14. Effects of an Opt-Out Protocol for Antibiotic De-escalation among Selected Patients with Suspected Sepsis: The DETOURS Trial
Authors: Moehring Rebekah W , Yarrington Michael E , Warren Bobby G , Lokhnygina Yuliya , Atkinson Erica , Bankston Allison , Coluccio Julia , David Michael Z , Davis Angelina , Davis Janice , Dionne Brandon , Dyer April , Jones Travis M , Klompas Michael , Kubiak David W , Marsalis John , Omorogbe Jacqueline , Orajaka Patricia , Parish Alice , Parker Todd , Pearson Jeffrey C , Pearson Tonya , Sarubbi Christina , Shaw Christian , Spivey Justin , Wolf Robert , Wrenn Rebekah , Ashley Elizabeth Dodds , Anderson Deverick J 
Published: December 2021

Background

Sepsis guidelines recommend daily review to de-escalate or stop antibiotics in appropriate patients. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (NCT03517007) of an opt-out protocol to decrease unnecessary antibiotics in selected patients with suspected sepsis.

Methods

We evaluated non-ICU adults remaining on broad-spectrum antibiotics with negative blood cultures at 48-96 hours at ten U.S. hospitals during September 2018-May 2020. A 23-item safety check excluded patients with ongoing signs of infection, concerning or inadequate microbiologic data, or high-risk conditions (Figure 1). Eligible patients were randomized to the opt-out protocol vs. usual care. The primary outcome was 30-day post-enrollment antibacterial days of therapy (DOT). Clinicians caring for intervention patients were contacted by a pharmacist or physician to encourage antibiotic discontinuation or de-escalation using opt-out language, discuss rationale for continuing antibiotics, working diagnosis, and de-escalation and duration plans. Hurdle models separately compared the odds of antibiotic continuation and DOT distributions among those who continued antibiotics.

Components of the De-Escalating Empiric Therapy: Opting-OUt of Rx in Selected patients with Suspected Sepsis (DETOURS) Trial Protocol

Results

Among 9606 screened, 767 (8%) were enrolled (Figure 2). Common reasons for exclusion were antibiotics given prior to blood culture (35%), positive culture from non-blood sites (26%), and increased oxygen requirement (21%). Intervention patients had 32% lower odds of antibiotic continuation (79% vs. 84%, OR 0.68, 95% confidence interval [0.47, 0.98]). DOT distributions among those who continued antibiotics were similar (ratio of means 1.06 [0.88-1.26], Figure 3). Fewer intervention patients were exposed to extended-spectrum agents (38% vs. 44%). Common reasons for continuing antibiotics were treatment of localized infection (76%) and belief that stopping antibiotics was not safe (31%). Safety outcomes such as mortality, readmission, sepsis relapse, C. difficile, and length of stay did not differ.

DETOURS Trial Flow Diagram

Flow of participants through the DETOURS Trial.

Observed Days of Antibiotic Therapy Among Intervention and Control Subjects in the DETOURS Trial

Post-enrollment days of antibiotic therapy among 767 DETOURS Trial participants in 10 US acute care hospitals within 30 days after enrollment. Dark pink color indicates percent overlap between intervention (purple) and control (light pink) groups.

Conclusion

In this patient-level randomized trial of a stewardship intervention, the opt-out de-escalation protocol targeting selected patients with suspected sepsis resulted in more antibiotic discontinuations but did not affect safety events.

Disclosures

Rebekah W. Moehring, MD, MPH, UpToDate, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, Author Royalties) Michael Z. David, MD PhD, GSK (Board Member) Michael Klompas, MD, MPH, UpToDate (Other Financial or Material Support, Chapter Author)