Achieving a Complete Molecular Remission Under Imatinib Therapy Is Associated with a Better Outcome in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients On Imatinib Frontline Therapy
Authors: Etienne Gabriel , Nicolini Nicolini E , Dulucq Stéphanie , Schmitt Anna , Hayette Sandrine , Lippert Éric , Tigaud Isabelle , Morisset Stephane , Bureau Caroline , Adiko Didier , Marit Gerald , Reiffers Josy , Mahon Francois-Xavier 
Published: October 2019

Abstract 3754

Background

Imatinib (IM) has dramatically improved the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. Some of them will achieve a so-call complete molecular remission (CMR) that allows when it is sustained treatment discontinuation without relapse.

Aims

Aims of this study were i) to evaluate the frequency of CMR in IM de novo CML-CP patients, ii) to identify baseline and ongoing predictive factors of CMR in patients who had achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) on IM therapy, iii) to assess if achieving a CMR with IM frontline therapy is associated with a better event and progression-free survival.

Methods

Unselected CML chronic phase patients under frontline IM therapy were considered. CMR was defined as undetectable BCR-ABL transcript with sensitivity of at least 4·5 log on two consecutive analyses at least two months apart.

Event-free survival (EFS) referred to survival without loss of complete hematologic response, loss of complete CCyR, detection of a BCR-ABL domain kinase point mutation associated with a high level of IM resistance, progression to accelerated or blastic phase, death of any cause on or off therapy, off treatment for toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) referred to survival without events previously described with the exception of treatment cessation for toxicity. EFS and PFS and overall survival were measured from the date of the first CCyR on therapy to the date of event.

Among patients who failed to achieve a CMR, patients with a follow-up lower than the observed median time to CMR and without any reported event were excluded for the identification of predictive factors of CMR and survival studies .

Results

266 patients diagnosed with CML-CP and treated with IM frontline were included between July 2000 and June 2010. The median age was 56 years (range 17–89), 160 (60%) were male. 86% of the patients received an initial IM daily dose of 400 mg. Sixty-five (24%) patients had IM dose increase to at least 600 mg. The median follow-up was 4,43 years (range 0.79–10 .8). At the time of the analysis 88 (33%) patients had stopped IM.

Two hundred and thirty three patients achieved a CCyR while on IM. Among them, 35 (13%) had a CCyR without major molecular response (MMR), 133 (50%) a CCyR with MMR without CMR, 65 (24%) a CCyR with CMR. The median time to CMR was 32.7 months (range 2.6 to 87.9). Forty six out of the 65 patients (70%) were still in CMR at the last follow-up with a median duration of CMR of 35.4 months (range, 4.1 to 91.5 months). For patients who achieved a CMR, the probability of remaining in CMR at two years is 68%.

Twelve out of 35 patients of the CCyR+MMR- group, 41 out of 133 patients of the CCyR+MMR+CMR- group had a follow-up below the observed median time to CMR and without any reported event during follow-up were excluded for the identification of CMR predictive factors and survival studies.

In multivariate analysis, spleen enlargement below the costal margin at diagnosis was negatively associated with the achievement of a CMR (HR:0.354 CI95%:0.192–0.654; p=0.0009) while shorter time from IM start to the first CCyR (CCyR before or after 12 months, HR:0.5; IC95%:0.27–0.95; p=0.034) and MMR (before or after 12 months; HR:0.2147;IC95%:0.092–0.5; p=0.00038) were strongly associated with the probability of achieving a CMR.

Patients who achieved a CMR had a better EFS and PFS than those with CCyR irrespective of MMR status (95.2% vs 64.7% vs 27.7% p=0.00124; 98.4% vs 82.3% vs 56% p=0.0335) (figures 1a and 1b). Overall survival was not different between the 3 groups.

Conclusion

This study points out that once patients achieve a CCyR on IM therapy, achieving a further deeper molecular response is associated with a better EFS and PFS, CMR confering the best outcome.

Disclosures:

Etienne: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nicolini:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ARIAD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahon:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy.