The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-02-16 00:00:00

to aofaixt;n Indelibleagainitiistatifi.gma on
it
was
tlio
suittou•albte,
ted
Lord.--(Hear, bear.)—He had etidearonrea
done to poison the public mind, but the very
themselves, when he ventured to broach thattaost
reprehensible and abominable doctrine, that after a
tsial.tba..fiasrn.. though technically acquitted was
Ily convicted.—(Hrar, hear, hear.)—Such u as
iption was an entire suhversinn of the eta..
iples of puttee—it poisoned the administrattoli
the laws at theii sow .e. He (Lord A. Hamilton)
fesseil he could not see the puibility of the new
being tr.inquillized as long as the effect of that
ration remained sitsilenied. He hoped the (dues
ld pardon any. manifestation of warmth on hit
but when the object was imputed to Lima 4,‘
ming the public mind, he must repeat, it was ,
gr.ituitons assumption on time pert of th• Nabk
Lord, and that he (Lord A. Hamilton) would flat"
be the object than the author of it. lie was is Labe
whether the Noble Lord himself coasideet4 that air
Majesty's Ministers bad or had not the power of Div '
ing orders to the Church of Scotland. ft was asserted
that they bail the right to iasne it, but that order was
nn;atory. If it was nugatory, then he must say
an order, whirls was sure to be disclaimed and see
in Scotland, w.as one which the Cabinet and the. Nei •
Coalmen were not justified in issuing'.
Lord CASTLEREAOH, in explanatioa, said, that
he did not apply any improper intentlon to the Nettie
Lord. He meant to state, that the effect of such lea.
Lions, alleging grievances, withont the applierstion of
any remedy, had the tendency to irritate the public
mind. With respect to the Queen, what be observed
was, that the acquittal was similar to such an aster
tat in the Courts below; as followed from a dull
the indictment, or on a point referred to the Judges.
Sir J. M ACK I NTOSII explained.
The House then divided-aoAyes, 35—Noes, 110—:-
I Majority against the motion 75.
IRISH LAW COURTS.
On the motion of tlr. C. ()RANT, after some few
servations from Sir .1. Newport, Mr. Benue, and I.
Martin, leave was given to bring in a Will to ream
the Proceeding's of the Civil Side of the Court of Rise
' Bench, the ('rumor Side of the Common Pleas, aid Se
I Pleas of the exchequer.
Mr. C. tinANT gave notice, that on to-morrow he
%Timid move, in a Lononittee of the wnole How, a It..
solution that the Salaries of the Officers of the said
Courts be paid out of the Counolidated Fund.
On the motion of Sir J. NEWPORT, a Returner tie
Nantes and Dates and Sums given as remuneration to
the Commiasioners ap 'Weil to inquire into time English
Courts of Law was, b. red to be laid on the tahie.
Lord FOLK,
ES s moved that there be laid belies
the House an Acconat of all Salaries above 150/. par
annum,
annum, increased mince 1;93, " eify ring
Ithe amount
the increase, and whether made in lien of fees.
After a few wools from Mr. Kobiteion and Mr. Onal-
burn, who stated the Acconnts would be volatilises',
and that a notice was desirable, Lord Folkestone with.
drew his motion, amel gave notice of it fur to-morrow.
The LORI/ ADVOCATE moved the Order of the
Day for the House going into a Committee to consider
time Compensation to the Clerks of the Seotch Coatis et
Admiralty.
Mr. i'ItEEVEY knew of no grounds for marina.
Lion to Scotch Cleats. Wass it because the Lyme*
Lord merely held a paper in his h and that the rat
money was to be thus expended ? They were there W
retrench, and not to grant. 'the Hon. Member for
Abingdon, in the spirit of that feeling, had given ace
tier of a motion for a reduction of taxes to the *mom.
of three millions, and he sincerely hoped he notild look
reed in his object. He knew there were such things as
Scotch jobs and English jobs, but he knew nothing of
these Clerks. They may have some-claim—they mete be
relatives of great men—they may be Loyal Aildrenere.
—(a lie woula give u
lnathe
merely because time Learned lard, contideinial
whisper, had 'dipped a paper, as if it were a play-Mi.
into the bands of the Speaker.—(A laugh. mad bete,
hear.)—His object was to ix the attention of the pespie
of England on thew transactions, that they Untold be
fully informed of the process—that they. should andeto
sand how their money was divined of ut that Hook.
Indeed, it appeared almost time only business of that
House to give away money,. as if they picked it sp
mg
accident.
The LOAD ADVOCATE said, that in consecrate,
of the Reports of C‘onissiseimers the fres of thoset;lerim
were abolished, bet as they had vested rights, they were

to he remunerated.
Mr. W. SMITH thonght the Learned Loyd sheet
hare preciously made that etplanation to the Comainee.:
The !.oral A.dvorate explained.
Mr. liright said a few words on the opposite silk. •
Mr. CHEEVEY observed, that a Noble Frieodefhie
had just before submitted a motion to the House,
a view of obtaininr returns of all places which mat
held at salaries above 110. per amines, in orate.
ground npnn the information in obtained, propotifio
for saving a portion of the public money. Ilet
a
Howson-Ode tient-tenon opposite requested the
Mover to give thesis time to entmitler the sullied;
expressed a great ;stalely that such a hosiness
not he hurried. Now, however, when the Lord dame'
cote cause to tlem mil an actual vote of money from 1110°
Hosier, no time for consideration wos asked;
Was said almost hurry and precipitancy; and for
was this actual vote of looney required' Whv, fse
Admiralty Conn in Scotland—a Court whirls be IP,
sever heird of—(a 44 not Think thees
was asking too much, to legume that this *Mies eleoll•
be put Is this "Alie Sittbattol% at that of Noble ?demi
--(hese. heat !I —and that stuuntietkv. altoalil scestre-
fore motley was voted for Scothool, that OR>
which is was moved I. • might he and lie
would therefore move, that the Chairman he mimed
report progress. athe I)
no. soh he taken 111110 rialvddißS.
• stun nnother day. This should be thole inn o
bet tit
mmon
eence.--(ortlerl.)—That was his opinion; l
it g bll fair that time holil he I .ven to too:tiler the de.
me unds of the Crown,s asn well so those guide on tile poi
of the People.
Mr. COCKTENAY contended that there was an iss•
logy between the two cases; the !notion of Ms &Mb
Friend was founded on a document aetually Woe.
Manse and was made in consequence of the dirtier, na.
conona:tsdation of the Co ttttt sisosoners, who had hem sr
pointed to ineleire into the slant of the Scotele ConrtsS
.
Mr. I)ENkIAN said, that the woo Commisslose is
host some time axo declared a high °dice
Hand to hr uselese, and Vet it was tilled op. dolP.
l
vac:aims, notwitlvitanding their representatom A
*trance. This turaatim.% Isicb was f°°°dej ".16
tiftrten°tllhilemelssestnjiti"irus iinavirdsedreelsettlipTitt vteleril
he thonght their:l4e mosey tecfht not to be V
whray the bad ties* to examine tbo .
Ike merits of the proposition. . 1
e
Mr. 1 DAS smpported the 'notion.
)UN
lionl ROLKLITME sod Mlr J. NEWIPOST•abI •
rn 'words iris favour of the Amendment.
Tile LOll.l, ADSOCATS rsplaised
W. Smith .
Ate'* a few words how Mr. *fro '
N7reetov,
Mr. Wok lie was eartaintidlllo.#,
•