Effect of Various Ancillary Operating Room Techniques on Wound Healing Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Authors:   LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, Dubin Jeremy A. , Hameed Daniel ,   LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, Bains Sandeep S. ,   LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, Board Tim ,   Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, United Kingdom, Nunley Ryan ,   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, Mont Michael A. ,   LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
Published: January 2024

Introduction: The successful management of wound healing after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on several aspects of ancillary intraoperative techniques and surgical variables. Many of these have been evaluated in a few recent reports. The prior reviews studied many aspects of wound healing and, for example, found lower risks of wound complications with barbed sutures compared with interrupted closure with non-barbed sutures, no differences in wound complications between adhesives, subcuticular sutures, staples, glue, or mesh adhesives for the closure of the skin layer, and that mesh adhesives may be associated with faster closing times compared to subcuticular sutures or staples in TKA. However, some topics that can be influenced by the surgeon were not covered in these previous reviews. Namely, the use of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, tourniquet application, management of intraoperative drains, surgical approach selection, and patellar handling techniques can all potentially influence wound healing. Therefore, in this comprehensive systematic review of the literature, we focused on these five factors that may influence wound healing. Specifically, we evaluated: (1) the impact of different DVT prophylaxis methods on wound healing and infection rates; (2) the role of tourniquet application on wound closure and potential infection risks; (3) the effects of intraoperative drain usage on wound healing; (4) the influence of different surgical approaches on wound closure and postoperative infection rates; and (5) the effects of varying patellar handling strategies on wound healing and infection rates. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase, was conducted to identify studies assessing auxiliary surgical techniques and their impact on wound healing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Relevant terms like “knee,” “arthroplasty,” and “wound healing” refined the search, which included English language publications until May 1, 2023. Independent screening by two authors and a third mediator facilitated the selection process, with 24 studies meeting the criteria. Assessment of these studies involved evaluating their evidence level and methodological quality using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). A comparison was made on wound healing outcomes in TKA, which included evaluating methodological quality parameters like sample sizes, follow-up durations, and clinical effect measurements. Data synthesis for the studies provided a comprehensive summary, categorizing them by evidence level. Results: There were seven reports on DVT prophylaxis that showed no statistically significant differences in wound complications among various treatment methods and medications in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with wound complication rates ranging from 0.25 to 1%, except that aspirin appeared to have lower wound complications rates in three recent studies than other methods. There were five reports on tourniquet application that showed a generally increased rate of wound complications, but no increase in deep infections. The five reports on intraoperative drain use showed that while there is an increase in total blood loss in the group with drains, ranging from 568ml to 1,856ml, compared to 119ml to 535ml in the no-drain group, there are no significant differences in wound complications, infection rates, or other postoperative outcomes such as swelling, deep vein thrombosis, and range of motion between the drain and no-drain groups. There were three studies on surgical approaches revealing no differences in wound complication rates between the mini-subvastus and medial parapatellar incisions. Also, the surgical variables of patella eversion and anterior tibial translation were only studied in one report. Conclusion: The current literature highlights the importance of using aspirin when possible for DVT prophylaxis and the possibility that tourniquets may lead to increased superficial wound complications. Drains or surgical approach do not appear to lead to wound problems. Surgical variables, such as patella eversion and anterior tibial translation, need more study.