The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1843-11-07 00:00:00

UNIVERSITY AND CLERICAL NEWS.

OXFORD, Nov. 2
In a convocation holden this day permission was given
to Mr. Charles Henry Barrett, M.A., and Fellow of
Magdalen College, to commute the degree of Master of
Arts for that of Bachelor of Civil Law.
In the same convocation George Lidwill Shannon,
M.A., of Trinity College, Dublin, was admitted ad can-
dem.

In a congregation holden at the same time the follow-
ing degrees were conferred :
Bachelor in Divinity.—The Rev. John Rouse Bloxam,
Fellow of Magdalen College.
Masters of Arts.—The Rev. John Thomas Spring,
Edmund-hall ; the Rev. Thomas Jackson, Queen's ; the
Rev. Lloyd Sanders, Christ Church; the Rev. 'William
Edward Allfree, Wadham ; The Rev. Edward James G.
Hasluck, Pembroke; Arthur Bigge, University; John
Barber, Worcester.

Bachelors of Arts.—The Rev. Henry Fyffe, New Inn-
; Samuel Harward Archer, Exeter College ; John
O'Brien, Queen's (incorporated from Trinity College,
Dublin).

CAMBRIDGE, Nov. 3 .
At a Congregation on Wednesday last the following
Degrees were conferred :

DOCTOR IN DIVINITY.—Jacob Henry Brooke Moun-
tain, Trinity.

MASTERS OF ARTS.—Charles Griffith Smith, Clare
Hall ; Fred. Edward Long, King's ; Samuel Longhurst,
Queen's ' • Joseph Spence, Christs ; Alfred Hudson Shad-
well, St. John's; Charles John Bayley, Trinity.
BACHELOR IN MEDICINE.—Henry William Fuller,
Carus.

BACHELOR OF ARTS.—J. G:wen, Trinity Hall,

PROMOTIONS

LAW INTELLIGENCE

COURT OF CHANCERY.-SATURDAY

WALSH 71, GLADSTONE.—JUDGMENT•
The Lord Chancellor gave judgment in this case, if,Dld
related to a codicil in the will of the late Mr. Blunflemo
Liverpool.. His lordship said it appeared in evltebi;
that in the year 1823 the late Mr. Blundell gave onlHr•
butler,. a person named Hall, two sealed packets' ---sr
which was addressed to him lallSand the other to
Blundell's housekeeper, named Mary Ann Harrl'o)
dire.ctions that he should take them to his (Mr. Bluilde.,,
banaers, and that they were not to be opened until l!:
his death. The packets were deposited according
directions, and after the death of Mr. Blundell theY °to
opened and one of them was found to contain a check'd,
£5OO in favour of his butler (Hall,) and the other sliest,
for £3OO, in favour of Harris (the housekeeper). Suitt.
quently to depositinc, these packets at the bankers,
an,
Blundell, in 1824, made a will, by which be gave 0,.„0 ner
nutty of £2OO per year to his butler (Hall,) and inkri,
year to his housekeeper (Harris) ; when the will,„loara
Blundell was proved, these checks' of £5OO and Xavy pier
admitted to probate, and as the will revoked all falit
testementary papers, and gave the residue of the t.eatalta
property to the legatees therei❑ named, the question
.8074
as to winther the parties whose names were met will
in the checks were entitled to them, or whether t"' ern,
of 1824, giving annuities, •
annuities did not makc them the PlePtiesr
of the reeiduary legatee.' His lordship said it was,l; the
that the. checks had been admitted to probate vtlPf the
last will of the testator, and therefore formed Part ~°rty
will ; consequently they' must be considered the
d
of the residuary legatee. With respect to costs, be 5 p
order that they be paid out of the estate of the testate
to 070

VICE CHANCELLORS' COURT.—SovioNa'

Allen, Rev. Henry, Vicar of St. Mary-le-Wigford,
Lincoln, to the Vicarage of Patcham, Sussex ; patron, the
J— unGESEIf
Lord Chancellor. CORPORATION OF GLOUCESTER V. WOOD. n
IbiS Cat
Angley, Rev. J. G., 8.A., of Trinity College, Dublin, Vice Chancellor Wigram gave judgenientGlioucesteri,
to the Curaly of St. George, Barnsley, Yorkshire. which was a bill filed by the corporation of 9 Woo
Burgess, Rev. Robert, B.A. of Christ's College, recover from the executors of the late Mr. James .leggy"
Cambridge, to the Curacy of Sandiacre, Derbyshire.
Harrison, Rev. Henry, M.A., of Trinity College,
Cambridge, and Incumbent of Christ Church, Kilndown, in gto £200,000, which was bequeathed to toe ;„ Oft
to be Domestic Chaplain to Lord Viscount Beresford. tion b codicils •n will made by the
ties,tlle one wealthy
for banker6o,o (11, tahnadt
thecit ,theyoth er
foram oxu4notAt t
e: i o
poi:uot
Kidd, Rev. Richard Bentley Porson, M.A., formerly 1825. yThat will also declared that all prtoepsteartfYrbe".ktonlitig
of Emmanuel College, Cambridge, to the Vicarage of to him at the time of his decease should belongthe case
Potter Heigham, Norfolk ; patron, the Bishop of Nor- executors, unless specially disposed of. When gecate°
wich. for the e' taint! was heard, it was contended hy counsel nor , Tate, Rev. Thomas, ALA., of Trinity College, Cant- that the legacy to the corporation was void, fort' inteLl
bridge, Curate of Edmonton, Middles..-,x, to that Vicarage, as to the nature of the bequest, and as to the real,ch the
vacant by the death of the Rev. J. Tate ; patrons, the' tions of the testator •, that was the question Iv" kedee
Dean and Chapter of St. Paul's.
Williams, Rev. Lewis, Curate of Monton, Monmouth- the wording of the will and codicils,
shire, to the Rectory of Matherne, near Chepstow, vacant observations, by saying it was his clear opinion receier
by the death of the Rev. J. Probyn ; patron, the Bishop must dismiss the bill filed by
of Llandaff. Court had now to decide. His HonouarntlieleinrnecTuartdheadt II::
the legacy of £200,000.
Williams, Rev. Thomas. Rector of Llanvapley, Mon- Bill dismissed without costs.
mouthshire, to the Arcdeaconry of Llandaff.
Yorke, Rev. Philip Wynne, to the Rectory of Hawkes-
well, Essex, vacant by the death of the Rev. C. Walling-
ton ; patron, R. Bristow, Esq.

The Bishop of Chester has arrived at his palace at
Chester, and intends to reside there until the close of
February.

His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury, President of
the National Society, has appointed the Rev. W. J. Ken-
nedy, M.A., of St. John's College, Cambridge, and curate
of Kensington, to be secretary of the National Society.
We are happy to announce the safe arrival in this
island, on the Bth inst., of the Right Rev. the Bishop of
Gibraltar, and suite, by Her Majesty's steamer Virago,
from Gibraltar.—Malta Times.
DIVISIONS.—A letter in the Record, signed, " A Mas-
ter of Arts," mentions that Mr. Palmer, Dr. Hook, Mr.
Gresley, Mr. Perceval, Archdeacon Manning, Mr. Paget,
have relinquished their connection with Dr. Pusey and
Mr. Newman, although it is still doubtful how far they
have abandoned the peculiar views of these Anglo-
Romanists.
In the Arches Court, on Thursday, a motion was made
that the Rev. H. E. Head, rector of Feniton, Devon,
(who had been sentenced to suspension for three years,
and condemned in the costs. for publishing matter in de-
rogation of the Book of Common Prayer,) might be re-
lieved from the costs attending the protest in the first
instance, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, to
which tribunal the case on protest was appealed, not
having condemned Mr. Head in the costs of that appeal—
. Sir H. Jenner Fust said he had condemned the party in
the costs generally, which necessarily included the costs
of the whole proceedings, and he rejected the motion.
THE NEW BISHOP.—It is confidently stated that Arch-
deacon Lonsdale has received an intimation of his selection
for the vacant see of Lichfield. The appointment may be
considered an average one. The Archdeacon is one of the
old High Church school ; but declares his decided hostility
to Tractarianism. He vacates, on his elevation, several
important offices. He is Preacher at Lincoln's-inn. His
successor there will be nominated by the Benchers, and
we should not be surprised if a Tractarian were to be
brought forward as a candidate. His Archdeaconry is in
the gift, we apprehend, of the Bishop of London. The
Headship of King's College is in the hands of the Arch-
bishop of Canterbury ; and the valuable Prebendal Stall
in St. Paul's Cathedral will fall into the treasury of the
Ecclesiastical Commissioners. So that the government
will derive no patronage whatever from the Archdeacon's
elevation.

COURT OF EXCrIEQUER.-SAToo,"

~, ,if Stllr., ~
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. SIR J• -- ii,
rottoP
Mr. KELLY moved in this case, which was an in'°- Ant.°
for money had and received for the use of the Cr.° , co,
enter a verdict for the defendant under the followino who
cumstances :—ln 1841 one Armitage, a mial:tiseor'totbe,
owed large sums to the Crown for duties, anu - 01, I°:
defendant a highly respectable merchant at LiverPof mall
advances, consigned to the latter a large quantitY effeete,i`
to be sold on his account. Before the sale cr,.B Dolt in
the Crown came down for the duties, and t"' onderx7
took place between the defendant and A norresPfscero r?` question was seized by the sheriff.the A
rie° fell-ant.:
the Excise, relative to the allowance of the - mentst,
pay himself, and hand over the an arrange ue nolit
claim for his advances, and ultimately
entered into by which the defendant was to sell t",-,eise•
balance
.4. r as the le
This arrangement was carried into effect, a 6 'a before%
isfaction of the defendant's lien was concerned, so r'"'
Crown-officers learned they were entitled by lart,'to Pre'
cently laid down in a case of " R. v. Truetna"fottbw"bi
payment, and they revoked their former Conseill frog' ttba
del' ta;rt' ted t°
~K"'
The defendant, however, refused to
arrangement, and this proceeding was ins'',-ut Org-;:t-
-wi
Joshuath a fNu‘lrlaki
un e
sie y
the question. It was now submitted, that tufa pile-
rn de
ment amounted to, and was in fact, a volunttica, -6„,
on the part of the Crown of the defendant's c: noran-'
defendants. ,g'" if, 0'
knowledge of the facts, though E 0 tiO C sir
no doubt, of the haw; and, that being' s Uric ill°
petent to, the Attorney-General to pro% proceed
a
Rule granted. - Ad.
for this
amount.
o.%at,

„pntiOnr,7,4s 01
MIDDLE TEMPLE, Nov. 3. The undertm--beao- the
tlemen took the customary oaths before thenved tO, of
this hon. society, and were thereupon duly e”, Bur ;''s,
degree of barrister-at-law :—James St. Ge°rlg)eef'''ol;
Gower-street, London ; Henry Mills, of the -0 n- prist-d,
\Vest Indies ; Vincent Stuckey- Logan, of Cli,f,Ta''s°,lo,oe-
John William Martin Fonblanque f St; c"Ood, ",dre•
Middlesex ; William Partridge, of 1.3' ishoP s'"C-heaPs.o;
fordshire ; David Morris of King- I°,,ca
Davyd William Nash, of, Wotton-Unsder-rA4-'
tershire ; and Thomas Chaloner Smith, of
Wilts.
m cliAlg"jr in
MR. MONCIe MASON AND THE FLYING —„j'Ffi.,-;:orir
A case of considerable interest came 011,,,;9:01,-.P5-the
the Palace Court, Westminster, when Mr.
the aeronaut, brought an act'on against Mr' i'sPiiiving
Proprietor of the Civil Engineer and Archilec 00'$ ,ge•
for payment of three long articles about Hens nerP
Ilea 'WO
machine. Mr. Lawton agreed to pay one gni i weir
This offer was refused, and the case was breuri3 gu„-stoci
Palace Court, the defendant having paid fp the c:
Witnesses were called by the plaint ff to Pro—the 3"):'
in such cases, and the jury gave a verdict for•
claimed,
case ries:
THE LEGAL PROFESSION. The follocring.,,eot b3rosd
intcree:
ienant:ns_l
tyy:rb,o.e.:einstaionlsemyu besgnaueapirgeit
tterleineodntrs,teo::hlol\aulivlrreat.:l:bV:el
beensh , thed ri tit:et
sd 8 etsbt;
signed the roll of one only of the superiors ol:i is 01,00 f
courts, and hitherto have brought actions ibt t° A
fact of their being admitted, Or no.eitnt,h ioanudtan'lli et
ttfbdeeretrir:Peuritrcht;iniet;el
question arises, whether the rec nt act rent efo'r td33o,
for them to practise, or for the agents to ciien"-oe
agents, in any courts, the rolls of which the r
eF °Olt"'
tnioiet psruepveiroiuoselycosiugritiesdn.ligHhterpertaoefotirsee ainn attht:to°,,r.hileer
ocoginivoeos
through the medium of his London agent; Ncel'lltanee
of counsel is desired upon the point." A!ribe E0.11,:;o0j
a long opinion in reply, but the following l,,,tute
of it. "It seems to me that the present the 'cr-f the
no prohibition, disqualification, or penaltY'ne ofilY;i) stilt
an attorney admitted and enrolled in any °-ctisinkaso°'
suerior courts of law at Westminster, Pr,gch be 1' iorY
other. of the said courts (the roll of wig e of his
signed) through the medium and in the riat°aooe 95
don agent, and that therefore this maY be
tofore "

REV. MR. SIRTHORP.—The Rev. G. S. Faber, of Dur-
ham, has just published a very interesting letter on the
subject of Mr. Sibthorp's recent conversion to Roman-
ism and subsequent departure from her communion, in
which be says—" Relying on the fidelity of representa-
tions such as that of Dr. Wiseman, and thence believing
the charge of idolatry to be without foundation, Mr.
Sibthorp is induced to quit the pure communion of the
protestant church of England for the supposed still purer
communion of the popish church of Rome. Thus, by
the actual practice of the party which he joins, he has a
full opportunity of testing the correctness of the explana-
tion afforded by that ingenious gentleman, Dr. Wiseman.
And what is the result? Why it is nothing less than a
conscientious departure from the very society into which
he had entered through a full belief that Rome was un-
justly charged by England with idolatry; a departure,
moreover, be it specially observed, on the avowed ground,
as I have been led to understand, that he was required to
pay a species of adoration to the Virgin Mary, which,
after all the arnbages of Dr. Il'iserndf, plain unsophis-
ticated common sense told him was palpable idolatry or
creature-worship. In other words, as soon as the veri-
table practice of the Latin church was exhibited to him in
its undisguised deformity, all Dr. Wiseman's painful ex-
planations, and all other essays to boot of the same
stamp and tendency, vanished into thin air. Mr. Sib-
thorp, after Quitting England for Rome in the full honest
belief that Rome is not idolatrous, finds it necessary to
return from Rome to England on the equally honest
practical conviction that Rome is idolatrous."

TOTAL EMIGRATION FROM TO

_rgdor°
T 1 ted 1%1 newer
beofornetahtet,agienteiedr,anloemleisgsrtahtiaonnlf2rsor3nuthreper; :et:o:e e: if:
showing
grated
el aidnv
gei tont h
etrhenepuomer
otb,uetrrhsseawt
oli
lifoi
that
t 2
year.it
, r e a c 13:\ d
each
s 01,00;lt gbeet up rrOe,s
ferent colonies. During mot ego,
_ticv
deCr
0' roe oe
sent year, the emigration has greatly
38,226 having left the United Kingdom• ,A;nnctill.„,r4hjich
statement is also appended .°r3"-- f °'fiP'.
of the eon, . eiy, r 66, id
first six months of 1842 and 1843 respective 0 is 0o
it will be seen that the decrease on the balf-Yvvbicb 001'
It would be difficult to assign any eaoxse .1001, Se;
received : and in the case
adequately account f • fII (1 0" ; 'tig I ret.'
tiolpefrotfihcreesetdAsel liar:
eolf:0,1;,"ie
colaiiiioY.
for so great a a In, istl Aeter e
seem partly ascribable to the depression es, - ' Di b
veral of the colonies, and which has doubt'teslbotles, to
many from emigrating until better acceo° 010,100'
the want of any public funds applicablebiest.:4“,2lbuvritibo;
buil,
' the
the voyage being too expensive to be defrOlog, or
;1(!!!!!541151:13 2 4"
C:411.
r 6
: e genv ioe-a
,007 were provided with passages out of the por,,, ,
s
of State for the :tome Department. funds of the colonies • 230 wre nominate:l': c° sec(
ai under f
directionsdeposite
rt:11; the
Pt—out dile);
en sew OA,
In the present year 31persons have be -;,(1 1' ',e e'",t
funds deposited for the chase of lands' ", 15,1°0 ill"
directions from the IlompeurSecretarv• -B:netioYne;;JneStrbleY
gration on bounty, as have already 0:- les; before
about to be commenced to New South N'781.101 o'
3,000 people are expected to be despote

KINGDOM

WN COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS

8 .
1018„13,eCial meeting of the Town Council was held at the
to 4,74411. on Toelday, for the purpose of taking into
L. ration and determining upon the special proceed-
, 41kof the Dock. Committee, on the subject of further
tf kicteotamodation north and south of the present line
148 comprising a
toersolution passed by that body on
,j , • eject of a notice parliament.
0, lq' PARKER rose and said, he wished to be informed
i 6 111 rilt)wn-clerk whether gentlemen holding shares in
i ile uarrington Dock Company could take any part in
r' karesent discussion, or record their votes on the sub-
li ' it;
') tto el'"rw-cLEthe question must necessarily
la_ TOWN-CLERK said, %sl siouefore the council that day, as to whether the coon-
° 14,1 ',ld give a notice for a bill in parliament to enable
0 heitaitx trustees to purchase the Harrington estate. This
r tto,,,°.!olust arise, if no other question should; and he
'ltrrlitt prepared to reply to Mr. Parker, if the council
itred it advisable.
~It;bI'AJIKEIt again pressed for an answer.
' tot ' uakstnEy-MoonE considered Mr. Parker's ques-
; thlvery proper one ; because, if there were any gen-
' ts4l7,Present who were interested in the Harrington
Wisis'it would b desirable to know heth
l'illbiiustifiede in remaining in thew roomer or not they
%Id "/i-ccuax asked, whether his opinion was re-
,ks ; that particular stage of the proceedings?
1,40,1.4• TH begged to interpose. He could not con-
nosi cue Town-clerk giving any opinion ; and, without
kill ng the basis of what the Town-clerk's opinion might
4 hleiwonld for himself state the determination to which
N,sconle upon the subject. It was this—that he
Itbstegrn, either directly or indirectly, take part in the
i , or vote on the question of the purchase of the
litt, Niton estate. He had a direct interest in that es-
tkeb As a number of the council he was anxious that
it etchase should be made, and thought that it was the
141 tad interest of the Dock Committee to make it;
111184toetriber of the Harrington Dock Company, he
gi -141110 t the sale, and thought that other and better
tl4,p'ght be ado tr]. -
IliisL-sPtvlsz-cLEttpx slid, the municipal act laid it down
lirrY, that no member should vote upon any matter
keinillite should be himself a partner,uourt_linavgewnnaytepvee;
t iieltille
council
Aw th thereipurhesreett,e:i t
utiva%-eas l9l . h
Harrington estate ;
kil/2ti ell"? very well, that upon the proceedings of the
'Ns 43Mittee beinc, read, a very important question
ttietise, which would have reference to the Harring-
Suck estate. He apprehended that he would not be
LtikOder the circumstances, by giving an opinion on
,!titinon which he supposed would arise. The first
:11),-,„4,11ould be, whether a part owner of the Harring-
ate.o'it estate, being a member of the council, could
Itherit4,,,ke an art i any discussion relating to a notice
its;:‘entiori Pof the trustees to go to parliament for
:144.(4'..,Purchase the Harrington estate. Now, he
`l4s-uedlY of ' ion, that no such member could vote
Li%
thitar! in. `any such discussion. He was also of opi-
-0 Do L.' °it the question of warehouses on the Harring-
Ns ek
gestate,members ought to be governed by the
6i, rale
Lsetebapplied to the first question, namely, that
,01, er of the Harrington Dock esta,.e ought to take
kite vote in any such discussions. (Hear, hear.)
)10411010e further discussion, it was decided that the
:llt% should be read.
10 '''tfteedin,gs of the Dock Committee having been
tit
P. -A.Nus moved the following resolution :—" That
Littotdient that a special meeting of the council should
ttikT, for an early day after the 9th of November next,
~...141:.1to consideration the subject of going to podia-
CV ,ower to purchase land, &c., to the north and
doh or either) of the present line of docks, for
ktlillothe°4.lcckaa.ccommodationf; andthaelsorufouruspeodwuerewto makenorth
4 lkihTst watrd? by
waterte eergsmand Liverpool Canal, and
11Net:lase landYn'ecessary for that purpose ; and that, in
IdivetZitae, the Dock Committee should be at liberty
sk requisite parliamentary notices, all proceedings
117(te.'ing subject to the determination of the trus-
-3)OClPoncil),jat the special meeting to be called after
.0h le.`ovember next."
IN rhlo,on seconded the motion.
1 tittiCt'°os of the Shipowners' Association, in favour
tit°t'osed purchases by the Dock Committee, were
silteti to the council by the Mayor. Tile same r.eso-
%Ns:vete read in the proceedings of the Dock Corn-
titZ4
eta; I,l„,t)obsosr said he would propose a previous TO-
t)4. kkiZeh he hoped the council would see the propriety
11.0„tN2old readily assent to it. He wished to separate
eOttlqestions. He wished to have a general expres-
s'ed ,rtlion on the subject of warehouses, and he pro-
Altiet,"ll Principle. He wished to move, as aprevfirouums
it:itig ewthat the Dock Committee be precluded
tetteltosleite,e or taking any steps as
The
the building of
kotektite .8 by the said committee. Dock Cominit-
u ki, t° a resolution that they would not allow ware-
,Ne• '.° enter into the question, not on principle but on
41e sil"; He (Mr. Hodgson) proceeded on
.principle
Vet, 111Xe,'Ple that it was wrong to ask to build ware-
Cliss'lta the public money. He was asked where was
ZNY, that4lF. going for the notices. He answered, gene-
-s:l4it was absurd to give notice for that which
L ttild tbe made use of. Mr. Hodgson proceeded to
Isistlistalt,t some length, that to bring warehouses,
.built
it4s,e;",c trust and with public
.money, into competition
Ori„,_enouses belonging to viduals, was an invasion
kitshs" i ht • a d concluded by moving the amend-
er -irersget a'
forth.n
NtdiTrttillirmoved the following amendment to dis-
-11:1tM1 4.1 t?f Mr. Hodgson:—" That in the Irenttuofistshuies
Licesr'og authority to the Dock Committee t
mu, or the application to parliament for power
.o ex-
-I.le Present dock accommodation, it is the opinion of
111,,N1:inucuil,tbat they shall include in the said notices the
ttdocks.,',o erect warehouses round all or any of the
ItittaretF4.ez said this motion could not be received with-
k,,itted tAttens,Y became the mover of the resolution sub-
Neo„,Y Mr. Hornby, which stood as an amendment,
he'Ld be discussed without notice.
ii tentlemen present connected with the Harrington
sonleti Estate, were Messrs. North, Horuby, Stewart.,
iiki' Bushell (as a trustee,) Kilshaw, Lace, and Sir
he trancic'er.
:it j Tv°od, Mr. Kilshaw, and Mr. Lace severally declared
;I.os rltentions not to vote or take any part in the discus-
It: though it was understood that they might be pre-
& r„
4'ttip'vklvs said it had been stated that they would, in
It the warehouses on new docks, be violating a compact
ae'g Warehouse owners. It was, however, the exist-
l'4,ll,,ta that were alone alluded to, and the word " ex-
bttcetsitih
.:thae been irierted for the express purpose of pre-
aPplication to new docks, for the eurseof
et „,.1c the future. Mr. Evans, after speaking of the
ZNeleterence of the north over the south for docks,
teeTiat the subject should lie over, and that a cottni
lli,tht b: aPPointed to inquire into the case,
dcatmhae toi
Villolenlet on its general merits.
.When they
6. oth question he would show that in fire insurances
f
1 ‘llO%. Amer matters Liverpool was sustaining a loss of
1444.-ukper annum under. the present system.
uhf that VNALL said it was. not with respect to mono-
h.sci 1; he should vote against warehouses ; it was on
liLtlitt'' The greatest monopoly would be the patron-
-01)s, 11,-ssch warehouses would give to any p.arty w.ho
li4a, so -ato be in power. There was another thing which 1
4,, ti.e..t 'wrong. He believed that no less than £170,000 I
)1'4444 already expended in the half warehouses, as they
),ettitscillt called, on the Albert Dock. If this were so, he
tliZto 13° IftloW where it would end. If the warehouses
lie • be uuilt by private capital he would not object to
ttotetnaltal!e Would not part with the public money to
*44'1.014-W1
.buildings thlt would not pay, and which
toitte. Ike sett Injuriously with private. warehouses. He
,Itls"'ethe pr`ll,ow, from the Chairman of the Dock corn-
Mar; "41.ro°uable cost of the warehouses. in question.
Ntse hihseaaid it would be about nine guineas per
16 veeri ins but great portion of the expense would
Pietll,ern 11.24redainmaking the foundation of the dock 1
df,,lu•oo6,74oehouses had heen built or not. The sum
N. .4,,. Luerefore was
toilnt for warehouses only.
)01.* 1N41.1...—8ut the public money that is
124 t. tv sz
ri4r. AssA 8.----Yes ; for the public benefit.
i Oste,,,IIIALL,—It can't be for the public benefit to
tiliti.this',,l"' Public money against private property. It
ittgoaser"rl9iPle that I stand up against the building of
1.,, NI with the public money.
Nili, Ivas„el.?1• contended that it would be inexpedient to
It, the h-"uses on the docks in question. Ile thought,
klett bro Per time arrived for warehouses to be erected,
N.G. " the quays of the central docks.
Itu hill• LAWRENCE said he would vote for the
,tee* The shipowners advised that they should
Zik.is trierY Yard of land to the south up as far as
,Y4''' 1 ot.'"e• He th ht it would be wise to do so.
ttieetl-ctoink they would be acting either with wisdom
Itlt:°ase; titleY were to say in a decided manner that
it - should not be built on the quays of the new
VM h
5,41 th°,,,--GsoN said they had no objection to the erec-
itsee'rtarehouses. Their objection was merely to
iq to 41 which it was proposed to build them. They
\444N. have them built so that they would not injure
tt, 11 oPerty.
118.41.4418.1.. t R said the proposal was directly against
kna,..o,Vodgson had just advocated, for it was to take.
Nbliel fro
in private holders and incorporate it with
tks,ipu `rust No such compact as that which had
~ Ateeetl of had been entered into. He was one of the
'l4, ;0048411,d the word. existing. was inserted to prevent
tltil4 the from coming within the clause. He should
li.k amendment.l.,L4tlset said there was an implied contract that no
vett should b built till the Albert Warehouses
4r. 'tied. Heewasu in favour of warehouses deci-
oklititti.k
11/4Vthe-stl"r contended that the proposal was directly
41. s Puke it of the compact. They might as well ex-
-11:14 ,soiTticmonev in the purchase of ships for the
ti 4
optlitit
„tete
sPing freightlow.
believedit was understood that
41(isilt:ettsw,reanidothtoe ti the Albert warehouses
,iO3, ti-tet,t, and he believed no gentleman wouldillivawve.
qbeii.e_roPt to violate that compact.. Now,
ki
ky Whiveted the movement was with the warehouse
h int thU Was forcing this matter forthe purpose of
rap tor, •„e erection of warehouses on the quays of the
IN Alt Docks.
Visilllt(cN said it was true that they had no intention
"1. ty o_Parliament, and he was now prepared to show
• tithowlght not to go to parliament at all. According
It tilt) t011,,g o,f the parties opposed to him,. they ought
klis,,"ed Parliament now, for the experiment had not
We r'',, hi ti..to allusion to a return made for the purpose.
Tide,
tll'ie Want of dock accommodation, Mr. Allan
Igil:, 44 last four years we have not had any increase
'lto he showed that since 1840 there had been a
tik, e falling off in the tonnage entering the part.
ti°t such urgent necesE,itv t ~