The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-02-21 00:00:00

Mr. S. WORTLEY presented a similar Petition
from Doncaster.
Mr. MUNDY presented a similar Petition from
Occupiers of Land in Derbyshire.
Sir ISAAC COFFIN slid Out farmers were very
loud In their complaints. but oar cause of distress was,
that farmers turned tientlemen, f
and indulged in e
pence ; the best thing to be dune WWI, or the emintry x-
to return to its original habits, and fur Uentlemen far-
leers to resume their frocks.
Mr. C. SMITH assured the Honourable member
who kid just sat down, that be need not be under any
apprehensions respecting the habits of farmers ; their
great 111111.1 increasing distress bad obliged most of
them to resnme the frock, and to deny themselves com-
forts to whirls they had been accustomed.
The several Petitions were read, and ordered to be

IRISH COURT' OF 1.%W.
Mr. C. ORAN f brought in a Bill to regulate the
Civil Proceedings in Courts of Justice in Ireland.—
Urtiered to be read a second time the 2d of March.
TIMBER 'ITIADE.
Mr. DIADSTONE presented a Petition from cer-
t tin Merchants of Liverrool,eugageil in the Timber
Trade with North America, praying that the pr.,-
teeth), Duties might be continued.—Ordered w b..
printed.
Sir E. KNATCHRULL rose to put a tptestion to
Ministers• It was known that an affray of a serious
ratnre too': place aboat tee d.iys ago in the county
of Kent with some smugglers ; two person"; had been
taken into custody on that occasion, and instead of
hiring been examined before the local Magistrates of
the county, those persons had been sent off to Bow-
s!reet by the °Hirers of the Preventive Service. lie
wished to I.now whether these officers in doing so,
•ted nailer the authority of Ministers, and what in-
eructiows were issued to them?
Sir G. CLERK said, that no instructions were
issued to the Officers of the Prey: nave Service, %% WI
respect tb the two individuals who bail been takeu
ir.to citstotly. lint in justice it was but fair to say,
ti•at those indi; idiot's were sent up to London because
it was considered a•course best calculated to answer
the ends of justice,. and nut for the purp'use of throw-
ing any disrespect on the local Magistrates of Kent.
The affray was a most serious one, in which several
Fees bad been lost, and the prisoners had been trans.
mittetl to London in order that the best legal advice
right be at hand.
11C LL poog n %TES SILL.
Mr. S. WOHTLE prvented a Petition against'
ails Bill, from the Inhabitants of nom—Ordered to
Fe on the Table.
FORGERT ON TIM BANK,
Mr. VTR' EN said, that he had understood front
autliorite, that the plan of Mr. Applegate's, the per-
son employed to engrave the new Itank-notes, In order
t prevent future forgeries on the 11 ink hail entirely
f lie was therefore anxious to hear faun au
ilununrahle Member (Mr. Thvies Gilbert), whether
e)e Commissioners hail any plan before theta which
Vag likely to he approved of. If nothing satisfactory
was likely to be accomplished, he w:iitld feel it his
duty to sishtn't a 'autism to the Iluitse sin the subject
oft an early day.
Mr. D. tillaitEßT said, Mr. Applegarth, by means
eta chemical process. width had the elfert of harden-
in!, the heel, runlet multiply the im,,re..ions to an
r 'most indefinite extent, and so far prove the identity
of the notes. But it great r
to every Gentleman.
there was a great deal more than identity
recess•try. Mr. Appletrarth's plan was ther•fore ts •
jecte,l. lie was not really aware whether any thing
1.411 been done for the last three weeks.
Mr. CI:ItiVEN said if something was neespeedily
done, he certainly would feel it hi• duly to bring the
suatur under the tonsioleratiot. of the Ilonse.
Sir ISAAC COFFIN said, that be hail recommend-
ed Mr. Parkins, an Aineriran artist, and felt a natu-
ral interest for the sneers% of that Denticulate% plan. 11
Mr. (ALBERT %Ail, that the plan only differed
fratts cc:union engraving in the instance lie had already
stated. That indeed was a transeem!ant improvement,
Let in other respects his pism pre.ented nothing very
su?erior to common engravings.
Air. IA ITLE ['ON rose to wowe for leave to bring
it a Dill to regulate Chureh Briefs anti the collee-
titm of money thereon. The ohjeet of this Bill was
principally to reduce or to abolish the patent and flat
f^es: anti he would also subunit to the Right Hon.
lientleman (the Chancellor of the Earbeir,r). that
the charges far stamps ought to he altogether re-
n.oved. The liononrable Dentlentan coneluiled by
moving for leave to bring in his Dill, which tas
granted.

ptiuted.

ADMIRALTY FEES.
Sir M. W. RIDLEY moved fur an Areonnt of Ad.
y Fees fur the last ten years, with the up:,ropria•
tinn thereof.--Ordered.
CONVICTIONB FOR FORGFRIVI IN IRE'. %ND.
Mr. U. lIIS. NEC moved for am Account of the
Naulber sof Persons c.oteieteil for forging Batik of Ire-
land Notes fur the last three years, spe.ing the!
number of emit year : and also for an Account of
the Number of Persons % were execntotl in that
eonittry for the same offence, during the cant: period.
'flue Report on the Flax and Cotton Acts, ;vas
hronght op and read.
‘M PETITION.
Mr. DEN NI .t N said, he held a Petition from the Peo.
plc of Nottinghant,prayiug for an intoiry into t
tie late
State
into
..t• the. C.suntry—praying specifically toren Inqy
t':e TfitiloUtiillll4 which took place at Manchester
( llear, hear.)—and also that Articles of Impeachment
u:ight to exhibited against Ministers. In the ate ice
of 31inisters Iw wo.tild not stop to say bow notch he
wzreel in most of the sentiments expressed by the Pe-
titioners-1;e would not say how far their t otishict ap-
pea.r.l 10 him to deserve the Pere re imputation whirls
t:.e Petitioners cast upon them. It was tiece.sary fo:
in to s iv, that stone Members thought that the lan-
ffilitge of the Petition was rather ton strong: for his
tnvn part, began. uo ohjertion to the Petition ; but
thslangnige of the Potition was strong, the state of
distieNs to which the Petitioners were reduced shoot,'
rlea4 for the warinth of their feeling.. It would be
recollected that Nottingham was meationfd as one of
C.ose places in which trade had latterly *velvet"; bat
in one parish in Nottingham the arrears of the Poor
Kates amounted to six thousand pounds—a suns whirls,
ii attempted to be levied. would bring the greater
part of the working people to absolute ruin—sixty
*wants should be issued daily to enforce ttte pay

ascent of s
sach men .
country. ants
pest. as it was only fair to excuse, the warm expres-
sion of their sentiments.
The Petition was tl.en brought up, and read by the
Clerk. It commenced by observing, that the present
were not times for the Petitioners to use the,
laugnage
of adulation, but.. to speak as Englishmen upon the
distresses and wrong.; of their country. They implor-
ed the Dense, as they valued their
you
comfort
tand
security, to attend to the ...laity an n d consf of
their fellow.connt rynien. 'they 'dated, that the great-
est evils had been brought neon the country by the
acts of a corriipt and utif.seling Aditsinistration, antler
whose policy the real glory of England was tarnished,
and her people bent down limier the acts of cruelty
and oppression. The itiott,t of them. Ministers was
" Divide and conquer." They implored the lionee to
institute an impeachment against them for the various
inlttries they hail inflicted on the people, unit for their
base and traitorous conduct agai not their innocent.
high ininde•l, and persecuted Queen. They wished ha
ten ify the peapie by acts of tyrautiy—men were
thon led
to captivity, and his 'wilt to the scaffold wit
twist
c.oise. The pee.ple. sn'tcring ender tlistre,e and
fortune, cried tail for comp!food—theiaints
b were
answered by the Chen Law—by swor il ay
—and diefrareful". of Parliament. The carnage
of the metro. Ai of August, a slay of blood,
which was not acconnted f •r, demanded retributive
justice. They Frayed that the traltoro and noir•lerers
of that day might. he brought to condign punishmenr.
The people on t! at day hat ;lone no wrong—(hea
bear;)--why then shonlol they -ye been butchered
by armed yeiorsatiry, whc• received pnblie than:sit for
their deeds of noir.ler awl of blood, from the ND nioters
of the Pellet. liege at —1 he Petition was ordered to
lie on the Table.
On the qnestian being rut, that the Petition be
printed.
M. C. ItYNNE said, he did not object to the moth"
that the Petition should lie on the Tahle, notwithstand-
ing the eirensiveness of its laneitagi., but he could not
allow an allegation to iro forth to the world, that well
were btottglit ittijoistly to the scaffold. Such a charge
was a gross insult to the public jiietire of the country,
and should not receive circiilation frost' that House.
Mr. U. BENNF.T said, that he did not agree in all
the statements of the Petition., lint he bad no elonlit
that a great portion of them was strictly tree. But be
could not lint strongly ohject to the attempt of getting
rid, by way of a side win'', of the old tight of printing
Petitions. One great ohject acktiowleilged on all !sands
was, that the country should be informed of the proceed-
ings of that Donor, hut the present was an attempt to
prevent the country from being informed. The lion.
Gentleman concluded by flaying, that the right of
having the Petitione of site people printed and cirzulated
was one which he would not conoent to surrender : he
would take the sense of the liokke upon time %abject.
Lord BINNING said he was surprised at the setegger-
ated view which the lion. Member had taken Kith re-
opeet to the printing of this single Petition. The ohl
practice was, that the votes %hoofs' be hid hetue time
Speaker, and if any thing in the P:aition app..ariel tut-
p irliamentary or improper, the Speaker, ;odor his dia.'
cretion, was at liberty to erase it. In his opiiiion, the
House should not be deprived of the right to keep hark
(rota time people matter whirls wsa itOolltittg to the Cha-
racter of England.
Sir itoimaT %'ILSfIN said be diil not rise to Instify
all the allegations in the Petition. fist could it be de-
tiled that nisn were put to death in open violation of the
law—could it be denied els.), that %Blasters refused
to bring the partSes accused of the mueder to justicthee?
Rut Ministers dist snore than that, they recrardell—y
rewarded those persons with a vote of thanks; and the
Magistrates who was accused of haying given the seder
foe attack, received a lucrative place from llinistrrs.
The Petitioners gave Ministers an opportunity, if they
dared, to enter into a jastification of their conduct. It
was a melancholy and ilegracefal fact, that eislottelree
and twenty persons were either killed or maimed on the
With of Angust, and that no enquiry whatever followed.
lie (Sir Robert) was in a Court ;If Law a few slays since
when a Member of that House (Sir F. ilitrilett) bad been
brosight up to receive the juslgnieet of the Court. because
he addressed a Letter to his Conotitstento, under feelings
of 'non, u did honour to his heart. For AU
the lion. Baronet was consigned to a prison : but per-
awls whom he (Sir Robert) wsv prepares. to prove gnilty
of tisurtier—yes, if an opportunity were allowed hint, he
was prepared to prove the far: at the Bar of that 110111%,;
those persons were not only at (Al lilierty,lint were also-
Intely rewarded, and enrosimeeil, as far as impunity coelil
enconrage this tn. to repeat the offence. In the Court to
which be hail allndell, he peeollected the Jtolee to hare
declared that no wroteesausahl he comnsitted in England
wiliont redress. He would wilt the lionoe whether any
redress hill been ever yet afforded to the utterer( of
31arehester ? He hail been for ruontlis attempting to
brine fora rd some itiopl'.ry on this 'Helm-admit. subject,
but he (mind hinsaelf check ul in every piiiiit ; he
tail
it impossible to hring the ssibject before a regulaGr -
bunal. The Gallant General conelinled by saying, that
:since the ;late of the Letter. appr•itine of time cominet of
the Manchester Yeomanry. every act of the Government
required a Bill of indemnity.
Lord C.ISTI.F.REAtiII said, that it was an extra-
ordinary assertion that the Government was hound to
bring persons so justice scrawl of crime. If such
charges could he legally suetaineil, why were nut
steps taken to bring them forward i ;oat if those
els:trees could be sotetained, the I ;Alain General, in-
stead of going down t • that Mike with false insinua-
tions, was bound to bring them forwent in a reptile
shape. For his own part, he ehiried its the part
which he had taken wills respect to that trattsactiuti.
in proenring the sanction of ti-veroment to those
whose lomullde effort 4 on that ocraoion were dictatril
by what they conoillered, and what Ire laelievehd
to he, a Setae of dusty.
s to the v.-sirds of te
petition, there were ocarcely any expresoiuns respect-
ing the Ministers of the I. rown wine!' elsottlil make
him hesitate to receive petitions of the people. (Hear);
bat when the petition spoke of Acts of the Legislature,
sad of the adtniektration of justice, in the tennis
which had bees' era& he thottelit that to receive it
nould be to encourage the pretkru:i •ant spirit out of

--

•
Winn inadvertence OT otherwise, an °b-
on wea laid upon the table, were they
all discussion, and obliged to print
•• ?
Sir 11. WILSON said, lie hail not •asserted any
thing that lie was nut vrepared 'o prove. He charged
the p.trtiea to the transaction of the 16th of August
with weeder, anal lie was.. repaired to take the !Tyson-
sibility of that charge.—(llear.)
Loral CASTLEREAGH said, the Honourable Ge-
neral had better bring the charge before a competeut
Sir M. HIDLEY thonght that if a petition was fit
to b.: laid on the table, it W:111 lit to he printed, and
therefore he slsonhl vote that it be printed ; though he
was ready to admit that he should have voted against
the reception of it, if a question hail been taken on it.
Mr. WYNN could not swear to the proposition that
every petition that was nsceived was tit to he printed,
as there might be petitions presented containing re-
fiections on individuals which it would be highly ins-
proper to genii forth.
Mr. DICKINSON concurred with the Honourable
Baronet, (Slr M. Ridley).
Mr. BATILUIIST expressed an opposite opinion.
Mr. B. WILBRAHAM said, the Alaoiatrates and
Yeomanry of Manchester were, and hail always been,
anxious for iturjry.
Mr. PIIILLIVS said he bad made inquiries reapeet-
ing the transactions of the Itids of .Ittgust, and from
the most careful exarrination, he could find nothing
that could anthorize that violent interference with the
people.—(Hear.) It had heels said is that House and
elsewhere, that the account' of the violence on that
day were exaggerated. lle was sorry to say, that
from his inquiries be was convinced that they were nut
exaggeratell.—liills, had n s doubt been presented to
the Grand Jury against some of the Yeomanry, and
were thrown out. Ile wool'{ not make any reflections
upon that Jury. but he wotthl sae, that if the same
course ball been allowed as to those hills as in
the trial of an itislivislital connected with that
affair, Mc. Hunt, a sol if instead of lasing pre-
seuted to a fir nil Jury of Lanculiire, when
that county wag in a state of the utmost inflammation,
it bad been presented to a Grand Jury of York, the
result wouhi have been very different.--(hear
Mr. S. WORTLEY said, the Honourable General
opposite bad affirmed 'hat he bad a charge of warder
against the lagistrates of Nlanchester. If the lion.
)Etcher hal It, %darn wonia he prove it? It was Isis
duty to pr:ssent bills to the 6rausl Jury over and over
again, till they v. ere foetid, if he had such a charge.
As to the bills which had been presented to the Lan-
caster Grand Jury, they were not for murder. 'lbis
charge of noiriler was, lie wag convinced, brought on
from time to tittle, fur the perposes of inflammations
because if the object really was inquiry, it might have
been attained by au action fur a cutunson assault, when
all the facts might lie bronght in evidence as com-
pletely as uto:n any oth.w charge.
Sir It. WILSON heggial the Honourable Member
its the liist place to recollect the proceedings at Old-
ham, before the Comtism., at which, thongb on account
of the conilit..l of the Coroner, the inquest s
tn ever
formally brunt: lit to us termination, yet the majoity of
the Jury Lad sled:trot that they would have brought
in a verdict of wilful tnnrder.—(lleac, hear') As to
the allegation, that the persons who had suff..red in
the llanchester Massacre noight have brought an ac-
tion fun asaaelt, Ise would ask the Honourable Gentle-
man, if his Lathe% or brother, sir son, had been mar-
dcred on that occasion, whether he should have been
content with an action for assault?
Mr. S. WI MILEY explained.
Mr. 111l0[4:11AM wis sure that they were all an-
xious to have the Petition printed, utile.% :owls a course
was issroosistent with the forms of the !lonic. Ile
understood iliessisi-ction to be founded on that passage
in which the pet;tionars cons;:lainesl of " trimly dis-
graceful Acts of Parliationst, restricting the litoberthat
ties
of the people.“—(t'rie• of •' No, no.' )—Now
expression he slid not lintels subject,
even though that
language were applied directly to the conduct of the
legislature ; lint if the itott,e looked at the coneext,
tisev would hind tit it thin applied not to eisltote, lint to the conduct of Ministers. The hums. and
Learned Gentleman then rsail the olsjectionable parts
of the petition, and showed that, not the justice of the
Cisitrts of Law, lint the conduct of Isis 31ajesty's Ml-
nistera was impugned. As to the Manchester ques-
tiou, he was not diaposed to say tooth at present. u
the slay was approaching when the subject would hr
fully ilisintssed : hat lie meat nose state that he hail
stem ssothing to alter in the !smallest degree the opinion
which he fortnerly exprestse.!. that the proceedings
after the Ifith of August, particularly the pre-
tended judicial proesseslings, hail (lone more than any
other art of our day to shake the confidence of the
pcophs its the impartial aslusinistratiots of jitstice.—
(Ilear, bear.)
Mr. LI'SsIINGTON wished to bring hack the at
of the Meta,• to the question before them,
and referral to what took place in the last session,
who+, after a petition had Iseen received, the motion
for ;wilding it hail liven negatived.
Mr. DWI 'IIII.IM explained.
Mr. W. W explained. The paaaage Ise ob-
jected to was, that in which the petitioners lamented
that when the people railed the cry of they hail
been treated a& tr.sitors, and consigned unjustly to the
scaffold.
Mr. 31.1NSFI ELI) opposed the printing of the
petition.
Mr. DENMAN, in reply, decksresi, that be had not
expressed tiny disapprobation of the petition, and said
that he had stalled attention to it, because some of his
friends to wl he had commitnicated it had expressed
a doubt, not whether the latignage Wall tit to he ad-
mitted, butt whether it svoishl be admitted by that
lions*. What the petition asserted was, that the
people who had raised, the voise of lamentation atol
woe had been met by sword's and bayonets, and had
been ultimately consigned to ignotisistioiss death on the
scaffold. This was strictly true. It waa true that
the people bad been worked tip to co iiiii tit acts. of trio-
hence by distress ; and that, so indamed, they had
been operated upon by spies and informers to acts
Isy which they had !teen led to the seaffniel—{lleac.
hear). This was not to be denied ; it was too well
eatablislied, mad most disgraceful it Was to die doyen).
went and Police of the country.—As to the transac-
tions of the 16th Anglin', it was most extraordinary
that the Ministers should have taken no in iiiii es to
inquireinto those pruc.edings alter they asst voted

thanks to those of whom all they knew atthe
thlpluearttwotallY golial4l splitetil:lll:eou%:beic.retrhe
t,..ptebhDola7tyliheeortf the
(wNierre. people,Btnllsai
when the motion fur inquiry nas brestgl
There never was such an opportunity befave„
the House had fully aVailed itself, of betravii
interests of toe people. The Noble Lord C
tlereagio) hail, however, ott a former swam
them particular facts, which 'ld alit have'
if they had been trite, (for there haul bent
dicial inquiry in this case.) The Noble
Cistiereaglt) had tot.' them, on a former
the earl loads of stapes that were found upon
at Manchester.—(Hear, hear 1.)—and of
trate. who had been trampled under feet '
lion of their duty. la the trial of Mr. Hi
as the Honourable Mentiro. for Yorkshi
them, there hail been an opportunity f
these important facts.—(llear !)—lt was
tertsts of the Magistrates who were the
have proved these facts, yet not the slight
them had hem offered, and the Noble Lord'
remained—a lesson to the Noble Lord how
ex-pnt•te statements which hall not been
the test of a full inquiry. They shoal
sight of this fact, that there was an
proving these facts, and that they had sot
—(Hear !J.—lid should not recede fro
he had made for the printing of the
langnatre might he wrong, but it was
know how the peope felt.
Mr. H. WI LiIItAHANI explained
The AT fORNEY-UENERAL rose,
question was so general that he did not
Upon a division, the numbers were—
For Printing the Petition.
Against it
Majority. .. ...
Mr. J011\80)1'4 CASE,
Mr. 1108110 U SE, adverting to the'
had appeared in the pub:le journals
the refusal of the Secretary for toe ilo
accede to. the Petition, praying that M
was at present a prisoner in Lit:colo
quence of his appearance at the Mem
might be allowed to go and see his aril
a tlyitt; state, in the vicinity of Mani
was now no more; took occasion to
Secretary of State whether the vtatemet
were correct, and if so, upon what grow
Lord at the brad of the oleparttstet
refuse the permission solicited under
circumstances?
Mr. CUV E expressed his readiness
Member any information in his power,
actual knowled.;e whatever of the
ferred to.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL ohset
Johnson could not be legally allowed
Lary of State, or by any usher ant
Manchester, unless the remainder ,
Lop:isonattost were remitted, and m
circumstances of the case it was fru
sileration, that snch a retaiss4
consii•ently gr "'Ted. 'I herefore,
State, who was most humanely disl
abject of Mr. Johnson, was preclud'
his wish to relieve the pris suer under
circumstances.
Mr. lit HillOrSE asked the
what was the term of Mr. Johnson
prisonment which yet remained ?
The AT I OHN EV-ti ES Eli Ai.
cauld not precisely say, but i.e reci
Johnson was c ..... mittett lat‘t year.
SCOTCH CitiUNTY ILKPRES'
Lord ARCHIBALD lIA MIIME
imatelli:itely after Easter he meant
fora aril relative to the state of the
sentation.
CONDI:VT OF THE 811F.UIFF
Mr. CREEV EY lose for the purpose
motion, founded upon a Petition
tit the county of Chester. He until
briefly this :—A meeting of the N'
try, and FrAulders of Chesil:J.':
Sheriff At that meeting an adheres
an amendment was moored and seem
men, Earl tirtssvenor and Limit:re%
was to sugge4 another and a diff
rating the conduct of his Majestl
quiring the restoration of tier Mi
Liturgy. This was the material
two addresses; lint it appeared II
()erasion, took upon himself to sal
dresses was " irrelevant." What
" irrelevant" he (Mr. ('reevey)
Sheriff also took upon himself to
ment of F.arl tirosvenor anti Lord
put at all, and wheat the address, t
Cliolenontieley was again proposed,
low the nettntive to be even put
II -ar, lie•tr ') —This last address
and professed to be that a ,
whereas, these petitioner* atilt
Commons, that if their mayn't
which they rOntersd the elteriC
the majority of the meeting' wool'
I—(llear.)—if these farts wet-
alettv but that Riirl Grosvenor,
nolibernen, gentlemen, and fr.
with thou in this installer, liap
of their undoubted right. 'I hi
'be (Mr. Creevey) was prepared
conduct of the sheriff was illegal
I—(llene.)—ln the year !WO,
House upon one occasion, " tl
bath been, the undoubted rigt
subject, in these kingtlaur".
whether
:hire:lb.:Dbl.:l.i
str.th.
p.er
„tilt:
ocisiant
ii In
gnitt
hrleittitotinitititi.nic
Address was not for Otis very
grievamses?-411ear.)—" And
that all attempts to impugn.
and aetiititot
asy.
s,"(A a
(very nitn:s
$.16
tine present 1.
Sac So nine,' for the pr.
epos the same day, and in
qtranother entry of a ;Win
MIA inhabitants of the City
'net of the ti said Hoag
IABIIIIO, 'Loud cries of hear.

.
1
I

E STATF M N.
that nrrear, lie stated the fact tioliterr that
tics. *hen, ftc
Inouit have felt the deep distrait of their onahal
icctl of
petlti
and that from theta it frit_ S 11 )1t 1..1.7t2t tr In:t rtlree.: taointbeseduer
..• I f I

,tit,t,:p.it.,:tiiaertier.:_jetitniii.i.eta.:i:la
oifitetwlneasiehicjvh.
, Wiihrahmuy, the fo
o.!ght font ar4. P9rt.
ty of ii
iedii3O.l,oel:l3.l,elowrtefuredic,pftp.iatioarrruorn(4ssante,p,pinmilettmhi•filreariiitionsoraeiiitueuti:(eetuniskl7l::l:timeirincgilt.la
~ apofinesettandt.f.tfah,jr:eaoeu.inseepesrraid,nnotrettenhb:saacititiii
officer
chain
siren
re been
Proved,
;shirr could
proof
I how he be yeti
lonia never
tisrootabelev reovt . , •
,t.or tnni ixoeiofiet
• Lord' Claes
Lord's assertions bad 1
satoe
men subjected to IoW 1
tlan
i•ll "Nonfinite 01 toms
alleg
to Petiti- r his
.m. The
dory
as fit they ginna
the 1
I Celli
rend
DM', but the en Ily prof
not speak. lion,
.re—
tlS new
all
IV .-
—OD mot
!.ir.. sr he
he statemeat width mee
Ails wins renown, .., nig'
lo ~e Depurtusestis peat
t Mr. Johnson, the faun
ttillataasiltti
il inoele:f. nb.rlaiaerrssnssiiktutltueecr'irhe'hli;sul Aidede:edliel:'l:: I e ri*:
.4
the
wife, who wit is lit 111
it groom! the Nobk ph
tent thonght ht Is ' Ilia
peatliu Id"
y al
loess to z;ve the Hot (CI
neer, but ha I :topes. .te
afr
the transaction is
~irto
al
, observed, that 4 rho
tilowe.l by the Ser*
authority, to go In by
far
r of his sentence of Fr
I under the peculiar ve)
t felt, epos due cos- Sc
A sion c,,01.1 • sot lit sts:
're. the Secretors of (I
disposva towards tie to
tttleil lawn gratifyiq F.
oiler such melancholy e
li
le Learned Gentle nos !
tott's sentence of irr
I
lla replied, that lit r
e recollected that Mr. I
r. e
lESENTATION.
lON gar.• notice, that 1
ant to hrirg a motion t
lie Scotts County Rep* 1
t
FF OF CIIESIIIIIE. 1
turpone Id' subtoivingi 1
e
Ist front the Freeholders
toileroood the colic ts It I
•Nuldiity, Clergy, l'^'l
.c was curvetted by Or 1
daressecutoled by two lkil"e -I
teassahmitoshol 4
;rear, the effect of algid'
ditf,•rent itildrelm, de?"
esty's Nlinlsters, and rt•
• lajesty's name to Co
ini difference Wowed,
I that the Sheriff on that
•ay, that one of thew ak
'hot vas tt e .fit he thefts
) did not I,now. Dot thr .•
' to say, that the sorol•
Arra Crowe 51t0n14 $0 it
ress, moved Ir; Sir He're
ivosed, he would 064 ll'
I pot upon it.—(erirsi
iress had been palliro94
sf the conntv Of Chrster! 4
affirmed to the Densest f ,
iivtiliturnt had bees rt.
~,iir w,.... i..,„„4..0.9...
‘, 1,1 1,,,.. , rotril for K.
;
Were true. no min cAli
itr, Lord Crewe, and tioot
freelts.l4lers, Or, thooeil
had been illevllydeptlOA
his position being grog°.
'wed to contend dial 'le
illegal and unwarrsetah*
1;$11, it trot voted is tli t
" (hat it i• Dow, sod al"'!'
right and hrivilege a
xlbe
sq, to peti:ion the Ilii
ament<, or for the r.arts•'
A„_
nieaat io he said, dolly,
l'lrs porgos..--lie edresift
nd it *so further Wel
A
:It. or pot tl.oo r„ ot.b wee'•
kli ;14 ct.osorons, toionl:oo`...
Is tls, 11,•bi, b:. the bye.
0`• .T
igli )I—ds a.... abigher
I:itiPetil:riy:ir7tlri.hoe:if:flerital.oir.:::,ltupr::il,eo.] "e.rstafte.'l.l 1141::::11h:psitv:.
!war, lie. r.,l—"arlio 9'
Ma