Star.
London, England, 1809-02-18 00:00:00

and when the prisoner was again brought in, the
Chairman addressed him to the following effect
Captain Sanden, I am instructed to inform you,'
that already a very heavy punishment has been in-
flicted on you for gross prevarication in your evi-
dence, and that if you still persevere in gross preva-
rication, you will find that you have not already ex-
peiienced the 'whole of the punishment which the
House has it in its power to inflict."
• Captain SANDEN declared he would not prevaricate,
but would speak the truth.
Q. (By Mr. WHITBREAD.) Do you recollect that
in a conversation with Colonel Namilton, you stated
this note to have been destroyed ? A. No, 1 do not
recollect that I said so.
Q. (Be. Sir G. WARRENDER.) Were you to receive
any future advantage or emolument, for suppressing
this part of the evidence ? A. No, certainly not.—
Q. What was the motive which induced you'to con-
ceal the existence of this note, until the punishment
inflicted upOn you induced you to mention it ? A. I
had no particular motive for keeping it back.—Q. Do
you mean to say, that without any direct motive you
told a deliberate falsehood yesterday at the bar? A.
lam sorry to say that I did.—Q. Did you, or did you
not, think this note of importance ? A. Certainly I did.
Q. In what way did you think it of importance
A. I knew that was the note which I presented to
Major Tonyn, which induced him to wait with pa-
tience for some time longer.—Q. Although you might
think this note important, as bearing upon the case,
why was it of importance to you to conceal it from
the Committee ? I have no particular reason.—
Q. When you shewed the note to Colonel Hamilton,
did he tell you it was the hand writing of the Duke
of York ? A. No ; when I mentioned it to him, he
asked me what sort of hand writing it was, whether
in a free open hand, or in a small hand ; he also asked
me how the t's were formed ?—Q. Did you think that
you would have exposed yourself to any danger or
inconvenience by acknowledging the note before ?
A. No, I did not.—Q. Then why did not you
acknowledge it ? A. I cannot tell.
• The witness was then ordered to withdraw.
Mr. W. SMITH then said, he hoped that Captain
Sanden would not be brought again to the Bar to give
evidence. He had so completely disqualified himself
from any sort of credit, that he thought it would be
worse than wasting time to ask him any more ques-
tions.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
said, he by no means differed with the Honourable
Gentleman who spoke last, as to the credibility of
the witness alluded to ; but he could wish that he
might be permitted to appear once more at the bar,
as it might be in his power to give some clue, or
throw some light on the papers which had been so
recently put under the consideration of the House, in
consequence of his prevarication, and the measures
adopted thereon.
Mr. WARDLE, alluding to the mode in which
the present question had been introduced to the Com-
mittee, and the pomp with which the Chancellor of
the Exchequer had brought it forward, as if he (Mr.
Wardle) had been guilty of any offence, left it to
Gentlemen to say if they felt now as they seemed to
have felt last night, and if the evidence adduced sup-
ported their statement ? He declared most sincerely,
that he had never seen Captain Sanden till he saw
him at that bar. He had, however, been treated by
the Right Hon. Gentleman, as a person who had
tampered with the witnesses. He felt, however, that
the inuendo was that he had suppressed the evidence.
The CHANCELLOR t'if the EXCHEQUER
thought the mode in which the Honourable Gentle-
man chose to address the House most inexcusable.
He owed that duty to the Royal Person, or to any
other man in a public situation, accused of practices
similar to.those imputed to ;he Royal Duke, to act
the part he had done. He chose rather to act that
part openly, than through the means of others, but
he did not in the most distant degree throw out any
insinuation against the Honourable Member or any
other person. His statement had not been dictated
by pomp, but by a quite contrary feeling.
Mr. WHITBREAD stated, that according to his
conception, nothing, had fallen from the Right Ho-
nourable Gentleman which should have occasioned
uneasiness to his Honourable Friend. Ile thought
himself called or. thus far to do justice to the Cl,nte -
tenor of the Exchequer, ftnzt aim/ that 'he
should have been happy if the same justice had been
done to his Honourable Fiend by every Member of
the House, as by the Right Hon-airahle the Chancel-
lor of the Exchequer. He was pleased to have it in
his power to bear testimony to the conduct of that
Right Honourable Gentleman.
Lord H. PETTY concurred with Mr. Whitbread
in passing a compliment on the conduct of the Chan-
cellor of the Exchequer.
Mr. WARDLE most willingly apologised for hav-
ing misconceived the Right Honourable Gentleman's
meaning. He never meant to throw out any insinua-
tion against the conduct, but only as to the manner
of the Right Honourable Gentleman.
Captain SAN DEN was then called in and examined
by Lord FOLKESTONE.
Q. Have you any recollection of the time before
the appointment of Major Tonyn, at which you shew.
ed the note of Mrs. Clarke to Major Tonyn ? A.
Eight, nine, or ten days.--Q. I with you to look into
that paper. How came it intb the possession of Cap-
tain .Sanden ? A. It was rolled up as an envelope
to the nate from the Duke of York to Mrs. Clarke.---
Q. Why was that bit of paper used as an envelope to
the letter ? A. I cannot positively sayL-I really
cannot recollect.—Q. Try if you can recollect ?. A.
I believe, if my memory will catty me through, it
was when the Duke was reviewing the troops on the
coast. Mrs. Clarke produced, and then tore off part
of it, and gave the bit to the witness.—Q. How could
that letter, not having the Duke's name on it, con-
vey any proof of the other letters being the Dillee of
York's'? A. I cannot say.— Q, Why should Major
Tony* gain more credit with them than any other ?
A. I cannot say.
Q. (By GENERAL LOFT.) How came you to go to
Mrs. Clarke's that day ; was it by accident, from
intention, or in consequence of her solicitation
Was any other person present ? A. I can't say.—Q.
On what business did you go there ? A. On her so-
licitation, that I might go to Tonyn's, and shew the
note from the Duke of York.---.Q.Was it a contrivance
between Mrs. Clarke and you to keep Mr? Tonyn
from reclaiming his papasl A. I knew of no con-
trivance.

.4

The witness went on to lime. that the note was
given to him, and he took it to Major Tonyn. It
was no contrivance by Mrs. Clarke and the witness
to fabricate the note.
Captain Huney Sitenzte was remanded to New-
gate.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
then suggested that the Chairman should report pro-
gress, and ask leave to sit again on Monday, if it
should be found necessary.
The House was accordingly resumed, and the
Committee ordered to sit again on Monday.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
stated, that an Hon. Member had suggested doubts
as to the authenticity of the letter, many of the charac-
ters being written with more formality than was per-
ceptible in the general writing of his Royal Highness.
It might therefore be proper that the writings now on
the table should be kept locked up in the custody of
the Clerk, that Members of the House should have
access to them, and also such other persons acquainted
with the comparison of writings as might be suggested,
and whom the Speaker might approve of.
After some conversation this suggestion was acceded'
to, and the hours for inspection of the papers were fixed
to be from eleven in the forenoon to three in the after-
noon.—Adjourned at Half-past One o'Clock.

HOUSE OF LORDS. • •.-
Gregion's Divorce Bill was read a third time 'nd passed.
The Malt Duty Bill, the £10,300,000 and £1,500,000 Exche-
quer Bills Bills, were read a second time, and committed for
Monday.
On the motion of Earl BATHURST, Accounts were ordered
of the number of British Ships which had cleared out front the
British Colonies in North America, and the West Indies,' for
1807 and 1805..
On the motion of Lord GRENVILLE, after a few words from
Earl BATHURST, an Account was ordered of the amonnt of
Exports and Imports between this country and Spain and Fur-
! tugal.

•
MILITIA. •
On the motion of the Earl of LIVERPOOL, the Militia En-
..stinent Bill was ordered to be read a second time on Monday,
and thu Lords to he summoned.
The Earl of ROSSLYN expressed a wish to have sonie Re-
turns laid before the House respecting the Military Force of the
Country—to which the Earl of LIVERPOOL said there ,was no
objection.

ORDERS IN COUNCIL.
Lord GRENVILLE rose to make his promised
motion. It wonld, he said, be in their Lordships re-
collection, that in consequence of the sentiments felt
and expressed by every class of merchants and ma-
nufacturers in this kingdom, he had, _on a former oc-
casion, distinctly and fully stated his opinions and
his arguments upon the question, which this night
his duty called upon him again to bring before their
Lordships, a question involving not merely the com-
mercial and financial interests, but the rolitical and
moral justice, nay, in its ultimate effects, the safety,
perhaps the existence, of the Empire. It would
likewise, he said, be in the recollection of their
Lordships, that when upon a former occasion he
addressed them on this subject, he was induced by
a motive of fairness and candour towards his Ma-
jesty's Ministers, and for the sake of obtaining more
correct information on some essential points than at
that time appeared before the House, he meant the
propositions made by the American Government to
the King's Ministry respecting the Orders in Council
and the Embargo ; and here his Lordship said, he
felt it incumbent on him to make atonement for some
expressions which on that occasion had fallen from
him in consequence of a misrepresentation which had
been made to him of the Speech delivered by the Pre-
sident to the American Congress. The Noble Lords
on the oppcetite side would do him the justice to re-
member, that, under the impression of the statement
made by the Noble Secretary of State, of the drift
and substance of that Speech, his Lordship had
frankly and implictly acquiesced in thd unfairness
then ascribed to Mr. Jefferson, and in his partiality
to France. His Lordship had since been able to as-
certain, with more correctness, the truth of those
expressions uttered by the President, by which not
only himself, but -many other Noble Lords, had been
misled. From the authentic and printed documents
upon their Lordships table, to which he should pre-
sently resort, he would make it manifest to every
Noble Lord who heard him, that, so far from un-
fairness, or partiaTity exhibited on the par:. of Ame-
rica against this Country, and in favour of France,
nothing could possibly be more fair or impartial,
exceptindeed what his Lordship maintained was
truly the case, a partiality, and avery important one,
in favour of this country. The propositions sent by
the American Government to that of this Country,
were said to be so framed as to threaten hostility and
a junction with France, in case of our refusal to meet
their offered suspension of Embargo, by cancelling the
Orders in Council, while their proposal to France re-
quired no other equiYalent than the withdrawing of
their Commercial Restrictions. Now the papers be-
fore their Lordships will shew, beyond the shadow of
ally doubt, that the terms advanced by America to
France, and this Government, were not only in their
sense and spirit, but in their very terms of expression,
precisely and literally the same. Here his Lordship
read the instructions sent by the American Govern.;
ment to Mr. Armstrong in Paris, and to Mr. Pinck-
ney ill London, whereby it appeared that the pro-
posal to this Government was, that, on the part ofl
America, the Embargo should be suspended, pro-
sided we would rescind the Orders in Council; and
this being agreed upon, it was added, that should
France refusa to cancel her Decrees, she must ne-
cessarily go to war with America, The same
proposition, and in the same terms, was made to.
the Government of France ; so that here was a
fair opportunity of not only conciliating the Ame-
rican States, and restoring the good understanding,
and the solid advantages from it resulting to both
countries, but a strong probability was afforded of a
cordial and active co-operation, by a powerful Ally,
in prosecuting war against the common enemy. His
LOrdship reprobated, in very strong terms, the con-
duct of Ministers, which appeared to have been sug-
gested by no motive of wisdom, justice, or policy,
but to grow out of a principle of petty and despica-
ble pride. Bonaparte had boasted, or threatened,
that he would leave us without a single'Ally, and
Ministers appeared desirous, by the display of a silly,
romantic, and ruinous spirit, to meet him •on the
ground he had chosen. They reminded him of a
certain person, pf whom he had somewhere read,
that, having received a severe Wound, was, by the
orders *of his friends; prevented from receiving any
kind of medical or surgical aid, until it should be

fairly tried whether the wound of itself was really
mortal or not. From the papers on the table, he de.
duced a deplorable falling off in the amount of Im-
ports and Exports from and to the American States
last year. His Lordshipnext adverted to the deplorable
condition in which multitudes of industrious manufac-
turers, with their families, were placed by the perni-
cious operation of these orders. In Manchester alone
forty thousand were now unemployed. In Birming-
ham, Sheffield, and other great towns of manufacture,
the proportions of distress were correspondent. The
same was true in almost ever, .dther part of the Em-
pire. In Ireland especially, the whole of the northern
district, that part of the kingdom 'the most industrious,
populous, and prosperous, WAS reduced to a condition
of unexampled distress. It had been customary for
the soil of that part of Ireland to produce annually
forty-five thousand hogsheads of flax seed, of which
thirty-five thousand were constantly sent to America.
With respect to that most important article corn, it
_was well known to their Lordships and to the world,
that this country did not produce a. quantity of it at
all adequate to its own consumption ; and now that
we were deprived of all our former sources of supply
from the northern ports of Europe, it became peculi-
arly necessary to obtain it through America.. But if
'Ministers, as seemed to be their object, were deter-
mined to force that country into war with us, what
.might be the consequence, in this point of view, ir
would well become their Lordships seriously to con,-
sider.—His Lordship concluded by moving,
" That an humbli Address be presented to his Majesty, humbly
to represent to his Majesty, that in consequence of certain Dee:
erees made by his Majesty's enemies, contrary to the usages eV
war, and to the rights of neutral nations ; and also in consequence
of the alledged acquiescence of neutral nations in the said D,
trees, his Majesty was advised to issue certain Orders in Council
, respecting the trade of neutrals to and from the ports and coun-
tries of his Majesty's enemies : and that the said Orders were
further enforced by certain Acts passed in the last Session of Par-
liament : but that both in the said Orders and in the Acts passed
thereon, a power was reserved to his Majesty of annulling the
same, whenever such revocation should appear expedient.
" That the Congress of the United States of America, alarm-
ed at the dangers to which neutral commerce was exposed, by
the said Decrees, and by the system then known to be in the
contemplation of his Majesty's Government, and actually carried
into effect by the said Orders in Council, passed laws for laying an
immediate embargo on all American vessels and exports.
" And that by the operation of such laws, all trade of export,
from' the said States into this kingdo.o or its dependencies, has
been prohibited, and the commercial intercourse of his Majesty's
subjects with the said States has been, in other respects, essen-
tially impeded.
" That in the month of August last, the Minister of the United
States, resident at this Court, made to his Majesty's Govern-
ment an authorised and explicit offer of re-establishing the said'
intercourse, proposing, that if his Majesty's Orders in Council
should be repealed, as far as regarded the United States. the Em-
bargo imposed in the said States should be removed, as far as
regarded his Majesty's dominions; and adding, that if his Ma-
jesty's enemies should not rescind their Decrees, the said Embargo
should be continued as with respect to them.
" That this offer on the part of the United States appears to us
just in principle, and in its tendency highly advantageous to the
essential interests of this country. lust, in as much as it removed
all pretence of the acquiescence of the United States in the French
Decree; which acquiescence was the only ground on which any
right could accrue to his Majesty to ieterrupt the innocent com-
merce of a Neutral Power ; and advantageous to Great Britain,
inasmuch as it it should not have produced the Repeal of the
French Decrees (the avowed purpose of his Majesty's Orders), it
must have secured to this country the exclusive commerce of Ame-
rica, and the Alliance against a Power which has become the come
mon enemy of both.
"'Tat we believe and hope that it is still open to his Majesty
to renew, on the basis of this proposal, the commercial inters
course between this country and the United States; every inter-
ruption of which we consider as manifestly injurious to the inter-
I est of both, and particularly calculated, in the present crisis, 'to
assist the designs of our enemies,and to weaken our own resources.
" That we, therefore, must humbly pray his Majesty to adapt,
without delay, such measures as may best tend to the immediate
re-establishment of the conunerctal intercourse between his Ma.
jesty's dominions and the United States of America, and to bring,
by temperate and conciliatory negociatioe, all other points of dif-
ference to a just and amicable conclusion.
" Assuring his Majesty of oue firm and invariable support, iri
maintaining, against every unjust aggression, and every novel
claim, the ancient and essential maritime rights of his Majesty's
Crown."
Lord BATHUSRT then rose, and remarked with
strong emphasis on the novelty of the Address, and
said, as it was the obvious intention of the Noble Lord
to convey a censure upon Ministers for their supposed
misconduct, it would have been more manly to have
proposed an Address to remove Ministers at once, than ;
by a side wind to impeach them for misconduct. The
Noble Lord then went into a discussion of the French
Decrees, that gave rise to the Orders in Council, and
justified their expediency, which he said the late Mi-
nistry had themselves admitted by the Order of Coun-
cil issued on the 7th of January, 1807. He denied
that the embargo was the consequence of the Orders
in Council issued by this country, as those Orders were
not lshown in America till three days subsequent to
passing the Embargo Act. He also denied that the
deficiency of four millions in our exports, was attri-
butable to that embargo, and the operation of the Or-
ders alluded to ; on the contrary, it originated more
from the operation of the Non-Importation Act, and
the diminution of our trade to the Baltic. His Lord--
ship next alluded to the scarcity of flax seed and tim-
ber, which the Noble Baron had laid so much stress
upon, and had drawn so alarming a picture about.
He said it was true that great supplies of flax seed
could not be expected from 'Canada before June next,
and though large speculations for a supply of that
article had been made on the Continent, tt was cer-
tainly one that could not be satisfactorily relied on fur
the present use ; but in case both those soufces failed
for
—At
te mthoemohseeraidnpretd,aetyet there were large tracks of land
in Ireland, which had very properly been employed
0,121.
in the culture of flax seed, which would for the pre-'
sent furnish a requisite supply. His Lordship next read
a variety of returns of imports from South America,
and argued, from their progressive increase, the most
beneficial results might be expected. The tonnage
ist-Hrtv.oa.inovsie.
staves imported
in 1807 was 14,434, and for 3-4ths
of the succeeding year 1808, it amounted to 30,735.
million
In
;18a0n7d therein
thewere
n3hdei
seven
etlehhi6volte,:du2nsor
n 96,
f9resttdlthhl
sooeytoaruoeesdsaisartnwh: odheefaer timbernrepiednr aiwnitoesochnriepee import-
edprincipal
second.
n
enforced by the Noble Mover, that of rescinding the
Orders in Council, and observed, that by repealing
those- Orders, on the suggestion of America, we
sLh oorud
Ordersl
power,ds.
abpnne
deaacknowledginguberens teeelvffeveeerthe,
cs ascendancy
e
at
objecth nation.at
o f bringing
rf ns
gs
tmed,
France to reason, and inducing her to repeal her de-
crees against our commerce, then would his Majesty
rescind use Order's in Council ; and concluded with
giving Isis-decided negative to the address.

31;:

• Lord SIDMOUTH arred on the propriety of e,e
Address, and differed with his Noble Friend as to
some of the grounds he had advanced in support of
it. His Lordship defended the Order of Council of
the 7th of January, 1807, and said, it was issued Nr
the pjirpose of preventing the French from carrying
on their coasting trade under a neutral flag. He
said; it did not militate against the just, legitimate,
and innocent trade of the neutral ; nor did it invade
the laws of nations. He thought Ministers had done
wrong in rejecting the offers of America in August
last, and hoped to see the intercourse renewed.
said Ministers must take their stand on sound princi.
pies, and not suffer them to compromise our interests,
by becoming the carriers of the enemy's produce frcat
his colTonies ; but, at the same time, they should
out the hand of amity and reconciliation.
Lord MELVILLE spoke at great length, at
took a comprehensive view of the subject. He said,
the Berlin Decree had two objects ; first, it prescribed
regulations for neutral nations, without the power cf
enforcingthose regulations ; and, secondly it menaced
the maritime world with that same sort of tyranny
that France had spread over the several States of
the Continent. The Orders in Council that followed
were justified as measures of retaliation, and said,
that neutrals, while they talked of their rights, should
also think of their duties, and keep an even hand
with the belligerents. His Lordship said, the best
-security for.. e ,ntantime rights of neutrals, was the
,observance of the principles of war laid down in
1750,-Which.probitaited neutrals from protectir.g the
:Coasting Ohdete itte enemy with their • flag, and ac-
knowledged the right ofialockade, and the right of
checking contraband trade. It was true his Lord-
ship said, that America had offered to take off I,:r
embargo, .if we would rescind our Orders in Coun-
cil ; the consequence of which would be, that Ame-
rica Would get rid of a grievous hurthen, and would
be enabled to become the carriers of the enemy's ca.
lcinial produce. If England was to consent to that
proposition, she would immediately abandon her mea-
sures_ of retaliation zgaitast France, and defeat the ob-
ject for which those Orders were originally framed
At'the same• time, he did tint wish the prosperity of
this country should be encreased by the adversity of
Atinerica ; or that we should drive her mta the arms
of France. He thought the existing differences ,:c.i,zht
yet be reconciled, and he trusted in God they v:ou.,±
be. But the pressure was not so great as to call for
the interposition of the House in the way suggested,
or warrant the Address proposed. He saw nothing
Sp. condemn Ministers for in the part they had taken
with- respect to the Orders in Council, and he could
not condemn them without condemning the whole
House, which had-agreed to them after mature con-
' sideration, and many lengthened discussions. He
should therefore give his negative-to the Address.
• Lord AUCBI.AIi 1) supported the Address, and enforced the
arguments of the Noble-Mover. •
The LORD CHANCELLOR took a comprehensive vita of
the subject, defended the Conduct of Min stets, and insisted ups;
the expediency of the Orders la Council,
Lord ERSKINE spoke in support of the motion.
The Earl of LIVERPOOL answered the arguments of the No,
ls'e Baron; and defended the 014 res hi Oatmeal on did principle
of rotcliatioo.. His Lordship de-1 that the Revenutiof the cour.•
try was.in a ifoking state, se ,•-iba4 by the Noble Lord oppo-
site ; on the contrary, the surplus of the Catelidated hind
alone had inctiaced; during the last'ehres yerits, to the nun 4:
£3,1135,000.•
—.Lord GRENVILLE replied. •
question was then put, and the House divided on Lord
Grldirildtl motion.—Contents 64, Non-cosgents 51; 115. Proxies
----',tents 39;70. Majority 45.-" Adjourned at half past 9

or-
• -Yesterdly Sii DAyla Baits. set off lit his own cotrizinfr.o
Portsmollth for sown. attended by Dr. M‘Gaitoott, and Captain
Gime:soar, Aid-de.t amp . •
The second battalion of the -38th Rs/intent of Poot, quartered
at Abingdon;. have !nun Oltir march for Plymouth. •
The Deanery of.Sctisatrav,: alluded to in Mrs. CLARIteS ex.
amination, has been presented to a young Gentleman who mar-
ried one of the Duke of Bt4iitollt3'il daughters. Mr. Ti
Laor
had previously obtaiifed the Deaneriof Exeter sfitoe his Marr:ale.
LLNT MUSICAL4.--4.ast nleht the. Oratorio season at the
irriarket may lie said to Flee regularly co'rninenced. Tte
appearance of the audiences and the satisfactica they expressed
were indicative of a sueccssful spt cx atian.
Thursday a very moieneholy accident happened at Frentford.
.As the Oxford post coach was passing through that place, tl e
door V it flew open, and a most affectionate and interesting little
girl, about six years of age, second daughter of Mr. Roberscn,
Attorney, of Oxford, who was in her way to school, fell out, ant
the wheel of the coach passing over her head, she was kilied en
thh spot.
The Intrepid, in fourteen days, from Alicant, with Spar.ie:
wool, has arrived in the Downs, bug she brings no news.
• Another vessel, the Traveller, alas strived at Liverpool fr,:t.
New-York, with 500 bags of cotton. She sailed on the 16th t. t.
The cotton was shipped in a few hours only. and she put tc see
before the bonds required by the Embargo Act were eat:voted.
The Jant, Brown, from Quebec, for Grangemouth, has pa into
Newfoundland, with the loss of fort-mast, bowsprit, and anchor
and cable.
-

ul
The Swan, ---, from Limerick, for London, has uystt
lioundstone Bay. Cargo saved.
The New Guide, (an American) Croaker frost Alicant, was
:captured of Dover on the 12th ult. and carried into Ca:ais.
The Adventure, Horn, bound to Jamaica, and the U7:i an., I Lag,
for Barbadoes, have put back to Cork. The Union, liines, fraer.
Cork, for Earbadoes, has put back to Vintry Ear.
Ptvatotf-r as, 18..—This evening arrived the IMPLACABLE,
of 7S guns; last from Torbay, to repair the damage she sustained
last weektiii,e severe gale. Arrived the PALLAS frigate, of sZ
guns, Hooourakle s 4 F. SETRIOTII; the Marmara, of 32 B;/S.
Captain Haiwarliss,:frolo a eruize ; the MINSTREL sloop of is
guns, Captain Hetaitsviorra, from the eastward ; a.:l the
SereLcow, of 18 guilt, from off Corunna. .
Pa.vaiouta Dom Eta. 16,—Several of the unfortunate are
drowned by the upsetting of the Barfleues launch, have been
Washed on shore, -and awing the rest, the unfortunate

Foot, of the Marines.
Poi-rissettre, Vas. 17.—Nothing arrived or sailed this day
Dropt down to St. Helen's his7Majesty's• ship Quebec; a!ic tht•
Candi; Batt 'nehmen. About 40 sail of transports are crciet,d
to Cork under convoy of his Majesty's slap Port Mahon.
DM, Fee. 17.,—Sailed his Majesty's 'ships Rot:di and rc:r
on a cruise. Came down from the River, the Mary, 1/.:KIJN,
for the Brazils; Indispensible, Barr, for the SaUth ; ar!
several other ottward bound vessels, which remain in the Do,Ar;
with his Majesty's ships, Ste. as per last, —Wird S.W.
Gt.svcsitso, "Es. 17.—Passed by the Flaiton, Spurs, from
Quebec ; and the Johanna, from' Lisbon.—Sailed the C.:cad,,
Dews ;Ind the Baltic Merchant, Smith, for St. Vinunt's ; Go'
thuds, 'Lowe, for Teneriffe ; Centurion, Douglas, V.'illiara L.csh-
iugton, Sally, and the Jack Tar, Grant, for Jamaica.
Yasimotrr Ft, FRll.l7.—Arrived the Euryalus frigate,! Z,;-.6313
sloop, and Censor gun-brig.—Sailed the Calypso sloop of sts.tr,4:l
Seselark schoopef.—Witid S.W.

Maitatits.—On Tuesday last, at Astbury, in Clieshtro, 'o`'o
Antrobus, Esq. of Cheszn, Surrey, to Mrs. Bence, of ll<<o::S'•:r,
street, Qusep•square.

PlitleE 671'OCkS 11-11, DAY A
• Consols, for mosey, 6711—for February 67-i —Onat. •T •
Escheoner Bills 12s. to 13s. pre.

0/4bON : Printed and Published by LEVEL KENT, of CA
tetbit:y Ylsee, Lambeth, at the 5T1_11..07 TIC it, No. 1, Ls °j'
street Ptibiblied taw athe STAR...Of h:11% Temple nar.

IIPP"

,
I 'lilt
,
,

•
• 11.4
• :101
.
Nuag
4.41
_
Fa
Tem(
,On 1
opera,
geenerl
entireli
;t
a
ke
c-
af 'llOOl
d-
le-
Tat,
tat
ra-
from. ki
:d tio.
of *here
of cs,J
ms 11414
eior
"ht alsont
4'l'4
for aa esti
ed,
irg
Ken
uld from
wle pt`
die of
!Olt- tut NO
He soal
I tilt 131).Y)1
whati
War
rr of
these
ar.da he
fair.
No, T.Ne
ecCir
3PF and
0-
lund the •
tat 4:
Lord
rlroxies
nut 9
Fur
.ft).3l the
aitaza Vf 1
lied
rterrd
tu:
r's ex. f"'
I:At
rr.ar-
LIQT
14
yes
at the
The of
,teset4 ect
• fos
Itford. sal
tl e yl
g little ful
ferSCD,
L:t, ani
['led ea
Itu
;par.ie:
411
frlm
erh
tt stl
?".1t i:1!0
anchor
apt!. Lti
nt, was
,S.
es, fr2r.
ICARLIt
ustained
e, of Ss:
32 gs,tlS,
)p of 19
rid thr
late urea
ve bert
c •
is day
the
e crdtr d
nd 1"3:e
ft.:KsaN,
as
;
it DC"ko
irs, from
•
; Gr 4.
•
•
Zc7.0.013
•6..3
fvon:hiet•
i
r, of CA'
1, Ca
nar.
4