The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1846-06-16 00:00:00

SKETCH OF IBRAHIM PACHA.

Ibrahim Pacha is the great lion of the day, and our
contemporaries are hard at work in raking up every par-
ticular of his birth and parentage. Oa the first, the
Observer throws great doubt, saying that it is really not
known whether he is the son of the reigning Pacha or not ;
or whether he is, according to Oriental custom, a son by
adoption. An English author has stated that he is the
son of Mehemet Ali's wife by a former husband ; but there
appears to be no real foundation for this statement. His
birth is supposed to have been in 1797. During the life-
time of Yussuff Pacha, his elder brother, but little atten-
tion was paid to him. In the East, as in England, elder
brothers are more highly regarded than their younger
brethren. Yussuff died in 1818, and the native energy of
character of Ibrahim Pacha having then developed itself,
he at once became the favourite son of the Pacha, and
was by him adopted as a partner in the toils of state, and
as his ultimate successor. His personal appearance would
stamp him as the true son and representative of the great
ruler of Egypt. In person and features he has a striking
resemblance to his reputed sire. Stern and unbending to
all others in the earlier part of their career, they were al-
ways, according to the report of every Eastern traveller,
tender and devoted to each other ; and now that the harder
traits in the characters of both have been modified and
softened by time and circumstances, they display the
same mutual affection. Ibrahim, in the most recent
works on the East, is represented to be the model of re-
spect and attention in the presence of his father, and the old
Pacha is said to indicate the same feelings of regard, and
almost of fear, for the energetic character of his fiery son.
Circumstances have endeared, and possibly rendered them
indispensable, to each other. When the task of sup-
pressing the Greek insurrection was assigned to Mehemet
Ali, and death had deprived that prince of his eldest son,
who moreover was said to have been of a mild and gentle
disposition unsuited to the purpose, no one seemed so fit
to aid him as the ready and ruthless Ibrahim. He was
accordingly at once dispatched, with the Captain Pacha,
from Constantinople to the Morea with a powerful fleet ;
and, though inferior in years, he soon proved himself to
be, both in stratagem and action, superior in the cabinet
as well as in the field. When the two admirals met at
Marmorice, the Captain Pacha, who had previously been
aft aid to expose himself alone to the Greek fleet in the
Dardanelles, endeavoured to persuade Ibrahim to sail
a!ong with him, and considerately proposed to him the
honour of leading in the van. Ibrahim, however, who
knew that the other loved him not, sagaciously inferred
that where there is honour there must be danger too ; and
when on inquiry he found that it was his own vessels that
might be first exposed to the dreaded encounter of the
Grecian fire-ships, he took precautions which at once re-
dounded to his own fame, and proved fatal to that of his
opponent. lie acquiesced, or seemed to acquiesce; but
instead of sailing direct upon the enemy's fleet, he
weathered it, and proceeded in the first instance to Samos,
and having taken this, he assailed the Greeks in rear,
without encountering the slightest risk from their fire-
ships at the opposite extremity, and dispersed and de-
stroyed the whole, after one of the most decisive actions
recorded in that long and disastrous warfare.
His subsequent course and career in the Morea are
well known ; and he must not be judged of according to
our English notions of war. Massacre and devastation
have always been associated with ideas of hostility in the
East; and, rated by the Turkish standard, Ibrahim was
was not a whit more sanguinary than every follower of
Mabommed ; while his policy was often marked by fea-
tures of a better order. If any one could have restored
the Morea to the Ottoman race, or reduced it to order at
all, it would have been Ibrahim by his stern resolution
and courageous conduct. But fate willed it otherwise and
the allies interposed. The issue of the struggle is well
known : the united British, French, and Russian fleets
met in the Archipelago, and at Navarino crushed the
Turko-Egyptian host. But, though defeated on this oc-
casion, Ibrahim lost no reputation. The fleet brought
out against him was overwhelming, and commanded by
officers against whom the followers of the crescent had
never been able to make head. Throughout the action
•his conduct was most courageous. During the whole of
it he remained conspicuously on the poop of his ship, is-
suing orders with promptitude and calmness ; and when
all was over be was found, by the British officer who
boarded him, smoking his pipe with the same serenity.
He had been defeated, but was not subdued; and had not
the Ottoman Porte wisely seen the expediency of discon-
tinuing the struggle, doubtless he would have maintained
it with the same imperturbable coolness while a ship or a
gun remained. _ _ _

Syria was the next field of importance of Ibrahim's
martial career ; and here he evinced, as a general, abilities
still greater than those which had marked his conduct as
a naval commander. The two services are, in modern
days, deemed incompatible ; but it was not so in the older
annals of English and European warfare, and it is not so
at present in fhe Turkish system of hostilities. The
leading Pasha there is still expected to take the command
of the Sultan's forces by sea or land, or both, as occasion
may require, as did our English commanders, Howard of
Effingham, the Earl of Essex, Raleigh, Drake, &c., in
the days of Elizabeth. But utility as well as custom
seems in favour of the separation, and Ibrahim has un-
doubtedly shown greater abilities as general than as
admiral. He has, to be sure, had inferior foes to contend
with, or at least, has not had to encounter the disciplined
forces of the East. But all reports concur in representing
his campaign to have been very able, and the troops over
which he triumphed were amongst the fiercest of the
eastern population. France has long exhausted her
strength against inferior forces in Africa, and Russia has
for many years in vain attempted to put clown a similar
race of men in Circassia; but Ibrahim. in two campaigns.
completely accomplished his task. The battle of Nezib
was memorable for its importance, as well as its sangui-
nary character; and for many years secured Syria to
Mehemet Ali's sway, until the country was again torn
from his grasp by the English, under Sir Charles Napier,
at St. Jean d'Acre.

His and his father's magnanimous conduct in allowing
free transit to our Indian mail and passengers while we
were dealing deadly blows at their power is well known,
and has already called forth the strongest expressions of
esteem and respect.
In so far as regards his personal appearance, this very
remarkable individual is no less striking than past events
have entitled him to be considered. His age is said not
to exceed fifty, but there is a general air of lassitude and
of wear and tear, which bespeak either a more advanced
period of life, or else that he has used the gifts of nature
somewhat freely.

FRENCH ETIQUETTE notices, what he considers a I
great rudeness in us, of which many Englishmen, on their
first arrival in France, are unconscious. The instance to
which I allude is this : one man, accompanied by many
others, meets a lady whom be knows, walking in the midst
of a party, among whom are gentlemen with whom he has
no acquaintance ; he bows to the lady, every gentleman on
his side raises his hat. and every gentleman in her suite
returns the salute. Nor is this etiquette limited to inter-
course with the fair sex ; the same courtesy is observed
between groups of men ; a bow to one is a signal for a ge-
neral salute. Now John Bull, at first, under the circum-
stances st Ited, takes no notice of a raised hat that is not
raised to himself individually ; and says to the ladies in
his company afterwards, when they perhaps school him
for his rudeness, " Why should I take off my hat, when
they did not bow to me ?" Of course such a person is
deemed a Me, in the first instance, by the Frenchmen.—
Rambles in .Normandy, by James Hairly, M.D.
TENDENCY OF A YANKEE SOLDIER TO DESERT.—
The troops, being divided into small detachments under
subordinate commands, have scarcely any opportunity of
being instructed in field movements or the other duties of
a camp, of which they rarely know anything. They neither
have the gait nor possess the military esprit belonging to
European troops, to assist them in the performance of
their duties, or to reconcile them to the change and vicis-
situdes of a soldier's life. Desertions are, in consequence,
very frequent; and, from the extensive field to which
they can escape, a deserter is very seldom returned to his
regiment. It is calculated that nearly one-half of the non-
commissioned officers and privates of the American army
desert every year. There is even much difficulty in bring-
ing them up in the first instance. No sooner do they en-
list, which is often under some sudden chagrin or disap-
pointment, than they aie confined in one or other of the
government forts, from where escape is almost impossi-
ble, until marched off, well watched and guarded, as so
many convicts on their way to transportation, for the re-
sidue of the period for which they may have enlisted.—
Wyse's America.
IRELAND AND FREE TRADE.—The Morning Chroni-
cle, in reply to the splendid article in Blackwood's Ma-
gazine, tracing the causes of the "Fall of Rome," and
showing that they are at work in the British empire, says
that " Italy had no products, either natural or manufac-
tured, to exchange for the corn it consumed." On this
the Cork Constitution pointedly says, " If this be the only
answer, what is to be said with regard to Ireland
What products has she 'to exchange for the corn she
consumes ' ? And if there be here a point, not of dis-
tinction, but of resemblance. are we not in the predica-
ment which, as respects England, the Chronicle dis-
claims ? And how are we to escape the conclusion to
which, on the Chronicle's own admission, the argument
of Blackwood leads? England may be safe, because she
has products, natural and manufactured, to exchange, and
constantly have we said that for England we had neither
care nor fear; but with regard to Ireland the case is dif-
ferent. She has a large population dependent, almost
exclusively, on labour put forth on land, and if that la-
bour is to be superseded by the labour of the foreigner—
if it is to be no longer employed in raising the corn con-
sumed in Ireland, in England and in Scotland, what is to
become of the millions who derive subsistence from it?
We know that, as many tell us, the land will not lie idle—
that if it does not grow corn it will feed cattle : and how
will that employ the people ? end how, without employ-
ment are they to make out life ? Does any one suppose,
moreover, that, in the midst of a starving population, the
cattle will be safe ? It will not do to tell them that bread
will be cheap. Bread can never be cheap to those who
have nothing to pay for it. The man of money may find
it cheap, but it is not the man of money we are concerned
for : it is the man who has but his head and hands to look
to, and who asks but leave to live by the labour which
Providence has made the condition of his lot. If this be

insured him under the new Corn Bill, we shall be com-
paratively content—we say comparatively, for we fear that
there are other classes who will suffer—suffer from no
fault of their own, but from the circumstance of having
their properties answerable for debts which they did not
incur, and for provisions for relatives which, even where
not dispioport:oned to the rental on which they were im-
posed, any considerable diminution in that rental would
render them unable to meet. Such cases are not rare i❑
Ireland, sad though we cannot expect a statesman to al-
low them to interfere with a measure which he believes
essential to the well-being of a country, it is not bv a
Statesman who has always denounced that measure as de-
trimental, and who has led the country to believe that in
him she had a security against its enactment—it is not
by such a Statesman they ought to be disregarded."

THE PREMIER'S REPLY TO LORD GEORGE
BENTINCK.

(From Sir Robert's Speech on Friday.)
The attack of the noble lord was couched in these
terms, " He said he was old enough to remember, and he
remembered with deep and heartfelt sorrow, the time
when the right hon. baronet (Sir R. Peel) chased and
hunted to death an illustrious relative of his (Lord G.
Bentinck's) on the ground that he could not support his
administration, and who, although he had changed no
opinion, was, from the situation he then held, likely to
forward the settlement of the question of Catholic eman-
cipation. Such was the conduct of the right lion. baronet
in 1827 ; but in 1829 he told the house that he had changed
his opinions in 1825, and had communicated that change
of opinion to Lord Liverpool. But that did not prevent
him in 1827 from getting up in the house and stating that
the reason he had separated himself from Mr. Canning's
administration was that he could not consent to support a
government of which the chief minister was favourable to
the then measure, which it appeared afterwards in two
years more he supported." The noble lord said he was
old enough to remember these circumstances. No doubt
he was old enough, for he was a member of the House of
Commons at the time, and be heard all that passed. It
is now nineteen years since these transactions occurred,
and seventeen years since the speech referred to in 1829
was made. Now, sir, I must say that I do respect the
feelings of a man who feels indignant at the conduct of
another who has hunted and chased a relative of his to
death—no doubt such feelings are to be respected in the
highest degree; but bow comes it that, entertaining those
feelings, for the first time I should have heard them ex-
pressed by the noble l'ird on the last night this measure
was under discussion ? (Cheers.) Since the year 1835 I
have been honoured by the noble lord's cordial, and I
must add, by I believe his pure and disinterested support
in this house. He has called me his right honourable
friend (cheering), and yet he was cognisant of all that
he stated on Monday night. The noble lord has been
one of the united political party with which I generally
act, and yet never until Monday, the Bth of June, 1846,
did I harbour any suspicion of ithe feelings of the noble
lord which he has thought proper to express with regard
to my conduct in 1827 and 1829. I no w, sir, say, that
the entertainment of those feelings by the noble lord
would be highly honourable, and I should respect the
noble lord for them if they were entertained apart from
politics, and if they were founded on facts. The noble
lord believes that I hunted and chased his noble relative
to death ; but, sir, I cannot understand, that entertaining
such feelings as those, the noble lord should have accepted
me as his political leader for so many years, and called
me his right hon. friend (cheers). I will now go on the
assumption that all the noble lord's charges are founded
on fact, and that I informed the Earl of Liverpool, in
1825, that my opinions on the Catholic question were
changed. The gravamen of the noble lord's charge is,
that I declined to act with Mr. Canning, as Secretary of
State for the Home Department in 1827 ; but that in
1822, when I was about to propose the removal of the
Roman Catholic disabilities, I then admitted that in 1825
my opinions on the question were changed. I am now,
sir, about to prove that this charge is utterly without
foundation. I made no declaration in 1825 that I did
not make in 1827 in the presence of Mr. Canning; and I
am surprised the noble lord should have made such a
charge without ascertaining whether or not it was well
grounded (hear, hear). That which I said in 1829 on the
subject corresponded with that which I said in 1827 in
the presence of 11Ir. Canning himself. It is more pain-
ful to me than it can be to any member of the house that
I should have to trouble it with any explanation on per-
sonal matters , but I believe that there is no man among
those even who cheered the remarks of the noble lord
who will not willingly allow me to give that explanation
(hear, hear). When speaking, on the Ist of May, 1827,
—and those hon. gentlemen who do not rely on my state-
ment will find the whole of these matters reported in the
debates of the Ist of May, 1827, and the 5t and 6th of
May, 1829—1 stated that I accepted office, the office of
Secretary of State for the Home Department, in the be-
ginning of the year 1822, and, in 1825, after I had been
left in minorities on three different questions connected
with Ireland, which were immediately in my department
—I mean the Catholic Relief Bill, the Franchise. Bill, and
the Bill for the Payment of the Catholic Clergy—l waited
on the Earl of Liverpool, and told him that it was painful
for me to dissever myself from those with whom I usually
acted, but that, having been left in minority on those three
occasions, I was anxious to be relieved from my situation.
My noble friend upon that occasion requested that I
should retain office, as upon my retirement, he said, his
own depended, and, on his solicitation, I consented to re-
main in office until a new parliament could have deter-
mined upon these questions. That declaration was made
by me in 1825, when I was responsible for the govern-
ment of Ireland, and was the only minister in the House
of Commons who was opposed to the Catholic claims.
The opposition was so strong, that my situation became
intolerable, and I wished to resign it. Mr. Canning
spoke afterwards, and said he should confirm the greater
part of the speech I made, and bore testimony to the
wish of himself and myself to keep up the friendship we
had formed. But he said that from the beginning of
the discussion of the measures under consideration at the
time, both of us foresaw that it must terminate in a sepa-
ration which he hoped to God would be only for a time.
What took place in 1828? In the month of January in
that year, the Duke of Wellington was called to power,
and a proposal was made to the friends of Mr. Canning,
as faithful and attached friends as the noble lord himself,
to give their support to the noble duke's administra-
tion. Did they refuse to co-operate? (Cheers.) Mr.
Huskisson, Mr. Grant, and the present Lord Melbourne.
made no objection on account of prevtous transactions in
Mr. Canning's lifetime, and within four or five months
after his death, to give their support to an administration
of which I was a member. (Hear, hear.) The gallant,
honourable, and chivalrous Marquis of Anglesea hesitated
not at the same time to take the government of Ireland
into his hands. (Hear.) The charge made by the noble
member for Lynn, that in 1829 I avowed a change of opi-
nion in 1825, which opinion in 1827 I concealed, is utterly
and entirely destitute of foundation. (Cheers.) I fore-
saw the difficulties which would result from the course of
policy her Majesty's government had pursued; but ne-
vertheless, considering that the public interests required
an adjustment of our commercial system, I hesitated not
to propose the change. (Cheers.) 1 foresaw the conse-
quence of our acts, and felt that they would probably lead
to the extinction of political power, and the abatement or
extinction of private friendship. But it is for the house
to judge of the reasons for cur undertaking those mea-
sures. (Hear.) But that we have been influenced by
any impure or dishonourable motives—that I wished so to
fortify my power, or that I was influenced by any desire
to court popularity, or to gain distinction or advantage of
any kind—l declare that such an imputation to me of mo-
tives so base would be as foul a calumny as a vindictive
spirit ever dictated for the destruction of a public man.
(Cheers.)

SPO It TING INTELLIGENCE.
ASCOT HEATH RACES.

The GOLD VASE given by her Majesty, added to a
Sweepstakes of 20 sovs. each, 110 subs., won somewhat
easily by two lengths, by Mr. T. Dawson's Grimston
(Lye), Coranna second, Khondoor third, and Mr Merry's
c. by Don John fourth. Romance, Burgundy, and Wood
Pigeon also ran.

SWEEPSTAKES of 100 sovs. each, won by a length by
Lord Chesterfield's Arkwright (Nat), Binnacle second,
Turpin third, and the Crown Prince fourth.
SWEEPSTAKES of 50 sovs. each, won by a length by
Lord Exeter's c. by Hetman Platoff (Mann), Lord Ches-
terfield's c by Don John second, Marmillio third, and
Field Mouse fourth.

The ROYAL HUNT CUP, value 200 sous., by subscrip-
tion of 10 sous. each, with 100 added, won by a length by
Mr. W. S. Stanley's Leaconfield (Carter), Ironmaster
second, and Colleen Bawn third. The Cure, Lightning,
Evenus, Aristotle, Wood Pigeon, The Devil-to-pay, Mr.
Godwin's g. by Advocate, Beaumont, Queen Pomare,
Mr. Thompson's m. by Monarch, Sir S. Sprigg's f. by
Sir Hercules, Rowland Hill, Gannet, Young Eclipse,
Mr. Mostyn's c. by Phoenix, Nell Cook, Farthing Can-
dle,. and Regalia, also ran.
The CORONATION SPARES of 100 BOYS. each, won
easily by two lengths by Mr. Ford's Guaraclia (J. How-
lett), Taurina second, Ellipsis third, Dawdle fourth, and
Birthday fifth.

On Thursday, being " Cup day," the course was
crowded, notwithstanding the absence of her Majesty and
Prince Albert. However, there was a novelty in the
presence of Ibrahim Pasha, who arrived at one o'clock,
with his suite, in three of the Royal carriages. the

sports commenced with the race for

•
HER MAJESTY'S PLATE of 100 guineas, which was
won by Mr. J. Drake's Bold Archer (Abdale), beating
Mr. Onslow's Ruff by a length.
The ST. JAMES'S PALACE STAKES of 100 sovs. each,
won by Lord Chesterfield's The Free Lance (Nat), beat-
ing Sir R. W. Bulkeley's Joinville and Lord G. Ben-
tinck's Binnacle.

The EMPEROR or RUSSIA'S CUP, value 500 soya.,
added to a Sweepstakes of 20 sovs. each, 23 subs., won
easily by a length by Mr. Greville's Alarm (Nat), Jericho
second, and Wolfdog third. Corranna, Forward, c. by
Don John, Peri, Inheritress, Mentor, The Baron, Miss
Sarah, Kesheng, and Orlando, also ran. Betting :-3 to
1 agst Alarm, 9 to 2 agst Wolfdog, 11 to 2 agst Jericho,
7 to 1 agst Orlando, 8 to 1 each agst Miss Sarah and The
Baron, and 18 to 1 agst Corranna.
The VISITORS' PLATE of 100 soya., won by Count
Bathayany's Gannet (J. Prince), Auld Lang Syne second.
The following also started :—lntrepid, The Conjuror,
Queen Pomare, Leaconfield, Bold Atelier, Snake, Leba-
non, Regalia, and Red Leg.
THREE HUNDRED SOVEREIGNS, the gift of the Great
Western Railway Company, added to a Handicap Sweep-
stakes of 10 sovs. each, 49 subs., won by Mr. Meiklam's
Lightning (Cartwright), Beaumont second. Nineteen
others also started. Betting :-3 to 1 agst Rowena, 8 to
1 agst Curiosity, 10 to 1 each agst Lightning, Chertsey,
and The Mangler, 12 to 1 agst Colleen Bawn, 15 to 1 agst
Sister to Pergularia, and Hi to 1 agst Akbar. Pineapple
was first off, but in a few strides gave up the lead to Col-
leen Bawn, and followed him in company with Rowena
to the turn. Rowena here showed in front, but was im-
mediately headed by Beaumont, who carried the running
on to the stand. Lightning, who had always lain well up
in the second ruck, now went in front, increased his speed
every stride, and won by a couple of lengths, Aristotle a
good third, and Akbar fourth.
SWEEPSTAKES of 300 sovs. each, 100 ft., 4 subs., won
in a canter by the Duke of Bedford's Leopard (Robinson),
beating Mr. Walker's Fuzbos. 3 and 4tol on Leopard.

DREADFUL DEATH.—At the Manchester hurdle race,
Byrne, the steeple-chase rider, was killed. A flight of
hurdles was placed at the foot of the hill, which, for a part
of the run in, is frightfully steep. Nine horses came down
the hill at an awful pace ; the leading horse fell over the
leap, and down went both horse and rider ; the next horse
leaped right upon them, and also the following horses,
planting their hoofs on Byrne's head and chest. He died
soon aft,or.

June 16, 1846.

THE COURT 4- FASHIONABLE WORLD.

The Queen and Prince Albert drove out in an open car-
riage and four on Saturday. This was her Majesty's first
appearance in public since her accouchement.
The names fixed upon by her Majesty for the youthful
Princess are " Helena Augusta Victoria," the sponsors
being the Duchess of Orleans, the Duchess of Cambridge,
and the Hereditary Grand Duke of Mecklenburg Strelitz.
The Duchess of Orleans is a near relative of Prince Al-
bert, and, as a Protestant, is the only member of the
French Royal Family who could perform the duties of
sponsor to an offspring of our Royal House.
The Queen Dowager will leave England for Germany
to-day.

The Grand Duke Constantine of Russia arrived on
Tuesday in Portsmouth. He is about nineteen.
Prince Albert honoured the Benchers of Lincoln's-inn
with his company at dinner, on Wednesday, at their new
hail.

It is Prince Albert of Prussia, and not. as stated in the
German papers, the consort of Queen Victoria, who is
expected at St. Petersburgh. _

The King of Saxony has conferred on Mr. Colguhoun
the rank of Commander of the Civil Order of Merit of
Saxony.

The Countess de Han Han, the celebrated. German
novelist, has arrived in London, and was at the assembly
given by the Duke of Devonshire on Saturday night.
On Wednesday, the marriage of the Duke of Marlbo-
rough and the Hon. Charlotte Augusta Flower, youngest
daughter of Viscount Ashbrook, was solemnised at Lam-
bash Palace by spacial license.

Viscountesi' Ilardinge,accompanied by the Hon. Miss
Hardinge and Major and the Hon. Mrs. Cunningham,
has arrived in town from Nice. Her ladyship has been
in Italy and Switzerland ever since the departure of the
Governor-General for India. It was her ladyship's in-
tention to have gone to India by the overland route • but
after a few days at sea it was evident that her health
would not admit of so great an effort.
IBRAHIM PACIIA.—His highness left Portsmouth for
London, on Monday morning, and arrived at Mivart's Ho-
tel at noon. He took a carriage drive late in the evening to
Regent's Park, where the Pacha alighted from his car-
riage, and walked some distance in the enjoyment of his
cigar. On Tuesday morning he proceeded early to Buc-
kingham Palace, and afterwards attended a grand inspec-
tion of the guards, accompanied by Prince Albert, the
Duke of Wellington, Prince George of Cambridge, and a
vast number of the nobility. The Pacha, in returning
from the parade, was cordially cheered by the populace.
His highness was occupied in various ways during the day,
and at night attended a grand assembly at Lady Peel's.
On Wednesday, his highness visited the tower, the bank,
the mint, and numerous other national edifices and insti-
tutions. On Thursday he paid a visit to Ascot Heath
races with a gorgeous retinue, and conducted by the mas-
ter of her Majesty's household. He has since been visit-
ing other places. We understand bis Highness's suite
intend to leave for a tour in the provinces and the High-
lands of Scotland towards the close of this week.

LONDON G.IZETTI

-TUESDAY, JUNE 9.

PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED

- .
W. L. and J. W. Lewis, Stroud, Gloncestershire, mercers—
J. and W. H. Evans, Bath, surgeons—G. Smith, sen. A.
Elder, and P. Stewart, Cornhill, boolcseller—A. Nicklin, and
E. Forster, Wolverhampton, brush manufacturers—J. and G.
Gay, Queen-street-place, Southwark Bridge, merchants—J.
Shoolbred, G. Cook and H. Brown, Tottenham-court-road, Lon-
don. as far as regards G. Cook—J. and E. Grisbrook; Wool-
wich—J. G. Turner and W. Price, Leeds, stockbrokers—G. H.
Newton and H. Peck, Kingston-upon-Hull,cement rnanufac-
ttu ers—R. Hyslop and J. Dubois, Gosport, carriers—J. Ridg-
way and J. Tayl,r, Staylybridge, Cheshire, corn dealersl-A.
Tagliabue and F. Ciceri, Brook-street, Holborn, barometer-
manufacturers—W. George and J. Schewring, West Bromwich-
Staffordshire, porter dealers—H. Bury and J. P. Crewe, Accrings
ton, Lancashire, engineers—T. and W. Birtwisle, J. Haydock,
and W. Preston, Great Harwood, Lancashire, cotton-spinner,
—G. Long and G. Taylor, Stafford, auctioneers—J. T. Holland
and T. Cross, Coventry, railway contractors—J. Imray and W.
Fitch, Old Fish-street-hill, London, wholesale-stationers—J.
Jesse and W. Bevan, Manchester, surgeons—E. Brown and G.
Trafford, Louth, Lincolnshire, carriers—J. Catchoole and C.
Williams, Regent-street, goldsmiths.

.OANKRUPTS

John Gisborne, Coleman-street, London, merchant.
John Richard Miskin, Chatham, tea dealer.
Jesse Smith, Wellington-street, Newington•causeway, Lon-
don, cheesemonger.
Edward Weeks, King's-road, Chelsea, hothouse-builder.
John Wright, Oxford street, London, druggist.
John Child, Wakefield, grocer.
Charles Gallimore, Birmingham, pearl button-maker.
Frances Freeman Phillips, Bristol, coach maker.
John Scott, Sheffield, flour dealer.
Frederick Sly, Truro, currier.