The Statesman.
London, England, 1819-06-28 00:00:00

TIIE STA'

a..r.t

1.4 W 157'1,7 LUG A: ?V 'E.

haying in point of fi, sidered 'limpet( to his I
Commissioners, taken the oath tendered him, sod
having answered questions pet to him in certain qua.
lified terms, to the elect of desiring further time be.
fore he fully answered touching his property ; and,
telly, Whether the Prisoner had committed an act
of bankruptcy within the eneyniNg of the Bankrupt
Lars, by lyieg Its prises for two months upon civil
process, duriog se bleb lime he was in costively on
ceimisal process. There were objectively to the form
of the indictment, which would go in eeriest of
judgment, but the main questions wee• these above.
mentioned.
The case on the part of the Pei, was argued
by Mr. Serjeant Contr, and that for the prows.
Hoes by Mr 9.0... rjvant LinSA,NULT.
The inclination of the opinion of the Coat
I seemed to be its feeder Of the Prisoner upon the
first point ; bet the judgment of their Lerilahipi oily
most probably be delivered at the neat Old Bailey
Sessions.
I I At one o'clock the Jokey reset to join their brethren
I lof else other Courts in the Eacheyeer Chamber, to
' bear acumen's In Crown cask.

COURT OF CIikNCERT,. y, hive 'RI.

Tile ArlronWCY-Gontrt IL ADD ItOnot" r JotMOM
• Ann Tut coliectßATlnts or LONDOV.
This qrs....sion come on oa„;„ this day, tool Coos-
eel were startled to atoll, it an two Kt Atend4 first ,
sorss•thror it. proposed wharf would he • omission ;
and 4.0011111,, whether the Aiterery-General was
hum fide a wort, ?
Ms. Tin EY. on behalf of the Plaintiff, contend.
ord, that if the Court were to permit the erection to
go on, it would be • great inonnsene.„ because
the corr.& of the river at that quarter "resold be roe.
&rod more Trish, sod thereby holies and other vow
sets • out.' he tehjecteri to certain destrectioo. lie
had odislavits is his hand which slated, that so vio-
lent ass she cornet in March, ISIS, owing to a
sterns, that all the bargee wear this spot melt hove
been stove, hail it not been for the f ble retreat
afforded by this hay ; awl one barge was lineally
to shuttered, that her neon lost nose thinned
poonde. Mr. Jobnon was In the habit of ezectiog
does from then who end it, having entered into as
eareoment with Mt. Impey, agent of Lard Crow-
n,. An iodictment woo preferred against hies in
ISIS, het dropped. as the work had ceased ; bet in
May, IMO. the Defendant began by palling down
she Till which protected the nod, end by employing
a Tall number of men to 11l ep the boy. Mr. !lodges
thought it hit duty to take edvire, and be come-
gently (led this Information, and obtained She in.
joiscilon. On the arose day be preferred a second in.
dinnent, to which the Defendoets had since pleaded,
F.XClihQunit utletinrot. !vim M.
sad It was sow set dome for trial. It was impossi- Soon after on o'clock the twelve Judges took
ble to soy shether it would be lined at the vanilla their seats, when
Sittings ON, Th.; bet eves if It liwild net, that ' Mr. C. F. WILLIAM', in the case of " The King
would not interfere with the jurisdiction of the Court. v. Frond," spleared on behalf of the Prisoner.—
The nuisance would be irreparable if allowed to pro. i 1
roved, it appeared, was some time since tried 1111011
erred, ea it included • apace of 373 feet logg, and 331 a charge of freedulently obtain* money (for the
in breadth ; sad when it nee was completed, it would ! burial of a dead booty carried ashore on the coast of
be beyond the power easy Court to grant adequate; Devoe), by means of • written order upon the Tres.
damages for tosses which sight thereby be 05.L.5.1 surer of the County, which order purported to have
Innis& As Seiko Atterney.General, be remarked, ; been signed by a Magistrate and other persona as sp.
that this Wog a potato askance, that officer was i pointed to do so, wader the Act for Oat purpose,
es-olfocio a requisite and indispensable party. i and was subsequently found guilty of tke capital
Mr. lions, es the other band, was decidedly of ; charge. The amount of the sem obtained was 31. Ss.
opinion. that the Plaintiffs had totally failed in and Mr. Williams now contended that the order so
whim* at Obit this was a 'silence, or that any , forged was open the face of it a mere nullity. The
possible injury mid result it to from the rabbi.— ii Act of Parliament granting remelovratton for the
Eno after the wharf was erected, there *mild be I burial of each dead bodies as might be call ashore,
80 feel beliefs in well end the loe.water mark, eapres.ly provided—that either the Cherch-wardens
sod 100 feet Winn the wall and the high celrent. or Overseers of tech parish as it might hate drifted
The city a London had, by a gift of the ('rod n, into' -
should sign the certificate of its beoisl—that
be antedated conservators of the river, which they I allin'vit of such fact should be made before a Magi.
bed eseicised for centuries. The Thames, it Wri : stride, who would then give an order upon the Ina.
well known, woe covered with wharfs on each side IS serer of the County for the payment of its amount.
In every part of the city, and if such were nuisances, • ov
4.orte of those necessary acts were proved to low
'grey the city would "meet hue ellened the. to be: been done its the case before them. The Wane of
sootle. The Attorney•Generers nano was Pot 0° s the Churchwarden or Overseer was not affised to
this reel" fur no other Innfwee than to Si!' weight : the instrument, end the Magistrate before whom it
to the application, and to accomplish a Print' Jim' ; purported to be sworn, had no etiaiOnClP okattoever.l
As to the work itself, It wield rather benefit tits's Th" , y's son subsegently paid the money ;1
Merle cometorclol purposes; sod "rely the public , but the Treasurer, immediately on its bring so paid.,
advantage was to be C"Sell" in Pr"sfereace to the admitted himself that no such person as the motion,. 1
Mierlions of watermen, owlets the latter could show , ed. Magistrate vitiated in, the c..nty. TO bring the,
It proscriptive eight to the hay. Under Such circus. ' charge against the Prisoner 'titbits the meaning of thel!
stance', tie should move for the loinction being dim- Act, required Writ he snob, hive so written the in. I
molted. - airoment, as upon the fare of it, to prove it 4 legal
Th. Loan Cwancet.Lon raid, when he "we to , instrument ; but. on she contrary, it iris altogether
Ilse Court forty lour oars ego, it was customary : defector?, and, in point of fart, a riff@ nollity.—
thee ler the Aliorney.Genetal (o attend in preprart. Baron Eyre otteervell, that when an instrument on'
Peree" when his name was on- the record, and to i not on the fare of is a valid instrument, it could net 1
ante whether he would go on with the e'en or not.: be held as a forgery, nor slid such instrument towel
That practice bad been discontinued inn the days ; within the provisions of the 7th Geo. 11. The nee
of Lord Thurlow and Lord Inabborooch; but he S of " the King r. Moffsr," so familiar to their Lord.
etsoulJ now with the Solicitor-Genre to ezernine i ships, completely justified his position ; anti although
the record and see what, as acting for the Crown, ; the case of " the King v. Lockit," might be ci.ed
be ought to do. 11. thought the question 4 a more i against him, he should still contend that it was ma.
series' nature than perhaps might be generally 9"P' I terially distinguishable from the present case. In
posed, end was disposed to deride It whenever the, shot case the instrument was a Bank draft, negocia.
Astorory-Ceotwal mode his report. Ile would ins- ble every where. and mole likely therefore in work
piece the Selkitnr-G'nersl to melte as meet' 'Peal , its irons:oil fraud ; in the present case, the order was
ea possible, and judgment would then I. finally iof a particular nature, not foamed according In the
gives. At present he meat say it rather appeared to I provisions of the Statute; but moo in rho former
his to bee suiwincy. nse, it was still much doubted if the decision were
Tits ettlirCOS Of WALES IV nap unteroot.. i not rather tinged •ith a colour of severity—a se.
Mr. MASTIN, in this case, prayed that his Lord- j eerily. nneer, ranched with a jealous rrgassl for
ship "'ad let it me" over for a few days." HS el. i the illiCfPaie of II commerciil country.
pressed *hope and satisfaction that the difference lot.l Mr. CAlTia replied to the arguments of Mr.
sewn the putties would be amicably adjusted, and C. F. witiime, and contended that the Act under
with • view to that accommodosloo he made the pre- which the Poisoner was convicted, did tout set out
nor a; placation. such specific terms in which the order should be
The Souctsron G issangg bed no objection In the written, as in 'acted,. or take from out of its open.
application for delay; is the contrary, it was his I lion the conduct of the Prisoner. There wore many
with that a postponement should take place. In i cases ins which intt-oments deficient on the face of
fact. Mrs. Foisherbert was prevented from attending; them, were still held to be forgeries ; for instances
this day, in consequence of a very serious accident 1 those of Fosugerald's case, and that of Cade in Se•
which else had met with. II Cowl teach, 771. But under all the ciscum.tances
The 1401110 Cnancrit.oa —Well, than, let the ease ; of the present case, be did not feel himself justified
stood over. ' in etriug the length of sayiosg, that the judgment
At one o'Cloek the Court adjnareed. *Olio the Poisoner should be cossfitmerl, if their
Lordships did not consider that taking the whole of
the instrument and the Prisoner's conduct iogefher,
he had committed • forgery within the meant' of
the 7th of Geo. IL—Judgment deferred.

THE ICING O• HILL, MtNNEat, AND WEBS.
Mr. Webb,contormably to the recommendation of
the iodizes, appeared personally iu Court this stain-
ing, and had the jedgment, previously entered at
site Crown-office, confirmed in his f with a
view to ulterior I rot-feelings *gains' Sir Gregory Os.
borne Pale Turner, for a malmseys protetution and
false imprisonment.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH. Joset6.
Till 11N6 N. MO4IILT WOOLVE.
At the bitting of the Court before Mr. Janicel
8141',
The COMMON SIOJtANT moved, thst the fine of
ten thousand pounds, -which this Defendant was ad.
04041 In pa► lest Terns. be Wrested into the Court
anderetnnd tLis =wings in be
nn of the Lord Mayor and Corporation
.st!ne.
Justice noT sniveled that the motion had
made on the last day the Term, other-
*warned Coensel would hove to so into
" Embolism to make a similar

---
Egum inc LONDON GAZtiITE,Ju Ks 25

[The Gavette contains the appoistesest of Alm.
Maconochio, Esq. so the pt•ces of oue of the Ler& of
the tiessien and also of Jasiiriary, in Scotland, is t►e
farm of D. Dose's, Esq. demised.
Sir Wiiiisos 11.1 e, Bart. is aloe appointed to the
ntrice of his M 'jest t's Advocate for Scotland, in tie
I roost of Aim Macasochlt, Esq.]

:as acroraingtr postponed.
the Crown Paper very dirnosed er,
that of the King v. thr Mayor of
nvoion for a Manitstous
A perent Mayor, ILO Worn to

VG V TAGIL
•etticud at the OW Bailey
fit• Jutttiee BEST, spots
nits; bankreists, for frig•
lefaalt, its not sohrnit.
• the Comasissioaers
)t awarded against

ted for the remi-
tter the Prisoner
.tics of Vas Act,