Clinical evaluation and outcome in patients with heart failure receiving chemotherapy with different anti-cancer agents
Authors: Sunaga T , Okada T , Iso Y , Ebato M , Toshida T , Nawata S , Suzuki H , Kogo M 
Published: October 2024

Background

Over the last few decades, advances in cancer therapy have prolonged the life expectancies of patients diagnosed with malignancies. Although traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapy, and immunotherapy have improved survival rates, off-target adverse effects such as complications of the cardiovascular system require attention. The optimal strategy for modern chemotherapy should be based on a comprehensive approach for patients with cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, cardio-oncology has received increasing attention owing to the cardiotoxic effects of anti-cancer therapies.

Purpose

To assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) who received chemotherapy compared with those of a matched cohort with HF who did not receive chemotherapy, using real-world HF data.

Methods

This study used the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database of the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Disease. We identified 1,328,113 patients hospitalized for HF between April 2012 and March 2021. We excluded 14,043 patients with unknown outcomes, non-emergency admissions, and unknown chemotherapy data. The primary endpoint was readmission.

Thus, our study included 5,774 patients who received chemotherapy and 39,412 patients who did not. The propensity score (PS) was estimated using a logistic regression model, with chemotherapy as the dependent variable, and clinically score-matched analysis of 11,532 patients with HF with or without chemotherapy.

Results

Colon, lung, breast, and prostate cancers accounted for &gt; 60% of all cancer types. After PS matching, 62.5% and 19.5% of patients with HF had prostate and breast cancer, respectively. After PS matching, readmission was more frequently observed in patients undergoing chemotherapy than those not undergoing chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–1.36, p&lt;0.0001). Treatment with genomic epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (OR, 1.69; 95% CI 1.39–2.07), taxane (OR, 2.95; 95% CI 2.11–4.12), anthracyclines (OR, 1.86; 95% CI 1.19–2.90), and fluorouracil agents (OR, 1.65; 95% CI 1.18–2.30) resulted in a significant risk of readmission. Moreover, patients treated with endocrine therapy before hospitalization had significantly higher readmission rates than the matched patients who did not receive chemotherapy (aromatase inhibitors: OR, 1.40; 95% CI 1.19–1.65: anti-androgens: OR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.27–1.52: luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: OR, 1.18; 95% CI 1.08–1.30 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists: OR, 2.17; 95% CI 1.68–2.79).

Conclusions

Medical providers need to monitor and follow-up patients with HF, depending on the characteristics of the anticancer agents and types of cancer. Furthermore, close collaboration among oncologists, cardiologists, and healthcare professionals will ensure the delivery of optimal care for patients with HF undergoing chemotherapy.