Abstract P3-06-32: Genetic heterogeneity for Her2 accounts for a significant percentage of breast cancers changing Her2 status following implementation of the 2013 CAP/ASCO HER2 reporting guidelines
Authors: Estrada Monica V , Giltnane Jena M , Wheeler Ferrin C , Yenamandra Ashwini , Abramson Vandana , Mayer Ingrid A , Means Julie , Rexer Brent , Meszoely Ingrid M , Sanders Melinda E 
Published: May 2015

Background: Current evidence indicates that patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-positive Breast Cancer (BC) benefit from HER2-targeted therapies. Accurate determination of HER2 status is critical to ensure that the correct patients are offered targeted treatment while patients with HER2-negative tumors–who are unlikely to benefit from anti-HER2 therapy– are spared from the adverse effects of these costly drugs. Guidelines for performance and reporting of HER2 testing, first published in 2007 by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP), were updated in October 2013. The new reporting criteria are based on a combination of HER2:CEP17 ratio and average HER2 copy number.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed HER2 dual probe FISH test results sequentially performed by the Cytogenetics Laboratory at Vanderbilt University from January to May 2014 since implementation of the updated guidelines. The cases were then rescored using the 2007 guidelines. The clinicopathologic features of cases with a change in Her2 status after scoring with the 2013 guidelines were examined for statistical significance.

Results: If the 266 performed HER2 FISH tests had been scored using the 2007 guidelines the results would have been the following: amplified (n = 44, 16%), equivocal (n = 28, 10%) and not amplified (n = 194, 70%). However, using the 2013 guidelines the cases were actually reported as follows: amplified (n=57, 21%), equivocal (n=22, 8.3%) and not amplified (n=187, 68%). Additionally, 18 cases demonstrated genetic heterogeneity in &gt;25% of cells. The updated guidelines resulted in a change in Her2 status in 12% of tests (32/266; p less than 0.0001); 13 changed from equivocal to amplified, 13 cases changed from not amplified to equivocal and 6 cases changed from equivocal to not amplified. Cases with a change in Her2 status following implementation of the new guidelines were more likely to demonstrate genetic heterogeneity (28% [9/32] vs. 4% [9/234]; p less than 0.0001). Furthermore, hormone receptor (HR)-negative tumors scored as not amplified by the 2007 guidelines were more likely to undergo an upgrade in HER2 status under the 2013 guidelines than HR-positive tumors (26% [11/41] vs. 7% [11/153], p less than 0.0001).

Conclusions: The 2013 reporting criteria, based on a combination of HER2:CEP17 ratio and average HER2 copy number, increase the number of patients eligible for HER2-targeted therapies while decreasing equivocal results. Tumors that demonstrate genetic heterogeneity for Her2 or are HR-negative account for a significant percentage of these newly eligible cases. Correlation with clinical response is required to confirm the proposed improved analytical validity of the updated guidelines. Clinical trials to evaluate the benefit of anti-Her2 therapy in patients with genetic heterogeneity are in the planning phase.

Citation Format: Monica V Estrada, Jena M Giltnane, Ferrin C Wheeler, Ashwini Yenamandra, Vandana Abramson, Ingrid A Mayer, Julie Means, Brent Rexer, Ingrid M Meszoely, Melinda E Sanders. Genetic heterogeneity for Her2 accounts for a significant percentage of breast cancers changing Her2 status following implementation of the 2013 CAP/ASCO HER2 reporting guidelines [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-32.