Epigenetic age acceleration and cognitive resilience in the Framingham Heart Study
Authors: Dacey Ryan , Durape Shruti , Wang Mengyao , Hwang Phillip H , Gurnani Ashita S. , Ang Ting Fang Alvin , Devine Sherral A. , Choi Seo‐Eun , Lee Michael L. , Scollard Phoebe , Gibbons Laura E. , Mukherjee Shubhabrata , Trittschuh Emily H. , Sherva Richard , Dumitrescu Logan C. , Hohman Timothy J. , Cuccaro Michael L. , Saykin Andrew J. , Crane Paul K. , Li Yi , Levy Daniel , Ma Jiantao , Liu Chunyu , Lunetta Kathryn L. , Au Rhoda , Farrer Lindsay A. , Mez Jesse 
Published: January 2025

Background

There is growing evidence that epigenetic age acceleration may predict late life cognitive decline and dementia, but it is unknown whether this is due to accelerated neurodegeneration or reduction in cognitive resilience. We examined the relationship between epigenetic clocks and domain specific neuropsychological (NP) factor scores, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), and all‐cause dementia, before and after accounting for plasma total tau (t‐tau), a marker of neurodegeneration.

Method

DNA methylation and plasma t‐tau (Simoa assay; Quanterix) data from 2091 Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort participants were generated from blood at the same Exam 8 visit (2005‐2008). Three epigenetic clock measures: DunedinPACE, PC PhenoAge, and PC GrimAge were estimated from the DNA methylation data. Longitudinal NP factor scores were previously derived for memory, language, and executive function using confirmatory factor analysis. We tested the association of epigenetic age acceleration with cognitive trajectories using linear mixed effects models and with time to MCI, all‐cause dementia and AD using Cox‐proportional hazard models. Models were run with and without adjustment for plasma t‐tau. All models included APOE ε4‐carrier status, education, smoking, age, and sex as covariates. Epigenetic measures were standardized in all models.

Result

At Exam 8, the sample was, on average, 66.3 (SD = 9.0) years of age, 54.8% female, and had 16.4 (SD = 2.7) years of education. DundeinPACE was significantly associated with faster decline in executive function (βtimeXepi_age = ‐0.005, 95% CI:[‐0.009,‐0.002], p = 0.0020), but not with baseline executive function. Older PhenoAge (βepi_age = ‐0.041, 95% CI:[‐0.067,‐0.014], p = 0.0028) and GrimAge (βepi_age = ‐0.042, 95% CI:[‐0.073,‐0.011], p = 0.0084) were significantly associated with worse baseline executive function, but not with rate of decline. Older PhenoAge also was significantly associated with worse baseline memory (βepi_age = ‐0.037, 95% CI:[‐0.061,‐0.012], p = 0.0036). DunedinPACE was significantly associated with time to MCI (HR = 1.20, 95% CI:[1.06,1.35], p = 0.0034), AD (HR = 1.30, 95% CI:[1.07,1.57], p = 0.0068) and all‐cause dementia (HR = 1.30, 95% CI:[1.10,1.53], p = 0.0017). Results remained similar after adjustment for plasma t‐tau.

Conclusion

Epigenetic age acceleration may be a marker of cognitive resilience, particularly in executive function. Of the three epigenetic clocks examined, DundedinPACE showed the most robust associations with cognitive resilience, with lower DunedinPACE associated with greater cognitive resilience.