Особливості лінгвістичного аналізу художнього тексту як прагматично-комунікативної єдності
Authors: Шульжук Наталія 
Published: March 2024

The article substantiates modern paradigmatic space of linguistics, represented by the coexistence of two dominant paradigms - pragmatic and cognitive, and actualizes the text categories. The study argues that the distinction between them is determined by the dialogue interaction between the author and the reader through the artistic text. Due to this fact, the perspective of linguistic pragmatics and communicative linguistics in this area is the study of such aspects of the literary text as comprehension, perception and interpretation.

Artistic creativity is proved to be a complex communicative process that is the realization of a certain communicative intention of the author towards the recipient /addressee. In the course of the artistic text generation, the author models a communicative situation which is defined by both verbal and non-verbal factors. They affect the text creation as well as its comprehension which is the unifying link of the communicative space of the reader's interpretation and the communicative space of the author. However, the reader does not always interpret the pragmatic approach of the author adequately: his discursive activity actualizes the author's intentions, but the reader may also add his own ones.

The author of the article suggests using the term-concept of artistic discourse when referring to the literary text as a single communicative entity, in which the communicative intentions of the speaker are realized, taking into account the pragmatic approach to discourse analysis. Such an approach makes it possible to understand the artistic text as a pragmatic and communicative unity and interpret the content structure of the literary text in three dimensions – vertical, horizontal and going into depth. The latter concerns the implicit context, which often manifests the author`s intention.

In the polyparadigmatic space of modern linguistics, the anthropology-oriented theories, acquire special significance in the focus of which is a person who perceives and retransmits the language under specific socio-historical conditions. The author emphasizes that in the course of the linguistic analysis of the artistic text it is appropriate to actualize the definition of the “concept” as a formed idea in a person’s mind about the components of the real and imaginary world, expressed by the linguistic units. The article proves that the search for the concept is related to the comprehension of the author's idea, interpretation of the content of the artistic text, representing the linguistic picture of the world of its author.

A dialogue in the literary dicourse can be expressed both at the level of inter-subjective interaction and the inter-text interaction.

The author is certain, that there are preconditions for studying language as an ethnic phenomenon. Therefore it is expedient to identify and study linguistic units in the structure of the artistic text to identify cultural and psychological characteristics of an ethnic group. The article convincingly proves that artistic speech is the object of linguistic research within two linguistic paradigms – the traditional (system-centered), focused on the study of linguistic units and the linguistic style of the artistic speech of individual authors, and modern (pragmatic and communicative), oriented to the communicative situation and its components. The discourse status of the artistic text actualizes the pragmatic factor in it, which makes it possible to interpret the artistic text as a fixation of the message in a communicative act and emphasizes the communicative roles of the author and the reader. It means that the artistic text is just one of the components of artistic communication, which, additionally, forms discourses of the author and the reader. The coincidence of their conceptual systems is a prerequisite for an adequate comprehension of the artistic text.

 

Key words: text, artistic discourse, concept, perception and interpretation of the text, pragmatic and communicative unity, communicative, dialogic, linguistic analysis of the text.

 

References

Babenko, Ljudmila, and Kazarin, Jurij. Lingvisticheskij analiz hudozhestvennogo teksta. Teorija i praktika. Moskva: Flinta, Nauka, 2003.

Vorob'eva, Ol'ga. Lingvisticheskie aspekty adresovannosti hudozhestvennogo teksta (odnojazychnaja i mezhjazykovaja kommunikacii). Doctoral Thesis Abstract. Moskva, 1993.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method, edited by B. N. Bessonov. Moskva: Progress, 1988.

Horoshkina, Olena. “Rol kohnityvnoi metodyky u formuvanni sotsiokulturnoi kompetentsii uchniv”. Semantyka movy i tekstu: materialy XI Mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii. Ivano-Frankivsk, 2012, pp. 127–30.

Zhyvytska, Inna. “The language picture of the world as a reflection of the reality”. Philological Studies. Scientific bulletin of Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, iss. 4, 2010, pp. 20–5.

Zahnitko, Anatolii. Linhvistyka tekstu: teoriia i praktykum. Donetsk: Yuho-Vostok, 2007.

Zorivchak, Roksoliana. Realiia i pereklad (na materiali anhlomovnykh perekladiv ukrainskoi prozy). Lviv, 1989.

Yermolenko, Svitlana. “Stylistyka suchasnoi ukrainskoi literaturnoi movy v konteksti slovianskykh stylistyk”. Movoznavstvo, no 2–3, 1998, pp. 25–36.

Kovalyk, Ivan. Metodyka linhvistychnoho analizu tekstu. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola, 1984.

Kolegaeva, Irina. Tekst kak edinica nauchnoj i hudozhestvennoj kommunikacii. Odessa, 1991.

Kondratenko, Nataliia. Syntaksys ukrainskoho modernistskoho i postmodernistskoho khudozhnoho dyskursu. Kyiv, 2012.

Kochan, Iryna. Linhvistychnyi analiz tekstu. 2nd ed. Kyiv: Znannia, 2008.

Kulibina, Natal'ja. Hudozhestvennyj diskurs kak aktualizacija hudozhestvennogo teksta v soznanii chitatelja. www.gramota.ru/biblio/magazines/mrs/ mrs2001-01/28_211

Kukharenko, Valeriia. Interpretatsiia tekstu. Vinnytsia: Nova knyha, 2004.

Lysenko, Nelia. “Spetsyfika khudozhnoho slova i yoho funktsionalni vyiavy v ukrainskii literaturi”. Ridne slovo v etnokulturnomu vymiri. Drohobych: Posvit, 2012.

Lutsenko, Oksana. “Hermenevtychni kryterii linhvistychnoho analizu tekstu”. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi filolohii. Movoznavchi studii, iss. 21 (3), 2013, pp. 131–3.

Mihajlov, N. Teorija hudozhestvennogo teksta. Moskva: Izdatel'skij centr “Akademija”, 2006.

Papina, Aza. Tekst: ego edinicy i global'nye kategorii. Moskva, 2002.

Petrova, L. Lingvokognitivnye osnovy hudozhestvennoj kartiny mira. Simferopol', 2006.

Plehanova T. Diskurs-analiz teksta. Minsk: TetraSistems, 2011.

Postovalova, Valentina. Kartina mira v zhiznedejatel'nosti cheloveka. Rol' chelovecheskogo faktora v jazyke: jazyk i kartina mira. Moskva: Nauka, 1988.

Prohorov, Jurij. Dejstvitel'nost'. Tekst. Diskurs. Moskva: Flinta; Nauka, 2006.

Sedov, Konstantin. Diskurs i lichnost': jevoljucija kommunikativnoj kompetencii. Moskva: Labirint, 2004.

Selivanova, Elena. Osnovy lingvisticheskoj teorii teksta i kommunikacii.  Kiev: CUL; Fitosociocentr, 2002.

Selivanova, Olena. Suchasna linhvistyka: napriamy ta problemy. Poltava: Dovkillia-K, 2008.

Sidorov, Evgenij. Ontologija diskursa. 2nd ed. Moskva, 2009.

Formanova, S. “Funktsionalno-stylistychna semantyka zaholovka yak strukturoutvoriuiuchoho elementa tekstu”. Newsletter of Precarpathian University. Philology, iss. ХV–ХVІІІ, 2007, pp. 566–70.