Evaluation of ventricular tachycardia inducibility after implementation of a standardized programmed ventricular stimulation protocol in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot
Authors: Herrador Galindo L , Francisco Pascual J , Santos Ortega A , Perez Rodon J , Benito B , Cantalapiedra Romero J , Bach Oller M , Maldonado J , Dos Subira L , Pijuan Domenech A , Miranda Barrio B , Gonzalez Fernandez V , Gordon Ramirez B , Ferreira Gonzalez I , Rivas Ganadara N 
Published: October 2021

Introduction

The electrophysiologic (EP) evaluation with programmed electrical stimulation (PVS) is generally recommended in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot and additional risk factors for sudden cardiac death. Nevertheless, different PVS protocols have been described. The aim of our study was to evaluate the differences in ventricular tachycardia (VT) inducibility of patients with TOF after the implementation of a standard PVS protocol in the EP laboratory of a Congenital Heart Disease reference center.

Methods

All patients with repaired TOF who underwent an EP study with PVS between January 2001 and October 2020 were included. The new standardized PVS protocol was performed in 2 ventricular sites (apex and outflow tract) with 3 drive trains (cycle lengths 400, 500 and 600ms) and up to 3 extrastimuli. In absence of VT induction, the protocol was repeated under isoprenaline infusion. This new protocol was implemented since January 2012. Non protocolized PVS studies before 2012 were defined as “Non-standardized”. Baseline clinical information about symptoms and previous arrhythmias was recorded as well as electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and cardiac MRI parameters. Finally, the follow-up events (ICD implantation, sudden cardiac death, global mortality, arrythmias and ICD therapies) were also retrospective recorded.

Results

A total of 154 EP studies with PVS were performed in 128 patients with repaired TOF. 31 of them were performed before the 1st January 2012 (non-standardized PVS) and 112 were performed with the new standardized protocol. The median follow-up was 6,5 years. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics except LVEF and RVEF, that were lower in the “Non-standardized PVS” group. There were no differences between the ventricular tachycardia inducibility of both protocols (22,3% vs 33,3%; p=0,162). The risk factors for VT inducibility were the QRS length (184,46ms vs 169,34 ms; p=0,038), the RVEF (36,25% vs 43,79; p=0,0007), the presence of ventricular ectopia (VE) (38,5% vs 20,0%; p=0,024) and previous VT (35,9% vs 13,9%; p=0,003). VT induction during EP study was related with ICD implantation (71,8% vs 21,7%, p≤0,001), VT (30,8% vs 20%, p&lt;0,001) and all kind of arrythmias (VT, non-sustained VT, VE and auricular flutter) (41% vs 21,7%, p=0,005) during follow-up. A total of 6 deaths (1 in the group with induced VT and 5 in the group with non-induced VT) were recorded.

Conclusions

The implementation of a standardized and more complete PVS protocol in patients with repaired TOF has not shown differences in the experience of our center. The risk factors for VT inducibility were the QRS length, the RVEF, the presence of ventricular ectopia and previous VT, which have also been reported as risk factors for sudden cardiac death in previous studies. The presence of VT induction entailed more ICD implantation and more arrythmias at follow-up.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.