Phase I/II for Safety and Efficacy of Nilotinib in a Population Steroid-refractory/or Steroid-dependent cGVHD
Condition: Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
MeSH terms: Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome; Graft vs Host Disease
Study type: Interventional
Phase: Phase 1

Summary: 
      Chronic Graft versus Host Disease (cGvHD) has been identified as the leading cause of late
      non-relapse mortality in Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) survivors. Up to now a
      standard satisfactory treatment for these patients does not exist. cGVHD is an
      immune-mediated disease, resulting from a complex interaction between donor and recipient
      adaptive immunity, but its exact pathogenesis is still incompletely defined.

      The purpose of this study is to determine safety and efficacy of Nilotinib in a population
      with steroid-refractory/or steroid-dependent cGvHD with a phase I study.

      In phase II the MTD will be used to define the efficacy of Nilotinib in a cGvHD steroid-
      refractory or steroid dependent population, with the same characteristics of the previously
      Imatinib-treated population.
    

Detailed description: 
      Chronic Graft versus Host Disease (cGvHD) has been identified as the leading cause of late
      non-relapse mortality in Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) survivors. Up to now a
      standard satisfactory treatment for these patients does not exist. cGVHD is an
      immune-mediated disease, resulting from a complex interaction between donor and recipient
      adaptive immunity, but its exact pathogenesis is still incompletely defined.

      Many cGVHD patients show skin and visceral involvement with fibrotic scleroderma-like
      features; recent experimental data suggest that patients with cGVHD with fibrotic/sclerotic
      manifestations, have agonistic antibodies activating the platelet-derived growth factor
      receptor (PDGF-R), like patients with Systemic Scleroderma (SS), suggesting a similar
      pathogenesis for these two diseases; recently it has been demonstrated that the up-regulation
      of the PDGF-R intracellular pathway leads to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), with
      consequent increased collagen synthesis, which, in turn, contributes to the pathologic
      lesions observed in both cGVHD and SS.

      Many data strongly suggest that, among the profibrotic cytokines, besides PDGF, also
      transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) can play a relevant role in the pathogenesis of fibrotic
      damage. Blockade of PDGF or TGF-β signaling has been shown to reduce the development of
      fibrosis in various experimental models. Recent in vitro data showed that the Tyrosine Kinase
      Inhibitor (TKI), Imatinib strongly inhibits both PDGF and TGF-β intracellular signaling.
      Considering this selective, dual inhibition by Imatinib of the TGF-β/PDGF pathways, we
      conducted a pilot study evaluating safety and activity of Imatinib in a series of patients
      affected by refractory cGVHD, with fibrotic/sclerotic features.

      In 2008 we started a national pilot multicentric study (supported by AIFA) to confirm these
      preliminary data; until now, 24 patients have been enrolled, and an interim analysis
      confirmed that Imatinib at low dosage is safe and well tolerated in this setting; however the
      response rate observed in this second study is 50% at sixth month, apparently inferior to the
      first pilot experience. Two possible reasons could be responsible for this discrepancy:
      first, in the last study, the response criteria are more stringent, being related to a
      multi-organ evaluation (according to the NIH Consensus Conference on GVHD); secondly, the
      average age of the patients enrolled in the second trial is significantly superior to the
      other ones (in the first study we observed the best responses in young patients). It's
      important to point out that the higher tolerated dose of Imatinib in this setting of patients
      is significantly inferior (100-200 mg) to the dosage currently used in patients with Chronic
      Myeloid Leukemia.

      Like Imatinib, Nilotinib is a TKI with better tolerability profile suggesting a better
      compliance, especially in frail patients with poor haematological tolerance and poor Quality
      of Life (QoL), such as those affected by steroid-refractory cGvHD.

      Therefore in the population of allotransplanted patients, with steroid-refractory cGvHD, an
      innovative approach with a novel TKI is justified for the following reasons:

        1. Both first-generation TKI and second-generation TKI have been largely used for long
           periods in many patients with malignancies, showing a good safety profile;

        2. Imatinib achieved preliminary encouraging results in refractory cGvHD patients, who
           represent a frail and truly orphan population with a very poor quality of life;

        3. The availability of a new TKI with better tolerability profile can achieve not only a
           better response rate, (which may be considered perhaps a cosmetic result), but it could
           be also better tolerated for long time, allowing to improve the compliance and the
           duration of treatment in responding patients, with a consequent impact on the long term
           outcome of the transplantation procedure.

      Nilotinib is a novel aminopyrimidine, protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has been
      developed based on crystallographic studies of the interaction between IM (imatinib) and ABL
      (tyrosine kinase product of Abelson gene), so as to increase the affinity and the binding
      capacity of the derivative to wild type ABL and more important, to the ABL mutants which are
      the main cause of IM resistance.

      Nilotinib is active against the same TK as Imatinib, namely Abl, BCR-ABL (BCR-ABL oncoprotein
      product of BCR-ABL fusion gene), PDGFR-α and β, and c-Kit, but it is at least 10 times more
      potent against BCR-ABL.

      Moreover, Nilotinib is not active, like Imatinib, against several other TKs, including
      VEGFR-2, c-ERB-2, FLT3 (fetal liver tyrosine kinase 3), IGFR-1R (insulin-like growth factor
      receptor 1), Jak-2, RAS, lk and AKT. More interesting and more important (Table 2), Nilotinib
      is more active that Imatinib against a number of BCR-ABL mutants, with the exception of the
      T315I. It has to be noticed that in all the proliferation assays the concentration at which
      50% of effect is inhibited of Nilotinib is lower than 50 nM, apart from the two BCR-ABL
      mutants (E255K and E255V) where the IC50 is 600 to 700 nM.

      We have design a prospective, phase I/II, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter study to
      determine safety and efficacy of Nilotinib in a population with steroid-refractory/or
      steroid-dependent cGvHD. In phase I approximately 3-24 patients will be needed to find the
      MTD depending on the toxicities seen.

      In phase II the MTD will be used to define the efficacy of Nilotinib in a cGvHD steroid-
      refractory or steroid dependent population, with the same characteristics of the previously
      Imatinib-treated population.

      STATISTICAL DESIGN AND SAMPLE SIZE Phase I (Dose finding). Phase I will be conducted
      according to a standard 3+3 design. Initially, three patients will receive the lowest dose of
      Nilotinib, 200 mg QD. If no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as that dose which includes
      any Grade III/IV toxicity by the NCI-COMMON TOXICITY CRITERIA criteria is observed in the
      current cohort after at least one month of treatment, the next three patients will be treated
      with the next higher dose of Nilotinib (300 mg QD), then 200 mg BID, then 300 mg BID).

      If two or more DLTs are observed, the Phase I will end and MTD will be defined as the next
      lower dosage. If we will observe one DLT (1/3 patients), we will treat other three patients
      with the same dosage; if there isn't another DLT in these three patients, we will increase
      the dosage in the next cohort; but if we will observe another DLT in this cohort (total DLT
      2/6 patients), this means that we exceeded the MTD, and the study will continue in phase II
      using the previous dose. MTD will be considered the maximum dosage used to treat six patients
      achieving at most one DLT, or the minimum dosage if with this dosage we will achieve two DLT.
      In case of limiting Grade II toxicity a meeting of the data safety monitoring board (DSMB)
      might be held to decide how to continue the study. Pharmacokinetics: pharmacokinetics serum
      levels of Nilotinib will be determined in all patients within this phase by using
      mass-spectrometry assay, thanks to collaboration of Professor F. Pane, Naples.

      Doses will not be escalated beyond 600 or below 200 mg/die. Then the algorithm will proceed
      into Phase II. The dose estimated as the MTD in phase I will be used for phase II, this dose
      will be reviewed and may be adjusted accordingly by the DSMB after the analysis of toxicity
      obtained from all phase I patients at least 3 months under therapy.

      Phase II (Clinical efficacy part) To evaluate the efficacy of Nilotinib treatment the study
      will follow a Minimax design. This design consists in two subsequent enrolment phases. 19
      patients will be recruited in the first stage and, if after the enrolment not more than 6
      responses will happen, then the trial will end. In the second stage, other 20 patients will
      be recruited. The upper limit of the second stage rejection of the drug is 16.

      The whole number of recruited patients will be 39 with an early termination probability of
      67%. If after the first stage, the number of responses is fewer than or equal to a
      pre-determined value, r1 of n1, then PET is equal B(r1;n1,p) where B denotes the cumulative
      distribution function evaluated at r1 for a random variable that is binomially distributed
      with parameters n1 and p is the true probability of response. If the trial continues to the
      second stage, then the drug is rejected at the end of this stage if r or fewer responses are
      observed.

      Based on the best results observed in the literature with experimental treatments of steroid
      refractory cGvHD, we choose an overall minimal response (CR+PR) rate at least 50%, that is
      p1=0.50. The rate of ineffectiveness after the first stage is required not greater than 30%,
      (no attention is paid to its correlation to the disease or to the treatment), so p0=0.30. If
      the significance level is alpha=0.05, requiring a power of 1-beta=0.80, they have n1=19, r1=6
      according to the tables.

      The study will follow the Good Clinical Practice rules, and the ongoing trial will be
      monitored by the promoter GITMO "Trials Office".

      Primary objective in Phase I The primary objective of Phase I is to evaluate the safety of
      Nilotinib and defining the MTD of the drug.

      Primary objective in Phase II:

      In phase II the MTD will be used to define the efficacy of Nilotinib in a cGVHD steroid
      refractory population. In this phase, the primary end-point is the Overall Response Rate
      (ORR), defined as objective Improvement at sixth month, according to modified NIH Consensus
      Conference criteria.

      Secondary objectives:

      Reduction or stopping the concomitant immune-suppressive treatment (steroids, Extra-corporeal
      Photopheresis, Cyclosporin-A).

      Evaluation of Nilotinib tolerance along the 6 months of therapy: incidence of Serious Adverse
      Event (grade>2 according to WHO scale) in patients with refractory cGVHD -Evaluation of
      Nilotinib activity in patients with: skin fibrosis; lung fibrosis: Bronchiolitis Obliterans
      Organizing Pneumonia (BOOP) and/or pulmonary hypertension; visceral fibrosis. Appropriate
      assessment attachments will be used to measure the response in these districts, according to
      the cGVHD assessment worksheet of NIH Consensus Conference Documents and the modified Rodnan
      Score.

      TTF (Time to Treatment failure). OS at 1 year after start of Nilotinib therapy. Global Health
      state evaluated by Health Assessment Questionnaire The cGVHD symptom scale Biological
      objectives

      To evaluate the relationship between the serum levels of Nilotinib and response:

      Evaluation of the immunomodulatory effect of Nilotinib on T populations. To evaluate the
      relationship between response to Nilotinib and anti-PDGF-R antibody activity/titer Analysis
      of expression of selected auto-antibody complementarity-determining regions (CDR) in RNA of
      cGVHD patients.

      Evaluation of role of PDGF-R and TGFB-R pathway activation in cGVHD patient's with skin
      sclerosis.

      To evaluate the fibroblast activation pathway modifications before and after Nilotinib
      administration in vitro: decrease or de-phosphorylation of fibroblast activation markers
      (ROS, Ha-Ras, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, collagen type I, Smad, C-Abl) as
      index of PRGF-R/TGFB-R pathway inactivation (evaluated both in patient's fibroblast from skin
      biopsy and in immortalized fibroblast) after Nilotinib treatment.

      To set up a reliable and easy technique (alternative to the functional test used in the
      previous experimental works, based on the ROS output from murine fibroblasts, incubated with
      the patients purified immunoglobulins) for screening patients for the presence of stimulating
      anti-PDGFR antibodies before and after Nilotinib treatment.
    

Intervention name(s): nilotinib
Intervention type(s): Drug
Intervention description(s): Maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) will be defined in Phase I. First 3 patients (pts) will receive Nilotinib 200mg daily dose. If no dose limiting toxicities after at least 1month the next 3 pts will be treated with 300mg. If are>=2 dose limiting toxicities the Phase I will end and MTD will be defined as the next lower dosage. If they will observe 1dose limiting toxicities, they will treat other 3 pts (same dosage); if there isn't dose limiting toxicity, they will increase the dosage in the next cohort; but if they will observe another dose limiting toxicity (tot limiting toxicities 2/6 pts), the study will continue using the previous dose. MTD will be considered the maximum dosage used to treat 6 pts achieving at most 1 dose limiting toxicities, or the previous dosage if with this dosage they we will achieve 2 dose limiting toxicities. Doses will not be escalated beyond >600 or <200mg/die The MTD will be used for phase II
Other intervention name(s): tasigna; AMN107
Intervention model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary purpose: Treatment
Keywords: cGVHD; steroid therapy; Nilotinib; cGVHD steroid refractory; intolerant to steroid therapy; Tasigna; MTD