Detecting and attributing the causes of biodiversity change: needs, gaps and solutions
Authors: Tekwa Eden , Gonzalez Andrew , Oliver Ruth , Ávila-Thieme M. Isidora 
Published: July 2023

A recent theme issue of *Phil Trans B* addressed the multifaceted problems of tracking biodiversity change to meet emerging international development goals, national economic accounting, and diverse community interests. The results place biodiversity science in the context of policy needs, and provide an updated roadmap for how to acquire, process, and use biodiversity observation data in a changing world. In this seminar, several of the authors will speak about their work.

Theory and application of an improved species richness estimator

Species richness is an essential biodiversity variable indicative of ecosystem states and rates of invasion, speciation and extinction both contemporarily and in fossil records. However, limited sampling effort and spatial aggregation of organisms mean that biodiversity surveys rarely observe every species in the survey area. Here we present a non-parametric, asymptotic and bias-minimized richness estimator, Ω by modelling how spatial abundance characteristics affect observation of species richness. Improved asymptotic estimators are critical when both absolute richness and difference detection are important. We conduct simulation tests and applied Ω to a tree census and a seaweed survey. Ω consistently outperforms other estimators in balancing bias, precision and difference detection accuracy. However, small difference detection is poor with any asymptotic estimator. An R-package, Richness, performs the proposed richness estimations along with other asymptotic estimators and bootstrapped precisions. Our results explain how natural and observer-induced variations affect species observation, how these factors can be used to correct observed richness using the estimator Ω on a variety of data, and why further improvements are critical for biodiversity assessments.

A framework for the detection and attribution of biodiversity change

The causes of biodiversity change are of great scientific interest and central to policy efforts aimed at meeting biodiversity targets. Changes in species diversity and high rates of compositional turnover have been reported worldwide. In many cases, trends in biodiversity are detected, but these trends are rarely causally attributed to possible drivers. A formal framework and guidelines for the detection and attribution of biodiversity change is needed. We propose an inferential framework to guide detection and attribution analyses, which identifies five steps—causal modelling, observation, estimation, detection and attribution—for robust attribution. This workflow provides evidence of biodiversity change in relation to hypothesized impacts of multiple potential drivers and can eliminate putative drivers from contention. The framework encourages a formal and reproducible statement of confidence about the role of drivers after robust methods for trend detection and attribution have been deployed. Confidence in trend attribution requires that data and analyses used in all steps of the framework follow best practices reducing uncertainty at each step. We illustrate these steps with examples. This framework could strengthen the bridge between biodiversity science and policy and support effective actions to halt biodiversity loss and the impacts this has on ecosystems.

Camera trapping expands the view into global biodiversity and its change

Growing threats to biodiversity demand timely, detailed information on species occurrence, diversity and abundance at large scales. Camera traps (CTs), combined with computer vision models, provide an efficient method to survey species of certain taxa with high spatio-temporal resolution. We test the potential of CTs to close biodiversity knowledge gaps by comparing CT records of terrestrial mammals and birds from the recently released Wildlife Insights platform to publicly available occurrences from many observation types in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility. In locations with CTs, we found they sampled a greater number of days (mean = 133 versus 57 days) and documented additional species (mean increase of 1% of expected mammals). For species with CT data, we found CTs provided novel documentation of their ranges (93% of mammals and 48% of birds). Countries with the largest boost in data coverage were in the historically underrepresented southern hemisphere. Although embargoes increase data providers' willingness to share data, they cause a lag in data availability. Our work shows that the continued collection and mobilization of CT data, especially when combined with data sharing that supports attribution and privacy, has the potential to offer a critical lens into biodiversity.

Monitoring the fabric of nature: using allometric trophic network models and observations to assess policy effects on biodiversity

Species diversity underpins all ecosystem services that support life. Despite this recognition and the great advances in detecting biodiversity, exactly how many and which species co-occur and interact, directly or indirectly in any ecosystem is unknown. Biodiversity accounts are incomplete; taxonomically, size, habitat, mobility or rarity biased. In the ocean, the provisioning of fish, invertebrates and algae is a fundamental ecosystem service. This extracted biomass depends on a myriad of microscopic and macroscopic organisms that make up the fabric of nature and which are affected by management actions. Monitoring them all and attributing changes to management policies is daunting. Here we propose that dynamic quantitative models of species interactions can be used to link management policy and compliance with complex ecological networks. This allows managers to qualitatively identify ‘interaction-indicator’ species, which are highly impacted by management policies through propagation of complex ecological interactions. We ground the approach in intertidal kelp harvesting in Chile and fishers' compliance with policies. Results allow us to identify sets of species that respond to management policy and/or compliance, but which are often not included in standardized monitoring. The proposed approach aids in the design of biodiversity programmes that attempt to connect management with biodiversity change.