73 Changes in Sleep Negatively Impacts Next Day Inhibition Performance Among College Females
Authors: Nicholson Laura M , Ohanian Diana , Egbert Amy , Silton Becky , Bohnert Amy 
Published: December 2023

Objective:

Sleep is a restorative function that supports various aspects of well-being, including cognitive function. College students, especially females, report getting less sleep than recommended and report more irregular sleep patterns than their male counterparts. Inadequate and irregular sleep are associated with neuropsychological deficits including more impulsive responding in lab-based tasks. Although many lab-based experiments ask participants to report their sleep patterns, few studies have analyzed how potential changes in sleep affect their findings. Utilizing data from a previously collected study, this study aims to investigate relations between sleep (i.e., sleep duration and changes in sleep duration) and performance-based measures of inhibition among female college students.

Participants and Methods:

Participants (n = 39) were majority first-year students (Mage =19.27) and Caucasian (51%). Participants were recruited to participate in a larger study exploring how food commercials affect inhibitory control. Participants were randomized to each study condition (watching a food or non-food commercial) over two visits to the lab (T1 and T2). During both visits, they completed questionnaires asking about their 1) sleep duration the night before and 2) their “typical” sleep duration to capture changes in sleep duration. They also completed a computer-based stop signal task (SST) which required them to correctly identify healthy food images (stop signal accuracy [SSA] healthy) and unhealthy food images (SSA unhealthy) while inhibiting their response during a stop signal delay (SSD) which became increasingly more difficult (or delayed) as they successfully progressed. Since the main aim of the study was to explore the impact of sleep, analyses controlled for study condition. Analyses involving changes in sleep also accounted for sleep duration the night before the study visit.

Results:

On average, students reported being under slept the night before the lab visit, reporting that they got 38 minutes less sleep than their “typical” sleep (7 hrs 3 min). Hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that sleep duration the night before the lab visit was not associated with inhibition (i.e., SSA unhealthy, SSA healthy, SSD). In contrast, a greater change in sleep, or getting less sleep than “typical,” was associated with worsened inhibition across inhibition variables (SSA healthy, SSA unhealthy, SSD) above and beyond sleep duration at T1. At T2, only one analysis remained significant, such that getting less sleep than “typical” was associated with lower accuracy of appropriately identifying unhealthy images (SSA unhealthy) whereas other analyses only approached statistical significance.

Conclusions:

These findings suggest that changes in sleep, or getting less sleep than typical, may impact inhibition performance measured in a lab, even when accounting for how much sleep they got the night before. Specifically, getting less sleep than typical was associated with reduced accuracy in selecting unhealthy images, a finding that was consistent across two visits to the lab. These preliminary findings offer opportunities for lab-based experiments to investigate the role of sleep when measuring inhibition performance. Further, clinicians conducting neuropsychological assessments in clinical settings may benefit from assessing sleep the night before the appointment and determine if this represents a change from their typical sleep pattern.