Perception Processing in Schizophrenia Patients and Normal Population
Condition: Schizophrenia; Normal Population
MeSH terms: Schizophrenia
Study type: Observational

Summary: 
      The present study aimed to examine face and object perception processes in schizophrenic
      patients. Schizophrenia is associated with deficits in visual processing that represent a key
      feature in the disorder. Previous studies have shown that schizophrenics exhibit deficits in
      a variety of facial-processing tasks (e.g., face recognition, recognition of facial
      expressions), that may severely hinder the patients' interpersonal and social skills. Some
      investigators have attributed these deficits to impairments in configural processing in
      schizophrenia. That is, an impairment in the ability to process the spatial relations between
      the constituent parts of a configuration (e.g., the spacing between the eyes of a given
      face). To date, studies aimed to investigate this possibility (e.g., Schwartz et al., 2002;
      Yong-Wook et al., 2008) yielded conflicting results. Additionally, it is not yet clear
      whether the hypothesized impairment in configural processing is restricted to faces, or
      whether it is more general in nature and applies to objects as well.
    

Detailed description: 
      In the present study we investigate the relative contribution of component versus configural
      properties to face and object perception in schizophrenic and control subjects. To this end,
      we designed a series of experiments that are based on former work by Kimchi and Palmer
      (1982), and on my Ph.D. dissertation conducted under the supervision of Prof. Ruth Kimchi at
      the IIPDM.

      Experiment 1 investigates the relative roles of local parts versus global configuration in
      object perception by applying a technique formalized by Kimchi and Palmer (1982).
      Participants are presented with hierarchical figures, in which larger figures (e.g., a
      "global" triangle) are constructed by smaller figures (e.g., "local" squares).

      Participants (schizophrenics and controls) perform a similarity-judgment task. In each
      experimental trial, participants are presented with a triad of stimuli: a standard figure and
      two comparison figures. Participants are asked to determine which of the two comparison
      figures is more similar to the standard. Each figure consists of a global square or triangle
      made of local squares or triangles. In the "same configuration" comparison figure different
      elements are arranged in the same configuration as the standard figure. In the "same element"
      comparison figure, the same elements as in the standard figure are used, but are arranged in
      a different configuration. The number of elements used to construct the standard figure is
      varied. Previous data with normal perceivers (Kimchi & Palmer, 1982) showed that as the
      number of elements increased (and their sizes decreased) perceivers tended to base their
      similarity judgments on the global configuration, rather than on its local elements. If
      schizophrenics are impaired in their ability to process configural information then their
      similarity judgments should mainly rely on the local elements rather than on the global
      configuration.

      Experiment 2 examines the relative contribution of facial components (e.g., eyes, nose,
      mouth) versus configural properties (e.g., spacing between the eyes) to face perception, by
      applying Garner's speeded classification paradigm (Garner, 1974). We have previously applied
      this paradigm in my Ph.D. dissertation to study face perception in normal perceivers.

      The stimulus set consists of four faces created by orthogonally combining components (eyes,
      nose, and mouth) and configural information (inter-eyes distance and nose-mouth distance). On
      each trial participants are asked to classify a face on either its components or its
      configural information, in two conditions. In the control condition only one facial dimension
      varies (e.g., components) while the other dimension (e.g., configural information) is held
      constant. In the filtering condition the two dimensions are varied orthogonally. Equal
      performance in the control and filtering conditions indicates that participants are able to
      selectively attend to the relevant dimension - the dimensions are processed independently.
      Poorer performance in the filtering condition than in the control condition - Garner
      interference - indicates that it is not possible to selectively attend to one dimension while
      ignoring another, irrelevant dimension - the dimensions are processed interactively.

      Results with normal perceivers revealed a symmetric Garner interference with upright faces:
      participants were unable to selectively attend to components and ignore irrelevant variation
      in configural information, and vice versa. These results imply perceptual interdependence in
      processing components and configural information. If schizophrenics are impaired in their
      ability to process configural information then patients should be able to selectively attend
      to components and ignore irrelevant variation in configural information, but not vice versa.
      This pattern would indicate the relative dominance of components over configural properties
      in upright face processing of schizophrenia patients.
    

Observational model: Ecologic or Community
Time perspective: Prospective
Sampling method: Probability Sample
Study population: 
        patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder according to DSM4 and
        normal population with no psychiatric history