UNASSIGNED: Aim. To investigate differences in the efficacy of @entity13366 with @entity8786 drops in monosensitized and polysensitized @entity2023 @entity1 . Methods. The @entity1 enrolled in the study were treated for more than one year by @entity13366 ( @entity13366 ) using @entity8786 drops and were divided into a monosensitized group (n = 20) and a polysensitized group (n = 30). Total nasal symptom scores of @entity1 before and after @entity13366 were analyzed to evaluate the curative effect. The phylogenetic tree of dust mite allergens as well as other allergens that were tested by skin prick test was constructed to help the analysis. Results. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of @entity13366 between dust mite monosensitized and polysensitized @entity1 . Conclusions. Both dust mite monosensitized and polysensitized @entity1 could be cured by @entity13366 using @entity8786 drops. This study provides a reference for the selection of allergens to be used in immunotherapy for polysensitized @entity1984 @entity1 .

Efficacy of Sublingual Immunotherapy with @entity8786 Extract in Monosensitized and Polysensitized XXXX with @entity2023 : Clinical Observation and Analysis.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients'] @entity1984 :: ('MESH:D013734', 'Disease') :: ['AR'] @entity2023 :: ('MESH:D006255', 'Disease') :: ['allergic rhinitis'] @entity13366 :: ('MESH:D013362', 'Disease') :: ['SLIT', 'sublingual immunotherapy'] @entity8786 :: ('6954', 'Species') :: ['Dermatophagoides farinae']
@entity1 :: (9606,Species) :: ['Patients']
