Development of an Onboard Urea Electrolyser to Reduce NOx Emissions in Vehicles By Enhancing the Selective Catalytic Reduction with the Produced H2 and NH3
Authors: Chmielarz Jagoda Justyna , Morawietz Tobias , Häßner Manuel , Gago Aldo Saul , Friedrich K. Andreas 
Published: August 2024

In the persistent pursuit of reducing nitrogen oxide emissions from diesel exhaust, challenges arise in achieving optimal performance at lower temperatures, especially in urban driving conditions. This research focuses on a pragmatic approach – development of an onboard urea electrolyser using diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) as the hydrogen-rich carrier. The primary goal is to enhance the NOx reduction efficiency at temperatures below 200oC by providing the electrolyser products – hydrogen and ammonia [1]. The reason behind this innovation lies in recognising DEF as a viable electrolyte, offering both safety and a promise of performance increase due to splitting of urea instead of water. Beyond the contribution to NOx reduction, this approach aligns with the broader societal and political imperatives of integrating cleaner energy solutions within the automotive sector. However, the development of a functional urea electrolyser involves certain complexities. The key considerations are the material stability under operating conditions, anode catalyst dissolution in DEF, mass transport limitations, and the reduction of relatively high cathode overpotentials. A notable aspect of our research involves addressing these challenges in scenarios both with and without potassium hydroxide alongside DEF, requiring a nuanced understanding of the electrochemical processes involved. Additionally, weight, packaging, and system integration play an important role in the development of an onboard urea electrolyser.

This study systematically explores these challenges to devise a comprehensive understanding of the underlying electrochemical processes involved as well as the integration and operation strategy. The research methodology adopts single cell tests for which activation and measurement protocols have been established to achieve representative and comparable performance curve recordings and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data. Additionally, to various operating conditions of the electrolyte, the cell components screening adds to a considerable effort of this study. We explore the influence on the materials and design of the bipolar plates (BP) and porous transport layers (PTL); electrode performance and durability as well as the membrane selection. Within this study we consider anion exchange membranes (AEM) and bipolar membranes (BPM) for the performance comparison. Adopting both catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) and catalyst-coated substrate (CCS) approaches enables for examination of electrode preparation techniques and their influence on performance of the electrolysis cell. The initial results are promising, especially when employing 1 M KOH in the DEF electrolyte at 70oC, reaching 0.85 A cm-1 at 2 V. The respective performance curve is presented in Figure 1., together with a diagram of the electrolyser system integration into an existing Diesel exhaust line.

This research represents a practical stride towards realising the denitrification of transportation sector especially in city cycle driving when the exhaust gases temperature is too low for the state-of-the-art SCR systems. By addressing identified challenges and optimising key parameters, our study lays a robust foundation for the scalable implementation of a functional urea electrolyser for transport applications and a basic understanding of the electrochemical processes behind the performance and stability of such a system.

Figure 1.

Depicts a recorded polarisation curve of a single cell using an anion exchange membrane (AEM) and nickel catalyst anode fed DEF and 1 M KOH as an electrolyte at 70oC. Below, the suggested integration of the electrolyser into latest generation Diesel exhaust aftertreatment system. It includes diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), selective Diesel particulate filter (sDPF), hydrogen supported denitrification catalyst ‘H2-deNOx’ and finally a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) step.

Reference:

Esser, E., Kureti, S., Heckemüller, L., Todt, A. et al., "Low-Temperature NOx Reduction by H2 in Diesel Engine Exhaust," SAE Int. J. Adv. & Curr. Prac. in Mobility 4(5):1828-1845, 2022, https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-01-0538.

Figure 1