Settle Conflicts in the Intelligence Differentiation Area using the Raw Material Conversion (RMC) Intelligence Model Built upon the Systematic Integrated Review (SIR) Paradigm
Authors: Huang Wei 
Published: April 2024

There are many competing and conflicting empirical research results from different studies in the Intelligence Differentiation (ID) field, existing theories and methodologies still cannot explain and settle these competing conflicts well. In order to quench the conflicting results in the intelligence differentiation research field, the current paper will be dedicated to construct an original integrated intelligence differentiation theory termed Raw Material Conversion (RMC) that can simultaneously explain and uniformly integrate as many phenomena as possible in this field. The RMC, including a palm model, several mathematical calculation models and some other relevant sub-theories, is constructed based on the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) principle requiring construct of Systematic Integrative Theory (SIT). This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) principle is essentially a kind of theoretical research methodology that can also be termed as Systematic Integrative Review (SIR) or Systematic Integrative Theory Construct Review (SITCR) paradigm. In the present paper, the SIR or SITCR paradigm is suggested as a common Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology that all literature reviews should follow, and, the final purpose of SLR is to construct a Systematic Integrated Theory (SIT) that can uniformly interpret as many empirical data, results, theories and phenomena as possible in the target area. That is, all SLR should end up with constructing a SIT as the ultimate aim of the SLR. Based on this SLR, SIT, SIR or SITCR philosophy, the intelligence RMC theory is constructed demonstrating how the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) paradigm, or the SIR and SITCR paradigm, can work to end up with a Systematic Integrated Theory (SIT) construct in the Intelligence Differentiation (ID) area. This RMC intelligence theory is constructed by comparing intelligence and all psychological activities to a kind of Material, i.e. the Bio-Electromagnetic Wave (BEMW) or the Bio-Electromagnetic Matrix (BEMM), which can also be used to uniformly interpret many conflicting empirical study results in the intelligence differentiation area, as well as used as the most fundamental mind ultimate material to uniformly integrate the whole psychology’s fragmentization. Furthermore, a sub-theory about the g Intelligence Generation Ability (IGA) addressing Exogenous Intelligence (XI), Endogenous Intelligence (NI) and Systematic Intelligence (SI) is also constructed based on the RMC model. In the RMC model, the essence of consciousness or mind is nothing but the material of various Bio-Electromagnetic Waves (BEMW) or Bio-Electromagnetic Matrices (BEMM) themselves or their interactions that are simultaneously emerging when the concomitant neural circuit is forming in human brain. In other words, the concomitantly forming mental loop of BEMW or BEMM based on the forming neural circuit is exactly the very consciousness essence in itself, physically and materially expressed as BEMW or BEMM in the brain, as well as psychologically and mentally manifested as consciousness or unconsciousness in the mind, depending on the strength of BEMW or BEMM. Moreover, the RMC theory model is also a phylogenetic demonstration of the dynamic differentiation processes of the MIDSCO mind-and-brain meta-theory (Huang, 2018c), due to the fact that the Raw Material BEMM can convert into various Sub Materials or Sub-BEMMs, corresponding to the g stuff, s stuff, Exogenous Intelligence (E-XI), Endogenous Intelligence (E-NI) and Systematic Intelligence (SI) etc.. Differentiations of XI, NI and SI from the g factor can function well to explain differences between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Human Intelligence (HI), as well as individuals’ positive and negative social utility differences between meta-essential personality and meta-anomaly personality (Huang, 2018d). Besides, an epistemology philosophy addressing a cognitive hybrid of hot knowledge and cold knowledge (Huang, 2018b) about psychology is also discoursed.