Surgical intervention patterns and long-term survival of bicuspid aortic valve patients: community-based versus tertiary-referral cohorts
Authors: Montoya Hernandez M A , Tsaban G , Scott C , Pislaru S V , Enriquez-Sarano M , Michelena H I 
Published: January 2025

Background

Bicuspid aortic valve(BAV) disease carries a cumulative lifetime morbidity &gt;80%. This morbidity includes surgery for aortic valve dysfunction, aortic dilatation, infective endocarditis, and aortic dissection. This study assessed surgical intervention patterns for BAV-related morbidity and long-term survival of these patients in a community-based cohort versus a tertiary referral cohort.

Methods

The tertiary-referral cohort included all patients with BAV-related surgeries across Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota), from January 1990 to May 2024. The community-based cohort included all patients with BAV-related surgeries in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from January 1980 to May 2024. The tertiary-referral cohort comprised 2529 BAV patients of which 991(39%) [mean age 53±15 years, 76% males] underwent aortic valve surgery(AVR), aorta surgery, or a combination thereof, while the community-based cohort included 652 BAV patients of whom 262(40%) [mean age 43±20 year, 70% males] had the mentioned interventions. Cumulative survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method compared to the U.S population. Statistical significance was evaluated using one-sample log rank statistics.

Results

In the tertiary-referral cohort, 530/991(54%) patients underwent isolated AVR, 62/991(6%) had isolated aortic surgery, and 399(40%) underwent combined procedures. In the community-based cohort, 179/262(68%) patients underwent isolated AVR, 30/262(11%) underwent isolated aortic surgery, and 53(21%) had combined surgeries. In the tertiary-referral cohort, 940 patients underwent AVR; 57% for aortic stenosis(AS), 29% for aortic regurgitation(AR), 13% for mixed valvular disease, and 1% for endocarditis. In comparison, in the community-based cohort, 236 patients underwent AVR for AS in 71%, AR 20%, mixed valvular disease 7%, and endocarditis 2%. In the tertiary-referral cohort, 459 patients underwent aortic surgery; 21% for the root, 69% for the ascending aorta, 1% for the arch, &lt;1% for aortic dissection, and 8% for coarctation repair. In comparison, 105 patients from the community-based cohort underwent aortic surgery; 33% for the root, 44% for the ascending aorta, 1% for the arch, 4% for aortic dissection and 18% coarctation repair. Compared to age- and sex-matched U.S. population, the relative risk for all cause death in the tertiary-referral cohort was 0.89 [95% CI: 0.70-1.11, p=0.35], whereas in the community-based cohort was 1.06 [95% CI: 0.85-1.32, p=0.57](Figure1).

Conclusion

Surgical intervention patterns were similar for community and tertiary BAV cohorts, with most patients undergoing isolated AVR or AVR plus aortic surgery, and isolated aortic surgery being uncommon. AVR indications were driven by AS, followed by AR and mixed valvular disease. Aortic surgery indications were driven by ascending aorta dilatation, followed by root dilatation and coarctation. Survival in both cohorts was similar to the U.S. general population.