Star.
London, England, 1813-12-16 00:00:00

articles
Mc. _ given,
the /Aye 6. ..der half
-iiiss Ewa Anode; , AZ,
.- _ took out . ___ ....ministration, .- ...chit -- , •trfteed,eunifer die penalty of Five Pounds
• Eisen* ' -4!: •-' 4' Mrs. a Jeueeeine plaintiff was illegitimate • and he by his next friend. itheisiiilleshimel. - . •
The Fable, the leper, eif evhickie laid in and .fited a bill to set s .
.?
aside the allininsltratien. The Lord I . etts4eagepte_,Yetterday an investigation of rather
. near•tbeport o(Dieppee in Normandy, is as followN Chancellor directed' an iisneeto be tried in, the Court
i an extieemlbeire nature took place before Mn. N AKE%
' Arica' "Mori loves, 'staid is beloved by :Vita 4
.nO5, I of King's Bench, to decide On the legitimacy or, iHe-
.4,
t a isciung English lady, Vain' with her aunt, 'swat I • •
. giumacy of the2plaintial• The Jury fourtd a verdict . ander Ate following, circumstances: -Mr. Wynch. a
Gentleinan who resides in Grosvenor-place, and Mrs.
, ' abtser efreniftle talelantlematell maid, miles on an Ifer the plainti,f,. declming his legitimacy. The bar- ! Motes,
„Amato, left beseby bee...faeher, in die neighbourbeod ned Counsel mode the present notion for the defets-. fa w, who resides next door to him, with their
.. of Dieppe laroullebs4s. an officer serving in the dents, on the ground that they had tound further mi.-, . , was
' have for some time been at variance; the
latter, ir alleged, having improperly got posses-
sante regiment with...4feriee, but of superior rank, is deuce to prove the illegitimacynl the plaintiff
• I Sion of the former'e coach-pause and stable. In the
• ' also enamoured with tier: The rivals fight a duel, -
Mr. leed., Cotreael for the Plaintiff, said that this ' month of• January last, a chest of drawers, the pro-
in lebiehlitoblals. is 4dee'end left fur deed.- Mr'
was only made for delay. There were no af- perty of Mr. Wynch, was stolen from his loft : lately
. .11beelawie brought to *rig, and-a severe punishnient is
• fidavits that they had found new evidence since the Mr: Wynch had strong suspicion that his drawers
2tirdged him few having challenged his conamapclais
- had: trial, nor of what nature it was. He; therefore, trusted : were in a house in Wilton-street, Grosvenor-place,
ilea : ironer-but 911eUlegn En'slanPtd,ivatewhereimidier*fiza"viibursiguki his Hondur would dismiss the motion with costs. occupied by William Blackhall and Mary his wife •
,
both of them servants to Mts. Mor-phew, 'and which
fth m
leeted lugs with great humanity, repays the ebliga. The Vies CRANCELLOR was.of opinion e otion
tialtilje • her lover over whom be was cen• ought to berefused. He, therefore, ordered it to be they let out ready furnished. He, in consequence,
. eiaillelentekelleaessuniet. The piece cone.-- -Ts Vete discharged, with costs. obtained 'search-warrant, and, on the Ist' instant,
_- . •
_,.. 1 Pearkes the officer went to execute it at the house in
m where -., TURNER, BART. V. BAZELEV, CLEBIC6 ' Wilton-street. Sarah Gardener accompan
re ied' the
\lied. " ills. -this..case, in whiCh an Injunctkm had been officer sad identified a chest of drawers, which we •
. He jmn*_tt sill tbe coming-in of the answer, to rettrain the stolen last winter out of the 'loft over her mastex's
profes- •-• -iiedtitit to proceed in an action at law in order to s a e.-The got. ng positt .
t IA • l bei ' 've that the drawers Were
, dead,' recover from the present plaintiff, 'Sir Ore,•.gory Page
her master's, Blackhell attended,with the officer be-
,,, Gail. Tamer, the sum of X 13,000, which had been agreed fore Mr. NARKS. when, although his account was not
*Mat of upon to be paid by the -present plaintiff, to the de-
Mr. NAsas did not detiin hire' in cus-
,leituae fondant, as the price of certain pictures purchased by I,od e ,
y, out hisTOOlt. Wrtakirlf. his appearance at a future.
piece., It is the 'plaintiff from the deferMant, the LORD CHAN.
day. A full investionon of • the circumstances am-
biniself, not cra.Loa,
.on hearing Counsel, dissolved the Injuneel coring y took piece. yesterday, ,
cr 1 when Blackbelliat-
Cidnundaner lion, seeing nothing in the answer on which his Lord-
- . ent ded. . , e
ship could fasten the jurisdiction of a Court of EqUitt. Mar hi ch tia 'anotherg d'ihc'h'at,'
y t a , set vattt of M.
COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DECEMBER, IS. attended, and the drawers being produced in the
SCMEINER V. NORRIS. office, she fully identified them as the-same Which
This action was brought for the recovery of da- were stolen from her toaster's led law winter.
, sieges for the non•perlormance of a contract for a ' Mr. John Robins, auctioneer of ,Warwick•street,
' quantity of cotton yarn. It appeared by the evidence ' stated, that a few years since he made three chests of
il that the only memorandum that passed ache occa- ' drawers for Mr. Wynch, and he had every reason to
•i &ion, was a bill of parcels, in which theendant's • believe that the drawers produced were one of the sets.
. name was in copper-plate, and he was-described there. ii Mr. Wynch stated, that he ..believed the drawers
' in as an-agent : the plaintiff's name was inserted in I found in Blackball's house were those stolen front his
writing, as well as the particulars of the pencil yarn, loft is the month of January last. •
i but it was not proved in whose hand-writing. The I Pearkes, the officer who executed the search-war-
, defendant had adtrritted that the bill of parcels was rant, described his entering Blackhall's house, accom-
correct, and that the money tendered by the plaintiff panied by Sarah Gardener, Mr. Wyneh's servant ;
I was sufficient ; but stated that it was impossible for :
,and as soon as they entered a• room on the attic, she
him to perform the contract, as Messrs. Pooley and recognized the drawers as her master's. After leay.
Co..who were the proprietors of the cotton yarn. had ing the house, they went to Mrs. Morphew's, and
not forwarded it to him as he had expected. told Blackhall what they had seen : he denied the
1 Mr. Topers°, for the defendant, at first attempted drawers being Mr. Wyuch's, and said he had bought
to prove that the plaintiff-knew the name of the par.' and p lid for every thing in the house. His Wife and
titular person for whom the defendant acted in this t Mrs. Morphew came directly after into the kitchen,
case, but in this he failed ; he then contended the ; when Mrs. Morphew said, she had given the drawers
contract was sot binding by the statute of frauds, as to Blackball when they were married.
Ithere was no tonteact in writing signed by the party,' Mrs. Morphew .atteoded yesterday, and repeated
for the name of the defendantat the top of the bill i this Statement.
lof parcels being printed, could not be considered as a I ...A carpenter also attended, and stated, that about
signature ; neither was it pretended that any earnest : four years since Mrs. Morphew employed him to put
had been given, or a delivery made of any part of ' a particularly good lock on one of the drawers.
"I the gOods. Under these circumstances, Mr. Nelms did not
~.i j • The ATTORNEY GENERAL, on the other side, re- think the case sufficient against Blackball, and there-
, le
lied on the case of Saunderson v. Jackson, and ant- forei discharged him.
,a--
cher, 2d Bus. and Pul. 238, in which Lord Eldon had I HArtoN cesenee.—./enter Harrison and Joiner Mil-
,os pet this very case, in which a person's net& might be off:, the two notorious tintber4nercluintsovere brought
e of printed, and held that it would be sufficient to bring lup again yesterday for further examination, when the
aof it within the statute of frauds. two tollo.:ving fresh cases appeared against them I
cone: Lord ELLEsisottottott intimated that his opinion I • ing at No. 106, Fenchurch.street, swore, and brought Nathaniel Ponder, a carpenter and builder, resid•
;plebs coincided with that delivered by Lord Eldon ;—but ,
a forward witnessesto prove, that five pair of glazed
lati. said, he would reserve theloint, and the defendant
which.
window.sasnes.' worth upwards of 010, found in the
, might move upon it. .` .
prisoner's workshop, at N.,. 2, Back-hill, were his
The A verdict was found for the plaintiff.
property, and were fixed in the window-frames of a
ie most ' BRUCE AND CO. I'. HUNTER. dWellinglouse in which no person slept, whence they
Air, Bre. In this case plaintiffs, who are respectable mer- were stolen on the night of Saturday, the 50th of
PeneEP chants, brought their action to receiver Li 150, for October, .
b soldier, i work and labour done and money'advanced for de- Two six-pannelled doors, found by the officer: on
Lion of the leadent„ • the prisoners' premises, were sworn to, and proved to
er the ter. It appeared that plaintiffs had .effected various in- be the property of H. Leech, having been stolen out
a 1783, the sera nces and perfeimed other- services for the defen- of an uninhabited house.
I out. 'rile
dant. This was admitted on the part bf defendant, ' The parties were all bound over to proseente, and
ilk the piece. and 4'605 had been paid 'nett Court on his account. the prisoners remanded for another examination.
'PPT'',..____2'°,m_,e The only question was, whether the remaining sum, Mead: Gil,,, Samuel Clarie,and John Edwards, un-
r 4".""."'"•16- which was made up of interest on tbe debts incurre dersveat an examination, charged by James Naveney,
respect to the during several years, was-legal or not ? . of N 0.2, Woburn mews, with fraudulently conspiring
they literally Read to defraud
. him
.of
.the sum of £43. by falsely
. pretend.
_.
the'srage situ'- Alr. proved that be had delivered
. to the de-
r has displayed tenant for. several years successively, an account , hag that a certain horse, which he bought at Smith.
,y which Enrico current stating the sums in which he was' indebted to , field-market for-said sum, was free from the glanders,
,
the plaintiffs' at the end of each year the interest ofii
whereas
n far.t.the said horse was, to the knowledge.
irted. A Master the former years' debt being regularly added to the lof the said parties,ilandered. He returned the horse
:e in the character account. To this mode of charge the defendant the next day, which Edwards accepted. but refused
mitten to introduce
made no objection till 1811. to retorn him the money. The prisoners were.scom.
uncommon powers. Mr. LYTTLEDALE submitted, that this being cont. n#94411.94 . , - ...
full-toned, and his POtind. interest, it was not allowable in law. - -- . .
to'
its cadenza: are truly Lord Eeeeenonouon held. however, that as the EXTRAORMNARY FRAUD.--La ly a man 4,the.,
. ago was perfectly cha- defendant had madeno objection to the aceount for name of Thomas Pepper contrived to get aixi
. Mr. Josies and Mrs. a number of years, he'cnuld not now resist the claim with Robert Tilbury, a boy about fifteen.years of ars
delineation' el•the ri. ion the ground of unfairness. It was a matter corn- employed i 4 the "'shop of Mr. Hurst, an apothecary
ered old maid, contri-imonly admitted in mercantile transactions, where ac. the Strand; and alter a short acquaintance he toIC
d, success of the piece. 1 counts were- delivered annually of sums bearing in-
him he had got a child that was dangerously ill an
ry fine songs, but being 1 terest, that where the interest vas every year added had been told that a small quantity of calomel would '
n effort to repeat it, he 'to the account, it became a part of the debt, and do it goad ; the boy at first refused to let him have
apology—that he was so bore interest in the same manner as any part of the it, as he understood it was poisonous or dangerous
nothing but respect for the': debt otherwise contracted. stuff, but at length he persuaded the boy to let him
, him to make the attempt, Vet diet for plaintiffs—Damages 41280. have some. In a few days alter Pepper called upon
id indul the boy and told him the calomel he had let him have
gence for the pardon . PERCIVAL V. 51W.
.had done the child so much obd that it was recover-
was kindly received. This was an eition to recover £4O, the value of a g
13 horse sold to plaintiff by defendant as sound, which
of four pieces, ing, and the boy let him have, without hesitation,
• --'or to any of i proved unsound. two powders more of calomel, of three grains each.
4 About a week afterwards Pepper called upon the boy" 1
Plaintiff, it appeared, is a soap-manufacturer in again in a great rage, and said his "child was dead,
Whitechapel-road, and the defendant a horse-dealer I and that the boy had murdered it, with the calomel,
in the same neigbbourbpod. The latter sold a horse and that he would be taken up for murder and
hanged ;this insinuation and threat terrified the boy
tott/ elPe (Ten ei Watranty•of soundness. but upon
extremely, but before they parted Pepper agreed not
trig the animal appeared to have the megrim:, and
was returned to defendant. to tell Mr. Hurst, the boy's mare-, or say any thing
...
about. the business, provided he would give him three
shillings, which the boy readily agreed to. These de-
mands being repeatedly made by Pepper the boy at
length confessed the whole of the circumstances to
his master, who gave him a three shilling token to
give Pepper, which having been accomplished, La.
vender, the Bow-street officer, who was in attendance,
took Pepper into custody and conveyed him to Bow-
street office, where he was committed for trial for the
misdemeanor.

4

On the cross-examination of the witnesses produced
on the part of Ole plaintiff, it turned out that the
horse was five weeks in the possession of the plaintiff
before any complaint was made, although it was con-
tended, that the animal hall exhibited marks of its
infirmity the first day of its being taken out by his
servant.
Lord ELLENBOROUGH • did not think this evidence
of r n • ufficiently satisfactory to support the case
:. if, who was coniequirbtly nonrviled.

. -- -:
• .. , . - , .
• ' * • - . .. .. •
• AIIPIIIIMIEESVPMMIOIPIIIO VII 1
tirr IPT/111,11M L, . Olds Ws trrisl L ADlSlCAlist..eitr igut.s)..).4 :5,.. ,
ri
. . . . .. ‘ r
*Vila ad: 41*-44 imi‘JlVlllrib Ji 294111 xnisd .inv
. . . .
rac
4.01; me-, 10.:aererti., wmairrac - zoo 'CO Or CYffilltit. ,: I DIIIOIMUIL.
.. ' Isk • • . • Att
.1
r- • . . -
OMNI WO Pi .sraL '. Iniii orlon .—• • - Akio* ty. At. err 4tliht *oz. g, l!sertVi. . teu It. LAtc tr Tell eg t
voisimarit the' ' Amapa ; ilist: o ..-. iJ.
eierat2 arittrittedTe Puhritratt a !?....er colO!•1, tg
~ 1 :xima Witn yittoos far
thy ants allow td f et‘wg some old'lower-WMfpeneisind'ittbers,":bad
couneadint.. pi ". • • . ltsillOvrotir• .1
Sir Into+ full* ' i 4: • ' -i- . s rs.- • , flitatd, beites*id4ncelle iptOre the it ..,,e+V et Giles?. ' The snorer tarsisaaj.seaVliss 4406 M*
1.42044.16/LatiVel -! •it; . : s•ii . " tilictspost. plaintiff. fireumbiptitfes sate.— reputed fa- pal tolas they chantesiwTharcitliat.ek..9arlinsialt on
-4-tit =Aided , . •,; 4
~
~,„1
.tartimcLoi.
dm.' of the plaintiff; a stair -mason in Gray'a-Inu- ihja sghiect makeisotAp— perativciin the case of articles
_... _ . .
• : WILLImn* !if*, died peasessed of property to a [er amount.— pleased, or ;nave on.: tithe; ude .to be grien,
Mlu Poor Artlf*l • - ..,. DATE NtORT. The defendants,. the brother-indas! and. sister of the lun - the valve Of's:peace-. that old rower halfpence
Miss Buss Arundel , • • 'Miss Coast. deceased, took out letters of administration, as if the 1, :hairnet le e Oled,- under the penalty of Five Pountis