Abstract 5639: Computational prediction of MHC anchor locations guide neoantigen prediction and prioritization
Authors: Xia Huiming , McMichael Joshua , Becker-Hapak Michelle , Onyeador Onyinyechi C. , Buchli Rico , McClain Ethan , Pence Patrick , Supabphol Suangson , Richters Megan M. , Basu Anamika , Ramirez Cody A. , Puig-Saus Cristina , Cotto Kelsy C. , Hundal Jasreet , Kiwala Susanna , Goedegebuure S. Peter , Johanns Tanner M. , Dunn Gavin P. , Ribas Antoni , Miller Christopher A. , Gillanders William , Fehniger Todd A. , Griffith Obi L. , Griffith Malachi 
Published: June 2022

Neoantigens are novel peptide sequences resulting from somatic mutations in tumors that upon loading onto major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules allow recognition by T cells. Accurate neoantigen identification is thus critical for designing cancer vaccines and predicting response to immunotherapies. Neoantigen identification and prioritization relies on correctly inferring whether the presenting peptide sequence can successfully induce an immune response. As the majority of somatic mutations are SNVs, changes between wildtype and mutant peptide are subtle and require cautious interpretation. An important, yet underappreciated, variable in neoantigen-prediction pipelines is the mutation position within the peptide relative to its anchor positions for the patient’s specific HLA alleles. While a subset of peptide positions are presented to the T-cell receptor for recognition, others are responsible for anchoring to the MHC, making these positional considerations critical for predicting T-cell responses. However, a systematic method for determining anchor locations for the wide range of HLA alleles present in the population and application of these to evaluate MT/WT peptide pairs arising in tumors has not been reported. As a result, many neoantigen studies have either failed to adequately consider this crucial factor or have used conventional assumptions to guide their neoantigen identification process. Here, we provide a computational workflow for predicting anchor locations for a wide range of HLA alleles, using a reference dataset generated from clinical and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) patient samples. We calculated high probability anchor positions for different peptide lengths for over 300 common HLA alleles. Analysis of these results showed clusters of different anchor trends among the HLA alleles analyzed. A subset of these HLA anchor results were orthogonally validated using protein crystallography structures. Analysis of 923 tumor samples showed that 7-41% of neoantigen candidates were potentially misclassified in the neoantigen selection process and can be rescued using allele-specific knowledge of anchor positions. These anchor predictions are currently undergoing experimental validation using both peptide-MHC stability assays as well as fluorescence-based competition binding assays. By incorporating our anchor prediction results into neoantigen prediction pipelines, such as pVACtools, we hope to formalize and streamline the identification process for relevant clinical studies.

Citation Format: Huiming Xia, Joshua McMichael, Michelle Becker-Hapak, Onyinyechi C. Onyeador, Rico Buchli, Ethan McClain, Patrick Pence, Suangson Supabphol, Megan M. Richters, Anamika Basu, Cody A. Ramirez, Cristina Puig-Saus, Kelsy C. Cotto, Jasreet Hundal, Susanna Kiwala, S. Peter Goedegebuure, Tanner M. Johanns, Gavin P. Dunn, Antoni Ribas, Christopher A. Miller, William Gillanders, Todd A. Fehniger, Obi L. Griffith, Malachi Griffith. Computational prediction of MHC anchor locations guide neoantigen prediction and prioritization [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5639.