Effect of Digital Medication Event Reminder and Monitor-Observed Therapy vs Standard Directly Observed Therapy on Health-Related Quality of Life and Catastrophic Costs in Patients With Tuberculosis
Authors: Manyazewal Tsegahun , Woldeamanuel Yimtubezinash , Fekadu Abebaw , Holland David P. , Marconi Vincent C. 
Published: September 2022

Importance

Little is known about whether digital adherence technologies are economical for patients with tuberculosis (TB) in resource-constrained settings.

Objective

To test the hypothesis that for patients with TB, a digital medication event reminder monitor (MERM)-observed therapy provides higher health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and lower catastrophic costs compared with standard directly observed therapy (DOT).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was a secondary analysis of a randomized, 2-arm, open-label trial conducted in 10 health care facilities in Ethiopia. Eligible participants were adults with new or previously treated, bacteriologically confirmed, drug-sensitive pulmonary TB who were eligible to start first-line anti-TB therapy. Participants were enrolled between June 2, 2020, and June 15, 2021, with the last participant completing follow-up on August 15, 2021.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a 15-day TB medication supply dispensed with a MERM device to self-administer and return every 15 days (intervention arm) or the standard in-person DOT (control arm). Both groups were observed throughout the standard 2-month intensive treatment phase.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Prespecified secondary end points of the original trial were HRQoL using the EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) tool and catastrophic costs, direct (out-of-pocket) and indirect (guardian and coping) costs from the individual patient perspective using the World Health Organization’s Tool to Estimate Patient Costs, and common factors associated with lower HRQoL and higher catastrophic costs.

Results

Among 337 patients screened for eligibility, 114 were randomly assigned, and 109 were included in the final complete-case intention-to-treat analysis (57 control and 52 intervention participants). The mean (SD) age was 33.1 (11.1) years; 72 participants (66.1%) were men, and 15 (13.9%) had HIV coinfection. EQ-5D-5L overall median (IQR) index value was 0.964 (0.907-1). The median (IQR) value was significantly higher in intervention (1 [0.974-1]) vs control (.908 [0.891-0.964]) (P &lt; .001). EQ-5D-5L minimum and maximum health state utility values in intervention were 0.906 and 1 vs 0.832 and 1 in control. Patients’ overall median (IQR) postdiagnosis cost was Ethiopian birr (ETB) 80 (ETB 16-ETB 480) (US $1.53). The median cost was significantly lower in intervention (ETB 24 [ETB 16-ETB 48]) vs control (ETB 432 [ETB 210-ETB 1980]) (P &lt; .001), with median possible cost savings of ETB 336 (ETB 156-ETB 1339) (US $6.44) vs the control arm. Overall, 42 participants (38.5%; 95% CI, 29.4%-48.3%) faced catastrophic costs, and this was significantly lower in the intervention group (11 participants [21.2%]; 95% CI, 11.1%-34.7%) vs control (31 participants [54.4%]; 95% CI, 40.7%-67.6%) (P &lt; .001). Trial arm was the single most important factor in low HRQoL (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.35-1.65;P &lt; .001), while trial arm (ARR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.58-4.13;P &lt; .001), occupation (ARR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.68-3.97;P &lt; .001), number of cohabitants (ARR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95;P = .03), and smoking (ARR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.01-7.28;P = .048) were the most important factors in catastrophic cost.

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients with TB, MERM-observed therapy was associated with higher HRQoL and lower catastrophic costs compared with standard DOT. Patient-centered digital health technologies could have the potential overcoming structural barriers to anti-TB therapy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04216420