Categorized Hematologic Response to Pegcetacoplan and Correlations with Quality of Life in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: Post Hoc Analysis of Data from Phase 1b, Phase 2a, and Phase 3 Trials
Authors: Risitano Antonio , Wong Raymond S , Al-Adhami Mohammed , Chen Crystal , Peffault De Latour Regis 
Published: November 2021

Background: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a complement-mediated, hematologic disease characterized by hemolysis, anemia, and fatigue that impairs quality of life. Pegcetacoplan (PEG), a C3-inhibitor recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of PNH, controls intravascular hemolysis (IVH) and prevents extravascular hemolysis (EVH). The PADDOCK and PALOMINO trials demonstrated PEG's improvement of key hematologic and clinical parameters, including hemoglobin (Hb) level and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue score. The PEGASUS trial demonstrated that PEG was more effective than eculizumab (ECU) in improving these parameters in PNH patients with suboptimal response to prior ECU treatment.

Aims: This post hoc analysis categorized hematologic response to PEG in 3 trials: PADDOCK (phase 1b, open-label, two-cohort [NCT02588833]), PALOMINO (phase 2a, open-label, single-cohort [NCT03593200]), and PEGASUS (phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled [NCT03500549]).

Methods: PADDOCK and PALOMINO included adult complement inhibitor-naïve patients, while PEGASUS included adult patients with Hb &lt;10.5 g/dL despite ≥3 months of ECU treatment. PADDOCK was a multiple ascending dose pilot study of 2 cohorts: cohort 1 received a suboptimal PEG dose (180 mg/day subcutaneously [SQ]) for 28 days; cohort 2 received a PEG dose of 270-360 mg/day SQ for up to one year. Patients could be enrolled in both cohorts. PALOMINO patients received a PEG dose of 270-360 mg/day SQ for up to one year. PEGASUS comprised a 4-week run-in period where patients received both ECU (continued dosing regimen) and PEG (1080 mg SQ twice-weekly), 16-week randomized controlled period (PEG or ECU monotherapy), and 32-week open-label period (PEG monotherapy) including a 4-week run-in period for the ECU-to-PEG group.

Hematologic response category was assessed at Days 113/337 for patients in the combined PADDOCK/PALOMINO trials (N=24) via manual categorization by two independent, blinded observers. Categorization was assessed at Weeks 16/48 for PEGASUS patients (N=80) using SAS 9.4M5. Statistical significance for hematologic response categories within arms at Week 16 vs. 48, and between arms at Week 48, was evaluated using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Chi-square testing. FACIT-Fatigue scores for PEGASUS patients, summarized using descriptive statistics, were also correlated to hematologic response category.

Response categories were defined per the following criteria (Risitano A, et al., Front Immunol, 2019;10:1157): complete- no transfusions required, stable Hb (normal range), no evidence of hemolysis (lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]≤1.5×upper limit of normal [ULN] U/L, absolute reticulocyte count [ARC]≤150,000/µL); major- no transfusion, normal Hb, but with evidence of hemolysis (LDH&gt;1.5×ULN U/L and/or ARC&gt;150,000/µL); good- no transfusions, but with chronic mild anemia or evidence of hemolysis; partial- chronic moderate anemia and/or occasional transfusions (&lt;3 units/6 months); minor- regular transfusions required (3-6 units/6 months); no response- regular and frequent transfusions required (&gt;6 units/6 months).

PADDOCK/PALOMINO patients missing data at an assessment timepoint, or PEGASUS patients missing data within 6 weeks prior to an assessment timepoint, were not evaluated.

Results: Most PADDOCK/PALOMINO patients achieved at least a good hematologic response at Days 113 and 337 (Table 1). At Week 48, most patients in both PEGASUS arms achieved a good/major/complete hematologic response (inter-arm p=0.4390), with a significant increase in the percent of ECU-to-PEG patients achieving at least a good response after switching to PEG at Week 16 (Week 16 vs. 48: intra-arm p&lt;0.0001; Table 1). In PEGASUS, patients with better response categories had higher FACIT-Fatigue scores when compared to the rest of the cohort (Week 16: p&lt;0.001, Week 48: p=0.028; Table 2).

Conclusions: In post hoc analyses of PADDOCK, PALOMINO, and PEGASUS trial data, a substantial proportion of patients achieved and maintained good, major, or complete hematologic responses to PEG, suggesting that PEG can lead to sustained improvements in hematologic parameters. PEGASUS data also demonstrated correlation of improved hematologic response category with clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life, as measured by FACIT-Fatigue.

Figure 1 Figure 1.

Disclosures

Risitano: Jazz: Other: Lecture fees, Speakers Bureau; Achillion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees; Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; RA Pharma: Research Funding; Amyndas: Consultancy; Samsung: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Other: Lecture fees, Speakers Bureau; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Speakers Bureau. Wong: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Al-Adhami: Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Chen: Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Peffault De Latour: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.