Abstract GS2-02: Direct regulation of estrogen receptor-α (ER) transcriptional activity by NF1
Authors: Chang EC , Zheng Z , Philip L , Burcu C , Lei J , Singh P , Anurag M , Chan D , Li JD , Du XP , Shafaee MN , Banks K , Sacker S , Song W , Nguyen T , Cao J , Chen X , Haricharan S , Kavuri M , Kim B-J , Zhang B , Gutmann DH , Lanman RB , Foulds C , Ellis M 
Published: February 2018

Inactivating germline mutations in the NF1 gene (encoding neurofibromin) cause neurofibromatosis type 1. In addition to peripheral nervous system tumors, NF1 patients are at higher risk for other cancers, including breast cancer. Tumor exome-sequencing studies demonstrate that approximately 20% of all human cancers have somatic NF1 mutations. NF1 has been best known for its ability to inactivate Ras as a GAP (GTPase Activating Protein). However, this function is served by a small GAP domain in a very large protein. Recurrent missense mutations inactivating the GAP activity are infrequent. In contrast, it is common to detect frameshift (FS) and nonsense (NS) NF1 mutations, which can create an NF1-null state deleting not only GAP, but also, potentially, undefined NF1 functions whose loss could also drive tumorigenesis.

As we reported at SABCS previously, in 600+ patients treated by tamoxifen adjuvant monotherapy, we found that FS/NS NF1 mutations independently correlate with relapse risk (HR=2.6, p=0.03). To explore this finding, we silenced NF1 in preclinical models of ER+ breast cancer, which markedly enhanced ER transcriptional activities, causing estradiol (E2) hypersensitivity and converted tamoxifen into an agonist (in vitro and in vivo). Most important, these activities depend on ER, but not on NF1's GAP activity. These findings readily explain the poor patient outcomes associated with NS/FS NF1 mutations, and reveal a previously unrecognized function for NF1 in ER regulation.

In the presence of an agonist, liganded ER repels co-repressors and recruits co-activators, while the reverse is true with an antagonist such as tamoxifen. Many co-regulators contain leucine/isoleucine rich motifs, which bind directly to the ligand-binding domain (LBD) in ER. NF1 has several of these motifs that are much more highly conserved in species with a functional ER pathway, and some of these are mutated in cancers (e.g., in our patient cohort). Furthermore, we found that NF1 canbind directly to ER, and that this binding is mediated between the ER LBD and the NF1 leucine-rich regions. Like a classic co-repressor, wildtype NF1 (but not mutants lacking GAP activity or the Leu-rich motif) binds to ER, and is recruited by ER to the ERE in the presence of tamoxifen, but not E2.

Further preclinical treatment studies indicate that while NF1-deficient ER+ breast cancer should not be treated by tamoxifen or AIs, fulvestrant remains effective. Furthermore, when fulvestrant is combined with dabrafinib and trametinib to inhibit Ras effectors Raf and MEK, apoptosis is induced in vitro, and tumor regression is observed in vivo. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that NF1 is a dual negative regulator at the intersection of two potent oncogenic signaling pathways, Ras and ER, and that NF1-deficient ER+ breast cancer patients may be more effectively treated by co-targeting the Ras and ER signaling. These patients, up to 10% of those with advanced ER+ breast cancer, can be readily identified for treatment by ctDNA analysis. A clinical trial is under development.

Citation Format: Chang EC, Zheng Z, Philip L, Burcu C, Lei J, Singh P, Anurag M, Chan D, Li JD, Du XP, Shafaee MN, Banks K, Sacker S, Song W, Nguyen T, Cao J, Chen X, Haricharan S, Kavuri M, Kim B-J, Zhang B, Gutmann DH, Lanman RB, Foulds C, Ellis M. Direct regulation of estrogen receptor-α (ER) transcriptional activity by NF1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-02.