Health-related quality of life in patients treated with gemcitabine/cisplatin and durvalumab ± tremelimumab in chemotherapy-naïve advanced biliary tract cancer.
Authors: Kim Jin Won , Yoon Jeesun , Lee Kyung-Hun , Lee Dae-Won , Bang Ju-Hee , Nam Ah-Rong , Oh Kyoung-Seok , Kim Jae-Min , Kim Tae-Yong , Oh Do-Youn 
Published: June 2022

4117

Background: In the phase 2 (NCT03046862), gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) and durvalumab (D) ± tremelimumab (T) in chemotherapy-naïve advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) showed a high objective response rate and durable clinical benefit. Based on this study, phase 3 trial (TOPAZ-1, NCT03875235) has been conducted and the positive result for adding D to GemCis has been reported. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for adding immunotherapy to cytotoxic chemotherapy in BTC has not been reported yet. We present HRQoL results from the phase 2 study. Methods: In this study, treatment-naïve patients with unresectable or recurrent BTC were enrolled into three cohorts. Patients received one cycle of GemCis followed by GemCis plus D and T (cohort 1) or, starting with the first cycle, received GemCis plus D (cohort 2) or GemCis plus D and T (cohort 3). The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and BIL21 were administered at baseline and every cycle throughout treatment. Change from baseline to post-2 cycles and deterioration of HRQoL (≥10 points change) were analysed. Results: At data cut-off (March 22, 2021), 126 patients (32 in cohort 1, 47 in cohort 2, 47 in cohort 3) were included for this analysis. Compliance for QLQ was very high ( > 90 %) at all time points. C30 global health status (GHS) scores remained stable at all time points and from baseline to post 2 cycles (mean [95% CI] change, 2.66 [-1.10‒6.42]), with greater improvements observed in patients with responder (a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)) (3.60 [-1.27 to 8.47]) compared to non-responder (stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) (0.66 [-5.19 to 6.51]). For the overall cohort, functioning scales also remained stable from baseline to post 2 cycles. Nausea/vomiting (8.4 [4.45 to 12.36]), dyspnea (7.28 [2.17 to 12.4]), constipation (9.24 [3.35 to 15.13]), financial difficulties (5.53 [1.65 to 9.41]) in C30 and eating (5.53 [1.65 to 9.41]), tiredness (5.42 [1.23 to 9.6]), treatment side effects (7.98 [1.15 to 14.81] in BIL21 were worse at post 2 cycles. However, pain (-7.14 [-12.24 to -2.04]), diarrhea (-4.48 [-8.86 to -0.1]) in C30 and jaundice (-5.51 [-9.26 to -1.76]), pain (-6.02 [-9.7 to -2.34] in BIL21 were improved and more improvement was shown in responder compared to non-responder. Regarding deterioration of C30 GHS, median deterioration-free survival (months [95% CI]) was 4.14 (2.66-6.47) in all cohorts and there was no difference between responder (3.68 [2.27-7.92]) and non-responder (5.59 [2.73-9.46], Hazard ratio = 1.00 [95% CI, 0.62-1.61], p = 0.997). There was no difference among 3 cohorts. Conclusions: GemCis plus D ± T in chemotherapy-naïve advanced BTC generally preserved HRQoL and improved some symptom scales such as jaundice and pain although chemotherapy related symptom scales were worse.