Recent results of stellar occultations by (60558) Echeclus
Authors: Pereira Chrystian Luciano , Braga-Ribas Felipe , Emilio Marcelo , Morgado Bruno Eduardo , Desmars Josselin , Sicardy Bruno , Ortiz Jose Luis , Vieira-Martins Roberto , Branco Hely Cristian , Assafin Marcelo , Camargo Julio I. B. , Gomes-Jr Altair , Rommel Flavia Luane ,   Echeclus team
Published: September 2022

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;Centaurs are small objects of the Solar System with orbits between Jupiter and Neptune (5.2 AU&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;&lt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;q&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;&lt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;30 AU) (Jewitt &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;2009), being an important population due to the presence of cometary activity (about 13% of Centaurs shows cometary &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;activity) (Bauer et al. 2008).&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;However, after the discovery of ring systems orbiting Chariklo (Braga-Ribas et al. 2013) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;and Haumea (Ortiz et al. 2017) and the proposition of a ring around Chiron (Ruprecht et al. 2015; Ortiz et al. 2015), we &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;wonder if these structures are common around the small bodies or if specific conditions are necessary for their formation &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;and maintenance (Sicardy et al. 2020). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;Discovered in March 2000, the active Centaur 174P/Echeclus (60558) has an equivalent diameter estimated in &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;59&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;&amp;#177;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;4 km (Bauer et al. 2013) and 64&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;6&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;&amp;#177;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;6 km (Duffard et al. 2014), and showed cometary activity on different occasions: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;December 2005 (Choi &amp; Weissman 2006), May 2011 (Jaeger et al. 2011), August 2016 (Miles 2016), and December 2017 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;Kareta et al. (2019). To determine the main body&amp;#8217;s size and shape and investigate whether material ejections during the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;outbursts could have fed possible rings or a shell of diffuse material around Echeclus, we predicted and observed stellar &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;occultations by this Centaur in 2019, 2020, and 2021. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;Stellar occultations by Echeclus were predicted using the Gaia DR2 catalog and NIMA ephemeris (Desmars et al. 2015). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;The prediction map of the 2019 October 29 event put the shadow&amp;#8217;s path over South America, but all the telescopes that &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;participated in this campaign missed the occultation path, providing five negative chords. The 2020 January 22 event is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;also predicted to pass over South America, resulting in two positive and four negative chords.&lt;/span&gt; Finally, we predicted t&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;he last event&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt; over Japan in 2021 January 19, resulting in one positive and ten negative chords.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;With the positive detections of 2020, we fit an ellipse with an equivalent diameter of 59 &amp;#177; 4 km to the edges of the chords. The resulting ellipse has a semi-major axis a&amp;#8217; = 36 km and oblateness &amp;#949;&amp;#8242; = 0.325. From the rotational light curves (Rousselot et al., 2021), we note that 2020 stellar occultation occurs near the maximum absolute brightness. Thus, the surface seen during the occultation event was close to the maximum possible. So we were able to compare the ellipse fitted to the chords to the 3D model and pole orientations proposed by (Rousselot et al. 2021). By propagating the Echeclus rotation, we compare the 3D model to the 2021 stellar occultation, where we rule out some of the proposed pole solutions due to the close negative chord. We also fitted the 3D model to the chords, obtaining the triaxial dimensions of Echeclus as a &amp;#215; b &amp;#215; c = 36.5 &amp;#215; 28.0 &amp;#215; 24.5 km, resulting in an area-equivalent diameter of D&lt;sub&gt;equiv&lt;/sub&gt; = 61.8 &amp;#177; 0.6 km, which is in agreement with the area-equivalent diameters presented in the literature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;We used all three event data sets to look for sudden drops in flux (evidence of confined material) or shallow and extensive drops (evidence of coma). The best light curves in terms of spatial resolution and SNR were: La Silla/NTT in 2019, which covered about 7,000 km in the sky plane; SOAR in 2020, covering 14,000 km in the sky plane and Okazaki/Japan in 2021, which covered about 9,000 km in the sky plane. With these light curves, we determined lower limits for detection for apparent opacity at the 3&amp;#963; level as 0.145, 0.189, and 0.258, respectively. In addition, limits for the equivalent width were also determined for these three data sets, with values of 0.19 km for La Silla/NTT, 0.36 km for SOAR, and 0.18 km for Okazaki.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;&lt;br role=&quot;presentation&quot; /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Acknowledgments&lt;/strong&gt;: C.L.P. is thankful for the support of the CAPES scholarship. The following authors acknowledge the respective CNPq grants: F.B-R 309578/2017-5; J.I.B.C. 308150/2016-3 and 305917/2019-6; F.L.R. CAPES scholarship. This study was financed in part by the Coordena&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o de Aperfei&amp;#231;oamento de Pessoal de N&amp;#237;vel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001 and the National Institute of Science and Technology of the e-Universe project (INCT do e-Universo, CNPq grant 465376/2014-2). ARGJr acknowledges FAPESP grant 2018/11239-8.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;References&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;ltr&quot; role=&quot;presentation&quot;&gt;Bauer, J. M., Choi, Y.-J., Weissman, P. R., et al. 2008, PASP, 120, 393&lt;br /&gt;Bauer, J. M., Grav, T., Blauvelt, E., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 773, 22&lt;br /&gt;Braga-Ribas, F., Sicardy, B., Ortiz, J. L., et al. 2013, ApJ, 773, 26&lt;br /&gt;Choi, Y.-J. &amp; Weissman, P. 2006, in AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 38, 37.05&lt;br /&gt;Desmars, J., Camargo, J. I. B., Braga-Ribas, F., et al. 2015, A&amp;A, 584, A96&lt;br /&gt;Duffard, R., Pinilla-Alonso, N., Santos-Sanz, P., et al. 2014, A&amp;A, 564, A92&lt;br /&gt;Jaeger, M., Prosperi, E., Vollmann, W., et al. 2011, IAU Circ., 9213, 2&lt;br /&gt;Jewitt, D. 2009, AJ, 137, 4296&lt;br /&gt;Kareta, T., Sharkey, B., Noonan, J., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 255&lt;br /&gt;Miles, R. 2016, CBET, 4313&lt;br /&gt;Ortiz, J. L., Duffard, R., Pinilla-Alonso, N., et al. 2015, A&amp;A, 576, A18&lt;br /&gt;Ortiz, J. L., Santos-Sanz, P., Sicardy, B., et al. 2017, Nature, 550, 219&lt;br /&gt;Rousselot, P., Kryszczy&amp;#324;ska, A., Bartczak, P., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 3444&lt;br /&gt;Ruprecht, J. D., Bosh, A. S., Person, M. J., et al. 2015, Icarus, 252, 271&lt;br /&gt;Sicardy, B., Renner, S., Leiva, R., et al. 2020, The Trans-Neptunian Solar System, 249&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;