Blood pressure responses to isometric handgrip exercise and post-exercise ischemia in females with no/low or high severity hot flash symptoms
Authors: Hughes Morgan , Harvey Ronée , Pruter Wyatt , Dillon Gabrielle , Baker Sarah 
Published: May 2024

Introduction: Severe menopausal hot flash symptoms are linked to the development of cardiovascular disease. Exaggerated blood pressure responses to exercise are also associated with an increased risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if females with more severe hot flash symptoms exhibit greater blood pressure responses to exercise compared to those with minimal menopausal hot flashes. We aimed to determine if there is a difference in the pressor response to isometric exercise between females with severe hot flash symptoms compared to females with no/low hot flash symptoms. We hypothesized that there will be exaggerated blood pressure responses to isometric handgrip exercise (IHG) and post-exercise ischemia (PEI) in females who have severe menopausal hot flashes compared to females with no/low hot flashes. Methods: We studied 19 female participants (age: 51±5yrs) with no history of cardiovascular disease or hypertension. The Menopausal Rating Scale (MRS) was used to assess the hot flash symptom severity and to group the participants into no/low (no-or-mild on MRS) or high (moderate-or-severe on MRS) hot flash symptom groups. Continuous blood pressure (BP) was measured via photoplethysmography and calibrated relative to a brachial arm cuff pressure. After 2 minutes of quiet rest, participants performed 2 minutes of IHG at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, followed by 2 minutes of PEI on the exercising arm to isolate the metaboreflex. The severity groups were compared via independent samples t-tests. Results: There were 13 females in the no/low group and 6 females in the high group. Baseline heart rate (HR, no/low: 60±11 vs high: 58±8bpm), systolic (SBP, no/low:129±18 vs high: 120±14mmHg), diastolic (DBP, no/low: 72±12 vs high: 63±7mmHg) and mean BP (MBP, no/low: 91±11 vs high 82±9mmHg) were not different between groups. There were no differences in the pressor responses to IHG between groups (HR: no/low: Δ6±5 vs high: 5±4bpm, p=0.425; SBP: no/low: Δ9±5 vs high: 11±6mmHg, p=0.408; DBP: no/low: Δ5±3 vs high: 7±4mmHg, p=0.182; MBP: no/low: Δ6±3 vs high: 8±4mmHg, p=0.253). There was also no difference in the pressor response to PEI between groups (HR: no/low: Δ6±6 vs high: 4±2bpm, p=0.554; SBP: no/low: Δ11±6 vs high: 16±9mmHg, p=0.191; DBP: no/low: Δ5±3 vs high: 8±6mmHg, p=0.298; MBP: no/low: Δ7±4 vs high: 11±7mmHg, p=0.280). Conclusion: The current data show no differences in the blood pressure responses to IHG or PEI between females with different menopausal hot flash symptom severities. This suggests that pressor responses to an IHG exercise and the metaboreflex may not be notable contributors to the increased cardiovascular risk in females with severe menopausal hot flashes.

NIH: K01 HL148144, NCATS UL1 TR000135, UL1 TR002377; AHA: 898649.

This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.