Abstract P4-10-07: Tumor ER protein modulation, molecular characterization and monitoring of cfDNA in phase 1 study of LSZ102 and LSZ102 + ribociclib in patients with ER+ MBC
Authors: Jhaveri Komal , Juric Dejan , Cresta Sara , Yap Yoon-Sim , Duhoux Francois P. , Terret Catherine , Layman Rachel , Balbin Alejandro , Sheng Qing , Liao Serena , Crystal Adam , Curigliano Giuseppe 
Published: March 2020

Background: LSZ102 is an orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that inhibits estrogen receptor (ER) mediated gene transcription, induces receptor degradation, and blocks ER-dependent cell growth in preclinical models. This first-in-human study of LSZ102 is evaluating LSZ102 as a single agent (SA) and in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib or the PI3K inhibitor alpelisib (BYL719) in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC). Here, we present the immunohistochemistry (IHC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) data obtained from a subset of pts treated with either LSZ102 SA or the combination of LSZ102 and ribociclib. Methods: ER IHC was performed with an antirabbit antibody (clone SP1) on FFPE samples collected at baseline and cycle 1 day 15 (C1D15), and the ER value was reported using the H-score method. A Novartis exploratory PanCancer next-generation sequencing ~600 gene panel for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was used on plasma samples collected from pts treated with SA or the combination at baseline, on treatment (C1D1, C2D1/C3D1, C5D1, CXD1) at radiological assessments and at the end of treatment (EOT). Results: One hundred fifty-three pts with MBC (median number of prior lines of therapy in metastatic setting = 4; range, 0-10) were treated with LSZ102 SA or the combination of LSZ102 and ribociclib (data cutoff, November 30, 2018). ER protein levels, assessed by IHC H-score, are downregulated in about 75% of C1D15 samples in both SA and combination-treated pts. In this cohort of heavily pretreated pts, cfDNA sequencing was performed on approximately 400 samples from 135 pts, and the genomic landscape is described both at baseline and EOT for pts with detectable ctDNA (~77% of pts). At baseline, approximately 40% of pts had mutations in the ESR1 ligand-binding domain (LBD), and approximately 40% of pts had PIK3CA activating mutations. LBD ESR1 mutations were mainly subclonal with several pts harboring multiple mutations at baseline. The frequency of ESR1 Y537S mutation was no higher in EOT samples after LSZ102 treatment compared with baseline. Moreover, the tumor reduction of target lesions &gt; 30% was observed in pts harboring different baseline ESR1 mutations, including Y537S, treated with either SA or the combination. Furthermore, the longitudinal cfDNA analysis showed a consistent reduction of the overall circulating tumor fraction (ctDNA fraction), from baseline for the majority of patients who achieved either partial response or stable disease with either SA or the combination. Conclusions: Consistent with being a SERD, LSZ102 treatment leads to the degradation of ER in tumor biopsies. The addition of ribociclib does not alter LSZ102-induced ER downregulation. The most common genetic alterations found in cfDNA collected from enrolled ER+ MBC patients before the study treatment were ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations. Importantly, the antitumor activity was observed in pts harboring a variety of ESR1 LBD mutations. Furthermore, enrichment of ESR1 Y537S mutations was not observed after LSZ102 treatment. Finally, the on-treatment longitudinal assessment of cfDNA measuring ctDNA fraction and mutation dynamics is maturing as a useful tool for monitoring the treatment efficacy.

Citation Format: Komal Jhaveri, Dejan Juric, Sara Cresta, Yoon-Sim Yap, Francois P. Duhoux, Catherine Terret, Rachel Layman, Alejandro Balbin, Qing Sheng, Serena Liao, Adam Crystal, Giuseppe Curigliano. Tumor ER protein modulation, molecular characterization and monitoring of cfDNA in phase 1 study of LSZ102 and LSZ102 + ribociclib in patients with ER+ MBC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-07.