Using Smartphone Sensor Data to Assess Inhibitory Control in the Wild: Longitudinal Study (Preprint)
Authors: Tseng Vincent WS , Costa Jean Dos Reis , Jung Malte F , Choudhury Tanzeem 
Published: June 2020

BACKGROUND

Inhibitory control, or inhibition, is one of the core executive functions of humans. It contributes to our attention, performance, and physical and mental well-being. Our inhibitory control is modulated by various factors and therefore fluctuates over time. Being able to continuously and unobtrusively assess our inhibitory control and understand the mediating factors may allow us to design intelligent systems that help manage our inhibitory control and ultimately our well-being.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate whether we can assess individuals’ inhibitory control using an unobtrusive and scalable approach to identify digital markers that are predictive of changes in inhibitory control.

METHODS

We developed InhibiSense, an app that passively collects the following information: users’ behaviors based on their phone use and sensor data, the ground truths of their inhibition control measured with stop-signal tasks (SSTs) and ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), and heart rate information transmitted from a wearable heart rate monitor (Polar H10). We conducted a 4-week in-the-wild study, where participants were asked to install InhibiSense on their phone and wear a Polar H10. We used generalized estimating equation (GEE) and gradient boosting tree models fitted with features extracted from participants’ phone use and sensor data to predict their stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), an objective metric used to measure an individual’s inhibitory control, and identify the predictive digital markers.

RESULTS

A total of 12 participants completed the study, and 2189 EMAs and SST responses were collected. The results from the GEE models suggest that the top digital markers positively associated with an individual’s SSRT include phone use burstiness (<i>P</i>=.005), the mean duration between 2 consecutive phone use sessions (<i>P</i>=.02), the change rate of battery level when the phone was not charged (<i>P</i>=.04), and the frequency of incoming calls (<i>P</i>=.03). The top digital markers negatively associated with SSRT include the standard deviation of acceleration (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), the frequency of short phone use sessions (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), the mean duration of incoming calls (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), the mean decibel level of ambient noise (<i>P</i>=.007), and the percentage of time in which the phone was connected to the internet through a mobile network (<i>P</i>=.001). No significant correlation between the participants’ objective and subjective measurement of inhibitory control was found.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified phone-based digital markers that were predictive of changes in inhibitory control and how they were positively or negatively associated with a person’s inhibitory control. The results of this study corroborate the findings of previous studies, which suggest that inhibitory control can be assessed continuously and unobtrusively in the wild. We discussed some potential applications of the system and how technological interventions can be designed to help manage inhibitory control.