The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1835-01-13 00:00:00

THE NEW PARLIAMENT.

The following list exhibits the 'politics of the newly-returned
members as far as they can be ascertained from their declared
principles, or previous votes in parliame4t.

7.74 e first column show: the number pf whits, reulicals, or destructires ;-the
second column the ?lumber a/ conserrative whigt, or coniervalsres.

Andover-.—R. Etwall, con. whig ; Sir J. Pollen, con. 0 2
Abingdon—Thomas Duffield
Ashburton—C. Lushington 1 U
Arundel—Lord D. C. Stewart
Ashton—Hindley 1 0
Brecon—C. M. it. Morgan
Bodtnin—Major Vivian; Sir S. Spy, con. wing
Bury, Lancashire—R. Walker 1 0
Barnstable—Major Fanconrt, con.; Chichester, con. whig 0 2
Bridgenorth—Whitmore, Pigott ....
Bath—Gen. Palmer, whig; Roebuck, rad. 2 0
Boston —B ro wnr igg, con.; Wilks, rad.
Beverly—Hogg. con.; Burton, con. whig. 0 2
Bradford—Hardy; Lister
Bridport—Warburton, rad.; Twiss, cons.
Bridgewater—Tynte, Leader 2 0
Brighton—Peechell, con. whig; Wigney, rad..." . 1 1
Bolton—Billing, con.; Ainsworth, con. whig -
Bristol—Vyvyan, C. J. Miles 0 2
Bury St. Edmunds—Lord Jermyu; Lord Fitzroy
Bedford—
Banhury—Tancred i U 1
Bewdley—Sir 'l. E. Winnington 0 0
Buckingham—Sir Thos. Fremantle; Sir 11. Verney ••• • 1 1
Beaumaris—Capt. F. Paget, vrhig
_.. • ,• - - 1 0

Dunkin,
,erwiek—J. Bradshaw, Sir R. Dunkin, con 0 2
Canterbury—Lord A. Cunningham; Villiers
Cardiff—J. Nichull

Cardigan—Pryse Prvse, con. whig
Christchurch—G. W. Tapps, con. whig
Cirencester—J. Cripps, whig; Lord E. Somerset, con.
Chichester—Lord A. Leunox, con. whig; J. A. Smith, c 0 '2
Carmarthen—Lewis
__ .

Carlisle—Marshall, whig ; Howard, wbig • 2 0
Chatham—Sir J. Beresford 0 1
Cheltenham—Hon. C. Berkeley
Colchester—R. Sanderson, Sir G. H. Smyth 0 2
Coventry—Ellis, whig ; Williams, rad.
Chippenharn—J. Neeld, H. G. Bolders, cons.
Cockerrnouth—Dykes, Aglionby, rads.
Devonport—Codrington, Grey, whigs 2 0
Derby—Strutt, Ponsonby, whigs
Frome—Shepherd, con.; Brides, whig
Dorchester—lion. A. Cooper,ll. Williams
Devizes—W. Locke, con. whig; Sir P. Durham, con.
Dudley—T. Hawked 0 1
Dover—Fector, Sir J. R. Reid 0 2
Denbigh—Jones
Dartmouth—Col. Seale, whig
Droitwich—W. Barnaby
Exeter—Sir W. Follett, con.; Divett, rad. ..... I 1
Evesham—Sir C. Cockerell, J. Borthwick 0 2
Eve—Sir E. Kerrison
.
Finsbury—Duncombe, J. Wakley 2 0
Guildford—Mangles, whig; Baring Wall, con 1 1
Grinsby.—Heneage 0 1
Gloucester.—Hope, con.; Berkeley, rad.. l I
Grantham.—Tolemache, G. E. Welby - 0 2
Greenwich.—Angerstein, con.; Barnard, con. whig ••• • 0 2.
Gateshead—R ippon, rad 1 0
Helston—Lord John Townsend, con 0 1
Hythe—S. Majoribanks, con. "whig 0 1
Halifax.—Wood, rad.; Wortley. con
Harwich.—l. C. Herries, Bentham 0 2
Huntingdon.—Sir F. Pollock, Col. Peel
Ilastings.—F. North, H. Elphinstone ..• • 2 0
Horsham.-11. Hurst, whig
H ult.—Carruthers, con.; Hutt, rad 1 1
Hereford.—Clive, con.; Biddulph, rad.
Honiton.—Colonel Bailie, eon.; Chichester, con. whig• • 0 2
Hertford—Lord Mahon, Hon. W. Cowper, con.-whig . •• 0 2
Huddersfield—John Blackburne, Es 4., whig
Ipswich—F. Kelly, Dundas
Kendal—.T. Barnharn, whig • • I 0
Kidderminster—Phillips, rad 1 0
Knaresborough—Lawson, con.; Hutch, whig
Leeds—Beckett, con.; Baines, red
Lewis—Blunt, Kemp, whigs 2 0
Lancaster—Greene, con ; Stewart, red
Launceston—Sir H. Hardinge, con
Lyme-Regis—W. Pinney, rad
Leicester—Serjt. Goulburn, Gladstone, eons 0 2
Ludlow—Lbrd Clive, E. L. Charlton, cons.
Litchfield—Sir G. Anson, Sir E. Scott, con. whigs 0 2
Liskeard—C. Buller
..
Liverpool—Lord Sandon, con.; \V. Ewart, rad.
Lynn—Lord G. Bentinck, Sir S. Canning . 0 2
Lincoln—Colonel Sibthorpe, con.; Bu/wer, rad
Leominster—Lord Hotham, con.; Bish, rail.
Lymington—J. Stewart, W. A. Mackinnon 0 2
London—Wood, Pattison, Crawford, Grote
Lambeth—Hawes, Tennyson
Marlow—Clayton, Williams, con. whigs 0 2
Marlborough—Lord E. Bruce, 11. Baring 0 2
Montgommery—J. Edwards, wbig
Maldon—Q. Dick, con.; Lennard, con. whig 0 2
Malton—Pepys, Ramsden
Maidestone—Lewis, con.; Roberts, rad 1 1
Malmsbury—Lord Andover, con. whig
Midhurst—W. S. Poyutz, con: whig
Marylebone—Sir S. Whalley, H. Bulwer,.rad
Merthyr Tydvil—J. J. Guest, whig • 1 0
Manchester—P. Thomson, Mark Philips, rads 2 0
Newcastle-under-Lvne—E. Peel, H. Millar
Newcastle-upon-Tyne—Sir M. W. Ridley; Ord
Norwich—Lord Stormont, K. C. Scarlett . . . 0 2
Newport (1. W.)—Sir W. Gordon, W. Orde . . -
Northampton—V. Smith, con. whig; C. Ross, con 0 2
Newark—W. E. Gladstone, con.; Seargt. Wilde, rad 1 1
Northallerton—Wrightson, con. whig
Nottingham—Sir 11.C.Ferguson,Sir J. C. Hobhouse,whigs 2 0
Oldham—Cobbett, J. Fielden
Oxford University—Sir R. 11. Inglis, Estcourt
Oxford Citv.—Hughes, whig; Maclean, con 1 1
Portsmouth.—B. Carter, F. Baring 2 0
Pembroke.—Colonel Owen 0 1
Pontefract. —J. Gully, rad.; Lord Pollington, con 1 1
Peterborough—Fazakerley, Heron, rads
Petersfield.—C. Hector, rad
Poole.----Sir J. Byng' C. A. Tulke, whigs 2 0
Plymouth.—Colher,Bewes whigs
Penryn —Freshfield, con.;' Rolfe, whig 1 1
Preston—Fleetwood, con.; Stanley I 1
Radnor.—R. Price
Richmond.—Hon. S. Dundas, A. Speirs, whigs
Ripon.—Sir C. Dalbiac, C. Pemberton 0 2
Reading.—Sergeaut Talfourd, rad.; C. Russell, con 1 1
Reigate.—Lord Eastnor 0 1
Rochdale—J. Entwisie . . -
0 I
'
Rye—E. B. Curteis • 0 1
Rochester—Bernal, Ilodges, whigs
Swansea—J. H. Vivian, con o'' 1
Sunderland—Ald. Thompson, con.; G. Barclay, whig
South Shields—l. Ingham •0 1
Stafford—H. Goodriche, con.; Chet wynd, cons. whig 0 2
Sandwich—G. I'rice, con.; Sir 'l'. Trowbridge, rad 1 1
Sheffield—Parker, Buckingham
Southampton—Hoy, Dottin
Stroud-I'. Scrope, Col. Fox - 2 0
Stamford—Col. Chaplin, H. Finch 0 2
St. Albans—Hon. W. Grimston, cons.; Ward, whig ..• • 1 1
Sudbury—J. Bagshaw, B. Smith, rads.
Southwark—D. W. Harvey, .1. Humphrey, rads 2 0
Stoke-on-Trent—lleatheote, Davenport, wiligs
Salisbury—Capt. Brodie, rad.; Wyndham, cons. 1 1
Shaftesbury—J. Poulter, rad 1 0
Shoreham—Sir W. Burrell, Goring., cons. whig
Scarborough—French, eon. ; Johnson. whig 1 1
St. Ives—lames Hulse - 1 0
Salford—Brotherton .
Shaftesbury—Poulter, whig ,_• Best, con. .l 1
Tower Hamlets—W. Clay, Dr. Lushingtou, rads
Tamworth—Sir R. Peel, W. Y. Peel
Tauuton—Labouchere, Bainbridge, rads.
Thetford—Lord Boston, cons. wing ; 11. Baring, cons 0 2
Tewkesbury—W. Dowdeswell, C. H. Tracey
Totness—Lord Seymour, cons. whig; J. Parrott, whig
Tynemouth—G. It; Young 0 1
Ttursk—S. Crompton
Westminster—Burdett," Old Glory," Col. Evans, rads 2 0
Wallingford—W. S. Blackstone
Warrington-1. I. Blackburne 0 1
Westbury—Sir R. Lopez , 0 1
Whitehaven—M. Attwood - 0 1
Whitby—A. Chapman - 0 1
Wakeheld—D. Gaskell
Walsall—C. S. Forster
Wigan—Kearsleyi cons.; Potter, red
Wycombe—Hon. J. Smith, Col. Grey, cons. whigs 0 2
Worcester—Robinson, cons. whig; Bailey, cons 0 2
Warwick—Sir C. Greville, cons.; B. King, rad 1 1
Woodstock—Lord C. S. Churchill
Wenlock—Hon. C. Forrester, D. Gaskell 0 2
Windsor—J. Ramsbottotn, cons. whig; De Beauvoir, rad 1 1
Wareham—J. H. Calcraft 0 1
Wilton—J. IL Penruddock
Wells—J. L. Lee, N. R. Colburue 0 0
York—J. H. Lowther, cons., Dundas, cons. whig.
Yarmouth—Baring, W. M. Freed, cons•
W olverhampton—Thornely, Villiers, rads • 2 u
Wiuchester— East, cons.; 13itriug, cons. wbig

T.HE GENERAL ELECTION.

MIDDLESEX,

The nomination of candidates fur Middlesex takes place on
Monday, and' it is with great satisfaction we are enabled to
state our confident expectation that the result of the election
will spare the county the degradation of reckoning as one of its
representatives Mr.'Joseph Hume. If promises are to be relied
on, if the rallying round a candidate of all that is independent
and respectable of the constituency can augur success, Mr.
Wood is as secure of his election as if the sheriff had returned
him. We are not surprised at this ; the constituency is at
length alarmed, and truly, when we look at the results of the
metropolitan boroughs, not without cause. Messrs. Duncombe,
Harvey, Humpherv, Wakley, Lushingtou, and Co. may be .very
fit representatives of " the pressure from without;" but if their
very names do not make those tremble who have anything to
lose,. or who still think that a monarchy is something worth pre-
serving, no appeal/from us will rouse them from their apathy.
Mr. Wood's success will reflect honour on the electors. It is
something to displace such a man as Hume ; but to fill his seat
by a gentleman of high and honourable character, of large pro-
perty, of talent, and habits of business, will give a tone to the
county elections that cannot but have the most beneficial effect.
Again we entreat the electors to Tally round Mr. Wood on
Monday next. The rabblement who surround the hustings will
of course shout and scream for their idol, their wooden idol;
but the poll will decide, and wo doubt not most triumphantly,
that in electing Mr. Wood the electors of Middlesex prefer mo-
narchy to anarchy, and conservative reform to reckless spolia-
tiou.—Morniny Post, Saturday.