The Statesman.
London, England, 1818-11-21 00:00:00

C
_ •

r

_~._

--
-
U.S.tt was contradicted by the master •' and with re- Mr. ScitaLETT to support Ms role.. The Learned
t, Poen* to Mr. Jones, his affidavit was iiidirct contra: Counsel contended, that the whole object of Mr.
diction to his own deposition before the Coroner's Gurney's address to the Ceort seemed to be rather
Inquest.. It bad been stated when this motion was to vindicate the conduct of Mr. Tooke and. Mr. Yeo-
Inade, that with the exception of Mr. Tooke, there man, than that of the Editor of the Times. ith
• leas not a single witness eaamined before the Coro- respect to the case itself, if the Court could decide I
vet who imputed the slightest blame to Lord ; this question upon affidavits, it-would appear that thei
Churchill in this, unhappy affa r. Now, so fee' affidavits which this young Noblemen had to produce
from that being correct, every .of the witnesses would completely vindicate him from any blamable
before. he Coroner concurred .I‘l imputing blame, conduct in this melancholy. transaction, which he as'
certainly on intentional misconduct, but an impatience deeply and as sincerely lamented as any of the friends
aiod impetunsity, which had they been restraieed of the unfortunate young woman who had lost her
"' by for a quarter of e minute,' those fatal come.: life; but he (Mr. S:) was not instructed to pot the
' quences would never have • happened 'which gave: case open that issue. 'The question was, whether'.
rise to the present enquiry. It appeared that Mr. I Mr. Waiter could be jestffied in publishing the state=
• 'Rieke was driving his" chaise at a very moderate pace I ments in question, which were calculated- to cast
along the road, the road at the spot where the acci-'i the most offensiveand injurious imputations upon the
tient happened not being more than 22 feet in width. character and conduct of Lord Churchill ? From
Th. Noble Lord stated that be. hod called several the affidavits in support of the rule, it appeared that
Owes to Mr. Tooke to make way for his gig, sad 'that Noble Lord had evinced the moat humane sou.
Iftat tfle groom hail also called out for the same par- sideration for the fate of Miss. Shirley—that when
„ • pia ":red that then Mr. Tooke had pulled his horse the accident happened, he had deeeended from his I
laithsietle.-.7.1 movement which, it seemed, had been gig arid afforded every assistance in his power he him. I
fritind great fault with, though, in fact, it was the self
.and bis servant, and that he 'hid given /tie ad.'
' only proper one he could make ender the circum. dress, and expressed his readinesi to attend .the Coe
• stances, he being on his own proper side of-the road. roner's Inquest, if his presence was required:" The
This was corroborated by the testimony of the groom insinuatiou..contained in the second libel was corn.
• himself. It appeared from the concurrent evidence pletely negatived, and the Learned Counsel, after
of several wituesses, that the Noble Lord was at commenting upon the aggravated nature of the libel,
this time driving his horse at a furious rate. Same las well as upon the affidavit, upon the other side)
of them, indeed, only called it an improper rate, submitted that the rule most be made absolute.
but all them imputed blame to him on the occasion. in the course of the.argumeot the COURT suggest",
• It was OA ed that the horse was on a full•trot, and ed, that the Jury might have been warranted in bed.
' that at the time he was attempting to pass Mr. ing a verdict of Manslaughter upon the evidence•
there was another vehicle of the same kind contained in the affidavits stow offered on the part of,
*task to pets et the same moment ;, so that, in fact, the Defendaat ;. but thisseas answered, that the Jury
it vAtsirri_possible for three vehicles safely to pass upon conceiving that there was no criminal misconduct on
' • the road, which, es already stated, was only 22 the part or Lord Churchill, bad found a verdict of
feet in width. To say the least, therefore, of the Accidental Death.
feeble conduct, under such circumstances, The Learned Counsel hating beets heard on both
.. he evinced' a degree of indiscretion and impatience, sides,
'Which showed a distiegard of his own Catty, al Well The Cum? JUSTICE said, that the Court, In die-
' as that of others. Indeed, Mr. Jones himself.charging this rule, would pronounce no opinion upon
said before the Coroner, thtit the Noble Load'i"the merits of the conduct of Lord Churchill on the
horse was on a full trot, and that be thought hie' occasion of this accident ; it certainly appeared in
Lordship had doue wrong. in attemptieg to peas till• his fovea!, that the evening after, and on the fol-
der the circumstances stated. Another Witnesses, lesion day,. he hail conducted himself 'sith mach
who passing along the read,' harispreallid his sp. Jeeling and propriety ; but he could not'seffer a case
prebensinns that en accident would happen hour the like rhir to pass without making this observation,
manner iu niiich hie Lordship was daring: In in: that the driver of a carriage who is following another,
ewer, therefore, to_ the suggestion, that Tobitss'oonht to slAcken his pace, and give reasonable time
' s was the only person who had imputker Mem, to LA fat the caftiage before him to draw out of the road
Churchill, there were three atter witnesses who, and pais.
• even before the Coroner, had-v*444rd their disap- 'lt appeared by.the affidavits on the one side and
probetion of the Noble Lord's conduct. The Learned on the other, that there had been experle statements
. „Cooniel then proceeded to read the supposed libel, published in the Newspapers, 'attributing blar
•' • (es has already been mentioned) was a statement one another. All such publicatiotta the Court'
• bent of the real circumstances of the case, purport. highly improper; but adverting to all the
ing to have been written by a gentleman named Yen. stances of the case, there wag no. ground' made
" man, a friend of Mr. Tooke, in answer to a state. for panting a criminal information against
which had previously appeared in the Morning Walter. But the door of iustipe was not c 1(
llerald, Mr. Yeoman attributing the acc4letit and refusing this rule, if Lord Gitetthiii-should
' the result, to the furious driving bf the Noble Lord. vised to have recourse to tire 'preeeeding by
• The Learned Counsel then proceeded to read the ment; hut although theCtre4theteght this Rut
•T• effidz.vits (in support of his argument, that the slate. to bedischarged, they didsolAlliskileat the
—"'went published in the Times was a correct account of this Papas-did.as esti *vita
She transaction) of Mr. Yeoman and several other Court to discharge it lwith•totwateawMarte dischatod
' persons. The forme- stated I , 'tbat be had attended • causirt/MANVirtar • *

.

.... .

er
' in an adjoining room to that in which the Coroner's
Inquest was held, and that be had conversed with
several persons, eyewitnesses of the accident, who
were unanimous in declaring, that the occurrence had
taken place in consequence of ire furious driving of
' Lord C. Whose cond'uct they said was highly blamable.
—..Tkobffidavit of a Gentleman, who was passing at
tke this of the accidOot with the funeral procession of
the return from the churchyard, also
Stated; that the mischief would- not hare happened,
bettor Lord Churchill's indiscreet driving, and that
• itts tnisfortine wids. Sot have occurred had he
stopped his born for about half a minutes The
•` Learned Counsel read these affidavits in detail, which
amounted to five in number, and he also added the
effieavits of two of the Coroner's Inquest, who
were of opinion that the accident might have been
avoided, had Lord Churchill been more careful. In
answer to she observation, that the Coroner's Jury
• had not found a deodand of the Noble Lord's gig, it
was stated, upon the affidavits, that Mr. Stirling, the
, Coroner, had directed the Jury not to find 'a deo..
Weans! Mr, Tooke might bring an action,
eitiost Lord Chwechill. for the damage his gig had
•reefivtd fall*to the 'ground if a dendsnd
were found: IbsOer these circumstances, theleaarn-
ed Counsel subssitfici, that there was no pretence for
this action, inastSuils as it appeared there was no
misrepresentation of theyansaction, the accuracy of
the statement being,:vouched and 'Confirmed by the
affidavits he-had' read.* With respect to en anony-
.
moos letterwhich bad bean written to Lord Chirckill
in offensive terms of reproach of his conduct, Mr.
• Waiter bad certainly nothing td do with that ;
• nei-
thee Ind Mr. Tooke nor Mr. Yeoman any thing to do
▪ with it • the application, therefore, being completely
answered, he trosted that the Court would discharge
the Rule with costs.
'Mr. SCAALFFT reminded his Learned Friond,.Mr.
Gurney, tbat*there bad been another libel peblifiled
•• in the same Paper, a day or two afterwards, sglinst
Lord Churchill, which required some esplausiwss.
Mr. GURNEY said, that be bad hoped.bis Learned
riend Id not have Animist it necessary to bring

TILE KING tr. TWO • SAOIIOIIIIAIteS .03 TBIL ...
OF *NI EILESa. - -0-
Mr. GURNEY moved•joi 4.reitaltailtisseriel e why
a criminal information not .t. filed against
two Magistrates itttivescoliety of Middlesex, for
misconduCt, ittrkiaingt• from improper motioes, to
license *a publieloole: At present. Ike Learned
Gentleman conceived it would be better not to name
the parties.- •
'rite CHIEF JUSTICE-66 it is al silts better on such
occasions to withhold the names." .
• Mr. 6entleir mold, his appLitetion was made tit
the instance "eaf a Gentleman'of.thensme of Beau-
mont, who walk himself in .the Commission of tl4.
Peace ; and be swore thet-he believed the refusal'of
the Magistrates to license a public-house built on hit
estate, erosiarum private pique against him, in con-.
setieence of bit haviril taken den active pert in espos,
ing abuses in the licensing Apiece, which had .ten-
dered him obnoxious to the against who* he
moved. Mr: Beaumont had, et SitePhertrs Bush, a,
considerable estate, on ,Which many houses wer#l,
built, and he was reqneated, for the convenient, 41
his tenants, to erect h public-house. lie did •
very superior pubtic-hoose, at an eartence of t
thuosanti pounds.; bet every application on the p
of *:slla :tenant tolsiocire a licenie had failed. '
tel
one •tioste tabs Aliso- assigned fur the Vogel I ".
'that 1, - !..• not hou,ea enough—when bows.
were . - ;11*. tires mid there was not a sufficient 1
number:* - habitants, although the Magiorates)i-ci
sensed ii,)i'ltie, much inferior, in the same place.--:i
The retains last advanced, when a respectable man;
' regularly' certified, requested a licence, was, thathAl
certificate was not signed by the Ctergytnan am!'"
Churchwardens, without. which, by Act of Petlial 1
spent, they could not grant the licence. Mr. _esa.) 1
Moot showed them that sfichlignettsie was nut ne-i
cessary, but stilltikty,ief.used,." for erste reasons.— 1
They however, .grlftehediereett;oo4 to -persons
w hose certifica tat were signed*. titti Clergyman
and Churchwardens—andv in fact, the Clergyman of
Hammersmith, in which district the born lay, never
shit If

7

Fret woo. no.. JogL__
the second soplposed libel under contideration.
•: • appeared that that alleged libel was written by Me.
Yeoman, in answer to as. advertisement which -bad
appeared in the Übserver of the preceding Sunday,
and it seemed that the sting complained of was the
supposed iiditfereoce of Lord Churchill to the me-
lancholy fate of the young Lady who had lost her
Me, in taster having made any enquiry about her at
Mr. Tookees house, brit, on the contrary (accord.
lag to a statement which had appeared in the Morn.
iiitlttiarti the preceding day), he bid manifested
liis intiillireaceby attending °tie of Alsnaclea Greed
Balls,
,the vitity iamevvening the accident happened.
Now with iasgect to the latter circumstance it had
• : ,
been stated merely ob the authority of soothe:l- Pa-
per, and hid not been vouched on the authority of
• . the talker of the second 'apposed libel. There was
nothings therefore, of an aggravated nature in that
second peWication.
*Mr. ftosissas wit,proceecling to address the
Court en the same side with Mr. Gurney, but their
Lordships thout it unnecessary to bear Wm, and
tkerautt called upfro

was in the habit of signing. -
The CHIEF JUSTICE said, 'lf Mr. Gurney had
given the usual notice to the Magistrates, he atighti
take his rule.
This not beleg the case, Mr. GURNEY was obliged
to withdraw his motion for the present. • .1
The following are the affidavits on which Mil
GURNEY grounrled his application
The affidavit of George Rands stated, that •he had made seve-
ral anneal applications for a licence to open the bon..e tenanted
by him at Shepherd's Rush, bat had always been rehored. That
having had the signatures nt the Churchwardens and Jiver-
seers, besides all the principal Inhabitants. to the certificate of
his character on former appiteat tie had only lakerrsigna-
tures of the inhabitants ott the last occasion. Rat the Justices
refused the licence, alleging, that the Act of flieliaesetit re-
einired the signature of the Minister and Cherchnardens to tbe.
certificate of his character, whklt he denied, and stated that-
theyi had not required such signatates to offier.cooes. •
' he affidavit of J. T. Kerber Beaumont Esq. dee Magistrate,'
stated, that the Justices had declared to him, that.they refused
the licence because the certificate to character had nut the Mi-
nister and Churchwardens' signatures, as. required by Aet of
Parliament; which be denied being so required by the AM, or
Ito have been required by the said Jostices b Other cases. that
he was ground leattlord-of 70 houses la the village; that enteral
't years ago he war urged to build this bowie" his tempo, for
1 their necessary necomattrOtion. tberM.. being, drat one pshlie-
house iu the village, anted tbat one at. a great distance off : that

. '

_

Stia
TriE

"
.‘•
gko


•
he built the house three years before be was in the Commission
of the Price, at an expeace of nearly 2.0001. ; that seven an.
fatal applications had been made for leave to open the house,
' by respectgble tenants, who had all been refused, on various
grounds—arst, that there were' not new houses enough— then.
when these increased,that they were hot all inhabited, and when
inhabitants were procured, and a licence agreed to be issued, it
was denied on Deponent's house, and granted for a mean thatch-
ed building. standing alone at an inconvenient distance ; and 1
that 3301. was paid to the Vesfry Clerk fur procuring inch li-
eence.
That upon the licence being granted for the thatched
house, the land about it, which had been tottered to he let as
building ground for several years to no purpose, beiame forth—
with taken and covered with houses ; mod that Deponent's land,
which hail been previonsly freely taken, being then desists! the ,
convenience of a public,house. from that time. ceased to be ap-
plied for as building,ground.. Tnat iu the same hour when the
Justices at Hammersmith last refused the licence to his house.
they granted new licenses in favour of Mr. Thompson (a brewer
is the neighbourhood) and others, for two low tippling houses,
which had been suppressed by former Justices as disorderly or
unnecessary. both of which houses were adjoining ol directly
opposite to existing licensed houses, and in the immediate vici-
nity of several others ; and that id neither of the above cases
was a certificate from the Minister produced or enquired for.—
He lastly declared his firm belief that the continued refusal of a-
liceice for his house, so inconsistent with the facility with
which the said Jostices grant licences fur low tippling houses-in
places crowded with such houses, to serve their friends, at use
from a desire to injure him is the fair enjoyment of• his estate,
' in consequence of the ;tart he bad taken during several years
iq
opposing and exposing the errors of their conduct. and of the
present licensing system generally.
The affidavit of William Cotter stated, that he had built
seven good houses in Beaumont-place, Shepherd's Bush ; that
in consequence of the want of a respectable public-house con-
tiguous, he and other tenants of Mr. geanniont penuadeit hint}
to build the public-house which he had done. There was no
public-house within three quarters of a mile of it, on the hue
of Wood-lane, or within a considerable distance em the road to
London, and none near the village which offered a decent
bulging; that there had been upwards of one hundred new
houses built within the last seven years. and iu the whole there
wese six times us 'natty houses now in the village, as
there were thirty or forty years back; but that the amber of
public-bouses (two) remained the same.

COURT OF COMMON-PLEAS. Nov. 20.
DUU -01 NEWCASTLE AND WriffitS D. CLARLIC ASO

OTIIE1;

The Plaintiffs are the Commissioners of &ewerSiCs
Susses; the Defendants are the CoMmissioners of ti.) e
•
Hoboes. The Plaintiffs built a wan Yor draining
and shutting out the tide from covering and *rendering.
useless many adjoining acres of land. 'Chia wall the
Defendants destroyed as pbstructing the navigation
of the harbour. The Plaintiffs brought their action
of trespass in 1817, at Lewes, before the present
Chief Justice end a Special Jury. A preliminary:
objection etas thesis:stated, that the Plaintiffs. having
no property in thwwall, tong not niainialn an action
of trespass. This point was-saved, and the case went
to thi Jury, po the evidence of the facts. The Jury
,found a verdiciwankconsiderable damsges for thii
r Plaintiffs. A ruts 1%0 boen long since obtained to
Vionr.caute why the verdict should not be set ati e;
I,bet the cause Om not beard till no*. It was agreed

heard to-day. They•argued* that the Plairitilis had a
.right of action, as having built the wall in question;
and having authority from an Act el Parliament to
keep in repair. There was no other remedy ; an in.
Aictment would only punish thy offender, but would
not compersate the Wm. It was not necessary in en
action of trespabs, as in 'rover, to prove the right of
property .. it was only necessary in trespass that there
strouldbe.possession. In a case in the King's Bench,
the Commissioners of enclosure sustained an action
of trtepass for a stake planted by their surveyor, and
Tarried away. That they could not maintain the sc-
. tine, as to lend, saes irrelevant to the present ques-
tion, as they had not such rights and powers as the
I Commissioners of Sewers. if the Plaintiffs had not
I a right of scion, none had. The property was en.
I protected, and this could not he said of any property
lin this country. But the 37th of the King, chap.
I I 3U, section IS, entitled them" In cot new sluices or
dams nearer the sea, if they thought h necessary for
sewing nut their waters" They had then at least ir
much right of action as the master (AO ship, 'whose
tight could not be qoestioned. They had exclusive
I>ossessiorr, so far as that stone had a right to go upon
'their works. But It was not necessary that it should
be exclusive ; each of two tenauts in common could
bring an action ; a tenant by setrerance, or his land.
lord, might bring an &cline. As to the second point
„oh was a navigable river, they had • right by the
Act to stop'it. Besides, they were here contending
with wrong.doers, not with owners of the and. They
,were, therefore, clearly entitled to maintain their'
4.liiidri,- otherwise the.eteke casein the Kitts's Bench
ii was vs 'Ong. •
i Cent JrrsTlce.--Airrlthout giving any opinion, IL
I pgtjrne question to My bugbear Copley, which he
I witl'ettameireeri fed Co inawer when he is• heard on
, the sithjeet. “.11 there any instance of Commis.
-sioeers carryini on it pvMic work who maintained en
action of trespeSeht case of Injury, end proved their
possession as the foundation of their action ?"
1 The further bearing was pat' off till Monday.

POLICE.

...,_
STOLEN CHILD,
ita.
• —w-erstrer..-/k letter was received on Friday al the °ace
tem Goodwin, the ens table, who is employed to pursue Charles
Remelt and the child of Mr:Horsley, of Coliohhitry-lane, Is
Unglue, accompanied.by.Mr. Horsley * nephew 4n, itentify the
;child. 'the letter Is dated from Calais, and stated Witt they had
',twined them to that place, and arrived there on Sunday, and
-they had no desist-bat that they bail traced '(roise.' and the
child to have at:rt./riot Calais on the A eclnesday after 'leaflet'
Stole the chiid.'onfl that he had taken his place is a diligence,
and is supposed to he gone to I)tonkirk. ' .
M A RLBOROPGII-11T111115T. Ellen Taylor, charged a youth,
named K'oarlie, with knocking her down in St. Martin's-court,
on Thursday night; wheo ehe 106 t a handkerchief.
The Prosecissaie stated, that in pawing through 'St. Martin's-
court with another female. she was- awoled by the Pri.oner and
two others, strangers to them. The Prisoner knocked her down
isr
Or a bludgeon, and snatched at her whictle. In doing which
ise tort ber dress. She bled profusely from• *lc heed, het she
gave an alrirm, and the Prisoner was secuyed,lty Mr. Neville.
'There yes na.provocation given for this wanton act.
Webb, the coastabletif the night, said. llilhal termie-
Idearissitai is **pitiable state when she wake*,
AlduSe•
'' Thethargfwas for dm assault,. and the MantrehKVisb=
wryer, that the Prisoner was fortunate that a =pita& ellatigescas
iluC ilis44(teesl— lir wits oi deted to bud verykood hail.

COA 1e.14 AK'
Ships at Market. Ships
MI
4 ..... .. 21 ...

- •

__LI

. • • .
- • ,

_.

-• •

. . .

- - -
.... 4
ILL-TREATMENT OF 4 CHILD.•
.....
- - .
Friday afternoon an Inquest was held at the Moaromot
Ilea& Castle street, Leicester-square, on the body of Martha
Puerello, a child about four years and ten ampolis old; sow est
her death under tie following circuutstatuees:—
Jane. the wire of James Street, Nu. S. Whitcombe-street,
Commodore of the India-manse, being sworn, slated. Oho ilia
deceased was put to wino to the wife of Joseph Hill, a tailor,
residing in ileintaittetorow, St. !simian's, for which site was to
receive 4s. per week ; but the child being taken ill. wait can.
veyed home by its tattier on Tuesday week, and died on &today
last. Witaeo attended the child front .the lteh too. to let
15th ; she was regularly an tended by a medital Geutlentaa,aod
believe* she died in consequence of ill-treutnivite 'Fee day
befote the died, she said, " Oh! duo% hurt me—will you not
hurt me ?" Witness did not see her ilt.orealedt. The day she
was laid not, there were three or four black marks upon bee
back, which appeared to have been done byliegers. Who,
she came home, sbe`said she was afraid to tell any thing for fear
her anal would beat her, if she should be sent home agate, and
begged not to be sent bark again.
Mr. S. J. Morgan, 18, Great Ne*portotrect, Surgeons
sworn, said, he was requested to atteod the deceased at her fa-
ther's house, No. 17, Castle-street. He saw her late in Metered
tag. aid found her labouring underan intlauttoattity feserps,;*
a great number of blotches on the skin. produced by the Oh*,
' it. 1 she weal also attended by Mr. Dr Morgan, his Oariner-g•
there was no likelihood of her recovery. but yet tboreSferif .
dome hopes of her total a i thin at few days of her doottvioeed . •
Itelloest was calle.i ter at three o'clock. and None I iipiead
..symptoms had recanted attended with delirious • , , 1..
was done which was deemed proper, hat the 'rain ' tts47l/ el
frond
,ed in some low ty phis, which caused Iser death. . a
1 CORONER—" Chit )00 judge What was most likely to priduest
that.fevt r ?"—A. " Nothing is more likely sham theAlloreate
Intent ; but a• a medical mall, I cannot state. that alleohltety, as
many causes would produce it. The typhus feta kfillaweltirlfif
yirreyaleut, it might come on naturally." . s' 01 e. 4 -
Juryman —" In the course of your attendance, hirdibeehlii re •
toted any thing respecting bet ill trenunent to 3..t0 r'-x. " She
was only four year, old, and the lust.tuur dayardsemastptite isle
sensible. Witness's partner corroborated his ev ideates!, he bare
'Jug shortly after attended. .
Ann Sophia Blunt, wi e of William Blunt. hardware/natl.
12, liranuing's-row, stated, that Mrs 11 ili, aho had the child to .
nurse, lodged in her second door. When site first had the child she
was Li pere et health, sled continued so until about lo weekeugo.
. Wituent met her in Mrin•litil's arms. She asked the . bild how
she was? She replied," Not very we I, Ma'am." Mrs. !Witold,
she mast nave got a cold or worms. as she is cono:antky relavedio
her bowels. 11 §:nese asked Mrs. Hill, whether siteJlhilgiveliher
any physic? She replied, that she had given lier'rhubarb. Mite
ness then recommeoded her to take medical advice, mastic was
ipeor mostly all the medical two in the neighbeetnosid gave ad.
vice gratis. Witness then weal out of towa4 and reined
rut oilt three or four weeks ago, and asked *et *revisal boo the
lodgers were? She untied, " Very well," end dint Alias.
islotted many exilel rims exerci,ed loom the child. .'. bout the
3d inst. Mrs. Hid brought the child down tusked, hearing her
mutter sometbisig, and In a few mirtuteS after-bawd her go.to
the water-closet and empty a slop pail, which she • filled atilt
water. When she laid dune theists.. threw the water tin the iltild,
as she supposed, from the moire the child had made s isiaol tto
child catch her breath Pettily, on which Mrs. !Sol said, " do'nt
cry." Witness instantly. rail Into the passage wheels the water-butt
was, and then saw the child quite naked, and Mrs. itlili is list
act of drawiii4 a secuud pail. W ttoess esclaiiited. " Mrs. We,
you will murder the child.'` Mei. dill answered:'. Maslen, aim
your own family:" Wittier!" said, •• lot Ottawa- do it in
hob e " Mrs. hill again replied, '. Mimi yeae.own tonally,
and dinging another pail of water over the child.. said, •• ilwrc
1 will do it IN INIIVIIAIIt a yin, and again if 1 like." O hate,
called tier husband to prevent is, but she Will sou late, and bit
told her he would erquaiiii her husband when he came home.
-•• are in trie family iil ta .. '

..„.....0 !won.*
_p tile,
.0e dem-ased.yiston t‘ir.,1.,g1im....
crying on Inc ........._ .g before, when sh'was labrlntia
the water-tub. M.*. Hill 1461411 e deceased that ithelet.a4 ~. al . '
full of rats. Site remained in the coal sense sheet so hour.-.
r.. Hill the.i let the deceased out of the eeliar,. and then /plot
her, and took her up stairs, Tat defeated did rot er; dr dr .i.
any thing else to deserve a beating. Ou the same Marron he
deceased said that tits. L.fiji.hasl gives. her rio breakfast • Mrs.
Hill used fre.illealilv to disci' the deceased In water. nearly every
other uoriiiiic; and sirai lIIIIT Niltriliiii she 111411 btu. I.qt up maay
children. and always duetted them in water. The deceased was
s ery 011 in her how els at the time she. war. dloped.,ln the water.
It was since her mistress came honk. that Mrs. fhill hag acted
. with such creek). to ;he deceased. Oa our time, whets the de-
tained soiled die bed, hirs. Hill biought • the deceased down
attars and threw a pan of water stet ker. The temaingte of
this witness's evjdence was its corroboration of the testimony
given by Mrs. Blunt.
Hannah-M. Wood, a lodger in the same house with Mrs !lilt,
.coutirmed the foregoing evidence in most of the panieniars.—
Mrs: it ill is 23 years old, but Geyer had any enildten of her own.
Joryerian.—Did you see Sir,. Hill send Use decrasedirosit the
yard, after she bad taken her out of the water-lab, is senate of
nakedness, and drive her in that state, quite aakedomp stairs,
drippiog with wet ?
11, iciness.—Tea, I did ; I saw the wave on the 'be
was driven up three pair of stairs; I saw she wet
The deceased was_in the water about tea misdate.. ...-L:L,.
Mr. W. Wood, the husband of last Witness, suiiird. ; ibis be
had known the deceased frequently to be kept front Blonds one
day to the fullowius soaraiug winnow food, suit Mackiaws"; her
to be beat iu the most cruel manner for a supseter idea hear ;
' her eties were so load as to be hoard id the stree.ts. • .." '
t The grandfather of thedeceased, .ti Guldens-as of •mairlittreer.
able appearance, requested to be eaumgeelt. Ake . -am
tikw
:Jury thought it unnecessary. He was. however, r ass
!say, that a surgeon had given Ms opinion, Shoe AM libet
1°17t.1610; caused by ate of cruelty. . ....5•*K....1--.. 9. • •-; ---,
orioNett raid, wit it was fur the lir) lofty
. ..
the death of the deceased sat caused by the deliberate creels" l'
of Mrs. 11111. , 'Ehat she had acted with the most. ialmissith se.
verity was eidesit $ indeed, he could not bad eityaamlie foe ' - •a.
butt gross ill.ircatioleut ;it was fur them Hite Jhry) to sayer*. . 1
[her she was guilty of taunter, manslaughter, or whetbosis --.
~
was justified in her coaduct towards the deemed,. .rairillai.:-...
part, he tamer heard such a relatiou of aboatinaolesseirof mi.. 1 1
feeling cruelty ; bat it seas fur be to say..the eatempf her "
guilt. ae„
aillie Jury, after a long enasaltation, retuned appOltiot"!' . .
1111auslauglater aizaiost Charlotte Hil .
t.
The CORONER said, that the panne, if ditrtlinfiglit proper, ./
might indict the Prisoiter for muster. lieletweillits reenlist lo•
fur her committal, and bier was euneeyed.lty-Herlte,,Y,...litratli• ' \
stable, to Tothill.tields prison. -.. .. ,
. . .
n...1i-ft, • ...

--7-701 ED.
Da the 18th inst. Mr. Fr *acts W. Giles, .
maker, aged 24. . .
Ou the ibtli inst. Betsey, the wife of 'Mr, Fatah, Red Lino.
street. Holborn.
• Os the 19th lust. Alexauder Mow', SoiPtaf):Plieli.Plate*
Regent's Park. .
On the 19th inst. at ilammersofth, in hii 996 vkillir.,ViOn
Barr, EN. late Purveyor to kit illejney's lissploalisiverada.
1
- COURSE-Or i* Excumfilk- c. R i -7---Vi4.
.-''?i4.-----
Amslerdata,,, 0.0 8.0 U. Lqiiirs. VII • • i •• . • •
Ditto, at sight, 0 0 (law, 414 .* . ,`' - •
Amsterdam, 11 i C. F. Malta, 5U 1
Ditto, at sight, 11 4 Venice, 25 50 '
,Rutterthun, 11 8 U. Naples, 431
Antwerp, 11 11 et, roO.. Palermo. 140 per on.
Harolitireh. 338 U. 1 L.a..... RC t
Alton, 33 9 U.
Paris, 3 days's bight, ti 66U.
Ditto, 24 15 U.
Hmirdeaux. 24 20 U. ' i
Frank .on theMitine. I.3oeLeagg
Madrid, 4U effective ~,„, •ib :
Cadiz, 40 effective — • '
Billion. 394 t.;,:,.. •,-..„.
Seville, 394 • ~ ,
.....
Gibraltar. 34 •

Vs. Janeiro, .
lain. 91 per Cent.
Cis*. per tem.
Agin of ibe Bank on fralsllLe. -
Postural Gold, is Colo, 41.15.
• per rm.
00111, la Bars, '4l. 91.
New Dollars. bs. sd.
Bars,otautlgras..Cl.

KET, Nov. • •
void. Psite.
Sas. Od an 4&.
..,...3: 114. lei. 44.. td. •

. •
I 141)07V I.,Pftnte.' ria4l.Publisbrd by D. Envied, at All,
SIATE:3I,B2 sarvicE, No. 4, Salsbury cotort,
.
•
•
• 's

the piain;.: ...a.
youWC. lit Vb if Unl WI 4114,110 . 'lr. It 11,11/11111J worn lIC MIME mow,
blame to that the points to be:iirrled were,
fir's, that
Child to be used PO. She awn-vied, '• 1 deity% care!" Site at
clrcum• seiOnil '.
;;' - cud! Rai .obstruction of a natio.,
Other. lanes sand !hr did it to ch:,.a the child. Upon somber
t thought . tiffs Budgie eat to shaitalliiis the action 4:1? rrespasf ;
arca tor site (hart. lii 1) let the coca run met h er, and irfi her
.
itta damp iliac., naked, by way of putosnutetd, nod beat Set
tiery 'severely with a rod, of whirl' stir • betresaiii etrairdays
nade aut gabliiiikiti 6`..t 'ligimktA *!,rid, tbiidly, the non ob=l
dint Mr. :tante rt:— :1; ~
jectiniki.shnuld be folk). wed up for
afteraarcls.. tau the day Mrs. Jfill had. Mutt 410 toe lain of
water over the child. she. drove her ap slam /biked: SW the
slued by the DefendUtzitit%:;!:r isit PliOsstiffs offered to agree to 1
it 8
all aver with a detour( nod cold Wllifet, the 'then
4be ad- new 16113 ertai ibe first objections were witted. d. ,r. and beat bar einleutly • Snow days presio.4,.i.4 hid
y indict- 'DP Defendants lied that the trial Should be in a .."'Ped.._ihP ckil4l
arrumeugr up MAIM, and alPu iPerl. loci' If loPeUaly . . f. '
ele.ofight different county. . tkic,,,aa'refused, sad. cause was Ana Coles, servant to Alis, illaut,depihed, thai ea one Mated
gdieor of therefoee shonov:. 1 .-;
. tag When-her inistrers was. ia •the country, airs: Hiff hr o .kt thft •
• ,,,,.- _ .4.404.6,..« wain, rarreFbrr h4_-_, cvt4irit toy „ii Ii if?
- eats, So rjetistrfilln, VAUGURN.,-.:41110 LOPLEY of the wuter-butt opett the decease., all. ' tan":
Ch:syr. ix/ 4n1.114. for t.petilipt,iiii4....pasum_saiiigliiii4kek , :tereijag tg.c.cao.d. reia Aged il.ltre oAtaohliolAiiiii..sk.l.„..4.
• ~.,.. - ENS, tiLOSEET, ail a TiDDIC for the Defendants.
C tOISITY - Messrs. S.rj ea nts BEST and VAVGIIAN Only were i ift:liatei had not takes) physic at MN title W Wee
&Kited her for toe paryowoof uouicueaikriKki!.e4, ~,,,,
ng mortaing, Mr-, Hill put the der,,eased.pstua tWA.ina...,
cellur, tar cry nig. ? it thn 0t.0en.1i.1,7 betlire, a itteibe: 'NO. 1151:14w