OBJECTIVE: To evaluate urological interventions in @entity1 with @entity5028 in our collaborative experience at a tertiary referral centre. @entity1 AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected data set, consisting of all @entity1 that presented with @entity5028 at the Royal @entity1 's Hospital from August 2009 to September 2013. @entity1 who required urological intervention were identified and perioperative details were retrieved. RESULTS: Of the 49 @entity1 that presented with @entity5028 , 36 (73.5%) underwent urological interventions. The @entity1 were divided into three groups: planned hysterectomy (37 @entity1 ), planned conservative management (five) and undiagnosed @entity8052 (seven). In the planned hysterectomy group, 29 @entity1 underwent preoperative cystoscopy and ureteric catheter placement. In 10 @entity1 (34%), the placenta partially invaded the bladder and/or ureter, requiring urological repair. In the conservative management group, four underwent preoperative cystoscopy and ureteric catheter placement, and one case required closure of a cystotomy. Of the seven @entity1 with undiagnosed percreta, two were noted to have bladder involvement requiring repair at the time of Caesarean hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: @entity1 with @entity5028 frequently require urological intervention to prevent or repair injury to the urinary tract. These cases are best managed in specialist centres with multidisciplinary expertise including urologists and interventional radiologists.

The urologist's role in multidisciplinary management of XXXX .

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['women', 'Patients', 'patients', 'Women', 'PATIENTS'] @entity5028 :: ('MESH:D010922', 'Disease') :: ['placental adhesive disorders'] @entity8052 :: ('MESH:D010921', 'Disease') :: ['placenta percreta']
@entity8052 :: (MESH:D010921,Disease) :: ['placenta percreta']
