Analysis of Language and Auditory Abilities in Cochlear Implanted Children
Condition: Children With Cochlear Implant
Study type: Interventional

Summary: 
      The cochlear implant appears today as one of the best technique so as to lead the congenital
      deaf children to speak. However the results in terms of accurate access to language remain
      partial. These results are usually due to the children own factors (social, educational and
      handicap ones), one which any action has a limited effect.

      Besides, there are external factors on which one can rely : " treatments ". For instance, an
      early cochlear implant on a child is the main stream to a better access to speak properly
      later. Another essential point to tackle is the early re-education training which remains
      essential to the treatment. Yet, there is a gap to fill between the theory and the main
      assistance in the auditory education practice.

      The main objective of this survey is to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching
      programme (MPAA) over the 4 tested skills (identification, discrimination, the analysis of
      sounds scenes and its memory) among the pre-speaking cochlear implanted congenital deaf
      children aged from 4 to 10.

      This study will be divided into two phases separated by 3 sessions of evaluation tests.

      The first session T1 will occur in the two groups (experimentation on G1 and control on G2),
      then the first training session will start in group G1.

      The second session T2 will occur in the two groups, then the first training session will
      start in group G2.

      The third session T3 will occur in the 2 groups at the end of the experiment.

      By training the 4 perceptible operations with different auditory stimulations (speech, music,
      sounds and electro-acoustic sounds), we are looking for better performance in the trained
      skills as well as a teaching transfer on other linguistic abilities (phonetics discrimination
      and speech).
    

Detailed description: 
      The cochlear implant appears today as one of the best technique so as to lead the congenital
      deaf children to speak. However the results in terms of accurate access to language remain
      partial. These results are usually due to the children own factors (social, educational and
      handicap ones), one which any action has a limited effect.

      Besides, there are external factors on which one can rely : " treatments ". For instance, an
      early cochlear implant on a child is the main stream to a better access to speak properly
      later. Another essential point to tackle is the early re-education training which remains
      essential to the treatment. Yet, there is a gap to fill between the theory and the main
      assistance in the auditory education practice.

      Researches on auditory cognitive sciences make the distinctions between different operation
      treatments ranged from the identification of sounds sources to the discrimination of specific
      acoustic parameters to the analysis of auditory scenes and the memorization of its sources.
      (Mc Adams and Bigand, 1994).Each operation implies a specific treatment.

      Yet, these operations are not systematically followed by a re-education treatment among deaf
      children even if one is to know that it has a positive impact on the linguistic skills.

      They can be trained by a large range of non linguistic stimuli as these specific stimuli
      belong to the fundamental auditory cognition, their development lead to benefits on the
      treatment of all the auditory stimuli. Music is part and parcel of the chosen stimuli, as
      many critics have proved that music was a source of transfer effect for visual and spatial
      skills for instance (Giomi-Costa, 2003) A synthesis of these researches has been at the
      source of the so called " method of programmed auditory skills " whose purpose was to develop
      the complete auditory skills abilities. This complete teaching programme has been integrated
      in a playful context for children that allows to control the action, the gesture and the game
      as well as the sounds atmosphere. This teaching programme is controlled by a computer with a
      large number of different sounds and which is linked to the playful sphere.

      The main objective of this survey is to evaluate the efficiency of this auditory teaching
      programme (MPAA) over the 4 tested skills (identification, discrimination, the analysis of
      sounds scenes and its memory) among the pre-speaking cochlear implanted congenital deaf
      children aged from 4 to 10.

      This study will take place in the CHU de La Timone in Marseilles in the ENT children
      department and is at the heart of a cooperation with Dr Emmanuel Bigand team in Dijon (LEAD
      CNRS, UMR 5022 à Dijon). The cochlear implant children department in Marseilles gathers a
      group of more than 70 implanted children aged from 4 to 10 that is in adequacy with the
      parameters for the method to evaluate.

      Two groups of 21 cochlear implant children will be included in this study.

      This study will be divided into two phases separated by 3 sessions of evaluation tests.

      The first session T1 will occur in the two groups (experimentation on G1 and control on G2),
      then the first training session will start in group G1.

      The second session T2 will occur in the two groups, then the first training session will
      start in group G2.

      The third session T3 will occur in the 2 groups at the end of the experiment.

      By training the 4 perceptible operations with different auditory stimulations (speech, music,
      sounds and electro-acoustic sounds), we are looking for better performance in the trained
      skills as well as a teaching transfer on other linguistic abilities (phonetics discrimination
      and speech).
    

Intervention name(s): 3 sessions of evaluation tests; 1 training session
Intervention type(s): Other; Other
Intervention description(s): 3 sessions of evaluation tests, each session during 15 days; 20 sessions of 30 minutes by week during 24 semaines
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)