Failure to detect DNA in blastocoel fluid is associated with a higher live birth rate in both PGT-A and conventional IVF/ICSI cycles
Authors: Gianaroli L , Perruzza D , Albanese C , Azzena S , Tabanelli C , Ferraretti Anna P , Magli M Cristina 
Published: May 2023

STUDY QUESTION

Is the presence of DNA in the blastocoel fluid (BF) of expanded blastocysts, assessed by whole genome amplification (WGA), associated with the clinical outcome at the first transfer?

SUMMARY ANSWER

At the first transfer, blastocysts with negative BF-WGA have more chance to implant and to develop to term than those with positive BF-WGA results, both in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) cycles (where only euploid blastocysts resulting from the chromosomal analysis of trophectoderm (TE) biopsies were transferred) and in IVF/ICSI conventional cycles.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Retrospective studies conducted in patients undergoing PGT-A have shown that the incidence of negative BF-WGA was significantly higher in TE-euploid blastocysts than in TE-aneuploid blastocysts. In addition, after the transfer of TE-euploid blastocysts, the ongoing clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the group with negative BF-WGA compared with those with positive BF-WGA.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A prospective cohort study including 102 consecutive PGT-A patients (Group 1) and 88 consecutive conventional IVF/ICSI patients (Group 2), was conducted between January 2019 and December 2021.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

In both groups, BFs were collected from expanded blastocysts of high grade and processed for WGA. DNA amplification was evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis for the presence (positive BF-WGA) or absence (negative BF-WGA) of a band. Directly after the BF retrieval, blastocysts from Group 1 underwent TE biopsy and vitrification. In Group 2, blastocysts were vitrified immediately after BF collection. In Group 1, only euploid blastocysts were considered for transfer according to the results of TE biopsies. In both groups, the selection of the blastocyst to be transferred was based on BF-WGA results giving priority, if available, to those with negative amplification. The primary outcome investigated was the live birth rate (LBR) at the first transfer. The main variable under investigation was the negative BF-WGA and results were corrected for confounders (maternal and paternal age, number of retrieved oocytes, male factor) by multiple logistic regression analysis.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In Group 1, 60 patients transferred negative BF-WGA blastocysts and 42 positive BF-WGA blastocysts, and the LBR at the first transfer was 53.3% and 26.2%, respectively (P = 0.0081). After testing for selected confounders in a multiple logistic analysis, the transfer of blastocysts with negative BF-WGA resulted in an odds ratio of (OR) 3.52 (95% CI: 1.48–8.88, P = 0.0057) compared to transfer of positive BF-WGA blastocysts. In Group 2, at the first transfer 30 deliveries resulted from blastocysts with negative BF-WGA (48.4%) and three from the transfer of positive BF-WGA blastocysts in 26 patients (11.5%; P = 0.0014). Multiple logistic analysis indicated that the transfer of blastocysts with negative BF-WGA resulted in an OR 6.89 (95% CI: 1.98–32.95, P = 0.0056) compared to transfer of positive BF-WGA blastocysts. The LBR per transfer and the cumulative LBR per patient showed the same trend.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study was performed in a single center.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The data from this study highlight the heterogeneity of blastocysts of similar morphology, even in those classified as euploid by TE analysis. Failure to detect DNA in BFs after WGA is associated with a significantly higher LBR at the first embryo transfer as well as per transfer and per patient. The processing of the BF by WGA is an easy and cost-effective tool that could become a valuable option to offer patients the highest chances of term pregnancy in the shortest time possible.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study received no funding from external sources. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.