Abstract B167: Genomics and cancer clinical trials navigator training: Results from a systematic review of the literature
Authors: Rivers Desiree , Willock Robina Josiah , Churchill Victoria 
Published: September 2024

Introduction: Trained cancer navigators have demonstrated success in improving outcomes for cancer patients. Trainings provided by the American Cancer Society and other organizations equip navigators with the knowledge, skills and experience to support patients and address barriers to cancer-related care and survivorship. Racial/ethnic minorities continue to be underrepresented in cancer clinical trials and are less likely to receive genomic counseling and testing. There is a notable gap in the availability of cancer navigator training in genomic and clinical trials. This study used a systematic review of the literature and consultations with Genomics and Cancer Clinical Trial (CCT) experts to inform the development of cancer navigation training curriculum. Methods: Two reviewers searched the PubMed database for peer-reviewed studies published through October 2022. Key MeSH terms included cancer, genetics, and training. An ancestor search of relevant articles was also conducted. Following title screening, eleven articles were selected for abstract and full-text review. Eight articles met all the inclusion criteria from which we extracted the 1) trainee population, 2) theoretical frameworks used, 3) program design and format, 4) curricular components, and 5) outcomes. New Data: Only seven articles on the topic of navigator training in genomics within the context of CCT were identified in the search. Training participants were diverse and were located within the United States and abroad. One training program was developed for bilingual (English/Spanish) navigators, one was tailored for cancer survivors who became navigators and two programs trained navigators for specific cancer types (e.g., colorectal cancer). Social cognitive theory (SCT) was used in two of the training programs. Other adult learning theories and intervention mapping for program development were also used in training development. The process for designing navigator trainings included: conducting discussion groups; interviews and surveys; engaging advisory boards; and adapting the National Human Genomics Research Institute modules and other resources. The curricula components included in-person and web-based; single semester or year-long sessions; formal coursework; lectures; role-playing; video viewing; tours of facilities; demonstrations; short writing assignments; action plans; case studies; story- telling; discussion and networking; assessment/evaluation; and refresher sessions. Modules addressed attitudes, barrier assessment and resolution, knowledge, self-efficacy, and communication. Conclusion: The peer-reviewed literature on navigator training describes some curricular elements that measure and address knowledge about genomics and CCT as well as the skills needed to increase self-efficacy to navigate for genetic studies and cancer clinical trials. However, the field of CCT lacks a consistent and widely used program aimed at training navigators in the integral role of genetics in precision medicine. These findings informed the design of our ACS-funded curriculum.

Citation Format: Desiree Rivers, Robina Josiah Willock, Victoria Churchill. Genomics and cancer clinical trials navigator training: Results from a systematic review of the literature [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B167.