76 Differential Performance in Visual Learning and Retrieval in a Validity Controlled Chronic Pain Sample
Authors: Yin Tse Phoebe Ka , Gonzalez Christopher , Basurto Karen S , Resch Zachary J , Soble Jason R , Jennette Kyle J 
Published: December 2023

Objective:

Individuals with chronic pain frequently report diminished cognitive functioning. Prior cross-sectional studies have demonstrated strong associations between chronic pain and neurocognitive impairment, most notably in memory, attention, processing speed, and executive functioning. However, there is a paucity of research evaluating visual learning and memory abilities in this population. Further, while current practice standards advocate for the use of performance validity tests (PVTs) to assess the credibility of neuropsychological test performance, they have infrequently been incorporated into studies examining chronic pain samples, despite a higher observed rate of noncredible performance in the literature. This study aimed to compare visual learning and memory performance between a mixed neuropsychiatric (MNP) group and a chronic pain group in a validity-controlled sample.

Participants and Methods:

The study consisted of 371 adults referred for outpatient neuropsychological evaluation. Between groups, various PVTs were administered, which included, at minimum, one freestanding and four embedded PVTs. All patients were administered the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Only patients classified as valid performers (<1 PVT fails; n=295) were included in the analyses (Pain: n=109; MNP: n=186). The overall sample was 69% female and racially diverse (22% non-Hispanic Black, 43% non-Hispanic White, 30% Hispanic, 3% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 2% other race/ethnicities), with a mean age of 46.8 (SD=14.8) and mean education of 13.7 years (SD=2.7). Independent samples t-tests were performed to investigate the differences in visual learning and memory abilities between the chronic pain and MNP groups.

Results:

Chi-square analyses revealed significant differences between the pain and MNP groups on race, with more non-Hispanic White and Hispanic patients represented in the MNP group. There were also modest group differences in age and education. For the chronic pain group, patients scored lower on both BVMT-R Total T-Score (mean difference = 9.65T, p<.001) and BVMT Delayed Recall T-Score (mean difference = 8.97T, p<.001). The effect size was robust for both for Total T-Score (d = 0.682) and Delayed Recall T-Score (d = 0.632). In contrast, the difference in BVMT Recognition Discriminability was not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrated significant differences in performance between mixed neuropsychiatric and chronic pain patients. Preliminary evidence indicated that chronic pain patients displayed lower visual mediated encoding and retrieval performance, although their recognition is comparable. Although the nature of this study was targeted toward visual learning and retrieval, it is likely that the known impact of chronic pain on attention, working memory, and processing speed accounts for this relationship. Future studies will benefit from further elucidating these potential mechanisms and better inform clinical decision-making and neuropsychological testing performance in patients with chronic pain.