Abstract 1706: Investigating the interaction between ETS family members and mutant p53
Authors: Metcalf Stephanie , Hollenhorst Peter 
Published: March 2024

Cancer cases are on the rise globally requiring a deeper understanding of the disease and identification of novel therapeutic targets. Mutations in genes often result in tumor formation. TP53 encodes p53, a tumor suppressive transcription factor, and is mutated in nearly 50% of all cancer cases. Once mutated, p53 loses its tumor suppressive function while simultaneously gaining oncogenic function. p53 mutations disrupt direct p53 binding to DNA and promotes p53 binding to regulatory regions of oncogenes via protein-protein interactions with other transcription factors. One of these interacting partners is ETS2, a member of the ETS transcription factor family. ETS binding sites are present in 50% of all mutant p53 occupied regulatory elements. Other ETS family members have also been linked to mutant p53 but these interactions have either been deemed weak (ETS1) or have yet to be identified as direct (ERG). It is my aim to determine the scope of interaction between the ETS family and mutant p53 and to elucidate whether this interaction is required for the observed oncogenic phenotypes of ETS proteins and mutant p53.To determine which ETS proteins interact with mutant p53 purified ETS proteins were used for affinity pull-down of purified mutant p53. The entire ETS family interacted with mutant p53 to some degree, and several ETS proteins had stronger interactions than ETS2. Truncation studies were used to determine interaction domains. One interacting region was the conserved DNA binding domain, which may explain interaction across the entire family. ERG and ETS2, both strong mutant p53 interactors, had two interaction interfaces. I hypothesize that the second interaction interface defines strong interactors. To determine if interacting ETS are responsible for targeting mutant p53 to the genome, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing measured mutant p53 binding in the presence or absence of different ETS factors. These data indicate that each of the conditions resulted in different p53 binding patterns and that there is a requirement for ETS in mutant p53 binding. Lastly, I wanted to determine if there was a correlation between p53 mutation and expression of strong mutant p53 interactors in certain cancer types. Analysis of TCGA samples showed that in ovarian cancers with p53 mutations, ETS factors that are strong mutant p53 interactors were upregulated in a mutually exclusive pattern, while weak interactors tended to be downregulated, or unchanged. Similar trends were observed among some other cancer types. My studies have shown that several ETS proteins interact with mutant p53 in vitro, recruit p53 to the genome, and that this interaction pattern correlates with expression in mutant p53 driven cancers. Additionally, studies are ongoing to determine phenotypes related to this interaction. Ultimately, if ETS/mutant p53 interactions are deemed important for oncogenesis, these will be attractive targets for drug development.

Citation Format: Stephanie Metcalf, Peter Hollenhorst. Investigating the interaction between ETS family members and mutant p53 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1706.