The Statesman.
London, England, 1809-07-08 00:00:00

dossers was , _ against Paget __
Cameos Law Court, it will be uneemmeary te
repeat them pin. The Court, after hearing the
evidence reed, and the Counsel on botli side, was
clearly of opinion, that the tact of' adultery was
completely proved, and aceordiegly presousieed
the. besbaed to be entitled to the remedy be

Wled,
DAVIU V. DAVID!.
This was a snit of divorce instituted on the part
of Mary Davies against William Davies, her has.
band, by reasoa of cruelty and adultery. It ap.
pared that the marriage is this case look place
between the penances the 4th of November, 1804,
and that they continued to tire and cohabit telte•
thee, as man and wife, till 1800, when Mrs. Da.,
ties separated from her husband, on account of
his ill treatmest and persons) *deem towards her,
and his adulterous intercourse with w
• :. -
tone, Whereby her health became mall
The facts being made out to the sadsfaelion of the
Corart,rt was of opinion the wife was entitled to the
relief she prayed, and accordingly pvessaced tot
the same.
LSO v. recce, VALIDLY CALLING =DULY DING.
This WAS a snit of nullity of marriage, instituted
by-Susaiinah Bing, widow, as the attend attar.
dam of John Bing, her son, against-Miry Price,
by reason of minority. It appeared that the perm
ties wore married by licisticet obtains* by 11104
woman on the 30th August, 180; the
(Mtn Price) being not then 17,,ars of age, and
which marriage was soteinnikell tiotalbut the know.
ledge or consent of Sifikokilrillegrothe mother.
The necessary fins beieg clearly proved in this
case, the Judge (gir Win: Scott) pronounced rye
marriage to be null and void.

GOONEY V. PUCE; YUMMY Cat. Lana !MILIEU,
au atasT.
This was s proseidiug of nullify of marriage,
bounght by Charles C urney, the bgebaod, against
Amu his Wifer,-' lot naiad of atistssitr,
from the proceedings itappeared, that the par-
ties were marriedio 1803, bit-licence, obtained on
oath of the husband; ambito Inaterial points to
be e.ta isbed in rfii-, waid. sreskthe proof of the
minority of the party, nod's of consent of the
father; who, it append,
_had abaculidad from
his tastily, when his daughter ADO was only. threa
yeirs uld, aid went to America, anal bad not
glace that tittle been' beard of. The Coati, after
tasking several portliest observations applicable
to the easy; was of opinion that the proof oas
at to tho points of minority and want of
consent, and theadore dismissed the application
made on the part of the husband.

I S 2."

•••
COURT OIVARAAFRRY.

Fri*, Jilts 4
row.= v. woutorociv.

Thb was se applicatine se vary the deesilanallo,
is this cane by dui Master of the Rolla
ilk S. Itoutwor ,teiia, that le the year 1791
the 'Plaintiff had lelit UM sum of 90001. to Sir
344 Pechell, who, hesides a boned end *mortgage,
imel emoted a oinveymice of lie estates to the.
Defendant, as thistle, is order, by sale or Wolf.'
wile, to pater 'the debt. In 1796, the Ml
tilFrinesteti Illf Jtifiir 'Pesimil ow Me hood WI
19001 sod *sew bittriato geoli, whelp Aos hub
wm
lain evii. ilboal la likewise took poteenius et ft
estates, asst digs Mit of foreclosure. Is 1 .
there was a decease/Ito Anis to au-account, by
which the Manor was divested to take an amend
of what was doe to the 1111.nutiff for principal and
interest, os the foot of dpsipartgagtk anti of
ha l, been 100111/111‘ by des MO of the estate, of Jrr
.I.:lse, up to this Wolof Way. tbeaocoust, Ed
to btrike • baleen *owe
m Onsw••clia-., mi,,
ACCViiii was acoordlooly like% 0048101 aster%
report confirmed lo 1800. The. petition sow pre:
meted by Si John Pectin' prayally,tint tlie doer=
weight lut varied, by directing. the bteetet, in taking
the meount, to make rens, from year. et Year;
sir the rents recsival *NW gilich•lntifif
by IPlaiatiff, totio tialgjoit atpriatorent
fire place, Anil mf-o— - -'

in .0

DITOM CM,ARITY.
I***ls b Ed rtif VI. by
eirldcb the tytb. fli paAlrei ,
voted lo the 1104 Cievoroori, for the
arpon of Claripoon, one at
tro&ton,s116061111 at Enektsser, aid I third at TO.

.

~(.,ii

. ,
in Devonshire, together with
at'Crediton, and foe Wood*/
An at Cogege. The remainder to ,beeppris.
sated to piont nisi. The value of these tythes
.i the reign of James I. wet 1,1001 per annum,
and their amnia! belittles now was no mere than
1,3001. while their *floated Value wait lent
5,5001.'a-year. :Tiat'ien aseigaed b 'thy Plain-
tiffs, the Clergymen of these parishes, fur this re-
markable difference was, that the Governors of
the Charity had, from time immemorial, consisted
of the land-owners and occupiers of •the parishes,
who had given a lease of the tythes to their ten.
ants, at the inadimeate modus of only 80. in the
anti rest, the obvious effect of which was, that
roil:
1110eab were able to afford a greater rent to
rubs r landlords. This cause had already come be-
'Ffore the Cant, and his Lordship bad ordered that
the present moduses should beery and determine,
mil that the Master should take an account of
what was the real value of these tythes, and should
receive prorate for letting them out, on ode.
quote leases, foe the benefit of the Charity.
Sir 8. Rinettat, now applied, en behalf of the
relators' 'that the. Governors, who were laud.
omenn and occupiers, should be made answerable
to the Charity for those sums that had come into
their own pockets in the shape of increased rent,
ilireushis inadequate modes at which they had
!It to lease ant the trim. •
Mr: Has!, for the Defendaats, contended, that
la, clients had not actually gained any thing by
'this small modes. The remainder of the Charity,
Mee the Clergymen and the School were soffi.
, lastly supported, was to go to charitable toes iti
e parish of 'Credit on ; and consequently, had
'tile Whoa bean rigidly levied, the produce must
Aire goo, to the poor of that parish, and kept
elthe,poor.nttes, n Melt were now very consi-
le,' and raised principally on the land, if not
Solely. The fanners, in fact, bad paid fur the
poor, in the shape of poor.ratee, What they
would have paid in the shape of tythes -for the
same-object, bad the modus been larger. Their
Seals would bays beau the same in both :eases, so
that nothing had been derived •to the Defendants
front' this inadequate modes. •
The Loan CEA noattoa said, that however in.
genious the reasoning of Mr. Hart was, yet it was
quite impossiblelo admit it, for 1t would teud to
give an intolerable latitude to the Trustees of all
charities whatever, of which that Court was the
special parties's.. He was far from ascribing les.
proper motives to the guardians of this charity, for
tie &Woe had existed long before they were chosen,-
and they ld probably never thought much of the
matter. lie must add, however, that had the
lands of them Governors brie in another parish,
INS not in this, they would probably have known
se to suet the tythes fur the benefit of the dm-
thy in a very different manner. In cases of this
rt, it was usual for the Court to make such
trustees account fur a period extending as far back
if six your: ;, wed he ens dear that these Govhee
Illbee.slosst ateseent for ',wins of the tythes thermic
caudated to lava received in the shape if 'relit .
C I' a similar period. .1
ol iw4viir. V. Loan Simms. :, at
. ?Ws was a on upon the construction. of a
F.1:1li LAO iiiiary Pelham had cornered her
property, in Sawa, to a Trustee, of wheat
4ondaat, an infant, is the Representative,
' tbe purposes mentioned in the deed ; astd
.., . o SOWS, to convey a stated portion to the
, sad mother portion to the Earl of Chi.
, mildest to the payment of 10,0001. to •be
in rho, gaangr set forth in the deed. The
nd of tip . tear a doubt whether; under the
of OW ; certain wood, called Bishop's
twod, dial arsettrifte Wood, in the parish of
agile& anti the pot tythos of the parish of
*tan, were to hasouseyed to the Plaintiff; or,
whathor.they feral part of that property to be
E - veyefi to /fee's! hichester, subject to t* pay.
t of the 10„Illthif. The bill was Ned be the
• ' , against the Representative of the Trustee,
" slowerowe t q 4 tbla was opposed by Lord
Chichester, tees' Defendant.
After Sir 5. Komi's:, had been heard for the
natant,' and pr. MAT for ,Lord Cliichester,
TlsoLoitry USlAWcitatOlt delivered his opinion'.
Harintedverted to detail to the severe! parts of
the deed, and else to those of the paper of in-
struetions* drawn up for the Conveyancer, he in.
daaturthst be irss strongly inclined to think that
the hitention of Lady Miry Pelham was to Welt&
.the coosessoe preparty under the portion of Lord
Chichester. But this being a deed, not a will, he
iris isosiod to take the meaning not from the
paper of instructione, or any other source, but
from the Jeed ittelf. All that he could -'ay there.
fore was, r` Qssod VOIV it, now dirk." By the
a of the words of the deed, they
the peoperty to be conveyed to the
--e fur a conveyance to the Plain.'
Lordship, in the coarse of his ob.
remarked that some general words al.
• -o.' the deed might possibly have
,y the Conveyanctes clerk, copying
..book with too much. exactness. This
oesessiry It may be for 'parties not to
"Selves merely with giving a paper of
igen to; the most . accurate Convey.
7 ought to have the deed itself, after it
carefully examined in order to be cer.
corresponds exactly with their Wen.

obvious 0

COURT Or KING'S BENCH,
Friday; lids 7.
BRIPORt LORD ILLIIIISOIROUGN TN
tambour a. iIIITCIIINBO6. •
• The ATIOADRYZRDZILIyi stated ebb to be aa
l(aotitow upon a Bill of Excbsege, the• indorse!
against the acceptor. Thor* -Was an doubt what:
nor that the PlaistlWinAdd• seatehoW or othet,
elidtle himself tes.• the sins id windy which hi.
i &bosh* to mown Ws Wiwi; hot it wouldhe
idle is his la au* was retitled to wover it by
this set*, 'hoet Ilia digsdati of. his
- could* gat; **ll therefore
Ne better that he eheuld now state the

•

it ',wild

•

sit
" 4W
i
LA isfs,7 tics.. .. .ford;
schoOl
cowsirroar cot.Ti . ttlell CO10110!fL :echo's'
Nidtig, jAistk... ' • .-• ' plated
• t.....' s.
in the ~

WCLLICIILET ih. 11111pLEILZT: . .
'his mac a proceeding or MAO ''ordivorce or
separation frog bed, board, arid fluidal coltabL
tales, promoted oft the part of tie lionorrabte
3.
nary Wellesley aglinst,tbe t noioerable
La* Charlotte Wcplilonio aby'reason of
adeltery, alleged togiif il . ' initted with
the Right Honourable' 41: t. The facts
sad circolastaseel of this ca b' ing been so re.
reedy before tke public' when a verdict of 20,0001.
damages was obtained against Lord Paget is the

by which, it, was goateed's!, is would be found, Plaintiff...—jilecree
that met only nothing /was to the Plaintiff, but at.
9 that, ou the contrarylP beef pra and estate • N. B. Ifs Lord
if Sir John Picini' a. tms
custody of his
*Io
setvations, remark
ro_stead a( crealiliirt ~ , totting the cleat e(
. Rau, .r 9 eseliala ciasteaded, that hies inserted by the
tballieecelleineuld itifti ' , *lire writh the his 'firm:dent-book
flieriii#l both front tie Ito 'ef elapsed since ' peetesilow Rowell
rat it, aid treat
M.
• of eir Jok content. tindlielves
in a,. e! vi. it (depth* had ctions, gr,cn
5ir246144
it
boot liken 1...
_. *I. he ei4B4 a sneer, They Snit
oil Logg !ital!lavtliry is drawo up, carer%
tali tilt it cOrresp
• , Iws , alt " add, plc would tab. vont
tilt • k
ttea thateti* before hi
.
-- • ea ..• . eat It las he tat ex- + , COURT
• ...` i India - jirbt 6 Idetkiteipply with the •
cl
I
appliation. itdt tkei_fitraslpilte decree, the
Misty i could 14 ke theilaxiatkether lithe he ' . SITTINGS sato]
did;. bat there'4oald 'be aollObt but that, en that
Ways lease timid flat be demi bigwigs the par. PIIIIIIIK
fist. Renewer, Ammer IWO be hill testa iss ,T At
he Troimai,
anililhliesa, he tang
.004e_hr the cherimater :is -action epee a a
wile I* sit there...` ' ' A . spinet the accepts
o ..thou impous•-easaius.
_L • or cu. oit tklith e Pima
Is. taa ati•l