The association between steroid use and recurrent venous thromboembolism: from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2
Authors: Nishikawa R N , Yamashita Y Y , Chatani R C , Kaneda K K , Nishimoto Y N , Ikeda N I , Kobayashi Y K , Ikeda S I , Kim K K , Takase T T , Tsuji S T , Oi M O , Takada T T , Otsui K O , Ono K O 
Published: October 2024

Background

It is well known that use of oral steroids is a risk factor for development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the impact of use of oral steroids on VTE recurrence has not been fully evaluated in the era of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), which has been a clinically relevant issue in the decision-making of anticoagulation strategies for patients who need oral steroids after VTE diagnosis.

Purpose

We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes in VTE patients treated with oral steroids after VTE diagnosis in the DOAC era.

Methods

The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry enrolling 5,197 consecutive acute symptomatic VTE patients among 31 centers in Japan between January 2015 and August 2020. The current study population were divided into 2 groups according to the use of oral steroids after VTE diagnosis; the steroid group and the non-steroid group. We compared clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes including recurrent VTE, major bleeding and all-cause death, between the 2 groups.

Results

Patients with steroids and those without accounted for 693 (13%) and 4,504 (87%), respectively. Patients with steroids more often had chronic kidney disease (29% vs. 18%, P&lt;0.001), autoimmune disease (50% vs. 5.4%, P&lt;0.001), thrombocytopenia (7.7% vs 4.9%, P=0.002), and anemia (64.4% vs 54.1%, P&lt;0.001), whereas there was no significant difference in the mean age (68.5 vs. 67.6 years old, P=0.16), the prevalence of women (62% vs 58%, P=0.06), active cancer (30% vs. 29%, P=0.42), and history of VTE (8.4% vs 6.8%, P=0.12) between the 2 groups. The cumulative 5-year incidence of discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy were not significantly different between the 2 groups (61.5% vs. 58.5%, log-rank P=0.16). The cumulative 5-year incidences of recurrent VTE nor major bleeding were not significantly different between the 2 groups (10.4% vs. 9.4%, log-rank P=0.55; 16.9% vs. 13.3%, log-rank P=0.16, respectively). Even after adjusting confounders, the risks of recurrent VTE nor major bleeding were not significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.65-1.45, P = 0.89; adjusted hazard ratio = 1.12, 95% confidence interval = 0.84-1.50, P = 0.44). The cumulative 5-year incidences of all-cause death was significantly different between the 2 groups (44.2% vs. 30.2%, log-rank P&lt;0.001). Even after adjusting confounders, the risk of all-cause death remained significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.82, 95% confidence interval = 1.56-2.12, P&lt;0.001).

Conclusions

Use of oral steroids after VTE diagnosis was not significantly associated with an increased risk of VTE recurrence in the DOAC Era, which might suggest that there could be no major concerns on an increased risk of recurrent VTE with oral steroids after VTE diagnosis under appropriate anticoagulation therapy.