Estimation of Transport and Kinetic Parameters of a Solid-State Lithium Battery
Authors: Parke Caitlin D. , Kolluri Suryanarayana , Subramanian Venkat R. 
Published: February 2020

Research on solid-state batteries began in the 1950s to address issues that stem from the liquid electrolyte, such as electrolyte leakage. Today, with implementation of batteries in larger systems like electric vehicles or the grid, the performance demands are greatly increased, which compounds the safety issues associated with electrolyte decomposition. In solid state batteries, a solid electrolyte is utilized, which eliminates the use of flammable, organic solvents in the cell. Solid state electrolytes transport ions with better selectivity than liquid electrolytes, which reduces unwanted side reactions. Liquid electrolyte decomposition can also accelerate passivation of the solid/electrolyte interface1. Solid-state batteries may be the key to the development of safe lithium batteries.

Lithium batteries are exciting next generation energy storage as lithium anodes have the most negative potential of any known material, which enables lithium anodes to have a high energy density and high discharge voltage. However, lithium batteries suffer from many issues that have prevented their widespread commercialization as rechargeable cells. When lithium metal batteries are cycled, the anode is used non-uniformly which leads to the development of finger-like dendrites. Dendrite formation leads to cell short circuits, higher rates of adverse reactions, and large volume changes. These problems are major safety issues but also account for the low Coulombic efficiency and poor cycling performance2. The utilization of all-solid-state cells for lithium batteries can reduce the growth of dendrites3, which greatly improves safety2. However, solid-state batteries suffer from high resistances at ambient temperatures.

Wu et al.4 studied an all-solid-state battery composed of a lithium foil anode and a cathode made of lithium ferric phosphate (LFP) particles in a block copolymer matrix. In the cathode, the electronic conduction is facilitated by a conducting polymer, poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT). The conductivity of this semiconductor polymer depends on the electrode potential because the conducting polymer is oxidized and reduced when transporting the electrons.

The electronic conductivity of the cathode polymer matrix without the LFP active particles was measured as a function of the voltage, and this experimental fit was used with a macro-homogeneous continuum model developed by Newman and associates5,6. The model output was relatively independent of the rate and failed to capture the trend of the experimental data. The authors then reduced the electronic conductivity until the best agreement between the experimental data and the model was achieved4.

This talk explores the possibility of obtaining better fits for the model predictions by performing detailed estimation of different parameters that affect the performance of the system by combining different/robust simulation and estimation methods.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for the financial support from the Battery 500 Consortium and the Clean Energy Institute (CEI) at the University of Washington.

References

Takada, K., AIP Conf. Proc., 1765, (2016).

Cheng, X. B., Zhang, R., Zhao, C. Z. & Zhang, Q., Chem. Rev., 117, 10403–10473 (2017).

Kim, J. G. et al., J. Power Sources, 282, 299–322 (2015).

Wu, S.-L., Javier, A. E., Devaux, D., Balsara, N. P. & Srinivasan, V. J., Electrochem. Soc., 161, A1836–A1843 (2014).

Newman, J. S. & Tobias, C. W., J. Electrochem. Soc., 109, 1183 (1962).

Doyle, M., Fuller, T. F. & Newman, J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 140, 1526 (1993).