Frequency and Prognostic Value of Acute Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Authors: Nalesnik E. O. , Repin A. N. 
Published: February 2024

Background. Periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) is an acute complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Its frequency and relationship with the prognosis of the disease are especially important in elective interventions due to the low risk of ischemic events in this cohort of patients. However, according to the literature, there are significant differences in the criteria for PMI and type 4a myocardial infarction (MI), and, accordingly, their frequency and their prognostic value. Aim. To study the frequency and magnitude of PMI during elective PCI in terms of the level of periprocedural increase in cardiospecific biomarkers, as well as to determine the relationship of PMI with long-term adverse events in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Materials and methods. A single-center open retrospective cohort study was conducted, which included 435 patients (367/84.4 % men, mean age 58.3±8.6 years) from the elective PCI registry. PMI was diagnosed with an increase in the level of creatine phosphokinase MB fraction (CK-MB) or or cardiac troponin I (cTn I) >1×99 percentile URL (Upper Reference Limit), while the level of increase in biomarkers >1, 2, 3, 4 or >5×99 percentile URL was recorded. An increase in biomarkers >5x99 URL percentile was assessed as a large PMI, and in the presence of clinical and imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium, as periprocedural MI type 4a. Depending on the level of periprocedural increase in biomarkers, the relative risk (RR) of developing long-term (within 5 years after index PCI) adverse cardiovascular events, death, as well as clinically significant bleeding and newly diagnosed malignant oncological diseases was calculated. In addition, the correlation between PMI and the above endpoints was summarized using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results. The frequency of periprocedural PMI diagnosed by increased biomarkers >1×99 percentile URL was 40.2 %, >2×99 percentile URL — 9.7 %, >3×99 percentile URL — 6.7 %, >4×99 percentile URL — 4.8 %, >5×99 percentile URL — 3.5 %, type 4a MI — in 2 patients (0.46 %). An association of “major” PMI (>5x99 percentile URL) with cardiovascular complications within 3 years after elective PCI, including fatal ones, was revealed: for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), RR — 6.516, confidence interval (CI) [2.375-17.881]; for death from cardiovascular causes RR — 6.538, CI [1.695-25.227]. An association of “moderate” PMI (>3, but <5 ×99 URL percentile) with acute ischemic events within 3 years after elective PCI was shown: for AMI, RR was 4.073, CI [1.598 — 10.378]. An association of “minor” AKI (>1, but <5 ×99 URL percentile) with acute ischemic events within 3 years after elective PCI was shown: for AMI, RR was 4.073, CI [1.598 — 10.378]. An association of “minor” AKI (>1, but <3 ×99 URL percentile) with newly diagnosed malignant oncological diseases within 5 years after index PCI was revealed: RR 2.319; CI [1.248- 4.310]. An association of late thrombotic events, such as stent thrombosis (index and re-interventions), stent occlusion (index and non-index) as a reason for re-intervention within 5 years after index PCI, was found with most PMI subgroups. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the dependence of clinically significant bleeding within 5 years after index PCI on the development of “moderate” PMI (p=0.003), as well as the association of non-cardiovascular death within 5 years after index PCI with “minor” PMI (p= 0.007). Conclusion. Registration of periprocedural increase in cardiac biomarkers should be carried out during planned PCI not only for the purpose of diagnosing and predicting acute and late ischemic events, but also for assessing the risk of developing stent occlusion, clinically significant bleeding and prognostically important comorbidities in the long-term (5-year) period in order to identification of groups of patients requiring active monitoring, additional examination and selection of an optimal treatment regimen at the outpatient stage of rehabilitation.