ADAPTATION, CONSTRAINT, AND COMPROMISE IN AVIAN POSTNATAL DEVELOPMENT
Authors: RICKLEFS ROBERT E. 
Published: January 2008

1. This paper discusses factors that influence the evolution of growth rate and determine its variation among species of birds. Growth rate is related to evolutionary fitness through the use of time, energy, and nutrients. In addition, balances between factors favouring rapid growth and those favouring slow growth may be investigated directly by experiment and by comparative observation.

2. David Lack (1968) proposed that the growth rate of the young is the optimum balance between selection for rapid growth to reduce the vulnerable period of development and selection for slow growth to reduce the energy requirements of the young.

3. To test Lack's hypothesis, the growth rates of birds, estimated by fitting sigmoid equations to curves relating weight to age, were surveyed widely from the literature. Among all species examined, growth rate was inversely related to adult weight. Among birds of similar size, most variation in growth rate was related to the degree of maturity of the neonate. Altricial chicks, which depend upon their parents for food and warmth, grow more rapidly than precocial chicks, which are self‐sufficient shortly after hatching. Lack's hypothesis, which predicts a direct relationship between growth rate and mortality rate, was not supported.

4. I propose that the key to understanding variation in growth rate among birds lies in the balance between rate of cell proliferation or cell growth, on one hand, and acquisition of mature function, on the other. This idea is consistent with principles of cellular and developmental biology. It is supported by comparisons of (a) the neonates of different species, (b) the individual over the course of the developmental period, and (c) tissues whose use is acquired at different stages of development, wherein more mature individuals or tissues grow more slowly than those with less developed function.

5. Species of birds that are classified as semi‐precocial develop precocially but grow rapidly. Although these seemingly violate the general rule relating growth rate to precocity, a closer inspection of their development reveals that they too support the rule. In the Common Tern, the legs, which are the key organ in precocial development, grow at the expected slow rate. The body as a whole grows rapidly because the growth increment of the legs is small and their growth is completed quickly.

6. Growth rates of precocial birds do not decrease abruptly at hatching. This points more to gradual tissue differentiation than to the pattern of procurement and allocation of energy as the primary control for growth rate.

7. Precocious development is favoured when the chicks are capable of self‐feeding or when food supplies are distant from the next site and travelling time between one and the other is long. Precocity of the neonates frees both parents to feed at a distant food source.

8. Some species having diets with low levels of protein or other nutrients may grow slowly in order to match nutrient requirements to their availability in the diet. This pattern is indicated especially among the Procellariiformes, which feed an oily diet to their young, and also among tropical fruit‐eating birds.

9. Some tropical, pelagically‐feeding sea‐birds that rear only one offspring at a time may not be able to procure food sufficient to support rapid chick growth. Alternative explanations for slow growth among these species include difficulty in obtaining essential nutrients and more precocious development of activity than in related species having more rapid growth.