The study of mitoxantrone as a potential immunosuppressor in transgenic pig renal xenotransplantation in baboons: comparison with cyclophosphamide
Authors: Ashton‐Chess Joanna , Meurette Guillaume , Karam Georges , Petzold Thomas , Minault David , Naulet Jeanne , Tesson Laurent , Plat Martine , Anegon Ignacio , Soulillou Jean‐Paul , Blancho Gilles 
Published: December 2004

Abstract:  Mounting evidence suggests that delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) of discordant xenografts has a strong humoral component. To explore the possibility of targeting this humoral response more efficiently, we performed a preliminary study in baboons immunized against pig blood cells using the immunosuppressor mitoxantrone (Mx). The results from this study showed that, in comparison with cyclophosphamide (CyP), Mx induced a long‐lasting depletion of circulating B cells within 6 days of its administration and delayed secondary anti‐Gal antibody (Ab) responses to pig blood cell immunizations. Given these results, we next evaluated Mx in an in vivo model of pig to baboon renal xenotransplantation. We performed a series of renal xenotransplantations in baboons using human CD55–CD59 transgenic donor pigs. In the first group of baboons (Mx group; n = 4) Mx was administered 6 days prior to the day of transplantation, the objective being to perform the xenotransplantation in a context where the recipient would have few remaining circulating B cells and thus have an impaired capacity to mount an Ab response to the xenograft. We compared this group to a second group of baboons treated with CyP starting 1 day prior to transplantation (CyP group; n = 2). All baboons receiving Mx or CyP received an additional immunosuppression of cyclosporin A, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. No hyperacute rejection was observed in either group but all xenografts underwent DXR. Mx did not show superiority to CyP in terms of graft survival with a mean survival time of 8 ± 2 days compared with 9 days for both CyP‐treated baboons. Neither CyP nor Mx decreased serum levels of pre‐existing anti‐Gal Abs but levels of these Abs decreased dramatically within 1 day of transplantation, likely reflecting their immediate trapping within the xenograft. Interestingly however, in contrast to CyP, Mx inhibited the return of anti‐Gal immunoglobulin M (IgM) to the circulation, even at the time of rejection. Nevertheless, strong intragraft deposits of IgM, IgG and the activated complement complex C5b‐9 were observed in biopsies at rejection. Furthermore, despite the expected profound depletion of circulating B cells by Mx within 6 days of its administration, biopsies from both groups at rejection displayed a mild B cell infiltrate accompanied by a strong macrophage and intermediate T‐cell infiltration, the latter tending to be more abundant in Mx‐treated animals. Our data show that in this particular model of pig to baboon xenotransplantation and at the dose used, Mx was not superior to CyP in conferring protection against rejection, despite its capacity to profoundly deplete circulating B cells and to inhibit anti‐Gal Ab responses to xenografts. DXR was thus possible without the return of anti‐Gal Abs and may have been mediated by the early fixation of pre‐existing Abs with secondary complement activation. However, although Mx was not more efficient than CyP in controlling DXR, its capacity to deplete B cells and delay Ab recovery may be beneficial in the context of Gal knockout organ transplantation where the induced Ab response is likely to take precedence over the preformed response.