Abstract P4-01-05: Improving the quality of mammographic positioning
Authors: Chen CA , Strain A , Mickelsen JL , Larson DA , Jesinger RA , Botelho D , Fromholz S , Obi CN , Crawley A , Lipson JA , Ikeda DM , Cooper C , Pal S 
Published: May 2016

Purpose:

Optimal breast positioning is a key component to high quality screening mammograms to allow the radiologist to make the best interpretation for the patient and referring physician. In addition, the success of newer imaging techniques also depends on breast positioning. The American College of Radiology (ACR) sets the standard of what images should include by outlining 13 criteria of breast positioning. An initial audit of over 100 mammograms at our institution in 2013 found that only a mean of 33% were achieving the ACR criteria. The goal of our project was to increase the percentage of screening mammograms achieving ACR criteria to 90% by June 2015.

Methods:

Our breast imaging center partnered with a quality improvement (QI) team driving a radiology department-wide program on quality improvement. Team members identified 5 key causes that barred achieving the ACR criteria: disagreement on what meets criteria, not having a standard work for acquiring and reading mammograms, lack of communication between the technologist and radiologist, not having a measurement system to track performance, and lack of coaching on technologist techniques for acquiring images. Developments to address these causes included: teaching modules on what meets ACR criteria, standard work for radiologists to recall mammograms that did not meet ACR criteria, system for the technologist to document why criteria were missed, auditing system to track performance, and feedback sessions between technologists and radiologists. Over 1,700 mammograms were audited from the time period of July 2014 to March 2015.

Results:

By October 2014, the percentage of mammograms achieving all 13 of the ACR criteria was 71%, with 4 criteria that prevented reaching the 90% goal. By March 2015, 10 of the 13 ACR criteria were being sustainably met by the target goal of 90% of mammograms, better in all criteria compared to our 2013 data, and better in all but one criterion compared to published 1993 data. Table 1 demonstrates that we have been able to sustain a composite percentage of 12 of the 13 ACR criteria greater than 90% for the last 2 consecutive months.

Table 1 shows the composite percentage of mammograms achieving 12 of the 13 ACR criteria over time.2013 Baseline8/20149/201410/201411/20141/20152/20153/201564%67%77%82%83%81%95%96%The excluded, most difficult criterion (visualization of the opposite breast cleavage) has been achieved at 32% per 1993 published data; we currently achieve it at 40%. 12/2014 audits were not performed due to holidays and changes in staffing.

Conclusion:

Few institutions have published positioning data, with the most recent QI publication on breast positioning dating to 1993. We have conducted a structured process to improve quality of mammographic positioning, including revision of processes that led to poor positioning outcomes and creation of an environment to sustain our improved outcomes. Three ACR criteria continue to be problematic in reaching the 90% goal, with future investigation into whether it is actually feasible to achieve the most difficult criterion at our goal of 90%. Future work also includes assessing how the recent hire of a mammography coach to spread best practices and real-time feedback is able to further improve results and maintain the infrastructure of ongoing QI.

Citation Format: Chen CA, Strain A, Mickelsen JL, Larson DA, Jesinger RA, Botelho D, Fromholz S, Obi CN, Crawley A, Lipson JA, Ikeda DM, Cooper C, Pal S. Improving the quality of mammographic positioning. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-05.