Presence of Prior-to-Treatment BCR-ABL Mutations In CD34+CD38- Stem Cells of Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase CML Patients and Their Correlation with Imatinib Resistance: Implications of Cancer Pharmacogenomics and Pre-Therapeutic Genetic Testing In Personalized Treatment of BCR-ABL+ Leukemia
Authors: Iqbal Zafar , Iqbal Mudassar , Akhtar Tanveer , Naqvi Mubashar Iqbal , Tahir Ammara H , Gill Tariq Jameel , Abbas Muhammad Naeem , Jamil Abid , Taj Abid Sohail , Abd-Al-Qayyum Dr , ur-Rehman Najeeb , Ferhan Muhammad , Shah Ijaz Hussain , Khalid Muhammad , Qin Weng Xian , Khalid Ahmad Mukhtar , Khan Mahwish , Aleem Aamer , Baig Shahid Mahmood 
Published: October 2019

Abstract 2278

Introduction:

BCR-ABL oncogene makes leukemic cells unstable, leading to mutations in BCR-ABL itself as well as other genes1. Studies have shown that prior-to-treatment BCR-ABL mutations do exist in CD34+CD38- (primitive) CML cells2, a population with stem cell like properties responsible for disease persistence, Imatinib (IM) resistance and relapses3. There are also reports regarding association of such pre-existing BCR-ABL mutations (PEM) and Imatinib resistance4. Therefore, the objective of this study was to find BCR-ABL PEM in CD34+38- cells from newly diagnosed CML patients and their correlation with IM resistance.

Methods:

CD34+CD38- cells from 100 newly diagnosed, untreated, chronic-phase Ph+ CML patients were analyzed for PEM using multiplex allele specific (AS) PCR5 and sequencing AS-PCR products. All of the patients resistant to IM (400mg/day), irrespective of their PEM status, were analyzed by multiplex AS-PCR and DNA sequencing5 for post-therapeutic BCR-ABL mutations, to see if PEM persist in IM resistant patients. T-test was applied to see any significant difference with respect to IM resistance between IM resistant patients with PEM (Group1) and without PEM (Group2).

Results & Discussion:

Thirty two out of 100 patients showed at least one PEM (Table 1, Figure 1). During a follow-up of 12–18 months, all patients with PEM manifested IM resistance (32/32,100%). On the other hand, 24/68 patients without PEM manifested IM resistance (35.3%). This shows a significant difference between two groups of patients with respect to IM resistance (100% vs. 35.3%, p=<0.01). On mutational analysis of IM resistant patients, those with PEM persisted with same mutations present before treatment (32/32=100%) while only 21/24 patients manifesting acquired IM resistance (87.5%) harbored BCR-ABL mutations (Table 1). In IM resistant patients, we detected mutations F311V, M351T, Y253F and T315I. All IM resistant patients except with T315I and Y253F showed completed hematological and cytogenetic responses to Imatinib dose escalation (600-800mg/day) or Nilotinib. Our results are in accordance with previous reports3-5. On the basis of this study, it is concluded that BCR-ABL PEM are present in primitive, innately resistant CD34+38- stem cells from a considerable number of CML patients before start of the therapy. This cell population proliferates under selective pressure of the drug to become major cell population, leading to resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors like Imatinib and Nilotinib. Therefore, we recommend testing of BCR-ABL mutations in CML stem cell population before start of TKI treatment using sensitive, validated techniques like ASO-PCR and DHPLC, and utilization of this mutation data in clinical management, hence in patient-tailored treatment.

References:

Disclosures:

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.