Satellite Passive Microwave Sea-Ice Concentration Data Set Intercomparison: Closed Ice and Ship-Based Observations
Authors: Kern Stefan , Lavergne Thomas , Notz Dirk , Pedersen Leif Toudal , Tonboe Rasmus Tage , Saldo Roberto , Soerensen Atle MacDonald 
Published: June 2019

Abstract. Accurate sea-ice concentration (SIC) data are a pre-requisite to reliably monitor the polar sea-ice covers. Over the last four decades, many algorithms have been developed to retrieve the SIC from satellite microwave radiometry, some of them applied to generate long-term data products. We report on results of a systematic inter-comparison of ten global SIC data products at 12.5 to 50.0 km grid resolution for both the Arctic and the Antarctic. The products are compared with each other with respect to differences in SIC, sea-ice area (SIA), and sea-ice extent (SIE), and they are compared against a global winter-time near-100 % reference SIC data set for closed pack ice conditions and against global year-round ship-based visual observations of the sea-ice cover. We can group the products based on the observed inter-product consistency and differences of the inter-comparison results. Group I consists of data sets using the self-optimizing EUMETSAT-OSISAF – ESA-CCI algorithms. Group II includes data using the NASA-Team 2 and Comiso-Bootstrap algorithms, and the NOAA-NSIDC sea-ice concentration climate data record (CDR). The standard NASA-Team and the ARTIST Sea Ice (ASI) algorithms are put into a separate group III because of their often quite diverse results. Within group I and II evaluation results and intra-product differences are mostly very similar. For instance, among group I products, SIA agrees within ±100 000 km2 in both hemispheres during maximum and minimum sea-ice cover. Among group II products, satellite- minus ship-based SIC differences agree within ±0.7 %. Standing out with large negative differences to other products and evaluation data is the standard NASA-Team algorithm, in both hemispheres. The three CDRs of group I (SICCI-25km, SICCI-50km, and OSI-450) are biased low compared to the 100 % reference SIC with biases of −0.4 % to −1.0 % (Arctic) and −0.3 % to −1.1 % (Antarctic). Products of group II appear to be mostly biased high in the Arctic by between +1.0 % and +3.5 %, while their biases in the Antarctic only range from −0.2  to +0.9 %. The standard deviation is smaller in the Arctic for the quoted group I products: 1.9 % to 2.9 % and Antarctic: 2.5 % to 3.1 %, than for group II products: Arctic: 3.6 % to 5.0 %, Antarctic: 4.5 % to 5.4 %. Products of group I exhibit larger overall satellite- minus ship-based SIC differences than group II in both hemispheres. However, compared to group II, group I products’ standard deviations are smaller, correlations higher and evaluation results are less sensitive to seasonal changes. We discuss the impact of truncating the SIC distribution, as naturally retrieved by the algorithms around the 100 % sea-ice concentration end. We show that evaluation studies of such truncated SIC products can result in misleading statistics and favour data sets that systematically overestimate SIC. We describe a method to re-construct the un-truncated distribution of SIC before the evaluation is performed. On the basis of this evaluation, we open a discussion about the overestimation of SIC in data products, with far-reaching consequences for, e.g., surface heat-flux estimations in winter. We also document inconsistencies in the behaviour of the weather filters used in products of group II, and suggest advancing studies about the influence of these weather filters on SIA and SIE time-series and their trends.