Profound Associations between Maternal Infectious Disease and Fetal Neurodevelopmental Delays
Authors: Carp Theodor-Nicolae , Metoudi Michael 
Published: December 2022

Maternal infectious disease may pose considerable challenges to the fetal health due to the distribution of important elements of the sanguine and lymphatic system from the mother via the umbilical cord. The mother and the fetus have a degree of interdependence that is similar to the one between the eukaryotic cell and the mitochondrion, particularly during the first half term of the pregnancy, which explains the increased appetite of the expecting mother during the first stages of the fetal development. There is a solid bridge between the adaptive immune system and the encephalon that was only discovered a few decades ago. As a result, scientists may still be in the introductory stages of research, and there might be a significant and profound degree of association between the immune system and a healthy neurological development. There is a significant link between the onset of significant maternal infectious disease and the onset of neurodevelopmental disease in the fetus, and virtually all immune cells play major roles in the promotion and inhibition of neurogenesis alike. Likewise, there is a probability that maternal infectious diseases during pregnancy represent a risk factor of fetal neurodevelopmental disease, as a pressurised development of the adaptive immune memory could result in a pressurised or inhibited neurological development, which both can result in a delayed development of certain sub-regions of the brain. For example, the fetus may display poorer social abilities and sharp analytical skills later in life, which is an important sign of neurodevelopmental disease. A pressurised development of the adaptive immune memory could not require the development of a significant form of disease, but rather just a sharp rate of immune preparation against several important pathogenic agents during the introductory stages of life, when the encephalon experiences the sharpest increase rate in development. The problem per se is not the process of immunisation, but a much sharper process of immunisation over the first stages of life in case of an exposure to one dangerous pathogen or more numerous kinds of pathogens and antigens that normally cause moderate disease morbidity. The more dangerous the microbe is, the sharper the development of the adaptive immune memory will be, and the same happens in the case of an increased number of infectious microbes and antigens that infected the cells of the mothers and the fetuses in cause, and this may, in the majority of the situations, still be the case even if the pathogens are already significantly weakened or lifeless, given that the gain of adaptive immune memory alone constitutes an important factor of neurogenesis and an increased rate of neurological development, and that the infant will become almost or fully protected against the pathogens in cause, despite not having had experienced the disease beforehand. In this case, neurodevelopmental delays are possibly not caused by an impaired neurogenesis, but by an excessive one, whilst maternal infection-associated neurodevelopmental delays may be caused by an impaired neurogenesis. Nevertheless, the aetiology of immunity-related neurodevelopmental delays may be more complex in nature and implicate a chronological and spatial sequence of induced excedentary and deficitary rates of neurogenesis, hence reflecting the incredibly complex nature and various forms of neurodevelopmental disease. It is important to mention that a single dose of infant immunisation brings significantly lower risks of adverse neurological events than the onset of a significant maternal infectious disease during pregnancy. The objective of paediatric neuro-immunological studies may be to improve the understanding of the association between a healthy immune developmental rate and a balanced ratio of the developmental rates of important brain regions and sub-regions.