Wearable biofeedback device to assess gait features and improve gait pattern in people with parkinson’s disease: a case series
Authors: Bowman Thomas , Pergolini Andrea , Carrozza Maria Chiara , Lencioni Tiziana , Marzegan Alberto , Meloni Mario , Vitiello Nicola , Crea Simona , Cattaneo Davide 
Published: June 2024

Introduction

People with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) show abnormal gait patterns compromising their independence and quality of life. Among all gait alterations due to PD, reduced step length, increased cadence, and decreased ground-reaction force during the loading response and push-off phases are the most common. Wearable biofeedback technologies offer the possibility to provide correlated single or multi-modal stimuli associated with specific gait events or gait performance, hence promoting subjects’ awareness of their gait disturbances. Moreover, the portability and applicability in clinical and home settings for gait rehabilitation increase the efficiency in the management of PD. The Wearable Vibrotactile Bidirectional Interface (BI) is a biofeedback device designed to extract gait features in real-time and deliver a customized vibrotactile stimulus at the waist of PD subjects synchronously with specific gait phases. The aims of this study were to measure the effect of the BI on gait parameters usually compromised by the typical bradykinetic gait and to assess its usability and safety in clinical practice.

Methods

In this case series, seven subjects (age: 70.4 ± 8.1 years; H&Y: 2.7 ± 0.3) used the BI and performed a test on a 10-meter walkway (10mWT) and a two-minute walk test (2MWT) as pre-training (Pre-trn) and post-training (Post-trn) assessments. Gait tests were executed in random order with (Bf) and without (No-Bf) the activation of the biofeedback stimulus. All subjects performed three training sessions of 40 min to familiarize themselves with the BI during walking activities. A descriptive analysis of gait parameters (i.e., gait speed, step length, cadence, walking distance, double-support phase) was carried out. The 2-sided Wilcoxon sign-test was used to assess differences between Bf and No-Bf assessments (p < 0.05).

Results

After training subjects improved gait speed (Pre-trn_No-Bf: 0.72(0.59,0.72) m/sec; Post-trn_Bf: 0.95(0.69,0.98) m/sec; p = 0.043) and step length (Pre-trn_No-Bf: 0.87(0.81,0.96) meters; Post-trn_Bf: 1.05(0.96,1.14) meters; p = 0.023) using the biofeedback during the 10mWT. Similarly, subjects’ walking distance improved (Pre-trn_No-Bf: 97.5 (80.3,110.8) meters; Post-trn_Bf: 118.5(99.3,129.3) meters; p = 0.028) and the duration of the double-support phase decreased (Pre-trn_No-Bf: 29.7(26.8,31.7) %; Post-trn_Bf: 27.2(24.6,28.7) %; p = 0.018) during the 2MWT. An immediate effect of the BI was detected in cadence (Pre-trn_No-Bf: 108(103.8,116.7) step/min; Pre-trn_Bf: 101.4(96.3,111.4) step/min; p = 0.028) at Pre-trn, and in walking distance at Post-trn (Post-trn_No-Bf: 112.5(97.5,124.5) meters; Post-trn_Bf: 118.5(99.3,129.3) meters; p = 0.043). SUS scores were 77.5 in five subjects and 80.3 in two subjects. In terms of safety, all subjects completed the protocol without any adverse events.

Conclusion

The BI seems to be usable and safe for PD users. Temporal gait parameters have been measured during clinical walking tests providing detailed outcomes. A short period of training with the BI suggests improvements in the gait patterns of people with PD. This research serves as preliminary support for future integration of the BI as an instrument for clinical assessment and rehabilitation in people with PD, both in hospital and remote environments.

Trial registration

The study protocol was registered (DGDMF.VI/P/I.5.i.m.2/2019/1297) and approved by the General Directorate of Medical Devices and Pharmaceutical Service of the Italian Ministry of Health and by the ethics committee of the Lombardy region (Milan, Italy).