#5951 INFLUENCE OF DIETARY INTAKE ON GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS AND INFLAMMATION MARKERS IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS IN SLOVENIA
Authors: Majerr Mia , Knap Bojan , Kozjek Nada Rotovnik 
Published: June 2023

Background and Aims

Gastrointestinal symptoms are prevalent in patients with end-stage renal disease. Gastrointestinal symptoms in such patients are related to gastric hypomotility, increased medication intake, uremia, and changes in diet. In addition GI symptoms and problems associated with bowel dysfunction are a common cause of technique failure and poor dialysis efficacy. The reason for presence of some gastrointestinal symptoms is also chronic inflammatory state. Inflammation can have many negative effects, including decreased appetite, accelerated protein skeletal muscle breakdown and hypercatabolism.

Method

14 peritoneal dialysis patients were included in single Department of Nephrology in the University Medical Center in Ljubljana. All patients were interviewed by a dietitian and nutritional assessment was conducted. Gastrointestinal symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) with 7-grade Likert scale was used to evaluate the intensity of GI symptoms and Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) to classify patient's stool. The dietary intake of peritoneal dialysis patients was assessed using 7-day food diaries and analyzed with Prodi program (PRODI® 6.4 Expert program, Stuttgart, Deutschland). Body composition has been measured with bio impedance spectroscopy. Routine blood analysis was performed.

Results

Among 14 patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, most of them were male (71.4%) with average age of 53.07 ± 12.32 years. Average energy intake of 14 patients was 21.05 ± 5.72 kcal/kg body weight per day, average protein intake was 0.87 ± 0.39 g/ kg body weight per day and average fiber intake was 13.75 ± 7.25 g per day. They were inadequate according to the dietary guidelines for peritoneal dialysis patients. Average dietary protein-fiber index was 6.86 ± 3.81 per day. Average PRAL value was 15.84 ± 13.44 for women and 6.52 ± 17.99 for men. Average dietary potassium intake was 1917.80 ± 790.08 mg per day which corresponds to the guidelines for peritoneal dialysis patients and average potassium serum value 4.45 ± 0.42 mmol/L. GSRS questionnaire showed peritoneal patients had minor to mild discomfort in abdominal pain, constipation and indigestion GI symptom cluster. Patients’ self-analysis of stool showed BSFS Types 3.23 ± 1.64 if BSFS Types 3–5 are defined as normal stools. Dietary protein intake strongly correlated with dietary energy intake (r = 0.76, p = 0.003), dietary protein-fiber index strongly correlated with PRAL value (r = 0.70, p = 0.007) and dietary potassium intake moderately to strongly correlated with dietary fiber intake (r = 0.62, p = 0.025). Serum value of IL-6 strongly correlated with dietary potassium intake (r = 0.72, p = 0.006) and moderately to strongly correlated with dietary fiber intake (r = 0.6, p = 0.034). The correlation between dietary potassium intake and serum hsCRP was significant (p = 0.042). The correlation between Bristol stool consistency value and serum hsCRP was significant (p = 0.0255). The correlation between total GSRS score and serum value of albumin was significant (p = 0.0010). The correlation between total GSRS score and dietary potassium intake was significant (p = 0.0015). The correlation between total GSRS score and dietary protein-fiber index was significant (p = 0.0403).

Conclusion

Gastrointestinal diseases in peritoneal dialysis patients are comparatively understudied in the literature, despite having a significant impact on dialysis efficacy and the quality of life. Analysis of GSRS questionnaire showed that abdominal pain, constipation and indigestion caused minor to mild discomfort in PD patients. The analysis also showed that fiber intake, potassium intake and gastrointestinal symptoms are significantly associated with inflammation markers and are important contributing factors to chronic inflammatory state in these patients. Patients still lack the basic knowledge of nutrition, thus in the future nutritional consultations, innovative teaching techniques and help will be crucial to prevent the decline in nutritional status.