Implications for interpreting LRO LAMP observations from an examination of Apollo lunar soils spectroscopically and microscopically
Authors: Cahill Joshua , Cahill Karen , Hibbitts Karl , Livi Ken , Ramprasad Tarunika , Waller Dany , Retherford Kurt 
Published: July 2024

Introduction: Limited modern day laboratory far-ultraviolet (FUV) reflectance data of minerals, ices, and a near absence of Apollo soil measurements beyond those collected a few decades ago [1, 2], has hindered a more complete understanding of the lunar surface observations returned by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter&#8217;s Lyman-Alpha Mapping Project (LRO-LAMP) relative to other instruments. Measurements in the FUV are demanding compared to measurements in the near-ultraviolet (NUV) through thermal infrared (TIR), due to vacuum requirements and far lower signal available. However, since LAMP and the LRO Camera Wide Angle Camera (WAC) have been returning observations, the researchers of the lunar FUV have begun collecting topics that necessitate further investigation in a laboratory to gather additional context.Recent work at APL&#8217;s Laboratory for Spectroscopy under Planetary Environmental Conditions (LabSPEC) and SwRI&#8217;s Southwest-ultraviolet reflectance chamber (SwURC) facilities have been at the forefront to remedy this. Recent examinations of minerals, glasses, analogs, lunar soil simulants, and Apollo soils are under way or recently published [3-5]. Here, we examine the lunar highland Apollo soils 61220, 61141, and 62231. These lunar soils were selected to examine maturity in the FUV and in comparison with the MUV through the mid-infrared (MIR). They have similar low-iron and low-titanium chemistries, and a range of maturities with Is/FeO intensities of 9.2, 56, 91 for 61220, 61141, and 62231, respectively [6].Methods: Spectra were collected in the APL LabSPEC facility under high vacuum conditions (10-6-10-7 Torr). FUV-NUV data were collected using a McPherson monochromator (130-570 nm) using MgF2 as the standard and a scintillating material in front of a photomultiplier tube attached to chamber. VIS-NIR data are collected using a Spectra Vista Corporation (SVC) HR-1024i point spectrometer (350-2500 nm) using MgF2 as the standard. MIR data are collected with a Bruker Vertex 70 lab FTIR (1.8-8 &#956;m) using diffuse Au as the standard. Both use a halogen light source with beam splitters (Quartz, KBr) and both spectrometers are mounted outside the chamber at dedicated ports 60&#176; from the light source (i=15&#176;, e=45&#176;). The SVC and FTIR detectors are mounted on a linear stage that allows toggling between the two spectrometers. A full UV to MIR (~0.13 to ~8 &#956;m) spectrum is generated by combining 3 spectral ranges, scaled to the SVC VIS.Results: Starting in the familiar NIR to MIR (Fig. 1a), samples 61220, 61141, and 62231 show what is expected of their maturities. Samples 61141 and 62231 show the darkened albedo and reddened spectral slopes recognized in maturing soil samples. The 3 &#956;m water absorption feature may show slight attenuation, pending confirmation. In the VIS (Fig. 1b), these characteristics continue, but the differences in albedo between sample spectra decrease, particularly for the submature and mature samples (61141 &amp; 62231). This gradual decrease in albedo difference continues in the NUV until there no longer appears to be a statistical difference between 61141 and 62231 in the MUV (~225 nm; Fig. 1c). In the FUV (Fig. 1d), any remaining differences between immature, submature, and mature Apollo soils samples is gone by ~160 nm. Measurements