Star.
London, England, 1807-02-19 00:00:00

rofed from the Court of ettenOey: he mull gie his anfwers to the daughter was, in the cafe of the father having lott lee fey-
mediatcly upon their bring pie.), fed, fo that k was more cafe I vices from the violence committed. No fueh injury had hi e t (of-
thy. a rnittake might be commit ei, efpecially in matters of arida- tanned with refpeife to her, and therefore that part of the charge
metical computation involving long and intricate accounts. The i muff be laid entirely out of the cafe. There. however, was one
difpofition now manifelted by the Margravine for the relief of the , charge, to which no anfwer had been given, and that was, theft.
diftreffes of her fitter, had not always been equally adtive. The juries fultained by the wife, in ennfequence of which fhe was un
Learned Counfel would be able to produce letters to (hew that her i able to fulfil her ordinary denier as a teacher of mute, and thus
Highnefs was nut always freest, that the (poke with much aheititY i the Plaintiff was deprived of the benefit of her Cervices. This
of the Counters, and that ihe ennfitiered her I.adyfhip's veracity, on i would be a Cufficient foundation Cot a portion of the damages
lane necafions at !raft. extremely queftionable There were other fought in the prefent adtion. In this cafe the procefs againft the
letters which paired between there Noble Perfoeages which would I Plaintiff was legal, and it was the duty of the Bailiff to arreft
ief rve the attention of the Jury, as affedting the queßiori on the him ; hut here was no attempt at a refcue, and confequently no
confiftency of thee ladies, and the credit to be attached to their foftification of the violence offered. To the extent then of the loft
teftimony. It was peflihle that the Gentlemen lie addreffed were of ferviee in the wife, coupled with the circumftances of the dif
unacquainted with her Highnefs, under the dignified title fhe now 1 turbance given to domeftic peace, damages might be affigned ; and
received from her late connedlion with an Imperial Prince, but fhe I his Lordlhip had no doubt the Gentlemen of the Jury would, with
might he better known to them as lady Craven; if, however, the a due regard to the peace of femiies, arid with that moderate fpi •
Jury had no acquaintance with her in that chandler. he would tit to which the Plaintiff was entitled, cxercife their judgment on
rather with that they should attribute to her the extreme punctilio the cafe before them.—Verdidt soot.
of morality, than any deviations from it. Mrs. Mayew was attending in the avenues of the Court when
Mr. GAat ow I with to know, if my Learned Friend can this decifion was given. On being informed of it, the was corn-
produce any letter which authorizes theft remarks ?" plctely overpowered; the Hall refounded with her cries ; and, in
Lord ELLENBOROUGH (to Mr. Marryatt).—" I will give you the ntidft of hir paroxyfni,fhe was with much difficulty removed
an opportunity of making fuch ohfervatiotis, when the letter on from the neighbourhood of the Court
which they may be founded is difcovered : until then, it may be
more difcreet to fupprefs them"
Mr. MARRTAT concluded with obferving, that, taking the
whole of the evidence, there was not fufficient ground even to
charge Mr. Barnett, civilly, with the amount of 3001. much lefs
could he be found guilty of the heinous crime of perjury, on Rich
incomplete and unfatisfadtory evidence.
Witneffe: were then called on the part of the Defendant ; Mr.
Carr, Mr. Lackington, Mr. Forfter, Mr. Mall, and the Matter of
the Crown Office. Accounts were alfo produced, on which vp-
peared various fettlements between the Margravine, the Countefs,
and Mr Barnett, the latter of which brought down the Remittent
of particulars to the 3oth of December, 'Son, and in which 3001.
charged to have been paid to the Defendant, was not included, al-
though it contained items of a contemporary date.
This account drew Come ohfervations from the Learned Coon-
fel for the Defendant, which were replied to, with the other par-
ticulars, in the general argument by Mr. GAaaow; after which
I:is Lordihip commented on the law and fads of the cafe at conh-
derable length, directing the attention of the Jury to two points ;
heft, whether the Defendant adlually received the 3001. in quer-
tion ; and, next, whether having fo received it, he knowingly and
wilfully withheld his acknowledgment of loch payment, in anfwer
to the fecond interrogatory Rated in the indidtment ?
A fter a few minutes corfultation with each other, the Jury found
the Defendant Guilty.
TURNER AND ANOTHER (ASSIGNEES Or WESTMACOTT),.. THE

LxvDaN MARKETS.

CORN MARKET, MARK LANE, FEE. tB.—The fup-
plies of Wheat to-day are fhort, with fcarce any
further arrivals ; Fine is much in demand, and, if
here, would command better prices ; and other qua-
lities likewife maintain their prices—Barley is in
confiderahle quantities, and this trade is full as dear
—Malt and White Peas nearly at !all prices—there
are further fupplies of Tick Beans, which are a trifle
cheaper—Oats are in Aunt fupply, with few frefh
arrivals, and this article is rather dearer—and good
Flour fetches a better price—Fine American 465. to
sts. per barrel.
GENERAL CURRENCY AS UNDER 2
Wheat, sos 68. Ilzs per qr. Grey Peafe 441 48sod
Fine Ditto. llss 88s od Beans, (old) 42. 485 al
Rye, 444 481 od Tick Ditto (old) 335 396 od
8ar1ey.336 391 Oats, 235 26- so.
Malt, 643 ios Poland ditto 3t, 13' at
White Peafc, (Bonen) 806 flFs Rape Sred. 261 3cl Toe
Fine Floor 65s to 725. Second. 6cs to 656
PRICE uF HOPS IN THE BOILOUOII MARKET.
New Osg4 41 Tog to 51 156 I Pockets 51 os to 61 1011
fRICE Of DAY AND STRAW IN Sill ILIYIELD.
Hay, 105 to 41 1511 Clover 41 03 to 51
Rowen of os to of on S Straw, 21 os to 31 os

•
DEAN AND CHAPTER OF Heim-oleo
This was an action for a per tentage upon 44001. the amount
of certain works performed upon the Cathedral at Hereford. Mr.
Weßmacott was a flone.ntafon, and was employed by Mr. Wyatt,
the architedt, to fuperintend the works alluded to, and confidered
himfclf emitted to is per cent. for his hill and attention ; but it
appearing. in the progrtr, of the canfe, that the Dean and Chapter
bad confulted Mr. Wyatt upon a plan and ertimate, and that they
looked to him as the principal, the Judge ordered a nonfuit, upon
the ground that Mr. Weftmacott was employed by that gentle.
man, and not by the Dean and Chapter.
FEB. 18.-THE KING V. ROBERT CRAMMAND.
This was an indidtment, charging cruelty on the Defendant,
in his treatment of a boy at the fchool of Mr. Barnes, at Hack-
ney, (late Mr. Pickborne's) where this perfon was in the fitua-
tion of Ufher.
Mr. GARROW raid, that the Prorecutor for this feriou. offence,
was a Gentleman who held the rank of a General Officer in the '
United States ; his name was Lyman, and he was now Conful
for that Republic. '1 he General placed his fon at Mr. Barnes'
fehool, with this injunction to the mailer, that he fhnuld for no
offence, and under no circumftances whatever, diflidi on him
corporal puniihment. The boy was only thirteen years old when
he took the liberty of quizzing one of the Ufher,, Mr. Adams.
This tither reprefented to the Defendant the difrefpeet be had re-
ceived. on which Matter Lyman was fined fiapence• and ordered
to go down on his knees, and Elk pardon. Probably tome Incitation
was (hewn, and the Defendant kited a bamboo flick, and applied
it moil unmercifully on the back and 'boulders of the youth. All
matters concerned in education, where no reftrictions were ins-
pored by the parents or guardians, were juttifiri in applying
nind•rate ehaftifetnent for the maintenance of order, ar.d for the
purport of improvement; but in no cafe could they curdle excel-
' five reverity, without readering themfelves liable to the punilh-
i talent of the law.
Mager Lyman depored to his own improper condudt towards
the Englifh teacher, Mr Adams, and to the reverity with which
he had been treated by the Defendant, who, during the nines of
Mr Barnes, fuperintended the rehonl. The morning fubfequrnt
be flipped out of the Houk, and came to his father's in London.
General Lyman gave evidence to the reftriEtion with rrfpedt to
corporal pun4ment--on which his Lordfhip remarked, that he
differed widely in opinion from the witnets,confidering it very in-
jurious to fend a boy to reboot where he was not to fubmit to the
dircipline to which the companions of his ftudles were ex/solid.—
, The General proceeded to Rate the condition of his fon after his
' punifliment—there was a great eztravafation of Hood, and the
natural core pies ion had difappeared on his back, and the parts ad-
jacent ; in which he was confirmed by the furgeon, Mr Derby•
Sire.
Sir VICART Grass, foil the Defendant, raid, that no fuch ref-
trietion with refpect to corporal puniihment was ever impored—
that, if fuch a fuggeltion had been made by the General to Mr.
Barnes, the youth would not have been admitted into that femi-
nary. It was impollible that ally fuch indulgence could be given
to a. particular individual, without rendering the eftahlifliment
liable to general infubordination. The Learned Counfel was ex-
tremely Corry to lay, that the young gentleman had very much
niiitated the fads—he was much mole inclined to attribute it to
wait of memory than want of principle; indeed, it would be thock-
ing to Ripple. that at his tender period of life, the withers could
be indifferent to the folemn obligations of an oath.
Mr Pickhorne, Mr Barnes, Mr Adams, and ether witneffes,
depofed to the general good condudt and humanity of the Defen-
dant, who had been fixeen year Lat the reboot, tither in the Mu-
ation of a pupil or a teacher.
The Learned judge, in fumming up the cafe, reduced the ge-
neral fubjed to the fingle queftion, whether the punifhment in-
-1 flidted on the boy were of that moderate kind, fa nteeffary to the
purpofes of education, or whether it were exceffive, and inconfif-
i tent with the humane maxims of Britith law?---.1 he Jury found the
Defendant Guilty.

Among the diforders of health we clafs an habi-
tual coflivenefs; and obllruftions in the veffels con-
neiled with digellion, which, from the ufe of purga-
tives, are not relieved, but they become a conftitu-
tional complaint. Calomel, antibilious medicines,
and various formula have been employed, but they
certainly only difcharge the accumulated matter,
leaving the caufe exifting ; and every one, under
their operation, finds the neceffity of continuing, and
periodically increafing the dole, from the tone and
fenfitivenefs of the llomuh and inteftines being par.
tially deftroyed. The incceis of SHLSBURY'S Patent
Antifcorbutic Drops, in removing glandular obftruc-
tions, improving the appetite, and deftro) ing that
irritation canting head ache, fenfe of weight, nervous
affdtions, &c. gives full value to thefe antifcotbutics,
as when employed in Gout, Rheumatilm, Ulcera-
tions, or Scrophula.—Mr. SPILSBURY is not account-
able for any mixture fold, wags the words 6' By the
King's Patent" are inferted at length on the bill of
direaions, bottle, and wrapper; the (lamp alto (the
King's duty) is printed in black ink inflead of red wk.
—Sold at the Difpenfary, No. 15, Sidle) Square,
London, in bottles of ss. 6d. cos. and 11 2s. duty
included. Compound Effence Bs.

FOR VENEREAL AND SCORBUTIC COMPLAINTS.
DR. FREEMAN': GUl'ra SALUTARIS, is
by far the molt fare and effedual Remedy ever yet dirover-
ed for the Cure of that dangerous Difea(e. Perfons unhappily af-
Aided with Venereal Complaints in allies Rages, and under its va-
rious appearances, will find a Imre and prefent relief, by taking
thefe molt invaluable Drops : which, for their excellency during 3o
years pradice in the molt populous part of London, viz. Hatton-
Garden, have been termed Gutta Salutaris The fecrecy with
which molt perfons fo afllided find it needful to conceal theirfuffer-
ings, may be fairly employed whit: ufing thefe Drops; fince they
render confinement unneecffary, as well as all unduous or mercu-
rial preparations, or any furgical operation whatever.
By appointment of Dr Freeman, they are.fald wholefale and re-
tail, by R. Butler, No 4. Cheapfide, corner If Paternofter-row ;
Belim and Gibbs. Portfmouth ; Welton and Roberts, Portrea ;
Roberts, H arding. and Johnfon, Golport; Wills, Pittman, and Ro-
ger+, Plymouth ; Roche, Philph,Hoxland. Haydon, and Glenwlll,
Dock ; Dixon, Falmouth ; Neales and Mitchell, Dover ; Sharp
and Long, Deal; Coleman and Jacob, Sh •crncfs; Witberidge,
Chatham ; Warren, and Burgers and Ralph, Margate ; Thumpfon,
Yarmouth ; Peck, Hull ; Wolltenholme, York ; Macdonald,
Glafgow ; Browning, Paifley ; Baxter and Smith, Edinburgh;
Heaton, Leed• ; Wood, Wakefield ; Lathbury, Liverpool ; Stains
I and Vaughan, Manchefter; Williams and Truman, Fxeter ; Col-
lins, Salisbury ; Barry and Sheppard, Briftol ; Hazard and Hunt,
Bath ; Stevenfon, Norwich ; Hodfon, Cambrtdge ; Pollard.
Brighton; Land, Maidßone ; Burbagc, Nottingham; Drewry
Derby ; Wood, and Nott and Lloyd, Birmingham; and n,oft Me
dicine Venders, in bottles At 25.9 d. each, with ample dirediinlis.

RENOVATED HEALTH.
IT has been too frequently the fubje&t• of juft and
general reprobation. that men dettitute of the elements of
the medical art, have offered themfclvc.s as candidates for public
patronage in the profelfion of phyfic. For the purpofe of doing
juttice to the refult of our ftudies and experience. and to prevent
us from being claffed aniongehofe empirics whofe impudent pre-
tenfions have, unfortunately for (ochry, been too favourably re-
ceived, we beg leave to fubnait to the liberal and enlightened a
faithfuNtatement of our purfuits and acquirements. After having
received a regular medical education as the pupils of Meffrs. Grin-
dal and 'Maud, whofe lectoes and practice we carefully atten-
ded, as prof, ffors and furgeons of the London Hofpital. we entered
ourfelves as itudents in that juftly celebrated fehool for medical
acquirement. the Royal College of Edinburgh, and were iuftruc-
ted in the different branches of Anatomy, Surgery, the theory and
pradice of P'iyfic, Chemiftry, Midwifery. liotAtty, &c &c. by
thole eminent p-ofeffora, Drs. Moon.), Gregory. Black, Hamilton,
Duncan and Rutherford. We truft we !hall not be deemed pre-
fumptuous in laying that our proficiency and acquirements are not
ineoufiderable• Having for a I,.ng (cries of years made venereal
complaints. and the various dikafes of DEIRLITY, the particular
tabled of our itudies and pradice, it will, we hope, he a11.tw..4
that we have acquired fui•erior knowledge of their treatment
and cure. In flight anti recent cafes of infation, a perfed re
ettabliihment is completed I t the limn period of two day;; and,
in thore of the utmott inveteracy, where other praditiosit rs have
failed of funnels, a proper perfeverauce in our plan of treatment,
=Cures to the patient a lafe and radical cure.
Amidft the melancholy variety of diforders which arethe effo'ts
a a habit long and tuna unl.appily purfued by the youth of both
Sexes, there are none more alarming or more diftreffinr than thole
deficiencies and debilities which Irelluently prevent or embitter
the matrinsawal Rate. To fuc:‘ perfons it mull be a confoling re-
&talon to know that they may now, by a new sod infallible mode
of treatment, be reftored to that greatefk of all human bleffings, a
ftrong. manly, and vigorous conftitution. In all cafes of debility,
from whatever caufe arilitig, as well as in every fpecies of vane-
real infedion, we may be confialted by patients of either fax with
the grcateft fecrecy and honour. Hours of confultation at home
from ten to three, and from fix in the evening till ten at night.
Patients in the country ore requefted to Rate the particulars of
their cafe, age, and general habit of living, &c. &c. inclofi tg a
remittance for advice and medicines, when the (me will be given
or fent to any part of the kingdom. To allure that feerecy fo ef-
feudal to our undertaking, the portage of letters may be added to
the account for medicines. CURRIE and Co. Surgeons,
November z 6, 2866. No. tc7, HattouGarden.

MATtW a. HARZ.
This was an salon of trefpafs and battery, for injury done to
the plaintiff; and to the wife and daughter of the plaintiff.
The Plaintiff is a fchoolmafter at Hendon, and the Defendant
hatter in the Strand. The action was brought for an affault. It
appeared that Mrs. Mayew, affifttd by her hufband, kept a
boarding fcheol at Hendon, and that the daughter of the Defen-
dant had received her education in that feminary. Some time
fince Mifs Hare was fuddenly withdrawn from the fehool, and
was Coon followed by Madame Vernier, the French teacher.;
There two ladies fet up another Idled its oppofition to Mrs May-
hew. Before nadatne Vernier left the Plaintiff's, a large turn of
money was due to her for falary, and Hare, the Defendant. ad-
vifed an action. A writ was Cued out, and placed in the hands of
lA'ilfon, a Sheriff's Officer.
Mr. Gnat ROW raid, that on a cold morning, on the 30th of I
Odober laft. the defendant fet out in a Lujy, with Mr. Wain
the Sheriff's officer. and arrived at the home of Mr. Mayew be-
tween 9 and to o'clock. The Sheriff's officer was provided with
a writ, at the fuit of Madame Bernier, for a claim of 301. oil the
plaintiff. Mr. Hare did not fatisfy hinifelf with the Cafe, but hum-
' hie office of affilling the bailiff in the difcharge of his duty, but,
I before the autivoity was fliewn, or the officer had appeared, en-
I tered the houfe and (chant of the plaintiff, and there, in the pre-
I fence of the young !idea, concluded hinifelf in the molt violent
manner, affauhirg Mr. Mayew, his wife, and daughter, as well as
the gardener, and, in lon, every one who came in his way. For
the infult he received, and for the injury he fuftained, the plaintiff
now fought redrefa at the hands of sn Englilh Jury.
Many of the young ladies of the (chola appeared as witneffes,
and gave teftimony with all that heffialion and referve natural to
the modelty of female youth, as to the language and grofs deport-
ment of the Defendant.
Mr. kavis,for the Defendant, Rated, that the only queftion
for the Jury was, whether the Defendant acted in aid and affift-
ante of the bailiff, or whether he was lawfully endeavouring to
prevent the relate of the Plaintiff, as, in the latter cafe, the whole
of his condud would be juftifiable in law, although not perhaps
fo in point of decorum and humanity.
Among the witneffe3 on behalf of his client, he produced Mr.
\NIHON the Sheriff's officer, who did not materially vary the fadts

of the cafe.
Lord EL LttIaGROUC II Rated the nature of the salon, and fail
that the only ground utt which any salon of darnagcs would apply