The Statesman.
London, England, 1819-05-03 00:00:00

1311)1111t1) CltAlttlY.

Ills Lordship in this care, said, that whenever an
abase took place in the Charily at Hedfood, for thw
sepport of the poor, and for the maintenance of
school. the case might be brought before him by a
person living is the town. In the present instance.
the Elders of • London Jewish Svnagegue weirs
complainants, and he could not cnsisid •r thee as pro.
per parties. He would dismiss the application, ta
far as they were concerned, and would nest weak
dispose of it as to tbo other parties.

COUP, I' or KING'S BENCII, 11•1' 1.

NEW TRIALS.
MIAS 9. ADAILION AMU °THUS.

This ass en action tried before Mr. Justice PARK.
at (:hvlonsford, when a verdict was entered fur llla
Plaintiff for ::171.

NOl.l/1 no* applied fit a new ltial, we lbw
ground of n mia.direction of the Jodie in paint of
low. The Plaintiff was an wecertificated Bankrupt ;
the Defendants were an auctioneer and his ■ssis.
tants. The action as for a trespass committed ►y
them in entering and seizing some remitters on the
Plaintiff's promiaes. It *as stated at the trial, that pre.
viout to his bankruptcy the Plaintiffhad sold his ►eesw
to his brother, who, however, sobsecient to that event
taking place, again admitted him into possession, and
the assignees agreed to let him bate his furniture for
1001. ; this sum was accordingly paid by a Mr. Col-
linson. The assignees, howev►r, having afterward•
occasion to suspect something improper, directed tbe
Defendants to enter and distrain for rent ; they 'hit
enter, and took possession ; bet the Plaiotitt, br
stratagem got them not. Afterwards they made a
re-entry by force, and this was its. trespass 'cowl-
Idained of. It appeared that the furniture was worths
3471., as it sold for that sum nn*. Although Slr.
Untlintion,who paid the 1001. for the furniture, might
perhaps have maintained an action, the Learned Coon.
DI submitted Sias had no interest in the ptnp►rty ;
but even allowing he had, another and very important
question arose upon this transaction, that was, how
far an uncertificated bankrupt could ntairstain an ac-
tion against his assignees, who were the teal Defond.
ants in the action.

The Coast granted a rule to show atom
EXCEsSIVE DISTRESS.

Mr. SfriPiet LAwc~ applied fora relit to show
nes' why • newt trial slineld not be 'gaoled in a
cause in which the Plaintiff was a lamer, residing in
Hertfordshire, and the Defendsot an oners-er of ill*
poor of the parish, on Ina grown& of an eacrossivis
distress having been made by him on the Wsintitrs
prorpert), the irrfdiet being fur the Defendant, and,
as the Learned Seojeant now contended, against eye-
deuce.

The CoesT vented a role to show nom, 'sprees-
log s hope that the patties would in the nivontinso on.
d to moose to some airsegemmit, withoot ping
to another !fill.

COURT'OF-EXCHF4URR.

STAKE-HOLDER.
&ITC V. CAITVNIOUT.

Mr. Jetty's 'noted for e role to slum nets eh♦
the nonsuit entered in this calle s►euld net be see
'Ride, sod s new Wel greeted. Ile made this mu-

sir!, urn!, t'.e peeved of misdirection us oho port of
ti.o Learned Jodie. it UN in action fri.d !..!ore
N.. Bernet Gamin, at the last Assize. fat q.ifttril,
in rrrneer 31. from ter Defendant, in whose Auld, it
lied been deposited, hi the character of • stake-
holder, tit abide the egret of s foor.race. Ile soh.
wohted, open the motherly, of decided rows, that Ms
action was clearly maintainable. 'rho rase upon
which he relied most confidently, was that of "Cot-
ton V. Tharland," bib Tom Reports, 403.
Rule granted.

AfIDDLBSEX SRSSIONS.