Qualitative and quantitative efficacy assessment of CT-imaging of liver lesions using Imeron 400 vs. Imeron 300 in a randomised blinded study
Authors:   , Zantiotou-Roth Evangelia 
Published: August 2024

Background: In the Computer Tomography imaging, examinations for the diagnosis of lesions of the upper abdomen currently use water-soluble, iodinated, non-ionic contrast agents with low molecular weight. One possibility to reduce the time of the examination and X-ray exposure is to increase the injection rate. However, higher injections rates lead to increased hypersensitivity reactions and extravasation rates. Furthermore, cardiac pump function does not always allow for the transportation of such a large volume within one heartbeat. With a contrast agent of higher iodine concentration, the injection rate may be reduced without decreasing the iodine delivery rate while reducing the volume load of the heart. Aim: to compare the performance and image quality of two injection protocols of contrast medium for multiphasic CT imaging of malignant hepatic lesions; one using Imeron 300 at an injection rate of 5 ml/ sec and the second using Imeron 400 at an injection rate of 3,7 ml/ sec, for multiphasic CT imaging of malignant hepatic lesions, in order to optimise the iodine concentration and injection rate of the contrast agent Imeron in the Multislice Spiral-CT of the upper abdomen. Materials and methods: the current prospective, single centre, double-blinded, randomised and interindividual comparison study included 50 patients (29 males and 21 females) with a mean age of 63,3 years. Patients were randomised to one of the two injection protocols. Image evaluation included qualitative assessment (technical quality, presence of artefacts and overall contrast quality) and quantitative assessment (measuring the difference in HU between the lesion and the surrounding hepatic tissue). The difference between both protocols was tested for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and the Two-Sample t-test. Results: there was no statistically significant difference between both protocols regarding the technical quality of images, both in the AP (p = 0,46) and in the venous phase (p = 0,48). Additionally, no statistically significant difference was found regarding the presence of artefacts related to the contrast medium, both in the AP (p = 0,46) and in the venous phase (p = 0,46), as well as regarding the overall contrast quality of images both in the AP (p = 0,50) and in the venous phase (p = 0,48). Quantitative assessment showed no statistically significant difference regarding the difference in HU measurement between the hepatic lesion and the surrounding hepatic tissue, both in the AP (p = 0,36) and in the venous phase (p = 0,92). Conclusion: in the multiphasic CT imaging of the liver, reducing the injection rate of the contrast medium Imeron from 5 ml/ sec to 3,7 ml/ sec while increasing the iodine strength of the agent from 300 to 400 mg/ml, respectively, and thus keeping the iodine injection flow rate constant, produces similar signal intensities and results in similar technical, image and overall contrast qualities.. Keywords: Contrast-medium, injection rate, iodine concentration, hepatic malignancy, multiphasic CT