Star.
London, England, 1823-06-12 00:00:00

. . .
• . . D'T Cern . ..
E.-7'. • r, 441).,...p.
•
, . ,1/4. '• - • 4'. . . :Ai- ;.r- A. A ~; ~
": ,7:17-
.!-/-./‘Glo#-..-._7 • .
. .
~ .
,: . tillt, , . 4k.r. ftir)4:lyi '-' •
"elk, .4tiis .
, .
~t •
Nki . .
tlri ‘llo.* ,a . tlf;Vittlin4,(4
4:4•110-. itir:!lP
• , ii
_4' ie-e-iielf.adir...c_,' .
. ._

-4 1A4% SAVAI.I4 1 igtO C

• "snictinrit or sil4lll.
I Mr. wirciA:ms said, the intended rhOtion of
Honourable Friend, the Member for Westminster,
.respecting the recent enquiry Into the conduct of the
Sheriff of pUbliu, would not, on account of 000-
tinued illness of the Honourable Daronekdel brought
before the HOuse doting the present Seitioni
therefore begged permission to withdrew thE ndtiSe
which erbod for to•inorrow.
• t
• EpITAIJILLIA Abil 111.ErtAt BILL.
The Order of the Day for the third feuding dl' t 1
Snitaliields Acts Repeal Bill was then moved by Kr.
LIVSICISSOV.

The LORD MAYOR objected to the hdrry with
c‘hich the Bill was carried forward;
_ _

Mr. MONCK said a few words against the VIII
hut from the confusion which prevailed in the Heine
during the observations of the Horn Gentleman; he
was not heard in the gallerY.
Mr..HUSKISSON supported the measure.
already been discussed, and not a shadow of an ob•
jection existed to the proposed repeal.
The LORD MAYOR moved that the Bill be res
-committed. He wished that an opportunity might
be afforded this class of men-to turn their attention to
sonic other sot tof occupation. The•ini mediate effect
of passing the Till would be to thrilw.nuniheis out of
employment. He thought the. Petition. should to
!mad before a Committee concluded
by moving, That the Bill be read a third time that
day six months."
A Metrattn, whose name we could not learn, se-
conded the amendment.
Mr. W. SMITH said, that for the satisfaction of
the Petitioners he wished.that more consideration had
'been given to. the desires of the Petitioners, and
that the measure should not pass mull they were coo-
t/bleed of its. utility.
• lir-GURNEY said,he regretted that the proposition
,of his son. riend the Member for Wey mouth did
not meet the approbation of the Hati,e. He would
support the amendment of tile Lord Msyr.v. . •
Mr. BENNET supported the amendment. The re-
gestations which it was proposed to remove ha l the
good effect of preventing the• trade from accumu-
lating too much in the metropolis, and of distributing
it over the country.

Mr. RICARDO contended that they were not le.
gislating to the injury of the workmen. The measure
was more in favour of them than of the masters. It was
said that there never was occasion to refer to Ma-
gistrates. He knew of ten or twelve instances of it.
When the Sill passed there would be more work than
nom, and the wages would nut fall. Not one good
reason had been• given for dela% ing the Bill a moment.
Mr. P. MOOItE opposed the B:11. The Petitioners
in support of it-were guilty-of con:bin:it ion. This he
could peeve, -Their object was-to deft soil the work-
,men, and the moment the Bill passed the workhouses
would be filled with, them. This must be the effect,
unless the Combination,. Ater; were oiepealed at the
same time. The master; were greatly 6eceived if thty
thought they could get' the work done at a cheaper
rate than at present..--(Cries of Qmestiort). ~If he de-
layed the House fill seven o'clock he could not see
Coventry sink. as it must if the Bill passed. .
. Mr. BRIGHT sail, the question qjvolved the in-
terest of the lower cla.ses very onterially. He did
net know whether the Petitioners went right or wrong;
but their case should be enquired into. Heregretted
' that he allowed the Bill to pass through .so many
stages without itnakisih• tety.observation on. it. The
Committee ofthe Rome oa.erds did not recommend
the repeat of the spitalfields Actt. Them 'Acts gave
rise to no dissention, .unless a peaceable appeal .to a
Magistrate could be tailed bythat name. The work,
men were contented, and the trade was ea the.-in-
'evince. • *lll', fliceelbre;-horry cm .the measurer' le
upter:: hivettipasios It -should .apptear ta-lor beak-
fieiali be went& give it his support. ::
M. KUME 'lead an et.tract from thin-port of the
Committee of the House of Lards of 26th Jane, 182 i,
statink that the Spitaltlelds laws were-injurious to the
aratleiben, and must ultimately prove ruinous unless
some alteration were made in them. lie did not
y:ettl to any Mtn in zeal for the interests of the wot k-
men, but he was supporting their intebinsAsy voting
for this .Bill. • . • • -
lime some radial impel flad kallery door cried out
T4seppurt-the poor We'd/frt." ~
. '. all CUR Wf >I .10am/sited slid amendment.
:24r:IELLICE hoped, is the ltistit Hon. Mt-miser
(bilts theskiisottl was determined to press on the Rill,
gars he irifild give the poor Petitioners: the. consoia-
. tient ofien:astiarancethat,he would propose the repeal
of the etinshipation theta wit 41,e9iion.
blrjilii•KASSObi-said, Were emu a Measure on
.risk. sobjetst 'already balms she amid. fle was as
enemy tmstor principle Of she Combination Laws, and
was Roils tauty too ailnricahac the subjeet-should be
ineestigiatedv adult ..the • opinion which bad been
' state* by choßiget•Honorirable the Chief Magistra:e
of the City of London, that if the Hai was repealed
muchsiraischief atoeuld• ensue (tom it, and that tLe
'. persons fhb's- iaterestAd3,in she question Might be lei
into excessodin donsequelace. But be (Mr, Iluskis.
son) nisersay, on.liell elf of that numerous and ind us-
• Irides class, the operatirt %stovers octSpitalfield,,
tirit thisnaghout the
,ntruty comtnenications whit li he
had hail *eh:demi ghet had nanifested a full Lic-
a ire to•descisuithe question with calmness and m.)dc-
zicatiOn. bid Ws himself in senat.ilektet called orcts
,Y•to say, that, intfitiaging forward the Bill/101W been
11.4 inguersodi by no qther motives than tlwite of publ:c
(JaEluty. The bill had caused him much anxiety, al-
k though be wasperfctly uninterested ni.itostrecess or
• rejection, farther. than that he eutertaintd a convic-
tion that
ene fa tohe try
it .wa:caclocuuniateLr produce macb, and
solid bHear,
hear)„..
. Mr. COOPER, supported the Bill, hest saw- op tea-
- son why the repeal of the Combination sketebould
be a simulteneous measure. . . . .
:The Lona NIAYOII and 341 r. Eiztcz explained.
Mr. P.-:%100RE rose to say one word.= dm sub-
.- .. .
. ••-.., t- :. • i, •,,,,.,, .? .i,
.., ..