num_pages: 216
description: We hold many assumptions about police workthat it is the responsibility of the state or that police officers are given the right to kill in the name of public safety or self-defense. But in The Killing Consensus  Graham Denyer Willis shows how in So Paulo Brazil killing and the arbitration of normal killing in the name of social order are actually conducted by two groupsthe police and organized crimeboth operating according to parallel logics of murder. Based on three years of ethnographic fieldwork Willis's book traces how homicide detectives categorize two types of the first resulting from resistance to police arrest (which is often broadly defined) and the second at the hands of a crime family' known as the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC). Death at the hands of police happens regularly while the PCCs centralized control and strict moral code among criminals has also routinized killing ironically making the city feel safer for most residents. In a fractured urban security environment where killing mirrors patterns of inequitable urbanization and historical exclusion along class gender and racial lines Denyer Willis's research finds that the citys cyclical periods of peace and violence can best be understood through an unspoken but mutually observed consensus on the right to kill. This consensus hinges on common notions and street-level practices of who can die where how and by whom revealing an empirically distinct configuration of authority that Denyer Willis calls sovereignty by consensus.
language: English
title: The Killing Consensus: Police, Organized Crime, and the Regulation of Life and Death in Urban Brazil
publisher: University of California Press