Monitoring Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Multiple Myeloma By Tracking Serum M-Protein Using Mass Spectrometry
Authors: Fan Huishou , Wang Bing , Qiu Lugui , Ma Bin , An Gang 
Published: December 2023

Objective： We performed this retrospective real-world study to evaluate the clinical utility of blood-based mass spectrometry for longitudinal M-protein monitoring during the disease course of patients of multiple myeloma（MM）.

Methods：We initially analyzed serial serum samples of 56 patients with MM by clonal peptide MS Method named EasyM MS, then we compared the MS results with those determined using serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE),multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), next-generation flow cytometry (NGF), to establish the concordance between different disease-monitoring protocols. A sensitivity for MFC MRD negativity of at least 1×10 -4 anda sensitivity for NGF MRD negativity of at least 1×10 -5.Additionally, we determined the optimal cutoff value of EasyM MS negativity to satisfy both the sensitivity and specificity between MS and NGF, and explored the prognostic impact of MS-MRD status.

Results：The median diagnostic age of 56 NDMM patients was 56 years old, including 34 males (60.7%). There were 38 patients with IgG type MP and 18 patients with IgA type MP. 47 patients (83.9%) chose to receive proteasome inhibitor - based induction therapy, and a total of 44 patients (78.6%) received first-line ASCT treatment.Among 56 MM patients，38 patients with IgG type MP can further identify IgG subclasses through mass spectrometry. Additionally, 56 patients with MM have successfully used MS to identify their unique clonal peptides of MP. 56 patients provided a total of 447 samples of serum and all sequential serum samples were successfully measured by using the MS method. The initial comparison of the performance of blood-based MS-MRD with that of the conventional M-protein diagnostic method IFE used . Among the 397 comparable results collected at similar timepoints, 70.8% (281/397) of the samples were both M-MRD- and IFE-positive, 3.3% (13/397) were both MS-MRD- and IFE-negative, 25.7% (102/397) were MS-MRD-positive and IFE-negative.Flow cytometry MRD was performed on 218 bone marrow aspirates in this cohort, including 126 analyzed with MFC and 92 analyzed with NGF. MS-MRD detection was also performed on comparable serum acquired at the same time points. The sensitivity of MS-MRD was 100.0% in comparison with both MFC and NGF, with specificity of 1.9% and 22.2%, respectively. Considering the overly high sensitivity of EasyM at a cutoff of dotp &gt;0.9, we used the sensitivity of NGF as the standard for detection (i.e., a detection sensitivity ≤10 -5) and set the EasyM MS negative cutoff value using ROC analysis, determined to be &lt;1.86% of that at first diagnosis. Using these assumptions, we again performed the aforementioned analyses comparing the sensitivity and specificity between EasyM and IFE, MFC, and NGF. Under this scenario, the sensitivity of EasyM remained high in comparison with IFE (88.3%), MFC (85.1%), and NGF (93.2%), but the specificity was also greatly increased to 90.4%, 55.8%, and 93.2%, respectively. We then divided patients into MS-positive and MS-negative groups according to whether they achieved MS-MRD negativity, and median PFS and OS were calculated for each group. The median PFS of the MS-positive and MS-negative groups was 20.6 (95% CI: 16.6, 24.6) and 61.8 (39.7, 83.9) months, respectively . The median OS was 55.7 (95% CI:31.8, 79.5) months for the MS-positive group and not reached (NR) for the MS-negative group ,Both mPFS and mOS were significantly longer among the MS-negative group compared with the MS-positive group (both p &lt; 0.001).

Conclusion：EasyM exhibits high sensitivity and minimally invasive technological advantages, and also has important significance in efficacy evaluation and prognosis evaluation. In the future, EasyM MS detection can be used as a minimally invasive MRD monitoring method based on peripheral blood in clinical practice.