Community‐based health programme for nurses and midwives: A mixed methods evaluation
Authors: Jarden Rebecca , Jarden Aaron , Bujalka Helena , Weiland Tracey , Brockenshire Naomi , Taylor Glenn , Gerdtz Marie 
Published: July 2024

Aim

To evaluate a community‐based psychological health and well‐being programme for nurses and midwives.

Design

Mixed methods programme evaluation.

Methods

Four studies were included: observational descriptive study (cross‐sectional survey) of the health, well‐being and experiences of previous programme participants (Study 1); observational exploratory prospective cohort study (longitudinal survey) of health, well‐being and experiences of participants who engaged in the programme from 2020 to 2023 (Study 2); qualitative descriptive study (interviews) of experiences and perceptions of nurses and midwives who have engaged with the programme as participants or clinicians (Study 3); observational descriptive study (cross‐sectional survey) of experiences and perceptions of programme stakeholders (Study 4). Surveys included validated measures. Data were collected online. Descriptive, repeated measures and thematic analyses were conducted.

Results

One‐hundred and fifteen participants completed Study 1: 20% (n = 23) reported stress in the severe‐to‐extremely severe category; 22% (n = 25) reported psychological distress in the moderate‐to‐severe category. Thirty‐one programme participants were followed in Study 2: the effect of the programme on participant well‐being over time was not significant. Sixteen programme participants and eight programme clinicians were interviewed (Study 3). Experiences of nurses and midwives engaging with the programme were highly positive and strong attributes of the programme included (1) shared professional experience of clinicians and participants which supported a common language and facilitated understanding, and (2) effective programme leadership, and autonomy and flexibility in the clinicians' role which enabled and supported a positive working experience. Thirty‐nine broader stakeholders participated in a cross‐sectional survey (Study 4). All stakeholders reported high satisfaction with the programme. Participants considered the programme being ‘by nurses and midwives, for nurses and midwives’ critical to the programme's success and value.

Conclusions

The community‐based psychological health and well‐being programme developed, led and delivered by nurses and midwives, for nurses and midwives, was a highly valued resource.

Impact

Levels of stress and burnout in the health workforce are high.

A community‐based psychological health and well‐being programme for nurses and midwives was found to be an important and highly valued resource for nurses and midwives.

A programme delivered by nurses and midwives, for nurses and midwives, was considered critical to programme success.

Programme leadership, and autonomy and flexibility in the programme clinicians' roles, facilitated and supported a positive working experience for programme clinicians.

Implications for the Profession and Patient Care

Quality and safety in patient care is directly impacted by the well‐being of nurse and midwives. A community‐based psychological health and well‐being programme for nurses and midwives was found to be an important and highly valued resource for nurses and midwives.

Reporting Method

Survey findings were reported according to STROBE (von Elm et al. in Lancet, 370:1453–1457, 2007) and qualitative findings according to COREQ (Tong et al. in International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6):349–357, 2007).

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.