Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis
Authors: Yang Seokhun , Kang Jeehoon , Hwang Doyeon , Zhang Jinlong , Jiang Jun , Hu Xinyang , Hahn Joo-Yong , Nam Chang-Wook , Doh Joon-Hyung , Lee Bong-Ki , Kim Weon , Huang Jinyu , Jiang Fan , Zhou Hao , Chen Peng , Tang Lijiang , Jiang Wenbing , Chen Xiaomin , He Wenming , Ahn Sung Gyun , Yoon Myeong-Ho , Kim Ung , Lee Joo Myung , Ki You-Jeong , Shin Eun-Seok , Kim Hyo-Soo , Tahk Seung-Jea , Wang Jian’an , Koo Bon-Kwon 
Published: January 2024

Importance

Treatment strategies for intermediate coronary lesions guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes. Identifying low-risk deferred vessels to ensure the safe deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and high-risk revascularized vessels that necessitate thorough follow-up can help determine optimal treatment strategies.

Objectives

To investigate outcomes according to treatment types and FFR and IVUS parameters after FFR- or IVUS-guided treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included patients with intermediate coronary stenosis from the Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial, an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial that assigned patients into an IVUS-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for minimum lumen area [MLA] ≤3 mm2 or 3 mm2 to 4 mm2 with plaque burden [PB] ≥70%) or an FFR-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for FFR ≤0.80). Data were analyzed from November to December 2022.

Exposures

FFR or IVUS parameters within the deferred and revascularized vessels.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and revascularization at 2 years.

Results

A total of 1619 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9.6] years; 1137 [70.2%] male) with 1753 vessels were included in analysis. In 950 vessels for which revascularization was deferred, incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.8% vs 4.1%; P = .72). Vessels with FFR greater than 0.92 in the FFR group and MLA greater than 4.5 mm2 or PB of 58% or less in the IVUS group were identified as low-risk deferred vessels, with a decreased risk of TVF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.71]; P = .009). In 803 revascularized vessels, the incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.6% vs 3.7%; P = .95), which was similar in the revascularized vessels undergoing PCI optimization (4.2% vs 2.5%; P = .31). Vessels with post-PCI FFR of 0.80 or less in the FFR group or minimum stent area of 6.0 mm2 or less or with PB at stent edge greater than 58% in the IVUS group had an increased risk for TVF (HR, 7.20 [95% CI, 3.20-16.21]; P &amp;lt; .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis, FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies showed comparable outcomes in both deferred and revascularized vessels. Binary FFR and IVUS parameters could further define low-risk deferred vessels and high-risk revascularized vessels.