The Statesman.
London, England, 1820-04-26 00:00:00

MUM.

SeAR Lk I T to..‘ r.l for is rush, to slmw cause why
a writ of mandamus should not issue to the Lord Mayor
and t orporation of Landon, co ttttt tandii.g ti•eiti to ad-
mit a permit& named Saul to the tree.kiti of the city.
The applicant wa-. a hotelier by trade, to wheit he
had served a re:Tulin apprenticeship, mud hail paid the
usual fees to the I. hanaberlain on admission ; and had
also taken up his treed ttttt in the guild of iii. trade, hut
the Corporation refused afterwards to ratify it, on the
suggestion that hr nas.cf the Jen isb persuasion, al-
though he positively swore that he was in fact a
Christian, and a Member of the Church of I.;:ighad.
lie itad commenced business as a butcher in the city,
and had subjected himself to an actiA fur so doing,
not beigipa freeman of the city, and a verdict was
found against

l'he COL KT. antler the circumslaneei staled, g muted
$ Ms to avow come.

OLD BAILEE RESVVIVS, Argos la. •
TRI UNT.
(Coitrirded from TIM inrrorty Am of yesterday.)

After Brent had finished his address.

Thr tut; vNA nos charged the Jury. After sammiett ep
all the es idenee, and oressiqually waling remarks upon err-
til n parts of it. his Lordship, in roaelusiort. 'hive his opinion
That the case fur the Crown was made net. and as no wit-
nesses were called for the prisooer, his guilt or ismoemwe
rested entirely upon the inferences which they might draw
from the evident-vs fur the prosecution.
Before the Jury left the Boa. the Format aslrl he wished
to pot a question to his Lordship. Their attendee had brae
calkri, uo doubt. through eoaseienthout teethe% ti) tee
Court, to the third and fourth counts; he wished to know if
these counts were proved f Did it DIDODni to a let ying of,
war?

The CHIII BARON " Most certainly."
The Juror said. he was afraid his Lordshiv did not natter-
stand him. What he • ished to si.k ans. wismoing that the
evidence did hear them nut in sitispo.ing that an actual
arminr. and a re-islet:re to the chit power. did take place.
did that amount to a 141. y lug of war
The 14111- rII 111)::. No, certain') ; not a resistance to the
ei%
The Juror. —But If there way an arming te make Ids 'Ma-
jesty (+tinge Inet.Art..,
The Utiat.r Min% that if they thosyrht the atuting
Will made uith a '.kw to compel .his Majesty to chance any
Measures of Government. it then annointed to a lessint of
war neuter the statute, and the prisoner was guilty of High
Treason. _ .

The Jury now retired, and in a few minutes returned with
their verdict of Codify, on the 3.1 and tilt counts, against the
prisoner. The prkotter immediately withdrew.
An application was then made by the Jury to know when
Moir attendance would be again required.
The Um. r It silo% said. that thic-e gentlemen who Isere
on ti.is trial need out attend again until Friday inornitv.
All the other Jurors were to be in attendance to-morrow
morning.
As soon as the verdict was recorded, the ATTORNEY-
OF NER 1, rose for the purpose of calling the attention,
of the t'iotrt t.. a subject which he had mentioned the
preceding day, and on which hr now•easne prepared
to schinit a motion to their Lordships : he meant the
publiiation of the trials of Thistlewood and Ines, in
Ilefillllre of the prohibition of the Court, by the Pro-
prietor of a Sunday Newspaper, called The Unermr. I
lie proceeded t. iedal too affidavits, one stating that
the deponent bad bought a paper so entitled of a per-1
son acting as shopman to 31r. Cleturnt, at No. 169,
*tritod ; the other proviug an examined copy of the
affidavit deposited at the Ntamp-Office ht 111 r. Clement,
as sole proprietor of 'he ()twiner, in pursuance of the
Stat. 35, lieo. 111. that the publication of the proceed-
ings of the Court was made with a full knowledge ofl
the prohibition, was evident from the following
passage, which he would read from the paper in tines-
:don :—" After the Jury were summoned, the Lord
l-Chief lustier said, as there are several persons charged
with high Treason by this indiettneut,whose trials are
likely to be taken, one after the other. I think it ne-
cessary, it: furtherance of justice, strictly to prohibit
the publication of the proceedings of this or any other
day, until the whole of the trials shall be concluded.
It is highly necessary to the purposes of justice, that
the public wind, or the Jurymen, who are hereafter
.to serve, should not be influenced by the publication
of any of the proceedings which way take place until
the whole shall be finished. It is expected that all
persons will attend to this ailnioniuon." Ile felt that
he was only discharging the duty which he owed to
the interests of public justice, awl to the dignity of
the Court, is calling upou their Lordships Iv punish