Rationale for choosing a spacer at the first treatment stage for late deep periprosthetic knee joint infection
Authors:   Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, Linnik S.A. , Afinogenova A.G. ,   Saint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, finogenov G.E. ,   Saint Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, Spiridonova A.A. ,   Saint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, Tsololo Ya.B. ,   Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, Karagezov G. ,   Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, Khaidarov V.M. ,   Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, Kravtsov D.V. ,   Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, Kucheev I.O. ,   Hospital for war veterans, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, Khromov A.A. ,   Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, Abbas I. ,   Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, Maryshev M.V. ,   Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Published: April 2023

Background Periprosthetic infection develops in 0.5 to 5.0 % of cases after knee replacement, which is a social and economic problem. The most common causes of periprosthetic infection are methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (36 %), gram-negative bacteria, and microbial associations. The study was aimed at improving the results of the sanitizing stage of revision arthroplasty in patients with periprosthetic infection of the knee joint by a developed long-acting antimicrobial composition and improving the designs of articulating spacers of the knee joint. Materials and Methods The treatment results of 121 patients with knee joint periprosthetic infection were analyzed. Nine patients had an early periprosthetic infection and 112 had a late one. Patients in satisfactory condition with stable implant components who had early periprosthetic infection underwent surgical treatment of the purulent focuses, replacement of a polyethylene tibial insert, thorough surgical wound washing using pulse lavage, drainage, and VAC-therapy. Patients with late periprosthetic infection were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the spacer used. An articulating spacer based on the developed antimicrobial composition of prolonged action (RU 191236 patent) was used in 59 patients of the first group. Preformed spacers were implanted in 29 patients of the second group, and 18 patients of the third group got a block-shaped spacer. Results An antibacterial anti-adhesive non-toxic composition with a prolonged action based on bone cement with gentamicin and such antiseptics as poviargol, dioxydine, and high-molecular polyvinylpyrrolidone has been developed. All the patients underwent the sanitizing stage of revision arthroplasty, implant removal, and spacer installation. Periprosthetic infection recurrence developed in 3 patients of the first group, 9 patients of the second group and 7 patients of the third one. The average time from the sanitizing stage to the second final stage of revision was 3-6 (4.8 ± 1.9) months. Discussion According to scientific data, the impregnation of new antibiotics into bone cement with gentamicin does not improve the antimicrobial effect of a spacer, especially in case of antibiotic-resistant strains. Block-shaped and preformed spacers lead to infection recurrence and complications. Antiseptic impregnation with different mechanisms of action is able to affect antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and the polymer is able to prolong the effect. Conclusion The use of articulating spacers for the knee joint, which include an antimicrobial composition, allows preserving the function of the joint and reducing the number of infectious complications, which facilitates the final stage of revision arthroplasty.