Patient Centered Preference Survey for Identifying a Proceduralist Performing Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy (EBUS)
Authors:   Medical Director, Interventional Pulmonology, Department of Surgery Inova Schar Cancer Institute. Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church, VA, Mahajan Amit K , Fairbanks Bonnie ,   Bonnie Fairbanks, RRT-N PS, Interventional Pulmonology, Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church, VA, Ramsey Lolita ,   Department of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, Patel Priya P ,   Department of Interventional Pulmonology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church, VA, Duong Kevin ,   Department of Interventional Pulmonology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church, VA, Bari Mahwish ,   Clinical Research Coordinator, Lung/Interventional Pulmonology Inova Schar Cancer Institute Falls Church, VA, Weyant Michael J ,   Director, Thoracic Surgery, Moran Family Endowed Chair in Thoracic Oncology Inova Schar Cancer Institute Inova Fairfax Hospital Falls Church, VA, Suzuki Kei ,   Thoracic Surgery, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, Hogarth Douglas K ,   Medical Director, Bronchoscopy, Professor of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center Chicago, IL
Published: August 2022

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopy (EBUS) is a minimally invasive procedure using real-time imaging to biopsy malignant and benign lesions within the thoracic cavity. While physicians rely heavily on the degree of training to obtain EBUS procedural proficiency, patients may not consider training to be the primary factor that influences the physician they choose. Traditionally, patients undergoing any medical procedure assume that the treating physician has completed standardized training and is proficient in procedural techniques. Because there is no standardized training for EBUS, patients cannot necessarily rely on the level of training of the physician performing the procedure. This survey-based study examines factors that were most and least important to patients regarding the physician who would be performing their EBUS bronchoscopy. Methods: Using best-worst scaling (BWS), object case methods (case 1; Louviere et al, 2015), a survey was developed with a balanced incomplete block design (BIBD): 11 objects (Figure 1), repeated 5 times across 11 sets with a set size of 5 and co-occurs with the other 10 objects twice. In the survey, titled EBUS Patient Preference Survey, participants were instructed to identify the factors (objects) that were most and least important to them when making arrangements for an EBUS procedure. The data was analyzed by calculating a normalized best-worst (NBW) score for the total sample/aggregate for each object. The data was also analyzed as a percentage distribution on the proportion selected as most versus least important versus never selected (denominator = 930). Analyses were conducted using SPSS (IBM Corp, Version 26.0). Results: Of the 193 patients who consented, 3 withdrew due to the length of the survey and 4 incorrectly completed the survey, resulting in a sample size of 186. The overall sample felt that a doctor who communicated well was most important to them when arranging for an EBUS procedure, followed by a physician with more years of experience performing EBUS, referral from their doctor, and procedure performed in a specialized facility. ). The least important factor when arranging for an EBUS procedure was out of pocket cost for procedure, time to scheduling, and positive doctor rating online. Conclusions: Our study reveals that patients prefer physicians who communicates well, has more years of experience performing EBUS, and was referred to by their physician to be the most important factors when choosing an EBUS proceduralist