Star.
London, England, 1807-06-30 00:00:00

-

• .
•
Lord GRENVILLE thought that if htiuifters had tendtred4 •
fome loch meafure is the prefeot neceffary by the abrupt &Sok- '
Ow of Pa/Harnett, that it ought Calle takes up no as edit*
and general principle, rather than the tints of the Hoare-ern,
ployed at this period in examining the cireuniftances of cult puts '
vidual cafe.
.
Lord HAWKESBURY was of °pinto n that it would be more
advifable to examine the eireutt ftancesof each cafe, in order that I
they might difeover in what inftances relief might be afforded to
parties, with as little deviation as rabic from the itandint or •
dens of the Houfe.
Lord HOLLAND fupported the opinion of Lord Gronvifte.
On the motion of the LORD CHANCELLOR, thee Lords
were ordered to be futunioned fur to-morrow.
ADMINISTRATION OF,WAIFICI IN !CoTLASID.
Lord GRENVILLE prefesocid tyeit one fo' introducfrog
Trial by Jury in certain cuff cafes fifffeitiand,, and the better or
regulating the Courts of Jiatice hi 'that country. His I.ordh*
briefly adverted to the nrogrefsorthis meafure in the left
meat, and obferved that the raw fusion exifted new for the taca•
lure, which rubElled•then,NOistkij °bled hid bees generally
approved of in Scotland. .
The LORD CHANCELY.OR•titaintaned his former opinion
with rerped to this metfure. He•ehbtefrint,inteadedalfo to pro-
pole his Bills, which, . toget er. With ti c., Noble Lord,
Knight go to the countp ais.he courideredmre cited, retie* to.
the next &Mon, as it Avas.inintifftble trils,mea ors could be raft***
through in the preint Sefton. ' It Was,boitteier;'his intentron,
the courfe of the week, to mikalitone propoGdon to their Lord-'
(hips rtfpefting the Randle% orders relative to Appeals, with,the ,
view of doing more rptisdy, jallite toluitore than could at prerept,
be done.
After fome further obfervations from Lord GRENVILLE.rhd,
LORD CHANCELLOR,•the Dukeq( ATHOL.ationbc
LAUDnRDAI .1, the Bills were ordered to hepristind.
Adhoosued 1121 to-scorrow (tide day.),. , . •
• :.t
4;:llUat OF. t QMMCIi49° - „
WS. ROMlLLlf.obtobuiti deivU to bring in a iiin *tilt MISS •
dfcetually (caring thopoyment.of ofdua by" traders.
Mr. BANKES moved that the litfolation of the Houk of
14th of March, be read, which-being done, be moved for leave to
being in a Bill to prohibit the granting of. Offices In reverftonf or
for joint livei, with benefit of furvivorthin.- '4' • •• 4
• Sir J. NEWPORT faid, that In the number of Places which be
had lift Selion moved logien' ahollated, there was one ailed the
Surveyor of the StiverKenotare, -which bad beep granted to. Sir.
Boyle Roach, and a Mr. Aylmei, on tevedion. It wits a Mere*
rineenre, sod had, by a" millakeorthe Cottuniffierners of Inquiry,
been left out of the I ft. *Me wrectionedibli tit afar( the Hanle'
that it had not been any ale of anct he looped that loose
provifion might be made in thbiflift„by whii:k this Welds office
might be aboliffied.
Mr. HERBERT fold, that * very extenftve praftice of (mu
Ong, had, to his knowledge, prevailed oh die river Kenmore, and
he thought an ofEee of this kind would do great fetvice in bpi
preffing Inch prodUce.
Lord H. PETTY allowed that (ichen office. ifproperly coat.'
toted, might do fervice, but not by being granted to a Baronet al-
ways refiding in Dublin, and doing nothing towards the prevention
or fuppreifion of fmsggliug. He thought, therefore, It ought to be
abulithed.
Ms HERBERT explained.
Sir A WELLESLEY Paid, it was an office granted by a former
Go vernment, and he thought therefore it was rather an office more
to be regulated than abolithed.•
Altera few words of explanation from SirJOHN NEWPORT,
Mr. Boukca's motion was agreed to.

..

IL
•• 4.1

#