BACKGROUND: The German guideline on long-term @entity26 therapy (LTOT) was published in 2008 by the German Respiratory Society (DGP), while the British @entity1514 Society (BTS) published their most recent guideline in 2015. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present article was to highlight the major areas of consensus and disagreement in the recently published BTS and DGP guidelines on LTOT. METHODS: The BTS and DGP guidelines were directly compared in terms of congruencies and differences. A critical appraisal was then performed and authors' suggestions were provided. RESULTS: The 2 guidelines are almost congruent in 2 major areas, namely, (1) the indication criteria for LTOT in @entity1030 ( @entity1030 ) @entity1 at rest and (2) the recommended duration of LTOT over a 24-h period. However, 8 major areas in which the guidelines differ considerably were identified: (1) techniques for blood gas analysis; (2) timing of LTOT in stable @entity1 ; (3) LTOT in post-exacerbation @entity1030 @entity1 ; (4) ambulatory @entity26 therapy; (5) nocturnal @entity26 therapy; (6) titration of @entity26 flow rates; (7) follow-up visits; and (8) LTOT for @entity1 who still smoke. Furthermore, the BTS guideline is much more detailed, includes more references (161 vs. 71) and is more up to date than the DGP guideline. CONCLUSION: There are major differences between the 2 guidelines. Many of the aspects raised by the BTS guideline appear to be reasonable with regard to the current literature, clinical experience and prescription practices. However, an international consensus on LTOT is lacking.

Long-Term XXXX Therapy: Comparison of the German and British Guidelines.

@entity1 :: ('9606', 'Species') :: ['patients'] @entity26 :: ('MESH:D010100', 'Chemical') :: ['oxygen'] @entity1514 :: ('MESH:D013896', 'Disease') :: ['Thoracic'] @entity1030 :: ('MESH:D029424', 'Disease') :: ['chronic obstructive pulmonary disease', 'COPD']
@entity26 :: (MESH:D010100,Chemical) :: ['Oxygen']
