Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings
Authors: Aminu Olubunmi R. , Lembo Tiziana , Zadoks Ruth N. , Biek Roman , Lewis Suzanna , Kiwelu Ireen , Mmbaga Blandina T. , Mshanga Deogratius , Shirima Gabriel , Denwood Matt , Forde Taya L. 
Published: March 2020

AbstractBackgroundAnthrax threatens human and animal health, and people’s livelihoods in many rural communities in Africa and Asia. In these areas, anthrax surveillance is challenged by a lack of tools for on-site detection. Furthermore, cultural practices and infrastructure may affect sample availability and quality. Practical yet accurate diagnostic solutions are greatly needed to quantify anthrax impacts. We validated microscopic and molecular methods for the detection ofBacillus anthracisin field-collected blood smears and identified alternative samples suitable for anthrax confirmation in the absence of blood smears.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe investigated livestock mortalities suspected to be caused by anthrax in northern Tanzania. Field-prepared blood smears (n = 152) were tested by microscopy using four staining techniques as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by Bayesian latent class analysis. Median sensitivity (91%, CI95%[84-96%]) and specificity (99%, CI95%[96-100%]) of microscopy using azure B were comparable to those of the recommended standard, polychrome methylene blue, PMB (92%, CI95%[84-97%] and 98%, CI95%[95-100%], respectively), but azure B is more available and convenient. Other commonly-used stains performed poorly. Blood smears could be obtained for <50% of suspected anthrax cases due to local customs and conditions. However, PCR on DNA extracts from dried skin, which was almost always available, had high sensitivity and specificity (95%, CI95%[90-98%] and 95%, CI95%[87-99%], respectively), even after extended storage at ambient temperature.Conclusions/SignificanceAzure B microscopy represents an accurate diagnostic test for animal anthrax that can be performed with basic laboratory infrastructure and in the field. When blood smears are unavailable, PCR using skin tissues provides a valuable alternative for confirmation. Our findings lead to a practical diagnostic approach for anthrax in low-resource settings that can support surveillance and control efforts for anthrax-endemic countries globally.Author summaryAnthrax, an ancient disease largely controlled in the developed world, is still widespread in remote and rural communities of low- and middle-income countries where it affects human and animal health, and livelihoods. To control anthrax effectively, detection and accurate confirmation are important, but solutions need to be feasible for the most-affected areas where resources and infrastructure are typically limited. To achieve this, we assessed a newly proposed stain, azure B, for microscopic confirmation on animal blood smears, as this method can be implemented in low-resource laboratories and in the field. Microscopy using azure B was highly accurate compared to other recommended stains and has the added advantage of being more readily available and convenient. However, blood smear samples were unavailable for more than half of suspected cases. We therefore evaluated a molecular test (PCR) on other sample types – whole blood, blood swabs, skin, and flies – stored at ambient temperature. We show high performance of PCR with skin tissues which were available for 90% of carcasses. Thus, under field conditions, smear samples (when available) and tissue samples are most suitable for diagnostic testing of animal anthrax, whereby microscopy can be conducted in affected areas and PCR in in-country reference laboratories.