Star.
London, England, 1809-02-14 00:00:00

:enarit-Colonelcy was obtained ? A. No.—,
!as done in consequence of the application
irke ?A. Nothing at all.—Q. Did the bu-
oti, or did it die au ay ? A. On the night
in which I wrote to Mrs. Clarke, I received
Mrs. Clarke, inciosing Major Shaw's se.
he money, and stating that Col. Shaw's
it could not take place, and that she was
ould not do any thing fer him. Mrs.
for me to describe the person of Major
state his interest, without which she could
n the matter to his Royal Highness. I
describe his person, as I had never seen
is interest appeared satisfactory, and Mrs.
ommended that be should obtain tWO
we of absence through some General officer,
ich period she should use her influence with
Highness to accomplish the purpose with-
ming the cause.
, this, you' had your interview with Colonel
A. Yes.--Q. For what purpose ?A. It
lel Shaw that sought it.—A. Did you relate
Shaw what passed between you and Mrs.
A. I don't think I did.—Q. Did the busi-
off and die away ? A. I know of no cir.
respecting that, except the note sent to me
you recollect having spoken
trait Colonel Shaw had broken kis word
A. Certainly he did break his word with
,rd to his telling Mrs. Clarke that Mr. Do.
:w of the circumstance.—Q. Did you ever
of ]l;.i having broken his word with you be-
a..d not make you a present ? A. Never.
did make me a present.—Q. What pre.
When I sent him his papers, he sent me
intents, saying he was sorry Iliad so much
Lad inclosed me ten nounds.—Do you know
!and application on the part of Colonel Shaw
larke ? A. Certainly not.—A. Do you re-
Le date of the transact4on we have been
of ? 4. The first time I saw Mrs. Clarke
camber, 1 80.1..--Q. Do you recollect any
lon you had with Mr. Donovan upon the
A. I cannot recollect. I have been in the
visiting at Mr. Donovan's, and have seen
iuently. But as to the conversation that
cannot say.---Q. What was the date of the
? I!. It was, I believe, from December
April 1605, as nearly as I can guess:—
: you in the habit of corresponding with
Shaw ? A. I must have written lettefs to
!uently, as the business continued for a long
ind he was uneasy and anxious to get rid of
—Q. Have you any of Colonel Shaw's let-
returned the whole of his letters to Mr. Do-
two or three days after he saw Mrs. ClarV;.—
tra know any thing further of the transaction
Colonel Shaw and Mrs. Clarke? A. I do not.
DENNIS BROWN E.-••Q. Do you know per-
or by repute, the Miss Taylor who appeared
ness at the Bar of this House ? I have seen
iylor. She came to my house with her brother,
Taylor.--Q. What do you know of the cha-
ir repute of Miss Taylor ? A. It is hard to,
orn hearsay. Of my own knowledge, nothing.
An what passed between you and Mrs. Clarke:
believe, that any subsequent transaction took
:tween Colonel Shaw and Mrs. Clarke.
sort conversation took place on the propriety ofl
cession, but the witness answered,
Jo not believe Mrs. Clarke ever heard of
S:taw afterwards.—Q. Did you ever tell any
, and, if so, when, that Miss Taylor was a
of bad repute ? A. I certainly did say that I
turned Miss Taylor's visit, because I had
,ometbing unpleasant.—Q. What unpleasant
::ance was it that prevented you from return-
Taylor's visit? A. It was hearsay, and I
:oppose I am obliged to report what I have not

FULLER rose to put a question to the wit-
at she was ordered to withdraw, on the ground
A• question ought not to be pressed.
L:FTORNEY GENERAL thought that an
cation to general reputation was allowable.
BARHAM thought the question wholly irre-
, and said that it was idle to enquire from a
who was in the habit of visiting Mrs. Clarke,
Lsor, for not visiting Miss Taylor.
FULLER contended that the witness was the
:.:male witness that had been examined at the
He insisted that she should be called Lack, in
that he should ask her whether if she had a fe-
hild she would intrust her to Miss Taylor's care ?
. BATHURST thought the question wholly
;41t, and added, that the sense of the Commit-
.P.ned to be against pressing it.
. LOFTUS stated, that the best course
ne to put a direct question to the witness, whe.-
.1 witness, from her knowledge of Miss Taylor,
.ve credit to her testimony?
:;.nnc further conversation, the witness was
; bat the quesLion proposed -by General
was over-ruled.
(By Mr. DENNIS BROWNE.) Can witnes4, from
.ca knowledge, say that the evidence of Miss
ris not to be believed ? A. I declare, f can.
see .:ow I can answer such a question as that :
merely a matter of opinion. I cannot.
(By Sir JAMES GRAHANL)Where does witness
• A
. At No. 29, Villers-street. Where did
::e before she came there ? A. 111 South Mol.'
'::tet•—(2. How long did she live there ? A. I
tell.—Q. Can't tell how long she lived in a
stlect ! Where did :.he live before
she
••. to live in South Moiton.strec ? A. In Panton-
Ire, where I lived three Fears and a hall.—Q.
witness quit pantoll-square A. In 1505.
ILA the live there when silt used to visit Mrs.
irked A. I was not in the habit of 1. siting Mrs.
irk, I to her on busincs;.—Q. Has witness
:ea ail the business she transacted. v:i..11 Mrs. Ciarkc ?
• The lousiness I had with Mrs. Clarke was for
,a;zissions, and related to genllimen whose names
;lever been mentioned, and for whom she never
, •
4".; tO!ng..--(2. State the names of those per-
A. There never was any thing done for them;
!•arnes were entrusted to me, and I think it would
right to state them.
I.ie witness was ordered to withdraw, upon Mr.
objecting to the question. A discussion of
kngth took place, and it was decided that the
• should he put in anoth, r shape.
Did you ever send the names of any persons
v:ere desirous of obtaining promotion to Mrs.
•uke A. I did not send ; I brought them.—Q. fte-

collect yourself, and statsobsir tuunes.--46 It is a
from want -of memory, or disrespect to I
House, that I decline to doses

Mr. WHARTON—It is the sense of the CoMmitz
tee that the witness should answer the question ex-.
plicitly and pr3mptly.
Q. Endeavour to recollect as many names as you
can ? A. It would be very dishonourable in me to
bring forward the names of persousfor whom nothing
has been done.

Mr. WHARTON—I wish again to remind the
witness, that the Committee has decided that the ques-.
tion must be answered, and that this House has the
power of inflicting a heavy punishment on her if she
declines to do so.

By the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER.
Q. Had witness the authority of these persons to
mention their names to Mrs. Clarke? A. I can't re-,
collect that I had.—Q. Did she ever send the names
of any persons to Mrs. Clarke, without their autho-
rity ? A. Indeed my memory does not hold out.
Witness ordered to withdraw.
Mr. Secretary CANNING suggested, that the ques-
tion may be so framed, as to bring out the fact with-
out disclosing the names of the persons. It was pos-
sible the witness might have been applied to as a
broker, without reference to either I.ln. Clarke or the
Duke of York. _ .

Sir G. WA RRENDER said, it appeared, that the
witness was one of Donovan's agents ; and the Com-
mittee would recollect, that it was stated, by a former
evidence, that he had given in a long list of persons
who were candidates for promotion to Mrs. Clarke.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
agreed, that if it could be proved the names had been
submitted to the Duke of York, it would be proper
to inquire into the circumstance.
Mr. HUSKISSON observed, that previous to the
Duke of York's le:ter, nothing was more common
than for Officers to purchase and exchange commis-
sions through the medium of brokers.
General FITZPATRICK confirmed this state-
ment, and said, a clause was introduced in the Mu-
tiny Bill, for the special purpose of putting an end to
such practices..
General STEWART said, it would be wry un-
fair to the army, to have the names of Officers men-
tioned, by persons without character, and particu-
larly as they would have no opportunity of contradic-
ting4em.
NS WHITBREAD said, there was one way of
clearing their characters, as General Clavering had
proved.
General MATHEW observed, that there was
hardly an Officer in the Army, previous to 1805, who'
had not been guilty of this practice.
Mr. SPENCER STANHOPE objected to the
question. It must necessarily implicate so many per-
sons, that the Committee would not be able t© finish
the inquiry in the course of the Session.
General MATHEW moved, that the sense of the
Committee be taken on the question.
After some further discussion, the motion was with-
drawn, and the witness being called in,
Mr. WHARTON again admonished her to an-
swer the question, under pain of the displeasure of
the Committee.
(Question repeated by Sir J. GRAHAm.) A. I will
answer it out of respect for the power of the House,
and not through fear. One Johnson. and one Wil-
liamson.—Q. Does witness recollect any other names?
A. I do not recollect any other.—Q. She must en-
deavour to recollect ? A. I cannot recollect any
other.—Q. Did you deliver in at any time, a list of
other names ? A. I did, but cannot recollect them.
—Q. State the Christian names of the names you
hive mentioned. A. One was George, and William
the other.—Q. Where do they live-? A. I cannot
tell.—Q. Cannot tell where persons, wlit,ni she has
stated to be acquaintances, live ? A. No ; it is up-
wards of three years ago since that transaction took
place.—Q. Is witness a married woman ?A. No.
I have been a widow nearly six years.—Q. How long
did she live in South Molton-street ? . A. About a
year and a half.
Q. (By Lord PALMERSTONE.) Does witness know
of any application to obtain leave of absence having
been made to. Mrs. Clarke ? A. No : Mrs. Clarke
told me she could not obtain leave of absence for an
Officer. She desired me to write to Major Shaw, to ;
obtain leave of absence for two months, and that
that would be sufficient time to forward his application.
Q. (By Lord MILToN.) What answer did Mrs.
Clarke give the witness, when she carried to her the
two names she mentioned ? A. She said she would
try, but she must be very careful that no suspicion
arose that it was a money transaction, as that would
ruin her.—Q. Did Mrs. Clarke express any desire
that it should be kept secret from the Duke of York ?1
A. She certainly did.
Q. (By Lord FOLKSTONE.) The witness lived in
V illiel'6-street ; did she not ?A. Yes.---Q. had she
a house there, or did she live in lodgings ? A. In
lodgings.,-Q. What was the name of the person to
whom the 1., use belonged ? A. Adair.-.-Q. ‘Vere
there ::ny otl er lodgers besides herself? A. She be-
lieved there were.---Q. Is Adair a man or a woman ?
A. A wouid.n.---Q. How long had she known Dono-
van A. SW.; believed eighteen years.— Q. When
did she last see Donovan ? A. This moment.—Q.
When had she last seen him before she came to the
House ? Vesterday.--.Q. Was she in the habit of ,
constantly seeing Donovan ? A. Yes.
Q. Had she any knowledge of the transaction in ,
which Dont,van had been engaged in respect of the
traffic for appointments ? A. She knew of none ex-
cept that of Colonel Shaw, in which she herself had
been engaged.—Q. Was that the only transaction of
this nature of which she had any knowledge ? A.
She did not recollect any other whatever.—Q. Had 1
Donovan any concern in the list of names which she
carried to Mrs. Clarke ?A. No.—Q. Did Donovan at
that time carry on any traffic of that sort ? A. She
knew of none of his transactions in that way, except
that in which she herself had been engaged.—Q.
When the witness went to Mrs. Clarke, did she go
of her own accord, or had she been sent by Donovan ?
A. She went of her own accord, without any intro-
duction whatever, and Mr. Donovan never knew that
she had gone to Mrs. Clarke's till some months after.
.--Q. When was this ? A. In December 1805, she
believed.—Q. Was Donovan acquainted with Mrs.
Clarke at that time ? A. She thought lie was not.—
.Q. Was the witness at Mrs. Clarke's house in Glou-
cester-place A. She had been there. Q. flow
Giten-1 A. She had bees them several times on the

imailleAt of •Colonel 511awem-Q. 144. stie betn.with
itip.Curte-on any other-occasion ? A. Yes, on'tliat'
0i Jilhason and Williainson.----Q, Had she been with.
her on occasions of any other transaction, except those
-Of Shame, Johnson and Williamson ? A. She could
not recollect.—Q. He -understood that the witness
•had given in the names of several others ; were these
the only business on which the witness had gone to
Mrs. Clarke'st A. she had never gone cin any par-
ticular business, except that of Colonel Shaw, and the
papers had all been returned.
Q. Was the witness Well acquainted with the house
in Glouceiter-place ?A. She had-been in several of
the rooms.—. Very handsome furniture in that
Q house ?A. Yes.—Q. Magnificent ?A. Yes.—Q.
How long had she been acquainted with Mrs. Clarke?
A. Since Mt —Q. Was it on Colonel Shaw's bu-
siness she went first to Mrs. Clarke's ? A. She had
gone before that time.—Q. On what occasion ? A.
She heard that Mrs. Clarke had the power of pro-
curing commissions.—Q. Did the witness wish to en-
gage in the business of procuring commissions ? A.
Yes.—Q. For whom ? A. For no particular person:
she had fallen into misfortunes, and had gone to Mrs.
Clarke with a view to get employment in the negoci-
ation of commissions, in order to retrieve her own
embarrassments..—Q. The witnessfrequently received
letters'from Mrs. Clarke, did she not ? A. Yes.—Q.
What was the last time she received a letter from Mrs.
Clarke ? A. She always returned them the first time
she iiw her after.—Q. Repeated. A. The last let.
ter she received from Mrs. Clarke was on the business
of Colonel Shaw,' she believed.
Q. The witness then never kept any of Mrs.
Clarke's letters by her ? A.' No.—Q. Was it an
invariable rule to return them ? A. Yes.
Q. (By Mr. R. WILLIAMS) The witness had said,
that she had been in most of the rooms of the house
at Gloucester-place ? A. Yes.—Q. Then how did
she reconcile that with what she before stated, that
she had only seen Mrs. Clarke twice ? A. She did
not recollect to have stated that. [lt appeared that
the witness had only said, that she had seen Mrs.
Clarke twice since a certain period.]—.Q. The wit-
ness had said that she had not visited Miss Taylor
from motives of delicacy. -How was.it that the same
delicacy did not prevent her visiting Mrs. Clarke ?
A. She had before stated the reason that induced her
to visit. Mrs. Clarke.
Q. (By Lord MILTON) Who told the witness that
Mrs. Clarke had commissions to dispose of ? A. Ge-
neral report.—Q. He wished the witness would en-
deavour to recollect some individual ? A. She did
not recollect any individual. She remembered hay.
ing asked a Gentleman for Mrs. Clarke's address.
—Q. Who was that Gentleman ? A. It was a Mr.
Taylor, who had married Mrs. Clarke's sister.--Q.
What was the object of the witness in asking for Mrs.
Clarke's address ? A. That she might call on her.—
Q. Why did the witness return her letters ? A. She
desired that she should do so.—Q. Did she state her
reason ?A. That it might not be known that-she was
engaged in trafficking for commissions.
The witness was then ordered to withdraw.
Sir GEORGE HILL observed, that a letter had
been given in from the Archbishop of Tuam, which
he could not at that time insist on having read, be-
cause tlzough connected with the Archbishop, he was
not able to speak to his writing. His Honourable
Frikeicti(Mr. Beresford) having now come into the,
House, and he being able to speak to the writing,
he wished it should be proved in order to have the let-
ter read ; for he was convinced that *the Archbishop
of Tuam would write nothing which he would be un-
willing to have read in any assembly whatever.
Mr. BERESFORD repeated the last observation,
and upon looking at the letter said that he believed it
. to be the hand-writing of the Archbishop of Timm.
The letter was then read by the Clerk. It was
I signed " Tuam," and addressed to the Rev. Dr.
O'Meara. It stated, that, in consequence of the ap-
plication of Dr. O'Meara, the writer had no objection
to declare, that Dr. O'Meara was a min of tmexceps
tionable character, of a respectable family and inde-
pendent fortunq. This was the whole substance of it.
Mrs. CLARKE was then called in and-examined.
Q. (By Colonel WARDLE.) Did the witness know.
Colonel Shaw ? A. Yes.—Q. Did she recollect ap-
plying for an appointment for him through the me-
dium of the Duke of York ? A. Yes.—Q. What ap-
pointment was that ? A. That of Lieutenant-Colo.;
nel, and some situation on the Sraff.—Q. Was the
I witness to have any pecuniary remuneration in case
i she procured the appointment for him ? A. Yes, she
1 was.—Q. What was it ?A. She could not well re-
i
I collect the sum.—Q. Did she inform the Comman-
der in Chief of the application, and the offer made I
to her ? A. Yes ; she did. He wished to be ap-
pointed to a corps in the Isle of Man, where his fa- i
ther had been Deputy Governor.—Q. Did the wit-
ness mean to say that she applied for this appoint- I
ment ? A. Yes ; but there were stronger claims from
other qnarters.—Q. Did the witness apply for any
other situation for him ? A. Yes.—Q. What was
that ?A. The situation which he now held.—Q. I
Did the witness receive any pecuniary remuneration i
I for this ?A. Yes, she did.—Q. Did she recollect how,
she received the money ? A. She received 3001. from
Colonel Shaw, and 2001. from some other man.—
; Q. Was she satisfied With the 001. ? A. No.--Q.
Did she on this account complain to the Commander
,in Chief ?A. Yes.—Q. What was the consequence l
of that complaint ? A. His Royal Highness said, that 1
he had told her all along, that she had to deal with
a man who required. peculiar care ; and that he I
' -would put him 'on half pay.---Q. Was he actually' I
put on half pay ? A. Yes ; and he wrote her sever a'.
letters, in consequence of which she took little notice,
as she thought he was already very well off, consi- i
&ring his conduct towards her.
One of the letters was given in and read. It con- it
tained a dismal complaint of the injury which he had ;
suffered. He apologised for the intemperance of some t
of his former letters, and asserted_ that his conduct to
Mrs. Clarke would stand perfectly fair when the whole
of the circumstances were developed. He solicited
her good offices in getting him restored to full pay, 1
and remove the obstacle to his family joining him at
the Cape, and that he would give an additional se3oo. I
IQ. (Examined by Mr. CROAKER.) He understood I
that the witness had before said, that she never had''
represented herself as a widows did she still abide by
that assertion ?A. Yes, she never said so.--Q. Had.
She never said that she was a widow ? A. She had
never said so, except on occasion of the Court Mar.;
' dal., to which she hub formerly adverted.. Iliac eves.

,said so es py,Atker occasion k rant be_ in,jnicr•—
'9. Frad she eVer said so on ant occasion - e .ctpt
that of the Court Martial ? If the Oentleman %%wild
put her in mind of it, she would answer.te the best of •
her recollection.r.Q. Repeated.—.A. I-beg leave to
repeat the vim!. answer.
Mr. CROAKER—If the Committee thinks that a
sufficient answer, I•nrn satisfied.
__

Q. Had the witness called herself by any other name
than that of Clarke since 1800 ? A. She did not re•
collect that she ever did ; but it was not unlikely that
she might have done it, to 'avoid bailitft,.--.Q.'Wei
it so conunon a thing with the witness to represent
herself under false names, that she could not recolleet
Any particular time or place ? A. She only wished
that the gentleman would point out the instance, and
she would answer the qudtion immediately.
Q. Had she ever called herself by the name of
Dowler ? A. No ; but it was not unlikely that others
shOuld have called her so ; she never represented her-
self as so called.---Q. The witness was positive that
slig never called herself by the name of Dowler ? A.
No ; she could not recollect without being told : it
must have been in joke if she ever said 50..-. Q. When
the witness lived at Hampstead did she not go by the
name of Dowler ? A. No. She went by her own
name.—Q. Or in the neighbourhood of Hampstead?
A. She went by her own name only.—Q. Whose
was the house in which she lived at Hampstead ?
A. It belonged to a Mr. Nichols.—Q. How long did
she live there ? A. Some months.—Q. During the
whole of thetiine she went by her own name ?
Yes.—Q. What year was that ?A. The end of 1807,
and part of 1808.
Q. The witness had said that she had only seen
Dowler twice since his arrival in Englan ; once when
he called on her, and once in the witne 1s room. Did
she still abide by that assertion ? Akdi As she was
afraid of being caught in a story, she would say that
she had seen him once besides.—Q. Did she not say
that she had only seen him twice ? A. It was true
she had seen him twice ; but she might have seen
him three times (a laugh.) Q. Where has she seen
him the third time she alluded to ? A. In this House.
Q. How often besides these three times had she seen •
him, since his arrival in England? A. Once or twice
since yesterday.—Q. The witness was not afraid now
of being caught in a story, and would answer with
perfect recollection—How much oftener than she
had mentioned had she seen Dowler ? A. If the
Gentleman wished her to say that she had seen him
oftener, she would say so if it answered any purpose.
CHAIRMAN—It is my duty, and a painful one it is,
to inform the witness, that she is not to make obser-
vations upon the proceeding of the Gentleman who is
examining her, but to answer the questions directly.
Mrs. CLARKE.—I have done so as well as I recol-
lect.
Q. Does she shape her answers so as to make them
agreeable to the person who is examining her ?
[A cry of no, no, no !—Withdraw, withdraw !]
Q. At what other times, and in what other places
had the witness seen Mr. Dowler since his arrival in
England ? A. She had seen him at his own hotel.—
Q. When ? A. On the same night on which he re•
turned, which was to be a perfect secret, as she did
not wish that her family should know of it.
[The meaning of this answer being very evident,
there was some confusion in the Committee, as many
members appeared to think-Shea-Mee of examiaatioa
improper.]
The wi mess was then ordered to withdraw. •
Mr. CROAKER defended the question he had put,
but was very ready to leave it to the sense of the Corn.
mittee.
Mr. WILBERFORCE thought that the House
must be sufficiently disgusted with some of the evi-
dence that had already been adduced, and he depre-
cated entering any farther into a line of examination •
that did not appear to him to bear upon the question,
but to be altogether unworthy of a Legislative As-
sembly.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER
thought the question which was put was perfectly
fair. It was of the utmost importance that the cha. •
racter not only of Mrs. Clarke, but of Mr. Dowler,
should be tried as much as possible. Mr. Dowler
had represented himself-as a most unwilling witness,
and stated that he never saw Mrs. Clarke more than
twice before his first examination : and that the first
time he called upon her was merely to deprecate his
being called to the Bar of that House as a witness.
It was therefore necessary that the House should ap.•
preciate the credibility of Mr. Dowler as well as pf
Mrs. Clarke.
Mr. FITZGERALD thought the question entirely
irrelevant to the matter at issue, and leading only to.
private scandal that was quite extraneous to the mat-
ter in issue. If the time of the House was to be taken
up in idle conversations and idle examinations of this
kind, the business would never be concluded.
Mr. CROAKER explained. He thought the ques-
tion had led to a most important fact. If it was true
that Mr. Dowler and Mrs. Clarke passed the night
together, they had time enough for concerting any ,
plot. .
Sir GEORGE WARRENDER allowed that
Mrs. Clarke had in this, as well as some other in:
stances, contradicted herself. It was not, however,
contradictions of this kind which could seriously in-
validate her testimony. If, in the main point upon
which her evidence went, she could be contradicted,
if it could 134 proved that Dowler got his appointment
in any other way than that--which she stated, sucla
contradictions would be important ; but if it was
only contradictions of this nature that they expected
to get, he did not think it worth while pursuing the
examination.
Mr. BRAGGE BATHURST thought, that wisest
there was only one person to speak to positive eon.
ruption, it was necessary that the credit of that person
should be sifted as closely as possible.
Mr. ADAM thought it necessary, fully, as much
with the view of trying the credit of Mr. Dowler as
that of Mrs. Clarke. At present, Mr. Dowler had
deposed to a fact, from which it was impossible to
move him, as no contradictory evidence could be
produced. It therefore becameabsolutely necessary,
to try what degree of credit he was entitled to. .
Mn:s CLARKE was' then called in again, and her
eaamination was continued.
Q. Whether the witness has seen Mr. Dowler maw
than twice since his Tatum from Portugal ? A. I
May have seen,him oftener than twice.—.Q. Wiser*
tine witness see him t A. I saw him once * his
hotel.—Q. How.often did the witness see him at his

.1* •

• 1,101(e/117'AX
• .1,11 was done
• 'ts Clarke ? A
'•, hreAk off, of
'.
le day in milk]
tr
,te from Mrs. (
for the rnoi
pern coule
Penbtni ld
she cou
ke sent for it
-I'n • and state h
the 1
11[1' not describe
:3 bat his inter
e recommer
I.:aye of at
hich peril
1-lighne
th
3Q. After this, Y
A. Yes.
lonel Shav
A
Shaw
. I d,
off and
:1„.,,
,nce respect
(1. •
• r, ti:at
A.
71
1.,1 to 1'
; •
K.lcw th
t
h
a..d not
▪ did n
\Viler.
`'"'• i'
.imetlts,
nd inn"
s:cor.d apl
Clarke ?
• the date
' •
( •
fi
s"' • be
llecern
r:re:faC.)n
? A. I
t of visitin
;:rr, trenuently.
cannot
r) April
Q. Wire you i
c.lp;cl Shaw ?
Lim frequently,
and he
..i,per.cc.—.(2.
tea? I return
EMIT', two or t
r..Dt c,lknolt;
le.ween Colone
By Mr. Dot
Wally, Or by z
a: a eitncss at
rs: Taylor. Si
Taylor
td::er or ieput
!Teak from hea
Q. Flom what
• believe,
j:-.1„:e between I
A. snort cow
b
A. i Jo not
Shaw at
Tersz., and, i
rt:c.w. of bad
1.1.1 not return,
sometbit
Tayl
dcn't suppose
sta.
• rd.-. FULL
re tat she v
quest
Arrc
trr.:,:nation t(
BARI-
Icvant, and s;
r.er,cu who W
he: retson for
EULI
f.,:ts:l.ernale
lie ins
that he
child sht
: BAT:
• ar
to
a_aal I
••••
.:(: to
witn
•:rJtn
;
• WAS (
Dy N
kn,
:s TIC
rc-.: sec l'.om
merely
Q• (By
• A. J
!
I.llb
wh
•
0.
.
(.:lark, I v
✓ated all 11
Ct. 'Plc lo
1.12VC:
t]
5 .
.(tr ',ll-1E
1 wtt
(
•,..:
(..• •
• .
erc