Abstract PO4-23-09: Dual inhibition of FGFR4 and HER2/EGFR with Lapatinib improves targeting of Erk and Akt signaling in HER2+ breast cancer cells
Authors: Beardsley Jordan , Goode Joseph , Altomare Deborah 
Published: May 2024

In HER2-enriched (HER2E) breast cancer (BC), the dual HER2/EGFR inhibitor Lapatinib is a standard of care for advanced staged disease. Anti-HER2 therapies disrupt tumor progression through inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway. Some treated tumors will override inhibition by shifting to MAPK/ERK signaling to fuel cell growth, thus fostering resistance to anti-HER2 therapy. The tyrosine receptor kinase FGFR4 is included in the profile for a HER2E subtype. FGFR4 is overexpressed in ~30% of BC and can signal through PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK. Inhibitors for FGFR4 such as BLU554 are being investigated in phase I/II clinical trials for hepatocellular carcinoma, showing success in tumors that are positive for FGFR4’s preferred ligand FGF19. According to cBioPortal patient data, FGF19 is amplified in ~20% of BC, and has been shown to trigger an autocrine loop in triple negative BC through FGFR4. We examined BLU554 as a dual therapeutic with Lapatinib and dissected intracellular signaling stemming from the combination in HER2E BC. MDA-MB-453 BC cells (HER2+FGFR4+) were used for a dual strategy with BLU554 and Lapatinib. Cell viability assays were performed at matched doses, then as a dose response matrix, ranging from 0.1-20 µM. Findings were used for synergy analysis using synergyfinder.fimm.fi. Western blots determined protein activity in response to treatments. Ridaforolimus (mTOR inhibitor) was used in combination with either BLU554 or Lapatinib to assess MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathway crosstalk in MB-453 cells. Additionally, FGF19 was added to cells after a 2-hour pre-treatment to challenge BLU554 + Lapatinib and compare changes in signaling with FGF19 present. MB-453 cells treated with BLU554 decreased cell viability similarly to Lapatinib at 10 µM (65% [SD ± 3.3] and 63% [SD ± 2.1], respectively). Dual treatment decreased viability compared to single agents at all concentrations but the greatest difference was observed at 20 µM (38.5% in dual compared to Lapatinib [p-value = 0.00006]; 45.1% in dual compared to BLU554 [p-value = 0.00016]). Dose-response matrix of dual treatment yielded a ZIP synergy score of 16.852 ± 2.97 (&gt;10 is synergistic), with the greatest synergy and inhibition at 10 µM and 20 µM of both drugs. BLU554 caused a therapeutic potency shift of Lapatinib, such that lower doses of Lapatinib (0.1 µM, 1 µM) are effective at higher doses of BLU554 (10 µM, 20 µM). Westerns of MB-453 with one dose of BLU554 increased phospho-ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) at 16- or 48-hr time points versus control, but when BLU554 was re-dosed then pERK1/2 was successfully inhibited. Both pAKT and pS6RP were increased by re-dosing BLU554. Cells treated for 2 hrs with Lapatinib decreased pAKT and pS6RP and did not change pERK, whereas a 2-hr treatment of BLU554 increased pAKT and decreased pERK. Dual treatment exhibited inhibition of ERK, AKT, 4EBP1, and S6RP phosphorylation all to a greater extent than single agents in combination with Ridaforolimus. Challenge by ectopic FGF19 of BLU554 + Lapatinib was unable to restore downstream signaling of AKT and ERK. BLU554 synergistically interacts with Lapatinib to decrease cell viability while increasing its therapeutic potency. Lapatinib primarily inhibits AKT signaling, whereas BLU554 targets ERK. Dual treatment simultaneously blocks MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling and yields decreases of mTOR downstream effectors pS6RP and p4EBP1. These effects are maintained even when challenged with FGF19, suggesting that dual inhibition of FGFR4 and HER2 could prevent pathway activation from external stimuli.

Citation Format: Jordan Beardsley, Joseph Goode, Deborah Altomare. Dual inhibition of FGFR4 and HER2/EGFR with Lapatinib improves targeting of Erk and Akt signaling in HER2+ breast cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-23-09.