Exploring Systems‐Based Practice in a Sample of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Programs
Authors: Elwood Douglas , Kirschner Jonathan S. , Moroz Alex , Berliner Jeff 
Published: February 2009

Objective

This study explores physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) residents' attitudes, knowledge, and perception of health care policy in the context of systems‐based practice, one of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's core competencies for residency training.

Design

A cross‐sectional, observational design was used via survey administration. These surveys were categorized into 6 different sections: (1) general health care policy; (2) resident awareness of and involvement in policy matters; (3) specific policy pertaining to physical medicine and rehabilitation; (4) rehabilitation alternatives to acute care; (5) documentation; and (6) educational exposure. Residents filled the survey anonymously, noting only their postgraduate year and program name for identification.

Setting

This study was conducted at 3 large PM&R residency programs in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York.

Participants

Residents participating in this study totaled 32 from Program A, 26 from Program B, and 18 from Program C.

Methods

Residents at all 3 programs were asked to complete a 34‐question survey. In total, 57 surveys were evaluated. The response rates for completing the entire survey for the 3 programs were 81% (26 of 32), 73% (19 of 26), and 67% (12 of 18). The overall response rate was 75%. Not all residents at each program were given surveys to complete.

Main Outcome Measures

This study explored resident's attitudes, knowledge, and perception of healthcare policy. Outcomes included understanding how residents feel about the extent of their general policy education, their awareness of current issues and the organizational entities that shape these policies, and whether they should be exposed to these topics within the setting of their training programs. Responses were measured on a 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree) scale. Specific paired t‐tests were performed on select questions to further validate the responses.

Results

Residents uniformly agree that healthcare policy is an important aspect of medical education and should be taught within their residency programs but do not feel that they currently play an active role in affecting change (8.1 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 1.6, P < .001). They admit to not being aware of how to get involved but would like to delve more into these issues (3.9 ± 1.5 vs. 7.1 ± 1.5, P = .01). Pertaining to PM&R‐specific policy, residents believe that functional ability trumps diagnosis as the most important determinant for admission to an acute inpatient facility (7.5 ± 1.2 vs. 5.9 ± 1.8, P < .001). Although residents see the importance of documentation, they indicate they are not adequately trained in this area (8.2 ± 0.7 vs. 3.9 ± 1.1, P = .04). Finally, residents acknowledge they have limited understanding of other rehabilitation delivery options or insurance companies (5.5 ± 1.2 and 3.5 ± 1.7).

Conclusion

Systems‐based practice is a core requirement of residency training yet has not been extensively studied. This study suggests that residents find systems‐based issues important to their overall education but are not sufficiently or effectively addressed in residency. The healthcare delivery environment including PM&R is rapidly changing. It is imperative that residents are equipped with the knowledge of and ability to adapt to these changes.