Timing and geometry of the Chemehuevi Formation reveal a late Pleistocene sediment pulse into the Lower Colorado River
Authors: Gray Harrison J. , House P. Kyle , Hudson Adam M. , Vazquez Jorge A. , Crow Ryan , Primus Miriam , Mahan Shannon , Rittenour Tammy , Howard Keith A. 
Published: October 2024

The Chemehuevi Formation is a distinctive 50–150-m-thick wedge-shaped Pleistocene sedimentary unit deposited by the Colorado River. It lines the perimeters of the river’s floodplains and bedrock canyons for more than 600 km between the mouth of the Grand Canyon and the delta region in the Gulf of California. The formation is composed of a basal tan to light-yellowish-brown and pale-orange mud-dominated facies overlain and interbedded by a light-yellow-brown sand-dominated facies. The unit is one of two extensively exposed aggradational packages in the Lower Colorado River corridor, in addition to a series of other smaller alluvial terrace deposits. The Chemehuevi Formation appears to represent the response of a fully integrated Colorado River system to a significant perturbation, in contrast to the Bullhead Alluvium, which is likely a unique result of Pliocene river integration. The aggradation of the Chemehuevi Formation in the Lower Colorado River corridor may be similarly due to a unique event in the Colorado River system, or it may instead be a well-preserved sedimentary sequence recording typical behavior of the Colorado River below the Grand Canyon in the late Pleistocene. As such, multiple causal mechanisms have been proposed, but no study to date has conclusively explained the Chemehuevi Formation.

To help resolve its timing, duration, and origin, we applied post-infrared infrared stimulated luminescence, carbonate U-Th series, and zircon sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe U-Th series geochronology to determine the ages of key exposures of the unit over a wide spatial area. These new data demonstrate that the Chemehuevi Formation was deposited ca. 110–90 ka. The depositional ages collectively overlap, suggesting that deposition occurred rapidly relative to the resolution of the geochronometers. The new depositional timing coincides with a shift from glacial to interglacial conditions after the marine isotope stage 5-6 transition. This observation is consistent with a climate-induced sediment pulse as a causal mechanism, yet correlations with similar deposits in the Colorado River headwaters or in neighboring catchments appear elusive. Potentially, climate transitions between glacial and interglacial periods induced a sediment pulse from hillslopes of the Colorado River system that resulted in the Chemehuevi Formation. An alternative or additional explanation is that the Chemehuevi Formation represents release of lava dam–impounded sediment in the Grand Canyon. The surface geometry of the Chemehuevi Formation projects upstream to the approximate location of lava dams, and the largest possible lava dam impoundment (the Upper Prospect dam) is comparable in volume to the formation. The lava dam hypothesis appears to be a possible explanation for the Chemehuevi Formation. However, tying deposition to a specific lava dam or series of lava dams remains challenging due to discrepancies in timing and volume. The combined effects of a series of lava dams may have led to the Chemehuevi Formation, as the last Pleistocene lava dam eruption coincides with the onset of deposition. Alternatively, the formation may result from the combined effects of both regional climate transitions and the lava dams that created a transient reservoir to compound a climate transition–driven sediment pulse. The geochronologic data presented here do not allow us to distinguish between the lava dam or climate transition hypotheses but will need to be reconciled with any future proposed depositional model.