Star.
London, England, 1809-08-04 00:00:00

Several other witnesses were examined to the same.ficts.

LorsfELLIENIBOROUGH observed, that it was proved the beach
bad gone over and encroached on the pasturage of. the Plainuff.
Now if the Lord had a right to the stones, it would not give him a
right to the soil and fret-hold, which was the issue on the Recut.!,
by ..which the Lerd clainied the place is par: of his freehold at,d
waste. The latter's mark on shore was only that which lay be-
tween high and low water mark, and was alter-Lately wet ar.4
dry. Verdict for Plaintiff—Damages One Shilling.

• THE KING V. MARTINS.
This wag an indictment against the defendant, who was Over-
seer of the parish of Wiotham, in this county, for falsely charging
the parish with sums of money in his accounts, with intent to
cheat and defraud them.

Mr. Serjcant BEST took several objections to the indictment,
which were over-ruled, and the the Defendant was found Guilty ;
but, as he had refunded all the money, t►e parish, by their Cew►'
lel, stated, they did aot mewl to pray judgment against him•

• COURT-iII.MTI 6iv LORD .GAJ 131 R.

EIGHTH DA t-POkTSMOUTH, AUG. S.

Captain, KEnn further examined.
fie fitltc(l, tha 1. on the morning of the 13th, as his
,hip was coming out of Isle d'Ais, she was struck
by the batteries nt Isle d'Aix, and some shells from
dieron went ov tr her. One shot struck her below
the mains.
Q. What d; image did you sustain on the 13th ?
A, The bows grit severely wounded, a great part of
the running-r;l:ging and sails cut to pieces, five beams
of tiv cyanic fadeck cut through, the beam entirely
carried away, a number of shot in different parts of
the ,1e.,, three Men killed, and five wounded.
Q. Caa you say, whether you sustained that da-
rnau foam the batteries on shore, or from the ene-
„lA, :iip 2—A. The damages in the hull, and the
kwed and wounded, from the batteries of Isle d'Aix;
rrt of the running rigging from the Aquilon and
Varewie.
Cafe. Maecoast tailed, and further examined.
Q. y,RI have stated that had ships been sent in to
attack ate enemy before the two shipa that were at
enclaz anmoored, that they would be subject to the
lire of these two ships, and also that after .the three-
deckor righted about noon, she could have annoyed
iJe slaps seat in. Are you then of opinion, that it
wouL have been proper to have sent any ship in while
the two ships at anchor and the three-cleckec continti.
ed in those situations, considering also that the ships
sent in would be likewise subject to the fire of the
Fir: eies of the Isle d'Aix, and considering the state
sad direction of the wind at that time ?—A. I think
that ships on no account could, with propriety, have
been sent in to attack the enemy till at least half flood
(abort noon), and that sending them afterwards,
whilst the enemy remained on the defensive, would
have been attended with very considerable risk, be-
cause had they been disabled, the wind as it was,
they coahl not have come nut, but moist have gone
to the mouth of the passage for anchorage, watch
was ili understood, but where I had been led to be-
lieve th erk. was anchorage for a few large ships:
Q. Yee here stared it to be your opinion that half
focd w.i, about noon, and that the enemy's ships got
etf at about two o'clock P. M. and you have in your
answer to the preceding question stated, that any
slaps sent in previous to the removal of the French
~',r,,.: svnuid be liable to considerable annoyance from
them as well as the Isle d'Aix—would you then have
sent ships ire before these ships were got off?—A.
Had I thnught there was no other chance of destroy-
ing these ships but by such an attack, I certainly
think it ought to have been made, but it was under-
stood that they must all again ground at the mouth
of the Charante. where it was the received opinion
that they could he attacked by bombs, gun-brigs, and
fire-ships, wallow: risque, and had we had a reserve
of fire-ships on that morning, I think some of them
would have beea destroyed on the flood time. lucre
were fire-ships prepared with tide with all expedition,
but they were too late.
Q. At what time would you (previous to two
o'clock), had you commanded the British fleet, have
sent ships in to attack the enemy's ships on shore ?
.A. The moment that the two ships quitted their de-
fensive nosition the risk was then small, and I would
iretantly have sent them in, between the hours of one
and avo ; nearly about that time the bombs and brigs
were seat in. The Imperieuse and Beagle soon after
followed them, and in about 20 minutes other ships
signals (all the frigates) were made, the Valiant and
Isteenge he reason these ships did net join the Im-
:,:erau.,.. :is soon as expected, was hoc • use the wind
I,:leJ, and the tide was not in their favour.
2.. A: we bomb and brigs went in to attack the
relay seen after the time that you think was proper
1:: the tae_aiion, when the Imperieuse followed, and
t:-r to .;'-olt twenty minutes after, or less, the Re-
a.nea Valiant, and othee vessels were sent in on the
:me s.:rrice, NY:tat portion of time was there, in your
jainYer.t, which might be termed a delay OIL the'
pre et. !he Commantler in Chief?—A. Certainly not
taae t:1 ... half or three quarters of an hour ; from
fr., ton . the ships quitted their defensive position,'
111.! 'hips were sent in by the signal was all that
Cu', irsil)iy be termed delay, on the whole less than
an hour.

Bur.K:IILL examined ly iic Curt.
Q. \Vie 7,,u in Basque Roads ou tho. 11th of
April, aud wilc:n did you quit it ?—A. I wits there,
vitted it about the 26;11.

Q rrom the first attack on Or? ships of the ene-
*l, to :he
c,n-Jii,-; ;,•1-,ment, was every thing done that'
could be dupe ;:h,:et the destruction of the enemy's
ships?--A. I t'HI: there was.
Trom the tn.e the Commander in Chief's
I:rriv.t! in 13 que ki.ads, to the time of your quivin;;
c,!I you ante any instance of neglect, misconduct,
or inattention to tine 'media service, in the proceed-I,
nY,s of Ile Commander in Chief ?—A. I know of
tone.

Captain BALL, or the Gibraltar,
sworn and examined by the Court, answered
to the same effect as the above witness.

(.'aptain NEWMAN, of the Hero,
szTra and examined by the Court, also an-
red to the same purport; both bearing testithony
;!if'good condut of the Commander in Chief.

%ptaiu EitoUralTON, of the dn,rlia, morn.
lir stated as toIlows—" I w.ts on board the Ame-1
Li when she was ordered to bombard the enemy on
Buovart hNal, and being within gun-shot, of the I
Aix, 1 observed the fortifications ; they appear-
me in a very different state from what they
•'•••-•.; I'vo cr three years before, when I w.as there
t,:n R. Keaw. I thought they were repairing
from the quantity of rubbish that was
I counted on a semicircular battery,
'-•'h commanded the Roads where al.:. enemy lay,
r.r 2() guns. There-was a smailer battery
a • .4. %.1, I don't knc.e the•exact uumbtr of guns,,
•,r ; what I had before taken for a block-•
:••••,,,ied to have no guns whatever ; it appeared
1' a Lirrark, and tican what I observed, these bat.;
•nt, were not se strong as had been suppc.;scd, and
rt;),•rteil my opinion to Lord Gambier.
(By Lord ("..,,.Nimita.) Did you, or could you,
%.r.iin the number of grins or mortars on the
.: •
- ••• the fort ?—A. Nu, certainly not, except as far
4-;trc YAllicArcuiar battery went.
Q (13y the CouaT.) The general questions put to
• fat-nits witues3es, respecting every thing being

dotie to destroy the'enetny-edas then Pit, Isien tie'
,
Witness replied—A. I think it would have been more
advantageous if the line of battle ships, frigates, and,)
smaller vesseli had gone in at half flood, between II
and 12 o'clock.
Q. Were there two of the enemy's line of battle
ships remaining at anchor in Aix Roads ?—A. Yes ;
the Rear Admiral and Commodore's ships.
Q. Did you take notice of the position of the
French three.decket when she was on shore ?—A. Yes,
I did.

Q. At what time did the .twd ships that remained
at anchor remove to the enhance bf the Charante ?
A. I can't speak positively ' • but it was soon after
noon. Soon after the French Admiral and two others
got off arid followed them.

Q. As the t*o ships that remained at anchor did
not leave theii situations until after it was nom), and
the Ocean continued in her position until about the
same time, if the British ships had been ordered in at
11 or 12 o'clock, which you then thought was
the best time, would not the ships so sent in have
been exposed to the fire of the two ships that remain-
ed at anchor, the Ocean, and the batteriestf Aix at
the same time I—A. Certainly ; but I conceived they
were partly panic struck, itnd on the appearance of
a force coming in, might have been induced to cut
their cables, ancl try to make their escape up the
River.

Q. In the event of their proving not to have been
so panic struck, and had 'defended theirstives, aided
by the batteries on shore, are you of opinion that the
British ships must have suffered greatly on the occa-
sion ?—A. I think they woug have suffered ; but a
ship or two might have been placed, in my opinion)
against the Southern batteries of the Isle d'Ait, so as
to have silenced them. I mentioned it to Sir Harry
Neale, when all the Captains were on board the Ca-
ledonia, when speaking of the confusion of the ships
at the time.

Q. How near can ships of the line approach the !
batteries of the Isle d'Aix on that part where you
would have recommended an attack ?—A. Judging
by the chart, I should suppose very closely—about
two cables length.
Q. If ships had been so brought up against the
batteries of the Isle of Aix, and it should have hap-
pened that they had met with such damage as to rest.
der it necessary to withdraw them, and such a case
naturally implies damages in mast and rigging,
which, considering the strength of the wind at the
time, where could their ships have retired to ?—A. I
think as the wind was N. W. and N. they might have
found safe anchorage and protection in what is called
in the French chart Grand Trousse, where there were
SO or 44) feet water, out of range of shot or shell.
Q. Do you think that ships having, been subjected
to the fire of the batteries, at the distance of two or
three cable's length, and finding a necessity for re-
turning fom these batteries, could possibly be in a
condition with a strong N. wind and lee tide, to fetch
the anchorage you have described from the Isle of
Aix, without driving off the Palais shoal ?—A. It
would depend upon circumstances. I conceived the
possibility of the -batteries being silenced. It would
be slack water about two o'cloct and the wind then.
moderate ; they might, I think, fetch the anchorage.
Q. Are we then to understand that you would
have recommended the measure of sending the ships
against the batteries of Aix, upon, the presumption
that the batteries would be silenced, without advert-
ing to what might befal the ships in case of. failure
against the batteries ?—A. I did not give it that consi-
deration at the time, I qnly speak of my own opinion,
that I conceived that it was practicable to recover
that anchorage if disabled, and heard Lord Gambier
the sante morning state, it had been his intention to
have gone against the battery I now speak of, with
the Caleslonsst and other ships,. but as the enemy were
on them,, he did not think it necessary to run any un-
necessary risk, when the object of their destruction
seemed to be already obtained.
Q. Did you on the 12th April know of the safe an-
chorage you have now described for line of battle
ships out of range of shot and shell ?—A. Only by
the Fr eisch charts, and which, having been long ac-
cestonied to use, 1 thought correct. My conjecture
of this being n proper anchorage for ships, arose from
conversation with my brother officers, that should
Lord Gambier think of attacking the enemy in the i
situ uion in which they were when we first came into
Basque Roads, and in case of being materially da- '
malted, if the eluirts are to be believed, there was
waver enough in that position. •
Q. Do you know that from the anchorage in Aix
Road, to that you have just now described, there is •
any shoaler water between the Buoyart and the Palais
shoal ?—A. No, I do not, I sounded as I came in,
but did not find any bar.
Q. You have spoken of conversations you had rela-
tive to attacking the enemy's ships at their anchorage
near Air Had you commanded the British squa-
dron, the enemy's ships being moored into close and
compact lines, supported by the batteries, and with-
out
any oche!' knowledge of the soundings in the vici-
nity of that anchorage than was possessed by the fleet
previous to the attack on them with fire-ships, wouler
you have gone in to attack him in that position ?
A. Most certainly not, I only mentioned my know-
ledge of the anchorage, in case there was a possibi-
lity of such an event taking place.
• Q. After the two ships that remained at anchor
had got into the entrance of the Charante, and the
Ocean and other French ships which got of the Pa-
lais had obtained the same situation, do you know of
any practicable attempt for destroying them was
omitted to be done ?—A. I was not in shore, there-
fore cannot attempt to say. The Commander in
Chief appeared to have sent every assistance they
possibly could require for that service.
Q. How many ships of the line do you think would
be sufficient to silence the batteries of Isle d'Aix ?
A. I think two would have been quite sufficient.

Q. How many to attack, the ships ?—A. I should 1
think five or six ships of the line, of the smallest
draught of water.
Q. If two had been sent against the batteries, and
five against- the ships, must it not, according to the
common circumstances uf an attack, that many of
those ships would have been crippled, and many men
killed and wounded ?—A. I think by the batteries
there would, but I should conjecture that the French
squadron would make little resistance.
Q. As an attack not proper in itself should not be
made upon the mere conjecture that the resistance
would be weak, what would probably happen to - the

ships if the itieniy had reiisted,?—:A. It is itlipoOlhle.
to foresee what might have happened ; but from the
situation the Fretieh 'Were ht not having tteolded
their fright of the night before: t think the loss would
have been -Very little, •as few of their ships Were in
position to fighi: thE;r guns.
Q. Do you know that the five or six shipi you would
have sent to attack the enemy's ships, would or would
net have been opposed by other batteries than those
he proposed to silence ?—A. From the view ,I had of
the island and its batteries when in shore, I' should
think they would not. I now speak from subiequent
knowledge.
Captain KM again called and t'xaminett
Q- You have stated the injury your ship received
in passing out of the roads of Isle d'Ai x ; can you
state what would be the fate of the Revenge, or any
other 74. gun ship, had they anchored two or three
cables' length, for the purpose of silencing the bat-
teries I should certainly have expected, from
the heavy firing kept up both in going in and coming
out, that ships anchored there must have been com-
pletely dismasted, and suffered a severe loss of men.
Q. What Would have been the probable fate of
those ships, with the wind blowing from the north, as
it did ?—A. If dismasted, in all probability they
must have been last.

Q.. (By the COuhT.) If ships so sent in to at:
tack the batteries of Aix did not, from the strength
of the enemy's works, and the resolution of those who
defended them, succeed in silencing the batteries, and
found it indispensibly Necessary to retire from before
them, could they in a crippled state, with the wind
blowing fresh at-N.N.W. have got to the anchorage
latterly taken up by the Imperieuse,•Pallas, and /Ogle,
have gone to that anchorage under these circumstan-
ces ?—A. If a vessel lo situated had lost her foretnak
she certainly could not have got before the wind, and
without that and having good way, so as to be per-
fectly Cinder command, she must have drifted to the
S. and E. which would have taken her up the Cha-
rante; or 'on the Palais.
Q. -Was the battery on the S. low enough to admit
of its being destroyed by the guns of ships ?7-.-A. On
the S. side I think not, from the S.W. the guns might
have-borne on them. There was one chain of bat-
teries, extending from the W. to the S. side of the
Island.

The COURT, here intimated to Lord asmfittut
that they should hot examine any further evidence,
but if his Lordship had any thing to add, he was at
liberty so to do.
Lord GAMBIFR wished the indulgence of the Court
for a quarter of an hour, to consider whether he should
call more evidence, and then requested that a• paper
he had presented yesterday should be pet mitted to be
entered on the toinntes of their proceedin7s, which was
acquiesced in, and was nearly as follows :
" Mr. PRESIDENT—Arrived at the termination of my defence,
it remains for me to express my acknowledgments to this Hon,
Court, for the patient attention with which it has honoured me.
The space of time cornprehendel in the charge, and more parti•
cularly the riidence of the principal (I might say the only) witnets
on the part of the prosecution, have led mu into detail more dif-
fuse and extensive than I could have apprehended.
" When Lfirst entered this Court, it was with a mind perfectly
at rest as to the issue of my trial, confident of having eaertc-d my-
self to the utmost for the honour and adv.ntage of my Kingand
Country. The result of these proceedings has confirmed me In
this state of mind,

" I now retire, committing to your protection my professional
reputation and my honour, with full persuasion that I shall re-
ceive at your hinds ample retribution for the aspersions on my.
character which has led to this inquiry."
The COURT then acquainted Lord GAMBIER, that
as they should not come to any decision this day,
his Lordship might take until to-morrow to consider
whether he should. offer any further evidence. ,His
Lordship made his acknowledgments for the indul-
gence, and the Court adjourned until ten o'clock
to-morrow—(this day).

A singular occurrence took place at the Carrick-
fergus Assizes. Alexander M'Coy, who was charged
with a rape on Catharine M'Gawly, gave notice of
his intention to surrender himself to the gaoler, and
abide his trial at the present Assizes. Accordingly
he was returned the calendar. On the prisoner
being arraigned, he pleaded as Alexander M'Coy ;
but when about to be given in charge to the Jury, the
Counsel for the Crown mentioned to the Court, that
he understood Alexander M'Coy was not in custody,
but that his brother Daniel had personated him. This
appearing to be the fact, Daniel was ordered to re-
main in custody, and to be prosecuted for the intended
imposition,

UNION-HALL—A curious examination took place
on Wednesday during the examination of a woman on
a charge of bigamy. While the first husband, named
Facia was giving evidence in order to substantiate the
charge against her, a lady, who was in the Office,
rather may a propos for the -witness, came forward and
addressed the Magistrates, as having a claim to his
hand print to his having entered into the holy state
of matrimony with the prisoner. ender these cir-
cumstances the Magistrates thought proper to com-
mit both the witness and the prisoner for trial: The
witness indeed demurred; but the Magistrate observed,
that, having prima facie evidence in the case, he was
deterrair.ed to adhere to his resolution of committing

Yesterday a gentleman of the name of. Bowton was
held to bail, to take his trial for violently striking Mr.
Dodd, jun. the engineer, in the head, so as to cause
a compression on die brain, in a dispute upon the sub-
ject of the Froieeted Vauxhall Bridge.—lt was at first
objected to admit him to bail, the life of Mr. Dodd,
being cons.dered in danger ; but the evidence of some
eminent professional gentlemen not establishing this
fact, bail Was ordered to be taken.
Bow-STREET.--Yesterday J. Nifitot was charged
with hawking and selling six sacks of coals, under a ;
licence made out in the name of J. Lankshear ; which
fact being proved, the licence was ordered to be im-
pounded.
. HATTON-GARDEX.—Yesterciav Mars Preston, who
stands fully committed for robbing a lodging-house
at Hampstead, in which she pretended to -hire apart-
ments for Ladies Somers and Campbell, was charged
by Mr. Delacourt, of the sign of the Earl of Chatham,
at Woolwich, with practising a similar deception on
him, and robbing his house of sheets and wearing sip-
' payeL —She was remanded, in expectation of more
•
charges of a similar nature.
Satdrday, J. Hill, a carter, while contending with
another carman who should first unload their goods
in the Borough Market, was run over by one of the
carts, and had his legs broken,

• fy tit 2 :EDiroit 0747111 St* - •

ON THt PROPHECIES.-NO. ZYYItt. . •

INTRODUCTIoN To Tan WOE TRUMPETS.
lad I beheld, and heard are eagle tng ihrovgh the
mid.heaven, saying with a load voice, a, woe, won
to the dweller: on the earth, from' the other voice: of the
trtaroet of Me. three assgeh who are get le. soma "
(Rev. viii. 13.)
We hale seen, by the trumpets of the foe!. fbrmer
angels, evils brought upon the church and upon the- -
empire of DANIEL'S fourth kingdom, than which ima-
gination can scarcely canceive any thing more dread-
ful. 't'hese, however, terrible as they were, are consi- .
dered as light and trivial, compared to those that
follow. They are therefore detailed in the prophecy
without any particular intimation of their peculiar
severity ; but those about to be proclaimed are intro-
duced with a wattling awfully solemn,' whether' we
consider the heaven here mentioned as referring to the.
rule and government of the church, or to that system
of dominion which was to take place in Europe after
the imperial sun was eclipsed. WoE, WOE, WOE to
the inhaZitant: of the earth P' That the church is called
upon to attend to this warning cannot ,be doubted ;
for the Whole prophecy was given to chew unteenetst's
servant: things that were :hardy to come to pass (Rev. i.
1.) But the h.eavew-politie appears to be here particularly
intended ; for the fourth trumpet had proclaimed the
extinction of the light of the third part of this heaven,
and then follows this Eagle in the mid-heaven, ?Aar:it/pa-
sr,y.z:i, (not- Mr midst of heave", as in the common
version) denouncing three-fold woe to the inhabiter: bf
the earth, i. e. to those dwelling under the politica/ •
heaven. This phrase, d mid-heaven," does not mean
the air, the Middle region between heaven and earth,
but the meridian, that part of the heaven in which the
sun has his highest exaltation-in his [apparent] dint.
nal revolution, and in- the astronomy-of the ancients
always meant, that point or degree of the Zodiac
which coincided with the meridian, whether the sun
was then in that point or bot. The mid-heaven was
also.called the cusp of the tenth astronomical house—
for the whole Zodiac was considered as divided auto
twelve planetary houses—and this tenth house, being
the highest, was allotted to the sun, a; Mr King among
the planets. Hence this was called the regal house,
the house cr rule and dominion, and in astrology denoted
the ruling power.
In the common Greek text we read titylAa, Angr4
in place of sikroii, Eagle. The latter is the reading •
of the Velgate, Syriac and Jr!Ethiopic versions, the
Complutensian edition,
_several of the Fathers and
good MSS. and by every rule of fair criticism has
the best right to be admtted as the genuine text.
One of the readings is a corruption. It is difficult to
conceive how a transcriber could substitute Eagle
for the former word having occurred only
once before in the whole beef, and that so far back
as chapter iv. vet. 7, so that the recollection of the
word cannot be suppOsed to have been floating
even faintly in his mind when transcribing the Sth
chapter. It is otherwise with the word angel. No
mstake could be more natural when •writing about
Heaven, than to substitute for eagle a word of such
frequent recurrence as angel.*
It is also deserving of notice, that Jam; does not
say siniply as Eagle, but ivos eiersO, est. Eagle.—
An Engle in symbolical language is sovereignty, and
was peculiarly the symbol 9f the Roman sovereignty.
But the Prophet had given a statement, in the verse
immediately preceding, which, without such an. inti-
mation as is here given, might have been understood
to amount to a declaration that the eagle was dead.
The Eagle, however, or the Beast, as this Empire is
also called, recovered from the wonnd inflicted en
him by the sword of the barbarians.. The Hierarchy
still remained as a nucleus and centre around which
the discordant and heterogeneous materials of which
this empire was now composeti, were to arrange them-
selves, and by which such a cohesion of them was to
be fontied as can subsist among pieces of iron joined
together by such cement as clay (Dan. ii. 40-43).
The Eagle had yet an existence in prospect : the
reign of one head, its eighth, was to follow all the
calamities that had been before described ; and the
appearance of this one form of the Eagle in Me mid-
heaven—that if, in the possession of the sovereign power
—his own annunciation of his existence, his assump-
tion of dominion as a ruler, is in the text declared to
be equivalent to a denunciation of the most dread-
ful miseries to mankind.
But besides this, something farther seems to be in-
timated by the peculiar expression, ONE mgt."
It was not a plurality of empires, or any potentate,
whom commentators, to suit their own hypoth!sis,
might choose to upbraid with the title, but own par-
ticular predicted em re, that was to be the distingo .b-
-ed and prominent adversary of the Messimes king-
dom, and, as such, the procuring cause of the judi.
cial inflictions denounced in this prophecy. This de.
serves particular notice ; for we are by this limita-
tion to ON E, prevented from looking. for this adver-
sary, the Antichrist, in any other empire than that of
the Eagle; and had commentators paid proper atten-
tion to this limitation, they would have suppressed
many of their ISICUbMions, which are worse than ir-
relevant.
Another dominion was to succeed that of the Em.
peror's, and like the later part of them, to call itself
Christian—a power which was to profess to Itilateits--,
conduct by the precepts of the gospel. very
power, though thus warned, was to be the cause of all
the evils that were to follow ; for though the chief in-
struments wcre to be another set of men, of whom we
shall soon have occasion to take notice, these had no
power of their own, nor ought they ever to have pos-
sessed it, in civil matters.; but. they received power
from the ten kings, and bad their rise as a
called by Paul the man of sin—the son of perdition (2
Thess. ii. 3.), at the same time sv,tlt the ten
(r,ev. evil. 12, 13). They had, as we have aisendy
seen, been gradually strengthening thenteelvez and
adding to their own importincemenfronathe Apostolic
age, but it *as only on the seduction of the imperial
power, which was the.fel or Madrona to, the complete-
r revelation of the mystery of iniquity which was al%
ready at work in the days of the Apostles, that the
nun of riesscendedilis throw; sates:tied machiaationt,
with all tr, astil rive mod wader:. The na-
ture of delmions, and judgments which fol-
lowed, fatty the subjects or the. three following trum-
peu. But, at it will much facilitate our future pro-
° Some :lad apirov isc brio. See.Orierbastes Testa.wris . vol.tio.

:* •

~~ ,

*.%