Star.
London, England, 1802-12-24 00:00:00

he has s. thus (tripped of the wife of his hotel% and
deprived of the patent of his child, namely, by
deftroliiii his charaller, and infinnating that he
was himfelf the caufe of the loft of his wife's vir.i
tee, of which he ought to have been the guardian
and proteaor. He has Rated the plaintiff as guilty
of criminal negligence towards his wife; and by'
that negligence facilitating thatlapfe from honour
by Which the bas involved herfelf and her but
band in ruin. How this charge has been madei
out it will be for. you 'to fay ; and whether the
injury done by the defendant, is not much ag-
gravated by the way in which he has thought
fit to !tape his defence ? It has been wade out
by imputing negligence to the plaintiff in 'fat-
fering his wife to be with a man, with regard,
to whom, after what pallid on the illumination
night, he ought to have .been on his:gaard. As
to the eircumtlance that took place on ate illumine-
don night, do let ns fee how a Rands, and whe-
ther there are any grounds of fufpicion, to the
prejudice of the Plaintiff, for permitting his wife
to hang upon the arm of his friend, upon an occa-
lion when it was neceffary the thould have the' pro-
' teEtion of a man ? In the common courtefies of life,
if a man has a friend he can truft, he generally, on.
any party of pleafure, takes fome other female un-
der his charge, add anions his wife to that friend.
In what friend did the Plaintiff repofe this con-
fidence?—in a friend whom he had Gwyn attention
to at a time when his heart was &lining under the
loft of a beloved wife. When Would any one
fuppofe a man fartheft from purpofes of gallantry
and feduaion ? Surely-at fuch a time as this, un-
lefs we are to confider fociety In polluted in this
bad age, that we are to fufpeEt pur molt intimate
friends. In this fituation they went out on.a night
when every one knew tbatfiseb a.party Thight be in-
nocently walking out. They were fepartted by the
crowd ; a eircumftancc extremely likely to hap-
pen. Could the plaintiff fufpe& that a woman, with
whom be bad been living in harmony for a year
a half, had been mifpending her time by
going to a Brothel; for that is the infinuation of
the witoefs, Charles Hunt, though he knew the
MS at tome place at Spring Gardens, and did not
sinnainunicate that fa& to us at firft. It turned
out the had come home after her hifband's party,
and the account given by the girl who was fervent
in the Loufe was,. that Ike faid they had been wan-
dering all over the town in fearch of their friends.
you, under Poch circa:ilium% have fuf-
peeed any mifchief ? Then what follows ? The
.whole defence depends entirely on the evidence of
'Charles Hunt, who tells you the Plaintiff was
guilty offome negligence in (aerial/ the Defeo:
'dand, after this, to take his wife out ua
.'a claire ;
but though there was an attempt to difguife the
,faa, it appears the Defendant's fon, a of eight
or nine years of age, was with them.—r ' tlimits
mutt there be to our jealoufy, if conduit like this
is to excite fufpiciou I Gentlemen, Iwtll not detail
the evidence, I do not with to occupy moreof your
time than is neeefary. I have no one übfetyndwil
to offer, by which I can Wield this ddendnat frank
the full reparation you may be difpofad us make
in favour of the plaiatiff,who hu ha4aevery focial
sight invaded by a falls friend, who has violated
away moral virtue.
The Jury, without a minute's' befitation,
turned a verdia for the Plaintiff—Danisges soool.
1NC2112211. 23.

PATIKT toa lILSACHING
TIVANT W. ♦ALLSY,
This was an anion of thcui

the Manufaiturers of this 9nuntry,
40 the World in general, iutfmr
Alid the Monopoly of one of the
e-overks for the promotion of
been dearoyeß,andthe procefs'.
ia now thrown open to every one
to adopt it.
Mr. &smut Rated the cafe on the part of the
Plaintiff. After Tome general nbfervations on the
neceffity of fecuring to the ingenious the profits of
their inventions,. he Rated the invention of this
~Bleaching Liquid by the Plaintiff to have been
one of the molt ufeful difcoveries of modern times.
It correßed all the impede/lions of the former.
procelles, for bleaching, and was a mod material
raving in point of expence. The Plaintiff, who
was the bra inventor, obtained a patent for the
invention in the year 1798, and had ever finee ex-
clufively enjoyed it, until the Defendants, who are
Bleachers at Bolton, thought of manufaßuring it.
This was tech a dire& violation of his Patent, that
he thought it necefary to bring this anion to vin-
dicate his rights.
The difcovery which the Plaintiff claimed as his
own, and which he fpecified in his patent, was a
method of ufing Gaiter:situ Zarthr, for the purpofe
of neutralizing the exnenated muriatici acid gar. The
hißory of this improvement was fo conneßed with
that of the proceffes formerly ufed in bleaching,
that it was necefary to Rate them all. Formerly
inthes were the only article ufed to alfill the opera-
lions of nature in bleaching linen or cotton. After-
wards the oxygenated muriatic acid, was intro-
'.eaced, but it was found to have too powerful an
laiSion both on the colours, when any were wove
into the fabric, and on the texture of the cloth it-
(elf. To remedy this inconvenience, recourfe was
nest had to alkalis, to neutralize the oximuriatic
acid, before expofing the goods to its aftion : this
was found to anfwer pretty well, but the quantity
.of pot or pearl afh required in this procefs render.
jd it fo very expenfive, that it became a defidera-
tip to difcover a cheap fubttitute poffeffing the
isme, or fuperior detergent powers, which was
completely effeßed by the di(co:E claimed
under this patent. The difecuon7, rub-
Pitting lime for potafe,sind in blips the
, Jim, which theltne is put, and the gas
paires4 to dt Ive, by means of quetson,
• gar veldt, of the oximuriate of lime, r*
• cad bytlie untofit of the oximuriatic acid and
the lime, than could 10.'difolved without agita-
tion. This is the pginciple of the belt and cheapen
bleaching liquid ever invented ; for which the in-
'autos jußty obtained a pAIXIItt which the condual
of the Defendant had obliged him to fupport by
the prafent wQuld ha exceed the Ibpits
figfAstiff IPS/A*7olre 141jf,IP $ bis 4,
I. 441 '

Lir.
=oft importance to
Itry, tnacieace, and
necb2 the Ter-
m me* sable dill
the Arts has
i-of its brahnfaenti
Ine who isarthoofe