P1170 Long-term outcomes of newly diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients: results from the nationwide EpidemIBD study of GETECCU
Authors: Chaparro M , Garre A , Núñez Ortiz A , Rubio S , Diz-Lois Palomares M T , Riestra S , Alonso-Galán H , Fernández-Salgado E , Ferreiro-Iglesias R , Vela M , Ponferrada Díaz Á , Sánchez Rodríguez E , Hernández V , Arias García L , Barrio J , Huguet J M , Ginard D , Rivero M , Vera I , Alonso-Abreu I , Benítez J M , Aguas M , Rodríguez-Lago I , Calvet X , Fernández-Salazar L , Echarri A , Arroyo M T , Navarro-Llavat M , Vega P , Sierra M , Guerra del Río E , Vicente R , Casanova M J , Navarro P , Ortiz de Zarate J , Varela Trastoy P , Spicakova K , Gutiérrez A , Martín-Arranz M D , Gisbert J P 
Published: January 2024

Background

Aims: 1) To describe the main epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients at IBD diagnosis and the long-term outcomes; 2) to analyse the use of drugs for IBD, and the need of hospitalisations and surgeries; 3) to compare IBD management based on the type of disease and the resources of the hospitals.

Methods

Prospective, population-based nationwide registry. Adult patients diagnosed with IBD, Crohn’s Disease (CD), Ulcerative Colitis (UC) or IBD unclassified, during 2017 in the 17 Spanish regions were included. Patients who consented were followed-up for 5 years (yr) after diagnosis. Treatment was grouped into 5 categories: mesalamine (oral or topical), steroids (intravenous, oral, or topical), immunomodulators (thiopurines, methotrexate or cyclosporine), biologics (anti-TNF, vedolizumab, ustekinumab) or JAK inhibitors (JAKi), and surgery. Hospitals were classified into high resources and low resources ones. Cumulative incidence of exposure to each of the studied treatments was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves; curves were compared with log-rank test.

Results

3,301 incident cases of IBD diagnosed during 2017 in 108 hospitals, covering over 22 million inhabitants in Spain (about 50% of the population), were enrolled into the follow-up study. Main characteristics of the cohort are summarised in table 1. Median diagnosis delayed was 3.5 months (5.6 in CD and 2.7 in UC, p&lt;0.001). During the 5-yr follow-up, 25% of UC patients progressed to more extensive involvement, while 8% of CD patients with inflammatory behaviour progressed to either stricturing or fistulising behaviour. Most of the patients who received mesalamine, corticosteroids, or immunomodulators initiated treatment within the first 2 years after diagnosis (figure 1). However, the cumulative incidence of biologics/JAKi usage steadily increased over time, reaching 49% by the 5-yr timepoint in CD. In terms of surgeries, a progressive increase in cumulative incidence was observed in CD; the incidence of colectomy remained stable in UC from the 2nd year post-diagnosis. A higher cumulative incidence of biologics/JAKi usage, hospitalisations, and surgeries was observed in CD at high resources hospitals; no differences were observed in the use of other therapeutic resources or the management of UC.

Conclusion

In the EpidemIBD large-scale epidemiological study, we have observed that the delay in diagnosing IBD is shorter than previously described. Approximately 50% of patients with CD and 20% of patients with UC ended up receiving biologics/JAKi in the first 5 yrs following diagnosis. The percentage of patients undergoing surgery was lower than previously reported; in the case of UC, the majority of colectomies occurred within the first 2 yrs after diagnosis.