PURPOSE: To compare @entity64 evaluations recommended by retina special-ists and neurologists for @entity732 ( @entity732 ). DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. METHODS: An anonymous survey was emailed to members of the American Academy of @entity16 Section listserv and vitreoretinal specialists registered with the American Academy of Ophthalmology. The survey was divided based on duration of symptoms before encounter: less than 12 hours, 24-48 hours, and more than 1 week. Institutional review board approval was obtained before data collection. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-eight surveys were completed (281 retinologists and 167 neurologists). Within 12 hours of @entity732 , most neurologists (75%) pursue a hospital-based evaluation, whereas the majority of retinologists (82%) pursue outpatient workup (P < 0.0001). Most neurologists (92%) and retinologists (98%) pursue outpatient @entity64 workup if symptoms have been present for more than 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologists pursue higher acuity care after @entity732 , whereas most retinologists order outpatient evaluations. Retina specialists should consider urgent @entity64 evaluation to mitigate @entity64 risk factors.

Practice Patterns After Acute XXXX .

@entity732 :: ('MESH:D015356', 'Disease') :: ['retinal artery occlusion', 'RAO'] @entity16 :: ('MESH:D009422', 'Disease') :: ['Neurology Stroke'] @entity64 :: ('MESH:D020521', 'Disease') :: ['stroke']
@entity732 :: (MESH:D015356,Disease) :: ['Embolic Retinal Artery Occlusion']
