Vaso‐relaxant Effect of Zingiber officinale Extract Involves Release of Nitric Oxide from the Endothelium
Authors: Adebisi Iyabo Mobolawa , Bello Shaibu Oricha , Ugwah-Oguejiofor Chinenye Jane , Umaru Millicent Ladi , Abubakar Kabiru 
Published: April 2020

Introduction

Zingiber officinale (ZO) is an important plant with several medicinal, nutritional and ethnomedical values. The blood pressure lowering effect of ZO has been reported in experimental animals and human and some mechanisms have been postulated, including; blockage of voltage dependent calcium channel, stimulation of muscarinic receptors and serotonergic antagonistic property. The aim of this study is to investigate the vaso‐relaxant effect of the extract of ZO and the mechanism by which it is produced.

Method

Rhizomes of ZO were extracted in 80% methanol. Thoracic aorta isolated from male rabbits were cut into rings of 3–5 mm, mounted in organ baths containing 25 ml Krebs physiological solution maintained at 37 °C and bubbled continuously with a mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO2. The aortic rings were equilibrated for 30 min at a resting tension of 1 g. Responses were recorded isometrically via a force displacement transducer connected to a recording system. The presence of functional endothelium was checked by the ability of acetylcholine (1μM) to induce relaxation on phenylepherine (PE, 1μM) contracted rings. The relaxant responses to ZO was recorded by adding cumulative concentrations (10, 20, 40, 80, 100, 500, 1000 μg/ml) of ZO. To investigate the involvement of endothelium in the vaso‐relaxant action, endothelium was removed by gently rubbing the luminal surface of the ring with a polyethylene tube. To investigate which endothelium‐derived vasorelaxant factors were involved, the rings were pre‐incubated with Nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester (L‐NAME, 10 μM) or indomethacin (10 μM) for 30 min before addition of the spasmogen and ZO. Relaxant responses were expressed as percentage relaxation from PE‐precontraction levels. The EC50 (the concentration required to cause half‐maximal relaxation) was calculated from the concentration‐response curve. Results were expressed as means ± s.e.m. Student t‐test was used to assess the significant differences at (p < 0.05)

Results

ZO produced a vaso‐relaxation effect on rings pre‐contracted with PE (1μM) at concentrations of 20–100 μg/ml in endothelium intact rings with an EC50 of 14.8±1.2 μg/ml (Figure
1). This relaxation was not however seen at 500–1000 μg/ml but rather a vaso‐contraction was observed. In endothelium denuded rings, the vaso‐relaxation effect of ZO at 20–100 μg/ml was abolished while vaso‐relaxation was observed with 500–1000 μg/ml, the concentrations that otherwise produced contraction in endothelium intact aortic rings. Pre‐incubation of the tissues with L‐NAME (10μM) abolished the relaxant effect of ZO at 20–100μg/ml but caused relaxation effect with 500–1000 μg/ml similar to that observed with endothelium denuded rings. Pretreatment with indomethacin abolished the relaxant effect of ZO at 20μg/ml but not at 40 μg/ml and above (Figure
2).

Conclusion

Vaso‐relaxant effect of ZO is seen at lower concentrations, endothelium dependent and may involve the release of nitric oxide from the endothelium. There may be interplay between contractile and relaxant compounds in crude extract of ZO at concentrations above 500 μg/ml.

Support or Funding Information

The PhD study grant awarded to I.M Adebisi by Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria is acknowledged

Relaxation effect of methanol extract of Zingiber officinale (ZO) on phenylephrine‐precontracted aortic rings with intact endothelium. Data represent the mean ± s.e.m. of four individual experiments. * is p<0.05

Figure 1

Relaxation effect of methanol extract of Zingiber officinale (ZO) on phenylephrine‐precontracted aortic rings with endothelium, without endothelium and effect of L‐NAME (10 μM), and Indomethacin (10 μM) on ZO induced vasorelaxation on phenylephrine‐precontracted aortic rings with endothelium. Data represent the mean ± s.e.m. of four individual experiments. * is p<0.05

Figure 2