Star.
London, England, 1830-08-16 00:00:00

THE MARSEILLOISE HYMN.

This celebrated Hymn is now for the first time, since the fall of
Robespierre, in 1794, permitted to be sung publicly in all parts of
France ; and its author, M. Rouget Deslisle, has had a pension of
16,00 f. conferred on him by the patriotic Sovereign who has just
succeeded the weak and infatuated Charles X. We subjoin a copy
of it, as it was sung by the French troops in 1792. It received
its name from being set to the march struck up by the band of mu-
sic, which accompanied the Marseilloise Deputies as they entered
the Champ de Mu rs, at the Grand Confederation of the French
people on the 4th July, 1890:
Allons, enfans de is patrie,
Le jour de gloire at arrive ;
Contre noun, de la tyrannie
L'etendart sanglant at eleve,—
L'etendart sanglant at elev.
Entendez-vous, dans les campagnes,
Rugir txs feroces soklats ;
IL viennent jusques dans vos bras,
Eg°l7roe Ms, vos compagnes.
: armee, Citoyens,
Forme: yes battalions;
Marches, Marches,
Q'un sang impur
Abreuve nos sillone.
Que vent cet horde d'eselaves.
De traits, de Rois conjurtss ?
Pour qui ces ignobles entraves,
Ces fern des long temps prepares
Ces fere des long temps Timpanist
Prongs, pour nous, ah I quel outrage!
Quels transports it doit exciter !
C'est nous qu'on ose niediter
De render a l'antique esclavage.
Aux armee, &c.
Amour saai de la park,
Conduit, souuens nos bras vengeurs ;
Libertk, Liberti ! cheek,
Combats avec to &kneeing.
Combats avec to defenseure.
Sous nos drapeaux quo la victoir•
Aecouse a to males accents ;
Que les ennemis expirants,
Voleat too triomph et is glare.
Aux armee, &c.
None macrons dans Is =Mere,
Qusad nos sin& n'y seront plus;
Now y trouvrrons leur poussiere,
Et l'exemple de leurs versus.
Et l'exemple tie !curs versus.
Bien awing jaloux de leur aurvivre,
Que de portages leur cercuell ;
Nous auront le sublime argued,
De lee venge.r, ou de les suivre.
Aux acmes, Citoyens, &c.

Sam Aar the publication of the above production in France,
the following Verses to the same air, were popularly sung in Lng.
land. The name of their author has escaped our remembrance.
Ye sons of France, awake to glory,
Hark ! Hark I what myriads bid you rise ;
Your children, wives, and grandsires hoary—
Behold their tears, and hear their cr!es !
Shall hateful tyrants, mischief breeding,
With hireling hems, a ruffian band,
Affright and desolate the land,
Where peace and liberty lie bleeding.
To arms, to arms, ye brave,
The avenging sword unaheath,
March an March on, all hearts resolved
On Victory or Death.
Now, now, the dangerous storm is rolling,
Which treacherous kiags confederate raise
The dogs of war let loose, are howling,
Aod, lo ! our fields and cities blase ;
And shall we basely view the ruin,
While lawless form, with guilty stride,
breads desolation far and wide,
With crimes and blood his hands embruing,
To arms, ye brave, Ite.
With luxury and pride surrounded,
The vile, insatiate despots dare ;
Their thirst of power and gold unbounded,
To mete and vend the light of sir.
Like beasts of burden would they load us,
Like gods would bid their sieves adore,
is Hut man is man, and who is more ?
Then shall they longer lash and goad us ?
To arms, ye brave, &c.
0, Liberty, can man resign thee,
Once having felt thy ieneroua lame?
Can dungeons, hobo'. and bars confine thee,
Or whips thy noblc spirit tame
Too long the world hath wept. b..t.alling
That filielioters dagger tyrants wield,
Hut freedom is our sword and shield,
And all their arts are unavailing,
To arms, ye brave, tc.

-.-.. mi••••••

iA

.i

•

1 -
s% LAW RRPORTS.
'CELLAR'S COURT, Auo. 14.
sztikiez CUM.—RANKIN V. RUIRISSON.
.Hls Honour Owl/ICE-CHANCELLOR gave judgment this mom-
. :ng in this care; which was an application on the part of the members
of the Unite Service Club. for an injunction to restrain the Commie-
sirnerti Of Woods and Forests, the Right Hon Wm. Huskisson and
Sir Robert Lawler, from building stables. ee.c. on land to which the
i'lub contended they were entitled, by the agreement entered into
with them by Mr. Numb, on the part of the Commissioners of Wood'
and Forests, to retain as a garden in front of the magnificent struc-
ture which they have erected on part of the site of Carlton House.—
fly the affidavits in the cause it appeared that in February, 1826,
application was made by the noblemen and gentlemen composing the
('nited Service Club to the Commissioners of Woods and Forests
:or a plot of ground, for the purpose of building their Club-house.
The original proposal was for a piece of ground, of certain &men-
! ions. The Club not thinking the first sufficient, applied fir a fur.
:her piece, which was granted to the extent of 18 feet. Upon the
&lark a question was raised, whether there was originally an
. greement for the ground that was first proposed to be taken, and
afterwards. an agreement for the second plot of ground, or whether
the matter merely rested in proposal until there was one final agree-
lient made for the whole ? fly the affidavit of Mr. Nash, it did not
.listinetly appear what was his understanding upon the subject, the
Ittatter, therefore, was left in doubt ; but it most distinctly
appeared from the affidavit, that there was a plan made out
yr which it appeared that the club were to have a clear front-
age to the south, looking over the whole of the vacant space
•alled the garden. It was quite clear from all the affidavits
-.ken together, though some of the letters which had passed between
the parties raised a question on the fact whether there were more
plans than one, in point of fact that there was but one plan, and by
that plan it was clear that for the whole of the original p
piece of ground there should be an open front to the south. His
Honour thought upon the affidavit a question might be raised, ao
to what was the mutual understanding between the parties. And
upon the whole of the counts named it was perfectly plain that the
United Service Club must be considered as having contracted to
take the original piece of ground, with a clear frontage towards the
south ;- there was, therefore, no doubt that as to the thirteen feet
encroachment, the present building could not be permited to
nand. The next question was as to the eighteen feet, the piece
of ground last taken by the Club. The Court thought, taking
into consideration the affidavit of Lord Grantham, Gen. Rowan,
and Gen. Brown, that that part was taken with an understand-
ing that it should also have, as well as the plot of ground pit.
viously granted, an open frontage to the south. These gentle
men, in their affidavits, stated most positively that in every plan
shown to them by Mr. Nub, the frontage to the south wan
open. It was true, however, that Mr. Nash, in his affidavit,
totally denied this, and stated that it was never his intwitim
that the agreement entered into should preclude the Camila.
sioners of Woods and Forests from building on the land as dig
had done. The intentions, however, of Mr. Nash were not sull.
tient. The Court, therefore, upon the whole was of opinion that
the Commissioners of Woods and Forests were not instilled la
erecting any building; therefore the injunction must go to am
train the continuance of these buildings, and against the cawids.
lion of that which was begun.—lnjunction granted.
This was the last day of his Honour's sittings.

~ :. i

,

found the note concealed in the lining of her stays. Sentence of
Death recorded.
The Grand Jury have ignored the bill against John M'Pher-
son, a schoolmaster, committed by the Lord Mayor, and brought
from Newgate by habeas, charged with forging a bill of exchange
for 751.
NISI PRIUS COURT.
LIBEL.—JARRETT V. CHORLEV.
This was an action for libel.
Mr. Sergeant Arrnitzws stated the case for the plaintiff, whom
he described as a respectable merchant, carrying on business under
the firm of Jarrett and Tadman, No. 19, Yenchurch.atreet, London,
and having a private residence in Grenada-place, Kent-road. The
defendant was also a merchant, carrying on business on Dowgate-
hill, and between him and the plaintiff several dealings had taken
place. From some peculiar circumstances, however, the latter was
led to suppose that he had fallen in with a person who was using
him unfairly. A large balance was due from defendant to plaintiff,
an account of which was forwarded to defendant. who returned no
answer to the letter inclosing it, and in a few days afterwards the
plaintiff was surprised at seeing a placard, of which the following
is a copy, stuck about the streets.
" Fifty Pounds Reward.—Whereas James Jarrett, of the firm
of Jarrett and Tadman, of No. 19, Fenchurch.street, and of No.
11, Grenada-place, Old Kent-road, has absconded with warrants on
die London Dock Company, for wines to a considerable amount,
entrusted to his care.
" Whosoever will give information to Mr. Chorley, No. 31,
Dowgate hill, so that he may be apprehended, shall, on conviction,
receive the above reward. The said James Jarrett is about 40
years of age, fair complexion, light eyes, about five feet seven inches
high, and rather inclined to be stout."
Particular pains were taken to have this placard posted, not only
near the plaintiff's counting-house; but also about the neighbour-
hood of his private residence; now there was no pretence for saying
that the plaintiff had absconded with any wine-warrants, or that he
had absconded at all—ao far from that being the case, he was at
the time in correspondence with his friends as usual. Defendant,
on being applied to on the subject of the placard, refused to give
any explanadon ; and the plaintiff then went before the Lord Mayor,
in order that if there was any ground for accusing him of felony,
the charge might be made, but defendant (who had; received
notice of plaintiff's Intention,) never made his appearance ; plain-
tiff, of course, could not suffer the matter to rest then, and accor-
dingly brought the present action. What defence was intended
to be set up he (Mr. Sergeant Andrews) was at a loss to know,
no justification being put upon record. The defendant had
merely pleaded the general issue. The necessary proofs would be
given to connect the defendant with the circulation of the placards.
The Learned Counsel then called,
Davis, who stated that he received orders from a person named
White, to print 200 copies of the placard, with directions that they
should be sent to the defendant's house on Dowgate-hill—they were
printed, and sent there accordingly.
James Bowtrigbt, clerk to plaintiff, proved having seen the pla-
card stuck about, and that there had been certain dealings between
plaintiff and defendant. He called on defendant to request he
would desist from placarding the bills. Defendant said he would
continue to publich them, if it cost him 500 L Defendant had been
sending to plaintiff for some wine-warrants, and insisted upon it
that he would have either the warrants or plaintiff.
This was the plaintiff's case.
Mr. CuRNEY addressed the jury for the defendant.
Lord TENTERDEN said, the publication having been proved, the
plaintiff was clearly entitled to a verdict.
--41.--. Verdict for the plaintiff, damages 40s.
OXFORD ClRCUlT.—Heaxeonn, Ann. 13. This was the only case of any interest in the Nisi Fetus Court.
The Judges arrived in this city last night, and opened the atm
mission. This morning their Lordships attended divine service at WARWICK, Auo. 13.
the Cathedral. and afterwards commenced the business of the Assize, CROWN SlDE.—(Before Mr. Justice OaSELEE.)
a hich is unusually light, there being only seven causes entered for Matilda Snide was indicted for having, on the 6th of July last,
trial, and but one Special Jury, which is an action of ejectment. at Birmingham, feloniously paid and put off to Abraham Levy, 23
pieces of counterfeit and milled money, made to the likeness of half.
The calendar is also exceedingly light, and contains the names
sovereigns, and 72 pieces of counterfeit money, made to the likeness
of only twenty-one prisoners for the county, and two for the city.
of halt-crowns, at and for a lower rate and value than by their de.
The following is a summary of the offences with which they are
nomination they imported. In this case it appeared that a Jew
charged s—Forgery, two ; horse-stealing, one ; burglary, one; from London, named Levy, who with his wife was employed by
housebreaking, seven ; sheep-stealing, one ; manslaughter, one;
the officers of the Mint to detect offenders of this description, hay.
stealing in a dwelling-house above the value of 51. one ; and larceny,
In g procured an introduction to the prisoner, met her at a public.
eine. It is a remarlcabable circumstance, that when orders were
house, and proposed to purchase some counterteit coin of her. The
given for the printing of the calendar, there were only three pri-
ceerisoner undertook to furnish the coin, and the price, &c. having
toners committed ; whilst it was at the printer's twenty were com-
mitted for trial, and since it has been printed, there have been eight n agreed upon, she promised to meet him again in three or
four hours with 101. worth of half.sovereigns and half-crowns.
more committed ; so that the total number for trial at the Assizes
For the former, which, in the slang dialect of these people, are
i. thirty-one. called caw"and for the
It appears that out of 87 prisoners confined in the gaol under , she wal to receive 4s. 6d• a piece;
latter (which are called tesharoons) she was to have Os. a dozen.
various terms of imprisonment, 21 can read and write, 18 can read
The bargain was made at six o'clock in the evening; and half-
only, and 48 can neither read nor Write.
After the Grand Jury had been sworn, past ten was the hour appointed fur Levy and the prisoner
to meet again. In the interim, the latter having communicated
Mr. Justice BOTANQUET addressed them at considetable length.
with the police, the necessary arrangements were made for the daft.
His lordship observed it was a source of great satisfaction that the
Lion and apprehension of the prisoner. Levy was searched to ascer-
calendar was neither numerous, nor presented any case of aggrava-
lain that he had no bad money about him, and 51. marked good
tion. It was also with much pleasure he observed that the proper.
money was given to him to make the purchase. He met the pd.
tion of juvenile offenders was much less than on former occasions, loner at the same public-house at the appointed hour, and was con.
both in this county and the other counties of the circuit through
ducted by him to another house at a short distance. Here she pulled
which he bad passed. There did not appear a single committal
out a bundle from beneath her shawl, containing the counterfeit
under the age of 14. There was certainly one of that age, and
money, and Levy purchased 51. worth of it from her, saying that he
another of the age of 15, and in neither case could they read or
thennot money enouth at present to purchase the remainder. He
write. Although no strong argument could be drawn from this
went out of house,
the ou and gave a signal to the police officers
solitary fact, yet it was a circumstance that ought not to be over-
looked, and he sincerely trusted, that those who, by their Faunal who were in waiting' They immediately pursued and apprehended
theyvisonalwto had left the house as soon as Levy, and was
exertions, or pecuniary means, had contributed to the instruction of
letting OUT of the way with all convenient speed. On searching
youth, would continue their laudable exertions, as it was the surest, they at first only found a part of the money which Levy had
mode of inculcating morality and sound religion, and the best an-
but observing that one of her cheeks
tidote to crime. His Lordship then made several observations on given her on her
ktrojetted, they told her she had something in her mouth.—
the cases in the calendar, after which the Grand Jug retired.
e said she had not, but that her face was swelled. At
The business is extremely light ; it is eipected that it will be S.II
ute same moment she made an attempt to swallow what was
disposed of by Saturday night, and the commission does not open
in her month ; but one of the officers prevented her, by seizing her
at Monmouth until Wednesday. by the throat, and bending her head forward, forced a paper parcel
GUILDFORD ASSIZES, AUG. 14. out of it, containing three sovereigns and a half, of the marked
Mary Ann Warner was indicted for unlawfully disposing of the money, which the informer had given her for the counterfeit coin.
dead boy of a female child, to which she had given birth, and also She no longer made any attempt to deny terilt, observ"ing, that
for endeavouring to conceal the birth thereof. thenceforth she knew she might consider " ballast. la this
Mrs. Lucy Stedwell stated that she resided at Richmond, and point her anticipations proved perfectly correct; for the jury re-
that the prisoner had been in her service. Witness in the month of turning a verdict of guilty, she was sentenced by his Lordship to be
June last, suspected that the prisoner was pregnant, and informed transported for life.
her of her suspicions. The prisoner denied it. In the night of the 26th She treated the matter eere, lightly all through the trial, occa.
of June, in consequence of a noise she heard, she went into the pri. tonally smiling at some of the dem& of the evidence, and merely
sonees room, and found her sitting in a chair by the side of her bed, stated in her defence that she bad been sold, but that the informer
undressed. She taxed the prisoner with having delivered herself of was an infinitely worse character than herself. Upon receiving sea-
a child, but she denied it. Witness was satisfied from appearances tence, she replied," Thaneitriou my Lord; I shall drink your health
that her suspicions were well founded, and, en examining the pri- in water, for I suppose I get nothing stronger."
soner's bed, found the dead body of a child concealed between
Luke Riddell and Richard Short were indicted foe a misde-
the mattress and the sacking of the bed. It was quite warm, meanour, in having, on the 25th of June last, at Aston, near Bir.
and had evidently been recently born. Witness then sent fora . •
mmgham unlawfully procured 987 counterfeit sovereigns, 1,913
surgeon. 393 counterfeit half crowns, and 3.098
Mr. Thomas Blair Anderson, a surgeon, stated that he was sent anulterfell half
shilling, eerereie•
fir to attend the prisoner, and, on examination, found that she had counterfeit
. with intent t° circulate the same amongst the
recently been delivered of a child. King's liege subjects. The police, having reason to suspect the pri.
sours, took measures for their detection, and succeeded in appre-
This closed the case for the prosecution. bending
ich them laden with the above quantity of counterfeit money,
The Jury returned a verdict of Guilty, but strongly recommended was contained in two bags. The sovereigns were in blank
the prisoner to mercy, in which recommendation her mistress cor- (not yet stamped ;) but the other pieces were complete. They were
dially joined. not, however, by any means, good imitations ; but it was stated that
She was sentenced to 14 days' imprisonment-
they
Charles Sims was indicted for stealing, in the dwelling-house 'Were intended far circulation lo Ireland, where ere th le lent dif•
ficulty in putting them away.
of Thomas Wilson Robinson, a silver watch and other articles, The ners were
p rfso convicted, and sentenced to be impri.
value 161. sued for two years.
The prisoner was formerly in the service of the tor but
Same um :K Heaton was indicted for stealing a half-sovereign,
absconded on the 15th December, 1828, taking with
the pro. four half wns, and other monies, from the person of William
perty named in the indictment, The prosecutor saw no more of Hollins, at Birmingham, on the 26thof last. The 1
July t. proareu-
him until the 27th April last, when he accidentally met him in the tor. i. roma,
ye
day,autteny:lhediehthLpuFbreelicetireStime ldmadateßehmleeingheamed
Borough, and gave him in charge to a police officer. The property onthe' held
has not since been found. popular speech. The prosecutor, to protect himself from plunder
The prisoner, in his defence, said that he was sent out by his by pickpockets, of whom a great were observed in thecrowd,
master, and stayed longer thsn'he ought to have done, and feari kept his band in his breeches pocket where his •
money was, until his
that his master would blow him up, he did not return. He denied feelings being powerfully operated by the honourable
uponbaronet's
all knowledge of the robbery. eloquence, he was betrayal into a fit of enthusiasm, and taking his
Verdict Guilty. Sentence of death was minded. hand from his pocket he grasped his hat with it, and waving it
George Arnett Robinson, a medical student, was indicted for over his head. shouted and huzzaed for Sir Francis. The
prisoner
stealing a musical snuff-box, the property of Leonard Ledward. availed himself of that unguarded moment to pick the prosecutor's
Ann Ledward stated, that she resided at Lambeth. The prisoner het.
was a student at Guy's Hospital, and lodged with her for a consider- "lie was found Guilty, and sentenced to fourteen year's trans-
able time. He left her in April, and in a few days afterwards called Donation.
and asked to borrow a razor. She told him be would find one in her r-- SATURDAY; AUG. 14.
husband's room. He went and fetched it, and soon after left the
house. When he *as gone, she missed a musical snuff-box from CIVIL SlDE.—Before the LORD Clem. Benoit and a Special
Jury.
the antlepiece. m
Cross-examined by Mi. Clarkson.—She knew the prisoner's OtillINSI V. CRIDLow.
connections were of the highest respectability. She did not believe This wait an action brought by the plaintiff, a banker, at Binning-
be meant to steal the box, but to raise some money on it, he being ham, and Member of the Society of Friends, against the defendant, as
in great distress at the dine, and to return it as soon as he could printer of a monthly periodical called the Argus, which is p"' ad
redeem it. in that town, for a series of libels reflecting on the plaintiff's chimera
Golding, a pawnbroker, produced the snuff box, which he Mr. Damian, Mr. Serjeant doulbuth, and Mr. Hill, conducted the
stated had been pledged with him by the prisoner for 14s. on the plaintiffs' ease, and MT. Williams and Mr. Waddington, the
24th of April. defence. It may be recollected that the plaintiff brought a si.
Blackman, an officer, proved the apprehension of the prisoner. miler talon against a person of the name of Manuel, which
The prisoner declined saying anything in his defence. was tried at the last spring assizes for this county. A series
Mr. Baron Outflow summed tip the evidence, observing, that of libels were read front the work in question, on that occasion,
the Jury must be satisfied that the prisoner intended to steal the which imputed fraudulentconduct generally to the,plaintlff, and par.
box at the time he took it, before they could convict him. Ver. 1 'latterly with reference to a policy of insurance effected on the life
diet—Not Guilty. of his mother, who died shortly after the policy was effected. No
Wirtiam Marshall, Edmund Shormonds, and Richard Marshall, justification•was pleaded, and the work having been proved to have
were convicted of breaking into an outhouse belonging to Peter j bete sold by Manse!, who is a stationer and bookseller, the jury re.
H unter. Esq. at Fetcham, and stealing eighteen fowls and a gun.; turned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 1001. On the present
They were each sentenced to be transported for life. The mimosas ' occasion the action was brought to recover damages for the publics.
were part of a desperate gang of thieves that have long infested that don of the same series of libels by the defendant, who, as before
neighbourhood. I silted, is the printer of the work. Mr. Denman having eonnuented
Eliza Brown was es holly convicted of stealing a 101. note in the in strong language upon the nature of the aspersions from which the
dwelling-house of Catherine Thornton, the repay of William plaintiff sought by this proceeding to vindicate his character,
Sutton. The prosecutor accompanied the prisoner to a bones Mr. WILLIAMS contended, in his address to the Jury, that Mr.
of a certain description in Lambeth. and was there robbed of a ' Gibbing having already effected his object, by obtaining a verdict
101. note. He sent for an officer, who, on search* tbe prisoner, , with large damages, against another defendant for the publication

of the same libel. ought to have been satisfied with that, and was
not entitled, on the present occasion, to more than nominal damages.
The jury, after having retired for some 'time, came into Court,
and asked the Chief Baron if they were to give damages by way of
punishment against the defendant, or by way of compensation to
the plaintiff: and if, in the latter case, they were to take the da-
mages given in the former action into consideration ? His lordship
informed them, that they were not t punish but to compensate, and
that they ought not to take any notice of what had taken place in
another action.
The jury, after having retired for a short time, returned a verdict
for the plaintiff—Damages 1501.