Exploring the impacts of unprecedented climate extremes on forest ecosystems: hypotheses to guide modeling and experimental studies
Authors: Holm Jennifer A. , Medvigy David M. , Smith Benjamin , Dukes Jeffrey S. , Beier Claus , Mishurov Mikhail , Xu Xiangtao , Lichstein Jeremy W. , Allen Craig D. , Larsen Klaus S. , Luo Yiqi , Ficken Cari , Pockman William T. , Anderegg William R.L. , Rammig Anja 
Published: March 2020

&lt;p&gt;Climatic extreme events are expected to occur more frequently and potentially be stronger in the future, increasing the likelihood of unprecedented climate extremes (UCEs), or record-breaking events such as prolonged droughts, to occur. To prepare for UCEs and their impacts, we need to develop a better understanding of terrestrial ecosystem responses to events such as extreme drought. We know that intense, extreme droughts can substantially affect ecosystem stability and carbon cycling through increased plant mortality and delaying ecosystem recovery. Our ability to predict such effects is limited due to the lack of experiments focusing on climatic excursions beyond the range of historical experience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We explore the response of forest ecosystems to UCEs using two dynamic vegetation demographic models (VDMs), ED2 and LPJ-GUESS, in which the abundances of different plant functional types, as well as tree size- and age-class structure, are emergent properties of resource competition. We investigate the hypothesis that ecosystem responses to UCEs (e.g., unprecedented droughts) cannot be extrapolated from ecosystem responses to milder extremes, as a result of non-linear ecosystem responses (e.g. due to plant plasticity, functional diversity, and trait combinations). We evaluate each model&amp;#8217;s mechanisms and state variables prior, during, and after a continuum of drought intensities ultimately reaching very extreme drought scenarios (i.e., 0% to 100% reduction in precipitation for drought durations of 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year scenarios) at two dry forested sites: Palo Verde, Costa Rica (i.e. tropical) and EucFACE, Australia (i.e. temperate). Both models produce nonlinear responses to these UCEs. Due to differences in model structure and process representation, the model&amp;#8217;s sensitivity of biomass loss diverged based on either duration or intensity of droughts, as well as different model responses at each site. Biomass losses in ED2 are sensitive to drought duration, while in LPJ-GUESS they are mainly driven by drought intensity. Elevated atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentrations alone did not buffer the ecosystems from carbon losses during UCEs in the majority of our simulations. Our findings highlight discrepancies in process formulations and uncertainties in models, notably related to availability in plant carbohydrate storage and the diversity of plant hydraulic schemes. This shows that different hypotheses of plant responses to UCEs exist in two similar models, reflecting knowledge gaps, which should be tested with gap-informed field experiments. This iterative modeling-experiment framework would help improve predictions of terrestrial ecosystem responses and climate feedbacks.&lt;/p&gt;