Reference Data and Methods for Validation of Very High Resolution Optical Data Within ESA / EDAP Project
Authors: Saunier Sébastien 
Published: March 2021

&lt;p&gt;In this paper, the authors propose to describe the methodologies developed for the validation of Very High-Resolution (VHR) optical missions within the Earthnet Data Assessment Pilot (EDAP) Framework.&amp;#160; The use of surface-based, drone, airborne, and/or space-based observations to build calibration reference is playing a fundamental role in the validation process. A rigorous validation process must compare mission data products with independent reference data suitable for the satellite measurements. As a consequence, one background activity within EDAP is the collection, the consolidation of reference data of various nature depending on the validation methodology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The validation methodologies are conventionally divided into three categories; i.e. validations of the measurement, the geometry and the image quality. The validation of the measurement requires an absolute calibration reference. This latter on is built up by using either in situ measurements collected with RadCalNet[1] stations or by using space based observations performed with &amp;#8220;gold&amp;#8221; mission (Sentinel-2, Landsat-8) over Pseudo Invariant Calibration Site (PICS). For the geometric validation, several test sites have been set up. A test site is equipped with data from different reference sources. The full usability of a test site is not systematic. It depends on the validation metrics and the specifications of the sensor, particularly the spatial resolution and image acquisition geometry. Some existing geometric sites are equipped with Ground Control Point (GCP) set surveyed by using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) devices in the field.&amp;#160; In some cases, the GCP set comes in support to the refinement of an image observed with drones in order to produce a raster reference, subsequently used to validate the internal geometry of images under assessment. Besides, a limiting factor in the usage of VHR optical ortho-rectified data is the accuracy of the Digital Surface Model (DSM) / Digital Terrain Model (DTM). In order to separate errors due to terrain elevation and error due to the sensor itself, some test sites are also equipped with very accurate Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The validation of image quality address all aspect related to the spatial resolution and is strongly linked to both the measurement and the geometry. The image quality assessments are performed with both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The quantitative approach relies on the analysis of artificial ground target images and lead to the estimate of Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) together with additional image quality parameters such as Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR). On the other hand, the qualitative approach assesses the interpretability of input images and leads to a rating scaling[2] which is strongly related to the sensor Ground Resolution Distance (GRD). This visual inspection task required a database including very detailed image of man-made objects. This database is considered within EDAP as a reference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1] https://www.radcalnet.org&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[2] https://fas.org/irp/imint/niirs.htm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;