PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare ovarian reserve between laparoscopic suturing and @entity162 techniques in @entity1 with @entity46 . METHODS: In a prospective randomized clinical trial, 109 @entity1 with @entity46 underwent laparoscopic cystectomy. @entity1 were then randomized to undergo hemostasis with either @entity162 (n  =  57) or suturing (n  =  52) technique. We evaluated the impact of surgery and hemostasis techniques on ovarian reserve using serum levels of anti-Mullerian hormone ( @entity248 ) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) that were measured preoperatively and at 3  months postoperatively. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics such as age and preoperative @entity248 and FSH levels were similar between the two study groups. At 3-month follow-up, in both groups, postoperative @entity248 levels were significantly lower and FSH levels were significantly higher than before surgery. The decline rate of @entity248 levels was significantly greater in the @entity162 (53.42      15.28) group than in the suturing group (15.94      18.55). Furthermore, @entity1 in the suturing group had higher @entity248 and lower FSH as compared with the other group (p  <  0.001). CONCLUSION: After laparoscopic stripping of @entity46 , intracorporeal suturing showed less @entity2670 compared with @entity162 . Therefore, hemostatic suturing technique may be considered as a better choice after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.

Comparing ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of endometriotic cysts and hemostasis achieved either by XXXX or suturing: a randomized clinical trial.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['women', 'Patients', 'patients'] @entity162 :: ('MESH:D001714', 'Disease') :: ['bipolar electrocoagulation', 'bipolar coagulation'] @entity248 :: ('268', 'Gene') :: ['AMH'] @entity46 :: ('MESH:D004715', 'Disease') :: ['endometrioma', 'unilateral endometrioma'] @entity2670 :: ('MESH:D010049', 'Disease') :: ['damage on ovarian reserve as']
@entity162 :: (MESH:D001714,Disease) :: ['bipolar coagulation']
