Star.
London, England, 1822-03-05 00:00:00

HENRY HUNT.

Mr. Alderman WOOD rose to present a Petition
from an individual with whose ca•a. the House was
already acquainted, and he begged its attention while
he referred to a recent cruelty exercised against
Henry Hunt in lichester Jail. Ile did not wi ill to
trouble the House at any length, and he thought he
would best consult the interests of Mr. Ilunt, by say-
ing as little as he could consistently with his duty.
That morning he received two letters relative to the
cruelties which were practised against that indivi-
dual ; he thought such rigorous and harsh confine-
ment was exceeding the sentence pa,sed on him, and
sheaved a disposition to treat him more severely than
(alters who might have merited a heavier punishment.
Ile thought it cruel to confine him sa "clo,ely and
rigorously" as he himself described it. Mr. Hunt
stated, that on entering the jail he was not even
treated with the usual indulgence granted to other
individuals confined under the sentence of the King's
Bench. Ile would beg the attention of the House
while he read some extracts from the letters he had
received; in one of them it was stated "that Dr.
Colston, one of the visiting Magistrates, discovered,
on Thursday last, that Mr. Hunt had a small door
which gave air to his apartment, though the sun did
not shine on it for more than five months of the year,
and the door had been left open by Mr. Hunt's pre-
decessor, yet on Dr. Colston 's discovering it, he or-
dered it to be immediately shut." But that was not
half the cruelty exercised towards that individual ; it
would be seen by the following extract from anot!ier
letter, the extent of the cruelty to which he was sub-
jected—." His eyes were so seriously injured in con-
sequence of sitting up from five to twelve o'clock,
that he was almost blind; a tumor contracted at the
bottom of one of his eyes, in order to extract which
he was obliged to submit to a very painful operation.
He wished to have his son and ward to see and at-
tend him, but the Magistrates having learn'ed what
was going forward, Hardy, the jailer, refu=sed them
admittance, saying, that if he (Mr. Hum) was dying
he could not admit them. Ilk surgeon ordered it
constant application of cold water to his eyes, and
certified the necessity of his being attended by a
nurse, but the reply to his application for one was,
that he might have one of the women convicts if he
pleased. The key was turned on his apartment at
six o'clock, and his son and ward were again refused
admission; thus he,Was left alone blind in that state
until five o'clock in the morning, and kept tinging
the bell the greater part of the night, when at lenmh
some warm water was brought him, but the door
was again shut." He (Mr. Alderman Wood) ap-
pealed to the feelings of the House, if they would
suffer an individual in that state to be treated with
such hardship and cruelty. Hardy, the jailer, he
admitted shewed every disposition to lessen the rigour
of Mr. Hunt's confinement, but he was prevented by
the Magistrates. (Mr. Alderman Wood) was
shocked at the treatment used towards Mr. Hunt :
he could not contemplate that any person confined
for such an offence, should be so treated. He would
not refer to the Report of the Commissioners until.
the subject came before• the House; but he would
obServe, 'that he had no doubt of the truth of Mr.
Hunt's statements, because in all those he had made
to him, on examination, he found them borne out 17
the facts. Hu was sorry that the Right Hon. Seem.
tart' (Mr. Peel) was not in the House, as he hoped
that he would
.cause wore lenient measures to be used
• :
•
. -

• •

-

7 .

lessen the term
_ to the present 7
state, that as soon as,
found he had the authority, he sent to have more
dulgence allowed Mr. Hunt. The Hon. Member con.
cluded by moving that the Petition be brought up.
Mr. DICKINSON also noticed the order of the
High Sheriff. and added, that Mr. Hunt would-now
be placed in the same situation in which he was before
the regulations complained of. •
Mr. BENNET sad the Rev. Divine was far from
adhering to the doctrines of his DIVINR MASTIERI
whose precepts he professed to follow—who said, WI
was imprisoned and ye visited me." The ccmtrari
seemed to be the spirit by which he was guided. MI
thought that some relaxation of the treatment towaids
Mt. Hunt ought to be adopted.
Mr. HOBHOUSE rose to observe, that he thought
it incumbent on Ministers to alleviate the punish-
ment of Mr. Hunt, and remove him to some jail
snore fit to be inhabited thin IlchesterJail. It ought
to ber recollected, that it was said by some Honour-
able Gentlemen, both at that side of .the House and
at the other, that Mr. Hunt was sent to Ilchester Jail
as a favour ; but as it was slow proved on incontro-
vertible evidence that it was not habitable, be thought
the-House ought to lose no time in relieving him ;
and it should recollect, while the Petition was even
printing the individual was suffering. He concluded
by observing, that it was the duty of the House to
prevent any aggravation of punishment.
Mr. SCARLETT said, that as the Hon. Gentle-
man alluded to him, he merely wished to observe,
that at the time the sentence was passed, Ilchester
Jail was thought the fittest place of confinement, and
general opinion was in its favour.
Mr. C. W. WYNN said, that it was the duty of the
Magistrates of the County to apply a remedy; that
the Crown was vested with no pewer to transmit from
one jail to another ; and if it had the power of trans-
mitting, in order to mitigate punishment, it would
also have the power of transmitting to aggravate it.
Mr. DENMAN said, that the sentence might be
commuted by consent of both parties.
Mr. LOCKHART said, that a notice should have
been given of a motion to establish the facts in the
Petition, before any measures were adopted.
Dr. LUSHINGTON said, that it appeared from
the Report of the Commissioners, that in the space
of nine months, nine distinct orders were made as to
the visiting of strangers. The Magistrates unfortu-
nately resorted to a remedy which aggravated the
situation of the individual; they applied to two of
the Judges, who made rules which bound them up,
and left them no discretion of their own; that was
an error the Magistrates had fallen into, because it
was never intended that the Judges should lay down
rules in such cases; it was only in cases where felons
might escape that they had such power, but it never
extended to misdemeanours, much less to political
offences. The Magistrates were now prevented from
acting on their own responsibility, and laying
.down
another set of rules which would grant more indul-
gence. He thought it would be of great utility if an
inspector were appointed in all jails, to watch the
conduct of the jailer, and every transaction with the
jail, and when any impropriety occurred to give in-
formation of it to the Magistrates. The Hon. Gentle-
man said, it would shortly be his duty to present a
Petition from Ikhester, praying that Mr. Hunt's con-
finement might be mitigated.
Mr. Alderman ATKINS supported the Petition.
He said, though he was no friend to Mr. Hunt, he
otr4lit not to suffer mote punishment than the Judges
and the law intended.—The Petition was then laid
on the table, and ordered to be printed.
Dr. LUSHINGTON presentvd a Petition, signed by many
irhabitants of Ilchester, praying for a mitigation of Henry
hunt's punishment.
Sir ISAAC COFFIN supported the Petition, as he bad been
called upon so to do by his constituents.—The Petition was laid
on the table, and ordt red to be printed.
Sir ROI;EKT WILSON presented another Petition from
Eccles, in Lancashire, which, he said, was numerously signed
by the inhabitants of that town, praying that Henry Hunt may
be released front confinement altogether.. The Petition referred
to transactions which he should ever consider as a disgrace t•
the County, but it was not now necessary to enter further on
them.—The Petition was then brought up and laid on the table.
IRISH TITHE'''.

Sir JOHN NEWPORT said he rose on a very im-
portant subject, and prayed the attention of the House
while he 'elated the nature of a Petition which he
held in his hand ; it was on a subject which he con-
sidered to form a principal ingredient in the scenes
which were now passing in Ireland. The Petition
was from the Corporation of the town he had the
honour to represent. The Petitioners were the pos-
sessors of impropriate tithes to a considerable extent:
in the Petition they stilt( d that many evils arise from
the present tithe system, and called upon the House
to make any modification in it which might remove
those evils; they also stated that they were confident
a modification of the system would reconcile the
Laity and Clergy, and, above all, enable the labour-
ing classes to enjoy their tillage at a cheaper rate
than usual. Such was the purport of the Petition ;
but to give the House an idea of the system, he would
mention a fact, which he had on the most respectable
authority, such as left no doubt of its truth. It
would convince the house that the Clergy were not
those who received the best part of the tithes, but the
proctors, or middle men. A Dignitary of the Church
who resided in the county of Tipperary, employed a
proctor to collect his tithes. The proctor went to a
farmer, from whom he demanded 301. as due for
tithes; the farmer said it was an overcharge, and
lie would not pay it; the proctor replied, that if he
would not, he would cite him before the Ecclesiasti-
cal Court. The farmer, intimidated by the threat of
citation, offered him 291. which was all the money
lie had. The proctor refused it, and the farmer went
to borrow the other 11. On his return he met the
Dignitary, to whom he gave the 30/. He asked why
he gave him so large a sum, as his tithes amounted
only to 111. Such a system, he said, ought to be
probed to the bottom. He could not, if he had it not
from the most respectable authority, have believed
overcharge possible. Under these circum-
the House would take the tithe sys-
and concluded by moving
ight up.
,aid he would merely observe
already ender the consideration
He could not now say
(timate decision, but as an earnest
,t indifferent to them, they di-
appointed to examine into

Mr.LANGSTON said the
on the tithe system, ought not to be eatillsed to he-
land, it should also be attended to in,England.
Mr. HUMS said he was also anxious tole= from
the Noble Mirquisif the tithe system' in England oc-
copied tho attention of Government: he could assure
him it was one of considerable importance ?
The Petition was then laid on the table.
Sir JOHN NEWPORT said, as he was aware the
Petition was under the consideration of Government,
he would do no more than present the Petition: how-
ever, the existence of the evil was undisputed.
Lord EBRINGTON wished to learn if there was
any measure in contemplation se itls regard to the tithe
for land ?

system _
The Marquis of LONDONDERRY said he was
not aware that any measure was in contemplation ;
but if information was required, it was usual to give
notice of it.

AGRICULTURAL LISTRISS.
Lord EBRINGTON rose to present a Petition from
Hans, South Devonshire, signed by two hundred re-
spectable inhabitants. It set out with representing
the great degree of agricultural distress that existed,.
and prayed a repeal of the salt, malt, leather, and
soap taxes. The Noble Lord appealed to the Hon.
Member for Exeter (Mr. Newman), as to the respect-
ability of the petitioners, and concluded by moving
that the Petition be brought up.
Mr. NEWMAN bore testimony to the respectabi-
lity of the petitioners, and the truth of the allega-
tions in the Petition as to the existence of agricurtu-s
ral distress.—Laid on the table, and to be printed.

NAVY FIVE PER CENTS.
Mr. ELLICE rose, and said he held in his hand a
Petition from an individual residing at Brompton.
The petitioner Complained that he had not sufficient
time to declare, as he was obliged to consult four
trustees, who were not in the country at present, and
prayed that such alteration be made in the Bill as
would give him time. The lion. Gentleman moved
that the Petition be brought up.
The-CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said,
it was advisable that the Bill should pass without de-
lay and in its present form, leaving to the House to
apply a remedy to any particular case that may occur.
Mr. TIERNEY said he wished to learn on what,
day the Report was to be brought up? He was also
of opinion that the Bill should be as little conform-
able as possible to Mr. Pelham's Bill. •
After some conversation across the table, between
the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER and Mr. TIER..
NEY, it was agreed that the Report be brought up on
Thursday next.
' Mr. GRENIFELL wished to know if any agree-
went had been made with the Bank as to remunera-
tion for its services in the proposed measure? In the
loans made by the Bank during the war, the Cashier
received a remuneration of £BOO on every million.
It would appear that a sum of £4.00,000 had been
paid to the Cashier for these labours. The House
ought now to consider that the sum to be dealt with
was 155 millions, and that, however low the per
tentage might be, it would become very considerable cm
so large a sutra. Unless some alterations were made in
the Bill on those points, he (Mr. Grenfell) should
think it his duty to give it his decided opposition.
On the motion that the Petition be read,

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER wished
t•) notice, that as it was through the agency of the
Bank of England the business was to be transacted
with the holders of the Stock, there was a blank for
a clause in the Bill to provide for a remuneration to
that Corporation for the trouble which would neces-
sarily devolve on them. It was not, however, yet
possible to know what trouble they wculd be at, and
for that reason he thought proper to leave the ques-
tion open for the consideration of the House.
Mr. G RENFELL thought that the advantages al-
ready derived to the Bank of England from the ma-
nagement of the public money, would be a full and
fair remuneration for any additional trouble they
might have on the present occasion. He had an ac-
count put into his hands which stated those advan-
tages. They should not then seek remuneration fot
any little set vices of that kind. On account of the
management of the public monies for Government,
the Bank was paid annually £270,000. That was the
sum which they received last year, and would conti-
nue to receive, unless Government reduced the al-
lowance. Besides the charge for management, they
derived other considerable advantages from their deal-
ings with Government. They had last year a balance
of the public money in their hands of nearly four
millions—it was no less than £3,900,000. On that
sum they had, by their discounts, as much profit as
any private bank. If the Exchequer Bills to the
amount of £1,400,000, which formed a part of that
£t4900,000 were deducted from it, there would be a
remainder of £2,500,000, which, at 3 per cent. per
annum, would give a profit of £75,000. He would
state, without fear of contradiction, that all the ser-
vices rendered by the Bank of England would be per-
formed by a private bank for the mere use of such a
balance lying in their hands; if the wisdom of Go.
vernment allowed another Banking Corporation, they
need be at no loss by the management of the public
money. A private bank, he was well convinced,
would do for £lO,OOO, what the Bank of England
received a sum of between four and £500,000 tor.
Sir ROBERT WILSON said, that while on that
subject, he would put to the Noble Marquis (Lon-
donderry) a question on a subject which was connected
with it, and which, in his opinion, was entitled to an
answer. The question which he wished to put was,
whether, within a few days past, any advices had
reached his Majesty's Government, by which they
would be enabled to entertain any opinion on a sub-
ject to which strong allusion was made in his Majesty's
Speech from the Throne, on the opening of the Ses-
sion of Parliament—he meant the continuance of
peace between Russia and Turkey ?
The Marquis of LONDON DE R RY having.restated
the question, observed that it was unwise in Hon.
Members to ask such questions,which were calculated
to excite alarm. To obviate the effect of the ques-
tion put to him, he was very happy to say that there
was so room for alarm.

not mesa to attribute any improper motives to the
Hon. Member, but he wished tosourage the put-
ting of questions, the tendency of which would be to'
create alarm.—:After a few wards from Mr. ELLICE,
Mr. HUME said that he would wish to ask the
Right Hon. Gentleman (the Chancellor of the Ex-
cliequer) whit remuneration he intended for the
Bank ? The Bank of England had profited well by
the public money. Tbey-had received so much for
their management during the war, that they became
the richest banking corporation in gurope. The
Bank of Ireland managed the public money of that
country without any remuneration. In one way or
another, a sum of 940,0001. or 860,0001. was paid
annually to the Bank. He hoped the House would
not suffer the Bill to pass without negativing the
clause granting any remuneration to the Bank for
any trifling additional trouble that might be given
them by that business. The Bank received too much
for their services, and the country had a right to
expect that Government would make a reduction in
the allowances.—The Petition was then read and or-

dered to lie on tLe table.
Mr. BENNET asked if the Right Hon. Gentleman
(the Chancellor of the Exchequer) meant to carry the
Bill through -its several stages that night? for if he
did, he would feel it his duty to oppose it.
The C H A NC E LLOR °idle EXCHEQUER moved
the Order of the Day for the House resolving itself
into a Committee on the Navy Five per Cents.
Transfer Bill.
Mr. GRENFELL suggested that it would be ad-
visable to leave out the clause which, in general
terms, empowered the Treasury to remunerate per-
sons for assisting to carry the Bill into execution. At
present it was impossible to tell what would be the
necessary labour of the Bank, and he strongly ob-
jected to the clause in its present general state.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said
the circumstance of the degree of labour being as yet
unascertainable, was, in his opinion, a reason for
adopting the clause, subject to the futute approba-
tion of Parliament.
The House having resolved itself into a Commit-
tee, the Bill was agreed to, except the clause in ques-
tion; upon the reading of which,
Mr. GRENFELL said, he certainly should take
the sense of the Committee upon the subject.
Mr. ELLICE said, that on the third reading of die
Bill he should propose a clause respecting the time
allowed for dissenting to the measure.
Mr. GRENFELL said, the reasoning of the Chan-
cellor of the Exchequer had not convinced him. He
did not think the number of assenters or dissenters
would materially affect the labour of the Bank ; but
whether it did or not, he thought it would be better
to make the necessary arrangement with the Bank in
the first instance. He therefore moved that the
clause empowering the Treasury to remunerate be
left out.—Strangers were then ordered to withdraw,
and the Committee divided, when there appettred,

For retaining the clause - 76
For rejecting it - - 39
Majority - —37
On the re-admission of strangers to the gallery,
Mr. CALCRAFT was addressing the Committee.
He complained of the shortness of the time allowed
for dissenting to the measure. It would, in effect, be
no more than five days.
Mr. MABERLEY also thought the time too short.
He trusted it would be extended, for he was sure the
measure would give general satisfaction when consi-
dered out of doors.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
thought the time quite sufficient. A longer time was
allowed to trustees than to those who held the Stock
in their own right, and who might be supposed to
make up their minds more readily than trustees.
Mr. CALCRAFT disclaimed any wish to retard
the Bill; but he still hoped that further time would
be granted for the expression of dissent.
Mr. ELLICE said many questions would arise
out of the Bill which must be answered satisfactorily
before some of the holders could express their dis-
sent. For instance, if one of several trustees dis-
sented, and the rest assented, it might be proper to
consider the effect of this difference of opinion.
Mr. MONCK highly approved of the measure it-
self; but for that reason he wished that time should
be given for those who were interested in it to give
it due consideration.
Sir JOHN NEWPORT said the Public could not
be considered as having notice of the Bill until it had
passed. Nu one, he believed, could doubt its bene-
ficial operation; but that of itself ought to support
the application for time.
Mr. CALCRAFT said it was by no means impro-
bable that the Bill would not receive the Royal as-
sent until the 16th of this month, the day mentioned
for the first class to express their dissent. Unless time
were given, he feared the Public would, though er-
roneously, suspect that something was purposely hid.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said
the principal information which the holders of the
Stock could require, was that which appeared by
figures and sums, and these had already been pub-
lished in the Resolutions of the House.

Mr. ELLICE said, that any person interested in
the Stock might petition the other House, and pray
to be heard by Counsel against the measure; and this
alone might retard the course of the Bill. He feared
there would be some difficulty in carrying into effect
the proposed plan of paying off the dissenters in turn.
It was probable that the letters of dissent would be
very numerous in the last hour of the last day. There
might also be a difference in the value of the Stock,
occasioned by the dissent being early or late.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said,
the plan of paying off the dissenters had been clearly
laid down. The letters Mould be numbered, and the
writers would be paid off by their number.
Mr. ELLICE said, he had no wish to cavil at the
measure,' but really it appeared to him mote and
more impracticable after every explanation.
Mr. T. WILSON said, there would be much diffi-
culty as to the course to be taken-by executors,• who
were required to pay annuities secured upon the in-
tere4t arising from this Stuck. It might be a Ties;

. not hove a claim
's estate, to snake ip
EXCHEQUER said,
their money is this
knowledge of the
' the probable MINN

in the case he bad
mentioned by way of explanation, the legacy duty
would have been rid to Government on the full
amount of the annuity.
Mr. MABEHLEY thought mach confusion would
arise in consequence of the difficulty suggested by
the last speaker; for trustees would, if possible, shift
their Stock, in order to avoid responsibility.
Mr. MARTIN expressed his doubts as to the poisk
bility of carrying the MOURN into execution. He
had spoken to several Bankers, and persons connected
with the Bank of England, who had expressed theft
belief that it was impracticable. He wished to ask
the Right Hon. Gentleman whether he had any coma
munication with the Bank on the subject?
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said,
he had of course communicated with the Bank on
the subject. They thought it was,• in all respects,
practicable—The House then resumed, and the lie-
port was brought up, and ordered to be taken u.to
consideration on Thursday.
SUPPLY—ARMY ESTIMATES.
On the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the EX-
CHEQUER for going into a Committee of Supply,
and referring the Army Estimates to said Committee,
Mr. DENMAN wished, before the House should
Oo into Committee, to make an observation on the
rders of the Day. It was not unusual in that
House to put important Acts through second and
third readings about one •r two o'clock in the morn-
ing, when only a few Members were in the Hot .
That was the case on the morning of Saturday last,
when a very important Act went through its third
reading. He meant the Act for indemnifying per-
sons who took arms from persons in Ireland. The
Bill affected persons who had perhaps already urn-
menced proceedings against the Magistrates or o•rer
persons who had seized their arms, which they kept
for the defence of themselves or property. Ile mei ely
mentioned that, in order to draw the attention of
the House to another Bill, which stood among the
orders of that day, and was about paising into a
law. He meant the Smugglers' Commitment Bill.
He hoped the. Representatives for the maritime coun-
ties would look to that Bill. By that Bill, which
went farther than the 57th of the late King, the Ma-
gistrates might take up any unfortunate person sus-
pected of that illicit trading, and their decision was
final. He hoped the Bill would be ordered to be
printed-and postponed.
After a few words from Mr. WA RRE and Mr.
BENNET, the House resolved itself into a Committee
of Supply.
Lord PALMERSTON rose and said, it was his
intention to contrast the number and expense of the
Army for the present year, with the estimates of last
year, and to slew that there was a just reduction in
both for the present year. The number of men which
would be proposed for the current year was less by
12,304 than the number required for the last year.
There was also a reduction in the charge to the
amount of 537,449/. There were one or two mis-
prints in the estimates, whicra he would correct as he
went on. Thete were different modes for carrying
into effect those reductions • but the most advis !blo
was that by the reduction Of Companies, as it com-
bined the greatest saving of expense with other ad-
vantages. There were two entire regiments of ca-
valry to be reduced, and two troops in each remain-
ing regiment. The Noble Lord proceeded to state
the different reductions in the number of forces, as
well min the charges for their maintenance. The
charge for the Royal Military College was 13,662/. in
which there was a saving, as compared with the vote
of last year, of 3,2531. This decrease was attri-
butable, first to a reduction of the public officers,
by which 10001. was gained ; and, secondly, to an
increase in the number of students who paid con-
tributions. The charge for Army pay of General
Officers was 182,4251. 181.7d.—:ontrasted with tl e
vote of last year, there was in this vote an increase of
83561. This was occasioned by Government acting
upon an arrangement pressed upon them by the
House, of making a better provision for General Of-
ficers with Regimental Commissions. It was the in-
tention to allow to such General Officers the full pay
of their Commissions, though upon the half-pay list.
—The charge for Garrisons in Great Britain was
35,1531. less by 60901. than the vote oflast year.—
The charge for full pay to retired Officers was
145,2341. in which, as contrasted with the same vote
last year, there was an increase of 15,0001. This was
occasioned by the number of Officers transferred to
this list by the reduction of the Veteran Battalions.
It was, however, but a transfer of expense from one
list to another, for those Officers who were now
charged under the retired head, were charged last
year at their full pay. The next charge was the
Half-pay and Military Allowances, which this year
amounted to 870,8101. 18s. lid. There was also a
saving in this vote as contrasted with that of last year
of 51,0001. This was occasioned by several in the list
obtaining CommissiOns. The Officers were taken as
the vacancies occurred. The charge for Foreign
Half-pay was 114,870!. in which there was a dimi-
nution of 68951. contrasted with last year. This
saving was owing to some reductions which had
been made, and principally to the abolition of the
Agent for the Foreign Half-pay, the duties of which
were transferred to the Agent of the Home Half-pay.
-The charge for In-pensioners of Kilmainham anti
Chelsea Hospitals was 58,912/. 14s. 4d. in • which
there was a decrease of 68531. For Out-pensioners.
of the same, the charge was 1,181,1471. 9s. 9d. in
which there was an increase of 34,0001. owing to the
reductions in the Regiments of the Army. The Royal
Military Asylum was charged at 26,1491. 14s. tid.
which was 60001. less than list year. The charge for
Widows Pensions was 124,2761. 19s. 2d. in which
there was an increase of 35821. There was also an
increase in the Compassionate List for bounty war-
rants and pensions for wounds. The charge for super-
annuated allowances was 43,9584 in which there was
an increase of 37811. The charge for Exchequer
Fees was 33,0001. in which there was an increase of
30001. Of the Veteran Battalions ten had been re-
duced, and only three remained, but he could not
say when it was probable these could be reduced, on

towards Mr. Hunt, and perhaps
his confinement. He felt it doe
Sheriff of Somersetshire, to state

such an overcnarge posse
stances he hoped the Hou,
tern into consideration, ai
that the Petition be broug
Mr. GOULBURN said
s that the question was alrea
riushb
jGbeecotver.nm. eat.
P mightwthofhaathtttheelits ultimata
was not hi
rested the 1111,1111011 ell

.• • •
".! due practice ofibe Letlvat 14.1edend, as sum 'At BAMPON said that the Ilieble dot whither the *rnoitants wool(
of their present lalitiers • liktdre Wu. mom to •suppose that his object its 1140 s upon the residue of their teltlMOes
to
Hie gentles of the Eeclesi . • eleertherfr wiewith a eirew to senate darm. •na delcietiey. •
as e Mr.ELLICE *idled that Gdvetvelestashonld take Vi!se. 'Set he was trim= foe potions whe had an In. The CHANCELLOR, of the E
Ate subject into Consideration as sees esisossible. la the Navy Frye, per Cents. and it would be that all persons who had invested
ire in- T
con: hinGOULBURN said he we not-then prepared desirable, on their loeount, to know if Goveranteat Fend had done so with a full knot
t up. to state any specific measure, but so* that the sub- were possession of information to the area which and a presumed knowledge of tl
Df the Jett was under the consideration of Government. • beeetW, as tbe Stocks would be affected. thereby ? owege of disk doing so.
I- now Rif. r.ANGsTON said theattentionof Chverament, The Marquis of LONDONDERRY said he did Mr. T. WILSON- said, that i
- to the 111/mtioned by war of esplanade