On the predictability of turbulent fluxes from land: PLUMBER2 MIP experimental description and preliminary results
Authors: Abramowitz Gab , Ukkola Anna , Hobeichi Sanaa , Cranko Page Jon , Lipson Mathew , De Kauwe Martin G. , Green Samuel , Brenner Claire , Frame Jonathan , Nearing Grey , Clark Martyn , Best Martin , Anthoni Peter , Arduini Gabriele , Boussetta Souhail , Caldararu Silvia , Cho Kyeungwoo , Cuntz Matthias , Fairbairn David , Ferguson Craig R. , Kim Hyungjun , Kim Yeonjoo , Knauer Jürgen , Lawrence David , Luo Xiangzhong , Malyshev Sergey , Nitta Tomoko , Ogee Jerome , Oleson Keith , Ottlé Catherine , Peylin Phillipe , de Rosnay Patricia , Rumbold Heather , Su Bob , Vuichard Nicolas , Walker Anthony P. , Wang-Faivre Xiaoni , Wang Yunfei , Zeng Yijian 
Published: December 2024

Abstract. Accurate representation of the turbulent exchange of carbon, water, and heat between the land surface and the atmosphere is critical for modelling global energy, water, and carbon cycles in both future climate projections and weather forecasts. Evaluation of models' ability to do this is performed in a wide range of simulation environments, often without explicit consideration of the degree of observational constraint or uncertainty and typically without quantification of benchmark performance expectations. We describe a Model Intercomparison Project (MIP) that attempts to resolve these shortcomings, comparing the surface turbulent heat flux predictions of around 20 different land models provided with in situ meteorological forcing evaluated with measured surface fluxes using quality-controlled data from 170 eddy-covariance-based flux tower sites. Predictions from seven out-of-sample empirical models are used to quantify the information available to land models in their forcing data and so the potential for land model performance improvement. Sites with unusual behaviour, complicated processes, poor data quality, or uncommon flux magnitude are more difficult to predict for both mechanistic and empirical models, providing a means of fairer assessment of land model performance. When examining observational uncertainty, model performance does not appear to improve in low-turbulence periods or with energy-balance-corrected flux tower data, and indeed some results raise questions about whether the energy balance correction process itself is appropriate. In all cases the results are broadly consistent, with simple out-of-sample empirical models, including linear regression, comfortably outperforming mechanistic land models. In all but two cases, latent heat flux and net ecosystem exchange of CO2 are better predicted by land models than sensible heat flux, despite it seeming to have fewer physical controlling processes. Land models that are implemented in Earth system models also appear to perform notably better than stand-alone ecosystem (including demographic) models, at least in terms of the fluxes examined here. The approach we outline enables isolation of the locations and conditions under which model developers can know that a land model can improve, allowing information pathways and discrete parameterisations in models to be identified and targeted for future model development.