Quality of Life Assessment in Patients of Stage V Chronic Kidney Disease
Authors: Islam Dr. Md. Hedayetul , Sultana Dr. Nahid , Mansur Dr. Md Abul , Hossain Dr. Gulzar , Khoda Dr. Mehefuz-E- , Islam Dr. Rafi Nazrul , Kabir Dr. Hasan-Ul , Sumon Dr. Ahmed Sharif 
Published: November 2022

Introduction: Despite ongoing advances in the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD), the mortality rate, and level of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for the CKD population remain significantly higher than for the general population. The importance of measuring end-stage renal failure (ESRF) patients' quality of life in relation to healthcare lies in not only providing absolute survival but also the quality of that survival. Due to cost constraints, the profile of chronic kidney disease patients and their treatment in Bangladesh is almost identical to that of India, with patients frequently requesting a reduction in the frequency of dialysis sessions, the use of less expensive dialyzers, dialyzer reuse, and the absence of erythropoietin therapy. Hence, augmenting the QOL may perhaps be a challenge and an observable fact of specific interest for renal healthcare teams. This study is intended to assess KDQOL among patients receiving hemodialysis for 8 hours, and 12 hours per week, patients receiving CAPD, and patients of CKD stage V who decline any form of renal replacement therapy, and remained on conservative treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the quality of life among patients of CKD Stage V. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out at the Department of Nephrology, Dhaka Medical College Hospital and BIRDEM general hospital. The patients who received consultation at the Outdoor Department of selected hospital from November 2010 to October 2011. The study assess the of Quality of Life, and Cost Effectiveness on different modalities of treatment among the patients of chronic kidney disease stage V, and also to find out the best modality of dialysis. A total number of 134 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study, out of which 42 patients who were advised to commence renal replacement therapy, and after counseling opted to remain in conservative treatment were considered as GROUP I, 39 patients who received hemodialysis 8 hours per week were considered as GROUP II, 30 patients who received hemodialysis 12 hours per week in one or more centers were considered as GROUP III, and 23 patients who received Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis at least 3 exchanges per day were considered as GROUP IV. Result: Mean age was almost similar in all four groups, and most of the patients were 5th decade, and above. Male was predominant in all four groups, and the male-female ratio was almost 2:1 in the whole study patients. Diabetic nephropathy and glomerulonephritis were more common etiology of CKD in all four groups. Monthly expenditure was significantly (p<0.05) higher in group IV, followed by group III, group II, and group I in all three follow-ups, however, monthly expenditure was almost similar between group III, and group IV (p>0.05) but the mean monthly expenditure was higher in group IV patients. Mean serum Creatinine was lowest in group IV followed by group III, group II, and group I in descending order. Serum albumin was low in all the groups but almost parallel in all follow-ups in group II, groups I, and group IV, whereas the lowest was in group II followed by group I and group IV, but declined in group III during the 2nd, and 3rd follow-up from 1st follow-up. Hemoglobin level consistently remained within the target range in group IV in all follow-ups but below the target range in group I followed by group II, and group III in ascending order. The physical component score increased significantly in Group III, and Group IV at consecutive follow-ups, however, it was higher in Group IV. Similarly, the mental component score was recorded highest in Group IV, followed by group III, group II, and group I. Regarding mortality, it was observed that more than half of the patients were expired in group I, one-third in group II, and 16.7% in group III, and only 8.7% in group IV during final follow-up. Conclusion: Patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis achieved the best clinical parameters in terms of control of blood pressure, and volume overload. On the other hand, parameters were a lot away from the desired target in patients receiving hemodialysis for 8 hours per week, and they did not have significantly better parameters in comparison to those who were only on conservative treatment. The scenario of serum albumin, and serum creatinine, though complicated by the existence of malnutrition, were in best approximation to the desired level in these patients. According to the age-sex-matched risk categorization of the patients, it was found that the majority of patients on conservative treatment were in more than the average risk category.