Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Once Daily Amlodipine/Valsartan 5/80 as Compared to Amlodipine/Valsartan 5/40 or to Amlodipine 5 mg Monotherapy in Patients 65 Years of Age and Older With Essential Hypertension
Condition: Hypertension
MeSH terms: Hypertension; Essential Hypertension
Intervention: Amlodipine 5 mg; Valsartan 80 mg; Valsartan 40 mg; Placebo
Intervention description: 1 capsule amlodipine 5 mg orally once daily; 1 capsule valsartan 80 mg orally once daily; 1 capsule valsartan 40 mg orally once daily; 1 capsule placebo to match valsartan orally once daily
Intervention MeSH terms: Amlodipine; Valsartan
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional
Primary purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Enrollment: 965.0
Sex: All
Minimum age: 65 Years
Healthy volunteers: No
Keywords: Blood pressure; hypertension; elderly

Summary:

      To characterize the safety, tolerability, and efficacy profile of amlodipine/valsartan 5/80
      mg as compared to amlodipine/valsartan 5/40 mg (with optional titration to 5/80 mg) and
      amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy in elderly patients (≥ 65 years of age) with essential
      hypertension. All three regimens are expected to be well tolerated.
    

Eligibility criteria:

        Inclusion criteria

          -  Provide written informed consent before any assessment was performed.

          -  Male or female at least 65 years of age.

          -  Diagnosed as having hypertension:

               -  At Visit 1/Screening, treatment naïve patients had to have a mean seated SBP ≥
                  155 mmHg and < 180 mmHg; patients undergoing washout from their previous
                  antihypertension medication had to have a mean seated SBP <180 mmHg.

               -  At Visit 2/Single-blind run-in entry, all patients had to have a mean seated SBP
                  ≥ 155 mmHg and < 180 mmHg.

               -  At Visit 3/Core double-blind treatment period entry, all patients had to have a
                  mean seated SBP ≥ 145 mmHg and < 180 mmHg.

          -  Ability to communicate and comply with all study requirements including measuring
             their blood pressure at home, daily as instructed, using the home blood pressure
             monitor provided by the Sponsor.

          -  Female patients had to be post-menopausal for at least one year.

        Exclusion criteria

          -  Severe hypertension (mean seated SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or a mean seated DBP ≥ 110 mmHg).

          -  History of secondary hypertension (including primary aldosteronism, renovascular
             hypertension, pheochromocytoma, etc.).

          -  Use of three or more antihypertensive drugs. Dual fixed dose combination therapy was
             considered as two antihypertensive drugs.

          -  Administration of any agent indicated for the treatment of hypertension after Visit 1,
             with the permitted exception of those antihypertensive medications requiring tapering
             down (e.g. beta-blocker and/or clonidine) commencing with Visit 1.

          -  Known moderate or malignant retinopathy. Moderate was defined as retinal signs of
             hemorrhage, microaneurysm, cotton-wool spot, hard exudates, or a combination thereof;
             malignant defined as signs of moderate retinopathy plus swelling of the optic disk.

          -  Known or suspected contraindications, including history of allergy or hypersensitivity
             to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), or to drugs
             with similar chemical structures.

          -  History of cerebrovascular accident, thrombotic stroke, or transient ischemic attack.

          -  Significant history of coronary artery disease (CAD) such as any history of myocardial
             infarction (MI), angina pectoris, and all types of revascularization procedures.

          -  History of or diagnosis of congestive heart failure Grade II-IV according to the New
             York Heart Association (NYHA) classification.

          -  Clinically significant valvular heart disease.

          -  All patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus and those patients with Type 2 diabetes
             mellitus who, in the opinion of the investigator, were not well controlled. Patients
             who needed oral anti-diabetic medication to adequately control their Type 2 diabetes
             had to be on a stable dose of oral anti-diabetic medication for at least 4 weeks prior
             to Visit 1.

          -  Concomitant potentially life threatening arrhythmia or symptomatic arrhythmia.

          -  Second or third degree heart block with or without a pacemaker.

          -  Significant hepatic disease, as demonstrated by any one of the following: aspartate
             aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values greater than two times
             the upper limit of normal at Visit 1, a history of hepatic encephalopathy, a history
             of esophageal varices, or a history of a portocaval shunt.

          -  Evidence of renal impairment as determined by any one of the following: glomerular
             filtration rate (GFR) < 50 ml/min/1.73m2 as measured by the Modification of Diet in
             Renal Disease (MDRD) formula at Visit 1, a history of dialysis, or a history of
             nephrotic syndrome.

          -  History of clinically significant allergies including asthma and/or multiple drug
             allergies.

          -  Any surgical or medical condition with the potential to significantly alter the
             absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of any drug including but not
             limited to any of the following: history of major gastrointestinal tract surgery such
             as gastrectomy, gastroenterostomy, bowel resection, gastric bypass, gastric stapling,
             or gastric banding, currently active or inactive inflammatory bowel syndrome within 12
             months prior to Visit 1, currently active gastritis, ulcers, or
             gastrointestinal/rectal bleeding, or urinary tract obstruction regarded as clinically
             meaningful by the investigator.

          -  Any condition, not identified in the protocol, that, in the opinion of the
             investigator or the Novartis monitor, placed the patient at higher risk from his/her
             participation in the study, or was likely to prevent the patient from complying with
             the requirement of the study or completing the trial period.

          -  History of malignancy of any organ system, treated or untreated, within the past 5
             years whether or not there was evidence of local recurrence or metastases, with the
             exception of localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin.

          -  Any chronic inflammatory condition needing chronic anti-inflammatory therapy.

          -  History of drug or alcohol abuse within the last 2 years.

          -  Use of investigational drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 30 days prior to
             Visit 1 (Week 8).

          -  Inability to communicate and comply with all study requirements including the
             unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent.

          -  Persons directly involved in the execution of this protocol.

          -  History of non-compliance to medical regimens, or patients unwilling to comply with
             the study protocol.

          -  Any severe, life-threatening disease within the past five years.