The Statesman.
London, England, 1818-08-14 00:00:00

1.

~t

MI

;if
6r
re

...•

)10. 114, Loudon-road, Southwark.
Cr ASK. FOR TURNIA'S BLACKING.

e
I.


WAT ER ;CLOSETS and PUM l'S.— R.
II A Rl' ASTLE. Son and Successor to the origiont
Manufacturer, and real maker to bis Majesty's Honourable
of ()Hoosier. 49, Berwick-street, Soho; and at No. 9,
Giltspur-street. West Smi,htield ; reams his m-at grateful
thanks to his Cte.tomers oral the Put.l.c at law, far She great
demand he Mil IMP'S to receive for the above articles; at the
sae time begs leave to caution the. Nobility add Gents.
p chasing these articles, as men, persons are selling them of
very inferior masefacture, and calling them his taake a hereht
the• are greatly deceived. Kull shortly put to great expeore in
repairs; madly persons have also been particularly desired by
their Employers to gel Closets, dm. of R. H. and have been
found to go elsewhere midget the worst sad cheapest they could
bud.
R. H. is telling them at very moderate prices, and hopes the
Nobility, Gentry. and others, will honour him with their com-
mand...
Water-Closets. &c. fixed and repaired in the best manner, on
the most reascumble term..
Plunihme in all its branches.

TO THE ADMIRERS OF GLOSSY BOOTS.
RICHARD TURNER'S invaluable JAPAN
BLACK I NG reserves 111111 sifters the Leather, and
im-
, pats the moat bettutifcl jet black ever yet beheld; a..rds can-
not set forth its just praise, nor its transcend:tot qualities be
truly known. but 11$ experience.

joinw+N Rnd, b, the use of ibis eminently superior Blur k.
imp, that their Half-boots and Witlkirg Shoes will he kept soft
and pliable, and resit damp. with the elegancies of a brilliant
halve.
Toe Blocking, may be had. io bottles at 641. Is. and Is. 64.
each, of most Shopkeepers in and all the great tiiwns
In the kin, lom: who may be .upplted through the medium of
>rthulewle houses, or by applying to

C)ee)e9eYiMia

LORD e TOWNSIIEND V. BLAKE.
The goestion in this case w.as merely this—whe-
ther fro, sof an infant ought to let a firm to a
tenant wilt, cold give an annual rent of 4301. or to
ane wit.) aid give 4801. The matter came before
the Lor. Chancellor some time ago, and it was re-
ferred to Matter Stephen, who, after a lapse of sp.
feral months, made his report in favour of the
,mailer rent. Tnis determination was objected to hs
Lord C. Tow usbend, who had en annuity upon the
whole estate, and supported the interests of a Mr
Wightman, who offered the larger sum, and he con-
sequently now brought the quostion before the
Court, no a Petition that the Master might review
his report.
Sir A. PIGGOTT opposed the application on behalf
of the trustees of the estate, who wished to accept a
person of the name of Brett as the tenant, at tho
rent of 4301. He observed, that the point would be
very short if the only dispute were about the two
sums offered ; no doubt-4801. were better than 4301.;
but other circumstances, in the opinion of the Master,
made all the difference. A surveyor of high eminence
bad given it as his opinion, that the value of the farm
was only 4301., and there seemed to be no reason for
disputing his judgment, excepting that the protege of
Lord C. Townshend offered more; but Mr. Brett had
been long a tenant of the property, and had ex-
pended 15001. upon it, and had a claim to have his
lease renewed at a fair and honourable rent.

Sir S. RostiLty did not think it necessary to add
any thing •n the same side, after what his Lordship
had said regarding Drory.lane Theatre.
Mr. HART, on the other hand, insisted that the
matter was quite plain, and the duty of his Lordship
quite clear, though the trustees seemed not unwilling
to abandon their duty, by neglecting the interests of
their cestui qui trust ; they were offered 4831. e•year
by a tenant of substance, and whose father was will.
ing to be his surety for the rent, and for the observ-
ance of covenants ; and on what pretence could they
accept an offer of 501. a year less, by which a thou.
sand guineas would be put into the hands of the
tenant before the espiration of his lease of twenty-
one years?
Sir A. PIGGOTT, in reply, said that the trustees
were under a ,ort of obligation to Mr. Brett to re-
new his lease opon reasonable terms, and it would be
a gross breach of faith on their part not to do so.