Correlation of histologic, imaging, and artificial intelligence features in NAFLD patients, derived from Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: a proof-of-concept study
Authors: Bastati Nina , Perkonigg Matthias , Sobotka Daniel , Poetter-Lang Sarah , Fragner Romana , Beer Andrea , Messner Alina , Watzenboeck Martin , Pochepnia Svitlana , Kittinger Jakob , Herold Alexander , Kristic Antonia , Hodge Jacqueline C. , Traussnig Stefan , Trauner Michael , Ba-Ssalamah Ahmed , Langs Georg 
Published: June 2023

Objective

To compare unsupervised deep clustering (UDC) to fat fraction (FF) and relative liver enhancement (RLE) on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to distinguish simple steatosis from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), using histology as the gold standard.

Materials and methods

A derivation group of 46 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients underwent 3-T MRI. Histology assessed steatosis, inflammation, ballooning, and fibrosis. UDC was trained to group different texture patterns from MR data into 10 distinct clusters per sequence on unenhanced T1- and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1-weighted hepatobiliary phase (T1-Gd-EOB-DTPA-HBP), then on T1 in- and opposed-phase images. RLE and FF were quantified on identical sequences. Differences of these parameters between NASH and simple steatosis were evaluated with χ2- and t-tests, respectively. Linear regression and Random Forest classifier were performed to identify associations between histological NAFLD features, RLE, FF, and UDC patterns, and then determine predictors able to distinguish simple steatosis from NASH. ROC curves assessed diagnostic performance of UDC, RLE, and FF. Finally, we tested these parameters on 30 validation cohorts.

Results

For the derivation group, UDC-derived features from unenhanced and T1-Gd-EOB-DTPA-HBP, plus from T1 in- and opposed-phase, distinguished NASH from simple steatosis (p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively) with 85% and 80% accuracy, respectively, while RLE and FF distinguished NASH from simple steatosis (p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively), with 83% and 78% accuracy, respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, RLE and FF correlated only with fibrosis (p = 0.040) and steatosis (p ≤ 0.001), respectively. Conversely, UDC features, using Random Forest classifier predictors, correlated with all histologic NAFLD components. The validation group confirmed these results for both approaches.

Conclusion

UDC, RLE, and FF could independently separate NASH from simple steatosis. UDC may predict all histologic NAFLD components.

Clinical relevance statement

Using gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR, fat fraction (FF > 5%) can diagnose NAFLD, and relative liver enhancement can distinguish NASH from simple steatosis. Adding AI may let us non-invasively estimate the histologic components, i.e., fat, ballooning, inflammation, and fibrosis, the latter the main prognosticator.

Key Points

• Unsupervised deep clustering (UDC) and MR-based parameters (FF and RLE) could independently distinguish simple steatosis from NASH in the derivation group.

• On multivariate analysis, RLE could predict only fibrosis, and FF could predict only steatosis; however, UDC could predict all histologic NAFLD components in the derivation group.

• The validation cohort confirmed the findings for the derivation group.