The Reach Profiler (REAPER)
Authors: Patel Minesh , Kim Jeremie S. , Mutlu Onur 
Published: September 2017

Modern DRAM-based systems suffer from significant energy and latency penalties due to conservative DRAM refresh standards. Volatile DRAM cells can retain information across a wide distribution of times ranging from milliseconds to many minutes, but each cell is currently refreshed every 64ms to account for the extreme tail end of the retention time distribution, leading to a high refresh overhead. Due to poor DRAM technology scaling, this problem is expected to get worse in future device generations. Hence, the current approach of refreshing all cells with the worst-case refresh rate must be replaced with a more intelligent design.

Many prior works propose reducing the refresh overhead by extending the default refresh interval to a higher value, which we refer to as the target refresh interval, across parts or all of a DRAM chip. These proposals handle the small set of failing cells that cannot retain data throughout the entire extended refresh interval via retention failure mitigation mechanisms (e.g., error correcting codes or bit-repair mechanisms). This set of failing cells is discovered via retention failure profiling, which is currently a brute-force process that writes a set of known data to DRAM, disables refresh and waits for the duration of the target refresh interval, and then checks for retention failures across the DRAM chip. We show that this brute-force approach is too slow and is detrimental to system execution, especially with frequent online profiling.

This paper presents reach profiling, a new methodology for retention failure profiling based on the key observation that an overwhelming majority of failing DRAM cells at a target refresh interval fail more reliably at both longer refresh intervals and higher temperatures. Using 368 state-of-the-art LPDDR4 DRAM chips from three major vendors, we conduct a thorough experimental characterization of the complex set of tradeoffs inherent in the profiling process. We identify three key metrics to guide design choices for retention failure profiling and mitigation mechanisms: coverage, false positive rate, and runtime. We propose reach profiling, a new retention failure profiling mechanism whose key idea is to profile failing cells at a longer refresh interval and/or higher temperature relative to the target conditions in order to maximize failure coverage while minimizing the false positive rate and profiling runtime. We thoroughly explore the tradeoffs associated with reach profiling and show that there is significant room for improvement in DRAM retention failure profiling beyond the brute-force approach. We show with experimental data that on average, by profiling at 250ms above the target refresh interval, our first implementation of reach profiling (called REAPER) can attain greater than 99% coverage of failing DRAM cells with less than a 50% false positive rate while running 2.5x faster than the brute-force approach. In addition, our end-to-end evaluations show that REAPER enables significant system performance improvement and DRAM power reduction, outperforming the brute-force approach and enabling high-performance operation at longer refresh intervals that were previously unreasonable to employ due to the high associated profiling overhead.