Can the Cartilaginous Thickness Determine the Risk of Malignancy in Pelvic Cartilaginous Tumors, and How Accurate is the Preoperative Biopsy of These Tumors?
Authors: Laitinen Minna K. , Parry Michael C. , Morris Guy V. , Kurisunkal Vineet , Stevenson Jonathan D. , Jeys Lee M. 
Published: April 2024

Background

Peripheral osteochondral tumors are common, and the management of tumors presenting in the pelvis is challenging and a controversial topic. Some have suggested that cartilage cap thickness may indicate malignant potential, but this supposition is not well validated.

Questions/purposes

(1) How accurate is preoperative biopsy in determining whether a peripheral cartilage tumor of the pelvis is benign or malignant? (2) Is the thickness of the cartilage cap as determined by MRI associated with the likelihood that a given peripheral cartilage tumor is malignant? (3) What is local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) in peripheral chondrosarcoma of the pelvis and is it associated with surgical margin?

Methods

Between 2005 and 2022, 289 patients had diagnoses of peripheral cartilage tumors of the pelvis (either pedunculated or sessile) and were treated at one tertiary sarcoma center (the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK). These patients were identified retrospectively from a longitudinally maintained institutional database. Those whose tumors were asymptomatic and discovered incidentally and had cartilage caps ≤ 1.5 cm were discharged (95 patients), leaving 194 patients with tumors that were either symptomatic or had cartilage caps > 1.5 cm. Tumors that were asymptomatic and had a cartilage cap > 1.5 cm were followed with MRIs for 2 years and discharged without biopsy if the tumors did not grow or change in appearance (15 patients). Patients with symptomatic tumors that had cartilage caps ≤ 1.5 cm underwent removal without biopsy (63 patients). A total of 82 patients (63 with caps ≤ 1.5 cm and 19 with caps > 1.5 cm, whose treatment deviated from the routine at the time) had their tumors removed without biopsy. This left 97 patients who underwent biopsy before removal of peripheral cartilage tumors of the pelvis, and this was the group we used to answer research question 1. The thickness of the cartilage cap was recorded from MRI and measuring to the nearest millimeter, with measurements taken perpendicular in the plane that best allowed the greatest measurement. Patient survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with 95% confidence intervals as median observation times to estimate MFS, LRFS, and DSS.

Results

Of malignant tumors biopsied, in 49% (40 of 82), the biopsy result was recorded as benign (or was considered uncertain regarding malignancy). A malignant diagnosis was correctly reported in biopsy reports in 51% (42 of 82) of patients, and if biopsy samples with uncertainty regarding malignancy were excluded, the biopsy identified a lesion as being malignant in 84% (42 of 50) of patients. The biopsy results correlated with the final histologic grade as recorded from the resected specimen in only 33% (27 of 82) of patients. Among these 82 patients, 15 biopsies underestimated the final histologic grade. The median cartilage cap thickness for all benign osteochondromas was 0.5 cm (range 0.1 to 4.0 cm), and the median cartilage cap thickness for malignant peripheral chondrosarcomas was 8.0 cm (range 3.0 to 19 cm, difference of medians 7.5 cm; p < 0.01). LRFS was 49% (95% CI 35% to 63%) at 3 years for patients with malignant peripheral tumors with < 1-mm margins, and LRFS was 97% (95% CI 92% to 100%) for patients with malignant peripheral tumors with ≥ 1-mm margins (p < 0.01). DSS was 100% at 3 years for Grade 1 chondrosarcomas, 94% (95% CI 86% to 100%) at 3 years for Grade 2 chondrosarcomas, 73% (95% CI 47% to 99%) at 3 and 5 years for Grade 3 chondrosarcomas, and 20% (95% CI 0% to 55%) at 3 and 5 years for dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas (p < 0.01). DSS was 87% (95% CI 78% to 96%) at 3 years for patients with malignant peripheral tumors with < 1-mm margin, and DSS was 100% at 3 years for patients with malignant peripheral tumors with ≥ 1-mm margins (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

A thin cartilage cap (< 3 cm) is characteristic of benign osteochondroma. The likelihood of a cartilage tumor being malignant increases after the cartilage cap thickness exceeds 3 cm. In our experience, preoperative biopsy results were not reliably associated with the final histologic grade or malignancy, being accurate in only 33% of patients. We therefore recommend observation for 2 years for patients with pelvic osteochondromas in which the cap thickness is < 1.5 cm and there is no associated pain. For patients with tumors in which the cap thickness is 1.5 to 3 cm, we recommend either close observation for 2 years or resection, depending on the treating physician’s decision. We recommend excision in patients whose pelvic osteochondromas show an increase in thickness or pain, preferably before the cartilage cap thickness is 3 cm. We propose that surgical resection of peripheral cartilage tumors in which the cartilage cap exceeds 3 cm (aiming for clear margins) is reasonable without preoperative biopsy; the role of preoperative biopsy is less helpful because radiologic measurement of the cartilage cap thickness appears to be accurately associated with malignancy. Biopsy might be helpful in patients in whom there is diagnostic uncertainty or when confirming the necessity of extensive surgical procedures. Future studies should evaluate other preoperative tumor qualities in differentiating malignant peripheral cartilage tumors from benign tumors.

Level of Evidence

Level III, diagnostic study.