Characterization of pituitary function with emphasis on GH secretion in the chronic fatigue syndrome
Authors: Moorkens Greta , Berwaerts Joris , Wynants Herlindis , Abs Roger 
Published: March 2003

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have revealed that hormonal disturbances may accompany the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Changes in the secretion of the pituitary–adrenal axis have been demonstrated, as well as abnormalities in the GH‐IGF‐I axis. However, data have not always been well characterized and were sometimes conflicting. The small number of CFS patients investigated in earlier studies may have played a role in the interpretation of the results.

SUBJECTS AND DESIGN

Hormonal testing was performed in 73 nonobese CFS patients and nonobese 21 age‐and gender‐matched healthy controls. We investigated GH, ACTH and cortisol responses to insulin‐induced hypoglycaemia. In a subgroup of patients arginine and clonidine stimulation for GH was also performed. Nocturnal secretion of GH, ACTH and cortisol were determined. Serum levels of IGF‐I, prolactin, TSH, and free thyroxine were also measured. Visceral fat mass was assessed by CT scanning.

RESULTS

GH response to insulin induced hypoglycaemia assessed by peak value (17.0 ± 13.1 μg/l vs. 22.1 ± 9.8 μg/l; P = 0.01) and by AUC (450.0 ± 361.3 μg/l vs. 672.3 ± 393.0 μg/l; P = 0.002) was significantly decreased in CFS patients vs. controls. Nocturnal GH secretion assessed by GH peak value (5.4 ± 3.7 vs. 9.0 ± 5.1 μg/l; P = 0.44) and by AUC (34.4 ± 20.2 vs. 67.4 ± 43.1; P = 0.045) was also significantly impaired in CFS patients. Arginine and clonidine administration showed no differences in GH secretion between CFS patients and controls. In the CFS group, GH peak values were significantly higher after ITT than after arginine (P = 0.017) or clonidine (P = 0.001). No differences in serum IGF‐I levels were found between CFS patients and controls. Except for a significantly lower nocturnal cortisol peak value, no differences were found in ACTH and cortisol secretion between CFS patients and controls. Significantly higher serum prolactin levels (7.4 ± 4.7 μg/l vs. 4.4 ± 1.3 μg/l; P = 0.004) and significantly higher serum TSH levels (1.6 ± 1.0 mU/l vs. 1.0 ± 0.4 mU/l; P = 0.011) were found in CFS patients. Serum free thyroxine was comparable in both groups. Visceral fat mass was significantly higher in CFS patients (86.6 ± 34.9 cm2vs. 51.5 ± 15.7 cm2; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a significant impairment of GH response during insulin‐induced hypoglycaemia and a low nocturnal GH secretion in CFS patients. These changes did, however, not lead to different concentrations in serum IGF‐I. The clinical expression of this inadequate GH secretion can thus be questioned, although the alteration in body composition may be related to this relative GH deficiency. Significantly increased prolactin and TSH levels were found when compared to controls. These findings give support to the hypothesis of a decreased dopaminergic tone in CFS. Further investigations are required in order to identify specific adaptations within the neurotransmitter system in CFS and to determine the clinical importance of the impaired GH homeostasis.