3.Y.2. Road traffic injuries, disability burden and implications for compensation schemes in Europe
Authors:   Organised by: EUPHA-INJ, -SSWH, -ECO, EuroSafe/IDB network,   Chair persons: Maria Papadakaki (EUPHA-INJ), João Vasco Santos (EUPHA-ECO)
Published: October 2024

Reducing traffic fatalities and injuries is a complex challenge, but it is one that is of paramount importance for public health and safety worldwide. In recent years, there have been improvements in trauma care and injury prevention efforts, which reduced mortality rates and increased survival after serious injury. However, an increased heterogeneity in recovery times is observed with survivors of road traffic injuries differing in their adjustment compared to other traumas in terms of symptoms’ onset, variability and chronicity. The recovery trajectory seems to vary widely with a large percentage of survivors in need of extensive time periods for full recovery. Attention has now been shifted towards the adverse effects of non-fatal injuries on functional, mental health, economic and societal outcomes. The capacity of a person to continue functioning, inability to work, sickness absence and reliance on welfare benefits to compensate for loss of income are some of the injury-related long-term consequences, causing great concern for health and social security systems across Europe, as they have been shown to account for more than one third of total road traffic incident costs. These figures fail to include individuals who sustain “minor” injuries, which do not require hospitalisation, yet still impair their ability to work. Despite the rapidly growing epidemiological and clinical attention, there are still several issues missing from research, policy and practice. A universal definition of recovery after a road traffic injury is still missing, and this has been seen as critical for improved understanding of risk factors of poor recovery as well as improved identification of those in need of welfare benefits. Furthermore, long-term sickness absence and disability following road traffic injury in Europe is still understudied and evidence on the different return to work pathways and compensation schemes is scarce. Evidence is still limited on the context in which return to work occurs, the injury profiles most dependent on long term compensation schemes and the policy settings of injury compensation schemes that impact return to work outcomes post injury. Data availability and data linkage issues often cause misclassification errors when granting disability pensions and this remains unattended long after an injury. Welfare benefits are often poorly connected with the injury or other medical diagnoses and this makes it difficult to assess the contribution of injuries on disability pensions and other welfare benefits, especially in comorbid and multimorbid conditions. The current workshop aims to improve our understanding of the long-term consequences and the challenges faced by those injured in road traffic injuries and aid the development of interventions that seek to enable sustained recovery, and help inform policy and practice of healthcare and injury compensation systems.

Key messages

• Timely access to quality healthcare, rehabilitation therapies, and assistive technologies can significantly improve outcomes and reduce the strain on social security and compensation systems.

• Ensuring equitable access to social security benefits for injured individuals, requires efficient compensation schemes that recognize the full impact of the disability on individuals’ life.