Diversity of bird communities and pressure from the recreational transformation v1
Authors: Shupova Tatiana 
Published: May 2024

Recreational activity leads to a complextransformation of the forest ecosystem. These disturbances taken togetheraffect the habitat conditions of birds. The transformation of bird communities under the pressureof negative impacts occurs in various ways. Due to the large number of speciesand wide ecological valence, many birds adapt to habitats in modified biotopes(Walther 2002;Blinkova et al. 2020). Some colonize new nesting sites(Shupova et al. 2022); others move nests to safer tiers of the forest stand(Blinkova & Shupova 2018) or to greater depths when nesting in a burrow(Chen et al. 2011). Birds easily navigate a new environment (Nicolaus et al.2019); develop new elements of behavior depending on living conditions, whichimprove the result of foraging (Jarjour et al. 2020), and the ability to engagein altruistic behavior increases offspring survival (Gómez-Serrano &López-López 2017). The analysis was to understand how the speciescomposition and diversity of birds changed along the sub-environment gradient:park, semi-natural (tourist bases) and natural (floodplain oak forest) habitatson the outskirts of the town. Observations were performed in June 2013 on thesite of the left bank of Siverskyi Donets River from Svyatogirsk town (49°01'55.3"N37°34'09.8"E) to Bogorodychne village (49°01'32.5"N37°31'02.1"E). To determine the anthropogenic impact gradient in thebiotope, we took into account the share of the transformed territory, the shareof the territory directly exposed to the uncontrolled impact of vacationers,the attendance of the site by people and domestic animals in the form of a sumof points. This was done according to the method described by us in the work ofShupova et al. (2023). The gradient of increasing anthropogenic impact formsthe following series of biotopes compared by us: biotope 1→ biotope 2 → biotope 3,and expressed in the number of points: 116→237→259. Elucidation of the species composition, abundance andbiotopic distribution of birds was performed by the method of counting birds onroutes (Bibbi et аl. 2000). We compare species diversity using data from samplesof different sizes obtained with transects (sampling units) of unequal length,due to which observed species abundances can be biased. To eliminate errors inthe interpretation of the analysis of diversity indices, there was a need formodeling to minimize the influence of disproportional sampling fractions. Our estimate of α-diversity is based on Shannonentropy, calculated by the method that links it to the species accumulationcurve proposed by А. Chao et al. (2013), and β-diversity indices, we calculatedabundance-based (Chao et al. 2006). The recreational transformation of riverbank tree biotopes negatively affects the species composition of communities and the magnitude of bird diversity along the sub-environment gradient: park, semi-natural (tourist bases) and natural (floodplain oak forest) habitats on the outskirts of the town. The α-diversity index data showed a clear picture of recreational transformation impact on birds. The Shannon entropy index shows an insignificant decrease in the species diversity of bird communities during the transition from biotopes 1 and 2, and more decrease in the bird community during the transition between biotopes 2 and 3. The Berger-Parker index, which reveals the degree of dominant species pressure, is the largest in the biotope 2. The Pielou evenness index revealed that the bird community inhabiting biotope 2 is also the most unbalanced. This result emerged after modeling the weighted indices, it is consistent with the result shown by ranged curves of species abundance, which we consider next, and we recommend our method for working with the Berger-Parker and Pielou index. According to the Sørensen and Jaccard indices, the greatest similarity of the species composition between the bird communities inhabiting the biotopes 2 and 3, the smallest – in the pair of bird communities of the biotopes 1 and 3.