The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1833-04-30 00:00:00

THE LIVERPOOL STANDARD

liven full credit for the best intentions in bringing forward his
scheme, but trusted that the house would not forget the sacred
duty which it had to perform in preserving the interest, the
honour, and the safety of the country. (Hear.)
Mr. M. ATTWOOD rose to reply. He had been charged by
the noble lord with bringing forward a motion which carried
with it a depreciation of the currency; but he absolutely denied
the justice of the noble lord's inference as to the tendency of
his resolution. It was rather singular, that although so much
horror was expressed at meddling with the standard, the house
had frequently raised it, till at length it was brought up to 5 or
10 per cent. beyond its rate of value in 1797. Did not these
changes affect contracts ? It would have been fairer in the
noble lord to have brought forward a resolution declaring the
inexpediency of further appreciations of the currency, instead
of moving, as he did, that it ought not to be lowered. Yet,
though the noble lord brought forward a motion stating it to be
inexpedient to lower the standard of value, he appeared willing
to admit of silver as a sort of joint standard at 60s.—its actual
value being 625. Was not this, pro taw°, a depreciation of the
standard ? The noble lord would not go the length of saving
to the debtor who owed £lOO " take thy bill and write £95, '
but he was willing to say " take thy bill and write £9B 10s."
(A laugh.)
Lord ALTHORP did not know that taking silver at 60s. would
cause a depreciation, but if he found that it would, that with
him was a fatal objection to its adoption.
Mr. M. ATTWOOD proceeded, and referred to a speech made
b 7 Mr. Baring in 1830, in which speech the hon. member for
Essex objected to repealing the act of 1826, but approved of the
introduction of a joint currency of silver, "as giving the coun-
try a better chance of maintaining its standard." This showed
that the hon. member's mind was not then made up on the per-
manence of the currency. Was it fair to blame him (Mr. Att-
wood) should he now wish to introduce silver into the cur-
rency, when he had such high authority for the proposition?
By ariereeing to the motion which he had proposed, the house
would be tied down to no particular measure; but if they
adopted the amendment proposed by the noble lord, they would
be pledged to a line of conduct which, if a war should break out
in six months, and the probability of such an event was made a
pretext for keeping up extravagant establishments, they would
immediately be obliged to depart from it. (At this period an
hon. member, who had frequently coughed in a very peculiar
manner, repeated the noise in so loud a tone as to raise a cry of
" Order;" and, from one hon. member, the (for the House of
Commons) unusual exclamation of " Turn him out.") The
hon. member proceeded to allude to the argument of the right
hon. gentleman, the Vice-President of the Board of Trade, that.
the increased consumption of tobacco, tea, sugar, &c., was a
proof of the prosperous condition of the people, and said, that
without admitting or denying its correctness, he would show
that he had most unfairly and incorrectly stated the results by
which it was illustrated. The right hon.' gentleman had re-
ferred to the diminished consumption of tobacco in 1814, as
compared with 1832; but he omitted to state that in 1814 the
duty had been raised from 2d. to Is. 2d. per pound. (Hear.)
Comparing the three years previously to 1814 with the three years
preceding 1832, there was less tobacco consumed in the latter than
in the former period, although the population had, on the right
hon. gentleman's awn showing, increased 24 per cent. He beg-
ged the house to observe how the case stood with respect to tea.
The house would hardly believe that the right hon. gentleman
had stated the amount of tea consumed in Great Britain alone,
under the date of 1814, whilst for 1832 he had stated the amount
consumed in Great Britain and Ireland. (Cheers.) Was it
becoming in the ministers of the crown to meet an important
question of this nature in such a manner. Taking the case as
it really stood, the consumption of tea in the three years pre-
ceding 1832 exhibited an increase of only 24 per cent. over that
of 1801; 1802, and 1803, although the population had increased
50 per cent. He need not explain the cause of the diminished
consumption of sugar in 1814; the continent, which had been
closed against the importation of sugar for many years, was
then opened, and the consequence was an immense exportation
of sugar to the continent, and an extraordinary rise of price in
this country. In 1814 the price of sugar was Io3s. 4d., and in
1831 it was 48s. After some further observations, the hon.
member concluded by declaring the rejection of the motion
would be a calamity to the country.
The house then divided, when there appeared :
For the original motion
Against it

Majority against Mr. Attwood's motion . 192
Whilst strangers were excluded from the gallery, we under-
stood Lord Althorp's amendment was put as a substantive mo-
tion • upon which Mr. Attwood moved an amendment, " That
a select committee be appointed, having regard to the subject
of that motion, to inquire into the general distress of the indus-
trious classes, and suggest some effectual measure of relief."
On our return to the gallery,
Lord ALTHORP was arguing against this amendment being
incorporated with his motion. He observed, that the question
for the appointment of a committee might be put separately;
but he could not discuss a motion for a committee so generally
worded, and emanating from this debate. It was of the utmost
importance that this amendment should stand as a substantive
motion on a question so important as the currency.
Strangers were ordered to withdraw, but no division took
place ' • on our readmission we found
Sir F. BunDETT speaking. He was observing, that although
distress had been asserted, there was reason to believe, that the
distress of the poor had been alleviated, (" No, no,").—they
were well fed and well-clothed. There was distress, indeed,
amongst those who employed the working-classes. He should
be glad to see this question discussed without any mystery. He
agreed with the noble. lord (Althorp) on the subject of the stand-
ard, but at the same time he was ready to agree to an inquiry.
Sir H. PEEL thought that a new proposition, like that now
brought forward, should be reserved till another night, and anf
earlier period of the night. He should be wasting the time o
the house if, after three nights' .debate, he now ventured to dis-
cuss the motion of the hon. gentleman. An inquiry into the
distress of the industrious classes was not very different from an
inquiry into the state of the nation, and no authority subordinate
to that of the whole house could discharge that function.
Mr. O'CONNELL supported the motion of the hon. member
for Whitehaven. The time was come to try the sincerity of
ministers. They -asked the-reformed Parliament for inquiry
into the distresses of the country, and whatever difference of
opinion might exist as to the distress of England, there
could be none as to the distress of Ireland. Yet his Ma-
jesty's ministers opposed inquiry till the declaration was made.
But it had been made by the vote just passed, yet inquiry was
still refused. The hon. member for Whitehaveu had been ill-
used.

Mr. BEAUMONT complained of the eagerness which the hon.
and learned member for Dublin displayed to oppose every thing
that fell from the lips of his Majesty's ministers.
The gallery was then cleared, and the following results took
place:—
The question for an adjournment was withdrawn.
The house then divided on the amendment moved by Mr.
Attwood, as an appendage to Lord Althorp's amendment to his
motion, when .the .numbers-were—
Ayes (for Mr. Attwood's amendment).. 134
Noes

Majority against Mr. Attwood's amendment 137
The house then divided again on Lord Althorp's original
amendment, " that any alteration in the monetary system of the
country which would have the effect of lowering the standard of
value would be highly inexpedient and dangerous," when there
appeared—
For the motion 304
Against it

Majority in favour of Lord Althorp's motion 255
The other orders of the day were then. disposed of, and the
house adjourned at a quarter past 3 o'clock.
THURSDAY.

In consequence of the ballot for a select committee to try the
merits of the petition complaining of an undue return for the
city of Bristol, the gallery was not opened until half-past four
o'clock. The petition complainitg of the Carmarthen election,
which also stood for consideration this day, was (it was under-
stood) abandoned.
Mr. LENNAR D presented a petitionlrom the towns of Epping
and Barlow, calling on the house•to devise some•plan by which
the children of the poorer classes may be provided with educa-
tion suited to their situations in society, and which might not
interfere with their religious feelings and opinions. The peti-
tioners entreated those .who differed with them as to the impor-
tance of education to examine the gaols and houses of correction,
penitentiaries, and even workhouses of the country, and to com-
pare the extent of education among the inmates with the diffu-
sion of knowledge throughout the country at large, when it
would be found that crime prevailed the most among the most
uninstructed.

Mr. HUME thought the subject matter of the petition as im-
portant as any question that could come before Parliament for
its consideration. He could not avoid expressing .deep regret
that the noble lord who held so high and influential an appoint-
ment in the cabinet (Lord Brougham) should .have so much
disappointed the public with.reference.to the .subject of educa-
tion: (Hear.) _

Mr: GORING presented two petitions from parishes •in Sus-
sex for the repeal of the duty on taxed carts, and of the duties
on malt, hops, and soap.

flo.u:after all rest upon the gera
..r.........---- ---,o:{oi' Pro
ented petitions agahttitstco6reliercibcr9fllviiil'bitioutPou the circumstances of any smal
Sir. CHRISTMAS p
aterf° T,tee ° but it woutmight not render bribery dltoget
the ell ~eated,
a.. , d render it much more difficult; m
established church
residentfWaterford, and from
0,1 of .he weei'd''' touch more dangerous to the . rti
Dean and Chapter o
clergy there w remind them that f Pd
the i"
from carfa . ere 1.t.,„ . , Or Cope
.yot per
presented a petition --11. , ion
,0 gain, the, , Pererted by intimidation.
Mr. H. DuRE
Observance B 1
_arisbe
_vf 11,,0t ittes,, - were who objected to the ballot,
in favour of the Sabbathtd two petitions from 1301itiorrt he i' Jed, thessq,, but from pure dislike of secret.,
Mr. ADAMS presented
f tithes and for tne Des....neire„pe,de:,, aid, to mendacity and promise-In:
for the extinction o .
that on Tuesday to }le fl'supet.`", under the b llafter il.
of the Irish Churc-
Lord ALTHORP. gave notice, day
opti against tor rni,,,, a ot, having prom
t of a select committee.,.e wee
h.the hi might break his Promise with iir
for the appointmen.
) and on "` as hum /toting b mat the poll. Now it
move
(hear,
was very t
._ 01 the,. Y ballot might thus break .
countyth
the state of agriculture.
of Waterford.
hresiteib rmi
n thßeicllitfyr°olfn ry
CM • • "Peet. that h his promis
manufactures. (Hear, hear.),ro, the rKer-,..bee e would do so? There con
trade and manufac
presented a petition 1 f.r
window *TM. Id* ,rglilitie twit
the promise had beengiven c
Colonel DAvIES
house and the ...... ,of itheref,, onscienti 11. h
eal of the.
for tiol3 iisP- --, . uus ee ing. (Hear.) T ,
cester, for the re .
of a motion ‘, -ir - r
gave notice
marl tl': a voter would be disposed to b
Mr. SLANEY
and exchange of 5,„„ ep had promised contrary to his
bill to allow the sale
without a specific
some extritneous force '
or compui
rate and other property,
)ry promises alone that the ch
for each case.
also move for a similar committee to WV' .
( Hear, hear.) Let any mar
iiis compulsory promise, and
referring A in his consciencm e
ed to promise to vote for B: he
're and dishonest vote---to tell o
Poll. A promise like this in`
way or the other : the voter n
:ther to his country if he execu
,:ior if he broke it. Compare tl
the voter in this dilemma had t,
libe worse than a dishonest i
ehood told under the most awf
in express violation of a soh jell called upon him to speak tl
it to obtrude upon his country o
•esentatie, and to vitiate the
,islative assembly? What con
iiror who delivered a dishonest
knowingly deposed an untruth
mi. as vile and dishonoured 01
All%
tartrust-breakers did in poison
t h f
he 4
ad n
Iv:
ulttoilvl
apire:::
hurt
t etwhaesh well,
od
uotsnheea
ft 1
b)srsy•
ch
ti what
'fling the fountains of legislatio
,g_e gentlemen were very fond 01
the Lier. They talked as if the only
only wrong which he could
vith one who had extorted from
- person to whom trust was
. priv9.te covenant to violate it,
tett Ins covenant and execute
and censure him for entering 1
they would not allow him to t
laant an excuse for the still grte
trust. (Cheers.) He prized a
~ of a promise, but it was prep°
iotm tatl4gfas if it were the sole and sing
il • e'uld pi' 1:L(11111. Now, the very worst
,itb'etorlaortai'sns,TlYproduce, was to enable ti. ►ithe, would ii7nusea to be violated with i
ni„„ would
,I°l could create any new brei
ith PS of votibc". could introduce . any additic
br'ls sueri,-g' Voting openly, the depend
y. 1 alts kit, r,.and breaks faith with his cot
his superior, and keeps fait
cO4---tita, Of.° other groudd to 'ask for the hallo
at .Rent ar'sit",,as the only schoolmaster of a fi
bewi they plos:el.°7• (Cheers.) In conclusio
I the eart atiPse.a.the Power of breathing int
._, threat.. , &pint, so that they should beco
k40.',0 tl. wild temptations of the private se
!iseietonitions of those who came to gui
tho,l olipro,'°3 preference, if they could of
?‘:` they
oe,tlertt in the bosoms of the vol
It h 11, e khe '' eagerly hasten to do it without
idse itieti/t1 that liuman power reached no
Iti°t by , that the ballot would go near to acct
Ile 4 bred .1
all the moral infirmit:
itile f..Zoye, it.
,?ee of those seductions whi
tzilait,ltvt...
Itsticoesei.r.ai:eihne9etril..l,lags.. all that they co I
age 4gether e„
.nahilities of our common na
:,t,,.4.-11.hd,,ortilinita,edr,,,i‘coa,tketthheemi!, bute
ffi eat the might
tiiey mc..iii
gilt 4acy w "I.ters of evil who strove to to
4a at je,st 041 d riot render a man invulnc
iti :110eue th "able him to walk unhurt. (}J
iop licl be Vli, c'st ilnportant topics to which lc
tiler, 0 whieh ected to calculate accurately thi
titht'llost I), c°l!ld possibly be done; if not, t
il, ,tinsi. acticable extent. The hon. mei
;li.' '-'ll:ri : tarest-8 rf" '
etievtehrttYdnian stood exposed, and.to
sleeto, oe occurrences which he had Ns
'tt, The ," Nivinced hire ofthe absolute nece.
Lae t'
,Iltf
illlt
eh ,at .;,ItY said that he felt great pleasu
Atile eliiites and them ci
le ued I qati„ 'lot, we 'OM giving an honest vote.. 1
ifer'eto arsons at elections, which had Sone
'tresis,'"a` Present universal disrepute tha:
onlYiaasrsa°llpgrowteecretionagaomn
the 1,1..ea,r..) lICC to the civil and religious Jibe
'41441 of b
IN kr . ARLINGTON was opposed to the i
• eal ,---it w
'Yil tesait as unnecessary ;it would a
vie
tat(' p(lii' and it would lead to bad conseq,
p)tll'Y w„tical, Change in the habits and
tio '4144 accustomed was in itself an evi:
twa:tich bell for the certainty of a great prd
.ebi h 'oirit •
Q 4; arfplthr,"4 adduced in its support, were
4itc, e has b lo which the originatetPheollimtedotioowntby
itt 81)44 —nts against it. It was an ebi
~
tilasees of the times particularly as it was el
ti,j4la evil', !Qwhie it wa's the duty Ofparliamet
the I i
atri't,t.teagl(thtlee• Then, the hon. member q
;o:0'411d bake idtserclacY against.n dtlitZercl'
ILI, racy .., due influence, a
. burg
0 • . oere might be some case in
,lit;.,l_,e sway of rotten boroughs and n•
'eat -ii;uentiv no such argument would hi
4,;1 }:v,Fed and reformed rresentative
,tae English due influence according to
al constitution, but it could on
481
rel. t,:;.1111:01,0 1?1?3 o
•)-ho:iew, the ballot would extinguisl
• 14era44(alc°°onesetistii-stiteomnalofm franchise
v o ti
Lodmake frankness which wasthe .pride
l: his life one scene of suspicion,
..,,tlotative system. better or as well a
Itiot, ,t voting under the Reform Bill? l
t nd that would , because it was a secret in
beal'ranel '• .• •
ofliis ~ free voter from all respoi
; theePblicity being a ini
%-, tweed tare ?pwopuoisdedthteo
ball heohtoanti 1
auto
- onl •
:et . yin the light of day. 1.. he fi
°Zed dark•neZwalyndmmerssteoryf.e; wi?twprla.wg
04• bkir,Prrote right, (were it a private
4, 4tnlight apply? b publiclyotherwise,
-e °Ppression of the rich man ?
n,/n•
individual
hear.) He did noI
t atutthilni°per'leveerenitsebrlitbe4a.cownafsusillori
tag individual instances be api
,:it ''''' the advantages in those inst
, .. of Moral disadvantages. Only thin
(Tale,' exercising an honourable public
e kti:n act of which one should he asha
' tbeit w, habit would extend itself to th•
.illigt became of those above-board
~! *ow,' you manly character ? (Hea
I. . 'll -`" have no protection for 1
uoliotelpressor ? He would have a fai
the
"15,x--the schoolmaster--an enlig
'he hohts.) Neither Mr. Mills, from yr]
,-,,' laeraber (without acknowledge
"ritB, nor any of his followers, had
~i on the ,force of .public-opinior
the:
-bad
ettatiebo:.asschinoonluoefn:epdhibloustogyhyo'n'
to bees. forgetful that it.possesse
,ill intluenced by good ones. (I-
-• e
° Protested against the mann
,1:110 twr 'I, ondon had•divided the consti
(1% te°elasses he landlord and the I
then
. Yrants and the slaves, Neither c
ke,
ter llefomioer in designating the new con
11,8' Ile/TPill as living ciphers, and
etlisi,
hv 14Ppeal '_; not know what might be the
4,1 la,. eo to such members of the hous
e'ete incl Populous places and asked
, house intimidation ' Cries of hear
,at • -Use Might imagine(f the ton
~ 14-11„ , „ • TOM . ,
4k, =Le Luited States all parties we
th 4110 t. „
' he would read them the sent
"ai. leraselves the nominees of corr
e 41412 :lo slim them how wide Abe

MANUFACTURERS' JOINT ens
Mr. SLA NEY rose to move for leave to brim
ble manufacturers and mechanics to insure tl
temporary want of employment, by giving
creating a safe joint fund, vested in the pub'
approved and available security. In order to
ance and growing number of the class for VI
legislate, it was only necessary to state that
century, whilst the increase in the general
country had been t 5 per cent., the increase ill
iug population was 50 per cent. One of the
which this important class was exposed col
quent fluctuations in the demand for their lal
of fluctuations in the demand for manufactui
were many : they were both foreign and dome:
of employment had been superseded in consc'
inventions, as in the case of the hand-loom
at present in a most depressed condition, be:
tam the competition with the 'power-looms•
of canals and rail-roads, in particular 100
threw persons out of employment in one p)
time that a new demand for manufacturing
created in another. Bad harvests had prodin
Those circumstances were sufficient to accie
constant prevalence of distress in some part
The most important point was to ascertaii
for the evil. Iu endeavouring to provide'
against the distress occasioned by temporary
ment, he did not propose to do anything lY
which would cost the country a single farthinl
sory upon any one,--he merely proposed to gi
hundreds of thousands of industrious men to
of safe deposit funds which would ensure then
tress and want arising in cases of failure of 4- ,
believed that if wages were equally distribute"
country there would be sufficient to keep all
class in comfort. He wanted the members
enabled, at periods when wages were high,,.`
place a fund which should supply the dehel
period. Manufacturers would then have a fuTte-oblri
upon in seasons of deficiency of employment' 0 b i:01
one which must recommend itself to the h°ll s sti
He proposed that mechanics and manufacturer
or got
lowed to deposit joint funds in savings' banii'laylae?od,
securities to provide against that want of elnPiayat'd.
was continually occurring in one trade or other ositor'od,
of the kingdom. He wished to prevent the dlher3„;,e,
a fund from being cheated, and to give the it'esest e";s
facility of recovering their funds as was at Preed that
the members of friendly societies. He suggest being",
permitted to draw up their own rules, 110thinficoollt
except that they shold not be illegal, Pargi. soeie
them to enforce their rutes as in cases of frien Yo.sillgj
would give them security against trustees, and:„Po.r that
their own officers cheating them; also ennet`Z
ficer died, his executor be obliged to satisfy :he
society in the first instance. He would gice,`•estilYts?
ry mode of recovery that was granted by the le o,il
Act. It might. be said that the funds would be ille3ber_is
vented to mischievous purposes. He asked :eh foil
expedient to prevent the accumulation of t 5.0 thg?
they would be misapplied ? Let the house of OD r,
between the evils of combination and want and
it would find that the latter produced misery the
I°,
an equal, if not in a still greater, degree thOroetil:000
the manufacturers were to apply the fund i011)„,ad111
deuce which had led them to accumulate it sc.-o",etO
out the evil of continuing to do so, and the)•or lc°
ter. The hon. member concluded by movingrd
in a bill to the effect already stated.
Mr. COBBETT thought that it would be iii.ucohf tbheetet;sl4
their money, if they had any, in the pockets
was not likely that they were overburdened -3
sent. If the people were well fed and well clot bad
I
be able to take care of their own money, if the}
care of. A exPres tbe"
Mr. HARDY supported the measure, and e°-
that care would be taken that those funds sil°" -
ill 'Ol
to the purposes of combination. .
Mr. UME thought that the word combin
coo s
i
siVe sense, had been too much applied to a's°, sbilethe
men for the protection of their own tnteres?.s on too
term was used to designate similar association reselioo
the masters. Ile would give his support to the fig iiejjl
but if any part of it went to impose restrictqe sou
posal of their funds by the working classes,
such -a proposition. free°t tlll
Mr. HILL supported the measure. His 110n",,d
her for Middlesex was mistaken if he soPr'Coefo,r,
sure was accompanied with any restrictive °
ci
A
„
He was of opinion that friendly societies ha L
of
Mthe greatest benefit to the countr
hay. tliaPt?
Mr. SL ANEY, in reply, said tt this mensureeistiO -
any. coercive clause,—it would allow those 5°
their funds as they liked. pb
The motion was then put and carried. the /
fronl os
Mr. PHILLPOTTS presented a petition oe ja
of Glocester, and it stated, that in conseelleb
taken place at the election there last Deceul ear
the
cent election there, it was their conviction th.r
enjoy the free and unshackled exercise of the,'
through the introduction of the vote by bali°'' the
The petition was read, and ordered to lie 011
THE VOTE BY BALLOT.
Mr. GROTE then brought before the house -to
inn the method of taking the votes at electioto
Parliament. It was his intention to proP°sec..e.a9
secretly instead of openly. Strongly, how' -a`rgic
importance of the change which he was a It,
scarcely have been bold enough to insist tlre
anywise inconsistent or at variance with th 0 is.
l
late great measure of reform—a measure 'O6O
not allude without his humble tribute of adn
f the
tude: but it would be in the recollection o
noble lord who introduced the reform billi
; ,
opening speech the question of the ballot, 'hll())
object of declaring that he pronounced nu oerotio.
that it must be left for subsequent collsici:real
dered the reform bill the first approach to that system. The great decree had g;one forth too
to be altogether extinguished, and represent'. .0
its place. The idea of a sham representation.t.
amidst the disgraces and mischiefs of the Pu'',
that principle that the house last year re-org' ,
tuent body. They gave it a new form, tbc;lscl
number, and distributed it into new classes _
He believed that the reform bill gave them
about 1,000,000 of persons. What would they'
had been a special clause in the bill dividing: t'
to two classes, votersjuris nil and voters jar"'
voters and servile voters, voters entitled to ts
and voters under legal compulsion to espreocei
another ? What if the bill had enacted thatf
compelled to give his vote at the dictation of .uhea,
best customers, under the penalty of 1;50, ‘‘,s,
to exercise his own free-will ? If any of tb!'t so,
been directly prescribed by the reform bill, ',hot,
torn in pieces amidst the execrations of theoloceoot
Tories, whigs, and radicals would have deubeeu,°
unanimous voice. There would not have this
vocate from any political party to vindicatetio
of the right of private judgment in any rrhst
(Cheers.) He should be told, no doubt, tote; ai
stand, the law interfered with no man's
might, if he pleased, refuse to obey dictation
doubt, if he chose to abide the conseelenceqs:sfell
bets of electors who escaped from this o'rents
conscience and their interest by refusing
t°
others made a compromise for refusing P'itiicl
giving no vote at all. We had here a sett-
meat, resulting from the unguarded c°l-I,ithin
(Hear.) Examples of this kind must be had
of every gentleman who heard him, and be cis,
to have laid before the house a few institt.le, the
occurrences at the last election, illustratulf,veY
operation of this electoral interference i',ol,
reflection, he abandoned this design, not le bon
terials, heaven knew, for the materials wer-o,ll'
but partly because he did not choose t° csage
vehicle of individual accusation,—partly be

act O. t•oed litt
tilleereforeTt he
illtillotiihgiriees:inifill'isll:::l:lawl;fill bill
0:1 ill
oreetti :ill lelkle:to:iftset"llll,(rlll:°f!ntelb,
•hieh ht:, p rate
'during IfY '4l 4t. the
pOplilati°;:lfif, aY the)i9g
Otte
in the 013 t eti)t, to lar
so t
rrt
c great•o kiceo
onsistedb,e c‘lv'llood le the
tholir% acstlf,,:st it tt()0111(1
a fat;
'61.4 13id o)is
;stie. efill?et4totiatr tot
,equeloc oho kes.
weaverkie toj 'l!ltiant went
o uoa. oc. r,r
el !_4.t „theleg
t'1041,0;444.84)4 a ;
~alitieaplace, a ooN, treatewriho k
IdustrY tether
ucea e r.,,bf • these ills'
;tint!l,l3.o
rtbreopeete 4p4oiestiot
for oritkaPstieeeta
• we' dfdil
dft, eterg key pai
111 ` derive] a, b ,
\c'"` co' 'eaus,
legal - the
oth
be taki and
ng, 0
eropo og kit, th
give r.t tns they
to C°ll',,tagt °lel Of by s the
em 1:
fee 'Pie 1
eraP tlO, co t,
rte
tea ov--cy,Pilitcoant a
the real' laO v; et
tithe' bot
of that c• iolka cove
t 1. the 11R th
to pa d
as Is
e San e
icienel 010 at, Ise-kc4c!itv
~ fund t.bi4c,*ll.llki te,Pi

sh eh ill
aberii;yiroffill,!4,,Nict h.
bat
aoc it tqii-otrary ••tv,
e,. fr
I),jt, e 'es; Ltittiti! ti-`e.sw:
)t. the 0 ittPyteBe4t evident],
'3
tiookr ',11f(11:11111:tged
liis °IT
oelit t.`4l-„ the Etiverit'
Loll' ft)thei 41, ''4(l,,g 131.1
e that 9 lie brat °kit] be a 111
A 10 Illy )1044 arl Li
ver'illlP it 4 41 Viet
Ilrg if • 4, i4je-boarti t
00 It'oViki V r' W 44 tllak
le prichild • W• I,,rte 1
'OP ,e i t'4
ash,"
call Icil'
lairatjh° odfcl 44`elltaet.'
the
iiiio 4 11 tern of Ifr, .11
11 °the the '0 lt,„l).kli 11° t, roltitin
witoit eqicittAlte t),,,i 1%.,e11id tp
,pitiioo.e+„,,be44s;fratlerl
14
e 3 Ire ipy ;it bii,"Ltdeecl
, reooooo),Ati 444 rred dal
,t,'
a, t,i3O
33s o:4::liciiii7t4l:ll,4::tht 1141
halloti tptlri?
ot:
jea telVo (.1 thietfraid
tolall
;3111 ill'''. 0‘4141.4.evQ4 b4llot
ICY a (le 0114,i' t the
OP '00'0) re Nil I'sti °PI
a ''.e, /1319,) 11ta.4 in 4 °II-
.). l'"‘l3s°lf';4gPttio 'tlN
thau:
t hate.Jae,eille lie h. 4 4 its 4t
lies' of ct a 'Alt of 'nor
a tO l tttii exe,
a 'cool!, jo, •• the ean.a,
•ess t'''tiqe 44'1 tC4rile het
ever, or 0 01k,,t14%, ell w, al
fOO evef k,k:ttribtitit 1
01'31100PP bliSt Ili 4) Ito 'es
ese etd 0 bil4ir'tiet,
0111(1
, woic 1::44. Net4r,
",,..haia 116., 'Q/ft rheers '
outiceooe illalo
ali.le hoe)
iecufoillie r'4t elltilentl4
th-iii f tji 0: i:4t detPhded s'
:i0,!1 'Ol Ijii;
_, thtolkalle
theek of tl°ll'
ate 00,4 P al i., Se
atil,
; :40 I,le f t '`'llde
.. 644 -01
a. ,fhei t , • ;4". Tllty to be
'' a beto,4tr "lhe 41t11.1c iii'. ter r et Y tht t for ,/,
rat' the th Wer4 4 t),),, 131
1,0 a (30111tLtle It ') the telai
~liicte of 441. by 04.
h. yra,
Liti°° thee rk:4 (AZ 11.40'14be
ithitt
olic, ,e. tO. iietra.
133 a alec!Ave'l t)4.4Pe (141
es, - °I(, (4,4 Y lar , ale('
: the 0, q Ner e and
lg. el 'OP be 4113 r e the
,' ll tol'o ° 1 1 . : Vt,ive inil
but 'hi3
~' k ,i, 444 '!lse
to ,d c' trfj, tile 4 4 the/
.aa tP 'q tb_ 41
..4e ~1

taillw'of Als proof most--------
~,„t eer bell OW, not after all req upon the _, •etts agai"- tea) froOlhe 1 aPou the cir • '•
rforatto of , but
.oaltot 0ti,,,,
notcurnsta-----nces of any small number
general
r. C HIUSTMAIS presenteu peti
Bill from thet
enhgemrzes
totl of cases.
operation
o Irish Church Reform
the,, y
of we.ee iota
..,,,, of Pxlielw4o'illitcld rau'errieloirterndua
of the
saeit s.,,ht
render
r . render bribery altogether impracticable,ecom,._
lished churchresident_ in en t
1 and Chapter of Waterford, and from b
the clergy
a the cupartiesit'
ty of Waterford.
,there wer:tl,.l,„irld them, that for one vote perverted by bribery
in c xvoagaiti there tutY perverted by intimidation. (Hear.) Others,
rnuchcomncoerrned; andPn
H. DERE presented a petition fr9il
.Brolin;
narishes 13
f !-L•ef iueiC were who objected to the ballot, not on the score
t
eacy, but from pur.e dislike of secrecy in. any case.
_el_
It of the Sabbath Observance Bill
I bolitiert,°lo w led, th
your
presented two petitions I
and for the a- , ee%. nite'.eo , the icy, said, to
for the extinction of tithes T„sda, tog
gry aeilt, said' rnendacay and promise-breaking; for ad .
ttee -° be tilltPerio under the ballot ft
ir
coniini c
Ord ALTIIOEP gave notice, that on . t
day ite Iga• r, reh,ht break . a flex having.promised a vote to his
•appointment of a selectthe 'am. to tbe last hi
. tha h
t his promise with impunity, and vote
i for the
,and on
._ ip vibe` ,ci at the poll
rate of agriciiltu re (hear;)
nqully
committee to i of vibe ReY ballot • ' N •
Now it was very true ,
move for a similar it} 1. etPect than might thus break his promise, but why should
: and manufactures. (Hear, hear.)
in then ower.....i, at he would d '1 that a tenant
llonel DAVIES presented_ a petition f rodow ta.Al,,,jay, ji.uie, ane,eallse the promise had been • '
0 ? iere could be but
tookne an-
and win the 7,a of ''' eonscieu ' . given contrary is e-
.r, for the repeal of the house .
±' that a, • nous feeling. (llear.) Ile mere supposition
Soler would be disposed to break his promise,
r. SLANEY gave notice of amotaiononfoor
opetortior
rs, .
CO 'wile extrin
(Ore by c had promised contrary to his inclinations, and
allow the sale and exchange .
specific
n other 4)a
dproperty, without a
enpuisor eonsforce or compulsion.
ach case.
arose. } promises alone that the chance of promise-
It was from
jf,„.,(llea.r, hear.) Let any man just contemplate
,ss it. `;',', compulsory promise, and mark what was in-
nt_ Preferring Ain his conscience, the elector had
tisZ' ct to promise to vote for B: he had promised to.
lie ,i. thee ana dishonest vote--to tell a known and deb-
lyi Poll. A promise like this involved the neces-
the a°lle way or the other : the voter must, at all events,
his
~_ , either to his country if he executed the promise,
c.,.;)1. if he broke it. Compare these two lies, be-
Vie, voter in this dilemma had to choose. What
'ltso- t 11'4 be worse than a dishonest vote at the poll?
falg a falsehood told under the most awful circumstances,
saood told i its, vi,, e, n express violation of a solemn trust towards
14 w_ul n called upon him to speak the truth,—a false-
, re ent to obtrude upon his country a bastard and sup-
Pre.sentative, and to vitiate the whole fabric and
aeglslative assembly? What comments would be
ishe,,t" who delivered a dishonest verdict, or upon
'',l then,swinisrlY deposed an untruth in open court ?
ern i„, as vile and dishonoured outcasts, and you
,se.tnti."?"S. Yet note well, that whatever be the hurt
:, au 'eclat trust-breakers did in poisoning the fountains
m pois4oaivalent fountainsslat the electoral trust-
'en pains rt, mg the of legiion. (Hear.) He
, be
Lo Present to the house forcibly this horn of the
ea the cause gentlenien were very fond of dwelling exclu-
ell, aut,ut,er• They talked as if the only lie which a voter
IO faith ,"'e ,hero
wrong which he could commit, was the
• If th4.lth one who hadextorted from him a dishonest
`3y, so e person to whom trust was confided pledged
t ale Priv
-0 forf ••-e covenant to violate it, they must cum-
tactitv ntitt
eoede,_ ell his covenant and execute his trust. They
it; l'a and censure him for entering into so criminal
e cove they would not allow him to make the fixity:w-
ig the etnant an excuse for the still greater immorality
(Cheers.) He prized as highly as any
,„,4 -: a promise, but it was preposterous to treat
. t,„"„fas if it were the sole and single duty which a
ceald'p4s'Arol. Now, the very worst effect which the
NI _ u'.Produce was to enable these c.ompnlstori
would promises to ge violated with impunity;. bu
.t
`ad
with h_i
Would
nu...or could create any new breach of faith,—it
of voti " could introduce . any additional lie into the
• aitt?i", and breaks faith with his country,—secretly,
's
841)e ilg• Veting openly, the dependent keeps faith
• it other oround t ask for the ballot, he would ask it
a superior, and keeps faith with his couri.
4 was tit' L° 1 frivolous and self-
aristoe e only schoolmaster of a
hearPo rae. (Cheers.) In conclusion, he would say,
ly to ti.teats mtPrlt, so that they should loecome insensible to
liwiwetht aussisase.a,the powerof breathing into En. glish voters
g e
uus.mnautimittieeut
)ivo_seiention3 h rational
Pta.tions of the private seducer, and open
ns of those.who came to guide
te _
.s
411 d I.ll.3•Provettv. Preference, if they could opera thi
great
v? oey " nt in the bosoms of the voters themselves,,..
it helte kne eagerly hasten to do it without a moment's Oe
d,ikaewtZtttthat human power reached not so far as that ;
it 141!)t by i, ,he ballot would go near to accomplish the same
ise n—reakiPeettfYing all the moral infirmity of the voter,
th-verbol, g the force of those seductions which would other-
„ all fralitietteratt_
~., yhat %vas all that they could do with respect
kg, °getlier
eradicate'iq liabilities of our common nature; they coul.dr
„it aid
eoun them, but they might circumscribe thei
Ito, these !erwork their efficacy; they might disarm and Ight They 14.1oisters Of evil who strove to take advantage of
Lia:t leystweealid Out render a man invulnerable. but they
~111 cDia,a tbe•thnaule him to walk unhurt. (Hear, hear.) It
4(al'lt.-4' be di;:-°st iraPortant topics to which legislative_attmen)--
eller:) wee ected to calculate accurately the force.of.ttea_ti.
t„ If titnt eve,y man stood exposed, aucirto remove it
.1 alto -
t N." 1114 possibly be done; it not, to diminish it to
tiit ' eaostreticable extent. The hon. member sat down
1 lir °ruble
eh.
Inv isG,t . cerin.
'lel te3ll .plav said that he felt great pleasure in seconding
ielleliosit• ei:','lluvei_ocecprr.encees which- he had witnessed at the
't th ' goite, uc a him of the absolute necessity of the bal-
lii Z elect ' Ettld the parsons were leagued together to pre-
it4litutiaulflot,onr.Berfevoniit giving an honetvote. Ile would vote
. ,p, a protection. against the meddling
if leto l'iat'rBeas at
osto tit, elections which had done more to bring
~,t „resit„ unive disrepute than perhaps their
ithe`i,..s'ear )-ilee to the civil and religious liberty of the peo-
esll,'4,l ri On)
leti for .tRLINGTON was opposed to the motion. It was
t.11)41 ves•u-i-it was
, unnecessary • it would attain no good
NI 40 Poltl.-414 it would lead to' bad consequences—moral,
tilt7l.:--ieilY tvr:rt:4l, Change in the habits and institutions to
, ~ cu
~,,, accustomedwas in itself an evil, which should
tv aehb `' for the certainty of a great practical benefit ;
44,18? the tie'll'el'ithad been pointed out by the hon. mover. The
ci,ilalchtt.,!:trit in which the motion originated, and the !ea-
-144 etk:a bee adduced in its support, were, to his npn d,
41' 8181tiollireli_s against it. It was an ebullition of that
tt tl•4Bels i.',.L.le times Particularly. as it was evolved from the
'tild:til 4,".114'h It was the duty of parliament to check, ra..-
tOY°Ps 'rength-rage. Then, the hon.
theirmembe told them surely t,
sho 9l the democracy against ich ; but.
ll tietso,4q ha •
tit q racy' ve its due intfuence, and the constitution was
tiel,ll,litik t There might be some case made out for t e
klit,nti:dle swaV of rotten boroughs and narrow constitu-
i..l:Olt eivire4tli no
reformedment would hold,good under
rt st°44l hargea and representative system, . Pro-
iTetieehe t Zerlts due influence according to the spirit and
'''t e. 1'14,1' 'so constitution, but it could only exercise this
4Ni1114 G a tiro voce system of franchise ; therefore then
141 y stunt °fat? unconstitutional mode of voting. Then
i ol f
Rtati. c'vel),2_,,lew, the ballot would extinguish that sir
't• Ik,4tal -."4 frankness which was the pride of the English
Sh Iv ptTake his life one scene of suspicion and hypocrisy.
~55 it eTti, Was also 131)posed to the hon. member's mo-
resent
to'llll:kLeprese-t7r,(l.
,for ? Would the ballot attain the ends of
"afrlo of "4-4 c system better or as well as the
.p . .
Itial ilat v°tiog under the Reform Bill? He maintained
7t.ty
114 st, imucluse;
64t14..„' allot
ilt.:),,ltulli'ld weeat because •it was a secret mode of voting.
the als .., the voter from all responsibility in the
i:lt lit herrvdeed the only means of ensuring respoust.hatt}n
publicity being admitted on ad . hands..
4e 401)4,, darkness d vsterv; it panted rur th, ope
lolt ~'!lltil_ 4,:qt
itouly in theanlighmt-of da.. 1. be franchise was a_
teki'e allot;b ivate right, (were it} a private one,
N(I aft • toight
ally of it.
ci the aid to apply, but not otherwise,) and the UMW
i Drev bcio, exercise it publicly was unwo
LZllr theat th •• prevent bribery and .confusion at elections,.
intSeCluesetioel•pression of the
_rich man ? Let America
but
r"bLttlt,li4 ha manll.
,(Hear, hear.) He did not deny.tha.t the
io '4(l t 2, individual instances be a protection , ;lik oto it A the advantages in those instances bore no
rely k 4)4 s korai di d • ntages. Only think of gene.rat-
1Y
titlie*--1 lereisitlsc, an honourable public trust as if it
aettile sto,,,aa act of wilich one should be ashamed. Wear.)
Atie tlieCe habit would extend itself to the other acts of
qa tvou
Zi- 4tt.til, t became of those above-board, upright, and
411)8414, lites of a m nly eh ter ? (Hear, hear.) But
Zi-I-hersk .ticbc)ol-1,.,1_4
eYsou have noprotection for the poor voter
it°,l4a,, ,ruallot.t'y; sor . lie wouldr have a far stronger one
tin,Hth_l(ot theli„', --the schoolmaster--an enlightened publiinc,
a,, h n''') Neith r Mr. Mills from whose Er srq
:44 t--;_g4t),,,-* illetuber e (without'. acknowledg,meut) derived
lietsit tlt•ti't,tie'cits...,
_nor say of his followers, had fairly,met the
-.Lo tikat school f " philosophy"
it (14„ teetof pa the force of .public op,inion lint it was
k,tte ,the Mitreo
II "Ittl Lad was influenced but by one•set of motives,
that they argued
4,1•• lo iettei t-,:.°lleat forgetful that it.possessed at least an
i ele.'`‘• IS - L'e IntluenCed by good ones. (Hear, hear.)
:ttyiihtt 4iitt‘o
i,,, Protested against the manner in which the
hri,l'ert(tit,° two 'Wild on had divided the constituency of the
ilk h°ll' th:Casses the landlords and the tenants, or, in
1, „N•'' Ite,Qu,,r In designating the new constituency ere-
V•v 4...* tae,.-Ykrants 'and the slaves. Neither could he agree
qe'lltel.B' 11-eTiaula as living ciphers, and as mere wax-
e ' by laPpet , aot know what might be the case in Lon-
, Tkrg ;e'.l to such members
andthe house as had been
ii: aBl,e,tede 6:let Populous places., asked them whether
hills tLessiv ."'selves the nominees of corrupt influence
;"eer, (ll..,honese'l2_ti.tnidation ? (Cries of hear, hear, hear.)
tr Wtt:'.k iu-the'pght imaginelrom the. tone of the hon.
. .
sre ti" hallo, ~.,,iited States all parties were united iin
e trntC
' he would read them the sentiments which
lo show them how wide that. supposition

MANUFACTURERS' JOINT FOND%
r. SLA NET rose to move for leave to bring la
manufacturers and mechanics to insure diet-
mrary want of employment, by
Ling a safe joint fund, vested in t e
üblic
.oved and available security. In order to sl,_enhe
Ving thel]cuL
and growing number of the class for whiel°
date, it was only necessary to state that tb
ury, whilst the increase in the general
itry had been t 5 per cent., the increase in
population was 50 per cent. One of the
it
h. this important class was exposed cnsi-
it fluctuations in the demand for their labour..
actuations iu the demand for
uea
manufacturig 11
many : they were both foreign and donicstnic._ce
mployment had been superseded in conscq
rations, as in the case of the hand-loom urea
in
resent a most depressed condition, heinit! k'
the competition with the power-looms.
anals and rail-roads, in particular l 0 lie,
w persons out of employment in one Place'
that a new demand for manufacturing Ol'
ted in another. Bad harvests had produce'
se circumstances were sufficient. to aeollat
lant pievalence of distress in some part of
most important point was to ascertain
the evil. In endeavouring to provide ,1-tut
nst the distress occasioned by temporary ,„,
t, he did not propose to do anything II
:h would cost the country a single fartbiog,, of
upon any one,—he merely proposed to gly
Ireds of thousands of industrious men to ec
ak
afe deposit funds which would ensure thein
; and want arising in cases of failure of etaP
xved that if wages were equally distributed sta
itry there would be sufficient to keep all the
3in comfort. lie wanted the members
)led, at periods when wages were high,,te‘,4;
e a fund which should supply the den'
od. Manufacturers would then have af'
a iu seasons of deficiency of employment.
which must recommend itself to the hot°
proposed that mechanics and manufactures°
;;I to deposit joint funds in savings' ben.,r,j,
rities to provide against that want of e"".0
continually occurring in one trade or other in
kie kindom. He wished to prevent the sit
ad from being cheated, and to give the WI
Lity of recovering their funds as was at Po,
members of friendly societies. He sugges'
uitted to draw up their own rules, nothlaracin
Tt that they should not be illegal, l'arAl
a to enforce their rules as in cases of frien.
ld give them security against trustees, and Pr th3Cov
r own officers cheating them; also enactin',
7 died, his executor be obliged to satislY salee4oe
ety in the first instance. He would give.,„";;f3dlY,`:,lo
It
of recovery that was granted by the r"abe
, It might be said that the funds would be ober&
ed to mischievous purposes. He asked such 1`1%;
edieut to prevent the accumulation of °lie thew;
r would be misapplied ? Let the house ,strd
veen the evils of combination and wan' of 00
ould find that the latter produced misery and I°,
!qual, if not in a still greater, degree thou operlPoill
manufacturers were to apply the fund it"Pr
ae which had led them to accumulate it tc°,,cule '
the evil of continuing to do so, and the for has
The hon. member concluded by moving " ir
bill to the effect already stated. h bet"toil
COBBETT thought that it would be nioe, the Peti
r money, if they had any, in the pocketsn"ol'4
not liCely that they were overburdened iie 0
cl, it
If the people were well fed and well do',
ble to take care of their own money, if tll6'
. fir 6,
Lr.of HARDT supported the measure,and ektiLleoty
care would be taken that those funds 5110 a.
ie purposes of combination. ie
. atiorly „,
lr. Hostig thought that the word corobie riaooir'
sense, had been too much applied to o's°,- bje,he
L for the protection of their own tuteres”, on
I was used to designate similar association
rooto
masters. Ile would give his support to the Ps 01,41.14
if any part of it went to impose restrictione 0.0
aof their funds by the working classes, at)!
L -a proposition. Out
:r. HILL supported the measure. His hon' {title
for Middlesex was mistaken if he supe'r;oo9'
was accompanied with any restrictive ecti -bee
was of opinion that friendly societies ha 04D
he greatest benefit to the country. are °IlfA
Ir. SLANEY, in reply, said that this meas-
coercive clause,—it would allow those sa—
r funds as they liked. rph
he motion was then put and carried. „, the f
lr. PHILLPOTTS presented a petition frt;ce
ilocester, and it stated, that in consetla-ber, ea
m place at the election there last Deeela t
t election there, it was their conviction tha folic bye
)y the free and unshackled exercise of their _by.,
,ugh the introduction of the vote by ballot• the
he petition was read, and ordered to lie on .011
THE VOTE BY BALLOT. ~ 00P oil
fr. GROTE then brought before the house I°. for
the method of taking the votes at electionb'st thei!,
liament. It was his intention to prouoseL as V
.etly instead of openly. Strongly, hotge,-riie it
ortance of the change which he was tt 1.-i
.rely have been bold enough to insist uPea„lrotr.ll
wise inconsistent or at variance with tne ,clo‘o6
great measure of reform—a measure T,tioeise
allude without his humble tribute of n 4113,11,0 Ite,
D: but it would be in the recollection ot„' men e
le lord who introduced the reform Inm.ith'P'4o,;),
ning speech the question of the ballot, P'
:ct of declaring that he pronounced no °P„tioe're4:),f
:it must be left for subsequent consider-al fe 40ad 1
the reform bill the first approach to thatr" 000losti
em. The great decree had gone forth 00
e altogether extinguished, and representatlos Pt) oil
glace. The idea of a sham representatioo t.
'dst the disgraces and mischiefs of the l'nsoelit 00,
t principle that the house last year re-orge wt:oc
at body. They gave it a new form, theloa
aber, and distributed it into new classes , 0001,
believed that the reform bill gave thein,love 5`14
ut 1,000,000 of persons. What would thq.,,tcov,e/1
been a special clause in the bill dividing. turieiii
use classes, voters juris sus and voters jell' a 5511115, tb
srs and servile voters, voters entitled to ass Ovid
voters under legal compulsion to esre t 00)1
ther ? What if the bill had enacted that es„,
.f DI)
welled to give his vote at the dictation of one
t customers, under the penalty of 1:50, wsPL, eo3ls
xercise his own free-will ? If any `Dill,tb!'t oot
n directly prescribed by the reform .itelc it
s.
in pieces amidst the execrations of tbe !odeies, Whigs, and radicals would have deooue, 001
nimbus voice. There would not have btehisPtrty
ate from any political party to vindicate
jai
he right of private judgment in any Pnri,"at 05 (le
leers.) Ile should be told, no doubt, t't„•
So Oho
id, the law interfered with no man's ve
iea
:ht if he pleased, refuse to obey dietat'
bt, if he chose to abide the couseq.uelic,e,%jou
of electors who escaped from this ce'eaistelle
science and their interest by t°
refusing ,r: to dribs
ers made a compromise for refusing t‘e.,7iiicte d
mg no vote at all. We had here a.
it, resulting from the unguarded Oa ;olio
ear.) Examples of this kind must be
ew-bad
very gentleman who heard him, and h 0-, s'e or,
Lave laid before the house a few instal °, the. 0,41
arrences at the last election, illustratiof,ory ovi
ration of this electoral interference in an) *b
fron' to°
action, he abandoned this design, net Dot bit 01
als, heaven knew, for the materials wereol,:o,l,o "
*partly because he did not choose te „Aso
idle of individual accusation,—partly

.tY ef 'lh:g by u
the el . eXpe Ot
tax, !r--4.et that
24 ,7aof4l4'ne aulellse
nortiOl__,;ol.lllerekr,
teeose
Pt of 61' :I,lle(Ctilahat a
ta;sreefere bthe
13' bill° break9rapel'''r
liaTtr:torer:
hero tacit 01 ttue ved . thi
) sla,),5' •:n cot ,:t• 1)/
oe. --;islvr'elle'e
betbe reitrate lie 'aitticer'
lulfell of lyio the
popula1000t:4 tithe g one
11 the 11' t
geatqu tbe.laieeti whitTerioi
nsisteahe CYAVs,Ol9pd the
bpur.....aotrfa'l2,t ne`t!,lll,,.
riql6lab°llls ec,4"elloo"edis
e rood tol,
,sgtisese.r.tr scho kosi whi(
wearersble '',Opir!'hous went
jog 1113.5 tr0,i0,A,,4 of ?fie '11)4: Le.gi.l
t tyiyouttess w a
pm
ays44eatte"atedl'° kl
dastri 4014 the_ qien
Joel " vilfj 'hese i.ost
wit for oustr)teustiee lOcheie
of tbe cer rihaeker etic
a a r"oPoetUk pP°xsor
e 't
of c /1'44, beaeuis
Ic3lll ca'cotal4 tel the oth
y leg,' be re 11, an,fith
35, oreloo,kouli th
gPc.COIVCCt Ber(b
,0 oaiogt y
;to '541,1 'L..' to fi.7.
efIIPW), the erll, "30de tie
Lea °Ce *litv "tit • 1114 t
the 1°1'630'41,i °I btit
of that, . cove
to put oYof 4,0,,the t
icieal 111.11)1ali'utile-Iteue,,e!Ity
a faa, 01/110t toring
t be its t'
• Coold Per
:o.use bfolabitleityl,er rkaortaPi"ssi
urors,s gee; Would Pr
oltar,glea'Aßi4„- woui, oc
exoerail,„o,, no
her 111,4 bre,,, vo!iti
01 break
raeoE'reei°4thidu l ha(ll' W
rese,l3.l,o,tit
lesta Teht .
beio la" the arlstoe
`ll' heZ?osse,
tiaivrYjamc jog jtih,ts threaty arld
e ti 0