A Comprehensive COVID-19 Daily News and Medical Literature Briefing to Inform Health Care and Policy in New Mexico: Implementation Study
Authors: Jarratt LynnMarie , Situ Jenny , King Rachel D , Montanez Ramos Estefania , Groves Hannah , Ormesher Ryen , Cossé Melissa , Raboff Alyse , Mahajan Avanika , Thompson Jennifer , Ko Randy F , Paltrow-Krulwich Samantha , Price Allison , Hurwitz Ariel May-Ling , CampBell Timothy , Epler Lauren T , Nguyen Fiona , Wolinsky Emma , Edwards-Fligner Morgan , Lobo Jolene , Rivera Danielle , Langsjoen Jens , Sloane Lori , Hendrix Ingrid , Munde Elly O , Onyango Clinton O , Olewe Perez K , Anyona Samuel B , Yingling Alexandra V , Lauve Nicolas R , Kumar Praveen , Stoicu Shawn , Nestsiarovich Anastasiya , Bologa Cristian G , Oprea Tudor I , Tollestrup Kristine , Myers Orrin B , Anixter Mari , Perkins Douglas J , Lambert Christophe Gerard 
Published: February 2022

Background

On March 11, 2020, the New Mexico Governor declared a public health emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The New Mexico medical advisory team contacted University of New Mexico (UNM) faculty to form a team to consolidate growing information on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its disease to facilitate New Mexico’s pandemic management. Thus, faculty, physicians, staff, graduate students, and medical students created the “UNM Global Health COVID-19 Intelligence Briefing.”

Objective

In this paper, we sought to (1) share how to create an informative briefing to guide public policy and medical practice and manage information overload with rapidly evolving scientific evidence; (2) determine the qualitative usefulness of the briefing to its readers; and (3) determine the qualitative effect this project has had on virtual medical education.

Methods

Microsoft Teams was used for manual and automated capture of COVID-19 articles and composition of briefings. Multilevel triaging saved impactful articles to be reviewed, and priority was placed on randomized controlled studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, practice guidelines, and information on health care and policy response to COVID-19. The finalized briefing was disseminated by email, a listserv, and posted on the UNM digital repository. A survey was sent to readers to determine briefing usefulness and whether it led to policy or medical practice changes. Medical students, unable to partake in direct patient care, proposed to the School of Medicine that involvement in the briefing should count as course credit, which was approved. The maintenance of medical student involvement in the briefings as well as this publication was led by medical students.

Results

An average of 456 articles were assessed daily. The briefings reached approximately 1000 people by email and listserv directly, with an unknown amount of forwarding. Digital repository tracking showed 5047 downloads across 116 countries as of July 5, 2020. The survey found 108 (95%) of 114 participants gained relevant knowledge, 90 (79%) believed it decreased misinformation, 27 (24%) used the briefing as their primary source of information, and 90 (79%) forwarded it to colleagues. Specific and impactful public policy decisions were informed based on the briefing. Medical students reported that the project allowed them to improve on their scientific literature assessment, stay current on the pandemic, and serve their community.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 briefings succeeded in informing and guiding New Mexico policy and clinical practice. The project received positive feedback from the community and was shown to decrease information burden and misinformation. The virtual platforms allowed for the continuation of medical education. Variability in subject matter expertise was addressed with training, standardized article selection criteria, and collaborative editing led by faculty.