Star.
London, England, 1825-05-13 00:00:00

EAKE'S GENUINE PILLS, justly famous tot
1.4 curing, in all its stages, the VENEREAL DISEASE
One small Pill is a dose, and the taking of one Box, in a recent
case, will soon convince the patient of the certainty of his speedy. ,
recovery. Nothing can be better contrived, more safe,.or more
convenient than this Remedy, for such as are obliged to go journies
or to .iea, as it needs no confinement nor restraint of Diet ; and
ilsty years experience (in an extensive practice) has proved that it
will effect a Cure when repeated Salivation and all utiter methods
avail nothing. For the Scurvy and other Chronica IDisorders,
this Medicine has not its parallel. Upwards of VO,U(X) persons
of both, sexes have been radically cured of the above cruel disor-
ders, within the last eight years. Prepared and sold by the sole
Proprietors, T. TAY LotrAns SON, Members of the Royal Col-
lege of Surgeons, at their House, No. 9, New Bridge-street, in
Boxes of only es. 9d. each, duty included.— N. 13.`rwo back
doors, and Lights in the Passages at night.—They are also sold,
be their appointment, with copious directions, at the Torehqp,.
103,..Oxfordostreet; Mr. Digborotiglis, sNo. 7, Fish-greet-hill,,
neatiteoprialte the Monuthent ; and oy one Person in every, eve.-
' Siderable Town In Great Britain and Ireland.. Advice gratis, ao
Person‘• takingAi-Shove, or oop thcr of the Prrietor's
r 1f .' •
•

f•'
I •

Mr.
Honour,
hereafu
40s. per
for that
Nitembei
abroad,
against the
one of the
maiority
Lord
conceived
pendent'
Mr.
bers cou,
no such
went to
of refor
most si
any Hoi
House .
any practice
Wren tb..
mocker I
could not
without r
S:r J.

Mr.
indepeni
with tin
inces
subdivision
degree correct.

Air.
rid of,
It appe,
ling iceei
were made
answering
.Irish Ge-
After
Lori
tbOse
gi the
rr.
was to
to proterd
advisabi'
the fate

__,..... — . _ .. „,•_,7„,...,...„__ ._.____..r. ,nyeremr.ra,..,_
.• ,
... -
I . ..
~..4
• ....
• 4 . . • per
cent...
_.,
~..f• ' , ~.. .. . . .
... ..
. •
nit....::::24.7.4.........„),, -_...ii..
~
• - ~.„---- 4p.:.„A,-. -rt. :........ _ ,
• !
0 ... • ...•
.. . .
. . .
.1ito: CC '4.. r...
I#l
it:
. etiP4,
2.i..,, ,
.r,%..>,'' . . . 141
a.„" •IC -.-' • .
. li : Wo- +IMO JaTe(t . .
. --.... , t: .
• 7`... • \ k .
5.......:‘....• -
Be.l-.E . . ,
. rrfttE sFvEr,PENcF... ' .
.!
•
„
WORKS RECENTLY PUBLISHED, • been put to him by several Gentlemen within the. 1.1,‘ .
By Baldwin, CRADOCIE, and Joe, London. • • ' two days, and' he should now give a similar answer as
EMOIR of the LIFE and 'CHARACTER he had given to those intetrogations. He co isidered
of the Right Hon. EDMUND BURRO.; with Sped- himself entirely at the disposal of the House inideci ling •
4.:
s Poetry and Letters, and an Estimate of his Genius and whether he should -proved or not.• To those II •n.
ampared with those of his great Contenipnraries. Gentlemen who had voted for the Catholic Bill, on [Fe
By JAMES PRIOR,'.-Fasq. understanding that this ineasute was to accompany i , . .0i
4 . i
rge Vol. Bvo. peke 1.81. With Autographs, and a Portrait. he ftlt himself pledged to forward it wi hoot dci tv.
norq idea of d
untl theqefeuersitiionnsheen •n •io •
HISTORICAL LIFE of JOANNA, QUEEN of
I and COUNTESS of PROV
CE, with correlativementioned P
ned were put to him, ha I he Vie
EN ie
the retent •
eve,ing. If, h %wryer, 1 ; %
• ,
rs
.
the Literature and Manners of Italy and Provence in those Gentlemen, andg it b
particularly
y4the lion. Members for the -
enth and Fourteenth Centuries. In Two Vols. Bvo. with county of Down and the county of Ar ragh, had no objection to ,
• -
the proposed postponement, he should at once accede to let the
Bill sand o'er.
Vignettes, &c. price Xl. ss.
LINING COM M UNINGS with GOD; or, Devotional , .. .
$
ns for every Day of the Year, Translated trent .he ore-.
Colonel FORDE had no obj
ection to the further progress of rite
Initultiabveisihngeddetolarijoivtiil whatthe dwe:iresiothnednaunnothAiernpllberace
fworersetaaffsceordrishaititrt
nan of Christian Christopher Sturm. Author of " Renee-
:.• By William Johnstone, A.M.. The Second Edition, re- • •
improved, in 'Two Vols. copy Bvo. price I Oi• intentions, in case tjte Catholic Bill were ultimately lost?
B ROthWa'tNLlloe Whad(wlnioo • at 'h
%lei
eaisi t
lti
on e
wetst a h I
everi)
in . 4 ,
»S and A DDRES4ES to GREAT PEOPLE t2mo. mr. .
an i saidcis
t addresses have in fact a fund of fun. They remind us
'indar, end sometimes of Colman :--they have almost as coos: nting to the . suggested . postponement of the : I
tour, and they have rather more wit."—New Times. Bill for reAtilwing the Irish Forty-sailli:ig Fieeholds
1
as after what hai paSsed, arid the maturest considers- . i ... , .
iERVATIONS on some of the DI A (..ECTS in the
tion lie could •gioe the subject. he founi •no tenable
!Ur'
f ENGLAND) particularly Somerst•tshire, with a Oloi.
ords stow in use there with Poeiss and other Pieces, r :...,
ing the Dialect. By Ames Jenntoro lion, Sc. Metro- ground on which Emancipation could be longer resisted k ' .
t. Institution. Foolscap tiVo. price 7.. • ' • - (Near, Bever),-whether this measure shou:d be adoptesli r , 'J,..k
not. He defied ally H .nourab!e M:mber who heard .
NMARK DELINEATED; or, Sketches of the Pre- 1 ;.
of that Country; illustrated with Twenty-one Views- .
the speecn of the Honourable and Learnel S ,li.:itorn -
'f,.
aits, after Danish Artists. - liy A. Andersenfeldborg,
Galtral, the other even•ng, while he occupied the very
iversity.of Copenhagen. Royal Bvo. price X 1 1 lsetid.
position at the table whico by ( •••Ir. Brownlow) now ocs- ; 4.
[NG .TOO FAR, a Tale for all Ages. Two Vol!. copied, if there remained a single reason which ought
ce 12s. ' to influence the mind of an enlightened Legislature in ',.,
NOVICE; or, Man of Integrity, from the French of
Three refusing concessions- to the Itnnian Cohobes—(tlear),
. • .
kuthor of " the Gil Bias of the Revolution." I
to. 1 6s. 6d. He would nevertheless su,,,gest the expediency, as a
?.TIC VIGILS.. By Bernard Barton. Foolscap. price Bs. means of rendering such concessions acceptable to the I
EMS. By Bernard Barton. The Fourth Edition, with Protestants. as well as the Catholics of Ireland, and a
litional Pieces, foolscap, Is. 6d.
By Edwin measure of general conciliatior, of proceeding with the k ' k.
MrDSUMMER DAY'S DREAM. - ..., 'Si
ie, Author of " the Lan Days of Herculaneum." With 811 relative to the elective franchise, and that of making
m Designs by Martin, foolocap Bvo. las. a provision for the Roman Catholic Clergy. Haweven, t,,, :•.
WAL, a Poem in Thrie Cantos, with Notes. Small fur himself, be begged to say. that were bptb abandoned, it should a:
da not alter his opinion or-his vote on the .Catholic Qiwatiort—(H •ar), -
, ~,
At present he submitted to the sense, and should 'abide by the course - T.
' . the Hon. Member for Staffordshire might deem best td adopt.
ARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. Mr. LITTLE fON, in answer to the Hon. Membef , • 'ill
--No, . for Down '(Colonel Forde> had merely to state, that if the Catholic. - ts
-
HOUSE OF COMMONS, MAY 12. Bill was &Ay rejected, he should with as much alacrity atiiindon . • .
i,
AWN, of the India House, presented an Account of the the present measure as he had hitherto supported it.
Lord MILTON explained. I
' t
d expenditure of the Bengal Government.
Colonel C. COLE expressed his entire dissent from the t•re- ,
HN BRYDGES presented a Petition from the Noble-
sent Bill. • •
itlemen, and Merchants, of the County of Waterford, in ;1
S.r F. BURDET r expressed his approbation of the , • •
i :. ...!
the Irish Manufactory iill. •
. CAMPBELL presented a Petition from Glasgow, in conduct of the Honourable Member for Armagh, non
~ ;;,
the Leith Dock Bill. . this as well as upon other occasions. HOS rF. B.) felt I f '
ENNEDY took that opportunity of moving, that the evi- not only the necessity of granting Emancipation, but of
'ore the Leith Dock Committee be printed at the expense
conciliating the Protestant interest of Ireland, and with 1 ,
...•
ties. • ft tl,
'EAKER thought the House obliged to the Honourable this object had supported the Bill of the Hogs. Member - !: •
for haying made this motion. A notion had grown up for Staffordshire : lot he was convinced thet- utile s the -.
ie present Session, that parties could have the evidence former were granteJ oh troons to oht tin the latter, the. . , s.,,vt
ommittees printed by their own agents, and at their •sirsou
se was but changing the sides of the difficulty 't had ~.
tnse. Such an ?pinion was erroneous, and the practice a `l.
• j i:.
F privilege. The House-had a responsible Printer, who, to sot mount.'rhe aim ot both measures was, in shOrt; ..
irection of the House, was alone authorised to print the no hing less than the cOnsolidAtion of tl e Empire.— .
igs of Committers, where such a course was sanctioned He,shot Id, however, v. hen the latter Bill came before ',.S
e;;
press motion to that effect, that the charge should be de- them, be able, •he tinnught, to just fy -Lis vote in its •
r the parties. • ,
I aVOttir, on principles-as well as expediency—en a prim-.
inendmeuts to the Carnarvon Railway Bill were read a ! '..
me. . ciple of Reform, which, if r.pplied to a part of this ,
iENISON presented a Petition from the Shipowners and country, would hive a most beneficial effect on our ,' •
As of Southwark, against the Hull Dock Bill.• • ' '''
Represeatat n. , He said this, became independent of
A LTHORP presented a Petition from Manchester, re- •
the great. measure with which it Wia allied, he
Emancipation,
.
the County Courts Bill. ,
L PHILLIPS presented a Petition from the Inhabitants sum ort. the Bill of- the' Honourable Mem-ier ;at the I t 3:1
i
I, in Lancashire, in favour of the same Bill. same time, that having availed himself of the -rotes cf .
SH A W presented a Petition from Persons who had been HOnotiralsle GiStilemen in favour of V
••
lailiffs of the City of Dublin, praying for compensation.
on the faith of the present question being carried as a concomitant; ?.•;.-
MILTON presented a Petition from the Artisans of Sher-
he oil that ground also felt himself bound to give it his vote. He " 6'
•, S gei,
,ying no alteration might be made in the Combination Law i
might add, by way of a parenthetis, that what was called Catholic
ear. . Emancipation was a much mte.e important subject; for in the Re-
IRISH FORTY SHILLING FREEHOLDERS. iief Mu of the Irish Catholics was involved the paramount object • 1 ,
GRATTAN presented a Petition from the County of of Religious Liberty in this coutory—( Hear, hear). . • .
_
an, against the Bill before the House for the regulation of Mr. R. MARTIN thought if this Bill passed without the mea-
tive Franchise in Ireland. sure of Emancipation, it would be the severest visitation on Ireland,.
S. RICE conceived- this Petition to be founded and calculated to produce a rebellion in that country.—The Pe-
mtire misconception of the facts to which k re. tition was then read, and ordered to be printed. . .
The object of the Bill was to equalise the rights Mr. J. SMITH presented a Petition from the Landowners and
tople of England and Ireland. The measure was, in point
Inhabitants of Connaught, respecting the making of roads at d
in extension of the right of suffrage, and not an Infringe- other public works.
Sir N. COLTHURST presented a Petition front the. People i f o. •
popular privileges. Cork, against certain clauses of the Salmon Fishery Bill, now be-
GRATTAN would be perfectly satisfied if the
-
re in alt respects the same in the two countries, but did not fore the House.
Mr. L. FOSTER objected to the Bill on the part of senate
'the present measure of such a tendency. Millers on the River Boyne, upon whom it would impose the ne-
HUME said the oprati n of the Bill of the cessity of erecting expensive works.
sable Member for Stafford, would be to prevent Mr. HU ME presented a 'Petition front certain Victuallers re-
ter all votes from persons having an interest of also k Petition front Glasgow and its
spurting the Beer Duties; .
neighbourhood in favour of the Catholic Bill.
:t• annum, derived from leasehold propel ty, and Sir. HUME presented a Petition front several thousands of the
it reason had-his opposition. The Honourable operative Cotton-spinners of Oldham and its neighbourhood agairot •
er wished to correct an errpr which had got any hasty alteration in the Combination Laws.—Referred to the
I, namely, that on the late division he'had voted Committee on the said Laws.
the Catholic Bill. He had done no such thing—he formed
Mr.o U RTE. IS presented a Petition from Rye, in Sussex, again t
he majority which passed that Bill, and he only wished the any alteration in the Corn Laws—Laid on the table.
Sir H. PARNELL presented•a Petition from certain Irish Be- • ,
P were ten times greater than it proved. I
porters and the London Importers of Butter, complainieg of the
d A LTHORP supported the Bill, because he state of the laws relative to that article.—Ordered to be printed.
• • .
ed it would make the Constituency of Ireland more hide- Sir J. NEWPORT presented a Petition front the Farmers is i t,
than it was at present. the Counties of Waterbed and Kilkenny against any alteration in
LLTTLETON wondered how Honourable Mem- the Butter Laws
, F,
mild call this it Bill of Disfranthisement. It was A similar Petition was presented front New Crito4 Ireland.-- , 1 0
.h thing ; it preserved all existing rights, arid only Ordered to be printed.
ersons the friends hlr. GtMILIJURN presented a Petition front the prisoners of
P
•
o prevent future abuses. Of all
the Four Court! Marabalsea of Dublin, praying forstke atioptiu i
of such regulations as prevailed in the King's Bench prison.-1.4.1 •t;
rem were those from whom he should expect thel 'z,
strenuous support for this measure. He put it to on the table. 4,
lonourable Member oho held his seat in that ELECTIVE FRANCHISE BILL. 4 f
by the unbiassed suffrage of the speopl•, whether On the motion of Dr. Puirineone the Order of the Day on the • '
''.•
ctice which went to divide the whole right of election be-
Elective Franchise Bill was postponed to the 27th inst.
three or four Proprietors of a County would not be a• . LABOUR. ERSS WAGES. /
.
°°
yof real representation? In justice to his own Constituents he Mr. MONCK, pnrsu.tnt to notice, moved for leave .
....
at allow the opinions which had just been stated, to go abroad to bring in a Bill to enact that labourers shall be pa d 4 :',:l
t contradiction.
• NEWPORT defended the Bill, no pact of their wages out of the P'tt'r' Rates. The •
STURGES BOURNE was friendly to the Bill, Hon. Member proceeded to point out the many evils consequent en
endent of any connection which it might have I
this misapplication of the Poor Laws. Oise of them was the in- - r
ducement to industry which was taken away by it. The mai ti_d
la 5‘,.
:he Catholic QuesVon. One of the greatest gi iev- man received front the Poor Laws cons)der ably more thin Die bid. I :
under which Ireland suffered was the extreme gle man could possibly earn by the mese labotious industry. Im-
, t
some of property—an evil which this measure would in soe provident marriages wive thus eiteAur-iged, mud the evils incident. i •
correct, thereto were multiplied to'-great extent. %
. MONCK was of opinion, th.it if we ought to get Mr. J. BENET I said, he did not mean to object to the intro- .
fictitious votes the measure ou ht to be unreal. r 4
auction of this Bill, but be could not see how the Hontito able _
gg . '
, ember could cony his Bill into effect without doing away alto-- ,
.. -.
seated to him that the real o'...jecticn to forty shit- gether with the Poor Laws ? . .
reeholders inireland was their independence. They Sir GEORGE CHETW YND said he believed the object of
nade voters to serve the purposes of their landlords, but not the Honourable Member'. Bill was already illegal; it Jul a ..t - •
ring that object, and fo lowing the dictates of ,their Clergy, therefore require any new enactment to make it so. In the'
. .4- . •
ientlemen supported their abolition, ministration of the Poor Laws much must depend upon the re:oat:it
• •
it a few words in explanation from Mr. Rica and Mr. MONVE, Gentlemen.
'
rd MILTON pbserved, he could not agree with Mr. AIONCK observed, that whether the practice in question
was illegal or not, it had prevailed fur many years past.
wl.o did not consider this Bill a dissanchi.ement, .
Leave was then granted.
: same time that on other aiounds it had his sap- . .
• IRISII CURREVCY. '
His (Lord Milton's) object, bower/ r, in rising,
The House resolved itself into a Committee on the Cutrevey •
••
i ask the lion. Member for Staffordshire whether he intended
Acts. ,
geed with the Bill this evening, or whether it would not be
Mr. WALLACE proposed a resoluti:ll, with a view •
ble to postpone the further consideration of the measure sill
Fe of Catholic Bill in another place was ascertained ? of assAnilatieg the Cur, cue of Ireland %ids that of • •
L LITTLE lON, its reply to the guts ion .of the England. Ile should• p opost that all futnre•n ntr cts
ills, id, begged to say-that the. sane quesiioc ha.l be made-with seterence to BRitish Currency ; the ruts, -
.:- . . • ,
• .
•