LB9. The Effect of Initiating Integrase Inhibitor-based vs. Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-based Antiretroviral Therapy on Progression to Diabetes among North American Persons in HIV Care
Authors: Rebeiro Peter F , Rebeiro Peter F , Jenkins Cathy , Bian Aihua , Lake Jordan , Lake Jordan , Bourgi Kassem , Bourgi Kassem , Horberg Michael A , Horberg Michael A , Moore Richard , Moore Richard , Altoff Keri , Klein Marina , Eron Joseph J , Eron Joseph J , Gill M John , Kitahata Mari , Napravnik Sonia , Silverberg Michael , Mayor Angel M , Willig Amanda , Willig Amanda , Floris-Moore Michelle , Sterling Timothy , Koethe John R , Koethe John R 
Published: October 2019

Background

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been implicated in greater weight gain than other regimens among people with HIV, but there is little evidence about its role in serious clinical outcomes proximal to weight gain. We therefore examined the impact of initial ART regimen class/drug on incident diabetes mellitus (DM) in a large North American HIV cohort.

Methods

Treatment-naïve adults (≥18 years) initiating INSTI-, protease inhibitor (PI)-, or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based ART from January 2007 to December 2016 in the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD) were included. Individuals were followed until date of incident DM (HgA1c >6.5%, diabetes-specific medication, DM diagnosis along with diabetes-related medication, or random glucose measure ≥200 mg/dL), virologic failure, regimen core switch, cohort close (through December 2016), death date, or loss to follow-up (≥12 months with no contact before cohort close). Cox regression stratified by site and adjusting for age, sex, race, HIV transmission risk, year of ART initiation, and baseline weight, CD4+ cell count, and HIV-1 RNA yielded adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incident DM by ART class and INSTI drug.

Results

Among 21,516 eligible ART initiators, 10,553 (49%) started NNRTIs, 6,677 (31%) PIs, and 4,286 (20%) INSTIs, with median follow-up of 3.0, 2.4, and 1.6 years, respectively. Among INSTI initiators, 21% started dolutegravir (DTG), 28% raltegravir (RAL), and 51% elvitegravir (EVG). Overall, 669 (3%) developed DM. Patients differed by all characteristics except baseline body mass index and HIV-1 RNA. Those starting INSTIs vs. NNRTIs had increased risk of incident DM (HR = 1.22; CI: 0.95–1.57) similar in magnitude as for PI vs. NNRTI initiators (HR = 1.25; CI: 1.05–1.49) (figure). Among INSTIs, starting RAL- vs. NNRTI-based ART was associated with a 50% increased risk of DM (HR = 1.50, CI: 1.11–2.03).

Conclusion

Initiating ART with INSTI- or PI- vs. NNRTI-based regimens may confer increased risk of incident DM, though risk is heterogeneous among INSTIs. Further research is needed to determine whether this elevated risk can be attributed to weight gain.

Disclosures

Kassem Bourgi, MD, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support), Joseph J. Eron, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Grant/Research Support), Janssen (Grant/Research Support), Merck (Consultant), ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Grant/Research Support), M. John Gill, MB, ChB, MSc, Gilead (Board Member), Merck (Board Member), Viiv (Board Member), Michael Silverberg, PhD, MPH, Gilead (Grant/Research Support). Other Authors: No reported disclosures.