bluuebunny/crossref_metadata_2025 huggingface dataset:
Impact of antibiotic use on clinical outcomes in patients with urothelial cancer receiving a programmed death protein 1 or programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/L1) antibody.
Authors: Weinstock Chana , Maher Virginia Ellen , Fernandes Laura L , Tang Shenghui , Agrawal Sundeep , Brave Michael Holman , Ning Yang-Min , Singh Harpreet , Suzman Daniel L. , Xu James , Goldberg Kirsten B. , Sridhara Rajeshwari , Ibrahim Amna , Theoret Marc Robert , Beaver Julia A. , Pazdur Richard
Published: May 2019

4557

Background: Previous data has suggested that patients treated with anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies who receive antibiotics during their therapy might have dramatically decreased progression-free and overall survival 1,2. This has clinical implications for management of patients with suspected bacterial infection while on treatment with these agents. We assessed the relationship between antibiotic use and tumor response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in a large dataset of patients with urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies. Methods: We examined seven trials that led to drug approval and which included 1747 patients with metastatic or locally advanced urothelial cancer treated with an anti-PD-1/L1 antibody. Five trials enrolled patients who had received prior platinum-based therapy and two enrolled patients who were cisplatin-ineligible. Six were single arm trials and one was a randomized controlled trial whose control arm is not included in these analyses. Concomitant medication datasets were searched for systemic antibiotic used by each patient while on treatment. Results: Overall, 51% of patients (n=892) were exposed to antibiotics (ABX+) and 49% (n=855) were not exposed (ABX-). In these exploratory analyses, small numeric differences in OS, PFS, and ORR were seen in ABX+ vs. ABX- patients. Median OS was 9.23 vs. 9.86 months, median PFS was 105 vs 101 days, and ORR was 20% vs. 21% in ABX+ vs. ABX- patients, respectively. Conclusions: Patients who were treated with antibiotics while on therapy with an anti-PD-1/L1 antibody for urothelial cancer had similar outcomes to those who were not treated with antibiotics. Numeric differences in outcomes were not significant and did not duplicate previous analysis demonstrating a median OS that was doubled in ABX- patients1. Our exploratory analyses do not appear to demonstrate a clear need for practitioners to avoid antibiotic use in patients treated with PD-1/L1 agents for fear of significantly impacting clinical outcomes. References: 1) Tinsley et. al., ASCO annual meeting 2018, abstract 3010 2) Routy et. al., Science 05 Jan 2018: Vol. 359, Issue 6371. [Table: see text]
Phase I/II study of axitinib (axi) and nivolumab (nivo) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
Authors: Zibelman Matthew R. , Geynisman Daniel M. , Molina Ana M. , Malizzia Lois , Devarajan Karthik , Luong Diana , Sullivan Elizabeth , Carducci Michael Anthony , Plimack Elizabeth R.
Published: May 2019

4567

Background: Drug combinations targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the programmed death one (PD-1) pathway have demonstrated encouraging efficacy in patients (pts) with mRCC. We are conducting a phase I/II trial combining the VEGF-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) axi and the PD-1 inhibitor nivo in mRCC pts. Methods: The phase I portion of this investigator-initiated, multi-center trial enrolled pts with TKI-refractory mRCC (any line) and no prior anti-PD-1. It used a 3+3 design, with axi dosing starting at 3 mg orally BID, escalating to a target dose of5 mg BID. Nivo dosing was fixed at 240 mg IV Q2 weeks or 480 mg Q4 weeks. Eligible pts received axi alone for a one week induction, followed by combination dosing. There was a 4 week period to assess for dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). The primary endpoint for phase I was safety and establishment of a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for axi. Safety and early efficacy data for the phase I cohort are presented. Results: Twelve pts received treatment during the phase I portion, with all evaluable for toxicity. Ten were 2nd line and 2 were 3rd line or beyond. One DLT was noted in the first cohort of three pts (grade 3 autoimmune disorder), thus that cohort was expanded. No further DLTs were reported at axi 3 mg BID, or at further expansion to 5 mg BID. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) at least possibly related to one of the drugs included expected side effects HTN, hyperglycemia, and transaminitis. One patient received steroids for an immune related AE (grade 3 transaminitis) that resolved to grade 1 with steroids. No grade 4-5 AEs occurred. Axi at 5 mg BID was chosen as the RP2D. With 10 pts evaluable for efficacy, 4 pts had partial responses, 4 pts had stable disease, and 2 had progressive disease. Updated efficacy data will be presented. Conclusions: The phase I portion of this phase I/II trial has demonstrated expected safety and established 5 mg BID as the RP2D axi dose. This ongoing VEGF TKI/PD1 trial incorporating two drugs already approved for mRCC pts has shown encouraging signs of efficacy and has now expanded to include treatment naïve pts in addition to TKI-refractory pts as part of phase II. Clinical trial information: NCT03172754.
TIVO-3: Subgroup analysis of progression-free survival of tivozanib compared to sorafenib in subjects with refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Authors: Porta Camillo , Verzoni Elena , Escudier Bernard , Pal Sumanta K. , Atkins Michael B. , Hutson Thomas E. , Needle Michael N. , McDermott David F. , Rini Brian I.
Published: May 2019

4572

Background: Tivozanib (T) is a biochemically potent and highly selective VEGF tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor in clinical development in RCC. The TIVO-3 trial in 3rd and 4th line subjects with metastatic (m) RCC showed a median progression free survival (mPFS) of 5.6 months (mos) for T compared to 3.9 mos for sorafenib (S) (p = 0.017, HR = 0.73). Methods: Subjects with mRCC who failed 2 or 3 prior systemic regimens, one of which included a VEGFR TKI other than S or T, were stratified by IMDC risk category and type of prior therapy (two TKIs; TKI plus checkpoint; TKI + other) then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to T or S. The primary objective was to compare PFS by blinded independent radiological review. Pre-specified subgroups included prior treatment, IMDC prognostic group, and demographic characteristics. Results: Tivozanib demonstrated PFS benefit in all subgroups including men, women, patients over 65, and under 65. The hazard ratio was the same for patients enrolled in North America and the EU. Patients with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 had a lower HR than patients with ECOG PS of 1. There was an increase in HR from IMDC favorable vs IMDC intermediate vs IMDC poor. PFS favored tivozanib in patients who had two prior lines of therapy, those treated with three prior lines, those with a prior checkpoint inhibitor, or with two prior VEGFR TKIs. Conclusions: Tivozanib improved PFS vs. sorafenib across several subgroups in TIVO-3. Patients with favorable and intermediate IMDC risk and ECOG PS 0 seemed to derive the most benefit. Patients treated with a prior checkpoint inhibitor or two VEGFR-TKIs had a longer PFS than patients treated on sorafenib. Clinical trial information: NCT02627963. [Table: see text]
Adjuvant axitinib dose modification in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Analysis of the ATLAS study.
Authors: Quinn David I. , Kwon Tae Gyun , Eto Masatoshi , Ye Dingwei , Miyake Hideaki , Seo Seong Il , Byun Seok-Soo , Lee Jae-Lyun , Master Viraj A. , Ng Chi-Fai , Linke Rolf Gerhard , Rosbrook Brad , Thakur Mahgull Nazar , Grande Enrique , Gross-Goupil Marine , Chang Chao-Hsiang
Published: May 2019

4573

Background: The ATLAS trial compared axitinib vs placebo in patients (pts) with locoregional RCC at risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. ATLAS was stopped due to futility at a pre-planned interim analysis; results showed no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between the treatment arms. We explored whether pts treated longer with axitinib achieved better outcomes and the impact of axitinib dose reduction or increase on DFS – the trial required dose reduction for toxicity and allowed dose escalation in the event of no or minimal toxicity. Methods: Pts in ATLAS received a maximum of 3 y of study treatment. A landmark analysis was conducted comparing pts treated with axitinib ≤1 y vs > 1 y. Pts who recurred or censored prior to 1 y were excluded. An analysis of daily dose characteristics was undertaken to compare patients whose dose was reduced and whose dose was increased to those with a stable dose of axitinib. Cox proportional hazard model was used for DFS analysis. Toxicity analysis using a 90-day landmark was also conducted. Results: Overall, 264 axitinib-treated pts were included in this analysis. Of these 42 pts were treated for ≤1 y and 222 pts for > 1 y. Pts remaining on axitinib > 1 y vs ≤1 y did not have different DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.572, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.247–1.327, P= 0.1874). Pts with dose reduction had longer DFS than those with a stable dose (HR = 0.458, CI: 0.305–0.687, P= 0.0001). Pts with dose increase did not have DFS different to stable dose pts (HR = 1.936, CI: 0.937–3.997, P= 0.0685). No difference in DFS in pts experiencing grade ≥2 adverse events (AEs) vs grade < 2 AEs within 90 d of start of treatment was observed (HR = 0.885, CI: 0.419–1.869, P= 0.7488). Pts experiencing grade ≥3 AEs within 90 d of start of treatment had shorter DFS compared to those that did not (HR = 1.643, CI: 0.963–2.801, P= 0.0653). Conclusions: DFS did not vary based on duration of axitinib treatment, however, pts with dose reductions had longer DFS vs pts with stable dose or dose increases. This difference suggests that there is a relation between axitinib exposure and DFS as seen with sunitinib in the advanced setting and pazopanib in the PROTECT study.
Interest of short hormonotherapy (HT) associated with radiotherapy (RT) as salvage treatment for metastatic free survival (MFS) after radical prostatectomy (RP): Update at 9 years of the GETUG-AFU 16 phase III randomized trial (NCT00423475).
Authors: Carrie Christian , Magné Nicolas , Burban-Provost Patricia , Sargos Paul , Latorzeff Igor , Supiot Stephane , Belkacemi Yazid , Peiffert Didier , Allouache Nedla , Dubray Bernard M. , Servagi Vernat Stephanie , Suchaud Jean-Philippe , Crehange Gilles , Guerif Stéphane , Brihoum Meryem , Barbier Nicolas , Graff-Cailleaud Pierre , Ruffion Alain , Chabaud Sylvie
Published: May 2019

5001

Background: RT is the standard salvage treatment after RP. The role of HT is not formally demonstrated to date. This trial assessed the efficacy of RT alone vs RT+HT in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), metastase-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with biological relapse (BR) after RP. After a median follow-up (FU) duration of 5.3 years, we previously reported [Carrie C, Lancet Oncol 2016] a benefit in PFS (80% vs 62% PFS free at 5 years; p < 0.0001) in the combined arm, whatever the risk subgroups. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomized (1:1) to RT alone or RT+HT (goserelin, for 6 months). The randomization was stratified according to radiotherapy modality and risk group. Low risk was defined as Gleason score < 8, surgical margins+, psa doubling time > 8 months and no seminal vesicle involment. Assuming a 45% 5-year PFS of 45% in the RT arm, the trial required 369 pts per arm to detect an improvement of 12% on PFS in RT+HT arm (90% power and 5% bilateral alpha risk), possibly translating into a 10% gain in OS (75% to 85% with 80% power). Biological relapse (BR) was defined according to ASTRO-consensus. Results: At the time of data cutoff (March 2019), the median duration follow-up was 112 months. We confirm the benefit of RT+HT on PFS (HR = 0.54 [CI95% = 0.43-0.68] ; p < 0.0001) whatever the risk subgroup (HR = 0.47 [CI95% = 0.28-0.80] and 0.56 [CI95% = 0.44-0.73] for low and high risk patients, respectively. Metastatic free survival (MFS) is significantly improved in the combined arm (HR = 0.73 [CI95% = 0.54-0.98] ; p = 0.034) with 69% [CI95% = 63-74] versus 75% [CI95% = 70-80] of MFS at 10 years for RT alone and RT+HT, respectively. Conclusions: Salvage radiotherapy combined with short term HT significantly improved 10-years metastatic free survival compared with salvage radiotherapy alone. GETUG-16 considered in the context of previously published results from RTOG-9601, confirm that this strategy can be considered as the new standard for salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy. Clinical trial information: NCT00423475.
Alliance A031201: A phase III trial of enzalutamide (ENZ) versus enzalutamide, abiraterone, and prednisone (ENZ/AAP) for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Authors: Morris Michael J. , Heller Glenn , Bryce Alan Haruo , Armstrong Andrew J. , Beltran Himisha , Hahn Olwen Mary , McGary Eric C. , Mehan Paul Tracy , Goldkorn Amir , Roth Bruce J. , Xiao Han , Watt Colleen , Hillman David W. , Taplin Mary-Ellen , Ryan Charles J. , Halabi Susan , Small Eric Jay
Published: May 2019

5008

Background: Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is an important growth mechanism in mCRPC, providing the rationale for treatment with AR axis inhibitors such as ENZ and AAP. Targeting AR with anti-androgens such as ENZ can result in compensatory autocrine and paracrine androgenic stimulation. Therefore, using ENZ with the androgen biosynthesis inhibitor AAP to dampen these resistance mechanisms could improve clinical outcomes relative to ENZ alone. Methods: Men with progressive mCRPC by Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria were eligible. Prior treatment with taxanes for mCRPC and any prior treatment with ENZ or AAP was exclusionary. Patients (pts) were randomized 1:1 to ENZ or ENZ/AAP at standard FDA-approved doses. Randomization was stratified by prior chemotherapy and Halabi prognostic three risk groups. Castrating therapy was maintained. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) defined as the date of randomization from date of death or last follow-up. The log-rank test had 90% power to detect a hazard ratio for OS of 0.77 with a one-sided type I error rate of 0.025. Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) and on-treatment PSA declines. Exploratory endpoints included imaging changes, and changes in serum biomarkers such as androgens, angiokines, and circulating microRNA and RNA. The primary analysis was based on the stratified log-rank test adjusting on the stratification factors. Results: Between January 2014 and August 2016, 1311 men were randomized: 657 to ENZ and 654 to ENZ/AAP. Groups were well balanced between arms, including stratification variables. 15.6% of pts were high risk, 35.3% intermediate, and 48.1% low. Median OS was 33.6 mo (95% CI 30.5-36.4) and 32.7 mo (29.9-35.4) respectively, two-sided p = 0.53. Fifty percent PSA decline rate was 80% vs. 76.5%. Grade 3-5 adverse events (AE) (all attributions) were 55.6% and 68.8% respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 5% and 12%, pt withdrawal in 5% and 13%, and progression or death in 57% and 48% of pts respectively. Conclusions: Addition of abiraterone acetate to enzalutamide did not prolong survival in men with mCRPC. The combination resulted in more AEs than enzalutamide alone. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT01949337.
Docetaxel, trastuzumab, pertuzumab versus trastuzumab emtansine as neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: Results from the Swedish PREDIX HER2 trial identifying a new potential de-escalation standard?
Authors: Bergh Jonas C. S. , Andersson Anne , Bjohle Judith , Bosch Ana , Carlsson Lena , Dreifaldt Ann Charlotte , Einbeigi Zakaria , Fredholm Hanna , Isaksson-Friman Erika , Foukakis Theodoros , Elinder Ellinor , Hellstrom Mats , Johansson Hemming , Lekberg Tobias , Lindman Henrik , Maes Claudia , Brandberg Yvonne , Hatschek Thomas
Published: May 2019

501

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy produces high rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and is the standard of care in HER2 positive breast cancer; however, the optimal treatment regimen remains to be established. Methods: In this randomized phase II study patients ≥18 years with HER2 positive breast cancer > 20mm or verified lymph node metastases were randomized to 6 courses of docetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (DTP, group A) or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, group B), q 21 days. The protocol allowed switch to the competing treatment upon lack of response or drug-related severe toxicity. Patients received postoperative epirubicin+cyclophosphamide, trastuzumab for a total of one year and endocrine therapy. Accrual was completed in October 2018 after randomization of 202 patients, data on pCR were available for 190 at the time for this abstract submission. Median age, 52 years (26-74), menopausal status, histological type and grade were well balanced between the treatment groups. 62.6% of the tumors were hormone receptor (HR) positive. Results: Primary endpoint was pathological objective response. 190 patients completed the protocol-specified preoperative treatment. pCR was achieved in 45.3% of patients, 46.4% in patients treated with DTP and 44.1% with T-DM1 (chi-sq., p = 0.75). In HR-positive tumors, pCR was obtained in 35.3% of patients, 35.9% in group A vs. 34.6% in group B (p = 0.87); in HR-negative tumors, the overall pCR rate was 62.0%, 66.7% in group A vs. 57.9% in group B (p = 0.45). Severe (grade 3/4) toxicity was reported at 68 occasions related to DTP, compared with 16 related to T-DM1, 26 vs. 3 caused by febrile neutropenia. Significantly better quality of life was reported by patients treated with T-DM1. Conclusions: Our data on TDM-1 demonstrates similar efficacy and less toxicity, in particular for patients with HER2 and HR positive cancers, being a potential new standard for neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02568839.
Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus enzalutamide (enza) in abiraterone (abi)-pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Cohort C of the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study.
Authors: Fong Peter C.C. , Retz Margitta , Drakaki Alexandra , Massard Christophe , Berry William R. , Romano Emanuela , De Bono Johann S. , Feyerabend Susan , Appleman Leonard Joseph , Conter Henry Jacob , Sridhar Srikala S. , Shore Neal D. , Linch Mark David , Joshua Anthony M. , Gurney Howard , Wu Helen , Schloss Charles , Poehlein Christian Heinrich , Yu Evan Y.
Published: May 2019

5010

Background: Pembro has activity as monotherapy in pts with pretreated advanced mCRPC. A phase 2 study suggested that pembro + enza after progression on enza may have clinical activity. Data from cohort C (pembro + enza) of KEYNOTE-365 (NCT02861573), a phase 1b/2 umbrella study to test combinations in mCRPC, are presented. Methods: Pts who were unsuccessful with or became intolerant to ≥4 weeks of abi in the prechemotherapy mCRPC state, with either PSA or radiologic progression within 6 mo before screening were included. Pts received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W with enza 160 mg/day orally. Primary end points were safety and PSA response rate (confirmed PSA decrease ≥50%). Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed ORR (RECIST v1.1), disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+SD ≥6 mo), time to PSA progression, rPFS, and OS. Results: 69 pts began treatment (median age, 69 y; visceral disease, 26%; measurable disease, 36%). Median (95% CI) follow-up was 9 (7-13) mo. Efficacy is outlined in the table. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 63 (91%) pts; most frequent (≥20%) were fatigue (30%), rash (23%), and nausea (22%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 28 (41%) pts; most common was rash (10%); no deaths were from treatment-related AEs. Conclusions: The pembro + enza combination showed sustained activity in abi-pretreated chemotherapy-naive mCRPC. AEs were considered tolerable for the treatment combination; incidence of rash resolved with standard-of-care treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT02861573. [Table: see text]
Copy number analysis to identify tumor suppressor genes associated with enzalutamide (Enza) resistance and poor prognosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.
Authors: Guan Xiangnan , Sun Duan-Chen , Lu Eric , Urrutia Joshua A. , Reiter Robert Evan , Rettig Matthew , Evans Christopher P. , Lara Primo , Gleave Martin , Beer Tomasz M. , Thomas George V. , Huang Jiaoti , Xia Zheng , Alumkal Joshi J.
Published: May 2019

5011

Background: Although enza prolongs life in mCRPC pts, the development of drug resistance and subsequent disease progression is nearly universal. Seeking to clarify molecular mechanisms that underlie enza resistance, we analyzed whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing (seq) of tumors obtained from patients with enza-naive or -resistant mCRPC. Methods: One hundred and one men with mCRPC who underwent image-guided biopsy and subsequent WGS were included (n = 64 with enza-naive and n = 37 with enza-resistant mCRPC). The differential copy number alteration (CNA) events enriched in enza-resistant vs. naïve samples were determined, and the prognostic significance of differential CNAs was assessed. RNA-seq data were evaluated to confirm that CNAs correlated with changes in gene expression of relevant loci and to identify potentially druggable targets selectively activated in tumors with specific CNAs. Results: Copy number loss was more common than gain in enza-resistant tumors. Specifically, we identified 123 protein-coding genes that were more commonly lost in enza-resistant samples—eight of which were previously described tumor suppressor genes. There was a strong concordance of copy number loss and reduced mRNA expression of these genes. We identified one gene from this list of eight genes whose copy number loss was associated with poor overall survival (median overall survival from date of CRPC was 19.1 months in tumors with gene loss vs. 42.0 months in intact tumors, hazard ratio 3.8 [1.46–9.8], log-rank p = 0.003). Finally, Master Regulator analysis determined that tumors with copy number loss of this poor prognosis gene had activation of several potentially targetable factors, including the kinases Akt and PLK1. Conclusions: Copy number loss of specific tumor suppressor genes is associated with enza resistance in mCRPC patients. Previously unappreciated molecular subsets of enza-resistant CRPC were identified, including one subset associated with poor clinical outcome.
HER2 heterogeneity as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant T-DM1 plus pertuzumab: Results from a prospective clinical trial.
Authors: Metzger Filho Otto , Viale Giuseppe , Trippa Lorenzo , Li Tianyu , Yardley Denise A. , Mayer Ingrid A. , Abramson Vandana Gupta , Arteaga Carlos L. , Spring Laura , Waks Adrienne Gropper , Janiszewska Michalina , Wrabel Eileen , Demeo Michelle , Bardia Aditya , King Tari A. , Polyak Kornelia , Winer Eric P. , Krop Ian E.
Published: May 2019

502

Background: HER2 targeted therapy without chemotherapy may be insufficient to completely eradicate a HER2+ cancer in cases of significant intratumor HER2 heterogeneity (ITH-HER2). Methods: We conducted a single-arm phase II study enrolling centrally confirmed HER2+ breast cancer. Pts received 6 cycles of T-DM1 plus Pertuzumab before surgery. Central ITH-HER2 was assessed on baseline ultrasound-guided core biopsies from 2 distinct areas of each tumor (3 cores/site). ITH-HER2 was defined as at least one of the six areas demonstrating either 1) HER2 positivity by FISH in > 5% and < 50% of tumor cells (i.e., CAP guideline) or 2) an area of tumor that tested HER2 negative. The primary objective is the association between pathologic complete response (pCR) and ITH, stratified by ER status. pCR defined as residual cancer burden (RCB) 0. Results: 164 pts with centrally confirmed HER2+ tumors were enrolled from 1/2015 to 1/2018. 2 pts withdrew consent. Median tumor size by imaging was 2.8 cm (IQR 2.1-3.8cm); 111 (69%) were ER+ and 51 (32%) ER-. 8 pts discontinued tx (6 due to disease progression, 2 due to toxicity). 49% of pts had a pCR (RCB-0), 14% RCB-I, 26% RCB-II and 11% RCB-III. Higher rates of RCB-0 were seen in ER- (65%) versus ER+ (42%). ITH-HER2 was detected in 10% (16/157) of evaluable cases. No pCR was observed among cases classified as heterogeneous (RCB-I 25%, RCB-II 25%, RCB-III 50%). The study met its primary endpoint by demonstrating a significant association between ITH-HER2 and pCR stratified by ER status (p < .0001). Secondary analysis also demonstrated a significant association between ITH-HER2 and pathologic response defined as RCB 0 or I (OR = 5.6, p = 0.004). Exploratory analysis revealed higher rates of RCB-0 among tumors centrally classified as HER2 3+ (56% [66/118]) versus HER2 2+ (27% [10/37]), (OR = 3.4, p = 0.002). The association of ITH-HER2 and pCR was maintained when stratifying by ER status and HER2 IHC (2+ vs. 3+), (p = 0.002). Conclusions: ITH-HER2 assessed by routine pathology evaluation is a strong predictor of pCR to a dual-HER2 targeted therapy regimen. If validated, ITH-HER2 may need to be considered in selection of pts for HER2-targeted regimens without chemotherapy in the curative setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02326974.
Concurrent or layered treatment with radium-223 (Ra-223) and enzalutamide (Enza) or abiraterone plus prednisone/prednisolone (Abi/pred): A retrospective study of real-world clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Authors: Shore Neal D. , Sartor A. Oliver , Sternberg Cora N. , Saad Fred , Tombal Bertrand F. , Miller Kurt , Kalinovsky Jan , Jiao XiaoLong , Tangirala Krishna , Higano Celestia S.
Published: May 2019

5026

Background: In clinical practice, Ra-223 is often combined with Enza or Abi/pred. ERA 223 (NCT02043678) showed increased fracture risk with concurrent Ra-223+Abi/pred. We assessed real-world symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) and overall survival (OS) of pts with mCRPC who received concurrent or layered Ra-223+Enza or Abi/pred. Methods: Patients with mCRPC treated with Ra-223 in US cancer clinics from 1/01/2013 to 6/30/2017 were identified from a Flatiron prostate cancer registry of electronic health records. Treatment initiation defined subgroups: concurrent (both started within 30 days) or layered (1 started ≥30 days after the other). Baseline (BL) was the first dose of Ra-223. Descriptive analysis was performed for BL characteristics, SSEs, and OS (Kaplan–Meier). Results: Of 625 pts treated with Ra-223, 48% received Ra-223+Enza or Abi/pred. Layered treatment was more common (73%) than concurrent (27%). BL characteristics and clinical outcomes were summarized [Table]. Conclusions: In a real-world setting, Ra-223+Enza or Abi/pred treatment was mainly layered. SSE rates with layered vs concurrent Ra-223+Abi/pred varied between subgroups; results must be treated cautiously given small pt numbers and a non-randomized study. The ongoing PEACE III trial is investigating concurrent Ra-223+Enza; a Phase III study (ESCALATE) exploring layered Ra-223+Enza is planned. [Table: see text]
Impact of clinical risk category on prognosis and prediction of chemotherapy benefit in early breast cancer (EBC) by age and the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in TAILORx.
Authors: Sparano Joseph A. , Gray Robert James , Makower Della F. , Lively Tracy G. , Saphner Thomas James , Keane Maccon M. , Gomez Henry Leonidas , Reddy Pavan S. , Goggins Timothy F. , Mayer Ingrid A. , Toppmeyer Deborah , Brufsky Adam , Goetz Matthew P. , Hayes Daniel F. , Dees Elizabeth Claire , Pritchard Kathleen I. , Geyer Charles E. , Olson John A. , Albain Kathy S. , Sledge George W.
Published: May 2019

503

Background: TAILORx established that endocrine therapy (ET) alone is non-inferior to adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) plus ET in EBC and a 21-gene RS of 11-25, with some benefit if ≤50 years (y) with RS 16-25 (PMID: 29860917). We evaluated whether clinical risk (tumor size & histologic grade) provides additional prognostic information to RS, a secondary trial objective. Methods: Clinical risk by was assessed by Adjuvant! (version 8.0) using MINDACT criteria (PMID 27557300), defined as low clinical risk (LCR - tumor ≤3 cm and low grade, <2 cm and intermediate grade, or ≤1 cm and high grade) or high clinical risk (HCR -not meeting LCR criteria). Results: Of 9427 women with RS and clinical risk information, 70% were LCR and 30% HCR, with comparable distribution by age ( ≤50 vs. >50). The RS was 26-100 in 9% of LCR and 27% of HCR patients, with similar distributions by age. Although LCR/HCR provided additional prognostic information in each RS category for iDFS, including RS 0-10 (9-year rates 86.7% vs. 75.7% LCR vs. HCR), 11-25 (85.4% vs. 78.9%), and 26-100 (82.0% vs. 70.4%), iDFS rates were similar irrespective of CT (no vs. yes) in the entire RS 11-25 cohort whether LCR (85.8% vs. 85.1%) or HCR (79.8% vs. 77.9%). DRFI rates were also similar irrespective of CT in the RS 11-25 cohort or > 50y group whether LCR (96.0% vs. 96.1% overall; 96.5% vs. 96.0% > 50y) or HCR (92.3% vs. 89.9% overall; 91.7% vs. 90.7% >50y). For women ≤50y, the absolute reduction in distant recurrence from CT with a RS of 16-20 (N=923) was -0.2% (standard error [SE]±2.1%) for LCR vs. 6.5%(SE±4.9%) for HCR (vs. 1.6%[SE±1.9%] overall), whereas for a RS 21-25 (N=492) it was 6.4% (SE±4.9%) for LCR vs. 8.6% (SE±6.2%) for HCR (vs. 6.5%[SE±3.7%] overall). Conclusions: Clinical risk stratification provides additional prognostic information to the 21-gene RS, but not prediction of CT benefit in the overall TAILORx population or those > 50y, and facilitates more refined estimates of absolute CT benefit for women ≤50y with a RS 16-25. (Funded by National Cancer Institute, Komen Foundation, Breast Cancer Research Foundation). Clinical trial information: NCT00310180.
Genomic characteristics of deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations and associations with baseline clinical factors in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) enrolled in TRITON2.
Authors: Abida Wassim , Bryce Alan Haruo , Vogelzang Nicholas J. , Amato Robert J. , Percent Ivor John , Shapiro Jeremy David , McDermott Raymond S. , Hussain Arif , Patnaik Akash , Petrylak Daniel Peter , Ryan Charles J. , Stanton Thomas S. , Zhang Jingsong , Loehr Andrea , Simmons Andrew , Despain Darrin , Golsorkhi Anthony A. , Watkins Simon Paul , Scher Howard I. , Chowdhury Simon
Published: May 2019

5031

Background: The phase 2 TRITON2 study (NCT02952534) is evaluating the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with mCRPC who have a deleterious germline or somatic alteration in BRCA ( BRCA1 or BRCA2) or 1 of 13 other DNA damage repair genes. Here we present analyses of tumor genomics and baseline clinical characteristics in mCRPC patients with a deleterious alteration in BRCA. Methods: Plasma (baseline) and tissue (archival or baseline) samples from patients with a deleterious alteration in BRCA were analyzed using Foundation Medicine next-generation sequencing assays. The alterations and zygosity of the alterations that were detected, as well as the somatic/germline status from Color Genomics testing, were summarized. Associations between genomic alterations, DNA yield, allele frequency, and baseline clinical characteristics were investigated. Results: Results are shown in the Table for a cohort of 40 BRCA2 and 5 BRCA1 patients enrolled in TRITON2 (Abida W et al. Presented at ESMO 2018. Abst 793PD). A biallelic alteration was observed in 21 of the 22 BRCA2 patients (95%) for whom alteration zygosity could be determined. Among the 5 BRCA1 patients, 1 alteration was monoallelic and 4 were of unknown zygosity. Co-occurring alterations in cancer-related or DNA damage repair genes were observed in many patients with BRCA alterations. At baseline, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) yield correlated positively with the sum of target lesions (STL; P= 0.04), but not with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ( P= 0.86). No correlation was observed between allele frequency of the BRCA alteration baseline STL ( P= 0.68) or PSA levels ( P= 0.97). Conclusions: Patients with a BRCA mutation enrolled in TRITON2 demonstrate a profile of genomic alterations consistent with that of prior studies of patients with mCRPC. Plasma cfDNA profiling showed a correlation between baseline cfDNA yield and measurable tumor burden, but not baseline PSA. Clinical trial information: NCT02952534. [Table: see text]
Personalized peptide vaccination for castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel chemotherapy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial.
Authors: Noguchi Masanori , Fujimoto Kiyohide , Arai Gaku , Uemura Hiroji , Hashine Katsuyoshi , Matsumoto Hiroaki , Fukasawa Satoshi , Nakatsu Hideomi , Takenaka Atsushi , Fujisawa Masato , Uemura Hirotsugu , Naito Seiji , Egawa Shin , Fujimoto Hiroyuki , Hinotsu Shiro , Itoh Kyogo , Kohjimoto Yasuo
Published: May 2019

5033

Background: To develop a new treatment modality, we conducted a phase III randomized trial of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) -A24 positive patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who failed docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive PPV or placebo. Four of 12 warehouse peptides selected based on preexisting peptide-specific immunoglobulin G levels or the corresponding placebo were subcutaneously injected 6 doses weekly followed the maximum of 30 doses bi-weekly until disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and immune responses. Results: From August 2013 to April 2016, 310 patients were randomly assigned (207 to PPV and 103 to placebo), and 306 patients were analyzed by the full analysis set (204 to PPV and 102 to placebo). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Estimated median OS was 16.1 months (95% CI, 13 to 18.2) with PPV and 16.9 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 20.4) with placebo (HR, 1.04; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.37; P = 0.77). Median PFS was also not significantly different among them. Median Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 41% in both groups. The analysis of treatment arm effects among various subgroups revealed a lower HR for OS in favor of the PPV arm in patients with a < 64% neutrophil proportion (HR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.33 to 0.93), with a significant interaction test ( P = 0.003). Conclusions: PPV did not prolong either OS or PFS in HLA-A24 positive patients with CRPC progressing after docetaxel chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: 0000113088.
Phase 1 study of pasotuxizumab (BAY 2010112), a PSMA-targeting Bispecific T cell Engager (BiTE) immunotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Authors: Hummel Horst-Dieter , Kufer Peter , Grüllich Carsten , Deschler-Baier Barbara , Chatterjee Manik , Goebeler Maria-Elisabeth , Miller Kurt , De Santis Maria , Loidl Wolfgang C. , Buck Andreas , Wittemer-Rump Sabine , Koca Goekben , Boix Oliver , Doecke Wolf-Dietrich , Stienen Sabine , Sayehli Cyrus , Bargou Ralf C.
Published: May 2019

5034

Background: mCRPC has a poor prognosis and immunotherapies are largely ineffective. PSMA is a promising therapeutic target in mCRPC, and pasotuxizumab is a PSMA x CD3 BiTE that mediates tumor cell killing. Methods: NCT01723475 was a first-in-human, multicenter, dose-escalation study in patients (pts) with mCRPC refractory to standard therapy. Pts received pasotuxizumab as a continuous intravenous infusion in cohorts of 3–4 pts. Dose-escalation followed a continuous reassessment methodology design. The primary objective was to determine safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD); secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, biomarkers, and tumor response. Results: 16 pts were enrolled into 5 dosing cohorts (5 µg/d, n = 3; 10 µg/d, n = 4; 20 µg/d, n = 3; 40 µg/d, n = 4; 80 µg/d, n = 2). All pts had ≥1 AE of any grade; most common were fever (94%), chills (69%), and fatigue (50%). 13 pts (81%) had ≥1 AE of grade ≥3; most common were decreased lymphocytes and infections (both 44%). No grade 5 AE occurred. A serious AE related to study drug was reported for 1 pt (fatigue, 20 µg/d). No anti-drug antibodies were observed. Recruitment was stopped before MTD was reached to facilitate initiation of a new study sponsored by Amgen. Antitumor activity as indicated by PSA serum level decline was dose dependent, with a mean best PSA change per dosing cohort versus baseline of +0.74% (5 µg/d), –17.9% (10 µg/d), –37.4% (20 µg/d), –42.5% (40 µg/d) and –54.9% (80 µg/d). PSA decreases of ≥50% occurred in 3 pts (n = 1 each in 20 µg/d, 40 µg/d, and 80 µg/d cohorts). One long-term PSA responder was treated for 14 months (40 µg/d) and one for 19.4 months (80 µg/d). The latter pt showed a complete regression of soft-tissue metastases and marked regression of bone metastases as assessed by PSMA-PET/CT, > 90% reduction in PSA and alkaline phosphatase, and a significant and durable improvement in disease related symptoms. Conclusions: Pasotuxizumab had an acceptable safety profile and dose-dependent clinical activity in mCRPC pts. There were two long term responders in the dose escalation. This is the first clinical study showing that a BiTE immunotherapy can be efficacious in solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT01723475.
Genomic landscape of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) vs. metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer (mCRPC) by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).
Authors: Hahn Andrew W , Lin Edwin , Esther John , Anderson Neysi , Rathi Nityam , Yandell Mark , Maughan Benjamin Louis , Agarwal Neeraj
Published: May 2019

5043

Background: mCRPC carries a poor prognosis, and targeted therapies have had minimal success in mCRPC. Novel genomic targets could improve drug development. To date, large ctDNA studies in metastatic prostate cancer have been descriptive with limited or no clinical annotation. Herein, we hypothesize that profiles of genomic alterations (GAs) in ctDNA not only differ significantly between, but can also be used to predict mCRPC vs. mHSPC. These findings could help identify new drug targets for mCRPC treatment. Methods: Men with mHSPC or mCRPC who underwent NGS of ctDNA using G360 (Guardant Health Inc.) at the Huntsman Cancer Institute were included. Men were classified as mCRPC or mHSPC (patients with current or no prior ADT). G360 detects somatic mutations in selected exons of 73 genes, amplifications in 18 genes, and selected fusions in 6 genes. Two-sided students t-test was used to compare the %cfDNA and total GAs. The Chi squared test was used to compare the frequency of each GA. Machine learning (ML) algorithms were trained on GAs and benchmarked by cross-validated performance. GAs contributing to mCRPC vs. mHSPC classification were measured by ML feature importance (e.g. odds ratios, regression coefficients). Results: Of the 259 men included, 119 men had mHSPC and 140 had mCRPC. Men with mCRPC had more GAs (4.5 vs. 1.86, p<0.0001) and higher %cfDNA (9.56% vs. 5.02%, p=0.02). In mHSPC, there was no significant difference in the number of GAs or %cfDNA between men on ADT and those who hadn’t yet started ADT. ML algorithms used GAs to predict mCRPC with 78.1% sensitivity, 64.0% specificity, 76.7% PPV, 65.1% NPV, and 70.3% overall accuracy. mCRPC was enriched with GAs in AR, ARID1A, BRAF, BRCA2, CCNE1, CTNNB1, EGFR, FGFR1, KIT, MET, MYC, PDGFRB, PIK3CA, and TP53. Of note, many of these genes are involved in MAP/ERK signaling. Conclusions: Men with mCRPC have more GAs, higher %cfDNA, and enrichment of GAs in the MAP/ERK pathway compared to men with mHSPC. The distinct GAs seen in mCRPC represent novel therapeutic targets, especially in the MAP/ERK pathway. We also show that machine learning can differentiate mHSPC and mCRPC based on GAs detected in ctDNA.
Interim results from a phase 2 study of olaparib (without ADT) in men with biochemically-recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy, with integrated biomarker analysis.
Authors: Antonarakis Emmanuel S. , Wang Hao , Teply Benjamin A. , Kelly William Kevin , Willms Jamie , Sullivan Rana , King Serina , Marshall Catherine Handy , Lotan Tamara L.
Published: May 2019

5045

Background: Pts with biochemically-recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer after local therapy with a PSA doubling time (PSADT) of ≤6 mo are likely to develop metastases and death from their disease. We hypothesized that the PARP inhibitor olaparib would be effective as a non-hormonal therapy for biomarker-unselected pts with BCR after prostatectomy, the first study of PARP inhibition in the hormone-sensitive setting. We report pre-specified interim results from the first stage of the trial. Methods: This investigator-initiated multicenter study (NCT03047135) enrolled pts with non-metastatic BCR after prostatectomy, with a PSADT of ≤6 mo. PSA had to be ≥1.0 ng/mL, with T ≥150 ng/dL. Pts received olaparib 300 mg twice daily (without ADT), until a doubling of their PSA or metastatic progression. The primary endpoint was confirmed ≥50% PSA decline (PSA50 response). Secondary endpoints included safety, minor PSA response (1-50% reduction), and PSA progression-free survival. Integrated biomarker analyses included somatic DNA sequencing, RNA expression analysis and IHC for DNA damage markers, using prostatectomy specimens. The study was designed to enroll a biomarker-unselected population using a staged-adaptive design, with up to 50 pts. In the first stage, ≥3 PSA50 responses out of 20 pts were required to proceed to the second stage; otherwise enrichment with biomarker-selected pts would occur. Results: Between 5/2017 and 11/2018, 20 men (median age, 65) enrolled in the first stage, with a median follow-up of 6 (range, 3-16) mo. Median PSADT was 3.1 mo, and 55% had Gleason ≥8 cancers. Seven men (35%) had BRCA2/ATM mutations. Three men (15%) had PSA50 responses (all had BRCA2 muts – 2 had complete PSA responses), and 4 other men (20%) had minor PSA responses. Median PSA progression-free survival was greater in men with vs. without BRCA2/ATM muts (9 vs. 4 mo; P= 0.02). Common toxicities of olaparib included fatigue, nausea, anemia and leukopenia; 2 men required a dose reduction. Conclusions: Olaparib (without ADT) was tolerable and showed activity in hormone-sensitive BCR prostate cancer, especially in men with BRCA2 muts. Second-stage enrolment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03047135.
ARCHES: Efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with enzalutamide (ENZA) or placebo (PBO) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).
Authors: Armstrong Andrew J. , Szmulewitz Russell Zelig , Petrylak Daniel Peter , Holzbeierlein Jeffrey M. , Villers Arnauld , Azad Arun , Alcaraz Antonio , Alekseev Boris Yakovlevich , Iguchi Taro , Shore Neal D. , Rosbrook Brad , Baron Benoit , Chen Lucy F. , Stenzl Arnulf
Published: May 2019

5048

Background: ENZA has demonstrated benefit in men with metastatic and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). ARCHES assessed the efficacy of ENZA with ADT in men with mHSPC, including pre-specified subgroups based on prior therapy. Methods: ARCHES, a multinational, double-blind, Phase 3 study (NCT02677896), randomized patients (pts) with mHSPC 1:1 to ENZA (160 mg/day) + ADT or PBO + ADT, stratified by disease volume (CHAARTED criteria) and prior docetaxel (doce) use. Primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; centrally assessed radiographic progression or death within 24 weeks of treatment discontinuation). Secondary endpoints included time to initiation of new antineoplastic therapy and overall survival (OS). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: 1150 men were randomized to ENZA (n = 574) or PBO (n = 576). Overall, 63% had high-volume disease, 18% had prior doce, and 91% had prior ADT or orchiectomy (orch). Median follow-up was 14.4 mo. ENZA + ADT significantly improved rPFS (Table); significant improvements in rPFS were also reported in prior treatment subgroups. Secondary endpoints improved with ENZA + ADT (Table), with no significant impact in time to deterioration in urinary symptoms. OS data are immature. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23.6% of ENZA pts vs. 24.7% of PBO pts with no unexpected AEs. Conclusions: ENZA + ADT significantly improved rPFS and other efficacy endpoints vs. PBO + ADT in men with mHSPC. Preliminary safety analysis appears consistent with the safety profile of ENZA in previous CRPC clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896. [Table: see text]
Trans-aTTom: Breast Cancer Index for prediction of endocrine benefit and late distant recurrence (DR) in patients with HR+ breast cancer treated in the adjuvant tamoxifen—To offer more? (aTTom) trial.
Authors: Bartlett John , Sgroi Dennis , Treuner Kai , Zhang Yi , Piper Tammy , Salunga Ranelle C. , Ahmed Ikhlaaq , Basnet Kristen M , Brachtel Elena , Pirrie Sarah , Schnabel Catherine A. , Rea Daniel William ,   on behalf of the Trans-aTTom Study Group
Published: May 2019

505

Background: The aTTom study is a prospective phase III trial that randomized 6953 HR+ women to stop or continue tamoxifen (TAM) for 5 more years after completing at least 4 years of prior TAM. Results at 9 years of median follow-up demonstrated fewer breast cancer recurrences (21% vs 25%; RR= 0.86 [95% CI 0.77-0.96]; P = 0.006) and reduced breast cancer mortality (13% vs 15%; HR= 0.91 [95% CI 0.80-1.04]; P = 0.18) but increased incidence of endometrial cancer with longer TAM use (P < 0.0001). The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a gene expression–based signature that stratifies patients based on the risk of overall (0-10y) and late (post-5y) DR and predicted the likelihood of benefit from extended endocrine therapy in MA.17. This Translational aTTom (Trans-aTTom) study is a large-scale validation of the predictive ability of BCI for extended endocrine therapy (EET) benefit. Methods: Patients treated in the aTTom trial with available primary tumor tissue were eligible for this multi-institutional prospective-retrospective study. Primary and secondary endpoints were recurrence-free interval (RFI) and disease-free interval (DFI), respectively. Statistical significance level for RFI was set at 0.0336 as per statistical plan. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with time-varying coefficients were used to test the predictive activity of BCI by HoxB13/IL17BR (H/I) status (High vs Low). Likelihood ratio test based on Cox regression was used to evaluate treatment by biomarker interaction. Results: 2637 tumors were centrally assessed for ER, PR and HER2 status leading to 1822 HR+ patients analyzed (1018 N0, 583 N+). Initial results from patients with N+ disease at 12 years of median follow-up showed 287 (49%) were classified as H/I-High and 296 (51%) were classified as H/I-Low. H/I High patients showed a statistically significant benefit of 9.8% in RFI with 10y vs 5y of TAM (HR=0.35 [95% CI 0.15-0.85]; P=0.027), whereas H/I Low patients showed no benefit (-0.2% RFI; HR=1.07 [95% CI 0.69-1.65]; P=0.77). A statistically significant interaction between continuous BCI and treatment was demonstrated (P = 0.02). Conclusions: These data provide further validation and establish level 1B evidence for BCI as a predictive biomarker for preferential benefit from EET in HR+ breast cancer.