Star.
London, England, 1802-02-20 00:00:00

PORTSMOUTH, FEB. 19.

Arrived from Cork the Minerva, Capt. Cows's,
from Egypt, (laft from Cork), with troops on
board; alfo the /Olive; Moac An , with timber from
Cheptiow. On Wednefday lait arrived the Earl
St. Vincent, Hurrou, from the Downs bound to
Jamaica. Arrived this day the George and Ann,
from London bound to Limerick the Harry, J.
Baits, from Guernfey with wines Portf*outh
and Southampton ; and the John and Elidrabetli,
Dizos, from London with beans for Poole,

LA" livetztuctiveL

. ~

,

SPRING cir.currs OF THE JUDGEIt,
MIDLAND.—...Lord li:cf,Baron and Baron Graham.
Monday. March,t, at Northampton.
Friday, March 3, at Oakham.
Saturday, March 6,: at Lincoln and City.
Thurfday, March is, it Nottingham and Town.
Saturday, March 13, wt Derby.
Thurfday, March 18, it Lekefter and .Borough.
Tuefday, Match 23, at COlReatry and Warwick.
o:roam—Baron Thompfon and niftier Chambra.
Monday, March 1, at fteadind-
Wednefday, March 3, at Oxford.
Saturday. March 6, at Worcefter and City.
Wednefday„ March to, at Oloucefter and City.
Saturday, March t 3, at Monmouth.
Tuefday, March t 6, at Hertford.
Saturday, March 20, at Shrewfbury.
Thurfday, March 25, at Stafford.
Noavntaw.—Lord Kenyon and Juftke Rooke.
Saturday, March 6, at York and City.
Saturday, March so, at Lancafter.
Noarotx.—Lord Alvanky and.Jultice Grofe.
Saturday, March 6, at Arefbury.
Thurfday, March ix, at Bedford.
Saturday, March 13, at Huntingdon.
Wednefday, March ty, at Cambridge.
Saturday, March so, at Thetford.
Thurfday, March 1,5, at Bury St. Edmunds.
Wait sair..--jultice Lawrence and Juftice Le Blanc.
Tuefday, March 9, at Wincheiter.
Saturday, March r 3, at Sarum.
Thurfday, March 18, at Dorchefter.
Monday, March as, at Exeter and City.
Saturday, March 27, at Launcefton.
Thurfday, April t, at Taunton.

COURT OF CHANCERY, FEBRUARY 19.

DRURY•LkNE THEATRE.
The Lost) CHANCELLOR faid, that althouh the
propofed final fsttlement had been duly tranfmitted
to him, there was ttill one piece of information of
which he was not in poffeifion, namely, the claim,
of thofe who had not figned the truft deed to Mr.
I Adam; and as he• might find himfelf obliged to
make fuch an ordro as would exclude fuck from
the benefit of that deed, he thought it right to
give them notice, and a few days more time. The
final determination was accordingly fixed for Wei-
nefday.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER, FEB. Esp.
THE KING O. REDDINGTON.
This was an information againit the defendant,
filed by his Majelly's Attorney-General for a
breach of the Excite Laws. By feveral Statutes
all perfons are prohibited from carrying on con-
jointly the trades of tanner and currier. Before
the tanned hides are can led to be cut up they mull
pay a confiderable duty, and be Ramped by thz
escifeman. When the tanning and currying are
concluded by the fame perfon great facilities are
given to the evafion of this duty; and therefore.
the pradice is prohibited, under the penalty of
the forfeiture of all the hides fo dreffed, and a hi.;ll
pecuniary fine. With a breach of this law the de-
fendant was Charged ; and Coon after the opening
of the cafe by Sir-Edward Law, he contented that
a verdid thould pats againfi him for 6001.
The Court was employed the rell of the day in
tryisug THE KING V. ELLIOTT AND ANOTHER.
wnicS was a writ of extent. The defendants are
afiignees of a bankrupt, who carried on a gl.rfs-
, manufaeory in Radcliff-Highway. The quellion
was merely, whether Mr. Home was in part-
nerfhip with Mr. Metcalf, in whore name the
glafs-work was entered ? That a debt exifted to
the Crown was not denied, and the trial was un-
, commonly tedious and uninteretting.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, FEB. x 9.
TAYLOR V. T 5313.
This was an anion againft the Defendant fel'
giving falfe reprefentations of the circumftances ct
one Stubbins, by which the Plaintiff was induced
to give him credit; and he not proving iblvent,
the Plaintiff brought the prefent aftion to recovtr
the fum of 701. which was due to him from Stub-
bins.

The declaration Rated, that the Plaintiff and
Defendant were both Curriers and Leather-fellers,
and that the latter fraudulently intending to de-
ceive the former, made falfe reprefentations of the
folvency of one Stubbins. The declaration then
went on more minutely to Rate, that the Plaintiff
heat his fervant to the Defendant to enquire the
' cbaraiter of Stubbins, and that he, in anfwer to
!Itch enquiry, laid, Stabbins was one of his bell
[Cuflomers • that he.fhould be forry to lofe him,
for he took fuch goods as he could not otherwife
conveniently difpofe of, and that the reafon why
Stubbins dealt elfewhere was, that his, the Defen-
dant's, circumßances, were too limited to give.
him the credit he wanted. In the fecond count it
Rated the Defendant reprefented, that when 1..!
wanted money, he drew upOn Stubbins, who Ile-
I cepted his bills, which were regularly paid. . It
then went on to aver; that on the faith of thefe 7c-
prefentationithe Plaintiff entrußed the Defendant.
The material witnefs, to prove the fags was `a
fervant of the Plaintiff's, of the name of Payne :
He Rated that Stubbins applied to them in April,
and referred to Tebbs for his chars ter. He wa,
feat to Tebbs, and made the neceffary engoi. :
when the Defendant told him, " that StublAn.
:was one of his belt cultomers, for that he teak
goods he could not well otherwife difpofe of, anti
etat he thould be forry to loft him ; but he could
not, from his limited capital, give him credit to
the extent he wanted." The witnefs, however,
did not prove the fecond part of the declaration,
as to the drawing and payment of the bills. '
Stubbins hirafelf was alfo examined. He flatt,l
that Tebbs knew the whole of his tireuniflatir,- ;
that he had but little capital ; but as Teb-, h4ti
promifed to affiß him, he hoped to do well en h
trade, efpecially as he had fome expeaancies ft( re.
a relation; but that, in point of fad, lie could 1,, c
have gone on without aliiilance from fome 0,11. i ;.:, .
The Defendant :recommended him to dr..l ,
'with the Plaintiff, and gave him a character.--
The defendant alfo always gave him credit 1'
finch s as he wanted, and never refufedlo 1:t
him goods
goods when he had them; and after
.the time he recommended him to the plaintiff. I,e
'trulled him-with upwardsinf tool worth. He 1, IA
'accepted bills froM the defendant when they er-ilr
'eOther, and if he could not nay Arm when I:..tv