OBJECTIVES: Define the impact and causes of non-adherent @entity6 ( @entity4989 ) @entity1 , possible solutions and the role of the different health care professionals involved in the treatment. DESIGN: Structured questionnaire rating by a two-round Delphi method. LOCATION: The study was conducted in the Primary Care settings. @entity1 : The expert panel consisted of renowned medical professionals with extensive experience in @entity6 . MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Assessment through a 9-point Likert scale, of the degree of agreement or disagreement on 131 items grouped into 4 blocks: impact; causes of nonadherence; diagnosis of non-adherence, and possible causes, solutions and role of the different professionals involved in adherence. RESULTS: The participation rate was 76.31%. The primary care health professionals agreed on 110 of the 131 proposals statements (84%), showing agreement on 102 items (77.9%) and disagreement in 8 (6.1%). Consensus was not reached on 21 items. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of adherence of @entity4989 @entity1 makes the achievement of therapeutic control difficult. The medical practice needs to have specific training and enough resources to reduce the impact of the lack of therapeutic compliance.

[Adherence of Type 2 XXXX approach: Current situation and possible solutions].

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients', 'PARTICIPANTS'] @entity6 :: ('MESH:D003920', 'Disease') :: ['diabetes', 'type-2 diabetes mellitus'] @entity4989 :: ('28508', 'Gene') :: ['DM2']
@entity6 :: (MESH:D003920,Disease) :: ['Diabetes Mellitus']
