Surgical Strategy for Anterior Tibial Plateau Fractures in Hyperextension Knee Injuries
Authors: Liu Zhong‐yu , Zhang Jin‐li , Liu Chang , Cao Qing , Shen Qi‐jie , Zhao Jun‐chao 
Published: April 2021

Objective

The aim of the present study was to summarize the clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and clinical results for anterior tibial plateau fractures caused by hyperextension injuries.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 26 cases of anterior tibial plateau fractures that were treated with open reduction and internal fixation from January 2016 to December 2019, including 16 men and 10 women, aged 26–68 years old, with an average age of 47 ± 12.5 years. According to the three‐column theory classification, there were 16 cases of single‐column fractures (9 cases of anteromedial fractures and 7 cases of anterolateral fractures), 3 cases of two‐column fractures (anteromedial + anterolateral fractures), and 7 cases of three‐column fractures. Options for the surgical approach included anteromedial, anterolateral, modified anterior median, and anterolateral + posteromedial incision. The implants included a T‐shaped plate, an L‐shaped plate, a horizontal plate, and a TomoFix plate. The surgical approach and fixation method were selected based on the characteristics of the anterior tibial fracture. The Rasmussen radiological criteria were used to evaluate the effects of fracture reduction and fixation. The knee joint function was evaluated using the knee function evaluation criteria of the Hospital for Special Surgery. Medial and lateral stress tests, the Lachman test, and the pivot shift test were used to evaluate the stability of the knee joint. The range of knee motion was recorded.

Results

All cases were followed up for 12–24 months, with an average follow up of 15.7 months. The operation time was (148 ± 42) min; the intraoperative blood loss was (150 ± 50) mL. A total of 22 cases were anatomically reduced and 4 cases were well‐reduced, and the compression reduction rate was 100%. According to the Rasmussen radiology scoring, 17 cases were excellent and 9 cases were good. The excellent and good rate was 100%. The fracture healing time was 3.3 months. There is no difference in fracture healing time for different fracture types. Both the Lachman and pivot shift test findings were normal in 24 patients and nearly normal in 2 patients. The posterior drawer test was normal in 25 patients and close to normal in 1 patient. The varus stress test was normal in 24 patients and nearly normal in 2 patients, while the valgus stress test was normal in 23 patients, nearly normal in 2 patients, and abnormal in 1 patient. The range of motion (ROM) was 100°–137°, with an average of 125° ± 11.7°. The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score at the last follow up was 79–98 points, with an average of 87.54 ± 8.36 points; the results were excellent in 21 cases and good in 5 cases. Therefore, 100% of results were excellent or good. Two cases had superficial wound infections after the operation. The recovery of 2 patients with common peroneal nerve injury was poor.

Conclusion

The appropriate surgical approach and fixation method were performed according to the different positions of the anterior tibial fracture and satisfactory results were obtained after surgery.