Long-term success and predictors of atrial arrhythmia recurrence following left atrial flutter ablation
Authors: Ciechanski E , Merino D , Martinez Cossiani M , Castrejon Castrejon S , Jauregui Abularach M , Guido Lopez L E , Merino J L 
Published: May 2024

Background

In recent years, success rate of left atrial flutter (LAFL) ablation has witnessed improvement, attributed to enhanced comprehension of the arrhythmia mechanism and technological advancements. However, the recurrence rate and specific types of atrial arrhythmias, along with their potential predictors, remain inadequately understood.

Purpose

The aim of this study is to assess the factors influencing the efficacy, safety, and long-term success of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for LAFL.

Methods

Patients with sustained LAFL undergoing RF ablation were included in the study. LAFL mapping employed a combination of activation, voltage, and entrainment with 3D electroanatomical mapping. RF ablation targeted a protected isthmus of slow conduction, and if not localized, it involved creating lines of conduction block transecting the reentrant circuit or empirically created lines. Ablation success was defined as clean arrhythmia termination during RF application and no LAFL induction with pacing maneuvers. Follow-up included outpatient visits at 6 and 12 months. Ablation success at follow-up was defined as the absence of arrhythmia recurrence (≥30s) at regular outpatient or emergency department visits. Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics were analyzed and correlated with ablation success, complications, and freedom from arrhythmia recurrences at follow-up.

Results

The study included 104 consecutive patients undergoing LAFL ablation (67.5 ± 11.3 years, 67% male). Clinical characteristics comprised 12 with HFrEF, 44 with structural heart disease, 25 with valvular heart disease, 43 with previous pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation, and 39 with significant left atrium enlargement. Simultaneous cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTI) was performed in 46 patients. LAFL cycle length was 293±68 ms, with more than one LAFL mechanism (2.0±0.8 mechanisms) demonstrated in 76 patients (73%). The most common LAFL mechanism was perimetral reentry (37%). LAFL was successfully ablated 83% of cases, with 7 patients experiencing complications (4 tamponades and 3 sinus node dysfunctions following LAFL termination). At a median follow-up of 28 months, 35 patients (34%) had AFL recurrence, and 15 of them required a second ablation procedure. No factor was associated with LAFL recurrence, except for a short LAFL cycle length (P=0.04) at the ablation procedure. Demonstration of more than one LAFL mechanism (P=0.48) or LAFL termination by focal or linear RF application (P=0.99) were not associated with AFL recurrences at follow-up.

Conclusions

Despite the relatively high efficacy of LAFL ablation, the rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrences at follow-up after a single procedure remains elevated, predominantly in the form of AFL rather than AF. Short LAFL cycle length at the index procedure appears to be a significant predictor of these recurrences. Arrythmia cycle length proved to be predictive factor of LAFL ablation success rate.Peri-veinal left AFL, LAT map, CranialPeri-veinal left AFL, LAT map, PA