OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and @entity1661 ( @entity1661 ) for locally advanced @entity5 (LACC)after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS: In a retrospective study, data were analyzed from @entity1 with FIGO stage @entity3847 -IIB @entity5 who underwent LRH or @entity1661 after NACT at Union Hospital, Wuhan, China, between January 2007 and August 2013.Perioperative outcomes and survival were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 99 @entity1 who underwent LRH and 30 who underwent @entity1661 were included. Compared with @entity1661 @entity1 , LRH @entity1 presented with @entity5 (P=0.013). Median operative time, number of harvested lymph nodes, and rate of positive surgical margins did not differ significantly between the groups, but LRH resulted in less @entity190 (median 300mL [range 20-1100] vs 375mL [100-1200]; P=0.027). There were two intraoperative complications and 23 @entity260 in the LRH group, and 12 @entity260 in the @entity1661 group. No conversions occurred in the LRH group; all complications were managed without severe sequelae. As of March 2014, recurrence had been noted for 6(6.1%) LRH @entity1 and 2 (6.7%) @entity1661 @entity1 . CONCLUSION: LRH was similar to @entity1661 in terms of safety, feasibility, and morbidity, with less @entity190 among @entity1 with LACC undergoing NACT. Long-term outcomes need to be documented.

Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced XXXX .

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['women', 'patients'] @entity5 :: ('MESH:D009369', 'Disease') :: ['lower-stage tumors', 'cervical cancer'] @entity190 :: ('MESH:D006473', 'Disease') :: ['blood loss'] @entity1661 :: ('MESH:D000008', 'Disease') :: ['ARH', 'abdominal radical hysterectomy'] @entity260 :: ('MESH:D011183', 'Disease') :: ['postoperative complications'] @entity3847 :: ('23542', 'Gene') :: ['IB2']
@entity5 :: (MESH:D009369,Disease) :: ['cervical cancer']
