Background. Controversies on the utility of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass (LMGB) in @entity6 ( @entity6 ) control still exist. Methods. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Review Manager was used to perform the meta-analysis and the @entity353 ( @entity353 ) and/or odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to evaluate the overall size effect. Results. The literature search identified 16 studies for systematic review and 15 articles for meta-analysis. Compared with LAGB, LSG, and LRYGB, LMGB showed significant @entity353 [ @entity353 , -6.58 (95% CI, -9.37, -3.79), P < 0.01 (LAGB); 2.86 (95% CI, 1.40, 5.83), P = 0.004 (LSG); 10.33 (95% CI, 4.30, 16.36), P < 0.01 (LRYGB)] and comparable/higher @entity6 remission results [86.2% versus 55.6%, P = 0.06 (LAGB); 89.1% versus 76.3%, P = 0.004 (LAGB); 93.4% versus 77.6%, P = 0.006 (LAGB)]; LMGB also had shorter learning curve and less operation time than LRYGB [ @entity353 , -35.2 (95% CI, -46.94, -23.46)]. Conclusions. LMGB appeared to be effective in @entity353 and @entity6 remission and noninferior to other bariatric surgeries. However, clinical utility of LMGB needs to be further validated by future prospective randomized controlled trials.

Efficacy of Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass for XXXX : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

@entity353 :: ('MESH:D015431', 'Disease') :: ['WMD', 'weight loss', 'weighted mean difference'] @entity6 :: ('MESH:D003920', 'Disease') :: ['weight loss and type 2 diabetes mellitus', 'T2DM']
@entity6 :: (MESH:D003920,Disease) :: ['Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus']
