The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-02-14 00:00:00

Igh
411.) suppose
The First was divoree'd at the time be ascended t e
throne, anti be hoped Ministers would, in the course of
that night's debate, state how the fact was. If there
was'any truth in the story of his having married the
Undress of Kendal, it twist, otherwise, have been a left-
handed marriage, which there was reason to presume the
lairs of Clermont would not recognise. The King and
Privy Council, he contended, were bound to devote one'
of the blank. left in the Liturgy, attached to the Aet
of Uniformity, to the Queen-Consort. The King
sod Privy Council bad not the psyver to omit
names as they pleased, according to caprice, or
prejudice, but were to change the names and fill tap the
blanks as fitted to the occesions. It was a snbter-
(lige to say that the Queen was prayed for in the
Prayer for the Royal Family. The whole of his ar-
' gnment went to show that the Queen Consort must he
prayed fur by name i and if the act itself did ant
distinctly point that out, usage certainly did. The
non-compliance of the present administration with
this usage, was indicting a punishment which, to the
people at large, appeared very much like vindictive
feeling on their part. The people were convinced
that this act was the suggestion of disappointed men.
It proceeded from a contempt for the feelings and the
interests of the country, for its morals and religion,
and fast all judicial authority. They had now only to
cssusider what compensation they could make for
sufferings which they *ere bound to cousider were
unjustly indicted. If the Ministers persisted in re-
fusing to restore the Queen's name to the Liturgy, it
would be a pertinacity is error which conkd only in-
sure
to themselves dishonour and defeat, as well as de-
gradation to the dignity of the Crown. Let them ap-
proach the Throne with their herniate entreaties. The
King bad no doubt been grossly deceived; and Iliad
the omission never been made, her name certainly
would nut be erased at the present moment. And if
it would nut, he asked by what course of reasoning,
by what rhetoric, or what chain of casuistry, could
his Majesty's Ministers reconcile the continuance of
the omission ? They had mingled political consider-'
'miens, and malignant passions with religion.; feelings.
lie thought it ought to be no trifling consideration to
tisk even a temporary secession front the national
church ; and it was something to risk the continuance
of the present discontents. The whole country were
looking to the vote of that night as to their only
tope of retaining their grasp on the laws and the
constitution. In voting fur the motion of his Hun.
Friend, he conceived be was discharging a sacred
duty which he owed to the Public, to the Crown, and
to that House.
Mr. LEUUE adslressesi the House in a low tone of',
voice. He confessed that he had always regarded the
omission of the Queen's name from the Liturgy as ill-
liftvised and inexpedient, although be' did not dont*
that his Majesty's Ministers had advised that act from
a sense of duty. At the same time he thought the ori-
ginal insertion of her Majesty's swim had been much
over-rated. It would not, in his opinion, have been a
mark o f peculiar grace and favor, ae it could only he con-
sidered to be in compliance with the general custom:
and the effect of the omission was not such as to dispose
the mind,' of the people of the country, adverse to her
Ilajesty. thi the contrary, she had gained a great many
partisans by it. From the impression on his mind,
after all he had heard in that Muse ou the subject, he
slid not consider the omission as illegal. No Hoes. Mem-
ber would say that her Majesty had not been prayed for
by all the loyal, when included in the prayer for the
whole Royal Family. With respect to the late pro-
ceedings against her Majesty in the House of Lords, hr
could not bring his mint to conceive that any Ministers
of the Crown, in the nineteenth century, could so tar re-
trogade towards the dark ages, as to advocate such a
case against the Queen, with the support ut
hired svittiesbee. The grounds of his opposition
to the present motion, were the Queen s letter
to the King, and her answers to whir
(Hear, bear, hear '.)-lle cared not whether she ex-
sited the people of the rituality under the denomination
of " her subjects," or not ; it was on the broad general
tenor of her answers that he grounded his objection. It
had been said, allowances ought to be made for the
Queen's feelings • he was willing to admit that, hot he
could.put grant ;hat this allowance could be extended to
a aerie% of pultlicalons tending to inspire hostility to
every institution which was dear to the natives of this
country.—(llrar, hear.) —He could not agree that this
allowance should extended to a letter which reviled
the Sovereign, and strove to set the people in array
against Purliament.—(Hear, hear.)—lle could assure
the Hon. Member who brou!sht forward this lion, that
it the Queen.; 11Allit had been originally inserted in thee
Liturgy, those publications would be sufficient, in his
opinioe, to warrant it• erasure.—(Near, hear.)—Untler
these circumstances, he asserted that the restoration of
her Majesty's name would be repugnant to the wishes of
the great majority of the nation ; and carrying up an
Address to the Crown, founded on this resolution, would
be an unauthorisable interference with the Royal pre-
rogative, derogatory to the dignity of the Crown, and
injurious to the best interests of the country.—(clear.)
Mr. C. W. WYNNE regretted that he had not, at an
earlier period of the Session, been able to catch the
Sptsker s eye. Ile had, however, been gratitied by
besting the excellent speech of the lion Nlenther for
Oxford (Mr. Peel) on a former night, which entirely
coincided with his own sentiments. Althouele he thought
his Majesty's Ministers to blame in much, yet lie did
not think it amounted to their deserving to he denounced
by Parliamentary censure. He regretted the conduct
pursued toe Ards the Qteen in some instances—he re-1
gretted that no notification had hero given to her of tine
death of the late King, and still more did he regret that
no communication bad been made to her on the OCC3•
sion of her daughter's death. This was that which, in
his opiuiun, could have occurred in no private family.
whatever the conduct of the mother might have been.
He, however, while he stated this, could not see that the
Act of Uniformity respired that the name of the Queen
should be inserted in the Liturgy as a matter of right.
Ile had looked into the Act, amid found no mention of the
Queen iu it but in that disuse which gave they'
King the power of changing the names from tinie to
time. He then referred to several cases, to thew that
its insertion was not called for from immemorial ens-
ttim, or from the strenni of precedent. It nee optics' al,
frith
the Sovereign to change the names at his pleasur..
was sees hunt the introduction of the Elector Va-
lentine on oneucrasion, and sithsequently of that of the
retress Sn• phis. The Electress war not of the Royal
Family of F.iigland ; she eras only second cousin to.
A Queen Ann, feu the Queen caused tier to la. prayed for,

Honourable Member might not be intended to do this,
stiff in effect it would recommend her Majesty, if carried,
as an object of grace and favour. After all.that was stud
of the acquittal of her Majesty, and of her right to be
considered not guilty, before they recommended her
to anv mark of grace and favour, they must take.
into their consideration what. her Majeatv's character
was, and this must be expected to influence their
Pproceedings. He called upon them to look at what
ad been ilone in the case •f the Duke of Cumber-

land.. it was most unjust for the House to give hiss less
than they gave to the other members of the Royal Fa-
mily, if character seas to stand fur nothing. It was
true, that the late Queen disapproved of his marriage,
but this proved nothing against him, yet the House, act-
ing on the unfavourable impression created against that
individual, had refused to put hint in the same situation
in which the other members of the Royal Family had
been placed. In his opinion enough had been proved
against the Queen to make her unlit to be pointed emirs
a mask of race and favour. This a-as pressed still more
strongly on his mind by the public acts to whirls her
Majesty, through the influence of had advisers, hail lent
herself since her last arrival in England, and by the an-
swers which she hail riven to the Addresses carded up
to her, in which she hail been made to revile and to en-
deavour to throw discredit on all the institutions of the
country. To him it appeared that what had been done
with respect to the Liturgy was perfectly legal, and
he was not disposed now to call upon the Crown to al-
ter it.

Mr. WILBERFORCE had hoped that, by some ar-
rangement, and by means of mutual concession, the-
question that was now brought before the House might
he avoided. Unhappily this was not the case, and it
had become necessary for them to pause and to form a.
deliberate opinion upon the important wide itsader con-
sideration. He bad failed in meeting with an oppor-
tunity, a few nights since, of stating his views respect.
ing it, and must now begin with a full acquittal of his
Majesty's Ministers, and by expressing his entire cos-
turrence with an lion. andlearneil Gentleman, that no
blame could fairly he said to attach to them. Differing,
as he did, in many points, bodi wills his Majesty's Mi-
nisters and with several Hon. Gentlemen, for whom be
entertained great respect, on the course of these pro•
ceeulints, he thought it a debt of justice to say that
aliiiiaires had been placed in a mos: difficult and trying
situation. In the conduct Odds they had to purses.,
they were presented a choler of evils; and if they erred,
the error was one of judgment, anti did not, to his
mind, indicate any want of capacity, much less any
want of integrity. He had now, however, 6ibuirthiug
different in contemplation : he wished to take a prac-
tical view of the subject as the best le by which they
could note arrive at a satisfactory conclusion. Intenii-
leg to treat the question in this manner, lie innst, in the
first instance, examine the objections which had been
raised, on both *Wes, to the course of proceeding, to
which each was respectively opposed. If the only
doubt existing on the subject was that which involved
the legelity of omitting her Majesty's name, he should
not deem it of very high importance, and, after all he
had beard, should be disposed to leave the question
where lII' 114111 fiinlid it, in what had been called '• the
elorions uncertainty of the lair." Let it not, however,
he imagined, that he had not heard with pleasure and ad-
o& did!' the speech of an Honourable Gentleman (Mr.
Wetherell) on a former night. For a time the reasoning
of that speech produced a great etlect upon Isis mind ;
but when lie calm. to reflect further upon it, his doubts
returned, awl whether the original omission was legal
or illegal, the question was now to he regarded under
aoother aspect. Ile felt deeply the force of those cum•
sislerations which haul beets pressed on the attention of
the house by his Ilou. and Learned Friend (we believe
Mr. 11. Legge), and could not hut think t:iat her Majesty
in adopting sentiments so unlike the tone and language
which she had used in replying to the Address ut OA
lions', haul shown none of the respect clue to the Con-
stitution of Parliament and to the established lan s of the
country. Whatever excuse lie might be ready to make,
still it must be admitted that the reiteration of such sen-
timents went to violate theyonstitution, and were as in-
jurious to the public as they were dislimionrable to her-
sett—(Heat, hear, from the Ministerial lienclies.)—At
the same time it ought not to be considered that the
fault was so much that of the Queen as her advisers, anti
he had felt souse surprise that those who haul primed
the Queen's Icier, or perhaps some other documents,
bad not incurred the animadversion of the law. When
he supported the motion, he supported it, therefore, fur
the sake of the country, and fur no other reason.—(l'ries
of " Ilear, hear, hear.”)—He looked to the elicit which
was to be prcdseced on the bulk of the middle and
lower el . , who were at present left open to the assaults
and seductions of mischievous men, who lost no opportu-
nity of creating public confusion. The question generally
asked was, why should not things be restored to their
former situations That they were not so restored was
at ributed to some evil design, and this belief was care-
fully inculcated. Ile was aware that public men some-
times thought it necessary to make a stand upon particu-
lar questions, and rashly declared amongst themselvesa
determination to that effect , but he never had known
a subject on which it was less their interest or their duty
to enter into such an engagement. If concession were
to lead to many subsequent titeasnres, if it were gernii-
must and was necessarily to produce many branches, if
it was the beginning of a course that might lead to
an uncertain issue, lie should clearly understand the
force of their objections. On the contrary. however, the
act required was simple, and led to no further conse-
quences; it promised also to put an end to discussion',
in which lie hail found sonic of the best and ablest men
at variance. He Must here persist, although it might
appear singular, or again expose hint to derisioa, in the
opinion which lie had formerly expressed as to her Ma-
jesty being already prayed for um{ o. the general title of
"ail the royal family. • As this might be retarded as
a quibble by sons,. persons, lie should not further advert
to it; and returning to the general impression, lie
thought it impossib:c that any Honorable Member could
have failed to observe that a very common remark
anetngst the the people was, " if the Queen is bad, there
is the more reasoa to pray for her." This might serve
to illustrate what was undoubtedly true, that the
goodness or badness of individual character ought
not to influience the admission or exclusion of names
from the Littirgy.—(Criesof hear, hear.) If questions
of this kind were always to be tried by that test, the in.:
convenience and uncertainty would soon become obvi.-
, ons. Should it he necessary to mark the sense enter-
taiturd of any impropriety or misconduct, it might he
stone in some other way, as, for example, by a di:flints-
him: of allowance. The people now found-that her Mie.
jest- was restored to all the preroguttiveioNueeis, and.
could not feel satisfied that she ought at the same time.
to he excluded from their prayers. This excinaion was
a most unhappyeirrainetince iu another reaper % Patina,.
ae lie did, that it bad bceu the ne. ens of introducing

sion , net amongst freque...
churches.—(Hear.) The latter did not always regard
every set of the crown as the act of its advisers, although
this was the constitutional principle, and although he
himself felt satisfied that if his Majesty did know the
general sentiment, or the satisfaction which might be
communicated to the great body of his subjects by
the measure, lie would wish for its immediate adop-
tion.—(Rear, hear.) Of all the considerations, there-
fore, which influenced the opinion that he had formed
that of the effect produced by the exclusion of her
Majesty's name on the popular mind was the most
operative. The omission was brought under public
notice every Sunday, and the wound which might
otherwise be healed was kept in a •state of continued
irritation. Such an effect could not but be prejudicial to
our ekerch establishment at a time when there were
but * many causes at wort for its overthrow--it a
time when so many mischievous men were industrionity
employing every means for the destruction both of ear
religious and civil constitution. He bad been informed
that the Queen whilst excluded from the prayers of the
established Church, was prayed for in most of the Me-
thodist Chapels. Nothing, in short, seemed so well
calculated as the present state of things for bringing
iris disrespect and contempt an ecclesiastical system,
sealed with the blood of martyrs, and from which the
dissenters themselves had derived all the advantages
which they enjoyed. lie would, therefore, guard anti
cherish, with redoubled earnestness, what was PO sacred
in itself, and was now threatened by so many dangers.
Thoaesta tigers were rendered formuidahle,botis by the pees-
sure of the times and the unceasing efforts made by the ma-
firious to estrange the present generation from the re-
ligion of their forefathers. True justice, true dignity,
and trite magnanimity, did not, in his opinion, consist
in resolutely adhering to a measure, hecaose it
hail been mire adopted. It' its abandonment was
likely to confer a substantial benefit on the coun-
try. it became a magnanimous as well an
honest man to sacrifice his own opinion to the gene-
ral interest. Let nut the house conceive, let not any
llonourablellember conceive, that to yield to the pre-
seat motion was to declare a belief of the impotence of
the *seen. With hint (Mr. Wilberforce) the innocence
or guilt of her Majesty weighed not a feather. Inde-
pendently of any feeling upon that point, he would
vote for the motion, because he thought that its success
would go to tranquillise the country ; if it would not at
once restore peace and harmony to the kingdom, it
world at least remove onecauseddiscontent—one cause
I perhaps of many, but certainly a cause of very consider-
able weight. 'Perhaps the feelinut upon which he had
acted during so many years, a feeling the advantage of
which he had never yet found cause to doubt ; perhaps
that feeling might impress his mind more powerfully
than it would effect the minds of those whom he was ad•
dressing; hut lie would vote for the motion of his Hen.
relation, if it were only that the motion was framed in
a pacific spirit, that it tended to heal the wounds under
minds aboomesertry woe safFeriog.—(Hear, hear, hear.)—
Never, perhaps, hail the house been in more dan-
ger of opposing itself to public opinion than in the
pres.ost case ;—never, perhaps, could the countey with
more advantage advert to the principle adopted by Mr.
Pitt, when, fooling the public feeling strung against his
own, he gave up his own opinion to time opinions of time
j people of England. That principle which led Mr. Pitt
to seek a peace with France at time moment when he him-
self was disposed to a continuance of the war ; that was
a principle of conduct which proved him worthy to be
the minister of a free country ;—a principle which, by
attaching the alfertions of the people to the government,
prevented the well-meaning from being misled, and from
becoming time dupes of time ill-disposed. If, when the
various temporary causes of discontent should have
passed away, if then the wound which he (Mr. Wilber-
force) How sought to heal were left to fester and inflator,
ill consespiences, be feared, would be time result of such
neglect. When lie reflected that a Sunday could not
pass without recalling the suhjert to the public mind,
he much feared that they would have to regret that they
had not removed the cause of so much dissatisfaction
and discontent. It was not with any reference to her
Majesty's dignity or honour that he reeminnenuled the
motion of his lion. Relation; be slid it in deference to
the conacieatious and religious feelings of a great portion
of the people, and, shove all, front a fell sense of what
was dee to the well-being of the country, whose feelings
ought to be pacified—(continued cheers fur some minutes.)
Mr. sruA KT WORTLEY was compelled, al-
though with regret, to differ from time hon. member
who had last spoken. Granting that he could not
agree with the people in their opinion, that bun.
member was still prepared to ground his vote upon
his deference to their wishes, and he called upon the
house to follow his example. Time view which he
(Mr. S. Wortiv) took of his duty in parliament was
this ;—he was to give all due weight to the represen-
tatious of his constituents, to listen to their prayers.
(bear.heor,) and to the arvinents be which shey en-
forced them, and then to vote accoraing to his own
opinion —(heer, hear, and laughter.) epou that
principle it was that his vote on time present occasion
would be founded ; and he would explain to the Noose
why lie could not, after what had happened, advise,
the Crown to bestow any mark of grace or favour]
upon the Queen, True, the sense of a great body of
the people had clearly declared itself in hsvaur of the
effect of the present motion ; but lie (Mr. S. Wort•
lee) thought that time people had coinus to that opinion
under an erroneous impression. The people thought
that or exelnde the name of the Queen from
the Liturgy was to deprive her of a right ; and
if once he (the hun. member) could be of that opinion,',
he would undoubtedly vote for the iusertion of her ]
name; but he voted against the present motion because
ant even all the eloquent speeches he bad heard had
convinced hint that in the exclusion there was any]
thing illegal. lie did not put the ner.ative vote which
he proposes, to give upon the ground taken by the Hon.
Member (Mr. Legge) who haul spoken for the first time.:
npon time present occasion ; lie deprecated the language:
put forth in her Majesty's Addresses, and in her letter tom
the king; but Parliament might in another way to mark l
its disapprobation of that language; he (Mr. Stuattl
Wortley) would' not on that account exelode bee Ma-i
jest's name from the l.itncgy. But the Queen, most 111-1
whose-illy, had rejected the mediation of the houirie ; shel
haul refused to take any steps by which the differences
between the illustrious parties could be arraltod Ae
heal pat herself npen her trial: and, in soputtingisenietir
she took the fist of any impression which might be ip_ro-
dared by eirconistences coining out doriag that
Now there were some fact' of AAA. 4.1 was itapelleibliPigi
,
divest tne mind ; and although he (air. S. Wortley)

.

long isl 'het
et*
(ChArs,)--: ore _
Rouse with a words as to his . . consluct in
her Majesty's cue It was well known to those *ha
were in Parliatuent In 1812 that he had at that time ex-
pressed himself most strongly upon the subject of the
differences of the Royal Family ; and be bad then said
what he stilt thought, that, at that period, the Queen
was most unstilal treated.--(Hear,ltear.)—The opi-
nion which be bad then expressed be still mainttantl :
and he did believe that a great deal of the feeling now
fluting in favour of the Queen might beiraced back to
the indignation excited by, 0-- course of conduct tut
. _
part,

the .
181% pursued against her. -He WT led. to
hary all that bad passed in "ohlivibn—(lamgitter)
he thought that it might be done, provided, the House
Ina not called un to vote upon motions like the present
but if he was driven to say whether he would call upon
the Crown to hold up the Queen to the respect of .
country, be mast say that there had been such circit-n •
stances pyoved against her najtisty as laittliced him,
most decidedly, to negative the measure.
Mr. MARTIN (of tialway) rose, amid coughing an I.
cries of " question ;" and fur some time we were unable
to each the drift of his argument. When we could col-
lect the hon. member's words, we found him expensing
his surprise that the honourable member far Ili-anther
should he supporting a motion in the very teeth of Opt
with which lie had himself come forward on a former
occasion. The truth was, there must be a giving way ;
and if the Queen, who was in the wrong, would not give
way, then, thought the honourable member for firatnlart,
the crown, which is in the right, must—that's all. -
(Hear, and langliter.)—The honourable member's pri ti-
elide (eontiuued Mr. Martin) puts me in mind u( &little
matter which happened in my conntry.--(Langhter.)
A friend of mine committed a great outrage upon some-
body one night, anti next morning he asked toe--"
snas
will Ido said lie, " You are the wrong doer; tu.l,•tis
he sure, you'll make an apology," said I. But he woold
not make any concession at all. Well—tbe friend of the
Injured party, as a man of honour should ilo, waited en
me: " lour friend ii inejae wrong, and he'll apologise."
says be. " Faith yon may ?mike a riddle of his holy,
but devil of any apology you'll get from him," said I.
" But what's to he done ?" said he. `• That's what I
don't know," said I. " Matters have gone so far we'll
never get out without an apology sotneway." " I tell
you again--says I—apology my friend will make none."
01e, then,. faith I have it —said be—if your friend
wont' apologise, to be sure mine shall, and that trill Ito
just the saute thing yon know."- -(Cheers and laughter.)
Mr. Martin eoncluiled by dissenting front the motion.
Mr. LENNARD said lie was very glad that it Is a 1
been at last admitted by gentlemen opposite that the ex-
elusion of her Majesty's name from the Liturgy was 1
punishment: he had always considered it so : and tie
thought it unworthy of the Noble Lord opposite to con-
tend, as be had done on former occasions, that it W4i
not punishment. Ile had heard with great surprise
member fur Montgomeryshire, and the member f
Yorkshire, contend that the restoration of the Qtmets• 4
mama to dm Literary was me net of wean sod fermi -.
lie would not attempt, after the luminous argtouteet on
a former night of the lion. member fur Oxford, to ;roe
the trestion on the strict construction of the Act of
Parliament ,• but it seemed to him that no man who
honestly and sincerely applied himself to this spiestioo,
with the assistance of those arguments,could have a dout,t
that the rejection of her Majesty'r name from the I. -
turgy was an arbitrary and illegal assumption, in 0:e
teeth of the true meaning of the Act of Parliament. N •
man, in his opinion, could read that statute wit`to
being convinced that it was never meant that th..re
should he any discretion to alter or change beyond via:
alteration which might become necessary by death, or
other inevitable accident. But the truth was, there was
no law to reach the Queen : and therefore new larva were
to be made and old ours broken. She Was tit be Finished
and then heard, castigatque atalityse. She was to !or
punished with more than Rhailamanthean injustice ; for, .
after being punished and beard, and tried and acquitted •
—the prerogative of the crown—that prerogative-con-
tended for by ministers, butt denied by the people--no-
thiprerogativeof mercy,which was admitted,huttlie•kre-
rogative of vengeance, which was denied—was set'np
%apply what was deficient in the rigour of the law. Itliad
been said, that as the Queen's name had been already ea-
eluded from the Liturgy, it would be inexpedient to eft
it in agai n.W hat was this argument.but an admission that
accusation, coining front the quarter from whence it cam
was to be taken as proof of guilt? He was tint surprised it
this from gentlemen who had approved of the exclusion rif
the Queen s name from the Liturgy before her trial.
This act served to mark the spirit of the proceetline
against her—those proceeding% anomalous in the antaii
of our history, of the worst times of our history ;
served also to quark the iiretlit which was due to any
sentiments its favour of jostlee professed by his Alaji-s-
-tv*s ministers. No one coulrhare forgotten how:at:et
the Manchester Massacre, they deprecated any expreta
lion of opinion which might prejudice that litteetion‘
vet tbe•,• Paul not been unwillitrg to brand the Queen a'
guilty larfore her trtal—'her anouralons trial, when her
judges were her accueers, and her licensers the paid set•
vents of her husband the complainant, and the supposed
injured party. But above all she had a greater nsisfort
tune than having her judges for her accusers: they weie
her former friends: and it *as the commonest observa-
tion, that none so persecuted •thell• former religion all
those who had abandoned it. " Itenegadoes "never
change by halves." All her former friends, to whonashe
should have looked for support, had deserted her in het`
minim need, and witn one exception (land lie doubt... 4
even the truth •of that exception), had ranged then?.
selves against her. It was trite that the Member fcr
Liverpool was not them that night to urge the rants
of government against the Queen ; it was true that l`f
had culled bee the grace and ornament of soelety.;
bat was it nut also true that he had coinciilek
in the early measurrisagains` her; at all events he had
thought her unworthy of his support; avid left her to hi.
defended as she itairegt t but she had foniid in the people.
of England—in public that inherent ftelitrq
, of jostle, which is ilsysayss to•befotind hi' the breasts At
an enlightened and • free pearpte-;Lthat pity -anti • support
*back bad been-denied to her by the Members ot•lnii-
linshantre family. He coblit Me the intisann *by iao
conviction was so be Wiriest into the- issiode of his Ma:
ittltVe Willi titer% :. essekio sane refeersent was her:
s.
imotto. They ci riot Agri •to he ailfeere.--t4 eonfes• •
*it their Milan Co ainivition bad heleoldeeeliod:os• ahos
it had tie.eiveskilte'ts. Art the the bid done was to
lfe *tierensled anti supported:l hitt he tfill-uotleellie
opecrig the Azit whim jttlitite. tieleyed,• aeilidd
'length be done: • A•kw
Ithn,•in a speech as ro‘arleable.
itt conducing' find oti
tined•hisentresctiom
with anti: two
.other Mientbirk;
Mime *islet he trephOirdin
aVfontierettlelvitl at-the
the state et public t'teli

• - s • Abe ._ ..... , • . •
4 i . .... ~ a . , ora...- l- --ar : •
.. 1...-1- ...
• ~..,,, .. -.-..4160•60.,.......P0, : -. to
...- .. . - . •..--....0. .
...-.--- -..--- ... - --...---- ...--....- .m..
ihat.this Act was ip agitation, and Ishis was advally,pre• .**d Sio Ititi.4wit fit !Wild 014110110111aill *Ph; loth Inkiest foefluX into t 41116.-,-fflittl% ... r • :" , . - • • , •
lent at the bar of the !lons. of Gorda es May •19, ililt, Konoesimielfsfsly's*d SA, SkaajaCto .btii,litilesty gls titan Mu) hefoiaireea hi haislfot , ' $L '' " %
,1_
icZi , , . r ,1.. a• .fb.r AZ . . Fie u
le hear the Royal assent given toil. Two months after for wiest'she &id cone. "Ms cosestltrgiao4 Ibe the ON fte.,:esteciloa, 64, ire wakp . , ftet. pa 014 r a
the King was married to Catherine, sodtbie wia enmigh Noose was this, whether the Aa ienplalied it int). in. wee urbon be might fo aktilargir:iri i•- ' ''4 . ' • litt;ele.4 fr:.‘ . • 11104141/"..' • 11
..
fo spew that this was contemplated by the Legislatere posing it to be legal, was of such a character as to call 4 44 wheithe might dig* sa.from histatisalkeani• to i • fis disa 4:1 . -at t thud mg a
iii framinx the clause relating to the Royal Fimlly said upon them; the great Council of the nation, to regain. sites es which disturbed the•course of boost! life. It -• • -Rata ' frea thsi 1) • goy. a,. vei,
Royal ,Progeny. No one coining within this descrip that Ministers shonld advise his Majesty to revoke it? was day•wben the aleanintS of discord aSould be at • *Xi nele3reiteLtubis ; ..Ringii lo th„„, „.7 ...,"'
tion from the time of the passing of this act to the pre- He did not think they ought to take such a course but rest, and when every recollection that ilea trod to be ciiiialdsted an nest op Iph t fatilltt ata to
_,,soit
sent time. had been omitted in the Liturgy. Witb re- where the let 'called hi question was glaringly inapro- create disunion, or excite jarring.sentiaseins, should, if if the Saute *pinion.
sped to the Consort of George the First, ho was willing per. This was not, in his opinion, 'wick a case as be. passible. be avoided. True, it nuFht be said, that to re- wsuld ire tie to gage% the citti .-411se,'Wesv.
should 'he inlittriel tlie HeiNii,lt
to give the benefit of that to the other side. It bad al- had supposed,, and the conduct of the Queen was nut, in store her MajeitY's name to the Liturgy would now pro- hear, Elvin t/ip opposition benches.)::-11 spite of ufhat
ready been most satisfactorily explained by the Hon. and his opinion, that which shonld col upon the House of duce the same effect, because it would amount to the was asserted by geatlesea on the nth* 'idle, 14 Wig
Learned Member for Knarrieborbogb (Sir 4. Mackin- Commons to recommend her to any mark of grace or triumph of one party—(Hear) ;—hut he malt take leave lineiocediket the votes elite HOlie bad &hand, gone
tosh.) There was every reason to suppose that George favour from the Crown; and though the motion of the to say, that those who would triumph on such so ices- a long wa towards tranqiiillittluit tt eaantrt•-•
Lt.
the First was divorced at the time he ascended the Honourable Member might not be intended to do this, sion were net amongst the chief frequenters of our (ChArst)-: • ore he sat 'down be wtati trouble .the
___.... . _ _ _.. :_..... _____- -e -art:. .w......,..-...1A ..............1 i.. 1. %to:mate :r ...,,i.a_ churches.—fflear.) The latter did not always regard House with a words is to his general Cowduct in
.. .

partsable fbe items*? shserril
ottiewhAtisiug In ' Irttt de•
bit if be bidlosOontef t>teY lode,
Menviresii; itfll taut Ibe-titsrett%
,tierfis the Litiref. be*ti
itersitienhat fisli-esugiflgtitiess cr.
link. he was sure that he bad