Finding flies in the mushroom soup: Host specificity of fungus‐associated communities revisited with a novel molecular method
Authors: Koskinen Janne , Roslin Tomas , Nyman Tommi , Abrego Nerea , Michell Craig , Vesterinen Eero J. 
Published: July 2018

Fruiting bodies of fungi constitute an important resource for thousands of other taxa. The structure of these diverse assemblages has traditionally been studied with labour‐intensive methods involving cultivation and morphology‐based species identification, to which molecular information might offer convenient complements. To overcome challenges inDNAextraction andPCRassociated with the complex chemical properties of fruiting bodies, we developed a pipeline applicable for extracting amplifiable totalDNAfrom soft fungal samples of any size. Our protocol purifiesDNAin two sequential steps: (a) initial salt–isopropanol extraction of all nucleic acids in the sample is followed by (b) an extra clean‐up step using solid‐phase reversible immobilization (SPRI) magnetic beads. The protocol proved highly efficient, with practically all of our samples—regardless of biomass or other properties—being successfullyPCR‐amplified using metabarcoding primers and subsequently sequenced. As a proof of concept, we apply our methods to address a topical ecological question: is host specificity a major characteristic of fungus‐associated communities, that is, do different fungus species harbour different communities of associated organisms? Based on an analysis of 312 fungal fruiting bodies representing 10 species in five genera from three orders, we show that molecular methods are suitable for studying this rich natural microcosm. Comparing to previous knowledge based on rearing and morphology‐based identifications, we find a species‐rich assemblage characterized by a low degree of host specialization. Our method opens up new horizons for molecular analyses of fungus‐associated interaction webs and communities.

Fruiting bodies of fungi constitute an important resource for thousands of other taxa. The structure of these diverse assemblages has traditionally been studied with labour‐intensive methods involving cultivation and morphology‐based species identification, to which molecular information might offer convenient complements. To overcome challenges inDNAextraction andPCRassociated with the complex chemical properties of fruiting bodies, we developed a pipeline applicable for extracting amplifiable totalDNAfrom soft fungal samples of any size. Our protocol purifiesDNAin two sequential steps: (a) initial salt–isopropanol extraction of all nucleic acids in the sample is followed by (b) an extra clean‐up step using solid‐phase reversible immobilization (SPRI) magnetic beads. The protocol proved highly efficient, with practically all of our samples—regardless of biomass or other properties—being successfullyPCR‐amplified using metabarcoding primers and subsequently sequenced. As a proof of concept, we apply our methods to address a topical ecological question: is host specificity a major characteristic of fungus‐associated communities, that is, do different fungus species harbour different communities of associated organisms? Based on an analysis of 312 fungal fruiting bodies representing 10 species in five genera from three orders, we show that molecular methods are suitable for studying this rich natural microcosm. Comparing to previous knowledge based on rearing and morphology‐based identifications, we find a species‐rich assemblage characterized by a low degree of host specialization. Our method opens up new horizons for molecular analyses of fungus‐associated interaction webs and communities.