Abstract B13: High-risk patients found affected with breast cancer during a multimodality screening program: Triple negative versus non-triple negative breast cancers
Authors: Podo Franca , Santoro Filippo , Manoukian Siranoush , Giacomi Clelia de , Cortesi Laura , Preda Lorenzo , Corcione Stefano , Sardanelli Francesco 
Published: January 2014

Rationale and purpose: Triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs), characterized by lack of hormone receptors' expression in absence of HER2 amplification, partially overlap with the basal-like subtype, with frequent occurrence in BRCA1 mutation carriers (BRCA1+). TNBCs are often associated with earlier onset, interval cancer diagnosis, larger size and aggressive clinical course with peak risk of recurrence at 1-3 years and increased mortality rate in the first 5 years. Thus, when screening women at high risk of breast cancer, special attention should be paid to patient outcome for TNBCs in comparison with non-TNBCs.

Our aim was to compare TNBCs and non-TNBCs diagnosed during a prospective, non-randomized, multimodality screening study – including clinical breast examination (CBE), mammography, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) – on women at familial/genetic high risk of breast cancer conducted in 18 centres from June 2000 to March 2008 (ISS-HIBCRIT-1; Sardanelli F et al, Invest Radiol 2011).

Methods: Comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U, Fisher exact and χ2 tests.

Results: Among the 44 patients diagnosed with invasive cancers, 14 (31%) were TNBCs and 30 (69%) non-TNBCs, the former being 13 invasive ductal (IDC) and 1 atypical medullary carcinoma, the latter also including 15/30 lobular subtypes and/or DCIS component (p=0.005). Of the 14 TNBCs, 10 (71%) were found in BRCA1+, 2 (14%) in BRCA2+ and 2 (14%) in BRCA-untested women with strong family history of breast/ovarian cancer; the same data for 30 non-TNBCs were 9 (30%), 6 (20%) and 15 (50%) respectively (p=0.028). We had only three interval cancers, all TNBCs. The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (range 36-62) for TNBCs and 53 years (range 35-72) for non-TNBCs (p=n.s). TNBCs presented a higher rate (11/14, 79%) of pathological grade 3 IDCs compared with non-TNBCs (8/30, 27%) (p=0.002). The mean tumor size was 1.6 cm for TNBCs and 1.2 cm for non-TNBCs (p=n.s). Nodal status was negative in 12/14 (86%) TNBCs and in only 16/30 (53%) non-TNBCs (p=0.038). MRI similarly outperformed CBE, mammography and US in both TNBCs and non-TNBCs. Clinical course and survival could be monitored for 40/44 patients (91%), 13 TNBCs and 27 non-TNBCs, with a follow-up of 5.8 and 6.3 years (p=n.s) respectively. The rate of disease-free patients for over 5 years was 8/13 (62%; mean disease-free interval 7.0 years, range 5.0-8.0) for TNBCs and 17/27 (63%; mean 7.2 years, range 5.2-9.9) for non-TNBCs. Death due to BC occurred for 2/13 TNBC (15%, at 3.5 and 4.2 years) and 3/27 non-TNBC patients (11%; at 2.0, 4.9 and 5.7 years). The rate of locoregional relapse was 1/13 (8%, at 4.4 years) and 5/27 (19%; mean time of 5.0 years, range 2.4-7.0) respectively. Distant recurrence was reported for only 2 non-TNBC patients.

Conclusion: TNBCs showed stronger association with BRCA1+ status, lower rate of lobular subtypes or DCIS component, and less frequent nodal involvement. Despite a more frequent pathological grade 3 and the tendency to be diagnosed as interval cancers, under the current treatment protocols TNBCs showed relapse and BC-related death rates and over-5-year disease-free intervals similar to those of non-TNBCs. These data provide outcome evidence supporting the value of entering women at high risk of TNBC (in particular BRCA1+) in intensive screening programs including MRI.

Citation Format: Franca Podo, Filippo Santoro, Siranoush Manoukian, Clelia de Giacomi, Laura Cortesi, Lorenzo Preda, Stefano Corcione, Francesco Sardanelli. High-risk patients found affected with breast cancer during a multimodality screening program: Triple negative versus non-triple negative breast cancers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2012 Oct 16-19; Anaheim, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Prev Res 2012;5(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B13.