BACKGROUND: @entity291 augmentation surgery is one of the least popular procedures among plastic surgeons; in contrast, it is by far one of the most gratifying procedures among @entity1 . In this article, the authors present a retrospective analysis of a surgeon's extensive experience with @entity291 implants. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed 134 @entity1 having @entity291 augmentation for cosmetic and reconstructive surgery in their practice from 2003 to 2015. All @entity1 were divided into two groups: primary cases and @entity1 who had previously been operated on and who were referred to our service as @entity1 who had complications after @entity291 augmentation surgery. The subfascial approach was the preferred approach by authors for all primary cases. The authors analyzed indications, complication rates, results, and pitfalls. Secondary cases were further divided into three groups according to the origin of the problem and some possible solutions. RESULTS: Subfascial @entity291 augmentation surgery is safe and easy to reproduce, with a short recovery period and a low complication rate (<1 percent). To achieve the best aesthetic results, surgeons should choose appropriate implants for each case. In secondary cases, fat grafting is a powerful tool and can be used alone or in combination with @entity291 implants. CONCLUSIONS: There are several groups of @entity1 seeking @entity291 augmentation surgery (e.g., bodybuilders, @entity1 , those with reconstructive problems). Therefore, treatment should be planned individually. The development of a new implant is necessary and should be based on detailed anatomical findings and in accordance with surgical techniques. The process is intriguing and rewarding. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Safety and Efficacy of Subfascial XXXX Augmentation.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients', 'women'] @entity291 :: ('9913', 'Species') :: ['calf', 'Calf']
@entity291 :: (9913,Species) :: ['Calf']
