Star.
London, England, 1809-03-10 00:00:00

d this kind with that g•entlernan,
inferred from this, that the r
nothing about it ? But if, as tl.
Gentleman said, the mill w'as
not this a precaution she woulc
course to ? If she said, the eye!
on the Duke of York, and the
upon her, was it not natural, !
every possible precaution, that
round to the Duke of York thrc
particularly after the injuncti
take care what hands she got it
her connection with Dowler, an
night with him, was it surpri:
deny it ? Whatever the Right H
may think of women of her unf
cry, they were not always who'
and delicacy. But was this n
most justifiable one he would
evidence, which was otherwise
was there she was said to have I
with Dowler to overthrow the
occasion, he would admit, wa!
it ; but the presumption was fr.(
the evidence, that she had fore
had weighed every step she h;
her evidence was unsupportet
her ; but the presumption w
when -it appeared that such int
HI: then adverted to the presur
the expensive establishment in
from the letters- on the table--,
ed, were much stronger than t
Right Hon. Gentleman, respec
conspiracy. It was proved ti:
114 d been connected with Mrs.
e;tablishment at Gloucester-pl
t time she lived privately,
observation, that none of the c
t i that period, they all arose s
mencement of the Gloucester-I
the great ezDence began, then
; Aud was there nu presumptiot
rers? Did they not prove that
mach, might have done a gri
true, that at the otlice evety 1
utmost regularity. Colonel
t transactions—he only at
o:* the office, and not to tit
vate concerns. These things
on, for they were not at all
f—gularity. Mr. Greenwcto,
Cs!arke with the eyes of, a
taings might ptoteed uni,now
no improper person in the a:
slppose so—and still ail these
forward. The regularity wi
actions were conducted at the
as a proof that no corrupt prat
in evidence that they were ni:
tection from that quarter. II
pose that the Duke of York
these transactions, they migh
lance of twenty Gordon% B
if this traffic had been carried'
of the Duke of York, it w
of wealth. No—for these ch
ter from coming to that e)
Gentleman said it was mirac
should have come to light, it
prevailed. Was it not more
of the King should have
which had been proved ?
that a man of the courage
Pourable Friend could have 1
charges forward—that he coy
ducing a reintilla of proof, th
selves should have existed ?
in the newspapers of persons
fling fault—but such fault c;
. crimes, and when the parti
suffered punishment for tilt
instance, accordingly, tliom
alone had -come to light, it v
sume that others remained b
nourable Gentleman had so
Duke of York could have cc
transactions ?" So he had
of them—but the damning I
Could the Duke of York h
sake of £2500, asked the R
man ?—No, he did net !!.<y
• was guilty of the basest ki
gaging in such practices wii
his own pocket, but he cu
Duke of York knew cf an
was it possible, observed
Gentleman, that the Dukc
conscious of guilt, could
rc:,aire, by refusing to pay
Why, if the Duke' of York
of having those foolisll
been exposed to the whole
perhaps give the work' to I
pronouncing upon what ris
In adverting to the pr,;
Gloucester Place, an 1-lono
v. ay had said, that it was
Princes of the blood ILyal
fit' itit the Archbishop cii
:rave persons who had lace
with, it was rather singu:
sit( uld not have learnt the
at least to have known
.the
thcitiOr nut much, passed 1
be that he did not kil<lNN' it
in a humbler situation; Ott
the carriages, and the pr,..
appeared at Gloucester
himself contributed but 11
establishment, some suspii
have arisen in his Royal
1-4 which all this was sui.
• was often in distress for
ponds and gewgaws in NI
delighted, were carried
Royal Highness, it appe
times with small sums wit
1p redeem her jewels.
uldlpe ignorant that tl
oiately at an end, unless
other solutes than himsi
traded to was, that she
wisons foe whom she si
0. 11.113YOUr. • for
,her
•be oval sitecalled h'