Root canal therapy combined with endoscopic sinus surgery for odontogenic sinusitis: Efficacy comparison in a cohort study
Authors: Xiao Jun-Wen , Yu Ping , Zhao Zhang 
Published: November 2024

BACKGROUND

Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, often triggered by dental issues like periapical periodontitis, significantly contributes to chronic sinusitis, mainly affecting adults around 50 years old, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary diagnostic and treatment approach.

AIM

To investigate the therapeutic effect and clinical value of root canal therapy combined with nasal endoscopic surgery compared with simple root canal therapy in the treatment of severe odontogenic maxillary sinusitis caused by periapical periodontitis.

METHODS

The clinical data, diagnosis, and treatment of 200 patients with severe odontogenic maxillary sinusitis caused by periapical periodontitis from October 2020 to October 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 63 patients were treated with simple root canal therapy as the control group, and 137 patients were treated with root canal therapy combined with nasal endoscopic surgery as the observation group. The therapeutic effect, Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score, paranasal sinus Lund-Mackay score, complication rate, recurrence rate, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

First, we compared the effective rates: 23 cases were cured, 22 were improved, and 8 were ineffective in the control group, yielding a total effective rate of 84.90%. Meanwhile, 97 cases were cured, 34 improved, and 6 were ineffective in the observation group, resulting in a total effective rate of 95.62%. The observation group had a higher total effective rate compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Second, we compared the Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score. Before treatment, no significant difference (P > 0.05) was observed in this score between the two groups. After treatment, the Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score decreased in both groups. The Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score of the observation group at 3 and 6 mo after treatment was lower compared to that of the control group (P < 0.05). Third, we compared the Lund–Mackay score of paranasal sinuses. Before treatment, there was no significant difference in this score between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the Lund–Mackay scores of paranasal sinuses decreased in both groups. The Lund–Mackay scores of paranasal sinuses in the observation group at 3 and 6 mo after treatment were lower compared to those of the control group (P < 0.05). Fourth, we compared the incidence and recurrence rate of complications. Three months after treatment, no significant difference was found in the incidence and recurrence rate of complications between the observation group (6.56%) and the control group (9.52%) (P > 0.05). However, 6 mo after treatment, the incidence and recurrence rate of complications in the observation group (2.91%) was significantly higher compared to that of the control group (12.69%) (P < 0.05). Fifth, we compared patient satisfaction. Six months after treatment, the patient satisfaction of the observation group (93.43%) was significantly better than that of the control group (84.12%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Root canal therapy combined with nasal endoscopic surgery has a good therapeutic effect on severe odontogenic maxillary sinusitis caused by periapical periodontitis, and it can reduce the injury of maxillary sinus mucosa and bone, and significantly reduce the incidence of complications and recurrence rate. Meanwhile, it has high patient satisfaction and remarkable therapeutic effect, which is suggested to be popularized and applied in clinic.