Abstract A040: Effects of food environment, income inequality, and racial segregation on obesity- related cancer mortality
Authors: Davis Elizabeth S. , Myers Sara , Franks Jeffrey A. , Poulson Michael R. , Palmer Julie R. , Kenzik Kelly M. 
Published: September 2024

BACKGROUND: Rural areas experience 7-12% higher risk of obesity-related cancer mortality compared to their urban counterparts. Complex interactions between social and structural factors in rural areas, combined with limited access to healthy foods and lower income, warrant further study to understand drivers of this disparity. Methods: County-level rates of age-adjusted obesity-related cancer mortality per 100,000 (2009-2020 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Wide-Ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research database. Based on data from the Food Environment Atlas, we calculated food swamp using the modified Retail Food Environment Index (mRFEI) as the ratio of fast-food restaurants and convenience stores to grocery and specialized food stores, supercenters, and farmers markets. Food swamp scores were then divided into quartiles. Next, we used Global G and local Gi statistics to identify the presence of spatial autocorrelation in food swamp and subsequently calculated a spatial moving average (SMA) across counties. Measures of economic segregation, racial segregation, and racialized economic segregation were calculated using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) using population and demographic estimates from the 2005- 2009 American Community Survey. Larger values reflect concentrated extremes of disadvantage. Poisson regression was used to assess the impact of food swamp, urban-rural status, economic segregation, racial segregation, and racialized economic segregation on rates of obesity-related cancer mortality. Results: Among the 3014 counties included, median food swamp score was 3.6 (interquartile range=2.6-4.9), and counties in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles for food swamp had 2%, 4%, and 6% higher rates (respectively) of obesity-related cancer mortality than those in the 1st quartile. Incidence rate ratios for the association of food swamp quartile with obesity-related cancer mortality were 1-3% smaller after control for food swamp SMA and for racialized economic Urban-rural differences in obesity-related cancer mortality varied with all ICE measures. Rural counties had 5% higher rates of obesity-related cancer mortality (IRR=1.05, 95%CI=1.04-1.06), even after controlling for food swamp and food swamp SMA, but there was no longer an association after controlling for economic segregation (IRR=0.99, 95%CI=0.98-1.00). Rural counties had 5% higher rates of obesity-related cancer mortality (IRR=1.05, 95%CI=1.04-1.07) when controlling for racial segregation and 2% higher rates when controlling for racialized economic segregation (IRR=1.02, 95%CI=1.01-1.03). Thus, we stratified our models by urban-rural status and found that each ICE measure had larger effects on obesity-related cancer mortality in rural counties than in urban. CONCLUSION: While food swamp is important, the socioeconomic environment of a county has a larger impact on obesity- related cancer mortality. Individuals may have access to healthy food stores, but whether they can afford the healthy food is more important.

Citation Format: Elizabeth S. Davis, Sara Myers, Jeffrey A. Franks, Michael R. Poulson, Julie R. Palmer, Kelly M. Kenzik. Effects of food environment, income inequality, and racial segregation on obesity- related cancer mortality [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A040.