The Statesman.
London, England, 1812-04-10 00:00:00

Earl ratErstatei that he untlersteod, with re.
spect to'llis motion relative to Notes presented at the
Book of England, and refused payment on the.
gropnd of their being forged, that there was no ob.
jection to furnish the total amount, or the amotiof in
each year, Nina! 1797, but that there wa4 an objtv..o,
lion to urnish the number and description of the.
notes of which payment had been refte.e.l. Not be-
ing aware or the validity of this lett.- objection,: he
intetelti to bring forward his m( .:441 on 'Tuesday
nest. _ _

The Earl of LAUDERDALE presented a Peti-
tion from a person of the name of liorthwick, against
the claim of another person of that name, now claim-
ing the Peerage•of Borthwick, which was'orderedto
by taken into consideration to-morrow.
Adjoureed till to-morrow (this day).

.71,1 11.6U§t: OF. COMMONS.
*id 'brottlett ap, agreeably to the Order of the !
moose...cots& Prieto relative to the Licence Trade. Ordered
to limototbesaMt aad.tobe printed.
• 'EAST' INDIA COMPANY.
Lord G. L. GOWER presented a Petition from the Merchants,
Manefacturers. Ste. of the town of Walsall. against the-ream+ al
etthe East. India Company's Monopoly. Ordered to lie on the
table.
TAXES.
On the Motion of Mr. NiA.CD ONALD, then was arilemul le
be laid before the Rothe, an Account oldie Perrsoneutaad Wet
Taxes, for the year ending sth of April,lBl2, distinguishing each
quarter.
• INNKEEPERS' ALLOWANCES.
Mr. FULLER presented a Petition from the Inekeeitert of
the county of Sealer' complaining of the Insufficiency of the al-
lowances far the etn artering of soldiers. _
Lord PALSIERSTON said, if any thing could he done to
give relief, so far as-the contractors were -concerted, he should.
be happy at it,
Sir C. BURRELL declared It to be his conviction that the
junkeepem af Surnene were aggrieved, aad hoped that relief
1.% would be affomkd theirs. The-Petition was ordered to lie on the
re *hie. • *A •
s !‘• • ?Id OF GEORGE 111.
Mr. LYTTEI.TON postpone-d his Brodie on this sullied,
from the 23d April to the sdt May nest.
BANK OF ENGLAND DIVIDENDS. -
Lord A. H A MILTON gaveaotiee of a motion for to4serrelF,
to the effect of prohibiting the Bank of England from -, eying
-larger Dividends, dating the period of the restriction from pay-
ment in specie, than tire& which they now paid.
The action of the Innkeepers' Allowance BiU was brought
up and agreed to.
SEA WATER BATHS BILL.
Mr. P. MOORE presented a Petition from the
.Royal College of Physicians of London in favour of
this Bill. Ordered to lie on the table.—Also Peti-
tions in favour of the same Bill from the Inhabitants
of Westminster/ and from the Inhabitants of Lon-
don, which were also ordered to lie on the table.—
.- . He then moved that the Bill be read a second time.
Admiral HARVEY opposed it. He had instruc-
tions to oppose it from many quarters. The line
•through which it was purposed to pasi extended 40
•miles in length, and he had not heard the name of a
single person through the whole of this extent of
- country mentioned, who gave his support to the pre-
sent Bill. Be moved that the Bill should be read a
third time this day six months.
• • Lord /lENNIK ER also opposed it.
Mr. P. MOORE hoped, after the Petition pre-
sented by the College of Physicians, and the Petition
from the inhabitants of the metropolis,• expressing
their desire to follow the advice of the faculty, in
availing themselves of the benefit of the present un-
dertaking, the House would not refuse at least to go
into the Committee.

„ .

Admiral Harvey, Lord Henniker, and Mr. Moons.'
mutually explained.
Mr. HUME said, 7-Bths of those interested in
the Bill had given their asseut to the measure, and
only 1-7th had dissented. Ile hoped, therefore, the
Bill might go to a Committee.
Mr. CURWEN thought there was no comparison
between the benefits and inconveniences likely to
result from the present Bill. As such it had his sup:
port.

On a Division the numbers were—For the Bill, 17
—Against it, 29. The Bill was accordingly thrown
out.