@entity1 with a @entity1756 should be treated as soon as possible after the @entity548 to prevent rebleeding and to allow vigorous treatment of @entity63 events in case of @entity2553 . The choice of treatment, endovascular or surgical, should be based on the angio-architectural aspects of the @entity439 . 3D rotational subtraction angiography will more clearly show the @entity439 morphology and will therefore help in the decision-making process. If an @entity439 is suitable for endovascular treatment ('coiling'), this should be the treatment of first choice, as has been clarified in the ISAT study. Location of the @entity439 only influences the treatment decision in @entity439 located at the basilar artery bifurcation. These @entity439 are preferably treated by endovascular means. The long-term results of endovascular and surgical treatment are still the subject of debate. For both treatment modalities, re-growth of the treated @entity439 has been described, but solid comparative data is missing. In analogy with the ISAT, referral of @entity1 with a @entity1756 should be performed as soon as possible after the @entity548 . Preferably, this should be a hospital where neurosurgeons, interventional neuroradiologists, as well as neurologists (with expertise on medical treatment of @entity1 with a @entity510 ) collaborate.

Treatment of XXXX : implications of the ISAT on clipping versus coiling.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['Patients', 'patients'] @entity548 :: ('MESH:D006470', 'Disease') :: ['haemorrhage'] @entity63 :: ('MESH:D007511', 'Disease') :: ['ischemic'] @entity510 :: ('MESH:D013345', 'Disease') :: ['subarachnoid haemorrhage'] @entity439 :: ('MESH:D000783', 'Disease') :: ['aneurysms', 'aneurysm'] @entity2553 :: ('MESH:D020301', 'Disease') :: ['vasospasm'] @entity1756 :: ('MESH:D017542', 'Disease') :: ['ruptured intracranial aneurysm']
@entity1756 :: (MESH:D017542,Disease) :: ['ruptured intracranial aneurysms']
