Low-level Laser Therapy in Enhancing Wound Healing and Preserving Tissue Thickness
Condition: Wounds
MeSH terms: Wounds and Injuries
Study type: Interventional

Summary: 
      Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of Low Level Laser Therapy
      (LLLT) on wound healing at Free Gingival Graft donor sites (FGGDS).

      Materials and Methods: Forty patients requiring FGG were selected for this randomized
      controlled double blinded prospective clinical trial. The FGGDS were treated with LLLT and
      compared with an untreated control group. The Wound Healing Index (WHI), tissue consistency,
      colour match (CM), and H2O2 bubbling test for the evaluation of complete wound
      epithelialization (CWE) were recorded at the 3rd, 7th, 14th and 21st days. The pain-burning
      level, number of analgesics, and bleeding were recorded for 7 days. Donor area soft tissue
      thickness (TT) was measured at baseline and at the 1st month.
    

Detailed description: 
      Subjects and Study Design This single center, randomized, double blinded, prospective and
      controlled clinical study was performed to evaluate the healing time, wound epithelialization
      and post-operative morbidity produced after harvesting FGG from the palate. The wounds were
      treated with one of the following methods: sterile wet gauze pressure (control) or LLLT
      (test).

      The patients were randomly assigned to one of the groups by the periodontists with the toss
      of a coin.

      Forty patients requiring FGG were selected, and verbal and written informed consent were
      obtained.

      To minimize the differences related to the surgical technique, all surgical procedures were
      carried out by one experienced clinician.

      Pre-Surgical Treatments All selected patients underwent a professional periodontal
      prophylaxis phase, and all patients were given proper oral hygiene instructions. Patients who
      had a full mouth plaque score (FMPS)˂20% and a full mouth bleeding score (FMBS)˂20% were
      included in the study. The patients were assigned to the control or test groups by the coin
      toss method.

      Surgical Procedure After local anaesthesia, the free gingival graft was harvested as follows:
      the donor site extended from the distal line angle of the canine to the mesial line angle of
      the maxillary first molar by conventional scalpel. An approximately 1.5 mm split-thickness
      and rectangular-shaped (7x12 mm) gingival graft was obtained. The free gingival graft was
      sutured to the prepared recipient bed using size 5-0 resorbable sutures.

      Test Group - LLLT The Ga-Al-As laser was used for LLLT at a wavelength of 940 nm. The wounds
      of each experimental group received laser stimulation at doses of 8.6 J/cm2, very closed the
      described dose (10 J/cm2) in the literature. The power output was maintained at a constant 3
      W in the continuous-wave (cw) mode; the pulse interval size was 0.10 ms, and the pulse length
      was 0.05 ms. Laser energy was applied via a 400-µm optical fibre with a Whitening and Pain
      Relief Handpiece® . The handpiece was positioned at a distance of approximately 1 mm proximal
      to the wound area perpendicularly at a non-contact mode. The spot area of handpiece involved
      all the wound area . The application area was actually similar with the probe spot area (2.8
      cm2). The wound area was 7x12=0.84 cm2. So the spot area of the probe was wider than the
      wound area and included all the wound area. For this reason, we did not need to move the
      handpiece, only kept constant. All surfaces of the wound were irradiated leading to total
      dosage of 8.6 J/cm2 and the irradiation time was 8 s. The energy at the wound area was 7.2 J
      (0.84 cm2 x 8.6 J/cm2 =7.2 J). The specified laser dose was initiated after surgery and was
      repeated on the 3rd, 5th, and 7th days after operation. The cumulative dose was 34.4 J/cm2 at
      total.

      Control Group - LLLT Sham Sterile wet gauze was pressed to the FGG donor site for 5 min in
      the control group. The LLLT was performed in a same manner with test group. However, no
      irradiation was occurred because of not pushing the start button.

      Post operative care A non-eugenol pack was placed over the sutured FGG (Coe-Pak™ Periodontal
      Dressing, GC America Inc., IL, USA). An acrylic stent was prepared to protect the palatal
      donor site and placed after surgery and recommended to patients to wear for 7 days. Patients
      were prescribed 500 mg of paracetamol (if needed) and a 0.12% chlorhexidine oral rinse twice
      a day for 2 weeks. The patients were advised to report any adverse outcomes and were recalled
      at 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st and 30th day (the 5th day for the LLT group). The sutures were
      removed after 2 weeks.

      Evaluated Parameters All evaluations were acquired by one periodontist who was blinded to the
      treatment assignment. The following parameters were recorded: H2O2 bubbling test for
      screening complete epithelialization, the Landry Wound Healing Index (WHI), pain and burning
      sensations by a VAS score, bleeding (yes/no), palatal tissue consistency, colour match,
      tissue thickness, and the number of analgesics.

      Intra-Surgical Measurements of Soft Tissue Thickness The thickness of the palatal soft tissue
      in the harvesting area was measured after local anaesthesia. The measurement was made
      approximately 5 mm apical to the gingival margin of the first premolar by means of a #20
      endodontic reamer with a silicon stopper. The thickness of the palatinae was measured in the
      test and control groups. The penetration depth was measured with a digital caliper. The
      dimensions of the graft were standardized by a sterile aluminium foil template that was 7x12
      mm in dimension.

      Subjective Assessments During the 7 days after the FGG procedure, the patients were asked to
      keep a diary of pain and burning sensations using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to evaluate
      the intensity of the given event. The VAS score for pain ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100
      (severe pain), represented by a continuous line of 10 cm length; while the burning sensation
      was scored as follows: 0 (absent) to 100 (severe burning). Additionally, the patients were
      asked to report their postoperative bleeding for 7 days as "Bleeding present (+)" or
      "Bleeding absent (-)".

      Palatal Tissue Consistency The consistency of the palatal mucosa was assessed on the 3rd,
      7th, 14th and 21st days by palpation with a blunt instrument and was scored as soft or firm
      by a clinician who was blind to the treatment assignment.

      Colour match On the 3rd, 7th, 14th and 21st days, the colour of the palatal mucosa was
      assessed by comparing it to that of the adjacent and opposite side using the objective VAS
      (VAS score 0-100) represented by a continuous line of 10 cm length, by a clinician blinded to
      the treatment group assignment. A score of 0 indicated no colour match, and a score of 100
      indicated a very good colour match with the adjacent tissues.

      Wound Epithelialization CWE (complete Wound Epithelialization) was evaluated clinically by
      the peroxide bubbling test . This was the primary outcome of this study. This test is based
      on the principle that if the epithelium is discontinuous, then H2O2 diffuses into the
      connective tissue, and the enzyme catalase acts on H2O2 to release water and oxygen, which is
      clinically observed as the production of bubbles on the wound. The area to be evaluated was
      dried, and 3% H2O2 was sprinkled on the wound with a syringe, followed by a period of waiting
      (approximately 10 seconds) for the appearance of bubbles, which suggest that the surgical
      site was not completely epithelialized.

      Landry Wound Healing Index (WHI) The palatal wounds were scored using the Landy Wound Healing
      Index on the 3rd, 7th, 14th and 21st days post operatively. This index evaluated the wounds
      based on the following criteria: tissue colour, response to palpation, incision margins and
      suppuration. The scores range from 1-5 and correspond to very bad to excellent healing.

      The number of analgesics Patients were asked to record the number of analgesics taken for
      pain relief during the first 7 post-operative days.

      Statistical Analysis The homogeneity of the data was tested by the Shapiro Wilk test.
      Non-parametric tests were used. SPSS v.17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois USA) was used for
      the analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze intergroup differences. Time
      dependent alterations were analyzed by the Wilcoxon test. The Binary Logistic Regression
      Analysis was performed to analyze the factors that affect epithelialization. Significance
      level was p<0.05.

      Power Calculation The primary outcomeof this study were the H2O2 test results. The power
      analysis was performed with ttp://www.openepi.com/Menu/OE_Menu.htm. The power of this study
      was calculated as 98.86%.
    

Intervention name(s): Low-Level Laser Therapy by Ezlase; Biolase®
Intervention type(s): Device
Intervention description(s): comparision of the effects of low-level-laser therapy on wound healing of palatal donor site
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary purpose: Treatment
Keywords: Low level laser therapy; wound healing; periodontology