Professional Development
Authors: Hirsh Stephanie , Killion Joellen , Pollard Joyce 
Published: June 2013

The span of professional development research literature reveals, arguably, three trends. Literature of the earliest phase, largely during the 1970s and 1980s—the era of the “search for the perfect workshop”—was characterized more by a focus on evaluations of teacher satisfaction with professional development than an examination of long-term outcomes of professional development. The second phase, from the 1990s to the early 2000s, reflects a shift in research focus to the identification of characteristics of effective professional development experiences. Many studies of school improvement and education reform named professional learning—with a focus on educator learning as an ongoing process rather than a one-time event—as one of the top five components of reform efforts. A research base enriched by examinations of schools as places of work and learning sought to clarify what was known about teachers’ own learning and the effects on their practice, and ultimately, on student learning. Thus, the third, and current, phase examines the role professional an educator’s own learning plays in a dynamic, complex system of professional learning. New technologies have also advanced to support educator learning. Since the 1990s, many studies confirm that a strong relationship exists between teacher practice and student learning. Research of some models concludes that professional learning positively influences teacher practice. Studies of school and district leadership suggest a relationship also exists among leadership practices, teaching effectiveness, and student learning. Some findings conclude that there is a relationship between professional learning and student achievement. The literature about effective schools identifies collaboration among educators and professional learning as two characteristics that consistently appear in schools that substantially increase student learning. Some studies of the effects of professional learning have also produced statistically insignificant results on teacher practice or student achievement when measured over a brief period of time, usually a single year. As a result of the new decade of research, understanding about what distinguishes effective professional learning is growing clearer. Accordingly, Learning Forward undertook a third revision of the Standards for Professional Learning in 2011. This article is organized to help graduate students, education scholars, and professional development leaders, practitioners, and facilitators navigate the landscape of scholarship about effective professional development activities, policies, and structures that contribute to a system of professional learning. The structure of this article organizes supporting literature, first, in sections that trace the problems and promises of early professional development literature through studies of effective professional development. Sections follow with references to literature about professional development and results for teacher practice and student outcomes. The remaining sections of the bibliography correspond to each of the seven standards: “Learning Communities,” “Leadership,” “Resources,” “Data,” “Learning Designs,” “Implementation,” and “Outcomes.”