Nudges and Prompts Increase Engagement in Self-Guided Digital Health Treatment for Depression and Anxiety: Results From a 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)
Authors: van Mierlo Trevor , Rondina Renante , Fournier Rachel 
Published: October 2023

BACKGROUND

Accessible and effective approaches to mental health treatment are important because of common barriers such as cost, stigma, and provider shortage. The effectiveness of self-guided treatment is well established, and its use has intensified because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Engagement remains important as dose-response relationships have been observed. Platforms such as Facebook (Meta Platform, Inc), LinkedIn (Microsoft Corp), and X Corp (formerly known as Twitter, Inc) use principles of behavioral economics to increase engagement. We hypothesized that similar concepts would increase engagement in self-guided digital health.

OBJECTIVE

This 3-arm randomized controlled trial aimed to test whether members of 2 digital self-health courses for anxiety and depression would engage with behavioral nudges and prompts. Our primary hypothesis was that members would click on 2 features: tips and a to-do checklist. Our secondary hypothesis was that members would prefer to engage with directive tips in arm 2 versus social proof and present bias tips in arm 3. Our tertiary hypothesis was that rotating tips and a to-do checklist would increase completion rates. The results of this study will form a baseline for future artificial intelligence–directed research.

METHODS

Overall, 13,224 new members registered between November 2021 and May 2022 for Evolution Health’s self-guided treatment courses for anxiety and depression. The control arm featured a member home page without nudges or prompts. Arm 2 featured a home page with a tip-of-the-day section. Arm 3 featured a home page with a tip-of-the-day section and a to-do checklist. The research protocol for this study was published in <i>JMIR Research Protocols</i> on August 15, 2022.

RESULTS

Arm 3 had significantly younger members (<i>F</i><sub>2,4564</sub>=40.97; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) and significantly more female members (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup><sub>4</sub>=92.2; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) than the other 2 arms. Control arm members (1788/13,224, 13.52%) completed an average of 1.5 course components. Arm 2 members (865/13,224, 6.54%) clicked on 5% of tips and completed an average of 1.8 course components. Arm 3 members (1914/13,224, 14.47%) clicked on 5% of tips, completed 2.7 of 8 to-do checklist items, and completed an average of 2.11 course components. Completion rates in arm 2 were greater than those in arm 1 (<i>z</i> score=3.37; <i>P</i>&lt;.001), and completion rates in arm 3 were greater than those in arm 1 (<i>z</i> score=12.23; <i>P</i>&lt;.001). Engagement in all 8 components in arm 3 was higher than that in arm 2 (<i>z</i> score=1.31; <i>P</i>&lt;.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Members engaged with behavioral nudges and prompts. The results of this study may be important because efficacy is related to increased engagement. Due to its novel approach, the outcomes of this study should be interpreted with caution and used as a guideline for future research in this nascent field.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-10.2196/37231