Neurohormonal reactivation in heart failure patients on chronic ACE inhibitor therapy: a longitudinal study
Authors: Lee Alison F.C. , MacFadyen Robert J. , Struthers Allan D. 
Published: July 2002

Background:

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality in heart failure. One therapeutic mechanism is believed to be the reduction of circulating angiotensin II and aldosterone. However, the Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone axis (RAAS) is not uniformly suppressed during therapy for heart failure. This effect has been referred to as ‘angiotensin II reactivation’ and ‘aldosterone escape’ and their reactivation may herald clinical deterioration. In the CONSENSUS I trial, correlations were seen between mortality, and angiotensin II and aldosterone. Furthermore, mortality was lower in those with good angiotensin II suppression. Therefore, neurohormonal elevation despite adequate treatment may associate with a poorer prognosis.

Aims:

To follow chronic heart failure patients on ACE inhibitors for 18 months to assess whether or not angiotensin II and aldosterone reactivation are progressive with time, whether reactivation of both occurs simultaneously, and whether different ACE inhibitors have different neurohormonal profiles.

Methods and results:

We studied 22 patients (M/F 19:3, 72.5 ± 7 years) on stable ACE inhibitors. Five times, in 18 months, samples were taken for neurohormones and ACE activity. Mean levels of neurohormones were remarkably stable over time, although captopril takers had generally higher angiotensin II, but lower aldosterone and renin. Aldosterone ‘escape’ (> 80 pg/ml) occurred in 13/97 samples (13.5%), in 5/22 (23%) individuals. Angiotensin II was elevated ≥10 pg/ml in 8/102 samples (8%), in 6/22 (27%) individuals. Four subjects had isolated angiotensin II reactivation, and three had aldosterone escape alone. On regression analyses between neurohormones in captopril takers there were significant correlations between; renin and angiotensin II (r = 0.62; P < 0.02); angiotensin II and aldosterone (r = 0.6; P < 0.02); and renin and aldosterone (r = 0.92; P < 0.00001).

Conclusion:

In stable heart failure patients un‐suppressed levels of angiotensin II and aldosterone occur despite therapy, but they are not necessarily progressive, nor simultaneous. Furthermore, contemporaneous serum ACE activity makes it unlikely the data presented reflects poor compliance. The results suggest that captopril takers may have different neurohormonal profiles, i.e. higher angiotensin II, and also better correlations between RAAS components, compared to longer acting preparations, although the numbers are small. Our data supports that of Swedberg et al. who showed reductions in both aldosterone and angiotensin II due to ACE inhibitor therapy, but no correlation between ACE activity and angiotensin II and only a limited correlation (r = 0.37) between angiotensin II and aldosterone. This suggests that the interaction between the components of the renin–angiotensin system is not simple and linear. The fact that each phenomenon appears to occur in isolation means that neurohormonal monitoring of individual could provide useful information to direct additional therapy. The RALES study has demonstrated reduced mortality from the addition of spironolactone to an ACE inhibitor emphasising the benefit of enhanced suppression of aldosterone in heart failure. Captopril may be less effective at suppressing the RAAS due to its short duration of action which would logically be associated with a more fluctuating pattern of ACE inhibition. In the presence of high levels of renin and angiotensin I even small differences in ACE activity will produce large variations in angiotensin II levels. Further studies should be directed at understanding the different mechanisms behind angiotensin II and aldosterone generation during ACE inhibition.