Live Video Mind-Body Program for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis, Comorbid Depression, and Obesity: Development and Feasibility Pilot Study (Preprint)
Authors: Mace Ryan A , Greenberg Jonathan , Lemaster Nicole , Duarte Brooke , Penn Terence , Kanaya Millan , Doorley James D , Burris Jessica L , Jacobs Cale A , Vranceanu Ana-Maria 
Published: November 2021

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common joint disorder in the United States and a leading cause of disability. Depression and obesity are highly comorbid with KOA and accelerate knee degeneration and disability through biopsychosocial mechanisms. Mind-body physical activity programs can engage biological, mechanical, and psychological mechanisms to improve outcomes in KOA, but such programs are not currently available.

OBJECTIVE

This mixed methods study aims to adapt a mind-body activity program for the unique needs of patients with KOA, depression, and obesity (GetActive-OA) delivered via live video.

METHODS

Participants were adults (aged ≥45 years) from rural Kentucky with obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), idiopathic KOA with mild to moderate radiographic changes, and elevated depressive symptoms (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire ≥10) recruited from 2 orthopedic centers. In phase 1, we developed GetActive-OA and the study protocol using qualitative focus group feedback from the study population (N=9; 2 focus groups, 90 minutes) and multidisciplinary expertise from clinical psychologists and orthopedic researchers. In phase 2, we explored the initial feasibility, credibility, and acceptability of GetActive-OA, live video delivery, and study procedures via an open pilot with exit interviews (N=5; 1 group). This research was guided by National Institutes of Health (NIH) model stage IA.

RESULTS

Phase 1 qualitative analyses revealed nuanced information about challenges with coping and increasing activity, high interest in a mind-body activity program, program participation facilitators (flexibility with technology) and barriers (amotivation and forgetfulness), and perceived challenges with data collection procedures (blood and urine samples and homework). Phase 2 quantitative analyses showed that GetActive-OA met most a priori feasibility markers: acceptability (80%), expectancy (100%), credibility (100%), clinician adherence (90%), homework adherence (80%), questionnaire data collection (100%), program satisfaction (100%), and safety (100%). Adherence to ActiGraph wear (80% baseline, 20% posttest) and collection of blood samples (60%) were low. Participation in GetActive-OA was associated with signals of improvements in general coping (Cohen <i>d</i>=2.41), pain catastrophizing (Cohen <i>d</i>=1.24), depression (Cohen <i>d</i>=0.88), anxiety (Cohen <i>d</i>=0.78), self-efficacy (Cohen <i>d</i>=0.73), pain (Cohen <i>d</i>=0.39), and KOA symptoms (Cohen <i>d</i>=0.36). Qualitative exit interviews confirmed quantitative findings and provided valuable information to optimize the program and protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with KOA, depression, and obesity from rural Kentucky were interested in a live video mind-body activity program. GetActive-OA shows promise; however, the program and protocol require further NIH stage I refinement before formal efficacy testing (NIH model stage II).

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100720