Denis Beau: For a contribution from our FinTech ecosystem to a
more efficient and stable financial system
Speech by Mr Denis Beau, First Deputy Governor of the Bank of France, at the FINTECH
R:EVOLUTION 2020, Paris, 15 October 2020.
* * *
I would particularly like to thank Olivier Fliche for his contribution in preparing this speech.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am delighted to take part in this 5th edition of Fintech R:evolution and I would like to warmly
thank the France Fintech association and its chairman Alain Clot for their invitation to speak
today.
This event, organised against the backdrop of the ongoing health crisis, is proof of the drive,
determination and adaptability not only of the organising association, France FinTech, but
also of the entire innovative French ecosystem of the financial sector, which is now represented
here as widely as possible.
The French FinTech ecosystem, like any ecosystem made up of start-ups, is fragile but it is
promising and, I believe, vital to the financial sector.
The economic crisis associated with the health crisis highlights these contrasting
characteristics: on the one hand, start-ups may be weakened or innovative projects delayed by
the economic situation; and on the other hand, the health crisis has accelerated the adoption of
new digital habits by the entire population.
More generally, 2020 has only served to underscore the challenges facing the financial
ecosystem as a whole as a result of the digitisation of our economy. In order to meet these
challenges, it is imperative that this ecosystem transforms to accommodate changes in
demand for financial products and services, the increased competition that is driving down
profitability and the fast-growing need for operational resilience.
In this context, a thriving, creative and efficient FinTech ecosystem may be a key element in
the transformation of the financial system towards greater efficiency and resilience to
shocks.
as central banker and supervisor in charge of ensuring monetary and financial
This is why,
stability, I feel it is important to support this FinTech ecosystem and facilitate its smooth
Naturally, I would like to make it clear that
integration into the broader financial ecosystem.
this integration does not,in my opinion, mean a convergence of players, a "harmonious"
cooperation or a coordinated approach: the various players have different, sometimes even
opposing goals, and that is how competition works. However, we should not systematically pit
FinTechs against established players: there is a great variety of relationships between these two
worlds, as we see every day. The potential for enriching the financial ecosystem and making it
more efficient and resilient lies in strengthening the relationships between players and their
diversity. What do we want to do and what are we doing at the Banque de France and the
ACPR to support this development of the FinTech ecosystem? The short answer to this
question, which I will now illustrate, is, on the one hand, to be a
useful player in the FinTech
ecosystem and, on the other hand, to promote and implement a regulatory framework and
that foster both innovation and the stability of our financial
appropriate supervisory practices
system.
*
In order to be a useful player in the Fintech ecosystem, we have two objectives:
facilitate and
experiment
Facilitate, firstly.
This is what we are doing via the implementation of specific support tools. For instance, under
the aegis of a national start-up correspondent, who is also the French Tech correspondent,
the Banque de France has just deployed a network of regional start-up correspondents in each of
the 13 French Tech capitals. Their mission is to be the key point of reference for rating start-ups
and providing them with support and guidance thanks to their knowledge of funding mechanisms
and of the main players in the ecosystem.
As regards the ACPR, I no longer need to present the FinTech Innovation Unit, which has
already held hundreds of meetings with start-ups since its creation. Its purpose is to provide an
easily accessible entry point for those with innovative projects, giving them some initial regulatory
guidance to help them shape their projects and then refer them to the right correspondents for
the necessary registrations or authorisations.
Naturally, our facilitation efforts are not limited to bilateral contacts alone. Facilitating also
means
helping players in the ecosystem to engage with each other and find solutions
without necessarily resorting to regulatory measures. It is in this spirit that we run
the and that we have created working groups or task forces in
ACPR-AMF FinTech Forum
order to make concrete progress on important issues for the ecosystem, such as the access of
digital asset service providers to the bank accounts and banking services they need. Admittedly,
dialogue does not solve everything, but we very often find that many difficulties can be ironed out
through improved dialogue and a better understanding of the practices and technologies used by
the various stakeholders.
Second objective: experiment. Here I would like to give two different illustrations of this
approach.
The exploratory workshops conducted by ACPR on the use of artificial intelligence in the
financial sector are an example of what experimentation can bring not only to a supervisory
authority but also to the entire ecosystem. Indeed, these concrete experiments have enabled the
ACPR, based on specific use cases, to examine the code of the algorithms, their intrinsic
performance, their integration into operational processes, and their control and governance
environment. Drawing on this experiment, in order to share widely the lessons it has learned, the
ACPR published a study last June outlining what the framework for the proper use of these
future tools could look like. In this way, experimentation allows us to send the right signals for the
ecosystem to realise the potential of new technologies without fearing a delayed and unexpected
"backlash" from the Supervisory Authority.
The at the Banque de France on a
experiments underway central bank digital currency
(CBDC) are an illustration of the same experimental approach in the field of work specific to
central banks. They present with issues directly related to the need for the Eurosystem, should
circumstances require it, to be ready to issue a CBDC in order to ensure that central bank
money is accessible to the general public and to preserve their freedom of choice of means of
payment and their confidence in our currency. By testing the possible uses of a CBDC, we
investigate not only the potential of blockchain technologies but we also question the players in
the ecosystem on what tomorrow's landscape could look like, on subjects as fundamental as the
methods of exchanging financial instruments for CBDCs, the improvement of the conditions for
executing cross-border payments or new ways of making CBDCs available to financial sector
players.
* *
The second thrust of our work is to promote a regulatory framework and appropriate
supervisory practices.
In this respect, our immersion, as a player, in the innovative FinTech ecosystem is a
valuable asset that we intend to build on in order
to contribute to the impending and
necessary changes in regulations and supervision.
To briefly illustrate the current state of play of our supervisory practices, I would like to mention
the "suptech" approach underway at the ACPR: the supervisory authority's aim is to take
advantage of innovation to better carry out its missions at the best cost for the community and
thus prepare the supervision methods for tomorrow's financial processes. To date, four tools
developed in intrapreneurship with the support of the Banque de France's Lab, our space
dedicated to innovation, have been created and should concretely increase the efficiency of our
supervisors.
But I would like to focus for a moment on the contribution that we can make, as a central bank
and supervisory authority, to the development of the regulatory framework. In this area, I think it is
important to recall a few principles that underpin our vision as a supervisor and central banker
with regard to the changes in the regulatory framework of the financial system.
First of all, I would like to stress that no regulatory framework is set in stone. We must keep an
open mind, and have the necessary understanding and lucidity to
adapt frameworks to
technological evolutions - or even revolutions -, as well as to
their and
challenges associated risks.
Secondly, this adaptation must, in my view, preserve and consolidate of
two fundamentals
financial sector regulation: the financial stability objective and the principle of monetary
sovereignty.
In this respect, I would like to commend the ambitiousness of the European Commission's
recent Digital Finance Package and its priorities, in particular those to fight against the
fragmentation of the digital single market for financial services and to address the new
challenges and risks associated with the digital transformation. With regard to these risks, I think
it would be appropriate for the Commission to address the complex but currently unavoidable
issue of the oversight framework to be applied to critical IT service providers,
including cloud service providers, and the equally important matter of the supervision
of issuers and distributors of stablecoins, whether they be single or multi-currency coins.
I will not go into detail on the Commission's proposed legislation, which still requires careful
examination on our part and which will, of course, have to be improved by the negotiations that
are about to get underway. I simply want to say here that the regulations' proposals aimed at
critical IT service providers and stablecoins include promising provisions: for the former, a
dedicated framework that does not exempt financial intermediaries from their responsibilities and
their obligation to use European service providers, and for the latter, a strict supervision that
involves and associates national and European authorities. I would also like to stress here that
the two points for attention I have just mentioned do not, in my view, overshadow any of the
following: the many other initiatives announced in the action plan, the work to facilitate remote
access and promote an interoperable digital identity, the provisions on cybersecurity, or the
forthcoming discussions on artificial intelligence or data sharing in financial services - open
finance after open banking.
The message that I think is important today is the following: the stakes of this action plan on the
financial sector are high and it will have a major impact on the innovative ecosystems of the
French and European financial sectors. That is why the Banque de France and the ACPR will
be particularly attentive, in the coming weeks and months, to your feedback, suggestions and
questions on this "digital finance package", which is closely in line with the rationale of the
ecosystem that I have just outlined.
In other words, we have the opportunity to that the held in
demonstrate today discussions
recent years between the Banque de France, the different players in the innovative financial
ecosystem and other supervisory authorities, the relationships of trust established between
us, the complementary expertise, the shared experiments and knowledge, have a concrete
and tangible effect: that of further strengthening the dynamics of an ecosystem that is destined
to
count in the future of the European financial sector.
*
Thank you for your attention.