This paper examined three patterns of test performance on the Halstead Reitan Battery (HRB) and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R), including Fuld's formula, that differentiated @entity195 ( @entity195 ) from @entity66 , especially @entity9398 ( @entity9398 ). Study 1 and 2 utilized 12 @entity195 subjects and 13 subjects who had @entity63 ( @entity63 ). All of the subjects in this study were male. The severity of impairment was equated. A WAIS-R deterioration pattern was found for the @entity195 subjects, from which a formula was derived that correctly identified 84% of the subjects. The Fuld formula identified 76%. In regard to the HRB, Motor tests especially were less impaired for @entity195 subjects and the HRB formulas correctly identified about 92% of the subjects. A third study, using an entirely new sample, applied these formulas to 11 @entity195 and 28 @entity9398 subjects. The same rate of separation for the HRB formulas was found. Neither the WAIS formula, with the original cutting points, nor did the Fuld formula quite reach significance.

Neuropsychological test patterns in men for XXXX .

@entity63 :: ('MESH:D007511', 'Disease') :: ['transient ischemic attacks', 'TIAs'] @entity9398 :: ('MESH:D015161', 'Disease') :: ['MID', 'Multi-Infarct Dementia'] @entity66 :: ('MESH:D004194', 'Disease') :: ['cerebrovascular disease'] @entity195 :: ('MESH:D000544', 'Disease') :: ['AD', "Alzheimer's Disease"]
@entity9398 :: (MESH:D015161,Disease) :: ['Alzheimer's and multi-infarct dementia']
