The aim of the study is presenting own experiences in using different diagnostic modalities in evaluating @entity6177 . Material comprises a group of nine @entity1 with diagnosed @entity6177 aged between 22 and 78 years. The plain abdominal radiograms, ultrasound examinations and computed tomography were performed in those @entity1 . The CT examination was performed in 10-mm thick axial sections, before and after administering contrast agent. The perirenal @entity733 were found in two @entity1 . In US have showed various, inhomogeneous echogenicity, depending on the stage of the abscess. The contrast CT reveals enhancing septa, thick walls and oval, central area of lower density. The plane radiograms revealed @entity733 in three cases. In two of them @entity733 were complications of previouscholecystectomy. The large @entity733 dislocated intestinal loops. CT was necessary to assess the extent, depth and shape of retroperitoneal fluid collections. Abdominal abscess is life threatening condition requiring quick diagnosis and proper management. The imaging methods are especially important in diagnosis of @entity733 . @entity733 may by recognized on plain abdominal radiograms, but US and especially CT are much more sensitive and accurate. CT is imaging modality of choice in revealing @entity6177 . CT and US are very useful in nonoperative therapies, including US and CT guided drainage.

Imaging of XXXX .

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients'] @entity6177 :: ('MESH:D018784', 'Disease') :: ['abdominal abscess', 'abdominal abscesses'] @entity733 :: ('MESH:D000038', 'Disease') :: ['abscesses', 'Abscesses']
@entity6177 :: (MESH:D018784,Disease) :: ['abdominal abscesses']
