Baseline characteristics, management patterns and outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism and malignancy: Insights from a single-centre study
Authors: Hakgor A , Kultursay B , Keskin B , Sekban A , Tokgoz H C , Tanyeri S , Sirma D , Bulus C , Karagoz A , Tanboga I H , Kulahcioglu S , Ozdemir N , Kaymaz C 
Published: October 2024

Background and aim

The presence of malignancy is an important factor that increases the risk of venous thromboembolism. On the other hand, acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the main causes of death in this setting. In this study, we evaluated the impact of active malignancy on the treatment choices, and short and long term clinical outcomes in patients with acute PE.

Methods

In this study conducted in a tertiary center, 872 acute PE patients (age 61.6±16.8 years, female 57.5 %) from different risk categories were treated with thrombolytic, anticoagulant and catheter-based therapies in accordance with currently available acute PE guidelines. The population was retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups according to the presence of active malignancy.

Results

Active malignancy was documented in 129 (14.8 %) patients. In the groups with and without malignancy, the proportions of low-, intermediate-low-, intermediate-high-, and high-risk PE patients were 3.1 % vs. 15.6 %, 17.8 % vs. 16.7 %, 60.5 % vs. 60 %, and 18.6 % vs. 7.7 %, respectively (p&lt;0.001). While the two groups did not differ in terms of echocardiographic and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) characteristics, the presence of contraindications for thrombolytic were more frequent in the malignancy group (22.5% vs. 10.9%, p&lt;0.001). Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT), rheolytic thrombectomy (RT), systemic thrombolysis (ST) and anticoagulation-alone (AC) therapies were noted in 27.3 %, 6.4 %, 6.4 % and 49.7 % of overall PE patients. The RT and AC therapies were more frequent in PE patients with malignancy whereas ST and USAT were more frequently used in the absence of malignancy. Notably, lytic dosages and treatment durations in USAT and ST protocols were comparable between malignant and non-malignant PE cohorts. Regardless of the presence of malignancy and the treatment modality chosen, significant improvements were achieved in the clinical, echocardiographic and CTPA measures of the PE severity (p&lt;0.001 for all). Major and minor bleeding rates were also similar in both groups, while in-hospital and, as expected, long-term mortality were higher in the malignancy cohort. Active malignancy and PESI score were found to be independent predictors for composite end-point of 60-day mortality and PE-related rehospitalization (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 2.43; 95 % CI: 1.32 - 4.47, p=0.04) and (OR: 1.02; 95 % CI: 1.01-1.01, p&lt;0.001), respectively. Malignancy (OR: 3.5, 95 % CI: 2.15-5.75, p&lt; 0.001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 2.51, 95 % CI: 1.35-4.68, p&lt; 0.003) were independent predictors of long-term mortality.

Conclusion

Concomitant malignancy adversely affects both short- and long-term outcomes in patients with acute PE. Although these patients are more vulnerable, it is possible to achieve satisfactory treatment success with acceptable bleeding rates with the inclusion of catheter-based methods as treatment option.Survival plot