PURPOSE: To compare ultrasonographic (US) and mammographic findings and @entity5 size measurements of @entity1137 ( @entity1137 ). MATERIAL AND METHODS: US diagnoses and mammographic findings were compared in 95 @entity1 with pure @entity1137 , including 46 palpable and 49 nonpalpable @entity5 . The diameters of @entity5 measured by mammography, US, and pathology were compared in 70 of the 95 @entity1 using scatter plots and correlation analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-two (86.3%) of the ILCs were correctly diagnosed as @entity5 , 5 (5.3%) were diagnosed as focal abnormality, and only 2 @entity1 had normal findings on US. The most common mammographic findings were a spiculated mass (57%) and a focal asymmetric density (15%). US correctly diagnosed 8 of 12 @entity1 with normal or equivocal mammographic findings. The correlation of @entity5 size assessment on imaging and pathology revealed that US measurements including the "halo" (r=0.69) was superior to that of mammography (r=0.59). ILCs larger than 30 mm were heavily underestimated by both methods. CONCLUSION: @entity5 was diagnosed on US in most of the @entity1 with @entity1137 . @entity5 measurement including the "halo" predicted @entity5 size most accurately. The correlation between imaging measurements and @entity5 diameter on histology was lower for ILCs than reported for populations of mixed @entity189 .

Ultrasonographic evaluation of XXXX .

@entity5 :: ('MESH:D009369', 'Disease') :: ['tumor', 'US tumor', 'Malignant tumor', 'malignant tumor', 'tumors'] @entity1137 :: ('MESH:D018275', 'Disease') :: ['ILC', 'invasive lobular carcinoma'] @entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients'] @entity189 :: ('MESH:D002277', 'Disease') :: ['carcinomas']
@entity1137 :: (MESH:D018275,Disease) :: ['invasive lobular carcinoma']
