The effects of colchicine in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic coronary artery disease: a post-hoc analysis of the LoDoCo2-trial
Authors: Mohammadnia N , Los J , Opstal T S J , Fiolet A T L , Eikelboom J W , Mosterd A , Nidorf S M , Budgeon C A , Tijssen J G P , Thompson P L , Tack C J , Simsek S , Bax W A , Cornel J H , El Messaoudi S 
Published: October 2022

Background

Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease and is accelerated by diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) who also have DM are at high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. The role of inflammation in atherosclerosis is well established, whereas the role of inflammation on incident and progression of DM has been hypothesized. The nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-, leucine-rich repeat-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in particular, may play an important role in the onset and progression of T2DM. The anti-inflammatory drug colchicine attenuates the NLRP3-inflammasome. The Low-Dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial showed that colchicine reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic CAD.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of colchicine in patients with chronic CAD and DM on cardiovascular events as well as the effect of colchicine on the development of new-onset DM.

Methods

The LoDoCo2 trial randomized 5522 to placebo or colchicine, with a median follow-up of 28.6 months (interquartile range 20.5–44.4). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, or ischaemia-driven revascularization. Secondary outcomes consisted of the aforementioned events, separately. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate univariable associations between DM status for all endpoints in the placebo group. The interactions between treatment group and DM status were evaluated with the addition of treatment and the treatment-by-DM variable interaction.

Results

In total, 1007 participants (18.2%) had DM at baseline. The hazard ratio for the primary endpoint was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.61–1.25) in those with DM and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51–0.80) in those without DM (p for interaction&gt;0.05). Treatment effects of colchicine were consistent over all secondary endpoints (p for interaction&gt;0.05). The incidence of new-onset DM was 1.5% (34/2270) in the colchicine group and 2.2% (49/2245) in the placebo group (p=0.10). Participants with DM were at higher risk for all endpoints. The primary composite end point in the placebo group occurred in 13.0% (67/515) patients with DM and in 8.8% (197/2245) of the patients without DM (unadjusted hazard ratio 1.54 [95% CI 1.16–2.03, p&lt;0.01]) compared to the group without DM. DM was also strongly associated with the occurrence of all secondary end points.

Conclusion

This study shows that the beneficial effects of colchicine on cardiovascular endpoints are consistent regardless of DM status. The data indicate that larger trials are needed to assess whether colchicine reduces the incidence of new-onset DM.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): National Health Medical Research Council of Australia and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development