The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1851-11-25 00:00:00

Champagne, Claret, Moselle, &C. &c,

London Stout, the finest quality only, in quarts 6s. Gd., pints
3s. 6(1. per dozen.
TERMS:—CASH ONLY.

Country orders are sent, carriage free, to any Station on the
Direct Lines of Railway, throughout the Kingdom.

J. MOTT AND SONS,
TVINE AND SPIRIT MERCHANTS,
WHOLESALE AND RETAIL,
SOUTH CASTLE-STREET, (CORN ER OF THOMAS
STREET,) LIVERPOOL,
AND MARKET-PLACE. LEICESTER.

THE PRIZE MEDAL.
RILE Medal awarded for and honourable mention
P
made of the GLENFIELD PATENT STARCH, at the
Great Exhibition. See pages 57 and 63, Class 111., Jury IV.,
of " List of Awards," printed by authority of the Royal
Commissioners. _ _ _

Being thus doubly noticed for its " General Superiority," (a of steam, the papeii-enclosed in the inner box were rendered
mark of distinction conferred on no other,) by the Royal Corn- moist. It was a comfort for one to know that there was an in-
missioners and Jury, from amongst Thirty or Forty Exhibitors, vention, by which valuable documents might be rendered secure,
sets it far above every other of its Competitors. notwithstanding the terrible calamity of fire breaking out in a
The Ladies are therefore respectfully requested to make a house. Although the defendant had thought fit to say it was
trial of the GLENFIELD PATENT DOUBLE-REFINED not useful, he was really at a loss to say what evidence there
POWDRR "TARCH, which, for .domestic use, now stands was to raise any doubt as to its utility ; but the question was
UNRIVALLED, and is now used in the Royal Laundry. for them alone. Now came the direction he should give them
T E ST I M 0 N I A L S.—The following highly-respectable in point of law, and in this they must be guided by what he said.
Testimonials are adduced 16 show the estimation in which the He thought there might be an infringement, although the de-
Glenfield Patent Double:Refined Powder Starch is held by fendant did not use vessels, pipes, or tubes for containing the
those who are in the habit of using it regularly : liquid. All the rest he left to them ; but he only said that it
Copy of Testimetiai from the Laundress to Her Majesty : was not indispensably necessary that the defendant should use
" Mr. Wotherspoon, 40, Dunlop-street, Glasgow. The Glen- pipes, tubes, or artificial vessels, but they were to consider
field Patent Powder Starch has now been used for some time whether the evidence was sufficient to convince them that the
in that Department of the Royal Laundry where all the finest defendant had infringed the patent. They would bear in mind
Goods are Finished for Her Majesty, Prince Albert, and the that respectable professors from King's College, and other
Royal Family, and I have much pleasure in informing you that seminaries of learning, had been called for the defendant, and
it has given the highest satisfaction. M. wain'', Laundress they would consider Whether they disproved the infringement,
to Her Majesty.—Royal Laundry, Richmond, near London, Tann's
patent could only be evidence on the ground of infringe-
15th May, 1851." went, for it was not taken out until nearly four years after
Testimonial from the Lady Mayoress of London •—" The Milner's; but if, as it would appear that Harrison sold Tann's
Lady Mayoress begs to thank Messrs. Pantin and Turner for a boxes, he could not say that They were not to look to Tann'e
Box of Glenfield Patent Double-Refined Powder Starch, menu- specification, if they came to the conclusion that the boxes made
factured by Mr. Wotherspoon, of Glasgow. The Laundress by Tann were the same as those Milner described in his specie-
has reported the Starch to be of very superior quality, and the cation. They were to look on all the evidence on either side
Lady Mayoress will have much pleasure in recommending it.— bearing on these issues ; and if they thought that, although the
Mansion House, 31st July, 1849." boxes that the defendant sold did not contain any pipes, tubes,
Sold Wholesale, in London, by Messrs, Pantin and Turner; or artificial vessels for containing the liquid, they contained.
Hooper Brothers; Batty and Feast ; Henry Stern, and Co- ; alum and other substances from which moisture was to be ex-
John Hynam ; Croft and Innocent ; Petty, Wood, and Co. ; tracted by heat; if they thought they were substantially the
Twelvetrees Brothers; Chas. C. R. "Williams and co., Fining i same as Milner's, they would find that issue for the plaintiff;
Manufacturers, 29, Hope-street, Hackney-road; John Yates ; and if they thought they were not the same as Milner's, for the
and Co. ; Yates, Walton, and Turner ' • William Clayton and 1 defendant. They were at liberty to find that issue for the
Co. ; Field, Roberts, and Barber ; A- Braden and Cu. ; ' plaintiff, although the defendant did not use any pipes, tubes,
Thomas Snelling ; John Brewer ; and It. Wakefield, 35, 1 or artificial vessels. If they thought the process was substan-
Crown-street ail, by all Shopkeepers. 1
they would
the same as that mentioned in the plaintiff's specification,
AGENTS WANTED; apply to Mr. R. Wotherspoon, 40, , they would And that issue for the plaintiff. They must bear in
Dunlep-street, Glasgow. ! mind that the plaintiff said, " I claim as my invention the in-
Sold in Packages at Id., 2d., 4d., and Bd. each, by nearly all ' troduction or application of the combined effect in chambered
the respectable Shopkeepers in the United Kingdom. The boxes, or depositories of the moisture and material kept humid
Trade supplied in Liverpool by the Liverpool Apothecaries' in the apace surrounding the innermost box, and its contents,
Company, J. P. Turton, and Messrs. Evans, Sons, and Co., and without in any way being confined to the material or liquid
isSeoor
al, dps, , 1
NN
GVI
al
ri
neo
aul etf saGric 1
et euo arr
egn
rel. IR,
RI
aeact
nae
ell,
;11,a
J.
by
B.t
sh. t erHefollowingh partieshuaanAd
il
rboxes, safes, or other depositories enclosing papers, or other
land-road ;J. M•Whan, Chandler, 161, London-road ; William materials, from ire." It was on the construction of these
Ireland, Chandler, Great Charlotte-street; W. Harrison, Chan-
el et:s—ol6nP3,: Hare,
Scot- arranged, in order to produce the desired effect of protecting
employed,
words that he had directed them in point of law, that the tie-
dler, H. , fondant may have infringed the patent,
although he did not
41, Byrom-street; B. and Thomson, make use of tubes, or pipes, or artificial veneer. With this
found that it was so, damages not
Wm. Naughton, Chandler, Birken-
iifsatmheoyf forty shillings would be sneicients
head; P. Bates, Chandler, 192, Mill-street ; Hugh Tool, Chan-
Cjohlnn d3j3loe,nrFseo,sx,w-Cshitiirateeneedthi;aerpeß, .1B; Banister, Chandler, 118, London-road •
beinge‘ xfringedcepti exception,
ei
shppeau patent;
dler, 92, Mill-street ; S. B. Walcote, Tea Dealer, 2, Great Nel-
son-street ; John Dear, Tea Dealer. 18, Islington ;eee,aftto? for them 'to say if the defendant had is..
E. W. Boote, but they were to consider, themselves, which, way they would
Tea Dealer, 53, Brownlow-hill; Jos. Hartley and Co., Tea find their verdict.
traeendt ;186,, .•: i• .-, -- .
Mill-street;lendinning George
lorgWe
Byrd,ilson
Dealers ;S. and J. Goodacre, Tea Dealers, Old Haymarket ;J. The Jury, after a short delitieritfoa, iii4dthey folio their
Pollock, Tea Dealer, Monk-street, Birkenhead ; Gilbert Bro- verdict npon all the issues for the plaintiff.-
.. ,
thers, Tea Importers, James-buildings, 32, Lime-street; R. •IRDICT FOIL ftIItILPIAIXTIMP.
torts: so
is this verdict, establishing the validity of Wow/ pa.
Druggists,so fully cord:wed by htslionour the Itice-Channeller's
Druggist.' St. James-place; Wm. Chandler, Fox- decision, farther praceedingCtllChaaCerr are betas suss,"
amen-street,
street; Cornelius Callaghan, Chandler, 24, Harrison,'llighfield-street ; • against all parties faillosp, EW4ffig,.f. raft ma. sea fir
S. Gregson, 71, Spear-street, Manclvester. Isms. '
Wingate, D9r,ti
jgagmi ste,s