Design of Pipelines in Mudslide Areas
Authors: Bea R.G. , Aurora R.P. 
Published: December 2007

A design strategy is presented for routing and configuring pipelines in mudslide areas. This strategy is illustrated with a case study of a pipeline in the Mississippi River Delta. The case study focuses on the geotechnical aspects of pipeline settlement, flotation, and analysis of mudslide forces and stresses.

Introduction

It is impossible to prevent pipeline failures in an active mudslide area. Key strategies to design pipelines that have acceptable cost and reliability in these areas includeminimum exposure to existing and potential locations of mudslides;minimum lateral soil forces;weighting to minimize penetration into the seafloor;analysis to establish soil loadings, restraints, flexibility, and ultimate strength of the pipeline; anddesign of terminals to incorporate flexibility, repairability, and control of escape of products.

Design Strategy

The primary objective of the pipeline design process is to design a system that will reliably process is to design a system that will reliably transport products during its lifetime at the lowest total cost. The pipeline design process (Fig. 1) must consider the constraints posed by environment, construction, operations, and design. These constraints are discussed next.

Constraints

Environmental constraints include definition of the waves, currents, mudslides, fault movements, soils profile, and bathymetry that can influence the pipeline during its lifetime. Construction constraints include the equipment used for fabrication and installation, pipeline steels, welding and quality controls, and pipeline bedding, backfill, and armoring. Operational constraints include desired tie-in points; volumes, pressures, temperature, and corrosivity of fluids to be transported, pipeline maintenance, pipeline repair, fluid pipeline maintenance, pipeline repair, fluid escape-control measures, and acceptable failure incidence. Design constraints include analysis methods to be used, routing guidelines, regulatory requirements and codes, allowable stresses, and factors of safety. Design constraints also include economic and impact considerations. Economic considerations include costs of construction, operation, failure, and repair. Impact considerations include potential effects of the pipeline on other operations and facilities, impacts of the pipeline on the environment, and social and political effects of failures. In view of these constraints, the pipeline designer has to gather the data and information needed to define the constraints at the outset of the engineering process. The design process then focuses on a logical balancing of these constraints to result in an optimal pipeline design. Of particular importance is the use of hazard mitigation techniques in the pipeline design process. Examples of such techniques include process. Examples of such techniques includebackflow valves to prevent escape of fluids,pumping or compression shutdown systems,breakaway couplings to control the points of failure,use of pipe coatings to minimize forces, andincorporation of failure detection and repair systems.

Perhaps the most important hazard mitigation technique is perceptive siting and routing of the pipeline to avoid or minimize exposure to present and future hazards, which are discussed next. present and future hazards, which are discussed next. Routing Reconnaissance and Hazard Identification

Perceptive routing of pipelines to avoid hazardous Perceptive routing of pipelines to avoid hazardous conditions starts with detailed surveys and geologic study of the potential routes.

JPT

p. 1985