Role of Combination Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease
Authors: Bhatt Deepak L. , Eikelboom John W. , Connolly Stuart J. , Steg P. Gabriel , Anand Sonia S. , Verma Subodh , Branch Kelley R.H. , Probstfield Jeffrey , Bosch Jackie , Shestakovska Olga , Szarek Michael , Maggioni Aldo Pietro , Widimský Petr , Avezum Alvaro , Diaz Rafael , Lewis Basil S. , Berkowitz Scott D. , Fox Keith A.A. , Ryden Lars , Yusuf Salim , Aboyans V. , Alings M. , Commerford P. , Cook-Bruns N. , Dagenais G. , Dans A. , Ertl G. , Felix C. , Guzik T. , Hart R. , Hori M. , Kakkar A. , Keltai K. , Keltai M. , Kim J. , Lamy A. , Lanas F. , Liang Y. , Liu L. , Lonn E. , Lopez-Jaramillo P. , Metsarinne K. , Moayyedi P. , O’Donnell M. , Parkhomenko A. , Piegas L. , Pogosova N. , Sharma M. , Stoerk S. , Tonkin A. , Torp-Pedersen C. , Varigos J. , Verhamme P. , Vinereanu D. , Yusoff K. , Zhu J. 
Published: March 2020

Background:

Patients with established coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease often have diabetes mellitus. These patients are at high risk of future vascular events.

Methods:

In a prespecified analysis of the COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies), we compared the effects of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg daily) versus placebo plus aspirin in patients with diabetes mellitus versus without diabetes mellitus in preventing major vascular events. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Secondary end points included all-cause mortality and all major vascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major adverse limb events, including amputation). The primary safety end point was a modification of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria for major bleeding.

Results:

There were 10 341 patients with diabetes mellitus and 17 054 without diabetes mellitus in the overall trial. A consistent and similar relative risk reduction was seen for benefit of rivaroxaban plus aspirin (n=9152) versus placebo plus aspirin (n=9126) in patients both with (n=6922) and without (n=11 356) diabetes mellitus for the primary efficacy end point (hazard ratio, 0.74,
P
=0.002; and hazard ratio, 0.77,
P
=0.005, respectively,
P
interaction
=0.77) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81,
P
=0.05; and hazard ratio, 0.84,
P
=0.09, respectively;
P
interaction
=0.82). However, although the absolute risk reductions appeared numerically larger in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus, both subgroups derived similar benefit (2.3% versus 1.4% for the primary efficacy end point at 3 years, Gail-Simon qualitative
P
interaction
<0.0001; 1.9% versus 0.6% for all-cause mortality,
P
interaction
=0.02; 2.7% versus 1.7% for major vascular events,
P
interaction
<0.0001). Because the bleeding hazards were similar among patients with and without diabetes mellitus, the prespecified net benefit for rivaroxaban appeared particularly favorable in the patients with diabetes mellitus (2.7% versus 1.0%; Gail-Simon qualitative
P
interaction
=0.001).

Conclusions:

In stable atherosclerosis, the combination of aspirin plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily provided a similar relative degree of benefit on coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral end points in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Given their higher baseline risk, the absolute benefits appeared larger in those with diabetes mellitus, including a 3-fold greater reduction in all-cause mortality.

Registration:

URL:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov
; Unique identifier: NCT01776424.