Drone selection for disaster responses: an application of the stratified-best-worst method
Authors: Johny Dijoy , Padhi Sidhartha S. , Cheng T.C.E. 
Published: February 2025

Purpose

The purpose of this research is to address the challenges of selecting optimal drones for disaster response operations under uncertainties. Traditional static (deterministic) models often fail to capture the complexities and uncertainties of disaster scenarios. This study aims to develop a more resilient and adaptable decision-making framework by integrating the best-worst method (BWM) with stratified multi-criteria decision-making (SMCDM), focusing on various uncertainty scenarios such as weather conditions, communication challenges and navigation and control issues.

Design/methodology/approach

The methodology involves identifying seven essential criteria for drone evaluation, guided by contingency theory. The BWM derives optimal weights for each criterion by comparing the best and worst alternatives. The SMCDM incorporates different uncertainty scenarios into the decision-making process. Sensitivity analysis assesses the robustness of decisions under various criterion weightings and operational scenarios. This integrated approach is demonstrated through a practical application to the Kerala flood scenario.

Findings

The integrated stratified BWM method proves to be highly effective in adapting to different uncertainty scenarios, enabling decision-makers to consistently identify the optimal drone for disaster response. The method’s ability to account for uncertain conditions such as weather, communication challenges and navigation issues ensures that the optimal drone is selected based on the situation at hand.

Research limitations/implications

The methodology fills critical gaps in the literature by offering a comprehensive model that incorporates various scenarios and criteria for optimal drone selection. However, there are certain limitations. The reliance on expert opinions for criterion weightings introduces subjectivity, potentially affecting the generalizability of the results. In addition, the study’s focus on a single case, the Kerala floods, limits its applicability to other geographic contexts. Integrating real-time data analytics into the decision-making process could also enhance the model’s adaptability to evolving conditions and improve its practical relevance.

Practical implications

This research offers a practical, adaptable framework for selecting optimal drones in disaster scenarios. By integrating BWM with SMCDM, the methodology ensures decision-makers can account for real-time uncertainties, such as weather or communication disruptions, to make more informed choices. This leads to better resource allocation and more efficient disaster response operations, ultimately enhancing the speed and effectiveness of relief efforts in various contexts. The method’s ability to adjust based on scenario-specific factors ensures that drones are optimally deployed according to the unique demands of each disaster.

Social implications

By incorporating SMCDM, the proposed methodology assists decision-makers in appropriately choosing drones based on their characteristics crucial for specific scenarios, thereby enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of relief operations.

Originality/value

This study presents a unique integration of the BWM with SMCDM, creating a dynamic framework for drone selection that addresses the challenges posed by uncertain disaster environments. Unlike traditional methods, this approach allows decision-makers to adjust criteria based on evolving disaster conditions, resulting in more reliable and responsive drone deployment. The method bridges the gap in existing literature by offering a comprehensive tool for disaster response, providing new insights and practical applications for optimizing drone operations in complex, real-world scenarios.