AB0869-HPR HOW TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOPOROSIS?
Authors: Lammert A. , Lezhenina S. , Shuvalova N. , Andreeva N. , Guryanova E. 
Published: May 2021

Background:

This paper is an assessment of quality-of-life for patients living with osteoporosis. It employs special questionnaires and scales to allow for more detailed observation of the patient both during initial treatment and in dynamics. This allows us to establish the effectiveness of the therapy, to assess the need to correct the treatment and rehabilitation program, and to compare the effectiveness of various treatment methods and determine disease prognosis.

Objectives:

to assess quality-of-life in patients with osteoporosis for further development of treatment and rehabilitation programs.

Methods:

To assess the quality-of-life in patients with osteoporosis, HRQOL and SF-36 scale were used. The study was conducted from January to December 2019, at the Republican Clinical Hospital of the Chuvash Republic. The study involved 70 patients (n = 70) with a diagnosis of osteoporosis with a pathological fracture. Of the 70 patients included in the study, 35 women aged 67 ± 1.2 years and 35 men aged 60 ± 1.2 years. The results were statistically processed using MS Office Excel programs.

Results:

According to the analysis carried out by the HRQOL method, more than half of the patients (52.13%) experienced daily back pain, which worsens their mood and well-being. When assessing the degree of pain, almost half of the patients (48.73%) rated their pain by VAS as moderate. Moreover, most of the respondents experienced a “significant” (46.51%) or “moderate” (34.29%) decrease in social activity due to pain syndrome associated with osteoporosis. In connection with this, 44.51% rated their satisfaction with their lives as “average degree of satisfaction”.

When analyzing the quality-of-life indicators according to the SF-36 scales, we determined that the mental component of health predominates for women (The Short Form-36: MH=68,6±3,45 (Men: MH=48,5±2,85)). In men, high quantitative values of the scales “physical” and “role physical functioning” (The Short Form-36: PF=62,5±3,33; RP=58,4±3,81) indicate a more pronounced nature of changes in somatic status, which has a significant impact on the quality-of-life. The intensity of pain was perceived to be higher by men (The Short Form-36: BP=75,6±4,06) than by women (The Short Form-36: BP=35,7±1,86). This confirms that osteoporosis and its complications negatively affect the human psyche and can significantly worsen the quality-of-life.

Conclusion:

Analysis of quality-of-life indicators using the SF-36, HRQOL method contributes to a more correct choice of effective strategy for specialized medical care and rehabilitation for patients with osteoporosis. This choice should be developed individually, taking into account the age, gender characteristics, the severity of structural and functional disorders and the psychological state of the patient. It must also take into account the presence and severity of concomitant diseases, which will require additional research and discussion at different levels of the organization of medical care.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared