The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1851-03-18 00:00:00

LOR Of thf

y alteration this year in the
sirs of the College of Maynooth.—ln
Mr. Urquhart, Lord PALMERSTON Slid
been issued for the evacuation of the Da
s the Russian and Turkish forces
rian refugees, there were orig,
had been set free by the Turks
:s would be glad also to set tree, but Austria

tion to make

the ordinary re

inally 7I of

nrigary should
British Goverr

lore fully
t that all

g Ceylo

;he Exchequer to bring A
ile such a motion was bar
lerefore postpor
ouncement

their heads.

its statement till of
s received with shouts of la'

i postp,

In fact, it was importan
ward without delay, whil

ther with

out the rion-formation of a
ELL said he fully expected

have been made, and the Secretary Of the
assured him that he had made every exer-
T. DCNCOMBE said that Mr. Canning had

_ -.les of the underlings of the Go-
t, to make a house ; secondly, to keep a
aly, to cheer the minister. (A laugh.) This,
ey had neglected to do, and the noble lord had
e neglected the Jews.—Mr. HATTER, amidst
declared that he hi.d done all in his power to
but although there were several hon. members
e. they evinced a great disinclination to go in.—

rid thiri

ppeared

had no r

lit to cc

of Ant

a of being t

for he had

1 SURREY

Sir R. Inglis, that the Pop(

from the
the Pope

of the noble lord himself in that hou
to assume, that although the noble lord would not
such a measure, yet that he would not object to it if dor
nd were comparatively few; but the,
i with Christian fortitude,—if, indeed

Catholics of
bear this per

leavour to

but they would, in every cOnstiiutic
event its becoming law.—Mr. REYNO
ROUNDELL PALMER
be best judges of their
1 to dictate to them as to NO
I be, savoured of_ the very worst species

seconded
tended t
ecclesias

terests

olics wer,
-Id to pret

ople, it would be then time enough to provide
R. INums said he was prepared to take the

a principle, and he would
aich, however inefficient.

le must, however, say that be Was dissatisfied with
t of the Government in the whole matter, and that
ol to him that the noble lord at its head had lost, on
1, that moral courage for which he had been previ-
ble. He would support the bill cheerfully, and
I be carried by a large majority of the house.—

this (
ously remarKa
hoped it would
Sir R. PEEL st
lead him to th:
extend to all

4ted that tt

ameiit to Protestantisr
ailed upon to do other,

ment bad
tc

I, never

con
fer ft
model by v

_less, support th
nobleiprd at the head of t

rut, the circumstar

rtant clauses. Ir
ng obliged to dif•

wholly different to t

late upon a degree of opposition to the operation of the bill in
Ireland which might render the attempt to extend it there idle
and unprofitable. In concluding, the bon. baronet said he
viewed this aggression of the Pope as merely a first step, which
would surely be followed by others, and he therefore called
upon the noble lord at the head of the government of this great
empire to be watchful, and called upon the house to guard,. by
timely legislation, against the first advances of Rome against

the principles of religious liberty. Mr. INl`Cumkoit quoted
various cases, in which the Roman Catholic bishops had been
recognised by their ecclesiastical titles in the Irish courts of
law. He then contended that the omission of the second and
third clauses of the bill made no alteration in the effect it
would have if passed, and quoted tbe opinions of three English
barristers of eminence to that effect. Mr. P. WOOD replied to
the speech of Mr. R. Palmer, which, able as he admitted it to
t _....,11,1e55. founded on a fallacious basis;

oe, was, nevertne,,,., -
was well known that the clergy of the Roman Catholic Church so

mixed up tempura' with spiritual ma

...----
iViewasgeiting in the wedge, which would be followed by an
attempt to introduce the canon law into this country. He
believed the speeches of Sir James Graham in that house, and
of a noble lord in another place, bad thrown the cause of civil
and religious liberty back for two or three centuries. He re-
garded the bill as one of great importance, and would certainly
support its second reading. Mr. MoorcE then moved the ad-
journment of the debate, which was at once agreed to.