Comparison of SHD-IBG and PVIBGT in ONFH including mechanical and pathological analysis of failure cases
Authors: Sun Jiahao , Ma Bowen , Chen Zhiyuan , Xia Tianwei , Shen Jirong 
Published: June 2024

Currently, there is a lack of relevant research on the efficacy difference between SHD combined with IBG and PVIBGT in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head(ONFH). Firstly, this study intends to compare the effectiveness of surgical hip dislocation combined with impacting bone grafts (SHD-IBG) and pedicled vascularised iliac bone graft transfer (PVIBGT) in treating ONFH. And the study investigates patients who suffered from hip preservation failures from both groups to better comprehend failure reasons. 30 patients (34 hips) with ARCO stage IIIA femoral head necrosis were selected between January 2012 and July 2022. They were divided into group A(SHD-IBG) and group B (PVIBGT) according to different surgical methods. Firstly, compared the 1-year effect between SHD-IBG and PVIBGT at 1 year postoperatively; Secondly, assessed the medium and long-term efficacy of SHD-IBG hip preservation treatment; Lastly, based on study of the femoral head removed from patients with hip preservation failure in the two groups, the reasons for the failure of hip preservation were comprehensively analyzed in the two groups. Group A: 11 males (13 hips), 4 females (4 hips);Group B: 9 males (11 hips), 6 females (6 hips).Firstly, the average Harris scores of the two groups at 1 year after surgery: preoperative: 70.7, 1 year after surgery: 78.9 in group A; preoperative: 69.5, 1 year after surgery: 81.5 in group B. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).Compared to the preoperative period, quantitative analysis by DCE-MRI showed an increase in perfusion in the necroticarea and an improvement in hyperperfusion in the repair-responsive area one year after the surgery. Secondly, in group A, the hip preservation rate was 88.2% at 2.5–11 (average of 77 months) years of follow-up, and the mean Harris score at the last follow-up was 73.2.Semi-quantitative analysis of postoperative DCE-MRI showed that the perfusion curves of necrotic and repaired areas were similar to those of the normal area. This suggests the instability within the femoral head had been effectively improved, and the perfusion had partially recovered. Thirdly, according to Micro-CT and pathologica studies of patients with hip preservation failure in these two groups, all these patients' femoral head was significantly collapsed and deformed. Their trabeculae was thin and partially disorganized, with fractures in the subchondral bone and separation of the cartilage from the subchondral bone. The necrotic areas had sparse trabeculae, disorganized arrangement, loss of continuity, and disappearance of cells in the trabecular traps. The necrotic area was covered with fibrous tissue, and partial restoration was observed in the repair area. Mechanical finite element analysis showed that the maximum equivalent force was observed in the weight- bearing area and the cortical bone surrounding the shaft of femurand. The result of DCE-MRI showed that the repair reaction area exhibited abnormal hyperperfusion. In this study, the efficacy of SHD-IBG and PVIBGT was compared at 1 year after operation, and the long-term follow-up of SHD-IBG was 2.5–11 (mean 77 months) years, combined with DCE-MRI results, we found that the short-term effect of PVIBGT was more significant than that of SHD-IBG. SHD-IBG can achieve satisfactory hip preservation in the medium and long term follow-up.