The Statesman.
London, England, 1813-06-29 00:00:00

Wit before
tOired C
irsioo
AT

4 rift.thit
inacter ;
knew of
.on. It would
had had no come
4th of April ; btu
the publititiun ;
with her,--lf
hat necessity
ity for a rect
or Lady Percevi
l'sltion of the Col

bad alias,

that
she

pin rise. It
'vindicate hiemelt
u the forger of iettays wader great names.
• Mr. Cu nwoon followed us Um same side, and said,
that as Mr. Mitford was the authorhed agent of ',lily
Perceval, and stated that the documents came from
-her, the Defendant couldluiietto doubt but that the
-docurnetits did come from her. From speaking of
the madhouse, it was clear thnt she was aware ~f the
consequences. There was a clear motive ;it.) WI
1 Percevat shanld wish the establishment of the Princ•ls
1 of Wales to be increased; but he would not 'utile
on that part of the subject.
LordEt.t.Essoacinan.—The less RIM on the tea.
tlvi parts the [Mier. •
Mr. PARK, on the part of Lord and 1..* Nee.
val, said, the affidavits were ut en amter, 144 t 44s
application, as his Clients had no :opportunity
,to
answer them, and the publication watts** deuled.--:.
The publication was undqubtedl ithilloav and' it
was nectitsart to go 'hellsinn tribunal :in order ti
have Me. MitYad 'Witted. •

Lord ELLENBOROUGII.—You can have that bt
the Way Of indictment as well as by the preseut ap.
plication.
Mr. PARK said, be would show, by decided cases,
that the Court will interfere on such occasions. It
was stated, that the Defendant only published a pro-
per statement ; but he would ask if it were a pro.
per statement ? (He then read a long paragraph nut
of the News). At present it was affidavit against
affidavit; it was impossible to say where the truth
lay. lie cited the case of the King v. Lynn, 2 Bar-
nardiston, to shew that the Court would grant an
information, although the charge'was denied.
Mr. Justice BAILEY asked, if it wete not in a
better book ? .• •
Mr. PARK relied on the good seuse.,l4,lhe•vase,
not on the authority of tbelooX.
Mr. Justice Dastrice.—Lord Minsletdittid ther*
was not a •Single Report in the book Correct-ill •
through.
Nit. PARK said Lady Perceval had sworn that sire ,
was mot directly or indirectly concerned in the pub-
petition, and this affidavit was written before it could
be known what would.be sw.oru 9a the other side.—
To prove that the Court would graqt a criminal in-
formation, although the charge was denied on-the
'opposite side, he cited the case ales v. Sheep, An.
drews, 384.
lirt, Justice Banc' said, it, was only the Defen-
dant';_ own affidavit„
Mr, Parta,--There has. been no opportunity to
icoiltradickhlr. Atitford's affidavit, and the gravamen
iwas the puhlication as to the motives of the parties,
he would not go into them, particularly after the hint
`his Lordship given.
Lord, PLLENEOROUGIL—I recommend it to the
'discretion of the Advocate, not to go into the col-
lateral matters; but do not let it he said, that, the'
interests of any individual were compromised; in.
consequence of, any advice of mine : yoo will useyour
own discretion.
Mr. PARK said,
.there had been no opportunity to
contradict the statement of the opposite party.
I Lord ELLENDOROUGII.—Do you wish an oppor-
I tenity to deny the letter ?
I • Mi. PARK said, he could not deny that the letter
was the hnnd-writing of Lady Perceval, bat it might
be explaitted, and. for that reason he wished it to ha
put in way of investigation.
Mr. HoLe followed on the same side.
Lord Ewen no oovon.---T h e Court, by refusing this
application, does not abut the door to.the party com-
plaining: If she wishes, she may apply to the paper
place for redress ; she may prefer an indiamect be-
fore the Grand Jury: the decision of this Court will
not prevent her; but the Court exercising that dis-
cretion, which it applies on all occasions, thinks
that the present application ought, to be refused.—
roe eat , own part, I fogad myself on her letter,
whirl,- jilt my opinion, repels bet from any success
in tits application she has made to the Court.—Mule
teased. ,

AS, whales q 4 feet.. 6 inches in lebgth, and 17 feet
inches in diameter, was .killed and brought on shore
at Maycook's Bay, Barbadoes, on the 10th April,
being the first fish of the • kind ever seen neat the
island.
A very large quaptity of bones is annually col..
lected in Norfolk, and exported from Yarmouth to
distant counties, where, ;titer being ground or
crushed, they are used as manure by the farmers, at
' the rate of trona 60 tq Bd, bushels per acre. At
Worksop, in Nottinghamshire' .50,0001. worth of
bates ore annually sold at tts. 2d. per bushel.
ExccUTION.--il'liki24on, Yartoovd, and Bitrgeis,
the throe men convicted at the last Cheste As,i2t's
lar a rape, were ex.eno tett ,there on Saturday. Thei
declared their innocence. ,tolhe last moment, as t:.
the use of foroiblelagyfoso. About 400 flatten, their
eenarades, attendetl; 40, after the wretched nlea
ware cut down, contegred.their bodies to Northwicl,
tci be interred. •
At Dstwlish, on the 20th lost. In th* 4Sd year of his nge,
T. Barker, lisq; son of the tier. F. B. Barker, Rector or berth
Clttovit„
wn, p.
J. Hee nt Etwi. of CCeindry.
_• He was yottned Welker a
the hate Sitibti Lord Vitronat Lifted, fonsetly Lora ohaacct;
tor of Ireland.'
Oa the 17th Itr4. at Whitby, in Yorkshire, iged urntartis Gf
100 years, Mn. andrerd, relate of ittnlyertl,
us TitsnAtaper of Gibraltar, •and of the datt•tiagmeot
Voot.
On the 24th inst.., :4 his, rood core" Clith
s in colta:Oliero S'r
C.Vnilwajle_j4__y, t±!11±r.22::=2:272.1=...5p.

• ''''''7777-77''.
LONDON: Printed and Published by Dxt
. Lnr.t,; 111 "
lira•rienvn Oilleg. S., rivets:4-M.

, •
;,..7.•—zsz------4-...1zr.-.4.41.,•47....,..,_, „ . ..., 4.
'...,_•._.„...2_3.4.e.,.er,___.__,,::,
rays been considant, and persisted in
re several ons.l
,Copylet.eln this was the ansvthr_
, ,'..., •
I 'that( Loro rpi'diecld thhilek' .1
r Ito 'Michele' liket"rttle• It *is liir "..
plsill
Ifiei 'pert' ; df" Ladja Percent to deferet, : .
but- her. eoudect .was. denionstratiser•
of those letters. befese,•theii publics.a
ippear from her. afgdavit, :that she
imunicallou with Defenilant till the
ut tie on'tlnteddy /dually transmits
;. and if the (ether's *ere .not connect.
-if she, •were perfectly. innocent,--
for •A' conference, •.. whet, meet.
nifieation?r—There was: no proenca
!sal to ask for the parliculay intent*"
ourt, in.'s matter to vibich she hut
was the duty • of the Defendant toe
lf, othen.stise he Would he considered.