An introduction to Spent Nuclear Fuel decay heat for Light Water Reactors: a review from the NEA WPNCS
Authors: Rochman Dimitri , Algora Alejandro , Àlvarez-Velarde Francisco , Bardelay Aurélie , Bremnes Øystein , Cabellos Oscar , Cano-Ott Daniel , Capponi Luigi , Carmouze Coralie , Caruso Stefano , Cummings Andrew , Dagan Ron , Fallot Muriel , Fiorito Luca , Giot Lydie , Govers Kevin , Häkkinen Silja , Hannstein Volker , Hoefer Axel , Huynh Tan Dat , Ichou Raphaëlle , Ilas Germina , Juutilainen Pauli , Koszuk Lukasz , Kromar Marjan , Lahaye Sébastien , Lam James , Laugier Frédéric , Launay Agnés , Léger Vincent , Lecarpentier David , Leppanen Jaakko , Malouch Fadhel , Martin Julie-Fiona , McGinnes David , Mills Robert William , Minato Futoshi , Nauchi Yasushi , Ortego Pedro , Petkov Plamen , Romojaro Pablo , Sato Shunsuke , Seidl Marcus , Shama Ahmed , Simeonov Teodosi , Sjöland Anders , Solans Virginie , Sommer Fabian , Tittelbach Sven , Tsilanizara Aimé , Vlassopoulos Efstathios , Vallet Vanessa , Vasiliev Alexander , Watanabe Tomoaki , Žerovnik Gašper 
Published: October 2024

This paper summarized the efforts performed to understand decay heat estimation from existing spent nuclear fuel (SNF), under the auspices of the Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety (WPNCS) of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. Needs for precise estimations are related to safety, cost, and optimization of SNF handling, storage, and repository. The physical origins of decay heat (a more correct denomination would be decay power) are then introduced, to identify its main contributors (fission products and actinides) and time-dependent evolution. Due to limited absolute prediction capabilities, experimental information is crucial; measurement facilities and methods are then presented, highlighting both their relevance and our need for maintaining the unique current full-scale facility and developing new ones. The third part of this report is dedicated to the computational aspect of the decay heat estimation: calculation methods, codes, and validation. Different approaches and implementations currently exist for these three aspects, directly impacting our capabilities to predict decay heat and to inform decision-makers. Finally, recommendations from the expert community are proposed, potentially guiding future experimental and computational developments. One of the most important outcomes of this work is the consensus among participants on the need to reduce biases and uncertainties for the estimated SNF decay heat. If it is agreed that uncertainties (being one standard deviation) are on average small (less than a few percent), they still substantially impact various applications when one needs to consider up to three standard deviations, thus covering more than 95% of cases. The second main finding is the need of new decay heat measurements and validation for cases corresponding to more modern fuel characteristics: higher initial enrichment, higher average burnup, as well as shorter and longer cooling time. Similar needs exist for fuel types without public experimental data, such as MOX, VVER, or CANDU fuels. A third outcome is related to SNF assemblies for which no direct validation can be performed, representing the vast majority of cases (due to the large number of SNF assemblies currently stored, or too short or too long cooling periods of interest). A few solutions are possible, depending on the application. For the final repository, systematic measurements of quantities related to decay heat can be performed, such as neutron or gamma emission. This would provide indications of the SNF decay heat at the time of encapsulation. For other applications (short- or long-term cooling), the community would benefit from applying consistent and accepted recommendations on calculation methods, for both decay heat and uncertainties. This would improve the understanding of the results and make comparisons easier.