The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1843-08-29 00:00:00

ARRIVAL OF THE EX-REGENT OF SPAIN.

Her Majesty's war steamer Prometheus, commander
Frederick Lowe, arrived off Woolwich dockyard on Wed-
nesday morning, having on board General Espartero and
suite.

Sir Francis Collier immediately proceeded on board the
Prometheus, and having been introduced to his Highness,
Sir Francis, on the part of the government, at once ex-
plained to the regent that every accommodation, both to
himself and his suite, would be most gladly rendered,
carriages for the conveyance of himself and suite to town
being in readiness.
His Highness, however, declined the offer, having pre-
viously arranged to embark in a small above-bridge
steamer for Hungerford-wharf, where the carriages of the
Embassy would be in attendance to receive him. His
highness added, that he wished his visit to be as private
as possible.
His Highness, who appeared to be in remarkably good
health and spirits, conversed in the French language for
some time with Sir Francis Collier, and took occasion to
express to that gallant officer in unmeasured terms his
gratitude for the extreme kindness he had experienced
from the British authorities, from the moment he placed
his foot on board the Malabar ship of war.
The Duchess of Victory and the Lady Elidia Espar-
tero (the Regent's daughter) also expressed their acknow-
ledgments.
Despatches were immediately forwarded to London,
announcing the Regent's arrival at Woolwich.
Lord Bloomfield, commander of the Royal Arsenal;
arrived at the Dock-yard shortly after 12 o'clock, and
went off to pay his respects to General Espartero.
Shortly before two o'clock the Waterman Company's
steamer (No. 9) went alongside the Prometheus for the
purpose of receiving his Highness and suite, and having
taken the whole of them on board, at once proceeded to
Hungerford-wharf, where carriages were in waiting to
convey the noble exiles to Mivart's Hotel.

The Duke of Wellington, Sir R. Peel, and many per-
sons of consequence called on General Espartero imme-
diately after his arrival in London.

In compliance with a requisition from the Common
Council of London, the Lord Mayor has fixed Friday
next for a special ourt, to welcome Don Espartero to
this country.

COMMERCIAL TREATY WITH BRAZIL.— Chevalier
Aranjo Ribeira has arrived in town. This 'gentleman is
charged by the Brizilian government with authority to
re-open negociations with her Majesty's government for
the purpose of effecting a new commercial treaty between
Great Britain and the empire of the Brazils.—Globe.
IMPORTANCE OF WATER TIGHT BULKHEADS.—The
Margaret of Hull, a large and powerful steamer, intended
for the African trade, struck on a rock near Oban, on
Tuesday, when on her passage from Hull to Liverpool.
The damage sustained was so great that the water in-
stantly rushed in, and in less than ten minutes the fore-
hold was completely filled. Fortunately the vessel was
divided into water tight compartments, and being thus
saved from sinking, was got into port at Oban. The
Margaret is quite new. She had a cargo on board for Li-
verpool, but no passengers; and the forehold being filled
with casks of oil, the cargo is little injured. The whole
damage will, we are informed, be repaired at a cost of lit-
tle more than £loo.—Leeds Intelligences.

ASSIZE DITELLIGEACE.

SOUTH LANCASHIRE SUMMER ASSIZES.

CROWN COURT.-TUESDAY.

Mr. Justice WIGHTMAN took his seat at nine o'clock.

BURGLARY.

Benjamin Kino, aged 21, and George Crossley, 18,
were charged with having, at Todmorden, on the 31st of
October last, feloniously and burglarionsly broken and
entered the dwelling-house of James Scholefield, and
stolen therefrom six knives and forks, twelve pairs of
scissors, and other articles, the property of the said Jas.
Scholefield.

George Medcalf, now a labourer at Manchester, stated
that he was, on the 9th of November, under sentence in
the New Bailey prison, at Manchester, when the prisoners
were placed there. Three or four days after they were
placed there, King entered into conversation with him in
the presence of two men, Roose and Potts. King de-
scribed to him the manner in which they got into Schole-
field's shop, and the property which they took. They
said they had pawned th, goods at various places. They
pawned one half-dozen knives and forks at Peirson's for
sixpence; a Macintosh, a pistol, and a dozen knives and
forks, at a shop in Withy-grove ; and a top-coat at ano-
ther place. Crossley took part in the conversation occa-
sionally.
The jury found the prisoners guilty, and they were sen-
tenced to ten years' ti anspnrtation.
Jesse Howarth, 26, Robert Milburn, 35, John Hughes,
31, Richard Entwistle, 22, and Benjamin Ingham, 48,
were charged with having, at Tottington-Lower-End,
feloniously and hurglariously broken and entered the
dwelling-house of Ann Heap.
It appeared by the evidence that traces of footsteps were
found from Ann Heap's hoirse in a direct line, with a slight
interruption, to a house where the whole of the prisoners
were proved to have been together.
Mr. Sergeant MURPHY and Mr. WILKINS addressed
the jury in favour of the prisoners, and the jury acquitted
them.

John Scholes, aged 24, was charged with having, on
the 2nd December, 1840, at Tottington-Lower-End, fe-
loniously and burglariously broken and entered the dwell-
ing-house of John Barlow, and stolen therefrom a shawl
and handkerchief, a pair of stockings, &c., the property
of the said John Barlow.

It appeared from the evidence for the prosecution, that
on the 2nd December, 1840, Mrs. Barlow in the middle
of the night saw a light through some chinks in the floor
of the room in which she and the family slept ; thinking
that the house was on fire she gave the alarm, and her
daughter got up, ard, looking through a hole in the floor,
saw the prisoner. He was known by the name of Lomax,
and as he ran away, Miss Barlow called after him—" Ah !
I know thee, Lomax." He bad been employed by Mr.
Barlow. He absconded immediately after, and was not
apprehended till July last.
The prisoner was sentenced to twelve months' impri-
sonment and hard labour.
WOUNDING, &C.
-•- -

Richard Sutcliffe, aged 38, was charged with having,
at Todmordcn, maliciously and feloniously wounded
Mary Sutcliffe, his wife.
It appeared that the prisoner, who is a stone-cutter.
was in the habit of getting intoxicated, The prosecutrix
and he had been married fifteen years. Mrs. Sutcliffe
took in washing. On the night of Saturday, the 10th of
June last, she was taking home some clothes, when she
met her husband, who had had some drink. He ques-
tioned her as to where she was going, and ultimately
compelled her to return with him, though she was anxious
to attend to her business. When they got home he bolted
the door, and she assisted him to undress and put him to
bed. He ordered her to go to bed, but she said she could
not till she had delivered all her clothes and attended to
her household duties. He said she must stop his time,
and she complied, and remained till she thought he was
asleep, and then returned to her work as she bad done
many a time before. She took her shoes and her apron
in her hand, and went away and delivered her clothes,
and purchased some potatoes and coals. When she re-
turned he was up. She hesitated about going in, being
afraid, but at length he heard her, and ordered her to enter.
As soon as she entered he took her by the dress, and
threw her on the floor. He bolted the door, and punched
(or kicked) her on her back and breast. He beat her
with his fist on the head. She scrambled up many times.
and he knocked her down again. He knocked her head
violently against both the wall and 11,or, saying he would
beat her till she would not know him. He asked her if
she knew him. She replied "Yes." He said " Who
am I? " She said "It 's Dick." He said he would not
be called Dick, and he beat her still more. She then
called him Richard, but he still beat her. lie lifted her
up, carried her up stairs, and threw her on a chair, and
asked her it' she knew him. She said she did, and begged
him to give over, saying, " I am done." He immediately
dashed her on the floor and kicked her again, having all
the time his clogs on. He lifted her up and dashed her
to the ground, when her head caught the wall. Some of
the skin and hair adhered thereto. Her head was sorely
cut in five or six places. Ile at last took her up and threw
her on the bed, where she lay helpless. He went to bed
himself, and lay till morning. 'Witness stated that she
was about a month unable to move. The prisoner said
the reason why he locked the door when he beat her was,
that on former occasions she had run away before he was
satisfied.

The jury found the prisoner guilty of maliciously
wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm.
The JUDGE animadverted on the cruelty of the priso-
ner in committing such an unprovoked assault, and sen-
tenced him to fifteen years' transportation.

DISCHARGE OF THE GRAND JURY.
At a quarter before four o'clock to-day, there being no
more bills to go before the Grand Jury, they entered the
court and were discharged.

NISI PHIUS COURT.-TUESDAY.
Mr. Justice Cresswell took his seat at nine o'clock, and
immediately after proceeded with the case of

(HAVANT V. BAILEY,
Which had been left in an unfinished state at the rising
of the court on the preceding evening.
Witnesses having been called to prove that a machine
was not of the dimensions ordered, and that it was inca-
pable of performing its work, Mr. Knowles replied.
His Lordship charged the Jury, who returned a verdict
for the plaintiff, damages £250, costs 40s.

ACTION FOR DEFAMATION.-STANLEY V. ASCOLI.
This was an action for defamation, brought by the
plaintiff, Joseph Stanley, against the defendant, Guiseppe
Angelo Ascoli, commission merchant, at Manchester.
The declaration contained five counts, in which the plain-
tiff alleged that the defendant had imputed robbery to
him in disposing of certain bales of silk.

. ,
The defendant pleaded not guilty.
Mr. Dundas, Mr. Worthy, and Mr. Pollock, appeared
for the plaintiff, and Mr. Baines for the defendant.
After the examination of one or two witnesses,
His Lordship suggested the propriety of having a set-
tlement made.

A short consultation then took place place between
counsel on both sides, at the close of which,
Mr. Baines said that his client was willing to withdraw
the justification and imputation of felony or dishonesty
to the plaintiff, who had, under a mistaken notion of his
rights. though irregularly, entered into the transaction
The defendant, he said, was willing to withdraw a juror.
Mr. Dundas assented to the arrangement.
His Lordship thought the plaintiff had pursued an im-
prudent course in the transaction.
A juror was then withdrawn.
COLLINS V. WILLIAMSON.
This was an action of defamation brought by the plain-
tiff, Charles Collins, against the defendant, James Wil-
liamson, for having charged him with the forgery of a
receipt.

ML Dundas and Mr. Pollock appeared for the plaintiff;
and Mr. Whigham for the defendant.
Mr. Dundas stated the case. The plaintiff was a
gentleman of considerable property, who married a Miss
Mottershead, the daughter of a pawnbroker, in Salford.
who died in the year 1842. The defendant was a school-
master at Salford, who made a claim of 235. for schooling
an illegitimate child of the late M. Mottershead, which
claim, with 3s. 6d. costs, Mrs. Mottershead, paid after
her husband's death. The defendant gave a receipt, but,
after Mr. Mottershead's death, he sent another bill for
the same amount to the plaintiff, and sued him in the
Couat of Requests. The judge of the court, after having
seen the before-mentioned receipt, dismissed the claim,
but shortly after the defendant said that it was a wrong
receipt, that he had never signed it, and that it had been
forged by the plaintiff, whom he was determined to indict
at the next Liverpool Assizes.
After the examination of witnesses,
Mr. WHIGHAM addressed the jury, stating that the
receipt had been inrerlined, and that the defendant might
reasonably have believed it to be a forgery.
A verdict was returned for the plaintiff, damages 40s.

LORD V FERRAND.
This was an action brought for the recovery of the
amount of a promissory note for £2OO, with interest
thereon. The defendant pleaded payment, and the statute
of limitations.

Verdict for the plaintiff for the amount claimed.
The court adjourned at a quarter to six o'clock.

CROWN COURT.--WEDNESDAY.
Mr. Justice WIGIITMAN took his seat at nine o'clock.
STABBI NG.
William Dowdall , 40, was charged with having, on the
4th July last, on the road between Eccleston and Prescot,
stabbed William Tickle.
It appeared that Tickle was with a friend, on his way
home to Eccleston, on the day in question, when the pri-
soner came up and rubbed against him. Some slight
altercation ensued, and in a few minutes the prisoner
struck the prosecutor a blow with some sharp instrument.
The blow was repeated, and Tickle received two cuts, one
on the eye and another on the temple. The prisoner ran
off. A crowd collected, and he was in a few minutes ap-
prehended by the police. He had, when taken, a dagger
in his hand. With this instrument it appeared he had
inflicted the wounds in question.
The prisoner, it appeared, was a very hot politician.
He entered into a statement of a long rambling descrip-
tion, averring that he was in danger from the liberal party ;
that he had performed various public services, and carried
the dagger for self defence. The prisoner called several
persons, who gave him a good character. Mr. Langshaw,
proprietor of the Conservative News-room in this town,
said the prisoner was a very good man, rather warm on
political subjects, and one of the warmest and best subjects
her Majesty had.
The jury found the prisoner guilty of a common assault.
His LORDSHIP said it was very fortunate for the pri-
soner that the jury had taken this view of the case. If
the jury had found him guilty of the more grave offence,

......................................•"""'""1".""
ttotncpeadsstsheenpterritscoeneort
itoratwriseplvoertmatuionno.3s,Hie I •-•• 0
Joss'p/s Shacii;,:rithei9:ti,
he (the learned judge) would have considee; pop Sett
lA, /1.6 E
37, OFw Ms
met 0
ter of Abraham; Lawton, at Bolton. Der ft,
It appea rtfd that the deceased and the priso
d tbe Al
place called the Willows. The deceased urgelefiori,
soner to wrestle and to fight. They did wrest ts strip
fight afterwards ; the prisoner, who appeared bu ~,. ;
fell upon his head. He was carrted insenslho(7oo,:
weakly, and very stupid man, threw the deeeB9l°- 'Ott
public-house at hand, where be died in a feWrisoper
was found that his neck was broken. The es'usl• :040
Ac
charged
described as a very inoffensive, but soft
Of
The jury acquitted the prisoner, being of 1;01S
he acted in self-defence, and that the decease,
teb, r
wi jth"
dentally killed. The prisoner was lrawledij . ,
hua,Biinbgbyielso2a,ioaussilyiarapt:dloobkair:.
Ig.Aervrl:itifiEPtlirbi:rol:o9loll: •
charged.
BURGLARY. 4 Cb°ll.
dwelling-house of John Dalton, 'at Malle"-,sper".,
8,a., the P.- ' '
stolen therein certain hams, baco,
oglafreilole°7l!' wila,-I,ettetier,„34
tip
the said John Dalton. f AP ..A
Mr. John Dalton stated that on the 16th e,, bilk'
made his house secure and went to bed. is bou;e1101 ~
two o'clock he was disturbed by hearing tlitbraegb 0
dow opened. He went to the parlour, lookeie, r 01240
window, saw two men rush out of his celled t>
glint
across the garden towards the Ashton new,rfe the 0101
jumped out of the window and followed. uneatioo•4,
saw some ducks lying, which attracted his alt sppn°o
and said whatever was wrons,
tookpiisoil:ti.sr
ill:), rase
eainddwrh, rode inhe
had differentseen dtitiree catviorios:r
boi000:4
the police of what had occurred. On hie,als tie
standing close to the hedge, as if concea"eg 8000,10.,
sormeonreturn
Witnessutsherter;,o,
llftii
to the
etsethe
;hei
izeonepnidwii
eogthuohwisfeeeahtsphhtreerhi sefedooc
uourni t
!:enekerdn.rs
:t
ihdhaaHa.
ndt e.
iltlls
atei
sd,eawoi rd
Some
its esbdeeibeoesinn:Birejn:lt
one, 1
rpo.
it;7,ooiir
to;
rtbwrheaheAaseripart
soil,
rhbei erviaicvicsokekusil
-kiln.
convictionndp a. r
evTpe brstolen
ieti
fowls
pbwhfi
werae
:Is
sgmrt
af• heeobbaeawedtdtel was p 0
119
direction tbv:as
y:e°.anbc:: :L: . gib.
dwiirlebctwioans taken
tried byb tefhoerethiLebverds A
binv.
at,.notow:
..1
'silver
la
Barnard
esr en t erc sentenced tihoi
ey t,
ye
arn 0
The jury found the prisoner' guilty. Pubes
, the
toeP.
)
assizes ; and sentenced to 18 months imp r'" •.att
THbeehoaidd tswhooepsafioruonfd
Manchester burglarious-1v broken into theasu„-o-bet
of Henry Wolff, shoe dealer, Deansgate, -"--;ett s
stolen fifteen pairs of shoes, a silver creart4lOslir
A us ry „o,m,
The spoons, '
prisoner was stopped during the nig,". 9,4 i..,_
eypdeeartr! OfwmtaPhsrei selhniainrge....;dl t-
o.::itell,liiii,:;fr4
shoes on his feet. Mrs. Unity Wolff Prerbooltittr
shoes were part of them stolen from her hf.aasa'e'o. .-/
prisoser exactly. ,i ..il
srtatie-'110")
He was sentenced to ten years' flaw__ Ls I/.
Robert Harrison, 16, John Solon, 20, iiiii.are chinel.
George Ward, 41, and Ann Harrison, 43' [aasile-qed
with having, at Ashton-neder • L •ne stolenburgl Ithe
the dwelling-house of James Fletcher,)' Oa lb' ..
City of apparel.h
rred fa
shoes
etsheinprheismhisensdws:u- iee4l7,
Ann Harrison was C 8 °
..gbitr
feloniously received the same. ,be,_ 0
Robert Harrison and Georg Ward were forth b0a..11 0/
with having broken into a building within l 3
Henry Lees's dwelling-house and stolen I.' risioll i
six hens. Ann Harrison was Charged with reee 40
also.
Sarah Harrison, 21, was charged with "'' 'be
00126
part of Fietcher's property. guilty Lid
Harrison,
glary. foci colli
he 0
Ann Harrison was acquitted of receiving !Ity, ° „,'
with the other prisonerwho d not PI IP',
leaded n , 55004.•
vieted of the offence first charged. ~ 5 t ,too,r
Robert Harrison was sentenced to ten Ye--.r„ 12 'ry,
tion ; ,`S.olom and H urst were sentences wisstiO,P;tl."
imprisonment ; George Ward to night Wet'. risoPcoei
-, •ffip- , '
ment ; Sarah Harrison to nine months
~,,eat• - 1
and Ann Harrison to six months' imprisenT-00110014,
William Hall, 22, and George Boot/1,410d, strl,
with having burglariously entered the d'"'insf ~i. AL
James Millar, at Manchester, and stolen a ~.editv; iir'
Hall was found guilty, and Booth pod 'a*itittr .
previous conviction was read and pro, ao. , , . •
He was sentenced to ten years' transportatia '
/010
satiat revs'a,
MANSLAU-lITSR. lb 1111 ati 'i
iT,hh
eomjuNa
jury
ylsßa
Ica
qxpueßirt)t:euad/set,hce2o7p.ruiv:•RoansTe.tib.avcrgisedpi,:vidiab.l
01,
Wigan, killed a child named William Meada--' ' ' '
)
a cart over it.
o°l'. ' A
WILLETT V. LAW AND CO'ht, to. f
)01:110'
This was an action in replevin, brougbt,-0/sbas 01 .
William Willett, against the defendants, 0, r thePtie 4
Joseph Buckley. Mr. Brandt appeared for
tbehelli
and Mr. Cowling, who orened the case, '4, be_tovi,
ants. It appeared that Mr. Law claimed `t,ftattsitt
lord of a cottage occupied by the plaintiff, lash f,etrif„,
and that be put in a distress, in October 130.0 broof
rears of rent which were then due. Theo t TO fej ,l;
Buckley, was the bailiff on the occasion.d pie ' '
denied that Mr. Law was the landlord, en
there were not any arrears of rent due.d s!'" ~.
A verdict was returned for the dot'' • j, •
sti
SCAWIN V. COCKBURN, rbryorkior ~.'
This was an action against the Dean o
ntitl
consent, a verdict was taken for the Plei
damages, and 40s. costs. f Of,
SEDDON V. WOODWARD. „.., 0 ts t, s
This was an action brought for the recovlbast!!, ,
of certain, coal mines, which, after the stake ,i
case, ended in the withdrawal of a juror. r •
1 vb (01,34
BLACKBURN 17. GAST Su' 100.--(1,106-
This was an action brought by Joh►n, ''t.. 0010105 F
and colliery surveyor, at Oldham• against
of".
William Davis, of Chester, for the recover! 00100 ,
£lB, damages sustained by a breach of an le A fOr .
nee ' ,
between the parties. A verdict was returs
' ' 01,014:,,
fendant.
-4810'1f JOblitb'ti
WORSLEY V. BROW- ;„ti , fm. t
This was an action brought by the Pia"' bill, -I!se,'
ley, against the defendant, Henry flOwarece°s„lo3,oll.
covery of a sum of £219, for executing 8 iestiOveoo7 s,
net at Manchester; and, before the ela;°tiff; pf. •
nesses, a verdict was taken for the Ple'a
subject to a reference. ,
CROMPTON V. LANE' ~fereaCe'
Verdict for the plaintiff, subject to a I.' ~,010; for be'
,vrt Ariv.,ntso," or too
JOHNSON V. STANSVELD ~• cco.-,er 41 4,
This was an action brought by sa ,e 0,ers)1,01601
ranging matters of dispute between 01 walsoitiro apie
poor for the township of Todmorden 'a.. 010 red a
ratepayers of that township. A verdict, loco
the defendant, alter the jury had been
eleven o'clock. 1010/4'
~,,,so.S. the I) al;
RATCLIFFE v• WILIC.--ht by • vols•
~,
This was an action in trover, hr"g",at gr; 00,(11
William Ratcliffe, against the defende"-'bolu 'd 1°- rtiiir
to recover possession of certain hnes:ppeareAsost
chattels. Mr. Martin and Mr. 1tle" -kW' 00
plaintiff; and Mr. Martin for the deferoe, ea,
was returned for the plaintiff, darlißgfa give°
to be reduced to 40s. on the goods belf2g
The Court adjourned at seven o'cloclr•
stOt
----4.------ oy, to , •
CROWN COURT.--Trivlts.o tainti
His LORDSHIP entered the Court at
t` aor
/I gi
nine.
Thomas Simpson, Benjamin Hard
the deothecert°olll 1
' • MANSLAUGWral'‘an,and jOarCelitti4
treed the (1 toe hoissi
kFienrsgouns,on7arteLiinttdleicßteoditotonr cvistiipnigea
ion,
00000 e
o:fr
been drinking at a public-house in 13° beitig 00 `bopb A
May last, and was in liquor. ile was • ana a ar. '
oe ' do° fer II .on
by two men, and was very quarrels
decease 'eb 10
a dispute having ensued between theu ,n, ot a 0 i
soner Simpson, a fight took place, during
;receive
oillos
Pero,
he Pr alit tio' was thrown down on the ground, a" jOO. 04,
which caused his death. bie
Mr. WILKINs addressed the, Jury forats risio , ,
afterwards called a number of most resort co
of •
to their character. The jury, after 3 Jr
acquitted all the prisoners. ell,) 100;f111' ,
STABBING. , _Ref- $,,- A
John Pickton, 27, (could read and w;rbooilegoos f )05
Picklon, were charged with stabbing some
01 ,01q_011.4
Warrington, with intent to do hito_,sf,et the,;',olCA f!,:,,
harm. The facts of the case were, tuf,a, a fo!lo, r„ner,..
last, two young men were returning !Varriagt_ ?tract
been held in the neighbourhood owf
..7tbe t.vi°r jec
Orliotyr,
in with a party, amongst whom ,
_Trosecatf,,iserl_ ads
Some altercation having during heck
he rrivb"roilli, l'A,
and a row took place, ,!ph be was obbeucistlrcp ,
from a sharp instrument, by 'clad beens!sy, 1 stlitif ,1
and it was ascertained that he , 4,136 ancct o ~,j , ,
Prisoners tock a very active part o:j the obl;_it, r.
rently singled out the mopesprosecutoce_a st,"
Ar i
The jury found them guilty Of,a.
_°„riscalree irr.,e,
were sentenced to six months low
svoto., write oey;ip,
31., (co I, 'woondlosa' 0,0,,,
Benjaminfecu y
) was
indicted
ss aibi c to o s L(
WuPdtl_eact sQu,, Job; /roll
It appeared that the prosecuto.
ow_te et OPTet it; if!?
person named Raby, to a beerand u 5
, a tool used in rolefsflog
they saw the prisoner, who /a , ants ae _, iff'd
er iniPtem et to dam bO2 1
containing a saw and oth no quart other rber r boat sr./A
altercluifeo'r malicioursl!,snt, ni e
..,,bsch Pro.
Prisoner was very noisy, but o atio-agse 0 fter,,,,
prosecutor and his friend retaire
a left the ;loon soov,,titl,''',,
being with him some time, a er eallowe It the •% 00.7 f
taking the saw out of his hof
the !low
tit
several times on the head, inflicting
t parts c' lig, 0P boa ')
and several others in differen
...,, morp!,_,,t be , sf.
past ten o'clock. The p.risPansket, struee ar siitay, ite
, but 0 00 v
that he was at the beersuon, i achir lariat l
nse,,, cos 0, ,
was in self-defence. e's con ease roseeol.l`,'
Mr. WILKIss the
contendingPrisnrthat tbeby the Pej theof
jury in his behalf, anted , had as ,ofe•
ferent to what it had been renr,7ed, Linn gle so 13! ere sy
been attacK ~ be a .t J 3 t 0.1,
as the prisoner had be i e should s gee "A tha"e
to protect himself, which ' d there visOo ell' dtb •
securl sittitte
prisoner was apprehended then ex. said
isp. 3,,
called several witnesses, an
the pro OC . )
tlenCe' l'
sect ort_ip
A nor or-_„t ,
Oft. tea" lot° dra;
soner. oGO Cr
MAN SL,A uid neith e oar etete.f.
William Smalley, 50,
ikc2itor of 10,0 tp.est,, tiro I
was indicted for the Mans,!!"f„„earedt ['pig roe 70,4
ley, at Heaton Norris. It_ 71;', 23d no.,as svt,':rearl „ f,lor ,t,
that, n
defence. between the
T ha evidence
jury inforcon
of Mr. Whigham, anilgtbet"oa to°' °li
...se oat ,terce-i laetit
°••• •buttl • eln
deceased, were at a Pub there, so 101
Heaton Norris. While
~,,ed
between prisoner and ti,,'s
sorter, with some other perbsonsr

00"

113 - '
the
01;
t 60
iLtelsi I
wAlt
og
wo"