Star.
London, England, 1823-07-19 00:00:00

•• -

cusTomatousg. RASTBOURNE
FOE SALE BY AUCTION,
At*, °aces at •11111daY 'sly, ma, at Ekren
r • oMe lo e Fors:Soon. •
yr&_under.mentioned Seised asd sndersned
WOW, or Home Coarainptloo, and not for less than

the Isi;Ort Outlast
About hS Glans if over proof GENEVA, •
5t ditto ditto BRANDY.
Also about 40 Fathoms of 1; inch RAFT ROPE,
And sundry broken.up-FLALF-ANKERS.
May be viewed on the Morning of the Sale.-
A deposit et LaS per Cent. will be required.

EXTENSIVE AND VALUABLE PRINTWORKS,
MILLS, AND FARM, IN PERTHSHIRE, •
FOR SALK
There will be exposed to SALE by PUBLIC AUCTION.,
within the George Inn, Perth, on FLIDAT, the Twenty-fourth
day of October next, at One o'Clock in the Afternoon (if not
prevlously Sold by Private Bargain),
rr HE extensive and .well-knoven PRINT-WORKS
A- of R'UTHVEN, with the PAPER, CORN, and BAR-
LEY-MILLS thereof, comprehending many powerful -
Water
falls; also the FARM of RUTH VEN, consisting of shoat TWO
HUNDRED and TWENTY SCOTS, or TWO HUNDRED
and SEVENTY-FIVE ENGLISH ACRES, or thereby; and
likewise a LEASE, whereof Thirty-one Years are yet to rnn,
of the.CASTLE of HUNTlNGTOWEB,"Dwefiltag:houses,
and Selsool-house, adjoining. •
This Property is situated withinAvio mike and Ahalf of ,the
City City and Shipping Port of Perth. The povrer and es ale
of
Machinery is more particularly mendirted below.
The Land is 91 saperlite quality and eitteUent cindition, all
under the plough and adapted to the most improved-syeteras of
Husbandry, particularly for raising greesicrops. add is inclosed
and subdivided breapiral Stone Fences, kite Parks,
of front Niue
to Fifteen Acres.
The Paper-Mill and a Park of about Nine Aeres, art letior
fifty-eight years, of which twenty-seven are stfil to Inn, at.the
lbw rent of £93 yearly.
The Corn and Barley-Mill.'with the multeres .of certain
Lands *strictest thereto, are occupied by &Tenant atlifilot the
moderate rent of £7O pee annum, and the remaining paetfolthe.
Land is In the occupation of the Proprietors, by whom the lain*
has been farmed for the lost thirty years, and is in the highest
state of cuttiettion.
The Property holds blench of a subject superior for payment I
of a penny Scots money yearly, in full of all casualties; the üb-
lic burdens are of very trifling amount ; and the Land-taxis re.
deemed. The rent payable for the Castle of Iluntingtower,
and other houses held in lease, is stet. 101. yearly.
Should the whole not he avid in one parcel, the following
parts thereof will, at the saute time and place, be exposed to
sale in One Lot :
with about Sixty Acres of.
ROTIIVEN PRINT-WORKS,
Land, Scots measure, adjacent thereto ; and the right of all the
Waterfalls within the bounds of these Sixty Acres.
This Lot will comprehend the winkle of the Workshops, Dwel-
ling and other Houses within the Gates ; the Water-wheels, Ma-
chinery, and Sluices connected therewith ; the Singeing and
Bleaching Apparatus, China and Navy-blue stone and V
iron ats,
Dying Coppers, Dash-wheels, and Biasing Vends; a DILI,
with Water-wheel for grinding Madder-toots, Alum, and Pipe-
clay; a complete Muriatic Acid Apparatus; Surface and Cylin-
der Printing Machines • Joining, Handkerchief, and Shawl
Printing Presses, with Copper-plates and Cylinders; Plain and
Eugraccd Pinning Tables, with Blocks, plain and cut—all of
an extent capl,'„,;•..- of bleaching, printing, and finishing from One
Hundred and Fifty Tuousaud to Two Hundred Thousand Pieces
of Goods annually :
Also, the Aisle in Tippetmuir Church, appropriated to these
Lards; and the Dwelling-houses situated without the Gates,
including the Castle of I tuntingtower, and other Houses, held
in Lease for the period thereof unexpired; and producing
together an Annual Rental of about .£450, subject to the Rent
payable under said Lease.
The Works will be kept in full employ until sold, so as the
Purchaser may have the advantage of immediately succeed-
ing to a long-established and widely-extended business; and the
perchase-money will be received in such instalments as may be
agreed upon.
ror further particulars, application may be made to Messrs.
John and James Miller, vriters, to Perth.
Perth, July 15,1643. .

PAHL! AMEN' VARY PROCEEDINGS.

nousr. OF LORDS, JULY 18.
This morning their Lordships met at a quarter before le, o'clock
when prayers being read by the ilishop of Exerts, they with-
drew to robe.
The Royal Assent was given to several Dills, see the STAR
of yesterday.
Upon the return of the Loan Cattail:claws who had retired
to uurobe, the hearing of Appeals was resumed.
The decision of the House (see the Stan of Thursday) in the
case of " Sir James Duff v. the Earl of Fife," was read by the
Clerk at the table, as a final judgment.
The LORD CHANCELLOR next mentioned the Appeal,
front the Court of Chancery in Ireland, of the " Earl of Ross v.
Sterling," and stated, that tin account of the absence of a Noble
at.d Learned Friend, whn had for many years presided in that
Court, he thought it absolutely necessary that the cause should
'he postponed till neat Session: especially as he bad been assured
by that• Learned Person, that he felt It impossible to bestow on
the cause, at present, that sleep attettion it deserved.—Judg-
went deferred.
ItOIiCAT Toasts, plaintiff in error. v. JOUR IPKRAN and Ws:.
Pusivits, defendants in error.
The defendants in error had obtained, in the Court of Coins
mon Pleas, a verdict against the plaintiff in error, for £2220 12s.
with £4l 17s. 51. for damages and costs.
Mr. Teas ea thereupon brought a Writ of Error in the Court
of King's Bench, which was argued, and judgment in the Court
of Common „Pleas was ginned, with £4B. 10s. colts.
Upon this affirmance the plaintiff brought another Writ of
Error, returnable in Parliament, in which Errors were assigned;
and the same was set down for. hearing as this day.
The Lou!) CHANCELLOR (to the defendants' Counsel)—
Are there any Counsel for the plaintiff fit Error ?
i
Mr. Collinson—No my Lord.
The LOUD Cll ANCELLOW—What costs have been in-
curred by.the defendants in Error?
Mr. CoUinson.—One hundred and ten pounds, my Lord.
The LORD CHANCELLOR-1s it your Lordship? plea-
, sure that the judgment of the Court of King's Sancti be at
with £llO costs?--Judgment affirmed.
Joan Hmar &arm, and others, v. the Rev. Si.. Dates, Clerk.
This cause, which had been partly beard on the t9th and 22d
of July, t 822, wasthen ordeved to stand over, and keep its place,
in or to afford an opportunity of rectifying the Decree of the
Court Wow (lingliali Court of Exchequer) on wane points not
appealed from. It relates to certain descriptions of tithes claimed
by the respondent, as Vicar of the Vicarage and Parish Church
• of Xatinfirld, in the County and Moms of York.
Mr. Martin was Mum. in coaclistion, for the Reverend re-
spondent, and Mr. Wetherell in reply.
The LORD CRANCRLLOR rose, and stated the several
polies in dispute bowmen these parties; but, u the.Nolde and
Learned Lord (Roiesdale), who had beard the greater part of
the forseastre.oed amaidered the whole matter with his usual
atteosivo, badbees obliged to leave thsaimare, it would neither
be deearoos use just tau= to judgment, without having the
benefit and valuable of that Noble and Learned Lord's
°piston. -Mock therefore, as Ise (she lord Chancellor) lamented
the wesedity otimbiecting the Viper. mad his parishioners to the
robes/ of having such a wit as this farther protracted, his Lord-
shiplaund hansolf constrained to moves that its farther and final
cassiisrssyna d!ifomed IMO the second day for causes in next

Delliellerswsswe.
Wagons v. Kum
This mass, which has coos by Appal from the Court of
is Ireland, wee heard at the Ito several "robe ago.
fts LORD CHANCELLAA. went on; dee several peril.
esters at the cast. an sated. that, although les fend end-
eisbis dakoky i onneerring nth* with dee woo of tbs
Doom
se wee 1t agreed !Wnny ok yst k was4es to the Inns sad Lemuel
Chem is that Owttt to Psestersevdites
soy sterner Vo thiseintieess In sid
rad hard the wink of do wannest.le sew pcoyeedi sad It

'Wadded by the House, that this appeal should stand Me
Midi the first canoe dar In nest Session.
Vie IWr of Santa= took the oaths and his Seat.
at halt after one o'clock, dulling pleasure ; and at.
" after four the Hesse resumed. s.l
tumor, from the Navy Prize thee, presented* Se.,
false die Mount of Fees paid on Account of Prises. :
Lord COLCHESTER presented a Fetid= from the Debtor-al
in the King's Bench Prison, praying for Antandmenta in the
Insolvent Act.
Upon the motion of the Earl of SuartissintV. the Exchequer .
Bills (17 millions) Diu was read a third time, passed, and mes-
saged to the Commons. •
ROMAN CATHOLICS.
Lord COLCHESTER rose for the purpose of
moving some Returns with regard to the' Roman
Catholics of England in particular. From the votes
of the other House, it appeared that a measure was
likely to be agitated in a future Session, which must
affect the Protestant interest in this country;' and,
therefore, he considered it ptoper that their Lordships
should be put in possession of all the information to
be had before such a measure was adopted by eider
House. With this view he intended to move, in the
first place, for a Return of the Number of Roman
Catholic Chapels in England; he also had to move,
secondly, for a Return of the Number of Roman Ca-
tholic Schools, Academies, and Places of Education=,
then, thirdly, for an Account of the Aggregate of the
Religious Houses; also of Persons who belonged to
Monastic Institutions, or were under the Monastic
Vow. He believed that. only one Romish College,
that of Maynooth, was under the safeguard of law ;
but it was notorious that there was an Educational
Institution at Stonehurit, new under the directioe
of persons who attended the last eiectioq for Jesuitel
at Rome; and he also knew that remonstrances hid:,
been made, even at Rome, against placing the Eng-
lish and Irish (Catholic) pupils under the tuition of,
the Jesuits. There was, besides, a splendid religious
establishment of the same complexion in the county of
Somerset, whose inmates- were itinerating. so nuke
over new proselytes, and who, in some instances,.liad'
purchased fresh converts to their fold. lie, whin'
acting as Secretary of State for Ireland, found' that
there were• sixty-seven ftOtnan Catholic "Religiotoi'.
Houses in that • portion of the United Kingdom;
while there was also an equal number, in proportion
to those establishments, of persons bound by monastic
vows. Nothing, he conceived, added more -toahe ex-
istence of a Protestant Government than-to know,
from authentic sources, the.number of Roman Catho
lies which its toleration had embraced. It was upon
these grounds, and for the inforMation of their Lord-
ships in the event of ulterior steps, that he proposed
to move an humble Address•to his Majesty, that he-
would be graciously pleased to cause .directions to
be given to the A rch'sislsops and bishops of the
Church of England to procure, through the Pazochiat
Clergy, the Returns he had specified to the House.
The Earl of ROSSLYN Said, that he svas extremely ,
sorry to hear the motion made by the... Noble Lord,
as he felt it incumbent on him to oppose it. The
motion, in his opinion, was made upon no distinct
grounds, and was calculated to produce much mis-
chief, though he certainly would not charge the No-
ble Lord himself with a mischievous intent in making
it. The presumed Bill from the other House, to which
the motion had reference, was not before their Lord
ships, and, pei haps, it never might be befOre-them
so that, in reality, there was no measure that called
for the Noble Lord's motton ; on the Witt'.
hand, there was ample time for their Lordships to
stand upon the defensive when assailed by the so
much apprehended Bill. It would, therefore, be
more becoming to abstain from such motions as those
submitted by the Noble Lord, till their Lordships saw
clearly what the House of Commons would do.—
Here the Noble Lord's remarks were interrupted by
MESSAGES PROM Tuz COMMONS.
Mr. Lusumwrox and tither* brought up the New South Wales
Jurisdiction Bill, the Ireland Tithes Composition Bill, and the
General Turnpike Act Amendment Bill, with their Lordships'
Amendments agreed to.
ThiEarl of ROSSLYN resumed.—He had before
said, that the Noble Lord.-(Colchester) had not made
out sufficient grounds for the motion he had sub-
mitted to the House; and it was also most singular
that the motion did not extend to Ireland, as though
the Noble Lord feared to embrace that part of the
United Kingdom in it. With respect to the notice
of a Bill in the other House, upon which the Noble
Lord's motion 'rested,- it - should be recollected that
this embryo measure went only to provide for the
education of Roman Catholics in Ireland ; and, .there-
fore; he should like to know upon what principle the
House wished to require that species of information
with regard to England, where no' apprehension of
danger could possibly be felt? It was known, indeed,
that no Monastic Institutions could legally be rooted
in England; and the Noble Lord. aware of this point,
called them reputedly such. Why excite, then, a
feeling of commotion and disturbance, so calculated
to hold Gut the Roman Catholics not merely. to po-
pular clamour, but also to attacks? He disliked, more
than all, that the Established Clergy of this 'country
Should be made the instruments of such an inquisi-
tion, and this for no beneficial end. With regard to
the inquiry as to the number of persons now under
the conscientious force of monastic vows, be never
knew so abominably inquisitorial a motion as that
which the Noble Lord had proposed to the House;
and he must say, that it came forward with a peon-
Rally ill grace at this season of the year, when the
passing of Bills was finishing, and when the formali-
ties of the House were suspended by a tacit consent
on both sides, so that no summons could be issued for
the attendance of Noble Lords. The motion was, to
my the least against it, excessively rash, fraught, in
his opinion, with much danger, and could be pro-
dative of-ftermanner of good. He should therefore
give his decided opposition to the motion.
LEGISLATIVII CONVIIRSWCZIL
Mr. C. WYNN and several others from the House
-of Commons brought up a Message to inform 'their
Lordships that the Commons desired a conference on
the subject matter of a Bill for regulating the Co&
missary Court of Edinburgh.
The Deputation from the Commons then withdrew,
but were soon called in, when they were answered by
the LORD CIiANCU.LOP., that their Lordships had
consented to the conference required by the- other
House, and appointed it to be held in the related
Chamber forthwith.
'Viscount MELVILLE then moved that the Lord
President of the Council, the Chairman of the Coop
mimeos, the Eirl of Rossiya, the Lord Irish,* of 113 A.
don, Viscount Melville, Lord Stowell, and Lord

peaky, direladie be deputed to meet; the Members *of
the Ow
Urn tlx return a( the deputed Lords, after the
reading of a Report from the Lord President, it was
agr ed that their Lordships would not insist on their
amendments in the Bill mentioned by the Commons.
The LORD CHANCELLOR took this opportu-
nity to defend the conduct of the Noble Baron (Col.
,•Chester) in submitting the motion he had made, foi
there could exist no doubt whatever, that the Bill so
likely to have originated in the other House was in-
tended to repeal the law of the land with respect to`
religious houses. If hereafter such a measure should
ever reach this House, he had only to hope that it
would not arrive at a late period of the Session next
year, but that full opportunity would be given to
examine and discuss it. But at present he hoped the
Noble Lotri (Colchester), to the honour and purity of
whose motives all who knew him must do justice,
'would consent to withdraw his motion.
After a short reply from Lord COLCHESTER,
who wished, if the projected Bill happened to be re-
newed in the next Session, that his motion should be
,taken as notice of ,renewal, and on an explanation
from the Earl of ROSSLYN, the motion was withdrawn.
Another short conference was..afterwards held be-
tween the Houses, in the Painted Chamber, on the
subject matter of the Scotland Confirmations Bill,
when the same deputation of Peers as before met the
Members of the other House; and upon the report
of the Lord President, it was agreed, as in the former'
case, that their Lordships would not insist on their'
amendmenti.--About a quarter before seven o'clock
their Lordships adjourned until to•mortow, at three.
HOUSE OF COMMONS.
The House, pursuant to a Commission, met at ten o'clock this
day, and proceeded to the House of Lords, to hear the Royal
Authority given to several Bills—The East India Mutiny Oft
.Millbank Penitentiary Bill, and others—(for which see Leeds
II new").
tbs SPEAKER adjourned the House till four o'clock, art.
which hour it resumed.
IRISH TITHES COMPOSITION BILL.
On the Order of the Day for considering the amend.
Intents made by the Lords to the Irish Tithes Com-
position Bill,
• A conversation took place between Mr. CALCRAPT,
Mr. Goutatnett, and Col. TRENCH, who was proceed
ins to observe upon the inexpediency of conceding
Catholic Emancipation, when
• Mrs. Secretary CANNING rose to order.
The
r House was taken by surprise by this unexpected dii-
eassion upon a very important measure.
CoIoneITRENCH bowed to the sense of the Hotise.
The amendments were then agreed to.
The Lords' Amendments to the New South Wales
Hill were then agreed to.
SCOTCH COMMISSARY COURTS PILL.
• On the queition for agreeing to the Lords' amend.'
swots to the Scotch Commissary Courts Bill,
• Lord A. HAMILTON rose to object to the amend.
Silents to a Bill, which, in his opinion, was a Money'
Bill; The Noble Lord moved as an amendment, that
the 13111 should be read on that day three months.
The SPEAKER was satisfied that the alteration
'alluded tn did not in anywise affect the privileges of
that House, •
Mr. J. P. *GRANT said that the House of Com-,
mons had sent up a Bill to the. Lords, in which it was
,enacted that the existing fees should continue for a
specific tithe; but the Lords had prolonged that time.l
Mr. CALCRAFT considered this alteration •as
interferente with the privileges of the. House.
Mr. PEEL thought there were sufficient grounds
`for inducing the House to agree to this Bill. There
Was no evidence whatever that tbe.fees under the new
Bill were not higher than those under the old mea-
sure. The Act of the Lords watznerely the continu-
ance of a legal duty.
Mr. ABERCROMBY conceiverUliat the clause
referred to by the Noble Lord clearly proved that
there was an interference on the part of the Lords,
unwarranted by the privileges of that House.
Mr. KEITH DOUGLAS considered, that no in-
terference whatever had been made with the privi-

iege sof the House of Commons. •
-111 r. BRIGHT said, this was a Bill creating new
fees, and therefore the fees were removed from that
authority which- he House of Lords would other wise
have perhaps aright-to exercise. •
Mr. CROKER observed, thaethe*House of Lords
did not legitimatise or legalise the old fees t they would
have continued to be collected had this Bill never
been passed.
Mr. CANNING said, the question here was, Whe-
ther any new duty were imposed by, the Lords'
Amendments? The 'conviction on his mind was that
there was not.
Mr. W. WY.NN said the objection was rather to
the form than to the spirit of the clause alluded to.
Mr. J. P. GRANT observed, that they objected to
the form of the Bill as altered, and that was eno
to reader it improper to be agreed to by this House.
Mr.CANNING suggested a conference with the
Lords as to the clause, to which he had no doubt they
would accede.
The Amendment was then put and negatived.
Several verbal amendments were agreed to.
Mr. CANNING moved that a Committee be ap-
pointed to confer with the Lords, on the clause of
their Lordships negatived by this House.
The Committee was then appointed, and repaired
to the Painted Chamber to confer with the Lords.
A Message from the Lords anaohnced their Lord-
ships' agreement to the Exchequer Bills Bill, and the
Appropnation Bill, without any-atnendment.
SPITALTIELDS SILL.
Mr. CALCRAFT said he should be glad to know
if the Lords Amendments to the Spitalfselds Bill were
i brought down, as he wished to see what their
Lordships bad rend. of it, after granting an inquiry
denied by the House of Commons ?
Mr. HUSKISSON said the Bill came before them
in so very OM:reit a shape from that which it origi-
nally bore, so many, of thc obnoxious regulations
were left starepeided, that in his view of the subject
would-set be scow with a dee regard to the pub-
lic interest, nor consistently with his own recorded
opinions, if- he moved gin the House should concur
.in those asiendinents.
Mr. CAI.CRAPT congratulated all parties con:
eased, that the Lords bad so_far mutilated the Bill
as that it would apt sour Ise- passed. He had seen
manly differences of opinion amongst his Majesty's
Ninisfr%Dot on!yarto matters of trade but ot taste,
and in house. rave nom than on this occasion.
Mr. ABE rR MBY regretted that the opportu