The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1851-11-04 00:00:00

m alonc

ant
id. 1 the r

tubes, or artificial vessels, but they were to consider
he evidence was sufficient to convince them that the
; bad infringed the patent. They would bear in mind
ectable professors from King's College, and other
s of learning, had been called for the defendant, and
I consider whether they disproved the infringement.
only be evidence on the ground of infringe-
t taken out until nearly four years after
it wont(' a spear that Harrison sold Tann's
say that they were not to look to Tann's
came to the conclusion that the boxes made
were the same as those Milner described in his specifi-
were to look on ail the evidence on either side
,se issues; and if they thought that, although the
defendant sold did not contain any pipes, tubes,
neje for containing the liquid, they contained
r substances from which moisture was to be ex-
st ; if they thought they were substantially the
, they would find that issue for the plaintiff;
ht they were not the same as Milner's, for the
,y were at liberty to find that issue for the
the defendant did not use. any pipes, tubes,
ls. .If they thought the process was substan-
that mentioned in the plaintiff's specification,
bat issue for the plaintiff. They must bear in
sintiff said, " I claim as my invention the in-
plication of the combined effect in chambered
ories of the moisture and material kept humid
ounding the innermost box, and its contents.
Tay being confined to the material or liquid
e ;manner in which it may be distributed or
I. in order to produce the desired effect of protecting
or other depositories enclosing papers, or other
fire." It was on the construction of these
ad directed them in point of law, that the de-
infringed the patent, although be did not
or pipes, or artificial vessels. With this
n to say if the defendant had in-
_ found that it was so, damages not
sum of forty shillings would he sufficient:
eider, themselves, which way they would

he cou'd

for the
if they

short deliberation

verdicttUPOU all the issues for the plaintiff.
VERDICT FOR THI PLAINTIFF.
Upon this verdict, establishing the validity of Milner's Pa-
tents, so fully confirmed by his Honour the Vice-Chancellor's
decision, further proceedings in Chancery are being adopted
ties Selling, Holding, or Using these safes or

FOR CHILDREN CUTTING THEIR TEETH.
A/Rs. JOHNSON'S AMERICAN SOOTHING
111_ SYRUP.—This infallible Remedy has preserved hun-
lreds of Children when thought past reeovary from Convulsions

arising from p.iintul dentition. AS soon as ine ,y rap 13 uui,vu
on the Gums, the Child will be relieved, the Gums cooled, and
the inflammation reduced. It is as innocent as efficacious,
tending to proauce the Teeth with ease ; and so pleasant, that
no Child will refuse to let its Gums be rubbed with it. When
infants are at the age of four months, the Syrup should be
rubbed on the Gums ; and Patents- should never be, without

the Syrup in the Niiriery where there are young children ; for
e if a Child wakes in the night wOh pains in the Gums, the Syrup
immediately gives ease ; thereby preventing Convulsions, Fe
vers, &c.—the great succe of this Medicine during the last
Twenty-five Years has in ced unprincipled persons to imitate
it, under the name of erican Soothing Syrup, and copying
parts of Mrs. Johnso s Bills, Sze. Parents whi, therefore, he
----- particular to a for JOHNSON'S AMERICAN SOOTH-
SYRUP,
.an to notice that the names of BARCLAY and
;, 95. Farm' on-street, London, (to whom Mrs. Johnsen
has sold the recipe,) are on the Stamp affixed to each Bottle.