Using deep learning to extract novel and quantitative imaging features from perfluoropropane contrast, sulphur hexafluoride contrast and non-contrast stress echocardiography images
Authors: Dockerill C , Woodward W , McCourt A , Beqiri A , Parker A , Mumith A , Woodward G , Hawkes W , Hassanali N , Sabharwal N , Boardman H , Spagou N , Upton R , Leeson P 
Published: November 2020

Background

Stress echocardiography has become established as the most widely applied non-invasive imaging test for diagnosis of coronary artery disease within the UK. However, stress echocardiography has been substantially qualitative, rather than quantitative, based on visual wall motion assessment. For the first time, we have identified and validated quantitative descriptors of cardiac geometry and motion, extracted from ultrasound images acquired using contrast agents in an automated way.

Purpose

To establish whether these novel imaging features can be generated in an automated, quantifiable and reproducible way from images acquired with perfluoropropane contrast, as well as investigating how these extracted measures compare to those extracted from sulphur hexafluoride contrast and non-contrast studies.

Methods

100 patients who received perfluoropropane contrast during their stress echocardiogram were recruited. Their stress echocardiography images were processed through a deep learning algorithm. Novel feature values were recorded and a subset of 10 studies were repeated. The automated measures of global longitudinal strain (GLS) and ejection fraction (EF) extracted from these images were compared to values previously extracted from sulphur hexafluoride contrast and non-contrast images using the same software.

Results

A full set of 31 novel imaging features were successfully extracted from 79 studies acquired using the perfluoropropane contrast agent with a dropout rate of 14% (n=92, 8 incomplete image sets). Repeated analysis in a subset of 10 perfluoropropane cases demonstrated excellent reproducibility of the extracted feature values (R2=1). Automated values of GLS and EF, at both rest (GLS = −16.4±4.8%, EF = 63±13%) and stress stages (GLS = −17.7±5.8%, EF = 68±11%), were extracted from 83 perfluoropropane studies, with a dropout rate of 16% (n=99, fewer incomplete sets as short axis view not required). The ranges of GLS and EF measures extracted from the perfluoropropane images were comparable to the other contrast studies (n=222) (Rest GLS = −16.8±5.8%, Rest EF = 63±10%; Stress GLS = −19.1±6.7%, Stress EF = 71±9%) and non-contrast studies (n=86) (Rest GLS = −15.7±5.3%, Rest EF = 57±10%; Stress GLS = −17.3±6.4%, Stress EF = 61±14%).

Conclusions

Novel features and clinically relevant measures were extracted from images acquired using perfluoropropane contrast for the first time in a fully automated and reproducible way using a deep learning algorithm. The analysis failure rate and generated measures are comparable to those extracted from images using other commonly used sulphur hexafluoride contrast agents and non-contrast stress echocardiography studies. These findings demonstrate that deep learning algorithms can be used for automated quantitative analysis of stress echocardiograms acquired using various contrast agents and in non-contrast studies to improve stress echocardiography practice.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc.