What Is the Likelihood of Union After Coronal Limb Realignment Using Revision Osteosynthesis and Concurrent TKA in Patients with Advanced Arthritis and Loss of Fixation After Distal Metaphyseal Femur Fractures?
Authors: Gavaskar Ashok S. , Srinivasan Parthasarathy , Raj Rufus V. , Jayakumar Balamurugan , Pattabiraman Kirubakaran 
Published: January 2021

Background

Metaphyseal fracture healing in the distal femur requires a stable biomechanical environment. The presence of arthritis-induced coronal-plane knee deformities can cause deviation of the mechanical axis, which results in asymmetric loading and increased bending forces in fractures of the distal femur metaphysis. This predisposes patients to nonunions or loss of fixation. Concurrent TKA during revision osteosynthesis might facilitate fracture healing, owing to its ability to correct coronal alignment, thereby restoring normal loading patterns at the fracture site, but to our knowledge, this has not been studied.

Questions/purposes

(1) Does TKA with concurrent revision internal fixation achieve fracture union in patients with coronal-plane deformity from knee arthritis and nonunion or loss of fixation in distal metaphyseal femoral fractures? (2) What is the survivorship and what are the short-term functional outcomes after these reconstructions? (3) What complications occur after these reconstructions?

Methods

Between 2015 and 2018, one surgeon treated 16 patients with a distal metaphyseal femur fracture nonunion and/or loss of fixation using concurrent TKA plus revision internal fixation. Autologous iliac crest bone grafting was performed in five patients with evident gaps at the fracture site. The indications for the procedure included patients older than 55 years of age presenting with a nonunion and/or loss of fixation of a distal metaphyseal femur fracture in the setting of painful Ahlbäck Grade III to V knee arthritis with an associated coronal-plane deformity. All patients meeting these indications were treated with this approach during the study period. Fracture union assessed by radiological bridging of at least three cortices, TKA survival free from revision due to any reason, coronal-plane correction using tibiofemoral angle, and patient mobility status assessed presurgery and at follow-up using the Parker mobility score (scored 0-9 points, with 9 indicating best mobility) were assessed by two surgeons who were not involved in the care of the study patients. Immediate and delayed complications were recorded. Patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months. The median (range) follow-up was 38 months (27 to 52 months).

Results

All fractures united after concurrent TKA plus revision internal fixation. In all, 14 of 16 fractures healed before 5 months, while the remaining two fractures united by 6 months. Survivorship analysis revealed a TKA component survival of 94% (95% CI 63% to 99%) at 52 months. The median (range) preoperative Parker mobility score of 5 points (3 to 8) improved to 7 points (2 to 9) at 12 months postoperatively and was maintained at last follow-up (p = 0.001). Four patients experienced complications; these were (1) prolonged surgical wound drainage resulting in debridement and polyethylene liner exchange, (2) deep knee infection needing a staged revision, (3) popliteal vein thrombosis, and (4) prolonged graft site pain.

Conclusion

Concurrent TKA plus revision internal fixation is effective for achieving union in patients with distal metaphyseal femur nonunion and loss of fixation in the setting of coronal-plane deformity induced by knee arthritis. Short-term TKA survival and improvement in patient mobility are excellent, although 4 of 16 patients in this report experienced complications, as one might expect with a procedure of this magnitude. Based on our results, correction of arthritis-induced coronal-plane knee malalignment can be considered part of the surgical strategy when treating such distal metaphyseal femur nonunions. Better preoperative evaluation of the deformity and control-based comparative studies can further validate the utility of this technique.

Level of Evidence

Level II, therapeutic study.