The Statesman.
London, England, 1822-07-10 00:00:00

1!i .1 ws4 a rase of constrißtive .obor:;eilK—This
a as a (*cot aired' attack not a Member in flit,' disrh,ege
of bis date. *: The ,Estiection should be 'trended to
in the in airy. Add to that, that the Imam had before
it the information that steps were in the room of heing
t be% which, if not a ted, might lead to a very an-
ti rtnnate issue. They wroth.] then see how:necessary It
nal to proceed withont delay—first, to declare that a
breach of privilege had been committed, and then pro-
c, ed to take the preventive measures. Tb;.‘ was not Mc..
the case n here two Members who differed in opinion in
the house, were likely to take hostih• steps against each
other. In that ewe the words wets heard by the hones.
and they proceeded to pass Ind • anent. There was even
a ,•ace where a eltnyemation hail (lectured in the lobby,
Which was report,il to the house by a Member who had
beard it, and the house immediately took proreedings on
that report. Ile considered that it would he injustice to
the absent Member to proceed against him Inge first in-
stattre—for nreletthteelly a motion to command his at-
tend:Awe in that house must hr considered as against him,
and that before oneword was laid,or a step taken against
the it root., doer. They ought not to impose any restric-
tion on their Member, except in the event of apprehend•
inE an altercation—aril not even then, nrtil equal jes-
tier was a,:otiristered to all the par its. It was right
that the lions.. should come to some unanimous &tenni-
e:clicn, that would show in the iontdie their resolution to
pot down a system which would, if not arrested, cot up
etc the rents every vestige of their privileges. There
was not i shadow of coanparison between the meet inde-
cent attArk• on the lionse as a body, as the singling
out of a Member, and making his conduct, whilst
in the di,eltarge of his duty, the subject of animadver-
sion.
Air. WYNN fully aereed in the latter observations of
the tit 0. Member. Every eQort in their power should
hr din-toed towards the upholding of the inviolability of
a tnetnlwr of that house. The house would have no
did:matt- in interfering et ith a view to prevent anv nut-
fortnnate rove ijuences in this ease, though one of the
parties aces not a member of ti is (muse. The rase of
Lord !tosser, aid the Earl of Sunderland furnished a
precedent for their interference.
Lori BINNING said that be would yield to the sense,
of the house, and withdr to' all opposition.
-After a few words from fur. I'OURTIIXAY, the motion
that the said extracts, commenting• on the speech of a
24;.t0i er of that house, ere a breach of its privileges,
eaerbd are. con.
Mr. lY YNN said, that this question being disposed
they most follow the proceeding up.
The SPEAKER suggested the coarse of ordering the
hinter to the Bar.
laird RINI. said be knew that one ofthe printers
was a resident at Edinburgh.
Mr. TIF.IINEY said, that if they
.proceeded to sum-
er en the printer, and wait for his sentence to summon
the authors, the ease must necessarily plover to another
Session. Ile was sure the'. if any tentleman on the other
aide was artinainted with the tact, he would have no
eiffieulty in avowing the anther.
Lord BINNINH said he felt no difficulty in stating
that he had not ilte smallest doubt that every word of ,
the letter was written by Mr. John Hope. tie felt toot
the least hesitation in making !his avowal, fur he was
perenaded, that if Mr. Hope were at the Ham be would
instant'/ ae,nowledge that he was rill'. anther.
Mr. WYNN suggested that an order for his attend-
ance ought to be made.
Mr. ELLICE said the house had no difficulty in at
once proceeding to dispose of the case of Mr. Hothouse
upon his (Mr. Ellice) stating in his place, that he
was authorised by Mr. Ilobhouse to avow the publi-
cation.
Me. WNNN said, that in that case the Honourable
Member was authorised to avow the publication; Isere
the Noble Lord went no farther than stating that be bad I
no 'tomtit of its being written by Mr. Hope.
Mr. lY VNN then moved that Mr.Joitn Hope do attend I
the bar of that house to-morrow sennight.
The Clerk then, by order of the house, proceeded to
read the letter of Mr. Menzies, addressed to the Editoirs

of the Carrier Newspaper. In the first sentence the
anthor appeared to allude to the oh Lions of Mr.
Ahercrbanhy, not as the observation of a Malabar of Par-
liament, but as a statement contained in a ner:paper,
reflecting on his character, and such as lie had a right
to take coeninnre of.

Mr. HetililSSON interrupted the reading of the let-
ter here, and stated that it was plain that this was a letter
addressed to the Editor of the Courier, in which the
writer ;aimless ro something which he (the Editor) put
forth. severely reflecting on his character. Now if an
imflvidual was not at liberty to remonstrate with an
Editor for a personal attack on his character, there was
an end of justice.
Mr. TIERNEY wools' beg the attention of the house
to the nature of the case. Mr. Menzies wrote a letter to
the c'ouri,.r ; in this letter he introduced a correspond-
erre whir, passed between him and Mr. Abercromby.
It appears that the latter refuses to give any explana-
tion, and then Mr. Menzies proceeds to tell the Editor
of the Courier that whoever used words so reported by
him had spoken that whirls was false. Could any one
doubt the object of this statement ? If a Member of Par-
liament were thus to be dragged through the newspa-
pers. there was an end of their privileges. lie protested,
thorefore, against the special pleading that would make
a distinction of the nature contemplated by the Right
Honourable Hentleman. They talked of the dignity of
the House. It wools! be vain to use suds language,
it they were to make their privileges depend on trifling
. •
retmesuents. Let the whole substance of the letter be
!miked at. and he would defy any man to say that •
breads of their privileges was not committed.
Mr. HUSNISSON did not wish to interrupt the pro-
reeding; by a cavil. lie wished them to proceed con-
sistently.
After a few further observations from Mr. TIERNEY.
. The Clerk again proceeded to read by Mr. Menzies'
letter.

The ithrgness of LONDONDERRY interposed. He
would submit to the house if it would not be advisable to
move at once for the attendance of the Hon. hletuber.—
(Hear.)
Mr. WYNN then MOVPII that " the lion. Janie% Alter-
eronitiv do forthwith attend his place in that house."—
Arrrea to stem. eoa.
Tire Clerk thru read Mr. Menai& letter, as follows
To the Editor.
_

" 101, George-street, Edinhuigh, July 5, 1822.
"Sir,—ln ronseqnenee of certain expresstoes which
appeared in what you published as being a report of Mr.
Alp.ocronthv's speech, on the conduct of the Lord Advo-
cate, the following correspondence has taken place,
whirb, I have no doubt, you will do me the justice now
to insert in your paper.
'lo the Gnu. James Abercromhy, M.P.
' 101, George-street, Edinburgh, June 29, HU.

Sir,—l have ohm-reed, in the reports of vnnr Iy...web
ni the conduct of the Lori Advocate of Scotland, pub-
lished in thr Al.irriH6• Chrohiele and 'Courier Hewspa•
Vera, that yon are represenred as having made use of the
fallowing expressions: —•• Yet, notwithstanding this, up-
started, at every moment, a barrister, stating that he, as
Counsel for Mr. Alexander, must object to one whims
blAng allowed to remain in Court while the examination
of the other was going on, as he intended to cal all the
witnesses on the following Moodily. upon the trial of
Mr. Borthwick. The House must at once perceive the
'votive with which this farce was kept up. But by
•m was it so kept up? It was kept tip by a gentle-
) • 1 rho , as the Leatereil turd very well knew, waste,-
if not always, employed hr him as an assistant

-4W‘

S - - S SS

-~..,

..ate

to the duties of his office. The Noble Lord knew %Mail
he knew the feeling which tad keen rodeavoirred.to be
kept up; sod yet, within forty.eigh' hours after the ac-
quittal of Mr. Stuart, Mr. Borth wick was sent &wail
without say trial."
' Outing the trial of Mr. Smart, I, as counsel for Mr.
Alexander, moved the Court that at; the witnesses who
were to he examined on that trial, and whose names
were included in the list of witnesses for the trial oh
Borthwick, should be directed by the Court to withdraw,
as soon as tiny had given their Lvideee;,, in order that,
as they were to he examined upon the same facts in
Borthwick a trial on the Monday f,ilowirg, they might
rot have en opportunity of hearirs each other's t,ti•
mony. My caution having been granted, I atterwar Is
pointed out to the Court two witnesses who were in the
situation now described.
' By the expressions you are reported to have used, it
is more than insinuated that, knowing. row it Woe t.nt
intended to bring Borthwick to trial at vii, I. under she
direction of, or in concert with, the Lord Advocate,
mile the above motion, for the !Impose of exciting a
prejudice against Mr. Stuart, unfavourable to his tie-
fenee.
• As I believe that there statements could only hare
been made by you, In rowequettcr of your being igno-
rant of the real facts of the cite, and of veer having. rm.
ceived false information on the subject, 1 deeto it right
to inform you. that I was in no way employed on the
trial M Mr: Stuart. sad bad no communication with the
Lord Advocate in regard to it. Some time previous to ,
the trial of Mr. Stuart, I was retained by the private
agent of Nr. Alexander, as Counsel for hint in certain
actions, one of which was the criminal prosecution at
his instance ageism Bortbwicit. The .Lord Advocate
neither advised nor was consulted as to any of the pro.
coding. in this action, in so far ae is knowrr to me; and
the motion I made as to the removal of the it itness was
the result of my own professional opinion, awl in dis-
charge of what I conceived to be my duty to toy client
Alexander.
' At the lime I pilule that motion it was the intention
of Alexander and his Counsel to proceed with the trial
of Borthwick ; and it was nut until after Mr. Stuart's
,trial that this intention was relinquished. In coining to
tihiu resolution. the Counsel for Alexander were in no
respect actuated by any regard to the wishes of the Lord
Advocate, with whom they held no communication on
the subject.
I believe, that when the Lord Advocate left Edin
burgh, he did not 'mow that the intentiop of trying
Borthwick had been abandoned; and even if he bad
known it, he could not have prevented the prosecution
being given up.
I certainly have ---"son to conga:lie that my conduct
should hare been attacked, without any

reason to cowl
tvt publioiy at,
Previous notice ha • lleoskgsven to me, or any proper
inquiry made as to facts; and I trust you will not
hesitate to make theonly reparation in your power, fur
the injurious misrepresentation which you have, unin-
tentionally I believe, given of my conduct, by communi-
cating to me the information which you proceeded, and
the source from which you obtained it, and by taking
theearliest opportunity of publishing this st•itement of
the facts of the ease. an the same way in which you did
the mirstatesuest of which I have so murk reason to
complain.
I am,Sir. your obedient serrtnt,
(Signori) 'W. MENZIES, Advocate.'
In answer to the above 1 have just received the_ fol.
loiring communication through the !lauds of Mr. Henry
Cockburn:
To W. Menzies, Esq. Advocate,
• New-street, Spring-gardens.
I Sir. I hays jest bad the honour of receiving you'
hitter. Having no influence or control over the state.
Monts contained is newspapers of what I may have said
In Parliament, 1 owe it to myself, and still more to other
Members of Parliameat and to the Howe, not to enter
into aey.explanatiee with respect-4o expressioWleir,sin-
finseaft imputed f 0 cm on ties authority of newspapers

is satisfactory So me to find, that as far as my me-
ry serves Ise to recall what I did say, it is sett:a.m.
daily confirmed ►y the statement in your letter.
' 1 have the honour to be, Sir, your most obedient ser
want. • .1. AHEM:1:0311.1Y:

" I feel no inclination to make any comments es the
above correspondence.
I shall be content with saying, that in what you put
forth as a fair report of Mr. iibercromby's speech, im-
proper motives were. by very strong inuendo and impli-
cation attributed to me. Such imputations I regard with
the most perfect scorn, and 1 have now shoo n that
whoever was the real author of them, they were alto-
gether nnwarraoted, groundless, and false.
" I em, Sir, Ise. W. MENZInS."
Mr. COURTENAY now rose with a view of setting
himself right with the House, as to the motives which
prompted him to bring this tnatter forward. The house
had heard the letters read, and he appealed to every
tictitlenian present, whether or not he had come to a
hasty conclusion in pronouncing it an undue and offen-
sive interference with a Heinber in the discharge of his
duty. And if it was offensive in itself, it was addition-
ally so from the channel through which it was convey-
ed--namoly, a public newspaper. It appeared that the
communication from Mr. Ahercromby was sent through
a tiontleman, and therefore; it was private, which, when
contrasted with the publicity given to it by the other
party, was not very creditable to him. Mr. Menzies,
not satisfied with interfering with a Member of Parlia-
ment, thought fit to lay the whole affair before the pub-
lic, and this course, in his (Mr. Courteoav's) opition,
imposed upon the house a necessity of taking some no-
tire of the matter.—(Hear.)—These were the motives
which induced him to bring the question forward. The
Hon. Member concluded by moving—" That the said
publication having taken notice of the speech of a Metn.
her of this house, delivered in his place, is a breach of
the privileges of the horse."
The Marquess of LONDONDERRY seconded the
motion. There was not upon his tuind a doubt that the
letter in question was a breach of the privileges of the
House. tie was sot, however, disposed to view the ex-
pressing's in it in so offensive a light as other fiend,-
men but lie thought there was quite enough them to
justify the boon in calling those connected with the
letter to its bar.
The motion was then agreed to.
'lke Marquess of LONDONDERRY again foie, and
said he should now move that the author should be ckted
by name to the bar. He had said by noire, because
when he had thought proper not only to publish his
name but his address, it would be but a loss of time,
and a circuitous course to soaks soy other persons (re-
sponsible. The Noble 3larqaess went on to move—
" That Ruben Menzies do attend the bar of this
house to-morrow se'unight."
Mr. BROUOHAM expressed his concurrence in
Ipropriety of summouing ;hr author, by untie, to
Isar. His giving his name and address was cot tool .
sufficient warrant fur the 11,111. e to proceed its, io
inquisitorial capacity, but would be evidence enough"
faun a presumption against the author isa CourtJustice. He was therefore happy toi;ive the within his
support. . • .
The motion was then agreed to.
ECOTTISU COTTAGE TAX.
hard A. HAMILTON rose to move the repeal of the
tax upon Cottages in Scotland. When lie looked at the
amount of the ten, and the oppressive nature of its
ration, and the seams used in rollecting it, lie thought
the Right Hon. Chancellor of the Excliegmar would no:
oppose his motion. Its amount was 0n37. JAW. awl

. ~ ~
..

--TRF. - . _ _ 3.

.._.. ~...

errreVeseraLie'relrtadt }fie 'Deis% and Window Tax
toed to fr• land, he could not expert
"0 I ritii no: a boon would he refused to Scotland.--
knew that tto• fate of his motion would depend upon
the thinner in which it was received by the Right Hon.
I Chancellor of .the Exchequer; and he was sure if the
Right ilon,, tintlentan knew the grievances to which
this Mx sobfectecl the pour in Scotland, he would never
keep it up tie the lake of a trifling source of revenue.—
He then mnved for leatetto bring in a Rill to exempt all
houses in-Scotland under the annual rent of at. from the
ditty or tax of 4s. W, levied under tho Act of the 111 of
;:eo. 111, enp.161.. • ,
Thed4:HAXCEI44Th of the EXCIIEQI.ER said that
there was no Howse Tax in fivotland, and be supposed
what the Nohfe raid tiltaded to was the smallest Win-
dow Tbi'of 4s. 6•l.lo6istfr In Scotland, and 6s. 6J. in
region/I. The !Dela Hon. tientletnan went into a
statement to slew the comparative pressure of this tax
upon r!,e pnpu!atioa. 'f Acre were -1011 thousand Laid-
tations.in that part of Scotland, I 12,600 of which were
ellarrelluith the u indow taxes of all gradations, leav-
ing 220 tbonsand without any charge at all. He COD-
'ended, tberefore, that where two-thirds of the habits!
!ions ivereexem!ed from thetas, it could hardly be elial
to press with severity upon the class whom-the Noble
Lord wished to relieve.
Mn. *IIICHCROMRY.
•
The Speech of the Right Hon. l:naireaisou of the
EXCREQUaII WOOS here interrupted by the-appearance of
the S'erkeant-at-Arms, to announce that the Messenger
appoin d to deliver the order of thee House to Mr.
Ahereromby, was in waiting.
The Messenger was ordered to he brought toilhellisem
when he was exainined by the SPltalteelle fObISMISCIVIew
Q. What is your name ?—A. Samitei Bpiike. ,acs . 11i
Q. Yon carried the order of tbe:Mluweemo
cromby's House?-A. I did. - ;I‘,. . a ..11
Q. Who did von see:—A. I Few sennint ...I •
Q. What conversation passed hetweiki yomNo4l. I
asked him if his master was at home, as I wanted. see
Itim.•Fle said no. • •
Q. What further conversation passed 2—A. I! oohed
whether he had been at home tonisy. Ho soli liat his
master went ont between twelve and twodalleahi that
lie supposed he was gone out of tutee, aeibe MSS not
expected hack for eight or ten Jays. !lea 7
Q. Did he say where be was gone .2—Aillbssidmike did
not know.
The Messenger was then allowed to tithes •••
The Marquess of LONDONDERRY made ussmitob-
serrations in so low a tone of voice, that we could not
catch their import. After conferring with the Speaker,
the Noble Lord proceeded to say, as we understood, that
an order leaving already been made for thasattnedgmiesit
the Hon. Member, it was net necessary to make an ad-
ditional one; because the lion. Mupber wrstild 610111114 Y
feel it his duty to repair to tbst Honse immediately upon
she receipt of it. • Y
The SPEAKER said, that as the former qtr veil
been made, and they found by the answer to it halt The
Igoe. Member bail left town, nu Akins- order appeared
; necessary than for the Messenger to use lilt possible dili-
gence in taking means to deliver it.
SCOTTISH COTTAGR TAX.
The CHANCECIAR of the EXCHEQUER rammed.
Ile remarked upon the impropriety and injustice which
would attach to the repeal of the Cottage Widllow Tax
in Scotland, while it was continued io England. If there
were any objections to the manner in which it applied
to the poor; or to the mode of its collection, be should be
quite ready during the recess or in the next Session' to
receive ally communication with a view to maws" tiesaa.
Mr. J. P. DRANT sepported the motion, sod observed
upon the hardship of imposing a tax of de. 6d., wpm the
occupier of a house worth only 20s.
The CHANCELLOR of ths EXCOQUER ex-
plained.
Mr. HOIE sapported the repeal of tit tits.
Mr. LOCKHART objected to the priticlpel of pfrlisl
exemptions from taxation.
Lord A. HAMILTON said, that after thenineeldshee-
ner In which he had been met by the Right-Hu. Gent.
opposite, who promised to give the subject his considera-
tion during the recess, he should not press this motion
for the p t.
The motion was then withdrawn.
CURRENCY AND AGRICULTURAL ntsentes.
Mr. WESTERN rose to state that be did not wan to
bring on his resolutions to night. It was, however. his
determination that, before the house separated, these
questions should undergo discussion. At present he
should withdraw his notice, and let it stand for to-mor-
row, with the intention of bringing it on with the first
opportunity.
Mr. HUSKIS.SON suggested that as two motion al-
ready stood for to-morrow. the Hon.ftentlemen had better
fix the earliest open day for his resolutions.
Mr. WESTERN said that in case be was prevented
from briOging it on to-morrow, it might standTbr Tues-
day next.
BREWERS IN SCOTLAND.
Lord A. HAMILTON complained that the Right
Hon. Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Treasury had
failed to apply their attention to the situation of the
B retires.' In Scotland, notwithstanding the appeals which
[sadism) made to them. Something was absolutely ne-
cessary to be dose to enable the brewers to proceed with
their Business without being liable to the informer. He
contended that the Act of*Parliamenh and the !nitrite-

tions of the Treasury Board were at Variance with each
other ; and whether the brewers observed the one or the
oth T. they were liable to a fine of 200.. The Noble
Lord, after some further observations in support of his
argument, moved for leave to bring in a Bill to repeal
that part of the Act of which he complained.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER denied
that the Act in question bad been prodactive of any
practical mischief. The object of it was merely to pre-
vent frauds upon the revenue.—(The Right Hun. Gent.
here proceeded to state the particular mode necessary
to he followed in obedience to the Act. but bespoke in
so lows tone of voice that we could not collect the par.
titulars of his statement.]—He had heard no complaints
from any quarter, except that alluded to by the Noble
Lord. and he conceived that the grievance itself was
merely theoretical and imaginary. He saw no reason
for repealing a legislative provision solely because a
grievance was apprehended, and that too without any
serious foundation for alarm. He could not concur lathe
motion.
- Mr. J. P. GRANT snpported die motion.
Lord A. HAMILTON contended that the grievance
was not imaginary. The Act had never been. and
could he carried into effect t and he therefore law eel
reason for objecting to its repeal.
The motion was then put and negatived without a di.
vision.
The Report on the Irish Insurrection Art was brought
up and agreed to, an . tie Hill was ordered to be read a
third time on Thu rim ay.
Tor Irish Public %Yorks Bill was read a third time
an.l passed.
The Lottery Bill was read a second time. pad sow-
miffed for to-morrow.
The Receiver.tieueral's Bill went again through a
a Committee, The lionse being in a Committee,
Mr. HUME proposed an Amendment to the Clause,
keine the salary of each Receiver-Oeneral. The object
of the Amendment was to limit the amount of the salary
,to GM/Leith, utmost _

11,. SMITH spoke in favour of the Amendment. He
coluplained that the clause had been altered (fixing tie
4 Iwt.riastrairiof the salary at We/. gritliort notice basing
.), eu 6iveto to the &Lemberg. of the Couiwittee.
›-lew

Mr. H I MITI IN said there was not the smallest
fnouil.trion for the complaint of the Hon. Member. Thus
was thefirst day that he had an opportunity to intro.
dace the *object to the house. He bad several titres
endeavoured to press the Biil Jodie great iticoover.lenre
of many Members who supported it. The addi•lortsl
3001. had been proposed contingently to meet the ex.
penceattending the Collector io large districts. The
average world not be too,. than 500/.
Mr. BANK ES proposed to allow 2001. instead of :Phi.
Mr. HUME was ready to accede to that proposiu.•n.
Mr. LUSHINGTON mild not consent to aaupt 16,t
proposal, hecense he was convinced the sum would not
be suflicient ; but he had ao objection to allriw —2O. per
mile travelling expences, and uie guinea pee day.
Ale. It. SMITH moved to make the magnesia of s.
!ounce and salary 500/. instead 6061.
Mr. CALL:RAIFF supported the motion for 21. per
mile, and one guinea per day.
Mr. H.. SMITH then consented to withdraw bit
amendment. - - - - _

A clans', containing the proposition of the Secretarf
bf the Troasury was then agreed to, sad annexed to the
Bill.
The house having resumed. the Report was brought
up, and ordered so be received to-morrow.
The other orders of the day were thee disposed of, and
the bona adjourned at half-past oar.
Pt/Wee.
_..........:.
Aunt Acre—U:stox HALL—Yesterday. Cltsie
ft Oak, of the Lord Melville Straus Packet. which
l'ealli fietween London and Calais: appeared at this
:office, to an information exhibited against Lim' by Mr.
Capper, of the Alien ()Nice,' fur having %relight as
alien to this country, without making i ietern of
being do board, to the officer et eiretesend. Tied tact
was ptweed that Captain Mask he. the' pint/man
to be a foreigner. Mr: Cappee ilei,d the. See,fri-9: Of
State hati•given peremptory ritsiroction' that Ilik4e-
nalty should be enforced. 'The Magistates 'regMehrd
Captain Black in the penalty of 101.` the Whitl; or
which goes to the Mag. •
QUEEN-SQUARE MOS. Woodland, an old sailer,
was charged with robblog.the house of Mr. 'Jahn
Clarke, in Aubrey-street, Pimlico. It appeared that
after thelmoilyget ape yesterday roomier. the pri-
loner got over k Pall at the beck of the premises, en-
termd the kitchen, end stqf ii great timothy, ofwear.
ing apparel. and altaleproperty, with which he rot
clear off The ptiltertYwis nriesed shortly afterwards,
and inquirtei la* le tisitsolibboarlooosi, when it ap-
peared that ihWittisiiiii Was/fend some clothe's' for
sale at an adjateet public-boast. and amongst other
.things stolen was a blackbild. which be also offered 14
sell. He was then folloditli and when taken into
custody, had on a pail oft c Trash ea shout the an•
cies, a pair of trowsers, a ' t. and a•shirt„ all the
property of the proteoeta.
leackbird and other
things stolen were not foond.
The prisoner affected to be desalt when .he emu-
witted the rubbery, and with very vielent languane
declaimed against hie presecitote, who took ad% anta,7e •
of his situation, after having %eight and bled fur his
King and country fell twenty years.
The Magistrate told• him that committing an or:
fence in a state of intoxication contributed to the -ag.
rravation of the crime. He was then cotensilted to
prison.
.. -
We understand thee is manesquenco of the relue.
ties in the 0140 of Mat; Ml. Comma:4 of eh* Itsa-
Biggs Wells Brewery bee determined to make his Ale,
Table Ale, and Table Rae of mods superior quality ifl
will enable him to defy all cem _ What me me-
side: the importance to families ng a b ge
free from the noxious Ingredients mealy employed In
the composition of that necessary article, we armlet
be surprised at the extensive patronage he so 4
eddy enjoys. Such farmers we hops will always
be given to raeritoriona individuals who prefer a sar4i
profit and fair name to the risk of destroying the health
*1 their fellow-creatures by a wicked and unfeeling.cx-
pidity. To satisfy the most fastidious as to the genuine-
oess of his articles. Mr. CIAPMAN makes half-yearly the
following affidavit.
•• RIMIARD CHAPMAN, of Bagalggo Well. BrelnlT, Ale.
Table Ale, and Table Beer Brewer, maketh oath and saim
that his Ate, Tsble Ale, sad Table Beer, are brewed fro.
Malt and Hop only, aid that he never has. aor ever will
permit or suffer any drays or othet Injurious inprediestS to
be used le his brewery. " R. CRANIUM
.• Sworn at the Mandott-Heave In the City of Leaden.
karda26. 19d2, before 110, MAGMAY, Mayor. ••
N.B. Orders executed fee Ready lifooey.—All letters
mast be post-paid, or not reenived.
ADVIRTIORMONT.)--The priecipal difficulties WW'
which the skilful Medical Practitioner has•to 'w eenier.
in preventing or curing the symptom of the Venereal
Disease, ongwates in the absurd coacsalment of theit
real situation, which usually characterises the afflicted
persona, and in the still more absurd reliance which
they too often place upon the boasted efficacy of some
UnrrsasaL SPCCIVIC which is unblushingly recom-
mended by the disinterested investor, for the certain
core of this disease, in all its various stages, ramifica-
tions, and appearances. By the rational and considerate
these travea-raitaxo Remedies, are of coarse never re-
sorted to. But, unfortunately, a very numerous body of
persons, labouring under this disease. have yet to • leers
that the first requisite towards their core is an early or
?Hendon to Practitioners of talent, eisservation, and ex-
perience. To persons of the above description, and to
all those who are acquainted with the sufferings which
such permits eerier,, through neglecting to apply to pro-
per solaces of relief. Dr. Swat, as a labourer in so ar-
' dooms a cause, can only further say, that he is consulted
daily. by persons of both sexes, at his house, 3ii, Dee,
tired, Soho ; and, upon the practical result of his hare-
ledge and experience is prepared to rest his claim to tie•
eentieuance of that patronage and approbation which
be has so long and so largely enjoyed.—Observe the
.umber.-3.3. Dean Street. Soho, is a private Hons., op-
posite Mead's-street ; one end f Dean-street leads into
Gerrard-street, nearly opposite the General Two- any
Post Office. and the ether into Oxford-arse
' gratis to the Poor