Quality assessment of the Ozone_cci Climate Research Data Package (release 2017) – Part 2: Ground-based validation of nadir ozone profile data products
Authors: Keppens Arno , Lambert Jean-Christopher , Granville José , Hubert Daan , Verhoelst Tijl , Compernolle Steven , Latter Barry , Kerridge Brian , Siddans Richard , Boynard Anne , Hadji-Lazaro Juliette , Clerbaux Cathy , Wespes Catherine , Hurtmans Daniel R. , Coheur Pierre-François , van Peet Jacob C. A. , van der A Ronald J , Garane Katerina , Koukouli Maria Elissavet , Balis Dimitris S. , Delcloo Andy , Kivi Rigel , Stübi Réné , Godin-Beekmann Sophie , Van Roozendael Michel , Zehner Claus 
Published: June 2018

Abstract. Atmospheric ozone plays a key role in
air quality and the radiation budget of the Earth, both directly and through
its chemical influence on other trace gases. Assessments of the atmospheric
ozone distribution and associated climate change therefore demand accurate
vertically resolved ozone observations with both stratospheric and
tropospheric sensitivity, on both global and regional scales, and both in the
long term and at shorter timescales. Such observations have been acquired by
two series of European nadir-viewing ozone profilers, namely the
scattered-light UV–visible spectrometers of the GOME family, launched
regularly since 1995 (GOME, SCIAMACHY, OMI, GOME-2A/B, TROPOMI, and the
upcoming Sentinel-5 series), and the thermal infrared emission sounders of
the IASI type, launched regularly since 2006 (IASI on Metop platforms and the
upcoming IASI-NG on Metop-SG). In particular, several Level-2 retrieved,
Level-3 monthly gridded, and Level-4 assimilated nadir ozone profile data
products have been improved and harmonized in the context of the ozone
project of the European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative (ESA
Ozone_cci). To verify their fitness for purpose, these ozone datasets must
undergo a comprehensive quality assessment (QA), including (a) detailed
identification of their geographical, vertical, and temporal domains of
validity; (b) quantification of their potential bias, noise, and drift and
their dependences on major influence quantities; and (c) assessment of the
mutual consistency of data from different sounders. For this purpose we have
applied to the Ozone_cci Climate Research Data Package (CRDP) released in
2017 the versatile QA and validation system Multi-TASTE, which has been
developed in the context of several heritage projects (ESA's Multi-TASTE,
EUMETSAT's O3M-SAF, and the European Commission's FP6 GEOmon and FP7 QA4ECV).
This work, as the second in a series of four Ozone_cci validation papers,
reports for the first time on data content studies, information content
studies and ground-based validation for both the GOME- and IASI-type climate
data records combined. The ground-based reference measurements have been
provided by the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition
Change (NDACC), NASA's Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesonde
programme (SHADOZ), and other ozonesonde and lidar stations contributing to
the World Meteorological Organisation's Global Atmosphere Watch (WMO GAW).
The nadir ozone profile CRDP quality assessment reveals that all nadir ozone
profile products under study fulfil the GCOS user requirements in terms of
observation frequency and horizontal and vertical resolution. Yet all
L2 observations also show sensitivity outliers in the UTLS and are strongly
correlated vertically due to substantial averaging kernel fluctuations that
extend far beyond the kernel's 15 km FWHM. The CRDP typically does not
comply with the GCOS user requirements in terms of total uncertainty and
decadal drift, except for the UV–visible L4 dataset. The drift values of the
L2 GOME and OMI, the L3 IASI, and the L4 assimilated products are found to be
overall insignificant, however, and applying appropriate altitude-dependent
bias and drift corrections make the data fit for climate and atmospheric
composition monitoring and modelling purposes. Dependence of the Ozone_cci
data quality on major influence quantities – resulting in data screening
suggestions to users – and perspectives for the Copernicus Sentinel missions
are additionally discussed.