Improving Cognitive Empathy Through Traumatic Brain Injury Experiential Learning: A Novel Mixed Methods Approach for Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Education
Authors: Hardin Kathryn , Rossi-Katz Jessica , Busch Scott 
Published: January 2025

Purpose:

The aim of this study was to gauge the impacts of cognitive empathy training experiential learning on traumatic brain injury (TBI) knowledge, awareness, confidence, and empathy in a pilot study of speech-language pathology graduate students.

Method:

A descriptive quasi-experimental convergent parallel mixed methods design intervention pilot study (QUAL + QUANT) was conducted with a diverse convenience sample of 19 first- and second-year speech-language pathology graduate students who engaged in a half-day TBI point-of-view simulation. The simulation was co-constructed through a participatory design with those living with TBI based on Kolb's experiential learning model and followed the recommendations for point-of-view simulation ethics. After setting goals, participants engaged in four station activities completing cognitive communication activities of daily living, while experiencing manipulations to their sensory systems. Activities included reading while wearing goggles with blurred or double vision, listening with tinnitus and auditory processing disorder, and taking notes during a manipulated college lecture. Participants also interacted with an individual living with TBI and responded to targeted prompts throughout the day. Quantitative outcomes were measured using published TBI knowledge and empathy scales and analyzed with descriptive, parametric and nonparametric statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Data were then triangulated through mixed methods. Mixed methods design quality was ensured by following the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (
Hong et al., 2018
).

Results:

After experiential learning, significant increases in speech-language pathologist (SLP) TBI knowledge, empathy, and awareness of TBI symptom and symptom impacts were found. Many, but not all, participants also reported changes in clinical confidence.

Conclusions:

Cognitive empathy training using experiential learning appears to be a viable method to increase SLP knowledge, empathy, and symptom awareness for TBI clinical care. Future research should replicate the study with different types and locations of speech-language pathology graduate programs to consider TBI empathy training as a standard training method to improve both individual and provider outcomes.

Plain Language Summary:

Individuals and families living with traumatic brain injury (TBI) say their providers lack necessary knowledge; do not seem to understand what living with TBI is like; and can be dismissive, uncaring, and lacking empathy. Health care providers do not automatically imagine the world from the patient's perspectives, to “walk in another's shoes”; it takes intentional effort and training. This project attempted to train those specific empathy skills for speech-language pathology graduate students through experiential learning. Experiential learning is a process where people engage in meaningful activities and spend lots of time reflecting on their experiences. Working with people living with TBI, we built a half-day workshop where 19 graduate students completed normal daily activities (such as texting, reading) through different stations that provided insights into what it may be like to have a TBI, such as wearing goggles to induce blurred or double vision, having ringing in their ears (tinnitus), and watching an overwhelming manipulated college video lecture. Afterward, participants listened to a person living with TBI and asked questions. This was important because engaging in activities without interacting with someone living with TBI misses a key idea about listening to and learning from individuals and families. We measured TBI knowledge, empathy, and confidence by looking at surveys pre- and posttraining and reading students' written reflections. Participants reported significant changes in how they think about brain injury and how they will provide clinical care for people living with TBI in the future.

Supplemental Material:

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28098254