Transient Otoacoustic Emissions and Auditory Brainstem Responses in Low-Risk Cohort of Newborn and One-Month-Old Infants: Assessment of Infant Auditory System Physiology in the Prenatal Alcohol in SIDS and Stillbirth Network Safe Passage Study
Authors: Sininger Yvonne S. , Condon Carmen G. , Hoffman Howard J. , Elliott Amy J. , Odendaal Hein J. , Burd Larry L. , Myers Michael M. , Fifer William P. 
Published: October 2017

Background:The Prenatal Alcohol and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Stillbirth Network, known as the “Safe Passage Study,” enrolled approximately 12,000 pregnant women from the United States and South Africa and followed the development of their babies through pregnancy
and the infant’s first year of life to investigate the role of prenatal alcohol exposure in the risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as stillbirth and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.Purpose:Auditory system tests were included in the
physiologic test battery used to study the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on neurophysiology and neurodevelopment, as well as potential causal relationships between neurodevelopmental disorders and SIDS and/or stillbirth. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe normative results
when using the auditory test battery applied.Research Design:The test battery included the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). Data were collected on individual ears of newborns and 1-month-old infants.Study Sample:From a cohort
of 6,070 with auditory system exams, a normative subsample of 325 infants were selected who were not exposed prenatally to alcohol, cigarette smoke, or drugs nor were they preterm or low birthweight. The subsample is small relative to the overall study because of strict criteria for no exposure
to substances known to be associated with SIDS or stillbirth and the exclusion of preterm and low birthweight infants. Expectant mothers were recruited from general maternity at two comprehensive clinical sites, in the northern plains in the United States and in Cape Town, South Africa. These
populations were selected for study because both were known to be at high-risk for SIDS and stillbirth.Data Collection and Analysis:ABR and TEOAE recordings were stored electronically. Peak latency and amplitude analysis of ABRs were determined by study personnel, and results were evaluated
for differences by age, sex, test site, race, and ear (left versus right).Results:TEOAE findings were consistent with existing literature including the increase in signal-to-noise (SNR) over the first month of life. The SNR increase is due to an increase in amplitude of the emission.
TEOAE amplitude asymmetry favoring the right ear was found, whereas SNR asymmetry was not, perhaps because of the small sample size. A nonsignificant trend toward larger responses in female babies was found; a result that is generally statistically significant in studies with larger samples.
Latencies were found to be shorter in ABRs elicited in the right ear with amplitudes that were slightly bigger on average. An expected decrease in wave V latency was observed from birth to 1-month of age, but the finding was of borderline significance (p = 0.058).Conclusions:One
month is a short time to judge development of the auditory system; however, the ABR and TEOAE findings were consistent with current literature. We conclude that the auditory system data acquired for the Safe Passage Study, as reflected in the data obtained from this cohort of “unexposed”
infants, is consistent with published reports of these auditory system measures in the general population.