The Statesman.
London, England, 1810-03-24 00:00:00

t
,f •

•
i

\'

,

• •
. "PRISONERS OF W. 411.
Lord UMland's first tnotiotir4.on ttrurtday,
March 22, to address his Majslaty for—
Copies of all correspondence which may have passed
between the Transport, or any other department of Govern-
ment, and any other persons authorized to treat on the part of
the Government of France, respect ing the exchange of prisoners
of war since the Ist of ept. 1809. Also a statement of all
communicating. mate by the Transport Board, or the Chair*
men thereof, either to the Board of Admiralty, or to the
First Lord Commissioner, respecting an exchange 'of pri-
soners of war between Great Britain since the Ist of Septem-
ber; and also copies of all official letters which have passed
between the Adinirialty and Transport Board, relative to an
exchange of prisoners of war, since the Ist of September
last.

PROTEST.
Ist, Because the long period of time which has elapsed
since the,commencemeett of hostilities, without the ettablish-
meld of a cartel for the exchange of prisoners between Great
Britain And France, has been a cruel aggravation of the ca.
lamitiesof war, and is a disgrace to the age in which we
live. _ _ .

Ydly, Because it Irks -been repeatedly asserted in French
publication+, and is distinctly stated in a paper published by
ratborit v of the Preach Governaneat, and purporting to be a
dispatch from the Duke of Cailore to Baron Ruell, Minister
'of Foreign A fain in Holland, bearing date the 24th of .1 atm-
ary,. 1811.), that the &florets( proposals for appointing Coin-
nsissioners to treat of regeneroi exchange of prisonersat *or-
Wt. v)as to he attributed to his Majesty's Ministers; and
such assertions and statements have hitherto remained no-
contradkted.
idly, Because a charge of inhumanity, so solemnly and
publicly preferred, seemed to us to call for an early and satis-
factory refutation, if fate; for tilts strict and severe punish-
ment of his Majesty's Ministers, if trite and whether, for
the purpose of vindicating our characterns a Oaf iOll from the
foul aspersion of our enemy. or of convicting those who, by
their counsel-5 or neglect of ditty, have exposed us to them,
Als MAIO 'KM of the information prayed fur in the Address,
einuseti lobe propoeuseasonabk, and necessary.
(SIGNED)
Cowl,* a
Ci.trrotr (Darnley) . •
DonouGuatoan '
KING
• ROSALYN
STAFFORD
HI I.IADOROVGIR(DOWAShire)
to/0011BI( (limukilly)
• RADO WRIC

VAISALL TIOLLAND
GREY
I LAUDERDAILZ
SPENCE*
.Dsßsir
PoNSONIiT (Besborough)
MAD:maims
LOCAN
CARRINGTON
/SALSA (CRIFiIiA)

LORD ROLLAND'S SECOND MOTION.

to address his Majesty for

An Account of the dates of all communications from per-
sons authorized by the Government of France. to the Trans-
port Board or other Department of Government, reverting
.ttsc Exchange of Prisoners, since the Ist of September. 1809,
Rod of all answers thereto, distinguishiog those which re-
lated to the terms of exchange, and those which related to
the appointment of Cammissiouers to oegociate thereupon.

PROTEST.
Ist, Because the only arguments which, in the previous de.
bate. had been urged against the pmdsclion of nil Corres-
pondence between the Agents of the French Government/and
the Transport Board, respecting nn exchange of prisoners,
could not apply to an Address for the commtuticatioo of the
dates of such Correspondence.
The Rossible inconveniencies restilOng from a-disclosure of
particular topics in discussion, and the apprehension of dis-
turbing, by such disclosure, the progress of a negociatina
stated t ► be yet pending, appeared to have. influenced the
Hassell) their decision on the former occasion t but a motion
for the commtwication of dates, if acceded to, could have
led to no di,elosore of particular', nor by any possibility have
interrupted the progress of any negociation.
Id, Because the production of the dates of the corres-
pondence referred to, might have been soffeient to vindicate
his Majesty's Governmeot from the odious imputation of
neglect, by affording is proof that the failure of a plan for
estaMishing a cartel. bad arisen front no delay in answering
the propus.ils of the French Government on the subject.
Because his Majesty's Ministers having resisted the pro-
dueihm of the dates of the several papers and communications
referred to, sserecalied upon in the course of dehnte to dis-
claim any delay in auswertnitbe proposals of the French
veronica. and they distinctly refits: 11 to make any deciara-
ti us. that no suck delay hAd ocenrred.
4t ,iy, Rev:use his Majeity's Ministers, called ppott in the
course of debate to pledge themselves to the future produc-
tion of the correspondence or date) thereof, whenever the .w..
gociation stated by them to be peodiug. should be finally
clo-ed, gave no such pledge, and returned DO answeV whatever
to the question so pointedly addressed to them.
(SIGNED)
WILLIAM FREDICIIIeK AiLSA (Ciillili9)
1/ 4SSALL HOILLAWD Cowrea
GREY CLIVTON (Darnley)
Ari4IIIDALC DONOUGIIMORE

SPICNICZa
ERBI •
PO *4 SON Or (Besborough)
At.ogiLtaLE
LOC* It
CA 11.1INGTOS

KING
Ross Lye(
StA FFO RD
Hii.i.sunaorcu(Downshire)
Po vs° (imoki11))
LaNspowsz

LORD GREY'S MOTION.
Thnt a Secret Committee be appointed to inquire into the
caws which have prevented the e.tahlislaraeot of a Cartel,
for a general exchange of Prisoners between this country and
Trainee."
PROTEST.
' • lst. Because the appointment of a Secret Committee was
the only remaining mode of proceeding, was net liable to the
objections urged against former motions on the subject. wa
consonant to the usage of Parliament, and expressly sanction-
ed by a recent precedent directly in point.
' A Cnmuuttee having ben nppoinied by the House of Com-
mons in li9B, examined and considered the treatment of
French prisoners in this country, the causes' that bad led In
the suspension of a cartel, and the negociations which had
taken place between Ike two Governments upon the subject.
They reported thereupon, and tit the instance of the Wale of
Commons, their report was eurnmunscated to all States in
amity with Great-Britain, for the purpose of giving a public
and solemn relhiation of the calumnies iudustciously circulated
in the publications of the enemy.
241 Y, Because the rejection of the only remaining mode of
proceeding seemed to us to imply h determinations to resist all
investigatton of a transaction in which the character of the
country and the interests of bunianity were deeply involved ;
and as we cmild.not disguise front ourselves tie impression
which limit be produced on the public, and on Europe,. by
the silence of Milliners and thedettga of .tiw-hionsm-wirt
&Rep asisi•inn‘ter messed 111111 bur solemn protest, ngtsiast the
rejection of all inquiry into the truth of a chtsrge which those
implicated-in it have neither attempted to refute by evidence
or argument, nor ventured to repel by a distinct and simple
contradiction of the allegations on which it is founded.
(Swann)
11"ttt.txx Facneasc LUCA
•VASSALL H•LLANI) C•11111INGTOI •
Gner A►i.ss (CassilM).
LAUHERDALE Cowraa . '
Secoesis I Cm rya* ( Darnley)

l..~rauowp•s
FONI ERSET

DERBY
PossoNnir (Besborough)
ALIBIiatARI.F.

-

!e
TRY, STATESMAN..

• `' •

.1.

. le

~~~_»

, ~

-- -
might the place have been assneeid had it ietwgniznime 4
the works and 'garrison just' 'telCli speed; of attack ?-1
think, if the armament demi to act medial Antwerp had
been assembled at Smartie( by Sel of Augest, which woold
have been the 7th day after the, lint division sailed from the
Downs, the whole might bah been befit* the place by the
Bthi I mean by the whole, that the heavy artillery also
might have been there. ,
Exclusive of the heavy artillery, if the plat+ bad been re-
ported in a state to admit of the defences being stormed, when
do rat conceive that the armament might have been before
the place, with necessary means for storm* the place? I
think that if the place had been
reverted assailable, an e'er-
tine might have been made for the troops to have arrived by
the 6th at night, and that of course the assault wodid have
beeu immediately made.
When you Wile that the army might have been before the
place on the Pith, with the heavy artillery.for a boinbarduzent,
is it your Opinion that the hoinbardineett could have beencion-
menced on the night of the Bth ? The bombardment might
have commented the moment the mortars could have been
placed in their beds.
Rave you been yourself in the neighbourhood of Antwerp,
and when? 1 was at Antwerp in 1794. .
In what military situation were you at the period you
wereat Antwerp in 1794? I was Deputy Quarter-Master-
General to the British army.
From your recollection of the ground, and particularly
of the suburbs of Antwerp, do you conceive operations could
have been commenced against the town a ithnut the necessity
of breaking ground at a distance and proceeding by regular
approaches ? There is a very considerable suburb on the
road leading to Breda, which is the side upon which we
should have approached Antwerp, under cover of which I
ma milliard to think that batteries for cannon might have •
been established a akin the distance of. six hundred yards,
without regular approaches being made fur that purpose.
When you state that the army might have been before
Antwerp with the necessary means for as bombardment upon
the Stb, upon what scale of ordnance is your calculation
founded ? The proportion of inortant and guns would have
depended upon the Judgment of the &beer commanding the
artillery and the etsimmutding engiueer ; but 1 slioula con-
ceive, as fief as my humble jiMgintist goes, that about an
equal proportion ut mortaps and grins, mot I should have
imagined likewise that about thirty pieces of hear.) ordnance
world have been hs many as our means would have enabled
as
,t) carry up in the time mentioned. •
What espeetatien -of reduriui the town of Antwerp by
orb an attack obs'you have now de-cnbetithe British army
'would have had the means of making,thaidd you have cut.
Gained ? 1 should imagine that by a vigorous houto.!rdinent '
and cannonade from the number of pieces of ordnance 1 have
mentioned, so populous* town as Ant ii erp is,apid,garrisoncil,,
badly. as I believe it then 'tvits,-might have been speedily in-
timidated into asurreuder..

Might not such an altiiiiit upon the town of Antwerp have
i been materially assisted by tile use of tae rockets tout at-
-1 tendeil theoriny ? I had an opportunity of eeenig these rocs
1 kets used at Fluihing ; they certainly are very tiemendims in
their appearance, and alarm considerably • those agninst
whom they are directed, and unquestionably would set hie to
any combustible substance they met with.
Supposing the•town of Antwerp in the paseassiona of the
Britt'' arms; would it, in your judgment, have been practi-
cable under the protection 4 the homes to have taken 111C41111
for destroying the arsenals and the ships of war building on
toe slips at Antwerp, notwithstanding any opposition that
could be reasonably expel ted Irons the Citadel ? We cotild
only have pbssewed owrselves of a part of Antwerp, that
part which was Wilder the immediate influence of the Citadel
of course we could not have possessed; but I do ronecjve that
f under cover of the buildings we might have established guns
that Would have borne upon the ships on the stocks toad nese-
, nal, which in probability would have succeeded in destroying
the z realer part of them ; when oace a eitudagration tout
place, it is to be presumetit would have spread.
Suppoilag the communication between the town and the
arsenal to be open, would it not have been pra, ticahle at
night, without exposing the troops to any very see tetury
from the fire of the Citadel, to have carried all des. rile ions
of materiall for setting fire to the ships, and to have applied
them etlectually for that pun; se ? I understand Na it the Ar-
senal is surrounded by a wall, and therefore I do cmiceive it
would have been ditficult to have desttoyed it by those moans ;
I taink the only chaiwe we had ofiOstrosing it was lis how-
beets, shells. and rockets; I doubtorehetaer we shosds have
heritable to have approached it so near as to have done it by
11111111. •
If the wall to which you allude is a wall hot erected for
purposes of defence, but to prevent pillage of the materials
i ill tne Arsenal, could there /lave been any dilllculty by the
fire of 'al ['fiery in vetting that wall so as ‘ii gtse to toe truth's
a free acce-s to the Arsenal I No doubt artilfery wit de-
stroy any brick wall or moderately stone wait : hut I Iniiik
the object might have beet, faceted
....,0 rauut haviing recourse
to shame menus,
After several questionirespecting the'state of Antwerp, the
Taloa ing were put :
Upon the whole. did yea consider the town of Antwerp
as a respectable fortification. eras &large populous city wOn
a rampart mid ditch, which had in a military sense Wiest
into neglect i Certainly in the stale I saw Antwerp it could
not be called a respectable fortification—fir from it.
Supposing the army had cimrinued in health, do you eon-
conceive that the disembarkation of the army might base
been elected you the 25th of Allgl4lit, near Saluvliet, wituout
prejudice to its safety from any force the etiealy might have
urought itgainst it in the held ? Ido think, ant) indeed. Fain
sure, that--
if the array shad been in a state to have acted
against the enemy on the 45th of August, it would have•beca
landed, and I should not have twee appreheusive that ihe
sufe:y of it would have been risked.
Are you of opini ~,,, or have yin, reason to know, that if the
army had then been in a healthy state, it would have beet the
deteriniaition of the Commander in Chief to land the army,
with it view to open the Scheldt by the seduction of Litho and
Liefkenslieeik, if Sir Richard Strarhan had required such
an aid from the army ? I have no doubt but that such an at-
tempt would have been made. ..
Vith what prospect of seeress dorm conceive that such an
attempt might have been made upon the 25th, suaposing the
army had been then in a completely effective state, and in
perfect health ? Reckoning confidently, as I do, upon the
gallantry and spirit of enterprise of the nayy and the artily, I
entertain it sanguine belief that we might have sticceedea in
taking Liefbenshneik, and probably Lillis, which would have
opened the Scheldt for the wiry, and 'Died have led to tin-.
portant consequences.
1 What was your opinion previously to !ceiling, as to the
er. Mability of the success of the Expedition, according to
the originally projected plan, and the information received ?
' The accomplishment of all the objects of the Expedition ap-
pared to me to be from the first itoulaul, because they ight
tonally depended upon the state of the winds mid weather to
have enabled us to have entered the Scheldt; bat I. run et
opinion, that if Cadsand had been in, our possession, and we
hat reached Sandyliet by the Sd of August, there would have
been a very fair prospect of maces'. •
LTo whatetatioalla . ',ay iattiNitelk.e fnilnre at
the Ripedition kabala ntwerp? I *CO NAIDER THE
UNFORTUNATE NECESSITY WHICH OBLIGED
Tim WHOLE ARMAISESI T TO' II AVE BEEN AS-
SEMBLED IN TH E ROM POOT. AS le ATA Is TOTII F.
ULTERIOR OBJECPI OF THE EXPEDI TION s
AND I MUST CONCLUDE. THAT IT WOULD NOT
HAVE BEEN HAD RECOUUSE TO. HAD TII B IN-
TRICACIES OF THE SLOUGH PASSAGE BEEN
KNOWN BEFORE WE LEFT ENGLAN a. FOR
FROM THE: PRE VA LEN CE OF THE: SOUT fl-W EST
WINDS. AFTER OUR ARRIVAL OFF THE COAST
OF ZEALAND. IT BECAME IMPRACTICARLE
TO MOVE THE TRANSPORTS ROUND THE
NORTH-WEST SIDE OF WA LCII EREN, BY
W rl ICH THE ORIGINAL INTENTION TO CARRY
THE FORCE DESTINED TO OPEIC ATE AGAINST
ANTWERP UP THE WEST SCHEID T. WAS DE-
FEATED .50 THAT AN OPERATION. WHICH
MIGHTHAVE BEEN PERFORatEO IN FOUR
OR FIVE DAYS FROM THE DOWNS, WAS
LENGTHENED TO THREE WEEKS. THAT TIME
HAVING BEEN OCCUPIED IN PAssisn - Alai.
THE TRANSPORTS BEFORE. - MENTION,ED
THROUGH THE SLOUGH. A DISTANCE 'OF
ONLY' FIFTEEN MILES; AND I VIOULO BEG
LEAVE FURTHER TO ADD,. THAT IT la
GREATLY TO BE LAMENTED THAT THE
RIGHT WING OF THE ARSI Y.• DESTINED r 0
ACT AGAINST ANTWERP. HAD NOT BEEN LEO
AT ONCE FROM. THE.IPOIt<Nt4 INFO Tali sr Lk:-
LIN PASSAGE,.ASSIEN THE POSSESSION OF ('At)-
SAND, AND A SAFE' ENTRY INTO THE WEST
SCHELDT, WOULD !SAVE BEEN Si;;CUREO.
THUS LEAVING Tar,: rs VII' WI NG Ok"Til E
ARMY. ALLOTTED TO REDUCE. THF. ISLAND
OF W ALCH EREN, TO ITSELF.
Supposing the armament had been assembled at Santyliet is
the begisiniug of nwntls of August, itoslctsl of the rinse of
that month, a sat prosposlore )out n.ns tot uptuvon. would
ti.ere then flaw existeu of ultimate picet•4 1 I illeix I havr
already said. thiti if tie armament hid :to raved s4l,4floovites
II I the As& August, there wateil twee been a fair prbiliect of
success, or my huniate opt; tea. .
('L'o by continua.) •

I_ • r

•
3-.11 •

.* . ..

•

-

~

Ships at hbotet.
118 Sem-agile -

__- _

KUL D
• Pi
' At the, Palace of the Ti Mud,
NSPor.son, lieoperor of the French. ingotK 1.-,'!"10.
tectur'of the Confederation of the Rhiue. pded. Prs,
Swiss Confederation, &c. %lot of
is Upon the report of our al iii•ter of the General ,
Considering that there is a certain numberop o,r ni r6lett
detained in the state prisons, whom it not c tf
bring for trial before the Courts of Justice, no, let 4,46_rrit
That several Of them have, at different eporhs, ZIT?,
attempt upon-the safety of the State; tultnisi
attninuttey
condemned by the Courts to capital p
superior cousiderations oppose themselves to their
brought to trial;
-`l4l
ti That others, after having figured as chiefs of hull L.
the civil wars, have inken again t., dagraat crimes,
!m
otives ofgeneral interest, in like meaner, preveit taccvat,
..at
being brought to trial;
" That several of theta are either robbers of AL
men habituated to crime, wham our Courts are sZte!elott
condemn, although they should have a cehajoy 07tIs
guilt, and in whose eases they know, that their enha.„„±
would he contrary to the interest and safety of nnek.,7lll
" That a certain number of, them having bet%
by the police, in foreign countries, and haying N1,41:111,
!Sty.
cocmprnoeast
miseiithne ther be firsafe aightly tof the State; l nor set at killer. 'R-
N
•. that some of thew. belonging in the
united countries, are dangerous men, who matt neither '
on their trial, becati-e their crimes are either hr ap.,..1!
nature, or anterior to the union, and that they e0„11 ,:ti
set at liberty without compromising Ow interests Ouse -0
Cins•ideriag, however. that our justice respthoo7.
sure ourselves, that thane of our subjects who art detaitt
the sows i)risooS are Ow for lawful rllice,‘ Will a il:
tie public interest, and not from private eonstilwat*„
passions ;
" That it is At to establish, for the ezataiattlogepe
case, legal and solemn f nos;
" And that, in farming the process of this
the first decisiosis in 4: •I'rivy Couacil, and remora% ,
it,,hk.
every year, the cauvt.s of she eirtention, to eft. wheat,
it
St me shouldand that be proahm irs cgetlitizens , we should provide far the witty erds!
, ; •
" (tar
.council of Suite harm& beer heard,.
""We hate decreed'ami di, Jeer:4e stiTullotri
• • •• • 'THE OfteRRK .
ybieh professes to he for Ike of carte' $ll

iile
relief ~
tis France, proceeds to the enacting Ames ad ---"n
Which are compiled in five distinct aed *event!
The first, intaled " Foe/10MM fa h toissetied
in the State Prisees;: pcuvides that nu persoo erase
li-isolate prison, but by virtue of a &visas made opos ta
report of the Chief J or Um-Minister of Fah%
Privy Council. Iletentira isnot to be prdaoldheyst
' a year, twine by a new order.
The *mod Cleapter regulates " iasjketiei gsisM
sou.," and provides that Cosoraissinuers shall imput
once a mouth, make minute inquiry into every
atl'ecring th.m, and slischarge all such as are met
strictly according to law.
Thu; Third Chapter respects persons put in sartefittart‘,
8 Jist is to be fortosited by the Minister of Police.
Toe Fourth Clripter relates to the " regime aid ale*,
trallonStf the stale primer." The idlowatece ta tort pokis
is to be two frtutes per day, besides ordinary aisiatensite.
The Fifth Chapter lies the number of state pdtawsooki
are limited to eight, viz. the Castles of Bremer, 11"
patiskrattn, Pierre-Chanel, Fenestrelle, Curaprieloollin
caws.
E 4KKETS

• CORN EXCHANGE, Motes Z.
Wheat, - - SU.. 96.. 1064- Tick Beau+, ( 4‘) sp,
Fine ditto - - - 1104. 1154. Dots,
14)c
Burley, -
Malt, - - .ms .44
W. Peas (Boilers) 689. 751. Fine Flour - - . ft.*
Grey Peas, -- - - 473. 514. Sec6nds - - Ih
Beans, (old) - - - 554. 6'24.
• UXBRIDGE.
Coro-intpectoes Return.-Tau asp a:, Mates IL .1
•W heat, per 14041 tsl. to --s.
Barley; per quartzr 524. -d. to 454.
Oats
Beans *4oe. 44, to 504 e. -4.
Peas 504: '-;24.•t0• its. -4.
PKICL OF HOPS. •
NAOS. ' reciter!.
Kent, 41. 51:-:13-4. Kent, 41, Se le Ili 6,
Su.sev, 51. 104. to 41. • Is. Sowxy• 111. ak. p•
Essex, ()I. (Ai. to 01. 0.. faioltans,
SMITHFIELD-MARCH 15.
To sick the Oda', per Howell&
8eer....45. BJ. to 64. 041 I Head of Cattle W4ly:
Mutton ..4.. 341. to 64. US. Beasts
Veal ....54. 04. to 74. Od. I Sheep
Pork ....54. 01. to 74. 0.1. I Calves ... 9ll
Ltunb....o4. 041. to V. (U. rip)
HAY-MARKET.
Hay 4l. N. ltd.' to' 61. 10s. (M. -
Straw
•Clover
PRICES OF HAY AN9 STRAW VESTERDAT.
ST. JAKEIVS.
Hay, 41.0. od. to 61. 10s. Hay, 51. 54. to 814)it;
Straw, 21. 141..04. to 51.104. Clover, 61. 1%. tele. lb
Straw, VI. lbs. to IL b.
NEWGATE.ANI) LEADENHALL MARKETL

( ey the Carcase.)
Becf 4s. Od. to .ss. 4,1. Veal +l. Bd. to (.
Mutton 4g. Bd. to 51. I • Od. Pnrk Os. 4d. t• Ta $'
PRICE OF TALLOW, &c..
St. Jamil's Market —Os Od Tows Talkie, nia P
('lire Market 4s 6d Yellow
Wiiitechapel Market 4s' 64 I Whitt .. ?AMMON
per st. of 81b. • Soap ditto *OM*
9s 04 Meiriag 3iut.. MI
Average • 4. 64 Dittos's/14h
Graves
(Waal amp
Yelinw Sealy 93.+--Mottled. ishis —Pieces, 9es
11-2a—Castile 4:9. Os a ink 4M.
Price Candles, per dolen, 114 IM—Madlks
COAL aIAItKKT.
*hips sold. - PO'
115,

....................... 71711riC
1 Scotch
Ciuden... .4....... Y • 41w
The sympathy inherent in generous mines la
.
rendered every thing conuerted with gallant Ty.•
rolese an object of interest in this country. No
depeisilently of Oils feeling, however, IV; Alford,.
which has so often roused into action 'the pa-
triotism of-those hardy mountaineers, and lades
through fields of carnage to victory, raw, tidira
its iiitvinsic Merit, its melody, brilliancy, majaitlV
and science, prove an exqpisite treat Wo every prf•,'
sun of tissibical taste. We WU veuture to Malt
that its adoption to a. full band Of wind imbe+
.
racists, as announced by the Publisher in alloarf•
column of this Paper, will soon render it a, P 01111"...
lar here es almost any of our most admires,
marches.—No likeness of the gallant Dots
'BRUNSWICK has, tee believe, yet appeared lg.
country. It is, therefore, with pleasure WC ob-
serve, that.lllr. ActiaissListm intends to give, I
the neat Number of Tire Repository of Art', 41.
full length Portrait of that PRINCE. It cannot
fail to prove an accePtablo aidition to the ante.
resting account of his life, in a preceding number
of that Mork. •
—.roe

• 1 ..,„4/1E ff.
On the 19th' in-t..st-sio men in Stepften'i Green, Dahlia.
the Right H1P11..1 tom taw, 6.0. Lord Bishop of EOM*.
broinerofloo Lord
Mlitlashorouili.
efy at berfon, near Rosins, Lincolnshire. AS%
orihe Rev. Morin Sheath, a that piece, as°
eldest &lighter of the iate'Cramner Kenriellt E •

I
1.. •N 1)1/N s llrsiattnt nowt 11111,11..ted t.v. U. LAPP V 51.1.1 at lg.
SI A E II Al% ()F rick. Vii.VICCI-4trtet.
- - -

J