A method for downstream analysis of gene set enrichment results facilitates the biological interpretation of vaccine efficacy studies
Authors: Tan Yan , Godec Jernej , Wu Felix , Tamayo Pablo , Mesirov Jill P. , Haining W. Nicholas 
Published: April 2016

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) is a widely employed method for analyzing gene expression profiles. The approach uses annotated sets of genes, identifies those that are coordinately up‐ or down-regulated in a biological comparison of interest, and thereby elucidates underlying biological processes relevant to the comparison. As the number of gene sets available in various collections for enrichment analysis has grown, the resulting lists of significant differentially regulated gene sets may also become larger, leading to the need for additional downstream analysis of GSEA results. Here we present a method that allows the rapid identification of a small number of co-regulated groups of genes – “leading edge metagenes” (LEMs) - from high scoring sets in GSEA results. LEM are sub-signatures which are common to multiple gene sets and that “explain” their enrichment specific to the experimental dataset of interest. We show that LEMs contain more refined lists of context-dependent and biologically meaningful genes than the parental gene sets. LEM analysis of the human vaccine response using a large database of immune signatures identified core biological processes induced by five different vaccines in datasets from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Further study of these biological processes over time following vaccination showed that at day 3 post-vaccination, vaccines derived from viruses or viral subunits exhibit patterns of biological processes that are distinct from protein conjugate vaccines; however, by day 7 these differences were less pronounced. This suggests that the immune response to diverse vaccines eventually converge to a common transcriptional response. LEM analysis can significantly reduce the dimensionality of enriched gene sets, improve the identification of core biological processes active in a comparison of interest, and simplify the biological interpretation of GSEA results.

Author Summary

Genome-wide expression profiling is a widely used tool to identify biological mechanisms in a comparison of interest. One analytic method, Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) uses annotated sets of genes and identifies those that are coordinately up‐ or down-regulated in a biological comparison of interest. This approach capitalizes on the fact that alternations in biological processes often cause the coordinated change of a large number of genes. However, as the number of gene sets available in various collections for enrichment analysis has grown, the resulting lists of significant differentially regulated gene sets may also become larger, leading to the need for additional downstream analysis of GSEA results. Here we present a method that allows the identification of a small number of co-regulated groups of genes – “leading edge metagenes” (LEMs) – from high scoring sets in GSEA results. We show that LEMs contain more refined lists of context-dependent biologically meaningful genes than the parental gene sets and demonstrate the utility of this approach in analyzing the transcriptional response to vaccination. LEM analysis can significantly reduce the dimensionality of enriched gene sets, improve the identification of core biological processes active in a comparison of interest, and facilitate the biological interpretation of GSEA results.