Risk Assessment of the Pesticide Coragen 20 SC with the Active Substance Chlorantraniliprole
Authors: Sverdrup Line Emilie , Bjørge Christine , Eklo Ole Martin , Grung Merete , Källqvist Torsten , Klingen Ingeborg , Låg Marit , Rivedal Edgar , Ropstad Erik , Øvrebø Steinar 
Published: June 2022

Coragen 20 SC is a new product in Norway containing the active substance chlorantraniliprole. It is applied for use in apples against codling moth (Cydia pomonella), apple fruit moth (Argyresthia conjugella) and free leaf living larvae. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) was asked by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority to perform a risk assessment on human health, environmental fate and ecotoxicological of the active substance and the product. The risk assessment of the product was approved at a meeting 11th of May 2010 by VKMs Scientific Panel on Pesticides (Panel 2). VKMs Panel 2 concludes as following: The product and the active substance have low acute oral, dermal and inhalation toxicities. Both are non-irritating to the skin, and no allergenic potential by skin contact were shown. Coragen was non-irritating to the eyes, while chlorantraniliprole showed a weak irritating potential.  Chlorantraniliprole is not shown to have any genotoxic or carcinogenic potential, or to be teratogenic or toxic to the reproduction of female animals. The potential for testicular toxicity of chlorantraniliprole is unclear because the study design and the limited number of young dogs (2/sex/group) do not provide basis for a firm conclusion.  No particular target organ for toxicity in any species in the sub-chronic and chronic toxicity studies was seen. The observed dose- and time dependent increased degree of microvesiculation in the zona fasiculata of the adrenal cortex in male rats, is however of uncertain biological significance. All test species (rat, mice, dog) showed physiological adaption to chlorantraniliprole administration (increased liver metabolism with induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes) which was manifested as increased liver weight and hepatocellular hypertrophy. In the chronic toxicity study in mice, the increased liver weight and hepatocellular hypertophy was accompanied with eosinofilic foci, which was assessed as an adverse effect. The no observed effect level (NOAEL) derived from this study serves as basis for calculations of values for acceptable daily intake (ADI) and acceptable operator exposure level (AOEL). 

In Panel 2‘s opinion a sub-chronic study (90 days) with the technical material (E2Y45-282) including relevant concentration of the impurity IN-G2S78 should be performed. This would bring information on possible influence of the impurity on the toxicological profile of the technical material, and consequently on the assessment of the NOAELs in the various toxic studies. 

The estimated risk for operator and for bystanders or for workers re-entering treated crops is assessed as minimal.  

Chlorantraniliprole is persistent in soil with half live of about 1 year. The long half life indicates high potential for accumulation in soil after repeated use, which is confirmed by both model simulations and field studies. The Panel considers field data from the south of Europe not to be relevant for the Nordic conditions based on different climate conditions and soil properties contributing in different directions.

 The Panel considers that the existing documentation is not sufficient for a firm conclusion on the use of normalised field data for modelling purposes. However, the substance is persistent and expected to accumulate in soil. The Panel concludes that there is minimal risk for toxic effects on mammals, birds, bees, and microorganisms in soil due to chlorantraniliprole exposure with the proposed exposure regime. Panel concludes that there is “very high risk” for effects on in-field non target arthropods from chlorantraniliprole exposure.   

For soil living invertebrates, earthworms seem rather insensitive to chlorantraniliprole and the Panel considers the toxic effects to be minimal. Panel considers the risk for toxic effects on soil living arthropods to be high. Crustaceans and insects larvae are the aquatic organisms most sensitive to chlorantraniliprole.  The Panel concludes that there is a minimal risk of toxic effects on aquatic organisms due to exposure to chlorantraniliprole with the proposed application regime provided that a buffer zone of 30 m to surface water is applied.