The Effect of Pre-Biopsy Prostate MRI on the Congruency and Upgrading of Gleason Grade Groups Between Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy
Authors: Stapleton Peter , Milton Thomas , Sathianathen Niranjan , O’Callaghan Michael 
Published: December 2024

Introduction: Prostate biopsy results form the mainstay of patient care. However, there is often significant discordance between the biopsied histology and the ‘true’ histology shown on a radical prostatectomy (RP). Discordance in pathology can lead to the mismanagement of patients, potentially missing clinically significant cancer and delaying treatment. There have been many advancements to improve the concordance of pathology and more accurately counsel patients; most notably, the induction of pre-biopsy mpMRIs has become a gold standard to aid in triaging and identifying clinically significant cancers, and also to facilitate ‘targeted’ biopsies. Although there have been multiple reviews on MRI-targeted biopsies, upgrading remains an ongoing phenomenon. Aim: To assess the rates of prostate cancer upgrading and the clinical implication of upgrading on NCCN stratification. Methods: We conducted a retrospective audit of 2994 men with non-metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 who progressed to a radical prostatectomy within 1 year of diagnosis without alternative cancer treatment from the multi-institutional South Australia Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry. The study compared the histological grading between the biopsies and radical prostatectomies of men with prostate cancer and the varying rates of upgrading and downgrading for patients with and without a pre-biopsy MRI. Data were also obtain on suspected confounding variables; age, PSA, time to RP, T-stage at diagnosis and RP, number of cores, number of positive cores, prostate size, tumour volume and procedure type. The results were assessed through cross tabulation and uni- and multi-variate logistic regression while adjusting for confounders. Results: Upgrading occurred in (926) 30.9% of patients and downgrading in (458) 15.3% of patients. In total, 71% (410/579) of grade group 1 and 24.9% (289/1159) of grade group 2 were upgraded following a radical prostatectomy. By contrast, 33.4% (373/1118) of patients without prebiopsy MRI were upgraded at RP compared to 29.5% (553/1876) of the patients who received a pre-biopsy MRI. When analysed on a uni-variate level, the inclusion of a pre-biopsy MRI demonstrated a statically significant decrease in upgrading of the patient’s pathology and NCCN risk stratification (p = 0.026, OR 0.83, CI 0.71–0.98) (p = 0.049, OR 0.82, CI 0.64–1.01). However, when adjusted for confounders, the use of an MRI did not maintain a statistically significance. Conclusions: When considering the multiple variables associated with tumour upgrading, a pre-biopsy MRI did not show a statistically significant impact. However, upgrading of Gleason Grade Group following a prostatectomy is an ongoing phenomenon which can carry significant treatment implications and should remain a consideration with patients and clinicians when making decisions around treatment pathways. More research is still required to understand and improve biopsy grading to prevent further upgrading from affecting treatment choices.