Star.
London, England, 1805-06-26 00:00:00

the highefl importance. By fame accideat the dg-,
fence was nut produced, the client was fenteneeet
to banifhenent, and the orator fent the fpeeek.•
meant to be friil,:in in his behalf, to comfort him
in hi. er.:le. The condo& parfued on the prefent
occali••n was pree.y much of a piece with this fort
of prricedure, and certainly the Right Hon. Gen—
tleman's fprech this evening was not at all calculated •
to ferve either the cl..arader or the views of the Noble,
Lord whole caufe he had In warmly efpoofed. He
could not fee on what principle the fort of fnbterfuge
bad been retorted to, but with the idea of defeat-
ing the calls of juftice, and he thetetore deprecated
any attempt to involve time proceedings of the Houle
in inconfifleney, and to difappoint thole jolt expeda-
lions which the nation at large now entertained. it
was not eafy to fee the grounds on which the propo
fition fubmitted to the Honk by the Honourable
and Learned Gentleman was introduced, for he
could not allow for a moment that any of thofe
lions on which it was attempted to be joftified were
at all confident with truth. It was not true that the
refulutinn now pinpofed to be refcinded was one
obtained from the Honti by furprize. It was, on
the contrary, agreed tn, after one of the graveft de
bates and with the fulled attendance of Members
almofi ever witnefl'ed. It was, however, contend-
ed. that a great majority of the Houfe were (a-
vowable to the mode of pvceeding by impeach-
ment, and that a (mall minority carried the queftion
for the criminal profecution ; this be utterly denied,
and indeed it was impolEble far any Gentleman to
Thew arty proofs in fupport of loch a declaration.—
How could the fenfe of Parliament be afcertained on
this important fubjed 2 Why Curdy by the number of
votes; and if In, then the majority was adverfe to the
cootie of proceeding by impeachment. It was fin-
gular, however, tn hear the Hon. and Learned Gen-
tleman row calling loudly for impeachment, after
having rafted criminal proceedings under any of the
forms prepared. A Right Hon. Gentleman oppofite
(Mr. Canning) bad on a former evening liated that
he preferred the cruelty of impeachment to the mercy
of a criminal profecution, but he too, like the Lear-
ned Gentleman, conceived that to take no Reps at
all in the way of puniflanent was the fitted entree to
be purfned. When the quellion was Taft folemnly
difcured, a Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Pitt) bad,
thought proper to obferve the molt rigid fiknee,
though furely if he had thought that the motion now
fubmitted was it to be pared, he was bound to offer
an opinion.on the fabled; on that day the Right Hon.
Gentleman had been kft in a minority, while by the •
influence of the friends of another confiderablo Mem-
ber of the Cabinet, a propofition which he had re-
filled was aElually adopted. After all this he anted,
whether it was At, when the Route generally under-
flood that the bufiners was finally fettled, when many
Members had gone into the country under this im-
preffion, that a matter of loch magnitude fhould be
again revived, that a Refolution fo folemnly acceded
to, fhould, by taking the Houfe by futprife, be at-
tempted to be refcinded ?--If any flep of In extreor-
cEnary a defcription was meant to be retorted to, it
wasamot too much to ails, that notice of fuch a motion
Mould have been regularly fubmitted to the Houfe.
He himfelf had not been very flack in his attention
to this burinefs, and he was free to declare, that he
never heard of any motion brought forward in fo
extramdinaty a manner. He was convinced that
the Houle ir. general were, previous to yeflerday,
unapprized of the fliglitcfk intention to bring Lar-
val d (Itch . motion, as that produced this evening;
and he is aq Equally Ittisfied that the only object
of it was to defeat all that bad hitherto been done
to being Lot d Melville to a fair trial, on that part of
his coi.duet an which the dirPlEafure of the Houle
had already been pronounced. If the prefent motion
Succeeded, it would only have the died of tendering
every previous determination of the Houfe alto-
gether.nugatory. It was argued, however, that as
the Civil Snit had been ordered, the criminal profe-
euti.rt had been precipitately adopted.. In this pro-
pofition he could by no means aequiefce. The Houfe
bad, under a pat ticular view of fads, ordered the civil
fuits but in confequence of the difelofure of addi-
tional proofs of guilt they had thought a heavier
fpeciesof punifhment indifpenfible. In that cafe there
was no refcinding of a former vote of the Hoofe.—
There was merely a mow,: fall and decided expref-
Lon of the neceffi,y of a fe-ierer punifhment, when
the extent of the delinquency was better ellablilh-
ed. This was perfedly evident. that the Noble
Lord himfclf equally objedled to the mode of pro-
ceeding, or by criminal profecution. If tried by either
of the two Modes, he had declared that his fituation
and treatinent would be erotic than that of the meaned
cottager in the land. If brought before a Jury, he ar-
pied that his cafe had been fo far prejudged, that no
plaice could be expeded—but admitting this to be
true, folely for the lake of argument, it was tarp to
fee that the fame objection held againft the trial by
Ewa. Chment. I3ut it was faid, that by objeding to
dub laill•mentioned mode of proceeding we went the
length of maintaining that the privilege of impeach
went &mild be totally abandoned. He could by
no means Mien to fuch an extraordinary inference ;
but time Houk having decided that the mode of crimi •
nal profecution was preferable, they could not with
any rega. dto cor,fil ency depArt from it. He admitted
that if his ideas had been ailed upon, the }Lure would
have proceeded in the form of impeachment, but a
contrary &ciao') having been adopted,it ought not on
light grounds to be relinquilhed. He would not deny
that the mode prefcribed by the Houfe was attended
with fume difficulties, but they were nut fuels as to jut•
tiry the Attorney General in bringing forward any pro-
poiltioa for fpecific inftruCtions to regulate Isis eondult.
If he was not prepared to fulfil the willies of I' tr/..tment
after the general inftrudions he had received, then
he was unfit longer to dilcharge the important duty
which he rt as now called on to difcharge. It was the
bufinels and the duty of the Learned Gentletnan to
do junic,c betwixt the Noble Lord and the Public,
and if lie conceived that he cvuld not afford this
junice, and if he felt that this judice could not be
obtained in his hands, then it was what fairnefs
required, that a. Winch of fir much intereft ()mould
go into other management. It was a very ftrange
objection to this Cisminal Profecution, that it had
been agieed tn, only by the praeponderance of
of about t •rty or fifty Members, us oppofition to
the general fettfe of the Houle. Thu objection
was the more wonderful, when it was recolleaed,
that out of a Howie, c-nfilling of nearly five
hundred Members, :so -fewer than two hundred and ,
•

thirtpeigitt Ante found •tti ftiispoit - the criminal
profecutton. To talk, then, of the real fenfe of the
Houfe not baying been &dared, was to aliert what
was totally contrary to the adult ilate of the
cafe. How the fpecific • number of forty.thret, -
whole influence had been fo much alluded to, had
atted, he would not now decide. Whether it was
the influence of one part of the Cabinet played off
against the other, be would not then flop to alcer.
tato ; but, at dl events, the nonfe had nothing
to do with theft content. It .was enough to know,
that after the given deliberation, R.efolutions of the
confequence were palled againft. Lord Mel-
ville for his saifeondue in one of the higheft offices in
the State. If' forty.three Members did dedde this-
momentous quenion, this was no proof of the impru-
dence or the vote of the Houfe, or of the inconfilt-
ency of the individuals compoting that Body; they
aEted from the impulfe of honourable fentiment, on a
great public queitinn, and thcir decifion had difufed
throughout the country the utmoil degree of fatisfac-
Gon. To reverie the decifion niche Houfe now, was
a very indecent and uncalled far proceeding. Many
Members were abfenr, whole opinions could not, at
this period of the Setlion, be again collated. In every
view of the fith,ieei, therefore, though originally in.
dined to prefer the mode of proceeding by impeach.
ment, he thould vote againit the motion of the
Learned Gentleman, from a conviaion of the dange
roes confequences of dilturbing a folemn decifion of
the Hoare, obtained after the rulleft confideration of
all thrzircumitanees connected with this interciting
queftion. • •

General LENNOX conceived that Lord Mel-
•ville would be very improperly brought to trial be-
fore a Jury of Weßminiter. From the fituation in
which his Majetty had placed him, he had a right,
according to Magna Charm, he had a right to be
tried by his Peers, at the profecution of the Hoofe
of Commons. It was right that the Houfe &mid
be always ahle to carry its complaint againft a Mi.
Miler, whom it fuppofed to have afted mcorrealy,
before the highelt tribunal in the country. As to the
Attorney General, without attaching any blame, or
throwing any reflation upon his condua, he mutt be ,
naturally anxious to rave a Member of an Admi-,
nitration of which he was himfelf a part. Upon
there grounds, he molt vote for at impeachment.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL vindicated him-
felt from the charge of making any improper appeal
to the Houle for initruaions on a bufinefs in which
the feelings and inter efts o: the Public, as well as the
Noble Lord, were fo intimately involved. He had
never entertained any doubt of the legal guilt of
Lord Melville, fo far as the connivance 'extended ;
but without information from the Houfe, lie did not
feel himfelf fufficiently infiroaed to know to what
extent the profecution on this head was to be carried.
Much had been raid of the participation of Lord
Melville in the profits derived by Trotter from the
mifapplication of the public money ; but without
inflruaion from the Houfe he did not fee that he
could fully enter into any profecution into the whole
of this part of the fubjea. What he withed to al
certain was not how he fhould proceed in condtiaing
the profecution, but what were the points to which
the profecution was to be directed. He felt that
the bufinefs involved a variety of difficulties, and he
was anxious that by the affiflance of the Hindi they
fbculd be removed. It was a matter of great con-
fequence previoufly to the bringing of the action to
fix the venue with accuracy; and he was afraid that
even on that ground the objea of the profecution
might have been defeated. Other difficulties mull
have occurred to any one whole legal knowledge
enabled them fully to underfland the fubjea; and
therefore he was decidedly in favour of the mode of
proceeding by impeachment- In this way the ends
of public junice would be fully accomplifhed, while
the individual concerned would be enabled fairly to
meet his defence. He denied that due notice of the
Motion had not been given to the Houfe. Though
it was only Taft night that his Honourable and
Learned Friend had Ipedficallv announced the Mo-
tion, it was perfealy well otiderliood on a night
when the Houk was very full, that the fubjea would
on an early day be brought under confidetation.
Mr. FOX fpoke againft the Motion. He denied
that any due parliamentary notice had been given on
the fubjea, and maintained that if the Houle were
thus to be taken by lurpaize, there would be an end
of all the dignity, the Ileainers, or the honour of
the proceeding: of the Houle. No decifion could be
fate—no difapprobation of the condua of a Minifter
could be recorded with advantage. All that a Mi-
nifter had to do was, only to wait till Members ex.
peeing all important bonnets to be pall, went to the
country, and then undo ail that the labours and at-
tention of the Seffion had accomplithed. In this cafe,
after a folemn decifion of the Houle, a whole week
elapfes, and after this interval, employed in ferious
meditation, it is determined that :on a notice ot
hours the HoOfe (hall be taken by flirptize, and this
decifion !hall be let. afide. It was raid, however, that
the notice was fair, and that theturnbzr of Members
Fnefent when the b.:liners was brought forward was
confiderable. To this the aufwer was ealy, and at
the fame time condoner. It was undeniable that
there wete not now, by mo::: than a hundred Mem-
bers, fuch an attendance as at the time the decifion
paired, which it was now propcled to refeind.—To
attempt fuels a thing as this was to infult the general
fink of that Houfe and the country, and was literally
proclaiming, that Lheir declared wifhesand views fhould
be countsraaed by a Minifler whenever it fuited his
purpoles: On the.fame principles, whatever was mull
(acted in public or private privileges might be rucceir-
fully invaded. A regular formal notice previous to the
istroduaion of loch a notice,was not only what jollice,
but what decency demanded. He preferred Impeach-
ment,but he did not with the Refolution of Parliament
to be let afide on light or frivolous grounds. He was
ready to admit, that even the made of proceeding by
impeachment was not withour its cbjation, and he
mentioned as one of thole, that of the Perrwwho
might be called on to try Lord Melville, there were
no leis than feventy cr eighty who owed their eleva-
tion to the joint influence of the Right Hon. Gentle-
man oppofite, and the Noble Lord, on whofe condo&
they were judicially to decide. The Houferltowever,
had molt gravely determined to proceed by criminal
profecution, and to that he now wifhed to adhere,
even though it was hinted, that hisHonourable Friend
near him, (Mr. Whitbread) (Wald he cottoned with
the principal man..gement of the impeachment. The i
RCP. Member obterved tarthet that, when he rceoll.l

lellea hold they had foughrinch by inch aga!nft al
proceedings whatever—who he confide; cd how the
meafure of this very evening aught, in all prohability,
be conneaed with further isroceedings that would
g) entirely to defeat the cods of punithinent, he
could not look on thole Gentlemen as the beft friends
to co-operate with them in a profecution of aliy de-
fceiption. Thercould entertain no rational hope of
co-operation or union from thole who had repeatedly
declared themfelvesenetnies to every mode of pro'e-
cution. Confidering the oppofition they had hitherto
(hewn to the whole hnfiuefs, it was not to be wonder.'
ed at if he Ihould feel jealous of the fincerity of their
prefent profetfions. But whether their objeft might
be to gain by that means a victory over their political
opponents, or more effeitually to defend Lord Mel-
ville, he found it his duty to oppofe it, as he was
neither a friend to the one ncr the other. The Hon.
Gentleman then adverted to the manner in which the
refolution propofed to be refcinded had paired. It
had paffed in toe fullelt Houle that ever he bad the
honour to fit in. How then could they propore to
refcind it in fo thin a Houfe as the prefent, however
relpeftable it might be, were no fuch comparifon in
queßion? Should fuch a barefaced propofition be car-
ried, it molt be impolfible there thould be any fuch
thing as Blame in the Houfe. Should it really be the
Intention of the Houle to entertain the queition, they
mutt poßpone it not till Monday only, but for three
weeks, and make a particular call of the i-loufe en
the occafion, on account of an unfortunate miltake
that his Majetly's Minifters made refpeding their !aft
vote on this fubjeft. Many Members who were now
not in town, might by this means be afrembled, and
affiß them to Teddy their miltake. In adverting to
fome of the arriments offered by the Attorney Ge.
neral, he inCfted that it was not the right of Peers to
be tried by their Peers; but in cafes of High Treafon
or felony. NI, loch potation was found en the laws
of this country. It was the butiners of the Attorney-
General, he contended, to look at the whole, cafe,
and to do his belt for the public, as he would for any
other client. He was no lawyer himfelf, and might
not therefore be qualified, nor was the Houfe fop-
pored to be qualified, to give him their advice. On
the contrary, they applied to him as a profelfional
man, and he was lure there was not a lawyer in Well.
mintier Hall, who could not; if afked, take up the
caufe. If thole Gentlemen were fo anxious for an
impeachment, why did they not vote for it before ?
or did they think they bad voted for the queltion
when, by miltake, they had been voting againft it,
and had therefore come to have thit vote refcinded ?
Whether their miltake was real or detigned, was not
this giving a charatter of uncertainty to the proceed.
ings of the Houle of Commons, totally° incontinent
with its dignity ? They ought betides to regard, with
great caution, thofe whom they had fo much rea-
son to raped of being enemies to the meafure alto-
gether. Mr. 'Fox concluded by moving the orders of
the day to be read.
Mr. HILEY ADDING"PON rote after Mr. Fox,
and raid that he thould plata the indulgence of the
Houfe but for a short time, having no inclination to
protraft the debate at that late hour. He could
not, however, feel fatisfied with giving a ,filent
vote, and hoped that Gentlemen would perceive
that; after having expreffed a decided opinion on
this fubjed on a former occafion, he muft naturally
be anxious to preclude the potfibility of a furpicion
that ahy alteration whatever had taken place in it on
reflealiin, or that he was difp"fed to Bantle from that
line which, as a Member cf Parliament, his duty im-
pofed on him on this import et °teal-ion. He Ihould
not detain the Houfe by refeating the grounds on
which he had borate Rated his preference to the mode
of proceeding 'by information ; but there- was one
point to which he could not help advetting,and which
had been touched upon in a way that he was fall
to hear by a Right Honourable Friend of his c Mr.
Pitt), namely, the greater lenity of this proceeding.
He Rill thought, as he had belie expreffed, that this
was the milder and more temperate of the two ;
and was fore that, in one point of view at leaft,
impeachment could not be argued to be the mint
lenient, the protrzftion of which might be at-
tended with fetch intolerable expence to the indivi-
dual, as experience had proved, and out of which ti,e
Noble Lord might come acquitted and ruined. He
thnuld not be doubted whet. he declared, that no man
in or out of the Houfe would more deeply grieve at
teeing that Noble Lord in the latter predicament, as
no one would more heartily rejoice at finding him
in the former. He agreed however with a propoll•
tion made by a Noble I. d H: Petty) eatly
in the debate, that this was not the proper time for
difeidling the met its or demerits of the different
modes of proceeding that had been recommended.
The notation was pait—An ample opportunity had
been given on the t ith and lath of June for the
dilcuffion; and it had been abundantly taken advan-
tage of. The quellion now was limply, whether a
B!itith Houfe of Commons thould ail up to its own
folemn difculUon, or thould incur the charge of in-
confittency and contradietion. What was there to
warrant the meaftute propofed ?—A worthy Baronet,
who had feconded the motion, had laid great firers
on the precedent eflabliflied, by reftinding the refo-
lution for the civil procefs? Had he forgot the
grounds on which that Ilep was taken ? It was not
only becau fe ne w mat ter, and that of a molt aggravating
and criminal nature, had rubfequently come out, Inv
becaufe a part of that matter had precluded the pot
tibility of that proceeding producing any refult.— ,
Was this then at all a cafe in point ? What new mat-
ter have we now to warrant the alteration propofed ?
What parliamentary grounds whatever had been
Rated, what faits, what documents had been pro-
duced, as affording a p • tence for it ?—His Learned
Friend had relied much on the circumtlance of a tingle
precedent ; but it would be reconciled that neither
he nor any one on his fide the Houfe, had at all re-
lied on-precedents, had not even mentioned them,
buthzd merely contended that the choice of the :node
was-a cluellina of expediency. He defied any Lawyer
in the Houle to prove that the proceeding by infor-
mation was not leriely contlitutional. One word
as td the notice given by his Learned Friend who
brought forward the queition, and whom no one
who knew -him could fume& of meaning deliberate-
ly to aft incorreilly on any potfible occafion :—lt
was defirable that both quellions Ihould be dircur-
fed on the lame.day.', The Chancellor cif :he Exche.
quer had undoubtedly given a tiring intimation of
as intention to revive the proceeding on Thinfday
, laft., but it was; nothing more; on that day his Right

Hoc Friend behind him had Led nn this day for h..
motiqa—why might not the Learned Gentlema::
have ptiven his notice on the fame day, or at any
rate on the Friday ? He could not help fte.rc ex.
pretling his furprife at an aiiertion made by the
Chancellor of the Exchequer, that no notice (4
Mr. Bond's amendment had been previoufly given to
?Jay individual ; if on recolietlion this was maintain.
ed, he Mould only fay, that he underftood it was
otherwife. He timid only add, that it was his mot;
anxious hope, that on this molt important Winds,
the Houfe would well confider what was due to its
dignity, to its conQaency, would relied on the poi.
bie confequences of ellabliflaing fo dangerous a pre.
cidene; and would, under theft impreffions, reject
the Motion now nn the table.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQJJER in
explanation Paid, that he only meant; that rio public
notice of the intended amendment had been given,
and none dived to Lord Melville.

Mr. DIJNDAS SAUNDERS thought the mode
of impeachment the molt preferable, whether the pee.
fon to be tried, or the ends of juftice to be anfwered,
were confidered ; and this was the mode to which the
Noble Lord himfelf gave the decided preference. Lord
Melville had fpoken againft both modes of proceed.
ing, and he could eafily account for it. If an ins.
peachment Mould have been agreed on, he coincided
with the Right Honourable Gentleman (Mr. H.
Addington), that even if the Noble Lord &mild
he found innocent, the expence would be ruinoui.—
Notveithltanding what had been' affirmed to site
contrary, he pofitivdy declared that Lord Mel.
vine was totally unacquainted with the mode of
proceeding intended to he adopted (he alluded to
the amendment). till within one hour before he
entered the Houfe. It would have been an alt of
courtefy. if not of juflice, particularly with parties
with whom the Noble Lord had a4lecl, to have given
him fome notice on the fubjcit. He did not think it
an r.ft of lenity to proceed again( Lord Melville, or
any body elk, in the manner which had been adopt.
ed. He left it to the convietion of thofe who voted
for the criminall profecution to confider whether they
thought it the moll lenient 'way or not.
Mr. KERR raid, that as 239 could not be made
out to be more than 231, he lhould, for the fake of
confiflency, vote for the criminal prnfecution.
The. queftion being fondly called for, the Houfe
divided—Fur the Order of the Day, 543—Againft it,
10—Majority, 23.
While the Chancelltr r• the Exchequer and his friends were
out in the lobby on the divillon, be gave them notice that probably
aftett the dafpofel of that; there might be a diviEnn on the main
1 quellem.—All his friends then returned with hint into the
When the Gallery was re-opened, Mr. rot w,rr :mind fpelking„
He Rated that the queftion then before the Houk, was of fu:h au
~prosot nature as to require the fulleft attendar cc poilible. He
therefore thought it his duty to move, that the queftion be ad-
jourued for a fortnight, in order to give time fora call of the Houfe.
The Gallery was again cleared ; but we underftand that the
Motion wis loft without a diviLon.

The queltion for an Impeaehment at the Bar cf the Mode or
4.ords was tbeo put and carried'without a dividon.'
After which,it was ordered, that Mr. Whitbread ibould go op
to the Lords, and acquaint them with the determination of dais
Houfe. The other Orders were then difpofed of, and the Hoofs
adjoirnad at a quarter part tiro.

LONDON.

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26. •

PRICE OF riven THIS DAY AT ONE .O'CLOCK*
Caddo, fat copg. $911,-;4teduce4 514-omniam, 4.

An interefting Debate took One laa night in lbe
Houle of Commons, upon Mr. LaTcairia's motion,
for fobftituzing an Impeachment in the place of a
Criminal Prolegution by the ATTORNEY GENERAL,
againft Lord Vifcount bliLvitr.Le. The motion was
carried by a majority of 166 againft

ThuTfday and Friday the following peifons con.
fined in Dublin Int. Ita•e offences, and under Secre-
tary's warrants, were admitted to bail before Ea-
wmtp Tasvna, Erg. one of his Majeay's jullices of
he Peace for the County of Dublin : •

Mlles Hanlon, Edward Scully. Matthew Dodd, William Kear-
ney, Michael Doyle, Nicholas Doyle Nicholas Rood, John Ed
wards, John Andrews, Patrick Maguire, John Mealy, Edward
Lynch, Michael Ni•Dantel, Junes Sweeny, and Thomas Whelan.
Sever sl more were directed by Mr. Tit siroz to pro-
cure relpe&tble bail.

F. own,Tit, juts 23.—Sailed the Carteret packer,
Captain PATTUSON, with a mail for the Leeward
Iflands. Wind Northerly. •

PLYMOUTH, JUlllt 24.—Came in a French chafre
maree, laden with brandy and wine, tkiken on the tit
intl. by the Adrian hired armed cutter—l/leis latt
trom Tenby ; alfo the Recommencement, Captain
KINDFRS, from DAntzick.-Sailed the CRESCENT, of
3: guns, on a cruize ; and the CstaaLorrif of so
guns, with a fleet to the liwns. •

PORTSMOUTH, JUNE "2S.—Arrived the THISSI
frigate, with a convoy from Guernfey. Wind 11.N.W..
DEAL, JUNE 25.—This morning the Right Hoe.
Admiral Lori KEITH (hilted his flag from the MO.
NARCH to the ST. ALBAN'S manof war : theMosoce
has fince failed for Sheernefs. Came down hum the
River the Diana, and the Sir Wm. Pulteney, 'out-
ward bound Eafl Intliamen. Came down from Sheer-
nefs, and failed for Dungenn.fs, the Sry flop of
war. Arrived the AItIAONE frigate, ORESTES and
SPIEFDT floops of war, DATASTATIOU, LUCIE ER, and
VOLCANO bombs, with feveral gun brigs, from off
the French coaft—Wind W. N. V.

Cn EXCHANGE,MARIE•LAIIe, Jima 26—The ritr-
ply of Wheat remaining on hand is large, with for:
arrivals of Foreign, chiefly feconds and inferior,
which continues with very little fale—S )me few fe-
left famples of fine old on Monday and to-day, fetch
rather more than our currency—Barley, with Malt,
have no particular •ariation—Beans of both forts,
and St bite Yeas are dearer, but few come to hand—
Oats are in great quantities, with come further accef-
form of Foreign, and are in general quoted Is. per
quarter cheaper —Flour without fluatra r ion.
GENERAL CURRENCY AS UNDER.
Wheat, 46.63 x. 88s. per qr. Grey Pare 425. tto 465.
Fine Ditto. gas. 965. od. Bans, 46s sas.
Ryc, 48$. sat. tad. Tick Ditto 425. 481. od

81+lei, 3007. 371. cd. Oats. 231 ata zos.
Malt, 641. 7os. od. Poland ditto, so. sts 61
White Yeah, 444. sm. ad. Rape Seed, oos. oes.
PRICE OF FLOUR.
Pine Floor 70. to 784 Seconds 6ss. to 754. pais*

LONDON : Primed and Pabbibed by LEVEL KENT (at C.
is:tinny-oam, Lambeth), at the STAR OrtiCt. No a, Car.
amt. Pabilibsil alto at the Sims Orrtcs, Tiogbir.