Trends in Outcomes and Quality of Care in Acute Myeloid Leukemia over Four Decades in Ontario, Canada.
Authors: Alibhai Shabbir M.H. , Leach Marc 
Published: October 2019

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with a poor prognosis, particularly in patients age 60 or older, who comprise the largest group of patients with AML. However, most published data on AML outcomes are institution-based rather than population-based, and are associated with significant selection and referral biases. There is a paucity of data on quality of care in this population. Recent data from specialized centres have shown that with careful patient selection and aggressive chemotherapy, a significant number of older AML patients can achieve improved outcomes. This suggests that variations in outcomes may exist and may be due to differential rates of treatment, referral to specialized centres, or other aspects of quality of care. However, this issue has not been formally examined.

We used the Ontario Cancer Registry, a comprehensive provincial cancer registry, to identify all patients diagnosed with AML in the province of Ontario between 1965 and 2003. Comorbidity was captured with the Charlson-Deyo Index. 30-day and one-year survival were examined across geographic region (8 regions), age group, and time using multivariable logistic regression. Referral to regional cancer centres (RCC) and receipt of chemotherapy were examined as quality of care indicators.

A total of 9,365 patients (mean age, 58.1 y, range 0–103 y) were diagnosed with AML between 1965 and 2003. Mean age at diagnosis increased from 49.1 y in 1965 to 62.4 y in 2003. 53.3% of patients were male. There was a steady increase in the number of new cases per year that was greater than the population growth rate. Overall, 75.5% and 33.3% of patients survived to 30 days and one year. 30-day survival was 67.4% among patients age 60+ vs. 85.6% among age 19–59. One-year survival was also considerably lower at 20.3% vs. 49.2%. Both 30-day and one-year survival decreased per decade of age from age 19 onwards. Although 30-day and one-year survival improved over time among patients age 19–59, similar improvements were not seen in patients age 60+. Among patients age 60+, 30-day survival varied from 62.0% to 72.3% across regions, whereas one-year survival varied from 16.8% to 25.4%. The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy declined with age (56.4% vs.28.0% among 19–59 vs. 60+ year olds). Similarly, significantly fewer patients age 60 or older were referred to a RCC (20.8% vs. 29.9%). Increasing age, increasing comorbidity, geographic region, lack of receipt of chemotherapy, and not being referred to a RCC were associated with greater 30-day mortality in multivariable models. Findings were similar for one-year survival although region was no longer a statistically significant predictor.

The incidence of AML has been increasing over the last four decades, with a slight preponderance among males. The mean age at diagnosis has also slowly increased. Although the prognosis has improved over time among children and adults up to age 59, it remains poor among those age 60 or older. Clinically important differences in survival were seen across geographic regions. These differences were only partially explained by receipt of chemotherapy and referral to specialized cancer centres. More detailed clinical information is required to determine if opportunities exist to enhance the quality of care and thereby improve outcomes among older adults with AML.