Star.
London, England, 1809-02-17 00:00:00

. . .
seined ta tiro ee three daYs? A; No, I doulited Tice tile !eufed*.efirs IWO=
-
influence at that time. '• ' • .-- Mlbea.regtOrvid bfilik - f the Committee."
-Qt {By Mr.•WurrslZAD- I can you say p&flti... yellerried-eridlOtit *di :'coder.
you cannot product the note ?A. I hevoitilf -..' Mr: .81.1.MNER sci.livnit tOthe Nouse the neves-
abbot me. -Q. Is it possible far you to find it'?
~s nof-takmg.pOssesstent rpers of the prisoner,
4
ern.
ISo not know ;. I hope it is.- -Q. What rebind listite- -aid:-wife shotild . '
you for that hope ?A. Because I put kin tisyl . The SPEAKER widen' 'Honourable Member
bureau, among other papers.-Q. Has antrele butt could state mai* eatoe'fo•t!iir e, that wou dl•bear
yourself access to your bureau ? A. None. but. niy yen such is 'proceeding, 'there were precedents they
wife.-Q. Have you given it to any person to keep ?
.Could act on. .
A. No.-Q. Is it destroyed' A. I don't kno*.-- I Earl TEMPLE askiff:Whether a Committee might
Q. Did you give it to be destroyed ?A. No.--Q1 nettle appointed to make se search. He also thought
Are you sure it is not destroyed ? A. I aim very his wife ought to be ordered into custody.
clear it is not.-Q. Have you the key of your bu- Mr. PERCEVAL stated,diere vetsnotanything be:
reau ?A. No, my wife has it..-Q. Why are you so fore the House which could' justify such severity a)the
clear it is not destroyed ?A. Because I never desired taking. of the wife into custody. If it was necessary
it should be destroyed.--Q. Did you neither destroy she rmght be summoned.
it yourself, nor give it to any other person to destroy Some conversation then took place between Mr.
it ?A. No.-Q. In what room is your bureau ?A. St-stsza, Mr. Bitrznm, Earl TEMPLE, and Mr. Pen-1
In the sitting room.-Q. Have you examined the etvat, which was concluded by
papers in your bureau ?A. I have a variety of pa- Mr. PERCEVAL moving, ii That one of the Ser.
pen there, and searched without finding it. jeant at Arms' deputies, with necessary assistance,
Q. (By Sir SarevaLßOstiza.r.) You say you saw should accompany the prisoner to his lodgings, to
the paper ?A. Yes.-Q. Was it the one you got search for any paper relative to Major Tonyn's busi-
from Mrs. Clarke ?A. Yes.-Q. Did you read it on ness," which was carried unanimously.
seeing it ?A. No.-Q. Then how do you know it The Serjeant at Arms reported to the House that
was the same ? A. It was a remarkable paper, I Captain Huxley Saittlen was in custody, and desired
could hot forget it.-Q. What was there remarkable him to express that he would be happy to come before
in the paper besides the writing ? A. It was dirty. the House again.
Q. Where did you put it after ?A.ln my bureau Mr. PERCEVAL said he would be happy the
among other papers.-Q. When you searched there, Prisoner was allowed to come before the House. He
was this the only paper missing ? A. Yes ;it ap- had not a doubt bat he woad. produce the paper.
peared so to me.-Q. Who kept the key ?• A. Soak- Captain SAND Wks ordered' to the outward bai.
times my wife, sometimes myself, and sometimes' it The SPEAKER.asked hits what he had to com-
was left in the bureau.-Q. If a messenger Were • nuinitute.
sent there, could he find the paper now ?. A. I do • Captain Hoitter SA:NbEN then made the following
not know ; I looked myself, and could not find it.- stateinent: I humbly hope this 'Honourable
Q.. You said it was an unpleasant circumstance; what House will excuse rind pardon.my prevarication, I
(Tod you mean ? A. I meant the whole business was come before this Hon. House to reveal the truth.
unpleasant.-Q. When you first mentioned the note to The note isnot destroyed, 'I have it at my chambers;
Colonel Hamilton, how did you describe it ? A. I if required, I. can go and put my hand on it. The
said I had a note in my possession about this business. I note was given' me to shew • Major Twirl, and to
Q. By whom did you state the note was written ? assure him his prOmotionevould not go on, if he did
A. I did not state any body.--Q. Did you not state not pay. the money. "I Iliewed him the note, but took
it was by the Duke of York ? A. I could ncif.--- u from him again. • He agreed to .pay this money,
Q. Did yew? A. No.-Q. Did you take a copy and he was Gaxerted. He gave me five hundred gui-
of it t A. No; I had the original-there was no oc- neas ; I paid Mrs. Clerk 5001. and Mr. Donovan
casion.-Q. Did you think this note was of any im- 151. I cannot say who wrote the note ' • Mrs. Clarke
portant*? A. No.-Q. Was the copy Colonel Ha- told me it was•his Royal Highness the Duke of York
milton took correct ? A. I do not know.- Q. Did wrote it. This is all I know of the business; and-I
you read the copy ?A. No.-Q. Was there any sig- oust thii Honourable House will look with a com-
nature to the paper ? A. I do not recollect.- Q. pastionate eye on my extraordinary conduct."
Whew hand-writing was it i*A. I do not know. The SPEAKER then ordered the Prisoner should
Q. (By a Member.) Do you know Mrs. Clarke's be remanded.
hand-writing ?A. Sometimes.- (A laugh.)-Q. Was The SPEAKER put the question, that the prisoner
it in her's ?A. I cannot say.-Q. Did you ever we be sent in close custody to his residence for the
her write ?A. Yes.-Q. Does Mrs. Clarke write in phrpote of •lookiirg for the paper, which was ordered;
different hands, or always in her own ?A. So difo and he was ordered to be kept in close custody, except
ferently, that I would net know they were written by. 'as to the. tents of the order. Captain Sanden then
the same oerson. - expressed his hope, Viet the House would excuse the
Q. (By Sir J. Gnettest.) Was there any person prevarication he It id been guilty of. He was ordered
present when you were searching for the paper ? A. tete taken fmterthe Bar. •-
None but my wife.--Q. Had your wife and you any Lord HENRY PETTY took 'this opportunity of
conversation upon this subject I A. A great deal.- noticing, that under the circumstances in which they
Q. Did you ever desire her to destroy the, note ? A. were placed,; by being detained to the late hour to
No.-Q. Nor any other person ?A. None.-Q. Did which they 'were likely to be kept sitting, it was int-
yonever desire any person to take it out of your possible to expect a Honseao-morrow .; and as Mon-
bureau ? A. Newer. day next was fixed for public business, which he un-
Q(By Mr. Baottunwr.) flow was the copy taken? derstood could not be postponed, his Lordship gave
A. colonel Hamilton copied it.-Q. Where did you notice he would not bring on his motion till Tuesday
put it after ? A. Into my pocket.-Q. Among next. .
other papers, or singly ?A. Singly.-Q. Did you It was also understood, that Mr. Whitbread's' and
put it among a bundle of other papers ? A. Ido Mr. Ponsonoy's motions should be fixed for the first
nat recollect.-Q. Did you search all your boodles t convenient opportunity.
A. Generally speaking, I think I have.- Q. How The house then resolved itself again into the Com-
can you undettake to say it was not in your bureau, mittee, when Mrs. Clarke was again called in and ex-
if you have not searched all the When
? A. I think amined by Mr. PERCEVAL.
I have searched them all.-Q. When you saw Colo- Q. Do you recollect what passed between you and
mei Hamilton at the British Coffee House did he ad- Captain Sanden, respecting Major Tonyn's impa-
vise you against destroying the note ?A. No.--Q. tience at the length-of time intervening in his appoint-
Or any words to thit effect ? A. No. ment ? A. No, Ido not ; though I have been Just
Did you not say you wished to forget the note t reading Captain Sanden's evidence.-Q. Does the
A.-I said. I was sorry for the whole proceeding, it witness mean the evidence Captain Sanden gave on a
was altogether unpleasant.-Q. What did you parti- former night, as contained in the fifth number of the
cularly regret ?A. Having lost the note.-Q. How minutes ?A. Yes.-Q. Do you not recollect Cap.
could having lost it induce you to say you never had tarn Sanden coming to you on the subject ? A. No,
it? A. It was an unpleasant business through the Ido not.-Q. Do you not 'recollect Captain Sanden
wlo.le. I was very sorry to have lost it. saying, that Major Tonyn meant to withdraw his de-
Q. (By Mr. BATHURST.) Did not you deny, atthe posit on account of the delay ?A. No.-Q. Did
ecnhmencement of your examination, that you bad you send any message to Major Tonyn by Captain
such a note in your possession ? A. I knew then I Sanden ? A. I do not recollect that I did ; it is
Dad it not. likely I' might.-Q. Do you recollect sending any
On the request of the SPEAKER, (Mr. Abbot) the paper to Major Tony-n by Captain Sanden ? A.
Witness was ordered to withdraw. What sort of paper do you mean ?
The SPEAKER then addressed the Chairman. Q. Any written paper ? A. I don't recollect ; 1
There can be but one course the Committee ought to was always cautious of parting with any thing writ-
follow, I therefore move, " That Captain Linsley; ten.-Q. As far as you recollect, did you send any
Sanden, in the course of his evidence, has been guilty written paper ?A. No.-Q. As you say you were
of gross prevarication." (A loud cry of hear! hear! cautious, would you not recollect if you had ? A. If
from al l parts of the House.) Captain Sanden has insinuated I parted with any
The questionwas then put and carried unanimously. writing of the Duke of York, I never did.-Q. Are
The SPEAKER then moved, " That the Com- you sure you never sent any as the Duke of York's ?
rnittee should rise, and the Chairman report." The A. Never, but lately, and once to Mr. Manners -
Hnuse resumed, and the Chairman reported. Q. If you had sent it, would you forget it ? A. No;
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER I could not forget any thing belonging to the Duke
moved, " That Captain Huxley Sanden should be of York.
taken into the custody of the Serjeant at Arms for Q. (By Mr. FRPFMAII/47.) Did you ever receive any
the said offence." • note from the Duke of York, on the subject of Major
Lord FOLKESTONE moved as an amendment, Tonyn's Commission ? A. No, I was used to see him
" That he should be committed to Newgate."• (Acre every day, except when he was in the country, and
cf no ! no !") that was not more than a week in the year.
Lord FOLKESTONE observed, if it were not the Q. (By Lord Foratstoer.) Do you mean to say
wish of the Right Honourable Gentleman opposite, you did not give any note to Captain Sanden ? A. I
(the Chancellor of die Exchequer) he would with- do cot recollect giviim him any, but especially of the
draw his amendment. He thought, at the same time, Duke of York's, as I was afraid of trusting him.-
the witness deserved the most severe punishment the Q. How citex it to occur to you that Captain San
House could inflict. den insinuated any such thing ? A. Because he
The SPEAKER then stated, there were two ways might have insinuated such a thing ; he is capable of
to proceed :he might be ordered into the custody of any thing.-Q. if Capt. Sanden has represented any
the Serjeant, to be kept close confined, and no person note or Major Tonyn as coming from the Duke of
allowed to communicate with him, or simply under York, is it true ? A. It is not.
the inspection of the Serjeant at Arms. Q. (By Alderman Costae.) During the negocia-
The . CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER tion with Major Tonyn, was it said he was tired, and
said, the reason he did not wish to adopt the Noble would withdraw his money ? A. No.-Q. Did you
Lord's amendment was, that lf he were in custody of express to Captain Sanden that you wished Major
the Ser east
eant at Arms, he would be able to accom- Tonyn not to be impatient, as you wanted money
z?
to his•lodginjo; and search for the note. It A. No, I did not ; that would be a reason why I
zany hi
.might also be neceosarythat he might be called be- • should wish him to be impatient.-Q. In the last in-
' forethe COmeainee, however defective bis.evidence tervitw you had with Captain Sanden, did he write
was, if it wigs Made necessary in the course of the ex- • any thing in your room ? A. It is impossible to say,
• • et any other witness. Ile then moved it it is so !Ong ago.-Q. Do you recollect his having
-,. is: Jr in Huxley Sanden should .be kept in le:daisy thing there ? A. No, Ido not.
of the Serjearit at Arms, and not for . 0-.laran tbereany-paper
close produced touching the
- :ore on 4
set to have access to him ; one- that the Ser.. eof .York? A. No ; there Was not.
atshoofel be:directed to bring the prieneez.horom -.•4, IBySir Growl kluailorDid you ever say
. committee of the whole House, investigating mum. hbjor '(By
was 4 siedsliy 'tor being impatient

it in his
.recplle
tve
&its

tuigtflain* ?: tz, / diW het+ •
ght him a perfect Gentleman when Mr. Donoyila
intrisdneed- him to me, and wished to 4eke
Lieutenant-COlonel... • .
Q. (By Mr. Bitatrn,) Had Captain any
interest, and what, .in thenegociation •for Itlatot
Tonyn'?. A: I believe he hai, for I have heara
Major. Tonyn is very generous, and Captain Sandid
is not a man to interest himself for any one without
a reward.,-Q.', Did you understand no from Captain
Sadden t Yes, and from every oi4lelnintioned:
Q. Diidyou understand the substance Of .Capttin
asndett's last examination ? A. ,Not in the
Q. Why do you suppose he meant to insinuate any
thing ? A. Froin what a gentleman Do
you mean from any question pAit to you at the bar ?
Yes.—Q. Which ?A. itie the-Chancellor of the
Exchequer.
Q. Did the Witness give any tort Off the profit to
Captain Sanden for The pion:ludo:tor Major Tonyn
A. I don't recollect that I did,' he'used to help
himself by the way.—Q. • Did you give him a_ny your-
self ? A. I don't recollect that I did.---Seer The. Wit-
ness has saki that Captain Sanden was• to have a
profit from Major Tonyn's promotion—what do yob'.
say on that subject ? A. I was to have 5001.. deal;
and he was to get what he could from the othei
party. He never did any thing for nothing;
Mr. PERCEVAL desired• Mr. Rei4,l_o Slatish;
ter's Coffee-house, St. Martin's-lane, to be Oiled in,
Mrs. CLARKI demanded of the Those .to knOti
had tbey any precedent of two Witnesisei being called
to their bar ? She was called to order.
Mn.RststQ. (By Mr. PcncrvAL.) rib you know the witness
at the bar ? A. Yes, I do.--Q. Did she ever come
to your house by the name of Dowler ? A. By no
other.—Q. Is she the person Yoe called Mis.. Dow.
ler A. Yes.

while

these,
gurk;
its to
when
1)10
The
Q, Is
It was
hand

be Pothi
Q. Did
writing .
Frintiaality
the hA4ti-,
other
best,
annusemi
to guess
4nce•
the ewe,
thi
waiting
were
oust
I but
ever

ILv
best
42-
tin
-sod
gtrii4
pat
bee=

-

[You may retire.]
Mn. CLARK/C.—But before he goes, I beg to say,
I never called myself by the name of Dossier; whit,
ever I might'be called.
Q. • (To M 17.1 RRID, by Mr. A. BARINO Ditty&
believe her mt' 'be Mn. bowler ? A. I did Did
you ever hear Tier say her name was Dewier.? A. I
never did.—Q. BY whoin did you understand her to
be ? A. By Mr. Dowler.
Q. (By Mr. Wanin.e..) Did Mr. thrrierand she
'ever come tbgether.? A. No, they did noti
. [He was'ordered to withdraW.]
Mrs. etatuts--64 I wish to ask a question ofi&e Crows
Lavyers ?"-r( She was called to order.)
Q. Did you know Mrs. Hovendon ? A. Yes.—
Q. Was it when 'she was under the protection of Mr.
Dowler's brother? A. He has no brother.—Q. Were
you in the habit of visiting the Taylor's family-ate
Bayswater ? A. Yes.—Q. Did you know her father?
A. Yes.—Q. Was not Mr. Chance, the stock-broker,
the same person ? A. No he was not.-:-Q. Do you
not know Mrs. Taylor-' is a widow? A. Igo, for I
know her huiband.
Q. Did you keep a man cook ?A. Yes.—Q. Did
you keep more than one ? A. He used to bring
an assistant with Then you did not beep
him by the year ? A. No, they. staid but a short
time ; the Duke 'was very difficult to please.
The witness was ordered to withdraw.
Mr. BERESFORD then attempted to put several
questions to Mr. WARBLE, but it appearing to be the
sense of the House that they were irrelevant, they
were over-ruled. -
Mrs. Corti was nett examined, respecting the burn-
ing of Mrs. Clarke's letters in her husband's posses-
sion, which she did by his direction, at the desire of
Mrs. Clarke, who applied to him for that purpose.
After- the witnes.liad withdrawn, the House waited
for a considerable time for the - return of Captain
Sanden, who at length appeared at the bar.
Q. (By Mr. PEiteivai..) Have you found the.
paper ? A. I have.---Q. Have you it with you ?-'A.
The Messenger has it.
The Messenger handed it to the -Clerk, and in-
formed the House it was found in Captain Sanden's
bureau, together with two other letters of Mrs.
Clarke's, and a bundle of papers, which he likewise
delivered in...Q. Loa at that paper, is that the one
you received ? A. It is.. -Q. Did you receive it from
Mrs. Clarke's own hand ? A. I did.—Q. Was there
any person present ? A. -I believe not.
Thu note was them read, and was addressed to
George Farquhar, Esq.
" I have received your note, and Tonyn's business remains as
it wee (Signed) " FRILDLRICIL"
Q. I ask you again, did not Colonel Hamilton ad-
vise you in the British Coffee-house not to destroy
your papers ? A. No, I have no recollection of it.—
Q. Did he desire you, after you left the Coffee-house,
not to destroy the papers ? A. Never.—Q. What were
the other papers ? A. Upon the levy and other busi-
ness.—Q. Why did yon deny the possession of these
papers ?A. I have nothing to urge in my behalf. I
hope the Honourable House will excuse what I have
done.—Q. Did nobody tell you to deny it ?A. Ns'.—
Q. What motive had you ? A. I had no motives—Q.
If you had considered this paper to be of no impot-
tance, why conceal it ? A. I can urge nothing.
Q. You must see a difference between an excuse and
a reason; what reason had you ? A. I had no reason
whatever.—Q. Can you suppose the House will be.
lieve you came here, and told a falsehood without
any motive whatever ? A. I had no motive, I have
acknowledged my shame,' and I hope the House
will pardon me.—Q When Mrs. Clarke gave you the
letter, did she tell you it was written by the Puke of
York ? A. She said it came from Do you
know the hand-writing of the Duke of York? A. No.
—Q. Are you acquainted with the hand-writing of
Mrs. Clarke ? A. Yes.—Q. Do you know in whose
hand-writing this letter is, directed to G. Farquhar,
Esq.? A. Ido not.—Q. YOu have before stated Mrs.
Clarke wrote in different hands, do yousay so now ?
A. Yes ; you will find those there very different.--
Q. Have you seen her write ? A. Yes.—Q. In the
conrse of your long acquaintance with Mrs. Clarke,
did she ever communicate any thing on the subject
of that letter from the Duke of York ? A. Never.—
Q. Can you tell 'what she said, when she gave you
that letter ? A. No, I cannot..--Q. Did you ever see
her write in various ways ? A. No, but I have seen
her different kinds of writing.
Mrs. CLARCIC examined by Mr. PINICVAL. -
Q. Do you recollect ever having seen that letter
before ? A. I suppose I must have seen ithefore ;it
is the, Dalterwriting ; it is direesed to G. Familiar,
.F.sq. • I ¢o no; believe he ever wow to •07.

title
Itc. is
never
ma;
were
heuii
_knew
with

DS;

long
kw
A.
,01)

ing
.1 must
be
Pll_2

ten

the.
ought

ow.
ktteni

Her
mil

then
lect '
rd

1110`..-
cnstodl

and

brinp
the ►

the
out

with ,
anchored
pe.taon•
the •

from
Dropt

port
oats
Bth
transport
bound ►
farad
17-

George
don, '

short
cur,

few
small
There
Pie

Arthur
second

that direction lint tarn w came
-.•
his pasetissiein t ' A. I do not'bsew...—Q. Do you
,lect giirinfit him ? A. No, bik I think I lutist •
.24
criye4 it Im. 1 krtoir fid other way to account 1•10
siting inhiftiossession.• Q. 1)o you ahvays write
? A. c4nugot !sty ;_I always write. in a hurry,
Are both these' notes your hand writing ?
y were written by other;lnyin.'
e she wrote them.
.She has not written any thing NU
loin- years, without myguidance.—Q. Did you
le he; hoa both of them ? A. lam positive
6 one; bsit I cannot say which.—Q. Do you
e the Lime when guiding your mother's hand, as
n yon art not ? -A-. It must still be my writing.
Do you not know there must be a difference ? A.
upper one is mine. I do net see much difference. Z.
Is the indorseinent on the bill your writhe,
ras done in the same way.; -I guided my mother's 14.1
d ; Mr. Manners was by at the time. There could
iothing criminal in that. On
1. Did you ever imitate any other person's hand.
log ?A. No, not for wrong purposes.--.Q. No T'
ti .dity is imputed ; did you ever try to imitale
hand-writing of other! •A, have tried wi
rr ladies, to see wise-coultlininittle.fiersens' names
but it is too ridieulOnt4ci Mention, merel; for
asement a I have written.. Weeds, and asked them
guess whose it was like among their male acquaint.
e..—Q. Was it part of duit play, or of the skill of Or
Oattles to, write sign, at wirly as possible ? A.
unle-Okee.-02,' *el CIS kottnetane nay. wri.
• lately I was. aionoisig rittitif Wile in
:I\l
ting the evening in this Manner.—Q. Whose band
* you iraitatingi: A.. I was writing promisee- woe
ly, antheas told it was very like the Speaker's, we
I never saw him write.-4.4 laugh.) Q. Did rat Rel
r try to imitate the I)uke of York's writing ? A.
aee..--Q. Did you imitate it well ? A. He is the Li
t jutlge of that. own
2. When you triecrto imitate, was it like his wri.
g ? A. I fancied it was:-7.Q. o you know a per.
of name of Town? -Yes.—.Q. Did he in-
uct 'you' in painting on irelvet ? A. Yes. —Q. Did
a ever tell biro• you would be likely soon to learn, he b
:ause you ctitiM readily imitate various hand.wri. cow
gs ? A. NO : I could hardly tell him so—recollect
is a Jew—;l4lltugh 1.--(2. Are you quite sure you
rev did ; did you ever write in his presence.—A,
.1)
tyliive written while he was present, when ladies
a4O present, and hare said so to than in his Fri
aring. .He was to have had an interview with the pu
uke, along with Jew King; but when the Duke
ewthey were Jews, he would have nothing to do Sur
th them.
Q. Did you, in OA j, ever write a .note like the 10T
eke of York ? A. -If I had, ft would have been told
ag before this: Dia ion Anal* the seal to that
:ter ? ,a.. Yes, It tenon tluird.s private
b fou-knoti-the MOO.? Is it in Eitgibisk of French ?
• It is in French.—Q. You do not recoUbct receiv.
g that letisete the Duke of fork?' A. No, but,
must have remitted it ; it is itik.nitihg, andike *Ol t.
fit to to me.4.:-Q. Dld-yon ever' write to d •
'nisiof YorkeVivatercedellajar Tomint A. his A
other questions of minor inspetunce were
len pat to the Witness, and she Withdrew.
Mr, PERCEVAI conceived it was the wi hof
ie House, that the best evidence that could be found
aght to be brought forward to • prove whether the
)te was ihrwriting of his Royal Highness or not.
le thought tol. Gordon was the best evidence that
311!d be pioduced; and it being inapoosible that his
ttendance could be had that he moved,
That the CoMMittee should...risk and the Chair.
ianreport progress."--Agteedto.
The House resumed, and tisk gagtzstAN re. a
o*ed that the Serjeaut had acqoinianted the visa.
er to his chambers, and had hid befote the Com.
aittee several.papers„which he found therein.
The CHANCELVOR of the EICHEOITER
hen moved, 4, Thai they should io
ect Committee, to investigate any i(nd whiehoftbetia
elated to the business, befote the Cointiiittee of the
vhole Houez." Agreed to ; a:neither ivollowing.COni:
nittee was appointed Mr. I.4ech,h4r. Wardle,-Mr.
3rand, Mr. Creacker, and Mr. C. Mt. Writhe.
The CHANCELWIL of the ,EXCHEQUER
noted, 4 That Captain Huxley Sanden, then in the
:ustody of the Setjeant of Arms, should be commit.
ed to Newgate," which was carried unanimously.
Lieutenant. Colonel .Gordon was ordered to be
iiimnumed to attend the Committee to-morrow.
Adjourned at Four c"Clock.
Don Pablo Cheia.tos has arrived in town with his family
ind
The Venerable is arrived at Liverpool, from Barbtidoes. She
brings accounts to the Sd ultimo. And we learn by her that
the project of an att4k on Martinique is complaely
Ten sail of French logger privateers were seen yesterday from
the heights at Dover. Thirty stout lugger privateers are fitted
out at Calais only, and many more at Boulogne and adjacent 1015.
Deanna, Fes. ll.—f riday evening, the Fleet of Transports.
with General Snatsaooars and the Trtsopa unter his command,
anchored safely In Cork harbour, having encountered much tem-
pestuous weather—as soon as they ha*, talon in fresh walrissa
the wind Were, they will again san on their destination.
Purrs:eon-Tn. Fat. rer.....Arreeed his Majesty's ship Meropr,
from a eruize. Sailed his Majesty's. ship Albicore, 441
Dropt down to St. Helen's, his Majesty'sabip Clarinda, *a ff::,
sail to-morrow, with the fleet for the Mt Liken-Incur). .
TORIAT, Frs. 15..--Revived List evening after post,^the trans-
port Pomona marked': S. Captain Randell, from c.if 'Yip, with
eats the Paned emmly st his Majesty's iship Championen fat
nth stir. is a heavy gale at W.S. W. and as oth lost. ,spoke the
transport Samuel and Sarah of London, (No, 299.) from LitLQr,
bound to Oporto, but owing .o. the violent plee .S. tuns
forced to go to Vigo, Which she left on the 6th instant; tee
French being there, all the English vessels hadkft the port. Zee
Pomona remains with the Channel Beet, under command of Ad-
miral GA Natio ; also the letter of marque
_ Phoenix, Capta;t:
STZWART, from London for Gibraltar.—Wind W. S. W.
The Chesterfield, Mudge, from Live4oo% for hnist...a ; C :
George transport, from Vigo ; and the Ant, narigstet,:fram.Lai.
don, for Cadiz, bare put into Kinsale.
The Rebecca, Williams, from Waterford, is on shore on the
South-Bull, Dublin,
Coax MARkrr, MAPZI-LANI, Flo. IT.—There is an ertretne
short supply of Wheat to-day, and sales then dime orally *tin:
currency. here it likewise at ort supplies of Barley and Malt, and
few Whim Pets, each 0( which are rather dearer. Foarce any ga
small Old Beans, which are dearer, ahusailtht. to TS. per qu meet
There are likewise short supplies of Oats, and In ti's ar.icle laa
peices *re fully nllipottod...filour withoW at'OL
.4Thbagnt
Yesterday at Heeissiski.etistea, eats, the Right Hon 5.:
Arthur Paset,llLi .atal:7Ye j iLidy:attlgu );2 rant,
amense deisaktees efr
LONDON
.PolinSid sad Published - „01"1".
Ott h
wigs. A t nei
1.16"Y.1114
ariTt
•
•