Star.
London, England, 1830-03-31 00:00:00

mining to the house a motion be bad that day brought forward.
He was aware of the honourable gentleman's industry, not only by
the researches he had made, for with respect to these he had
informed the house that he diligently studied the state of the
land revenues of the crown, but by explanations and allusions
made to suit his own purposes,while he omitted other parts of
the documents which would have explained his charges. Thus
the honourable gentleman, in alluding to the book of 1786, served
his purpose by referring to a document where every thing was
confused, without any reference to counties; but if the honourable
gentleman had chosen to refer to the for the last thirty
years, he would have found not merely the referred to,
but the different properties in London described under the heads of
their respective parishes. The hon. gentleman certainly imposed a
considerable task upon him in endeavouring to follow him, because
he had begun with the Heptarchy, and came down to the time of
William 111. In that, however, the hon. member could have found
no great difficulty, because every thing he had mentioned was to be
found in the reports, and was before commented upon by Middleton,
Lord Barham, and by Fordyce. It was useless for the hon. gentle-
man to enter into one part of the subject, because It was impossible
to find a remedy for the prodigality of Charles II co for the partiality
of Wm. 111. towards those whose exertions had secured him the
throne; neither would he (Lord Lowther) attempt to defend the
jobs of the time of Geo. I. for they were most gross, and such as
would not be permitted in the reign of George IV. (Hear.) Neither
would he deny the necessity, in 1786, of the declaration that the
crown lands were in a bad situation, and required great improve-
ment; but he would say that since 1786 those revenues had been
gradually increasing. In 1797, they were 45,1331. in 1802 they
were 49,0001. in 1805, they were 59,0001 at a later period they
were 250,0001. and they were at present 271,0001. That showed the
efficiency of the commission given by Mr. Pitt ; and there were still
fair prospects of the revenues thing. notwithstanding the exaggerated
statements of the hon. member. In the first instance he would
go through_the notes he had taken, in the order of the honourable
member's speech. In his account of Henry the Eighth's time,
although he did not see what that had to do with the present,
he agreed with him as he did with respect to Cromwell,
who sold the crown lands at seven or eight years' purchase, which
was one of the reasons why Charles the Second rescinded several of
the bargains. The hon. gentleman's allegation, with respect to a
noble lord (we believe the Earl of Aluigeave,) and the sum of
20,0001. was partially correct ; but he was mistaken as to the 1,2001.
a-year out of the Consolidated Fund. The lion. gentleman then
went to Newark ; but he (Lord L.) would say that, if the hon.
member would produce any person to give the increased rent he spoke
of, he would undertake the responsibility, and accept it. But
he knew that no such thing would be done, for he was well as
quainted with Newark, and there was not one there who would
come forward with a deposit. The honourable gentleman
would lead the house astray la quoting the rent of houses
in London. because he calculated not merely on the ground..
rent, but on the value of the houses : that was unfair, and k
might be estimated by the allusion that had been made to Spring-
garden terrace. There was an old house there which he (Lord L.)
had at 2501. a year on the ground.rent ; now he rented it at that sum ;
it rested on his hands for four or five years, and be had been obliged
to give as good as 5001. to have it taken off his hands. That would
show the exaggerated statement of the hon. member. He was aware
that some of the estates were capable of great improvement. The
Crown stood, with respect to none of them, in so good a position as
it did with respect to Sunk Island. The improvements had been
executed in a manner highly creditable to the lessee. As to Eltham,
that was one of the estates which he anticipated would be worth a
considerable deal more than it was at present. The honourable
gentleman] had himself visited the estate of Rosedale. (Hear.) He
(Lord L.) never was at that estate, but the surveyor blamed the
office of woods for not disposing of it in lots. It was an estate
which was a desirable property for a gentleman. In the Charing-
cross Act, government took power to sell certain estates for the
purpose of improvement. This estate was in a part of the country
not very accessible, and it was not every person who would pun.
chase it. As to the public-house bought at Virginia Water, he
(Lord L.) admitted that it was an extravagant price; but the
public-house stood in Windsor-park, fifty yards from Virginia
Nrater, and in his Majesty's favourite drive. If any purchase
wasexcusabh., it was that. As to Lord Westmorelaunl's purchase
of Rockingham, the hon. gentleman had given a history of it
Rom 1704 to 1806. The land was purchased in 1774, for
17,0001. Lord Westmoreland having, in 1764, bought the
timber on the freehold. He would not enter into the particu-
lars as to Merton and Waak.. He was aware that it
was capable of improvement. He (Lord L.) knew the estate as
well as the hon. gentleman's agent who had surveyed it in the sum.
mer. He did not think that the bon. member had made out any
Igrounds for going into a Committee. As to the expellees of the es.
tablishment, he was at issue with the hon. gentleman. Instead of
being 50 per cent. it was not more than 20 per cent. It was dif.
ferent from a private establishment. In a public office every letter
must be copied and registered. The bon. member had mixed up in
his statement all the old offices. From 1815 to the present time
offices had been reduced, so that there was a saving of 10,0001. a
year. Formerly there were two Secretaries the outranger had
1,0001 a-year, and that bad been reduced. There was a saving in
one office of 4,0001. a-year, and many others were in the course of
revision. In a few years there would be still farther' reductions.
The noble lord said that he would not further detain the house, and
submitted that the motion ought not to be agreed to.
Colonel DAVIES said that, whatever impression might have
been made upon the house, the speech of the honourable member
for Colchester was calculated to make a deep impression upon the
public at large. lie had made out a case which imperiously called
-for investigation. He, for one, thanked the hon. member for his
able statement, and the extent and depth of his research. He (Col.
D.) should confine himself to the report, and should be able to show
that if abuses existed in former times, they did not cease to exist
at the time the report had been brought up. From what was con.
Mined in the report, it appeared that there had been a most
improvident expenditure of revenue. There had not only been
no revenue within the last few years, but enormous debts had
been incurred. The commisaionets stated, in their sixteenth
report, that they estimated the crown lands at 400,0001.
per annum. This statement was confirmed by an elaborate
report. The whole charges for management were 36,0001. In
1826 the total revenue of the royal forests was 53,1441. and the
expenses of collecting it, 36,8551. In the following year the
of collecting the revenue was 1,2001. more than the receipts. (Wee:::.;
Every year the expenses had been much greater than they ought to
have been, and the subject. in his opinion, was one deserving the
most serious inquiry. He would not say anything about the " gew.
gaws" that had been thought of, but go to other items of expenditure.
He found that in the year 1828 St. James's and Hyde Parks
cost the country 10,0001 Regent's Park coot 6,0001. Windsor
Park, 20,6001, Richmond Park, 12,0001. In short, the whole
expenses during that year amounted to 73,2001. In the year
1827, the expenses were 92,7001. In 1828, 116,1431. Surely,
then, these were sums that the House would never allow to be
!pandered away without inquiry. It would never suffer the sub-
ject to pass like a summer's cloud. The Hon. Member for Col.
chester had not exaggerated his statement. The total expenditure
of the land revenue during three. years amounted to 1,388,1681.
665,0001 was the ordinary revenue per year, and when 1,300,0001.
same to be expended, surely it was a subject demanded inquiry.
The Noble Lord had alluded to the improvements at Charing-cross
and Regent street. Now the estimate for the last-named improve-
ment was 368,000 L when the actual cost was 1,803,0001—(hear).—
He (Colonel Davis) objected to the whole manner in which this
part of the public bugling was transacted. If the letting of
the ground rents had not been entrusted to Mr. Nash, in.
stead of their bringing in 36,0001. per year they would barn
realised three times that amount. The estimate for the Charing-
eras improvements was 1,147,0001. Now he understood that
nearly that sum had been already expended. He thought, therefore,
that a committee teinvestigate all these matters was necessary. He
did nu think that tEe disposing of ground rents ought to be left to
one individual ; they ought to be put up to auction, and sold to the
highest bidders, and he must say it would be most ungracious of go-
vernment, if they refused the inquiry. The hon. member for Col-
chester bad his cordial thanks in bringing forward the present :no.
titre, and, if the professions of ministers were not idle nonsense, it
would meet with but little opposition. He had entered the house at
the commencement of the session with a determination to support
the present government, but if it refused inquiry in such a ease as
this he could not give it his honest and conscientious support. He
hoped that the house would agree to the motion.
Mr. ARBUTHNOT then rose, but spoke in so low a tom that
it was impossible to hear correctly what he stated. We understood
him to airy that the statement made by the bon. member far Wor-
cester (Col. Davies) was not at all correct, or glue fairly; that the
business of the office of Woods and Forests was conducted in the
most economical manner. The lion. member then vindicated the
conduct of Mr. Nash respecting the improvements in Regent-
street. It was true that they cost three times the amount of the
estimate at first given in, but that arose frMn ciralmlstances which
could not by pouibßity be foreseen, as it was not possible to al.
mate the value of the good-will of persons in possession *of
homes that would be required. He Would "Mare the house
that ehe greatest economy was observed in the office of Woods And
guests; that no work was undertaken without having aeveral sod-
mulls, and which estimates were generally found to be correct. 'With
upper to the improvements in the Strand, Mr. Nash'esdamied
Apo et 746,0001. and ae early as could be ascertained; they irpudd
not exceed tint sum by mom shout 95,0081. and which mess
area, as in the ease of Regent-street, by the wens Obtained; by the
maims tenants. Alter some Geiser observations, tg hie, number
emelatied by saying he was ready and 'hoed" be happy Wrapover
egyojonelemis Mat might he asked.
DAVIES estplained.
Mr. MIMIC supported the Motion, and contended that there was -
general milinsasgensent In, the whole deportment ; but this, how.

ever, he was not inclined to attribute to the noble lord who presided
over the woods and forests. The system itself was liable to great
abuse, and ought to be new modelled. With respect to the supply
of timber which the crown forests furnished to the easy, it was
trifling in the extreme. Let any man only put 'Ton the table the
number of loads—(loud laughter) ; well, what he tneunt was—let
any man only put upon the table a return of the number of loads,
and then the house would be convinced of the fact which he WI
stated. If the uantity of timber which these forests suplied le
the navy were weqighed with silver, he maintained that silver wadi
be found equal to it in weight. What he should propose was, ant
all the crown lands, except such as were necessary for the asonure.
dation of the sovereign, should be sold off, and a fund might both.
created which should go towards reducing the national debt.
Mr. HUSKISSON protested against the length to which some
gentlemen would carry the interference of the house, even on sub.
jects over which parliament had no just or legitimate control. He
denied that they had any right to dispose of the hereditary revenue
of the crown without the express consent of the crown, or that
they had any sight to dispose of it beyond the life of the present
sovereign. The honourable member for Montrose complained that
the crown property was neglected, that the management of it
was very remiss and improvident ; and he complained that, in
consequence of that mismanagement, no timber was sent into the
dock-yards for our ships. The honourable gentleman ought to
recollect that the plantations were but twenty years old ; and in
that time they certainly could not be expected to produce timber
fit for ship-building. It was true that, from the reign of King
William down to the time when the present plantations were pro-
jected, the forests were very much neglected ; but during the war,
when oak became much wanted, the government turned its most di.
ligent attention to this subject, and there were now 40,000 acres of
plantations, which were in a most flourishing condition, and which
would, in due time, furnish an abundant supply of the most va-
luable timber for national purposes. It was not the fault of the
present government that former governments had not paid all the
attention which they might have done to this portion of the na-
tional property. He would say that at present the woods and fo-
rests were as well managed as such property could possibly be. It
must, no doubt, be attended with large expenses, but those ex.
peaces were kept within the narrowest stale consistent with the ne.
cessary preservation and improvement of the plantations. The wood.
men, for instance, received only 15s. a week, and efficient
men could not be procured on lower terms. He did not know
on what grounds the honourable gentleman assumed that the
Crown lands ought now to be worth 700,0001. a year. Their valu.
'Atkin in 1793 was stated at 400,0001. a year. However, he had no
doubt that the Crown estate in the metropolis would, on the falling.
in of the leases, be worth 500,0001. a year. The ground.rent was
worth 100,0001. and he thought he was not too sanguine in estimat.
deg each house as being worth five times as much as the ground upon
which it stood. The remainder of the Crown property—including
lands, manors, and woods—would be about 250,0001. or 300,0001.
more ; so that the whole Crown property would, in its reversionary in.
terest, be worth about 800,0001. instead of 400,0001. He did not think
It necessary to follow the hon. member for Colchester through all
his calculations and statements. It was only necessary for the
house to recollect, that when the civil list was granted, in the time
of Queen Anne, a power was given to the Crown to alienate the
lands coming under the denomination of Crown property. But an
immense change was made by Mr. Pitt's Act, in 1794 ; and he
begged gentlemen to reflect upon the effects of that change upon the
influence of the Crown in that house, and generally in the country.
In 1786, the whole of that property, which was now said to be
worth 400,0001. did not let for 16,0001. and the Act to which be
had alluded had the effect of depriving the Crown of all the info.
ence and patronage arising to it from dispensing these possessions.
—By parting with that influence, the Crown gave up greater
power than by almost any other measure that could be in.
stanced. The honourable gentleman complained of the manage.
meet of the crown property, particularly in the granting of yew
newals. He (Mr. Huskisson) could contradict the supposition of
mismanagement in this respect, by referring to a variety of in.
stances. He knew of many lessees of this property who, having
held their leases before the Act of 1794, refused to take renewals
of them afterwards, because they did not find the terms advan-
tageous. The woods and forests gave no such easy or profitable
bargains as hon. gentlemen supposed. What was the effect of
the Act of 1754 ? It provided that, en the expiration of
any lease of house, manor, or lands, the persons acting
in the management of the crown estates should employ
a surveyor, or surveyors, who should, upon their oaths,
value the estate at its rack rent. The estimate was theit
handed to the office of woods and forests, who had no
option of controul over it. The act went on to oblige them to
oar a renewal of the lease to the former lessee, at the valuation of
the surveyors, with an abatement of five per cent.; and, if he is.l
fused it, they were then to give it to the occupiers, or to any one
else who would take it at its full estimated value. He could men.
tion several cases in proof of this uniform practice. The Marquis
of Stafford, for instance, held an estate at Chelsea, which, on the
expiration of the lease, he refused to take at the abatement of
five per cent., and consequently that property was, as was
done In all such cases, let to the occupiers, or others. In
short, the Woods and Forests always insisted upon the best
rent that could possibly be obtained ; and be would assert
that private gentlemen, in the management of their estates,
were not near so strict as those who had the management of that de-
partment. Ica order to confute this position, the hon. member bad
referred to an estate in Kent, the manor of Eltham ; but how was
that property circumstanced ? It had been let about five-and-twenty
years ago to the present lessee, who had also been the former lessee.
The rent was 3,9001. a-year. What was the result ? In times of
golden prospects this individual rented it out in small portions, and
be got a premium of from 26,0001. to 30,0001. But mark the M.
quel. Before he (Mr. Huskisson) left the office of Woods
and Forests, this lessee, John Shaw, came to the Commission.
era, and said hit he was unable to get from his under.
tenants any thing like the rent that he was obliged to pay,
and, therefore, he prayed them to make him a reduction.
But what was the reply ? The Commissioners said, " No; you
have taken the property as a speculation—you have taken it fee
better for worse—and if you cannot make as much of it now as in
more prosperous times, you must put up with the lass." This wee
their invariable principle. They never made an abatement unless
the party requiring it were the occupying tenant, and, in such a cue,
they fbund ft a mauer not only of justice but policy to do so. All
that he could say, with respect to the various cases referred to by
the honourable member for Colchester, and the general charges made
by the honourable member for Montrose, was that, if they would
put their'fingers upon any one particular case in which they sup-
any of what they called jobbing or mismanagement to
Erveed taken place, he would beg of his honourable friends
in office to runlet* the Hon. Gentleman with every paper that could
throw any light upon the case, and he was quite sure his Honourable
Friends on the bench below him would be most happy to comply.
But he only prayed Gentlemen not to make general charges which
had no foundation. The Hon. Gentlemen complained that the Com-
missioners of Woods and Forests were u neglectful of the public
interests, in respect to those Crown Lands which they disposed of,
as in those 'which they kept in their own management; and refe-
rence had been made to the arrangement with the Earl of Mulgrave;
but the Hoe. Gentleman forgot to state that the Noble Earl had
paid a sum of 97,0001. and was now paying 1,2001. a year. He
did not undertake to say whether thiswas the full value of the
property for which it was given as the consideration, nor was it De.
eessuy for the defence of those at present in office that he should
say so, for that arrangement was made before 1794 ; but he only
said that the honourable gentleman ought to have ascertained the real
state of the wee Ineorelre used it for the purposes of his own ar.
gument. Reference had also been made to the case of the Sari
at Westmoreland, in which it was said that 9001. a-y_ear bad
been sold for 13,0001. But how did that case stand ? His noble
friend, bad In the Forest of Rockingham, a very ancient right of
this description. He was entitled to the timber until it reached
a certain she, but at that size or dimension, it became the pro.
of the crown. The consequence was, that a great patine
party of
timber was cut down by the crown, and the noble enelp
in his own defence, was obliged to cut down the trees beforet2
reached the stipulated growth. The arrangement which was n
grew out of this complicated opposition of rights; but be multi
assure the hon. gent. that, so far was it from being safkimetig
to the Earl of Westmoreland, that he for a long dine as.
murred to it. Now uto the prices obtained for manors, it should
be recollected that some of them entailed a heavy expense, heti
the noes ei7 of holding Courts, and, therefore, it wee *al fir
dispose of them on any terms that could be got. But they were
always mid by public ask or by scaled tenders. He knew
o'. tamer where, in centequente of this mode of riesling, when
the was expected to be about 1001. it tumid mat to be
4;1101111. The boost of Exmoor, which bets saw beenght
as. ramie a.year, and which they wephi ts been 810210 at
slum Irese
hold by
foolorlodwhitabetri: wen sad, kiralwas gWg
was sorry to say that, in getting rid et the ad arab.
ippae_roanore, they generally felLJnto the hands Ir. Mil
mellow attorneys, who tuned them to the annoyance
held mar Sm. The boa
_rodents' bed referred to t=
of Blebstead ea having prated unfairly by selling the remainikit
ar the lease of his house in Privy-wdens. He would, in a lb*
wattle, explain that transaction. Tbe home in Priv/P
had ilooliod to the Riolumad fund/ Ox malty yarn.
elm. .t wm keened by ambient, aid the Duke did not re-
ld , but continued for some. due to cum a put which had
r Wed:froth the conflagratioo. When be wished to give up
Butra valuation yea ramie, and it Rao eatipiated at 3,000 L
Cotiamissiesers of Woods and Forests said; 44 Vou were
tobTlso rebuild the hems, and we will dance *ma the sum which
inl to,poy 04. Sthe rronaitiler of tbe lean the &Mount which
ought to nave seem notpendixi. He was sure that no
own theme
on-
cuukd which would admit of a similar explanation on the part'

of the woods and forests. In the estimate made by the hon. member
opposite, he had taken the revenue of these parishes, so yurcl•ased,
at 8,0001. annually, and stated the expense of last year at
12,0001. forgetting that a great part of that was only an occa-
sional outlay in building and repairs, which would not occur again
for yeats. Instead of being an overgrown parish, it had by these
means been divided into four parishes; and so little could Cohere.
anent be charged with a greedy hankering after patronage, that ma
out of the four parishes had been annexed to the patronage of tile
See of London. There was nothing more absurd than the Wen
often reiterated by the hon. mover, and the hon. member for Aloe -
trose--" sell the whole of the Crown property." For first, it could
not be attempted except it win by the consent of the Crown, end i-s
positive recommendation. The grand ground of dispute was. s, to
the propriety of carrying this revenue to the account of the Corso_lidated Fund, which it was allowed had not been done for sonic
years, and hence it was assumed that there was son* Jelt,on te
suspect some abuses might have been practised in this OCrat!.
ment. Now the fact was, that all the money expended ...
Buckingham-house and the Strand improvements had been, in
first instance, applied for to Parliament, and sanctioned by by i.,
vote, ere this appropriation of the grounds of the Crown property
had been made by Government. Much, however, he would ac.
knowledge, of misconception and obloquy would be obviated were
the whole receipts of this revenue paid over to the Consolidated Fund,
and he would recommend the adoption of that plan to his right 1:0::.
friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer, to set the question of abuse
at rest, and defy even suspicion in future. It was another pregn
proof of the inconceivable blundering of the hon. members for Cal-
a:ester and Montrose, that they should presume to talk of selling a:1
the estates of the Crown, or that part, at least, which was called
the waste lands of these estates. For instance, Epping Forest,
which, if sold, said they, at 61. per acre, would create an enewsuou.
fund. Now, what rights had the crown ?—for it had no property
in the soil—it merely possessed a right to the herbage used by the
royal deer. The right of the soil here, or at the New Forest, or
Dean Forest, was not in the crown, so that it had scarcely any
thing to sell. It was preposterous to hear of its sale producing any
thing at all ;—no one would purchase such a mere raked right en
herbage for deer; and over the New Forest the only right re-
served was, that of setting apart 0,000 acres for the growth of
naval timber. On Dean Forest the crown possessed only th,-
right to the large timber, the Duke of Crofton being proprie-
tor of the whole of the underwood ; and the patronage belong
ed to the neighbouring parishes, about 100 in number; whilst
at Sherwood forest the crown asserted no title except to herbage
for royal deer, and not a single deer was to be seen there for
years past—(a laugh.) He begged the house to abstain front
meddling with royal forests, from the sad specimen of ill success
they had met with in disafforesting that once splendid appendag:
of the dignity of the crown, Windsor forest, now cut inn.
square allotments, robbed of its fine ornamental and useful
timber, the growth of ages, and never yet having realised ti..-
expence of its inclosure--(hcar.) There were now about 41,001 -
acres of these forests under timber, which had been pro-
nounced by the Duke of Portland—whose competency to de-
cide, from his own success in his vast plantations, no one wunii •
question—to be far finer than any timber rte himself possessed.
hour might arrive, as it had arrived before, when the country niii;ht
be saved the regret and the apprehension it once experienced
last war, lest the supply of this sort of timber for our navy might
fail us. Such was the conduct of the present management of the
crown lands, in this instance, that, whilst their appropriation
had been made by the honourable members the subject of a
sneer, far more intelligent and experienced individuals had consi-
dered this management a decided proof of the ability and integrity
of those intrusted with this very important charge.
Sir JOHN SEBRIGHT commented with great severity on the
waste of public money which had taken place at Buckingham House.
The only atonement that could be made to the insulted taste of the
public would be, to plant the palace out, so that it might not be
visible.
Mr. W. SMITH said it would be, he was sure, quite opposed to
the desire of the illustrious owner if the wishes of all persons, high
and low, relative to. the opening front Waterloo-place into tit.
Jamea's-park were not complied with. In fact, if it were not opened,
he would move an address himself to the crown, to learn by whose
direction this desirable approach to the park had been prevented
from forming part of the design of the improvements on which such
enormous sums were now squandering.
Mr. RIDLEY COLBORNE certainly thought a pledge had
been given him when he addressed the right hon. gentleman on
this subject, that it was to be understood the passage through Wa-
terloo-place should be opened to the accommodation of all foot
passengers.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL maintained the House had no
more right to divest, by its vote, the Crown of its Church property,
as proposed by the Hon. Member opposite, than to rob any Hon.
Member there of his ancestral estate. By the settlement made with
his present Majesty, on his accession to the throne it was true he
had resigned his title to the Crown Lands, in consideration of what
the advisers of the Crown thought an equivalent, but on the demist
those rights and that title would revive. It was no time at this mo-
ment to advise a sale of the whole of those ancient domains, or even
a part of those Crown lands, which it was hoped would shortly, an.
der the present management, produce rents equal, or nearly so, to
the maintenance of the dignity, state, and splendour of the British
Crown.

Mr. D.W. HARVEY replied ; after which a division took place.
when there appeared—
For the motion
Against it
Majority
Lord F. L. GOWER moved foe leave to Wag in a bill to amend
the Irish Constabulary Act. His object was to transfer the con-
stabulary appointments in Ireland from the magistracy to the gu-
VUDlnitnt.
After a few words from Mr. 8. Ricz, Mr. TaAN T Mr. Jo H
sox, and sir. Dawson, leave was given to bring in the bilL
The other coders of die day were then disposed of, and the bons(
adjourned at a quarter before Two.

LIST of the MINORITY of 124, who voted on Sir J. Graham's
Motion, on the 29th day of March, 1330, for ABOLISHING
the OFFICE of LIEUTENANT-GENERAL, of the OR D.
N A NCK
Althorp, Lord Fauberley, J. N. Hobart., A. W.
Attwood, M. Forteseue, Hon.G.M. Ramsden, J. C.
Burrell, Sir C. Fyier. T. B. Ramsbottoin, J.
Burrell, W. Gordon, R. Rice, T. S.
Baring, Sir T. Grant, Rt. Hon. C. Bickford, W.
Baring, F. Grant, R. Ridley, Sir K. W.
Baring, W. B. Heneage, G. F. Robinson, Sir G.
Beaumont, W. F. Hobhouse, JC. Robinson, G. R.
Blandford, Marquis Honywood, P. Russell, Lord J.
Buck, L. Howard, H. Rumbold, C. E.
Benett, J. • Howick, Lord Sefton. Lord
Bernal, R. Hume, J. Scott, Hon. W. H.
Brownlow, C. Jeplisno. C. Sibtborp. CoL
Burdett, Sir F. Keck, Legh Smith, W.
Bentinck, Lord G. Kemp. T. R. Smith, V.
Birch, J. Killeen, Lord Smith, R.
Bright, Henry Knatchbull,Smith, J.
Buxton, J. J. Lebouchere, Henry Stanley, E.
Boston, T. F. Lamb, Hoc. G. Thomson, C. P.
Bankes, Henry Lambert, J. 8. Thompson, P. B.
Cave, 0. Lawley, F. Tomes, J.
Cavendish, W. Lester, B. Townsend, Lord C. .
Carter, 3. Littleton, E. Vyvyan, Sir R.
Calthorpe, Hon. A. Leonia!, T. B. Waldman, Ald.
Canning, Rt. Hon. S Lloyd, Sir Z. Wood. Alderman
Calvert, N. Lumley, J. S. Wood, C
Clifton, Lord Moberly, J. Wilbraham, G.
Clive E. - Moberly, Col. Wrottesley. Sir J.
Oilbirne, N. R. Marshall, W. Warburton, H.
Dais. Col. T. Martin, J. Whitmore, W. W.
Ornerier, R. D. Manyatt, J. Wells, J.
Dawson A. Mario:thanks, S. Whitbread, S.
Cliekso, W. I. Milton, Lord Wetherell, Sir C.
Tholes°, J. E. Macdonald, Sir J. Wigram, W.
Da Cane. P, Monck, J. E. Warrender, Sir G.
Dudes, Hon. T. Morpeth, Lord Tatum.
Dyads*, Hon. Sir R. Nugent, Lord Graham, Sr J.
Dlincombe, Hon. W. Ord, W.
Dick Q. Parnell, Sir H. itAILID 011.
Dickinami, W. &adonis, BW. Calvert, C..
Ebriogton, Lord Philips, Sir G. Tennyson, C.
Elks, Hoe. G. A. Philips, G. Newport, Sir J.
Encombe, Lord l'onsoohy, Hots. F. Rowley, Sir W.
anoint Lord title., Sir. Rt. Oben*, Lon! F.
Ram, J. Protheroe. E. Esilo, 4.
211111111111111112.1.1 mm ', .
HOUSE OF COMMONS—TaftP4Y.
NQTICIIB OF MOTIONS.
14IT. Bertiesig Eoel—to allidy he leave to b4pi Ilp a Bill to con.
solidate sad mind the Laos rdittiOS to Torpry.
Mr. Hasp ant for aR l t etam ehe informations insti.
bold under do Malkin Act.
Mr. Hohltsoho—to sive for Returns sbowiss to what Liabilities
the Bask's), Ellshod y'
tats ' •
Mi. Mem —lossill to hdos in aUP bt WWI area .
eattind to Mood ' of the Ael Maio. lit. F. 87.
fir tbe Adolohivedos -Amish aria :dire die2seetator, to
"bela :2:::=is it
Mi. ' Wove*/ hare to VP* la a Bill fir the
better Yessoadest of doe Olin ilium*" of di Mitts- I
BwPfir—
ostamptiElitir Tilf "V'
•
Ways and Moros—dissr: