An Investigation of Virtual Reality Nature Experiences in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)
Authors: Chin Stanley , Cavadino Alana , Akroyd Amelia , Tennant Geraldine , Dobson Rosie , Gautier Adele , Reynolds Lisa 
Published: April 2022

BACKGROUND

Connection with nature has well-established physical and psychological benefits. However, women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are often unable to access nature because of physical limitations, psychological barriers, and treatment demands. Virtual reality (VR) nature experiences offer an alternative means of connecting with nature and may be of particular benefit to patients with cancer who are house- or hospital-bound.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore whether VR nature experiences are associated with physical and psychological benefits for women with MBC who are disconnected with nature.

METHODS

This secondary analysis of a previous randomized controlled crossover trial recruited participants from the emailing lists of breast cancer support organizations. Participants were provided VR headsets for daily use in their homes for over 3 weeks. In the first week, participants used 1 of 2 VR nature experiences (<i>Ripple</i> or <i>Happy Place</i>) daily, followed by a 1-week washout period, before using the other VR experience every day for the final week. Outcomes assessed changes between baseline and postintervention scores in quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), pain (Brief Pain Inventory Short Form), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-fatigue), depression (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-depression), anxiety (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-anxiety), and spiritual well-being (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Spiritual Well-being) and investigated whether benefits were greater in participants who were not strongly connected with nature at baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 38 women with MBC completed the VR interventions and were included in the analyses. Participants reported significantly less fatigue (<i>P</i>=.001), less depression (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), and greater quality of life (<i>P=</i>.02) following the interventions than at baseline. Women with a weaker connection to nature reported greater fatigue (<i>P</i>=.03), depression (<i>P</i>=.006), and anxiety (<i>P</i>=.001), and poorer spirituality (<i>P</i>=.004) than their strongly connected counterparts. Only those with a weaker baseline connection with nature showed improvements in depression following the intervention (<i>P</i>=.03), with similar trends observed in fatigue (<i>P</i>=.07) and quality of life (<i>P</i>=.10).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary evidence that feeling connected with nature is associated with better physical and psychological status in patients with MBC and that VR nature interventions might be beneficial for this clinical population. Future studies should focus on activities that encourage connection with nature (rather than simply exposure to nature) and investigate the aspects of VR nature interventions that have the greatest therapeutic potential.

CLINICALTRIAL

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001480178; https://tinyurl.com/et6z3vac