Users perceived contribution and usability of mobile health applications and connected objects: patients and health care providers perspectives from an exploratory survey (Preprint)
Authors: Saussier Christel , Faurennes Frédéric , Méchin Hubert , Mignon Laurent , Ponthieu Solène , Varlet Vincent , Verleye Camille 
Published: April 2018

BACKGROUND

Technology is nowadays omnipresent. Using New Information and Communications Technologies in the health sector is promising and intended to be beneficial, both for patient disease prevention and care.

The Lab e-Santé, a French think tank, aims to further advance knowledge of the use and practices of digital health tools, identify obstacles in their use, and issue recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

The Lab e-Santé conducted an exploratory study in order to get preliminary data regarding the appropriation, satisfaction and global use in real life of health applications and connected objects.
This initial survey would allow to explore, within MHCs (Multidisciplinary health centers), the usability and the perceived contribution of the tools from both HCPs and patients’ viewpoints and provide preliminary inputs regarding the barriers and the drivers of connected health.

METHODS

The Lab e-santé recruited a total of 10 facilities from the exhaustive database of French MHCs.
HCPs from those MHC were provided with iPads on which the m-health application was installed. They were also provided with three types of connected devices: weighting scales, blood pressure monitors and activity trackers.

VirtualSanté and VirtualSanté Pro applications were especially developed for the survey. VirtualSanté allowed to compile all the patient’s data collected from a connected health device, and share these data with the health professional in their dedicated professional application, VirtualSanté Pro.

During a 5-month period, participating health professionals were instructed to include patients with chronic diseases, aged 18 years and above, who agreed to participate.

RESULTS

This exploratory study addressed the perceived contribution and usability of health technologies from both patients and their HCPs.

Our findings as described below suggest that there is a dichotomy between HCPs and patients’ perception about connected health usefulness. HCPs are more confident in a potential contribution of connected health for their patients than the patients themselves.
Patients didn’t express any benefit 6 months later and the device became a source of anxiety for some of them. One possible explanation may be the multiple technical issues users faced during the survey including the installation of the applications on non-compatible devices, the initial connection between the object and the application or technical bugs during use.
For the same reasons, HCPs found it time-consuming and difficult to integrate in their everyday practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Today many people are optimistic about the concept of mHealth. However, to use these devices and have high acceptance, both HCPs and patients need to be aware of the existence and usefulness of applications and connected objects then trust them. Tools should be personalized and adaptive, as far as possible, or at least be adapted to the good user profile. The latter should be motivated, properly trained, educated and supported for assuring an appropriate, useful and sustainable use.