The Statesman.
London, England, 1812-04-24 00:00:00

. • •
1923-.

LONDON, FRIDAY,

181 i

PR ICE 61D.

- . . . .
,A,„,lawdlEasiziass. .
- itit:-.113k; ROYAL,, C44".1.- GA""s• former debates which had taken o.f:re during the moral dissolution. 11!nt the chargeS had been iii-
it advisable tocha i e m halal answer."
rra 0 i.s- - EVENING, April 24, Will present Session, he had thought Ig u p.. y• and the calotnnies had been
.
' • he rolloweett. . •° the nature of the motion which he meant to submit completely repelled. l'lv., answers of the six most
Ja. * ...* THE t tIMEDT OF ERRORS :to the House. Ile had accordingly altered it to a celebrated Catholic Universities of . Europe fri the.
fro the mere consideratiott of this impor- several questions which had been submitted to them
A ner objets. for tie Oro tau.. a Nett Grand Aielo-Dtarnalic i motion,
apeendr, caned ; tent question. Ile trusted that when he railed upon in all these points, fully established the vile .false-
• THE SECRET MINE.
rt
ry the Eigh,h.__(), mondiv, Kin% : the 'lipase, not to decide upon the merits of the hood of the charges. These Univeraities SOiemtilf
Ril::alidul,lnloK.,:ll,lLOrni tbiliday, IlleaAre f,r Mr Mil e 4 :WI: terse but to take the laws of disqualification of decided, and publicly declared, that Hie Pope had
tp.11,,, ,a,,. sittano..—tan Wednesdayb Every Masi_ t:
.1,1, ln
i„ Wife . threet.-fourtth: of the people of Ireland into consi- no temporal power whatever in the dominions of
lean..—tni Taiir,diky, Jalies Cresar.-0a kredny. R
i there ion, .e proposition with which he should other Sovereigns—they declared that the Pope had
awl le are a Wife.
: couclude, would be acceded to. Ile trusted that no dispensing power to absolve Catholics, in any '
every Gentleman, who was of opinion that this mo- country, from the bond of their allegiance, or the
meutous subject ought to he considered—that every obligations of their moral engagements upon oath
one who thought that the claims of the Catholics towards the Protestants. When they replied to the
shoulkbe ultimately conceded—who felt even that question as to the principle of keeping faith with
the disabilities under which they laboured, ought to ; heretics, they accompanied their answer with an !
*peremptorily enforced *knot)!
limitation---thati eaprening.ef horror, that any donbt could be en- I
4lawin?, lane who/deo*: that tfl‘zy 4-ttrlol be eilfOreed4 tertaisesd upon the subject. Another srouid of ob-
i only with conditiens—in short, that every Membetr ,section. to the Catholics wa,s, that they dectined4
of every descriptioa, whatever maybe his views of l taking those tests which the State required.' Hut..
the subject, who was of opinion, that the question ! was not their refusal to take a test which they
',4hould be considered at all, would vote for his mo- i felt they could not take with a clear conscience, a
lion. He was inclined to shape his motion in this I sufficient Security. for their faithful observance of
form, from what had fallen in a former debate, par- ° say oaths which the State may prescribe as a seen-
ticularly from a Right lion. Gentleman opposite , rity, and *hay could take •without violating their
(Mr. Canning), whose taleuts and character, and conscience ?---Ifere was a conclusive evidence of
just estimation in that House, gave considerable their fidelity to their engagements. As to the ege-
weight to any this - that fell from him. These were neral charge against their loyalty, he should oppose
' -ondt

this applioation to the wisdom sof Parliament, in fa.
Your of the Roman Catholic claims, which he had
before opposed ; be9tttsa he looked upon the toncei-
,
sons they demanded, as.essential to the good of the
State. [near, /war, hear!] Tilley had, besides,
the Petitions of the great- body of Protestant mer-
chants of Ireland, Wed of a large proportion of the
Presbyterians in that country, in support of the c.a..
tholic Petition. So that by coupling these petitions
with that of the Catholics, he felt fully justified in
stating, that the House .was to decide that night
upon the P.etition of the whole of the property, and
morally Of. the whole population of that country.
They had thee-the Petijion of Ireland submitted to
their consideration. •Ffe sincerely congratulated the
Protestant interest of that country for the meekness
of their demeanour, for the wise. and true 111314 of
respect which they manifested for the civil rights-
and liberties. of their . fellow subjects, and fat the
warning voice aihli which they came .fhlwara`lit
claim that these rights and civil. libei:tiev.should be
ettended to the Chtholics, for the preservation of
the British empire.--[Hear, hear, hear!}—Their
application was peculiarly entitled to .atteatiott, be-'
cause," if ill was to betide the greet, they would
partake of the danger. Before that 'Mouse, %these-
fore, should determine to distiniss-the payee ofithese
petitioners, he would intreat of Gentlemen to conai.
der'

FBEEHOLD ItEsinv.mcm. BRIGHTON, SUSSEX.
TO NOLO BY AUCTION,
By Mr. ATTRER,
At the old Ship Twvern, we TUESDA Y, May 12, 1131 I, at
Twelve ti Clock,
CAPITAL FILEMBOLD FAMILY ItPSI-
DENCE. Warms roleemmi, biting No. 21, ..n the
Grand Parade. coonsamsdiag **Aleut viers' of the Pavilion,
Lerof•••orrta.n—/MR/11. Amps, Sm. anti bon a anent distance
Dam Me Old ton-..
The Premises mental othelswkimement * rood Ititritea, ser-
vants' hall, bailer% puttee". iliery, wine cellar, and conve-
;arm Owes t on the grimed *tor, a spacious dining-rooartnd 1
water closet ;on Ow &Or etravrint• ~,,, no of large Seinen-
room, and be chamber; ; on the woad doer two chainklers ;
mt
the attic Moor two rooms mil two'gnoti garret', over % •
The it hok.fitted up with materna, eloweti, forreptsmp, well
supplied with esrellent water, and Aro well cutoff:tied for the
ressletire of n Gentleman's family.
The Premises to be viewed by applying' to Mn Pratt,
Builder, No. 46, fligh-etreet sof whom farther Partieabirs
may be had; salmi of Mr. Am-re, at his General Agency Other,
North-street. Brighton; and of Mr. Winter, Builder, Lewes.

T•IURSDAY NEXT WILL PRODUCE MORE RENE-
riciAt. CHANCES THAN WAS EVER INTRO.
DUCE!) IN ANY torrmiltv
IloatisßY and CO. solicit the attention of the
Pahlic to the prt sent Scheme, 'uml hope to he bummed
with their favours, as Web shall be did) attended to. Tickets and
Shares are tellies( by Ilewthhv and Co. at their old-estahlislwd
State Lottery Office, 26, Coruhill, in great variety of Num-
bear, antral the most reasonable terms, where all Prizes are
immediate-la paid.

the considerations that inclined him to change the
form and nature of his motion. The House should
bear in mind, that, in considering the subject of the
Catholic claims, there were two countries whose
situation. ought to influence their decision. He

fact to sophistry—he should appeal to their conduet,
and bid a ready refutation of the foul calumny in
the established acknowledgment of their practical
loyalty. This was the answer which he would give
to such a charge. Let Gentlemen look to their

that it was the petition of Ireland they were In
fact to decide upon. Ireland present herself 'at
their Bar to demand her rights. They. liad 'tikes
from her her Parliament, and she came• ii pt tsnn to
their.bar to plead the cause of three-fourths of her 4

would allow that the circumstances of Spain and Por-
tugal, the two nations our allies in the-Peninsula,
might be influence by it in a very sensible degree.
But the two nations whose situation should most
have influence upon this vital discussion were Ire-
land and America. The nature of the question wan
so momentous, that their folly in the decision of it
might ruin, and their wisdom would save the Bri-
tish Empire. So firmly was he convinced of this,
that he had no hesitation in saying, that in the
vote they should pats won it, they would ar-
bitrate the 'destinies of England. By a wrong
course they would destroy her mein anchor in
the old world, and overturn .her power in the new
world. If they should decide against his pro-
position, they would decide against three-fourths
of 'the inhabitants •of Ireland, and one-fourth of
the population of the United Kingdom. They
would, by that vote, deprive that large and essen-
tial portion of the British Empire of their civil
liberty and political rights, in short, every privilege
`-‘t can be desirable or valued in a state of civil so-
Thr Gtibtleinen who eaviff~

Journals, let them contemplate there the frequent
and solemn expression of their approbation of the
Catholics. What idea could they form from the
rotes of thanks to the Catholics, hut that every
such vote was an acquittal of the Catholics from the
foul charge of disloyalty ? .When that House had
adopted thus the language of approbation, it de-
clared the Catholics innocent; each vote of thanks
was a recorded verdict of acquittal in favour of the
Catholics, and a solemn judgment of guilt against
the Parliament.—[llear, hear!]—lfere, in truth,
they had the Parliament and the Penal Code on one
side, and the Catholics, and their recorded inn°,
cence on the other; the Parliament was thereby, in
fact, convicted, and the Catholics absolved from
guilt. But in addition to all this accumulation of
proof of innocence, and this solemn verdict of ac-
quittal, where, he would ask, were the numerous
Protestant Petitious, with which their table was
to be weighed down against the claims of the
Catholics ? Where were the Petitions which were
to come in from all quarters upon this question
--ma was that mass of thew► *hick was 110.1

population. The House should bear in mind, the
vast importance .of Ireland to Great • Britain in a
Knancial view. She yields ten millions in taxes, two
:•millions in absentees, five millions in interest; in
'short, she contributed to the service of the Stan
i every way above twenty millions. When they- tate&
Ireland to such an amount, and she came in person/
to their har *ith a petition for concession, was it•
r right that they should disraiqs her with a sentence of
disqualification against three-fourths of her popula
Mon,. and one fourth of the whole population of the
!Jolted Kingdom ? If they should pursue so nngra-
cieus a course, he must say, that they would not act
justly by Ireland. But it might be said that the re-
jection of these claims was a Court measure. Yes,
but he,was not afraid of a Court measure. They
" had a Court measure to contend against in 1782, and
were not disheartened—they encountered it and pie
it down. [Hear, hear!) In 1792, they had an-
, other Court measure to face. Twenty-live Only con-
, tended against that Court measure at first, yet in the
short space-of bne year they succeeded. in removing
`...j„firef.4 - measures therefore had no ter.
e if

NEXT THURSDAY ALRAWNL THK LOTTERY WILL BE
D.
WIFT and CO. the Contractors, respectfullY
sabluit the following SCHEME of the pit ESEN T LOT-
TERY, to the inspeetion of the Public. They do not con-
ceive that anv rolumtni %p.m its iadinutages is ueemary, as
they feel insured that its superiority will appe;ir ono fuir com-
parison with the Scheme or any farmer Lottery. Tickets and
Shirrs are on Sole itt theirOffievn. No. 11. Poultry, 3Y. Chfifiltp
MVPS, and 31, Aldgate High-some,. where, its the last Lottery.
drann 'gist of January. No. 5,497, n Prize of £lO o.'o, nod
Nu. 995, a Prise of £I,OA were both Sold iu Shares. 7
SCHEME.

1 Prize or -iiii:xxi7.-.. is .....C20.000
1 • If‘,ooo ••• 15.000
1 ....
l
1 . % - 4.000
1 .
I
4
8
8 • 400
10 ... . .c SOO
5t.....1.4-i. e......... • •WO
20
2.01.10 - - •
be
70
109
114
2.0.10
.._ 13
.. . _ . .

.rely. Jose . ...ti, ,to co.- Court
_ _ ____ ___
concession should not be granted now, by now Meant I strew the floors of that House with accumulated , rors ray him 7 `the cause he soppertedi was swot the
never—[hear, hear !]—but they could not bring prayers against granting the claims of the Catho- ' cause of the Irish Catholics only, but of the whole
themselves to give utterance to that sentence be- tics? Where was the Petition of the City of people of the British Empire. It would be in yen
eagle it was insufferable, abominable, and unima- Lordon, the great capital of the empire? Where to employ the Church to raise its voice against it, in
ginable. Yet in the spirit of that sentence which I was the Petition from the. University of Dublin ? hurling the thunders of bigotry against the claims of
they durst not utter, they would deprive three-fourths ! What bad become of all those multiplied applications a nation. If even the House were disposed to coatis
IMPERIAL IMRLUMENT. of the population of Ireland of their civil rights and that were held out as likely to crowd the avenues, : nue for ever the present restrictions upon the Catho-
liberty, for adopting the religion which their con- I and besiege the walls of that House, and to lies, he would call upon them, at least, to go into
HOUSE OF LORDS, Aran. 29. sciences approved of. Let the house but recollect mock the calamity of the ceuntry by calling upon I the Committee, and take the subject seriously WO.
HORTIIWICK PEERAGE. that Ireland was the country of Catholic petitioners Parliament to defend us against the Pope and ' consideration, when, perhaps the discussion ofit might
Their lairdshipt nittatabout three o'clock, in a Committee' • • •
of Privileges, and beardayttheate at the Bar in support of the • —that their religion ens their property—that the' the Seven Sacraments? Where were all those . lead to some suggestion to mitigate its presiure.--
rlaimantto the Itorthwick Peerage. when the further consider- tenets of the Gospel Mere the right of all mankind numerous Petitions that wore to pray, that House' It was scarcely necessary for him to remind the
ation was postponed to Tuesday next. Their Lordships then —that the revelation was the gift of God to man—lto continue the disqualificatiqiis against the Ca- House, how much national honour was concerned in
adjourned.
At half-past four o'clock, prayers being evert the Lord given for the regulation of his conduct, and to be in- I tholic, and, under colour of seeking public secs- ! the adoption of this course—how-much the honour
Chancellor seated on the Woolsack, and several Peers in their terpreted according to that understanding whichProvi- I city, to promote the ends of separation ? Where 'Of a certain quarter was interested in the solemn
places, ;
dance had bestowed on every individual of the human i were the Clergy, who were to have raised their voices ' consideration of this question. He could not forget
Mr. Kingston, from tbe India House, presented tbe annual ,
documents, agreeably to the orders of their Lordships. • race. The Irish Catholic had a right to appeal to his' against this question, and uttered their disapploba- ' the period of 1789, when the subject of Regency
anldesr:i SHwEFElyttleppreseortnotsid a Pe,tintionnflrcr the Merchants fits God according to his conscience, without a licence i firm of entertaining it iu a mauner that would have' was first contemplated—he could not forget what
employed in the East ladle Trade, not dot, pr
built in Eitglanids, from the King ; but in the discharge of his duty here strikers the country to its very centre ? Where were : partiality, what affection, what kindness was shown
should not be registered es the mpany's ships.-Ordered to on earth, and in the hope of salvation in Heaven , those Clergymen who were to have denounced the on that remarkable occasion to favour the claims of
lie on the table. hereafter, Parliament, no more than the King, had fist step towards the concession of the Catholic ' that quarter—hecould not forget, with what cordials!
ale Lushltigton, Sir J. Graham, and others, from the Com-
mons. brooght up the Irish Tobacco Excise Duty Dmahaik, not any right to interfere. If they did interfere, ' Claims as a direct attack upon the Constitution in 'it y these proofs of the attachment of the Irish legis-
leer Glut Unties Regulation, the Vauxhall -Bridge Amendment, they would be guilty of tyranny. and the grossest Church and State; and instead of preaching the du-'. lature and people were then received. He could not
PA . O'Nellfs Indesoni,v, the Gold Coin, the Highgate Arch-
way Amendment, the Irish Malt Distillation, the Commons
violation of their public duty. He would allow, ow- , of charity and peace, to inculcate the principles forget t
' • Idh 1 ties authority upon which the Catholics were
Alruetaben' Oaths, and a multitude of other Bills, chiefly pvl- ever, that if the exercise of religions worship should ;of religious intolerance, having their pulpits hung eneoura ed to look to that guider for protection and
e, amounting to thirty-seven, all which were 'read the first ,in any degree affect the loyalty of the subject, or tend i round with the emblems and banners of Ecclesiastical :favour. Here, indeed, would have been a worthy
time.
Upon the reading of the Commons' Members Oath's Bill, the to weaken the obligation of allegiance, than the State I prostitution ?—[hear, hear !]—How different was . subject for gracious predelictions. ' He could not for-
LORD(.t Co
UANtCliletiOß intimateda an obrectioo, which oc- would have a right, as it would be its duty, to inter- i the conduct of the Protestant clergy upon this occa- get the frequent and authentic. intimations given to
present
efitnhmeresto re
"'re Partiriumlttrly oefierravabseil%atbat Ibyhictlirle shofere. But this intereference would not be justified ' sion ? Instead of demeaning themselves in this ex- ; keep alive the hopes and expectations of the Catho-
Bill, persons might be allowed to vote for the election of a nit tee ground of religion, but of the disallegiance.— travagant manner, actuated by the gloomy spirit of•' lict, directing to what quarter to look for that pro-
Seeker before they were duly sworn. In this case, however, there was no such ground for ' bigotry, they had sheen a degree of moderation, and 4 tection to their . interest, and that zeal in their cause
lord KING moved, for an account of the sum of the Unkind- I
ed Debt, during the last twelve years, specifying tile se to interference. They were all agreed unanimously as to , a feeling of decorum, which reflected the highest ere- .which were, in the fullness of time, to heal the divi-
amount of eack year's debt.-Ordered. the allegiance of the Irish Catholics. They were allac- ' dit upou their profession, and was strictly in unison ! sions of Ireland—to redress the grievances of the
IRISH DISTILLERIES. . .
quainted with the contents of The. Gt a:cite—their own' with the sound seise manifested by the people at large.: Catholics—to hold out a light in the wilderness, to
The Earl of I)ARNLEY, after calling the attention of their
Lortl6hips to a mottos Which he had formerly made in the ore- Journal even testified, by the Totes they recorded tothe So far, therefore, from the table of the House being : guide a distressed nation to the condition of harmony
'PetiTpsessiosetouo , rveseper Isethe Irish Distilleries, gave notice or his., valour and loyalty of the Irish people, and the Ito- ' borne down by the mass of Petitions against the Ca- ; by the spirit of conciliation and grace. He could as•
waasfttyed.r
at:l-lei:a eztaleacrittgaztjif the Grain
consumed, or raja n curable approbation of a. grateful Parliament.— tholics, from their Protestant fellow subjects, they i sure the House, that there was a strong feeling of dig-
viously wasted by the distillers in tat countr'y • since the :teat; [Hear, hear, hear n Yet with all this abundance of had the Petitions of thousands, and tens of thousands content, a lively sense of disappointment in Ireland
the former motion, to which he referred. ' r
proof did they every day hear imputations thrown of the Protestants of England in their favour, lying , upon this subject. Bet the disapeeintment was not
Earl BATHURST moved, that the Gold Coin Bill he read
trove ',coil(' time next Tuesday, and that their Lordships be slllll- out against the loyalty of the Catholics, which must : before them. These Petitioners felt no apprehension , new—it bed prevailed ever since the Union. When
mooed act:o4) rtlinxiy._.ordiered . •, be -known to be false. These statements, so un- 'at the grant of the prayer of the Catholics—they had i that measure was carried, the removal of the Catholic
their i eetees then adjourned to to-morrow (this day). founded in fact, and so dishonest in principle, actu-; no objection to Irish Claims because thee felt themes ' disabilities was promised. It was by the promise of
ally made the mischief upon which they fed. In 'be English objects. .But, besides all this, they bad: that removal that• the Union was gained. If the
what other light could accusations be considered, i the Petition of the Protestants of Ireland, in favour ! expectation. of Catholic Emancipation had not been
which represented the Irish Catholics as deficient in of the claims of their Catholic countrymen upon their i held out, ow Union could have been carried. As
loyalty, as necessarily indisposed to any Prince of , table. At the head of the list of these Petitioners, he ! that. measures had taken away its Parliament from
the House of Hanover? As if there was something found the name of Mr. feetouche. That Gentleman ! Ireland; the Irish Catholics naturally looked-up to
in the nature of their religious doctrines, or in the . had heretofore voted against concessions to the Catho- ! the Imperial Parliament to give them their qualifica-
constitution of them, utterly irreconcileable with , lics,and, now came forward in their behalf, not from a ' tion. This was the understanding that made the
fidelity to their lawful Sovereign. But this was an feeling of party, or any ititissence of connexion, but; measure of Union succeed ; and the first conse.
abortive calumny, which scarcely, reached the light ' because lie was convinced in his conscience that the; quance of that. Union, because the first principle of
ere it died at its birth. Another charge against the: removal of the remaining disabilities from the Ca-! its supportot as `expected to be the relief of the great
Catholics was, that the Pope had the power to die- 1 tholics would most essentially promote the good of . body of the Cetholics. He did not mean to contend
solve the allegiance of subjects to their sovereigns— ' the State. The whole course and character of I that the letter °Seim measure justified such an ex-
that the Catholics were not bound by their religion that Gentleman's public life, was a pledge of the pectation, bet timprestionably the honest and ho-
to keep faith with persons of a different persuasion, integrity of `his motives and objects on this question. nourahle construltion of its spirit did most fully.—
and that the Protestants and Catholics, in couse- ' He had invariably diveeted.hls efforts to whatever his If character be streneth, and the high name of Eng-
quence, could never amalgamate.. The monstrous; sound judgment pointed out to him, as likely to be land enabled her to surmount a.host of difficulties,
absurdity of these charges was such, that it was un- : conducive to the public good, without suffering his in tie name, then,.of that honourable fame and ex-
necessary to enter into a refutation of them. These • conduct to be influenced by the smiles of the Court, abed character, he Called upon the House to attend ,
were demonArably false, from the utter impossibili- or the flattery of the populate. Ile bad uniformly to-the prayer of the Petitions on their tattle.; end to
ty of their being true.. If they could be true, there consulted the best Interests of his country! Mike ie. , remove from the Catholics all the disabilities under
would have remained no Christianity in Europe. Had ..dependent of the Crown and the people, and resol- ! which they seer...still labouring. if they should re.
they been true, every:4loe in Europe, where Chris- ved to maintain 'the integrity of hfs public lire and 1 fuse tile testitioners, they tvcrukl, In effect; repeal
tianity hid beep pe efemeed, would have fallen into a character. to the laste he had given his swore to the Union. if,. by the vote of rejection, they
• .• • . .• ~ , - , . -. ' - 4-!:5.: ..., es
. - . - :.
•-. • . -
. '
. , ..
-
•... • - . '
. -
.•• . . -
;•- .- ....,: .. • , -..e e 3 -,.7."'•; .r." •""' .!:-.°' -•.-!•,..10.4. 4;2 :.:" .' .- 's
- .
-
- .

Onlg 11.000 Ticket.. all different Number.. The whole to
he dries mined in One My. the 90tb of THIS MONTH. April.

HOUSE OF COMMONS'.
Coltmel ODELL presented a Petition from the Roman Catho-
he iahabitants of the County and City of Limerick, pray iag
repeal of the Penal lawn.—Read and ordered to lie on thetable:
Sfr: DEN BOWES DALY presented a Petition from the
Rosman Catholiet of the County of Galway, to the same effect.—
/teed sod ordered to lie on, the table.
On the tow ion or the CHAN CELLOR of fin- I Ii.CHEQUER,
the names of the defaulters on the call of the love yesterday,
were read ever, several of the absentees ordered to attend on
Mandel, next, mad others encased.
Mr. WI Ll' AM ShiltH presented a Petition from the Pro-
lestuut itissrutlog Ministers of London and Westminster, pray-
ing the repeal of the Penal Laws against all religious sects what-
Meter.

ri
I

iii:SHEIIIDAN also presented a Petition from the Roman j
Catholics of the County of Wexford, which were sere ally read i
and ordered so lie on the table,
Sir JOHN NEWPORT postponed his motion for documents
respecting May:a:mill College to this day stonnig:d.
Mr. RANKLS brought up the Third Report of the Committee
ea Sinecure Places, which was ordered to lw printed.
CATHOLIC YU FAT lON.
Mr. GRATTAN) rising to call the attention
of the Ileum to the matter of 'the numerous peti-
lions upon its table, observed, that, its con%equeuce
of what had fatten from Ginatlemea is the tlitrefot


:~.~:

,
-tttiNitairl./ T %
.1
t
eiti'- :40 /* t.
, • . .
401 44 '....
• •
4 _
• •?-It4r.;k ' '''' ' .I_,
i•)•icrifivit ‘.4 . ,
- ... ',!:=Z: Y••• ,v-S.; .
. • . .
• . . . . . :.• 4. ,
- . . .
i •
I.(i_t. "i.e...4;".•
.. . . i .
_ .
; -
• - • - 1 i !.
. , ---, -. , • -
• - - :r SI
• I
, .4
.1. . •
.. . .„ .
• • ..i, :
.1.:._ 7 t (
•
~..
• 4
t .., .
ra) 11 v t.-_ i • 0
_
-^- k t ' morbialli=
• .
_
APRIL

• ' •
4 ,
k
•
•
•
A ti• 4
a
•
XI" 'I
,••
t
•
•
t°
ie
le
11
)f .
to.
la
ar
in
et ;
• !;
at /r"!
ra
•
of
ot • .• .
•
r :
to r
0-
0- • lot i
BC
rj.
he • 1,
to
3.
9-
rd •
•
of