The Statesman.
London, England, 1820-08-23 00:00:00

THE STATES]

Where was ber Royal Highness &are.: -lie/ Royal
Highness was at the window eirlo of her bed-room or
her rahinet ; 1 do out remember which.
Where was Mahoinet —lle was coining out of the
stable when 1 first saw him.
11)ii! Malt t stand at the door to perform ?—He
stood near the window of her Royal Highness.
Wan Maboinet's barb turned to you ?-11e .tood rather
aside from me, but he faced the window where her
Royal Highness stood.
Were you 9ft the same side of the court at whirh her
Royal Highness was ?-1 wa4 nearly on the satue aide;
Mahomet was looking to the Princess's window.
Was the door at which you stood, at the saute side of
the court with the window at which the Princess stood?

—No; her Royal Highness stood at a window on one
side, and the door leading to the lake, was on the other
side. Mimeses here described the co►uparative situ-
ations of the door leading to the lake, and the window
at which tlw Princess stand, by pointing to the different
sides and corners of the !louse.)
Then you were neatly opposite to her Royal High-
ness ?—I was at the door boding to the lake.
And from the position in which yon stood, you could
see her Royal Highness ?—1 could more than see her. I
stood at the door and she was in the window.
And yet the Princess could not see you; will you
swear that ?—The Princess could see ►ue, but I do not

know whether she did or not.
Who ordered Mahoutet to play those tricks ?—1 do
not know.
For any thing you knew there may have been other
persons in the room with her Royal Highness at this
time ?—Tbere might, but I could not see any others, I
saw her Royal Highness looking out of the window,
but 1 did not see any other persons.
Did witness see Mahoniet play tricks'on any other oc-
casion ?—Yes, at the Villa Barons.
Wu her Royal Highness present then?—Yes.
Were any other persons present ?—ies, the people of
the family.
Men and womett ?—Yes, the footmen, coachmen, stll.
lions, and persons belonging to the kitchen—the people
of that sort who were shout the house.

Now Wits you were dismissed from the service of bur
Royal Highness, you say you went into the service of
(We could nut catch the !lathe.)
Were you in the service of her Reiyal Highness when
the affair of Ompteda took place ?
The SOLICITOR-tieNIIRAL-1 object to that question,
it is assuming a fact, of which the witness has not yet
stated his knowledge.
Examination continued.
Does witness recollect having seen the Baron Ompteda
at her Royal Highness's residence ?-1 do not remember
that name.
f id the witness, the year before the long voyage, of
which 1 have spoken, see a Berman Baron at the Villa
d'hste, or elsewhere ?-1 saw a Karon at 41ati Villa Vii-
lani, 1 thought he was a Prussian.
Will the witness state the name of thatlitiron as nearly
as he can recollect it, or will lie at least tell as what it
was like ?-1-cannot remember the ;rime, it was an ex- ,
ex-
traordinary! name. He was called the Baron—Baron— I
Baron something, 1 cannot recollect what.
Wu this Baron frequently at the house of her Royal
Highness?—As far as 1 recollect, he came twice; 1 can-
not swear whether lie tame oftener.
Why does witness recollect this Baron?-1 do not
know.
Did ant, thing oceor which made a nnige in her Royal
Highness s family connected with this Baron?—l do not
remember.
During witness's service at villa d'Eate or villa Villasi
does he recollect any examination of a blacksmith or
I locksmith respecting the picking of leeks or keys?-1
do not remember.

Or the making of false keys?-1 do not remember.
Did witness never hear of any such thing in the fa-
mily ?-1 do not remember ever having heard of such a
thing.
Does witness not recollect a quarrel having taken
place between Captain Huhruan and the Baron while be
remained at her Royal Highness's house?-1 have heard,
of the quarrel, but I do not know what caused it.
About what time did witness hear this?-1 do not re-
member the time.
Was it before or after the long voyage of which wit-
ness has spoken ?-1 do not remember.
About how long was it before witness left her Royal
Highness's service, and did weeks, niunths, or years to-
tervene ?-1 do not remember.
Does the witness mean to say that he does not know
whether a week or two years elapsed ?-1 do not re-
asember.
Do you recollect what company came to the theatre at
rade, where you say the Princess performed twice ?
I do not know.
Did the witness ever see the Prefect of Gums, Mr.
Toinasi, and his lady come to the theatre ?—1 do not
remember.
Did witness ever see the 31r. Mochetta, a Professor
from Milan, at the Princess's house ?—Yes.
Does the witness mean at the villa, or at the theatre?
—I have seen him on a visit to her Royal Highness,
but I do not know whether he attended the theatre

or not.
Did the witness see General Hubner. the Austrian
Commandant, at the Princess's house ?-1 remember
he visited her Royal Highness once.
Does witness remember General Pino having visited
the Princess?-1 recollect his coming once i 1 cannot
state whether be came more than once. He might have
done so. but 1 do not recollect it.
Did you wait at table during dinner ?—I did.
And will you take upon you to say, that you do not
know, whether General Pino. your old master, did not
dine with her Royal Highness more than once ?-1 re-
collect his dining once and only once.
Do you know the person of the Prefect Tomasi ?-
1 do.
Will yon say whether he and his lady did not dine
at the Princess's table more than once ?-1 do not re-
member.
Does witness mean to state, that they did not dine
there at all, or that they only dined thereon°, ?—1 only
remember their lining there once. They might have
dined there oftener, but 1 de not remeinher it.
Did not the persons who visited her Royal Highness,
take a part indiscriminately in the Plays which were
acted at the Theatre ?-1 do not remember.
A delay here twin took place, proceeding from the
interchange of tickets. • We fear that some part of the
examination has necessarily escaped us.
Examination continued.
Did the witness see any person in tile play but the
princess and fiergami ?—That he does net know. The
nsomt be entered, be saw no person but 'the-Princes!
and &qgami.
Did Capt. Homan take a part in the play?-Witness
don't recollect.
Did Cavalette attend ?—Witness did not recollect.
What description of comedy was it ?—Witness does
not know. When to entereckßergarni was in a sailor's
dress, planing thn_ buffoon. Shortly after be entered
Bertrand vosi the Princess went away.
Did Maims% exhilPit his dance at the comedy? —Wit-
nese did ant recollect.
After the witness left the terries of the Iciness of
Wales. lotto whose service did he go ?—Witswes went to
service in the bowie *film Marquis Marestalehi:
How long did the witness remain is the house of the
Marquis Marescalchi ?—For nearly a year.

Was the witness all that time in Italy ?—rto, be semi
part of the time in Ilermany.
How long had. he been in Germany ?—For two or
three months. He was not precise ;it might be a few
days more or Iris.
How long was witness with the Marquis at Vienna??
—Six or seven months.
What wages had the witness from the Marquis Mare-
ecalchi ?—At Milan he had fifty soldi per day, at Vienna

_
he had four Milan here.. •
How many soWi in a Milan Here ?--Twenty soldi
(Uhi).
Was the rise in his wages in consequence of his living
at an hotel ?—The rise in his wages was iu consequence
of his not receiving any dinner at Vienna.
How mach wages did her Royal Highness the Prin.
ress of Wales pay the witness ?—He received from her
Rnyal Highness 29 ducats in three months.
How much does each ducat contain ?—Each ducat
contains six litres and a half of Milan.
Had the witness 29 ducats in three months, besides
his living all the time and being supported at the table
of the Princess?—Yes.
Hail he any other advantages besides did not
remember.
Was her Royal Highness kind to all her servants?—
She was kind and familiar to all her servants.

When he received 50 soldi a day from the Marquis
of 51arescalchi, was he obliged to find himself ?—Wit-
nese slid not get meat, he got a sort of soup called
boteltpot.
Di 4 the witness save money, did he save a little for-
tes*. out of the wages he hat( (ruin her Royal Highness?
—Yea, be did, he put by seven hundred-litres.
Daring what time ?—During three years.
Did the witness save any thing out of the 50 soldi a
day which he had from the Marquis slarescalchi P—By
economy he saved a little for his tinnily.
What sloes his family consist of?—A wife and two
daughters.
how old are the daughters P—One was nine years
old, the other two years or two years and an half.
About what time did the witness quit the service of
the Marquis Marescalehi, at Vienna?—About three
years ago.
Into whose family did the witness go from the Mar-
quis Merescalchi ?-11e went to the service of the Am.
btmetdor at Vienna.
There are many Ambassadors at Vienna, was it into
Ilse family of the English Ambassador lie went ?—Yes,
le was to the English Ambassador's.
What was the name of the English Ambassador ?
lord Stewart.
Did witness go into the service of Lorii Stewart as a
steward, a postillion, or a lackey ?—Lord Stewart gave
him only his subsistence.
Was the witness in any capacity in the service of
Lord Stewart—was be attached to the embassy as pri-
vate secretary or what else?-11e was not a Secretary,
he was with the Ambassador, and got something from
him. •
Was the witness there as a private friend ?—No.
When first did the witness see his Excellency the
English Ambassador at Vienna ?—He does not recol-
lect ; he saw his Secretary first.
What was the name of the Secretary ?—l)urini.
Was be an Englishman or. au Italian?—Witness does
not know.
In what language did he speak to the witness?—ln
French.
Does the witness know a Colonel Browne ?-11e does.
What countrymen is Colonel Browne ?—lle does not
k now.
In what language did he talk with hint I—la Preach.
Whet did the witaess first see Colonel Browne at Mi-
lan, was it whilst be was in the service of Marquis
Nlarescalchl P—No.
In whose service was lie when he first saw Colonel
Browse ?—At the time he was not in the service of any
one; he had left the service of Marquis Marescalchi.
Did the witness mean to say that he had left the fa-
mily of Maiescalchi, and went a second time to Vi-
euna? —Witness left Vienna, and went to Milan to Co-
' lend Browne.
Did the witness go to, or with Colonel Browne to Vi-
MISS ?—He went to Colonel Browne.
Who did the witness go with from Milan to Vienna?—
Witness went to Vienna with his father.
At what time did witness go from Milan to Vienna
with the Marquis 3larescalchi ?—lt was on the 13th of
August, three years ago.
Does he mean the year 1817 ?—Yes.
At what time did the witness leave the service of the
Princess of Wales ?—la the year lsl7.
At what month in the year?—He does not remember.
Was it in summer or in winter?—it was in the begin-
ning of outuuter—it was daring the summer.
How long after witness left the service did he go to
the Marescalehi family at Vienna?—About five or six
months.
Why did the witness return to Milan from Vienna?—
He came to Milan to Colonel Browne.
Who accompanied witness ?—His father.
At this stage of the examination the Lord Cu tsrcet-
&on intimated that four o'clock, the hoar of adjourn-
Rent, had arrived.
Mr. Butouonast—My Lords, may I implore of the
House [murmurs, and cries of " No, nor]
Mr. fitment, A M—My Lords, allow me humbly to im-
plore you to reflect well before you stop short at so
critical a period of the cross-examination.
The Lord eIIaNCIILLOR asked how long was the cross-
examination likely to continue?
Mr. MINION fie replied, that though he might be able
to say how soon be could conclude an examination in
chief, the cross-examination must in a great degree de-
rad on the answers that the witness gives. As a sulk-
ier testifies of this he begged to observe to their Lord-
ships, that one unexpected answer which had been given
made it necessary for him to make a digression which
lasted for half an hour—(here there was a cry of "Do
on, go ea!"—and the cross-examination proceeded.)
Who seecompanied witness from Vienna to Milan ?
His father accompanied him.
Who sent his father to Vienna to witness?—lie does
not know.
What is his father ?—He is a carter.
Does he carry from Milan to Vienna and back ?—No.
How did it happen that his father paid witness a visit
to Vienna P—His father came to Vienna to tell witless
to go to Milan.
Did he go there with his cart ?—Nts. •
'At the tame that his father came to Vienna, was the
witness In the Ambassador's service?—He was not. •
Was witness living at the Mebane/dee's bottle?--No.
Waa it daring that time lie was supported by the Am-
bassador t—AW.
la whose service was the witness then ?-Lln the service
of the Marital. Maresealchl.
Did be we Colonel Browse as Milan did.
Wby (did the witness leave the service of the Marquis
of Mareakilchi, and go back with his titbit, the re•
spoetoble Garter, to Milan?--His fstber:tioeived Mos to
go be Mier with him, and be west.with
Did the witness go to Milan oat of the mere reaped
I bore to his father?—No, his father duelled him to go
itb him to Milan, because Colonel Browse *anted to
elk with Min.
Did not the witness represent on that ocesseimesidiati
bread depended on his place is, the 'weekw if tit*,
rquis Marescalcbi ?—He did.

Rot still when he desired willeri to go to to
speAk to Colonel Browse, he unit to speak to Colonel
litrorne?—lies.

Did the witness, when he was told that Colonel Browse
wanted to speak to him. leave his service and place to
go to Colonel Browne?—(Here some manners were
heard from the Lords.)
Mr. HROI*GHAIMI, with mach animation. addressed their
Lordships:—" My Lords," said lie, " in every Cons of
Justice this line of croft-examination is permitted, and
it is essential to the ends of justice, easy lives have
depended on the chance of a cross-examination ; at the
Old Bailey many lives have been saved by this line of
cross-examination, the lives the cheroots,. •&WA be
honour of every man might ad on it. Ile haw be-
fore his eyes two Noble Lordirtetto had *daft saved
the lives of individuals by adopting this IDOCIS of cross-
examination—(Hear, hear, and cries of "go oar)
The cross-examination proceeded.
Did the witness, when be was told that Colonel Browne
wanted to speak to him, leave his seevies and place •,.
go to Colonel Browne?—When his father told him •o,
he went to Colonel Browne.
If his father desired him to go to Colonel Black, would
he leave his service in the same manner?
The Sometroll-UENERAL objected to this question.
Mr. Mimosas,. said lie would not. argue the past.
Did the witness's father ever before desire witness to
go to Colonel Browne, or Colonel any ono ebo?—Neect-
iVitness's father never spoke to him to go to any other
person.
Had the wines ever seen Colonel 810,1111 before he
Went to speak with him?--Never.
How did witness support himself antis journey from
Vienna to Milan, in order to speak to Ceiheuel Browne
—Witness's father paid his expences.
Had his father made a private fortune by the lucrative
trade of a carter ?—He has not.
Did the witness and his father live comfortably on
their journey to Vienna to speak to Colouel Brownt
—He wanted nothing.
In what kind of a carriage did they go ?—ln a small
Curtin.
When they welt to Milan did his father introduce
witness to Col. Browne, to say that he Mlle to speak to
him ?—Yes.
Did the witness complain to Col. Browne of the loss
he sustained in giving np his good place and a good
master ?—He does not remember..
Did he make any bargain with the Marquis Maree-
oahiii as to his returning to him after he se* Colourt
Browne does not remember.
Has the witness a doubt that he made no such bar-
gain with the Marquis Mareecalchi ?—ile dues not re-
:umber.
Did he go back to the Martinis ?—Yes.
When did he go back to his service ?—He went not
into his service, but the Marquis sent for him to go wit A
him to Hungary.
Did he go as a private friend into the family of Ae
Marquis Marescalchi ?—He was asked by the Marquis
to go into Hungary as a cook for three months.
Did he receive any wages as a cook for those three
months from the Marquis —He received so wages, hot
the Marquis made him a present.
How long did he remain in Hungary ?—For that
months, or three months and a half.
Was the Marquis a friend of the English Ambas.e.
dor ?—Witness does not know.
Did he ever see the English Ambassador at hishonse ?
—lle did not.
How long was it since he tame home from hie trip to
Hungary with the Marquis Marescalchi ? —Last year,
after the month of August.
As he had no wages from the time be went to Maas
from Vienna, to the time he went back to the Marquis
Marescalchi for the purpose of going to Hungary, bow
did he support himself ?—The Ambassador gave him
somethir • to live on.

lIIK
Did the Ambassador give him every thing he 1,45441,
om the time be left Vienna to go to Milan with Lis
father ?—He does not recollect—Neu mi ricordo.
Did witness or his father par the expel:cis on this
comfortable journey to Milan ?—klia father paid the ex-
peaces.
Did they travel with post-horses or by currino ?—By
post.
Did they return so ?—No.
How did they return to Vienna ?—By currino.
Who gave witness money to pay for his emplaces
back ?—Col. Browne.
Did witness's father go back to Milan?—He did.
Is witness's father in this country at present?—He
And his wife ?—Yes.
And his family ?—No.
What square .does the witness live in in London =
He cannot tell the name of the place.
How •'id he come to the House of Lords that day "--
Did he walk or come in a carriage ?—He came on tcw
How many streets did he go through ?—He
ascertain. - •
How many minutes was be walking from his res;deti,e
or hotel to the place in which he then stood brAbuat
ten minutes.
Who came with him ?—A Gentleman ',howl he dues
not know.
Does witness's father live in the same hotel with Mn'
—Yes.

•
Does any body else ?—Yes.
About bow many others ?—lle does not know.
Will he swear that there are seventy ?—He cannot tell
because he does not know.
Are they all Italians ?—tie does not know, be never
asked.
Is there any other person with the witness at the hotel
but his venerable father and his amiable wife!?
The Lord CHAncsuAin objected to the Learned Gen-
tleman putting the question in this shape.
Are there any other Italians in the same place ?-4 be-
lieve so.
Have you any doubt ?—Tbere are other Italians.
Are there any waiters at the ion ?—1 do not know.
Do you know the same of the inn ?
The Souctroa-Ozase RA L objected that the Learn.l
Counsel had assumed the place was an ipn, and was pul-
ting questions founded upon that assumption. which was
irregular.
Mr. Bast:Guam agreed to put his question in another
shape.
is it an inn ?—I do not knew.
1 Is-there a sign ?—1 de not know.
Have they ever brought in a bill for you to pay ?-.-Ni.
Have you ever paid any bill ?----Not yet.
,• • "Are yo er pay yeerself fee your entertainment at the
ran?--1 have not liven asked before ;I do cotknow-
I ask you whether you ere to pay ?—I e keow.
Mire you ever la samba place balers, Mier* you did
vot two* wise waa se vay ? .
'Before the &wirer lxiet, tires.
Lard 'Wafture etpiebdol- a Mire to adjourn.
obs* als, Broughams was kibti *a coed of bis cross-
Mitinilallthlna.
11 1
lilt ii&eriesam said, be was Alai ' • e conclusion.
- •ho N d DoeosMlSoltt said, lbw s deserved
...,
preteoiemork moved tbribeeee alb adjourn.
MIK emom 11116106meloverialem, es ad t teek plate,
%pee ov mvaeniteradbmrshit live e'etiekla Wore is
eo be do Serf goitteireemet. ..74 .
,::e.: HI- zaft:. .

p

that; it w translatted
ivu-lay
#•,- - .
PRICE •OF S tli
ita.nE Stott 544
S Mit Rid. SSW S
3 •
0•114, Qom SS
34 pet. Cost; t 7
• :i•r•CaSs:Sfai 87
IEL*Sr iPt.
Lo 4 Rno. 13 I-16
I esti. I pot Clot. Aim. 0:11

- .
•4; alaW ariditty gdittify our .1101WOUS readers Will
a r early pOblitationwf oar Paper at this interesting period.
e ki1ic:4101149.11 via such anabstract of the forenoon pro-
ceq.4o is ht e House of Lords Is the thortneht of our time
wo 3•Pteti. 8y recent arrangement% we shall be enabled
to etuand coeviderably our report of theme prerredingg: and
vet tree within our oriiiaary time of ratification. —One
hecoad mitten Will contain. as unaid. • felt amount of the
otatoinotion of witncsids to the close of the day.
Fur Its naltiorwes tailors of our .Corratepoodent,‘ we cam
uciy al rowel mimosa our seknowlodginents. Their mat-
muticatioas. though necessarily postponod. lhsll bd dnly at-
tenad to its soon a% opportunity permits. •
to' Oki Solorriher whasotiees the ainielodited Geneve,
is itiutestoin of yrotelf46. see have only to reply.,
`At it was 1.-- ".4 verbatimTrona dinstituthrand

;

DAY AT ONF O'CLOC•Y
IrAdit Mork 1113 f • 1
Ditto Roads tactic, pm.
OW Anna Mos '

•••• re, .
tlitto CAM.
Mu

Cott. for i 7 1%. •
Lott. Tiekets 2U. Itli.

MU WATER AT LONDON BRIM* • •
ro-aoaabw.
Maraint.-Slhals.aftert.—Emairg, SS mia. 81.1;r.R;._

• • ate liptateilmatt
trt
IliMilli eterkilllill" II INCOIIIPORATIM Nils " TEE
e • .

IONDON:
.111r1M/VIDAT :trams Nu, atictsT
•23; lilt
.ATFEMPT ft) OffiLitItECTION • .
•Tflo ramour which we stated yesterday of the distil
of ebe.Ktrra of France, arose, we 'end, from some col;
foo4issteUigence which had heen received from Pirii;
°Fail altruskug occarresee that had taken place flibil!;
ou ete aight.of Saturday last. From The Monitiisr
of &today, we this day. learn, that an attempt Lit
been for some time past forming among the troops to*
oyes:throw the Bourbon dynasty, and to proclaim al
Strqreiira, some, of the BC•N trARTZAN family. It
aas...Ars:that one parr of the plan was to seise on the'
Cush of Vincennis, where a fire, that was soon est-
tileished, broke out about 3 o'clock on Saturday'
artser.eon, and was supposed to have been inttndolt•
t create disor.ler. and favour an attack. A certain
number of offi:ers and non-commissioned officers of the
corrin garrison at Paris are Confessed to have been
siduced, and some even of the Royal Guard. On Sa-
turday evening. these otftoers, it is said, hatl agreed
alum/ thetnnelves, to assemble the soldiers, and to
marairagainst the Palate of the Kano bat just about
ths-tinis when the plot *as to have exploded, tome of
th.ase.who hadisinti tampered with disclosed it to their
Igyiefs. and the leaders of the Conspiracy were
prvistad. Thr Musiteur takes occasion to add, that
piq of Paris enjoys the most perfect tranquillity,
sna !bit the eitisene have learnt, is the same moments
tts,eikstelusterf the plot, and the arrest of its authors.
Other accounts state, that a body .of the Insurgents,
&slay military men, had placarded the streets of
Pis Ai! ana shouted “ Five la Charts." These, how
aver, were speedily surrounded, and twenty-five officers
ware spebentietl. It is farther mentioned, that the
plibah had to rise in the supposition that a revolution
was to take place in London on the 17th instant,
which would make it a favourable moment for the
4:suontewted in France to rally round a revolutionary
anoraks d. All accounts agree that the affair piodueed
"sty little sensation at Paris, as the following state-
,ca-¢t of the funds will shew
french Funds, Five per cents., Friday, 7/3f. 65c.
-.W4stra,T. 78E. 25e•

. . . . •
- now was a well-known witness on the trial
..ererpsr flarrttfos who acquired, by the nee be meiS
-o(. his "rapt of recollection, the appellation of Iliensoly
•1101poiAeos. He is scarcely forgotten, when a brags.
ir,apdidate for a similar distinction appears upon
awe t and " Non mei ricerds" 'will be associated with
th Bair of tits-tocr.4, as hag as school-boyi
resSember that Rickwhmii, llflittmiscon and Oast•
risco' are .governed by the same Grammar Halo.
When he told his tale, apes the filer 11 de,
as the natives of one sister Island say, aviddetig.
gild he Siii;i'reailit4(ol 'ionsPleti. • fie led
to Nish Ate leison welt. " Greet
wits, it is said. have short memories" but this proverb
assaiford. Itsente4 no apology for Signor Majocci t kw
"Ise is such a fanfares (low fellow)" the Goverment
interpreter alleges ". *it -he does sot understand the
souneenest wind." Is more to fat laretnted by hill
• -friends that his unclerstaadieg 'herald be so derectlMP
.•hOtb I. recollection aid perception, fur according to Astor
0.4 of war proverbs, it is said that a certain descriptis
of penults attest to be gifted with good memories. TW
tisfortunate def6ct a:posed him yesterday to a few it
..thaw apparent oastradicdons of which the Avroaner.
• iseam. et the Wass will not hesitate to avail.
.1110 memory by the means of cross-murination
less ildellitian remising brighter, and at other times
Awe dual. • Re was, howerbr, brought to ae-
*.ierwhige diet there were mole passages to the bed:
tbeenbor if the gesosie resides/ethos he remembered
fie 112 onamisation In chief; that the .bastions demo
' was sot so olfeielve to &limey as be had previously es-
pressos! It t and that oast otatessests, which be had
mule without lestitados. , sight afterwards. be quailed
with * Noe mi girlde." " ( dust romatabes," is is-
Mods Op lads** of hie msg. To what way the lopes@
resemstes of his recoliseeloo may Mod, it is hitherto
tit estkipme I bet the sr ef his tale, we
*Min soy silemest-from he bigiagag.

• THEAUEEN.

57147'18.11A:0-0111I6E, WED.SZSDAT, FW

*: •

. ~- - ~

ROUE OF ILORD9, Ace:
The "puled the nstial'hour, dad' littalin
were reAd.by.tbe Bishop of Landau.
PRINTED PROCEEDI7COR.
The Pad of PARLINSTON, before the Mouse
.prt.
ceeded in the business of the day, suggested the brit
priety of haring printed copies of the etridencillaA
upon the table. •
. The Earl of Lai•nr.to %LE observed, that the pubes
•
ought to be called on to deliver in plans 'flit..lA-ries
in which the Queen's conduct was questiisiotl.4:
• The Earl of LIVIRPOOI. did not objeei. In Aso AS--
• •
posal of Lord Darlington, but he *as desireis of Hav-
ing the evidence as accurate as possible.
The Lord Cusscau.on pointed out seta dillieuhy
in the way of the proposed arrangemeni, fciasioned
by the forms of the House, which required? thet
•of the short-hand writer to be compared -si•t&
notes of the Clerk at the table, who was rtsensitkiti
for all that was published, and laid beforithiir Lo
ships. The proposition of the Earl orliaklisigtonlaan
.not adopted. 'Plea:' House took dose to amaileinthesibet
,theY iwtinla depart' from their sloßdltitifiliki'vstith•
,operated arlinst th;arraritement. is R:srry
the Ners were then called oter,
to the Bar at twenty urinates after ten ti'cleek: ;
BROUGHAM then continued his cross-exatigna-

• - ,

thin of the witness, Theodore Majocri.
Du you recollect a Merman Baron visiting her
Highness at Naples ?—I do not re-ollect that.
Do you're collect a tierthan 114ron visiting her Royal
Highness the Princess of Wales at tient*, ea her way •
from Naples to Milan ?—I do not.
Did he visit her Royal Highness at the Villa VB.]
lani ?—During her residence there, there wait a Aare
who seemed to be a Prussian, he paid his *lath':
Was the name of the party Ompteda. or any
.aarts•
sounding like that ?—1 cannot recollect the name by
which he was coiled. It was an extraordinary name.
Are you sure it was not Baron Ompteda ?-71 don't
recollect,
Do you recollect the Baron, whatever hig tare was,
sleeping there more than once ?--I remember to slept
there once, more I do not recollect.

Had he not meant' who used to be with the ser-
vants of the house ?—I remember he.had servers, bat
whether they were with the servants of her Royal
Highness I de not recollect.

Was there not a room :n the Villa YiHaul called the
Baron's room, giving him the extrattrilluary same
whatever it was 7-1 don't retnemlter this.
Do you remember a thuniker storm as the Lein,
la which het Royal illrghness's party was eitt;tneeiy
wet don't recollect that. •
You have said, that in the house at Naples, the rest
of the stiite of her Royal Highness, except pergami,
slept in another part of the house from the Princess.
Do you mean to say that Bergami's roam was sot se-
parated from the Princess ?—1 do not remember that
, her Royal highness and Bergami slept separate.
Is there say reuse now to say the rest of the site.
except

Bergatni, did not sleep in separate and distinct
apartments?-1 remember the positkon of het Royal
Highness's bed-room and Bergami•'s bed-cemm. Ido not
recollect where the rest of the mite slept.

Then you will sot swear now, the rest of the mike
of her Royal Highness did sleep in a separate. part of
the house?--I remember well where her Royal 11lessees
and Bergami slept. Ai to the rest of the family; I co-
met recollect where they slept.
Did you not say yesterday that the other part of
the suite slept at a distince from the part of thVbense
where Bergami and her Royal Highness slept ?-1
said they were separated, but 1 meant they Were so
separated that they eould not eounnunicate together.
'Did you mesa by that, that there was ne passage
by which persons could go to the room of her Royil
Highness, unless they went through Bergamredifees ?
Here the Lord Veatteau.ox said, the usual mode
of judicial proceeding upon crose-sttittlhatiOn 'ft
read the answer given by the witiesi on *fisemett•Mt•
cation and them ask him what ansirWin 'rJidKttal, &
After some observations on the isplaqWer;4lllle.
Baosease went on. . r..
. . .
Do you mean to say there was
to the silt, of her Royal Iligiaim. s ttar wig
through Berguni's room ?—,Wbat 1 erresemiserhi, that
1 have seen no ether than one paesage.
Do you mean to represent that there was am !my of
getting from her Royal Ilighuess's Psi.; 114,
rooms of the rest of her suite, but through. paling*.
leading to Bergasai's room 7-1 have not men may pep
sage that led from her Royal Highness's ro;su li die
rest of the family. except that which led to Bergasii
less. •
. _„. t.
Will you swear that Ilieronymous, Dr. 'reel IMO
William Austin, were not close by her *gar High;
oess's room ?—I do not recollect.
When you west from Vienna to Milan, where Mr"'
ledge T--At my own house.
How did you support yousall?-08 my ewe wi4;',
Now kin did it lam A=ldo um blow. •
Did any body give yes 'gooey there?-1 &g'% Inkjil
salon 1 left Vienna, brecedired.morey. bet Om
I romived no aimary.
Missy ono give you sooty at Mika ?-4 mobil
8111,

e"-. e74*

- - -

iti i

I

vinervmm.
tltbitil& ti
ti emit Mt,
•