P-214 Direct unequal cleavage-1 (DUC1) in IVF/ICSI cycles: relationship with patient characteristics and insemination method
Authors: Bartoli E , Vitali M , Moutier C , Lain M , Guglielmo M  C , Mignini Renzini M , Buratini J , Dal Canto M 
Published: July 2024

Study question

Does the incidence of DUC1 in IVF/ICSI cycles vary with the maternal profile and insemination method?

Summary answer

The incidence of DUC1 cycles is higher in patients with a more favourable prognosis. DUC1 embryos are more frequent in ICSI than in IVF cycles.

What is known already

The emergence of Time-Lapse Microscopy (TLM) has enabled a dynamic and thorough evaluation of in vitro embryo development, unveiling the occurrence of morphological phenomena unobserved with static observation, such as direct unequal cleavage (DUC), which is associated with a drastically reduced competence to implant. The incidence of DUC-1 (DUC immediately after syngamy) has been reported to vary from 8.3% to 26%, but the reasons underlying its occurrence and variability are unknown. There is evidence that the maternal profile and insemination method can impact embryo developmental competence, but whether they impact the incidence of DUC is also unknown.

Study design, size, duration

The study includes 2920 first IVF/ICSI cycles (2018 to 2022) providing 12492 embryos. Cycles presenting male infertility were excluded from the analysis. The percentages of DUC1 embryos in relation to total embryos and of cycles providing at least one DUC1 embryo in relation to total cycles were compared between AMA (advanced maternal age; ≥35) and pre-AMA (&lt;35) cycles. Patient/cycle characteristics were compared between cycles with and without DUC1 occurrence in AMA and pre-AMA cycles, separately.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Ovarian stimulation was induced with rFSH or with a combination of FSH and LH using classic antagonist or short agonist protocols. Oocytes were inseminated with either IVF or ICSI standard methodology. Embryo culture was performed in an integrated embryo culture Time-lapse System (EmbryoScope; Vitrolife). Differences between percentages were assessed by the Fisher’s exact test, while differences between continuous variables were assessed with the Wilcoxon sum rank test.

Main results and the role of chance

The percentage of DUC1 embryos in relation to total embryos did not vary between pre-AMA (5.4%) and AMA (5.2%; p &gt; 0.05) cycles. Alternatively, the incidence of cycles providing at least one DUC1 embryo was higher in pre-AMA (21.7%) as compared with AMA patients (16.0%; p &lt; 0.0001). In both pre-AMA and AMA cycles, DUC1 occurrence was associated with higher oocyte yield (13.5±7.7 vs. 10.6±6.7 and 11.0±6.3 vs. 7.5±5.5, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001), higher AMH serum levels (4.4±4.7 vs. 3.4±3.2 and 3.0±3.6 vs. 2.1±2.1ng/mL, respectively; p &lt; 0.004) and lower basal FSH serum levels (7.0±2.1 vs. 7.6±2.9 and 7.8±3.3 vs. 8.5±3.4mU/mL, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001). Overall, the percentage of DUC1 embryos was higher in ICSI (5.6%) as compared to IVF (4.4%, p &lt; 0.01) cycles. However, when the data was stratified by maternal age, DUC1 incidence was significantly higher in ICSI vs. IVF in AMA (5.6 vs 4.0%; p = 0.002) but not in pre-AMA (5.7 vs 5.0%; p = 0.19). All 21 DUC1 embryos transferred during the study failed to implant.

Limitations, reasons for caution

Our study is limited by its retrospective nature. The present conclusions must be confirmed in other patient populations with different race/genetics and habits.

Wider implications of the findings

The occurrence of cycles providing DUC1 embryos is paradoxically associated with a more favourable patient prognosis, and the percentage of DUC1 embryos is higher in ICSI as compared to IVF cycles in AMA patients. Our findings represent new valuable clues for the clarification of DUC1 underlying causes.

Trial registration number

NA