Effects of histamine H1‐, H2‐ and H3‐receptor selective drugs on the mechanical activity of guinea‐pig small and large intestine
Authors: Leurs R. , Brozius M.M. , Smit M.J. , Bast A. , Timmerman H. 
Published: July 2012

In this study we have evaluated the possible contribution of acetylcholine release in histamine‐induced contractions of guinea‐pig large and small intestinal smooth muscle. Moreover, the presence of the histamine receptor types involved in smooth muscle relaxations and inhibition of electrically‐induced twitches was studied by use of several selective agents.

Histamine‐induced contractions appeared to be a pure H1‐receptor‐mediated effect. Responses were not attenuated by the presence of 0.1 μm atropine and were competitively and stereoselectively inhibited by the two enantiomers of chlorpheniramine with pA2 values of 6.73 ± 0.08, 7.30 ± 0.06, 6.93 ± 0.03 and 7.19 ± 0.04 for the l‐isomer and 8.63 ± 0.09, 8.85 ± 0.09, 9.01 ± 0.16 and 8.98 ± 0.11 for the d‐isomer in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon, respectively.

There appeared to be a marked regional difference in sensitivity to histamine. In ileal and jejunal preparations pD2 values of 6.24 ± 0.06 (n = 22) and 6.37 ± 0.07 (n = 22) were found, whereas the pD2 values in the duodenum and colon were 5.55 ± 0.05 (n = 36) and 5.68 + 0.06 (n = 31) respectively.

This regional difference in sensitivity to histamine was not due to variations in receptor affinity since pA2 values for the two enantiomers of chlorpheniramine did not differ markedly among the four tested preparations. Since a similar variation in sensitivity was found for methacholine, it is likely that the signal transfer mechanism in guinea‐pig ileum and jejunum is more efficient than in the duodenum and colon.

The H2‐agonists dimaprit and impromidine relaxed methacholine‐precontracted (± 70% of maximum contraction) intestine at high concentrations (pD2 values of 3.79 ± 0.03 and 4.44 ± 0.09 for the jejunum). These relaxations could not be antagonized by 0.1 μm tiotidine, famotidine or mifentidine and were observed in all parts of the intestine investigated.

The dimaprit analogues nordimaprit and homodimaprit (inactive at H2‐receptors) were equipotent in relaxing the methacholine‐precontracted smooth muscle. Since several H2‐antagonists were also able to produce relaxations, we do not consider these relaxations to be mediated by a H2‐receptor subtype, but to be due to some nonspecific effects at the high concentrations used.

The histamine receptor involved in the inhibition of electrically‐induced contractions in the presence of atropine could be classified as an H3‐receptor effect. In all parts of the intestine the H3‐agonist R‐α‐methylhistamine inhibited the twitches with pD2 values ranging from 8.10 + 0.06 (ileum) to 8.27 ± 0.03 (colon). This effect was competitively antagonized with the selective H3‐antagonist thioperamine (pA2 values are 8.09 ± 0.07, 8.13 ± 0.05, 8.15 ± 0.04 and 8.36 ± 0.04 in duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon, respectively.

The guinea‐pig intestine is a suitable preparation for the evaluation of either H1‐ or H3‐receptor effects. H2‐receptors, causing smooth muscle relaxation appear not to be present in our preparations. At high concentrations of H2‐receptor agents (agonists and antagonists) relaxations might be observed, due to unknown nonspecific effects.