SPORAZUM O PRIZNANJU KRIVNJE
Authors: Musić Almin 
Published: February 2025

&lt;p&gt;Institut sporazum o priznanju krivnje predstavlja dogovor između&lt;br /&gt;osumnjičenog, odnosno optuženog sa tužiocem o uvjetima priznanja&lt;br /&gt;krivnje za ono djelo za koje se tereti, a koji je kao takav zastupljen u&lt;br /&gt;na&amp;scaron;em zakonodavstvu Ovaj, uvijek aktualan institut bitno je istražiti zbog njegove sve &amp;scaron;ire upotrebe u praksi Cilj je ukazati na korisnost ovog&lt;br /&gt;instituta i predstaviti prikupljene podatke o količini upotrebe sporazuma&lt;br /&gt;u praksi na teritorijalnom području Zeničko-dobojskog kantona Riječ je&lt;br /&gt;dakle o institutu koji nije svojstven izvornom bosanskohercegovačkom&lt;br /&gt;krivično-procensom zakonodavstvu Sami institut je djelomično preuzet&lt;br /&gt;iz anglo-saksonskog sistema tj iz pravnog sistema SAD-a tokom reforme&lt;br /&gt;krivičnog zakonodavstva koja je okončana 2003godine Rad istražuje i&lt;br /&gt;analizira historijski razvoj i primjenu ovog instituta u zakonodavstvu prije svega SAD-a te način na koji je ovaj institut prihvaćen u zemljama&lt;br /&gt;evropsko-kontinentalnog pravnog sistema sa posebnim akcentom na bosanskohercegovačko zakonodavstvo Nadalje, u radu su istraženi i prikupljeni statistički podaci koji se odnose na upotrebu ovog instituta na&lt;br /&gt;području Zeničko-dobojskog kantona u slučajevima koje je vodilo Kantonalno tužilastvo Rad istražuje i analizira način nastanka sporazuma kao&lt;br /&gt;takvog, te na koji način je izvr&amp;scaron;ena recepcija ovog instituta na području&lt;br /&gt;Evrope i na koncu kako je zapravo Bosna i Hercegovina preuzela institut&lt;br /&gt;i koji je obim njegove upotrebe, striktno na području Zeničko-dobojskog&lt;br /&gt;kantona&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The plea agreement institute represents an arrangement between&lt;br /&gt;the accused or defendant and the prosecutor regarding the conditions of&lt;br /&gt;admitting guilt for the offense they are charged with, as established in our&lt;br /&gt;legislation This institute, which remains relevant, is important to explore&lt;br /&gt;due to its increasingly widespread use in practice The aim is to highlight&lt;br /&gt;the usefulness of this institute and present collected data on the extent of&lt;br /&gt;plea agreement usage in practice within the Zeničko-dobojski canton This&lt;br /&gt;institute is not inherent to the original Bosnian-Herzegovinian criminal&lt;br /&gt;procedural legislation It has been partially adopted from the Anglo-Saxon&lt;br /&gt;system, specifically from the legal system of the USA during the criminal&lt;br /&gt;law reform that concluded in 2003 The paper examines and analyzes the&lt;br /&gt;historical development and application of this institute primarily in US&lt;br /&gt;legislation, as well as how this institute has been accepted in countries with&lt;br /&gt;a European continental legal system, with a particular focus on BosnianHerzegovinian legislation Furthermore, the paper investigates and collects&lt;br /&gt;statistical data related to the use of this institute in the Zeničko-dobojski&lt;br /&gt;canton, in cases handled by the Cantonal Prosecutor&amp;rsquo;s Office It explores&lt;br /&gt;and analyzes the formation of the plea agreement as such, the reception of&lt;br /&gt;this institute in Europe, and ultimately how Bosnia and Herzegovina has&lt;br /&gt;adopted the institute and the extent of its use specifically in the Zeničkodobojski canton&lt;/p&gt;