ANALISIS PENGARUH FAKTOR-FAKTOR MOTIVASI TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS TENAGA KERJA EDUKATIF DI LINGKUNGAN KOPERTIS WILAYAH VII
Authors: Sri Murni Siti 
Published: February 2017

This research is intended to analyze the impact of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on the productivity of the manpower of permanent educational, specially of the Kopertis Wilayah VII Universities in Kotamadya Surabaya. Thefree variables of this research are extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, consisting of: (1). Income and incentive (X1); (2). Working condition (Xi); (3). Policy and administrati-on of the institution (X3); (4). Personal relationship (X4); (5). Supervision Quality (X5); (6). Achievement (Xf); (7). Accreditation 1 recognition (X7); (8). The work itself (XB); (9). Responsibilities (X9) and (J 0). Potential of individual improvement (X10}. Whereas non-free variables are productivity of the manpower of permanent educational (Y).This research use Analysis  of the Multiple Regression Linear,  and the test result of the first  hypothesis used simultaneously test (F-test) to permanent  educational rank Ill a, b, c and d, while the test of the second hypothesis implementing partial  test (t-test). The test results of the first and the second would be used as a base for the institution's decision making to reach the organizational success.  The respondents are male and female dosen Dpk. in the Teaching Staff of Nature science and Social science with total number of 80 lectures from   7 universities.   The  test  result  of  the  analysis  of  simultaneously  first hypothesis  (F-test) which assume that .free  variable motivation of extrinsic and intrinsic impact on non-free variable of productivity  of manpower of permanent  educational. Can be stated as followed:  F'o = 1,620 less than Ft = 1,90 with probabilities  = l 1,9 more than  level  of significant  (los.) 5%.  From  this result,  the  truth can 't be proved,  so extrinsic  and  intrinsic  motivation  of permanent   educational  do  not  affect  manpower productivity. With the result of R2 (R square)= 19, 01% it can mean variable motivation us model can  affect  the  manpower productivity  of permanent  educational  staff, only 19, 01% more and less 81% affected by variables cut of the model.The result of the I-test of the second hypothesis assumes that variable of the job itself (XB) is dominant ,  but  the result  of the analysis  of income  and  incentive  (X1)   is dominant; evidently  the  test  result  oft observation  = -  2,636  less  than  t  table -  -  1,986  and probability = 1, 04% less than its level of significant (los.) = 5%; with  test result  of partial coefficient determination (r2) = 9, 15% is the biggest to give contribution to the predictions of manpower permanent educational Kopertis Wilayah Vil in Surabaya , with regression coefficient (b1)  with negative sign running at -2,623.Considering the test result of the first  and second hypothesis whose is not consistent with the (expectation) assumption, so the institution where permanent educational work can take s teps by evaluating what obstacles to the improvement, then deciding the goal to success for permanent  educational and the institution.