Laser doppler derived peripheral perfusion can distinguish haemodynamically tolerated VT from haemodynamically compromised VT
Authors: Miyazawa A , Arnold A , Keene D , Shun-Shin MJ , Howard JP , Jelf D , Bangi S , Peters NS , Lefroy D , Lim PB , Ng FS , Linton N , Kanagaratnam P , Francis DP , Whinnett ZI 
Published: May 2021

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre

Introduction

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs) cannot distinguish between ventricular tachycardia (VT) with haemodynamic compromise from haemodynamically tolerated VT to ensure that therapies are delivered only when necessary. Currently, unnecessary therapies are reduced by longer duration thresholds and higher rate thresholds. This can result in ICDs withholding or delaying therapies during haemodynamically compromising VT while potentially still providing therapies during rapid or prolonged VT that is haemodynamically well tolerated.

Laser doppler perfusion monitoring (LDPM) allows assessment of peripheral blood flow as a surrogate for haemodynamic status. We have previously demonstrated that laser doppler perfusion signals, analysed using an electro-mechanical coupling algorithm (SafeShock), can reliably identify loss of perfusion during ventricular fibrillation (VF), as well as discriminate VF from simulated lead fractures and T wave over-sensing. The utility of LDPM signals in VT, however, has not been established.

Purpose

In this study we assessed the utility of LDPM using the SafeShock algorithm to discriminate haemodynamically tolerated VT from VT with haemodynamic compromise.

Methods

Recruited participants underwent a rapid ventricular pacing protocol to simulate VT at different rates. Pacing was performed using the right ventricular lead of an implanted pacing device or a temporary pacing wire in the right ventricular apex. 3-lead ECG, blood pressure (either invasively using a radial artery catheter or non-invasively using beat-by-beat finometry) and LDPM signal were continuously recorded during the protocol. LDPM signals during simulated VT were analysed using the SafeShock electro-mechanical algorithm and compared to blood pressure change from baseline intrinsic rhythm to simulated VT.

Results

We obtained 588 recordings of simulated VT in 56 patients at rates of 100 bpm, 120 bpm, 140 bpm, 160 bpm, 180 bpm and 200 bpm. Percentage change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to VT correlated with LDPM-derived perfusion value during VT (Spearman’s Rho = 0.7786, p &lt; 0.0001).

Using a cut-off of 5 units, perfusion value predicted a 20% drop in systolic blood pressure in VT with an accuracy of 89.4% (sensitivity 94.8%, specificity 83.6%, p value &lt;0.0001).

Conclusions

Peripheral perfusion measurements, analysed using an electro-mechanical algorithm, can accurately discriminate haemodynamically tolerated VT from VT with haemodynamic compromise. ICDs with integrated LDPM sensors and algorithms could make therapy decisions based on the circulatory status of patients with arrhythmias not just rate and duration parameters. This could reduce unnecessary therapies while facilitating prompt treatment of compromising arrhythmias. Abstract Figure 1