PURPOSE: To compare the use of lubricant gel with @entity3303 versus lubricant gel without anesthetic in flexible cystoscopy in terms of @entity158 and tolerability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational non-randomized study, 72 @entity1 were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 38 @entity1 in whom @entity3303 gel 2% was used and group 2 included 34 @entity1 in whom lubricant gel without anesthetic was administered. The main variables analyzed were score in visual analogue scale (VAS) and score in Spanish @entity158 Questionnaire (SPQ). Student's t-test and Chi-square test were used to compare differences between 2 groups. The P values < .05% were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Mean age of @entity1 in group 1 was 64.50 _plusmn; 12.39 years and 67.79 _plusmn; 10.87 years in group 2 (P = .23). The distribution according to sex was 29 @entity1 and 9 @entity1 in group 1 and 25 @entity1 and 9 @entity1 in group 2 (P = .78). The total VAS score was 2.21 _plusmn; 2.05 in group 1 versus 1.59 _plusmn; 1.61 in group 2 (P = .16). In the SPQ, the current intensity value was 1.82 _plusmn; 0.86 in group 1 versus 1.53 _plusmn; 0.74 in group 2 (P = .14), and the total intensity value was 1.92 _plusmn; 1.86 in group 1 versus 1.03 _plusmn; 1.75 in group 2 (P = .04). The cost of gel with @entity3303 is 1.25 @entity7634 and gel without anesthetic 0.22 @entity7634 . CONCLUSION: The use of @entity3303 gel does not produce benefit in terms of @entity158 relief in flexible cystoscopy and also is costly.__nbsp.

Use of @entity3303 2% Gel Does Not Reduce XXXX during Flexible Cystoscopy and Is Not Cost-Effective.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['women', 'patients', 'men'] @entity3303 :: ('MESH:D008012', 'Chemical') :: ['lidocaine'] @entity7634 :: ('9319', 'Species') :: ['euro'] @entity158 :: ('MESH:D010146', 'Disease') :: ['Pain', 'pain']
@entity158 :: (MESH:D010146,Disease) :: ['Pain']
