P1135WHETHER USPD PATIENTS ARE SUITABLE FOR INCREMENTAL PERITONEAL DIALYSIS:YES OR NO?
Authors: Zhang Wenjing , LV Jia , Li Lan , Wang Zhigang , Hao Dapeng , Sun Jiping 
Published: June 2020

Abstract

Background and Aims
Incremental Peritoneal Dialysis (IPD) is the practice of initiating PD exchange less than four times a day in consideration of residual renal function (RRF). More clinical studies have confirmed the feasibility and effectiveness of IPD, especially in the protection of residual renal function, which is obviously superior to full-dose PD. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) is a popular PD method. Due to lack of pre-dialysis education, most of patients who were newly diagnosed with ESRD in China chose USPD. Well, can incremental peritoneal dialysis be used for USPD patients when starting dialysis? Compared to full-dose PD, whether incremental PD affects the residual renal function in USPD patients? Here we report the first study of incremental peritoneal dialysis’s effect on residual renal function.

Method
A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed on 169 patients who received USPD from August 2008 to March 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to dialysis dose: incremental PD(i-PD) group (dialysis dose were less than or equal to 6000ml or 3 exchanges per day) and full-dose PD(f-PD) group (dialysis dose were great than or equal to 8000ml or 4 exchanges per day). The demographics, clinical biochemical indexes, dialysis dose, urine volume, dialysis ultrafiltration volume, RRF, dialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis infection complications, mechanical complications and survival rates were compared between two groups in 1 year follow-up.
Results: (1).A total of 169 patients were enrolled, including 111 patients (average age 45.01±12.84 years) in i-PD group and 58 patients (average age 43.5±15.62 years) in f-PD group. The demographics and clinical biochemical indexes in the two groups before peritoneal dialysis were similar (P&gt;0.05). (2).During the follow-up period, the dialysis dose in f-PD group(8034.48±262.61ml/d, 8080.00±395.80ml/d, 8155.17±523.21ml/d, 8051.72±906.55ml/d) were more than those in i-PD group(5891.89±528.31ml/d, 6159.57±1185.06ml/d, 6468.47±1588.71ml/d, 6900.90±1543.05ml/d), P&lt;0.05. And the dialysis adequacy in both groups were up to standard: the total Kt/V (i-PD group: 1.96±0.56, 2.01±0.70, 2.02±0.55, 1.90±0.52; f-PD group: 2.18±0.47, 2.22±0.55, 2.05±0.44, 2.03±0.42) were greater than 1.7 and the total Ccr (i-PD group: 79.39±29.75, 79.02±25.11, 78.26±30.00, 73.09±29.14; f-PD group: 89.78±29.89, 91.54±35.56, 82.38±29.27, 72.96±23.75) were greater than 60L. (3).During the whole follow-up period, the residual renal function between two groups had no statistically significant(i-PD group: 3.96±2.52ml/min, 3.46±1.95ml/min, 3.58±2.85ml/min, 2.91±2.33ml/min; f-PD group: 4.31±4.83ml/min, 3.45±2.36ml/min, 3.16±2.15ml/min, 2.36±1.65ml/min), P&gt;0.05. (4).During the whole follow-up period, the blood pressure control, correction of anemia, and correction of calcium and phosphorus abnormalities were also similar in both groups, P&gt;0.05. (5).At 1-month and 6-month, the urine volume were higher in i-PD group(1024.33±492.91ml/d, 1017.03±571.66ml/d) than those in f-PD group(782.93±415.89ml/d, 788.27±491.02ml/d), P&lt;0.05. The dialysis ultrafiltration volume in f-PD group (481.67±723.69ml/d, 632.77±687.89ml/d, 338.87±963.14ml/d, 750.43±849.69ml/d) were higher than those in i-PD group(343.30±520.00ml/d, 495.70±916.76ml/d, 341.78±925.57ml/d, 439.65±1297.13ml/d) during the whole follow-up period, but the differences were not statistically significant (P&gt;0.05). (6).The exit-site infection, peritonitis, mechanical complications and technical survival were similar between the two groups (P&gt;0.05).

Conclusion
Incremental peritoneal dialysis will not cause rapid decline of residual renal function in USPD patients, and the dialysis effect and complications are similar to full-dose peritoneal dialysis. Therefore, we recommend that USPD patients can be treated by incremental peritoneal dialysis.