UNASSIGNED: Extreme variation in the reported incidence of @entity129 ( @entity129 ) disturbances suggests that @entity132 after orthognathic surgery have not been evaluated adequately. Here we review the reported incidence of @entity131 after orthognathic surgery and assess recently reported methods for evaluating @entity132 . A search was conducted of the English-language scientific literature published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2013 using the Limo KU Leuven search platform. Information on various aspects of assessing @entity131 was extracted from 61 reports. In 16 reports (26%), the incidence of injury was not indicated. Preoperative @entity129 status was not assessed in 22 reports (36%). The @entity129 assessor was described in detail in 21 reports (34%), while information on the training of the assessors was mentioned in only two reports (3%). Subjective evaluation was the most common method for assessing @entity51 . We conclude that the observed wide variation in the reported incidence of @entity131 is due to a lack of standardized assessment procedures and reporting. Thus, an international consensus meeting on this subject is needed in order to establish a standard-of-care method.

Systematic review of the incidence of @entity131 in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and the assessment of XXXX .

@entity129 :: ('MESH:D003389', 'Disease') :: ['IAN', 'inferior alveolar nerve'] @entity51 :: ('MESH:D009461', 'Disease') :: ['neurosensory deficit'] @entity131 :: ('MESH:D001930', 'Disease') :: ['IAN injury'] @entity132 :: ('MESH:D010468', 'Disease') :: ['neurosensory disturbances', 'sensory disturbances']
@entity132 :: (MESH:D010468,Disease) :: ['neurosensory disturbances']
