Abstract P5-14-08: Prospective phase II study of concurrent capecitabine and radiation demonstrates futility in triple negative chemo-resistant breast cancer
Authors: Woodward WA , Arriaga L , Gao H , Cohen EN , Li L , Reuben JM , Munsell MF , Valero V , Le-Petross H , Melhem-Betrandt A , Moulder S , Middleton LP , Strom EA , Tereffe W , Hoffman K , Smith BD , Buchholz TA , Perkins GH 
Published: August 2014

Background: Capecitabine is an established radiosensitizer in rectal and other cancers. We conducted a prospective single arm phase II study to examine the response rate of gross chemo-refractory breast cancer treated with concurrent capecitabine and radiotherapy.

Methods: Patients who had inoperable or marginally operable gross disease in the breast and/or lymph node(s) after chemotherapy or gross disease on the chest wall or in the regional lymphatics after mastectomy were eligible. Patients 1-9 received capecitabine 825 mg/m2 BID daily beginning on the first day of radiotherapy. Excess grade 3 toxicity (%) was observed; the protocol was amended and subsequent patients received drug only on radiation treatment days. Radiation dose was at the discretion of the treating physician (50Gy-72 Gy, with no more than 2.5 Gy/fraction). Response was assessed by a single physician using paired radiation planning CTs (pretreatment and on-treatment after 45 Gy). Clinical correlation to all other available imaging was also made. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood were examined in consenting patients.

Results: The trial was stopped early after an unplanned interim analysis prompted by slow accrual suggested futility independent of response. From 2009-2012, 32 patients were accrued; 26 completed protocol specific treatment (17 post-mastectomy radiation with gross nodes, 4 pre-op, 5 aggressive palliation) and are included in this analysis. Median follow up was 7.3 months (interquartile range 6.7 – 17.4). Nineteen patients (73%) had a partial or complete response. Fourteen patients (53.9%) experienced at least one grade 3 non-dermatitis toxicity including 7/9 treated with continuous dosing. Four inoperable patients were treated with pre-op radiation therapy and 3 converted to operable. None achieved a pCR or near pCR. One-year actuarial OS was 52%. There was no difference in OS comparing among PMRT vs. preoperative or palliative RT (P = 0.90). One-year actuarial local recurrence free survival among PMRT patients was 38%. Ten patients had triple negative (TN) receptor status. There was no difference in radiation response by receptor status (P = 0.56); however, treatment was deemed subjectively futile (i.e., converted to operable but death secondary to new widespread M1 disease immediately post-op) in 9 of the 10 patients with TN disease versus 6 of the 16 patients with non-TN disease (P = 0.014). Median OS and 1-yr actuarial OS, among non-TN vs. TN patients were not reached vs. 6.1 months and 77% vs. 10% (P &lt; 0.001), respectively. Eight/fifteen patients tested were positive for CTCs. CTCs did not correlate to receptor status, futility of RT or OS.

Conclusions: Capecitabine can be safely administered as a daily concurrent chemoradiation regimen with weekend holidays. However, in this small, prospective and selected cohort, concurrent chemoradiation with capecitabine was futile among patients with TN breast cancer. Alternative strategies are urgently needed in TN patients.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-14-08.