UNASSIGNED: Definite accurate diagnosis for @entity3605 ( @entity3605 ) depends on neuropathologic examination of brain biopsy or autopsy. However, transmissible nature makes the invasive examination dangerous. This study was set to determine that the clinical features are for the diagnosis of @entity3605 through a comparison study. We compared clinical features of two cases with initial diagnosis of @entity13895 . One case was finally diagnosed as @entity13895 . According to World Health Organization diagnosis criteria, the other one, which had been diagnosed as probable @entity13895 , was confirmed as @entity14204 after long-term follow-up. Compared with the case of @entity13895 , the misdiagnosed case did not present typical electroencephalogram (EEG) and diffusion-weighted in magnetic resonance images (DWI) of @entity3605 . However, cerebrospinal fluid in the misdiagnosed @entity1 showed 14-3-3 protein positivity. The @entity1 conditions improved after treatment. Through this case comparison, we conclude that EEG and DWI are necessary for accurate diagnosis of @entity13895 . Further, long-term follow-up is crucial to diagnosis and treatment of @entity3605 .

Comparison Between Sporadic and Misdiagnosed XXXX : A Report of Two Cases.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patient'] @entity13895 :: ('MESH:C565143', 'Disease') :: ['definite sporadic CJD', 'sporadic CJD'] @entity14204 :: ('MESH:D020363', 'Disease') :: ['limbic encephalitis'] @entity3605 :: ('MESH:D007562', 'Disease') :: ['Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease', 'CJD']
@entity13895 :: (MESH:C565143,Disease) :: ['Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease']
