INTRODUCTION: Inactivated @entity9925 vaccine (IPV) introduction and phased oral @entity9925 vaccine (OPV) cessation are essential for eradication of polio. METHODS: Healthy 6-week old @entity1 in Bangladesh were randomized to one of five study arms: receipt of trivalent OPV (tOPV) or bivalent OPV (bOPV) at ages 6, 10 and 14 weeks, intramuscular IPV or intradermal one-fifth fractional dose IPV (f-IPV) at ages 6 and 14 weeks, or f-IPV at ages 6 and 14 weeks with bOPV at age 10 weeks (f-IPV/bOPV). All @entity1 received tOPV at age 18 weeks. RESULTS: Of 975 @entity1 randomized, 95% (922) completed follow-up. Type 1 seroconversion after 3 doses at 6, 10 and 14 weeks was higher with bOPV compared with tOPV (99% vs 94%, p=0.019). Seroconversions to types 1 and 3 after 2 IPV doses at ages 6 and 14 weeks were no different than after 3 doses of tOPV or bOPV at ages 6, 10 and 14 weeks. A priming response, seroconversion 1 week after IPV at 14 weeks among those who did not seroconvert after IPV at 6 weeks, was observed against @entity9925 types 1, 2 and 3 in 91%, 84% and 97%, respectively. Compared with IPV, f-IPV failed non-inferiority tests for seroconversion with 1 or 2 doses and priming after 1 dose. DISCUSSION: The findings demonstrate considerable priming with IPV at age 6 weeks, comparable immunogenicity of tOPV and bOPV, and inferior immunogenicity of one-fifth f-IPV compared with IPV. If IPV induced priming at age 6 weeks is similar to that at age 14 weeks, IPV could be administered at a younger age and possibly with a higher coverage.

Early priming with inactivated XXXX vaccine (IPV) and intradermal fractional dose IPV administered by a microneedle device: A randomized controlled trial.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['infants', 'participants'] @entity9925 :: ('138950', 'Species') :: ['poliovirus']
@entity9925 :: (138950,Species) :: ['poliovirus']
