Evaluate the Effect of Commercially Available Denture Cleansers on Surface Hardness and Roughness of Denture Liners at Various Time Intervals
Authors:   Reader, Department of prosthodontics, M R Ambedkar Demtal college & Hospital, Bangalore, INDIA, Mohammed Hilal S. , Singh Sumeet ,   Post graduate student, Department of prosthodontics, M R Ambedkar Demtal college & Hospital, Bangalore, INDIA;, Hari Prasad A. ,   Reader, Department of prosthodontics, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bangalore, INDIA;, Amarnath G. S. ,   Professor & HOD, Department of Prosthodontics, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bangalore, INDIA, Kundapur Vinaya ,   Senior Lecturer, Departemenrt of prosthodontics, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bangalore, INDIA, Pasha Naveed ,   Post graduate student, Department of prosthodontics, M R Ambedkar Demtal college & Hospital, Bangalore, INDIA;, Anand M. ,   Reader, department of prosthodontics, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bangalore, INDIA
Published: July 2023

Background and objective: Chemical cleansing by denture cleansers is first choice for denture plaque control. The most common problems while using denture cleansers are hardening, porosity, odor sorption, water sorption, solubility, and colour change, bacterial and fungal growth. Chemical cleansing procedures have been found to have an effect on the physical and mechanical properties of denture liners. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the effect of commercially available denture cleansers on surface hardness and roughness of acrylic and silicon based denture liners at various time interval. Method: Two autopolymerising denture liners Kooliner (acrylic) and GC reline soft (silicon) were tested with two commercially available denture cleansers, polident and efferdent plus. Total of 120 specimens were prepared and all the specimens were divided into six groups based on the relining materials and denture cleansers used. Surface hardness and surface roughness was tested using Shore A durometer and profilometer respectively at the end of day 1, day 7, day 30 and day 90. All the specimens were stored in artificial saliva throughout the study. Cleanser solution was prepared daily by adding Polident and Efferdent plus denture cleanser tablet into 250ml of enough very warm (not hot) water. Acrylic and silicon liner groups were cleansed in a solution of denture cleanser and water for 15 minutes daily, rinsed with water and stored in artificial saliva at room temperature. The data was analyzed with one way ANOVA and independent t-test. Result: The acrylic soft lining showed gradual hardening and increase in surface roughness after immersion in denture cleanser and also with time. Acrylic liner material showed maximum hardness and roughness with Polident followed by Efferdent plus and water (control group). Silicone lining material showed a slight difference in hardness and roughness between the test group and control group. There was a slight increase in hardness in all the groups with time. Very slight increase in mean surface roughness of all the silicon liner groups from day 1 to day 90 was observed. A statistically significant change was noted between and within the all silicon liner groups on day 7, day 30 and day 90. Conclusion: The average surface hardness and surface roughness were lower in silicon liner material than acrylic liner material. Maximum surface roughness was noted by Polident followed by Efferdent Plus and Water for both acrylic liner group and silicon liner group.