John Iannis Mourmouras: The political economy of Europe's
monetary union - an update
Speech by Professor John Iannis Mourmouras, Deputy Governor of the Bank of Greece, at the
European Public Law Organization, Sounio, 30 August 2017.
* * *
Introduction
It is my great pleasure to be here with you today at the EPLO Academy, near Cape Sounion,
where the famous ancient Temple of Poseidon, the god of the sea, rests (built in the 5th century
BC). I am grateful to the President of EPLO Professor Spyridon Flogaitis for his kind invitation to
deliver this inaugural lecture.
It seems that Poseidon is in no good mood today, it's quite windy in Sounio!
My speech today will be structured in three sections: I will firstly talk about the political economy
of the European Union, giving a more detailed picture of the EU's political, institutional and
economic landscape, as it has been shaped so far. In the second section, I intend to take a brief
look into the EU's major policies including monetary policy, with particular reference to the role of
the ECB and the debate on an exit strategy from the ECB's ongoing accommodative policies.
Finally, I will offer some brief remarks about Greece's place in the eurozone in the post-MoU era.
As most of the participants in the EPLO's Academy are of purely legal background, it is my
intention to keep to the legal and institutional aspects of the topics of my speech and spare you
the economic and financial ins and outs of the EU's economic policies, which, as you may
imagine, abound in technical complexity.
1. The political economy of the European Union
1.1 Incomplete architecture - institutional
The euro area is emerging from a deep crisis that has challenged the ability of its
macroeconomic policy framework to deliver stability and prosperity. The setup of the Economic
and Monetary Union, as initially conceived and laid down in the 1997 Maastricht Treaty, has
proven unsustainable and unstable. The global financial crisis which began 10 years ago and led
to the European Union's worst recession in its six-decade history, did not start in Europe, but EU
institutions and Member States had to take unprecedented action to counter its impact and
address the shortcomings of the original design of the Economic and Monetary Union. Important
lessons have been drawn as a result of the crisis, with new legislation, policy instruments and
institutions put in place to strengthen the governance of the euro area, as we will examine in
more detail in the following sections of my speech.
As robust as it may be today, the EMU remains incomplete. The "monetary" component of the
EMU is successfully developed, as illustrated by the role of the European Central Bank (ECB).
However, the "economic" component is still lagging behind, with less integration at EU level
hampering its ability to support fully the euro area's single monetary policy, but also national
economic policies. There is a need to strengthen the political will across the board, among
Member States, between Member States and EU institutions, and restore the confidence of the
general public. There should be no complacency about the need to strengthen EMU architecture.
1.2 Union in diversity
First and foremost, we need to remind ourselves that the political economy of the EU concerns a
Union of 28 Member Stateswith different economic histories, diverse financial systems, credit
and regulatory philosophies. Yet, the integration of financial markets and their corresponding
regulation have been considered central to achieving a European single market since at least the
1980s. In this context, the governance of EU financial services has gradually moved from the
national to the European level under the complementary dynamic of the
effective internationalisation of capital. As banking and finance progressively internationalised,
EU member state governments have had to open up to pan-European initiatives; otherwise, it
was feared that European economies would become increasingly marginalised in global capital
markets. Another force that pushed towards European financial integration is a recurrent theme
in the history of the EU: crisis-driven regulatory responses, i.e. when Member State governments
and economic actors look to Europe for solutions to comparative problems affecting them all.
Under extraordinary circumstances such as the recent crisis that the EU experienced, the
supranational regulation of financial services represents the best solution to deal with the
challenges posed by the internationalisation of capital.
Allow me here to make a small digression to remind you how important European law, and the
contribution of legal experts such as yourselves, is for further integration in the creation of new
law based on the two cornerstones of EU action. Indeed, any integratory step towards a fiscal
and economic union must take heed of the and principles, which
subsidiarity proportionality
regulate the exercise of powers by EU. More specifically, in areas in which the European Union
does not have exclusive competence, the principle of subsidiarity, as laid down in Article 5.3
TEU, defines the circumstances in which it is preferable for action to be taken by the Union,
rather than the Member States. The criteria for applying those two principles are set out in
Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality annexed to the
Treaties.
Article 5.3 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU)
"The Union shall act only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be
sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level,
but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at
Union level."
Like the principle of subsidiarity, the principle of proportionality seeks to set actions taken by EU
institutions within specified bounds. Under this rule, the action of the EU must be limited to what
is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaties.
Article 5(4) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU)
"Under the principle of proportionality, the content and form of Union action shall not exceed what
is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaties."
1.3 Unemployment - growth
In what follows I will give you very briefly some figures and charts about the current
macroeconomic conditions in the euro area, more specifically about growth, investment and
unemployment in the euro area.
Today, the EU economy is expanding for the fifth consecutive year. Employment is getting close
to its pre-crisis peak, as more than 5 million jobs have been created since early 2013 in the euro
area. Banks are now stronger and better capitalised, investment is picking up, and public
finances are in better shape. Eurozone growth reached an annualized pace of 2.1% in the last
quarter, its best level in 5 years, which is considered high by recent standards.
The unemployment rate has been slowly reduced and now stands at its lowest level since 2009
(at around 9% in the eurozone), compared with 12% after the region's debt crisis (see Figures 4
and 5).

It is true that the protracted economic downturn and divergences between euro area countries
have been the result of pre-crisis imbalances and shortcomings in the way the EMU responded
to major shocks. The diverging experiences of the Member States after the crisis have renewed
the focus on achieving convergence across the EU. Convergence may indeed be important for
the cohesion of the monetary union, as it helps to ensure that the gains from economic
integration are shared. Countries such as Germany are now well above their pre-crisis GDP
levels, but for other countries such as Italy, GDP is only expected to return to its pre-crisis level in
the mid-2020s (last quarter GDP 1.5% on a yearly basis).
While recent economic developments are indeed encouraging, a lot remains to be done to
overcome the legacy of the crisis years. The euro area is finally witnessing a decent economic
recovery, but it would be wrong to be complacent. The single currency remains vulnerable in its
institutional architecture, and faces many unresolved problems at the national level. A lack of
productivity catch-up - lower productivity growth in countries with lower initial per capita income
and productivity - explains much of the lack of income convergence within the euro area.
Countries with lower initial productivity levels can have larger productivity gains from labour and
product market reforms than countries with higher initial productivity. In light of the above,
structural reforms are critical to reducing productivity gaps to foster real income convergence.
All in all, the current situation is much improved, but economic reforms in the goods, capital and
labour markets which remove barriers to competition and increase market flexibility are essential
for the smooth functioning of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). Such reforms are key to
raising productivity and employment in the euro area, thereby supporting the growth potential of
the euro area in the long run. What is also needed is investment in talent and human resources,
on which the European Union is currently lagging behind its major competitors.
1.4 The political landscape: where is Europe headed?
Unlike earlier in the year, when the prospect of a populist far-right turn of the French electorate in
the presidential elections in May was a serious cause for concern, political instability is no longer
at the top of the agenda for the Member States of the EU. Global markets have been nervous
lately, but the source of their worries this time isn't in the eurozone. Instead, political
as the White House under President Trump is in turmoil.
uncertainty has risen around the US,
The UK, meanwhile, is struggling after the 2016 upset vote of the British people to leave the
European Union to address the political and economic challenges of Brexit. From an economic
point of view, such uncertainty tends to support the euro against the dollar and the sterling pound.
From a political point of view, the centre electorate seems to have been unsettled by what is
happening in the UK and US and has been frightened off the extremist-populist parties.
There are of course seminal elections ahead in the European continent, in Germany, Europe's
biggest economy and the eurozone's dominant power, in September. The likelihood that no
major political upsets will come from Germany in September is indeed among a number of
forces combining to generate fresh optimism for the European project, which has seen quite a
few lows in the past few years.
Of course, the will influence everything from European relations with
German electoral result
the US, China, Russia and Turkey and, certainly, the future course of the European Union and, in
particular, the success of French President Emmanuel Macron's initiative to reboot the eurozone
through his proposals for a common budget and finance minister for the region. Macron is openly
pro-European and keen to bolster support for the EU - reinforcing the idea that the bloc can help
its citizens secure a better life - as a key part of his strategy to counter populism and
Euroscepticism. Support for the EU, battered by long crises over debt and migration, has begun
to recover. The EU's own latest Eurobarometer report on public opinion, published this month,
found that trust in the EU has risen to 42%, from 36% a year ago and 32% in late 2015 (see
Figure 7).
Outside the UK, dissatisfaction with the EU doesn't translate into support for leaving. This is not
to say that European citizens suddenly disregard the EU's dysfunctional nature and efficiency
problems. A survey of 10 EU countries published in June by the Pew Research Center found that
Europeans remain critical of the bloc. A median of 46% disapproved of the EU's handling of its
long economic crisis, while 66% disapproved of its management of the refugee crisis.
Any talk of Frexit, Dexit (and so on) is now definitely off the cards. Although support for the euro
area is now higher, it is highest in countries with high income levels. Indeed, countries that have
experienced high growth since the introduction of the single currency are more likely to have
seen an increase in citizen support for the euro. Brexit will certainly bring a major upheaval in the
EU's economy, which cannot as yet be predicted.
Improving economic growth in much of Europe, especially in the 19-country euro currency zone,
has helped blunt some of the discontent of European citizens with the European Union, creating
a unique opportunity to take action to make the institutional changes that are required if the EU
wants to prosper. Improved opinion of the EU coincides with renewed economic confidence in
most of the European countries surveyed. In recent years, many Europeans have been dispirited
about economic conditions in their country. Now, as the economy in a number of nations has
begun to recover, the public mood is brightening.
There is now positive momentum for the EU and its Member States. The Franco-German axis
is once again set to enter into operation and push ahead with reforms that will help the EU stand
on its own two feet or "take [its] destiny into [its] own hands", as Angela Merkel recently put it.
After the Brexit decision, France and Germany seem to agree that a medium-term roadmap for
deepening the EU, and eurozone governance in particular, is needed. French President Macron
has proposed a "new deal" to help address Europe's economic dilemmas to entice Germany and
other northern eurozone countries to allow the currency bloc to pool financial resources to shield
members from future crises. (Of course, President Macron first has to go through necessary
labour reforms in his own country). Northern EU countries -which have long called for structural
overhauls in France-may be unwilling to sign on to his proposals for the currency area,
including increased spending by Germany and other wealthy economies and a shared crisis
budget.
Democratic accountability
The EMU setup and the operation of the euro area has thus far been characterised by low
democratic accountability, as it is based on "output legitimacy", that is, legitimacy that
depends on a system's capacity to achieve the citizen's goals and solve their problems
effectively and efficiently. The higher its capacity, the more legitimate the system. Its operation
prioritises results and output effectiveness over an input-oriented democratic
decisionmaking (legitimacy derived from the way in which decisions are made and not by the results of
these decisions produce) architecture that might be less effective.
One of the lessons drawn from the crisis is that there is a need for to
more transparency
bolster support for the European integration project on behalf of the citizens. Europeans reacted
to all the opaque decision-making made at the height of the crisis by unelected officials and
technocrats away from the democratic center by massively and repeatedly turning to populist,
anti-European parties.
can indeed be improved through more transparency, but in
Accountability in EMU governance
order to fully address the existing shortcomings of EMU governance and thus set the conditions
for the European economy to work, a political union and European federal-type institutions are
needed. At the moment, there is little appetite on the part of member states for relinquishing their
national sovereignty in fiscal matters and transfer it to the EU level, which would require a major
institutional change in the European Union. So far, the European Commission's proposed short-
term measures to improve the democratic accountability of EMU are: setting up a strengthened
and more formalised dialogue with the European Parliament, a proposal to integrate the fiscal
compact into the EU legal framework and progress towards a stronger external representation of
the euro area. Over the long term, steps towards ensuring the democratic accountability of EMU
governance and decision-making could include: a full-time permanent chair of the Eurogroup, the
Eurogroup established as an official council configuration, a fully unified external representation
of the Euro area, the setting up of a euro area Treasury and a common finance minister (i.e. a
common fiscal capacity), the setting up of a European Monetary Fund and the integration of
remaining intergovernmental arrangements in the EU.
Apart from the proposed agenda by French President Macron, who has argued that without
institutional change, the euro could fail within 10 years, reform proposals have also been put
forward by the European Commission in its White Paper on the Future of Europe under
President Juncker. As there is still no political support for a fully federalised European Union, the
European Commission's five alternative scenarios reflect the current realistic choices that stand
before the European Union.
The table below shows the five alternative scenarios proposed by the European Commission in
this White Paper, which focus on differentiated degrees of "deepening" cooperation. It should be
pointed out that the "Those Who Want More Do More" scenario formally recognises for the first
time the model of differentiated/multi-speed integration (already endorsed by the leaders of the
four biggest Member States, i.e. Germany, France, Spain and Italy), an idea dating back to
German Chancellor Willy Brandt in 1974. This White Paper reflects a significant shift in the
European integration debate, since a "Europe at many speeds" had been mainly advanced by
intergovernmentalist forces, but stumbled on the adamant opposition of pro-Europeans
(federalists), in favour of centralised/supranational EU governance.
Further progress on European integration issues will of course be slow ahead of the German
elections on 24 September that will be decisive in many ways for the future path that the
European Union, but the question is now all about whether EU affairs will take a turn for the better
thereafter. In any event, the European Commission is set to present its first set of conclusions on
the roadmap for the future of the EU at the December 2017 European Council.
As should be expected from the European Union, there will not be any radical changes overnight,
but rather a process ofincremental change to improve the political economy and governance of
the EU and the eurozone. In my view, this is the best chance to restore faith in the European
integration project and show that it is capable of protecting its citizens.
2. Towards a complete economic and monetary union/ an update of economic policies
Future steps towards the completion of the EMU have been laid down in the well-known "Five
Presidents' report", divided into two stages (short-term and long-term steps), as shown in the
table below.
2.1 Monetary policy: towards an exit strategy
According to Article 127 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the
primary objective of the European System of Central Banks (Eurosystem) is "to maintain price
stability. Without prejudice to the objective of price stability, the ESCB supports the general
economic policies of the Union with a view to contributing to the achievement of the objectives of
the Union as laid down in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union". This wording suggests that
the Treaty assigns overriding importance to price stability, as the most significant contribution
that monetary policy can make to achieve the objectives of the European Union, i.e. favourable
economic environment and high level of employment.
Under the extraordinary circumstances of the crisis, the ECB went beyond its "price stability"
mandate and already since 2008 used unconventional monetary policy tools such as large
liquidity injections and the securities markets program to ensure that debt markets remain
functional. Faced with the EU's worst recession in its six-decade history, the ECB needed to act
resolutely to counter its impact and address the shortcomings of the initial setup of the economic
and monetary union. In 2012, ECB President Draghi pledged to do "whatever it takes to preserve
the euro" and announced the Outright Monetary Transactions (OMTs) programme to allow the
ECB to buy sovereign bonds of euro area countries. Apart from OMTs, the ECB launched a
quantitative easing (QE) programme in 2015 (asset purchases of public sector bonds), which
was expanded to asset purchases of corporate sector bonds in 2016 (now worth €2 trillion). We
are now entering a debate on how to orchestrate the exit from the ECB's QE, in terms of its
timing and its sequencing. Against this background, last month's ruling by the German
constitutional court to refer to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) the case with regard to the
ECB's €2 trillion quantitative easing programme is of seminal importance. The action
perpetuates legal ambiguity for at least another year - even though the ECJ is expected to decide
in the ECB's favour.
Clearly at some point in time, sooner or later, there will be an end to these unconventional
monetary policies. The crucial question will revolve then around timing and sequencing, namely
'when these policies will end' and 'if tapering should come first and then be followed by a rate
hike' or the reverse. On the other hand, a premature normalisation of monetary policy (just like in
2008 and 2011), either in terms of interest rate hikes or in terms of proper tapering or according
to the ECB's preferred wording "orderly adjustment", entails the following two risks: the first is the
risk of a relapse, namely the ECB shouldn't abruptly stop loose monetary policy as a result, for
instance, of a temporary inflation spike and not supported by the economic fundamentals. The
second risk is the risk of financial instability, once interest rates start to rise.
2.2 Fiscal Policy
The idea of a Fiscal Union has gained new impetus and is again on the table and there seems to
be a future towards integrated fiscal policies in the eurozone. It is true that integration within the
eurozone has somewhat stalled since the creation of a Banking Union in 2014 (which I will
analyse in the following section). However, the relevant debate has been given new impetus by
the election in France of Emmanuel Macron, who has publicly advocated a common eurozone
budget and a Finance Minister. Encouraging signs have been coming from the German side as
well, as there is likely to be indeed readiness of the newly elected German government to push
forward the European integration process. However, Germany has been accused of seeing fiscal
union as a vehicle to achieve more austerity in the eurozone! It has in fact been argued that
Germany has 'no alternative' to a revival of the Franco-German axis to reboot EMU governance
and that is why it has put forward proposals for advancing European integration of its own, such
as the proposal for transforming the European Stability Mechanism into a European Monetary
Fund, as it builds expertise and takes on a continuous fiscal surveillance of Member States. This
would understandably suit the German agenda which has long criticised the more lenient
supervision of eurozone countries' compliance with fiscal discipline rules (under the revised
Stability and Growth Pact).
The latest on the field of common fiscal policy in the eurozone is a proposal from the European
Commission called European safe bond. The point is the following: investors can buy
government debt into the euro area as a whole, rather than into one particular member state.
This is different from a pooling of national government debt issuance, known as common
Eurobond, which remains a political taboo in Germany. Sovereign debt across the eurozone
could be bundled into a new financial instrument (ESB) and sold, if you like as a European brand,
to investors. Such an idea could have potential benefits to many stakeholders, including the ECB.
As you know, the ECB is a major buyer in the secondary market of the europeriphery. Issuing
bonds backed by all 19 eurozone countries would be the best way to keep borrowing costs down
if the ECB were to taper or indeed to end its QE programme at some point in time. Moreover, the
ECB itself may want to replace national government bonds in its own balance sheet with
European safe bonds.
2.3 Banking Union
The crisis paved the way for a major paradigm change in the regulation of banks, i.e. the
introduction of common prudential rules to create a level playing field for all the financial
institutions of the EU (some 8,300 banks across the EU), also known as the Single Rulebook,
comprising secondary law (Directives, Regulations, Decisions), regulatory and implementing
technical standards drafted by the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) and soft-law rules
such as guidelines and recommendations.
The Single Rulebook applies to all 28 EU member states and marks a shift from the previously
predominant regulatory philosophy of minimum harmonization of national rules and the provision
of a European passport based on mutual recognition across the EU to maximum harmonization.
Three of the most important single-rulebook pieces are directly related to banking. These are the
Capital Requirements Directive IV (CRD IV) and the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), the
Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) and the Deposit Guarantee Scheme Directive
(DGSD), which lay down capital requirements for banks and create regulation to the prevention
and management bank failures, including a minimum level of protection for depositors.
To this end, along with the major regulatory change in the banking sector, there was swift
progress towards institutional change with the creation of the Banking Union (BU): pan-European
centralised bodies for the supervision and resolution of banks, indispensable to ensure financial
stability in the euro area.
The creation of the Banking Union comprises three pillars based on the single rulebook as the
foundation (see Figure 10 below): a Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), a Single Resolution
Mechanism (comprising a Single Resolution Board and a Single Resolution Fund) and a
common deposit insurance scheme (yet to be approved).
Under the first pillar, the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) was established without treaty
change. By unanimous vote the Council decided to confer "specific tasks concerning policies
relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions" on the European Central Bank, in
accordance with Article 127(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
But a treaty change in the future should not be ruled out. The European Central Bank now directly
supervises 123 systemically significant banks and, at the same time, national supervisors work
closely together within an pan-European supervisory system to supervise the so-called "less
significant institutions" (around 5,500) in the 19 Member States of the euro area.
A Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) is the necessary complement of the first pillar. The
rationale behind it is to avoid the risk of bank bail-outs by national governments, and for the
private sector to bear the cost rather than the taxpayer. In the case of failing banks, the Single
Resolution Board may decide on resolution, to be covered by funds drawn from a Single
Resolution Fund (€55 billion by 2023) that banks themselves pay into. Any residual fiscal burden
on sovereigns should be contained through a federal fiscal backstop.
The missing link from the Banking Union structure is its third pillar. The Commission's 2015
proposal for a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS) builds on the existing framework
under the Deposit Guarantee Scheme Directive (2014/49/EU) which provides for a more uniform
degree of deposit guarantee for all retail depositors.
2.4 Capital markets union
Since 2015, the European Commission's new flagship project is the creation of a Capital Markets
Union to build a single integrated capital market for all 28 Member States. The Capital Markets
Union (CMU) is a plan of the European Commission consisting of a mix of regulatory and
nonregulatory reforms (33 measures in total), aiming to better connect savings to investments based
on a single rulebook that will create a level-playing field for the provision of investment services
and offer private firms the possibility to raise capital through issuance of equity and debt
anywhere in the EU.
I should remind you that the European economy has been traditionally bank-based. It is indicative
that 70% of capital raised in the EU comes from the banking system, compared with just 20% in
the US. So, the idea is to provide alternative sources of financing and more opportunities for
consumers and institutional investors. For companies, especially SMEs and start-ups, the CMU
means accessing more funding opportunities, such as venture capital and crowdfunding. The
CMU also puts a strong focus on sustainable and green financing: as the financial sector begins
to help sustainability-conscious investors to choose suitable projects and companies, the
Commission is determined to lead global work on supporting these developments.
A well-functioning, diversified and deeply integrated capital market is of key relevance for the
European Central Bank for three reasons: first of all, the integration of capital markets facilitates
the transmission of single monetary policy in the euro area, secondly it contributes to
macroeconomic and financial stability and thirdly, it supports risk-sharing in the private sector
across the EU.
3. Greece in the eurozone in the post-MoU era
Finally, turning to my country Greece, this is a fortunate moment in the following sense. Greece
today is again at a crossroads, but this time may be different. Under some preconditions, a case
could be made for a strong turnaround of the economy. If the Greek authorities remain vigilant
with no complacency (no delays, no back-tracking) and we ALL roll up our sleeves and stick to
structural reforms and the privatisation agenda, and, on the other hand, our lenders, deliver on
their promises about debt relief sooner rather than later, i.e pacta sunt servanda principal should
apply to both lenders and borrowers, then, I'm quite optimistic that the return to European
normality after the completion of the current programme in August next year is within reach.
The Greek economy's progress during the last eight years of adjustment has been
unprecedented, both in terms of fiscal and external adjustment of more than 15 percentage
points of GDP. The huge twin deficits turned into surpluses. Last year, the primary surplus was
4.2% of GDP, outperforming the target of 0.5%. The current account during the last two years
had effectively been in balance from a 15% deficit eight years ago.
At the same time, sweeping structural reforms have been implemented, covering the pensions
system, the health system, labour markets, product markets, the business environment, public
administration, etc. Recapitalisation and restructuring have taken place in the banking system
and significant institutional reforms have been initiated aiming at reducing the volume of NPLs.
Moreover, there is evidence that the economy has been undergoing a rebalancing towards
tradable, export-oriented sector: the share of exports of goods and services in GDP increased
from 19% in 2009 to 28.2% in 2016, with most of the increase coming from exports of goods.
In closing, I would like to stress that Greece belongs to the core of Europe. Its future is within the
eurozone, within the group of solidary countries, to the people of whom we, the Greeks are
grateful for their financial support. Despite all these years of uncertainty and austerity, this is the
overwhelming wish of the majority of the Greek people still today, within the core of Europe. This
is our legacy as a nation that goes back to our history and our tradition and, more recently,
expressed by a visionary Greek politician, a great European statesman, who stood above political
parties, late President Konstantinos Karamanlis, who showed the Greek people the way forward,
the European way.
Concluding remarks
The sovereign debt crisis in the Eurozone revealed how vulnerable the euro area's economic and
monetary framework was to external shocks, especially taking into account the constraints of no
bail-out and no debt restructuring. The euro area was not equipped to tackle large crises and did
not have the safety nets and institutions to respond promptly to the severe challenges that such
crises entail. So it had to buy time and resort to quick fixes that would bring it back on a more
tab