Star.
London, England, 1823-05-01 00:00:00

land, lastly, to the preservation of thepeate:444
country, they would find that the nego&atinasuta
tasrally divided themselves into three stage,. It ebb -
csfsg„, place, as to what had been done at Vtrons,
In the second place, as to
what related " FT .1 (NMI
and thirdly, as to that part or the,e
which related to Spain--(Hear, hear).-: - And bent
he must observe upon that Which Was not tee
smallest fallacy, universally pervading the argils
%lents of Honourable Gentlemen opposite—that oupp
selected from one part of the correspondeaCe thi•
which applied to a different time and circumstance,
' They extracted a passage from one part of the nese.
ciations, and applied it to another. For instance, Ole-
Honourable Baronet (Sir Francis But Jets) -adopting
an argument-which he had heard In another plant
and which, as he had borrowed it, was the only wet*
and useless part of his argument—following is a&
with the air and gesture of the Noble propr:etof
the idea, and. causing in the minds of his hear**
from the very inflection of his manner, an into's*
tary recurrence to the line of the poet— •
Quiddignum Santo feret hie promisee' Mato."
" Come what exclaimed the Hon. Baronet-Atli,
Majesty will be no party to any interference" If dill.
lion. Baronet conceived that that instcnction apollerr
to the whole of the negotiations—if he supposed that
it applied to the interference of France oith Spit,
or that it referred to an advanced state of the pecir
eeedings —though such an opinion be admitted, if well
founded, would make something for his argurnentda,
yet as it really did happen to apply merely to Ilse AIN
lies in their corporate capacity, when theinva,inn.
Spain was proposed as a subject in which the ittetallf
of all were concerned, that declaration was tbW
made—that his Majesty to such a proceeding "mule
form no party, even though the dissolution of Air
Alliance should prove the consequence of that taiti:
Sal. (Cheers.) If, then, the Hon. Baronet would heft
the goodness to follow up that eaper Moon batteis,.
that art of sinking in instruction, he would fio,i otitis
the proceedings of the Allies had been paialted ry
that declaration, and that lions tit inno.eat
thoughts of making the invasion of Strain a johtt np‘..i
ration were abandoned —(Hear, hear.) It pOhtit,
its in mechanics, success • consisted in achieving the;
greatesrobject by the least power, the negaciati
had proved eminently successful. (.ISar.)—iliEst:
had not overstepped the decorum due to Powers withr
whom they were then in friendly discussion,. they
bad, however, used menace adequate to its object 4 •
and no idle waste of winds had been displayed, where
such an exhibition must have proved injurious or at
least useless—calculated rather to irritate the temper
than to convince the understanding. And who were
the witnesses of this declaration and its result? the
first was the Duke de Montmorency, who dtoinctly
declared in his Note to the Duke of Wellington, that
England had actually discountenanced and disdained
all connexion with those principle. which led to the
invasion of Spain. His words were, !. the success
of which meaures would have been completely
cured if England had thought she could concur is
them." Alluding to the otfered mediation of &glad,
" He thinks that with such feelings that Government
may tender essential service to 'Europe, by offering is
the like manner to the Government of Spain, advice,
which by leading 'them to entertain more Cahn•
views, might produce a happy influence na is/-
internal situation 6f that country"—(llear,hsse):
In the next plane, he had the testimony of Sir Wik
Hain A'Court,in big report from M. de San Migad,,;
thanking _England for the part she had taken, mil
looking forward to her interference and effects/lapel
sistarite, and trusting that the exercise of her
fluence to prevent war would not be denied. lie
third witneis, for whose favourable