Influence of peak exercise-induced blood pressure on basal to apical myocardial wall thickness in elite athletes: a sex-specific CMR study
Authors: Van Diepen M A , Daems J J N , Van Hattum J C , Verwijs S M , Boekholdt S M , Van Randen A , Planken R N , Groenink M , Moen M H , Bijsterveld N R , Asselbergs F W , Jorstad H T 
Published: October 2024

Background

Understanding the sex-specific physiological remodelling response of the myocardial walls to peak exercise-induced blood pressure (SBPpeak) is essential for distinguishing healthy adaptation from pathological remodelling in athletes.

Purpose

We investigated how SBPpeak relates to myocardial wall thickness measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in elite athletes.

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis of healthy elite athletes included in the ELITE study who underwent both cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and CMR. Imaging software’s built-in AI option determined average end-diastolic wall thicknesses of all sixteen AHA-defined segments on short-axis cine images with four-chamber long-axis reference. Our primary metrics of interest were Spearman's correlations between SBPpeak and left ventricular mass indexed to body surface area (LVM/BSA), as well as average wall thickness across the sixteen myocardial segments, stratified by sex and endurance/non-endurance sports status. Secondary analyses involved regression models to evaluate the influence of SBPpeak on myocardial wall thickness, adjusting for sex, body size, CPET variables and sport type.

Results

In 75 athletes (median age: 24; 71% female; 61% engaged in endurance sports), CPET and CMR were performed within a median interval of 5 months [interquartile range: 1-13 months]. SBPpeak was similar in female and male athletes (170 [160-180] vs. 174 [169-184] mmHg, p=0.121, respectively) and in endurance and non-endurance athletes (both 170 [160-180] mmHg, p=0.625). Female elite athletes showed weak to moderate positive correlations between SBPpeak and the majority of basal and mid-ventricular AHA segments (rho = 0.27 – 0.48, Figure). This was most pronounced in the mid-ventricular anterolateral segment (AHA06: rho = 0.48, p&lt;0.001). LVM/BSA in females was positively correlated with SBPpeak (rho = 0.31, p=0.025). Male elite athletes demonstrated greater absolute wall thickness across all AHA segments compared to females, however, there was a moderate correlation with SBPpeak exclusive to the basal anterior segment (AHA01: rho = 0.48, p=0.028). Backward stepwise multivariate regression analyses (Table) revealed SBPpeak as an independent predictor of the thickness of all basal AHA segments except for the basal inferoseptal segment (AHA03), and the mid-anterior and anterolateral segments. Associationswere maintained after adjustment for maximum wattage, body surface area, and sex, with type of sports consistently excluded from the models.

Conclusion

In the extreme phenotypes of elite athletes, SBPpeak correlates especially with basal myocardial thickness, independent of sex, BSA and maximum work rate influences. We found stronger associations between SBPpeak and myocardial adaptation in female athletes. These findings suggest a paramount role of exercise-induced blood pressure on basal myocardial remodelling surpassing the effect of sports type.Figure:segmental polar plot (heat map)Table:GAM regression models