35 Implementation of a quality improvement initiative to reduce pain and anxiety associated with needle-related procedures in a Canadian paediatric emergency department
Authors: Poonai Naveen , Burke Karina , Brahmbhatt Shaily , Boisvert Leslie , Belisle Sheena , McKelvie Brianna , Patterson Kyna , Stevenson Alison , Eull Donna , Friedrichsdorf Stefan 
Published: October 2021

Primary Subject area

Emergency Medicine - Paediatric

Background

Needle-related procedures such as intravenous (IV) insertion, venipuncture, and lumbar puncture (LP) are commonly performed in children, particularly in the emergency department (ED). Children consistently rate these needle-related procedures as very distressing. While topical anesthetics have been shown to be highly effective and are available, they are inconsistently used. The Children’s Comfort Promise was originally developed at the Minnesota Children’s Hospital. It requires nursing staff to use four strategies for children undergoing needle-related procedures: (1) topical anesthetic, (2) sucrose or breastfeeding if ≤ 12 months, (3) Comfort positioning (swaddling, skin-to-skin, or facilitated tucking if ≤ 12 months and sitting upright for children &gt; 12 months), and (4) age-appropriate distraction.

Objectives

We sought to evaluate compliance with all 4 Comfort Promise strategies for managing children’s pain and anxiety during needle-related procedures in a Canadian paediatric ED.

Design/Methods

Implementation of The Comfort Promise in March 2020 included a focus group to perform a root cause analysis, designation of nurse champions, monthly steering committee and ED working group meetings, and didactic education sessions. Our institution’s decision support unit identified all encounters of children 0-17 years who underwent at least one needle-related procedure at our paediatric ED from January 1 to November 30, 2020. The outcome was compliance with all 4 Comfort Promise strategies. Balancing measures included adverse drug reactions and vasoconstriction. We used statistical process control to analyze the outcome from 2 months preceding and 7 months following implementation.

Results

From January 1 to November 30, 2020, 21,600 encounters were identified, of which 10,294/21,600 (47.7%) were female. Age ranged from 0-17 years with a mean (SD) of 6.9 (5.5) years. Needle-related procedures were performed in 730/21,600 (3.4%) encounters, most commonly IV insertion (289/730, 39.6%) and venipuncture for blood sampling (232/730, 31.8%). Half of all encounters had no compliance strategies electronically recorded (363/730, 49.7%). Compliance with all Comfort Promise strategies increased over the study period (Figure 1). Topical anesthetic increased from 3/35 (8.6%) to 35/83 (42.2%). Sucrose or breastfeeding increased from 0/6 (0%) to 2/16 (12.5%). Comfort positioning increased from 0/35 (0%) to 26/83 (31.3%). Distraction increased from 0/35 (0%) to 22/83 (26.5%). There were no adverse drug reactions or vasoconstriction.

Conclusion

Implementation of The Comfort Promise in a Canadian paediatric ED resulted in greater use of strategies, particularly topical anesthetic, to reduce needle-related distress in children. Ongoing compliance will depend on consistent electronic recording and provider education.