Star.
London, England, 1822-10-08 00:00:00

‘.v

WW

j

_-, '0

.‘t

o .3.“
aﬂ«,.no

.'.\'

‘_ :roucz lanthanum... .‘
1:?“ t“. ’. .|..: ; .....,,‘3t..'f.;u 71‘3"?!
2 . on: K 3 -‘ ~.. ‘l. ‘7 M“w
m‘ {"5“ a: . j til . M
”a endure hotel-nu ooh .t-
-.heplseo‘ anal-hurt“!!! ”a , ; I)";
tonnage-p andsetllﬂgdowrrfaluwDQWm .
thanthosstheyworewxﬂﬁm‘ ~. " - ‘
1 ”Warner _ , , 86.841.
(watbporaoaMﬂtWeﬂse. . 'u‘h'“
LudheavldatlonofthadﬂM-thﬂh‘ \
1 nu. Bonn attended Wmﬁemﬁeaehaéo
iWeCMC. roprletors. q Aiouuor and In Antonino
Moan Euﬁram,wadmwmnﬁ
nude“... at ca. sump WW 9‘
‘ Mr. Ben My stat'edthe carrot them which
khan iubmugltnﬂler the Aetofthe’lttol'Geo. 1.. («the
regulation at WMwh w “2"“ “Nat“ "°
[persuahonldpresometoound or ply forhioe “WWW
‘ofmol'nﬂty. wlth “Lhacho'ey-eosth or other yehlele. withoot
being duly licensed y the Commit-lulu! ofthe haehueyu
Imm, under a penalty of £5. 'l'he-ehorge against thedofend.
ant was. that he had presumed to ply for hire\'ltiout being
leensediangeonzlncdoa wed.“ upon”! thgobove-neo-
tioued er not nrepeal . - n ’
'De evidenee'ottwo hsekney-oooeh owners. who deposed to
the above stated elfeet, and that the defendant had plyed than
‘the Banh‘t‘or hire. to goto‘ Candenor Wren. and by
ply-log obtained seven pauengert,,wa'o then read over. ' The «W
""‘..°‘..,“,......"M “ "' ”ﬁr"? s32“;th ”11.1%?
to’ rs front not to n
1 and that for that privilege be paid to the guanine!" 20. (66.?
loath journey, s tax of £lO per-annular whcldaty. and a tax of}
I‘ll. do. for eaehcoochman, besidet the license dnty. , |
After hearing Counsel, the Losn.MAlron,eo'poulted with Mr. ‘
nobler, the thief alerh, and the Qty Solicitor. after whleh he}
announced that be considered the practice of the defendant legal.
the section of the Act cited having been repealed by subsequent;
Ann—The deeialon of eonrtooconﬁnna theright ofthe short
stageotoply for passengers. , . V y 1
Guaranty—The sweepings of ‘goldsmiths' and jewellers'
wwhahopo, contalning small particles of v‘arlous‘valnable metals.
it is the practice to 'colleet together and melt the metallic con-
tents into what is technically eslleda chiller, which “ere from
what is called an lngot only in shape. mis subsequently sold
to the reboots, who, estimate its value bythe assay. Some of
the most reopeetsbls reﬁners have lately altoovered that the‘eon-
tentapf the ohillets have. in se'va'al instances, turned out to be of
eonaiderahly lees value than had appeared bytbe assay. The
trlch practised focusedtho snbjeetofaeasewhlehoccnrredyes.
tertlsy at this (ﬁne, before Slr Casino Frown, the sitting
Matt-mu— , ' .
A young man of respectable appearance, who you his name
Valli- Eaton. and on whose'behnlt‘ h Solicitor attended; was
charged by Mr. Brown, of the ﬁrm of Brown and Belnd, re-
ﬂnera. Wood-area, Cbaopaide, for an. attempted fraud.
The prisoner, he stated. had frequently brought them metal
for sale. 0n the 88th of September he came so nsual‘wltb a
skillet, for them to make what is terthed a partlrg one; of ‘lt to
hnowltsvalue. Nowasgenerallydonebytahng asnlall
pheefroln onoofthe corners, from theaasayot'whlchlhewhole
mate was-valued. ~ It happened. however. in this instance, that
theploce forthealay wascutout nfoneoftbe sides, and con-
talned so triﬂing a portion of valuable metal, as not to be worth
more‘than‘ 20d. an ounce. When thrpriaoutr called to huow
the reenlt,heen;essed ranch surprbeatthennallvaluesetupon
theeontentsd' shillet.audsaidthatheunderstnodlttobe
worth stleost ﬁt. an ounce. This led to a more minute in-
spection o! the ablllet,.whld_l was found to be made up for the
express purpose of fraud and deception. The interlor of the
nuns was of little or aovaloeplewaa generally coated with
metal somewhat more valuable. autumn corners from whence
the part tobe assayed was expected to betahen, pieces containing
particles of gold were neatly soldered on. and‘bad the asaa been
made from one of these corners. the whole skillet wool; have
been valued at 251. an ounce. ~ ‘ .
Messrs. Brown and Cohad been deedvedinthisway several'
tinnehefore, andthey believed in metal purchased from the prlo
sooer. 'Uley had, however. no part ofthlaho produce; and; nor
fortunately, in the piece!!! lnotauee, the fraud Wnoteouqilted,
at nornoney hadbeen pold to Baton- 9:9. v 2.21" ’i'w l.‘ :.'~.'l
Mr. Bette, jun. of Long-ante. pmdnotdrlj Q'Atlmllanklnthl
which had been purchased at their house to!!! the priennertand
for which he had received the,estimated value. 1%: m‘o‘ney‘ hadff
however, been paid, not'by hliti. but by hii-broﬁrgwho waa at
pretentagreatdlstaneefromtown. .2‘: . : ‘
As this transaction toohplaco' tn the. county, the Aldeman.‘
ovenif the evidencehadbenpnoeahcwld when when so:-
nlzm ofit. 'lheprlaouerwastherefore‘dio'eharged,‘ with a re»
commendation from the Alderman that he should be taken di-'
rectly before a Magistrate of the eou’nty. Thirltwas stint pros
med to do, but as theneoesoary evidenWhina in .Mr.
ta's eose could not be conveniently procured the someweeha.
hewasultirnately permitted to go at let‘s‘ Theoﬂeera. how.
ever, say they hpow where to ﬁnd him. he‘will therefore yet
probably not escape puahljmenn' K. "" I“ ‘ ' . -
Bowman—A summon-en me before the Ma.
girtrates to snawer‘theeotnphlntof a t in theOnards.
'lheaerjeantuatedthathowasoahlsrnarehlneommandof
ammtofelght nee. {rut Kmart-bridge Ben-ache» the
loyal News. in order“ ester-ta party of prisonersto Chat-
’hana; andaathedenchmentwaletoodng'Cocbpur-meet; the
eoachman drove hls eoaeh in among them, so a'ato operate the
‘front from the w; and upon hlzthetmhimm dutbnhint
‘foroodolng.he averygroasep to ,repeo y.
w . The eosebman, in hiedefence, solemnly 'eﬂnned that he
nevernndauseofthltgrlthetatall. It waanotlihelgjtesald,
thatbeshouldhave mebanexpiresalonwhenhe agen-
tlnanandtwoladleo‘ninggoach; andhhe magnum»
tratetopootponetheq . oraew ys.to e an.
portnnltyofhrlngin‘thesepersoatforwardaswitnessea.‘ op-
(“The Magistrate (Hr. mulddthe ofenc‘e hﬂdbeen and»
. orlly prov upon ‘ s the serjeant corporal.
f‘Asoldler,”obset-ved his Worship. “especially whilst on
duty. isageatleslen, and he shallbetteatedassueh.” He then
ﬁnedthe coach-tan twining, underthe Hackney Coach
1:324 for f' abusive language,” and in defaultof payment, he was
"P. . ’ . ’
'hlerétofore, we believe, the'Aet haabeen construed to ex-
tend to abnalvelanguaptoafononly. .

" MAgumgmnm.—Ye¢euh ambetablelooklng being.
an} mero'ugu up by Kl: wife, who charged him
via maniac; every mmukuponhq, ~
. She tutelage the defendant wuofeubh‘ "bubbly Indo-
kntdlspoultlonththeeoﬂdnotbepmaﬂedupon aentoworkl
otdoenyehhgforhbwlfo Ind family; hemdmnllyinmto‘
apanc-houe.“ miter m lanolin; Bb., byvety
(tel! amino, had In laying: ml of competence.
andalloded him something out of it forhiuu‘pponmu! the tO-
- hemadeforhef kindneu wu uneven Mgvhenlnd
whemerhecoqld meetwhh hen, Only mean: weight:
th-Wtdmmhthg 10f"? "
was seen u nuedud ﬁkhy‘ never; end GI .3034”: “'1"!
a usual “tempted to mull end ill-treat)“. IN ‘u' “'5“
{fl-1“" hunk} clam, :oth mem and:
remnant. ~
. nedemqundd.mkhtWhhwifoz
bmwaodmdmuwbin‘okﬂmwnmw-
mm,muumdhdmo§mr¢¢d~d.mmw ‘
_ LAXWMPYM’M-m" '7”. b 7:
wmﬁmgmmwmwdeeba. mew-aid
herhﬁm-dmcmdy'ﬂl-WSMLM Ib- now-ht:
mud. «in. m- manna-Img“. new
mwmmw.p¢smudﬂwmwmofhw
helmet-If.- mﬁewmc-ﬁ whim“
the .u In, being am by he: at lor
aanmmexhﬁbhednpck aﬁhuchoyes, md
m. u. Mbemd vuldotted mood. Then Injuries in
MMMI'UN we who [cumulus with. One of a.
M“Mh,m¢ot§opm«‘smnwdqjmhmkd
Nu the". with} We In his halid‘wm he said he'hdto ch:
‘uwﬂe’nWQC-rmwuuiethh‘dgoodi -'

,A'unm‘m-It 'may not he genefa‘ﬂy‘ own, but it
fag, am alfpey'sbmidiuggﬁi ovmehlngn
AIL; ', vigd whén' tenth a"' gnpaid, be-
come '_ a. for"th'e ﬁydgntbfﬂéhmﬁni . . '
'Qaﬂ: chemﬁto’cgrfyguw it! liable 4014
‘of 935136“ 'm‘uk,‘and ' e'f'd idn’g‘EHble upbh‘
mile when rdurnihg; 'as’ﬁﬁfua’k- hen going,
any place, provided they can, manger: '