The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1842-12-09 00:00:00

lovember Mr. Edmund Molyneux was I
Tian, and -Mr. David Hodgson deputy

'man of t

ber of children upon
I 25th of October to the 28th of Novembi

ing return was
books from the

I Church of Englanc
Protestant Dissent(

which, a
By the e

not open wi

r fellow Ch

removed f

hey may r

with its use al

Lttee _ prepare

the co

101, to E

lion now pnrsued

Is they c

)rding to the d

which, if the r

1 to chari

that tt
Comm

;ent reso

urch on

hildren

on unl

'ejudice, by ti

prejudl(

)reposition tom
latter would 1

ruction a

ehicle of

tent with t
in where CI

nder n

ngs and recommendations of tht
3e confirmed.

,nded the mot

Jur. IioDGS
Mr. HORN
question he, thought it his di
with regard to the order of proceedir„
appeared to him that the course purse

ppointed committees for

ing into t

to-make one obs,

pu!pos,

Itianity

ucatior

in that council. It

principles out; but the Education Committee,
tion which they had thought proper to place upo.
, . .

. .
appeared to him to have trenched upon the dut
privilege of the council. (" Hear, hear," from t
atives.)

and cries of " No '
special duty of t

from the co

tinerais,
It was the
cbuncil to
i to take care that it

ry individual member of ih

gu,,ard the prerogative

not abolis

So far as his experienc

any section of its member

went, it was unprecedented for the Education Committee
e upon themselves, as they had in this instance, to
shoiild be conducted.

!dare upon what principles the sc-h(

e simple insertion of the words " subject to the appro-
of the council," by no means justified the committee
ng the step which they had thus taken.

Mr. Alderman EARLE quite agreed with his friend Mr.
Hornby, that this proceeding was irregular, but he was not
surprised at it, as, during the last year, he had seen a great
many irregularities on the part of the Education Committee.
He was glad to find that there was on his side the question
a man who could speak so forcibly and so boldly as Mr.
Hornby. He did not know who had concocted this precious
manifesto; but from the repetition in it of the words "di-
luted" and " dispensed," and so on, he should think that

ome pious druggist must have hat
Mr. nODGSON said, that if Mr.

Hornby wa

Id Mr. Hornhy had spot

Mr. HODGSON said he was,
He believed that the cour.-

bk.

Tvatior

aking to order toa

pursued by t
Lnd thoroughly in orde

ducation Co

ed no new principle whatever ;they merely told the

principles upon which they had been appointed, how those
principles were in operation, how they were acting, and how it
was of the utmost importance that they should be main-
gined ; and they merely offered their reasons in support of
- The • distinctimb therefore, which had been
-v.51 a futile distinction, having no

that vie

The MAYOR asked

Mr. fIORNBY replied in the neg

had any mo-

n order that this proceeding on t
on Committee might not be drawn int(

ative. Be called attention

subject mere

part of the Educ

G. H. LAWRENCE did not go the full lengt
,ion Committee, and he had prepared a mod

mendment.
d that t

YDS bel

Education Corn mi

'own-c►e
WN -CIA

as it was c

remarka

the council that

,t a manifesto to fr

Clerk, if

he were

rt to them

report v

T EducatioO Committe

the resolution of. the Cou
armed," could only be g

:s of the Committe

that the

hick the

Education Committ
Irnit just such error

.t the pr

pported by pre
The MAYOR :

Then v

r as applying to the Conn-
:d of the principles upon

rence t