Abstract PO2-16-04: Proteogenomic characterization of non-luminal A versus luminal A breast cancer tumor cells enriched by laser microdissection
Authors: Kumar Praveen Kumar Raj , Lin Xiaoying , Liu Tao , Sturtz Lori , Gritsenko Marina , Petyuk Vladislav , Sagendorf Tyler , Deyarmin Brenda , Liu Jianfang , Praveen-Kumar Anupama , Wang Guisong , McDermott Jason , Shukla Anil , Moore Ronald , Monroe Matthew , Webb-Robertson Bobbie-Jo , Hooke Jeffrey , Fantacone-Campbell Leigh , Mostoller Brad , Kvecher Leonid , Kane Jennifer , Melley Jennifer , Somiari Stella , Soon-Shiong Patrick , Smith Richard , Mural Richard , Rodland Karin , Shriver Craig , Kovatich Albert , Hu Hai 
Published: May 2024

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is classified into four widely-accepted intrinsic subtypes based on PAM (Prediction Analysis of Microarray) 50 gene expression profiles: Luminal A (LumA), Luminal B (LumB), Her2-enriched (Her2) and basal-like (Basal). Recent multi-omic studies of human BC have identified many potential therapeutic biomarkers for these subtypes and have also revealed the extensive molecular heterogeneity of the disease. Patients with LumA tumors generally have better outcomes because these tumors are typically slower-growing and responsive to hormone therapy. However, there is still considerable variation in the clinical outcomes of patients with non-LumA tumors. Here, we strive to understand the proteogenomic characteristics of intrinsically-defined non-LumA tumors in reference to LumA tumors.

Methods: A total of 117 retrospectively-collected, untreated primary breast tumor specimens, with a focus on non-LumA subtypes, were selected from the Clinical Breast Care Project and consented using a HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved protocol. The study cohort had a median patient follow-up of 9.3 years, enabling clinical outcome-related analyses. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) subtyping was used to enrich the cohort with non-LumA subtypes. Breast tumors were embedded in OCT (Optimal Cutting Temperature) compound and processed by laser microdissection (LMD) to enrich for tumor cells. DNA, RNA, and protein were simultaneously extracted from each tumor using the illustra triplePrep kit. Paired-end RNA sequencing and whole genome sequencing (WGS) were performed for 117 and 99 tumors, respectively, using the Illumina HiSeq platform. Quantitative global proteomics and phosphoproteomic analyses were performed on 112 and 50 tumors, respectively, using isobaric TMT 6-plex labeling with the “universal reference” strategy.

Results: We observed significantly lower stromal, immune and microenvironment scores in non-basal-like tumors, especially the LumA subtype from LMD-processed samples, compared to that of the same tumors but bulk-processed in TCGA-breast cancer study. There was also significantly lower stromal gene expression in LMD LumA compared to TCGA LumA. Unlike a recent report on proteomics clustering of bulk-processed tumors, we did not observe a stromal-enriched cluster, probably because the use of LMD minimized stromal components. Many common patterns of somatic mutations were observed among non-LumA tumors, such as dominant TP53 mutations and 5q deletion, suggesting a potentially common cell-of-origin for non-LumA tumors, such as an ER negative cancer stem cell or progenitor cell for these tumor subtypes. Cell proliferation-associated genes were amplified and proliferation pathways strongly enriched in non-LumA tumors. In addition to this, we identified two distinct phosphoproteomic profiles for relapsed and relapse-free basal-like BC. Moreover, we also identified 17 differentially expressed phosphopeptides that could identify cases of relapsed and relapse-free basal-like BC with a significant difference in progression-free interval of surviving cases.

Conclusion: This study provides an integrated proteogenomic characterization of non-LumA vs LumA tumor specimens enriched for cancer cells. We identified many common features of non-LumA tumors and also identified phosphopeptides that could serve as potential biomarkers for less aggressive basal-like BC and possibly guide treatment selections.

Disclaimer: The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions or policies of USUHS, HJF, the DoD or the Departments of the Army, Navy or Air Force or the DOE or PNNL. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Citation Format: Praveen Kumar Raj Kumar, Xiaoying Lin, Tao Liu, Lori Sturtz, Marina Gritsenko, Vladislav Petyuk, Tyler Sagendorf, Brenda Deyarmin, Jianfang Liu, Anupama Praveen-Kumar, Guisong Wang, Jason McDermott, Anil Shukla, Ronald Moore, Matthew Monroe, Bobbie-Jo Webb-Robertson, Jeffrey Hooke, Leigh Fantacone-Campbell, Brad Mostoller, Leonid Kvecher, Jennifer Kane, Jennifer Melley, Stella Somiari, Patrick Soon-Shiong, Richard Smith, Richard Mural, Karin Rodland, Craig Shriver, Albert Kovatich, Hai Hu. Proteogenomic characterization of non-luminal A versus luminal A breast cancer tumor cells enriched by laser microdissection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-16-04.