Star.
London, England, 1825-09-16 00:00:00

OLD BAILEY SESSIONS.

TRIAL OF WILLIAM CHRISTMAS.

William Christmas, aged 29, by profession a clerk,
was put to the bar, on an indictment charging him -with
embezzling, in the city of Llndon. ten Exchequer bills,
value 1001. e.!ch, the property of Henry Merrick Hoare
and others, his employers. There was also a (feta:tier
lodged against him for embezzling a Bank note, value
301. the property of Henry Merrick Hoare and others,
his painters, on the 22d day of September last, at the
parish of St. Dunstan in the West.
The prisoner, who was very genteelly dressed, entered
the Court, accompanied by a professional Gentleman.
He held in his hand a bundle of papers, and pleaded
" Not Guilty" in rather a faltering tune.
Mr. LAM opened the case for the prosecution.
Mr. Serjeant BOSAWQMIT stated the case to the Jury, and called
the following Witnesses :
Mr. Henry Merrick Hoare examined from the Bench
—I am one of the partners in the house of Messrs.
Hoate. They consist of Henry Hoare, Charles Hoare,
Hugh Hoare, and Henry Merrick Hoare. The prisoner
was intrusted as clerk to receive sums of money. It was
his business to c.irry the Exchequer-bills to the office,
for the purpose of their being exchanged. A notice was
sent from the office, and he then made out a list, which
he to k with the bills to the Exchequer-office. The
bills in question were accordingly made out in September
last. He left the employment io June last.
By Mr. BRODRICK—The bills were deposited at the
Bank for security, and the partners had no right to use
them. The prisoner had Len in the house many years,
and bore an excellent character. He came when sent for.
By Mr. Law—The house has the power of exchanging the old
for new bills, as they are paid off
Mr. Hugh Richard Hoare examined—l am the ne-
phew of the last witness. In September last I looked
out the Exchequer bills, for the prisoner, to take them
to the Exchequer. I did not take any account of them,
as that was the prisoner's duty.
By the RecOnisza—l had no list ; I looked out all
the notes of September 22.* I merely handed the Ex-
chequer-bills to the prisoner of that date. Many of
them had been deposited in the house by the customers.
Mr. Holmes Snelgar examined by Mr. Law—l am
an officer employed in the Audit-office, Somerset-house.
I piodnce a list of Exchequer-bills transmitted to our
office from Messrs. Hoare. The amount of the two
lists is 475400/4 the lists specify the number and date
of the bills. The manner in which a demand for new
bills and interest was made, was by the person whose
hands'', i:ing appeared at the bottom of the list signing
a receipt ; the words were, " Received, the 22d of Sep-
tember, the bills as specified within, with interest."
Mr. Merrick Hoare again examined—The list of the aid as well
as the new bills is in the handwriting of the prisoner.
John Henry Latham examined by Mr. Serjeant
Bosaisquer.—ln the payment of Exchequer Bills, be
paid off a number in September, to the prisoner. He
gave him new for old ones. The amount of the prin-
cipal was 475,4001. of the interest 14,2621. For which
the prisoner received 365 bills for 10001. each; 129
5001. each ; 116 2001. each ; and 227 for 1001. each.
Witness did not compare the Exchequer Bills with any
account, bit he had every reason to believe them to be
the same. He gave the prisoner all that he demanded.
The book now produced is one in which all new bills
are copied. It contains an account of all the bills issued,
and to whom. It also contains an account of those dos
livered to the prisoner on the 2241 of September last, for
Messrs. 11-" are and Co.
The amount was here handed in.
The same denomination of notes were delivered for
the old ones that were sent in. Tie prisoner was satisfied
with the amount, he had received. Witness would not
give six fivehundred pounds Exchequer-bills for three for
1,0001. ptecisely the same description would be given.
Mr. Wm. Wood sworn.—Was the Paymaster of his
Majesty's forces in September last. A paper now pro.
duced was not in witness's hand-writing. It was copied
horn the orieinal thought. Witness examined it at the
time. Thinks he has seen the prisoner. Never paid
him any money on his own authority. Never pays with•
out the proper vouchers, consisting of draughts and
affidavits. I paid him by draughts on the Bank. Pen-
siuni *ere in course of payment in September last, and
remain so up to the present time.
Mr. Henry Whiting stated that he was in the service
of the Bank of England—in the public drawing office.
I hare a check in my own hand-writing, ordering the
p4yo.cnt of 14,2951. 6s. Bd. by Mr. Hetherington to the
pri.oner. There was another draught connected with
tl.e above for the payment of 3:;1. 6s. Bd. The order
st as not made particularly to Mr. Hetheiington, to
ul.om the prisoner presented it, and received the Money.
I did not see the money paid ; I never knew, ,luring the
thirty years I have been in the oflic•., b,ut two instances
in which the draughts have not hs.en signed ; I cannot
with certainty say that he paid the draught over to the
prisoner, but front all the circumstances I believe so.
William Hethingham, one of the pay clerks at the
Bar.k, said a pay note was presented to him for pay-
-nt, .d by Mr. Hetherington, and he handed over

mem, signs, y
the money ; knew prisoner by the name of Christrne.
Mr. its -oduced a bodc, in which al

Ito,beit Cottle pr._ .10
entry of Exchequer bills, to the anbouni Of 574,400/.
bad been made in the hand-writing of the prisoner,
being 1,0001. short. Miss Wood's account bad been
'narked as paid oft to 1824, bui no new bill WAS vatted
to het account. The u►terest on that bill could be ttei,

'The prisoner ought' tit has* brbbg& die interest chick
and Exchequer bills to Mitiri. Hoares,, but be had
not done so.
In his cross-examination he admitted that he
written to two of the public.prints; announcing that' a
public examination of the prisoner was-tb take place in
the evening at Bow-street. if the money had been paid
to Mi.s Woods, it would have appeared in the book.
Mr. George M-lrose.-IVitness had examined the
Account of the bills, and found the old and new to tally,
w.th the exception of ten for 1001. each, which ice
wanting.
Mr. John Turner Watts, a bill-broker, sta:ed Olathe
had sold for the pris ,ner 1001. bills to the numb:'r
of ten. On the 22d of June be sold, three; on the 25th
of June three wore; and on the 14th ofJuly four more.
He understood the prisoner acted as an agent for
other persons.
Mr. Melrose was again called, and swot.: that there
was an entry of 1,365/. 6s. Bd. in which there ought to
have been an entry of three Exchequer Bills for 301. but
in which there was only two entered.

had I

The case closed for the prosecution.
Mr. ADOLPHVS and Mr. BRODRICK contended that
no case had been made out. There might be vague
surmises that the ten documents might have come to
the possession of the prisoner; but there was no proof I
of the fact, and, wanting this, there was not evidence to
go to the Jury.
Mr. Serjeant BOSANQUET contended that it was
clearly proved that the prisoner had received the iden-
tical bills which were wanting. The Learned Genile-
turn went through a numerical statement of the ac-
coutiOss and contended that the indictment was made out.
The RECORDER said, with respect to the 301. Barak • ,
notes, he was of opinion there was not evidence; but
with respect to the 1001. Exchequer bills, he was of
opinion there was evidence to go to the Jury.
The prisoner was now called on for his defence. He
read from a written paper a most forcible appeal, al-
loding to the conduct of his past life. It had gone
abroad that his difficulties had been occasioned by his
connexion with a certain Lady, and that he had been by
her led into extravagance. This was a most cruel and
heart-rending aspersion. His expenses had not ex-
ceeded more than 30s. per week, and his tailor's bill was
beneath 201. per annum. He read several letters, sent
him by Mr. Henry Hoare, and other highly respectable
personages. He solemnly denied that there was the
slightest particle of truth in the cruel story circulated of
him, and called GOD to witness that the Lady alluded to
was wholly blameless. He trusted that the Gentlemen
who attended for the public press would do him this
act of justice; and concluded by imploring the Jury to
carefully ex.smine into the case—trusting they would,
by their verdict, again restore him to society.
Mr. Hoare gave the prisoner a very excellent character up to
the present time.
The Itwoanita summed up the evidence to the Jury, and mi-
' nutely dwelt on the peculiar circumstances that characterized the

present ease.
At a quarter after twelve his Lordship concluded; and the Jury
turned round, and were occupied in consultation for about ten
minutes, when they found the prisoner Guilty.
The Reconfira immediately ordered the prisoner up for judg-
ment, and sentenced him to be transported for fourteen years.
The Lady alluded to by the priioner was in Court during the trial.
Anne Clarke, a genteel-looking woman, aged 49, was
capitally indicted for stealing some silver spooils and
sheets, above the value of 40s. in the dwelling-house of
Henry Thwaites, Esq. of Euston-square. The prisoner
and her husband were left in care of Mr. Thwaites's
house during the absence of the family in the country.
On their return, it .was ascertained that the property
was taken, and was pledged by the prispner. The du-
plicates were found on her person, and she acknow-
ledged that the articles, named in them were Mr.
Thwaites's property. •
The Jury acquitted her of the capital part of the charge; but
found her Guilty of stealing to the value of 395. only.
Henry tiodfrey, aged 17, and ".1 homers Lock, aged
19, were capitally indicted for stealing, in the dwelling-
house of Jeremiah Tupman, a gold snuff-box, and other
larticles, value 25/. his property.
A shopman of Mr. Tupman proved that the prisoners
came to hit shop, in Great Russell.street, Bloomsbury,
on the 22d of July last, and asked to see a gold watch.
Witness said Mr. Tupman was up stairs, bat told them
to till
Waithis return. While they remained, witness,
•'
who was at work in the shop, had his attention more
than once called to them by a kind of rustling over the
'glass case. He looked, but did not see the prisoners
do anything particular. They were stooping over
the case, and admiring one article and then another.,
On Mr. Tupmaa's return the prisoners asked for a
second-hand gold hunting watch ? Mr. Tupman said
he had not such an article, and they left the shop.
While they were passing the window he began to sus-
pect, and on examining, it was found that a gold snuff-
box, a gold watch-case, and a gold watch, had been
taken from the glass case. He had seen the articles
there a few minutes before the prisoners came in.
The prisoners made no defence. Some witnesses were
called on their behalf, but they did not answer.
In the course of the trial some doubt arose whether
Mr. Tupmau's house was in the parish of St. George,
in which it was laid in the indictment. The officer, one
of the witnesses, said, he always understood from the
other officers that it was in the parish of St. George, and
Mr. Tupman said the same, but he could not say so of
his knowledge. The same collector of rates collected
f..r both parishes.
Mr. Justice LirrtzuaLE, in summ'ng up, observed,
that if the Jurymen were not fully satisfied that the
house of the prosecutor was in the parish of St. George,
they should acquit the prisoners of the capital part ri
the charge; and if they were satisfied that they were
the persons who took the articles, of which there seemed
little doubt, they must bring than in guilty of grand
larceny only.
The Jury, after consulting together for a short time, returned n
verdict—• Guilty of larceny.
Mary Reines, aged 29, was indicted for stealing a
watch, value £.5, the property of Richard Duckworth
Dunn, and in the dwelling-house of Mr. Grant, at
Westminster.

Richard Duckworth Dunn, a young Gentleman of
Westminster School, about 14 years old, was examined,
and stated that he boarded and lodged at the house of
Mrs. Grant, in Dean's yard. On the 12th of July, he
let his watch under his pillow in bed. lie altersva,as
asked the prisoner, who was a getvant in the house,
whether she 54w the watch? She denied nay ng seen
it. Witness had not got his watch since. T. e con-
stable has it.

Rev. George Preston, one of the ushers at %\'estmin
ter school, examinel—When the watch was misse
a search was made, and prisoner's box was opened in
her press-nce and the watch found.. The prisont: at first
denied all knowledge of the watch, but afterwards threw
herself on her knees, and begged for mercy, and admit-
ted that the devil had temp.ed her to take it.

• The prisoner made no ilvfence,lnt called
• A Lad,' with. wisbm• she had lived for many Tears,
and s, ho had known her'from her infancy. This 1.1ad7.
gave ter an ncellent character for-hOnesty arid sobriety.
. SiMaar'tes imony was borne to her general character,
hy a young' Lady arid Gentleman, the daughti-r 'a'id
son of the last. witness:
The Jury found her Guilty, but strongly recommended bee to
mercy, in sonsequenee c.fliter previous good character.
When the verdict was given, the Rev. Mr. Preston
'begged to state a-circumstance which led him to be-
lieve that the prisoner w'as young in crime. A short
time before the circumstance out of which the present
trial arose, the prisoner found a pocket-bock, in a hich
were 2.85. in silver. This she immediately took to the
housekeeper, until the owner could be foucd for. it.
When the owner was discovered, it was ascertained that
the book and money were exactly is the same state in
which she had found. them.
George Mitchell was capitally indicted for stealing a
silver coffee-biggin, and a silver milk-ewer, the property
of James Window, Esq. of Upper Bedford-place. The
evidence was quite satisfactory as to hit guilt. He was
detected coming out of the pantry in Mr. Window's
house, and being questioned as to his business there, he
threw down a bundle and ran off. A pursuit was raised,
and he was taken, but in his flight he threw down the
silver ewer. The coffee-biggin WAS in the bundle. In
the coin se of the trial the capital part of the indictment
was abandoned, by its being ascertained that the dwell-
ing-house of Mr. Window was erroneously laid as in
the parish of St. Pancras, instead of that of St. George,
Bloomsbury.
The prisoner was therefore convicted of the larceny only.
Joseph Jackson, aged twenty-one, was indicted frr a
burglary in the hou-e of Mr. Lomax, and steal ng there-
from a bracket clock, and other articles, his property.
Mr. Lomax prov..d that his house had been bmken
open on the night of the 22d of July, and the articles
in question stolen. On the following morning, about a
quarter-past three, the prisoner, in company %%Eh ann.'
ther man, was seen in 13 irtman-square, with the arti-
cles in their possession. The man who was in company
with the prisoner said the articles belonged to his mas-
ter, in a nt.ighbouring street, and that he would go for
him. He then threw down the articles.

Prisoner, in his defence, said, that he was locked out
of his lodging, and walked about till five o'clock, when
he met with a man who asked him to assist him in
taking the articles to Piccadilly, and on his way thither,
he was stopped by the watchman. The other man
ran away.
Several witnesses gave the prisoner a most excellent character
for honesty.
The Jury, after a few miautes consultation, returned a verdict
of Not Gaol ty.
NEW COURT.
Thomas Hammond was indicted for stealing on the
17th of July, in the parish of St. George, Hanover-
square, a gold snuff-box, value la from the person
of Sir George Beaumont, Bart.
Henry Hurd, a servant of the prosecutor, deposed,
that on the 17th of July he saw the defendant runniog
in the direction from St. George's Church. At the
desire of his master he followed him. Before he came
up with the prisoner he had stopped, and was speaking
to a man. When the witness came up with the pri
soner, he collared him, and told him that lie had
something which did not belong to him. The pri-
soner said he had not. The witness repeated his charge,
and then the prisoner, after some hesitation, produced
the prosecutor's snuff-box.
Sir George Beaumont deposed, that on the I.7th of
July, he missed his snuff-box as be was coming out
of church. He had kept it in his coat-pocket. He was
sure it was in his pocket only a minute or two before
he missed it. He desired his servant to follow the pri.
soner, thinking he was the person who had taken it
from his pocket. He had just before felt the prisoner
and another man pressing upon him. The prisoner,
when brought back by the servant, said that he had
picked up the box from the ground.
The prisoner, in his defence, repeated the statement of his having
found the box.
William Henry Smtth, a wax-chandler, in Clerken-
wel, deposed, that on Sunday, the 17th of July, he
saw a person, whom he believed to be the prisoner,
pick up something which he thought was a snuff-box
from the ground. He attended to-day in consequence
of an advertisement which appeared last Monday.
The advertisement was in the following terms If the Gen-
tleman who saw a young man pick up a snuff-box at the earner of
Maddox-street. Hanover-square, on Sunday, the 17th of July,
would call on Mr. Humphreys, Ma Solicitor, Broadway, Ludgate-
bill, he would render the advertiser an essential service."
The COMMON SERJEANT, in his address to the Jury,
-observed, with respect to the advertisement, that it
was very extraordinary that the prisoner should sups
pose that any particular individual should have seen
him pick up the snuff-box in the crowd. -
The Jury immediately returned a verdict of Guilty.
C. M'Donald was convicted of stealing a quantity
of lead, the property of the Imperial Gas-light Com-
pany, in whose employment he was.
Several witnesses gave testimony in favour of the
prisoner's previous good character, in consideration of
which the Jury recommended him to mercy.
The Cowles SEILT RANT said the offence could not be slurred over.
RIGA M Y.

Rephen Frederic Recd was indicted for bigamy.
Richard Lucas proved that the prisoner married his
(the witness's) daughter Eliza, on the 27th of August,
1813, at Ct;pplegatc Church. After living with her
far a year, he left her. She was still living.
Mary Anne Donahue deposed, that she had known
the prisoner upwards of two years. She was a servant
in the family of Mr. Freshfield, the solicitor. The
prisoner paid his addresses to her, and represented him-
self as a single man. She married him on the 11th of
March last, at Chi ist Church. She discovered that the
prisoner was married in about four weeks after the
ceremony. The witness was 21 years of age.
The Jury found the prisoner Guilty. Re was an ill-favoured
man, aged 28.

Thomas natt was also indicted for bigamy.
William Hearne was present when the prisoner mar-
ried the witness's wi.e's si,ter in 1820. She had three
children by the prisoner. She is still living.
Sarah Horton deposed, that she became acquainted
with the prisoner in 1321, and married him in 1822.
The prisoner slid he was single. The prisoner left her
in about 11 months afler marriage, and never returned.
She was in service, and left it to be married to the
prisoner. She had one child by the prisoner, which wa.,
now supported by the parish.
John Garner, a beaJle, proved that when he appre-
I/glided the prisoner oh the present charge, he was
•iving with his first wife and three childfun.
The Jury returned a verdict of Gorty.
The prisoner was 27 ye..rs of age, anti like the last, had nothing
to boast of on thr score of pasonal appe?rAnce. The girl
wir.m be last married, on contrary, possessed a very interest-
inicammenancr.

•-

•

-

- POl ICE. IATAZLIGt.NCE.

•
• OVILDTIALL. •
HOW, a watch and clock-maker, residing in Skinner-street,
sommoned fbrdetainiirg a watch, K hick had been given to him
lair. The abnplairsant; a lad about sixteen, said, about hve
Weeks ago he-calledior the wadi, and saw the sbopman, who toil
Mm that the watch was flisiChed, but•not timed, and Mr. ham hid
it' in Ms pocket, fbr• the purpose. On his second call he saw Ale.
Ham, when declared that he had delivered the watch to him (th,
complainant); and that heiradvaid him five shillings for the jou.
This the complainant dented.—Mt. Hans now stated, tint it INA
his invariable coattail to•enter the job in the book, when it was
brought into the house, and the person who delivered it :nuked it
off, and entered the- nameof tie person to whu:n it - was delivered.
The sum, paid for the repairs, was also paid over to the foreman,
and he accounted for it at the end af the week. This appeared to
have been tbecase.by the books- at account, which were produced.
and the foreman corroborated kb master's account as to melting
and accounting for the moneys.-
Mr. Alderman THORP said, there mat be a mistake somewhere.
He had no jurisdiction in the case, the complainant's only remedy
being by an action at Law.

• BOW-STREET.•
Two men, named Adams and Wood, were brought Wore Sir R..
Biatute on the following charge: Mr. Dickson and 'Air. Baker weie
some days since driving towards Fulham, in a chaile-can, wh,:u the
mare which drew It suddenly started at the sound isf a gun, and
kicked as if in great pain. She continued in this meaner until .Ir.
Dickson and Mr. Baker were thrown out, and severely injured in
their heads. They were taken to a neighbouring surgeon's shop,
and after a considerable lapse of time they were recovered. O.
making inquiries, It was discovered that the defendants, who are
jourheymen bakers, were the persons who had bred the gun.
S r Lt. limns told the prosecutors that there were two methods
of proceeding against the parties.--either by bringing ass actin*
against them, or indicting them at the Sessions. However, as the
defendants seemed to have eked innocently, he thought it would be
for the interest of all euneerned that they should retire and setae
the affair.
MARLBOROUGH-STREET.

Janes Wormer, a tailor, and .Efennor, his wife, who have been se-
veral days in custody upon a charge of starving and otherwise ill-
treating the daughter of the male prisoner a girl about fifteen years
of age, and instigating her to commit various acts of feLny, were
brought up for final examination.
The girl who is very intelligent for her sge, repeated her former
statements respecting the prisoner's conduct towards her. She gave
particular evidence as to one robbery she had committed in the shop
of Mr. Shoo'bred, a linen-draper in Tottenham Court-road.

The pawnbrokers with whom she bad pledged the goods, at-
tended and confirmed bee testimony; but neither Mr. Shoulbred
nor his @holmium could identify the articles stolen.
The Magistrate said, that the prisoners had very narrowly es-
caped the charge of felony for the present ; but fur their barbarous
and inhuman treatment of the child, of which there was abundant
proof, they could be indicted by the parish, and he would take good
care that they should be, as far as his representation went, unless
they promised to give the child entirely up to the aunt, who wa
very properly inclined to save her from ruin, and engage never to
go hear os interfere with either of them. The indictment would
still be banging over the prisoners, and the moment that be (the
Magistrate) should hear of their again molesting the girl, that mo-
ment be would apply to the parish to indict them.
The prisoners promised that they never would ; and on this an-
dcrst an ding, they were discharged, and the little girl given ap to
her aunt.

William Smith, a stable-boy, in the employ of Mr. Bevan, a
stable-keeper, Bloomsbury, was fuUy committed, for stealing
us. hl. from his master's bureau.
A man of respectable appearance was held to baU, for attempting
to suborn a lad who is to give evidence en the trial of Svapsm, now
in Newgate, for a revolting offence.
QUEEN-SQUARE.

A woman named Tairpin, mother of the notorious Jack Torpiu,
was remanded, on a charge of feloniously receiving a clock, the pro-
perty of James Sullivan. The clock was stolen by the proiecteur s
son from his fatbet's house, and, though it had init cost £2 6s. Nim
T. purchased it of the boy for 35.!

bi ART-LA-BONNE.

Yesterday, a young man of genteel appearance, was brought is
on a charge-of rubbery. Ile appeared in an army of grief. butt
into tears, and implored forgiveness. A Mr. Goner stated that the
young man had attempted to steal a pair of boots, hut was detected,
and on being questioned, refused to give his Dame. Mr. Hewitt,
the Chief Constabk said, on asking his name, it was immedi.
Ditty given to him, from which a conclusion was drawn that he was
Respectably connected. Mr. Gorter hearing from the Officers that
the prisoner was not a common offender. withdrew his charge, and
the young man exclaimed, " GOD bless you, Sir," and covering his
face with his hands, hurried out of the Office.
WORSHIP-STREET.
•

J. Morris, the proprietor of one of the Paddington coaches, was,
on the information of the noted Biers, fined £5 and costs, for csr-
rying one more than the allowed number of passengers on his war
to town on the 11th inst. The defendant did not appear.

A School for the reception and careful tending of the
children of labouring peer, during the hours sec. apart
for the daily toil of their parents, has been established
at Cheltenham, and *as opened on Monday la-t.
There is supposed to be more building going forward
at this time, in and about the Metropolis, than took
place in the whole kingdom. twenty years ago.
Some Men would wish the world to thank well of
them, yet they cannot be merry without vice, nor Meet with.
outetkeavouring to corrupt each other as much ai possible. Many
young and old think it a high piece of wit lo invent toasts which
modesty blushes to repeat; but, Wisdom says, our own vices ate
too much for us, without endeavouring to corrupt the minds anl
morals of every one around us • and, therefore, whatever these tine
Gentlemen may think of thetissilves, they eves were, and ever will
be, the pests of society, and cumentpt of wise men. Let them use
the following toasts; if they do net servo to mend their morals,
they will, at least, mend their manners:— "
1. May the King live long that seeks Ms People's love.
2. hlay liberty never make us licentious, nor restraint eve
make us sad.
3. May we never seek more liberty titan constitutes our .bappi.
ness, nor more freedom than tends to public good.
4. May we never desire plenty, but to relieve the unhappy. and
succour the distressed.

S. May we be happy eoough to find friends, but never so mice•
rable as to put them to a severe trial.
6. May we be more ready to correct our own faultslhan to pub-
lish the faults of others.
7. May we never be suck slaves to custom as to take one step is
vice, fur the fear of being unfashionable.
I. May we never rashly believe the reports we hear, nor bud!,
censure the mate we hear nor.

9. May we never be so far misled as to think a rich man wife
merely for his wealth.
•
10. May we never be so extravagant as to beggar ourselves from
being ashamed of poverty, nor so coeetous as to live beggars fur
fear of being poor.
11. Slay the better fortune of others never pat of out of comet
with our own.
12. May we never speak what we are ashamed to repeat, nor do
that which we may blush to hear repeated.
15. May we always be assured that happiness Is a jewel not to be
purchased by aU the sovereigns in the world.
14. May envy, like a bubble, burst, and merit shine.
15. May every one's conduct be so uniform that he may not be
ashamed to take a retrospective view of it.
RICHARD TURNER.
BLACKING 31ANUFACTURUIL
114, London Road, Southwark.

[MAR
W aterfurd

It ATI.3.—THIS DAT.
♦ua IbUll.
1 0 Franco
1 1 Ho trountb

.i4efitsc7 saJ Jens, 0 1
Lisboa 1 0

ass• WI
0
0 0

Flandtrs
Buenos Ayres

o 0
o 0

Gottrnburgh
Malta
Holland

• O blahs 0 0
• 0 America 0
O 1 Leeward islands 0 0

HIGH-WATEK at LONDOR-BRICIGR
Morning 18 minutes after
.5
Afttrnoon • 42 minute% after 5

I.oMom Prustal aid flubluhexi by J. F. KILA LT, .14 the :2 411
.V 3 1, Puha- Mute, 7ernple.ll4.

IMMIIINN•...._