“Europeanism” between Politics and Culture: Historical Meanings and Contemporary Transformations (“Round Table” Materials)
Authors:   Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pruzhinin Boris , Kantor Vladimir ,   National Research University Higher School of Economics, Kasavina Nadezhda ,   Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kiyashchenko Larisa ,   Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kozyrev Aleksey ,   Lomonosov Moscow State University, Konacheva Svetlana ,   Russian State University for the Humanities, Mezhuev Boris ,   Lomonosov Moscow State University, Mikhailov Igor ,   Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Porus Vladimir ,   National Research University Higher School of Economics, Pskhu Ruzana ,   People’s Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Rozin Vadim ,   Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Serebriany Sergey ,   Russian State University for the Humanities, Baichun Zhang ,   Beijing Normal University, Chumakov Aleksandr ,   Lomonosov Moscow State University, Shchedrina Tatiana ,   Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Published: September 2024

The journal “Voprosy Filosofii” has repeatedly addressed various aspects of the philosophy of culture. In particular, issues of the interaction between Russia, the West, and the East, the unity of the world and the diversity of cultures, multicultur­alism and the dialogue of cultures, the role of the philosopher in culture, and the prospects for the development of Russian culture have been discussed. Special im­portance has been given to the understanding of cultural studies as a scientific and ed­ucational discipline. In April 2024, we once again turned to the philosophy of culture in the context of the problem of “Europeanism” and discussed the historical meanings and contemporary transformations of this cultural-historical phenomenon. The follow­ing questions were proposed for discussion. What constitutes the “essence” of Euro­pean culture? Does “Europeanism” have an obligatory historical and geographical at­tachment? Why does the methodological concept of “presentism-antiquarianism” gain crucial importance today, particularly for research in the field of the philosophy of cul­ture? Is antiquity the origin only of European culture, or is it the origin of the Great Culture? Is “Europeanization of the Earth” possible today? (Spengler, Husserl, Hei­degger). Who are the true heirs of antiquity today? Are there differences between Greek and Roman cultures? Which type has Europe inherited today, and to what ex­tent? Has the perception of “Europeanism” changed in Russian and world philosophy of the 19th–21st centuries? The role of Hegel in the mythologization of “Europe.” Is “Europeanism” a political myth of the 21st century? How do you evaluate the at­tempts at philosophical comparisons of the crisis of European culture in the 1920s and the 2020s? Does “Europeanism” exhaust European culture? And what philosophical or cultural problem do we want to see behind this? The crucial topic of discussion was the interpretation of Europeanism as a symbolic construct, connected with the assessment of the prospects for the development of the cultural future of Russia, Europe, and Humanity