bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025 huggingface dataset:
Changes in outpatient antibiotic prescriptions by U.S. physicians and advanced practice providers, 2011 and 2022
Authors: Ali Mohsin , Sanchez Guillermo , Gouin Katryna , Hersh Adam , Kabbani Sarah
Published: September 2024

Background: The number of advanced practice providers (APPs)—nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs)—continues to expand across the United States. Several studies suggest differences in antibiotic prescribing rates and appropriateness by APPs compared to physicians. The objective of this analysis is to characterize population- and provider-specific outpatient antibiotic prescribing rates among physicians and APPs nationally, by state, and within urban versus rural counties. Methods: We estimated outpatient oral antibiotic prescription rates for 2011 and 2022 using county-level prescription dispensing data from IQVIA Xponent® (numerator) and population census estimates (denominator). Provider specialty denominators were provided by IQVIA, based on data from the American Medical Association. Counties were classified as urban or rural per the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics classification. National and state-level prescription volume, rates per 1000 population, and average number of prescriptions per provider were calculated for physicians, NPs, and PAs. We assessed the degree to which provider-specific rates explained the variance of the overall rate by state, using the coefficient of determination (r2) from Pearson’s correlation. Results: Between 2011 and 2022, overall U.S. antibiotic prescribing declined from 877 to 709 per 1000 population, a 19.2% relative reduction. The provider-specific proportion of the overall prescribing rate relatively decreased by 32% for physicians but increased by 157% for APPs (NPs 229%, PAs 86%; Figure 1). State-level antibiotic prescribing rates varied by provider type for both years, shifting towards proportionally greater APP prescribing in 2022 (Figure 2). For 2011 and 2022, physician prescribing rate strongly correlated with the overall state rate (r2 = 0.83 in 2011 versus 0.80 in 2022), whereas the correlation of the NP prescribing rate increased (r2 = 0.20 in 2011 versus 0.76 in 2022). A total of 60,327 (7.2%) physicians practiced in rural settings in contrast to 42,876 (12%) NPs and 14,495 (9.4%) PAs in 2022. Providers in rural counties prescribed more antibiotics per provider on average compared to urban counties; rural physicians prescribed 57% more antibiotics per provider (207 vs 132 antibiotics per provider), rural NPs prescribed 115% more (284 vs 132), and rural PAs prescribed 53% more (289 vs 189). Conclusions: The relative contribution of APPs to outpatient antibiotic prescriptions more than doubled over the past decade, accounting for 1 in 3 prescriptions in 2022. This contribution was especially prominent among NPs in rural counties. Further evaluation of antibiotic prescribing appropriateness among APPs and integration of APPs into antibiotic stewardship efforts in various settings.
A novel risk-adjusted metric to compare hospitals on their antibiotic-prescribing at hospital discharge
Authors: Livorsi Daniel , Merchant Jamie , Cho Hyunkeun , Goetz Matthew , Alexander Bruce , Beck Brice , Goto Michi
Published: September 2024

Background: Approximately 40% of all antibiotics related to an acute-care hospital stay are prescribed at the time of hospital discharge. However, there is no metric to compare hospitals on their antibiotic-prescribing at this transition of care. In this study, we sought to build a risk-adjusted metric for comparing hospitals on their overall post-discharge antibiotic use. Methods: This was a retrospective study across all acute-care admissions within the Veterans Health Administration during 2018-2021. For patients discharged to home or self-care, data on antibiotics administered while inpatient and those prescribed at discharge were collected. To predict post-discharge antibiotic use (days of therapy, DOT), we built a zero-inflated negative binomial model with a random intercept for each VA medical center. Data were split into training and testing sets to measure model performance and absolute error. Covariates included patient demographics, medical specialty at discharge, comorbidities, discharge diagnoses of infection, and the length of inpatient antibiotic therapy. Outliers, defined as DOT ≥ 30, were excluded, and the predicted random intercept was used to determine hospital performance. To compare hospitals with a positive versus negative random intercept in our model (i.e. higher vs. lower than expected overall post-discharge use, respectively), we calculated mean total antibiotic duration (inpatient + post-discharge) for two uncomplicated infection types: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Results: 1,804,400 patients were discharged to home or self-care across 130 hospitals. The mean age was 67.8 (SD 12.9), and 93.7% were male. Antibiotics were prescribed to 41.5% while hospitalized and 19.5% at discharge. The median number of post-discharge DOT among those prescribed post-discharge antibiotics was 7 (IQR 4-12). The predictive model detected post-discharge antibiotic use with fidelity, including accurate identification of any post-discharge antibiotic exposure (area under the precision-recall curve=0.97 ) and reliable prediction of the number of post-discharge DOT in those who were exposed (mean absolute error = 1.65; Figure 1). At negative versus positive random intercept hospitals (Figure 2), antibiotic duration for CAP and SSTIs was 7.3 versus 8.1 days (p < 0 .001) and 9.4 vs. 10.2 days (p < 0 .001), respectively. Conclusion: A model using electronically available data was able to accurately predict antibiotic use prescribed at hospital discharge. Hospitals with lower than expected overall post-discharge antibiotic use also prescribed shorter courses of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated cases of CAP and SSTI, which may reflect more robust processes at these sites to reduce antibiotic overuse at discharge.

Disclosure: Michi Goto: Contracted Research – Merck
Antibiotic Prescribing by General Dentists in the Outpatient Setting — United States, 2018–2022
Authors: Huynh Cam-Van , Gouin Katryna , Kabbani Sarah , Hicks Lauri , Neuburger Michele , McDonald Emily
Published: September 2024

Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use impacts patient safety and antimicrobial resistance patterns. In 2013, general dentists in the U.S. prescribed nearly 10% of all outpatient oral antibiotics (24.5 million prescriptions). The American Dental Association (ADA) published guidelines in 2019 recommending limited antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of dental pain and swelling. We characterized dental prescribing during 2018–2022 to assess whether antibiotic use decreased after the guideline’s release. In addition, we examined access to dental care. Methods: All antibiotic prescriptions dispensed during 2018–2022 were extracted from the IQVIA Xponent database, which captured ≥92% of all U.S. outpatient prescriptions and projected to 100% coverage. Prescriptions by general dentists were compared to total outpatient oral antibiotic prescriptions and summarized by patient sex, patient age, and prescriber geographic region. Census denominators were used to calculate prescribing rates per 1,000 persons. IQVIA general dentist counts were used to calculate dentists per 100,000 persons. Results: General dentists prescribed 24.7 million antibiotic prescriptions in 2018 (75 prescriptions per 1,000 persons) compared with 25.2 million (76 prescriptions per 1,000 persons) in 2022. During 2020–2022, general dentists prescribed >10% of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions (range 10.7%–12.1%). In each year, prescription rates were higher for females, patients > 65 years, and among prescribers in the Northeast. In 2022, there were 58 general dentists per 100,000 persons in the United States. The highest general dentist rate was in District of Columbia (100 per 100,000 persons) and the lowest rate was in Delaware (41 per 100,000 persons). Conclusions: Despite the ADA’s 2019 guidelines, prescribing by general dentists remained stable during 2018–2022. Because the total number of antibiotic prescriptions overall decreased, general dentists’ share of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions increased to >10% in recent years. Rate variation by patient characteristics and prescriber region may reflect differences in dental disease burden or may represent unnecessary antibiotic use. Dental antibiotic stewardship is needed, including dissemination and implementation of current prescribing guidelines. Further evaluation of prescribing indications and access to dental care is needed to inform dental stewardship priorities.
Impact and Safety of Diagnostic Stewardship to Improve Urine Culture Testing Among Patients with Indwelling Urinary Catheters
Authors: Sansom Sarah , Goldstein Audrey , Lin Michael , Schoeny Michael , Kniuksta Ruth , Seguin Alexandra , Tomich Alexander , Stein Brian , Segreti John
Published: September 2024

Background: Indiscriminate urine culturing of patients with indwelling urinary catheters may lead to overdiagnosis of urinary tract infections, resulting in unnecessary antibiotic treatment and inaccurate reporting of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) as a hospital quality metric. We evaluated the impact of a computerized diagnostic stewardship intervention to improve urine culture testing among patients with indwelling urinary catheters. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective observational study at Rush University Medical Center from April 2018 – July 2023. In February 2021, we implemented a computerized clinical decision support tool to promote adherence to our internal urine culture guidelines for patients with indwelling urinary catheters. Providers were required to select one guideline criteria: 1) neutropenia, 2) kidney transplant, 3) recent urologic procedure, 4) urinary tract obstruction; or if none of the criteria were met, then an infectious diseases consultation was required for approval. We compared facility-wide CAUTI rate per 10,000 catheter days and standardized infection ratio (SIR) during baseline and intervention periods using ecologic models, controlling for time and for monthly Covid-19 hospitalizations. In the intervention period, we evaluated how providers responded to the intervention. Potential harm was defined as collection of a urine culture within 7 days of the intervention that resulted in a change in clinical management. Results: In unadjusted models, CAUTI rate decreased from 12.5 to 7.6 per 10,000 catheter days (p=0.04) and SIR decreased from 0.77 to 0.49 (p=0.09) during baseline vs intervention periods. In adjusted models, the CAUTI rate decreased from 6.9 to 5.5 per 10,000 catheter days (p=0.60) (Figure 1) and SIR decreased from 0.41 to 0.35 (p=0.65) during baseline vs intervention periods. Urine catheter standard utilization ratio (SUR) did not change (p=0.36). There were 598 patient encounters with ≥1 intervention. Selecting the first intervention for each encounter, 284 (47.5%) urine cultures met our guidelines for testing and 314 (52.5%) were averted (Figure 2). Of these, only 3 ( < 1 %) had a urine culture collected in the subsequent 7 days that resulted in change in clinical management. Conclusion: We observed a trend of decreased CAUTIs over time, but effect of our diagnostic stewardship intervention was difficult to assess due to healthcare disruption caused by Covid-19. Adverse outcomes were rare among patients who had a urine culture averted. A computerized clinical decision support tool may be safe and effective as part of a multimodal program to reduce unnecessary urine cultures in patients with indwelling urinary catheters.
Perspectives and Awareness of Environmental Sustainability in the Infection Prevention and Control Community Nationally
Authors: Pearl Abarna , Pepe Dana , Mehrotra Preeti
Published: September 2024

Background: Healthcare contributes significantly to waste production and greenhouse gas emissions. This became especially apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet there is modest recognition of this issue, particularly within decision-making in Infection Prevention and Control (IPC). The aim of our study was to gauge general knowledge and attitudes of hospital epidemiologists (HEs) and infection preventionists (IPs) around the intersection of environmental sustainability and IPC, and to identify related institutional practices. Methods: An online survey, composed of ten questions related to environmental sustainability in IPC, was created and emailed to members of the SHEA Research Network (SRN), a national consortium of healthcare facilities collaborating on IPC research, from August - October 2023. Survey answers were collated via Redcap© and descriptive results were obtained. Results: Forty-two individuals (33 HEs, 7 directors of IPC, and 2 IPs) from unique institutions completed the survey. Thirty (71.4%) were from academic medical centers, 5 (11.9%) were from VA medical centers and 7 (16.7%) were from community hospitals. Over half of participants correctly estimated the amount of waste and carbon emissions produced annually by the US healthcare system (6 million tons and 8.5% of national emissions, respectively). However, only 42.9% considered environmental sustainability concerns important or very important when making IPC decisions. Fifteen (34.9%) had an environmental sustainability committee at their institution and of these, 8 had an established relationship with the IPC department. The most common techniques to promote sustainability amongst institutions were water/energy conservation (59.5%), reusable personal protective equipment (52.4%) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification (47.6%). When asked which efforts they would support at their institution, 28.6% would eliminate the use of single-use endoscopes and one third would avoid use of ethylene oxide for sterilization. In deciding whether to support environmental sustainability measures, key considerations participants articulated were patient safety concerns, knowledge about effectiveness and costs, and administrative support. Conclusion: Although there is growing awareness around the contribution of the healthcare industry to carbon emissions and waste production, IPC professionals have not yet universally adopted measures to promote environmental sustainability. In our survey, many participants acknowledged the importance of balancing patient safety and sustainability concerns. Our study demonstrates the need for more research and education to inform decisions around environmentally sustainable efforts in IPC that also preserve patient safety. Additionally, professional and regulatory bodies must acknowledge and promote the importance of environmental sustainability in IPC decision-making.
Two Novel Antibiotic Use Metrics for Facilities and Individual Prescribers in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Settings
Authors: Song Sunah , Wilson Brigid , Bej Taissa , Kowal Corinne , Perez Federico , Nace David , Jump Robin
Published: September 2024

Background: Measuring and reporting antibiotic use are essential to antimicrobial stewardship activities. The most common metric to assess facility-level use is days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 days of care (DOT/1000 DOC). This metric may be difficult to calculate, not be readily comparable, or not provide actionable data to individual prescribers, particularly those that work in post-acute and long-term care (PALTC) settings. Here we use data from a centralized dispensing pharmacy to develop antibiotic use metrics suitable for offering individualized feedback to prescribers working in PALTC settings. Methods: We obtained medication dispensing data and resident census data for 13 PALTC settings within the same network. After omitting non-pharmacologic items and limiting the data to medications dispensed from 1/2020 – 12/2022, we determined the following metrics by month: days of antibiotic therapy (DOT), number of medications prescribed, number of antibiotic courses prescribed (antibiotic starts), and the number of individual residents issued a prescription for any medication (unique residents). These metrics were assessed for each facility (2020 – 2022) and for prescribers responsible for > 1% of prescriptions within that facility (2022 only). Prescriber-level unique residents was the number of residents issued a prescription by the given provider. We obtained facility-level census data to calculate antibiotic DOT/1000 resident days of care (DOC) as a standard to which we compared novel metrics. Results: During the 3-year study period, 1718 prescribers at 13 PALTC settings wrote for 672256 medications, including 31087 antibiotic courses. At the facility level, the correlation between monthly antibiotic starts (courses)/unique residents and antibiotic DOT/1000 DOC was 0.83 (p < 0 .0001). The correlation between monthly antibiotic DOT/unique residents and antibiotic DOT/1000 DOC was 0.98 (p < 0 .0001). Trends in monthly values of both novel metrics and DOT/1000 DOC were consistent across the examined period (Figure 1). For individual prescribers, both novel metrics permit assessment and comparison of antibiotic prescription rates over time (Figure 2). Conclusions: Pharmacy dispensing data can be used to determine antibiotic DOT/unique residents and antibiotic starts/unique residents at the facility level and for individual providers. The novel metric antibiotic DOT/unique residents demonstrated strong correlation with antibiotic DOT/1000 DOC at the facility level. In addition to supporting tracking and reporting of antibiotic use among PALTC settings, these new metrics permit visualization of the antibiotic prescribing rates of individuals prescribers, as well as peer comparison, which in turn can lead to actionable feedback that helps improve antibiotic use in the care of PALTC.
Investigation of Healthcare-Associated Infection Risks from Ice: Summary of CDC Consultations 2016-2023
Authors: Langerman Steven , Fazal Amara , Arduino Matthew , Perkins Kiran , Yount Christine
Published: September 2024

Background: Nonsterile ice is frequently used in healthcare settings for a wide array of patient care activities and clinical procedures. However, this ice can harbor pathogenic organisms which can threaten patient safety and cause outbreaks. We sought to characterize recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) consultations involving ice leading to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Methods: We reviewed internal CDC records from the Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion (DHQP) to identify investigations of outbreaks and potential outbreaks involving the use of ice in healthcare facilities. We searched records from January 1, 2016, through November 30, 2023, for keywords related to ice. We excluded consultations in which ice was not thought to be a potential transmission pathway as well as those in which only sterile ice products (e.g., saline slush) were investigated. Results: We identified 45 consultations for ice-related investigations, involving a total of 533 patients. Nontuberculous mycobacteria were the most frequently implicated organisms, appearing in 40% (n=18) of investigations. Eighty-four percent (n=38) of investigations occurred in acute care hospitals. The most frequently implicated hospital settings were intensive care units (13%, n=6), operating rooms (13%, n=6), and bronchoscopy suites (13%, n=6). We identified a variety of plausible exposure pathways, including direct ingestion of ice by patients, use of ice during the bronchoscopy procedure, use of nonsterile ice in heater-cooler devices during cardiothoracic surgery, and the use of ice to chill saline for respiratory care. Environmental sampling directly of ice machines was performed in 62% of investigations (n=28) and nonsterile ice from these machines was sampled in 9% of investigations (n=4). Among those investigations in which ice machines were sampled, the organism implicated in the outbreak was isolated in 54% of investigations (n=15). Among those investigations in which ice itself was sampled, the organism implicated in the outbreak was isolated in 75% of investigations (n=3). These organisms included Mycobacterium mucogenicum, Burkholderia multivorans, and Acanthamoeba spp. Conclusions: The use of nonsterile ice during clinical care is a potential source of pathogens that cause patient infections and HAI outbreaks. Healthcare personnel should be aware of the risk posed by nonsterile ice and consider avoiding its use, especially when caring for patients who are critically ill or immunocompromised. Healthcare facilities should ensure regular cleaning and disinfection of ice machines to decrease their microbial burden. When HAI outbreaks involving water-associated organisms are identified, nonsterile ice should be considered as a potential mode of transmission.
Bad Habits that Stick: An Investigation into Adhesive Medical Tape Use Practices and Beliefs
Authors: Fischer Julia , Haessler Sarah
Published: September 2024

Background: Medical tape is one of the most ubiquitous resources in the hospital. Although tape is advertised by manufacturers as a single patient-use item, half-used rolls are a common sight in hospitals. Tape is often manipulated by un-sanitized and ungloved hands and comes in close contact with patient skin. Medical tape has the potential to be a source of hospital-acquired infection as it has been documented to be colonized with pathogens ranging from MRSA to Rhizopus. Despite infection risk, currently the only clinical guidelines of tape use are outlined in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services guidance for Hemodialysis patients issued in 2008 that requires “tape should be dedicated to a single patient and discarded after use” as hemodialysis patients are at higher risk of infection. However, there is a lack of standards in the practice of tape use across hospital systems. Methods: To understand the current practices and beliefs of tape use at our institution, we developed a standardized survey to query individuals from various roles (RN, Physician, Patient Care Technicians, respiratory therapists, phlebotomists) across all patient care areas at a 746-bed academic, tertiary care center. Results: 52 units were surveyed, including 225 employees. Qualitative analysis revealed a wide variety of uses for medical tape for patient care, with venipuncture, securing IVs, and wound dressings being the most common. Only 1.4% of individuals reported single use of tape rolls. 54% of individuals reported tape use behaviors that carry an elevated risk for inoculation of pathogens. 70% of individuals reported that tape was discarded after the patient was discharged from their respective area. These practices did not change across procedure-heavy areas such as the Emergency Department or the Operating Rooms, in fact only 22% of individuals surveyed reported single use of tape in these areas. Beliefs about tape use varied: 95% of individuals agreed that a roll of tape could be used multiple times on a single patient, and 52% of individuals agreed that a roll of tape could be used on multiple patients. Conclusions: Tape use practices varied across hospital units, indicating the need for standardized policies for tape use and storage. Beliefs about tape not being a single-use item were consistent across the hospital and suggest that education and culture change efforts are needed to decrease the risk for hospital-acquired infections from improper medical tape use.
Can Artificial Intelligence Support Infection Prevention and Control Consultations?
Authors: Ross Natalie , Brust Karen , Kobayashi Takaaki , Abosi Oluchi , Salinas Jorge , Trannel Alexandra
Published: September 2024

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have demonstrated success in US medical licensing examinations; however, their utility in infection prevention and control (IPC) remains unknown. Methods: The program of hospital epidemiology handles consultation calls and records each question and answer. Using 2022 data, we selected 31 frequently asked questions. We utilized four AI tools, including Chat GPT-3.5 and 4.0, Bing AI, and OpenEvidence, to generate answers. We predefined scales (Table 1) to capture responses by three reviewers, including two hospital epidemiologists and one infection preventionist. The mean score of ≥ 3 and ≥ 4 was considered acceptable in accuracy and completeness, respectively. We reported the percentage of responses with acceptable accuracy and completeness out of assessed questions for each category. Results: Among 31 questions, 16 were associated with isolation duration, 9 with healthcare personnel (HCP) exposure, 4 with cleaning contaminated rooms, and 2 with patient exposure. Regarding accuracy, most AI tools performed worse in questions about isolation duration, ranging between 75% and 93.8%. All AI tools, except OpenEvidence, had a 100% accuracy rate for HCP and patient exposure. All AI tools had a 100% accuracy rate for contaminated room handling. The highest overall acceptable accuracy rate was observed in Chat GPT-3.5. Regarding completeness, most AI tools performed worse in questions about isolation duration, ranging between 44% and 75%. All AI tools, except OpenEvidence, had a 100% completeness rate for contaminated rooms and patient exposure. The highest overall acceptable completeness rate was observed in Bing AI (Table 2). Conclusions: All AI tools provided reasonable answers to commonly asked IPC-related questions, although, there were variations among different tools used. AI could be used to supplement the infection control program, especially if resources are limited.
Evaluation of minimum inhibitory concentration data in National Healthcare Safety Network’s Antimicrobial Resistance Option
Authors: Ali Mohsin , Webb Amy , Xue Luting , Wu Hsiu
Published: September 2024

Background: Clinical laboratories perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) primarily by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for an organism–antimicrobial combination and comparing it with established breakpoints to generate interpretations. The Antimicrobial Resistance (AR) Option of CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) permits hospitals to submit clinical isolate AST data, including test values and interpretations (Figure 1). The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) periodically revises breakpoints, but their adoption by clinical laboratories can be delayed, potentially affecting national AR surveillance data accuracy. Using MIC values, instead of clinical laboratory interpretations, can improve surveillance data accuracy and overcome misclassification due to delayed uptake of revised breakpoints. We evaluated the completeness and consistency of MIC data submitted to the AR Option for fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods: We included data on (1) E. coli isolates tested for ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin susceptibility and (2) S. aureus isolates tested for oxacillin or cefoxitin susceptibility in 2022 and reported by October 1, 2023. We evaluated completeness among isolates reporting a final AST interpretation as the proportion of isolates reporting both an MIC value and interpretation. We evaluated consistency using percent agreement comparing the laboratory’s MIC interpretation (classified as resistant or not resistant) with the interpretation derived by applying 2021 CLSI M100 breakpoints to the MIC values reported for the same isolate. Results: Across 974 hospitals, fluoroquinolone MICs and interpretations were reported for 172,012/393,359 E. coli isolates (43.7%), and oxacillin or cefoxitin MICs and interpretations were reported for 38,519/79,372 S. aureus isolates (48.5%). Of isolates with both MIC values and interpretations, 157,902 (91.8%) E. coli and 7,808(79.7%) S. aureus isolates had MICs that could be classified as resistant or non-resistant (i.e., intermediate or susceptible) per CLSI breakpoints (Figure 2). The remaining MICs were unclassifiable (reported as intervals spanning CLSI breakpoints, e.g., ≤1 μg/ml ciprofloxacin for E. coli). Among isolates with classifiable MICs, the agreement between the clinical laboratory and CLSI-based interpretation was 99.5% for E. coli and 99.7% for S. aureus. Conclusion: MIC values and interpretations were available for
FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel Impact on Antibiotic Usage in Patients with Suspected Community-Acquired Meningitis
Authors: Pathak Aaron , Pham Caitlynn , Shay Sabra , Lasco Todd , Al Mohajer Mayar
Published: September 2024

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures are commonly performed to evaluate patients with suspected bacterial meningitis. These cultures, however, can take up to 72 hours, leading to delays in antibiotic de-escalation and increased antimicrobial utilization. The turnaround for the BioFire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis(FA/ME) panel is less than an hour, which may facilitate early de-escalation. Our study aimed to assess whether the use of FA/ME panels in combination with CSF cultures could impact antimicrobial therapy compared to cultures alone in patients treated for suspected bacterial meningitis. Methods: Our retrospective study included patients from five hospitals in Texas (2017-2023) who received empiric antibiotics for suspected community-acquired meningitis and underwent a lumbar puncture within 96 hours of admission. Patients with ventricular drains, traumatic brain injury, and non-central nervous system infections were excluded. Cases comprised patients who had an FA/ME panel performed, while controls included patients without the panel. Outcomes were defined as the empiric duration of antimicrobial therapy (days) and total days of antibiotic therapy (DOT). Wilcoxon Rank Sum test and multiple linear regression models were applied to assess the relationship between the use of the FA/ME panel and study outcomes. Independent variables comprised demographics, institution type, acuity, clinical presentation, CSF values, and FA/ME panel use. Imputation was performed using multiple imputation by chained equations. Results: A total of 193 patients were included in our study. Seventy-one patients received the FA/ME panel (along with the CSF culture), while 122 patients received the CSF culture alone (controls). The median empiric duration of antibiotic therapy in the cases and controls were 1.71 days and 1.18 days, respectively (p = .160). The median DOT in the cases and controls were eight days and six days, respectively (p = .045). After adjusting for confounders, the FA/ME panel was not significantly associated with changes in the empiric duration of antibiotic therapy (B= 0.18, p = .669, Figure 1) or DOT (B= 1.28, p = .170, Figure 2).

Conclusion: Providing FA/ME panel testing without active antimicrobial stewardship interventions did not result in a change in antimicrobial prescribing patterns. The difference from prior literature could be explained by the smaller sample size, limiting the power of the study. Further prospective antimicrobial stewardship efforts should focus on training providers on interpreting FA/ME panel results and providing prospective audits and feedback.
Opportunity for Early De-escalation in Enterobacterales Bacteremia with Rapid Blood Culture Identification Technology
Authors: Deja Erin , Kim Jihye , Greenfield Adam , Lee Kimberly , Godwin Melissa , Bryson Alexandra , Sastry Sangeeta , Doern Christopher
Published: September 2024

Background: The BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) Panel is used to identify organisms present in positive blood cultures within hours of detection at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS). BCID2 is also able to detect common resistance mechanisms including CTX-M, the most common extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) in the United States, and several carbapenemases. The Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) at VCUHS established optimal treatment recommendations for each organism identified by BCID2 based on the detection of a resistance mechanism and local resistance patterns. The recommendation for the majority of Enterobacterales without a detected resistance mechanism is ceftriaxone. However, providers are often reluctant to de-escalate antibiotics without confirmed susceptibility testing, as there may be other mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative organisms. The objective of this evaluation was to measure the degree of congruence between BCID2 resistance mechanism detection and susceptibility testing by disk diffusion, and to validate the adequacy of the VCUHS ASP BCID2 treatment recommendations for Enterobacterales bacteremia. Methods: Patients with positive Enterobacterales BCID2 results from March 12 to June 19, 2023 were retrospectively identified. Organisms identified by BCID2 that were considered high-risk for clinically significant AmpC production due to an inducible AmpC gene (i.e., K. aerogenes, E. cloacae complex) were excluded. Results: A total of 270 results were included. The most commonly identified organism was E. coli (n = 139, 51.5%), followed by K. pneumoniae (n = 74, 27.4%). There were 27 (10%) isolates positive for CTX-M and 1 (0.4%) isolate positive for KPC. All CTX-M isolates were ceftriaxone resistant, and the KPC isolate was meropenem resistant. The remaining 242 isolates were negative for all resistance markers detected by BCID2. Of these, only 3 (1.2%) were resistant to ceftriaxone and notably, 8 (3.3%) were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam. Overall, BCID2 CTX-M detection was 90% sensitive and 100% specific for predicting ceftriaxone resistance in Enterobacterales. Conclusion: CTX-M detection by BCID2 is highly sensitive and specific for predicting ceftriaxone resistance in Enterobacterales. CTX-M negative isolates were more often susceptible to ceftriaxone than to piperacillin/tazobactam, which is commonly used as empiric therapy for Gram-negative organisms at our institution. This highlights an excellent opportunity for safe and effective early de-escalation of antibiotics for treatment of Enterobacterales bacteremia.
Antibiotic Prescribing Practices on Hospital Discharge for Management of Urinary Tract Infections: A Single Center Study
Authors: Erwes Thomas , Colaluca Melissa , Zulfi Ajshe , Wiskirchen Dora , Abrantes-Figueiredo Jessica
Published: September 2024

Background: Appropriate antibiotic use has been described as one of the key strategies in tackling antibiotic resistance. Although the majority of antimicrobial therapy is completed following discharge, there lacks clear guidance in addressing antibiotic stewardship in the outpatient setting. Particularly, broader coverage as well as longer durations of therapy are often encountered following hospitalization. In our study we examine the various antibiotic prescribing practices on hospital discharge for management of urinary tract infections (UTI). Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational chart review of patients discharged from St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center in Hartford between May and July 2022. Medical records were reviewed for patients who were prescribed antibiotic therapy for management of UTI and met inclusion criteria. Variables of interest included type of UTI treated, antibiotic used, duration of antibiotics during and following hospitalization, fluoroquinolone use, as well reported adverse events. Total duration of therapy was defined as days on susceptible antimicrobials with appropriate source control. Results: A total of 84 patients met inclusion criteria. 44 received treatment for simple UTI (sUTI) and 40 for complicated UTI (cUTI). Figure 1 shows the various organisms identified on culture. The most common antimicrobials prescribed on discharge were cefpodoxime and ciprofloxacin [figure 2]. Quinolones were prescribed in 11.4% of sUTIs and 39.1% of cUTIs on hospital discharge. Of those, only one patient had no alternative to quinolone use due to drug allergies. The mean duration of therapy for treatment of sUTI was 6.4 days total (SD 2.40) with 3.9 days outpatient (SD 1.78). The mean duration of therapy for treatment of cUTI was 10.9 days total (SD 3.62) with 6.7 days outpatient (SD 2.99). Comparison of mean durations is shown in figure 3. In 49% of all cases (including both sUTI and cUTI) patients received greater than 7 days of antimicrobial therapy. Conclusion: There is increased evidence favoring shorter courses of antimicrobial therapy for management of both simple and complicated UTIs. A 7-day course has been shown as effective duration of therapy for cUTI with appropriate source control, regardless of presence of bacteremia. Results from our single center-study show both sUTI and cUTI are subject to unnecessarily prolonged durations of therapy on hospital discharge. In addition we noted a significant use of fluoroquinolones in cUTI treatment. We believe stewardship interventions at time of discharge may particularly benefit shorter courses of therapy for cUTI as well as reduced quinolone use.
Antimicrobial Stewardship Practice Changes Following a Statewide Educational Conference in Nebraska
Authors: Preusker Jenna , Soma Mounica , Bergman Scott , Schroeder Danny , Tyner Kate , Van Schooneveld Trevor , Donahue Matthew , Salman Ashraf Muhammad , Teran Plasencia Juan
Published: September 2024

Background: In 2023, Nebraska held its 4th state antimicrobial stewardship (AS) educational conference, an annual one-day in-person event with continuing education offered for nurses, pharmacists, microbiology lab technicians, and physicians. One challenge of educational events is determining if content has been translated into practice. We sought to assess AS-related practice changes implemented by conference attendees. Methods: Conference attendees were sent 2 surveys by email following the conference. Survey 1 questions were integrated into the continuing education credit evaluation immediately following the conference. Survey 2 was sent three months later to all registered attendees. Qualitative responses were grouped by theme and descriptive statistics were used to evaluate Results: There were 203 attendees from across the state including a diverse group of learners (Table 1) representing metropolitan and rural areas of Nebraska (Figure 1) from acute care hospitals, critical access hospitals, long-term care settings, and public health. A total of 148 attendees (73%) answered questions in Survey 1 (Table 2), and 79 (39%) attendees responded to Survey 2. On Survey 1, 94% of respondents indicated that they intended to make practice changes, though 60% anticipated barriers including further staff training needs and lack of resources and health system support. On Survey 2, 83% of respondents indicated successful implementation of practice changes at three months after the conference. The most common practice changes included enhanced communication strategies, improved antibiotic tracking, monitoring, and review, policy and procedure updates, and AS tool implementation. On Survey 1, 26% (35/131) strongly agreed that their ability to treat patients was adequate prior to the conference; this increased to 55% (72/131) post-conference. On Survey 2, 56% (22/39) of respondents reported improvement in patient outcomes because of implemented practice changes following conference attendance. However, some also mentioned a short follow-up survey timeline as a limitation in assessing patient outcome improvements. Reported outcomes included improved receptiveness from providers, patients, and families to antibiotic use recommendations, shorter prescribed durations, and more appropriate initial antibiotic selection. Improved team performance was noted by 73% (27/37) of respondents. Themes included improved communication with internal and external stakeholders, more collaborative team discussions, increased confidence in recommendations, expanded provider and staff engagement, and increased leadership involvement. Conclusions: In addition to improved knowledge and understanding for a variety of AS-related areas, attendees of the conference also reported a high rate of practice changes that led to perceived improvements in patient outcomes and team function.
Long-term effect of intravenous antimicrobial use in a pharmacist-led ASP at a small Japanese acute care hospital
Authors: Tagashira Yasuaki , Sasaki Yasuhiro
Published: September 2024

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains a crucial, healthcare issue for which many countries have devised a national action plan. In Japan as well, antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) are being implemented in acute care hospitals under this policy framework. Clinical pharmacists play a central role in ASP, often jointly with infectious disease (ID) physicians. However, in Japan, a shortage of ID physicians has resulted in some ASP being led solely by pharmacists. While reports of the short-term effects of this situation are emerging, the long-term impact of pharmacist-led ASP is still largely unknown in Japan. The present study retrospectively examined the long-term effects of pharmacist-led ASP in a small, Japanese, acute care hospital. Method: The present study examined a pharmacist-led ASP in an acute care hospital (287 beds) in Japan which was launched in August 2015 and assessed the duration of therapy per 1000 patient-days (DOT) as the primary outcome by comparing the pre-intervention period (April 2013-July 2015) with the intervention period (August 2015-March 2023) using linear regression analysis. Additionally, segmented time-series analysis was conducted for each, additional intervention, and the impact of reduced activity due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic during the intervention. The DOT at the study center were compared with the national average of facilities implementing ASP. Result: While the DOT for all intravenous antimicrobials showed a slight increase on linear regression (r=0.01; P=0.1), the DOT of antipseudomonal intravenous antimicrobials significantly decreased (r=-0.027; P < 0 .01). Moreover, a significant reduction in DOT was observed immediately after the initiation of prospective review and feedback for carbapenems and daily prospective review and feedback for all intravenous antimicrobials (-3.2 and -2.4; P < 0 .001 for the intercept). An increase in DOT was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic-related reduction in activity time, and a rapid decline was observed upon the resumption of activities. Conversely, the average, nationwide DOT significantly increased for all intravenous antimicrobials as well as for antipseudomonal intravenous antimicrobials (r=0.02 and r=0.004; P < 0 .01) Conclusion: Sustaining an effective, pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program led to a continual decrease in the DOT of antipseudomonal intravenous antimicrobials in a small, Japanese, acute care hospital despite a nationwide increase in their use following implementation of the national AMR action plan. Detailed analysis of pharmacists’ activities across multiple facilities is necessary to verify these effects.
Guideline-unjustified inpatient therapy for non-ICU patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) at 105 Veterans Affairs
Authors: Goetz Matthew , Graber Christopher , Neuhauser Melinda , Jones Makoto
Published: September 2024

Background: CAP is often inappropriately treated with agents active against multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO; methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] and P. aeruginosa [PSA]) and for prolonged duration. We assessed the relationship between antibiotic use with ATS/IDSA guideline-unjustified empiric and definitive MDRO therapy and prolonged duration in non-ICU inpatients with CAP at 105 VA Medical Centers. Methods: From VA Corporate Data Warehouse data, we identified patients with discharge ICD-10-CM codes consistent with CAP from 1/2022-3/2023, excluding cases with 14 days of antibiotic therapy, ICU admission, concurrent infections, or severe immunocompromise. We considered as jultified empiric (≤third day of hospitalization) therapy: anti-MRSA therapy for patients with prior positive MRSA cultures, anti-PSA therapy for patients with prior positive PSA cultures, and both anti-MRSA & anti-PSA therapy in patients with severe pneumonia and intravenous antibiotics in the prior 3 months. Definitive (>third day of hospitalization) anti-MDRO therapy was considered unjustified in patients who had achieved clinical stability and whose cultures did not grow MRSA or PSA. Prolonged duration (>6 days of therapy) was unjustified if patients were clinically stable or discharged by day 5. Results: The median age of the 29,260 patients was 75 (IQR 69,81); 4.6% were women. While 33% and 22% of patients received empiric or definitive MDRO therapy, such therapy was jultified in 12% and 0.5%, respectively. Median facility use of empiric and definitive MDRO therapy was 31% (IQR 25%,38%) and 20% (15%,23%), respectively (Figure 1); this use was unjustified in 89% (85%,93%) and 100% (100%,100%), respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between MDRO therapy and rates of unjustified empiric and definitive MDRO therapy for CAP was 0.54 and 0.61, respectively (Figure 2). Although 99% of patients were discharged or stable by day 5, 42% received prolonged therapy. The median frequency of prolonged therapy was 39% (33%,48%); facility rates of prolonged therapy had a correlation of 0.56 with total antibiotic use and 0.46 with MDRO therapy (Figure 3). Discussion: Based on electronic documentation, we identified 1) substantial opportunities to reduce unjustified anti-MDRO therapy and the duration of therapy in hospitalized non-ICU patients with CAP; 2) a moderate correlation of unjustified anti-MDRO therapy with increased MDRO antibiotic use and of prolonged duration of therapy with increased total and MDRO antibiotic use. The correlation of lower quality prescribing with increased antibiotic use provides further impetus for tools such as dashboards (Figure 4) to assist antibiotic stewards in designing and monitoring interventions to reduce unjustified therapy.