The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1851-03-18 00:00:00

THE PAPAL AGGRESSION.

The pseudo Bishop of Hexham, Dr. Hogarth, has di-
vided his " diocese" into " deaneries," as a further step
in the progress of the Romish organization.
The London Common. Council, on Thursday, agreed to
a petition to Parliament for stringent measures against the
the Papal- Austrian aggression, and also for protection to
the dying against designing priests.
The Morning Post mentions as a curious fact, that the
Peel party are almost to a man deeply tainted with Trac-
tarianism. Some of them, indeed, are actually Romish,
though still retaining the Protestant name.
in a recent lecture, at Northampton, on Popery, the
Rev. Hugh Stowell is reported by the local Herald to
have stated that " he did not believe that in any Church
on earth, succession, in unbroken links, could be traced
from the Apostles ; he never saw it satisfactorily made
out."

The Very Reverend the Dean of Bristol has published
a long letter in the columns of a contemporary, calling
attention to the Manning-Mill-and-Wilberforce-protest ;
the effect of which was a virtual denial of the " Royal
Supremacy," As Mr. Liddell, (the designated suceessor
of Mr. Bennett,) is said to have signed the protest, the
dean very properly warns the Bishop of London not to
institute Mr. Liddell before he makes inquiry into a mat-
ter which is of serious importance.
The Rev. W. Palmer has written to the Bishop of Lon-
don, complaining that Dr. Pusey, in his recent pamphlet,
has so introduced Mr. Palmer's name as to make it ap-
pear that Dr. Palmer fully agrees with Dr. Pusey. The
reverend gentleman clearly believes that the Regius Pro-
fessor is nearer to Popery than himself. Dr. Pusey re-
plies that he only quoted Mr. Palmer because he thought
that on certain points they agreed ; and, with regard to
image-worship, of which Dr. Pusey stands accused, he
repudiates such an idea; but advocates the manifestation
towards them of " natural actions, or tokens, of love."
NATIONAL CLUB.—We have much gratification in an-
nouncing that a meeting of the parliamentary members of
this club was held on Thursday, at the Club House, Old
Palace-yard, to decidifon the course to be adopted on the
second reading of the Ecclesiastical Titles' Assumption
Bill, when a resolution was passed expressive of a deter-
mination to press for an immediate and efficient measure.
The meeting was numerously attended, and the most per-
fect unanimity of sentiment prevailed. As their number
now is upwards of forty, it is impossible that their com-
bined action can be.without its influence at the pre3ent
momentous crisis.

ROMANISM AND THE GOVERNMENT.—The Home Se-
cretary, in acknowledging to Archbishop Murray the re-
ceipt of the address to the Queen, styled that divine
"My Lord," and " Your Grace." Let us say that in
our judgment the conferring of these temporal titles is a
much more direct infringement of the Queen's preroga-
tive, as the sole fountain of honour, than the assumption
of the spiritual title of bishop of any place. These titles
are not incident to ecclesiastical office.• The Bishop of
Sodor and Man, though appointed by the Queen, would
be addressed by Sir George Grey as• " Right Reverend
Sir." The Pope's usurped Bishop of Dublin is acknow-
ledged by the Queen's Minister as " My Lord," and
" Your Grace."

MEETING OF THE LONDON' CLEEGY.—On Thursday
morning, a meeting of the incumbents of livings in and
around the metropolis was held in the great ball of Sion
College for the purpose of taking into consideration the
modification of the Ecclesiastical Titles• Bill recently pro-
posed byLord J. Russell, and deciding upon the propriety
of petitioning Parliament to amend and strengthen that
enactment. The following resolution was passed unani-

mously
That it is the opinion of this meeting. the Bill now before
the House of Commons is insufficient for repelling, the Papal

Aggression, and altogether below the expressed wishes of the
people of Great Britain ; and that therefore a petition ought to
be presented to both Houses of Parliament' praying them to
pass a sufficient and satisfactory measure."'

We have from Ireland an epistle from "John, Arch-
bishop of Tuam," to the Premier, declaring that " his
Grace" will not hear of the measure in any shape,—first
clause or fourth is equally odious as second or third. No
mitigation, short of utter extinction, will satisfy the peo-
ple of Ireland :

"The eyes of all are now turned to Parliament, watching to
see whether their members are at their posts, th-ongh, like the
Roman senator of old, they should be carried thither on their
couches. No apology can henceforth plead with the people if
those members do not exert themselves in stopping the tresent
penal enactment. Opposition—stern, persevering opposition—
to your hateful measure, in season and out of season, is the
paramount duty of every Irish member of Parliament, as well
as opposition to every other measure yon propose, until you
abandon the bill which, in an evil hour, you proposed, or until
once more you abandon the helm."

The Earl of Winchilsea has addressed an appeal,
through the Times, to his " Brother Protestants and Fel-
low Countrymen," in which he states that if he at first
thought the bill'of Lord John Russell against Papal ag-
gression " puerile and nugatory ;" he need hardly say
that now, in its mutilated shape, it is " characterised by
the grossest and most daring insult which was ever offered
by any Government to the Protestant feeling of this great
empire." His lordship concludes :

"By the memory-of our immortal ancestors, who cheerfully
laid down their lives -in defence of our Protestant faith, and
bequeathed to us—their degenerate and apostate children—
those civil and religious liberties which had been' sealed with
their blood, as our best and most invaluable of all earthly
inheritances, I call upon every Protestant of the empire to
spurn from them this grovelling and contemptiblemeasure, and,
sinking all minor differences, to unite heart and soul in ad-
dressing the Throne for a dissolution of Parliament, that the
sense of the electors may be taken on this important subject,
and in declaring to our gracious Sovereign in language which
cannot be misunderstood, that those Protestant principles
which placed the house of Brunswick upon the British throne
must be firmly maintained, and that Protestant England, with
one voice, declares she will have no compromise with the
Church of Rome."

THE GOVERNMENT AND THE ORANGEMMIC—A short
time since, Captain Archdall gave notice that he would
ask the Secretary for the Home Department-why he had
refused to lay before her Majesty the addresses on the
subject of the papal aggression, recently forwarded for
presentation by the Orangemen of England and Ireland.
Sir G. Grey met the difficulty by an expedient, which,
we must in charity hope, he would be incapable of adopt-
ing in any private transaction between man and man, and
with a cool, brazen effrontery that implies the most ex-
traordinary powers of face, he boldly asserted that the
Orange addresses had been presented to her Majesty in
1848 through a mere " oversight" ! ! This is the most
extraordinary specimen of parliamentary assurance it has
yet been our fortune to see. Sir G. Grey would have us
believe that he and Lord Clarendon, by an extraordinary
coincidence, both committed exactly the same " over-
sight" at exactly the same time, and that-they each re-
peated this identical " oversight" on several successive
occasions, and that too at a period when the "oversight"
in question-squared most conveniently with the political
necessities of the day. This chapter of accidents is some-
what too marvellous to be easily credited:
ANTI-PAPAL AGGRESSION ADDRESSES.—A return has
been obtained by Mr. Newdegate, and was issued on
Thursday, setting forth the number of addresses which
have been presented to Her Majesty on the recent mea-
sures taken by the Pope with regard to this country,
whence they enanated, and the number of signatures to
each. The total number of these addresses is 3,145. bear-
ing 1;006,708 signatures, besides two Roman Catholic
addresses expressing loyalty and fidelity, with 255.961
signatures. They are classified according to their origin
in the following manner :—archbishops and bishops of the
united' church of England and Ireland, 1 ; deans and
chapters of cathedral or collegiate churches, 10 ; church
of Scotland, ministers and elders, 1; clergy of the United
Church of England and Ireland, 89-; clergy and others,
880; Wesleyan Committee of Privileges, 1; Protestant
dissenting ministers of the three denominations, 1; uni-
versities—viz., Oxford, Cambridge,. Durham, and St.
Andrew's, 4 colleges—Royal. College of Physicians,
Queen's College, Birmingham, Sion College, London,
the " Bedden," York, 4 ; hospitals, 2; county meetings
35 ; other public meetings, 139 ; corporations, 46; asso-
ciations or other bodies, 20; city of London, 4 ; members
of the English bar, 1 ; attorneys, solicitors, and proctors
of England and Wales, 1;. Isle of Man, 1 ; Society for
Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1.
THE COLONIAL SECRETARY'S PATRONAGE OF Po-
PERY.—A return has been obtained by Sir R. H. Inglis
on the subject of the precedence given to Popish prelates
in the Australian colonies by command of Earl Grey. The
return consists of a despatch from Governor Sir C. A.,
Fitzroy to Earl Grey, dated July 30, 1850, enclosing a
communication addressed to the governor on the 22d of
May, the transmission of which the governor had delayed.
" in the hope that on further consideration the Bishop of
Sydney would not think it worth while to raise this ques.
tion again." Neither, has Earl Grey, it appears, thought
fit hitherto to take. any notice of the bishop's commu-
nication. The bishop's letter to the governor is a reply
to the intimation conveyed to him from Earl Grey
through the colonial secretary, at Sydney, that " accord-
ing to the true, construction of the directions respecting
the precedence of Roman Catholic prelates, conveyed in
the despatch of the 20th of November, 1847, the bishop of
the Church of England in New South Wales ought to
Thavehe bishop- rece dence states ohf
st he
intention, Ro m a n C
in act ho
no lsiecvaernc he
eb i sohf otph.;
concession, to attend the levee at the government house
on the Queen's birthday, the difficulty about his own
precedence being obviated, and after protesting against
the substitution of the designation '' the bishop of the
Church of England in New South Wales," for his proper
title, " the Lord Bishop of Sydney,"' proceeds to com-
ment on the effect which Earl Grey's circular still would
have on the other bishops of the province.
APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION.—it is every way worthy of
most serious consideration, that when an inspired apostle
was about to finish his earthly course, and addressed a
very solemn charge to one of his immediate successors in
the ministry of the church, he did not use any such lan-
guage as the Lord Jesus used to the chosen vessels of
inspiration. St. Paul did not say to Timothy, "As the
Lord sent me, even so send I you." No such thing, but
St. Paul said to Timothy. "- I charge thee therefore before
God,tahn edtwhaone
rddt.
dead at h
h,e Lord
Preach i Js easpupset
haappearing Christ,
ngword."
o radn.dwh, who
shi shall judgeliwn gasd
o n mot,h quick
pear
part
preach
of
Timothy's mission to testify from himself, as if the Holy
Spirit of truth hail been promised to him in the same
way that he was promised to the disciples : but his mis-
sion was to preach the word. I pray you mark the diffe-
rence as a matter of fact. And here at this stage, we
must cut off the " Even so I send you" for ever ; the
" Even so" is not continued. The change is instanta-
neous, and not a mere gradual process, shading off
among the fathers of the primitive church ; it is cut off
at once. Between " Even so send I you" and " Preach
the word" there is a great gulf fixed—between inspiration
and non-inspiration, between infallibility and fallibility,
between Timothy and Paul. "As the father sent me,
even so send I you," and he breathed the Holy Ghost
upon them, and he spoke as infallibly as Jesus spoke.
But the next step, mark it—" I charge you before God,
preach the word." So far as they preached the word,
and only so far, they prolonged the testimony of Jesus.
—Rep. Hugh znreite,

Mardi 18, 1851.

CIVIL AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY AS UNDER-
STOOD BY ROMANISTS.

(From the Kerry Post.)
An election for the office of !raster of the Dingle work-
house took place recently ; and the contest lying between
a Protestant and a Romanist, the priests of that district
made it a religious question, urging and threatening from
the altars of the chapels on the preceding Sabbaths in
favour of the Roman Catholic candidate—though he
was evidently most unfit for the onerous duties of the
office, while the other has much experience in the manage-
ment of workhouses. There were two elections :on the
first day the votes for each candidate were equal, and on
the second the Protestant candidate was returned by a
majority of one. Now mark the result. The new vote
happened to be given by a Roman Catholic farmer named
O'Donnell, from near Inch ; and last week, as this man
was returning home from market, after night had fallen,
he was waylaid and received so desperate a beating, that
at first serious fears were entertained for his recovery.

(From the London Times.)

At the Roman Catholic meeting in London, on Mon-
day, after Mr. Serjeant Shee had spoken, a stout gentle-
man, with moustachios, stood up, and-claimed to be heard
for one moment. He rushed to the front of the platform,
and was received by a storm of groans and hisses. He
exclaimed that "his name was Kaiser" (or " Keyser;"
we won't answer for the orthography), and that " he only
wanted to ask a question—one question of the chairman ;
but, as the gentlemen on the platform were evidently not
inclined to indulge his inquisitive turn of mind, the shouts
in the hall soon grew into yells, and Mr. Kaiser deter-
mined to have some information on a subject in which he
seemed to take so much interest, leant over the reporters'
table, and, with undeniable energy of voice, exclaimed,
" 1 wish to ask the chairman if he agrees with the Pope
in the prosecution he has set on foot against the Jews in
Rome at the present time ?" If he had heaped up a
whole orchard of apples of discord before the unfortunate
querist could not have more excited the wrath of the
assembly, not, however, against the Pope, but against
himself. The screaming was frantic. One gentleman, is
red. hair and spectacles, who looked like an ecclesiastic,
rushed forward from behind the chairman, shook his
fist at the offending Kaiser, while his words were lost in
the storm. An elderly woman, with a very large and
stout umbrella, poked him on the shins and lower extremi-
ties with great vigour and animosity, while the invitations
to " kick him out," from the platform and body of the
meeting, were of a very vehement and unanimous charac-
ter. Kaiser having repeated the question in the most
intrepid manner, for the satisfaction of himself and a con-
fidential reporter, descended from the platform with some
declarations respecting the behaviour of the rope to the
Jews, and was speedily eliminated from the meeting by a
very vigorous physical process, which some few of the
gentlemen on the platform endeavoured to moderate.

ROMISH NUNNERIES.-EXTRAORDINARY

PETITION

The following is the petition presented on Friday by
Sir R. Inglis, which is referred to in our parliamentary
report :

THE PETITION OF CRAVEN FITZHARDINGE BERKELEY.
`• To the Honourable the Commons of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, in Parliament
assembled ;

" Humbly lioweth,--That he intermarried with
Augusta Talbot, the widow of George Henry Talbot, who
was the half-brother to the present Earl of Shrewsbury-
That the said George Henry Talbot left two children him
surviving, namely,. John, who was heir presumptive to
the earldom, and Augusta, an infant, now of the age of
19 years and upwards.
" That the said infant Augusta Talbot resided with
your petitioner and her mother up to the time of the
death of the latter, which took place on the 25th of April,
1841.

" That since that period, and up to the month of Sept.
last, the said infant Augusta Talbot has resided with the
Earl and Countess of Shrewsbury.

'• That in consequence of the death of the said John
Talbot, the said infant Augusta Talbot became absolutely
entitled to a sum of £BO,OOO, or thereabouts.
" That the said infant Augusta Talbot is a ward of the
Court of Chancery.

" That in the month of September last the said Earl
and Countess of Shrewsbury placed the said infant,
Augusta Talbot, (notwithstanding she is a ward of court
as aforesaid) at the convent called the ' Lodge,' situate
at Taunton, in the county of Somerset, not as a pupil or
visitor, but as a postulant, with the avowed object of
allowing the said Augusta Talbot to take the veil, and
become a nun.

• " That in the month of September next the period of
probation, or postulaney, will have expired, and the said
infant, Augusta Talbot,. will be compelled by the rules
and regulations of the said convent, and by the priesthood
of the Roman Catholic Church, to take the white veil
during her minority, and notwithstanding the said infant►
Augusta Talbot, is a ward of the Court of Chancery.
" That having taking the white veil, there is no retreat
for the said infant Augusta Talbot, and she will be com-
pelled to take the black veil in September, 1852, or
shortly afterwards.

" That on the 6th of Tune, 1852, the said infant Au-
gusta Talbot will attain her 21st year, when she will be-
come entitled to receive the said sum of £BO,OOO.
" That being a nun at that period, the £80,090 wil
become confisuated to the said convent, or to the ecclesi-
astical revenues of the Church of Rome; or to the endoW-
ment, enrichment. or maintenance of some bishop,k,
deanery, or other ecclesiastical benefice of the said Church
of Rome ; or the said infant Augusta Talbot will be com-
pelled by some assurance in the law, to transfer all her
right and interest in the said sum of £BO,OOO.
"That it is one of the doctrines of the Church of
Rome, that no member of the said Church shall be per-
mitted to exercise his or her private judgment in religious'
matters ; but that in -all such religious matters, be or she
is bound to submit to the authority of the said Romig',
Church, and to the direction of the priesthood thereof.

•
" That in a certain-work by Nicholas Wiseman, who /9-
a high eceesiastical authority in the Romish Church, 00
the principal doctrines and practices in the said Romisb
Church, under the head of ' Lecture 1.,' introduction,
page 16, the following passage occurs :-6 The Catholic'
Church is thus as a city to which avenues lead from every
side, towards which men may travel from any quarter,
by the most diversified roads; by the thorny and rugged,.
ways of strict investigation—by the more flowery paths of
sentiment and feeling, but arrived at its precincts, all find,
that there is but one door to the sheepfold, narrow one
low perhaps, and causing flesh and blood to stoop as it
passes in. They may wander about its outskirts ; :they'
may admire the goodliness of its edifices And its bulwarks,
but they cannot be its denizens and children if they enter
not by that one gate of absolute unconditional submission
to the teaching of the Church.'
" That in the said work, under the head of Lecture
page 76,- the following passage occurs :—` For the
moment any Catholic doubts not alone the principle of
his faith, but any of those doctrines which are thereon
based,—the moment he allows himself to call in question
any of the dogmas which the Catholic Church teaches
as having been handed down within her,—that moment'
the Church conceives him to have virtually abandoned all'
connection with her; for she exacts such implicit obedi*
ence, that if any member, however valuable, however bee,
may have devoted his early talents to the illustration 0'
her doctrines, fall away from his belief in any one point,
he is cut off without reserve; and we have, in our °W¢`
times, seen striking and awful instances of this fact.' ~,
That the above opinions and declarations of the saw-
Nicholas Wiseman are the true doctrines,of. the Roman.
Catholic Church ; and that the said infant, Augusta Tal-
bot, has had them instilled into her mind; to the exclusion'
of all nther principles ; and that the said infant, Augusta
Talbot, is bound to submit to the will and dictation of
the superior of the said convent and to the priesthood'
the Church of Rome.
_ _

"That your petitioner is deprived of all communication
and connection with his step-daughter, the said infant,
Augusta Talbot ; and your petitioner's daughter, the half-
sister and only near female relative of the said infant.
Augusta Talbot, is also prevented from cultivating those
natural feelings of affection which, but for the reason 4
aforesaid, would exist and grow up between them to their
mutual comfort and support.
" Your petitioner, therefore, humbly prays that the
honourable the Commons of the United Kingdom 1:"
Great Britain and Ireland will be pleased to take his pe t
tion into their serious consideration, and that they wl"
be pleased to engraft a clause in the bill entitled the
Ecclesiastical Titles Assumption Bill,' now before their
honourable house, which will prevent such practices ad
are detailed in the said petition from taking place; an
that they will introduce a clause enacting that no infants
whether a ward in Chancery or not, shall be permitted to
be placed by her parents, or guardian, or any other per-
son whomsoever, in any convent or seminary, or place of
education, or other institution attached to the Church of
Rome, as a postulant, during the minority of such infant,
for the purpose of enabling or compelling any such infant
to become a nun, and that in the event of any infant or
infants being now or hereafter placed within the walls of
any convent, seminary, place of education, or other insti-
tution attached to the said Church of Rome as a postulant
for the purpose of becoming a nun, that the propertlt
whether absolute or contingent, of any such infant or
infants shall vest in and insure to the use of her Majesty'
and shall and may be disposed of as her Majesty shall be.
pleased, by warrant under her sign manual, to direct or
appoint. Or that a clause may be introduced into the
said bill for throwing protection round young persons who
now are, or may be hereafter placed in convents with .9..
view of taking the veil therein, and appropriating the"
property thereto, either by placing such establishments
under the supervision of inspectors appointed by Govern:
ment, or by such other means as to the honourable lion!!;
-- seem best calculated to put a stop to the aforesaid

practices

And your petitioner will ever pray.
(Signed)
" CRAVEN FITZHARDINGE BERKELEY
Berkeley-house, Spring-gardens."

THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY AND THE RUBRIC'
-It is understood that the Archbishop of Canterbury
o
proposes to bring the rubrical question to an issue in bl.
diocese. His grace is said to have been in correspond
for some time past with several clergymen of his dioceSe
on the subject ofalleged Romanizing practices ; someof the
clergy at once yielding to his Grace, whilst others yin'!"
cated their proceedings as being conformable to the rubile'
in one case, that of the Rev. C. S. Caffin, of Westerhoni,
Kent, who persisted, after the Archbishop's private id
monstrance, in intoning the prayers, his Grace has issue
a monition, enjoining the discontinuance of the practice'
with a view to further proceedings in the Ecclesiastip!:
Court, in the event of non-compliance. An applicator;
to the Court of Queen's Bench is spoken of, to supersed.
the monition, on the supposition of its trenching upoU
liberty of the clergy to perform the service according
their own discretion, within the tonna of the rubric!

TO TEE EDITOR OP THE LIVERPOOL STANDARD.
SlR,—With whatever arrangements it may interfere, in
Whatever quarter it may fail to give comfort, it is no less
a stern and sullen fact that a dissolution is the only
remedy for the present ministerial confusion and incom-
Petence a few months, at most, is all that the worst fears
of the merest sycophant of the Russell Administration
'eves us to prepare for a general election. How they are
to survive these few months, with the prestige of their
Putt defeats and the prospect of future humiliations and
reverses, we are not told ; and perhaps " they know the
''moon why:" the public convenience may tolerate them
Until the urgent business of the session is discharged—it
toleration be possible. Their tergiversation, however, on
BAnti-Papal Bill goes far to solve the problem ; and as
' b•
inn ills BUDGET in the middle of their embarrass-
!nent, and their having made confusion more confounded,
they may have the discretion, if rot the gallantry, to again
tea away To this, I think it very likely, it will come
r long; and then will come the time of trial; t the
°e,g-looked-for test of popular opinion will be made
in this ordeal Liverpool will have a protest to vindicate
and a Protestant -character to maintain! Her protest
against the repeal of the navigation laws was unheeded by
her representatives, and spurned with contempt and scorn
her representatives, and spurned with contempt and scorn
tY others ' • that protest she must preserve and substan-
tiate. The religion of the country is assailed, and Liver-
pool is unrepresented on the question ; neither the one
nor the other of her members ever raise their voices to
exonerate her from any participation in that indifference
which, in many high places, unhappily prevails. I believe
e cannot, I suppose the other will not. This state of
airs must be rectified and improved. I believe the
majority of the editors of this town-not only object to the
Presumptuous assumptions of the Tope and his cardinals,
but view with jealousy and mistrust the cold-heartedness
of the members for the borough. But, sir, where are
the 'signs of preparation ? During the late crisis, (a
crisis even yet not terminated,) yourself and another
,Or two sounded a few notes of warning. Has that warning
"een heeded ? Has ,
liorsfall, been unanimously
,ntation of Liverpool ? If 'not, it is time it was done,
titivfweb,_ave any wish to avoid the distractions which will
invariably induce defeat. It was well said, more than a
and, ago, " There is not a day—not an hour to spare ;"
of r, sir, I am sure (looking at the temper of the House
`-'eelanons) he must be a madman or something worse
who fancies that the Russell Cabinet can '
present session ;—if such be the case, the ses,..
a very, very short one,-or the Cabinet must have a supe,
natural existence.
, However, most people are agreed that a dissolution is
Inevitable. The question is, are the people of Liverpool,
:rfe,!he people of Enkland, prepared to fight `• t he:Batt'
the've:..Co__nsti.tution,'" as they fought it in 1841"? or

anther rand

,te, that will joi

to contest the

the
on will be

ide it civ

b„:, Prepared to sanction, with their approbation, the
of Free Traders and Romanists, of Peelism and
Tractarianism, of Whiggism and tergiversation'?
I, This is the question they will have to answer, and to do
it This
they should merge all minor differences
a set to weT • • , . , • ,
not do to 1
0e
„,..is 'Upon us.
We Were oni
tb3 penalty--db at fatal lesson !—surely, w
171 of that degradation !
(1,!,, not, then I say it is time our coat
lued, for every circumstance on the
mgrs us of an approaching struggle, -ot
sezgeneY, of which I would that ever
it! 4s, because then every man woul

:o prepare for t

ggle When

taken' by surprise, and we paid the ri
eat ! Surely, we have not yet forgotten

f action was

,olitical horizor

an was eon-

,ared to meet

1 am, sir, Eo

`ECTI 0 N 1 ST

26th of February he had received no reply from Com-
mander Platthy, of the Austrian man-of-war Phoenix,
who said is to consider England fair•game since the refute'
to give redressin the case of Marshal Haynau. The cap-
tain of the Albert being anxious to sail, Mr. Moore made
himself responsible for any just claim the Austrian might
have upon tire English vessel, upon which she was suf-
fered to depart.—John Bull.

TUESDAY, M

—•.••• .....
Dieppe--Bonanza, Moody, from 1

Monte Videc