Impact of Co-Morbidities on Outcome in a Predominantly Hispanic Population of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients
Authors: Janania Martinez Michelle , Garza Juan F , Snedden Tyler W , Surapaneni Prathibha , Ananth Snegha , Rawlings Jeremy , Gregorio David J , Kakarla Sushanth , Liu Qianqian , Michalek Joel E , Diaz Adolfo Enrique 
Published: November 2019

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that co-morbidities at diagnosis can influence treatment decisions and outcomes in lymphoma patients. Considering the bimodal presentation of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) and that the majority of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients are over 65 years of age, it can be especially challenging to manage them as older patients have a higher number of co-morbidities. Studies have shown that comorbidity is associated with an inferior outcome and a lower likelihood of receiving treatment with curative intent. It must also be noted that older adults with significant co-morbidities are often excluded from clinical trials due to co-morbidities and that Hispanics (HI) have been historically underrepresented. There is a need to take a closer look at this precise patient population. The main objective of our study was to determine the common co-morbidities and their impact on outcome in a prevalently Hispanic population with both HL and NHL at the only NCI designated Cancer Center of South Texas. To our knowledge this is the largest cohort of HL patients from a single academic institution that serves primarily Hispanics.

METHODS

We located and retrospectively analyzed a total of 616 patients with diagnosis of Lymphoma (HL and NHL) by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and identified 477 patients who met criteria for inclusion; the patients all received care at UT Health San Antonio, between 2008-2018. Key variables for each patient included age, gender, race/ ethnicity, comorbidities, and vitality status in 2018. Continuously distributed outcomes were summarized with the mean and standard deviation and categorical outcomes were summarized with frequencies and percentages. The significance of variation in the mean with disease category was assessed with one way ANOVA and the significance of associations between categorical outcomes was assessed with Pearson's Chi Square or Fisher's Exact test as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model binary outcomes in terms of covariates and indicators of disease. All statistical testing was two-sided with a significance level of 5%. R1 was used throughout.

The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board. The findings will be available to patients, funders and medical community through traditional publishing and social media.

RESULTS

We identified 477 patients with HL and NHL, 262 were Hispanic (HI) [55%], 205 non-Hispanic (NH) [43%], 10 not specified [2%]; there were 232 females (49%) and 245 males (51%). Co-morbidities that were identified and analyzed were: Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Hypertension (HTN), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). The most common co-morbidity across all lymphoma subtypes was HTN. More than or equal to 50% of patients with Burkitt's, CTCL, Hodgkin's, Plasmablastic lymphoma, T cell lymphoma had no co-morbidities.

In order to determine outcome, we took into consideration vitality status at the end of 2018. When comparing HI vs NH and adjusting for individual co-morbidities (HTN, DM, CAD, CHF, CKD) there is a trend towards a higher risk of poor outcome in NH patients when compared to HI (OR 1.17, CI 0.51-2.69, p-value= 0.7176). When we looked at patients who had both CAD and CHF and adjusted for other co-morbidities the trend remained with a higher risk for poor outcome in NH (OR 1.29, CI 0.57-2.91, p-value=0.53456). Looking at patients with a combination of CAD, CHF, CKD and DM (adjusting for other individual co-morbidities) there was also a trend towards poor outcome in NH (OR 1.26, CI 0.57-2.78, p-value= 0.569316). Overall, patients with CKD had an increased risk of poor outcome (OR 15.13, CI 1.5-153.13, p-value=0.0214) as well as patients with four co-morbidities including CAD, CHF, CKD and DM2 (OR 4.89, CI 1.68-14.23, p-value=0.003597). The absence of co-morbidities shows a trend towards a better outcome (OR 0.77, CI 0.19-3.17, p-value=0.721).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of sample size, our study demonstrates that in the prevalently Hispanic population of our institution, the presence of both CKD on its own as well as CKD with multiple co-morbidities (CKD, CAD, CHF, DM2) increases the risk of poor outcome. There is a trend towards a higher risk of poor outcome in the NH population with co-morbidities when compared to HI but further studies are needed.

Disclosures

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.