Time-Lapse Pulsed-Neutron Logs for CCS: What Have We Learned From All These Monitoring Runs?
Authors:   SLB, Laronga Robert , Swager Lee ,   SLB(retired), Bustos Ulises ,   SLB
Published: November 2024

Pulsed-neutron logs are a staple of time-lapse monitoring programs for saline-aquifer carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects and are unsurprisingly the most frequently run wireline log in both injection and monitoring wells. While the emphasis imposed by government regulators and the focus of operators to date has been on the verification of CO2 containment, it is envisioned that a savvy interpretation of the multiple independent measurements should be able to unlock much greater value for the project than merely detecting the location of stored CO2. Recently introduced capabilities for novel measurements and improved environmental compensation should further increase the repeatability, interpretability, and value of these logs. We reviewed more than 30 time-lapse pulsed-neutron logs acquired over a period of 15 years on mature CCS projects using both standard and new-generation pulsed-neutron tools, including measurements of formation sigma, hydrogen index, and fast neutron cross section. Special attention in processing is required when changes occur to the wellbore environment between runs, although this is mitigated by the improved environmental compensation scheme of the newer tool. We performed both standalone estimates of CO2 saturation from single-physics time-lapse measurements and simultaneous interpretation of multiple independent time-lapse measurements and studied the results side-by-side with openhole log interpretation, core analysis, and well-test results from the evaluation phase. The apparent changes in saturation were framed within the context of the injection history and important events in the life of the wells. A first finding is that differences in apparent CO2 saturation between the various independent measurement physics of the pulsed-neutron tool are often reconcilable and may carry additional information about the state of the well or reservoir. With respect to verification of containment, depending on the well configuration, it may be possible to differentiate between CO2 in the formation and CO2 in the annulus. The interpreted CO2 saturation itself can have different significance depending on the timing of acquisition and the type of well. Measured at the right time, it is a direct in-situ measurement of eCO2, the formation CO2 storage efficiency. In other cases, the interpretation reveals formation dry-out in the near wellbore region of injection wells, a condition that may presage loss of injectivity. We now understand that it is important for operators to plan the timing and frequency of pulsed-neutron runs according to what they want to measure and not based solely on regulatory obligations. In a CCS project, time-lapse pulsed-neutron logs should be thought of as much more than simple indicators of the presence and migration of CO2. They give important information about migration pathways. But they can also help to quantify essential uncertainties on reservoir performance that are difficult to ascertain during evaluation. For example, eCO2 is notoriously difficult to quantify with openhole logs since the formation is initially at zero CO2 saturation. Yet it is one of the keys to determining the ultimate storage capacity of any reservoir. Time-lapse pulsed-neutron logs provide an abundance of information that, if properly history matched, can go a long way toward improving our models of CCS reservoirs to better navigate both the economic and operational risks associated with these projects.