Formation of pseudotachylitic breccias in the central uplifts of very large impact structures: Scaling the melt formation
Authors: MOHR‐WESTHEIDE Tanja , REIMOLD Wolf Uwe 
Published: March 2011

Abstract– The processes leading to formation of sometimes massive occurrences of pseudotachylitic breccia (PTB) in impact structures have been strongly debated for decades. Variably an origin of these pseudotachylite (friction melt)‐like breccias by (1) shearing (friction melting); (2) so‐called shock compression melting (with or without a shear component) immediately after shock propagation through the target; (3) decompression melting related to rapid uplift of crustal material due to central uplift formation; (4) combinations of these processes; or (5) intrusion of allochthonous impact melt from a coherent melt body has been advocated. Our investigations of these enigmatic breccias involve detailed multidisciplinary analysis of millimeter‐ to meter‐sized occurrences from the type location, the Vredefort Dome. This complex Archean to early Proterozoic terrane constitutes the central uplift of the originally >250 km diameter Vredefort impact structure in South Africa. Previously, results of microstructural and microchemical investigations have indicated that formation of very small veinlets involved local melting, likely during the early shock compression phase. However, for larger veins and networks it was so far not possible to isolate a specific melt‐forming mechanism. Macroscopic to microscopic evidence for friction melting is very limited, and so far chemical results have not directly supported PTB generation by intrusion of impact melt. On the other hand, evidence for filling of dilational sites with melt is abundant. Herein, we present a new approach to the mysterium of PTB formation based on volumetric melt breccia calculations. The foundation for this is the detailed analysis of a 1.5 × 3 × 0.04 m polished granite slab from a dimension‐stone quarry in the core of the Vredefort Dome. This slab contains a 37.5 dm3 breccia zone. The pure melt volume in 0.1 m3 PTB‐bearing granitic target rock outside of the several‐decimeter‐wide breccia zone in the granite slab was estimated at 5.2 dm3. This amount can be divided into 4.6 dm3 melt (88%), for which we have evidenced a limited material transport (at maximum, ≈20 cm) and 0.6 dm3 melt (12%) with, at most, grain‐scale material transport, which we consider in situ formed shock melt. The breccia zone itself contains about 10 dm3 of matrix (melt). Assuming melt exchange over 20 cm at the slab surface, between breccia zone and surrounding melt‐bearing host rock volume, the outer melt volume is calculated to contain the same amount of melt as contained by the massive breccia zone. Meso‐ and microscopic observations indicate melt transport is more prominent from larger into smaller melt occurrences. Thus, melt of the breccia zone could have provided the melt fill for all the small‐scale PTB veins in the surrounding target rock. Extrapolating this melt capacity calculation for 1 m3 PTB‐bearing host rock shows that a host rock volume of this dimension is able to take up some 52 dm3 melt. Scaling up 1000‐fold to the outcrop scale reveals that exchange between a host rock volume of 2 m radius around a 37 m3 breccia zone could involve some 10 m3 melt. These results demonstrate that large melt volumes (i.e., large breccia zones) can be derived, in principle, from local reservoirs. However, strong decompression would have to apply in order to exchange these considerable melt volumes, which would only be realistic during the decompression phase of impact cratering upon central uplift formation, or locally where compressive regimes acted during the subsequent down‐ and outward collapse of the central uplift.