UNASSIGNED: Background: To examine the differences in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in subjects with thin corneas and to correlate these with structural and functional parameters of @entity16 . @entity1 and Methods: One hundred and thirty @entity1 (130   eyes) with @entity2840 lower than 500     m were included in five groups in this cross-sectional observational study: 52 eyes with @entity725 ( @entity725 ), 19 eyes with normal tension @entity726 (NTG), 27 eyes with @entity2790 ( @entity2790 ), 21 @entity1 suspected of having @entity726 ( @entity1412 ), and 11 healthy subjects. The measurements were obtained with GAT and DCT in a masked fashion. The corrected GAT-IOP for @entity2840 ( @entity2840 ), the difference between DCT and GAT (  IOP = DCT-GAT) and corrected   IOP (corrected   IOP = DCT-corrected GAT) were calculated. Age, @entity5494 ( @entity5494 ) from the most recent reliable visual field examination, average retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFL), cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), and treatment status were recorded for statistical analysis. Results: In all of the subjects (n   =   130), the mean DCT, GAT and corrected GAT values were 17.6        3.4   mmHg, 13.2        3.8   mmHg, and 15.5        2.1   mmHg, respectively.   IOP and corrected   IOP were 4.4        2   mmHg and 1.7        2   mmHg, respectively.   IOP was correlated negatively with @entity5494 (rs   =   -0.32, p   <   0.0001) and average RNFL thickness (r   =   -0.46, p   <   0.0001) and positively with CDR (rs   =   0.50, p   <   0.0001). The mean IOP measured by GAT differed statistically significantly between eyes with @entity726 (n   =   71, @entity725 and NTG) and eyes without damage (n   =   59; @entity2790 , @entity1412 , and healthy) (p   <   0.0001), whereas the mean IOP by DCT did not (p   =   0.935). The mean   IOP values were also statistically significantly higher in the glaucomatous group, with and without correction for @entity2840 (p   <   0.001). OPA and @entity726 diagnoses statistically significantly predicted   IOP (R(2)   =   0.41, F2.127   =   47.46, p   <   0.0001). Conclusion: Greater underestimation of IOP by GAT was observed in the @entity735 with thin corneas. Performing DCT on @entity1 with thin corneas might be advantageous in establishing the need for more aggressive treatment.

[Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without XXXX in Thin Corneas].

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['participants', 'Patients', 'patients'] @entity725 :: ('MESH:C562750', 'Disease') :: ['POAG', 'primary open angle glaucoma'] @entity2840 :: ('MESH:C563262', 'Disease') :: ['central corneal thickness', 'CCT'] @entity5494 :: ('MESH:D010262', 'Disease') :: ['MD', 'mean deviation'] @entity16 :: ('MESH:D009422', 'Disease') :: ['glaucoma damage'] @entity726 :: ('MESH:D005901', 'Disease') :: ['glaucoma'] @entity735 :: ('MESH:D005124', 'Disease') :: ['glaucomatous eyes'] @entity2790 :: ('MESH:D009798', 'Disease') :: ['OHT', 'ocular hypertension'] @entity1412 :: ('MESH:D011125', 'Disease') :: ['GS']
@entity16 :: (MESH:D009422,Disease) :: ['Glaucomatous Damage']
