The Statesman.
London, England, 1822-03-11 00:00:00

Nes* YaniskiL:viee

Governor of

• " •altaacPTs. •
D. 0. Stevens. Harlow, Essex. linen-draper, to surrender
Mareli It, ta. April 2U, at Basinghall.street. Attorney, Mr.
Ream, Hatasolarden.
P. R. Levietllleth-pitee, New-road. Middlesex, trimming-
manniaetttrer. March It 23. April 20, at Hastughall-street.
Attorney, Mr. Willey, Essex-Street, Strand.

J. Savage, Broadway, Worcester, plc-defier, April I. 2.
ID, at the White Hart Inn, B roadway, Woreeder. Attorneys.
Messrs. Taylor and hlowld : and Mr. Grin* Chipping.'
Essapdea.
B. Porter, Chorlton7row, Maniester. cotton-spinner,
March *2, IS, April 20. at the Bridgewater Arras Inn, Man-
chester. Attorneys, Mr. Edge, Manchester; and Messrs.
Milan and Parry, Teeple.

J. Parsons, Swaffhant, Norfolk, linen-draper, March O.
di, April VO, at the Norfolk Hotel. Attorneys, Mr. King,
Serjeant's-latl, Fleet-street; and Mr. Millard, Norwich.

J. Alai'''. Hainstall-Ridirare. Stafford, eern-dealer.
March 19, 20, April 20. at the Wolsely Arms Inn. Wolsely-
bridge. Attorneys, Nfeaars. Randall. Clement's-inn ; and
Mr. Koblesoe, Lichfield.

Attorneys,

P. H. Byrne, Bucklersbary,
March 11. April 3. YU. at H--
Messrs. Freeman ao4 Heatlmola, CI
P. H. Lea, Prior.placr, Hut-lane, Walworth. tea-dealer.
March 13.33, AOII 30, at Rasinghall-street. A. army, Mr.
Taylor, Farcical's-Inn, Holborn.

W. T. Sherwin, Paternoster-row, bookseller. March 12,
0, April O. at Basingltsll-street. Attorneys, Mews. Til-
wl Preston, Coleman-street.

W. Scandrett, Worcester, glover, March 21, 22, April2o,
at The llop-Market Inn. Attorneys, Messrs. Collett, Wha-
bens and Collett, Chancery-lane.
J. Woolcock, Truro, Cornwall, draper. March 18. 13.
April itt, at Basinghall-street. Attorneys, Mr. Gates, Cates-
tor-street.

DIVIDENDS.

April 1, J., .1. F., and R. Seaton, Pontefract, hoaxers—
April 6, W. Stanliorth. Little Easteheap, wine-merchant—
Mardi 80, N. Corti. (}olden-square, dealer la music —March
90, J. Cattleman, Water-street, St. Clement's-Danes. carpen-
ter—April 90, R. G. Beesley, Austinfriars. merchant—
Mardi 30, A. (hart, Broad-street-place, merchant—March
30, J. Gorton. Henry-street,ilampstead-road, smith—March
19. J. Rice, New hhorehata, merchant—April 9, J. Dalton,
Bury St. Edmund's, surgeon—March 30, T. Sargent, Mill-
bank-row. Westminster, stone-merchant—March 30, W.
Baker, Lloyd's entree-house, insurance-broker—March le.
G. Richardson. itleckleoloarg-square. and T. Wakes. Maces-
ter-street, Queen-square. merchants—hien:ls 11, G. and J.
Woolrleh, tipital-square. silk-manataeterers--Alarch 30. H.
Neykr, Bristol, dealer— t pril Y, F. Everett, Woolle), Wilt-
shire, clothier.

ceßTiricAres.—m•neu 30.

J. Pealey. jun.. they, Glocestershire. dyer—S. Aydon
sad W. Elwell. Halifax, iron-masters—J. Hodgson, !Rain-
drop. Durham. shopkeeper—W. Oxford-street, tai-
lor—J. Carruthers, Bristol, precer—T. Potter, Mcnebe►ter,
Macintyre, Liverpool, merchant.

•Pa MTN aaatllPl DISIOLVI(1).
J. and P. Nichol. and W. Alexander, provision-merchants
—J.•and P. Nichol; ship-brokers—S. kltrsh anti S. R.
Brooks, '{Manchester, merchants—T. and C. liabrisi. Ban-
ner-r‘trort, Whitecrosi-street, St. Luke's. limber-inert:hoots
—J. Ckatterton, J. Chadwick. (I. Hendee, and J. Ward,
tirielgehirithin-Royton. LanearliiriP. coal-merchants-11.
and J. Rhodes, I.lltle Oonarmal. Yorkshire, woolieu-eluth-
annlierensies—T. and .I.* Viner. Ilaigeriurd. Berkshire,
wine-wnesbants —W. Daniel and T. Cats, liaarer.borough,"
dealer, hi porter —J. and J. Cox, Barbican.
and W. Fisher, Bath, theri—R. Ketsall, J. Pdwardson, J.
Neva., J. Jantesnn, and T. toluell, Liverpool. traders—T.
Johnens and J. Nfoure, Lancaster. attornies —S. an rkrr and'
PhilpeN-11110„ iron mer.•hanto S. •Id • , U.
B .rluw, and J. Tkosuptoo, Clovis. a, tteelrusanut.ct.n

of a siLliiary manwithost bird or areeration ; beessise
why should an Auer. when accused before a court-
'martial, have had the right, under the admirahto
sanction of the late King, to imolai that the minutest
forms of English trials by the common law should be
observed for tke iongoetion of his commission ■ant! his
reputation, if the ministers of the crown can be jus-
tifiable is removing the most distinguished person •
from his rank and station in the many, whiten&
signing may cause whatsoever.
It appears, besides, to me. that this subject digs
most important for the consideration of parliament,
patting persoaal justice to Sir Hobert Wilson entirely
out of the question, slime such a prerogative, if ladies
crissaioately exercised, without justification or even
explanation, by the ministers of the crown, though Me
persons 'dismissed may be Members of Parliame,,t,
would require that officers of the army should be ex-
elided altogether (too, the House of Commons ; as
falling, is that Me, and IN 711117 case ON LT, directly
and outaifistly within all the principhawhich par-
liament has so repeatedly acted upon in the various'
disqualifi• ohms by statute, of persons holdiag offices
DURING 711 Z P1.1151'111 OF Till CIO% N.

1 am well aware that soy notions of mine open this
subject can be of no kind of value; bat haring Ivrea
accidentally mentionrti in the House of COMMONS, "os
en authority vehicle you would Ge likely to r,spect." I
was anxious to assure sun, that if I had cdotinued to
be i member of that assembly, 1 would have admitted
the King's prerogative, but should hive required suf-
ficient es iderce s support a most extraordinary, sod,
till satisfactorily explained, a most arbitrary exercise
of a power so subject to abuse, and so intolerably dan-
gerous when abused.
1 consider the act in question as a internee of the
cabinet cody. 1 by no means desire to irepficete the
coesniander-in-chief, whose meritaduring moat .didicait
times entitle him to the affection of the armband the
grateful geknowled‘ments of his country. Hts Royal
Highness wis the ojkial organ of rotumenicagion, stud
I have, therefore, uo more right to infer moil hn. 'per-
sonal opinion TH•N THAT Or 'rig KING MING/ILL
Yours moat faithfully,____:

ERSIINE.

Febraary.
To J. O. Lashio°, Esq., M.P.
In ilre Letter from Sir' Robert Wilson to Lord El-
skier, the gallant Knight contesde (and supyrts his
opinion by proofs) that the King has not a prerogai-
thw right to the sole supremo madivida (lowermost of
tilt army; that he was deprived of his sussolate power
weer the array by the Act I Wm. and Mary, cap. 4,
whirls regulated the extent of that power, and which
has been repeated in all subsequent Mutiny Acts.
•• The Mislay Bill," Gals Sir iitibt.rt, **ought to he
regarded as At Charter of the army. it poitits out
eertai• °fences, prescribes certain punivitioraht.
.1,11
Delegates to the King tbe poaer of framing other •r-
-tides of war, and intlictibg puui.hoieots through tie
~diem trod la:erects:ice of a Court' Maria', and oat
otherwise."
I is answer to those who contend that y paler is
Crowe to Mitosis officers at ifs will and plea'sure tour!
he Tested in it to secant. discipline; Sitllt..bereoberiVes
—" Let those who are iodised to mailit,io this a•,
trite, why think title a ease in tiuveru.hent, where i