The Statesman.
London, England, 1815-06-01 00:00:00

THE STATESMIM

~~~~~

-..

',

• , •i
upon him' to Pailiament.—[llearl,ltear n--Ale was soilage ;on this point he would only say,. that had
Bare thnt this formed a stieng cue for enquiry, that •these beiet laid •before Parliament long since, to
the'Commissioners might he intecroeated viols voce their entire liquidation he uns certain there would
what" they had done wi'th the Money that Parli4ment not he e dissenting voice. [ llcar !) They were
bed approPriated;4l a very different purpose. The nut now callatg for such a discinsure, but they wore
Prince woutfl not have reason to regret it; but it demanding an explanation of the misapplication of a
weak! bring to light a cabal that 'merited exposition. specific sum which they had particularly granted.—
If the Heise reftised4to exataine, the people would But it was said that in thisbusittess they were merely
siy to them, you 'who are the, constitutional gpar. prying into forms- -forms undoubtedly they were,
ilians Of the Iniblic purse, pay' no regard to the ex- but or that character for which, in better times,
peuklitpre of, (At:Feeney that is • wrung from us by their ancestors had fought and bled.--Let them
lams ioti,; ebße, at the same time, you tome to us look to history, and see how often Parliament had
ilia ask u to pay a tenth part of our income.--:, refused grants to the Crown, on account of their
jl/417.-14 Theme wha'voted against the motion of former misapplication. In the reign of the ill-ad-
hi' No?` e)Fyietttl could only he considered as paying vise(' Charles the First, they would perceive how
court &the cirige. • He would call upon the cope.; satielt the contest for the controul of public grants
trxgeetlemerVlOCotssider that if ever there was a embittered the politics of that contentious day ;
tione..when it was peculiarly atecesatiry In coneiliate they would there see, that after The failure of ship,
the people,,aud to convince them. that they were not meney, and the other tyrannical devices contrived by
cello:tern to centribete •ene farthine. more thap .profligate lawyers and unprincipled judges, for the
acne necessary, this was that period.—[!tear, hear]] pe'rsonal gratification of their Soverein—[Cries of
,Let the House refuse this enquiry, and 'they would '/car!]-that that Monarch was compelled to de-
do more injury to his Royal Highness than could pos- ; sist from his perilous struggle, and to come down
;sib!), be of eeted by atiyenquiry that was instituted. i tri Parliament, not only to desire ;applies at the
• Mr. LEACH declared, that, after the moat anxious disposal of such Commissioners as they should them-
atfention lie had been able to give the subject, he 'selves select from their own body, but also to yield
sow no griintid for the motion of his Noble Friend, , to them the unrestricted expenditure of whatever
The appropriation complained of, he utiderstood, sums they thought proper to appropriate.—[!fear:]
dill mat, proceed from any cabal, as had been inti- ; —This wwas the essence of the Constitutive, and the ;
maled, but was the deliberate act of a Right Hon. ; bulwark of public liberty ; there would at_once be
and Learned Fiiend of. his, whit was no longer a ;an 'end of both, if the Officers of the Crown could
Member of that Ifoltse, but whose Parliamentary I depart from the exact qtiality of tire grants which
.lifo had shown that be would be the last man to ad- j l•were confided to their use. It had been said, there
vistrany unconstitutional act. (We understood the i was no misapplication : the case was simply this—a'
:Liiartied —Gentleman to mean Mr. Adam.) His "grant had been confided to the Prince of Wales wheo
:2,,Ctoble.Friend.badstUted, that if the appropriation he became restricted Regent, for the due mainie-
batl-eveO•besiteeptsdient, still, as a breach of the fiance of regal authority. Suppose that the King had
law, it,eugiti to he censured. So then the sup- recovered at the end of that year of his Royal High.;
.rnint was rather about a matter of form than of sub- tress's functions, would Parliament, he would ask, I
stance. [Lotetterier
,Of hear, hear! from the Op. have paid the 100,0001. for the purposes to which
pnsiiion benches.]—Tire !.earned Gentleman here en- it appeared to have been devoted ?--[ffear
.tered into a Weal argument, to show that no such believed not ; then it was clearly a violation of prin-
breach of the Act ofl'aillament had taken place, ciple; it was of this he complained,' andnot of the
itiven in paint could be punishable in a misapplication of the sum itself ; for be considered
Court of Justice. ;Bar he did net G....id his vote That the slightest deviation in a matter of this
:upon mereirteartieitrargomenti. • He would cun: ;vital importance should be met with the
.direct re,
tend that e•Abt of Parliament which gratstud the probation of the House, without at ail consideringloo,oool. it‘uot'hind. its application to any parti-
.the extee4 of the, pecuniary amount ottashing to it;
.cular pur apd that no 'additional expencel had For those.reasonspetrosted the ileuse.wonld adopt
. • • •

_..gar-
been drum's upon the pnbli6 in consequence of the the.motion of his NOV Friend, And by so put
_appropriation of it.WhiCif but taken place. *hat an mid to the possibility ail there ever hearing those
difference did theprecisiusede of its application make, forms described as technicalities, which were, in point
to the puhlie,when they would sustain no loss by it? of fact,, the. vital spark of public liberty, :[hear,
It Was MWese grounds. that lie could not concur hear, hide
with his &bie:Friend in calling for enquiry. Thi SO.LICITOH.-GENERALcOuteaded that no
Mr. t.• WYtiNE said he had listened with one denied the obstruct right of ParliaMent to up-
unfeigned regret tii..the doctrines which his Learned propriate the employment of its grants ; but the
Friend had just kid down. His argument went di- eery words of the Resolution by which the_ sum of
.rectly against the privileges of Parliament in con- 100,0001. orts granted, were,* that it was to cover
troulifig the Crown iu the appropriation of the public expences that hart been incurred, or that might after-
money, and against the substance of the Constitution wards be incurred. The Act had been silent es to
itself. Granting that the purposes to which the sum I the particular mode of appropriation, which was left
was applied were to be provided for, was this to be to the advisers of the niece Regent. ,
done in the face of a direct Act of Parliament, and Mr. WORTLEY observed, that there appeared to.
were the rules which our forefathers had laid down t be no doubt as to the bleach of the Act of Podia-
for controuling the Crown in the appropriation of ment ; all the extra expellees attending the out-fit
the public money to be treated as mere technicalities, were to he defrayed out of the grant : but he was not
mere matters of form, the breach or the observance prepared to vote for a Committee, as there could be
of which was a matter of unimportance? In fact, no question that such a proceeding would imply eett-
it was a high misdemeanour to apply the grants of sure. It would convey an opinion out of the house,
Parliament to any other purpose than that for which thit the money had been spent in an improper Mil.
they had been voted. The money, for instance, ner, whereas there certainly was no appearance of
voted for the army, could not be constitutionally its having been applied to arty sinister purpose. The
applied to the service of the navy. lie denied, also, country, therefore, had. not suffered. At the same
that it had been applied to liquidate debts for the i time the expenditure of the Civil List had undoubtedly
payment of which Parliament was in any degree created a strong sensation in the country, and he
pledged. The Haase had never in any shape recog- felt convinced that the strength of the minority on a
nized the claims which the Prince Regent might con- late debate on the subject would do good.
shier, and justify, as honourable claims. When, Lord FOLKESTONE expressed his surprise that
therefore, it gave his Royal Highness this money, it I the Hon. Gentleman should acknowledge that a via-
could not possibly hare in view the liquidation of lotion of the Act had been committed, and yet de-
such claims, but in fact specifically voted its appro. clam his intention to vote against enquiry.
priation to, defray the expences which his Royal Mr. cAucrtAFr warmly supported the motion.
Highness had incurred by the assumption of the He had heard that night that some person had ad-
•llegency. He regretted to hear that a Learned vised a mis-appropriation of the grant. It was fit
Friend of his was the adviser of' the measure ; but I that the House should take cognizance of such an
Tn. ch as he respected hint, he could not alter his abuse.
I law of the question hi a constitutional light. . . Mr. wommEir explained amidst: loud cries of
Mr. LONG contended, that though the House ;Question, question;
. was never pledged to pay the honourable claims. on A MEMBER, whose name we could not learn,
hie Royal Highness, yet it was aware that such I stated that be should feel himselfjostified in voting
claims existed, and had in fact recognized them, in- ; against the motion, not only upon the general prin.
asmuch as 50,0001. a year had been apprepi iated for . ciple of loy'alty to his Sovereign, but on the grounds
their payment out of the revenue of the Prince of rso ably stated by the NalbleSecretary for Foreign
Wales. That annual sum would now be more Affairs.
speedily liberated. The Right Honourable Gentle- I Lord MiuroN expressed himself to be as much
matt here entered into a statement to show, that ;surprised as the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Calcntft), at
since the commencement of the present reign, a sum ; the little connection which could be traced between
of 2,328,0001. had been given by the Crowe out of the argument and the conclusion of the Ilon: Gen-
fonds of its own, for the service of the country ; i Ileum' who preceded him (Mr. Wortley). He trust-
while the money that Parliament had given for the ed, however, it was possible that his support- might
payment of the debts of the Crown had only exceeded : yet be obtained before the question went to a vote.
the above sum by a surplus of 301,0001. In order to secure it, he wished to give notice, that
Mr. PONSON BY declared, that he had listened if the question should be negatived, it uas his inten-
with great pain to %%hat had fallen front his lion. and lion to move a Resolution, declaring " that it ap-
Learned Friend (Mr. Leach) in the course of the de- peared to the House that the sum of 100,0001. grant-
ba e, than which he never remembered to haveJteard ed to his Royal Highness on the commencement of
any thing more unconstitutional. [Hearn Was his Regency, had been applied by the Commissioners
that House,
_which was so well acquainted with the to purposes contrary to those specified in the Act of
nature of those privileges, for the maintenance of Parliament.
which it.had so often struggled with the Peers and The House then divided,
the. Crown, now to listen to the snexim, that it had ; For the motion 105
Arehart it - 225
-nosight to controul the sums which it hid appre-.!htnj wily —l2O
priated, and that it was not a violation. of •law.for I The gallery was not opened during the discussion
sis. Officer of the Crown to divert from one P."1:1°.143 on Lord Milton's Resolution, but it was finally 'le-
-
'to another• the money which was intritstpd fora Gee- gatived without a division. .

ialifit.Ose ?. :Such was not the principle for which they The Irish Newspaper and . Stamp Exchange Bills
oricFcentepded, when their ancestors fought up the .were read a second time each, and ordered to be
Wert ,• of .the subject in contending: for the safe- committed.
•
guar, of.,their freedom, by firmly holding. the na- The Lottery. Bill.was read a third time and Pissed ;
'Ara ' sipply. [Bear n The .defence which his as was also the Bill for the encouragement of ex-
". ~ .
11011..a4 Learned Friend set 'up, _was, in point of periments in discovering the Longitude.
fat.t'27O,.lleary accusation of an absent friend (Mr.: • The Irish Stamp Regulation, Stamp Duties, and
Aclant),* for whoa] he (Mr.'Ponsonby) held so high Sugar Bills, as also the African Goods Bill, were se-
r, 'regard, .that he could
morrow (this day).
not contemplate the possibi- Teraily committed, and ordered to be. reported. to-
lily of hie having been privy to such a responsibility • ,
as tiVeewith whith.he was chaiged, without 'feelings , GovEltitthlt•AiNkmE.
1 •
of.ri4iret, tig(f.estOnishmeut. It was impossible be Sir a. HERON moved for Copies,.of the seven!'
could Ikiet-sopirideCted himself. As to the. cec.og- Affidavits made in the island of St. Dominica,:relatlne
;ninon) of Off delds. of the Prince of Wales by. Pie..7' to the enquiry into the conduct. of Governor Ainslie.
lianre,itr," lehad not the, slightest knowledge of suF,frl . STAIIe DUTIES.
a tali. )den: if it fund been the case, it still would ! . The ,CgAISTCI L/194 of be EXCHEQUER.
nolluitify the4iecnniery appliction4n,bich had
.been.: moved,. that ...the_,_ IP:nte2 sloiild resolve itself into a
oillitifietn7. 'The? tvere askedirthey meant to call h.CnMmittee nf*Wayt and 'Means.
for a statement of the debts ;of this Mention Per. 1 The Speaker hating, left the Chair; the Right

I b.
1

,_ _

• • .=-:z

r :J .~ .

' • •
Iran. Gentlentan'obsejecd,. that he proposed, at so
late en hour of the night, to omit several parts of the
new Wee of increased duties, till, there should be a
fuller totendance of Members and an ampler oppor-
tunity of discussion.. Among these were the Stamps
on Promissory Notes, Bills of Exchange, Law Pro-
ceedings, and Bankers' Licenses. lie had no dispo-
sition to take the llouse by. surprise, or to press to
an advanced stage any measure which had not al-
ready received the apparent sanction and approbation
of the House.
Sir CHARLES MONCK enquired whether the
Right Hon. Gentleman intended to bring on that part
of the schedule which related to the new tax on Ad-
vertisements.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
stated, that he had had conferences with several per-
sons who appeared to represent the sense of those
individuals who were more immediately interested in
the measure;and an arrangement had been agreed
on which was supposed to meet the views of both
parties. The general result of his arrangement was,
that the progressive duty on Advertisements should
be abandoned, and that in lieu of it there should be
imposed a common duty of an additional sixpence,
making the whole duty 3s. 6d.; and-also an addi-
tional duty of one-halfpenny upon the paper itself.
Sir CHARLES' MONCK conceived that a new
question arose out of this pito, for transposing the
new duties on sadverti,tr;-eits and newspapers. It
was generally rons;:: `,•it the universal circula-
tion of knowledge pr,.,,ret.i by the daily journals,
and other periodical publications, was one of the
`most extensive and .substantial-ndvantages resulting
from the liberty of the press. The house, therefore,
ought to determine whether it might not be a duty
they owed to the Odic, whose interests were most
concerned, to. step.in between Government ,and the
editors of newspapers, who be could easily appre-
' herid,might coincide in an arrangement convenient to
both, but by sun means eqaally beneficial to the pub-
: lic. He confessed lie was very. iverse:to seeing the
necessities of the state supplied. by means Allich
seemed to tend to the suppression of general infor-
mation. The Right Hon. Gent; he hoped, would at
least have no objection to postpone the resolution, for
the present.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
Assented to the wish of the Hon. Bart.
. Sir MATTHEW %V. RIDLEY suggested the pro-
,
priety of deferring the consideration of the new
' duty on Letters of Administration, as some regula-
tion was required relative to the mode of taking out
`fresh letters after the stamps of the former had been
spoiled.
The other Resolutions were then agreed to, and
the Report ordered to be. received to-morrow (this
dgy).
Mr. FITZGEI),ALD gave .notice, that he shoola
the neat de4r ekosefer.lease to bring in four Bills for
the better regulation of the Excise Duties in Jreland.
—[4 laugh.] •
The CHANCELLOR of .the EXCHEQUER
then gastatoticssi than on, Monday next he. should
bring forss'ara the postponed stamp Duties.
Adjeetned; at half-past One o'Clock.

. • "

'LAT ATTE !JAG ESCR.

-

a.... 41.4, a.

Aka. 4.,

a I . ,

but the exclusive possession of the tam), and migft
have maintained trespass agninst the owncr.of tho
land, if he had interrupted him in the enjoyment fp
his right (6 East. 602). The renting cows, to I'
fed exclusively in particular fields for a certain raft
of the year, had been held to be a. tenement withiu,
the statute (4 T. It. 671) : and so had the after.
grass of a field taken without specification of the
time in which it is to be mown (4 T. IL 348) ; and
a rabbit-warren, with a cottage upon it, although
the tenant have no right in the soil of the warren,
except that of entering upon and killing the rabbits
there (3 T. it. 77'2).
Mr. COVitTENAY, on the other side, was stopped
by the Court.
Lord ELLExnonoucat.—The cases on this subject
have gone to the very extremest limits of common
sense. This was a case of buying a lot at an
auction, and not of coming to settle on and renting
a tenement.
Mr. J. LE Br.tmc.—An occupation of forty days
has nbt been made out in this case.
Order quashed.

TILE SING V. HAYNES.
This was an arrest of judgment upon an indict.
ment against a miller, for delivering musty, unsound,
and nun holesome flour, as and for the produce of
four bushels of barley entrusted to him to be ground.
Mr. 'PADDY objected to the indictment, first, that
no venue was laid to the receipt of the corn ; it did
not state that the Defendant was on such a day a
miller : an indictment must contain the day and year
of every particular fact charged, and this defect wai
not helped by verdict,. 14 East, 406; and secondly„
that the corn was not averred to be for the suste.
nance of man, or that the Defendant knew it was an.
sound and unwholesome. •De cited Rex v. Wheat.
Icy, 2 Burrow, 1125, in which it wag held that the
delivering less beer than contracted for as the due
quantity 'was not indictable; and. Reg n. Wilderg;
1 (iS. 112 S). in which an indictment for at similar of.,
fence, accompanying the ale with a letter of war.
mice that it consisted of-the quantity, tees quashed.
There was also an objection as to the incompleteness
of the two counts of the indictment, theeestend of
which began with no new finding of tite—Jeltr,* and
did not call the mill a certain other mill.. , •
Mr. 80cL.%0 contra, said,-that the Indictient
had been precisely copied from the Crown Circuit
Companion.
'The COURT denied the authority of that book.
Mr. HOLLAND alluded to the REM edition, which
I had been edited by a Gentleman at the Bar. Re
i cited 1 Sess. Ca. 217, and Reg. v. Bower, 1 Cowper,
323, in which it was held indictable in a goldsmith
to expose to sale wrought gold under. the .sterling
alloy, as and for gold of the true standard weight.
. Lord ELLENBOROVGIG—The indictment is defer.
lave in counts : the breach might have been made to
Apply to both counts: the purpose of delivery, Piz.
to grind for reward was incorporated in the allegsr
i tion of fraud, and must have a venue, as it cauld
not be rejected as surplusage. The womi um:hole-
; some did not ex vi teraiini mean for the food of man.
The Court could not distinguish this from the ordi-
nary fraud in Ilex v. Wheatley, end erect it biro au •
indictable offence. . .
.
Rule absolute for arresting the judgisent.

111„/ A lIRIAC F, should-be the foundation of social '
TILE KING V. CHAf.r. Iti ARUNDFL WRIGHT. 11LL losppin,s4, wl-..ich is often disturbed through the pities'
Tito ATTORNEY-GENERAL moved for a rule to oca f.srin the 01 ism not thoioe precautions which would
sei ass-them the enylvirst:nt 'of Host great domestic bleogni,
show cause why a criminal information should not
be filed agaiiist the sole Proprietor, Printer, and 11::;'''n'e.hl ..)';•C ivrterycni nsaatkif:l7.):nah.orbit; been itatinttebed 1+11;1 disease, "I:iVetior %kW;
Publisher of a new Sunday Paper, called the hotted by et t crtain habit commit-fed at an early age. wjenara-
rostcripl, for a libel, in the 3d Number of that Pa- tiv,ainri:.,t:ts..l,;..hir:ir,ris
tpre,innsii,-..
unin estitnertiti thatks,firltef is indisp:ortir.
per, upon the character of Colonel Berkeley and of , mite the ~W.lll. For no di-gorsill:::, have ceent.rihutnd leirmlte
Lerd and Lady Deerhnrst. The newspaper in'Aues- j essentially to de: tens 11+314,ot:it happiness than tease which Are
tlon professed to give a serious, of scandalous `rlttec- i ihrionc=7:luer"eitl. treuirdtd pleasure,
it
was
thisci""itra.
Messrs. CURRIE awl Cos. fur these I:.st
dotes of characters, in the hold lon, and the present '3O years. to direct their studies and attention exclusively to the
'libel appeared under the title of 46 The late fttat treatment said cure of the Velo real Di(ease, and the disardetv
pas." It informed thipublic that an accommodation je.duirseilfhtylletiteeir.dtrie'riller".:ivl7ll;:litt.stosoflernrigemeow of the system pia
the 01.C.fillidefale et hoill.lv”,
had taken place between the parties in a tate call. , ‘tbiell brings. on those distre-sing debilities and deficiencies that
con. which arose from a recrimination on the side (if Lrielle,;;ll,leieri,elhtl7„(
~17 11,1",:fii.1711,44-0:11/1c• iThe
isuccesstul re-
frail fair. It then stated that soon after Aar. 1 racise, r
a. J.A.s.- phut,'"C•4l:4 11111 i 111 V, IV i. i 4; k 2are =let ti:.."eartalappose tjae
riage of Lord and Lady D. they paid a visit of some itiehi c:italogstoci oefi !olive, intlint it ies. It Nelltoyes every person
weeks at B. Castle, and that during the honey-moon ' itiiie pt rstaf4weittiotinlii sueitti.itiftscaTintellrcesvnitfir honour,t"seek Si.-ie "'f try
litch Mtsent.
the Proprietor of the Castle, in a moment of laths'. : CCltftl 1:: and Cu. 'elairn the swietios of sootastle authority.
cation, as introduced to the bed-chamber of the wife, !
.taisnwceut treaVollei lettlto
hese vonitsy of
,utneirtit rradhictiedd fads.
iln profe..irie
Who in the dark unsupiciouly received the ravish& 7 vire i bin, scretthie. as all tml es; must be, be, sof"tubte ex.ist"dence moor:al.:re
for her husband. No names were mentioned in khis 61latnide,, thw offer their wiislance as regularly ediraird
Atenshens or t i Rosati Colleges' of gut se
'paragraph, but Colonel Berkeley was evidently.. Edinj,,so).. skht and' recent cases hf eVerilitoi!iatiLu7itiooan ?led
pointed at as 64 the gallant Colonel ;"" and he now radically cured in the short space of two days. Those of the
swore that he was the only Colonel who was Pro: lures,
oplaiit6n:leortreaa such's!, Ofistruciions, inveterate Stricii
prietor of a Castle, and that the intention. of the.libel sretinx eared. Several littoljemvut ata:il*firelletllte=i tifntilliS'e tint
was to impute to him thecrime of ravishment—thft respectabi!ity have bee.. otyer the ewe of Messrs. Currie and
the paragraph was wholly unfounded, and was a .t.s',..•.l6:l„..lll::iriVce:'vedf MlTlP:edi'!"tof
scandalous insinuation, and a false and malicioas guest 1110 refer eters may he madeB
tle.tahlttP`ansaratilltc`touri3e.'e::-
aspersion of his character. . jee.ore tura, stricierw,
. . ! deuces of the decided ',superiority of Messrs. Currie sad Co.'s
The COURT thought the truth of the libel not qu.ite. fr.periolien.:il
tohte lar
yee,11.1„;:,
anaidnn4y.;rar,ttaireer
tteenrcaleresne,.in .:tarciarssu.
licit:arc;
'sufficiently negatived, to authorise them to iuterfere. Heaviside •Illit wiles stirs:paw of equal t tnittrnee, who att..uiptel
in the extraordinary manner of granting a criminal. .''tt.y the niiplicatinta .il the Watrrierstie,. "siithtnio sec-
.thei.r curem
information: it was usual, unless the Prosecutor was . it'ore'ejl'omenla`4 ote....44...lre4MCn'ili,..blvece:ivk.'ner tle:.m he ri;eun'tretgal.e'rlee:
abroad, as the charge against him was so general as, tarirn,... th,.m•tnnim• for dear restoration to sound mid sigainist
health. It was sett t,i ' them. wsolieitesi, from the t 4), 01,
to render it
...I incauvenient9 to deny it SpeCific:ll%
,I ir,Ole Fait,. Oa had laboured uo:der tam diso;es-iag s..ne to an-
modo el formii. . ; ul ,a:,146. fu! I 0 :. 0, rs ;he load been ender the CM i• ' f .leverA
The Arrou ',ICY-GENERA I. Said, he shouLi have co Sitr;:essis of pii.fessional eminence, yowl., of . h,,,,i „jr.,,,ka.!,ila
difficulty in procuring,' a fuller and mere particolosr Iterevoontlairliet vim( from the, superior issethod of treatateht
a flidaiit, for which purpose the case stands over. .sAdaptrel and pssraas d joy Messrs. I. urrie and Cu.- hr re. eibvJ
. radical cure is the Snort space of one tuonlii :
,i • • " Ma% 18, 1810.
TLC K ;NG V. CROSS AND OTHERS.
These Defendants were brought 7e at pl.a,tor ill cousin wurating la lir.
,To Dc NU KU 1 li., 107.. patson.g, rd. n, _
ifor the nuisance in plying Greenwich coaches qt :r"rric. the perfect rh,nthlnthstei...l of his health, in coo M"""r"
of his wild used artnoisshle 're/unseat of SalClllfell in the Um-.
I:Charing-cipss.
• ug for..ill.u‘vo-1411-' 11.. 4 L'orc(-7----‘
Ittio; Hemet) adoettina he aas slot for isagy years stjosed 'i''
The COURT intimated they would require two
*much cosnalit odd' fleting' Ito., pain ; sod he entertain, nn
sureties in 2501. each, for the abatement of the d"°ll4 °fhb 4444°44' 61"4"d' 4'4°1444 1'611.'111"A attention,
it
perfect nod radical curt- of that dors id rodent's int As he an,
nuisance; and gave them time to procure such secu.- tod u,:traager .t.. Cite utarister 11441 tilling tried the co npinit.l•
rity. he 'bus i: id lit' ;sister.' flow pi fair trial good ain't lamina' him.
(CROWN PAPER. ) , to pu'q th a tribute.of applause to Dr. Laurie, which he."'"
' hly feels, n•sel shall res.:, be must ready :Mt williug to ;moot-
TIM KING V. THE INHABITANTS OF BOWNEcS. ' Llbse ". .
This was a case from a northern Sessions in which , .iarried Tiomeoi.'whri hove loose been
l• '. • • disappointed in their
the pauper had a house in the parish value 41. and ...,,al;ces sodb defects are cis;atsie b. 'Medical ;kill ; and althea': I
1 - assured that in most is-
the
by auction a crop of oats then growing
Ito there , cle re3aiiv ;II of :arts Impediment, be an ulliect of il.asht and a!"
; certainty with others, yd, the ewe of sock defects, by the ern
of the . value- of 121. the greater part of which .
carried away before the expiration of forty days, awl ! droue'saslcrik""t "f
urvaltr9 jt. the
"44elfeleile of Ita'.!l; et
ri'l.•
,y an env.) :19p.lealim, to M,inee. Came 8,13 a.
the question was whether this constituted a tenement I 1
within 13 and 14 C. 2, 12, whichrearliti::ull st :T;;4l!ne4ant"Pe":l'pennpletsal...-rds.ite"l2reirinm' andlprnezeiroreinnerd: loblico- r;•
C. confines the 1 comp mrt cif. Jim) be calimomir.M evtienti of rimer Sri. 1.1.4.
Power of removal to cases where persons conic to ' the greatest seeree) and hod oar. at'their huse. Na. 107. " si.
ion-milt n Patients in the • .ortri, deseribing the pas ,Iclt.e"
•.sottle in any tenement under the value of 101. within
.40 days.after such persons come so to settle. .. of their rasa, lt:e, ant Made Of tiV imp; Vael.v.l4l a Mali Hcce i.:l
' advice and tnetliein..,, the slat,' trill beer/en or sent to :so, ,s s i
Mr. SCARLETT and Mr. G. LAMB contended, that 4.the.,kios,l''ra• To t;II","' that secrecy tA es-e"" "..
e ''''
detiiikiiigs the postage 1.1 leiters,may be added as are .cc.ate
'this was a sufficient
,tenement. The corn was not tur,medtrirres' —ttii' tiatioareardea.
ripe when the pauper* bought it,.and be had, there- r. - - • .
fore an interest hi the land, which was to mature- ii
(2 Taunt. 38). Ile had not the mere right of entry,

COURT OF KING'S BENCE!, THAT SI.

MATRI MONY.

LONDON Prip.pet af,d ptmic:ed by b. Loysi.s.
Sy•yrser al Orswc, S. Flee y4fryt