Abstract PO5-13-12: Personalized circulating tumor DNA testing for recurrence detection and treatment response monitoring in patients with metastatic invasive lobular carcinoma
Authors: Oesterreich Steffi , Tin Antony , Rivero-Hinojosa Samuel , Fielder Janie , Ferguson Jenifer , Kalashnikova Ekaterina , Rodriguez Angel , Liu Minetta , Lee Adrian 
Published: May 2024

Introduction

Metastatic invasive lobular carcinoma (mILC) presents unique challenges during treatment response monitoring. A higher frequency of metastases to the bone, gastrointestinal tract, uterus, meninges, ovary, and diffuse serosal involvement is observed in mILC. The challenge with mILC is that they can be difficult to detect clinically and radiographically, and consequently clinical progression can be difficult to determine with conventional imaging modalities like CT Scans, thus precluding many patients with mILC from enrolling into clinical trials. Therefore more accurate biomarkers are needed to better assess response to treatment in real time. In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of longitudinal ctDNA testing for treatment response monitoring in patients with mILC.

Methods

In this real-world study, longitudinal plasma samples (n=219) from 60 patients with mILC, treated across 52 independent clinics between 7/22/21 and 6/15/23, were analyzed. A personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay (SignateraTM bespoke, mPCR-NGS assay) was used for detection and quantification of ctDNA in plasma samples.

Results

In this cohort, the median patient age at diagnosis of metastatic disease (baseline) was 62.9 years (range: 32.2-79.7). Of the 60 patients, 41 (68%) had ER+PR+HER2-, 7 (12%) ER+PR-HER2-, 4 (7%) ER+PR+HER2+, 2 (3%) ER+PR-HER2+, 1 (2%) triple negative breast cancer; receptor status was not available for 5 (8%) patients.

CDH1 (75%) and PIK3CA (42%) were observed to be the top two genes with somatic, nonsynonymous mutations. Mutations in TP53 and TBX3 were observed in 13% of patients, mutations in AKAP9, IGFN1, RBM26, and RFC3 in 10% of patients, and mutations in ESR1 in 6.7% of patients. At variant level, PIK3CA p.H1047R (22%) and RBM26 p.Q701Tfs*23 (10%) were the top two somatic variants identified. The most common CDH1 variant, p.Q23*, was found in 5% of the cases.

Of the 60 patients, 37 (61.7%) were ctDNA-positive at all time points while on treatment (chemotherapy/endocrine therapy/targeted therapy) with the first time point collected at a median of 6.7 months (range: 2.5-2307 months) from baseline. Of these 37, imaging/biopsy results after baseline were available for 32 patients, 86% (27/32) of whom progressed. Thirty-two of 37 persistently ctDNA-positive patients had serial ctDNA measurements available, of which 14 (43%) had significant increase in ctDNA levels (average: 47-fold increase, standard deviation: 98) from first to last time points. At some point during their care ctDNA was detectable in all (n=51) patients with evidence of clinical progression.

Of the 60 patients, 14 (23.3%) were ctDNA-negative at all time points tested. None of the 14 persistently ctDNA-negative patients had evidence of disease recurrence or progression at the time of initial testing or throughout ctDNA monitoring. The first ctDNA time point was collected at a median of 33.1 months (range: 0.68-92 months) from baseline for these patients,a median of 3 time points was tested per patient (1-12).

Of the remaining 9/60 patients, 3 (33%) had sustained ctDNA clearance for a median of 46 days (range: 0-224 days) in response to treatment, and 2 (22%) were initially ctDNA-negative but turned positive 105 and 156 days later, indicating potential resistance to treatment and molecular progression. Additional 4/9 (44%) had ctDNA levels consistently low levels (average: 0.42 mean tumor molecules/mL) while on treatment for a median of 260 days (range: 217-442) and showed no evidence of progression.

Conclusions

ctDNA status and dynamics correlate well with clinical status of patients with mILC, as determined by conventional monitoring tools such as imaging and biopsy. Our results indicate that personalized, tumor-informed, longitudinal ctDNA testing may serve as a useful tool for detection of progression and monitoring treatment response in mILC patients.

Citation Format: Steffi Oesterreich, Antony Tin, Samuel Rivero-Hinojosa, Janie Fielder, Jenifer Ferguson, Ekaterina Kalashnikova, Angel Rodriguez, Minetta Liu, Adrian Lee. Personalized circulating tumor DNA testing for recurrence detection and treatment response monitoring in patients with metastatic invasive lobular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-13-12.