The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-05-31 00:00:00

Pr::

admitted by the Pro-
)pted to innovate upon
_ Equity, and many of
consequence overturned. The
' ♦iew was of great im-
roperly be discussed when
• Gentleman had moved
the Lillie, but he was
• several months before
could be obtained. The
treed Lord at the bead of
• was undisputed ; and
case, he (the Attor-
Amendment.
that the adoption of the
Ipon the Lord Chancellor.
d the fact that the talent,'
Noble Person had been
justice, was the strong-
motion. Even a legacy
the Court of Chancery
001. The House was net
merely to pledge itself
reason for opposing the mo-
was imputed to any iodi-

,posed the motion. It
Atical from the judicial
.llor ; a proposition too
resent advanced stage of

spoke in favour of the ma-
'rear of business would be
lu.try and ability of the
.his circumstance satis•
was something wrong in
nce of the subject was ad-
no sense be understood

ted. He was no suitor of
'te knew the Court too
)uld lose any sum of
He admitted that the
subdued, but that of Ap-
increasell, notwithstand•
linty of the Lord Chat:-
:etors was not only that
it was also that justice
he would put it to any
!rn of the Court of Chao•
.y ; a system destructive
, of the comfott awl peace
teed the situation of a msitor
grievous and cruel, and
e sense of the House upon

.red to withdraw, and the
dual blution, when there

Againbt it, 36 ;—Majo-

(o the Gallery, we found
er addressing the Howe
Lori Registrar of Scot•
,n of %%Web hail been re-
of the House. The office
lid (as we understood the
would be performed with-
!Tit by the person holding
,gnet ; and upon the death
offices would be abolished alto-
west, added, that while upon
Mention of the House to
Some improvements had
Hon. Gentlemen, which
vailable, and therefore it
ill in its present shape, as a
year only.
ht up certain papers rela-

Ted to know whether it was
tion of the Timber Duties

he was not aware of any

said, lie should feel it Lb
if the House to the subject

to know whether the Right
)pposite intended to propose
respecting Extents in Aid.
if the EXCHEQUER said,
)rmerly complained of had
removed, he had not any in-
(eration of the present Law.

,ARY PRIVILEGE.
rose to submit to the House a
'licit was, to indemnify the
Member for Beverley in the
occasioned to them by an
ippon of its p-rivileges. The
lac Mr. Burton was confined
the time of bis election, and
set at liberty, in consequence
letter to the Speaker. The
action against the Warden of
and that act was declared by
breach of privilege; but the
from attending at the Bar of
their conduct, on condition of
Now as the law at present
was released from a debt by a
there was an end to the debt.
Act of James I. which arose
'. Shirley, who was taken in
taken his seat in that House.
r to the creditor to sue out
a certain time after the privi-
ceased, but the construction of
to persons who were taken in
,lection, and not to those who were
It the time of their election. The
to these creditors of Mr. Burton

hole expenses which they bad in-
tmated at 20001. more. Under all the
id move that the House resolve
of the whole House to consider
Majesty for the purpose of granting
those persons by way of compen-
This he considered a mere act
ividuals. but his object went still
hereafter to submit a substantive
for the purpose of rendering
a seat in that Meuse who were

• , .
• .
~
1mmujr.............
Lad been alluded to, but it was at
t fusion that Lord i'llansfield attemi
.4he jurisdiction of the Courts of
1 his decisions were in consequent
present motion in every point ofl
I portahce, and might very proper
the information which the Hon. I
for should have been laid upon
quite satisfied sbat it would be s
t that voluminous information con
anxiety of the Noble and Learne
the Court to do justice to all t
under all the circumstances of ti
nev.General) should support the
*Mr. LOCKHART denied tha
motion would imply a censure ripe
The fault was in the system, andi
burning, and integrity of that N
found ineffectual to edministerjt
est argument in favour of the me
of 901. could not be recovered in
without risking the loss of 100/.
called upon to do any act, but a
to inquiry, and be saw no reasol
lion, especially as no blame wa,
trickish
Mr. Serjeant ONSLOW opp
proposed to separate the polit
character of the Lord Chancelk
grate to be discussed in the pre
the Session.
Mr. WILLIAM SMITH spol
lion. It appeared that the arrei
greater were it not for the lode
present Lord Chancellor, and ti
tied him (Mr. S.) that there wa
the system. The importance
witted, and the motion could in
at a censure.
Mr. M. A. TAYLOR replied
the Court of Chancery, for be
nell—(A laugh)—and be wot
/ i
4 Money rather than enter it.
number of causes had been sis
t peals had very considerably it
ing the admitted labour and ab
ceilor. The maxim of our and
itts,ice shoald not be sold, it
~I,onld not be delayed ; and It
candid 6.111 whether the sport]
ecru did not demand imittiry
not only of the property, hut n
ril tnind of the subject. Indeed
in the Court of Chancery was'
he was tlcterinked to take the
hi. motion.
1 Strangers were then orders
House divided upon the origi
appeared
For the Motion, 52;—A
r;ty, 4.
I pon our re-admission into
tl.e Marquess of LONDONDLR)
1 it 16 reference to the office of
i 1..i.d, an of the abolition
t atomended by a Committee o
Lad now become vacant, any
i ;s Noble Martprnis) its duties w
oil any increase of emolumen
'.• i
t the office of Keeper of the Sig
t if t'sat person the two offices
lit, , g, ther. The Noble Marques
I Li. legs he would call the at,
' 5
ti:e Poiice Regulation Bill.
lic.sir suggested by several
might hereafter be made ava
was proposed to pass the Bil
. . .
, . temporary measure for one y
1
• Mr. UOULBURN brough
. cli
live to the Colonies.
Mr. J. P. GRANT wisher
t Lt ii,trittleti to bring the questi
i • . ! b. fore P.trllament next Stasi
Mr. ROBINSON said,
; il
5r....11 intention.
.1 , 11 Mr. J. P. GRANT then
, . it
attentionsio
n.
of
. ':::rt;:n to
call thefutitreo
occasion.
1 1
t Mr. W. SMITH %%Ward t
Honourable Gentleman al
;thy alteration of the Law ri
Th., (I.I.INCF,LIOR of
11 , •- that as the grievances for
• ' ,' . been in a great measure ret
1 ' . teution to propose an altera
• I, 1 " :: PARLIAMENTA
Mr. S. WORTLEY row
mustier, the object of whi
I crelli•prs of Mr. Burton, 1
Itst Patliament, for loss t
order of that House in sal
Home %could recollect that
- ' I ,% 1,•, in the Fleet for debt at t
1 4. :i
..! I
li :4,h
Tr ac tda
niht
,e,
aro!, -
pacs shortlyloi
commenced
a,t,,ieonnce
die, fytaenri
:2
the Fleet for an escape, a
the House to be a high I
creditors were excused ft
I" the Rouse to answer for t
k i withdrawing the suit. I
i
, .
stood, when a party was
competent authcrity, the
• # Ile had looked into the I
out of the case of Sir J.
t execution, after he had
That Act gave a power
execution again within a
lege of the debtor had c
lithe Act applied only it
execution after theirelec
1 , 1
It. ( actually in execution at
amount of the debt due I
was 1000/. and the why
carved might be tettimate
11 1 circumstances, be shoal
itself into a Committee
an Address to his Maje,
a sum of money to the
i sation for their tom. '
of justice to the indivi,
further, for be wished 1
motion to the House
persons ineligible to a
1
_
11.