Alzheimer’s disease genetic risk and changes in brain atrophy and white matter hyperintensities in cognitively unimpaired adults
Authors: Soldan Anja , Wang Jiangxia , Pettigrew Corinne , Davatzikos Christos , Erus Guray , Hohman Timothy J , Dumitrescu Logan , Bilgel Murat , Resnick Susan M , Rivera-Rivera Leonardo A , Langhough Rebecca , Johnson Sterling C , Benzinger Tammie , Morris John C , Laws Simon M , Fripp Jurgen , Masters Colin L , Albert Marilyn S 
Published: August 2024

Reduced brain volumes and more prominent white matter hyperintensities on MRI scans are commonly observed among older adults without cognitive impairment. However, it remains unclear whether rates of change in these measures among cognitively normal adults differ as a function of genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease, including APOE-ɛ4, APOE-ɛ2 and Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk scores (AD-PRS), and whether these relationships are influenced by other variables. This longitudinal study examined the trajectories of regional brain volumes and white matter hyperintensities in relationship to APOE genotypes (N = 1541) and AD-PRS (N = 1093) in a harmonized dataset of middle-aged and older individuals with normal cognition at baseline (mean baseline age = 66 years, SD = 9.6) and an average of 5.3 years of MRI follow-up (max = 24 years). Atrophy on volumetric MRI scans was quantified in three ways: (i) a composite score of regions vulnerable to Alzheimer’s disease (SPARE-AD); (ii) hippocampal volume; and (iii) a composite score of regions indexing advanced non-Alzheimer’s disease-related brain aging (SPARE-BA). Global white matter hyperintensity volumes were derived from fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI. Using linear mixed effects models, there was an APOE-ɛ4 gene-dose effect on atrophy in the SPARE-AD composite and hippocampus, with greatest atrophy among ɛ4/ɛ4 carriers, followed by ɛ4 heterozygouts, and lowest among ɛ3 homozygouts and ɛ2/ɛ2 and ɛ2/ɛ3 carriers, who did not differ from one another. The negative associations of APOE-ɛ4 with atrophy were reduced among those with higher education (P &lt; 0.04) and younger baseline ages (P &lt; 0.03). Higher AD-PRS were also associated with greater atrophy in SPARE-AD (P = 0.035) and the hippocampus (P = 0.014), independent of APOE-ɛ4 status. APOE-ɛ2 status (ɛ2/ɛ2 and ɛ2/ɛ3 combined) was not related to baseline levels or atrophy in SPARE-AD, SPARE-BA or the hippocampus, but was related to greater increases in white matter hyperintensities (P = 0.014). Additionally, there was an APOE-ɛ4 × AD-PRS interaction in relation to white matter hyperintensities (P = 0.038), with greater increases in white matter hyperintensities among APOE-ɛ4 carriers with higher AD-PRS. APOE and AD-PRS associations with MRI measures did not differ by sex. These results suggest that APOE-ɛ4 and AD-PRS independently and additively influence longitudinal declines in brain volumes sensitive to Alzheimer’s disease and synergistically increase white matter hyperintensity accumulation among cognitively normal individuals. Conversely, APOE-ɛ2 primarily influences white matter hyperintensity accumulation, not brain atrophy. Results are consistent with the view that genetic factors for Alzheimer’s disease influence atrophy in a regionally specific manner, likely reflecting preclinical neurodegeneration, and that Alzheimer’s disease risk genes contribute to white matter hyperintensity formation.