Α Virtual Reality App for Physical and Cognitive Training of Older People With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study (Preprint)
Authors: Hassandra Mary , Galanis Evangelos , Hatzigeorgiadis Antonis , Goudas Marios , Mouzakidis Christos , Karathanasi Eleni Maria , Petridou Niki , Tsolaki Magda , Zikas Paul , Evangelou Giannis , Papagiannakis George , Bellis George , Kokkotis Christos , Panagiotopoulos Spyridon Rafail , Giakas Giannis , Theodorakis Yannis 
Published: March 2021

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as an effective treatment modality for cognitive and physical training in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, to replace existing nonpharmaceutical treatment training protocols, VR platforms need significant improvement if they are to appeal to older people with symptoms of cognitive decline and meet their specific needs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to design and test the acceptability, usability, and tolerability of an immersive VR platform that allows older people with MCI symptoms to simultaneously practice physical and cognitive skills on a dual task.

METHODS

On the basis of interviews with 20 older people with MCI symptoms (15 females; mean age 76.25, SD 5.03 years) and inputs from their health care providers (formative study VR1), an interdisciplinary group of experts developed a VR system called VRADA (VR Exercise App for Dementia and Alzheimer’s Patients). Using an identical training protocol, the VRADA system was first tested with a group of 30 university students (16 females; mean age 20.86, SD 1.17 years) and then with 27 older people (19 females; mean age 73.22, SD 9.26 years) who had been diagnosed with MCI (feasibility studies VR2a and VR2b). Those in the latter group attended two Hellenic Association Day Care Centers for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders. Participants in both groups were asked to perform a dual task training protocol that combined physical and cognitive exercises in two different training conditions. In condition A, participants performed a cycling task in a lab environment while being asked by the researcher to perform oral math calculations (single-digit additions and subtractions). In condition B, participants performed a cycling task in the virtual environment while performing calculations that appeared within the VR app. Participants in both groups were assessed in the same way; this included questionnaires and semistructured interviews immediately after the experiment to capture perceptions of acceptability, usability, and tolerability, and to determine which of the two training conditions each participant preferred.

RESULTS

Participants in both groups showed a significant preference for the VR condition (students: mean 0.66, SD 0.41, <i>t</i><sub>29</sub>=8.74, <i>P</i>&lt;.001; patients with MCI: mean 0.72, SD 0.51, <i>t</i><sub>26</sub>=7.36, <i>P</i>&lt;.001), as well as high acceptance scores for intended future use, attitude toward VR training, and enjoyment. System usability scale scores (82.66 for the students and 77.96 for the older group) were well above the acceptability threshold (75/100). The perceived adverse effects were minimal, indicating a satisfactory tolerability.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that VRADA is an acceptable, usable, and tolerable system for physical and cognitive training of older people with MCI and university students. Randomized controlled trial studies are needed to assess the efﬁcacy of VRADA as a tool to promote physical and cognitive health in patients with MCI.