study. Conclusions: S-1 and GS provided similar efficacy to GEM as the adjuvant chemotherapy for resected PC. According to the results, S-1 and GS is the adequate combination for phase III trial to examine the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for PC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000002000.
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors: Soon Yu Yang , Leong Cheng Nang , Tey Jeremy Chee Seong , Tham Ivan Weng Keong , Lu Jiade Jay 
Published: March 2020

4066 Background: The benefits of adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (ChRT) over chemotherapy (Ch) for resectable gastric cancer are currently unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (direct and indirect) of published randomized controlled trials (RCT) to compare the effects of adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy with chemotherapy on overall and disease-free survival for patients with resectable gastric cancer. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL from the date of inception and annual meeting proceedings of ASCO and ASTRO from 1999 to November 2012 for RCTs comparing adjuvant ChRT with Ch, adjuvant ChRT with surgery alone and adjuvant Ch with surgery alone. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity. Hazard ratios (HR), confidence intervals (CI) and p values (p) were estimated with fixed effects models using Revman 5.1. Results: We found five trials comparing adjuvant ChRT with Ch (n = 1110), three trials comparing adjuvant ChRT with surgery alone (n = 651) and 31 trials comparing adjuvant Ch with surgery alone (n = 8273). Meta-analysis of direct comparison trials showed that adjuvant ChRT significantly improved both OS (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98, p = 0.03) and DFS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.92, p = 0.004) when compared with Ch. Subgroup analyses showed that the effects on OS and DFS were similar regardless of use of D2 nodal dissection, intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques, fluorouracil or platinum-based chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in toxicity between the two groups. The results for the direct and indirect comparisons were statistically consistent. Conclusions: There was a significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy over chemotherapy, with no increase in toxicity for patients with resected gastric cancer. Future efforts should also focus on predictive markers, and toxicity or quality-of-life assessments, to individualize adjuvant therapy and optimize the therapeutic ratio.
Comparison of HER2 expression in paired biopsies and surgical specimen of gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma: Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Authors: Watson Sarah , Validire Pierre , Cervera Pascale , Zorkani Nabila , Lemay Frederic , Perniceni Thierry , Paye Francois , Tournigand Christophe , Louvet Christophe 
Published: March 2020

4069 Background: HER2 is overexpressed in 10 to 20% of gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (GE-ADK), and is a target for trastuzumab in metastatic patients. We conducted a study to compare HER2 expression between diagnostic biopsies (DB) and surgical specimens (SS) of GE-ADK, and to determine the influence of non-trastuzumab containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on this expression. Methods: Pathological specimens from biopsies of 228 patients operated on with a curative aim in two French hospitals between 2004 and 2011 were collected. Two cohorts treated (n=141) or not (n=87) with a NAC were constituted. Two blind independent pathological HER2 analyses on DB and on SS were performed using IHC and CISH. HER-2 overexpression (HER2 +) was defined by a score 3+ in IHC, or 2+ with a positive CISH test, and according to the specific HER2 scoring guidelines for GE-ADK. Results: Paired HER2 status could be determined for 218 out of the 228 patients (95.6%). HER2 + rates were 13.3% on DB (29/218) and 14.7% on SS (32/218). HER2 + tumors were mainly cardial or esophageal adenocarcinomas, with a well-differentiated, intestinal histological type. HER2 status differed between DB and SS in 13 patients (6%). When DB analyses were added to SS analyses, 5 additional patients were HER2 +, the relative increase in HER2 + cases being 13.5% (17.1% for patients with NAC versus 7.1% for patients without NAC, p=0.4, NS). Differences between DB and SS HER2 expression could be explained by the intratumoral heterogeneity and also by a possible HER2 expression decrease in SS after NAC. Conclusions: The determination of HER2 status on DB provides results that complete those obtained with SS. Combining the analysis of DB and of SS enables to optimize the selection of trastuzumab-eligible patients in case of metastatic relapse, especially in patients previously treated with NAC. [Table: see text]
A validated miRNA expression profile for response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.
Authors: Skinner Heath D. , Xu Enping , Lee Jeffrey H. , Bhutani Manoop S. , Weston Brian , Suzuki Akihiro , Hofstetter Wayne Lewis , Komaki Ritsuko , Ajani Jaffer A. , Wu Xifeng 
Published: March 2020

4078 Background: For patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) preoperative chemoradiation (trimodality therapy) is the preferred approach. We examined several patient cohorts to create and validate a miRNA signature predictive for response to this therapy in esophageal carcinoma. Methods: Pre-treatment tumor specimens from 10 patients with EAC treated with trimodality therapy were examined using a TaqMan Human MicroRNA Card Set (v3.0) for expression of 754 miRNAs, of which 306 were overexpressed. miRNA expression between patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) and those with a non-pCR was then analyzed. 44 miRNAs differentially expressed between pCR and non-pCR patients were then examined in an additional 42 EAC patientsÕ tumors (model set) using the Fluodigm 48.48 Dynamic Array and were used to generate a miRNA expression profile (MEP) predicting for response in three groups: low, intermediate and high-risk. The MEP was then validated in an additional 72 EAC patients using the Illumina miRNA Expression Array. ROC curves were generated for clinical stage, MEP and a combination of both. Results: For the model set, pCR rates in low risk patients based on the MEP were 75%, 42.9% in intermediate risk and 12.5% in high-risk patients (ptrend=0.008). In the validation set the pCR rates were 66.7%, 36.5% and 15.7% for low, intermediate and high-risk patients respectively (ptrend=0.025). The AUC for the ROC using the MEP was 0.72 (p=7.8x10-12) in the model set, 0.69 (p=1x10-4) in the validation set and 0.7 for the two cohorts combined (p=1.4x10-18). When clinical stage was added to the predictive model, the ROC for each group was 0.79 (p=2.6x10-19), 0.75 (p=8.7x10-27) and 0.77 (p=2x10-41) respectively. Conclusions: The MEP represents the first validated miRNA signature for therapeutic response in esophageal carcinoma and improves significantly on clinical staging. Its use could select patients at high-risk for therapeutic resistance for trial-based therapy, as well as low-risk patients for whom resection may possibly be safely omitted.
A phase II clinical trial of ganetespib (STA-9090) in previously treated patients with advanced esophagogastric cancers.
Authors: Kwak Eunice Lee , Goyal Lipika , Abrams Thomas Adam , Carpenter Amanda , Wolpin Brian M. , Wadlow Raymond Couric , Allen Jill N. , Heist Rebecca Suk , McCleary Nadine Jackson , Chan Jennifer A. , Goessling Wolfram , Schrag Deborah , Evans Colleen , Ng Kimmie , Enzinger Peter C. , Ryan David P. 
Published: March 2020

4090 Background: Subsets of esophagogastric (EG) cancers harbor genetic abnormalities, including amplification of HER2 or MET, or mutations in PIK3CA, EGFR, or BRAF. These genes encode clients of the molecular chaperone heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90), and inhibition of HSP90 may promote the degradation of these oncogenic signaling proteins. Ganetespib is a novel triazolone heterocyclic inhibitor of HSP90 that is a biologically rational treatment strategy for advanced EG cancers. Methods: This was a multicenter, single-arm Phase 2 trial. Eligibility: Histologically confirmed advanced EG cancer; progression on ≤ 2 lines of systemic therapy; ECOG PS 0-1. Treatment: Ganetespib 200mg/m2IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR). Results: 26/28 patients enrolled received ≥ 1 dose of drug. The characteristics of the 26 patients were: male 77%, median age 64 years old; ECOG PS 0/1 42/58%; median number of prior therapies 2; esophageal/GEJ/gastric 27/42/31%; prior platinum 92%, prior fluoropyrimidine 88%, prior taxane 38%, prior trastuzumab 15%. Median follow-up was 83 days. The most common drug-related adverse events were: diarrhea (77%), fatigue (65%), elevated ALKP (42%), and elevated AST (38%). The most common Grade 3/4 AEs included: leucopenia (12%), fatigue (12%), diarrhea (8%), and elevated ALKP (8%). 14/26 required ≥ 1 dose modification. 22/26 patients completed at least 2 cycles of ganetespib and were evaluable for response. One complete response was seen, and this patient continues on treatment as of cycle 31 (27.5 mos). Molecular characterization of this patient’s tumor revealed a KRAS mutation in codon 12. The ORR was 1/26 (4%). Two of six patients with HER2-positive disease achieved 12% and 19% tumor reduction from baseline, respectively. TTP was 48 days (1.6 mos) and OS was 83 days (2.8 mos). Conclusions: Ganetespib showed manageable toxicity. While the study was terminated early due to insufficient evidence of single agent activity, the durable CR and 2 minor responses suggest that there may be a subset of EG patients who could benefit from this drug. The molecular determinants of response, however, have yet to be fully characterized. Clinical trial information: CT01167114.
Natural history of malignant bone disease in gastric cancer: Final results of a multicenter bone metastasis survey.
Authors: Silvestris Nicola , Pantano Francesco , Ibrahim Toni , Gamucci Teresa , De Vita Fernando , Pedrazzoli Paolo , Barni Sandro , Maiello Evaristo , Numico Gianmauro , Catalano Vincenzo , Berardi Rossana , Di Costanzo Francesco , Cinieri Saverio , Russo Antonio , Brunetti Anna Elisabetta , Santini Daniele 
Published: March 2020

4091 Background: Bone metastasis represents an increasing clinical problem in advanced gastric cancer (GC) as disease-related survival improves. In literature few data on the natural history of bone disease in this malignancy are available. Methods: A retrospective, observational multicenter study aimed to define the natural history of GC patients with bone metastasis was conducted in 22 Italian hospital centres in which these patients received diagnosis and treatment of disease from 1998 to 2011. Data on clinicopathology, skeletal outcomes, skeletal-related events (SREs), and bone-directed therapies for 208 deceased GC patients with evidence of bone metastasis were statistically analyzed. Results: Median time to bone metastasis was 8 months (CI 95%, 6.125–9.875 months) considering all included patients. Median number of SREs/patient was one; less than half of the patients (31%) experienced at least one event and only 4 and 2% experienced at least two and three events, respectively. Median times to first and second SRE were 2 and 4 months, respectively. Median survival was 6 months after bone metastasis diagnosis and 3 months after first SRE. Median survival in patients who did not experience SREs was 5 months. Among patients who received zoledronic acid (ZOL) before the first SRE, median time to its appearance was significantly prolonged compared to control (7 months vs 4 months for control; P:0.0005). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this retrospective analysis is the largest multicenter study to demonstrate that bone metastases from GC are not so rare, are commonly aggressive and result in relatively early onset of SREs in the majority of patients. Furthermore, our large study, which included 90 patients treated with ZOL, showed, for the first time in literature, a significant extension of time to first SRE and increase in the median survival time after diagnosis of bone metastasis.