RESEARCH DESIGN: Analysis of inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity. OBJECTIVE: To determine measurement properties of a Spanish version of The @entity772 Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A sample of 35 in- @entity1 with severe acquired @entity1545 . To test concurrent validity of the translated scale, the Glasgow @entity772 Scale (GSC) and @entity717 ( @entity717 ) were also administered. Two experts in the field were recruited to assess inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was good for total CRS-R scores (Cronbach a   =   0.973, p   =   0.001). Sub-scale analysis showed moderate-to-high inter-rater agreement. Total CRS-R scores correlated significantly (p   <   0.05) with total GCS (r   =   0.74) and @entity717 (r   =   0.54) scores, indicating acceptable concurrent validity. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of CRS-R can be administered reliably by trained and experienced examiners. CRS-R appears capable of differentiating @entity1 in Emergence from @entity47 (EMCS) or in @entity47 ( @entity47 ) from those in a Vegetative State (VS).

A Spanish validation of the XXXX Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients'] @entity1545 :: ('MESH:D020214', 'Disease') :: ['brain injury'] @entity772 :: ('MESH:D003128', 'Disease') :: ['Coma'] @entity47 :: ('MESH:D018458', 'Disease') :: ['MCS', 'Minimally Conscious State'] @entity717 :: ('MESH:D009069', 'Disease') :: ['Disability Rating Scale', 'DRS']
@entity772 :: (MESH:D003128,Disease) :: ['Coma']
