What we have learned and will learn from cell ultrastructure in embedment‐free section electron microscopy
Authors: Kondo Hisatake 
Published: February 2008

The limitations inherent in conventional electron microscopy (EM) using epoxy ultrathin sections for a clear recognition of biological entities having electron densities similar to or lower than that of epoxy resin have led to the development of embedment‐free sectioning for EM. Embedment‐free section EM is reliably performed using water‐soluble polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a transient embedding medium, with subsequent de‐embedment of PEG by immersion into water, followed by critical point‐drying (CPD) of the embedment‐free section. The present author has stressed that this approach clearly discloses structures whose contours and/or appearance are accordingly vague and/or fuzzy in conventional EM, but does not reveal any new structures. Based on embedment‐free electron microscopy (PEG‐EM), this article presents five major findings regarding strand‐ or microtrabecular lattices which have been clearly revealed to occur in the cytoplasmic matrix—an impossibility with conventional EM. These are (1) the appearance of lattices of different compactness in various cells and in intracellular domains of a given cell; (2) the faithful reproduction from an albumin solution in vitro of strand‐lattices with correspondingly increasing compactness following increasing concentrations; (3) the appearance of more compact lattices from gelated gelatin than from solated gelatin at a given concentration in vitro; (4) the appearance of either greater or less lattice‐compactness by hyper‐ or hypotonic pretreatments of cells; and (5) the appearance of certain intracellular proteins confined to the centripetal demilune‐domain of centrifuged ganglion cells which is occupied with strand‐lattices of a substantial compactness. From these findings, questions now arise as to the biological significance of the individual strand itself in the microtrabecular lattices in PEG‐EM. In addition, it may be that the appearance of strand‐lattices in a given biological domain represents the presence of soluble proteins; the lattice‐compactness indicates the concentration of soluble proteins in the domain, and the aqueous cytoplasm is equivalent to the aqueous solution. Further, the appearance of two contiguous lattice domains exhibiting differing degrees of compactness in a given cell indicates that cytoplasmic proteins are solated in a domain with less compact lattices, whereas they are gelated in the other domain. These proposed interpretations need to be confirmed by further studies. If confirmed, the control mechanisms of the localization and movement of intracellular organelles could then be understood on the basis not only of information about the cytoskeletons but also of cell ultrastructure‐related information on the concentration and sol–gel states of intracellular proteins. In addition, possible interpretations of the significance of strand‐lattices in PEG‐EM are also applicable to the nucleoplasm, especially extra‐heterochromatin (euchromatin) areas. Finally, several potential uses/advantages of PEG‐EM in the cell‐ultrastructure have also been demonstrated, especially in three‐dimensional reconstructions of nonmembranous structures including stereo‐viewing using a pair of EM images with appropriate tilting as well as electron microscopic tomography. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.