B-297 Tacrolimus Concentrations in Envarsus vs Prograf Patients: An Evaluation of the Clinical Impact of LC-MS/MS and Immunoassay Methods on Tacrolimus measurement
Authors: Alabi A , Ge M , Fitzgerald R , Suhandynata R T 
Published: October 2024

Background

Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor used as part of an immunosuppressive regimen in kidney and liver transplant patients to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and requires therapeutic drug monitoring due to its narrow therapeutic index. Tacrolimus levels are commonly measured using two different methodologies - immunoassay and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). A global proficiency study to assess and compare the measurement of trough levels by these two methodologies noted a positive bias with the ARCHITECT immunoassay which is likely due to the presence of tacrolimus metabolites. The aim of our study is to assess the impact of two different formulations of tacrolimus on the accuracy of its analytical measurement. While differences between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS results have been evaluated for immediate-release tacrolimus (Prograf), it has yet to be characterized for extended-release formulations such as Envarsus. The discrepancy between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS has clinical implications, as dosage modifications are based on measured concentrations, analytical variation may cause intervals of subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic exposure, increasing the risk of graft rejection or toxicity.

Methods

Development of an LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus and its major metabolite, desmethyl tacrolimus, was performed in whole blood. Traceable calibrators and quality control material for tacrolimus and specimens supplemented with desmethyl tacrolimus were used to determine accuracy and precision. Tacrolimus concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS and ARCHITECT immunoassay methods in excess whole blood specimens from patients treated with either Prograf or Envarsus. Measurement biases between LC-MS/MS and immunoassay methodologies were determined for both formulations of tacrolimus.

Results

External calibration curves for both tacrolimus and desmethyl tacrolimus were linear (R2&gt;0.995), and the analytical measurement range (AMR) for tacrolimus spanned from 1.1 - 31.6 ng/ml. Calibrator and Quality control (QC) biases were within 15% of their target values throughout the AMR and within-run imprecision was less than 10% (n=25) for all calibrators and QCs. Between-run imprecision for Low, Mid, and High QC levels over a period of 2 weeks (n=5 days) was less than 10%. Comparative bias of tacrolimus concentrations between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS was significantly lower (P value=0.0074) for Envarsus (n=20 specimens) relative to Prograf (n=32 specimens).

Conclusions

The differential bias between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS in the measurement of tacrolimus in patients dosed with immediate-release versus extended-release formulations suggests that their distinct pharmacokinetic profile may impact the accuracy of the measurement. Therefore, applying observed measurement biases from different assays derived from Prograf patients to Envarsus patients and vice versa may result in erroneous estimation of tacrolimus concentrations.