Retrospective Analysis of the Relationship between Transfusion Independence and Bone Marrow Fibrosis Reduction in Patients with Myelofibrosis Treated with Pacritinib Versus Ruxolitinib
Authors: Oh Stephen T. , Shammo Jamile , Gupta Vikas , McMullin Mary Frances , Bose Prithviraj , Mesa Ruben A. , Lucchesi Alessandro , Buckley Sarah , Suthar Purvi , Roman-Torres Karisse , Mascarenhas John , Ferrer Marin Francisca 
Published: December 2023

Background Pacritinib is a JAK1-sparing JAK2/IRAK1/ACVR1 inhibitor for treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). In addition to improving spleen volume and symptoms, pacritinib is associated with anemia benefit in MF patients. Recent in vivo studies have shown that dual JAK2/IRAK1 inhibition is associated with improvement in both cytopenias and bone marrow reticulin fibrosis (BMF) in an inflammation-driven murine MF model ( Cuenca Zamora E, et al. EHA 2023; P987 and P990). Here, we retrospectively analyzed the relationship between achieving transfusion independence and reduction in BMF in MF patients treated with pacritinib 200 mg twice daily (BID) vs ruxolitinib (RUX) on the phase 3 PERSIST-2 study.

Methods: PERSIST-2 enrolled patients with platelet counts ≤100 x 10 9/L. This analysis focused on pacritinib 200 mg BID and on patients who received RUX as best available therapy (BAT) who enrolled ≥12 weeks prior to study termination and who required red blood cell (RBC) transfusions at baseline. The proportion of patients who achieved transfusion independence response (TI-R, any 12-week interval with no RBC transfusions) was ascertained for pacritinib vs RUX. The proportion of patients with BMF reduction (≥1 grade decrease in reticulin fibrosis from baseline at week 24) was reported among patients on pacritinib achieving TI-R vs. non-response (NR).

Results: The analysis included 41 patients on pacritinib (median dose intensity 100% through week 24) and 18 on RUX (median daily dose 10mg at week 24). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, including median platelet count (41 vs 38 x 10 9/L) and median hemoglobin (8.7 vs 8.6 g/dL). All patients required RBC transfusion at baseline.

A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with pacritinib vs RUX achieved TI through week 24: 37% (n=15/41) vs 6% (n=1/18), P=0.023. Nominally, this trend held for those with baseline platelets &lt;50 x 10 9/L: 28% vs 8%, P=0.222. In addition, a greater percentage achieved a 50% reduction in RBC transfusions over any 12 weeks (49% vs 6%, P=0.001).

Paired bone marrow assessments at baseline and week 24 were available for 18/41 of patients on pacritinib, of whom 44% (8/18) achieved TI-R on study. The proportion of patients who experienced BMF reduction (&gt;=1 grade at any point) was significantly greater among TI-R (62.5%, n=5/8) compared to TI-NR (10%, n=1/10) on pacritinib ( P=0.043). Of the 5 patients who achieved TI-R and BMF reduction, all had grade 2-3 fibrosis at baseline, and 2 experienced a reduction from grade 3 to grade 1 ( Figure 1). By contrast, paired bone marrow biopsies were available for 5 patients on RUX, and there was no association between fibrosis reduction in TI-R (0%, n=0/1) and TI-NR (25%, n=1/4).

Conclusions: In cytopenic MF patients from PERSIST-2, TI-R on pacritinib was associated with BMF improvement. Though these results are based on a small sample size, they contrast with recent data suggesting no correlation between BMF reduction and TI-R on the JAK1/2 inhibitors momelotinib and ruxolitinib ( Oh ST, et al. Blood 2022;140 (Supp 1):821-23). While differences in study design could have impacted these results, these findings suggest that distinct inhibitory profiles may further distinguish the clinical impact of these treatments. Further studies are warranted to confirm the relationship between BMF reduction and anemia benefit in patients treated with pacritinib.

Study funded by CTI BioPharma Corp., a Sobi company