Passive samplers have been shown to be an inexpensive alternative to direct sampling. Diffusion denuders have been developed to measure the concentration of species such as @entity3265 ( @entity3655 ), which is in equilibrium with particulate @entity47437 . Conventional denuder sampling has required active sampling that inherently requires air pumps and, therefore, electrical power. To estimate emissions of @entity3655 from a fugitive source would require an array of active samplers and meteorological measurements to estimate the flux. A recently developed fabric denuder was configured in an open tube to passively sample @entity3655 flux. Passive and active samplers were collocated at a dairy farm at the California State University, Fresno, Agricultural Research Facility. During this comparison study, @entity3655 flux measurements were made at the dairy farm lagoon before and after the lagoon underwent acidification. Comparisons were made of the flux measurements obtained directly from the passive flux denuder and those calculated from an active filter pack sampler and wind velocity. The results show significant correlation between the two methods, although a correction factor needed to be applied to directly compare the two techniques. This passive sampling approach significantly reduces the cost and complexity of sampling and has the potential to economically develop a larger inventory base for ambient @entity3655 emissions.

A passive flux denuder for evaluating emissions of XXXX at a dairy farm.

@entity47437 :: ('MESH:C006568', 'Chemical') :: ['ammonium nitrate'] @entity3655 :: ('CHEBI:16134', 'Chemical') :: ['NH3'] @entity3265 :: ('MESH:D000641', 'Chemical') :: ['ammonia']
@entity3265 :: (MESH:D000641,Chemical) :: ['ammonia']
