Perception of Hearing Aid‐Processed Speech in Individuals with Late-Onset Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder
Authors: Mathai Jijo Pottackal , Appu Sabarish 
Published: July 2015

Background:Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is a form of sensorineural hearing loss, causing severe deficits in speech perception. The perceptual problems of individuals with ANSD were attributed to their temporal processing impairment rather than to reduced audibility.
This rendered their rehabilitation difficult using hearing aids. Although hearing aids can restore audibility, compression circuits in a hearing aid might distort the temporal modulations of speech, causing poor aided performance. Therefore, hearing aid settings that preserve the temporal
modulations of speech might be an effective way to improve speech perception in ANSD.Purpose:The purpose of the study was to investigate the perception of hearing aid‐processed speech in individuals with late-onset ANSD.Research Design:A repeated measures design was used
to study the effect of various compression time settings on speech perception and perceived quality.Study Sample:Seventeen individuals with late-onset ANSD within the age range of 20‐35 yr participated in the study.Data Collection and Analysis:The word recognition scores
(WRSs) and quality judgment of phonemically balanced words, processed using four different compression settings of a hearing aid (slow, medium, fast, and linear), were evaluated. The modulation spectra of hearing aid‐processed stimuli were estimated to probe the effect of amplification
on the temporal envelope of speech. Repeated measures analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni’s pairwise comparisons were used to analyze the word recognition performance and quality judgment.Results:The comparison between unprocessed and all four hearing aid‐processed
stimuli showed significantly higher perception using the former stimuli. Even though perception of words processed using slow compression time settings of the hearing aids were significantly higher than the fast one, their difference was only 4%. In addition, there were no significant differences
in perception between any other hearing aid‐processed stimuli. Analysis of the temporal envelope of hearing aid‐processed stimuli revealed minimal changes in the temporal envelope across the four hearing aid settings. In terms of quality, the highest number of individuals preferred
stimuli processed using slow compression time settings. Individuals who preferred medium ones followed this. However, none of the individuals preferred fast compression time settings. Analysis of quality judgment showed that slow, medium, and linear settings presented significantly higher
preference scores than the fast compression setting.Conclusions:Individuals with ANSD showed no marked difference in perception of speech that was processed using the four different hearing aid settings. However, significantly higher preference, in terms of quality, was found for stimuli
processed using slow, medium, and linear settings over the fast one. Therefore, whenever hearing aids are recommended for ANSD, those having slow compression time settings or linear amplification may be chosen over the fast (syllabic compression) one. In addition, WRSs obtained using hearing
aid‐processed stimuli were remarkably poorer than unprocessed stimuli. This shows that processing of speech through hearing aids might have caused a large reduction of performance in individuals with ANSD. However, further evaluation is needed using individually programmed hearing aids
rather than hearing aid‐processed stimuli.