The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1843-04-07 00:00:00

stated. Mr. Martin and
plitintiffs ; Mr. Duntins ;lii

The trial of this t

actions), occupied 11
shortly after ten o'c
and of no interest e

The plaintiffs, Thomas I
and Richard Stout, arc calico ant
place near Clithero ; end th:! tlfTt
in London, who, at the period cf tl
also carried o❑ business in the s;
The plaintiff Mr. Stout attended to
in Manchester, and his partners m
Clithero. The defendant agreed
number of mousseline des laincB to
tiffs' works, according to certain
cially provided for hint, upon term
of much investigation, the chid• of
ments should be made monthly.
printed, the last parcel which wa
The plaintiffs, not receiving p:iylni
ditions, detained the last pnex,:i.
action to recover the amount dou:
Is. 6d. The defendant paid :EOO it
liability to pay the remainder, on t
damaged in printing, and retuned
order of court) at a period when
market.

The case closed at a quarter to five o'c
retired to consider their verdict. After 1..)
they returned into court with a verdict f
wages £l5B Is. 6d. ; the blocks and pa'
defendant.

TROVEI

FAWCETT v. FIELDING AND OTIIF.I
action referred to above. The declar
recover from the defendants compel
tamed from the plaintiff the 170 pie

After the statement of the case
DUNDAS, and the examination of ti

Mr. DUNDAS said he was wiling to
to say what sum his client was entit
abide by his Lordships decision, with()
going through the facts.
Mr. MARTIN assented on the part o
The JUDGE thought £lO would be
addition to £9 which had been paid inl
A verdict was then entered for the p

itiff for

SWAINSON v. SWAINSON AND _
a verdict was taken by consent for a
subject to a reference.

The Court adjourned a few minut

o'clock

--_-_...0....___-

THE CAUSE LI
The Cause List, when the Court to
as follows :

FIRST LIST.-SALFORD
Plaintif.—Nos. I, 2,3, 4,5,
18, 20, 22, 23, 24. 25, 27, 30, 31
Defendant.—Nos. 8, 12, IC
Referred.—Nos. 28, 29, 4:
Withdrawn.—Nos. 19, 3
Struck Out.—Nos. 45,

SECOND LIST.—WEST DEIU
P lainbff. —Nos. 1,3, 4,7, 8, 12, 1;
34, 39, 46, 55.64, 65, 68.
Withdrawit —Nos. 2,5, 6, 9. 11, 1
23, 24, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 37, 41, 42,
85. 86, 88.
Referred.—Nos. 44, 49.
In the first list, the only causes rem;
special juries, " Farrar v. Deflinne," an(
The former will be tried this morning
ted to' occupy the whole day; the
Tuesday next. In the other list th
and 38 common cases to be ding.
mences to-morrow week (l
Judges must be in town ; in the
of occupation here.

Saturday

CHESTER

CROWN COURT--
(Before Mr. Justice 1

3fichael Mahar, aged 36, John Br
35, and John Hopkins, 23, were a
house of Peter Woods, at Capanhurs
moneys to the amount of £lo._

[We reported this case very fully vin
brought before the magistrates at 13iracc
The jury found Michael Mahar and
acquitted the rest.
The two were sentenced to fifteen ye
On the application of the Attorney.t
ordered Superintendent Boughev, an(
Birkenhead police, to be rewarded for I
exercised in the apprehension of the pri

CIVIL SII

(Before Mr. BARON MJ
The Learned Judges this morning exc
to Mr. Justice Williams being connec
parties in a case tried. The whole p.
were of a very uninteresting character 1.

NISI PRIUS COURT.—WF
Before Mr. Justice WILL'

LOVELL V. BOYD AND OTHERS
case Messrs. Jarvis and Welsby

Mr. Evans and Mr. Temple for th

was brought to recover the value of 370 ti
wheat which had been sold to the plainti
chant, residing at Bilston, in Stafforclsh
dants who are corn merchants in Liv,
was sold by a person named Pratt, and o
sent to the order of the plaintiff by the c
order it was shipped at Liverpool and trai
Brook, in this county, where it was lodgt
of the Duke of Bridgewater, baying bee
one of the Duke's lighters. At this piaci
the defendants in consequence of some
Pratt, and refused to be delivered up to
commenced his action for the recovery of
tees of the Duke of Bridgewater, but that
on a judge's order, and directed w be cam!
present defendants. The defence to the a,
goods were stopped whilst in course of t,
countermand had been given to the order
peared, however, that the trustees of the
water were in the habit of acting as. ware.
such received the goods in question int?
hold to the order of the plaintiff. On 'ld"'
ruled that at the time the goods reache t
transit was at an end, that there bad heel
and directed the jury to find a ve dict
r for t
however the defendants liberty to move to
the court above should be of o
Accordingly a verdict was enter
wages £768 pinion tha

AN ELECTION 131,L

PARRY V. MAINWARING. k• d
brought by Mr. W m. Parry, the landlor
Arms Inn, Holt, in the county of Denbigl
amount of a bill from the defendant, who
the Denbighshire Bghs, for expenyes in,
last general election.ur The whole - ,nt
covered was £122 9s. 2d., part of '"10, t
P aid ; but the balance due—narnelle,
first that he never promised to rod ; ne
had were in less quantities than
v art
therefore, under the tippling act, N! c
tied to recover ; and, thirdly, that
voters during an election for thel-i•
Mr. Jervis and Mr. Welsby we t
V. Williams for the defendant.
The trial of the cause occupies
the day, and the reading over sevt
of particulars created no little atrAti,:,
instance, there was a ball at which
sent, at which was supplied nine)
glasses of brandy and water, an g
were paid to a fiddler and harper 4:1ri;;
company.
Mr. V. 'WILLIAMS contendeti
orders given to supply the liquor It4;.ic
defendant had already paid. Mc
leaving the court, found a verd:c.l
£52 9s. 3d., the amount sought to ht
The cases tried in the Crown Citt
Maule, were of so trivial a naturt, tat
notice

The cases tried in the cou
great public interest.

THE ":DARNLEY JEWEL.
the workmanship of the 16th century
the finest gems of the collection of
which was purchased at the sale thet
Ferrer, of Wardour-street, for a large
tive competition amongst the bidder
by her Majesty, at the price, it is. s,
was about to be sold to a foreign co'
sion of the celebrated iron ring of
Mary Queen of Scots, when tilL
rescued it; and it is now amongst th,
land, as formerly it was amongst ti,
land. It is the identical jewel worn b
was made by order of Lady Mar'aret --
in memory of her husband, Matthew :Stu
and Regent of Scotland, who was
nrder,
opposed him in religion. The jewel,
workmanship, is of fine gold, hi th
two inches long, and nearly two inches
: °it
r
surface, which opens in front, there is a
are three small rubies and an emerald. a
there is a sapphire in the shape of
ruby, emerald, and sapphire. The co'ron
ui
Victory and Patience. There are also t
jewel, representing Faith and Hope. The
figures, which are very elaborate, are oft(
enamelling. There is the following legc
" Sal obtein Victorie yair-Preten
Quha hopis stil constantly with Pat
The coronet and little heart may be hot
below; within the coronet are three I
" M. L. S." with a crown of laurel over t
verse of the coronet within are two hearts j
by two arrows, bound by a wreath with a
we Resolve." When he
t little heart is o
two bones are seen, and two
the rest ha
the
n hr
which hangs a horn with of
dessolve." On the other side of heave
moon and stars are also represented.
on a heliotropiurn, or sunflou-er,
der in the flames, a pelican feeding
emblematical,
a shepherd, a traveller, a dog, and a b
" My stait to them I may c
For you quha is of I3ontes
with a legend—
When the whole heart is opened, on the
men in Roman armour fighting. .An exc
woman by the hair with a cattle axe, as a
her; two frightful jaws, out of which issu
flames. The figure of Time is seen draw
with a fire in many cros.ses are
supposed to be Truth, from a well; and
three legends, which seem al rot I)l,e'
leir," and " Gar tell my Retaes•
worked. and is one of the most ex
art of the age.

per youi

se it to the judge
to. and lie would

action it

Wort-
lage of

OBEREND V. WATKINSO
which Mr. Wilkins appeared fo
ley for the defendant, the pail is
Mobberlev, near Knutsford. WI
dering their verdict in Fielding V.
Mr.WORTLEY requested the cc
till Saturday. His learned friend, Mr. Wilkins, was for the
plaintiff, and he was engaged in a case of iuei
court, which he (Mr. Wortley) understood
unto to-morrow (Friday). In the meantime
ley's) client's solicitor:Mr. Rose(); who we
roners for Cheshire, was required to-morrow
an inquest at Northwich [uoen a ft male
been killed by her husband] ; so that it 'sou
ence to all parties if his Lordship would al
stand over till Saturday.
The JUDGE said that, under the circumsta
objection

We co-
to hold

e case to

Fie plaintiff for £15,000,