A Suicide Prevention Digital Technology for Individuals Experiencing an Acute Suicide Crisis in Emergency Departments: Naturalistic Observational Study of Real-World Acceptability, Feasibility, and Safety (Preprint)
Authors: Dimeff Linda A , Koerner Kelly , Heard Kandi , Ruork Allison K , Kelley-Brimer Angela , Witterholt Suzanne T , Lardizabal Mary Beth , Clubb Joseph R , McComish Julie , Waghray Arpan , Dowdy Roger , Asad-Pursley Sara , Ilac Maria , Lawrence Hannah , Zhou Frank , Beadnell Blair 
Published: September 2024

BACKGROUND

Emergency departments (EDs) are the front line in providing suicide care. Expert consensus recommends the delivery of several suicide prevention evidence-based interventions for individuals with acute suicidal ideation in the ED. ED personnel demands and staff shortages compromise delivery and contribute to long wait times and unnecessary hospitalization. Digital technologies can play an important role in helping EDs deliver suicide care without placing further demands on the care team if their use is safe to patients in a routine care context.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of an evidence-based digital technology (Jaspr Health) designed for persons with acute suicidal ideation seeking psychiatric crisis ED services when used as part of routine ED-based suicide care. This study deployed Jaspr Health for real-world use in 2 large health care systems in the United States and aimed to evaluate (1) how and whether Jaspr Health could be safely and effectively used outside the context of a researcher-facilitated clinical trial, and (2) that Jaspr’s use would be associated with improved patient agitation and distress.

METHODS

Under the auspices of a nonsignificant risk device study, ED patients with acute suicidal ideation (N=962) from 2 health care systems representing 10 EDs received access to Jaspr Health as part of their routine suicide care. Primary outcome measures included how many eligible patients were assigned Jaspr Health, which modules were assigned and completed, and finally, the number of adverse events reported by patients or by medical staff. Secondary outcome measures were patient agitation, distress, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

The most frequent modules assigned were Comfort and Skills (98% of users; n=942) and lethal means assessment (90% of patient users; n=870). Patient task completion rates for all modules ranged from 51% to 79%. No adverse events were reported, suggesting that digital technologies can be safely used for people seeking ED-based psychiatric services. Statistically significant (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) reductions in agitation and distress were reported after using the app. Average patient satisfaction ratings by site were 7.81 (SD 2.22) and 7.10 (SD 2.65), with 88.8% (n=325) and 84% (n=90) of patients recommending the app to others.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital technologies such as Jaspr Health may be safely and effectively integrated into existing workflows to help deliver evidence-based suicide care in EDs. These findings hold promise for the use of digital technologies in delivering evidence-based care to other vulnerable populations in complex environments.

CLINICALTRIAL