Derivation and validation of a type 2 diabetes treatment selection algorithm for SGLT2-inhibitor and DPP4-inhibitor therapies based on glucose-lowering efficacy: cohort study using trial and routine clinical data
Authors: Dennis John M , Young Katherine G , McGovern Andrew P , Mateen Bilal A , Vollmer Sebastian J , Simpson Michael D , Henley William E , Holman Rury R , Sattar Naveed , Pearson Ewan R , Hattersley Andrew T , Jones Angus G , Shields Beverley M 
Published: November 2021

Objective

To establish whether clinical patient characteristics routinely measured in primary care can identify people with differing short-term benefits and risks for SGLT2-inhibitor and DPP4-inhibitor therapies, and to derive and validate a treatment selection algorithm to identify the likely optimal therapy for individual patients.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Routine clinical data from United Kingdom general practice (Clinical Practice Research Datalink [CPRD]), and individual-level clinical trial data from 14 multi-country trials of SGLT2-inhibitor and DPP4-inhibitor therapies.

Participants

26,877 new users of SGLT2-inhibitor and DPP4-inhibitor therapy in CPRD over 2013-2019, and 10,414 participants randomised to SGLT2-inhibitor or DPP4-inhibitor therapy in 14 clinical trials, including 3 head-to-head trials of the two therapies (n=2,499).

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was achieved HbA1c 6 months after initiating therapy. Clinical features associated with differential HbA1c outcomes with SGLT2-inhibitor and DPP4-inhibitor therapies were identified in routine clinical data, with associations then tested in trial data. A multivariable treatment selection algorithm to predict differential HbA1c outcomes was developed in a CPRD derivation cohort (n=14,069), with validation in a CPRD validation cohort (n=9,376) and the head-to-head trials. In CPRD, we further explored the relationship between model predictions and secondary outcomes of weight loss and treatment discontinuation.

Results

The final treatment selection algorithm included HbA1c, eGFR, ALT, age, and BMI, which were identified as predictors of differential HbA1c outcomes with SGLT2-inhibitor and DPP4-inhibitor therapies using both routine and trial data. In validation cohorts, patient strata predicted to have a ≥5 mmol/mol HbA1c reduction with SGLT2-inhibitor therapy compared with DPP4-inhibitor therapy (38.8% of CPRD validation sample) had an observed greater reduction of 8.8 mmol/mol [95%CI 7.8-9.8] in the CPRD validation sample, a 5.8 mmol/mol (95%CI 3.9-7.7) greater reduction in the Cantata D/D2 trials, and a 6.6 mmol/mol [95%CI 2.2-11.0]) greater reduction in the BI1245.20 trial. In CPRD, there was a greater weight reduction with SGLT2-inhibitor therapy regardless of predicted glycaemic benefit. Strata predicted to have greater reduction in HbA1c on SGLT2-inhibitor therapy had a similar risk of discontinuation as on DPP4-inhibitor therapy. In contrast, strata predicted to have greater reduction in HbA1c with DPP4-inhibitor therapy were half as likely to discontinue DPP4-inhibitor therapy than SGLT2-inhibitor therapy.

Conclusions

Routinely measured clinical features are robustly associated with differential glycaemic responses to SGLT2-inhibitor and DPP4-inhibitor therapies. Combining features into a treatment selection algorithm can inform clinical decisions concerning optimal type 2 diabetes treatment choices.

Key messages

What is already known on this subject

Despite there being multiple glucose-lowering treatment options available for people with type 2 diabetes, current guidelines do not provide clear advice on selecting the optimal treatment for most patients.

It is unknown whether routinely measured clinical features modify the risks and benefits of two common treatment options, DPP4-inhibitor or SGLT2-inhibitor therapy, and which could be used to target these treatments to those patients most likely to benefit.

What this study adds

Using data from 10,414 participants in 14 randomised trials, and 26,877 patients in UK primary care, we show several routinely available clinical features, notably glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and kidney function, are robustly associated with differential HbA1c responses to initiating SGLT2-inhibitor and DPP4-inhibitor therapies.

Combining clinical features into a multivariable treatment selection model identifies validated patient strata with 1) a >5 mmol/mol HbA1c benefit for SGLT2-i therapy compared with DPP4-inhibitor therapy ; 2) a 50% reduced risk of early treatment discontinuation with DPP4-inhibitor therapy compared with SGLT2-inhibitor therapy.

Our findings demonstrate a precision medicine approach based on routine clinical features can inform clinical decisions concerning optimal type 2 diabetes treatment choices.