A Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of the Proposed Rituximab Biosimilar GP2013 Versus Rituximab in Patients with Previously Untreated Advanced Follicular Lymphoma
Authors: Jurczak Wojciech , Ilidia Moreira , Govindbabu Kanaka Setty , Eduardo Munhoz , Ascuncion Echeveste Maria , Giri Pratyush , Nelson Castro , Juliana Pereira , Luiza Akria , Sergey Alexeev , Dzhelil Osmanov , Pultar Philippe , Cherfi Azzeddine , Zhu Peijuan , Amersdorffer Jutta 
Published: October 2019

Background: GP2013 is being developed as a proposed biosimilar to EU approved originator Rituximab (RTX). The stepwise global development program for GP2013 is comprised of structural and functional characterization with highly sensitive analytical methods to ensure comparability to the originator at the structural and physicochemical level, followed by confirmatory nonclinical testing and clinical studies to prove similarity between these two compounds

Methods: This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double blind, active-controlled, parallel group, confirmatory, Phase III trial comparing the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of GP2013 plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (GP2013-CVP) vs. RTX-CVP in 629 patients (159 centers; 26 countries) with previously untreated, advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL). The study comprised of combination treatment phase (6 months), maintenance phase (2 years) and follow up until 3 years after randomization; combination phase is completed and maintenance phase is ongoing. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 8 cycles of either GP2013-CVP (n=314) or RTX-CVP (n=315), followed by a maintenance phase (double-blind treatment with GP2013 or RTX) in responders [(complete response (CR) & partial response (PR)]. Patients were stratified by Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score risk group (low/intermediate risk [score 0 to 2] vs. high risk [score 3 to 5]) and geographic region. Percentage of patients with low risk , intermediate risk and high risk for GP2013-CVP vs RTX-CVP arms were 9.65% vs 11.1%, 34.0% vs 32.7% and 56.4% vs 56.2%, respectively. Comparison of overall response rate (ORR) between the two arms, based on blinded central review was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included other efficacy parameters: CR, PR, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); safety; immunogenicity; PK and PD.

Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms. The study met its primary objective showing equivalence of ORR (GP2013-CVP 87.1%, RTX-CVP 87.5%; difference GP2013-CVP - RTX-CVP was -0.40%, 95% confidence interval (CI)[-5.94%, 5.14%]). In combination phase, CR and PR rates were 14.8%, 72.3% and 13.4%, 74.1% for GP2013-CVP and RTX-CVP respectively. The median PFS and OS have not yet been reached, as data is still maturing. PK and PD of GP2013 were similar to RTX. The ratio of geometric mean for Cmax at cycle 4 day 1 was 1.00(90% CI [0.925; 1.09]). Similarity was also supported by the comparable results for AUC(0-21d), AUCall and Ctrough between GP2013 and RTX. Peripheral CD19+ B-cell counts were assessed as PD outcome; the ratio of geometric mean of area under effect-time curve (AUEC(0-21d)) was 0.939(90% CI [0.845; 1.04]), confirming the similarity between both products. Safety profile was similar in both arms with no new safety signals detected. In combination phase; adverse events (AE) were reported in 92.0% patients and incidence of serious AEs was similar between GP2013-CVP (22.8%) and RTX-CVP (20.0%) arms. The most common serious AE was febrile neutropenia (4.8% and 2.9% in GP2013-CVP and RTX-CVP arms respectively) (Table 1). A total of 11(1.8%) patients died during the combination phase, 4(1.3%) in GP2013-CVP and 7(2.2%) in RTX-CVP arm. Until data cut-off (10 Jul 2015), during the entire study, 35 patients died (18 in GP2013-CVP, 17 in the RTX-CVP arms); most common cause was Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 8(2.6%) in GP2013-CVP and 6(1.9%) in RTX-CVP arms. Overall, 5(1.9%) patients in GP2013-CVP and 3(1.1%) in the RTX-CVP arm developed anti-drug antibodies.

Conclusions: The proposed biosimilar GP2013 met the primary endpoint demonstrating equivalence in ORR to EU approved originator RTX. Similarity was demonstrated for efficacy, PK and PD parameters. Both arms demonstrated similar safety findings in patients with previously untreated advanced stage FL.

Disclosures

Pultar: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Cherfi:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Zhu:Sandoz Inc (Parent organization: Novartis): Employment. Amersdorffer:HEXAL AG (Parent organization- Novartis): Employment.