The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics for Entanglement and Quantum Information: The New Revolution in Quantum Mechanics and Science
Authors: Penchev Vasil 
Published: March 2023

The paper discusses the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics for experiments of entanglement &ldquo;establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science&rdquo; in a much wider, including philosophical context legitimizing by the authority of the Nobel Prize a new scientific area out of &ldquo;classical&rdquo; quantum mechanics relevant to Pauli&rsquo;s &ldquo;particle&rdquo; paradigm of energy conservation and thus to the Standard model obeying it. One justifies the eventual future theory of quantum gravitation as belonging to the newly established quantum information science. Entanglement, involving non-Hermitian operators for its rigorous description, non-unitarity as well as nonlocal and superluminal physical signals &ldquo;spookily&rdquo; (by Einstein&rsquo;s flowery epithet) synchronizing and transferring some nonzero action at a distance, can be considered to be quantum gravity so that its local counterpart to be Einstein&rsquo;s gravitation according to general relativity therefore pioneering an alternative pathway to quantum gravitation different from the &ldquo;secondary quantization&rdquo; of the Standard model. So, the experiments of entanglement once they have been awarded by the Nobel Prize launch particularly the relevant theory of quantum gravitation grounded on &ldquo;quantum information science&rdquo; thus granted to be nonclassical quantum mechanics in the shared framework of the generalized quantum mechanics obeying rather quantum-information conservation than only energy conservation. The concept of &ldquo;dark phase&rdquo; of the universe naturally linked to the very well confirmed &ldquo;dark matter&rdquo; and &ldquo;dark energy&rdquo; and opposed to its &ldquo;light phase&rdquo; inherent to classical quantum mechanics and the Standard model obeys quantum-information conservation, after which reversible causality or the mutual transformation of energy and information are valid. The mythical Big Bang after which energy conservation holds universally is to be replaced by an omnipresent and omnitemporal medium of decoherence of the dark and nonlocal phase into the light and local phase. The former is only an integral image of the latter and borrowed in fact rather from religion than from science. Physical, methodological and proper philosophical conclusions follow from that paradigm shift heralded by the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics. For example, the scientific theory of thinking should originate from the dark phase of the universe, as well: probably only approximately modeled by neural networks physically belonging to the light phase thoroughly. A few crucial philosophical sequences follow from the break of Pauli&rsquo;s paradigm: (1) the establishment of the &ldquo;dark&rdquo; phase of the universe as opposed to its &ldquo;light&rdquo; phase, only to which the Cartesian dichotomy of &ldquo;body&rdquo; and &ldquo;mind&rdquo; is valid; (2) quantum information conservation as relevant to the dark phase, furthermore generalizing energy conservation as to its light phase, productively allowing for physical entities to appear &ldquo;ex nihilo&rdquo;, i.e., from the dark phase, in which energy and time are yet inseparable from each other; (3) reversible causality as inherent to the dark phase; (4) the interpretation of gravitation only mathematically: as an interpretation of the incompleteness of finiteness to infinity, for example, following the G&ouml;del dichotomy (&ldquo;either contradiction or incompleteness&rdquo;) about the relation of arithmetic to set theory; (5) the restriction of the concept of hierarchy only to the light phase; (6) the commensurability of both physical extremes of a quantum and the universe as a whole in the dark phase obeying quantum information conservation and akin to Nicholas of Cusa&rsquo;s philosophical and theological worldview.