Can the dynamics of a subducted slab account for the Upper Cretaceous magmatism in the Sava-Vardar Zone and Timok Magmatic Complex? A Numerical Modelling Approach.
Authors: Stanković Nikola , Mladenović Ana , Prelević Dejan , Cvetkov Vesna , Cvetković Vladica 
Published: August 2024

Many questions regarding the geodynamics of the Vardar Tethys have mostly been settled, including the timing of the ophiolite obduction in the Balkans and the configuration of oceanic domains during the Jurassic period. However, the terminal stages of the evolution of Vardar branch of the last Tethyan ocean in the Balkans, specifically the time of its final closure, remains controversial. Current consensus favors a late ocean closure during the Late Cretaceous [1]. Although the timing of the obduction of the Balkan ophiolites indicate a closure in the latest Jurassic/earliest Cretaceous, the discovery of Upper Cretaceous magmatic rocks in the Sava-Vardar suture, interpreted as ophiolites, lead some authors to extend the life of the last Tethyan ocean to the latest Cretaceous. However, more recent findings call into question the oceanic character of these rocks [2], and propose a possible intra-continental environment for their origin. Another strong argument for the existence of an active subduction during the Cretaceous is the presence of the Timok Magmatic Complex (TMC) as part of the larger Apuseni-Banat-Timok-Srednogorje metallogenic belt. In this communication, we present our preliminary results of numerical modelling of Cretaceous geodynamics in the Balkans. We adopt the perspective that the magmatic rocks in the Sava-Vardar Zone do not represent ophiolites, and argue for ocean closure by the earliest Cretaceous, consistent with our previous models of Jurassic ophiolite obduction in the Balkans [3]. We try to account for the Cretaceous magmatism in the Sava-Vardar Zone and TMC in the context of an already closed ocean at the surface. To this end, we model the dynamics of the already subducted slab that is still attached, whereas the ocean lithosphere is completely consumed. The slab consists of the subducted oceanic lithosphere and a smaller portion of the basement of Adria. This slab undergoes detachment which is followed by the rise of its shallower parts and delivery of subducted rock material into favorable conditions for partial melting. The models are based on both an idealized configuration as well as the spontaneous continuation of our previous models of the Tethys closure.Acknowledgement: This research was financed by SRI based on Contract no. 451-03-66/2024-03/200126 as well as the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia through project RECON TETHYS (7744807). VC acknowledges the support of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (F9 and F17).References:[1] Van Hinsbergen, D. J., Torsvik, T. H., Schmid, S. M., Ma&#355;enco, L. C., Maffione, M., Vissers, R. L., ... &amp; Spakman, W. (2020). Orogenic architecture of the Mediterranean region and kinematic reconstruction of its tectonic evolution since the Triassic. Gondwana Research, 81, 79-229.[2] Sokol, K., Prelevi&#263;, D., Romer, R. L., Bo&#382;ovi&#263;, M., van den Bogaard, P., Stefanova, E., ... &amp; &#268;okulov, N. (2020). Cretaceous ultrapotassic magmatism from the Sava-Vardar Zone of the Balkans. Lithos, 354, 105268.[3] Stankovi&#263;, N., Gerya, T., Cvetkov, V., &amp; Cvetkovi&#263;, V. (2023). Did the Western and the Eastern Vardar ophiolites originate through a single intra-oceanic subduction? Insight from numerical modelling. Gondwana Research, 124, 124-140.