Star.
London, England, 1812-11-27 00:00:00

I4R.LIAMENTARr PROCZEDDIGS.

HOUSE OP LORDS, N0V.26.
The LORD CHANCELLOR took hirteat on the Wool-
lack, at a quarter betore three o'clock, and the Clerks
irnmediately proceeded to administer the oaths to
such Peers as presented themselves for the purpose.
i• Several Lords were sworn in the course of the sit-
ting j and at four o'clock the House adjourned.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.
This days at twelve, the SPEAKER, for the first time,
entered the House in state, attired in the Speaker's
robes. He was attended by the Chaplain of the
House, and Prayers were read, as usual; previous to
his t.dcing the Chair. The SPEAKER tOOk his seat at
the table when the Chaplain retired, Where he re-
mained till a sufficient number of Members were pre-
sent to form a House.. Shortly after half•past twelve,
he began to count, and at about a quarter past one
he was enabled to take the chair, forty persons being
present. The House then proceeded to swear in the
Members present, who had not previously taken the
oaths. This was continued until four o'clock, when
the House adjourned.

Lifir_nv.teALlGENcE

•
COURT OF CFIANCERY, NOVEMBER '
HAYIVIARKET 'THEATRE.
MORIUS 11. COLMAN. s.
The LORD CHANCF.LLOR said—" I have written to
Mr. Crofts (theßegistrir) what appears to me to be
right in this cause, and it is taken terbatim from the
words of Mr. Colman himself."
BANKRUPT PETITIONS.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said, it might be import-
ant to the profession to be informed that, immedi-
ately after the next Seal, he should hear all those i
Bankrupt Petitions which had for their object the
staying of Certificates and superseding Commissions.
PATENT.BRAINER V. mums.
Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY stated, this was the Petition'
of the Plaintiff, who had applied for a Patent for an'
improvement he had made in coach-wheels and
coach-springs ; —the Defendant had put in a caviare,
claiming that he was in possession of the same secret.
The question was referred to the Attorney-General,
who decided that the .Plaintiff's plan was quite dif-'
feient from the Defendant's, as it related to the
wheels ; after this decision the Plaintiff and Defen-
dant had a conversation relative to their invention of
coach springs, when the Plaintiff said, that by his in-
vention there was no metallic substance used, but
something that lie (the Defendant) could not exist
without, on which the Defendant replied, he knew
what it was, for it was the same as his invention,
condensed air, on which the Plaintiff said he was wil-
ling to have their different plans laid before an arbi-
trator, and if he thought they Were both alike, tha
Defendant should be a joint patentee. The arbitra-
tor decided that they were not alike, as the Delen-
dant's plan merely consisted of condensed air, con-
fined in leather bags and bladders, quite different
from the invention of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff
then applied for a patent, and the Defendant entered
his caveat, to get rid of which, the present applica-
tion was brought. It had been already decided by
his Lordship in a case of'a patent for sugar refining.
One of the party said he was put in possession of the
secret by an American; and the other asserted he
was put in possession of it by a Frenchman ; but the
Court determined that the party who applied first for
the patent was entitled to it. The question at present
was a similar one, and his Lordship had only to de-
cide the same point over again.
Mr. JOHNSON opposed the motions
The LORD CHANCELLOR observed, that he was,
and had always been cf opinion, that when two per.
sons in trade were in possession of the same secret,.,
the party first applying for a Patent, was entitled
to it : under which consideration he would grant the
prayer of the Petition.
COURT OF KING'S BENCH,NOV. 26.
CUMBERLIDOE V. BORROWDALE AND Aeolan.
The SOLICITOtt-GENEHAL sliewed cause in this
case, *against a rule obtained by Mr. Scarlett, to set
aside an award made by the arbitrators, to whom
the points in dispute between the parties had been
refined. The grounds Upon which the rule was
obtained were, first, that the arbitrators had found a.
balance of £625 ss. ld, to be in the hands of De-
fendants—whereas the actual balance in their hands
was £19,198 9s. 2d. ; next, that they had awarded
parts of a certain agreement between Plaintiff and
Defendants, to be null and void—when, in fact, they
were not so ; and lastly, that discounts claimed by
Defendants, upon certain expenditures, were allowed,
to which Defendants were not entitled. The Soli-,
citor-General said, he did riot think it necessary to
enter into a long and particular detail of the affida-
vits of Defendants, but should content himself with
stating what was in truth the plain and intelligible
view of the subject. The question in dispute hful
arisen upon the accounts connected with the pro-
ceeding of an East India ship, called the Surrey.—aia'
Of this ship the Defendants were the husbands, and
to them was intrusted the payment of all tradesmens'
bills, and, in fact, the whole disbursements connected
with the ship. To enable them to do this, the other
persons interested in the ship paid into their hands
certain proportions of the money which it might be
necessary to expend—and upon an adjustment of
accounts, the differences which led to the award
arose. With respect to the question of the balances,
which were so materially different from the statement
of Captain Cumberlidge, the truth was, that Defen-
dants, at the time in which they had rendered their
accounts, had held in their hands a very large sum,
for which they were answerable as ship's husbands,
to the tradesmen who had supplied to the ship Sur-
' rey the necessary supplies for outfit, &c. This sum
they telt justified in holding back, and had actually
since paid the bills for which it had been so withheld.
Thus, therefore, _the award had most equitably stat-
ed, that the real balance due was but £625. Upon
the second point, as to the arbitrators 1:-ving render-
l'ed the agreement between Plaintiff arid Defendant
i null and void, this was done inconsequence of Plain-
tiff himselfheving departed front the specific terms
of that agreement ; and upon the last points as to
I discounts—these discounts were received. by Defen-
dants, for prompt payenent to the tradesmen of the
alp, lion) who'd diey were entitled to along credit;

and to these discoonts; Plaintiff; on various occa-
sions, had assented.

' Before the Court was called upon for Judgment,
however, the parties, who were in Court, said, they
only wanted to have an equitable adjustment of their
accounts, and were satisfied, therefore, tti'stibmit the
matters in dispute to any Gentleman at the Bar.
The arguments were in consequence stopped.
CRIMINAL INFORMATION.
THE XING V. DELL AND HARVEY.
Mr. Scattier :hewed cause against the Rule for a
Criminal Information obtained by the Solicitor-Ge-
neral in this case. Our Readers will recollect that
the parties are merchants, and that the challenge and
posting of Mr. Parsons by Mr. Bell the younger, which
gave rise to the present application, originated in a
quarrel at Batson's Coffee-house, whey, angry and
ungentlemanlike words having passed, Mr. Bell sent
his friend, Mr. Harvey, to convey a challenge to Mr.
Parsons ; for which purpose, Mr. Harvey followed
him to the house of a friend at Stratford, in Eisex,
where l►e had gone to dine ; and thereon being refu-
sed an apology, delivered to him a challenge from
Mr. Bell, and also informed him, on his refusal to
accept it, that he had orders from Mr. Bell to call
him a coward and a scoundrel, and that he should
post him as such. This was accordingly done the
following morning, at some of the principal Coffee-
houses.

Mr. SCARLETT, however, contended, that the first
aggression in this case had been on the part of Mr.
Parsons himself, who had not acted very fairly in his
affidavit, in pretending to question, Mr. Bell's solven-
cy, knowing as lie .dfd,ithat the original declinature
of Masterman and Cato accept the bills for Mr.
Bell was occasioned by the recent failure of Messrs.
Sharp and Co ; but that they were afterwards will-
ing to accept thm, bad Mr. Parsons again presen-
ted.them for payment; and well knowing, in addi-
tion, as they also could not fail doing, that Mr. Bell
had offered to Mr. Parsons, long before the bills had
come to maturity; the whole sum of £lO,OOO in
Bank of England notes, if he would give him up the
bills of lading of the cargo, as he ought to have done,
but which he refused to do. He had also, the Lear-
ned Counsel contended, been the first aggressor, and
had originally, as appeared from the affidavits read
in answer, applied to Mr. Bell the epithet of ' no
gentleman." The Court would always, he submit-
ted, in such a case, look to the conduct of parties,
and if they saw, as he conceived they must do in the
present case, that the party applying was not only
not blameless, but that,he had a considerable share
of demerit in the transaction, they would not think
him entitled to the extraordinary interference of the
Court, which he expected from the present applica-
tion, but would leave him to his common remedy at
law.

Mr. BROUGHAM argued tin the same side, contend-
ing, that the question for the consideration of the
Court was, whether, from the conduct of the two
parties in this unpleasant affair, their Lordships must
feel themselves entitled to interfere ? or if they would
not rather leave the party esteeming himself aggrie-
ved to his ordinary remedy at law, of which, by the
refusal of the present extraordinary remedy, the pro-
secutor would not be deprived ? This question, he
presumed to think, was determinable in a great mea-
sure from a view of the affidavits, and from looking
attentively to this fact, which of the two parties
seemed first to have conducted himself in an ungo-
vernable manner. From an attentive consideration
of the whole of the affidavits on both sides, he con-'
tended, it was obvious that the prosecutor, in the
first instance, addressed the defendant in a haughty
and imperious manner, giving him what he himself
called, 46 a rebuke for his unmercantile conduct,"
which'rebuke it elsewhere appeared, and was not de-
nied, consisted in the using to him of these words,
.that he had not conducted himself as a “ gentleman
or a merchant." For such words Mr. bell could
have no action, though they were greatly calculated
to injure him. It was within a hour afterwards that
he sent Mr. Harvey to Mr. Parsons to demand an
apology, and that apology being refused, it was,
while uhf subject to the irritation of feeling thus oc-
casioned, that the breach of the peace, which he
(Mr. B.) was far'from vindicating, was committed.
The SOLICITOR-CENIRAL was about to reply, when
Lord ELLENBOROUGH said he needed not. It was
time for the Court to put an end to this spurious chi-
valry of the counting-house and the counter. They
had before them yesterday a linen-draper of Ciren-
cester, who from having been for a few months in a
regiment of local militia, seemed to think that he had
a right to assume all the consequence of the most'
lofty military character. It was impossible to say
whether any of the present parties had any preten-
sions to the character of soldiers ; but this they did
see, that while they ought to be employed in poitiv
their books, they chose rather to be employed in pos-
ting each other 1 There was one thing which the
Court thought it right to correct. It was not neces-
sary that a person applying to them for a criminal
information should be quite blameless. If the grant-
ing of such an information was deemed essential to the
support of the public peace, the Court would grant
it, though the party applying were not only not
blameless, but though he were even blameable. If
the challenge and even the posting had followed to
inslanti, the case would have been different; but here
the defendant followed the prosecutor to his own
home, and from thence sends a friend after him, on
this mischievous message.
Mr. Justice Goose said the Court had only to look
to the protection of the public peace : and for the
protection of the public peace, it was essential that
the present Rule should be made absolute.
The Rule made, absolute.

OASICOYNE o. WINSTANLET.

Mr. READER moved to make a Rule, which he had
obtained in this case, absolute.

The object of the Rule was t' enlarge the time
stipulated in a bail-bond entered into by Defendant
for the surrender-of a debtor, named Wdmott; and
the ground of the application was, the fact of Wil-
mott being in the custody of the Sheriff of Notting-
ham, and from an accident which he had experi-
enced, by which his legs were so dreadfully frac-
tured as to prevent the possibility of removal withuut
imminent danger of his life.
Mr. RICHARDSON opposed the Rule generally,
,upon its being inconsistent with the principles of
cases already decided. The bail had one of two
things to perform, either he must surrender the
debtor, or pay the debts the former, it was gated,

he costa not by potability-perform,
quence, he was bond to pursue the
was left.
Resew, for the Rule, argued,
Lordships had already decided, that
was a legal impossibility for the bail
stipulations of the hail-bond, that
exonerated. In cases where Alien:
out al the country this principle had
!acted upon. There was.a, case also i
Report's, 86 Wood v. Mitchell," of
dency. In that case the debtor had
to transportation. Here there was
Ibility of his being rendered by his
!sequence an exoneration was entered
bond. In the present case, the
contended the same impossibility exi:
step which Defendant couldadopt
11debtor he had adopted, namelWhe
;of Habeas Corpus, directed to the
county of Nottingham, In whose custod
was, and by the return of that writ
that the Sheriff could not remove hi'
out almost the certainty of death. 1
cumstances Mr. READER expressed
Court would grant him the indull
he sought, that was, to have time
debtor, until the first four days of
which time it was probable a lento.
Safety take place.
Lord ELLEN BOROUGH admitted
of the decisions which had taken pl.
cited by Mr. Reader, and the Codrr
absolute.

EXCHEQUER CHAMBER, NOVEMBER
SITTINGS IN NQUITY.
EARNSHAW V. CLARK&
The plaintiff in this case filed a
praying for a decree to cause an acct
of a promissory note for the paymenl
interest, which had been girea by dm
debndant.

It appeared in this case, that a Gent.
surnmne of Walker, possessing a small
near Leeds, in the county of Yor!-
among his daughters, Eliza, Marth,
Martha, when sne Was young, marti,
the name of ClArk, by whom she hat,
coming embarrassed in her circurti
rowed the sum of ,elOO from her
which she gave a note, promising p,
being the note for which the present
'me time afterwards Eliza married
present plaintiff, and by a marriage
the bridegroom has written with his
surrendered to his jurisdiction all al
the money which she held in the ft
derable amount. Mrs. Earnshaw kepi
the promissory note, and on the death
Martha, she presented it as a gift
without the privity or concurrence
In the mean time, the donor had beet
in body, and her husband anticipating
lity of her mind becoming .feeble ah
inquest made into her goods, chattels,
property, in the course of which he
missory note in question. The Bill
filed in Equity, and Mr: Hall appeared
Martin t 6 support. it.
These Learned Gentlemen mail
an accurate eignination which they
matriage settlement, Eliza Walker
to her husband, the plaintiff, the whole
vested in the funds, reserving for
land 'lnheritance, out of which sel4B
yearly to her husband, in case that
Such being the nature of,the marrii
they contended, that the husband, ac.
ancient proposition in law, became mat,
manager, the controler, and proprietor
money and inheritance which appertai-
unless that she had reserved it to herself
stipulation. Under these circumstances
inherited no power to diminish by eztr
the property of her husband ; the pre
question, though the plaintiff had pen..
to retain it her possession, was, neverthet
his property, and he had the right tc
Should she choose or be prevailed ui._
it away, without hit privity or concurrence.
fore, they humbly submitted to their
such a giving away, and cancelling ,
an act null and void, and they prayed
might be granted.
On the part of the defendahu it
-on the expiess authority of several
which was made by Sarah Walker,
plaintiff's wife, that an entire juristll
property of Eliza Walker was not surrendered
husband by the matriage settlement
been in her contemplation. She ga'
true, an authority and power over
had amassed in the funds—but surel,
note could not be said to appertain
being part of her own priVate pocket-mote,
sides, from a conversation that acs'
place, on the death of Martha Walker,
plaintiff and his wife, it appeared, ths,
'himself by no means entitled to the atone,
the bill. Having satisfied himself con(
money that was due to him, he incp
had received satisfaction for the piomiss.
belonged to her ? Certainly such.a question
they remarkable, if the husband really
he possessed a power over the personal
his spouse. The husband, having
marriage settlement himself, certainl:
r plated a jurisdiction. over her estate
ney, when lie particularly described
the estate which was to appertain
therefore maintained, that his wife
of making a present of the promis
niece, and submitted, that the Bill
missed.
IThe Lord Chief Baron, Sir ALzrattora
nat.o, said—" The woman gave at
I WI note to her niece, believing that
power which, by the act of marriage
nut belong to her."

There is a pleashig noweity in the
customs—at least so it would appear
Sure the Public express at the return '
of drawing every Ticket separately
instead of determining two or three
late Lotteries..

•
irtn, an& in eon
be only course•tli
argued, that the'
that where the
nil to perform th
at they shniild
ions bad been sea
sad been invariabl
so in the Ith Ter
of a similar te•
sad been sentenc
is an utter impos
is bail, and in con
ered upon the bail
e learned Counse
existed. The onl
opt to render th
he sued out a wri
the Sheriff' of th
custody the debt•
writ it appeared
it his prisoner *it
. Under these cir
id a hope that th
lulgence for whi
Lime to render th
of next Term, b,
moral might wi
the sound polic
place in the cast
run made the R
OVEMBER 2C
'Y.
AKS.
bill lb Equi
recount to be tat
neat or £lOO, wit.
r the mother of th
Gentlirman, of th
small inheritand
ork, left his esta
irtha, and Sarah.
married a person • ;
had children. B
intstinices, she bor'
er sister Eliza, f• •
payment on sigh
!nt bill was file •
tied Earnshaw; t
ge settlement whit
his own hand,
1 and the whole .
funds,"to a consi •
r kept possession o
death of her sist
ift to her children
ice of her frasband
become debilitate.'
iating the probab.
also, got a stri -
ittels, and person
he missed the pr•
ill was immediate'
.ppeared with Mr.
saintained, that by
ley had made of tt.,
er had surrender •
whale of her money
it herself only the
148 was to be pai•
at he survived her.
arriage settlement;
, according to
he immediately the
prietor of all that
ertained to his wife.'
erself by an expre
lances the wu
exmaiagant gifts
promissory note i •
I permitted his wif
rvertheless, wholl
It to recall it again;
upon to squander
rcurrence. There.
teir Lordships, that
1g of the bill, was
tyed that the deer
it was maintained
al affidavits, one of
the sister of the
risdiction over the
surrendered to h
sent; nor had ever
gave him, it was
✓ what money she
irely a promissory
tain to the fundsi
Kket-money ? Be.
t accidentally took
'alter, between the
, that he conceived
e money due upo
I concerning some.
squired it his wife
tomissory note the
sa tp/eStiOd was r
really believed tha
msonal. property •
ing drawn out .th
ainly never coltem
ate and pocket-In •
bed that portion o •
alit to him. The
ite had the pow
missory note to he -
Bill might be di
kLZZANDZIt MAC. •
away the promi
that she possessed
Inc settlement, di. '
•
t the revival" or
pear from the pie
irn to Ilse old ma
•ly from the Whet
ye at once, as in to
. • --

THEATRES.

Res performed Hank*, for
on Wednesday evening last, at this
exertions were received with the ap-
iey deserved. Mr. RAE is aninte-
id without any of that imitation which
servility, has sufficiently imbibed
more practised performers, to exhibit the
: but it may be questioned whether
rady tried it often enough kr his fame.
- Hamlet, unrivalled as it is for moral

poetic phrase, is unfortunately drawn
length, that the spirit of an audience is
unremitting and unending excellence.
this lacfiust falls, with sure vengeance
and the fatigue of the five acts, and
inevitably thrown from the play by
ider to taste would venture to confess
misted, on the unlucky representative.
be borne, while it is considered merely
data; but further experiments are
be wisely hazarded. From the itf-
RAZ has already made, we are in-
favourably of those which are to fix
stage. Since Mr. Kizsma's with-
tve no first rate Tragedian ; and much
of the Drama in its excellence must
of powers which left so little to be re-
at least a large opening for succes-
_ rivalry. An animated countenance,
person, an articulate, if not a peculiarly
are among Mr. RAE'S obvious quail&
iihout these, eminence is absolutely un-
-ith these, the common diligence of an
the common comprehension of an in-
can scarcely fail of securing a strong
public, who are at no time slow to in-
s for those who come forward with
legitimate pretensions to their favour.
JIN.—THOMSOWS Tragedy of Tattered
was last night revived, for the purpose
forward Mr. BEITY in the character of
suitable to his age, and not beyond his
as not requiring any very powerful
part of Tancred Mr. BETTY was not
.heis in Desiglat or Adamet. Indeed,
perfect sameness about him, 'that the
Queen Elizabeth applied to her policy
it we may compare small things with
well be applied to his style otacting,
_ the same. There is no diversity in the
gestures, and the tones of his Douglar, his
his 7ancred ; and it may almost be said,
seen him in one of hischaracters is to have
The part of Sigisnowida was very well
Mrs. H. Jo FINSTOti g and the other cha-
spectably sustained, but the play is of
cast, and too deficient, in interest, to be

arce succeeded, and went off as usual,
-mance of that scene in which Flexible
res an account of what passed in Court.
• repeated what he as Counsel had
itted the imitations of the Judge.—
, so adroitly, that it was not at first per-
,hen the scene closed without furnishing
expected, much disapprobation was
The hisses, at, first weak and partial,
loud and general, and the succeeding
lttended to at all.—( Cries of " Of,
thrum ;" "No curtailment ;" Imitations,"
heard from all parts of the house ; till
)ade his appearance. The tumult now
than before, and MaTnaws at length
and addressed 'the audience in the

Gentlemen— I am desired by the Managers,
to ask, what is your pleasure?"
of answers were here given, which it
precisely to collect. They generally
which had been omittei.

replied...-
Gentlemen-1 understand what you mean. As
• interest and my duty, to do every thing in my
Ate to the entertainment of the Public. be imi-
called for, which has been named by a Gentleman
was introduced without arty earthly intention
ly person. It was taken by the -audience and
air manner, which I did notexactly understand.
was no intention on the part of either the au-
give offence to any one. I feel myself placed in
d situation, but a circumstance has occurred, in
which, for particular reasons, I can only say that
to omit it."

as received with great applause, and
on without farther interruption.

is engaged eight nights at the Bath
edhesday he commenced with Macbeth;
was to play Rolla, in Pir.arro ; to-mor-
ldvertised for the Stranger, Xing John
are both in rehearsal for his perfor-
_k.
friends of the Drama, as well as to huma-
have laudably come forward to per-
. the Theatre, in the course of a a short
benefit of their tellow-townsmen confi-
' prison.

.RA had a home at Moscow, which,
ire, was consumed at the time of the
She is now in St. Petersburgh, and
health.

our matches will be made immediate-
-IRTER, who challenges any body; and
challenges any thing of l'2 stone. Two
made, and the learned are searching men
champions.
iser took the benefit of clergy, on Mon.
It is technically termed, in the milling
thing a sweep's daughter, the envy of isling-
The bride looked enchanting, in an ele-
' mob cap, and a broad laced mode cloak.
'wo genteel dressed men took up their
'eathers, a short distance from Ches.
's since, with their livery servant, on
termed a sporting ramble, and by self-
they got acquainted with some respecta
purchased a freehold sporting.boa.—
succeeded in getting upwards of iB2OO in mo-
- eshich they decamped with a pair of good
chaise, which they hired for a week, as
hackney for their servant, no doubt an
and unfortunately, justice has not yet

•
RY- LAN R.-
e third time, or
'heau e, and his e
•lause which the
*ng sctor ; and
. proaching to
.e spirit of more
• art with effect :
e has not already
he tragedy of I
• auty and poeti
to such length,
,orn out, in its un
e penalty of 0
pon the actor; a
' ix five hours, is i
hich no pretends
at he was ezhau
ven this may be
s a ttial for aek
•
perilous to b
orts which Mr.
lined to augur ft
•is rank on the s
• yawing, we have
the admirers of
gret the loss of
limed, there is a
ion, if not for riv
graceful person
inking voice, are
• tions. Withon
ttainable; with
tive, and tht
elligent man, cat
• • terest with a pu
crest themselves
.onourable and It
COVENT•GARDI
• &zinnias& wa
•f bringing' forty
Touted; a part sui
.pe of acting,
ents. In the p
Inferior to what h
is such kpe]
motto which Quo
temper eadem), it
;great, may very s
which i$ always 0
• rugs, the gestu:
Itichmei, or his 7e
bat to have seen t
..seen him in all. I
'supported by Mn
racters were resp
lon. mediocre a cast
• en repeated.
l'he new Farce
1 the perform]
'MAznzws) gives
Htre he merely
stated, and omitt
This was done so
'eeived ; but when
that which was e
.snanifested. The
goon became low
scene was not art
44 Afaihrive ,
&c.) were heard
, Flexible again mat
!became louder th
came forward, a
'following words :
g• Ladies and Gee
iinust respectfully to
A multitude of
,was not easy pie
. tailed for that set
• MATHLWS repli
Ladies And Gent!
Actor it is my Inv
f • er to contribute to
tartan which is called
st under my ear, w
to give offence to any
epplisdin a particular
I am certain there wa
thor or actor to give
it very awkward situ.
consequence of which
It ael twit ively obliged t
' This speech w a
the Farce went or
Mr. KastaLE is
heatre Wedht
st night he was
ow night he is ad
nd Condianut are
• antes next week.
Several friends
ity, in Iliston, ha
• 07 M a Play in the
• 'me, for the bent
ed in a French p
Madame MA RA
ith the furniture,
on flagration. St
'njoys perfect heal
Box ER&—Four
y, including CA R'
FULLER, who chal
• • atches are made,
or the former cha
Ford the bruiser
day List, by what i
hool,swideiriz a
ton beauties. The
cant spangled :no'
SWINDIARS—TW
bode at the Feal
not, a few days
hat they termee
*lade titles, they
!pie people, and As
They succeeded it
y ; after which
orses, in a Glais4
Well as with a hac
• accomplice, and
'erudite& them