PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of evisceration with primary orbital implant in @entity735 with and without fulminant @entity281 ( @entity3225 / @entity11472 ). METHODS: Retrospective nonrandomized comparative interventional case series. @entity1 with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 6 months were considered for inclusion. Thirty-four eyes of 34 @entity1 were included. Sixteen eyes were infective and 18 noninfective. Nonporous @entity1346 implants were used for all cases and the main outcome measure was successful retention of the primary implant. Major and minor complications and successful prosthesis fitting were also noted. RESULTS: All except 3 cases were able to retain the primary implant successfully and all but 2 @entity1 underwent successful prosthesis fitting. Major complications included implant extrusion in 3 cases (2 infective, 1 noninfective) and implant exposure in 1 case (noninfective). The difference in major complications between the groups was not statistically significant (p   =   0.66, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that evisceration with primary orbital implant is a feasible option in fulminant @entity3225 / @entity11472 and provides a good postoperative cosmetic outcome to the anophthalmic socket at an economical cost.

Evisceration with Primary Orbital Implant in Fulminant XXXX / @entity11472 .

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['Patients', 'patients'] @entity735 :: ('MESH:D005124', 'Disease') :: ['blind eyes'] @entity281 :: ('MESH:D007239', 'Disease') :: ['infection'] @entity1346 :: ('MESH:D012828', 'Chemical') :: ['silicone'] @entity11472 :: ('MESH:D010202', 'Disease') :: ['panophthalmitis'] @entity3225 :: ('MESH:D009877', 'Disease') :: ['endophthalmitis']
@entity3225 :: (MESH:D009877,Disease) :: ['Endophthalmitis']
