The Statesman.
London, England, 1819-05-22 00:00:00

HANK OF ENGLAND.

Mr. Drum tr;renew•ii a (notion which holied made
in the hat )ear, on behalf of a Proprietor of Bank
stock, for a blendanius. r.lling on the Batik Direc-
tor, to lay before the Proptietors at their neat Ge.
petal Meeting, as actilunt of the charges and es.
ponces for the management of the Compano affairs,
and a statement rf their present finarces. The
Learned Counsel slated, that the aMilitaits on which
he `rounded his present motion were free from she
eacelitions urged again.' him on the former oeraslon,
namely, filet the Applicant had not called on the
Bank Directors to render the account required, for
that previous to the present application eurh a re.
qui•ition had been made and compliant., refused.
The Cover, after having heard Mr. Denman in sop.
port of his motion, were of opinion they bad no Who.
rity to interfere on the present occasion by granting this
M madame', the Bank of England being a trading Gum-
pane ; and if they were to interfere in Ibis besinesi,
the Covet of King's Bench woeld be celled on to
become 'wants to all the trading Companies in Eng.
laud, where any of the partners in such Companies
happened to be gissatis6ed with the proceedings of
the managers of their concerns T►e only coerce to
be pursued in this case was, to take the sense of the
general body of Proprietors, who were alone com-
petent to settle the dispute. As matter of partner-
ship, the Crier( of Chancery was the only tribunal to
which a disaatithed partner could resort for redress.—
Kul. serried.

COURT OF COMMON PLEA*. NAT 41.
iriALoi D. UPIIIILL.

This was an action 'tied before Mr. Jostles
RtcuAinson, at the last Assists for Somersetsbire;
it was so action brought by the Rector of a Parish,
in older to recover tithe for a certain number of
calves and lambs which were dropt iw the parish, bat
were ant set oat, on the ground, that at the time is
which tithe was claimed for them by the Rector, they
sere net weaned. A verdict was given of al.
damages for the Plaiotiff, sad the Defendant was
allowed to enter a non•seit, subject to a decision of
the Coast of Common Pleas, as to the law en the
'object.
_ . _

bir.Serjeant Lars, In showing cam spinet the rate
for a now trial, said, that the qevstion was, et whet
time the right of tithe originally attached to the Roc..
for ? The Learned Svrjeout said, ho could sot led
say precise determination on that point, bet argued
from the case of " Boyce and Elite," 5.1 Ingham,
p. 317; that the right of tithe shack's when tho ani•
oral comes into the world, although it is not to bete.
moved by the Rector until it comes 'efficiently Walton
to be evened.

Mr. Serjeant BILL, in support of the rule, said,
that it was a singular circumstance that •o lON in the
hooks could be Wend to decide this important past.
The Learned &quasi, in order to prow. that the right
of tithe scorers to the Rector only when the animal
is 6t to be weaned, argued from•the case of " New-
man and Morgan," 10th vol. East, in w►ich it was
decided, that the right of the Rector did sot attac►
to the grass immediately when cat. In support of
the same inference, he also cited the case of " Kee-
yon t'. West."
Mr. Serjeant COPLET, on the same aide, awed,
that the case of " Boyce and Ellis," was not of any
authority in this instance. By consulting the sai-
-1 mina! books, be said, it would be seen that the limo
I for tithing lambs is wheel they are fit to be weaned.
The Cover decided, that the right of the Rector
to tithe vests the moment the animal is drupt, •n
point of principle as well as etiology, the doctrine as
to corn, as well in the case of grass beteg, that the
right vests even before it is set oat. If no decision
on the subject bad beets hitherto made, it was be-
cause the principle now laid down was taken foe
granted.
The Itale was, accordingly, discharged.