P-799 Augmenting endometrial thickness and implantation rates: investigating the efficacy of autologous blood cell derivative - endosera in women struggling with thin endometrium and infertility
Authors: Nupur A , Srinivas C , Vasanthi P 
Published: July 2024

Study question

Could autologous platelet derived growth factor based strategies promote endometrial growth in women with refractory thin endometrium resulting in sustained implantation and live births?

Summary answer

Autologous platelet derived growth factor based strategies remarkably promote endometrial thickness and receptivity in women with refractory thin endometrium and pregnancy outcomes

What is known already

Repeated implantation failure (RIF) attributed to thin endometrium poses significant challenge in reproductive medicine. In cases where conventional treatments prove ineffective, couples often contemplate stressful option of surrogacy. Regenerative strategies, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), exhibit promise by capitalizing on anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative attributes of platelet-derived growth factors. Recognizing the imperative for anti-inflammatory microenvironment conducive to successful implantation, Endosera, a cell-free growth factors concentrate tailored for implantation has been formulated. This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of Endosera in augmenting endometrial thickness and implantation rates, offering potential remedies for RIF and thin endometrium.

Study design, size, duration

In this prospective self-controlled study 62 women (24-47 years) were enrolled spanning May 2021 to December 2023. Women experienced &gt;2 failed IVF cycles and multiple cycle cancellations due to refractory thin endometrium with poor endometrial receptivity defined as endometrial thickness of &lt; 7mm despite standard medical therapy, abnormal endometrial pattern and suboptimal endometrialvascularity, negative hysteroscopic screening for endometrial pathology, and negative bacteriologicscreening and despite multiple failed conventional therapies were selected to undergo Endosera treatment.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

After obtaining informed consent, patients underwent three intrauterine infusions of Endosera on menstrual cycle Day 7, Day 12, and 2 days before frozen embryo transfer (FET). Alongside standard hormone replacement therapy (HRT), 0.8 ml of Endosera was introduced into the uterine cavity. Pregnancy confirmation relied on a positive serum β-HCG test two weeks post-ET, while clinical pregnancy was established by detecting fetal heartbeat through transvaginal ultrasound four weeks post-ET.

Main results and the role of chance

In this study involving 62 patients facing multiple cancelled IVF cycles due to refractory thin endometrium, the administration of three doses of Endosera demonstrated significant positive outcomes. Average endometrial thickness notably increased from 6.2 ± 1.2 mm to 8.4 ± 1.2 mm (P &lt; 0.0001) after the 2nd Endosera dose, reaching an optimal thickness of ≥ 8mm. Among the participants, 43 achieved positive pregnancy result (69.4%), with 26 (41.9%) delivering healthy babies and 7 (11.3%) uneventful ongoing pregnancies. Poor outcomes included for 2 (3.2%) patients cycle was cancelled due to no endometrial improvement 5(8.1%) miscarriages before 10 weeks, while 12 (19.4%) women didn’t conceive and for 4.8%(3) patients results awaited post ET. No adverse effects were reported, indicating safety of Endosera.Cumulative positive pregnancy outcomes recorded to be 53.2% (33). The formulation, standardized to contain 6-9 times higher growth factor levels than peripheral blood, emphasizes implantation-friendly and anti-inflammatory cytokines. This optimized composition aligns with cyclical requirements of the endometrial phases (proliferation, secretion, and implantation), creating an angiogenic and anti-inflammatory environment crucial for successful implantation. Endosera’s safety, reproducibility, and efficacy in mimicking natural tissue repair and regeneration processes position it as promising solution for refractory thin endometrium-related challenges.

Limitations, reasons for caution

This study, though demonstrating improved outcomes in refractory thin endometrium cases with Endosera treatment, acknowledges limitations such as a small sample size and absence of a randomized control group. To establish Endosera as a routine adjuvant in IVF, larger study with stringent inclusion criteria for refractory thin endometrium is recommended.

Wider implications of the findings

Endosera demonstrated notable success with significant improvement in implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates for refractory thin endometrium patients prompts rigorous randomized controlled studies. These will include diverse populations, validating results and offering patients hope to reduce financial and psychological stress and challenges associated with cycle cancellations and surrogacy.

Trial registration number

Not Applicable