The Statesman.
London, England, 1813-03-18 00:00:00

~I
,~!

-

- 1

dal was blown ; not s single whisper of impropriety
was heard ; cot-the slightest insinuation of calumny
VAS made against the Princess of-Weirs. Theeepat.
rat;on took place. after the lapse of ifteen months,
auxins which period he begged the House to observe
the character her Rossi Highness was sot stripped
pf any por•inn of its origins' purity, sox divested of
any entre of the honour sod Lustre which ,had first
istszll her to the exalted shadiest she was deemed
worthy to fill in this country. There were conse-
quently circumstances of aggravation peculiarly
affecting in her case; for the lissuse could sot
but recollect, that at the time of the separation,
yctung and `distinguishea Priecesk a fortigl!Os
state, afflicting. even to o.private
't destitute . of till:time col-
[Com, and were communicate&
if blood and friendship ;-'•;.
ippiogs of royalty, she had nest
sphere and circle in white
those

, comforts which in pri.,
Imilarly;plpesdp could justly
to owir Vat, ilostitute as
,protectwo, to which she ,con-
in uncloebted right ;—deprtied
friendly advisers and vsenkort,
the kw of bittersou. and

I

..,

.

•,‘

nick opinion to that of men, by their educe-
' tun, their long practice, and their habits of life,
very much his topsider; ; yet In justice to' the ac-
cused, be would venture to state EOM circum-
stances, which would be foetid to possess
weight is their influence upon the public
After the decision made by the four
sioners appointed by the ging to Make
necessary enquiry, •a•sA.... report them,--after
most unequivocal vindication of the innocence of
Princess of Wales, as communicated in their
.Re-
port,—it appeared, that a fresh examination Toot
place into the evidence which had been earepletaly
disregarded and discredited • because it was contra-
' slicted and dbibelievede . The new enquiry aos
forgrditt a Noble. 'reties, who seemed -dodgems to
• give force to that width had been previously deemed
of no validity ; and When the witness said, 66 I never
believed the report, Itesated it as the infamous lie
. of the tidy,' what was the conduct of that Noble ,
• Poison ? That person stilt seemed, by a most sign!. conduct of his wife t satisfy
lohlat manner, to give credit to the report ; he any Court, 'that his wife ought to be punished for
• • eiblek his bead, and appeared to disbelieve the strong her subsequent crimes I But .if the Princess of
"e• twadmony of the witness whom he had called before Wales were guilty of the crime imputed t 9 her by
bac When loch a circumstance, 'coupled 'with Lady Douglas, it was undeniable, Abet by the laws
^-14-Ivetibor means and prtmeedinp, which he should !lust of England the blood of the Princess, of Wales
.silica revive, was ditty considered, he wield ask, did -must have expiated that offence, Yet it appeared,
-i; it not become the noose, as the representatives of that after the examination and the sentence of ac-
people. and as the losers of the Crown, to bring quittal which established , the innocence• of the
'iris=Use to A Was? It was not the Princess of „Princess of Wales, Lady ;:Doughts was deemed a
• Wales alone that was shocked by such proceedings. competent witness,—competent after her testimony
Was DOC& Mama Wales, her natural protector, had been rojected as entihrthy of credit, Lady
shocked? was not the Monarchy, with which they Douglas had been cdtssidered, not only by. a
and their Royal Lain were se intimately connected, Magistrate, M... Coriant,—but she had been treat-
` • stocked ?—were not the best interests of the country ed as such by Lard Eldon, the Chancellor of Eng-
* :'alliatited*? were not the meralify,, the virtues, told the ; land: [Cries ttf liner. han!'s Agar I] Lady Dough"
Aprilty, of the,,people, obailita had said, that the Princess ass pregnant. and was.
•-Tes, they Were all, both iudividually andcollectivety,: delivered of a male child: if to, the Princess of
shocked and 'affected in the deepest and tend•-rest , Walep was in imminent danger ;—if so, the Princess
„points. It wig, he would maintain the assertion Charlotte was involved in danger ;—hotwhet *As still
ever and over *gain, totally impossible that theme- more striking, Lady Douglas herself prrvi, test, and
ter could rest in its present state • it was impossible, offered at n that moment to maintain, a: every risk,
whether the righti and interests of the Crown, of of! the tenth of her deposition. Was it not mast
the suhject, wire considered, that the crisis should j traordiaary, that Leilly Douglas, should have
be &ferret, any longer. If the sentence of acquittal !so long concealed the stibject, matter of her
which had been pronounced, were to be set up as a testimony, and have concealed it with such care, '
bar against that crisis which appeared so absolutely as to- have kept it from the knowledge of her own
neCessary, could it be denied that there were people i husband ? When Sir John Douglas was in passession
who, in opposition to that assertion of
.the dune- of it, he made it known to his Royal Highness the
cence of the Princess or Wales, were at all times ! Prince of Wales, who certainly, with great pro-
ready to shake their heads, and who could not help priety, made a communication of it to his Majesty's
thinking that there was Something it? It was high confidential advisers. The four Commissioners ap-,
time that a thorough scrutiny should be instituted.— pointedto take the subject into their consideration,
It was high time that every circumstance, hint. and were iti every respect fitted to the importance of the
suggestion, should be sifted in every way which hu- ! enquiry. lie readily admitted, that they consti.
man ingenuity could' devise, for the purpose of doing toted a tribunal, than which none could he more ho-
;justice, not to the Princess of Wales only, but to • nourable,—more qualified by their legal knowledge,
all •v ho were implicated in the whole transaction.— and by their acknowledged talents and integrity.
The fact was, and he Stroke in the hearing, and un- They proceeded to examine, and 'terminated t.,,y ad-
der the correction, of many whip were well acquaint- quitting :—yet the very evidence of Bidgood, Lloyd,
ed with that fact, that 'the rumours still prevalent, . and the other witnesses, against enrich they con.
though in direct opposition to the sentence of ac- correct in forming their decision,, was given to the
quittal, were numerous; and what was worse, they I world for the obvious purpose or vilityttig and tra-
were circulated with an appearance of candour which diming the Princess of Wales ! He held in his hand
gave them a weight that sat better felt than it could be [Here Mr. W. prodsc4 a boa k]—a pamphlet *hich
described. This was the mode io which mischief much was expressly stated to be published by authority, end_
more injurious, diffusing, and lasting, would he car- which professed, by the titio,to centaiu an account of
vied into effect, than by attacks, however biotite, the Intestigation and Proceedings that had takett
open, and direct. The conseqattece was obvious, place with respect. to the Plite-ret of IVales. lie•had
mere and could net be avoided. Th.cautiously the himself bought the pamphlet, sad he nod thought
injury was veiled sad abided, the deeper k took proper matt, by what auth.,rity was published it
?
r00t... The result was clear and certain ; and while The answer vseti was, that it was riblished by Royal
the affair rested asit was, was not award% that the Authority • and when he farther asked, now tuatau-
PriacPss of Wales should suffer—should be de. therity had been communicated, he was assured that
• graded—shltdd be sunk and lowered in the esti- it should ae known when :he pri.p*r time -rrived for
enetion of.men, even of the greatest respectability, declaring It. The wordi, '1" by Authority " termed
integrity, and honour ? Whea he cast his eyes the rouuing fitle.of the paalpi,!et, and were allishl on
. backward—when he took a clear and minute review the entside of the house, mitt, the e‘i4essi
of the origin, progress, termination, and revival of of attracting purchasers, and externitle, th,!ctrcelstimi.
the accusation—he was bound to declare to the of evidence ruinous to the chat-sett.r and ho.loui, and.
House, that he had feit it his duty to arrest the far. dangerous to the ..xistence of the •rests sl of Wales,.
I thee progress; as far as he could, of what be con- The deposition of tidy Douki4s anti ;• Jt•lio Doug-
' celled was most; intimately connected with the best las was accampaoled a note of Cue publisher, which
'interests of the monarchy and the people. He had, stated, that the real stare Gi the cas.. was given in their
•in truth, much 'to say upon the subject; but he testimonies : so that the Princess s,f Wales was brought
• would endoavour rather to confine himself to state- beforea new tribunal, upon the very evidence which
meats warranted by facts, than to indulge in the had been discredited by the four Commissioners. Out
4ixprrstion of those feelings and emotions which the of four witnessesexamined,notonewasdeemed worthy
severe and unmerited treatment of the Princess of of credit; and the evidence of Frances Lloyd, in par-1
Vales might call forth and justify. What was the ticelar, was decidedly contradicted by Dr. Mills, as
peculiar situation of the Princess of Wales? What well as by Mr. Edmeades. He could not here help
was the plain and simple narrative of her connection expressing his surprise, that after the experience the
with this country.? 'ln 1795, the Princess of Bruns. four Commissioners had of Frances Lloyd, with •re-
wick was married to the Prince of Wales. She was spect to the crime charged against the Princess,
received-with all the honours and attentions doe to they should afterwards, in another respect, have
bet rank, to her intimate alliance with the Crown, grounded their report on that evidence. In. no-'
and to the high destiny she was in all probability (icing the testimony of Mrs. Lisle, he was anxious
called upon to fill. In 1796, she produced that 'to abstain from all remark and comment which might
Princess, who was at the present moment the • tend to give any personal pain : she was, he believed,
hope of England. After all the attentions so very a lady of respectability, and from her rank and con-
justly courerted upon her,--aftei addresses of ngctions in life, her evidence ought to be received
congratulation had passed, and the, customary ma- with great attention ; but he would put it to the
nifestations of loyal feeling 'were evinced,— House, whether it was not a circumstance of peculiar
a separation from the Prince of Wales took place.— I weight, in favour of the Princess of Wales that Mrs.
It rs,lo. for him, to allttwd., lathe_ mom remote Lisle, who anointed with her from her attire! in this,
manner, to the causes of that- unfortunate topers.. country to the year 1812, had riot found any ground
Von. It was quite sufficient for him-to remark, that h for imputing to her Royal Highness the crime of
when the separation occurred, not a breath of sewn- I which she was accused? Was not 'the evidence of

Mrs. Lisle, on the contrary,
,taken, in. the strictest
sense, against the Princess of Wales, a decisive proof.
of her Royal Highaess's correctness of conduct 3—.
Ile must trouble the House rot a few minutes with
some passages in Mrs. Lisle's evidence, relative to
the Princess and Capt. Maltby. Mrs.'L. could not
say there las any attachment; and she never saw
any kissing bands, &c. lie wished to confine himself
to materiel, points, After the evidence was given, tim-
depositions were taken ; and he was not surprised,
under ail the circumstances, at Mrs. Lisle's pignatutre
rto the deposition ; but be was, he must confess, sue.
prised to find leading . qUestions put to her by MS
Learned Friend, the Lord Chancellor Erskine ;
AuestiOni on which that Noble and Learned Lord,
when an Advocate, would lace expired, sootier, than
'have permitted •to be answered by any witness of
his; •on -a trial in Court of Law. Oae.would
be tempted by the deposition, to think that Mrs..
L. said ali in one breath as it were. tinskuestion in

„f •
;,,

11.

.0.

examination. took the sting eniTrAy out of the depa.
, Lloyd wit proved by Mills and FATTieads'is
evidence to be petjured.' Mrs. 'Usle's deposition woo-
den, away, as to the serious part: of it. As for
Cole and I3idgood, how could he condemn the
Princess on their evidence, seeing that the Cabinet
did not condemn her or what Bidgood
.swore ? --if ,
the second Cabinet thought Itieeiedible, how was it
possible that they could bare entirely acquitted her ?
lie should like to ltear'theie men examined before a.
proper tribunal,—by the Learned Gentleman op.
posite (Garrow) above oil men living. Ile had dwelt
sufficiently on these circumstances ; but he had a word
the year 1802,
or two to say on the condition of the Princess, from
up to the present 'time. She had
suffered under eleveti years' persecution :. if that
were denied, those who could hate proved her guilt,
.had acted criminally towards the country by their
silence. Thus she remained till this day, as de-
scribed- in the production of Mr. Verceval c—Left

the gemination was pot to_ Mrs. L. 'al: Did .Capt.' without protection "against false charges of 'friends
Menby sit nut to the Princess 14,tiiiiner'?" • Yet, in turned enemies,—of servants, who seemed traitors
the deposition, it seemed is U she stated it velun..: and spies,-4-and from the foul conspiracy of social
tariff. Thin Lord Ebkinalniks Mrs. L." whether' and.domestio treason, she could 100 to no security
they ail sat just as;the four Noble Lords sat round for her honour, but to the principle of justice which
, their table with her Mr. W. maarked ' constantly actuated the conduct of his Majesty."—
*as Othilf *Wow pot to Mrs. L.) . said avian! Loss at her disadvantageous 1011140 a. See; cam-

:..

ll
ee
ihepaitesoltunilalcintiuojetimadrarynirsad.un,npoyysesitioactithhaittireticerser.,r
taken soddenly
n
guarding her.
adopted. S.,e
save that courage
ern' oently shown,'
n'
' Uhor, hear',
0 4
i(eas,„
rbtlteiinecrisria:srhaalica *. i
a tlititseitl'itiectil iii:4l:ll:.Plaiedd:usecid.
mien as an °hint
rt
peon
augnrtg•i„ohi:finswdzshilian:djetehsietypNreigege
whether the .especcantingi
efirg_c
ought? Mrs. L's answer ,veasoot like the statement Lord called the
in the . deposition.' Lard • Ellenhotough; Indeed, • her.desire for her daughter's confirmatinn N,s.ds.(4let..
sal& to the Chancellor. I Suppose you'd put it was told-her in answer
Princess
as any married woman." " What' id 'you eter Claratiou on that sebject, ii.ititing, which was sin '
ail& of the Priniess's talking with Capt. Maltby ?" brought forward. •
• was another question; bet these were never auewered, beak in MOO as her residenCe: Sql.ieuitwtead'a then se.
lam..gjh
.we bo4 Doolerelag about them• in the de. parated from het daughter, but did..not make com.
position., Ho seas sorry to be obliged to animadvert ' plaints, as her usual intercourse with her subsisted up
upon the conduct of the four Noble Lords Commis. toe certain period of education,' when her visits were
'Sinners ; bathe should be doing injustice' to the : not restrained, except conformably to certain rules
cause of justice, if-he did not say, that, if the ac. : necessary for her education. From 1802, and during
costal hall been pro!ided with an advocates witnesses I the investigation down to 1810, no restraints were
°
would have been protected, or prevented from an.; laid on, and none, therefore,TomeitainA of. At the
swering many lotertogetylies that were put tarthem, i last period, certain hieta wet* given which were
" The Prince*" . says i.Mr% L, “ is free and ion:" oheyed..Somewhat abruptly,last aqtainn; the Princess
descending."—" That,":ol4 the Chancellor, "is not ?inks informed of farther .restraints. Ile (Mr. W.)
my question."-:--" I.thought,"- says Mrs. L., "that : wished to God thatlord Eldon had the same litter.
the Princess liked to talk with Captain Mashy, ra. t course with her that he onoe luid; but now, instead
ther than with the lAdies." Let'the House recol- of an adviser, he had become the 'teen Messenger of
lect, that there were, and are attached to the Prin- mandates, and the returner of her letters. She had
cess, persons Of high tonaideration ; yet could any once- her_
4r_e_g_adriaerss,..bot -now _there. was a deep
'.ltody doubt that when new society, Which afforded gulf hetweetilier and. Lettliiidea, • which was me.
new topics of conversation,' broke in upon the same. rally iMpassables [hear]. She Could no longer aval
ness—the fatigue of retired and mock royalty..-de. herself of his Los ship's advice, and counsel. The
barred froes•many sources of amosement.yet en.. recent teStrictions haecaused her comptaints.of he-
compensated by even the trappings of her state--eould ins deprived of the onkupleasure aed_solace. left to a
any body doubt, or be • surprised, that the Princ.earlintherittheraifuaTion. - Her letter was returned to
should find something in it agreeable? Yet thit her three times, with the.cold, -rigid, austere reply,
was an imputation -upon her I 'Let Gentlemen bring, that there Were " no commands." He cod I not
to thesr consideration the situation of their own , now lament the publicity given to this business ; fi r
wives, sisters, and daughters. When they left home if the crisis had been delayed much longer, it would
to attend to their poblic oirprivate bushiest, would hate been productive of much greater danger.
they not treat with contempt and score, evi. He had rather been the adviser of the letter objected
deuce such es Vtis, if It was attempted to charge 'l6, Than that such consequences should• bate fol.
criminality upon it? (Hear, hear.) They might be levee& thetrgh hemight haveebjected to the threateo.
disposed to prosecotethe calumniator.: but her Royal ingletteeto the King, advised by Mr, Perccval ; add
Highness slid not stand in the situation of a person he certainly should hate shrunk from the otEnisive
for whom such steps could be taken. He was ashamed" Pablicailan. The Nebleloord had said, that when
of some partsa-of the examination.. It was asked, I the separation took plac., it was known that no
whether she went out with Mr.-Ifirivitiii a whiskey 2 'letter from her Rityal. -Highness would be received
Whether he drove ft ? This warsotnething like the I The Prince. of Wales, believer,' a'' that time, bad
, mode of cross-examination, " Who was- there be: Ino responsible advisers, which 'be• had since he be.
sides Mr. Hood's • servant?" " Was he a man or a i came the head of the Government. He was, at the
boy ?" [A langh.] " How often did she go out so!" . former period, a prit4.‘e Gentleman, under the au.
. Was it fair.play to the Princess to extract answers in' thority of the King, at Guardian of. the Royal Fae
that manner? Then they came to Mr. Chester, who s mily : if any improprint, occurred therein,' the King
wa... stated to be "a pretty yonngslan."-.4.410ugh.] . could interfere by his right, and without any farther
—This was-too ludicrous to be' serious, and yet too I reso, t. Now, that the, Prise,• had become the Ruler,
serioos to be ludicrous. The inference seem* twbevi he Wee wernrived toliene it stidOtrar ant feitheritrl-
that there was a prepossession for him, because he vate arrangement could stand in the wity ' ed.
was handsome. It was asked, " Is he not bind. tion to the Throne, and prevent its being consi e
some?" The answer was, 64 pretty !" All that was ; The objections were not, that there 'was any thing
nauseous had been read ; but he should notice one .in her letter, or in its pra) er, which was improper,
point : the witness was asked, " Do you recollect : or that could not be accorded ; but it was the pub-
the Princess getting up and going out of her room; lication of it that was made the ground of offence.
into another at night, for a light?" Answer, " I do." i What, then,- was the consequence ? A fresh eta-
" Why„:' say two lawyers, 66 did she get up in the : minatiou! On the 12th of Feb. the letter was pub.
night i"—[ Lassgh.]—Yet this was in the deposition; i lished: on the 13th, Mr. Conant sends to Lady Dou.
and the shakers of heads continued to shake, because ; glas. Was the publication of the letter so criminal,
. Mrs. Lisle had deposed so and so. That was not a fair ° as to set on foot a process which.might end in be.
construction of Mrs. L's evidence, if the examinations I beading ,•her i' She stated afterwards, that she was
. were read. 6' I heard 'her Royal Highness say," Ino partyletheptiblication: it seemed evident that her
says the witness, " that she had been ill, and that Ilast letter Wes net without advice. • Did the Right
her eandle.was gone out." Was not the Princess to I non. Gent. (the Speaker) know, that at that time
be in a situation common to every subject of the ! Lady Douglas was again .under examination ? lie
realm ? Tjte public mind must form her shield, and ; believed the Noble Lord. spoke the truth, when he
• her protection. Read the evidence, and say whethei I said, he knew nothing of it: liOw could he remain
,she has not a right to be treated as innocent, till she I a responsible Minister, as Secretary Of State, whew
be proved guilty. Mrs. L.'s testimony giresoin easy, Ihe found out this matter, which had been cone aled
! natural, and probable solution, of this Mysterious from him ? He was the dupe, and not the Minister !
transaction,—[fieadj--Mr. Chester, it seems, , Bet now the Privy. ConnCll advise the continuance
(walked out twiee• with the Princess; and he was of restraints, undera view of alt the circumstance,.
left at Lord Sheffield's. Thee for Captain Moore. •What the Noble Lord had said, allowing the crecl't
He dined there, and *here, it was asked,alid he go of his own memory of his own words,' confirmed his
afterwards ? Why, down stairs : she sent him for a i (Mr. W.'s) inference : it was, that, if there bad been
book. " How long was he in other it ?" :Twenty.; criminality, no intercourse would have ,been per.
minutes. Then it was asked how long he 'stayed ! matted. If; said lie, she had not been so impatient,
the second time. This part 'of the examintitiote.was.' the:reatricliees were only. le have lasted-till theyoung
as mach like an imputation on Mrs. Lisle, as aporr Princeis returned to' town: Why, then, .could not
the-Princess. Well theno the Princess actually made I the prili*s of %des have been told so, and that
Captain Moore, a present of a inter injtstand! Mr*. I the restriction to visiting once a fcrtnight was limit-
b. saw him afterwards, on 'the Princess Charlotte's ' ed. Ito her daughter's residence . at Windmr?—
birth-daywhpu hewsjationylagorothe rest of throllree- for the Mere. publication of a letter, ell the
company. He (WM.) night nottgo to Mi. Law rence, .!prevent herivy punishment was to .be i n dieted,—
and soon to the end oldie chapter in the same manner. I The-Nohle Lord had talked' of party feelings and
He had, he Conceived, done enough in referring to : Viet s, and of the danger of widening family di-
this 6.0 k ; and he dearly taw that the notes of the sensions. ' As far as he (Mr. Whitbread} was con.

vs
606(.4 ; and that was but little in this business—
es far, he twlieved, as those, had gone who had ad.
wised her Royal Highness, they had advised no step
to be taken by her, but with the sincerest desire to
put her into that situation in which she ought to be
placed : they had Advised a dignified suhrnissiou,—to
Which she agreerl,—to, those things which were irre-
mediabie. lie was not ashanwil to avow what he
had suggested. He confessed, that he did feel ex.
tremely delighted at the r. suit of the discussion the
'other night. Ire met a person of rank, to whoa he
stated, that he should recomniend a dignified act of
sabmiiSirt by the Princess of ' Wales, which be
thought might put an end to all this trumpery. Ile
also thought that a proper letter to the Prince Re-
gent miglirebtain a corresponding answer. Could
he be said to be going beyond his duty, if he stated
to the House, the terms, in which he suggested that,
such a letter should be dawn IT, after her repot
and unanimous acquittal*. Mr. W. then read thelettcr

he had suggested, Which in suhstatica stated, that her
Royal Highness once Tore presumed to approach his
Royal Highness the Prince Regent; after the recent
deciarations of her innocence in the House of Com.
mws, mince the interdiction of her intercourie w id) her
daughter : that ahe had received the Report of the
Privy Council from Lord Viscount Sidusootb) and

wi placed. in a state,
person : she was left d
• farts *Lich flowed fror
by the endearments of
stripped of ail the trapp
within ,the limited PO
she mewed, any of the
Tate life, a *woman simi
claim, and was entitled I
&ha was of, die natural
sewed she possessed an
'mons was of those Priem
, to whets slui might 1* t

• •
. _ ..
..
. .No •-•, TESMA N. • ,
. .
---- - - • - -- - •
.. ? . . ,
---..--- • • . • 4 lit -V- ' --1` - , •••• oeiottee '''
r eda- ,as
abie moons, tolgtvgit.. .• • - t . I Stittet to many tesatell Sifeedthee Weed whist. her, for the eteednation
of We
:and the alleviation-diet •, - . •': ' l'a&-.4"1... f'l ..' ' • he" beets Pet to her. s" What T....011414'ef her "edict le the militant pa t*
a. • . • ' 414.... i- '• iit' :- !gees end eeptehi Mantle itt start,. whit, if Pak, Went, sod hovel% of the rIC
D. the ac.. ; eat*, assistance lii setae . • 4., .
.. _ •, _ con;
cream. ' was to relieve her ha the ____ 'PIN ' vtitsi-• tag ttrihnetde yes suppose they tialliet Pe..takeu..by surprise. See her servants ti
d been • 2 Ws end • Ellenhorouglblerllll/114hes. ?rem herr end carried sway to give test
golbel to the her. See - her witboet any defender,
pH /rat ~what was her etas:et? -Whit pert of tt
lie ; .oetriett Of eatuoto *Rd Toiresoek, f - the peried On . '' : -n. the IFltionAlb •tb
Com , . ,
mike ':
4-tier:a rIVIAI.?""1111* - illarbel"ass44l .pre.
I'll'
'lleri 47.11Stirli dritidtleirlig°d•lie. 661:1441iltffillial*"-akelrilire"r•
.ii...theti: 6rbesellrersilleedtfthsritingsoath9;iniliged4rtsolenippobiPnch'rtsnlihbii;ribtfsabe°vrel
after the' 1114intetteine, t „,,_•
Wt. lid ' bPou Then teed &Woe 41 'es a ' her poseession of which the had so emi,
aleiree ofts
attempted. ''l!
, . . 5ibi........04 .
to.
itiet. , mid ark-tie-id -of and . which, he believed, to botgoon,
lon "tires fitaily felted, In --
- iiitegi *pie W WIRA bkinnit we t 1!( the Princess's voided was pre. couscinasnesa -of her own inntAlf.; ' i
vu.,,,pkil ). whia 4.„„4,1 *sleet: , foe a nett etelien—he.pute it to Ito . lirelaii4te,ibt rim itetion
.ij
weptetely . enough .
i contra-, fop on t cot by liming tbs.case;# !i effiltn :41. 4 Iltsgaesek.Stotlyetieve-veeeri: . , on ltbiedlisitissiou. He was told i shat
!tea
RI& le peivute-Hfr-;:wheheist i ..117.mtr4 4—* ' ' /7.eliasbuis
a silt -. t 40.0 Searle* which 64seld at Pherdi Auleteerst knew that esainhatietta were
stress to wmobeitirhassetisalty itY,l3,4oir .4. •11",'. .00t° . L _ . P.lsibtato• . steee44-7 hi...l'lm libarte.- 1 teS,ertelet her lest isetumn.: The Nob
..r......1 . tbe prineeept bat aria le•Cler,, if
~n •',
.) mOie „;hue tinsels's', wee•eql Mr &O&M; liflifdlosiate„ % tiereegfllsidttaki let the cOrisequener i
r 417074; omi'cic;tidetif saientorl ter;_4o)l‘ Atop • sin of find ebethetly, ler she vestion referfed'tii• bee own, of the publivher. sat Said he. The I'd
I tow lie her' mistenduct
,aftersverdi. . What (eland could 'family : "" my daughier,” she ,s
,!says, "lived welt •retipondeJ with the Queen, to whom ill-,
it Noble nib a person hate to rottpiela of the,subseqweet • path . her. ,husbietio!' . To the question again, .ways LteOniniginde4 she young 13.rio.eein
fat signi. conduct of his wife? What could he urge to satisfy whether the. print,seot lited as 'g+ married wnman of her care, respecting the matter, of w