The Statesman.
London, England, 1812-03-06 00:00:00

TMg sTA,r

resort to delay to evade it, and soon after Mr. Walsh's
debts were paid, the bankruptcy superseded, and the
matter heard no more-of. With respect to the pro-
mediegehattagaiest Mr. Walsh, they appeared to.
hint to be of a nature the most inconsisteetr inmate
grapes, and absurd, There had been a trialwad no
trial, an offence and no. offence, a pardon' and .no
pardon., Me. Walsh had been indicted for felony,
tried„stni convicted, but the verdict *as afalise one.
Boer- mule th‘s ? It was found subject to the opinion
of the Judges hereafter'--a mode of finding, of which,'
be the bye, the fewer instances that occurred; the
better ; but *hat sort of law must that be ? In what,
state must those laws be, of which the great law ex-,
pounders themselves are ignorant? If the Judges.
themselves do not know the law, is not that law -
a mere Beare for men, instead of being whaf it
ought to be, a safeguard ? This was a topic,
which, In his mind,. called fOr the most serious '
comiderationi---With respect to the pardon—
he trioalneo if it could properly be so called— 1
he had understood that a free pardon must pass under
the Great Seal—he was sure that at least, in the pre-
seat instance, there should have been more publicity.
Mr. Walsh should have pleaded his pardon in open
Comet ; the reasons for granting the pardon should
have been stated at large, and the Judges would be
thee bound by their oaths to say, whether the rea-
sons Were, according to law' fit, just, and tid€
quits: . As to the intentien of Mr. Walsh, his let*:
left no room for doubt, though he (Sir F.) kieven
not how that letter got-into public circubttion, or by;
what manegement at the Post Office it was, 'the.`i
first instance, secured ; however, he the:tight there
had been:full meatigh made out to eonvict.Mr. Walsh;
ofneulaominable fraud ; and* as guilty of such fraud,
be should certainly vote for his expulsion from that I
House. Before he sat down he wished to mention !
eue or twp cases, which, -in his mind, the House
ought to have prosecuted with as much, if not more
rigour-than the present.—These cases were not dfawn
from. remote, but -tecent times; for, as for prece- ',
dents of the proceedinga of that House, there was '
imertely any thing for which there might not be 1
foetid a *precedent in the I:rate:land violent times '
t/ist had passed et different intervals. The first in-
.stance be shOuldnapntioa was that of Mr.titeelee-Ais
-mad, in a public point of view, was of infinitely .
&Mater. moment.than the private transaction io the 1
sent instance ; and yet there hedbeen no -notice 1
tekeu of it. It appeared upon the report of. the i
Finance Committed, during the Administration of
the Holuserisble Geutlerimit, Who 'hid preCeded the
present Tredsliter of the":4laiy,:sii'aispFtred there
lliat. he wee ia 40 .44 tjttepjihlic to' the • amount of
'19,0001. It mighebeeeeid tbitt 6e had paid this money
back : this was meallevietion whatever, and the in. i
'latest was at alrevener- US to the public.' -The fleet
case he mentioned wallet of 'Mr. Hunt; `.'Tait Per-
sal: heir. been let go to •Pktiigal, nelerelii *could
have 'bee% easilemappreheutsjell,_ if .the Government
thotight proper.. Me was non* the Brazils, where
they could es easily eppreheeei him ; and yet this
defaulter, hemelder4o, 'was
.at that, moment in the
actual receipt et tata,pemiionaron't this country, to
,the auicant -of 150061.-4-yeae—orte of them granted I
him in the year 1803, and. the other in the year
18044 Another instance was that of Mr. Mills„, who, .j
for tab purpose or cheating his creditors, bought4l
seat in that House. He was at the time a prisoner
for debt to en Immense amount in the King's Bench :1
his creditors petitioned the House and besought them
. not to interpose their privileges in behalf of a swindling
trick to defraud them. The Petition was, however,
'of no avail : Mills was enlarged, and took the op-
portunity his privilege of Parliament afforded him,
of escaping to America. There was another case of 1
greater public enormity than either, because Much
pore pregnant with mischievous consequences, and j
that was the ems, of Mr. Pitt advancing 40,001. ofd'
the public.mooey to Messrs. Boyd and Bentieldttale,
Of. the host of voters. at his *beck—the greatness 4
- ale individual in .that.ilouse might have then prise
tested kim—ke might bave been' saved, perhaps, byi
a majority of eNch Votes as Tar influeeced in tide
way : they had
,Teard of late enough to' show that
sash iailuericejN filet ; fOr what else 'could be'
pewit ky dp.winlitedrilitiction between what ought;
afilpftat A's ririt to • be considltredis a Cabinet wive•
tato:•-4et dfifilitrensaCtion of litte•Pitt he had al-
s
bays ittfriliik the rime- bpiniotiolnad thought' it a I
.. „,
: doss tea.th. iiiibtic ditynnder the shameless prtr- !
- te'nee-Ofkettppertherthe public credit. Vicar, beer! i
Irons the Afidisit+sig Benelles:] If if sine:foss the I
.•
ispperrett We'ciirelifi han could only soy that it
Atia am ,to
, ti supPtrttheeredit.of that Howe with
..the, • . qif •ieugh, • feed Isl•ar hear!] ' Itthe
raaih
, Ilers. Gentiiiman Opposite fltr. Hume); 'site Sad
sroptieldhttlinl is ttte debate, tfieseghtthat Housevto• be
retitle tif Vt`ollectirin (if. he knew not haw to mats I
Illrein-Af theii-tr;ere atiy or many' such persons . in'
'eat House, or' in the country, that *Mild be 'with
liTto it-tenfold reaaen why therevil-shloold -be St
before' it prooteded to such excel% mdtilia- ahoy
should ge on the principle, that where roguery seas
so general,. It was moreprudent to passiteter. This!
reminded him of that part of, the dialoger'between 1
Lady Macbeth and the child—her son asks, " wnd
-via,: they alt he hanged that swear and tier' Lady 1
- Macbeth replies in the atfirmative: " Who must
•hleg them," demands the child. 64 Why, the ho-
nest men." Upon which the child observe', " then
- the liars and sweatier' are fools, for there aim liars
and swearers enough to beat the honesty-sod hang
up them." [A laugh.] - He concluded with re-
peating-hientpitdon, that the House in the present in-
-'stance had a right to expel Mr.-Watsh, sad erpreesed
'his intention of toting in adpport of the motion.
Mr. 11E11,841LT spoke-against the emotion.
•e. Mr; ABERCROIII 818 had listened attentively to'
•'-gelatt had been-urged oh eitheo side; bet; 'boseve?
74,161161 e he certainly felt it to be, that Mr... Walsh
leablesetbeepennitted to -sit looped* the-House,
-.. ersaddiessot help, •perhape from the iptipeetee 01( le-
_ ..

5
. bad buss peeved. t• *be ‘416 iettal;becet _.___c Jr' regiLT`"ZE-l'elm'a" a • 'al-- --
ht Hon. Gent. (Mr. Ballinitt) had said that there laseWlmerreffelay' mirflol thenfial lerPealMediag
enough to constitute it letildtetteaneur. As far as matilr-ildrAffalsh. • .
his own knowledge went, -Wad: geed authotitpoi . . . tfllirt44lBlfißALagreedwitisthose:-
believing otherwise. He cent:tired that the Illsoeviirbodadifil tbe elalele- Mr. Walsh oeghtle• bar
on being about to estibilsh a new preoedent, 4iitl4lll:e4. .411telatiesSes aoquittab The factatimeljell
confine itself to the strictest rules of‘preimiellith 'Weft. Judea ttie„iediffea were maninous Ai*
and to the maxims and principles of Courts.ittaw. dirt .I.6.l6olllotieele felony. •Ho then _wise into
Mr. BATHURST explained. ~.. ~;. an •lediellidiet•elle moths odopted in.tbe triatof -Mr.
Mr. NV YNNE agreed that this was alum • ; Walsh, which wait attended with no practical Wea-
butt,* fonds cemented in 1733 were * ' veniessee,.'illd ''Was both' more expeditious, and at-
of public nature, although they forsotietheistioosid -tended-with less expenee, than recurring to a special
el -ulsion. 'Neither were the frauds of the South verdict. The only analogy with the presentimise
.0i
Corporation frauds of a private oaten. la the afforded him by his experience,. was thatof algae..
yofi i77t, Mr. Ward was eipeticoli he having been poration which could net proceed to eipsimuldember
convicted of perjury, although no judgment had taken. till he was legally convicted *fan offence ptuditthaarb,
place. Mr. Atkilson was also expelled, on the mere law. The Weems, however, adopted .a tillihreat
verdict of a Jury. ' lie was sorry • that the ancient Mode of proceeding; and proceeded first to ealege
`practice of proceeding,' as alluded to by the Hon. and 'afterwards- to prosecute. He could not there
Baronet, had net been adopted. : The practice was -fore but consider, if the House had thought it Imes.
first departed from in 1753 ; and this departure was soy that the offence for which a Member was alone
then censured by Mr. Justice Forsteraud Lord Hard- to'be expelled, should be a legal crime, that-the or.
wicke. The course on such mentions was by Writ der of theirpreceeding would have bash inuteted,aod
of rover to the House of Lords-s,the.te amid be so that theiimeeetiee *°tdd 411" Preceded the eellet*:
right to oust them of their jurisdletioe. The cases of Mon. The question to be considered at present lady
i criminal appeals' always took precedence tkf every what was the nature of the offences which led to ex-i
i other question, as in the instince of Stetted Make. puision ? Several instances had.been stated; •and it i
; The House had now the evidence of the deliaguent's I appeared to • him, she -ow' of the Charitable
letter, which he was mach surprised to hear tallednisl Corpoateition Was exitetly• like the present, and
`extenuation of his offence as it the mere act of epbbleg 1 that it; did Set came • `rip 44. a. taisapplieotioa.l
;Is friend constituted all the turpitude; and: 10444silef he public mosey. , lie -.could not see whom
money hod beentellepeteserlffis' "via there woad flit' it 'differed from ' the; * ieation of any.)
I„have been nothistreilsOpeW,therovailakig;,.. : .;,....i,: . Vlftdkibg tom* '. ' ' . A
! was sorry to•sity, theileferis too leech this • WIC et I with' - 74".'• '7' 'An'aintimatrail II uteri in that.
the age to set up `the cant of' seediest. In*. to ' :. •. . I t was at lent equalled by that of Mr..
humanity against the dictates of sober rearm and ilifelsb: -* • could, indeed; see no act, in a mug!
sound honesty [hear !] As to what had been said 1 *pint of ' *,'Snore heinoiss than that of Mr. Walsh.
!with respect to the. crime of adultery, he did notl He was sot Ilkat the Trustee, Wheat, without...omo
know that it incapacitated a man from doing his &link to juitiff;"he thought might seseetimes baled;
ias a Member of Parliament, and watching over thelfrotn particular 'cireeinstances, to Snake au ITO . ee
;public interests. He, however, who - committed a ' use of the funds entrusted to him; with the IMMO.,
crime like that of Mr. Walsh, might be presumed oho I Lion of afterwardlreplacinglbem ; but he had fatiet
1.
jectionable to his constituents, and might therefore be ~a deliberate' plan; he bad looked coolly round AO ilia''
fairly sent back to them. The lion. Gentleman then ! whom he might plunder. He compared the reword'
entered into the cases of Mr. Steele and Mr. Mills, ! tive facilities; he was inclined to make the depsethe.
mentioned by the Honourable Baronet.. The former! thin on one whom he thought the public feeling
was not a Member of the House, and therefore 1 vouldconsider as not so much entitled to complain
could never have been expelled ; and the ground on 1 at another; but finding this impracticable, be re-
-1 which the latter was allowed his seat west that the !sorted at last to his old protector, for no titer rea:
I creditors' alone deposed as to the facts. It was oft soli but because he wanted the money, and because
great importance to prevent a precedent, *by which a he thought Sir Thomas Plower did not so much want
man, by Swearing a debt, would have it to his power it'. Such an instance of cool and deliberate villainy
Ito defeat the election of entitling/or of the House. cold hardly well be exceeded. Still be thought the
Ira(' he intended to oppose the motion of expehien, Muse ought to be cautious; though if they were to
.he would have opposed the production of the record- allow themselves to be afraid Of popular clamour,
ed conviction. If it would -be to establish a new they would act unworthy of themselves. Upon the
1
! precedent, was this never to bo done ? [Hear, hear!] whole, be was not able to distinguish in principle,
Cotonel Cawthorne had been expelled upon the ten.' between the case of the Charitable Fund and the
tense of a Contt-martial, yet Lord G. Saekvilie, also present, and if the one cue was-justifiable, he could
convicted by a Coot-martial, was permitted to retain net see why eta expuislan at present was not also jut-
his seat. It was obvious, therefore, that on such tillable. Hithould therefore give his vote for the
occasions the House had not guided itself by the, Nodes. ' , •'•
principles or proceedings of other Courts. It was ' Mr: W. Einar said, that on the one hand the
1 not a punishment on -Mr. Walsh, but an act of jus- House must feel themselves embarrassed by amoeba-
} tice to themselves. . log with a man like Mr. Walsh; and, on the other
Mr. C. ADAMS would support the motion. fie; hand, there was a danger of establishing a precedent -
' should feel great awkwardness in coming in contact &Uptight be attended with the most ruinous cense-
! with a person of Mr. Walsh', elsoneter. - , qinanse. There Wu se privilege. which the House
I Mr. .LAMBltoppeted the moth*, atit' eombateit7eirti tis belfriiii icirpliteel fir priliffit thim Tftat et
I the argdusent drawn from the notoriety of the trent- expulsion. The House 'Swett to consider Mr.
I swami, and the opinion of the Public. The House Walsh as an Innocent limn in the eye of the law. The
was the proper jade of the law of Parliament.
question then was, were they to enquire into the ma.
Mr. WHITI3I.kD observed, that the vote ral conduct of Men? For his part, he was not pro:
which he should give that night, would be contrary pared to launch into an ocean without bounds. s!*
to the first impressions which he entertained on the Mr. HAWKINS•BROWNE declared himself IC
• present question ; 'and this led him to think that no favour of the motion.
j principle ought to be more strongly inculcated `The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
through life, than not to give way to first irapres- could not.consent to give a silent vets on the present
1 ileac When he first hoard of the atrocious fraud Occasion. He hid no doubt, whatever Wig the de-
which bad been practised on Sir Thomas Plainer , termination of the House neithOYSirOilddistredit
by Mr. Walsh, he felt that indignation which almost attack to theeek..aor intiesperuteNtelestsai;.te- ins-
every other man in the country, then felt, and that puted to thew: kilt* question -Wag; 'what*, :•ttay.
he ought to be expelled from that Nouse. But the principle Coald'hiiiellected from the lalkiediaillna
I dare .he hid, .considered this subject, the more allow tie Rouse to eget any of ita Membeenteldh:
he ion convicted that Mr. Walsh ought not to oultiegal. conviction of his guilt ; and for hit poet
he expelled. It had been said that the object of the ; he'saw no reason io think -that the Reese were mu.
House- in expeliblg Mr. Walsh, was vindictive ; but ! rowed to the cash of Manictiou. It was sufficient it
in his opinion, if this was their object, he ought sot I they got evideftee of Ilk guilt whether the facts wins,
to be expelled, but kept as a Member of Parlia- established by the' Reports of Commissioners, br by
moot, and made to attend in his place regularly the Report of a Committee of their:own Body. Ak-
-1 every day. [Laugh.] With respect to precedents, gal prosecution and `conviction were sot 'necessary ;it
they would subject themselves to just reproach, if was sufficient. If they were • ogled in their oonsci.-
they Mt out without having sufficient grounds to jus... el:al-that the facia had been. Committed. He then
Itify them ; but then if there were sufficient grounds to alluded to the Charitable Corporation ease: 'ln that'
justify their prociedlnp; if there were no precedents, case, be very much doubted whether I conviction Coal
they °meadow* tont a precedent: The queltiou to I Mae 'been obtained. With respect, to the present
be Considered' was, whit wait ?dr. Walsh, in the eye , case, it'mnat be take, is a record of acquittal ; but
of the law ? He was innocent of the crime of felony. I still it Must be considered in the dight•rif a special
!If he was innocent of felony, was he guilty of any 1 verdict establisides the fact. If a special verdict had
I ether mime; The letterofthe-Leartted Judge, Sir A. been taken, Would not the House, on such aii Ore-
lM'Deolid,statedmerely,thaethe fact of the fraudulent does oui, hive proceeded to expulsion ? The facts,
design, and the subsequent appropriation, bed hems. liidWes*; were as well known as if a erdersimdict.
pp end; • But did this amount to what oterstitated I had Wen dabbled. The euestiowilhen.pOnlpdael
Isgarsuilt ?By 'no means. What was proud. .did 1 a Olden iset galley a Glob ' bedi . " ,to .idver,
net amount to a aisle hi- the eye of law. He would eiiiiitatted grad fiend, was a peruse. }ohs • Agile t.'
I
!suppose that no prosecution had ever been pet on bicotgleited a Member of that flee,?'• No doubt
I loot, and that the Hooey had merely got possession of thug was great sillitalty in i&twhp ifiselsetween
the letter of Mr. Walsh--.ln that cue he would ask, , sachinties as ought to be visited bylemelds., and !
I was there any man in, the House of Ceremony who ! saob as. eight not. Be wound, kneestert. daisy the
•wssaid base ;entered, on such a consideratseal_toi arida, that bums* this 11111111114 ' goilt•Oemediled by
maize a _motion similar to. that made by the Ho. • Mt. Walsh 'wan net wade peleMeige by any Act of
•aourable Member (Mr. &ekes) that night ?• As to Parilement, Wiener lafinseas, the, Huse were
the general argameet which had been uSed; that; to - Obit their 'eyes Sr it:. .i Three maid be no
..every society meat pemess a power of eepOlietele.' liseger Of this preiedent Ade, Owed by' any
eeeioulemebeas; *fiegme on account of imeterentlo' "Per`iii the ',110011114,1411601- air- Illiteact •
;legal-guilt or orisinlownies; he would &breve; -thee 'Motel - edit 1711•111W-Virillemlilli11407pro-
Ober societies frespietfy acted merely on eafirke, paned to be" . TfrlThiele Mae Aglow of
were sousantable eety toile:Melva, and their pre. I moral guilt 41111iiiitsWeeiet"
:aim
sintice.
.osedinge unildfarinip sissaleiy to the proceed*. of mibidivenhelt Ifirgefillso Oki'
I.thave
vat Hops.. They.* no connection 'irith Efietitrb, perjury,' and tell: ,be'si;lllll7t .me • airy ommiso'''
reoleellis7ifixeid•s bet
'the themsel Wb ves...
Ilihrt re'aiiirg:a. •s • tie die vt Ilit etherremlie- had a awe
the fen& get:lane, -was net -an argument thr the Wkidle pistiselat oitareed;' itnweittuothave busied:
Poloint. elfSdaialt, ;se iamb' at it was a isdeiciiiietis aid 10 dii-didibii V Thor eriiii-r• preesineat la the
- • peen imitfiaving omitted ' '•.‘ limit - —isle dr LettioNvy,Abi, iambi* leceefeiritrieed notes
from one sts, •
e91414..f!"'

•

_

• •.
l ...~

,


b'n_t


' •
ta

C.

principle upon wbidi the House had proceeded on all
their precedents, • was the guilt, of •the
end not the legal establishment of a nein*: Ai then
took a review of several,eram,Nth: treirct to
Boyd sod Benfields ht vas saftmislstell fml/111.11 per.
n vould conceive tbstv tea botasoy-aisafiegy loth&
present. He reallY.Cutarf Wet-tie-We dillsey'dt kfr,
ing down a precedent from 'the peiallstiltx of fetal
Ouse ; because, before preceedisig to -omaillinot
was necessary to hive a fraudulent sabljoat
upon • and he could hardly conceive Ai 14*
lber vrluid become funky of moral
man.
The House then divided, ••-• • • .-

Few tbei
..316 .
Again g it l6
Majority. • ,'
Mr. WHIT Rit.RADseitiug er n. Gent. in
his place (Mr. Ryder) t of aski of
that Right Hem - Gent. if 'Whit
the Prince Regentrthat a Nelliel 11 ioord,• Meloglor:
that House, had •in his custody a Petition folioed by
several thousands of the Ste/Grabby Potterst.h.c.
• •-, • .7" •
against the ()Merl in:Connell t * . •
Mr. RYDER said he had emainankatit to tbst
Noble Lord' by Whom the Petition had so.igloOty
been entrusted to Wm; the aisle Of the sidayitibisah
'.had takes piace,ta preseepitlise,Reptigs7iii irkep.!
dos, wbioh wasp thatit3fluroitottlettit pr!vehe tack
Petition, unless when limit
Mr. WHITBREAD saki; hi thou* hi gel'
other nit* MesitiOled this subject,' so decetithtt
I have been* iit tap—power of the Right Hos.
to have noticed this circumstance.., • :•
Mr. RYDER** not aware that any further Com•
snunication was required from bite.. - • •
The other Orders•of the Diy wire trugeoidAttoill
the House adjourned. '

• ff./WC& -
Mr. Ease read yestertbry .asonditi>tt SeAltedi.
Exchange the foqiowiagpropoetlfrodathe haucellor.
of the Exchequer, for raising 6,782,5261. by Nary.
5 per Cent. Annuities, in addition to the sum of
5,431,7001. astimetibed in Exchequer Bat, to be
funded in the month of February last, .making tape.
ther 12,221,3251. ehich is the whole sum proposed
to be funded in 5 per Cent. Stock during the present
year :—Every Subscriber of the Exchequer
funded as above.mentioned, is to be entitled to COO*
tribute a further rum-, at •the rate of 12.61. for every
1001. contributed, 1081. in 6 per. Cent. Stack, to be
added to the Steck created by the above subscriptions
and to bear interest from the sth Jan. 1812.
Payments ou each 1001. subscribed to be seeds as
follows :-
1814, March 18, payslent of
April 14, do. 10
Ataky 15, do, 10
Juan 25, do. .... . 10
J4t9 24, do. ICI
Ang. 48, do. ' lO
Sept. 45, do. .... - 30
Oct. 16, dog. lO
Nov. 47, do. 10
• -Dec. 31, do. 10
100
A discount to be spewed -of 4.4ser- Amp'. on the
wholen.oftey edvaseed heyoe44hellooll.lftette the
"Meal manner. Exchequer Bills dathst SO= the
let of Mat* 1811, and 14th of Febrility. 1812,
both inclusive, -with the interest due Amps, will
be received as payment of the contribution.. A,book
will be opened at the Batik for recd chg: :the tab.
scriptions of those who may chase -te!Wie-dlerft.
selves 'of the option ; and it will remito open for
that purpose from Monday, this Qtk, of larch, to
Monday, the 10th of the present month? betikitsclu.
sive. if the parties to wimerthe offer is hereby gi.
. vesi dO not subscribe the whole sew ef.11,7821,6251.
it is :to-' be understood that the Chasseskier of the
Exchequer will beat liberty to come Ruth, public
at large, or to raise such sum as may be truths to
complete the said sum of 6,789,525 f. in any' other
manner. The discoent on payment-in fall is 21. 17s.
..-5 per Mats. were done at 91f-..-New Sabscsipilesm
kat 11 pertietweremiem.
Mr. GartrXx gave notice,.last sight,in the Souse
of Commons, of a Motion on the SUlte of !relied, so
far es respects the Catholic Claims fhr Monday, the
'l3th of April. All the Petition.- firealethat part of
the United Kingdom will be readied heferedhat time.
it *WOO seers e, be the greed driat ef .etrength on
that vesy important and vital qestellen.
Genera -Jaques the late Governor of Java, was
to the Gallery of the House of Commons' yesterday
evening; and appeared to be Very atteidiw to the
(Bit •
It is objected to Lord Lenses Goys*, and Lord
`AIIIII,OII, that they did Cot pairtheir Petitions to the
Pas wca through. the Replete Canal.
Psolot leoersun..—A . match 'at 21 birdi took
-Plus yeoterika -ess Ifeeisleir.iseath;' betielifigen.
dense et the mem of Mecum and %Lusk' Iffir.
Sod, UV* is a Gentleman isrlierkshire. -The4or-
userhilied 17.• binds, missed sesel: and lost the Sher
three** of iseestsie. .The Negev killed 16, sad bit
the otherodeue tietof xiblcktell w hide nfew yard.
of desimendery, and by width Ise lost the match.
Mr. Atm"' . the Pedestrian, performed a mile and
a half within 'eight Siestas ytrdat, at 'Ashford,
for a wager el- 100 guineas.' Tillie the favourite.
Mb sitishiditeedthat *shuns, whose 'heliostat* in
lareCtibilay to escape frosts his
rdeella thelibillitis lately, esoiled so much attention, hats
ieio skieetedi la the following, freed. Some days ago,
jb.ll4llt to a.shop at Il4nktii to porch a -bat ; the
I tradelean refused to On ? his goods to betaken:away
Without die vales beteg Mt; Adhoth trtetkelle.b_
fitted, bet Which..he whir Mid cad* sot be veld,
tie Itiliaistesed stos farmer to . seightbsamheed:
LlYpem this, MisMe...went awes, saying, Jra In*
gall smother time . • Shortly after, 11, boy at
the, chap, 844 suited fort ft reuses lilt ;(whiets
erkd - fhePthbe.-
1646-gw-Sik4ll"-

.. •• .
. ,
. . . .
. . .
•.. , ,
.. .-A,..-.. -..- • - - . .
~,,, . . , ,
' .
-.. • ' r:- . • ',. :. .
..
~ ~„ ~_." i "..• ' -
'' . •-........L......!_...22, -•

?!!

4,4ll4leas"wun.....7g;vidghisreppositr. 7.: t`oulbillomenin —4.(!*"... 411-;ife•age—rie-r-.7, -:
-777-7,11494 billiiiirni• tom.--- 'gill°.
• _. _ s4t Littallit.wl--.l.l.la,4444llllllll.*AllovaismeeleilliCiaglisweneillill geNref i SAUdi"9llll.ll.-111"8"1100:; .3111thill -rimiasvgiN'ilogi-711-
Duisi•a. -No yeti limb* Opt this right 4104.4.4 Ilist-the , I= "I" WS, in** Am* 11615.11"."1' '
rzit .
plissOlosestl butch: id birborns isiiiod thattit • witx sidlisi atiiiri, ; Mittel ill latddle'd Alkiklikilitr Iwygg'7•11411,1116=r1111.1. •116.114144ha11it"
vlitelertiotlidoolf Sad
itelk et tbi -tlNElibissi. lei Oa* Rik elseilikoirille4oo44l6o
ilhtt sitirsiet of Alts shotalotood> sotbk•Ostifii! tO Abe, Vhelikihev _-_ - Oillif_." - -."-ev_,..4) ~._ s, 11/10,,,,,,i0fria55uh,..,,,,a wirw.,,,,,,,,iik . , 41•01pri MK W
Ali
be esilliiied aide Morestasimatiem..iiimv • Wit a wir„f"'"1.;......„,"mF ~_.**1142*-I"l"m",''' argwaiii • ind disaiiii. mai ma- emmaPle Ali
• " Odd IV i• itiiipbslll.llo-0111 , . , _
_.. , 3 .
itiddwitiiiiimowpmecamt...iThei,modok or - .be li__.___Paill".jv 41!"7'14. V,. : ' °•,..44.• , . • . • • frai,eaketatiti owlet* wad net Mimi& .41*- Mr
O. wereslis t*****. Ml** hell fifes it /0"4"F"l4a 'Pa' - : - the 9..
' ...: ' • his band. 'The &101 l boo' Mama :A
*rm.:individual Member so listiihmaLhie
~ * .
tossimallein . nom "-Ptade•l4s-/It •=dt: - )dmilissiitakiltalltileitill ' .1041131. 4-7'11,114 tit 1111"1/11.alse
• • 4
wiel - ' . • . . . , . . _
. -..- • . ". ' tisit:Tios—:& ; -"; ' • 41‘44)001frOoritit •We Aipmrlitemea,am tellimuivibiffie
%Able:am mem •40,feilie#4i4 7,
~ ..--.. -......4 * A. . vols, , for • . . • ~..„4. f ;,; ' . tiltisur%., :-. -:: n •••:: 1- - *••• f
there-was imeselliS tirsisioot 11 *NO emit; • 11100.0101.411.0!sk -:"r"Stil".. .1 - • • ---* . 444-* '''''' ': . .