Implementing an Activity Tracker to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Patients With Diabetes in Primary Care: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis (Preprint)
Authors: Pelletier Cynthia , Chabot Christian , Gagnon Marie-Pierre , Rhéaume Caroline 
Published: November 2022

BACKGROUND

Many projects related to technology implementation in the context of chronic diseases have been developed over the years to better manage lifestyle medicine interventions and improve patient care. However, technology implementation in primary care settings remains challenging.

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to carry out a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis (1) to assess satisfaction among patients with type 2 diabetes using an activity tracker to increase motivation for physical activity (PA) and (2) to explore the research and health care team’s perceptions of this technology’s implementation in a primary care setting.

METHODS

A 3-month hybrid type 1 study, which included 2 stages, was conducted in an academic primary health center in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. In stage 1, a total of 30 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to the intervention (activity tracker) group or the control group. In stage 2, a SWOT analysis was performed on both patients and health care professionals to determine the components of successful technology implementation. Two questionnaires were used to gather feedback: a satisfaction and acceptability questionnaire concerning an activity tracker (15 patients in the intervention group) and a questionnaire based on the SWOT elements (15 patients in the intervention group and 7 health care professionals). Both questionnaires contained quantitative and qualitative questions. Qualitative variables from open questions were synthesized in a matrix and ranked according to apparition frequency and global importance. A thematic analysis was performed by the first author and validated by 2 coauthors separately. The information gathered was triangulated to propose recommendations that were then approved by the team. Both quantitative (randomized controlled trial participants) and qualitative (randomized controlled trial participants and team) results were combined for recommendations.

RESULTS

In total, 86% (12/14) of the participants were satisfied with their activity tracker use and 75% (9/12) felt that it incited them to stick to their PA program. The main strengths of the team members’ perspectives were the project initiation and involvement of a patient partner, the study design, the team, and the device. The weaknesses were the budgetary constraints, the turnover, and the technical issues. The opportunities were the primary care setting, the loan of equipment, and common technology. The threats were recruitment issues, administrative challenges, technological difficulties, and a single research site.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type 2 diabetes were satisfied with their activity tracker used to improve motivation for PA. Health care team members agreed that implementation can be done in primary care, but some challenges remain in using this technological tool in clinical practice regularly.

CLINICALTRIAL

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03709966; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03709966