Jerusalem in the contents of the deal of the century “contents and analysis”
Authors: Radman Mahyoub Hassan 
Published: February 2023

There is no doubt that the study of the issue of Jerusalem in the contents of the American-Zionist peace plan or the so-called deal of the century was based on several hypotheses and questions in order to achieve a number of goals, and to highlight the real facts and information about the issue of Jerusalem throughout the different eras, to refute the allegations, false information and fallacies that came in the contents of the deal. The first, second, and fifth hypotheses were proven to be unreliable, while the third and fourth hypotheses were completely proven, and after the study proved the credibility of some hypotheses and the wrongness of others, and answered all the questions raised, the study reached some results, and made some recommendations. Theoretical framework: There is no doubt in saying that the deal of the century, or in a more precise sense, a trick or slap of the century that was developed according to the desires and whims of the Zionists and Americans, seeking to impose it on the Arabs, whether in light of the torn and dispersed Arab reality, or violence and civil wars in some Arab countries, and with the support and participation of some Arabs aspiring to power and they have Political visions and aspirations. They seek, with or without realization, to achieve foreign agendas and plans, whether through their direct participation in these wars on the one hand, or adopting the financing of the deal to make it a success out of their desire to please the United States of America, and in order to provide . First: – Previous Studies “Articles ” support in order to reach power 1. Deal of the Century, Analysis and Alternatives” , In return for ” highlighting Judaism as an eternal religion in Jerusalem, and analyzing the contents of the deal regarding Jerusalem on the other hand, and benefiting from it will be in several aspects. 2. The deal of the century: a deal between Trump and Netanyahu to liquidate the cause and rights of the people of Palestine. This paper deals with the deal in general through an introduction to Trump’s rise to power, and his administration’s move to publish its unilateral plan, which had been promoted and its main elements leaked with regard to Jerusalem, refugees and settlements, after putting it into practice according to the principle of imposing peace by force and imposing solutions and dictates. It is noted that the paper has dealt with the deal from multiple aspects, and can be used in relation to the status of Jerusalem and what is related to it. Second: The problem and importance of the study: based on the fact that the Zionist-Palestinian sides signed the Oslo peace agreement in 1993 AD, and they have more than a quarter of a century, and they are still farther than ever, and that the Zionist-Palestinian conflict is the most difficult, and that the occupied city of Jerusalem is a focal point In this struggle, the in-depth reading of the deal in terms of content and repetition is to emphasize the things that serve the Zionist entity, and the connotations, expressions, overtones, and the disregard and transgression of the Palestinian existence and right. Hence the importance of the objective study, since it is related to the issue of Jerusalem in the American-Zionist deal, that sensitive and thorny issue in the Arab-Zionist conflict since the declaration of the state of the Zionist entity, and the strategy of occupation and annexation of this city from then, until the announcement of the Trump deal at the beginning of the year 2020 AD, in addition to transferring The American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, in addition to the American endeavor to impose the deal of the century by force in light of the torn Arab situation, and the support of some Arab countries for this deal and the announcement of their support and financing. As for the scientific importance, it stems from the lack of scientific studies on this issue, if not non-existent, especially since the deal is recent, announced at the beginning of the year 2020 AD. It is a scientific addition to the Yemeni libraries in particular, and the Arab and Palestinian libraries in general. Third: Study questions and hypotheses: The American measures, whether moving the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, or announcing the plan and seeking to implement it despite its provisions and contents, perpetuate and legitimize the continuation of the occupation on the one hand, and undermine the previous peace negotiations (Oslo 2), and in violation of international resolutions on Jerusalem on the other hand, these past and current American steps It raises two big questions: To what extent does the plan or deal agree, whether with the historical, natural, political, and geographical rights of the Palestinians, or with international laws, customs, and decisions regarding Jerusalem? And what is the extent of the bias of the American mediator in implementing settlement policies, visions, ideas, and Zionist plans? These two questions raise many subsidiary questions, such as: What does Jerusalem mean to Arabs and Muslims? And why Jerusalem?, What is the strategy of the Zionist entity in Jerusalem since its occupation in 1967 AD?, What are the terms and contents of the plan regarding Jerusalem?, And what is the vision of the plan for the issue of Jerusalem? To which party does it depend? Is the plan consistent with previous agreements and international resolutions? What are the reasons and motives that prompted the US administration during the Trump era to take such measures, especially in Jerusalem? Do these measures achieve peace between the Palestinians and the Zionists? And what did the deal give? Or the plan for the Palestinians in Jerusalem? As for the assumptions, they are as follows: 1.There is a real and strong connection between the Jews and Jerusalem 2.The historical evidence proves that the Zionist state was a trustworthy guardian of the holy places in Jerusalem, and no one else, as the deal claims. 3.There is a direct relationship between the Zionist measures and policies in Jerusalem, and the American positions. 4.There is a strong correlation between the Arab and Palestinian situations, the transfer of the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, the launch of the US-Zionist deal, and the contents of the plan regarding Jerusalem. 5.The contents of the plan and related to the issue of Jerusalem are consistent with international laws and resolutions, customs and traditions followed in peace plans, and serve the achievement of peace between the Zionists, Arabs and Palestinians. Fourth: The methodology used, the study relies on two approaches: The legal approach, and the analytical approach, the legal one is used in order to highlight the extent of the legality and legitimacy of the contents of the plan, and its commitment to international covenants, customs, agreements, laws and decisions, aspects of agreement or violation of international law and international decisions, and the legality of the Zionist or American actions in Jerusalem, while the analytical approach is in the historical and descriptive part to find out Some historical aspects of the city of Jerusalem, and the Zionist policies and procedures that have not stopped since the occupation of Jerusalem in 1967, and are still continuing until the emergence of the deception deal in order to: Judaize the city, and obliterate its Islamic and Christian cultural and religious identity and its archaeological monuments. As for the analytical part, it relates to analyzing the American position that is supportive of either the Zionist measures and policies in Jerusalem, or in international forums to obstruct the decisions issued regarding the Palestinian cause and Jerusalem. Fifth: Objectives: The study seeks to achieve the following objectives: 1.Showing the vision of the deal for the city of Jerusalem and its dependency through the contents and statements. 2.Highlighting aspects of agreement or disagreement in these contents, whether with international rights, laws and decisions, or international covenants such as the Charter of the United Nations, the Arab League, and the Organization of the Islamic Conference. 3.Revealing the bias of the American mediator in the Palestinian-Zionist negotiations, and in the terms and contents of the deal that former President Trump sought to implement in favor of the Zionist entity. 4.Clarifying the aspects of manipulation in terms, words, and general, ambiguous and elastic expressions in the contents with regard to Palestinian rights in Jerusalem, and the accuracy, clarity, and repetition of Zionist rights in Jerusalem. 5.Introducing the issue of Jerusalem and its subordination before the declaration of the Zionist entity’s state, and following Zionist policies in Jerusalem since 1967 AD.