9 Predictive Ability of the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills (PASS) in a Sample of Predominantly Low-Income, Community Dwelling, African American Older Adults
Authors: Runk Ashlyn , Butters Meryl A , Rosso Andrea , Dubowitz Tamara , Troxel Wendy , Rodakowski Juleen , Gary-Webb Tiffany L. , Haas Ann , Ghosh-Dastidar Bonnie , Weinstein Andrea M 
Published: December 2023

Objective:

Mild decline in independent functioning is a core diagnostic criterion for Mild Cognitive Impairment. Performance-based assessments have been considered the gold standard to identify subtle deficits in functioning. Existing assessments were largely designed using demographically homogenous samples (white, highly educated, middle class) and often assume tasks are performed similarly across populations. The current study aimed to validate the utility of the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills (PASS) in determining cognitive status in a sample of predominantly African American, low-income older adults.

Participants and Methods:

Cognition and functional capacity were measured in n=245 older participants (aged 50+ years) who were recruited from a larger community study located in Pittsburgh, PA. Cognitive status was defined by a mean split on the Modified Mini Mental Status Examination (3MS) score (84/100). Participants above the cutoff were classified as unlikely cognitive impairment (UCI) and those below classified as potential cognitive impairment (PCI). Functional capacity was assessed using the number of cues provided on three PASS subtasks: shopping, medication management, and critical information retrieval (higher score = worse functioning). Self-reported cognitive and functional decline was assessed via the Everyday Cognition (ECog) questionnaire (higher score = greater decline). Generalized linear models compared performance scores between groups adjusting for literacy (WRAT3), age, and education. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were run for select functional performance scores to assess their predictive ability in discriminating between PCI and UCI.

Results:

Compared to the UCI group (N = 179), the PCI group (N = 66) was older (68 vs. 65 years, p = 0.05), less educated (11 years vs. 12 years, p < 0.01), had lower WRAT3 z-scores (0.19 vs. -0.55, p < .01), and required more cues on the shopping (4.33 vs. 8.54, p < 0.01) and medication management PASS subtasks (2.74 vs. 6.56, p < .01). Both groups reported elevated levels of subjective cognitive complaints on the ECog (1.46 vs. 1.56, p = .09) and performed similarly on the critical information retrieval PASS subtask (0.25 vs 0.54, p = .06). When discerning between UCI and PCI groups, the PASS Shopping subtask had an optimal cut-off score of 4, sensitivity of 0.86, specificity of 0.47, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.37, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71. PASS Medication Management had an optimal cut-off score of 3, sensitivity of 0.77, specificity of 0.56, PPV of 0.39, and AUC of 0.74.

Conclusions:

Subjective functional decline and performance on the critical information retrieval subtask were not associated with cognitive groups. PASS shopping and medication management had moderately high AUCs, suggesting they can reliably distinguish between groups. However, both tasks also exhibited low PPVs, low levels of specificity, and high levels of sensitivity, making them strong “rule-out” tests but poor “rule-in” tests in this sample. Because accurate assessment of functioning is useful for MCI and critical to dementia diagnosis, it is imperative we understand how these tasks function across different populations. Future work should 1) validate measures of functional ability across different populations and 2) develop population-appropriate assessments for use in clinical and research settings.