An Improved Numerical Computation of Hull Pressure Fluctuations Due to Unsteady Sheet Cavitation of a Propeller
Authors: Kao Jui-Hsiang 
Published: July 2018

An operating propeller is the main source of vibration on the ship hull, especially on the stern. In this article, an improved numerical scheme is presented to predict the pressure fluctuations on the ship hull due to the unsteady sheet cavitation of a propeller. The calculated results are compared with the published results and experimental data carried out in the hydrodynamics and cavitation tunnel of Hamburgische Schiffbau-Versuchsanstalt to verify the improvement. The present method is based on a two-cycle iterating scheme which satisfies the boundary integral equation in time domain. The hull pressure fluctuations calculated by the first-cycle iterations are treated as the initial values for the second-cycle iterations. The solid angles of the elements will deviate from the standard value, .5, as the dramatic variation in geometry appears, and accumulate numerical errors in the calculating process. During the second-cycle iterations, a filter based on the solid angles on hull elements is proposed to minimize the iterating error. A container ship is treated as the computing sample in this study, and evidence is offered regarding the 16% improvement achieved by the present method.

1. Introduction

A propeller operating in a nonuniform wake field in the ocean is one of the prime sources of vibration and noise affecting the ship. The prediction of hull pressure fluctuations caused by propellers is an important consideration for many vessels and worthy of being researched.

Hull pressure fluctuation caused by the marine propeller has been widely investigated since the 1980s. Huse and Guoqiang (1982) developed a semi-empirical prediction method, in which the cavitation volume on the propeller blade surface can be estimated using experimental data. Breslin et al. (1982) proposed a model based on the potential flow theory, which simulates the ship hull by means of a simple panel method and the propeller by means of a lifting surface vortex lattice method. Kinns and Bloor (2004) used an acoustic boundary element (BE) model to simplify the problem of hull vibration excitation due to propeller sources and dipoles. The convergence of results for a cruise liner model was demonstrated with different element distributions. Kehr and Kao (2004) derived the incident blade rate pressure induced by unsteady sheet cavitation (monopole) and unsteady forces (dipole) of an operating propeller, for calculating the hull pressure fluctuations. Brouwer (2005) applied a stationary set of rings of monopole and dipole sources in the frequency domain to solve the propeller-induced noise and vibrations. Lee et al. (2006) integrated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and the finite difference method for the computation of propeller-induced hull vibration. It was recommended that the phase difference of the propeller-induced pressure should be considered for preventing overprediction. Kao and Kehr (2006) developed a time domain iteration method to calculate the hull pressure fluctuations induced by the operating propeller. The phase difference is included in the iterating scheme, and the computation is robustly convergent. Seol and Moon (2009) derived the governing equation of pressure fluctuation induced by sheet cavitation according to the Ffowcs Williams approach. In the study by van Wijngaarden (2011), a potential flow boundary element method (BEM) with measured hull pressure data as input was applied to solve the hull pressure fluctuations, and the model experiments were also carried out. It was concluded that the computed hull pressure fluctuations due to non-cavitating propellers is reasonably accurate compared with the experimental data. Kehr and Kao (2011) calculated the pressure fluctuations on ship hull due to propeller sheet cavitation by using the method presented in Kao and Kehr (2006). The numerical result is higher than the experimental data provided by the hydrodynamics and cavitation tunnel (HYKAT) of HSVA (Wiemer 1999) by approximately 27%. The pressure fluctuations on ship stern induced by cavitating propellers were solved by Kanemaru and Ando (2011) with a surface panel method. The maximum amplitude appears in the first blade frequency and overestimates the experimental data by about 30%. Kim et al. (2012) predicted the hull pressure fluctuations induced by marine propeller sheet cavitation, and the Doppler effect was considered at the same time. Wei and Wang (2013) employed CFD to simulate the propulsion of a submarine. The finite element method and BEM were then combined to solve the submarine's structure and acoustic responses under the propeller excitations. The matched-field inversion technique applied in Lee et al. (2014) uses the fluctuating hull pressure field measured by receivers and the acoustic field calculated by BEM to define the sheet cavitation noise, source strengths, source positions, and number of sources. The equivalent source model for the propeller can result in more accurately extrapolated hull pressure distribution. In Wei et al. (2016), the unsteady forces of a submarine propeller were predicted by CFD, and the hull pressure fluctuations due to the non-cavitation propeller were calculated by the method proposed in Kao and Kehr (2006).