Immunosuppression Impact on the Metabolic Control of Kidney Transplant With Pre-Existing Type 2 Diabetes (DM)
Condition: Kidney Transplant; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathy
MeSH terms: Kidney Diseases; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Study type: Interventional
Phase: Phase 4

Summary: 
      Protocol Title: Randomized open label study comparing the metabolic control of first Kidney
      Transplant recipients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) receiving either Prograf or Neoral
      as part of a ATG induction, prednisone free and blood monitored Cellcept immunosuppressive
      regimen.

      PURPOSE This is a single center medical research study to analyze post-transplant kidney
      recipients with pre-existing type 2 diabetes managed according to the recommended American
      Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines. Prograf (Tac) and Neoral (CSA) are the two main
      medications to prevent rejection after transplantation. However, they may contribute to
      poorer diabetes control. The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of Prograf and
      Neoral on the control of Diabetes after kidney transplantation. In addition, all participants
      in this study will receive Thymoglobulin (anti-lymphocyte globulin) at the time of
      transplantation instead of long term prednisone (steroids).
    

Detailed description: 
      It has been accepted that patients with DM are associated with a greater risk of morbidity
      and mortality and hyperlipidemia, compromised graft function, stroke, nephropathy,
      atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, graft-loss, infection, retinopathy, neuropathy,
      gastropathy, and vascular complications.2

      Patients with pre-existing DM had a 1.9 times less survival days.3 In renal transplantation,
      twice as many patients with pre-existing diabetes die with functioning graft.4

      DM has been shown to be predominantly the single most important predictor for adverse
      outcomes in terms of mortality and morbidity resulting from various end organ damages.

      Poor DM control leads to an increased risk of both graft loss and patient death due to
      manifestations of end-stage DM.8 Chronic Allograft Nephritis (CAN) is a common finding at the
      6th month post kidney transplant, especially in patients with blood glucose metabolism
      abnormalities.

      Several conditions may lead the worsening of the diabetes after transplantation. First, for
      patients with ESRD the improvement of kidney function after kidney transplantation leads also
      to an increased clearance of circulating insulin. Second, most patients experience a
      significant improvement of well being after successful transplantation. Often their appetite
      is significantly improved, resulting in a significant weight gain - increasing insulin demand
      and resistance. Finally, most immunosuppressive medications are diabetogenic.
      Corticoid-steroids are well known for their strong diabetogenic effect and have been
      associated with post transplant diabetes. Calcineurin inhibitors are now the corner stone of
      immunosuppression for organ transplantation. This class of medication includes cyclosporine
      and tacrolimus. Both have been associated with post transplantation diabetes. Induction
      agents, including polyclonal antibodies (ex. Thymoglobulin) and monoclonal antibodies (ex.
      Anti Il-2 receptor, Zenapax, Simulect) are not found to cause hyperglycaemia. The two areas
      of possible intervention to minimize worse diabetes after transplantation are thus limited to
      1) comprehensive diabetes education and 2) newer immunosuppressive regimen after
      transplantation.

      1.1 Comprehensive Diabetes Education:

      DM can arise both in the stressful time of organ failure or in the post-transplant phase.
      During a prospective study we conducted on solid organ transplant recipients with
      pre-existing and post transplant diabetes we observed the following trends:

        -  The complex nature of organ transplantation carries potential side effects, which are
           amenable to early intervention in the post transplant setting with patients who have
           diabetes through education and monitoring by the transplant team.

        -  Patients with poorly controlled diabetes post transplant have a higher incidence of post
           transplant morbidity.

      Our study showed a 7% DM-related re-admissions within one year post-transplant for patients
      in the Diabetes and Transplant Program, compared to a 93% DM-related re-admission rate within
      one year for patients not enrolled in the Program.10

      Further analysis of Stanford Medical Center's Transplant Diabetes Program revealed that
      patients' average HbA1c was 8.8% at intake into the program. Patients who were followed by
      this multi disciplinary Transplant Diabetes education team resulted in an average value of
      7.2% following a minimum of three months of management. 11

      1.2 Immunosuppression for Transplant Patients with Diabetes: The utilization of a calcineurin
      inhibitor in combination with steroids has contributed to the improved success of
      transplantation seen since the introduction of cyclosporine in 1983. Prograf, also a
      calcineurin inhibitor was introduce later (1989) and was associated with further improvement
      in results. Newer immunosuppressive medication has been introduced since then. There has been
      interest in the transplant community to use the new agents to achieve steroid minimization or
      avoidance. These strategies are very appealing for the diabetic patients as both steroids and
      calcineurin inhibitors are the most diabetogenic medication they receive after
      transplantation.

      1.2.1 STEROIDS Stanford's Pediatric kidney transplant team have demonstrated the feasibility
      of steroid avoidance or rapid taper after kidney transplantation. Doctor Salvatierra team
      substituted Zenapax induction therapy for steroids in a series of pediatric kidney transplant
      recipients. Patients received as well tacrolimus and MMF for prophylaxis of rejection. They
      initially reported their experience with the first 34 patients (5-21 years old) treated with
      that protocol. The graft survival was 100 % and the incidence of acute rejection was
      rejection 6% compared with 15 % for historical controls receiving steroids. They had no post
      transplantation diabetes or high blood pressure, cholesterol was lower, obesity and
      appearance was also significantly better.12 Steroid avoidance is now the standard treatment
      for Stanford's Pediatric Transplant Program.

      The adult Kidney Transplant Program has been able to reproduce the pediatric experience with
      a similarly designed steroid avoidance protocol. A slightly different approach has also been
      successfully used. Kidney transplant recipients received Thymoglobulin induction in lieu of
      Zenapax and received 4 small doses of steroids peri-operatively. So far 25 patients were
      treated with this minimal exposure to steroids. The graft and patient survival is 100% and
      only one episode of rejection was seen. This approach is preferred to the total avoidance of
      steroids since it is associated with a better initial kidney function.13 This later approach
      is currently used by Stanford's Adult Kidney Transplant Program for un-sensitized adult
      patients receiving a kidney transplant if they have a medical condition that could be
      exacerbated by the use of steroids; diabetes, obesity, osteopenia, and coronary artery
      disease.

      Utilisation of Thymoglobulin was associated with a lower incidence of acute rejection than
      IL-2RA. Xiao et Al showed the absence of Post Transplant Diabetes Mellitus (PTDM) and
      decreased use of anti-hypertensive medication in the steroid free group.

      Minimization of steroid use has clear metabolic benefits for the diabetic patients. Within
      Stanford University Transplant service there is enough experience to support its safe use. In
      this study, all patients will have minimal exposure to steroids. We have opted to give only
      peri-operative steroids (4 doses total) as in our experience this approach is associated with
      better initial graft function than the complete steroid avoidance. We also elected to use
      induction therapy with Thymoglobulin as it is associated with the lowest rate of rejection
      rate in the above mentioned studies.14

      1.2.2 Calcineurin inhibitors Calcineurin inhibitors have also been associated with post
      transplant diabetes. The incidence of PTDM has been reported to be more than 30% depending on
      the calcineurin inhibitor used, (Cyclosporine vs. Prograf), trough level, race, and risk
      factors for diabetes all contribute to this number. These figures may underestimate the true
      incidence of PTDM, as most studies have not utilized the strict criteria of the ADA for
      diagnosis of diabetes. Most studies report a higher incidence of PTDM with the use of Prograf
      compared to Cyclosporine. The greater diabetogenicity of Prograf has been confirmed in a
      recent study investigating the new onset of diabetes both before and after kidney
      transplant.14 this study revealed that the incidence of new-onset diabetes was 70% higher in
      Prograf treated patients than with patients receiving Neoral.16 This contrasts with studies
      mentioned above where Prograf is used in steroid free protocols with no or very low incidence
      of post transplant diabetes.

      Calcineurin inhibitors do remain the corner stone of immunosuppression at the present time,
      and even more so in the context of steroid minimization. It would thus be very important to
      determine if one of the two calcineurin inhibitors available on the market has a more
      favourable metabolic profile specifically for patients with pre-existing diabetes. Direct
      comparison between Neoral (micro-emulsion formulation of CSA) and Prograf has never been made
      in context of short steroid taper and specifically for non-insulin dependent diabetic
      patients.

      Equitable comparison between Neoral and Prograf is difficult, as both drugs do not have the
      same pharmacokinetic profile. Trough (or pre-dose) level has been used to evaluate drug
      exposure and make dosage adjustment. Prograf has a more predictive correlation between the
      trough level and the total area under the curve (total drug exposure of the patient) than
      Neoral. C2 monitoring of CSA consists of measuring the drug level 2 hours after ingestion.
      The correlation of C2 monitoring of Neoral to the area under the curve is similar to the
      correlation of the trough for Prograf to the area under the curve (both R 2=0.92). C2
      monitoring for Neoral has been associated with an increase in efficacy and reduction in
      toxicity. In this study we will use C2 monitoring for Neoral and trough monitoring for
      Prograf. Moderate minimization of the calcineurin inhibitor dosage will be used in this study
      in order to reduce the deleterious effect of the calcineurin inhibitors to the metabolism of
      glucose. A reduction of approximately 20% of our usual target level will be used.

      1.2.3 Cellcept (MMF) Utilization of MMF is combination of Prograf or Neoral is the standard
      treatment after kidney transplantation. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the active component of
      MMF. Therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA has been shown to reduce rejection and toxicity.15
      Furthermore; cyclosporine interferes with MPA metabolism resulting in a lower exposure to the
      drug compared to patients receiving Prograf when a fix dose is used. MPA monitoring may thus
      ensure that patients in our study are within therapeutic window of this immunosuppressive
      agent. This may prove to be even more crucial as they are not receiving steroids. MPA
      monitoring will also ensure that Neoral and Prograf groups receive the similar drug exposure
      to MPA.

      1.2.4 Conclusion

      Patients with diabetes are at higher risks of morbidity and mortality after kidney
      transplantation. Currently, there is no published data on the morbidity and mortality of
      these high risk patients from a prospective study that utilizes the American Diabetes
      Association (ADA) criteria for diabetes management and control, nor which addresses:

        -  The impact of steroids elimination on outcomes after kidney transplantation and
           metabolic control in patients with pre-existing type 2 diabetes.

        -  Optimization of CI therapy for post transplant patients with pre-existing type 2 DM and
           its impact on metabolic control.

      The proposed study compares the effect of Calcineurin inhibitors have on metabolic control in
      the absence of corticosteroids to better optimize post-transplant patient outcomes and
      decrease morbidity in patients with DM. With close monitoring of transplant recipient
      immunosuppression protocol, elimination of CS and the reduction of CI therapy, we propose
      there will be a decrease in patient morbidity associated with DM.

      The findings of this study may help:

        -  Identify optimal immunosuppression therapy for transplant patients with diabetes

        -  Decrease DM related co-morbidities and hospital readmissions

        -  Increase longevity of life and graft survival in transplant recipients with DM.

        -  Lower overall post-transplant health care costs that are attributed to the morbidity of
           immunosuppression therapy and diabetes.

        -  Promote better DM self-care in the transplant process

        -  Results from this study where 100% of the studied population is diabetic may provide
           further insight in the metabolism of glucose after transplantation resulting in better
           understanding of post transplant diabetes.

      During the conduct of the study the outcomes were amended to included freedom from insulin
      therapy, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as an indicator of graft function,
      post-operative survival up to 1 year, and biopsy-proven transplant rejection.
    

Intervention name(s): Cyclosporin; Tacrolimus; 'Diabetes Education / Management'
Intervention type(s): Drug; Drug; Behavioral
Intervention description(s): Dose adjustment to pre-established targets; Dose adjustment to pre-established targets; therapeutic adjustment to target ADA criteria
Other intervention name(s): Neoral; Prograf
Intervention MeSH terms: Cyclosporine; Tacrolimus; Cyclosporins
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary purpose: Treatment
Keywords: kidney Transplant; Type II Diabetes; Diabetic Nephropathy; Immunosuppression; Cyclosporin; Tacrolimus