P-710 COVID-19 Vaccination and Infertility Treatment Outcomes
Authors: Avraham S , Kedem A , Zur H , Youngster M , Yaakov O , Yerushalmi G , Gat I , Gidoni Y , Baum M , Hourvitz A , Maman E 
Published: June 2022

Study question

Is there an influence of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine on ovarian response and in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment outcomes?

Summary answer

COVID-19 mRNA vaccine did not affect the ovarian response nor pregnancy rates in IVF treatment

What is known already

Studies demonstrated that infection with COVID-19 during pregnancy increased the risk of the development of severe disease and pregnancy complications.

A recent meta-analysis of international data showed a declining tendency to be vaccinated, possibly influenced by public concerns over safety of the vaccines. Specifically, concerns were raised about a possible detrimental effect on fertility and pregnancy outcomes due to similarity between syncytin-1, a human placental fusion protein, and the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expressed after administration of the COVID-19 vaccine.

To date, only one retrospective analysis on 36 infertility patients has assessed the influence of COVID-19 vaccination on IVF treatment outcomes.

Study design, size, duration

A retrospective cohort study . The study included a total of 400 patients, 200 vaccinated women and 200 age matched non-vaccinated women, undergoing IVF treatments during January-April 2021.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

All vaccinated women aged 20-42 that underwent IVF treatment cycles between January 1, 2021 and April 31 2021 were included. All participants completed two doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine at least two weeks before starting ovarian stimulation. The study group was matched by age to non-vaccinated patients that underwent IVF treatments during the same period. Patients with a positive COVID 19 test in the past were excluded.

Main results and the role of chance

Two hundred patients underwent oocyte retrieval 14-68 days after receiving COVID-19 vaccination. No difference was found between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients in mean number of oocytes retrieved per cycle (10.63 vs 10.72, p = 0.93). Among 128 vaccinated patients and 133 non-vaccinated patients that underwent fresh embryos transfers, no difference was demonstrated in clinical pregnancy rates (32.8% vs. 33.1%, p-value=0.96), 42 and 44 pregnancies respectively. The fertilization rates and mean number of cryopreserved embryos were similar between the two groups in freeze all cycles (55.43% vs. 54.29%, p-value=0.73), (3.59 vs. 3.28, p-value=0.80). Among vaccinated patients and non-vaccinated patients that underwent fresh embryos transfers, no difference was demonstrated in the fertilization rate (64.81% vs. 61.98%, p = 0.51), and transferred embryos quality. Regression models applied demonstrated no effect of the vaccine on oocyte yields and pregnancy rates.

Limitations, reasons for caution

Limitations include retrospective nature and different treatment protocols.

Additional limitation is the lack of information about vaccination status of the partners. One would assume that if unbalanced, the proportion of vaccinated males would be higher in the study group as partners tend to choose similarly in regard to vaccine administration.

Wider implications of the findings

Women should consider vaccination prior to their attempts to conceive via IVF treatments.

Trial registration number

ASF-0094-21