Star.
London, England, 1822-10-12 00:00:00

704,904
X. 1

1.07,700070 i
12,

1: 46,103
il 72,144
1

, 50,519,970 942,958
Deduct Increase... ...
Decrease on the Year £ ...

50,528,80 f

QUARTERS ENDED CWT. 10.
1822.

Increase.

Customs

2,944,251; 2,941,887
8,149,286; 7,529,927
1,625,220, 1,674,505
342,000; 360,000
793,552; 653,2281
207,4811 163,211;
61.222; 94,488,

Excise ...
Stamps
Post Mice
itsstssed Taxes
Land

Tt..tal

14,022,912 13,217,7,1

Deduct Increase...)

Decrease on the Qiattet

805,598

INCOME and CI I A RGE the (70SSOLI DATED FUND
in the Quarter ended toth October, 1822.
INCOME.

Customs - - -
Excise - - -
Stamps - - -
l'ost Office - - -
Assessed Taxes - -
Land Taxes - - -
NiscLllaneous - - -
Uasppropriated War Duties -

£1,454,780
6,615,021
1,674,503
360,000
653,228
165,211
94,488
2,494

4:10,995,725

To Cash brought from Supplies, being the amount
issued in Ireland, pursuant to Act 57 Geu. 111.
c. 48. - - . -

209,841

.C 11,205,566

CUARGIG-

riteliequer Annuities - - - -
South Sca Company - - - -
Bank, on thtir Capital - - -
Dividends - - - - -
National Debt, and the Naval and Military Pension

£3,749
100,000
179,1'25
4,986,983

Annuity
Civil Li't

4,595,763
212,500
97,620
84,260

Ozher Charges

ToNI charge -
Sur plu

.C 10,180,000
925.:,66

11,205,566

Deficiency at sth July, 1822, made good by zn is-
sue of Exchequer bills charged on the grownig.
produce of the Consolidated Fund, for the Quar-
ter ending 10th October, 18'22
Deduct Surplus, stated as above 925,566
Ily further Redemption of /2.2,67,7,000 in
Exchequer Hills deposited in the Tel-
kis Chests - 6C0,000

8,561,7422

1,525,568

Total Amount to be provided for by an issue of
Exchequer Bills charged on the growing pro-
duce of the Consolidated Fund, for the Quarter
ensuing

£6,836,154

PALACE COUR l', OCTOBER 11.

LAUSON V. HULAIN.

The plaintiff and the defendant are both females.
The plaintiff, who had been cook to the defendant,
brought leer action to recover four guineas, the
amount of a quarter's wages.
Mr. James Hulme, a young gentleman of fashion-
ahle appearance, the defendant's eldest son, was ex-
amined for the plaintiff, and proved, that she had
been biled by his mother at the rate of 161. a year,
and had entered into her service on the 17th of July,
and continued in it till the 24 of September, on which
day Mrs. Hulme having called her Roan the head of
the kitchen stairs, she made no answer, and Mrs.
Hulme having again called, the servants in the kit-
chen asked the plaintiff, " Did she not hear her mis-
tress call?" The plaintiff replied, " Much I care for
that." Mrs. Hulme insisted on her leaving her ser-
vice instantly, and her wages to the day being cal-
culated by the witness at 3/. 6s. 6V. that sum was
offered her, which she refused to take, saying she had
Agreed for sixteen guineas a year, and would consult
with her friends. The plaintiff's case clo,ed here.

There was no evidence for the defendant.
The Learned Judge charged the Jury, that although
the defendant hired the plaintiff at yearly wages, she
still retained the power of discharging her at any
moment for misconduct ; and the answer she had
given when called by her mistress, was such miscon-
duct as would justify discharging her; but they were
to examine whether the sum tendered in payment of
by wages amounted to the sum actually due.
The Jury teturned a verdict for the plaintiff 3/.128.
which entitles the plaintiff to costs.