Multimodal multilayer network centrality relates to executive functioning
Authors: Breedt Lucas C. , Santos Fernando A. N. , Hillebrand Arjan , Reneman Liesbeth , van Rootselaar Anne-Fleur , Schoonheim Menno M. , Stam Cornelis J. , Ticheler Anouk , Tijms Betty M. , Veltman Dick J. , Vriend Chris , Wagenmakers Margot J. , van Wingen Guido A. , Geurts Jeroen J. G. , Schrantee Anouk , Douw Linda 
Published: June 2021

Executive functioning is a higher-order cognitive process that is thought to depend on a brain network organization facilitating network integration across specialized subnetworks. The frontoparietal network (FPN), a subnetwork that has diverse connections to other brain modules, seems pivotal to this integration, and a more central role of regions in the FPN has been related to better executive functioning. Brain networks can be constructed using different modalities: diffusion MRI (dMRI) can be used to reconstruct structural networks, while resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) yield functional networks. These networks are often studied in a unimodal way, which cannot capture potential complementary or synergistic modal information. The multilayer framework is a relatively new approach that allows for the integration of different modalities into one ‘network of networks’. It has already yielded promising results in the field of neuroscience, having been related to e.g. cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Multilayer analyses thus have the potential to help us better understand the relation between brain network organization and executive functioning. Here, we hypothesized a positive association between centrality of the FPN and executive functioning, and we expected that multimodal multilayer centrality would supersede unilayer centrality in explaining executive functioning. We used dMRI, rsfMRI, MEG, and neuropsychological data obtained from 33 healthy adults (age range 22-70 years) to construct eight modality-specific unilayer networks (dMRI, fMRI, and six MEG frequency bands), as well as a multilayer network comprising all unilayer networks. Interlayer links in the multilayer network were present only between a node’s counterpart across layers. We then computed and averaged eigenvector centrality of the nodes within the FPN for every uni- and multilayer network and used multiple regression models to examine the relation between uni- or multilayer centrality and executive functioning. We found that higher multilayer FPN centrality, but not unilayer FPN centrality, was related to better executive functioning. To further validate multilayer FPN centrality as a relevant measure, we assessed its relation with age. Network organization has been shown to change across the life span, becoming increasingly efficient up to middle age and regressing to a more segregated topology at higher age. Indeed, the relation between age and multilayer centrality followed an inverted-U shape. These results show the importance of FPN integration for executive functioning as well as the value of a multilayer framework in network analyses of the brain. Multilayer network analysis may particularly advance our understanding of the interplay between different brain network aspects in clinical populations, where network alterations differ across modalities.

Highlights:

Multimodal neuroimaging and neurophysiology data were collected in healthy adults

Multilayer frontoparietal centrality was positively associated with executive functioning

Unilayer (unimodal) centralities were not associated with executive functioning

There was an inverted-U relationship between multilayer centrality and age