P-691 Assessment of ovarian vascularity by three-dimensional vaginal power Doppler on day seven of menstrual cycle to predict the number of eggs collected in antagonist cycle
Authors: Fakih C , Mourad Y , Raad G , Akil W , Sfarjlani R , Chedid J , Daou J , Abou layla H , Ali R , Abou Zeid R , Zahwe R , Saad J , El samad S , Fakih F 
Published: June 2022

Study question

Could ovarian vascularity indices on day 2 and 7 of stimulation, measured by 3-dimensional (3D) vaginal power Doppler, predict after controlled ovarian stimulation?

Summary answer

Ovarian vascularity index (VI) on day 7 may be an indicator of poor (&lt;three mature eggs collected) ovarian responses to gonadotropins.

What is known already

Poor and/or hyper ovarian responses to gonadotropins may be related to cycle cancellation during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). In this context, gonadotropin dose is often individualized using patient features that predict ovarian response (such as age, antral follicular count (AFC) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)). In parallel, ovarian vascularity color doppler is a valuable evaluation method to predict the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and the growth/maturity of Graafian follicles. The aim of the present study is to estimate the utility of 3-dimensional vaginal power Doppler and ovarian vascular flow indices in the prediction of the number of mature occytes collected after COS.

Study design, size, duration

A prospective study was conducted on 296 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle at Al Hadi Laboratory and Medical center, Beirut, Lebanon. It was performed between January 2020 and dec 2021. Couples were categorized into poor responders group (3 or less metaphase II (MII) eggs collected) (36.1%), high responders group (16 or more MII eggs collected) group ( 6.7%), and normal responders group (more than 3 and less than 16 MII eggs collected) (57,2%).

Participants/materials, setting, methods

On the second and seventh day of the menstrual cycle, ovarian volume and vascularity parameters (vascularity index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularity flow index (VFI)) were measured using the 3D power Doppler and the Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis. On day 2 , the antral follicle count was evaluated and a blood sample for AMH testing was collected. Women included in the study have undergone COS using GnRH antagonist protocol.

Main results and the role of chance

Mean age was 35,88+/- 6 year , day2 VI and day2 VFI correlates with the number of egg collected (p = 0.014 and 0.045 respectively).

9 parameters were used to predict poor and high ovarian responses (Age, AMH, AFC, day2 VI, day2 FI , day2 VFI , day7 VI, day7 FI and day7 VFI) in a Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve model .

Ovarian day7 FI significantly predicted poor ovarian response to gonadotropins (p = 0.038) with an area under the curve of 0.679. AFC predicted also poor ovarian response to gonadotropins (p = 0.006) . In parallel, AFC significantly predicted high ovarian response to gonadotropins (p = 0.002) and AUC (0.778) while all other 3D doppler parameters couldn’t predict high responders.

Limitations, reasons for caution

It will be necessary to perform a prospective analysis on a broad sample size to validate these findings. In addition, it will be interesting to assess the impact of ovarian vascularity on pregnancy outcomes.

Wider implications of the findings

Assessing ovarian vascularity during ovarian stimulation can help reduce the rate of cycle cancellation. In addition, more studies are welcomed in the field to unravel the mechanisms behind altered ovarian vascularity and to test the possibility of restoring normal ovarian physiology.

Trial registration number

Not Applicable