Comprehensive Safety Analysis of Ultimate Bearing Capacity Considering Hydraulic Fracture for Guxian High RCC Gravity Dam
Authors: Ramadan Mohamed , Jia Jinsheng , Zhao Lei , Li Xu , Wu Yangfeng 
Published: July 2024

The widespread adoption of high concrete gravity dams in China and globally underscores the necessity for enhancing design processes to address potential risks, notably hydraulic fracture. This study delves into this urgency by scrutinizing common design regulations and investigating the impact of hydraulic fracture on high concrete gravity dams. A comparative analysis of design specifications from China, the USA, and Switzerland, employing the gravity method, elucidates distinctions, focusing on the Guxian dam. In addition, evaluation of standards with higher resistance to hydraulic fracture was conducted using the Finite Element Method (FEM) with XFEM (eXtended Finite Element Method), employing initial cracks with different depths at the dam heel ranging from 0.2 to 2 m. The vulnerability of the Guxian dam’s cross-section to safety risks prompts further inquiry into the dam’s resistance to hydraulic fracture. Therefore, high-pressure water splitting risks to the ultimate bearing capacity were examined through FEM simulation and theoretical calculations. FEM simulations assessed the dam’s ultimate bearing capacity with and without automatic crack propagation combining the XFEM and overloading methods, particularly considering weak layers in the RCC (Roller-Compacted Concrete) dams. Theoretical calculations utilized a fracture mechanical evaluation model. This model derived mechanism formulas to assess the dam’s resistance to hydraulic fracture. Additionally, the investigation explored the effect of the uplift pressure on the ultimate overload coefficient. Findings indicated that the Guxian dam’s current cross-sectional area was insufficiently safe against hydraulic fracture, necessitating an increase to its cross-sectional area to 18,888.1 m2. Notably, the USA’s and Switzerland’s criteria exhibited greater resistance to hydraulic fracture than the Chinese criteria, especially without considering uplift pressure. Also, the Chinese regulations tended to calculate a lower dam cross-sectional area compared with the other regulations. Numerical calculations revealed a substantial decrease in overall dam safety (up to 48%) when considering automatic crack propagation and the dam’s weak layers. The fracture mechanical evaluation model showed that the Guxian dam had the lowest resistance, with an overloading coefficient of 1.05 considering the uplift pressure. In the case of not considering the uplift pressure, the dam resistance to hydraulic fracture increased and the overloading coefficient rose to 1.27. The results highlighted the risk of hydraulic fracture in concrete dams. Hence, it is recommended that design specifications of high concrete gravity dams incorporate safety analyses of hydraulic fracture in the design process. Reducing uplift pressure plays a crucial role in enhancing the dam’s resistance to hydraulic fractures, emphasizing the need for this consideration in safety evaluations. The differences between the three design specifications were particularly pronounced for dams higher than 200 m. In contrast, dams of 50 m yielded similar results across these regulations.