The Statesman.
London, England, 1818-05-22 00:00:00

Mr. Hone, were removed in an open cart, handcuff•

—werm—mgerraimmourea
• aeure might hase.teen galley of great offeoces
• ail Silght be, tn• het, y tab abatdonitd• ebaracteme
thh Wailes, it was not thought lamp* I.
• send t hteektieller in the sum cart with poisons whoJ
As lalght Wye coternittedifillotty. When they arrived et'
jall„.,thsty lowa sit twiddled together, and lodged
• • olt.tie we* towel." tittered then moved by the Solicitor of
.‘ -.web* putout in question,' that they should be brought
lotiverliasefy se HIM. They were not able to int.
beitient were 'therefore sent.-bick to privon ; bet
afterwards, In the moeth of September, they were
Alteberied on their own reciiubtances. Hating
Hsu submitted • to the attention' of the Huse the
eases of tlimittiolidivideals, he. felt himself bound to
say', 'that' he belibirea there something in
threpopits 'high be theft held in hie band, that might
• oaf be pstrfectly true. Some matters, Ihitlielleved,
▪ lisight be rather overcharged, or mistakeh; if net in.
9/'''4oll4 intreo. hires ceftain
„however, that trait see,-
' • had been exercised:
vit held, that It wield be
ihr‘ •
tifeetini Hit Hese a the se to dwell On the a
-a Isieht, that Inftithonria:itt before doaelctles wee not iar.
• 'ttfrded foreny °thee pitmen than Affieestody. If gni
',Mergers gel:wadded; If the poisons' vita pitt into
Stibjected tete', speties• Of •putiithittent, it
' 'Vas eof °Myofibril, but dlsgrecefel to the cot:titre
el-law/WA itotlived== reproach to the ageirs which we
ai inittt been.' •'ll4 'begged 'pardon of the Hattie for
bating detained them so long on these two cases.` He
oNiestifiFtfehelisldbMille the third—the cue of Robert
; and, with respect to the
so 441likh he was about to make, he'conld' as-
• if* he entertained no-doubt of its being
correct, as he bad employed a professional person to
*admen., its tiscertaht the strict truth. ltehad also
Jeatifillikeldwitleif hithself. It' appeared,
titen.4that •in the month* of March, 1817, about
• 11114 *Hviriftlfsck at night, • ititen'4lV. Swindells and his
helefeeeteliii was tight Mentlit'Seittowith child, were in
efittrti'distatteirb'y.* Ithirsk at the door.—
. Mr. Swindells looked out of the window, and saw
deOred him to come down sod
they:would force it. Alarmed by
I(l44tes and opened the door,
itienOilted for persons who they
thehOuse. A strict search was
tittloo persons werediscovered.
_ opeo„oll the trunks, took several
ibglitotind stripped Mr. Swindells of
'••*lliNat t!iiooged to him. The alarm
- wife were so great on this cc-
emir recovered from the el-
s :of April she was delivered
An the 28th she died. On the
child 4 deprived of the care and
ter, expired. Mr. Swindells him-
: various hardships, was at last
ling been brought to trial. flare,
lestance of the tender mercies of
,vernment, auother example of per.
hoot having committed any crime,
mist any oppnrtunity of proving
Sects cases of injustice could not
• powerful impression on the minds
Ought it right to state to the
Individual whose case he had just
a old seaman; be had been eleven
rice, during four of which he was on
Paris, blockading the squadron at
now put it to them, whether,
'etitioners had somewhat coloured
hose cases did not deserve the
)n. They were about to be sent
_ ..uents ;, and would they return to
igma on their characters, that when
people were imprisoned by Magistrates, ender the
sanction of •his Shjesty's Government, the House
r,
shut its ear, to their Petitions, and refused to lasti.
tote any enquiry ? Leaving them to answer this
gentian by the vote which they would give to-night,
• be should now conclude with moving, 4' That a Se.
lect Committee be appointed to consider the Petitions
* 6f J. B: Mellor and S. Pilling, of Warrington, and
~ of R. Swindells, of Macclesfield, and to report their
opinions thereupon to the House."
The question having been put from the Chair,
Mr. DAVENPORT said, that he knew something
of the case of S.siodells, with regard, to which he
bad received a ',tier from one of the Magistrates
who tisited the Petitioner's beau spots the night of
the "loth of March. This Letter .the Honourable
Gentleman rend, !ain so low a tone that we could
not collect its contents. We understood the writer
to affirm, that no violence was offered to the Pe-
titioner or his fealty upon the night -alleded
The Honourable Gentlemen added, that. knowing
Mr. Cooper and the other Gentlemen who entered
• the house of Swindells,. in consequence of informs-
tionlinit some disaffected persons, who had that
night come armed from Manchester, had taken up
their lodgings there, he could bear testimony to their
• character. On searching the house they found sere.
Ad seditious and blasphemous papers, which they ad.
wised the Petitioner not to publish, but still be con.
tinted to publish them.--fie (Mr. D.), however,
"kneW the Gentleman complained of to possess great
benevolence, and to be as incapable of committing
. any act of cruelty, as be himself would be of de-
fending such an act. •
Mr. BLACKBURNE stated, from the authority
of the Magistrates from whom he bad this day cows
menications, that the two other parties had received
whilst in the workhouse; every accommodation which'
the place afforded—that their removal to prison wet
not attended with any unnecessary rigoor, they be.
ing placed in an open-cart, and connected together.l
for the sake of security, by a light chain. Their
situation also in Preston Jail was stated to be as,
littfe irksome or inconvenient as it would have been
hail they been sent to Lancaster Castle, for that jail
was at this period, In common with others le the
neighbourhood, excessively fell.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL copt9dgd, tbet

the GI

iry At

at. Redacting on the dewy _
occasion, and the' consequent additional imprison-
meal it might impose
,en .the petty,' be immediately
soot- down an order, offering them a discharge ou
their awn recognisance, to enter plea in the Cold
of King's Benef on the erst dry of .the next Term.
If this offer was for a time rejected, be was not the
cause of it, bat the party or parties wise obsileately
refused the indulgence. On the subject of thiecom-
mittal by' the Magistrates, the Hon. .Geoelemen
ds-
aied that they bad iettierity to commit In this wean-
Wer,before trial, to the Hoetwof Corrtitioiir. Now,
on this point, be (the Attorney-General) afield only
say, that this power leaiyted by airtime( two Sta-
tutes- end further, ,vitalll sease given, because it fa-
voured the keened: lo many counties there wis
•only.onejail, cad thatperbapit at some distance, bet
in every piece Almost there was al workhosae; so
(bat the inclosed; Indus% of, possibly, being removed
to a distance, :hid the opportunity ef remaining in
their own immediate neighbourhood. He Was will-
!nits Omit, that if Abe parties were before trial pot
%n herd labour, such putting would be a stretch of
the hear !].—bit auder the 2241 George
111. c. g 4, they might be set to easy work if they
were supported at the expence of the country, and
they were entitled on their discharge to half their
earnings. In stating thus much he was ready to add,
that he had lately, and for a purpose quite oncost.
fleeted with this subject, considered the Statute, and
be rather thought that it was not open to universal
application.—[Loud cries of Hear, hear, hear!]—
This he was free to say. But let the House look at
the sort of labour to which these people were pet—
to pick a couple of pounds of cotton per day. Was
tbis consistent with the assertion that they were sent
to the House of Correction merely for oppression,
and put to hard labour ? As to that part of the case
of Swindells, for a libel, all he should say was, that
no man had been prosecuted with less severity ; he
had never been arrested (as was said) by a Magis-
trate, or by the authority of one. He (tbe Attor.
ner-Genteal) felt it his duty to have filed an Es.
officio Information against him—no warrant what-
ever had been issued but the ordinary law process
by subpoena; he had merely a notice tp appear,
arid no more-401es of Rear, hear, hear !]—
end in default hf his appearance, an attachment was
issued against him. This attachment was not issued
from the Crown-office until thirteen days after the
6th of June, when he was bound to appear. When
taken up for this contempt, it was troe:he applied
to the Mayor, who answered (aod truly) that he
knew nothing of the cause of the, arrest. The party
was by this process, merely called upon to enter an
appearance, no recognizance Was either given or
wanted, and an offer was made to him that if he was
unable to bear the eapence of coming to town, he
had only to authorise the Solicitor for the Treasury
to enter a plea for him, and he should have a copy
of the information gratis, with a otrpersedcas byre.
turn of post.—[Hear, hear!]—so in his case there
was a complete relaxation rather than an aggravation
of punishment. No» as to the domestic sufferings
he ststed he had endured on the 10th March, he
begged, on his honour, to state, that he never heard
of them until lifter the process had been issued.—
[Hear, Roar IF-It was right, however, in justice
to the Magistrates, tweed the attention of the House
to the circumstances attending this part of the case.
It would be recollected that the 10th of March was
the day when the persons called the Blauketeers had
set oat from Manchester, with the intention of pro-
ceeding by two routes (Stockport and Macclesfield)
to London. At Macclesfield the greatest beads pre-
vailed among the lower classes on that day, in the
expectation of one of these bodies, and the Magis-
trates had the greatest difficulty in preserving the
public peace. On the evening of that day a body of
1000 of these Blanketeers entered the town, and
the leaders or delegates of them were said to have
gone to the house of Swindells, who was said to have
been acting is concert with them. The Magistrates
went there merely to ascertain the fact, and seeing
some of the Political Catechisms in the place; and
other inflammatory publications, they certainly car-
ried them away. Ile did not justify this act, or
mean to say that it was legal, but theitiate and site-
ation of the place wriald, he thought, plead much in
extenuation of the Magistrates, who were at such a
crisis responsible for the peace of the tows'. Then
again as to the ill health of the wile; this was tree,
but it was equally true that bee indisposition was not
caused by this visit of the Magistrates; for he, hid
seen an affidavit from the surgeon who attended. her
`for seam time previously, and who deitnibeit her to
have been in a very weak state—rllerer, hear n—
and further, he had information from her fellow-
work-persons in the manufactory, that While ehe
worked there after this matter had occurred 'they
never heard her complain of this as being Pitt+. the
cause or the aggravation of her
The man also bad gone so far as to say, that his
wife was refused medical aid; now, on the contrary,
he Could prove, that a surgeon continued to attend
her until the husband told him he might spare him-
self further unable, as he bad got her into the Dig-
pensary.—(llser, hear !)—Tbis man was again con-
tradicted, when he said, he had been kept on bread
and water for months, whereas the fact was, be had
the general jail allowance which the debtors had in
Chester Jail, and which was substantial food.—.
-(hear, hear!)—When. such evidence in direct
contradiction to his statements were given, where was
the necessity of going into this enquiry T—(Hear!)
Sir S. ROM ILLY conceived this to be a most Im.
portant question, and one which involved two great
and paramount Privileges—be meant the freedem of
the press aid the liberty of the subject.--(Arear,
hede!)-11, deeply regretted the feeling which the
Hoes* seemed disposed to manifest on a question of
suck vital entered--he totAd not bat espies. his
astonishment that they seemed disposed to-go to
ditigoa with so little ammo, ea paints duck

4114111lhe—(Thierfuiskil !) Ile had a tined it as if it
wow a charge brughterinst- himself, which in fact
wits not, viy
.. is "Itiltlict'in removing
by certiorerf,'l4 brae would suppose that, If
object were-to-suppress the libel and punish- the
libeller, the proper. collies would be to proceed*
once against him, And not let the matter rest it
lAisse, and afterwsrds, Mike the libel by a distast pew.
relation. Bet the greet question wee, in the Inn In-
it loedithe' men •!With irons ,wbe seek 'merely
chaqged with publishing a political libel.-4-(llsar. )1
si
This outrage was so monstroes, diet but a few y - 1
ago no man would bate 'believed tech as occerre , I
could have taken -place. The Meetber foe I ~1
ceshire (Mr. Blackburn.) bad, in titer excalpatoepl
letter,(as he called it) which he read, gently allud4
to this treatment, by reading that the parties wire
sent to -prison " With the 'axial precantions."e-e
[Hear, hear!]—The Hew. and Learned Gentleman
had called these libels blasphemous; he (Sir Samuel)
did not like to hear such a term applied to those pro.
dactions, because 'lt was dot warranted by law.—
They were certainly, to saytheleast of them, very
reprehensible—to parody' the sacred puts of tote
Liturgy, was an istromely bad form for the writer
to convey his destetation- .of corrupt practices-4
could not be justified, but it was not yet blasphemous
in a legal sense. Knowing the liberal sentiments
which his Hon. and Learned Friend held in early
life, end be hoped still held; it Was astonishing' hew
he could have so slightly touched on the real oppres-
sioo disclosed in these cues—be was astonished how
he could have listened without Migration at the
*Yews! by Magistrates, that they sent a man charged
with a political offence to prison in irons, before his
trial. To say that they had acted thus, because he
had published whet was proweenced a libel, was to
say nothing ; for 'some excellent prodections had
fallen under that title,, not Weed in the opinions of
country Magistrates, but according to the declare.
tions of leading Crown Lawyers—such, for instance,
had been the case io the respectful Petition of the
Bishops in •the time of James 11.---[Hear, hear !r—
See the situation in which the liberty of the subject
must stand, if Magistrates had the power of tiros
putting persons, in the first instance, in irons, and
sending them to jail like convicted felons.
Mr. BLACKBURNE here rose to say, that he
had not admitted they were so sent. The lion. Gen-
Oman then referred to the letter which belted pre-
viously read, and repeated, that the persons had been
sent to the workhouse, where they were placed by
the fire-side merely with a chain round their legs to
prevent their escape.--[Hear, hear! from Sir S.
Rurally]
Sir S. ROM ILLY.—" That is what I ellode to ;
and did not the lion. Member read from the other
letter, that they were sent to Preston J4ll • with the•
usual precautions,' end were net these precautions
irons ?"—( Hear!)
Mr. BLACKBURNEedeuttet‘that be had read
such SO extract.—(!fear l) . • '3 .'
Sir S. ROMILLY then reiiited, end said, that
was precisely what he had been arguing upon., Hi
denied the power of the Magistrates to commit such
an outrage. The single question was, whether the
House could hear such a doctrine without in
dignation ; or whether, having heard, they could al-
low the matter to rest without further enquiry:
If they dill, what would their Constituents think of
such an abandonment of public duty ?—(Hear!)—
His lion. and Learned Friend had also but slightly
glanced at the seizure of Swindell's papers. Now
whatever difference of opinion lawyers may hold on
a number of points, on this, relative to the seizure of
private papers to take out evidence against en indivi-
dual, he did not believe there had been a dissentient
voice since Lord Camden's celebrated decision con.
demnatory of such a practice. It was both illegal
and disgraceful, and entirely arose out of Lord Sid-
mouth's Letter, enclosing the opinions of the Attor-
ney and Solicitor-General to whet the zeal of the lo-
cal authorities in their several districts. The conse-
quence of it in this particular instance was, that the
ignorant individual sent forth to hunt for libels, dis-
covered in one man custody a volume of Rollin's
Ancient History, Law's Serious Call upon Good
Christians, and 77is Evangelical Magazine—all of
which, on the maxim of noscitur a sociis, were seized
and carried off, because they were found on the same
shelf with the Liverpool Mercury, and some num-
bers of Cobbett's works.—P laugh 1--If such
a practice were tolerated, no man would dare, like
Sydney, to put his thoughts to psper on the public
transactions of Government. The facts, it was said,
were denied. Where, be would ask, was this denial
to be found ? Was it not admitted, that the persons
were put in irons before the Magistrates, and their
papers seized : The other-pasta- egee,•it was true,
in some instances coetradieted ; but he sew no reason
why the statement of the oppressed thoidd not receive
as mach credence as that of the oppressor ; indeed,
aunt as it would seem in political Uses, the former
was usually believed in preference—fllear,'hier!]
and the zeal of those who time forward to contradict
what the Petitioners had asserted, might in some de-
gree be estimated, when some of them had the her-
dihood to swede that neither Swindells nor his. wife
" had made complaints to any persons whatsoever."
,The Hon. and Learned Gehtteitan concluded by
~warmly calling triton the Hsteitoto consider the situ-
ation io which the liberty of the' subject would be
placed Woos of this kind were tolerated, and if the
People of the country were to be told that that
House would not deign even to enquire into so
heinous an abuse.—[Hear!]
Mr. BRAGGE BATHURST said, be thought his
Hon. and Learned Friend had shown from the tau,
that the Magistrates were quite justified in sending
the persons alluded to to the Correction House, and
that such 'had bees the, practice in Lancashire.—
Though papers had -been seised, the persons who
seized them had not gone for that peepoee, and be
thought they were oat to be blessed, considering the
alarm into which the country was thrown at the time.
Ile deoied that them waseity booecessery or excel-. '
sive severity used. Nothing had been done but what
the law allowed ; and complaints therefore ought 1_

hal
therefore,. no nem
farSithrerSe."RuoilLbLyr a Candn!rn Mr. litie..Baadolll4.
motifturs:ilLyoescpßland.
niAeirr *emote
it
privioiri
the (louse the grounds on which he meant
to
vote. lie west& not enter foto- eny &seem
the leptiity or illegality of the prosecution 001
allowed,htni eoe ni "oe ocip to
t.vu evoeong light
ael
laelfslohipreah
tnehdi :eel eotituttoshhi
that
otor rni
h7liyotr
hart
2,
bb iwe
e werehcareino les
ei Ili
il ill :11,
ld
ne c ab
bdui6bs ee:ohnne oppressivelyta r believedyb i that ando
tg
ft m: imp
the prosecotioonb
e
ci nosntdftiluetteedd,. o r
he
publications ought to be repressed by the s
cheeks-of law, and'he s*w every degree of fen
humanity in the oonduct of the Law Officer,
Crown, in -persoieg the legal steps to tepee.
So sensible wm.the author (Mr. Hone). of
these libels of their immoral end irreligieemee
'that thotigh acquitted by a Jury, he had Ishi
them from efrculslists, a el rcu mifen ce which 1
Lociart) was glad to see. • The Attorney.(
haj done nothing but his dety, and he woe
support the motion on auir grounds of milli
'•against him : bet the 'pee 2f irons to confine a
cited of publishing libelee or of commiltini
offences under the nawieiof misdemealionrs, d
ed investigation sad e.esterettion, and on 'bet
he would vote for the.proposed enquiry into tl
bereaddecod.• He thought it contrary to the IA
Constitution of this country—a practice uni
by O'er anceitore—X practice thet.had,lately c
and which, if not corrected, 'might lead. to gi
pression—to inflict such a mark of ignominy,
posing irons, as on cent/eon felons; on the
were charged with misdetneenours. • As the
therefore, had got this specific case before the
ought to inveitigate its, for the purpose of GPI
gineral remedy, for the purpose of correctil
•uppeslred to him to be a vinfetion of the law
land. It ought to be recollected, that pent
hid committed misdemeanours bad been guilty
minor offences,. eod .that the punishment
awaited conviction was generally of en sligh
tore as to excite no fears that they would ens
to escape before trial. it was not necessary
fore, to .pnt them in irons to order to keep
safe custody; and as safe estetedy, and not
ment, was the ground on which the use
could be justified, in the case of men who et
vicied of no otrenins such a practice ought,n
resorted to for Misdegneanoeis.. Another res.
against the piacti,Fe was to he found, in the
the offeoces themselves, which were often
definite as not to be .accurately determined
trial. • Where crimes wera.commiqed against
that were iceerasoly defined .by law, the 01
was slot Ise'. Wong against any means
tention : bet it" appeitrid hard and op'
to iron, like fever. roysons who min
found by a Jury to have committed no-a
though fhe facts for Which they were imprisons
proved against them. This 'reasoning applies
strongly to persons charged with abases of the
than to persona accused -of other kinds of
meanours. The Press was a powerful engin
being capable of producing as great mischief
elegy 'when misdirected as benefit when prows
tinged, its abuses required to be watched and ci
but offences of this nature were freqoestl
undefined ; and it appeared monstrous to in*
power of punishing like felons, persons • wh
fences might depend on the impressions.of Judi
In proportion to the uncertainty of the lie
point, ought to be the leniency with which
sons accused of breaking it ought to be tr.;
fore conviction. To treat those charged wi
fishing libels like common felons, or perm
demised for offences—to degrade them by is
meat in irons—to drag theta from place tr
chained like criminals who hid violated II
sacred laws of society, appeared to him to be
and oppression, which demanded enquiry a
section. On those grounds he would sopc
motion, and he thought by doing so that he
forming n duty•which he owed to the laws
Constitution of his country, of which be cc
this practice was a violation —[hear'.]
Mr. BEN N Err made a short reply, in tin
of •hich he observed, that no attempt white
'well nada •to tillittf*the facts of the case ; as
ed that, should his motion be negatived, the
would not fail to remark, that one of the last
the present Housel 44 Commons was, to ral
quiry into a cash Mich was manifestly agt
lation of law. • • •
The House then divided—
For the in 400,4: . • • - .
• Aphis( it (eel i,„i , 7!
114jority
• NABOB OF THE CARNATIC.
s4Mr. MARSH, after detailing, at cansi
:issegth, the history of the demands in q
moved for the appointment of a Select Coo
in enquire into the claims of certain creditor
Nabob of the Csrnatic.
Mi. CANNING thought it highly imp
'that those Gentlemen could go on advancing
to one of the Native Princes in Ignorance of.
of .1797. He had 'no objection to the appoi
of the Committee, but wished to guard hicriself
any ptedge as to the measure which they m

cots ere ad.
After a few words from M.r. Grant, Mr.!
Onslow, Mr. W. Smith, and •Mr. Marsh, the
was agreed to, and the Committee appointed.
The Saving Banks Bill Was read a third t
pawed.
'The Irish Assessed Tates Bill and the I
Kent's Anneity Bill weed through the Cam
and the Broom were ordered to be ree.ei
sorrow. • • •
The Lottery Bill and the Irish Bank Re'
Bill were read each a second time, and orders
eiwismitted toonereow.
The other. Orden.' Of the y were then d
as after which the House adjourned at L 2 o'l

. , , jr.....
. - •
goiit
loos m .
rtes
of 4g Nor, 4,..,s ,- • 6, be diretted ags itist th-------e eslitt ;ace of
.khe. •'' '
. - -
•
5r.au5ak.r..1...;.......----""--"---"-"- 7
M to. Milting irons in otter bases ralrte•-e
lons' company and Mom' fare. lie attached Ise ,in this instance, if he had been at ell
t,--- . - ' Hionthe* eAndatzke j-
---01: 1' ..ti ilo'n:tiopand othetinistrantloongrioun tnhosseob:ilit,:
blame to she jailer; the blame belonged entirely to ! . * i
„, 111 iota eo 41,4'
the two Magistva tea. T hear two mess, who it seemed i,, 1 14 • W ,A to
wired before h' r to - kin tine that required to be knOwn willetohretei;llantrtethl4dAylilliller
A lm ' tra "'
a"
'm - • had " fare saw d f 7 • "se'
He
r , .- 1:
were in he treated with the same persecuting spirit i be ' ._,Li , , ,4 t „ wall a- , .0,,,/ v
House, and there was, therefore,, no net",
whirl, the Government bad manifested in the cassia, .h. t.n time ~ , . :, . lit .. sin r ' ' I it
Mr. ilone. were removed in an (men cart, handcuff. meet to the Grand Jury et die Quarter Session, who 'object, and when be bad mkt, 1_,A.1.L.,......,,bad!ar!f_1a!j.

1
ad together, and, in the company of several othererfteatirellVllMlSilltrfriallienflitAilt Alai
teat, telcolg 18 miles to trial. The other persons the nature of the charge itistriack billy ill* a chairips tie
ski
A i.„wilb Whom fry,wore out might he awn who had of publishing a libel of this nature ought rathei to be were
. • s-olfsegipiaiffretnaw,e, volloo, ~..tAii, Gositte..4tailLibetase the iimiteirei-414.1egleysisiVrsifaits !be ft- tut
man in the habit of visiting prisons moat know that local jurisdiction, he therefore relSeftedltite cue by ease
• ---oeimia...aake _naan_lnifiriaahauut &lamas-foe imisciecaos" .certiorari• Redacting on the del*? whit* this wowid the 4

se.POlßplielsonal, who' d
oeitithe door, or the
0/011 lbropit,s, he tame
3;4.4 reShod in I
.mt oil h iciajed in i
711#1 i?,esery part, Is
+-- I .., then tore op,
pi.' ..oit of thelli.,4
• A,9 ,tpioperty As
.i 4 d„.*riir of the w,
r ties,that .she ' no
he the 25th
~41, 114 chi1d,,,,..t and on'
,_,Altyt. of ay, tho chi
. , "option of its mother,
fer • If, after suffering TA
.. .
without basin
, imtate,..s m.as another jai
, 1.11, pfjitsty% Govern
tient liken up withou
;A 1 A d
sir„,ft , )1 are_ witho
0 hear k?ormence. Sec
4*
.1i). tp make a Very pa
s&A'tha'l!!ople. He It
41-071onie, that the Ind'
14diierlin,d was an oki
• years JO the.sereice, 1
• 11n‘rO. 4, VIPP d° P.
Breit.' Ho *Oil id n
ouppospoishat the Pet
theix 'ltelernente, tht
toed serious etleolion
back 'to their conetitu
them' with the stigma