Abstract 4704: Identification of melanoma mutational tumor heterogeneity using BRAF, NRAS and TERT-promoter mutation-detection assays
Authors: Chang Gregory , Corless Broderick , Fleming Nathaniel , Spittle Cindy , Darvishian Farbod , Pavlick Anna , Berman Russell , Shapiro Richard , Karlin-Neumann George , Osman Iman , Polsky David 
Published: August 2019

Purpose: The mutational spectra of melanoma has been well characterized; however, the presence of distinct subclones among multiple tumors from a given patient has been less well described. As mutational heterogeneity has been associated with decreased responses to treatments in other cancers, we sought to estimate the occurrence of distinct subclones within individual melanoma patients by analyzing commonly mutated melanoma genes using a multi-platform mutation-detection approach.

Methods: We analyzed 271 formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tumors from 99 patients with stage III or IV melanoma enrolled in the NYU Melanoma Biorepository. All patients had two or more available tumor specimens, and complete clinical data. All samples were reviewed for adequate tumor content, and extracted DNA was assessed for mutations at BRAFV600, NRASQ61, and TERT-124C&gt;T and TERT-146C&gt;T using a combination of multiplex SNaPshot assays, Sanger Sequencing, Allele-specific real-time PCR, or droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Samples undergoing ddPCR analysis for TERT mutations were treated with uracil-DNA glycolase prior to amplification to remove C&gt;T artifacts from formalin-fixation.

Results: Sixty patients had a primary plus one or more metastatic tumors available; 39 patients had multiple metastatic tumors, but no primary tumor available. Overall, 88% of patients had tumors with at least one BRAF, NRAS and/or TERT mutation. We identified inter-tumor mutational heterogeneity in 20/99 (20%) patients, with TERT mutational heterogeneity present in 15 of these patients. Among 14 patients with heterogeneity between their primary and metastatic tumors, 6/14 (43%) had additional mutations in their metastases compared to their primaries. Most interestingly, 8/14 (57%) patients had mutations in their primary that were undetectable in at least one of their metastases; 5 of these patients had TERT mutational heterogeneity. Three patients had a BRAF mutation in their primary that was undetectable in at least 1 of their metastases. One patient had a BRAFV600E/NRASWILD-TYPE/TERTWILD-TYPE primary on the leg and 3 regional metastases lacking BRAF mutations; but carrying NRASQ61K and TERT-124C&gt;T mutations. Another patient had 3 different metastatic tumors, with 3 different mutational spectra. We did not detect any tumors with simultaneous BRAF and NRAS mutations; however, we did detect both TERT-124C&gt;T and TERT-146C&gt;T mutations in 7 tumors from 7 individual patients. Four of these were primary tumors, and metastases from these patients lacked 1 of the 2 TERT mutations identified in the primary.

Conclusion: Clonal heterogeneity in melanoma is fairly common as evidenced by divergent detection of TERT, BRAF and NRAS mutations using high sensitivity multi-platform mutation detection analyses of multiple melanoma tumors from individual patients. Heterogeneity appears to occur in primary tumors.

Citation Format: Gregory Chang, Broderick Corless, Nathaniel Fleming, Cindy Spittle, Farbod Darvishian, Anna Pavlick, Russell Berman, Richard Shapiro, George Karlin-Neumann, Iman Osman, David Polsky. Identification of melanoma mutational tumor heterogeneity using BRAF, NRAS and TERT-promoter mutation-detection assays [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4704.