The Discursive Construction of Certainty and Uncertainty in the Scientific Texts of Forensic Psychiatry
Authors: Scardigno Rosa , Grattagliano Ignazio , Manuti Amelia , Mininni Giuseppe 
Published: July 2020

A common ground between mental health and judicial-legal domains concerns concepts like “care”, “control” and “possibility to foresee” human behaviour, with particular reference to the “social dangerousness”. The connections between these sense-making practices can be traced by discursive modulation of “certainty/uncertainty”. This study aimed to highlight the discursive peculiarities of a specific socio-cultural context and genre, namely scientific papers. The corpus of data consisted in a selection of 30 papers published by the BJP (from 1975 to 2015), on subjects concerning forensic psychiatry, subjected to Content Analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis. Results showed that the papers adopted two main socio-epistemic rhetorics. On one side, the enunciators proceeded in an “assertive” and rigorous manner through a social-epistemic rhetoric of “reassurance”; on the other side, they gave voice to rhetoric of the “limit”, lacking any cognitive “closure”. References Bakhtin, M.M. (1979). Estetika slovesnogo tvorcestva. Moskow: Iskusstvo. Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. (2008). The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 107-118. Berlin, J.A. (1993). Post-structuralism, semiotics, and social-epistemic rhetoric: Converging agendas. In T. Enos & S. Brown (Eds.), Defining the new rhetoric (pp. 137-176). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Caffi, C. (2001). La mitigazione. Un approccio pragmatico alla comunicazione nei contesti terapeutici [Mitigation. A pragmatic approach to communication within therapeutic contexts]. Münster: LIT Verlag. Cantarini, S., Abraham, W., & Leiss, E. (Eds.) (2014). Certainty-uncertainty – and the Attitudinal Space in Between [SLCS 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. Catanesi, R., Carabellese, F., & Grattagliano, I. (2009). Cura e controllo. Come cambia la pericolosità sociale psichiatrica [Treatment and control. How has the concept of psychiatric social danger changed]. Giornale Italiano di Psicopatologia, 15,: 64-74. Crismore, A., Markannen, R., & Steffenson, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written in American and Finnish University students. Written Communication, 10 (1), 39-71. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books. Grevi, V. (2006). Prove [Proof]. In V. Grevi & G. Conso (Eds.), Compendio di procedura penale [Handbook of penal procedure](pp. 313-406). Padua: Cedam. Grice, P.H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press. Gross, A.G., Harmon, J.E., & Reidy, M.S. (2002). Communicating Science. The Scientific Paper from the 17th Century to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press. Hermans, H. J. M., & Gieser, T. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17 (4), 433-454. Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. TEXT, 18(3), 349-382. Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication, 18 (4), 549-574. Junginger, J. (1996), Psychosis and violence: the case for a content analysis of psychotic experience. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22, 91-103. Kaliski, S.Z. (2002). A comparison of risk factors for habitual violence in pre-trial subjects. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 106 (412), 58-61. Kockelman, P. (2007) Agency: The Relation between Meaning, Power, and Knowledge, Current Anthropology, 48 (3), 375-401. Lamb, H., & Weimberger, L. (1998). Persons with severe mental illness in jails and prisons: A review. Psychiatric Services, 49, 483-492. Lancia, F. (2004). Strumenti per l'analisi dei testi. Introduzione all'uso di T-LAB [Instruments for Text Analysis. Introduction to the Use of T-LAB]. Milano: Franco Angeli. Lindqvist, P., & Allebeck, P. (1990), Schizophrenia and crime: a longitudinal follow-up of 644 schizophrenics in Stockolm. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 345-350. Marzuk, P. (1996), Violence, crime and mental illness: How strong a link? Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 481-486. Mininni, G., & Manuti, A. (2017). A rose is more than a rose… The diatextual constitution of subjects and objects. Text & Talk, 37 (2), 243-263. Mininni, G., Manuti, A., Scardigno, R., Rubino, R. (2014). Old roots, new branches: The shoot of diatextual analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11, 1-16. Mininni, G., Scardigno, R. & Grattagliano, I. (2014). The dialogic construction of certainty in legal contexts. Language & Dialogue. Special issue Certainty and Uncertainty in dialogue, 4 (1), 112-131. Monahan, J. (1997). Clinical and actuarial predictions of violence. In D. Faigman, D. Kaye & M. Saxs (Eds.) Modern scientific evidence: the law and science of expert testimony (pp. 300-318). New York: West. Mullen, P. (2000). Forensic mental health. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 307-311. Rasanen, P., Tiihonen, J., Isohanni, M. (1998). Schizophrenia, alcohol abuse and violent behaviour: A 26-year follow-up study of an unselected birth cohort. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 437-41. Salvatore, S., Gelo, O.C., Gennaro, A., Metrangolo, R., Terrone, G., Pace, V., Venuleo, C., Venezia, A., & Ciavolino, E. (2017). An automated method of content analysis for psychotherapy research: A further validation. Psychotherapy Research, 27 (1),38–50. Salvatore, S., & Valsiner, J. (2011). Idiographic science as a nonexisting object: The importance of the reality of the dynamic system. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, A. Gennaro, & J.B. Travers Simon (Eds.), YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 3) (pp. 7-26). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo. Shah, S.A. (1978). Dangerousness and Mental Ilness: Some Conceptual, Prediction and Policy Dilemmas. In C. Frederick (Ed.) Dangerous behaviour: A problem in Law and mental health (pp. 153-191). Rockville, MD: NIMH, Washington. Steadman, H. J., & Cocozza J. J. (1974). Careers of the criminally insane: Excessive social control of deviance. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, D.C. Heath. Swanson, J., Estroff, S., Swartz, M., Borum, R., Lachicotte, W., Zimmer C., & Wagner, R. (1997). Violence and severe mental disorder in clinical and community populations: the effects of psychotic symptoms, comorbidity and lack of treatment. Psychiatry, 60, 1-22. Swartz, M., Swanson, J., & Hiday, V. (1998), Violence and severe mental illness: The effects of substance abuse and nonadherence to medication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 226-231. Torrey, E. (1994). Violent behaviour by individuals with serious mental illness. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 45, 653-662. Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage. Van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Power. Houndsmills: Palgrave. Walsh, E., Buchanan, A., & Fahy, T. (2002). Violence and schizophrenia: examining the evidence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 490-495. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.