bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025 huggingface dataset:
An FDA-pooled analysis of frontline combination treatment benefits by risk groups in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
Authors: Lee Daniel , Gittleman Haley , Weinstock Chana , Suzman Daniel L. , Bloomquist Erik , Agrawal Sundeep , Brave Michael Holman , Brewer Jamie Renee , Singh Harpreet , Tang Shenghui , Pazdur Richard , Beaver Julia A. , Ibrahim Amna , Amiri-Kordestani Laleh
Published: June 2021

4559

Background: The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model was developed for prognosis of patients with mRCC treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted monotherapy in the first-line setting. Efficacy in trials of anti-VEGF therapy has been generally consistent across risk groups, including for overall survival (OS). For trials of immunotherapy combinations, the small numbers of OS events for the favorable risk group in each trial limited reliable conclusions; however, there was a suggestion of possible differential effects on OS between favorable risk and other risk groups. Methods: We pooled individual patient data (n=3447) from four phase III randomized trials of combinations of immunotherapy + immunotherapy (n=1) or immunotherapy + anti-VEGF therapy (n=3) submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration in support of marketing applications. All trials calculated IMDC risk group for each patient and used a control arm of sunitinib. We combined intermediate and poor prognostic groups (“intermediate/poor”) and compared their OS to that of the favorable risk group using Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards methods. Results: In this pooled analysis, treatment with combination immune checkpoint therapy did not demonstrate an improvement in OS compared to sunitinib in the favorable risk group (HR 0.953; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.27). An improvement in OS was observed in the intermediate/poor risk group (HR 0.696; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.78). Conclusions: Our analysis of OS in patients treated with immunotherapy combinations compared to sunitinib suggests possible differential benefit in the favorable risk compared to the intermediate/poor risk group. These results are not conclusive and considered exploratory due to the relative immaturity of OS in the favorable risk group. Follow-up for survival continues in each study to allow for more definitive results.[Table: see text]
Efficacy of avelumab + axitinib (A + Ax) versus sunitinib (S) by IMDC risk group in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Extended follow-up results from JAVELIN Renal 101.
Authors: Haanen John B. A. G. , Larkin James , Choueiri Toni K. , Albiges Laurence , Rini Brian I. , Atkins Michael B. , Schmidinger Manuela , Penkov Konstantin , Thomaidou Despina , Wang Jing , Mariani Mariangela , Di Pietro Alessandra , Motzer Robert J.
Published: June 2021

4574

Background: In the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006), treatment-naive patients with aRCC receiving A + Ax showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) across International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups (favorable [F], intermediate [I], and poor [P]) compared with patients receiving S. Here we report updated efficacy results for A + Ax vs S by IMDC risk groups from the third interim analysis. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either A (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) plus Ax (5 mg orally twice daily) or S (50 mg orally once daily) for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). Patients were categorized per IMDC risk group into F, I, and P subgroups, and outcomes were assessed for F, I, P, and I + P. Overall survival (OS) and PFS, ORR, complete response (CR), and duration of response (DoR) per investigator assessment (RECIST v1.1) were assessed. Results: The study enrolled 886 patients with aRCC. At data cutoff (Apr 2020), median (95% CI) follow-up for OS in the A + Ax was NR (42.2-NE) vs 37.8 (31.4-NE) months with S. The Table shows OS, PFS, ORR, CR, and DOR by IMDC risk group. A + Ax generally showed improved efficacy compared with S across IMDC groups. Conclusions: Consistent with previously reported results from prior interim analyses, extended follow-up confirms the efficacy benefits of A + Ax vs S across IMDC risk groups in patients with aRCC. Patients continue to be followed up for the final OS analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006. [Table: see text]
Efficacy outcomes of nivolumab + cabozantinib versus pembrolizumab + axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).
Authors: McGregor Bradley Alexander , Geynisman Daniel M. , Burotto Mauricio , Porta Camillo , Suarez Rodriguez Cristina , Bourlon Maria Teresa , Barata Pedro C. , Gulati Shuchi , Stwalley Brian , Del Tejo Viviana , Du Ella X. , Wu Aozhou , Chin Andi , Betts Keith A. , Huo Stephen , Choueiri Toni K.
Published: June 2021

4578

Background: Nivolumab in combination with cabozantinib (N+C) has demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS), compared with sunitinib as a first-line (1L) treatment for aRCC in the phase 3 CheckMate (CM) 9ER trial. As there are no head-to-head trials comparing N+C with pembrolizumab in combination with axitinib (P+A), this study compared the efficacy of N+C with P+A as 1L treatment in aRCC. Methods: An MAIC was conducted using individual patient data on N+C (N = 323) from the CM 9ER trial (median follow-up: 23.5 months) and published data on P+A (N = 432) from the KEYNOTE (KN)-426 trialof P+A (median follow-up: 30.6 months). Individual patients within the CM 9ER trial population were reweighted to match the key patient characteristics published in KN-426 trial, including age, gender, previous nephrectomy, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk score, and sites of metastasis. After weighting, hazards ratios (HR) of PFS, duration of response (DoR), and OS comparing N+C vs. P+A were estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazards models, and ORR was compared using a weighted Wald test. All comparisons were conducted using the corresponding sunitinib arms as an anchor. Results: After weighting, patient characteristics in the CM 9ER trial were comparable to those in the KN-426 trial. In the weighted population, N+C had a median PFS of 19.3 months (95% CI: 15.2, 22.4) compared to a median PFS of 15.7 months (95% CI: 13.7, 20.6) for P+A. Using sunitinib as an anchor arm, N+C was associated with a 30% reduction in risk of progression or death compared to P+A, (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.93; P = 0.015; table). In addition, N+C was associated with numerically, although not statistically, higher improvement in ORR vs sunitinib (difference: 8.4%, 95% CI: -1.7%, 18.4%; P = 0.105) and improved DoR (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.31; P = 0.359). Similar OS outcomes were observed for N+C and P+A (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.44; P = 0.940). Conclusions: After adjusting for cross-trial differences, N+C had a more favorable efficacy profile compared to P+A, including statistically significant PFS benefits, numerically improved ORR and DoR, and similar OS.[Table: see text]
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.
Authors: Nazha Bassel , Dada Hiba I. , Drusbosky Leylah , Brown Jacqueline T , Ravindranathan Deepak , Carthon Bradley Curtis , Kucuk Omer , Master Viraj A. , Bilen Mehmet Asim
Published: June 2021

4585

Background: Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatments in the advanced setting. Molecular pathways with tumor suppressor genes (e.g. TP53, CDKN2A) and oncogenes (e.g. CTNNB1 and RAS) are implicated in oncogenesis. To our knowledge, the genomic landscape of ctDNA alterations for ACC has not been described in a large cohort. We report plasma-based ctDNA alterations in patients with advanced ACC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated genomic data from 102 patients with ACC who had ctDNA testing between 12/2016 – 10/2020 using Guardant360 (Guardant Health, CA). ctDNA analysis interrogated single nucleotide variants (SNV), fusions, indels and copy number variations (CNV) of up to 83 genes. We evaluated the frequency of genomic alterations, the landscape of co-occurring mutations, and pathogenic or likely pathogenic alterations with potential targeted therapies. The prevalence of alterations identified in ctDNA were compared to those detected in tissue using a publicly available database (cBioPortal). Results: The median age was 54 years (range 24-81), and 55% of patients were male. Among the entire cohort, 84 pts (82.4%) had ≥1 somatic alteration detected. Mutations were most frequently detected in TP53 (52%), EGFR (23%), CTNNB1 (18%), MET (18%), and ATM (14%). The frequencies detected in ctDNA were similar to the results detected in tissue. Pathogenic and/or likely pathogenic mutations in therapeutically relevant alterations were observed in 36 patients (35%), including EGFR, BRAF, MET, CDKN2A, and CDK4/6 (Table 1). The most frequently co-occurring mutations were EGFR + TP53 (14%), EGFR + MET (11%), BRAF + MET (10%). Conclusions: Blood-based ctDNA profiling in advanced ACC provided comprehensive genomic data in most patients, with a similar profile to tumor tissue analyses. Over one third of patients had actionable mutations with approved therapies in other cancers. This approach might inform the development of personalized treatment options for this aggressive malignancy.[Table: see text]
Decreased fracture rate by mandating bone protecting agents in the EORTC 1333/PEACEIII trial combining Ra223 with enzalutamide versus enzalutamide alone: An updated safety analysis.
Authors: Gillessen Silke , Choudhury Ananya , Rodriguez-Vida Alejo , Nole Franco , Gallardo Diaz Enrique , Roumeguere Thierry Andre , Daugaard Gedske , Loriot Yohann , Saad Fred , McDermott Raymond S. , Neven Anouk , Fournier Beatrice , TOMBAL Bertrand F.
Published: June 2021

5002

Background: The randomized phase III EORTC-1333-GUCG (NCT02194842) trial compares enzalutamide vs. a combination of Radium 223 and enzalutamide in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. The premature unblinding of ERA223 (NCT02043678) in Nov 2017 due to a significant increase in the rate of fractures in the combination of abiraterone and Ra223 arm led to the implementation of the mandatory use of bone protecting agents (BPA) in the EORTC-1333-GUCG trial. Skeletal fractures, pathological or not, are a frequent and underestimated adverse event of systemic treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Whether this mandated use of BPA (zoledronic acid or denosumab) would mitigate the risk of fractures in this patient population was unclear. An early safety analysis (Tombal, ASCO, 2019) suggested that the risk of fractures was well controlled in both arms when patients receive BPA. We present here an updated analysis of fracture incidence with longer follow-up. Methods: As of 28/01/2021, a total of 253 patients (134 after making BPA mandatory) were randomized between enzalutamide/Ra223 and enzalutamide. The fracture rate was estimated with the cumulative incidence method in the safety population of 237 (122 after making BPA mandatory) treated patients. Death in absence of fracture was analyzed as competing risk and censoring was applied at last follow-up. Results: Overall, 69.5% of enzalutamide/Ra223 patients (95.2% after making BPA mandatory) and 73.1% of enzalutamide patients (95% after making BPA mandatory) received BPA on treatment: 13.6% in the enzalutamide/Ra223 arm and 21.8% in the enzalutamide arm did not use BPA at registration, but started during protocol treatment and 55.9% and 51.3% respectively, received BPA since entry. At 36.7 months median follow-up in patients without BPA and 23.1 months median follow-up in patients receiving BPA, a total of 39 patients reported a fracture. Among them, 30 patients (20 in enzalutamide/Ra223 arm) did not receive BPA and 9 (4 in the enzalutamide/Ra223 arm) received BPA (see table). Conclusions: The updated safety analysis confirms the early fracture rate results. In the absence of BPA, the risk of fracture is increased when RA223 is added to enzalutamide. Strikingly, in both arms, the risk remains almost abolished by a preventive continuous administration of BPA, thus stressing the importance of complying to international recommendations in terms of giving BPA to mCRPC patients. This study is sponsored by EORTC and supported by Bayer and Astellas. Clinical trial information: NCT02194842. [Table: see text]
COMBAT-CRPC: Concurrent administration of bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) and nivolumab in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Authors: Markowski Mark Christopher , Taplin Mary-Ellen , Aggarwal Rahul Raj , Wang Hao , Lalji Aliya , Paller Channing Judith , Marshall Catherine Handy , Carducci Michael Anthony , Eisenberger Mario A. , De Marzo Angelo M , Denmeade Samuel R. , Antonarakis Emmanuel S.
Published: June 2021

5014

Background: During BAT, intramuscular (IM) testosterone (T) is administered, which results in rapid cycling of serum T levels from supraphysiologic to near-castrate in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We previously observed anecdotal clinical responses to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in mCRPC patients (pts) previously treated with BAT and hypothesized that that a BAT/ICB combination would be synergistic. Here we report a prospective phase 2 study of men with mCRPC treated with BAT in combination with nivolumab. Methods: This was a multi-center, single arm, open label phase 2 trial (NCT03554317) of men with mCRPC who received T cypionate 400mg IM (BAT) every 28 days and nivolumab 480mg IV every 28 days. LHRH agonist treatment was continued. All pts received BAT as single agent therapy for a 12-week lead-in prior to the addition of nivolumab. Eligible pts were those with asymptomatic mCRPC who had soft tissue disease amenable to biopsy and progressed on at least one prior novel AR targeted therapy. Up to one line of chemotherapy was allowed for the treatment of mCRPC disease. The primary endpoint was confirmed PSA50 response rate. Key secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR), and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). The trial was designed to detect a 20% absolute increase in PSA50 response rate from the null of 25%. Results: 45 pts were enrolled on study and treated. The confirmed PSA50 response rate was 40.0% (N=18/45, 95% CI: 26-56%, P=0.02 against the 25% null hypothesis). For pts with measureable disease, the ORR was 23.8% (N=10/42). Median rPFS on BAT and nivolumab was estimated at 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.9-7.8 months). 11.1% (N=5/45) of pts were free from radiographic progression for 11 or more months. One patient achieved a complete radiographic response, which is ongoing (>13 months). The majority of adverse events (AE) were Grade <2. The most common AEs were edema (20%), nausea (20%), and back pain (13%). Immune related AE (irAE) were generally mild (Grade <2) with N=2 Grade 3 irAE observed (pericarditis, lipase elevation). Serial biopsies were obtained on trial for translational studies. Conclusions: BAT plus nivolumab was well tolerated without concerning safety signals. The combination met the pre-specified primary endpoint of confirmed PSA50 response in a heavily treated population. Durable responses were observed in a subset of pts. Biomarker analysis is ongoing to identify a molecular signature predictive of response. Clinical trial information: NCT03554317. [Table: see text]
Characterization of findings on prostate cancer tumor sequencing that should prompt consideration for germline testing.
Authors: Truong Hong , Breen Kelsey , Kemel Yelena , Lenis Andrew Thomas , Reisz Peter , Benfante Nicole , Ehdaie Behfar , Touijer Karim A. , Laudone Vincent Paul , Scardino Peter T. , Eastham James Andrew , Joseph Vijai , Birsoy Ozge , Mandelker Diana , Stadler Zsofia Kinga , Offit Kenneth , Morris Michael J. , Abida Wassim , Robson Mark E. , Carlo Maria Isabel
Published: June 2021

5022

Background: Tumor sequencing is increasingly used for therapeutic selection in men with advanced prostate cancer (PC). If tumor-only sequencing is performed without matched germline, identified mutations could be of somatic or germline origin. Germline mutations could confer additional risk for other cancers to the patient and at-risk family members. The objective of this study is to determine the overall and gene-specific probability of pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline mutations based on tumor-only sequencing. Methods: We investigated mutations found in a cohort of men with PC who underwent targeted next generation sequencing of PC tumor and matched peripheral blood using the MSK-IMPACT assay between 01/2015 and 01/2020. A germline probability for each gene was determined by dividing the number of germline mutations by the total number of somatic and germline mutations. Cancer susceptibility genes commonly sequenced on tumor-based tests for PC were assessed, including ATM, BRCA1/ 2, BRIP1, CHEK2, HOXB13, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, PALB2, PMS2 (henceforth referred to as PC genes). Results: A total of 1883 men with PC were included, with median age of diagnosis of 62.0 ± 8.8 years. 84% had high risk PC, 52% had metastasis, 38% had family history of PC. A total of 364 (19%) men had at least one mutation (either somatic or germline) in PC genes. Overall, 189 (10%) men had at least one germline mutation that would not have been reported as germline without matched normal. The average germline probability of PC genes was 40% (range: 0% in MLH1 to 83% in CHEK2). The number of total mutations, germline mutations, and germline probability of genes found in > 0.5% of the study cohort are summarized in Table. All these genes are moderate/high penetrance autosomal dominant genes with established guidelines for cascade testing, enhanced cancer screening, or potential risk-reducing surgery. Conclusions: In this study, an average of 40% of mutations found in cancer susceptibility genes on PC tumor sequencing were germline mutations. Men undergoing tumor-only sequencing should be counseled on the possibility of uncovering a germline mutation. In addition to BRCA1/ 2, mutations in certain genes, such as CHEK2 and PALB2, have a high probability of being germline and should prompt referral for genetic counseling and germline testing.[Table: see text]
Pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide for enzalutamide-resistant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Updated analyses after one additional year of follow-up from cohorts 4 and 5 of the KEYNOTE-199 study.
Authors: Graff Julie N , Tagawa Scott T. , Hoimes Christopher J. , Gerritsen Winald R. , Vaishampayan Ulka N. , Elliott Tony , Hwang Clara , Ten Tije A. J. , Omlin Aurelius , McDermott Raymond S. , Fradet Yves , Kilari Deepak , Ferrario Cristiano , Uemura Hiroji , Niu Cuizhen , Poehlein Christian Heinrich , De Wit Ronald , Schloss Charles , De Bono Johann S. , Antonarakis Emmanuel S.
Published: June 2021

5042

Background: KEYNOTE-199 (NCT02787005) is a multicohort phase 2 study to evaluate pembrolizumab (pembro) in mCRPC. A previous analysis of patients with RECIST-measurable (cohort 4 [C4]) or bone-predominant nonmeasurable (cohort 5 [C5]) disease who were chemotherapy-naive and had progression while on enzalutamide (enza) found that pembro + enza showed antitumor activity and manageable safety. Long-term outcomes are of interest with immunotherapy; hence, updated efficacy and safety data after an additional 1 year of follow-up are presented. Methods: Pts were eligible if they had resistance to enza after prior response. Prior treatment with abiraterone was allowed. Pts received pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles + enza QD until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary end point was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) in C4. Secondary end points were DOR (C4), and DCR, rPFS, OS and safety (both cohorts). Results: 126 pts (C4, 81; C5, 45) were treated. Median age was 72 years (range 43-92), 32.5% had visceral disease and 87.3% previously received ≥6 mo of enzalutamide; 121 pts (96.0%) discontinued, most because of progressive disease. Median (range) time from enrollment to data cutoff was 31.7 mo (23.1-37.1) in C4 and 35.5 mo (22.9-37.3) in C5. In C4, confirmed ORR was 12.3% (95% CI 6.1-21.5) (2 CRs, 8 PRs); median (range) DOR was 8.1 mo (2.5+ to 15.2), and 62.5% had a response ≥6 mo (Kaplan-Meier estimate). Additional efficacy analyses are outlined in the table. A total of 27.2% and 28.9% of pts in C4 and C5, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. Two pts in C4 died of immune-related AEs (Miller Fisher syndrome and myasthenia gravis). Incidence of any-grade (34.1%) and grade 3 or 4 (5.6%) rash, regardless of relatedness to treatment, was higher than previously reported for individual agents but manageable with standard-of-care treatments; 2 pts discontinued because of rash. Conclusions: After an additional 1 year of follow-up, pembro + enza continued to show antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with mCRPC who became resistant to enza. The treatment combination is being further evaluated in the ongoing phase 3 KEYNOTE-641 trial (NCT03834493). Clinical trial information: NCT02787005. [Table: see text]
Radiographic progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint of overall survival in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.
Authors: Halabi Susan , Roy Akash , Yang Qian , Xie Wanling , Kelly William Kevin , Sweeney Christopher
Published: June 2021

5057

Background: Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) is commonly used as a co-primary endpoint in randomized clinical trials in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, rPFS has not been established as a valid surrogate endpoint of overall survival (OS) in men with mCRPC. Here, we hypothesized that rPFS is a reliable surrogate for OS in mCRPC. We also explored whether PFS is a valid surrogate endpoint of OS at the aggregate trial level. Methods: We performed a systematic search of the literature encompassing the period January 2004-December 2020 using PubMed and clinical trials.gov to identify completed phase III trials in mCRPC post-docetaxel. Eligible trials had to be randomized phase III therapeutic trials that reported OS, PFS or rPFS. OS was measured from the date of random assignment to date of death from any cause or date of last follow-up. rPFS was defined as the time from random assignment to date of disease progression on CT and/or Tc bone scan per trial definition or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS included PSA progression as a component of the composite endpoint. Trial level surrogacy was evaluated by fitting linear regression on the treatment effect of rPFS (or PFS) and OS (in other words, the weighted linear regression of the log(hazard ratio) of OS on the log(hazard ratio) of rPFS). It was pre-specified that rPFS would be considered a valid surrogate for OS if R² was 0·7 or higher. Results: We identified 33 in men with mCRPC post docetaxel approval. We assessed the association between PFS and OS in 29,456 patients from 30 trials. Overall, a moderate correlation was observed at the trial level between OS and PFS ( R2 = 0.46, 95 %CI = 0.20-0.68) in these trials. In 18 trials with 16,818 mCRPC patients where rPFS was considered as a key endpoint, a moderate correlation between the treatment effects on rPFS and OS was observed at the trial level ( R2= 0.65, 95% CI = 0.23-0.87). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates moderate correlation between treatment effects of rPFS and OS in patients with mCRPC. However, rPFS did not meet the pre-specified surrogacy threshold of 0.7. Clinical trial information: several.
Genomic landscape of MSH6-mutated clinically advanced castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Authors: Bratslavsky Gennady , Decker Brennan , Jacob Joseph M , Necchi Andrea , Spiess Philippe E. , Grivas Petros , Lin Douglas I. , Ramkissoon Shakti H. , Severson Eric Allan , Huang Richard S.P. , Mata Douglas A. , Madison Russell , Montesion Meagan , Gjoerup Ole , Sokol Ethan , Pavlick Dean C. , Danziger Natalie , Ross Jeffrey S.
Published: June 2021

5062

Background: Loss-of-function genomic alterations (GAs) in MSH6 have been associated with a unique subtype of hypermutated mCRPC that is often microsatellite stable (MSS) and may occur in either a sporadic or familial Lynch Syndrome-like clinical setting. Methods: 5,617 mCRPC cases were sequenced to evaluate all classes of GA using a hybrid capture-based FDA-approved comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined on 0.8 Mb of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability high (MSI-High) was determined on 95 loci. MSI-low status was not assessed. Results: 78 (1.4%) mCRPC were MSH6mut (Table). MSH6mut mCRPC included 73.1% short variant mutations, 23.1% biallelic deletions, 2.6% genomic rearrangements, and 1.3% multiple GAs/sample. Co-mutation of MSH2 was found in 28% of MSH6mut cases vs. 2% in MSH6wt cases (P <.0001) and was most frequently caused by biallelic co-deletion of both genes (73% of co-mutated cases). MSI-High status was present in 46% of MSH6mut mCRPC, which was significantly greater than the 2% seen in MSH6wt cases (P <.0001). An MMR single nucleotide mutational signature was observed in 65% of MSH6mut cases, compared to 3% MSH6wt cases (P <.0001). Among MSH6mut cases with neither MSI-High nor MMR mutational signature, 87% did not have biallelic loss of MSH6 or any other MMR gene, confirming that monoallelic pathogenic mutations are insufficient to cause the MMR-D phenotype. For subjects whose variants could be classified, 45% (19/42) of pathogenic MSH6 alleles were germline; of these, 58% (11/19) had neither MSI-High nor an MMR single nucleotide signature. MSH6mut cases had fewer TMPRSS2: ERG fusions (P =.01), but harbored significantly higher frequencies of GAs in AR (P =.0002), ATM (P =.04), PIK3CA (P =.0003), APC (P =.005), ERBB2 (P =.001), and CDK6 (p =.046), likely at least partially attributable to the higher TMB in MSH6mutcases (P <.0001). Conclusions: MSH6mut mCRPC is a unique disease that often features a hypermutated genomic signature, although only 46% of cases exhibited MSI-high status. This complex phenotype highlights the potential utility of multiple rather than single biomarkers to understand tumor biology and determine patients who may benefit from immunotherapy.[Table: see text]
The efficacy of enzalutamide (ENZA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on bone oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A post hoc analysis of ARCHES.
Authors: Armstrong Andrew J. , Iguchi Taro , Azad Arun , Villers Arnauld , Alekseev Boris , Petrylak Daniel P. , Szmulewitz Russell Zelig , Alcaraz Antonio , Shore Neal D. , Holzbeierlein Jeffrey , Gomez-Veiga Francisco , Rosbrook Brad , Zohren Fabian , Haas Gabriel P. , Gourgioti Georgia , El-Chaar Nader N. , Stenzl Arnulf
Published: June 2021

5071

Background: In ARCHES (NCT02677896), ENZA + ADT reduced the risk of radiographic progression and improved secondary clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) with variable patterns of disease spread over placebo (PBO) + ADT. This post hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ENZA + ADT in patients with bone oligometastatic mHSPC compared to polymetastatic mHSPC in ARCHES. Methods: Patients with mHSPC (n = 1150) were randomized 1:1 to ENZA (160 mg/day) + ADT or PBO + ADT, stratified by disease volume and prior docetaxel chemotherapy. This post hoc analysis included patients with bone metastases only, categorized as oligometastatic (1–≤5 metastases) or as polymetastatic (≥6 metastases) based on central review at screening. Efficacy outcomes were compared across treatment arms. Results: Of the ARCHES population with bone metastases (n = 512), the largest subgroup included patients with ≤5 metastases (ENZA + ADT, n = 160; PBO + ADT, n = 136). Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between treatment arms and across subgroups. When compared to PBO + ADT, ENZA + ADT improved rPFS and secondary endpoints in patients with ≤5 metastases (Table). Similar results were observed across other oligometastatic subgroups (1–≤4) as well as in polymetastatic disease (≥6). The safety profile of ENZA + ADT versus PBO + ADT was similar across subgroups and consistent with previous findings. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis demonstrates that ENZA + ADT provides clinical benefit across bone oligometastatic as well as polymetastatic mHSPC, supporting the utility of ENZA irrespective of metastatic burden in the ARCHES study. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896. [Table: see text]
Outcome of breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy compared with non-pregnant controls.
Authors: Amant Frederic , Nekljudova Valentina , Maggen Charlotte , Seither Fenja , Neven Patrick , Cardonick Elyce , Schmatloch Sabine , Van Calsteren Kristel , Cordes Tatjana , de Haan Jorine , Lok Christianne AR , Bechtner Christina , Boere Ingrid A. , Gziri Mina Mhallem , Solbach Christine , Lefrère Hanne , Schneeweiss Andreas , Witzel Isabell , Seiler Sabine , Loibl Sibylle
Published: June 2021

515

Background: Overall a diagnosis of breast cancer during pregnancy (BCP) appears not to impact maternal prognosis if standard treatment is offered. However, caution is warranted as gestational changes in pharmacokinetics with respect to the distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs may lead to reduced chemotherapy concentration in pregnant patients. This cohort study was designed to focus on the maternal prognosis of BCP patients that receive chemotherapy during pregnancy. Methods: The outcome of BCP patients treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy was compared to non-pregnant breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, diagnosed after 2000, excluding postpartum diagnosis and with an age limit of 45 years. The data was registered by two multicentric registries (the International Network of Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy and the German Breast Cancer Group) that collect both retro-and prospectively breast cancer data. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between both groups, adjusting for age, stage, grade, hormone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor 2 status and histology, weighted by propensity scoring in order to account for the differences in baseline characteristics between pregnant patients and controls. Results: In total, 662 pregnant and 2081 non-pregnant patients, were eligible for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 34 (range 22-47) years for pregnant and 38 (range 19-45) years for non-pregnant patients. Pregnant patients were more likely to have stage II breast cancer (60.1% vs 56.1%, p = 0.035), grade 3 tumors (74.0% vs 62.2%, p < 0.001), hormone receptor-negative tumors (48.4% vs 34.0%, p < 0.001) or triple-negative breast cancer (38.9% vs 26.9%, p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 66 months. DFS and OS were comparable for pregnant and non-pregnant patients (DFS: HR 1.02, 95%CI 0.82-1.27, p = 0.83; OS: HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81-1.45, p = 0.59). A subgroup analysis of 339 women that received more than 60% of chemotherapy during pregnancy (cut-off at median) revealed a comparable survival compared to non-pregnant women (DFS: HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.62-1.06, p = 0.13; OS: HR 0.85 95% CI 0.58-1.23, p = 0.39). Conclusions: Pregnancy-induced alternations in chemotherapy concentration do not seem to affect maternal prognosis in breast cancer patients. These results support initiation of chemotherapy for BCP where indicated for oncological reasons.
Efficacy and safety analysis of Chinese patients in monarchE: Abemaciclib combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy for high risk HR+, HER2- early breast cancer.
Authors: Zhimin Shao , Zhang Qingyuan , Song Chuan-gui , Ouyang Quchang , Liu Zhenzhen , Liu Qiang , Feng Jifeng , Chiu Joanne Wing Yan , Tseng Ling-Ming , Qian Chenxi
Published: June 2021

522

Background: In monarchE, abemaciclib (oral CDK4&6 inhibitor) plus endocrine therapy (ET) as adjuvant treatment for HR+, HER2- high risk early breast cancer (EBC), demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) compared to ET alone. Here we present the efficacy and safety analysis of Chinese patients from monarchE. Methods: The overall study design was reported previously. Eligible patients were randomized to receive abemaciclib (150 mg BID for 2 years) combined with standard adjuvant ET or ET alone. The primary endpoint was IDFS per STEEP criteria. Secondary endpoints included distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), overall survival, and safety. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted among Chinese patients enrolled from Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Results: A total of 501 Chinese patients were randomized to receive abemaciclib plus ET (259 patients) or ET alone (242 patients). At the time of data cutoff (July 8, 2020), 356 (71.1%) patients were still in the 2-year treatment period. A total of 26 IDFS events were observed (11 and 15 events in abemaciclib plus ET and ET arm, respectively). Comparing to ET alone, abemaciclib combined with ET reduced the risk of developing invasive disease or death by 34.3% (HR: 0.657, 95% CI: 0.301, 1.435) for Chinese patients, together with a clinically meaningful improvement in the 2-year IDFS rate (95.6% vs 92.1%). The addition of abemaciclib to ET also resulted in an improvement in DRFS (HR: 0.601, 95% CI: 0.245, 1.477) for Chinese patients, with the 2-year DRFS rate at 96.7% (ET alone: 93.4%). In the abemaciclib arm, the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and grade ≥3 TEAEs: diarrhea (90.3% and 5.0%), leukopenia (76.8% and 21.2%), and neutropenia (76.4% and 23.9%), respectively. Conclusions: Abemaciclib combined with adjuvant ET demonstrated clinically meaningful IDFS and DRFS benefits among Chinese patients with HR+, HER2-, high risk EBC, which was consistent with the ITT population as reported previously. The safety profile of abemaciclib in Chinese EBC patients was consistent with global population and also with that observed in Chinese metastatic breast cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03155997.
Association between treatment duration and overall survival in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer patients receiving extended adjuvant therapy with neratinib in the ExteNET trial.
Authors: Moy Beverly , Takahashi Masato , Ohtani Shoichiro , Chmielowska Ewa , Yamamoto Naohito , Coudert Bruno P. , Xu Feng , Wong Alvin F. , Chan Arlene
Published: June 2021

540

Background: Completion of planned treatment has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. In the ExteNET trial (NCT00878709), where diarrhea prophylaxis was not mandated, 17% of patients (pts) discontinued neratinib early due to diarrhea. This compares with 3.3% of pts from the CONTROL trial (NCT02400476) who used a neratinib dose-escalation strategy. Prior analyses have shown improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in pts who completed planned duration of neratinib therapy in ExteNET (Table). Here we assess outcomes, including overall survival (OS), for pts who completed planned therapy in 3 groups from ExteNET: intent-to-treat (ITT) population; pts with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease who initiated neratinib within 1y after prior trastuzumab (HR+/≤1y, the population neratinib is approved for in the EU); and HR+/≤1y with residual disease post-neoadjuvant therapy (no pathologic complete response [pCR]). Methods: Pts with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer received oral neratinib 240 mg/d or placebo after trastuzumab-based (neo)adjuvant therapy. Pts who completed neratinib therapy (defined as ≥11m or cessation of neratinib if recurrence occurred prior to 11m) were compared with placebo (all randomized pts). iDFS and OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods; hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional-hazards models. Data cutoff: July 2019. Results: There were 2840 pts in the ITT population. The table shows iDFS and OS in the overall population and in pts who completed planned duration of neratinib therapy. Completion of planned neratinib was associated with improvements in iDFS and OS in all groups evaluated. Conclusions: These descriptive findings suggest that pts who receive the recommended duration of treatment of 1y with neratinib may have improved outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT00878709. [Table: see text]
Long-term outcomes of patients with node-negative (N0), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy according to stromal TILs (sTILs).
Authors: Leon-Ferre Roberto Antonio , Carter Jodi M , Hillman David W. , Tenner Kathleen S. , Zahrieh David , Liu Minetta C. , Ingle James N. , Kalari Krishna R. , Visscher Daniel W. , Boughey Judy Caroline , Couch Fergus , Goetz Matthew P.
Published: June 2021

548

Background: sTILs are a well-established prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with operable TNBC receiving pre or postoperative systemic therapy. We1 and others2,3 have also shown that sTILs are prognostic in patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Here, we detail the outcomes of systemically untreated patients with N0 TNBC according to sTIL score. We focused on the N0 subset as a group of patients who may be candidates for future prospective therapy de-escalation trials. Methods: From a clinically annotated cohort of 605 patients with centrally confirmed TNBC (ER/PR < 1% and HER2 negative) with long-term outcomes data, we identified 182 patients treated with locoregional therapy only (breast surgery +/- radiation therapy and no chemotherapy). The clinicopathological characteristics of this cohort have previously been published1. In this analysis, we report the 5- and 10-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of patients with N0 TNBC according to sTIL levels. IDFS and OS were defined as per the STEEP classification and estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Comparisons of the survival distributions between groups were assessed by the log-rank test. sTILs were assessed as a continuous parameter according to the International TIL Working Group guidelines. For comparisons of outcomes between groups, tumors were classified as lymphocyte-predominant TNBC (defined as containing ≥50% sTILs) vs non-lymphocyte-predominant ( < 50% sTILs). Results: Of 182 systemically untreated patients, 149 (82%) were N0 and most (78%) were post-menopausal. T stage distribution was T1: 68%, T2: 28%, T3/4: 4%. Among N0 patients, 31 (21%) had lymphocyte-predominant TNBC, and in this group the 5-year iDFS and OS were 89% (95% CI 76-100) and 96% (95% CI 89-100), while the 10-year iDFS and OS were 89% (95% CI 76-100) and 87% (95% CI 73-100), respectively. In contrast, outcomes for patients with non-lymphocyte predominant TNBC were significantly worse. For this group, 5-year iDFS and OS were 62% (95% CI 53-73) and 78% (95% CI 71-86) while the 10-year iDFS and OS were 45% (95% CI 36-58) and 66% (95% CI 68-76), respectively ( log-rank p = 0.02 for iDFS and log-rank p = 0.03 for OS). Conclusions: sTIL quantification identifies a subset of patients with early-stage N0 TNBC with an exceedingly good prognosis, even in the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. These data provide support for the evaluation of sTILs as part of prospective investigation of systemic therapy de-escalation strategies in N0 TNBC. References:1Leon-Ferre et al, Breast Cancer Res Treat (2018) 167:89-99 2Park et al, Ann Oncol (2019) 12:1941-1949 3De Jong et al, ESMO 2020
Molecular characterization of luminal breast tumors in African American women.
Authors: Simons Yael , Hassan Mohamed , Chlipala George , Danciu Oana Cristina , Gadi Vijayakrishna K. , Singh Manmeet , Mohapatra Gayatry , Hoskins Kent
Published: June 2021

550

Background: Racial disparities in breast cancer (BC) mortality are attributed to later stage diagnoses and a higher incidence of triple-negative BC among African American (AA) women. In previous work, we showed that AA women with ER+ BC are more likely to develop biologically aggressive disease and are more likely to die from early stage, ER+ BC than non-Hispanic White women (Hoskins et al, JAMA Oncol, 2021). The underlying molecular drivers of this disparity are unknown. Here we report the molecular characterization of a series of luminal BC from AA women. Methods: Consecutive breast tumor specimens received in the Pathology Department underwent next generation sequencing (NGS). Unstained FFPE tissue sections were macro-dissected to isolate tumor cells, and nucleic acids were extracted using commercially available kits. DNA and RNA sequencing libraries were prepared with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 (OCAv3) (Thermo Fisher), which includes 161 driver genes and detects SNVs, CNVs, INDELs and gene fusions. Sequencing was performed on the Ion S5XL sequencer. Sequencing reads were mapped to the UCSC human genome build GRCh37/hg19 using Torrent Suite™ software (version 5.10; Thermo Fisher). Data analysis and variant calling was performed using the Ion Reporter analysis tool. Results: We identified 60 somatic driver gene alterations in luminal tumors from 35 AA patients (primary tumors, n = 26; metastatic tumors, n = 9). Recurrently altered genes identified in > 5% of tumors are listed in the Table. The most frequently altered gene was PIK3CA (42% of tumors). ESR1 gene fusions were seen in 25% of tumors. Interestingly, an equal frequency of ESR1 fusions were detected in primary (27%) and metastatic (22%) tumors, in contrast to activating mutations which are found in recurrent tumors following treatment with aromatase inhibitors. ARID1A alterations were identified in 17% of primary tumors. ARID1A encodes a subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Alterations in ARID1A confer endocrine resistance, and are enriched in recurrent tumors in the literature. We also found a high number of CNVs in members of the FGF gene family (36% of tumors), which are also associated with resistance to endocrine therapy. An in silico analysis comparing our findings with publicly available datasets will be presented. Conclusions: This study of somatic driver gene alterations in a consecutive series of luminal breast tumors from AA patients found a higher than expected frequency of alterations in genes associated with endocrine resistance in untreated primary tumors, suggesting a partial explanation for racial disparities in survival.[Table: see text]
Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (P+T) in patients (Pts) with uterine cancer (UC) with ERBB2 or ERBB3 amplification, overexpression or mutation: Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study.
Authors: Ali-Ahmad Hussein Moustapha , Rothe Michael , Mangat Pam K. , Garrett-Mayer Liz , Ahn Eugene , Chan John , Maitland Michael L. , Balmanoukian Ani Sarkis , Patel Sapna R. , Reese Zachary , Drescher Charles W. , Leath Charles A. , Li Rui , Tsimberidou Apostolia Maria , Schilsky Richard L.
Published: June 2021

5508

Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of UC pts with ERBB2 or ERBB3 amplification , overexpression or mutation treated with P+T are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced UC, no standard treatment options, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate organ function. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts matched to P+T had UC with ERBB2 or ERBB3 amplification or overexpression or a pre-specified ERBB2 mutation. Recommended dosing was P at an initial dose of 840 mg intravenously (IV) over 60 minutes (m), then 420 mg IV over 30-60 m every 3 weeks (wks), and T at an initial dose of 8 mg/kg IV over 90 m, then 6 mg/kg IV over 30-60 m every 3 wks until disease progression. Simon 2-stage design tested the null disease control (DC) - defined as partial (PR), complete response (CR) or stable disease at 16+ weeks (SD 16+) - rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage 1 have DC, 18 more pts are enrolled. If ≥7 of 28 pts have DC, the null DC rate is rejected. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Twenty-eight female pts were enrolled from August 2017 to November 2019; all pts were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. Demographics and outcomes are summarized in Table. Twenty-two pts had tumors with ERBB2 amplification (21) or overexpression (1); 4 tumors had ERBB2 mutations; 1 tumor had ERBB3 amplification; 1 tumor had both an ERBB2 amplification and mutation. Two PR and 7 SD16+ were observed in pts with ERBB2 amplification, and 1 SD16+ was observed in a pt with ERBB2 V8421 mutation only (no amplification) for DC and objective response (OR) rates of 37% (95% CI, 21% to 50%) and 7.1% (95% CI, 0.8% to 24%), respectively. One pt experienced grade 3 muscle weakness at least possibly related to P+T. Conclusions: P+T demonstrated evidence of anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated UC pts with ERBB2 amplification or certain mutations. Additional study is warranted to confirm the efficacy of P+T in this pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT02693535. [Table: see text]
Phase IIa study of BVAC-C in HPV type 16 or 18 positive recurrent cervical carcinoma.
Authors: Choi Chel Hun , Kim Byoung-Gie , Lee Jeong-Won , Bae Duk-Soo , Kang Eun-Suk , Kim Yong-Man , Kim Kidong , Kim Jae-Weon , Kim Young-Tae , Lim Myong Cheol , Oh Taegwon , Kang Chang-Yuil , Cho Duck , LEE JUNG-YUN , Kim Hee Seung
Published: June 2021

5512

Background: BVAC-C is a B cell- and monocyte-based immunotherapeutic vaccine transfected with recombinant HPV E6/E7, which was well tolerated in HPV positive recurrent cervical carcinoma in phase I study (J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 5;9(1):147). This phase IIa study sought to determine the antitumor activity of BVAC-C. Methods: Twenty-one patients with HPV 16 or 18 positive recurrent cervical cancer who had experienced recurrence after one prior platinum-based combination chemotherapy were enrolled. They were allocated to 3 arms; Arm 1, BVAC-C injection at 0, 4, 8 weeks (1x108 cells/dose); Arm 2, BVAC-C injection at 0, 4, 8, 12 weeks (5x107 cells/dose); Arm 3, BVAC-C injection at 0, 4, 8, 12 weeks (5x107 cells/dose) with topotecan at 2, 6, 10, 14 weeks (0.75 mg/m2 for 3 days). Results: The overall response rate was 21% (Arm 1: 29% (2/7), Arm 2: 25% (1/4), Arm 3 : 0 % (0/3)) among the evaluable patients (N = 14), and the median duration of response was 18 months (range, 9 – 26 months). The disease control rate was 43% (Arm 1: 29% (2/7), Arm 2: 50% (2/4), Arm 3 : 67 % (2/3)) and the median duration of stable disease were 12 months (range, 6 - 26 months). The median progression-free survival in all patients was 4 months (95% CI, 2 to Infinite months). Immune responses of patients after vaccination were shown to be correlated with clinical responses of them. Consistent with Phase I study, all evaluated patients showed not only inflammatory cytokine responses (IFN-γ or TNF-α), which might be mediated by the activation of natural killer cells and natural killer T cells, but also potent E6/E7-specific T cell responses upon vaccinations. Conclusions: BVAC-C demonstrated a durable antitumor activity with an immune response in HPV 16- or 18-positive recurrent cervical carcinoma patients who failed 1st line platinum based chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02866006.