Health-Status Outcomes in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Physiology-Guided Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Strategy
Authors: Campo Gianluca , Guiducci Vincenzo , Escaned Javier , Moreno Raul , Casella Gianni , Cavazza Caterina , Cerrato Enrico , Contarini Marco , Arena Marco , Iniguez Romo Andres , Gutiérrez Ibañes Enrique , Scarsini Roberto , Vadalà Giuseppe , Andò Giuseppe , Pilato Gerlando , Musto d’Amore Sergio , Capecchi Alessandro , Trillo Nouche Ramiro , Moscarella Elisabetta , Gambino Alfonso , Pavani Marco , Zanetti Anna , Pesenti Nicola , Dudek Dariusz , Barbato Emanuele , Tebaldi Matteo , Biscaglia Simone 
Published: June 2024

BACKGROUND:

The FIRE trial (Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Disease) enrolled 1445 older (aged ≥75 years) patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease in Italy, Spain, and Poland. Patients were randomized to physiology-guided complete revascularization or treatment of the only culprit lesion. Physiology-guided complete revascularization significantly reduced ischemic adverse events at 1 year. This prespecified analysis investigated the changes between the 2 study groups in angina status, quality of life, physical performance, and frailty.

METHODS:

Patients underwent validated scales at hospital discharge (baseline) and 1 year later. Angina status was evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, health-related quality of life by EQ visual analog scale, physical performance by short physical performance battery, and frailty by the clinical frailty scale. Mixed models for repeated measures analysis were used to study the association between the treatment arms, time, and scales.

RESULTS:

Baseline and 1-year Seattle Angina Questionnaire, EQ visual analog scale, short physical performance battery, and clinical frailty scale were collected in around two-thirds of the entire FIRE study population. The mean age was 80.9±4.6 years (female sex, 35.9%). Overall, 35.3% were admitted for ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, whereas the others were admitted for non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Physiology-guided complete revascularization, compared with culprit-only revascularization, was associated with greater improvement in terms of angina status (Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score, 7.3 [95% CI, 6.1–8.6] points), health-related quality of life (EQ visual analog scale, 6.2 [95% CI, 4.4–8.1] points), and physical performance (short physical performance battery, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.9–1.3] points). After 1 year, patients randomized to culprit-only revascularization experienced a deterioration in frailty status (clinical frailty scale, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.1–0.3] points), which was not observed in patients randomized to physiology-guided complete revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present analysis suggested that a physiology-guided complete revascularization is associated with consistent benefits in terms of angina status, quality of life, physical performance, and the absence of further deterioration of the frailty status.

REGISTRATION:

URL:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov
; Unique identifier: NCT03772743.