Nano-Scale X-Ray Computed Tomography of Micro-Porous Layers
Authors: Andisheh-Tadbir Mehdi , Pokhrel Anish , Singh Yadvinder , White Robin , Hannach Mohamed El , Orfino Frank , Dutta Monica , Kjeang Erik 
Published: February 2020

Recent advances in the development of polymer electrolyte fuel cells have proven that application of a thin micro-porous layer (MPL) on top of the macro-porous fibrous gas diffusion layer (GDL) can significantly enhance the fuel cell performance. Therefore, specific information on the structure of this layer could assist the understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Porosity and pore size distribution (PSD) are the main quantities that reveal important information about the structure. Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) technique has been used previously to characterize the pore phase of the MPL [1]. Focused ion beam integrated with scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) technique is another method of determining the MPL structure, in terms of both solid and pore phases [1,2]. However, these two approaches are generally destructive in nature, and may therefore skew the results by altering the MPL structure either during imaging or during post-processing. In addition, neither method can distinguish between carbon and PTFE inside the MPL [3].

The recent emergence of lab scale micro- and nano-scale X-ray computed tomography facilities provides a new opportunity for obtaining the 3D structure of porous materials by means of a non-destructive approach that can provide high quality images. This approach was used to study the cathode catalyst layer by Nano-scale X-ray computed tomography (NXCT) [4]. The reliability of the approach was assessed by comparing the obtained images by NXCT with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images [4]. To our knowledge, there is only one published investigation with the focus on MPL imaging using NXCT [5]. In [5], an MPL was used as the sample for comparison of NXCT and FIB-SEM imaging capabilities, and some properties were calculated based on the obtained structures.

By increasing the application of NXCT in the field of fuel cell materials, there will be a need for standardized imaging techniques. Hence, the objective of the present work is to develop suitable NXCT imaging, reconstruction, and post-processing protocols for MPLs. For this purpose, commercially available Sigracet SGL 24BC is used as the sample GDL material in this analysis. Two different sample preparation techniques are compared. Furthermore, various algorithms for automatic thresholding of the images are discussed and the most appropriate one for MPL segmentation is recommended. Fig. 1 shows the obtained raw versus segmented image on a cross section of the MPL, for which the porosity is obtained to be 50-52%. Shown in Fig. 2 is also the pore size distribution for the same MPL.MPL thermo-physical properties are also calculated based on the reconstructed images and compared to literature data. Moreover, for the first time, we explore the viability of determining the nanoscale PTFE distribution inside the MPL using the low energy X-ray beam of the Zeiss Xradia 810 Ultra facility. This instrument is considered state-of-the-art for laboratory NXCT and generates a monochromatic X-ray beam with 5.4 keV of energy. The low energy of the X-ray beam provides a good image contrast even for chemical compounds with low effective atomic numbers.

Aknowledgment

Funding for this research was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canada Foundation for Innovation, British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund, and Ballard Power Systems through an Automotive Partnership Canada grant.

References

[1]A. Nanjundappa, A.S. Alavijeh, M. El Hannach, D. Harvey, E. Kjeang, Electrochimica Acta 110 (2013) 349.

[2]H. Ostadi, P. Rama, Y. Liu, R. Chen, X.X. Zhang, K. Jiang, Journal of Membrane Science 351 (2010) 69.

[3]M. El Hannach, R. Singh, N. Djilali, E. Kjeang, Journal of Power Sources 282 (2015) 58.

[4]W.K. Epting, J. Gelb, S. Litster, Advanced Functional Materials 22 (2012) 555.

[5]E. a. Wargo, T. Kotaka, Y. Tabuchi, E.C. Kumbur, Journal of Power Sources 241 (2013) 608.

Figure 1