The Statesman.
London, England, 1818-04-28 00:00:00

' `:4 -

certainly be more advantsgeonsly discussed
tare occasion. No particular jealousy of
eters witit excited respecting the use of pe:.
appointing Commissioners: but in the precedent

Bill had co ntained the rumination of the
sinners. He did not mean to say that,

13111,, a-Cormirito should be
_proposed
of the Iloosti TAW' than by soother: but
sly that we 01011000.4.--

who was not wade of materials able and sr i

proposty
divided into thee per% so :that each Coo._
Might set by himseff,lied that not one of thiM
b**elPher. That sioold.. be the bast wey.t
thee meseere effectual detecting abase, • 'Fh.
Meet ha& heard the in Berkshire alone the fend,
for thee charities amousted to 20,0041. a year,
whervers only WOOL a year found its wet 4w She pee.
prises it.'was intended for. Fifteen tiewatid poundit',
a. Jean were *belly unaccounted foe; secueding .1a I
at* erptirtatidit. To show the insol,leiency of o#'
Act wrdOksag retiree, the amount was, staked ist wW,
pearit lacrosse than 70001. It was worthy of-ob.
slOtiPlit.ll,llolthe,,otrict swig which was instl.
W ;two Imre ego, bad Ise& the beneicial af ect. as
eetellerl Iselbasievekoloatertalned the gemitestaversion
*ifs fasil,itietieg ill theta sespicions:o4der which
eaawy.'oll time public establishments previously la-
bnirrlid. %chit result Satisfactorily proved. that there
was no ground for entertaioing that dread of investi-
istkpumhich wesermeirees exhibited by. thee bodies.
liir JOHN NEWPORT observed, that similar pb.
Straimstbali Iteeniaretd when he firm moved, for an
enquisy ietre.the.bres ditsnatidad:lo ceurt•te of 'retie-
Tbe..prearcuelon of 'bet eiugulryi!bowswer, 1110 pro-
-404 none of the incnovepiences
hneiled. It bad , sepporsotl, pr viola state-
niPulfriqud my coesidursible sticentage bed attended
Spabl ties ottlinCommisaionere Rawls,
„Me. P.EgLadmitted that the proposition to which
theilen. Member alluded bad heen,,productive of
greitiwivimt•gei bet observed that it was in the form,
of on Address, praying that the crown would sp.,
poiltt Commissioners• for the purpose, of making the
desired enquiry.. lie theater', the. IffenourabAe and
IsPerned Gentlemse unfortunate in adducing as a
milieu for instituting an enquiry, nto the Admini-
-94141i011 of the Ueiversities,,in ;ss hich no ebuse was
alleged, the institutioe of a similar enquiry into the
Administretien of, the Charter-house, in which great
abuse had. been alleged,
,The Order of, the :pay was then read. On the
motion that ,the Speaker should leave the Chair, a
short discussion ensued, in which Mr. B4THErs6r,
Mr. UI4OIGIJAM, and Sir J. NEWIPOINT participated.
,The Motion was then agreed to, .the Rill .passed
throegli,the Committee, apd the Haase hewing re.
wined. the, Report was received, end ordered to be
taken into further consideration on Thursday. The
1341,1 asrereended was ordered to bb printed.
—Sit CIIAIILES SAXTON presented a Petition
from the Magistrates of Abingdon, in Berkshire,
nib(' mere Trustees of-certain Charitable Imo Ream's,
complahning of various calumnious misrepresentations
toot had been made respecting the manner in which
their trestthad been discharged.
Mr. BROUCHAM repeated that what be had
Said on that suhject had been completely misrepre-
easter', *lid contended that the Prtitieners bad no
riebt to assume thrum misrepresentations as having
bye. the actual statements made in the Heys*.
; Afrer a short conversatioe.bet ween Mr. WILOTTES•
LET, Mr. 11.vritvasz, Mr. BROUGNAM, and Mr.
NV,vole„ Sir C. SAZTON withdrew the Petition.
• 0o the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the
ENC/11 ..111ER, the further consideration of the
Report of the Clierchee' Bill was postponed until
to-morrow. .
__. • COTTON. FACTORIES..
Sir R. PEEL prefaced his Motion, that the House
Factories
itself into. a Committee on the Cotton
Factories Bilf, by obseriing, that about 16 years
ego,. he hell brought in a Bill fur the protection of
apprentices in those factories, whose masters were
tnevertheless hound to protect them ; the present
measure was to protect' ittle children who hail no pro-
tectors, although he hoped that they would meet with
perolectors in that House. These little children were
compelled to labour in the Cotton Factories 14 hours
,jet, the day, aim exertion to which their strength was
4111,4 unequal, and which in a few years generally
'destroyed them. Numerous Petitions had been pre-
sented to Parliament praying that that time might be
shortened, and more especially one from Manchester,
proceeding from persons wholly uninterested, except
from motives of humanity ; among which persons
were 39 medical men, and el clergymen. Indeed,
he believed the number even of master spinners who
were in favour of the Bill exceeded the number op-
posed to it ; and, indeed, were anxious that its pro-
visions should he extended to adults.
, Lord STANLEY rose and said, it was true that
several Petitions had been presented by medical men,
and other respectable persons, but those Petitions
ought not to be deemed conclusive. This was a case
that involved a very material question, and it deserv.
ed the most serious consideration of the House.
Abuses had certainly existed in the Cotton Manufac.
• tories, and, with a Tie* to remove them, the
. Barone! (Sir R. Peel) had introduced his farmer bill.
But the 13,111, now before them stated, that that Act
hail become insufficient for its purpose. In what, he
would ask, was it so defective ? In what way had it
proved le bests ineffectual ? Had this Bill been con-
fine:l to the regulation of apprentices, he should_ not
have had any objection to it ; but as it went trle-
.terfere with free labour, he objected to it most
, etron ty. , lie knew of no 'precedent in the laws of
,tlgii civet!), fee the edaption of nay such measure.
fie considered the principle of free labour to be in-
violable by, the laws ; but still he did not mean to say
that the Legislature had not power to make such provi-
eionetts,it.might dr.na most expedient for the regule.
Sims of a trade which was found to he injurious to
..bealth. But this was not a new trade ; it 61 d.trtl P
~
exerciaed for a great length of time; and i 4t. Would
acquire the most satisfactory evidence to show; that
. it affected the morals, or undermined time constitution,
.of those who were engaged is •'the ininissuli of.
age would have little effect, as the manufacturers did
not wish to employ persons of such tender years. But
if the-e children were not employed, their pareies.
could derive no benefit fraitt.theilabosr, conse-
quently, their means of providing for their families
must be considerably diminished. As to the genet al

mutt
stages that were vow ry, fox, ita Kreservations; while
iti#ave Ihem three foO institublion, It world . deprive
them of the meinti. "It Wray' hive thesiotrary o'l°
feet fs.mn tahattasacaotiaipited. It would
,increase
thwffifficeltiy*Wnder Whit!, the country laboured in
manufactstAft compare It other couptries. It
wooed offer a preasiums—to.mills..in particular situ.-
tiona. Mills worked by .st4not weak! !rave a great
advantage over those worked -hy Aster; ('here were
many instances In which it would be the ruin of la.
hour, and it would offer a premium to those establish-
mints that were situated in lyre towns. Under all
circum,tances, he should move, as an Amepdmeos,
'6 that the !louse do reaulre itself into the said Gine
mittee this day foes. months."
Lord LASCELLES said, the few words which bar
had to observe on the present question applied rixthe
principle of the measure itself. The principle on
ohicli they were proceeding was this—they were
going ou to regulate every branch of trade in the
tratintry, and to lay down what degree of labour
'ought to be performed by the individual workmen in
the different trades. Any person standing up in that
ffeuselo oppose himself to what was called a ques-
tion of humanity, was almost sure to be run down;
but he would say, on the principles of humanity, let
the Hnuse be cautious how they proceed to regulate
free labour. These who hive embarked capital in
any branch of trade, were bound to look about them
to see.what was coming after. If the effect of the
Bill .would be to prevent the employment of children
under•l6, then these children would be thrown on
their parents, and übimately the parish. It was
nonsense to say, that if the children were not em-
ployed in factories they would be employed in edu.
cation—they would, in most cases, remain in 'a state
of idleness. The Bill gave a direct advantage to the
factories in populous towns. Out of 16 Manufac-
tories in one little district in Yetkshire Witt which he
was acquainted, 15 of them were on sereams of
water. The Member for Coventry had said the other
evening, that the mode of employment in factories
produced a deteriorated population—that the men
brought up in them were unfit for soldiers or sailors.
But if this was the fact, discard these trades alto.
gether, for the deduction of one hour from the usual
hours of labour would not be sufficient. The blow
must be aimed at the system itself. Ile might there.
fore suppose diet this was but a commencement,
which would be followed op by other measures. If
he had thought this measure originated with the Hon.
Baronet (Sir It. Peel), he should have considered it
entitled to • very (different share of attention ; but
the fact was, it did not originate with him ; it ori.
&bated with a person well known from the Public
Prints. One of the projects of this individual was
the rendering Cotton Factories a perfect school
of morals and education ; and it was his opinion,
that by reducing the number of hours, you increased
the quantity of work done; an opinion which he
could not well understand. Ile could not help
thinking that the measure originated with Mr. Owen;
and that the first Committee and subsequent measure
were got up by him. The House owed it to a very
large body to institute an enquiry before they le-
gislated on the subjects. He believed the ex-parte
statements to be incorrect, particularly in the in-
ferences drawn from particular facts. He would not
be a party to a vote for a Committee, if he thought a
Committee would necessarily defeat the measure; but
when he said a Committee of Enquiry, he meant an
enquiry with regard to the health of the children.—
Some things might he wrong in Cotton Factories ;
but were they sufficient to induce them to legislate
between parent and child He should oppose the
Motion for the Speaker leaving the Chair, unless On
an understanding that they should go into a Com-
mittee upstairs.
Mr. PEEL said it was unnecessary for the Noble
Lord to assure the House of the sincerity and
candour of his views, as these were sa matilfeat as
that his humanity was unquestionable.—[llear,
hgar !]—He begged leave, however, before he en.'
tiered into the general question, to object to one or
two of the allusions of the Noble Lord, which had
a tendency to impress upon the House a prejudice
,against the Bill, on the ground that it had the
support of a Gentleman (Mr. Owen) who local-
cated certain speculative opinions on subjects of
political economy. There was no strength in such
an argument—fur, if true, it only went to this,
that a whole subject should be merged in the indis.
crcet views of a particular Advocate. Against such
a doctrine he would protest, and maintain, that
the question must rest on its own merits, and not on
any adventitious support. The Noble Lord required
further documents to throw • light on the subject,
and, therefore, called for a Committee. In answer
to this call, he (Mr. Peel) would only say—not that
other documents may nut throw a light on the sub.
jut, but had not the already before it enough
to establish the necessity of adopting this Bill ?
[lleac!]—But he aotad not rest the merits of this
question on the general evidence in its favour ; he
would be content to rove its efficacy, on the state-
ments of these who were its opponents, and to their
observations he would chiefly canfine his comments.
From these it was quite clear a great gt ievauce had sub-
_siated—a grievance Which it wits most desirable to re-
move, irit could be done without a coutravention of
public principle. The opponents of this tweesore
may, tie iliVided into two classes—one of which was
ueasible.of tbe great evil of excessive labour upion,fhts,
constitution of childr7o, but who were still unwilling.
to establish a principle of interference, which may be
mirtiedgiroufair. The second class denied the grim.
mice altogether, and resisted any Legislative inter-
position. Witt* respect to the first class, he was at a
loss to see how it caul) be ntsintaitted that u princi.

of lie fe.clinita weresobject, sod the mode take_
brine-rig 'op`the wear of Inanufncture, 'by making
the child /We wdtk op the lost time by se excessive
apppcitidwisf,reitra hours on the Nada dill's of
work. Addid.le OW operation of thii titre tabour,.
was the heated atmosphere in which she children
were obliged' to work,and the degree of feTperature
in which they were kept for holdiag tkiairrearls, In,
particular branches of the matarfaeturise:if the sail
were a small one, then Legialative. ipterftesltirin may
be uusieceasary, on the maxim, tdt minima nun cural
her, }rut here thearvil seas risorfearilty great,, for in
Mtierchester alone no less their 11.400childrett were
employed in' this fade. Zissriblerble bard had oh.
jetted to any interposition,, on tho`grotind that it
would alter the relations between the parent and the
child, the child and the master, and affect that ar-
rangement of free labour, or, as he aftertiardp'qoall•
fled it, by saying, " what was called free labour."
Lord STANLEY here explained, 'that it was cali-
.
ed free labour, thougkf itswas in fact at the command
of the parent.
Mr. PEEL restated, 11 that t)le-tirronenes
conclusion of the Noble (Weld' ,was thii--41tat he 19p3-
posed there was no chance, no medium between the
employment of the children for a period of 14 or
hours a day, or their actual discharge from work ak
together.-4 /fear, hear !]--It was alto said that
there was a greater interest in the rare of-rbildren
thus employed, than if they were in the fiends Of
masters as apprentices. Ile Mr, Pep) ) wan of
quite a differeot opinion, tor 'lie 'pastel-Mid anfin-
terest in preserving the health of,isie apprentice,, par•
titularly during his early years, fist he Was'bound so
to apply his time, as to prevent his being a burden
upon him by indisposition or .othereise during the
subsisting engagement it was imperative upon him to
maintain —but in the factories. tOe teimsAf engage-
ment was either daily or weekly, and theproprietor,
in case of illness or accident. had *limy, sithenel-the
means of replacing the person dischargq..,heels d
commenced with stating, that he wopld pike out a
case from the statement' of the .opponents of the
measure. The partner of the lion. Memekr opposite
(Mr. Phillips) had slid before the Chminkee that the
Bill bore harder on the factories in the wentry than
on those of Manchester, for the latter " were nearer
the market for labour." What was thir but flying,
that hands might always be obtained by the manufac- '
turer with facility, and therefore there existed no ne.
cessity of his relaxing any part of that system under
which so many were willing to act ? Substitutes
were thus easily had for the sick or the weak child,
end no very great inducement was held out to show
the necessity of restricting the hours of labour.—
Look, then, in the case of the accidents to which these
mills were liable, and the consequent practice of
making up for lost time in the erode of pursuing the
business when the machinery was again put in mo.
lion, and the House must be at once struck with the
severe duties imposed upon, children. If, as has
been said, the consequence of this Bill will be that
the masters wilt supplant the children by the employ.
meta of adults, then it is clear that the former are
merely retained for their labour, and that the interest
of the master was not, as had beets asserted, a suffi-
cient security for the treatment of the child. Besides,
what security was there that the factories would not
relapse into the system of bad management from which
they. had emerged ? What security was there that if
Parliament withdrew its interference, the arrange-
ments of these establishments would net again fall
into that irregularity and oppressive distribution of
labour which previously chat acterized them? The'
number of hours during which children were em.
played at these factories, appeared, from the evi-
dence of the proprietors themselves, to vary, on an
average, of from twelve to fifteen hours each day.—
In one manufactory at Manchester, which employed
600 persons, 374 of them were under 18 years of
age ; and when they considered that 11,600 children
were thus employed in one town, it was an argu-
ment, a priori, without any reference to the other
parts of the subject, that, from the mode of labour
pursued, the injurious consequencea to the health
of the children must be manifest. That they had a
right to work,and to work hard for their subsistence,
was what he did suet mean to deny. That a large
proportion of society must earls their bread by the
sweat of their brow, was what might appear bard to
the philanthropist, though the piilnsopher must
think it necessary ; yet neceacary as it was in the
state and condition of society, it was yet incumbent
on the Legislature to see that that system of over-
working was not applied to the infant race, which
paralysed their future exertions, nod deprived them
of all fair and useful recreation. In the evidence
before the Committee, Mr. Sandford had quoted the
Returns from the Sunday Schools, for the purpose of
contrasting the superior appearance of the children
employed in the factories with those in other employ.
ments; they attended more regularly than the other
children, were cleaner and more orderly. But then
came the part of the explanation to which lie (Mr.
Peel) begged to direct the attention of the House—
" the children of the Cotton Factories were in as
pod health as the others, though they did not look
as asell."—(Hear, hear!)—it was also said, "they
came as early to school as the other children, except
in some of the evenings of the winter months."—
This explanation afforded room for much considers-
.tion. Was it tint disgusting to see that education,
"which was calculated as the greatest of blessings, was
converted into a curse by this mode of compelling
the children to try and avail themselves of it, after
the exercise of thirteen hour" and a half of close la.
boar, when, throlighout the day, labour had drained
from them every spring of action' that could refresh
their faculties, and beuustbed that elasticity of mind

the"
A
sip. by , 244 Uergymeo.,
In answer to the allitkitierti ot,"ihdlnferences homy;
this Petition, the Noble Lord. said he 'would grant
was lgtied by one Gentleman' of great respectability,,
but of io,easy a disposition, and over compassionate,
temper, that he might readily be prevailed upon nil
lend 'the sanction of his name to any document of dig;
description. It was in this manner the Noble Lott
endeavoured to shake the testimony of a name se'
elevated and respected. The Noble Lord was conk
pelted to acknowledge that tie Legislature had al.
ready acted on the principle of interference with (mg,
labour, as it is called, in the instance of the chimney.
sweepers. He had incised afterwards [abort:44o'
establish a distinction, by which that case woodbe
taken nut of the general principle; bat he bad talkei
—be wasmistaken in his opinion—his opposition ese
toe late. The Chimney Sweeper's Act, said OM,
Noble Lord, altogether abolished, this Diligently
regulate, a certain species of labour for children.: lh
surely the Noble Lord must confesethat an Act which,
absolutely prohiNts the employing of children In say
occupation is a far mete violent inteiretence wu
free labour than one which only limits it to a limited
period —vievett hours, for istample.—(fkor!)=.The
Noble Lord had expatiated on the oewholesorneame
of atmoephere, and misuses, of temperature, tbea
tPrevllibleedlievined7olf 6t°7l the ll.miFragn ip ( fragrant .*Otesn-ni
if hat star
ra ben the Blab

a cotton7esill carried away thep—Fa n--aisair
deuce cm which the'Noble Lord..velie wire tibt4le
should not have 'stepped whekt be•ilid—he ought
to have Meted' aa• an assimakeeist that itilldgissilif
should be erected on' etwey spot litodse kintdOm.
'A principal. part of that Oboe., Was, that In thd
'establithment at Glasgow, in which- as Hos. Gee,
Ileums opposite (Mr. Finlay) had a shire, the avers.
age number of labourers, for each .of three years;
1811, 12, and 13, amounted to about 4404, while
that of the sick belonging MO the ,establishinent,' dui.
ing the same portions of time, was bat two., NI
this showy statement was unluckily very mock
shaken by mast' respectable *widener of a conker,.
nature—that of Dr. Diane. His remark On it was,
that he had paid particular attention to the mini
proportion of the tick to the rest of the community.
Its England he had calculated it to be on the aver.
age as One' to fifty-four, and was quite surprised
to find a plice esempted from lbw mortality-prem.
lent in all other places itii the Celerity. On this it
lied been ohserved, that certain places might he
more conducive to health than others. Sir Gilbert
Wane replied, that in Cardiganshire, considered
the most healthful situation its the kiegdom, the
average was 1 in 74; and he could not reconcile it
to himself, that. in a Cotton Factory, the ratio was
so low as Ito 404. One of oar Poets had said--
" to what ranuotaia's craggy cell
Delight* the goddess Health to dwell?"
Where she dwelt was now no longer a secret.--.
Another, a laureat, had asked—
In what rim retreat
. The coy Nt mph fixed her tarmsed seat r'

. .
and be did think he watt& have heard with surprise
that she had fixed it in the cotton-mill of Messrs.
Finlay and Co. at Glasgow. [flear, hear! and
ouch laughler.]—Abaadatice of evidence to show
the necessity of the measure bad been already dis-
closed in the numerous petitions presented. If any
more was required, he would refer the House to the
pro Feedings (of which he had in his hands a Report)
of two Meetings held by the Masters of these establish-
ments, at Ashtint.under. Line : at the first of these,
it had been unanimously resolved, " that it is the
opinion of this Meeting, that it is become highly !m-
-emory to limit the hours of labour in cotton and
other mills;"—and in the second, it had been so
unanimOos resolution, "that the time should be re-
duced to twelve hours." Here were proceedings ors
the part of the masters thinnest's% admitting the pro-
priety of interference by the Legislature, and the
ground alleged for the resolutions they had came le
was, that they did not find that the limitation of Is.
bout by the master* bed produced the bad elects
once apprehended from it—hut then they added, that
they done could not do this, because the parents,
and some of the children themselves, would prefer
factories where the time of working was fourteen
hours on account of the additional wages; but if the
House would make the reguletioti general, so far
from objecting to it, they • wopld hail it with joy es
an important boon. The evidence of the interested
and disinterested led to the conclusion, that Parlia-
ment might ~afely apply the principle of limiting the
period of labour to cotton-mills.
Mr. PHILLIPS said, it was difficult to contend
with feelings of humanity, hoverer injudicious, or
to alley prejudices which so much pains had been
taken to excite. The cotton-spinners, whose bed.
nest; was to he regulated, had much of this Olio•
dice to contend with, which had been created oy
envy. The manufacturers of piece-goods itnegitted
that the export of cotton-yarn wee injurious to
them, and Imagined that if the prodactiteues of the
cotton mills were diminished, thiseeportation would
he prevented. There were some spinners who being
themselves also manufacturers of cotton goods, were
subjected to this prek dice. Some spinners also ern•
ployed apprentices, who were now under the reguls•
tion of en Act of Parliament; and they, conceiving
they were thus disadvantageously situated, in comp.-
Hum of those who employed free labour, wished to
reduce the latter to their own condition. 41 was
rieteasery to mention these facts, to account for the
Petitions which had been presented in favour of the
13i11; anal when it was also taken inttiecconnt, how
easy it was to procure signatures to soy ,Petilino
which purported to We for an increased ',Ages and a
rcducti.,ll of the hours of labour—how clay it 010

~ - •• - - _ ~ -.
.1. • - .
.... .
„..
'---• . . .
' .
--A • 0 '
Tilt; SrisikTESNIA N. J, ). ' . • ..\
~1 0........ -7'". a
on a fu. opini , at.t cotto if e w pot so be .--.-
al ple ap I t • pe, cular evil could be l‘ketlorepo ti' which could' excite *ens in the pursuit of study ?....
gEej
t c tarff.iiifsf' v ittep:p n letter cases wprir eII did! not 'Vias i' nut disgust a' see them thus tra armed
.
'nciple wilts 1( ut precildent after 13 or 15 hours t our, A cejtlitid an*:
f the Mini- to hdpWlr
atronage in that •$4 • co hr , I se h
•Isqkft#o the pr • lila* ID t
wltthrv. tv. n‘rdy p! ad• tv .Oo o rict, for it, was na tipacted the hands of a writin .matter ? tirv.,,, 4444
tcedent, the tOe'imi•
la Commis- but he would-say poisonous, in its tattile, in o der on II c mer - guiations where . tar eacep- who worked fifteen h rs, possibly not one resided
under this 1nna15k441118.114141111-44004‘11111._. -I1 • -- t h e tatttradirjgara9tices called
_ in the mills ; many of them were obliged to cow*
._ _ •
by one side This Bill,-wlialits ("mimeo ..niefaapo Trjralvintu , . pikirr •ottettef. Isiow;-dirfotton- rrom the distance of a mile, aid the time so takft
important advantages to ilhete. cloak's). Itlibitibe li 1 slich idretibitilitittot is railed for the ap- up was to he added to that of their et
at he would.
satitrAibe ow:Llairitia_ta _their. _egtoutia
,L iicktimotivisAm.w.R.eibot,et itAtioi_ll,d for ill themill.—(llear, hear!)—ile woutitiLlt
rifling to go went directly to'teke
Holio uwiy,wouille'rAttlitcpolfriar :`9 , aireity'On-Fraiircaril:N4ic intlenae bultdfltafftt to the cotiiton set el
as might]) their profits. ile.was very vorrit 'ailelild'aetiln.; many of s‘filtit more thin 'hit rein were kept at admit—he wanted no evidence to prove—it was ha-
Dmmissioner
-tract io TiinTeiiiidie- hoped ifill There" tiara'
-*ll-rll7l2;ltiiiitadiitelilitirdT3ho-nrs erda=titear!] posvittle that it wet -eertoieitet to iho {rarea
them should ean opportAitigtvhd tozi host to elpliiitVlso were ' o diiAndlidn bein made'hetween,thei cHild..of the this 'great sod nourishing. country tflittlnafh•
psy
.to ins *a rich better acquainted Itllirthe subject than himself. I epdtKtplytekifilliq rtat,giriten; or betweensjehe inn- mows labour should he elected, of nest, tir:ll
IN . iFka,, bile the Bill:piettfided'•liPpioltkfrfiebialth of the 1 ecile an t .e,strit'oit.. Jie Ilsuse would also bear lit. thetesand children iii one town, But baying,.
to the fond,' iehittlivirOt -*dela saki away from'
ikon much of die I lod!,sibelfrequencysof accidents to whijch A/waling asked for evidence, he would refgr to, iholsoitivio, ,
__ ____..._. _— ..—..... r... t....-.........e1m,s- ...t,ti:" of the. factories were subject. and the mod! liken, for signed by 30 Medical Geotlenseo and 24 tle;gymeo: