Star.
London, England, 1809-03-16 00:00:00

P--- - •,
•
is not to 'se obtained by doing duty well, but by eon- '
descending to every species of mea,nness to a woman
of this kind ? With regard to the case of Dowler, I '
think it involves a serious charge, as ik evident
it‘t.
that a place in the Commissariat was obta. through
corrupt influence with the Doke of York. 4o not
b slieve that such situation was in any degree pro-
cured by the interference of Sir Brook Watson Watson; for
it appears that Mr. Dowler's politics were altogether
contrary to those of that worthy Baronet ; and, be.
sides, it would he extraordinary that Sir Brook Wat-
son should think of giving that place to the son cf.
a person who had been opposing him. As to
French's levy, there is evidently something very sus
picious in it ; and, although it does not appear that
the Duke participated in the corruption, yet, I must
say, I am astonished he should have been so blind as
not to see that which every man must have seen.—
Only consider the evidence of Miss Taylor, confirm-
ed as it is by those letters and notes, especially those
written to Capt. Sanden, which, whether he were the
dupe or accomplice of Mrs. Clarke, shew there was a
continual courseofcorrespondence carrying on between
them, and that she was constantly receiving informa-
tion on military matters, and you will find it exceed-
ingly strong and corroborative of Mrs. Clarke's testi-
mony. If Capt. Sanden were actually the dupe, he could
in a moment have proved Mrs.Clarke'sstatement as to
influence to be false, by applying to the Duke of
York ; but so far from it, Captain Sanden kept ad-
vsncing money to her, from time to time, in order, 1,
as he hoped, to effect his purpose. Although there
be some contrariety in Mrs. Clarke's statement of the
conversation with the Duke, and that of Miss Taylor,
I think it sufficient still to force me to come to the
conclusion, that the Duke of York was privy to that
transaction, and therefore a participator in it. As to
the case of Captain Tonyn, I think the note produced i
relative to it, if it had been a forgery, would have had
more added to it, in order to produce the conclusions
intended to be drawn from it, without incurring the
risk of detection.—Considering that Captain Sanden
gave exactly the same account of it to Colonel Ha-
milton, at 'Portsmouth, originally, as he afterwards
gave at the Bar, I camiot but suppose that it was 1
the real fact, that the note was shewn some way
or other, although we might easily conceive that
some other pretence had been made to the Duke of
York for obtaining it. As to Capt. Turner's case, it
appears to me to give an idea that Mrs. Sutherland,
at the time of the application, had so great an in-
fluence over him, although in fact not living with
him, but with another, as to induce him to refuse re-
signation to an officer, whose military character was
well known. If then he were so much led away by
Mrs. Sutherland, when not living with her, how much
more probable was it, that he would be led away by
the fascinating charms of the one with whom he
lived ? ( Hear ! Hear !) 1 own frankly that my view
of the case is this, that notwithstanding all that has
been said by the Right Hon. and Learned Gentlemen
on the other side, the amendment that has been
proposed by the Honourable Member below me (Mr.
Bankes), does exactly state my conviction as to the
conduct of the Duke of York. It is evident that
the Duke could not avoid suspecting that such
practices existed. It was a good deal like the general
' conviction and feeling of a nnin, who knows that his
affairs are going into a had state; he is always afraid
that he is spending too much money, but he does not
choose to look into his affairs, so that he almost per-
suades himself that he can go on living as he has
dime. Any one who knows the nature of the hu-
man mind must know, that it is very possible for a
person to have that sort of sensation we are now
speaking of. I cannot say I know of all these corrupt
practices particularly ; but Igo as far as I can in ac-
quitting his Royal Highness, and I should be rather
led to agree with the motion of my Hon. Friend,
than acquit him altogetlatr. It has been said, that
it would be more manly to come to a direct charge
of guilt ; but it is because they think it would be more
easy to persuade the House to retract. I am as old a
soldier as any of these Learned Gentlemen, and am
fully aware of the tricks that are practised in this
House.—(Hear. hear, !rear!) That is most manly
which really expresses the conviction of our under-
standing. His Royal Highness having put himself,
by their advice, in the situation he now stands before
us, that makes it impossible for me to do otherwise.
It is a situation which I, in common with all others, de-
plore. At one time, it was said to he a plot ; hut
I cannot think there is any proof whatever that it has
been so ; for it is remarkable that Mrs. Clarke was
u; on bad verms witli most of the witnesses brought to
the Bar, such as Donovan, Sanden, Maltby, Nichols,
and Mrs. Sutherland This circumstance does away
all suspicion that it was a plot. But the strongest of
all evidence in confirmation of Mrs. Clarke's testi-
mony, is to me the Duke's letters, both because they
are a species of evidence justly esteemed, and were
written at the time these transactions were going on.
Fite did not know they were in existence. Of Colonel
C.,-,rdon, Colonel Brownrig, and General Calvert,
none can speak more highly than 1 am disposed to
speak. I can never forget the effect produced when I
saw Colonel Gordon at the Bar, called upon to state
whether that mysterious note was of the Duke of York's
Land-writing ? There was a dignity, simplicity, and
determination on his part to do his duty, which con-
duct, however painful it might be to him, one could
not but in the highest•degrce'respect. If the Duke of
York had stated to those Gentlemen, that he ap-
prehended Mrs. Clarke was irregularly interfering
with army promotions, I am sure they would, when
called to your bar, have stated fairly, that such warn-
ings had been given ; for the real fact is, that the
soldiers and sailors of this country, at the same time
tl at they have strong bodies, have vigorous minds.
It is this and the nature of the British Constitution,
that makes every one cf them feel himself a man of
consequence. 1 have merely spoken of that part cif
the evidence which slims that many suspicions must
have rested on the Duke's mind, as to these corrupt
practices ; and 1 cannot go the length of acquitting
him of all
,connivance. Undoubtedly Ido free him
from any real knoodedge, amounting to participation
i that corruption ; and it gives me the sincerest sa-
osfaction to do so. Besides this, it is absolutely ne-
cessary to make that reparation to tie wounded mo-
r lity of the country, which we can only effect by
xpressing 7.11 opinion, that the command of the army
". annot any longer remain in the hands of his Royal
Flightless the Doke of York." He concluded by im-
I Loring the House to co4sider, that the sa!ety of the
( entry depended oil thei(Liccision.

• • . . .
. . ,
Mr. Secretary CANNING- kid-, that however he Friend lad fVf6poSeCi Resolutions, and thought it them against popular clamottr ; no one agt?ci r_ .
disagreed with the Honourable Gentleman in manh would be further necessary to lay the decision of the • than he did in the opinion that popular cli:e ~
points, yet he most cordially agreed with him in House,before his Majesty, . who would thereby be en- should be guarded against ; but the House m2;0:: j
this, that in the vote they were to give to-night, the / abled to see what steps had been taken by the House; consider, that this case, of all others, the edues ,;
character and honour of that House *ere most deeply I and it could not but be highly satisfactory to the feel- part of the community, was qualified to deride ; e.,,;:
...
engaged. He hoped that the. House and the Right 1 ings of his Majesty, who, during the whole course of ought to consider that they had sent aiithentic cnree
Hon. Gentleman would believe, that although he i a long and amiable reign, had evinced towards the abroad, and that the educated part of the cometueity
took a very different view of the question, yet his I Country such paternal feelings. ; were in the habit of acting as Jurymen., and conk
vote should be determined by the conscientious opinion, Mr. TIERNEY rose. to order, and said that the fluently competent to decide upon evidence , • • 1,
,„ yeee.
which he had formed after the most attentive consi- Right Hon. Gentleman was then using the Ktng's they ought nnt to suffer the prejudices of the conVe
&oration of the evidence. The debate had now conti- name for the purpose of influencing the House, which pity to interfere with, or influence their e,peeme, ye,.
nued for an unexampled length of time, and had been was contrary to the Orders ofehe House. I their just judgments ought to be respected. ti.
conducted with unexampled ability. He had waited Mr. CANNING proceeded, and observed that both thought that the case was fully proved, and drat ei,
with patience, and a sincere desire to collect from other the Addresses were highly objectionable. 4 In one of , could not in justice decide that the Comneteeer i:,
Gentlemen materials to enable him to come to the them, that of his Honourable Friend (Ms. Bankes), Chief was not guilty.
most correct judgment which his mind could enable there was a mistatement in the very beginning. The , Mr. TIERNEY made some nbservetions epee ti,
him to form on the subject. Of all the speeches which Committee had sat six weeks to enquire into the con-' mode on which the diiii,ion should take place ; lee.
he had expected to hear upon the subject, there was duct of the Duke of York—the House had been sitting the House becoming most clamorous for to ws.
none for which he had waited with more anxiety than six days to consider what way they should communi- ! tion, strangers were ordered to withdraw.
for the speech of the Honourable Gentleman. He cate their sentiments on that conduct, and yet the [While the division was taking place, ibe Cl; Ny.
had looked to his speech as one, from which ]le ex- name of the Duke of York was not once mentioned in CELLOR of the EXCHEQUER addrerspd 0.,
petted that all party views would be entirely banished that Address. In the whole history of Addresses, such Members. in the lobby, and stated to them t;: It r.
He was sure that the Honourable Gentleman would a one as this had never been framed by the heart of , first division went only to determine the beer of t!,,..
not practise any management, or feel or express . man, nor had the like ever before been presented to proceedings. The next question would dieeeee„
himself like a Parliamentary tactitian, on such a : the House. It said no more nor less than this—" We t'ie fa:e eii Colonel Wardie's Motion, aed if it ~..:
day as this. He thought, however, that he would ; believe him to be guilty, hut if he should happen'to ne eitived, he would then propose the se.ceee „f I,;c
not have entered into any compromise upon •such., be innocent, we will still punish him as if guilty." Resolutious, having waved the first. The manner it
an occasion, or have given his support to an address He hoped, however, such an address of alternatives which that second Resolution was carriecleesuidaceee
which had no character at all. ( Hear ! hear ! ) The would not be permitted to stand on the Journals of whether ti e Dte:e of York, was guilty or not? He
Address Which was proposed, pronounced nothing re- the House. The Hon. Gentleman who brought. for- wai'd afterwards propose, if his second Resoletio,
specting the question which they had been so long • ward the charges had devised one of his own ; but he w.ts carried, to adjourn the consid:ratien of the mile,:
investigating, whether the Duke of York was guilty had suffered others to interfere, and to inoculate or t, another dray. In every case it was highly desirable
or dot? It appeared to him, that the decision of the vaccinate it with matter of their producing, whiclT had that they should come to a conclusion on the re„,,
House ought to direct the opinion of the public in- warped it from its natural purpose, and made it differ i question before they parted ; it was probable seeeee
stead of following the stream of popular opinion. It from itself. Some of those who had thus interfered, I divisions would take place ; he trusted no Membe,
was by rightly discharging their duty, that true and might have inherited their presumption and pertina. I would go away* until they were all decided.]
lasting popularity was to be hoped for. What was city by an inheritance of the splendid vices of one I The List division was on the quesdon, whether tee
it, however, that the Honourable Gentleman had of the mistresses of Charles 11. The question was 1 House should proceed by Address or Reseleeoe f.,,,..
stated as his opinion ? He had told the House, that not, that the Committee should enquire into the 1 [This decided the fate of Mr. BANKEs's arnendmeeel
after the fullest consideration of the evidence, and Abuses and corruptions of the Army, but into the For proceeding by Address - - 199
after six days had been spent in debating the subject, conduct of the Duke of York. This address, how- For proceeding by Resolution - - t.. 94
lie had not been able to give a decided opinion ever, shirked the question, and shifted it to the abuse.
whether the Duke had been guilty of corruption or which might have existed before the Duke of York was
not. This was then the result of six days' debate, and born. It had been said, that Ministers encouraged
this was all the opinion pronounced by the Right Hon. , this open mode of proceeding that had been pur- 1
Gentleman, to whose opinion the largest number of sued. He was one that did so, because he thought
people looked up to fashion theirs. It he was not pre- that proceeding would lead to impeachment, and not
pared to give a decided opinion on the guilt or inno- ; that by restoring the SPEAKER to the Chair, they
cence of his It( yell Highness, bethought that it would should proceed from the character of inquisitors to
have been better for him not to have gone into those those of judges. He did not repent of that proceed-
comprehensive and general views which rather encum- i ing, because, whatever steps the House might take,
bered and perplexed the question, thanplaced itinany ! it would appear to the public, that they wished the
itew light which would have been able toguide the house . truth to be fully and fairly investigated. From the
in their determination. After stating the immorality ; case of Lord Falkland to that of Lord Melville, the
of the connection which was disclosed, the Honour- course of that House had always been to proceed by
able Gentleman asked, would it not be a scandal and wayof resolution, and then an address; bet an address
a shame to that House not to come into Resolutions 1 with a Resolution, he thought highly unjust. It had
which would disgrace the Commander in Chief? For , been said the other night, by a great Grandee of the
his part, he doubted much whether the House had I House of Commons, tilling himself an independent
any right to consider more about the immorality of I country Gentleman, that Gentlemen in office were
this connection than as related to its practical effects I not to be believed. On such declarations, he should
as to the administration of that department in the always look with sovereign contempt. He conceived
State which had been confided to his Royal High- ; it to be the fair inference, of what would have been
nest. . He considered that religion, as well as mo- i the conduct of the man who said it, had he been in
rality, was best judged of by its practical effects ; i office. It was not a glass that reflected others, but
and until a deviation from religion and morality i a glass that reflected himself. He was the last man
had produced serious evils to the State, he did not ! who would wish to have any deference paid to the
know that Parliament should be called upon to I Duke of York on account of his rank, but in propor-
interfere by its censure. As to the Address origi-; tion as they acted consonant to the principles ofjus-
nally proposed, lie must dissent from it, because ; tice, posterity would look on them, and he would wish
lie did not agree with the averments of it ; but at the 1 the decision to be such, as should do honour to the
same time he thought it had this great advantage over ; justice and dignity of the House.
the Address moved in its place, that it was much I Lord FOLKESTONE, in explanation, begged to
more direct and intelligible. The Address, however, ; make an observation or two on some words that had
which was moved in its place, was complicated and I fallen from the Right Hon. Gentleman in the course
confused in a high degree. It blended all manner of iof his speech. What he had stated on a former night
questions together. It took in something of religion, lon the subject of the word infaruy, was from what he
something of connivance, something of the immoral• understood the Right Honourable Gentleman tet have
ity of the connection, and formed a sot-Leif average said on the commencement of die inquiry. The Right
upon all that was in any way objected to the Duke, Honourable Gentleman had this evening given ano-
without coming to any decision upon what was really I ther ground on which he rested it, instead of the head
the charge against him, namely, whether hewasguilty of his Honourable Friend. He had certainly been in
of corruption or riot ? This conduct would not he just error, and he was sorry the Right Honourable Gen-
to the iliustrions personage who was the object of the
~ tleman had not taken an earlier opportunity of men-
accusation,nor kind towards theSovereign,wbo would tioning it, as he then should have escaped the using
be called upon to punish his son before he should be , the language he had done upon it. With respect to
found guilty Comparing the present times with other ! another allusion which went to the situation of an an-
times, all that should be asked for the Duke of York' cestor of his in the reign of Charles 11. long before
was, that he should not be considered more than arm- the person who gave him being was born ; it would
ther person, but that on account of his rank he should; be ridiculous in him to seem not to know who was
not be made a sacrifice. These charees, in the shape I glanced at in what had been said ; but he begged
of accusations, accused the Duke of York with having I leave to state to the Right Honourable Gentleman
been personally corrupt. The Hon. Gentlemen say, , and to the House, that every inquiry and investiga-
,there is no record ; he wished the matter to be inves_ ' tion had then been made into the truth or falsehood of
tigated fairly, not by a spirit of charge and a vote of the report of that connection, and the result was, there
compromise. The Address of his Hon. Friend did . was never any warrantable proof of it ; and though the
not mean to infer corruption or criminal connivance, ' ALNIIGIITY had thought fit in the plenitudeothis!wrath
but was built selely on suspicion, and both Addresses .4‘ to visit the sins of the father upon the children, to the
contained considerations of expediency and prudence, ' third and fourth generation," he did not conceive the
more than any spirit of justice. The Duke of York Right Hon. Gentleman would have arrogated the
had been accused of base and wilful corruption ; he right to do so. He would say nothing of the justice,
had also been assaidtedby minor charges,and he wished the moderation, the candour, and the decency of its
only to have a fair opportunity of proving his inno- ' coming from such a person as the Right Honourable
cence by a fair and impartial trial. The judgment of , Gentleman ! (Order, Order, Order ! )
his Peers was one of the highest privilege,: of an English I The SPEAKER mildly referred it to thegood sense
subject, and surely his Royal Highness is fully =titled ' and good temper of the Noble Lord, to consider whe.
to his share of that right. Justice lie can only h:tve'by slier this was not studiously personal, and if sa, whe-
the House coming to a decision on a Resolution of flier it ought not is be dropt ?
Guilty or Not Guilty ; and he was astonished how I Lord FOLKSTONE then put the matter to the
the Honourable Gentlemen could reconcile it to their candour, judgment, impartiality, and moderation of
minds to lumpeall these considerations together. The the House, to consider of the decency of the allusion
grave charge of corruption the House ought fairly to of the Right Hon. Gentleman, which made these
decide upon ; and he thought, if censure should be , observations necessary—(Order, order! Chair, chair,
found necessary, it would be better conveyed by a Re- - chair le)
solution than an Address, a mode which could not I Mr. BATHURST said a few words, but a loud
fail to wound the feelings of his Majesty. A Noble ' cry of " question" prevented their being heard.
Lord had, on a former night, spoken with some as-' Mr. PONSONBY said, that lie would trouble the
perity on what had fallen from him on the outset of House with but a very few remarks ; he was the more
this inquiry. He owned he did say that infamy must encouraged to offer them, as the Right Honourable
rest somewhere, but he did not say it must fall on the Gentleman had abstained from ill personality, and
bead of the accuser. He meant that infamy must re set an example of such fair reasoning.—(Hear, hear!)
on that confederacy to which the Honourable Gen- He wondered how any one could think the Duke of
tleman had been, he had no doubt, an unwilling : York not guilty of connivance, after the evidence they
instrument. He would not say whether the Honour- i had heard. The letter upon the case of Tanyn he
able Gentleman was to be praised or blamed for considered indisputable ; if they did not agree that he
whet he lied done ; that was between Goo and him- was guilty of corruption himself, yet they must ad-
self --that he had done any national good, he could . mit that he was subject to an influence interfering
not agree. Whether it was right to lfave brought with the public service. The transaction with Kennet
foewo: .1 die charges in the present instance, it wasior was one of personal convenience to the Commander in
himself alone to determine. He (Mr. Canning) Chief. It was mentioned in the letter from Mr. Kennet,
rliouAlit die Honourable Gentleman ought to have that if he obtained the situation, he would. be able o
been
sure that he was proceeding on just grounds, procure a loan for the Duke of York ; there was ever}'
and could prove the several facts he had so courage- reas-en to believe that that letter was laid before tht
otoly broeght forward. If the Honourable Gentle- Commander in Chief, yet they did not find that a corn-
;
:11•t's opinions were to be adopted by the House, it municationwas discentinued in consequence of it. The
otil;la to be
.11 Resolutions. His Hight Hoeourable Honourable Member' wile spoke last, had warned

Majority against Mr. BANK Es's amended addrcii 95
A second division then took place on Came!
WAIIDLIeS 11106011:
For it 123
Against it - 564

Majority against Colonel WARDLE'S motion '241
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, we under.
stood, having declined to press his Resolution at thlt
hour, it was agreed to adjourn the farther cons;dera•
tion of the Inquiry into the Commander in Chief's
conduct till Friday ; the House to meet on the inter.
vening day as usual for the transaction of the ordi•
nary business. The next q•testion cn the subject of
the Inquiry will be on the Resolution in favour of the
Duke of York, proposed by the Chancellor cf
Exchequer—Adjourned at six o'clock (this mc,rning.)

RIARRIED.

Tuesday last, at St. Margaret's Church, WermiLi,ter. Li-ute-
nant Colonel Barclay, of the setd Regiment of font, to Alks
belks Colquhoun, second slaughter of P. Colquhoun, Esq. k.f
James-street, Westminster.

,•
I '0 BE SOLD, pursuant to a Decree cf the Higl.l
-I- Court of Chancery, made in a taus t, Nvhen2in Thon.ss
Morris and others are Plaintiffs, and Lanes Clarkson and anoth.:l
are Defendants, with the approbation of Robert Steele,
of the Masters of the said Court, in three Luts-- A Variable Co-
pyhold Estate of Inheritance situate at Child's Hiil, within the
rish and ivtanor of Hendon, in the County of r,liddlesex, ad-
joining each side of the Road leading from Hampstead Heath to
the I dgeware Road, containing about ti.l Acres of Land, wiz
the Family House, Orchard and Garden, tortler with the Po.-
tery, Sheds and Buildings appertaining to the Manufactory,
tt.e Sheds for stalling Cattle, Cow-house, Coach-ho.,se, anl
Staples ; and also the Castle, Public House, and the several other
Noes s, Gardens, Meadows, Lands, and Premises, late the prr-
per y of Samuel Morris, late of Child's Hill aforesaid cite aced.
N. B. The above-mentioned Lands produce the be earth fc:
making Sugar-bakers moulds, pots, jars, red rubbers, paving-
bricks, tiles, red stocks, grey stocks, chimney pots, tg.tc. Th •
time, and Place of bale will shortly he advertised, whcn P:tri:o-
lars may be had (gratis) at the said Master's Chambers, in Sotrii•
ampton Buildings, Chancery lane, London ; of Mr. Annesley,
Solicitor, Hare-court, Temple ; of Mr. Battyc, Solicitor, Chan-
cery-lane; and of Mr. Clark, Solicitor, Holborn-court, Cray's.
Inn, London.

FOR. SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION,

At the London Inn, Foxhole-cr,er, Plymouth, on Theilty the

2: sf of March,
THE FRENCH SLOOP SUPERB.—Lc";,,,:I
deck 33 feet 6 inches ; breadt4 19 test ; dtpth b trt:
inches; admeasures 93 tons.
This Vessel is a handsome model, is esnaper,d, and :ail:: fast ;
is well found in stores, and may he sent to Rea at a truing
ett-
pence; condemned as prize to his Majesty'. ship NAL.tf,,
I)undas, Esq. Commander, and NARCISiI:S, Ch. Mal.ohn, Esq
Commander.
After which, her CARGO, consisting of, fur Er.portatic,n,
165 Barrels Flour I 8 Casts Fruits
47 Pieces Corday„. 77 Casks Hams and Potted
48 Bars Iron Mea's
uo Casks of Butter 3 13ailt2ts S2usage;
12 Cases Glass Wale 12 Cases Pipes
30 Bales Coffee Bags A quantity of I'•;ts
. 2 Ditto 83:.1cloth 8 Barrels Hair l'owd-x
I 2 ,Ditto Britannias 6 Bales Canvas
69 Cases Lard and Tallow 1 Case Potnatura
60 Baskets O'ive Oil 2 Cases Bars
50 Casks Nails And sundry other Caods.

And theft the French schooner le CENFR.VI. JUNO l'of 63
Tons. This vessel is well found, sails fast, aud condemned as
prize to his Majesty's sloop RA Lawn, H. J. fur 1, EA. Com-
mander. Also her Cargo, destined fur Guadaicupa, cousistini, or,
for Exportation-
-175 Barrels Inir
608 Coffee Bags
90 Casks Butter
6 Cases Cheese
B Ditto Candles
5 Cases Tobacco-pipes
5 Bales •f Cloth
2 Ditto Piper
38 Sacks of Peas, green and
yellow
14 Casks Lard

6 Cases I lairs
4 Casks Twin:: and Lines
4 Bales, containitlg 1 able Li-
nen and If trylkerchicfs
3 Bal-.!s ..t Shirts
I Bale Thread
'2
Casts Mercury
I Case Medicines
2-Bales French Baoks
I Case I lilts, tic.

After which will be SOLD the good brig HURON, of ahout
160 Toils, condemned as prize to his Majesty's ship TRIM:NY,
TIiOMAS BAKER, Esq. Commander ; and the plicate slip of war
MARS, VINNICOSIBE Commander.

For viewing, Inventories, and other particulars, aprly to VV.=-
t .lANI PRUCTeIit SSIIIII, Esq. George-street, Dud., or to
JAMES SI.ADE, is Plymouth.
Plymouth, February QS, 1809.

And immediately after will be Sold,
The French Chaloupe le PRUDENTE, of about twenty Tong,
perfectly new, and well found, captured by his hlajesty's
CoN rEs r, Lieutenant GREGORY Conwiand(r.
Also her CARGO, consisting of, for E‘port dion,
25 tasks Honey—.so Ditto Sardinian.—Arply abuvr.

11G11 WATER AT LONDON n"IDGF TO-MORROW.
Morning - - 31 minutes after
Afternoon - - s minutes after 9

.ONDON: Printed and Published by LEVEL KEN I,ot an.
terbury Place, Lambeth, a the STA it-Orrlcir, No. 1.
Carry
street Atthlibited also at the S TAz -0 Vlr ir Tetnric Par.