#3036 The influence of first renal graft on second graft rejection and survival: the importance of revisiting histocompatibility and clinical outcomes
Authors: Leal Rita , Martinho António , Venda João , Figueiredo Arnaldo , Sa Helena , Alves Rui 
Published: May 2024

Background and Aims

Kidney retransplantation confers a robust survival benefit over dialysis and recent data has shown similar outcomes to first kidney transplant. The number of HLA mismatches is an important predictor of graft loss and sensitization and the presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) -pre and -post transplant is a major risk factor for rejection and worst outcomes. However, the importance of HLA matching of first graft and the relevance of first donor DSAs on second graft outcomes is less known. Our aim was to identify risk factors to second graft acute rejection and graft loss, related to second and first graft features.

Method

We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study including all patients submitted to a 2nd kidney transplant between January 2008 and December 2021, excluding patients with more than 2 grafts or multi-organ transplant. Clinical and histocompatibility data from the first and second donor and recipient were collected. HLA antibodies were detected by solid phase assays and considered if MFI &gt;2500. For subsequent kidney transplants, repeated mismatches are not allowed and unacceptable antigens are those for which the patient has pre-formed -A, -B and -DR antibodies, with MFI&gt;1000. Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined according to Banff 2017 criteria. Follow-up was 31st December 2023 for functioning grafts or time to graft failure, with a mean time of 92 ± 53 months.

Results

We included 114 patients, 73 (64%) males, mostly Caucasians (96%), with a mean age of 43.9 ± 13 years at 2nd transplant. First kidney transplant was performed before 2010 for 99 patients (87%), with a median first graft survival of 82.5 [12.5-144] months and 19 patients (16.7%) presented primary disfunction due to surgical/vascular complications. After graft loss, 43 patients (37.7%) had their graft removed. For second transplant, 11 (9.6%) patients had a living donor. Induction therapy with thymoglobulin occurred in 94 patients (83%) and maintenance therapy with mycophenolic acid, calcineurin inhibitors and steroids was prescribed in 83 patients (73%). During follow-up, 20 patients (17.5%) presented biopsy proven acute rejection, 13 (65%) T cell mediated and 7 (35%) antibody-mediated, the majority during the first-year post-transplant (N = 17, 85%). The risk factors for second graft rejection are summarized in Table 1.

Patients with a first graft nephrectomy had a higher risk of acute rejection (OR 3.9, 95% CI [1.4-10.9], p &lt; 0.006) and were more susceptible to the development of second donor post-transplant DSA (58% vs 35%, p = 0.02). Death censored second allograft loss occurred in 24 patients (21%) at follow up and acute rejection was an important risk factors (OR 4.3, 95% CI [1.5-12.1], p = 0.004). First-year graft survival was 93% and a survival at follow up was 79%. On survival analysis the presence of second graft DSA was a major risk factor for graft loss, especially class 2 -DQ and -DR. First transplant total mismatch load, especially on class 1 contributed to worst graft survival.

Conclusion

Worst outcomes in first kidney transplant were related with an increased risk of acute rejection in second graft and 1st graft nephrectomy increases the risk of the development of 2nd graft DSA and acute rejection. First transplant mismatch load decreased second graft survival.