Star.
London, England, 1825-03-04 00:00:00

1.

t_
h
C
d

d

144
44

by their Protest fellow-subjects,. and that thenGrea•
Britain might bid iiiiWetto Is wiensies; and attend only to the
preservation of its own libertiermttleh no one else seemed to regard.
Lord CA R BEIM/ said; that the. Cdthntie-Msocia-
deo' had 'assumed Unee ten al authority, antilhiiefoie it ought
to put an end .to'.—Lord Gaosvarroa explained.
The Earl of K INGSTON rose, briefly' to correct a
mistatarrent which had been made by a •Noble Lord'
(Lord Liverpool), relative to the seizure of some cattle,
bi tsy Of &Sink, for the nonlayntent of Catholic War.'
The Marquis of ' LANSDOWN considered the
statement just made by a Noble Lord was proof that
the House were in the dark *upon the real conduct of
the Roman CathOlic :Association. It was' in itself suf-
ficient to induce their Lordships to make inquiry. The
Noble Marquis, on the general subject before the House,
*as convinced that the state of the Catholics of Ireland
reqUired the consideration of Parliament.. He was
bound to look to the provisions of the Bill; and ask
hirtt-
+self whether, if it were passed, it would be a remedy
Tor the existing evil ?; He was bound to conclude that it
'would be ineffectual. He • did not find there was any
intention to put down meetings of the Roman Catholics
of Ireland. On the subject of Rent, he would say it
was impossible to prevent money from being given and
received. The purposes of the Catholic religion could
not be carried on without subscription, and it was int-
possible to stop it. Without troubling the House on
the object of the law, he was justified in contending,
that the evil they attempted to defeat, would not be de-
feated. The toot of the evil was in the state of society
in Ireland. The people of Ireland were denied the
rights of the Constitution, and mixed as they had been
with•those who did enjoy all the privileges of the Con-,
stitution, expressions of disappointment and 'displeasure
would naturally break out. The heart would feel and
the pulse beat—it was vain to expect tranquillity_ in
that unfortunate country, until the cause of complaint
is removed. A' people equal to any upon the face. of
the earth, claimed a share in tha benefits afforded by a
free Constitution. They might be described in the lan-
guage of Milton, who said-46 Think ye, Lords and
tommons, what it is you are to govern—a nation not
equalled on earth, acute to invent, subtle in conversa-.
tion, and not void of capacity to accomplish any ob-
ject." Such are the people of Ireland, and the Noble
Marquis called upon the House to redress their com-
plaint. Instead of enacting additional restrictions upon
the Roman Catholics of Ireland, it was most desirable
that they should remove those causes of irritation and
discontent of which no man could deny the existence,
and which he and his friends knew were to be met with'
at every corner. It was not by penal or restrictive sta-
tutes that their Lordships could hope to reduce the
distemper of which they complained. Penal enact-
ments would be worse than useless—(Hear). He would
say of these enactments, in the language of our im-
mortal Bard :

The elements
Of which your swords are tempered, may as well
Wound the loud winds, or with bemock'd-at stabs,
Kill the still closing waters!"—(Cheers.)
He had heard, even within the last forty-eight hours,
hopes held out to the Irish Roman Catholics. He
trusted that those hopes would have a healing influence
on their minds, and prevent the further expression of
angry feeling on their parts. He could not sit down
without expressing his sincere belief, and he hoped it
might reach. the Roman Catholic body, that many
Members, both in that and the other House, who, from
mistaken views, voted for the present Bill, were, not-
withstanding, the most zealous friends of Catholic
Emancipation—(Hear). He said this, because he
wished the Roman Catholics to 'continue their confi-
dence in the men, who, upon that question, had uni-
formly advocated their cause—(Hear, hear). He
now entertained the hope that the restoration of the
rights of the Roman Catholics would be restored, and that
in a manner most valuable to themselves, and at the same time
most palatable to their brother Protestants. Entertaining this
!type, be did not intend to be so pettinadous in his opposition to this
measure as be was otherwise indined to be ; and he was the less in.
cased to be so, inasmuch as be hoped that the BM, if passed, world
never be acted uposs, but would be superseded by a measure as well
of justice as of wise and liberal and conciliatory policy—(Hear).

The Earl of HARROWBY supported the Bill.—
What would be the state of Ireland with a rival Parlia-
ment? He wished the Bill to pass, because it was the dutrof Par•
fitment to provide for the trauquillity of Ireland. The Noble Bari
was also desirous of passing this Bill, because it was necessary for
the benefit of the Roman Catholics themselves. The Catholics ought
to rejoice that they bad an opportunity of proving, that although
they had been misled, they were still kip), and ready to submit to
the law. That conduct would shew that they were entitled to
putleipate in the blessings of the Constketiom
The House then divided—.
Content
Not Content

. -
Majority for the "coed Reading —lO2
The Bill was accordingly reed a second that, and the house ad-
journed at TwaLva o'CLocc.

HOUSE OF COMMON&
INGLISH AND BRISTOL CUANNEL3 801? CANAL.
Sir T. LETHBRIDGE obtained leave to bring in a
Bill for making a Ship Canal Irani the English Chan-
nel to the Bristol Channel. It was brought in and road a first
claw. On the Illation that it be read a second rinse,
Sir T. LLTHBRIDGE said, he wished to state
only to the House the nature and objects of the Bill.
The project of connecting the Bristol Channel with the
English Channel had been undertaken by men who
were perfectly aware of the great flatland advantage
of the measure. It was a speculation which was not
likely to fail for want of the means to carry it into exe-
cution, and could not be classed with those delusive
projects of which they daily heard mention, and which
were, in his view, highly injutions to the community. at
large. Tbe sum required was 2,000,0001. and the
whole of that stun had been subscribed. The
Canal would pass through a line of country, IP7)/axrrd
of
which was poor land, but the reit very riche The pro-
perty to bs pargbased for this purpose belonged to
1000 different persons • of these 918 -had been applied
to, (nit of which number only 50 were opposed to the
project. IR would pass rpugh or near severs) towns,'
and would, tberefere, be productive of much lOCRI ps
well as stational advantage. The Channel (which
would receive

ing trade, and thereby in part remove the nursery of
our 'aloft who'now acquired skilVand experience in the difficult.
naviption.round the Land'o'Faid7 thought, besides, that die`
can */ atilditirbadrvermitdot be coMmucted for C2,000,t)04.‘
Sit T. LETHBRIDGE mid, that the canal could not lessen,
our coasting trade, as no vessel could tiominence or terminate her
voyage in it; every ship would Ibeeefideireqoire in lter sea voyage
the same number Ofseilors as before.- With respect to the cameo%
the original estimate was £1,17.5,000." Estimates were not always
correct; it wii, hoviever, Calculated that two millions would cover
the whole expense. But whether it cost two millions or three
millions was of little importance, when its general national advan-
tages were taken into consideration.
'Ms Petition was ordered to be read a second time.
Mr. S. RICE presented a Petition from Drogheda, in favour of
the Liverpool Railway'
Mr. C. CA LVERT presented several Petitions from St. John's
Parish, against the South London Water Works Bill.
Mr. A BERCROM BY presented a Petition front Leith against
the Leith Dock Bill.—Read and laid on the table.
The London and Manchester Equitable Loan Bill was' read the
first time.
The Metropolitan Fish Company's Bill was read a first time on
the motion of Lord Joint Frrzecer.
' Mr. Alderman THOMPSON presented a Petition from the
Ward of Cheap, in favour of the London Water Works Bill.
The Marquiswf Taws:our was ordered to be discharged from
the custody of the Setjeant at Arms, on payment of his fees.
Lord Gaavis was ordered to be discharged from the custody of
the Serjeant at Arms, and his absence to be excused without pay-
ment of fees.
• Lied LINDSAY presekted a Petition from Wigan, for the re-
peal of the Assessed Taxes.
Me. DICKINSON presented a Petition from Somerton, for the
repeal of the House and Window Duties; also a Petition from
Glastonbury, in favour of the County Courts Bill; also a Petition
from South Brant, for the repeal of the Assessed Taxes.
Mr. /3AWSON presented a Petition from Dublin, in favour of
Provincial Banks; and a similar Petition from Londonderry.
31r: H. DAVIS presented a Petition from St. Stephen's, Bristol,
for the repeal of the House and Window Duties. On the motion
of the same Gentleman, a return of tobacco and snuff which had
paid the duty up to the 24th of October last, was ordered.
Mr. C. CALVERT presented a Petition from St. Saviour's,
Southwark, for the repeal of the Assessed Taxes.
Mr. BROUGHAM thought the doctrine of taking off Indirect
taxes, was carried a little too far. The relief was not so imme-
diate to the public. The next day after the duty of £l6 a tun was
taken off French wines, he was at Guildhall, and he there heard that
the wine-dealers had raised French wines £lO a tun.
Sir R. WILSON said, the same advance todk place on !withal,
when the leather tax was taken off.—The Petition was then read,
and laid on the table.
Mt. D. BROWN presented a Petition-from the Noblemen and
Gentlemen of Ireland, in favour of Provincial Banks.
Sir W. INGILBY presented a Petition from Holbeach, for the
repeal of Assessed Taxes.
Captain 31 ABERLY presented a Petition from Northampton,
favour.of the County Courts Bill.
Mr. HU ME presented a Petition from. Londonderry, in favour
of the Catholic Association ; which, after a few words from Sir G.
law., was read, and laid on the table.
Mr. HUME begged to move to discharge the notice of audios
admire to the Irish Church, in consequence of the progress and
state of the question as to Catholic Emancipation, till the 10th
of March; and on that day to substitute in lieu of it, the Motion
far dispensing with the Sinking Fund.
A Message from the Lords Informed the Rouse, that they had
rued the Exchequer Bills Bill.
Mr. BROWNLOW presented a Petition from the Protestants
of
Ireland, praying for an opportunity to offer a justification of the
character of the Orange Association of Ireland before they
Imre dissolved.
Lord ALTHORPR was glad to hear the declaration of the
Honourable Member, that the Orange Association was to be con-
sidered as extinct. •
Mr. ABERCRO M B Y concurred' in the congratulation of his
Noble Friend, at hearing from the Honourable Member, that the
'Orange Associations might be considered at an end. He had no
' objection to the Petition being laid before the Committee up stairs,
If the Orange Associations thought it necessary.
Mr. Secretary PEEL said, that whatever were the op.
position to the Catholic claims which he had made and
should make, there was no man in the House heard
with greater satisfaction than he did the declaration of
his Honourable Friend,, that the Os ange Associations
are at an end. He did not call in question their loyalty,
but the principles on which' they were confederated
together were objectionable. Many of the persons connected with
Government had been Members of these Associations, to mo-
derate their sentiments, and to prevail on the Associations to dis-
solve themselves.
Mr. ABEItCROMBY was glad to have heard the
explanation of the Right Honourable Gentleman, which be thought
was absolutely required.
After a few words from Mr. BaowiLow and Lord ALMOST&
the Petition was read, and referred to the Committee in the
State of Ireland.
Mr. A BERCROMBY presented a Petition front Bandon, in
favour of the Catholic Association.
Mr. M. FITZGERALD presented two Petitions from Killain,
on* me— rry, against the Bill for putting down the Catholic Association..
MA BROUGHA M brought in the Apothecaries' Regulation
111111, wadi was read a first time, sad ordered to be read the second
date tweaerrow. He noticed u misrepresentation which had gone
abroad of what be bad said en the occasion when be gave nodes
of this Bill. He had been stated to have said something disrespect-
ful of the proceedings of Trinity College, Dublin, respecting their
practice as to Diplomas, than which nothing was farther from
his intention.
Mr. CROKER said, the Honourable and Learned Gentleman
had certainly said nothing against the Edinburgh, Glasgow, or
Trkairy Colleges.
Mr.. HUME said, be believed the University of Aberdeen was
about to make a regulation to remove the stigma which at present
was faxed on them.
Mr. MA BERLY presented a Petition from the parish of Mary-
la.iseasse, in favour of the repeal of the whole of the Assessed Taxes.
ASSZSSED TAXES.
_ _ _

Mr. MABERLY rose, to bring forward his motion
for the repeal of the Assessed Taxes, and he was satis-
fied that if 1000 householders were canvassed, 999 out
of them would be for the repeal of the Assessed
Taxes. He thought that following, up the Chance
of the Exchequer's own principles, he had not taken
the best c,ourse for the attainment of his objects. He
had reduced the duties on no articles which formed
a part of our manufactures, except that on iron,
which he had left still at a rate of duty amounting to
prohibitory. Coffee was an article almost of luxury,
and wine was unquestionably one of that nature. He
admitted that the seduction Of duties on foreign articles
would induce foreign nations to take Off more of our
manufactures. Out tjte question-w4.s, Whgther all ar-
ti4e might not haee been SitfrFtc4 m 441144itgeQuill
that community in general ? The TedliOieft-ref
ties en British spirits, the Chancellor of the Exchecitter
defentle4 en the ground' of 'abolishing smeggring,lot:
WP0419V90904 akiatlier grP4 4yil in the 44100rali!'
;abortof the people. There was still to be a difference
ef 4e. a gallon between the duties on spirits here and in
ficoOand and Ireland, which was finite sufficient tp
slitce th,e p4ngußip.c4 of gongOing• tits duties ngtu be

as well as wine. In getting rid of the whole of the
Assessed:TA:eh they would get rid of the, whole ptab-
lishsnent of Cousno,sioner.., Tax gabei era, &,-which
would-be.a.g4 ging of 300‘000i hassle- that ;ouflderPunn
it would elies e. the people firun.the vexations incidental
to those mos. The tut 'nn -hou-es and windows .he

thought even m •re oppressive than the Property Tax.
The mode or reducing tales in part was a very inju-
dicious one, a. the whole of the machine! y of collection
remained, and burthened the collection with a heavy
per tentage. He tame now to the Sinking Fund, which,
from the time of Sir Robert Walpole,to this very hour,
had been eui.gized as the only means of reducing the
debt. But from the time of Sir Robert Walpole to the
present time, he (Mr. Maberly) was ready to prove
that it had increased the debt instead of rearing it.—
The Sinking Fund was always a fund for the Minister,
and was always laid hold of whenever a temptation oc-
curred. The daily purchases were always held out as
a great advantage in supporting public credit. But the
Right Honourable Gentleman had thought proper to
depart a little from it, and 0,500,000 only remained
for the daily purchases ; and he would ask whether that
was a sum which could be supposed to support the
public credit of this country? He admitted that the
charge of the debt was reduced, but that was owing
to the- industry and energy of the people, enabling.
the Ministers to reduce. the interest, and not at
all affected by this delusive Sinking Fund. It
was the giving up twenty 'millions of direct taxes,
which had been the first cause of the present prosperity
of the country. If it were-expedient to maintain this
fallacy of a Sinking Fund at former periods, it could
not be necessary now, when the fallacy was exposed,
and the necessity of it no longer existed. He antici-
pated that itswould be said, notwithstanding there had
been no real Sinking Fund from the time of Sir Robert
Walpole to this time, that the public credit would be
ruined if that fund were not maintained. lie (Mr. Al.)
gave the Chancellor of the Exchequer perfect credit for
the uprightness of his intentions in rejecting the popu-
larity which he would have obtained by abolishing the
House and Window Taxes. And he gave the Right
Hon. Gentleman and his Colleagues credit for the revo-
lution which they had brought about in respect to trade ;
formerly, the rule was restriction, and freedom was
the exception; but now, restriction was the exception,
and freedom was the rule. The Hon. Member con-
cluded by moving his first resolution, for taking off the
whole if the Window Tax.

Mr. LEYCESTER seconded the motion. He was
favourable to the measure, as it would cure the evils of
absenteeship, and abolish all the vexations and abuses of the system.
Mr. HEATHCOTE professed himself anxious to
relieve the country from the Assessed Taxes, but he
thought that could not be done without the abolition
of the Sinking Fund ; he conceived that would be the most effec-
tual means of preserving peace, or enabling the country to go to war.

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said,
he confessed he was much surprised at this motion be-
ing brought on to-night, and chiefly at what was said
upon the extinction of the Sinking Fund. The Ho-
nourable Member for Aberdeen intended to bring the
same subject under the consideration of the House, and
he wondered this motion, with the same object, should
be made without a distinct basis. However he had the
precedency, yet he thought it would have been more
fair and reasonable, if he had prefaced it, before he
brought it under the consideration of the House. The
Honourable Gentleman had alluded to, and taken ex-
ceptions against, some diffei ent items of his reductions,
and then turned to the abolition of the whole of the
Assessed Taxes. The Honourable Member for West-
minster had also given notice of a similar motion for
the repeal of the Window and House Tax. The Ho-
nourable Gentleman had been kind enough to approve
of what had been done lately, and of the exertions of
the Ministry for the benefit of the country. He said
this was no more than justice. He could vouch every
thing he had done was intended for the best interests
of the country, and to place it in the most advani-
tageous situation. However, the Honourable Gentleman
had commented with some severity on those reductions
he had made for facilitating our trade and commerce.
He would not contend the principle, but say, the re-
duction of those duties was a boon of 1,500,00011
or 1,600,0001. to the country, and in the next en-
suing year would be upwards of three millions and a
half to the relief of the country, and yet the. Honourable
Gentleman requires to get rid of the Sinking Fancy.—
The Right Honourable Gentleman then alluded to his
reduction on Hemp, which would be reduced to SO in-
stead of 15 per cent. However, people interested in
this matter, and who are well acquainted with every
thing on the subject, believe the reduction of 15 per
cent. which is one halfpenny per pound, will be a very
great boon, and that he would not be blamed, but
rather praised, for making that selection. The next
' item mentioned was Coffee, the reduction on which it
was said was of no value to the Country, that it was not
to general use, and was but a mere article of luxury.
But were it not from some extensive cause, such as the
duty, the consumption would be greater. The sure
criterion of duties being too high, was the consumption
lessened. A cup of coffee might be a luxury to the
'honourable Gentleman after dinner, but it was a part
of the poor man's necessary meal. It was salutary,
palatable, and nutritious, and he Wished to increase
the consumption of it as much as possible in the
country for the comforts of the people. Let them
consider, besides, how beneficial the increased use of
coffee would be to our West Indian Colonies. This
reduction would *cause its very extensive cultivation
tpere, with less skive labour, and thus tend to amp.
'borate the condition of the slaves. He then ob-,
jected to what was done with the duties on wine,
asserting that 'it was a mere article of luxury; btu'
he did not view it in that light ; and were it even to be
so viewed, why should her 'not give those luxuries to
the respectable; though poorer orders of society, which
the higher clashes enjoyed ?-The -arguMent of the Hon.
Gentleman, on Os mbject, wasdireetty in the teeth of
House -

could not have ddne less thain he had proposed: The
Hon. Gentleman said, that the tax on tobacco ought

a--Not lessahan three millions soda half.
.How
the sum applied to theleduction of the. wine duties
(750,0004 Operate favourably on tobacco? If any
thing were done respecting that article, the_ preventioo
of smuggling must be its leading feature. Now, in pr.
der to check that great evil, a 'eduction of the. duty
must be made, sufficient to put it out of the smugglers
power to compete with the fair trader ; therefore,a much
greater portion of the duty on tobacco than 750,0001:
must be taken off, or we should be doing nothing. But
the public interests did not admit even of such a reduc-
tion, which, after all, would be unproductive of the de-
sited object ; for suppose that one-half the duty Were
repealed (in lieu of the reductions proposed by himl,
the consumption of that article must he doobled,in order
to meet the defalcation which such redection must cause.
'lles, even applying the 750,0001. which he (the Chan-
cellor of the Exchequer) had already proposed should
be directed to other purposes, these would still be a
deficit of 750,0001. But, the Honourable Gentleman
asked, If ydu do not chine to reduce the duty on to?
,bacco, why not direct your attention to tea:" The
duty on tea, the House knew, was 100 per cent. on ire
value; yet, tempting as it necessarily was, smuggling
of tea was muck more difficult of' practice than of
other articles. The duty on tea produced upwards of
3,000,0001. The same objection consequently applied
to the partial reduction of duty on that article which he
had suggested with reference to that on tobacco, for no
reduction of less than three-fourths of the duty could
hate the effect which the Hon. Member anticipated.
Three-fourths-of that duty would be 2.250,0001. but
even were it only a million, how could the deficiency
be made up, unless indeed consumption could.be pushed
to a paint on which no rational man could reckon ? Now even
suppose a million only were reduced, although the Honourable
Gentleman recommended a much larger reduction--.
Mr. M BERLY.-1 beg the Right Hon. Gentleman's
pardon. I only intended to press upon him the necessity
for reducing the Assessed Taxes by the sum which he proposes to
apply otherwise.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER was
sorry he h-ad misunderstood the Honourable Gentle-
man's argument, but even according to the Honourable
Gentleman's own principle, a. sum 01E500,000 only
could be applied to the objeet proposed by him, The
question tesolved itselldistinctltioto this—had the best
course been followed ? If he were to adopt the Hon.
Gentleman's suggestion, he might have applied himself
to the reduction of the' duty on tea; still the Honour-
able Gentleman argued, that at all events the Assessed
Taxes ought to be got rid of, and prorosed to effect that
object by the application of the Sinking Fund. But, he
would ask, had nothing been done towaids reducing
the Assessed Taxes, even while the Sinking Fund was
maintained? Since the year 1821, the Assessed Taxes
of the United Kingdom were reduced by no less a sung
than £3,soo,ooo—(Hear, hear)—one half of the entire
amount. Relief had also been given to the people in
other matters—in articles of necessary consumption ; in
malt, salt, &c. Considerable relief had also been afforded
by reduction of duties on articles of foreign production.
Was that doing nothing for the relief of the people? •
The Hun. Member said, that by applying 3,500,0001.
of the Sinking Fund to the repeal of the As.essed
Taxes, there would still be a surplus of 1,500,0001.
while the Honourable Member at the same time con•
tended, that there was in fact no surplus at all, for that
everything connected with the payment of what was
termed the dead weight by the Bank, was a juggle—
(Cries of Hear, hear). Thus, the Honourable Gentle-
man contended, there was in fact only a surplus (Sink.
ing Fund) of Three Millions, yet he required that we
should repeal tales to the amount of three millions and
a half. which would leave a deficit of half a million—
(Hear,hear). Such a proposition was contrary to rea-
son and contrary to every principle of political eco-
nomy. Mr. Ricardo himself always contended (Particu-
larly in the debates of 1828) that we ought to have a
surplus, although he disapproved of a Sinking Fund,.
He had' thus, he thought, said sufficient in reply to the
Hon. Gentleman, and should therefore reserve his oth*
arguments for defence of his system. The Honourable
Gentleman said, that outside the walls of that House hit
(the Chancellor of the Exchequer's) propositions were
received with disfavour—but, from what had come to
his owe knowledge (and he thought it sufficient author
r:tf)-he could assert that the very reverse was the fact—
' (Chow s). And he was convinced that when they
should come hereafter to be judged with reference to
the principles on which they were founded, so far front
being received with dissatisfaction, he had reason to
trust that they would be reeognited as originating in
the best feelings and desires to promisee the Comfort! of die peep's,
and founded on the most fair, just, and enlightened regard tu their
interests--((.heering).
Mr. CALCRAFT expressed the extreme satisfaction
he felt at hearing the statement of the Right Hon. the
Chancellor of the Exchequer on Monday list, hut
should, neverthelest„ vote for the first of his Hon.
Friend's resolutioni for remitting the Window and
House Duties. The Right Hon. Gentleman had un.
questionably taken, since his entrance into oNce, alsOit
enlightened and liberal course for the adveVage ofthe
nation, yet he (Mr. Calcraft) conceived that a largi
portion of .the Sinking Fund applied in the repeal of
direct taxes, would do more service than in reducing
the capital of the debt. They were now, after ten :years
of peace, paying upwards of fifty millions of taxes—
and was that state of things to continue till we a ere
plunged in imbiber war? The Sinking Fund appeared to him a
mere teseppeitlio to expense and restless ambition.—After a finis,
non elbeesoatime relative to the Wine Trade, the Honourable
Maribor coneluded by supporting the first of the Resolutions.
Sir JOHN WROTTESLEY was for the repeal of
the 'Whole of the Assessed Taxes; and after abolisbiug
them all, they would still have a surplus of two minions, provldea
'44 gave up the Sinking Fund.
Mr. Alderman. WOOD could assure the Right Hon.
Gentleman that his mode of relieving from theWindoss
Tax gave no relief at all ; because, whenever he took off
that tax, the landlord added the amount to the rent.
He'wOnict vote for this motion,' because be looted vote agana'sill
He hoped the House or Window Tax week, Winn; be

it would receive vessels of iiiiiatOns berth en) 1•oulsi co t- "4° 14ke .C 9141114111" Cif
R;i343g°ftg' 41191
duties
n 11141"
uentufman, on pm s,if ojeq, was mrecuy ith tne mem or gages.
aHe hoped
e the House or winnow -sax wow:1/2 as 7sss, .
mence at Seaton Bay (1)w-. een the tart Point. and equalised tibrasshout the ernpne,•to cure-that e.g. Of all the arguments he had heard, is that House or else. totally
h
ie.- Portland 11464 in Devo shire and would ran into euz° he dwell say 3113°0°§* He a reed. that these- where. I-1 they did lot this now with. respect to wines Mr. HUSKISSON said, he could easily conceivet at
ie.: Bridgewater Ba • ‘l'
' ' ductinn of the cyder duties was ne6malt as it was they might 'lose the opportunirr: The lionotsrable theTe were , y-persons in 'dia. Csitasi).!7llo,_.;lilEe the
in the Bristol Channel. At each end •. •
)- would be for a safe end convenient harbour; ';:n . iii
.donk, as ht... mi stove c,,..ouln_ttes. 0 thought op tlip Gentleinv fo iid partici* fault with his reductiOn on rthy
taken
..,_
re' that both in the Ea 'lish * well the Bristol Channel,• •-
sploject pf t e Aintsivid apses, that mach too little had spirits. or this he the Ahascellor of
g ps w as "... , ,__ - '*
vessels %PAW 'have :additional sheltrer .ia bad weather. "`"' awe, AlJa to iron,. ne was glad of the course was , , Q . *,9 4
inpch t lit ie. nstetdt of the rlsluction tT fp. nature, er 1 were ormer 7 avowed, . . i
the Exchequer) taxes shoild -be :off; and had principles of' Ulla
in. It weuld also afford additional facilities •to our cem,jciwis,h had.bcenallogted by the 'Bight HonotrObli rits, the reductions should ' appl. to .
Ii the duties on 'Parliament in an evil- hour, they would-41.0 le# to the
re metre
all' ci, 0400041:- litter •IVe° *0 I"
merce With Ireland andwould ' ''ei d "Tentieman , buthe .c iso no vearß Vi • .*.f PIN"
uld .'
' lie .11 '-' oilier articles,. *iikich the' Honddrable • Mtsiber men- destrSSCnon of • the 13_6%411 `E/RP.ire, • l.sv •Lialatmi late
I- • ,
er
w_ . .. ~_ .. preVent the d ,
Fe - life; mcii attended the navigation.rminfl 4e Ipaild s
aY .6tP,, ciple should not have biteii ,e to to Oink; lip • toned and ttotighi mem usefal. .ant.tbue duties were obligations of patianl 191191kv•-i 14e t,:pliter4a, takaf
9,4A°. ...like ground .ham een¢ examined by Ode we soa-.41.,.."4,t•b•P fetsi. 544-- 991946-141e1.- I" aif be did lessened to put down smuggling. The dillies' were such *MO,
st •of thiefAnten 9-411thities wcitid in, kg Isold stscra Scptla di-Oukt "rwoti be impossible that rbasrlsileminetick'Shi, eon+, 0' lo 1. over. a , ~
, and also by that skliful and experienced Officer not 'ts"P' Fe* P9C geikeiCkiPlr 1- ——-.- - - -e, • • •I' 1‘• •• •: .1. .j" • :...i.-- .• • gtodiito . • ;alibi/70A zli .resoe4 e Ed t t e fp-
"-. tc , *, wlO CAnCiPleli 1
Di = Ikr hall i• - - 4A144143. xi w4i be * -bat' c OW; _ q 19;! wilhalViVegkuis Aft AP.e,OIP/M9,9,,itY. ,1,14 to OrktP_F .sßlifst,',,,,"l? ,"1 411 e d 4 rit %a l'"__:1:111-1. • ntm.-•,• •••Li..,.. 4totiiit •''.r' . • j ".: '4
10 ' that the •thin ' * ' - U*— -s '• • !'h ;- m' the r,..au 1. %Lion cif* vai tl loir.it diskigy ? -4-iingeep !situ' at. wn minis, and i trip jdustiose au" got wv,,.. di, .ykly,
ja
~ . ',Ff., wpm, Fn.) i ~.t
1g Pi tr,444 .4Mi_4ll
_al 4tivatiosse..
g was perfectly practicable, aoti resold jot Off dm: • • . 1 .t..t . IP 40 .-. - •-: - • - i , ~_ -.. , ...k_ -•a ..•e2- • t fir eikkiiii• • •111 1' -14 m ,• ! siyeq. Aiiiejain, c vigge •
wits Oite wt.fftlitck, wAkihsilistA. 44ty,9f Vora,),QQW. Dee mum: -nut' tn • =ono a t n vi gpi
114 • _ .114 r 31: XVitglU Att.t4W ,it .oUtitor shesmasideratien, of )410,944 y), ibase:Oilin Aftflqr,o46* i; .y hop -din'emiliinestoithe tam- innikais -aka,/ itekilde;',4l
.Essisbusg liku!d6+l!•l72_9_killamisaliodi,:ista.=__ • aid
kl..- 6• - I Ape iiiiiiisockstber-this would not diminish-our coast- Id. Ito: Ait 4ivatfAilefiqweipeioisfugqr,iina Agliamokiet 4ft• Übe &elitism) sod 54%; dal kr. if 11111112rier, •17411' :r,,„ . . ,t,.7llMir ,tft.lers
-r:..,,a;..t •7. 7. ~' -!- R'.. ..,....--- • • •
..., • '.% .• V! (•:: -!1-$1,d• 'Wm ni mai xid to 1.13141 1:1: !m r;ff 'ism 01-1,.3n0vi1bt111.4”, utt. of "leo, a 0 IW .., . ,1 . ..,,,,11.
~; , :. , . , .., b,„
.
• • -
. • . •
. ,
I•. • .
• ,
i
• • , .
-'. • .
-,,, * • - _ _
. , . . • N.A. ....,......... • - -