Ablation of porcine ligamentum flavum with Ho:YAG, q‐switched Ho:YAG, and quadrupled Nd:YAG lasers
Authors: Johnson Matt R. , Codd Patrick J. , Hill Westin M. , Boettcher Tara 
Published: September 2015

Background and Objectives

Ligamentum flavum (LF) is a tough, rubbery connective tissue providing a portion of the ligamentous stability to the spinal column, and in its hypertrophied state forms a significant compressive pathology in degenerative spinal stenosis. The interaction of lasers and this biological tissue have not been thoroughly studied. Technological advances improving endoscopic surgical access to the spinal canal makes selective removal of LF using small, flexible tools such as laser‐coupled fiber optics increasingly attractive for treatment of debilitating spinal stenosis. Testing was performed to assess the effect of Ho:YAG, Q‐switched Ho:YAG, and frequency quadrupled Nd:YAG lasers on samples of porcine LF. The objective was to evaluate the suitability of these lasers for surgical removal of LF.

Study Design/Materials and Methods

LF was resected from porcine spine within 2 hours of sacrifice and stored in saline until immediately prior to laser irradiation, which occurred within an additional 2 hours. The optical absorbance of a sample was measured over the spectral band from 190 to 2,360 nm both before and after dehydration. For the experiments using the Ho:YAG (λ = 2,080 nm, tp = 140 µs, FWHM) and Q‐Switched Ho:YAG (λ = 2,080 nm, tp = 260 ns, FWHM) lasers, energy was delivered to the LF through a laser‐fiber optic with 600 µm core and NA = 0.39. For the experiment using the frequency quadrupled Nd:YAG laser (λ = 266 nm, tp = 5 ns FWHM), rather than applying the laser energy through a laser‐fiber, the energy was focused through an aperture and lens directly onto the LF. Five experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of the given lasers on LF. First, using the Ho:YAG laser, the single‐pulse laser‐hole depth versus laser fluence was measured with the laser‐fiber in direct contact with the LF (1 g force) and with a standoff distance of 1 mm between the laser‐fiber face and the LF. Second, with the LF remaining in situ and the spine bisected along the coronal plane, the surface temperature of the LF was measured with an IR camera during irradiation with the Ho:YAG laser, with and without constant saline flush. Third, the mass loss was measured over the course of 450 Ho:YAG pulses. Fourth, hole depth and temperature were measured over 30 pulses of fixed fluence from the Ho:YAG and Q‐Switched Ho:YAG lasers. Fifth, the ablation rate and surface temperature were measured as a function of fluence from the Nd:YAG laser. Several LF staining and hole‐depth measurement techniques were also explored.

Results

Aside from the expected absorbance peaks corresponding to the water in the LF, the most significant peaks in absorbance were located in the spectral band from 190 to 290 nm and persisted after the tissue was dehydrated. In the first experiment, using the Ho:YAG laser and with the laser‐fiber in direct contact with the LF, the lowest single‐pulse fluence for which LF was visibly removed was 35 J/cm2. Testing was conducted at 6 fluences between 35 and 354 J/cm2. Over this range the single‐pulse hole depth was shown to be near linear (R2 = 0.9374, M = 1.6), ranging from 40 to 639 µm (N = 3). For the case where the laser‐fiber face was displaced 1 mm from the LF surface, the lowest single‐pulse fluence for which tissue was visibly removed was 72 J/cm2. Testing was conducted at 4 energy densities between 72 and 180 J/cm2. Over this range the single‐pulse hole depth was shown to be near linear (R2 = 0.8951, M = 1.4), ranging from 31 to 220 µm (N = 3). In the second experiment, with LF in situ, constant flushing with room temperature saline was shown to drastically reduce surface temperature during exposure to Ho:YAG at 5 Hz with the laser‐fiber in direct contact with the LF. Without saline, over 1 minute of treatment with a per‐pulse fluence of 141 mJ/cm2, the average maximum surface temperature measured 110°C. With 10 cc's of saline flushed over 1 minute and a per‐pulse laser fluence of 212 mJ/cm2, the average maximum surface temperature was 35°C. In the third experiment, mass loss was shown to be linear over 450 pulses of 600 mJ from the Ho:YAG laser (212 J/cm2, direct contact, N = 4; 108 J/cm2, 1 mm standoff, N = 4). With the laser‐fiber in direct contact, an average of 53 mg was removed (R2 = 0.996, M = 0.117) and with 1 mm laser‐fiber standoff, an average of 44 mg was removed (R2 = 0.9988, M = 0.097). In the fourth experiment, 30 pulses of the Ho:YAG and Q‐Switched Ho:YAG lasers at 1 mm standoff, and 5 Hz produced similar hole depths for the tested fluences of 9 J/cm2 (151 and 154 µm, respectively) and 18 J/cm2 (470 and 442 µm, respectively), though the Ho:YAG laser produced significantly more carbonization around the rim of the laser‐hole. The increased carbonization was corroborated by higher measured LF temperature. In all tests with the Ho:YAG and Q‐Switched Ho:YAG, an audible photo‐acoustic affect coincided with the laser pulse. In the fifth experiment, with the frequency quadrupled Nd:YAG laser at 15 Hz for 450 pulses, ablation depth per pulse was shown to be linear for the fluence range of 0.18 – 0.73 J/cm2 (R2 = 0.989, M = 2.4). There was no noticeable photo‐acoustic effect nor charring around the rim of the laser‐hole.

Conclusion

The Ho:YAG, Q‐Switched Ho:YAG, and frequency quadrupled Nd:YAG lasers were shown to remove ligamentum flavum (LF). A single pulse of the Ho:YAG laser was shown to cause tearing of the tissue and a large zone of necrosis surrounding the laser‐hole. Multiple pulses of the Ho:YAG and Q‐Switched Ho:YAG lasers caused charring around the rim of the laser‐hole, though the extent of charring was more extensive with the Ho:YAG laser. Charring caused by the Ho:YAG laser was shown to be mitigated by continuously flushing the affected LF with saline during irradiation. The Nd:YAG laser was shown to ablate LF with no gross visible indication of thermal damage to surrounding LF. Lasers Surg. Med. 47:839–851, 2015. © 2015 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.