Understanding patient-related barriers to hydroxyurea use among adolescent and adult patients with sickle cell disease in Mulago and Kiruddu hospitals, Uganda, a qualitative study
Authors: Namaganda Priscilla , Nantume Patience , Mubiru Kelvin Roland , Twimukye Adelliine , Wiltshire Christine Sekaggya 
Published: May 2024

Background

In 2016, Uganda added Hydroxyurea (HU) to the list of essential drugs to treat sickle cell disease SCD. However, Hydroxyurea utilization has been low for several countries in sub-Saharan Africa. This study examined patient-related barriers to hydroxyurea use among adolescent and adult patients with sickle cell disease in Mulago and Kiruddu hospitals, in Uganda.

Methods

To understand the patient-related barriers to hydroxyurea use among adolescent and adult patients with sickle cell disease, we conducted a parallel convergent mixed methods study at outpatient departments of two national referral hospitals in Uganda from October 2022 to January 2023. The cross-sectional mixed-methods study employed both quantitative and qualitative methods. We collected survey data from a systematic sample of 259 participants and conducted individual interviews with a purposive sample of 40 participants (20 adolescents or their caregivers and 20 adult patients with SCD) and interviewed them individually on their knowledge, perceptions, barriers, and facilitators of HU utilization. Descriptive data were analyzed using Stata 16, whereas qualitative data were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach supported by NVivo 12 software. We triangulated data to determine the concordance of qualitative and quantitative data.

Results

The study enrolled 40 participants for qualitative interviews and 259 patients for quantitative, with an average age of 16, over half being female, 46% having secondary education, and 96% unmarried. The prevalence of HU use was 78%. The study identified three themes as follows: Patient barriers at the individual including Inadequate knowledge about HU, Persistent pain, Poor adherence to HU, Poor communication with health care workers, and Psychosocial and emotional challenges. At the facility level, long queues and poor quality of care, drug-related side effects that affect HU, and drug stock-outs were reported. Myths, rumors, and misconceptions about HU, and gender-related barriers were reported to affect HU utilization at a community level. Facilitators for the use of HU and recommendations for improvement. Facilitators included perceived benefits, long duration on HU, information sharing by healthcare workers, availability of complementary drugs, confirmation of diagnosis, and availability of medication at public health facilities or private pharmacies. Patients suggested continuous adherence support, encouragement from healthcare workers, sensitization about benefits and risks, a peer-to-peer approach, and financial support for adolescents and women to start businesses to resolve financial problems.

Conclusion

Implementing the use of HU has been challenging in Uganda and needs improvement. Facilitators to hydroxyurea use have been highlighted, though Patient-identified barriers at individual, facility, and community levels that need to be resolved. The experiences and insights shared by our participants provide invaluable guidance for increasing the uptake of HU. Further studies are needed to establish validated instruments to assess patients’ pain communication and adherence to the HU regimen.