The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017
Authors: Saunois Marielle , Stavert Ann R. , Poulter Ben , Bousquet Philippe , Canadell Joseph G. , Jackson Robert B. , Raymond Peter A. , Dlugokencky Edward J. , Houweling Sander , Patra Prabir K. , Ciais Philippe , Arora Vivek K. , Bastviken David , Bergamaschi Peter , Blake Donald R. , Brailsford Gordon , Bruhwiler Lori , Carlson Kimberly M. , Carrol Mark , Castaldi Simona , Chandra Naveen , Crevoisier Cyril , Crill Patrick M. , Covey Kristofer , Curry Charles L. , Etiope Giuseppe , Frankenberg Christian , Gedney Nicola , Hegglin Michaela I. , Höglund-Isaksson Lena , Hugelius Gustaf , Ishizawa Misa , Ito Akihiko , Janssens-Maenhout Greet , Jensen Katherine M. , Joos Fortunat , Kleinen Thomas , Krummel Paul B. , Langenfelds Ray L. , Laruelle Goulven G. , Liu Licheng , Machida Toshinobu , Maksyutov Shamil , McDonald Kyle C. , McNorton Joe , Miller Paul A. , Melton Joe R. , Morino Isamu , Müller Jureck , Murgia-Flores Fabiola , Naik Vaishali , Niwa Yosuke , Noce Sergio , O'Doherty Simon , Parker Robert J. , Peng Changhui , Peng Shushi , Peters Glen P. , Prigent Catherine , Prinn Ronald , Ramonet Michel , Regnier Pierre , Riley William J. , Rosentreter Judith A. , Segers Arjo , Simpson Isobel J. , Shi Hao , Smith Steven J. , Steele L. Paul , Thornton Brett F. , Tian Hanqin , Tohjima Yasunori , Tubiello Francesco N. , Tsuruta Aki , Viovy Nicolas , Voulgarakis Apostolos , Weber Thomas S. , van Weele Michiel , van der Werf Guido R. , Weiss Ray F. , Worthy Doug , Wunch Debra , Yin Yi , Yoshida Yukio , Zhang Wenxin , Zhang Zhen , Zhao Yuanhong , Zheng Bo , Zhu Qing , Zhu Qiuan , Zhuang Qianlai 
Published: August 2019

Abstract. Understanding and quantifying the global methane (CH4) budget is important for assessing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. Atmospheric emissions and concentrations of CH4 are continuing to increase, making CH4 the second most important human-influenced greenhouse gas in terms of climate forcing, after carbon dioxide (CO2). Assessing the relative importance of CH4 in comparison to CO2 is complicated by its shorter atmospheric lifetime, stronger warming potential, and atmospheric growth rate variations over the past decade, the causes of which are still debated. Two major difficulties in reducing uncertainties arise from the variety of geographically overlapping CH4 sources and from the destruction of CH4 by short-lived hydroxyl radicals (OH). To address these difficulties, we have established a consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to synthesize and stimulate new research aimed at improving and regularly updating the global methane budget. Following Saunois et al. (2016), we present here the second version of the living review paper dedicated to the decadal methane budget, integrating results of top-down studies (atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up estimates (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, inventories of anthropogenic emissions, and data-driven extrapolations). For the 2008–2017 decade, global methane emissions are estimated by atmospheric inversions (top-down approach) to be 572 Tg CH4 yr−1 (range 538–593, corresponding to the minimum and maximum estimates of the ensemble), of which 357 Tg CH4 yr−1 or ~ 60 % are attributed to anthropogenic sources (range 50–65 %). This total emission is 27 Tg CH4 yr−1 larger than the value estimated for the period 2000–2009 and 24 Tg CH4 yr−1 larger than the one reported in the previous budget for the period 2003–2012 (Saunois et al. 2016). Since 2012, global CH4 emissions have been tracking the carbon intensive scenarios developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Gidden et al., 2019). Bottom-up methods suggest larger global emissions (737 Tg CH4 yr−1, range 583–880) than top-down inversion methods, mostly because of larger estimated natural emissions from sources such as natural wetlands, other inland water systems, and geological sources. However the strength of the atmospheric constraints on the top-down budget, suggest that these bottom-up emissions are overestimated. The latitudinal distribution of atmospheric-based emissions indicates a predominance of tropical emissions (~ 65 % of the global budget,