IMPETUS Stroke: Assessment of hospital infrastructure and workflow for implementation of uniform stroke care pathway in India
Authors: Salunkhe Manish , Haldar Partha , Bhatia Rohit , Prasad Deepshikha , Gupta Shweta , Srivastava M V Padma , Bhoi Sanjeev , Jha Menka , Samal Priyanka , Panda Samhita , Anand Sucharita , Kumar Niraj , Tiwari Ashutosh , Gopi S , Raju Garuda Butchi , Garg Jyoti , Chawla M P S , Ray Biman Kanti , Bhardwaj Amit , Verma Alok , Dongre Nikhil , Chhina Gurpreet , Sibia Raminder , Kaur Rupinderjeet , Zanzmera Paresh , Iype Thomas , Sulena  , Garg Ravinder , Kumar Ashok , Ranjan Abhay , Sardana Vijay , Maheshwari Dilip , Bhushan Bharat , Saluja Alvee , Darole Pramod , Bala Kiran , Dabla Surekha , Puri Inder , Shah Shalin , Ranga Gajender Singh , Nath Smita , Chandan Shishir , Malik Rupali 
Published: August 2023

Background:

India accounts for 13.3% of global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost due to stroke with a relatively younger age of onset compared to the Western population. In India’s public healthcare system, many stroke patients seek care at tertiary-level government-funded medical colleges where an optimal level of stroke care is expected. However, there are no studies from India that have assessed the quality of stroke care, including infrastructure, imaging facilities, or the availability of stroke care units in medical colleges.

Aim:

This study aimed to understand the existing protocols and management of acute stroke care across 22 medical colleges in India, as part of the baseline assessment of the ongoing IMPETUS stroke study.

Methods:

A semi-structured quantitative pre-tested questionnaire, developed based on review of literature and expert discussion, was mailed to 22 participating sites of the IMPETUS stroke study. The questionnaire assessed comprehensively all components of stroke care, including human resources, emergency system, in-hospital care, and secondary prevention. A descriptive analysis of their status was undertaken.

Results:

In the emergency services, limited stroke helpline numbers, 3/22 (14%); prenotification system, 5/22 (23%); and stroke-trained physicians were available, 6/22 (27%). One-third of hospitals did not have on-call neurologists. Although non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) was always available, 39% of hospitals were not doing computed tomography (CT) angiography and 13/22 (59%) were not doing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after routine working hours. Intravenous thrombolysis was being done in 20/22 (91%) hospitals, but 36% of hospitals did not provide it free of cost. Endovascular therapy was available only in 6/22 (27%) hospitals. The study highlighted the scarcity of multidisciplinary stroke teams, 8/22 (36%), and stroke units, 7/22 (32%). Lifesaving surgeries like hematoma evacuation, 11/22 (50%), and decompressive craniectomy, 9/22 (41%), were performed in limited numbers. The availability of occupational therapists, speech therapists, and cognitive rehabilitation was minimal.

Conclusion:

This study highlighted the current status of acute stroke management in publicly funded tertiary care hospitals. Lack of prenotification, limited number of stroke-trained physicians and neurosurgeons, relatively lesser provision of free thrombolytic agents, limited stroke units, and lack of rehabilitation services are areas needing urgent attention by policymakers and creation of sustainable education models for uniform stroke care by medical professionals across the country.