Abstract A05: The tumor suppressor function of Plk2 in triple-negative breast cancer may be mediated through regulation of Plk1
Authors: Acosta Deanna , Villegas Elizabeth , Kabotyanski Elena , Montemayor Celina , Kurley Sarah J. , Dominguez-Vidana Rocio , Shaw Chad A. , Westbrook Thomas F. , Rosen Jeffrey M. 
Published: May 2016

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are highly aggressive, associated with poor prognosis and lack targeted therapies. Current breast cancer therapies target the estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and human epidermal growth factor (HER2) receptors, which are absent in TNBCs. Developing new treatment strategies for TNBCs requires a better understanding of the signaling networks regulating TNBCs. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is a putative oncogene in TNBC. Plk1 is frequently overexpressed and promotes mitotic cell division, making it an attractive target for cancer therapy. Several inhibitors of Plk1 exist, one of which has accelerated to phase III clinical trials for acute myeloid leukemia. However, these drugs also inhibit Plk2, another polo-like kinase family member. The impact that the presence of Plk2 has on the effectiveness of Plk1 inhibitors as a cancer therapy is unknown.

We reported recently that a loss of Plk2 in the developing mammary gland results in increased proliferation, hyperbranching, misoriented mitotic spindle assembly and defects in polarity (Villegas et al Development 2015). Loss of Plk2 was accompanied by increased expression of Plk1. Genetic rescue experiments, knocking down Plk1 in Plk2 null mouse mammary epithelium, and bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays, using wildtype Plk2 and a kinase dead mutant (KD) of Plk2 as bait, revealed that Plk2 regulates these processes through its direct interaction with Plk1. Our preliminary data suggest that loss of Plk2 results in increased Plk1 protein but not RNA expression. We propose that Plk2 functions as a tumor suppressor by decreasing Plk1 stability in TNBCs. Loss of Plk2, therefore, may sensitize tumors to treatment with Plk1 inhibitors if these tumors display Plk1 oncogene addiction. We hypothesize that Plk2, through targeted degradation of Plk1, inhibits tumorigenesis in TNBC.

We observed that loss of Plk2 alone is not sufficient to generate mouse mammary tumors, however more lesions form after multiple pregnancies in Plk2 null glands than wildtype. To examine the tumor suppressor function of Plk2 through its regulation of Plk1 in TNBC, we are generating preclinical mouse mammary tumor models integrating the germline loss of Plk2 with p53 loss or c-Myc overexpression frequently observed in TNBC. Finally, to investigate the clinical relevance of Plk2 in TNBC, we will use available tissue microarrays of TNBC patient derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models to identify those that exhibit loss of Plk2. We will treat the identified PDX models with Plk1 inhibitors to confirm that Plk2 loss promotes Plk1 in human TNBC samples. With these studies, we expect to find that Plk2 is involved in the targeted degradation of Plk1 in TNBC, sensitizing this aggressive breast cancer subtype to treatment with Plk1 inhibitors. The results of these studies should help validate whether Plk2 is a new biomarker for determining which patients will benefit from Plk1 targeted TNBC treatment. Supported by Susan G. Komen Foundation grant SAC110031.

Citation Format: Deanna Acosta, Elizabeth Villegas, Elena Kabotyanski, Celina Montemayor, Sarah J. Kurley, Rocio Dominguez-Vidana, Chad A. Shaw, Thomas F. Westbrook, Jeffrey M. Rosen. The tumor suppressor function of Plk2 in triple-negative breast cancer may be mediated through regulation of Plk1. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Breast Cancer Research; Oct 17-20, 2015; Bellevue, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2016;14(2_Suppl):Abstract nr A05.