OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy of endovascular embolization for @entity1 with endoscopically unmanageable acute nonvariceal @entity360 as well as the factors that may influence mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective study over a 4-year period including a historical cohort of 37 consecutive @entity1 (22 @entity1 ), with a mean age of 69.2 years (range, 22-93 years). In most cases (54%), the @entity548 stemmed from a gastrointestinal @entity1066 . Technical, primary clinical, and secondary clinical success rates, as well as complication rates, were calculated. Several clinical and angiographic parameters were compared to the early mortality rate using Kruskal-Wallis or Fisher tests. RESULTS: Technical, primary clinical, secondary clinical success rates, and complication rates were, respectively, 89.2%, 83.8%, 88.9%, and 10.8%. The early mortality rate was 32.4%. The APACHE II and @entity26972 II scores were strongly correlated with mortality (p=0.001 and p=0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endovascular embolization in @entity1 with endoscopically unmanageable acute nonvariceal @entity360 is effective. However, the mortality rate remains high because of the changes in the clinical condition of these @entity1 .

[Transcatheter embolization for endoscopically unmanageable acute nonvariceal XXXX ].

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients', 'men'] @entity548 :: ('MESH:D006470', 'Disease') :: ['hemorrhage'] @entity1066 :: ('MESH:D014456', 'Disease') :: ['ulcer'] @entity26972 :: ('OMIM:261100', 'Disease') :: ['IGS'] @entity360 :: ('MESH:D006471', 'Disease') :: ['upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage']
@entity360 :: (MESH:D006471,Disease) :: ['upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage']
