Star.
London, England, 1830-12-27 00:00:00

tares, which demanded to his only son, and be left hie
this daughters lugs fintsures.
idokowurth, Viscount.
I.—September 16, 1818 . . . .
I.—July 19, 1820 - - . .

_ .
Mountmares, Viscount.
I.—November 23, 11120 - - -
1.-11. Feb 10, 18211 - - -
I.—April 13, ISO _ - •_ __ -

llasooromon, Berl at.
1.--&pternbar 28, 1820

Btrasgford
I—Jannary 2, 1797 . - , LorrL
This nobleman has a large passion as an ambassador;
and It will be seen how the public are charged with his
family.
Aston, Walter Hutcheson, Lord.
B—January 27, 1801 . - - -
Cessation, James Edmund, Lord.
B—Novembes 97, 1811

Ziphinstone , John E. Lord.
B—February 23, 1824 - - -
B—August 31, 1828

Stroll, Gene, an of.

8-31ay 6, 1819

Inibaak, Alexander Murray, Lord.
3—August 31, 1326 - - .

Falkland, lades B. Viscount.
B—June 14, 1816 . . .

Home, Alexaoder, Earl of.
E.—August 23, 1792 - _ -

276 10 0

_ . .
Nalroe, Lord.
8--September 17, 1822 . -

184 0 0

Remy, Erie Mackay, Baron.
3—January 3, 1804 . - - -

184 0 0

Rothe', Earl of.

B—June 16, 1821

276 10 0

Sinclair, Charles, Lord.
B—August 14, 1778

lel 0 0

Semphill, Hugh, Lord.
B—August 31, 1828 . 97 0 0
It may and will undoubtedly be exclaimed by many persona, " Good
Heavens, our poor peers only cost us 13,4001. Ix. 4d. annually. 0
dear, what an insignificant sum ! the vulgar creatures that would
grudge to these unfortunate decayed persons so paltry an allowance!"
Their understanding is nor to be envied. I have classed all the above
names in the liat as poor peers, though many are possessed of affluence;
but there is a tenacity of holding the smallest sums, which is quite dis-
graceful. I shall now go to the cost of the noble ladies, and younger
branches of noble families, amongst whom wilt be found a sad Applica-
tion of the public money; and it is no excuse to say, " The Pension
Lists do not exceed the sum named by Act of Parliament ;" but then,
should not Parliament do away with the whole, and then the King and
his Ministers would be left untrammelled with the solicitations ut no-
ble paupers ?
Harriet Arbuthnot heads the list
Next comes Mrs. Augusta Brudenell, whose very name
smacks of nobility. She stands thus—
Brudenell, Augusta.

- 938 19 0

11— March 21, 1769
E--January 28, 1808

- 101 4 8
- 101 4 8

Brooksbank, Annc.

E-31arch 4, 1783

155 2 0

. - Bouverie, Francis Charlotte.
Ig—September 17

- 81 11 0

- _
Bentinek, lady Jeutinut Helen.
K—Noventber 10, 1809 - - -
This lady is the sister of the Earl of Manlier%
Hendrick, Antoinette, W. J.
E—January 28, 1814 - - -

- Zi3 5 0

- 100 8 8

Bouverie, lion. Arabella.
E—December lb, 11321 .

- 300 7 3

Bathurst, Charlotte.
E—February 10, 1823 . -
E—January 7, 1825 . -
IL—Dec=lW 31, 1829

- 600 8 0
- 200 6 7
- 100 13 9

Bathurst, Mary.

11,-.June 6, 1836

- 250 7 5

_
Burrard, Dame Hannah.
E—November 27, 1813 - -

- 400 13 0

_ .
Brodrick, Mary.
B—February 20, 1827

. 900 G 7

Cockburn, Dame Augusta Anne.

E.. . - - - - - 638 17 0
This lady, if I mistake not, is the mother of Sir James,
Sir George. the Dean of York, and the Colombian or
Mexican Ambassador. She was of a noble family, and
fell in love with her husband, a very handsome man,
but who was either a merchant or held an office in the
India house. To reconcile her marriage with this
person to her family, be was made a baronet. It will
be seen hereafter how this family is provided for by
the public.
Carey, Lavinia, Matilda and Angelis,

8- .

£.. d.
163 18 0

Cumberland Lady Alblida.
E.—July 1, 1794

3JO 11 10

Cathcart, Elizabeth, Baroness.
E.—Ottober 10, 1798 .
Thi■ lady, 1 believe, has also some pension, as having be-
longed to the household of Queen Charlotte, but of
which no mention Is made.
Cockburn, Marianne.
E.—May 29, 1800

389 9 U

Cockburn, Jean.

116 19 0

S.—August 8, 1789 - -
Fanny Cockburn.
S.—February 14, 1791 . -
Cockburn, lMary and Harriet.
1.--March 14, 1791 -
Clare, Dowager Lady, mid Lady Fitsjibbon.
E—March 10, 1803 - - - _ .
Campbell. Elio Maria-
-
E.—September 16, 1805 - - -

184 0 0

97 0 0

IN 0 0

780 2 0

389 9 0

Courtcnay, Elizabeth.
E.—September 17, 1808 - -
Clarina, Peru!lope, Baroness.
E.—March 11, 1803 - .

7.1 19 0

233 5 0

Coke, Elizabeth Anne.
E.—January Si, 1818
This certainly cannot be the Ledy of the Member for
Norfolk.
Cameron, Lady Margaret.
E.—December 22, 1819 - - .
Cockburn, Dame Mary.
E.—May 20, 1825 . .
. .

$1 19 0

SOO 6 1

680 1 8

.. .
Cockburn, Augusta Harriet Mary.
B—April7, 1827

200 G 7

_
Congreve, Dame Inhale.
E.—August 26, 1829 - - - -
This must be the widow of the gentleman of share.noto-
riety, and who was, at oue time, so much about the per-
son of Cierge IV.
Dorchester, Lady Mary.
E.—January 16, 1766 - - - .
Drummond, Mary Dulcibella.
E.—July 1, 1818 _ - _ - . . .

300 11 W

Douglas, Dame Anne.
E.—August 1, 1120 - . -
Do Boos, Ludy G. Fitzgerald.

E.—August 26

Enkine, Louisa.
IT..—hebruary, I, 1801
We believe this pens to be the same as—.

Erskine, Lady Louisa.
B.—March 8, 1801 -
If thin Lady now receives this pension, it is most extraor-
' dinary : she was daughter of the old Lord Uxbridge,
and ran away to many Colonel Erskine—a love match
which greatly offended her father, and the old King
gave her this pension. She afterwards became the
wife of Sir George Murray. This gentleman has just
retired from the office of Colonial Secretary. If he
sanctions her drawing this pension as the divorced wife
of Sir James Erskine, well may it be exclaimed "Nob
putior 1"
Three Younger Children of the late Lord Erskine, Lord
Chancellor of England.
E.---September 30, 1824

276 10

151 1 5

Fox, Elizabeth Bridget, Widow.
B.—December 4, 1808
This Lady is the Widow of Charles James Fox, and the
pension is a stain on his nephew, Lord HoUAW, and
the other great Whig Foxites. The Fox ilub should
have found the funds for a pension for his widow.
Fitzroy, Lady Mary.
-
E.—February 7, 1821 - -
Berries, Isabella, Math.
B —April 17. 1799 - . . . .
B.—December 2, 1814 -

938 10 0

SOO II 7

Huntingdon, Children of the live Earl of,
Z.—August 29, 1839

Nuthingten, Dame Panay,
Z.—November 47,1813 I • • ,