The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1842-12-30 00:00:00

I will tell you all when I see you.' I
I hope I shall as I pass (at half-past
Trinity-street)--could you any way

get out for ten minutes? and meet me (if you can)—but I
don't wish it without you could do it safe—but meet Mercy

) downri to

id if you don't come I shall go and
send her as I have said above, half-past seven to-night.
dear, you will now accept my fervent and devoted love and

sc are divided now, I pray God we shall some
day be united, if not on earth in heaven. How was it you
did not go to church last night ? I was sadly vexed; bpt
guess and I know why, and will tell you when I see you
(never mild), I can hear it. Once more bless you; Good-
bye ; remember me Forget me Not. Yours truly,
CONSTANT.

,elieve me who!
nd thong

and addressed to " Forget me Not," They ni
tone, occasionally interspersed with drawinf
of flowers and hearts, and poetry

bout twent

" Constant
all in the s;

for instant

Forget me not, though we may part
Perhaps, alas ! to meet no more ;
Remember that there beats a heart,
That loves you to its inmost core.

CONSTANT

In another part of the same letter the lady reminds the
gentleman that " her love is pot to be trifled with." In a
subsequent epistle, the platonic widow, after exhorting Mr.
Rowley to burn her notes, so that they may be safe and out
of danger, adds, " I would die to save you, for I do not blush
to own I love you truly, fervently, passionately, bat not
lustfully
On th

Ist of January, 1810, she serids him a Keepsake,
I by a letter, in which she admonishes him to
ow the dictates of religion, so that at the
me in glory." In the same letter the
the better of the religious, and the widow
thus breaks forth :—" I have kissed it (a note from Ronley,)
not twenty times, but twenty times twenty, how much vbould
I rather have had them from the writer, not the writing;
hope I shall soon."

The ex

Lets having been read

Mr. Bridges addressed the court, saying, that the facts
formed, if not a justification, such a mitigation of the words
used as to exonerate his client from penance and from costs.
Mr. Hartley on the other side pressed for sentence against

learned Chancellor then proceeded to deliver his judg-
, The learned judge having gone over the facts of the
is stated above, then said, that the words used were
latory there Fos no doubt ; but the question was, whe-
here was a justification of them. The Chancellor then
f the letters, commenting upon some of the fin-
ions in them, and said there were in all

read sor

or sixteen letters in the same fervid strain; and it was
able that any wife should see such letters addressed to
sband without being irritated. Whether any criminal
)urse really took place between the plaintiff and the
ant's husband he did not know, but looking at the

t for believing
Wai' this then a case in which a court pro
could punish the defendant for having uttered
Vol-cis that she did utter under the circumstances? lie
certainly could not hold that it was such a case. When he
looked at all the facts before him, there appeared to him to
be a justification of the v
dismiss the party froth t

The Courts of Chu
day of next term.

g used. I-le sbould, therefore,
uit and from all further con-

:ery adjourned on Friday until the first