Implementation of a Virtual Interprofessional ICU Learning Collaborative: Successes, Challenges, and Initial Reactions From the Structured Team-Based Optimal Patient-Centered Care for Virus COVID-19 Collaborators
Authors: Zec Simon , Zorko Garbajs Nika , Dong Yue , Gajic Ognjen , Kordik Christina , Harmon Lori , Bogojevic Marija , Singh Romil , Sun Yuqiang , Bansal Vikas , Vu Linh , Cawcutt Kelly , Litell John M. , Redmond Sarah , Fitzpatrick Eleanor , Kooda Kirstin J. , Biehl Michelle , Dangayach Neha S. , Kaul Viren , Chae June M. , Leppin Aaron , Siuba Mathew , Kashyap Rahul , Walkey Allan J. , Niven Alexander S. ,   on behalf of the Structured Team-based Optimal Patient-Centered Care for Virus COVID-19 (STOP-VIRUS) Collaborative
Published: June 2023

IMPORTANCE:

Initial Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory illness Universal Study (VIRUS) Registry analysis suggested that improvements in critical care processes offered the greatest modifiable opportunity to improve critically ill COVID-19 patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES:

The Structured Team-based Optimal Patient-Centered Care for Virus COVID-19 ICU Collaborative was created to identify and speed implementation of best evidence based COVID-19 practices.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:

This 6-month project included volunteer interprofessional teams from VIRUS Registry sites, who received online training on the Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness and iNjury approach, a structured and systematic method for delivering evidence based critical care. Collaborators participated in weekly 1-hour videoconference sessions on high impact topics, monthly quality improvement (QI) coaching sessions, and received extensive additional resources for asynchronous learning.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:

Outcomes included learner engagement, satisfaction, and number of QI projects initiated by participating teams.

RESULTS:

Eleven of 13 initial sites participated in the Collaborative from March 2, 2021, to September 29, 2021. A total of 67 learners participated in the Collaborative, including 23 nurses, 22 physicians, 10 pharmacists, nine respiratory therapists, and three nonclinicians. Site attendance among the 11 sites in the 25 videoconference sessions ranged between 82% and 100%, with three sites providing at least one team member for 100% of sessions. The majority reported that topics matched their scope of practice (69%) and would highly recommend the program to colleagues (77%). A total of nine QI projects were initiated across three clinical domains and focused on improving adherence to established critical care practice bundles, reducing nosocomial complications, and strengthening patient- and family-centered care in the ICU. Major factors impacting successful Collaborative engagement included an engaged interprofessional team; an established culture of engagement; opportunities to benchmark performance and accelerate institutional innovation, networking, and acclaim; and ready access to data that could be leveraged for QI purposes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:

Use of a virtual platform to establish a learning collaborative to accelerate the identification, dissemination, and implementation of critical care best practices for COVID-19 is feasible. Our experience offers important lessons for future collaborative efforts focused on improving ICU processes of care.