The Statesman.
London, England, 1822-11-21 00:00:00

• f.".' . % .
......". . ; •
; . . , . • I
' . ,
4.7 •
....: . , i /
.
. 1
1 ' 7
.- 1 '
144 ...i.
..:....4
.
- 4 . •
t ° ' q
~ ,
-•
n„ .. ~. i. :- •.r" 4 • .
• i :- •• t's • ar I e
1. a
I ' ,1 - , • ' ',- ', 1 . •
' j f
.01 .
' ft •t' -
.
. . ..--...-1 * ~ i ''• '
td/" PRICK SEVEN lintell
..--....--....—....---.-..-0—...—e____„..,......_;--....L....—, „ " .-
• J.
pp. 20; his fithet bad before his death tikes out the Comedeekam of I t. f
Latisey against his son. - , 1
• The'holts Ortattent.t.ol thought it a most Important part
:e to his Vibe allidailt, where, In taking out the commission, the
aef. I r father tensed the limits hls heir. :
prayed Serie:nit Ilesamewee—That was set forth over and over
!moving
la saws *gala before the Joey. Adeerting to the eenceelitent of a,
•
the illegatbersey by dehisdant, he contended that the bead .i.
„mem ? sad bent of Ms eget:Wiwi was, that he did not Intone egalant• .
.ta. . his mother and aunts (the plelatira) and they were now the •
Plai?•;" persons who brought it forward as an orenee that might
explain & tloy.
' explain him of his estate for Ilfe. It operated
and de-
enough against himself: but he conceded the point, because
'
stiff had he would mot deprive them of their only maintenasee.
The de- Atter the Learned Gentleman had concluded his Lordship
tend, oe ruse, and thecae's was postponed sine die. . ,t
ill's bill _+_l': it
the di- COURT OF KING'S BENCH.- Wisratimsreu,Nov.2o.'
rout Pr; The Court were ea ged4lll near one o'clock fa boar-
ilia ..: t
receive
thee lice - '
Jac likatsratt oaths metier far a 41;'
aen the sew ti ais the Htb• cause of Dote v. W.isearusatwnsiile-at . .
•
'forming liege
lan. and Ouillsall4e, t,:nd the other Lorafi i jilit:dti;elisitooltiktohnel
y ordinary tuo.
tions,ard shortlfrose.Nothing occurred of atiOnterest to
nand of
the mane. It is Mill quite sincertain *ben the case of
"1"1/41 the Kiss v. William. will be beard.
the crew
kotwerr, --am— 1: ~
,n of this COURT OF COMMON PLEAS—WEDNESDAY.
led 5.000 DOS"* v. AAAAA TT.
t came to This was a special case, made out to have the decision
se. The of this Court, whether a person who contracted with a
nosey to coach proptietor to supply him with two additional
a had re. horses to aid in drawing his coach op a hilly road, was.
liable to the duty as on post berme..
remitted
ant now The Court was occupied the greater part of the day,
i another in hearing the arguments of" Mr. Serjeant Litres
n against against the liability pf the defendant, and of Mr. Serf' 1
u the de. jellieti Loss for it. , , .. I
using of Judgment was deferred to a future day. .
,
itatemant The following Rule of Court, which is of considers-
ludicrous ble importance, has been issued.— t
" To prevent unnecessary expense to plaintiff)ening -
1, or vier. in this Coml. is case of notices given by prisoners of
r the pro. their intention to apply for their discharge under any
, the ship Act made for the relief of insolvent debtors—
" It is ordered, that after such notice given to any
ship bad Piii*Sitt no prisoner stall be superseded or discharged
out of custody as the salt of such plaintiff, by reason
ns sworn of such plaintiffforbearing to proceed against him. ac-
&medium to the roles and practices of such Cone, from ?
dive evi. the time of each notice given 'nail some rule or order
g : —The shall be made in the Cense in their behalf by the Court, I
mod the or one of the Judges thereof I and it is furthered or.
the north \1• .4'
dered that a copy of this rule shall be hung up in the
he had usual pieces. 4 'II
R. DALLAS, J. BURROUGH,
.
rit be re- J. A. PARK., J. RICHARDSON." • 1
—........—. II further . •
PREROGATIVE COURT,Ii N0v.20. - - i i
~
to, of the CaCif V. TAILOR.
In this cause, which respected the testaasentarydispo. . t
shimmer • person deceased, who had when alive resided .
no doubt in Norsrieb, the judgment of the Court had bees 'lle- i
tit might Panda hp a enewst, entered by tl.e Archdeacon of the
ions that diocese, in which the testator's property was situated, on
I with the the ground that the will tell legally within his inferior
• 1
1
jerisdiction. This caveat bad been subsequently with.
incites be drawn and the question was still pending whether
the Archdeacon ought not to pay the costs of his in-
terference.
Sir J. Meow. remarked, that it was an unusual inter- •
pint the position to he made by a subordinate tribunal. As at
present advised, he felt himself under the necessity of _
.is motion decreeing costs against the Archdeacon. i
COATIS IP. artotrat.
ley would Dr. Ants applied to the Court in this cause, to permit
dy given his client, Mr. Coates, to be beard on his petition re- i)
"peeing his claims to the administration of the effects of
is quite of J• &Imo. deceased. He was a cqpsiderable creditor to
the estate, and a deed bad been executed between iii.ta
be defen- and the plaintiff, by which the latter bail re- i 1
ion of the pounced his claims to the office, as well as agreed t,"
sit might pay the costs of all former proceedings. The question
hint t but bad been carried to the Court of Delegates, and sent
participa• back there to that Court for its decision on the interine- 4,:
-.Ward of diate point. It could not fail to be seen that the whole 'I
permitted of this snit had now become a struggle between the two 11
edecessor, parties. as to the obligation of paying costs.
own that Dr. I.I.IIIIIINOTON "aid, that in opposing this estrum.
dinary application, he would beg leave to renal to the 1 '
swell took mind of the Court the distinguishieg facts of the case .
did. He
before it. The question was, who was best entitled to
went, but
administer the effects of the deceased ? Mr. Coates, a
1796, and Herefordshire attorney, and a creditor, or Mr. F. i;.
ited to the Brown, the son, and a creditor also, both by spvciality.
F kilt and and by simple contract. The deceased died in 1920, and , 1
Mr. Coates contrived gain possession will. The •
,who was
iimitt"..... possession be had since retained ; and, though a moni-
tion had issued from that Court, and although the case
when the i •
possession was decided against him, yet by means of a fruitless ap.
are was „ peal, and every species of vexatious and unjust delay, he
t was not bad hitherto evaded payment of the original costs. In •
e attended order to support himself, after the question with regard
it of kin. to Mr. Brown having died in po ion of bona eoratiad,
the to„. was determined in the affirmative, he found it necessary
„w
of it., to set up an indenture, to which he had succeeded in ob-
it, should mining Mr. F. U. Brown's assent, and by which, under sn 1
„t kw._ the name of a compromise. he proposed to accomplish all
motion for his machinations. By this deed, drawn op by his owe . .
whether he clerk, and as false in its recital as it was fraudulent in its I
rived mod, covenants, Mr. Brown, a Herefordshire farmer, was pre-
sly desired vailed on with two sureties, to bind himself in the penal
1 ....,
,
, sum of 51101. to pay not his own costs merely, but, the
aye °° "°° whole costs of a suit which had been decided in his fa- t
would eon- your. Could any man doubt that this was a fraudulent
ihe intend- transaction, or that it was not essential to the honour of .
notice, be the profession, that such practices should be restrained ?
his partici'. He would venture to a t that Mr. Coates would not
Id received venture to carry the deed in question either into Chan-
It was fitt-
cery, or any of the Courts of common law:
Sir J. Pitciso" observed, that the validity of the deed
a precedent now adverted to did not fall properly ',Won his knit-
PunitYr It diction. But he Was not therefore eycluded from taking . •
bed the At- cognisance of the principle on which Mr. Coates bad '
acted throughout these proceedings. It was marked by
I not inter- vexation, chicanery and delay; for from the first, he as a
or equity, professional man must have kosawn, that be bail no
see. with title in law to the office of administrator. He (Sir John
whether his
Nichol) therefore rejected Isis petition, and rejected it
Y the jury, wills coats.
. :
,? In sot" Fourni&" ABBEY.—Mr. trurdutiar having, thrones I
or-General his agent, Mr. Henry Pnillips, completed the purchase i
..,
ig kept me• of that mainiticent seat, fur 330.000/., which cost op-
tion of the wards of a million, he is now ilowo there. with the son
teeth of it of the Auctioneer, making out a catalogue of the varie-
"tits so sl-
ties preparatory to a sale by auction.—We hear that it is
of Rebecca the intention of Mr. Farquhsr to sell the estate, and that
thereof. three bidders an the market; Weed we may
15' deposed add • fourth, namely, the Duke of IVelliegtoo. Earl
robation of Grosvenor, Mrs. Coons. and the Marquess of Hertford.
he decision The latter Nobletu.n, when he saw it, said, "The King
es. the as. ought to occupy this plate, for no subject could live its
I stated that it. —(MorningPaptr.)