Star.
London, England, 1830-09-30 00:00:00

CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES, BErr. 28.

M. Larivez.—The order of the day is the continuation of the
discussion concerning the report of the commission of accusation.
The totality of the Chamber amounts to 341 members i 80 have
ceased to form a part of it, either on account of double elections, or
in consequence of the annulling of their elections, or, in floe, from
different other reasons. The majority of the Chamber is therefore
172, and the whole assembly of more than 172 members.
The Chamber of Deputies accuses of high treason M. de Peyronnet,
one of the ex. Ministers who signed the ordinances of the 25th of July :
ist,....For having taken advantage of his authority to falsify the
elections, and deprive the citizens of the free exercise of their civic
rights.
M. Boisbertrand—Oentlemen, you have already listened with atten-
tion to the words of one of my hon. friends In favour of one of the
ex. Ministers. lie has effected what I intended to do i for I elm had to
fulfil the duties of friendship towards a man who is generally esteemed
by those who know him. (Murmurs from the left.) The orates does

not pretend to do away die aversimisatertainsd against*, ex-Ministers s
such an attempt would indeed be presumptuous, and, like my boa
friend M. Bettye', 1 have to fear that my voice will appear suspicious
in this assembly (oh ! ho !) but I should ever feel the sdop of coo-
science were I not to declare, at this aided moment, that M. de Pay.
rennet, on ',Appearing on the political ow, told me that his
formal intendon was to govern according to the laws, and to respect
all the public liberties. Till the fatal days of July bay %Icy
was constantly the same, and I can only explain his fatal to
the acts of the Stbth of July, by attribudft it to the noble firmness of a
generous mind, who hazards all not to appear under the thtaldem
of fear.

the accusations of your commission, there at Val) three
apinsAreirde Peyronnet. Allow me to answer them in a words.
The bon. reporter has observed the coincidence between the sending
of the Ittlemelooes, and the dissolution of the Chambers,—a wind-
dance which seems to denote a reel snare laid for the deputies of France.
I shall not examine whether it is proper to account for inferences, but I
entreat you to consider whether it would not have been easier and less
dangerous to arrest each deputy at home, than in the midst of the ca.'
pital, in presence of a formidable population, and under the eyes of a
powerful body, ready to assemble to anathematize the imprudent man
who would thus have violated the most precious of its priv
The second accusation speaks of the projects of law presented to the
Chambers by M. Peyronnet. A project of law is not a fact as long as
it has not been sanctioned by the legislative body, and human justice
only punishes facts, not thoughts, nor projects. Therefore, if a project
of law is not adopted, it is really nothing, at least before justice. If it
is sanctioned by the Chamber, it becomes their work.
In regard to the destitution, effected at the moment of the elections,
one day, perhaps, we may have the right to judge actions of each a na-
ture with seventy; in such matters all depends on the opinions
ly manifested (murmurs) ; the total independence of the functionariesal
may become a political doctrines but this doaine cannot yet be much
respected amongst us, and the present Government would, perhaps, be
indeed imprudent were it to consider the faculty of dismissing the pub.
lie functionaries as attacking the constitutional rights.
The deputies then to vote; the left and the centres voted
for the accusation. bout lb members of the right voted against the
accusation.

The President then read the second paragraph, which was as fol-
lows:

" For having violently changed the institutions of the kingdom."_
Adopted without discussion.
• " 3tl,—For having conspired against the internal security of the
suss."—.Adopted.
" 4th,—For having excited civil war by arming the citizens against
each other, and given rise to the devastation of the capital and some of
the provinces."—Adopted.
Totality of the members - 280
For the Accusation . - 232
Against . • i• • be
_ _

The Chamber accuses M. de Pyronnet of high treason, sad Impeaches
him before the Chamber of Peers.

The same accusation is against M. de Chantelame.
31. Tardy, elected by same department as M. de Chantelause,
maintained that it was impossible for his colleague to be treacherous to
his country. A criminal is culpable from his intentions alone, and Pro-
vidence always allows those intentions to be manifested. Ambition is
in general the sole cause of political crimes, and the only occupation of
M. de Chantelause was to fulfil the duties of a father and a husband.
"I know very well," continued the orator, "that he drew upthe report
that caused the ordinances; but it is also known that he did it from
notes which were communicated to him. The 14th article deceived the
Ministers, and the interpretation of that article was fatal to M. de Chan.
telauze •' but no one will maintain that error is treachery."
M. de Leyval spoke in favour of M. de Chantelause, and declared
that he had heard him say that our institutions were absolutely neces.
sary to the country ; and the greatest misfortune for him would be to
become a member of any ministry. The speaker represented 31. de
Chantelause struggling against his fatal destiny during the months which
preceded his nomination.
N. de Tracy praised the intentions of those who had just spoken, but
he said that it was impossible to forget that the accused Minister had
said in the Chamber itself,lthat a monarchical bth of September was in.
le. ( Murmurs.)
four articles of the accusation were then voted and adopted.
Votes

For the setOiation

... 222

.
Against it ... •• . 78
The President then announced. that M. Creations, defender of M.
°omen Renville, had sent to the Chamber a few observations in his
favour.

Lafitte asked, if the Chambers wished them to be reed
At the extreme left.—No, no.
M. Berryw spoke In favour of the ex-Minister, and maintained that
a culprit ought always to be beard, whatever be had to say.
The Chamber consented to the reading of the observations.
111.
of M. Cremisux Strew, reporter of the commission, then read the obseobservations.

The Chamber then voted the accusation of M. Guemon de Renville
in the same terms as the preceding ; however, the last article of the
accusation gave rise to some observations.
M. Duvergia de Hatuanne observed, that he entertained some doubts
relative to the last article, for this one ought only to be applied to the
ministers who had attended the council in which Paris was declared to
be besieged. K. de Hauranne said that he had heard that 111. de Ren-
ville was not present at the council; he was therefore of opinion that the
last article ought not to be applied to that minister.
Marshal replied, that even supposing this to be the case, 31. de
Renville was still criminal of having contributed to cause civil war, and
therefore the last article was applicable to him as well as the other
ministers of Charles X.

For the accusation .
Against it - • . 74
Votes
The Chamber then proceeded to the accusation of N. Baum; M.
Capelle, and M. de Montbel, who have all fled.
Finns FUNDS, Pests, Sept. 28.-Five per Cents. 97E 97f. 10c.
15e. 10e. 15e. 97f. 96f. 90c. 96f. 80c. 90e. 85e. 90c. 95e. Four
per Cents. 86f. 50c. Three per Cents. 66f. Bk. 70c. 75e. 80c. 90e.
The. 90e. Bank Stock, 17,15 f. Rente de Naples, 68f. 25c. Royal
Spanish Loan, Alf. &tits Peipetuelle d'Espagne, 42. Hayden
Loan, 380 f. Exchange on London, (one month) paper, 25f. 40e;
money, 25f. 40e. ; (three months) paper, 25f. 2.5 e. ; money, 25f. 23c.
-Coors itsthentique.