OBJECTIVE: @entity1 who have abortions are at high risk of contraception discontinuation and subsequent unintended pregnancy. The objective of this analysis was to identify factors associated with choice of highly effective long-acting, @entity1871 -only contraceptive methods after abortion. STUDY DESIGN: @entity1 presenting for surgical abortion who selected the @entity2692 @entity16732 , the @entity1871 implant, or the @entity1871 injection (depot @entity11796 , or @entity12135 ) as their post-abortion contraceptives were recruited to participate in a one-year prospective cohort study. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression to identify factors associated with choosing long-acting, reversible contraceptives ( @entity16732 or implant) compared to @entity12135 . RESULTS: A total of 260 @entity1 , aged 18-45 years, enrolled in the study, 100 of whom chose the @entity16732 , 63 the implant, and 97 @entity12135 . The @entity1 were 24.9 years old on average; 36% were black and 29% were Latina. Fifty-nine percent had had a previous abortion, 66% a prior birth, and 55% were undergoing a second-trimester abortion. In multivariable analyses, compared with @entity12135 users, @entity1 who chose the @entity16732 or the implant were less likely to be currently experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV,) reported higher stress levels, weighed more, were more likely to have finished high school, to have used the pill before, and to report that counselors or doctors were helpful in making the decision (all significant at p<0.05, see text for relative risk ratios and confidence intervals.) In addition, @entity1 who chose the @entity16732 were less likely to be black (p<0.01,) and @entity1 who chose the implant were more likely to report that they would be unhappy to become pregnant within 6 months (p<0.05,) than @entity12135 users. CONCLUSION: A variety of factors including race/ethnicity, past contraceptive use, feelings towards pregnancy, stress and weight were different between @entity16365 and @entity12135 users. Notably, current IPV was associated with choice of @entity12135 over the @entity16732 or implant, implying that a desire to choose a hidden method may be important to some @entity1 and should be included in counseling. IMPLICATIONS: In contraceptive counseling, after screening for intimate partner violence, assessing @entity1 's stress, and taking a history about past contraceptive use, clinicians should discuss whether these factors might affect a @entity1 's choice of method.

Choice of the @entity2692 intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant or depot XXXX for contraception after aspiration abortion.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['women', 'Women', 'patient'] @entity11796 :: ('MESH:D017258', 'Chemical') :: ['medroxyprogesterone acetate'] @entity2692 :: ('MESH:D016912', 'Chemical') :: ['levonorgestrel'] @entity1871 :: ('CHEBI:59826', 'Chemical') :: ['progestin'] @entity16732 :: ('MESH:D058736', 'Disease') :: ['IUD'] @entity12135 :: ('MESH:C050795', 'Chemical') :: ['DMPA'] @entity16365 :: ('6364', 'Gene') :: ['LARC']
@entity11796 :: (MESH:D017258,Chemical) :: ['medroxyprogesterone acetate']
