Severity and frequency of menopausal hot flash symptoms are not associated with arterial stiffness in females
Authors: Pruter Wyatt , Harvey Ronée , Dillon Gabrielle , Baker Sarah 
Published: May 2024

Background: Females who experience menopausal hot flashes ([MHF]; episodes of sudden warmth and sweating) have greater risk of developing hypertension than females without MHF. MHF symptom severity and frequency are positively associated with hypertension. Considering that augmented arterial stiffness contributes to hypertension, this work aimed to investigate the relations between MHF severity and frequency with arterial stiffness. We hypothesized that females with moderate to severe MHF symptoms would exhibit greater arterial stiffness compared to females without MHF symptoms. Further, we hypothesized that there would be a positive relation between MHF frequency and arterial stiffness. Methods: Twenty-five females (51±5 [SD] years) with no history of hypertension or cardiovascular disease participated. The Menopausal Rating Scale was used to categorize participants by symptom severity (None MHF: n=7, Mild MHF: n=9, Moderate/Severe MHF: n=9). Participants self-reported MHF frequency over three consecutive days in real time using a hot flash diary (4±5 MHF/day, Range: 0-16). After 15 minutes of supine rest, brachial cuff blood pressures (sphygmomanometer) and heart rate (electrocardiogram) were recorded. Arterial stiffness was measured as pulse wave velocity ([PWV]; SphygmoCor®). PWV was measured using a carotid tonometer simultaneously with a leg cuff to capture blood pressure waveforms at the carotid and femoral sites. Aortic systolic pressure, aortic diastolic pressure, and augmentation index (AIx) were measured via pulse wave analysis ([PWA]; SphygmoCor®) using a brachial cuff. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Spearman Rho (ρ). Results: Age, body mass index, resting mean blood pressure, and resting heart rate were not different among MHF severity groups (P>0.05 for all). PWV was not different among severity groups (None: 6.2±0.67 vs. Mild: 6.4±1.0 vs. Moderate/Severe: 6.6±1.0 cm/s, P=0.72). MHF frequency did not correlate with PWV (P=0.42). Aortic systolic pressure (None: 110±6 vs. Mild: 114±5 vs. Moderate/Severe: 112±11 mmHg, P=0.66), aortic diastolic pressure (None: 76±9 vs. Mild: 77±6 vs. Moderate/Severe: 76±10 mmHg, P=0.93), and AIx (None: 31.9±9.0 vs. Mild: 38.7±11.1 vs. Moderate/Severe: 30.4±7.4 %, P=0.16) were not different among severity groups. MHF frequency did not correlate with metrics of PWA (Systolic: P=0.61; Diastolic: P=0.89, AIx: P=0.42). Conclusion: Arterial stiffness and metrics of PWA were not different among females with varying MHF symptom severity. MHF frequency was also not correlated with aortic stiffness and metrics of PWA. Other mechanisms of vascular function (e.g., autonomic function, vasodilation, and/or vasoconstriction) should be investigated to determine potential contributors of hypertension risk in females with MHF.

AHA 898649, NIH T32 DK07352, K01 HL148144, NCATS UL1 TR002377.

This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.