Gender disparities in the treatment of aortic stenosis – an analysis of the united states national inpatient sample (2009–2018)
Authors: Erinne I , Bhasin V , Parikh N , Hiltner E , Chen C , Russo M J , Kassotis J , Sethi A 
Published: October 2021

Introduction

Gender disparity in the management of a variety of cardiovascular disorders has been well established. Studies have shown that women are less likely to undergo surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), and have higher mortality and health care cost in the management of aortic stenosis (AS). The impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on this gender disparity has not been well established.

Purpose

We sought to examine the impact of gender on outcomes following aortic valve replacement for AS in the era of routine transcatheter valve replacement.

Methods

We used the National Inpatient Sample (2009–18), a representative probability sample of the United States, to study visits for all aortic valve replacements and in-hospital outcomes as a function of gender. Survey estimation commands were used to provide national estimates.

Results

There were an estimated 431,344 SAVR and 189,137 TAVR inpatient visits during the periods of 2009–18 and 2011–18, respectively with a higher representation of women in the TAVR cohort (46.4% [95% CI, 45.9%-46.9%]) than SAVR (36.8% [95% CI, 36.4%-37.2%]). Women were slightly older with higher prevalence of uncomplicated hypertension (HTN) and pulmonary circulation disorders. However, women exhibited a lower prevalence of complicated HTN, complicated diabetes mellitus, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, peripheral vascular disease and renal failure. In-hospital mortality was higher in women after SAVR (3.8%±0.1 vs 2.7%±0.07, p&lt;0.001) and TAVR (2.4%±0.1 vs 1.7%±0.1, p&lt;0.001) compared to men. Female SAVR patients had higher rates of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, stroke and significant bleeding (5.9%±0.1 vs 5%±0.1, 2.8%±0.1 vs 2.3%±0.07, and 37.8%±0.8 vs 29.8%±0.6; p&lt;0.001, respectively) but lower rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) (16.4%±0.3 vs 20.3%±0.3, p&lt;0.001). In addition, women undergoing TAVR had higher rates of stroke and significant bleeding (2.4%±0.1 vs 1.6%±0.09 and 28.7%±0.6 vs 22%±0.5; p&lt;0.001 respectively) but lower rates of PPM and AKI (9.5%±0.3 vs 10.7%±0.2 and 11.3%±0.3 vs 13.4%±0.3; p&lt;0.001, respectively). There was a reduction in mortality, compared to the early TAVR era, for all groups during the study period, particularly in female TAVR patients (from approximately 5.2% to 1.7%). In-hospital mortality for women was lower after TAVR than SAVR, both after multivariable adjustment (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.24–0.45) and propensity matching (mean difference 1.28%±0.49).

Conclusions

TAVR appears to have narrowed the gender disparity in the management of AS. Although women continue to have a higher in-hospital mortality following both TAVR and SAVR compared to men, TAVR is associated with a lower inpatient mortality in women compared to SAVR. Thus, TAVR may represent a bridge for the gender gap in aortic valve replacement.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.