Assessing urban soils&#8217; pollution in Moscow megalopolis&#160;by portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer
Authors: Romzaykina Olga , Slukovskaya Marina , Vasenev Viacheslav , Paltseva Anna , Sarzhanov Dmitrii , Losev Artyom 
Published: March 2022

&lt;p&gt;The study of urban soils of large cities is complicated due to their heterogeneity and continued reconstruction. Large territorial coverage and administrative prohibitions in some areas led to the difficulty of conducting full-fledged field sampling campaigns and results in inaccuracy. &amp;#1045;xpress methods of chemical elements&amp;#8217; content analysis using portable XRF devices allows to quickly assess the pollution level, minimizing the most complicating factors of research. However, the results obtained using a pXRF analyzer require adjustment of the instrument readings as they can be affected by a set of factors such as humidity, sample heterogeneity, and inter-element interference. Modern models of pXRF analyzers allow automatic correction of instrument readings through the correction factors stored in the device's memory.&amp;#160;&lt;br&gt;Our research focused on the development of such correction factors for the Olympus Vanta, one of the most common pXRF analyzers available today. Urban soils are characterized by high heterogeneity both in terms of potentially toxic metal (PTM) content, particle size distribution, and the proportion of organic matter in the soil. Overall 85 soil samples from three sites in the Moscow megalopolis with different levels of PTM pollution were collected for the device validation: the Repin&amp;#8217;s square in the city-center (high level), the RUDN University campus (medium level), and the urban forest in Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy (low level).&amp;#160;&lt;br&gt;Soil samples were collected from 0-10 cm depth, analyzed for moisture content and bulk density, dried, ground, sieved through a sieve with a 2 mm mesh diameter and analyzed by Olympus Vanta C device. Exposure time was 90 sec in the &quot;Soil&quot; mode. The ICP-OES measurements were taken by EPA 6010B. The carbon content was determined by Vario TOC Select (Elementar). Soil pH&lt;sub&gt;water&lt;/sub&gt; was determined by the potentiometric method. Further, all samples were divided into groups based on different particle size distributions: sand, loam, peat, and their mixtures. Finally, the samples were grouped by the PTM concentrations. International indices (IPI, PI&lt;sub&gt;Nemerow&lt;/sub&gt;, and PERI) were used to assess the accuracy of complex soil pollution. The correction factors were calculated for five PTMs (Cu, Ni, Zn, Pb, Cd).&amp;#160;&lt;br&gt;For sand, the pXRF-measured concentration corresponded to the ICP-OES result with the conversion factor K=1. The surplus of pXRF readings for samples with peat domination was 1.5-2, but the addition of mineral substrates (sand and loam) to the peat mixtures decreased the coefficient to 1.1-1.4. Among studied PTM, copper and lead had the most stable conversion factors, while other elements had different factors in different intervals of concentrations. However, for all studied elements, the pXRF-readings were unreliable at concentrations less than 5-10 ppm. The pollution indices calculated based on pXRF and ICP-OES data differed but in most cases corresponded to an equal level of contamination. Overall, the Olympus Vanta C portable XRF-analyzer is a promising device for the assessing and mapping of PTM pollution in highly heterogenic urban soils, but pXRF readings of samples with low PTM concentrations and high organic matter content require correction.&amp;#160;&lt;br&gt;The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation Project #19-77-300-12.&lt;/p&gt;