P-742 In-vitro fertilization outcomes after laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect
Authors: Shin S  Y , Hwang K , Shin J  E , Choi D  H , Kim J  H 
Published: July 2024

Study question

Does laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect improve in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes?

Summary answer

Laparoscopic (LSC) repair of cesarean scar defect (CSD) should selectively indicated to patients experiencing repetitive pregnancy failure or having an increased depth of niche

What is known already

Cesarean section (CS) rate has markedly from 7% in 1990 to an estimated 29% of all births by 2030. CSD, also known as isthmocele or uterine niche, has emerged as a cause of secondary infertility, frequently encountered with recurrent implantation failures and cycle cancellations because of the endometrial fluid collection both in endometrium and uterine lower segment of cesarean scar.

Study design, size, duration

This is a retrospective study encompassing total of 62 patients. With 50 patients undergoing expectant management, 12 undergoing LSC repair of CSD at a single IVF center from 2019 to 2023. Primary outcomes included the clinical pregnancy rate and time to pregnancy, while secondary outcomes were the depth of CSD and residual myometrial thickness. Of the 72 patients, 68 patients underwent frozen embryo transfer.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Patients with secondary infertility who had experienced more than two instances of implantation failure or cycle cancellation due to endometrial fluid collection were included. Laparoscopic repair of CSD was performed by a single gynecologic oncologist in accordance with the physician’s preference and patient consent. For patients in expectant management, diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial fluid suction were conducted prior to embryo transfer.

Main results and the role of chance

The age, BMI, gravidity, parity, or the number of previous cesarean section showed no statistical differences between the expectant management and the LSC repair group. The uterine position, either anteflexion was similar across groups. (all p value &gt;0.05). Both the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate did not significantly differ between the expectant management group and the LSC repair group (26.0% vs 50.0%, p = 0.149, and 32.0% vs 60.0%, p = 0.149, respectively). The mean time to pregnancy was 7.38 months in the expectant management group and 9.80 months in LSC repair group, showed no significant difference (p = 0.240). Correlation analysis revealed a significantly moderate correlation between the initial depth of CSD and the depth of CSD at embryo transfer with clinical pregnancy (r = -0.424, P = 0.001). Furthermore, our data indicated that the CSD depth at embryo transfer was significantly impacted on clinical pregnancy outcomes from the multivariate regression logistic analysis (OR = 0.522, 95% CI [0.332 – 0.823]).

Limitations, reasons for caution

This study is retrospectively designed and including small sample size, caution is required in interpreting the findings.

Wider implications of the findings

This study suggests that the depth of niche influences clinical pregnancy outcomes. Laparoscopic repair may offer a viable treatment option who have experienced multiple failed cycles and increased depth of niche. Future studies with larger population studies may further indicate the LSC repair based on the depth of CSD.

Trial registration number

not applicable