A112Vital conversations for student podiatrists: a ‘real’ simulated placement
Authors: Spencer Jess , Hamilton Carrie , Forss Rachel , Clarke Channine 
Published: October 2023

Background and aim:

It is recognized that clinical placements are sometimes limited for allied health professionals (AHPs) [1]. This, coupled with the ‘People Plan’ [2], which highlights the need for increasing numbers of AHPs in the workforce, has led to considerations of alternatives to traditional clinical placements. We were approached by a podiatry undergraduate programme to assist with delivering a podiatry simulated placement, for BSc and separately for MSc podiatry students, each for three days, for the academic year 2022/2023.

Activity:

Development of the simulated placement took five weeks; it was collaborative, with input from HEI academics, subject specialists, and simulation-based educationalists. Six scenarios were created which aligned with the HCPC Standards of Proficiency for Podiatrists [3]. These reflected the breadth of experiences students might have experienced in a clinical placement; they focused on communication and behaviours. Actors were involved in playing the roles of simulated colleagues, patients, and relatives, with experienced facilitators setting up a safe, non-threatening, immersive learning environment, covering triggers and time outs in the pre-brief. The following were areas covered:

Scope of practice and autonomous practice
Professional judgement
Culture, equality, diversity and non-discriminatory practice
Confidentiality and professionalism
Team working
Communication skills, face to face and telephone
Safe practice environments

Scope of practice and autonomous practice

Professional judgement

Culture, equality, diversity and non-discriminatory practice

Confidentiality and professionalism

Team working

Communication skills, face to face and telephone

Safe practice environments

The learning was underpinned by a communication skills framework enabling students to structure their conversations and behaviours appropriately. Reflection was used post debrief and explored the subsequent day. All scenarios were presented as either forum theatre or fishbowl simulation, with all students being present in the same space as the simulation.

Findings:

Evaluation was positive from both BSc and MSc groups. Students highly rated the structured approach provided by the communication framework stating it helped them converse effectively and build rapport with patients, relatives and colleagues. The inclusion of actors, although daunting for some initially, added hugely to their learning experience. Students commented on how they felt more prepared for real-world situations and how they hadn’t appreciated the breadth and impact of their practice.

Conclusion:

Simulated placements can offer a safe and controlled environment for podiatry students to develop their skills and engage in vital conversations with patients, relatives and colleagues. Facilitators should adapt to different confidence levels and learning styles of the students and actors fully briefed and in line with these adaptations. These simulated real-life placements are replicable and can help in preparing a workforce fit for purpose.

Ethics statement:

Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.