Simulated effect of the Galactic Cosmic Rays on the surface of Pluto&#8217;s dark-red region
Authors: Feniou César , Jovanovic Lora , Gautier Thomas , Carrasco Nathalie , Bourgalais Jérémy , Boduch Philippe , Rothard Hermann , Augé Basile , Schmitt Bernard , Fayolle Marie , Vuitton Véronique , Poch Olivier , Quirico Eric 
Published: October 2020

I. IntroductionOn Pluto, the largest object in the Kuiper Belt, the dark surface of Cthulhu seems to indicate the presence of photochemical aerosols, stemming from the interaction between solar ultraviolet radiation and atmospheric methane, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, and further sedimentation [1-4]. Tholins have been tested and identified as analogues of the said surface. The flyby of the New Horizons Pluto probe enabled reflectance spectra acquisitions of the Cthulhu region. Dissimilarities were found with the reflectance of Pluto tholins, which might be due to Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR) irradiation of Pluto&#8217;s surface [5]. To test this hypothesis, Pluto tholins were synthesized and swift heavy ion irradiation was performed on the analogues to simulate the impact of cosmic rays on the surface of Cthulhu region. Moreover, GCR-analogues irradiation of the said tholins triggers a desorption of organic volatile compounds whose study could provide crucial information on both the structure of tholins and the chemical mechanisms involved. The volatile desorption was followed by mass spectrometry.II. MethodsThe tholins samples were produced within the PAMPRE experiment (LATMOS, France) using a N2:CH4 (99:1) and CO (500 ppm) gaseous mixture submitted to a plasma discharge [6]. The operating conditions were 0.9 &#177; 0.1 mbar total pressure and ambient temperature. The tholins samples were deposited as thin film onto a polished MgF2 substrate.The irradiation experiments were performed at the heavy ion accelerator GANIL (Caen, France) using the IGLIAS experimental setup [7] at ambient temperature with a beam flux of 109 Xe ions cm&#8722;2 s&#8722;1. Mass spectrometry measurements were performed using a quadrupole mass-spectrometer operating with electron ionization (EI) at 70 eV and a scan range from m/z 1 to 100 before and during the irradiation. Mass spectrometry was normalized to the signal of water (m/z 18) because it is the most intense peak and it is not affected by the irradiation. The error bars represent Type B uncertainties relating to measurement.A Monte-Carlo approach [8] was used to decompose the mass spectrum. Fragmentation data under EI 70 eV of 118 molecules were collected from the NIST Chemistry WebBook. The database was then narrowed by removing the molecules whose parent peak does not coincide with a signal on the experimental spectrum. The Monte-Carlo algorithm then managed to fit the fragmentation patterns of the dabatase compounds with the experimental spectrum. The deconvolution was performed 100,000 times to obtain a statistical distribution and the calculation uncertainties were plotted.III. ResultsThe mass spectrometry analysis (Fig. 1) shows a notable increase in intensity for many peaks of the C1 and C2 groups under irradiation. For higher m/z, most peaks only appear at a significant intensity when the tholins are irradiated. No signal was detected over m/z 53 in either experiment.The deconvolution (Fig. 2) permitted identification of the volatiles released. First, we report a clear increase in desorption of nitriles and unsaturated hydrocarbons under heavy ion irradiation. When the tholins were irradiated, hydrogen cyanide production was 20 times higher and it is observed that cyanogen and propiolonitrile formation and fragmentation shaped the significant C4-group signals (m/z 50, 51, 52). Allene and acetylene production also appeared under irradiation. Second, the Monte-Carlo calculation did not manage to fit the database&#8217;s compounds to the experimental results for m/z 12, 26, 29, 36, 38. These signals are thought to be fragments from secondary reactions, fragments being C+, CN+, N2H+, C3+, C2N+ respectively [9,10], but may also be fragments of a molecule from outside our database. For instance, methanimine (m/z 29) is a credible candidate [11] but no EI fragmentation data is available.IV. Discussion and conclusionThe interaction of cosmic rays&#8217; analogues with N2-rich ices inside icy bodies in the outer Solar System already shown a production of a few different species (HCN, CN&#8722;, NH3&#8230;) [12-14]. The identification of the desorbed species has shown that the chemical families of volatiles follow a similar trend under pyrolysis [15]. Herein, we reported that GCRs are likely to create diversity in desorbed volatiles from the organic surface of Pluto. Consequently, the atmosphere might contain new molecules. Their abundance is however a pending issue, and the determination of the production yield of these new species requires further investigation of the experimental data. Investigations are ongoing to test if the modifications induced by the GCRs could explain the optical differences found between the organic deposits observed on Pluto and the tholins produced in the laboratory.References[1] Stern S. A. et al., Science, Vol. 350, aad1815, 2015.[2] Gladstone G. R. et al., Science, Vol. 351, aad8866, 2016.[3] Grundy W. M. et al., Icarus, Vol. 314, pp. 232-245, 2018.[4] Cruikshank D. P. et al., Icarus, Vol. 246, pp. 82-92, 2015.[5] Fayolle M. et al., EPSC-DPS 2019, Testing tholins as analogs of the dark reddish material covering the Cthulhu region[6] Szopa C. et al., Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 54, pp. 394-404, 2006.[7] Aug&#233; B. et al., Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 89, 075105, 2018.[8] Gautier T. et al., Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2019.[9] Bohme D. K. et al., Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes, Vol. 81, pp. 123-145, 1987.[10] Carrasco N. et al., Icarus, Vol. 2019, pp. 230&#8211;240, 2012.[11] Bourgalais J. et al., JGR Space Physics, 2019, 10.1029/2019JA026953.[12] Aug&#233; B. et al., Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, 592, A99, 2016.[13] Vasconcelos F. A. et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 19, 1284, 2017.[14] Vasconcelos F. A. et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 19(35), 24154&#8211;24165, 2017.[15] He J. et al., Icarus, Vol. 248, pp. 205&#8211;212, 2015.