The Statesman.
London, England, 1815-07-12 00:00:00

CI:RTIFIcATES—Arn. I.

It. H. Kaitehron. Liverpool, master mariner—M. Hackle,
Turk, madam pler harrhyard, Frewin.deld. Solfol k,
%Inout. Liverpool. Merchant—T. liarsnall, Black-
water, Hampshire. grocer—E. Hudson, Gibraltar, merchant.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT 0? CHANCERT, Jinx U.

NM 0? WARWICK V. WM. JANT.II AND °TITERS.

SAIIOIL ROMILLY, on the part of the Earl
of Warwick, moved that the Earl of 'Upper Os-
tory, se surviving trustee, might be directed to re-
place out of the sum of 80,0001. due to the Plain-
tiff from the Trust Funds vested in the Earl of
.Upper °wry, the sum of p,0001.,. claimed to be
due from the Plaintiff to the trust, and that the
Earl of Upper Ossory might he directed forthwith
to deliver possession of Warwick Castle, and to
pay the rents of the estates to the Plaintiff, during
his life, and for a copy of the inventory of the
effects in the Castle, and for an enquiry respecting
the felling of timber necessary to be feller!, in sup-
port of the motion, a long affidavit of the Plaintiff
and another person, was read, stating upwards of
80,0001. to be due to the Plaintiff from the Trust
Funds; that the Plaintiff had been prevented raising
the 26,0001. in consequence of the false prejudices
and mistaken notions respecting his affairs, and of
the misrepresentations made by certain agents, re-
specting the true state of the Plaintiff's concerns, for
the purpose of preventing him regaining his pro-
perty ; that the Plaintiff had before and since the
suit made several proposals for an amicable arrange-
ment of the matters in dispute, and fur a reference of
the Trust and Receiver's Accounts, embracing up-
wards of half a million of money, which proposals
had been rejected; that these accounts were not made
• up for several years, and were erroneous and imper-
feet ; that a conspiracy had been formed to prevent
the Plaintiff regaining the possession of his castle
and estates, and paying his just debts ; that the
Plaintiff, having beets prevented raising the sum of
26,0001. by the means aforesaid, he claimed to be'
entitled to the possession of his castle and estates, he
consideriug the same sum to have been virtually
paid to the Karl of Upper Ossory, out of the
money due to the Plaintiff from the Earl of Upper
:Ossory, in respect of his claims upon the Trust
Funds; that Plaintiff claimed to he entitled to se-'
veral specific sums stated in the affidavit, under an
award ; that the rents of the Plaintiff's estates had
I been misapplied and wastefully spent in extrava-
' gnat buildings and improvements, to which he, as
tenant for life, was not liable, and ire building farm
houses fit for the residence of gentlemen ; that
some of the Plaiutiff's estates had been underlet
and undersold ; that the Plaintiff had suffered
great losses by the mismanagement of his estates,
and by the misadvice given to his trustees, who
were advised lint to complete the Plaintiff's con-
tracts for the estates at Tachtirooke and Snow-
ford, the latter of which was afterwards purchased,
and part resold by the receiver, at a profit of
12,0001.; that orders had been given at the castle
not to show Plaintiff the inventory 'of the furniture
and elects in the castle; that the Plaintiff claimed
to he entitled to the produce of timber which was
necessary to h. felled, he having executed a certain
deed, upon the express condition that he was to
be fully roilis,ateel in his castle and estates upon
repayment ud 26,0001. and that he wever weal'
have executed such deed if it haul not been so un-
derstood.

The motion was opposed by Ir. [Ascii, Counsel
for Lord Osiory, and by Sir A imam PIGGOTT,
Counsel for I.nro Brooke.

The LORD CHANCELLOR WAS of opinion, that he
could not grant the 'mitt to the present stage of
the cause, as to the eesioue .tints claimed to be set
off by the Plaintiff alpine! the 26,0001., and di.
reefed the motion to stand over for the Defendants
to consider delivering e copy of the in.
ventory, which los Lordship hoped would be de-
livered.

ASS IZ ES.

11FRTFOR Jars 10.

The Assizes for this County were held hear to.
day. About ten o'clock the Loan CHIEF JUSTICE
and Mr. Justice LE BLANC arrived in town. Having
gone through the usual formalities, they began
ness about one o'clock. The Loan CHIEF Justice
sit on the Civil Side, and Mr. Justice l.e &Aso
tried the prisoners. The Gaol Calondar was light,
containing only ten prisoners, and those for merely
petty offences.

CIVIL NIDE.
DOE, ON TUE DEMISE OF TAYLOR, CIATTTERBITCY.

This was an action to recover p ise.sion of a very
small piece of land, not half an 'ere, which the
Plaintiff claimed, against a man who hail been for.
merly his landlord, under the following circum-
stances :

The Plaintiff had formerly oceopied a small
house, called the Bell, adjoining a common ; and
while he was in the occupation of it, in the year
1756, by leave of the Lord of the Alanor, he in-
closed • small piece of the wa,to as a ;;arden, which
he occupied with the public-house afterwards; ashen
he gave up the house he wished to keep the garden,
as not belonging to the house.
The Le-reed JUDGE was inclined to rule, that any
increase of boundary, by inclosin4 from the waste,
was an accession to the principal properly, and fol-
lowed the right to the land ; hut it being further
proved, that at a survey made of the landlord's
estate, the tenant having pointed nut this precise spot
as a part he held, tile Defendant (the landlord) had
a right to hold it.—Plaintiff nonsuitcd.