Barriers to and Facilitators of Using Remote Measurement Technology in the Long-Term Monitoring of Individuals With ADHD: Interview Study (Preprint)
Authors: Denyer Hayley , Deng Qigang , Adanijo Abimbola , Asherson Philip , Bilbow Andrea , Folarin Amos , Groom Madeleine J , Hollis Chris , Wykes Til , Dobson Richard JB , Kuntsi Jonna , Simblett Sara 
Published: June 2023

BACKGROUND

Remote measurement technology (RMT) has the potential to address current research and clinical challenges of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and its co-occurring mental health problems. Despite research using RMT already being successfully applied to other populations, adherence and attrition are potential obstacles when applying RMT to a disorder such as ADHD. Hypothetical views and attitudes toward using RMT in a population with ADHD have previously been explored; however, to our knowledge, there is no previous research that has used qualitative methods to understand the barriers to and facilitators of using RMT in individuals with ADHD following participation in a remote monitoring period.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the barriers to and facilitators of using RMT in individuals with ADHD compared with a group of people who did not have a diagnosis of ADHD. We also aimed to explore participants’ views on using RMT for 1 or 2 years in future studies.

METHODS

In total, 20 individuals with ADHD and 20 individuals without ADHD were followed up for 10 weeks using RMT that involved active (questionnaires and cognitive tasks) and passive (smartphone sensors and wearable devices) monitoring; 10 adolescents and adults with ADHD and 12 individuals in a comparison group completed semistructured qualitative interviews at the end of the study period. The interviews focused on potential barriers to and facilitators of using RMT in adults with ADHD. A framework methodology was used to explore the data qualitatively.

RESULTS

Barriers to and facilitators of using RMT were categorized as <i>health-related</i>, <i>user-related,</i> and <i>technology</i>-<i>related</i> factors across both participant groups. When comparing themes that emerged across the participant groups, both individuals with and without ADHD experienced similar barriers and facilitators in using RMT. The participants agreed that RMT can provide useful objective data. However, slight differences between the participant groups were identified as barriers to RMT across all major themes. Individuals with ADHD described the impact that their ADHD symptoms had on participating (<i>health-related</i> theme), commented on the perceived cost of completing the cognitive tasks (<i>user-related</i> theme), and described more technical challenges (<i>technology-related</i> theme) than individuals without ADHD<i>.</i> Hypothetical views on future studies using RMT in individuals with ADHD for 1 or 2 years were positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with ADHD agreed that RMT, which uses repeated measurements with ongoing active and passive monitoring, can provide useful objective data. Although themes overlapped with previous research on barriers to and facilitators of engagement with RMT (eg, depression and epilepsy) and with a comparison group, there are unique considerations for people with ADHD, for example, understanding the impact that ADHD symptoms may have on engaging with RMT. Researchers need to continue working with people with ADHD to develop future RMT studies for longer periods.