The Statesman.
London, England, 1819-11-18 00:00:00

might not be distracted and diverted to thosigtors
•hick should tel be entertained in such a place. The
Defenotant bred Omitted. that it was ringeler,a fter the
argeittal of Host, that be should be tried (or the
►arn► wort; bet it should be remembered, that a
Joey, in every rose, shoold only go open the 'vi-
olence before them; and if the argument were good
at all, it would held "gently where a coesiction had
ensued on the first trial, and an sr/seism' In another;
for the Jo►y were not to be told in the one case, that
ol.ey eyed to coodents Weans" another Je►y bred
foam! guilty ; nor ought they to be reminded to re.
tern a verdict of not guilty, becaose another Jary
had acquitted for t►e same offence. His Lordship
then 'diet led to, and regretted, the delay which bed
"muted in bringing the Defendant to trial—a cite
reoustanee which, he had no doubt, had occasioned
him condo:prairie trouble and "'pence. Ile lamented
extremely that the Gingkoes in Warwickshire who
had been semmotted to eased as 3p•del Jaren load
neglected Is do se, for be conceived that that defy
was one of the 'barges open property which ought to
be enforced. - _ _

Mr. Denman here addressed the Coed, dud hay.
ing apologised for luterreptieg his Lordship at such
a amateur, Wee to observe, that the trial was not
°stayed in the limo instance by the nou.atteaclance
of the Special Jury ; bet no record bad been with.
tame heron it came in.. Court.
Mr. Justice BAT LIT continusd..—Then, If so, the
ihsereatime ho bad aide would sot splay to that
care, sod he knew of no other; bet in any ONO Its
ronerreere, he should have felt it hie duty to have
Aerie the same or a similar result. With respect
in she 'menus! tremble which the Wooden' had
been pet in, and the cireeessionce of his having chit.
then dependent upon him, the Court felt sad re-
gretted it, end it would perhaps be a steel lesson to
persons in the situating of the Defeedeeti to make
their children a sent, for their pod beheeloar. Biel
Lordship thew observed, that the Court were pardsl
milady iodised to treat the Defeedeat in the most,
lenient manner, Tut it was to his ewe conduct, is
having republished part of the pored?, with the peen
Alert dedication, that he should owe whatever be
shdeld now safer. The recommendation of the Jeep
takes wish she other circumstances which bed bent
urged by the Defendant, had certainly groat weight,
but that was in a great measure lessened bs his sobs
serpent root:set. The libel was a gnu one, sod it
was the duty of the Court to protect the public from
age nets of etch elitist's by peeishing those who
gave them publication. The evidence of tha*Courtll
was, that the Defendant be imprisoned sit months is
the IVprokk gaol, end that at the coil of that time
lie give sect: Sty, Liot.elf in the sum .12001., and ties
others in the sew of Wt. each, that he keep the rade
for three 'ears; and that he he further impinged
wattl sorts secetity wss given.
Mr. WeLeon, who had moved on a former dayl
that the Defendant be brought op to plead to soother
iudictment fora libel, now asked whether the Dolma.
ant should dot be called upon to give bail to that is.
abetment
The Loss Cnics Jnietce said, that the Deralle•
ant might now enter inlet recognisance himself Is
MI., and that it Warwick, where is might be mere
roue:mien, s him, he might at the espiratioe or his
avower, giVlso persons in SOL each to appear to
the issilidgmerif when called upon. His Lordship
added. the{ he could out avoid on ibis ncc.sion
ea-
pressieg his sestet that the Defends n' should have, by
Iris subsequent conduct, obliged Ike Court, be some
degree, to neglect 'the merciful rer °emendation of
she Jot?, which they were most analogs to attend to.
The Defendant, Irooever' had only to blame himself,
'tigerish, as it w.s, the Court had in their smitten,
taken its. reconernmadstion into coosideratioa.
The Clerk oat then about le take she focosoi.i
Lance of the Defendant to appear to the other indict.
rood, and had road in the usual form, " You ac-
knowledge to be indebted—" when,
The Defendsut, interrupting bins ill rather a die.
satisfied tone, said, " l acknowledge monis( : I
am imprisoned for life."
• He was then removed from-Coed la the custody
of the roper officer.
CRIMINAL INFORMATION.
Mr. SCAULLTT moved for a role to show cease
why a (rimiest informatioe shield not be Sled spinet
the Reverend George King. The grouped of this up.
',teeth)" was the allidevit of a Mr. Gardner. The,
allidevit set forth, that the deposed and his wife'
kept a respectable hauding.school in the oeighbour..l
hood of Ashby, in Lincolnshire, close to which the{
Kee. Mr. King had a farm sod some glebe land. The
farm had been let to a teseet' with whom Mr. RIMS
becoming details/ea, wished to lot it to another,
sod mistimed the rircessidance to Mr. Gardner,
with whim he sae at that time ea terms of Islielele
acquaintasce. Mr. Gardner proposed a friend ei
Ms, arid several itatereiews took place on the subject.
Some disagreement however wearied, and the sego.
Mattes was broken of. Soon after this, Mr. King
wrote to Mr. Gardner a very insulting letter, Is
witch be lased him with ssiodlieg, throateelog ho
Sallee sod capon him whesever and wherever they
seet,end used ether larigeage calculated to incite Mr.
Gaidner to a breach of the peen. Urea this the
present applicaries was made.
'lb. Loas Cane Jtiseice said. that Mr. &aloft
bad urged nook\ to iodises the Court to call epee
Mr. Ling for his answer.
Ni. Scum's? remitted, that probably the gnat.
fin tale to show cause might be solidest to as-
seer every purpose.
:Kole to shoo case greeted.
Jest as their Lordships wen @boot to rise, a per.
sots on the door begged that he might be allowed to
stoke a modes. It was, be observed, 'Oast an at-
woo, of that Cosa.
'lke Covet intimated its willingness to hear ii,
and the Applicant was proceeding, when
Ihe Cocas re ques'eal that be might briefly state
the osier* of the motion, is order that they might
hoer • ether it was within their jerisdictiow.
Mr. Pitt (the applicant) then said, it was sit sp.
Vitalises against Robert Bloke, se attorney of the
Court, and would conclude with a motion for a tele
to show cease shy Mr. Make shield not give mes-
sily for the safety of his (the applinot's) person.
The COUNT said, that if son was lb* nature of
stye too; testi', it should be preferred by exhibiting
•ru,ties of shy peace agsiest Mr. liteke, and sake'
Shea *l.4es Le Lad sack aftitles teed).