Systematic review and network meta-analysis with individual participant data on Cord Management at Preterm Birth (iCOMP): study protocol
Authors: Seidler Anna Lene , Duley Lelia , Katheria Anup , De Paco Matallana Catalina , Dempsey Eugene , Rabe Heike , Kattwinkel John , Mercer Judith , Josephsen Justin , Fairchild Karen , Andersson Ola , Hosono Shigeharu , Sundaram Venkataseshan , Datta Vikram , El-Naggar Walid , Tarnow-Mordi William , Debray Thomas P.A. , Hooper Stuart , Kluckow Martin , Polglase Graeme , Davis Peter , Montgomery Alan , Hunter Kylie E , Barba Angie , Simes John , Askie Lisa 
Published: October 2019

Introduction

Timing of cord clamping and other cord management strategies may improve outcomes at preterm birth. However, it is unclear whether benefits apply to all preterm subgroups such as those who usually receive immediate neonatal care. Previous and current trials compare various policies, including immediate cord clamping, time- or physiology-based deferred cord clamping, and cord milking. Individual participant data (IPD) enables exploration of different strategies within subgroups. Network meta-analysis (NMA) enables comparison and ranking of all available interventions using a combination of direct and indirect comparisons.

Objectives

1) To evaluate the effectiveness of cord management strategies for preterm infants on neonatal mortality and morbidity overall and for different participant characteristics using IPD meta-analysis; and 2) to evaluate and rank the effect of different cord management strategies for preterm births on mortality and other key outcomes using NMA.

Methods and analysis

We will conduct a systematic search of Medline, Embase, clinical trial registries, and other sources for all planned, ongoing and completed randomised controlled trials comparing alternative cord management strategies at preterm birth (before 37 weeks’ gestation). IPD will be sought for all trials. First, deferred clamping and cord milking will be compared with immediate clamping in pairwise IPD meta-analyses. The primary outcome will be death prior to hospital discharge. Effect differences will be explored for pre-specified subgroups of participants. Second, all identified cord management strategies will be compared and ranked in an IPD NMA for the primary outcome and the key secondary outcomes intraventricular haemorrhage (any grade) and infant blood transfusions (any). Treatment effect differences by participant characteristics will be identified. Inconsistency and heterogeneity will be explored.

Ethics and dissemination

Approved by University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2018/886). Results will be relevant to clinicians, guideline-developers and policy-makers, and will be disseminated via publications, presentations, and media releases.

Registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12619001305112.

STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

This will be the most comprehensive review to date of interventions for umbilical cord management in preterm infants and the findings will be highly relevant to clinicians and guideline developers

The use of individual participant data will allow assessment of the best treatment option for key subgroups of participants

Network meta-analysis will enable the comparison and ranking of all available treatment options using direct and indirect evidence

For some of the trials it will not be possible to obtain individual participant data, so published aggregate results will be used instead

Risk of bias in the primary trials will be assessed using Cochrane criteria, and certainty of evidence for the meta-analyses will be appraised using the GRADE approach for the pairwise comparisons, and the CINeMA approach for the network meta-analysis