STATE OF HAEMODYNAMICS AND OXYGEN BUDGET IN THE PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CONCOMITANT CARDIAC PATHOLOGY DURING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY SURGERY DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF SURGICAL ACCESS
Authors: Burianov O. A. , Vako D. I. , Khartanovych M. V. 
Published: October 2024

Summary. Aim. To compare the hemodynamic status and oxygen budget in patients with osteoarthritis and comorbid cardiac pathology during total hip arthroplasty, based on the type of surgical approach used.
Materials and Methods. The study analyzed the treatment outcomes of 90 patients with stage 3-4 osteoarthritis of the hip who underwent total cemented hip arthroplasty. All patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach (traditional posterior or modified posterior). The study was conducted at the following stages: before surgery, immediately after surgery, 24 hours post-surgery, and one week after surgery. The following parameters were recorded: hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and central venous pressure) and oxygen budget parameters (hemoglobin (Hb), lactate, hematocrit (Ht), oxygen saturation of hemoglobin in arterial and venous blood (SaO2 and SvO2), partial pressure of oxygen in arterial and venous blood (paO2 and pvO2)). Based on these data, the following indices were calculated: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiac index (CI); oxygen content in arterial and venous blood (CaO2 and CvO2), arteriovenous oxygen content difference (C(a-v)O2), oxygen transport (TO2), oxygen consumption (VO2); systemic perfusion pressure (SPP), blood flow power (BFP), oxygen reserve (OR), and circulatory reserve (CR).
Results. The use of the modified posterior approach positively influenced hemodynamic parameters. After the surgery and on the 7th day post-surgery, SPP was significantly lower with the modified posterior approach. The CI was also significantly affected by the modified posterior approach. Throughout the study, except for the first stage, CI was significantly higher when using the modified posterior approach. LVEF increased significantly with both approaches, but on the 7th day post-surgery, it was significantly higher in the second group. BFP did not statistically differ between the two groups throughout the study, but its energy efficiency was lower, primarily due to the arteriovenous oxygen content difference (C(a-v)O2). C(a-v)O2 was the same before surgery for both approaches. At subsequent stages of the study, the differences between the groups increased, and on the 7th day, they were the most significant, with C(a-v)O2 being lower after using the modified posterior approach. The energy efficiency of blood flow was assessed by calculating OR and CR. Both indicators were significantly higher during the study, except at the preoperative stage, when using the modified posterior approach.
Conclusions. Our study clearly demonstrates the benefits of implementing the modified posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis and comorbid cardiac pathology. This approach improves hemodynamic and oxygen budget parameters compared to the traditional approach, which can significantly impact treatment outcomes for patients with cardiac comorbidity and reduce the number of postoperative complications.