The effect of circadian rhythm on clinical outcome in patients receiving pembrolizumab in the INSPIRE pan-cancer trial.
Authors: Janse van Rensburg Helena Jacoba , Liu Zhihui (Amy) , Abdul Razak Albiruni Ryan , Spreafico Anna , Bedard Philippe L. , Hansen Aaron Richard , Lheureux Stephanie , Butler Marcus O. , Siu Lillian L. 
Published: June 2022

2589

Background: The molecular networks comprising circadian rhythm are expressed in immune cells where they affect immune-related processes. Within the emerging field of chrono-immunotherapy, it has been proposed that immunotherapies should be applied at certain times of day to optimize efficacy. Two recent reports have suggested that earlier administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma may offer improved survival outcomes (Karaboué et al. ASCO 2021, PMID 34780711). Whether this observation applies to other tumour types, or occurs in geographic regions with differing seasonality, is not known. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the time of administration data from the INSPIRE single-centre, phase II, multi-cohort study of pembrolizumab (200 mg IV over 1 hour, q3w to maximum 35 cycles) in patients with advanced solid tumours (NCT02644369). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate PFS and OS. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to assess the association between time of administration and PFS or OS, adjusting for cohort. Fisher’s exact test was used to test for association with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Results: A total of 106 patients (19 head and neck squamous cell, 22 triple negative breast, 21 epithelial ovarian, 12 melanoma, 32 other solid tumours) were accrued between March 21, 2016, and May 9, 2018. Median time of follow-up was 11.5 months. Start of infusion times were obtained for 806 total doses. The median time of administration was 15h06 for the first dose and 15h11 for all doses (range 09h19 – 18h34). No differences in PFS or OS were observed between patients who received their first dose before or after noon, or before or after 15h06. Furthermore, no differences in PFS or OS were observed between patients who received ≥ 50% of their doses before or after noon, or before or after 15h11. There was also no difference in PFS or OS between patients who did or did not have a significant proportion of doses (≥ 20%) after 16h30 (“evening” in previous reports). There were no differences in the frequency of grade ≥ 2 irAEs amongst the various groups. No differences in efficacy were found when individual cohorts were evaluated separately. Finally, no differences in PFS or OS were observed when participants were grouped by season of first dose. Conclusions: Despite previous reports of improved survival with earlier ICI dosing, we did not identify any association of time of pembrolizumab administration with clinical outcomes. Our analysis is limited by small sample size and patient heterogeneity which may hinder identification of smaller associations. It is also unclear whether lower response rates in a pan-cancer population (relative to prior reports in lung cancer and melanoma) might impact correlation analysis. Further studies will be necessary to interrogate this phenomenon and ensure that ICI are optimally applied.