Weed infestation during the transition phase from conventional to conservation agriculture
Authors: Sartori Felice , Loddo Donato , Piccoli Ilaria , Berti Antonio 
Published: March 2020

&lt;p&gt;Despite conservation agriculture and, overall, the reduction of soil disturbance are considered soil improving cropping systems, these practices could conflict with weed control. Indeed, reduced tillage is usually linked to increased weed species richness and abundance and, thus, it could increase the dependence on chemical treatments. Weed management is one of the reasons behind the distrust of European farmers in the conservation agriculture, that is still not widespread, despites European subsidies. In fact, conservation agriculture is implemented only in the 2.8% of European cropland.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of different tillage intensities on spring-summer weeds richness and abundance in a maize monoculture, during the transition phase from conventional to conservation agriculture.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The weed survey was conducted in June 2019 on an experiment comparing three levels of tillage management: conventional agriculture (CT), which represents the most common choice in Veneto region, involving deep ploughing and harrowing in spring; minimum tillage (MT), consisting only in harrowing at 20 cm; and no tillage (NT), namely sod seeding. The experiment started in 2018, at Padova University experimental farm, in a sub-humid area, with a silty clay loam soil. The survey was conducted with a set of random throws of a 30&amp;#215;30 cm square frame in each plot (ca. 3300 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;). &amp;#160;Weed plants found within the frame were classified and counted. Subsequently, data analysis assessed which botanical families were promoted by each treatment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The NT resulted the treatment with the highest weed density (915 plant/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;): 6% higher than MT (823 plant/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) and four-fold more than CT (209 plant/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;). The latter showed to be the treatment with higher diversity, according to both Shannon and Simpson indices. The survey evidenced higher weed species richness in MT, where both annual and perennial species were identified, while the lowest number of species were detected in NT. Plantago major and Chenopodium album were the species with the highest density in CT (&gt;32 plant/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) while they are negligible in NT and MT (7 plant/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, on average). Digitaria sanguinalis was instead the dominant species in MT and NT (&gt;600 plant/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) while a lower density was observed in CT (11 plant/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;). Low levels of Asteraceae weeds were measured in all treatments. These results shows that the actual flora rapidly changes depending on tillage intensity, with an increase of both dominance and number of species in MT. Differently, only a limited number of adapted species germinated in NT, despite higher infestations if compared with the other treatments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It should be expected that other species more adapted to conservation agriculture (namely Asteraceae), still marginally present in the seed bank, will spread in the next years. This stresses the importance of a continuous monitoring and effective control of weeds to avoid uncontrolled evolutions of the weed flora and increase of seed bank in the transition phase from conventional to conservation agriculture.&lt;/p&gt;