Understanding fluvial aggradation styles through physical modelling: Are we able to distinguish changes in water discharge and/or sediment supply (upstream drivers) from changes in base-level (downstream forcing) on river aggradation? &#160;
Authors: Watkins Stephen E. , Simpson Guy , Guerit Laure , Arlaud Frédéric , Marguin Valentin , Prieur Marine , Sharma Nikhil , Tremblin Maxime , Valero Luis , Zaki Abdallah S. , Castelltort Sébastien 
Published: March 2021

&lt;p&gt;Fluvial stratigraphy is the product of changes in Earth&amp;#8217;s history and inverting this record has often resulted in interpretations associated with changes in base-level caused by sea-level and/or basement subsidence (downstream drivers).&amp;#160; Similarly, environmental perturbations occurring in the upstream reaches of a fluvial system (i.e., the source region), such as climate driven changes of water discharge and/or perturbations of sediment supplied to rivers (upstream drivers), can also drive river bed evolution.&amp;#160; Therefore, both changes in upstream and downstream drivers can cause a river&amp;#8217;s equilibrium profile to respond and adjust through aggradation or degradation and hence generate stratigraphy.&amp;#160; Furthermore, it is likely to have changes in both upstream and downstream drivers simultaneously because both drivers may be themselves driven by the same factors e.g., astronomical cycles can drive both sea-level variation at the downstream end of fluvial systems and water discharge variations in the upstream end.&amp;#160; Deciphering the effects of the two drivers is vital to be able to comprehensively interpret the narrative of Earth&amp;#8217;s history preserved in fluvial successions.&amp;#160; We explore this issue with river flume experiments, where we are able to test the influence of both upstream and downstream drivers in isolation.&amp;#160; Furthermore, the small scale of physical modelling reduces the spatial and temporal timescales compared to natural systems and allows us to investigate how quickly the system responds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We use a narrow (0.05 m), long (2.25 m) flume with an initial gradient of zero.&amp;#160; Side-profile photos are taken throughout the experiment run, which are then analysed and fitted to monitor river bed evolution.&amp;#160; Top view photos record channel dimensions.&amp;#160; We use low flow rates (~&lt;600 ml/min) delivered by a peristaltic pump, to avoid turbulence and ensure bedload transport.&amp;#160; We have three aims with our experiments. Firstly, to investigate the role of changes in water discharge and sediment supply on equilibrium river profiles and the timescales associated.&amp;#160; Secondly, to&amp;#160;carry out a series of perturbation experiments varying downstream drivers (i.e., sea-level), which theoretically produce the same amount of aggradation as the upstream parameters we have used in order to compare.&amp;#160; Thirdly to vary both upstream and downstream parameters simultaneously to investigate the effects. Results to date suggest that the growing wedge maintains a relatively constant slope and that the slope of the wedge is dependent on sediment concentration (sediment discharge/water discharge), when using the same grain-size distribution for each experiment.&amp;#160; Furthermore, results imply that the system is highly sensitive to perturbations when the setup of the system is with relatively low sediment concentrations. Therefore, a greater magnitude of response is seen than with setups of higher sediment concentrations. Currently we are undergoing perturbation experiments and downstream perturbations, the results of which will also be presented here. Ultimately we will use our findings to upscale our experiments into a fully 3-D flume tank that will grow as an unconfined fan in order to observe any similarities and differences.&lt;/p&gt;