La0.8Sr0.2CoO3 Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Electrolysis: From Powder to the Fuel Cell Application
Authors: Hammad Mohaned , Gerschel Philipp , Angel Steven , Wiggers Hartmut , Apfel Ulf-Peter , Segets Doris 
Published: August 2024

In recent years, there has been a growing need for new renewable energy sources due to the rapid depletion of conventional energy sources and an escalating energy demand. Since environmental protection concerns are increasing, electrochemical processes are becoming increasingly essential [1]. Specifically, the focus has shifted towards storing energy in hydrogen and its subsequent conversion into on-demand electricity [2]. Here, hydrogen, generated via water electrolysis, serves as either an intermediary for generating energy carriers like liquid fuels or plays a key role as an energy carrier [3]. Despite significant efforts focused on enhancing electrolyzers for energy conversion, the progression towards practical application has encountered challenges stemming from differing catalyst development requisites in academic and industrial research. This study proposes a systematic approach for efficiently transitioning electrocatalysts from fundamental research to application readiness for alkaline oxygen evolution reactions.

Herein, La0.8Sr0.2CoO3 was chosen as a catalyst and compared with the benchmark material NiFe2O4. Initially, the La0.8Sr0.2CoO3 catalyst was successfully synthesized by scalable spray-flame synthesis. Following this, various inks were formulated utilizing different binders (Nafion®, Naf; Sustainion®, Sus). The dispersion stability of La0.8Sr0.2CoO3 and commercial NiFe2O4 inks was investigated in the presence of Nafion and Sustainion using analytical centrifugation and transmittograms. Subsequently, these selected dispersions were applied onto nickel substrates via spray coating techniques, ensuring a homogeneous catalyst distribution. Finally, the La0.8Sr0.2CoO3 and NiFe2O4 catalysts were subjected to extensive electrochemical evaluations, including glassy carbon rotating disk electrode, scanning droplet cell (SDC), compression cell, flow cell, and zero-gap cell, to evaluate the material performance. SDC findings highlight the excellent uniformity in La0.8Sr0.2CoO3 electrodes and NiFe2O4-Sustainion (standard deviation < 11%). However, the NiFe2O4-Sustainion film experienced delamination, exhibiting a standard deviation of 28%. SDC experiments offer advantages over various half-cell techniques by enabling the detection of any inhomogeneities or coating defects within the catalytic film. Additionally, complementary compression and flow cell experiments provide detailed information on the chemical and mechanical stress parameters resembling those in a full cell configuration. In assessing industrial applicability, the catalytic materials were undergone examination within a scalable full cell under industrial conditions (500 mA/cm² and 60 °C) utilizing a zero-gap cell setup. The observed trend in the full cell for the coated electrodes is as follows: La0.8Sr0.2CoO3-Naf > La0.8Sr0.2CoO3-Sus > NiFe2O4-Sus > NiFe2O4-Naf.

These findings achieved through a well-structured coherent workflow, enhance our knowledge of the electrocatalytic system and offer essential insights for implementing novel materials in large-scale industrial applications.

REFERENCES:

[1] M.-S. Park, J. Kim, K.J. Kim, J.-W. Lee, J.H. Kim, Y. Yamauchi, Porous nanoarchitectures of spinel-type transition metal oxides for electrochemical energy storage systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (2015) 30963–30977. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP05936D.

[2] J.R. Varcoe, P. Atanassov, D.R. Dekel, A.M. Herring, M.A. Hickner, P.A. Kohl, A.R. Kucernak, W.E. Mustain, K. Nijmeijer, K. Scott, T. Xu, L. Zhuang, Anion-exchange membranes in electrochemical energy systems, Energy Environ. Sci. 7 (2014) 3135–3191. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE01303D.

[3] C. Van Pham, D. Escalera-López, K. Mayrhofer, S. Cherevko, S. Thiele, Essentials of High Performance Water Electrolyzers – From Catalyst Layer Materials to Electrode Engineering, Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (2021) 2101998. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202101998.