Dengue fever transmission between construction site and its surrounding communities in China
Authors: Liu Xingchun , Zhang Meng , Cheng Qu , Zhang Yingtao , Ye Guoqiang , Huang Xiqing , Zhao Zeyu , Rui Jia , Hu Qingqing , Frutos Roger , Chen Tianmu , Song Tie , Kang Min 
Published: September 2020

Background: Due to more mosquito habitats and the lack of basic mosquito control facilities, construction sites are more likely to have secondary cases after case importation, which may increase the number of cases entering the community and the chance of community transmission. For example, the outbreak in Zhanjiang Prefecture, China, 2018, started at a construction site, then occurred in the surrounding communities. This study aims to investigate how to effectively reduce the dengue transmission risk related to construction sites and the neighboring communities.Methods: The study was based on an outbreak of dengue fever (DF) occurred in Zhanjiang Prefecture, Guangdong Province in 2018. We simulated the transmission of dengue virus between human and mosquitoes at the construction site and in the neighboring community separately, as well between them by assuming human movement between the construction site and the neighboring community. Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious/Asymptomatic-Recovered (SEIAR) model was used for the human, while SEI model was used for the mosquitoes. We obtained the transmissibility parameters by fitting the model to observed number of locally acquired cases before local interventions started and the coefficient of determination (R2) was used to quantify the significance of the fit. We then evaluated the effectiveness of different intervention scenarios targeting at reducing the transmissibility between different human and mosquito subpopulations at different locations (i.e. construction sites and community) quantified by the total attack rate (TAR) and duration of the outbreak (DO).Results: A total of 467 DF cases were reported in Zhanjiang Prefecture in 2018, among which 102 were located at a construction site and 131 were located in the surrounding community. The values of R2 were 0.829 (P < 0.001) and 0.878 (P < 0.001) for the construction site and the community, respectively. The modelling outcome indicated that without interventions, the number of cases on the construction site would reach to 156, yielding a total attack rate (TAR) of 31.25% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.18%- 35.31%). In the community, the number of the cases would be much more than the reported data and up to 10796, yielding a TAR of 21.59% (95%CI: 21.23%- 21.95%). When the transmission route from mosquitoes to people is cut off in the community, the number of cases in the community would decrease to a minimum of 33 compared with other situations we simulated, yielding a TAR of 0.068% (95%CI: 0.05%- 0.09%) and a duration of outbreak (DO) of 60 days. When the transmission route from infectious mosquitoes in the community and the construction site to susceptible people on the construction site is cut off at the same time, the number of cases in the construction site would drop to a minimum of 74, yielding a TAR of 14.88% (95%CI: 11.76%- 18.00%) and a DO of 66 days.Conclusions: Without intervention, DF could spread rapidly in the densely populated communities around the construction site. To control the outbreak effectively for both the construction site and the community, interventions need to be taken to reduce the transmission within the community and from the community to the construction site. Only controlling the transmission within the construction site could not reduce the number of cases on the construction site, and controlling the transmission route within the construction site or between the construction site and the community could not lead to a reduction in the number of cases in the community.