OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of advanced @entity652 at surveillance colonoscopy after polipectomy. To review the colonoscopic surveillance interval and to compare the prevalence of @entity652 in @entity1 with low-risk and high-risk @entity652 at screening colonoscopies. METHODS: A cohort retrospective study. It was used a database of colonoscopies performed between 1999 and 2012. Seven hundred and sixty @entity1 who had @entity652 at first colonoscopy were included (465 males and 295 females, mean age 62 years old). They were divided into two groups: group A, low-risk @entity652 , and group B, high-risk @entity652 . In each group, it was compared the presence of @entity652 in videocolonoscopies performed at 3 and 5 years. RESULTS: At the first colonoscopy 409 @entity1 (53.8%) belonged to group A and 351 (46.2%) than group B. In both groups the risk of new advanced @entity652 in endoscopic surveillance at 5years was similar to the control at 3 years. Comparing both groups, the risk of new advanced @entity652 in endoscopic surveillance at 3 years in group B was 1.96 times greater than in group A (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: At present, surveillance endoscopy is performed before the suggested interval. In both groups there were no statistically significant differences between surveillance control at 3 or 5 years. However, 62% of @entity1 in group B have developed new advanced @entity652 in endoscopic surveillance at 3 years. Therefore, it is recommended the endoscopic control with this interval.

[Endoscopic polypectomy of colorectal adenomas: Monitoring XXXX in order to review the colonoscopic surveillance interval].

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients'] @entity652 :: ('MESH:D000236', 'Disease') :: ['adenomas']
@entity1 :: (9606,Species) :: ['patients']
