bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025 huggingface dataset:
158 Building a National Network for Collaborative Quantitative Staff
Authors: Khalatbari Shokoufeh , Taylor Sandra , Sammel Davis Marry , Stedman Margaret , Palmer Joycelynne , Smith Shelby
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Quantitative Staff are an essential workforce for biomedical research. While faculty can engage with peers locally and through national organizations, similar opportunities are limited for staff and often do not meet their unique needs and interests. Creating a professional community is valuable for supporting and developing this workforce. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We established the Quantitative Scientific Staff National Network (QS2N2) with the mission to provide professional development and networking opportunities, and to serve as an information resource and advocate through the fostering of community among staff quantitative analysts at any career stage. The initial membership outreach was to all Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD) programs through members of ACTS BERD Special Interest Group (SIG). We created a Leadership Team and an Advisory Board consisting of staff and faculty biostatisticians with experience working as or managing staff to govern the network. A Core Planning Committee consisting of 15 members guides planning, implementation, and execution of network activities as operationalized through subcommittees. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The network currently has 131 members from over 30 health science institutions. Subcommittees focused on Education and Training, Membership, Communication and Web Development, and Mentoring were created and are developing events, programs and infrastructure to further the network’s mission. Network events such as webinars will be offered quarterly; with our first event planned for Nov 3rd. Expansion and maturation of QS2N2 will be done through regular remote meetings where members can connect with peers at other institutions, engage in career development activities, and attend technical seminars. Additional membership outreach will seek to connect with staff in government and private sectors. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Knowledgeable, highly skilled collaborative analysts (e.g., biostatisticians, data scientists) are an essential workforce in clinical and translational science and health research centers.The QS2N2 will support professional development, engagement and growth of this critical workforce which is necessary to advance quality research.
176 Translational Challenges and Facilitators of Health Equity Research Integrating Social Determinants of Health with Patient- and Community-Centered Technology
Authors: Volkov Boris , Pulley Chris , Haynes David
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: - Illustrate findings of a translational science case study of multi-pronged research aimed at understanding of social determinants in health disparities and integrating patient-centered technology; - Illuminate translational mechanisms by analyzing and sharing research challenges, facilitators, and benefits. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Utilized novel TS evaluation methods and tools: - Translational Science Case Study protocol to examine translational path from innovation to practice, barriers and facilitators for that translational movement. - Translational Science Benefits Model (TSBM) Checklist for translational/research impact analysis. Triangulated diverse data sources: - Primary data: semi-structured interviews with research partners. - Secondary data: researchers’ grant applications, reports, and publications; public stories/news related to their research; scientific publications; organizational/policy documents; and interviews with research stakeholders featured in published sources. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Translational challenges include: culturally tailored education and outreach; data analysis and intervention planning; engaging community stakeholders in the development and implementation; addressing economic and resource-related challenges. Translational facilitators are: UMN CTSA funding and other support; access to data and resources; use of open-source materials; evidence-based/best practice approaches; diversity and collaboration between researchers, community organizations, healthcare providers; researchers’ drive to translate. The research contributes to community and public health, clinical/medical, and economic benefits, health equity advocacy, catalyzing further research, and public awareness. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The evaluation case study contributes to translational science by providing evidence and lessons learned related to translational benefits, challenges, and facilitators of community-based, patient-centered research bringing people, knowledge, and technology together and contributing to health equity.
177 Placing Participant Experiences at the Center of Improving Research by Empowering the Participant Voice
Authors: Kost Rhonda , Chatterjee Ranee , Dozier Ann , Ford Daniel , Andrews Joseph , Green Nancy , Harris Paul A. , Cheng Alex
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Empowering the Participant Voice (EPV) is a 6-CTSA Rockefeller-led collaboration to developcustom REDCap infrastructure to collect participant feedback using the validated Research Participant Perception Survey (RPPS), demonstrate its value in use cases, and disseminate it for broad adoption. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The EPV team developed data and survey implementation standards, and specifications for the dashboard and multi-lingual RPPS/REDCap project XML file. The VUMC built a custom At-a-Glance Dashboard external module that displays Top Box scores (percent best answer), with conditional formatting to aid analysis, and response/completion rates. Results populate site dashboards, and aggregate to a multi-site dashboard for benchmarking. Results can be filtered by participant/study characteristics. Sites developed individual use cases, leveraging local infrastructure, initiatives and stakeholder input. Infrastructure and guides were designed for dissemination through public websites. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Five sites sent 23,797surveys via email, patient portal or SMS. 4,133 (19%) participants diverse in age, race, and ethnicity, returned responses. Sites analyzed their data and acted on selected findings, improving recruitment, communication and feeling valued. Aggregate scores for feeling listened to and respected were hight (>90%%); scores for feeling prepared by the consent process were lower (57-77%) and require action. Some groups experiences were better than others. Sites differed significantly in some scores. Dissemination of EPV is underway. Infrastructure and guides are downloadable free of charge, with advice from the EPV team. In 2023, a sixth site began piloting a lower literacy survey version and syncing data to the consortium dashboard. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The EPV RPPS/REDCap infrastructure enabled sites to collect participant feedback, identify actionable findings and benchmark with peers. Stakeholders and collaborators designed and tested local initiatives to increase responses and diversity, address disparities, and discover better practices.
178 Pace and Pitch: Predictive Factors for Seed Funding and Development
Authors: Eggleston Alyson
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Securing seed funding and external support can be a daunting process. Institutions are increasingly looks for quantitative assurance of impact and accountability. This study investigates factors predictive of seed funding selection, including pace of submissions as well as external support. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using Generalized Logistic Mixed Models (GLMMs), we model factors found to be predictive of researcher success, and model demographic factors as well, to understand the complex interplay of researcher background, professional networks and preparation, and researcher persistence. The following factors were modeled as potentially predictive of researcher success: faculty rank; co-PI; h-index; rate of application; prior award funding amounts; and research-focused social media posts. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: After effects are finalized, we expect that pace of seed fund applications and the strength co-PIs, as measured by h-indices, to be significant predictors of researcher success for both securing seed funding and external support. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies features associated with eventual research program success and can be used to support accountability and impact efforts at an institutional level. Research institutes strive to ensure equal access to these opportunities and train applicants to produce improved project proposals. Results from this study inform these efforts.
183 Translational Health Informatics Support Service Practices, Challenges, and Facilitators
Authors: Volkov Boris , Pulley Chris , Sieger Gretchen , Johnson Steve
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Utilized novel TS evaluation methods and tools: - Translational Science Case Study protocol adapted to examine translational support service practices, barriers and facilitators influencing translational movement. - Translational Science Benefits Model (TSBM) Checklist elements for translational/research impact analysis. Triangulated diverse data sources: - Primary data: semi-structured interviews with translational service stakeholders. - Secondary data: service’s applications, reports, and publications; public stories/news related to their research support; scientific publications; organizational/policy documents; and interviews with research stakeholders featured in published sources. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Translational challenges include: complexity and constant change of health data; lack of data/informatics literacy amongst researchers; limited appreciation and funding for research data services; silos of functionality and data related to biomedical informatics. Translational facilitators are: the UMN CTSA support; available infrastructure and knowledge base; researchers as the best promoters for services; multidisciplinary collaborations with research/community/healthcare teams; best practice approaches; and learning by doing. The translational/research support service contributes to community and public health, clinical/medical benefits, data literacy, catalyzing data-rich research, and health equity. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The evaluation case study provides evidence and lessons learned related to translational benefits, challenges, and facilitators of a successful translational research support service integrating best informatics practices in clinical research and contributing to health equity improvement.
188 DIFFERENTIAL CHANGES IN YOUTH TOBACCO USE BEFORE AND AFTER IMPLEMENTATION OF MASSACHUSETTS’ STATEWIDE FLAVOR RESTRICTION POLICY
Authors: Singer Jill M. , Roberts Megan E.
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This study examined youth tobacco use, disaggregated by sexual and gender minority (SGM) identity and race, in Massachusetts before and after the state implemented a flavored tobacco restriction. We assessed if the policy differentially impacted groups that have had higher rates of flavored tobacco use (i.e., SGM and African Americans [AAs]). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Data for this analysis came from the 2019 and 2021 Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), a biennial, national survey conducted among high school students, provided by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Changes in current use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes between 2019 and 2021 were examined for the entire sample and by SGM identity and race/ethnicity. Current cigarette use and current e-cigarette use were defined as reporting any use of the product in the past 30 days. We received confirmation from the IRB that because the data are de-identified and available to the public, this research is considered Not Human Subjects Research. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2021, current cigarette use and current e-cigarette use decreased for the entire sample (3.78% to 2.79% and 27.69% to 15.74%, respectively). Decreases were also observed after disaggregating results, but smaller changes were observed among minoritized groups (i.e., SGM and AAs), particularly for e-cigarettes. Current e-cigarette use decreased 25.56% among individuals identifying as SGM (28.14% to 20.95%) compared to a 49.33% decrease among non-SGM individuals (27.63% to 14.0%). Among all races, AAs had the lowest prevalence of current e-cigarette use in 2019 (15.10%), but also saw the lowest percentage decrease (17.68%). Among whites, current e-cigarette use decreased 45.75% from 32.33% in 2019 to 17.54% in 2021. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: After implementation of Massachusetts’ flavored tobacco restriction, current cigarette and e-cigarette use declined among Massachusetts youth overall and among groups that have been most affected by flavored tobacco. However, minoritized groups (i.e., SGMs, AAs) had lower percentage decreases compared to non-minoritized groups.
203 Assessing social determinants of health and psychosocial factors critical to sustaining recovery among pregnant and parenting women with opioid use disorder
Authors: Titus-Glover Doris
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This study explored personal recovery support, including social determinants of health and psychosocial needs to understand factors for sustaining recovery among parenting and pregnant women with opioid use disorder. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This study used a mixed method quantitative/qualitative design and recruited women from residential/transitional facilities in an urban area. We used the Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs tool to assess social determinants of health factors, level of physical activity, family/community support, and mental health (stress). Through focus groups, we interviewed women to describe challenges to recovery and to resources including access to providers, housing, childcare, and food assistance from lived experiences. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Survey analysis showed social determinants of health factors such as food and transportation were partially mitigated by residential living; however, parenting and pregnant women with opioid use disorder remained concerned about housing and finances; and encountered low levels of physical activity and significant stress. Preliminary results from the focus groups revealed a theme of positive recovery and retention experiences from residential living. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Evidence from studies suggests focused interventions for recovering women to reduce relapse risk factors and adverse maternal outcomes. Opportunities for improving personal recovery capital are accessible in residential facilities, however, further exploration of unmet social determinants of health factors are needed for recovery retention.
205 A Qualitative Study of Black and Latine HIV Care Consumers’ Perceptions of Providers’ Behaviors, Medical Mistrust, and Experiences of Discrimination
Authors: Adekunle Toluwani E. , Dong Lu , Bogart Laura M.
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: There is a scarcity of research examining the views of Black and Latine HIV care consumers on healthcare experiences that influence medical mistrust. The present qualitative study aims to bridge the existing gaps in the literature pertaining to the experiences of Black and Latine HIV care consumers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted 21 semi-structured interviews with Black and Latine HIV care consumers from November to December 2021 to explore perceptions of provider behaviors that increase or decrease HIV care consumers’ trust and mistrust, experiences of stigma, and behaviors and responses when experiencing medical mistrust. Conventional content analysis was conducted to derive meaning from the narratives shared by participants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Provider behaviors that increase HIV care consumers’ mistrust include lack of person-centered care, lack of partnership in health decision making, perceived provider incompetence, lack of adequate follow-up to care, and lack of trustworthiness of providers and organizations. Perceived experiences of intersectional stigma in healthcare included feeling judged and discriminated against by healthcare providers regarding HIV status and observing differential care outcomes and delayed care delivery by race and ethnicity. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Findings can inform the development of provider-level interventions to address medical mistrust.
206 Cervical Cancer Disparities: Knowledge, Screening and Willingness to adopt testing modalities among Hispanic/Latinx Women in Lake County, Indiana
Authors: Claure Layla , Balian Lara , Rodriguez Natalia
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: There are notable disparities in cervical cancer screening. Theobjective of this study was to examine knowledge, screening practices, attitudes towards cervical cancer screening, and willingness to adopt screening innovations such as self-sampling and HPV rapid testing for cervical cancer among Hispanic women in Lake County, Indiana. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This mixed-methods study encompassed an online cross-sectional survey (n=231) and in-depth interviews (n=9) of individuals with a cervix aged 21-65 residing in Lake County, Indiana. Outcome variables focused on cervical cancer knowledge, willingness to adopt self-sampling, and willingness to adopt HPV rapid testing. Descriptive statistics included frequencies and percentages. A cervical cancer knowledge score was computed from 7 questions. Scores below the mean 3.62 were labeled ‘low’ while higher scores were ‘high’. We also examined associations between demographic and outcome variables. Quantitative analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Qualitative analysis was conducted using NVIVO software to thematically analyze interviews using deductive and inductive coding techniques. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Majority of participants identified as Hispanic (58%), aged 31 or older (58%). While 80.5% reported being screened for cervical cancer, only 44.6% demonstrated ‘high' cervical cancer knowledge. 89.6% felt screening is important as emphasized in qualitative findings for its preventive value. Over half were willing to take their vaginal swab in clinic (55.8%) and at home (51.9%). However, among the Hispanic/Latinx groups reluctance to adopt self-sampling was notable (56.7% in clinic and 62.7% at home). Qualitative analysis revealed concerns about test accuracy. Willingness to use a hypothetical HPV rapid had higher acceptance (69.7%), with 52.2% in the Hispanic/Latinx group. Qualitative findings highlight benefits like increased screening access, comfort, and convenience offered by an HPV rapid test. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Hispanic/Latinx women in the sample were less willing to adopt cervical cancer screening methods such as self-sampling and rapid testing compared to non-Hispanic whites. Despite being considered beneficial for testing among vulnerable populations, our study found limited acceptance from these populations for various reasons.
213 Accelerating Translational Science Through Dissemination Grants with Community Impact
Authors: Allen Polly Gipson , Piechowski Tricia , Bailey Sarah , Marsh Erica E.
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Promoting Academics and Community Engagement (PACE) Dissemination grants are funding opportunities via the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research Community Engagement program designed to support the science of clinical and translational research demonstrating community impact. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Two statewide funding announcements over a 3-month period were issued to over 2,000 academic and community partners. Proposals were required to meet the following criteria: 1) data collection from an academic and community partnered research project completed; 2) research findings analyzed; and 3) a community-focused dissemination plan developed. Projects were funded up to $5000. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Six PACE dissemination grants with community-focused plans were funded spanning Southeast, Western, and the Upper Peninsula regions of Michigan, as well as statewide. Examples of funded projects topics areas include the following: firearm safety; housing discrimination; opioid misuse; suicide prevention; and youth mental health. Community dissemination activities include: a) presenting at a community town hall; b) writing a pamphlet for community use; c) creating artwork installation showcase for community display; d) storytelling through community channels; and e) designing and implementing a local social media campaign. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Traditional funding mechanisms often do not provide resources to disseminate research findings with community benefit or impact back to communities. Funding dissemination awards through the PACE mechanism directly supports and accelerates translational science by sharing results directly back to the community in meaningful ways.
230 Assessing the Role of Youth Sports in Diabetes Prevention and Perceived Discrimination
Authors: George-Komi Leesi , Robinson Leah
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our study aims to 1) examine the link between engagement in CLR Academy and youth diabetes risk factors—physical activity, nutrition, mental health, and weight status; 2) examine CLR’s role in moderating the relationship between perceived discrimination and these risk factors. Includes a program evaluation of CLR & interviews of members. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Youth-onset diabetes is rising in American minority communities. Youth sports programs like the Community Leadership Revolution (CLR) Academy in Washtenaw County, MI are emerging responses to this issue. CLR targets diabetes risk factors through team sports by promoting mindfulness and healthy habits. Employing a mixed-methods, pretest-posttest approach, our study focuses on how the frequency of engagement in CLR impacts CLR’s effect on youth’s diabetes risk factors. Considering the discrimination minority youth experience, we also aim to see if CLR potentially buffers the impact of perceived discrimination on diabetes risk factors. A posttest program evaluation of CLR will also include semi-structured interviews with CLR staff and participants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There is potential that youth with high engagement in CLR Academy may see enhanced benefits in managing diabetes risk factors compared to less active participants. This may be particularly true for youth experiencing high perceived discrimination, with potential marked improvements in mental health, like reduced anxiety and depression. Additionally, through a program evaluation and semi-structured interviews, our study aims to uncover the factors contributing to CLR’s success as a community-led intervention while also identifying areas for enhancement. Post-study, CLR will receive financial support to integrate these insights into their program, furthering their effectiveness in youth diabetes prevention and overall well-being. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study may provide significant insights into the relationship between sports participation, diabetes risk factors, and perceived discrimination. The findings could help CLR improve its program and guide more effective diabetes prevention strategies in minority youth through other youth sports programs.
233 Transforming the Academy of Community Reviewers (ACR) course into an E-Learning course in the Post COVID-19 Pandemic Era
Authors: Neal Jasmine , Jones Carolynn T. , Mathews Tanya , Macias Virginia , Varia Sapna , Snavely Valerie
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objectives of the Academy of Community Reviewers (ACR) serve to: (1) provide comprehensive education and training to community members about clinical research and the community review process for clinical research grants; and (2) collaborate with the community in the development of the training to ensure benefice and meaningful engagement. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This training targets community members who will serve as future grant reviewers for The Ohio State University Center for Clinical Translational Science (CCTS) pilot grant submissions, other grant submissions and as expert consultants on other projects needing community perspectives. In 2019 and 2020, this training was offered as a live session. Thirty-eight community reviewers were trained and have served as grant reviewers and consultants on over 70 projects. Based on feedback of former graduates, time demands, logistics, and technology advances warranted transitioning the course to an online learning platform. ACR graduates were consulted in course redesign and updates. Course revisions include material on DEIA, implicit bias and health equity in clinical research with narrated lectures. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Each of the 7 modules (including a total of 15 submodules) will have a brief summary knowledge check. The module “How to incorporate diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility in health research” will invite trainees to independently explore their own social identity and biases through a guided exercise. The last (7th) module will have interactive opportunities for submitting grant reviews and participation in an online grant review session, geared to The Ohio State University CCTS. ACR graduates have been invited to consult on educational material and pilot the new course. Demographic, knowledge assessments and module evaluations will be collected. An overall course evaluation and focus group interviews with graduates will also be analyzed for quality improvement and contributions in grant reviews. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The increased accessibility of the ACR course will foster more inclusive community engagement and support the development of clinical and translational research that is innovative, efficient, equitable, and relevant to its beneficiaries. This in depth community reviewer training has been designed to be used and customized to other CTSA Hubs.
247 Virtual community and partner-engaged panels - We can do them, but should we?
Authors: Skolarus Lesli , Sutton Tamara , Tandon Darius , Serrato Josefina
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We describe the transition of ShAred Resource Panels (ShARPs) within the Center for Community Health (CCH) at Northwestern University’s Clinical and Translational Sciences (NUCATS) Institute to virtual sessions and explore ongoing practices. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Restrictions placed during the COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in community-engaged health equity research, such as the transition of community and partner-engaged panels from in-person to virtual. ShARPs have occurred since December 2015. The model includes research team members, community members, community co-facilitator, and CCH staff. These custom panels bring together 8-10 community members familiar with a research topic or community of focus, offering feedback on adaptations that can improve research relevance and feasibility. Until the COVID-19 pandemic, all ShARPs were conducted in person. From March 2020 to January 2023, panels occurred virtually. From 2023, the option of virtual or in-person ShARPs has been available. Count data and informal interview data were reviewed. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The number of ShARPs peaked in 2019 and has remained stable. The first virtual ShARP occurred on April 22, 2020, and all subsequent sessions have been virtual. As of October 2023, 6 ShARPs have occurred, with no research teams pursuing an in-person session despite its availability. Participants described virtual ShARPs as convenient and accessible. Academic teams cited concern about low community member participation should they opt for an in-person session. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: It is feasible to conduct ShARPs virtually and is the current preferred modality. Whether virtual ShARPs enhance, neutralize, or detract from the effectiveness of the session is unknown and guides our future work. More research is needed, including discussion, and learning from our CTSA colleagues.
251 The Appalachian Translational Research Network (ATRN) Newsletter: Supporting Communication and Collaboration among Academic and Community Partners to Improve Health in Appalachia
Authors: Hall Ashley Gail , Stringer Beverly , Grever Jeff , Moore Ian , Jones Emma , Crawford Rebekah , Moore Keena , Miller Kristin , Mudd-Martin Gia
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Appalachian Translational Research Network (ATRN) Newsletter provides a unique platform that facilitates communication among Appalachian-serving CTSAs/CTSIs and partnering academic and community organizations that strengthens research efforts and advances translational science across the region. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Published biannually, each ATRN Newsletter features content submitted by ATRN member universities and organizations. Members of the Communications Committee, who represent both CTSA- or non-CTSA- affiliated ATRN member institutions, provide as well as review and edit content for the Newsletter. Regular features include researcher and community member spotlights; funding opportunity announcements; information on upcoming seminars, trainings, and special events; and opportunities for collaborations among partnering ATRN institutions. Complementing regularly scheduled Newsletters, special editions are released as warranted, such as a special COVID-19 focused edition published in 2020. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: First published in 2012, the ATRN Newsletter initially represented founding ATRN institutions, the University of Kentucky and the Ohio State University CTSAs, and a readership of 50. Reflecting ATRN growth that now represents 9 academic centers including NCATS- and IDeA-funded hubs, affiliated universities and partnering organizations, readership has grown to include 500 subscribers from across the U.S. and 3 other countries. With the establishment of the official ATRN website in 2019, the ATRN Newsletter became a prominent addition, providing ATRN members’ access to both new and archived editions, thereby expanding reach and further strengthening critical communication across the Network. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Providing a vehicle for communication that supports ATRN collaborations and networking, the Newsletter is foundational to the success of the ATRN mission to improve health outcomes across Appalachia by fostering collaborative inter-institutional and community-academic research partnerships.
266 “How will I get there” Institutional guidance and support for research-related transportation to engage diverse participants from underrepresented populations
Authors: Prestayko Nicholas , Zgierska Aleksandra
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Transportation is a barrier to research participation, especially for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds. Our goal was to review existing policies and create recommendations for institutional guidance on research-related transportation to support a long-term birth cohort study. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To summarize existing institutional policies on research-related transportation (i.e., transportation of participants or research staff travel to/from research activities), we requested and, in addition, searched for such policies across 28 sites involved in the NIH HEAL Initiative’s HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) study. The HBCD study plans to enroll 7,500 pregnant/postpartum persons, follow their children and families long-term, and assess factors influencing brain and child development. The obtained policies were then summarized, followed by identification of gaps in their recommendations and guidance. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Outreach to the HBCD study sites and search of their institutional websites resulted in identification of 6 institutional policies or other guidance related to research-related transportation across five HBCD study sites. Three policies/guidance related to ride-share programs in research, two related to reimbursement for participant travel, and the fifth was about car seats. Through the online search, we also found policies or written guidance about employee-related transportation within 15 HBCD study sites in total; they largely pertained to employee business travel and did not specifically address research-related transportation. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: To optimally support research teams, participants, and to promote the enrollment and retention of participants from diverse backgrounds, it is critical for research institutions to develop and implement guidance on research-related transportation and remove barriers to participation in research.
281 Catalyzing Community and Stakeholder Engagement (CSE) in Research: Perspectives from Scientist and Stakeholder Experience
Authors: Chen Siyu , Brewer Sarah K. , Sege Robert , Must Aviva , Prokofieva Nadia , Concannon Thomas W. , Rushforth Alice , Welch Lisa
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Community and other stakeholder engagement (CSE) is critical for relevant and equitable clinical research, yet implementation poses challenges. This study delineates the perspectives of scientists and diverse stakeholders regarding facilitators and challenges in CSE, its perceived value, and their recommendations for successful CSE. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Tufts CTSI Pilot Studies Program requires applicants to propose a plan for CSE while implementing the award, including which stakeholders (SHs)—community members, clinicians, and others affected by the research--will be involved and at what stages. This qualitative study assessed the experiences of both Principal Investigators (PIs) and SHs engaged in pilot projects from three cohorts of awardees (2019-21). Recruitment targeted one PI and one SH per project. Semi-structured interviews explored their CSE experiences, including facilitators, challenges, meaningfulness, perceived impact, intent to participate in CSE in future studies, as well as recommendations for funders, research support organizations, and investigators. Inductive consensus-based coding and thematic analysis was employed. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Fourteen PIs from different pilot projects and a SH from five of these projects participated. Almost all PIs (92%) had over six years of experience, but two-thirds (67%) had little or no experience with CSE. Four SHs self-identified as representatives of community organizations and one as a clinician scientist. CSE was a “win-win” for both PIs and SHs, and all PIs intended to involve SHs in other research studies. Three facilitators were identified as fostering effective CSE (e.g., PI access to CSE expertise while conducting the project), while four challenges hindered it (e.g., limits on SH capacity and CSE funding). SHs advised scientists to build authentic, sustained relationships, and PIs and SHs provided three actionable recommendations for funders and research support organizations to deepen and expand CSE. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Perspectives of scientists and SHs engaged in research projects are vital for expanding and sustaining effective CSE in research. Funders and research support organizations can enhance their strategies for CSE integration in clinical and translational research by incorporating these diverse views to ensure the research achieves maximal impact.
3 A mobile health-supported bundle to improve routine childhood vaccine completion rate in Nigeria
Authors: Ekhaguere Osayame , Oluwafemi Rosena O. , Mendonca Eneida A.
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Barriers to childhood vaccine completion include forgeting vaccine appointments, lack of clinic access (distance and funds), and vaccine hesitancy. We tested the impact of automated and real-time appointment reminders, vaccine hesitancy counseling, and targeted vaccine drives on receiving the third dose of the diphtheria vaccine. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: An implementation study to determine the feasibility and impact of implementing a mobile health-supported intervention bundle. A digital vaccine registry was developed to manage vaccine uptake data. The intervention bundle was applied sequentially: each registered parent received an automated appointment phone reminder (text and voice). If they delayed for >5 days, they received a real time reminder phone call. If during the real time call vaccine hesitancy was deemed to be a barrier, counseling was provided. If access - lack of funds or long distance - to the clinic was the barrier, vaccination was performed at patient's home on the monthly vaccine drives. We compared vaccine completion (all childhood vaccines before 18 months) during the implementation to the preceding three years. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate the implementation will be feasible as >90% of all eligible children will be registered. We expect providers will be accepting and would recommend the intervention to other providers. We anticipate the intervention will result in a >10% increase in childhood vaccine completion compared to the average of the past three years. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: We anticipate applying a multifaceted intervention will be acceptable to providers, feasible to implement, and significantly improve childhood vaccine completion rates moving Nigeria closer to achieving the global target of >95% childhood vaccine completion rate.
307 Revealing Candidate Inherited Retinal Disease Candidates via Genome-wide Screening of Knockout Mice
Authors: Yang Benjamin , Shao Andy , Jundi Mustafa , Shea Michael , Ylagan Cameron , Moshiri Ala
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this study is to reveal strong candidate genes for inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) in humans to better understand the mechanisms behind IRD development and reveal potential therapeutic targets. We hope these findings will help improve our understanding of IRDs and, subsequently, diagnostic accuracy and prognosis for IRD patients. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The goal of the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium is to identify the function of all protein-coding genes in the mouse genome via generation and phenotypic characterization of single gene knockout (KO) mice. Using this database, we identified all KO strains associated with abnormal retinal phenotypes, removed all RNA coding genes and pseudogenes, converted to human orthologues, and conducted a literature search for existing research regarding candidate IRD genes and retinal function/abnormalities. A similar process was used for RetNet genes. Subsequently, we performed bioinformatics analysis, including functional annotation (e.g. panther-db), pathway analysis (e.g. KEGG), and string-db to visualize known and predicted protein-protein interactions between the two data sets. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Analysis of the IMPC database revealed, out of 8481 phenotyped genes, 572 unique protein coding genes were associated with 14 categories of retinal abnormalities such as abnormal retinal vasculature and abnormal retinal thickness, 377 of which have never been associated with retinal pathology in humans or mice. Pathway analysis of the IMPC database highlighted a general metabolism pathway as well as PI3K-Akt and MAPK pathways, not found in RetNet pathway results. Unique clusters from functional annotation clustering of the IMPC include DNA methylation and protein ubiquination. Visualization of protein-protein interactions in string-db between the IMPC (mouse) and RetNet (human) revealed 4 clusters of interest with gold standard RetNet IRD proteins interacting with candidate IMPC IRD proteins. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: IMPC analysis revealed 572 candidate IRD genes, 377 of which are novel with no existing independent research related to the retina outside of the IMPC. Bioinformatic analysis reveals 4 strong clusters of interest through string-db where a gold standard RetNet gene interacts with candidate IRD genes as well as many functional pathways of interest.
313 Data-Driven Evaluation of Community Health Worker Program
Authors: Tchoua Roselyne , Karam Kate , McCabe Kelly
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Thiswork is an evidential study that demonstrates the positive impactof integrating Community Health Workers (CHWs) and SocialDeterminants of Health on an important health outcome, notably in decreasing the 30-day unplanned hospital ED readmissions at Sinai Health Systems. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using datafrom the Sinai Urban Health Institute (SUHI), we compare predictingthe readmissions of patients with and without data pertainingto Social Determinants of Health (SDoH). We thoroughly describe the data cleaning and data pre-processing, done in collaboration with experts in community health. We use a fundamental and ubiquitous classifier in Random Forest for its feature characterization capability in order to translate models results into insights and recommendations for the CHW program. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We show that when patients are simply engaged byCHWs, regardless of the content of those conversations, we canincrease the predictive accuracy of our classifier by 5%. We usethis result to make recommendations for improving patient careand discuss limitations and future work. Importantly our workpoints directly to the human connection between patients andCHWs as an important feature in the readmission rate. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our work shows that the predictive capabilities of the classifier increases with CHW logs and SDoH survey data, highlighting the benefit of collecting this information. This is the first step in early identification of such patients so that CHWs are focusing on and providing resources to patients who will most benefit from the program.
6 General Psychopathology Factor as a Mediator Between Polysubstance Use and Lower-Order Psychopathology Constructs
Authors: Pavuluri Asha , Carrasquillo Kristiana , Zughaib Laithe , Valença Marina , Berry Michelle , Nahabedian Sophia , Chen Yunzhi , Davis Brittany , Bernat Edward
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We aim to develop an understanding of how polysubstance use (PSU) relates to the general psychopathology factor (p-factor), as well as to individual components of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model (e.g., fear, distress). This insight can help identify treatment targets related to substance use and psychopathology. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Psychopathology and substance use data, collected at a Baltimore treatment center over several years, will be analyzed. The center aids about 6000 underserved clients per year, and the population is primarily African American clients of all genders. Structural equation modeling (using Mplus software) will be used to develop the latent models and identify relationships between psychopathology and PSU (i.e., direct and indirect pathways). The current latent HiTOP model was developed from symptom checklists completed upon entry at the treatment center. The PSU latent factor will be developed from a biopsychosocial assessment where clients list their drug of choice. Due to the varying organizations of the datasets, smaller-scale preliminary models will be developed to ensure an accurate large-scale final model. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Current models being tested are derived from January to September 2023 data (i.e., completed months' data), with an N of 1,564. From symptom checklist data collected at the treatment center, a preliminary HiTOP model was derived with reasonable fit (χ2 = 4532.35 (df = 321, p<.001), CFI = .77, SRMR = .07, RMSEA = .09 (.089, .094)). Data analysis is being conducted to derive the PSU factor before relating PSU to the HiTOP model. Given previous work at a local treatment center (Pavuluri etal., 2022) and with the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication data, we expect all positive direct relationships, negative indirect relationships between internalizing factors (fear and distress) and PSU when accounting for p-factor, and a positive indirect relationship between antagonism and PSU when accounting for p-factor. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Given our previous work to develop such models, we want to establish proof of concept in alarger treatment center population. This confirmation will help provide a path towards conducting therapeutic trials to target psychopathology when treating substance use given the shared relations, some of which are less understood (e.g., fear and PSU).
324 An umbrella protocol that establishes an enterprise-wide framework for the operation of a Clinical Data Warehouse
Authors: Garofalo Daniella , Orechwa Allison , Bahroos Neil
Published: April 2024

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To streamline the standards and procedures for operating a research-specific, clinical data warehouse, acheived by defining roles, introducing a common language, and categorizing dataset types to provide transparency regarding data security risks inherent in the use of patient data. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We established a Bioethics committee responsible for ensuring clinical data is securely procured, maintained, and extracted in a manner that adheres to all federal, state, and local laws. We created an operational framework in the form of an umbrella IRB protocol and shared it with the bioethics committee for feedback and approval. The protocol was approved first by the bioethics committee and subsequently by the IRB. It was then disseminated across the institution and published online for continuous reference and use by committee members, researchers, and the data warehouse service team. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The resulting framework defined the roles of researchers, data warehouse service team members, and honest brokers; explains the procedures for accessing and securely delivering data; and lists six categories of datasets according to type and implicit risks: datasets that are preparatory for research/aggregate counts, anonymized datasets, coded datasets, limited datasets, identified datasets for recruitment purposes, and defined identified cohort datasets. The protocol is approved and in use enterprise-wide, has reduced the number of questions from stakeholders, and has given researchers, IRB members, and informatics staff confidence in the use of the clinical research data warehouse. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: We offer our framework to CTSAs interested in streamlining their data warehouse operations. We believe the adoption of this framework will establish strong procedures for ensuring compliance with IRB requirements, data privacy, and data security while reducing barriers to clinical research.