An evaluation of 220 cases of frontocranial remodeling for @entity91 is reported. The follow-up period was 10 years for @entity1 , 7 years for @entity1 . The principles of the craniofacial techniques described in 1974 [4] and 1978 [3] were not modified; only variations were added. The floating forehead [5] concept has also remained basically unchanged. Intracranial pressure recordings have been used continually to help evaluate borderline indications and to assess results [9]. Our results show that 14% of cases of @entity91 affecting only one suture, usually considered as merely aesthetic problems, in fact were accompanied by @entity428 . The postoperative recordings have shown a return to normal pressures. Growth has not deteriorated the initially satisfactory results at the level of the forehead. At the midface level, improvement has been observed after surgery, especially for plagiocephalics. Their orbitonasal asymmetry has nearly completely disappeared. @entity1 with bilateral faciocraniosynostosis show an improvement of midface development compared with non-operated @entity1 , but in severe cases an inverted bite still develops and further @entity2652 remain necessary. The Apert's @entity1 remain the most difficult to improve.

Craniofacial surgery for XXXX improves facial growth: a personal case review.

@entity91 :: ('MESH:D003398', 'Disease') :: ['craniosynostosis'] @entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['children', 'Patients', 'patients', 'infants'] @entity2652 :: ('MESH:D005148', 'Disease') :: ['facial osteotomies'] @entity428 :: ('MESH:D019586', 'Disease') :: ['increased intracranial pressure']
@entity91 :: (MESH:D003398,Disease) :: ['craniosynostosis']
