Star.
London, England, 1801-05-29 00:00:00

•
try, that when a Gentleman pays a particular at
tendon to a Lady, he has a gallant conueaion with
her. Mr. Wyndham had conleired he palled the
eight with Bartell in bed, in the fining of t 795.
This converfation occurred when returning Iron,
the baths at Lucca.
John Dunn, the latt and principal evidence,fak
w he went to Florence in a 785 with Lord Hervey,
where he had afterwards remained.. He remem-
bered the arrival of Lord Wycombe in July;
1794; he went into the fervice of Sir Godfrey
Webfler, whore houfe was next door to the kefi.
dent's, and continued with him a year and a half,
till he left Italy, when he (lopped with Lord Hol-
land, who from that time appeared to be attached
to Lady Wekiler, and it was notorious a connec-
tion fubilfled between them. After the,conneaion
was notorious between Lady Airebfter and Lord
Holland, the plaintiff int:aimed his wife to their
patty ; the was contlantly with them, and
every one thought it WAS impotlible it could be
without the plaintiff's knowledge and approbation.
Lady Webtler, Lord Holland, Mrs. Wyndham,
and Lord Wycombe, were always of the fame par-
ty, and the plaintiff generally dined with them. Af-
ter dinner, he ufed to leave his company at the
houfe of Embaffy, and frequent other ladies. The
Lady he firtt was in the habit of vifiting was Ma-
dame Bartell. Mrs. Wyndham and Lady Web-
Rer went out an airing in their carriage, and the
plaintiff and Madame Bartoli in a phaeton. The
Witnefs Rot only took novice of his concha& but it
was remarked by the whole town. At fiat every
one thought Mrs. Wyndham was a very prudent
Lady, pitied her fituatioa, and blamed the plain-
tiff for ufing her fo ill, as he. did by ?eating herand
going to other women. Madame Bartoli was a
merchant's wife at Leghorn i • ilie was quite the re-
verie of a difcreet woman, infaa, the wasa woman
of pleafure. The Lady who fucceeded her in the
atfeQiorts of the plaintiff was ,a Madame Mari, a
raarri..ed woman too, with whom he became ac-
quainted at Pifa ; he conduaed her about pub-
licly in the fame way he had done Madame IBar.
tali; he took a honk for her at Florence, which
he furnifhed with the furniture of the bottle of Em-
hairy, in which his wife liNd. •
Mr. GARROW—This Madame Mari ivas a rao-
dell woman perhaps?—A. Quite the reverie.
Q Was fhe a loofe fith, as my learned friend
terms it ?—A. He took her away from two men
who kept her at the time time.
Lord Kaarrox—" Upon my word this is tee
much."
Mr. Gmtatow-.--Was there any man in all Flo-
rence whofe gallantries were more offenfive than
Mr. Wyndham?—A. In the eyes of the Englifh
not one.

Q._ Soon after the arrival of Lord Wycombe did
you obferve his attentions to Mrs. Wyndham ?
A 4 Not at firit.
Q After Tome time did you obferve a grossing
attaament between them?—A. He generally at-
tended her every day.
Q If he had not, perhaps fhe would have been
unattended?—A. Certainly.
qt. Was it podible for Mr. Wyndham to doubt
the gtlNing attachment between his wife and the
defendant ?—A. Impable.
Q Did you ever fee any. of there parties at the
Opera?—A. Every night Mr. Wyndham accom-
panied Madame Mari.
The ATTORNIT GsnaaAL—l certainly have
fame oppofition to this witne(s, who is a dilcarded
fcrvant, not of one but of feveral mailers, for atis
of difhonefly; but having heard the opinion of your
Lordfhip on the former part of the cafe, I think it
bell to be nonfuited.
Accordingly the Plaintiff was nonfuited.

PERJUIY.-THI WING V. WILKES.
This was an indi&ment againft the Defendant
for Fsrjury, in his anfwer to a Bill filed againft him
in the Court of Exchequer. It appeared that Mr.
Wilkes had agreed with a Mr. Sydney for the ex-
clufive pfinting of a work entitled the Eitylepeetsa
Lontinertlie, and another called the Zoolozial Maga-
titer, which contrad *as alledged not to have been
fulfilled in the manner defcribed in the Defendant's
affidavit. The flatement of the tranfadion between
there parties would be tedious and uninterefting.
After hearing three witneffes, and feveral letters
being read, none of the eight affignments in the in-
. diEtnaent being proved, the Jury without any hell-
tation, argiritied tae Defoulard.

Ol.n.Beitsv.—Wednefdayeleven pviConers were
tried, (even of whom were conviEled offelony, and
four were acquitted. Same day judgment of death
was paired 'upon the followingsprifoners, vie.
Mary Parrots, Mate h Payne, Robert Mee. Thomas •
Hainfoo, Thomas Green, George Reeves, Thomas Johnßone,
John. Smith alias Parker, RiehArd Wright, Michael Stewart
Michaelalw -
rant, Richard Hall, John Maigens, Noah Gordon, Thomas •
lone', William Connack, Dennis Kennedy, and David White.
Yellerday there being no prifoners to try the
Court paired fentcnce en thole prifoners oho were
c mviEted of felony, viz..
Wiliam Dkldna, Janice Purnell, Samuel Perron, Samuel
Peary. Mary Keen,Cat benne Clark, William Wood, Catherine
Jerba,Richatd Prauris, John Laurence George Parrot, John
1113pharthaWilliam Mstpham, Thomas jaws Davis,
William-Sbmnentli. Thomas Plumb, John Toueldield, John
Smith. Thomas May, Henry May.Sertfarntn waterloos, Mary
Ann Boyle, James Starkey, Thomm Collett alias Pany,Charles
aolicio, John Carponer alias Carter alias Can, were feverally
entered to be truitperted for the teem at 7 years.
Mary Hayes was ordered to be teantpotted far 14 ygars.
seven were onleresi to be impriConad in Newpte.
Seventeen were ordered to be imprifoncd In the Houle of
Corredion at Cleritenwell.
tlevas were ordered to be publicly whipped, and
Light were ordered to be privately Whipped.
Amon It the prifoners to be imprifoned in New.
gate, Edward Kay Edwarrds is to Rand in the.
pillory for one hour near Cable-flreet, in Holborn,
during the fir* two months of his imrrifonment.
The Segions being then ended, the fame were
adjourned until Wednefday the JR day of July next.
Of the twenty-one malefation, who received
fentence of death at the IA affixes at Lancaller,
eleven have been executed, and there are two
others whole fate is not yet known. The others
have been pardoned.
On Tuefday fe'nnight, Robert Robertfoi, found
guilty of horfe-Realing, at the laa Circuit Court
held at Jedburgh. WAS caccutcd in that town.

• . . ,
The , I.efAtip.3.l4e4o
Ad, Nue:We% ralf..`y, flirettletiries and Palos nr the- Btu-
mackwill find an of remedy in W n a F., SKRIC
holus.ranci, sloe hey hequently Oeconled ia•cares tha:
had baffled every Wu/ ns,,thotl, and malts cirentuftmices that
precluded every captdlatiottpflira from the titans ufoally
prcfcfflkay. It is prepar.d.ir Pi*, and alto in a &MI Rate.-
1 Pills are an verifier! storoehie, Particularly ferwiceallle
it; Flatultnciea and lodigee hot: and by their falatary mode oi
operation, (Mien:lWe perforation) they gradually undermine
the molt ohfUnate Rhemdlint and .:her complaints, :uvlat the
fame time Invigorate the debilitated confittution. The Fluid
Erence is a tvn,arkaitly naive embrocation, nee,ffarile ufcd
with the Pills • and as it genera/ excites a tingling ftnfation,
even in the deepeft Rated marks, it removes the caufe of
pain, by bringing on a proper circulation in the part. By this
means, the fevercit Sprains and Bruifes, old Strains and Re-
latatiOns, are frrimaitly cured by a few app/I,ations. In ner-
vous Nrad-aclts4l,lorA•ds itiltactatseous relief; and by the
fuggeftion of fevetaitWes of dirließion, Mt tom mt yr° at pre-
pares it, for the auseenniodation of the affluent, equally grate-
ful as the Honey of Lavender Waters ; lb this nate it can onl)
be had at his hnufe, No. Ts, Oreck-ftreet, Soho, London, in
larger fined bottles, at tea. 6d. each.-.:The genuine is diftitt-
guifhed from counterfeits by the IZing's Patent, and the Ova-
ture of R. Jo UN Yr om on the labh: of each box or bottle. It
may be had, at Ts. pd. each, of every reputable Medkine Vett-
der in the three kingdoms, Welt Indict, and America. To
prevent counterfeit impontion, the dlaingurbing marks of the
genuine arenocciforg to be weeded to.