bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025 huggingface dataset:
Tumor sidedness and intrinsic subtypes in patients with stage II/III colon cancer: Analysis of NSABP C-07 (NRG Oncology).
Authors: Kim S. Rim , Song Nan , Yothers Greg , Gavin Patrick , Allegra Carmen Joseph , Paik Soonmyung , Pogue-Geile Katherine L.
Published: September 2018

3514

Background: The predictive value of tumor sidedness in colorectal cancer is currently of interest especially in metastatic setting for anti-EGFR therapy response. We tested whether intrinsic molecular subtype classification predictive of treatment benefit in stage II/III colon cancer is an independent novel marker in association with tumor sidedness. Methods: All available cases included in the NSABP/NRG C-07 trial for which we had both gene expression data and anatomical data (n=1603) were used to determine the molecular subtypes using the following classifiers; the Colorectal Cancer Assigner (CRCA), the Colon Cancer Subtypes (CCS) and the Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS). Frequency of tumor sidedness in each subtype and recurrence-free survival were analyzed. Results: Intrinsic subtypes were differentially distributed in right- and left-colon tumors with the exception of the stem-like or CMS4 (mesenchymal) subtype (Table 1). Sidedness was not associated with prognosis (p=0.82, HR: 1.022 [CI: 0.851-1.227]) or prediction of patients with greater benefit from oxaliplatin when combined with 5-Fu+LV (interaction p=0.484). Conclusions: Although tumor sidedness is associated with distribution of intrinsic subtypes in stage II/III colon cancer, it is not predictive of survival benefit from oxaliplatin in C-07. Support: -180868, -180822, U24-CA196067; HI13C2162; PA DOH; Sanofi-Synthelabo Clinical trial information: NCT00004931. [Table: see text]
The potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).
Authors: Tie Jeanne , Cohen Joshua , Wang Yuxuan , Li Lu , Kinde Isaac , Elsaleh Hany , Wong Rachel , Kosmider Suzanne , Yip Desmond , Lee Margaret , Tran Ben , Burge Matthew E. , Goldstein David , Singh Madhu Sudan , Diaz Luis A. , Tomasetti Cristian , Papadopoulos Nickolas , Kinzler Kenneth W. , Vogelstein Bert , Gibbs Peter
Published: September 2018

3521

Background: The optimal approach to adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer is keenly debated. Routine practice and clinical guidelines vary widely. After pre-operative chemoradiation (CRT), a pathologic complete response (pCR) or nodal involvement (pN+) are prognostic markers that can guide clinical decision-making, but markers that better define the patients (pts) that are likely or unlikely to benefit from chemotherapy are urgently needed. We investigated the potential role of ctDNA as a biomarker to guide therapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multi-centre study in pts with LARC (T3/T4 and/or N+) planned for CRT and curative resection. Serial plasma samples were collected pre-CRT, post-CRT, and 4-10 weeks after surgery. Somatic mutations in individual pts’ tumor were identified via sequencing of 15 genes commonly mutated in colorectal cancers. We then designed personalized assays to quantify ctDNA in plasma samples. Pts received adjuvant therapy at clinician discretion. Results: 200 pts were enrolled between Apr-2012 and Dec-2015. Median age was 62 years (range 28-86), 67% were male and 159 pts had pre-CRT and post-op ctDNA samples available for analysis. Of these, 122 (77%) pts had detectable ctDNA prior to therapy. After surgery, 19 pts had detectable ctDNA and 11 of these 19 (58%) have recurred during a median follow up of 22 months. Recurrence occurred in only 12 of 140 (8.6%) with negative ctDNA (HR 12, p < 0.001). One hundred and two (64%) pts received adjuvant chemotherapy. Post-op ctDNA detection was predictive of recurrence irrespective of adjuvant chemotherapy (chemo: HR 10, p < 0.001; no chemo: HR 16, p < 0.001). Thirty-four pts (21%) achieved a pCR, 43 (27%) had pN+ disease. pCR (vs non-pCR) was associated with a trend for lower recurrence risk (HR 0.31, p = 0.089) and pN+ (vs pN0) with a higher recurrence risk (HR 4.2, p < 0.001). ctDNA detection remained predictive of recurrence among pts with a pCR (HR 14, p = 0.014) or with pN+ disease (HR 11, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Post-op ctDNA analysis stratifies pts with LARC into very high and low risk groups. ctDNA analysis remains strongly predictive of recurrence among pts with both lower risk (pCR) and higher risk (pN+) disease.
Combination of nivolumab (nivo) + ipilimumab (ipi) in the treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): CheckMate 142 study.
Authors: Andre Thierry , Lonardi Sara , Wong Ka Yeung Mark , Morse Michael , McDermott Raymond S. , Hill Andrew Graham , Hendlisz Alain , Lenz Heinz-Josef , Leach Joseph W. , Moss Rebecca Anne , Cao Z. Alexander , Ledeine Jean-Marie , Chan Emily , Kopetz Scott , Overman Michael J.
Published: September 2018

3531

Background: Nivo, a fully human anti-PD-1 mAb, provided an ORR of 31%, durable responses (median DOR not reached), and a 12-mo OS rate of 73.8% in pts with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC (Overman M, et al. 2017). Preliminary analysis of nivo + ipi, a humanized anti-CTLA-4 mAb, demonstrated manageable safety and promising efficacy in pts with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC (Overman M, et al . 2016). Here we report interim safety and efficacy of nivo + ipi in this pt population from the Checkmate 142 study (NCT02060188). Methods: Pts with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC who progressed on or were intolerant of ≥1 prior line of therapy received nivo 3 mg/kg + ipi 1 mg/kg q3w × 4 doses followed by nivo 3 mg/kg q2w until discontinuation due to disease progression or other reason. Primary endpoint was investigator-reported ORR by RECIST 1.1. Other endpoints included DOR, PFS, OS, safety, and tolerability. Results: 27 pts with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with nivo + ipi received the first dose ≥6 mo prior to the database lock (DBL; Sept 2016). Of these pts, 93% received ≥2 prior lines of therapy. At the time of DBL, 44% of pts remained on treatment, and 14 pts had discontinued therapy due to disease progression (n=8) or TRAEs (n=6). ORR was 41% and disease control rate (DCR) was 78% (Table). The median time to response was 2.7 mo, and 82% of responses (9/11) were ongoing at 6 mo. The medians for DOR, PFS and OS had not been reached. Grade 3–4 TRAEs occurred in 10 pts (37%).TRAEs leading to discontinuation included acute kidney injury, increased transaminases, necrotizing myositis, sarcoidosis, dyspnea, and thrombocytopenia (1 each). No deaths were attributed to therapy. Conclusions: Initial analysis ofnivo + ipi in pts with ≥6-mo follow-up demonstrated a manageable safety profile and clinical activity characterized by a high DCR and encouraging survival benefit. This study is ongoing, and updated efficacy and biomarker analyses of ≈80 pts with ≥6-mo follow-up will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188. [Table: see text]
Velour trial biomarkers update: Impact of RAS, BRAF, and sidedness on aflibercept activity.
Authors: Wirapati Pratyaksha , Pomella Valentina , Vandenbosch Ben , Kerr Peter , Maiello Evaristo , Jeffery Grahame Mark , Curca Razvan-Ovidiu D. , Karthaus Meinolf , Bridgewater John A. , Mihailov Anca C. , Kiss Igor , Merino Sandra , McKendrick Joseph James , Saridaki Zacharenia , Sagaert Xavier JA , Tejpar Sabine
Published: September 2018

3538

Background: Addition of (ziv)-aflibercept (A) to FOLFIRI in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has been shown to be beneficial in phase III VELOUR trial (NCT00561470). A follow-up study (NCT01754272) was undertaken to acquire tumor samples for biomarker analyses and identify subgroups of patients with differential treatment effects. The primary results assessing efficacy according to well-established CRC subgroups defined by RAS, BRAF status and sidedness are reported here. Methods: Tissue specimens were collected for 666 patients from 1226 ITT pts. Suitable specimens were assayed for somatic mutation using NGS targeting extended RAS and BRAF genes. NGS assays with no missing values were obtained for 482 pts. Affymetrix gene chip technology was used for whole-transcriptome profiling; sidedness was extracted from available pathological reports. Differences between subgroups were assessed by interaction analysis. Results: The treatment effects on overall survival (OS) for the 482 pts is still significant HR=0.80 (CI 0.65-0.99), and similar to the ITT (n=1226) results (HR=0.82, CI 0.71-0.93). Two established ways of defining mutations (traditional KRAS exon 2 and extended RAS using NGS) show a trend for a differential effect across mutation groups.(see table for OS). Interestingly, BRAF mutants (which are all RAS wild type) show a trend for better outcome Same is seen for PFS and RR. Sidedness did not affect efficacy (HR: 0.83 (0.63- 1.1) for left and HR: 0.83 (0.54-1.3) for right. Conclusions: None of the mutations subgroup results shows significant interaction, although the ratios of treatment HR favor RAS wild types. Similar trends were observed in published trials with bevacizumab or ramucirumab. Sanofi supported this ISS. Clinical trial information: NCT01754272. [Table: see text]
Regorafenib (REG) versus trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) as salvage-line in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies (REGOTAS): A propensity score analysis from a JSCCR multicenter observational study.
Authors: Fukuoka Shota , Moriwaki Toshikazu , Taniguchi Hiroya , Takashima Atsuo , Kumekawa Yosuke , Kajiwara Takeshi , Yamazaki Kentaro , Esaki Taito , Makiyama Akitaka , Denda Tadamichi , Hatachi Yukimasa , Suto Takeshi , Sugimoto Naotoshi , Katsumata Kenji , Ishikawa Toshiaki , Kashiwada Tomomi , Oki Eiji , Yuki Satoshi , Gosho Masahiko , Shimada Yasuhiro
Published: September 2018

3540

Background: It is unclear which drug of REG or TAS-102 should be used earlier for the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have access to both drugs. This study investigated the comparison of the efficacy between REG and TAS-102 in patients with refractory to standard chemotherapies. Methods: The clinical data of patients who were treated with REG or TAS-102 among these drugs naive mCRC patients between Jun 2014 and Sep 2015 were retrospectively delivered from 24 institutions of Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Propensity score (PS) was calculated with a logistic regression, in which using baseline parameters were included. Two methods, adjusted and matched analysis, to take propensity score were used. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models based on PS adjustment and matching. Results: Total of 589 patients were enrolled and 550 patients (223 patients in the REG group and 327 patients in the TAS-102 group) met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The results from PS adjusted analyses showed that OS was similar between the two groups (HR of TAS-102 to REG, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.18). There were also no statistically significant differences between two groups for progression-free survival (HR 0.94) and time to ECOG Performance status≥2 (HR 1.00), expect for time to treatment failure (HR 0.81; P = 0.025). In the subgroup analysis, REG showed favorable survival compared with TAS-102 in the age of < 65 years patients and unfavorable survival in ≥65 years patients (P for interaction = 0.012). In the PS matched sample (174 patients in each group), the clinical outcomes were similar to the results of the PS adjusted analysis. Conclusions: Although REG and TAS-102 showed a similar efficacy in mCRC patients with refractory to standard chemotherapies, the choice of the drug by age might affect the survival. Supported by JSCCR. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020416
Impact of FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab (bev) compared to FOLFOX and bev on health related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Analysis of the CHARTA-AIO 0209 trial.
Authors: Quidde Julia , Schmoll Hans-Joachim , Garlipp Benjamin , Junghanss Christian , Leithaeuser Malte , Vogel Arndt , Schaefers Michael , Kaiser Ulrich , Hoeffkes Heinz-Gert , Florschütz Axel , Rüssel Jörn , Kanzler Stephan , Edelmann Thomas , Forstbauer Helmut , Goehler Thomas , Hannig Carla , Hildebrandt Bert , Bokemeyer Carsten , Steighardt Jörg , Stein Alexander
Published: September 2018

3544

Background: FOLFOXIRI/bev is a highly efficacious first line regimen in MCRC. Despite higher rates of neutropenia, diarrhea and stomatitis, FOLFOXIRI/bev is tolerable and feasible in MCRC patients. To date nothing is known about the impact of this regimen on HRQOL. Methods: 250 patients were randomized to FOLFOX/bev (arm A) or FOLFOXIRI/bev (arm B). HRQOL were assessed at baseline, every 8 weeks during induction treatment (6 months) and every 12 weeks during maintenance treatment, using the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29 and QLQ-CIPN20. The mean values of every score were calculated as the average of week 8, 16 and 24 assessment. Test concerning mean values were performed as t-test, with global type I error set at 0.05. HRQOL deterioration and improvement rates were analyzed and compared between treatment groups using chi² tests. Results: For HRQOL analysis, 237 patients were eligible (arm A: 118; arm B: 119). Compliance rate with the HRQOL questionnaires was 95.4% at baseline, 72.6% at week 8, 59.5 % at week 16 and 43.5% at week 24. Whereas mean global quality of life score (GHS/QOL) was similar between arm A and B (59.8 vs. 58.8; p = 0.726), mean scores for nausea/vomiting (9.4 vs. 16.0; p = 0.015) and diarrhea (23.7 vs. 32.1; p = 0.051) significantly or borderline significantly favored arm A during induction period. Furthermore, at week 8 scores of nausea/vomiting (9.2 versus 17.3, p = 0.006) appetite loss (19.5 vs. 29.4; p = 0.035) and financial problems (18.3 vs. 29.5; p = 0.021) and at the end of treatment physical functioning (75.0 vs. 65.8; p = 0.048) were significantly better for arm A compared to arm B. No significant differences were observed in the remaining EORTC scores. The rates of deterioration and improvement between baseline and week 8 of at least 10 points in the EORTC scores were similar (e.g. deterioration-rate GHS/QOL score 21.5% vs. 26.5% for arm A vs. B; p = 0.461). Conclusions: Although no remarkable detriment in HRQOL was noted, the better efficacy of FOLFOXIRI/bev compared to FOLFOX/bev is associated with a decrease in mainly gastrointestinal QOL scores. Further subgroup-analyses will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT01321957.
A randomized phase II study evaluating efficacy and safety of SOX versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable rectal cancer (KSCC1301).
Authors: Katsumata Kenji , Oki Eiji , Kato Hiroyuki , Miwa Keisuke , Sugiyama Masahiko , Murakami Hidetsugu , Hasegawa Hiroshi , Mori Shinichiro , Nakayama Goro , Saeki Hiroshi , Shimokawa Mototsugu , Kakeji Yoshihiro , Baba Hideo , Akagi Yoshito , Maehara Yoshihiko
Published: September 2018

3549

Background: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is the current standard of care for rectal cancer. However, radiation therapy is sometimes associated with short-term severe toxicity and long-term morbidity. Perioperative introduction of new chemotherapy agents without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) may be a promising option. Several studies of combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) have reported promising efficacy and safety in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, suggesting a potential replacement for mFOLFOX6. Methods: A randomized phase II trial was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of SOX and mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LARC. Patients were randomly assigned to receive mFOLFOX6 (every 2 weeks; day 1: 400 mg/m2 bolus 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]; days 1 and 2: 2,400 mg/m2 continuous 5-FU; day1: 200mg/m2 l-LV; and day 1: 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin) or SOX (every 3 weeks; days 1–14: 80 mg/m2 oral S-1; and day 1: 130 mg/m2oxaliplatin). The protocol period for neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 3 months. The primary endpoint was the 3-year disease-free survival rate (3y DFS), and the secondary endpoints included pathological effect, R0 resection rate, survival and safety. Results: Between September 2013 and October 2015, 110 patients were enrolled and randomized (56 received SOX and 54 received mFOLFOX6). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two arms. The major adverse events were neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, loss of appetite, and fatigue. The incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia based on the CTCAE Vers.4.0was 13.2% in the SOX group and 32.0% in the mFOLFOX6 group. The surgical completion rate was 100% for the SOX group and 96% for the mFOLFOX6 group. The incidence of grade II or more surgical site infection based on Clavien-Dindo classification (CD) was 11.3% and 4.2% for the SOX and mFOLFOX6 groups, respectively. The CD grade III anastomosis-related complications developed in 7 cases in total. Conclusions: The KSCC1301 study suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation is active and safe. The results of pathological response will be provided. Clinical trial information: UMIN000011486.
Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer harbouring DNA mismatch repair deficiency.
Authors: Cohen Romain , Hain Elisabeth , Cervera Pascale , Buhard Olivier , Dumont Sylvie , Bardier Armelle , Bachet Jean-Baptiste , Gornet Jean Marc , Dumont Sarah , Kaci Rachid , Bertheau Philippe , Renaud Florence , Bibeau Frederic , Parc Yann , Duval Alex , Svrcek Magali , Andre Thierry
Published: September 2018

3563

Background: Prognosis of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring microsatellite instability (MSI) is poorly characterized. We aimed to assess the clinical relevance of distinguishing sporadic (SP) from Lynch syndrome (LS)-related mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). Methods: Pts with diagnostic of dMMR and/or MSI mCRC between 1998 and 2016 were retrospectively identified in 6 French hospitals. Tumor samples were systematically collected and screened for RAS/RAF mutations and MLH1 promotor methylation. dMMR and MSI statuses were confirmed using immunohistochemistry and Pentaplex© PCR assay. Sporadic cases were molecularly defined as those displaying MLH1 loss of expression with BRAFV600E mutation and/or MLH1 hypermethylation. Clinical data (demographic data, metastatic sites, therapeutic strategies) were recorded. Results: 129 pts, of which 48 SP and 81 LS, were included. Compared with LS, SP were associated with female (P < .001), older age at diagnostic (P < .001), proximal colon (P = 0.002), and less liver metastasis (25% vs 47%, P = .02). For initially localized CRC, median disease free survivals (DFS) were 9.1 months (m) for SP (n = 22) and 12.3 m for LS (n = 47) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.5, 95%CI 0.28-0.90, P = .02). Median overall survivals (OS) from stage IV diagnosis were 43.9 m in the overall population, 23 m for SP and not reached for LS (HR = 0.23, 95%CI 0.10-0.52, P < .001). BRAF mutation was harbored by 29 SP tumors (60%) and did not impact OS among SP pts (P = .52). Metastatic disease was less frequently resectable for SP than LS (21% vs 56%, P < .001). Median DFS for pts with resected metastatic disease (n = 55) were respectively 6.7 and 10.5 m (HR = 0.28, 95%CI 0.10-0.73, P = .01). At the data cut-off date, 16 pts (15 LS and 1 SP) were still in complete remission. Median progression free survivals with first-line chemotherapy for pts with unresectable metastasis (n = 61) were 3.9 m for SP and 5.0 m for LS (P = .71). Conclusions: This retrospective study suggests a worse prognosis of pts with SP MSI mCRC compared to these with LS-related mCRC.
Bevacizumab and its impact on survival for patients receiving subsequent anti-EGFR therapy: Updated results from the SA metastatic CRC registry.
Authors: Price Timothy Jay , Karapetis Christos Stelios , Padbury Robert , Burge Matthew E. , Roy Amitesh Chandra , Maddern Guy , Roder David , Piantadosi Cynthia , Townsend Amanda Rose
Published: September 2018

3569

Background: Debate exists as to whether first line bevacizumab effects subsequent sensitivity to anti-EGFR therapy. Authors hypothesize that initial anti-VEGF therapy may induce biological changes that then increase the risk of acquired resistance to subsequent EGFR inhibitors. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the characteristics and survival of patients who were treated with an anti-EGFR therapy 2nd line and beyond by two groups defined by the first line therapy; 1. chemotherapy (chemo) plus bevacizumab (bev) and 2. chemo alone. Survival for this analysis is from the time of commencing first line chemotherapy and secondly from anti-EGFR therapy. Pearson chi test analysis was performed to determine whether receiving first line bev was associated with worse overall survival (OS). Results: 348 mCRC patients who received chemo with or without bev and then an anti-EGFR therapy were studied. Patient characteristics are summarised in the table below. The significant differences between group 1. Vs. 2. were as follows; median age 63.8 years v 67.9 years (p = 0.005), lower use of single agent FU 6.4% v 19.2%, KRAS status not tested (reflecting the practice changes over time) 19.3% v 39.2%, KRAS MT 2% v 4%, and where BRAF MT status was known (11%); BRAF MT rate 23% v 0. Median OS for the 2 groups was 34.2 months, and 28.2 months respectively (p = 0.12) from first line therapy. Median OS for patients who underwent single agent anti-EGFR as subsequent therapy was also not significantly different, 31.1 months group 1 (n = 60) versus 27.7 months group 2 (n = 85), p = 0.52. Results based on commencement of anti-EGFR therapy are under way. Conclusions: Survival was not significantly different between the two groups, and the trend was towards higher OS with chemo plus bev suggesting that in our registry population, bev administration in first line therapy with chemo did not lead to a worse outcome overall for those patients subsequently receiving anti-EGFR therapy, either with chemotherapy or as a single agent. Updated results from commencement of anti-EGFR therapy will give further insights and will be presented at the meeting.
Upfront short course radiotherapy (SCRT) in metastatic rectal cancer (mRC): A way forward.
Authors: Jain Shanu , Engineer Reena , Ostwal Vikas S. , Ramaswamy Anant , Chopra Supriya , Desouza Ashwin , Lewis Shirley Christabel , Arya Suprita , Patil Prachi , Saklani Avanish
Published: September 2018

3570

Background: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of SCRT followed by chemotherapy (CT) in locally advanced metastatic rectal cancer (LAmRC). Methods: Between May 2012 and August 2015, 70 patients having LAmRC with or without circumferential resection margin (CRM) positive disease treated with SCRT (25Gy/5#) followed by 3-6 cycles of capecitabine/5-FU, oxaliplatin or irinotecan based CT were assessed. Results: Fifty one had single site metastases (23 liver, 16 lung, 10 retroperitoneal lymph nodes and 2 peritoneum), 9 had combined lung and liver metastases and 10 had combined nodal and organ metastases. Sixty five (93%) patients could complete planned SCRT and 3-6 cycles of chemotherapy (starting 7-10 days after RT completion) with dose reduction in 21 (32%) patients owing to CT induced toxicities. Local tumor down-staging was achieved in 43 (61.4%) patients and the rest had a stable primary disease. Radiologically, CRM was free in 25 (46.3%) patients out of 54 initially involved. Surgery of the primary was planned in 38 (58%). R0 resection in 26 (40%), R1 in 7 (pCRM positive). Five refused surgery in spite of being resectable. Rest of the 27 (41%) received palliative CT due to progression of distant disease. Metastatectomy along with primary surgery was done in 16 (25%) patients. Median follow up was 29 months. Overall survival (OS) of entire cohort at 2 years was 40%. Median progression free survival (PFS) and OS of patients with resected primary was 17 (10-24) and 37 (28-45) months, respectively, which is significantly better than those who were not resected (p = < 0.001). Of these 33 resected patients, 13 (39.4%) are disease free and 20 have progressed (16 distant, 2 loco-regional and 2 local and systemic). Conclusions: Upfront SCRT followed by systemic CT in an unresectable group of metastatic rectal cancer patients is safe and feasible and is having encouraging results in terms of downstaging and resectability of the primary. [Table: see text]
Comparison of 5-FU vs capecitabine in combination with mitomycin or cisplatin in the treatment of anal cancer.
Authors: Yu Irene , Cheung Winson Y.
Published: September 2018

3576

Background: The patterns of capecitabine use as an alternative form of fluoropyrimidine to infusional 5-FU in the non-operative management of anal cancer in the real world are poorly described. Our objectives were to determine the frequency of capecitabine use, compare the observed outcomes between oral and intravenous fluoropyrimidines, and examine for variations in treatment-related adverse events between the two agents. Methods: All anal cancer patients who received either capecitabine or infusional 5-FU as part of their chemoradiation treatment from 2004 to 2013 at any 1 of 6 cancer centers in British Columbia were included. Chi-square and Wilcoxon-Mann tests were used to assess for associations between treatment groups and clinical characteristics and outcomes. Results: A total of 486 patients were identified: median age was 59 (IQR 53-67) years, 175 (36%) were men, 418 (86%) had ECOG 0/1, and 30 (6%) were HIV positive. Median total radiation dose was 54 cGy (IQR 50-54) and 47 (10%) underwent a colostomy prior to chemoradiation. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups with respect to age, gender, ECOG, and HIV status (all p > 0.05). Prior to 2010, only 5-FU was utilized. From 2010 to 2013, 155 and 82 patients (65% vs 35%) received capecitabine vs 5-FU, respectively. Overall (68% vs 67%, p = 0.831) and disease-free survival rates (59% vs 59%, p = 0.926) at 3 years were similar in the capecitabine vs 5-FU groups. Rates of subsequent abdomino-perineal resection were also similar (10% vs 14%, p = 0.164). Patients who received 5-FU were more likely to report adverse effects (76% vs 57%, p < 0.01). The capecitabine group had a lower incidence of stomatitis (7% vs 43%, p < 0.01) whereas the 5-FU cohort reported less frequent hand-foot syndrome (1% vs 7%, p < 0.01). The rates of myelosuppression, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and rash were similar between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: This represents one of the largest population-based studies to demonstrate a preference for capecitabine in place of 5-FU in the management of anal cancer. Survival outcomes were similar between the two treatment groups, but capecitabine may be better tolerated in the real world.
Colorectal cancer: Impact of primary tumor location on genetic alterations.
Authors: Salem Mohamed E. , Lenz Heinz-Josef , Xiu Joanne , Hwang Jimmy J. , Philip Philip Agop , Shields Anthony Frank , Marshall John
Published: September 2018

3578

Background: Recent data show that patients with left sided colon tumors (LT) have better survival and respond differently to biologics compared to patients with right-sided tumors (RT), likely due to molecular differences. We sought to examine these differences. Methods: Primary colorectal tumors (n = 1730) with origins clearly defined as RT (cecum to hepatic flexure; n = 273), LT (splenic flexure to sigmoid colon; n = 585), or rectal (RC; n = 872) were examined by NextGen sequencing, protein expression and gene amplification. Tumor mutational load (TML) was calculated in 1001 of these tumors using only somatic nonsynonymous missense mutations. Chi-square was used for comparison. Results: When compared to LT, RT carried a significantly higher rate of BRAF (25% vs 7%; p < 0.0001), PTEN (5.4% vs 1.3%; p = 0.008), and ATM (4% vs 1%; p = 0.04) mutations. RT were likely to have more MSI-high tumors (22% vs 5%; p < 0.0001) and PD-1 overexpression (58% vs 44%; p = 0.01). There were no differences in the rate of KRAS (50% vs 42%; p = 0.07) or NRAS mutations (2.2% vs 3.4%; p = 0.4). When compared to RC, RT had a higher rate of BRAF (25% vs 3%; p = 7E-07), PIK3CA (22% vs 11%; p = 0.001), CTNNB1 (3% vs 0.3%; p = 0.02); ATM (3% vs 1%; p = 0.04), PTEN (5% vs 1%; p = 0.004), and BRCA1 mutations (4% vs 0%; p = 0.02), and a lower rate of TP53 (56% vs 71%; p = 0.001) and APC (53% vs 66%; p = 0.003) mutations. When compared to RC, LT showed higher rates of BRAF (6.7% vs 3.2%; p = 0.04) and CTNNB1 (2.1% vs 0.3%; p = 0.04) mutations, and a higher rate of MSI-high tumors (4.6% vs 0.7%; p = 0.04), whereas RC had a higher rate of KRAS mutation (50% vs 42%; p = 0.04). There were no differences between RT, LT, and RC for the frequency of PD-L1 (2%, 2%, and 1%) or Her-2 (1%, 2%, and 3%) overexpression, although Her-2 amplification was significantly different (1%, 3%, and 5%, RT vs RC; p = 0.03). Mean TML was 12, 11, and 8 mutations/megabase for RT, LT, and RC, respectively (RT vs RC; p = 0.01). There was a correlation between TML and PD-L1 (p = 0.04) and PD-1 (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Tumors arising in the right colon carry genetic alterations that are different from LT as well as RC. However, it appears that CRCs carry a continuum of molecular alterations from the right to the left side, rather than displaying sharp, clear-cut differences.
Association of high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) with a high immunoscore (IS) compared to PD-L1 expression and increased survival in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with oxaliplatin (Ox) and fluoropyrimidine (FP): A pooled analysis of the AIO KRK 0207 and RO91 trials.
Authors: Noepel-Duennebacke Stefanie , Juette Hendrik , Schulmann Karsten , Graeven Ullrich , Porschen Rainer , Stoehlmacher Jan , Hegewisch-Becker Susanna , Mosig Axel , Arnold Dirk , Reinacher-Schick Anke C. , Tannapfel Andrea
Published: September 2018

3595

Background: MSI-H is an established prognostic marker in early colon cancer. Moreover, MSI-H, tumor immune cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression are also discussed as potential predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy. However, little is known about the prognostic value of these biomarkers and their association among each other in mCRC. Methods: We analyzed samples from pts. with mCRC uniformly treated with a FP and Ox within two randomized AIO trials (KRK 0207 and RO91). MS status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of mismatch repair proteins and subsequent fragment length analysis in case of protein loss or incoherent results. PD-L1 expression was determined by IHC (1% expression threshold). Tumor lymphocytic infiltration (CD8 and CD45RO) was scored according to the immunoscore (IS) concept by Galon et al (J Transl Med 2016). Results: 41/550 cases (7.5%) displayed MSI-H. The mean IS of the total population was 0.57 (SD 0.97), the IS of MSI-H pts. was significantly higher (mean of 2.4; SD 1.4; p≤0.0001). 17 cases were PD-L1 positive (pos.) (3 %), only four of these were MSI-H. MSI-H status was significantly correlated with a higher IS, but not with PD-L1 expression (table 1). There was no difference in median overall survival (mOS) between MSI-H and MS stable (MSS) pts. (mOS MSI-H/MSS: 17.6/22.5 months (mos.), log rank: p=0.85), PD-L1 negative (neg.) and pos. pts. (mOS PD-L1 neg./pos.: 22.1/28.9 mos., log rank: p=0.49) and IS high or low pts. (mOS IS high/low: 21.1/22.1mo., log rank: p=0.25). Conclusions: In contrast to early stage colon cancer, none of these parameters was prognostic in mCRC patients. Panel-sequencing with a total of 35 genes including RAS, BRAF and POL-E on cases with PD-L1 expression, high IS or MSI-H status to further characterize these cases will be reported. Clinical trial information: AIO-R091, AIO-KRK-0207: EudraCT-Nr: 2008-007974-39. [Table: see text]
Circulating tumor DNA analysis before and after resection for colorectal cancer.
Authors: Symonds Erin L. , Pedersen Susanne Kartin , Murray David , Young Graeme P
Published: September 2018

3597

Background: Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has broad clinical utility including disease monitoring, prognostication and response to chemotherapy. ctDNA is commonly detected by targeting tumor-specific features including mutations, insertions, deletions or hypermethylation. The two genes, BCAT1 and IKZF1, are methylated with high frequency in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to analyze the impact of tumor resection on ctDNA levels by assaying pre- and postoperative blood samples for methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1. Methods: 91 people (age 32-86 years, 53% male) with invasive CRC, but without neoadjuvant therapy, had blood collected prior to surgery and within 12 months (1-12 months) after resection. Cancers were clinicopathologically staged. DNA extracted from plasma was assayed for methylated BCAT1/ IKZF1 and detection of either marker was deemed positive for ctDNA. Results: 47 (52%) of the 91 CRC patients were ctDNA positive before resection, including 5/30 (17%) stage I, 17/28 (61%) stage II, 23/31 (74%) stage III and 2/2 (100%) stage IV. After resection 75% (35/47) became ctDNA negative (median 2 months after resection), and all had apparent tumour clearance. Of the 35 postoperative ctDNA negative cases 22 had further surveillance CT scans within study timeframe. 86% (20/22) showed no recurrent CRC but 2 of these developed a new cancer (metachronous CRC, prostate). The remaining 2 tested ctDNA positive 14 and 25 months later and recurrence was confirmed. Of the 12 postoperative ctDNA positive cases, two were found to not have complete tumour clearance at surgery (residual disease). Follow-up CT scans were available for a further 8 patients which revealed that 4 later presented with cancer (3 recurrence, 1 thyroid) at a median 15 months after resection. The remaining 4 postoperative positive cases were negative at subsequent blood testing (median 8 months later). Conclusions: Methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 DNA in preoperative blood is dependent on tumor stage, but informs the completeness of resection given the high rate (74.5%) of ctDNA disappearance post-surgery. If cases persistently test ctDNA positive after surgery or become ctDNA positive later, residual or recurrent disease should be suspected, respectively.
Cetuximab (Cet) clearance and survival in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Authors: Jiang Di Maria , Sim Hao-Wen , Siu Lillian L. , Shapiro Jeremy David , Liu Geoffrey , Price Timothy Jay , Jonker Derek J. , Karapetis Christos Stelios , Strickland Andrew , Zhang Wenjiang , Jeffery Mark , Tu Dongsheng , Ng Siobhan , Sabesan Sabe S. , Shannon Jenny , Townsend Amanda Rose , Morgen Eric , Xu Wei , O'Callaghan Christopher J. , Chen Eric Xueyu
Published: September 2018

3600

Background: Cet, a monoclonal antibody against EGFR, is a standard therapy for RAS wild-type (WT) mCRC. Limited data suggest a correlation between Cet clearance and progression-free survival (PFS). We performed a population pharmacokinetic (pop-pK) analysis of Cet in pts with KRAS WT mCRC who participated in the randomized phase III NCIC CO.20 trial. Methods: Standard Cet doses ± brivanib (Briv) were administered. Intermittent blood samples were obtained, and analyzed by ELISA for Cet. Pop-pK analysis was conducted to estimate Cet clearance. Pts were divided into quartiles according to clearance parameters to evaluate exposure-outcome with overall survival (OS), PFS, response rate (RR), and toxicity. Results: Blood samples were available from 703 pts. Cet clearance was best described as a one-compartment model with a saturable elimination (defined by Vmax and Km). Mean values (± standard deviation) were 5.6 ± 1.4 L for V, 10.5 ± 2.8 mg/h for Vmax, and 403.1 ± 2.0 mg/L for Km. Vmax and Km were significantly associated with OS, but not PFS or RR. Median OS for pts in the highest quartile of Vmax was 7.8 versus (vs.) 11.6 ms for pts in the lowest Vmax quartile (HR 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.20, p< 0.001). In the highest Km quartile, median OS was 11.6 vs. 7.6 ms in the lowest Km quartile (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96, p= 0.001). Pts with the lowest clearance parameters (lowest Vmax and highest Km) had significantly longer OS (11.6 ms) compared to pts with the highest clearance (highest Vmax and lowest Km) (7.6 ms) (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.83, p< 0.001). Overall incidences of grade 3/4 toxicity were not associated with Cet clearance. However, pts with the lowest clearance parameters had more frequent grade 3 diarrhea (OR 0.23, p= 0.005). Conclusions: For KRAS WT mCRC, standard Cet dosing is not optimal for all pts. Pts with lower Cet clearance have significantly improved OS and increased likelihood of grade 3 diarrhea. Further studies are needed to identify individual patient factors associated with Cet clearance, and to optimize Cet dosing based on individual pk assessments.
Differences in systemic and surgical therapy between right (R) and left (L) sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Authors: Kennecke Hagen F. , Yin Yaling , Loree Jonathan M. , Leung Rachel , Gill Sharlene
Published: September 2018

3602

Background: Patients (pts) with L sided primary tumors and mCRC have a significantly longer overall survival (mOS) than R sided tumors. Reasons for this remain unclear. The objective of this study was to compare systemic and surgical therapy received by tumor side and correlate this with mOS. Methods: Sequential pts with mCRC referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency in 4 treatment eras were included. Pts with unresected primary tumors were excluded to ensure accurate ascertainment of tumor location. Receipt of systemic therapy includes Òall 3 drugsÓ (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluouracil), bevacizumab and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi). Cox-regression survival analysis for sidedness was performed controlling for age, sex, tumor grade, lymphovascular/perineural invasion, nodes removed and metastatectomy. Results: Among 3242 pts, a progressive improvement in mOS is documented in both L and R sided tumors since 1995. L and R tumors received Òall 3 drugsÓ, bevacizumab and EGFRi therapy with similar frequency which plateaued after the introduction of EGFRiÕs in 2009. Patients with L sided tumors were significantly more likely to have a hepatic or pulmonary resection. In Cox regression analysis, the mOS difference between L and R sided tumors was more pronounced in more recent eras. Conclusions: Patients with R sided tumors receive similar systemic therapy compared to L sided tumors, but are significantly less likely to undergo resection of distant disease. Resection of distant metastases may be an important consideration to understand the survival differences between R vs L mCRC. [Table: see text]
Genetic correlates of therapeutic toxicities of stage III colon carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant FOLFOX+/-cetuximab (NCCTG N0147, Alliance).
Authors: Newcomb Polly A. , Sun Wei , Hua Xinwei , Banbury Barbara L. , Phipps Amanda I. , Kocarnik Jonathan , Harrison Tabitha A. , Shi Qian , Sinicrope Frank A. , Thibodeau Stephen N. , Chan Emily , Gill Sharlene , Goldberg Richard M. , Kahlenberg Morton S. , Nair Suresh , Shields Anthony Frank , Jahagirdar Balkrishna N. , Peters Ulrike , Alberts Steven R. , Chan Andrew T.
Published: September 2018

3604

Background: Limited research has investigated the role of variation in the host genome as a determinant of colon carcinoma (CC) outcomes, including toxicity due to therapeutic agents. We examined the relationship between germline genetic factors and treatment-associated serious adverse events (SAEs) in a population of CC patients in which treatment was standardized and follow-up for outcomes was uniformly conducted. Methods: Using existing biospecimens from CC patients with resected stage III disease in a phase III randomized trial of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy with and without cetuximab (NCCTG N0147), genome-wide genotyping arrays were conducted for 2200 patients for a total of ~20 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Using logistic regression models we assessed SNP-specific associations with SAEs, utilizing a discovery-based approach to search the genome in an unbiased manner. Detailed information on SAEs was collected using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v3.0). Analyses evaluating associations with specific classes of common grade ≥3 SAEs were performed, including gastrointestinal toxicities, neutropenia, and paresthesias. A threshold of P < 5x10-8was used to denote genome-wide significance. Results: Among patients who received FOLFOX, several SNPs on chr 15 near the ANP32A gene and on chr 2 near the CD207 gene were statistically significantly associated with grade ≥3 neuropathy. The strongest SNP-specific associations in these regions were in the range of odds ratio (OR) = 1.3, P = 2.8×10−10 and OR = 1.5, P = 2.7×10−10, respectively. Conclusions: Findings from this genome-wide analysis demonstrate the potential importance of germline genetic variation in influencing CC patients’ experience of specific toxicities to FOLFOX regimens. These results highlight two genomic regions of potential interest for understanding the biological mechanism for such toxicities, although further evaluation and replication is needed. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180820, U10CA180863, U10CA180888, CCSRI 021039, R01CA176272, Eli Lilly & Co, Pfizer, Sanofi. Clinical trial information: NCT00079274 .
Second-line tivantinib (ARQ 197) vs placebo in patients (Pts) with MET-high hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Results of the METIV-HCC phase III trial.
Authors: Rimassa Lorenza , Assenat Eric , Peck-Radosavljevic Markus , Zagonel Vittorina , Pracht Marc , Rota Caremoli Elena , Mathurin Philippe , Harris William Proctor , Bolondi Luigi , Reig Maria , Damjanov Nevena , Daniele Bruno , Porta Camillo , Mazzaferro Vincenzo , Abbadessa Giovanni , Schwartz Brian E. , Lamar Maria , Goldberg Terri Robin , Santoro Armando , Bruix Jordi
Published: September 2018

4000

Background: Tivantinib (T), a selective, oral MET inhibitor, improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo (P) in a phase II study in MET-High HCC pts. Methods: This randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial (NCT01755767) enrolled pts with: advanced HCC; Child Pugh A; ECOG PS ≤1; adequate bone marrow, liver, kidney functions; no liver transplant; radiographic disease progression (PD) after or intolerance to sorafenib; tumor MET-High (MET ≥2+ in ≥50% of tumor cells) by centralized immunohistochemistry. Pts were randomly assigned 2:1 to oral T or P, stratified by vascular invasion (VI), extrahepatic spread (ES), AFP ( < / > 200ng/mL), treated until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Response (RECIST 1.1) was evaluated by CT / MRI every 8 weeks. Primary endpoint of OS and secondary endpoints including PFS and safety were assessed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Results: From Dec 2012 to Dec 2015, 1209 pts were consented in Australia, the Americas, Europe, New Zealand: 589 MET-High, 43 initially randomized at the dose of 240mg BID, then reduced due to high neutropenia rate, 340 randomized at 120mg BID: 226 to T, 114 to P (ITT population). Characteristics of pts were balanced between arms: 306 (90%) male; median age: 67; PS 0: 207 (61%); VI: 117 (34%); ES: 197 (58%); AFP ≤200: 195 (57%); radiographic PD on sorafenib: 275 (81%). Median OS (95% CI) was 8.4 months (m) (6.8-10.0) in T, 9.1 m (7.3-10.4) in P, HR = 0.97 (0.75-1.25), P = 0.81. Median PFS (95% CI) was 2.1 m (1.9-3.0) in T, 2.0 m (1.9-3.6) in P, HR = 0.96 (0.75-1.22), P = 0.72. No OS difference was seen in pts with VI (HR 1.19, 0.79-1.79), ES (HR 1.09, 0.78-1.52), AFP > 200ng/mL (HR 1.00, 0.71-1.41). Grade (G) > 3 AEs were 55.6% in T, 55.3% in P. In T, most common G > 3 AEs were ascites (7.1%), general deterioration (5.8%), anemia (4.9%); most common serious AE was general deterioration (4.9%). Deaths within 30 days of last dose were 22.1% on T vs 15.8% on P (most common causes: general deterioration 3.5%, hepatic failure 2.6%). Conclusion: Tivantinib at the 120mg BID dose did not improve OS or PFS over placebo in patients with advanced MET-High HCC who failed previous treatment with sorafenib. Clinical trial information: NCT01755767.
Adjuvant capecitabine for biliary tract cancer: The BILCAP randomized study.
Authors: Primrose John Neil , Fox Richard , Palmer Daniel H. , Prasad Raj , Mirza Darius , Anthoney David Alan , Corrie Philippa , Falk Stephen , Wasan Harpreet Singh , Ross Paul J. , Wall Lucy R. , Wadsley Jonathan , Evans T.R. Jeffry , Stocken Deborah , Praseedom Raaj , Cunningham David , Garden O James , Stubbs Clive , Valle Juan W. , Bridgewater John A.
Published: September 2018

4006

Background: Despite improvements in multidisciplinary management, BTC has a poor outcome. Approximately 20% of cases are suitable for surgical resection with a 5 year survival of < 10%. BILCAP aimed to determine whether capecitabine (Cape) improves overall survival (OS) compared to observation (Obs) following radical surgery. Methods: Patients with completely-resected cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or gallbladder cancer (including liver and pancreatic resection, as appropriate), with adequate biliary drainage, no ongoing infection, adequate renal, haematological and liver function, and ECOG PS ≤2, were randomized 1:1 to Cape (1250 mg/m2 D1-14 every 21 days, for 8 cycles) or Obs. Randomization was minimized on tumor site, resection status, ECOG PS and surgical center. The primary outcome was OS in the intention to treat (ITT) population. 410 patients were needed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 (2-sided α = 0.05 and 80% power). HR was estimated by Cox survival model with adjustment for the minimization factors. Primary analysis performed with at least 24 months (m) follow-up. Results: 447 participants were randomized to Cape (n = 223) or Obs (n = 224) from 44 UK sites between 2006-2014. Median age was 63y (IQR 55, 69) and 201 (45%), 232 (52%), and 14 (3%) patients were ECOG PS 0, 1 and 2 respectively. Primary site: 84 (19%) intrahepatic, 128 (28%) hilar, 156 (35%) extrahepatic CCA and 79 (18%) muscle-invasive gallbladder cancers. Resection margins: R0 in 279 (62%) and R1 in 168 (38%); 207 (46%) were node-negative. Follow up was at least 36m in > 80% of surviving patients. By ITT analysis (n = 447), median OS was 51m (95%CI 35, 59) for Cape and 36m (95%CI 30, 45) for Obs, HR 0.80 (95%CI 0.63, 1.04; p = 0.097). Sensitivity analyses with adjustment for nodal status, grade of disease and gender indicated HR 0.71 (95%CI 0.55, 0.92 p < 0.01). In the per-protocol analysis (Cape n = 210, Obs n = 220) median OS was 53m (95%CI 40, NR) for Cape and 36m (95%CI 30, 44) for Obs, HR 0.75 (95%CI 0.58, 0.97; p = 0.028). Median RFS (ITT) was 25m (95%CI 19, 37) for Cape and 18m (95%CI 13, 28) for Obs. Grade 3-4 toxicity was less than anticipated. Conclusions: Cape improves OS in BTC when used as adjuvant and should become standard of care. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN72785446.