Characterization of Somatic Mosaicism and Mutational Profiling of Clonal Hematopoiesis Compared to MDS and sAML Depicts Diversities of Clonal Evolution
Authors: Hecker Judith S. , Hartmann Luise , Rothenberg-Thurley Maja , Rivière Jennifer , Ksienzyk Bianka , Buck Michele C. , Van Der Garde Mark , Fischer Luise , Winter Susann , Rauner Martina , Tsourdi Elena , Sockel Katja , Schneider Marie , Kubasch Anne Sophie , Nolde Martin , Hausmann Dominikus , Lützner Jörg , Roth Andreas , Bassermann Florian , Spiekermann Karsten , Hofbauer Lorenz , Platzbecker Uwe , Metzeler Klaus H. , Goetze Katharina S. 
Published: November 2021

Background:

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) describes the presence of genetic alterations and expansion of clonal cell populations in the peripheral blood (PB) of individuals without clinical manifestation of a hematologic malignancy. CH is a common, age-related state. However, individuals carrying CH are at greater risk for hematologic cancer. It has been shown that presence of TP53- and other high-risk mutations, variant allele frequency (VAF) &gt;10% or multiple mutations in CH carriers may confer a higher risk of preleukemic development and transformation to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Nevertheless, further insights into the role of CH in clonal evolution towards leukemia and elaborating features that are predictive of leukemic progression are needed.

Aims:

We have recently shown that CH is common in individuals undergoing hip replacement surgery (Hecker, Hartmann et al., Blood 2021). Here, we compared mutational spectrum in these CH individuals to MDS and secondary AML (sAML) cohorts. Additionally, we analyzed spatial and lineage distribution of CH and longitudinally monitored CH and MDS clones over time.

Methods:

Samples from individuals without known hematologic disease undergoing hip replacement surgery (n=288 samples from 261 individuals), patients with MDS (n=92) or sAML (n=123) were screened for variants in 68 leukemia-associated genes using a targeted sequencing approach (VAF cut off, 1%). Follow-up (FU) PB samples were available for 21 individuals with CH and 16 untreated low-risk MDS patients, 6-24 months after screening. n=5 CH bone marrow (BM) samples carrying six ASXL1-mutations were sorted for seven different cell fractions.

Results:

At screening, variants were detected in 127/261 (49%) healthy individuals, 84/92 (91%) MDS and 117/123 (95%) sAML patients, with median VAFs of 2.7% (ranging from 1-44%), 18.8% (1.1-87%) and 37.1% (1-99%), respectively. Individuals with CH had a median number of 1 variant per individual, whereas median detected variants per patient increased with clonal evolution with 3 variants in the MDS and 4 variants per patient in the sAML cohort.

CH, MDS and sAML showed entity-specific mutation profiles (Figure 1A). Most variants in CH affected epigenetic modifiers, while mutations in splicing factors, signaling pathways and transcription factors increased with clonal progression.

During FU, untreated low-risk MDS patients more frequently gained additional mutations compared to CH individuals (7/16 vs 2/21, respectively; p=0.024). However, we did not observe significant changes in clone sizes over time.

In 17 hip replacement individuals both femoral heads were removed simultaneously, allowing paired analysis of two different hematopoietic sites. CH prevalence in this subgroup was 70.6% (12/17). Ten individuals showed identical mutation patterns in BM obtained from the right and left femoral head, with little differences in VAFs (Table 1). In contrast, two other individuals showed significant differences in variant detection comparing one to the other side: ASXL1-mutations were only present in one hip sample, whereas all the other variants were detectable in both sides (p&lt;0.001), indicating possible spatial heterogeneity of CH clones in the BM compartment.

To further characterize ASXL1 mosaicism across hematopoietic lineages and differentiation stages, we sorted and sequenced n=5 CH BM samples carrying six ASXL1-mutations for seven different hematopoietic cell fractions. In all cases ASXL1-mutations were identified in CD34 +CD38 -CD90 + hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). VAFs of ASXL1-mutations were differentially distributed (p=0.0049, Kruskal Wallis test): detected VAFs were significantly higher in HSC and common myeloid progenitors (CMP) compared to VAFs in T-cells (p=0.045 and p=0.011, respectively; Dunn´s multiple comparison test; Figure 1B).

Conclusions:

CH, MDS and sAML show characteristic mutation profiles that remained stable over a 6-24-month period. Gains of additional variants and clonal expansion associated with disease progression. Cellular distribution analysis of ASXL1 CH variants revealed characteristic repartition patterns within the hematopoietic differentiation tree. Additionally, differences in variant detection between cellular BM compartments indicates spatial heterogeneity of CH clones warranting further investigation.

J.S.H. and L.H. contributed equally.

Figure 1 Figure 1.

Disclosures

Platzbecker: Geron: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Goetze: BMS/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Advisory Board.