Patients’ Perspectives on Plans Generated During Primary Care Visits and Self-Reported Adherence at 3 Months: Data From a Randomized Trial (Preprint)
Authors: Stults Cheryl D , Mazor Kathleen M , Cheung Michael , Ruo Bernice , Li Martina , Walker Amanda , Saphirak Cassandra , Vaida Florin , Singh Sonal , Fisher Kimberly A , Rosen Rebecca , Yood Robert , Garber Lawrence , Longhurst Christopher , Kallenberg Gene , Yu Edward , Chan Albert , Millen Marlene , Tai-Seale Ming 
Published: March 2024

BACKGROUND

Effective primary care necessitates follow-up actions by the patient beyond the visit. Prior research suggests room for improvement in patient adherence.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to understand patients’ views on their primary care visits, the plans generated therein, and their self-reported adherence after 3 months.

METHODS

As part of a large multisite cluster randomized pragmatic trial in 3 health care organizations, patients completed 2 surveys—the first within 7 days after the index primary care visit and another 3 months later. For this analysis of secondary outcomes, we combined the results across all study participants to understand patient adherence to care plans. We recorded patient characteristics and survey responses. Cross-tabulation and chi-square statistics were used to examine bivariate associations, adjusting for multiple comparisons when appropriate. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess how patients’ intention to follow, agreement, and understanding of their plans impacted their plan adherence, allowing for differences in individual characteristics. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to characterize the patient’s self-reported plans and reasons for adhering (or not) to the plan 3 months later.

RESULTS

Of 2555 patients, most selected the top box option (9=definitely agree) that they felt they had a clear plan (n=2011, 78%), agreed with the plan (n=2049, 80%), and intended to follow the plan (n=2108, 83%) discussed with their provider at the primary care visit. The most common elements of the plans reported included reference to exercise (n=359, 14.1%), testing (laboratory, imaging, etc; n=328, 12.8%), diet (n=296, 11.6%), and initiation or adjustment of medications; (n=284, 11.1%). Patients who strongly agreed that they had a clear plan, agreed with the plan, and intended to follow the plan were all more likely to report plan completion 3 months later (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) than those providing less positive ratings. Patients who reported plans related to following up with the primary care provider (<i>P</i>=.008) to initiate or adjust medications (<i>P</i>≤.001) and to have a specialist visit were more likely to report that they had completely followed the plan (<i>P</i>=.003). Adjusting for demographic variables, patients who indicated intent to follow their plan were more likely to follow-through 3 months later (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). Patients’ reasons for completely following the plan were mainly that the plan was clear (n=1114, 69.5%), consistent with what mattered (n=1060, 66.1%), and they were determined to carry through with the plan (n=887, 53.3%). The most common reasons for <i>not</i> following the plan were lack of time (n=217, 22.8%), having decided to try a different approach (n=105, 11%), and the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the plan (n=105, 11%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients’ initial assessment of their plan as clear, their agreement with the plan, and their initial willingness to follow the plan were all strongly related to their self-reported completion of the plan 3 months later. Patients whose plans involved lifestyle changes were less likely to report that they had “completely” followed their plan.

CLINICALTRIAL

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03385512; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03385512

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-10.2196/30431