The Statesman.
London, England, 1820-10-06 00:00:00

IMP E lc! L P. 1.1 L 1.131 E-Yr

1101J811 Ol' I.OIIDS. IYLDNUDAt, Oct. 4.

LE,FEN-1,7E OF rfriE .QUNEN.
(Coutiaue4 fruss the Ph* 11Jitillisf'yesterda)'s Va!erstaie.)

lord Gary rose to int a few remarks on some ob-
servations that had faller.; from the Counsel for the
Queen. lie onside ell it mow material to learn, whe-
ther they (the Counsel) were prepared to proiltire
proofs in support of these asserNune, respecting the
interference of Government. He then referred their
Lordships to the ei idetwe of Barbara Krantz. whoswore
that she was compelled. most involuistarilv to come to
England by the Austrian Goverumelit, while it ap-
peared that influence had been exercised by the same
government, to prevent witnesses coming who could
speak to her character. If such a foul arid odious in-
terference had been exercised, he did Not what
course might be pursued in other Courts of Justiee,
but he thought that it would be quite militarist grounds
fur their Lordships to put an end at once to a primped.
which had neither the appearalice of hew or jus-
tice. These observations he made as a Juilf:e, sitting
there to do ;voice, and he hoped their Lordships
%vault nut consi.ter it nemeses- to move thrit the Coun-
sel be called upon to know whether prairies could be
adduced in support eff their at sertioto, and if so, that
they lie directed to proreed.—(.llear. hear!)
Lard Li v carom. perfectly avrced with the Noble
Lord, that if such an interfered:e did take place, it
was most unjust. But he felt it a duty he owed him-
self, a duty he owed his Slajcsty•s tiovernment, aed
par:4'll4l.ly that part of the curer% ntent. (the Secrm
tart' of State for foreign Mairs), to mention, that it
was their retire disposition to *GO precisely the
same facilities to one as the other. Mill hr would 31)-
petal to two Honourabl.; Gentlemen, f. r. Ltishiugton
and Mr. Virar.l. Fur dot• were the (evade:lieu tt ho
principally had the cotuniutsication, whether they did
mot give this aiLaratice on the Oates* t and chat 110001
of all the iustructions t.; foreign states had horn sh-wn
to them, and he believe.l, delivered to them, and were
.11,0 told that should they appoint any agent to conduct
the affairs 1.1 her Jlajesty, that every facility slewbl be
afforded them —(llear, irear;) And 'lie :sc.-tired the
Muse, that, hail the Leiersed Conuml for tl.e Queen.
w'oen V•ey met these ts-trarleo, applied to the other of
the Se..refary of State fir Foreign Affairs, that those
obstacles would be removed as sell a' they 1.00.1. Itit's
respect to the individual in question (fleurral Pimp) lie
braes; to aisure the llousr that he belie% ed his absence
freanthe trial proceeded entirely frosts own.clioice,and
that it was time custom of fir.l,trei stases not to suttee any
iofficers to appear in their uniform in other countries,
'lest any disgrace or insole should he indicted on tbat uni-
form. Ile coot-boleti by clying. that if the Counsel world
furnish him with the name of.any peromi they wished
to hate brought over. be plittlzell liiimodf that in two
lour* steps would be taken to that effect.—(dear,
hear.)
The Duke of WELLIX6TON rose, fur the puerto, of
!whiting that the Noble Lord, who bad just sat down, was !
thy accurate with respect to the nudism of Foreign '
They had a strung objection against suffering
any Officer from appearing in their uniform in a foreign
country, lest au insult might lee offered 014 wearing
that anifortn.
The Lono Cn iNCMLI.OIt stated to the Ciretteet that it
Was the wish of the Ilimse, to know whet'aer they were
prepared with proofs iu support of Ilse **radium, just
now made.
Mr. Moralism did ant imagine thlt he should lo
soon be called on to !motiore his witnesses, particularly
as it was out of the coarse, which It r and his learned
colleagues had thought fit to adopt. Ile stated that
many of the witnesses yet to be produeed, were still at
Milan. But thus he lead some nettws who could be
railed to speak to some of those Lief% whith occupied
the', landslip's attention. Ile said that although they
had received an assnrance from the government of
facilitating their endeavours its the ;left-lire, it Jul not
seem prudent to them 10 acquaint the government, who
were the prosecutors, with tue Line of defence ie•endeil
to he pursued.
. The LoRD I !lIIKIT.LI.OR thought it ftlhOillti he left quite
at the disrrrtiuu of the Counsel to preivr,..clo th..ir att.
fetter In any or;ler they thought propel:. Ile could nut
agree with the Noble Lord (Grey) that nut eircainstances
that have arisen shoal.' bare the elc.xt of putting a atop
so doe proceediees in the present stage.
Lord OBEY explained.
Lord Dosocotimoar tilonght that their Lordships
ought not to pass Over the charge Which lied been
!brought against his Majesty Government by time Cows-
eel at die liar: The ;detesterst went at fat tvi to say.
that witoemire had been comprited y die execative
power to come in support of this Itilt, and "that COOP
'poision had been used by foreign. vowel's unrelisted by
.:or owls liosernment to prevent witnesses from ediniag.
ff this was not the intended
.10 he conveyed.he did nut understand words and goestitres whirls tyre
the most sittnificant. Thee was notch of initausmatioa
and there hail been notch of misreptesentidon II dds
affair, and he hoped their Lordships would resist moll
Conduct bglimiar. It hail. gsme• too far ohmic. if the
Queen wanted n itn whir. (salt wile it 'ller Ma-
jelity's Counsel had nut made Ant • applikation whirls
about could ensure them the 'artraitani‘e of those wit-.
trammel. The Noble Lord la co:win/ion i.„(wptislentf.4.l
, his Ma)corY'irtiocernment OA the' liberal conduct they
'had he towards the Counsel onerehep Matrsty. ...
!Ant IL.mcsatu defended 'the lintniwat saeerw4
Ormond. and contoodad that bit Nitiflifitem4 1
of DitnottgliumreS was not Iteerf‘ftty cutisist air selen hey
-omplaintsl ..of di rot. • The I „.ike•Vp Voltues.l
plaited. that the asm of poise? /dal: tet740.1./ Oita'

.6., . -

Yips.
••••••

„r. '
• 72126104
-- • Mar. ►.--

Dues your lowttvliip recollect when ?—ln the bilk-
ning of March 11115.
Do von knew who composed the suite of her Mnje‘ty
at !fiat time?-1 reMember the Hon. Kew! Craven, S:r
William Hen, Dr. Holland, her pllysmian----I catinot
remember all.

Do you rreoUect teeing at that time. Bergen's' ?—I do.
Do you know in what situation he wasl.--As tar as
understood he %CP% reader.
Dow long did you remain there ?-only three or fort

days.
Was Lady Charlotte Lindsay there selilst you were ?
—She cau:;! after I left Naples.
Where did you nest ere her Majesty ?—At home.
Was that lung Art you saw her .t Naples . —Three
or four days tr:ly. •
line long did you remain at Rome with her Majesty/
—A very abort time, two or three da)..
Did von dineswith her there :--At Rome I did Co',
I think, but I did at Naples.
Who dined there witb you'—There was a larg, 2a:
I du not recollect all.

Was WI Charlotte hinslsly pre.e!it 7.—She was.
Was Madame Falconet ?—I Iseli..ve so; but 1 "rums:
recollect the particular I...rsons now.
After her Maiestv left Rome, where nest did vMx
Lordship see the Queen is—At Ciretta Vecchia. 1 Lr
tiered she emharktd there for (hem

Were you there at the time, my Lord ?—Yes; deem-
barheil tro:u Circ.ltu Vecchio for (11,410 a.

!low lone did her 51ajei.iy slay ciertra Vecehi%
fore she cinh4rLei:?-1 think ;quint 5 or 6 days.

Did dour Lordship and Lady Charlotte Lititisay (Gine
1 parr of her Maiestj 'a party dttrit:c her stay at Ci%etta
Vecchia ?—Yes; wr dwelt in the same house.
And of course at the same tattle :;---Every illy, a:trap.
Was any body else there, my Lord t—Y •s : I t'Attic
the Margolis de Maims. who was the master the bona 4
which her Majesty was. dined there sometimes, and
some of his family I.believe.
IVrer those person 3 whit formed her Majesty's tsit,..e.
Naplei iliere7--Yes, with the exception of Vt. liu:.a t.
Was 31allatne Falconet there ?-- Yea.

And her two daughters?—Yes.
01 what age, my Lord, were these voting ladles)--I
uue of them It as about Li or *hi, and the wk.!:
a little younger.
Did emir Lordship know Madame Faleonet before. -
Yes, I had seen bet before,
Who was she?—She was the wife of a banker a..
Naples. I nndersteod she was either an English o: al
American lady. _

Is :.er husband a person of a considerable line of In •
siness ?—Very considerable.
Did &ladaine Fale•met associate hith persons of t::
first rank in Naples?—l believe she did in the tint n.“ •
cant& circles, but I really cannot say.
Was she not also it: the lire rank of the ?•..'
really cannot say. I lteliev; su. 1 was !hens tern
time in Naples.
Did her dangh!ers also associate arnong.personiji
the first rank ?—I believe su ; she had one dauglit••
Tarried, as I underroorlf ret a French gentleman t;
rank. and another to an American gentleman.
Were these the anu ladies grim acre with the Quer:. '
—No ; two other daughters, I believe.
Did the latlies your Lordship mention dine at
Majesty's table at i:iietta Vecchia'?—Yes, they did.
When the Queen embarked, w.:s it on board fl•e
Cloritkle ?--Yes, it was.
Did your Lordship aid Lady Charlotte Lindsay thsr.
embark with her Majesty on board the Cluritide
Who else then fome.ed her Majesty's suite'?--Ma
Falconet, her two daughters, and l'r Holland.
Where did your Lordship and Lady C. Lindsay di.
embark ?—At Leghorn.
%Vhett did your Lordship see her Majesty after that
period''—.l long interval elapsed before I saw the Qnr,
aLain. The next time I met her was, I think, in Nona, -
her, lekls. at the Villa d'Este, her Louse near the Lal, •
of Com
Was }um, Lordship then acrompanied by La ly Char
lotte Lindsay?—No, I waX nut.
Where nas Lady Vliarlotte then ?—She Ira, in En. •
Vont- Lordcliip has s•:il that you then saw the 4114.. i
at the Villa d'Este ?—l'es, 1 first saw her Maj.sty un tt.e
Lake. •
Did yon dine at the Villa tl-en?—Yes, I aids
Was Hergaini then at her Majesty's table ?—He was..
Did your Lordship ever before see hint sit at the tab*
with, her Majesty:—Never, I think.
Did your Lordship stay longer than that day at t4a.
Villa &Ede P—\o, 1 went as ay the • ante eienins
%, here ili•I your Lordship en slept that ttirlit hi
the little town of t'aniu, And went on the nett (la)
.14
31ilan.
Did your Lordship see the Quern afteterat.l.?—sYes,'
I saw ...le Quern on the Saturday or Sunday l'olloring• at
Milan, where I slinell with her he an invitation which .1
received when I was at the•Villairßoe.
After R mmm e, wht.re did yon see her nest?—At Civetti ,
I'iVol{3, as here %le. einharoed fur lietuKA.
hid ..m 1;116 in the bAtsse Itiutse with, bet Maj-,ty ? - I
'tined at tattle with her their.

The (HMO CHANCELLOR .1141, that hefore hp aldcp,t :he
.Ittorney.tleiteral to proi-ee•l nith ativ yot—tioti, h. h
to alothigi‘o to the hoo4e for not iniurtitinc them, %Owe,
the Noble Earl ot.t ..torn, that it till. u.ual %then r
Iraq sworn. to reoive their Lor4ships' prr.nis-ion tu.4s-
prnar with kAwitor question, pot throngli their .
.sad In ang7;r:e.:o adopt the miner coovruirot rya: •,.1"
thrir keine put hi. 4:o•intel in the togal c0nt.....
tit beg their Lirr•iiiiire pardon tot no: brtuaiiy po:t,or.
tpiediuo, that they should sligporme, with the tti
forio.
The .171-01RNF.V tbea procrearii to rriervet•
iiesi;ne the Karl of liailfuri. •
• Your Lordship hat .Coati whet yrei were at that •
Hrrtattiessitoatiow with the Qatli. era. that tit "z.v •
?—Ves.
Did it happen to your lair.l.hlp to see. artiqe •
pie., a: Rufus., air at Orfila Vrrehia, M hether Lt 4 *tie.:
waited twain the tomploY.at tattle .shushrealvi•t
at Novi,. wtiel.hrt hr (tilt or au:, bat 1 :Oink tie
t..iretta

1

t

t•

I

- 1
I

v;•Tr.

1-

!

1

.~
~,

•
P atiable'oulioilti CA:44 !•-:•-•1
ro04:141!!.;"'. • ' •
11 liaridowation -did Ludy Charlotte Lindsay hold is
11 {4uell!L talabliolusweL•T—Slis-wis lady of the heti-
cl,ra!Llgr. „
At OW 41.1 •Ilee leave kftp serriei?-1 think in
t! e. mouth of.Nai JAIL . . "
you
.seell;el.'onntesi 'Mt at gist thsei—Yes.
Vid you freVently converse Itb her?-Not fre-
quently.
1/ sante litureage did she speak ?—She spoke good
1 t:.;:an. with somewhat of air accent.
11.14 ycins Lordship a Cheek servant at that tine?-
1 tg.
Did her Majesty Skew yon her garden
Did any thing pattio tilar occur at that time ?-
I%ctit;tig that I recollect.

Dld you wall: ride —ller Niaje‘ty lent me bet
der key.

hors pm Lordship rrrollert at ‘clrit part of ►he far-
r•n our Lordship I lard her 31:ije4ty'g donkey :
fir did not recollect

Dist tutw Lordship e'er see your servant walk in these
grounds?-1 do not remember.
Did tnOy Lordship ever see your servant walk with
tl:r Princess in these zriiiinils:'—l'ertainly not.
DM yore Lordship ever hear that she walked with
your servant in these grounds ":-1 do not think I did.
Ltd yint ever state to any one that you saw your we-
wart walk with her Royal Iligliness in these grounds ?
Certsialr tint.

Does.your Lordship recollect a zrotto there ?—Yes
the Priarem showed me a grotto, I remember.
Ltoes moor Lordship recollect your ser%ant being
there ?—',No I do not.

Bid roe iLordship never state you slur him there .-
4:ertsiily not. I never said 21., for I reeolle t nothillg
particular that could ba it on III) mind.
Your Lordship mitht bare seen him might have
seen Mtn. but I do sot molten it.

Iv you; Lordship fond of riding —Not 3 rticolarlv.
Was it the request of her Royal Highness that intluivd
you to ride her donkey?-1. es.
Did you ride over the grounds attached to the
Villa DtEstc Certainly, I
have p:as•ed over
0. le VIM nd S. _

Were.yon 'attemle,l br yrotar .grant on any one of
t`, a•r orrasions ?---Yes, sometimes.

How lung did that per•.m afterwards remain in your
service 1—.4 think hr left me •t Venice in the cuurse
of theyear 1917.

Hid ton ever 'any renters Ilion with your sister
Lady Charlotte !Amboy on the subjeet of her remaining
in attendance on her floral Highneis :—Yeq, I recut•
feet to Lave had some correspondence with her on the
bid you recommend to Lally Charlotte Lindsay the
pr .ptiety of resigning the situation Mich she held
a:IJUt Ilse person cf her Ilu)al Highness did ad-
bey to resign it.

Illot_were the cowl termini's which induced you to
frire•thet advice ?
Mr. 11111,11'1.:14M here desired to remin:l their Lord-
skt.i.; that tlis (1'34 a question addressed to points In
sr; i.h hr had keen res•rained from entering.
The I.urd txt 'Lima agreed with the Learned
that the wa., taking an Jerry'.
lar course, and it 'night indeed he advisable to ex-
purge the preceding question and answer.
Mr. Canvey was then directed to oblitersite the pas-
sire froso his ewes.

1R red by Mr. Tex DALE —flocs your Lordslair
reeoliget Ise sire of the garden ?—Nu.
Did you vier see any impropriety in the conduct of
t 1 e Prince“ ?

l'hp•AgAnswgv-Ormtn.i objectakto this question.
TINDALL.-1 bare nothing more to ask.
Loral Roca-z-Wlien the Noble Lord saw the Princess
r the like of Como, 0":01 any person with her?—Yee,
Ber
15. there any other person in the Loaf ?—(We under-
-100,4 the atutrvr to IOC) No.
lord Gars.—At any time when in the company of
bur Royal flightless with Bergalsii, 'III you ever see
s"c illOptOpfkly of COIIIIOII Of fillbillAtity between
t' 7 --No.'
°or Lordship havini stated that the Countess Oltll
s7..iie-good Italian, with a slight accent of Lombardy,
d..f yon observe any thing remarkable in the Lady
d•• 1 not observe any thing very remarkable.
Di 4 your Lordship ever observe any thing particular
it the -mixes of her Royal Highness f—ller usannrrn
ePritierftetlit noodrxi, inoyilyire, and he saw nothing
that could be denomitiatetivolgar.
Lord °atm—Did pint Lordship observe any difference
between the. Countess of Oidi and the other Italian
'Airs ?—No.
Lord Livegront..-1341 your Lordship consider her
a woman of prowl education ? —I hail not sufficient
with. her Morn) a judgment on that point.
We you introduced With the Countess of Oldi ?
Yes.
As the :doer of nerganii?—No.
Did you know she was sister of Bergami ?-1 heard
ij before I went to Milan.

Re-examiner! by Mr. TYNDALI..
While the Princess and Rergaini were tAgether, did
you observe any particular conduct between them ?
The ATTORNIPITAUNERAL objected to the question as
too general, and as referring to matter not touched up-
on in his cross-examination.
The Loom CHANCIILLOR was of opinion, that if rho
question was admitted, it would necessarily let in tbo
other side to a right o: inquiring further on the subject.
31r. BROUGHAM assurer! their Lordships that he should
not object, if stub was their pleasure, to the withdraw-
ing of, the question.
sessitwen CT THE PERRI'.
Ry Lord Ross.—Did you ever see her Royal High-
ness in company with any other person in a boat on :bst
lake of (:onsui-1 have certainly seen her in a boat os
the Lake of Como: I have certainly seen her in a boat
accotnpanit4 by another person.
M'bo was that person ?-1 have seen her in a boat wktb
Bergioni alone.
B% Earl BRHT.—I)iil your Lordship notice any par-
tienfsit familiarity passing between them, when yon thus
saw hit Royal Highness and Itergartil In a boar top-
Cher ?—Certainly, I never observed any conduct on that
oczasion which appeared to me to be indecorous.
s't Your Lordship has already stated that the Countess
Uhii had a little of the Lombard accent in her pronun-
ciation t• was arty impression made on your mind with
reord•so ber manners. as well as with regard to her
laagiage?—bi• chief impression was, that her manners
were quite in'offensive.
Were they the manners of an apparently respectable'
and nosiest woman ?—I saw nothing vulgar or itoosdeal,
la let 'lmportant. -*
Did yen sver.efelleit whether ber .conveisstion sal
deportment-ware each ae indicated 6 well-bmt wonnow
or a Mamma inferide station In soefiety?—l never ob-
served rte) particular vagaries.. •
The adhmt-haid writer was 'hero ordered to refer to
his : soot ortheir binishipc 'eternises! a doubt•
as hike Mowers readsked to the two loat.9loPoory
sad Mr. brougham sesammlidg flat 4154 reit anamer
fs
the bat isseiss was, List his Lordship bad saver ors

/

-.Bur •

'berreti.." any thit:g sulzar‘"44.l not- " any particular
•
Mr. burner hs%inlr referred to his notes,•it was ileetn-
psi most satlittetorr to re-itato lite question, and his
Lordship then admitted tbe correetne,s 'of his answer
&A &Ito v r reeurtleel.

no you recollert any impression retnaininr. on your
mind after vour ton aaaaa tlou the Countess (Hifi,
that cod trail conversed with a vulgar woman do
.not remember any such impression.
Uid yoo remark any difference between her manners
and the manners of other Italian ladies cannot say
I that there Wan no observable or material differs
I trice: Isl Id not perhaps call her a person of great
refinement, but there was no part of her conduct that
was singular or ea” to be distinguished Prow the greater
proportion of Italian gentlewomen.
Hy the Earl of Lireaeoob-11)0 yoo consider that her
manners and deportment were tl.ose of a Iranian who
had a!I the advantages of a good education, or whit had
passed her life in the best society?-1 did nut converse
long enough with her to be enabled to !urn' any clear
opinion on those points.
How often did your Lordship meet her ?—t met her on
two occasions, once at the Villa d'Este, and a second
time at Alilan.

I►ill you know nn either of those occasions that she
was the sister of Itergansi ?-1 believe! was not informed
of dirt circumstance on the first occasion, hut 1 certainly
was aware of the fart when 1 saw her at Milan.

liy Lurd EashiNE.—Tott have stated, as I understand,
that you noticed no defect of education or manners on
your conversing with the Countess 01.11?-1 had not the
means of forming any opinion as to the mode in which
site bad been educated, but it dill not appear to me that
there was an remarkable dilfereoce between her and
other ladies of the country.

By the Earl of srovanost.r.—At what part of the
table did year Lordship sit when von 'lined with her
Royal Highness the Princetis of Wale. at the Villa
d'gste ?—th the side opposite to her !loyal highness.
How was yonr Lordslii;t places, in this revert when
you dined with her Royal Highness at 31ilaii:—.1s well
as I MU able to charge my memory nith the ciri nut-
stance, I sat at her Royal Lliglines,'s side.
You hare already stated that liergami dined at that
table; at what part of it dill he take his seat !—lle sat, I
believe on the opposite sighs of the table.
Ili! your Lordship receive any particular attention
from her 'loyal —Blte always treated tie in a
veg gracious manner.
Was there soy thing remarkable in her deportment
towards Reetranti ?—1 remarked no peculiarity.
Where did Ilergaiars sister, the Countess Oldi, sit
on that or!•asiou?—lly the aide of Iterg.imi.
Who else were present ?-ILieutenatit I lownam, Wil-
liam .1. ustia, and a gentleman whom I understood to be
an Italian phi-skim:.
By Lord Rcrtretx.—Do you recollect what was the
size of the loom in which you SAW her Royal llighoess
and 13ergatui together na the lake of I out':'-1 recollect
that it was rather a small boat.

Was it in motion at the time:-1 hardly remember ex-
actly whether it was moving or nut.
Loro 110112.—While the Winrr•% and Bertram; were
together. 41'61 you observe an particular conduct be-
tween them i—Ne. _

When the noble lawsl saw the boat OD the lake, was it
far from the shore ?—No. _

How was Bergami employed in the boat ?-11e was
rowing,. .•
Hy the Pawl of DstunnTON.—Dlil toll never oli.erve
any in thee!, eortment of Tier Itoyal High-
ness toward. Ilereasni ?—1 never oh il ;inv.
W. the garden to which you have 3111'44 in the
rout.e of route evidence immediately aojarent to the
horse ?—The grounds were lai4 out about the house,
and the olive garden enntignons.
Hoes your Lordship know t!.e size of the eartion?—\o.
liv Lord lhat.t.ii:vos.—Was your Lordship's aster.
Lairs' Charlotte Lindsay, sliimi..ed from the service of
the Princes.. or did she leave it of her own accord 'l—
of her own irrorti.

By Lord Ei.t.t:xnoam•cn.—Did you recommend her
to leave the service of her !loyal If ighness ?—I
On this question bring nut some expressions of dis-
approbation were tittered by several Peers.
Here Lord layette tttttt suggested that he thought any
noble Lord. oho wished to put any question should
adhere as dearly its possible to the roles of evidence.
The Marquis of LaNsnowNE was of the same opinion,
and objected to thisspiestion.
The Lord CIIANtIMI.OR thought the question ought
not to be rot ; and accordingly both question anti
answer were ordered to be expunged from the minutes.
Ey Lord El.t.►sinottoccu.—Did you make any ob-
servation on :he manners of Bergansi ?—1 observed that
they were unobtrusive. I took no farther moire.
Did you ever hold an♦ conversation with Bergami
—Not particularly. The only time that ever I was in a
room alomd with Lim, was once in the gallery where hr
was slit-wing me some pietist's.
I' the opportunity you had, could you form any
opinion as to ilk having been in a superior situation ?
No, it slid not strike sue that hr had.
Ills Lordship then states! with reference to a former
part of his testimony, that he had an imperfect recol-
lection of having on some occasion remarked, but not
as an extraordinary circumstance, that, after dining at
the Villa d' Este, Ise had seen his Oreek servant in at-
tendance on her Royal Highness.
Lord lit.txnEstrie was then called, and examined.

Did you see her Majesty at Uenoe ?-1 dill.
1)it1 Lasly Illenbervir ever act in the suite of her Royal
Iliehness there ?—tilie did.
In what sitnation?—When Lady O. and 1 arrived at Gle-
nos, Lady Charlotte Campbell was expected. Lally Il.pro-
posed to the Princes., that as no lathes were with her,
she should attend her until the arrival of Lady Charlotte
Campbell.
Did yonr Lordship, slarint, the time that Lady 41. was
in attendance. dine at the table of the Prioress?—Fre-
quently. Harlot the interval between the 25th Of
March and the 17th of May, we dined there frequently.
Did you see Hergami there i—Every time I dint:d
there.
What did you see in the behavionr of the Princess to-
wards liercanti ?-1 saw the same behatioin towards
him as to the other nts. He wilted at the hack of
-
r her chair. anti often helped her to wine and *Oct things
which she wanted, and, as far as 1 recollect, he helped
no also.
j What was the heharionr of Itergami towards the
Princess ?—That of a servant.
Was it respectful ?—I 'lid not observe. If it had dot
'heen reipectfnl, I should have observed it.
What rompany did her Royal Highness keep dat-
ing your stay at Genoa ?—ln the house were Mrs. Pal-
can't and his two daughters, Lieutenant Iloweatn Lady
Vberlsete Campbell, when she arrived,. and bector
Holland on most harm but not all. Also 110114, Atlloelo
Noblemen. He ree;oltected one particularly, the Mar-
'Ahem John Carlo Nee& •
Did you see Lady W. Bentinek there 7-:7A.egeettt. ljr.
'iliknoa. •
At'the house of the Prineetet ?—Yes ; a 1 a ha.' .1.411
not recollect whether st dioner.or so.
, Were all the• people of rank at the hell. sine* lb.
-Moen, ?—1 'saw. all ledloe.of r.Nb amtre. 810 at of
0•• aolikti tit of the slates
r• Cross-examined hi doe So t:tfrres4
Did pout Lordship Ides is ?;•42‘41;

-.... __.

-.

•
111116‘ 7 - 4.•
1N~.40100111,