ANALISIS KELEMBAGAAN GAPOKTAN DALAM KEGIATAN LEMBAGA DISTRIBUSI PANGAN MASYARAKAT (LDPM) DI KABUPATEN GROBOGAN
Authors: Wijianto Arip , Widiyanto Widiyanto , Anantanyu Sapja 
Published: March 2018

<p><em>This research aims to explain in detail about the condition of Gapoktan institutional through activities of</em><em> </em><em>Reinforcement of Society Food’s Distributive Institution</em><em> (</em><em>Reinforcement</em><em>-LDPM) </em><em>at</em><em> </em><em>the Regency of </em><em>Grobogan </em><em>considered from </em><em>superstru</em><em>c</em><em>tur</em><em> aspect</em><em>, </em><em>community </em><em>profil</em><em>es</em><em> </em><em>of farmers the member of Gapoktan</em><em>, </em><em>and</em><em> organizational profile</em><em> aspect of the</em><em> Gapoktan. </em><em>Qualitative method and descriptive approach were used in this research</em><em>. </em><em>The sampling was </em><em>snowball sampling</em><em> technique</em><em>. </em><em>The technique of data collection used visceral interview, observation, and record-keeping. The tryout of data validity used </em><em>triangula</em><em>tion</em><em> </em><em>source</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>triangula</em><em>tion</em><em> met</em><em>hod</em><em>, </em><em>whereas</em><em> </em><em>the data analysis used three</em><em> </em><em>main components, i.e.</em><em> (1) </em><em>data reduction,</em><em> (2) data</em><em> display,</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> (3) </em><em>drawing conclusion and verification.</em><em> B</em><em>ased on the research result, it can be concluded that analysis of Gapoktan institutional considered from </em><em>superstru</em><em>c</em><em>tur</em><em>e aspects</em><em> </em><em>including government policy which influenced </em><em>Gapoktan</em><em> institutional</em><em>. </em><em>Both the federal government and local government of </em><em>Grobogan</em><em> Regency have issued some policies that support the reinforcement activities of Society Food’s Distributive Institution</em><em> (LDPM)</em><em>, but</em><em> </em><em>the government policy about Bulog standardization was considered that it was too difficult for </em><em>Gapoktan </em><em>institutional</em><em>. </em><em>Considered from community profile, the development of </em><em>Gapoktan</em><em> institutional</em><em> </em><em>has transpired well enough because of having sufficient </em><em>asset, </em><em>collective action in both of routine meeting and directive counseling</em><em>, </em><em>drawing conclusion by the chief of </em><em>Gapoktan </em><em>through discussion and coordination focus</em><em>, </em><em>whereas the relationship between </em><em>Gapoktan </em><em>institutional with the other Gapoktan has transpired well</em><em>. </em><em>Considered from its institutional profile</em><em>, </em><em>the Gapoktan still had constraints or problem. Looking to its organization system, the structure of labor units</em><em> </em><em>of the reinforcement activities of Society Food’s Distributive Institution </em><em>(LDPM) </em><em>had not been organized well</em><em>. </em><em>The members prefer to profitable jobs than the voluntary Gapoktan. Outsides, the institutional management and resource allocation had not well complied.</em></p>