A Novel Mobile App to Identify Patients With Multimorbidity in the Emergency Setting: Development of an App and Feasibility Trial (Preprint)
Authors: Rosen Claire Barthlow , Roberts Sanford Eugene , Syvyk Solomiya , Finn Caitlin , Tong Jason , Wirtalla Christopher , Spinks Hunter , Kelz Rachel Rapaport 
Published: October 2022

BACKGROUND

Multimorbidity is associated with an increased risk of poor surgical outcomes among older adults; however, identifying multimorbidity in the clinical setting can be a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

We created the Multimorbid Patient Identifier App (MMApp) to easily identify patients with multimorbidity identified by the presence of a Qualifying Comorbidity Set and tested its feasibility for use in future clinical research, validation, and eventually to guide clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We adapted the Qualifying Comorbidity Sets’ claims-based definition of multimorbidity for clinical use through a modified Delphi approach and developed MMApp. A total of 10 residents input 5 hypothetical emergency general surgery patient scenarios, common among older adults, into the MMApp and examined MMApp test characteristics for a total of 50 trials. For MMApp, comorbidities selected for each scenario were recorded, along with the number of comorbidities correctly chosen, incorrectly chosen, and missed for each scenario. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying a patient as multimorbid using MMApp were calculated using composite data from all scenarios. To assess model feasibility, we compared the mean task completion by scenario to that of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-NSQIP-SRC) using paired <i>t</i> tests. Usability and satisfaction with MMApp were assessed using an 18-item questionnaire administered immediately after completing all 5 scenarios.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the task completion time between the MMApp and the ACS-NSQIP-SRC for scenarios A (86.3 seconds vs 74.3 seconds, <i>P</i>=.85) or C (58.4 seconds vs 68.9 seconds<i>,</i> <i>P=</i>.064), MMapp took less time for scenarios B (76.1 seconds vs 87.4 seconds, <i>P=</i>.03) and E (20.7 seconds vs 73 seconds, <i>P</i>&lt;.001), and more time for scenario D (78.8 seconds vs 58.5 seconds, <i>P=</i>.02). The MMApp identified multimorbidity with 96.7% (29/30) sensitivity and 95% (19/20) specificity. User feedback was positive regarding MMApp’s usability, efficiency, and usefulness.

CONCLUSIONS

The MMApp identified multimorbidity with high sensitivity and specificity and did not require significantly more time to complete than a commonly used web-based risk-stratification tool for most scenarios. Mean user times were well under 2 minutes. Feedback was overall positive from residents regarding the usability and usefulness of this app, even in the emergency general surgery setting. It would be feasible to use MMApp to identify patients with multimorbidity in the emergency general surgery setting for validation, research, and eventual clinical use. This type of mobile app could serve as a template for other research teams to create a tool to easily screen participants for potential enrollment.

CLINICALTRIAL