OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a motion control running shoe reduces @entity717 in the transverse plane during treadmill running. DESIGN: An experimental study measuring @entity717 in volunteer @entity1 using a repeated measures design. SETTING: @entity1 Movement Laboratory, School of Health Professions, University of Brighton. @entity1 : Twenty-four healthy @entity1 were tested. The group comprised males and females with size 6, 7, 9 and 11 feet. The age range for @entity1 was 19 to 31 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The total range of proximal @entity717 was measured using the Codamotion 3-D Movement Analysis System. RESULTS: A one-tailed paired t-test indicated a statistically significant decrease in the total range of proximal @entity717 when a motion control shoe was worn (mean difference 1.38  , 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 2.73, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: There is a difference in @entity717 in the transverse plane between a motion control running shoe and a neutral running shoe. The results from this study have implications for the use of supportive running shoes as a form of injury prevention.

Effect of motion control running shoes compared with neutral shoes on XXXX during running.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['participants', 'Human', 'PARTICIPANTS'] @entity717 :: ('MESH:D009069', 'Disease') :: ['tibial rotation']
@entity717 :: (MESH:D009069,Disease) :: ['tibial rotation']
