The Statesman.
London, England, 1822-07-01 00:00:00

rorpoiTswv Tie Moo To cilium
£llll.lll t. NTT. • . •
Tide was as action is tree's., beeriest Weiewvot tbe
value of two horses from the deisadauto
stable-keeper at Brighton.
Mr. Sadism Lana staled tke elfei 'ter lbe
plaiatiff, who is a livery etallrbsixris tiowt,ausi who
bad lent twe job horses to a May, wire left them at
Hrightoa Is the care of tbe defendant, who is a livery
stable-keeper is that place. Whim they woes sent-for.
be charged 321. 10s- hot tbillesege was considered as
exorbitant, and 29L tvu stmalkeidr: Which was refund,
'and the .ctloa was strwinsght to sesevei4,ol49
the horses detained: 'The Learned Serjtaat said, that
this was the first Oho that the question as to the right
of livery stable-keepers to details the horses for the
expenses bad tome before a. Court of Joatice. He
argued it great Inigti. to prove the situation of the
Innkeeper ald that of a livery stable-keeper were totally
different ; and that the latter had not, like the former,
the right of detaining horses for the expenses.
Evidence was called on the part of the plaiotiff, to
prove the tender of part of the meaty to the defendant,
and that that sum was a fair remuneration. Oa the
part of the defendant, Mr. Serjeant Taddy denied that
any tender bad been made, sad asserted that the wit-
ness who bad been stalled to prove that fact was us-
worthy of credit. '
Chief Justice DALLAS gave it as his opinion that the
livery stable-keeper could have so li*n on the horses or
property, for his situation was widely different true
thet of the innkeeper. The iankeeper was obliged to
receive the horses of travellers, and to entertain them
bat the livery stable keeper teas under no such obliga-
tion, and received the horses only upon a contract and
upon that contract he might bring hie action.
The Joey returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Da-
mages, 75/.
ARCHES COURT, lutes 28.

PIIRILIN V. FIBRIN.
This was a suit of divorce, promoted by Mr. W.
Perrin, of Leadenhail-street, corn-factor, against Frances
Blesser, Ids wife, by reason of adultery.
The libel, eoataining 14 articles, set for the marriage
en the/th of April, 1818, after which the parties cohm
bited together at divers places, until on or about Feb-
ruary. 1820, when is consequence of some differences, HI
was agreed they should separate; as allowance of 14
1 is. per week being settled by the husband for the wifeli
tdainteomme. That in consequence of such mutual
agreement, the parties accordingly separated, aed Mrs.
Perris went to reside in the Kent-road, and afterwards,
at the house of Mr. Staitbam, In Frederick's place,
Vauxhall. By the evidence of Mr. and Mrs. Staithami
she took possession of her apartments on or about the
lids of March, 1821, and in the course of a few dare
after, introduced to them a Mr. Hull, who at first was
received into the apartments of Mr. and Mrs. Staithans,
but afterwards into her own apartments, where he coo-
tinned alone with her sometimes for half an hour, and
sometimes foe several hours. This was &dog the firm
few days; after which Mrs. Perrin absented herself
from her lodings for the space of two or three days ; and
on her return informed the deponents that she had been
to Beddiugton church to go Married to the said Thomas
Hall; and that she made application to them, that in
consequence of her marriage, he might be permitted to
sleep there; and in order that the marriage might be
kept secret from the family of Mr. Hull (who resided Is
the same neighbourhood), the deponents were enjoined
secrecy ; and for the purpose of keeping it a secret from
the servant girl, he woo to be admitted after she had
gone to bed; and let out in the morning before she got
up. Ea was therefore regularly admittid by the dep.-
smite, and went to the bed-room of Mrs. Perrin, sta-1
known to the servant or to any other person but them-
selves; he slept with her two mgbts out of three for the
space of three weeks, when he took leave of her, as he
informed deponents, on his going to France. That he
was frequently seen by the deponents in the bed-room of
Mrs. Perrin in hie sight owls; and that • night shirt
marked T. H. was found in the hod-room o' Mrs. Perrin,
by Mrs. Staithens.
The several facts of adultery were distinctly denied on
the part of Mrs. Perrin, who, is her responsive 'Urfa-
tion, pleaded that the whole was a malicious fabrication