Absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) recovery and risk of viral reactivation in the setting of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
Authors: Chu Mollee Iff , Ashouri Karam , Chennapan Krithika , Ali Amir , Tam Eric Leon , Woan Karrune , Chaudhary Preet , Ladha Abdullah , Yaghmour George 
Published: June 2023

e19065

Background: The impact of early absolute lymphocyte repopulation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant has historically been shown to predict the risk of post-transplant infection, and subsequently, non-relapse mortality (NRM). Previous studies have shown that ALC recovery after allogeneic stem cell transplant is associated with risk of viral reactivation and survival. In this study we aim to investigate the role of ALC recovery in the contemporary era with myeloablative haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HI-HSCT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients at University of Southern California (USC) Norris Cancer Hospital who received myeloablative conditioning haplo-HSCT (Fludarabine with 12 Gy of radiation) from 2014 to 2020. The primary endpoint was correlation between ALC recovery day 21 and risk of viral reactivation including cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and BK virus. ALC recovery cut off was chosen to be 175/uL on day +21 and 500/uL on day +60 based on prior reports. Results: 58 patients were identified as recipients of MAC haploidentical-HSCT. 17 had ALC recovery at day +21. Mean age was 49 years, 31 (53.4%) were males and 27 (46.6%) were females. 41 (70%) patients were Hispanic, 12 (20%) were non-Hispanic White, and the majority had AML (51%). 76% received > 5*106/kg CD34+ cell dose and 78% received CD3 + cell dose < 3*108/kg. Serum CMV, EBV and urine BK virus were detected in 38 (65.5%), 8 (15.7%) and 11 (32.4%) respectively. Clinically significant CMV reactivation (required treatment with antiviral therapy) was detected in 26 (44.8%) patients. Lack of ALC recovery on day +21 did not show correlation with CMV, EBV and BK virus reactivation. Also, the risk of CMV reactivation was not related to day +60 ALC recovery (p-value = 0.469). On univariate analysis, ALC recovery day +21, day +60, and CMV reactivation did not show correlation with overall survival. In multivariate analysis when adjusted for age and pre-transplant CMV status, higher CD 3+ cell dose of > 3*108/kg was associated with reduced risk of CMV reactivation HR = 0.35 (0.15-0.85) p-value = 0.02. Conclusions: Previous studies have established ALC recovery as a predictor of better outcome. This has not been established in patients undertaking myeloablative HI-HSCT. Our study shows that lack of ALC recovery on day +21 does not affect CMV, EBV and BK virus reactivation and risk of CMV reactivation does not correlate with day +60 ALC recovery. Also, ALC recovery and CMV reactivation does not impact overall survival. The use of Letermovir, effective CMV therapies and close viral surveillance in contemporary practice is likely responsible for mitigating poor outcomes with CMV reactivation. Graft composition needs to be studied prospectively, as higher CD3+ cell dose may present an opportunity to reduce CMV reactivation in HI-HSCT.