Implementing a Health Care Professional–Supported Digital Intervention for Survivors of Cancer in Primary Care: Qualitative Process Evaluation of the Renewed Intervention (Preprint)
Authors: Smith Jazzine , Essery Rosie , Yardley Lucy , Richardson Alison , Slodkowska-Barabasz Joanna , Foster Claire , Watson Eila , Grimmett Chloe , Geraghty Adam W A , Little Paul , Bradbury Katherine 
Published: April 2022

BACKGROUND

Primary care plays an important role in supporting survivors of cancer; however, support is limited because of practitioners’ perceived lack of expertise and time. A digital intervention for survivors of cancer could provide an efficient way for primary care staff to support survivors of cancer without the need to accumulate expertise and skills to help patients make behavior changes; providing very brief support alongside this could maximize adherence to digital interventions. <i>Renewed</i> is a digital intervention that combines web-based behavior change advice with brief health care practitioner support from a nurse or health care assistant. Knowledge about the views and experiences of primary care staff providing support alongside a digital intervention for survivors of cancer is sparse, limiting the understanding of the acceptability and feasibility of this type of intervention.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore supporters’ experiences of providing support to survivors of cancer using <i>Renewed</i>, understand potential barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of <i>Renewed</i> in practice, and investigate the strengths and weaknesses of the intervention from the perspective of health care professionals.

METHODS

This was a qualitative process evaluation nested within a large trial evaluating <i>Renewed</i>. A total of 28 semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with nurses and health care assistants. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes were developed during the analysis, which reflected the factors that supporters identified as hindering or enabling them to provide support alongside <i>Renewed Online</i>: <i>Renewed Online</i> as an acceptable digital tool with some improvements, confidence in enacting the supporter role, practicalities of delivering support alongside a digital intervention, and managing a patient-led approach. The analysis suggests that supporters perceived that a digital intervention such as <i>Renewed</i> would be beneficial in supporting survivors of cancer in primary care and fit within current practices. However, barriers to providing support alongside the intervention were also identified, including concerns about how to facilitate rapport building and, in a minority, concerns about using a nondirective approach, in which most advice and support is provided through digital interventions, with brief additional support provided by primary care staff.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings add to the literature on how best to provide support alongside digital interventions, suggesting that although most practitioners cope well with a nondirective approach, a minority requires more training to feel confident in implementing this. This study suggests that the barriers to providing formal support to survivors of cancer in primary care could be successfully overcome with an approach such as <i>Renewed</i>, where a digital intervention provides most of the support and expertise, and health care practitioners provide additional brief human support to maximize engagement. Strategies to maximize the chances of successful implementation for this type of intervention are also discussed.