Impact of initial rhythm control with cryoballoon ablation versus drug therapy on atrial fibrillation recurrence and quality of life: results from the Cryo-FIRST study
Authors: Pavlovic N , Kuniss M , Velagic V , Hermida JS , Healey S , Arena G , Badenco N , Meyer C , Chen J , Iacopino S , Anselme F , Kaplon RE , Chierchia GB 
Published: May 2021

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Medtronic

OnBehalf

The Cryo-FIRST Investigators

Background

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) as a first-line rhythm control strategy is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) for preventing atrial arrhythmia recurrence; however, the impact of first-line CBA specifically on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and quality of life (QoL) has not been well characterized.

Purpose

To compare AF recurrence and QoL following first-line CBA vs. AAD therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF within the CryoFIRST trial (NCT01803438).

Methods

Patients with recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal AF who had not been administered class I or III AAD therapy for &gt;48 hours were enrolled at 18 sites in 9 countries. Patients were randomized (1:1) to CBA or AAD treatment (Class I or III). Subjects were followed by 7-day Holter at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Time-to-first AF recurrence outside of a 90-day blanking period was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.  QoL was evaluated using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) v2 questionnaires.

Results

Of the 218 randomized subjects, 187 (86%) completed the 12-month follow-up. By intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, freedom from AF after blanking was achieved in 86.6% in the CBA and 74.5% in the AAD group (p = 0.023).  There was no difference in the time-to-first serious adverse event between groups. In total, 84.3% of patients in the CBA vs. 75.0% of patients in the AAD arm had a clinically important improvement (≥5 points) in the AFEQT summary score.  The adjusted mean difference in the AFEQT summary score at 12 months was 9.9 points higher in the CBA group (95% CI: 5.5-14.2; P &lt; 0.001).  All AFEQT subscale scores were more favorable in the CBA vs. AAD group at 12 months.  There were no significant group differences in any of the SF-36 health domain scores at 12 months in the ITT analysis.  In the per-protocol analysis, clinically important and significant group differences in favor of CBA were observed at 12 months for 3 of 8 SF-36 health domain scores (physical functioning, general health and social functioning).

Conclusion

CBA is superior to AAD for preventing AF recurrence and improving AF-specific QoL in patients with paroxysmal AF. AFEQT Scores at Baseline and 12 MonthsAFEQT Score, Mean ± Standard DeviationCBAAADAdjusted Mean Difference at 12 Months (CBA vs. AAD)p-valueBaseline12 MonthsBaseline12 MonthsDaily Activities65.3 ± 25.887.8 ± 17.161.0 ± 27.976.6 ± 25.48.9 (3.2-14.6)0.002Symptoms59.9 ± 24.888.8 ± 15.658.4 ± 25.280.9 ± 22.27.1 (1.5-12.7)0.014Treatment Concern59.9 ± 23.189.8 ± 14.060.4 ± 24.577.7 ± 22.212.7 (7.9-17.5)&lt;0.001AFEQT, Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life questionnaire. CBA, cryoballoon ablation. AAD antiarrhythmic drug.Abstract Figure. Freedom From Atrial Fibrillation