Withdrawal reveals lack of effect of prolonged antihypertensive treatment on intrinsic aortic wall stiffness in senescent spontaneously hypertensive rats
Authors: Marque V , Grima M , Kieffer P , Capdeville‐Atkinson C , Atkinson J , Lartaud‐Idjouadiene I 
Published: March 2003

1. Chronic antihypertensive treatment lowers cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The beneficial effect on the blood vessel wall may be due to the lowering of blood pressure (BP) and, hence, wall stress (WS), or to a treatment‐induced change in wall structure.

2. We have previously shown that, when evaluated at the same level of BP and WS, the stiffness of the aortic wall of old spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) is higher than that of young and adult SHR and that of age‐matched Wistar‐Kyoto (WKY) rats. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the intrinsic changes in wall composition and mechanics in old SHR can be modulated by long‐term treatment with an angiotensin I‐converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril; 40 mg/kg per day) combined with a diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide; 20 mg/kg per day) and that treatment withdrawal would reveal whether such changes are maintained when BP and WS return to pretreatment levels.

3. We evaluated aortic structure and mechanics in SHR following 1 week withdrawal of oral antihypertensive treatment from 3 to 15 months of age (n = 8). Results were compared with age‐matched SHR that were maintained on treatment (n = 12) or were not treated (n = 13) and with WKY rats (no treatment n = 11; maintained n = 11; withdrawn n = 10).

4. Isobaric aortic wall stiffness was estimated from the ratio of baseline aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) to BP and the slope relating aortic PWV to BP following sodium nitroprusside‐induced hypotension. Relative wall stiffening was estimated as the ratio of elastic modulus (EM) to WS. We argued that if treatment produced a change in wall elastin or collagen content, with a subsequent decrease in isobaric wall stiffness, then this would be maintained when BP increased following withdrawal of treatment.

5. In old SHR, treatment lowered isobaric wall stiffness (baseline PWV/BP 4.6 ± 0.3 cm/s per mmHg; slope relating PWV to BP 6.7 ± 0.4 × 10−3 cm/s per mmHg and EM/WS 4.1 ± 0.4 vs 6.1 ± 0.4 cm/s per mmHg, 9.7 ± 0.9 × 10−3 cm/s per mmHg and 8.9 ± 1.1, respectively, without treatment; all P < 0.05). After 1 weeks treatment withdrawal, the indices (5.7 ± 0.2 cm/s per mmHg, 9.1 ± 0.2 × 10−3 cm/s per mmHg and 7.2 ± 0.6) increased in parallel with the increase in WS to levels similar to those observed in untreated SHR. There were no significant differences among the WKY rat groups.

6. Treatment increased the elastin and collagen contents of the aortic wall in both SHR (196 ± 13 and 128 ± 5 vs 111 ± 9 and 86 ± 4 mg/g wet weight, respectively, in untreated; P < 0.05) and WKY rats (190 ± 19 and 135 ± 4 vs 115 ± 7 and 114 ± 5 mg/g wet weight, respectively, in untreated; P < 0.05). This increase remained following withdrawal (213 ± 26 and 118 ± 4 vs 161 ± 14 and 127 ± 4 mg/g wet weight in SHR and WKY rats, respectively).

7. In summary, 1 year of treatment with captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide increases wall elastin content and reduces WS and stiffness in old SHR. Following withdrawal, elastin content remains high, but wall stiffness parallels WS in a manner similar to that in untreated SHR.