Reference Intervals of Mass Coefficients and Absolute Weights of Mini Pigs’ Organs
Authors: Simonova E. V. , Savvateikina A. I. , Sultanova K. T. , Makarova M. N. , Mazukina E. V. 
Published: July 2024

Introduction. Measurement of weights and calculation of mass coefficients of the laboratory animals’ internal organs are the integral stages of toxicological research. However, the absence of the correct intra-laboratory reference intervals corresponding to the normal values established for the animal population of a research laboratory could hinder the analysis of the mass coefficient changes in the experiment. For example, the data on weights and mass coefficients of mini pigs’ organs is being an issue due to its insufficient availability in the open sources. At the same time, in the literature there is a lot of such kind of data referring to the industrial pig breeds. Due to the wide use of the mini pigs in the pre-clinical research and because in the pig species taxonomy they are considered to be a weight category representing the pigs with reduced mass of the body with similar morphology of the organs and body systems, we have set an objective to determine and calculate the reference intervals of mass coefficients of internal organs relative to the mass of the body and brain, as well as the absolute weights of mini pigs’ internal organs and compare the results with the data on mini and industrial pig breeds in the literature sources.

Materials and Methods. The data on 29 males and 29 females of the Vietnamese lop-bellied mini pig breed aged 6 months and older, who used to be in control groups of the various experiments held at JSC “SPA “House of Pharmacy” (Leningrad region) in the period from January 2018 to March 2024, was used to calculate the reference intervals. The statistical analysis was peRussian Federationormed using Microsoft Excel and Reference Value Advisor v2.1 software in compliance with the CLSI guidelines. Calculation of the reference intervals for all parameters was carried out by a robust method, the compliance with the normal distribution law was determined by Anderson–Darling test, in case of abnormal distribution of data, calculation of the reference interval was carried out with the Box–Cox transformation.

Results. The data on the absolute weights of organs and their coefficients relative to the body and brain masses were presented in the form of the lower and upper reference limits and confidence intervals for each of the limit. The reference intervals of masses of organs across all parameters in males and females had similar limits, the most comparable values were found for the heart and brain parameters. The calculated interval of the heart absolute weight in males was 28.3–253 g, that of the brain was 46.5–93.7 g; in females these intervals were 42.9–279 g and 55.5–81.8 g respectively. Upon comparing the obtained data with the literature sources, it was found that the majority of the absolute weights of all measured mini pigs’ organs had fitted in the limits of the reference values, whereas the masses of the lungs and liver were at the lower limit or below the calculated intervals. The values of the absolute weights of most of the organs of the industrial pig breeds were higher than that of mini pigs, which was due to the difference in the body size and mass of the studied animal breeds. When comparing the mass coefficients of organs in relation to the body mass, it was found that the coefficients of most organs of the industrial breeds and mini pigs, on the contrary, were within the calculated reference intervals or slightly exceeded them.

Discussion and conclusion. The calculated reference intervals of the mass coefficients of some organs in relation to the body mass, as well as the absolute weights of the spleen in mini pigs are comparable with the data available in literature for the industrial meat pig breeds. At the same time, the data available in the literature sources on the absolute weights of organs and their mass coefficients relative to the body mass of mini pigs, in most cases, have fitted into the calculated intervals. To increase the prognostic value of the obtained reference intervals, the analysis of a larger size sample is necessary.