Abstract A004: Clinical test design affects tumor tissue and ctDNA FGFR gene status in metastatic urothelial cancer: a prospective study
Authors: Müller David C. , Vandekerkhove Gillian , Murtha Andrew J. , Bacon Jack V.W. , Vasquez-Rios Carlos , Stephenson Maria , Rostin Kimia , Schönlau Elena , Wells Connor , Parimi Sunil , Noonan Krista , Basappa Naveen S. , Ko Jenny J. , Finch Daygen , Alimohamed Nimira , Bismar Tarek A. , Wang Gang , Papadakis Andreas , Nappi Lucia , Annala Matti , Bernales Cecily Q. , Spatz Alan , Chi Kim N. , Wyatt Alexander W. , Eigl Bernhard J. 
Published: May 2024

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene alterations are common in urothelial cancer (UC) and targetable with erdafitinib. The co-approved companion diagnostic is an amplicon-based tumor tissue test that detects a limited number of recurrent FGFR alterations. However, FGFR status may change during disease progression, and rare FGFR alterations not typically covered by existing tests may be of clinical importance. Therefore, in a prospective pan-Canadian study (NCT06129084), we compared standard archival tissue testing to broad targeted sequencing of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect FGFR alterations in UC. Eligible patients had progressing metastatic UC and were undergoing tissue FGFR testing. Blood was drawn at study enrollment and plasma cell-free DNA and matched white blood cell DNA underwent deep-targeted sequencing with a hybridization capture panel including the introns and exons of FGFR1-4 and the common breakpoint region of TACC3. Archival tissue selection and testing was initiated by the treating physician and typically used the Oncomine Focus assay. 210 patients were enrolled across 12 sites, and 140 patients have tissue and ctDNA results available for concordance assessment. 43/140 (31%) of cell-free DNA samples had low tumor fraction (&lt;0.5%) and were considered inconclusive. For the remaining 97 same-patient tissue and ctDNA pairs, FGFR status was identical in 88 (91%). In 7 of 9 discordant cases, the tissue was negative, but ctDNA was positive for FGFR alterations: these were enriched for FGFR3-TACC3 fusions (4/7). Two discordant fusions had canonical breakpoints that can be identified by current amplicon-based companion diagnostics, indicating potential spatiotemporal heterogeneity in somatic FGFR status. The other two discordant (ctDNA-only) fusions had non-canonical breakpoints that are not amenable to detection by current amplicon-based companion diagnostics. In two mutation discordant cases (S249C positive in ctDNA only), lack of signal in tumor tissue could be explained by the presence of additional FGFR3 variants within 25bp of S249 and in cis - disrupting primer binding sites. There were only two cases of tissue-only FGFR alterations among the 97 evaluable pairs (FGFR3-TACC3 fusion, S249C). ctDNA testing of metastatic UC with a broad capture-based approach covering all exons and introns of FGFR genes can identify additional alterations not detected with current amplicon-based companion diagnostics applied to archival tissue. Our results support ctDNA testing as a valuable adjunct to tissue testing, but not as a replacement due to the high frequency of inconclusive ctDNA results, secondary to tumor fraction below the threshold. Assay design, including target enrichment technique, is a significant source of variability in tissue and ctDNA FGFR status and should be carefully considered in future clinical biomarker testing strategies.

Citation Format: David C. Müller, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Andrew J. Murtha, Jack V.W. Bacon, Carlos Vasquez-Rios, Maria Stephenson, Kimia Rostin, Elena Schönlau, Connor Wells, Sunil Parimi, Krista Noonan, Naveen S. Basappa, Jenny J. Ko, Daygen Finch, Nimira Alimohamed, Tarek A. Bismar, Gang Wang, Andreas Papadakis, Lucia Nappi, Matti Annala, Cecily Q. Bernales, Alan Spatz, Kim N. Chi, Alexander W. Wyatt, Bernhard J. Eigl. Clinical test design affects tumor tissue and ctDNA FGFR gene status in metastatic urothelial cancer: a prospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Bladder Cancer: Transforming the Field; 2024 May 17-20; Charlotte, NC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2024;30(10_Suppl):Abstract nr A004.