OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish if @entity1 experienced any difference in @entity158 , between coblation tonsillectomy and coblation tonsillotomy. DESIGN: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed. SETTING: District general hospital department of Otolaryngology. @entity1 : Eighteen @entity1 listed for tonsillectomy were recruited into the study. Each was randomly assigned either tonsillotomy or tonsillectomy in the right tonsil. The contralateral tonsil was removed by the other method. In the first 24-h period (while in hospital) the @entity1 were interviewed at 2, 5, 10 and 24 h to quantify the @entity158 they perceived in right and left sides. There was a four point visual analogue scoring system for monitoring @entity158 . The power of the study was 80%. In this study the @entity1 were their own controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analogue @entity158 scores were plotted against time and the area under the curves was calculated (AUC). RESULTS: The AUC mean difference was 0.47. A t-test for the difference gives a P-value of 0.85 and a 95% confidence interval for difference is -0.79 to 5.73, which clearly contains zero. Using AUC as a combined @entity158 score there is no statistically significant difference between tonsillotomy and tonsillectomy (power value of 80%). CONCLUSIONS: There is no demonstrable statistical difference between techniques when measuring @entity158 experienced by @entity1 in the 24-h postoperative period.

Double-blind randomized controlled study of coblation tonsillotomy versus coblation tonsillectomy on postoperative pain in XXXX .

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients', 'children', 'PARTICIPANTS'] @entity158 :: ('MESH:D010146', 'Disease') :: ['pain']
@entity1 :: (9606,Species) :: ['children']
