P–224 Multinucleated and non-multinucleated embryos in PGT-A cycles: Is there any difference?
Authors: Papadopoulou M I , Papatheodorou A , Vorniotaki A , Christoforidis N , Chatziparasidou A 
Published: August 2021

Study question

Is multinucleation during cleavage stage correlated with the ploidy status of embryos and how does it affect the clinical outcome?

Summary answer

The presence of multinucleated embryos does not affect clinical outcome, although the risk of aneuploidy is higher in multinucleated embryos.

What is known already

Multinucleated blastomeres (ΜΝ) of cleavage stage embryos has been reported widely in scientific literature. Multinucleation has been associated with diminished embryo developmental competency and clinical outcomes such as lower implantation. Although this is an intriguing subject of research, it is not clear yet whether multinucleation is related to aneuploidy. Morphological irregularities such as multinucleation in blastomeres became a constant finding only after the perpetually evolving technology of time-lapse culture of embryos which in combination with PGT-A analysis, creates new research paths which aim to develop a new tool for selection or deselection of embryos for transfer.

Study design, size, duration

This retrospective study, included 97 PGT-A cycles, performed at Embryolab fertility clinic from May 2017 to December 2020, all cultured in time-lapse incubator (EmbryoScope). Two study groups were formed; the MN Group consisted of PGT-A cycles with at least one multinucleated embryo (n = 56) and the Control Group in which all PGT-A cycles had no multinucleated embryos (n = 38). Euploidy rate, type of chromosomal abnormality, cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates were compared between the two groups.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Embryos were annotated for the existence of multinucleated blastomeres on Day 2 of their development. Biopsy was performed on Days 5/6 and embryos were genetically tested. One or two euploid embryos were transferred. Euploidy rate and clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared. Within the MN group, euploidy rate between multinucleated and non-multinucleated embryos was compared. For abnormal embryos, association of multinucleation with the type of abnormality was tested. SAS statistical analysis was performed.

Main results and the role of chance

Mean female age was 35.93 years in the MN group and 38.39 years in the control group. Blastocyst formation rate (expressed per fertilised oocytes) was similar between MN and Control group (74% vs 76%, p = 0.6303). In the MN group, 56 cases resulted in 44 embryo transfers while in the control group 38 cases resulted in 23 embryo transfers. Pregnancy rates (59.09% vs 65.21%, p = 0.6255) and clinical pregnancy rates (45.45% vs 39.13%, p = 0.4245) were not significantly different between MN and Control group. Initially, cumulative live birth rate was found to be significantly higher in the MN group compared to the Control group (62.96% vs 33.34%, p = 0.0417). However, when logistic and poisson regression was applied, it became obvious that this difference was not affected by multinucleation but from other factors such as female age. When comparing multinucleated and non-multinucleated embryos within the MN group, it was found that the mean number of euploid embryos was significantly higher in the non-multinucleated subgroup of embryos (p = 0.0021). No correlation was found between multinucleation and the type of chromosomal abnormality.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The sample size is the main limitation of the present study. More research with bigger sample size is needed in order to confirm the finding of the present study.

Wider implications of the findings: The present study suggests that multinucleated blastomeres during embryo development is not an indication for diminished blastocyst formation and does not affect the clinical outcomes. However, within a sibling embryo population, non-multinucleated embryos tend to be euploid and this finding can be used to advance embryo selection efficiency.

Trial registration number

Not applicable