Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4)
Authors: Kooijmans Linda M. J. , Cho Ara , Ma Jin , Kaushik Aleya , Haynes Katherine D. , Baker Ian , Luijkx Ingrid T. , Groenink Mathijs , Peters Wouter , Miller John B. , Berry Joseph A. , Ogée Jerome , Meredith Laura K. , Sun Wu , Kohonen Kukka-Maaria , Vesala Timo , Mammarella Ivan , Chen Huilin , Spielmann Felix M. , Wohlfahrt Georg , Berkelhammer Max , Whelan Mary E. , Maseyk Kadmiel , Seibt Ulli , Commane Roisin , Wehr Richard , Krol Maarten 
Published: December 2021

Abstract. The uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial plants is linked to
photosynthetic uptake of CO2 as these gases partly share the same
uptake pathway. Applying COS as a photosynthesis tracer in models requires an
accurate representation of biosphere COS fluxes, but these models have not
been extensively evaluated against field observations of COS fluxes. In this
paper, the COS flux as simulated by the Simple Biosphere Model, version 4
(SiB4), is updated with the latest mechanistic insights and evaluated with site
observations from different biomes: one evergreen needleleaf forest, two
deciduous broadleaf forests, three grasslands, and two crop fields spread over
Europe and North America. We improved SiB4 in several ways to improve its
representation of COS. To account for the effect of atmospheric COS mole
fractions on COS biosphere uptake, we replaced the fixed atmospheric COS mole
fraction boundary condition originally used in SiB4 with spatially and
temporally varying COS mole fraction fields. Seasonal amplitudes of COS mole
fractions are ∼50–200 ppt at the investigated sites with a
minimum mole fraction in the late growing season. Incorporating seasonal
variability into the model reduces COS uptake rates in the late growing
season, allowing better agreement with observations. We also replaced the
empirical soil COS uptake model in SiB4 with a mechanistic model that
represents both uptake and production of COS in soils, which improves the
match with observations over agricultural fields and fertilized grassland
soils. The improved version of SiB4 was capable of simulating the diurnal and
seasonal variation in COS fluxes in the boreal, temperate, and Mediterranean
region. Nonetheless, the daytime vegetation COS flux is underestimated on
average by 8±27 %, albeit with large variability across sites. On a
global scale, our model modifications decreased the modeled COS terrestrial
biosphere sink from 922 Gg S yr−1 in the original SiB4 to
753 Gg S yr−1 in the updated version. The largest decrease in
fluxes was driven by lower atmospheric COS mole fractions over regions with
high productivity, which highlights the importance of accounting for
variations in atmospheric COS mole fractions. The change to a different soil
model, on the other hand, had a relatively small effect on the global
biosphere COS sink. The secondary role of the modeled soil component in the
global COS budget supports the use of COS as a global photosynthesis tracer. A
more accurate representation of COS uptake in SiB4 should allow for improved
application of atmospheric COS as a tracer of local- to global-scale
terrestrial photosynthesis.