Star.
London, England, 1823-07-01 00:00:00

MARRIAGES ABROAD.

Lord HOLLAND addressed the House. He stated
that be understood , there was a Bill now upon their
Lordships table, for rendering valid such marriages
as had been solemnized in Russia since the dissolution
of the British Factory. The principle of the 13i11 cer-
tainly had his entire consent, as far as it went ; but
he wished the same principle of validity to be ez-
tended to all marriages in foreign countries, such befog
once solemnized in the houses or Chapels of our'Am-
bassadors. This was demanded by justice, by wisf,
dom, and by policy ; and, as the laws of England
were founded on those principles, he hoped and
trusted that measures would forthwith be taken in or-
der to remove all suspicion of the validity of .Our
..
marriages in foreign parts. This placed the families,
of persons who married abroad in rather a perilous
state; and when it was seen, during this Session, due
so numb of the marriage contract had been taken from
the common law, and placed in the Statute Book, he
hoped that at least some distinct pledge' or rather;
some solemn dictum, would be given by Parliament
so as to lay this subject of disquietude more com-
pletely at rest. He hoped, that considering the dis-
via t and jealousy which attend the solemnization of
matrimony when abroad, same declaration to the con-
trary would be.notified this Session, as preliminary
to some enactment in the next, He hoped that the
time was not far off when the law itself would
re-
move all doubts respecting the marriages of British
subjects in foreign parts.
Lord COLCHESTER agreed with all that had
fallen from Noble Lords upon the subject of provid-,
log for the validity of -English •Marriages in foreign
parts. He hoped that another Session• would ndt be•
suffered to elapse without the passing of a decla-,
zatury law upoo to.lmppoortant a subject. ;
The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, le concurred with:
tl.e Noble Marquis (Lansdown), and his noble Friend
(t..clichester), on the cross bench, with regard to reaJet-
ing quite ralichhe marriages of British subjects when

disparagement m,-.A`•l
. _.
abroad. He apprehended thet ikw
seen nizetincißl4firla Mt ,
arskead Y a lit!! ;00.er r.t"Ste
- ift.iages s :;,;,•_, slmparseop.,t rest upon the res 4 u. ;FLIT!WfWe
brills itisli ate' My My, a etherefite /ski t eoslegnasst, if indiganw
A ' h.
:flcltetgi: ' • ab/4redieivs of fo-; -tie* tist,;siarfantable in nsylitelf„at't* language POO
j' . in nf itst
,itlf
eb
reign Stakes, shell parties then.
~
It
1
residint theh-e, were by some professional men 4isewbere,whee mention is,
e observed made of the non-effect -of appCalina from ,tke, Lord,
siOd here. But titer Lotddnpit utast v it
distinctground; Chancellor in his own Court to the Lord Chancellor
that the present Bill went upon a
~
..,, .
proceeded on *suned prinei.p ,
'MC • Te That Marriages inthis rinse
H e the-Noble. and-Learned Lord
,which, though nominally as
41, to 'tussle, instanced the cases in *
had been quasi as in England, with reps; _
• such marriages being solemnized by. thnOn
plain of
Appeals from the Cm:l.a Charkcembe had nothing
el lto do but
Is* from the
' the British Factory in Russia; and;here...accor ing y, . sign; as,, or
"pp
the question to be affirmed was, whether- such mar- Vice-Chanceliox andjtltOlaster of ;Ole 11,ons).—And
• • valid when the Factory had been put an can your Lordshjps.
,once..aiippoe. that , any. Inn,
stages were
entire end to, though solemnized by the Chaplainper holding 'the high' and re:Tonsil:4 trust of Lord Chats :
' se? If, therefore, the measure could be agreed en.by cellor would not corneteveu foam hisown jurisdiction-
' their Lordships, it might be better to apply it, in to this House, the 'dangler . revert or justice, with a
future, to all such marriages when solemnized in con" mind open to conviction, and anxious to correct pre-
formity with the laws of foreign States. conceived errors?' It is to be 'numbered .as aniong4t
my misfortunes, Lards that I have always sou ht '
The Earl of LAUDERDALE held the question of alr .A . , . . g.
marriages to be distinct, when solemnized by the En- information, that I,lievekept.an.open ear to c.oneic7
iron, th' I h '.
at I. bane been foremost to admit and aFictigy- '
glish Factory Chaplain, or, on the other hand, by the.
Chaplain to the Embassy. ledge truth,: from whatever:quarter it came. , I can
that suppose, too well, that persons May talk -lig , htly-itt'
The LORD CHANCELLOR here remarked, Westminster Hall, who never set foot in the Court of
it remained a question with himself; how far the most
Chancery, and know nothing of. the business to be
doubting men would even haie entertained thedoubts
transacted there; but, I
.t.it, cap ever
.such. per-
expressed by some of their Lordships, had the Itlarri eke
sons think that an individual in the elevated', but re-
laws remained as they were; but it was clearly r
sponsible situation of Lord Chaticeller,, woold
,refuse
the:r Lordships to decide whether the present Bill
to correct an opinion he had formed in error? ' it is
should or should not pass ? 'He could only say "for
for this reason that, throughout theprotracted ciatirsv
himself that.he,never had once harboured a single
of my judicial life, I have always held it a shay, to
doubt reipecting die lawful:marriages. of subjects of
state all the reasons;n
from first to last, owhieb my*
this cciiintry though abroad, while . such marriages
decisions were grounded'; and ',l now defy any man
were selemnized in the chapeli, Or even the houses of io. the country, who haseier once suggested a. douht
' our Ambassadors; nor had he once doubted that the.
to me, during an investigation of mowent,, that
marriages. of British Subjects while ibtoia, when ac-
would say I had not thanked him for that single
cording with the respective laws of those States in
doubt. And I will say this, my Lords, not pet-
which they resided, were valid in English law. What
sonally but officially, that it is not proper,.when men
he objected to, therefore, was, that the present Bill
hold important posts in the State, and it does not be-
declared doubts which
.never had existed, while it had
long to others, who know nothing of their situation,
not the merit of laying them. m to throw out imputations, not against a great Judge
The new Bill, for rendering valid the British ar- (for Ido not pretend to call myself one), but against
riages in Russia, then passed through a Committee,
the administration of justice in a particular Court.--
and was reported without any amendments.
. Having said so much for myself, and here I must
LOrd HOLLAND gave notice of his intention to hi- entreat the indulgence of your Lordships, I now, come
trod:ice a specific Bill (the Noble Baron did not say more immediately to 'the question : and here I must
when) to render more valid the marriages of subjects say, distinctly, that although I should not remain
' when solemnized in foreign parts. one hour longer in office, yet, if your Lordships
APPELLATE JURISDICTION. • think my opinion of any weight, I shall feel h;und
The Earl of 'LIVERPOOL moved the second to assist your Lordships in conducting the judicial
• reading of the Bill for appointing a Commission far business of this House.. But, my Lords, unless some re-
Inquiry into the Judicature of Scotland, with especial form is made in the proceedings oldie Court of Session,
reference to the Court of Session in the matter of nothing will be done.. It so happens that the people
' Appeals from the same. of England have, I know not.how, a system of ju-
-1 The above Bill was immediately read a second risprudence not.ettualled in any country ; but, my
' time, and ordered to be cemnaitted for to-inorreiv. Lord‘thereisi wik cliffeifnce in the two countries.
: . The Earl of LIVERPOO 1, not mowed the initia- England has a.Coutt Of Equity and a. Court of Law,
' tory Resolution proposed:to the LOW Committee, to and one Cciurt so informs . the other as to prevent',
1 whom was referred so much of Report made to those anomalies which we find in the jurisprudence
' this House on the 17th of Jane, as relates to the at- at Scodand. I remember, with gratitude, the ad-
I tendance of Noble Lords; and the means of enforcing vice given me, when very young, by the late Justice
1 the tame. - Gould. He said to me—" Scott, you're a young man.
. The Earl GROSVENOR objected to the corn- you are a mere Tyro at the Bar. Do you aspire to
1 pulsatory attendance that was about to be inflicted; practice in a Court of Equity? If you do, I advise
I but, on.the • other band, he had no objection to the you to make yourself master of the law first, and,
' appoiatmeat of a Commiksinn of Inquiry. When it with a good stock of law, you may proceed to a Court
was required to be present five days during each of Equity." Here his Lordship commented on the
' week, instead of three days, the requisition. must be a proceedings of the Court of Session, whose forms he
matter of great inconvenience at the commencement censured, and observed, that half the Appeals brought'
of a 'Session. Was it ascertained; or certain, that before that House were on account of the Judges of
three Lords, withopt a penalty, could be procured to the Court of Session not giving the reasons of their
attend five days, as they already did three days ? If judgment. If, my Lords, correspondent measures
that failed, time enough still remained to enforce the are not taken with respect to Scotland, all your mea-
penalty of gso, for non-attendance. • ' sures here will be ineffectual. It is evident,. that in
Earl MANVERSfollowed on the same side. Scotland the Jury Court do not understand the pro-
Lord ERSKINE thott.ght it improper that the /Pi cess of Trial by Jury, as your Lordships have seen
should hare passed to its second stage witheitt a in the case of Lord Fife; the institution is tea recent
word. What, in effect, was it bat precisely in tran- for them, and they do not understand the Working of
script of the 6th andlth pages of the Committee's it. Another remedy, my-Lords, I havebeen told, is to
Report ;_and . Which, if •folloWed u(, by the appOint- introduce a Court 'of Error in Scotland; but I un-
ment of proper persons iti-Corrimissioriers'of Inquiry, derstand that this is iniracticable, What then is to
would not leave their Lordships much longer in be done,? It seems thata delay in Appeals is attri-
trouble. If the Bill passed, 'their Lordships would buted to my doubts; yet I:hope I shall not suffer by
'derive great assistance from their communications comparison with any man who. has sat as my prede-
With the enlightenediudges of the Court olSessiOn• teasel-in the Court of Chancery, or in this House.—
who, 'if well attended to, Might suggest thclih am- Let .your Lordship's hde reflect on• the accumulation
' sures most likely to lessen • dt.e number, of Seititi(dt and length of Appeals in these latter years. Look
Appeals. But, again, what Must be dodo In the only to the Roxburgh, the Banbury, and Berke-
meantime? He would say—nothing; lettheir Lord- ley causes, Which had no parallel in 'duration, as
°ships go on as Well as they Valid- lle;fot eine, never Contrasted with for Mer times, and you will appre-
wouldconsent to th-e egthoefilling of the House;' and elate the situation of the individual who had• to de-
he saw no remedy but by impounding tlii.l.lcibleand tide them; When, -my Lords, I look at the. ai re:ar
Learned Lord tiptoe the.WOUliack,
.siod,trialchtg it in of causes, I hope thatsomething will speedily be done.
• that Noble Person a breach of priiilege to. be absent
*Ny,:gporal life, at I observed before, cannot last
from that House—yieer, heer).—As *to deputed re- ltif
• and my judicial life ought not to last long;
niedies, their Lorddifea
siit was certain, might proceed therefore, if any of your Lordships have any
to the appointment of aDe my Speakeiv; but could thing better to propose, let it be proposed amt. Whew
they secure, by such an arrangement, a deputy I 1 first appeared at the bar IWas employed in Scotch_
Hearer? Could they be certain of any one competent causes; when I became a Judge 'in, the Court of
.to 'the judicial prOdess of their House? fie believed Common Pleas, I attenaii to„scosch causes then; ,
that he kneW something of the lAttis of_ Zn.glind, but When I was out of office, and 1 believe even then that
he confessed to be as ignorant of the Ocutbah. Law as
.no man could accuse me of negligence, I attended the
a native of Mexico. At* his advanced stage of exist- Scotch appeals in this House. I have, therefore, given
ence; ItuVi'abave the age of seventy, he found he deep consideration to Scotch causes, and have the
could be of little gsetetheirlfordships in the hearing vanity to suppose that my opinion may have some
of Scotch Appeals, as his early practice at the . Bar weight. But, my Lords, with respect wilt* arrear
: *lien from the Scottish • of business' in this House, ere we never to her a
The 'LORD 'C,If gicgt.toß, though inaudible Lord 'Keeper. of the Great Seal again? The qUeition
in many sentences, tip 4e je general to•the following is, in fact, whether your Lordships can point out or
effect :—" My Lords, lam desirous not to appear too adopt a better plan than that proposed to - you ?
imminent:on this occasion, though after what has Anfather.qttestion.is, if will suffer the. lieges of ,
fallen from the Noble alid.LearnedLiardnearu" who Scotland to remain as they are? for if yeu.do this, it
states that his age must iecapacitate him'frons *tip&
.. is telling the peopieedlEngland and behind they u ill
ante in this *use, I canoot. keep
.entiOY in the haven() rensedyji tom.. tribiturd. • As it respetts the!
backlroend. Of this lam petiectlyinre• that if Court ef.Chaneery;* I wish' *eh! 'be unberstood ad
the. Noble and Learned Lard utoesid give his attend- 'speaking ofticinlly, but as an individual Peer Of`,Per-
ance more frequently in the House, you, my Lords, ' 'lament. ' I
And here my Lords, I can only say, that
must feel gratified by it, and the country would be . if, the Lord *Chancellor is to sit only three days in the
obliged to himior it. But, stir 140,1- ben been Court of Chancery, and be occupied the three
.alter;;
taunted with my habit of doubting, and 04. by one nee days' in this..ll(ouse in hearing appeals, it will.be
amongst your Lordships. I am charged with start- impoiSible for any man so' circumstanced to dic-
ing hesitation, and with creating difficulties; and charge his duty to that Court: If nothing better can
this at a periocrof life *hen fallibility may be suf-
'your
proposed than the measures recommended lay '
fered to operate so far, at lest, as to suggest the pro-
piety of reconsideration in tjuestions of moment aid luny fears 'as to the result. I Enos thete me persons
There tight. must soon be an end to my natural life; 'who are of opinion tharehe Offices of Lord Chancel- !
and I care not haw joOnAtt eifl'it. tt
P:..? to itqleselleialifor and Speaker of this House might be.divide.l;
:life;. for it will lie *great, .I hope a lasting cesnfoirt but I can 'safely say, at the close of a long official I
for me to.know, that I hate, by my .cionlitiugss beca,gle, that I never knew an individual of professional
'the meansof preserving to .. li the
property that other- • isience, let him -belong, to what party he might, ,
visewing4 ilingajli.h!tee been awarded to 11: 'My did not deprecate-the eeryidea of separating these
Lords; foss the twenty Years, With only *short eackik!,, vitt offices, as tenclinc,m, *bile combined, to keep i
tion,•duriag which I have presided in the Cciurt Where . to ether; iiientiv Of lAW. it has also been a slues.:
I have-the botom. to sit. I have only to fleshy,- that non how far it might be convenient to sepal-ate the'
you will please-to compare my conduct with 1-,..t 91* cases of lunatics, and thejurissliction Of Anti) kr 0 pscies il '
my predecessors in the same official trust ; fur I will . from the office of Lord Charicciltir. lam williiiB to!

411 ow, that in ordinary bankruptcies tte Vice.
lailor's Court has been a most useful iustitutio
I,tkaigh not in matters of appeal; but I never c:in
iopscnt to remove the custody of Ihrirrics from- 07
pibuiral where it is now placed. I hope, in muck',
ing, that I have said nothing to offend the feelinr
any Noble Lord, though rvuch has been said, i niwt
believe uointeatiacally, to-uratutd.mpavt.u.
sue is with your Lor:dships, and I. earnestly'.
you will be gmide4 by tlyy; discretion and tlntt equity
which are the best safeguards of the rights-44,15e-stib.
ject,ancitto proudest monuments of your
The -Earl OROSVENOR, in expl,
that he never meant to offend the
Noble and Learned Lord; but if, as .
doubts had arisen from his conscieni
could only say that he regarded it as
tunate circumstance for the country.

The Xprl of AI3ARDEEN, as a 1%,
Cpmmittee from 'whom The Report
I wished their Lordships to remark, tlt
lion of all the 'etas lay in the appeals
No person could admire more than hi
'rivalled learning, laborious exertions,
ledged intFgrity alb, Noble and Lea.
the Woolsack; but he could not agree
die conclusions draWn by that. Noble
Lord. Scotland had not yet come to
frwrnity which was contemplated ac ti
Union.- .It Was' then, however, the
celebrated LOrd bacon, VIA the Scott
in_thep_roceSt.of time, coMe under the.
Englisb law.
.Lord RLI,ENBORQUGH suggest(
was not the intention of their.Laroshii
this debate, they could not adjourn al
than thv present (eiAht Arm.
beard, lie confessed be wished-far.soMe
.ider the subject.
Lod LIVERPOOL, said, when
should art ive, he would have no objt.
journment, if there should be any Nobs
not having delivered his opinion, w
Lord MELVILLE thought it hig,
whatever their Lordships might do
dispose of the appeals now before tht
I denied that it was a new modelling of
Lion of that House to appoint anon
Speaker of that House in place of the
lor, and he wished Noble Lords who
sertion to reflect, that his 11Lije,ty ci
pleased, put the Great Seal in. commi
approved of.the clause to compel attei
Lordships; because he considered an
bar to be the undoubted right of the
land ; and although the articles of 1
mention that'right, he did not think
a better prosf of that-being understood
the Union than the constant pact'
from the Courts below, which hk,
existed. Some. Noble Lord's complaine•
skin of Scotch appeals in this House ur
that it was assimilating the Scotch
law; but this he denied ; and he ,
Noble Lord were to decide, except .0
pies of Scottish law, he would be guit
tion of duty. He was satisfied, that if
continued in future to decide as they
done, they would give satisfaction to'
tish nation..

Lord HOLLAND objected to this
cause it, first, imputed to the consti
House a defect which did not exist;
it cast upon their Lordships an imputi
gence which they did not deserve. Aft'
tation, he thought it a little too lard '
Lord on the Woolsack, after getting a
inouire,itn tax. give you a measure
to constitutional objections; I don't sa'
one, but can you give me a better?"
The LORD CHANCELLOR.—Thi
mistakes what I said: I did not say
constitutional. objections.
Lord HOLLAND.—Then I will leave
stitutional," and' say " to'objectionse' '
and Learned Lord's meaning is this.•'.
Committee of three,-and I now call upon
ships to say whether you can propose -
sure?" He would ask any Noble Lord
say, iflisCpo; lading loaded the tab
were canesl op, and on being charged
spoilt all the diihes, were to reply,"
dishes are well cooked; but can you
ter ?"--(Lawyhteo—Bat so said this Corn'
dished up tiiis measure; they said, "
have had the knife and the ladle, and
you this dish; pow, if you who have not,.
committee, .i0o)10,,e not handled the'
ladle, don't like it.,'Cwiiati Mstke a betterl-
Lora LIVERPOQL.,ant I am satisfied
9ff .tbat
Lord HOLLADTD.—Then would 004
it nasty. To the observation that the
name a Lord Keeper, he would reply
to the man who said that the America
X'tkit to complain, as there were many
England who were only 'virtually represented,
•shcw to America the shameful part Of
• , and you tell her to look up to it:
spy, you chew to the Scots the anomaly
stitution of this House, and you tell ther
they have to look. up ;o." His Lordshik.
in,6 of the appointthent *of a Lord ,Keeper
him of that .ne.plus Ora of folly, Justice
scribed by Shakspeare, and of whom
" They, by observing of him, became
and he, by conversing with them, became
'A11007114 s.ery ing-man ;" and if that persr
in' this Muse, every NohIC Lord, who •
appointment could say in another line .ef ti
poes--" Write me down an os." He laquit
sent to the appointment.of a Speaker, nitlecii
wrung from llirn by sheer necessity ;Am' if .11
k, should. rat 4r3i3ppiatpncjaiiip among thekilnri.
ships than to have one.appouttga OtrieWliefi: lie 91'7
jected to this measure becauscit wars ikonittentsriih
their Lordships' dignity,Aecause it cast. -L1144T
Lordships an imputation which they did not.snix4o
and beciuse it std to !fie frqtAli- aution, for dish
appelAanti higirce4fties of Justice, tun.ao.
SOicb *Ppelatiti We attr-JOK-tilar article.
TWP or. three No4le:Llindllin wing riacp:at euft,
ThelEal,l of LOTERNOJesuggested thoptone4:l/.
°-1,3n abii*l9loo,4 Aubate4ltl to-storm
was

▪ the
aseful institutior,
; but I never C4ll
imarics from- the
hope, in conclud.
old the feelings cf
heen said, I court
ernestlj- I),Pe-414
In and thit equity-
rights-of-Orb-sub:
your own honour."
!Aplanation, —said;
e feelings of 4hi
IS it appeared, his
scientiousness, he
as a most unfor;
r•
Member of t' t?
rt was presentech
that the fotinda:
ds froin Scotloot.;
himself the uts:
▪ and acknow
Learned Lord rri'.
gree in Many-of
.ble and-Learned
to that-legal nni.
the period el-the
e opinion of AI
cotch -PAW :would,
; the yoke of
esto„ that .as
eips to contin
At abetter hn
error what he h
tome time to con.
a proper hot,
bjcction to an a.
Noble-Lord, wl
uld wish togivei
uglily necessary
do ultimately, tir•
the House.
of the comfit
nother person a !I'
he Lord Chancel
ho made that a
could, when I
mission. He al.:.
ttendance of thei
in appeal to th
to people of Sco
Union did . I
nk there could .- I
:ood at the time '
actice of appeal
had ever since
ained of the cleci-
upon the grou
hto the English '
e thought if any
.upon the printi.
uilty of a derelic-
if their Lordship
hey had hitherto -3
to the whole Scot- •1
is Resolution ; be.
istitution of that
:; and, secondly,
utrtion of negli-
After this intim-
trd for the Noble
a Committee to
ire which is liable
say it is a good ;
The Noble Baron
y it .was liable to
leave out as con.
e* but the Noble
▪ have had s
upon your Lord-
ose a better mea-
-d what he ultoq
Able wide dArie
ged with having
sion'(l4:l4
a cook Them. lick
I Committee wh,
U we certainly
id*.hitve gjven
notbeen On the
the knife and
betters"- 4
satisfied p dine
not, if I th4ogltt
the Crown could
ply 4; Aar ke dill.
nericans hnei. nD '
many present in
presented, "XCe9
Of our .094rit3th
it:" so be wapiti
,maly in the ctn.
them that's•Wirar
hip, when Speak.
eeper, retßittded
'tic; Sliell#N,.4i;"
Ins it
rte silly.dossiguri
came a very ftii#
person were no* ;
10 Voted for'ohs
in; :Of ,the yinir
**gull nut .010-•
r, in.:Wqo
-..butlf he situp
nohjt thetir to*

hit
Ity
11-b-

Lid;
the
his
he

i
;ect‘
da.•

u;.;

7W~

A.le

ad
on.

crir
e it.

'try,
, to
He

CCI•
:as.

und

;li.dt

...IL -

hir.s
or t)

co:-

IMOD
le to

iini y

‘•e It
I tiie
dot

dine

, <lv-
icgi
r the

‘OO-
-
twc:
Qt C•

e ol•

with
wkr
ttllsl
ist4o

ICS,

HOUSE OF .001EsIONS.
711 r, presented a Petition feint certain Inhabitants
of the Car.' Jr of St. Pauerate pealing for Itadicalileform.—Or-
a•el4. to Et anon the table. 1
own; pit IPPB-p -ajletition frostt the Shines •
of • • aceig::
Scar against the'iteelpriscity of Duties '
to he Print'd'
yds. CURTEIS presented a Petition from the Inhabitants of
peosel Hempstead against the Importation of Leekorn Strew
ilats..-Tberetitien was ordered to be printed.
CURT EIS then gave notice that he should, earl, 'suet
•' hatroduce a Bill. to•alter the present Law relating? to the
Dialog of 1109-baSs•
d,
wn
M. BARING presented & Petition ham Edward Tosen
comphining of the •operatien of the inditieg Limikeopt Laws: i•
Mr. JOHN SMITH supported the-Petition, which saes or-
derod to be printed.
Mr. STUART WOItTLEY presented a- Petitien -from the
stip-owners of Whitby, in the County of York, against the-Re-
Derry of Duties NM—tit-tiered to be printed.
The same Honourable Member presented a Petition-frotu the
Drachers and Linen Manufacturers of Barnsley, in the County
cf york, gait the imposition of a Dety on Yatn; also a Pe-
idea from t!le Flax-dressers of Knamsborough, of a direct!), op-
pate nature, in favour of the Duty on the Importation of fo-
-7,4,2 yaro,—Those Petitions were ordered to be printed.
:dr. CHOKER preseuted an Account of the Pirate Vessels
,t,stroyed by his Majestr's cruizers.—Ordered to be laid upon
table and to he printed.
Rlr STU.'IItT 1V(lItT LEY mooed the Order of the Day
the further cot sid& ration of the Report of the Sale of Game.
lee, for the put pas: of inovieg its postponement to neat Seniors.
Ile expressed hims-lf skeirons that permission should Le given
,) every petacii to kill teime on his own ground.
Camel DAVIES disapproved of the Hal altogether.
After a few words from Lord Datatrusse and Sir Joao
soluar, the further consideration of the Report was postponed
to rids dsy three months.
• rgrun. :JOORE presented a Petition from the Rib-
bon irearte-st of Coventry, praying for the Repeal of the Spital-
has Acts.—Ordered to lie upon the table.
Mr. Serjesat ONSLOW gave notice that he would, early next
Session, introduce a Rill for the Repeal of the Usury Laws.
Mr. HOBHOUSE peesetted a Petition from the Inhabitants
of St. eau's, Westminster, fraying for the repeal of the As-
sessed Taxes. Since putting his -question to the Chancellor of
the Exchequer on a former night, relative to basement shop
windows, he had found, on inquiry, that three windows of a
shop, bell by one of his constituent', looking into an alley,
were charged.
'Die CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, it did
not sive '7 in what situation the windows Were, if they were
shop windows; but these erobabiy were not Atop windows, al-
though on the basement story.
Mr. W. SMITH presented a Petition from upwards of 6000
operative Mmufacturers of Norwich, in favour of the Cocuhl-
natien Act Repeal MIL
Mr. P. MOORE said, he was convinced, if the House sat a
month longer, he should have thousands of Petitions in favour
of this Bill; he also e-as convinced, that if it was passed, it
wonid cure all the evils of the country.. He felt that he could
not pass the Bill without the aid of the Right klonourable Gen-
tlcnian opposite. His Bill was now dead fur the present Session,
but though dead, still it should live--(A laugh).—lle would
never lose sight of it, but would persevere till be had effected
his object.—Petition received, and ordered to be printed.
Sir J. MACKINTOSH said, he had h question to put, -on
the subject of our Foreign Policy, and should have put it to-day,
but fur the absence of the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs,
and, in consequence of the absence of his Right Hon. Friend, he
should postpone his question till to-tuorrew.
PRIVATZ MADHOUSES.

Mr. HUMS said, he held in his hand a Petition
Tim a person named Milford, complaining of the
conduct adopted towardtpatients •in Private Lunatic
Asylims, and prayiq,iiiipiesogation„
HOBHOUSE wished to call the attention of
the Government to thickisbjeti, aad to suggest the
prouriety of-putting an end at once to these recep-
tacles. He would mention the name of an individual-
%Silo had large establishments-for lunatics, at Lloxtori.
and Bethnal-green, and had many hundreds of indi-•
viduals under his care. lie (14r..Hobhouselhad seen
several individuals who had been in those.taceptacles,
and they had stated to him various acts of cruelty
and oppression to which they had been :Objected.
Mr. BROUGHAM did not wishto oppose inquiry,
or to punish misconduct if. it could be proved I blit
he must, at the same time, in justice to the individual
who had been alluded to,. say thut he had- alway.s
maintained the highest character, andebereece he
had seen that individual culled in aucrfxamieed in a
Court. *bete he (gr. Brougham) practises, his de-
meanour had always been such as did him honour ;
and where cities of lunacy occurred, and Mr. War.,
burton .was.not called in, his absence was generally
a subject of comment on oneside or otber,as leasing
the CtseinComplete. It ought to be recolletted, that
the, testimony of such individuals as those named by ,
the hitaiber-.for .Westminster, ought to be received
withthe greatest caution. A man might be.srlaciencir
recovered to be discharged from a madhouse, and yet;
might retain a feeling towards those tindei whose care
he bad been during his malady, strongly impregnated
.with prejudice and 1.110141C0.

Mr. PEEL was convinced these reported abuses
were gross exaggeration:land that to do away private
madhouses would be to open a door to abuses.
Mr. BENNET wicked for inquiry.
Mr. WYNN was convinced that there were greater
abuses in hospitals than in these madhouses ;
that to do.them away would be a public disadvantage.

Mr. FIUKE wished to remind the Member for
Winchelsea, that this Petition complained of no indi-
vidual by name.

Mr. BROUGHAM was aware of this. He knew
the Petition asked for inquiry—he was not against it.
What he desired was, that inquiry should take place,.
and that.modes of ascertaining what were, and what
wev opt, private madhouses, should be made stronger
than that which which 41t present existed. He was
perstfaded that it was desirable to have these estao-
- on a large scale, as, by that means, thee
was a greater probability of having -respectable indi-
viduals at their.head.--Tht Petition was then trzei vet/.

F

SCOTCIII JURIES.
Mr. KENNEDY moved the order of the day for-
the thhd reading of the Scotch Juries' Bill.
Lord 11.1.NN,IttiCi.opposed die motion. The got se'
had, by agreeing to the motion fors secomiseadirsg,
allowed-that some alteration ought to be made in the
system of striking Juries in iScotland, but it had nqt"
rieagfcl itself to the plan proposed by the finn.l4llecq;
Octr, tbist ciwAsing the J uric by .l 1. tie liable •
Lard went cuter .the different grounds h 4 olojeotbils'
to ltte 111, fie irtn.plored tbe Mouse mat-to wooden
tbepropo.sed innovation- 'Me Bill contained such a)
/mut prauciple that it .opghtto b,e.resitsted. 4e de-,
sal Uralic opposed gll improvement ire the
nal Law ol< Scotland, but the ifinovation ;contained in.
measure he could new' sanction.

fir. Q Bcßeft'Ot4flY observed, the objections nil
uts Lc ril Were of sucll a nature, that they TV
tiniisd, in his opinion, to have laiga stateo *lose a
Committee ; -and since he had km that its
pass, he sOuld not now tophe ad-moose awn

:dente, and attribute to the measure a particular'
ashinh he had tbenio Opp ortualifetaa
- Am:Secret ar y:PEEL 21214, :that :110. !VP.
the• House would not yield to the awments just
aged.by the_lifon. and Mamed Gentleman. The
How wonld n;ier, be wconvideed,iciOn a Mere
petit technical: objection; pass a -13 ill• -wiiich they
were convinced.was• 4 bad one. 'He rtially..ancliatin-
cerely-thought that the Bill wits a.bad one ;and. that,
if it were passed, the Honourable. and Learned Gen-
tleman would himself •tre the -first who would
,wish to see it repealed; or at least amended. These
were cpnseq nenc es sufficientl y pernicious which would
result from taking the -Jurors in an alphabetical.list.-
The first list, for instance, would inevitably containall"
AbercrombYs--(A laugh).—.He -recommended the
Honourable-and Learned. Gentleman, for the sake of
his Own character, to give further • ccisideration to
the measure (even if he was sure of a majority) before
he pressed the third reading.
Sir J. MACKINTOSH said; that he was most un-
feignedly surprised to find the Right Non. Cventle
man, after admitting the necessity of the Bill upon
principle, conic forward and oppose it at this stage,
upon the chance of a possible inconvenience, as the
Right Hon. Gentleman had said he.wisiied this,ques.;.
tion not to be looked upon as a mere question of
party politics,: be was confident the Committee had
not the benefit of his understanding and authority.
11r. Secretary C4lOO/40 said, that he believed
the Hon. and Learned Gentleman.had miitalten his
Right Hon,_Triend. If -the impression on his mind
:was Correct. fits IRigbt Hon. Friend agreed in the lie:
cessity of removing a particular kind of selection:
-But upon this the Hon. and Learnea 'Gentleman took'
another step, and assumed that he hadeondemned
all selection. It appeared to him, that'his Right•flon.
:Friend had Only consented to part with the present
system, because it was -faulty in theory, yet unim-
peachable in practice; if something could be snbsti-
tined in its place with a tolerable certainty of being
successful in practice, at the same time that it was
'free from ally apparent theoretical imperfection. But
be perfectly well remembered, in the former debate,
that his Right Hon. Fiiend•ohjected most decidedly
to the principle of ballot, and voted against it upon
the second mailing.. It was, therefore, too much to
expect, when the Bill• came for the third reading with
'the ballot, that he should give it his support. To the
principle of ballot he (Mr. Secretary Canning) enter-
tained the same objection.
Mr. KENNEDY supported the Bill.
Mr. PEEL explained.
After a few observations from, Mr. Faunas in sup-
port of the Bill, the House divided. The numbers were,
For the third reading - - 60
Agaiiist it - 56
- —4

Majority

The Bill was then-read a third time and passed.
SCOTCH COMMISSARY COURTS.
Upun re-admission to the Gallery, the Lord 'All•
VOOATE was addressing the House upon the subject of.
the Scotch Commissaries
.Bill. The Learned Lord
stated the number of those Courts to be 5111, and en.;
teted into some details relative to the alterations re+
commended by the Commissioners of Inquiry. • When
the question was put, that the Bill be iced a third time,
Lord A. HAMILTIV observed, that the Learned
Lord bad, for the first-time, Ott 'the third reading,
given any informatitin ici the Hausecto the subject of
the Bill. Hebelieied the Bill would experience the'
same fate with another-Bill of the Learned -Ltird's;
at the close of the lastlession, which, after having
passed .that House; hsd, upon the motion of- it col-.
league :that
43e.,Learned I.erd, been thrown out by
the noitse of. Lords.' 'no. IsToble Lord then pro-
ceeded to:aigtie.it Mine length; against.;the provi-
sions of the ill, and state?," that' 134E/lad:l:teen
given for the Office of j'roCiitittor -FiCitle-ho nne-of
:hese Courts, though the ConiMistiorters tad ..qoes-
tioned its Laity, and had bbjeCted strongly to the
practice of ;Alin'
, cifficei *belonging to the Courts of
Justice.- He (I.ofd. A.-Hamilton) was-farourahle to
the obiect that the Bill professed, though: by no
means to the mode by which that object was -to be
effected. From 1808 to 18$S no remedy had been.
applied to the evils complained 40. Thee Bill went:
to delegate the authority of the. House to certain:
,persons in Scotland ; a prinCiple.:*:bith, he trusted,
that House would net sanction, by its vote. 'The
Court-of Session was to appoint five .Sheriffs De,
puce, and those Sheriffs were to draw up a table.o4
-fees for their.owuCciurts. Why were not such f .
P,.stated in the Bill, that it might be seen whether thel
recommendation of the Commissioners had been coin 4,
plied with ? The Bill gave the Court .of Session a
power to legislate 'in
.all time co.ning by Acts of
Sederaut, than which nothing could be more odioel
.to the people of Scotland. Re:vos.inctined to think
the Bill would come to a premature death, from the
circdmstance that there probablrwould not I.! astir.
ficient number ot-Members to decide-upon the Bill 4
as it seemed likely—(tursoi/140fie-13/stsil)." that the
House will be left to.you,-bir, and myself." The.vote
he should give would be, that the .Bill.be not read ar
third time, as it was an impooper Sill to-pass.
Mr. K. DOUGLAS stated;.That the revenue mat
I defrauded to a great extent-feast-the ineifisiencraixl
' extent of the Commissariat Courts. For fiscal regu-
lations these courts were almost wholly inoperative-.
He was in favour of the Bill of the Learried:Lood.
• Mr. K ENNEDT-thought that part of the Bill most
objectionable that went to delegate such extensive
powers, so the Court of Session. He would /*com-
mend that-the Bill be withdrawn for the -roast.
The-LORD ADOOCATEreplied.
Mr. .A•BERCKOM-BY was of opinion, -that the
-Sheriff-Courts stiod equally in roped of peoision as ;the
Commissariat. He trusted the Learoed Loodwoultl
.not press the Bill in-the presentiSession.—lle iicinse_
divided--For the third reeding, 46—Against a, sl.
The Sheriffs`.Coorts Bill, after ales, soordsifrorts
the Loa AII)VOCATS and Loin A.III,4HOSIXOR, was-
ordered to be read a third time-that day-these months.
,- tortrr4amottli.
"The Distilleries Blil:ii:esilicor
The tti4tecitileint_tif the kat..—
~ , . . . _ ,
not thin it sterespry turnislt An iiiittne 1:1._
with a detail of its tbus4ef. All the .Amentirm...,
which he wished to llitro4uic were; framed in-coneertl
WWI the 1#1141.4s Witt totAte4o4 in the the ;frills and:
Scotch Voistilloriss; 4to4l9.balteil OW wo,ol4:o4Sirer
all the purposes imis*ed.to be peorbsced kopeiseiai
'Mr. C. iftrteliMON oadersiooccAbis 41011)1-
;Wets had itext objearqUS to flgreiV4e-4-4t101% s'
Eocise to lock up the room.

itted.

The CH ANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUE R would
.fig sus
• ‘4%
Mr. • ymirKs UN hoped there wkil,d Dello
ohjectiou to 'priding the new clanks. •
ThsetilliNctLEOit-of -the tijoitmetit aki
not.ece artyriitasna. for pritetiers the ci *uses, skit&
beo,itianied with;eonntainCtliettliistillers. ;,• •
Gentleman meant to withdraw the clause respect:.
ing the shutting up of the worm, which,'he'Untei'
stood, be-ruinous to the;Wrstillers. ~
tdr. WALLACE said, ell-thockausesi_vrerpt-that
respoctiog .tlars worm, were drawn up with.* coo-
sent. of the. distillers. •
Mr. HUME most strenuously recommended to Air:
Majesty's'Ministers, the absolute necessity of intro-
ducing more effective tweasureslor the, prevention of
smuggling. It was . idie to conceal: tiutcsmuggling
was at this moment carried on to an.itnrnertsee;teut
in _Englandr—Alienr). " Why, Sir," said the .Hon.
Member, .1 to such an extent is smuggling carried,
that every drop of spirits used in my ficuse
tuned through that channel(Leaudkrughing). You
may laugh, Geptlemen*but L assure yolk' that-wiaat I
s,tal,e is perfectly true, and it would be idle.to dog itj
(goatinne4kjrgbter). furthpr, noxiCinly are the
spirits which I use smuggled, but my poiket hang
kerchiefs (fakinz an East •India- silk -handkerchief
from Isis pocket), are also obtained in the same way:
(Continued laughter)--and I *RI •venture W, *ad!.
that if each Hon. Member pLesentwi)l produce his
hatulke.tclkief, he will chew birnielr equally culpable
. with -myself;—(LotidiaurAter). Gentlemen, yOu' rhay
laugh a s you Will; but it ni impossible-to-Conceal the
fact. ...tt hese I feel it necessary to im *re :
jesty's Ministers that they will devise romne efficient
remedy . for this crying and wide spreading evil—
(Laughing). For 140 most firmly maintain, that
when once a man lends himself, in the sligh test degree,
to the habit of smuggling, he becomes from-that mo-
ment not only exposed but strougly tompted
_to the
commission of the grossest an'd most flagrant crimes
(Loud and costumed laughtei). If the Chancellor
of the Exchequer does not make any proposition to
that effect, I will introduce a clause to permit a free
intercourse of spirits between Enghind and Scotland."

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said,
after the alarming declaration of the Honourable
Member as to the dreadful consequences of smug.
gling, and his confession that he himself was a smn,;-
gler, he felt alarmed as to his fate—(Alaugh).—As to
the production of hisforeign handkerchief, the Ho-
nourable Member ran a little danger, as, according
to the law as it stood, any one of his Hon. Friends
would be justified in taking it, and putting it in his
own pocket. The Hon. Member, therefore, bad
shewn an incautious degree of confidence in the ho-
nour of his neighbours—(A laugh).—As to the prin-
ciple, lie (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) agreed
with the Honourable Gentleman, and saw no reason
for permanently continuing the exclusion of Indian
handkerchiefs, and he would dare say the time would
come when they-should sec all this to rights. As to
the spirit intercourse, the subject was so difficult, and
it had presented itself so late in the Session, that he'
had been unable to construct a measure which he
could confidently recommend; and the Honourable
Member would be aware, that a measure not *ell
digested Would be unjust to all parties, and danger-
ous to the immense revenue concerned. In the next
Session he hoped to be able to propose a measure.
The Bill for a spirit intercourse between Scotland and
Ireland was introduced as a measure of necessity.
• Mr. HUME, after this candid explanation, said he
should not propose the.clause he had mentioned, in
the confidence that in the next Session something
would be done.
• Sir R. FERGUSON suggested that a short time
should •be allowed before the spirit intercourse of Ire-
land and Scotland took effect, as the Scots Distiller
had no stock of spirits on hand, while the Iri.sh Dis-
tiller, who had the Firivilege.of bending spirits, had
a large stock.
Mr. WALL,AcE said, the Irish Distiller was quite
as much afraid of •tlioScots as the Scots of the Irish.

liir.W.SMlTklsaid,tbe7Ppirit,Lawshad occasioned!
a -4011Staat struggle between the Scotch and Irish
Distillers and she Revenue, which bad been produc4
Live of a. constant system of fraud. -All that was now
desired was, to put the Distillers in the three coun=
tries 14)40 -the. wile footing, as the English Distillate
were willing to take their chance against the advan
tages pf the other two.
.Sir .R. FERGUSON said, the Scotch Distillers'
were willing to the shutting up of the warm, if it was
. not found to deteriorate the spirit.
Mr. O. BENNAT thought the people had as good
a right to drink spirit!, if they pleased, as any
Member had to drink wine.
Mr. HUME claimed for *Wand the same piivi-
lege of exporting her spirits to England. at Ireland had.
The chums were then agreed to, and the Bill was
ordered to.he reported to-morrow.

aßtrtsrl ROMAN CATHOLICS.
Mr.:6olll.lii/EN moved the third leading of the
Irish Insurrection Bill. . .
Lord NUG-FiblT. hoped the Eight Hon. Gentleman
would give.,precedence to the Bills which he had
brought forward for the relief of the British Roman
Catholics, which bad been postponed so frequently.
Mr.tiOULBURN Said, the yer,y delay in passing
this Bill bad been productive of much evil in the pre,
sent state of Irelitid.
The Elective Franchise Bill was recommitted:* .
BANKES objected to efing any more -poli-
tical power to persims professing- the Catholic 'relit
gion. . He contended, that after the passing of th*
Act they Could.not avoid giving the Catholics seats
ill Parliament, as well as,t9 open all offices to ;bent
He had no hesitation in giving the Bill his most de-
cided negative.
Istr.ll.-CAlRNEY.supposted the Bill. He.had no
apprehension of any additional power which this Bill'
would throw into the !triads of the Catholics.
x-,AT.,p 15,c4a, supported .this Bill ; bat de-
• •
clared_he would not go ode step further.
M. JOHN SMITH also supported the 13irL
mole respectable body than the. fitiglisli Catholic;
pert latllT.Oßigtd.
*ir• Sfr-retarY -44 46%1u *the coucession new
afiltqd for Ilms Anglish Catholics might safely be ado
milted. The present question divided itself 'lobs two
parts. The first, whether The tooeessiae could be
s tis*a Joie 6aGot; to xis! veligiess thy L&w ses§ablisjeed
and next, whether it s.esObelpross leiiir.solity. to the'


.:.

State ? He thought

*nd therefore he

not cousi
. .

a--r
•~~►~~~~ feu-.

General GA Sisb(slityfe. findo**mi.
Catholic came has lost_su. able an advocate; for no
one could fail to see, - that ,t)r the:yeast the Right
could
Aejt aisow. adow.ttreiots ilpysallipi
as. • edginHeg
liosiurik4mg feug )ash asessuerea
bcould see no necessity for the ignenelve:“the Catholics
ad not asked .
tlt,ie* n single
on ibe sdbiett .
.
• ari:LUSl4DierKiblistsaported the MTh 'He five:
sidczed all disabilities on the greartd eif-religiepe oqi
mirins-assnitinit` and iMpolitic, Ail:
increase the Aturibir.of,sectariaeionst**strerigthen
the,Esta,lished.Rllisien. • •
'Lerd,l3fliglNG stipportedibt*l.: . • •
GOOCII cornmdered, tile restri,stiens as naces!;
sary, inasmuch as
.the still. continued what
' they were, and would, aa was their duty, ulway,s.he,
anziously,3liae to. 'Daige cisFertssVharever they-cq old
Mr. BAbliellS, .joani“.saitioshat by supporting the
IBM they were dropping-the-key-stone into an imper-
fectare-(ldeav).-rIEW Hon. Me/Tiber strongly stsp-
ported. doe.metieu. • •
. Mr. Niira sigutify/pprted . •
gr. .41% gRELp. objectedto Alin Btllt as goidg.
itriiffectthefflintrarirerital article of theiThion bit:Veen
cottitiy 'See/land ; and, if adopted, mist.
lead to further: cancessioas;

~1

Mr. BUTTERWORTH:decIared, that .he etiald• •
not consent to the !Denture then before the'llonee..—
If Parhanse% sgrstured the boon -now. galled far, it
would be the trst step towards making still greater
concessions to the Catholics They would not rest
satisfied here, but would demand still greater privi-
leges—illear).—To prove the truth of this assertion,
he need only refer to the fact, that when the elective
franchise was extended to the Catholics uf Ireland
they soon began to claim more extensive privileges—
(Hear).—He could not agree that those rights ton.;
templated br the 13111 should be granted to'them, bew
cause he considered the principles of the Catholics
not to have undergone any change. The fears which
were formerly entertained of the Catholics were as
well founded now as they ever were. The samerin•
tolerant spirit still' prevailed amongst that sect—
(Hear).—So much were the intrigue' of particular
orders among them dreaded, that the Jesuits' had
been suppressed in every part of Europe. In the late
settlement of the kingdom of the Netherlands, the
Monarch wished to extend the privileges of the Pro-
testants; but the CathOlic Bishops complained asairist
the adoption of any-Such' metiure, as trentbingoi
the prerogatives attached to ;their religion. Has.wis
a sincere friend to religious:freedom, end . therefore
he opposed this Bill-7(year,,oad
Mr. H 4114 Lose to protes.tt j 4 the strongest manger?
agairist the siteciri of argument made use of by
Hon. Gentleman who had Pit- tat down. Ruch ob-
'Serrations were unfit for any man to make ; bat as
the lion. Gentleman was-himself a sectarian, and en-
joyed all the benefits of toleration, he was doubly
criminal in harbouring sentiments so intolerant. If
an individual connected with the Established Church
made use of language of that description, there
would be some excuse for him ; but when it was held
by a sectarian—by. oae whom the law, in a truly
tolerant spirit, protected; it was perfectly inexcusable
.(licar). _The
,Gentleman had expressed his
dread of %he. Jesuits ; but he would tell the House.
that there wag a class if o.lll:Otestant-Seicits"—(Hear,
heat), whO *ere much more tote feared--(Hear).—
'The-Church Establishment had much greater reason
to apprehend danger from the sect to which the Ho-
nourable Gentleman belonged than from the Catho-
lics—(clear). There was not a point that could be
favourable to their interest, or by which they thought
they could undermine the Established Church (not-
withstanding all their declarations of devotion to it),
that they did not, most assiduously, endeavour to gain
(Hear, hear). ',He looked upon the Methodists to be
the Jesuits, of all others, from whom the Church of
England had most to apprehenciHHear). • It was
quite clear to him, from tbe observationi made by
the Hon. Gentleman, thatit was impossible that he
could have .a particle of tolerant spirit in ibis breast
(Order!) The whole.9f his speech breathed nothing
but Perseetant. Ire again asserted, that the Govern-
ment ought io.loolc sitter the Methodists, instead of
the Catholics—(Hear, hear). B.c-the last fifty years
they had shewn themselves most •anxious to make
proselytes, and most assiduous in their hostility to re-
ligious liberty ; and he must say that he believed no
Roman Catholic' had ever expressed such intolerant
()Onions as the Hneourrible' entleman had uttered
dint night—(Near, hear). ••. .

Mr. BUTTERWORTH 'said, there was no neces-
sity for him to defend himself against the attack of the
Hon. Member. The sect to which he belonged was
highly complimented by the censure of a,gentls.4l:ln
who had defended Carl:lei principles in tIS Reuse.
Mr. HUME said, if the Hon. Meriiher attended to
facts, it-would be much better. He never had de-
fended .Mr. Carlile's principks.—The statement was
not true—(,Jar, hear)..
The CHAIRMAN hoped the 14031. Gentleraan
would not indulge in personal stbiervations.
Mr. H UM X:--Iftht Hon. Gentle nsan stands up and
asserts that which, is not true, I have a right to contra-
dict it. I assert that the Hon. Member as made :-.n
,tistack on my.pelsonal.conduct which is npt true.
, . I,9ed,HO.tiENT replied. 11,e3aiit; that the appte-
lierisions with respect to Jetpits. ieeie tilifouVideA,
;there were'
not now. three4esults'in fhe cobntry. '
• The gallery Watthen cleared fora-division.—For
the Bill 89 —Agai !Ist it .80--3•Maintity 59. :
On the Order of the Day fpr the third reading of
.the.lFish
Insurrection Act,
• Air. BENNET protested against the -Mil ; bat et that hotr
would: net detain the *wee by .string it knob iotp the aphisc!.
Colorer TRENCH defended thp 13411:
' *Mr. DR Si6fAtil Said, that the renewal of the Bilt`aasii prod
of its inefficacy. The Bid had been edit eprtistitelor
and, had increased the evils It %Tat PrPirt!e4.4? l!nlFdY.,
The Bill wad then read a third dint aria p3ased. •
f; ' The thiritefal Oaths BMlwas ricoasadated, ift3 the itevc:;
;o.l'o to be receixed:thil.447?
TtIZ XPIGAI
• The Cl-1.415. CELLO /1. of the EX.CIIWIIIt rnoleSls.3
the Annuity of 41460, treated •to the lateMtil Of .4. iiinseirtt,
by the kid) 4'.44i4P2k0.1. 093414 hfPPOß4VirtriPitir vii-
-s_ttpt,.. and 14e next success(); to tlif title: F test) ut it a
the illeiotot eirOcitsi lift 6e teovivettmaranswoc.
71" It 0014.4.ffifiZ,L14 PFIAPVI4i4EIiI44 RfO .the
' a: Thin a Cloth.

• , .I .

;

1