BACKGROUND: Genomic selection has been successfully implemented in plant and animal breeding programs to shorten generation intervals and accelerate genetic progress per unit of time. In practice, genomic selection can be used to improve several correlated traits simultaneously via multiple-trait prediction, which exploits correlations between traits. However, few studies have explored multiple-trait genomic selection. Our aim was to infer genetic correlations between three traits measured in broiler @entity1573 by exploring kinship matrices based on a linear combination of measures of pedigree and marker-based relatedness. A predictive assessment was used to gauge genetic correlations. METHODS: A multivariate genomic best linear unbiased prediction model was designed to combine information from pedigree and genome-wide markers in order to assess genetic correlations between three complex traits in @entity1573 , i.e. body weight at 35  days of age (BW), ultrasound area of breast meat (BM) and @entity18947 ( @entity18947 ). A dataset with 1351 birds that were genotyped with the 600  K Affymetrix platform was used. A kinship kernel (K) was constructed as K  =     G  +  (1  -    )A, where A is the numerator relationship matrix, measuring pedigree-based relatedness, and G is a genomic relationship matrix. The weight (  ) assigned to each source of information varied over the grid     =  (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1). Maximum likelihood estimates of heritability and genetic correlations were obtained at each   , and the "optimum"    was determined using cross-validation. RESULTS: Estimates of genetic correlations were affected by the weight placed on the source of information used to build K. For example, the genetic correlation between BW- @entity18947 and BM- @entity18947 changed markedly when    varied from 0 (only A used for measuring relatedness) to 1 (only genomic information used). As    increased, predictive correlations (correlation between observed phenotypes and predicted breeding values) increased and mean-squared predictive error decreased. However, the improvement in predictive ability was not monotonic, with an optimum found at some 0  <      <  1, i.e., when both sources of information were used together. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that multiple-trait prediction may benefit from combining pedigree and marker information. Also, it appeared that expected correlated responses to selection computed from standard theory may differ from realized responses. The predictive assessment provided a metric for performance evaluation as well as a means for expressing uncertainty of outcomes of multiple-trait selection.

A predictive assessment of genetic correlations between traits in XXXX using markers.

@entity1573 :: ('9031', 'Species') :: ['chickens'] @entity18947 :: ('MESH:D021181', 'Disease') :: ['HHP', 'hen-house egg production']
@entity1573 :: (9031,Species) :: ['chickens']
