Highly Sensitive Droplet Digital PCR for MYD88L265P Mutation Detection and Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
Authors: Drandi Daniela , Genuardi Elisa , Ghione Paola , Grimaldi Daniele , Mantoan Barbara , Ruggeri Marina , Barbero Daniela , Monitillo Luigia , Vasta Marika , Marzanati Eleonora , Verardo Giulia , Omedè Paola , Cavallo Federica , Boccadoro Mario , Ladetto Marco , Ferrero Simone 
Published: October 2019

Background. Recently, the somatic MYD88L265P mutation has been found as the hallmark of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM), being detectable in nearly 90% of cases, as well as in up to 50% of IgM MGUS, rarely in other non-Hodgkin lymphomas and never in multiple myeloma (MM). Beyond its potential diagnostic role, this mutation has been associated with tumor growth and therapy resistance. Moreover, MYD88L265P might represent an ideal marker for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in a disease whose therapeutic scenario has been rapidly changing, with many new available and highly effective drugs (nucleoside analogues, proteasome and BTK-inhibitors). However, the current MYD88L265P allele-specific quantitative PCR (ASqPCR) diagnostic tool lacks sensitivity (1.00E-03) and thus is not suitable for MRD. Moreover, is not useful to test peripheral blood (PB), that harbors low concentrations of circulating tumor cells (especially after immunochemotherapy), neither to assess cell-free DNA (cfDNA), usually present at very low amount in plasma. Therefore, our study aims: 1) to assess whether a highly sensitive tool as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) might be helpful in MYD88L265P screening; 2) to evaluate whether MYD88L265P might be a suitable marker for MRD monitoring in WM.

Methods. Bone marrow (BM) and PB samples were collected at diagnosis and during follow-up from a local series of patients affected by WM, IgM MGUS and IgG-secreting lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), as well as samples from healthy subjects and MM were used as negative controls. Genomic (gDNA) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were extracted as recommended (Qiagen). MYD88L265P was assessed on 100 ng of gDNA by ASqPCR as previously described [Xu 2013] and by ddPCR, using a custom dual labelled probe assay (Bio-Rad). When available, 50 ng of cfDNA were tested for MYD88L265P, only by ddPCR. ddPCR was performed on 20 µl of reaction at 55°C for 40 cycles, run on QX100 droplet reader and analyzed by QuantaSoft v1.6.6 (Bio-Rad). MYD88L265P ASqPCR level was estimated as described [Treon 2012]. ΔCT<8.4 identified a MYD88L265P positive sample. Similarly, MYD88L265P ddPCR cut-off was settled on the highest healthy samples level. IGH rearrangements identification and IGH-based MRD analysis were performed as previously described [van der Velden 2007].

Results. Once the ddPCR assay was optimized, the sensitivity of MYD88L265P ddPCR was compared to ASqPCR on a ten-fold serial dilution standard curves built with a 70% MYD88L265P mutated WM sample, previously identified by Sanger sequencing [Treon 2012]. Whereas ASqPCR confirmed the reported sensitivity of 1.00E−03, ddPCR reached a sensitivity of 5.00E−05. Thereafter, overall 105 samples (48 BM, 57 PB, 52 diagnosis and 53 follow up) from 58 patients (49 WM, 5 IgM MGUS and 4 LPL) as well as 20 controls (15 healthy subjects and 5 MM) were tested by both methods. 32/33 (97%) diagnostic BM scored positive for MYD88L265P by both ddPCR and ASqPCR (being the only one negative a WM), while ddPCR, was able to detect more mutated cases, than ASqPCR, among diagnostic PB samples: 15/19 (79%) vs 9/19 (47%) (Table1). Moreover, to investigate whether the MYD88L265P ddPCR tool could be used for MRD detection we compared it to the standardized IGH-based MRD. An IGH-based MRD marker was found in 40/53 (75%) patients (37 WM and 3 LPL). Five Patients, so far analyzed, with baseline and follow up samples (18 BM, 5 PB) showed highly superimposable results between the two methods. Finally, pivotal results on cfDNA from 10 patients showed higher median levels of MYD88L265P mutation in plasma if compared to PB.

Conclusions. We developed a new tool for diagnosis and MRD monitoring in WM, showing that: 1) ddPCR is a highly sensitive tool for MYD88L265P detection, especially useful in low infiltrated samples, like PB; 2) MYD88L265P can be effectively and easily used for MRD monitoring in WM, achieving similar results to standardized IGH-based MRD; 3) cfDNA recovered from plasma might be an attractive alternative for MYD88L265P detection, deserving further investigation. Methodological validation against IgH-based MRD detection and Flow cytometry and correlations with clinical impact are currently ongoing on external samples series. Table 1.PATIENTSWM (45)LPL (2)IgM MGUS (5)TISSUEBMPBBMPBBMPBSAMPLES31141114MYD88L265P ddPCR/ASqPCR30/3011/71/10/01/14/2

TABLE 1. MYD88L265P mutation detection in diagnostic samples: ddPCR vs ASqPCR

Disclosures

Boccadoro: Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.