bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025 huggingface dataset:
Characterizing the genomic landscape of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Gonzalez Conchas Galileo Arturo , O'Kane Grainne M. , Denroche Robert Edward , Jang Gun Ho , Fischer Sandra , Dodd Anna , Picardo Sarah Louise , Holter Spring , Wilson Julie , Zogopoulos George , Elimova Elena , Prince Rebecca M. , Jang Raymond Woo-Jun , Moore Malcolm J. , Biagi James Joseph , Notta Faiyaz , Grant Robert C , Gallinger Steven , Tsang Erica S , Knox Jennifer J.
Published: January 2024

697

Background: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) accounts for approximately 30% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). Optimal management for LAPC is controversial and combination treatments are extrapolated from treatment guidelines for metastatic disease. The biological underpinnings of LAPC remain unclear, although the loss of tumor suppressor SMAD4 has been associated with metastatic disease. Here we characterize the genomic landscape of LAPC in a large series of prospectively sequenced PDAC. Methods: Clinical, genomic and survival data were obtained from the COMPASS trial (NCT02750657), a prospective multi-institutional study that included patients with treatment-naïve advanced PDAC, with predominantly metastatic cases due to ease of biopsy. Fresh tumor tissue was acquired by percutaneous core biopsy for real-time whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing (RNAseq). Laser capture micro-dissection was performed for all cases. Response to therapy was assessed every 8 weeks, and patients were followed prospectively. Results: Of 268 patients (268 with available WGS and 253 with RNAseq), 37 (14%) had LAPC. Baseline epidemiological variables were similar, with no differences between sex, age, smoking status, or history of diabetes. Patients with LAPC had a lower BMI (median 22 vs 24, p=0.005) and lower baseline CA19-9 (median 488 vs 2551, p=0.002) than metastatic cases. All patients with LAPC had a low (<2 points) Gustave Roussy Immune Score, previously shown to be prognostic in our dataset. Driver alternations were similar in LAPC and metastatic cases with no differences in SMAD4 loss between the two groups; however, major imbalances in mutant KRAS were absent in the LAPC group. The burden of SNVs, indels and SVs was significantly lower in LAPC (Table). All LAPC cases demonstrated a classical RNA subtype, compared to 23% in metastatic cases ( p=0.0008). Median OS measured 12.5 and 8.3 months for LAPC and metastatic cases, respectively (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.89, p=0.003). In addition, when measuring CD8+ T cell infiltration by IHC using median cut-off values, primary site biopsies had a higher CD8+ T cell infiltrate compared to metastatic sites (77% vs 56% CD8-high, respectively, p=0.01). Conclusions: These integrated genomic, RNA subtyping and early immunophenotyping results suggest that LAPC demonstrate less genomic instability and classical programming. Further study will delineate how these genomic differences, along with better clinical features, may influence treatment decision-making and design of future clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02750657 . [Table: see text]
Impact of site of metastases in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Arshad Adeel , Zhao Songzhu , Wei Lai , Stephens Julie , Manne Ashish , Noonan Anne M. , Rahman Shafia
Published: January 2024

708

Background: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has a 5-year survival rate of 3%. We examined the clinical significance of the metastatic site on outcomes in mPDAC using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: We analyzed the data on mPDAC from SEER database from 2010-2020 and categorized into three groups: mPDAC with, liver-only (LO) metastasis (mets), multi-organ mets including the liver (IL), and multi-organ mets excluding the liver (EL). Patient demographics and disease characteristics were summarized using the mean for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from time of diagnosis to death or censored at a loss to follow-up. The survival curve was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank p-value was reported. The Cox regression model was used to study the association of site of distant metastasis on overall survival, controlling for potential confounders (age, race, treatment, etc.) Results: We identified 22642 patients with mPDAC; 15844, 4250, and 2548 with LO, IL, EL mets respectively. The mean age at diagnosis was 66 years with the majority being white (78.4%), non-Hispanic (87.1%), and from metropolitan counties (88.5%). The median OS was 4 months, 3 months, and 6 months (log-rank p<0.001) for LO, IL, and EL groups respectively, with 2-year survival being 4.84%, 2.56% and 7.89% respectively (log-rank p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a higher risk of mortality in LO (31.5%, hazards ratio (HR)=1.315, p<0.001) and IL groups (69.2% HR=1.692, p<0.001) than EL group (Table). Conclusions: The site of distant metastasis is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with mPDAC, with liver-only mets or multi-organ mets including liver having worse OS than extrahepatic mets. [Table: see text]
Gastrointestinal cancer trends in the Hispanic population: A SEER database population study (2000-2019).
Authors: Hechter Sharon , Nikiforov Ivan , Greenberg David B.
Published: January 2024

725

Background: Cancer continues to be the leading cause of death in the Hispanic population. Gastrointestinal cancer surveillance data in Hispanic individuals has only recently become available in the last 3 decades. Differences in incidence rates among Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) need further elucidation. In this study, we analyzed trends in Hispanics and NHW populations across multiple gastrointestinal cancers. Methods: Gastrointestinal cancers (liver, colon and rectum, pancreas, esophagus, gallbladder, stomach, small intestine, anus, anal canal and anorectum) diagnosed between 2000-2019 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) Database. We calculated incidence rates, confidence intervals and incidence rate ratios. Rates are per 100,000 and age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population. Rate ratios are the rounded rates in Hispanic individuals divided by the rounded rates in NHWs. Results: There was a higher incidence of liver, gallbladder, and stomach cancers among Hispanics when compared to NHWs between the years 2000-2019. Liver cancer incidence rate is (11.5 per 100,000) in Hispanics compared with (6.3 per 100, 000) in NHWs with an incidence rate ratio of 1.8. Gallbladder cancer incidence rate is (2.2 per 100,000) in Hispanics compared with (0.9 per 100,000) in NHWs with an incidence rate ratio of 2.4. Stomach cancer is (10.9 per 100,000) in Hispanics compared with (5.7 per 100,000) in NHWs with an incidence rate ratio of 1.9. The lowest incidence rate ratio was seen for anus, anal canal and anorectum cancers in Hispanics compared to NHWs. The incidence rate is (1.2 per 100,000) in Hispanics compared with (2.1 per 100,000) in NHWs with an incidence rate ratio of 0.6. Remaining cancers had incidence rate ratios less than 1.0 and were more likely to occur in NHWs. Conclusions: This study illustrates differing incidence rates of multiple gastrointestinal cancers among Hispanics compared to NHWs. Liver, gallbladder and stomach cancer incidence rates in Hispanics is double that of NHWs. Interestingly, the remaining gastrointestinal cancers had higher incidence rates among NHWs. Further research is warranted to understand the differences in cancer risk within the Hispanic population as well as healthcare access, language barriers and cultural differences that may play a role.[Table: see text]
Liquid biopsy-based comprehensive genomic profiling to reveal mutational landscape in real-world patients with gastrointestinal cancer.
Authors: Tang Haoran , Zhang Xiaogang , Xie Feng , Zhang Yue , Jia Shidong
Published: January 2024

735

Background: Molecular characteristics hold substantial clinical significance in cancer. Previous research has elucidated the molecular classification of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, leveraging biomarkers like gene alterations, MSI, EBV status, and chromosomal instability. However, most of these studies relied on tissue biopsies. Limited investigations have been documented regarding the characterization of molecular profiles through liquid biopsy. Here we present a comprehensive genomic profiling study conducted on advanced GI cancer patients using blood samples. Methods: This prospective study is a part of a global initiative focused on molecular biomarker screening across various solid tumors. Here we report the early result of 106 unresectable GI cancer patients, encompassing those with advanced disease or experiencing relapse after prior treatments. The cohort comprises 66 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, 34 gastric cancer (GC) patients, and 6 esophageal cancer (EC) patients. Each patient contributed a 10-mL blood sample for comprehensive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis. The study employed PredicineCARE, a 152-gene, NGS-based liquid biopsy assay, to profile somatic gene variations within this patient population. Results: The study revealed a total of 1,597 somatic mutations, with 1,077 occurring in CRC, 448 in GC, and 72 in EC. Additionally, 722 gene copy number variants were identified, with 288 in CRC, 351 in GC, and 83 in EC patients. In CRC, the most frequently altered genes (prevalence > 20%) included TP53 (58%), APC (45%), KRAS (33%), and BRCA2 (22%). Conversely, in GC, the most altered genes were TP53 (59%), TERT (35%), FAT1 (29%), ARID1A (26%), and FGFR4 (24%). Among the 6 EC patients, 3 carried TP53 variations, with variations in APC (N=2), ERCC5 (N=2), FAT1 (N=2), and EGFR (N=1) also observed. The mutation burden in CRC (median 3.73 mut/Mb) and GC (median 3.57 mut/Mb) displayed no significant differences. However, the mutation burden in CRC was significantly higher than that in EC (2.24 mut/Mb) (p=0.04). A similar pattern was observed between GC and EC but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.10) due to limitations in cohort size. Furthermore, the assay identified patients carrying both germline and somatic mutations related to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). In CRC patients, 5 had MLH1 germline mutations, 6 had MSH2 mutations (5 were germline), 4 had MSH6 germline mutations, 2 had PMS2 somatic mutations, and 1 had an EPCAM germline mutation. While in GC patients, 2 had MLH1 germline mutations, 1 had an MSH6 mutation, and 1 had a PMS2 somatic mutation. Conclusions: This study elucidated the comprehensive mutational landscape of advanced gastrointestinal cancer through liquid biopsy, thereby contributing novel biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and facilitating targeted therapy mechanism investigations.
Role of proton pump inhibitors in immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis.
Authors: Pradeep Roshini , Moshtaghi Afsheen , Khan Hamza , Walenga Ann K , Rocca Neychelle , Kudelka Andrzej Piotr
Published: January 2024

743

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to be beneficial in symptomatic control of gastroesophageal reflux disease and gastritis which can be a common complication of various cancers specifically gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Microscopic colitis development has been studied to be associated with PPI use. Immune checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) colitis is a known adverse effect of Inhibitors of Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1). Previous studies have also shown use of PPIs and NSAIDs are common risk factors which can exacerbate ICI Colitis caused by Inhibitors of PD-1 and PD-L1. This study is designed to observe association of certain drugs especially PPIs in ICI colitis. Methods: This is a single center, retrospective, and observational study that investigated patients treated with PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitors for management of any type of cancer between January 2022- September 2023. A list of patients treated with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors was obtained from Inpatient pharmacy records followed by retrospective chart review to look for symptoms of colitis and other medications used by each patient. Primary outcome was to observe the role of PPIs in ICI colitis. Secondary outcomes were to observe the number of patients with GI cancers on PPIs who developed colitis. We also observed the effect of NSAIDs use as a potential risk factor in the population with ICI colitis. Results: The data consisted of 93 patients of which 17 (18.3%) developed colitis. Among this population 13 (76.5%) was ICI colitis, 2 (11.7%) was diverticular colitis and 2 (11.7%) was Infectious colitis. PPI use was seen in 3 out of 13 patients (23%) with ICI colitis. Patients with any type of GI cancer who developed colitis was 5 (25%) and PPI use in ICI colitis was seen in 2 out of these 5 patients. NSAIDs use was seen in 3 (23%) patients with ICI colitis. Conclusions: We did not observe significant association between PPI use and ICI colitis. ICI use becoming increasingly common in oncologic population, larger studies may be needed to further evaluate risk factors associated with ICI colitis in this population.
Phase Ib adaptive study of dasatinib for the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab.
Authors: Noonan Anne M. , Schnell Patrick , Trunzo Danielle , Thornton Wendy , Malalur Pannaga G. , Manne Ashish , Abushahin Laith I. , Rahman Shafia , Jin Ning , Hays John L. , Elkhatib Rifat T. , Mittra Arjun , Roychowdhury Sameek , Lustberg Maryam B. , Sparreboom Alex , Hu Shuiying
Published: January 2024

745

Background: Neurotoxicity is one of the most significant and disabling side effects of oxaliplatin (OX) and frequently limits the amount of OX that can be used. OX uptake by organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) into mouse and rat dorsal root ganglia is a prerequisite for OX-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). Preclinical data in rat and mouse models from our group showed that by inhibiting YES1, pre-treatment with dasatinib (D) inactivated OCT2 and prevented acute and chronic OIPN. A phase I trial is ongoing investigating addition of D prior to OX to prevent OIPN. Methods: This was a Bayesian Phase 1b dose-finding study with adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs in patients (pts) with GI cancers who are candidates for mFOLFOX6 ± bevacizumab [NCT04164069]. Pts received chemotherapy on day 1 and 15 schedule, every 28 days. D was administered at one of 2 dose levels – 100mg or 140mg PO, given 24 hours and 30 mins prior to OX on C1D14, C1D15 respectively and repeated on C1D28 and C2D1. During cycle 1, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data was obtained at baseline, during, and up to 24 hours after D or OX administration. Recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) was defined as the lowest intermittent dose of D that affects serum biomarkers of OCT2, including methylnicotinamide (NMN) and creatinine, by ≥2-fold without influencing the clearance of oxaliplatin by ≥20%. CIPN20 questionnaire was completed prior to each dose of FOLFOX on screening through to C3D1. Weakly informative Jeffreys priors were used for response and toxicity probabilities, with the latter constrained to be increasing with dose. Results: 13 pts were screened. 5 pts enrolled in cohort 1 (D 100 mg), 2 in cohort 2 (D 140 mg) and 2 in cohort 3 (D 140mg). 6 pts were not evaluable for the efficacy and toxicity endpoints due to screen failure or early study discontinuation. 7 patients were evaluated for efficacy biomarkers and 6 pts were evaluated for both efficacy biomarkers and toxicity. There were no DLTs observed in any cohort. 4/7 pts had ≥2-fold increase in AUC of NMN, and 3/7 pts had ≥2-fold increase in AUC of creatinine. 6/7 pts had ≤20% change in the clearance of OX. Conclusions: Addition of D 100mg or 140mg to traditional FOLFOX regimen was safe and in the majority of pts appeared to alter serum biomarkers of OCT2 in a manner suggesting inhibition of OX uptake in the DRG. 140mg was the chosen RP2D. A randomized phase II study is planned using D to prevent OPIN. Clinical trial information: NCT04164069 . [Table: see text]
Use of tumor-informed ctDNA across gastrointestinal cancers.
Authors: Reilley Matthew , Kunk Paul Raymond , Le Tri Minh , Rehman Muneeb
Published: January 2024

758

Background: In colorectal cancer (CRC), the use of ctDNA for the purpose of early recurrence detection and prognostication is established, and multiple studies are testing its utility for guiding adjuvant therapy decisions. Tumor informed testing can be performed in clinical situations where adequate tissue is available for next-generation sequencing (NGS). Increasingly, ctDNA testing is being used clinically for colorectal cancer patients and other gastrointestinal (GI) cancers when there is an appropriate clinical scenario and adequate tumor tissue is available for sequencing. Methods: We identified GI cancer patients treated at our institution where Signatera (Natera) testing was ordered and performed between 2020 – 2023. We included all patients for whom testing was ordered. Then, among patients with any result further analyzed results by disease type, stage, and results. We examined clinical rationale for testing and whether results informed subsequent decisions. Results: A total of 99 GI cancer patients for whom ctDNA testing was ordered were identified. 80 patients had at least 1 ctDNA result including 68 colorectal patients and 12 other GI cancers (anal, bile duct, esophagogastric, pancreatic, and small bowel). Among patients with measurable ctDNA, at the most recent testing timepoint 16 had levels that met criteria for positive detection, while 64 were undetectable. Most commonly, testing was ordered in stage II/III CRC patients for post-operative surveillance. Other clinical use scenarios included 1) surveillance/treatment monitoring in oligometastatic CRC, 2) surveillance in non-metastatic esophagogastric cancer, 3) treatment monitoring in MSI-H/immunotherapy sensitive GI cancers. For at least 18 patients, results were a factor in shared clinical decision making between patients and providers. Conclusions: We found ctDNA monitoring is most commonly used in the adjuvant setting for CRC patients which is best supported by existing studies. Our data demonstrates that tumor informed testing can be successful in other GI cancers for both surveillance and therapy monitoring. Given the broad and rapid adoption of this technology, there needs to be continued efforts for both prospective validation studies and retrospective real world studies to guide clinical practice.
Gender disparities in the National Institutes of Health funding for gastrointestinal oncology.
Authors: Khan Sara , Sohail Aruba , Ukrani Janta , Zahid Ibrahim , Eshaghi Faraz , Khan Kainat , Thakore Shaival , Jaglal Michael Vishal , Farooq Muhammad Zain
Published: January 2024

763

Background: Traditionally, there has been an under-representation of women in academic fields, thus making them less likely to receive grants. This study examines the trend of funding allocation of R01 grants in Gastrointestinal oncology by the National Institutes of Health with specific focus on the distribution of funding between gender. Methods: The data were retrieved from the NIH RePORTER (Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditure) using gastrointestinal oncology-related search terms from 2018-2021. The gender was categorized using Genderize. The number of citations, publications, H-index, and seniority were obtained from Scopus and Web of Science in December 2022. Consumer Price Index was used to adjust funding amount to 2021 equivalent U.S. dollars. Linear regression was used for analysis. Results: A total of 1426 NIH-funded R01 grants amounting to 626.6 million were awarded for gastrointestinal oncology research. Women (n=391; 27.4% [95% CI: 25.1%-29.7%]) received fewer grants than men (n=1035; 72.6% [95% CI: 70.3%-74.9%]). From 2018-2021, there was no significant difference in the number of grants awarded among both men (263 to 259, p=0.65) and women (90 to 105, p=0.12). Similarly, there was no significant change in the grant amount (in millions) awarded among men (114.7 to 111.2, p=0.86) and women (39.8 to 47.9, p=0.19). Colorectal cancer accounted for the greatest proportion of grants (n=528; 37.0% [95% CI: 34.5%-39.5%]), amounting to 235.9 million. Of the 481 co-PIs, 405 (84.2% [95% CI: 80.9%-87.5%]) were men and 76 (15.8% [95% CI: 12.5%-19.1%]) were women. Male PIs as compared to female PIs had a higher h-index (52 vs 40, p<0.001), a higher number of publications (160 vs 111, p<0.001), and were cited more (13324 vs 6371, p<0.001). Funding amount was significantly associated with gender (β=0.06, p=0.02), number of publications (β=0.17, p<0.01) and institution (p<0.01). Conclusions: Our analysis shows continued gender disparity as only 27% of total R01 grants towards gastrointestinal oncology were granted to females during the fiscal years of 2018-2021. Thus, a collaborative effort is needed to close the divide and advance gender equality. [Table: see text]
Real-world adoption of 3 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin chemotherapy in patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC).
Authors: Krishnan Tharani , Solar Vasconcelos Joao Paulo , Lim Howard J , Loree Jonathan M. , Davies Janine Marie , Gill Karamjit , Gill Sharlene
Published: January 2024

83

Background: Based on the IDEA analysis, 3 months (mos) of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with CAPOX has emerged as an option for both low-risk and high-risk stage III CRC. This has resource utilization, cost and toxicity benefits (particularly less neurotoxicity) without compromising efficacy. This study examines the patterns of uptake of CAPOX vs FOLFOX and duration of ACT in a contemporary post-COVID real-world cohort of patients (pts) in the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada. Methods: The provincial pharmacy database was used to identify pts with resected stage III CRC who received adjuvant CAPOX or FOLFOX between January 2021 and December 2022. Pts with rectal cancer requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded. Demographic, tumor, and treatment information was collected. “High-risk features” were defined as pT4 or pN2 tumors. “Urban” setting was defined based on the population size of the regional health authority. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed to examine baseline characteristics and Fisher’s exact test was used to examine univariate associations. Results: 452 pts were included, of which 234 (52%) and 218 (48%) were planned to receive 3 and 6 mos of ACT respectively (see table). Within the 3 mos group, 226 (97%) received CAPOX. Within the 6 mos group, there was a 51%/49% split between CAPOX/FOLFOX. By univariate analysis, factors associated with 3 mos of CAPOX vs 6 mos of ACT were age >70y (P=0.039), low/intermediate grade (P=0.005) and low-risk stage III disease (P<0.0001). 29% of pts planned for 6 mos of oxaliplatin ACT had low-risk disease, with 52% of these receiving CAPOX. Conclusions: 3 mos of adjuvant CAPOX is an accepted option for nearly all pts with stage III disease with consequent less neurotoxicity and fewer treatment visits. Yet, in this contemporary cohort, use of 3 mos of adjuvant CAPOX remains low and is associated with older age and low-risk disease. 6 mos of oxaliplatin is still being offered to pts with low-risk disease. Exploration of patient preferences, real-world treatment and time toxicities, and resource costs may improve more widespread adoption of 3 mos of adjuvant CAPOX in stage III CRC. [Table: see text]
Fruquintinib with PD-1 inhibitors versus TAS-102 with bevacizumab in late-line mCRC: A retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching.
Authors: Li Rongrong , Yang Xiao-Lin , Liu Zhen-yang , Zhou Hui-Jun , Yin Xian-Li , Zeng De-Yu , Shen Hua , Zeng Yi-Dong , Xiang Fang , Li Ke , Jiang Shao-Feng , Liu Wu
Published: January 2024

95

Background: Fruquintinib with PD-1 inhibitors (FP) and TAS-102 with bevacizumab (TB) are two common therapies for patients with previous-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it’s still not clear that which therapy can bring better prognosis. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in Hunan Cancer Hospital. Patients (pts) with mCRC who had received at least the 2nd line treatment were eligible. Propensity score (PS) would be calculated to balance the baseline characteristics of two arms. Overall survival (OS) was set as the primary endpoint. Results: From July 2019 to October 2022, 106 eligible pts in total were enrolled. According to the treatment received, 72 and 34 pts were respectively allocated into FP cohort and TB cohort. With a global median follow-up of 14, the crude OS was 19.4 (95% CI: 17.9-NA) mo in FP cohort vs. 11.6 (10.0-17.2) mo in TB cohort. The HR of FP was 0.384 (95% CI: 0.192-0.769, TB as reference). Multivariate Cox regression showed that the adjusted HR was 0.323 (95% CI: 0.149-0.704), which was adjusted with sex, age greater than 65 yr, ECOG-PS, resection of primary lesion, radiotherapy history, location of lesion (left or right), metastases (liver, lung, and bone), and current line (3 or later). With PS, we performed three statistical methods, namely inverse probability weighting, PS matching (the sample size was 49 vs. 29 after matching), and additional adjustment for PS with multivariate cox regression. The HRs of FP were 0.437 (95% CI: 0.200-0.953), 0.446 (95% CI: 0.201-0.990), and 0.339 (95% CI: 0.153-0.748), respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated that FP demonstrated lower HR in subgroup of male (0.296, 95% CI: 0.117- 0.753), right-sided lesion (0.177, 95% CI: 0.043- 0.736), liver metastasis (0.291, 95% CI: 0.112- 0.756), and current line greater than 3 (0.303, 95% CI: 0.113- 0.812). Additionally in the raw set, the ORR was 16.67% vs. 8.82% (ORFP=2.067, 95% CI: 0.602-9.559), and the DCR was 93.06% vs. 73.53% (ORFP=4.824, 95% CI: 1.518-17.030). Conclusions: FP demonstrated robustly lower HRs for OS in both crude and PS analysis. Likewise, FP showed better OS and DCR in pts with late-line mCRC than TB, which suggested FP might be a better therapy in late-line mCRC.
A phase 1b study of the OxPhos inhibitor ME-344 in combination with bevacizumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Authors: Boland Patrick M , Lenz Heinz-Josef , Cusnir Mike , Florou Vaia , Pishvaian Michael J. , Cohen Deirdre J. , Ciombor Kristen Keon , Winer Arthur , Guo Jessie Yanxiang , Algaze Sandra , Wiley Sandra E , Ghalie Richard , Hochster Howard S.
Published: January 2024

TPS222

Background: ME-344 is a synthetic small molecule that inhibits oxidative phosphorylation, resulting in energy starvation and cell death via caspase-dependent and -independent mechanisms. The activity of mitochondrial inhibitors is enhanced when mitochondrial respiration is upregulated, a situation achieved in solid tumors by inducing vascular normalization and hypoxia correction with antiangiogenics. In a CT26 colon carcinoma syngeneic murine model, ME-344 in combination with regorafenib showed significantly reduced tumor growth compared to regorafenib alone (Navarro et al. Cell Reports. 2016;15:2705). A randomized phase 0/1 window of opportunity study in HER2-negative breast cancer showed significant decrease in the proliferation marker Ki67 in patients administered ME-344 plus bevacizumab vs. bevacizumab alone (Quintela-Fandino et al, Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:35). The current study evaluates the safety and efficacy of ME-344 in combination with bevacizumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, a clinical setting where continued antiangiogenic inhibition has established benefit. Prior phase 1-1b studies of ME-344 as a single agent and in combination have established the RP2D at 10 mg/kg when administered intravenously weekly. Methods: This is an open-label phase 1b study in patients ≥18 years old with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard therapies, including fluoropyrimidine-, irinotecan-, and oxaliplatin-based regimens, anti-EGFR if RAS wild-type, PD/L-1-blocking antibody if MSI-H/dMMR, and BRAF-targeted therapy if BRAF V600E mutated. Other key eligibility criteria include measurable disease, ECOG performance status 0-1, adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function, no uncontrolled brain metastatic disease, no peripheral neuropathy grade ≥2, no uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes, and no increased hemorrhagic risk. Enrollment will proceed in 2 cohorts of 20 patients each. Cohort 1 will be administered ME-344 at 10 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15. Cohort 2 will be administered ME-344 at 10 mg/kg and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg both on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment will continue until disease progression or intolerance. Tumor assessment is performed every 8 weeks for 6 months and then every 3 months using RECIST-1 criteria. The primary endpoint is 16-week PFS. Secondary endpoints are PFS, response rate, and safety. Correlative analysis will evaluate treatment-related metabolic response. The study is actively enrolling, funded by MEI Pharma, and registered under NCT02100007. Clinical trial information: NCT02100007 .
Neoadjuvant anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) therapy in patients (pts) with resectable mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): EPOC2201.
Authors: Bando Hideaki , Tsukada Yuichiro , Taketomi Akinobu , Yuki Satoshi , Komatsu Yoshito , Akiyoshi Takashi , Shinozaki Eiji , Kanemitsu Yukihide , Takashima Atsuo , Shiozawa Manabu , Shiomi Akio , Yamazaki Kentaro , Matsuhashi Nobuhisa , Hasegawa Hiroko , Kato Takeshi , Oki Eiji , Wakabayashi Masashi , Fuse Nozomu , Ito Masaaki , Yoshino Takayuki
Published: January 2024

TPS226

Background: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by surgical resection is a standard treatment for LARC. As anti-PD-1 therapy for patients with dMMR colorectal cancer is responsive in the context of metastatic disease, several clinical trials which evaluate the efficacies of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with dMMR LARC are on-going and suggested the outstanding responses (Cercek A. et al., N Engl J Med 2022). Methods: We initiated the EPOC 2201 VOLTAGE-2 study, which is an ongoing, non-randomized, single-arm phase II trial. The major eligibility criteria were as follows: treatment-naïve with rectal cancer located 12 cm from the anal verge; confirmed dMMR; clinical stage II/III in primary cohort (N=35) and stage I in exploratory cohort (N=20); age ≥ 18; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1; and presence of sufficient organ function. The study treatments include 12 cycles of nivolumab (NIVO) monotherapy (240 mg every 2 weeks) followed by assessment using Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSKCC) Regression Schema (Smith J.J. et al., BMC Cancer 2015). If clinical complete response (cCR) or near complete response (nCR) are observed, non-operative management with additional 12 cycles of NIVO will be performed. If incomplete response (IR) is observed, standard chemoradiotherapy with 50.4Gy of radiation plus capecitabine followed by surgery will be performed. The primary endpoint is the 2-year cCR rate in primary cohort. Various survival endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are assessed as secondary endpoints. Safety analyses are performed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ver. 5.0, and the Clavien‒Dindo classification (ver. 2.0) is added for postoperative complications. Assuming null and alternative hypotheses, cCR rates of 23% and 45%, the planned sample size for primary cohort was set at 35, with a one-sided alpha of 5% and power of 80%. An exploratory biomarker study was also conducted using serially collected tumor and blood samples. Whole genome-based minimal residual disease (MRD) assay and whole exome/whole transcriptome-based tumor and immune microenvironment analyses are performed. As of August 2023, patient’s enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: jRCT2031220484 .
FOENIX-CCA4: A phase 2 study of futibatinib 20 mg and 16 mg in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions/rearrangements.
Authors: Macarulla Teresa , Mizuno Takashi , Brandi Giovanni , Li Jin , Chen Ming-Huang , Kang Jung Hun , Abdalla Kathia Cristina , Wysocki Piotr Jan , Couto Nuno , Anderson Bailey , Elsayed Hamdy , Mantry Parvez
Published: January 2024

TPS572

Background: In 2022, the U.S. FDA approved futibatinib, a covalently binding inhibitor of FGFR1–4, for previously treated patients with advanced intrahepatic CCA and FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. In the pivotal phase 2 FOENIX-CCA2 study, futibatinib 20 mg once daily (QD) resulted in an objective response rate (ORR) of 42% by independent review and a median duration of response (DOR) of 9.7 months. Futibatinib was tolerable and had a manageable safety profile.1 Limited phase 1 data suggest futibatinib may also have antitumor activity at a lower dose (16 mg QD), with fewer dose modifications required for adverse events.2 The aim of FOENIX-CCA4is to confirm the clinical benefit of futibatinib 20 mg QD and explore the safety and efficacy of futibatinib 16 mg QD in previously treated patients with advanced CCA and FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. Methods: In this global, phase 2, randomized, open-label study (NCT05727176), patients with CCA harboring FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements who have received ≥1 line of gemcitabine/platinum-based therapy for advanced/metastatic disease will be randomized 1:1 to futibatinib at a starting dose of 20 mg or 16 mg QD continuously on a 21-day cycle. Randomization will be stratified by the number of prior lines of systemic therapy for advanced disease (1 vs ≥2). Futibatinib will be continued until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor response will be assessed at baseline, every 6 weeks for the first 12 weeks, and every 9 weeks thereafter until radiographic progressive disease or initiation of new anticancer therapy. The primary endpoint is ORR according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, as assessed by blinded independent central review (analyzed when all patients responding to futibatinib have ≥6 months’ follow-up from the first onset of response). DOR is a key secondary endpoint. Other secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and quality of life. Sample size (120 patients) was estimated on the assumption that if the lower ORR between futibatinib 16 mg and 20 mg is 32% (with ≥60 patients per arm), the probability of correctly selecting the treatment arm with a true ORR of 42% is 0.87. Enrollment is ongoing in Europe, the US, and Asia-Pacific. 1. Goyal L et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:228–39. 2. Meric-Bernstam F et al. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:402–15. Clinical trial information: NCT05727176 .
Lenvatinib in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.
Authors: Akce Mehmet , Gbolahan Olumide B. , Switchenko Jeffrey M. , Sonbol Mohamad B. , Roccaro Giorgio , Cannon Robert M , Sheikh Saulat S , Alese Olatunji B. , Bekaii-Saab Tanios S. , El-Rayes Bassel F.
Published: January 2024

TPS578

Background: Liver transplantation is a curative treatment option in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) however; up to 20% of patients develop recurrent disease. HCC recurrence post-transplant is usually extrahepatic (up to 67%) hence requires effective systemic therapy options. Available data are limited and restricted to small non-randomized studies and case series. Lack of prospective clinical trial data and limited data indicates an area of unmet need in treatment of recurrent HCC after liver transplantation. This phase II study aims evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with recurrent HCC after liver transplantation. Methods: This is a multi-institutional phase II trial with lenvatinib in patients with recurrent HCC after transplantation. Lenvatinib is administered 12 mg daily orally in patients ≥60 kg, and 8 mg daily orally in patients <60 kg. Each cycle is 28 days. Restaging scans will be performed every 8 weeks. Eligible patients must have histologically proven HCC that has recurred after liver transplantation and not amenable for surgical resection, age ≥18 years, ECOG PS 0-1, Child Pugh Class A, measurable disease per RECIST version 1.1, adequate organ function, no prior systemic therapy with lenvatinib or another systemic therapy in the post-transplant setting. Prior liver directed therapy is allowed, should be at least >28 days prior to the study enrollment, and should have at least one measurable untreated lesion by RECIST 1.1 Primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints are safety/tolerability, progression free survival, and overall survival. Pre-treatment and on-treatment peripheral blood samples will be collected for correlative research. A Simon`s two stage Minimax design is employed (H0: ORR = 5%; H1: ORR = 24%; Type I error = 0.05; power = 80%). In the first stage, 11 patients will be accrued, and if there is no objective response among them, the study will be stopped for futility. Otherwise, additional 6 patients will be accrued for a total of 17 patients. This study is currently enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05103904 .
Anlotinib combined with penpulimab and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Authors: Chen Gong-Rang , Zhong Ting , Cai Jian-Hua , Liang Juan
Published: January 2024

TPS579

Background: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is recommended as a treatment option in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Anlotinib plus penpulimab, a humanized anti-PD-1 IgG1 antibody, has shown encouraging activity in the treatment of advanced HCC in an open-label phase II trial (NCT 04172571). Considering different anti-malignancy mechanisms, combining systemic and locoregional therapies may show a potential synergic effect and promising preliminary efficacy results in advanced HCC. Consequently, the aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib, Penpulimab, plus HAIC for advanced HCC. Methods: Trial design: This single-arm, prospective, phase II study will include treatment-naive adult (≥18 years) patients with advanced HCC, ECOG PS 0-2, and Child-Pugh class A-B. A total number of 26 patients will be enrolled for treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Patients will receive anlotinib(10 mg, p.o., qd, d1-14, q3w), penpulimab (200 mg, i.v., d1, q3w) and HAIC (d1- d2) with the FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin 85-130 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m2 for 48 hours) for 4-6 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with anlotinib and penpulimab for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR)), evaluated using RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints are median PFS and overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) per RECIST 1.1, quality of life (QOL) and safety. Recruitment for this study will complete in December 2024.
Phase I/II clinical trial of regorafenib plus durvalumab (MEDI4736) in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced biliary tract cancers.
Authors: Al-Rajabi Raed Moh'd Taiseer , Kasi Anup , Baranda Joaquina Celebre , Saeed Anwaar , Li Haoran , Bruey Collin , Best Shaun , Phadnis Milind A. , Sun Weijing
Published: January 2024

TPS581

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a heterogeneous group of cancers affecting the epithelial lining of the intra- and extrahepatic portions of the biliary tree, ranking as the second most prevalent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. A subgroup of BTC was found to have an abundant tumor specific neoantigen expression, enriched expression of immune related genes and genes regulating inhibitory immune checkpoint proteins. Recent advancements in BTC treatment include the TOPZ-1 trial, which established the survival advantage of adding durvalumab to the gemzar + cisplatin regimen with an estimated 24-month overall survival rate of 24.9% versus 10.4% for placebo. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival favored durvalumab at 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; P=0.001). Objective response rates also showed improvement, with 26.7% for durvalumab and 18.7% for placebo. Furthermore, single agent regorafenib has exhibited efficacy in patients with refractory advanced metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, particularly in terms of progression-free survival, favoring regorafenib over placebo, the overall toxicity profile was as expected. Regorafenib targets multiple tyrosine kinases and has been reported to show immunomodulatory properties that may counteract tumor-induced immunosuppression, providing a rationale for combining it with checkpoint inhibitors. We believe that modulating the tumor microenvironment with small molecule inhibitors like regorafenib will have synergistic effect when combined with checkpoint-based immunotherapy like durvalumab in patients with chemo refractory BTC. Methods: This study comprises a single-arm, unblinded Phase I/II trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination therapy involving regorafenib and durvalumab in patients with chemo-refractory advanced BTC. The Phase I portion employed a 3 + 3 design with two dose levels of regorafenib (80 mg and 120 mg) administered in conjunction with 1500 mg IV durvalumab every 28 days. Phase I successfully completed, and the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) endorsed the continuation of the trial as planned. Eligibility: Histologically confirmed unresectable or metastatic disease. Progressed on at least one line of therapy. May have received checkpoint inhibitor in the past. Inclusion criteria also include ECOG PS 0-1. Objectives:Primary Phase I: Safety of regorafenib in combination with durvalumab.Phase II: Progression-free survival (PFS).Secondary:Disease Control Rate (DCR), Overall response rate (ORR), Overall survival (OS). Statistical Plan: Interim futility testing after one year, halting if conditional power < 20%. Final analysis: PFS and OS via Weibull Regression. Enrollment is currently ongoing with 8 out of 40 patients enrolled.
Phase 1/2 trial of vesicular stomatitis virus expressing human interferon-β and NIS (VSV-IFNβ-NIS), with ipilimumab and nivolumab, in patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Authors: McGarrah Patrick Walsh , Naik Shruthi , Halfdanarson Thorvardur Ragnar , Peng Kah Whye , Russell Stephen J. , Molina Julian R. , Adjei Alex A.
Published: January 2024

TPS602

Background: Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is an aggressive malignancy comprising both pulmonary and extrapulmonary primary sites. NEC includes both small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), as well as other neuroendocrine carcinomas arising from any primary organ. A substantial portion (~40%) of NEC arises from gastrointestinal primary sites. The optimal systemic therapy beyond first line platinum and etoposide is not established. There is a critical need to improve upon the median survival in the second line, as most patients do not survive more than 6 months. The efficacy of dual immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) therapy in NEC shows some promise, but most tumors do not respond. One possible explanation for this is that the tumor microenvironment in NEC is non-inflamed. VSV-IFNβ-NIS is a vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-based oncolytic virus being tested in multiple early phase clinical trials. Preliminary studies of immune responses in patients receiving VSV-IFNβ-NIS therapy suggest some patients develop T cell responses to viral antigens and known tumor antigens. We hypothesize that VSV-IFNβ-NIS therapy may convert a non-inflamed or immune-excluded phenotype in NEC to a highly inflamed phenotype that sensitizes the tumor to ICIs. Methods: This is a phase 1-2 safety run-in study designed to determine the safety and efficacy of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in combination with dual ICI therapy, ipilimumab and nivolumab, followed by dose expansion in patients with refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or NEC. After a safety run-in, we will be testing the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in an expansion cohort of patients with SCLC or NEC of any primary site. Patients must have previously progressed on at least one line of systemic therapy. Prior treatment with checkpoint inhibitors is permitted. Patients are treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab on day 1, followed by one RP2D of 1.0x10^11 TCID50 VSV-IFNβ-NIS on day 4, followed by nivolumab every 3 weeks and ipilimumab every 6 weeks until progression, up to 2 years. The primary objective is to estimate the response rate by RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives include estimation of disease-control rate, duration or response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety signals. The NEC expansion cohort will seek to enroll 10 patients. If at least one objective response is observed, and safety is confirmed, the regimen will be considered for future study. Clinical trial information: NCT03647163 .
PANOVA-4 (EF-39): Pilot study of tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy with atezolizumab, gemcitabine (GEM), and nab-paclitaxel (NabP) as first-line (1L) treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).
Authors: Seufferlein Thomas , Cubillo Gracian Antonio , Kueng Marc
Published: January 2024

TPS718

Background: TTFields are electric fields that exert physical forces to disrupt cellular processes critical for cancer cell viability and tumor progression. TTFields therapy is noninvasive, locoregional, and is delivered via a portable electric field generator and skin-placed arrays. TTFields therapy has low risk of systemic toxicity and is approved for glioblastoma (and grade 4 glioma in Europe), and pleural mesothelioma. In vitro, TTFields (150 kHz) application decreased pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and clonogenicity; in vivo, TTFields concomitant with chemotherapy (chemo) had greater antitumor effect than chemo alone in orthotopic pancreatic tumors. Co-application of TTFields with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly decreased tumor volume, increased tumor infiltration and IFN-γ production, and did not impede ICI-induced effector memory T-cell production versus in vivo controls. The pilot (phase 2) PANOVA clinical study (NCT01971281) showed safety and feasibility with TTFields therapy plus NabP and GEM in metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). The randomized, pivotal (phase 3) PANOVA-3 clinical study (NCT03377491), evaluating TTFields therapy with GEM and NabP in LAPC, is ongoing. Methods: PANOVA-4 (pilot, single-arm clinical study) assesses the safety and efficacy of TTFields therapy (NovoTTF-200T device) concomitant with atezolizumab, GEM, and NabP as 1L treatment for mPDAC. Eligible patients (pts) are ≥18 years of age and have a new mPDAC diagnosis, measurable abdominal disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–1, and no prior systemic PDAC therapy. Atezolizumab (1680 mg, IV infusion) is given before chemo on day 1 of each 28-d cycle, with NabP (125 mg/m2 IV) and GEM (1000 mg/m2 IV) given on days 1, 8, and 15. TTFields therapy (150 kHz) is delivered for ≥18 h/d until disease progression per RECIST v1.1 or loss of clinical benefit. Clinical follow-up occurs every 4 weeks (q4w) with CT scans q8w. Survival is assessed every 3 mo post last on-site visit. The primary endpoint is disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year OS rate, objective response rate, PFS at 6 mo, duration of response, and safety. 76 pts are required to achieve 80% power (1-sided α level 0.05) to detect a 63% DCR vs historical 48% DCR in pts with mPDAC receiving 1L GEM and NabP. Clinical trial information: EUCTR2022-003157-55 .