The Statesman.
London, England, 1820-10-12 00:00:00

THE STATESMAN.

visCe yon
easp4preiindktiffehiltefandisatietbeeng: • •
The ATTOR,lsvAisitlytm. *tinted 4 this qtiesfiPa,
but 'afterwards waived the objvetiotr.
Ifas any tifsplittatiotf 'barn made tb Yon by his Ma-
jtsiy's Uorrrtnnifit sineo'Yoisr irris'al?-4 seas ordered
to attend at the .Idniiralty, to gine evidence respectink
James. • •
Loan I'll tmert.Loa.-ris that the English sailor yon
speak of !--Ves. 3lv bora. •

kt;suination by the Pcitus.
Lord Rosrwritkv.?—louirtve stated, that you saw the
Princess at tiernaV-Yes.

Did you cer Wei-curd at loyal:lA.4 there?--\o.
lie iras in nttend.inee there, lie was not sitting down?
---('rrtaiuls• not.
Turn your attention'to the journey to Jerusalem, and
say if von can rei'Ale..t whether the tent was doub:e or
single:—There n an outer and an inner tents the.
smaller tent was within the larger and had a jgallery
rotted it.
Did you ever see any persons lie down in that gallery?:
—ll.neter saw any one lie down there, but there was a
mattress in theiallerv. and 1 have seen servants near it
I peter saw it at the 'time ashen persons might be es-
petted to lie doirn.
In point of fret awl you do not know whether any
boat slept there or not do not.
I \.sble lard then referred him to the tent on
board the polarre,
Tell me whether, from' the •raastrue•tion of the tent,
any person might open it after it was closed at night?—
Certainly kt was tasy to• sly so by polling the two parts
aside.. .

Do you know whether it was fastened on the inside at
the part% where it timid be separated f—No, it was pet.
Von have stated, that von went up the ladder on PPR
occasion neer her Royal.Highoess had retired. did her
Royal' flikleniss...sprak to roe; did she any thing on
your going up !—No. I Jiwoverett my mistake only
lir finding that. the tent was closed. I knew from that
that her Royal Highness had retired, and l went down
immediately.

Yon have slated. I believe, that this was after the light
was put out?_.Yes, the light was out then.
Your only knonleJge then that the Princess had re-
tirrd was &rived frout.the fact of the tent being closed
—Yes.

You hare lo.en :rhea about the journey of het
Royal Ilightiesi from Milan to home by Ancona, and
afterwards from Rome to Senegaglia. 1 now wish to
know front you how iseanyearriages her Royal fligh-
tless hal on that jonrney .do not recollect -the
number positively ; three or four I think.
Of what s?rt were thew?—There was an EngllA
landau, an linoi,ll land:mit% a German calash; be-
longiotr to 31r. William, and another calash made at
!Lome.

Where did yott stop the first day on the jottrney
from Rome to Senegaglia ? Did you not stay•at-lior-
tiroli —No, that was on the ?econd day.
Did you travel by nit ht or by day ditrihr that
journey :---We:tratelleil by night, and stopped
ilur-
iug the day-lime.
Did you not stop also at Lorliero 7-1 think we
did : I recollect we did, becanse there are {ODIC mi-
neral springs thee,.
Did yon Hot stay the 3d day at Charno ?—I think
we breahfrard there. . .
How lour Jid yon stay there ?—We stayed an hour
or two, to the best of may recollection, but I cannot
say how Itmc.
How fit is Chajmo from Sessegaglia ?—One or two
posts; about lett '""" •
At what time did yes got to ilearogaglia ?—About
one or two o'clock iu`the day.
Wal it rot later ?—I cannot recollect the time pre-
cisely it may have been later.
Was it nor as late as 5 o'clock ?—I do not recol-
lect : but I think that it was not.

Canow. you ‘ay whether it was 2 o'clock or 5 ?—I
cannot.

Will you swear positively that it was not so late as
3?-1 will not undertake to say any thing positively
about it—the circumstance is not marked in my me-
nsory. •
Do you mulled whether you saw Sitechi. whilst
von were at Charno-:-1 do not recollect that 1 did
;see hint.

Nur whether &lead Wag ill there or not for a short
tine ?---No.

Did not you are him in bed there in convequenceof
an illness whirls he bid from taking something cola;
snore iced lemonatie, or something else ?—1 hare. to.,
Cie siightest revolleetton of any inch circutnstanee.
lb yon know in what carriage her Royal Hittbesse
travelled in her journey to Senegaglia ?—1 think
it was in the English lantlattlet : I am not certain.thit'
it Iris in the landsulet ; but she almost always-
fed in that carriage. .
Was it not at that this* very hot weather
was the month of August.

And von travelled in the night to avoid the Met of
the day ?—Exactly so.
Who travelled with her floral Highainis hallos tar.
ria4e ?--I ratlivr think the Countess Oldi sad Roe-,
g a In
Who travelled with you?---As fur as I cal uceniect4 •
the two thatithetutaids and Count Schiavani
•
to Rome it wee mg a&
IVher,• did the little Victorine travel?--With
Royal flightless. •
Did she travel the whole way with her Royal Mg
111.553.?--- Yes. I recollect a circumstance that has low,
pre, %NI that fact in my memory. The child would burl
tr.tv..l in our carriage, because in our journey through
the 'fyrol she had been upset in it, near Insprock, --
Notwithstanding that circumstance, will you swear.
that the child was never occasibnally iniour carriage ?-
tlou't recollect ever having seen her in it.
Who travelled in the third carriage ?—Austli sad'
Captain ‘'assali.
What sort of a carriage was it?--A• German arrive
belonging to Mr. William.
Witz.t carriage were you ha'—Toe English lauds.. I'
think.
I have been talking to you of the Jennie/ treat Is ,
to Senegaglia. lam sow going to talk of the joatisog'
to Item. At Alison* did you sae Logi. Rergiuoi?..wi
Yes.
Did Louis BergFai go with her Royal Highness from
Ancona to Rinse r—l am not quite swain whethet he
did or not.
Did you see him there I—Tea: Re time beck Roil
Rome to Atacama.
Anti met yea at Ancona ?—atad set us at Atm
Did he not go along with Isse.Rpgal 'fighting ant
relte to Rome I—That I do net recollect.
Volt are quite ears that you tam iika' 4.1041414
feel persuaded that I tlid. •
• ticr t
Wet then
.0 a (earth carriage hi 041
r. • 7.9.1 4 • •
.111,04 P • der 1

.. ...

travelled in the &melt carriage along "Witli a Roman
Captain of the obit of Laura.
You lean to Rome i--Yes.
!)?'riot Cam era and Louis Bergami go in that
fourth carriage from Route to Senegaglia ?----I do not
recoiled.
Did not Camera and Louis Berfami go from Rome
to Senegaglia as part of your company ?--Positively I
do not know. Louis Berganti went from Rome to
,Milan once or twice.

Who went as courier from Rome to S.negaglia ?----
1 rather think Carlo and Sacchi ; they were the eou-
riers to Rome.

Can yo►► swear that you saw Carlo Forti on the
road from Rome to Senegaglia ?--I cannot positively
swear that I saw either one or the other of them ;
there was no marked circumstance occurred during the
the journey to impress their presence on my Memory ;
nothing that makes ma recollect whether 1 ever spke
to either the our or the other of them.
Uu yiiu eeniemher your having, on the journey from
Rome to .tienegaglia, any difficulty at Pulignia on the
at.ge after about procuring post-horses??---1 do not.
Do you not recollect that you were obliged to take
the saute post-horses on the next stage —That cir-
cumstance happened so often, th.tt l du nut particularly
recollect it at that time.

Can.you,point out any &nee on that journey sites
it happened ?—.No, I cannuot ; I tura,' to say, that is
the coarse of our travels it often happened.
lin your journey to Rome
Yon say that you do nut rem...lll4er seeing Carlo
apes that journey I did you see Sarebil.—My memo-
ry is mot marked with time presence of either one ur the
other.

Will you swear that Sacclei did not ride by the side
of her Hoye! Highness's carriage upon that journey
—Not leaving seen it. 1 canny.: swear.
How far was the carriage in which you travelled dis-
tant from that of her Royal Highness`.?—The distance
varies! ; sometimes it was more, and sometimes it wasiless.
Will you swear that von did not see Sacchi on the
journey from Rome,to Senegaglia ?-1 cannot swear to
a thing which I d.. not recollect.
Ho you know whether there were any other persons
in the tent lint !termed and the Princess dewing the
+age t--1 do not know lent from hearing that others
did sleep there. I never was myself in the tent, nor
never saw the Princess there.

By the Earl of Ito.isasnitt.---Can y4m not recol-
lect whether either of the Couriers, suit utak+ of them
lent before her Royal fliglinest on the j•ourney from
Rome to Senegsglia cannot br po,itive, but I think
it war so,.anorspeakitis• from recollection, I should say
ij.wa% Sacchini.

By EARL 4;firy.—When von said you thonzlit it
wa•
the tent, did yon mean some male ?----Ycs.
, • When von believed it was BErgatni that slept under
the tent, slid it lead your mind to a suspicion of any
impropriety between her Royal Highness and him?--
Ku.

Where did Captain Flynn sleep on board the pula-
ere ?—I believe, in hi% cabin.

By LORD Ltvgaitioi.. liar he never slept upon
?-1 believe he has occasionally, fur 1 have seen
his cot slung upon clerk.
Do you know whether the Barons beloop to Her-

...sus st—iash,
Has he ever been in possession of it ?----I believe he
has.
Was not the name of it chanzed from its former name to
that of the % ilia Item-alai F—Yes : I think It was.
Ily the Mirquis of Liosslll3lA N.—When ))nn say that Her-
ulna has been arm ircartis ss ith her Royal Highness on board
the politer,, do you mein that he was leaning o' her arm /
).es.
Dos she ever leaned on yonr arm in the •a-ne minter /
Pesti* she has; but I am not certain as to the plane.
I,ller Rayal Highness has very fre4uently It al:trd arm in aria
with me.
Daring the period that you were in Italy. base you ever
Mee at her Roy al iligline-s•s house any performance in whieh
1111Wiequin and Columbine neer represented as they are in
this country I— ill that I ever saw, was 1.01114 Bergsma I.
the dress of Harlequin. and that more than once.
By another Porn.—When Cergami was under the tent
with the Princess, have you any reason to believe that *-
Udell person was there also .?-1 do not know.
•,:You swear that yon meter saw /Irritant i kiss her Riyal
Highness !,--1 do certainly.
• • You said you considered there was a necessity for some
ode bleeping under the the tent ; has it occurred to pu what
yds the neeessity /—I never remembered it. but I certainty
think that a woman alone, 'upon a deck of • ship at night,
and out at sea. would require some one to be near her.
Windd not that necessity be met by some one sleeping in
a gist sear her, rather than under the same tent with her t—lt
Sever suggested itself to me in that way before ; but her
Majtaly's suite was not numerous. The duty could only
fail on Lieut. Flynn and me, for Count Schiavini, who had
never been in a ship before, could not be expected to keep
watch.
ay' the End of WIIST MOM LAND. —DO you think that the
neensaity you have mentioned could he met only by a man's
helix( near her Royal. highness I—l do not know as to that.
Dp you conceive that there is no impropriety in the cir-
hsenatanee of a woman bring tinder a tent alone with a man
Ali night ?—There nits no mystery or concealment in it; I
ell of say Mat I conceive it to be an impropriety.
• ThoNoble.Lard then put several other questions of an
twipmentstive nature, tending to ascertain inure strenuously
tiasigrhaess'stopinion. as to the propriety or impropriety of
'•mi sksejlngunder the tent. Tne Noble Lord then pro-
..-
• ' aria slit-fied man, Rlr ?—Ves. _ _

• ki(en allow we to n•lt you, without meaning the
••lelst-stlfence to von, whether you would think it isn-
2'in Mrs. ilownam to sleep in the company of
r man, all night under a lent, and alone with
_thni:man 2--1 cane it answer the question in those
-te4ga. 1 hap,. ms married man ever makes a compari-
son with his wife; and I have never made any cow-
Varian wi'ysvlf.
Loki Limentcs put some questions which were *b-
leatd to be Lord Liverpool and other Noble Lords as
well as 11:41r. Brougham, and eventually struck out.
Irks:witness has said that he recollects the dressof
Herglmi as Harlequin, but that he cannot recol-
lect the dross of thePrintess of Wales. Now did Lonis
Reezensi as4l lite Princess of Wales dance together ?--
I have nen Louis Hergami frequently dressed as
Harlequin. We all tlaree.i together.
y,ou cannot rceellect bow the Princess was dressed. ens
you tell.whodia-PloY Columbine ?--I do not recollect. If I did
ranotlect that iks Princess played Colombian 1 would say so.
4104 your reaollection serve von as to another of these
Weiss. 'rho one it which tiie Princes, played es as
asstesretwa.,..lt• lbe bssying and selliag of an an-
tonentow. F bat dlil.the automaton do. Was she sitting.
...44pirrisaaliad; or *hat t---.4lse was lathe box. standing

'Too yes esesateg sat* eoadeet mammon to the high dig-
Plesionststet-1 de MA 11114 fleet It was
eat *I lb rook of her Royal iligheret, eeasider-
ke *Mahe was se sash ntiftebed to that tied et ataaseseest.
44aatioa fair winutes heftily four.

.

MON WATER AT J.ONfIO BRIDGE ro•xnaaavr.
Horsing, 46min. after 4.—reening, 7 Ma. after S.

PRICE OF lITUCICStIf
Bank Steel
per Cent. Red. 08{11
I per Ct. Cana. Eel 87
per Cant. 74
6 per Cent,. 64,1
3 pr Ct. Nary 1031
Long Ann. 17 1-16 7-16
lop. per Cat. Ann.

DAY AT ONE O's.:LOti..
India Stock Me
Dittollooda 14. Ik. pa.
Old Annuities Oh
Es, Bills Id. 4s. 5.. pm.
Ditto Cow as. pr.
Mukha
Con. for Aeetirat r
Lou. Tlekots M.**.

gin Matt/Malt
" TAR 11111T11111 STATESMAN" SS INCORPORATED WITS "
AAAAA mix."

LONDON:

THURSDAY HYRNING. OCTORRH 12, MIA.

srocK-F.XCH.INGE, Oise Ciocs.

The Funds, in the course of yesterday after:um..
experienced a sudden depression, owing to some hea.y
sales: and Consols for the November account fell to si7i.
but the market rallied and left MT 67 rithe•
buyers. This re-action is to be attributed main 4
to the parties who hare speculated for the Arcata:,
being principally hears, which of course rinsed all Shoos
brought to market to find ready buyers. There Las been
little alteration this morning, Consuls baring opesPl
at for looney, and this account (via. FAL:
mitt), Mil BMjy for the November, which are its.
about the prices. Money not quite SJ plentiful

Park papers of Monday contain no intelligence of.
importance. In the last sitting of the Spanish Cores
the decree respecting the Majorca*, in its
state, was approved of in 16 articles. The librrty
the press was also decreed. Upon a proposition (rum
the KING, the session, which was to have terminatel
on the 9th instant, has been prolonged for a mont;,,
on arcottnt of the importance of the busbies' remai: -
ing fur discussion. Deputies have been sent to
Mexico in consequence of the Constitution ilavif.s
been there adopted.
French Funds Five per Cents. 71f. -Lk. Bask
Actions, 13,501.

The exultation of the enemies of the Qt.'s:Tv at rt.
embarrassments of Lieutenant Ittsv, and the fr.L.:
avowals of Lieutenant HOWNAM, are unbounded, a,
infinitely beyond the occasion. It shaws,bowever, ~
thing more than the despondency to which the
rates for the Bill of Pains and Penalties had been -
sionsly reduced. They had seen, to their ebagrip.
the case against the Quits conclude, and efface. :Is
it was developed, the unfavourable iespressio^s
which the opening speech of the Arrows ev-Illsr.
RA L had had the fortune to produce. The witnesses
brought forward to establish the charges, had eva
banned all their efforts ; and even before they ..rer•
opposed by evidence in her Majesty's behalf, the ptil,-
lic were completely convinced that the charges were
false and malicious. Ave dillipriti Miter another bad
been destroyed ; and the ease had scarcely a Ise. to
stand upon, when a confusion in the ideas of Lieu,.
FLYNN, produced by the process of ;owe hours severe
cross-examination, was eagerly laid hold of by her
Majesty's enemies as indicating an inc.snsisteney
in his evidence. Not a single article of conseqnethe
was, however, shaken by his mental aberration ; flUt
a shadow of suspicion could attach to his lute.
grity ; and more than one material point in fa-
your of the Quarm was settled by his evidence
11 beyond dispute. The embarrassment produced
u Lieut. Fs.syx, afforded hope that a similar
I.ll'ect might take place on a succeeding experiment ;
and Lieut. HOWNAM was yesterday exposed to a
still more tedious and rigid scrutiny. Elated
at their previous success, the persecutors of
the Queers, congratulate themselves beyond measure
at the reply obtained from this petleman respecting
the place where BIRGAMI was supposed to have slept
on board the polacre on the return to Italy. When
asked if he believed be slept under the tent, his answer
was, " I heard he did, and I believe it." The exul-
tation on the acknowledgment was such as if it wrre
a fresh and great discovery. But after all, it is no-
thing more than what had been admitted. There was
neither concealment nor mystery in the case. " It was
necereary," Mr. flown au said, " that some one should
be near her Royal Highness when she slept upon deck ;
and other persons slept there as well as BF.RGANI. •
On every occasion elan Bina sut was seen there, he
was dressed ; and so far from conveying any idea to
those on boxed that there was any thing criminal or
degrading in the case that when Lieutenant H.
was asked whether, under the circumstances in which,

they were, the sleeping of Bemoans's excited a suspi-
cion that an improper connection subsisted iretwreir
hint and the Princess he firmly and repeatedly declare)
it did not. To the malevolent, we are well aware all ap-
pearances, that east by any means be made cquilual.
are soon afterwards converted into evideure of ci imi
nal (lesiva. But ander the circumstances stated in a
tent on the deck of a ship, at every moment liable
be traversed by ermans, and exposed to constant vlgi •
lance, and dettictioa, II it consistent with probability
to suppose, that each a place conl.l be selerted by per.
sees endowed with common sense, for the it:dui:fear:,
of illicit poseloa, which above all things ju.li, iously
solicits concealment and secrecy ?
Bateau of a private letter from Stafor•l, ,fated Oe-
Usher II :
‘• We arc all here (rinds to the Queen.
Norio, which was taken in at all the Inns, ha' been
dissoothused, as instead of reailiag itt, we threw it
ism the Are. I bog you will send Tog 5141'7%11 L.
H some other indePezilleal Part"a

-0.00101011111.110
-4B • -

liv the F.ir! of Dattst.rv.—Yon have stated, that
tkert was no ms o.ery or concealment on occasion of
liergann s .'weibilig under the tent, wasthere any mys-
ttry oe ronrca!rtient when von slept near her Royal
Illghtress :—Nune whatever.

Lord Duvounitssona.—Did von think it nothing ex-
traordinary that Bergami should be elevated in the
wanner he was, did you think him entitled to it:--From
te manner in which he was treated by the Marquis
lteroglieri I did not think it extraordinary.
Did it excite no suspicion in yOur mind?—None.
bon have declined answering a question relative to
Krs. Ifotruani's sleeping under a tent with her servant,
wish to you what might be the age of Mrs. How-
caw ?—(Cet;eral expression of disapprobation.)
lord I,AcULROALK—Can this be evidence

The Lotto 4.'ftaxceccon—What the age of Mrs.
111Aretin rats hate to do with the Queen's case I cannot
1.0 :wilily determine.
Lord Doy:oratimoast asked another question which
re were astable directly to bear, owing to the andible
disgeisliction of the Peers. The question, by the in-
terposition of the Lord Chancellor warn modyledinto the
followieg:
Doe you think that Lieutenant Flynn ought to be be-
lirvedouhis oath ?-11 think him a perfect man of honour.
I don't wish you to answer the question I am about
**pm to you. unless you choose ; you may do as you
Flease 41)Unt it : but rwish to know, whether from your
knowledge of Lief:tenant Flynn, you believe that his
in/elle:Is are ?Awns clear?
r,t•reral objections were made to the question ; and
tbe Lard Chancellor decided that It could not be asked].
Lord Dc VUXsTANVILLS.—In the voyage from Jaffa,
pa bare stated that Lieutenant Flynn slept on deck,.-
La you not think that when lie slept there, her Royal
Datums was sufficiently protected ?—1 think she was.
Then I wish to ask, if Lieutenant Flynn had slept on
deck daring the whole fof the voyage from Jaffa to Sy-
ram's., would it have been necessary for any one to
sleep under die tent!—There ni;ght.haye been mane
fe34.l:s fur it—from the heavy rolling of the ship. acci-
dents Wight have happetiol, anch as the sea breaking
over-loo3rd, which might render the presence of scout
One neve•siry.
, I
"'u have halt!. that one evening you went tip tne
lathier, and finding the Princess retired to rest, you
ift.w do y-ou reconcile this with your opitiion
"AllbereW" "'doff indecent in Dergand's passing the
1.11116 tlar tent withdrew by the side of the ladder
Jew t!:ere were no other means of getting out, the
feet heng dosell Oil all aides except that.
What could hive occasioned the witness's going from
t!...dinine-rooni up the ladder into the tent was in
hal.it of suing lip on deck that way all day. 1 didn't
1.. JIV the tent tens closed.
Lord Urtosvexon.—Do you know if from any dream-
Prs're•nntt. her Rtiyal Highness entertained any
I:.prehensions for her personal safety?—She did, be-
taw she mentioned it to use.
.lad did s!ie in consequence of inch apprehension.
"Press a wish that she should be more closely attended
the male part of her establishment ?—Yes.
TheMarcnls of Dowries,' it C.---You have stated there
1'34 a quarrel between you and Baron Ompteda ; will
Ms Mee the goodness to state what was the cause of
t!.I quarrel was from the confession of a servant'.
Lout LarmtaDaba objected to the question. • NO
,tight it should he struck off the minntes.
Loan l'itancat.Lost thought that if he had any
f.cts to state, the quesdre ought to be put.
?be Marquis a Downentna.--Did any facts occur
at lte Princess's resident's, that occasioned the quarrel
Letweeu you and the Baron ?---lt was from the con-
fession of the servant; I saw a strratt on his looted
tigtiq pardse for his crimes.