Fluorescence-Guided Surgery to Detect Microscopic Disease in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Authors: Erdemoglu Evrim , Langstraat Carrie L. , Kumar Amanika , Ostby Stuart A. , Girardo Marlene E. , Giannini Andrea , Butler Kristina A. 
Published: January 2025

Background: The objective in epithelial ovarian cancer is to reach maximal cytoreduction with no visible residual tumor. Tumor detection during cytoreductive surgery depends on visual inspection, palpation, or blind biopsy, methods that lack reliability for identifying microscopic disease. Although the importance of microscopic disease in epithelial ovarian cancer is controversial, it may harbor chemoresistant cells and explain the high recurrence rates. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) is an emerging approach. However, the potential in ovarian cancer remains underexplored; the majority of the existing evidence pertains to gastrointestinal tumors and a limited group of ovarian cancer patients. Their comparative effectiveness is still uncertain. Objective: To systematically review and evaluate the role of fluorescence-guided surgical techniques in detecting microscopic disease in ovarian cancer and compare their efficacy to total peritonectomy. Data Sources: A systematic search was made in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase). The search was conducted from 1975 to 2024, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and conference abstracts in the last 25 years. Study Selection: Clinical studies published in English involving ovarian cancer patients undergoing FGS or total peritonectomy were included. Case reports, reviews, animal studies, and studies involving mixed cancer populations without ovarian cancer-specific data were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened 631 studies, yielding 12 eligible studies for final analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted and synthesized in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, using random-effects models for independent analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and odds ratios (ORs) were grouped, accompanied by subgroup analyses based on the fluorescence agent employed. For quality assessment, we utilized the NIH quality tool. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): The primary outcome was the rate of change in surgical management due to fluorescence guidance or total peritonectomy. Secondary outcomes comprised lesion-level sensitivity, specificity, and PPV. Safety outcomes included adverse events associated with fluorescence agents. Results: There were 12 studies involving 429 ovarian cancer patients. FGS improved the detection of microscopic disease compared to standard visualization methods, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.77. Folate receptor-targeted agents had high sensitivity (84%) but low specificity (26%). Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) showed superior diagnostic accuracy with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 96%. Total peritonectomy showed no significant advantage over FGS for detecting microscopic disease. The adverse events were mild, with no serious events reported. We observed a high heterogeneity across studies and methodologies. Conclusions and Relevance: Fluorescence-guided surgery utilizing fluorescence tracers demonstrates potential in improving the detection of microscopic disease and may change surgical management in epithelial ovarian cancer, particularly with 5-ALA. Variability in performance and limited data on survival outcomes necessitates additional research. Total peritonectomy does not offer further advantage in the detection of microscopic disease. Future trials should focus on standardizing methodology and evaluating the effects of microscopic disease removal on survival outcomes. Registration: The study was registered to PROSPERO as CRD42024578274.