The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-05-12 00:00:00

•11,.1,.-

~

spect to what was called party feeling, lie
no man was to be blamed for writing fairly
party ; but attacks upon private character in
of either party was to be thoroughly condemned.
Ile (Mr. S.) had no time to read newspapers in g
is* ene
usa*.
ral;
hates .the.. Noble Mammas had admitted alma
midr of• this Newspaper; be (Mr. S.) would re-
Militia the writer Sad' in one of his papers
beasted-eil keeping. tom all with persons of the most
craned tillt...4llear, bear The object of the
'writer In tha paer was to write down the press. The
House COuldt notp haye foremen that under the reign
of Augustus all libels were declared High Treason.
in consequence of the attacks made by an individual
upon lll‘sttious women. He trusted, however, that
the atempts of this writer would not have the desired
effect. The paragraph in the Times Newspaper,
which was under the consideration of the House in
July 1819, and which was referred to by the Noble
Marquess, consisted of a misrepresentation of the
speech of one of its Members. Whether that case
was parallel to the present was for the consideration
of the iln. The present libel smelt of blood. If
the writer wished to bring the parties to extremities
be wished to bring a man into the field, he
could not have taken a course more likely to prove
elfeetryd than that he had taken. In all cases he
thought the public would respect those papers the
nase:t which abstained from attacks upon individuals
1,,.t certainly, upon a view of the two cases, be
thought the case of 1819 would bear no comparison
with the present.
The Marquess of LONDONDERRY was sorry if
;toy thing haul fallen from him which might have the ap-
pearance of warmth. Ile however could scarely re-
vret it, as it had occasioned an explanation from the
llonnerable atilt Learned (lentleman which removed
asst' impret riots whih might have existed as to a
•Ilqw.aeal tolerati hy his Majesty's Council, or the
I...essieil of the Nation, of the publication in ques-
li•vs. Ile cold,' not recognise the distinction which
hail beets 'lieu n between the two libels. That of
I -419 had led to a message from his Right Honour-
.tle Friend to the Ilossousalole Member for Ahertleesi,
%%lath plo:liteed an honourable and manly explana-
Cm. Ile thouglit the House would expose itself to a
sospiolusi of partiality by pronottuLing a judgment
rtiffer•olt from th st of
Sir It. FEROCSON explainetk—The Noble Mar-
ilee:as opiiasite bad attributed motives to him ; but he
thou;!:. the Noble Marquess had better l ok to
o his
op u, Ile (Sir It.) had o ily expressed what be
tirvanglit r.as bea:oseing indignation against attack.,
upon defeucel.:ss %town.
'the Marquess of LONDON DF.RRY appealed to the
tlosise setether he Lad imputed any motives to the
!,,.pant lienera.ll. Ile only regretted that the indigna-
tia,as of the House had not been as strongly marked
its one LASO as it appeared to be in the other.
Mr. lY YNNE said, that in all cases like theooke pre-
sent he had taken an equal coarse; an d bad ld I
only to the moor of the House. He thought that in
the sour,; of the last autumn libl•le bad been issued ae
wool, sipaus one side as on the other ; libels disgraceful
atilt the press and to those who had to administer
the course of justice. Had they occurred duringf
the
the
sitting of the House, be thou the vengeance o
ght
Hosea: otti;lst to have been visited upun the authors.
Tl.e libel which bad been brought snider consideraion
two •:ears age, was, he thought, a most flagitiiius libel.
it vatted, as a part of a weeds, that which had never
Le. or spolaen, and marked the part by the supposed
pi abation of the house. The writer, on being called
to the Bar, said lie hart tuistalreu the lauguage, but he
(Mr. Vi..) thiiught it scarely possible. however, as a
6iewL:r hail intimated an upiniou that the writer
usiAst have been mistaken, the pursisluneut was usiti-
ga;e!'. L was his firm belief that the remilib ss ion
In•
ls. of the
on that occasion had encouraged e
%Led, lac considered the lenity of the Housesuen bad been
the
taa.taken on that occasion. If the antendt of
hoble arquess wee adopted he thought it would be
wolth nMo
Member'sr while to, make any complaint to
the House. Ile had seen many wilful tuisrepresenta
in•e:i of the debates of the House ; but in the present
.tT.C, he looked to the question i ttttt sediately before
him. If the person who bail been examined at the
1:..r Lad shewn any dispositiou to tell the truth, lie
• si, odd have been glad to lay bold of any put circunssntance
wairls could be offered iu mitigation of
ishmet ;
lb.o as he considered the present a libel of the grossest
.1, sea•iption, he should vote fur the original motion ;
lir he thought the support of .the privileges of the
ilause, nearly connected with the liberties of
lie the d
not
The peoplot
e.
The Marquis of LONDONDERRY said a
rleasied the atrocity of the pro.ent libel. Ile merely wished
se to have regard to its formerjutlgtueuts in Ili-
the house
miler cases.
Mr. WARD said he should always support an equal
distribittiou of justice, for he considered that nothinw
tauld bit ware injurious than an opinion that it would
b.- safer to attack a gentleman of one party than of
aeotber. The lion Member then referred to the libel
tit 1619. It stated (profeising to report a speech of
C.a Hon. Member for Aberdeen) that Isis Right Hon.
Friend had rendered himself indifferent to the
objects
kegs of Isis fellow creatures, by usaking them
-of habitual ridicule. This was a general attack upon
• titan's whole life; and was more difficult to answer
titan a specific charge. He thought
jhe House should
act consistently, awl give tbe same udgment on the
present occasion, as it had given in the year 1819.
- Mr. WYNNE explained.
Lord J. RUSSELL thought, that in cases of privi-
lege the wilder punishment was always the best. Oa
the occasion referred to by the libel of 1819, there
-certainly had been a laugh, and this bad given rise
ht lion. Member
to an erroneous opinion that the Rig
alluded to bad turned the sufferiags of his fellow-cres-
tures into ridicule. He could lot recognise the dis-
tinction which bad been taken betw Noble the two c
ue
s
Haft instance, a probe accased.th tduq
of cruelty chitin his GovernaMat in Ireland. it refer-
- red to a prt of his public cambia. and was capable
of contradiction : bat this was very different from the
case in whieb an attack *as made span the females of
**loftily. • Charges of sack a description were al-
theWort painfal.aboagb y were es false es hell; for
• theft *as a &Buoy aloft thifeasala diarists,: wlieis
' *nide* pubile.wftko. TIN libel. titakidgaseat upon
41'18111:st bemeoUoi as a p _coald not be COSI
• Simla tehiehttpeared is the owe-
paper Wore the lismeit; tit 110 regraisd that he
no# not acquit tie Mateo/ Goescowearef the
charge
Of *muftis( tire popir• lio bad bees 'gives to as-

—ne josses correct in his foreign pediries,
was is his Irish information.—(4k laugb.)--lf the No-
ble Lord would satisfy hint that any person in his
office inid circulated this paper in the way to which
the Noble fiord had alluileil, that person should he imt
-
mediately discharged.—(llear, bear.)—Witls respec
to female honour, lie knew not whether he might ven- '
ture to rival the Noble Lord in this respect.(he %l ov A lngh.)
—but he could asEnre the Noble Lord that ed
any attack upon female honour with as much indigna-
tion as himself. Libels however of the most atrocious
descriptions had been circulated against the highest
characters, and bail been but too generally encouraged.
Even Majesty itself had been attacked in the most
daring manner; and be should be glad to know whe-
ther the Noble Lord himself bad never taken in Mr.
Publication.—(Cheer.)
Mr. COURTENAY said, the attention of the House
ought not to be drawn into a general discussion, when
the immediate question arose out of a distinct para-
graph, Ile thought the analogy of the two cases per-
fectly clear. The libel ;vas equally fastributelse in bodthwi cthasean
s;
and justice, he thought, should be di
equal hand.
Lord JOHN RUS`IEI.I., in explanation, observed,
that lie could not say that he had taken in Mr. Ilune"a
publications.
Mr. W. SMITH said, be would never give his ante
for bringing a Printer to the Bar of that 'loose for
what is called a political libel. The present case,
however, was that resulted from a false accusa-
tion against a Member of having told a falsehood froth
fear. The acrusatiiiii might have led to a marderous
quarrel, and lie tliwiOit to punishment too severe for
it. The libel of 1819 involved a question of iiiterest.
Ile'thought the person who was called to the Bar of
the House in 1819 had not misrepresented wilfully.—
The present was a wilful and malicious andlie
therefore should vote for the severer punishment. It
really messed that his Noble Friend (Lord Nugent)
wished this delinquent to escape. merely bte4use
he
was a mean, dirty. prevaricating
Mr. C. HUTCHINSON protested against the com-
parison of the two cases. This he thought was eon
fonnding innocence with guilt. 'flte individual (Mt.
Collier) who was at the Bar in 1819, was a gentleman
of high respectability, and belonged to a most respect-
able estisblisloneut. That gentleman h d
a no infer no
ntion
to the feelings of any one, and lie believ
one at their Bar had ever couiluctril himself with
no
so
touch propriety and warmness as Mr. Collier, and
man bad ever Iv 'en subjected toed he censure of the
House more i miner ily. The prnt, on the other
hand, was a case of a ;Joss, malici.os-, awl unmanly
libel. Ile was generally inclined to leitimit ptinislo-
ment in ail cases ; and, his object in risito; bad been
principally to do joisti;:e to it Must r.:liectable
Mr. WILMOT said lie sLaultl soopport the motion
for the severer punishment, as he the ailalogy
which had beets drawn between the ta ca..e., was com-
pletely destroyed.
Mr. BARING said that morn of party fe.li!.%
been exhibited in the debate than lie count{ have %Oiled;
hut lie trusted lion. Members I ilieist themselves
of this feeling on coming to the ..iste. He regretted
that the Howe conlil coaie to an ummituous
decision.
Mr. BANKF,S b• gged soggest ta his Noble
Friend (the Marquess of Lonionderry), that lie should
withdraw lilt: Amendment,' a considerable part of the
Howe was opposed to it.
The Marquess of LON DON JERRY said, that what
lie hail heard in the course •if the na l
mslew om thof e two
cases had certainly altered his origioa l'o 19
present question, and he thought the precedent of
had better be broken than observed. Ile therefore
should certainly withdraw his AmendmenetNoble Mar-
.
Sir .1. MACKINTI /Sll said, that as th
quess had withdrawn Isis Amendment, in eiinsequenee
of what bail passed, lie presumed liis Noble Friend
(laird Nugent) would fr !WIPP
.fil:fitai feel himself
pressed to withdraw his Amendment, whirl% was for the
mildest punishment of all. 'llse paper in quest
stilityion
lie thought was directed by the must
savage ho,
and hail a tendency to harbarixe political %carfare.
Lord said, thit feeling that
withdraw of
motion.
Mr. BROUGHAM said, that as the case of
hi s r.
Collier was so touch alluded to, ho rose to state M
re-
collection of the circumstances. After alluding tn.
those circumstances, the lion. and Learned Gentlenits'
said, that the ease of Mr. Collier was not one of wilfil
misrepresentation. When called to the Bar,
his manner
was such as made a favourable impression, and was no,
doubt taken into account. The consiltency of 146'1
statement was also considered, and there WAS also the
evidence of a Member of that House, who hail soli
that, to the best of his recollection, the lion. Membe
for Aberdeen bad made use of words similar to those;
which were reported by Mr. Collier. T here wal
another piece of confirmatory evidence, namely, the
evidence by Members of that House of the respecham)
tabi.
lity of Mr. Collier's character. if he (yi r. Broug
thought that Mr. Collier had been guilty of putting
into the mouth of a Member of that House malicious
falsehoods, in order to gratify his own malignity,
for ,
that were he charge against the young gentleman, no
considion of lenity would induce him to rote in
that case for a lesser punishment. The tase of Mr.
Collier was entirely digereut from the case before the
House. There was nothing to exculpate the party,
but, on the contrary, there was the absence of every
extenuating circumstance. lie believed that he would
concur with the sentiments of the majority of the
House, by voting for the more severe punishment.
Lord NUORNT said, that though be withdrew his
Amendment in deference to the House, he did nut at the
same time surrender Isis own opinion.
The House then divided on Mr. Daring's motion,
when there appeared--•
For the Mottos 106
Ageism It .............................
Majority►fer eh. •
modem for comialmleg
Cooper to ile!gate • ... 96 •
thqing tbttr exclusioeu of stra
ngers. we understand
lint ifs. W. 151111tfi Moved. that Robert
`sore, Thomas iirretismith. and Wm. Slacken, had
guilty of gross rossrleation is giving their eek
it the Bar of the geese.

Auk Perriftalite•Nleat they had (long._
of en exinainatioa. Attie Oat: of that_ Haase into their
private concerns.
.14Est..eicatoinatert.—!ta0_,Tertaityi
been carried further pan even beam
house ever to bate .gone before,
hadit 124 beta
fur the obbapty attached-to such an iacerfesimass,
should more than ones have stood np for the istetees
Lion of the witnessei against questions tending to,
criminate themselves. Besides skis, taang Mesabi
could MK be prepared se vote ea this part of the qa
lion, not having been present during the whole of the
evidence. In order to enatfle them to form a judg•
went, the evidence ought to 'be printed ; but he was
prevented from voting for that, from,a conviction that
a great part of the examination bad been. of so iadie;
creel a nature on the part of the House, that it woul4
not reflect much credit upon it.
Sir J. NIACKINTOSII expressed deep regret that
his Hon. Friend who had just spoken should have been
able to sit silently by, and witness the continuance of
an examination which be considered as derogatory to
the House, and dangerous to its reputation, without in-
terfering. Ile did not know how his lion. Friend
could reconcile to his mind, for fear of the obloquy
attendant upon interference, to remain silent, whilst
a radically unjust and oppressive course was being,
pursued by the Howe. When it was too late,
and the statement was gone abroad, he could
get up and do his utmost to bring the greatest
unpopularity upon the House, as far as iu him lay. He
regretted shat a man
such hstatem e highly esteemed could \
be capable of making
lie ',petted als.) that he did not point out in
what respects in th:s exatninatiott the House had gone
beyond the bounds set by the former practi
►ce of Par-
liament in similar cases. hie (Sir J. Mac k intosh)
maintained that they acre to lie guided in this case by
the Ira. a rorstreivdo Parliame4ti, and as the Hon.
Member hail not pointed out any deviation from that
print iple, he would undertake to•be stile to slim, that
in the material parts of the examination there had
been no transgression of the practice of Parliament
hitherto. Besides, he conceived his Hon. Friend had
made a direct reflection on the want of proper
lance in that Right Hon. Persoo, who, front his office,
is the guareian of the honour and good conduct of
that Hou e. Hail his watchfulness slumbered for a
moment such an improper course would have been
stopped by sonie Hon. Meinber ; for he was sure there
were some who would not have silently looked on and
suffered the House to cast disgrace and infamy on
itself, and then come forward, when too late, to rivet
that disgrace the more firmly. He hail before de-
flared how notch he deplored the litlawartuness of
many Members of that House, but now Ire must state
that if lie thought -there were many who could be
guilty of such conduct as this, he should think the
Muse near its destruction.
Mr. S. BOURN!: in explanation, said he
atill never
used the words " infamy" of
" disgrace" astill
less load lie applied them to that House. He ball
il
stated his fair opinions, and lie must say, that Ise st
thought that it was carrving on examination beyond
its just limits, when it went to elicit answers render-
ing the persons who gave them liable to punishment
for the office which they proved thereby against them-
selves.—(Cheers.)—Ile had so often on former occa-
sion- interf..red to rc;traiii questions without success,
th.ot lie confessed he fr!t backward to don
self the obloquy of so tieing w asraw him-
hen it wto have no

effect.
Sir .1. M ICK I NTOSII explained.
Mr. SU A ItLETT (Ibsen el, that the length and mi-
nuteness of exAmination complained of by the Right
Hon. Menel,er were rendered necessary by the prevari-
cation of the witnesses, which made it necessary to
send for all the others.
Sir W. DE URESl'lli's Y made a few oby.ervations,
which were not audible in the (rall,
ry.
Lord NI GENT and Mr. S:BOUKNI'. mutnally ex
plaided.
Mr. WYNNE sail, that the witness Weaver had
been clea.ly guilty of prevarication, and it was diffi-
cult to object to a question, unless the motive of the
examinant was known.
The Marquis of LONDONDERRY said, that he
should not know how to act as to the conduct of the
remaining parties at the Bar, not hav
Hing heard 11111
whole of the evidence given. Many on. Members
must be similarly situated, and unless it were sashimi
to give a preTipitate character to thproceedeir proceenodinfurthergs, he
thought it would he advisable to
till the evidence was printed and in the hands of the
House.
Sir J. NEWPORT said a few words, which wet*
inaudible in the Gallery.
Mr. DENMAN said he was in the same situations'
the Noble Marquis, and was therefore desirous thetas,
L evidence should be printed.
Mr. BERN AL thought that after the Hon. Member
for Shrewsbury bad cleared up his honour, it worthd
have been heeler not to have proceeded with this case.
Mr. W. SMITH contended that the House mast
hare the power of doming at the truth by examine-
doe ; and if it possessed that power, it must also pos-
sess the power of censuring it for prevarication at the
Bar. lf the House were to agree to come to resolu-
tions of censure, he thould not wish to go any farther,
and it would then be unnecesisryh to pant the
of evthis
i-
dence. He m,ved, s• That it opinion
House, that R. T. Weaver has grossly prevaricated in
the evidence he has given befUre this House."
Mr.g. WILSON said, that having been present
durinithe whole of the examination, he was enabled
to state that there was more impropriety in the exit-
ruination of the House, than prevaricatiott on the part
of the witness. It did not appear to him that the
witness Wester had been guilty of that prevarication
ascribed to him. He believed that Messrs. Sbackell
and Arrowsurith, finding the difficulties they were
likely to get ipto from the nature of their publication
had some titnelleikk made a bawd* with Waiver, that
if be would talsi Ihs respousibilittaff &it backs, he
should in reit,* become 'proprietor. Cfieldering
tfie
time they hat already spent In was not
dlartrigalra llottsetikitalf. •ir
V set So ledefeekit the s►beld'i~
As Kt owd istrialtiiiirelai if *At tv.
OW a ilise~.l6o.ldeettlll eledice

. .
%. •
e I j

I

draw his amendment,
sAlt.
T. Weavor be ordered into the custody of the Ret-
icent at Arm; and be brought- to the Bar, to %beef
I mended by the Spealser." This was opporied hi
r. %tercels, who tuoved, " That R. T. Weaver lt•e-
at to Nee/gate." •- On this the House divided, 'elm
!,the numbers were :—For MY. Smith's motion, t 7.-.
Against it, 31—Majority in• favour of Mr. Wyelle's
Amendment, 7. .
When strangers were readmitted.
Mr. BROUGHAM was speaking. He was net'irv.
. . .
pared to give a vote on the case of the individualssais
before the House, without having the printe tide
tA
before him. Whether they had prevaricated or nottha,
did not know at that time, and therefore he %fished-the
further consideration of the subject to be adjourned:
Mr. BARING wad Sir J. NawronY offered a few words
which could trot he distinctly heard in the Gallery. - • •
Sir W. DE CII;ESPIGNY moved that the eviletee
should be printed.
Sir C. LONG hearing the whole of Mr. Artemisia''s.
evidence, could see nothing like prevarication in it. He
had heard nearly the whole of Mr. Weaver's evidence,
and did not see that he bad prevaricated. Ile doebted
whether, consistently with the dignity of the Rims%
they could go further.
Mr. BARING wished the %notion to be withdrawn.
It did not seem desirable that they should rotted for-
ther. lie did not know that the parties bad prevari-
cated. Though their elide:it's was by no meamilear,
he dill not think they would be justified iu.doiag ISM
than they bud already done. . .
Colonel DAVI Ei thought it would appear rather ex
traordinary if they were now to. stop short and let the.
two greater delinonenta escape punishment. It.auight
be better not to notice such cases at ail ; but if me
taken up, they could admit of no half measures, and
might to go on. Ile hoped the motion would be rm.
I vend in.
Mr. C. WYNN bad nn floats', and he thonght.the
1 I House could have nuoe, that the individual on whim
case they had now to decide, where the props ietors eldest
paper. To Lim it appeared that they n ere wore gellty
than the men of straw who bat been already committed
to Newgate. Ile did iiw comit•r that it was necessary
Ito print the evidence. Ili a case 111 re the present, wheel
the offence complained of teas proved to have been Mee
witted by the parties brought before them,
he thoegk
the heaviest punishment ought to he inflicted.
Sir W. 1)E CRESPIGNY considered there were
sufficient grounds fur moving that the evidence shosM
be printrd.
The Gallery was cleared for a division, but the Hosts
did not divide. We understand the minutes of evidence
were ord...red to be printed ; and it was intimated t
=eat li-
o
Messrs. Arrowstuith and Shackle that they
berty to depart.
AFFAIRS OF EUROPE.
Mr. R. WARD move I.thae the House ehouldtadve
itself into a Cottinatee of Supply.
Mr. C. 111:11 HINSON, thoagh he kad se 11011
addressed the House on the subject of the pre=
state of Earope, was desirous of again calks/ the
attention of the House to the passing even,
which he thought endangered the liberties of this
country as well a; rollers, and at least record tie ors
intoon the Journals. Ile wished to go at lair
into the subject, but feeling for various imam's, did
it would be improper to detain the House thee, hi
would fie a etotion for the first open day, which Me
Tuesday, time '22J inst.
ORDN A SCE.
Mr. iII:ME called the emotion of the llouse to tk
t r esavagatme of the Ordnanee estliaitl.lihad been rsloorent. Ile me
the more anxious to du ttii,,tletnan, the Clerk
it
stated by the llontiurable lien%
Ordnance, that the utmost anxiety bad been maillielb
ed by the Noble Duke at the head of that departed*
to adopt measures of economy in every depal,32lolrtures&
The estimate for the present year was
This was 53,0001. less than the estimate for 1
but making a deduction, which ought to be takes le
the.accontit for old stores, from this apparent krill
it would be found that the public paid exactly
&
same as in 1820. In the three years 1790, 1791, tat
2, the average amount of the Ordnance &lime
179
was 473,0001. Their average amount in ISIS, ISM
and In2o, was 1,06,6531. being three time
as that of the former period. It ought to be km&
the House that there was a difference between these'
Mates for the Ordnance, and the actual expeadiell.i.
amounting to some hundreds of thousauls of pee!
To alien this, he would take'three years, 18171 116
and 1f419, the accounted those having beets rift
From these it would be teen that the total 1111!Ifit
the Ordnance Estimates iti those years was .P.12:7i
The Espeoditere was -- - • Myer—
'Making a difference of -- - - _,alts
la the Ordnance Estimates nothing was cb;67;04
Alpe used to carry sores backwards and
AM,
yet these, it would be found, created s
.....
11,500/. He 'adverted to other charge, lb at la
kept out of sight, complained of she mode is. "re,l
the 'accounts were kept, and repeated what b Liv
before asserted that so far VMS that departsoll:
being distinguished by i:s regard for ecismioalot;
the greatest negligence prevailed. It
=pliantly announced to the Houle, that GS joi
connected with the Ordnance bad been red
do Noble Doke (the Duke of reilinKlen) beii.iitlis
placed at the bead of the department. Bet it selt.
= the Returns lie had =veil for, that sioce 1114"
sew appointments had taken place. 11.“!.44.10
do
situations of those who were placed on lialf-pse•
of these who bad been so lately. appointed, 100 W
Bpliaiscesereestp:oerrn
:11:-epersompriy.solcroi,sfotirriviiioessaygeceeis.01;eadrvireeid..:ili
were Wit 17 or 18 years of age, and one
6 wel/
0 rare end 10 soatbs, Ile tliestkite
Seed el Cleaseitee was pet entit.lea to t,
Hotter. es aiVey deperrest alight;
to the Witenittot stet mpitilennoiste.
otateAtisigla 11110001: Writ than

-_

.... .
f .1 I, .
.‘
- Ii• . N, . , •
I
. . t
.—...- - ---- .
1111 N arication, it was in those nitnesses. They all (of
tho ..e • . orss.,se . o . . ilsore . re- . mission to the Gal -eau t
.. hose Frouse engaged in a di.cussion as to the mode of dis- them seemed to have some mental reservation, and in
y frig is sad.rs representing his Majesty abroad.
a favour almila•k-i* tht I.llolooearie 4eriltifrisii—eloOkol. 11..ingfilign , togri.:ll4loo4-biste oisterntsp. ever answer sliewed a wish to imbue a different mean-
-..--. - -
ideusned. paid for a moral assarinaoion.. tam the onei;tfrit .4, _ 1611 ' '•%. 1 ing *from %%hat they in fact entertained.
.....gal: The Marquess of 4,4,t;))0 ,N,..DE,.....4Rit.ysiestalawilhresigaoshitlee
inilirr.e'inbermonrvilmismortirfi.; Nir tbsterra•Useurisiornsaaeliehlwas prowielaced
.4eTehei(ilitrioskrey.a:estleie.nt,ccituaordederfignor aidsairoseisiocann.
tera.
• • -----6...uthat thee had donkin the course tion ensued, when Mr. W. Sutra prop rsed to with:
. - .. _e_ Armor his amendment, and substitute for it, "That It
. - _ 1— ...f al.. IL..