Methods for Conducting Trends Analysis: Roadmap for Comparing Outcomes from Three National HIV Population-Based Household Surveys in Kenya (2007, 2012, and 2018)
Authors: Achia Thomas , Cervantes Ismael Flores , Stupp Paul , Musingila Paul , Muthusi Jacques , Waruru Anthony , Schmitz Mary , Bronson Megan , Chang Gregory , Bore John , Kingwara Leonard , Mwalili Samuel , Muttunga James , Gitonga Joshua , de Cock Kevin M. , Young Peter 
Published: October 2021

BackgroundFor assessing the HIV epidemic in Kenya, a series of independent HIV indicator household-based surveys of similar design can be used to assess trends in key indicators relevant to HIV prevention and control and to describe geographic and sociodemographic disparities, assess the impact of interventions, and develop strategies. We developed methods and tools to facilitate a robust analysis of trends across three national household-based surveys conducted in Kenya in 2007, 2012, and 2018. MethodsWe used data from the 2007 and 2012 Kenya AIDS Indicator surveys (KAIS 2007 and KAIS 2012) and the 2018 Kenya Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (KENPHIA 2018). To assess the design and other variables of interest from each study, variables were recoded to ensure that they had equivalent meanings across the three surveys. After assessing weighting procedures for comparability, we used the KAIS 2012 nonresponse weighting procedure to revise normalized KENPHIA weights. Analyses were restricted to geographic areas covered by all three surveys. The revised analysis files were then merged into a single file for pooled analysis. We assessed distributions of age, sex, household wealth, and urban/rural status to identify unexpected changes between surveys. To demonstrate how a trend analysis can be carried out, we used continuous, binary, and time-to-event variables as examples. Specifically, temporal trends in age at first sex and having received an HIV test in the last 12 months were used to demonstrate the proposed analytical approach. These were assessed with respondent-specific variables (age, sex, level of education, and marital status) and household variables (place of residence and wealth index). All analyses were conducted in SAS 9.4, but analysis files were created in Stata and R format to support additional analyses.ResultsThis study demonstrates trends in selected indicators to illustrate the approach that can be used in similar settings. The incidence of early sexual debut decreased from 7.99 (95% CI: 7.67–8.33) per 1,000 person-years at risk in 2007 to 6.68 (95% CI: 6.35–7.02) per 1,000 person-years at risk in 2012 and to 6.62 (95% CI: 6.4–6.85) per 1,000 person-years at risk in 2018. HIV-testing rates increased from 12.6% (95% CI: 11.6%–13.6%) in 2007 to 56.1% (95% CI: 54.6%–57.6%) in 2012 but decreased slightly to 55.6% [95% CI: 54.6%–56.6%) in 2018.ConclusionsOur approach can be used to support trend comparisons for variables in HIV surveys in low-income settings. Independent national household surveys can be assessed for comparability, adjusted as appropriate, and used to estimate trends in key indicators. Analyzing trends over time can not only provide insights into Kenya’s progress toward HIV epidemic control but also identify gaps.