Abstract A101: The MetAction trial: long-lasting responses to molecularly matched therapy in end-stage cancer
Authors: Ree Anne Hansen , Flatmark Kjersti , Nygaard Vigdis , Heinrich Daniel , Boye Kjetil , Dueland Svein , Nygaard Vegard , Hovig Eivind , Beiske Klaus , Lund-Iversen Marius , Flørenes Vivi A. , Johansen Christin , Bergheim Inger Riise , Sathermugathevan Menaka , Nakken Sigve , Geitvik Gry A. , Lingjærde Ole C. , Børresen-Dale Anne-Lise , Russnes Hege G. , Mælandsmo Gunhild M. 
Published: August 2018

Background: The first phase of the MetAction trial established the required diagnostic infrastructure, implemented security-approved systems for handling of sensitive information, educated the Trial Team within the context of tumor boards, and estimated costs of the initiative within public health services. The endeavor enabled expedited and safe mutation profiling of metastatic tumors in order to offer molecularly matched medication for end-stage cancer (Ree et al., ESMO Open 2017;2:e000158). The aim of the second trial phase was to investigate the utility of the MetAction pipeline in clinical practice. Procedures: An eligible patient with end-stage metastatic disease from any origin had been on the previous line of systemic therapy for 6 or more weeks with radiologic evaluation intervals of 6-12 weeks and disease progression according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Biopsy-sampled metastatic tissue was analyzed by DNA sequencing (Ion Oncomine™ Comprehensive Panel), where called variants were filtered prior to assessment and prioritization, supplemented with fluorescence in situ hybridization to cover relevant biomarkers. The Molecular Tumor Board interpreted the findings within the likelihood of signaling pathway activity, for the sequential Clinical Tumor Board to conclude on potential systemic tumor-directed medication. On study therapy, radiologic work-up was performed every 8 weeks. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) on study treatment, termed Period-B, with PFS for the most recent therapy, termed Period-A. If Period-B/Period-A was ≥1.3, the study therapy was deemed to be of benefit. The incidence of diagnostic adverse events and treatment-related grade 3-5 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) toxicities was secondary end points. Results: 26 patients were enrolled. Biopsy procedures were undertaken at lung or pleural sites (6 cases), liver or peritoneal sites (19 cases), and an inguinal lymph node (1 case), and did not cause adverse events. Histologic entities were 18 adenocarcinomas (AC), 2 undifferentiated carcinomas, 1 case each of cholangiocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, and 4 different sarcoma entities. 13 patients were found eligible for off-label use of molecularly matched therapy (inhibitor of ALK-, BRAF-, EGFR-, FGFR-, mTOR-, PARP-, ROS1-, or PD-1-mediated signaling). Among the 10 individuals who received study treatment until radiologic evaluation, 5 met the primary end point. The patient with cholangiocarcinoma and a patient with rectal AC primaries, both given crizotinib, obtained Period-B/Period-A outcome slightly better than 1.3. Notably, 3 patients with colon AC primaries, receiving either a combination of panitumumab with vemurafenib or chemotherapy or single-agent pembrolizumab, obtained long-lasting responses. In addition, 1 colon AC patient receiving pembrolizumab with RECIST progression (i.e., primary end point failure) before a long-lasting response to off-protocol continuation, reported CTCAE grade 3 toxicity (a colitis event that immediately resolved on high-dose prednisolone). Conclusion: MetAction procedures and treatments were safe. 15% (4/26) of patients with progressing end-stage cancer had the disease course substantially reversed by this biomarker-directed therapy approach.

Citation Format: Anne Hansen Ree, Kjersti Flatmark, Vigdis Nygaard, Daniel Heinrich, Kjetil Boye, Svein Dueland, Vegard Nygaard, Eivind Hovig, Klaus Beiske, Marius Lund-Iversen, Vivi A. Flørenes, Christin Johansen, Inger Riise Bergheim, Menaka Sathermugathevan, Sigve Nakken, Gry A. Geitvik, Ole C. Lingjærde, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Hege G. Russnes, Gunhild M. Mælandsmo. The MetAction trial: long-lasting responses to molecularly matched therapy in end-stage cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A101.