PURPOSE: To investigate multimodality systemic and neuro-monitoring practices in @entity131 ( @entity131 ) and to analyze differences among "neurointensivists" (NI; clinical practice comprised >1/3 by neurocritical care), and @entity5 ( @entity5 ). METHODS: Anonymous 22-question Web-based survey among physician members of SCCM and ESICM. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-five responded (66% completion rate); 422 (65%) were @entity5 , and 226 (35%) were NI. More NI follow hemodynamic protocols for @entity131 (44.5% vs 33%, P=.007) and @entity510 (38% vs 21%, P<.001). For CPP optimization, NI use more arterial-waveform-analysis (AWA) (45% vs 35%, P=.019), and ultrasound (37.5% vs 28%, P=.023); NI use more PbtO2 (28% vs 10%, P<.001). In the case scenario of raised @entity428 /low PbtO2, most employ analgesia and/or sedation (47%) and osmotherapy (38%). More NI use pressure reactivity (vasopressor use @entity5 23% vs NI 34.5%, P=.014). For DCI, more NI target cardiac index (CI) (35% vs 21%, P<.001), and fluid responsiveness (62.5% vs 53%, P=.03). Also, NI use more angiography (57% vs 43.5%, P=.004), @entity12705 (56.5% vs 38%, P<.001), @entity93 (32% vs16%, P<.001), and PbtO2 (18% vs 7.5%, P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intensivists with exposure to @entity131 @entity1 employ more neuro- and hemodynamic monitoring. We found large heterogeneity and low overall use of advanced brain-physiology parameters.

Hemodynamic and neuro-monitoring for neurocritically ill XXXX : An international survey of intensivists.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients'] @entity131 :: ('MESH:D001930', 'Disease') :: ['ABI', 'TBI', 'acute brain injury'] @entity12705 :: ('MESH:D015794', 'Disease') :: ['TCD'] @entity5 :: ('MESH:D009369', 'Disease') :: ['other intensivists', 'OI'] @entity428 :: ('MESH:D019586', 'Disease') :: ['ICP'] @entity510 :: ('MESH:D013345', 'Disease') :: ['SAH'] @entity93 :: ('MESH:D003570', 'Chemical') :: ['CTP']
@entity1 :: (9606,Species) :: ['patients']
