Abstract 895: Quantitative drug sensitivity and resistance testing (DSRT) of primary ex vivo AML blasts highlights mTOR and MEK as potential key molecular driver signals of therapeutic significance
Authors: Pemovska Tea , Kylesskiy Evgeny , Kontro Mika , Szwajda Agnieszka , Karjalainen Riikka , Majumder Muntasir M. , Malani Disha , Bespalov Maxim M. , Eldfors Samuli , Elonen Erkki , Knowles Jonathan , Murumägi Astrid , Mpindi John P. , Edgren Henrik , Venkata Naga Poojitha Kota , Turunen Laura , Mustjoki Satu , Wolf Maija , Yadav Bhagwan , Aittokallio Tero , Heckman Caroline A. , Porkka Kimmo , Kallioniemi Olli , Wennerberg Krister 
Published: August 2012

Identification of signaling pathways that are required for the growth and differentiation block of cells from adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is urgently required to facilitate development of novel therapies. Here, we describe an approach to functionally determine molecular drivers of AML by quantitative drug sensitivity and resistance testing (DSRT) of AML blast cells in primary culture ex vivo. The selection of drugs covered the entire cancer pharmacopeia and much of the pipeline of drugs under development in the industry: 120 FDA approved small molecular cancer drugs and 120 emerging drugs, investigational compounds and signal transduction inhibitors. All compounds were tested over a 10,000-fold concentration range to generate quantitative and reliable dose-response data. In addition, whole exome and transcriptome sequencing and phophoproteomic profiling were also performed to derive a comprehensive understanding of the molecular AML-related aberrations on an individual basis. Comparison of 17 AML patient samples and 3 healthy bone marrow control samples based on ex vivo drug responses identified several classes of approved and investigational drugs that showed selective anti-AML activities: mTOR inhibitors (e.g. temsirolomus, everolimus, sirolimus), MEK inhibitors (e.g. AS703026, GSK1120212, RDEA119, selumetinib), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g. dasatinib, ponatinib, sunitinib), Bcl-2 inhibitors (navitoclax) and HSP90 inhibitors (e.g. BIIB021, NVP-AUY922, tanespimycin). In particular, the rapamycin class of mTOR inhibitors and allosteric MEK inhibitors stood out as effective and selective inhibitors in 8/17 (47%) and 9/17 (52%) of the patients, respectively. Simultaneous data from other targeted inhibitors made it possible to dissect the critical steps in signaling and therapeutic efficacy. For example, PI3K and Akt inhibitors were not effective in these patients, suggesting that the mTOR dependency is mediated through a PI3K-Akt-independent pathway. Similarly, the dependency of MEK signaling appears to be through a Ras-Raf-independent pathway since Raf inhibitors were not effective. In conclusion, the DSRT platform allows us to derive quantitative data on the ex vivo drug response profiles of AML cells from individual patients. This information could be used as a diagnostic tool to optimize personalized therapies in the future. Our data demonstrate that mTOR and MEK signaling and the associated inhibitors are the most promising leads for improved AML therapeutics. This analysis also demonstrates gaps in our current understanding of the redundancy of key cancer cell signaling pathways and proves the significant value of data from experimental drug response testing ex vivo.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 895. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-895