Re-Examination of 2017 ELN Risk Classification By a Cohort of 739 De Novo aml Patients in Taiwan: Co-Occurring Poor-Risk Mutations May Further Predict Outcome in FLT3-ITD Patients
Authors: Huang Sheng-Chuan , Hou Hsin-An , Tsai Cheng-Hong , Chou Wen-Chien , Tang Jih-Luh , Yao Ming , Ko Bor-Sheng , Tien Feng-Ming , Kuo Yuan-Yeh , Tseng Mei-Hsuan , Lin Chien-Chin , Lin Chien-Ting , Chuang Ming-Kai , Huang Tai-Chung , Chen Chien-Yuan , Hsu Szu-Chun , Cheng Chieh-Lung , Huang Huai-Hsuan , Chou Sheng-Chieh , Wu Shang-Ju , Huang Shang-YI , Tien Hwei-Fang 
Published: October 2019

Introduction

Recent advances in the discovery of the genomic landscape in AML prompts necessity to re-examine the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendation. In this study we aimed to validate the usefulness of 2017 ELN risk stratification in a large Taiwan cohort with special focus on the prognostic relevance of FLT3-ITD allelic ratio and its interaction with other mutations.

Methods

We retrospectively included 1040 de novo non-M3 AML patients. AML was risk-stratified according to the 2017 ELN recommendation. 739 (71.1%) patients who received standard chemotherapy were included for survival analysis. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was performed in 293 (39.6%) patients. Mutational analyses of fifteen genes, including CEBPA, NPM1, FLT3, RUNX1, ASXL1, TP53, splicing factors (SF), such as SRSF2, U2AF1, and SF3B1, as well as KIT, NRAS, KRAS, DNMT3A, TET2, and WT1 were performed. FLT3-ITD/wild allelic ratios were calculated as the ratio of the area under the curve by fragment analysis. High FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (FLT3-ITDhigh) was defined as ³ 0.5 and low allelic ratio (FLT3-ITDlow) defined as < 0.5.

Results

According to the 2017 ELN risk classification, favorable, intermediate and adverse categories comprised 34.6%, 29.2% and 36.2% patients, respectively. NPM1 mutations and FLT3-ITD, the most common mutations in this cohort, were detected in 217 (20.9%) and 216 (20.8%) patients, respectively, with a significant association between each other. The median value of the FLT3-ITD/wild ratio was 0.68 without difference between NPM1-mutated and NPM1-wild group. Of note, patients with FLT3-ITDhigh had higher WBC count and LDH level than those with FLT3-ITDlow.

Overall, the CR rate and relapse rate were 74.2% and 54.7%, respectively and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 43.2±1.9%. The CR rate (92.3%) was higher in the 2017 ELN favorable risk group than in the intermediate (73.0%) and adverse groups (52.0%, P<0.001). Similarly, favorable-risk patients had lower relapse rate, longer disease-free survival (DFS) and OS compared to those with intermediate- and adverse-risk features (all P<0.001).

As to the prognostic impact of FLT3-ITD, we showed that FLT3-ITD patients had significantly lower CR rate, higher relapse rate, reduced DFS and OS than those without. There was a strikingly difference in treatment response between the low and high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio groups: CR rate (80.7% vs. 63.6%, P=0.0319), relapse rate (56.5% vs. 66.2%, P=0.329), DFS (14.2 vs. 4.6 months P=0.011) and OS (24.0 vs. 11.9 months, P=0.048). Interestingly, patients with FLT3-ITDhigh had a better OS if they received allogeneic HSCT than those who did not.

Among the 2017 ELN favorable-risk category, we found that patients with mutated NPM1 and FLT3-ITDlow had significantly shorter OS (median, not reached vs. 31.6 months, P=0.003, Figure. 1A) and a trend of shorter DFS (median 14.9 months vs. 93.9 months, P=0.089, Figure. 1B) compared to other ELN favorable subgroups. To find the cause of the difference, we investigated the concurrent mutations in the patients with mutated NPM1 and FLT3-ITDlow. 46.2% of them had concurrent poor-risk mutations, such as ASXL1, RUNX1, TP53, WT1, TET2, DNMT3A, and SF mutations. Similarly, among the 2017 ELN intermediate-risk category, patients with mutated NPM1 and FLT3-ITDhigh had more unfavorable outcomes compared to those with wild-type NPM1 and without FLT3-ITD (DFS, median 3.7 vs. 11.6 months, P=0.028 and OS, median, 11.4 vs. 26.5 months, P=0.067). Presence of concurrent poor-risk mutations were also identified in 72.9% of these patients. Based on these findings, we postulated that concomitant poor-risk genetic alterations at least partially affected the prognosis of FLT3/ITD patients. In the cohort of FLT3-ITD patients, patients harboring poor-risk mutations had shorter DFS and OS than those without (P=0.028 and P=0.031, respectively). Further, co-occurrence of FLT3-ITDhigh and poor-risk mutations that predicted a worst outcome, seemed to define a highly adverse prognostic group.

Conclusions

We showed that ELN 2017 risk classification could well stratify AML patients in Taiwan. The prognostic relevance of FLT3-ITD may further depend on the presence or absence of co-occurring poor-risk genetic alterations, which seemed to add an adverse effect in patients with FLT3-ITD. These observations warrant confirmation in other prospective and large-scale studies.

Disclosures

Ko: Roche: Research Funding; GNT Biotech & Medicals Crop.: Research Funding; Abbevie: Research Funding; Mumdipharma Taiwan: Consultancy.