PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the outcome following different surgical treatment techniques in the treatment of peroneal @entity924 and to establish whether return to sports was achieved universally following the procedures. METHODS: A systematic review and best-evidence synthesis was performed. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for eligible studies. The last search was done in March 2015. Quality assessment of pooled data was performed using a modified @entity20413 scale and a best-evidence synthesis was performed. In total, 14 studies were included. RESULTS: Surgical treatment provides improvement in the post-operative AOFAS score (p  <  0.0001) and high satisfaction rates. The redislocation rate is less than 1.5  % at long-term follow-up. @entity1 treated with both groove deepening and @entity29552 repair have higher rates of return to sports than @entity1 treated with @entity29552 repair alone (p  =  0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of peroneal @entity924 provides good outcomes, high satisfaction and a quick return to sports. Rates in return to sports are significantly higher in @entity1 treated with both groove deepening and @entity29552 repair. To optimize treatment, the surgical management should involve increasing the superior peroneal tunnel volume by groove deepening and stabilizing the tendons by @entity29552 repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.

Return to sports and clinical outcomes in @entity1 treated for peroneal XXXX : a systematic review.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['Patients', 'patients'] @entity29552 :: ('6697', 'Gene') :: ['SPR'] @entity924 :: ('MESH:D052256', 'Disease') :: ['tendon dislocation'] @entity20413 :: ('MESH:D019568', 'Disease') :: ['Macleod']
@entity924 :: (MESH:D052256,Disease) :: ['tendon dislocation']
