num_pages: 398
description: "Radical", like "democracy," is a term all are constrained to define for themselves. If Lens--concentrating on what radicals actually accomplish, rather than what they propose-- chooses to see their role "as an antidote to privilege," that is his privilege. Certainly one cannot argue with his proposition that it has been radicals, above all, who have been the "motor force" of American history, or his reiterated opinion that persons as richly individual as Sam Adams, Fanny Wright, John Brown, Gene Debs, Big Bill Haywood &amp; A.J. Muste have as many similarities as differences. This was an ambitious undertaking, amounting to little less than a retelling of the political story of our nation, &amp; Sidney Lens has encompassed his project more successfully than could have been expected. In line with his consistent emphasis upon connective rather than distinctive features of each age &amp; movement, he has been able to treat touchy subjects--the Communist Party, for instance--as comprehendingly as safe ones. He has also managed to provide broad guidelines &amp; some focus for understanding the as-yet unfinished stories of the Civil Rights &amp; Peace movements, &amp; the New Left. A vigorous job.--Kirkus (edited)
language: English
title: Radicalism in America
titlecomplete: Radicalism in America
genres: History
ratings_count: 14
publisher: Thomas Y. Crowell Company