Model Rantai Pasok untuk Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia Bagian I - Bidang Pendidikan
Authors: Hidayat Syarif , Tanjung Widya Nurcahayanty , Marthayodha Cinthia Amalia , Rachmawaty Dian 
Published: November 2019

<p><em>Abstrak</em><em> </em>– <strong>P</strong><strong>engembangan model pendidikan pada manajemen rantai pasok Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia (UAI) yang mengacu pada model ITESCM</strong><strong> diharapkan mampu</strong><strong>memberikan masukan </strong><strong>dan dapat dijadikan acuan oleh </strong><strong>UAI agar dapat menghasilkan lulusan yang berkualitas</strong><strong> sesuai dengan </strong><strong>model dari pelaksanaan pendidikan dan penilaian pendidikan di UAI. Model manajemen rantai pasok pada bidang pendidikan</strong><strong> ini dibatasi </strong><strong>hanya pada proses pendidikan di UAI yang meliputi pelaksanaan dan penilaian pendidikan. </strong><strong>Terdapat delapan </strong><strong>hipotesis yang diuji</strong><strong>kan</strong><strong>, yaitu pengaruh masing-masing faktor, program <em>establishment, university culture, faculty capabilities</em>, dan <em>facilities</em> terhadap pelaksanaan dan penilaian pendidikan. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan kuesione</strong><strong>r dengan </strong><strong>jumlah sampel se</strong><strong>besar </strong><strong>100 responden yang terdiri dari 4 orang <em>strategic level</em>, 19 orang <em>planning level</em>, dan 77 orang <em>operating level</em> yang penentuannya berdasarkan proportional sampling. </strong><strong>Setelah dilakukan </strong><strong>diuji validasi dan reliabilitas</strong><strong>,</strong><strong> hasi</strong><strong>l</strong><strong> menunjukkan</strong><strong> bahwa </strong><strong>variabel penilaian dan pelaksanaan pendidikan</strong><strong> </strong><strong>valid dan reliabel</strong><strong>. <em>P</em></strong><strong><em>ath diagram</em></strong><strong> </strong><strong>untuk merumuskan model digambar dengan menggunakan <em>software</em> AMOS 18 dengan </strong><strong>input berupa hasil kuesioner dan kalkulasi <em>goodness of fit</em>. Setelah model</strong><strong> diperoleh</strong><strong>, </strong><strong>dilakukan analisis dengan </strong><strong>menggunakan <em>multiple regression linie</em></strong><strong><em>r</em></strong><strong> untuk mencari </strong><strong>hubungan</strong><strong> antar faktor</strong><strong>. </strong><strong>Berdasarkan hasil analisis,</strong><strong> model pelaksanaan pendidikan menunjukkan pengaruh yang dominan pada level strategis untuk faktor <em>university culture</em></strong><strong>. </strong><strong>Sedangkan</strong><strong> </strong><strong>model penilaian pendidikan, level perencanaan untuk faktor program <em>establishment</em> memiliki pengaruh yang dominan. Kedua model </strong><strong>kemudian </strong><strong>diuji kecocokannya dengan sistem nyata dan</strong><strong> </strong><strong>diperoleh</strong><strong> hasil </strong><strong>“<em>minimum was achieved</em>”dan p</strong><strong> </strong><strong>ratio sebesar 0,803 yang berarti kedua model ini layak</strong><strong>.</strong></p><p> </p><p><em>Abstract</em><em> – </em><strong>College education should always pay attention to the quality of its graduates. </strong><strong>This </strong><strong>researc</strong><strong>h</strong><strong> would like to develop a model of supply chain management education at the Universi</strong><strong>tas</strong><strong> Al Azhar Indonesia (UAI), which refers to the model ITESCM. This study aims to provide input UAI in order to produce quality graduates based on a model of education </strong><strong>development </strong><strong>and education assessment in UAI.</strong><strong> Eight</strong><strong> hypotheses were tested, namely the influence of each factor, programs establishment, university culture, faculty capabilities, and facilities on the development and evaluation of education.</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Data w</strong><strong>ere</strong><strong> collected through questionnaires, in which a sample of 100 respondents consisting of 4 strategic level</strong><strong>s</strong><strong>, 19 planning level</strong><strong>s</strong><strong>, and 77 operating level</strong><strong>s were</strong><strong> determination</strong><strong>ed</strong><strong> based on proportional sampling.</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Models created with AMOS 18 software with the path diagram depicting the zoom, then </strong><strong>provided</strong><strong> input in the form of a questionnaire and the results of the calculation of goodness of fit of AMOS. The results of the development model of education showed a dominant influence on the strategic level for university culture factor, whereas the assessment model of education, the level of planning for the establishment program factors have a dominant influence. Both models are tested for their suitability to the real system and the results obtained show that after calculation "minimum was </strong><strong>a</strong><strong>chieved" and amounting p</strong><strong> </strong><strong>ratio to 0,803 which means both models are viable.</strong></p><p><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><strong><em>K</em></strong><strong><em>eywords – </em></strong><em>supply chain, ITESCM, AMOS</em></p>