Abstract P4-17-02: Design, implementation and evaluation of a smoking cessation intervention for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery
Authors: Nolan M , Ghosh K , Warner DO 
Published: March 2017

Introduction:

Smoking is a risk factor for poor outcomes following breast reconstructive surgery, including wound dehiscence and infection. Women who would choose to have reconstructive surgery after mastectomy for breast cancer are unable to do so if they have not quit smoking. The specific aims of this project are to 1) design and implement an intervention to assist these patients in quitting and 2) evaluate its efficacy.

Methods:

Baseline data regarding current practices was collected via a chart review of 75 smoking breast cancer surgery patients from 1/1/2012-12/31/13. Charts were analyzed for documentation of smoking status, quit advice, resources provided and used, and smoking status at follow-up. Formative research informed the design of an Ask-Advise-Refer intervention for all new breast cancer patients seen at Mayo Clinic.

Intervention Design:

Smoking patients were identified prior to their initial Breast Cancer evaluation at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, during a standard intake call. Smoking status was documented by the rooming assistant to alert the physicians of smoking status, and physicians asked these patients about their smoking behavior, discussed the risks of smoking both for surgical procedures and breast cancer, and offered a Nicotine Dependence Consultation with a tobacco treatment specialist in an “opt-out” strategy that emphasized the importance of smoking cessation as part of the breast cancer treatment process. The advice and referral was documented in the medical record. Evaluation of the intervention was performed via a chart review of patients seen after one year of implementation.

Intervention Evaluation Results:

Breast clinic physicians documented smoking status in all patients seen after implementation. Referral to the Nicotine Dependence Center for cessation counseling increased from 29% (22/75) to 74% (20/27). Among those referred, attendance at the consultation increased from 41% (9/22) to 75% (15/20), suggesting stronger provider encouragement of cessation services. 30-day abstinence rates for those who attended a consult prior to 5/1/16 were 46% (6/13), which is consistent with baseline data.

Conclusions:

An Ask-Advise-Refer intervention for new breast cancer patients seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, who report current smoking, has been associated with higher rates of provider counseling on tobacco dependence, referral to available services, and patient attendance at referrals. Attending a referral greatly increases a patient's chances of quitting smoking for at least 30 days compared to average spontaneous quit rates in this population. This model is low-cost, time-efficient for providers, and applicable to most practice settings. Finding ways to make this intervention self-sustaining and applicable to multiple other practices could greatly improve our patient's health outcomes.

Citation Format: Nolan M, Ghosh K, Warner DO. Design, implementation and evaluation of a smoking cessation intervention for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-17-02.