Molecular analysis of mutations at the HPRT and TK loci of human lymphoblastoid cells after combined treatments with 3′‐azido‐3′‐deoxythymidine and 2′,3′‐dideoxyinosine†
Authors: Meng Quanxin , Su Ting , O'Neill J. Patrick , Walker Vernon E. 
Published: October 2002

Combinations of antiretroviral drugs that include nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are superior to single‐agent regimens in treating or preventing HIV infection, but the potential long‐term health hazards of these treatments in humans are uncertain. In earlier studies, our group found that coexposure of TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells to 3′‐azido‐2′,3′‐dideoxythymidine (AZT) and 2′,3′‐dideoxyinosine (ddI), the first two NRTIs approved by the FDA as antiretroviral drugs, produced multiplicative synergistic enhancement of DNA incorporation of AZT and mutagenic responses in both the HPRT and TK reporter genes, as compared with single‐drug exposures (Meng Q et al. [2000a]: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:12667–12671). The purpose of the current study was to characterize the mutational specificity of equimolar mixtures of 100 μM or 300 μM AZT + ddI at the HPRT and TK loci of exposed cells vs. unexposed control cells, and to compare the resulting mutational spectra data to those previously found in cells exposed to AZT alone (Sussman H et al. [1999]: Mutat Res 429:249–259; Meng Q et al. [2000b]: Toxicol Sci 54:322–329). Molecular analyses of HPRT mutant clones were performed by reverse transcription–mediated production of cDNA, PCR amplification, and cDNA sequencing to define small DNA alterations, followed by multiplex PCR amplification of genomic DNA to define the fractions of deletion events. TK mutants with complete gene deletions were distinguished by Southern blot analysis. The observed HPRT mutational categories included point mutations, microinsertions/microdeletions, splicing‐error mutations, and macrodeletions including partial and complete gene deletions. The only significant difference or shift in the mutational spectra for NRTI‐treated cells vs. control cells was the increase in the frequency of complete TK gene deletions following exposures (for 3 days) to 300 μM AZT–ddI (P = 0.034, chi‐square test of homogeneity); however, statistical analyses comparing the observed mutant fraction values (measured mutant frequency × percent of a class of mutation) between control and NRTI‐treated cells for each class of mutation showed that the occurrences of complete gene deletions of both HPRT and TK were significantly elevated over background values (0.34 × 10−6 in HPRT and 6.0 × 10−6 in TK) at exposure levels of 100 μM AZT–ddI (i.e., 1.94 × 10−6 in HPRT and 18.6 × 10−6 in TK) and 300 μM AZT–ddI (i.e., 5.6 × 10−6 in HPRT and 34.6 × 10−6 in TK) (P < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U‐statistic). These treatment‐related increases in complete gene deletions were consistent with the spectra data for AZT alone (ibid.) and with the known mode of action of AZT and ddI as DNA chain terminators. In addition, cotreatments of ddI with AZT led to substantial absolute increases in the mutant fraction of other classes of mutations, unlike cells exposed solely to AZT [e.g., the frequency of point mutations among HPRT mutants was significantly increased by 130 and 323% over the background value (4.25 × 10−6) in cells exposed to 100 and 300 μM AZT–ddI, respectively]. These results indicate that, at the same time that AZT–ddI potentiates therapeutic or prophylactic efficacy, the use of a second NRTI with AZT may confer a greater cancer risk, characterized by a spectrum of mutations that deviates from that produced solely by AZT. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 39:282–295, 2002. Published 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.