Abstract 1798: A detailed comparison between second-generation AR antagonists reveals differences in the overall impact on gene regulation patterns in prostate cancer cells
Authors: Baumgart Simon J. , Nevedomskaya Ekaterina , Lesche Ralf , Seidel Henrik , Haendler Bernard 
Published: August 2018

Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is essential at all prostate cancer stages and is clinically addressed by surgical or chemical castration, AR antagonists and androgen synthesis inhibitors. Second-generation AR antagonists include the approved drug enzalutamide and the late-stage clinical investigational oral compounds apalutamide and darolutamide. Comparing the gene expression patterns and the overarching epigenetic modifications elicited by AR antagonists will be essential for a detailed understanding of the molecular mode of action of these compounds.

Methods: The transcriptome and AR binding patterns were analyzed by RNA-seq and qPCR, respectively. Genome-wide changes of the active transcription histone modification H3K27 acetylation were determined by ChIP-seq.

Results: RNA-seq was performed in the androgen-dependent VCaP and LNCaP cell lines for a detailed analysis of the genome-wide transcriptional effects of the AR antagonists darolutamide, enzalutamide and apalutamide. Gene set enrichment analysis indicated that many genes involved in androgen response were up- or down-regulated by androgen treatment with R1881. Principal component analysis showed that treatment with pharmacologically relevant doses of AR antagonists had similar effects at the 8-hour time point, however some differences were visible at the 22-hour time point. A strong expression down-regulation of a number of genes from the Wnt and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathways was observed for darolutamide as compared to enzalutamide and apalutamide treatment in the VCaP cell line. In LNCaP cells the major differences between the AR antagonists were observed in the androgen-regulated genes, which is consistent with varying degrees of inhibition by the drugs in this cell line. Next we determined the global H3K27 acetylation profiles which characterize open chromatin and active transcription. ChIP-seq analysis performed in LNCaP cells revealed a strong impact of androgen treatment on the H3K27 acetylation profiles of numerous genes involved in hormonal regulation. Darolutamide significantly reversed genome-wide H3K27 acetylation patterns, almost to non-androgen stimulated levels. More specifically, a reduction of H3K27 peaks was observed at KLK3 and FKBP5 regulatory elements. In addition, we determined the impact of AR antagonists on AR binding at the KLK2 and KLK3 regulatory elements. Darolutamide and enzalutamide strongly reduced androgen-stimulated AR binding whereas the impact of apalutamide was slightly lower.

Conclusions: AR antagonists strongly reversed the effects of the androgen R1881, both at the level of gene expression, and of H3K27 acetylation and AR binding. A detailed comparison between second-generation AR antagonists showed interesting differences in the regulation of genes in the Wnt and EMT pathways.

Citation Format: Simon J. Baumgart, Ekaterina Nevedomskaya, Ralf Lesche, Henrik Seidel, Bernard Haendler. A detailed comparison between second-generation AR antagonists reveals differences in the overall impact on gene regulation patterns in prostate cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1798.