Adequacy in Faculty Standards in U.S. Regional Accreditation Commissions
Authors: Nhung Pham Thi Tuyet 
Published: April 2019

This literature review addresses five themes that inform the faculty adequacy standards established by U.S. regional accreditation commissions and provides information about faculty credentials, the relationship between institutional missions and faculty responsibilities; full-time, part-time and contingent faculty; faculty responsibilities, and faculty in disciplinary-based accreditation. This review of literature supports institutions’ responses to the standards for adequacy of full-time faculty in six U.S. regional accreditation commissions. The study’s findings may provide common themes related to faculty adequacy to facilitate the institutions’ definitions and standards for faculty adequacy. The results might inform regional accreditors as they evaluate institutions on this standard. Finally, this study may be of interest to accreditors in other countries as they develop and revise their standards related to faculty adequacy.

Keywords

Faculty adequacy, accreditation standards, U.S. regional accreditation commissions

References

 [1] Middaugh, M. F. (2002). Faculty productivity: Different strategies for different audiences. Planning For Higher Education, 30(3), 34-43[2] Tincher-Ladner, L., & King, S. (2014). Effects of regional accreditation of full-time faculty on community college graduation rates. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38, 947-950.[3] Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) (2012). Accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.nwccu.org/accreditation/standards-policies/standards/[4] Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) (2015). Standards for accreditation and requirements of affiliation ( 13th ed). [5] North Central Association of Colleges and Schools-The Higher Learning Commission (NCA-HLC) (2015). Resource guide: Criteria for accreditation and assumed practices.[6] New England Association of Schools and Colleges Commission on Institutions of Higher Education (NEASC-CIHE) (2011). The standards for accreditation. [7] Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (2011). Faculty roster: Instructions for reporting the qualifications of full-time and part-time faculty. [8] WASC Senior College and University Commission (WSCUC) (2013). Handbook of Accreditation. Retrieved at https://www.wscuc.org/book/export/html/924[9] Cohen, A. & Kisker C. (2010). The shaping of American higher education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.[10] Faireweather.J. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity. The Journal of Higher Education. 73(1). 26-48[11] Townsend, B. K. (2008). Community college faculty what we know and need to know. Community College Review. 36 (1). 5-24. [12] National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Federal programs for education and related activities. In Digest of Education Statistics (Chap. 4). Retrieved from the National Center for Education Statistics Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_261.asp[13] Middaugh, M. F.(2001). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for colleges and universities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.[14] Texas Tech University (2006). Faculty responsibility (OP 32.06). Retrieved from http://www.depts.ttu.edu/opmanual/OP32.06.pdf[15] South Plains College (2015). Faculty Handbook. Retrieved from http://www.southplainscollege.edu/employees/manualshandbooks/facultyhandbook.php[16] North Central Association of Colleges and Schools-The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) (2015). Determining qualified faculty through HLC’s criteria for accreditation and assumed practices. Retrieved at https://www.lssu.edu/hlc/documents/QualifiedFacultyGuidelines_2015-08_OPB.pdf[17] Chaden, C. (2013). Engaging faculty in retention: Finding traction through accreditation. New Directions for Higher Education, (161), 91-100. doi: 10.1002/he.20049[18] Williams, T. S. (2011). The unknowning knowers: Faculty and the accreditation process. (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text (Order No. 3476398).[19] Townsend, B.K & Rosser, V.J (2007). Workload issues and measures of faculty productivities. The NEA Higher Education Journal. 7-19[20] Middaugh, M. F. (2011). Measuring faculty productivity: Let's get it right. Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(2), A43-A44.[21] Middaugh, M. F., Kelly, H. A., & Walters, A. M. (2008). The role of institutional research in understanding and describing faculty work. New Directions for Higher Education, (141), 41-56. doi:10.1002/he.292[22] Maxey, D. D., & Kezar, A. K. (2015). Revealing opportunities and obstacles for changing non-tenure-track faculty practices: An examination of stakeholders' awareness of institutional contradictions. Journal of Higher Education, 86(4), 564-594.[23] Marsh, F. K. (2010). High performance team: Building a business program with part- and full-time faculty. Journal of Education for Business, 85(4), 187-194. doi:10.1080/08832320903252421[24] Elman, S. E. (2003). A regional accreditation perspective on contingent faculty appointments. New Directions for Higher Education, (123), 71.[25] Gerlich, R. N., & Sollosy, M. (2010). Predicting assessment outcomes: The effect of full-time and part-time faculty. Journal of Case Studies in Accreditation and Assessment, 1-9[26] Speer, C. N. (2013). Perceptions of employment and use of part-time faculty among chief instructional officers at southern association of colleges and schools-accredited public associate's colleges. (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text. (Order No. 3612131)[27] Hedrick, D. D., Henson, S. E., Krieg, J. M., & Wassell Jr., C. S. (2010). The effects of AACSB accreditation on faculty salaries and productivity. Journal of Education for Business, 85(5), 284-291. doi:10.1080/08832320903449543[28] Bell, R. L., & Joyce, M. P. (2011). Comparing business faculty's salaries by rank and gender: Does AACSB accreditation really make a difference? Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(2), 19-40.[29] Koys, D. J. (2008). Judging academic qualifications, professional qualifications, and participation of faculty using AACSB guidelines. Journal of Education for Business, 83(4), 207-213.[30] Boronico, J., Murdy, J., & Kong, X. (2014). Faculty sufficiency and AACSB accreditation compliance within a global university: A mathematical modeling approach. American Journal of Business Education, 7(3), 213-218. [31] Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo (2014). Thông thư số 36/2014/TTLT-BGDĐT-BNV ngày 28/11/2014 về Quy định mã số và tiêu chuẩn chức danh nghề nghiệp viên chức giảng dạy trong các cơ sở giáo dục đại học công lập. [32] Chính Phủ (2015). Nghị định chính phủ số 73/2015/NĐ-CP ngày 08/09/2015 về Quy định tiêu chuẩn phân tầng, khung xếp hạng và tiêu chuẩn xếp hạng cơ sở giáo dục đại học. [33] Cục quản lý chất lượng (2018). Thông thư số 768/QLCL-KĐCLGD ngày 20/04/2018 về Hướng dẫn đánh giá theo bộ tiêu chuẩn đánh giá chất lượng cơ sỏ giáo dục đại học.