Abstract PS11-02: Comprehensive comparative analysis of invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer cases in great lakes breast cancer consortium
Authors: Oesterreich Steffi , Nasrazadani Azadeh , Zou Jian , Onger Tiffany , Wright Matthew , Tseng George , Ramaswamy Bhuvana , Lee Adrian V , Williams Nicole , Kruse Megan 
Published: February 2021

Background: Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the second most common histologic subtype of breast cancer following invasive ductal cancer (IDC). ILC accounts for ~10-15% of all breast cancers (~26-40,000 cases annually in the US) and ranks as the 6th most common cancer in women in the US. While there is increasing recognition that ILC has distinct clinical, histologic, molecular, and biological characteristics compared to IDC, it remains understudied. There are very few large cohort analyses comparing clinic-pathological features of ILC, and therefore we performed a large multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Methods: Investigators from UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital/OSU, and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute/CWRU formed the Great Lakes Breast Cancer consortium, and worked with their respective cancer registries to collect comprehensive data on patients with IDC and ILC seen at their institutions between 1990 and 2017. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare clinic-pathological features, treatments, metastases sites, and co-morbidities. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. A total of N=38,175 records (N=15,792 for UPMC, N=13,040 for CCF, and N=9,343 for OSU) were included in the study. Results Among the N=38,175 records, we identified N=30,100 unique IDC (not otherwise specific, NOS) (89.3%) and N=3,618 unique ILC cases (10.7%). There were no significant differences between IDC and ILC with respect to laterality of the cancer (IDC: Left 51%, Right 49%; 0.2% Other vs ILC: Left 51%, Right 48%, Other 0.5%) and body mass index (IDC: 28.4 vs ILC: 28.2). In contrast, we observed significant difference with respect to age - patients with ILC were significantly older (61.2 vs 57.5 years; p&lt;0.0001), and there were significant differences in race (7.6% vs 9.2% African American patients in ILC vs IDC, respectively; p=0.004). Among ILC cases, there were fewer grade III tumors (11.4% vs 40.3% in IDC; p&lt;0.0001). ILCs were more frequently stage III (16.6% vs 8.0% in IDC) and stage IV (3.7% vs 2.4% in IDC) (p&lt;0.0001), and ILC were significantly larger than IDC (13.7% T3 vs 2.8% in IDC, p&lt;0.0001). There was also significantly more lymph node involvement in patients with ILC (N2: 5.3% vs 4.0%; N3: 4.6% vs 1.5%) (p&lt;0.0001). The ILC cohort had significantly fewer HER2+ cases (5.5% vs 18.1% in IDC) (p&lt;0.0001), and the proportion of patients with a high recurrence score as determined by 21 gene recurrence score was significantly lower in ILC compared to IDC (1.7% vs 10.4% in IDC; p&lt;0.0001). As expected, there was a significant enrichment of ER+ tumors in ILC (96.1% compared to IDC (76.6%) (p&lt;0.0001). Age, stage, grade, ER, Her2, and lymph node involvement remained significantly associated with histology in a logistic regression analysis. KM analysis showed significantly shortened disease-free (p=0.041) and overall survival (p&lt;0.0001) for patients with ER+ ILC (N=2,565) compared to ER+ IDC N=17,278). The estimated 5yr and 10yr DFS rates for patients with IDC are 0.94 and 0.89, and for ILC 0.94 and 0.86, confirming prior data of late recurrences in patients with ILC. Conclusions: In the largest cohort of patients with ILC made possible by multi-center collaborations we show that lobular histology carries distinct prognostic implications and that outcomes are significantly worse. This highlights the need for more ILC research and clinical trials for patients with ILC.

Citation Format: Steffi Oesterreich, Azadeh Nasrazadani, Jian Zou, Tiffany Onger, Matthew Wright, George Tseng, Bhuvana Ramaswamy, Adrian V Lee, Nicole Williams, Megan Kruse. Comprehensive comparative analysis of invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer cases in great lakes breast cancer consortium [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-02.