Abstract P1-18-07: Can some ER+/HER2+ patients be safely spared from treatment with chemotherapy plus herceptin?
Authors: Turnbull Arran K , Webber Victoria , McStay Daniel , Arthur Laura M , Martinez-Perez Carlos , Meehan James , Gray Mark , Kay Charlene , Renshaw Lorna , Keys Jane , Clarke Robert , Sims Andrew H , Oikonomidou Olga , Dixon J Michael 
Published: March 2020

Background: The ER+/HER2+ subtype accounts for up to 10% of all breast cancers (BCs) and most are treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with Herceptin +/- radiotherapy then adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) to reduce the recurrence risk. Despite this it is clear that not all ER+/HER2+ patients gain benefit from the addition of chemotherapy and Herceptin. In particular, given the significant side effects associated with the chemotherapy, the risks may out way the benefit in some older patients and in those with co-morbidities. Currently there are no clinically validated tools to identify women with ER+/HER2+ BC whose risk of recurrence remains unchanged with the addition of chemotherapy plus Herceptin and who can be effectively managed with adjuvant ET alone. Using levels of IL6ST, a biomarker for ET response, ER+/HER2+ patients who gain benefit from ET can be differentiated from those for whom ET alone is not sufficient to reduce the risk of recurrence. The latter group were characterised by inactive ER signalling and active MAPK and PI3K signalling. The aim is to show that ER+/HER2+ patients predicted to respond less well to ET alone using IL6ST levels, gain additional benefit from chemotherapy plus Herceptin.

Patients:

• Cohort A - 32 post-menopausal women (PMW) with large ER+/HER2+ BC treated with neoadjuvant (3-6 months) then adjuvant letrozole. Neoadjuvant clinical response was assessed by changes in tumour volume. Tumour core biopsies were taken at 0, 14 days and 3 months. Gene expression analysis using Illumina HT12 whole-genome beadarrays was performed on a subset (n=17) where fresh tissue was available. Median follow-up was 7.5 years.

• Cohort B - 362 women with ER+/HER2+ BC treated with surgery +/- radiotherapy followed by adjuvant endocrine therapy between 2005 and 20010. 219 also received chemotherapy plus Herceptin. Median follow-up is 9.5 years.

Results: In cohort A, half (16/32) of the patients responded to ET with tumour volume reductions of &gt;70% with neoadjuvant treatment. Innate resistance was apparent in 3 patients with continued tumour growth on ET, whereas 13 patients acquired resistance after a period of response. Neoadjuvant clinical response was predicted with 92% accuracy using levels of IL6ST. Gene expression analysis in 17 patients showed increased MAPK and PI3K pathway activity in the 9 NR compared with the 8 R tumours. In the 16/32 patients who responded well to neoadjuvant ET the actuarial recurrence rate was 0% at 5 and 10 years. The rate of recurrence in the NR was 30% at both 5 and 10 years. Samples from cohort B are currently being profiled using IL6ST in tandem with custom gene expression assays for ER, MAPK and PI3K pathway activity.

Conclusions:

• IL6ST levels can differentiate ER+/HER2+ BCs who respond well to ET alone and those with a poor clinical response who have a higher risk of recurrence.

• NR to ET have increased expression of PI3K and MAPK pathways, consistent with active HER2 signalling.

• Analysis of cohort B is underway and will elucidate the benefit in terms of recurrence-free and overall breast cancer specific survival from the addition of chemotherapy plus Herceptin to the group predicted to respond less well to ET using IL6ST.

• There is potential role for IL6ST in selecting ER+/HER2+ patients that require and benefit from HER2-targeted therapies.

Citation Format: Arran K Turnbull, Victoria Webber, Daniel McStay, Laura M Arthur, Carlos Martinez-Perez, James Meehan, Mark Gray, Charlene Kay, Lorna Renshaw, Jane Keys, Robert Clarke, Andrew H Sims, Olga Oikonomidou, J Michael Dixon. Can some ER+/HER2+ patients be safely spared from treatment with chemotherapy plus herceptin? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-07.