Abstract P1-06-01: Evaluation of subclonality in the CTC and DTC compartment of patients with metastatic breast cancer using low pass whole genome and AmpliSeq panel sequencing
Authors: Brouwer A , van Dam P-J , Rutten A , Prové A , Peeters M , Van Laere S , Dirix L 
Published: March 2017

Background

A growing understanding of the molecular biology of cancer and the identification of specific aberrations driving cancer evolution have led to the development of various targeted agents. Tumors can exhibit significant heterogeneity and this may change over time, also as the result of selective pressure. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), shed from multiple tumor sites, have demonstrated to represent of the overall tumor burden. We report the results of an ongoing comparative study on mutation and copy number profiles of primary and metastatic tissue, CTCs, and synchronously isolated DTCs from metastatic effusions of patients with clinically progressive MBC.

Materials & Methods

CTCs and DTCs were enriched from 7.5 ml blood or effusion using the CellSearch system and were further purified and sorted with the DEPArray system. For this study we isolated both 70 single and 70 pools of 10-200 CTCs or DTCs, in order have enough power to detect 5% subclones and analyse heterogeneity. Single and pooled WBCs were isolated as technical controls. DNA was isolated and amplified using the Ampli1-kit and subjected to Illumina WGS and Ion Torrent AmpliSeq panel sequencing. Fresh frozen tissue from solid metastases and the primary tumor, and bulk CTC (CellSearch Profile) were sequenced as comparators for mutation and copy number profiles. DNA of buffy coat was sequenced to enable germline variant detection. For mutational analysis, only somatic variants with good quality metrics, &gt;20x coverage, variant allele frequencies &gt;10%, and being non-synonymous or splice site variants, were taken into account.

Results

AmpliSeq panel sequencing was performed on 153 unique samples of three patients with a mean coverage depth of 1000x. In patient 1, a PIK3CA hotspot mutation was found clonally in all tumor samples at heterozygous level. Furthermore, various private mutations were found in both CTCs and DTCs, however not in WBC, including several TP53 hotspot mutations. In patient 2, another PIK3CA hotspot was present in all CTCs at heterozygous frequencies. In patient 3, an enormous heterogeneity was observed between all CTC and DTC samples. For patient 3, disease evolution was detected during multiple events of progressive disease over 2 years. At the moment, low pass WGS for CN detection for all samples is being performed and results will be present prior to the SABCS.

Conclusion

Based on the mutational status we conclude that both clonal mutations as well as various private variants are present in single and pools of CTCs and DTCs. In addition to the detection of targetable aberrations, the evaluation of heterogeneity is of clinical importance, as the effect of targeting subclones is currently being explored in clinical trials.

Citation Format: Brouwer A, van Dam P-J, Rutten A, Prové A, Peeters M, Van Laere S, Dirix L. Evaluation of subclonality in the CTC and DTC compartment of patients with metastatic breast cancer using low pass whole genome and AmpliSeq panel sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-01.