Star.
London, England, 1825-11-25 00:00:00

NAVAL INTELLIGENCE.

Arrived off Dover, the Richmond, raarrass, front New York.
The Donna Maria,.--, from Dronthelm to Barcelooa, 4,44;
Ted on the 6th instant, inlat. 50. long. 11.

The Rhone, —, from Guadaloupe, Was lost on the 11th inst.
at the entrance of Nantes River.
The Magdalena, Boonuasina, from Bourdeaux to Hamburglt,
is lost near Brest.

FALMOUTH, Nov. 23.—Wind W. to W.S.W.—Arrised the
James, Camila, from St. John's ( N. 8.), in 31 days; experienced
a very heavy gale on the Ist of November, on the Ilink4 of Nrw.
foundland, which obliged her to throw part of her deck bud o•er.
board,'end lost her stern-boat. Sailed the_ Trusty, %Vnic, for
Alicant ; and the Waterloo, BLACKLER, for Lisbon.

PORTSMOUTH, Nov. vs.—Wind W.S. W.—Arrived the Sir IV,
&matey, SUITH, from Quebec, in 30 days; and the followivg oar.
ward bound vessels from the Downs, viz. St. Vincent', Maurer,
Volusia, Portland, Piggott. Garland Grove, and Temple, all for
Jamaica; Delaford, for St. Vincent's; Leander, for ditto, with
damage ; and the Smyrna packet, for Smyrna. Several more
working in from the eastward.

Cowes, Nov. 24.—Arrived the Lovely Ann, Bcsro, from Ilia
Grande; and Charlotte, Cmoaco, from Charleston.

DRAL, Nov. 24.—Wind S. X.—Arrived and sailed f. r the
River, the Moogley, Rana, from Batavia ; also, and remain, the
Cybele, liacetza, from Bay Cbaleur. The Vanilla. Daccuas,from
Jamaica, has put into Ramsgate, to repair her windlass. Anne('
from the River, and remain, the George, Barsocs, for TolLito,
St. David, SALMON, for Charleston ; Hampton, Namur., for tire.
nada ; Ce:rops, 611..m0ar, for Trinidad ; Montreal, Timm, he
Tobago; Arethusa, CLestaters, for Jamaica; and the Geagr,
Ilocowrou, for Bahia. Also, the Avon, Tirol's, from Shields to
Grenada; William and Henry, l'anvsmoi, from do. for Janniza.
Livharoot.,l Nov. 2.s.—Wind W.—Arrived the *flacons, Pit;
from Messina.
Care or GOOD 110 PR, Seer. 20.—Moet of the cargo and the
stores of the Mulgrave Utile will be saved, and that part which 14
not damaged sent home by the Victory, FERGUiON. The damaged
part will be sold.

CONSISTORY COURT-THIS DAY:

THOMAS SLIGHT ESQ. V. HELENA

chi, was a suit for a divorce, by reason of adultery.
hjr Ittaders may remember the nororiety given in the
.tv,tp.yets to the particulars of this Lady's elopement
'toil her husband, about two years back, in company
Tilney Long Wellesley Pole, which affair
yams the foundation of the present action.
Doctors JENNER and LUSHINOTON read a series of
efajoits proving the service of the citation upon Mrs.
B.,0„ and her having declared that she would not at.
teed the:eto, unless 111 r. Wellesley Pole should advise'
Ler s,,to dq. Under these circumstances, the Learned
conoiel prayed the Court to pronounce her in contempt.
se CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON inquired the nature of
.11/allegations in the suit ?
Dr. Lusumws.said, the adultery was laid at Naples
sad Fans, at the former of which places the Lady
from her husband, and as they Should allege,
b,j gone to reside with Mr. Wellesley Pole, and had
copped so to reside with him up to the present time.
urse of that period it was important the Court
,toultl know that the Lady had given birth to a child.
Aftef some further discussion, sentence of contempt was pro.
r, ICA as prayed.
..it EARL OF PORTSMOUTH, BY HIS COMMITTEE, v.
PANSoN, FALSELY CALLING HERSELF COUNTESS OF
r)STSSIOUTII .

'l4 Pr. ctor on behalf of Lord Portsmouth, prayed
re Admission of the libel in this case, as ordered on a
Court day.
Dr. JINNER sad, he appeared to oppose the libel, and
chichi he understood, WAS not to be brought in till the
lit Court day.
Dr. LIMHINGTON read the order of the Conic, fic:ng

L;s day for the admission, but said he had no ob;ec.ion
tc its standing over till the next Court day, it the pal ty
col.l consent to their having an issue granted during
t resent Term.
.r emulsion's's Itommsom said, that must rest with the parties.
1)r. .11301 SR had no instructions to accede to such
Tams. All be could say was, that the libel would
,t opposed.
Dt.LtsIIINGTON said, a great injustice would be
committed, if they did not obtain an issue during this
Trim. It was a care of the utliost unpin tame, and bad
peer. sent there by the L•ird Chancellor.
Dr. Jcsaart said, it uugbt to be remembered, that it
wai a very special and voluminous case, and inquired
to be carefully examined. As yet he had not had time
to p cruse the rapers.
Dr. Loaurrinvon said, they had been delivered
:rid!! fortnight.
Di. JENNE/I.—According to stri:t practice, they
ctla to have been delivered dime weeks ago.
Dann INGTON.—And, according to strict practice,
lb libel Guglit to have beers admitted on the last
teart•ciy! _ _

Sir C. -ROBINSON—I understood that, by agreenmit,
t:e case was to line stood over till next Meek.

Dr. Luumicrrom —1 *as no party to such arrange-
ment. The consequence will be, that we shall not be
4:e to ne witne►ses before next January.

Sr C. Rositssou-1 have not yet read the alkgations, and I
esld not think of deciding In a ease of so much motorm, upon
4e:4:mission of the vat iuus articles, without having time for mature
ciiltration. The case must stand over till the next Court-day.
lk. Lusuuorrusi— Well, Sir, I have done my duty, and am in
,wiy responsible for the delay.
it C. Ruaussou— And the Court has done its duty.

VICE.CLIANCELLOWS COURT, Novi:uses 24.
sreveas v. GUPPY.
!I this case a bill w as filed by the plaintiff, to compi
air 4!etendatit to make good the purchase of shares in
:dm mode at Costly, in Warwickshire, for the sum
,: 5,0001. according to agreement. The case had been
clewed to the Master to enquire whether a good title
ould be conveyed by the plaintiff? and it now came in
e shape of exceptions to the report. The Master
rung that th, plaintiff could not convey a clear title ;
:iitt, on the fact that the whole estate was burdened
ui:h a sum of 49,000/. and other debts and incum-
isance• ; and, secondly, that a will, by which a certain
Int . I the land was devised, was not in existence.—
lle plaintiff held, that his sale to the defendant was
1,47 fair three-sixteenths of the mines, and therefore that
lit Was not to be bound to clear off all the i: cum.
bronces when the liability was only partial ; and that,
with regard to the second point, the non-production of
the sill was quite immaterial, as the life-use of part of
the estate held under it had lately fallen in, and the de.
sift had not the sole and entire possession and title.
The VICE CHANCELLOR was of opinion that the Mat-
ter found correctly that the estate should be cleared of
all debt and incumbrance before the defendant was
compelled to complete the purchase. On the second
point, his Honour said, a title to a part of this propetty
is devised to Thomas Illickman, and it appeals by the
rolls of the Court that Thomas Hickman was admitted
their-at-law and devisee. Consequently, the Court is
°f itself evidence that there was a will. A perch rser,
therefore, is entitled to call for the production of that
sill, to see whether it did convey to Thomas Hickman
a good title. When he is called on for the will, he
ays ~ It is true there was a will—but at the time I was
elmitted 'tau this property, I carried that will to the
Steward of the Manor, who said it was not worth a
farthing, aid burnt it. I did not conceive that it was of
:clink value, fur it expressed an intention that my sis-
ter was to have part of the property, and I accordingly
'ether have one of the cottages for her life, but she is
no* dead." I am cle,rly of opinion, that unless that
sill be produced, or the contents of it proved, no pur.
ter can be called on to perform such a contract as
this, and therefore I must dismiss the bill.
ArroaNET-GENERAL U. PU4IIIIOIEI HALL, CANSKIDOI.
The Vics-Cumscat.Loo gave judgment in this care,
wherein an information had been filed by the Attorney.
General against the Governors of Pembroke Hall, Cam-
ridge, on behalf of the trustees of the St. Bee's Cbasity.
is 1605 the Archbishop of Catateo bury made a grant of
50/. a year for the following put poses: 201. a year to be
'Oiled for the support of one Fellow and two Scholats
ca Pembroke Hall; 251. a year towards the support of
the charity, and a further sum of 51. was directed to
be reserved till it amounted to 801. when it was to be ap-
, lopsided to the endowment of anci,her Scholarship at
l'ell'brebe Hall. The accumulation having reached 541.
• k 461414.1 out in the purchase of land, as it was found to be
ranee than adequate to the proposed endowment.
Ibent twenty-one years after that purchase, the trustees
of the Archbishop conveyed the land to the College for
Lterm Of 99 years, at the rent at which they themselves
.414 it, and the trustees at the same time made a similar
tear veya,oceto the St. Bee's Chao ity, of lands to the value
t
Li 301. a year. It is corstended that this was a fraudu-
lent cooveyiriCe,' is the lands must have necess ail)
intlproved in value in the course of 21 years, and have
'etc worth more than the original rent' but there was

nothing in the ease to justify the Court interta ring
such an opinion. The lands which had been conveyed
to the C.llege at 244 a-year had, in the course of time,
grown up to the yearly value of 5001. while those
leased to the charity produced only 1301. The object
of this application was to have the pixiduce of these
,lends thrown into a common fund, and that the Go-
vernor of the College should only be allowed to receive
from them such proportion of the produce as 241. ww.
to 541. 1 am, however, of opinion that the right of the
College cannot be disturbed, and that, as the original
conveyance had been fair and bonvide, the College WAS
entitled to the benefits arising from the arrear of the
valoe\of the property.
kOURT OF KING'S BENCH, Novaxsar..24.

CRIMINAL INFOHMATION

Mr. SCARLITT moved, on the behalf of Mr. Hirllett,
one of the firm of Hullett and Co. merchants, Thrug-
morton-street, for a c►iminal information against Mr.
Clement, the proprietor of the Morning Chronicle, for
a libel which appeared in that paper, in the shape of a
letter from a correspondent, commenting on an obser-
vation made by Mr. Canning, in the course of a dis-
cussion during the last Session of Parliament, in which
he stated the disinclination of our Government to receive
any commercial agent in the capacity of a public En-
voy, from any of the South American States. The
correspondent of the morning Ghronicle, in alluding to
this circumstance, says that Mr. Huliett was received
with a thundering refusal at Downing-street, which
would make it impossible for him ever again to make
his appearance there in a similar capacity. The cone-
spondent goes on lo ask whether the ruling powers in
South America had taken measures to remove this ob.
noxious Mini ter? for if they had not there would be
reason to suspect that they had also shared in the spoil:
of Throgmo: ton-street.
Mr. SCARLETT stated, from I:is affidavits, drat Hill-
krt and Co. had re-contracted a lira r of a million ster-

ling ft.r the Chilian Government, with th. ir agent
lisardi, which loan was secured by a mortgage on all
the Chilian States, and the bonds lo.iged in the Bank of
England ; and that the proceeds of this loan had been
entirely paid over to the Chilian Government, or s.rictly
applied according to their orders, and that no part of
it had been appropriated in the manlier insinuated in
the libel.
The Court granted the rule.