ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT STATUS OF PNEUMONIA IN CHITTAGONG, BANGLADESH
Authors: Islam Md. Shahidul , Dey Liza 
Published: March 2022

Methods: The study was conducted on 500 pneumonia patients at the Chittagong Medical College Hospital and Chittagong port city between 23 October 2021 to 8 December, 2021. While the data collection on the hypertension in resource environments has been expanding through use of the standardized surveys, slight is known approximately the how fine treatments are existence applied. The knowledge of gap in the diagnosis, treatment form, and proper vaccination in addition to practicing good fitness is necessary if suitable illness administration is to be developed.
Results: Studied through roughly questions asked to suspicious the patients in addition to patient’s guardian. Randomized sampling techniques were used to categorize of different ages from the different wards in addition to areas of CMCH and Chittagong port city. It has been found that out of 500 study participants, 277 (55%) were male and 223 (45%) were female. It has been also found that out of 500 participants about (65, 13%) patients suffer from pneumonia due to intake of cigarettes, patients were (292, 44%) suffer from due to bacterial infections, patients were (123, 25%) suffers from pneumonia due to fungi infection, and patients were (90, 18%) suffer from this diseases due to infection of liquor.
Conclusion: This is the brief study conducted in Chittagong Medical College Hospital that assessed Pneumonia patients to recovery complications. It assumes that outcomes of this research work will exertion as the baseline for the future studies in same context.
                     
Peer Review History:
Received: 3 January 2022; Revised: 8 February; Accepted: 4 March, Available online: 15 March 2022
Academic Editor: Dr. Amany Mohamed Alboghdadly, Princess Nourah bint abdulrahman university, Riyadh, amalbgadley@pnu.edu.sa
UJPR follows the most transparent and toughest ‘Advanced OPEN peer review’ system. The identity of the authors and, reviewers will be known to each other. This transparent process will help to eradicate any possible malicious/purposeful interference by any person (publishing staff, reviewer, editor, author, etc) during peer review. As a result of this unique system, all reviewers will get their due recognition and respect, once their names are published in the papers. We expect that, by publishing peer review reports with published papers, will be helpful to many authors for drafting their article according to the specifications. Auhors will remove any error of their article and they will improve their article(s) according to the previous reports displayed with published article(s). The main purpose of it is ‘to improve the quality of a candidate manuscript’. Our reviewers check the ‘strength and weakness of a manuscript honestly’. There will increase in the perfection, and transparency. 
Received file:                Reviewer's Comments:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.0/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 7.0/10
Reviewers:
Dr. A.A. Mgbahurike, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria, amaka_mgbahurike@yahoo.com
Dr. Bilge Ahsen KARA, Ankara Gazi Mustafa Kemal Hospital, Turkey, ahsndkyc@gmail.com
Similar Articles:
CURRENT TREND OF RESISTANT FOR THE COMMONLY PRESCRIBED NEW FLUOROQUINOLONES AMONG HOSPITALISED PATIENTS IN SANA'A, YEMEN
STUDY OF RESISTANCE FOR RECENTLY MARKETED CARBAPENEM DRUG AMONG HOSPITALISED PATIENTS IN SANA'A, YEMEN