Strata and time: probing the gaps in our understanding
Authors: Smith David G. , Bailey Robin J. , Burgess Peter M. , Fraser Alastair J. 
Published: January 2015

Sedimentary strata are the paramount source of geohistorical information. The ‘frozen accidents’ of individual deposits preserve evidence of past physical, chemical and biological processes at the Earth's surface, while the spatial relationships between strata (especially superposition) yield successions of events through time. There is, however, no one-to-one relationship between strata and time, and the interpretation of the stratigraphic record depends on an understanding of its limitations. Stratigraphic continuity and completeness are unattainable ideals, and it is the departures from those ideals – the often cryptic gaps in the record – that provide both its characteristic texture and the principal challenge to its analysis. The existence of gaps is clearly demonstrated by consideration of accumulation rates, but identifying and quantifying them in the field is far more difficult, as is assessing their impact on the degree to which the stratigraphic record represents the environments and processes of the past. These issues can be tackled in a variety of ways, from empirical considerations based on classical field observations, to new ways of analysing data, to the generation and analysis of very large numbers of synthetic datasets. The range of approaches to the fundamental questions of the relationship between strata and time continues to expand and to challenge long-established practices and conventions.

Superposed sedimentary strata are the most accessible routes into deep time, and acceptance of their historical significance was a major scientific breakthrough. Given that the study of strata has been undertaken in something like its modern form for over two centuries, stratigraphy as a scientific discipline might be expected to have stabilized, as perhaps is indicated by stratigraphy textbooks suggesting that the subject is widely regarded as boring. Yet if there is a problem with stratigraphy, it is the converse: its development is increasingly punctuated by paradigm shifts triggered by new theories (evolution; global tectonics; eustasy; orbital forcing of climate change) and technological breakthroughs (digital computing; continuous seismic profiling; isotopic methods in chronology and palaeoclimatology). With this accelerating progress, it has become increasingly clear that the stratigraphic record yields only snapshots of Earth's past surface processes – the ‘frozen accidents’ that give the record its character and its enduring fascination. ‘Time is missing from sedimentary sequences on all scales … This discontinuity gives recorded planetary (geological) time a different architecture to human time’ (
Paola, C. 2003
. Floods of record.
Nature
,
425
, 459).

Strata and Time: Probing the Gaps in our Understanding
was the title of the Geological Society's William Smith Meeting for 2012. Its aim was to explore the relationship between the preserved sedimentary rock record and the passage of geological time, identifying, evaluating and updating the models that lie behind current stratigraphic methods. This volume includes contributions by some of those who presented papers at the conference, together with two additional, related papers. The range of topics in these 15 papers is broad; from field-based studies to numerical modelling exercises, from theoretical considerations of the nature of the record to a study of hydrocarbon reservoir distribution. Critical to all of these studies is the relationship between sedimentary rock strata and geological time.