Star.
London, England, 1809-06-15 00:00:00

JUNE 13.

Mr. Beitaouotts moved for leave to file a criminal
information against a person of the name of Thomas.
Well, for insulting the Commissioners of the Income
Tax. This person against whom he moved, had
been surcharged by the Assessor of the Income Tax,
and had appealed to the Commissioners, who con-
firmed the surcharge, but mitigated it to 450. This
he refused to pay, and when summoned to say why
he would not pay, he declared he never would pay
more than the duty, and that he would not have his
pockets picked by a pack of scoundrels. The Learned
Counsel said, those gentlemen ought to be protected
in the execution of a very unthankful office.
The Court said, the expressions were words of an-
ger,.and not worthy the present mode of prosecution
—they had their remedy open by indictment.—Rule
refused.

Mr. GARNOW moved fora Rule to shew cause why
Bonniitg and-- Curwen 'should not pay to a
Mr. Cureton £9SI. being the sum which he had ad-
vanced them for carrying on-an action against a Mr.
Tunstall, but which they had not pro:•ecuted. He'
said Bowling was a pretended Attorney at Chatham,
procuring business for, Mr. Curwen, who was *At-
torney in town, aria lidding the matey Ifetilien
them. In this case there had been no bill delivereskra
Cureton by these partners, and by whom nothing was
done, although they had received this money as ror
costs. This motion would call upon -thou to bring
in their bill of costs, if any such they had• to make
tint.. Rule granted—But this being onlyan otiffrespik
statement, no judgment iCan rightly be formed on it
until-cause be shewn against they*.
JUNE IC—PORTUGUESE COUMISS/ONERS 11.'1111. LYN%
Mr. GARanw, who had on a former day obtained
a Rule to shew cause why a criminal information
dsould not be filed against Mr. Lyne fora supposed
libel, in having severely reprobated the conduct of the
parsons nominated agents for the care and manage-
pent of the unclaimed Portuguese property detained
is this country, stated that he wished his Rule might!
be discharged. Mr. Lyne having filed long afildit-
its in answer; and 'as he. felt he could not support
Rule, he was desirous of saving the. time of. the
Court, and the Rule was discharged accordingly,
?HZ taw v. VALENTINE JONES, EsQ,
The AiToariev-Gonnti.u. moved, he judgment of
Coutt 011-tAe.clefigOin.4)Wha. 4.4 *rt orpuyActed
of great peculation as Commissary in the Wes t In-'
dies, in the year 1796
Lord ELLMWBOROUGU reported. the whole of the
t: :a:, which took place before Aim at the last Sittings.

in Westminster-Han. It was an hAdtrilent, stating,
that the defendant was appOinted, in the year 1795,
Commissary-General to the King's forces in the Lee-
ward Islands, which was an office of great trust and
confidence, the duties of which consisted in providing
vessels for the carriage of his Majesty's troops, and
to provide them with stores and other necessaries, and
to perform all the, duties of the office of a Commis-
sary-General, for which a reasonable salary (X 5 a
day) was payable and paid to him, upon express con-
dition, that neither he., nor any person under him (all
of whom also had stated salaries), should, under any
pretence whatever, make any profit,. or derive any
emolument whatever, besides the said salary. That',
notwithstanding this engagement, he, the defendant,
did enter into a corrupt agreement to defraud the
King, and to make certain profits to himself in the
course of the execution of that office, and for that
purpose conspired with a person of the name of Hiir-
gins ; that be Higgins, was to supply the stores which
should be wanted tor the troops in the West Indies,
upon which Higgins was allowed to charge 30 per
Cent. profit, on condition that a moiety of such profit
should be allowed to the defendant ; which profit
(upon goods supplied to the amount of about one
million, in the course of ten months) amounted, to
the defendant's own share, to £153,273 currenoy,
being £87,179 sterling, that being a moiety of the
whole fraud upon Government ; the other moiety
being divided between Higgins and 'one Hugh Rose
(then Deputy-Paymaster there), who negotiated this
scheme between Higgins and the Defendant. 'rills
was the substance of the charge against the Defen-
dant, although the indictment stated it various ways
in different counts. The Defendant's commission,
dated sth October, 1795, was clear in its expression,
that he was on no account whatever, nor under any
pretence whatever, to make to himself any profit or
emolument whatever, beyond his £5 per day ; 21. of
which he received fronytho Lords of the Treasury,
and it 3 from the War-office. But to impress the
matter still more forcibly on the defendant, that he
must be content with his salary alone, a letter was
sent to him from the Right Honourable George Rose,
the Secretary to the Treasury, of which the follow-
ing is an extract—

`• It fs materialtobe distinctly understood by yon,andby every
person in your depai anent, that if any shall be found to have pro-
fired in tiny manner, directly or indirectly, other than by the
manner specified in the strict injunction•hereby communicated
to you, immediate dismission will be the consequence, without
the possibility of the party being employed again in any public
situation."

Notwithstanding which, the defendant had entered
into this corrupt bargain with Higgins, by which, in
the course of only ten months, the public had been
defrauded to the amount of 306,54.61. currency, being
164,3581. sterling; of which a moiety, being 153,273 L
currency, being 87,1791. sterling, went into the pocket
.of this defendant outof the public purse.
The facts being clear from the entries in the books
of Higgins, who supplied the goods, upon which 301
per cm. profit was charged for the purpose of di-
viding it—thus, a moiety to the defendant, and the
other-moiety between Higgins and Mr. Hugh Rose,
Deputy Paymaster, who negociated the bargain.—
There being no better answer to this case, than that
the defendant had a previously good character, the
Jury found him Guilty ; and now he came to receive
the judgment of the Court.
Mr. DALLAS addressed the Court for the defeistiant,
in mitigation of punishment ; several affidavits were
presented, made by physicians, whose opinion it was,
that such was the state of the. defendant's health, that
-a close damp place of residence, where there was not
free air, would endanger his life.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL made an able speech for
the Crown, calling for exemplary punishment, in this
case, as a debt due to public justice, and as to retri-
bution, in a civil sense, he saw no reason whatever
for sparing this defendant in making him refund what
he might have received, or compelling him to give,
up, whatever claim he might have to make upon (3o-
vernment. That principle. had been adopted in the
case of Alexamler Davison, gsq,-w.hich was .a slight
case in comparison with the present.
ClucarlosTicie,--..“ Let the clefendapt, be committed
to the .custody of the Marshal of this Court, and
brought%up to receive the judgment of the Court' on
-Monday next."
WEDGEWOOID. V. THE PRINCE STAIIREMBERG.
A Gentleman at the Bar, whose name we did not
learnt moved for leave to enter up judgment upon an
old warrant of attorney in this case. The defendant
was sworn to be alive on the sth of the present month,
being within the term.
CHIEF Jusriee—" You may enter up your judg-
:rnent, but you are aware, *at from:the situation of
the defendant, you can have no execution upon it, the
defendant being an Amlaassacor."
." Yes, I. am aware of that, my Lord."—M4 on
granted.
Another stood in a similar situation, and the Court
made the same order in it.

. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUNE e.. 1
SEIM:CTION.—.-BARNETT V. JACOB.
The plaintiir is a silversmith in the parish.of,St.,
IPaul, Shadwat, and the action was brought agaifitt,
the defendant, to recover damages for the eduction'
of his daughter, in consequence of which he had been
deprived of her services.
Mr. S.-2rjeani: SIIEPkiEFID stated the case, which was
detaiicd by the following evidence.
Miss Sarah Barnett, the plaintiff's daughter, (a
yo wng woman of interesting appearance) deposed that
the. defendant was an apprentice to her father. He,
was about twenty-two, and she was fourteen when he
first paid attention to her as a lower. She thought
his intention was-honourable, but in the end•she wail
'deceived. About three months b'efore Christmas,
1807, she consented to a criminal intimacy. The •
defendant promised ' her marriage at the time he ef-•
fected his purpose. : He left her father a short time
After her indiscretion, and•went to live in the neigh-
bourhood of Slradwell: IM May 1/.308; she was inti-
mate with him a seioratime, andinvved with child.
She then requested him to keep his promise of mar-
riage, supposing he was single,. but it appeared he
had been secretly. 'married to. another. Her father
supported -her cluiing the whole rime of her acceuche-
. On betthross-examination she stated that -the
defendant went to her bed-room where he first se-
\duced bet, while the servant, who slept in the samel
rooß4 was at work in the kitchen. Her father and
imother slept on the Boor underneath, and she called '
11901010,10 wit. The defendant at tin.- same i

0

time ecimpellect her to as—bilk to it4n, and told her'
that if she continued to make a noise, she would only
expose herself and him. sotwithstanding her screams
on the occasion, the fathily was not alarmed, anti her
connection with the defendant was not discovered until
she was with child. 'She repeated her intimacy with
ithe defendant about a fortnight before Whitsuntide
1808. She went to walk with her niece, a child of
two years old, in a rope-walk near the defendant's
garden at Shadwell, it was between eight and nine
in the evening. The defendant pulled her into his
garden, shut the, gate, and conducted her to a sum-
mer-house.

B. Solomon!, one of the plaintiff's rel Pions, de-
posed, that the defendant had said to him, when
Sarah Barnett was pregnant, " The child is mine,"
and Offered 501. if the witness would marry her, which
he refused, being a married' man.
A female, who had resided many years in the same
neighbourhood as the plaintiff, gave Mi's Barnett a
good'character for decent behaviour, previous to her
connection with the, d'efenda'nt. A surgeon also
proved the expence of the lying in.
Mr. Serjeant Bas-r, who did not call any witnesses
for the defendant, contended that the Jury could not
credit the improbable story told by the plaintiff's
daughter, and consequently that it was not a case
that required more than nominal damages.
After an excellent chayge.
one
~In.!;iEsMA'vs:.
FITI.D, the Jury deliberated gne.liottr,..aiiA
verdict for the Plaintiff`—bages.l4'lo.
JUNE 14--SQUIRE v. WOOD.
In this case, Mr. Serjeant LENS moved the Court
for a Rule to shew cause why the plaintiff slioald
not be at liberty to inspect the accounts of an el&emo-
synary corporation, instituted for the purpose of af-
fording relief to the poor of Norfolk and Suffolk.
The plaintiff had advanced money towards
_re-
plenishing the funds of the Corporation, and havinsK
brought an action to recover the same, he was non,
suited, from a deficiency of evidence to maintain his
suit, which evidence, it was afledged, was to be found
in the accounts of the Corporation. '
The Court was of opinion, that this application,
being unprecedented, the rule ought to he refused.
Sir JAMES MANSFIELD, however, recommended his
Learned Brother to examine the charter by which the
institution was incorporated, in order to find out if
there was not some clause authorizing such a iwoceed-
ing as that sought to be obtained bythe plaintiff.. At
the same time, he urged the necessity' of searching for
some precedents for such a stretch of the power of the
Court.—Rule refused. .

COCKPIT, WHITEHALL, JUNE 1. •
Before the Most Noble and Right Ikon. the Lords
Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes :
Ootton Planter, Gardner master.--This vessel, under
American colour, laden with beef, bound from Monte Video to
the Havannah, was captured by the Latona, and carried to An-
tigua, where the ship and cargo were eundenmeil. On the part
of the captors it was contended, that going to the Harannah was
in breach of his Majesty's instructions; on behalf of the. claimants
that it was not the original intention of the milers to go to the
Havannah ; but to proceed first to the Hand of St. Thonigs's, f, r
the purpose of inquiry whether she might proceed, and that, there-
fore, the destination must be cons...fiend as contingent. Sentence
of the Court below alErined.

Washington, Adams master.—This vessel, under Ameri-
can colours, laden with rum, brandy, &c. was eqtured on
the coast of Africa, by the Prince of Orange privaterr, and
carried to Surinam River. 'the Vice•Adneralty Court, at
Barbad?es, restored both ship and oarzo to the .clAinia its ; there
was also &reserved question of costs and. slerwor• against. the
captors, which the bulge rejected. From Huth. tbese.isentenc s
appeals were presented. Tlr.ir Lordships took tits*to consider
of their determination. ;

PARYAEWSIVPS DISSOLVED.
Bertinshaw, Whitehead',, fond. Co. hat-manufacturers, Ashton-
Lancashire,May 4, 1809.
Thomas SMlth and Thomas Ti!son, of the Chapter-house, Saint
Paul's Citurth-yard, Lomlon, solicitors, June 2, 1809.
The'wail and Clarke, Manchester, Jane 2, 1809.
John W. Rowe and Co. Castle Foundery, Bertnondsey-Wall,
Surrey, iran4ounders; Mc. 31, 1808.
John Dennis, junior, and Thomas Dennis, of Barnstaple, Devon,
limeburners; brae 3, 1809.
John Parkinson, Baxneel Southam, and James Smith, cotton qpirt..
ner, at.Furlow Factory, Salop, June 10, 1809.
Cowes' and Fasthopc, of Birmingham, jewellers and toy-makers,
Jule 10, 1809.
Nathaniel Dbgclatti andßrOthers, cotton-spinners, Castle-Clough,
Township of Haproni Lancashire, April 12, 1809.
Fleetwood and Ce. brewers, Sutton, Lancashire, May 11, 809.
Barnes aid Co. at the Colliery, Whistou, Lancashire, March 27.
R. Thompson and Co. No. 2; Circus, Minories, London, corn-
lightertnen, June 94;•1108.
John and Philip Rose, Broad-Mead, Bristol, printers and sta-
tioners, June 10, 1808. •
Joshua Gregory, Martin Wolstenbolm, Wm. Fishbourne, Samuel
Mappin, Richard Walker, and John Cott, of Sheffield, fender-
makers, as to John Oat, May 31, 1809.
John and James Swain, of Old Compton-street, Middlesex, ladies'
shoemakers, June IS, 1809.
R. Morris and James Busse, cleals in cattle, June 11, 1809.
John Gullet of Exeter, and Janio Nathaniel reloqitin Cosserat,
of Torquay, Devon, attornies at taw; -June 8, 1809.
DIVIDENDS.
Jane 27. Robert Soanes, of Mork-Jane, London, and of New-
Cross, Deptford, Kent, proiision-snerchain, and rope-maker,
at one, at Guildhall.
June 27. Wns. Althorn, of Tokenhouse-yard, London, broker,
at one, at Guildhall. . .
June 24. George Savory, of Southwark, Surrey, victualler, at
eleven, at Caddis-all.
July 4. Wm. Brown..a.Kitig-street, BlOotaslotrty, Ifftddre-set,

. .
troc.er, at tea, at Guildhall.
June 27. James Bullock, late of Scot's-yard, Bush-lane, Ceidon,
wine and spirit-merchant, of eleven, at Guildhall.
'June 29. Thomas • Salter, late of 'Trinity-square, Tower-UM,'
merchant and broker.,44 eleven, at Guildhall. • .• -
tune 29. Thomas Yeats; of I.ondon,: merchant, at elinnion
Guildhall.
June 29. Thomas Atkinson% of Erown s-qttay, , app ,
' In Mid-
dlesex, wharfinger, at eleven, at Guildhair" ' '.'" -•
Jdne 27. Wm. Henry Voiles, of: Dartmouth, Devon, splvitdetiller,
at eleven, at Guildhall, London.
June 20. John Leedharn, of•Kingston-upon-Hull, linen-drapEr
and drysaher, at eleven, at the George •
June 24. AUdrew kter and John Holding, of Wentworth-street,
Whitechapel, Middlesex, sugar-refineri,'at eleven* Guildnall.
June 27. Juba Page, of. Bishupsgate-street, I.oudou, haberaahvr,
at twelve, at Guildhaa..
July 16. William Wake, of Spital-square, London, silk-weaver,
clealcr and chaptnan, at ten, at Guildhall.
July 4. Joseph Ditulby, of-Liverpool, slater and plaibterer, at
eleven at the Glebe :tavern, Liverpool.
July 1. William Gloss! and I'vlattliew Close, of Leeds, Yorkshire,
dy;rs, at one, at Guildhall, London.
July 29. Joseph Piper and Knowles Winder, of Richmond, Sur-
rey, grocers and copartner*, at eleven, at Guildhall.
July 1. John Tyrrell, of Maictitone,l4nuiromen.uger, at one,
at Guildhall, Landon. '
June James Adams, of Frut&sireet, Cripplegate, London,
dealer in spiritlions liquors, it eleven, at Guildhall.
Jinn 16: Christopher Cole; of Ducitfirstleika, Devt.injeliruotast,
'at eleven, at the Lonsleirdin, latter'.
June 27. Jolut ,Christian Cooke and Thomas Christian Corker.,
of I.eadenhall-street, London, IMendrapers, and copal tilers, at
twelve, at Guildhall.
Jane 27. Wm. Easton- and Robert Easton, Jun. oftpu Alt-rah:my.
. London, warehousensen, at tea, at Guildhall. •

Wr77

~;

Mtn!.
Sunday last, at Evingttia, Kent, the Lay oi Joito one,
lay lion;ywood, Bart. of A daughter.

bT A R R 1-E-57

At St. Mary-le-Strand, John Dickens, Esti:to tits illstietii
Barrow.

On Sunday last, at Turner's Hill, in Hertfordshire, Mr. William
Walaye Macplta-son, a youth of amiable cLaracter, and proles-
sional merit 45 a geographer.
Lately, M:. Thos. Strickland, of Staple-Inn, Solicitor; aged t.:13.
Monday last, at Slleerness, Mr. Wm. Etty, of the Royal Navy,
aged 28. He was unfortunetely drowned whilst battling.
At Scringapamm, tit c l r,:th August last, Colonel Hugh Buchan:
of the Honourable East-India Company's Service.

Hi NVATEit Lop.4iYaN
Morning - 8 nli utey after 3
Afternoon ftnnLtei; after

BILIOUS AND NERVOUS liRAD-ACHnS, INDLGL'
'IION, atc.
Copy Of a Letter from R. Lucas, Est:. to Mr Dixon,Apothocary,
SlR—lii
c sequence ot several voyage; to the East
Indies, I had contracted a Pilious Cr-a:plain., in „jot
;,11
rlarniing event, as to be sczrcely able, at tart_;, to pay attentiow
to the duties of my ship. Throng!, the recommendation of a'
friend, I was led to make trial of your (DIXON'S) AN LIBILI:
OUS PILLS, by tl.c us:: of which, it's: a sbort time,l was, to my
as:inns:truant, iminttliateiy. relieved ; a:id have been ter a long
while, toniny free from any return of nattie.:, yellowness of the
skinotervous and s:cl-. g;thliness, and
other corresponding Symptoms. of thi abovz The
Stt2CtiS of your remedy hasi induced ma to i:coma:end it gene-
rally, and my brother in pzrticclar, third Officer of the Duke of
Mon:rose Indianian, who laboured under a worse affliction, If.
poisible, than myself, has hen in like manner completely cured.
' • I an:, Sir, your onedient humble serOatit,
ROBERT LUCAS, Chief Officer n r the lion.
Efst India Company's Ship, Uukn.
Gravoseng, June 24.
Sold wholesale and r-••ail at Mr. Butler's; No. 4, Cheapide,
corner of Paternost and retail by most Country ,Nlcdichle
Venders, in every '!'own, in boxes at Os. and 2s. 9d. each, aid
lanii;vl,nx•-s a !?s

lALYOtt IAN a DlaaCu VER 1

'r ['HE Advantage the Public must always derive
-11- from regislarly educated professional men directing almost
exclusively their studies to one species of malady, was ne-,er more
dearly demonstrated than by the unexampled success which has
attended the a.'ininistration of their new remedy, and the extraor-
dinary cures.it has performed. For a long series of years, Messrs.,
Coati t and CO. Surgeons, formerly in his-Majesty's service, have
made the Venereal lbstwe the particular object of their inveatii
gatiou, and are happy in haying discovered a medicine stipetior te
mercury in the cure of that complaint; it is sufficient to aserve
that the effects of this remedy are diametrically opposite to tbose
of mercury, for thottsh it completely eradicates every vestige of
the virus, in Its most co l:firmed staeo.., yet it does not in the kart
injure the censiittition ; en the contrary, it enovates the system
in all its natural t unctions, promotes appetite, and facilitates di-
gestion : thus instead of reducing a strong and vigorous constitu-
.tion to the frightful condition titat mercury does, it not only pre-
serves that constitution in its primitive state, hid restore.a weak
and. drbihtated one to its natural strentch and vigour. Number-
leis illeance3 are on recent record of tile superior efficacy of this
niedicire, its inherent and specific virtues acting as a perpetual
corrective to buddy clebiiity, Whether proceeding from an excess
of conjugal or illicit pleasure, or from the more insidious, thou&
not less destructive, indulgence Of incautious youth of both sesta,
in a certain pernicious hit:it.. Amidst the melancholy variety of
disorders which are the consequence of this solitary vice, there are
none mare afflicting .than that distressing state of debility and de-
ficiency which prevents or embitters the matrimonial state ; the
unhappy sufferer broods over his misfortune, ashamed to seek re.
lief, until he is reduced to such a state of weakness as to render
lire oppressive. To such persons it must be a consoling reflec-
tion to know, that they may now, by a
.new infallible mode of
treatmeet, be restored to that greatest of a!1 human bkssings,
strung, manly and vigorous constitution.

•
hi all cases of clebiltty4eficiency, from whatever cause arising,
as well as in every specie of venereal infection, Messrs. Currie
and Co. may be consulted by ratients of either sex with tht
^reams: secrecy, and honour, at their house, No. 107, Hatton
Garden. Patients in the country, describing the particelarikot
their complaints, by letter punt paid, tviclosing a 4ank
have the t•.ecessary medicine and advice seat to any put •
ktniclera. No. 147, Hu/one.ig*

WHEN PIZOFESSIONA.L MEN of Education
and Responsibility deyiate frqm the. GepetafSveteMo ttr
the selec:ion of a particular branch, tie sanction of loornontiouoi
ii.dcess is the best criterion of superiority.
Fourteen years have we devoted our practice to the enniftalvy
treatment of two disorders, and the successibl result of sue pion
givis us additi?nal ardour to oppose, as far as ire.ere alp e,. tie
ravages of those complaints which are the most itaaportant ip Lb,
catalogue of human infirmities.
After initiation into every branch of practice, we contemplated
the sufferings of Siphylitic and' Debilitated Pa• junto, and formed I
wish to rescue itulifti‘l*als font,the ignorance of uneducated omen,
er t•!.... equally dangerous precipitancy of general practitioners.
The disorders, to the cure of which we have devoted our atten-
tion, comprise every,species of Venereal Infection, whether of a
recent or long duration : all kinds of Debility, whether aris-
ing from the habits of school-boys, •r the indulgusicios of mature
age.—Nutnerous diseases are the result of ignorance, or haste in
the treatment of a simple Conarrlicra, and it not unireluently hap-
pens, that the seeds of life are poisoned by the indiscretion of an
unguarded boor.

Ey a superior method such complaints are easily eared] and
even where others have failed, we trust tliAr we tiny presunst to
tiff.n. a radical re-establishment.
Few, however, arc the CA ics of complicated distress in this dis-
order, compared with the calamitous situations of men, who.
from an indulgence in a Solitary Vite, or the prevalent gaieties of
a fashionable life, acquire that stases id debility, width* the un-
avoidable consequence of slick pernicious habits.
Where the unhappy .iufn-rer broods ever his misery, but care-
fully conceals his misfortune, it may be acme consolation for Into
to know, that akhough it be an object ot doubt or uncertainty
with other practitioners, the removal of these deficiencies by tho
1 gradual progress of renovation is the acquirement of nur experience.
if the rites of Bacchus or Venus have beeun to reduce zaiaaly
vis,otw, much Rimier v will he prevented by an ea l;
this languid state; and in those cases, no great difficulty will occur,
' But where this deficienry.has for years etisted, a proper pers,--
verance is indispensibly'requisita to revive the slumbering sp%ts
of life; and to re-apimite the constitution. •
The secrecy willed:Cis so essential to cur undertaking, and the
qualifications which'. we presume to state, form the basis of our
pretensiot:s, and the coincidence with such this intimation is Ole.
that Messrs. I.ricst and Co. nay be consulted personally, or by
letter, finclosing a Milk Nate) at their house, N0,,529, Arundel,
street, Strand, near 'rely:rile Ban—There Is an'addltional entranee
In Water-street adjoining, and the name is cn both Doors
,A Diploma from the Royal College of Surgoons in London,
and Testimonials fro-:: the mosteminent Physicians and Lecturers
of regular education, ird assiduous attention to the Studies ot
every branch of the prefessinn, are open to the inspec:ion of any
enquirer, and constitute a fair ground fur that success with v.bick
We have hitherto been honoured. E. LEIGH and Co. Surgeons;

TO THOSE WHOM IT MAY COAGERTqa
i`f is well known to many of those -whose feelings
are tortured by the sensation of -nervous irritability, which
przei:ces complaints little underi.t&od, and to which little reef
h afforded by general practitioners, that:such complaints Lave
originated from the destroetive practice of an.habitualindelrnco
at an age when passim; overpowers reason. The sufferers are
unwilling to disclose their former imprudence to who treat
n.-v..tus disorders with contempt, or even profess 41Leniselvps
not ant of the cure; and it is rot valilsont-pride and self.gratuta-
lion that Mr. Leigh, from his experience in this blanch, is ena-
bled to restore the juvenile, the riddle-agerf, and even the /Gino,
where the.complaints arise simply from tbis derangement of the
Nervous-System.—To those who by Paphian indulgence, rest-
' deuce warm climates, or intense study, have ,enereated the
mind, ditysipated the spirits, and reduced the vigour ot, the body.
Mr. Leigh offers that restoration to the enjoyment.of We !which
depends Oa a manly constitution.—The most•inscrstable stereo;
is observed.—Not fig, Arundel-street, Strand, near Temple bat.

LONDON Pr!nted and Publ:shecl.by I...EVEL !CENT, of Ca -
terhury Place, l.anbeth, at tie itrAg.-o.rizes so. 1. Cater
r-eet. publishscl also at the Stait-Oit tn. Tomer Bat: