Role of Bcl-2 Immunohistochemical Expression As An Independent Biological Prognostic Marker At Diagnosis of Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Authors: Bento Leyre , Macias Gabriela Rodriguez , Balsalobre Pascual , Gayoso Jorge , Gonzalez-Gascon y Marin Isabel , Muñoz-Martínez Cristina , Kwon Mi , Serrano David , Menárguez Javier , Diez Martin Jose Luis 
Published: October 2019

Abstract 4859

BACKGROUND:

Most patients with classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (CHL) are cured with primary treatment. However, a proportion of them fail to first line treatment needing to be rescued with subsequent lines of chemotherapy and/or autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT and allo-SCT, respectively). The identification of clinical and biological characteristics of these patients at diagnosis is still a challenge and most prognostic systems fail to identify a proportion of patients with worse prognosis. In this context, different groups are currently analyzing several biological markers as determinants of clinical outcome. It has been reported that Bcl-2 immunohistochemical expression in Hodgkinxs Reed Sternberg cells (HRSC) might confer a worse prognosis.

OBJETIVE:

To analyze clinical outcomes following 1st line chemotherapy according to Bcl-2 expression at diagnosis of CHL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

CHL patients, older than 16 years old, receiving at least 1 line of treatment, were retrospectively studied for Bcl-2 expression in diagnostic samples. For this purpose, tissue sections were immunostained and semiquantitatively assessed for this marker. Cumulative incidence (CI) of treatment failure, treatment failure free survival (TfFS) and overall survival (OS) were defined as primary outcomes. Treatment failure was considered when a different treatment regimen was set up due to relapse after CR or failing to achieve CR following 1st line.

RESULTS:

103 patients (55 Bcl-2 positive patients and 48 Bcl-2 negative patients) were analyzed. Main patient and clinical features are shown in Table 1. Both cohorts were well balanced for the main prognostic factors. At a median follow up of 36m (2-221), 34m (2-140) for Bcl-2 negative patients and 38m (4.5-221) for Bcl-2 positive patients, CI of 3 years treatment failure was 19% and 50% for the negative and positive cohorts, respectively (p=0.02). 3 years TfFS after diagnosis was 75% for Bcl-2 negative patients vs 47% for Bcl-2 positive patients (p=0.1). Within the cohort of Bcl-2 negative patients, 9/48 (19%) underwent auto-SCT as part of rescue treatment while 18/55 (33%) of Bcl-2 positive patients received an SCT (13 auto-SCT and 5 allo-SCT) and 3 of them, a second SCT (allo) for the treatment of post-auto-SCT relapse. 3 years OS was 84.5% for negative and 86% for positive patients (p=NS).

CONCLUSIONS:

According to these preliminary results, Bcl-2 expression in HRSC at diagnosis may constitute an independent biological prognostic marker in CHL patients, seemingly associated with worse outcome and need of second line chemotherapy. More studies and a longer follow up is needed in order to confirm that aggressive treatment strategies such as SCT may overcome the negative impact in survival of Bcl-2 expression in this population.

Disclosures:

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.