num_pages: 1385
description: In late 2011, several members of the exterminationist "Holocaust Controversies" blog published a 570 page-long online study, which allegedly refutes three of our authors' monographs on the camps Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka (see Holocaust Handbooks vols. 8, 9 and 19). After 20 months of archival and library research, of editing and fact-checking by peer reviewers, Mattogno, Kues and Graf strike back with this massive two volume tome. The casual reader must be warned, though: This work cannot be read like a novel. It is a point-by-point response to the above-mentioned "Holocaust Controversies" bloggers' PDF file (accessible on their website) and can be understood only in that context. It also requires that the reader be familiar with the authors' three monographs on the Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka camps. In summarizing the book's conclusions, Jürgen Graf writes in his Epilogue: "[The bloggers of] Holocaust Controversies had all the time they needed to write their 'refutation.' They were assisted by a host of Holocaust historians [...]. It did not help them a bit. [...] Since the exterminationist position with regards to [gas chambers and eyewitnesses] is hopeless from the beginning, [blogger] Myers had myriads of opportunities to make a fool of himself, and he missed not a single one of them. [...] However, the most preposterous chapters of the pamphlet are undoubtedly the two last ones, written by [...] Roberto Muehlenkamp, who unsuccessfully tried to prove that during World War II the eternal laws of nature had to pause so that the evil Nazis could carry out their massacre in chemical slaughterhouses and get rid of the bodies without signifi cant use of fuel. [...] Mattogno [... made] mincemeat of his chapters [...]."
language: English
title: The "Extermination Camps" of "Aktion Reinhardt": An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious "Evidence," Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the "Holocaust Controversies" Bloggers
publisher: Castle Hill Publishers