Star.
London, England, 1822-05-01 00:00:00

DISSOLUTIONS OF PARTNERSHIPS.

Simpson and F,Arles, Shoredkch, haberdasher. Young and
Stainbank, 'Change-alley, timber-brokers. Shanklin and Cu.
Liverpool, carriers. George and Williams,Newport, Mon-
mouthshire, crial-merchants. Lowry and SOwerby, Gateshead,
.Durham, manufacturers. Barron and Young, Glamford Briggs,
Liucolnshire, braziers. Cooper and Lewis, Sheffield, drapers.
J. and W. Harrison, Little INloorfields, veterinary-surgeons.—
Masey and Hill, I ristol, mustard-manufacturers. Scott and Co.
Reading. Wallis and l'hornhani, Sculcoates, Yorkshire, whale.
bone-cutterr. Lansell and Mathews, Margate, grocers. Nelson
and I'billips, King's Arms-yard, Coleman-street, packers.

PARLIAMENTARY PAPER.

. ' .

An Official Return to an Order of the House of
Commons of the monthly arrivals of Corn into the
Port of London, for the last three )ears, gives the
following totals:
WIICAT.—TotaI quarters for the year 1819: British, 5190,416;
Foreign, 143,036. For the year 1820: total quarters; British,
399,0119 ; Foreign, 237,508. For the year 1821 : total quarters,
British, 404,828; Foreign, 35,174.
BA RLZY.—Total quarters for the year 1819: British, 217,983;
Foreign, 165,804. For the year 1820: British, 248,031 ; Fo-
reign, 6235. For the year 1821: British, 253,825; Foreign, 8245.
MALT.—For the year 1819: total quarters, British, 162,406;
Foreign, none. For the year 1820: total quarters, British,
193,966; Foreign, none. For the year 1821: total quarters,
British, 216,220 ; Foreign, none.
Oars.—For the year 1819 total quarters, 13ritisb, 547,915;
Foreign, 359,775. For the year 1820: total quarters' British,
718,490 ; Foreign; 432,036. For the year 1821 t total quarters,
British, 695.974; Foreign, 49,663.
Bro.—For the year 1819: total quarters, British, 1007 ; Fo•
reign, 4825. for the year 1820: total quarters, British, 1063;
Foreign, none. For the year 1881: total quarters, British, 9312 ;
Foreign, none.
Banns.—For the year .1819: total quarters,. British, 40,885
Foreign, 118,511. For the year 1820: total quarters, British,
69,923 ; F6relgn, 4710. For the year 1881: total quarters,
British, 108,6117 ; Foreign, none.
pans.—For the year 1819 total quarters, British, 34;283 ;
Foreign, 13,819. For the year 1820: total quartetsi British,
47,278 ; Foreign, 2945. tot the year 1891: total quarters,
British, 52,353 ; Foreign, none.
It is reported in the fashionable circles, that the-
Hon, GEORGE Bnowst.ow will 'shortly lead to .the
hymeneal altar, Lady MARY BUGH, ehleA daughter
of the Earl of "

!HANCELLOR - • •tisii *hit
• v!af of 101)0Feanca; Wined MI
the 1/4 .dry the Won. OA ;earned Gentk:ntan at thalmoment.
-.......: ~,sri„ Mr. ELL ICE sAldi'lhit Geeing the Noble- hirequishi2:
_ _. . ~....,..,..: 1 jAace, he'vehhed to poi frPipsiellateM him, tonellting the
in which tide Montry.stoid ill tile.' Independenalemeeseinents. of
South Anusicia It was flat *Dumber.*** fahohou
Mint by 'attains for Inforrqpiatie • bee Mihe
,rdekie
'Lord wat-in a dteadatild rill ', ne- epee the point, it Int
•gratitydriehneek oinefliiir ' 'a,•• Mk on-iraf t
.%Tete it tirthr!hurstl-at..tr's.o.4„imighissliskr= the
.4rs 411,1141$ Southiltrt* nett,.
..mend; vernin3r Ame-iiia t • • . ta . ~, . •
-- The "of LONDONDERRY 7 -ale new intly
i
aletAlheila at. America, the: :es* 'Kt Could. Ist
f eta pt - . idliti beiveken-theirt4l ei;and the To-
anlloPiltr• ,die
vialopev
~:.
aa.allie
cciiratry ariir Situth America, ins liighs Hoii: Prieintill.rati4 Bill • • -
before the House, which was to regulate the trade of ihis touii
try with aliparts•of the world; • .•• . . s •
Mr. PEEL presented a Petition froM the UnifitrsitYlbf Olt-
deSiner, The.
thLoLuTglhitilitliiiet
ford, against any farther concessionsao the Roman eaelsolies.
to,'
ettoi.tget:atrhdaiagtht•dstistnrteon_ed
een..cep-
licelserE ll`lidy
dition of the agricillteral bocarsia seholly.'engrossed the attent4n
.any of the-People,•that they were-not itt a situatibn to attend almost
the Go- to any other concern: To this cause, he wished the flousolo
tented them consider, was to be attributed the fewnenof the Petitions pre-
.,,t,, lie was re., rented against the 'matron of the Right Honourable Gentle map:
. to labour unretuit- . He owned he trembled for the effects of the Right Honourakle
.„ obnoxious and oppres.•Gentleman's eloquence ilpon this quatton. He was himseff in
at, Lord Sidmouth, indeed instance of the captivations of the. Right Honourable Gentle-
.. hope, that that tax should be man's powers; for on a former night, when the qeestion of Pal-
ace. The promise ought now to be lianlentara Reform was to be brought Mote the Hansel he had
come down fUlly•preeared Id ;dote for the' motion of the Noble.
4. that the mode in whith the Lord ; but the speech of the Right Hon. Gentleman completely
-od most essential objec- changed his opinion—(A liffigh).-.—Gentlei ei might consider
Dressed !owe an this,* subject of merriment, but he was one•who thought that
' -ather Tee. every min ought io forM his judgments upon ti_ arguments he
1.,in0 • should hear. He wished, however, to guard the ileuse against
that-power to which he was a-victim; lest aaly one 'Might be led
;grey from the right path of his.dety. a: He had 'yielded to tele
Right lion. Gentleman's eloqeence* still heleit persua4ed that
the House-would do well to attend to the growing fetainsa of
the People in favour or Reform—(llear, heir).=-Aritons to
calidop the:House against the Right Hon. Gentleman', dd.'
qisence, hewished On make this stator Apt. •• t• : .. ... •.'
Mr. SCARLE Fr said, notwithstanding what the Hon.
Baronet' had said against admitting Roman Cathilic Peers to •
Parliament, when he should-bier leurd the sl'eech of tie' Right
Hon: Gentlemaa there- was mOnle reason to exeeet that lit Would
votewlih those who faioured the 'motion.."—The Petition was
read and ordered to.lie on the: title. • I.
Mr„ PEEL presented a r
respectable;
from Iraisley, signed ~by
7,,500 persozis. many of them-highly and also Peti-
tions from .atasgow and various -ether' placet,• against alter.- •
ing .the law with respect to Roman Catholica.=—Ordered to lie
on the table. -. •
• • i%rr. COKE presented Petitions from two of the Htindre • di
ienveNad'orfheolit, cootralaatiineeingteefheAtheetcuctifilteeald'iDthieuedst..tet He dairisdcrsecornd.
The CAIMIIRi
LLO of‘ die. 1:36Ci11-Al explained
*Ca he-IM toetatclelr s'ald as fo (hi relief to *be afforded. by the
' fatilstion of taxatitieleZaThe Petition was read, and ordered to
'-e,peinted. . :17: .• . • .*
Colonel DAVlRS'preeeMed a Petition from gie Tanners of
.ne Qty of - Worcester, praying for the remission of half the
Duties ort-Leather.—Ordere.l to be printtd.
of Tb ti - •• , but he was
for past sir tee by a sort nne con- Window Duties, from the sth Jan. 1792, to sth Jan. 1822, and
Mr. 110B1IOUSE moved for 'Returns of the House and
silica that this scheme, when it came to be analysed, would not
meet with the approbation of the House, and to that source they
took this opportunhy of giving notice, that he would bring for-
motion for the repeal of those Hodes on Wednesday,
dered to be printed.
could look, for no relief.—The Petition was then read, and or-
ward
May 22.—The Retail-re; were ordered.
Mr. JAMES presented a Petition, very numerously signed„ewspaper Stamps had not been complied with, and movedt Lord J. RUSSELL complained, that his motion respecting .
N
from certain Manufacturers, . Merchants, Bankers, arid others,
a Return should be made forthwith. ,
Inhabitants of Carlisle, praying fora revision of the Criminal that,
fhe C ' .
II ANCE I . LOR of the EX C H EQUER stated some
Code. He (Mr. James) was persuaded that no subject was a
difficulties to have laid in the way'of nicking the Return.
greater importance than that to which this Petition referred.—
Lord J. RUSSEL said,'' •
I. no difficulty had lain in the way or
The Petition was ordered to be printed.•
a.
Mr. RAMSDEN presented a Petition from the Tanners, making the Return lst year.
Mr. 'IL M E thought it siegolar that the Return hid not been • Curriers, and others, concerned in the Leather Trade, in the
given here, when an order tit the tame nature had been corn,. neighbourhood of Doncaster, praying for the repeal of the Lea-
plied with to the letter in Scotland.— the Return was ordered
tiler Tex.—Ordered to be printed. .
Mr. ABERCROMBY brought up-the Report of the Corn- s° be made forthwith • • •
mister on the Caledonian Asylum, which was agreed to, and a ADMISSION OF ROMAN CATHOLIC PEERS
Bill orelered. .. ~......... _. ,_ . ,
INTO PARLIAMENT.
The lion. and Learned Gentleman then presented a Petidoa
.. •
from the Tanners and.Curriers of Edinburgh, praying for di ••
Mr. CANNING said, in rising to makethat motion
repeal of the Leather Tax.-Ordered to be printed. ' of which he hid given notice, could he convey-to the.
Mr. DO.WNIE presented a Petition from the Royal Burgh of naittdt•Ot those Who heard" him; ' the least portion Or
Stirling.. against admitting Roman Catholics to places of greater the conviction which
Ordered to be printed. tvis.imi
to fill. '
teased on his mind and-
trustand power than those which they were at present eligible . .
hi conscience of the kistice and expediency of the
Lord A'LTHORPE presented a Petition from the Raw Hide measure which he *as about to propose, be should
Salesmen of Leadenhall Market, praying for the repeal of the approach the question with a confidence such as on
Leather•Witx.--Ordered to lie on. he table. . . no former occasion he had ever exerienced. • And
Lord STaiiiii.EY presented a Petition from the Tanners re- • p
siderd in' the town of Preston, praying for the repeal of the if he approached it now with fear-with much of
Leather Tax. lietegged to say, that it was not his intention to agitation And anxiety, it was because he was sure that
support the repeal of the Leather Tax against the repeal of the it (which he trdsted would not k the case) his pre..
Salt TaX,:or the repeal of the Salt Tax against the repeal of the positiosr should-fail, he hid no refuge in the weakness
Leather 'T,sx. .He would support the repeal of both, and be of
the • 'th ''' - ' 'f• • - - • ti- 'di'
canes, or e paucity o , argnments— ut e
woulaireserfor the remission or any Other tax, respecting which . . .
a modowikould be Made, 'until he saw that the taxation of the disappointment must 'only resole from the inability
country bill been very considerably ditidnished.—The Petition of the advocate. Before he proceeded to state-the
was received and ordered to lie on the table. . • • grounds on which he thought the 'House would. do
Sir J. SEBRIGHT presented a Petition from the Town of .. •‘•
well to allow a Bill to be broutit in for the removal
llitchin, in the county of Hertfoid, praying fur a revision of the . . • •
Penal Code.=Ordered to be printed. of the disibiluies under'which' °nun CaihOlipFeeri
Gemini tI•ASCOINE presented' a Petition from the Tan- laboured as ft) votes and seats ill PArliament, ifmight
.
;era and other Inhabitants of Liverpool, against the Leather
be' expedient to 'ettcleavbtie to femOve,.•come of ' the
Tax.—Ordered to be panted. . . .
Partial' and prelibiinary 'objectiOns•'that Ave% been
Mr. H. DRUMMOND presented Petitions from tbe Synod' • • ; 4 •
of Perth and Stiiiing, and horn' Deming, in the county Of Stir- i taken there and eh.ew here, rather td ilmf9rna thin
ling, against the admission of Catholic Peers into Parliansera.= the substance-of his motion; Wltin'!ie caul Rut. of
Ordered to lie on the table. • • • • • ' doors, he 'meant that' which pa...sed. '- - the ' •
Mr. BENNET moved for a Return.of all, Pensions granted current of conv . ersation •
to Persons retiring, on the abolition of situations in the Tax ,
Officn.—Ordered. 1 that which had just beet
Mr. SYKES postponed his motion relating to the Tallow (Sir Thomas' Lethbridge,
Duties to a future day. He understand, the Noble Marquis •to attempt to attain an nil'
say on the night before' that it was intended to remit ow mil- !
general quotiliti;'but cr
lion eight' hundred ibousand pounds of taxes:. He owed, it „,_L
therefore to the Noble Lord, to wait until his plan would be , ilawct°rY alit, was a.nOl:
fully dtve:oped. • • . i ingon this erne)tion 'die's
Mr. SCARLETT said,,that as a question of the greatAt ini- prejudiced ; he tn}d hoped
portauce was before the House that night, he would content -have ball nced ' tad' %lies.'
himself with merely asking leave to ,bring in a Bill to preveut
was a step.ln'aitabte, it',
the retnoval of the poor, and poiaphifilhe discussion to the se-
cond reading.-,•Leave writhe° given to bring in the Bill. but it. it'Wii ;E'rejudice
Mr. GRisNFlLLloasked, if in the arrangement for the re-•on. L-I
Baronet ookti to If
newal of the Dank char:ter,* was intended ea nenette-a clause iii- rei ••.- • - I.7'i --1.
app iensinto 0 to stmi
trodided fur the first time in, the year liphithand which was to ..;
‘,.....,,
y to attrillt.thif
the etreei following :—That tie Batik' aould enjoy an the psi- ..as *eddy
shales emoluments, andaadvantages *bleb' sissy-vii'rE in 'pos. oneiloultilbe'U'ttip'to-
evesietia by virtue of-any employment in beheff Melia-Public ; lion ; litatniticli,Jl in*
and, was it ahn intended to cqaciptis the grant ofaCKlOO.• year parts the *id btv ii
, remo • nn
to the Bank, which hitherto went under the denogination. of ' ' • - -Ley' •
, diffiCtlitiesf itt.hOnor - re
hOuee-monev ? .
1 dfint ttle
The ell A?.feltLLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, at no, a 41e Vie 2,enetsT
,
- 4........ • :..ii.ii,:i) :a., ioG e....T As --- • ,-•


kith passed itt the common
; and of these thi44was
rei,e;tied by the Trion.liarf:
,e), that this wits.nit:ilis4ll6un . I
nconscioas decision upon tte
connected with that, and eon. I
Athet ob; cetibn, (hat by bring-
e'geheial question would be.
these objections would
101 ti if lerlatr hi proposed;
tTc °Uhl
.04• be pr,ejudiieL •
:e to the general • cityse,
fiktil it ,insteacrig:expteinuso
ccess-; ili onb IlieSkinfie‘l, he
it theisiiccess of this.p4rtial
thcf,,siitfAs,Cif the
~ infierisues.
jausisting of tuany
k'detrae)64lfrpro itA,nintscrical
iriripeci he unticipaseti ;midi
Ott cktiesti6N--namely, .
, •
•

Fir .
114