HEALTH PER ACRE ORGANIC SOLUTIONS TO MALNUTRITION IN INDIA
Authors: Archana Ainapure Dr. 
Published: June 2024

Food, nutrition, health, prosperity, future and growth, as well as hunger, disease, poverty, despair and national collapse, are hotly debated topics. There is not only a correlation but also a cause and effect relationship. One of the oldest and most well-established careers in the world, agriculture is no longer economically viable for the majority of people, as thousands of farmers worldwide demonstrate. India has witnessed an increase in suicides in the last two decades. But the real question is whether our farmers killed themselves or our nation failed them. The primary goals of national agriculture are to promote health and feed its citizens with a diet rich in all essential nutrients. However, profit maximization was promoted as the primary goal of agriculture. The sad reality is that the more profitable agriculture becomes, the higher the farmer debt and suicide rate, and the worse the food and nutrition crisis becomes. Ironically, despite all the claims, profit maximization for farmers is still far from being achieved [1] while the country has paid a high price. One of the most commonly used chemicals in agriculture, pesticides, is generally claimed by proponents of conventional agriculture to have little or no effect on human health. However, every year, millions of tons of pesticides released into the environment in the name of high-yield agriculture end up in the bodies of people, animals, fish and birds. This is evident from the fact that quantifiable levels of certain pesticides have been found in breast milk, which pose a probable risk to breast-fed infants [2]. The gamble isn't insignificant, but instead dubious. The disturbing measure of synthetic substances in honey sold in the Indian market has as of late started a lot of conversation. The creation of science and technology was for the benefit of humanity. Conversely, science and innovation in farming frequently serve human eagerness. A portion of the world's enduring waterways don't arrive at the ocean and on second thought remain to some degree dry because of the broad water system necessities of regular farming. Traditional farming likewise contributes fundamentally to dangerous atmospheric devotions and adversely affects wellbeing. In this chapter, we will limit our discussion to the impact of conventional agriculture on population and individual health. This report considers the healthy and beneficial parts of food varieties from natural and conventional cultivation. Subjects in this section include patterns of disease in the population and how these patterns may be linked to the food we eat, as well as supplements delivered to individual parts of the soil using two cultivation frameworks. Conventional agriculture estimates "yield" per acre without considering the price of chemical inputs or their effects on the environment and human health. "Yield" measures the results of a monoculture, whereas we need to measure the different results of a farming system. The yield likewise doesn't give data on the healthy benefit of the food. With an emphasis on wellbeing and sustenance, we ought to gauge wellbeing per section of land instead of yield per section of land.