Do We Need to Re‐Focus on Functional Female Urethral Disorders in Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction? ICI‐RS 2024
Authors: Chermansky Christopher J. , Ockrim Jeremy L. , Kheir George Bou , Chapple Christopher R. , Kearney Rohna , Toia Bogdan , Dmochowski Roger R. , Wein Alan J. , Abrams Paul 
Published: November 2024

Aims

Insights into the role of the urethra in maintaining continence and in normal voiding have been provided with advances in imaging techniques. Also, functional urethral testing is used to understand which treatments are optimal for women with functional bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), but which testing is better for which treatment? This review aims to describe our current understanding of female urethral function and dysfunction and to provide future research directions for treating functional female urethral disorders.

Materials and Methods

This is a consensus report of the proceedings of a research proposal discussed at the annual International Consultation on Incontinence‐Research Society (ICI‐RS), 6th–8th June 2024 (Bristol, UK): “Do we need to re‐focus on functional female urethral disorders in lower urinary tract dysfunction? ICI‐RS 2024”.

Results

Regarding female urethral nomenclature, it was agreed that the same terminology should be used in the orientation of the female urethra as in the male. Also, functional MRI and computer modeling could aid further understanding of urethral function in women with voiding dysfunction and OAB symptoms. As for functional urethral assessment, options include video‐urodynamics with leak point pressure (LPP) testing, urethral pressure profilometry (UPP), and striated urethral sphincter electromyography (EMG). Future testing may include the use of modalities (borrowed from cardiologic assessment of vascular structures such as resistive measures obtained with ultrasound) for the purpose of assessing urethral closure. UPP testing has limitations in measurement and reproducibility in assessing urethral pressure. Urethral sphincter EMG is difficult to perform and reproduce. LPP also has limitations related to testing and to patient effort, in addition to being influenced by factors such as bladder volume and compliance. When performing urethral surgery, it is imperative to dissect in tissue planes that preserve urethral function. Regarding therapeutic modalities for the treatment of functional female urethral dysfunction, conservative management includes pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback, electrical stimulation, and extracorporeal magnetic stimulation. Furthermore, there was a robust discussion on the use of cognitive‐behavioral therapy to address psychological comorbidities, thereby improving female LUTD. The evidence supporting long‐term pharmacologic treatment of female urethral LUTD remains scarce. As for invasive management options, the evidence supporting the use of botulinum toxin in female LUTD is limited. Finally, the very existence of BNO and the validity of its diagnosis was discussed. Furthermore, bladder neck incision as a treatment of BNO was debated, and the indications for this procedure include a therapeutic decision balancing benefit to complications.

Conclusion

Improving the treatment of female functional storage and voiding disorders depends on optimal urethral function assessment. Functional MRI to better understand urethral function, expanding the use of UPP testing, LPP testing, and emerging modalities while maintaining urethral function during female urethral surgery, and addressing psychological comorbidities whilst pursuing both conservative and invasive options (for refractory symptoms) are all important considerations in treating functional female urethral disorders.