A vegetation‐based method to map climatic variation in the arctic–boreal transition area of Finnmark, north‐easternmost Norway
Authors: Karlsen Stein Rune , Elvebakk Arve , Johansen Bernt 
Published: June 2005

Aim To develop a new method for bioclimate mapping where the vegetation layer is the main source of climate information.

Location The study area includes four subareas, all situated on the Varangerhalvøya peninsula in Finnmark, north‐easternmost Norway (70–71° N). The four subareas were chosen to represent most of the climatic, topographic, geomorphologic and botanic diversity along the arctic–boreal gradient in the area. The four meteorological stations in the area show a climatic gradient with mean July temperature ranging from 10.1 to 12.3 °C.

Methods The new vegetation‐based method is based on the fact that most plant species and plant communities both in the Arctic and adjacent areas have a distribution pattern limited by temperature to some extent. The vegetation is mapped using Landsat TM data and a contextual correction process in a geographic information system. The mapped vegetation units are defined as temperature indicators based on their total distribution patterns and the temperature indicator value of their high frequency and dominant species. The indicator value and degree of cover of all thermophilous vegetation units, within each 500 × 500 m study unit, are combined in a Vegetation‐based Index of Thermophily,VItm. This new vegetation‐based method is based on the same basic idea as a recently published floristic‐based method for calculating a Floristic‐based Index of Thermophily,FItm. TheVItmvalues are tested by comparison with theFItmvalues, and temperature data collected in the field during two growing seasons, and the differences are interpreted ecologically.

Results Twenty‐one of the mapped vegetation units were defined as thermophilous and categorized in five groups of temperature indicators. TheVItmvalues showed a strong positive linear relationship with the temperatures measured during the years 2001 and 2002, withr2values of 0.79 and 0.85, respectively. TheVItmvalues show a high linear relationship (r2 = 0.76) with the 71 study units where theFItmvalues were calculated. As interpreted from the relationship with temperature measurements andFItmvalues, the vegetation‐based method seems to work at a broad range of ecological conditions, with very dry, acidic sites being the most important exception. TheVItmvalues are related to growing degree‐days of a normal year, and the four subareas are mapped, showing a diversity of 13 bioclimatic classes. The birch forest line is estimated to occur at about 980 °C‐days. The results show climatic gradients with temperatures increasing from the cold coast towards the interior, from wind‐exposed convex hills towards wind‐protected valleys, and from mountain plateaux towards south‐facing lowlands. The north‐easternmost study site at the coast is positioned within the arctic shrub tundra zone.

Main conclusions The vegetation‐based method shows a strong positive correlation both with measured temperatures and the floristic‐based method within a broad range of different ecological conditions. The vegetation‐based method has the potential for bioclimatic mapping of large areas in a cost‐effective way. The floristic‐based method has higher accuracy and is more flexible than the vegetation‐based method, and the two methods seem to complement each other.