In a retrospective study, the outcome of 87 @entity1 with @entity1756 was assessed. Follow-up included neurological examination, grading of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) of each @entity1 , and answering a psycho-social questionnaire. This questionnaire was answered by the @entity1 themselves or by a relative when the @entity1 was not able to answer. The follow-up was performed more than 12 months after the occurrence of @entity510 ( @entity510 ) in each @entity1 . The psycho-social questionnaire pertained to the degree of independence in everyday activities, household management, stress endurance, memory and concentration, social and leisure activities, social contacts, occupational status, and marital relationships. By summarizing the results of these domains, the quality of life was then determined using the method described by McKenna et al. @entity51 in the form of an incomplete paresis of the third cranial nerve and subjective @entity2414 and concentration were identified in 3.5 % and 34.5-39 % of the @entity1 , respectively. Of the 87 study @entity1 , 58.2 % were fully independent, 22.4 % were able to live at home with the support of their relatives, and 5 @entity1 were fully dependent. The occupational status of 21 @entity1 who were fully employed before @entity510 was unaffected, whereas 3 @entity1 were placed in positions with less responsibility, and 21 @entity1 were either unable to continue working, unemployed, or retired. The quality of life was not reduced in 57.2 %, while a mild reduction in the quality of life was reported by 23.8 % and a severe reduction by 19.0 % of the @entity1 . The ability of the initial Hunt and Hess grade, the initial Fisher grade, the extent of @entity51 , and the occupational status after @entity510 to predict the @entity1 's outcome was also evaluated. For statistical analysis, the Kendall-Tau-b-test for non-parametric correlations was applied. Significant correlations were found between the initial Hunt and Hess grade and the initial Fisher grade, between @entity51 and GOS, between quality of life and occupational outcome, as well as between the GOS and quality of life assessment, but not between initial Hunt and Hess grade and GOS or quality of life, between @entity51 and quality of life, between initial Hunt and Hess grade and occupational outcome, between initial Fisher grade and occupational outcome, and also not between initial Fisher grade and GOS or quality of life. Our results suggest that neither the initial Hunt _ Hess grade nor the initial Fisher grade are suitable parameters for predicting the outcome of @entity1 with @entity1756 . The fact that GOS and quality of life correlated significantly confirms the use of GOS as a simple method for evaluating @entity1 outcome, although it is not a grading system for evaluating functional disorders such as memory or subtle @entity73 .

Neurological and psychosocial outcome after XXXX , and the hunt and hess scale as a predictor of clinical outcome.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['participants', 'patients', 'patient'] @entity510 :: ('MESH:D013345', 'Disease') :: ['SAH', 'subarachnoid hemorrhage'] @entity73 :: ('MESH:D003072', 'Disease') :: ['cognitive impairments'] @entity51 :: ('MESH:D009461', 'Disease') :: ['Neurological deficits', 'neurological deficits'] @entity2414 :: ('MESH:D008569', 'Disease') :: ['reduction of memory'] @entity1756 :: ('MESH:D017542', 'Disease') :: ['ruptured intracranial aneurysm', 'ruptured intracranial aneurysms']
@entity510 :: (MESH:D013345,Disease) :: ['subarachnoid haemorrhage']
