The Statesman.
London, England, 1820-09-01 00:00:00

1 biro yin were applied to very soon after yos left
the melee of die Princess--witbin half a year ?—l: was
logger, nearly owe year.
Yen was applied to thee, to knew what roe ha to
say about the Prisons 7—Yes, one year alter.
Do you mean to represent that an application was set
made to you mach earlier ?—No.
Yon are sore not within halts year ?—No application
was made to me earlier than one year after.
Do yen mean to swear that ?—f es.
Not by letter or otherwise ? May I explain', I knew
sow what you mean.
(After some opposition, on the pert of the Qmett's
Comma, the witness made the following statement:
" 31x months after I left the service of the Princos4 I
wrote to my sister to say application had been mike to
me : but that was only a dotible entendre between my
sister and me."]
Have you never said that the Prince*, was sarreesed-
ed w ith spies when she was in Italy 2-1 don't recollect
baying said so.
Yon have not represented it in any manner I—l don't
recollect.
Will you swear that you have not ?-1 won't swear.
Have you a treacherous memory ?—No, bet it is so
long that I can't recollect what I might bays said in
con versatitia.

Will you swear that you represented it in one way
lotber?-1 can't recollect.

Do yon know Omptrda ?—Yes.
Have you ever spoken to him ?—Onee at the
Mani.

That was when he was on a visit to the Princess I
suppose ?—He was there, and I 'oppose on a visit to bee
Rvl Highness. • -
ras be often there ?—He stopped for some days
But I ask if be has been more than once there whilst
you were in the service of the Princess ?—Yes.
How many times have von known him on a visit to
her Royal Highness ?—I have seen him at three different
places.
On one occasion yen say lie stopped 3 or 4 days, were
his other visits of as long duration r-1 think not.
But the other two visits, were they of the same dura-
tion ?—They were of shorter duration as far as I re-
collect.

On which occasion was it that a complaint was mad*
by the Princess of the conduct of this Baron at her
house ?

The Soucrron-Gasaaat..-1 object to the form •f
that question.
The Loan CALI
a complaint.
Wu there not a complaint during one of his visits, of
his conduct ?—Yes.

on. You must ask first if there

On what occasion ?—Asiar as 1 recollect it was at
Villa Villani.
Was the complaint about locks, or false keys?
The SoLICITOR-OKNICOAL objected to this inestkap:
The Loan CUAKCIILLoII said the quell. t *INA im-
proper one.
Mr. WILLIAms. lam 'n your Lordship's hands, but
1 have always considered that 1 had a right in cross-
examination to assume any tact, and to put it in an in-
terrogatory shape.
Was the complaint about locks?—! don't recollect
respecting what.
Not respecting the conduct of Baron Ouiptetta,
whilst he was in the house of the Princesojr---1 do not
recollect whether it was whilst be was in di house or
after lie was rune. (Question repeated.) I do
snot
recollect what was the subject elf e 4 eappialat.
Why did you not take a ciSifsidaallie
the complaint ?—No.
Did you not write a challenge ? —1 don't recollect;
Did Ton, or did you not write a letter for Mr.
Ilawland?—l do not remember writing any letter for
Mr. Ilawland, nor for any body else.

PRICE OF STOCKS Tll
Beak Stock II
II per Cont. Rod. Ole
II per Ct. Cons. 67111
4 Per Vel•
6 per Cents. no. te 6611
6 pr Ct. Navy 1631 103
Loss Ann. 18 1-16
lop. 3 per Cost. Ann. 671

DAY AT
India Stook
Dittoßoods Vls. Ms.
Old Aottuitirs
Et. Bills 2d. is. Is. 4a. ps.
Ditto Co..
Osmium
Coa. for ditto 671 081 08
Lott. Tickets

E o•CLOCK.

HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE To-ronnow
Morning. 10 min. after o.—Evening, 3A min. after 10.