bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Radiotherapy to augment pembrolizumab responses and outcomes in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Pooled analysis of two randomized trials.
Authors: Welsh James William , Chen Dawei , Baas Paul , Chang Joe Y. , Verma Vivek , Comeaux Nathan , Skoulidis Ferdinandos , Lin Steven H. , Heymach John , Theelen W. 
Published: May 2020

9548 Background: In metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), the clinical trials NCT02492568 and NCT02444741 are the only known randomized comparisons of pembrolizumab alone versus pembrolizumab combined with radiation therapy (RT). When the trials were analyzed individually, some potential benefit was observed in the combination therapy group, but the relatively small sample size of each trial limited the detection of potential differences in response rates and outcomes. Hence, we perform a pooled analysis of these two randomized trials to validate and explore whether RT improves mNSCLC patient responses to immunotherapy. Methods: This was a pooled analysis of two randomized trials (NCT02492568 and NCT02444741) of pembrolizumab with or without RT for mNSCLC. Endpoints included the out-of-field overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and subgroup analysis of the different RT schemes. Results: In all, 131 patients were analyzed (n = 66 pembrolizumab; n = 65 pembrolizumab/RT (iRT)). ORR was 21% in the pembrolizumab arm vs. 38% in the iRT arm (p = 0.01); DCR was 53% in the pembrolizumab arm vs. 67% in the iRT arm (p = 0.0009); PFS was 4.4 m vs 8.3 m (p = 0.046); and OS was 9.2 m vs 19.2 m (HR 0.66; p = 0.040). Ablative RT (24Gy/3 fractions and 50Gy/4 fractions) had better ORRs of 48% and 54%, respectively, compared to 18% for non-ablative RT (45Gy/15 fractions) and 20% for pembrolizumab alone (p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: The addition of RT to immunotherapy significantly increased the ORR of unirradiated lesions and was additionally associated with significant improvements in PFS and OS. Ablative RT was associated with response rates significantly higher than those of non-ablative RT, possibly due to a detrimental effect of non-ablative RT on ALC. These hypothesis-generating findings require dedicated, large-volume, and randomized studies for corroboration. Clinical trial information: NCT02492568 and NCT02444741 .
Clinical performance of a comprehensive novel liquid biopsy test for identifying non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for treatment with osimertinib.
Authors: Gray Jhanelle Elaine , Han Ji-Youn , Telaranta-Keerie Aino , Huang Xiangning , Kohlmann Alexander , Hodge Rachel , Rukazenkov Yuri , Chmielecki Juliann , Espenschied Carin R. , Wu Yi-Long , Ramalingam Suresh S. , Barrett J Carl , Odegaard Justin Iver 
Published: May 2020

9553 Background: Genotyping is required to identify cancer patients (pts) eligible for targeted therapy; however, many do not receive biomarker testing, in part due to limitations associated with tissue-only genotyping practices and the growing list of biomarkers recommended to be tested. Liquid biopsy overcomes many of these limitations but is not yet fully adopted. We report here the clinical performance of a comprehensive liquid biopsy test based on next generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for the identification of NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 19 deletions (ex19del) or L858R mutations ( EGFRm) or EGFR T790M, eligible for treatment with osimertinib. Methods: 441 (79%) of 556 pts randomized in FLAURA (NCT02296125; first-line osimertinib vs comparator EGFR TKI in EGFRm NSCLC) and 300 (72%) of 419 pts from AURA3 (NCT012151981; osimertinib vs chemotherapy in NSCLC pts with T790M at progression on EGFR TKI) were retrospectively tested with Guardant360 (G360), a 74-gene ctDNA NGS assay assessing single nucleotide variants, insertion-deletions, amplifications, and fusions in genes relevant to targeted therapy selection as well as microsatellite instability. Progression-free survival (PFS) of pts with EGFRm or T790M detected by G360 was compared to pts detected by the cobas EGFR Mutation Test (cobas) using tissue or plasma with an unadjusted cox model. Results: Treatment with osimertinib was associated with a significant PFS benefit relative to control therapy in NSCLC pts with EGFRm (FLAURA) and T790M (AURA3) detected using G360 (Table). Observed clinical benefit for pts with EGFRm or T790M detected by G360 was similar to that for pts with EGFRm or T790M identified by cobas using tissue or plasma specimens. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates that G360 accurately identifies pts for osimertinib therapy while simultaneously providing comprehensive genotyping for other therapeutic molecular targets. The application of NGS liquid biopsy has the potential to increase rates of pts genotyped and access to precision medicine. [Table: see text]
Genetic profiling and the response to RET inhibitors in RET fusion positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) identified by international genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia).
Authors: Nosaki Kaname , Matsumoto Shingo , Yoh Kiyotaka , Ikeda Takaya , Ohe Yuichiro , Kodani Masahiro , Yanagitani Noriko , Nishino Kazumi , Shingyoji Masato , Takeuchi Shinji , Zenke Yoshitaka , Udagawa Hibiki , Kirita Keisuke , Niho Seiji , Goto Koichi 
Published: May 2020

9557 Background: RET fusions are targetable oncogenic drivers in 1 – 2 % of NSCLC, yet no RET inhibitors are approved. Selective RET inhibitors, such as LOXO-292 and BLU-667, are currently in development. The impact of co-occurring mutation on outcome in RET-TKI therapy remains largely unknown. Methods: In an international genome screening project in Asia (LC-SCRUM-Asia), 161 cancer-related genes have been analyzed by a next-generation sequencing (NGS) system, Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay. The therapeutic efficacy and survival of RET fusion+ NSCLC were evaluated using a large-scale clinicogenomic database in the LC-SCRUM-Japan. Results: From Feb 2013 to Dec 2019, a total of 7177 patients with non-squamous NSCLC were enrolled. RET fusion were detected in 167 patients (2.3 %). Median age was 61 years (range: 29 - 85), 60 % were female, 61 % were never-smokers, 99 % had adenocarcinoma, and 78 % had stage IIIB/IV disease. Based on our database, the median overall survival was 37 months. 62 patients received RET inhibitor therapy. RET fusions was identified by NGS assay (KIF5B-RET: 75, CCDC6-RET: 30, Others: 2) in 107 patients. Co-occurring genomic alterations were detected in 62 (58 %) patients, the median number of co-mutations was 1 (range 0 - 4). The most common co-occurring mutations in tumor involved TP53 (31; 29 %), STK11 (6; 6 %), CDKN2A (5; 5 %) and TSC2 (5; 5 %). In 23 patients treated with RET inhibitor (unapproved drugs), there was a strong association between co-occurring mutation and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) in RET inhibitor therapy; HR 2.75 (95%CI 1.71 - 15.6, P = 0.0096). Conclusions: RET rearrangements continue to represent a rare but high unmet need disease. Co-occurring mutation was significantly associated with shorter TTD. Our data is the largest cohort of advanced-stage RET fusion+ NSCLC profiled by NGS to date. Co-occurring mutation should be evaluated in the development of novel targeted therapies for RET fusion+ NSCLC.
Phase II randomized trial of first-line pembrolizumab and vorinostat in patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC).
Authors: Saltos Andreas Nicholas , Tanvetyanon Tawee , Creelan Ben C. , Shafique Michael Rahman , Antonia Scott Joseph , Haura Eric B. , Zheng Hong , Barlow Margaret , Saller James , Castellano-Fornelli Anna , Richards Antoine , Thapa Ram , Boyle Theresa A. , Chen Dung-Tsa , Beg Amer A , Gray Jhanelle Elaine 
Published: May 2020

9567 Background: Histone deacetylase inhibitors may enhance tumor immunogenicity through various mechanisms including induced expression of T cell chemokines. A previous phase I trial demonstrated the combination of pembrolizumab (P) with vorinostat (V) in mNSCLC was well tolerated with signals of activity in ICI-pretreated pts. We initiated a randomized trial in the first-line setting with the primary objective to determine if the combination had superior ORR compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy. Methods: Pts with treatment-naïve mNSCLC and PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% were eligible. Pts were randomized open-label 1:1 to receive P 200 mg IV q3 wk as monotherapy [Arm A] or P 200 mg IV q3 wk plus V 400 mg PO daily [Arm B]. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included DOR, PFS and OS. Tumor biopsies were collected both pre- and on-treatment (day 15-21) for analysis of CD8+ TIL, scored using a 0-3 scale in tumor beds. Here we report results after a preplanned interim analysis for efficacy, with accrual ongoing to a planned total of 39 patients per arm. Results: Between 7/2017 – 1/2019, 49 pts were enrolled, with 47 pts evaluable for response (24 in Arm A and 23 in Arm B). Median age was 69 (range 47 - 87), 49% female, ECOG PS 0/1 in 11%/89%. PD-L1 TPS was ≥50% in 13/24 (54%) of pts in Arm A, and in 13/23 (57%) of pts in Arm B. The most common TRAEs in Arm A included diarrhea (13%), fatigue (8%), and pruritus (8%). 3 pts in Arm A experienced grade ≥ 3 irAEs (including 1 each of grade 3 hepatitis, pneumonitis, and rash). The most common TRAEs in Arm B included anorexia (43%), fatigue (43%), nausea (35%) and increased creatinine (35%). 1 pt in Arm B experienced grade ≥ 3 irAE (1 grade 3 pneumonitis). Pre-treatment CD8+ TIL were not significantly different between Arm A and Arm B (p = 0.85) with the majority of tumors in both arms having a low TIL score of 1 (65% Arm A and 73.7% Arm B). A significant increase from pre-treatment to on-treatment TIL scores was seen in both Arm A (p = 0.001) and Arm B (p = 0.002). The ORR in Arm B pts with low pre-treatment TIL (score = 1) pts was substantially higher (66.7%) than in Arm A (33.3%), suggesting the combination may be especially beneficial against low TIL tumors. Conclusions: The combination arm had a considerably higher ORR compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy, with a manageable toxicity profile. The combination of pembrolizumab plus vorinostat in mNSCLC warrants further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02638090 . [Table: see text]
IMpower150: Exploratory analysis of brain metastases development.
Authors: Cappuzzo Federico , Reck Martin , Socinski Mark A. , Mok Tony S. K. , Jotte Robert M. , Finley Gene Grant , Rodriguez-Abreu Delvys , Aerts Joachim , West Howard , Nishio Makoto , Villaruz Liza C , Coleman Shelly , Lee Anthony , Vollan Hans Kristian , Yu Wei , Sufan Roxana Ioana , Bara Ilze , Barlesi Fabrice 
Published: May 2020

9587 Background: In the global phase III IMpower150 study (NCT02366143), atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) + chemo (carboplatin + paclitaxel [CP] (ABCP) showed significant improvements in PFS and OS vs BCP in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic NSCLC (Socinski et al. N Engl J Med 2018). Because bev has been shown to delay or prevent brain metastases progression in NSCLC (Fu et al. J Chemother 2016; Ilhan-Mutlu et al. Mol Can Ther 2016), exploratory analyses were conducted to assess the development of brain metastases in patients treated with ABCP, BCP and atezo + CP (ACP) in IMpower150. Methods: A total of 1202 patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive ABCP, ACP or BCP. Doses were given every 3 weeks: atezo 1200 mg, bev 15 mg/kg, carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL/min and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2. Co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS and OS in ITT–wild-type (no EGFR or ALK alterations) patients. Exploratory analyses included the rate and time to development (TTD) of new brain metastases in the ITT population, regardless of the presence of baseline brain metastases, as well as safety. Brain scans were performed as clinically indicated, and analyses were based on investigator assessments. Results: With a minimum follow-up of 32.4 months in the ITT population (data cutoff: September 13, 2019), 100 patients had developed brain metastases, with the highest rate of new brain lesions seen in the ACP (11.9%) vs the ABCP (7.0%) and BCP (6.0%) arms (table). Median TTD was not reached in any arm; a trend toward delayed TTD was seen in the ABCP vs BCP arm (HR, 0.68 [95% CI: 0.39, 1.19]). Among patients with and without brain metastases, 17 (35.4%) and 155 (44.0%) in the ACP arm, 18 (64.3%) and 207 (56.7%) in the ABCP arm and 10 (41.7%) and 183 (49.5%) in the BCP arm had Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events, respectively. Conclusions: The ACP arm had the highest rate of new brain lesions, whereas the ABCP and BCP arms had similar, lower rates. Taken together with the trend toward delayed development of new brain lesions with ABCP, the data suggest that adding atezo to BCP may not reduce the rate of new brain lesion development but may delay the time to new lesion development. No new safety signals were observed in this exploratory analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT02366143 . [Table: see text]
Therapeutic impact of mutation subtypes and concomitant STK11 mutations in KRAS–mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A result of nationwide genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Japan).
Authors: Tamiya Yutaro , Zenke Yoshitaka , Matsumoto Shingo , Furuya Naoki , Sakamoto Tomohiro , Kato Terufumi , Nishino Kazumi , Shingyoji Masato , Miyamoto Shingo , Shirakawa Chigusa , Toyozawa Ryo , Ohashi Kadoaki , Ikeda Takaya , Nosaki Kaname , Udagawa Hibiki , Kirita Keisuke , Yoh Kiyotaka , Niho Seiji , Goto Koichi 
Published: May 2020

9589 Background: KRAS mutations are one of the common oncogene drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the development of several targeted drugs for KRAS-mutated NSCLC is now ongoing. However, the clinical impact of KRAS mutation subtypes or concomitant other gene mutations in NSCLC patients (pts) remains unclear. Methods: In a nationwide genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Japan), we have prospectively analyzed lung cancer pts for genetic alterations and tumor mutation burden (TMB) by next-generation sequencing system, and for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry (22C3 antibody). The therapeutic efficacy and survival of KRAS-mutated non-squamous (non-sq) NSCLC pts were evaluated using a clinico-genomic database of the LC-SCRUM-Japan. Results: A total of 5166 non-sq NSCLC pts enrolled from 2015 to 2019. KRAS mutations were detected in 794 pts (15%; G12C/G12D/G12V/G12A/G13X/others = 232/186/165/66/61/84). Among the 794 pts, TMB and PD-L1 expression were analyzed in 128 and 79, respectively, and 218 received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (IO) after 1st-line chemotherapy. The median age was 66 years (range, 29-89). 142 pts (65%) were male and 172 (78%) were smokers. Concomitant STK11 mutations were detected in 33 pts (15%) with no difference in the mutation frequency among KRAS mutation subtypes. KRAS G12C was significantly associated with high TMB (≥ 10 mut/Mb) (p = 0.03), and KRAS G12C or G12V with high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50%) (p = 0.02). In pts who received IO, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was significantly longer in pts with KRAS G12C or G12V than in those with other KRAS mutations (4.7 vs 2.0 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.58 [95%CI 0.43-0.78], p < 0.01). Among pts with KRAS G12C or G12V, mPFS of IO was significantly shorter in pts with concomitant STK11 mutations than in those without (1.8 vs. 5.7 months, HR 1.97 [95%CI 1.06-3.41], p = 0.02). These correlations were not observed in platinum-containing chemotherapy (Plt-CTx). There were also no significant differences in IO and Plt-CTx efficacies between with and without other concomitant mutations, such as TP53, RB1, CDKN2A and PTEN mutations. Conclusions: Non-sq NSCLC pts with KRAS G12C/V were more sensitive to IO therapies than those with other KRAS mutations, but KRAS G12C/V-positive pts with concomitant STK11 mutations were less sensitive than those without. These results could be highly informative in the development of novel targeted therapies for KRAS-mutated NSCLC.
Updated overall survival (OS) and genomic analysis from a single-arm phase II study of dabrafenib (D) + trametinib (T) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E mutant (Mut) metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Authors: Planchard David , Besse Benjamin , Groen Harry , Hashemi Sayed MS , Mazieres Julien , Kim Tae Min , Quoix Elisabeth A. , Souquet Pierre Jean , Barlesi Fabrice , Baik Christina S , Villaruz Liza C , Kelly Ronan Joseph , Zhang Shirong , Tan Monique , Gasal Eduard , Santarpia Libero , Johnson Bruce E. 
Published: May 2020

9593 Background: The phase II multicenter, open label study, which evaluated efficacy and safety of D+T in pretreated (cohort B) and treatment (tx)-naive (cohort C) pts with BRAF V600E mut metastatic NSCLC. The results of the primary analysis have been reported. Here, we present an updated survival and genomic analysis data for cohorts B and C. Methods: Tx-naïve (n=36) and pretreated (n=57) pts received D 150 mg twice daily + T 2 mg daily. Primary objective: ORR, secondary objectives: PFS, DOR, OS, safety, tolerability and PK of D+T. Tumor samples were centrally tested using a NGS cancer targeted panel (Oncomine Dx Target test, ThermoFisher Scientific). KM curves and Cox regression models were used to evaluate potential associations between baseline genomic landscape and pt efficacy endpoints. Results: As of June 22, 2019, median (m) follow-up was 16.3 mo in tx-naïve pts and 16.6 mo in pretreated pts. mOS was 17.3 mo (95% CI: 12.3, 40.2; 3 yr OS: 40%) and 18.2 mo (95% CI: 14.3, 28.6; 3 yr OS: 33%) with 14/36 and 11/57 pts alive in tx naïve and pretreated pts respectively. Detailed efficacy results are presented in table. 57/62 tumor samples retrieved from 93 pts were centrally confirmed to have BRAF V600E mut; 5 non-confirmed BRAF tumors (3 pts had PR) were positive for c-MET T1010I, KRAS G12V, ALK fusion and 2 JAK3 S493C with mPFS of 13.8 mo while OS was NE due to limited data points. Eleven pts (18%) had concomitant somatic mutations and/or genetic alterations in addition to BRAF V600E mut: 4 had alterations within PI3K pathway4 had concomitant mutations at IDH1 R132X, and 3 pts had additional mutations at BRAF G466V, KRAS G13C and a cMET exon 14 skipping, respectively. Pts whose tumors had concomitant genetic alterations, particularly in PI3K pathway, showed a trend towards decreased PFS and OS. Safety profile was similar to previous reported results. Conclusions: This update of BRF113928 study reported improved and durable OS rates with combination D+T in BRAF V600E mut NSCLC pts. Co-occurring genetic alterations might influence clinical outcomes of such pts. Further validation is ongoing to corroborate current genomic findings. Clinical trial information: NCT01336634 . [Table: see text]
A phase II study of lorlatinib in patients (pts) with ALK-positive (ALK+) lung cancer with brain-only progression.
Authors: Dagogo-Jack Ibiayi , Oxnard Geoffrey R. , Fink Jessica , Diubaldi Gianluca , Helms Caitlyn , Gainor Justin F. , Rabin Michael S. , Heist Rebecca Suk , Lin Jessica Jiyeong , Ackil Jennifer , Muzikansky Alona , Shaw Alice Tsang 
Published: May 2020

9595 Background: Lorlatinib is a 3rd-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed to penetrate the central nervous system (CNS) and overcome resistance to 2nd-generation (2nd-gen) ALK TKIs. In a phase II study, lorlatinib demonstrated significant intracranial (IC) activity after failure of 2nd-gen TKIs. As treatment discontinuation for extracranial (EC) progression can confound assessment of durability of IC response, we performed a phase II study (NCT02927340) to selectively evaluate lorlatinib activity in ALK+ pts with CNS-only disease. Methods: Between 11/2016 and 1/2019, 22 pts with IC progression on an ALK TKI with no other sites of measurable disease were enrolled at 2 institutions. Pts received lorlatinib at a starting dose of 100 mg QD. The primary endpoint was the IC disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks per modified RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints were IC objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Of the 22 pts enrolled, 21 (95%) had progressed on a 2nd-gen ALK TKI and 14 (64%) had previously received CNS radiation (median 21.1 months between radiation and lorlatinib). Median number of prior ALK TKIs was 2 (range 1-4). As of the data cutoff of 12/15/19, median follow-up was 14 months. At 12 weeks, the IC-DCR was 95%, including 8 pts with stable disease. Best IC ORR was 59% with 6 complete and 7 partial responses. Nine (41%) pts relapsed on study, including 3 IC-only, 5 EC-only, and 1 combined relapse. Four pts continued treatment beyond EC-only progression. Although median IC DOR and PFS were not estimable due to few progression events, the IC progression-free rate at 12 months was 81% (95% CI: 53%-94%). Twelve pts have discontinued study treatment due to progression (n = 6), edema (n = 1), pulmonary hypertension (n = 1), or transition to commercial lorlatinib (n = 4). Conclusions: Lorlatinib induces durable intracranial responses in pts with CNS-only progression on 2nd-gen ALK TKIs, suggesting that CNS-specific relapses are primarily driven by ALK-dependent mechanisms. Further studies are needed to characterize the molecular basis of sensitivity to lorlatinib in this unique subgroup of pts with ALK+ lung cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02927340 .
Nintedanib + docetaxel in lung adenocarcinoma patients (pts) following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): Updated efficacy and safety results of the ongoing non-interventional study (NIS) VARGADO (NCT02392455).
Authors: Grohé Christian , Blau Wolfgang , Gleiber Wolfgang , Haas Siegfried , Krüger Stefan , Mueller-Huesmann Harald , Schulze Mathias , Atz Judith , Kaiser Rolf 
Published: May 2020

9604 Background: Nintedanib (Vargatef) is an oral triple angiokinase inhibitor targeting VEGF-, PDGF- and FGF receptor pathways. It is approved in the EU and other countries in combination with docetaxel for treatment of locally advanced, metastatic or locally recurrent NSCLC of adenocarcinoma histology after 1st line chemotherapy. ICI +/- chemotherapy has changed the standard of care for 1st line treatment of metastatic non-mutated NSCLC. However, currently, only limited clinical data are available to help guide treatment decisions after prior ICI therapy in subsequent lines. Methods: This updated analysis is part of the ongoing NIS VARGADO (cohort B), a prospective non-interventional study of nintedanib + docetaxel after 1st line chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma NSCLC. The analysis includes 57 pts who had previously received both chemotherapy and ICI treatment. Results: Median age was 61 years (range: 45 – 80), 32/57 pts (56.1%) were men, and 41/57 pts (71.9%) were ECOG PS 0/1. 12/57 pts (21.1%) had brain metastases, and 46/57 pts (80.7 %) were current or former smokers. 1st line chemotherapy treatments included pemetrexed (36/57 pts, 63.2%), cisplatin (29/57 pts, 50.9%), carboplatin (33/57 pts, 57.9%), bevacizumab (14/57 pts, 24.6%), vinorelbine (13/57 pts, 22.8%), paclitaxel (8/57 pts, 14.0%), and docetaxel (1/57 pts, 1.8%). 2nd line treatments included nivolumab (34/57 pts, 59.7%), pembrolizumab (14/57 pts, 24.6%), and atezolizumab (7/57 pts, 12.3%). Under nintedanib and docetaxel, ORR was 50% (20/40 pts); DCR was 85.0% (34/40 pts). Median PFS was 6.5 months (95%CI 4.8 – 8.7), median OS was 12.4 months (95%CI 11.4 – 14.1). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) grade ≥3, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation were observed in 30/57 pts (52.6%), 30/57 pts (52.6%), and 17/57 pts (29.8%), respectively. Conclusions: This updated analysis of the VARGADO study continues to show the clinical benefit and manageable safety profile of nintedanib plus docetaxel in patients who had previously received both chemotherapy and ICI treatment. These data add to the real-world evidence that can inform clinical decision-making after prior ICI therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02392455 .