OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ovarian response to stimulation conducted for @entity52 treatment in @entity1 who have undergone conservative surgery for @entity46 . DESIGN: Retrospective study with prospective selection of @entity1 and controls. SETTING: University infertility clinic. @entity1 (S): A series of 374 @entity1 who underwent @entity52 ( @entity52 ). The study group consisted of 85 @entity1 with @entity43 who had undergone laparoscopic surgery in an attempt to become pregnant, but had failed within a year of surgery. The control group consisted of 289 @entity1 with @entity249 . INTERVENTION(S): @entity5044 . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Stimulation parameters, fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy rates were analyzed in both groups. RESULT(S): There was no significant difference between the two groups in stimulation parameters or @entity52 outcome. CONCLUSION(S): A total of 820 cycles were analyzed. A similar @entity52 -ET outcome was observed in @entity1 with @entity46 after ablation of @entity46 compared to @entity1 with tubal factors. In conclusion, @entity46 surgery by internal wall vaporization does not impair @entity52 outcome. The clinical pregnancy rate was respectively 37.4% and 34.6% in the @entity46 group and the control group.

Does XXXX impair the ovarian response to gonadotropin?

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['participants', 'women', 'patients', 'PATIENT'] @entity43 :: ('MESH:D010051', 'Disease') :: ['ovarian endometriomas'] @entity249 :: ('MESH:D007246', 'Disease') :: ['tubal factor infertility'] @entity5044 :: ('OMIM:143470', 'Disease') :: ['IVF-embryo transfer procedures'] @entity46 :: ('MESH:D004715', 'Disease') :: ['endometriomas', 'endometriosis', 'endometrioma'] @entity52 :: ('MESH:C566179', 'Disease') :: ['IVF', 'in vitro fertilization']
@entity43 :: (MESH:D010051,Disease) :: ['ovarian surgery for endometriomas']
