The Statesman.
London, England, 1821-11-09 00:00:00

.I

•
The.tlaildibsilderiag_rdi thrioaringa a thi nille.
rlttfZ wan
:., . suliciant maid M, grant u auk to
~..00., . •.6 ,
flUaNalr W. OCT.*: .
..,
'.. This kilos was tried before Baron Wooapt Croy-
don,—The CO/ MOW SISIMANT applied this day for s
now trial, os the ground dud A... Luria Jiilr 4114
rejected adolssiWe ovidosts. The question Anorho-
thee the signature. of * plgintiff to a warraid a sio-
-1,101107 trot Paolo* ? Memos was celledlb rift
ibtplaintli was noCia the rims whew the i
op Faid.to hanobeea arta, long enough tq rat is
4111616114 Wit. The lather of the plaintiff' AD 4•-
pentalffilitk.iess sot his 0011'4 hand-saltine The
fainieset rajesat was prepared to can Mr. 'Lees. In-
spoder of lianis.antes, sad persons from the Freak-
dies.= the &sera Passaic% as bdig wellihilled
'inindging aloha wridag, bat the Learned 4atige
coEsiderod etili evidence leadmissibh. 17, airy
hand averdistlor the' deferdsat, thereby. ***big
the signature to be genuine... _ ...44,!,, • • .fittiui
lto ..
The p 0111024 Sall4llO4T 0.1111.111111110, elfeem
4,
ties of the 'edit-was erroneous, such sr as be
bad rejected baring heel received by , mon,.
Judge, Bailors Me, ;notice 4‘shirirst, via Jude,
Ciosldl, in 4 trial at bar. ‘
The Coolit graaied a rule .to show rasa*.
--oss.-- • -
. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Tnunonsi, Not. 8. '

WHIVENSAD. V. 11111 OWN.
.Serfearit iihrw.ocx moved the Court for a rnle to
chew cause why a writ of sequestration, which bad
been sued out against the defendant at the suit of the
plaintiff, should not be set aside. or stayed in the
hands of the Register of the Bishop of London, till
the claim of Sir Alexander Campbell, on whose be-
half the motion was made, should be satisfied.'
The motion was made on the affidavit of Sir Alex.
Campbell's solicitor, which stated that the defendant
is a clergyman. and rector of the parish of Tracton, in
the county of Essex, and that be had granted an
annuity for valuable consideration to Sir Alexander
Campbell, which being in arrear, an execution was
sued out, directed to the Sheriff of Essex, who made
a return nulls bona. In consequence of which a writ
of sequestration was sued out, directed to the Bishop
of London, to sequestrate so much of the defendant's
ecclesiastical income as should satisfy Sir A. Camp.
bell's claim. This writ was lodged in the office of the
Bishop's Register on the 25th of June last, and it
appeared by notice from the Register giten since, that
a writ of sequestration at the suit of, the.pleintir bad
been lodged during Term, but bad no been
renewed till the 27th of July, being a month after
Sir Alexander Campbell's writ was lodged. Oa the
ground. of this irregularity the Learned Serpent
prayed the Court that the rule should be granted, and
that the Bishop of London or the plaintiff, Whitehead,
should pay the costs.—Rule granted.

SESSIONS HOUSE, CLERKENWELL.
Yesterday being the adjournment:days/- *
sions,Ut Cierkettwell; 'held before flawirii, Or.
Esq. Chairman, a cause was tried wherein JaiteaSeott.
Esq. of Oratton-street, Bond-street, was plaintiff, and
the Trustees under the Act of the 52 George 111. for
making a new north road from Haberdasher's-walk,
Houton, to Higbbury-place, Islington, were defendants.
The plaintiff's case was opened and sustained by
Mr. ALLEY and Mr. ADOLPHE* ; and the part of the
Trustees defended by Mr. WALronr,, and Mr. Buis.—
It was stated that Mr. Scott held some lands at Isling-
ton. which it was found necessary the Trustees should
purchase. They tendered him the sum of 125/. which
they had been advised was an ample compensation ;
but this tender having been considered by Mr. Scott,
as under-rating the value of his property, be was de-
termined that the case should go beforeaJory of valua-
tion. The plaintiff demanded 3801. as the fair and
reasonable value of his interest in the land, and the
case was ably argued by Mr. ALLEY and Mr. ADOLPHUS,
who called three respectable witnesses in support of his
claims.
Mr. WALIPORD and Mr. Ewa, on the part of the
Trustees, alleged 1251. was not only a fair and adequate
bat a very liberal valuation of Mr. Scott's hottest.
The CHAIIMAN having summed up, the Jury returned
a verdict of 150/. for the plaintiff, with assts.

b'~