Prognostic significance of coexistent coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis
Authors: Sayers M , Rathod K , Akhtar M , Ozkor M , Treibel T , Lloyd G , Bhattacharyya S , Jones D A , Mathur A , Kennon S , Baumbach A , Mullen M J , Patel K P 
Published: October 2024

Background

The optimal management of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for aortic stenosis (AS) is uncertain. As TAVI expands into lower risk cohorts with longer life expectancies there is increasing need to determine the prognostic significance of coexistent CAD and identify which lesions may benefit from revascularisation.

Purpose

To evaluate the prognostic significance of coexistent CAD in patients with AS undergoing TAVI stratified according to myocardial territories at risk.

Methods

Using a retrospective, single-centre, observational registry, patients undergoing TAVI for severe AS between 2015 and 2020 were included. CAD was angiographically determined using computed tomography or invasive coronary angiography. CAD was stratified into 1) low-risk: &lt;70% stenosis in all major epicardial coronary arteries or &lt;50% in the left main (LM); 2) intermediate-risk: ≥70% stenosis in one or two arteries, except the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and LM; 3) high-risk: ≥70% stenosis in the proximal LAD, ≥70% stenosis in 3 arteries or LM stenosis ≥50%. Patients with previous CABG were categorised as high-risk if: ≥70% stenosis of 3 coronary grafts or graft supplying a proximally stenosed LAD; and intermediate-risk if: ≥70% stenosis of 1 or 2 non-LAD grafts. Baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes were compared between the 3 cohorts, with the impact of CAD on outcomes evaluated after adjustment for demographics and comorbidities.

Results

1805 patients were included; median age 84 (79-88), 51% male sex, median logistic Euroscore 13 (8-21). 1281 (71%), 384 (21%) and 140 (8%) patients were characterised as low-, intermediate- and high-risk coronary anatomy respectively. High risk patients were older than the other groups, however, did not have the highest prevalence of comorbidities (Table 1). Other than pacemaker implantation (9% vs 12% vs 6%, p=0.04), there were no differences in procedural complications or in-hospital mortality between groups (Table 1). At a median follow-up of 3.5 (2.3-4.8) years, 920 patients (51%) died, 292 (16%) had hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) and 565 patients (31%) had a major adverse coronary event (MACE); defined as either myocardial infarction, HHF or cardiovascular death. Coronary anatomical stratification was associated with MACE (Log rank p&lt;0.001) (Figure 1). After multivariate adjustment, high-risk anatomy was associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.68, p=0.013), HHF (HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.21, p=0.046) and MACE (HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.27-2.21, p&lt;0.001).

Conclusions

Whilst the presence of CAD does not impact TAVI procedural safety, untreated high-risk coronary anatomy is associated with future adverse events and may warrant intensive medical therapy and/or revascularisation.