The Statesman.
London, England, 1819-11-05 00:00:00

DATIL* V. TN* DVSS 011

111001.101110 111. Joao.

CHILD.

i

Mt. Heat stated, that be hod a modes to "mho
lo this nee, bet sodomised's% ihat f 1 'meld *eft the
rooevoirot• of Casa) on the ether side if k were
vovpotted,ltt had as objectless to de.. till &Wedgy,
oft dsy, wit► the ken of the Coot, he would
►ring it es.

M. H AUT said. that Ibis INS • 11114111101110 rowels

the Defend•nt frees recrieirir soy sooty ea etcoeitt
of the Ploistiff, or from ieterfnieg Is may respect
with the masecemeet of her bunions. The Plaintiff
it a widow rosidise ie Souvenetshite, mad Why left
with the seseaseevest of • very large brewery the
wished la tel tame person to act as wet fee bor.—
Her Mother towed the Defendant for • cocain term
of years, at a salary of led. a year, le cousigeence
of the Defeatism slating himself to be peculiarly
shilfol in the managesseet of a brewery. The resell,
however, showed the seeirery, as the betimes bad
weedy Mies raised sign he ism Weill, the hese be.
• lei so forbad that so publicus' email ski it. lie
boa else thrown sway sad gassed le be destroyed a
camber of cast. of beer.'

T. LOBO CHANCILLOS reseed t• pest the te.

jeoctiew esti! Notice had been served oo the party es
the other side. Ho consirkwed himself obliged to do
so froth the circumstance of this beer hosing in we.
ral losnisses been deettoyed moody 1111 moths before
the present applicrtiou was made.

ITV. W. 11110110 N V. ELIZA ANN •[LLCIIOX MID
OTIIIVS.

This very Interpol's cave, which was partly heard
dories the last Sittings of the Covet, was again
breoght forward ibis day.
MI. lIA itT was shoot to state the motion for the
when
Mr. WI:401111LO, Counsel foe the Defearlsota,
begged to wage • preliminary objectiers to the Ili.
dilate en ohirh the matins was founded. His Lord.
ship geoid ter rolled, that on a former orreries he
bad objected to the allidarits becasse they were
sworn in Ireland, without any thing on the face of
them to shisietbat they were sworn in as English caesf;'
mad had declared that he walla sot look at alfidelks
in loch • came as the pelmet, unless the parties mak.,
ins than were so pledged, as in be liable to en as.
*ipotesi of perjury, I. case it shoeld appear that
they had sworn (shady. They did not, however, at
premien come up to what his LerdsMp wished, be
there was set a word said as to the penes bane'
whom they wen swore. Rot, seppositag him to is
a Master in Chancery, In Ireland, as he reproseoled
himself to be, still the aildevits were sot soda as of.
forded rereads for sartiotaiming ea asoignment of
perjury. He admitted, that for metal.' purposes.
such ass pees( of debt, so aidevit swore before a
Master io Chatwery in Ireland bed been admitted is
former instances, althangh Lord Thud*w bad greet
doubts on the subject, and in ass case declined is.
rigging sea an slifidavit sill he bad consulted the
Judges on the subject. He vomited to argue, list
there most be evidloce that the person described as
a Master in Chancery in 'Mud, actually 61Ied that
eitoation; and sine, that ',ideate was wanting, he
objected to the affidavits as inadminible. Besides,
assuming theta to have bees taken before a Master in
Ireland, they were not such as his Lordship had de.
elated they (night to he, and did sot subject :the de.
ponents to any liability, because they contained no
declaration au the pert of the deponeata that they
were !bible to as essignmeat of perjury, if they bad
nut spokes troth.
Asetber Cosner!. whose some we did not know,
followed is sapped of the objection.
Mr. Hon/ said, that If this evidence was not to
be received, he regretted that his Learned Friends
bad not rims earlier to illuminate the Court.
The Loam CIIANCIILLOS said, that if an use was
wanted, which was all the Plaintiff could obtain from
that Court, It was clear these affidavits sere not soli-
eirot. Ti. motion, however, might go on at present,
and he should have an opportanity of talking to the
Jody., ea the subject on Saturday.
Mr. Hans Shoo proceeded to give an outline of
the case, sod read the aildevits of the several per-
use •Itte stated themselves to have been accessory to
the sobstitutise of the child as the daughter of Colossi
sod Mrs. legging. In slower to these, there were
the aidavits of Mrs. Strikes and of Mr. Sewell,
eke meow of the late Coleael Smitten. The latter
only saki, that he h'd no doubt of the leant (Da.
loudest's) being the fOgithaste daughter of Coloael
and Mrs. Sergison, sad that he bed never bused of
any sespicion NI the *object, till this suit was lull.
toted. The affidavit of Mrs. Sergisoo stated, that
she was married to Coloael Sergio,. in 1106, atsd
delivireed of this child la 1907; that Colonel Screws
wit @prised of her pregnancy and bee delivery; that
on their arrival in Eaglead, the child was baptised,
and that there was oat sespieion of any imposition
having bees practised. She then penceeded to p
through the andavits of the other poetics, and denied
the whole of their aesertioae relative to the aubstite.
lion. There was, however, Due peruse which had
referents fla the annuity of 121. paid to Meow Can.
ningliam, which be thought it necessary to read to
the Cavort. She stated is her affidavit that that sem
14 was paid or given by her from molieN of charity, and
in comptlout• with the reticular dying request of
bee first husband that that sore should he paid to her,
if the deponent ever had it is her power to pay it ;
and that it was paid with the cosiest of Colonel
Serglc.n." This statement was nor unimportant, at,
is of the same
the tail, as fir

it M

by coopiring it *Rh °lbw statentoots
taily, el •20::! Ilring het silicate to Lb
•
•••••\