BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biofeedback therapy has been extensively used and accepted in @entity1241 , but reports of its efficiency vary. We evaluated feedback therapy efficiency when (a) selecting the @entity1 's subject of the therapy, and (b) customizing the therapy protocol used for each @entity1 . @entity1 AND METHODS: Fifty-three @entity1 with @entity1241 were selected for biofeedback training. The treatment program was customized for each @entity1 depending on the underlying dysfunction, the @entity1 's cooperative and learning attitude, and the @entity1 's progress. Biofeedback efficiency was measured using clinical scores, subjective satisfaction of the @entity1 , and manometry. RESULTS: Incontinent scores showed improvement in 66% of @entity1 and good improvement in 11% and 15%, respectively, indicating an overall excellent effect of the therapy. Subjective satisfaction was strongly correlated with the previous incontinent scores. Comparison of manometry parameters before and after biofeedback therapy, including maximum anal resting, maximum anal squeeze pressure, and maximum duration of the squeeze, all showed significant differences. In addition, the sensory threshold significantly decreased after biofeedback therapy. Clinical improvements were maintained during the following 12 months. CONCLUSION: Biofeedback improves objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function. Selection of @entity1 and customization of the therapy program increased biofeedback efficiency for the treatment of @entity1241 .

Customized biofeedback therapy improves results in XXXX .

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['PATIENTS', 'patients', 'patient'] @entity1241 :: ('MESH:D005242', 'Disease') :: ['fecal incontinence']
@entity1241 :: (MESH:D005242,Disease) :: ['fecal incontinence']
