Attrition, physical integrity and insecticidal activity of long-lasting insecticidal nets in sub-Saharan Africa and modelling of their impact on vectorial capacity
Authors: Briet Olivier , Koenker Hannah , Norris Laura , Wiegand Ryan , Vanden Eng Jodi , Thackeray Alex , Williamson John , Gimnig John E. , Fortes Filomeno , Akogbeto Martin , Yadouleton Anges W. , Ombok Maurice , Bayoh M. Nabie , Mzilahowa Themba , Abílio Ana Paula , Mabunda Samuel , Cuamba Nelson , Diouf Elhadji , Konaté Lassana , Hamainza Busiku , Katebe-Sakala Cecilia , Ponce de León Gabriel , Asamoa Kwame , Wolkon Adam , Smith Stephen C. , Swamidoss Isabel , Green Mike , Gueye Salam , Mihigo Jules , Morgan Juliette , Dotson Ellen , Craig Allen S. , Tan Kathrine R. , Wirtz Robert A. , Smith Tom 
Published: August 2020

Background

Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the primary malaria prevention and control intervention in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa. While LLINs are expected to last at least 3 years under normal use conditions, they can lose effectiveness because they fall out of use, are discarded, repurposed, physically damaged, or lose insecticidal activity. The contributions of these different interrelated factors to durability of nets and their protection against malaria have been unclear.

Methods

Starting in 2009, LLIN durability studies were conducted in seven countries in Africa over 5 years. WHO-recommended measures of attrition, LLIN use, insecticidal activity, and physical integrity were recorded for eight different net brands. These data were combined with analyses of experimental hut data on feeding inhibition and killing effects of LLINs on both susceptible and pyrethroid resistant malaria vectors to estimate the protection against malaria transmission—in terms of vectorial capacity (VC)—provided by each net cohort over time. Impact on VC was then compared in hypothetical scenarios where one durability outcome measure was set at the best possible level while keeping the others at the observed levels.

Results

There was more variability in decay of protection over time by country than by net brand for three measures of durability (ratios of variance components 4.6, 4.4, and 1.8 times for LLIN survival, use, and integrity, respectively). In some countries, LLIN attrition was slow, but use declined rapidly. Non-use of LLINs generally had more effect on LLIN impact on VC than did attrition, hole formation, or insecticide loss.

Conclusions

There is much more variation in LLIN durability among countries than among net brands. Low levels of use may have a larger impact on effectiveness than does variation in attrition or LLIN degradation. The estimated entomological effects of chemical decay are relatively small, with physical decay probably more important as a driver of attrition and non-use than as a direct cause of loss of effect. Efforts to maximize LLIN impact in operational settings should focus on increasing LLIN usage, including through improvements in LLIN physical integrity. Further research is needed to understand household decisions related to LLIN use, including the influence of net durability and the presence of other nets in the household.