The Statesman.
London, England, 1810-12-29 00:00:00

'

. ,

THE STA'
,

Of putting the question on's auction so amended,
when the Noble Earl, in'the exercise of his critical
powers, rather excited the risibility of their Lord-
shioc ; and the Noble Baron again stated his prin-
cipal object in the. coning forward was, with
the view of recording his sentiments uu the Jour.
ioala,

The question was then pet, and the Amend..
anent WA* negatived without a division. The origi.
nal Resolution was carried ; and the vote of their
Lordships, adopting' the three Resolutions, was
ordered to be communicated to the Commons, iu
the usual anode of conference.

Thu flow adjourned till Monday, wliets it is ex.
pected the conference will take place.

HOUSE tta.• COMMONS, DEcusitit IS. .

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
stated, that exit appeared to him to be unnecessary.
for the House to meet to-morrow, the Report of
the Upper House not being made, and soffit:legit op-
portunity existing for a conference with their Lord.
ships before the commencement of business tut Mon-
day, he would move the adjournment of the House
to Monday next.
TIEIIVEY wished to know whether die
• Resolutions which it was tuteno...l to propose were
to be in strict conformity of those of 1783.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHKQUEIt
replied, that in substance the Resolutions which he
should submit to the House would, resemble those of
•1788. There would be a difference with respect to
the limitation of the xestrictions, and the manage-
vaunt of the King's person. *He had already de.
dared his intention of proposing that the restric-
tiOns should be limited to a twelvemonth, providing
that the limitation should not expire. until
meat had been sitting six weeks. This precise pe-
riod would not be stated in the Resolutions, which
would contain rutty a declaration in general terms,
that the restrictions should be limited in time, leay.
iug the exact termination of them to be regulated
by the sub:,eglient Bill. He had nearly omitted to
add, that it was intended to propose an exception
frum the restriction oo granting Peerages, as far as
regarded any Naval ur Military Officer, who by his'
achievements might.betionie entitled to the hunour.
able distinction of a seat in the Upper House of Par..!
liament.

Mr. ADAM as,ked if the regulations respecting
his Majesty's household were to be the same As tiltObe
io 17S8.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER.
answered in the affirmative ; with the exception of
the introduction into the Resulutiou on that subject
of a limitation of the restriction.
Adjourned to Monday.

, LIST"OF THE •.11ISORITY
IN THE HOUSE OF PEERS ON THURSDAY NIGHT.

DUKES. Ilchester King
York Dotiouglimore II titcltin,on
Clare:lee Esser (.‘‘ ydir
Cumberland Albemarle Stowell
Si43,C ,C Roslyn P .teoni!ly (E. of Bee-
Cambridge Coventry bor allot) -
tiloure der Loran CIV:,no (li. I).treley)
Norfitl4. E. M. Chartroom( Dutton 01. of Lluug-
Sitalt.r.rt (:oolotoistleley lo,)
Bedford Si-artitirougo Sa% and S:..tie
scaIIQUISSCS. Coo/ per Upper 0.40ry
iVinehester Peterborough Mendip (V. Clifden)
Lawilowu Wald”;rave . Grantley
Stittford vim:Amnion. K•lth
111-nford ficrefiwt • Da wnsy (V. Dotene)
Heat fort llam ptleo St: Juan
EA a Li. Lskei Ponsonny of lanokilly
Stanhope ISIRON3. Butler ( I:. of Orotund)
Spencer Holland Carysfort
Curlete • Boyle (E. of Cork) Granard .
Ahergavenny Lauderdole Hooke
St. Vincent I lao ingi (E. Mira) Foley
• Suffolk Lilfard Alvattley
Jersey A ilsa ( h:. of Cassillis)rburlow
Ttionet Dundus Sea forth
Fitzir illinm Erskine !feat Wield
Tnokerville Yurtotrongh