B-314 Utility of he4 in differential diagnosis of pleural effusions
Authors: Bérgamo-Vázquez S , González García L , Rives Jimenez J , González Fernández C , Trapé Pujol J 
Published: October 2024

Background

The usefulness of tumor markers in the differential diagnosis of cancer in patients with pleural effusions (PE) remains controversial. Few studies have reported the measurement of human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) in pleural fluid. HE4 is a tumor marker associated with different types of cancer. An elevated serum concentration has been observed in ovarian and lung cancers. Other benign pathologies can increase HE4 levels, which can be detect with different laboratory tests identified with adenosine deaminase (ADA), C-reactive protein (CRP), % polynuclear cell count (%PMN) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can be used in order to detect possible false positives. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic usefulness of HE4 in malignant pleural effusions by comparing HE4 concentrations between benign and malignant samples, while considering the causes of HE4 false positives.

Methods

HE4, ADA, differential leukocyte count, CRP and GFR concentrations were determined in 238 pleural effusion samples. Diagnostic efficacy analysis using receiver operating curves (ROC) identified the ability of HE4 to detect malignancy, searching for cut-off points with 100% specificity.

Results

HE4 concentrations showed significant differences (P&lt;0.01) between malignant (median 1065pmol/L) and benign (median 699pmol/L) pleural effusions. Significant differences (P&lt;0.01) were found in HE4 concentrations for gynecological and lung cancer origin (median 7397 pmol/L and 5150 pmol/L respectively) and other malignant pleural effusions (median 1065 pmol/L). Patients with benign diseases with renal failure showed a higher HE4 concentration (median 964pmol/L) than in patients without these pathologies (median 696pmol/L) identified with GFR&lt;30 mL/min. No differences were demonstrated in HE4 concentration levels using ADA, differential leukocyte count or CRP, so only glomerular filtration rate was considered cause of false positives. A sensitivity of 23% was obtained for HE4, with a cut-off point of 3050pmol/L and a specificity of 100% for the whole group. In the potential false positive group, the sensitivity of HE4 was 28% with a cutoff point of 3050 pmol/L with a specificity of 100%. In the group without potential false positives, we obtained a sensitivity of 30% with a specificity of 100% for a cutoff point of 1992pmol/L. When we used a specific cut-off point for each group, we obtained a sensitivity of 38% with a specificity of 100%.

Conclusions

HE4 levels are higher in malignant pleural effusions compared to other pathologies. HE4 levels allow the identification of malignant pleural effusions with moderate sensitivity and maximum specificity. HE4 levels can differentiate between tumors of gynecological or lung origin and others. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR&lt;30 mL/min) was considered the main cause of false positives. If we identify possible false positives, we can use specific cut-offs and improve sensitivity up to 38% with maximum specificity compared to using a single cut-off for all effusions.