Star.
London, England, 1806-04-29 00:00:00

PARLMMENTART PRvCEED.'AGS.

HOUSE OP LORDS, MONDAY, APRIL 22
The I.ecc,cool. Exchequer Bills Bill, the Tea Duty Bill, the
left' Bank Note Bill, and the IriOt Houle Tax Repeal Bill, paired
through Coiontittces, and were reported.
Earl GREY (late Lord Grey) was introduced between the Earl
of Suffolk and the Earl of Raslyn. His Patent of Creation
haying been read at the Table, his Lordihip took the oaths and
his fat.

Mr. WHITBREAD and feveral otters, Members of the Houfe
of Commons, brought up a Magee. containing& further Lift of
Witneffes to be examined on the Trial of Lord Vircount Mel-
ville.

Mr. ALEXANDER, Sir R. VAUGHAN, Lord STANLEY,
Mr. ES I'COURT, and fevers' other Members of the Houfe of
Commons, brought op the Cottony' Duty Bill, the Tobacco and
Snuff Duty lEl43nd fevcralprivate Bills, which were fewerally read
a firft time.

Earl SPENCER prefented the Firft Report of the Commlffic
nera for rcvlOng and digeßing the Civil Affairs of the Navy, which
was ordered to be priutrd.

IMPRACHMINT OF LORD msLvit.t.E.

Lord AUCKLAND made a motion to the following effeet

Refo!red, that this Houle do Aridly prohibit the 1,011
" cation of all Proceedings on the Impeachment of Ler., \ic:•
" vine"

The puke of NORFOLK asked if there was any preeedeot for
Fuchs motion
Lerd AUCKLAND rep!! in the negative; hot argued that
futh a regulation waa called for by rearm' anti jollier, Sa nous*/
could be more unJutt thy) that ao er /mitt il4tentent !!wild go
forth to the world, whi nor ht eventually he completely ante/a.
ad, but which, in the inemi time, during the progrefa of the trial,
might create a very unfavourable Insprdlen allatuft the
Indivi-
dual seeded.

Lord ELDON concurred entirely in opinion with the Noble
Lord as to thepropriety and Jul/item' withholthng from the pub-
lic. during a trial, Rah:melds wading to eftabh.h an apparent
guilt, although the individual secured might be enabled to prove
Ms innocence. and ultimately be acquitted. He th,olght. bow•
ever. that by the terms of the motion. the publication of the trial
would be precluded after its coodulion, which, of courfe, was
not 'mended.

Lord HAWKESBURY alio concurred is the objedt of the
motion, hut whited to Inf:rt the word,. In order to 111Vcrid any pro-
hi bidets of the publieJtlon of the trial 3 tree ttsconelnflart.
The LORI) CHANCPI.LOR limed, that through miltake, in
coming the motion, the words " dui iog the fame" ►ad been kit

After tome further couverfithin, the mod in, thus amended,
1401db:tine the publieeeion of the proceedings during the trael,
was agrced to
Lori MICICLe.kNn :afterward.; made two Motions for reins-
tating the detirety of Ticiuts for the Trjst. according to which,
thole Veers awls were to be twined to Tickets, who were Mem-
ber. of the Houle.

The Duke of NORFOLK thought there would be a hardibto
retaking from this to a few Peer. who had not taken their Geis,
sod whn would be thereby eteluded from having ticket*. He there.
i fore movvdto fubititute that Mote Peers Mould have tickets who
were entitled to feats In the Heufe.
• Some emoterfation tolled between Lord AUCKLAND, hoed
HAWKEStaRY, and the Duke of NORFOLK, hfcer which
the arnimdment war negatived, and the original motion carried
ILord ELDON adverted to the Nip:a which he mentionnt on
Friday, ready. to that part of the Report log the Cere..l
' monfalrto be °brayed on the Trial of loardirostot Stelellie, 1
which fluted t! nut , oa i icing jivigmmt, each Peer Was to by—.
t....ci:ty," or " Not Uuitty, iii..,n my honour." His Ueda* I

0t,j.,1...1 to the term juelesnott, which certainy did not apply
.1.. t pruceedirc which weft he fettled by vote of the'
I lonfr, acc,irdirg to the I them, of ClMlttlit. or riot Colt*
*too," and the Itiegment *n he deli...rol by their Spenta. He
thought font. t•rr mode timid be adopted. of Rating that part of
the tertoonoial to which be objeCted, and he therefcee moved to
rifcind It, in order to futiftituiq on a future day, fame other form
more 'pal:lgoe, to the reel nature of the proceeding.
Esti eorrurred in the ohjeedion made by. the Noble
and I.c:irtted Lord. Although the form ufed In the ceremonial
was conformable to precedent, It was certainly inconflftent with
the nature of the proceeding defignated. fuch proceeding being
more to the nature of a verdidt than giving judgment. He argued
an the propriety of refeindine that part of the ceremonal,and af-
terwards deviling tome other mode of !toting the form.
The motion was agreed UN—Adjourned till to-morrow (this
day).