GAIT CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC CARTILAGE DEFECTS OF THE KNEE
Authors: Timme Beatrice , Biant Leela , McNicholas Mike , Tawy Gwenllian 
Published: November 2023

Objectives

Little is known about the impact of cartilage defects on knee joint biomechanics. This investigation aimed to determine the gait characteristics of patients with symptomatic articular cartilage lesions of the knee.

Methods

Gait analyses were performed at the Regional North-West Joint Preservation Centre. Anthropometric measurements were obtained, then 16 retroreflective markers representing the Plug-in-Gait biomechanical model were placed on pre-defined anatomical landmarks. Participants walked for two minutes at a self-selected speed on a treadmill on a level surface, then for 2 minutes downhill. A 15-camera motion-capture system recorded the data. Knee kinematics were exported into Matlab to calculate the average kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters per patient across 20 gait cycles. Depending on the normality of the data, paired t-tests or Wilcoxon ranked tests were performed to compare both knees (α = 0.05).

Results

20 patients participated; one of whom has bilateral cartilage defects. All 20 data sets were analysed for level walking; 18 were analysed for downhill walking. On a level surface, patients walked at an average speed of 3.1±0.8km/h with a cadence of 65.5±15.3 steps/minute. Patients also exhibited equal step lengths (0.470±0.072m vs 0.471±0.070m: p=0.806). Downhill, the average walking speed was 2.85±0.5km/h with a cadence of 78.8±23.1 steps/minute and step lengths were comparable (0.416±0.09m vs 0.420±0.079m: p=0.498). During level walking, maximum flexion achieved during swing did not differ between knees (54.3±8.6° vs 55.5±11.0°:p=0.549). Neither did maximal extension achieved at heel strike (3.1±5.7° vs 5.4±4.7°:p=0.135). On average, both knees remained in adduction throughout the gait cycle, with the degree of adduction greater in flexion in the operative knee. However, differences in maximal adduction were not significant (22.4±12.4° vs 18.7±11.0°:p=0.307). Maximal internal-external rotation patterns were comparable in stance (0.9±7.7° vs 3.5±9.8°: p=0.322) and swing (7.7±10.9° vs 9.8±8.3°:p=0.384). During downhill walking, maximum flexion also did not differ between operative and contralateral knees (55.38±10.6° vs 55.12±11.5°:p=0.862), nor did maximum extension at heel strike (1.32±6.5° vs 2.73±4.5°:p=0.292). No significant difference was found between maximum adduction of both knees (15.87±11.0° vs 16.78±12.0°:p=0.767). In stance, differences in maximum internal-external rotation between knees were not significant (5.39±10.7° vs 6.10±11.8°:p=0.836), nor were they significant in swing (7.69±13.3° vs 7.54±8.81°:p=0.963).

Conclusions

Knee kinematics during level and downhill walking were symmetrical in patients with a cartilage defect of the knee, but an increased adduction during flexion in the operative knee may lead to pathological loading across the medial compartment of the knee during high flexion activities. Future work will investigate this further and compare the data to a healthy young population. We will also objectively assess the functional outcome of this joint preservation surgery to monitor its success.

Declaration of Interest

(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.