Resting behaviour of malaria vectors in a highland and a lowland site of western Kenya: Implication on malaria vector control measures
Authors: Machani Maxwell G. , Ochomo Eric , Amimo Fred , Kosgei Jackline , Munga Stephen , Zhou Guofa , Githeko Andrew K. , Yan Guiyun , Afrane Yaw A. 
Published: October 2019

AbstractBackgroundUnderstanding the interactions between increased insecticide resistance in field malaria vector populations and the subsequent resting behaviour patterns is important for planning adequate vector control measures in a specific context and sustaining the current vector interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate the resting behavior, host preference and infection with Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites by malaria vectors in different ecological settings of western Kenya with different levels of insecticide resistance.MethodsIndoor and outdoor resting Anopheline mosquitoes were sampled during the dry and rainy seasons in Kisian (lowland site) and Bungoma (highland site), both in western Kenya. WHO tube bioassay was used to determine levels of phenotypic resistance of first generation offspring (F1 progeny) of malaria vectors resting indoors and outdoors to deltamethrin. PCR-based molecular diagnostics were used for mosquito speciation, genotype for resistance mutations and to determine specific host blood meal origins. Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) was used to determine mosquito sporozoite infections.ResultsOverall, 3,566 female Anopheles mosquitoes were collected with Anopheles gambiae s.l [In Bungoma, An. gambiae s.s (90.9%), An arabiensis (7.6%) and in Kisian, An. gambiae s.s (38.9%), An. arabiensis (60.2%)] being the most abundant species (74.7%) followed by An. funestus s.l (25.3%). The majority of An. gambiae s.l (85.4 and 58%) and An. funestus (96.6 and 91.1%) were caught resting indoors in Bungoma and Kisian respectively.Vgsc-1014S was observed at a slightly higher frequency in An. gambiae s.s hereafter(An. gambiae) resting indoor than outdoor (89.7 vs 84.6% and 71.5 vs 61.1%) in Bungoma and Kisian respectively. For An. arabiensis, Vgsc-1014S was 18.2% indoor and outdoor (17.9%) in Kisian. In Bungoma, the Vgsc-1014S was only detected in An. arabiensis resting indoors with a frequency of 10%. The Vgsc-1014F mutation was only present in An. gambiae resting indoors from both sites, but at very low frequencies in Kisian compared to Bungoma (0.8 and 9.2% respectively. In Bungoma, the sporozoite rates for An. funestus, An. gambiae, and An. arabiensis resting indoors were 10.9, 7.6 and 3.4 % respectively. For outdoor resting, An. gambiae and An. arabiensis in Bungoma, the sporozoite rates were 4.7 and 2.9 % respectively.Overall, in Bungoma, the sporozoite rate for indoor resting mosquitoes was 8.6% and 4.2% for outdoors. In Kisian the sporozoite rate was 0.9% for indoor resting An. gambiae. None of the outdoor collected mosquitoes in Kisian tested positive for sporozoite infections.ConclusionThe study reports high densities of insecticide-resistant An. gambiae and An. funestus resting indoors and the persistence of malaria transmission indoors with high entomological inoculation rates (EIR) regardless of the use of Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs). These findings underline the difficulties of controlling malaria vectors resting and biting indoors using the current interventions. Supplemental vector control tools and implementation of sustainable insecticide resistance management strategies are needed in western Kenya.