Star.
London, England, 1823-05-28 00:00:00

wile attempted to be detailed in the present
vras'deemed quite sufficient to propose,
cable measure. -for 'the consideration -
ships, and hoping a beneficial result
ties of the Established Church, as connected
welfare of the community at large.
Lord ELLENBOROUGH said, that he .n.
dispense with the consideration of the nullity clause cher-General had ally intention of bringing
till the Bill came into a Committee. At present we rent Debtors' Aet during this Rodeo?
the
iolligtog. It GENERAL, as we endenteed, replied
remained in some respects still under the old law,
and in other respects we were under the new law.— Mr. LITTLETON presented a Petition from the Mehl-
The predicted mischiefs of the latter were not percep- tants of the town of Derslem, in Ilniffordsliire, praying for an
tible in its operation ; and,:aherefore, he hoped that equalisation of the duties on asear.--Brosiiir up, read, and or-
dared us lie on the table.
'their Lordships would consider this circumstance in
legislating fur marriages. But the present was any RICOVDRY Of SMALL DEBtf.
Lord ALTHORP. brow ht u
thing except the Bill described by the Noble and Committee a ted to co gnsidep the Report of the
ppoinr the means of faci-
Learned Lord upon the Woolsack; it offered no full
and comprehensive law. for the regulation of mkr- !kiting the recovery of Small Debts. He said that 1
slags: • it was certainly not the measure which Wes he had been pressed by letters from all parts of thel
ezctid fmm •the Committee. It was hoped, for country,- to know what his intentions on this subject
instance, that all doubts whatsoever would have been were. He was not surprised at this general anxiety,
removed by a specific clause respecting the validity because, as the law now stoodi•no man could feel any
of 'English marriages in foreign countries. And here satisfaction in proceeding to recover debts under 15L.
their Lordships could not have forgotten a recent Pe- One ill ionsequence of the want of Courts for the tit.
tition from persons who belcinged to the Russia Com- rotary of small debts was, that a master might turn
pany, and who doubted if such marriages as had. away his servant without paying him his wages, and
been celebrated by the Chaplain to the Russian roc- the latter had no resource but in an action at law.-s-
-tory,. though according to the rites of the Church To remedy this evil the Legislature had at different.
o 1 England, were valid in law. Now, although a times authorised the establiihmeht of Courts of Re-
Noble and 'Learned Lord (Lord Stowell) had stated quest in different places, the Judges of which Courts
were at once Judges of the law and the-faet.• Ibis
most distinctly that such marriages, so solemnized,
course, although well suited to populous placess'it
had always been recognized in the taw Coin ts of
was evident could not be suited to agricultural dis-
this country, it was improper that such parties
tricts, were it would be difficult to find persons suited
* ahould • themselves be induced to . entertain such
to that office. The attention of the Committee had
dolihts ; and,. therefore, they'ought to' be explained
at once by some definitive clause, witheut the liarties been particularly turned to the expense of suits, and
they had taken such measures as would prevent the
being obliged to refer to the Law Courts here.—
He could also have wished that facilities had been expense of travelling. It was necessary also, that
some difference should be made betleen the consti-
accorded for the marriages of Protestant Dissenters
tution of
and Roman Catholics,- as it was held that all. mar- the County Court and the Court of Requests;
it was therefore intended to appoint a barrister, of a
ridges which happened to be solemnized by a Catho-
certain number of years standing, as assessor to the
-lic Clergyman in this country, if not re-solemnized
County Court, and that the mode of trial should be
according to the ritual of the Established Church,
were invalid. Another of the complaints was, that by Jury. Another point was, how that barrister should
be appointed ; and the present opinion of the Commit-
marriages the most in:essuous, shameful, and urns- ,tat lie should be appointed by the Lord
at rural; were tolerated i i certain classes; this was an 'tee was,
Lieutenant of the County, upon whom the choice of
intolerable anomaly in the Marriage Law, retained ,
in the Bill before their. Lordships, and against Which the County officers generally• fell. The subject of
salary was another cousideration ; and to prevent an
'no security wits offered. With respect to the clause
improper bias on the part of the assessor, it was pro-
protective of the rig Las of parents and guardians to
posed to pay him a fixed salary from the county rates.
• norm! the marriages made under age, he saw no te•
curity in it, as marriages by, banns remained on the these were the chief points to which lie wished to draw
the attention of the House. It was however his iii-
footing of seventy years past. Whenever a Youth
tention, ittorder to make creditors vigilant in looking
wished his marriage to be valid, he would marry by
after their debts, that the Statute of Limitations should
banns, and conceal it from .his parents or guardians
be in force in these Courts, and that the time limited.
till, he bad mastered the ag,e of twenty-one. When a
should be two years. He was *seine that as this re:
marriage was intended to be validly good, it could
rust be nullified by the Bill ; but in cases where men gulation would be entirely new, there would be some
wished to betray thefairer, though weaker sex, under complaints made against it; but its operation would
the semblance of marriage, the measure would, if only be to oblige creditors to prosecute their debtors,
whom they could trust, iii a less time than two years.
passed; be found to operate in a manner not appre-
I here was also
another complaint that would be
headed he Many of those• Noble Lords who supported
• it. Husbands might carry off wives into foreign made, and it was this.—that by the iasiitution of these
Courts considerable business would be takers out of the
parts, and we
enabled to divorce them altogether.
li4 wished to include the generous rights of wives; , Courts of Westminster 11411, and that coMpensation
but if these were to be dishonoured and disgraced in
•might be required. Ile. was deeidesiky -otrpiniqn,*
their own esteem, and driven back upon a shelterless ' thaw no compensation ought to he allowed, -because
• World,' their Lordships were entertaining a -measure, thought that by the presents ostern i cpreiderte.
which degraded • the weaker party—which fell only'l ble class of persons Were denied)uitke i. and tie did
on woman. It was, in effect, just that measure most :pot think that any one cotitl have a Vested interest
calculated to operate as a premium on seduction, and ; ur the denial of justice; . To compensation, therefore,
• rather than have expected it from the united labours ! he was a decided enemylbist he niiglirlie -Wee:finis
of• Right Reverend Prelates and Noble and Learned • it, and he did- not therefore' bind' !Anise], fo•Oir'O'OP
Lords; he might have viewed it as miginating with the Bill if compensation Were awarded. He had
a patty of young dissolute taverners, who were pro- taken- this 'opportunity Of briefly• expressing hit
siding for the marriage of sonie*Don Jnan. sentiments, because be was aware be should not have
. • , .. ,: _
- The .Archbishop of CANTERBURY here into- -an opportunity oe.going- to roe*
mated. his desire Unit- the Bill should stand corn- ! Bill. It was his intention tobruig in the 8i11,..t0 diet',
- mitted WV Tuisday west. - 1 its first reading, imithendeferics further preset-460a
Lord ELLENBOROUUM had no dilation to until the next Se,sinti.
this arrangerent. ' • .. , . .• . . 1 Mr. SCARLETT said, that at present he felt n*
- The Earl of WESTMORELAND took objections 'objection to the provisions of the Dill, as itatediii,
to the Bill, as shaking the security of property, and . his Hon. Friend; for he conceived that it would be'
altering the lase of England: • . of gr:at public benefit.- The Noble Lord bad done
'The Bishop of CHESTER was adverse from the him the honour to state to hint the general principle
nullity clause, respecting the marriages of minors, of the Bill, anti he thoughtit a'very woad one;
.in the proposed Bill. This prevision was contrary ctoraisisartow LAWS. '* - • • • .
both to the expressed and written Word of •Goo, Mr. LITTLETON presented a 'Petition froth the
which said.' 44 Whom Goo bath :joined together, let Iron Manufacuireia of-Dudley, in the counties Ofhit.tf-
no man Separate." For•this Cause a man was to leave . ford and Worcester; against the Bill for regulating
his father and mother, and cleave unto his wife; and differences between Mailer and Servant. He Was will
.
fro separation, or bill of divorce, was, under the disc ing to give credit to the IlOnourable Member Mr.
pensation of Christianity, to be allowed, except for P. Moore) for the motives ninth had induced him to
adultery. Such was the law of CHRIST. But what, bring forward bit Bill ; but lie (Mr.. Littletori) thought
• in effect, did the present Bill say ? - Get married by it likely to be productive of many inconveniences.
banns, live together for a years then dishonour and He would therefore recom mend the Honourable Mem
desert the partner Of your bosom, and bastardize her her to withdraskrhis Bill until the next Session, and
infant child. Were such sentiment it 'for a Chris- take the opinion of every class-upon it. If the Ho-
tian's Creed? Could such-opinions be' enacted by a nourable Member would not listen to this suggestitin,
Christian Senate? * He still trusted that such conclu- he (Mr. Littleton) should feel it his duty, Sehest *Or
;Motif would never be affirnied by their Lordships, second reading was proposed, to move its sec .• '.
The Bishop of KILDA It E•shought that the argu- reading that day six months. . . . .
meut was lost sight of. The question was respecting Mr. P. MOORE-said that he was thaiiiitui roe
all marriages, if persons .had contracted what from Honourable Member for the objection which belied
the beginning was-voidable
.by law. • , stated, because his object' was to receive inforasillou
Lord .ELLENBODOUGH: said, that he 'would from every quarter. But -these objections Were
rather have the opinion of some Noble and I earned brought forward by the manufacturers, who were •
Lord upon this subject than - the argumer is of some persons whom his measure would of act. The Ho,
Eight Reeirielatesi if the latter were fOunded on notirable Member concluded at some length in fa.
Ecclesiastical Laws which, too often, was neither the Tour of the Bill. He had taken it up because no qua
law if GOD nor man. sow, in the present Bill, ws else had, and lie hoped that, after all thetroublethat
ifistaltion was attempted to be dawn respecting had been expended upon in it would not befall".
what marriages were immoral end what were not. Alr.S. WORTLEY thought the subject rret-f • 1
The LORD CHANCELLOR was persuaded that worthy 9f attention. His own experience lisid 'cioki
their Lordships must have a good deal more both of vinced him that all Acts of Combination were useless
the Law of the Land and the Scripture Law, before and .that their only effect was td promouramet‘ii
they could dispose with safety of the Bill. He was, workmen a desire to combine. With respect!, this
therefore, for proceeding to a Committee on the Bill. present Bill, he should have no'objeetion to'agrePia'
The question was put and agreed to, and the Bill it if it only went to repeal Former Acts; but I,W,klso
ordered to be comuutted for Tuesday ' neat.—Ad- nourable Member proceeded to intioduce•iniioneer
jourued till to-morrow.. • •
.*, ' regulations which required attention. Mil bops/
HOUSE OF CoStiEbES. • therefore that the Bill *OW not be pressed.
The Sesame took the Mar at GOD reelect. ' * Lord STANLEY would prefershatiftl-Bal shoe
Sir IL KNATCNBULL proseeted a Padden from several be sent to a Committee up stairs, and thoste walla
parishes is lietit,raylng lot a reduction babe Doty as Cosh.— •
udered, and then allowed to stand over until the
Brought op, reed, rrod ordered to lie an the table, sod be primed.
A Maims, whose Mtn we did ant !mow, presorted a.retitiOn Session, that it might in the interim be well-eitt
from certain Linen Manufacturers of the City Of Aberdeen, stood in the manufacturing world.' He watglisi
praying for a total remission attire Duties en Sulphur.—Bessielbr the subject of payment of wages formed -melba
up, read, and orderld ti lie as the table. • of the present Bill. ' •
Tbs' sone .Hen.ibliosess preisated.a)Petition frees *slaw
. plsoe.nrayleg toe an *iriesen
. attic Lieu now* the r. Mr. HUSILISSQN said, that be era -bogus' in
ins a Lifts.-...8r0 np, read, add ordered to Ifs ea the . tice IP say, that the Honottrabla hieniheef the Caries-
A Message from -the Lords mummies! dam their Lordships try had been quite consistent in the .e.ollll* which
bad agreed to several private MU. without easeadassati. had announces' at the beginning of'the ilassies,
Mr. li'l ill DSAY preteens! a retake front . she lttasieficte-
rel..
of ea.ar
mina
the Paddenheeet
Lold-iiioo:4 Famed fora a town hi the ,to a Committee up stein. He thought the Bill con-

- 7m`-

-~

;.~

,

.~.

Lam—There were several examinatioes trim
se Mere, after being sworn b the Magistrate... 1
-.61 recollect their belegletileled ash Ingotkvitt. •
Mittel was made I believe the emodintlike were before the Ma.
gistrates ; though, from the answers,* ippeared as iftbepseeet
not. According to the best of my reionection, I flikelfatiltro
Major Ike what was my opinion, sod that was to commit fee
ainspitall to murder. In ail eases of examination the
trams were not preeent,.butgenerally, and seheti MI Were.
to gado the Law Mamas to their course, but
loterferesteem thelsart Of the Miebtratge• .i* stbe e***, Sr by
Mr. Gobbet an the informations were seen by mim IMO leek
k w s not ties mein that of Meier ger, who weemsmerahle fa
k i -V he did wrong, it was without sty direction front me.
By Mr. Ileteov.—Major Set never at any time orged to hid'
Sit be could not mote* tin the capital Amee. Graham
Meemitted in Demother, and 1 have do distinct reelliketion On
'stroke to him other than in staring it to be the opinion of the
Law Officers of the Crown that these proms ought to be rapt.
tally committed. Major Sire heard our opinions on the tater.
day evening, and on the next Monday the commitiak were caste
Ism. TM, Law Officers had coastiked as to the "Woe togs
liven. but. I eatinmpartieulaely say why is Major Sirr, axdpt
'because of his residence at the thole. Th• Magistrates spy
rto the Governtnent upon this subject. The loformationstabel
before the Magistrates- went laid before the Law Officers. These
twee no bolding back any examination from the Magistrates
which were quite aceeseible to Major Sire and every ocher Ma,
&trate, and I thought he would have seen them all before lit
signed any efonmittel. Our opinion to the Magistrates watilhic
there was evidence of the c Taal offence, end that'tbey oughts,
be centmitted for that ofibnce. No direction, nor lattruction,
other dam opinion. were even to the Magistrates. •
By Mr. IL o. ..—Sonie of the Magietratei altd Path
hold their places at the pleasure of the Crown—Mr. Gobbet*
one of those Magistrates—Major•Skr bolds a patent place?—t
believe not. Ey the' Dublin Police Act there are Civic and
Crown Magistraert, the former paid by the City, and he Wow
by.the Deaeary. d believe Majos flier of the latter 'clam
By Dr. Lourinsmos.—The examination lasted six or scree
days, and the. Magistrates, or.some one or them, was present?
By Sit J. Newmaa—Couuty ?Jag's:rates applied to Inc as to
phut they shduld do In cases of this nature, and I declined
giving any :opinitits. •
Was rise eon'rary the practice of your predecessosei—l Les
rather not *newer that alusction if my lion. Friend will allow me.
- Mr. GOULl3tlt-N begged to correct the answer
.•
given by the Attorney-Genes al, as to the 11,tgistrates
being removable by the Crown; the fact was °therein.
By Mr. ban (Deblin).—After the Bills were ignored: e. •
parties were held to bail2—Yes ; ma by me, but by the Cesett.-
Win the Attorney-General say it is in his power to hold a pey-
son to kaki consequence.of an eziBrczo7—That Is a patios
of law, which I do not feel called upon to ansteer.
Mr. CALCRAFT -now wished to ask the Ilon.
' Gentleman. who conducted this case, whether he had
any more evidence tio 41.61. ; for it was his intention
to move the 'dissolutiOn •Orthe Committee?
ColOnel BARRY said, he certainly had intended
to examine another witness who had not yet arrived;
he, however,, felt the inconvenience to which this in.
qiiiry put the House, and he could not shin his eyes
against the distaste which was shewn to continue it.
lie had, therefore, no objection to rest the Sheriff's
case here, and to give over consuming the time of the
Hottsei.ln a way which did not seem very wider.
tory to the ends of justice. He should not, therefore,
ivy oat the• motion for the Hon. Chairman discontiiiin
ing the parallel rho ition which hehad held so long. •
-Mr..DENMAN..—I. cannot stiffer this inquiry 'to
close here, under an imputation that we are India,.
two J..-- A.. 44. • • -•
• S
.O.CII .60 go 160 Liter wpm it it ono improner.die
of our time to be employed in such a way, forl lardy
no duty of this House more sacred or isbporlant that
watching over and protecting the administration of
justicii=(ilear).—Let not the Right Honourable CA-
Almon therefore say, that it is to spare the timed
the House that he gives over; but if he will stop here,
let it be placed to the account of his best discretion
for the incased party, and not in' the way of a con.
-promise of an inconvenience—(Hear).—List night I
Wind with some turPrise that the inquiry was come
to .1 elow, because one class of witnesses had-cones.
dieted. hat another advanced; hut that issbe wry
time that the judicial power begins—when there is
roan to feral a judgment from the collision of en-
dews. Let it be distinctly understood, then, tint
_the case is closed, as it was intended, to follow it in
by proposing Resolutions. For-I repeat, that we eotit!
not be better employed than in mach an inquiry..
though itshonld prolong the Session another yak
Mr. CALCRAFT then moved-66 That the ICIOIPA
man do leers the Chair, and report the evidence to
the noise OiNch was agreed to. The Homeroom!.
The CLIAIRMAN then leftithe chair, and reported
. •
sF.t. e 4104 *mold not arced ttyking 040P"'
jioligokitis what ho belisved to be the roe
Ape ;his thanks to the ifon..Baronet for die
able ' impartial manner in whiclibe dikaargeilfe
duties of chairmen in the tate inquiry-7(Heett...
Mr. WYNN moved that the Minutes of She err
dente be laid' before the House.-4greed
It wispliltewise ordered that the witnesses shag
be discharged from funber.,atteidance..
ions? TlmliaNcT (1111L3VD).
Mr. DALY moved that She Joint TooluisTP1b
recortuditted.
Mr. R. MARTIN the , op the
Bay
itin, •
Atilt would have the tof disfranchising .
lilliffholicu •He thought, st leaf, that the people el,
Ireland :healable allowed time to express their era'
Woes on thespropriety of the mean*
psis l- TRENCH said, be could not agree is del
AO:don urged -by'ihe Membilr for Galway. 'The
Amiss which Ibis Bill toisix to remove Was ims of a
inset unreasosablo-iroloso. In his opinion tbs
did. not go far enough.,
Sir J.-NEWPORT said he would 'recitalist!!
&ie his dippers to any measure which woold.ley
vent that minute sabdivisioo of lands which 'wee*
great curses of the.people.peopleof Ireland. The hehilig,
the.rtople led.to.this abuse. It was the castoni-thel
to divide (*Plum). mom • the younger Inef 11:theo"
• Vali:4l
• id

salt it pining the BM would create some appre-
hension in the monufacturing districts, if they con-.
ceived, as they might, that Government countenanc
the proposed Measure.
Mr. DUGDALE said, that the manufacturing dis--
trict with which he was most acquainted viewed with
very considerable apprehension the proposed measure.
The Bill was brought up, and on moving that it.
should be read,
, Mr. P. MOORE remarked, that he had no wish to
suppress the information upon which his Bill was
fdunded, and he had no objection to allow the Bill to
stand over till the next Session ; but he hoped he
should be permitted to consult the country Gentlemen
now in town, and ascertain their opinions upon the
propriety of taking the second reading to-morrow.
Mr:PHILLIPS thought it would be well to gt
rid of the present bill, but they should take care thin
they did not add to instead of diminish the diet-;
culties of that Bill by the present measure.
The Petition was read, ordered to lie on the table,
and to be printed.
ADMIRALTY 01PIPICiS 124-11111INO GARD'S&
Mr. BROUGHAM wished to ask a question re-
specting the houses in Spring gardens: He wished
to knew whether the Treasury had received an esti-
mate of the five thousand pounds to be laid out in
rebuilding certain houses situated there, and alio
whether them wasany estimate of the value of the
buildings proposed to be removed ?
The SEQRETiIitY of the TREASURY replied,
that the estimate was not then in,his possession, but
he could very soon obtain.it.
Mr. BROUGH AM.—Then perhaps, Sir, the Hon.
Gentleman will have the goodness to give me that in-
formation to-morrow; and he may at the same time,
,perhaps, be enabled to inform me whether there are
' any offices unoccupied in the Admiralty adapted
to residecce ?

-• " . Cononens.
Sir It. SHAW presented a Petiticd from certain
Coroners in Ireland, complaining of the present ad-
ministration of the law by the Sheriffs of Ireland, and
praying for the repeal of the Bill recently passed
under the auspices of the Hon: Member for Galway
(Mr. Martin). '
Mr. S. RICE supper:eating plrestrof the Petition.
The Public, he•said,had elPerillehddlesueh loss from
the present MIL:. . . _.. ::..:_
Mr. R. MARTIN esidcit,was nevi -estraordinarY to
hear that evijs had resultc.3 from a measurealmilar to
that which in England was found so adrieteseons-
Sir „I. NEW PO la cootended that tbelaet had been
groisly abused by'the Under -Sheriffs; and the suitor
had formerly his second remedy, and that no incon-
siderable relief, of applying to the Coroner, .It was
proverbial in Ireland that the *King's writ did not run
to the county of.Galway—(A lanes}
Mr. MARTIN explained, that as the .epunty of.
Galway hid been particularlyalluded to be vanstbe
rrinititil to says that. since the pwire of Isis Dill tie!
county he represented had every -reason to iejoice in
it Measure which destroyed the truth of the proverb.
-,..7*Mr. •GOULBURN did not see why. the. system
.which worked so well in England should net be found
esinagy snieeetrilli Ireland.
• Mr: DALY 'duppiwted the alteration seal& tad
beers mide.--;The Petition was thent eitliatid imblifil
to lie on the. table. .. • - - i
..' . ' .
•
• . • SIR THOMAS MAITLAND. ._ ~F., qf,
Mr. NUME was desirous bf•necertaining fresh thit
4elenial Secretary whethitO - • was the antenttOn of
-Qtroannient to recall ft*. ' rstsperiuttatidence of tie
iliedan Islands Sir Tinsman Maitland: the Governer P
Mr. WILf4IOT-HORTOI4 -replied, that no such
intention existed ; and he only hoped: that the Il&
neurahle Gentleman would fureish hint With the spe-
cific charges upon which he meant to' est his mgdoo
before he brought it forward. 1,.
- . R&LO DR sr.. • •
Mr. LEONARD rose to more. for leave to bring sin
a Bill to amend the laws relating to the interment and-
s:oo4ns of ,ersons committing/We d, se. By the.
custom of this'country, the bodatiflierwissfriedeg
were subjected, *' by lair;-biteby a barbarous peas..
tice, to certain indignities; and by law, indeed, they.
were deprived of •tite risbts• of. christian burial. . By.
the Casmi.Law there were three partiesuriginelly tin-
pliveti-orChristinn boxial: first, those Who committed
„Ale de se; secOsidly,tfibse whihadbeenationstnu-
uitatedi and ,the third class cousisted• of ..thnsti whO
net -been baptised, . Now he had no intention ef
@loving for the repeal of that part of the law which
Ankle the crime Off* de se so censurable as• that its.
• omission should tieprive the individual of Chris-
dun burial; but he was merely desirous of repealing.
that barbaroui customs • which subjected the body. 6
further degradation.--Leave was giren to bring in R.
Bill accordingly. . . ..
tIMPS'iIIatIAXCE OP THE °TRICE OF LORD LIRI/711.
• NANT IN IRRLAND. , v
i:*lift HIFME route bring forward his Motion u • •
OM, subject; kart, Mt the suggestion of Mr: &emery
Piet, oesseented•topostpone it for the present. ,
ADKINISTRATIOW OF JOBVICII IR srw amnia 111411411.
Mi. WILMOTAORtON said, , that he - •shouldi
merely move for leave to bring in a BUN. the:
ter Administration ' cif Jostle* in Nisi South W
The Bill, When printed, would be cineulated;aad • •
'clebatc could be taken on the seCondreading.-=.Leave
~,...cordingly, given.
• : enucto,- LAWS.

discretipn, and tote 1:e his tang •et . t,— rowel), 'wowed ;keitinwetobit opinion. a :
Attornty-Goostalibinh it Wag& b. M,a y 4
act 7•••Conalitly not.
Misr differ with the Law Mete at thitinicnvit
I heard. I trot heard hint tay so at et .

• Me.
.P]

thry

. • -

-----'~:"Z' • West Riding of Yorkshire, cones:fins yr general igrieskural •• • : 'on: too minute Ur)* •. eke 1._:.111
mesent Bill. • • 411 dlseretil
read. ssid red Mir on the tall& ',Di • • • w veneers we
Lanz; he
••I Sr 11.,wva a .Slititiot from thlispaß.o ••, • Sesotho Ann
ose• sofas praolibth.
wade. ant ; " ' *tests so to act
of their Lordv— nir; RR *memo& a from on !madams; ble M • lir • • •' • ita Stgioreti
to the solemni- *last war% C ot Requesto.PlL Wit which he ha • , , . ?--Not that
Alta NT_ p a Peel** From d idea
netted witkahe 'lO%, iV
- fcittlittthe commit* Hem ikus
Vike rgOtless, oldie solstondvet or • • 'By cappd a
Guild of igefekints pubis, pad ray* for tiviirT! Kink for Coventry would not press his ion by the./Aw
that he .shottitl_ rer-Aitoirt ' the prevent Session. He was sure that the re- acot nwancet tt
le nullity clause eitor-Genendhad any intention of btipgine forward die soli of prating the Bin would create some appre- !tttalwuffds

...-- _ _
new •;, _ ,1011041 NA I. Ii.AWS. ' to divido AC lditsl . moon • the Imager vatasee,-
wA Mr. PEEL, ama to *rodeo, certain Bills, to which ,the.fasmVi gt .aa Avant, that riE lasOr ttir
"4"-- tai a former nighthe hod alluded, connected with the TrOM ... ~ .
~, la the 'I/tidier- d; VI& set list"
•. .
i
maid meal *Ennui Criminal Laws. The other .capital cpiodlo ;b:. Vithresiaeirdn'it. •s•; .
cois. isifamiel that of slestroiing hop- 'les, shoal& bitrea-, . Ir. U WitsillatlVAr sitinst the BM.-
,i-
-ilecedhableio transport* .vo sizioViiven, .. 8'.... . 'lf - . IPII-: di
ow. to bring in Bills,: in order to retry
..,,. , .--- . Ai. eir4) iitiiihrthe44: at die sgto
oiat changes into law, • •• - --1.-; ,:fh-.‘ beiliii ;can't .In freliad; and denied that
ware • . alttlFr i'T DialalL al 'i_
_, ~ . ' ihe effesta(disfranchislag the Roman Catill.
n.
Ier.CALCR' .moved the Order ordlivief ' ' C. C. HUTCHINSON •an be 'was as MVO
I pi. -me*, the into the seniert of the . ~ Rkyjett 5n eselpi illetitieits votes. Bet be f
win: cf ahlwr•-.4lir ILHancat is dse:Ohair, • , ~ , 1, : 4 .14r!ca.auttilli •:iriii; ' • `.tt"linic abs '
bhe Mr. cAugArr called the Atteroey4eeoiral fee Iresid. iiiiirmci!lie. fie' .t- it
k 4 **rude& 0 she law 011ooto to Oral Motiotoriato ON ibrot t iti 'tat; sded itiet . SRL "lb .
viz. weewaw)--irot that 4 -mew. • -• • , • , 1 , `,.... u.!,,, e..1.....44 1,....,k.
..
as it • Did they so order Major Sirr in the ewe 4 rintakt-740 ; isq.-- ------ • further -
con. they advised, but did net order. The Dligistrate *odd nor- t' He warned his Lion. Friend who is . ...