STUDI KOMPARATIF MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SQUARE DAN THINK PAIR SHARE TERHADAP MOTIVASI DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MAPEL TIK KELAS X SMA N 1 SUKASADA
Authors: Januartini Putu Deli , Agustini Ketut , Sindu I Gede Partha 
Published: March 2017

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui (1) pengaruh signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square dan Think Pair Share terhadap hasil belajar siswa, (2) hasil belajar yang lebih baik antara model pembelajaran Think Pair Square  atau  Think Pair Share, (3) motivasi belajar siswa, (4) respon siswa.Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Post Test Only Control Group Design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas X1 dengan model Think Pair Square, kelas X3 dengan model Think Pair Share dan X5 dengan model Direct Instruction.Data hasil belajar dianalisis melalui uji prasyarat dengan hasil ketiga kelompok berdistribusi normal dan homogen serta uji hipotesis menggunakan Anova Satu Jalur dengan hasil terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Kemudian uji lanjut t-Scheffe dengan hasil terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Dilihat dari rata-rata hasil belajar maka disimpulkan model Think Pair Square lebih baik dengan hasil belajar lebih tinggi. Hasil analisis angket Think Pair Square diketahui respon sangat positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi, Think Pair Share diketahui respon positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi. Kata kunci:  Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, hasil belajar, motivasi belajar, dan respon siswa. AbstractThe purpose of this study were to determine (1) the significant influence of the application of think pair square and think pair share learning model on student’s learning achievement, (2) better learning achievement between think pair square and think pair share learning model, (3) student’s motivation, (4) the student’s responses.The research was a quasi-experimental design experiment with post test only control group design. The population of study was all the students in grade X. The sample were as X1 class with the application of Think Pair Square learning model, X3 class with the application of Think Pair Share learning model, and X5 class with the application of Direct Instruction learning model.The data was collected by cognitive and psychomotor tests. The student’s learning achievement were analyzed by the prerequisite test with the results of the three groups at normal distribution and homogenous, and the hypothesis tested by One Way Anova which means there is a significant effect on the application of think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. Then it was conducted a further test t-Scheffe with the results there are differences in the learning achievement between think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. According to the average result we made a conclusion that Think Pair Square was better learning models with higher student’s learning achievement. The questionnaires results shows that Think Pair Square was very high positiveresponse and very high learning motivation, Think Pair Share was high positive response and very high learning motivation. Keywords :   Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, learning achievement, learning motivation, and student response.