The EMEP Intensive Measurement Period campaign, 2008–2009: Characterizing the carbonaceous aerosol at nine rural sites in Europe
Authors: Yttri Karl Espen , Simpson David , Bergström Robert , Kiss Gyula , Szidat Sönke , Ceburnis Darius , Eckhardt Sabine , Hueglin Christoph , Nøjgaard Jacob Klenø , Perrino Cinzia , Pisso Ignacio , Prevot Andre Stephan Henry , Putaud Jean-Philippe , Spindler Gerald , Vana Milan , Zhang Yan-Lin , Aas Wenche 
Published: November 2018

Abstract. Source apportionment (SA) of carbonaceous aerosol was performed as part of the EMEP Intensive Measurement Periods (EIMPs), conducted in fall 2008 and winter/spring 2009. Levels of elemental carbon (EC), particulate organic carbon (OCp), particulate total carbon (TCp), levoglucosan and 14C in PM10, observed at nine European rural background sites, were used as input for the SA, whereas Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) was used to statistically treat the multitude of possible combinations resulting when ambient concentrations were combined with appropriate emission ratios. Five predefined sources/subcategories of carbonaceous aerosol were apportioned: Elemental and organic carbon from combustion of biomass (ECbb and OCbb) and from fossil fuel (ECff and OCff) sources, as well as remaining non-fossil organic carbon (OCrnf), typically dominated by natural sources. The carbonaceous aerosol concentration decreased from South to North, as did the concentration of the apportioned carbonaceous aerosol. OCrnf was more abundant in fall compared to winter/spring, reflecting the vegetative season, and made a larger contribution to TCp than anthropogenic sources (here: ECbb, OCbb, ECff and OCff) at four of the sites, whereas anthropogenic sources dominated at all but one sites in winter/spring. Levels of OCbb and ECbb were typically higher in winter/spring than in fall, due to larger residential wood burning emissions in the heating season, whereas there was no consistent seasonal pattern for fossil fuel emissions. Biomass burning (OCbb + ECbb) was the major anthropogenic source at the Central European sites in fall, whereas fossil fuel sources dominated at the southernmost and the two northernmost sites. In winter/spring, biomass burning was the major anthropogenic source at all but two sites. Addressing EC in particular, fossil fuel sources dominated at all sites in fall, whereas there was as shift towards biomass burning in winter/spring for the southernmost sites. Influence of residential wood burning emissions was substantial already in the first week of sampling in fall, constituting 30–50 % of TCp at most sites, showing that this source can be dominating even at a time of the year when the ambient temperature in Europe is still rather high. Model calculations were made, attempting to reproduce LHS-derived OCbb and ECbb, using two different residential wood burning emission inventories. Both simulations strongly under-predicted the LHS-derived values at most sites outside Scandinavia. Emissions based on a consistent bottom-up inventory for residential combustion (and including intermediate volatility compounds, IVOC) improved model results at most sites compared to the base-case emissions (based mainly on officially reported national emissions), but at the three southernmost sites the modelled OCbb and ECbb concentrations were still much lower than the LHS source apportioned results. The current study shows that natural sources is a major contributor to the carbonaceous aerosol in Europe even in fall and in winter/spring, and that residential wood burning emissions can be equally large or larger than that of fossil fuel sources, depending on season and region. Our results suggest that residential wood burning emissions are still poorly constrained for large parts of Europe. The need to improve emission inventories is obvious, with harmonization of emission factors between countries likely being the most important step to improve model calculations, not only for biomass burning emissions, but for European PM2.5 concentrations in general.