The Statesman.
London, England, 1822-01-30 00:00:00

NOIiDINa Jain.

a RRRRR rrnw SERIN* 'MAT /EMIT PT lITAISCIIOSU
VAT FM 11121111 DAT Mr R saes. •
1,400011.0 Os NIS VOX WOILST 1"111160 108
UIS COUPA/411. •
Who ever Jarvy—wait.
That was es/ %Utter ew his—seat
Tell ee.*Woes. what %is teach.
The needle ep—eptet--e b*.r,
•
Rutted in Ike atel-eley sir.
More this if is—• wid-eiyA!.—abeir?
You'll say..." weevy. —locY Pei",
Nat with as •:•ese* of--brala
For Jerry ef—or street or-4044.
Did aerereerry awed a lead;
AN I my veneers farther still.
Te say Ise Jerzy—eser
Vor wee of saute have too ureh
To driee—aed are too poor to— . S.

LAW INTRLLIORNCS.
-.um.-

COURT OF CHANCERY, J. ft.
canyeam Or CONIT.--DRZWE C. !BOUM.
Mt. SMADWiLL stated, this was an application rola-
tire to an infant female ward of the Court, who bad
beet clandestinely married. It appeared that Mlsa
Drew!, the infant. k only 18 years of age, and resided
with her aunt sad testamentary guardian. Mrs. Bye-
.field, of Old Compternmqrst. ffnhomeleare. since De-
member. 1820; before Hurt she was at Mite Grimm's
Ainerdieg-schoel. Blackhealli. On the morale, of the
•ftrb of the present month. the infant left Mrs. Bye-
11's
boas* before say of the family were up, and
%idiom their knowledge. Every inquiry and ,peareli
were made after her on that day. On the fellewlog
day Mrs. Byeileid, being apprehensive that she had
eloped for the purpose of getting martini. caused no-
tires to be served at the different churches is her
neighbourhood, forbidding it. Os • the same day,
Mrs. Byelield's husband received the following note,
without ,a signature:--
" Son,—Feariag that as secielental circumstance
should have preveimed the delivery of a note from year
niece on yourself or Mrs. 8.. I beg to assure your that
she Is in perfect health and spirits, and that you may
expect to mew hear from her es Wednesday or There-
day seat. pad tree( that matters will prove satisfy Cory
to all parties."
On Wedaesday. the 23d. a Mrs. Turner called on
Mrs. Eyelid'', sad 'stemmed her that Ilse infant was
- married to her sea, William Turner, of Cullam.street,
Feaphareb-street, ima the Sunday she had eloped. hut
refehml give her any satisfactory answer as to the
•._.

eisarch.thei wen married la. She did sot daisy thb
abs sad her family knew that the West sae a ward
of Cain, Sad acknowledged that her eon, Jelin Tur-
ner.. amisitor gread-daughter. Bileabeth Turner, were
privy and &alined is the nsarriage.of the infant with
William Tusk. What be (the Leareed Cosine!)
therefore had to oak of hie Lordship was, that ►
wonli order Mee. Terser, ber two eons, and Ist
resod-daughter to salmi is Coon to answer the tor
tempt. •
-The Lord Cisiten‘unte—.' Let them attend me
. tea o'clock on Friday merging."
COW & OF KIM* BENCH, Tommy. Jas.*.

This beteg Spintal Paper Day, the Court heard
gamins apes fieeteed eases.
eat 111. TINT.
Tide was asrmille, of emillderable importance
the Commercial parreff lb/ public. It was an action
on a bill of embargo of large amount, drawn by a
person Bused Roanb,- endorsed by the plaintiff, ac-
cepted by the defendant. and wade payable at the
house of Roberts, Canis, sad Co. After the bill
reached the plaintiff. It warput late s be: at the bogie
of Roberts and Co. Three days before the usual time
of delivery. the bill was returned to the plaintiff with
the acceptance erased. No cause was assigned for the
erasure. The defendant, soon after the bill got to
Roberts and Co.'s, revolied his acceptasee.
The Jury footed a wersiilt for the pialatilL and the
question whether the plaintiff was entitled le lam**
recover, was reserved for the consideration of the Coact.
Mr. Curry thig day argued the case in behalf if
Isle plaintiff, and contended, that his client was entitled'
to recover, .se. aptqcst bill 'regularly accepted. 'l'4'
Learned Counsel 4ed I cases, as well as the
opinion of the Judgim, to prove that an acceptance to
a bill of exchaage ow/ given, could not be revoked.
In foreign laws releting to commerce, and more paw
ticalarly in the Hamburgh Ordinasces, be found that
principle recognised. In the Lid Commerciale. writ.'
ten by a celebrated and able foreign writer (Fortier),
Mr. Chitty discovered that an acceptance could not be
ievoked Without the consent of the drawer.
Judge BreT. at this part of the argument, observed,
that the paragraph following the words cited by Mr.
elsitty from La Loi Commereiok of Pottier. stated
that an acceptor was entitled to do away his accept-
*ore by protest before the bill was put in circulation.
The doctrine of Fortier, and the Ordiassees of Ham-
Leigh, were agalest the ;upwind of till
ilgisnold
!edge Rarity 14111 d the question was; witeihipe the
acceptance was abandoned berme the final delivery.
Mr. Diromatt rose to address the Court on the other
side. gat the Lerd Chief Justice said they should not
*reel& him.
The Court the. delivered opinion. seriatim, that
the defendant was entitled to a verdict. Upon all the
authorities it wee competent for a person after givieg
his acceptance, to erase his name before the bill is
filially delivered. No prejetlice could arise from the
revocation at such' it time; the defendant wes entitled
to thejedgment of the Clam
Verdict set aside.
JONSSON r. lIIIILIT "lee n,
This was an action against the elefeeninata, wbe ens
members of the Yeomanry cavalry, few drehMilt
the Manchester Meeting. - • ,n
Mr. LITTLEPALZ moved on behalf Of the defend-
ants for a rule calling on the plaiirfiff to furnish the
attorney for the defendants with a description of his
picee of abode.

Th. motion was =elation ailikvits, swearing that
enquiry had been made to. obtain information respect-
ing the residence of Johnson, and no information
could be übtaised. ••

1 he Gantt granted a rnle to show canoe.
The applieatioe was Lads with a view to security for
test..

ItOCIITT POR me et: Or RCSSION or VIM.

ten 1180 In Gnomon CLARK, 0711nSWISS JOHN JOKES.
Mr. 0. NAISTATT SOlreci to quash the plea psi' in
by tise defendant to the indictment preferteJ against