Team-Based Surgical Approach to Head and Neck Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction
Authors: Yalamanchi Pratyusha , Peddireddy Nithin S. , McMichael Brennan , Keilin Charles , Casper Keith A. , Malloy Kelly M. , Moyer Jeffrey S. , Prince Mark E. P. , Rosko Andrew J. , Stucken Chaz L. , Spector Matthew E. , Chinn Steven B. 
Published: October 2023

Importance

Because microvascular free flap reconstruction is increasingly used to restore function in patients with head and neck cancer, there is a growing need for evidence-based perioperative care.

Objective

To assess the association of different team-based surgical approaches with intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study of 733 patients was conducted at an academic tertiary care medical center. Head and neck oncologic procedures involving microvascular free flap reconstruction with available intraoperative data collected from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021, were included.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patient characteristics including demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions, operative variables, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes were measured. Descriptive statistics and effect size measures were performed to compare the 3 intraoperative surgical team approaches, specifically single surgeon, separate 2-team approach, and integrated 2-team approach; 1:1 nearest neighbor matching without caliper was performed to compare single- vs 2-team and separate and integrated 2-team approaches. Effect size measures including Cramer V for dichotomous variables, the Kendall W coefficient of concordance for ordinal variables, and η2 for continuous variables were reported with 95% CIs to describe precision.

Results

Among 733 cases, there were no clinically significant differences in patient demographic characteristics, clinicopathologic characteristics, and choice of free flap reconstruction based on intraoperative surgical team approach. The mean (SD) age was 58.7 (12.4) years, and 514 were male (70.1%). In terms of operative and postoperative variables, there was a difference in operative times and intraoperative fluid requirements among the 3 different techniques, with the integrated 2-team approach demonstrating a mean reduction in operative time of approximately 2 hours (η2 = 0.871; 95% CI, 0.852-0.887; mean [SD] operative time = 541 [191] minutes for the single-surgeon approach, 399 [175] minutes for the integrated 2-team approach, and 537 [200] minutes for the separate 2-team approach) and lower fluid requirements of greater than 1 L (η2 = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.762-0.817). In both unadjusted analyses and propensity score matching, there were no clinically significant differences in terms of ischemia time, use of pressors, postoperative complications (including free flap failure, number of return trips to the operating room, length of stay, or 30-day readmission) based on intraoperative team approach.

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings suggest that the integrated 2-team surgical approach for complex head and neck microvascular reconstruction can be used to safely decrease operative time, with no difference in postoperative outcomes.