Practice patterns to improve pre and post-transplant medication adherence in heart transplant centres: a secondary data analysis of the international BRIGHT study
Authors: Senft Yuliya , Kirsch Monika , Denhaerynck Kris , Dobbels Fabienne , Helmy Remon , Russell Cynthia L , Berben Lut , De Geest Sabina ,   on behalf of the BRIGHT study team, Crespo-Leiro Maria G , Cupples Sandra , De Simone Paolo , Groenewoud Albert , Kugler Christiane , Ohler Linda , Van Cleemput Johan , Poncelet Alain Jean , Sebbag Laurent , Michel Magali , Bernard Andrée , Doesch Andreas , Livi Ugolino , Manfredini Valentina , Brossa-Loidi Vicens , Segovia-Cubero Javier , Almenar-Bonet Luis , Saint-Gerons Carmen Segura , Mohacsi Paul , Horvath Eva , Riotto Cheryl , Parry Gareth , Firouzi Ashi , Kozuszko Stella , Haddad Haissam , Kaan Annemarie , Fisher Grant , Miller Tara , Flattery Maureen , Ludrosky Kristin , Coleman Bernice , Trammell Jacqueline , St Clair Katherine , Kao Andrew , Molina Maria , Canales Karyn Ryan , de Almeida Samira Scalso , Ayoub Andrea Cotait , Barone Fernanda , Harkess Michelle , Maddicks-Law Joanne 
Published: December 2017

Background:

As medication non-adherence is a major risk factor for poor post-transplant outcomes, we explored how adherence is assessed, enhanced and integrated across the transplant continuum.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to study practice patterns regarding pre- and post-transplant medication adherence assessment and interventions in international heart transplant centres.

Methods:

We used data from the Building Research Initiative Group: chronic illness management and adherence in heart transplantation (BRIGHT) study, a cross-sectional study conducted in 36 heart transplant centres in 11 countries. On a 27-item questionnaire, 100 clinicians (range one to five per centre) reported their practice patterns regarding adherence assessment and intervention strategies pre-transplant, immediately post-transplant, less than one year, and one or more year post-transplant. Educational/cognitive, counselling/behavioural and psychosocial/affective strategies were assessed. Clinicians’ responses (intervention present vs. absent; or incongruence in reporting intervention) were aggregated at the centre level.

Results:

The adherence assessment method most commonly used along the transplant continuum was questioning patients (range 75–88.9%). Pre-transplant, all three categories of intervention strategy were applied. Providing reading materials (82.9%) or instructions (68.6%), involving family or support persons in education (91.4%), and establishing partnership (91.4%) were used most frequently. Post-transplant, strategies closely resembled those employed pre-transplant. Training patients (during recovery) and cueing were more often applied during hospitalisation (74.3%). After the first year post-transplant, except for motivational interviewing (25.7–28.6%), the number of strategies decreased.

Conclusions:

Across the transplant continuum, diverse adherence interventions are implemented; however, post-transplant, the frequency of adherence interventions decreases. Therefore, increased investment is necessary in long-term adherence interventions.