The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1842-07-05 00:00:00

hC SiVE

Bill, ind other

scion of the slave

le attention of the

om this country and
government would
given by the House

public works in

from any of th

amendment Bill

LONDONDERRY

of Commons,
Bill,

D be read a second

Tuesday week he

i of, and their lordships

THURSDAY

ies of the ratified trea-

VERNER, it was inti-

s no intention of in-

aooth this year

stion from Mr,

to alter the standard

of a silver one.
om Mr. M. Milnes

'overnment caused

on to raise the duties
1 wool. He had also
idor had received no

f the house to the pre-
he drama, as set forth
Mr. D. Jerrold, and

petitioners were,

TS, which was
Lblic and the

prayed that drama-
)s, more equal laws.
of the petition.

11. any portion of his

prepared

asure upon

py of ukases

d that Poland

said that in his opinion
A Russia to have acted

:hy for the fat

t every

I it was the intention of
:e the liberties of Poland,
could be prevented from

limited, and a sovereign

astice and policy of re-

was scarcely sufficient

uch motions as the

useless. It was of some

of the house should be re-
it was considered that this
h guaranteed the liberty of

in Europe could pre-.

sustained as Poland, but still
Id not ask for documents not
The riiht of

)r) of the house

s country arose from a treaty,

'e diplomatically

ich motion was

resent occasion. He
.t he could not think

land was

seat a gallant

art would b

hoped the Emperor
'oland calculated to
id to redound to his

d similar senti-

greed t

moved the fol-

house the

Greenwich sho

;3ducation, and that
ivally laid upon the
Lt present conducted

upplied, both in quali

instruction

1, that boys were

1 to be rieeiv.

arded the lower school,

quite correct ;

r school, which

conducted boys, who were a
ttention of the admiralty was
improvements had been made
d it was the intention to have
other arrangements to render
ible. It was also the intention
L inspector, and to have an an-

ithdrew th

itment of a select coon-

:rand jury

ord
_was pro-

led with grand juries i

a which his motion rested

LirroN, Sir W. So-

hich was negatived

disposed of, and the

-iIIUDAY

olse itself into

2ctions bill, the SOLICITOR-
-1 should be referred to a se-

bill into the most un-

ion was adopted, and

CHEQUER moved the order of
itself into a committee of

amendment, several resolu-
and extent of the prevailing
Lich the working classes had
eluding with a motion for an
that parliament might not be
in had taken place into the
view to an efficient remedy

motion, dwelt upon the
ire ; and expressed his

3e found in the removal of

s which were the original cause

w, and thought that very

required to meet the evil

a the motion

y one must sympathise with
`hat distress could only be
,cv which hon. gentlemen
He could not
t of those two who brought
As to obtain a change in
- t and if he believed
...,ficial, he would,
at once join in obtaining
iowever, that the effect
e would therefore oppose

.dulge in

,hed was to see

. .
is own principles—to see it
had already condemned as

liament separated without any

overnment would be corn-
;orn free of duty before the

leading to distress
ure. The trade of

ave been greatly relieved
nce, which had been so

nation ; hut its non-

ause of the dis-

not only the French,
markets were closed

anvinced that all the notions

,eting free trad

rid were repudiated by

le protective system in their

vas great and extensive,

xasiherefore of opinion

gued until they had

ry to ascertain what could be
it. He thought the govern-

,thous being prepared
is now bound to take

eminent had erred in makir

priniary, and its trade and
sideration, when, in fact, they
lave given a stimulus to trade
I their attention to the financial
en contended that government
brought forward, acted con-
iey avowed, and contended that
a corn would have done much,
ye the distress, which too on.
mows extent. The right hon.
uing an erroneous course with
al policy of this country. He
tse they might be made matters
foreign markets to our rnanu.

f this polic,

France

and there-

I government

therefore the

of this country.
considering the

overnrnent

et hecould
motion so

member , for

r period of the s

would r

be right to give

fat aey cotV gO * Itll-60%! ao tar httetfering eAiging
interests as to I to greater e4lls ; and in judging whether
thdy ought to bite gone further, the: }Aise i;:irtild du ivMI td
rethember the difficulties by which they were surrounded.
In conclusion, he condemned the anti-corn law agitation, as
calculated to disturb, to no purpose, the patience with which
the people bore their sufferings.
Mr. M. GIBSON defended the anti-corn law agitation, and
said he had no better mode of creating a public opinion
through the country, than by sending missionaries to teach
and enlighten the people. He would not say that the corn
- I laws were the sole cause, because there were other mischie-
vous restrictions, but they were, in his opinion, the main
s no intention, I cause of the distress.

Mr. Win:dams then moved that the debate be adjourned
until Monday next, which was assented to by Sir R. Peel.
The other orders of the day were then disposed of, and t e
house adjourned.