The inflamed immune phenotype (IIP): A clinically actionable artificial intelligence (AI)-based biomarker predictive of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcomes across >16 primary tumor types.
Authors: Shen Jeanne , Choi Yoon-La , Lee Taebum , Kim Hyojin , Chae Young Kwang , Dulken Benjamin , Bogdan Stephanie , Huang Maggie , Fisher George A. , Park Sehhoon , Lee Se-Hoon , Hwang Jun Eul , Chung Jin-haeng , Kim Leeseul , Shin Seunghwan , Lim Yoojoo , Song Heon , Pereira Sergio , Ock Chan-Young 
Published: June 2022

2621

Background: The IIP, defined by enriched intratumoral tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), is a potential tumor-agnostic biomarker of responsiveness to ICI therapy. Here, we validate the IIP, as assessed by Lunit SCOPE IO, an AI-powered spatial TIL analyzer that runs on routine H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSI), for clinical outcome prediction in a large, multi-center international cohort of ICI-treated patients, demonstrating its utility as a practical biomarker to guide ICI treatment planning. Methods: Lunit SCOPE IO was developed using 17,849 H&E WSI of multiple cancer types, annotated by 104 board-certified pathologists (13.5 x 109 µm2 area and 6.2 x 106 TIL). IIP+ tumors were defined as those with ≥ 20% of all 1 mm2 tumor tiles in a WSI classified as having a high intratumoral TIL density. We evaluated the correlation between IIP and ICI treatment outcomes (overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by RECIST v1.1) in a real-world dataset of 1,806 patients ( > 16 primary tumor types) retrospectively collected from Stanford University Medical Center, Samsung Medical Center, Chonnam National University Hospital, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, and Northwestern University. IIP status was sub-analyzed by PD-L1 22C3 tumor proportion score (TPS, n = 798), microsatellite status, and tumor mutational burden (TMB, n = 130). Results: The IIP+ phenotype (35.2%, 636 of 1,806) was highly enriched in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (68.0%), melanoma (56.3%), renal cell carcinoma (52.9%), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 33.7%). The IIP+ proportion by PD-L1 TPS ( < 1% / ≥ 1%) was 21.6% and 40.7%, respectively. While 33.3% of microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) or TMB-high (≥ 10/Mb) tumors were IIP+, a substantial proportion (26.1%) of microsatellite stable (MSS), TMB-low tumors were IIP+. The ORR in IIP+ patients was significantly higher (26.0% vs. 15.8% in IIP-, p < 0.001). Median PFS for IIP+ was 5.3 months (95% CI 4.6-6.9 m), significantly longer than that for IIP- (3.1 m, 95% CI 2.8-3.6 m), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.68 (95% CI 0.61-0.76, p < 0.001). The association held after excluding NSCLC patients (n = 909) (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.81, p < 0.001). On subgroup analysis, IIP+ correlated significantly with prolonged PFS, regardless of ICI regimen (mono / combo therapy) or PD-L1 TPS ( < 1% / ≥ 1%). Of note, IIP+ was predictive of favorable PFS only in the MSS, TMB-low group (n = 88, HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.96), but not in the MSI-H or TMB-high groups. Conclusions: The IIP, as evaluated by Lunit SCOPE IO, may represent a practical, clinically-actionable biomarker predictive of favorable ICI treatment outcomes across diverse cancer patient populations, including those with PD-L1 negative, MSS/TMB-low tumors, in whom predictive biomarkers are urgently needed.