Chimerized Anti-ICOS 314.8 Monoclonal Antibodies Inhibit Tumor Cells and Regulatory T Cells in Patients with Sézary Syndrome
Authors: Amatore Florent , Barré Mathilde , Orlanducci Florence , Lopez Marc , Castellano Remy , Ram-Wolff Caroline , Gorvel Laurent , Goubard Armelle , Gaudy-Marqueste Caroline , Bagot Martine , Bensussan Armand , Delaporte Emmanuel , Olive Daniel 
Published: November 2021

Background: In a previous study, we reported the strong expression of Inducible T-cell costimulatory (ICOS) by Sézary cells, and presented the excellent preclinical efficacy results of anti-ICOS antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in both Sézary syndrome (SS) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Although exerting a potent direct action on the tumor cell, ADCs have the disadvantage of being associated with a cumulative toxicity, related to the conjugated drug. The development of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity/phagocytosis (ADCC/ADCP)-inducing anti-ICOS monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is therefore of great importance to ensure long-term maintenance therapy.

Methods: We first determined which anti-ICOS clone was the best candidate to induce an ADCC effect on ICOS + cell lines (MyLa, MJ and HUT78), using Mouse FcγRIII ADCC Bioassay (Promega®). The selected mAb was then chimerized and afucosylated (GlymaxX® technology, Evitria®).

Secondly, we evaluated in vitro ADCC and ADCP effect of the chimeric anti-ICOS mAb against ICOS + CTCL cell lines, compared to both positive controls (mogamulizumab (moga) and alemtuzumab) and negative controls (IgG1 isotype control, and rituximab). To perform ADCC experiments, we co-incubated target cells with mAbs and allogenic NK lymphocytes from healthy volunteers (HV). Cellular apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry using the Caspase 3/7 assay (Promega®). For ADCP, monocytes were sorted from HV blood samples and treated with M-CSF. Target cells were labeled with PKH67 (Sigma-Aldrich®) and after co-incubation, CD14 +CD11b +PKH67 + monocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry.

Finally, we verified the ADCC/ADCP potency of anti-ICOS mAbs on primary Sézary cells isolated from 16 moga-naïve SS patients, and 6 patients who had developed resistance to moga. We also questioned whether anti-ICOS mAbs were able to promote the autologous apoptosis of Sézary cells and T regulatory cells (Tregs) when directly incubated with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with SS.

Results: Among 7 different anti-ICOS clones, 314.8, 92.17 and 293.1 clones had the higher ADCC activity against MyLa, MJ and HUT78. Of these 3 clones, 314.8 had the best affinity to the receptor, and the best ability to inhibit binding between ICOS receptor and a recombinant ICOS ligand protein. Anti-ICOS 314.8 mAb was then chosen to be chimerized and glyco-engineered.

ICOS and CCR4 were strong and similarly expressed on MyLa and MJ. HUT78 had only mild expression of ICOS and CD52. Anti-ICOS mediated potent ADCC of cell lines (respectively 39.1±5% and 52.6±2.4% for MyLa and MJ cells), without significant difference when compared to mogamulizumab. In HUT78 cells, anti-ICOS induced a specific apoptosis of 35.7±5% versus 15.6±5.6% with alemtuzumab (p=0.02; CI95%: 4.1-36.1).

Moreover, phagocytosis induced by anti-ICOS was significantly increased than that induced by negative controls. On MyLa cells, anti-ICOS had a greater phagocytosis activity than moga (59.4±5.2% vs 39.4±5.1%, p=0.031).

Expression of ICOS by circulating tumor cells was found in all the 16 moga-naïve patients. The expression was strong, as 61±6% of tumor cells expressed ICOS vs 20±8% of non-tumoral CD4 + cells. CCR4 was more expressed than ICOS on both Sézary cells and non-tumoral CD4 + cells (91±6%, and 44±9% respectively). Anti-ICOS induced the apoptosis of 57.1±4.7% Sézary cells, compared to 16.9±2.2% with rituximab (p&lt;0.01; CI95%:-53--27). The efficacy was better than with alemtuzumab, but there was no significant difference with moga. The ADCP effect induced by anti-ICOS did not differ with moga. Interestingly, anti-ICOS were effective in 6 moga-resistant patient, as they induced 38.9±5.9% of apoptosis, compared to 12.4±4.7% with moga (p&lt;0.001).

Ex vivo, anti-ICOS allowed 39.4±19.9% and 70.1±20.1% lysis of Sézary cells and Tregs respectively, with no difference with moga and alemtuzumab. However, the depletion of non-tumoral CD4 + and total PBMCs was significantly lower with anti-ICOS mAbs than with moga and alemtuzumab.

Discussion: In a recent study, we showed that Treg cells of patients with SS have a high expression of ICOS. Here, we demonstrate that anti-ICOS mAbs induce Tregs depletion, which may improve immune profiles and emphasize Sézary cells killing. Our data suggest robust anti-tumor activity of anti-ICOS mAbs in SS, and xenograft experiments are underway to confirm these findings.

Disclosures

Lopez: Emergence Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Bagot: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Olive: Alderaan Biotechnology: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ImCheck Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergence Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.