Abstract 2478: Elevating SOX2 inhibits the proliferation of tumor cells independently of DNA binding
Authors: Metz Ethan Patrick , Wilder Phillip J. , Rizzino Angie 
Published: July 2021

Purpose: The purpose of these studies was to understand how elevated SOX2 affects tumor cell proliferation. The stem cell transcription factor SOX2 has been implicated in ~20 different tumor types. Importantly, several studies have demonstrated that the effects of SOX2 during development and malignancy are dependent on its dosage. High levels of SOX2 in both contexts are associated with a quiescent, stem-like phenotype. SOX2high quiescent tumor cells present a significant clinical challenge as these cells are largely resistant to conventional chemotherapies and, thus, provide a reservoir to drive disease recurrence. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms through which elevated SOX2 inhibits tumor cell proliferation will provide insights into the biology of drug-resistant, quiescent tumor cells.

Methods: Tumor cell lines representative of medulloblastoma (MB) and colorectal (CRC) tumor cells were engineered for the doxycycline (Dox)-inducible expression of mutant forms of SOX2 that are unable to bind to DNA. One SOX2 mutant was created by substituting a proline for a glycine in the DNA binding domain of SOX2 [SOX2(G76P)]. A second SOX2 mutant replaces the DNA binding domain of SOX2 with the DNA binding domain of the yeast transcription factor Gal4 (Gal4-SOX2). The effects of elevating mutant forms of SOX2 on cell proliferation and the cell cycle distribution of the cells were compared to the effects of elevating wild-type SOX2.

Results: Our studies demonstrate that elevating SOX2, SOX2(G76P) or Gal4-SOX2 decreases the proliferation of MB and CRC cells to similar extents. In contrast, inducible expression of the DNA binding domain of Gal4 had no effect on cell proliferation. We previously reported that while SOX2 elevation inhibits the proliferation of a diverse set of tumor cell lines, it does not significantly alter their cell cycle distribution. Similarly, elevating SOX2(G76P) or Gal4-SOX2 did not significantly alter cell cycle distribution. To extend these findings, we are engineering additional SOX2 mutants to map the location of the domain of SOX2 required for growth inhibition. We recently engineered MB and CRC cells to express a mutant form of SOX2 that lacks the c-terminal R1 transactivation domain [Gal4-SOX2(ΔR1)]. Significantly, removing the R1 transactivation domain eliminated the growth inhibitory effects of Gal4-SOX2 when elevated.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that elevating two mutant forms of SOX2 that cannot bind to DNA inhibit the proliferation of tumor cell lines that represent two different forms of cancer, similar to the effects of wild-type SOX2. Equally important, our studies indicate that the c-terminal R1 transactivation domain of SOX2 is necessary, but no sufficient, to inhibit proliferation when SOX2 levels are elevated. Collectively, these findings and our previously published work indicate that elevated levels of SOX2 inhibit cell proliferation independently of DNA binding.

Citation Format: Ethan Patrick Metz, Phillip J. Wilder, Angie Rizzino. Elevating SOX2 inhibits the proliferation of tumor cells independently of DNA binding [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2478.