OBJECTIVE: To compare the advantages and disadvantages of two procedures: Roux-Y with enterostomy and Roux-Y with spur valve in the treatment of @entity2876 . METHODS: Twenty-four @entity1 with @entity2876 underwent hepatic portoenterostomy with percutaneous @entity10780 (Group A) and 24 @entity1 underwent Roux-Y with antireflux spur valve (Group B). Clinical data were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Ten @entity1 remained alive in the Group A. Among them, 9 survived without @entity1087 , the oldest one being 9-years old. One of the 9 @entity1 had portal @entity101 . The remaining one who survived with @entity1087 and portal @entity101 was 8-years old at follow up. Ten @entity1 in the Group B remained alive. Of them, 8 survived without @entity1087 and 2 with @entity1087 . CONCLUSIONS: Two surgical procedures had similar effects in preventing @entity255 , while spur valve has the benefit of quitting cutaneous enterostomy.

A comparison of spur valve and percutaneous enterostomy in Roux-Y portoenterostomy for XXXX .

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients'] @entity101 :: ('MESH:D006973', 'Disease') :: ['hypertension'] @entity1087 :: ('MESH:D007565', 'Disease') :: ['jaundice'] @entity2876 :: ('MESH:D001656', 'Disease') :: ['biliary atresia'] @entity10780 :: ('MESH:D007579', 'Disease') :: ['jejunal enterostomy'] @entity255 :: ('MESH:D002761', 'Disease') :: ['reflux cholangitis']
@entity2876 :: (MESH:D001656,Disease) :: ['biliary atresia']
