Preliminary results of the non-invasive cardiac radioablation for ventricular tachycardia study; an in silico dosimetric comparison of photon vs proton radiotherapy for ventricular arrhythmias
Authors: Vicini Scajola L , Pignalosa L , Dusi V , Sanzo A , Valentini A , Vitolo V , Mantovani L , Colombo Gomez L M , Bonzano E , Vicentini A , Savastano S , Petracci B , Baldi E , Mirandola A , Rordorf R 
Published: October 2024

Background

Stereotactic arrhythmia radio-ablation (STAR) has been proposed as an alternative treatment for refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients who are unsuitable or refractory to standard catheter ablation (CA). It consists in the application of external beam radiotherapy in a single dose of 25 Gy to the target areas. Most of the STAR treatments performed so far used photon radiotherapy. As compared to photons, particle therapy with protons, based on its finite penetration depth in tissue, might have the potential to reduce the dose to surrounding healthy tissues thus lowering the risk of side effects.

Purpose

The purpose of this in silico simulation study was to evaluate the feasibility of STAR with protons in patients with VA and to compare the doses of the organs at risk (OARs) in photon and proton treatment plans.

Methods

14 patients (11 males) candidates to standard CA for VA were enrolled. ECG gated CT scans in expiratory breath-hold, and standard electroanatomical mapping were performed in each patients to reconstruct a 3D bipolar voltage map and identify the ablation target. Based on the information obtained by the contouring of the ablation target three treatment plans were simulated: one with photons, and two with protons - with and without cardiac gating- to assess the doses at the OARs.

Results

The median age was 68.5 (63.25-71.5), all patients had a history of recurrent VA and the indication for treatment with CA. 7 patients had an ischemic cardiomyopathy, 4 an idiopathic cardiomyopathy and 3 ventricular ectopic beats without structural heart disease. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 40±11% and 8 out of 14 patients were ICD carriers.

Both photons and protons treatment plans reached the goals for target coverage (25 Gy on 98% of the target volume). A statistically significant reduction in the mean maximum dose (Dmax) to some OARs was observed in proton compared to photon plans (see table 1). Specifically, the Dmax delivered to the mitral valve, vena cava, descending aorta, esophagus and to the lungs have been largely reduced with the proton plans. However, in some specific cases, a higher maximum dose was observed for protons in structures close or overlapping with the target, mainly due to the need of an additional margin in the treatment plan to account for proton range uncertainty. The use of cardiac gating did not show a significant dose reduction to OARs compared to the non-gated proton plan.

Conclusion

The preliminary results of our in silico simulation study suggest that STAR therapy with the use of protons might be associated with a significant dose reduction to the surrounding organs. Nevertheless, the choice of the best treatment should be evaluated on a case by-case strategy since some specific cases may be better suitable for photon treatment.Table 1