Predictors of In-hospital and Short-term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience
Authors: Alegado-Aseniero Niña Carissa L , Ona Rowena , Mendoza Jeffrey 
Published: November 2024

BACKGROUND: Endovascular technique has replaced open repair as primary treatment for different aortic disease indications and was associated with low perioperative mortality and acceptable short-, mid-, and long-term survival. Locally, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was not widely practiced until year 2017. This study aims to determine the predictors of in-hospital and short-term outcomes of patients who underwent TEVAR for aortic aneurysm and aortic syndrome in a single center and how it compares with local and international data.

METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 52 adult patients who underwent TEVAR for the treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic syndrome. Demographic and clinical data, diagnostic imaging, and procedural details were obtained via inpatient charts at the medical records section and hospital system database archiving. Outcomes at 30 days and 1 year postprocedure were obtained through telephone follow-up after attaining verbal consent.

Gathered data were analyzed as to association of different variables with or without the presence of complications. Outcomes reported included in-hospital mortality rate, presence of major adverse events (MAEs), 30-day and 1-year survival rates, and rate of freedom from reintervention.

RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 7.69% (n = 4/52), and complication rate was 32% (n = 20/52), with a survival rate of 92.31% and 87.76% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. The rates of overall freedom from reintervention were 83.33% and 100% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. The independent predictors for in-hospital mortality and development of MAEs were increasing weight (odds ratio [OR], 1.0588; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.003–1.208), preexisting chronic kidney disease (OR, 10.33; 95% CI, 1.1069–96.462), and TEVAR with debranching done as a single procedure (OR, 3.6667; 95% CI, 1.1154–12.054), whereas an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 49.05 ± 19.25 (OR, 0.9402; 95% CI, 0.9019–0.9801) and TEVAR with debranching done as a staged procedure (OR, 0.1624; 95% CI, 0.0321–0.8225) statistically decrease the risk for development of in-hospital mortality and MAEs (P = 0.001 and P = 0.028, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, indications for TEVAR were fusiform and saccular aneurysm, high-risk intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer, complicated acute type B dissection, chronic complicated type B dissection with high-risk feature, and aortic rupture. The outcome of this study shows comparable results with other international studies with an acceptable in-hospital mortality rate, complication rate, short-term survival rate, and rate freedom from reintervention at 30 days and 1 year. Increasing weight, preexisting chronic kidney disease, and TEVAR with debranching done as a single setting are independent predictors for developing in-hospital mortality and MAEs, whereas a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate and TEVAR with debranching done as a staged procedure decrease the risk; hence, careful planning and scheduling of procedure among elective and amenable cases could further reduce complication rates of future TEVAR procedures.