The Performance of Wearable AI in Detecting Stress Among Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)
Authors: Abd-alrazaq Alaa , Alajlani Mohannad , Ahmad Reham , AlSaad Rawan , Aziz Sarah , Ahmed Arfan , Alsahli Mohammed , Damseh Rafat , Sheikh Javaid 
Published: January 2024

BACKGROUND

Students usually encounter stress throughout their academic path. Ongoing stressors may lead to chronic stress, adversely affecting their physical and mental well-being. Thus, early detection and monitoring of stress among students are crucial. Wearable artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a valuable tool for this purpose. It offers an objective, noninvasive, nonobtrusive, automated approach to continuously monitor biomarkers in real time, thereby addressing the limitations of traditional approaches such as self-reported questionnaires.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the performance of wearable AI in detecting and predicting stress among students.

METHODS

Search sources in this review included 7 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar). We also checked the reference lists of the included studies and checked studies that cited the included studies. The search was conducted on June 12, 2023. This review included research articles centered on the creation or application of AI algorithms for the detection or prediction of stress among students using data from wearable devices. In total, 2 independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–Revised tool was adapted and used to examine the risk of bias in the included studies. Evidence synthesis was conducted using narrative and statistical techniques.

RESULTS

This review included 5.8% (19/327) of the studies retrieved from the search sources. A meta-analysis of 37 accuracy estimates derived from 32% (6/19) of the studies revealed a pooled mean accuracy of 0.856 (95% CI 0.70-0.93). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the accuracy of wearable AI was moderated by the number of stress classes (<i>P</i>=.02), type of wearable device (<i>P</i>=.049), location of the wearable device (<i>P</i>=.02), data set size (<i>P</i>=.009), and ground truth (<i>P</i>=.001). The average estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and <i>F</i><sub>1</sub>-score were 0.755 (SD 0.181), 0.744 (SD 0.147), and 0.759 (SD 0.139), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Wearable AI shows promise in detecting student stress but currently has suboptimal performance. The results of the subgroup analyses should be carefully interpreted given that many of these findings may be due to other confounding factors rather than the underlying grouping characteristics. Thus, wearable AI should be used alongside other assessments (eg, clinical questionnaires) until further evidence is available. Future research should explore the ability of wearable AI to differentiate types of stress, distinguish stress from other mental health issues, predict future occurrences of stress, consider factors such as the placement of the wearable device and the methods used to assess the ground truth, and report detailed results to facilitate the conduct of meta-analyses.

CLINICALTRIAL

PROSPERO CRD42023435051; http://tinyurl.com/3fzb5rnp