The Statesman.
London, England, 1814-06-25 00:00:00

the conviction -was erroneously pronounced, and
the nem of the Court below erroneously found.
id, hr hoped he had no deficient sense of that high
hettoor %ouch ought to fasten itself upon the conduct
a a Mewherr fif that House, or that he should not
be backward in visiting that case, if it should be
found to he due to it, with that vote of expulsion

one, prohahly the least implicated,
into Courtt to apply for

'which toes usual in such cases; but be protested
against being bound to come to sock a conclusion
Alsowt the mere clirct-ot the judgment,. without being

a new Matt att.

at shobtain
the rest would be butitled to comae in and .tike tk,
same benefit; but in the event of his'net obtaining-a
wsw trial, those other persons, the melt

present
t *Dori

gnE
Me *bt Corn S>

Owlet verdict on the feet* iefere them. But the
ce4ektuences tlf thit swoeld not apply to Members
but most, open tlie• doors of the Rene

satisfied that that judgment had helm founded on jus-
tilin•ettr tmd—marle—these observations from a pure
sense of what was due to the cue under all itit

though -19 - . . . .
deeply involved in the crime, would have the best • $ all the inferior subjettit ii'the realm. Thej
opportunity afforded • them of eluding the punish. would, have to retry also titiAikews and others in
moot. Tills was the technical rule. h woo with theireitUation.. He should think that nothing
. . -
latlculaf
of' .1

- - .
CUIII,I6IICPS. • He never had' the slightelt ‘pecsonal
no% tedge.okf the Noble Lord ; he never was intro.
choced to him ; ,he time spoke to him; be never was
his Company ; he *poke without any
.ether ingu.
once than that-possibly which the severity of the see-
tence might have excited, but with no disposition to
41void 11111$ oeuclusion to which he might arrive upon
• e careful veview of the case.
„ ;41 r. 1111;0A, DH I);,as he good so committed
on this (*lesion, trusted that he might be allowed
Lo aay a few words. nevould assure the House
that be did not entertain the alighest feeling or die.
• position to orge.the-business in which he had engaged
correspond

VIM
. .
great pleasure, however, be stated, that oo technical, ited to giVe.taimpir wound to the institution
rule, however wisely footled, or however lops. it 1 larks, tban for .theTrouie of Commons to
.take
might have been acted on, was permitted in:a 1 Owl them tb ieevide the testimony on which they
,British Court of Justice .tb Stork • injustice toVrardi : , to their conclusions: With veapect to the notes
any one. .The•Couit would find ;,season for (Vide; ',
.' Lord Ellenborough," they could • not produce the
justice. tt would make technical roles bend whet. on the. House which was. done op the Jury,
they stood In the way of substantial right. Whit ht ''b# the sight of the witnesses; traversing the Court
been the course of proceeding in the recent insmnce: with their eyes and fixing' on .Derenger. . The et.
The Grand Jury had found. a . tree bill'olgainst De felt of the motion• Would• be to.place the House in
Berenger and others for a conspiracy. Titedefeisd- the situation of a Jury, without the sanction Of •an
. ... .
ants could . not _have been compelled• to tat* their. oath. . • .
tiial until the sittings after Term (ten-or tiilvoilays ! . Mr, HORNER, though he egreed with the Hon.
after the period at which he was .tokli the' and Learned Gentleman in the.conclosion which he
but but' - the - the heti ' differed with Mr entirel the

Itat , any *ay should not completely
with the general sentiment. With respect to the
lion. gentleman's Motion,, he 'mold abstain from
Riving rtoy opinion upon it. lie certainly had had it
in contemplation .to submit to the House on Friday
next, w 'notion founded solely on the document
which bad that evening Iwo laid on the table, owl
lie believed that in entertainiug.sach an intention, he-
lm justiked by the usages of .Parliament. If, how-
ever, the lion. Gentlemen desired further informa-
tion, for the purpose either of. satisfying himself of
the.guilt ..of the iudividuals in question, or of in..
deCing the How to think more favourably of those
' tatlliftloals he had not the slightest wish to.throw
•
• t • •
, any.imieedintent in the way.of, the success of his ma.
. Mr. HOLMES offered to read an extract from
Lord Coehrane's letter to him, but the House did
seem disposed to hear it.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL declared, that
be rose on this occasion with very unpleasant sensa.
tions. If consistently with hls duty he could do
any thing to meliorate the situation of the individual
in question, it would afford him a high gratification ;
• but he apprehended that it would be impossible for
him to acceded to the present motion consistently
with his respect for the due administration of the
functions of Parliament, which he could not consent
"should be used for purposes that, however they were
considered, must embarrass their. proceedings, fo.
reign as they were to the legitimate objects which
Parliament ought-always to keep in view. It was im..
possible for him to acquiesce in the motion consistently
with Isis respect for thpt sacred institution—the Trial
Ly Jury. For what' was it proposed to the !louse
to do? To review a conviction by a Jury ! To sit
as a Court of Appeal—tosit as a Court of Error-on
the facts on which a Jury had pronounced a verdict
If it were propqr to do this, ought not•the House
in point of justice to go a step further, to permit
the prosecutor to appear at the Bar and .!amend his
case, and to permit the Defendant to add new eat.
deuce to that which be had adduced iu the Coprt
below ? This, however, at once appeared so ano.
otalows.• so inconvenient, that , the, very mention
of it siemed to alarm the lionourabte Gentlemen.—
' 011 the general merits of the case itself, he would
cautiously abstain from uttering a single syallable ;

for, compelled as he was to resist a proceeding by !that which the nical rules or the Court bad pre.
which it was supposed the situation of the individual I vented him from doing On the preceding day. He
in question would be ameliorated, he was partici:. I reed from a paper, which Was very ably written,
lady anxious at least not to make any observations and which evinced a profound knowledge of the law,
'which might be prejudicial to that situation. He was a minute and scrupulous examination' f the, evidence
sure also that the House would' not expect, from ; which had been adduced at the trial,' and be then
such at humble individual as himself, that he would offered to the Court certain affidavits in support of
conduct himself so indecorously and improper.! his application. Did the Court intrench itself tie.
ly, as to attempt to vindicate the judgment -of a j hind their technical rules, or say that it was too late
Court formed, according to the institutions of the! to grant-a new trial? If persons &twitted came tap
country—a Court, the members of which he would for judgment at the distance of six years from the
venture to say were as distinguished by learning as ; trial, the Court would greet a new trial if they
any that ever sat in Westminster Hall, and who ! thought fit. But. the Court had heard from the
were not more distinguished by their learning titan Noble Lord all that could possibly have been ad-
by their strict and uniform attention to justice. He, dressed in his favour. The. paper which he read in
therefore, only laid in a claim, if the sentence of 'Court was drawn up by no mean hand,, and had eve.
that Court had experienced the universal censure dently the finish git a master. As to the matter of
which the lion. Gentleman opposite declared that affidavits, in'a cue like that in question, it was le
it had, to have it considered as the result of deep , constant rule of toort to refuse them. But What
and impartial deliberatiou on the part of persons of I were the affidavits offered by the Noble Lord ?
high and unimpeachable honour, who were in every Mr. 11011 Niill rose to order. If neither the re.
way calculated to discharge, with advantage to the port of the evidence, nor the affidavits wire to he
country, the important duties confided to them.--- allowed to be laid before the House, it not At.
Whether the circumstances of the rank and station I ting that they should take an account of the contents
of the individual in question, or the services which 1 of these affidavits, on the credit of any Mitelie4
he shad formerly rendered the country,, might be however high hie character in the House.
deemed fit, matter for representation in. a quarter to The ATIORN EY..G EN ER AL was thankful for
which a proper appeal was never made without suc- the interruption, bat if the Honourable and Learned
ems, he would tint say ; but this he would say, , Gentler can had listened to him, he would have found
that the House of Commons, would doper.. from their ! that in the waybe would have spoken of the alb-
cbtissitutional functions, if they entered into a consi- I davits, he had uo intention of injuring the cause of
deration, whether the punishment inflicted, by one of the Noble Lord.
the Courts of Westminster Hall, was too great or Mr. HORNER said, be had net latisfsptedi the
toe little in its amount. There was one most pier- Honourable and Learned emitleman because harms,
°us error, on which an Honourable Gentleman op. afraid that he meant to prejudget•the cum of the
posit. (Mr. Browne) had founded a great part of Noble Lord, 'bit peciuie 'be wished' that 'nothing.
_ .
Ile F Al of certain technical 1 *cull be stated which might in any wayprejudge the

Judges was such as to call for the interletenceof the
Nouse; but no such case u this-wifit ,present laid
before them. In such ~case,- however, the House
might properly call for all manner-Of evidence which
they might deem necessary. The-Bon. ind Learned
Gentleman had contended, that the?, would- bci
obliged, on this principle, to try OW Pitt_ ev_st*.
person tinder a similar sentence with dudeel tbe..Dle.,
ble Lord ; and among others he mentioned the
kews. But the Hem ,it was proper tb
were here called on to expel OOP of their
_,Mem.
Berl ; end the information they wished was merely
for the sake of informing their own consciences with
respect to the vote which they Wilt come to on that
subject." They had.nething to do with the Courts of
Justice, except something was stated which called '
bn them to act in their inquisitorial capacity. The
question reduced itself to this, Whether, for the
purpose of .voting on the motion for the expulsion,
it would be necessary for them to go over the eri-
dence at the trial ? In this case it did not seem ne-
cruary to him to call for more information' that they
bad before them. Ile was fully satisfied with the
verdict of the Jury, and the Judgment of the Court.
Bat on the principles on which be had formerly
voted for the expulsion of Members of that House,
he declared that in doing so he considered that he
did nothing more than send back to his constituents
the person excluded. He considered a iblemberas a
trustee for the people w hp sent him, and if in the
course of the trust, any thing should occur, whether
in consequence of the verdict of a Jury or. other. I
•wise, which might .call. for a revision of that trait,'
it would be proper to expel him the House ; and it
was in that light, and no other, that he could give
hiasepport to such 'measure. The verdict of a Jury'
ought, in his opinion, to hare credit given to it -by the

his argument. _ ha% spoken
rules, which had prevented the party convicted from
obtaining a revision of the verdict pronounced agai►►st
him ; and had • stated that that party complained of
the injustice of the verdict. Now, really, he (the
Attoruey•General) bad never, in the whole course
of his practice, -met with a single-case of k person so
convicted, who had paid the Court a compliment on

cense of either the prisoner or the Crown.
The ATTOItN l EN ERAL merely -wished
to state, that no technical rules had stood in the way
of the Noble Lord. He did not mean to stets the
contents of the affidavits, Weenie he did not know,
them himself, but merely,the grounds on which they
were not received.—One or the allidailte contained
ev

House, ai fir as to give thi constituents an opportu-
nity fOr. saying, whether they would any longer con:
eider the Member expelled sea fit .person to be sent
lo Parliament. On these grounds, be should` vote
against the motion. , „
Mr. W.'WYNNE did not think that any reason
mu given to induce the House to depart from .theli
_
-

his conviction, by abstaining from irteidgliing •gaiust
ft in similar terms. if the Noble Lord inveighed
against his sentence, therefore, he vas in a nu•.,
merous class. But the Honourable Gentleman had
maintained, that the -individual in question had
(taken every possible means to obtain a re-herring of
his case, but in vain; because the practice of the

the ience of a servant, who WASat
•u 4
_. .. ,
trial ;.-but kt,never..could• be peria,hisat plisks, MIMI II
lierUk. should he itlio*itl to amends i * ':1, .....gact
from the evidence given eta triervi
would be *pregnant, with the 'ovf;ii, peas.,',
quences. Another of
,tho atliilavits istike that of pot* 1
Boos in fttendebee in
,Coerr, snit dipisblo of *tog;
- Here

- •
practice in former instances-of a sit. nature. Had
any thing been stated against the justice of-the Coon,
or had any unfiainess on the part of the Judge, from
whatever cause, whether 'of a political nature or
otherwise, been alleged, he should feel it .a, cast where
% the Mee might with propriety enquire intetVea pro.
yeedirigs " the Ginn of Law • bet in th),:y:ese no
• House

et ,
s"
Court ass so termed round by techtneal relies, that
all hi. efforts were thereby rendered abortive. The
direct contrary of all this was most unequivocally
true. It became necessary for Mm to state what had
actually been the course of proceeding ; in Order to
show that there had been no impediments obtruded, nap'
technical rules, no fencing round, according to the
allegations of the Honourable Gentleman. There
was a rule of Court which provided, that in the case
of several persons convicted of a conspiracy, if any

or • ,
called, bat actually not, 401 ed at fill trial. adequate grow* bad been stated to Indite.) the
he would appeal to the common‘ Tense of justice.* to-go iMo the signify. , •
thellause it; 'tiipci4 villa* ', oiiiiiv od horrdefiSer . Tbliestioi watt an negatived. .
if Such a paw-ties were allowed, there would bean . MIK Irbil? WELLINGTON.
end to every thing' ilk* a trial.. 'The pthonerstiati Mr. W. WYDII4II adverting to-the arrival. of the
the advice and assistavies of the. Most able Connie' f., Dike, otWilltattool wished to know from. Ministers
if they .did not instruct the Otiose' . to call those' ishethes,' 44 had It .contemplation to pr.Tose and
persons it was their own fault rand .if the Geoid measursued Houseyto enable them to. pay shitabli.
thought it upon the whole more athentageoes not to honest, to that great and illustrious individual ? It
call the witnesses, then this was no teams nee to ' willed also to know, if, as had been usual at 04

. •
of a, war, it was in thew
to' thanks of the House to his Majeure
the consequence et peace would hears;
the ftitiei, the thanks ought to be look
possible.
[ANCELLOkot the EXCHEQUER
*few words across the table, but we were atterltf

unable to catch a single eipression:
Mr. WYNNll7saidt in the case' of de ntki
efietigitt it to vett, the. thank,*

the House Co him tor his' eneral conduct iu the
of the war- stone spppiiit a piTitiou to es
him, for, the pertiose of Giulio& klatitt
t. 41

_
aide atfifiti its thit country; Ile ,
tbat an early day should betted for tbCperiteas
which he had alluded.
ORAfffIR AtrteCiAlltrltk • `:
Sir J. NEWPORT hid he held in his bands a Si
tition, signed byw dentber of Protestantsandg44,l6 •
tics' of Ireland, friends to civil and religiOos tibj
At the conch:Won of a peace abroad, it' wits osier;
nary that peace sbould also be insured at boat": Qat
great meths of contributing to this tkii MC! end trOli
'be by putting. an end to all Associations througlik
Ireland, in toranteitotatloti of vietories long pint,.
At the end of 120. fears the victor ought not to le
allowed any 166gt+fiv ittinThph over the -

Jte%sing
1i0u5eh.,....4....th parties, , prosecutor& sod. L. come to, ~ ~a wit.. atm so y, on , , vanquished.
:'defendanta %Mae an earnest application littite.Lord grounds 'of that conclolion, that he could not silently le would appeal to the feeling, of the House, if to
I • • 1 '
Chief' Justice to derange theordinary forms by acre. tote *ilk him against the motion. With respect to • ttle of Culloden had been annually celetiratol i'
.. . a
i lerating the trial. To the prosecutors Ids Lordship the punishment,. there was „nothing which could in. ; EdlnbOrgh, that trannelllity would have been its.
said nothing—the wish of the defendants he nosh duce him to entreat hit opinion of the sentence, as Wished in Scotland.. He felt confident that a0..J..
not listen to from their nttorn or. our tirdhittri.: led es it bad any chance of being taken into con- proper motive would be artriboted to hint *Ate*
agentS ;" but required that thifirwebsitel should!e; eideration in that. quarter 'where. alone it could tin. sent occasion, as he himself gloried is 4,0
pear in Court to make the application. This Joe i.der*omodification...-[/kstr; hession—As to the Rules scended from One of these-Otkeenef Rini_
done, the Lord Chief Justice in consequence (to the' of 0100; .hr-iikdisot 14„0-00.4001, that the Court Dutch Guards, who contributed largeitteAltat
inconveuience of sit otter suitors in die pourt,), did proceeded strictly • andleigoiaitly. in the present case, ' tory, against the celebration of which he inlet sew
' appoint an early day kith. Mel. At the trial thi itecerdiug to their established Moe.. If the rule was contending.. Nothing more contributed to the es.
I defendants were defended'. by.. persons *Mi. established,%i was necessary to enferce it in that end . tracted state .of Ireland than such cornmemonittiii
eminent for their . talents. and -legal -knowledge...•ell ether cases. • But with regard to the role itself, ! which was considered by one party in"the light of iloi •
! They were tried by a Vela, ;err Oribe city. of the term smispesed wisdom, made as& of by the suit aOd degiadatron; and it was fruitless to aapposti
1 London, reduced by one Vela,
Igor. and Learned Gentleman, In :peaking, of 'it, that if due means were not used to put an enet.
I Johnstooe). • RythatJury they- etere.foundptilty. • seemed to him no bad description of that rule. He them, that the peace of Ireland would ever be tai,
lOn a subsiqtsent day, within a perieti preeeribed by Could not discoier in It the least reason or wisdom, ' stored. As the Government , (ad resolved to. poi*
' law, the individts Ito whom the present cievereittion and a: thousand cases might occur where it wouldi down ivory improper assembly which had a tendency
1..
principally related, applied in the Caurt'of King!, lead to hardship and oppression.—•[/fear, isear!]— ,to disturb the public peace, he called upon them tor
Etenchlor a new trial ; commencing Ms application He opposed the motion, `because he had the most on- ! the enforcement of the existing laws, perdcahrty
Iby slating, that he tunderstood•it could not-be soda shaken-conviction of the regularity of
.the proceed- : that of 1810, to put down all secret associathtes, and
Gby Counsel. In this statement he was entreated by Inge at the trial. The motion related to two species ito prohibit all processions decoratedlrith itsipiaea
i the Csiirt..,And he was also 101dt ,hit' Other Periors .of papers, the Report and the Affidavits. - The particular days, Which. were piling to see 'idyll '
1 genvitited of a conspiracy had bias tepid, the same House might order the affidavits, and other papers, the country. . . .. . .
mbroint,.thatthe Court tould nattier e motion for ' tending to throw light.on the question •befotel them, . The Petiticet. liiiir"tetitif. :lig: figelned to lie sm is
i nett; trial in the 'case or it Codapirady, whet' one to be laid before them ; but as to thl. noteilie be. I table. . _ . ~ -,. -, ,
i alone of those who bad been .engaged its the cost. tiered there was no precedent' to itarrant them in Mr. -riANKRS, as SChairman of the Comositititi
spivacy made the application. !rite Askews'batl.that ;caning for that, private document *Melt was kept by to whom the retitiops epilog any alteratieft le this
: morning made ass affidavit,, that they could not hying ' the Sedges' for the information Of the Jury, and of Corn Laws were 'referred, stated; that the Cermarittia'.
Into Court the persons who had been cossyicted with the Secretary of State, for the sake of ulterior pre-i had received frees Dublin returns of Grain in Mardi
!.. them; and ,yet they :were l'old,..that unless they.did ceedings. It was not in the ordinary coarse of tbi i and May which: differed- both as to quantity and
tso their application could not .be' listened ta. The i proceedings of the House; therefore, to call for the ''seltie. He Moved that an account, explanatory el
Noble, Lord was told the ante.' • -Let the Howie Report. Whether a case might- ot ague, when it I (Ms difference, should be laid before the Commit!
mark the sequel. The. Counsel 'for the di4endsmes: might be proper to address the Prince Recent for the I tee...-Ordered. -
on a subsequent day moved for in arrest of judgment: notes taken at. A trial, was 4.questidlolttogethei dif- : Lovd PALMERSTON presented a Petition from
'At least the Learned Sorjeatit, who was Counsel fort ferret ; bufnotiting..in the present al.-Was. anted ' the University of Cambridge, against the Copy-rigia
Butt, and who did every thing he undertook-with the which rentierettstreh.w 'Proceeding. adtletibl*.;: Hot 11111, itnd•praying that !heir existing rights might*
greatest ability, follo4ed by several others of the while he stated this, he differed With thellentiertible iltaintehms to-them.. ' • . . .
„highest talent, moved for .an arrest of judgment for' and Learned. Gentlemany as to what be ,tad said -Mr. WYNNE 'said, that the University of Doha
. hts'client. If Butt had succeeded in this application with respect to the examiqatibe of stridence in this ; lire, and" t'he Ring's Inn, hid •no right to any
1 ....if judgmetit sted been arrested with rellpactio!bini, , case, Which. hi 'contended to-begotooot upon a new ; beoks but shot* which were entered in triationsts%
it must have been arrested with respect. to eery one I trial. The Souse were 4Ssii.stiani any thing in • hail- • ki...• ,—. ...
i- of those implicated with him :in the same etfence.:-e- I the ordinary course of -Mild' osd jortspradence, but [ ThEntinen7,llll4 `*ad, end ordered io' fie' 'ea''
ii The Court, however, were dearly of opinion* end ! exercising a species of 'jurisdiction peculiar to i the table.
•- . .
IdAyered itAt opining' seriatim. that .tberert.l.lol•Bo- i.thcmselves ; end there was so, role to prevent! - Mr. WAIZACE obtained leave' to bring is a
, thing in any of the points which had been'
Urged that I them from Calling for evidence in a erase where it Ritt-to rionsverelt-doubts respecting the varlourDe-
...l riall.d for an arrest of judgment. What was' the I might be pro Per for them to interfere:- keitio.miiht ties and Taus imposed-by the several Governateets
• next proceeding? The Noble Lord, did precisely 1 b_e -stated, 'in which the coltdoct of the Jury and. in Indio-
tech& br __ - . - ._ - - ' the

On the motion of the CHANCELLOR .of
E'XCHEQUEIt, it Was ordered that the House, at
its rising, should adjobrn until Monday:
SPIRITS INTERCOURSE BILL.
The 'CHANCELLOR of the, EXCHEQUEI
moved that the Bill should be committed pro form
itied.that the discussion should take•place on the rs.
ownsideratiow of the' Report. ,
. Mr. FINDLAY pioposed that Counsel should be
Miffed in on the part of the Distillers of Mlle
sow,. Sm. , ••
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER sage
gestiidl that•it would be much more convenient to
postpone the hearing of Counsel until a future day.
Mr. WEiTERN opposed the principle and Tani.
ous enactments of the Bill on behalf of the Distillers
of England.
Mr. FJTZGERALD, after some lelearks, pre.
posed (hat the discussion should be pottpeeed until
the subject were more ripe for debate.
Mr. W. SMITH, at considerable length, argeei
against the Bill, and professed his determination to
oppose it in'ait its stages. -
Lad CASTLEREAGH supported it, arguing
that the measure Was fotinded upon reciprocity and,
justice, and that it only put the Irish distiller upon a
level with the Eitglish distiller. The Noble Lord
obncluded with expressing • hope, that that great
natiohai,seetlemegto.the I,7ltion, would never be die.
turbid, andestated, that. to his icnou ledge it was the
intention' of the authors otthat measure that the trade
of spirits between this pikt if the Empire and Ireland
should be perfectly free. - • .
Mr. W.' SMITH egplitisatitt'
Mr. BRAND coawieived that the operation
_et 00
Bill before the Tioasinetheld ite to -eve to the Irish
distillers 'the monopoly •of 'the English market, to

theobvious iirejnchce of the English distillers, whor-
es a farther !aggravation, 'were not to be made se/
altowtoeo for the taxes which they had paid upon
.the quantity' of -.spirits they had already distilled upon
the faith that the Ken-Intercourse Law would he
farther alatkaiNed. The amount of taxes so paid, Ira
*nderstood t3e•'lion. Member to state at 40010001.
700t000 winos:
W. el'

upon , gallons:
Mr. . iTZGER.ALD explained.
Mr. B. SIIAW maintained that the object and tea=
denci, of the. Bill was to establish a coniplete reel-
procity between England and-freland, as the Union
proEiosii‘lt was, in fact, its intention to correct
an erica:N:l,y. Which the drawback .epon spirits ex,
_ the

ported -from all parts of Great 13ritain being th
lime, the. Scotch distillers obtained through loch
drawback no less than two shillings and threepence
per gallon above tifejlag they actually paid, and thus
had an undue advantage. That thn Scotch tli,iiller
thould be 'lntim, tit retain that advantage to lite
prejudirctor Ake revenue aud.pf the distiller of. he•
land, might be natural, but he trusted that the jut'-
Lice of Parliament would remove the error, II I'd I it°
contply with the' reasonable desires of the Irish ail'

Tilt S'rATP.,S—M. AN
.. ,
_ .
i.ptotoorkitid desired a as?, trial, .p 'l4lliinatilo km
kw Lai irskittl until' ilie tither top. b /Pik Ain alit ,
orisir into tVe Court ilk. The Ole icon . Sid hilittile. the
lie' wise principle—asetely, thdt if Inter- their ionsideisti4u.
ere convicted of a tOnspiracy, and there was no ground for' it.
, least implicated, were on coming, the present motion 1-4 t wi

. .
............_..„,..._
4.1, sir trill. . -pr ' IN.conclasion 42
front patio*, 16 mote the
prop a sew trial i'forceS? As t
Ind, isi indigtainstil iduction of tl
What *at tie object of i as mirky as p
as to grant a new trial in 1
.The CHA