AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of step-up approach to @entity788 . METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 86 @entity1 treated by step-up approach from 1989 to 2009. Infection was confirmed by examination of aspirated material or by presence of free pancreatic gas at contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Conservative treatment was initially attempted in all @entity1 ; percutaneous catheter drainage was performed when conservative therapy failed; surgery was planned only if no clinical improvement was observed. Primary outcome was mortality. RESULTS: Fifteen @entity1 (17.4%) were successfully treated with conservative treatment only. Percutaneous catheter drainage was performed in 69 (80.2%). Eight @entity1 (9.3%) died, two at week 1 without drainage or surgery and six after percutaneous catheter drainage and surgery. Eleven @entity1 were converted to surgery (12.8%). Organ failure occurred in 59/86 (68.6%) and @entity177 in 25/86 (29.1%). Median (interquartile ranges) hospital stay and catheter dwell times were 13 (9-47) and 15 (7-34) days, respectively. There were 2.61 catheter problems and 1.68 catheter changes per @entity1 . CONCLUSIONS: The step-up approach is an effective and safe strategy for the treatment of @entity788 . Percutaneous drainage can avert the need for surgery in the majority of @entity1 .

Step-up approach to XXXX : a 20-year experience of percutaneous drainage in a single centre.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients', 'patient'] @entity788 :: ('MESH:D010190', 'Disease') :: ['infected necrotising pancreatitis'] @entity177 :: ('MESH:D051437', 'Disease') :: ['multiorgan failure']
@entity788 :: (MESH:D010190,Disease) :: ['infected necrotising pancreatitis']
