Abstract P3-08-04: Survivorship care involving a nurse-led survivorship consultation, community support and shared care with primary practitioners
Authors: Mann GB , Pitcher M , Shanahan K , Storer L , Rio I , Bell B , Hookey S , Hickey M , Kennedy L , Curwen-Walker R , Vij S , Park A , Bell C 
Published: August 2014

Background

Survivorship care (SC) has gained prominence as the number of patients disease free after breast cancer treatment increases, the specific needs of those patients become recognised, and funding to meet these demands is constrained. Involvement of Primary Care Practitioners in SC is seen as a solution, but models of Shared Care have met varying degrees of success. We report on a model that involves Specialist centres, Primary Care Practitioners and organisations, and a community based patient support organisation.

Patients and Methods

A consortium comprising two hospital based breast services – the Royal Melbourne/Royal Women's and Western Hospitals – a regional consortium of Primary Care Physicians, and BreaCan, a non-government peer support organisation for women diagnosed with breast cancer, collaborated to obtain and implement a government-supported Survivorship Care Program. Patients completing definitive treatment for early breast cancer were invited to a Nurse-led consultation where the disease, its pathology, treatment and follow-up were reviewed. Psychosocial and other issues were explored and a personalised SC plan was devised and agreed upon. This plan included Shared Care with the Primary Care Practitioner in the majority of cases. Unmet needs were identified and addressed. The SC plan was signed off by a senior breast cancer clinician and forwarded to the primary care physician for ratification. Evaluation included satisfaction surveys and interviews with patients and primary care physicians. Intensity of use of hospital based services was calculated and compared to a previous cohort of early breast cancer patients.

Results

282 patients completing definitive treatment were offered Nurse-led survivorship consultation. 29 declined, and 28 cancelled. At 31 May 2013, 148 care plans were completed, 38 were in preparation and 39 appointments were booked. Response to this initiative from hospital based specialists was positive. All believed that this program would reduce the amount of routine consultations and increase capacity for new or returning patients requiring specialist care. Primary care doctors overwhelmingly believed the survivorship care plan contained information needed to allow them to manage breast cancer survivors, and gave them confidence to take on this role, although there was some uncertainty regarding role delineation between Primary Care and hospital. Patient evaluation of the Nurse-led clinics was strongly positive. All reported finding out something during the consultation, and 94% said they considered the hospital and GP to be partners in their on-going follow-up care. Modelling suggests that about 5 fewer hospital appointments will be required for each patient managed under this program compared to routine hospital-based care.

Conclusions

Hospital based specialists embrace Survivorship care including shared care and patients expect it, while Primary physicians will participate if offered education, support and specific direction. A model including an end-of –treatment consultation and Shared care with Primary Practitioners appears to address many of the requirements for a successful Survivorship program.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-08-04.