Star.
London, England, 1824-06-16 00:00:00

cricrirtc.viT4s.—Juiv 6.

I. Muriel, Peckham, commiision-ag, rt. E. Tl:takins, Ikre-
ford, alealer. T. Brow!, I_te of CM.hmtrsh, &dap, farmer. C.
T. Lewis, Ebley, Gloucest-2r.hire, grocer. J. T. Betts, 'ltmple-
place, Blackfriari-road, wine-m.:tchata. E. 11. niggles, Stout,
Staffordshire, Iton-founder.

i
1

Lord Gtiroati rose at four o'clock, when the House adjourned
during pleasure, and at five o'clock the Loma CHANCELLOR took his
seat upon the Woolsack.
The Earl of LIVERPOOL laid upon the table, by command of
his Majesty, certain Papers relating to the Slave Trade.
The Exchequer Bills Public Works Bill, the Highland Churches
Bill, the British and Irish Fisheries Bill, the Salt Duties Repeal
Bill, the See of Canterbury Bill, the Weights and Measures Bill,
the Australian Company's Bill, and the Royal Irish Mining Com-
pany Bill, were severally read a third time, passed, and sent to the
other !louse.
Viscount M LV IL LE presented a Petit ion from the Commit-
tee of Lloyd's, against the Marine Insurance Bill, which was or-
dered to be on the table.
Mr. Secretary Pus. and others, brought up the Stafford Peerage
Restoration fill, as agreed to by the other House.
The LORD ADVOCATE of SCOTLAND then brought up the Mar
Peerage Bill, the Strathallan Peerage Restoration Bill, the Ken-
limit Peerage Restoration Bill, and the Nairn Peerage Restoration
Bill, all which Bills had been agreed to by the other House.
Mr. BUXTON, Mr. BROODEN, Sir J. GRAHAM, and others, brought
up the Marine Company Insurance Bill, the New Churches Build-
ing Bill. the Dublin Port Duties Bill, and a great number of Pri-
vate Bills, which, together with those beforementioned, were re-
ceived, and the latter read a first time.
The Earl of H A R ROW BY moved to suspend the recent Stand-
ing Order of the House in favour of a Bill, which stood exactly in
the same predicament as the Irish Mining Company's Bill.
[lt was understood that the Noble Earl alluded, although he did
not mention it, to the Equitable Loan Bank Company Bill.]
Lord KING observed, that as the new Standing Order had been
already twice suspended, it would perhaps be better for their Lord-
ships to suspend it altogether for the present Session—(Laughter).
The Marquis of DO 'W NSIII IRE here rose, amidst some con-
fusion. He wished to know from the Noble Earl opposite, for
wha purpose the Standing Order was to be dispensed with, and in
favour .4' what Bill?
The LORD CHANCELLOR was of opinion that every Bill
shohld be moved to he read a second time !More Noble Lords were
competent to move their Lordships to suspend the Standing Orders
of the House.
Aft sr a few remarks from Lord HOLLAND, the conversation
was dropped.
The Duke of ATHOL presented a Petition from the La-
bnurers and Win kttten employed in the West Ir.dia Duck, in favour
of the Equitable Loan Burk Company Bill.
Petitions were ptieSert,d by the Earl of LAUDERDALE against the
aboyernetitioned Bill, from Shadwell, from Poplar, from Lime-
house, from Obi and New lir:milord, from St. George's in the East,
from Bow, from West Ham, from (7hrisichureb, Surrey, from St.
Votnipb Without, from St. Mary's in Newington, from Fulham,
from Kensington and Hammersmith, from St. Andrew's, in Hol-
born, front St. George's, in Hanover-square, lions St. Clement
Danes, from St. Margaret's and St. John's, Westminster, and from
St. John's, Clerkenwell.
The Earl of DA It N LEY presented a Petition from certain In-
habitants '.l Deptford and Greenwich; in favour of the Equitable
Loan Bill. •

Lord REDESDA LE presented a Petition from the Corporation
of the !loyal Exchange Assurance, against the Marine Insurance
Company Bill, and praying to be heard by Counsel against it. -
Earl GREY presented a Petition from Chester-k-Street, in the
County of Durham, praying that his Majesty's Roman Catholic
subjects might, at no distant period, be relieved from the disabilities
and disqualifications to which they were at present liable by law.—
The Petition was shortly read, received, and laid on the table.
The Earl of HAROWSCKE rose, together with the Earl of Dann-
Lev, the first wishing to move the second reading of a Bill, and the
second to present a Petition to the House; but it was agreed, at the
instance of the Lord Chancellor, and with the consent of their
Lordships, than Petitions had in such cases the priority of Bills.
The Earl of DARNLEY said, that the Petition which he had
the honour to present to their Lordships was from the County of
Monaghan, in Ireland. It was numerously signed ; and from the
In-trot: i he hed received, though it was now very 1 ite in the Ses-
sion, he te!r is hie duty to call upon th, it Lordslii:A fur sonic opi-
nion or the strhject of it. lie had understood, but he might be
mistaken, t a Noble Earl opposite (Liverpool) had declared, that
from circonuAte.ces which had lately come
,to his knowledge, he
was more than Leer determined to resist what was falsely ealied
Catholic Emanclparion. This, he supposed, was to be attributed to
the ex:raneous matter which had. unfortunately for Ireland, been
introduced into some late Petitions on the subject. But the Peti-
tion he had now the honour to present to their Lordships, was not
only quite divested of all offensive matter, but was respectful to
their Lordships, and protested the feeling of undivided allegiance
to his Majesty- In presenting this Petition, he did not mean to
ground any motion upon it, hut he hoped that nothing would indis-
pose their Lordships, on account of trivial improprieties, to refuse
a hearing to the Petition, the prayer of which was due to sound
policy and true relii;:tm. lie felt it his duty to say this much, for
mid this qutesion Wal settled, all their Lerdships could do for Ire-
lend went for nothing—it was merely as a drop in the ocean ; it Was
a pet tel:t. fiction; aril lie should fcel it Iris duty for ever to press such
stilik-cts upon their Lordships. Ireland could not much long, rbe
governed by the mold only ; and, with this conviction on his mind,
he wished the Petition to be read, as containing the substance of
everything which be considered of importance.
Lord CLI EDEN perfectly concurred in what his Noble Friend
had so slily stated.
The Earl of DARNLEY then moved that the Petition should
be received and printed.
The 11.:a!I o'f LIVERPOOL would certainly oppose the print-
ing of the Petition, on account cf the eviis which such a practice
had created in another Douse.—The Petition was then read, re-
ceived, and ordered to lie on the table.
Upon the motion of the Earl of LIVERPOOL; the New
Churches Building (in populous districts) Bill was read a first time,
and ordered for a second reading to-morrow.

~...e :c+~r-

~..

iilbstances,, hpill wishing that thp pre-
totaled, in •or€lsr to ve time for
on-the soMecu .
BO lONTSE thcinght tike Bill likely
in the administration of jus-
prolixity in detail, and that it
benefit of Trial by Jury. If
oble Lords seemed to wish, were
year to another, he doubted
be carried at all.

'N was disposed' to acknow-
ledge with gratitude _ boon conferred by the present
Bill: as also the benefits which Scotland had derived
from the institution of the Commission for Inquiry. It
was true, indeed, that the Bill had come before their
Lordships rather late in the Session ; but how did it
come before them? It came before them, not only
under the auspices, but with the express recommenda-
tion of the most learned and competent men, in every
sense, which England and Scotland could furnish ; and
he was the more gratified, when he found that the pre-
sent Bill was literally a transcript of the Report made
to their Lordships by such persons, a Report which had
been unanimously signed with the consent of the Judges
of the Courts in Scotland. In full persuasion of the
benefits which were likely to be derived by Scotland
from the measure; and with a desire that the Bill should
pass as speedily as possible, in order to terminate the
delays and quibbles of law, he was glad that its opera-
tion had been fixed for the commencement of the Sum-
mer Session. He was aware of the anxiety which was
felt in Scotland for the success of the Bill, which owed
much of its success to the expeiience and encourage
ment of the Noble and Leal ned 1,0; d on the Woolsack,
asngoing to prevent expenses and delay. It must he
some satisfaction for their Lordships, that the passing
of this Bill would facilitate their Appellatedulisdiction;
and he believed that the Bill would be passed unani-
mously by the House.
The LORD CHANCELLOR also gave the Bill his
strenuous support.
Lord REDESDALE recommended the Tlon,e to
pass the Bill in the present Session. If it did not mass,
it would seem the House were doubtful of the efficiency
of such a measure. He was enabled to say, from cor-
respondence with persons on the law of Scotland, that
the Bill did not go too far.—The Bill was lead a third
time and passed.

' • - %
..."444.....
s iit
. . under all the cirenilbstance
PARLIAMENTARY I/MVP EDINGS. seat Rill might be tutared
_ Nek , more infortbation on-the si
HOUSE OC:=PJW" 15. Tile Duke of MONTRI
This mottosjos Lord Gimes or the furtherance of Appeals to product more decorum
t at ten n'elock.Vat Niditast. tice in Scotland with less 1
" Eticitlvildifo
il but judgment was deferred. led for, was beard out,
was likely to extend the
1 .. Brown V. Maxwell," from the Court of Session, was reversed the measure, as some Nobl
by the house. • • thus deferred from one
Todd a. Hutchinson".was affirmea in part.
much whether it would be
gi Wallace v. Campbell" was afterwards beard in part, and or-
dered to he proceeded with to-morrow. The Earl of ROSSLY;
. —____ _ ____ _. r.... "'AMU Whon the House adjourned ledge with gratitude the b