Activity and Safety of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Patients with Advanced Renal Failure: a Spanish Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Authors: Roig Monica , Ibañez Angela , García Inmaculada , Vera, Juan A. , Aguilar Carlos , del Campo Raquel , Gonzalez Nicolas , Martínez Rafael , Palomera Luis , Picon Isabel , Rodríguez José N. , Sanz, Miguel A. , de la Rubia Javier 
Published: October 2019

Abstract 1886

Poster Board I-909

Background:

Approximately 30% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) present with baseline renal impairement, with 1% to 13% having renal failure requiring dialysis support. The severity of renal impairment significantly affects the prognosis of patients with MM and has been associated with shorter survival or early death. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulating agent indicated for the treatment of MM patients after one prior therapy. Lenalidomide is primarily excreted unchanged by the kidney, adjustements to the starting dose are recommended in patients with moderate or severe renal impairement and in patients on dialysis. For patients with end stage renal disease (CLCr < 30 mL/min) requiring dialysis, the recommended starting dose is 5 mg/day. However, experience in patients with MM and dialysis support is limited. To further examine the safety and activity of lenalidomide-based therapy in these patients, we underwent a retrospective analysis in patients with MM who required dialysis at the time of lenalidomide administration.

Methods:

Fifteen patients (10 M/5 F; median age, 70 years, range 55–77) with relapsed MM from 10 Spanish hospitals received lenalidomide-based therapy between 2007 and 2009. All patients were on dialysis at the time of lenalidomide administration. Median (range) number of therapies previously administered was 2 (1–4) and median time between diagnosis and lenalidomide treatment was 14 months (range, 5–50). Eighty-seven percent of patients received lenalidomide at a dose of 15 mg/day three times weekly after dialysis given in combination with dexamethasone. Patients were given a median of seven 28-day cycles (range, 1–22 cycles) of lenalidomide treatment. Antithrombotic prophylaxis was administrated in fourteen patientes and consisted of low molecular weight heparin (five cases, 36%), oral anticoagulation (four cases, 29%), antiplatelet therapy (three cases, 21%), and combination of the above agents (two cases, 14%).

Results:

Overall, 13 (87%) patients experienced adverse events, with grade 3 neutropenia as the most common (8 patients). Seven patients (47%) developed grade 3–4 infectious complications (3 bacteremias, 1 infection of arterio-venous fistula, 1 septic arthritis, 1 central venous line infection, and two pneumonias in the remaining patient). No patient developed thromboembolic complications. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response: 4 had complete response (29%), 1 a very good partial response (7%), and 3 partial response (21%). In addition, 4 patients had stable disease (29%) and 2 (14%) did not respond. One patient became independent of dialysis following lenalidomide-based treatment. As of July 2009, seven (47%) patients have died, four due to infectious complications and three as a result of progressive disease. Eight patients are still alive, six of them continue on lenalidomide treatment and two discontinued therapy due to liver toxicity (1 case) and progressive disease (1 case).

Conclusion>:

These results suggest that lenalidomide-based regimens can be used in MM patients requiring dialysis, with a good response rate. The high incidence of neutropenia and infectious complications highlights the need of a close monitoring of these patients. Currently ongoing studies will more formally evaluate the impact of lenalidomide-based regimens in this patient population.

Disclosures:

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.