Tertiary Surfactant Flooding: Petroleum Sulfonate Composition-Efficacy Studies
Authors: Gale Walter W. , Sandvik Erik I. 
Published: December 2007

This paper discusses results of a laboratory program undertaken to define optimum petroleum program undertaken to define optimum petroleum sulfonates for use in surfactant flooding. Many refinery feedstocks, varying in molecular weight and aromatic content, were sulfonated using different processes, Resulting sulfonates were evaluated by measuring interracial tensions, adsorption-fractionation behavior, brine compatibility, and oil recovery characteristics, as well as by estimating potential manufacturing costs. The best combination o[ these properties is achieved when highly aromatic feedstocks are sulfonated to yield surfactants having very broad equivalent weight distributions. Components of the high end of the equivalent weight distribution make an essential contribution to interfacial tension depression. This portion is also strongly adsorbed on mineral surfaces and has low water solubility. Middle Portions of the equivalent weight distribution serve as sacrificial adsorbates while lower equivalent weight components Junction as micellar solubilizers for heavy constituents. Results from linear laboratory oil-recovery tests demonstrate interactions of various portions of the equivalent weight distribution. portions of the equivalent weight distribution

Introduction

Four major criteria used in selecting a surfactant for a tertiary oil-recovery process are:

- low oil-water interfacial tension,

- low adsorption,

- compatibility with reservoir fluids and

- low cost.

Low interfacial tension reduces capillary forces trapping residual oil in porous media allowing the oil to be recovered. Attraction of surfactant to oil-water interfaces permits reduction of interfacial tension; however, attraction to rock-water interfaces can result in loss of surfactant to rock surfaces by adsorption. Surfactant losses can also arise from precipitation due to incompatibility with reservoir fluids. Low adsorption and low cost are primarily economic considerations, whereas low interfacial tension and compatibility are necessary for workability of the process itself. Petroleum sulfonates useful in surfactant flooding have been disclosed in several patents; however, virtually no detailed information is available in the nonpatent technical literature. Laboratory evaluation of surfactants consisted of determining their adsorption, interfacial tension, and oil recovery properties. Adsorption measurements were made by static equilibration of surfactant solutions with crushed rock and clays and by flowing surfactant solutions through various types of cores. Interfacial tensions were measured using pendant drop and capillary rise techniques. Berea, pendant drop and capillary rise techniques. Berea, Bartlesville, and in some cases, field cores containing brine and residual oil were flooded with sulfonate solutions in order to determine oil recovery. Fluids used in these displacement tests are described in Table 1. Unless otherwise specified, displacements of Borregos crude oil were carried out with Catahoula water as the resident aqueous phase after waterflooding and displacements of phase after waterflooding and displacements of Loudon crude oil with 1.5 percent NaCl as the resident aqueous phase. In those examples where banks of surfactants were injected, drive water following the surfactant had the same composition as the resident water. Concentrations of sulfonates are reported on a 100-percent activity basis.