Two snakebite antivenoms have potential to reduce Eswatini’s dependency upon a single, increasingly unavailable product: results of preclinical efficacy testing
Authors: Menzies Stefanie K. , Litschka-Koen Thea , Edge Rebecca J. , Alsolaiss Jaffer , Crittenden Edouard , Hall Steven R. , Westhorpe Adam , Thomas Brent , Murray James , Shongwe Nondusimo , Padidar Sara , Lalloo David G. , Casewell Nicholas R. , Pons Jonathan , Harrison Robert A. 
Published: May 2022

Background

Snakebite is a major public health concern in Eswatini, where treatment relies upon one antivenom – SAIMR Polyvalent. Although effective in treating snakebite, SAIMR Polyvalent is difficult to source outside its manufacturing country (South Africa) and is dauntingly expensive. We compared the preclinical venom-neutralising efficacy of two alternative antivenoms and SAIMR Polyvalent against the lethal and tissue-destructive effects of venoms from five species of medically important snakes using in vivo murine assays. The test antivenoms were ‘Panafrican’ manufactured by Instituto Clodomiro Picado and ‘PANAF’ manufactured by Premium Serums & Vaccines.

Principal Findings

In vivo murine preclinical studies identified both test antivenoms were equally or more effective than SAIMR Polyvalent at neutralising lethal and tissue-destructive effects of Naja mossambica venom. Both test antivenoms were less effective than SAIMR Polyvalent at neutralising the lethal effects of Bitis arietans, Dendroaspis polylepis, Hemachatus haemachatus and Naja annulifera venoms, but similarly effective at neutralising tissue damage induced by B. arietans and H. haemachatus venoms.

In vitro immunological assays identified that IgG titres and toxin-specificities of the test antivenoms were comparable to SAIMR Polyvalent. Plasma clotting disturbances by H. haemachatus and N. mossambica were effectively neutralised by the test antivenoms, whereas SAIMR Polyvalent failed to neutralise this bioactivity of N. mossambica venom. The SVMP activity of B. arietans venom was equally reduced by all three antivenoms. The PLA2 activities of H. haemachatus and N. mossambica were effectively neutralised by all three antivenoms.

Conclusions

Panafrican outperformed PANAF, though both were less poly-specifically effective than SAIMR Polyvalent. The efficacy of these antivenoms against the lethal and tissue-destructive effects of N. mossambica venom, the most common biting species in Eswatini, identify that Panafrican and PANAF antivenoms offer effective alternatives to SAIMR for the treatment of snakebite in Eswatini, and potentially for neighbouring countries.

Author Summary

Treatment of snakebite in Eswatini is reliant upon a single antivenom (SAIMR Polyvalent) manufactured in South Africa. This highly effective product is increasingly difficult to source and is expensive – alternative/additional antivenoms are urgently required to improve patient outcomes following snake envenoming. Using murine preclinical venom toxicity and antivenom efficacy assays, we identified two alternative antivenoms whose venom-neutralising characteristics, while less poly-specifically effective than SAIMR Polyvalent, were as effective against the lethal and tissue-destructive effects of the most common biting snake in Eswatini – Naja mossambica. This murine data, already shared with the Eswatini Ministry of Health, supports and justifies human testing of these two antivenoms in Eswatini because increasing the availability of effective and affordable treatments could resolve the current medical dependency of Eswatini snakebite patients upon a single, rarely available and expensive product.