Variations of Stromboli activity related to the 2019 paroxysmal phase revealed by SOM clustering of seismo-acoustic data and its comparison with video recordings and GBInSAR measurements&#160;
Authors: Giudicepietro Flora , Calvari Sonia , D'Auria Luca , Di Traglia Federico , Layer Lukas , Macedonio Giovanni , Caputo Teresa , De Cesare Walter , Ganci Gaetana , Martini Marcello , Orazi Massimo , Peluso Rosario , Scarpato Giovanni , Spina Laura , Nolesini Teresa , Casagli Nicola , Tramelli Anna , Esposito Antonietta M. 
Published: March 2022

&lt;p&gt;Two paroxysmal explosions occurred on Stromboli in the summer of 2019 (July 3 and August 28). The first of these explosions resulted in the death of one person. Furthermore, an effusive phase began on July 3 and lasted until August 30, 2019. This dangerous eruptive phase of Stromboli was not preceded by evident variations in the geophysical parameters routinely monitored, therefore the volcano was considered to be in a state of normal activity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To investigate the precursors of the 2019 eruptive crisis and explain the absence of variations in the parameters routinely monitored, we analyzed the seismo-acoustic signals with an unsupervised neural network capable of discovering hidden structures of the data. We clustered about 14,200 seismo-acoustic events recorded in 10 months (November 15, 2018 - September 15, 2019) using a Self-Organizing Map (SOM). Then we compared the clustering result with the images of visible and thermal monitoring cameras, that were installed and managed by the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy, and with the Ground-Based Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar displacement measurements of the summit area of the volcano recorded by BGInSAR devices, which were installed and managed by Universit&amp;#224; Degli Studi di Firenze, Italy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The SOM analysis of the seismo-acoustic features associated with the selected dataset of explosions allowed us to recognize three main clusters in the period November 15, 2018 - September 15, 2019. We named these three clusters Red, Blue, and Green. The analysis of a subset of the selected explosions (approximately 180 events) through the videos of the visible and thermal monitoring cameras allowed us to associate distinct explosive types to the three main seismo-acoustic clusters. In particular, the cluster Red was associated with explosions characterized by well collimated oriented jets of ~ 200 m height, which eject incandescent ballistics and produce a significant infrasonic transient. The cluster Blue was associated with gas explosions with a height of 10 - 20 m and with little or no ash and pyroclastic fragment ejection. These types of explosions may not be detected by the camera recordings and infrasonic sensors. On the contrary, they are well recorded in the VLP seismic signals (filtered in the 0.05 - 0.5 Hz frequency band). The cluster Green includes explosions characterized by the emission of incandescent spatter-like fragments, with a wide range of ejection angles and hemispherical shape. The explosions of the cluster Red are mainly generated in the NE vent region, whereas the explosions of clusters Blue and Green are generally located in the central and SW vent regions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Comparing these results with the temporal evolution of the displacement of the summit area measured by the GBInSAR device, we discovered that the variations of the eruptive style that were highlighted by the SOM clustering of the seismic-acoustic features are recognizable in the ground deformation temporal pattern. Our findings are relevant for the improvement of monitoring of volcanoes with persistent activity and volcano early warning.&lt;/p&gt;