The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1848-01-04 00:00:00

RAILWAY AFFAIRS.

Tast week's Gazette contains notices of the dissolution
of some twenty railway companies. This we look upon
as one of the most favourable signs of the week, and one
that will lead to substantial results.

CHRISTMAS TRAFFIC.—During the Christmas week
the Great Western Company carried 23,000 persons. The
receipts for passengers at the Paddington station, on Fri-
day, December 24, amounted to £1,950.
The London and North-Western Railway Company
have undertaken to build a mechanic's hall at Wolverton,
for their workpeople, at a cost of £3,000, to include a lec-
ture-room, a tea-room, a library and reading-room, and a
ladies' room. _ _

A resolution to abide by the reference Proposed for set-
tling the differences between the Edinburgh, Leith and
Granton and the Edinburgh and Northern was adopted at
a special meeting of the former company. The sum of
£340,000 is to be applied to the works of the Granton
proprietors.

The proportion of goods traffic on the Eastern Counties
Pt Uway-tc Largaly_audia. wan en .L.onaon and. .i.NimetL-
Western. It is chiefly of an agricultural nature, and is
very encouraging to other lines of a similar character ;
those, for instance, which traverse the rich district of
I Lincolnshire—as the East Lincolnshire, and the various
branches of the Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire.
DEPRECIATION OF RAILWAY PROPERTY.--Letters
from Hamburgh mention an extraordinary case of depre-
ciation of railway property. The railway from Schwerin
to Wismar and Rostock, a distance of about 50 English
miles, and finished within about 10 English miles, will
be offered for sale by public competition, as, notwith-
standing 80 per cent. of the capital has been paid, the
shares find no purchasers at present at 40 per cent. and less.
RAILWAY TRAFFIC FOR 1847.—1 t appears that the
traffic on railways in the United Kingdom during the
year 1847 amounts to about £8,950,000, being an increase
over that of the preceding year of £1,285,000, or nearly
17 per cent. The aggregate length of railway over which
the traffic was conveyed in the first month of 1847 was
about 2,710 miles, and in the last month of that year
about 3,420 miles. Taking the average length of railway
for the year at 3,100 miles, it would give £2,887 as the
average traffic per mile per annum.
LIVERPOOL, CROSBY, AND SOUTHPORT RAILWAY.--
The first half-yearly meeting of this company was held at
the Clarendon-rooms, Liverpool, on Saturday. Mr. W.
Blundell, of Ince, presided. The Secretary read the re-
port, which stated that the act received the royal assent
on the 2d of July last ; that the total expenses of obtaining
the act amount to £8,187 7s. ld., exclusive of a sum of
£4,000 paid to the West Lancashire Company under the
award of Messrs. Bidder and Stephenson ; that the balance
now in the bank to the credit of the company was
£9,326 ; and that the engagements entered into for the
purchase of land will render it necessary to make a call
of £2 per share, payable on the Ist of June next. No
further call will be required within the present year. In
consequence of the general depression in trade, and the high
rate of interest, the directors have not thought it desirable
to adopt any measures for the immediate construction
of the whole line ; but with regard to that portion of it
which lies between Waterloo and Southport, as a consi-
derable part of this land is given free, and the cost of con-
struction
will be very light, it appeared to the directors, if
the owners of the remainder of the land would allow time
for payment, that it might be advantageous to proceed

with the construction of that part of the line, which would
involve a comparatively small amount of outlay. They
therefore thought it proper to instruct the engineer to
make the necessary survey, and his opinion was favourable
to proceeding with the line from Waterloo to Crosby. A
somewhat lengthy discussion took place, Mr. Crosthwaite
contending that in the 'present state of the money market
it was not desirable to proceed with the works ; but ulti-
mately the report, including the recommendation to the
directors to proceed with the works, was carried.

DIOCESE OF HEREFORD.-ELECTION OF
DR. HAMPDEN.

Tuesday being the day appointed for the election of a
Bishop of Hereford, vacant by the promotion of the Right
Rev. Thomas Musgrave, D.D., to the Archbishopric of
York, the interest, which had been increasing for some
weeks past, arrived at its highest pitch, and several hun-
dred persons flocked into Hereford at an early hour, be-
ing anxious to witness the proceedings.
The Very Rev. John Merewether, D.D., Dean of
Hereford, entered the Ladye Chapel of the Cathedral
shortly after eleven o'clock, being accompanied by the
Canons Residentiary, the Prebendaries, and the officials
of the Cathedral.
There were present—The Rev. H. H. Morgan, 8.D.,
the Rev. H. Huntingford, D.C.L., the Hon. Lord Saye
and Sele, D.C.L., the Rev. W. P. Musgrave, M.A.,
Canons Residentiary of the Cathedral Church of Hereford ;
the Rev. Thomas Huntingford, M.A., Precenter ; the
Rev. E. Howell, Succentor ; Mr. Chancellor Morgan, the
Rev. J. Garbett, M.A., treasurer ; the Venerable - Arch-
deacon Wetherall, 8.D., the Venerable Archdeacon
Vickers, M.A., and the following Prebendaries :—The
Rev. C. Swainson, M.A., the Rev. C. Garbett. M.A., the
Rev. C. S. Luxmore, M.A., the Hon. and Rev. Orlando
Forrester, M.A., the Hon. and Rev. J. Somers Cocks,
M.A., the Rev. J. Johnson, M.A., the Hon. H. Rodney,
M.A. the Rev. J. Clutton, M.A., the Rev. H. Lee, 8.D.,
the Rev. J. Hopton, M.A, the Rev. R. Briscoe, M.A.,
the Rev. C. Taylor, M.A., the Rev. W. E. Evans, M.A.,
the Rev. W. J. Thornton, M.A., the Rev. John Venn,
M.A., the Rev. G. -F. Lewis, and the Rev. P. Budd,
M.A., and others.

Some other formalities having been gone 'through, the
names of the Canons were called, and their assent or
dissent from the appointment of Dr. Hampden was taken.
Two or three of the Junior Canons voted successively for
Dr. Hanr)den. On the name of Canon Huntingford
being -calf_ d, that gentleman rose and said :—With the
utmost respect for the Royal prerogative, and with the
full conviction that it is for the peace and safety of the
Chyrch, that the Crown alone should nominate to vacant
sees, yet on this particular occasion I feel bound to defer
complying with the recommendation which has been sent
down to us until a competent tribunal shall have pro-
nounced to be well founded or not the sentiments ex-
pressed by so many bishops of our Church, and by so
many members of our Universities.

One or two other persons having tendered their assents,
it became the duty of the Dean of Hereford (Dr. Mere-
wether) to record his vote.
The Dean rose amidst breathless silence, and said :—I
am standinOn the sanctuary of the Most High God, and,
together with my brethren, the ordained ministers of
our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, am called upon, in the
name of the Sovereign of this land, to choose and elect
such a person as may be meet to be the bishop and pastor
of this diocese. I solemnly declare in the Divine pre-
sence, that it is my earnest and hearty desire to be faith-
ful and bear true allegiance, to pay all humble duty and
submissive obedience to her Most Excellent Majesty the
the Queen of these realms, who, I feel assured, on her
part, " Knowing whose minister she is, will, above all
things, seek His honour and glory who is the King of
Kings and Lord of Lords ;" _to whom, above all, I owe

my first allegiance. [The Dean then referred to 'the re-
commendation of the Crown to elect Dr. Hampden, and
the steps taken by himself and the 13 bishops to prevent
such election.] He then proceeded :—On taking these cir-
cumstances into my most serious consideration, I did most
humbly and most imploringly supplicate that her Majesty
might even yet be pleased to re-consider this earnest and dis-
interested prayer, to correct and amend the errors and
misfortunes which have arisen, and still more seriously
threaten us with the ill-considered advice of a misinformed
minister, as on other occasions her Majesty's royal pre-
decessors have done, and so avert the injury which must
otherwise be inflicted on the church, and pacify the out-
raged
feelings of her members. And here in the sight of
God, in the midst of His temple, and in the performence of
the priestly office, I solemnly protest that it is no defici-
ency in the smallest degree, of loyalty and humble devo-
tion to our sovereign, it is is the dictate of my conscience,
the conviction of my mind, which constrains me so to act
in arresting the progress of infidelity, mockery of reli-
gion, and profaneness. Upon these grounds I cannot
vote for the election of Dr. Hampden as bishop of the va-
cant see of Hereford, and pastor of the cathedral church
of which I am dean ; and I do hereby protest against this
proceeding to-day, inasmuch as many persons have voted
who are merely honorary prebendaries, and have not com-
plied with the statutes of this church, which I have de-
clared I will observe, and I protest against the majority
which will be claimed, inasmuch as it is necessary for giv-
ing validity to a vote, that the majority should include the
Dean and three canons residentiary. This protest I shall
forward to the Crown, the bishop elect (Dr. Hampden),
and the Archbishop of Canterbury.
A warm discussion here took place respecting the right
of the Honorary Canons to vote, in the course of which it
was alleged that the Dean had pledged himself to allow,
without opposition, the votes of those rev. gentlemen
against whom he now protested.
Archdeacon Musgrave then remarked that, as-a report
of the proceedings of that day would in all probability go
forth to the public, he wished to call attention to the fact
that, in the observations which had been made by the
Very Rev. the Dean, that gentleman had stated that the
primate of England had joined the thirteen bishops in op-
position to the appointment of Dr. Hampden. It did not
appear to him (the Archdeacon) that there was suffici-
ent authority for that statement, as the name of the Arch-
bishop of Canterbury was not to be found in the list of
remonstrant bishops, as published to the world.

The Dean would not Lave stated so solemnly and so
positively that the Archbishop had protested against the
appointment of Dr. Hampden had he not known that
such was the case. Previous to the protest which was
signed by so many of the right rev. prelates, the Arch-
bishop wrote to Lord John Russell, pointing out the dan-
gers which would result to the church if the appointment
were persisted in. Other bishops, too, had adopted the
same course, although their names did not appear on the
list.

Archdeacon Musgrave.--I have not seen :any notice
taken of that circumstance.

The Dean of Hereford.—Well, I take notice of it, and I
make the statement on my own responsibility.
After a smart discussion on that point, _
The Dean said.—l will now proceed to state to you_the
number of votes polled.
For Dr. Hampden.—Three Canons Residentiary.
Five Prebendaries of the old order.
Six junior Prebendaries.
Agst.Dr. Hampden.—The Dean. _

One Canon Residentiary.
The Canons residentiary who voted in favour of Dr,
Hampden were Lord Saye and Sele, the H. Rev. H ,

Morgan , B.D. and the Venerable Archdeacon Musgrave.
The Canon itesidentiary who voted against Dr. Hamp-
den was Dr. Huntingford.
Canon Morgan moved that the election of Dr. Hamp-
den should be declared according to the usual formalities.
Lord Saye and Sele seconded the motion.
The Dean remarked that having stated that there were
for Dr. Hampden 14 votes, against him 2, it remained for
the Chapter to say whether that was an election of Dr.
Hampden or not. The statute required that there should
be a unanimous assent and consent. After some discus-
sion on this point, the motion proposed by Canon Mor-
gan, and seconded by Lord Saye and Sele, was agreed to.
The secular business of the day was brought to a close,
and the Dean and Chapter returned to the Choir, and
proceeded with the usual services of the church.

With reference to the question of the validity of the
election, the Times remarks :—The Dean of Hereford has
adopted or acquiesced in a course of proceeding which, to
a popular apprehension, will assume the appearance of a
compromise, but the true character of which we leave to
the lawyers to decide. In order to the validity of the
election, it was necessary that it should be unanimous, as
we believe to be generally the cite in ecclesiastical elec-
tions. The Dean and Mr. Canon Huntingford, when it
came to their turn, voted against Dr. Hampden. Thus
far the Dean fulfilled the pledge in his letter of the 22nd
instant. On a comparison of the suffrages, however, and
On It nnneiu-Ine hnt nil thpinnnihrrn of the chi =n~Tus
were present, whatever their rank or right, had voted in
the affirmative, and on its being further proposed and
carried that the customary documents should be issued,
and declaration read, the Dean contented himself with
contributing the agency of his office to the prescriptive
forms of an unanimous election."

f
wi
aTt
mhh
pead:Bnai
,sdhi
dnorpews
hso
ref
from
hmx fi
so
trLhdoe
rhdas sh
clergyi addressed dsdthraeet se s esh
tadhdaatt
ailkne
et
compliance
e rp
proceed-
ings e De
dr..
ings against him (Dr. Hampden) as rector of Evrehne, in
the diocese of Oxford, under the Clergy Discipline Bill,
but that subsequent explanations had induced his Lord-
ship not to sanction the proceedings being carried further.
The Bishop says, in the course of his letter :
" Regarding the Observations on Dissent as virtually
withdrawn, I applied myself to a thorough and impartial
examination of the Banipton Lectures. I have now care-
fully studied them throughout, with the aid of those ex-
planations of their meaning which you have furnished,
both publicly since their first publication, and now in your
private communications. The result of this examination,
I am bound plainly to declare, is my own conviction that
they do not justly warrant those suspicions of unsound-
ness to which they have given rise, and which, so long as
I trusted to selected extracts, I myself shared. For these
suspicions of your meaning, and for the consequent dis-
trust of the University, I must with equal frankness say
that I discern the cause (whilst your works remained thus
unexplained, and the minds of men unassured by your full
profession of the faith) in what appears to me a not unfre-
quent overstatement of favourite views, and much obscu-
rity of diction, resulting often from the arbitrary use of
such words as ' facts.' doctrines,' proved,' deduced,'
&c. ; and hence I believe it happened that men of such
various parties in the church concurred not unnaturally in
the expression of a painful distrust of your meaning. But
allowing for these as the blemishes of what was, I believe,
a necessarily hasty composition, and taking into account,
as I now can, your various explanations and assurances, I
find in the lectures little which will not admit of a favour-
able construction." _ _

The Bishop concludes by expressing his intention to
withdraw the letters of request, and his opinion that
Dr. Hampden had glen such explanations as may well
suffice to quiet all just ,klarm at his consecration to the
office of a bishop..

An address has been forwarded to Dr.. Hampden:bt
fifteen heads of houses at Oxford, who express their con.,
fidence in the soundness of his doctrines,
and their regret:
at the opposition offered to his appointment to the see of
Hereford. The University of Oxford has but twenty-font
heads of houses ; and of these, fifteen have signed the: address, one is so advanced in years as to take no share
in public business, another is Dr. Hampden himself, and,
four others are believed to be favourable to the addresq'
three
sympathise they have declined signing it; so that only three
sympathise with the movement against Dr. Hampden. r,
The Rev. T. B. Johnstone, rector of Clutton, ne
Bristol, who signed a protest against Dr. Hampden'
elevation to the episcopal bench, has published a letter, •
which he says :—" Dr. Hampden's letter to Lord Jo
Russell has completely removed from my mind the del
sion under which I signed a protest from this deane
against his appointment to the see of Hereford. I be
thus publicly to retract that signature, and express mt
hope and trust that the Bishop-elect may prove a bulwark
against the Tractarian heresy. As on old Cambridge
111. A., I was led to doubt the orthodoxy of an Oxford,
man ; but the truly Christian letter, to which I have
alluded, has completely removed all doubt froth my mind '
and I shall heartily rejoice to see Dr. Hampden where h
ought to be."

A letter of explanation has also appeared from the Bishop
of Salisbury, in which the right rev. prelate endeavours to
reconcile his vote for Dr. Hampden in 1836, when the
Doctor's offence, whatever it had been, was completed,.
with his protest against the rev. divine in 1847.
" Presbyter" of the Times., who has battled so bitterly
against Dr. Hampden, is said to be the incumbent of
Bearwood, Berkshire, and brother-in-law of Mr. New-
man.

It is said that three at least of the remonstrant bishops
have expressed their satisfaction at Dr. Hampden's letter
to Lord John Russell, and are about to withdraw their
remonstrance, if they have not done so already.
A SECRET WORTH KNOWING.—After all the hubbub
of addresses, remonstrances, &c. &c. to the Queen,
against the Bishop if Hereford, the Secretary of State for
the Home Department has received not more than twenty
—some places sending two and even three—many of them
with one to four signatures. Indeed, the average of the
whole will not give twenty signatures to each address.
ANOTHER QUOTATION FROM DR. HAMPDEN'S WORKS.
—" If I believed there were anything in this work ( the
`Bampton Lectures') to shake the faith of the humblest
disciple—to obscure or lower the great truth of Christ
crucified—to lead any one to deny the Lord that bought
him, or to confess his Saviour in any other sense than ILS
the Lord his Righteousness,' his `LORD AND HIS GOD,'
in sincerity and truth—or to apostatize in any degree from
the pure scriptural faith of the Catholic Church of Christ
—I would be the first to erase such a passage from my
work and utterly to disown it."—lntroduction to the 2nd
Edition of B. L., p. lxxxix-xc.

THE DEAN OF HEREFORD'S MEMORIAL TO THE
QUEEN.—This document, on examination at the Home-
office, was found to have been originally intended for
the dean and chapter of that see. In every instance
after the words, " We, the Dean, there occurs an erasure
and a red ink line. Surely, as the dean was disappointed
of carrying the chapter with him (although he had
reckoned so sure that he had the memorial " cut and
dried" previous to the meeting), it would have been far
more decorous to have sent a fresh copy in the singular
number for himself than to have presented to the Queen
such a document !
At the decease of the late king, the Dean of Hereford
was deputy-clerk of the closet, and in this capacity at-
tended him on his death-bed. The dying monarch, at
the solicitation of Queen Adelaide, whose good opinion
the dean had been so fortunate as to gain, is said to have
recommended him to Lord Melbourne for a bishopric.
For reasons, the cogency of which will now be appre-
ciated, that minister did not think fit to comply with the
suggestion; but at once took steps for dismissing Ar.
Merewether from his office of deputy-clerk of the closet.
The worthy dignitary flew to his royal patroness ;' and the
influence of the Queen Dowager, has hitherto preserved
him from this humiliation. Presuming, probably, on the
request of the late king, which, however it might have
escaped the memory of her majesty's advisers, he himself
had not forgotten,---Dr. Merewether memorialized the
queen for the vacant see of Hereford, and was refused.
That such an application was made by him now appears
to be unquestionable.
A letter has been addressed to Lord John Russell by
thirty clergymen of the county of Bedford, approving
strongly of Dr. Hampden's appointment to the see of
Hereford. Among the signatures we perceive that of the
Rev. T. Grimshawe, the venerable Vicar of Biddenham.
In his Lordship's reply he alludes to the two objections
raised against the appointment, viz., the vote of the Ox-
ford Convocation; and secondly, suspected unsoundness
in the faith. His lordship acknowledges to have received ,
privately from the Archbishop of Canterbury an intima- •
tion that Dr. Hampden's elevation would be disapproved
ae
sf
fboyl
ot the i:112.j3 niteyt o
ef s t hneo ct g y
mis
t,
sakned
oceo
rn c Ipuodsei
tsi
ohni s.letter
Church is not in that easy security of the last century
which gave birth to so much negligence, to so much
abuse of her wealth, to such a perilous apathy. The
church of Rome on the one side, with abundant know-
ledge, with imposing authoritp, seduces many to her com-
munion. The right of private judgment is by many
avoided as a dangerous snare ; the duty of private judg-
ment is thrown off by many more as too heavy a burden.
On the other side, the Protestant Dissenter assails the
church establishment as an engine for fettering the con-
science and taxing the property of the subject. Novelties
have their charm? the high ehurolmacm cu.a th.ind.pandent
speak alike withAcomplaca!key ofeeparatingehurch and state. --
I know no better security against such a danger than,
an able and learned episcopal bench,—a zealous and
God-fearing parochial clergy. Thus may the Refor-
mation be defended, thus may the establishment be
maintained; otherwise, neither Parliament nor preemu- ,
nire can beat off the assailants of our church constitution.
The
hhu
eet
ri i
eat
p isps
osnianoi
tdumls
eehave
rf
ydi
Dins
rgt
Thpeile dal
oc
ttesh, ewn
hp
teeona
tet
heh
ee or
pef rts hmne
ao
ce
pyheuaprcreeoh. d
yoked a party whose unrelenting fury pursued him to the =
day of his death. They denounced him as a Socinian and
an Atheist ; yet our Great Deliverer never made a wiser e
or more judicious appointment. In our own day we have
seen the learned Dr. Lloyd, once Regius Professor of
Divinity at Oxford, pursued with bitter invective, when
on the Roman Catholic Relief Bill he gave expression to •
the loftiest feelings of Christian charity. You have
spoken with praise of the sermons of Dr. Hampden, and
your testimony is in this respect peculiarly valuable. '
You consider his appointment as 'a circumstance favour-
able
to the health of the church.' It is with that view that,
unconnected with and personally unknown to Dr. Hamp- '
den, I have recommended him to the favour of my Sove-
reign. I earnestly and devoutly hope that your anticipa-
tions and mine may, by the blessing of God, be amply
fulfilled."

STATIONS OF THE BRITISH ARMY,

ON TIIR IST JANUARY, 1848,

(From Colbanez United Service Magazine.)

47thlikillisu°fitncbilnlaesettli
- _
[Where two placee are mentio4s46n9Booettttdhhhh_.(he last-named is that at
which the dep6t of the 4 regimentr6sttthhh______ tilarap,
nu
46th—Halifax,
stationed.]
Ist Life Guards—Regent's Prk 36th—(1st batt.) Corfu.
2d Ditto—Hyde Park (2d batt.) Cephalonia
Royal H. Guards—Windsor 37th--Ceylon, Chatham
Ist Drag.Guards—Birmingham 38th—Jamaica, Boyle
2d--Newbridge 39th—Gosport.
40th—GalwayagaGx.h,HGoupeern, LseofyWight ;
batt., Bermuda.
3d—Piershill
Ist Dragoons—Cahir
4th—Nottingham 41st—Clare Castle
42d—Bermuda,
jusbkatll,:nlcslaepoefGW.
Highoret ;
sth—York
Gibraltar
6thh--CD.uGndoolcHope,
2d—Athlone Maidstone
thhaatni: .1:1 e Wight
3d—Bengal, Maidstone
4th—Dublin
sth-
-6th—Newbridge
,sio:cutbhatliam
7th Hussars—Dublia
Bth—Baliincollig
____B eßnogn
ta lb,
aM ay ,
Maid-i d s t n
555321 51st—Madras, tioel ar
ten dag
asgrtitital
54th—Malta, Exeter
14th
—Bengal, 556672ttd1i.,
58th—N. S. Wales, Chatham
55th—Tempientore
12th Lancers—Hounslow
59th—Templenaore
Hussars—Coventrytal lonnacesearasr—a
ttbiblaaatm, Chatm.
Ist ht.
63d—C(211-11
9thllo tt
hh Ls
15thstHonuessars—Madras,
DMarair.d-
16th Lancers—Brighton
17th—Dublin
Grenadier Guards— (2d bt.) Gosport
(Ist batt.) Windsor 61st—Bengal, Chatham
(2d batt.) St. George's Da •
(3d batt.) Portman-et. 64th—Limerick
Coldstream Guards-
- RatltatlY ant.- . 65t11—N. S Wales, Chatham.
06th—Gibr. ltar, Kinsale
Scotch Fusileer *Guards— 67th—Corka68th—Mullingar
(2d batt.)ood 69th—Malta
Ist Foot— . 70th—Cork
(Ist batt.)—Antigua, Paisley 71st—Glasgow
(2d batf.)—Newry Reserve batt., Canada.
Brecon
12th
2d—Athlone
11th—N. S. W'
ad—Belfast
73d—Cape G. Hope, Birr
10th—Bengal
4th—Madras, Chatham
(Ist batt.)
74th—Dublin
sth—Mauritius
6th—Cape G. Hope
8777
6952
tttdhhh—EGGDßi
oibubmrbr
79th—Gibraltar
86th—Bombay,
Intatayari,
,CPAhataiusil :jay: a r
76th—Portsmouth
St,
The
John's Tower
vir
7th—Barbadoes, Dublin 77th—Canada—Nenagh
Bth—Bombay, Chatl'm 78th—Bombay, Chatham
9th—Winchester
80th—Bengal, Chatham
' Reserve batt., Mauritius 83d—Kilkenny
13tk—Birr 84th—Madras, Chatham
14th—Plymouth 85th—Dublin
12th—Mauritius,
saitshlCeahmofatha Wight;
8821
ds t--HDaelii
82d—Halifax,
0,
N.
s.,
15th—Ceylon, Chester
16th—Corfu, Youghal 87th—Weedon
17th—Dover 88th—Barbadoes—Tralee
18th—Bengal, Chatham 89th—Ashton-under-Lyne
19th—St. Vincent, Castlebar 90th—Cape G. Hope, Sheerness
20th—Canada, Isle of Wight ; 91st—Cape of Good Hope, Goa.-
Reserve batt., Canada Port
21st—Madras, Chatham Reserve batt., Cape of G.
22(1—Bombay, Chatham Hope •
23(1—Halifax, Isle of Wight ; 92d—Limerick
Hope, Fort G. 97th-Malta, Reserve batt., Canada 93d—Canada, Aberdeen
24th—Bengal, Chatham
Isleaies ,0
fC Chatham
a
94th—Madras, Chatham
25th—Madras, Chatham 95th—China, Naas
28th—Bombay, Chatham Reserve batt. Malta.
29th—Bengal, Chatham 98th—Bengal, Chatham
sOth—Newcastle-on-Tyne 99th—N. S. Wales, Chatham
31st—Manchester Rifle Brigade-
-32d-Bengal, Chatham (Ist Batt.) Cape of G. Hope,
27th—Cape
33(I—N. Brunswick, Stirling C. Bristol
34th—Corfu, Waterford
Bcusptteevaa.nt
(2d batt.) Canada, Isle it
35th—Mauritius, Jersey Wight
Reserve batt., Quebec,

COLONIAL CORPS.
Ist West India Regiment—Jamaica
2d Ditto—Nassau
3d Ditto—Demerara, Sierra Leone, &c.
Ceylon Rifle Regiment—Ceylon
Royal Canadian Rifle Regiment—Canada
Cape Mounted Riflemen—Cape of Good Hope
Royal Newfoundland Veteran Company—Newfolandlline:
Royal Malta Fencibles—majta
St. Helen Regiment—St. Helm