bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025 huggingface dataset:
Analysis of KRAS/NRAS mutations in PEAK: A randomized phase II study of FOLFOX6 plus panitumumab (pmab) or bevacizumab (bev) as first-line treatment (tx) for wild-type (WT) KRAS (exon 2) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Authors: Schwartzberg Lee Steven , Rivera Fernando , Karthaus Meinolf , Fasola Gianpiero , Canon Jean-Luc , Yu Hua , Oliner Kelly S. , Go William Y.
Published: March 2020

3631

Background: PEAK estimated the tx effect of FOLFOX6 with pmab or bev in 1st-line WT KRAS mCRC. The PRIME study showed significantly improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with pmab + FOLFOX vs FOLFOX in pts with WT RAS (KRAS/NRAS exons 2, 3, 4) mCRC in a prospective-retrospective analysis (unpublished data). Methods: This prospective-retrospective analysis of PEAK was designed to assess the effect of pmab + FOLFOX6 or bev + FOLFOX6 on PFS (primary endpoint) and OS in WT RAS (KRAS/NRAS exons 2, 3, 4) mCRC. Pts were required to have WT KRAS exon 2 tumors. Bidirectional Sanger sequencing and Transgenomic SURVEYOR/WAVE analysis were independently conducted to detect mutations in KRAS exon 3 (codons 59/61), exon 4 (codons 117/146); NRAS exon 2 (codons 12/13), exon 3 (codons 59/61), exon 4 (codons 117/146); BRAF exon 15 (codon 600) in banked specimens. Results: 285 WT KRAS (exon 2) mCRC patients (pts) were randomized, 278 received tx. The current RAS ascertainment rate is 75%. Tx HRs (pmab:bev) for pts with WT RAS were 0.63 (95% CI, 0.43-0.94; p = 0.02) for PFS and 0.55 (95% CI, 0.30-1.01; p = 0.06) for OS (Table). The incidence of worst grade 3-5 adverse events was consistent with the primary analysis. Updated OS and BRAF results will be presented. Conclusions: In this 1st-line estimation study in WT RAS mCRC, PFS and OS HR favored pmab + FOLFOX6 relative to bev + FOLFOX6, suggesting that activating RAS mutations appear to be predictive for pmab tx effect. The safety profile for both arms was consistent with previously reported studies. Clinical trial information: NCT00819780. [Table: see text]
Regorafenib (REG) in progressive metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Analysis of age subgroups in the phase III CORRECT trial.
Authors: van Cutsem Eric , Sobrero Alberto , Siena Salvatore , Falcone Alfredo , Ychou Marc , Humblet Yves , Bouche Olivier , Mineur Laurent , Barone Carlo , Adenis Antoine , Argilés Guillem , Yoshino Takayuki , Lenz Heinz-Josef , Goldberg Richard M. , Sargent Daniel J. , Cihon Frank , Wagner Andrea , Laurent Dirk , Cupit Lisa , Grothey Axel
Published: March 2020

3636

Background: In the CORRECT phase III trial, the multikinase inhibitor REG demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival vs placebo (Pla) in patients (pts) with mCRC whose disease progressed on other standard therapies. The most frequent REG-related grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) of interest were hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR), fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, and rash/desquamation. We explored whether the impact of REG in pts aged ≥65 years differed from that in younger patients. Methods: Pts with mCRC progressing following all other available therapies were randomized 2:1 to receive REG 160 mg once daily (n=505) or Pla (n=255) for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. The dose could be modified to manage AEs. The primary endpoint was OS. We report efficacy, safety, and dosing data from REG recipients by age. Results: The REG treatment group included 309 pts <65 years (307 evaluable for safety) and 196 pts ≥65 years (193 evaluable for safety). The OS hazard ratio (REG/Pla) was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56–0.91) in pts <65 years and 0.86 (95% CI 0.61–1.19) in pts ≥65 years (interaction p-value = 0.405). Median OS was 6.7 vs 5 months for REG vs Pla in pts <65 years, and 6.0 vs 5.6 months, respectively, in pts ≥65 years. Most pts experienced drug-related AEs (<65 years: 93.8%; ≥65 years: 91.7%). The rates of grade ≥3 REG-related AEs of interest and dose modifications are shown in the Table. In pts <65 years vs ≥65 years, median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of REG was 7.6 weeks (6.6–15.4) vs 7.1 weeks (5.1–17.2), median (IQR) daily REG dose was 160.0 mg (134.6–160.0) vs 160.0 mg (137.5–160.0), and median (IQR) proportion of planned REG dose was 83.3% (65.7–100.0) vs 78.6% (66.7–100.0), respectively. Conclusions: In the CORRECT trial, REG demonstrated an OS benefit in pts <65 years and ≥65 years. Safety and tolerability of REG appeared to be similar in both age subgroups. Clinical trial information: NCT01103323. [Table: see text]
Randomized phase III clinical study comparing postoperative UFT/LV,UFT+LV/UFT and UFT+LV+PSK/UFT+PSK as adjuvant therapy for curatively resected stage III colorectal cancer HGCSG-CAD study.
Authors: Shichinohe Toshiaki , Komatsu Yoshito , Akazawa Kohei , Yuki Satoshi , Fukushima Hiraku , Ohno Kouichi , Nakamura Fumitaka , Kusumi Takaya , Morita Takayuki , Senmaru Naoto , Kumagai Naoko , Hirano Satoshi
Published: March 2020

3638

Background: Study showed that the oral anticancer agent UFT/LV is useful as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer. PSK, a protein-bound polysaccharide extracted from the mycelia of Coriolus versicolor, is an immunomodulator widely used in gastric, colorectal and lung cancers. Methods: Patients aged 20-80 years with stage III colorectal cancer registered in 35 facilities were randomized to: group A (UFT/LV 28 days/5 weeks for 6 months); group B (UFT+LV 28 days/5 weeks for 6 months, then UFT for 12 months); and group C (UFT+LV+PSK 28 days/5 weeks for 6 months, then UFT+PSK for 12 months). Treatment was started within 6 months after curative resection. Outcome measures were relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), incidence and severity of adverse events, and QOL. Results: Of 342 patients registered, 340 eligible patients were analyzed (84 in group A, 85 in group B, and 171 in group C). At baseline, variation in QOL score was observed but histopathological parameters were not different among 3 groups. Median observation period was 36 months. 3-year RFS was 73.8%, 77.6% and 73.9% in groups A, B, and C [A vs C: hazard ratio (HR) 0.960, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.575-1.601; B vs C: HR 0.837, CI 0.488-1.433; A vs B: HR 1.151, CI 0.623-2.126]. 3-year OS was 95.2%, 91.8% and 89.9% in groups A, B, and C (A vs C: HR 0.460, CI 0.155-1.367; B vs C: HR 0.814, CI 0.338-1.963 A vs B: HR 0.570, CI 0.167-1.947). Adverse events ≥grade 3 included gastrointestinal symptoms and general status. There was no treatment-related death. Excluding high fatigue score in QOL scale that showed pretreatment variation, stratification analysis showed interaction between family score and group, and efficacy was suggested especially in group C with high score (3-yesr RFS: 66.7%, 68.2% and 88.1% in groups A, B, and C. A vs C: HR 3.289, CI 0.951-11.375, B vs C: HR 3.070, CI 0.973-9.685, A vs B: HR 1.084, CI 0.344-3.417). Conclusions: A significant difference in primary endpoint was not detected. Variation in QOL at treatment initiation probably greatly affected outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT00209742.
Phase II, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of nimotuzumab plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC).
Authors: Strumberg Dirk , Schultheis Beate , Ebert Matthias Philip , Kerkhoff A. , Hofheinz Ralf Dieter , Behringer Dirk M. , Schmidt Wolfgang E. , Goker Erdem , De Dosso Sara , Kneba Michael , Yalcin Suayib , Overkamp Friedrich , Schlegel Frank , Dommach M. , Rohrberg Robert , Steinmetz Tilman , Reuter Dirk , Bach Ferdinand
Published: March 2020

4009

Background: FOLFIRINOX significantly increases survival in metastatic PC compared to gemcitabine, but its use is limited to selected pts, due its high toxicity. In the majority of cases, gemcitabine (gem) remains the mainstay of palliative treatment, although its modest impact on survival and disease progression. The addition of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib prolonged median survival for only 2 weeks.This study was aimed to investigate the effect of adding Nimotuzumab (nimo), an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, to first-line gemcitabine, in PC. Methods: Pts with previously untreated, unresectable, locally-advanced or metastatic PC were randomly assigned to receive gem: 1000 mg/m2/ 30-min iv once weekly (d1, 8, 15; q28) and nimo: fixed dose of 400 mg once weekly as a 30-min infusion, or placebo, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included PFS, safety, objective response rate (ORR), QoL. Results: Between 9/2007- 10/2011 a total of 192 pts were randomized (average age 63.6 ±10 years; 60% male; 69% ECOG PS 0), and 186 were evaluable at the ITT analysis. One-year OS was 19.5 % with gem+placebo and 34.4% with gem+nimo (HR=0.69; p=0.034). Median OS and PFS were 6.0 mo in the gem+placebo group, vs. 8.7 mo in gem+nimo (HR=0.83; p=0.21), and 3.7 vs. 5.4 mo, respectively (HR=0.73; p=0.06). One-year PFS was 9.5 % for gem+placebo, compared with 21.5% for gem+nimo (HR=0.71; p=0.05). Significantly, in pts ≥ 62 years (60% of the population), median OS and PFS were 5.2 mo in the gem+placebo group vs. 8.8 mo in gem+nimo (HR=0.66; p=0.034), and 3.2 in gem+placebo vs. 5.5 mo in gem+nimo group, respectively (HR=0.55; p=0.0096). Nimo was safe and well tolerated, and no grade 3/4 toxicities were observed. Thirteen % of pts experienced grade 1/2 skin toxicity. Conclusions: This randomized study clearly showed that nimo in combination with gem is safe and well tolerated. The 1-year survival rate is significantly improved. Especially pts ≥ 62 years seem to benefit, possibly due to a more aggressive biology in younger pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00561990.
SPARC in pancreatic cancer: Results from the CONKO-001 study.
Authors: Sinn Marianne , Sinn Bruno Valentin , Striefler Jana Kaethe , Stieler Jens , Pelzer Uwe , Prinzler Judith , Neuhaus Peter , Dietel Manfred , Dörken Bernd , Oettle Helmut , Riess Hanno , Denkert Carsten
Published: March 2020

4016

Background: Previous investigations in pancreatic cancer suggested an important prognostic role for SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) expression in the peritumoral stroma but not for cancer-cell cytoplasmic SPARC expression. So far no data from prospective studies in patients after curatively intended surgery are available. Methods: CONKO-001, a prospective randomized phase III study, investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine as compared to observation. Tissue samples of 160 patients were collected and analysed by immunohistochemistry for the expression of SPARC in the peritumoral stroma (strong versus not strong [=moderate to negative]) and in the tumor cell cytoplasm (immunoreactive score IRS 0-12, 0-2 = negative, 3-12 = positive) by a pathologist blinded to clinical outcome. Kaplan-Meier analyses for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed in dependence of SPARC expression. Results: Strong stromal SPARC expression was associated with worse DFS and OS in the overall study population (strong vs not-strong DFS 9.0 vs 12.6 months, p=0.005; OS 19.8 vs 26.6 months (p=0.033). It was highly prognostic in the subgroup treated with gemcitabine (strong vs not-strong DFS 12.1 vs. 18.4 months; p=0.007, OS 17.9 vs 30.2 months, p=0.006), but not in the observation group (strong vs not strong DFS 6.6 vs 7.3 months p=0.767; OS 21.5 vs 18.2 months, p=0.765). Cytoplasmic SPARC expression in the adenocarcinoma cells was also associated with worse patient outcome (positive vs negative DFS 7.4 vs 12.1 months, p=0.041; OS 14.1 vs 25.6 months, p=0.011), again the effect was restricted to patients treated with gemcitabine (positive vs negative DFS 8.3 vs 15.3 months, p=0.002; OS 11.0 vs 28.8 months, p= 0.003; control group DFS 5.8 vs 7.6 months, p=0.844; OS 14.9 vs 20.8 months, p=0.519). Conclusions: Our data confirm the prognostic significance of SPARC expression and demonstrate a significant prognostic factor of SPARC in patients with pancreatic cancer after curatively intended resection. The prognostic impact was restricted to patients who received adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine. In difference to former published data this was found for peritumoral SPARC as well as for SPARC expression in tumor cells.
Clinical outcome according to tumor HER2 status and EGFR expression in advanced gastric cancer patients from the EXPAND study.
Authors: Lordick Florian , Kang Yoon-Koo , Salman Pamela , Oh Sang Cheul , Bodoky Gyorgy , Kurteva Galina Petrova , Volovat Constantin D. , Moiseyenko Vladimir , Sawaki Akira , Park Joon Oh , Gorbunova Vera A. , Goette Heiko , Melezinkova Helena , Stroh Christopher , Moehler Markus
Published: March 2020

4021

Background: In the EXPAND study adding cetuximab to first-line capecitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy (CT) failed to improve clinical outcome in patients (pts) with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. This analysis assessed treatment outcome according to tumor HER2 status (a pre-defined subgroup) and EGFR expression in EXPAND study pts. Methods: Tumor HER2 status was determined primarily by immunohistochemistry (IHC), HER2 +ve tumors were IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) +ve. EGFR expression was assessed by IHC. A continuous scoring system (scale of 0–300) was used to determine the level of EGFR expression. Biomarker status was correlated with clinical outcome. Results: In both treatment arms, pts with HER2 +ve tumors (n=144) vs HER2 -ve tumors (n=535) had a longer median overall survival (OS): 13.3 (95% CI 10.9–15.5) vs 9.2 (95% CI 8.1–10.5) months in the CT + cetuximab arm and 14.0 (95% CI 11.3–17.1) vs 9.7 (95% CI 8.6–11.0) months in the CT arm, and a better overall response rate, 51.4 (95% CI 39.3–63.3) vs 27.0 (95% CI 21.9–32.6) % and 37.5 (95% CI 26.4–49.7) vs 26.4 (95% CI 21.1–32.3) % respectively. In stepwise multivariable models, pts with HER2 -ve vs HER2 +ve tumors showed an increased risk of death (adjusted hazards ratio 1.552, 95% CI 1.244–1.936) and reduced odds of response (adjusted odds ratio 0.477, 95% CI 0.316–0.720). EGFR tumor expression was evaluable in 774 pts from the intent to treat population (n=904). The EGFR IHC score was low (median 0, range 0–300). No discriminating threshold for the IHC score was identified. However in pt subgroups defined by a series of cut-off points from an IHC score of 10 upwards (rising incrementally by 10), there was a tendency for improved OS, progression-free survival, and tumor response when adding cetuximab to CT in pts with high tumor EGFR IHC scores. Conclusions: In this analysis of EXPAND study pts, those with HER2 +ve tumors were associated with better outcome irrespective of the treatment arm compared with pts with HER2 -ve tumors. Tumor EGFR expression was generally low. Adding cetuximab to CT failed to improve outcome overall, but may benefit a small proportion of pts with high EGFR tumor expression. Clinical trial information: 2007-004219-75.
Placebo controlled, double blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors (PROMID): Results on long-term survival.
Authors: Arnold Rudolf , Wittenberg Michael , Rinke Anja , Schade-Brittinger Carmen , Aminossadati Behnaz , Ronicke Erdmuthe , Gress Thomas Mathias , Mueller Hans Helge ,   PROMID Study Group
Published: March 2020

4030

Background: Octreotide LAR (O) compared to placebo (P) lengthens significantly time to tumor progression (TTP) in patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors (Rinke et al. 2009). The antiproliferative response was more pronounced in patients with low (≤ 10%) hepatic tumor load (HL). To investigate whether this beneficial effect also affects overall survival (OS), patients included in the PROMID trial were followed until January 2013 at least once a year. Methods: Between July 2001 and January 2008, 42 and 43 patients were randomly assigned to receive O or P. Post study treatment was at the discretion of the local investigator. Data on cause of death and on post study treatment were documented. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment groups (O vs. P; HL at study entry ≤ 10% vs. >10%) were compared using the log rank test and hazard ratios were estimated with the use of the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: 41 of 85 patients died until January 2013. 19 in the octreotide and 22 in the placebo arm. Median OS for all 85 patients was 85 months, “not reached” in the O arm and 84 months in the P arm (p=0.59, HR=0.85 [CI 0.46; 1.56]). Cause of death was unrelated to the tumor disease in 8 patients. 26 of 64 patients (10 in the O vs. 16 in the P arm) died in the HL ≤ 10% subgroup and 15 of 21 patients (9 in the O vs. 6 in the P arm) in the HL > 10 % (p=0.002, HR=2.7). Median OS in the HL ≤ 10% subgroup was “not reached” (octreotide) vs 80.5 months (placebo) (p=0.14, HR=0.56 [CI 0.25; 1.23]). In the HL > 10% subgroup the respective numbers were 35 vs. 84 months (p=0.14, HR=2.18 [CI 0.75; 6.33]). Post study treatment in the O and P groups included octreotide LAR (29 vs. 38 patients), hepatic CHE (5 vs. 12 patients), PRRT (13 vs. 13 patients) and CHT (4 vs. 5 patients). Conclusions: Octreotide LAR not only prolongs TTP but also extends OS in the subgroup of patients with metastatic midgut NETs and a low HL (≤ 10% at study entry) but not in the high (HL > 10%) subgroup. Almost all patients who were randomized at study entry in the P group received octreotide LAR after disease progression, but these experienced a less favourable OS in the low HL subgroup. Clinical trial information: NCT00171873.
Effectiveness of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine neoplasms: A multi-institutional registry study with prospective follow-up.
Authors: Hörsch Dieter ,   AG PRRT Germany
Published: March 2020

4033

Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy targets somatostatin receptors expressed on well differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms. Retrospective monocentric studies indicate that peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is an effective treatment for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. Methods: We initiated a multi-institutional, prospective and board reviewed registry study for patients treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. 450 patients were included and followed for a mean of 24.4 months. Patients were treated with Lutetium-177 (54%), Yttrium-90 (17%) or both radionuclides (29%). Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms were derived of pancreas (38%), small bowel 30%), unknown primary (19%), lung (4%) and colorectum (3,5%). Most neuroendocrine neoplasms were well differentiated with a proliferation rate below 20% in 54% and were pretreated by 1 or more therapies in 73%. Results: Overall survival of all patients from the beginning of therapy was 59 months in median. Median survival depended on radionuclides used (Yttrium-90: 38 months; Lutetium-177: not reached; both: 58 months), proliferation rate (G1: median not reached; G2: 58 months; G3: 33 months; unknown: 55 months) and origin of primary tumors (pancreas: 53 months; small bowel: not reached; unknown primary: 47 months; lung: 38 months) but not upon number of previous therapies. Median progression-free survival measured from last cycle of therapy accounted to 41 months for all patients. Progression-free survival of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms was 39 months in median. Similar results were obtained for neuroendocrine neoplasms of unknown primary with a median of 38 months whereas neuroendocrine neoplasm of small bowel were progression-free for a median of 51 months. Side effects like G3-G4 nephrotoxicity or hematological function were observed in 0.2% and 2% of patients. Conclusions: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is effective for patients with G1-G2 neuroendocrine tumors irrespective of previous therapies with a survival advantage of several years compared to other therapies and only minor side effects.
Interim safety and efficacy analysis of a phase II, randomized study of GVAX pancreas and CRS-207 immunotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Le Dung T. , Wang-Gillam Andrea , Picozzi Vincent J. , Greten Tim F. , Crocenzi Todd S. , Springett Gregory M. , Morse Michael , Zeh Herbert , Cohen Deirdre Jill , Fine Robert Lance , Onners Beth , Uram Jennifer N. , Murphy Aimee , Skoble Justin , Lemmens Ed , Grous John J. , Dubensky Thomas , Brockstedt Dirk G. , Jaffee Elizabeth M.
Published: March 2020

4040^

Background: GVAX is composed of GM-CSF-secreting allogeneic pancreas cancer cell lines and administered with low-dose cyclophosphamide (CY) to inhibit regulatory T cells. In prior studies, GVAX induced mesothelin-specific T cell responses that correlated with survival. CRS-207 is a live-attenuated Listeria monocytogenes engineered to express human mesothelin. CRS-207 stimulates potent innate and adaptive immunity and has shown synergy with GVAX in mouse tumor models. Anecdotal survival benefit was observed in the CRS-207 phase I study in patients who received prior GVAX. Methods: Patients were enrolled with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) who received or refused ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy, had ECOG ≤ 1 and adequate organ function. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 2 doses of CY/GVAX followed by 4 doses of CRS-207 (Arm A) or 6 doses of CY/GVAX (Arm B) every 3 weeks. Clinically stable patients were offered additional 20-week courses. The primary endpoint was comparison of OS between treatment arms. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate safety, clinical and immune responses. Results: 90 patients were treated (Arm A: 61, Arm B: 29). As of Jan 2013, 27 patients completed 1 course (A: 24, B: 3) and 17 patients (A: 15, B: 2) initiated a 2nd course. Median age was 63. Median number of prior regimens was 3. No treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) or unexpected toxicities were observed. The most frequent Grade (G) 3/4 related toxicities were fever, lymphopenia, hypophosphatemia, elevated liver enzymes, and fatigue following CRS-207 in <5% of subjects. Of 51 patients evaluated post-treatment, 34% had stable disease in Arm A vs. 19% in Arm B. OS for all patients treated was 6 months in Arm A vs. 3.4 months in Arm B (two-sided, p=0.0114). Conclusions: Combined CY/GVAX pancreas and CRS-207 was generally well-tolerated with no treatment-related SAEs or unexpected G3/4 toxicities. The significant difference in OS between treatment arms met the criteria for early stopping. This indicates that the combination immunotherapy may extend OS for metastatic PDA patients with minimal toxicity and should continue to be developed as an effective therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01417000.
Pimasertib plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Results of a safety run-in part of a phase II trial.
Authors: Verslype Chris , Hammel Pascal , Hidalgo Manuel , Macarulla Teresa , Garcia-Carbonero Rocio , André Thierry , Van Den Eynde Marc , Saez Berta Laquente , Milella Michele , Raymond Eric , Faivre Thea , Milner Alvin , Tarabaric Dolores , Locatelli Giuseppe , Richter Oliver von , Laffranchi Bernard , Van Cutsem Eric
Published: March 2020

4041

Background: Activating MAPK pathway mutations (predominantly RAS) occur with a high incidence in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPaCa). Pimasertib is a MEK1/2 inhibitor with potent activity in cell lines and xenografts with an activated MAPK pathway. This two-part trial in patients (pts) with mPaCa comprises a dose-escalation safety run-in and a randomized phase II part (EudraCT 2009-011992-61). We defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of two pimasertib dosing schedules (S), and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Methods: Dose-escalation (3+3 design) in two dosing S of oral pimasertib: once-daily (qd) - 5 days on, 2 days off (S1); and twice-daily (bid) - continuous (S2) combined with the standard dose of gemcitabine (gem). Results: 53 pts (median age 61 years and ECOG performance status 0-1) have been treated at six dose levels in S1 (15 to 120 mg qd) and at 60 and 75 mg bid in S2. MTDs were defined as 120 mg qd and 75 mg bid. Two pts had a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the DLT observation period: a grade (G) 3 confusion with ataxia and disorientation at 60 mg bid and a G4 suicidal ideation at 75 mg bid. G3-4 adverse events (AEs) in >5% of pts were: neutropenia (32%), thrombocytopenia (25%), asthenia (19%), dyspnea (9%), transaminitis (9%), anemia (8%), and diarrhea, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary sepsis (6% each). Most common AEs were asthenia (70%), ocular AEs (68%), skin rash (62%), nausea (58%), diarrhea (58%), peripheral edema (51%), thrombocytopenia (49%), vomiting (45%), mucositis (43%), neutropenia (38%), decreased appetite (36%) and anemia (34%). The main ocular AE was serous retinal detachment (58%); manageable retinal vein occlusion occurred in five pts. PK data were comparable to pimasertib monotherapy and published gem data. Partial responses were noted in 10 pts and stabilisation ≥3 months in 13 pts. Hot spot mutations in genes activating the MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathway and correlation with clinical outcome are being investigated. Conclusions: Pimasertib MTDs were reached. The RP2D was defined as 60 mg bid. PK was dose proportional and associated with target inhibition. Sustained responses were seen in both dosing schedules. Clinical trial information: 2009-011992-61.
The impact of diabetes mellitus and metformin on survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Authors: Oh Do-Youn , Choi Younak , Kim Tae-Yong , Lee Kyung-Hun , Han Sae-Won , Im Seock-Ah , Kim Tae-You , Bang Yung-Jue
Published: March 2020

4044

Background: A causal relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and pancreatic cancer (PC) is well established. However, in patients with advanced PC (APC) who receive palliative chemotherapy, the impact of DM on prognosis is unclear. Methods: Between 2003 and 2010, we enrolled consecutive patients with APC, all recipients of palliative chemotherapy, with the provision that DM disease status could be properly defined. Enrollees were stratified by diagnosis, in accordance with 2010 DM criteria (AHA/ADA). DM at least 2 years' duration prior to diagnosis of APC qualified as remote-onset DM (vs recent-onset). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were then analyzed. Results: Of the 349 enrollees with APC, 183 (52.4%) had DM. In patients with DM, 160 had DM at the time APC was diagnosed (remote onset, 87; recent onset, 73); and the remaining 23 developed DM during the course of APC treatment. Ultimately, 73.2% (134/183) of DM patients received antidiabetic medication (metformin (56), sulfonylurea (62), insulin (43)). By multivariate analysis, cancer extent (HR, 1.792; p < 0.001) and weight loss during chemotherapy (HR, 1.270; p = 0.08) were associated with diminished overall survival (OS), whereas a diagnosis of DM (HR, 0.788; p = 0.05) conferred a positive effect on OS ( OS 8.4 months in DM patients vs 7.5 months in non-DM patients, p = 0.04). Among DM patients, recent-onset DM trended toward prolonged OS, compared with remote-onset/subsequent DM (9.8 months vs. 7.9 months, respectively; HR, 0.789; p = 0.142). Neither antidiabetic medication in general nor sulfonylurea or insulin specifically affected OS. However, recipients of metformin survived longer than non-recipients (HR, 0.693; 95% CI, 0.492-0.977; p = 0.036). Relative to the APC cohort overall including non-DM patients, metformin conferred better survival as well (11.0 months vs. 7.8 months, HR 0.712, p = 0.067), given similar baseline clinical characteristics. Conclusions: In patients with APC receiving palliative chemotherapy, recent-onset DM (within 2 years of APC diagnosis) and metformin treatment are positive prognosticators, associated with prolonged OS.
A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of chemotherapy regimens for metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC).
Authors: Gresham Gillian , Gill Sharlene , Wells George A , Jonker Derek J.
Published: March 2020

4050

Background: Recent RCTs suggest a survival benefit for combination therapy in mPC compared to gemcitabine alone. Such combinations include FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (G+nab-P). Survival and safety outcomes of these regimens were analyzed using gemcitabine as the reference comparator. Methods: Systematic review and NMA included data from reported phase III RCTs meeting quality standards and compared chemotherapy treatment to gemcitabine for mPC between 2000 and 2013. Excluded were trials assessing locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Following inter-trial heterogeneity assessment (patient characteristics, trial methodologies, treatment protocols), Bayesian NMAs were conducted for primary (overall survival [OS]) and secondary (progression free survival [PFS]) outcomes, overall response rate [ORR], and safety. Results: 27 studies were included involving 10 429 patients and 18 different treatments. No significant heterogeneity was observed between trials. When indirectly compared, FOLFIRINOX, PEFG and G+nab-P were top ranked for OS, PFS and ORR (Table). Comparing FOLFIRINOX and G +nab-P, there was no significant difference in odds ratios (OR) for febrile neutropenia, diarrhea or sensory neuropathy. FOLFIRINOX caused more gr3-4 neutropenia (OR 1.85 (95%Cl 1.1-3.4),p<0.05), and G+nab-P trended more gr3-4 fatigue (OR 2.03 95% Cl 0.95-3.8). Conclusions: Survival and safety outcomes were comparable amongst the three regimens identified from this network meta-analysis for mPC. FOLFIRINOX tended towards a greater survival benefit over G+nab-P and PEFG although comparisons did not reach statistical significance.Head-to-head trials between FOLFIRINOX, G+nab-P and PEFG are needed to further compare the survival benefits and safety profiles of these treatments. [Table: see text]
Identifying targetable pathways in pancreatic cancer from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates (EUS/FNA): Providing a personalized approach to targeted therapy.
Authors: Wang-Gillam Andrea , Wani Sachin , Langley Emma J. , Gao Feng , Murad Faris , Mullady Daniel , Early Dayna S , Edmundowicz Steven Alphonse , Linehan David , Kuller Anne , Jain Anjali , Kim Phillip Sangwook , Singh Sharat , Azar Riad
Published: March 2020

4051

Background: Targeted therapy trials in pancreatic cancer patients have either failed or, at most, provided only marginal benefit. Identification of activated key signaling pathways would allow the optimal selection of patients for kinase inhibitor trials. Hence, we launched a study to profile targetable pathways from EUS/FNA samples using an ultrasensitive multiplexed protein microarray platform (CEER, Prometheus). Methods: Patients who underwent routine diagnostic FNA for a suspicious lesion in the pancreas underwent two dedicated passes for CEER profiling of the following phosphorylated (activated) key molecules: HER1, HER2, HER3, c-met, IGF-IR, PI3K, AKT, MEK, ERK, and other signaling proteins. Results: Of 100 participants, final cytology results were: 73 carcinomas, 8 indeterminate, 13 negative, and 5 neuroendocrine. Pathway activation was heterogeneous in patients with carcinoma. Among 61 pancreatic cancer patients with adequate HER evaluation, a high prevalence of HER3 activation (62%) was observed, and concomitant activation of two or more HER pathways was seen in 52% of patients. In particular, activation of HER2 and HER3 was noted in 23% of carcinoma patients. High concordance of HER, PI3K and AKT activation was seen. Conclusions: Our study confirmed the feasibility of profiling targetable pathways from FNA samples. Furthermore, it illustrates highly variable and concomitant pathway activation among pancreatic cancer patients, suggesting the feasibility of a personalized approach to targeted therapy. Future trials will need to be designed to explore the clinical benefit of combinations of HER-targeted agents in defined subsets of pancreatic cancer patients, and further evaluation of the HER3 pathway is especially warranted. An analysis of pathway interactions and prognostic effects is in progress. [Table: see text]
MicroRNA biomarkers in whole blood for detection of pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Schultz Nicolai Aagaard , Dehlendorff Christian , Jensen Benny Vittrup , Bjerregaard Jon K. , Nielsen Kaspar , Bojesen Stig Egil , Calatayud Dan , Nielsen Svend Erik , Yilmaz Mette K. N. , Hollander Niels Henrik , Andersen Klaus Kaae , Johansen Julia S.
Published: March 2020

4052

Background: There is a great need for biomarkers for early diagnosis of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) to improve their poor prognosis. The aims were (1) to describe differences in miRNA expression in whole blood between patients with PC, healthy subjects (HS) and patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP); and (2) to identify panels of miRNAs for early diagnosis of PC. Methods: Case-control study. 409 patients with PC, 33 patients with other periampullary cancers (PAC) and 25 patients with CP were included prospectively in the Danish BIOPAC biomarker study. 312 blood donors were included as HS. MiRNA expressions in pretreatment 2.5 ml whole blood samples collected in PAXgene RNA tubes were investigated in three independent cohorts: “Discovery Study” (PC n=143, CP n=18, HS n=69); “Training Study” (PC n=180, HS n=199); and “Validation Study” (PC n=86, PAC n=33, CP n=7, HS n=44). TaqMan Human MicroRNA assay was used to screen 754 miRNAs in the “Discovery Study”. Fluidigm BioMark PCR System was used in the “Training Study” (38 miRNAs) and “Validation Study” (13 miRNAs). Results: The “Discovery Study” demonstrated that 38 miRNAs (out of a total of 754 miRNAs) in whole blood were significantly deregulated between patients with PC and controls. These miRNAs were tested in the “Training Study” and two diagnostic indexes were constructed including 4 miRNAs in bPANmiRC index I (= miR-150 + miR-636 – miR-145 – miR-223) or 10 miRNAs in bPANmiRC index II (= 6.9275 – 0.2134xmiR-122 – 0.3560xmiR-34a – 0.8577xmiR-145 + 1.0043xmiR-636 – 0.6725xmiR-223 + 0.7018xmiR-26b – 0.3233xmiR-885.5p + 1.1304xmiR-150 – 0.2204xmiR-126* - 0.1730xmiR-505) (AUC 0.86/0.93, sensitivity 85%/85% and specificity 64%/85%). Conclusions: We identified two diagnostic indexes, using 4 or 10 miRNAs in peripheral whole blood, with a potential clinical value in the evaluation of patients with uncharacteristic symptoms to identify PC at an early stage.
Prognostic value of an immune score combining intra- and peritumoral T-cell subset density in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Turcotte Simon , McNicoll Yannic , Soucy Genevieve , Gaboury Louis , Lapointe Real W. , Vandenbroucke-Menu Franck
Published: March 2020

4060

Background: Immune scoring based on T-cell subsets and density can add prognostic value to conventional TNM staging for patients with solid tumors, but limited data are available for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Using tissue microarrays, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RO, and FOXP3 T-cells were quantified by immunohistochemistry in the intratumoral (IT) compartment and peritumoral (PT) parenchyma of 111 consecutively resected specimens. T-cell counts were correlated with patient overall survival, disease-free survival, and time to recurrence (OS, DFS, TTR) by Cox regression, controlling for clinicopathological factors. An immune score (IS) based on IT CD4 T-cell count > median, PT CD8 T-cell count ≤ median, and IT/PT CD3 T-cell ratio >1, grouped patients into high, intermediate, or low categories if all 3, 1 to 2, or none of these immune features were present, respectively. Results: Median follow-up time was 20 months, and 85% of patients either died or recurred during the study period. By univariate analysis, PT CD8 T-cell count was associated with shorter OS (p=0.02), whereas both IT CD4 T-cell count and IT/PT CD3 T-cell ratio were associated with longer OS (p=0.01 and p=0.05, respectively). Alone, none of these immune features predicted TTR. Combined into an IS, patients in the high (n=23), intermediate (n=60), or low (n=23) categories had significantly different OS (respective medians 30, 17, and 13 months, log-rank p=0.01), DFS (28, 16, and 12 months, p=0.01), and TTR (21, 14, and 10 months, p=0.02). By multivariate analysis, the association between IS and clinical outcomes was independent of tumor size, extra-pancreatic invasion, and nodal metastases (TNM staging). The IS discriminated outcomes among patients with nodal metastases (n=80), such that node-positive patients with a high IS had a median survival similar to node-negative patients (30 and 33 months, p=0.7). FOXP3 and CD45RO T-cell counts did not appear to add prognostic value to the IS. Conclusions: An immune score that combines specific T-cell location and density may have prognostic value in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, independently from pathologic features currently used for staging.
A phase II trial of definitive chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF-R) in advanced esophageal cancer (KDOG 0501-P2).
Authors: Higuchi Katsuhiko , Komori Shouko , Tanabe Satoshi , Katada Chikatoshi , Azuma Mizutomo , Ishiyama Hiromichi , Sasaki Tohru , Ishido Kenji , Katada Natsuya , Hayakawa Kazushige , Koizumi Wasaburo ,   Kitasato Digestive Disease & Oncology Group
Published: March 2020

4070

Background: Our previous phase I study (Radiother Oncol 2008,87:398) provided evidence that definitive chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF-R) was tolerable and active in patients with advanced esophageal cancer (AEC). This phase II study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and toxicity of DCF-R in AEC. Methods: Patients with previously untreated carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who had T4 tumors, M1 lymph-node metastasis, or both received an infusion of docetaxel (35 mg/m2) and an infusion of cisplatin (40 mg/m2) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (400mg/m2/day) on days 1-5, every 2 weeks, plus concurrent radiation (RT). The total RT dose was initially 61.2, but was lowered to multiple-field irradiation with 50.4 Gy to decrease esophagitis and late toxicity. Consequently, the number of cycles of DCF administered during RT was modified from 4 to 3. After DCF-R, patients received at least 2 cycles of DCF (docetaxel 40 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2on days 1-5, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was the clinical complete response rate (cCRR). Secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Results: 42 patients (36 men, 6 women) were enrolled. The median age was 62 years (range: 46-75). PS 0/1/2 was 14/25/3. TNM classification T4M0/non-T4M1LYM/T4M1LYM was 20/12/10. The total scheduled dose of RT 61.2Gy /50.4Gy was 12/30 patients. The RR was 90.5% and the cCRR was 52.4% (95% CI:37.3-67.5%). As of January 2013, the median PFS was 11.1 months and the median survival time was 23.1 months. Grade 3 or higher major toxicities comprised leukopenia (71.4%), neutropenia (57.2%), anemia (16.7%), febrile neutropenia (38.1%), anorexia (31.0%), and esophagitis (28.6%). There was one treatment-related death caused by aspiration pneumonia. Grade 3 or higher late toxicities comprised one pericardial effusion (Grade 4), one case of esophagitis (Grade 3), and one case of thoracic aortic aneurysm (Grade 3). Conclusions: DCF-R frequently caused myelosuppression, but was highly active and suggested be a promising regimen in AEC. Clinical trial information: 000002029.
Phase I/II trial of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Authors: Satake Hironaga , Tahara Makoto , Mochizuki Satoshi , Zenda Sadamoto , Kojima Takashi , Bando Hideaki , Yamazaki Tomoko , Kato Ken , Iwasa Satoru , Honma Yoshitaka , Hara Hiroki , Yokota Tomoya , Hamauchi Satoshi , Kiyota Naomi , Kii Takayuki , Chin Keisho , Ohtsu Atsushi
Published: March 2020

4074

Background: Standard of care for unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, its survival remains limited. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU (DCF) demonstrated promising activity with pathological complete response (CR) of 22% for resectable stage II/III ESCC (Hara H et.al, ASCO 2012). This study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy with DCF followed by CRT in patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC. Methods: Eligibility criteria included clinically T4 and/or M1 lymph node (LYM) ESCC, PS 0-1, and 20-70 years old. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 70 mg/m2, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1 and fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5, repeated every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on days 64 and 92, and fluorouracil 700 mg/m2on days 64 to 67 and 92 to 95 concurrently with radiotherapy (60Gy in 30 fractions, 5 days/week). Results: From August 2009 to November 2011, 33 patients were enrolled.There were 16 pts with T4M0 disease, 13 with nonT4M1 LYM, and 4 with T4M1 LYM.Most grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (66%), leukopenia (39%), anorexia (18%), dysphasia (12%), nausea (9%), febrile neutropenia (6%), and hyponatremia (6%) during induction chemotherapy. Most grade 3 or 4 toxicities were leukopenia (27%), neutropenia (20%), dysphasia (17%), anorexia (13%), esophagitis (13%), nausea (10%), and febrile neutropenia (3%) during CRT. No treatment related death was observed. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 88% (29/33). The overall response rate after completion of induction chemotherapy was 61%. Eleven pts (38%) achieved CR after completion of protocol treatment. With a median follow-up period of 14 months, 1y-PFS and 1y-OS are 38.5 and 78.6 %, respectively. Of a total of 33 patients, eighteen patients (55%) received secondary treatment. Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy with DCF followed by CRT in unresectable locally advanced ESCC was well tolerated. Although these data are preliminay, this approach warrants further evaluation. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003370.
Interim safety analysis of a phase III trial with 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-FU (ECF) in patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric/oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) cancer: The AIO-sto-0210 FLOT4 study.
Authors: Pauligk Claudia , Meiler Johannes , Hofheinz Ralf Dieter , Kopp Hans-Georg , Mayer Frank , Schmalenberg Harald , Luley Kim , Haag Georg Martin , Schmiegel Wolff H. , Homann Nils , Probst Stephan , Koenigsmann Michael , Prasnikar Nicole , Trojan Jorg , Egger Matthias , Mahlberg Rolf , Heike Michael , Tannapfel Andrea , Jäger Elke , Al-Batran Salah-Eddin
Published: March 2020

4079

Background: Perioperative ECF is a standard treatment for localized gastric/OGJ adenocarcinoma. However, 5-year survival rate remains below 40%. The FLOT regimen is an effective combination with pathologic response rates in the 15% range. This phase III study compares both regimens in resectable stages. Methods: Pts are stratified by different baseline criteria and randomized to either 3 + 3 perioperative cycles of ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m2, d1; cisplatin 60 mg/m², d1; 5-FU 200 mg/m², d1-d21, qd21) or 4 + 4 cycles of perioperative FLOT (docetaxel 50mg/m2, d1; 5-FU 2600 mg/m², d1; leucovorin 200 mg/m², d1; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², d1, qd14). 5-FU can be replaced by capecitabine in the ECF-arm (ECX). Central pathology is performed. This is a preplanned safety analysis after 300 patients. Results: The ongoing studyhas enrolled 380 of planned 590 pts, so far. 305 pts were included in this analysis. Median age is 62 yrs; 78% of pts are male. The primaries were gastric in 44.9%, OGJ in 50.4% and not evaluable/documented in 4.7% of pts. 281 pts were eligible for safety analyses. Median no. of preoperative cycles was 3 and 4 with ECF/ECX and FLOT, respectively, 35.9% vs. 44.6% of pts (ECF/ECX vs. FLOT) started postoperative chemotherapy (ct) and 22.5% vs 33.1% received all planned cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 28.0% of ECF/ECX and 45.3% of FLOT pts (p=.0026). Thromboembolic events occurred in 14.1% vs. 5.8% in pts with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT (p=.027). Serious adverse events occurred in 52.1% vs. 47.5% of pts with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT (p=.48). Preoperative delay/interruptions of ct were observed in 71.1% vs. 56.8% of pts with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT (p=.013). Dose modifications of preoperative ct were performed in 27.5% vs. 20.1% of treatment cycles with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT, respectively. 197 pts have undergone surgery so far. Severe surgical morbidity was similar in both arms (ECF/ECX, 19.8%; FLOT, 16.8%). Surgical mortality was observed in 4 and 2 pts with ECF/ECX and FLOT. Toxic deaths were observed in 1 pt each. Conclusions: Perioperative FLOT is feasible and safe. Clinical trial information: NCT01216644.
Final results of AGITG ATTAX3 study: Randomized phase II study of weekly docetaxel (T), cisplatin, and fluoropyrimidine (F) with or without panitumumab (P) in advanced esophagogastric (OG) cancer.
Authors: Tebbutt Niall C. , Price Timothy Jay , Sjoquist Katrin Marie , Veillard Anne-Sophie , Hall Merryn , Ferraro Danielle Angela , Wong Nicole , Pavlakis Nick , Strickland Andrew , Varma Suresh Chandra , Cooray Prasad , Young Rosemary , Underhill Craig , Shannon Jennifer Anne , Ganju Vinod , Gebski Val ,   Australasian GI Trials Group
Published: March 2020

4081

Background: This randomized phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of P, a fully human mAb against the epidermal growth factor receptor combined with T-based chemotherapy in advanced OG cancer. Methods: Eligible pts had histologically confirmed metastatic OG cancer (adeno-carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) were ≥18 years of age, PS 0-2, with adequate renal, haematologic and liver function with measurable disease. All pts provided informed consent. Selection was not based on kras determination. Pts received T 30mg/m2 d1,8, C 60mg/m2 d1 and F; investigator choice of 5FU infusion 160mg/m2/d or capecitabine 500mg/m2bd continuous ±P 9 mg/kg d1 q3w. Treatment was administered for 8 cycles or until PD. The primary endpoint was response rate according to RECIST (1.1) assessed q6w. Planned enrolment target was 100 pts. Stratification variables included histology, PS and choice of F. Results: From April 2010 to November 2011, 77 pts were enrolled from 15 institutions. A safety alert from the REAL3 study (also involving P in OG cancer) prompted an unplanned review of data from ATTAX3 by the IDMC. The IDMC found no evidence of adverse outcomes associated with P, but as it did not appear that P would significantly improve efficacy, they recommended cessation of the study to new enrolment. Previously enrolled pts were treated and followed according to protocol. Median follow up is 24m. Treatment arms were well balanced; median age 59, 64y, male 77%, 87%, PS0-1 95%,90%, adenocarcinoma 90%,90%, capecitabine 67%, 66% for TCF/TCF-P, respectively. Common grade 3/4 toxicities include infection 18%,24%, febrile neutropenia 10%, 5%, anorexia 10%, 24%, nausea 18%,30%, stomatitis 3%,5%, diarrhoea 15%,24% , acneiform rash 0%, 8%, fatigue 18%, 30%, hypomagnesemia 10%, 16% for TCF/TCF-P. Efficacy outcomes are summarized in Table. Conclusions: The addition of P to T-based chemotherapy in advanced OG cancer did not improve efficacy and was associated with an increase in some toxicities. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12609000109202. [Table: see text]