No deterioration in function or volumetric parameters in elite athletes after SARS-CoV-2 infections compared to non-infected athletes: results from the ELITE cohort
Authors: Van Hattum J , Verwijs S M , Daems J J N , Boekholdt S M , Groenink M , Planken R N , Van Luijk-Snoeks R D , Van Der Randen A , Moen M H , Wijne C A C M , Nederveen A J , Pinto Y M , Wilde A A M , Jorstad H T 
Published: October 2022

Background/Introduction

SARS-CoV-2 (subclinical) myocarditis has been demonstrated in up to 5% in athletes, and is currently a topic being intensively investigated. However, more subtle changes in function and volumetric parameters have been less well documented, especially in elite athletes, who perform at the highest levels of sports, with potentially the most outspoken adaptation.

Purpose

To determine differences in cardiac function and volumetric parameters using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in elite athletes recovered from a SARS-CoV-2 infection as compared to non-infected elite athletes (controls).

Methods

We included elite athletes from the ELITE (Evaluation of Lifetime Intensive Top-level sports and Exercise) cohort, who voluntary undergo cardiovascular pre-participation screenings, which includes cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed with a positive-PCR or antibody test (if unvaccinated). The primary outcome was the incidence of structural cardiac changes on CMR, defined as LV/RV BSA indexed-EDV (EDVi), LV/RV BSA indexed-ESV (ESVi), LV/RV EF, presence of pathological late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (excluding hinge point fibrosis), and T1 times.

Results

We included 234 elite athletes, mean age 27 (±7), 39% female, with main athletic disciplines (≥10 hours/week) of cycling (24%), field hockey (13%), and water polo (12%). In total 69 elite athletes had documented SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 165 were documented as not exposed to SARS-CoV-2. The majority reported mild symptoms 61/69 (88%), 1/69 (1%) severe symptoms, and 7/69 (11%) no symptoms. Mean time between infection and CMR was 2.8 (±2) months. CMR showed no significant difference between elite athletes with SARS-CoV-2 and without (Table) in mean LVEDVi (117±19 vs 120±19 ml/m2, p=0.29), LVESVi (50.6±11 vs 53.2±11 ml/m2, p=0.12), LVEF (56.9% ±5 vs 55.8% ±5, p=0.14), RVEDVi (120±20 vs 122±19 ml/m2, p=0.56), RVESVi (54.5±11 vs 56.2±11 ml/m2, p=0.29), and RVEF (54.6% ±4 vs 53.9% ±5, p=0.23). In 4/69 (4.7%) vs 1/165 (1.3%) pathological non-ischemic pattern of myocardial LGE was present (≤20% of total LV mass), of which one athlete (1.2%) showed increased T1 time, all with no deterioration in right and left ventricle function and volumetric parameters (Figure) after SARS-CoV-2 infection. All athletes made a full recovery and returned to elite competitive sports.

Conclusion(s)

This cross-sectional study of elite athletes demonstrates that infection with SARS-CoV-2 is not associated with deterioration in cardiac function and volumetric parameters on CMR compared with non-infected athletes, also in the small subset of athletes with pathological LGE patterns after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to establish whether intensive sports is associated with long-term cardiac deleterious effects in elite athletes exposed to SARS-CoV-2.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Dutch Heart FoundationDutch National Olympic Committee & National Sports Federation (NOC*NSF)