Impact of party balloon inflation manoeuvre during saline contrast transthoracic echocardiography to detect a patent foramen ovale: multicenter registry study
Authors: Kataoka A , Izumo M , Kito K , Katayama T , Arakawa M , Amano M , Mochizuki Y , Iawano H , Nakaoka Y , Yamashita E , Uno K , Yamada H , Kozuma K 
Published: October 2024

Background

Paradoxical embolism due to patent foramen ovale (PFO) can cause cryptogenic stroke. Agitated saline contrast transthoracic echocardiography (ASC-TTE) is an essential diagnostic tool for PFOs, and provocation using the Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) is necessary during the examination. Although VM is the standard method, assessing whether sufficient provocation has been achieved can pose challenges for the patients and examining staff. Conversely, a party balloon inflation manoeuvre (PBIM), which we previously reported (1, 2), offered a clear visual confirmation of provocation than conventional VM and showed effectiveness in cases of inadequate provocation. However, collective evaluation of PBIM by group remains unknown.

Purpose

This study aimed to demonstrate the superiority of PBIM over standard provocative methods, such as conventional or inferior vena cava compression VM, during ASC-TTE.

Methods

This multicentre registry study was conducted across eight high-volume institutions in Japan. A total of 117 consecutive patients (62.3% men, mean age; 56.2 ± 13.8 years, as of December 31, 2023) in whom paradoxical embolism was suspected and PFO was detected by transesophageal echocardiography, underwent PBIM and standard provocative methods during ASC-TTE. We compared them using a five-point microbubble grade (none or 1–4) using the right-to-left cardiac shunt as the primary endpoint (Figure 1).

Results

PBIM produced microbubble upgrading in 51 (43.6%, yellow panels in Figure 2), no change in 54 (46.1%), and down-grading in 12 (10.3%, blue panels in Figure 2) patients, compared to standard provocative methods. Wilcoxon paired analysis revealed that PBIM had a significantly larger microbubble grade than the standard provocative methods (median 3.0 interquartile range (IQR) [3.0–4.0] vs 3.0 IQR [1.7–4.0], p&lt;0.001). If significant right-to-left shunt was grade ≥2, which was considered as the indication of catheter PFO closure, the pairwise McNemar’s test showed diagnostic performance of significant right-to-left cardiac shunt using PBIM improved from 75.2% to 91.5% (improvement rate; 16.3%, 95% CI; 8.4–24.0, p&lt;0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed insufficient balloon inflation due to inexperience and risk of paradoxical embolism score independently associated with downgrading in PBIM after adjustments for age, sex, clinically relevant variables, and other echocardiographic parameters (odds ratio (OR); 24.0, 95% interquartile range (CI); 3.3–172.1, p&lt;0.01 and OR; 0.60, 95% CI; 0.39–0.91, p&lt;0.05, respectively).

Conclusions

PBIM significantly increased the microbubble grade compared to standard provocative methods. PIBM, using a simple tool, may provide an appropriate treatment strategy for patients with potential cryptogenic stroke attributed to PFO, especially those who are falsely diagnosed as negative for significant right-to-left cardiac shunts.Primary endpointsAgreement of 5-point microbubble grade