The Statesman.
London, England, 1814-07-06 00:00:00

that it came from De BerengAr. My statement, was,
that while I was superintending work at Mr. King'.s
manufactory, I received a note, but did
_not know
that it came from De Berenger, because the name
was written so close to the bottom, that I could not
read it. It was triumphantly remarked, that this note

fh favi

was not forthcoming. It was mentioned as a suspicious
circumstance, that i could not produce this note.— . _ warned Judge eke _ *description., commend
The fact is, that II re it, and threw it down. I had the probability, _y, slated 'that it .1141 a. ; upheaved before me .my _ t . _ semi
nokt anapest idea tbat it.saas,artath .presarving— possible, that I should hat..,.,, ruVieaul of his illness on breary, has excited much solosttlyere*. _WO* I, ill private
a notetst merely soliciting an interview which I was the 17th of February ! •, , , . swore, Alit he wore •ts, green sestOlie Counsel for me that I
A,.
e..-neeedietallesehltee-geasst.-- What atould it contain When it is considered aw Laid lilleebeceugh the Prosecution declared that I-had incurred- the mo. ' p!lr and
that the writer himself could not .ittformene oil— admitted that. evidence of the illness of my brother
~ret guilt of perjury without esirjeattnimaysaivio the bte urged
For what purpose should I preserve it ? If I had would add islet probability to my steimpent, that legal, penalty. Wain I tomeintu Courtand repent. 1 ifigiltrii
preserved it., -if -L had brought it ferth—What would on hearing of Odorant of an officer from the army, ed my assertion upon oath, undettalt thoseisktokthel DOtenta
law, aud tendered the atildavits of °dela othstiame.l44
lir,' ,
hese been said?. Why, Sir, that there could not be a I went homnsrith the expectation of hearing distres-
more suspicious circumstance—that E could never sing intelligence respecting him, and that such eri- him, tut I. did, in jib; green coat -at my ha* Itbe leil. P3°l.
have been so careful of an apparently insignificant deuce would, indeed,,be important, is it not strange same. Cotiosof impodentlrreposatedThe ftekrosiid Wee .aal4 he ilitti,
screp of paper, if I had not (encase that it might that he should, bate rejected such evidence without accusation. I also affirmed, upon my Iminotie, iti-I desired him
one day be called in question, or otherwise that it examination—or, with no little examination, as-to the Court of King's Bellwood 1 do.berigurinAnt . Between
bad been subsequently fabricated. . confound both dates and mode of conveyance? honour in this flouse,',lnationly•saw bim in a.green sum whiA
l have to lament that I was not more particular as With respect to my accoent of the conversation coat. • ~i L. - , , „. •,... , `coast, wIC
to the important fact of my going away from the I which passed.. between Dis Beringer and myself, I I have alqeady statetp that an error- of- the most trout, amouel
!Amp-maker's, under the impression that I was submit to the House, theteit is not only trues but dangerous maws was intioduced into the;bcief. ,lo . disinterest/4n
:
about to meet en officer with distressing intelligence perfectly probable. It was, not necessary that I i that brief the coat of De,.ll4seenger. is described to ;orb:Prot
..
4,
relative to my brother the Hon. Major Cochrane. I should know the busines* which De Benner had have been a red one with &green colitis and my vows- I now
can now only supply the deficiency, by offering. the 11-.- been transacting, in order 40.. believe that he had,, /AU consequence admitted that tobe red, which bad.cfere 1 whornAte4lll
same statement and the same evidence which I ten- reasons for wishing to quit the kingdom. His wish I 5„,.... sworn to be green. .My atteatiorewaspow call- ',Teit tl. ed
tiered to the Court of King's Bench when I made my Ito go to America, and Sir Alexander Cochrane's ap. oleo this error or clifferenee which has bees so fatal, naiim of
second application for a new triul. I then observedslplication in his behalf, were known to me, and and Mr. Seijeant illest,ls the course of my defence I lion of the
t 4 that I was in apprehensions of fatal news respect- I clearly proved on the trial; and the Prosecutor's :marked the contradiction betweeer my affidavit linti ! he 'urged,
1
ing my brother then in France, from whom I had I Counsel admitted that De Berenger was,lo the rules what his brief told him, and begat. me Credit torso coon my
received a letter but three days before, with the in- : of the King's. Bench, and so Involved indebt,
that; oversight In eoneequence thereof, but refused to tie. -hours tit
t elligence of his being dangerously ill ; and I now Ihe would rather reside in any country. than this.-1 mine my servants then ready in attehdance. Early that Coo
tender you his affidavit, with the surgeon's certifi- I Within these few days, a letter from De Revenger to on the morning of the second day of the trial being whenithir
rate, dated the 12th of February, which he brought i his Solicitor, Mr. Gabriel Tahourdin, has come into , informed, to my.surprise, of -the mode of defence of such w'
home with him • and, therefore, on receiving the my possession, which clearly proves the distressed I which had been resorted to, I again sent my servants, heard tot
note from De Berenger, whose name I was unable state of his mind, and his anxiety to get out of the . to Guildhall with a note to my Solid or, of which the sal being
to decipher; and as that note announced that the country. The letter is dated the 17th of Fehr:lo3ll . following is an extract : morning,
writer, who, I learnt from my servant, had the up- scan days previous to the fraud of the 21st. The L 4. June 9. 1814. rating th
" nisi 11ia,71 have seat my servants, who, I submit,
pearance of an officer in the army, was desirous of letter is long, and, to me perfectly unintelligible : I
ingtis eK
• to be examined, in order to prove the appearance of be- '
seeing me, I hastened to learn intelligence so anal- the following passage shows the perturbed state of , reaper. This seems necessary so free me from the internal us-
sary s Ad
ously expected; nor had 1 the least doubt that it re. his mind:— 1 easiness which 1 should ever feel were the investigation toter- great td,
i
lated to my brother. When, however, I found that ccl cannot refrain from pressing you, as my So- minute otherwise." and to
the person was De Berenger, and that he had only licitor, and as a confidential friend, to take imme- i Still, Sir, it was not deemed proper to examine my been urged
to speak of his own private affairs, the apparent dis- diately those measures, which alone can tranquillize , servants, and to the error which crept into the brief, thee 'hisp,
tress he was in, and the relief it gave my mind to !my mind, and enable me thereby to meet the nu- and thesconsequent mitapprehansion of my Counsel, Najaf ,
know that he was not the bearer of the news I : merous sufferings I am doomed to bear. Something I must in some measure attribute the unfavourable re- paid to 0,,
~ ,
dreaded, prevented me from feeling that displeasure must be done, for what is so harassing as doubt suit of the trial. .. thitt deflOr
while the
which I might otherwise have felt at the liberty he, about future fate ? Mine is all gloom ; and self. ! Abottt half-past seven o'cloek. on the evening of
en the part of my , aciused,
had taken, or the interruption it had occasioned. ! preservation, that powerful argument, but which I the last day of the trial, a Clerk
Comments have been made on my saying so little to i have so long neglected, and which every body, more Solicitois called upon me, and 'the following is a me- I was co*,
the servant who brought me that note ; but the fact; or less, seems to use, requires my immediate and : morandum made by him of the conversation that took 'by seeing
was
his I did ask him several questions, as appears by ! unalterable decision. I have refused what most place between us In consequence : J mach
his affidavit. That I did not. learn the name of the' people would call the safe side of the question.— I' " I told Lord Cochrane I had just come out of Court to pre. the Verdi
pare him wzersittuesult,
4asi theiiJuleh.tcas summing
dup
writer from the note itself, I have truly accounted 1 What are my prospects in consequence ? that ,I ;hallLord
for, by its being written so close to the bottom of ! have enemies in abundance,—that I shall, In ,either, of Mr. hi ,a
ID rougeHtn. recontnewoldine. ehisveLordslailsmlre4"a= marked,
the paper that I could not read it. This assertion is , result, have lost all chance of encouragement, per, , acquainted with the result to be apprehended. He enquired I first connected
said to be contradicted by the circumstance of the i haps in all Europe, and that I shall be tossed about, ' em,:ilfelildanban riststetriall toldb l'hinira`Catelawll aroantel wakresmsesonhta: been
transacts
writer having found room to add a postscript, as if , God knows how and where, and at an age which , Major Cochrrew's illness, nod same otners„ ire eoqualn);.lC mat knir
there was only one side to the paper. Of the post. I claims rest: and horrible as the picture is, it is even . Monti, Turpin' was called. I answered not—tie said Mr. l!twitin.
.fitillehiti
script I have no. recollection, but it might have been : the best of the prospects that await me ;—for should son ita waspai creel to in his
case, or
requestedth he had botched khehr 2;7 41faea ' :
written even opposite the signature. That I did not Ithe trial go against me, my fate is not branded by , might to have called her to prove Herenger's dreost-I told him iturtiishekef
foe. 0.400 rs of a , his letter WWI submitted to collar!, aio the messurenot approv-
collect from the hand-writing that it was addressed to , disgrace and punishment only ;! letsb6rissikir
I iedof by theas-he answered, Mr. P. should have done us I
fastAl_,„l -
me by Berenger, is nothing extraordinary ; my ac.' prison will close upon me for life." instructed hi., 1 am to he the only wagerer if convicted...4' Oiul•.'
qaeintance with that person was extremely slight; I After the apprehension of Mr. De Berenger, I did, ; also told himsthat at the time his Lordship's lesser was we lied iportgki
and till that day I had never received more than one i by the advice of Mr. Johnstone, address to him a I hill raise w" cl"*".( nity eta
(Signed) " 11. M. COULTHURSIP; -
or two notes from him, which related to a draw.. 1 letter through the ace of Lord Sithnouth, calling 10th Just, 1811." I Why I CI.
in of a larnp.--I was too deeply impressed upon him to state to the public his reasons for corns e explained,
I read this/ Sir: to show to the House Irearairritte 1
with this idea, that the note was addressed to me by ing to my house on the 21st of February,—and he 1
OM I was to the very last moment, that servants Fos
an officer who had come with intelligence of my answered that " his object was corredtly detailed . . my. . - ' 'dectiiii
should be examined. Had they been examined. ey •.,..._
brother, to apprehend that it was written by De in my affidavit." I hold his original letter in my : t . . o-uie colt'
i woultUtaxe.sworn to_thealeess ia.which De• 4, a,
I3erenger, from whom I expected no communication, ; hand. . •-,,,, -nll ou'
I came tautly house.
and with whose hand-writing I was not familiar.-1 Relying upon the diference of the dreUs in which ' . ~ .. thing to
All that I could afterwards recollect of the note, .De Berenger appeared before me from that described I And I submit, whether the testimony of all thett Opplication to oin. my without leave from the
'lllle. , Alietiral--.
more than what is stated in my affidasit, is, that he by the Stock Exchange Committee, and on the asses. !pertons ought not to preponderate over that of ea If' lsid. had .the lelst reason to wish for
had something to communicate which would affect . ance of Mr. Johnstone that De.B. bad informed him i The only witness to the point of De Berenger's chm-1 his coneealineatvrCOtild easily have smuggled him.
my feeling mind, or words to that effect, which cost- that he could unequivocally prove an alibibyat least a ill to my house in a red coat is Crane, the hackney t into the Torment. But it is obvious that I had no
firmed my apprehensions that the writer was themes. . dozen credible witnesaes, and believing that, at all ' coachman. And under what circumstances was his ;.such intention. .
' evidence given. Not one of the Counsel for thepro- I
senger of fatal news of my brother." , teveists, my own innocence would prove my protec- , , , 1 Why did Lord_Ellenborough, in his charge to ibis
My Brother's Affidavit is as follows: tion, I felt so perfectly secure as to the issue of the , secution ventured to question him to the point : but Jury (continued his Lordship) take one part of my
" The lion. William Erskine Cochrane, Major in the 15tb , tilt', that I gave no instructions to Gemmel, attended on his cross-examination being asked the following affidavit as true, and another as false ?—lle professes
regiment of dragoons, now residing in Portman-square, in the
.241 '
, consultation, and never even read my Own brief, I questions
" You do not pretend tio be able td recol= ito quote from my affidavit as flight Asetis of my fur.
county of Middle-ex, no his oath, milli, that he was seized re I " tact ever arry Inyour hackne - ' • •
with a violent and alarming illness on the Ist of January, 1814, into which a fatal error was introduced ; but leaving cc y pers,o"n you C.
,4 y 1 nishing De 13erenger with a coat to; wear instead of
nt Candor', to the south of France, sod that this Deponent re- • the whole business entirely in the hands of my So- i coach every day . He replied, No, but this geti- his uniform : and puts it to the Jury to consider,
rosined in a state of danger.m4 Unless until the 18th of the fol. ' I • . " tleman that I took from a post-chaise. and four ti
loss Ina month ; that early in February last he wrote to his ! licitor, retired to my house in the country, and 10 . . ~. . ~ I whether a -mite coming so disgisieed,.44apeiog
brother, Lord Cochrane, to acquaint his Lordship with this ; did not return till two days previous to the trial. 1 whets ne got out at careen-street, l saw that he had
; away again with his disguise in a bundle, was nistAnn
Deponent's situation, as Deposleat had then very little hope of ! While in the country 1 received a letter from my I" a red coat underneath his great coat." Does it i dishonest errand ?"—ln all this Lord Ellenbotausli
recovery, and telling hint that he load received a notification not appear from this answer that the witness
thnt he would he ordered to England, where be should proceed, I Solicitor, informing me, that at a consultation, it had 1
if ever able to undertake the journey. Anti this Deponent been resolved to defend my case jointly with that of ; having been disappointed in not being questioned ; affidavit; and he represents me as acknowiedgmg
further caith, that the onsieled certificate was given to him for NI B i 'to that point before, speaks to it now as his only1
r. ut , and that it was not determined whether it I
the purpose of being laid oflieially Ware a Board of Medical
()rimers of St. Jean de Luz. by the sargem ()flirts Depsoent's ' might not also be advisable to unite it with that off chance of securing the reward of 2501. offered by 1 guised ; and going away again with his disguise
regiment, trod is in the s.ticl surgeon's hand-wriiing." i Mr. Johnstone. I had ordered that my case should ' the Stock Exchange, and which, I understand, he ''a bundle !—lf there be one word of this in my -
From the certificate of the Surgeon,deted the 12th .be defended separately, and Messrs. Topping and ' has laid claim to. With respect to the evidence : davit, then lam perjured, and Lord Elleaberoesla
of February, I think it material to read the following i Scarlett were engaged as my Counsel. To the above ;of Crane, it is worthy of notice, that the great : speaks truth. I stated, that De Berenger, an ,
eatracts:—" Major Cochrane was seized with the . communication, I returned the following answer :--1 coat which I have sworn as grey, was described by lin it rifle corps, called upon me its a grass •
vanal.symptoms of fever on the Ist of January, which " lloily.Hill, Titchtield, May 99. 1814. I him in his examination before the Stock Exchange and this, the Judge.submits to the Jury, hi-
wee continued for the first three ileys, then the re. " The Caunse.l are better able to judge than lamas to the ' Committee to have been a brown one; but on the . • 144
newish). of mixt% Mr. !tun% case ,VIM mint, --1 IN bat I ill net .1 gurse, . a proof of his coming on' a dishonest
niittent character developed itself ; the evessieg trial be meets my description, and calls it's brawn-
: ;con to any former onion.' i rand 1.
paroxysm was severe every (ley, andhe was all through i ! grey: he also described De Berenger as a red-faced * * * C
i N..' • h d* otwit stan tug this m case was defended con-
nisch worse on the third day than on the two pre- * 1 y , man. Shilling also stated before the. Committee, cc, er- •
ceding days. Oa thelid, he had " a crisis, ond went ,
. jointlz, .and it deserves particular attention, that the
. that De Berenger had a large 'red nose, and ace.;f • eLseing hunted down ;the game," corsitia.
''
.'able Co tel who leaded a uis pmy cause was intended toChief Justice " the prosecutors at last showed
on very well till the Ist of February, while be suffer. rather •
blotched: Now, it is well known, that De ' became of hi:skin. A d 'AI
a it a a very. miters—
defend Mr. Johnstone only, and that the Counsel .
ed a relapse, attended with rethoralarmieg symptoms. lien3nger bears no resemblance to such description.'
- that the
~ There was aria deterininatied to the"-baldands whom I did employs bad no opportunity of owing Ho tr, --7--
ram, masked with the small-pox, and Ain : ceehrenee... ..erh - • fie jr - seams
y u indreffo
$ 1 their lips. The unavailing expression of my Assent
-- . from blotches.
tendency to coma. On the morning of the 7th he
had a second relapse, I hope the change' f •.o air anti $ , to an union of cases, was almost the only step taken I Out, Sir, I have another fletetrseite ' i
~,. 1, else of those feet', which a guilty man woe!,
objects will serve him." by me in my own behalf in the whole course of the .
I proceedings prior to my return to town; for,
to Crane, and I call upon the Misuse, to give it that)
,• F most anxious to conceals and. since this
Whit lect ;Lever could have been, known if -
The affidavit of my brother, as :walla; the certifi. , 41' attention which it deserves. Atilt` e moment, Si'r,,tlytt,i Cechmne) had not voluntarily divulged it, it is
cite of the Surgeon, were treated as fabric&
_ t.
.: addition to the perfect consciousness of my innocence, ' chit • was giving d ' • _ evi tout which was to ,cruift 1
ad with rases,. •'' I cannot help remarking, that Mr. Johnstone, on ° •important as Ish* strong presumptivep'
, ,rn mg . _ g
me the crimes of fraud And ' 'he -*as se- i -sv innocence. , then

and with respect to my brother's letter, the Judge
would hOt believtuthat I bad received it, unless I,
could produce it, and show hina the post-mark. It
is known to all my friends, that I seldom preserve I
such letters as are not likely to be of future import.
ance—but it was also known to many of my friends,
that I had received such a letter. And since my
hrother Colonel Cochrane's return from Ireland, I
have learnt that he did actually receive the letter ea.l
closed from me ; and he is ready to prove it ; aad
my other brother, Major Cochrane, has sworn to the
fact of having sent it. The Learned Judges would
not believe there was time for the- arrival of such
letter between the 12th a►ul,l6th of February : but,
I did not speak to the date of the letter. I Only;
skid,-that 1 received it ou the 18;h: sled my brother
did not swear that it wae.writtes, en the 12th, bat
early in February. Now I expressly stated, that,
say brother bought the certificate home with bies.•.--

man
_ . perjury" . w stif- tmy ini
of[llls Lordship , takes eel
all occasions, was anxious to relieve mefront the
, feringthe sentence of the law for contract of no to,tn, tached parts of Lord Ellenhorough's charge,
trouble of attending to my ewn interests in this Ina" ! nton atrocity. The account of this conduct, I, 41114 Trbich he remarks with great freedom of iitvecti
ter; and in a letter, which he wrote I. me a few raid to the House, at' it was detailed its th.tipofilli This we must pass over, for the reasons before
days previous to the trial, he intreeted me to snake papers i.,.....
t 1.... nett]'• • ~ ;11-.:1•
myself perfectly easy as to the issue, stud informed "On Friday last William Crane, the driver 0, i . His !Ara cipaplained that it was not stated to
me he had seen De Berengees brief, by which it ap. the hechney-coach No., 782, was summoned before • jury, that he was from home. two hours after
peered, that he would fully establish by alibi. This the Comidssioneri, upon a charge of cruelty to, his Berenger called; . wlio had consequently
letter, pursuant to my general practice" *ell known horses.' ?she eireumetalwes detailed were so shock. chkilke l'ilkariiitOtod had ti pittrimainteau with ,
to my friends, I believe I have destroyed; bet the fog 48 inder;e,d the Commissioners to. observe,
•.0.4 . carry off his disguise; the same probably in whit
receipt and purport of it can be proved on oath by a i acoatheard a more atrocious case." .: . „, . carried it,tirDever : that he (Lord C. first disclosed
visitor then at my house. - .
Now" Sir,- A ask, continued his o s I.• 4.00 4
On my return to town, immediately before the I, le the the fact of Do Bereuger's coming to his house,
evidence of' an old and faithful servant, whOias been On the preiteedings that took place after the
trial, the brief of Mr. De Berengrr Was shows to !in one foroil,, 11 years, .together with tht.ietidence 'his Lordship; said,—l did think, that as
me by Mr. Johnstone ; and the case al therein I of. titres ith'er witnesses of ouitopeachedl.77:l•.
yv...p!.71,..,0,. nesses• who could materially hare contribtr
stated appeared to me so perfectly clear, t I
tea- - sa- rbpotwillhed in the balance by a. wretch; or oirs, . Prove my innooence of the charge had not'
lemnly -assure the House, that I then thought it 1 sawn? -
.. , . , ketitted ;land Sol could show that their not
impossible he could• be the person who represented 1 Z._ ..
Du Bourg. That I bid no coneern whatever se
the uu use subject of the .ifaissiid in De Be- examined originated in •errori and that such
alibi set up by 14?.; Seterenger, will renger's possessiao, whiek „Open- eschango fo was not my oho, that I had a just claim tr

riwas granted to him on the 12th of February by the
surgeon of his regiment, for the purpose of being
laid before a Board of bletfical ()deers to show the
necessity of his return to &Wend, where hearrivad;
some lime in March,*and noir resides in Portman-
square iu a very precarious stale of health. The att.

adicieetly
_ - -
appear from the felloliteig letter from my SAM-
ten
ideaehia4 tarpectch, W Jstly, 1114.
Iliw.Lottße—We beg is acinftelq* the recelgt of year
Leitlshier letter-of yetterany's date, sad to segos-Ent ydu in
mower slant we were certainly employed -eaeleelvely for your
Lortlibip In the late trial, sad ant !et -ally ether ef the Do

)11.
otkirs tbit had vice hedashis, his berdship pledged
himself to prom, that :they. were gjren by him to
Mr. Bete, for 60041* potent., for newel bor-
rowed, sorj to Messrs. Wilkins.° ead Crosthweite,
his Lordship's wine-merchants, hi whose cellars he
was engaged more than two hours, on the dai the
C•k\
•

trial. My first .application was rejected under
pretext of a Rule of Court—which is, that
Son, however innocent, if included •with o
au indictment ,fer a ecnspirem; aid if in. OW
culty of separating the cases arc condemned- stall
allowed a rehearing, unles ucatait his
N. • .
ViSa tvit•lA -

. .

1 "•

. -
TILL' STATESI46..
7s= r•—•-•".- ---
the n t icity of the certificate is nagaggtiessable• nd , &Waste irealtteit Ire to Ma:Te room es 1 . aud
110:14ntiz ;kir 1,... _.• .;-- -. -TT... To, rear 14pearrilt h r r" '
Iqf hie"
agl rt. '. Haab
71r- •. iitait Tv Fircer.
and
it
Ilitatiii et .rut hiss s 0 , Ze 'TA Counsel in rtII di
. ktnnity c
4r.
° °it (14°°10°° 't ° IlAeiftifis I°' ' * as 4 the witOraitt;' by whom it waslro bnenesnitaidished. P-
"1..'
. arose ft
nine days prior to the 21st of FebrnarY. It includes "We lave the honour to be, my Lord, &c. jOctobei
apal's! of six weeks, itampLy, irom4bsl,st at .11. ... , . ... . : .... 2,ZiaLlifi lLatal.Ca."..-. .. the fare
nuary : and yet the Lear-tied Judge *mined *pint *description-of the drsaak ,abicit De aerator commet
the probability, nay, slated 'that it .*tla almost Im• atitieareil before me at my hotWevi tke 21st of Fe. ' ment se

- •
. .
•
, 1
,as alleged to have been, plinned,' tasting
be Sent on board the Tonnant.
g mentioned Mr. Butt, I take this oppor.
f stating, that rhy connection with 'the funds
Dm a conversation with that gentleman in
last, when the 'progress of the Allies and
arable aspect of affairs induced him to re.
cl me to place my spare money In Qovrie.
~ .
:uties. I told him, ' that I had disponi& it
tte securities and land. lle then inform
I might 'gain without adva'trang the"pritier"
1 offered to conduct the bUsinees ter n)e.....,
Pd this proposal, which I then declined, be: .
illing to enter into speculations which I did
erstand.- .However, in tthe course of afsii
P -my very great surprise he brought me tj
1301. as the prOfit on .00pecalation which be
had, made for me. Nab wanting tge inoniiri
1 him to sport with it 101 he had lost it... 4,,,
t that period and the 19th of Febniary,
iclvhe bed gained fo
.4.101. placed to uptiiv,e'
without fes.or rewerd,,..oattwrithiput cOeto, .
mouoted to 441.091. ', ,Mijet Owe:
I,
!std. of W. Butt, WC I, tAio Miii 114 , .
.of
.st dishonourable attloor
i Coate, %IF; lii lite catitioaktit'the Judge be"
1018,411114M050 wks tree* ' The, ptdalic heal '..
dittoing (4'4kt VW:44
•40 doling. the examlir • '
d- the Witnesses. tioltri,the read
the House, is it lOU tfpsll of the ;public, t ' •
d, that he compelled AO Coousel to ant
F., defence lifter midbight.--at the and .ef . , .
rdm the commenc 'lt of the trials
unieYdeelkred hit,i',4 siiii,ezhaistecif ,ft
.i Jury who were to • ' were in *a.
weariness as tO tend. Ottedttou td what
Rally impossible. The .the Coal'"' '
fic
ended, .the Judgrot I' 'at throe in tar' .
t, adjourned the Ciiert 11 too ; thus se* '
,•
he evidence from . time argamili - and, reseila•
vsrit. strength and the,.st lir my Mir .. . .•'.
Advocate for the cleee;7lgl 11'16' both' ii* ~:'
04
dvantage of time, to Corot* tit ' itto ;, '
arrange erguMents to meet 'Vile ticb 'd '
fed b my defence. fly this means, o, a E
Ipoeteut object was secored. From the 1 e.. , •
tha 'hoar at which the Counsel were c
o eiitOi On. my defence, 'Wires' impossible that
(birder' &bilk' appear the belt day In pettitl ••
113 TOM+ of the Advocate by whOm I was
, .woultk appear at full ieneth,.. The object
eplitety atained; and thus were the pobqko
ng • hardly a. Word in my defence, white Pin
as urged agalilst mei, prepared to approvVet
lict which wasliven fhe neat clay.
I Ellenborough in bis charge to the Jury,, •
, that in my Affidavit or the:llth of Marc' .
onnected the name of Ile- entesith ti !
ion. It is true, that. t.'did sow ; . l.'the tut '
Dwn to 'Ws LortishiP, for he. happeerd 'it ii
e, quit *lien I gave ' it
.to be /doted; i 1,31 •
that, "Irileterigir. teas the impO4or, tit.
et the'' "'tae to hilti)eitien e'' and Lf:PrititU , • .
ueiV*Anot
.w.sitiatad bi hisinuattog; ',hull ' I
wilt' 41fier vieit,' tlitltt that justice itoto
• .
it him pf ailty, and to Ore Mitt on opportu-
camill,eithviardlo
.I'o4, ',WWI, if innocent. ,
..;oulif pa ta,ke.thia.step spelistc, I have already •
ed, .entf„ittilt *in' rept_i i itsil tint Stkationeut
Id 10 my Kt tit of 41St of June. is t
heels on ti(e7iiihject; eat is a coroplettansser
alothnj;tlesi I acted eh' the' suppOsltieet ;Obis
ileorthe tingdoln. I, at Waste- had dine ao..
it 6cittttlfilite to hls'eticape=l bait refyied his
•• .•

atrt4ooa
wiedffilig
entie 46-
arise is
I my ail-
tborostillai a
an awe-
stuforan ;
is a
load!**
•, •
lotto thie
wed what
rial fact,
fat Lord
tun it It
•uld hare
this ma-
r I (Loa
is chief,
proof of
?vend de.
a Oro, ore
rectire.-- I
;afore as.
ted to
after •
time to
Rh him t
which h
disclosed I
se.
the trial.)
the wit.,
btited to!
,t been osii
lot beio.,
loch error
to a neje:
under the
t no per-
others la,
• ifie:os*
ti 410140
suutosed_k,
1414
4