The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-11-17 00:00:00

r,!%101RZW*.C..7- '

LIIIV INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Nor. 16.

THE ATTJRNEY•GENERAL V. THE COOPER'S COISPANT

- -
AND DR. SZANIS.
(For the circumstances of this case see our paper. of
yesterday.]
Mr. HART repliet.
The LORD CHANCILLOR..--" Let tilis stand over 'for
judgment until Tuesday morning next,' and if the
Coopers' Company have carried in any scheme before
the Master for the regulation of the Charity, let it

be banded to me."
Judgment postponed.
THE SAM v. Till SAME.
Mr. WETHERELL stated this was the petition of Ro-
bert Hudson the elder and the younger, praying that
it might be referred to the Master to inquire and re-
port whether the rent of 4381. paid by the Petitioners
to the Cooper's Company for a firm in the County of
Essex, the property of the Charity, ought not to he
reduced ? There was a long schedule attached to the
petition, spewing that the rent which they paid had
ben over estimated. The land generally produced po-
tatoes and drum head cabbages, which were cultivated
for the London market, and that by the importation
of them from Scotland and other places, the price of
potatots, which three years back were siz pounds
a ton, were now reduced as low as two pounds, and
dram-head cabbars in an equal proportion, by which
means the Petitioners bad lost 1,000/. in the year
1820. For these rations, and the general depressure
of agricultnre, the Petitioners prayed that it might
be referred to the Master to inquire whether the pre-
sent rent paid by them was not too high.
Mr. CHING followed.
r. Mater, counsel for the relators, stated that
there was a vast deal of argument in the petition rela-
tive to potatoes and drum-head cabbages, but the peti-
tioners bad forgot to State to the Court that they had
erjoyed the farm before the year 1818, at 2601. a-vear,
aed it was considered to be so underlet that theCoop-
ers' Company was compelled by the Court to pay the
d;fference to the Charity between that and the greater
rent. The increased rent now paid by the Petition-
ers was their own offer. If the prayer of the Petition
was granted, every farmer who held a lease for twenty
one years might also come to the Court to Ince his
lease cancelled, on account of the present exigency.—
As to an inquiry before the Muter it could be only as
to relief for the present_ exigency, for the Court would
not order the lease to be given up on account of the
reduced price of the drum-head cabbages.
The Lotto CHANCELLOR—." Being unfortunately a
sheep farmer myself, and a sheep may be considered
as' a drum-bead cabbage, am I entitled to relief be-
cause mutton, a little while ago, sold at elevenpence
per pound, and I see it marked up now in Long-acre at
threepence halfpenny per pound ? I never beard of a
farmer wite.lbe articles of produce were at a high
price pay a greater rent to the landoteire_tban he bad
etipelated for in his lease. This Courrt never went
further than to order a reference to the Muter whether
any and what reasonable reduction ought to be made
for the present year. The petitioners may have this
order, they paying the ;costs. I thiak it ought to be
indorsed on the back of the order, that when produce
_shall bear a high price, the petitioners are bound to
refund any reduction in the rent that the Master may
be of opinion ought now to be made to them."

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 16.

TUE RING V. DAVY AND SNOWDEN.
The defendants, whose case we mentioned yesterday,
were brought up again this morning, at ten o'clock,
pursuant to the order of the Court, to receive judg-
ment for wilful and cot rapt perjury, in swearing that
Mr. William Davy, brother of one of the defendants,
was indebted to them in several sums, amounting to
14,0001.
Mr. SCARLETT addressed the Court in behalf of
Mr. Davy, who was placed in the unhappy situation of
ing be obliged to commence a prosecution against his
Own brother. The Court had beard the affidavit of
that gentleman, who would not have come forward but
from a sense of what was due to the public. The
de-
frudants owed Mr. Davy 60001. which he advanced in
brotherly affection, yet from a wicked and abominable
feeling of revenge, they bad endeavoured to throw
him into a prison by swearing to a debt of 14,0001.—
'their object was vengeance, for his integrity in rot
joining them in a design to defraud the rest of the
creditors. The defendants, to the crime of perjury,
added ingratitude towards their formerbenefactor. Mr.
Davy find instructed the Learned Counsel to pray their
Lordships not to confine the defendants together in
the same prison. No reformation could be expected if
they were suffered to remain associates.
Mr. WVLDE also addressed the Court in aggravation.
The defendants being asked if they had any thing
to say, complained that they wanted pecuniary means
to procure affidavits, and applied for further time.
The Loan CHI EP J us rice asked whether they had re-
cently obtained pecuniary means?
Snowden said they bad not, but their intention was
to try their friends or the public at large.
The LORD CIIIEF JCSTIOE---" We cannot give time
for application to the public at large. The utmost the
Court can do is to allow you until Monday sell/might
to procure the affidavits of your friends.
The defendants accepted the indulgence offered, and
are to come up again at the time appointed.
The greater part of the day was occupied in special
arguments.

COURT, Nov. 16.

RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIOUTS.
VIIIIILOW V. TIIIIRLOW.
This suit, at the iastance of Mrs. Maria That-low,
against bop husband. for restitution of. Conjugal
'ights (on oµ plea that be bad, without just cause or
provocatims, compelled her to quit his house in 1816,
under a deed of separation), was met by a responsive
allegation oa thw part of Wm. Thurlowt Esq. charging
&dither, in bar of the wife's suit, and, praying in con-
sequent*, that the Court would prowonsee sentence of
divorce. •
The Wiest question was as to the admissibility of
this allegation. which contained. 17 articles. The
chief of Oise were now objected to by Drs. Phillimore
and Dodson. Counsel fur Mrs.Tiserlow, on the ground,
that they were expressed in a wanner which was too
tscersl, rape, diffuse, and irrelevant. These ohjee-

none were atismeted- Dru Jenner awl Lasinures•
and argued at considerable length. los
Sir C. Row-Mask prof:eaud to gitopdgesellawn
the
several !fillet's is Os their admissibility. It will coin-
petent for the husband to plead the adultery. of his
wife, in bar of her snit against Wale% notonly to
oppose her claim of restitution, bid to avail himself of
a divorce, which the law allowed. Aelseire die adultery
should be proved ; so that, in fact, this became a suitl
of-adultery, by means of thOusband's
With-regard to the husband S pleading- the marriage,
the birth of children, and a deed of separation, by
which, in 1816, he ceased to cohabit with her, as al-
leged, on the ground or unhappy differences between
them ; there was no solid objection to his pleading
those facts, although it was admitted a deed of sepa-
ration was no bar to a suit of restitution of conjugal
rights, unless founded on adultery as the cause of such
separation. Those pleas not being attended with ad-
ditiotail expense or detriment to the female, were yet
material to the history of events, and therefore the
Court would admit them to proof. Likewise as regard-
ing this agreement, by which the husband was to take
the children from their mother's charge, allowing her
eighty pounds per annum, which the allegation further
evened, was regularly paid. To the sth article, Itbeing
objected. that no act of adultery was charged to have
taken place till 1820 ; yet it set forth, that the said
Maria Thurlow resided at Sudbury, in Suffolk. and
Braintree, in Essex, after the separation, such specifi-
cation of residence having no object in this snit. The
Court, however, determined this was a part of the res
fiesta, as connected with the more substantive facts
charged, namely, that the said Maria Thurlow after-
wards resided in the neighbourhood of London and
I Southwark, at Paradise-row, Lambeth, West-lane, Ken-
nington, and other places, whereby she assumed va-
rious names, and became criminally connected in adul-
tery with sundry strange men, whose names Mix com-
plainant cannot set forth ! The Court observed, in an-
iswer to this generalcharge, it was not likely to find
out the names of all, or any of such persons as might
be connected with a woman Using separate from her
husband in a state of public prostitution, as this ar-
ticle set forth ; but being connected with the history
of what took place in that of more substantive charges
of adultery, that article should be admitted, as it
might tend to more satisfactory evidence of specific
facts which might afterwards come before the Court ;
and especially where it was charged in the nature of
confession; though confession of adultery was not
admissible evidence in itself, yet as decided in the case
lof Mortimer v. Mortimer, under the peculiar circum-
stances of the case, it might be evidence connected
with other facts. This allegation in the 6th article
pleaded, that the said Maria Thurlow frequently called
upon a Mr. Parsonson, with whom she had formerly
lodged at Sudbury ; and confessed to him that whilst
she lived at Paradise-row, Lambeth, she was regularly
visited by two young men, who were in business in
Bond-street, on Saturdays and Sundays, and that they
• • *int 'and allowed he.e a weekly support. Thii,
was a coofenion of a- singular nature, wick qr the Conte
felt reluctant to admit, until it should appear nutlet
what circumstances this Lady had made Mr. Parson-
son her confidant, so as to possess him of such a mi-
nute disclosure of her being engaged in an habitual
adulterous intercourse. And with respect to the ob-
jection that both these young men might be in-
ferred as sleeping with her at one and the same
time, the Court thought it more probable that
by Saturday and Sunday night, was meant.
that one passed the Saturday night with her,
and the other the Sunday; although this confession
went on to state that they staid with her till Monday
morning, and then went to their business. The names
of these young men were not introduced, and the
Court was desirous to know how it commenced, and
what gave rise to so singular a conversation between
her and Mr. Parsonson, before it admitted that arti-
cle, especially as it set forth no date or specific act of
adultery ; it might be difficult for the party to make
a defence to such a general charge, specifying no one
particular day, but Sunday's and Saturday's generally,
In consulting books of practice, the Court was parti-
cularly cautious to admit evidence of confession, in
order to guard against collusion ; for purposes of vo-
luntary separation and divorce the Court would at all
events require that article to be reformed. The deci-
sion of Sir W. Scott in the case of Mortimer and Mor-
timer, drew the line of distinction, the evidence in
that case of confession being of a special nature, and
such confession having a connection with substantive
facts proved. The seventh article was more specific,
in charging her -with carrying on. an adulterous con-
section with a Mr. Ferguson, who lodged at the
house of a Mr. Anderson, No. 9, Tower Royal ; that
on the morning of the 14th of September., 1820. she
called there and enquired for Mr. Ferguson, calling
herself by the name of Taylor or Turner, and being
shewn up stairs to the first floor, she breakfasted with
him that day, and remained taking her meals with
him till the next morning. The servant went up
about ten o'clock on the night of the 14th, and found
the-room door fastened, and the key-hole stopped up
with paper. This was the very jet of the husband'a
allegation, and therefore should be admitted. It was
further charged that she lived with the said Fergu-
son in the King's Bench prison, passing as his wife..
by the name of Mrs. Ferguson, and that meeting a
female with whom Ferguson had cohabited, by Red-
dent, on Fish-street-bill, she 4,4, dessed to her that she
was then living with the said Ferguson in the prison.
The COURT admitted the objection as to the infer-1
once, that this confession implied they were living is
adultery, since it was for the Court to draw the is-
•farence from the whole res gesta of this eunfessios.
The iuference could only be admitted by way of inuendo.
IVith respect to the 13th and 14th articles as re-
garded repetition in the summer in which identity was
pleaded, the COURT held that was not a material ob-
jection ; if it shoultlappear there was a sufficient iden-
tification.
The COURT admitted the articles to proof, with ex-
ception of the 6th, aiml some trifling reform being di-
rected in other articles,
Private information being given that an Illicit dis-
tillery was carrying on at No. 6, Oroetrei•hall-court,
Poultry, the .officers of Excise, accompanied by some
officers of the City Police, repaired thither.yesterday
morning, and seised upwards of 6EO gallons of nio-
lasses-wash, and all the Utensils for ekrrying on an
extensive distillety. The parties concerned had pre-
viously made their escape.

I .- ,1
,Ar: • ; 7

POLICE.
Maatatoitoutinexam.—Five persons of %tah • sexes
were apprehended yesterday, bx Plank, Jeffetdez, and
IFalett, and, codcrwent an examination, charged with&
burglary and extensive robbery in the housed/dr. Ord%
a gentleman of fortune, residing in Berkay-square.—'
The burglary and robbery took place on the 10th
Octobei, and 'twos then supposed the thieves had effect
ed an entrance with pick-lock keys, but now the eel.
dente goes to excite a suspicion that they were let in by i
a woman servant, baying charge of the house in the eh-
Bence of the family. The property stolen is to the amount
of several huridired pounds. in costly apparel, linen,'
watches, diamonds, pearls, and other jewellery, together
with glasses and other furniture. Scarcely a portable
article was left in the house. This robbery is coupled
with estrum-slimy circumstances, which cannot at pre-
sent be stated. The prisoners were remanded.
11flb,.r-Lz-nosiz Oevice.—Mr. James Littlewood, of
the Inn of Littlewood and Lewis, linen-drapers, resid-
ing at No. 156, Oxford-street, attended before the Sitting
Magistrate, pursuant to a summons, on an information
under the Metropolis Paving Act, wherein be was
charged with neglecting to remove an obstruction after
notice being given him by the surveyor of the pavements.
Tim nature of the obstructions specified in the informa-
tion was proved by Mr. Smith, also a linen-draper, and
living next door to the defendants, which ogie, that the
said defendants bad for tieing* of time beedin the prac-
tice of exposing shawls, pelisses' and other articles at
their shop-door, whiCh satiltirticles projected on thefoot-
pavement about a foot, and consequently formed an ob.
stroetion within the true intik and meanies of the Act
of Parliament.
Mrf Littlewood contended, that the articles placed at
his door were not an obstruction, and be thought it was
a very hersh proceeding against him, as several of his
neighbours were daily offending in a similar way, and
the ecesplaint was instituted from motives of malice, by
demi th, his neigitle.
strata at the offence had been proved,
TlFOOkeri
and as be had no lit that Mr. Smith, the complain-
ant, would nut area for a conviction, he would give Mr.
Littlewood a week to iJlscontinue the practice, and if he
did not then desist be should enforce the penalty.
INION-liALL.—Thoithes Beesley and Was. Fiddle,
0 brought up for a further examination,on a charge
vr
eMefitefiding Messrs. Specie and Copeland, porcelain
and eass manufacturers, of •property to a large
amount.
Joshua Benyon, a servant to Messrs. Spode and Co.
stated, that on Saturday morning last, he was put into
the possession of the house and stock, at No. 170,
High.street, Borough, and remained there during the
whole of the day. In the evening, Beesley and Fud-
dle, with a Oentlesuan named Cook, came in. and asked
by what authority be was in the house. He informed
them ; when one of the party produced a constable's
staff, and desired the witness to walk out, Beesley
came forward, and said if he did not go, he would
ere him in charge to the watchman, and he in conse-
quence left the premises. On Monday afternooa, be-
tween three and four o'clock, he went again to the
house and found it shut up, bat Mrs. Beesley and her
children were in the upper part of the house. On
, looking over the shop lie missed a dessert service and
/ several other articles, which he believed to be the pro-
lisertylot lireenteinpent. having been in the imbit of re-
ceiving the produce of the sales in the shop weekly.
Cross-examined by Mr. Haasiza—He never saw the
private agreement between the parties. He took what
money was offered to him, not knowing whether it was
right or wrong. Ile knows that all goods delivered
to Beesley were chargeable to his debit.
Examined by Mr. TURTON—Beesley was treated in
all respects as a servant. He never had any conversa-
tion with him on the terms upon which he was put
into the house.
Mr. William Copeland, jun. proved that Ise left a
written notice on the premises, on Saturday morning.
for Reesley to deliver up the stock and preullees.
Cross-examined by Mr. HARMIII—A paper produced,
which was said to be a debtor and creditor account be-
tween Beesley and his employer, was admitted to be in
the band-writing of Mr. Copeland. On it there ap-
peared a deficiency against Beesley of upwards of
seven hundred pounds.
Sutherland, one of the persons set to watch
the premises, saw a man named Hitchcock, and the
other two prisoners, remove several parcels of goods,
between ten and twelve o'clock on Sunday morning.
They were taken to Hitchcock's house, in Mermaid-
court, in the Borough.
James Bland ford, another watch upon the prisoner's
actions, deposed to the same effect; and also that he
stopped Fuddle with one parcel of goods, when he said
he was going to take• them to a Mr. Garrett's, who
bad bought and paid for them.
John Hitchcock, of Mermaid-court, in the Boroughs.
stated that he was introduced to Beesly on the Wed-
nesday preceding last Saturday, and was asked if he
wanted to purchase any earthenware. and, as an in-
ducement for him to become a purchaser, be was told
that be should have what he wanted at the cost price.
He fixed upon a dessert set of china, anti bad paid for
it 21. his. In consequenceof their not being delivered
as soon as ordered, he went to Beesley's house on Sunll
day morning, and assisted him and Fuddle to take
them to his own house.
Cross-ezemined.—He bad fixed upon the things he
wanted before Sunday morning.
Mr. Benyon proved the dessert service to be the pro-
'perty of Spode and Copeland.
Mr. Oarratt proved the value of the service to be
V. 95., and that Beesley was not authorised to sell it
for less.
Mr. Manning, a neighbonrof Beesley's, had seen pars
eels taken to and fro from Beesley's house to the Mar-
shales prison ; and the impression on his mind was.
that some one was coming oat of the prison to lodge at
his house.
, Joseph Rutland. the Deputy Marshal of the prison,
said, that in consequence of instructions be hid re-
ceived from Mr. Garrett, he stopped several parcels' of
goods that came from Beesley's house. Some property
also claimed by Messrs. Spode and Copeland had also
been found in an apartment of one of sh ► prisoners.
Mr. Tuirrom said this was the case against the pri-
soners, but that he should not press for the committal
of Fuddle.
Mr. CHAS/MRS:HIM you any defence to make for
the prisoners ?.
'Mr. HARMEW said that be was convinced that in
Us; Beisky mold not be convicted bat as the
Magistrate 'had taken an impression that a felony
had been cosismitted, he should reserve the *ken for
a future occasion. Pt 1-4,0
Mr. Cuaisuuz?'—l uriloabtedly think there are
.strong eircamstanCes. against ;Boesky. but I. %see
my doubt as to Fuddle. If Fuddle will give secs.

:W..4•••• ,Vf-i"•••••• • 74.!••Urti."•••• • •••

rlty.to as a witness, if he is required,
t.wn arid send the other case to the
dbiesc forthcomingrgs him,
Sessions.
Mr. HARKER wished him to be committed to tale
his trial at the Assizes ; and, addressing himself as
Beesley, recommeded him to prefer being tried before
a Judge in preference to the Sessions. It would, he
said, subject him to a longer imprisonment, bat he
was decidedly of opinion that it would be better for
him to be tried before a Judge.
Beesley assented to the proposal.—He was an
fully committed for trial, and Fuddle was ordered Who
confined until be could find bail.
Usetow-HALL.-1/. J. Crew, a man about 40 year' er
age, residing, in Lock's-fields, Walworth, was app;
bended upon a warrant granted at the instance oft
number of the inhabitants of Walworth, and mould
yesterdayY before the Magistrates, charged with ads of
the most shocking brutality towards his son, a he,
only 7 years of age. Mr. Maynard, a gentleman h,
siding at Walworth, stated the particulars of thcFl,
sonees conduct towards his child. He said that the
risoner had very frequently alarmed the net
Rood by his inhuman treatment of the boy.
saner was in the constant practice when he was
of beating the child with his clenched fists, and lathhai
him about till he could scarcely stand. Ile haileh,.
when the child offended him, thrown him into a was
bath, ana compelled him to stand in his wet clothe,
he was in a shivering fit. The blows given ae the
child, and the child's screams, had been heard alma.
siderable distance from the house. The prisoner lwa
kept the child for a day or two together without UK.
locked him up in a room, and this in the depth et sib,
ter, without fire; but the climax of his brutality wets
chaining up the boy against the wall with a chalk
thick strap, and a padlock, and in such a manner shade
'could scayeely ease himself by changing his pain^
and he was kept in that place for a day together 4.
‘ott food. Somn-of the affighbOUri had thrown foals
him tbron4ll the window. •
A nutnbei of witnesses `came forward and deposed la
the facts above itafest; one of them produced thetheik
strap, and padlock, by which the child 'was fastened w
the wall. Another deposed that on Friday last 140.,
saner beat the child till he could scarcely walk.
The prisoner in his defence said, the child was a led
boy. and had robbed him, and was obliged to chaislin
up, because be was in the habit of running away sea
joining a gang of juvenile thieves.
Several-of the witnesses said, that the prisoner'setete-
inent was a complete falsehood, and merely an Weide
of his to avert punishment.
The prisoner's wife admitted, that her lute&
used the child in the horrid manner above ,
she attributed his conduct to excessive passion sad de
toxieation.
The Magistrate said, he should take the boy eat of
the hands of such an unfeeling wretch, and send hints
the workhouse; but after a consultation with the milli
officers who were present, and did not wish to nuke
boy chargeable upon the parish, the Magistrates gas
up the boy to his mother, and committed the prison
to Horsenionger-latmgaol for want of bail, for his ap-
pearance at theSessione, to answer for theoffenee which
he had committed, and for his keeping the peace tomb
his child. On his way to gaol, such was thefeeliag of
the crowd assembled round the office, that he nartente
escaped personal violence.

LONDON NA lIKSTS, Mr. it,
• -
market has
COTTON.—The been exceedingly
for sonic weeks past, and we have at length to gated
small depression in the prices; Surats of last sit
hu
been disposed of at a decline of Id. per lb. on Wet
India-House sale prices ; Bengali have not bees tralist
any reduction, yet the previous prices could sot.bet-
tained. The accounts from Liverpool this uwiliq
state that market exceedingly heavy, but the prieesegs
not lower.
SUGAR —The demand for Muscovades this enk
has greatly improved; the good and fine Sugars Wit
be stated Is. a 2e. higher; the inferior browns us it
more request, prices a shade higher have been obnisd,
sod there is every prospect of a further improveuest is
Surs. The prices ly h been exceedingly dr
presgased : the stocks onatel handave are inconsiderable. The
Refiners have evinced some anxiety to effect sales pre
vious to the winter setting iv a lower prices have is toe
sequence been.submitted to : the shipping houses bate
purchased considerably at the very reduced rate'. i
considerable parcel of Crushed Sugar has been repuild
to be contracted for spring delivery at prices higistikia
the present market rates. The Refiners do rot ger
inclined to enter into these contracts, owing to tore
sent very low prices of the market. The public WI
Havanna'', 179 boxes, went at prices Is. 21.101114
yellow 255. 6d. a 28s. 6d.; 126 chests Brazil midge
low rates, rev and ordinary white 28s. a 301. lifilotrim
COFFEB.—The public sales of Coffee beeigbilit'
ward this week have been inconsiderable; des
have been fully maintained : at the public sale Mewl.
fair quality St. Domingo in casks sold at lOUs.
and 1111 s. very. ordinary 985.; good io fine emir
Jamaica extensively 102 s. 6d. and 'Ms.
FRUIT.—The arrivals of every description this wei.
has been considerable; new Currants and Tarkey
arc expected to begin landing in a day or two; too
very large public sales have been broughaorwardi col"
slating of new Spanish Figs, Prunes, Free
and Muscatel's Bunch (the fin?st cargo that
lolrr
,lea
seen at market this season, and sold briskly" at
prices): yesterday three cargoes of new MOW°
Valentia Raisins, quality tine, consisting of 111110%
about one-third appeared to have sold at
boxes and.looo half-boxes, about half sold
625. a 655. per cwt.
The sat
RUM, BRANDY, end HOLLANDS7,_,.6---
for Rum by private contract has been conziooraw"..„.
market may be stated firm, and prices, aissr,
The reduction in the rate of rent at .tibe 1111"'
warehouses appears to give great firmness le&
and will probably induce speculators to putclitill The
as they can vow hold them at a reduced expense'
pnblic sale this forenoon consisted of 141 tbe
Jamaica Rum, of au uncommon good V`"°
ear Oat'
strength quite unprecedented; one lot, 45 1:* sei
over proofs sold at 3s. ; average 45 pocyees
generally strong Rums are higher. Brandies hypo
in more request, the prices are Id. a d. P r
higher--llt Geneva there is no alteration.
TOISAta .s'.. 1--.. ..,.i for Tobacco

E
I
•
14
he
, I
he

bigher•lP ealineY4 lIIVI-13 as ...• ... . ...._
Towicco.—The demand for Tobacco Cou"'7-6
general avid e*tensive ; the purchases are at 00
shade higher than the bite advance of Id. per 1b....... 71a.
TALL OW.—The Tallow market is exceediegi/00
and purchases have been made 6il. below NO
quotations. The town market is the sass as Itairk
465. 6d. , __----------"....
...,
MARRIED. 111001.
On Tuesday lest. et St. A lhaft'6. WW"1.114 40 el
Edward O. A. Beckwith. to Elizabeth Jose,. 0•11
J. Hanbury, Esq. of Laytomtene, Esses. '
0 ;
• DIED. • .
EdAwteardrigh6:44l'ewolool. ofWßetodelllrwdertYC(nimagateto.e.tfreti*
r..
On Thursday last, Mr. V. Sells, of Esolside,
aged 14. - ,
London : /Allied, ['tidied, au') • Wished 11 tt i
" Till STAITIONAP:" and .', lipetiozorrrultlerwo,
• Paper). No. 194. Strand, 6W:orate-St. CleclevisOi,
by It -No.
LL.B.. to %Isom
addrosir ell
Orders, &c. are requested to be
• .
.... _ .....,,,,,,,,..... .-... ....-----...:•••:-A-- •-•'-
. -.— ,