The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-03-10 00:00:00

Monism; paging nostra sapit.
th!r past relates to assn.—Mawr IA L.
Just riblialted. price 6s, in boards (Fifteenth Edition),
THE .EC IS of LIFE; a Noo-Medical Coriunen-
rim on the initiscretions arising from human Frailty.
In width the Pauses. ft% mptoms, and baneful Ellbcts of Lees
Venen-a. tionoriittra. Stricture. Seminal Weakness, Se. are
fully developed ; Part 11. contains some remarks on eer-
ta.n Fannie Coinplaints, in particular Sterility Part 111.
rnbrace. P•artical Observations on Sexual Debility, Self
Abuse, and Mental irritatiot, with some interesting observe-
t'"4 " vegetable end animal life: in Part IV. is a aeries! of
Lases idu.trative of the pre..eding ;objects, explaining
them rp n (an,;;;nr manner, and the whole addressed to the
Y oust; and Maturity of both Sexes. By GOSS and Co.
Conanaing Surgeons, London.
Xatura beatis
Omnibus esse dodit, gi finis eogooterit uti.—CLanntax.
Since Marc* to all the land gf bliss oupplin,
Its fraget application teams the Else.
Way be had at ;NI. Paternoster-env; M, Pell-Mall;
Piecadill% Iti, Princes-street. Soho; 12, Flimst-stroet; '
1,1., Fleet-street ; SU, Welt Smithfield ;1111, Climsapsidn, Lou-
don; Stevenson and Co., Barks and Co. Norwich;
B.
Threk, Ipswich; Barrett and Duffield. Blab 111101144. Br's'
tol; Hatt, Cambridge ; Headley, Lends; and al all Boot-
sellers.—Messrs. U 01414 and Co. an to be onernillall.' es
ental. every day, at their house ; and Pationta In tholGonstry
are requested to describe minutely tbo tOM, 81104.11111.
nottauce for Advice and liledicino, lid& ow be fomented
any part of the World.—GOSS alllll CO. K. LC. Ist'
pomp, 11, Bounds-street, Fleet-stew; Louisa.

- - as

of a gareittp he gate his vote; mamas ready at any
time to answer that vote. He thought, however, that
when this antititattee was allowed by that House, it
ought net, at mast, to be abused.—(Hear, hear.)—
He thought, tippestfore, that the tist of the votes ought
not to be false,Aselaving the-House of Commons to'
have voted on a'roposition which never was &nit*
ted to them, and exhibiting divisions of that House
under false colostrar-(Heat, hear.)—The publication
in which the breach of privilege of which he corn 1
plained was oestained was in The Morning Gimmick,
of the 26th February last; and the part he eimplain.l
ed of was the headily. tit.a list of Hon. Memb :1
who bad voted.% to the (*Hewitt' effect:
" list of4b•-66iooriey who voted on Friday last, the
23d, Tor haring the•Petitlon of Thomas Davison read,
before it was rejected; and against Lord Castlereagh's
admonition to the people of England not to ttoehle or
take np the time of the‘ House of Commons with their
petitions."—(Cheers from the opposition.)—He was
surprised to hoar those cheers from the Outdone° op-
pooite.—(Cheers from the Oppositioa.)—He could
scarcely conceive that it was in the Honer of Commons
he witnessed such conduct. Did he unierstand Hon.
Members to meat. by these cheers, that this was no
offence ?—(Contimmed cheering from the opposition.)
Under those cireuumstances he would refer to the Jou-
nals of the House. He asserted that there never was
submitted to the House on the occasion is question,
or on any occasion, a proposition such as that stated
to have come from his Noble Friend (Lord Castle-
reagh). It required a bolder man than the Noble Lord,
or than any one then in that House, to make such a
proposition in the five of the House and country.—
(Hear, hear.)-11 was a libel on the House of Com-
mons, to say that it ever listened to such a proposi-
tion--a false libel ! For, If there was a Minority
against the athommition, there must have been a majo-
rity for it; and he asked, who were that majority ?
(Cheers.)—He ch.mllenged those Hon. tientlemen who
cheered on the opposite side, to say. It was too much,
that libels on that House should be published ; but it
was insupportable, that when they were brought be-
fore the House of Commons, that a portion of its Mem-
bers should cheer.—(Cheers from the Opposition.)—
He would repeat it.—(Contiuued cheers.)--He
would still repeat it.—Xlieets.)—He appealed to the
Chair whether, under the circumstances, he was not
entitled to be heard. He bad been long enough a
Member of that House to know he had a right to de-
clare his sentiments. He could assure the Hon. Gen-
tlemen opposite, that their cheering shonid not deter
him from pursuing his intention. 14e had as gr:at a
veneration for the Constitution as they had, and he
wonillegain say, that those lion. Oentlensen cheered
is these; they meant to Inert that the statement in
this potter which he had brought before the House was
true. There were the Journmis of the (louse to refer
to in refatatimt of that assertion. But if even the
Noble Lord (Lord Castlereagh) did say what he was
charged with, that paper had no right to charge it
upon the whole of the majority on that occasion, with
having voted for an admonition to the people of Eng-
laud to leave off petitioning that House. If every
Member were to be chargeable with a concurrence in
all the expressions used by those who voted on the
same side with him. he did not know where it wontd
end. He should not have taken so much notice of this
eircumsoreice if it had not been for another gross libel
of a similar nature of more recent uccuteerree:- He had
not, Monett been present at either of the debate' or
divisions! but he called upon the Hons.: of Commons
.to ***edits privileges, especially of er what ha] passed
since he rose. He moved that the part complained of
be read by the Ckrk. This baring been dune, the
Hon. Member moved " That J. Lambert, printer of
The .Vorildiatt Citrosiok, be ordered to attend at the
Bar of the House on Monday neat.
Mr. ItENNEYT expressed his satisfaction that the
Hon. Welber for Yorkshire brought forward this com-
plaint himself, for the last time he bad read any thing
reflecting on the House of Commons, he had left it to
another person to make the motion. *Therefore, with
what di-Eretion the Honourable Member had departed
front that course on the present occasion, lie left to the
House and to the country to judge. It was gratify.-
ing, however, to see that lie had plucked up courage
enough to do the business himself in the present case.
tit was iniporsilde for him (Mr. B.) to say. whether
time passage which had been brought before the House
were tree or not ; but front all he Is ,t 1 heard, not hav-
ing bree'present, he must say that he believed every
syllable of it to be true. Ile meant that it was true lel
substance, for be believed the declaration of time
Noble Len] had in6neneed the votes on that cue/time.
The Hmiii. Member said, he did not disapprove of the
defog', and the list of vet s being published. If he
bad, it certainly would have been strange, for it had
been the practice for upwards of a century. He had
looked at the journals of Parliament, and found that
these tan, were fleet published in 1703 of the House of
Lords, and in 1714 of the House of Commis,. The
Hon. Member enumerated several early cases in which
these lists were published. This was the first time
that any complaint had been made, and it was now,
he thought, in a particularly doubtful case. The Hon.
lieatlensan was warmed a little himself with his sub-
ject, Mid was then surprised that (gentlemen on this'
side of the House did not participate in all his views.
For his own part he had nothing to do svi.im the pub-
lication in question ; but from all he had learnt, he
was Witted to say that there was nothing but was true
in it. Whether it snited Gentlest*, to disavow what
BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. became open to public view, but which they were
Mr. STCAR I, WORTLEY said, that he now rose not ashamed of doing in that House, was Sa-
too aised
call the attention of the House to a breach of its
Hentli emq
eestion. Heu
refused towas
not
hear pet all
titionssurpr when
read, that time
privileges, of the grossest nature. They all knew that
which took plan lie
by mime means or other, the debatesplace felt ashamed of the truth going into the world.l
is that House, were regularly published; and alio `-tholght the Hoe. Uentleinan was very discretely put
that, from time to time, by stealth, the majorities and *forward on the present ocensiOn. because it came quite
minorities also found their way to the public. He impartially from hits. astir was not one of the party
(Mr, S. W.) was one of those that did not object to who refused to. bear the petition read. lie scar;,lly
I this; for be thought that 11 constitutionally • know how he amid to meet the gaestioa. As be did

•
see any other goers, left to him, he should am.
adjournment of the House.
Mr.t. LOANI defeaded his Hon. Friend, the Mem-
ber for Yorksitire. teem the imputation cast upon hits
by the Hon. Oestiereita who had just sat down. With
reference to the Hon. tientleman's iesinnation, that he
had " plucked ap cottage," be most Say that he Aid
not think there was any Member is thit House that
'did do his duty more fairly or propey`m than his Hon.
Friend.--(Hear, hear.)—With revel. t to the Hon.
Gentleman's remarks on the warmth of his Friend, hr
did not think it came well from him ; he respected the
Hon. (tentleman, because he thought he Italiv was a
serviceable Member of that House, but if he was
exiled on to select some one remarkable for rnol and
dispassionate discussion, he certainly should not pat . .
his hand apoi the Hon. (letatlemati.—Mear.).—The
Hon. (itmtleman bed given them a vi.a..troa of ini
publication of the Hit of 'rites; but he begged Witt.•.
mind hint that that *as not the qutestion. Illtielptest4
tion was, whether it was jitstifiable for the poisßeittten
in question to assert that a snajnrity of ti.je.flonie bad ' •
voted for what they had never contemplated; eine* : ::
shut out all petitioning whateyerfrom .t'oe peal, le of
England to that House? His
.Nohle Prieto!. titre
absent, (Lori' Castlereagh) he well knew -had been re-
peatedly charged with haring expressed seatientats to
that effect, but he had as repeatedly explained. and he
bail t'• tight to time entire satisfaction of die Ilouse.l--,
He had clearly evplaiimed that his meaning was that
the matter of a petition was as much to be takes ion,
c.msideration as the manner in which that Killion ir?...t
worded, and that Hon. Nletelmers would do well to ml-
reonish those who olereol their Petitions to present to
that House, that such was the duty of the noose. •
Sir ROBERT WILSON hailed the eNplanation
which time Right lion. tientlentan oprosiie had jest
taken such pains to give them, as a happy omen of
improvement in their manners. It seemed in say, that
they were inclined to care a little more ...bout public
opinion than they used to do. But he wished to re-
mind them of the conduct thoew pursued, when that
most dagraut libel front the Presbytery of Latigholotie.
which was printed in the King's liairtto., came under
discussion. He begged Gentlemen on the other ride
to remember this, anti, as tl.cy were powerful, he hoped
it would incline them to skew a little inoloolgen, e on •
this occasion. He did not mean to justify the charge
of the Hon. Member for Yorkshire. He considered
the heading of the list in question to be irregular: but
he hoped the Honourable Member would withdraw
his motion, being satisfied that this conversation would
operate as a check upon the otfeaslitig parties.
Mr. CREEVRY observed that there seemed to be
no objection to the first part of the heading in sues.
lion. With respect to the second, he had hem' the
Noble Lord admonish the people of England. Ile bad
certainly given various explanations, and be (Mr.
Creeveyy believed be did *l4 orrieus4 mean what he
said: but he certainly bad been guilty of the Worts-,
cretiou of recommending an admonition to be ti' en
to the people of England not to trouble that House
with their Petitions. He thought this a very proper
topic, as long as there was a press in the country, to
he animadverted upon. Supposing the printer Ito 1
been incorrect in his apprehension of the case, wlii..h
he asked, was the most venial inoliscretion—tioat of
the Noble Lord in that House, or the printer's' Ile
(Mr. Creerev) certainly mild vote against the doctrine
of the Noble Lord. If the statement in question had
gone on to say, that the Hon. Member for Yorkshire
voted against that doettine. there might he some rause
of complaint, but, as the case stool, he thought the
expression lOo•tritling lo• be' gtat!); • &lite be 4ba _• ,
House. •
1 ' Mr. WALLACE did hot 4ee how the tuttbnl •of tit* ' '.,
statement before the Rollie, in linimiderritiog .Aposi..•:
.. •
the indiscretion, as it was called; of the Noble. koitml . ~,.
could br justified is casting a rots had unwarrantable -.1.
imputation upon the House of Cominbns. He WaS not .....
one who regretted Ibe • list. in question bay•ing heeo:.
published, or any fists of the same deseriptiod ; for lee'
did not think any one worthy of his situation in 'that
House who was ashamed of having his condert
.pab-
lished to the world.--(Hear, hear.)—He thongitt!'th..e, .
printer, in speaking of what the minority' had done,—
cast a gross imputation on time Hobse. lie denied the•
interpretation which the Hon. Member who had
spoken lisT had given to what 'fell frum the 11;oh1e ..
Lord on a former occasion. He would give HD .00;11qH.
as to the course proposed by bit lion. f rieipl , Oar',
hint (Mr. S. Wortley); but he certainly agreed wild.
him in the view he took of the publitation,.
.:
Sir J. NEWPORT admitted, that the Noble. ford
had made those exploitations of Off litrellliOnl reilk•
which be had been charged vilifeb' eitidd 'eta fall fat
satisfy every one that be bad used
.them inadvertently..
A very proper 'Hagen had been made to a gross libel
which he (Sir.J. Newport),bad brought Ist-fare tbo
House, iu time case of the lAfigholme Presbytery i• 10d
he begged the House to remember that theft' was a SW
teriel distinction between the two cases. In the one
case it was the venial error of the Printer of I nettle-
paper ; and In the other, it was the deliberate libeiratf
the Secretary of State, who was sapposed to reed (*lv
.Address that was put into the Gazette. He did• apt
think the present complaint was brought forward in a
very wise way, aami lie hoped it world not be pursued..
Sir 31. W.RIDLEY lose to advise his !tea. FAO
to withdraw his motion. He assured his be ditkApt
feel the slightest approbation of the article in O 0%.
He was not in the House on the occasion of the deirde
referred to. Had he been, be sboold certainly have veld
with the minority. The whole treatise Wham the
House was respecting the putting a title to certain ADCS-
Meta*, and he did think, considering the urgent begiries
which was to be brought forward that nioht, his ttasa.
Friend would exercise his beet discretion in withdraw-
ing his motion.
Mr. HUSKIVION observed, that even admitting Ike
printer, as it was urged, to have mistaken the grime&
upon which Hon. Membem had given their votes on the
occasion is question, it ought to he is the siteeelkiiiim
of the House, that it was sat reviler, even in tie Name
to ascribe motives, still lees thee was it *aidable po 1110
so out of doors. He maiataioed that by in,limitikt
"erg&
the article in question. asserted that the enajonty
l of tits
House had voted for an admooition to a 4 f
England sot to tratsble this Hoye with on, tr•
was present oo the oecainua when the . allie 110•41‘ was

; that it woo comatittition-ally • kosw BOW 10 wen _
•
•
•
_ .
•
- - -
-
-