The Statesman.
London, England, 1814-05-06 00:00:00

. • .

• ';;t'

:~

11_ ;,;.,

1;4:. 7§TAIv.PAi A lii

i; '. r

explanation." The Prosecutor still refused
this, and the Defendant then gently laid a Iv
across his shoulders. The Defendant, in his
in mitigation of punishment, said, that he
the avenues of the House of Commons,
Mr..Cochrane.Johustone from committing
upon the Prosecutor, for language use
!Oust that Gentleman; and that a true
dictment for perjury had beefs found, agait
the witnesses who contradicted tits father.
While the Defendant's ntfidevits were being
Lord ELL;NBOROUGIL. ceniared them for
ing the Defendanth.tatiting..with -the Prosecu
Chancery tine siithse hirrse-sehils,to accident
also clear, that the Defee'dant'a rengeance off
by what fell from the Preoeititor before
mittee, and not br what pima aTterwaks.
Mr. ATTOILNEY4EXESAIG and Mr. SQ.I.
dressed the CO-a-tin .siiiiiOrt it attilifisilica
i former insisted that the Ditfelodant had nr
overhear what passed hegstetO. the7Proieci
any other person relative to hia prefessioir
of a witness's evidence : the latter urged
slant's adroitness in waiting till after Trl
i before he committed the assault,.thotothb ...
i might go the Western Circuit, and witness
I' feudaut's triumph, before. lop could. obtaia
I mation.
Mr. n
! A
allipTT and Mr. 11. eitOPER adds
Court in mitigation of puthishment. The
having said, that the Defendatit had hien
willing to refer the matter-to any private profess((
arbitration.
Lord EGLENZOILOUGII observed. that no
1 disclosed that fact, or that his Conduct -
since. If the outrage had been the effect'
warmth, it would have come before the I
more venial shape ; but recollect the fottr
Mr. Justice LE BLANC, itv pronouncing _ jude
ment of the Court, observed, that 'the Defendant's
first application to the Prosecutor was not '
member of the profession to soothe his feel
i
; through a military Gentleman, who desired '
•
tutor to name his friend if he would nok.
! Defendant an explanation; and the second
1 tion through Mr. Abraham most- necessar
(erred to tills arst step. .The Court were
upon .to say what would be the result of
I.dart's application: to be advanced to- that
tivuk of the profession for which he was a
' bet unless his temper of mind experienced , __
[tilteratitm' that rank would not be materially
adorned by his accession to it. The *entente of the
Court- was, that the Defendant should be committal.
to the custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsea of
1 the Court for six months, and find security forhis
good behaviour for five years afterwards, himself in
5001. alai two sureties in t.).501. each.

ed to give
horse-whip , •
0
his affidavit d
he had,
prevented
an assault
et!' by hk
hilt of in.
inst omelet
eing rad,
or attribute
.oseeetnr
fent. it eye
Was excite`
the Coen&
s._
taLETT
reafrorrthe
to right to -
ecotor and
sal opinion
the Dfen-
inity Term
Prosecutor
ess the Di* 4
SA i4far-
4tiesed the
the former
eon *lmp
professional
tL.
no Admit
WAS altered
r of sudden -
Court in it
• months.
1g the luck.
Defendant's
t through-a
eelings, bit
d the Prose- 1
of site ttut
,lid applies:
tdtily belt-
!otwtheeettpehciagfluhticier.
candidate; I
cell a great I
materially
tenee of the
aMfrimittail