HeAlth System StrEngThening in four sub_Saharan African countries (ASSET) to achieve high-quality, evidence-informed surgical, maternal and newborn, and primary care: protocol for pre-implementation phase studies
Authors: Seward Nadine , Hanlon Charlotte , Abdulahi Ahmed , Abrams Zulfa , Alem Atalay , Araya Ricardo , Bachmann Max , Bogale Birke , Brima Nataliya , Chibanda Dixon , Curran Robyn , Davis Justine , Deneke Andualem , Fairall Lara , Frissa Souci , Gallagher Jennifer , Gao Wei , Harding Richard , Kartha Muralikrishnan R. , Leather Andrew , Lund Crick , Marx Maggie , Nkhoma Kennedy , Murdoch Jamie , Petersen Inge , Petrus Ruwayda , Sandall Jane , Sheenan Andrew , Tadesse Amezene , Thornicroft Graham , van Rensburg André , Sevdalis Nick , Verhey Ruth , Willot Chris , Prince Martin 
Published: January 2021

Objectives

To achieve universal health coverage, health systems need to be strengthened to support the consistent delivery of high-quality, evidence-informed care at scale. The aim of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Research Unit on HeAlthSystemStrEngThening in Sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET) is to address this need in a four-year programme spanning three healthcare platforms (primary health care for the integrated treatment of chronic conditions in adults, maternal and newborn, surgical care) involving eight work packages. This paper describes the pre-implementation phase research protocols that assess: (1) barriers to accessing care; (2) health system bottlenecks in care process and pathways; (3) quality of care, and; (4) people centredness. Findings from this research are used to engage stakeholders and to inform the selection of a set of health system strengthening interventions (HSSIs) and subsequent methodology for evaluation.

Settings

Publicly funded health systems in rural and urban areas in Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, South Africa, and Zimbabwe.

Population

Stakeholders including patients and their caregivers, community representatives, clinicians, managers, administrators, and policymakers.

Study methodologies and delivery

In each work package, we apply a mixed-methods approach, including: literature reviews; situation analyses; cohort studies; cross-sectional surveys; ethnographic observations; semi-structured interviews, and; focus group discussions. At the end of the pre-implementation phase, findings are fed back to stakeholders in participatory theory of change workshops that are used to select/adapt an initial set of contextually relevant HSSIs. To ensure a theory-informed approach across ASSET, implementation science determinant frameworks are also applied, to help identify any additional contextual barriers and enablers and complementary HSSIs. Outputs from these activities are used to finalise underlying assumptions, potential unintended consequences, process indicators and implementation and clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

ASSET places a strong emphasis of the pre-implementation phase of the programme in order to provide an in-depth and systematic diagnosis of the existing heath system functioning, needs for strengthening and active stakeholder engagement. This approach will inform the design and evaluation of the HSSIs to increase effectiveness across work packages and contexts, to better understand what works, for whom, and how.

Strengths and limitations of this study

The National Health Institute of Research (NIHR) Global Research Unit on Health System Strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET) is a four-year programme (2017-2021) that is closely aligned with the SDG goal of UHC, and the recommendations of the Lancet Commission for High Quality Health Systems.

The aim of ASSET is to develop and evaluate effective and sustainable HSSIs, promoting consistent delivery of high-quality, people-centred care.

The ASSET programme is being conducted in two phases including the diagnostic pre-implementation and piloting/rolling implementation phase.

The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology for the pre-implementation phase, which has the core aim of mapping comprehensive care pathways of a patient’s journey though the health system including the community, different providers), and health facilities, documenting what care is provided at what level of the health system and the associated health system bottlenecks.

At the end of the pre-implementation phase of ASSET, it is hoped the common approach taken across different countries, care platforms and health conditions will facilitate cross platform learning and understanding of how differences in health systems and broader contextual influences shaped the development of the interventions.

The overarching expectation is that by using an in-depth participatory process to engage with the stakeholders and map care pathways to and through the health system, we develop a HSS programme that can be implemented at scale that meets the needs and priorities of the local community.