OBJECTIVE: Echo-endoscopes are much stiffer and thicker than regular endoscopes. During the procedure of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedure, water irrigation is a very useful for imaging but very dangerous if the @entity1 receive the procedure under anesthesia without intubation. In this study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of @entity3810 ( @entity3727 ) ( <=70%) for EUS. METHODS: Among 4230 @entity1 who underwent EUS from December 2012 to December 2013, 347 out @entity1 who need irrigation during the procedure were enrolled and divided into Group A. Group A ( @entity3727 sedation group, n = 162) and Group B (no sedative group, n = 185). For Group A, @entity1 received @entity3727 by inhalation during the procedure. The mixture rate of @entity3727 and @entity3612 was 45-65% and controlled by nurses according to individual effect. The cardiorespiratory functions, procedure duration, complications, and visual analog scale (VAS) of the @entity1 and examiner satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: Both group had comparable diagnostic accuracy, but VAS of the @entity1 who received @entity3727 sedation was higher than that in Group B (7.5 vs. 4.5, P < 0.05) and the examiner procedural satisfaction ratings of Group A was also better than that of Group B (8.1 vs. 5.1, P < 0.05); Most @entity1 in Group A reported willingness to reconsider @entity3727 for a future EUS. No @entity358 occurred in this study. CONCLUSIONS: @entity3727 for EUS is comfortable, safe and feasible, especially for the procedures that need irrigation.

Safety and efficacy of XXXX for endoscopic ultrasound procedures that need irrigation.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients', 'patient'] @entity3727 :: ('CHEBI:17045', 'Chemical') :: ['N2O'] @entity358 :: ('MESH:D008171', 'Disease') :: ['pulmonary aspiration'] @entity3612 :: ('D013481', 'Chemical') :: ['O2'] @entity3810 :: ('MESH:D009609', 'Chemical') :: ['nitrous oxide']
@entity3810 :: (MESH:D009609,Chemical) :: ['nitrous oxide']
