The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1851-12-02 00:00:00

EAST LANCASHIRE RAILWAY.
ALTERATIONS FOR DECEMBER,
ISSI.

_ _ .. , ... BOROUGH OF LIVERPOOL, to wit.
GILBERT HENDERSON, Eso., RECORDER.
MILNER V. HARRISON. MHE COURT of QUARTER SESSIONS of the
AN application was made on Thursday, the 25tlt 1 PEACE for the BOROUGH will be held in the New
September, before his Honour Vice-Chancellor Sir Assize Courts, on MoNnAv, the 15th day of December-instant,
George Turner, at Bath, on behalf of Mr. William Milner, as at Ten o'clock in the Forenoon. .
Executer of the late Thomas Milner, the Patentee of an Inven All Indictments for Misclemeanours-fOund at these Sessions.
Hon of " Improvements in Boxes Safes, or other Depositories against persons admitted to BeriT; must be entered for Trial
for the Protection of Papers or other materials from Fire," for before Twelve o'clock on the day after the discharge of the
an injunction to restrain the defendant, John German Harri- Grand Jury, or the Trial will stand over.
son, of Liverpool, his agents, servants, &c., from making, WRIGHT, Clerk of the Peace.
using, putting in practice, or yendintl% or procuring to be Clerk of the Peace's Office, Liverpool,
made, &c., during the remainder of the term mentioned in the let Deceinher, 1851.
Letters Patent granted to Mr. Thomas Milner, any Boxes,
Safes, or other depositories made in such or the like manner, UNDER THE PATRONAGE OF HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.
or on the same or the like principle as the said Thomas Mil- FOOD AND BEVERAGE.
ner's Invention, or in anywise counterfeiting, imitating, or THE BEST IN THE WORLD.
resembling the said Invention. THE PARIS CHOCOLATE COMPANY.
Mr. Webster appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Shebbeare il_ MANUFACTORY, Chocolate Mills, Isleworth ; WHOLE-
for the defendant, and affidavits in support of and in opposition SALE DEPOT, 35, Pudding-lane, Eastcheap ; WEST-END
to the motion were read. Milner's invention consisted in the BRANCH, 221.
Regent-street.
use of substances, distributed in an absorbent material in FRENCH CHOCOLATE. FRENCH SYRUPS,
spaces between the outer and inner casings of the Box, which
—•
substances, when exposed to heat, evolved steam or moisture, Are preparations from the
Of all the vegetable produc- choicest fruits. mingled with
the combined effect of the moisture and the material, kept tions which enter into the hu- proper proportions of sugar,
humid, protecting the Safes, enclosing papers, &c., from fire. man dietary, that of Cocoa is carefully purified anti refined.
The defendant sold Safes and Boxes, which he represented the best; the best form of pre-- The fruit syrups are anti-alco-
to be made under a Patent granted to Messrs. Tann, of Lon- pare:l Cocoa is that of Chocoholic. and when mixed with
don, but which the plaintiff contended
_were- istil)stantially late, and that manufactured by cold or soda water, produce a
made accordingto Milner's Invention„erffil were an infringe- the Paris Chocolate Company beverage, which for cheapness
ment on his Patent. An action , d been brought by the has been unanimously pro- and purity, exhilarating and
plaint
Juneiff
last, against the defend
Cant
Jus the. e infringemen
ant, an
special a d tried flounced by far the best exhi- refreshing qualities, richness
in before Lord Campbell d bite at the Crystal Palace. and delicacy of flavour stands
jury, and a verdict foun or the plaintiff, the defendant's
unrivalled.
counsel tendering aMI f Exceptions to the direction of the Breakfast Chocolate in Pots, which requires no boiling, also,
-• •-••1
.e s. d. learned judge on theconstruction of Mr. Milner's specification. in Tablets, plain or perfumed. Eating ChocolaterPounKSticks,
The Lord Bishop of 1 PER nEv. w. POLLOCK. Notwithstanding s verdict, the defendant Harrison had Medallions, Pastilles, and Bonbons,. in endless variety, Chester 20 0 O,A Friend
The Mayor lO 10 OjThoi. Maxwell (don).. 5 5 0 affidavits filed the plaintiff proved the recent sale by defen- invaluable to Travellers, Exc tonists, and all who need a
Edward Cropper 50 0 o.l4itto (subscription).. 55 0 dant of a Safe, Which scientific witnesses stated was substan- ,
portable supply of nein() sustaining food not requiring a
Wm. Casey 3O 0 .tilDr. Gray 5O 0 tially the sime as those proved on the trial, and found to be an fluid to assist its pass as sandwiches do. Statuettes,
,
James Holme 3O
~9" OiT. IL J 5 0 0 infringement. This was verified by Doctor Nluspratl: whose Anirnaux, &c.
Wm. M'Cormick 39' 0 Oißichard Wright 33 0 analysis accompanied his affidavit. The affidavit of Mr. John
,
Thos. B. H W
orsfall .. -0 0 0:m. Fletcher (don).. 3 0 0 Tann stated that he believed this Safe had been made by him Unanimously awed for the COLIC ' AND " PRIZE" MEDALS.
Chocolate Machinery,
Thos. Irven (Dona • n)10 0 0 Ditto (subscription).. 2 0 0 and his partners, and he alleged that it was made according to Chocolate, Bon ns, and French Syrups, used and Breakfast
Ditto (Subscript' n) .. 2 2 O,E. Holford
Rev. Jonatha rooks.lo 10 ()M by this Com y. (See Jurors' Awards, Classes vs. and xxix.)isses Henderson 22 0 His HONOUR stated the principle on which the Court inter-
Breakfast ablets, Plain, in Half and Quarter Pounds, from
Rev. Aug. C mpbell .. 10 10 Orchomas Robson 22 0 fered in cases of this kind, and observed that Tann's specii- Is. 4d. to 3s. per pound; Breakfast Tablets, with Vanille, from
Edmund. olyneux .. 10 10 O'irtmes Mulleneux
John Moss lO 10 0: Rey. Wm. P0110ck.... 2 2 0 stop the heat, whereas :Milner's created a further obstruction French Syrups, in Bottles, at 2s. 6d. and is. 6d. each.
C. Cotesworth 10 10 o!Edw. Iligoin 220 to the fire, by producing at the period when the fire began to PREPARED CHOCOLATES REQUIRING NO BOILING.
Wm. Jones lO 10 OjJames Hakea 22 0 act on the box an effusion of steam, which pervaded the non- Fain Quality. in Quarter-pound Packets, 3d. each ; " Exhi-
Rev. Thomas 801 d.... 10 10 Oi Daniel Waterhouse
Adam Hodgson lO 10 ()James Owen 2O 0 Safe and its contents. His Honour adverted to the long enjoy- Quality," in Packets, 6d. each; "Exhibition Quality," in Pots,
Wm. Gregson lO 0 01William Higgin 2O 0 ment of the Patent which was granted in 1840, the result of the Is. 3d. each.
Ditto (Donation) 10 0 ()Thomas Higgin 2O 0 trial at law, and the clear opinion in the plaintiff's favour The extraordinary popularity of the " EXHIBITION
James Lawrence 10 0 0' Mrs. James Baines.... 1 1 0 expressed by the Lord Chief Justice, and in which his Honour
LATE" is the best guarantee of its unrivalled qual Cdoco-
ity. For'
John Campbell lO 0 o!Rev. F. Parry ll 0 concurred, stating that lie considered Milner's was a Patent more than four months it has been-practically tested at the
Charles Lawrence ....10 0 O'D. Parsons
D. G. (Donation), per ;William Doull llO to red to moisten the absorbent material; and he concluded of TEA or COFFEE, and on the number of cups sold, the Re.
Rev. F. Barker .... 10 0 0' William Gregory, jun. 1 1 0 by granting the injunction in the terms of the motion. freshment Contractors realized a profit of more than .16'1000.
George C. Arbuthnot.. 10 0 0 Capt. B. R. Matthews 1 I •
James Bourne It) 0 OINIrs. Grayson ll o PRESERVATION OF BOOKS, DEEDS, &c., SYRUPS, IN BOTTLES, Ai 2s. 6n. AND la. 6D. EACH.
Currant Lemon Lemon Peel Rasp. Vinegar
J. N. Walker, Esq., of !Mrs. D. Waterhouse 1 1 0
()M FROM FIRE. Calderstone lO 0 rs. Alleyne... ...... 11 0 Cherry Gum Almond Punch Syrup
,„.
James Parker 5 5 OlDr. W. Fisher ll 0 COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, JUNE 23RD, 1831, BEFORE Raspberry Pine-apple Cinnamon Noyaux Syrup
Samuel Holme 5 5 Ili Frederick Hughes .... 1 1 0 LORD CAMPBELL AND A SPECIAL JURY. Orange Orange Peel Peppermint Capillaire.
Christopher Bushell
IThomasproperties. The much esteemed Bavaroise beverage is ob-
Hilton Halhead
James Steains 55 0, Sitter 1 10!''1r. John Tho.nson ll 0 (The latter selling Tann's ,Safes and Boxes, and advertising rained by mixing the Almond Syrup with hot milk. R. L. Jones
David Hodgson
R. Williams
Chataigres. Caramels, Tures, Poires, Noix d'Amerique,
Daniel Campbell 5 5 0 Mrs. Slater
liquids, or materials evolving moisture on the application
Charles Turner
E.G.Deane (Donation) 5 5 OlMr. Williamson 1 1 0 chambers of Boxes, Safes, or Depositories, calculated to per-
Observe the labels bearing the name and address as above,
Ditto (Subscription) .. 2 2 0! Mrs. T. Gibson 1 1 0 vade the chambers and contents of the safes with moisture with the initials T. B. P. Sold by respectable Grocers, Che-
Edw. Jones
Rev. Dr. M‘Neile .... 5 5 01Mrs. Doke
Dr. Dickenson (Don.). 5 5 01Benjamin Ankle 1 1 0 and M Wholesale Department.
r. Webster, appeared for the Plaintiff; and Sir F. The-
The following Agents have been appointed in Liverpool r
Ditto.(Subscription) .. 1 1 OlMr. Hutchinson 1 1 0 siger, Mr. Knowles, Q.C., and Mr. Hindmarsh, for the Defeo-
Charles Inman
James Tyrer
Duncan.Jarnes Ray .. 5 5 0 Misses Jones
William Balleny 5 5 0 Mrs. Kerr 1 0 0 Woods, jun., of London, formerly of Liverpool ; Mr. J. W. 2, James-street ; Mr. ANTHONY FISK, 2 and 3, St. Luke's-
T. D. Anderson
Francis Hamp (don.).. 5 5 0 Mrs. Anderson 1 0 0 Liverpool; Dr. Sheridan Muspratt, Professor of Chymistry, Castle-street; Messrs. S. and J.GOODACKE, Tea Merchants,
Sam. Mellor 5 5 0 Mr. Banks 1 0 0 Liverpool; Mr. John Smith, President of the Guardian Old Haymarket; Messrs. GASKELL and FAIR, Confectioners,
14, Clayton-street; Messrs. W. HERRING and Co., Wholesale
Robt. Bickerateth .... 50 0 John Moore lO 0 Society ,Liverpool ; Mr. B. Woocicroft, Professor of Machinery BO, Renshaw-street; Messrs. J. MILLER and
Mrs. D. Willis (Don.). 5 0 &Edward P. Cearns.... 1 0 0 at the University Coolflege, London ; and by Mr. John Owens, Confectioners,Co.,Tea Dealers, B,Dale-street ; Mr.THOMAS H. STRES, Grocer
Mrs. N. Waterhouse.. 5 0 olßichard Haughton
.Milner's Works for the last twenty years,
and French and Italian Warehouseman, 16, Ranelagh.treet.
Elias Arnaud
Sir John Bent, Knight 5 0 0 Ditto (donation)...... 0 9 6 upwards of 25,000 are now in use—and also of the infringe-
WHOLESALE DEPOT, 18, SCHOOL-LANE, LIVERPOOL.
William Brown, M.p., 5 0 0 Alfred Edmondson .. 010 6 ment of Milner's Patent b. y the Defendant, who was proved to
J. .Moss, 5 0 0 Rev. T. Moeran OlO 6 have used the very materials in the Safes and Boxes he had
M. W. Collett
G. J. Duncan
Charles Groves
T. Edwards Moss
S. Johnston ...... ... 5 0 0 William Temple OlO 0 nation, completely established the Plaintiff's case. Mr.
William Bates 5 0 0 George Walker 0 10 0 Crowder finally addressed the Jury on the facts, and
- 'ondbach (don.) 50 0 Thomas Edwardson
_ . 5 0 01Mrs. Johnson OlO 0 action for the infringement of a patent granted on the 26th of
- ^ AA, Jackson o - A. 't, 184" - lege() -

IN CHANCERY-INJUNCTION

TRAIN

They 50 a

discontinued

o. Train, from Liverpool to Preston, &c., will he

fhe 8 25 a.m. Train, from Liverpoot;-will leave the Exchange
Station at 8 10 a.m., and will ho,-First, Second, and Third Class.
The 9 45 a.m. Train, from-tivarpool, will leave the Exchange
.• _

w
he Mi

For further pulars

~Te'fhint C
71 Stations.

gers to

General Mane

Company's Time Rills.
W. EBORALL,

Nov. 26, 1851

CHURCH OF ENGLAND SCRIPTURE READERS
SOCIETY FOR LIVERPOOL.

PATRO

LORD BISHOP of the DIOCESE
—ADAM HODGSON, Esq.

PRESIDENT

COMMITTEE

C. Inman, Esq.
J. Grantham, Esq
H. flathead, Esq.
E. Higgin, Esq.
E. Cropper, Esq.
T. 1). Anderson, E
E. Alolyneux, Esq

C. Bushell, Esq.
W. C. Casey, Esq.
T. T. Glazebrook, Esq.
C. Grayson, Esq.
And all Clergymen officiating
in the Borough, being Sub-
scribers to the Society.

THE following Subscriptions and Donations have
already been received :

Richard Fry..
Robert Wynhe,
Robert Aked

e s. d

Chas. Grayson...
Lawrence R. Bail
Wm. Gordon (So

Mrs. Tennant 1).111
Rev. J. A. Wilson .
Rev. J. H. Stafford
Rev. Wm. Pollock.
T. T. Glazebrook...
Edward Higgin

Frans. Mill
Rev. H. 11. Higgins
Rev. S. Cheetham
Rev. H. Jones

3 3 o!iid.Asterley

10 0 -11Al10, ,0, for certain ai —. improvements in boxes for
_., OlO 0 the protection of papers from fire. The defendant set ep
James Semple OlO 0 several defences, which he would not take exactly in their
;Mr. Pendlebury OlO 0 proper order. Ist. He said that there was no proper specifics-
Mr. Coltart
,)l Miss Burrell
0.11., per Rev.W.Pollock 010 0 not a useful invention; and that, at all events, the defendant
o'Nlr. Shakshaft OlO 0 had not infringed the patent. He had taken the evidence very
OlMr. Fresh (Inspector). 010 0 fully, and if the jury thought it would assist them he woald
OA. D. Hadley 0 5 0 read it ever.
0! Edward Davies O5 0 The Jury intimated that they did not think it necessary.
°Mr. Fox O5 0 Lord CAMPBELL then said, he should shortly direct their
ODr. Lancaster 0 5 0 attention to the several questions they were to determine, for
01. Banks 0 5 0 they were all for their determination. With regard to the is-
sMr. Macau
() 5 0 them. Here was the specification, and although he thought
0 5 0 this issue was hardly disputed, they must consider whether an
0 5 0 ordinary workman, of ordinary skill, looking at it, could make
0 5 0 one of the boxes it described. The witnesses bad said that as
o 5 0 ordinary workman, in their judgment, would be able to do so.
0 5 0 The next issue was with regard to the novelty of the inves-
-0 5 e tion. The third and fourth were so much alike that they might
0 5 0 be taken as part of the same Question.

Rev. J. Jones (R.l)

Rev. F. Ould
George Grant

Willim Fisher

).. 3 3
).. 3 0

Edwar(
Williar.

H. Henshall
C. Sudlow..

O 5 01 It lay on the plaintiff to show that this was a new invention,
O 5 0 and if he gave prima facie evidence that it was so, the defen
O 5 0 dant would have to show that it was not. Now there was car-
p 5 0 thinly strong evidence on the part of the plaintiff to show that
O 5 0 it was new. It was for them to say whether it was properly an
O 5 0 invention for the protection of papers against fire. The papers
O 5 0 were locked in an iron box, having cases enclosed, leaving
O 5 0 chambers between t e two cases, and the object was to have
0 5 0 same substance that would give out a moisture upon the appli-
cation of the heat, and the steam thus produced was to be in-
closed in the box and moisten the papers so that they might be
preserved from the effects of fire. There had been several wit-
nesses of respectability on both sides, although several of those
called for the defendant had only recently turned their atten-
tbn to this subject. Several witnesses for the plaintiff said
that, although there had been an addition to the old safe which
consisted merely of a single iron box, a mode having been in-
troduced of having an c titer box, the great object was to in-
troduce some non-conducting substance, so that the operation
of heat might be retarded as much as possible ; but that there
was nothing until Mr. Milner's patent to moisten the papers
by the operation of steam.
On the part of the defendant, he chiefly relied on Mart's and
Chubb's patents, and it would he for them to say whether those
Patents were not confined to introducing non-conductors
The object of bothwas to save papers from destruction, but the
mode and operation was the question in dispute. He had been
puzzled to know the difference between the two patents of Marr
and Chubb, and he afterwards found from one of the witnesses
that there was no distinction between them. They both had
non-conductors in the inner case, but neither seemed to have
had the slightest contemplation of any liquid, as their object
was rather to have substances as dry as possible, but had no
nation of a liquid which was to be condensed into steam to
moisten the papers
,the inner case. They had heard the
_ •

Thomas Chilton
Maxwell Hyslop
Harmood Mimic
Wm. Bennett . •

PAINS IN THE BACK, GRAVEL, LUMBAGO,
RHEUMATISM, GOUT, INDIGESTION, NERVOUSNESS,

C. H. li

DEBILITY, &c.
-FIR. DE ROOS' COMPOUND RENAL PILLS.—
1.3 It is not generally known that the above, and almost
every other affection of the system, are more or less dependent
on impurity of the blood, arising from imprudence or other-
wise. These Pills consist of a combination of medicines, which
act more particularly upon the stomach, blood vessels, and
kidneys, as their name Renal (or the kidneys) indicates, and
through them establish the regular action of the organs, thus
striking at once at the root of the complaint, and purifying the
system. It is a well-known fact that diseases of the skin, &c.,
may be temporarily relieved, and apparently cured, by outward
and violent applications, &c., but the virus remains in the
system, to break out again in a more dreadful form at another
time. An extensive practice in-the above diseases warrants the
Proprietor in asserting that in'no case where this Medicine is
perseveringly taken can i ssibly fail, being compounded on
scientific and infallible inciples, the result of immense prac-
ticable experience.

"The Lady of a iverpoal merchant, after being under the
care of one of t rst physicians in that town for many months
with pains i e back and elsewhere, but to no purpose, was
induced to try a small box of De Roos' Compound Renal Pills,
from which she derived more benefit than from all the medi-
cines ever prescribed for her by her medical attendant. The
truth of the above will be verified by Mr. JONES, 5, Paradise-
street, Liverpool, to whom the lady's Physician candidly made
the avowal."

Henry Clark
William G. LE
J. P. Palmer

V. Groom

Rev. C. If.-1

Thonia
Wm. C

1010— 1 0
1 0
1 o
ch 0
1 0

Kirkpatrick
R. C. Currey
E. Finch ....
?.r Blythe.

Blythe

Constain

CVltirlll7e, HMI IL won't' tie tor tnem to say whether they were
satisfied that the invention which Mr. Milner set out in his
specification was known before the date of his patent. If they
thouzht it was, they would find that issue for the defendant ;
and if they thouxht it was not, they would find it forthe plaintiff.

The third and fourth issues were substantially the seine, being
that Mr. Milner was not the inventor, and the invention was
not new. If Mr. Milner was the inventor, the invention was
new; and if he was not the inventor, it was not new. Then
came the issue of whether it was useful, and he mast say he
had been astonished to find such strong evidence of its useful-
ness. Up to this hour he had no idea that them were any
human means of so effectually preserving papers from the
action of fire. It appeared that, by means of the condensation
of steam, the papers enclosed in the inner box were rendered
moist. It was a comfort for one to know that there was an in-
vention, by which valuable documents might be rendered secure,
notwithstanding the terrible calamity of fire breaking out in a
house. Although the defendant had thoup.ht fit tn env it Ivan

s Solomon

Malleson

Linnington (do
(subscription)
Bowater

Bingham

Vincent

ughton
nation)

Edward Royds
H. Copeland ..
:u REV. C. LAW

hd. Brooke (don,

RR REV, E

not useful, he was reilly at a loss to say what evidence there
was to raise any doubt as to its utility ; but the question was
for them alone. Now came the direction he should give theta
in point of law, and in this they must be guided by what he said.
He thought there might be an infringement, although the de-
fendant did not use vessels, pipes, or tubes for containing the
liquid. All the rest he left to them ; but he only said that it
was not indispensably necessary that the defendant should use
pipes, tubes, or artificial vessels, but they were to consider
whether the evidence was sufficient to convince them that the
defendant had infringed the patent. They would hear in mind
that respectable professors from King's College, and other
seminaries of learning, had been called for the defendant, and
they would consider whether they disproved the infringement.
. .

o 10
o 10
• 10
0 10

ground of infringe-
ntil nearly four years after
hl appear that Harrison sold Tann's
t say that they were not to look to Tann's
fication, if they came to the conclusion that the boxes made

CTORS; •r the He

by the TREAS

lilner's; but if, as it is
oxes, he conk.'

0
_ . .........
by Tann were the same as those Milner described in his specifi-
-0 cation. They were to look on all the evidence on either side
0 bearing on these issues ; and if they thought that, although the
0 boxes that the defendant sold did not contain any pipes, tubes,

or artifici

;els for containing the lic

uid, they'co

alum and other substances from which moisture was to be ex-
tracted by heat; if they thought they were substantially the
same as Milner's, they would find that issue for the plaintiff;
and if they thought they ?fere not the same as Milner's, for the
defendant. They were at liberty to find that issue for the
plaintiff, although the defendant did not nag any pipes, tubes,
or artificial ♦essels. If they thought the process was substan-
tially the same as that mentioned in the plaintiff's specification,
they would And that issue for the plaintiff. They must bear i■
mind that the plaintiff said, "I claim as my invention the in-
troduction or application of the combined effect in chambered
boxes, or depositories of the moisture and material kept humid
in the space surrounding the innermost box, and its contents,

) •

out in any way being confined to the material or liquid
ed, or the manner in which it may be distributed or
arranged, in order to produce the desired effect of protecting
nr'other depositories enclosing papers, or other

a, safes, (

materials, from ire." It was on the construction of these
words that be had directed them in point of law, that the de-
fendant may have infringed the patent, although he did mot
make use of tubes, or pipes, or artificial vessels. With this;
exception, he left it for them to say if the defendant had in-
fringed the patent ; if they found that it was so, damages not
being in dispute, the sum of forty shillings would be sufficient:
eider, themselves, which way they would

find their verd

The Jury, after a short deliberation, said they found their
♦erdict upon all the issues for the plaintiff.
VERDICT FOR THIS PLAINTIFF.
Upon this verdict, estahlisbing the validity of Milner's Pa-
tents, so fully confirmed by his Fronotr the Vice-Chancellor's
decision, farther proceedings in Chancery are being adopted
at.;ainst all parties Salim!, Molding, •r Usimg these Safes er
Beans.

FOR CHILDREN CUTTING THEIR TEETH.
NSON'S AMERICAN SOOTHING
le Remedy has preserved hun-

MRS
ST

~dryfrom Convulsions
is soon as the Syrup is rubbed
-ted, the Gums cooled, and
•-•ek las efficacious,
nd so pleasant, that
its Gums h ibbed'ivith it. When
f four mo it, the Syrup should be
rubbed on And- Pm' S 'should never be without
rue Syrup in the :\ cry whe there are young children ; for
if a Child wakes in tl, night, ith.pains in the Gums, the Syrup
immediately gives ease; thereby preventing Convulsions, Fe
vers, &c.—The great succ&s of this Medicine during the last
Twenty-five Years has ithluced unprincipled persons to imitate
it, under the name op-American Soothing Syrup, and copying
parts of Mrs. Johnsen's -Pitts, Rc Parents will. therefore, he
very particular to ask for JOHNSON'S AMERICAN SOOTH-
ING SYRUP, and to notice that the names of BARCLAY and
SoNs, 95, Farriugdou-street, London, rto whom Mrs. Johnson
has sold the recipe,) are on the Stamp affixed to each Bottle.

arising from
on the Gums,
the intlamma
tending• to tn.

John Andrews, Abersychan, Pontypool.—" After taking a
box of your Pills, I am so much better that I am induced to
send for another."

Mr. Milton Welch, Furness.—" Your Renal Pills are the
only medicine I have met with that have been of service."
Mr. T. Bloem, Limekiln-street, Dover.—" Please to send a
few more of your wonderful Pills. My wife feels great relief
already."

Mr. Westmacott, 4. Market-street, Manchester.—" Your
medicines are very highly spoken of by all who have purchased
them of me."

Mr. Smith, Titnes Office, Leeds.—" One person informs me
that your Renal Pills are worth a guinea a box."
2, Buckingham Place, Brighton.—" Major Micklethwait
thinks it but justice to Dr. De Roos and his invaluable Medi-
cine, to inform him that he had suffered very much from pains
in the back and loins, which induced him to try the Renal
Pills, after which he finds himself /mite free from pain, Szc."
N.B. Persons wishing to consult the doctor by letter must
send a detail of the symptoms, &c., with the usual fee of
by post-office order, payable at the Holborn Office, for which
the necessary medicines and advice will be sent to any part of
the world.

the Chi

It 'is as Mail

Teeth with

Address, WALTER DE Roos, M.D., 35, Ely Place, Holborn
Hill, London, where he may be consulted from 10 till 1, and 4
till 8, Sunday excepted, unless by previous arrangement.
May be obtained at Is. lid., 2s. 9d., 4s. 6d., lie., and 335.,
per box, through all Medicine Vendors in the three Kingdoms,
or should any difficulty occur, they will be sent free on receipt
of the price in postage stamps by DR. DE Roos.
CAUTION.—A self-styled ten shilling Doctor (unblushing
impudence being his only qualification) is now advertising un-
der a different name, a highly injurious imitation of these Pills,
and a uselesS abbreviated copy of Dr. De Roos' celebrated
Medical Adviser, slightly changing its title: sufferers will
therefore do well to see that the stamp round each box is a
bona fide government stamp, not a base counterpart, and to
guard against the truthless statements of this individual, which
are published only for the basest purposes of deception on
invalids and fraud on the proprietor.
TO PREVENT FRAUD on the public by imitations of the
above valuable medicine, her Majesty's Honourable Commis-
sioners of Stamps have directed the name of the proprietor, in
white letters on a red ground, to be engraved on the goyern-
ment stamp round each box, without which none are genuine,
and to imitate which too closely is felony and transportation.
N.B.—Should difficulty occur in obtaining the above, enclose
the price in postage stamps to the Establishment.
Sold by Mr. JONES, 5, PARADISE-STREET, LIVERPOOL, and
obtainable through all others.