Automatic International Classification of Diseases Coding System: Deep Contextualized Language Model With Rule-Based Approaches (Preprint)
Authors: Chen Pei-Fu , Chen Kuan-Chih , Liao Wei-Chih , Lai Feipei , He Tai-Liang , Lin Sheng-Che , Chen Wei-Jen , Yang Chi-Yu , Lin Yu-Cheng , Tsai I-Chang , Chiu Chi-Hao , Chang Shu-Chih , Hung Fang-Ming 
Published: June 2022

BACKGROUND

The tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) is widely used for epidemiological research and health management. The clinical modification (CM) and procedure coding system (PCS) of ICD-10 were developed to describe more clinical details with increasing diagnosis and procedure codes and applied in disease-related groups for reimbursement. The expansion of codes made the coding time-consuming and less accurate. The state-of-the-art model using deep contextual word embeddings was used for automatic multilabel text classification of ICD-10. In addition to input discharge diagnoses (DD), the performance can be improved by appropriate preprocessing methods for the text from other document types, such as medical history, comorbidity and complication, surgical method, and special examination.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to establish a contextual language model with rule-based preprocessing methods to develop the model for ICD-10 multilabel classification.

METHODS

We retrieved electronic health records from a medical center. We first compared different word embedding methods. Second, we compared the preprocessing methods using the best-performing embeddings. We compared biomedical bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BioBERT), clinical generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding (Clinical XLNet), label tree-based attention-aware deep model for high-performance extreme multilabel text classification (AttentionXLM), and word-to-vector (Word2Vec) to predict ICD-10-CM. To compare different preprocessing methods for ICD-10-CM, we included DD, medical history, and comorbidity and complication as inputs. We compared the performance of ICD-10-CM prediction using different preprocesses, including definition training, external cause code removal, number conversion, and combination code filtering. For the ICD-10 PCS, the model was trained using different combinations of DD, surgical method, and key words of special examination. The micro F<sub>1</sub> score and the micro area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used to compare the model’s performance with that of different preprocessing methods.

RESULTS

BioBERT had an F<sub>1</sub> score of 0.701 and outperformed other models such as Clinical XLNet, AttentionXLM, and Word2Vec. For the ICD-10-CM, the model had an F<sub>1</sub> score that significantly increased from 0.749 (95% CI 0.744-0.753) to 0.769 (95% CI 0.764-0.773) with the ICD-10 definition training, external cause code removal, number conversion, and combination code filter. For the ICD-10-PCS, the model had an F<sub>1</sub> score that significantly increased from 0.670 (95% CI 0.663-0.678) to 0.726 (95% CI 0.719-0.732) with a combination of discharge diagnoses, surgical methods, and key words of special examination. With our preprocessing methods, the model had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.853 (95% CI 0.849-0.855) and 0.831 (95% CI 0.827-0.834) for ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of our model with the pretrained contextualized language model and rule-based preprocessing method is better than that of the state-of-the-art model for ICD-10-CM or ICD-10-PCS. This study highlights the importance of rule-based preprocessing methods based on coder coding rules.