Star.
London, England, 1814-09-08 00:00:00

CHAMBEII OF DEPUTIES.

snllmo OF THE 3D SEPTEMBER.

The Abbe de MONTESQUIOU informed the Chamber
that the King, by a Declaration of that day, had
consented to the Amendments proposed by the Cen-
tral Committee. The Minister added, that his Ma-
jesty had judged it proper to substitute for the word
intereth, used in Art. 26, to designate the premium
of 8 per cent. attached to Cie royal obligations, the
word inlinniSet, as expressing snore accurately the
intention and object of this part of the Pnancial plan.
An interest supposes a is an, and here the Creditors
lend nothing. It is a delay which the Government
proposes to the Creditors, and- for this delay it is pro-
per to grant some indemnity. Tile only change in
the article was, the substitution of iaainuity fur
interest.

A motion was made for sending it to the Durcanx.
M. DUMOLARD.—I demand to be heard respecting
the execution of the 46th Article of the Constitutional
Charter.

The PRESIDENT (M. Laine).—You may be heard
when the Assembly shall have find the mode of de-
liberating on the projet.
M. DUNIOLARD insisted.
The PRWDENT.--• I cannot alloy: you to speak.
M. DUMOLARD.—I demand it in the name of the
Constitution.

The PRESIDENT.—The extent of a di,scussion, in
whiz!) the Chamber has taken so keen _an interest,
renders it necessary to take a retrospect cf the pro-
gress and the results of it.
The Chamber will take the amendments into con-
sideration before deliberating on the principal ques.
tion. Some of these amendments have been proposed
by the Committee and adopted by the King ; these
ought to constitute a part of the projet. Others have
been proposed by different Members in the course of
the discussion. Were these to be considered as amend-
ments ?-I'he President went successively over the
different amendments proposed, and concluded thus
44 Are we to deliberate on the amendments consented
to by the King, as forming a part of the proposed
law ? Ought we to adopt the previous question re-
specting all the ether amendments ? Shall we deli-
berate article by article ?"
M. CASENAVE declared that he cenidered it his
duty to claim the execution of the 40th article of the
Constitution, by which all Amendments proposed,
and agreed to by the King, ought to be sent to the
Bureaux. The Amendments could ouly be consi-
dered AS modifications of proposed laws, and not, as
has been pretended, to laws made and adopted. He
wished the division of the titles of the Projet as more
favourable to the freedom cf voting ; for, said he; if
I am obliged to vo e on the totallily of the Projet, I
aleclue diet I shad give a hostile vue ; whereas I
should vote sep p.-atc,y for the Budget of 151.1, un
Account of in urgency admit that of 1515, if a di-
_ Titinuti:.,o in the centimes be agreed to; and reject
• the mode of liquidation of the ariters, as contrary to
the public interest.

hi.Dumca.Ano declared, rv-t w:tat had fallen
from the preceding speaker, he had main further
to sae. _ _

• M. MOTWIETIX D'OntEn thought all the parts of
the Preiet were intimately connected together and
inseparable.
M. PRUNfLE was of a contrary opinion.
• M. DUNIOLARD continued to demand ti:e sending
the amen:lt:ems to the Bureuar. Gentlemen (added
this speaker), the plan •on which You are about to
pronounce, is •of the greatest importance. It will
hive a great influence on all France, on its agricul-
tural riches, on all the means of reproduction. I
cannot be too prompt in determining. I declare that
I have not even had time to read the different 04-
nions which were certainly ordered to be printed fur
our consideration. In the name of the Cf•nstitutional
Charter I demand that the Amendments be sent to
the Bureau; and that there be an adjournment for
four days.
M. LAILMIDE opposed this demand. He demanded
the previous cvestinn on ail the amendments.
M. Sittna.ox was astonished that any one could
propose to reject the amendments en masse.
M. Bowfin wished the deliberation on the whole of
the law.

M. Ilf.noc said, the best manner would be to del
berate on etch Amendment. '

M. Coura denimided the voting article by article,
by rising and sitting.
M. FLAUGERGUES said, this form of the law ought
to pissed bekre the modification.
M. ()Limn wished the previoiss question to be
put.
M. DITON r opposed the voting en masse on the
different amendments.

The PRESIDEST said the rule required the previous
question to have a preference to every thing; and
this was without inconvenience, as it was in the
p/,wer of each Memb!r to reject tile previous ques-
tion. 'the next course was to decide whether they
w )old deli:crate, Article by Article, commencing
w.th the ameminiznts, and passing from them to the
vote on ►itie projzt ?
The Pre,i,!ent havin' successively put the three
queti:lnc in the way laid down by him, the Chamber
decided on voting on r►,e amendments agreed to by
the King ; 111‘,..y rejected the previous question, and
they pronclinc:Jd in favour of the deliberation, Ar-
ticle by Article.
The seven first Articles were adopted almost with-
out discussion. _ _

A very lively discussion took place on Article 8.
The &eject of the Amendments was to lower tne Cen-
times to 6t), 50, 45, and some so kw as 30.

The question of priority was given to the fixation
of 50 Centimes, and the Article, thus amended, was
adopted.
The Article 26, relative to the indemnity, was

submitted to discussion.
M. Dustotam proposed the reduction from 8 to
6 per cent.
The previous question was demanded. Two trials
were successively doubtful, and they proceeded to
A Si!Mq scrutiny. The result was, that of 229

'voiefs, 122 reJccted the Alma: mat, and the Ankle
26 was adopted.
Article 31, relative to the Forests, was carried by
a considerable majority.
The PRESIDENT declared that the projet of the law
respecting the finances, was adopted.
The Sitting was adjourned to Monday.