Azithromycin in Post Diarrheal Haemolytic and Uremic Syndrome
Condition: Haemolytic and Uremic Syndrome
MeSH terms: Azotemia; Syndrome
Study type: Interventional

Summary: 
      Post diarrheal hemolytic and uremic syndrome (D+HUS) is the first etiology of acute renal
      failure in children less than 5 years old in France. Previous works highlighted a mortality
      rate of 2 % and a prevalence of renal sequelae at one year after D+HUS onset in 25 % of
      patients D+HUS is a consequence of a gastrointestinal infection with shiga toxin (Stx)
      producing E.coli (STEC). The most frequent straight is E.coli O157H7. The sequence of STEC
      induced HUS is now well known. Typically, digestive symptoms appear five days following STEC
      ingestion. STEC colonize the intestinal mucosa, adhere to the enterocyte and cause a typical
      attaching/effacing lesion and inflammation. Then, diarrhea and vomiting occurred. D+HUS
      occurs in about 10% of patients and is a consequence of Stx systemic absorption. Indeed, Stx
      are released in the gastrointestinal tract, then after transferred to the systemic
      circulation. At the cellular level, Stx binds the globotriosylceramide (Gb3Cer) localized at
      the surface of the endothelial and epithelial cells of target organs. Following binding to
      Gb3Cer, the A subunits of Stx are internalized and trigger the activation of the apoptotic
      program leading to cell death. In addition, Stx are also able to enhance the production and
      the release of pro inflammatory factor (IL-1, TNFα, IL-6). Cytokines locally produced by
      Stx-stimulated cells can amplify the inflammatory processes and the prothrombotic state
      leading to the constitution of the microangiopathic lesions of HUS. To this day, management
      of D+HUS involves supportive care mainly based on fluid management, dialysis and red blood
      cells transfusions. Specific therapies used in D+HUS (plasma infusion, antithrombotic and
      anti inflammatory agents) failed to improve the course of D+HUS. The use of antibiotics
      remains not recommended while meta-analysis clearly showed that the use of bactericidal
      antibiotics could worse the course of D+HUS. In vitro experimentations highlighted that some
      classes of antibiotics like fluoroquinolones dramatically increase the production and the
      release of Stx before bacterial lysis and worsen the outcome of D+HUS in animal models. By
      contrast, azythromycin, a bacteriostatic antibiotic of the macrolides family blocking the
      protein synthesis in bacteria, has a strong inhibitory effect on Stx production and release
      by STEC as well as it inhibits the in vitro growth of STEC strains. In addition, azithromycin
      is able to inhibit the Stx-induced production of inflammatory cytokines which are considered
      to be essential for the development of D+HUS. Consistently the use of azithromycin in animal
      models of D+HUS dramatically improved the survival rate. Preliminary data on humans with
      D+HUS treated with azithromycin highlighted a lower prevalence of severe gastrointestinal
      involvement than in control patients. All these data supported the hypothesis that
      azithromycin should have a beneficial effect on D+HUS and should improve the short and long
      term outcome and deserves to be formally demonstrated in human with D+HUS.
    

Detailed description: 
      Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is defined by the combination of microangiopathic hemolytic
      anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute renal failure. The underlying lesion is thrombotic
      microangiopathy (TMA) affecting arteriole and capillary walls, with endothelial cells
      swelling and detachment and thrombi obstructing vascular lumina. Post- diarrheal HUS (D+HUS)
      is induced by an infection due to E. coli (STEC) producing a Shiga -like toxin (Stx) which is
      responsible of TMA. Serotype O157:H7 represents 63-97 % of STEC causing D+HUS. Other
      serotypes frequently implicated in outbreaks are O26:H11, O103:H2, O111:H8, O145:H28 (Mariani
      - Kurkdjian P et al, 2001) (Espié et al, 2008).

      The D+HUS mainly affects children under 3 years and occurs after a prodromal bloody diarrhea.
      The onset of HUS surrounds 3 to 5 days after the onset of diarrhea. D+HUS is the leading
      cause of acute renal failure in children under 5 years (Decludt et al. 2000).

      In France, 100 to 120 pediatric cases of D+HUS are reported each year. STEC infection was
      demonstrated in 85 % of cases. In 50 % of cases, one or more persons of the same family have
      STEC diarrhea without HUS. The death rate in the acute phase is about 2% and 50% of D+HUS
      requires dialysis. The predictive factors of a poor outcome are an anuria for more than 8
      days a neutrophil count>20000/mm3, a severe bowel disease or central nervous system (CNS)
      involvement (Scheiring et al. 2008). In 65-80 % of cases, a seemingly ad integrum recovery of
      renal function was observed within the first year after D + HUS onset. However, D+HUS is
      responsible for a nephron loss that could lead to hypertension, proteinuria and chronic renal
      failure in the long term. A study performed on 218 patients undergoing D+HUS in the chidhood,
      highlighted the presence of renal sequelae in nearly 65 % of them with a median follow-up of
      nearly 20 years. (Fila et al, submitted).

      Classically, humans are infected by contaminated food (minced meat undercooked products,
      unpasteurized milk and cheese...), by the animal environment (especially cattle) or by
      transmission from person to person. EHEC virulence is associated with the presence of toxins
      called Shigatoxins (Stx) and the presence of the eae gene, responsible for damage attachment
      - clearing in the colon and caecum. Two major types of Shigatoxin, Stx1 and Stx2, and many
      Stx1 or Stx2 variants were identified: three variants for Stx1 and at least, six variants for
      Stx2. The determination of different profiles variants Stx is considered as predictive of the
      severity of STEC infections with progression to HUS, especially Stx2d activated and Stx2c
      After ingestion of contaminated food, STEC are able to withstand the acidity of the stomach
      and colonize the digestive tract. Toxins produced by the bacteria go through the intestinal
      epithelium, join the circulatory system and reach their target organs, mainly kidneys and
      CNS. Indeed, toxins bind to a specific glycolipid receptor, globotriosylceramide (Gb3) on the
      surface of endothelial cells of target organs (digestive tract, kidney, CNS, pancreas)
      driving on the one hand, the release of pro-inflammatory factors (TNF- α, IL6, IL8) involved
      in the formation of lesions of microangiopathy and leading to apoptosis of the target cells
      (Hurley et al. 2001) (Thorpe et al, 1999) (Zoja et al.2010).

      To this day, management of D+HUS requires only supportive care. All specific therapies
      (antithrombotic and anti inflammatory agents, specific antibodies against Shigatoxin, plasma
      transfusion and plasma exchange) did not show efficacy (Scheiring et al. 2008) (Loirat et al.
      2012).

      Several retrospective and prospective studies suggest that antibiotics increase the risk of
      HUS by release of Stx during bacterial lysis but also to certain types of antibiotics,
      increased synthesis of Shiga toxin. The meta-analysis performed by Wang et al on the use of
      antibiotics in patient with STEC diarrhea and D+HUS highlighted an increased risk of
      developing D+HUS in patients treated with antibiotics (Wang et al. 2000). A second
      meta-analysis bringing together 20 studies, that compared the risk of HUS occurrence in
      patients with STEC diarrhea treated or not with antibiotics, has not concluded (Panos et al.
      2006). According to these results, antibiotherapy is actually not recommended for patients
      with diarrhea EHEC and patients with D+HUS (Scheiring et al. 2008). However, these studies
      did not distinguish between different classes of antibiotics, bringing together all the
      bacteriostatic antibiotics as well as bactericidal. But, in vitro studies have clearly shown
      that certain classes of antibiotics such as quinolones induced the production of Shigatoxin
      (multiplying production by a factor of 100 for ciprofloxacin) while others had a strong
      inhibitory action as the azithromycin (Ohara et al. 2002 ) .

      Azithromycin, an antibiotic of the macrolide family, binds to the 50S subunit of the
      bacterial ribosome and inhibits protein synthesis by blocking transpeptidation. This
      mechanism inhibits the production and the release of Shiga toxin in STEC (Ohara et al. 2002).
      Studies on animal models of D+HUS (mice, piglet) showed a drastic reduction in mortality.
      Moreover, in addition to its inhibitory action on the synthesis of Stx, azithromycin has a
      modulating effect on the inflammatory reaction on the vascular endothelium induced by the
      Shigatoxin that contribute to thrombotic microangiopathy. Indeed, azithromycin dramatically
      decreased secretion of IL6, IL1 and TNFα (Gantzhorn et al. 2009) (Ohara et al. 2002) (Zhang Q
      et al. 2009).

      Moreover, a recent work from Amran et al performed in a mouse model of D+HUS highlighted a
      protective effect of azithromycin on the occurrence of neurological inhibition of
      inflammatory mechanism induced by Shigatoxin in the vascular endothelium brain and neurons
      (Amran et al. 2013).

      On the human being, the German outbreak of D+HUS in O104H4 helped highlight the importance of
      an early treatment with azithromycin on the eradication of carriage of the bacteria as well
      as the eradication of Stx in stool (Nitschke et al. 2012). In addition, preliminary data from
      a retrospective study of D+HUS in Robert Debré hospital showed a lower incidence of severe
      digestive tract impairment in patients with D+HUS who received treatment with azithromycin
      compared to the control group (unpublished data).

      The objective of a prospective study on patients with D+HUS treated with azithromycin will be
      to prove its beneficial effects on renal, hematological, digestive tract and neurological
      impairment seen in D+HUS and to reduce the potential sequelae.
    

Intervention name(s): Azithromycin; Placebo (glucose solution 10%)
Intervention type(s): Drug; Drug
Intervention description(s): ZITHROMAX ® 40mg/ml solution. DCI : Azithromycin . Pfizer ® 20mg/kg dose with a maximum dose of 500mg per day for three days
Intervention MeSH terms: Azithromycin
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary purpose: Treatment