bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025_split huggingface dataset:
Selinexor, daratumumab, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM).
Authors: Gasparetto Cristina , Lentzsch Suzanne , Schiller Gary J. , Callander Natalie Scott , Tuchman Sascha , Bahlis Nizar J. , White Darrell , Chen Christine , Baljevic Muhamed , Sutherland Heather J , Kotb Rami , Sebag Michael , LeBlanc Richard , Venner Christopher P , Bensinger William , Rossi Adriana C. , Sheehan Heidi , Arazy Melina , Kai Kazuharu , Lipe Brea 
Published: May 2020

8510 Background: Selinexor is a first-in-class oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates exportin 1 (XPO1). Selinexor in combination with low dose dexamethasone (Sel-dex) was approved by the FDA, based on data from the STORM study, wherein Sel-dex induced an overall response rate (ORR) of 26.2% in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Single agent daratumumab has demonstrated an ORR of 29% in MM reftactory to proteasome inhibitors (PIs)/immunomodulatory drug (IMiDs). We evaluated the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the combination of Sel-dex and daratumumab (SDd) in pts with MM refractory to PIs/IMiDs. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b/2 dose escalation and expansion study. Pts were eligible if they had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, including a PI and an IMiD, or whose MM was refractory to a PI and an IMiD. In the expansion phase, pts were required to be anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-naïve. One dose level was tested at each schedule: selinexor once-weekly (QW at 100 mg) or twice-weekly (BIW at 60 mg) with dexamethasone 40 mg. Daratumumab 16 mg/kg IV was administered per label. Primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and assess safety, tolerability and efficacy of SDd in pts with RRMM. Results: A total of 34 pts were enrolled; 3 in the 60 mg BIW and 31 in the 100 mg QW cohorts. Median age was 69 and median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (range, 1–10). Out of 34 pts, 62% and 65% were refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide respectively. Common treatment related adverse events (all grades, grades 3/4) included: thrombocytopenia (71%, 47%), fatigue (62%, 18%), nausea (71%, 9%), anemia (62%, 32%) and neutropenia (50%, 26%). Two dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported in the 60 mg BIW cohort: Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and Grade 2 fatigue requiring dose reduction in selinexor to 100 mg QW. In the 100 mg QW escalation cohort (n = 6), no DLTs occured. 32 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 73% (11 VGPR, 11 PR) for 30 daratumumab-naïve pts. Median progression-free survival was 12.5 months in both groups. Conclusions: Based on tolerability and efficacy, the RP2D of SDd is selinexor 100 mg, daratumumab 16 mg/kg and dexamethasone 40 mg, administered QW. In pts with PI and IMiD refractory MM, weekly SDd demonstrated promising activity with an ORR of 73% in daratumumab-naïve pts and a median PFS of 12.5 months. This supports further development of a novel non-PI, non-IMiD backbone in earlier lines of therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02343042 .
Will adding alkylating agent to bortezomib improve survival of newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients?
Authors: Zhang Yumeng , Duncanson Lauren , Nishihori Taiga , Hansen Doris K. , Ochoa-Bayona Jose L. , Liu Hien D , Baz Rachid C. , Blue Brandon Jamaal 
Published: May 2020

8517 Background: The combination of bortezomib (Bort) and alkylating agent (AA) is a frequently used first-line therapy for AL amyloidosis. Kastritis et al. compared melphalan and dexamethasone with or without bortezomib as primary therapy and demonstrated increased hematologic response rate with the bortezomib and melphalan combination. However, the role of AA is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate if adding AA to Bort improved patient outcomes in AL amyloidosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data on 209 patients with systemic AL Amyloidosis at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2008 and 2020. We excluded patients with localized amyloidosis or amyloid other than AL. Patients were divided into two groups based on upfront therapy: A) Bort and B) Bort + AA. All patients also received dexamethasone. The staging was per Mayo 2012. Organ involvement, response, and progression were defined based on the 2005 criteria. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from initial diagnosis until death or last contact. Time to next therapy (TTNT) was calculated in patients with the documented hematologic response from the time of initiation of therapy to time of the next therapy/last follow up/death. Results: Of 209 patients, 36% (n=76) received Bort+AA; 30% (n=62) received Bort. No significant difference in clinical characteristics was seen in both groups except for age (which was higher for arm A: median 65 and 62 years, respectively, p=0.043) (table). In addition, Bort+AA became more commonly used as a frontline therapy after 1/1/2014 (p=0.001). Group A and B had similar median OS (69.9 months [95% CI. 44.7-95.2] and 64.4 mo [95% CI 40.5-88.3] respectively, p=0.60). 86% of patients in group B achieved a hematologic response as compared to 74% of patients in group A (p=0.15). Similarly, 47% of patients in group B achieved an organ response as compared to 34% of patients in group A (p=0.22). TTNT was higher in group A than group B (16.9 mo [95% CI, 0-41.5] and 7.8 mo [95% CI, 3.5-12.0], respectively, p=0.08). Conclusions: While Bort+AA is a commonly used regimen for amyloidosis, the addition of AA to Bort did not result in superior OS, TTNT compared to Bort alone in this retrospective study. This finding should be confirmed in prospective studies. Baseline Characteristics. [Table: see text]
Prospective evaluation of spatial heterogeneity at single cell resolution in multiple myeloma.
Authors: Merz Maximilian , Merz Almuth Maria Anni , Wang Jie , Wei Lei , Hu Qiang , Belal Ahmed , Alberico Ronald , Block Anne Marie W. , Herr Megan , Hahn Theresa , Wallace Paul K , Tario Joseph , Luce Jesse , Glenn Sean , Singh Prashant , Liu Song , McCarthy Philip L. , Hillengass Jens 
Published: May 2020

8524 Background: Osteolytic lesions (OL) characterize symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). It is still unclear why plasma cells (PC) cause OL in certain regions of the body while other areas show no signs of bone destruction despite significant bone marrow infiltration. We conducted the first study of single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) of PC obtained from random bone marrow samples (RS) and paired OL. Methods: As part of a prospective clinical trial, patients consented to an imaging-guided biopsy of new OL identified by PET/CT in addition to the RS from the iliac crest. Both samples were acquired in the same session. On the same day PC were isolated using a CD138 positive selection kit and single cell gene expression libraries were generated for scRNA-seq. Frozen PC were subjected to DNA extraction and WES. Results: We sequenced 93569 purified, viable PC from paired samples from 15 different locations in the first 7 consecutive patients (median PC from location: 7203; range 1121-10279). Quality assessment of scRNA-seq data revealed no differences between PC in OL and RS. Based on scRNA-seq, 9-24 different subpopulations of PC in individual patients were identified. Over 90% of clusters found in the RS were also present in corresponding OL suggesting a common ancestor. This was true for patients with overlapping as well as divergent mutational profiles in RS and OL as shown by WES. In each patient we found PC clusters that were predominantly present in OL. Respective clusters were characterized by expression of Wnt-signaling inhibitors like DKK-1, Frzb and sFRP-2 and other genes linked to MM bone disease (HGF, CXCL-12, CCL3). Lysosome-associated membrane protein-like molecule 5 (LAMP5) and J-chain were overexpressed in OL clusters. Analysis of genes (IKZF1 and IKZF3) associated with response to treatment and outcome revealed vast heterogeneity and differences in risk scores (UAMS70 and IFM15) on a single cell level from different locations in individual patients. Conclusions: Our study provides the first evidence that PC from OL have distinct transcriptomic profiles that link site-specific gene expression to development of bone disease and adverse outcome.
Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and next generation sequencing (NGS) for minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation: Results of the FORTE trial in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM).
Authors: Oliva Stefania , Genuardi Elisa , Belotti Angelo , Frascione Pio Manlio Mirko , Galli Monica , Capra Andrea , Offidani Massimo , Vozella Federico , Zambello Renato , Auclair Daniel , Kirsch Ilan , Ruggeri Marina , Jacob Allison , Ledda Antonio , Corradini Paolo , Gilestro Milena , Zamagni Elena , Musto Pellegrino , Boccadoro Mario , Gay Francesca 
Published: May 2020

8533 Background: The role of MRD by MFC and NGS is well known in MM, with few data on the concordance of the two techniques. We analyzed and compared MRD data from the FORTE trial both by MFC and NGS. Methods: Newly diagnosed MM patients (pts) ≤65 years were randomized to: carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (KRd) induction-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) - KRd consolidation (KRd_ASCT); 12 KRd cycles (KRd12); carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone (KCd) induction-ASCT-KCd consolidation (KCd_ASCT). Pts were then randomized to maintenance: lenalidomide alone or plus carfilzomib. MRD was assessed by 8-color second generation flow cytometry (sensitivity 10−5) in pts with ≥very good partial response (VGPR) before maintenance. In a subgroup of these pts, next generation flow (NGF; sensitivity 10−5-10−6) was performed. In ≥CR pts, MRD pre-maintenance was also assessed by NGS (Adaptive Biotechnologies; sensitivity 10−5-10−6). Thus, both MFC and NGS evaluations were available only in ≥CR pts. 1-year sustained MRD negativity by MFC and NGS was also analyzed in pts with at least one sample available at least 1 year apart. Results: MFC and NGS data were available in 184/233 (79%) CR pts (66 KRd_ASCT, 67 KRd12 and 51 KCd_ASCT). Median age of this ≥CR population was 57 years (IQR 52-62), 13% had International Staging System (ISS) III and 27% high risk cytogenetics by FISH [either del(17p) or t(4;14) or t(14;16)]. Table reports MRD negativity rate by MFC and NGS at a cut-off of 10−5 and 10−6 among ≥CR negative pts in the 3 arms. NGS negativity at a cut-off 10−6 was found in 36/133 (27%) ≥CR pts (for 51/184 CR pts 10−6 sensitivity was not reached). In evaluable pts, 1-year sustained 10−5 MRD negativity by MFC and NGS was superimposable (83%). We evaluated concordance of MRD results by the two techniques and observed agreement was 86% for MFC and NGS at 10−5 evaluable samples (n: 335; r: 0.61) and 78% for MFC and NGS at 10−6 evaluable samples (n: 56; r: 0.77). Conclusions: In pts who achieved ≥CR, similar rate of pre-maintenance 10−5 negativity by MFC and NGS has been reached in each arm, with 83% pts maintaining 1-year MFC or NGS 10−5 sustained MRD negativity. Concordance between MFC and NGS was good, particularly when the same sensitivity was reached. Longer follow up is needed to draw definitive conclusions. Clinical trial information: NCT02203643 . [Table: see text]
Corticosteriod tapering in patients (Pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving subcutaneous daratumumab (DARA SC): Part 3 of the open-label, multicenter, phase Ib PAVO Study.
Authors: Nahi Hareth , Usmani Saad Zafar , Mateos Maria-Victoria , van de Donk Niels W.C.J. , Moreau Philippe , Oriol Albert , Plesner Torben , Yang Shiyi , Hellemans Peter , Tromp Brenda J. , Luo Man (Melody) , Zemlickis Donna , Farnsworth Andrew , Chari Ajai 
Published: May 2020

8537 Background: Intravenous DARA (DARA IV) is approved for the treatment of MM. In Part 2 of PAVO, DARA SC, a concentrated, pre-mixed SC co-formulation of DARA and recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20), was well tolerated, with a low infusion-related reaction (IRR) rate, and showed consistent serum concentrations and similar efficacy to DARA IV in RRMM pts. In PAVO Part 3, we evaluated the safety of pre- and post-dose corticosteroid tapering during DARA SC administration. Methods: RRMM pts with ≥2 prior lines of treatment, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), received DARA SC (DARA 1,800 mg + rHuPH20 30,000 U in 15 mL) by manual SC injection per approved IV monotherapy dosing schedule. Pts received a 3-week (wk) tapering schedule (corticosteroid-free by Cycle [C] 1 Day [D] 22), with methylprednisolone (MP) given PO/IV pre-dose (C1D1, 100 mg; C1D8, 60 mg; C1D15, 30 mg) and PO post-dose (C1D1, 20 mg for 2 days; C1D8, 20 mg for 1 day; C1D15, 20 mg for 1 day), or a 2-wk tapering schedule (corticosteroid-free by C1D15), with MP given PO/IV pre-dose (C1D1, 100 mg; C1D8, 60 mg) and PO post-dose (C1D1, 20 mg for 2 days; C1D8, 20 mg for 1 day). Results: Pts (3-wk group, n = 15; 2-wk group, n = 15) received a median of 2 (range: 2-7) prior lines of therapy, with 37% refractory to a PI and an IMiD. The 3-wk and 2-wk groups received a median (range) of 14 (2-19+) and 8 (2-16+) DARA SC doses without corticosteroids, respectively. No IRRs were reported in the 3-wk group. 3 pts (20%) in the 2-wk group experienced IRRs on C1D1 (grade 3 hypertension, grade 2 chills, grade 1 pyrexia, grade 1 oropharyngeal pain, and grade 1 tachycardia). IRRs occurred within 2 h of the first DARA SC administration; no IRRs were reported at later administrations. Most common (≥25%) treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were upper respiratory tract infection (40%) and fatigue and nausea (27% each). Most common (≥5%) grade 3/4 TEAEs were anaemia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, and hypertension (7% each). At median follow-up of 6.8 mo (3-wk group) and 2.4 mo (2-wk group), the overall response rates were 40% (95% CI, 16-68%) and 27% (95% CI, 8-55%) and ≥very good partial response rates were 13% (95% CI, 2-40%) and 7% (95% CI, 0-32%), respectively. Conclusions: Rapid corticosteroid tapering over 2 wks is safe in RRMM pts receiving DARA SC. These data help guide future DARA SC combinations (ie, T-cell redirectors, CAR-T, or checkpoint inhibitors), where limiting concurrent corticosteroids may be preferred. Clinical trial information: NCT02519452 .
Ixazomib-dexamethasone (Ixa-Dex) vs physician’s choice (PC) in relapsed/refractory (RR) primary systemic AL amyloidosis (AL) patients (pts) by prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) exposure in the phase III TOURMALINE-AL1 trial.
Authors: Kastritis Efstathios , Dispenzieri Angela , Wechalekar Ashutosh D. , Schönland Stefan O. , Kim Kihyun , Sanchorawala Vaishali , Landau Heather Jolie , Kwok Fiona , Suzuki Kenshi , Comenzo Ray , Palladini Giovanni , Berg Deborah , Liu Guohui , Kumar Arun , Faller Douglas V. , Merlini Giampaolo 
Published: May 2020

8546 Background: The PI bortezomib is commonly used in first-line therapy of AL, but new therapies are needed that are tolerable in the context of multi-organ dysfunction and that, in RRAL, offer improved outcomes following prior bortezomib. Ixazomib is an oral PI, and in TOURMALINE-AL1, the first phase 3 trial conducted in RRAL, while the first primary endpoint of hematologic overall response rate (ORR) was not met, all clinically relevant time-to-event endpoint data favored Ixa-Dex vs PC (Dispenzieri et al, ASH 2019). Methods: RRAL pts with 1–2 prior therapies were randomized (1:1) to Ixa-Dex (n = 85) or PC (n = 83; Dex plus lenalidomide [n = 47], melphalan [n = 24], cyclophosphamide [n = 10], or thalidomide [n = 2]), stratified by cardiac stage, relapsed vs refractory disease, and prior PI exposure. The primary endpoints were hematologic ORR and 2-yr rate of vital organ deterioration or death. We report subgroup analyses of ORR and outcomes by prior PI exposure. Results: Of the 168 pts enrolled, 90 were PI-naïve and 78 PI-exposed (46 and 39 in the Ixa-Dex arm; 44 and 39 in the PC arm) per stratification; 28 and 27 pts in the Ixa-Dex and PC arms had received bortezomib in their last prior line. Hematologic ORR was 63% vs 50% for Ixa-Dex vs PC (odds ratio [OR] 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–3.96) in PI-naïve pts, and 41% vs 51% (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.27–1.62) in PI-exposed pts. For time-to-event outcomes (Table), hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.46–0.85 in favor of Ixa-Dex vs PC in both PI-naïve and PI-exposed pts. Conclusions: Hematologic ORR was higher with Ixa-Dex vs PC in PI-naïve pts but lower in PI-exposed pts (although not statistically significant), and long-term clinically relevant outcomes favored Ixa-Dex in both groups. Based on HRs, the magnitude of benefit appeared similar or greater in PI-naïve vs PI-exposed pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01659658 . [Table: see text]
Randomized phase II trial comparing the efficacy of standard-dose with high-dose twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in limited disease small-cell lung cancer (LD SCLC).
Authors: Gronberg Bjorn Henning , Killingberg Kristin Toftaker , Fløtten Øystein , Bjaanæs Maria Moksnes , Madebo Tesfaye , Langer Seppo , Schytte Tine , Brustugun Odd Terje , Nyman Jan , Stokke Kristin , Halvorsen Tarje Onsøien 
Published: May 2020

9007 Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment of LD SCLC. Some patients are cured, but most relapse and better treatment is needed. 45 Gy in 30 fractions BID is the most recommended TRT-schedule. Studies suggest that a higher TRT-dose might prolong survival, but hitherto, this has not been confirmed in randomized trials. We aimed to investigate whether high-dose BID TRT of 60 Gy in 40 fractions was feasible, tolerated, and improved survival. Methods: Patients > 18 years, performance status (PS) 0-2 and confirmed LD SCLC were to receive 4 courses of platinum/etoposide and were randomized to BID TRT of 60 or 45 Gy. Responders were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation of 25-30 Gy. Primary endpoint was 2-year survival; secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). To demonstrate a 25% improvement of 2-year survival from 53% to 66% with a one-sided α = .10 and β = .80, 75 patients were required on each arm. Results: Between 2014-2018, 176 patients were enrolled at 22 Scandinavian hospitals. 160 completed TRT per protocol and were eligible for the present analyses (60 Gy: n = 84, 45 Gy: n = 76). Median age was 65, 58% women, 90% PS 0-1. There were no significant differences in grade 3–4 esophagitis (60 Gy: 19%, 45 Gy: 18%, p = .92) or grade 3–4 pneumonitis (60 Gy: 4%, 45 Gy: 0%, p = .10). There was a trend towards more neutropenic infections on the 45 Gy arm (60 Gy: 21%, 45 Gy: 36%, p = .05). There were no significant differences in other grade 3-4 toxicity. Three patients died during the study treatment period (60 Gy: one neutropenic infection and one aortic dissection; 45 Gy: one thrombocytopenic bleeding). There were no statistically significant differences in response rates (60 Gy: 88% [95% CI 81-95], 45 Gy: 85% [95% CI 76-93], p = .52) or median PFS (60 Gy: 20 months [95% CI 11-29], 45 Gy: 14 months [95% CI 10-19], p = .31). Significantly more patients on the 60 Gy arm were alive after 2 years (60 Gy: 73% [95% CI 63-83], 45 Gy: 46% [95% CI 36-60], p = .001), and they had a significantly longer median overall survival (60 Gy: 42 months [95% CI 32-51], 45 Gy: 23 months [95% CI 17-28], HR .63 [95% CI .41-.96], p = .031). Conclusions: LD SCLC patients who received BID TRT of 60 Gy had a statistically significant and numerically substantial benefit in terms of 2-year survival (primary endpoint) and median overall survival compared with those who received BID TRT of 45 Gy. The higher TRT dose did not cause more toxicity than the standard dose. Clinical trial information: NCT02041845.
The anti-disialoganglioside (GD2) antibody dinutuximab (D) for second-line treatment (2LT) of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer (RR SCLC): Results from part II of the open-label, randomized, phase II/III distinct study.
Authors: Edelman Martin , Dvorkin Mikhail , Laktionov Konstantin K. , Navarro Alejandro , Juan-Vidal Oscar , Kozlov Vadim , Golden Gil , Jordan Odette , Deng CQ 
Published: May 2020

9017 Background: Although SCLC is highly responsive to initial therapy, most pts relapse < 1 y. Topotecan (T) and irinotecan (I) are used in 2LT of SCLC; however, treatment response is low: ≤10-25% and median survival is ~4-5 months. Preclinical studies support GD2 as an SCLC target. This study evaluated the combination of D+I vs. I alone or T alone in 2LT of SCLC pts. Methods: Pts with RR SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1, were randomized 2:2:1 to receive D 16-17.5 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) plus I 350 mg/m2 IV (Day 1 q21d), I 350 mg/m2 IV (Day 1 q21d), or T 1.5 mg/m2 IV (Days 1-5 q21d). Randomization was stratified by duration of response to prior platinum therapy. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in pts treated with D+I vs. I alone and was analyzed using stratified log-rank test and COX regression. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate, ORR + stable disease (CBR). Safety was assessed. Results: 471 pts were randomized to D+I (n = 187), I (n = 190), or T (n = 94). Baseline characteristics were balanced (24.2% women; mean ± SD age 61.6 ± 8.7 y). Median OS was similar in pts receiving D+I (6.9 [3.5,10.9] months) vs. I alone (7 [3.6,13.1] months) (HR [95% CI]: 1.12 [0.9,1.4]; P = 0.3132) or T alone (7.4 [3.8,12.8] months) (HR [95% CI]: 1.05 [0.8,1.37]; P = 0.7233). Median PFS was similar in pts receiving D+I (3.5 [1.5,6.2] months) vs. I (3 [1.4,5.7] months) or T (3.4 [1.6, 6.1] months) alone. ORR was similar in pts receiving D+I (17.1%) vs. I (18.9%) or T (20.1%) alone. CBR was similar in pts receiving D+I (67.4%) vs. I (58.9%) or T (68.1%) alone. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were experienced by 77% D+I, 69.5% I, and 86.4% T pts. Conclusions: Treatment with D+I was not superior to established 2LT for RR SCLC. Exploratory analyses are ongoing to evaluate GD2 expression in circulating tumor cells, select protein biomarkers, and any correlative impact on observed response. Clinical trial information: NCT03098030.