What Patient-related Factors are Associated with an Increased Risk of Surgery in Patients with Stenosing Tenosynovitis? A Prospective Study
Authors: Sobel Andrew D. , Eltorai Adam E.M. , Weiss Barrett , Mansuripur P. Kaveh , Weiss Arnold-Peter C. 
Published: July 2019

Background

Numerous patient-related risk factors have been identified as contributors to patient progression to operative treatment of stenosing tenosynovitis (STS). Identifying patients most at risk of undergoing surgery after receiving a corticosteroid injection would enable health care providers to identify patients most likely to benefit from nonsurgical treatment.

Questions/purposes

(1) What proportion of prospectively enrolled patients with a new diagnosis of STS did not require further intervention after a first, second, or third injection when offered up to three corticosteroid injections? (2) Which identifiable risk factors present at the initial evaluation in patients with STS are associated with the patient opting for surgical release after a trial of one, two, or three corticosteroid injections?

Methods

One hundred ninety-six patients with a presumed diagnosis of STS were evaluated between March 2014 and June 2015, and 160 patients with 186 affected fingers were prospectively enrolled after a new diagnosis of STS was made during the study period. STS was diagnosed by assessing for tenderness at the A1 pulley, passive or active triggering, and the absence of other confounding diagnoses. Only the affected finger received a corticosteroid injection, and these patients were followed up during the study period. Patients were followed for 2 years, and 135 of the 160 patients (84%) completed the final followup. Patients with recurrent symptoms were treated with up to three corticosteroid injections before undergoing A1 pulley release, although patients could elect to undergo surgery at any time. Bivariate comparisons and a multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for independent fingers (one per participant) to identify independent variables associated with progression to surgery after injection. The time between treatments (between injection and subsequent injection or between injection and surgery) for those with recurrent symptoms was also calculated. Information collected from the last time the patient could be contacted was carried forward in the analysis for all 160 patients.

Results

No further treatment was sought after the first, second, and third injections by 81 of 160 (51%), 16 of 45 (37%), and three of 10 patients (30%), respectively; 100 of 160 patients (63%) did not pursue further intervention. After the first, second, and third injections, 36 of 160 patients (23%), 17 of 43 patients (40%), and seven of 10 of patients, respectively, did not respond to treatment. After controlling for 21 potentially confounding patient- and disease-related variables, we found that only two risk factors at the initial presentation were protective against eventual progression to surgery: osteoarthritis in the fingers (odds ratio [OR], 0.26 [95% CI, 0.085-0.786]; p = 0.017) and a longer duration of symptoms (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.38-0.89]; p = 0.012). There was no association between progression to surgery and hand dominance, finger type (thumb or other), whether the patient had diabetes, or whether the affected finger was one of multiple affected fingers. Patients who presented again for intervention (injection or surgery) did so at a mean of 153 ± 94 days.

Conclusions

Although patients should be counseled that their risk of progressing to surgery after an initial corticosteroid injection is lower than for subsequently administered injections for recurrent symptoms, nonoperative treatment should not be bypassed for patients with any of the studied risk factors.

Level of Evidence

Level II, therapeutic study.