The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1844-10-29 00:00:00

MONEY

r 11 E RPlTertli sums of £6OOO, £4OOO. £l5OO. £1220. and
£lOOO, are 110,' READY to be. ADVANCED en
approved Land or Buildilg Security.—Apply to Mus•i•rs.
CHOIRLTON and Boonntovn, Sot oilers, 41, V!ctiria-
pkee, Birkenhead ; or at their Offices, Vera :a-street,
S!oekpc,rt, and High-street, Rallmrn.
TARVIN HALL SCHOOL,
NI AR CHESTER,

-FOR THE EDUC:VrION OF RESIDENT PUPILS
L' ONLY, and=r the -finvliiitendence and tuition of
tLc following regYerit Masttrs:—

PRINCIPAL—JOHN BRI N !AEI', of Magdalen Col-
lege, Cambrihge, Ph. D., M.A. of the Univer,i'.y of
Gi-ssPn, formerly' Seeond no-ter of the Grammar
School, Brigg ; nnd Head Maser of the Oldswinford
Hovital endowed Schorl, Worce.tershire.
ASSISTANT.—CHARLES JONES, Trinity College,
Dublin.
FlltsT CLASSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL MASTER.—
E. S. CROOKE, 8.A., Pembroke College, Cambridge,
in double honours.

FRENCH. MASTER.—MONSIEUR BOIN, 8.A., ofthe
UoicrrAity Of Nris.
GERMAN, DRAWING, AND MUSIC MASTER.—HERR
QUELLIII.7RST, a N:Aive of lia,,Jvcr.

Jt3molt MAsTEn.—Alr. R. K. BROWN E.
DRILL MASTER, and Phy Groun i Sue:intendent.—
SERGEANT COX, Idte of the 40tii Regiment.

The lhove Max•er; are resident.

TEACH EU or DANCING.—Mr. EDGAR WEBSTER,
Chew( r.

'VISITING So RGEON.-Mr. GEORGE HARRISON,
Che,ter.

The objects aimed at in this Es/0611111mm! are,
1. To in,ure a thorough Scriptural and Gentlemanly
Educalou, u:nlcr Mauters of high Classical and Mathe-
mwical aitaintner,t;.

2. To provide a sound CLissical and Mathematical Edu-
cation fcr pupik preparing for the Universities end
learned Profes,iorts —and an r-dually scant' course of hu-
siness instruction, with d ti!y practice in the Modern Con-
tinent al Languages for Mercantile diolars.
3. To otaint,tin in every department the strieest Dis-
cipline, united with kindness and modera•ion, and the
at-sence ,f corporal punishment, except in extreme cases,
and tilts, to be inflicted by The Principal only.
4. lo treat Ihe NMI: as members or the family, pro-
viding them liberally with donv-stic comforts at the s4tbe
table with the Principal and Mrtsrers,,

5. To include vnder one cha-ye every expense, both in
Eduenrional and Dotne.tie deplrtrnent3. that there rn,y
no extras for Sta:i.nery, Printed Books, Washing, Medi-
cal Attendance, nor under any pretext whatever.

TERMS :
Under Twelve years of age . Forty Guineas per annum.
Above Twelve and under Sixteen years of age.. Fifty Gui-

rica,i per annum.
Above :Sixteen years of age.. Sixty Guineas per annum.
Private Pupils are allowed a Private Study and seperate
Bedroom.. One Unwired Gniceas per annum.
All payments to be made in advance, either Quarterly or
Halt-yearly.
Number of Pupils now in the School SIXTY-FIVE.
Tar vin Hall, Sept tuber, 1814.

THE DIRECTORS of the LONDON and BIR-
MINGHAM RAILWAY COMPANY feel that in
the exercise of the trust confided to them, they are not
called upon to make any lengthened comment on the
statement which has been put forth by the Grand Junc-
tion Board. They are prepared to lay open to the in-
spection of their own proprietors, or to print for their
use, if desired, erety document connected with the recent
nrgociat ion between the Shropshire Comtnii tee and them-
selves. together with the communications which have bet n
addres.ed on this subjent to the Grand Junction Board ;
but they cannot think it either revis;te or desirable that
matters having reference only to the negociations and
private interests of railway companies should be obtruded
on the pubic.
Whatever misapprehension may have existed as to the
degree in which the Shropshire Committee aegniaseed in
the transfer to the Grand Jim•:tion Board of their pending
arrangements with the London aad Birmingham Dirt.-c-
-tteirrinn,rii,,i,lci,r,,st h,e,ce%girree. e,l,
we -ti}
„Li f
ctolui
(13,111Julyd
the Shropshire
rptslii,ritrieg
Coromitte? to th- stipula on that the making of the line
was to be vested in time errand Jiinction Board. The
point hart not been tven definitely settled between the
London and B!rmingham Directers and the Shrowhire
Connui tee, and it is evident, even had the prineiole bicA
recognised by b:;th part;es, that under no circ,imsiane a
could such a conclusion have been arrived at without the
settlement of preliminary arrunremeWs by which the hest
lin of communication should he secured, and the poss,ble
making of the rilikay with inferior gradients guarded
maimt, and by which also the objects of the Shropshire
interests should be rrovided for by sulable “ipnlatious
bet,eea the contracting parties.
It is also clear that, whatever may have been, on either
side, be extent of misappreheosian, it would have been
re;eoved at the fiat interview between the solicitors on
b tilt Fitt. s, wheneve, they might meet, in accord with the
proposal coritaincil in Mr. Glen's letter of the 15th July,
to glee legal. efivet t;) the intended measures. The diffi-
culty of contu,eng upon this point was in fact ascertain ti
very sou" afier that (tat-, and ',tactic illy the Grand
Junction Directors were nitrate almost from the first of
the views of the Shropshire Committee not to resign the
making of the line. _ _ _

re.sdects the inference whieh the Grand Jnnetlon
80-,rd have drewn from the communications reported to
have pasted between ,the professi 'nal advisers on both
sides, th, London and Birmineham Directors de net think
it necessary to offer any remarks on such iii unusual erO.
cee‘eing; but they must solemnly deny on the lift of their
Chairman, themselves. and their Solicltor, end of any one
officially connected with the London arid Brmineliam
Company, the most temo.e intention or design to act
towards the Shropshire Corrn!tee in the trendier-ens
inanuer which on such grounds hae, been assumed. Ti c
Directors deck-re, t n tee contrary, that they always roe-
temp!ated tic permanent existence of the Shropshire
Committee to protect the interests of their shareholders,
to take care that the stipulations for working the line in n
manner convenient to that part of the countrv, and for its
intertret, were properly carried out, and eventually to un-
dertake any other duties which would devolve to them.
The London and Birmingham Directors conceived that
in endeavouring to secure for the Grand Junction Com-
pany important and influential connections represented
by the Shrewsbury Committee, they had taken a course
eminently calculated to promote the interests of that
Company. The endeavours of the Directors to carry out
their intentions were most fairly met by the Shropshire
Committee, and the London and Birmingham Directors
are still at a loss to understand the motives which have
induced the Grand Junction Board to adhere to their
stipulation for making the line, because, as respects any
protective object, the clauses tendered by the Shropshire
Commitee would have been amply sufficient. They
were clauses to which this Board would have at once as-
sented, as affording ample rrotection over the expenditure
of cVital, the a-tual construction of the works, and the
leaking of contract• for them.
'1 he Directors must, however, express their surprise
that the Shrewsbury Committee should on their part have
publiened an extract from a note by Mr. Glyn, (approved,
it is true, by the London and Birmingham Directors,)
addressed to Mr. Ormsby Gore, before his letter, a copy
of which is for the first time given in the Marninu Herald
of this day, could have been laid before the Boa, d. since
it is evident that the note a-as never intended as an official
answer to Mr. Gore's official communication, and referred•
only to one point, namely, the existence of the Shrews-
bury Company as an independent undertaking, which had
been alluded to in a letter written by Mr. Glyn to Mr.
Moss immediately before. The official answer to that
letter, as printed in the statement of the Shrewsbury
Committee, and to the deputation whir-h attended
Lo wile and Birmingliem Board, was c•Dbxlied in the
s•,l;:tion of the Bid rd of 6th September are cnrimuni-
cated to the Grand Junction Board.
The London and, Birmingham Directors have only let
conelusion to express their deco regret that arrangements
ealculated in their opinon to promote the best interestsof
bib Con-Taws should hare been. marred ; but they arc
satisfied that no endyavours leave been wantine on their
rail to in:press upon thee Grand Junction Directors the
evil consequences which may result from the difference
with the Shropshire Comteittee.
By order cf. tkc Board,
CREED, Sec:eta-Ye
Office, Evsten Station, Oct. 21, 1844.

EASTERN UNION RAILWAY EXTENSION
FROM IPSWICH TO NORNN

CAPITAL £6:,0,000, IN 26,000 _MA RES OF £25
EACH.-DEPOSIT JOB. PER SHARE.

PROVISIONAL COMMITTEE.
John Chevallier Cabold, Etq., Chairman, Ipswich
Richard Dykes Alexander, Ipswich
J. Abbot, E.cf , Needbatn• market
J. Alexander, Esq., Ipswich
Samuel Bignold, Esq., Norwich
J. It Barnard, Esq., Norwich
Samuel Brooke, Esq., Diss
R. Wiffin Blake, Esq., Norwich
Thomas D. Burroughs. Esq , Norwich
S. S. Beare. Esq., Norwich.
Robert Blake, jan., Esq., Norwich
tlenry Bartlet, Esq., Ipswich
Henry Bond, Esq., Ipswich
Francis Cupiss, Esq.. Diss
John Cobh°kJ, Esq.. Ipswich
G. b. Coleman, esq., Sheriff of Norwich
H. Chamberlin, Esq., Norwich
Jeremiah Colman, Esq., Norwich
Charles Crawsbav, Esq., Norwich
Donald Dalrymple, Esq., Norwich
Thomas Dyson, Esq., Diss
W. Freeman, Esq., Mayor of Norwich
Robert Fincham, Esq., Diss
John Footman, Esq., Ipswich
'Thomas Pr-nch, E,q., Eye
Ellis Symonds Gowing, Esq., Mayor of Eye
Rohert Garron. Esq., Ipswich
John Gosna Esq., Rentley-hall
Charles,,Alnnm Gear,',i liontf Esq.oivfx,, Esq.,Nu;
,iclpirich
John G. Hart, Stowmarket
Robert J. Harvey, Esq., Mcu,:ehold-house
The Right lion. Lord Henniker, M.P.
Anthony Hudson, Esq., Norwich
James Hardy, Egg , Norwich
Jeremiah Head, Esq., Ipswich
C. H. Jones, Esq., Huddersfield
George Joiselyn, Esq., Ipswich
Li, n: Sir E. Kerrison, Bart, M.P., K.C.8.,
Edward Clarence Kerril,on, Esq.
Long,.Esq., Saxmundham
P.,B.'Lonfz, Esq., Ipswie,.
William Lao', Ipswich
William May, Esq , Mayor of Ipswich
Charles May, Esq., Ipswich
John Norate, Ipswich
Stephen Notcutt, jun., Esq., Ipswich
William Pratt, Esq., Norwich