Predictors of Arterial Occlusion Pressure in the Lower-Body Across Commonly Used Cuff Widths
Authors: Wedig Isaac , Lennox Isaac , McDaniel John , Durocher John , Petushek Erich , Elmer Steven 
Published: May 2023

For implementation of exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR), cuff pressures should be based on arterial occlusion pressure (AOP). Limb circumference and blood pressure have been identified as predictors of AOP and used to set appropriate exercising cuff pressures. However, it is unclear whether these predictors are consistent across BFR cuffs of varying width. Our purpose was to compare predictors of lower-body AOP in a variety of commonly utilized cuff widths. We hypothesized that limb circumference would be a stronger predictor when using narrower cuffs while blood pressure would be a stronger predictor when using wider cuffs.Healthy normotensive adults (women=44, men=76; age:23±4yrs; BMI:25±4) underwent measurements of thigh circumference (TC) and systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Lower-body AOP was assessed (via Doppler ultrasound) in the post-tibial artery in a seated position with an 11, 13, and 18cm wide pneumatic cuff. Models of hierarchical linear regression were constructed to predict AOP in each of the cuffs using TC, SBP, and DBP as predictor variables. A linear mixed effects model including AOP as the outcome variable was fit. The model included fixed effects of TC, SBP, DBP, cuff width, TC x cuff width, SBP x cuff width, and DBP x cuff width, and a random intercept for participants.AOP was 188±28, 170±20, and 152±15mmHg, for the 11, 13, and 18cm cuff, respectively. For the 11cm cuff, TC (β = 0.66, part = 3.46), SBP (β = 0.17, part = 0.48), and DBP (β = 0.21, part = 3.46) were significant predictors that explained 74% of AOP variability. For the 13cm cuff, TC (β = 0.56, part = 2.06), SBP (β = 0.25, part = 0.48), and DBP (β = 0.22, part = 0.59) were significant predictors that explained 69% of AOP variability. In the 18cm cuff, TC (β = 0.35, part = 0.10) and SBP (β = 0.48, part = 0.72) were significant predictors that explained 57% of the AOP variability. There were significant main effects of TC, SBP, DBP, and cuff width on AOP, and significant interactions of TC x cuff width and SBP x cuff width (all P<0.05). Results indicated that when using a narrow cuff, AOP was largely based on TC and when using a wider cuff, AOP was based mostly on SBP. Differences are likely due to wider cuffs transmitting pressures more efficiently into underlying soft tissues, thereby reducing the influence of TC on AOP and shifting greater influence towards blood pressure. Our results support and expand on previous work in a small sample (n=12) reporting that AOP depends more on TC as cuff width decreases. Together, these data provide evidence that cuff width should be considered when selecting factors to estimate AOP and establish appropriate pressures during lower-body BFR exercise.

This work was supported by the Michigan Tech Health Research Institute

This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.