#4793 DOES PRIOR ABDOMINAL SURGERY INFLUENCE TECHNIQUE SURVIVAL OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS?
Authors: Silva Rita , Fragoso Pedro , Reis Marina Sofia Rodrigues , Cerqueira Sofia , Romãozinho Catarina , Maia Pedro , Mendes Teresa , Alves Rui 
Published: June 2023

Background and Aims

Prior abdominal surgery may result in peritoneal membrane adhesions and fibrosis, compromising the success of peritoneal dialysis (PD). The impact of this factor on peritoneal membrane function and PD technique survival has not been adequately investigated. The aim of our study was to disclosure the effect of prior abdominal surgical procedures on PD technique survival (main outcome), efficacy rates and also evaluate the risk of infectious complications (secondaries outcomes).

Method

We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study, that included 155 PD patients followed at our unit, since September 2018 to September 2022. Two groups were created: G1 (without previous abdominal surgery) and G2 (with previous abdominal surgery). Demographic and clinical characteristics, such as age, gender, chronic kidney disease (CKD) etiology, time on PD program, dialytic efficacy (Kt/V), peritoneal equilibration test results and episodes of peritonitis were registered from our unit database. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistics version 23,0. The statistical hypothesis tests with p-value &lt;0,05 were considered significant.

Results

One-hundred and fifty-five patients (female: 50,9%) with a mean age of 55,4 ± 7 years were selected. The main CKD cause was glomerular diseases (n = 43, 27,7%), followed by uncertain etiology (n = 32, 20,6%) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (n = 21, 13,5%). G1 (n = 87; 56,1%) and G2 (n = 68; 43,9%) had similar distributions of gender (female: 50,6% vs 47,1%, p = 0,061), age (50,4± 9 vs 55,4 ±10 years, p = 0,076) and dialysis vintage (27,9 vs 28,2 months, p = 0,081). In G1, 62,1% of patients were on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (vs 55,9% in G2). The majority of patients were high-average transporters in both groups (58,6% vs 54,4%, p = 0,066). Previous comorbidities were (G1 vs G2): arterial hypertension (95,4% vs. 98,5%, p = 0,87), diabetes (27,6% vs. 26,5%, p = 0,83), heart failure (25,3% vs. 26,5%, p = 0,64), peripheral arterial disease (28,7% vs 35,3%, p = 0,082), body mass index &gt;30 kg/m2 (20,7% vs 29,4%, p = 0,072) and dyslipidemia (64,4% vs. 64,7%, p = 0,91). In G1, Kt/V was inferior a 1,7 in 36,8% of patients (vs 66,2% in G2, p&lt;0,001). Seven patients (8,1%) have reported more than one peritonitis during time in PD in group 1 (vs 32,4% in G2, p&lt;0,001). We found no differences in PD technique survival between both groups. Transition to hemodialysis happened in 26,4% of patients in G1 (vs 26,5% in G2, p = 0,092). Mortality rate was similar in both groups (6,9% vs 10,3%, p = 0,063).

Conclusion

According to our results, prior abdominal surgical procedures do not appear to compromise technique survival in patients on PD. Although, abdominal surgical events places PD patients in a higher risk of infectious complications and lower efficacy rates. Thus, this group of patients deserve a more detailed evaluation before starting PD, in order to understand if they are good candidates for the technique, as this may not be the most advantageous for them in the long term.