bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025 huggingface dataset:
Tolerability of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 by treatment exposure in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A VISION study subgroup analysis.
Authors: Tagawa Scott T. , Armstrong Andrew J. , Krause Bernd J. , Herrmann Ken , Rahbar Kambiz , De Bono Johann S. , Adra Nabil , Desilvio Michelle , Messmann Richard , Holder Geoffrey , Chi Kim N.
Published: June 2022

5047

Background: In the phase 3 VISION study, lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617; 177Lu-PSMA-617) + protocol-permitted standard of care (SoC) improved clinical benefit and was generally well tolerated despite a higher rate of adverse events (AEs) than SoC alone. Here we assess AE incidence by exposure to 177Lu-PSMA-617. Methods: VISION was an international, open-label study of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in adults with PSMA-positive mCRPC previously treated with ≥ 1 androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and 1–2 taxane regimens. Patients received 177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks, ≤ 6 cycles) + SoC or SoC alone. rPFS and OS were primary endpoints; safety was a secondary endpoint. AE analysis by exposure to 177Lu-PSMA-617 was carried out in pre-specified subgroups. 177Lu-PSMA-617 cycle duration was generally ̃6 weeks and cycle 6 duration was until the earliest date of subsequent treatment, and date of last administration of randomized treatment (including SoC) + 30 days. The cycle of onset in which an AE first occurred in a patient at maximum grade was assessed. Results: The median duration of cycle of onset for cycles 1 to 5 was 6 weeks; for cycle 6, it was 26.6 weeks (Table). Of the 529 patients in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group, 240 (45.4%) received ≤ 4 cycles and 289 (54.6%) received 5–6 cycles of treatment. In patients who received ≤ 4 or 5–6 cycles, 234 (97.5%) and 285 (98.6%) treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs); 100 (41.7%) and 92 (31.8%) serious TEAEs; 205 (85.4%) and 246 (85.1%) treatment-related AEs; and 13 (5.4%) and 6 (2.1%) fatal TEAEs, respectively, were observed. Number of TEAEs and serious TEAEs by cycle of onset are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Over 50% of patients with mCRPC received 5–6 cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617. For cycles 1–5, TEAEs occurred at every cycle, with similar frequency. More TEAEs were observed in cycle 6, reflecting its longer median duration than other cycles. Clinical trial information: NCT03511664. [Table: see text]
Bone biomarkers and overall survival (OS) in men with advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC): Results from SWOG S1216, a phase III trial of ADT +/- orteronel.
Authors: Lara Primo "Lucky" N. , Mayerson Edward , Gertz Erik , Tangen Catherine , Goldkorn Amir , Van Loan Marta , Hussain Maha H. A. , Gupta Shilpa , Zhang Jingsong , Parikh Mamta , Twardowski Przemyslaw , Quinn David I. , Vogelzang Nicholas J. , Thompson Ian M , Agarwal Neeraj
Published: June 2022

5071

Background: Circulating bone biomarkers (BB) are strongly prognostic for OS in castration-resistant PC (CRPC). We prospectively evaluated BB in men with HSPC in S1216, a trial that established new OS benchmarks. We sought to identify patient (pt) subsets with differential OS outcomes as defined by BB. Methods: Markers of bone resorption [CTx;PYD] & formation [CICP;BAP] were assessed. Pts were randomly divided into training (1/3) & validation (2/3) sets. In the training set, recursive partitioning of OS was used to identify the ideal dichotomous cutpoint for each BB & for a combination of biomarker split points to define prognostic groups. In the validation set, Cox PH models were used to assess impact of BB on OS, adjusted for pt & tumor characteristics. Adjusted odds ratios for 3-year OS based on BB & baseline clinical factors were developed using logistic regression to estimate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Of 1,279 men, 949 had baseline BB. Median age–68y; median PSA-28 ng/dL; Gleason>7: 60%; Zubrod PS 0/1-97%. Values of BB at the median & at cutpoints maximized for OS were identified. For 3 of the BB, the cutpoint was at the ̃85th %ile; for PYD it was at the median. Recursive partitioning algorithms applied to the training set identified 4 groups with differential OS based on a dichotomous split of CTx in combination with additional CICP splits within each group. Hazard ratios (HR) for OS based on elevated BBs are shown. ROC analysis showed that only BAP & PYD had significantly higher AUC(0.73;0.74) compared to AUC of baseline clinical factors(0.71) w/ p=0.02 and 0.03 respectively. There was no evidence of BB x treatment interaction (all p>=0.2). Conclusions: In men initiating ADT for HSPC, elevated BB are strongly prognostic for worse OS. BB levels alone & in combination with pt/tumor characteristics identify unique subsets of men with high probability of being alive at 3 years from ADT initiation. These results validate the clinical value of BB in the HSPC state, extending BB utility beyond CRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT01809691. [Table: see text]
Prevalence of DNA damage repair (DDR) alterations in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) receiving enzalutamide (ENZA) or placebo (PBO) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): ARCHES post hoc analysis.
Authors: Azad Arun , Iguchi Taro , Alekseev Boris , Shore Neal D. , Sugg Jennifer , Haas Gabriel P. , Wozniak Michele , O'Brien Thomas , Laird Douglas , Stenzl Arnulf , Armstrong Andrew J.
Published: June 2022

5074

Background: DDR alterations are associated with poorer prognosis, including shorter overall survival (OS), in patients with mHSPC. In ARCHES (NCT02677896), patients with mHSPC treated with ENZA + ADT had a reduced risk of radiographic progression or death and improved OS versus PBO + ADT. This post hoc analysis assessed the prevalence of DDR alterations and associated baseline characteristics in patients with mHSPC in ARCHES. Methods: Patients with mHSPC (n=1150) were randomized 1:1 to ENZA (160 mg/day) + ADT or PBO + ADT. Germline DDR alteration testing was performed in blood using Ambry Genetics CustomNext-Cancer panel; 16 DDR-related genes were reported in the subset of patients who consented to participate in a pharmacogenomic study (n=664; Table). Descriptive analyses of baseline demographics and disease characteristics by DDR status were performed. Results: Of 664 patient samples tested, 652 were evaluable for analysis (ENZA + ADT, n=326; PBO + ADT, n=326). Baseline characteristics of these patients were similar to the ARCHES intent-to-treat population. The prevalence of DDR+ patients was lower than expected (n=34/652, 5.2%; Table). Of DDR+ patients, 13 (38.2%) had low-volume disease, compared with 228 (36.9%) of DDR− patients. High-volume disease was present in 21 (61.8%) DDR+ and 390 (63.1%) DDR− patients. Of DDR+ patients, 6 (17.6%) had localized disease at initial diagnosis (M0), compared with 145 (23.5%) DDR− patients. De novo metastatic disease at initial diagnosis (M1) was present in 28 (82.4%) DDR+ patients and 465 (75.2%) DDR− patients. Of DDR+ patients, 29 (85.3%) were from Europe, four (11.8%) were from North America, and one (2.9%) was from the Asia-Pacific region. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis found a lower prevalence of DDR alterations in patients with mHSPC in ARCHES, compared with the 7–12% previously reported in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Lozano et al. Br J Cancer 2021; Pritchard et al. N Engl J Med 2016). We did not identify differences in baseline disease characteristics based on DDR status. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896. [Table: see text]
Randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy plus abiraterone and apalutamide for patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer: Pathologic response and PSMA imaging correlates.
Authors: Bastos Diogo Assed , Coelho Rafael , Cardili Leonardo , Galiza Felipe , Ilario Eder Nisi , Viana Públio , Murta Claudio Bovolenta , Guglielmetti Giuliano , Cordeiro Mauricio , Pontes Jr Jose , Muniz David Queiroz Borges , Silva Jamile Almeida , Mota Jose Mauricio , Fialho de Freitas Guilherme , Leite Katia Ramos Moreira , Buchpiguel Carlos Alberto , Nahas William Carlos
Published: June 2022

5085

Background: Patients (pts) with high-risk localized prostate cancer (HRLPC) have a significant risk of disease recurrence and metastasis after radical prostatectomy (RP). Neoadjuvant therapy remains investigational but there may be a role for the next-generation androgen signaling inhibitors. We sought to evaluate pathologic and imaging response after the intense neoadjuvant approach. Methods: This is a phase II investigator-initiated randomized trial of 3-month neoadjuvant therapy with goserelin (androgen deprivation therapy, ADT) + abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP arm) or AAP + apalutamide (A-APA arm) before RP for pts with HRLPC (Gleason ≥ 8 and/or cT3N0-1 and/or PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL). The primary endpoint was the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) or minimal residual disease (MRD, tumor ≤ 0.5 cm). The secondary endpoints were safety, rate of residual cancer burden ≤0.25 cm3 (RCB = tumor volume x cellularity), Gallium 68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance correlates and rate of biochemical relapse (BR). Results: Sixty-two pts were randomized to A-APA (N = 31) or AAP (N = 31). Median age was 65 (range 47-77) years. NCCN risk groups included high-risk disease in 19%, very high-risk in 76% and regional (N1) disease in 5% (79% cT3, 65% Gleason 8-10, 57% PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL). Outcomes after intense neoadjuvant ADT are described in the Table. There was no statistically significant difference between study arms regarding pCR/MRD or RCB ≤ 0.25 cm3 rates. Patients with complete PSMA-PET response (psmaCR) demonstrated a RCB ≤ 0.25 cm3 rate of 50% compared to 7.5% in pts without a psmaCR ( P= 0.001). The rate of BR was 14% for pts with RCB ≤ 0.25 cm3 versus 38% in pts with RCB > 0.25 cm3 ( P= 0.118). At current median follow-up of 2.6 years, all patients with both psmaCR and RCB ≤ 0.25cm3 (N = 11, 18%) are free of BR. There were 2 grade (G) 5 adverse events (AEs) in the AAP arm (pulmonary embolism and sudden death, both after surgery). Nine (14.5%) pts (6 in A-APA; 3 in AAP) experienced G3-4 treatment-related AEs. The most common G3-4 AEs were hypertension (11.3%), AST/ALT elevations (3.2%) and skin rash (1.6%). Conclusions: No difference in pCR or MRD was observed between arms. Although pCR or MRD after intense neoadjuvant ADT was infrequent, a significant proportion of pts achieved a favorable pathologic response with RCB ≤ 0.25 cm3. PSMA-PET response is a potential surrogate for pathologic response. Clinical trial information: NCT02789878. [Table: see text]
Methylated DNA markers in urine aid in the selective identification of patients with prostate cancer as well as clinically significant pathology.
Authors: Shah Paras , Taylor William R. , Gysbers Brianna J. , Mahoney Douglas W. , Then Sara S. , Devens Mary E. , Foote Patrick H. , Doering Karen A. , Burger Kelli , Nikolai Brandon , Kaiser Michael W. , Allawi Hatim T. , Kisiel John B. , Gettman Matthew
Published: June 2022

5091

Background: Controversy surrounding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) highlights the need for non-invasive assays that better discriminate patients with and without clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Such distinction avoids overtreatment in patients with absent or indolent disease while capturing pathology that would derive benefit from intervention. We analyzed the presence of specific methylated DNA markers (MDMs) within urine samples of patients with biopsy proven PCa and assessed the ability to discriminate these patients from healthy controls with no clinical suspicion for PCa. Methods: 24 healthy volunteers with no clinical suspicion for PCa were age-matched to 24 patients with biopsy-confirmed disease across all Gleason scores. Urine collected from subjects was centrifuged with the cell-free supernatant analyzed in a blinded fashion for methylation signal within specific DNA sequences across 14 genes ( HES5, ZNF655, ITPRIPL1, MAX.chr3.193, SLCO3A1, CHST11, SERPINB9, WNT3A, KCNB2, GAS6, AKR1B1, MAX.chr3.727, GRASP, ST6GALNAC2) by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. A patient was considered to have a positive MDM panel if any individual marker exceeded the corresponding100% specificity cut-off value (overall MDM panel specificity of 100%). MDM panel positivity was used to evaluate the sensitivity for distinguishing patients with PCa (any Gleason score) from controls as well as discriminate csPCa cancers from PCa Gleason 6. Results: Median age of healthy controls and PCa patients was 70 years (IQR 67-72) and 65 years (IQR 61-71), respectively. Median PSA was 6.4 (IQR 4.9-9.0) among PCa patients, including median PSA of 5 (IQR 4.0-6.1) for Gleason 6, and 7.8 (IQR 5.1-9.2) for Gleason ≥7 disease. Gleason 6, Gleason 7, and Gleason 8+ cancer was noted in 8, 10, and 6 patients, respectively. Utilizing an overall specificity cut-off of 100% for discriminating normal controls from PCa cases across the MDM panel revealed an overall sensitivity of 83% (95% CI: 63-95%) for detection of PCa (6 of 8 Gleason 6, 9 of 10 Gleason 7, 5 of 6 Gleason 8+) and 88% (95% CI: 62-98%) for csPCa (Gleason ≥ 7). When considering a 100% specificity threshold for controls and Gleason 6 patients, the sensitivity the MDM panel was 69% (95% CI: 41-89%) for csPCa (6 of 10 Gleason 7, 5 of 6 Gleason 8+). Conclusions: We describe a panel of 14 MDMs within urine that offer high specificity and sensitivity for detection of prostate cancers as well as selective identification of clinically significant disease states. Prospective comparison between urine MDMs and PSA blood testing is necessary to discern the differential clinical impact of each screening methodology.
Molecular subtype to predict pathologic complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer in the I-SPY2 trial.
Authors: Thomas Alexandra , Clark Amy Sanders , Yau Christina , Wolf Denise M. , van 't Veer Laura , Douglas Emily H. , Chien Amy Jo , Huppert Laura Ann , Rugo Hope S. , Shatsky Rebecca Arielle , Isaacs Claudine , Berry Donald A. , Yee Douglas , DeMichele Angela , Esserman Laura ,   I-SPY2 Consortium
Published: June 2022

510

Background: HER2-positive breast cancer (bc) is a very heterogenous disease. We hypothesized that molecular subtype may predict disease response to investigational agents in HER2+ bc. Here, we report the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the first six agents tested in HER2+ bc in the I-SPY 2 trial for the full HER2+ cohort, by molecular subtype, and by disease receptor status. Methods: Women with HER2+ tumors which were > 2.5 cm were eligible. The I-SPY2 platform trial tests novel agents given neoadjuvantly with a backbone of taxol (T) and trastuzumab (H) followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Agents investigated in HER2+ bc were TH (control), MK2206, AMG386, pertuzumab (P), neratinib (N (given in place of H), and TDM1+P (given in place of TH). An investigational arm graduated if there was >85% chance of success compared to control in a 300-person phase 3 neoadjuvant trial. Further details of the I-SPY2 methods have been previously published. Molecular subtyping based on gene expression was utilized to categorize tumors into 5 response predictive subtypes (RPS) (HER2-/Immune-/DRD (DNA repair deficiency)-, HER2-/Immune+, HER2-/Immune-/DRD+, HER2+/Her2_or_Basal and HER2+/Luminal). Results: For the full HER2+ cohort (N=245) pCR rate was higher in all investigational arms than control (Table). By tumor receptor status, HER2+/HR- tumors (N=89) had a higher pCR rate than HER2+/HR+ tumors (N=156; 63% vs 37%, p = 0.0001). In HER2+/HR- tumors N, MK2206, P and TDM1/P graduated. In HER2+/HR+ tumors P and TDM1/P graduated. 76% (185/245) of I-SPY 2 HER2+ patients were classified as HER2+/Her2_or_Basal and 24% (60/245) were HER2+Luminal. pCR rate was significantly higher in the HER2+/Her2_or_Basal group than in the HER2+/Luminal group (57% vs 15%, p < 0.0001). All agents, except for MK2206, where numbers were small, showed greater efficacy in the HER2+/Her2_or_Basal group than in the HER2+/Luminal group. HER2+/Luminal appeared to be more sensitive to the AKT inhibitor MK2206 than to targeted HER2 agents, though numbers are small. Conclusions: pCR rates for patients with HER2+ bc treated with investigational agents, particularly dual HER2-blockade, were promising. Molecular response predictive subtype classification provides insight on how to better target therapy. The HER2+/Luminal group had low pCR rates with dual HER2-blockade but may have higher pCR rate with the addition of an AKT inhibitor and identifies a subgroup of HER2+ tumors in need of novel approaches. AKT inhibition for HER2/Luminal is being tested in I-SPY 2.2. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379. [Table: see text]
Estradiol (E2) levels in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) on ovarian function suppression (OFS) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa).
Authors: Tesch Megan Elizabeth , Zheng Yue , Rosenberg Shoshana M. , Poorvu Philip Daniel , Ruddy Kathryn Jean , Tamimi Rulla , Schapira Lidia , Peppercorn Jeffrey M. , Borges Virginia F. , Come Steven E. , Snow Craig , Partridge Ann H.
Published: June 2022

524

Background: OFS is an important treatment component for premenopausal women with early and advanced HR+ BC and optimal efficacy may depend on complete E2 suppression with GnRHa, especially when combined with aromatase inhibitors (AI). However, standard assays lack sensitivity and accuracy at very low E2 concentrations, rendering detection of breakthrough ovarian function challenging. More informative data regarding endocrine effects of GnRHa are needed, particularly in young women who derive the most benefit from OFS yet more frequently had breakthrough E2 levels in the SOFT trial substudy, SOFT-EST. Methods: Using a prospective cohort study of women with BC diagnosed at age ≤ 40 years, we identified participants with stage I-IV HR+ BC on OFS treatment with leuprolide, goserelin or triptorelin and blood collected 1 year after diagnosis. Clinical data were obtained through surveys and medical records. Plasma estrogens were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, with a limit of detection of 0.2 pg/mL compared to 10 pg/mL with standard assays. We assessed the proportion of women on OFS with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL (10 pmol/L) and > 10 pg/mL. Patient characteristics, estrone (E1) and FSH levels, and disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between those with and without elevated E2 using Fischer’s exact, Wilcoxon rank sum and log rank tests, respectively. Results: Of 84 patients who met inclusion criteria, 72 (86%) had stage I-III and 12 (14%) had stage IV BC; 25 were on OFS plus AI and 59 were on OFS plus tamoxifen (TAM). Median E2 was 3.1 pg/mL (range 0.2-30.9). 46 patients (55%) had E2 > 2.72 pg/mL, including 8 on AI and 38 on TAM; 4 (5%) had E2 > 10 pg/mL, including 1 on AI and 3 on TAM. Factors associated with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL were no prior chemotherapy, TAM and high E1 ( P ≤.05), but not age, BMI or GnRHa schedule (Table). After a median follow-up of 7 years, DFS events were seen in 6 patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL and 5 without ( P =.232); OS events were seen in 7 patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL and 5 without ( P =.608). Conclusions: More than half of young women with ER+ BC had E2 > 2.72 pg/mL on OFS, 91% of whom would not have been detected by standard assays. This may be an area amenable to intervention to improve outcomes in young women. However, larger studies are needed to elucidate the optimal E2 target on OFS and clinical implications of incomplete E2 suppression on ultrasensitive assays. [Table: see text]
Adherence to EndoPredict test scores for extended endocrine therapy management in the prospective EndoPredict Extended Endocrine Trial (EXET).
Authors: Brufsky Adam , Lenz Lauren , Pudusseri Anita , Wright David , Patel Kashyap B. , Clifford Brad T. , O'Connor Tracey L. , Strain Sasha , Kayali Fadi , Ratzel Sarah , Cummings Shelly , Kronenwett Ralf , Slavin Thomas Paul
Published: June 2022

537

Background: Current guidelines advise that individuals with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) undergo 5 years of endocrine therapy with consideration of up to 10 years of extended endocrine therapy (EET). The relative benefit of EET beyond 5 years is minimal for many patients, yet a significant group of patients at higher risk of late recurrence may benefit. EndoPredict is a gene expression assay to stratify those with high versus low BC recurrence risk and is validated to predict early and late distant metastasis up to 15 years using an EPclin score. In the prospective EXET study we evaluated adherence to EndoPredict test results when making decisions regarding EET. Methods: Patients with prior ER+, human epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HER2-) BC diagnosis and 4-6.5 years of endocrine therapy underwent EndoPredict testing. To evaluate the impact on decision making for EET, chart review was performed at or after test results were clinically disclosed. Univariable analysis was used for EPclin risk classification (high, low), multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the EPclin score with clinical variables and Firth logistic regression was used to assess the association of a given variable with the therapy decision. Results: The cohort consisted of 411 patients with an average age of 62 years (range 27, 90), 107 received adjuvant chemotherapy (26%), and 71 were lymph node positive (17.3%). The rate of EET was significantly different for those with low-risk scores (EPclin Score ≤ 3.3) compared to high-risk scores (EPclin Score > 3.3; OR 8.5×10-4 [95% CI 6.8×10-6, 6.0×10-3], p-value 5.7×10-68). All patients with high-risk scores received EET. Within the low-risk group, those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and those who were lymph node positive chose to extend endocrine therapy at higher rates. The EPclin score provided significant information in predicting EET status, even when accounting for clinical variables such as node status, tumor grade, age at diagnosis, adjuvant chemotherapy status and tumor stage (EPclin Score OR 20.2 [10.1, 44.0]; p-value=3.1 × 10-25). Conclusions: Even after adjusting for other clinical factors, EndoPredict is a significant predictor of clinical decision on EET. High adherence to EndoPredict test results in EET decision making was noted in our study. Clinical trial information: NCT04016935. [Table: see text]
Type of endocrine therapy and DFS in patients with early HER2+/HR+ BC: Analysis from the phase III randomized ShortHER trial.
Authors: Dieci Maria Vittoria , Bisagni Giancarlo , Brandes Alba Ariela , Frassoldati Antonio , Vicini Roberto , Balduzzi Sara , D'Amico Roberto , Conte Pier Franco , Guarneri Valentina
Published: June 2022

547

Background: Optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for HER2+/HR+ patients treated with chemotherapy and trastuzumab is still unclear. We evaluated the impact of the type of endocrine therapy on DFS in patients with HER2+/HR+ breast cancer enrolled in the phase III ShortHER trial. Methods: The Short-HER study randomized 1254 patients with HER2+ early breast cancer to receive 9 weeks vs 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab combined with anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy. The type of adjuvant endocrine was collected every 6 months during the first 5 years of follow-up and was classified as: aromatase inhibitor (AI), tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor (TAM-AI, in case of both drugs were administered for at least 1 year each), or tamoxifen (TAM). For premenopausal patients, the use of GnRH analogue was also collected. DFS was calculated from randomization to disease recurrence (locoregional or metastatic), second primary invasive cancer, or death. Results: 853 patients with HR+ BC (ER and/or PgR >10%) were included: 60% postmenopausal, 40% premenopausal. The pattern of endocrine therapy was: 55% AI, 22% TAM, 15% TAM-AI (8% missing data). Among premenopausal patients, 51% received GnRH. At a median follow up of 8.7 years (IQR 7.6-9.0), patients who received AI had a significantly better DFS as compared to patients who received TAM or TAM-AI: 7-yr DFS 87.3% vs 81.7%, log-rank P=0.017 (HR 1.46, 95%CI 1.05-2.03). In multivariate analysis including menopausal status, stage, and treatment arm, the type of endocrine therapy maintained a significant association with DFS (Table). In the subgroup of premenopausal patients, the use of GnRH was associated with numerically improved DFS: 86.6% vs 81.6%, log-rank P=0.168 (HR=0.70, 95%CI 0.43-1.16). Conclusions: In this post-hoc analysis of the ShortHER trial, adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitor was independently associated with improved DFS. Subgroup analysis in premenopausal patients suggests potential benefit with ovarian suppression. Clinical trial information: NCT00629278. [Table: see text]
Molecular diagnostics to reduce inequity in breast cancer diagnosis.
Authors: Adebamowo Clement Adebayo , Ezeome Emmanuel , Yawe King-David Terna , Ayandipo Omobolaji , Badejo Olawale , Adebamowo Sally Nneoma , Achusi Izu Ben , Fowotade Abike , Ogun Gabriel Olabiyi ,   AFBRECANE Research group is part of the H3Africa Consortium
Published: June 2022

548

Background: Modern management of breast cancer requires proper subtyping of the breast tumor to guide appropriate treatment and prognostication. However, there are barriers to availability of this resource in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) which contributes to global inequalities in breast cancer management and outcomes. The non-availability is due to high cost, and lack of personnel and infrastructure required for immunohistochemistry (IHC), the current gold standard for subtyping. IHC results are affected by pre-analytic and analytic handling and are subjective. Alternative methods that are more objective, cost less and require less infrastructure and skilled personnel will improve access and reduce disparities. Methods: In the AFBRECANE Project, we compared the results of ER and PR subtyping of 1,000 breast cancer tumors from patients recruited from 5 clinical sites in Nigeria using IHC and Cepheid GeneXpert RNA STRAT4 biomarker assay at ACCME Lab in Nigeria and University of Maryland. Results: For ER, the sensitivities, specificities, and agreement between IHC and STRAT4 ranged from 50.0%, 71.4% and 59.4% to 77.1%, 80.0% and 78.5% while for PR, they ranged from 58.1%, 66.7% and 62.5% to 84.6%, 84.2% and 84.4%. Conclusions: The wide range of sensitivities, specificities, and agreement between IHC and STRAT4 in this study confirms the challenges of molecular subtyping of breast cancer in LMICs like Nigeria. Sustainable objective methods are sorely needed to improve diagnosis, treatment and prognostication, and reduce global disparities.
Maintenance olaparib in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) by somatic (s) or germline (g) BRCA and other homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutation status: Overall survival (OS) results from the ORZORA study.
Authors: Pignata Sandro , Oza Amit M. , Hall Geoff , Pardo Beatriz , Madry Radoslaw , Cibula David , Klat Jaroslav , Montes Ana , Glasspool Rosalind , Colombo Nicoletta , Pete Imre , Herrero Ana , Romeo Marga , Ilieva Rumyana Nedyalkova , Timcheva Constanta , Di Maio Massimo , Barnicle Alan , Taylor Rosemary , Bashir Zahid , Clamp Andrew R.
Published: June 2022

5519

Background: In the SOLO2 (NCT01874353) trial, maintenance olaparib provided clinically meaningful improvement in OS for PSROC pts with a gBRCA mutation (m) compared with placebo (median 51.7 vs 38.8 months [mo], respectively). The ORZORA trial (NCT02476968) assessed efficacy and safety of maintenance olaparib in PSROC pts with a BRCAm (s or g) or a non-BRCA HRRm. Median progression-free survival (18.0 mo, BRCAm; 16.4, non-BRCA HRRm) was reported at primary data cutoff (DCO). We report final OS analyses. Methods: We conducted an open-label, single-arm, multicenter study of PSROC pts in response to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) after ≥2 prior lines of PBC. Pts underwent prospective central screening for tumor BRCAm status (myChoice CDx, Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.), then central gBRCAm testing (BRACAnalysis CDx, Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.) to determine s or g status. An exploratory cohort comprised of pts with predefined non-BRCA HRRm (FoundationOne CDx, Foundation Medicine, Inc.). Pts received maintenance olaparib (400 mg bid; capsules) until progression. OS and time to second progression (PFS2) were secondary endpoints. Results: 181 pts were enrolled (BRCAm n = 145 [s, n = 55; g, n = 87; s/g status unknown, n = 3]; non-BRCA HRRm, n = 33; unassigned, n = 3). At DCO (June 25, 2021), median OS follow-up in censored pts was 42.6 mo in BRCAm and 39.3 mo in non-BRCA HRRm pts. OS and PFS2 are reported in the Table. PBC was received as a subsequent therapy by 33.1% BRCAm, 32.7% sBRCAm, 33.3% gBRCAm, and 45.5% non-BRCA HRRm pts. 177 pts received ≥1 dose of olaparib and were included in safety analyses; 6.2% of pts discontinued because of adverse events (AEs). 37.9% of pts reported grade ≥3 AEs, the most common being anemia (16.4%). Since primary DCO, one new primary malignancy and four myelodysplastic syndrome events occurred. Conclusions: In final OS analyses, maintenance olaparib capsules showed consistent clinical activity in BRCAm and sBRCAm PSROC pts. Exploratory analyses suggest similar activity in non-BRCA HRRm pts. No new safety signals were observed. Findings highlight that PSROC pts, beyond those with a gBRCAm, can benefit from maintenance olaparib. Clinical trial information: NCT02476968. [Table: see text]
Low baseline vitamin D levels correlate with adverse pathological features and clinical outcomes among patients with breast cancer.
Authors: Barakat Dina , Mohamed Rehab , Elnaggar Maha , Tarik Dalia , Eid Samir-Shehata M.
Published: June 2022

552

Background: Serum vitamin D levels have been linked to breast cancer development; however, the impact on breast cancer features and outcomes remains unclear. The present study aimed at investigating the prognostic value of baseline vitamin D level among non-metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: In this study; we prospectively assessed female patients presenting to our department with non-metastatic breast cancer during the period from October 2018 to December 2019 for their baseline serum vitamin D levels measured by ELISA test before starting systemic therapy, in addition to other clinicopathological factors. Low Vit-D was defined as Vit-D level less than 30 ng /l. Chi-square test (Fisher’s exact test) was used to examine the relation between qualitative variables. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier method and comparison between two survival curves was done using log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was done using Cox-regression hazard model for the significant factors affecting survival on univariate analysis. Results: We enrolled 221 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer as they matched our eligibility criteria. Median age at diagnosis was (50.7± 10.9). About two thirds of the patients (64.7%) were post menopause. Median vitamin D level was (23.1 ng/l) with a range of (4-62.46 ng/liter). Around half of the patients (56.5%) had vitamin D level lower than 30 ng/liter, with higher numbers of low vitamin D levels among HER2 positive and triple negative (TNBC) patients compared to hormonal receptor positive (HR+ve) patients (P=<0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between vitamin D levels and tumor size, lymph node positivity and stage at diagnosis (the lower the vitamin D level, the larger the tumor size, and the higher the number of positive lymph nodes and the stage; r= -0.414, r= -0.586, r= -0.674; respectively; p<0.001). On follow up, the number of local recurrences, bone metastases and liver metastases were significantly higher among the low vitamin D level group, however; there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of development of brain and lung metastases. Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was significantly worse among the low vitamin D level group (p<0.001). Conclusions: Low serum vitamin D in breast cancer patients negatively correlates with tumor size, lymph node positivity and stage at diagnosis. It is linked to HER-2 positive and TNBC, and is significantly associated with worse DFS and OS.
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) versus intravenous chemotherapy in unresectable peritoneal metastases secondary to platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: Interim analysis of Indian randomized control trial.
Authors: Somashekhar S.P. , Kumar Rohit , Rauthan Amit , Patil Poonam , Kapoor Priya , Rakshit Susmita , Rajgopal Ashwin K.
Published: June 2022

5524

Background: PIPAC has emerged as a novel way to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy. PIPAC has shown improved response rate and quality of life in patients with inoperable peritoneal carcinomatosis. Methods: The trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry – India (CTRI) REF/2018/08/021223. Interim analysis is presented here. Primary endpoint was to assess the objective response rate (With RECIST 1.1) between PIPAC and IV chemotherapy arm. Secondary endpoints were to assess quality of life (QLQ C-30) and morbidity (CTCAE 4.0 and Clavien dindo) between the two groups. PIPAC was done with dose of cisplatin 15mg /m2 and doxorubicin at 3mg/m2. The choice of chemotherapy was left at the discretion of treating physician. The response rate (With MRI & Ca-125) & quality of life assessment (QLQ C-30) of both the group was done periodically and recorded. Results: 40 patients underwent 105 PIPAC applications with nearly 25 (62.5%) had 3 cycles completed. 40 patients underwent IV chemotherapy same time with nearly 23 (57.5%) having received atleast 5 cycles. Mean age 57.3±8.05, PCI 24.45±6.39, with nearly 45.5% of patients had previous surgery and 72.5% of patients having received atleast 2 lines of prior chemotherapy and nearly 60 % having ascites. The objective response rate is 66.6% versus 22.5%, grade 3-4 events were 10.0% vs. 35.7 % in PIPAC and IV arm respectively. Histological regression was seen in 67.5% of patients with 3 cycles PIPAC. Functional, symptom and global health score at day 120 was significantly better with PIPAC arm when compared to IV arm. Conclusions: PIPAC is safe and feasible for patients with unresectable platinum resistant ovarian cancer. PIPAC showed better objective response rates and improved quality of life when compared to chemotherapy arm with acceptable morbidity. Clinical trial information: REF/2018/08/021223.
Efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and gemcitabine dosed on day 1/day 8 versus day 1 alone for platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.
Authors: Lampert Erika Joelle , Rose Peter Graham , Chambers Laura , Yao Meng , Michener Chad , Debernardo Robert
Published: June 2022

5541

Background: Carboplatin, gemcitabine +/- bevacizumab is a preferred regimen for recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC). A phase III trial established that the regimen of carboplatin on Day 1 (D1) and gemcitabine on D1 and Day 8 (D8) was associated with acceptable toxicity and improved progression free survival (PFS) compared to carboplatin alone. Treatment with gemcitabine on D8 incurs more exposure to cytotoxic therapy and increased burden on patients and the healthcare system, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is unknown whether D1/D8 gemcitabine imparts an improvement in efficacy compared to D1 alone. Our objective was to compare efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and gemcitabine D1/D8 (CG-D1/8) with a modified D1 regimen (CG-D1). Methods: A retrospective single-institution cohort study was performed in women with recurrent PSOC treated with carboplatin, gemcitabine +/- bevacizumab from 2009-2020. Data was analyzed by intention to treat comparing women who received CG-D1/8 vs CG-D1. Data was also analyzed by 3 groups: CG-D1/8 vs CG-D1/8 but dropped D8 vs CG-D1. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), defined as complete or partial response at 6 cycles or maximum cycles if <6. Secondary outcomes included PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity, Neulasta use and dose reduction. Results: Of 200 patients, 26% completed CG-D1/D8, 21.5% started CG-D1/D8 but dropped D8, and 52.5% received CG-D1. There were no significant differences in age, race, or ECOG between cohorts. Among CG-D1/D8, 45.3% dropped D8 primarily due to neutropenia (51.2%) or thrombocytopenia (30.2%). The RR at 6 cycles was 68.7% for CG-D1/8 completed, 70.7% for CG-D1/8 dropped D8, and 69.3% for CG-D1 (p=0.97). The median PFS was 13.1, 12.1 and 12.4 months for CG-D1/8 completed, CG-D1/8 dropped D8, and CG-D1, respectively (p=0.29). Similarly, median OS was 28.2, 33.5 and 34.3 months for the above groups respectively (p=0.42). While there was no difference in concurrent bevacizumab use for CG-D1/8 and CG-D1 (34.7% vs 29.5%, p=0.43), among the CG-D1/8 patients, a significantly higher proportion of patients who dropped D8 received bevacizumab (51.2% vs 21.2%, p=0.006). Table 1 lists secondary outcomes. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in RR, PFS or OS among women with PSOC receiving CG-D1/8 vs CG-D1, regardless of whether D8 was dropped. CG-D1/8 was associated with significantly greater hematologic toxicity. These findings suggest a modified D1 regimen may be a suitable alternative to standard CG-D1/8 treatment and warrant prospective validation. [Table: see text]
Efficacy and safety of rucaparib maintenance treatment in patients from ARIEL3 with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma not associated with homologous recombination deficiency.
Authors: Coleman Robert L. , Oza Amit M. , Lorusso Domenica , Aghajanian Carol , Oaknin Ana , Dean Andrew , Colombo Nicoletta , Weberpals Johanne I , Clamp Andrew R. , Scambia Giovanni , Leary Alexandra , Holloway Robert W. , Amenedo Gancedo Margarita , Fong Peter C.C. , Goh Jeffrey C. , O'Malley David M. , Goble Sandra M. , Maloney Lara , Ledermann Jonathan A.
Published: June 2022

5544

Background: In ARIEL3 (NCT01968213), rucaparib maintenance treatment led to significant improvement vs placebo for the primary endpoint of investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma responsive to the last line of platinum therapy (Coleman et al. Lancet. 2017;390:1949–61). The largest benefit was observed in pts with carcinomas with a BRCA mutation or high loss of heterozygosity (LOH), a marker of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). However, rucaparib also improved PFS in pts with carcinomas negative by HRD test (ie, BRCA wild-type with low LOH), a subset of pts for which there is no identified molecular mechanism conferring PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Among these pts (rucaparib, n = 107; placebo, n = 54), median PFS was 6.7 vs 5.4 months, respectively (HR, 0.58 [95% CI 0.40–0.85]; P= 0.0049), and 31.8% vs 4.3% were progression-free at 1 yr. In this post hoc exploratory analysis, we further evaluated the efficacy of rucaparib maintenance vs placebo in this subset of pts. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to oral rucaparib (600 mg BID) or placebo. For this analysis, investigator-assessed PFS and safety were evaluated in pts with HRD-negative carcinoma, defined as BRCA wild-type with genomic LOH < 16% using Foundation Medicine’s T5 NGS assay. Results: Visit cutoff dates for efficacy and safety were Apr 15, 2017, and Dec 31, 2019. Across subgroups based on demographic or disease characteristics, the trend of rucaparib benefit vs placebo was consistently observed in pts with HRD-negative carcinoma (Table). The safety profile of rucaparib in the HRD-negative population was consistent with that of the overall safety population reported previously. Conclusions: Rucaparib maintenance reduced risk of progression in pts with ovarian carcinomas, including those not associated with HRD, regardless of clinical prognostic factors. [Table: see text]
Safety and efficacy of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome in patients with platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase Ib clinical trial.
Authors: Huang Yu , Li Rong , Guiling Li , Luo Yanlin , Yang Zhijun , Lou Ge , Ouyang Weiwei , Xie Rong , Luo Wuxia , Chen Lixin , Zhou Qi
Published: June 2022

5550

Background: Platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant ovarian cancer remains unmet medical need with an unfavorable prognosis. Its treatment options are limited and sequentially with multiple single-agent regimens or bevacizumab plus single-agent regimens are recommended. Mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome (PLM60) is the first approved mitoxantrone nano-drug, which has shown favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics with long circulation and high cumulation in tumor tissue, thus has a promising anti-tumor activity. This trial aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of PLM60 in patients with platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Methods: In this multi-center, open-label, single arm study, patients with histologically confirmed, epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma, either platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant, with at least one measurable lesion were recruited. PLM60 20 mg/m2 was administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles treatment or until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The primary endpoint was safety, adverse events were graded according to CTCAE 5.0. Second endpoint included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as per RECIST 1.1. Results: 47 eligible patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 35-67) were treated in 7 institutions in China, including 15 platinum-refractory patients and 32 platinum-resistant patients. 32 (68.1%) of 47 patients received at least 3 prior lines of therapy. Treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 45 (95.7%) of 47 patients, in which 31 (66.0%) were ≥ grade 3. The most common ≥ grade 3 TRAEs (incidence ≥10%) were leucopenia (51.1%), neutropenia (40.4%), anemia (19.1%), lymphocytopenia (17.0%) and thrombocytopenia (17.0%). At the cut-off data of October 31 2021, 39 patients were evaluable for response. ORR was 17.9% (7/39, 95% CI:7.5-33.5%, 7 PRs) and DCR was 56.4% (22/39, 95% CI:39.6-72.2%, 15 SDs). Among 21 platinum-resistant patients with ≥3 prior lines, the median DoR was 4.6 month, 2 responders had a DoR of > 6 months. The ORR and DCR of this cohort were 28.6% (6/21, 95% CI: 11.3-52.2%, 6 PRs) and 61.9% (13/21, 95% CI: 38.4-81.9%, 7 SDs), respectively. Median PFS was 3.6 month (95% CI 1.4-4.6), OS data was not mature. Objective response was not observed in platinum-refractory patients. Conclusions: PLM60 had an encouraging efficacy especially in platinum-resistant patients who had received at least 3 prior lines with tolerable safety profiles. Clinical trial information: NCT04718376.
Immune tumor microenvironnement (iTME) post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, beyond PD-L1: Novel immune targets in ovarian cancer, data from the CHIVA trial, a GINECO/GINEGEPS study.
Authors: Blanc-Durand Felix , Yaniz-Galende Elisa , Genestie Catherine , Gauthier De Saint Basile Hortense , Chardin Laure , De Rauglaudre Gaetan , Raban Nadia , Chevalier Annick , Ferron Gwenael , Kaminsky Marie-Christine , Ray-Coquard Isabelle Laure , Hamizi Salima , Combe Pierre , Abadie Lacourtoisie Sophie , Joly Florence , Meunier Jérome , Floquet Anne , Alexandre Jérôme , Le Formal Audrey , Leary Alexandra
Published: June 2022

5554

Background: Antibodies targeting PDL1 or PD1 have been disappointing so far in the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC). A greater understanding of the complex iTME and of the impact of chemotherapy on immune features could uncover promising immune targets. We previously reported that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) increased CD4+ and CD8+ immune cells (IC) and depleted FOXP3+ suppressive T-regs in OC iTME. Here we aimed to describe the expression of PDL1 as well as other co-regulatory molecules in OC and their changes under NACT. Methods: Tumor samples and clinical data were prospectively collected from patients (pts) in the randomized CHIVA trial of NACT +/- nintedanib. Samples were evaluable for immune profiling for 116-124 pts at diagnosis and 89-107 at surgery after 3 cycles of NACT. IC stained for CD4, CD8 were scored as number of IC+/mm². Expression of immune co-regulatory molecules PDL1, TIM3, LAG3 and IDO was scored as percentage of positive cells, and tumors were classified as PDL1/TIM3/IDO/LAG3 positive if > 1% of IC and/or tumor cells (TC) were positive. Highly sensitive pts, defined as objective response to NACT and prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS > 24months), were compared to refractory pts (progressing during or within 3mo of platinum). Results: As expected, about one third (36%) of tumors were PDL1+ at diagnosis. In contrast, the prevalence of other co-regulatory molecules was higher with 52%, 54% and 93% of tumors being positive for IDO, LAG3 and TIM3, respectively. There was no significant change in PDL1 expression with NACT. However, in paired samples NACT significantly increased IDO and LAG3 expression (p < 0.05), such that 60% and 66% of tumors post-NACT were positive for IDO and LAG3, respectively. TIM3 expression remained high post-NACT with 92% of positive tumors. Highly sensitive tumors (vs refractory tumors) had significantly higher IC expression of TIM3 after NACT (24% vs 6%, p = 0.005), and were significantly more infiltrated by CD4+ (441 vs 228 cells/mm2, p = 0.04) and CD8+ (460 vs 225 cells/mm2, p = 0.045) T cells. Conclusions: Other immune targets beyond PDL1 are highly expressed in OC. In addition NACT appears to prime the iTME by increasing effector T cell infiltration and the expression of other relevant co-regulatory molecules (LAG3, TIM3 and IDO). Future studies could be performed by priming the iTME with NACT and testing novel immune therapies based on target expression in samples obtained at interval debulking surgery.