The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-02-20 00:00:00

nut PRANCIS BURDETT'S SENTENCE. House which would expiate the Ciudad of his Ma-
VBSORIPTLONS for PAYING the PINS of jesty's Government with regard to Naples. That
09 WON. Imposed by the Court of Eism's Bench oe Sir paper was now before their Lordshigs, and be (Earl
Frauds Ihusiett, are received by the totlowteg permits:— Grey) was sorry to find it did not alftitil that satisfac-
mr. aimed Brooks, the Ttessaret, t In, &reed. tory emplanation respecting the prtidedce and wisdom
Mr. Nuicesbe, St. Peel's Church Yard.
Mr. W. essence, Blshopsgatemtreet. of his Majesty's Government in this instance which
Mr. Mae 9tin, 011erd-sirest. he expected ; and for that reason he propmed to move
Mr. A. 05,O5, rd's
et High Holborn. for farther information ; and he shodid, at the mums
Mr. as, let Jerses-street, Cermet Gerdes. time, make some observations respecting the affairs of
Mr. e, 79, omm-street, Soho.
Mr. Clman, St, Illoont-street, Grosvenor-were. Naples. After noticing the declaration Made iu the
And at the Crown sad Anchor Tavel'. hined. • 'Circular Nom of the Secretary of State, that Oa
sa• BobseriPtiens rwei"d is the C"oir7. are "lint" general principles it was not allowable to interfere is
--'.riled to the Treaseree, Ito. Screed. Louden. , the interim' concerns of other States, be must advert
',. to the monstrous enormity of that principle which
was contained in a paper coming from the Allied
Sovereigns, and first circulated at Newburgh, and as-
serted the right of interference in other Uovernments
is order to prevent any changes from taking place
therein, in case such changes should be hostile to the
notions, those Sovereigns might entertain of Monarchy.
It mattered net how usaniamas the people of the
countries were the changes took place might be In
brining them about, or how beneficial they might be
to their general _interests, becalm upon those Auto-
crats devolved the right to sit in jndtuent on the
internal acts of ether States, to pronounce a sentence
on any improvewents they might choose to adopt for
their own benefit, and enforce their decisions by the
power of the sword. This monstrous principle went
to the extent of dictating to all the liovernments of
the world, where any deviations from their notions of
Monarchy might take place. Never was any doctrine
or principle more intolerable than this. lint this was
not the first time the doctrine in question was asserted;
for at the time when the late Revolution took place
in Spain, a similar principle was asserted in a
Note from Prince !Metternich, and also in a
Circular from the Court of Russia. The principle
was still wore clearly propounded in an article pub-
lished in the Berlin Court liasette, which broadly
stated that no communication should be held wills the
new tiovernnsent of Naples, as that would acknow-
ledge the revolt that bad taken place there, and that
no change should be effected there which was not con-
formable to the Monarchical principle; or rattier the
notions entertained by the .%Ilied Sovereigns .as to
what that prinriple should be. If such a principle as
this were generally to prevail, the condition of man-
kind would then indeed be 'hopeless ; for no ameliora-
tion could ever take place except through the will sod
the favour of the beneficent Monarchy. Men most
hear every kind of evil, they must put up with every
kind of oppres.sion, and have no chance of condition
except that which came through the favor of Absolute
Monarchs. if his !Majesty's Ministers d:sapproved
of those principles to which he alluded, how did it
happen that they delayed the promulgation at their
sentiments respecting it, esti' the 19th of Jometery,
last ? Did the note of the Emperor of Russia, and
that which appeared at Berlins as well es timseieelarea-
tion of Austria escape their notice until that day'
They must have had information upon the subject be-
fore that time ; if so, they either did or they did not
remonstrate : if they did, what was to be said of the
boasted influence of this country, which appeared to
hare had no effect in charging the infeution of the
Allied Sovereiesie, thus acting in defiance of our
power; and if they did not remonstrate, he wishes' to
know what defence they could make Gor such a bane-
ful dereliction of their duty. Here was a paper
coming from Ministers on the 19th of January
only four days before the meeting of Parliament, and
if the principles he alluded to had been known to them
long before that time, it was their duty to have made
that declaration sooner ; but in fact it appeared as if
the paper bad been issued more fur the purpose .f
answering discussions in Parliiment, than of resist-
ing a principle, which they dares' net openly to avow.
lint he would ask what had been the conduct of Mi-
nisters before this time? Why they appeared as if
they were acting is unison with the Allied Powers;
for their refusal to receive the Neapolitan Minister is
this country was a eunduct which led to a suspicion,
that by their connivance they secretly approved of the
conduct of these powers towards Naples. Another
ground of suspicion was the circumstance of a British
squadron being in the bay of Naples at the very t 1
when an Austrian army was assembling on its free.
tiers. What was the object of having the squadron 1
there ? This must appear from what did actaally,
take place ; fur one of the British vessels nas tes-
ployed in the degrading office of carrying away the
Sovereign of the country, in order that, is obedience
to the summons of the Holy Alliance, he might ap-
pear before their tribunal at Layboch. This was an
act of unjustifiable violence which perhaps had
sever been exceeded by any other of a similar
kind, except that committed by Buonaparte . when
he degraded the King of Spain by summoning
him before him at Bayonne.--(Cries of " Hear,
bear.) Now with respect to the paper isstted b)
Ministers on the 19th alt. it purported to have
I bad two objects in view ; the first oaf to declare
. .
generally that an interference in the coseeras
Naples would be inconsistent with the fandauseetsl
laws of this country sad with the principles of inter-II
national law. In the next place. this state paper 44-'1
eland that, with respect to the particular case of Ns-
lies, the British tioverement expressed disapprohatios
eto to the mode sad eircuonstances ander which the'
iospolits" Revelation was supposed to bare been
effected. Now be would ask what right bad Minis-
lers to drill such a judgment as to the lUalilier
which that Revolution bad bees brought about ? -
they had that right they ought net to have earnind
it eseept epos the fullest and clearest infonaatiest
and why did they take upon themselves to judge with-
out sash information I • Had they any informatioe
through the channels of iudepesinet °oversees:ate'
No, but in the very outset of thole circular skirmish
they evioced an sagas partiality tewarsie the Allied
Soverelps in regard to the steps they were taking
against Naples. Thee the Miaistarcadmitird that other
states might have a right. to interfere for their ...,
security previded their Times were not directed to the
purposes of ogriadisenseat, subversive a the No&
. .

410.stias .
Kayos for the DVSTITI.I LKIP-
-110110 sod DONATIONS reedela at et BNNl-
,„orparr SINNER, oe Tbaredsy, the LAS ikty 411721112wY,
Ills.ll Orli High6"l .1. Rundle', Esq. ZS S •
the Deka of York. Jobe PAM. WI. •I I •
(14211•0111) ' Ald 10 0 K. Irosside, Fog. - 1 1 0
'T.tulleel of Livetpeol Join Smite. II 3
kV. rfi)B • 36 0 0 —lrlderionsmo, Esq. I 1 0
Lori . Sidmettls J. P. Aanusker, Seq. 11 0
(V. PI - SI 10 0 11. asidaales, Seq. 1 I 0
Lord Oessiugtoe (Nr. • Tbes• Timber, 10 10 0
P.) - 10 '0 0 Cereellesiloytkaq. 11 0
Wm, Wilberforce, Edw. &vire. 'Esq. 11 0
WI Of•P-) M.P. 5 5 0 Buineel BeeelOPek.
O. Wesson Tayler.• Esq. 0 II 0
yaw m. p. - 90 0 0 Dr. Dower - II 0
Mr. Aid. Rotbwell 10 10 0 J.T. Watts. Zsti. 9 9
Mr. Sheriff Withschild lliams 10 10 0 r. BOUtlit • 10 it/ 0
. Ro, H. Alexander, E. 3 3 5
- II 001 MyWs. smith . 11 0
W. M
yet - 20 0 0 Mn.s Merry - I I 0
'not. Blatloll. Evi• 5 0 0 Rev. J. Henderson I I 0
0
C. Williamson', Esq. 60 0 T.ear golly. tag. 6 6
)des. Forster - 85 0 Thos. Wright. Esq.
10 10 0
gderstrllorster,Esq. timbres Moore, Erg. 10 U 0
Ms. -••10 10 0 W.T.Robinscen• Esq. 30 0
Mrs. Ed. Forster, 650 T. F. Forster. Esq• 0
Mr John Wm. Lab- E. Fenster, Att. Esq. 0
bock Rot. - a 0 0 John Pieper, Esq. 0
Tat Rev. Mr. Wiz 11 0 James Soper, Eta. 0
Rev. JrAill Nottige 920 A. M. Causlend, DWI. 0
Mts. F. Dizon ,- 3 3 0 Thomas Witte, jut'.
kits. Coy - 11 0I Faq. . 0
3. 4 Clarke. F.sq: '2 2 0 John Hersey. Esq. 0
0
j .Freshlield, Fsiq. to 5 0 R. coletworth, Esq.
Es 0
,
w.,. vvm Wai
i. Esq. 110 W. tEs • 0
3 11. llcadshaw..Esq• 3 011 {fenny dierey, .
M So. Kent. Esq. V 9 0 Charles Dom 0
*, •
Jahn Woolley. Es+ 1I 0 Thomas Brown. Esq. 0
T..e True IFritoe A.Cltapensn. jitu•Esq. 2
9 0
0
N^espaper - 22 0 Capt. A. Chipman
ruff Ashmore, Esq. 111 10 0 A Friend 1 1 0
. 1 1 0
Er% •1• Illeullirwe 1 1 T. Hendersee• Esq.
3. 11. Capper. Esq. 9 9 U Thos. Dakota. Esq. V 2 2
1 ai4ii Tenn,. Esq. i 1 I`. Mr. Robert WO Mr. 1 0
tieorge Palmer. F.sq. 3 3 0 A Laity by Mr. Lead 1 1 0
:WT Woo: Potbor 1 10 I Rev. Jobe C.ollin 1 1 0
s• (701004. El- 10 In 0 ! Robert Briscoe, EA. I 1 0
10 10 6
%. A.tioldsmid; Esq. Vies, Roberts,`3 5 0
Esc
1,. Jo-.epit. Esq. 33 0 Robert Salton. Esq. ab 9
11. Elissos. Esq. 23 0 Robert Sutton,. just.
9 9 0
J. G:olien. r.aq. S 3 0 Esq.
B. A. lioldsettiniet. John Dutton. Esq. I I 0
Esq. - 33 0 1 Messrs. Pestock.
.1 .L. (loldsntid,Esq 3 3 0 and Ce. ........ . 0 A 0
J. Joseph. Esq. •• .. V 2 0 Mrs. Collet... • . .. 2 II 0
A. Joseph.. Esq.... 9 9 0 Tlins. Jacksoe. Seq. 1 1 0
H. Jokeplt, Esq.• •.. S S 9 B. Douglas. ft A.•• II I U
Lem Hon art, }".4... 2 2 0 E. Nora., E.g..... 1 i 0
MA. Itolomona,Esq.2 9 0 J. Fish, Esq ...... .
10 1 I
0 0
Judah Cohen, Eaq.• 22 0 11. (live, Esq. ... 0
Lewis Aron.. F:sq.. V V 01 R. P. Ciltran, Esq.. 6 6 0
H. hallo. E5q...... 9 te 0 Capt. Reinter. lt. N.
'II
9 2 0
R. itsplbael, Esq... 0 H. Ballard, Esq.• •.
I 1
A. Hort, Esq_. ••• •• OJ. Morgan, Fief.— I 1 0
M. A. 1.0. K•q... OJ. Pulley. Esq.. •• .1 1 0
J. Ltql. F. 01.. •.. OD. Rainier, Esq.• —1 1 0
.
h. Hart, esq.. ••• •• OJ. 0. Harris. Esq 2V 0
J. VAnovre. F.4q... OR. Harris. Esq._._•• 2 2 'ft
1.. Phillips, Esq..• • 0/ R. Sanderson, Esq 3 6
Hymen Coben• Esq. 3 3 0 M. J. Ilerts, Nag— V
Judah Cairn. Esq.. 330 N. J. Curtois, Esq 1 q
Anil. Color°, 11141... 330 J. Clarkston, Esq• I •
IL Clo:rehill; Esq.. 1. 101 A. M•Leary. Esq• • I 11
R.-- NI. 0wr0..... 1 10 J. fondue, Esq. ••• I 0
FA'. Warner. Esq.. A 0 to Jas. Moody . ' 0
T. Moody, Ki 11..... 1 10IJ. B. Moody, ..•
John Dickson, re4q. 1 1 0 I .
dobaeriptions sod Donations will be thankfully received
til the Treasurer. Edward Forster. Earl. No. 6. Ht. Ileletes
place. aishopstatr ; The Secretary, No. 30.11octoe-winare,
at the Estahlishosents, Ilackney-Road, and Holton. by Mr.
Abraham Tettel, t'olleetor, No. s.Carlisle-place, Lambeth
b'. Me. John Halt-hard, No. 90, Piccadilly: by Mr. XJ.
Steatich% No. 40. Pall-mall; sad by the principle Seniors
in Town end Country.
ROBERT CRolfelf. Reer—etiiy.
-- -'

-
WKNI El) isnait4li.itvly Seventy Hood TA 11 RO
WORKERS. May have constant entployatent. at
No. I. Gatos) -street, Bath-street, St. Lutes. Good priers
lilt"' •

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

}MUSE OF LORDS. MOSIDAY, no. It

Xr. Rigbum bronght up certain Accounts from toe
4:,l4loolosers of the National Debt.
Some Private Bills were brought up from the Com-

moan.'
bird FOLEY presented a petition from the inha-
Siiantiof the parish of Kidderminster, praying that
ntiassies might he adopted for the relief of the trade of '
thr ronatry. His Lordship presented another petition
froor the 'inhabitants of Croydon, prityio! that the
-tavis!a's name might be inserted in the Liturgy,
that ber Mainly might be reinstated in &Mhos' rights.
...Ordered to lie on the table.
THE AWED SOVEREIGNS AND *Ma.
Earl &MEN said he roe, in patient* et .the Retie*
..41kiid'given on a fornsi.r lay to call of ids Xajesq's
• Midden for sense satisfactory lefermatila
fan partthet had taken in the proceeding* that were
carried us by the Allied SovereigasloWards Naples,
ever Alter the affairs of that coestry Islas to suite a
hosiiik•fi+lirt7, in that most denim* 1111=
.cal)ed the Poly Alliance. It would. be
that, TheAtst day of the Seesiono he WI
" ireti •
. v, loodireet the emotion of the Howe to
alethisseems-
i*l4y:ang..witb that view haat asked ti
the 4°r-
le
*ahead (tithe Admisietraklo. as to
e/4a* el it ducamest parportisg to be the Declare-
iiiirfaibbsitllied !Mare. The Noble Sul thee alemer-
hkireedynatiefectory news that that abllFlllnear was
Bohemian" crweeet ; "Sib* esowl time tiloolaisell
he rebel- pviesiple of &Ay woe °oversew* bat-
- *A Tight etAterferestee in the 'simnel gaup
4elfai thaetherittete ; atibeitilt he shell adlibloi dog
Filigbi.be,eerteia eseeptiese is that rnitolpdit
1'414 et .;hg woe lbw the Neale Elbi!
be yeti& &stir ley Iwo*, Dien ale

.- -
totipi syst of Europe is, Mtablished by the late
trestles. The conduct of initialers in all these pro-
mediae was most extraordinary. First, they re-
fused to acknowledge the Neapolitan Ministers,
and, then admitted a right of interference
on the part of other powers. On what ground
be would suck, could they think of breaking off all in-
terwar** with the new Uovernment of Naples i No
new Sovereign was there to warrant such a change of
conduct; the King of Naples was still upon his Throne,
with the exception that he did nut exercise arbitrary
power. Was there any thing in the character of dial
Revolution that could warring such a change of COn-1
duct- Was a Revoltaon condieted without ‘i dingo
wed which acknowledged the King to be coasideiod
Onts one whirl should put au mid to all amicaule nego-
tiation and intercourse ? This country bad soma
years ago assisted in the establishment of a flee tio-
vernment in Spain ; we had afterwards seen that U i- 1
sentiment overturned by the present King of Spain ;1
1
ril jet ticat event produced no suspension of intz-r-
-aperee _between die country and the Uovernment so
jrevointineised. Why then should a political change
break MT the intercourse between one nation and an-
other? Unless it should be conteade.l ihat their was
one rule for a Government overturned by a King; and
another fur a Uovernment new modelled and improved
by the people. However, when he considered the hos-
tile measures going forward against Naples, and
coupled them with the declaration of our own Minis-
ters, the result was, that they admitted Naples to be
an excepted case, and were net hostile to the inter-
ference of the Allied Suvereiena, provided no ter-
ritorial aggrandizesnent took place. This doctrine
he opposed, as one leading to a system founded
on the conveniences by which a certain balance
of power could elfect, instead of the establishment
of principles of justice. And this convenient balance
of power was talked of by men who, to their eternal
dispel*, showed the greater part of Saxeuy t.. he
seised upon by Prussia—who consented to give up
Norway to Sweden, and who made no opposition to the
"desire of the greater part of Italy by Austria. The
erne principle upon which, in his opinion, the balance
of ponwr ought to he inaintaisied, was that preventing
powerful from, oppressing weaker States; and not
that of promotiog the convenience of countries already
aggemelined. it appeared then that Ministers ad-
mitted Naples to be an exception, and that the attack
against that country had not any territorial aggran-
disement fur its object. The only security that could
exist against the danger of such aggrandisement was
a strict adherence to justice and to the laws of nations.
Aestria was proceeding to attack that country in vio-
lation of all these laws, and after occupying it with
hit troops', what must be the consequence ? He was
sin iodated to hope that the Neapolitans would be
enemies
re:siantsiiteoccecuapgaatiinosnt
othfeNsaupplee-s
salel
powers.akoef athayeireffeceamtha
Ass Insvt. billow ; end what security then could we
lore iiirailit tr:reitorial aggrourlineimiat en the part of
Austria, en whose power Naples most be entirely de-
okoilant. Who rouid tell how far this principle of in-
jistitbe might extend, and what misfortunes it might
lead to throughout Europe. lie would place no more
reliance on any assertion or declaration of the
Austrian Cabinet than he %ritul upon a promise
egad* by the Bank of Vienna. Ira, it to be sup-
lewd that Austria, after getting possession of Naples,
7irsuld all iti a sodden become moderate awl just ?
No; they had all seen -considerable jealousiesand a prevail-
tug is the early .pericel of the Courederacy fter
`the seizure of Naples might not the next step be, a
NiHeinstel for compeusation on the part of Ressia, for
!the sweetmeat.. given by the Russian Cabinet to this
iset of injwltice. All the security then contemplated
by Ministers woolil be good f,r nothing. The State
paper, to which he &heady alluded, declared that his
3lajesty's Ministers hail acted with all possible ex-
plicitness.on this subject, as would appear from the
Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. Here their Lordships had
at instance of the *timidness of principle by which 1
.peace was to he preserved, fur after all the confereneesi
that had been held, the business at last came to this,
that in the nioiith of December, 1 &!O. the. Allied
Sovereigns put one construction on the 'treaties, and
the British tiovernusent another. Notwithstaailing all
the explanations that had taken place, the Allies de-
clared the interpretation of them to be such as to imply
an assent on the part or treat Britain to the projected
Interference in the hairiness of Naples. He denied that
in the case of Naples there was any exception to the
geoeraiptinciPle laid /town by Ministers. There wthere
as
note OF the ground of necessity, or before
could be any right of interference there must be a
real and not a remote and visionary danger. There
mast be one that should furnish a jest rrounil for
complaint ; such. foe intuere, is therm* promulgating
an intention to wrist the rliCalrectarrople of otkr
countries to °vertu; *sir goveriummlts.• similar to
4 decree peened by thf Frees+ Convention
Is -

might he advanced against every Revolution that had
ever taken place in the world. All the revolutions
which took place is the world were owing to prealone .
miegovernnsent, and were brought about by parties ;
and factions. Our own It'volutioo, which took place
in 1638, areee from the misgovernment of a tyrant.
and it never would have been carried wiiboat. a secret
combination of those great, good, and Mbutat** cha-
racters whose memories every Engliebtnan or the pre-
sent day ought to revere; for it was to them we were
all indebted to fur the liberties we now enjoyed. This
argument, Oleo, WAS most futile. With rasped to the
sect called ettrlmuctrf he should hot enter into any jus-
tification of them. He nwlerstood that they began in .
the year 1.,12; and that they were chiefly encouragett,
with a view of opposing the usurpationof the French.
But supiectieg the revolution to have been begun- by
Horse Z.tr by noy small party of men, it could nit ha
vitiated on 0 at amount ; for if the people corecorievi
in favour of each a change, it mattered not ley whom.
or Li Loa tuany persons it had been bruaght,ehput,-.,
Then 'levee ;rata revolntion effected in swore peaceable.
mariner. No aeisnositiec, no broils accompanied it in its
progress, or flowed from it after it was cotiannimated.
Stich oleo was the character of the ren'olittion in Spain,
anti yet the cir umstaoce of that country's •adoptiog.
a new constitution, did Not induce us to suspend our
connesion with it. In that country too, a hatinony
subsisted loon-reit the Prince and the people, such as
antler similar tic( ninstances of change had no esamplo
in the history of the world. It is true that revolution
was effected by u standing army. Whether that cir-
cumstance witald have the good coneeeneuce of lessen-
ing a lattiekt for keeping tap a standing military force
in oilier coontries, he knew not, but this conviction at
least it imist for -e upon them, that the tare incident
of soldiers beitsOoritied into standing armies, did not
and could out prevent them from having the feeling,
of men.—allear.)--tiod forbid that it ever should be
the character of standing armies, it whatever Part of
the world they were kept up, that whatever woe.the
extent of oppreasion under which the people suffered,
whatever the length to which despotism was deikrons
to go, that they should be found the cettain inetra-
moos of that oppression, and the constata ie-
fenders of that tyranny.—(llear,)--Ile hailed the part
which the armies acted on those occasion', .as the
proof that when they became eoldiets, they did not
cease to be men. It would afford a useful lesson to.
States, and show them how much safer it wive to
found governntents in the affection' of the people.
than in the strength of military forte. Thole
beneficent dispensers of good the Allied Powers of
the Continent,—(llear)--said indeed that tires... Might
he a certain degree of reform allowable iii states, pro-
vided it was not accomplished by a military ins:ru-
ment. They asserted that if the military had any
share, no matter how small, in any such reform, no
matter how meritorious it might be, still on that ac-
count Ain.% it was a change which was sot to be en-
forced, which must be reprobated ; and Rttlit it was
so reprobated, it should be conellered that legf;i-
mate Monarchy every where was insecure. Foch was
the language of those Powers. lint he would ask
those who supported, or who countenanced sorb doc-
trines as those, what would have beemne of the religion
and the liberties of this country, if the army of James
the Second had adhered to his fortunes' If ever the
principles of our revolution was applicable, at all, the
rase of Naples came decidedly within itt influence.
What was the doctrine of the Allied Sovereigne? What
did it amount to, when divested of all its pretexts.
but this, that nit revolution should take place, which
bettered the condition of one State, if by so doing it
had any effect whatever upon other states ?—What was
their language 7. " We will not tolerate freedom in use
own etatee, arid we cannot bear it in soar'." Forget-
ing the ptennises which one of those Sovereigns had
made to his people of a free coustitution—a ;mules
which to this hour was fatally withbeld..—(tlear )-
Forgetting this, and passing over the etertione which
they hail made to infuse a spirit of freedom into the
mitt& of the people of (lemony, when they h.d to
resist it foreign domination, they .even held this
strange and inconsisteot language --" We will not
allow you to wake any reform which orieinatee with
yourselves. Send therefore your King to answer be,
fore our tribunal ; resume the chains whirl; you have
already worn, and when you have dune so, be control
Useseeire such relief from them as we will to afford
yew" This crag the I vtignage of what Ite should ever
cell the L'it-Iloly Alliance. 'this was the . langnego
which the Uovernosent or this toncontry I, id treated
with their sanction and Cteat, but wch it was their
duty to have marked with their decided disapprobation.
The Noble Lord then to ide some obserratiosa vas
she secret 'nicht/upon the treaty Winer • Anstria art 4
%spies. By that article it was "an lerstorrl" Os
mae a courtly phrase) that the *big of the two Ski-
ties was te admit no alteration its his dominions. Is
as It rpsessssii. perhaps, whether, ht. an, fair eon-
' arikle - to -

4•n• .

by the celebrated decree pitied by th*Freacti tAnrcussou was a stuns... v.---E . . _
.....
,ve oil the 19111 of November, 179i1. An act of this igesetbosk-s6at veto, eo„lii beim/at lo oily to a
ire kited would bet jest 'cause of tar, if remonstrances tbaagiihicb ailed take placclwthe,ctatltsbUs4o3ant
of alai negociotioas failed. The right of interfereurethen, alb, liesitstisaw sjoeernateae . sas,a2 alt 'veto.. bo.
tsl be contended, must arise out of facts ; bnt the anjust apptpkendot that if that itytieli tette ill be &onside:mg
,er. and Inosstroas principle was never before admitted, that as a perpeniat ipaarantee pa ••tttip
.paill,9l- /he ICU.
de- a people making improvements within their- own against sail ilfroce as betty?* Alp, &Ad `leis awn pm-
a. country, and for their out beoefit, were to be at- ~it *As irAist ab i .ifiv..: piailt a: itie femme
ion tacked and 'suppressed by the fireiVlSlVarms- 11*k‘ 1140elling to the ' riei*Aile • hare willies
she worstrons avid info:mos a doctrine wats-Isi.. the titre of Natioos. r te4.llr. It was Kt-
gem &drilled by.say writer On • matiosal law:: ' lionemp rai—it was incaasis -`l.. wit.. • alibis ,iof die
nis. politass hal committed no irijafy, tow crinied any people, and it eaiiitated ... ! 4', -Soil Wit pejo&
rla beitilitf to giber States. All they bad done was, to pit which declared ths. . • . , lbw potria it
if litisit the prior of their IGng ; widths King caseate to ova sovereign to . • --. ofit ' ream sr
lard .' had 'bees OM- That wale what •Irite4l she vet" ovoid rout:Dui the •itdg , •". seed thvirtireet
rvk
which the.Soverrig , . it*. " :villOPC:010" 'ea; tames of the Allied Powers; and langleod soust with- io,parsaat, rights. - : 'tn.ti.
...a esti. will" dpe
t
risk.. f w herself Prom the dotir of reimoartristlng pitch coo-
ties : Thedip&racter of Ilse Restitution was given in (citing bia aunt f.., • - .` • Abe 4*.
Ms? . emote of Gifispo Chiard ; but the Allied sllweririses efficacy of sera 4 ~,,L,,* • ••• . ,_- '. -
seeb : two preteMo oa Use paned of usieroodart* their gnaw' lowa. • 1•11 .--' • --1-Te•-•
wed lag ; aid sitar they Wild tb4 Wititif wain *nu be „ •'''. , " .4.4 r. '. ci -ti! -ter
•
lii•ir ly and sot cif addisgreanuematd Primitli*ir lenani,Zr 1-..". c"(/ '..iL•c4.. -..
ober 'co. .11,hail bear said that !Ken; lasigiliiisie •. , .r. ‘,/,. • ‘;4. .;x ..., •iirt-Pi •
~. Act
ows .or pactilKll,pres who were
.nsaialy_lillelfiglaisl ..•.: c ''• 1 .si ',ll, la
(she latliPllt fist revolution. if tlinriliAkis, ail • .. : ' ..*-1.. . r'41';1,......47- 1'...
,10te' "4"al- -
limWYesJb . is. egia,.7. Alpetion, it was ate objeWoMbait asistastelt.. +.: '!-,... -A. •••• • if.'v . •
•.. • . , .. , •, • -.
‘
. .., ..., •.. . i
•• . .
. . .41- : ...." •- • • '- '- '''`•ti •
' •
; - ....•& ~, . . 4• i .' • .41 t
• . ' . -4 -.1
• 4 P 4 . Plf .40 *
.* lb • • .
. . . * •••• - I . 7r. .
: .