The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-05-10 00:00:00

~■

F

-I

~ d

no Member was totally Inaudible, and was once o
twice obliged to sit dot% n. He at length observed.
that though the Evidence given by the person who
byd lost left the Bar, afforded very little etiColifllgr•
sett to proceed in this Inquiry, yet be was deterteln-
advto nave Mr. Arrowstnith, of Johnson's-court,
Thoe.seeeet, Mr. Duckinore, of 2, Gough-square.
'oter, and Mr. Henry Cooper, called to the Bar
isrthwitb. s;
. After a few words across the Table,
' leers put by the SPEAKER, and carried unani-
iitally, that Mr. Arrows:lshii, Mr. Shackell, and
lir. Cooper, do attend at the Bar forthwith.
yitocreDDlOS OF TIIE COMMISSIONERS OF IN-
tauißY INTO ENGLISII COURTS OF JUSTICE.
die J. NEWPORT roar to bring forward his motion
ions this subject, but from the confusion caused by
embers standing ap, and quitting the House at the
eonclitsion of the last question. )1e was for a consider.
able time inaudible in the Gallery. The Right Hon.
Member proceeded to explain the circumstances which
woad him to bring Ibis question before the House,
and pointed out in strong terms the very great delay
which had taken place since the appaiutment of the
Commlssioners, which was in 1615. Those Com-'
rnissioners, five in number (two of whom were Mas-
ters in Chancery) had since their appointusent received
a salary of 121101. a year each, making in all a sum
of 30001. exclusive of allowances to Secretaries; and
other incidental espences. There was also an addi-
dotal sum doe this year of 6,000/. making in all
about 40,000/. The Commissioners had during that
nom made bat t oir Reports, two on the Court of
Chancery, and two on the Courts of King's Bench
aid Cunituon Pleas. With respect to the Reports on
the Court of Chancery, the Lord Chancellor, after
approving some of the recommendations, was of
*pion (after a tape of five years from the period
of the Report befog made), that it ought to undergo
the most grave and seriona inquiry. As to the Reports
of the Courts of King's Bench and Common Pleas,
the Chief Justices of those Courts had written to the
Secretary of State for the Dome Department, inform-
ing him that thoftports had never been submitted
to their consideration, or officially made known to
The excuse made by the Commissioners was.
that they experienced great delay and obstruction in
the different offices to übich their inquiries led them.
Ibis, he contended, was no excuse, for the Com-
missioners bad and ought to have exercised the power
of obliging the parties to produce the necessary
nents. The Honourable Baronet, allar some
tater observations, said, it was his intention to
OA a set of Resolutions in substance as follows :
—ell That it appeared from the returns laid before
the House, that five Commissioners had been ap-
pointed on the 9th of Feb. 1615, (in consequence of
as Address presented in July, 1614), to inquire into
English Courts of J n sti e That those Commissioners,
two of whom were Masters in Chancery, had received a
conpensation of 12001. a-year each from the period of
their appointment, amounting iu all to 30,000 f cello-
stet of allowances to St.erttaries .Ind other inciden!al ex-
penses--that, in addition to this, there was a further
charge of 6,000/. due this year, makiux altogether a
charge to the public of upwards of 40,000/." 'I he
Hoe. Baronet went on to state the stature of the other
Resolution?, namely, that the Commissioners had
made four Reports (specifying their dates), and that
the Lord Chancellor, after approving of certain re-
commendations relative to the Court of Chancery. had
(five years after the Report was made) declared the
Report required further consideration—'hat the Chief
Justices of the Court of King's Bench and Common
Pleas bad written to the Secretary of State for the
Home Department, slating that the Reports upon their
respective Courts had nut beets suloni:ted to, or made
officially known to them, nough the said Reports were
delivered by the Commissioners on the sth of Jan.
1919, and the 3d of July, 1619, into time office of the
Secretary of State for the II • Department. That this
House viewed with extreme .egret the slow progres.
of the Conentissioners, in an inquiry attended with such
a heavy expense to the pubic, which tlelay arose in
consequence of obstruction turown in their way by
certain public officers, whose deprtutents they found
it necessary to examine;.—and that, above all, the
House regretted and considered as highly censurable,
the manner in which the Reports upon the Court of
King's Bench and Common Plus had been withheld
from the consideration of the Chief Justices of those
Courts.
Ott the first Resolution being put,
The ATTORN EV-G EN ERA!, rose and defended
the Commissioners from the charge made against
them, and concluded by moving the previousquestion.
Mr. ABERCROM BY said that the gravamen of
time charge appleti to the conduce of the Government.
and a more serious ch..rge could not be well brought,
than that which was ahmitted. .1 he ll .cernment was
very faithful in distill ating the public money, but
ltopaias were taken to forward the reports to those
penes whose duty It was to uct upon therm.
Mr. B. H.t, t 11l RST th.fentled the conduct of the
Commissioners of time Inquiry. ile admitted that the
'Spence was considerable. hut was there any novelty
in that ?—(i ri aof hear, hear, and laughter!) With
respect to Ireland, there was good ground fur insti-
tuting an inquiry; t:tit the English inquiry by no
means justilieil t r e ; ence of the undertaking..
Mr. BARING sap, that it wouhl appear from what
had fallen from the other sic:e, that there was no
Person attached se. the Government to take cognisance
of the Reports in question. as it not the duty of
Government th;st t uhket .if that Commission was
carried lido execution t He regretted that his Right
Hon. Friend bat ever made his motion for the in-
quiry; it was now clear that no reform of
abuses of Courts of Justice would ever take place
where the officers of act*, Count were examined,
and where the result of their examination guided the
Commissioners. Having already expended a sum of
40.000/, in this hopelesb inquiry. it would be well if
the country were altogether relieved from se useless
aad so extravagant a species of Reform.
Mr. Serjeant NSLOW contended that the officers
of the Courts were, above all others, the pima' moat
Proper to have been examined.
Mr. WARNE denbul, tbat it was areetasty
Masters in Chancery on t,
'rho previous question
etch of the Resolutions.
OW which conveyed a
the Court of E
turn% and contained a

tt you
,s with
mom:
attests
oluxhif
with

low to
NA the
As the
ri pt Put
positer•
--tie

it %MI
r aftir
are re.
)aledgte
fog !sii"
pest."
Lb* 011 P
be B&W
ni 0f.%
ors

that ytto
letter °`
Min b".
ref Shiniii
I OW
It. W.°

rod
1101101.0,
. 4.

I

had neglected to lay the Reports before the Judges.
On this Mr. B. BATHURST moved a negative, and
the ilcu:e divided— •

AN.

For the Resolution, 56—Against it, 72—Majority
against it 16.
Upon our re-admission to the Gallery we found
Mr. JAMES presenting a petition from the Mer-
chants, Bankers, Traders, and other inhabitants of
the town of Carlisle, praying for Parliamentary Re-
form. The Honourable Member feared that if re•
trenchment and economy were not speedily substituted
for extravagance and waste, the Government would be
changed by violence.
Mr. CU RIVEN bore testimony to the respectability
of the signatures affixed to the petition.—Ordered to
he printed.
PARLIAMENTARY REFORM.
Lord J. RUSSELL said, that in rising to bring
forward the subject of which he had given notice, it
was impossible not to feel the manner in which a some-
what similar motion had been recently disposed of to
be a source of some discouragement. Yet the resolu-
tions which he intended to propose to the House,
would come from him with confidence of receiving a
very powerful support. If it was true that all Go-
vernments depended upon opinion, the Government of
this country must now depend upon most strict and
rigid opinion. The eyes of the whole country were
upon them, watching them with the glance of scrn-
tiny, and examining all their actions with microscopic
minuteness. And of all questions the most difficult'
for them to approach were those relating to the Con-
stitation ; because that most particulsrly attracted the
attention of the people to the manner in which those
who professed to be their Representatives guarded their
rights, and preserved their interests. The manner in
which he should bring this great Constitutional ques-
tion forsrard to-night, was not to inquire whether or
no they were the Representatives of the people, and
whether the opinions of the House did or did not coin-
cide with the opinions of the people. lie was not
going to inquire whether the minority of that House
were su;mported by time majority of the country, or the
majority of the House by the minority out of doors.
Yet, although he should not enter into these qnestions,
he retained his known principles anti couvietions upon
them. In principle he was a reformer, and what he*,
meant by that was, that he considered time House of
Commons as its name implied, ought to he the repre-
sentative of the people ; but as it was at present con-
stituted he believed it not to be so. His object would
now be to shev that such abuses anti innovations had
crept into it with time, that whether or not they al-
felled its resolutions and opinions at preset.t, they
must inevitably, at some future period, hose the effect
Of destroying it altogether. Amid if he could skew
this to he the cane, he called on the (louse to stop
these innovations without considering whethi r the v
had any influence upon its Lacs ost feeling or not,
to prevent the evils to which lie had alluded. The
first amongst these innovations were bribery and coo
ruption. He believed that there could nut be two
opinions in the House as to the existence of the prac-
tice of bribery to a very great extent. When he
brought forward a former measure, he stated that it
was at that time a common practice, and a matter of
every day's o,rlinary conversation. The Noble Lord
who was considered to be the leader of the majorities
of that House beard the statement and could not deny
it. It nas well known that in the county of Cornwall
this practice had takes) the deepest root. In that
county a regular system of what was called borough
patrunare WAS established, and must he productive of
the wor-o effects to the morals of the people as well as
to their constitutional rights. Another consequence
of time s)steni Hoist he, that time Executive Go-
vernment wools! Imecume corrupt and enfeebled by be-
ing obliged to conciliate time favour of these borough
Molders ur borough-patrons. The Government, lie
thou;ist, looked with greater anxiety fur time support
of Ilmormoig Ii Members than that of County Members.
Ira vote was sold like a quantity of wool. or like any
other commodity, the consequence must be felt in every
deparmru nt from the lowest to the highest. The No-
ble s ord then took au historical review of the several
laws fur preventiog corruption. Time first was the tri-
ennial Art, the preamble to which stated, that several
eo:up:Altos had been jos:ly made of undue Eire ions;
land it went on to enact, that any one giving money to
influence a return to Parliament should he punished.
the next was an Act passed in the reign of George
11. which annexed a certain punishment to time giving
or taking of a bribe. There was an exception in time
Act in favour of those who should detect their accous-
pliers, in conseqnence of whica it bad been known that
several persons who mere elected, in o der to save them-
selves prosecuted those whom they had h ibe I. Ile
considered that all boroughs in this situation were•in-
capable of exercising their franchise independently.
'ben a few i arsons of excessive poverty came in con-
tact with pets oms of excessive wealth, it was almost
Impossible to prevent corruption ; and if it was natal+
*us that a seat in that House could be purchased for
three. four or 7,000/. it became proper to catmint lie
tight of voting which secured it. Upon this sui,ject
he begged to refer the House to the case of the Ito-
rough of Stockbridge. In the year 1659, co rapt
practices were discovered in that Borougn ; but the
uebstes did not proceed to any great length. lo tie
year 103, a Resolution was passed sta ing that the
tttatu just then made had been influenced by corrup-
tion; and a Bill was brought in to disfranchipe the
Borough, and transfer the elective franchise to lia-
ffugstoke. The Bill was read a third time bet was
never passed. The next case to which he would teer
the Goose was that of the Borough of Aldboromiols ;
eorrtpt practices being discovered in that liorougo,
the Writ for a Member was suspended ; but aftereturds
On a penitential Petition from the town, if was rest(ztl.
Proceedings somewhat similar had taken plare4in
1696, with respect to Bishops Castle; and the (louse
would here observe that he had mentioned places
where it was suspected were even now not entirely
free from those practices. In the year 1701 mach in-
quiry took place respecting the conduct of one Shep-
herd, who lead attempted to bribe the &lectors of
**lobe, and lichester ; a Committee of Inquiry was
tappointeml.of which Sir Foltvaid Seymour was Chair-
Sen. Upoh the Report of the Committee, the House
'resolved that the charge against Shepherd wilt. est:4-
'460,4. Several persons were punished in 'wise-
Aid Shepherd himself was sent to the Tower
oceastott Sir Edward Seymour received 'the_
the Hulse tor' his zealous conduct its tilt
.tee, la the year 17611 s .use ioviry

place respecting the Borough 'of Ilindon, but upon
this he did not think it wai necessary for him
to enlarge. Now in the several eases of establish-
ed corruption, although he approved of the mea-
sures of 1771, relating to the cues of Shorehans,
Cricklade, and Aylesbury, and those lately %Wing
to Grampound, he thought those measures did not
effectually correct the evil ; fur at every General
Elee-
time fifty or sixty Boroughs were guilty of these prac-
lice,. The Act, called the Grenville Act did ant, he
thou; ht, afford any effectual remedy; for ti Act
enabled the parties complaining and complained of
to make up their differences, so that the House might
possibly be kept iu ignorance of many eases of gross
corruption. This was strongly exemplified in the
case of tiratopontul. Sir 31asseh Lopez haggled about
the price, and refused to pay the sum demanded for a
compromise; while others equally guilty with him
were content so purchase their safety, by adding to
their guilt. it was for this reason that he had inter-
fered in favour of Sir M. Lopez, who he thought, had
acted as be had, because it appeared to him justified
by etample. Upon this part of the subject he could
not say he was prepared with a distinct remedy: but
he should propose the appointment of a Committee to
consider it. The next part of the subject referred to
the extension of the right of voting. The objection
generally made to that extension was, that it innovated
upon the Constitution. This argument could not
possibly hold. Bribery itself, the grievance was an
innovation. The increase of large towns might be
called an innovation. Large Peace Establishments
Acre innovation' ; but they had been justified
on account of the increase of the manufacturing
districts.—(Hear, hear.)—lle therefore tweed nothing
that had not been already adopted in principle. He
wished conciliation to he adopted instead of coercion.l
lie conceived he had carried a great step, by carrying
the Bill for transferring the franchise from Grampound
to Leeds, because this transfer abolished the urgueletit
of virtual representation, and admitted that Leeds and
the other unrepresented towns had something to com-
plain of, and consequently something to gain. Ile
would shortly refer to the means by whirl*
there un
retires. nted towns were generally governed. Mate
(+ester, for instance, was only a part of Sall ; and
Sltiningliam was constitutionally but a village, and
neHlter of them had any municipality. '1 hey hail no
representation to lead their political opinion ; and they,
therefore, took those of the Hunt, or the I:niglit that
tirst of. red himself to their notice. Mom these dis-
tricts were in a state of irt itation, the person
sent to ally their discontents was Oiiver the
Spy. He was made their virtual Representative ;
the arbiter of peace or war. Some might probably
think that t xcitement of this nature was highly
or..per, and that measures of coercion were highly
a cessAry ; hut all measur4 s of coercion were use-
less. Multiplied punishments and large standing
armies only increased the discontent they were intended
Ito allay. Nothing remained to complete the present
measures of coercion but a Censorship on the press, and
he trusted they had yet strength enough left to resist
any attempt to impose on it. He implored the House to
try the effect of other measures, and to see whether
eoncilation would not ensure the respect and the love of
the people. The measure be should new propose was,
hr contended, strictly constitutional. Ile was not then
to defend the constitution of other countries, but to
shew that according to the English Constitution the
people had a right through that House to carry their
grievances to the Throne. As to the method of carrying
his proposal into effect lee would speak very shortly.—
The number of Members in that House was already
large enough, and hr therefore Ilia not propose any thing
which tronl.l lead to an increase of that number. His
plan went to displace some of the smaller Boroughs, but
not such of those as had their Charters for services,
unless gross corruption in those Boroughs was distinctly
proved. The question of compensation might be discussed
in a future stage of the proceeding. Ile was not unfriend-
ly to it ; and certainly there was a precedent fur it in the
artich s of the Irish Union, which provided a compen-
sation for the places which were deprived by the Union
of the right to send Members. He would now introduce
the general principle of the Resolutions he intended to
sulturit to the House. The basis of them was certainly
an extension of the elective franchise, a measure he
thought dictated alike by sound policy and by judg-
ment. The Noble Lord here referred to the ancient
state of Spain and Italy, to spew that a contracted fran-
diise endangered the Constitution, and depraved the
people. This was what he called upon the House to be-
ware of. The object of all Governments ought to be the
possession of the affection of the people, without which
no Onverntnent could exist in safety. The Government
asked the people to hear the burdens wOh safety, and
the House ought therefore to add another link to that
chain which bound the Crown, the A ristut racy, and the
Commons together. He was aware of the difficulty at-
tending this questien He knew some eoehl healarused
thinkirglie weans° far, and that others woahl ridicule
him thinking he had not gone far enough, hut as he rag
cootie-lone that lie was doing his duty, he pitied the for-
mer and despised the latter. The Noble Lord con-
cluded by moving four Resolutions. The first declared
that well-founded complaints bad been made to the
House of the practice of bribery and corruption in many
instatiees.connected with the return of Members to the
to the great scandal of that House, and contrary
to the spirit of the Constitution. The second declared,
that to strengthen the connection between the Commons
awl time people, it was expedient to give the right of
sending Members to certain large towns not at present
represented. The third was for the appointment of a
Committee to consider of the propriety of extending
the present elective franchise; and the fourth was
for a Committee to inquire into the mode of esturniag
Members in the Boroughs complained of.
Mr. WHITNIORE, in rising to second the motion of;
the Noble lord, assured the House that it was not his
intention to trespass much upon their att'entitifi.' He
was an enemy to Radical Mores, whether in' &Ship,
of Annual Parliaments aseiloitsesat Soltropil itt
that milder forum ef it illicit prepaid to give thireight :
of reties to inbanitaat betiosioltidoes, boons* is op..
peered to him to aim at list seta overthrow of 641,
stitution, which had raised this country top Soh of
glory unexampled ancield sea ntoderu:hi
Clue elements of " . - •

fabric of Radical Reform, that instead of tunesiie
any part of the suponttecture of the constitntiete. it
was calculated to throw the whole superstructure dove.
While he objected to Radical Reform, because it won id
tend to make that Houie purely and entirely droners.
tical, lie was a friend however to a moderate aid
tional Reform, and he supported the resolutions of the
Noble Lord, because he thought they were calculated
to attain that object; end diat his plan would be found
capable of a safe and easpiliocutios.
The SPEAKER having the hit Reeolntion;
there was a toed try of si Strange ;s withdraw;" and
the tiallery was sourly cleared for a division, whoa
Mr. B. BATHURST rose, and spoke against the
motion at considerable length, but from the noise which
prevailed in the House, and the low tone of voice in
which the Hon. Member spoke, we were unable to collect
any of his observations. lie concluded with moving
the previous question.
Mr. BARIUM expressed himself in favour of the
original motion, and defended the character of the
Borough of Stockbridge, which be described to be as
free from corruption at present as any Borough or
County in England.
The House then divided, as follows:—
For the original motion 124—For the previous (pm-
tion 135—Majority 31.
The other Orders of the Day were then disposed of,
and the House adjourned at two o'clock this morning.

311NORITY
OT FITTT-SIN. FOR SIR J. NRWPORT.

Lord Althor,l, lion. G. B'nnet, R. Bernal, J. Hirelt,
Sir F. Blake, J. li. B.trhatu, ern., T. Barrett, J Cart. r,
Sir W. Cirspigny, J. C. Cutwen, Coloraft, 1. Coneati •
nnn. N. Colimn. Col. Ilavire, Lord Ebrington, Lissa
Folkestone, B. tioskel, It. tionlon, P. Orenfell, Sir tit.
' tinier, .1. C. linithottse, lion. J. Bowe, lion.(.'.
tintrhin-
ann. W.James, Sir J. Nlarkititoalt. J.Maberir, J. Martin,
.1. B. Monek, l.ord Milton, M. Ntilhank, Sir J. Newport,
W. Newman, W. Ortle, J. O'(:allaghan, C. F. Painte,,
G. Phillip*, T. Parr*, Lord W. Russell, Lord J. Puese,),
,C. Ittintholl S. Rice, W. Smith, J. Smith, J. Smyr`s,
I Lora J. Stewart, J. Stetr,rt, night lion. O. 'Elem.-,
Niarquis Taristork, Al 1. Wood, W. Wrwill, Sir K.
con, J. A. IV:urn, C. W. Wynn, W. li. Whitbread,.
Williatna.
TELLEne—A. Raring, J. Macdonald.

It appears by letters of the 10th March, received
recently fr Perottnlnten, that the proeeedin fat
which took place there an the 6th were not decidedly cr
a revolutionary charaatt The arrival of a vi 1.0
from Bahia, with the intelligence of a change that Ind
been effected in that city, led to the immediate ascent.
Ming, in the manner before stated, of all Ow cit.'',
military, and ecclesiastical superiors, to delil.erate on
the a.•eption of a simi;ar proceeding; but their de:i•
10-ration led only to the inure moderate expedient of i's
aildrets to the hing, praying him to accord to the in -
habit:Lan; of Perthintlinto that furtn of constitution
whi, h should receive the sanction of the Cortes of Po-
toga), with such ineilitications as should render it with
propriety applicable to the people of Brazil.
EMUS AN i A Ti) A retes.—A person in the neigh-
bourhood Of Cove received on Sunday last a lett r 41
from his son (pia Plymouth, who sailed with Mr. Par-
ker for the Cape of Good !lope. The writer give.;
nowt melancholy account of that expedition: be state,
that on their arrival, they found the settlement des-
tined for them to he a portion of land which had been
aband med by a Dutch tiserchant, and so barren and
wild that any attempt to cultivate or reclaim it would
be utterly hopeles.. lie says that most of the ;nen
who accompanied Mr. Parker from this had deserted
him, and that Mr. Ingram's men had conducted them-
selves leery badly. Mr. Parker, the writer states, ii
about to e home to represent his grievances. and
to try and procure redress and indemnification for the
expenses he has incurred in this fruitless expedition.
.--(f!ork Ahreamtilo. (Vironerle.)
FES! tLE ',Mu:Plot rv.—Sunday, during the absence
of the family, the house of Mr. Watkins, Back-strew,
Ilurslydoo ii, was entered by four ruffians, by means el
pickloi k keys, who broke open a room and stole bank-
notes, gold and silver coins, watches, plate. te.c. worth in
the whole about 200/. Baying carefully packed up their
booty they descended to the yard, intending to escape
over some hack premises, but were observed by a young
woman, names) Sarah Cleare, servant to Mr. Parke-,
bricklayer, adjoining, who challenged them. The men
paid no attention, but jumped into the garden in which
she was standing, and attempted to rush past her into a
shed through which their passage lay; she, however,
seized two of them by the throats, and called for help,
but they broke away and knocked her down.—She pur-
sued tin m again, came up with the fellow who carried
the plunder, and grasped him by the collar; he made a
violent endeavour to get loose, and kicked and thumped
the plot wonian niost brutally, but she held him. net-
stitlistainlinz, till Mr. Harvey, the parish constant,
came to her itssistance, and lodged the fellow in St.
John's wateblionse. The prisoner underwent an exami-
nation yesterday before Alderman J. J. Smith, and was
fully rommitte.i, •
Et.niaMENT.—Tuesdav night the aeightourhood
of the Angel Inn, St. Clement's, was a scene of much
confusion fur a few minutes, owing to the following cir-
cumstance :—About nine o'clock, and a short time after
the arrival of the Salisbury stage coach, a post-chaiSe-.
with four horses and two postillions, drove like light-
ning into the inn-yard, and next minute, a middle-aged
lath., dressed in a funeral travelling pelisse, and a young
gentleman wrapped in a fashionable roinelaire, sprung
i from the same, and enquired very earnestly. if a young
gentleman and lady hail arrived there by the coach from
Salisbury ? The driver, front the description, was ter•
twin the parties were the same who left the coach i%
Piccadilly is a hackney chariot ; and on this intelligent*
the lady and the gentleman (who was her Ms,) immedi-
arch. set off to Bow-street, to request the assistance of
the"Magistricy. It appears the young fuglilves are'
scarcely of age; the gentleman is All stiventnoests son of
Mars, and the lady the youngest of a most distiOgoisbed
tastily near Salisbury, and will be entitled is an Ina-.
2111
*tense fortune when she comes of age. The Mowery
glace in consequence of a letter fooled on tbatollet
Ong lady two hours after her. departure t The.
. iii lest no time in following ;loft AIMS they
iravetled at the extraordinaryfa& of IS milli how.
bto came came to town first. At nine o'clock gesiamlar.
orning the police had gained some scent sad . *fk. immedt-
-4 at
ly set oft in permit et tbe f+tieel.
, Smoestme Sous aa.—A tienessas, who bidlbhoda IS
wears a confidential clerk in the basking bap 1. it Sir,
Jamei Waite and Co. cOmmitted • +Weide oti.Tneivieadg
by ma
morning gas his throat with * razor. •Rr
t be committed the act before a kroisiteg *OS lei

~ ~ T

4¢

lily ‘04.1M“.•••••••%••••
was Plat allsi neratkitl. is klishel.
*Wiest a -41ketsion, lOW titner.• afs
censors os Ole 4'l" this
witbbeidlag Ot dits of
ceusare oa fita oilebift MID Cauutattivi

'exampled in aneleai sod e"nodern:hi t,iry teithatiseewmasitied the act bon., 6 46611611. Own p.m'
euu of insecurity were so mixed up %itli ihr l his bed.
•