bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025 huggingface dataset:
Identifying symptoms/illnesses and situations that predispose outpatients to use antibiotics in two healthcare systems
Authors: Laytner Lindsey , Grigoryan Larissa , Trautner Barbara , Alquicira Osvaldo , Salinas Juanita , Hansen Michael , Zoorob Roger , Khan Fareed M.
Published: May 2022

Background: Taking antibiotics outside the guidance of a clinician (nonprescription use) is a potential safety issue and runs counter to antibiotic stewardship efforts. We identified the symptoms and illnesses and situations that may predispose patients to take antibiotics, and we compared these findings between patients attending public primary care clinics and private emergency departments. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between January 2020 and March 2021 in 6 primary care clinics and 2 emergency departments in the United States. We queried patients about 5 symptoms and illnesses (Fig. 1) and 14 situations (Fig. 2) to investigate whether these would lead the patients to take antibiotics without a prescription. We used the χ2 test to compare the symptoms and illnesses and situations between the respondents from public and private healthcare systems. We set the P value for significance at <.025. Results: In total, the survey had 564 respondents (median age, 49.7 years; range, 19–92), and 72% were female. Most respondents identified as either Hispanic or Latina/Latino (46.6%) or African American or Black (33%), followed by White (15.8%), and other (4.6%). Most respondents had visited public clinics (72%). The most common insurance status for our respondents included Medicaid or county financial assistance program (56.6%), followed by private insurance or Medicare (36.7%) and self-pay (6.7%). In public primary care clinics, only 23% had private insurance or Medicare compared to 72.9% in private emergency departments. Of those surveyed, 69% agreed that antibiotics would improve the recovery from sinus infections, followed by bronchitis (64%), sore throat (64%), cold/flu (61.4%), and diarrhea (31.5%). The proportions of respondents who believed that antibiotics would improve the recovery from diarrhea (36.2% vs 19.4%; P = .004) and sore throat (59.9% vs 48.4%; P < .001) were significantly higher among public versus private outpatient respondents. We did not find significant differences for cold/flu, sinus infection, or bronchitis between these 2 healthcare systems (Fig. 1). In 11 of the 14 situations, patients in public clinics were more likely to report a likelihood of using nonprescription antibiotics than the patients visiting the private emergency rooms (Fig. 2). Conclusions: Future stewardship interventions should be aware of the symptoms and illnesses and situations that may influence outpatients to take nonprescription antibiotics. Addressing modifiable factors (eg, leftover antibiotics, antibiotics given by friends or family, and antibiotics available without a prescription in stores or markets) may also curtail these unsafe practices and reduce antibiotic resistance.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Evaluation of periprocedure antibiotics and infection-related hospitalizations after transrectal prostate biopsies
Authors: Ryan Tenley , Thomas-Gosain Neena , Eason Jane , Akalu Hanna , Sharif Navila , Bennett Jessica
Published: May 2022

Background: Prostate cancer is the leading cancer diagnosis and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in men. Definitive diagnosis is made by prostate biopsy. This procedure poses a risk of infection and, rarely, sepsis. Studies have found the incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) after biopsy to be 2%–3%, and the rate of infection-related hospitalization (IRH) to be 0.6%–4.1%. An initial review at our facility found the IRH rate to be 3.7%. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of IRH following prostate biopsy in patients at the Memphis VA Medical Center (VAMC) after initial review and education. Methods: All transrectal prostate biopsies performed at the Memphis VAMC from October 2017 through May 2021 were analyzed. Patients were excluded if they had a spinal cord injury or concomitant procedure. The primary outcome was IRH occurring within 30 days of the procedure. Variables collected included risk factors, antibiotic choice and duration, and details of postprocedural infections. Analyses were performed on a per-procedure basis. Results: Overall, 601 procedures were identified; 13 were excluded, for a total of 588 transrectal prostate biopsies on 533 patients. All patients were given antibiotics. Oral antibiotics alone were provided for 306 procedures (52%) for an average duration of 3 days. A combination of both oral and intramuscular antibiotics were provided for 282 (48%) procedures. The most common oral antibiotics used were cefuroxime (538, 91.4%), ciprofloxacin (17, 2.9%), amoxicillin–clavulanate (16, 2.7%), and sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim (12, 2%). Intramuscular antibiotics included ceftriaxone (263, 93.3%) and gentamicin (19, 6.7%). An infectious complication occurred in 29 patients (4.9%): 26 (3.4%) were urogenital and 5 (0.8%) required hospitalization. Of the procedures complicated by a postprocedure infection, 22 (75.9%) received an oral antibiotic alone, 21 (95.4%) of which were cefuroxime, and 7 (24.1%) received both an intramuscular and an oral agent. Conclusions: In our initial review, the most common antibiotics used were fluroquinolones, with an average duration of 3 days periprocedure and an IRH rate of 3.7%. These findings were used to reinforce practices compliant with American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines. This follow-up review reveals that the first-line choice changed from fluroquinolones to cephalosporins, with average duration remaining at 3 days. Although the overall infection rate was 4.9%, the IRH rate decreased from 3.7% to 0.8%.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Central-line associated bloodstream infections secondary to strict anaerobes: Time for A definition change?
Authors: Seidelman Jessica , Lewis Sarah , Kalu Ibukun , Gettler Erin , Advani Sonali , Anderson Deverick , Smith Becky
Published: May 2022

Background: Central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) arise from bacteria migrating from the skin along the catheter, by direct inoculation, or from pathogens that form biofilms on the interior surface of the catheter. However, given the oxygen-poor environments that obligate anaerobes require, these organisms are unlikely to survive long enough on the skin or on the catheter after direct inoculation to be the true cause of a CLABSI. Although some anaerobic CLABSIs may meet the definition for a mucosal-barrier-injury, laboratory-confirmed, bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI), some may be not. We sought to determine the proportion of CLABSIs attributed to obligate anaerobic bacteria, and we sought to determine the pathophysiologic source of these infections. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected CLABSI data at 54 hospitals (academic and community) in the southeastern United States from January 2015 to December 2020. We performed chart reviews on a convenient sample for which medical records were available. We calculated the proportion of CLABSIs due to obligate anaerobes, and we have described a subset of anaerobic CLABSI cases. Results: We identified 60 anaerobic CLABSIs of 2,430 CLABSIs (2.5%). Of the 60 anaerobic CLABSIs, 7 were polymicrobial with nonanaerobic bacteria. The most common species we identified were Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Lactobacillus (Table 1). The proportion of anaerobic CLABSIs per year varied from 1.2% to 3.7% (Fig. 1). Of 60 anaerobic CLABSIs, 29 (48%) occurred in the only quaternary-care academic medical center in the database. In contrast, an average of 0.6 (SD, 0.6) anaerobic CLABSIs occurred in the 53 community hospitals over the 6-year study period. Of these 29 anaerobic CLABSIs, 23 (79%) were clinically consistent with secondary bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to gastrointestinal or genitourinary source, but they lacked appropriate documentation to meet NHSN criteria for secondary BSI or MBI-LCBI based on case reviews by infection prevention physicians. The other 6 anaerobic CLABSIs did not have a clear clinical etiology and did not meet MBI-LCBI criteria. In addition, 27 (93%) of 29 anaerobic CLABSIs occurred in patients who were either solid-organ transplant recipients, were stem-cell transplant recipients, or were receiving chemotherapy. Lastly, 27 (93%) of 29 anaerobic CLABSIs were treated with antibiotics. Conclusions: Anaerobic CLABSIs are uncommon events, but CLABSI may disproportionately affect large, academic hospitals caring for a high proportion of medically complex patients. Additional criteria could be added to the MBI-LCBI to better classify anaerobic BSI.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
COVID-19 vaccine knowledge, beliefs and attitudes among Oregon healthcare provider types
Authors: Stampke Lisa Corley , Osborn Jessica , Guzman-Cottrill Judith
Published: May 2022

Background: During this pandemic, the public has struggled to navigate the abundance of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation, and it is unclear how this misinformation has affected medical providers and their recommendations for patients. We sought to understand differences in COVID-19 vaccine knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes among Oregon healthcare provider types and regions of practice (rural, suburban, urban). Methods: A 36-question survey was constructed using Qualtrics with consultation from a survey methodologist. The survey was reviewed and approved by OHSU IRB and distributed via listserv or social media posting to provider societies in Oregon, including nurse practitioners (NPs), naturopathic doctors (NDs), physician assistants (PAs), doctors of medicine (MDs), doctors of osteopathic medicine (DOs), or practioners with a bachelor of medicine–bachelor of surgery (MBBS), and via the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) immunization practice listserv. The survey accepted responses from July 9 to August 12, 2021. Participants were volunteers and responses were anonymous. Results: We collected 101 responses. Among them, 87 participants completed 100% of survey questions. Survey respondents were predominantly White females aged 41–50 years with an MD, DO, or MBBS. The overall COVID-19 vaccination rate of respondents was 94.6%. The vaccination rate was highest among the 4 NDs and 7 PAs at 100%, followed by 78 MDs, DOs, and MBBSs at 96.2%, and 12 NPs at 75%. Of NP respondents, 67% practiced rurally; 25.6% of MDs, DOs, and MBBSs practiced rurally; and 25% of NDs and 28.6% of PAs practiced rurally. In total, 22% of NPs did not feel comfortable recommending the COVID-19 vaccine to patients, compared to 1% of MDs, DOs, and MBBSs and 0% of NDs or PAs. All provider types had high rates of disagreement with the statement that the COVID-19 pandemic had increased their trust in vaccine safety: 44% of NPs; 29% of PAs; 25% of NDs; and 7% of MDs, DOs, and MBBSs. Among 19 rural providers, 19% indicated mistrust in public health to ensure that vaccines are safe versus 3% in suburban areas and 0% in urban areas. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is prevalent among healthcare providers and may be higher in NPs and those practicing rurally. Unfortunately, the response rate of NPs was low. Future research should focus on these providers to better understand their knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes about COVID-19 vaccines. These results can also inform future targeted vaccine education to healthcare providers during public health crises.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
RNA and viable SARS-CoV-2 contamination of emergency department surfaces and association with patient COVID-19 status and aerosol procedures
Authors: Tanner Windy , Roberts Scott , Barber Douglas , Barbell Elliana , Heimer Robert , Jubanyik Karen , Parwani Vivek , Tanner Jason , Ulrich Andrew , Wade Martina , Wiley Anne , Yolda-Carr Devyn , Martinello Richard
Published: May 2022

Background: Aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) performed on COVID-19–positive patients raise concerns about the dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 via aerosols and droplets. Infectious aerosols and droplets generated by SARS-CoV-2–positive patient AGPs or through direct COVID-19 patient coughing or exhalation could potentially contaminate surfaces, leading to the indirect spread of SARS-CoV-2 via fomites within the emergency department (ED). We sampled surfaces of ED patient rooms occupied by known SARS-CoV-2–positive patients or patients under investigation for COVID-19 and undergoing an AGP to determine the frequency of room contamination with SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Methods: Swabs were collected from 5 room surfaces in the ED following AGPs performed on patients under investigation for COVID-19 or positive for SARS-CoV-2. High- and low-touch surfaces 6 feet (2 m) from the patient (door handle and return vent, respectively) and reusable medical equipment were swabbed. Swabs were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-qPCR; positive samples were cultured in Vero E6 cells. Patient COVID-19 results were confirmed through the electronic medical record. Results: In total, 203 rooms were sampled: 43 SARS-CoV-2–positive patients with an AGP, 44 SARS-CoV-2–positive patients who did not have an AGP, and 116 SARS-CoV-2–negative patients with an AGP, for a total of 1,015 swabs. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected on 36 (3.5%) surfaces from 29 rooms (14.3%) (Table 1). RNA contamination was detected more frequently in rooms occupied by SARS-CoV-2–positive patients who did not have an AGP than rooms occupied by COVID-19 patients (30% vs 14%). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was also detected in rooms occupied by SARS-CoV-2–negative patients undergoing an AGP (9%). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was most frequently detected on air vents (n = 15), bedrails (n = 10), equipment and vital signs monitors (n = 4 each), and door handles (n = 3). One bedrail was positive by culture and confirmed by an RT-qPCR cycle threshold reduction from >40 to 13. Conclusions: We detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA contamination on room surfaces in the ED, regardless of patient AGP or COVID-19 status; however, RNA contamination of room surfaces was most common in rooms occupied by SARS-CoV-2–positive patients who did not have an AGP, which may be attributable to stage of disease and viral shedding. SARS-CoV-2 RNA contamination was also present in rooms where APGs were performed on SARS-CoV-2–negative patients, suggesting carryover from previous patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was found most often on room air-return vents, further emphasizing the importance of aerosols in the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Candidemia before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of risk factors and outcomes in patients with candidemia
Authors: Colburn Nora , Nichols Courtney , Lustberg Mark , Day Shandra , Haden Michael , Liscynesky Christina
Published: May 2022

Background: An increase in candidemia has been observed throughout the world since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with COVID-19 may have different risk factors, clinical presentations, and outcomes compared to patients without COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all inpatients with candidemia at a large, academic medical center from April 30, 2019, to February 19, 2021. The first case of COVID-19 was detected at our institution March 2020 and patients were sorted into pre– versus post–COVID-19 pandemic groups. Data regarding clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes were collected. The rate of candidemia per 10,000 patient days was calculated from January 2013 through February 2021. Results: In total, 202 patients were identified with candidemia: 92 cases were identified before the pandemic and 110 cases were identified after the pandemic began. Moreover, 33 (16.3%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the admission and 169 (83.7%) did not have COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 were significantly more likely to be older (median, 64.5 vs 54.8 years; P = .0006) and to have a higher body mass index (32.8 vs 29.1; P = .03) than patients without COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 were less likely have some of the traditional risk factors (eg, abdominal surgery, total parenteral nutrition, history of injecting drugs) for candidemia compared to patients without COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 were significantly more likely to require ICU care (97.0% vs 67.5%; P < .001) and to require mechanical ventilation (90.9% vs 53.9%; P < .001), and they had higher mortality at 30 days (66.7% vs 31.4%; P < .001). A multivariate logistic regression model showed that COVID-19 (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.09–5.90) and higher age (OR 1.45, 95% CI, 1.11–1.91) were significant predictors of 30 day mortality. Using a Poisson regression model, the incidence rate ratio for candidemia per month after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic was 2.09 (95% CI, 1.85–2.36; P < .0001) compared to the years prior. Conclusions: Rates of candidemia significantly increased after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with candidemia in the post–COVID-19 era tend to have nontraditional risk factors, to be more critically ill, and to have increased mortality compared to patients in the pre–COVID-19 era. COVID-19 and higher age were independent predictors of mortality. More studies are needed to further define risk factors for candidemia in patients with COVID-19.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Diversity and persistence of MRSA and VRE in nursing homes: Environmental screening and whole-genome sequencing
Authors: Cassone Marco , Wang Joyce , Lansing Bonnie , Mantey Julia , Gibson Kristen , Gontjes Kyle , Mody Lona
Published: May 2022

Background: Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) is of special concern among frail patients in nursing homes. To understand environmental contamination patterns in this setting, we screened a suitable section of a nursing home over time and assessed MRSA and VRE prevalence in patients and their rooms. We were especially interested in assessing whether MRSA and VRE strains persist in rooms during changes of occupancy after patient discharge. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of MRSA and VRE colonization and contamination among successive patients in a cluster of 9 single-occupancy rooms. Using flocked swabs, 5 high-touch surfaces were screened 3 times a week for 34 weeks. Patients were also screened (ie, nares, groin, and hands), if they agreed to participate. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 67 nonredundant MRSA and VRE strains. Single-nucleotide polymorphism heatmaps and similarity trees were generated to evaluate strain diversity and persistence the facility. Results: Overall, 146 distinct occupancy events were captured during the study (16.5 average per room; range, 11–22), with 387 study visits and 4,670 total swabs collected. All rooms were contaminated with VRE, and 8 of 9 were contaminated with MRSA at least once during the study period. New contamination of a room with MRSA or VRE was observed in 43 (23%) of 185 opportunities, with potential persistence during occupancy changes in 25 (32.9%) of 76 opportunities. Sequencing of 67 nonredundant isolates identified at least 6 enterococcal clades and 10 MRSA clades (6 USA100 and 4 USA300), indicating a high degree of diversity and probably multiple introductions in the facility during the study time. In 3 separate cases, whole-genome sequencing confirmed persistence of a specific MRSA strain during a change of room occupancy, including 1 case of a MRSA strain persisting in a clean room before admission of the next patient. For VRE, 2 cases of persistence during room occupancy changes were confirmed, along with 6 cases of possible persistence (contamination across noncontiguous room occupancy events). Conclusions: Active surveillance screening and a recurring evaluation of terminal cleaning procedures should be considered due to high levels of circulation and persistence of MRSA and VRE in the nursing home setting.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Research and implementation of a whole-genome sequencing surveillance system for outbreak detection
Authors: Sundermann Alexander , Griffith Marissa , Srinivasa Vatsala Rangachar , Waggle Kady , Saul Melissa , Ayres Ashley , Snyder Graham , Marsh Jane , Harrison Lee
Published: May 2022

Background: Traditional infection prevention (IP) methods for outbreak detection often rely on geotemporal clustering confined to single locations. We recently developed the Enhanced Detection System for Healthcare-Associated Transmission (EDS-HAT), which combines whole-genome sequencing (WGS) surveillance and machine learning of the electronic health record (EHR). Our retrospective research findings show potential transmissions averted and cost savings using EDS-HAT in real time. Here, we describe the process and initial findings from EDS-HAT real-time implementation. Methods: Real-time whole-genome sequencing surveillance began on November 1, 2021. Patient cultures positive for select bacterial pathogens who were hospitalized for ≥3 days or had a recent healthcare exposure in the prior 30-days were collected. Isolates were deemed genetically related if ≤15 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified for all organisms except Clostridioides difficile (≤2 SNPs). Clusters were manually investigated by both research and IP teams, and interventions were performed by the IP team. Data on collection, analysis, notification, and intervention dates were gathered. Results: As of January 11, 2022, 413 isolates had undergone whole-genome sequencing. Among them, 18 unique patient isolates were genetically related to ≥1 other isolate, comprising 7 clusters (range, 2–6 patients). Notable findings include a Pseudomonas aeruginosa cluster possibly related to a shared bronchoscope, a pseudo-outbreak of Serratia marcescens related to autopsy blood culture practice, and a cluster of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium on a shared transplant unit. Only 1 cluster of 2 isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae had no known possible transmission routes. The median turnaround time from patient’s culture date to IP notification was 19 days (range, 13–28), with noted delays over the winter holiday. Concusions: Real-time WGS can identify small clusters including potentially interruptible transmission routes. Rapid turnaround time, coordination between clinical and genomic laboratories, and a robust IP team are key factors in implementing a WGS surveillance program. Real-time WGS surveillance has the potential to reduce costs for hospitals, improve patient safety, and save lives.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Racial disparities in rate of central-line–associated bloodstream infections and catheter-associated urinary tract infections
Authors: Gettler Erin , Seidelman Jessica , Krishnan Jay , Alavian Naseem , Kalu Ibukun , Campbell Melissa , Lewis Sarah , Anderson Deverick , Smith Becky
Published: May 2022

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare access, medical treatment, and outcomes have been extensively reported. However, the impact of racial and ethnic differences in patient safety, including healthcare-associated infections, has not been well described. Methods: We performed a retrospective review analyzing prospectively collected data on central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rates per 1,000 device days. Data for adult patients admitted to an academic medical center between 2018 and 2021 were stratified by 7 racial and ethnic groups: non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and othe. The “other” group was composed of bi- or multiracial patients, or those for whom no data were reported. We compared the CLABSI and CAUTI rates between the different racial and ethnic groups using Poisson regression. Results: Compared to non-Hispanic White patients, the rate of CLABSI was significantly higher in non-Hispanic Black patients (1.27; 95% CI, 1.02–1.58; P < .03) and those in the “other” race category (1.79; 95% CI, 1.39–2.30; P < .001, respectively), and these trends increased in Hispanic/Latino patients (Table 1). Similarly, Black patients had higher rates of CAUTI (1.42; 95% CI, 1.05–1.92; P < .02), as did Asian patients (2.49; 95% CI, 1.16–5.36; P < .02), and patients in the “other” category (1.52; 95% CI, 1.06–2.18; P < .02) (Table 2). Conclusions: Racial and ethnic minorities may be vulnerable to a higher rate of patient safety events, including CLABSIs and CAUTIs. Additional analyses controlling for potential confounding factors are needed to better understand the relationship between race or ethnicity, clinical management, and healthcare-associated infections. This evaluation is essential to inform mitigation strategies and to provide optimum, equitable care for all.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Perceptions toward and practices regarding antibiotic stewardship and use among physicians at tertiary-care public hospitals in Bangladesh
Authors: Amin Sumon Shariful , Islam Saiful , Dostogir Harun Golam
Published: May 2022

Background: The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is affecting public health management in developing countries, including Bangladesh. Irrational and inappropriate use of antibiotics in healthcare settings has led to widespread drug resistance. To optimize antimicrobial usage to combat AMR and enhance infection treatment, the competence of healthcare workers in antibiotic prescribing is indispensable. We sought to determine the perceptions about antimicrobial resistance, antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs), and antibiotic prescribing approaches among physicians at tertiary-care public hospitals in Bangladesh. Methods: From September to December 2020, we conducted a mixed-methods study in 9 tertiary-care public hospitals. Using a self-administered, semistructured questionnaire, we collected data on antibiotic stewardship and prescribing practices from 452 on-duty physicians. In addition, we conducted 16 key-informant interviews to explore AMR perceptions and determinants. Results: Only 43.8% of physicians were aware of the ASP, and none of the hospitals had any ASP initiative in place. Most of the participants (70.6%) recommended tailored training and antibiotic prescribing guidelines (63.7%) for effective ASP initiatives. More than half of the physicians (54.7%) preferred to receive regular monitoring and feedback on their routine antibiotic prescriptions from the stewardship program. In terms of the antibiotic prescribing approach, only 25.9% of physicians relied on microbiology lab findings, whereas 69.5% routinely employed oral or intravenous antibiotics. Also, 40.0% of physicians considered the patient’s ability to afford the antibiotic cost when recommending antibiotics. The qualitative investigation identified the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, absence of guidelines, and inadequate laboratory support as factors contributing to AMR in the healthcare setting. Self-medication, over-the-counter dispensing, and patients’ economic instability to complete the dosage were also attributed to the irrational use of antibiotics. As a priority step, physicians advocated for intensive training on antibiotic advising, mass awareness campaigns on safe antibiotic usage and dispensing, and a restriction on the widespread sale of antibiotics from pharmacies. Conclusions: Despite favorable perceptions, the fundamental understanding of physicians regarding ASPs and rational prescribing of antibiotics needs to be improved through context-specific educational interventions and capacity building. In addition, a coherent and comprehensive policy is required for the development and implementation of antibiotic usage guidelines along with integrated ASP initiatives to combat AMR.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
COVID-19 incidence among nonphysician healthcare workers at a tertiary care center–Iowa, 2020–2021
Authors: Kobayashi Takaaki , Heinemann John , Trannel Alexandra , Marra Alexandre , Etienne William , Abosi Oluchi , Holley Stephanie , Kukla Mary , Dains Angie , Jenn Kyle , Meacham Holly , Hanna Beth , Ford Bradley , Wellington Melanie , Hartley Patrick , Diekema Daniel , Salinas Jorge
Published: May 2022

Background: Whether working on COVID-19 designated units put healthcare workers (HCWs) at higher risk of acquiring COVID-19 is not fully understood. We report trends of COVID-19 incidence among nonphysician HCWs and the association between the risk of acquiring COVID-19 and work location in the hospital. Methods: The University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics (UIHC) is an 811-bed, academic medical center serving as a referral center for Iowa. We retrospectively collected COVID-19–associated data for nonphysician HCWs from Employee Health Clinic between June 1st 2020 and July 31th 2021. The data we abstracted included age, sex, job title, working location, history of COVID-19, and date of positive COVID-19 test if they had a history of COVID-19. We excluded HCWs who did not have a designated working location and those who worked on multiple units during the same shift (eg, medicine resident, hospitalist, etc) to assess the association between COVID-19 infections and working location. Job titles were divided into the following 5 categories: (1) nurse, (2) medical assistant (MA), (3) technician, (4) clerk, and (5) others (eg patient access, billing office, etc). Working locations were divided into the following 6 categories: (1) emergency department (ED), (2) COVID-19 unit, (3) non–COVID-19 unit, (4) Clinic, (5) perioperative units, and (6) remote work. Results: We identified 6,971 HCWs with work locations recorded. During the study period, 758 HCWs (10.8%) reported being diagnosed with COVID-19. Of these 758 COVID-19 cases, 658 (86.8%) were diagnosed before vaccines became available. The location with the highest COVID-19 incidence was the ED (17%), followed by both COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 units (12.7%), clinics (11.0%), perioperative units (9.4%) and remote work stations (6.6%, p Conclusions: Strict and special infection control strategies may be needed for HCWs in the ED, especially where vaccine uptake is low. The administrative control of HCWs working remotely may be associated with a lower incidence of COVID-19. Given that the difference in COVID-19 incidence among HCWs by location was lower and comparable after the availability of COVID-19 vaccines, facilities should make COVID-19 vaccination mandatory as a condition of employment for all HCWs, especially in areas where the COVID-19 incidence is high.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Which nursing home workers were at highest risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the November 2020–February 2021 winter surge of COVID-1?
Authors: Kellogg Joseph , Dube William , Adams Carly , Collins Matthew , Lopman Theodore , Johnson Theodore , Amin Avnika , Weitz Joshua , Fridkin Scott
Published: May 2022

Background: Nursing home (NH) residents and staff were at high risk for COVID-19 early in the pandemic; several studies estimated seroprevalence of infection in NH staff to be 3-fold higher among CNAs and nurses compared to other staff. Risk mitigation added in Fall 2020 included systematic testing of residents and staff (and furlough if positive) to reduce transmission risk. We estimated risks for SARS-CoV-2 infection among NH staff during the first winter surge before widespread vaccination. Methods: Between February and May 2021, voluntary serologic testing was performed on NH staff who were seronegative for SARS-CoV-2 in late Fall 2020 (during a previous serology study at 14 Georgia NHs). An exposure assessment at the second time point covered prior 3 months of job activities, community exposures, and self-reported COVID-19 vaccination, including very recent vaccination (≤4 weeks). Risk factors for seroconversion were estimated by job type using multivariable logistic regression, accounting for interval community-incidence and interval change in resident infections per bed. Results: Among 203 eligible staff, 72 (35.5%) had evidence of interval seroconversion (Fig. 1). Among 80 unvaccinated staff, interval infection was significantly higher among CNAs and nurses (aOR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.4–20.7) than other staff, after adjusting for race and interval community incidence and facility infections. This risk persisted but was attenuated when utilizing the full study cohort including those with very recent vaccination (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.9–3.7). Conclusions: Midway through the first year of the pandemic, NH staff with close or common resident contact continued to be at increased risk for infection despite enhanced infection prevention efforts. Mitigation strategies, prior to vaccination, did not eliminate occupational risk for infection. Vaccine utilization is critical to eliminate occupational risk among frontline healthcare providers.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Characteristics of healthcare personnel who reported concerns related to PPE use during care of COVID-19 patients
Authors: Chea Nora , Tavitian Stephanie , Brown Cedric , Eure Taniece , Alkis Rebecca , Blazek Gregory , Penna Austin , Nadle Joelle , Frank Linda , Czaja Christopher , Johnston Helen , Barter Devra , Angell Kathleen , Marshall Kristen , Meek James , Brackney Monica , Carswell Stacy , Thomas Stepy , Fridkin Scott , Wilson Lucy , Fell Ashley , Lovett Sara , Lim Sarah , Lynfield Ruth , SarahShrum Ruth , Phipps Erin C. , Sievers Marla , Dumyati Ghinwa , Concannon Cate , McCullough Kathryn , Woods  , Seshadri Sandhya , Myers Christopher , Pierce Rebecca , Ocampo Valerie , Guzman-Cottrill Judith , Escutia Gabriela , Samper Monika , Pena Sandra , Adre Cullen , Markus Tiffanie , Billings Kathryn , Groenewold Matthew , Sinkowitz-Cochran Ronda , Magill Shelley , Grigg Cheri , Miller Betsy
Published: May 2022

Background: Healthcare facilities have experienced many challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, including limited personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies. Healthcare personnel (HCP) rely on PPE, vaccines, and other infection control measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections. We describe PPE concerns reported by HCP who had close contact with COVID-19 patients in the workplace and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Method: The CDC collaborated with Emerging Infections Program (EIP) sites in 10 states to conduct surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 infections in HCP. EIP staff interviewed HCP with positive SARS-CoV-2 viral tests (ie, cases) to collect data on demographics, healthcare roles, exposures, PPE use, and concerns about their PPE use during COVID-19 patient care in the 14 days before the HCP’s SARS-CoV-2 positive test. PPE concerns were qualitatively coded as being related to supply (eg, low quality, shortages); use (eg, extended use, reuse, lack of fit test); or facility policy (eg, lack of guidance). We calculated and compared the percentages of cases reporting each concern type during the initial phase of the pandemic (April–May 2020), during the first US peak of daily COVID-19 cases (June–August 2020), and during the second US peak (September 2020–January 2021). We compared percentages using mid-P or Fisher exact tests (α = 0.05). Results: Among 1,998 HCP cases occurring during April 2020–January 2021 who had close contact with COVID-19 patients, 613 (30.7%) reported ≥1 PPE concern (Table 1). The percentage of cases reporting supply or use concerns was higher during the first peak period than the second peak period (supply concerns: 12.5% vs 7.5%; use concerns: 25.5% vs 18.2%; p Conclusions: Although lower percentages of HCP cases overall reported PPE concerns after the first US peak, our results highlight the importance of developing capacity to produce and distribute PPE during times of increased demand. The difference we observed among selected groups of cases may indicate that PPE access and use were more challenging for some, such as nonphysicians and nursing home HCP. These findings underscore the need to ensure that PPE is accessible and used correctly by HCP for whom use is recommended.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Improved assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 from nonporous hospital surfaces using surrogate human coronavirus OC43
Authors: Tran Lisa , Furin William , Woo Park Geun , Edwards Martinique , Whitworth Carrie
Published: May 2022

Background: Understanding SARS-CoV-2 persistence on surfaces can help inform transmission risk from surfaces in healthcare and community settings. A sensitive viral infectivity assay is crucial for the detection of infective virus in environmental investigations. The conventional cell culture-based infectivity assay is limited by the time dependence, subjectivity, and insensitivity of cytopathic effect (CPE) scoring. We validated an integrated cell-culture and reverse-transcription quantitative RT-PCR method (cc-RT-qPCR) to improve SARS-CoV-2 detection and reduce detection time. We compared cc-RT-qPCR with CPE-scored cell culture to evaluate assay sensitivity of recovered virus from stainless-steel coupons simulating nonporous healthcare surfaces. Method: Human β-coronavirus OC43, a model strain for SARS-CoV-2, was propagated on HRT-18G cells in growth medium at 33°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The OC43 infectivity was determined by cell culture with a 10-fold dilution series of viral samples in 96-well plates, and incubation for 7 days at 33°C to confirm CPE. Plates were CPE-scored and TCID50 was calculated using the Reed-Muench method. For the cc-RT-qPCR assay, CPE-negative wells were interrogated for viral intracellular replication using RT-PCR; infectivity was based on a titer increase of ≥ 2 logs 7 days after inoculation using RT-qPCR. CPE-positive or replicative virus-harboring cells were enumerated to determine TCID50. The sensitivity of both CPE-scored cell culture and cc-RT-qPCR assays were evaluated by inoculating 105 TCID50/mL OC43 in infection media and artificial saliva matrices onto coupons and dried in an environmental chamber at 26°C and 57% relative humidity for 6 hours. Viral eluates from coupons served as test samples. Results: Low-titer infectious OC43 (0.75 log10) was detected by both methods 7 days after incubation; however, infectivity confirmation required 4 and 6 days after incubation, respectively, for cc-RT-qPCR and CPE-scored cell culture methods. When cells were inoculated with OC43 at titer range 1.75–4.75 log10, CPE presented at 4–5 days after incubation, while viral replication was already detected at 3 days after incubation via RT-PCR. Upon virus titration, cc-RT-qPCR demonstrated greater sensitivity, detecting up to 1 log10 higher of infectious OC43 than cell culture alone at 0 and 6 hours (P ≤ .05) dried in infection medium and 0 hours (P ≤ .05) in saliva. Conclusions: Our data demonstrated greater sensitivity and shorter times to detect viral replication by cc-RT-qPCR, minimizing potential for false-negative results with cell culture alone. This sensitive assay may provide investigators with quicker results for informing infection control practices to reduce risk of transmission from deposited bodily fluids on surfaces, eg, coughing and sneezing.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Temporal trends in urine-culture rates in the US acute-care hospitals, 2017–2020
Authors: Kazakova Sophia , McCarthy Natalie , Baggs James , Hatfield Kelly , Wolford Babatunde , Olubajo Babatunde , Jernigan John , Reddy Sujan
Published: May 2022

Background: Previously, we reported decreasing postadmission urine-culture rates in hospitalized patients between 2012 and 2017, indicating a possible decrease in hospital-onset urinary tract infections or changes in diagnostic practices in acute-care hospitals (ACHs). In this study, we re-evaluated the trends using more recent data from 2017–2020 to assess whether new trends in hospital urine-culturing practices had emerged. Method: We conducted a longitudinal analysis of monthly urine-culture rates using microbiology data from 355 ACHs participating in the Premier Healthcare Database in 2017–2020. All cultures from the urinary tract collected on or before day 3 were defined as admission urine cultures and those collected on day 4 or later were defined as postadmission urine cultures. We included discharges from months where a hospital reported at least 1 urine culture with microbiology and antimicrobial susceptibility test results. Annual estimates of rates of admission culture and postadmission urine-culture rates were assessed using general estimating equation models with a negative binomial distribution accounting for hospital-level clustering and adjusting for hospital bed size, teaching status, urban–rural designation, discharge month, and census division. Estimated rate for each year (2018, 2019, and 2020) was compared to previous year’s estimated rate using rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated through the multivariable GEE models. Results: From 2017 to 2020, we included 8.7 million discharges and 1,943,540 urine cultures, of which 299,013 (15.4%) were postadmission urine cultures. In 2017–2020, unadjusted admission culture rates were 20.0, 19.6, 17.9, and 18.2 per 100 discharges respectively; similarly, unadjusted postadmission urine-culture rates were 8.6, 7.8, 7.0, and 7.5 per 1,000 patient days. In the multivariable analysis, adjusting for hospital characteristics, no significant changes in admission urine-culture rates were detected during 2017–2019; however, in 2020, admission urine-culture rates increased 6% compared to 2019 (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02–1.09) (Fig. 1). Postadmission urine-culture rates decreased 4% in 2018 compared to 2017 (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.91–0.99) and 8% in 2019 compared to 2018 (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87–0.96). In 2020, postadmission urine-culture rates increased 10% compared to 2019 (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06–1.14) (Fig. 2). Factors significantly associated with postadmission urine-culture rates included discharge month and hospital bed size. For admission urine cultures, discharge month was the only significant factor. Conclusions: Between 2017–2019, postadmission urine-culture rates continued a decreasing trend, while admission culture rates remained unchanged. However, in 2020 both admission and postadmission urine culture rates increased significantly in comparison to 2019.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Predicting the regional impact of interventions to prevent and contain multidrug-resistant organisms
Authors: Cincotta Samuel , Soda Elizabeth , Slayton Rachel , Ham David , Walters Maroya , Paul Prabasaj
Published: May 2022

Background: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), such as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), can spread rapidly in a region. Facilities that care for high-acuity patients with long average lengths of stay (eg, long-term acute-care hospitals or LTACHs and ventilator-capable skilled nursing facilities or vSNFs) may amplify this spread. We assessed the impact of interventions on CRE spread within a region individually, bundled, and implemented at different facility types. Methods: We developed a deterministic compartmental model, parametrized using CRE data reported to the NHSN and patient transfer data from the CMS specific to a US state. The model includes the community and the healthcare facilities within the state. Individuals may be either susceptible or infected and infectious. Infected patients determined to have CRE through admission screening or point-prevalence surveys at a facility are placed in a state of lower transmissibility if enhanced infection prevention and control (IPC) practices are in place. Results: Intervention bundles that included periodic point-prevalence surveys and enhanced IPC at high-acuity postacute-care facilities had the greatest impact on regional prevalence 10 years into an outbreak; the benefits of including admission screening and improved interfacility communication were more modest (Fig. 1A). Delaying interventions by 3 years is predicted to result in smaller reductions in prevalence (Fig. 1B). Increasing the frequency of point-prevalence surveys from biannually to quarterly resulted in a substantial relative reduction in prevalence (from 25% to 44%) if conducted from the start of an outbreak. IPC improvements in vSNFs resulted in greater relative reductions than in LTACHs. Admission screening at LTACHs and vSNFs was predicted to have a greater impact on prevalence if in place prior to CRE introduction (~20% reduction), and the impact decreased by approximately half if implementation was delayed until 3 years after CRE introduction. In contrast, the effect of admission screening in ACH was less (~10% reduction in prevalence) and did not change with implementation delays. Conclusions: Our model suggests that interventions that limit unrecognized MDRO introduction to, or dispersal from, LTACHs and vSNFs through screening are predicted to slow distribution regionally. Interventions to detect colonization and improve IPC practices within LTACHs and vSNFs may substantially reduce the regional burden. Prevention strategies are predicted to have the greatest impact when interventions are bundled and implemented before an MDRO is identified in a region, but reduction in overall prevalence is still possible if implemented after initial MDRO spread.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None
Is patient discharge after blood culture collection in the emergency department safe? A retrospective study in Japan
Authors: Miwa Toshiki , Takamatsu Akane , Honda Hitoshi
Published: May 2022

Background: Drawing blood cultures in the emergency room (ER) is essential for detecting bloodstream infections (BSIs). Although a practice of drawing blood culture usually indicates a presence of severe infection requiring hospitalization, some patients may nonetheless be safely discharged from the ER. Previous studies demonstrated that patients with a positive blood culture after ER discharge had favorable clinical outcomes. Moreover, given the increasing incidence of febrile illnesses, especially in the era of COVID-19, the shortage of inpatient hospital beds may lend further justification to this practice. We investigated the prevalence, outcomes, and factors associated with patient discharge from the ER after blood collection. Method: The present, nested, case–control study comparing patients initially discharged from the ER with those directly admitted to the study institution was conducted at a 790-bed tertiary-care medical center in Tokyo, Japan. The ratio of the respective patients was 1:3. Factors associated with ER discharge after a blood-culture collection were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: From January 2014 through December 2020, 153,432 patients visited the ER. Blood cultures were obtained for 19,010 patients; 2,575 (13.5%) of these had a true BSI, and of the latter, 142 (5.5%) were initially discharged from the ER. During 2020, the proportion of patients with ER discharge increased 1.7 times over previous years. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between the groups (2.1% vs 4.5%; P = .31). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors significantly associated with the decision to discharge after blood culture collection were the absence of hypotension (aOR], 14,92; 95% CI, 3.38–65.93), lack of altered mental status (aOR, 8.44; 95% CI, 3.28–21.71) at ER presentation, unknown diagnosis at ER discharge (aOR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.97–7.16), high level C-reactive protein (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87–0.94), and a diagnosis of intra-abdominal or hepatobiliary infection (aOR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04–0.29). Conclusions: ER discharge after drawing blood for a culture was more frequently seen in the current COVID-19 era and was deemed acceptable under certain circumstances, such as patients with no systemic illnesses or specific diagnosis who may be managed safely without compromising clinical outcomes.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None