Validation of temperature data from the RAman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) at Payerne. An application to liquid cloud supersaturation
Authors: Martucci Giovanni , Navas-Guzman Francisco , Renaud Ludovic , Romanens Gonzague , Gamage S. Mahagammulla , Hervo Maxime , Jeannet Pierre , Haefele Alexander 
Published: September 2020

Abstract. The RAman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) is operated at the MeteoSwiss station of Payerne (Switzerland) and provides, amongst other products, continuous measurements of temperature since 2010. The temperature profiles are retrieved from the pure rotational Raman (PRR) signals detected around the 355-nm Cabannes line. The transmitter-receiver system of RALMO is described in detail and the reception and acquisition units of the PRR channels are thoroughly characterized. The FastCom P7888 card used to acquire the PRR signal, the calculation of the dead-time and the desaturation procedure are also presented. The temperature profiles retrieved from RALMO data during the period going from July 2017 to the end of December 2018 have been validated against two reference operational radiosounding systems (ORS) co-located with RALMO, i.e. the Meteolabor SRS-C50 and the Vaisala RS41. These radiosondes have also been used to perform seven calibrations during the validation period. The maximum bias (ΔTmax), mean bias (μ) and mean standard deviation (σ) of RALMO temperature Tral with respect to the reference ORS Tors are used to characterize the accuracy and precision of Tral in the troposphere. The ΔTmax, μ and σ of the daytime differences ΔT=Tral−Tors in the lower troposphere are 0.28 K, 0.02±0.1 K and 0.62±0.03 K, respectively. The nighttime differences suffer a mean bias of μ = 0.05±0.34 K, a mean standard deviation σ=0.66±0.06 , and a maximum bias ΔTmax=0.29 K over the whole troposphere. The small ΔTmax, μ and σ values obtained for both daytime and nighttime comparisons indicate the high stability of RALMO that has been calibrated only seven times over 18 months. The retrieval method can correct for the largest sources of correlated and uncorrelated errors, e.g. signal noise, dead-time of the acquisition system and solar background. Especially the solar radiation (scattered into the field of view from the Zenith angle Phi affects the quality of PRR signals and represents a source of systematic error for the retrieved temperature. An imperfect subtraction of the background from the daytime PRR profiles induces a bias of up to 2 K at all heights. An empirical correction f(Φ) ranging from 0.99 to 1, has therefore been applied to the mean background of the PRR signals to remove the bias. The correction function f(Φ) has been validated against the numerical weather prediction model COSMO suggesting that f(Φ) does not introduce any additional source of systematic or random error to Tral. A seasonality study has been performed to help understanding if the overall daytime and nighttime zero-bias hides seasonal non-zero biases that cancel out when combined in the full dataset. Finally, the validated RALMO temperature has been used in combination with the humidity profiles retrieved from RALMO to calculate the relative humidity and to perform a qualitative study of supersaturation occurring in liquid stratus clouds.