The Statesman.
London, England, 1822-02-26 00:00:00

n:tsoica►ing with his family and friends,
tics of preventing any communication
ml Members of Parliament was intolerable.

Itmi be anowered, perhaps. that an application
have been made to the magistrates, who •
every satisfaction on the subject, and would
grievance which might really exist. Bet
truce themselves were not, peobably,
abuses which existedt and even though they

'.I.9OLIMAtra willing to corsass...—_
atop hot awthorlsed and sanctioned them.
whereat& (I latiestei% it appeared by the Rep
Comsdadossets, who- were appointed by the
tit inquiry Into the existing abuses, tins
h id in some casts been applied,--(Hear, het
what he bad bees able to discover, he was ioclin'ed
I eve thot tits odious and oppressive practice
complained-arose oat of a -desire which the
lascasterbed to oppose She progress of Airlift—
RAM. Tbe magistrates were hostile to Reform, and
veto therefore amities en know if any thing had been
;44 on that subject laths prisoner's cerrespondeoce.—
With-that view they hod given orders to the gaoler to
luau oyes aU lettevsaidressed to the prisoner, or sent
from him. The swigistrates having at first some doubts
of their authority. submitted a case for the opinion of
comsat. The opintos was given in favour of them, and
the pottier Was declared lawful. They did net, however,
flidarthat t site suMeient. They then deterailood ow is-
stedweiat wee rules and regulations into dos govertm
omit of, this prises. be would maintain that the praetiems
was sot *sly' lama *f privilege. but was also a via=
lotion of thew laws. The Hon. Member then adverted
thaboideasts, dm 9th of Anne, and read one or two
cheeses. owe of which prohibited any person knowl•gly
aid willingly to ream, to epee letters, Lc. eseept by
mimeo warrast io sailboat of one of his Majesty's Be.
=Ns Waste. After commenting on the enacting
ethos statute, the Hon. Member begged leave to
naiad the bow of a document which was entirely fa
awliseasity with hie own opinion, and which was a doe
dgsdott of the law. Ho mllsded to the letter of Lord
SitiMmtb. the late &snowy of State, written on thelfth
o ,flonsrber,lBl4, tollitheeper of the gaol of Gloom's.
UNA drealorcopy of that-letter was sent to every comity.
goalie The Hos. Hest. then read the letter.
and the illegal practice of opening 10tt0.%
adelossili 'sae primmer, or. seat by them. Tim !Ifs.
gistratiapretended.tothe power of making mkt sad
regidadoms for thirprisos, Nader the ' authority d the
384 sf Yearge slim &weed, chapter the 29th. Bet be
appre that that Act did not coffer on the
3.1.041691•11 esisf east`-authority. The Hon. Member
the lead ems slaws* tits Act, which related to cam.
raasieedwas With per debtors. &c. He contended it in-
cluded all primula. Wows as well as debtors. The spi-
rit ofthe Act throundonst was humane is the extreme.
It showed that the olinet in the contemplation of Par-
hawse tams M allittridist and net to exasperate the suf-
ferings of the esfeetadate primmer'. But it might be
collated.. that tholtsfridise oforsing letters bad been
sanctiosed by the askew( Shwpalwa. He *veld show
that the letters wen Iwokessapeo before those rules ea
which so much Meese would be kid were drawn up. lie
Would not messy bush expressiows, when he should
say, that rules so oppressive had mot been put into prac-
tice in any Other gifol in the leinwdom. Such oppressive
regulations bad not-bees adopted by the Soutersembi re
blitgistrites elan towards Mr. Hunt, who, whatever the
Attorooptleattral might say'of him, bad by his conduct
too l by-the isnairy, of whichle was the chief author,
rendered the most permanent service to the cause of ha.
;sanity. Ho demisted whether, under the 3i'd of George
11. sirs Magistrate. could enact any mash rules as they
pretended. For that opinion he had an authdrity which
in that house was entitled to the greatest possible re-
storer. He meant that of the late Sir Samuel Romilly,
who gave an opinion on the subject, when in 1812 he
permuted a Petition to that house, from a person con-
fined in Lancaster Gaol. He, on that occasion, stated
that the County Gaol bad belmiged to the High Sheriff
of the county, and that toe Magistrates bad no tight to
interfere with him in the management of it. They
should not presouseto meddle with the prisoners, the
rare of whom belonged of right to the county Sheriff.
and fat ethos. comfort and safe custody he was bound to
provide. That was the opinion of Sir Samuel Hominy,
and by that opinion he (Hr. James) felt that be was
warranted in saying, that the opening and istercepasx
of thom letters were contrary to late. Batif,after all,
it should be the opinion that the 39d Ono. M. gam to the
iilagistrates the power of establishing those_ objection-
able and odious regnlations, the sooner such an Act
was repealed the better. Hating said said so much on
the illegality of the practice, he would trouble the home
with a few observations on it, as a breach of the privi-
lere of Parliameat. So ter as be was personally coot
.erne,) in the question, his intention was, if he had
mmght fur protection at all, it iliould be in a Court of
Le n•, *bore he had no doubt of obtaining a verdict be-
fore an %martial Judge and Jury. That would be the
mode which lie would adopt fur his own satisfaction;
lwt when he hid been informed that the cause, of com-
p'•iint was a breach of Parliamentary privilege. Le at
v.:ye determined to bring it under the consideration of
V.:it house, the Members whereof it so much affected. In
bringing forward that question, lie felt that be was doing
his duty a. a Member of that Louse, and in defending
their privileges, be was doing more than that—Le was
endeavonring to alleviate the sufferings of the poor un-
loopy prisoners.—(Hear, hear.)—He concletle,t, by
tatmmg a resolution to the effect, that it be the opinion
of that honer, that any person proved to have broken
open any letters addressed to or from Members of that
house, he guilty of a breach of Parliamentary privilege.
The motion being seconded, and then put by the
Speaker—Mr. It. PEEL. and Lord STANLEY rose at
the spine time, and the former baying. given way,
Lord STANLEY did not see on what ground the
motion ofthe lion. Gentleman, for declaring the open-
ing of a letter from a Prisoner to a Member of Parlia-
trisnt a breach of their privileges, could be sustained.
oitnilar question Ind been started last year, and re-
Prred to a Committee of Privileges, and he hail never
beard that they felt it incumbent upon them to bring
the enhject forward. That the practice complained
of, would, under some circumstances, amount to a
breach of moral justice between man and man, no one
conld deny; but there were limits to the privileges
eine to letters, and when lie found that the opinions of
lientleruen of the profession of the law, of Magis-
trates., and even of the Judges of the land, were
stronglyin favour of the practice complained of in a
ease like that most particularly referred to, lie could
not think that there were sufficient grounds for assent-
leg that a breach of privilege had been committed.—
One of the rules ordered that the Keeper of the Jail
should examine all correspondence carried on by pri-
soners on the Crown side, and not forward any letter
which contained improper matter without skewing it to
the Chaplain or onesof the Visiting Magistrates. Ines
tie letter was submitted to the proper persons, if the
letter' came to a prisonea, he was sent for, and**
unexceptionable parts were read to him t..iirtititi
tutee; was written by a prisoner, he was told what,
were the esceptioaable parts, and had the liberty a
rievrritieg that which was not offensive. Tide ride
swim oedema! by Mr. Justice Bayley, mail he helletml
sins filthe of that Learned Judge him-
self ; end the.whOe of the code wu sauctioned hi Mr.


Mr. PEEL bad understood the Hon. Wisher Om-
tablish his case upon two propeeitioss ; first, that for
any one to open a letter freshet' by bias was In
act, and secondly, that it woe *breed. of the pelei--
leges of Parliament. Noeeilf be applied Itiserelf trY
disprove both these proposition, be limited that 114
should be considered to meet the quistiii tarty, He
certainly had beard with Inch aurprise,,spos a for*
user occasion, the doctrine laid dams by the Mom. awl
Learned Member for Winebeisesspes this eubjese;
and he thought that the Hos. and Learned Member,
himself, upon consideration, would be rrii to el%
that be bad taken too wide a groainl,4o•2lobl
Lord who spoke last had pot tie House 1s Pelfillaioe
of the facts of the present ease, as foe :alt.eellieded
the rules and regulations itemplaingd 04 .Whose re-
gulations had been salsetiosed by Mr. Justice Park
and Mr. Jamie.* Doyley. latim fire! plum, he thought
there was strong presatbptiog iii'faeour of the legility„
Of the act, in the fact of the 'Jades baring ilgestl
the roles which antbatised it. Apd that, too, net
without consideration,: for he understood that ibex
altered some of them, and that the case which gave
the power of opening letters, wattle the hand-writing
of Mr. Justice Bayley. He therefore coot-elm& not-
withstanding the authority of the? Hon. Member' for
Carlisle, that nothing illegal base bees committed.-,-
The Hon. Member had appealed to the Act of George
11. which bore so reference to the• present case, sod
at the same time neglected to sides a more resent
Act passed in the 31st of George 111. under which
these regulations had been made. The former Act
applied to debtors only. The lion. Member bad read
to the House the title and preamble of that Act, sod
be would follow his example by stating the contests
of the preamble to the other. It was on act for regu-
lating jails and other places of confinement. The
preamble set forth, that for the better government of
such places, rules and regulations, and bye-lows
should be made by persons authorised so to do In the
Act of George 11. And who were those persons? the
Magistrates. And upon that Act the Judges bid an•
doubtedly sigoed the rules of "bleb the Hon. Member
complained. With such sigsatgre affixed to the
orders for a:doming tame- ediembe gels, iodated, that It
I would be wasting- the time, and altuilatthktiodol-
fleece of the honer, to dwell' bey leitXfe•kiemi the
question of their illegality. He. *MAW the
consideration, whether or not a breach of thprivi-
leges of Pei-Bement bad been committed. For the
sake of argument, he must get the Hmsearable Mem-
ber to concede, that the rale which gothorififid the
Act of opesing the letters of pet/meet WM Willi
Mid,. And be would contend, that if it:llititoluidhl
in law, there was nothing whiels could exempt g.filteim
bee of Parliament from sharp% its common Opera-
tion. The only privilege which s Member of parlia-
ment possessed was that of franking his letters; but
they were as liable to be opened by the authority of
the law as those of any other individual is the state.
The Act contained no clause which exempted a Meow
ber of Parliament from its operation, and it bid hi-
therto been suffered to apply to all parties, without
distinction. The Honourable Member had alindea to
the letter of Lord Siilmotak'tiajthe keeper of Glou-
cester gaol. , That letter was *ratio in seesequeace
of a complaist made to the House of Lends from two
p -mons co/tamed is Gloucester geel, one of whom was
a debtor, and. the other confined for a misdemeanor,
which complaint *as referred to the Law Officers of
the Crown. His belief was, that the word " felons"
occurred in the letter by mistake. His Lordship
meant to have written " debtors and lines." He bad
referred to the opinions of the Law Officers. and there
he found the words " debtors and fines." He had
oleo mentioned the circumstance to • Lord Sidmouth
himself, and his Lordship concurred in the supposi-
tion, that the mistake had either been made by him-
self or by the clerk in copying his letter. The case
which led to the Report of 173.5, was with the Post-
office. And in a case where a letter had been pat
into the Post office and then opined, undoubtedly
there was a breach of privilege. But that was no
case in point to the question b7ffure the house. Be-
fore the letter was put in the post, the Magistrates,
upon the authority of the law, demanded that cer-
tain regulations should he complied with. But
in the case of 173,5, the Resolution expressly declared
that a gross breach of privilege had been committed,
by opening a letter add d to a Member of Parlia-
ment at the Post.office. The Hon. Member had stated,
that in defending the privileges of the House upon this
occasion, lie iris defending the liberties of the people.
He (Sir. Peel) trusted that no Member of that house
would ever claim privileges which Were not, In fact, the
privileges of the prople.—(Hear, hear!)—The It'ght
lion. Gentleman, after again enforcing the position-that
Members of Parliament had no exemption tram the re-
, gulationa in question, founded as they were upon the
law of the land, concluded by moving the previous
question.
' Mr. G. BENNET could not agree to the doctrine laid
down, that a body of Magistrates and two Judges Lad
the power of legislating and making fresh laws for the
government of prisons. All they could do by the Act
was to regulate the laws already made, sada as appoist-
ing the tins* of labour, managiwethediet .4 ordering
arrangements of that nature. 'lf they had' the po*erat-
tributed to them by the Right Hon. Grodramo. they'
had the power of changing lie years simptir i seg-
ment to •five years solitary conMeement. He t
sone of the taw authorities would boldly state that
hail mole power. • The' eil-culai' of 'Lord ap.
plied to fiefs as well as elebtoritimbti the opiniol of Law
Officers at that period expressly saidtbet the la antlid
not apply manes. le tbsougie the Judges b milk-
dosed alrule by which esti aid felorowere ego*
mitord MIL Heitegged moat his *tanks to-the gilt
Hon, fieseklums. fiertmorlng tag preihaus idealists Jll4
floor thou putting a negative duns the propositioe of
IfoasurabletPnead. The ptreimis question only
•71 (i •
.'4"

tee&
4 otT/It2emeettbeet the eporatiolh:et 1 kW, .
this esters.. Weeildi-ilty use my that. Missiweet I
a right t. holiViskeetima latemearse •with OApts.%
while others lititer.tiehted it ?: liitel42lilA'ltet#
,no) 'Hewed pereitillnieelikereth b
.iWilgstesk,
they hold latercotirei,,ky)itter ? was tisk* Nig
rimed that there wa ms! isit-My witiola hieesheessii
Paeliamest bad gestakelsividegeo of - . •
with felons, or yerioso,'eselidell for miodesseemelle;
then any other clue of' "ii the state. ' ''''
Hr. SUMBA!. didno= Hutt' did Right Hon.
rotary or/keit bad mode oat 'a salficieetly straw
to rebel the opinies of the,Mon. Mover. He
Mt it would he much testae to man the risk •I
damage which might arise Rom a fro* istoreoerse
Oki prisoners by lettere, then Ite allow the Aimee of
!them acts ',enmity sad 'prided") to. Which the cokes
seed regolatlesicompleisest ofisiglit Jiro dem' ~
Sir R. WILSON sisoo,l4,b. fly as attar
' woke to preemies**. bet 'hem oreseme which bolsi
the present ease in the reign of William aid Mary.--. 4
It was a Reseletioe of the House, "that any letter
beteg broken °pea wbleh came frees, or was directed.
to, 'a Member of Parliament, as a "breach ef Ihit,pik,
Jrileget of this House." When he serr,,oht Rope*
whitth the Lexamisaieners had made as SO Ole stateef
Ilebeeter gaol, he was of opinion that Wisher gaolers
Per Magistrates snakes be treated, and that Members
sf Parliament ought to hare the freest access to pri-
ions, in order to prevent such practices.
• Mr. C. WYNN was of opinion. that neither a breach
of the privileges of that House, nor the, law of the
laid. bad bees committed is the pewit lastasee.—
The act clearly extruded no farther Mims the Post-
trace. aid the privileges of •Mombereeiet so farther
than as reittrded the Post-eflice:' Wbei they looked
at the precedent of the resolethie of'aos, i, ~,,,,,,lii
be well to look to the cases which lido, Hist rowels
lion. The ease was a eomplaist kook Om lost-maims
at Hull against the Governess of that "pkee. who area
iI. the practice of seeding for eber Malik** red opeio-
- what letters he chose. H. bellifed that the &it
whfilt had been referred to, rare the Igegletratse the;
power which they hed.ozereked‘ Before thossacte
Were passed, the gaoler ideseteßhadtthe power ofeloiag
any thing which be bold essesearw tothe.saleitnepler
of the poi and the safe enetedrot the peskier*. ..Hr.
could then place priseseta le solitary.sieflemweat tor
refractory conduct. or for dimes miss( the eegetliis
Oahe of the pekoe. To puce that power lathe. head,
of Magistrates better qualified. to eterroiss it.,was tbs.
'Wool of the Acta. arid be bad so doubt of thrill having
now the power of orderiag solitary eeafinemest, where
ilemimamtmes callod'for it. The arils to which a ri-
miest of the power if examinisg letters wopld gke
✓ise,. were of the meet lawless character. h might-4d
the escape of primmer*. of defitet the idiotism et :es&
fenders msaseeted with others *beady spriaiessidskl4e
Bien (althoseleit wasan entities cave) pikes might
be coareyed to Misdeals by litter, so ;to eatM,
them to avoid stefferingthe sestences or - Iltr.„ i ' b
saw so result whatever why the piatlpit:ist Ow-
...
nourable Illembte . shoal& receive the Sliipert of:
house. , .: ,
Mr. BROUGHAM said; that his first °skies- as
to the present ease being e clear breach -et' the privi.
leen of that Haase was eery strong.' Bet be had
Waited to heat the opiates 'orhie Right Honourable
and Learned Plink (Mr. Wylie) who bad long be..
the sealoes defender of the privileges of Parlissneot
on one side of the Howie, and who. be hoped. wesid
now cooties* to be so on the other; and barker
heard all that thoJearsing of hie Right Honourable
and Learned °Poised could advance against that -opi-
nion, he dill feel it very considerably strengthened.
The privileges of that House were not to be rode over
by any regulations which a bench of Magistrates
might choose to adopt. If so. where would the prin.
ciple end ? Any act, however poss. however clearly
in violation of the law, if it had bet the sanction of

thwee Alagistrates and two Judges, the privileges of
Parliament must be set aside mod trampled Upon.
Another doctrine advanced Wes, that the privileges
Of Members only extended to the Post-office. He.
contended that the Report of 1735 was restricted to.
'the Post-office, because it wee a case where letters
had been opened at the Post-office which gave rise tout
it. if any ether ease bad Galled for their attention,
he was convinced that the great men on both sides' of
the House, Whig and Tory, would have been unsei-
, mons in their decitlon to the same effect. Hs shoulsl
be glad to know what was to asafte it a breach of pri-
vilege for the Post-office alone to epee liters of Mem-
bers of Parliament. Members enjoyed this privilege
in order that their correspondence with their Genesi-
toents and with the people at large might be free and
unimpeded; and whether that correspondence were
interrupted by a servant of the Government, or of the
public, in a post-office or In a jail, it was equally a breach
of their privilege. The resolution alluded to by his Hose.
and gallant Friend (the Member for Soatbwsrk,) was
not one which referred to the Post-office. The Hon.
and Learned Member then described the ease alluded
to of the Governor of Hatt, and contended, that the
general resolution then agreed to was exactly similar
to that now proposed by his Hon. Friend. It was no
argument against this privilege that it was liable to
abuse, becalms the same objection might be arced
against all other privileges. Privileges should be
judged by their use, not by Hocir abase. Natty of
the privileges of that House had been abased to m
shameful an extent that the abases would not bear,re-;
eital. A Member et the lest Parliameot had, by IlOr
shale of 'ltalia/dirge, redpeottasanypersoas to peso"
lef ret""11 so par 41, do lia Amide ever himposso
rty to a relation, sod' arta/ se this freeddleat
estaveyamea bad his •, 'be kept-Ilds person, tad'
many of Ms creditors to tke Primus he su-well Jr-
, •

NoPle •
reach o
haiku!

law

*Me it
sPonibi" I his
pbservatiot
Opted apes ,
,ceded dee settarlty of the re,* lon itilifel so by
ipotesi argoseiZt ,ottal taiga ittalesen if txtelartisarT
fibre.. The Moo. Maralmotbsewhaded by anietaisie "
Mato weeks, Mae jostles(' Dieting his own Jimmie:,
'citlei. tie order giros himh the Magistrates.
:Tie Illammese of LONDONDERRY would wry
"Wetly esplair ter engin upon which be should
Ara his vote. lie regarefeel the present motion as
'ihlsg two quiritimea, see of law. the other of priii.
lege. And Ii was to be observed, tbat if an! oilego
knows to the hews bad been committed, the fed i°.
if the House against dm modes weeded rot takeaway
legal remedy. ex lemma the punishment for that
lot".lbeesrfetibealhalli)reoetselier".6e74lll4lMiefriagiassisces'ilielirgiwasigliel:lottibcoirbieljegratniti"tillismallentssalicoatiehafdabiowrentureastails
sesfll:rthe:a(hliih:lite:Tx3l(l
es.*lli
sues.) bad heard the question dim:used, the weals.
tions of the prises altuied to were perfectly lett!,
and it would therefore not heeonse the Howe is urea
ride the law. Tfieninestion was, whether the Rim
,nould at that usemnent state its privilege so broadly
is to declare that ee.ty erhoner hall a right to wad
ettere to every Meen6e4ett Periliturat„ awl that every
Moniker of Parliament bail a right so seed Waste
ry prisoner, moil that 'Afro should be no right is
p;
one, under any eirrueistabees, to epee the letters•
f the House was to do this, what jailer "raid re,.
sure to open toy Irtthr at oft for the fitters?--(,fear,
a How was eery jelleg to lospri the bud writ.
gof the blenshers of that Mouse ? He really erred
in the rules einspielatil• ot ne 'auseesisary ir.
gement of the *object, air/ as RID/. mid he we
of that Hostreanod the primmereeiew the Mosel
niin.—(Gbeern froet the Dppoeitilitil ' He begged
that he usigbrept 6e mistme(irstoots" Airfoil/40'c
Home to Ise.opetitei-the he:ail:4 orafl 'complainr, if
01 real bead; fide . ittriermadist WOW Olt mot err
to lay dui/alba tb• MenitiiiVesw,ii
lralllikih sr Ilnitif foi i' they
red,.....,—,.,!paredirif4sg:firc.4l4B::ti.Liad . ihtn:
esclY:uirldas. v.': sot prepared
dell witobitege."l6l"lVl6l, Walla"
e
is of all 1.11.'1114164.74' ' Illiti litnilet)geS ' ad he
Mainly was wit sire of Obi I'o4l irttlele wield be
• iced by ate epioselary. enerripoudeiers. De was eel
Ong that I. elf gaols Inslial,Milliatle Ihe'jeilere
it
te.
oho letters of tits Meoshottrof that 1 it
/4 wield mitt tiliciakt)til tpotothai ralosA * eati6
tit,or
too hastily; ig4thl,woold therefore rein •tha re
lima of bk Right Hos. Friend. bees* ibectilmtoseer '
ploimed of, if offence it was, snit hump* pp,
tied before the eosperhat.ollosta:7lf iiitVol *obi
mem, whether theme mkt% which haabika .4,24 by
two Jot wort. legal or not; bewelirtaittre les.
pert he noedieposed-to push thie"bi I piivilegs
the extent Sought by tbe original. cooties.
r.
Mr. DENMAN; said, the Nettle' Martinets lad
tad ON Pretest, partly as a gentian of bait bit
fiat. be (Mr. Ii) 'thought was dee question the least
proper for the eoreidiestioo of the House. He whited
the Noble Marquess bad stated how the ease meld
really be brought before a Court of Law. It is a
question of privilege altogether. With respect to tie
trine of the Noble 11/ord as to secret co:responders
Ds Members, and into real boas fide grievaneecit
esiis
be evident that *lsere the grievance was real,
teas bean fide, the eorreepondence mast be secret.—
tit‘eilr, hear.)--Withoitt such a correspomietece, how
could the woret•of Nom horrible Bastile, the flames
jail have beer disarmed ? Whenever a complaint had
been made'apietirt• the conduct of that Jailer, wilt
reference was made to the regalations signed by the
Judges:—(Cheer.)--and what testimony was beret
to the banners conduct of that Jailer !—('Cbeeirs from
the Opposition.)--Yet; when inquiry had takso place,
it was diseor-red that sever had rates beep more in-
fringed than those' very roles, and never bad coodoei
bees worse than that Of this very Jailer. la messy
cons the doctrine of the Noble Marquess would err
the person complaised of the judge of his own etw
diet; for he might, of course, pot the letter, eos•
plalolog of that conduct, into the fire. and thus pre*
best Al inquiry.—(Cheers.)—This was not an gro-
mmet draws from the doctrine of the Noble Harsirs;
it was the doctrine itself. He (Mr. D.) highly re.
speeted the individuals who had signed the repils•
floss is question; but he was sore they kid
never contemplated the ordering of am thiof
whieb would clash with the privileges of than."'
Sir Samuel Itotailly was strongly of opinion crest
the right which had belie now aseume,}. He adoilwa
that the use of attempted subornation of perjr%
montioned by the Hun. ;Wernher (Mr. H.) was a ref
lend one; but the principle, if allowed, would also d
isrive a prisoner of the power of comosnokating the
tenth. sod of corresponding in eosfideoce will' lie
legal advisers. if the present question should be de
Bided sgaiast the privilege, there would be an eel to.
Lipower of the House to iftiaire into the abases et
a. Hail this principle been adhered to, ti.'
ntemnoas Rattles of lichester would never have be',
o
settee
irthincbr
hreaodul...ihrd
etnhocasecriperdacotinceatheorfeturaarere
bee
f 4
laboiiiiied. He could wit ad,kit the formed tbe sr&
ent, that there would be a di&ulty in the Jails
to
odetteking toillittinonish the hand-writing of 1/0'
II j. for tbo letters would of course go tbroagb 1111
rwet-Oiss. sot he then authentic ewd. He trwr
the Mouse emeriti me she neersoity, in the ?resin!'" '
dotes. of supporting its ON a privileges. Pritrito!
irrichntlight to be the happiest thin in theist
1"11110:4* wooogewi with the fertile(' of blieistera-:
tokens tsloiliellit ,Oppweitibn)--whea It was hill"
..X * * .
•

sothisir
about
ovredgir
.;;:no
Isola weesiand
,ticeyaorercad hirrbseeelei.inwrhli)etwasill:en,hirhillite:44":7:rit
, but the prae- Jocks Ba a r th. r •
between him • . .
! ' "41 If-OENBRAL * . ten between Members of poriiriorst „d the
i • *.
♦ o 1 neatest*, had and upon that growled esotended that* bre"oacliplecl
licationshontd •
to would gig, • privikgs had been twonsittaii. He felt an habitue!
itaidt rtedheminsaignil
astjaanand that
twatto would not haze
.dasiesuniair duty I!!!.• had "* 114.'4.higormatouci. 11:...440emlwealhi
.11114unsiminat. ""I7
all:
veneration for the high authority by which the rrici,
.dmastimat
robessesaimea.aidsma
.haetvitugsaimit7iiiir:lietai•fot.7o:
mita,
itas.hamihulowis:ailtairlihrtowere saoettiopeirmiemosed
aware of the of the fraokolit Plea* of hPalpor, rat
,Ater.•
Ntalr
bey were, they the operatioilif the Olsen rola, was edio eb t -rai tiaate W SIM opened ancept ascorbic',
s. -it was others Mettles amire ibto to isheliffits • itear:lgalablrlerlolllooll6 was libel bc, *taiga co too subjel. ,
c INISt
itthl ladtWlßC,Plabiebe.4lolllol 141 "elf to hesitate to giro his anscat, iyiniigoi‘ast
34.10-
rt 'oaf tae own part het.
haeortasmaalotyseildi.dforceitageitiontifitit th
thas'lroitorto ia
Ls "ma attar. what their franks contained ? It Wit 116dihit' h tee'sionallia.
was Lett ttrnillokoolocall".14.
wanasosori"es ke. ffal. . of justice.
hear.)-.4.111111 beware the asoins'of exibmtter "iittsethil ; , that
ioelhied to ho• pr6per is its intars and dabopis„ia i!atp
,h """
*J
leheetse aol, tic wane, lan fli,ftelaW it hem of vide‘ which @whit
ce of which he CPan'tb• epriasaosAiii4ga.ipase
,ammed. :wwharderss elinaatter:: ht. j°4lA7cir"l?'9l,l ree..BllHo"atoesd"Pal-thialite ithiesi"lnsegli au:4e° iihui;
he walftwratu theca was aothiack the
Parliamentary A. House. •
„i Ile. T.llfea WM., Pa • ! head Ilia a' saaketiaittWetior of the law, and
Reform, and for too tritercreises the
• . L.- Mr_ PRRI. had andarstaadi alba Hata. be" ParlhaWo4 imas CW"al" IN" ofreceded th...06.61..r. . -