The Statesman.
London, England, 1822-05-01 00:00:00

STATESMAN.

eateries of Titus Oates. When they were looking at
the conduct of their forefathers, they should not permit
themselves to be diciited by reterence only to the acre
of (kites, but'to the erinduct and character Of those seh .
established that. relit itin, Imiql'te. the situation ander
which them eniibtiquditithey iad agreed in, took place.
I --(Hear, heir.) .11Y Ce:tifd" bast 'liiiirepected that insider
,einitld agree oh ilswiiiihkt. 4 Perry fact.
!'. • . " —e..TlQes willAital.emolems can, .
&Heeler& Roth-toe mid tielleeteg ad."
, A. muelt &Bullion, lied mode m that plot, he would ask
thq Heine ti take all tb,P..cirettutstances ander its contd.'deratioo. deratioo. Re 'Oaf iaaNy to etieehat it was a dune of
falsehood..l'il.there were. et ere, ,circunistances which'
operated upon the nation at that tint,. It seas a period
which Illscitstone had considered to be one of the greet-
is ,
I eat Constitutional perfection,: and which 31r. Fox had
Ahoracterizeil *lithe ere of good htwouil hail tiavernment.
—(lf,er, hetw.). le the, short space of eight years
Charles 11. by a dea;..ration, which appeared to be for.
the benefit of Dimentemi het which, in fact, was in-
tended for the ailvaritakee of the Monsen Pathoiics. hail
atteMpted t.; relax the Life against than. But the di..
sentera saw through [Tie-arglier. and refused to accept
any relaxation which would haye the effect of iuereasing
the power of the Roman Catholic's. He asked ,if
the House recollected the secret . treaty with Louie
XIV. which u as delailett in the letters of Coltuau in the
leers 1675; when i plan use arranged for destroying
that pestilent heresy, as it was called, which then isfect-
eil the mirth of Fliiitw. The letters of Colman stated
that the Duke of York was engaged in that plan. The
house should refer to these as well as to any other his-
torieal farts of that time. If .hey referred to a treaty
made in liii2, between Charles 11. anii.Lottis XIV , it
would find that the King of Great Britain was engaged
in the work of securing the lioniee Catholic iteligioo
and converting his subjects. One condition of the treaty
was, "It is therefore agreed that the King of France
shall furnish the sum of '200,01101., and further assistance
with troops and money, in case the subjects of the King
of England oppose him in his !plan fur the restoration of
Catholicity." Virus six learn before-the Act in [peados-
was passed a seeret article existed between these Monarchs
for the purpose of banishing the liberriee of this zoos.
try, and to extirpate the protestant religion. And this.
teasoll to he effected for half the tuna that iu the present:
defy was expended on die Caledoniau Canal. The it,lvi-
i errs to that measure were Lords Arondel. Clifford, and
I!Arlington, who were all Rumen Catholic., Peers. The
jealousy of the nation could nut be wondered at towards •
any advicegiven by those Peers. this Right Honour.
able Friend had attached inneli imeortance to an Act of
ilea 'Lords in 1673. HP was fir from arguing the house,'
of Curninons was not enti•led ro review anal alter at its
discretion any former Acts,. hut he. would lay that if
any Acts were sulfured to be permanent, it should be
thus* that accompanied the Bill of Rights; which were
celled for by the inteetione of James 11. to extirpate the
Established Iteligiun ; and which lied the effect of giving
to Ilse realm its distinct end Protestanteharacter. Them
fOrsogelente arose tenni the canduct of the Stuarts—front
the dangers which. threatened the liberties of the coon-
try foam Charles 11. end denies 11. The same great
men who bad conducted the Revolutioo; bad esteblielt-
' ed these priticiples, and which he trusted the Lain..
16.0t1111 routimie to recogoise and to cliferish. With re.
*pert to the argument of his Right Hon. Friend, as
. to,the adtuissibility of Hewett Catholic Peers to the Co-
ronation, he could only say that he was witting to allow
them every privilege diet was not imeerfaparible with the
Censtinatitim If they were told,they weave* be exchttird,
emir/4y omatoomossof their religheit;Tfi%• Mikiiirueily
twee been .disgriested. But if it wall explainia to them
that this was essentially a Protesting Constitution, but
altstetill there Wm -neetriiritTlini ideifiFildthe principle
of extension farther then the ectnal necessity of die case
rettllieslif, felno such a disposition, there had been
giveitto the ,Bake of Norfolk, not what his Rig hellou.
.F cii;s4 aalitm,l a" Wimp/try privilege," bat a distinguish ed
booster—anti if 0 sareresponding honour had been COD-
litrrail.so another • Liman Catholic, Peer (the Earl of
diagal, be hopedirieftilkittflon. Friend would view the
question in a different :light, and not urge the necessity
uraiquore enlarged eleteention,—(Hear, bear.)-At would
ite lbostanittet and sevareof soloweseveltatever was to be
shoien to Rom u Catholics. I( vise overivoesiog loyalist
werri qk pa faell#ifies UNA loielt, bailee
Fin il: and i iscoeer something io the merits of the
'Ord di St. liiiiiii:Viti pelmet him from being made a
member of it, lie (air: reel),wes quite sure that We house
. rail' Ciiiiiitry-wotstiet goon hear an end of COlN-
plaints against b" ry'hnil intolerance. His Right
lion. Friend hill refereed to the stranyremtete of legis-
lation upon the subject.- Would the present measure af-
fgril a case for
.egy (existing anomaly with \respect to it ?"
Certainly ,nht. By Ilia Bill the ltouian.ceWillc Peers of
'lreland wereeligihle' to tit' in the fieusesrPeers, but
airy mitt( not be returned tithe Howie ()Minimal; be.
emote they refused to,,solangibeialto anntel teats. Here
Thin his a Manifest anomaly; the flomau Catholic
, Peers of Ireland were turned back f rom the House of
Commoos because, tests' wet', required, while they were
Lation,itted intio thq. boas. of Lords. balms* there they
were not called upon to make any declaration. And
again, if Roman Catholic Peers were to be celled 'rime
to advise their Sovereign in matters relating to the Est*
blished ChurctiL-" de rebus ertinciatibas ad e.-:leria,p
Angelicanant," in will situation must they he placed by
the Bin ? Would it be right to render the Doke of Noe-
fellemempetent to lilt the, highest situation in the House'
of Peers, and yet at the saute time render him incompe-
tent to receiveo theielighteetsoark of confidence from the
Sovereign by an ollial- situation ? This was a stirong
Itrgoinentakainst fliig Bill, and showed the propriety of
'waiting till tliewillble qnestion was brought under ceim
ssideration. There were many tientleinesAle flint iletiee'
oleo opposed (lie Roman Catholic alaims upon pribell
olr.. and he was sure they would oppose dim
pretest proloteition. Before be concluded, .he triplictl'
to address a few Words to his opponents. There
were,' made advocates for the Roman Catlilic why
.thebelit that the' result of the illscuosion upon tlin`quele
Simi albite claites, ought to be iii the langinge id the.
diesolitioaolhioßight Hoe. Friend, " • final and cone
Mliatory arningtinent." To those .lie would tiny, that
the arrangements contemplated by this Bill could not be
final., There were ethers who were pf opinion that
teliiii the question was ilieciissed the whole of thelito-
matt Catholic Church all Over the world ought to be
brotight • meter consideration, in melee to decide noon
what mcovities <Melo to be reenired. The Bill of last'
Selminagootained a provision for secaritire, •and he
,would, ask those win thought that they were necessaro,
whether it would he wise when the general question
was to he firoaght forward six months from that time, to
pass a partial measure, Whisll provided no seenritlep
svinttioever ? —(1 tear, hear.) • If this Measrore wire sand-
.tioaell by the Howse: he what eitna.iun would the advae
.4
teerfer secariticsil, plsesdhe *n sconorities came to by
(,whaled- %You'll they: not naturally he soh!, " you
bare ediakttedoinepart of the Roman Catholics by here-
oiitary. rig it to one branch of the Legislature, without
requiring any security 1 why then is security required
of the' real?" And when the Reereemitatives of ijor
'people ivere only 'retnrned to that ii.mar for seven yeats,
broi us, it the end of that loerin,l, sent back to their con
gamest*, would. it not be .theidious to elemend.eriewri
ties from. RoatimeCaelwilic.ldeuthers. while Rotnandelie
tholic Peers were allowed to si; • for life is the othei
House witliont giving any secarities at all? The King
alight select the Duke of Norfolk, the Earrof Shrew*
bury, Lord Clifford, tied atone other Itocuan Catholic
refried objects of Rakel favour. but woe! I not this b'
drawing an invidious line of distinction with respect to tbi

. .
,great body of that comesenity. There ergo these who
,owisteuiplated the greatest deem from Ircland.li the
claims of the Rumen Catholics were not conceded.
Atoll who said 'hot it was vain to. appeal to
the Protestant Constitution of the State as an argument
Against the admissibility of the great body of the
tel. to all the rights and privileges which their fellow-
subjects enjoyed. He was not disposed to excite soy un-
fair prejudice, but he could not by any means sanction
the opinions which these advocates advanced. lint
there were others. who, like his Right floit.Pridnd (the
Member fur fife. University of Dublin), ergited the gees.
upoo the greatest and most coustatoinspil principle
--eitamety, thei.pliment right whirh existed to every mils.
jert to isdiiiissibility to office, whateser might be his re-
Ifigielts .titeeta.-e[The Right Itueoutable ,Oentleinan
here read ate Cattail fiesu the speech delieerrel, by Mr.
Pleokett last *Newt, which urged the subject a right to
all Lis cenetiPuienal privileges
.in is, free ,slonarrhy
like that of EnglawiLJ—But it the right of
.admissi-
.hility to the House of Lads were mire. p.smtioned,
Ices. it not wiwug. be .would ash, to pastleAc• fur a
'mature t, the right. of admissibility ..tst • the House
,of Gunosons 3 • Let it out thee .big; PabtPaned.—
The object of, thimaildress sc..* not so mach io exclude
Romeo Catholic Peers from seats them ber House,
het to endeavour, if be could induce the home to post-
pone the consideration of their use till diet:Woe of the
general body of the Roman Catholics, were considered,
and corresponding securities given. it. was certain
that his Right Lou Priemd would not give sly advan-
tage to the Catholic question at theospease of those
great constitutional principles which alone ought to
guide thy house in their decision respecting it. As fur
himself be should not endeavour, to get rid of the motion
by moving the previous question, he should meet it in
the fairest manger.--(Cheers from the Opposition
lienches.)—lie should pursue new the same course he
lash always done; and disclaiming all codes prejudice,
lie felt himself called upon to give the ototimk his de-
cided negative. .
Lord F. Otlit-Ell supported the motion, and observed,
that be sairtigsted it as a great act of justice, which
'vtail be attended with no clanger to the country. It
the Peers whom the measure would admit into the House
of Cords were the veriest Jesuits bred its the recesses of
the:Escurial, lie•hmild still support the motion, with the
Iconviction that it would be perlectly safe.
Lord contended that tht v•stiictions nn
the llommi Catholics was au anonaly in the British
• Cowl Wien, and stood onsapported by •ny out doctrine
laid &Iwo by, our greatest lawgiver,,.. Tae, claims of
the Catholic, Were fonoded in clrar matter of right, and
could only he rejeeted upon scats ease of great danger
befog nimle,Out. Ne such ate bad been, or in Ida toPi-
nion could be mad,: nut. Let them look at the great
nattres whose lower to serve tht jr•Bing and country was
thrown Into Use dark by than Ji,:hilittes. I'hsu tjtl: s
were so malty memorials of the glory of England, and
he did not rave thatistan's feelings that could drive
them into disfranchised solitude. 'flie strong conch.-
lion he retained that whatever subject disc/la:gad his
duties as a eitilieo wage:Aided to the privilege of being
a litatesuien, °doom' him to tale that view of this qtrs.
thin which he was then advocating. For the sake of
the noble persons themselves him did regret that this
question bad lime agitated. Fen its space of a century
and a half they had stood at the bead of their sect fur
purity and integeity el motive. They had Melt told
that it was without their knowledge or consent that
Co:s question:Wm breeght forward. If he had here
jtal'44l*.-listiLlta-8.4114.1,13.4"

11;0'mi/sou. disclaimer made to hint by a Noble.frieml
of his. He aia. nut mention names, however, from ma-
fives of delinve4 Uteiltihriabl appear invidious to the
rest of that bokhet+wbir itltrwas lure, felt equally soli-
einens dee the visslfdre of their fellow roissitrymen. He
should give his' vete for the motion, from a conviction
that the thortidtif of widely his Rielit Hon. Friend the
Member for-Hublin (Mr. Plunkett), had given notice,
would Pone 'than a twelvemonth be carried triuni-
"bandy. He had hoped that the visit of the King of
these realms to his Web dominions, bad been the
herald of peaks Mid emancipation: However it might
not be apparent, he wis uoovinced it was only delayed,
not dest royed.' • • •
• Mr. WA RRIt begged to remind the Right Hoe. Oen-
demon (Mr. tPeklySelvose historical knowledge was so
great of that' period of our histort, when upon Queen
Elizabeth being attacked by a 'combination of three of
the most powerful Catholic Potentate` of Lireige do-
minions, she (those** an Ambassador tb represent her
interests, a CatholierNobleman. 'Mat Nobleman was
Lord Montag-IV; whm had frequently expressed his vio-
lent Catholic irrinelples in Parliament. Ha mentioned
:this to slice; that .thet shrewd Princess did not think
Catholic priricillies •inconsistent with the most perfect
political lieneitp Regarding the state of persecution
in'whieli the Reined Catholic Peers were living, he was
entivioced that Hi they warted and erivbhdied thetas in the
LeTislature Mitt trbitld find them most useful and faith-
ful ineinhersof it.

Mr. MARTIN (of Galway) anpported the motion.
Mr. PLC NKRTV began by stating that, as his Right
Hon. Friend had.eirtelusted the present question, ver:-
little remained faritlet to say Upon it ; indeed; he shoal
not now hare tebtibled'the house with any ohme;.•
ration, were it tVol'illti:its IM had given notice of bring-
in; the general'qtivitionforWartt,next Session, a notion
might go-forth litette'considered • the present measure
oas immaterial wet* he to —remain latent upon it. He
most, tliereforeinkgative any inferenciof that kind, by
declaring that'll, fully concurred its the measure now
prioposed by his Right Hon. Friend.'in t,ils_e course of
'.the lest Session felled thoughtyrepesefoienimit to that
,•house what•leffeelisidered an essential-act of justice to-
Wertk the great body of the
1• Catholics; yet though that
Measurewas carried, there were ab many embarrassments
!brownie the way of it% that it was tiltimttely lost. He
' Jed not moan to say that tile meastote blot heart unfairly
dealt with, Int many Catholics objedted to it on account
ef the protitious it contained, and in ,these objects they
went encouraged by the enemies of the Inexture. On the
• .presentocearion, however, lie was he to be relier..l
• from all'emherrassments, because the pt.eient was a die.
tints proposition, having. for its objeet oothing morn
than to reslore certain Peers of thi. realui to their here-
direr?' honours, rights, and pririieget.—(Hear, hear.)
'These imlividtta, lead already had a certain portion of
their rights restored to them; they had • ohtaitteil the
privifege of being the advisers of the Sm:errig in Conn-
' ell •• awl Mirka was now a•lic,l for was to allow them to
holfreptiblic advisers of the Uoverrytientin Parliament.
(Hear.) —N., ill consequence had arisen from allowing
sheet to be Privy Counciilors ; and how toald it be shown
that any i:an.,‘-er would result from allowing them to be
Legislator.? I t was said that the pr'esent formed a part
Of a general me sure; bet that was no ground of objec-
tion, partienlarly so, when it was considered that that
House, bad already agreed to the general measure. He
was gia,l indeed to find this measure brought forward in
such a shape and form, add Such a spirit of justice, that
the Members of the other House, as men of honour, as
gentlemen, vs friends to the Constitution, were called on
not to shin their doors ai,eainst those who claimed to be
iolmirted among them in ri:tue of their hereditary
rights. Parliament was now merely called on to reverse
an .let of Attainder which had been passed in a spirit of
injustire, and which reminded one of some of the most
aboetint.ble measures that ever stained theaonals of the
emortry. That Act was passed because the Pretemler
'0 the Throne was a Catholic the innocent bra rods
of the heg;sieture was attainted and penished, merely
see •aorontrt of the guilt of another branch: and 'was
it fit that the Ouija/true:it thus inflicted on innocent men

°WiiMiAr . •

r .

elonlel he semi need ? It had been said that this attain-
lIPT dill met teke place is consequence of the plot of
Titus Oates, but on account of a plot carried on against
the tioversasent. Me admitted that the Catholics is
ti.e reign of Cbarles 11. were not well affected to the
State : but would any man pretend to assert that, at the
present day they were disaffected to the State ? Certain-
ly not. Tlterefore, as disaffection was the cause el the
attainder of which he spoke, it was an additional reason
why the present measure should be ihecanse the
cause was removed ; because no disa=saw existed.
He wished to set his Right Hon.-Prided Ark as to the
accuracy of Unhistorical facts; the laws Catho-
licsaiiilass
formed so part of the measures M the Re.
'Alone ; they formed no part of the Ili of lights; the
Oath of Supremacy which formed a part of that Bill,
was introduced into it merely as a measure 0 security
in order that the Muarch should (matinee the supreme
head of the Church. The oath had existed before, and
it was necessary to retain it in the Sill of Rights. ,Lf, as
his Right Hon. Friend asserted, the spirit of the nen-
" sions against Catholics formed a part of the political
srstem adopted at the Revolving, the Parliament had
ever since been doing away that Revolution; for many
• years ago the Parliament had repealed the whole of that
• monstrous and horrible Penal Cede comprised in the
Acts of the Bth, 9th, 10th, and Ilth of King William,
' which, among other unjust and creel reetrietteas, went
• to prevent Roman Catholics from wheatieg Asir chil-
dren at their own houses, or by sautes of their
own ehouieg. All those shamehtl AM, were passed
after the Revoldiee ; of which they formed no part,
' and they were sow entirely done away.—(Hear.)—
Here the Right Hon. Gentleman assigned the redress of
their being passed: and read the remark wade by Mr.
Hacks on the subject, with a view of illustratiag his ar-
giastat. In this Mr. Burke stated that the Acts of King
William had been brought in byes* party with a view
of thrown, odium on another. •The very argument
now advanced against the present !potion might u well
have been urged against the Bills for the reed of those
laws which were passed in the yeity 179 VI, far from
those Bills of 1791 being hostile to the Use, they
were all in the very spirit of it • for the p • • les of the
Revolution were founded in freedom,. the removal
of all sorts of intolerance towards a sect what-
. ever. At the time of the Reformation, the great body
of the peOple were Catholics; hut, at the same time,
they bad resolved to shake off the power of the
See of Rome ; and the salseeleset departure
from the doctrines of that Church was chiefly occasioned
by a love of liberty, because persons professing the Ca-
thelie religion were endeavouring to destroy the liber-
ties of the people. In whatever shape this question
might be brought forward, he should give it his sup-
port. If it was brought forward as the Ilse of any one
individual, he should not object to it, because it would
be en act of injnstics in hint if he did so. The present
was a measure of justice, of conciliation, cad relief, and
it would be hailed by 'the great body of the people of
Ireland. He could not counr in the soldoodea that this
measure would be an infring•emeat ea the privileges of
the Lords, for the Lords had often introduced siaisaves
. afft•eting the privileges of the Hew of Coomie. There
• s ere many precedents to show that it was asspetsat
• for one branch of the Legislature to legislate for the
' ether. One of the chief grounds ea which the
Linds rejected the Catholic Bill of last year, was that it
went to interfere with the privileges of the House of
Commons, and so far Om objection in question was done
away. Not one syllable had that night bees uttered
against the hereditary claims of those Noble persons.
The Rill now proposed was therefore a messier* of
jzstice to which they were entitled, sad which it was
the date of that House to extend to them.
Mr. WETHERELL. as soon as he became audible
in the gallery, was understood to say, that oilman before
had intimated a partial measure upon this subject. Ac-
cording to this measure, the proposities of Mr. Pitt,
that no concession should be made unless it could be
qualified with commensurate security, -would be Mseat-
doued. This bill was like the bill presented to Dr.
Johnson in the Hebrides, which had no edibles or
liquids. hot ouly provisions. This was a perfect book
of provisions. Next sessions Catholic commoners
would expect to be admitted, poi posse, without re-
strictions. After the Peers and the Commons were so
admitted, what would the church say to the veto t He
would rather have the measure in tote, than in this mu-
elated folio. His opinion retrograded by the attempt
auw made.—(Cheers.) Ile was not disposed to measure
spears with the Right lion. Gentleman (Mr. Canning),
hat he would say, that of allextraordisary.bills his was
the scene and perfection of unrivalled singularity.—
(Cheers.) No man had before merest to confer the
right of election without security. In 1823 the Right
Hon. Gentleman might not have it in his power to ad-
vocate the general measure, and therefore it was that be
brought forward this portion of it in 1822. (Great mar-
Inuring and eonghing, which continued during the re-
mainder of the lion. Gentleman's speech.)
Mr. CANNING then rose to reply. After the full
measure of attention lie had received from the house, he
was only desirous of availing himself of the privilege
which the Louse allowed those who brought forward a
tuotion. The Hon. and Learned Gentleman had consi-
dered the measure he proposed to introduce one of a sin-
gular nature • but with the exception of the hostility of
the Hon. amiLearned Member, and that of his Right
Hon. Friend, it appeared they had been discussing an
object which all were desirous to promote. Notwitle
standing the opposition he-alluded to, he ventured to
say, be should be the harbinger Of that success the Ho-
nourable and Learned Gentleman might deprecate, but
could not prover* Mr. Ceasing then explained his
statement with respect to the sth of Elizabeth. The
plain fact was, there was a test which excluded some
from the house of Commons, and with regard to the
house of Peers there was nu exclusions at all. With
regard to the tights of the Peers, be bad bees
charged with inconsistency in not stating the re-
strictioas imposed on Kutch Peers by the Act of
Union. He had not taken into account the limitation
with respect to the number of Peers allowed to legislate,
but nothing be could say or do on that subject would
cure the anomaly. The Scotch had contracted that no
change should take place, and they were without remedy.'
The Irish in the Act of Union were more provident. lie
had been charged with differing from the principles
upon which Mr. Pitt and others had supported the lid-
man Catholic Claims. It was said by those who some
years ago opposed the general measure—. Let us have
parts of the measure before us." On the present occa-
sion a part was offered, aced they called for the general

Our great capacity had stomach for it all:"
The Catholic Peers had been unjustly excluded, and the
question would be, whether the exclusion was to de-
scend to posterity for ever. If the Peers bad been
wronged, it was the duty of the house to set them
right. Men sent to legislate in that house for 'millions
of Catholics should keep themselves frees from pre-
Edice against tenets which once were general in
England, though now considered by some as a crime.
It wastoo much to see the Catholics excluded (ruin the
rights of the Constitution. and at the same time call
upon them to expend their lives and fortunes in support
of the Constitution which was the instrument of their
degradation. His Right lion. Friend had said he bad
underrated the dangers of the reign of Charles 11. He
had admitted the dangers of that reign. A more cor-
rupt and prodigals Monarch never sat on the Throne.
The slave of France, the adherent of Popery, and
Professor of Protestantism. A bigot tit the be-

•
•

I

glasiag, and a tyrant is the sad. The nisee.l
however, they exposed the dangers of the "reigt of
Charles 11.. the more reason they had at this time
to repeal
Had they a Catholic King on the Throne at this time?
Was it to be supposed! that the admissions( six Catholic
!Ors would overturn the religioe of the country and
convert a Protestant King to Popery? The equivalent
fur constitutional privileges was not required in the
measure be proposed. The equivalent might be ad-
journed, with the /ion. and !waned Gentleman's speech.
Mr. Canning concluded by saying, if this m was
carried, it would be productive of great public good.l
and the Hesse of Commons would atone for former acts
of injustice.
The house then divided on the motion—Ayes, 24/1
Noes, t44—Majority for the motion, 5.
The other Orders of the day were then dieposed of,
and the house adjourned at Half-past Os* o'clock this.
Morning.

FROM TUESDAY maims (LIZETTE.
—.o.—.
■* N 22 UPTCY IIt:PERISSED.
W. Scott, jun., Norwith, centeetioser.
IBANKRUrTS.

W. Watkins, Norton lusts Rempsey. Wereasearshita,
corn-dealer, to surrender, Malt It, sa,andJoes 11. meths
Star and Garter Inn, Worcester. Attorellys,' Mr. Long.,
Worcester; and Muses. Collett. Whisbern sad Collett.
Cheaaery-lase.
.1. Pretbeee,rnedwalty. bleaseatbstaire. shoplaept, May
se, fa. sod Jae.l L a lbs Angel lag, Abortive's'''. Maw'
nays,
nays, Messrs. a. owl Babb, Absdpseemay c sad Mr. J.
Gregory, Cleammeivin.
W. Heath, Cheedietllsaffordshlre. grow, May 14, liv wed
June 11. at the Herd Oak Inn, Cheadle. Andrea) a, Mr.
Blagg, Cheadle; sad Mr. Barber, reeter-lase.
F. Surma, Crawl*, Worcestershire, maltster,
17, and Joule 11, at the Hop Pole Inn, Worcester.
neys, Menus. Wilms and White, Lincoln's-inn ;
W. Holdswortb, Worcester. ~
T. Crow, Norwich, linen-draper, May 17, 18. and hit
11, at the White Swats Inn, St. Peter of Illaseroft, Narwhals.
Attorneys, Messrs. Sewell. Blake, and Keith, Normlsik;
and Messrs.. Tilbury and Loagdate, Fah:ea-West, AWN.,
gate-street.
J. Waukee, Hereford, upholsterer, May 10, I I. sad Jsq
11, at the Ceessereial Hotel, Bt. Petals Syreford. Ardieteeye.,l
Mr. J. Beilnek. Hereford ; and Mr. J. Might, Hart-Week
ribeAmres,llimeroseyard, Herefordshire, vietualler, May 18,
&Laud Irani I, at thia Bay Horse len, Breseyerd. Attorneys,
Messrs. 111B1ard and Hastings, Grey's-tee-square; and Mr.
W. Deemed& Bromyard.
1. Greer, Birmingham, Ireenelleer. May 10, 11. and
June 11, at the Stork Taeses. Birmingham. Attoreey's.
Maur.. Swain, Stevens, Maples, Plana. and Co. Fridge-
' -plaes. Old Jewry ; sad Mr. IL Webb, Biradagbam.
B.
11. kosby, Arbour-were. Colisesereial-read. our-
Algot. May 7, 46, end June 11, ittlienbigball-strest. Attor-
4Mr. It. S. Atcheson, Great Whnbeeler-street.
. Dash, Rast Stonehosse, Devonshire, illValaw.
May li, sad Joss 11, at Weekley's Hotel, yam*
Desk. Attorneys, Messrs. Raise. North, and Smart, Tenpin;
end J. E. Uworthy, Plymouth Doak.
H. Wilson, Hausa Garden, auctioneer, May 4, IS. and
Jose 11, at Basingleall.street. Attorneys, Messrs. Hodgson
and Ogden, St. Mildred's-court. City ; and Messes. Appleby
ad Ilant, Grey's-Inn.
T. Watley, Leicester, brace-manafaeturers, May
lh IS,' i.e.' 11, at the Three Crowns lea, Leicester.
Aditeinsys, Mr. Brews, Leicester ; lad Mr. Chilled, Chas.
I.;9B.lorsiey, NeweasUe-upon-Tyne, linen-drepar, May 11.
110. and June 11, at the George inn, Newcastle-upon-Tyne,
=yarltesers. Constable and Kirk. Syssaad's4aa.
alai
sod Mr. J. Muggiest, Ileirelledmdipme
?Yak
(Diri•Jeads, Certificates, Ike. to-morrow.)