Studying Chemical Composition of Myofibril and Sarcoplasmic Proteins Separated From Different Types of Meats
Authors: Al-A'miri Zeineb Sabeeh Hameed , Al-Hussainy Khadeeja Sadiq Jaffer 
Published: November 2021

The present study was dealt with the estimation of the chemical composition (moisture, protein, fat, and ash) and physical properties (pH and water holding capacity) of camel, duck, and tuna meat purchased from local markets. Muscle proteins were separated, including myofibril and sarcoplasmic proteins from these meats, estimation of the yield and study of their content. have been studied. the results were as follows:

1. Statistical results disclosed that there was a significant difference at a probability level (P≤0.05) in the percentage of moisture, protein, fat, ash, pH, and values of water holding capability in each of camel, duck, and tuna's meat.

2. Statistical results made a clear reference that there were significant differences at a probability level (P≤0.05) in the percentage of yield, moisture, protein, fat, and ash of myofibril and sarcoplasmic proteins in each of camel, duck, and tuna's meat. Also, a dual interference between meat type and protein type was significant in its impact on percentages of yield and chemical composition.

3. It was observed the percentage of moisture and fat in tuna meat was higher than the percentage of moisture in duck meat. As to the lowest percentage of moisture, it was in the meat of tuna, while the tuna meat recorded the highest percentage in protein and ash, then followed by the percentage of protein and ash in duck meat, while camel's meat recorded the lowest percentage of protein and ash. Besides, results indicated that the values of pH and water holding capability of duck meat were higher than that in the meat of tuna meat and camel.

4. It was found that the percentage of the yield for proteins of a myofibril of duck meat was higher than that in the meat of tuna and camels, as the percentage of yield of sarcoplasmic proteins for tuna was higher than that in the meat of duck and camels.

5. It was found that the percentage of yield for myofibril of duck meat was higher than that in the meat of tuna and camels. As to the percentage of yield for sarcoplasmic proteins of tuna meat, it was higher than that in the meat of duck and camels.

6. The highest percentage of moisture for myofibril proteins was in the meat of camels, and the lowest percentage of it was registered in myofibril proteins in tuna meat, whilst the highest percentage of moisture for sarcoplasmic proteins was registered in the meat of duck, and the lowest of it registered in sarcoplasmic proteins in tuna meat.

7. It was observed that the highest percentage of protein and fat for myofibril and sarcoplasmic proteins was registered in tuna meat, as the lowest percentage of protein and fat for myofibril and sarcoplasmic proteins were observed in duck meat.

8. The study came up with a result revealing that the percentage of ash in proteins of myofibril proteins for duck meat was higher than that in myofibril proteins for camels and tuna meat, whilst, the percentage of ash in sarcoplasmic proteins for camel meat was higher than that in sarcoplasmic proteins for duck and tuna meat.

9. Results showed that the highest concentration of sarcoplasmic proteins was in tuna meat, followed by duck meat, and the lowest concentration for these proteins was in camel meat. The values of proteins (myosin, tropomyosin, reticulin, and collagen) in camel meat, then followed by duck meat, whilst the lowest values for these proteins were in tuna meat.