Temporal Stability of Music Perception and Appraisal Scores of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients
Authors: Gfeller Kate , Jiang Dingfeng , Oleson Jacob J. , Driscoll Virginia , Knutson John F. 
Published: February 2010

Background:An extensive body of literature indicates that cochlear implants (CIs) are effective in supporting speech perception of persons with severe to profound hearing losses who do not benefit to any great extent from conventional hearing aids. Adult CI recipients tend to
show significant improvement in speech perception within 3 mo following implantation as a result of mere experience. Furthermore, CI recipients continue to show modest improvement as long as 5 yr postimplantation. In contrast, data taken from single testing protocols of music
perception and appraisal indicate that CIs are less than ideal in transmitting important structural features of music, such as pitch, melody, and timbre. However, there is presently little information documenting changes in music perception or appraisal over extended time as a result of mere
experience.Purpose:This study examined two basic questions: (1) Do adult CI recipients show significant improvement in perceptual acuity or appraisal of specific music listening tasks when tested in two consecutive years? (2) If there are tasks for which CI recipients show significant
improvement with time, are there particular demographic variables that predict those CI recipients most likely to show improvement with extended CI use?Research Design:A longitudinal cohort study. Implant recipients return annually for visits to the clinic.Study Sample:The study
included 209 adult cochlear implant recipients with at least 9 mo implant experience before their first year measurement.Data Collection and Analysis:Outcomes were measured on the patient's annual visit in two consecutive years. Paired t-tests were used to test for significant
improvement from one year to the next. Those variables demonstrating significant improvement were subjected to regression analyses performed to detect the demographic variables useful in predicting said improvement.Results:There were no significant differences in music perception outcomes
as a function of type of device or processing strategy used. Only familiar melody recognition (FMR) and recognition of melody excerpts with lyrics (MERT-L) showed significant improvement from one year to the next. After controlling for the baseline value, hearing aid use, months of use, music
listening habits after implantation, and formal musical training in elementary school were significant predictors of FMR improvement. Bilateral CI use, formal musical training in high school and beyond, and a measure of sequential cognitive processing were significant predictors of MERT-L
improvement.Conclusion:These adult CI recipients as a result of mere experience demonstrated fairly consistent music perception and appraisal on measures gathered in two consecutive years. Gains made tend to be modest, and can be associated with characteristics such as use of hearing
aids, listening experiences, or bilateral use (in the case of lyrics). These results have implications for counseling of CI recipients with regard to realistic expectations and strategies for enhancing music perception and enjoyment.