The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1851-09-16 00:00:00

remanded on a charge Of bigam

Ito stated that she I

t the shop door;
ry it away, when tt

xes in the town, named V

a will take my ads
You tee these rec

iwing put to the

stated that the prisoner
ts,x times discharged.—Mr,

officer state
the prison

their manceuvrin
them down to tin

delusion on tt
that Daniels I

The prisoners v

uel Stevenson, a man re
id costs, for a violent BSE
women, on the nreviot

The tine was

granting of pt

week, was resumed on the followi
West Derby Ward a number of at
hut only one was granted, to Jo
Erskine. street, Brunswick-road
Ward the only license grant
street, corner of Rodney.
Ward, the application of Joseph Rich,
and Mary lilies, Sefton-street, were ace,
fella license was granted to George I__
place. The court then adjourned until Fri
when the business was resumed, the maffi!

bench being John Holmes, T. B_.
V. Yatt-S, W. Rathbone, J. Stewar, __--...
Esqrs. Mr. Robertson Gladstone was also present duri
a portiun of the time, but appeared to take no part in t.
proceedings. The case of Mr. Shuttleworth, box boot
keeper at the Theatre Royal and Royal Amphitheatre, foi E
a license to a house at the corner of Lord Nelson-street, I }
which had been adjourned in order that the lease
on
.the premises might be executed, was first aro- _

J.-11. Turn

license was at once granted.—ln a dispunfu
between " Mercer v. Smith," with a respect to a house in f
Horatio-street, it was stated that the parties had ar- r
ranged differences, and that Mr. Mercer was to be the 1
tenant. The licence was granted. Mr. Bremner

tor, who appeared on behalf of the Licensed Victuallers pitintetri
Association, then called the attention of the bench to a
license which had been granted to Mary lilies, in North H ibbui

which he s

Out been surreptitious

uau ammo nersett to be a widow, vn u
whereas she was a married woman separated from her Atitche
husband. The magistrates held that they could not in- fann ,
tti
terfere with the decision which they had given, but stated on tt
that they would be glad for any information to guide their late Ed.
future proceedings in respect to the party. Mr. John On tt
Parry a' -lied for 'le rem- 'of a retail license - John I-'

„ _ ro a store
in Canning-place (between South John-street and South
Castle-street.) Mr. Snowball opposed theapplicat ion on the
ground that the license had been obtained some years ago
by a Mr. Polding. it was obtained on the express con-
dition and understanding that it was not to be converted -
into a dram-shop,—that it was to be used simply as a place i‘)ow
to supply shipping and sell liquors in the bottle.—Mr. 8
'On it
Parry said that the lease had been granted to him without. I,old of
any restriction as to what he shout'
to carry on the business hir._
agreement fell through.—Mr. Rathbo

Aad Wen(

,elf, only ti

the present application as nothing more than :d.o-w-n;ighi
fraud upoa the magistrates.—Aftcr a consultation; Mr.
Holmes intimated that the license would be granted.—
Mr. Edward Irving, of Preston-street, appeared to apply
for a license for a house in Pteston-street. It appeared
that the house 'in question bad been pulled down. the
front wall alone remaining. The applicant was instr,
to apply when the place was finished.—ne bench
began to consider five applications from wholesale at(
for-liberty to retail i-Ill'erquantities than the t
specifies. The followil
—,ison, Regent-road ; 1

I On

in a
lions of spirits which th
Wm.

Crowther, Chapel-street
W. M. Cmtis, Dale-str
Mr. Bremner said h
behalf of the Licenset,
t"ication of Mr. NA

qixon, Crown-s

vet,
had been instructed to of
1 Victuallers' Association.

le Opp
intend

) keep public_
only for

Ile applicants could
license es an " inn, alehouse, or victual.
and the magistrates, if they granted such
must grant thera

liWg hous,

licenses.

COLUILLUI: 411.i4;b 6r. of Liel'Zc