The Statesman.
London, England, 1813-07-17 00:00:00

EAST INDIA HOUSE.

A General Court of Proprietors was held
dar, for the purpose of entering into furti ... coo
sides ations respecting the acceptance or .non.aCcept-
ance of the intended Charter: Some ordinary
liminary. business was gone through, and
of considerable length, signed by nearlk
rectors, was read. This report embraced

staittial review of all the proceedings that
place relatively to the renewal of the Charter,
menting upon thosaAruvisions which the
Director., congitlend Rcinjurious to the geneall

fare of the Company's concerns ; and,
impartiality, dwelling upon those.new
which promised to secure and increase their
in the posiession and preservationl of the I
pire. The Report, having gotie through

various topics, c.oseleded with a, dechtrat.i,
they (the Directors who had signed it)

under all the circumstances of the case, ad
their constituents to declitie acceptizt the Charter
,
nay more, they 'would, posigsafy Oise.Atm.
make a fair trial of it, especially as ft, the
been mach and beneficially nrdified in its
through the Legislature. In coming to that
sion, they bad been catuidernbly intluenced,
iloctiug what would be the sitoetiasr of
thousands who were dependent, more or lets, upot
the commercial and political existence of de Coal-
patty if they decline the Chaster' as it Was now ten.
de red to them (the Director*. For themselves they
could only say, they wart willing to undertake the
labour and responsibility' of executing-the providont
of that Charter, if their constituents were willing
to accept it.
After the reading`ef this Report, which was re-
ceived with much applause by the Proprietors, a pro.
test from J. Bosanquet, Esq. against the sentiments
contained in it, was read, who dissented from the
Report, because he did not think the Bill was found.
ed in justice to the East India Company, or likely to
be productive of benefit to the public in general.—
.Auother paper was then read, signed J. Cotton (one
of the Directors), which stated that hid the Bill
been grounded upon she propositions as originally
framed, he should certainly not have recdmmended
the acceptance of the Charter. But, it had received
so many modifications, and it was so impossible for
the Company, if reinted to a mere commercial
body, to carry on even its commerce with advantage
without the possession of political power, that he
should now strongly advise accepting the terms
offend.

Sir H. INGLIS said, that as it was understood the
discussion of the subject was to be postponed to a
future day, he should not now take up their time
any further than to move, that the document which
had been signed by so large a body of the Directors,
should be printed immediately, and likewise the dis.
sent of Mr. Bosanquet, that the Proprietors might
have time to consider the repective arguments of those
two productions, and coma to a deliberate decision-
on the question. When they met again, he would,
with the permission of the Court, submit a *lotion
to them.

The motion for printing the papers was seconded
and carried.

Mr. LowNoss enquired whether any thing was
Meant seriously to be done in behalf of the marine
officers of the Company, that most deserving body
of r: en. If not, he had.a plan in his pocket which
world accomplish that objeeit without costing the
Proprietor's, one farthing.
The CHAIRMAN replied, that the Court of Directors
had warmly interested themselves on the subject,. nor
did they mean to remit their exertions tilt they had
obtained some relief for those meritorious individuals,
and about which they reere particularly anxious.
Mr. R. JACKSON alluded to the minutes of a con.
saltation held on the 101,h June, between certain of
his Majesty's Ministers and a deputation from that
Court; and contended, that the appropriation clause
was framed in direct opposition to the principle ad-
mitted on the putt of Ministers at that interview. It
was then agreed, that the whole territorial surplus
revenue should be applicable to the discharge of the
dividends, white, in the Bill, it appeared that it was
now narrowetrdown to the surplus of a single year.
He could wish that the f3lll, in its progress through
the Lords, might be altered so as to embrace the plan
admitted by Ministers in the conversation altuled to;
and thought nothing more was necessary to induce
them to make that alteration, than to exhibit the do.
eument in question. •
Mr. C. GstiNT wished to state, in explanation of
what had fallen from the last speaker, that at the
time of that conference, no specific security for the
payment of the dividend had been proposed; since'
that period, however, a specific security hod been de-
vised, and the commercial funds were not made liable
to territorial demands till the dividend was satisfied.
It had been stated to 'Ministers as an act of injustice,
that when the commercial character was Separated
from the political, to make the funds of the former
liable to demands from the latter ; and that statement.
had opened up a series of enactments, the object ofl
which was to provide an absolute security for the
payment of the individuals, as long as the coiamercial,
funds shall be adequate thereto.
?dr. Lowman said, he had a plan in his pocket,
which he meant to propose at the next sweet'ankt#
creating a redemption fund, in order to pay, Orate
India debt. He was also ashamed to see those two
empty niches in the Court. Why were they not
fillwi s% ith the statues of Lord Wellesley and his im-,
mortal brother both of whom had done such essen-
tial service to India ? They were the greatt4t bene-
factors India ever had. If they had not been sent
there, the Company would not no* possess a foot of
land there. He meant to move; on a fiture day,
that two noble statues of the noble brothers Should
be placed in'the vacant niches.—Laughter.]
Mr. Wean praised the zeal, diligence, and talent
displayed by the Court of Directors in their negocia-
tion Kith Government, andaaid that Whetter terms
for the renewal of the Charter had not been obtain-
ed, it was owing to no fault of theirs. They would
have obtained better, if better could have been
huh-11/ear, hear
ihe Court then adjourned till neat Wen].

wishes)
Vapei; but, by some strangnfatiliti which I cannot
account for, he has not noticed my correction. I
am fir from imputing this circumstauceto a sentiment
of indifference to the great CUM a Truth and Pub-
lic Justice ; for I can never suppose such a sentiment
in one who considers himself as the victim of injus-
tice, and who has, even since his imprisonment,, as-
serted the truth of that, which alone constituted his
offence : neither can I entertain the supposition, that
ea well-informed a person as the Editor of the Pa-
per in question, can be ignorant of the duty incum-
bent upon a Journalist to afford the means of cor-
recting any doctrines prejuaiciid. to the public inte-
rest, of which be may bate been unconsciously the
disseminator.

The personal security bf an Englishman, after
, having been exposed to great and shameful violation
in the reign of King Jotet, was, as I hope, for
ever established by that clause in the Great Charter,
where the King promises not to " pass upon any
one, but by. the lawful judgment of. his Peers, or the
. law of the land :"—but this security would vanish
at once, if the king could nominate a jury of 12
. • •
men to try a Commoner, or commission any number
! of Peers, short of the whole Hduse, to pass upon a
1
i Nobleman. Here we are told of something far worse
1.-.-of a tribunal composed of four Commissioners
1.
only, eominated by the King, 114 without eten the
• power, as is pretended, of administering an oath.
The mind recoils with horror at the contemplatioti
Of sack an object ; for the reflection immediately oc-
curs, .That if such a monster as this 'really exists,
there can be no safety for any one in this land, so
long boasted for its freedom and independence. Now,
although this monster of the imagination may not
, be so horrible as he is represented, yet will I by
ino means venture to pronounce him quite innocu-
ous; especially when I consider, that the most art-
ful means of establishing any very great oppression,
is to accustom the people to the, idea of it before
ihand. That this idea is abroad, we know; and if
t the people are found to endure it, what is now but
exaggeration, may become reality. The Citizens of
.!.
Westminster have taken `fie 'glum ; and, in their
Address to the PRINCESS; ipoke of this tribunal, as'
lit has been called, in such terms as would have been
applicable to the High Commission Courts under
i CHARLES I. They speak of it, in short, as of a
1
j Court of Justice erected in violation of the Consti-
tution : now the truth is, that it was no Court of
iJustice, but merely an inquest, or Commission, to en-
; quire into the grounds of the charge, and report the
1 same to his Majesty, who, as Custos Pads, is bound
to keep the kingdom in peace against wrong doers of
all descriptions; but who cannot cause any man to
undergo trial, from his own mere suspicion or opi-
inion. Indeerl it would 'be highly improper that he
should; for, in that case, his inuipicions might be.
I- come the source of grievous oppressions. Men.'
I might be exposed to jeopardy, with respect to their
I lives, as well as to ruin, in regard of expences ; and
for all this, they would have no remedy,. as Sir
i JOHN MAREHAN told EDWAILD IV. ;—for suppose
' this discretion in the KING, and be " were to do
I wrong, the party (said he) could not have his action
against himii." Certainly, it would .he very unfit
that the-Chief Magistrate should be liable to be sued
for damages .incurred in this way ; and yet great
injuries may result from indiscreet prosecu-
tions; not to say a word about false, groundless 4
and malicious charges. But if; PP the one hand, it
-is not fit that the Chief
,Magistr4e. (who must be
supposed to be inclined.to idministet itpartial jug.;
lice, as by his coronationith.he is bound, to do)
should be exposed to pr loos of . the nature here
adverted to ; neither is itt493iitho people, on the
other hand, should recite wrong from the very
means intended to dispens'e justice.. Our law sum
Lex selves debit Remediam, there shall be no
wrong without a remedy. Hove thee does it keep
its promise in this particiter ? It sly, that the
King shall not act, in this instance, front his own I
opinion, but by the advice of some of his Count:H/1
who shall be responsible. for the wrong that May be
done to the subject .under colour, or pretence, of
dispensing justice, Here is the remedy ; and a
wiser one, I think, could not have been devised
by human ingenuity, It is also of high antid

• Thh, has hem be Pere (rioted Craw/Chief Jamier libssiir f
see al:n a Treatise published iu voi, entill. d 46 .411441. Piilsjii
,AffiliC3lll." p. 94.

contained in this constitutional Institution: They
had no good will towasds this, Innocent Lady ; and
they held her up to suspicion, thoogit they .ofd
not dare to idyls, her prosecution& In this they went
beyond their Commission, which was to enquire, and
'report, not to pass judgment, censure, Or condemns.
tion of any kind,, particularly- such as thelitty
had no means of vindicating herself against...&.--
It is under the King's Commission that all justice'
Whatever is administered ; and every Commission is
constitutional that is given for lawful purposes, as
this certainly was.. But if Commissioners exceed the
duties of their office,-we ought not to blame the law,
but (hose who act wider it. The question asked in
the Examine(' newspaper, supposes that: there are
two ways in which the Ministry may primed in cases
of this kind. By one of these modes of proceeding
the party whn preferred the accusation may be pu.
nished for perjury, in case his accusation turned out
to be Aloe and malicious; and by the other he can.
not • and the Commissioners are asked, why they
preferred the latter method, insinuating that it was
purposely done in order to cover the DOUGLASES
with impunity. From whatever source the Dove.
LASES may derive their scandalous impunity, this, at
least, is certain, that it is not to be fathered upon
the Constitution. It is, indeed, a libel upon the
Constitution to suppose that it sanctions such an
election as is here alluded to. It would be a radical
defect, and an indelible disgrace likewise attached to
the Constitution, if it allowed any mode of die.
pensing justice, whereby perjury might be practised
with That It has been so practised cautiot
be doubted ; but it has not been, by a radical -defect
of the law, hut Py the neglect of those whose duty
it was to carry that law into execution ; andd4foi this
we ought to be thankful, because the one Is an evil
much easier corrected than the other.

As to the assertion that this was a tribunal incoma
patent to administer an oath, it is only to be com•
pared in absurdity to the other assertion included in
the same 'query, that these Lords were not Privy
Councillors. The warrant that gave them authority
to enquire, directs that the inquest shall be taken
upon oath ; it also calls these Inquisitors by the
name of Councillors ; and if they had not been Pro-
`ceri Regni before, this very act would have made
lhem such. In. short, this Commission of Inquest
was as much a constitutional Commission as a Co.
.
toner'; Inquest, or that of a Grand IGO.' It was
as necessary a discharge of .the Knfl?s obligation to
keep the peace; and as much in conformity-with the
due course of law as either of -thens--and therefore
perjury,',6lhibited before such It inquest,. is as much
ender the-Cognisant% of the laW as before a Coro-
ner's Jury, or a Grind Jury, all these inquests be.
lug institutions under the same intention, namely,
to prevent innocent people from being.aggrieved, by
being unnecessarily put upon thein trial, as. well as
to prevent the real culprit from evading justice. As
I never transcribe what I write, I cannot be at pre-
'sent exact as to the contents of my Letter to the
Examiner; but the arguments used were to the
above purpose ; and I hope your insertion of this
Letter will tend to clear up this great constitutional
point, with such of his Readers, at least, •as
also be in the habit of perusing your Paper, thol;
it would be more proper if . the same vehicle that dts
tributed the poi.on should be made the conveyaune
of -the antidote.

• f

&c.
TIMOTHY TRU EMATC

Suakingthannhire, July 6, 1813.

• Debet 1/011114 leee4 et ennmoetudioee appenbritax erigere....
ticket judietoni retelling in Itegno facere. et Jtatilitaa per coot.i•
Haut pri ceruai regal owl tenere.
Leger Cdovardi, apud Wilkins, p. 200.

We lately mentioned a horrid murder, by poison,
committed on the body of Robert :mgNein, a
gardener; of Waltham, on Thursday the Ist instant,
by AluhafFountain, his wife, .and G. T
.. Rowell, a
cooper, who lodged at the house of Pountlin.—A
Correspondent, iu detailing thii•iiirrid
thin, says) "several glans had bett'lltOtglifit'of tb
gei rid of this poor unfortunate hosbantidbylas wife
and the lodger. By their ori..n.Coliftsttnyai the,'
first thought of friddenitig him to death-I-tett of
throwing- him into the well, and 'diowning
another method. was tO. shoot hitn—but the one
phich proved beat suitable to their dtabolittl d 1 po-
Sition was to give him t !mitlomA queptiti. of lan.,
denuin.—This appears' by the doctor's evidence,
and verdict of the Corooer's Joryr litre been the
refuse oV.tho catastrophe: Symptoini •of • tiolencb
taw appeared over the body •f .the dectised.--•
impatient at tint seeing the tirst-doie prodbct tit'
deßi red., the. ;odger .yeas disOatched ler% mote"
—fa which it seems it iisa•thought aeceitiet to. add:,
Nowa, :witiCh
,weit dauhtieu inliiet6d *Ws! the us-
Hetint lq ist a ittipified state,. •

,~ i•

. • Ti . OP; Rat -.110,1,1F4t.
WATERS p. TAYLOR. . •
• • •I• CONTEMPT.. . • • - •
This *u a taetioa spade,. by ..Pdrk Bea., oWbehalt
of 1M r: thatato.Tregautet pied Receitter of
the nightii retdrns pf . the Theatre,- for. a order to
commit .TOhn, Townsend, the Police ,tlp the
Fleet Prisen,nfor having with force thug. . Asked
from Mr. Harrison, OnAfie night of the ;let .at tho
Open Hduse, a suet ot twenty pounds 4i-shillings,
part of the Theatre monies, in violation of theiLord
Chancellor's order Af•lnjunction, and fdr constituting
Mr. Harrison as the Receiier. • . • .."7
h s John Townsend ettended ih Court, luring sodo.
of the intended application • „ grid intending to plead
his own cause, although defended by 'Mr. Hert 'and
Mr. R!chards ; but an arrangement was propoted by
the Counsel of Mr, Townsend, sanctioned, Or reeom-
mended by his Lordship, and acceded to blr the Coun-
sel of Mr. Harrison, consenting to let the • present
motion stand over and form a feature of the cause,
which, in It few dip, will hare a final hearing, being
now set down in the paper.
•• • • .
Judgment was deferred till the hearing of thsrge.
!feral cause:

--•-• •
WIt.DE V. NONON. •• • " • •••
This was a motion of a novel kind, tailing for an
order upon the Plaintiff, who sues in fqtaso
ris, to gi•.a security for costs, and to-stay praol
in this cause till he pay the costs .f a former action"(
ejectment, in which he failed tot Want of the_M-
fendant's answer to this bill of discovery and relief;
the motion fuither went h) iMpOte 'on the Pfaintift
the hard condition of paying the cots of his unsuc..
cessful suit in the Prerogative Court against the will
of the testator In this causes to whom the Plaintiff
is heir at law, or next of kin, while the proper V la
devised to the -Defendant by the Will, chfirged td
have been obtained under fraudulent circuthatances
pending the weakness or incompetency of ttie.tas-
tidos..

—The motion was strenuouly opposed Oil *admit
grounds, namely, that_the Plaintiff was. a pauper;
that no costs were required of him in the Ecclesiasti-
cal Court ; and that this suit was notstated to be
vexatious; the Plaintiff's Counsel contending, that
this motion ought to be refused with costs, as utterly
unprecedented. - • . .
The Lair, CistitctrAcin warmly anitnadierted
on the nature of this motion, and the ieal that ap-
peared respecting it on both sides at the Bar, respect.,
ing whlch•zeal, he promised it should hare no in.
Suence on his judgment, as he was determined to re-
fuse the motion, 'but without costs on either side.—
His Lerdship obsecved,..that the motion was of very
great importance in a general view, since on such
doctrines next of kin may for ever lose his right,;.‘
and in the Defendant's situation, 0110 may pew.
and withhold the right of another man. No case
was cited, nor could be; to justify the present mo.
tion, as was slid down by Lord Chief Justice de
Gray and Mr. Justice Gould, said his LOrdship, and
dismissed the motion..

*Orskfi norfour
,llse VACR-CHANCILLOIL •
• • KINNERII4.It cr.ARILS.
This interesting gise came before the Court upon
to exception to the Master's Report, which iras very
.ably argued at the Bar on both sides.
The question arose on the last will of the ale.
brated Mr—Gibbon, the historian, vtho died oboe's(
twenty years ago; at lAusanneoiri.Switzerland, cam: •
stituting Lady Elliot .his heiress, es the nearest rill,
tion of his then living, ex pule poterita, antldelled •
to here except certain !rocks to other persona, not.
only his own freeholds,-bet likewise thole he.held
in trust under a friend's will for the penest of others,
if found to be keit* with reverAolt to him eta his
right heirs.
'l'he purchaser of one of the trait mitates tiled
bill against tit* vemierth praying all necessary
.. ...,
PetVel!-'
to be decreed' to join in making out and atecaeksig . •
psi titleto hfmfrom the venders.
Lally Ormond is trustee or executrix 0eiP4,0116;..•
*on, and on a referent* before the Master; !ANC
rte execute the conieyance,, On the grdomi--1-1.
_there was a gentlewoman. Chiming to bit tiVelielresi
of • law.or neat of kin of Mr:Gibbon, but witheisk
living, in that long interval, taken any tiep'toprove
ler'clitith:th Wing any evidehcateriore (he Miter oti
the reference.
The great
circumstat
of ;the duly
to
which he
her Ladyehipi

• This was
&ad/ and

-
"...i.,
.' :t..* • ~.- . ) . . .... .. .
• - • -it t-. . ••• . . •. - .I*. ' 0 ~
-•••• :".
• t •:•\)-kg•-:•..rt,--. • • 1 , . , .
% r• • ••• . .
... . •
• . . THE STA '
-:' " -t--
. - ..
.. . . ....... . „.......,,... ......;....„.......„*.s.,_
• •,... -A. cz..0:44 ... ~=..-.. • . - ,- -,7"t'4°---"=l*•t'''' -- - *---.:47--,-.44..;•:' -
.__ . ___ _ .____ ....... 7.- —_ - ... _ IM _..._____..... ________ .__
' EXAMIAR • NEWSPAPEL ..a1.. "71_••• '‘,:4.44aik '34,' ----
• . q".1741`.. : ' 'itelkii '' I.- may -I es It.': lie 1%7- •- ~ tIOV ilnYiktielikOKl' .:%.0
.., . .
*or ork sattlaidewltssuir-Coestitutim4llllll . • . 4:- ; • , : -.i...46e.-..- s' ' •:' - • :••
• --oillwo, , '.. '', -, ' '
whOefebric. Tho•Seeett lew earl,
•.• • .
held yester. TO THE EDITOR or TAR eThTmesskie....•
~ whil,:altessot be .withdrisen without ruin- tfa,)4lo . .7 ' • 1:001tf Or efutiogßir, iiiii.lirf ••
further cep, gut -In the tseurthW Newspaper, of Sunday,
net govern will, eta& rawereo that If a Itlisg • -' • •• ' .44..1
.4'' • • -.-.--..
.•
. ali*liii4e•l' :.
lillat-VlVAtiCia 7flgoTlltp. . . ~
.1
caa'•-aterPt* Nay. the 30th, an article was Inserted trade the sig- 14(4.
name at Kingi • - . , . • -, --. .- - • 1111011l1LIS .tO.,tOLIVA'S. . 4.•.:-.; .... 1 ff.. ...,
• .
,dinar pre: nature of. Atroscil contataing samsl. licestiw" ie- NO* Atds. would hare been rathor-a hareh-coedition, - • lig
be shill lose the .
1 -r'fl:lteurct. i mated for dinicestas ibt „ 04,
d a rePoqv• specting the Investigation made btto,•theirounds of if this:same, law had not olearlis.dleilttok-svhat was trar,ta issue the order hi him obtained iii ' r
.„,' -a" • tha:6l-: the criminal charge against' the priocoos of WALEs markt by, Orme. retire, •It watt* preserve the good dalri.etilpowering Mr. Morris te. ariploy gawk av
Ki o circuits-
~.. by ..Lords SPENCER, G al"' LIJII- Sbutwhosonon, law,krod approved prawns; to cause right „lodgments' and,contract for all.things 'for opening „title;Thaddre
a had taken', and ERSZ;VE at the command, .and !loader the'
au- to be an
mid justice administered by the advice of without the assent of Mr..Colmanvtlio aterdijpilind
, his.Conncillors*. .Here the. ?eider *ill nite•how paitniner of the conr.etn who ,telOisii.....brAO Any.
tarter, cote-. thorny, ofthe it
...ING:. one of thencinen
lians was) ! justice Is to:be administered Kin ' etn g. hi ' . ' . 14141111/1/14. idilhe
; •not after , the • lig .s. . o .
~ Merits or coestult.to the
to Court ot. tt Why those Noble Lordpiipreferresk the character i awn disettoisp, but bi the advitenot hie.Coomelltors,. .perforirisnres, by which meatts.tl;ii-Onliild ente tillia-f •
genera lwit-,, ite Commissioners, which. prevented •thoit, being a I who, if tiox jive him pernicious adricetare telPeabi-..
inents.atthis.'fheatre were luspended.: . the Leeeee4
v 10404144 rhribirnal competent to sdminister oaths to witnesses, 1 ble for the. wrong they may thelyby,eccasion. Naw, 'Cooosel observed forthetrthat hi ,tvai, shop/lied: to
tetailla‘., li, vto :that of Privy. Councillors, who 'are legal- Magis- I let us apply ,this 'reasoning to the Mai ic • question ; find tile Order .resisted to tbe oinde,.sithnagh sin owe
ieir infereste te • h tv, The words Commissioners,
.. . trite mt or respec . - a charge trfillighly- criminal nature.** Made against opposed his metiqo /Or ft on! the first day.iif the Salty
the Princes* cif.Wasss; the KING, brills oath, was when the order was
.01140,. according to hit tool.
Indlan e • •
11-• Privy Councillors, and legal Magistrates, were bound to keep the peace against Sher' as..Vred as. the 'lectiork- •. . . .....:
•' " •
.. • t: • : 4.t,....••• '
;II all 'those,, , printed in italics. The question supposed that the
-. meanest of his subjects; he could •nOt eseilook the, ----htes HART opposed the order, en the part -of Mr $ . _II
. .
ration, ;twat four Lords were not Privy Counciliers4 wor legal offence, neither could he bring her to trial upon his Colinan, and Mr..Lescri On bland( of Mr..l4.rinitos:.
l could not, 1 magistrates, but only Commissioners, sitting in . a own discretion, for he is to administeiltillice pet clot- apother Defendants rate Part owner,of • die Theatre,
ase, adviOe 1 tribunal not competent to administer oaths to wit- 1 :ilium Procerum Regni mi. He gives a Cotninitsion on the grounds that the titillate' Of the • ordet: werd
the Charter, . . .. . . than - ... to the•fourLords above-Mentioned,- to enquire Into hot given, end not framed according. to bseel'aere.•.
estes:, Thisi Sir, no notion an. which nothing
' thegrounds of thetoenquire forms : *Ming, that they thoold oil. it . charge, upon oath; and ninnies or:, , . . . , . rir-,-..
is° : Atm •to can be moire erroneous, more absurd, And; I conceive :
to report
_to him, whether there wea.any foundation e 4, the giving of -hit,liordship's .ixidguseot lowojemrs;
he Hill, bad, tif may with.propriety add; snore dangeroust• I cou- or oot bar the accusation. Now, suppose them lotif-xterdfotfittlirkearlibg the isiSdaVits that *are bindad ur
its progress "wired it as right and proper to state the great dan- I Lords had said, that there were good grounds for the to ilibti! ',I. : . . .' r . • • ;-.• - iiiiiiii
. . .
.. ,
that concha- ~....
and: the' u i absurdity of di' error le the , charge, when there were none would that notliove ....Theloitti Cwsxcer.r.,ott tottlioli aka ire,
iced, by re- 'l'`',/ • . - .eq. * ...- , - -- 1.-- . • ' •• • • -- - ;
Inven .sespdpelisivr to the puffy • idelliiobsteafielifiely, thiltilheloirlllial Oppoitentttlif :triolfdittiths thilne
11 the Aug, .Prnter °f t.he-Exe,nuer '177151:4"f (11.h°1.' IP- i." --Sel'f"' • '
r teas, ilpon Preheild)
'I, r _.. _ . .k_.•• . ,_.• •t.i,
must be conscious that pa, naa.m good
, : not to coin* themselves in any tech way ; and their meat to the tont:re... •,. "
,f life- Corn. wishes) the very instant drat,l reed the
, . s
~.stialqa his prudence exhibits . also the wisdom and recintio Juti merit was deferral till Mond* neat. ' •
vas nnw tint. 1.1"........: • ism. hl, diner". a f i•-•: n mit fli ill lit V chick !cannot ' A.,...i..i.....1 1.. .IA. ......4:4-6:-...-1 .a....4:6-61 P . M1L...! 4 * g * l' , ' Y

rence. • • • • •
;teat singularity of tVe liattsisted in awl:
,ante, and 4hich hiallorsont much rogretiedt
uly elidence of ptrdliree for kindred of bay
oor with MrAlibboili* (lista 'hhif .
. .
le aisigns as lila 41rottif4111a1 towards
hi the liktioataled.file.Ylo Of -*h., .7
ancestrat and gc*md • ' .•
(
was held.to be seileierh 446,44 Usk
N,
sd the Master's Report Can law&
•