Impact of ultra-high-resolution on cardiac CT assessment of coronary artery stenoses, plaque burden/composition, and pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation
Authors: Romanelli Scarpa Matuck B , Latina J , Shabani M , Hoballah M , Mattheson M B , Ostovaneh A , Abdollahi A , Ebrahimihoor E , Trost J C , Mahesh M , Lima J A C , Arbab-Zadeh A 
Published: October 2024

Background

Conventional coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) overestimates stenoses within stents and calcified arteries due to "blooming" artifacts. Ultra-high-resolution coronary CT (UHR-CT) may overcome this limitation because of higher spatial resolution.

Purpose

To investigate differences in coronary arterial lumen volume, stenosis severity, and plaque composition, between CCTA and UHRCT in patients with stents and/or high coronary calcium scores.

Methods

As part of a prospective pilot study, 14 patients referred for invasive coronary angiography for evaluation of obstructive CAD underwent UHRCT (Canon Precision, 160 x 0.25mm slices) prior to catheterization. Images of identical cardiac phases were reconstructed in two badges for comparison: 1) Ultra-high resolution using a 1,024 x 1,024 matrix, 0.25 mm, and 2) conventional resolution with a 524 x 524 matrix, 0.5 mm. All images were reconstructed using iterative reconstruction algorithm (AIDR 3D) and a sharp kernel (FC05).

For the left main and three coronary arteries, an automated contour analysis using a dedicated software (QAngioCT RE 3.2, Medis, Netherlands) was performed to compare conventional CCTA vs. UHR-CT resolution images across common vascular and plaque metrics, including lumen and vessel volume, plaque burden/volume, plaque composition based upon predefined fixed intensity cut-off values of CT attenuation, minimal and maximal plaque thickness, pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation (PCAT), minimal lumen area and diameter, and diameter stenosis. All lumen and vessel contours were generated by the software, without manual editing. The segment model proposed by the SCCT was used as reference and the lesions classified as greater than 25% stenosis by visual assessment were recorded. The quality of the images was subjectively assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Vessel segments with scores 1 (severe artifacts) and 2 (pronounced artifacts) were not included in the analysis.

Results

The mean patient age was 68.5 years (±6.8), 2 were female (14.3%), 6 patients had stents (11 stented segments) and the mean Agatston score was 947.6 (±449) among the 8 non-stented patients. A total of 56 vessels, 133 segments, and 57 lesions were analyzed. Eight segments (6%) were excluded from the analysis due to poor quality.

Results on a per segment and per lesion basis were summarized in the table. The mean PCAT value was significantly lower for the UHRCT images compared to NR reconstruction in both segment (p&lt;0.001) and lesion based (p=0.002) analyses. Plaque differentiation varied by UHRCT resulted in a lower fibrous plaque volumes but higher necrotic (low attenuation) plaque volumes.

Conclusions

Ultra-high-resolution CT image analysis results in significantly different coronary artery plaque volume and PCAT assessment vs. conventional resolution CCTA. These findings have implications for evaluating high-risk plaque features and perivascular inflammation in patients.Table 1