P454 Massive parallel fungal sequencing on formalin-fixed tissues: development and contribution in integrated histomolecular diagnosis
Authors: Trecourt Alexis , Rabodonirina Meja , Josse Emilie , Ginevra M. Christophe , Chapey-Picq Emmanuelle , Dupont Damien , Miossec Charline , Persat Florence , Mauduit Claire , Traverse-Glehen Alexandra , Meyronet David , Wallon Martine , Simon Brunio , Menotti Jean 
Published: September 2022

Poster session 3, September 23, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM

 

Objectives

Histopathology is the gold standard for distinguishing between colonization and fungal infection, but it does not provide a precise diagnosis of genera/species. However, if the culture is negative or if no specimen is sent to the Mycology laboratory, only the specimen sent to the Pathology department is available. Formalin fixation and paraffin embedding (FFPE) cause DNA damage, making it difficult to perform molecular techniques.

The objective was to develop and evaluate the contribution of massive parallel sequencing (MPS) to FFPE tissues.

Methods

Histopathological review of all cases was performed. Then, DNA extraction from FFPE tissues was optimized by: (1) macrodissecting the fungal-rich area on the paraffin block; (2) comparing the efficiency of two DNA extraction kits (QIAamp DNAmicro-kit, QIAGEN; Maxwell 16 LEVRNA FFPE Purification kit, Promega, optimized for RNA and DNA extraction), by comparison of Aspergillus fumigatus and Mucorale specific PCR results for 30 cases. For 124 other cases, the sensitivity of two primer pairs (ITS3/4 and MITS2A/2B) was tested for identification by Sanger sequencing and then MPS. Finally, a histomolecular comparison was performed. This work was funded by the Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française (SPILF).

Results

To optimize extraction, DNA was extracted by both kits from samples of 16 mucormycoses and 14 A. fumigatus infections. PCR sensitivity was better with the QIAGEN extraction kit [100% (30/30)] compared to the Promega kit [86.7% (26/30)].

PCR amplification of fungal DNA from an additional 124 FFPE samples was performed. The primer pairs ITS3/4 and MITS2A/2B, allowed: (1) identification by Sanger sequencing-histopathological analysis in 38.7% (48/124) of the cases in total, and more specifically 33% (41/124) of cases with the ITS3/4 primers and 32.3% (40/124) of cases with the MITS2A/B primers; and (2) identification by integrated SMP-histopathological analysis in 75% (93/124) of all cases (primers ITS3/4 and MITS2A/2B), and more specifically 66.1% (82/124) for ITS3/4 and 62.1% (77/124) for MITS2A/B (both primer pairs did not detect/amplify the same fungal genera/species). The combination of all results from Sanger sequencing and MPS led to fungal identification in 75.8% (94/124) of cases. In total, the addition of NGS to Sanger sequencing increased the diagnostic proportion by 36.3% (45/124; P &lt;.0001). Example of integrated histomolecular diagnosis (Fig. 1): patient with a pseudotumor presentation of pulmonary invasive aspergillosis (A: thoracic CT scan; B: macroscopic examination of lesion after formalin fixation; C, D, E: Hematoxylin-eosin-safran, x20 and x400: observation of a necrotic mass caused by hyalohyphomycetes; F: Grocott, x400) with no culture or molecular identification available on fresh tissue. In contrast, identification by MPS on FFPE tissue was compatible with morphological analysis: Aspergillus section Fumigati, leading to the integrated histomolecular diagnosis of pulmonary invasive aspergillosis.

Conclusion

The development of the fungal MPS on FFPE tissues is innovative and unprecedented for the achievement of an integrated histomolecular diagnosis in fungal pathology. It increases significantly the diagnostic proportion by 36.3%. This strategy can be used in hospitals and could improve patient management, especially when no sample is sent to the Mycology laboratory or when the culture is negative.