bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025 huggingface dataset:
Evaluation of an individualized starting-dose of niraparib in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study.
Authors: Mirza Mansoor Raza , Gonzalez Martin Antonio , Graybill Whitney , O'Malley David M. , Gaba Lydia , Yap Oi Wah S. , Guerra Eva M. , Rose Peter Graham , Baurain Jean-Francois , Ghamande Sharad A. , denys Hannelore , Prendergast Emily , Pisano Carmela , Follana Philippe , Baumann Klaus , Calvert Paula , Korach Jacob , Li Yong , Gupta Divya , Monk Bradley J.
Published: May 2020

6050

Background: Niraparib is approved at a fixed starting dose (FSD) of 300 mg QD for maintenance treatment of patients (pts) with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) achieving a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy based in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA study. A post-hoc analysis of NOVA showed baseline bodyweight (BW) and platelet count (PC) were predictive for hematologic toxicities and dose reductions. Following this analysis, the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study was amended to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study randomized 733 pts with newly diagnosed advanced OC with a complete or partial response to first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy. The protocol was amended to change the dose from 300 mg FSD for all patients to an ISD regimen: 200 mg QD in pts with BW <77 kg and/or PC <150,000/µL or 300 mg QD in pts with BW ≥77 kg and PC ≥150,000/µL. Exposure, efficacy, and safety data were compared between patients treated with FSD vs ISD. Results: Efficacy in the ISD subgroup was comparable to the FSD subgroup relative to placebo (Table). An interaction test showed no treatment difference between ISD and FSD at the pre-specified 0.10 significance level ( p=0.30). Medians for dose intensity and relative dose intensity in pts who received niraparib were similar. The overall safety profile among pts in the niraparib arm (n=484), including grade ≥3 hematologic toxicities, improved with the ISD. Conclusions: The ISD in the 1L maintenance setting provides comparable efficacy to the FSD while reducing the risk of hematologic toxicities. No new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT02655016. [Table: see text]
Niraparib exposure-response relationship in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (AOC).
Authors: Monk Bradley J. , Romero Ignacio , Graybill Whitney , Churruca Cristina , O'Malley David M. , Lund Bente , Yap Oi Wah S. , Baurain Jean-Francois , Rose Peter Graham , denys Hannelore , Ghamande Sharad A. , Pisano Carmela , Fabbro Michel , Braicu Elena Ioana , Calvert Paula , Amit Amnon , Prendergast Emily , Milton Ashley , Zhang Zhi-Yi , Gonzalez Martin Antonio
Published: May 2020

6051

Background: Niraparib improves progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with newly diagnosed AOC after complete or partial response to first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. In the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (PRIMA) trial, pts were treated with a fixed starting dose (FSD) of 300 mg QD until a protocol amendment introduced the individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen: 200 mg QD for pts with baseline bodyweight (BW) < 77 kg and/or platelet count (PC) < 150,000/µL, or 300 mg QD for pts with baseline BW ≥77 kg and PC ≥150,000/µL. Here, we developed a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model for niraparib and evaluated exposure-response relationships for pts receiving niraparib using safety and efficacy data from PRIMA. Methods: The PopPK model for niraparib was developed based on 7418 plasma samples from 1442 pts from 4 studies: PN001, NOVA, QUADRA, and PRIMA. PRIMA PK samples were collected on cycle 1, day 1 (C1D1), C2D1 pre-dose and 2 h post-dose, C4D1, and C8D1 pre-dose (or EOT if patient discontinued before C8D1). The relationship between PopPK model-based prospective exposure (average concentration [ Cave] until progression/death) and efficacy (PFS) were evaluated in pts receiving niraparib in both the homologous-recombination deficient (HRd) and overall population. The relationship between model-predicted exposure metrics and incidence of clinically relevant adverse events (AEs) was analyzed using univariate logistic regression in pts receiving niraparib. Results: Of 484 pts receiving niraparib in PRIMA, 480 had PK data and were included in the efficacy and safety analysis. The safety exposure-response showed significant associations ( p≤0.0128) between increasing niraparib exposure and increasing probability of experiencing any-grade and grade ≥3 AEs, except grade ≥3 hypertension. The incidence of AEs, including thrombocytopenia, was lower in pts who received a 200-mg ISD. Efficacy was not compromised in these pts. Conclusions: Niraparib exposure was associated with increased risk of select AEs. However, the ISD regimen decreased AE risk without compromising efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT02655016.
Cediranib in combination with olaparib in patients without a germline BRCA1/2 mutation with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: Phase IIb CONCERTO trial.
Authors: Lee Jung-min , Moore Richard G. , Ghamande Sharad A. , Park Min S. , Diaz John Paul , Chapman Julia A. , Kendrick James Erasmus , Slomovitz Brian M. , Tewari Krishnansu Sujata , Lowe Elizabeth S. , Milenkova Tsveta , Kumar Sanjeev , Dymond Mike , Kozarewa Iwanka , Liu Joyce F.
Published: May 2020

6056

Background: A Phase I trial (NCT01116648) of cediranib (cedi) in combination with olaparib (ola) (cedi + ola) demonstrated an overall response rate of 44% in patients (pts) with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC), including pts without a deleterious or suspected deleterious gBRCAm (non-gBRCAm; Liu et al. Eur J Cancer 2013). The subsequent Phase II trial (NCT01116648) showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with cedi + ola versus ola monotherapy in recurrent platinum-sensitive OC pts, notably in non-gBRCAm pts (Liu et al. Lancet Oncol 2014). We report data from the Phase IIb, single-arm, open-label CONCERTO study investigating cedi + ola in non-gBRCAm pts with recurrent platinum-resistant OC who had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy for advanced OC (NCT02889900). Methods: Pts with disease progression <6 months from the last receipt of platinum-based chemotherapy received cedi tablets (30 mg once daily) plus ola tablets (200 mg twice daily) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. gBRCAm pts were ineligible. Primary endpoint: objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR; RECIST 1.1). Key secondary endpoints: PFS and safety. Results: 60 pts from the USA were included (median age: 64.5 years; median number of previous systemic treatment regimens: 4 [range: 2–9]; previous bevacizumab: 53). All pts had high-grade OC (90% serous; 3.3% clear cell; 3.3% endometrioid; 3.3% other). 7% of pts had tumor BRCA2 (confirmed somatic) mutations, 80% of pts had no tumor BRCA mutation (non-tBRCAm) and 13% of pts were not evaluable for tBRCAm. Five (8%) pts who were non-tBRCAm carried somatic homologous recombination repair gene mutations (FoundationOne Clinical Trial Assay, Foundation Medicine, Inc). The Table shows results of key endpoints. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) that occurred in pts were hypertension (30%), fatigue (22%) and diarrhea (13%). 37% of pts reported serious AEs, of which nausea (7%) was most common. Dose interruptions, reductions and discontinuations were caused by AEs in 55%, 18% and 18% of pts, respectively, who received cedi + ola. Conclusions: Cedi + ola showed evidence of antitumor activity in heavily pretreated non-gBRCAm pts with recurrent platinum-resistant OC. Toxicity was manageable with dose modifications. Clinical trial information: NCT02889900. [Table: see text]
The safety and efficacy of weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer who developed carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction in previous chemotherapy.
Authors: Nishikimi Kyoko , Tate Shinichi , Matsuoka Ayumu , Shozu Makio
Published: May 2020

6058

Background: Carboplatin (CBDCA) hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) often occur in patients with ovarian cancer. Once CBACA HSR occurs, it is difficult to use platinum even though the patients had platinum-sensitive disease and consequently the survival of the patients cannot be prolonged. We had administered weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy (wTP) for patients with ovarian cancer who developed CBDCA HSR in previous chemotherapy. We investigated the safety and efficacy of wTP. Methods: We investigated 86 patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma who developed CBDCA HSR in previous chemotherapy (paclitaxel/CBDCA) at our institution between 2011 and 2019. After premedication was administered, paclitaxel and sequentially CDDP were administered as one hour infusion, respectively (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, CDDP 25 mg/m2; 1, 8, 15 day/4 weeks). Results: The median cycle of the previous chemotherapy of CBDCA was 8 (interquartile range [IQR], 6–11). The grade of CBDCA HSR was 1 in 57 (66%), 2 in 26 (30%), and, 3 in 1 (1%) patient(s). WTP was administered for the first line in 21 (24%), second line in 35 (41%) and third or more line in 30 patients (34%). The median cycles of wTP administration was 4 (IQR, 3–7). We observed that severe CDDP HSR did not occur in any patients and 15 patients (17.4%, grade 1, 10 patients; grade 2, 5) developed CDDP HSR. All CDDP HSR were successfully managed with infusion interruption and Hydrocortisone Sodium Phosphate administration. There was no relation between the grade of CBDCA HSR in the previous chemotherapy and the rate of CDDP HSR (p = 0.363). Progression-free survival and overall survival after administration of wTP were 10.9 months (95% CI: 7.7–17.7) and 25.9 months (95%Ci: 19.0–50.2), respectively. Conclusions: 71 patients (82%) who developed CBDCA HSR in previous chemotherapy were able to continue administration of wTP without CDDP HSR. WTP was safe and effective for the patients who developed CBDCA HSR. [Table: see text]
Phase I/II study of weekly topotecan and gefitinib in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.
Authors: Chelariu- Raicu Anca , Levenback Charles F. , Slomovitz Brian M. , Bodurka Diane C. , Gershenson David Marc , Coleman Robert L.
Published: May 2020

6059

Background: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is expressed in many types of cancer. Fifty to 70% of epithelial ovarian can overexpress EGFR, and its expression has been correlated with poor prognosis features in many cases. While these tumors are chemosensitive to platinum-based therapy, chemoresistance often develops. We conducted a phase I/II trial to examine the efficacy, safety, and toxicity of gefitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with topotecan in women with recurrent ovarian cancer with EGFR receptor positivity (1+ or greater). Methods: Patients with measurable, recurrent or persistent cancer after treatment with a platinum and paclitaxel-containing regimen were eligible for this study (n = 19). We first used “run-in” dose escalation, in which a conventional 3+3 algorithm was used. Initial treatment was gefitinib 250 mg oral dose daily and topotecan at a dose of 2.0 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dose escalations were planned for topotecan (Dose Levels 1–3: 2, 3, 4 mg/m2) until the MTD was reached. Next, an additional 10 patients with refractory or progressive ovarian cancer were enrolled in the phase II study. Results: 19 patients received a total of 61 cycles. Median age was 60 years. Histological types of treated patients included 73% serous (n = 14), 12.5% mixed (n = 2), 12.5% transitional (n = 2) and 6.3% clear cell (n = 1). There were 3 patients treated at dose level 1, 3 patients at dose level 2, and 3 patients treated at dose level 3. The maximum tolerated dose was topotecan 4.0mg/m2 IV days 1, 8 and 15, and gefitinib 250mg p.o. QD x28 days. Therefore, dose level 3 was used for the Phase II portion of the trial. Of the 19 patients included in the phase I/II, 3 patients were inevaluable for response to therapy due to toxicity, missed therapy or decline in performance status. Of the 16 patients, 81% patients (n = 13) had progressive disease, 12.5% stable disease (n = 2), and 6% partial response (n = 1). We assessed all 19 patients for adverse events; 60% had treatment-related grade 3 events, primarily blood disorders such as anemia (n = 3, 16%), neutrophil count decrease (n = 4, 21%). Conclusions: This prospective phase I/II clinical trial failed to show sufficient clinical activity of topotecan in combination with gefitinib in patients with EGFR-positive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancers. The drug combination was relatively well-tolerated in this cohort. As such, the study did not proceed to the next accrual goal secondary to the lack of response. Clinical trial information: NCT00317772.
Effect on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer by inhibiting the GAS6/AXL pathway and inducing homologous recombination deficiency.
Authors: Mullen Mary M , Lomonosova Elena , Toboni Michael Driscoll , Noia Hollie M , Wilke Danny , Oplt Alyssa , Guo Lei , Kuroki Lindsay M , Hagemann Andrea R. , McCourt Carolyn K , Thaker Premal H. , Mutch David Gardner , Powell Matthew A. , Fuh Katherine Cynthia
Published: May 2020

6080

Background: Less than 10% of patients with high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) have a complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to identify a biomarker predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to determine if GAS6/AXL inhibition with AVB500 (AVB) could increase platinum response. Methods: AVB was supplied by Aravive Biologics. HGSC tumor samples were obtained pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. GAS6 expression was measured by tissue immunohistochemistry (IHC) and serum ELISA. Four HGSC cell lines were used for all experiments. Immunofluorescent (IF) assays targeting ɣH2AX for DNA damage, RAD51, BRCA1, and BRCA2 for homologous recombination (HR) and 53BP1 for non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) were performed. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate RPA binding. DNA fiber assays were performed. In vitro clonogenic assays were done on chemoresistant ovarian tumor cells treated with carboplatin (carbo) +/- AVB and olaparib +/- AVB. Synergy assays were analyzed using Combenefit software. Mouse models were used to evaluate the combination of carboplatin + AVB and olaparib + AVB on tumor burden. Results: Patients with high pretreatment tumor GAS6 IHC expression ( > 85%) or serum GAS6 concentrations ( > 25ng/mL) were more likely to have a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than those with low GAS6 (P = 0.002). Additionally, high GAS6 concentration was associated with decreased overall survival (24.4 months versus undefined, P = 0.009). Carbo + AVB resulted in decreased clonogenic colonies compared to carbo alone (p < 0.05). In vivo tumor mouse models treated with chemotherapy + AVB had significantly less tumor burden than those treated with chemotherapy alone (50mg vs 357mg, P = 0.003). We identified an induction in HR deficiency by a decrease in RAD51, BRCA1, and BRCA2 foci and RPA binding in cells treated with carbo + AVB compared to carbo (P < 0.05). There was increase in ɣH2AX and 53BP1 foci as well as replication fork slowing in tumor cells treated with carboplatin + AVB (P < 0.01). We also AVB and carboplatin were synergistic. Olaparib + AVB resulted in decreased clonogenic colonies (P < 0.05) and decreased tumor burden in mouse models (76mg vs 171mg, P = 0.03) compared to olaparib alone. Conclusions: GAS6 is a potential biomarker predictive of poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HGSC. Inhibition of this GAS6/AXL pathway with AVB improves sensitivity to traditional neoadjuvant chemotherapy by inducing a homologous recombination deficiency.
Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients (pts) with previously treated metastatic endometrial cancer (mEC): results from a phase I/II study.
Authors: Santin Alessandro , Komiya Takefumi , Goldenberg David M. , Sharkey Robert M. , Hong Quan , Wegener William A. , Goswami Trishna , Bardia Aditya
Published: May 2020

6081

Background: Unselected pts with EC who progressed on prior chemotherapy have a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. SG is a novel antibody-drug conjugate that targets Trop-2, a cell surface glycoprotein highly expressed in many epithelial tumors. It is conjugated to deliver SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, via a proprietary hydrolyzable linker. Preclinical studies show SG has activity against chemotherapy-resistant EC and significant bystander effect against EC with heterogenous Trop-2 expression (Perrone E. Mol Oncol. 2019). Methods: The phase I/II basket study (NCT01631552) evaluated pts unselected for Trop-2 with advanced solid tumors who received intravenous SG (days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles), until progression or unacceptable toxicity. CT/MRI scans were obtained at 8-week intervals for response assessment by RECIST 1.1. We report results for mEC pts who progressed after ≥1 prior systemic therapy and were treated with SG 10 mg/kg. Endpoints include safety, objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 18 mEC pts (all women; 17 white and 1 black; median age 69 years [range, 41–76]) had a median 3.5 (range 2–6) prior lines of therapy. All pts received prior treatment with platinum therapies. At a median follow-up of 12.7 months, the ORR (95% CI) was 22.2% (6.4–47.6), with 4 partial responses. CBR (95% CI) was 44.4% (21.5–69.2), with 8 of 18 pts having either an objective response or stable disease ≥6 months. The DOR of responders ranged from 9.1 to 26.6 months, with 2 of 4 responders having a duration of ≥18 months. Median PFS (95% CI) was 3.2 months (1.9–9.4), and median OS (95% CI) was 11.9 months (4.7–not calculable). Key grade ≥3 TRAEs in the overall basket study safety population (n=495) included neutropenia (28%), neutrophil count decrease (14%), anemia (10%), diarrhea (8%), fatigue (6%), and febrile neutropenia (5%). A similar safety profile was seen in the mEC cohort. Conclusions: Median OS in unselected pts with mEC who progressed on prior platinum therapy is ~10 months with an ORR of ~10%. SG monotherapy showed clinical activity in pts with relapsed/refractory mEC, consistent with previous preclinical findings, and support further clinical investigation (NCT04251416). The phase II TROPiCS-03 (NCT03964727) study in pts with metastatic solid tumors selected based on elevated Trop-2 expression by a validated IHC assay will also provide further insights. Clinical trial information: NCT01631552.
Clinical outcomes of MSI-high (MSI-H) versus stable (MSS) endometrial carcinoma (EC) after front-line platinum chemotherapy and subsequent matched therapy.
Authors: Ngoi Natalie , Sachdeva Manavi , Haran Prevathi , Lim Diana , Heong Valerie , Lim Yi Wan , Eng Lim Siew , Tham Kah Wieng , Wong Andrea , Zhong Sophia , Nathan Santhiay , Tong Pearl , Low Jeffrey , Ng Joseph , Arunachalam Ilancheran , Tan David Shao Peng
Published: May 2020

6086

Background: Precision oncology approaches in EC patients (pts) are evolving with emerging targeted therapy. We reviewed the effect of genomic findings on treatment choice and outcome in an Asian EC cohort. Methods: Recurrent or metastatic ECs were prospectively profiled with next-generation sequencing (NGS) and relevant immunohistochemistry. Clinical data were collected to assess outcomes. Results: Between 12/2014 to 12/2019, 51 Asian EC pts of endometrioid (26/51), serous (7/51), carcinosarcoma (4/51), clear cell (4/51) and mixed (10/51) histology were enrolled. 35/51(69%) of tumors were high grade. The median age at diagnosis was 56 (range 37-77), and the median lines of treatment received was 3 (range 1-8). 45/51(88%) of pts had successful NGS profiling, 31/45(69%) using FoundationOne CDx, and 14/45 (31%) on an in-house platform. Frequent mutations (>20%) occurred in PTEN (60%), PIK3CA (49%), TP53 (46%), ARID1A (27%), CTNNB1 (24%) and KRAS (22%). There were 12/51(24%) MSI-H, 25/51(49%) MSS, and 14/51(27%) MSI-unknown tumors. The 6 mth progression free survival (PFS) rate for MSS versus MSI-H pts treated with front-line carboplatin+paclitaxel (CP) was 83% versus 50% (RR 1.67, fisher’s exact 2-sided p=0.09), with a shorter median PFS after 1st line CP for MSI-H versus MSS pts (median 5.2 mth vs. 8.3 mth, not sig). Upon progression, 29/51(57%) of pts were matched to therapy based on tumor profiles. Of these, 7/29(24%), 13/29(45%) and 9/29(31%) matched to anti-PD1/PD-L1, endocrine therapy and other targeted therapy, respectively. Among 7 MSI-H pts matched to anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy, median PFS was 14.6 mth (95% CI 0.4-29), and objective response rate was 57%(4/7). In subsequent-line, matching to endocrine therapy (HR 4.3 95% CI 0.95-19.0, p=0.06) or other targeted therapy (HR 5.1, 95% CI 1.1-24.5, p=0.04) was associated with worse PFS compared to anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy. Despite a short median PFS after front-line CP, median overall survival (OS) was not reached for MSI-H pts, compared to 38 mth (95% CI 30.7-46.0) for MSS and MSI-unknown pts. Conclusions: MSI-H EC pts appear to have shorter PFS to front-line CP chemotherapy compared with MSS pts, but may derive durable responses from immunotherapy in subsequent-line therapy. Early use of immunotherapy in advanced MSI-H EC pts should be considered. Further optimisation of therapy is urgently needed in advanced MSS EC.
Combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with rare gynaecological malignancies.
Authors: Klein Oliver , Kee Damien , Gao Bo , Markman Ben , Mileshkin Linda R. , Scott Clare L. , So Yeojeong , Linklater Richelle , Behren Andreas , Palmer Jodie , Carlino Matteo S. , Cebon Jonathan S.
Published: May 2020

6091

Background: Up to 50% of gynecological cancers are considered rare. The outcome of these patients (pts) is poor given a lack of scientific and clinical knowledge. Immunotherapy using single agent anti- PD-1/PD-L1 treatment (tx) has shown only modest activity in patients with common gynecological malignancies, such as high grade serous ovarian cancer (ca) and microsatellite stable endometrial ca. Combined CTLA-4/PD-1 blockade using ipilimumab (ipi) and nivolumab (nivo) has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to single agent anti-PD-1 therapy in pts with advanced melanoma and renal cell ca. To date, no trials have been undertaken with ipi/nivo in patients with rare gynecological malignancies. Methods: 41 pts with advanced rare gynecological malignancies were enrolled into the CA209-538 trial. Pts received nivo 3mg/kg and ipi 1mg/kg q 3 weekly for four doses, followed by nivo 3mg/kg q 2 weekly. Tx continued for up to 96 weeks, or until disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxicity. Response (RECIST 1.1) was assessed every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR +PR + SD). Exploratory endpoints include correlation of efficacy with biomarkers (incl PD-L1/TMB). Results: Pts with 10 rare tumor types were enrolled (Table). 39/41 pts have received prior therapy (1-7 lines). Objective responses were observed in 11 pts (27%) including pts with vaginal SCC, ovarian clear cell and low grade serous ca, ovarian and uterine carcinosarcoma, uterine clear cell, uterine serous ca and leiomyosarcoma. A further 9 pts had SD as their best radiological response resulting in a CBR of 49%. The median duration of response had not been reached (range 3.5 – 25+ months) with seven responses being ongoing. 63% of pts experienced an immune related adverse event (irAEs) with 4 pts developing Grade 3/4 irAEs. Conclusions: Ipi/Nivo tx demonstrates efficacy in a range of different rare gynecological cancers with a significant number of durable responses being observed. Tumor agnostic biomarkers are required to assist with better patient selection. Clinical trial information: NCT02923934. [Table: see text]
Genomic and transcriptomic profiles of gynecologic neuroendocrine carcinoma are distinct from pulmonary neuroendocrine small cell carcinoma.
Authors: Mahdi Haider , Joehlin-Price Amy , Dowlati Afshin , Abbas Ata
Published: May 2020

6093

Background: High-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the cervix and other gynecologic origins are rare and aggressive cancers that unfortunately affect young women with high mortality. Treatment recommendations are often extrapolated from their counterpart, small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCLC). In the present study, we have performed comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analyses in a cohort of patients with NEC of the cervix and other gynecologic origins and compared them to SCLC. Methods: We have identified 27 patients diagnosed with NEC of gynecologic origin from 1998-2019. Of them, we were able to obtain archival tissue from 14 patients (17 samples), including seven cervical NEC, three ovarian NEC, and two endometrial NEC. Two ovarian and one cervical patient have recurrent tumors. Whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-seq were successfully performed in 14 and 13 samples, respectively. BWA-MEM was used for mapping (hg38), and GATK Haplotype Caller was used for WES analysis. Ensemble-VEP was used for variant annotation, and SIFT and PolyPhen-2 were used for pathogenic prediction of missense mutations. Stranded pair-end RNA-seq data were analyzed using STAR and DESeq2. SCLC data from cBioPortal and EBI (accession number EGAS00001000334) were used to compare mutation and transcriptomic profiles. Results: We found that TP53 is not mutated in our cohort, and RB1 is mutated only in 1 (7%) tumor. TP53 and RB1 are the most frequently mutated genes in small cell lung carcinoma. However, LRP1B, the third most mutated gene in SCLC was also mutated in 4 (29%) tumors. We observed that WNT, RTK-RAS, NOTCH, and MYC are among the top mutated pathways in our cohort. Among the top 20 mutated genes, only four genes, MUC4, KMT2C, MAP3K1, and HLA-A, were common in cervical, ovarian, and endometrial tumors suggesting a high diversity within the NEC of gynecologic origin. Our RNA-seq analysis revealed a distinct transcriptional signature when compared to SCLC, especially the expression pattern of SCLC molecular subtypes defining ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU3F2, and YAP1 genes. Surprisingly, we observed a high expression of the YAP1 gene in all of the 13 tumors. However, the YAP1+ subtype represents a minority in SCLC and known to predict chemotherapy resistance and lower survival. Conclusions: Our results suggest a unique mutational profile and transcriptional signature that are distinct compared to SCLC tumors. Therefore, there is an urgent need to re-evaluate the therapeutic options and targets for NEC of gynecologic origin.
Randomized phase II study of axitinib versus observation in patients with recurred or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Authors: Keam Bhumsuk , Kang Eun Joo , Ahn Myung-Ju , Ock Chan-Young , Lee Keun Wook , Kwon Jung Hye , Yang Yaewon , Choi Yoon Hee , Kim Min Kyoung , Ji Jun Ho , Yun Tak , Nam Byung-Ho , Kim Sung-Bae
Published: May 2020

6503

Background: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) does not respond to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Several anti-angiogenic agents were evaluated in single arm phase II trials. However, the role of chemotherapy is still controversial, because of natural stable disease course without chemotherapy and lack of randomized trial. We firstly conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of axitinib compared to observation. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective phase II trial, we enrolled recurred, metastatic ACC patients who progressed within 9 months. Patients were randomly assigned either axitinib (5mg twice daily) or observation arm with 1:1 ratio. Crossover to the axitinib arm was permitted for patients in the observation arm who had disease progression. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), PFS, duration of response and adverse events. Results: A total of 60 patients randomly allocated to axitinib (N=30) and observation arm (N=30) and response evaluation was conducted in 57 patients. With a median follow-up of 25.4 months, the 6-month PFS rate was 73.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.8 to 88.1%) in the axitinib arm and 23.2% (95% CI, 9.3 to 41.1%) in the observation arm (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.45; P < 0.001). Median PFS was 10.8 months in axitinib arm and 2.8 months in observation arm ( P < 0.001). The ORR was 3.3% (95% CI, 0.1 to 17.2%) in the axitinib arm, and 0% (95% CI, 0 to 12.8%) in the observation arm. The disease control rate was 100% (95% CI, 88.4 to 100%) in the axitinib arm and 51.9% (95% CI, 32.0 to 71.3%) in the observation arm. After crossover, ORR of axitinib in the observation arm was 11.1% (95% CI, 2.4 to 29.2%). Median OS was not reached in axitinib arm, 28.5 months in observation arm ( P = 0.688). The most frequently reported adverse events of axitinib were grade 1 or 2 oral mucositis and fatigue. Detailed data of adverse events and mutational profile data will be presented. Conclusions: In this first randomized trial in patients with recurred or metastatic ACC, axitinib significantly increased 6-month PFS rate compared to observation. Clinical trial information: NCT02859012 .
Low-cost oral metronomic versus intravenous chemotherapy in recurrent, inoperable and metastatic head and neck cancer: Phase III Metro-CIS study.
Authors: Menon Nandini Sharrel , Noronha Vanita , Patil Vijay Maruti , Dhumal Sachin Babanrao , Joshi Amit , Sable Nilesh , Kumar Suman , Mahajan Abhishek , Bhattacharjee Atanu , Banavali Shripad Dinanath , Prabhash Kumar
Published: May 2020

6506

Background: The NCCN preferred regimens for palliation in head and neck cancer, either EXTREME or KEYNOTE-048 are the only two regimens which have improved outcomes over chemotherapy, but they have limited applicability (1-3%) in low and middle-income countries due to the cost. Oral metronomic chemotherapy (OMC) has shown better outcomes than intravenous cisplatin; these results were obtained with a low incidence of adverse events and the cost of 1/100th of NCCN-preferred regimens in a Phase II study. Methods: This was a randomized Phase III non-inferiority open-label study. Adult patients with relapsed-recurrent or metastatic upfront palliatively treated squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck and ECOG PS 0-1 were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1 between OMC (oral methotrexate 15 mg/m2 weekly with celecoxib 200 mg once daily or intravenous cisplatin (IVC) 75 mg/m2, 3-weekly for 6 cycles. CTCAE version 4.0 was used for adverse event recording. Response assessment (RECIST version 1.1) was performed every 2 months. EORTC QLQ-C 30 and EORTC QLQ -H&N 35 questionnaires were self-administered at baseline and 2-monthly thereafter. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and was measured from the date of randomization to death. Assuming a 6-month OS in IVC arm of 40%, the non-inferiority margin of 13%, type 1 error of 5% (2-sided), type 2 error of 20% and lost-to-follow up rate of 20%, a total sample size of 422 subjects was required. Kaplan Meier method was used for the estimation of OS and progression-free survival (PFS). To determine non-inferiority the upper limit of 95% CI of difference between 6 months OS of the 2 arms had to be below 13%. Results: In the intention to treat analysis, the 6-months OS was 50.89% (95% CI, 43.3-57.97) and 62.26% (95% CI, 54.72-68.9) in the IVC and OMC arm respectively. The difference in 6-months OS between the 2 arms was - 11.37% (95% CI, -20.77 to -0.97). The median OS was 6.1 (95% CI, 5.33-6.93) versus 7.5 (95% CI, 6.5-8.8) months in IVC arm and OMC arm respectively ( P= .026). The unadjusted hazard ratio for death was 0.773 (95% CI, 0.615-0.97, P= .026). The median PFS was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.47-2.03) versus 3.23 (95% CI, 2.57-4.13) months in IVC and OMC arms respectively ( P< 0.001). Any grade 3 or above adverse events were seen in 61 (30.2%) versus 37 (18.9%) patients in IVC and OMC arm respectively ( P= .01). Conclusions: OMC improves outcomes in palliatively treated head and neck cancer and is a new standard of care in this setting, in addition to the EXTREME and KEYNOTE-048 regimen. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2015/11/006388 .
A phase II study of nivolumab (N) plus ipilimumab (I) in radioidine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR DTC) with exploratory cohorts in anaplastic (ATC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC).
Authors: Lorch Jochen H. , Barletta Justine A. , Nehs Matthew , Uppaluri Ravindra , Alexander Erik K. , Haddad Robert I. , Hanna Glenn J. , Margalit Danielle Nina , Tishler Roy B. , Schoenfeld Jonathan Daniel , Goguen Laura A , Jabiev Azad , Sorensen Meredith J , Ahmadi Sara , Marqusee Ellen , Kim Matthew I , Stanizzi Darren , Harris Ethan , Kacew Alec , Barbie David Allen
Published: May 2020

6513

Background: Treatment options for aggressive TC are limited. Pre-clinical data suggests efficacy of CTLA-4 plus PD-1 blockade in aggressive RAIR TC. Methods: This investigator initiated phase II study tested N (3mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus I (1mg/kg every 6 weeks) until disease progression or completion of 24 mo of treatment in RAIR differentiated TC including poorly differentiated TC (PDTC) with exploratory cohorts in anaplastic (ATC) and medullary TC (MTC). Radiographic response rate by RECIST v1.1 (CR+PR) was primary endpoint. At least 6 pts with disease response among n=32 DTC provided 84% power to distinguish between a 10% and a 25% RR (one-sided 9% binomial test). Results: Accrual is complete with n=32 patients with DTC, 10 with ATC and 7 with MTC enrolled between October 2017 and May 2019. Thirty-two DTC included: n=17 papillary, n=7 Hurthle, n=4 follicular TC, n=4 PDTC. Among n=49, median (range) age was 65 (30-88), 51% (25/49) were female. To date, in DTC, 3/32 achieved a PR (n=2 Hurthle and n=1 PDTC), 9.4% RR (.95CI:2%-25%). One near complete response has been observed. Among pts w ATC, 3/ 10 profound PR by RECIST occurred (30% RR, .95CI: 7%-65%). Among them, two remain without clear evidence of disease at 26 and 13 mo after treatment start. No PR's were observed in MTC. Most frequent grade 3-4 TRAEs were as expected and included increased lipase (n=8), increased serum amylase (n=4). There was an unexpected number of treatment related adrenal insufficiency (AI) (n=4) which was associated with long PFS (range 10.1—16.4+mo). Conclusions: N+I appears to have considerable activity in ATC. In unselected RAIR DTC, activity was low but responses were seen in PDTC and Hurthle cell TC. Exceptional responses with prolonged remissions were observed. Clinical trial information: NCT03246958 .
Updated analysis of the inducible T-cell co-stimulatory receptor (ICOS) agonist, GSK3359609 (GSK609), combination with pembrolizumab (PE) in patients (pts) with anti-PD-1/L1 treatment-naïve head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
Authors: Angevin Eric , Groenland Stefanie L. , Lim Annette May Ling , Martin-Liberal Juan , Moreno Victor , Trigo Jose Manuel , Le Tourneau Christophe , Mathew Matthen , Cho Daniel C. , Hansen Aaron Richard , Vicente David , Maio Michele , Italiano Antoine , Bauman Jessica Ruth , Chisamore Michael Jon , Zhou Helen , Ellis Catherine Elizabeth , Ballas Marc S. , Hoos Axel , Rischin Danny
Published: May 2020

6517

Background: INDUCE-1 (NCT02723955) is a first-in-human study investigating GSK609, an IgG4 ICOS agonist non-T-cell depleting antibody, as monotherapy and combination therapy with anti-cancer agents that includes PE. A range of GSK609 dose levels (≥0.1–1 mg/kg) having biological and clinical activity were identified and evaluated in the expansion phase with GSK609 0.3 mg/kg selected as the dose for further investigation. Results from the HNSCC expansion cohorts (ECs) showed GSK609 has single agent activity in pts with relapsed/refractory disease, and early clinical activity in combination with PE in pts with anti-PD-1/L1 treatment-naïve disease (Rischin, et al. Annals of Oncol 2019;30[Supplement_5]:v454–5). Updated results from the GSK609/PE HNSCC EC are presented. Methods: Eligible pts for the HNSCC EC had anti-PD-1/L1 treatment-naïve disease, ≤5 prior lines of therapy, measurable disease, and no active autoimmune disease. Pts received GSK609 0.3 mg/kg + PE 200 mg every 3 weeks (wks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, up to 2 years (yrs)/35 cycles. Disease assessments were performed every 9 wks through wk 54 then every 12 wks thereafter. Pts were followed for survival and subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Results: As of 11 October 2019, 34 pts were enrolled and evaluable for efficacy analyses. The median age of this population was 61.5 yrs (range: 37–77); 85% were male; 53% received ≥1 prior line of therapy in the metastatic setting. ORR was 26% (95% CI: 12.9, 44.4; n = 9 with 4 complete and 5 partial responses); disease control rate was 68% (95% CI: 49.5, 82.6; n = 23). Among pts with PD-L1 IHC status by 22C3 pharmDx assay (n = 24; 71%), the majority of pts with a response or stable disease (SD) had PD-L1 CPS status < 20 (11 of 15 pts including 1 SD pt with CPS < 1). Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.9, 6,2). Median OS was not reached at time of analysis (95% CI: 8.2, NR); 6-month OS rate was 84% (95% CI: 66, 93). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 66% of pts; the majority of events were Grades 1 or 2 with < 10% of pts experiencing ≥ Grade 3 events. Conclusions: This updated analysis with a more mature dataset shows promising clinical activity that supports further randomized investigation of GSK609 in combination with PE with an OS endpoint in HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02723955 .
Influence of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), tumor size and age on patient outcomes after anlotinib treatment: A subgroup analysis based on ALTER01031 trial for medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).
Authors: Gao Ming , Chi Yihebali , Zheng Xiangqian , Li Dapeng , Tang Pingzhang , Xu Zhengang , Chen Xiaohong , Ge Minghua , Zhang Yuan , Guo Zhuming , Wang Jun , Chen Jie , Zhang Jiewu , Cheng Ying , Li Zhendong , Liu Hui , Qin Jianwu , Zhu Jingqiang , Cheng Ruochuan
Published: May 2020

6527

Background: Anlotinib is a newly developed TKI achieved a nearly 2-fold PFS prolongation in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial (NCT02586350) for MTC, the results of which were firstly published in 2019 ASCO annual meeting. This subanalysis examined the influence of baseline demographic (ECOG PS score, age) and tumor size on efficacy in this study. Methods: Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate the median PFS (mPFS) for subgroups of patients (pts) received anlotinib or placebo based on ECOG PS score (0 vs. 1), median tumor lesion diameter ( < 67 vs. ≥67mm) and age ( < 55 vs. ≥55 years old). Results: 91 eligible pts were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive anlotinib or placebo. The numbers of pts in each subgroup were summarized in the table below. In placebo arm, mPFS did not differ significantly between pts with ECOG PS 0 and 1 (11.3 vs. 11.1months; HR = 0.895 [95% CI 0.347, 2.312], P = 0.821) or between pts with tumor lesion diameter < 67mm and ≥ 67mm (7.0 vs. 11.1 months; HR = 1.168 [95% CI 0.463, 2.945], P = 0.737). Conversely, pts in anlotinib arm with ECOG PS 0 obtained more PFS benefits (34.6 vs. 14.0 months; HR = 0.331 [95% CI 0.163, 0.671], P = 0.002). Similarly, anlotinib treated pts with tumor lesion diameters < 67mm achieved a longer mPFS (Not reached vs. 14.0 months, HR = 0.567 [95% CI 0.280, 1.147], P = 0.111). Consistent with that has been verified in differentiated thyroid cancer, high age predicted poor prognosis as mPFS were 14.3 months and 6.8 months in pts < 55 and ≥ 55 years old respectively in placebo arm (HR = 0.322 [95% CI 0.116, 0.893], P = 0.007).). Anlotinib treatment exhibited PFS improvement to pts in both age groups but higher PFS prolongation was observed in pts < 55 years old (22.4 vs. 14.0 months; HR = 0.720 [95% CI 0.321, 1.614], P = 0.381). Conclusions: This analysis showed that for pts in placebo arm, PFS was similar regardless of functional status (ECOG PS) or tumor size while older pts had higher progression risk. Treatment with anlotinib exhibited greater PFS benefits for pts with better functional status (ECOG PS = 0), younger age or lower tumor burden. These results indicated that it is reasonable to start anlotinib treatment at a relative earlier disease stage before the worsen of ECOG PS, increase of tumor size or ageing. Clinical trial information: NCT02586350 . [Table: see text]
Initial analyses of a phase I/II trial of durvalumab (D) plus tremelimumab (T) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic head and neck carcinoma.
Authors: Bahig Houda , Aubin Francine , Nguyen-Tan Phuc Felix , Souliere Denis , Palma David A. , Charpentier Danielle , Debenham Brock J , Jamal Rahima , Sultanem Khalil , Ballivy Olivier , Filion Edith , Wong Philip
Published: May 2020

6531

Background: PD-1/PD-L1 +/- CTLA-4 blockade in head-and-neck carcinoma (HNSCC) has shown signs of clinical activity. SBRT aims to reduce tumor burden and perhaps be immune-stimulatory. This analysis seeks to assess the safety and efficacy signal of the triple treatment combination (TTC) consisting of SBRT sandwiched between cycles of D (αPD-L1) and T (αCTLA-4) in oligometastatic (2-10) HNSCC. Methods: This is a single arm multi-institutional phase I/II trial (NCT03283605). D (1500 mg) and T (75 mg) were given for 4 monthly cycles, followed by monthly D. SBRT to 2-5 lesions was administered during cycle 2. The median prescribed and maximum SBRT doses were 40 Gy (range:18-50) and 49 Gy (range:28-61), respectively, given in 3-5 fractions. Global health status was derived from EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaires. Results: At data cut-off (Dec 31, 2019), 20 patients were recruited, of which 16 had a study treatment and were analyzed. Table describes the patient characteristics. There were 1 CTCAE V5.0 Grade 2 and 1 Grade 3 (both GI) serious adverse event (SAE) attributable to D and T. Two patients had unrelated SAEs (1 Grade 3-hypercalcemia and 1 Grade 5-GI). The Grade 5 SAE was a gastric hemorrhage that occurred the night of the first D + T infusion. There was no Grade 3+ AE secondary to SBRT. Thus, SBRT did not add to the 2/16 patients who had D + T related SAEs. Global health status scores did not differ statistically between baseline (75) and cycle 3 (73). Of the 14 patients that received SBRT, 7 patients had RECIST target lesions untreated by SBRT. The best responses for these 7 patients were: 1 CR, 3 PR, and 3 SD. When SBRT treated lesions are included and analyzed per RECIST (n = 14), there were 9 PR, 3 SD and 2 PD. The estimated median progression free survival was 7.2 months. Conclusions: The first 16 evaluable patients demonstrated tolerable profiles to the TTC (D + T + SBRT) for the treatment of oligometastatic (≤10 lesions) HNSCC. Best response rates were encouraging and could be due to the addition of SBRT during immunotherapy that served to either stimulate the immune system or annihilate slow responding or immunotherapy resistant lesions. Smaller overall tumor burden and 7/16 patients being treated in first line could also have contributed to better results. Clinical trial information: NCT03283605 . [Table: see text]
Efficacy and tolerance of carboplatin-cetuximab in patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma unfit for extreme regimen.
Authors: Le Roy Charlotte , Vernerey Dewi , Evin Cecile , Crespel Celine , Samaille Thomas , Le Tourneau Christophe , Huguet Florence
Published: May 2020

6539

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the fourth cause of death by cancer in France. For metastatic patients, the standard first line treatment is the EXTREME regimen. However, a lot of these patients have a poor performance status (PS) and/or several comorbidities making them unfit for this regimen. We have treated them with carboplatin and cetuximab (simplified EXTREME regimen) since 2007. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of this regimen in this frail population. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of all patients treated with simplified EXTREME regimen for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC in three French academic hospitals between 2007 and 2017. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), identification of prognostic factors, and toxicity. Results: 103 patients were included with a median age of 63 y.o., 60% had a PS 0-1 and 40% a PS 2-3. With a median follow-up of 30.2 months, median OS was 7.2 months and median PFS 3.7 months. ORR was 39% and 24% of patients had disease stabilization. On univariate analysis, a PS of 2 or more was significantly associated with a worse OS (median OS 10.1 months if PS 0-1 versus 4.6 months if PS 2-3; HR = 1.68; 95%CI = 1.11-2.57; p = 0.01). Acute grade 3-4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity rates were 25.2% and 27.2%, respectively, with 11.8% of thrombopenia, 9.7% of neutropenia, 10% of skin toxicity, and 12.6% of asthenia. Patients with grade 1 or more skin toxicity had a higher ORR (HR = 3.44; 95%CI = 1.16-10.23; p = 0.03) and a prolonged OS (HR = 0.37; 95%CI = 0.23-0.58; p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR0.29; 95%CI = 0.19-0.47; p < 0.0001). During treatment, 29% of patients had a pain decrease, 13.5% a gain of weight, and 17.2% an improvement in PS. Conclusions: This is the largest cohort of patients treated with simplified EXTREME for HNSCC. Simplified EXTREME was well tolerated in this frail population with a high ORR. Patients with a good PS had prolonged survival. Interestingly, skin toxicity of any grade was significantly correlated with treatment efficacy.