Star.
London, England, 1823-10-31 00:00:00

lt.dar INTELLIGENCE.

• •
COURT OF KING'S BENCH, OCTOBER 3
LIBEL ON HIS MAJESTY.
THD KING V. D. W. HARVEY AND ANOTHER.
This criminal information, against The Sunday Times,
for a libel on his Majesty, being fixed for trial this
morning, before a Special Jury, the Court in the Guild-
ball of the City of London, was opened at an unusually
early hour. By nine o'clock the most prominent places
were taken. Mr. MAULS, the Treasury Solicitor, and
the Stamp Office Solicitor, &c. tank their places at the
table : and soon afterwards Mr. D. %V. Harvey entered
the Court, and took his seat among the Counsel, on the
row behind the bar. Mr. Harvey, it may be remem-
bered, is a Student within the bar ; while in Parlia-
ment, as Member for Colchester, he completed his
CI terms:" but on application to the Benchers of Lin-
coln's Inn, of which Society he entered as a Student, t(?
be di called," his request was not complied with. The
LORD MAYOR, the Lady Mayoress, &c. were on the
Bench, also Baron de STARE. and Lord NUGENT.

The names of the Special Jurymen were called over,
and the following Gentlemen answered :
J. N. Manson W. Allwright
B. Stokes D. Barnwell
R. Sharpe A. Ballemanno
J. Cecil (all Merchants).
Seven Gentlemen appearing on the Special Jury, the
Attorney-General prayed a taks, and the following
Common Jurymen answered to their mimes : •

James Carpenter T. &tailpiece
O. W. Crok and
B. W. Jackson John Hai.
These 12 having been sworn, Mr. SHEPHERD, jun.
opened the case, and
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL addressed the Jury, stating,
that in the discharge of his public duty he had deemed
it right to institute this proceeding. When they came
to hear the libel, they would agree with him that it was
not written in the fair pursuit of public discussion, the
proper and seemly investigation of public measures and
the acts of public men. This libel was of no such cha-
racter. It insinuated, or rather directly stated, that
early in the present year his Majesty was afflicted with
mental derangement. The mischievous character of such
publication would be obvious to all. They would re-
collect that his Majesty was indisposed early in the pre-
sent year ; and at that period the publication appeared
in the shape, not of a paragraph, but as the leading
article, in The Sunday Times. It stated, that the King's
sickness was of an " alarming" nature; that it would
be some time before his Majesty's " seat" of complaint
would enable the Physicians to declare the Royal Pa-
tient in a state of convalescence; and that, let others
say what they pleased, the writer deemed it to be his
ditty to express the fear that his Majesty's complaint
was " hereditary." Those particular words were printed
in Italics, and their meaning could not be doubtful. The
Learned Gentleman then read the whole if the libel,
as set forth in the following count of the indictment
'66 TIM KING (meaning our said Lord the King).—At,
Cached as we sincerely and lawfully are to every interest
connected with the Sovereign (meaning our said Lord
the King), or any of his illustrious relatives, it is with
the deepest concern that we have to state that the ma-
lady under which his Majesty (meaning our said Lord,
the now King), labours, is of an alarming description.
It is from authority we speak, when with sorrow we in-
forin our Readers (as we think it our duty to do), that
the King (meaning our said Lord the King), not only
still continues to be confined to his chamber, but that
the symptoms of his disorder are of too serious a na-
ture to admit of his medical attendants being able to
say when their Royal Patient (meaning our said Lord
the King), will be sufficiently recovered to chew him-
self to his anxious and afflicted subjects. Dr. Knighton,
his Majesty's (meaning our said Lord the King's)' Pri-
vate Secretary, and Domestic Physician, is in constant
attendance, scarcely ever out of the chamber in which
the King (meaning our said Lord the King) is confine&
and never farther from the scene of sickness than the

adjoining room. The persons about his Majesty
(meaning our said Lord the King) foreseeing chat
too probably it will be a considerable time before the
seat of his complaint will be in a state sufficiently con-
valescent to render it advisable that he should quit the
Pavilion, have, in order to ease the apprehensions of
the Public, circulated the report that pleasure and
comfort, not any afflicting necessity, will induce a pro-
tracted stay at Brighton. But far from approving this
deceptions kind of policy, which only ensures a more
violent shock, whenever the real truth of the case shall
appear, we deem it much the wiser way to use on such
unhappy occasions the language of fact and reality;
therefore we are as desirous of communicating, as others
are of concealing, the melancholy truth that the King's
(meaning our said Lord the King's) disorder is, it is
feared, of an hereditary description—that his Majesty
(meaning our said Lord' the King), has had too many
misfortunes preying upon his benevolent mind—the loss
of a daughter and a consort equally dear to him, and
of a royal brother, whose political principles he loved;
besides the excruciating sufferings of his agricultural
subjects, so sincerely deplored in his late most gracious
speech; and the danger in which the liberty of the
Spaniards is placed by Bourbon pride and Gothic fr.
rocky; that these and other weighty concerns have op-
pressed his paternal feelings, and borne bard on his su-
perior intellects, we have too much reason to fear. Bat
if Divius PXOVLDENCI has ordained that mental afflic-
tions shall be no less transmissible than the virtues of
the heart, and the best of Princes (meaning our said
Lord the.Kir.g), should, by their long protraction, or
the reiterated returns of his present unfortunate morbo-
.
sky, furnish another example of the lamentable tact
(which Heaven in its-goodness avert), still one resource
will remain to his Najesty (meaning our said Lord the
King), the prayers of a dutiful, loving, and loyal people;
aid seldom--very seldom—has Heaven been deaf to the
orisons of nations offered in behalf of wise and gracious
Kings." That the libel insinuated mental insanity against
the individual on the Throne, he thought the Jury could
not for a moment doubt; and was it not calculated to
.rodoce most Mischievous effects on the public mind?
It was not public discussion; it was not the investiga
tion of public measures; it declared neither more nor
less, than that his Majesty—he who swayed the Sceptre
and was the Chief Executive in the country, was in a
state of insanity, and therefore incapable of fulfilling
the duties of his high station, and of managing those
affairs connected with his Kingly authority. Was not
that a grossr malicious, and cruel libel? It said that the
King was incapable f managing his own affairs. If
that were said of a private individual, would not that
be a libel ? They would immediately pronounce that it
would be a libel of the most malicious character; and
was it to be said, that the King was to be libelled so
seriously with impunity, while a like libel on a private

indi►idual would be •isited with the most serious e.
nalties? Was the King, on so delicate a point, to be
libelled with impunity ? That was the question for
the Jury. He had no doubt about the result. It was
a mischievous, malicious, and cruel libel; it wis calcu.

lated to produce the most serious effects on the public
mind ; and it had been put forward in the most pro-
minent and glaring manner. He repeated, the question
for the Jury was, might the King be libelled with im-
punity, when no man would dare to libel, in a similar
manner, a private individual? That was not reason ;
it was not law ; it was not justice ; and he felt full re-
liance that the Jury would declare it to be, what it
really was, a malicious libel on the Sovereign of these
realms. He would leave the case in their hands; he
was quite sure that they would do their duty on th
present occasion. He considered that in filing, by virtue
of his office, a criminal information, he had only per-
formed his duty ; and he was sure the Jury would not
forget their duty to the King, and the Constitution of
the country.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL proceeded to call witnesses.
Elijah Litchfield stated, he was Clerk to the Solicitor
of the Treasury Office. Witness put in the affidavit
made by Mr. Harvey, stating that he was the Proprietor
of The Sunday 2 lines, which was countersigned by Mr.
Bouverie, one of the Commissioners.
Mr. Litchfield being again called, said, the affidavit
7 was signed on the 27th January.—The libel and affida-
vit were read, which closed the case for the prosecution.
The Commom SERJEANT then addressed the Jury for
the defendant Chapman. He was astonished, and la-
mented, that the Attorney-General, in the discharge of

his official duty, should fix upon this as a fit subject for
public prosecution, for he was not to be told that the.
right of public discussion was irrelevant to this ques-
tion. As to the mode in which it was put forward, too,
he was not unwilling to meet the Attorney-General: he
complained that it was headed " Earliest Intelligence,"
but was such a subject to be put into a corner, fitted for
the perusal of the lowest classes only? He did not de-
spair of shewing that there was no subject more fit for
public discussion, and which could have been put for-
ward more properly than this. His client was the pub-
lisher, who, let it be remembered, was not so guilty,
if guilt there was at all, as the proprietor, who had
the whole controul of the concern. Mr. Harvey was

a man of good education, well known, and would be
more ably defended than he could be by him. The
printer was a mere machine, for putting into a state
of publication matter, of the import of which, possibly,
be might be totally ignorant. It would therefore follow,
that although the proprietor might be guilty, still the
printer might be innocent. Indeed, he could not see why
this man was at all indicted ; the whole case could have
been brought into discussion by a prosecution of Mr.
Harvey alone. The agitation of the question now was
calculated to do more mischief than if the report had
been suffereJ to lie in the state of oblivion in which it
bad lain for so long a time. Many months had elapsed
since this report was first circulated, which now, thank
Goa, there was no reason for—the prayers of his Majes-
ty's subjects had been heard. But however little founda-
tion there was now for such a report, there was no doubt
but at one time such a report was in circulation; and could
it be said that these reports were not fit for discussion ?
But were any of the facts untrue? Was it untrue that
Dr. Knighton was in attendance upon him ; were any
of the other facts untrue which were then stated ? The
only crime, therefore, was in the inference, which was in
some degree warranted by the experience of the former
reign. But then came the Attorney-General to com-
plain of the wound inflicted upon the King's feelings—
his feelings—when did his Majesty hear of the Sunday
iimes? Be it remembered that this was only the seven-
teenth number of this little-known Paper. Reports did
prevail that the King laboured under this dreadful
malady—and the Journalist takes it as a matter deeply
interesting to the Public. But the report "prcves hap-
- pily to be untrue; and what possible injury could a re-
port in so obscure a Journal make in the public mind ?
He contended that the Attorney-General, with all his
vehemence, and all his labour, had been fighting a
" sham fight." The words "by authority" would be
made much of; but what did they mean more, in a
public Newspaper, than that the Journaliit proceeded
on the authority of some respectable individual. No-
thing more was meant; it was not meant to say, that
there was the authority of a Minister of State, or of
she Physicians, Sir William Knighton, &c. There
were some such rumours abroad, and it was the
duty of a Journalist to allude to them, It was said
that the libel was calculated to bring the King into
hatred and contempt; but quite the reverse was
the fact. But was it a slander of the King to allude
to his "benevolent" mind ? All admitted the benevolent
character of his Majesty's mind ; yet according to the
King's friends, it was slander, it was sneer, it was libel,
to mention his Majesty's " benevolent" mind. And the
loss of a daughter, she v, ho was to continue the Royal
Succession in a direct line, was it .a libel to say that the
King was afflicted with that excellent Lady's loss ?
Next it was said to be sneer and libel to represent the
King as afflicted with the career of the proud Bourbons
in Spanish affairs—with that contest in which this
country must ultimately be involved, only under disad-
vantageous circumstances. Was it to libel the King to
say that he was afflicted by that momentous transaction
which deeply interested all his subjects? Surely it
was a most extraordinary way to shew regard and friend-
ship for the King's character, thus to contend that it
was a libel and sneer to• allude to his undoubtedly bene-
volent mind, and to those unquestionable talents which,'
particularly in his early years, made him collect around
his Court some of the ablest men of the age. In conclu-
sion, the Learned Gentleman lamented, that when the
public mind was completely tranquil on the painful to-
pics which formed the subject of the article complained
of in the newspaper ; when all these various rumours
which his Majesty's illness had unfortunately given rise
to, had subsided, it should have been deemed a judi-
cious discharge of duty to institute the present criminal
proceeding. Within a week of the publication, in Fe-
bruary last, the Attorney-General, in the exercise of his
sound discretion, filed the Criminal Information ; had
he paused a " little fortnight," he much questioned
whether the Learned Gentleman would not have been
dissuaded from m adopting the proceeding.
Mr. BROUGHAM followed, and addressed the Jury at
great length. Having expressed the hope that he should
not weaken what had been said by his Learned Friend,
he adverted to some of the events of the late reign, the
late King's illness in 1789, and the non-appointment of
a Regency, and the great delicacy el' the subject, should
than be indisposition of the King. He proceeded to
comment on the libel, and the Attorney-General's
speech. He expressed his astonishment that dip prosecu-

1 ~ ~'

Hon should have been commenced. but he was still morel
surprises!! at the course of the Attorney-General's speech.
According to the prosecution and to the said speech, it
was a libel and sneer to suppose that the King was si-
Milarly affected, in common with his subjects, on those
topics which concerned the whOle nation. Seventeen
Millions of people were to be afflicted by the most mo-
mentous events, but the King was not to be agitated by
them. To say that the King was agitated by. them was
to be denounced as libel and sneer. He must protest
against the liberty and property of any man being put
in jeopardy by such fanciful constructions of language
as those which w ere attempted to be established by
the Attorney-General and his ex-officio information.—
Nk. Harvey was the proprietor of the paper; he was
known in that Court legally and as nothing more; he
teas not charged to be the author of the article; how-
ever, Mr. Harvey's politics were well known, in that
place as well as elsewhere. But the Jury had to look at
Mr. Harvey as the proprietor of the Paper only. The
article asserted the King to have been afflicted at the
loss of his Royal Consort. He ( Mr. Brougham) believed
that his Majesty was much affected by that event; to
believe the contrary was to suppose that the King had
not the ordinary feelings of our nature. After all that
happened, after all the persecutions to which that illus-
tricatsLatly had been exposed—persecutions, about the
ii-lVtt of' Which there were persons in that place Who
kVA, More it* he did—it was inspoisible not to believe
the reprisentatiim Of 'Lord Londonderry, that the news
of.soch an event had filled his Majesty with sincere
grief. The Jury, in ermsidering the article charged to
be a libel, would examine the whole of it; they would
not allow their minds to be diverted towards any par.
ticular patagraphs, separated from the general context,
by any efforts made by.the•Law Officers of the Crown.
was glad to address a Jury in any part of England,
but more particularly in the famous City of London,
the Cradle of the Liberties of the Country ; and he felt
assiired that the present Jury would shew themselves
worthy of their illOstrious ancestors.

The Arronumr-Gatmaat. rose to reply. He be-
limbed Mr. Harvey to be the author, and us such he
charged the individual With the publication. Till Mr.
Harvey's article appeared, it was admitted that Ahere
Were only rumours : they were acknowledged to be such,
and rumours which there was a desire to conceal : but
in this article they were proclaimed to be fact, and such
declaration professed to be made on authority. Only
a few days before the publication of this libel the Par-
liament had been opened with a Speech from the
King; yet, at such a time, this man had the impudence
tOdeblare.that the Ministers were base enough to carry
on theGovensinent at a time when the King, from men-
tatcleigngement, was incapable of attending to the du.
tiei Of the Kingly Mice. Let the Jury recollect, that the
i'aper-did not allude in the rumours as inch, but the
Paficr, after noticing them, deilared the-rumoured :nets.
val-deiangement to be Fact. If that were-to be endured,
if thee Jtmk might be so Welled with impunity, he
trusted-that it would not be adduced as proof of the
44 Liberty!' of die-Press. The distinction endeavoured
to be set up between the Printer and Proprietor was
weak, and unworthy of answer ; those who pocketed the
profus were not to escape with saying that they were
tot the authors of the libel. If the Jury were of opi-
nion that the public mind ought not to be disturbed by
such false and scandalous rumours and statemems,tbey
would return a verdict of guilty.
The Lord Chief Justice ABBOTT, in addressing the
-Jury, detailed the nature of the case. According to the
law of the land, the printers and publishers, as well as
the proprietors, were liable for the contents in their
Avers. As to the matter that was charged to be libel,
he had no hesitation whatever in distinctly asserting
that if it were falsely stated of the King—or of any
subject in the realm.--that he was allicted with mental
insanity, the party publishing such statement would be
acting criminally. On this point be bad no doubt. The
question then was, had the Paper in.question promul-
gated such a statement regarding his Majesty ? and that
eras the question of fact which the law very properly
left,to the Jury. But he would observe, if it were a
libel to make any such statement falsely against a pri-
vate iedividual, that-it was a still greater libel to pub-
lish such a statement against the highest executive au-
cheeky in the country. In cases oflibel, in particular, it
seas the-custom of the Judge to:ezpress to the Jury his
opinion of -the publication. He had ever done so siege
he was adlidge—heviduld do So now; and he theti-fore
had no hesitation iii declaring his opinion to:be that the
pithlication was-a criminal libel.
The ;Tart. after a very sisorf consultation among each
other in the -box, retired, at a quarter past one o clock,
to consider of their verdict.

TbeJory returned into Court at twenty-five minutes
past three O'clock ; and, after their names had been called
enter, the Foreman said, they were desirous of knowing
whe;her it was necessary to presume a malicious listen.
lion en the part of the defendants in finding them guilty
of,publiAing the libel ?
The Loin Curer Jusuce said, a man who publishes
slanderous matter to villty another must be presumed to
do that. maliciously, which is the object of the publica•
lion, unless he can chew the contrary. These niay be
iiaocent publications—for instance, the debeery of al
book to a Magistrate, to bring it under his observatiou
oi—it min may bay:. a good intention, but if be publishes
a malicious libel, malice is to be presumed, unless it be
',hewn to the contrary.
The Jury then withdrew, and were locked up again
until nearly six o'clock, when they came once more into
Court, and pronounced both the defendants Guili* The
'Verdict was attended by a recommendation to mercy..
BLASPHEMOUS LIBELe-THE KING B. TRUST.

The defendant, a Teri lotting man, who kept a shop
at the corner of Giltsyrur-street, in Newgate-street, for
the Me of Cat publicatiatis, *ns htirged •apen in-
fortnOtion, filed by his 114esty's AttOrtiey-General,with
pMslishing *blasphemous kitel, namely, Peitner's Prin.
ciplit of Nalifre, ith intent n bring the Holy rsospei
and the Christian Religion i.ntY) COn*tiips. Itappeared
fro the *Video& that too tisStitre Olfileds detected the
defendant Pif tl* sale ot• the beet., and' Paved the pobli-
e alio*. It sake 'appeared its evidence that' id altop was
a naisitneo; Aeratrtdii
trnwtt of ipttioisk; atfd initt‘h dodarigtiad the lists of he
passengers. Tbepasish beadle isn one oteatiot Nisei
'nght 4,1 the of noftout placaDts, and carr,ifd, thf apse
"rd, " 4:ttf9441, ,•14F1

libel, which the Lord Chief Justice wobld noj allow him,
the Jitry2 withont the jeti.st Hesitation found him Guilty.
The LORD CM!? • Jvwe* tilai; laid.
eg There cannot be a Moi-e couihatisii:Ohof of the mis-
chievous tendency of these publications, than the-effect
produced on the Mind of this unfortunate young Isiah."
saanw=ahl • . . .
• SCOTCH AND COCKNEY LATIN.
FROM THL LONDON .MAAASISR
Mn. EDITOR—My much nom:lW fxbond andIONSW
pondent, Archibald Saunders, •rst the good tows •,di
Edinburgh, writer, when be last did us the hosovrbf a
visit to our poor Metropolis, was pleased to make himil
self soberly merry at the expense of certain modes of
pronunciation, which he contended to be peculiar to us I
Londoners. It is no secret, I fear, to our fellow-Cortn-
trymen of the northern part of this island, that in. all'
the streets, lanes, courts, alleys, &c. to the east of Tem-
ple Bar, we exchange reciprocally the V and the W,
and insert or omit the H—in a manner directly at vio-
lence with that of our politer provincial brethren. My
friend Archy was particularly amused with the way of
reading Latin, as it is in use at our ?üblic grammar
schools—at St. Paul's, and Merchant '1 aylors . I took
him to an annual recital day at the latter, and I thought
he would have burst his sides at hearing a tall upper
boy gravely opening the ./Eneid, with
Hums maintops CANCP.-•
and another distorting Horace, With his
• . Putus
Wittatictionus—

instead of aaalifA, and VAARGEENIanS, according to
the correcter pronunciation of the models of just speak-
:
ing at Edinburgh and Glasgow. I was in some pain, I
cunfess, to have our young scholars (in one of whom I
claim an interest, being both his cousin-german and
guardian) thus caught tripping by so great a master of
universal knowledge, as I have always esteemed my
friend Archy to be; and, in this difficulty, I applied to
my old master, Dr. Parr, whom, as born in a middle
county, I thought most likely to be exempt from pro.
judkes, inseparable perhaps from a native of either of
the -two great, yet distant, Metropolises of this country.
He was pleased to say, that with regard to the change
of V in vutornraus to W, there was at least an equal
chance for the Merchant Taylors' bay being in the right,
for the Romans baring no character by which to ex-
press the latter, and it being.neat to impossible but they
must have had the sound, it was almost demonstrable
that their kat* V served for either at pleasure; and,
certainly, ftir the sake of euphony, mammy:ls did to
his ear seem more fluent, mellifluous, and feminine (and
therefore more .Horatian) than the other *era" of- it,
which had something in it:repulsively WA end Biotwal.
But for the aspirate before mom, ebe was aleariref
'opinion that it was no more •shin wascoyery of the
true old Roman prottuneiadon, whin -•kottle was
I mistress ofAhe .writld. To convince me of this, he
I pointed outft,Upistam in•Catulluv, made by the -poet,
upon his feiondA. Atria:, when that Patrician went as
errs-feet into. Syria; in which, under covert of rallying
his friend, bya very happy irony be exposes the mis-
coostriiction which those
°barbarous provincielists would
make of their Governor's Latin, when he came among
theta. '1 suppose that he meant to insinuate that
theseGoledonituis of the Foot spoke purer Latin than a
&elm ,Ifibletaan,wookt boa pasposterous perversion,
and qnhe destroy the delicacy. of, the concealed -compli-
ment. It is as follows
Coasurbus &dot, at smack cesososs. vellet
Dime; et sunsuisss Antes, isareses.
Credo sic taster, sic fiber avuueules qius,
4le Bata 'were disesat, false atia.
Irtitt iiitilif 'waist se ease loeunan, •
Vaiptilin_ riegfat drama oilitsokas.
11°"iimo'bi parmah riluiScant Sainibuoialef;
4,4lbeigg.
asaTet evetlter 46.1esiter..
' teac At pm* ' 'cilia verbi ;
' tali sdisfed* .et ' thativit=t,
• Issued Judas, pestittissAaste 'Asti .
Jail ash lastortair, setillsouses.
Ilia plain that not may this Nobloinati himself, but
his aaatbor, aunts, uncles, great ausimacc. on both sides,
had been ;sad all their lives to pronounce—not ItaSIDIAII
as it is erroneously spoken in all Aodeanies west of
4binplodmr—Aut in the true dialect of imperial
—the Roatano-Casknaian of that day HINaIDIML lit:
therm:pre we-learn, that in the right spirit of . a Roman
anfeet, he wasonxious for ;Japans the.gcnoine Latin,
as spoken by men of highest biith et Rome, .is those
distant colonies and free cities. llot anneal with-ins.
porting avooeg them the initial Winn% he seem. to
hash: insisted upon it by marking pil Wnetlatbeginsiot
to the eye with a vowel) with that !rough iiiiiiiottila
in she moat emphatic mennerfoonabie—leMakeit palvit
—that is to say, with all his *might and main be tad
iligalatAl. The ignorant alarm taken by those bathe-
Sian: atthis. elegant innovation is ridiculous eroughs..
They were afraidof •loting &heir Inman sea~thesr o&4
INerfpshuats—and,buitsg a iiloatAii onatirapoiedepoit
them instead—as if an *spires* *QM or -leas• cook!
change 41* value (if their conunemeial. wstots—or its if
the Primrose Hill of flingers Mid Lothian eonld 4otie
anything in height or abetiptneas lay nailing; it, by. what
I am convinced is its proper moo ia,purest anglisis--
klarthar's Seat,
Referring these conitieleaetiosi to the alaaters:oft.se.
nunciation at Edhibaegit and inLoncion, andleithisign
ccooferenCala be held tit Yeakor.itlawark, by ceildows•,
aeons, to he appOinted hy eithlw de, cams, to vat*
tbe,purity of our common•languago, and fix the pronna- I
claim an particular upon a unlforas:baeie,
, 1 reakaha ”Or: .
• • • .
• ' PHIL, 4 411 .!4119g124AP!... :
la
P, gi,.... Die graeace in , qtft
ti*Notoc figsbrinOusly coil Tif ty.lik 014teLTO
up; „to 1 `.v11.41e1...t11e Pij 111 14e r.grt was 416
m, . e;li as in :;?tclititkp Ltd not.:foisiski.. !II
it lqibtkisi era sto Some nieetilis 'be ancient R
020e0arain statue, to die iolutibtrer ethic:lithe re:1113
erithoiryriileariung is altetether incompetent.
• L. . .
RAtC's TttitAviii,:ilie Opera' House, andci. tii
pe7A, ;i.fitmpedt F.:19 4 deffPrated with 11.0 ePt ei*JP"
wur- • t.Pp, Ithii interior' will be itgolt
nie4eilt 4l " the . . ifi. i•ill 'Haute nett' . holing;
*Pf;ifit le, lif...aeO!*!Pi.s°T the arena 4.10-lio,i • .
4._4114., And *pis assistapte„. e lobbies 144.4itripw,41,
have upd!ilorie CORR4IOe: iinprojittosemq.: SW*
ffeitew is ow the Goticitilvcogeltagles his
egeot.b, apo, riertio te. :...... IL:- _ !A'
rfAI Fi!i," it 4119 -.4.
i,trOtitd aillK!* .9fatit,
I. 44rgat tom,,
i:. • wactelive be 1041N3'
i
. • • . .. .
;P .!. ,Plliirei.M t'
1. ,:, .- - hsv ;urine.chl

j
„It .
.1.
I
7
.t.
j
• r '
I • '4
wi
tf Its •
1 41
,•
tF
1,1,
I
ii
1
►
14
I
t►
r.
•.

`'77:7!`-7"-- r.-y". ~ mfg. aar" L 46 151.►1%
Qo khe, (I..reco-Yard. 14e 4ta*GlAtit prc.ffxscil. a -..chAre Cerd #psala
of felooi, and 44q01a4 A0E444%14 DdaBll' :aYsitl
proclaimed hi4s,olt Ole supporter of it*. icsaiiewatit .*44:
01,13.14 `YAs. Pot.nli4C out.. Yt•lF'9.;4rfr of
Auer. We caws of 4,lllpukiacAa.so9 144 bfeg 1.44t0w5,. 4114
01. e ifeleti44l read 114:4efe..1.1tte• "ot-
he told_ the J'ary. 4aa Tim a c4llbgaii, !apt,. 5, brit efateat„r roc
oea.g.fil to be uric,-MtPr.egslW.ctutin to, inVugn the, aulltilarSt *PI
tetiiioia;biatienipting to read the whole Ora' ' rive alit ;wiltii:g; a
1
, .
, •
• • • ,
• • •
*. •