Poster 272: The Significance Of Posterior Tibial Slope And Rate Of Concomitant Pathology In Pediatric Tibia Spine Avulsion And Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Authors: Parikh Shital , Wilk Michael , Ierardi Kenny , Lopreiato Nicholas 
Published: August 2023

Objectives:

Fractures of the tibial spine (TSF) occur as a result of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) avulsion fracture from the proximal tibia. Both TSF and ACL injuries are associated with concomitant intraarticular pathology seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and intraoperatively. In addition, posterior tibial slope (PTS) has been identified as a potential risk factor for ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to describe concomitant injuries seen on MRI and at time of surgery for TSF and ACL patients, and to characterize posterior tibial slope in patients who sustain these injuries. Our hypothesis is that ACL and TSF injuries have similar rates of meniscal injury, and that posterior tibial slope is increased in patients with TSF and ACL injuries compared to matched controls.

Methods:

Utilizing an institutional review board approved retrospective study, we identified patients under 18 years of age who underwent arthroscopic management of a TSF from December 31st 2008 to December 31st 2021. Exclusion criteria were patients with a concomitant lower extremity fracture or posterior cruciate ligament injuries, poor imaging quality, and incomplete medical records. TSF patients were compared to an age and gender matched cohort of patients who underwent surgery for a mid- substance ACL rupture, and a similar control group. We evaluated concomitant injuries based on radiology and operative reports and measured PTS on radiographs as well as medial (MTS) and lateral (LTS) posterior slope on MRI for all groups. We compared tibial slope amongst the groups using a one- way analysis of variance test, and the Fisher’s exact test was used to compare concomitant injuries between the ACL and TSF groups.

Results:

85 TSF patients met inclusion criteria, of which 44 had an MRI. There were 41 patients in the ACL group and 44 in the control group. The average age was 11.8 years. Concomitant injuries were identified on MRI in 59.1% of TSF and 51.2% of ACL patients, and intraoperatively in 36.5% of TSF and 37% of ACL patients. The most common concomitant injury was lateral meniscus tears. There was no significant differnce between the TSF and ACL groups in terms of lateral meniscus tears seen on MRI (29.5% TSF vs 31.7 ACL, p=1.0) and seen on arthroscopy (18.2% TSF vs 31.7% ACL, p=0.21). Similarly there were no significant differences between the TSF and ACL group in terms of medial meniscus tears seen on MRI (13.6% vs 17.1%, p = 0.77) and on arthroscopy (9% vs 5%, p=0.19). There was a significant difference between groups when comparing the pivot-shift bone bruise pattern seen on MRI (63.6% TSF vs 90.2% ACL, P= <0.01). There was significantly increased radiographic PTS in the TSF and ACL groups (Radiographs 8.7°+/-3.0° TSF vs 9.5°+/-3.3° ACL vs 6.6°+/-2.3° Control, p= <0.01). This was also seen in the MTS mesured on MRI (MTS 5.3°+/-3.1° TSF vs 4.9°+/-2.7° ACL vs 3.7°+/-2.3° Control p= 0.02). There was no significant difference in LTS between TSF and Controls, but there was between ACL and Controls (LTS 4.1°+/-2.8° TSF vs 6.8°+/- 3.9°ACL vs 4.3°+/- 2.3° Control, p=<0.01).

Conclusions:

This study is the first to depict tibial slope and bone contusion patterns seen in tibial spine injuries, as well as compare rates of meniscal injury and tibial slope between ACL and control patients. Posterior tibial slope is significantly increased in patients who sustain a TSF or ACL injury, suggesting that it may be a risk factor for injury. Similar rates of concomitant meniscal pathology are seen in both TSF and ACL injured patients, which may reflect similar mechanisms of injury. This also highlights that care must be taken to evaluate for additional pathology when treating TSF and ACL injuries. Future study is needed to determine the role, if any, that tibial slope plays in tibial spine fractures as well as to determine if intraarticular pathology identified on MRI influences longer term patient outcomes.