The Statesman.
London, England, 1819-03-29 00:00:00

Public might rejoice that a triumph Lad been achiered
without puidre ereet.ce. Yet be was much afraid
that that pat. inti.:.l 5...01.1 nut be quite et.e....esfol
the presrnt case ; f:.r note!astatohng all that had
dr-en raid about a mates house being his castle, mill%
.'her obierrstions of the tame kind, and 50 peculi-
arly adapted to rotas.* the feelings of people in this
country, it would be found that the order in neestiroo
proceeded upon Frinciples on which the C..urt was
in the constant hahit of acting. Though there
had not b. en precisely the same case, yet the
ramie epeeies facii occurred in many instances.—
Fur instance: tbe Common Law gave a person a
right to walk (tier a man's land to see his tithe.
and to be sitisfied that it was properly set out,
as well might it be said—What a strange COlOOlOO
lA* ; to permit a Parson to commit • trespass with
impsnity, lithe law Rase him the right to a thing, it
gave bias the right of sseettaining what he had : sup-
pose the stela of a diamond merchant purchased for
him 100,0C.01.'s worth of diamonds, for which he use
to biro per rent. ; and •fterwards, when be de-
manded his premium, the merchant insisted they arm
only worth 7.4.:0U1., and • bill was tiled In the
Court of Chancery ott the sotject, wodtd not the
Court oblige the jeweller to produce the di.oroods
In all cases where ex Necessitate justice could not he
done without an inspection, the Court 'meld order
it. You could not bring a house er • warehouse to-
to the Court of Chancery as you could diamonds,
*tines, or statues ; and therefore. es the Court
could not see the thing ipsis ecritis, it was, of neces-
sity that it should appoint an adout to inspect. It
was true that no order bad ever been made in the
Court similar to the present; but neither the novelty
nor singularity of the case constituted an sdeguateer.
gement against the jurisdiction of the Court. After
a my able speech on the jurisdiction of the Court,
as proved by I Acts of Parllasnent, the ',rented
Cocottel concluded by impressing his decided convic-
tion that the order would be confirmed.

Mr. Num% followed eo the same side ; he ellen-
tinned the case of Lord Liverpool ■nd the Prineeve
of Wales, whets the Corti Mad ordered the lespec-
(ion of a bowl, alleged to hoer been forged.

T. SOLiCITOK•CFVEILM. geode an animated re-
ply, and contended that he wet mill jaMilied in
maintaiaina„ es he had, when he began, that tin mien
IlldPi Si that made by Mot Vier-Cbe neellur had ever
been laseed by the Court, anti he was sure would net
new lie boned.

The loan Ctt,txcet tort ()Nerved, that as to rho
question, what the Court would do if it had jeris.tic.
troll, he had no doubt upon that point. Ile thought
the real question to be considered would be, whether
when the Legislature gage tr. J. in the pound on
the rent or vale, of • man's hou3e, it had not at the
same time made a contract between the parties which
they r 'snood to carry into eflert. On accoont
of t:-• treat importance of the case, and its being an
appeal from the Judgment of the Vire-Chancellor,
he should take • few hours In con,i,le, of it, and
would decide it on coming into Court on Tuesday
morning. Ile should, in the mean time, look into
all the Act! of Perihelia:rot on the subject, in order
to come to • proper conclasion.—The Court Wei
clouded to tactic