Star.
London, England, 1815-06-28 00:00:00

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28, 1815.

FROM LISP' NIGIIPS LONI4OI G4IZLY7E.

ER I. AT Min the Gazette Ez.raurtUnary of Thursday, June SS,
ISt N—ln the List set Officers wounds d:—for Major-General
Cork, right arm amputated—read Litutensnt-Gencral Csopke,
left arm antrutated.

• BANKRUPTS.
James Cu'l, late of Newport, Isle of Wight, Hants, brewer, malt-
ster, wine and spirk.merchant, to surrender July 20, at two,
July 93, at eleven, and August 8, at two, at the 13:s1e Itios,
in Newport. Anomie, Mr. Cussing, Newport; or Messrs.
Bleasdale, Alexander, and Holme, Nest Inn, London.
Richard Hopkins, of Cath, grocer, dealer and chapman, July 8,
10, and August N, at eleven, at the York Hotel, Bath Attor-
nies, Mr. I'. M. Cruttwell, llath; or Messrs. frowd and Raga,
14, Serle-street, Lincoln's-inn, London.
Peter Honks, of Stourport, Worcestershire, grocer. dealer and
chapman, July 19, t 0, and August 8, at eleven' at the Guilds
hall Coffee-hums., Worcester. Anomie., Mr John l'ovmall,
Staple-lun, London; or Mr. Samuel Hatden, Worcester.
Thomas Roberts, of Liverpool, merchant, dealer and chaptnan,
July 10, i I, aad August 8, at one, at the King's Arms, Water-
street, Liverpool. Attornies, Mr. Charles Bird, Liverpool; or
. Messrs. Shephard, Adlington, and Gregory, Bedlord• rows
Thomas Till% of Monmouth, timber-merchant, dealer aud
chaptnan, Jul; 7,8, and August 8, at eleven, at the Black Rock,
Portscuet. Attornits, Mr. Pugh, 33, Bernard-street, Russell-
square, London; or Mr. Phlllpotts, Monmouth.
Joseph Hafford, of Leicester, grocer, July In, 19, and August 8,
at eleven, at the Three Crowns Inn, Leicester. Anomie',
Mr. 1). Cooke, Leicester;, or W. R. James, Nu. 3, Earl-street,
Blackft tars, London. ,
Thomas Cooke, late of Ludlow, Salop, grocer, dealer aad chap-
man, July 7, it, and Augutt 8; at twelve, at the Sun Ludt W.
Attornits, MeUrs• Russet apd Jones, Zudlow ; or Mr. High-

. .
moor, Scot's-yard, Bush lane,Londor. - -
Edmund Simms(ls the youuger, late of Atherstone, Warwick-
shire, hat-manufaefurcr, dealer and ehlmmin, July 6, at live,
July 7, and August 5, at eleven, at the Red lion, l4nnwell.
Atiormes, Messrs. Berridge, 66, Hatton-Garde:, London; or

Mr.Paget, Atherstone.
William 'Anglian; of Bristol, victualler, dealer aid chapman,
July 5, el, and August 8, at eleveo, at the Isummer Turrets,
Bristol. Attorneys, Messrs. Poole and Green&;di Gray's Inn,
Loudon; or George Martin, Bristol.
lames Fisher, of Huddersfield, Yorkshire, grocer, August 4,5,
and 8, at tell, at the White Hart. Hudderaield. Anoraks,
Messrs. Watts Pairthortie, and Clarke, Waratord court, Lon
don; or Mr. Allison, Huddersfield.
George Cox the younger, (and nut John Cox the younger, as ad-
vertuted in the Gazette of the 24th instant), late of the City of
Exeter, seediman, dealer and chapman, July t, 8, and August
8, (and not August 5, as before advertised), at one, at Guild-
hall, Loudon. Attorney, Mr. Brown, London uaisnercial
fiale-Rounis, Mincing-lane, London.
Edwird listt, John b4cksheli, amid Augu-tine William Batt,
sum or late of Whitey, Oxfordshire, bankers and copartners,
July 1 i, 42, and August tt, at twelve, a; Guildhall, London.
Attortes, Mr. Ltake and Mr. Wes:eil, Wittiey ; or Mr.
Lowden, Clements inn, London.
John Outhwaite and George Outhwaite., of Pancras-lane, in
the L'ity of London, merchants, dealers and chapasen, July 4,
11, and August 8, at twelve, at Guildhall, London. Amu-
nits, Messrs. Bourdilloa and Hewitt, Little Fr.day-street.

Highness the Prince Regent, entuddering that .t was moat im-
portant to provide for the em,,rgeneles of the present
trusted that the House would enable hialvlajesty to provide for
such exigencies as may occur.
On the motion of the Right Hon Gentleman, the Maine
was ordered to be referred to a Co.umiree to-morrow.

Sir hi W. RIDLEY Alai& that it was hla Intentiou to oppose
any further grants for buds purposes.

FINANCIAL KTATE OF IRELAND.
Mr. VESEY Fr EZGERALD moved that the
Report from the Finance Commi:tee be entered as
read. . _

Mi. V. FITZGERALD said, that as he did not
apptehend that the motion which l►e should have the
honour of submitting to the House would meet with
any opposition, it would not be necessary fir him to!
enter into any detailed observations upon the su'iject.
The House was aware that a Committee ha
appointed Ibis Session, similar to that which had
been appointed ors a fortn•r Session, to inquire into
the state of the Finances of Ireland; that Committee,
after very mature deliberation, made a Repot,
in consequence of the very volorrainouaA pp, radix which
was subjoined to it, coati not he printed am, deliver-,
ed to the Members helare this day ; he Olotild there.'
fore deem it unfair to enter into an; discussion upon
the subject now, even if he diil oat iiitend to submit
the motion with which he shoulA h►Ve the honour if
concluding. After examining into the state of the
Finances of Ireland the COMMittee came to a resola.

don, which they considered themselves competent to
do, under the Act if 'Union, of recoritnendieg a
consolidation of the Exchequers of the two countries.
He was aware that there preys led iii the Committee
a difference of opinion upon the construction of the
7th article of the Union, and if the question were
now to be discussed, he should feel it necessary to
justify, the principles 'Tim which the Committee had
proceeded ; but as that was not the case, he should
abstain from offering any arguments upon the sub-
ject ; at the same time the House wouldieel that it
was right to mark its sense of the importance of the
subject, by coming to a resolution to take the report
tuto consideration early in the next Session. There
were many reasons, even if he were speaking at an
earlier period of the Session, why the House should
postpone the consideration to the next Session. The
object of the proposition was to alter the whole state
of the Finance of Ireland, and it was therefore highly
necessary that the public of that country should be
fully apprised of the extent of the measure, and of
the ,manner in which it would affect them, before it
WAS definitively adopted. lie should, therefore, not
trouble the House any longer, except to read the last
paragraph of the Report, which recommended the
consolidation of the two Exchequers. Mr. Fitzgerald
having read the paragraph, concluded with moving
that the said Report be taken into consideration early
text Se's-fen of Pariiiment.
Mr. BrINKES said, he should follow the example
of moderation which the Right Hon.Gentlernan had
set to him, and abstain from entering into the discus-
sion at present. In all that he had said of the im-
portance and magnitude of the subject he fully cen-
ceived, he concur red too in the propriety of deterring
the consideration until the next Session. He was cnel
of those who differed from the Right Hon. Gentle-1
man, and front the majority of the Committee, in'
opinion respecting the construction of the 7th article
of the Act of Unions; he thought they had taken an
erroneous view of the whole question. He did not
deny, however, that to mny pod results might follow
from the adoption of the recommendation of the
Committee, and from the proposed union of the two
Exchequers. He could not avoid taking this opp-ir-
tunity of doing justice to the abilities of the Right
Hon. Gentleman.—(Hear, /oar.)—Whatever course
might be taken, he should regret any measure which
should deprive the country of the Right Hon. Gen-
tlenian's services; he had often differed from him,
but he bad at all times been sensiole of the gre at
talents and knowledge which he priss:ssed, and of the
candour which he had upon all occasions sheen, and
of the zeal, the fidelity, and distinguished ability
with which he had discharged all his public duties.
.He had adopted the financial system which he found
acted on by others ; if in his (Mr. Bankes) opinion
he had followed it too long, he had on the other
hand shewed energy and great ability in his.efforts
to ameliorate the financial state of Ireland.—(Hear,
hear.)—If these were faults, they were the faults of
those who had preceded the Right Hon. Gentleman,
the merits of improvement were all his own.
The Resolution'was agreed to.
ASSIZS OF MEAD.
Mr. FRANKLANI) LEWIS moved that the
Bread Assize Abolition Bill be read a second time.
Mr. CALCR AFT wished that the second reading
of the Bill should be referred to next Session.
Mr. WILLIAM SMITH hoped that there would
be same provision in the Bill to protect the Bakers
lagainst malicious informers.
General THORNTON wished the Bill should be
-passed immediately, and that it should extend to all
the country as well as to London, within the bills of
mortality.
Mr. Alderman ATKINS thought that a custom
which existed fOr 700 years should be seriously con-
sidered before it'shonld be abolished. He wished at
least the Bill should stand over to next Session.
Mr. F. LEWIS said, that there was a mass of
evidence in the Report, which went to ;Hove that the
Assize went to raise the !mice of bread. He asked
what credit was due to the Honourable Alderman's
(Smith's) predictions, whin it was recollected bow
mistaken his prophecies were with regard to the Corn?
He would wish to do away the right of search,
though the punishment of selling bread uuder weight
should continue. A total repeal was the only fair
experiment. However he would not press the Bill-to
a Committee till Mooday.
Abair a few words from the CHANC.ELLOR of the
EXCHSQUIdat, Mr. TISIDISY, Mr. Alderman ATKINS.
' Mr. W-- -o, the Bill was read a second