Infodemics and Vaccine Confidence: Protocol for Social Listening and Insight Generation to Inform Action (Preprint)
Authors: Kolis Jessica , Brookmeyer Kathryn , Chuvileva Yulia , Voegeli Christopher , Juma Sarina , Ishizumi Atsuyoshi , Renfro Katy , Wilhelm Elisabeth , Tice Hannah , Fogarty Hannah , Kocer Irma , Helms Jordan , Verma Anisha 
Published: August 2023

BACKGROUND

In the fall of 2020, the COVID-19 infodemic began to affect public confidence in and demand for COVID-19 vaccines in the United States. While polls indicated <i>what</i> consumers felt regarding COVID-19 vaccines, they did not provide an understanding of <i>why</i> they felt that way or the social and informational influences that factored into vaccine confidence and uptake. It was essential for us to better understand how information ecosystems were affecting the confidence in and demand for COVID-19 vaccines in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established an Insights Unit within the COVID-19 Response’s Vaccine Task Force in January 2021 to assist the agency in acting more swiftly to address the questions, concerns, perceptions, and misinformation that appeared to be affecting uptake of COVID-19 vaccines. We established a novel methodology to rapidly detect and report on trends in vaccine confidence and demand to guide communication efforts and improve programmatic quality in near real time.

METHODS

We identified and assessed data sources for inclusion through an informal landscape analysis using a snowball method. Selected data sources provided an expansive look at the information ecosystem of the United States regarding COVID-19 vaccines. The CDC’s Vaccinate with Confidence framework and the World Health Organization’s behavioral and social drivers for vaccine decision-making framework were selected as guiding principles for interpreting generated insights and their impact. We used qualitative thematic analysis methods and a consensus-building approach to identify prevailing and emerging themes, assess their potential threat to vaccine confidence, and propose actions to increase confidence and demand.

RESULTS

As of August 2022, we have produced and distributed 34 reports to &gt;950 recipients within the CDC and externally. State and local health departments, nonprofit organizations, professional associations, and congressional committees have referenced and used the reports for learning about COVID-19 vaccine confidence and demand, developing communication strategies, and demonstrating how the CDC monitored and responded to misinformation. A survey of the reports’ end users found that nearly 75% (40/53) of respondents found them “very” or “extremely” relevant and 52% (32/61) used the reports to inform communication strategies. In addition, our methodology underwent continuous process improvement to increase the rigor of the research process, the validity of the findings, and the usability of the reports.

CONCLUSIONS

This methodology can serve as a diagnostic technique for rapidly identifying opportunities for public health interventions and prevention. As the methodology itself is adaptable, it could be leveraged and scaled for use in a variety of public health settings. Furthermore, it could be considered beyond acute public health crises to support adherence to guidance and recommendations and could be considered within routine monitoring and surveillance systems.