Biomarkers of systemic treatment response in people with psoriasis: a scoping review
Authors: Corbett Mark , Ramessur Ravi , Marshall David , Acencio Marcio L. , Ostaszewski Marek , Barbosa Ines A. , Dand Nick , Di Meglio Paola , Haddad Salma , Jensen Andreas H.M. , Koopmann Witte , Mahil Satveer K. , Rahmatulla Seher , Rastrick Joe , Saklatvala Jake , Weidinger Stephan , Wright Kath , Eyerich Kilian , Barker Jonathan N. , Ndlovu Matladi , Conrad Curdin , Skov Lone , Smith Catherine H. ,   on behalf of the BIOMAP consortium
Published: May 2022

Background

Responses to the systemic treatments commonly used to treat psoriasis vary. Biomarkers that accurately predict effectiveness and safety would enable targeted treatment selection, improved patient outcomes and more cost-effective healthcare.

Objectives

To perform a scoping review to identify and catalogue candidate biomarkers of systemic treatment response in psoriasis for the translational research community.

Methods

A systematic search of CENTRAL, Embase, LILACS and MEDLINE was performed for relevant articles published between 1990 and December 2021. Eligibility criteria were studies involving patients with psoriasis (any age, n ≥ 50) reporting biomarkers associated with systemic treatment response. The main outcomes were any measure of systemic treatment efficacy or safety. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second; studies meeting minimal quality criteria (use of methods to control for confounding) were formally assessed for bias. Candidate biomarkers were identified by an expert multistakeholder group using a majority voting consensus exercise and mapped to relevant cellular and molecular pathways.

Results

Of 71 included studies (67 studying effectiveness outcomes and eight safety outcomes; four studied both), most reported genomic or proteomic biomarkers associated with response to biologics (48 studies). Methodological or reporting limitations frequently compromised the interpretation of findings, including inadequate control for key covariates, lack of adjustment for multiple testing, and selective outcome reporting. We identified candidate biomarkers of efficacy to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors [variation in CARD14, CDKAL1, IL1B, IL12B and IL17RA loci, and lipopolysaccharide-induced phosphorylation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB in type 2 dendritic cells] and ustekinumab (HLA-C*06:02 and variation in an IL1B locus). None were supported by sufficient evidence for clinical use without further validation studies. Candidate biomarkers were found to be involved in the immune cellular crosstalk implicated in psoriasis pathogenesis, most notably antigen presentation, T helper (Th)17 cell differentiation, positive regulation of NF-κB, and Th17 cell activation.

Conclusions

This comprehensive catalogue provides a key resource for researchers and reveals a diverse range of biomarker types and outcomes in the included studies. The candidate biomarkers identified require further evaluation in methodologically robust studies to establish potential clinical utility. Future studies should aim to address the common methodological limitations highlighted in this review to expedite discovery and validation of biomarkers for clinical use.

What is already known about this topic?  Responses to the systemic treatments commonly used to treat psoriasis vary.Biomarkers that accurately predict effectiveness and safety would enable targeted treatment selection, improved patient outcomes and more cost-effective healthcare.

What does this study add?  This review provides a comprehensive catalogue of investigated biomarkers of systemic treatment response in psoriasis.A diverse range of biomarker types and outcomes was found in the included studies, serving as a key resource for the translational research community.