Validation of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2.0 in Italian Hospitals: A Cross‐Sectional Study of Healthcare Personnel Perceptions
Authors: Bagnasco Annamaria , Catania Gianluca , Loiudice Michele Tancredi , Bellandi Tommaso , Cavaliere Bruno , Carzaniga Sara , Cardinali Flavia , Zanini Milko , Sasso Loredana ,   the Working Group Study
Published: January 2025

Aim(s)

To adapt and validate the HSOPS 2 instrument for the Italian context and to describe the current patient safety culture amongst healthcare personnel working in Italian hospitals.

Design

Cross‐sectional study.

Methods

We adapted and validated the HSOPS 2 instrument following the COSMIN guidelines: we performed a forward‐backward translation, calculated the content validity index, evaluated face validity, acceptability (percentage of participants responding to all items on the questionnaire and to every specific item), construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis), and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha for each dimension). We then performed a cross‐sectional study following the guidelines of the original instrument: we categorised the responses into “positive,” “negative,” and “midpoints.” For each dimension we calculated the average percentage of positive responses. We repeated this process, dividing the responses by various sample characteristics (e.g., profession), and compared them using the chi‐square test. Data were collected between April and November 2023.

Results

A total of 633 hospital personnel participated in the survey, and 473 completed the questionnaire in its entirety. The dimensions of “teamwork”, “supervisor”, “manager”, or “clinical leader support”, and “communication about error” emerged as dimensions with higher percentages of positive responses, while those that received lower percentages were “hospital management support for patient safety”, “staffing and work pace”, and “response to error”. We identified statistically significant differences in many dimensions between gender, profession, and clinical inpatient units.

Conclusions

These findings provide a comprehensive overview of challenges and opportunities within the healthcare sector as regards patient safety culture and can inform the development of targeted interventions aimed at improving patient safety across healthcare organisations.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

Proper assessment of safety culture, one of the main indicators of patient safety, can inform the development of effective strategies and interventions to enhance patient safety.

Impact

What problem did the study address?

To effectively assess patient safety culture, it is essential to use valid and reliable tools.

It is crucial to proactively assess patient safety culture in hospital personnel, whether employed in clinical units, in management, or in support services, to develop initiatives aimed at improving patient safety.

What were the main findings?

The use of the adapted and validated version of the HSOPS 2 will produce valid and reliable evidence on patient safety culture.

Perception of patient safety culture differs amongst respondents according to gender, profession, clinical setting.

The dimensions of “hospital management support for patient safety”, “staffing and work pace”, and “response to error” were identified as those with the greatest need for improvement.

Where and on whom will the research have an impact?

Patient safety heavily impacts care at every level; therefore, this study could have an impact on healthcare organisations as well as healthcare workers, patients, and their families.

By making available an instrument that can contribute to a proper assessment of patient safety culture, this study might contribute to the development of appropriate strategies and targeted interventions to improve patient safety, quality of care and satisfaction while decreasing adverse events and related costs.

Reporting Method

The COSMIN guidelines were used for the validation of the instrument; the STROBE reporting guidelines were used for the cross‐sectional study.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.