Spread of local anaesthetic solution in epidural space visualisation with ultrasound in single shot caudals
Authors: Raghavan K. , Arnold R. 
Published: May 2007

Background:  Ultrasonography is becoming an important adjunct in paediatric neuraxial blockade. Ultrasound guidance helps in visualisation of relevant neuraxial structures, predicting depth of epidural space from skin, reduction in bony contact and faster epidural placement. The visibility of neuraxial structures declines in patients as age increases. To date, there are no studies looking at the extent of spread of local anaesthetic solution in the epidural space and its correlation to the volume used, under ultrasound guidance. We report the results of our audit on spread of local anaesthetic solution in the epidural space in single shot caudal blocks. This abstract is based on the first 17 patients, the presentation will be based on all 50 patients.

Methods:  This audit was approved by the local audit committee. We aimed to follow the extent of the spread of local anaesthetic within the epidural space with real time ultrasonography. Patients were selected when the planned anaesthetic included a single shot caudal block. The anaesthetists performing the anaesthetic and the caudal block consented to our ultrasound visualisation. All patients were below 5 years of age. No attempt was made to standardise the technique, the dose, or the speed of injection. After the placement of the caudal cannula by the primary anaesthetist involved in patient care, a separate anaesthetist, experienced in using ultrasound, visualised the neuraxial structures and subsequent spread of the local anaesthetic solution with real time ultrasound. The spread was followed during the injection and for 10 s after the completion of the injection. A 5 cm 7.5–12 MHz linear array was used longitudinally with either midline or paramedian approach.

Results:  We are reporting the preliminary results from 17 patients. Patients were aged between 1 day and 1 year 10 months. They weighed between 3.3 kg and 14.6 kg. Either 22 gauge Jelco or Abbocath were used to perform the procedure; 0.25% or 0.20% L‐bupivacaine was used on all occasions. The volume administered per kg ranged between 0.33 and 1.27 ml. The visibility of neuraxial structures was good on all occasions. On calculating the Spearmans correlation coefficient, the extent of spread of local anaesthetic in the epidural space was positively correlated with the volume used by a correlation coefficient of 0.64, with a P value of 0.008. The postoperative pain score in recovery was 0 in 16 out of the 17 cases. The one failure occurred when the observed spread would not have been expected to provide analgesia for the performed operation.

Conclusions:  Among children below 5 years of age, there seems to be a positive correlation between the volume of local anaesthetic injected into the epidural space and the extent of its spread. This needs to be further investigated by a prospective randomised control trial.

The utility of real time ultrasound to allow a reliable achievement of a desired level of sensory block, should be investigated i.e, whether the volume used in achieving a desired level of local anaesthetic spread, as guided by ultrasound, provides superior analgesia and fewer adverse effects compared with the volume calculated using the Armitage regimen.

References  1 Rapp HJ, Folger A, Grau T. Ultrasound guided epidural catheter insertion in children. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 333–339.

2 Willschke H, Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, et al. Epidural catheter placement in children: comparing a novel approach using ultrasound guidance and a standard loss of resistance technique. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 200–207.

3 Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, Sitzwohl C et al. Pilot study of neuraxial imaging by ultrasound in infants and children. Pediatr Anesth 2005; 15: 671–676.