BACKGROUND: Although the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for @entity14 has been demonstrated, the safety of laparoscopic pelvic exenteration (PE) with urinary diversion for @entity14 remains poorly studied. The present study aimed to examine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic PE in @entity1 with @entity14 . METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive @entity1 who underwent anterior or total PE with urinary diversion for @entity14 between July 2004 and April 2015 at our institution were included in the study. Perioperative outcomes were compared between @entity1 undergoing laparoscopic (n  =  13) and open (n  =  18) PE. RESULTS: There were no conversions to open surgery. The estimated @entity190 (930 vs. 3003  ml; P  =  0.001) and total volume of blood transfusion (0 vs. 1990  ml; P  =  0.002) were significantly lower in @entity1 undergoing laparoscopic compared with open PE. R0 resection was performed in all @entity1 . The operation time (laparoscopic, 829  min vs. open, 875  min; P  =  0.660), complication rate (laparoscopic, 61.5  % vs. open, 83.3  %; P  =  0.171), and postoperative hospital days (laparoscopic, 29  days vs. open, 33  days; P  =  0.356) were similar in both groups. Three @entity1 undergoing laparoscopic PE readmitted within 30  days due to ileus, although the rate of readmission did not differ significantly (laparoscopic, 23.1  % vs. open, 5.6  %; P  =  0.284). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic PE performed by experienced laparoscopic pelvic surgeons should be considered as a safe and preferred option in selected @entity1 with @entity14 , with a significant advantage in terms of reduced @entity190 compared with open surgery.

Safety of Laparoscopic Pelvic Exenteration with Urinary Diversion for XXXX .

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients'] @entity190 :: ('MESH:D006473', 'Disease') :: ['blood loss'] @entity14 :: ('MESH:D015179', 'Disease') :: ['colorectal malignancies', 'colorectal cancer']
@entity14 :: (MESH:D015179,Disease) :: ['Colorectal Malignancies']
