P041 Successful Reduction in Opioid Prescription for IBD Flare in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study and Quality Improvement Initiative
Authors: Park Steven , Graziano Elliot , Lee Edwin , Bittner Krystle , Acquisto Nicole , DeCross Arthur , Marino Danielle 
Published: December 2021

BACKGROUND:

Opioid use is associated with increased mortality, emergency department (ED) utilization, 30-day readmission rates and decreased quality-of-life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Opioid use in the ED for acute IBD presentations has not been well characterized in the literature. Safe, evidence-based, and effective pain management guidance for IBD flares is needed to promote opioid stewardship in the ED.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who presented to an academic tertiary center ED with IBD flares from June 2019 through December 2019. Demographic and disease specific information and ED course, including analgesic use and numeric rating pain scores at ED presentation and discharge, were collected from the medical record. We designed and implemented a multimodal quality improvement intervention consisting of an evidenced-based IBD pain guideline, customized electronic health record order-set, Gastroenterology (GI) consult note smart-phrase and clinician education to promote opioid stewardship. The impact of our intervention was measured with a repeat retrospective analysis from December 2020 through April 2021. Run charts were generated to correlate the timing of interventions to changes in opioid exposure and prescription.

RESULTS:

Seventy-one patients were included in the pre-intervention cohort. A total of 78% of patients who presented to the ED with IBD flare were prescribed opioid(s) with an average of 29.3 morphine milligram equivalence (MME) per ED stay. Approximately half (49%) of patients did not receive any non-opioid analgesic and 13% patients received an opioid prescription at ED or hospital discharge. In the post-intervention cohort consisting of 49 patients, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients receiving opioids (45% vs. 78%; p < 0.001) and a significant reduction in the average total opioid administration (10.8 vs. 22.6 MME; p < 0.001). For each month during the post-intervention period, the proportion of patients who received an opioid in the ED and the average total opioid administered remained less than the median of the entire study period, which represents a nonrandom pattern. The use of a non-opioid analgesic, IV acetaminophen, was significantly increased (27% vs 3%; p < 0.001) and the risk of new or recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding was negligible in both cohorts (0% vs. 1%; p = 1.0). There was no significant difference between the average pain score (4.9 vs. 5.4 [10-point-scale]; p=0.440) and the difference between reported triage and final ED pain scores (-1.8 vs. -2.0; p=0.729). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in GI consultation (35% vs. 58%; p <0.016) and a non-significant reduction in hospital admission (63% vs. 80%; p=0.058).

CONCLUSION:

Almost 80% of patients who present to ED with IBD flare are prescribed opioids, while only half of patients receive non-opioid analgesics. Also concerning was the high rate of opioid prescription at ED or hospital discharge. A multimodal intervention successfully reduced the proportion and amount of opioid prescribing in the ED without compromising pain control or increasing the risk of GI bleeding. This was also associated with a significant increase in a non-opioid analgesic administration and a significant decrease in GI service consultation. These findings support the role of implementing an evidence-based IBD pain management guideline with electronic prescribing support and education in the ED setting for acute IBD flares. Additional research is needed to determine long-term benefits of reduced opioid exposure in this population.