AIM: To present our experience with emergency or programmed @entity887 of @entity359 . @entity1 AND METHODS: The retrospective study 1999-2000 included a total of 20 @entity1 with @entity3052 , five of whom had @entity1375 . Group I emergency @entity887 : 11 @entity1 age being 61.4    15.6 years and the size of @entity3052 8.2    2.8 cm presented retroperitoneal hemorrhage from @entity1409 . Two had a @entity548 . A transfusion of 3.4 blood units per @entity1 was performed for five @entity1 . A clinical and radiological follow-up was done by scanning during the first week and in one month. Group II preventive @entity887 : nine @entity1 , with age between 58.3    15.2 years and @entity5 size 5.2    2.2 cm, all asymptomatic. All successfully received a unilateral preventive @entity887 . A scan was performed one month later. RESULTS: Group I: the @entity887 was effective in 100% of @entity1 . No intraoperative incident was reported. After one month, the reduction in @entity5 volume was 40%. At eight months, a @entity1 underwent nephrectomy because of a new @entity174 , and another a second @entity887 after 14 months. The technical result was maintained in 83% of cases after 18 months. Two @entity1 developed HTA after @entity887 controlled by a single treatment, and five had limited @entity8 sequels. Group II: no intraoperative incidents and no postoperatively complications have been reported. One month after @entity887 , the reduction in @entity5 volume was 23%. After 24 months, @entity1 remained completely asymptomatic, no spontaneous @entity548 has been reported, no surgery has been performed, and no HTA has been described. Only one re- @entity887 was done at 20 months (artery duplicity). Limited @entity8 sequels were reported for one @entity1 but no @entity177 . CONCLUSIONS: The required @entity887 became the method of choice in emergency with excellent results and few complications at distance. Programmed @entity887 effectively prevented the risk of @entity548 , without impact on the renal function, with a low economic cost compared to hospitalization and emergency care. The significance of the observed @entity3052 -- @entity1375 association in our series requires a confrontation with more important cohorts.

[Preventive and emergency XXXX of @entity359 : our experience].

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients', 'patient', 'PATIENTS'] @entity1375 :: ('MESH:D007037', 'Disease') :: ['hypothyroidism'] @entity8 :: ('MESH:D007674', 'Disease') :: ['renal ischemic'] @entity548 :: ('MESH:D006470', 'Disease') :: ['bleeding', 'hemorrhagic shock'] @entity1409 :: ('MESH:D012422', 'Disease') :: ['spontaneous rupture'] @entity5 :: ('MESH:D009369', 'Disease') :: ['tumor'] @entity174 :: ('MESH:D050723', 'Disease') :: ['fracture'] @entity3052 :: ('MESH:D015470', 'Disease') :: ['AML'] @entity177 :: ('MESH:D051437', 'Disease') :: ['renal failure'] @entity887 :: ('MESH:D004617', 'Disease') :: ['embolization'] @entity359 :: ('MESH:D018207', 'Disease') :: ['angiomyolipomas']
@entity887 :: (MESH:D004617,Disease) :: ['embolization']
