19 Oral Versus Written Trail Making Test Scores in Patients with Movement Disorders
Authors: Fox-Fuller Joshua T , Vickers Kayci L , Saurman Jessica L , Wechsler Rachel , Eakin Amanda , Goldstein Felicia C 
Published: December 2023

Objective:

During the COVID-19 pandemic the Oral Trail Making Test (O-TMT) was frequently used as a telehealth-compatible substitute for the written version of the Trail Making Test (W-TMT). There is significant debate among neuropsychologists about the degree to which the O-TMT measures the same cognitive abilities as the W-TMT (i.e., processing speed for part A and set-shifting for part B). Given the continued use of the O-TMT - especially for patients with fine-motor or visual impairments -we examined how O-TMT and W-TMT scores were correlated in patients with movement disorders.

Participants and Methods:

Between April 2021 and July 2022 thirty individuals with movement disorders (n=27 idiopathic Parkinson’s disease [PD]; n=1 drug-induced PD; n=1 progressive supranuclear palsy [PSP]; n=1 possible PSP) completed in-person neuropsychological evaluations at the Emory Brain Health Center in Atlanta, GA. The patients were on average 71.3 years old (SD=7.5 years), had 16 years of education (SD=2.8 years), and the majority were non-Hispanic White (n=27 White; n=3 African American) and male (n=17). In addition to other neuropsychological measures, these patients completed both the O-TMT and the W-TMT. O-TMT and W-TMT administration was counterbalanced across patients and took place thirty-minutes apart. Raw scores (i.e., time in seconds) to complete O-TMT and W-TMT part A and part B, as well as discrepancy scores (part B - part A), were used for statistical analysis; a raw score of 300 seconds was assigned when a participant could not complete that section of the O-TMT or W-TMT. Given the non-normal distribution of the data, Spearman correlations were performed between O-TMT and W-TMT scores.

Results:

Ten patients were unable to perform W-TMT part B. Of these, seven patients could also not perform O-TMT part B. Part A scores on O-TMT and W-TMT were not significantly correlated (rs = 0.27, p = .15). In contrast, part B scores were strongly correlated, such that slower performances on O-TMT part B corresponded with slower performances on W-TMT part B (rs = 0.82, p < .001). Discrepancy scores for the O-TMT and W-TMT were also significantly correlated, such that larger part A and part B discrepancy scores on O-TMT corresponded with larger discrepancy scores on W-TMT (rs = 0.78, p <.001). The pattern of results was replicated when examining these correlations only in patients who could complete all parts of O-TMT and W-TMT (n=19); part A scores of the O-TMT and W-TMT were again not correlated (rs = -0.20, p = .41), whereas the part B scores (rs = 0.54, p = .02) and discrepancy scores (rs = 0.59, p = .008) were significantly correlated.

Conclusions:

Results suggest that an oral version of the Trail Making Test shows promise as an alternative to the written version for assessing set shifting abilities. These findings are limited to patients with movement disorders, and future research with diverse patient populations could help determine whether O-TMT can be generalized to other patient groups. Additionally, future research should examine whether O-TMT scores obtained via virtual testing correspond with W-TMT scores obtained in-person.