Osteoblast Proliferation and Differentiation on Dentin Slices Are Modulated by Pretreatment of the Surface With Tetracycline or Osteoclasts
Authors: Schwartz Z. , Lohmann C.H. , Wieland M. , Cochran D.L. , Dean D.D. , Textor M. , Bonewald L.F. , Boyan B.D. 
Published: February 2005

Background: Implant surface roughness and chemical composition, as well as other factors, affect the ability of osteogenic cells to form bone adjacent to an implant. The same principles may also apply to the tooth root and some reports have shown that surface modification of the root may lead to improved restoration of the periodontal apparatus. The most common of these surface modification techniques involves demineralization with citric acid or treatment with tetracycline to expose collagen fibrils. In addition, during normal bone remodeling, osteoclasts demineralize the extracellular matrix, leaving resorption pits and exposed collagen fibrils. In this study, the effect of different dentin surface‐preparation techniques on osteoblasts were compared.

Methods: Slices of sperm whale dentin were mechanically polished and surfaces were treated with tetracycline‐HCl (TCN) or were cultured with mouse bone marrow cells to create a surface with osteoclast (OC) resorption pits or left untreated. Profilometry, x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to evaluate the 3 different dentin surfaces. MG63 osteoblast‐like cells were cultured on the 3 different surfaces and the effect of dentin surface preparation technique on MG63 cell proliferation (cell number), differentiaton (alkaline phosphatase specific activity of isolated cells and cell layer lysates; osteocalcin production), and local factor production (transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β1 and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) compared.

Results: Profilometry showed the polished and TCN surfaces were smooth with comparable Ra values, whereas the OC surfaces were slightly rougher due to resorption pits which covered 3.7% of the surface. XPS measurements showed that TCN treatment reduced the Ca and P content of the surface, indicating that it had dissolved the mineral. Osteoclast‐resorption also reduced the Ca and P content, but to a lesser extent. MG63 cell proliferation on polished dentin and tissue culture polystyrene was equivalent. In contrast, cells grown on the TCN‐ and OC‐treated surfaces exhibited increased proliferation. No effect of surface treatment on cell alkaline phosphatase activity was observed, but activity in the cell layer lysates was increased on the TCN‐ and OC‐treated surfaces. Osteocalcin production was reduced on all dentin surfaces, but the greatest reduction was found on the TCN‐treated surface. Production of both TGF‐β1 and PGE2 was increased on the treated surfaces. All effects were greatest in cultures grown on the TCN‐treated dentin.

Conclusions: These data indicate that demineralization of the dentin surface promotes proliferation of osteoblasts and early differentiation events like production of alkaline phosphatase and autocrine mediators such as PGE2 and TGF‐β1. However, later differentiation events like osteocalcin production are decreased. Osteoclast‐mediated bone resorption elicits similar responses; less than 4% of the dentin surface resulted in approximately 75% of the response caused by TCN treatment. These observations suggest that greater attention should be paid to the effects of osteoclastic resorption in designing methods for enhancing bone and cementum formation adjacent to root surfaces. J Periodontol 2000;71:586‐597.