The Statesman.
London, England, 1820-10-12 00:00:00

Lord FtLoot:Tn.—Ton have stated that you tow Lord Eidansonoron.—What was the supper hour?
her Royal Highness walking arm in arm with Bee- —There was no fixed hour. It might be ab...ut eight
gawi at the Villa d'Este, ware they then alone :---1 or nine.
have seen them walk arm in arm in the garden. Am I to understand that you did not go into the,
Was any one present at that time ?--'-1 never revel dining room after supper, unl.-ss going on deck ?----I
feet seeing them at any particuhr time. bad no occasion to go there, unless going on deck.
Are you positive that you saw them so walk when What was the latest hoer of going on deck?--1 can-1
Bergami was Courier ?.---1 do not recollect having not say exactly.
seen them so walk when Bergami was Courier. Did you ever enter the dining-room, after the tent
Then yon are not positive that you have not seen was closed ?—I never went into the dining-room after
them 5o walk when Bergami Was Courier ..--1 do not the tent was closed.
recollect having so seen them. Then when you said yesterday, in answer to a clues.
Lord HOOO.---Did the Baron Ompteda dine at the tion that was put, that yon saw no impropriety iii a fe-
Princess's table at Milan ?----1 think he did. male sleeping in the same tent, in consequence of the
Did be at Como ?—He did. arrangemeots, you are stating facts on assumption. of
which you had no knowledge. [Here some conver.atiou
Did lie at the Villa Villani ?--He did. WORN and some previous questions were read layer.
Did Moped wait at the Princess's tab.* it all those Have you any personal knowledge of the hatchway
places ?----Ile did. and door being always open from the time you left the
By the Duke of ATNoL.—You have said that you con- dining-room, until you returned ?-1 hare thorough con-
sidered it necessary that some one should sleep ail leo( It from seellyi it Open. when I went up.
the tetrt, and that slat swre on - thou albs a male an - stein la the diming room on the Tome from
ant, did you ever express your opinion of that necessity Java to Syracuse e—l do not know ; I hove seen a bed
to Ilse Princess 7.--No. there chided down, bat I have never seen any ease 'Jeep
You have said also, that there was no mystery or con. there.
cealment when Bergami slept under the tent ; you have Where did Moped sleep?—Down in the hold.
also told us, that on one occasion of your going op the Did Maoris* Garry continne in the service of her
hatchway you found the tent closed ; did yea think Royal ffiginafas after the time you saw him en 1.15 knees?
there was no mystery in that ?—When the tent was —He did, &II the journey to Vienna.
closed, her Royal Highness had retired to rest. I cot- Now long ago is that ?—lt was in the heginninz of
tainly thought- there was no mystery in it. November the circumstance occurred. In the March
Was Bergami under the tent at that time ?--1 don't following he left the service of her Royal 11;gh ne.s.
know. Why did he leave the service ?---He ma+ lent as
' Have you any reason to believe he was not ?---I have courier to the Margravioe, the aunt of the Princess.
never thought upon it, and therefore have no Was the tent closed duirng the time by the order
reason to believe upon it. of Count Schiavani ?-1 don't know.
Yon have told us that you thought it necessary Was it completely closed during the day-time?-4
some one should bleep under the tent, and that person met ny.
should be a male. Did you consider it necessary that Will you take upon yourself to say, that a rerson
some one should sleep 6(.l°sr the tent ?—1 never "tee.' who swore that it was so closed. would swear a false-
mended either one or the other. hood ?--I cannot answer for any one else.
You have said that yon considered it necessary Lord Oath.---Did you ever see it so CIO!ell during
some one should sleep near the Princess ; did you con- to b_ _lt lay. that any one passing, might see distinctly
sider it necessary that that person should sleep within
what mat within ?—No, I did not.
the tent ?—I never thong:lit of it at all ; but I sup- The Marquis of WlLTsMilt.—itre you quite sure
pose I thought it was neress•il y. that the hatches were beneath the tent:—'l omy know-
, Was it for the safety of her Royal Highness that ledge they were not beneath the tent.
you conceived this necessity'—Her Royal Highness you mean that they were not beneath the tent, or
thought so, and I never thought otherwise. that you had no knowledge of their being so ...—i had
Having told us of this necessity ; and that you no knowledge of their being so.
Lord aloe.—Did yon write your own challenge
never communicated your opinion to the Princess; am bathe Baron Onipetda t—l did.
Ito conclude from that answer that her Royal High- Was it In your own composition ?—lt was.
ness communicated her opinion of that necessity to Pu you understand French ?-4t was wr:;tcn in Eng-
' you ? HA.
(We understood the answer to this question to be in Did you make any copies of it. did you give copies to
• the affirmative ; but on account of the noise below the gth7 lotto ?—I t°4 no copies.
Lord PIAWSOIOI.D.—Iv as tnere a companion to the
bar we did not distinctly hear it.) belebes P—There was not.
1 You seemed to think this necessity arose out stow Then there was no protection to them ?—There was
siderations of dancer relative to the Princoes; Whet mt,
was the danger which you apprehended?---I don't Moodie test of the suite in the habit of using the
know that there was any immediate danger. hatchway in the Jay time 7—They were.
Then as you state that it was not in consequence of Lord finosvescon.—. If her Royal High rirt s lisd done any
rant danger
tiling so outrageously Indecent as to be seen hi' the ni,-
ter and Mate of the kissing and embra.-ine Her-
Me. lin ovc u s st.----I beg pardon of the Noble Duke ;vessel,Mil, Weald it not hare been matter of conrer% awn on
but the witness has stated no such thing. He said 64„,.3?—The pew°, iris generally obirite,l ,„.
there was no iinmediate danger ; but, with great sub- Lord °Roses:too thought, that as matter of belief aas
mission, that is very different from his stating that received from the witness, as to Bergami --leeping in the
there was nu danger at all. I am only anxious that led, he could pot see why he shonl.l not state his belief
one question shall not assume a previous answer which 0" this point also.
Lord LITIR t said, that the witness night have a
bas never been given. 11,4 occur-
satiety of reasons for his belief of a fact having
The Duke of Avnot.-1 assure the Honourable sod
Learned Orntleman, I intended that question shouldn't. 4 hit this was merely as to what conver.ation had
woes the crew.
brace the witnesses exact words,— Tteilioltle Lord then asked whether su 11 things
Was there any danger 1-1 have already said, that ec. i mire occurred without his knowing it :-
there was no immediate danger. If I thooglit there
the LORD CilitaeClLlOß thought the question
was, I should not so easily have brought myself to sleep
could sot he pat.
below.
Was there in Toor opinion sucient danger to induce Lord Sousa. —Yon have stated that you lived a
ffi
you to recommend that a male attendant should sloop bong While with the Princess, and that it was your
Within the tent ?-1 have already said, I never recent I opittleti that the kindness shown by. her Royal High-
- • stis to.ilergutni's family, arose from propor motives.
By Lind" ORANTHAX.—TOR said. that at Colwell hat little Now, wren child, the inother, the sister, the
.
Royal Highness dined occasionally with the Dregs!
linetben Said the other relatives of Bergami's werw
Duke and oho ocecesionelly with the
those:**Maros WM
you dine with her Royal Highness oh r 111111.16"ta into the family, re" rm. give any fia000;
ealsp hit wife, as the fitted nurse of the Mid, Will!.]
--I did. !
Tonight the supped also with dome Illsodoesildo, *introaseed ?
lone, AM wilt then sisti with tier Ronal Iligibeediej44 . no Unto Clrowelisioti said, that it was Tor!.&
dish -• 41
• „. ,1110001 in *tate het., ana for their Lordships to
At *bent what hour is hie diem 0
, ermaur..B 4et An thine heti ; tbeirefore all this sort of cues-
that Court?---I do not know ositegq. it es we to =tot ho_,illtrojer.
the evening, but I really moot give the b.*

•, .

K ,~~ .... ii:~N••r.

!

---••••••
1 • •