Human-flood systems: Why &#8220;pluralistic floods research&#8221; is a conceptual breakthrough?
Authors: Viglione Alberto , Mukherjee Jenia 
Published: March 2021

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Floods are concurrently natural and social phenomena. Though generally represented as &amp;#8220;natural calamity&amp;#8221; and described as &amp;#8216;phenomena of an atmospheric, hydrological or oceanographic nature&amp;#8217;&lt;!-- I know it is a citation but EGU abstracts usually have no references (or one/two if really needed). I would keep the Evers et al. (2017) since it&amp;#8217;s related to the main take home message --&gt;, floods are strongly dependant on territorial as well as historicized dynamics and negotiations. Moreover, as floods offer aggravated threats in the Anthropocene, marked by unpredictable climatic perturbations, impacting marginalized communities inhabiting vulnerable landscapes, it is imperative to collectively understand human-flood systems to craft sustained solutions. Socio&lt;span&gt;-&lt;/span&gt;hydrological contribution on human-floods system, building upon &amp;#8216;complex web of interactions and feedback mechanisms between hydrological and social processes in settled floodplains&amp;#8217;, can be considered a significant advancement from hardcore flood hydrology confined to risk analysis through geomorphological accounting of river systems. With the hydrological science as a background, while the methods of socio&lt;span&gt;-&lt;/span&gt;hydrology often rely on quantitative or mathematical modeling approaches to represent the human-floods systems, hydro&lt;span&gt;-&lt;/span&gt;social analysis, emanating from political ecology, explores power equations&lt;!-- As hydrlogist I understand equations of the type &amp;#8220;y = a*x^b&amp;#8221; but I guess you mean something else right? --&gt; in water-society relationship. Though the hydro&lt;span&gt;-&lt;/span&gt;social literature mainly dealt with political and social injustices around utilities in urban landscapes for a long time, recently, the thrust has shifted to study stakeholders&amp;#8217; controversies in river basin (co)management and governance. &lt;!-- I&amp;#8217;ve removed the part which seemed to me a bit too focused (but feel free to disagree) and added a sentence on the chapter writing. Can this be an experiment of pluralistic research? I guess I am oversimplifying things... so please correct me if I am wrong. --&gt;&lt;span&gt;We are in the process of establishing a team of experts from the physical and social sciences who &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;are asked&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; to provide a synthesis of the existing&lt;/span&gt; methodological frameworks on coupled human-flood systems,&lt;span&gt; within the Panta Rhei IAHS initiative. Our work&lt;/span&gt; identifies and lays out converging possibilities along multiple paradigms&lt;!-- This sentence is not clear to me... --&gt;, finally proposing a strong case for &amp;#8220;pluralistic floods research&lt;!-- Can you add a sentence on what is ment by pluralistic? Is it multidisciplinary? I guess more than that --&gt;&amp;#8221; (see Evers et al., 2017&lt;span&gt;, https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120933&lt;/span&gt;). We argue that a robust understanding of the human-flood systems imbibing &amp;#8220;pluralistic floods research&amp;#8221; can meaningfully contribute to ongoing debates on flood risk governance, facilitating spatially-informed and historically-contingent interventions, beyond purely technical approaches.&lt;/p&gt;