89 @entity1 with @entity174 of the orbital floor - both in isolation ( @entity8924 ) and combined with a complex @entity174 of the midregion of the face - were followed up for an average of 5 years. Particular attention was paid to the quantitative evaluation of binocular fusion, @entity892 and @entity9577 . Comparison of operated and conservatively treated @entity1 with @entity8924 led to the following conclusions with regard to indications for surgery: 1. It is not justified to regard either surgery or its postponement pending developments as obligatory in all cases. 2. Surgery is indicated by clinical, orthoptic and roentgenological findings as follows: a) In case of @entity9577 or roentgenological demonstration of prolapse, surgery is indicated independent of @entity892 . b) @entity892 outside the main field of view does not, in general, necessitate surgery. c) If there is @entity892 within the main field of view, surgery is indicated. It is generally accepted that orbital-floor @entity174 associated with complex mid-face @entity174 require early surgical treatment. The present investigation confirms this view.

[Operation indications of blow-out and midface XXXX ].

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients'] @entity174 :: ('MESH:D050723', 'Disease') :: ['fractures', 'fracture'] @entity9577 :: ('MESH:D015841', 'Disease') :: ['enophthalmos'] @entity8924 :: ('MESH:D009917', 'Disease') :: ['blow-out fractures'] @entity892 :: ('MESH:D004172', 'Disease') :: ['Diplopia', 'diplopia']
@entity174 :: (MESH:D050723,Disease) :: ['fractures']
