The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-01-27 00:00:00

-

''; • 74.,

(HIM ass .11100).—Itere set the words of the
set eiselly appliellbis to the one as the other ? Na had
*artfully perused the Ast of Uniformity, and he del-bred
kits his opinion, that the name of the one bo
out without that of the otbef. The Hitt
was, to unite the Church asttleattw
to alter any pert of the tin
et of Parliament; and theeefere there multi be ne putter
Ott suer the echshtedral part, hem* Sky erne both
together.- It was knows that Hill eta; Wes
Charles 11. wall Ike first object of attack open the
phociple on which her present Majesty bad bees es-
tailed. Bet that authority sob sot one which shitill
be dulled Imo operatios' as the act of expnnging her
Mae from the Liturgy, bad been followed by as eta&
rthe King himself, and was not likely to be cited
preeniest of any forte spew the pretest *cession.
It was the duty of Ministers to bring fortwanft If Writ a
thing were in cootemplation of the Crows, alt the evi-
dent', which went to establish the neerseltrof each 'a
plimmilllbsi hosed of doing Which, they bed pet In
met twist her a tribunal loch as had octet Wore
hoes rasoled to, except in the memorable isstasseof the
jeriediedidel lathe High Commission lours, which had
exercised a censorship 'norm over the Queen shunt, to
that which was now established by the Pricy Council.—
(Hear, hear.)—A case of this kind might certainly nem
Agnes savor t bat in deciding upon that indiridnal calk.
Sher Meuse was deciding upon every • contingeacilleat
might occur, involving the viestion of a Queen Cas-
eates privileges. They were deciding. If the event
ehesid-prove in opposition to the motion, drat the bathe
a a Queen might be struck out of the Liturgy, and that
she might bedegraded without a reference to any autho-
rity, but that which was not recognised by Liw. If the
eltee of the Queen were left to the discretion of a Com-
o Court, it was in vain to say that she was pos-
sessed of the indelible attributes of loyalty, abandoned
as she must be to the mercy of her reedlike. The
favour of a Court and popular favour Were equally
capricious, and those who would permit the pri-
vileges of a Queen to be so violated, were open-
ing a door by which the King might be disgraced.
Parliament alone was then entitled to the exercise
of the pewee to which he alluded in the case of the pre-
seat Queen, who had all through the proverntioe been
treated with the most extraordinary inhumanity.—
(Hear, hear,) He did sot here intend to iiddeei the
Mouse upon the subject of her Majesty's
jrosecutois
baring taken gloom themselves the office of adicial ar-
•easers and ioqiisituritl Joilgee.--(Lond cries of pear,)
ear did he Intend to ester at large upon the Swaim of
'eh's/ideate illegally•colteeted seder a secret commis-
hear,)—which bore .resemblance to no
tribe's! but the Star Chamber; but ever slaty be had
ascertained that this illegal cosine had been adopted.
he had bestowed incessant pains upon the subject of
the measures resorted to a gaisst the Queen. The Queen
had been cashiered upon evidence under the most dis-
graceful eiremumanees, and practises bad bees remelt&
to by her 'omits to pre vest her from entering with itp:
vantage epos her defence--a principle which went to' '
spoliate the rights of humanity. Now If thirflill came
down, which went to deprive Ilse Queen 000' dignity,
sad to degrade her, he should say, that tbolltahjects hid
already been Abetted by a system of prejndkation, set
up to poison ths public mind, as well as to strip her of
her rights mid pi/lieges. Combining all Him* objec-
tions with theirs:lZr of tine fact, that eyilat
out of let of the of 11 were Of opin en,
that the whole the proceedings agsliset Moe Qetten
were unjust end ishuseas = he owed sot but ditpre!nte
then with all hie might, in thaltbpe that Immediate
means would be taken to pot era *ad to a system which
had caused so much agitation.—(Cheers.)
Doctor DODSON contended. that the King had as
meth authority over the Church as the Pepe had exer-
cised before the Reformation. In the reign of
beth Hastrights of the Church, which had in tie, rein",
of Mary been given back to the Pope, were 'restored to
the Crown, and ever after, with very few ioterruptiouf,
',ionised with the Crown. It was, be declaned,
, bus to infer, that the omission of the Kist's name is
the Liturgy, might follow the omission of that of the
Queen. How could such a thing occur when the discre-
tion lay with the King hinowdL—(Hear, beer.)—Bat
the Hon. Oentleman's (Wetherell's) umoorchical love
was so great, that he was afraid to trust eves the King
with that discretion.
Sir J. NRWPORT quoted the Irish. Act
miry, as evidence to prove that the right to •
Queen's same from the Liturgy, existed in
alone. The Statute Law was, be said; as it step& see-
clusive.• •
The ATTORNEY-0 EN RRA I. firmed Is.,
that those who were dissatisfied with the net
the Queen's same had sot expressed that diesatielbedbo
twelve months age. The whole argument of t who
advocated the Queen was built upon the poi • that
the right of her Majesty was immutable; but the bad
not shown bow she bad any right of the kind. T e Act
of Uniformity gave no such right; and, notwithstanding
the appellation of Star Chamber which heal bees given
to the authority from which the wan had lamed, the
power that bad been exercised was an existhw legal
power. The law open the subject said the King bed the
power of "altering' the names is the Poem of Daimon '
Prayer, which included " erasing." At the time of
Charles, 11. there was no Queen I;ossert. The blank
was then filled up with the same of the Queen Cleerser.
Unionissions had frequestly tskaspleos. Is the Mg, of
George 11. die name of Passe Predsrlek, why h idlers
for some time prayed for, wan struck oat, and is that bt
Phillip and Mary. the Kidg was prayed for. awl sot the
Queen.--(Hear, hear, and cries of "Ehe is set ewes
Consort. )—No—she was Queen The
Forts of Prayer was " Pre lege littlisse.priadjaisa
nie. Not only had Kings impertoll
strictly royal into the Arm of "raper, bat signally ask-
ed the names of persons who had 6th prayed frt. Plena
the year 1714 to the proem, with witrioßtery istesp-
done, there bad been one ssiforea heading to the webs
is Cattail. Did his Honostsble sod Learned MOM
that the Coogan had coseelted

"14.
t
. 1
.
F :
I. 1
01
I
,I
. 1
. .1
I. I
I
f
I
f
1
. 1-
1"
i ' •
It .
I
t
E
t
t
t
B
I '
t
t
; .
. .

satPrAtchtagtolpgrlies•clah:2lr..."..lt?" lissalee . ,
said that the Watson of the *if* of
stance at all. Did his Hoseerabia sod I
'seas to assert that Omer I. weal, ell EsSellb sild pat►
pot*. divorced frets his wife ? If Akers* the ellek bib
happeoad it that she was always' styled She Dediese Of ,
Hanover ? He contended that Woe was Ise MOM of 4
inch a diverse I sod he would Amine try, lIPM whei-
ever might have hew the .erilest I ibi imam *lf
Omege die first. the low ass:isiroMN %qui.
jeer. If this woe a legal elgOrkgte Of MO -
Meet *as a mach estitled I f 011 Ike
most virtuoso Queen did hp aret 11111
the Ministate of that peeled hersisodelpubie , .. .
the embalm of her name deem oho ILltmegy,Oit •
sisters /Atha promo* day wore In •adviMait eho
of her prawns Majsmy's dew lbw Um balltaiiisid ,
Mambo, then amitedodi ONO theiVepar ll*
s.Cae to sonstien the Hitt •Obliiibe Wkm -
114 ittalawsall&b. 'IP"
albleligre"... sallielLeadlisdhasP Alsolo ir
air ille-Quilir Was saiiiied * Os "OW 4
tibia web" lotedied bailliblee* lb Mill
gree, 401111rasii•tryshedi•wmilijidisilimilitto
the to saVitiatimi• diode Okapi 4st 4, 0
10 1006-000.6" lad .4%! • .
, . dmikilkiir
od 4.6 *Hy t 141 orb *.
sat &r es
tbs ease, 1$ IltrlnsePliaMP; 44..- as.
(Hear.)—lt wee charged against his Majeft's
tars that tlasy acted is as I read 111111111 t. WSW