Star.
London, England, 1807-02-10 00:00:00

&e.

MORDER OF MR STETLF.
Yetlerday Ikneuy and Owen lia.wrly wereeit.
ambled at the Police Oflice, in Wortbip ftreet, for the firft time.
though this was the third examinatioi, on the charge of murder-
ing Mr Steck, on the 6th of hlovent'ser, ana.
There was a great body of evidence adduced, none of which
tended materially to criminate the prifoners, except that of Ben-
jamin Hai:field, who was para.:fp, trinriwli, and whit, under the
proniire of pardon, had turned King's evidence. He need the t
the priloner Holloway. about the month of Oetober tR a 4 MC
to hint, a:td anted him if he had sit hiciiitation to earn a little mo-
ney. in a manner that would eat him very little trouble. He told
him, he knew of a man who cooltantl I naffed Hour:flow Heath
every morning, with a conliderahle quantity of money shoot hi; 1;
and if he (Hanfield) would et me with him and his compa- o
Hawrty, he had no doubt of maki^g it worth his while i
field having no shjedl ion he appointed a meeting at the Black Horfe
' pablic hoof; a io Dvott ftreet, St. Giles's. where they fettled mat-
ten for the accomplifhment of their Oka. They agreed a..conl-
iogly to earrytheir plan ititotifeet on the Satu•dayevening following.
when Mr. Steele &oat be rrturni:.g home from his hook at Fel-
thim to London. They let out on aarttrday morning early, and
proceeded to Hounflow, where thq waited in ambulh until the
rime Mr. S. ufually departed for town. It was about tight o'clock,
the Moon (hone very brightly. when Holloway cried out, • here
is the nun,' and defining Hanfield to demand Mr. S's money:
witnefs accordingly went up to Mr. Steele,and demanded his mo.
ney which he gave, and begged the prifoners would not treat him
ill. but fuller him to depart. The money lie gave not fatillying the
prifoners. Haggerty (wore with a trentetuloui oath, that it he did
not immediately deliver up his pocket book, he thould fuller the
eanfequences of rtfufal, and at the tame moment, ...tint fs law Mr.
Steele knocked down by a blow front heltind, which he believes
came from HuEoway. The founo of e:-.rriage wheels at that time
fu n.ucb alarmed witnef., that he ran away towards l.oadon, and
left the prifoners to complete tl.eir blond.; intentions He heard
repeated cries of murder !' and (literal d.ifinal groans, as he fled
fro.ut his companiont.. About an hour af'ter, the prifoners over-
took bean on his way to London, and upbraided him with being a
white livered coward,' i.nd that he mutt not expect to partici-
pate in the fpcils, as he did not elate is the danger. The prifoner
Hollenka) f .id •he h4cl done his bufinefb.' They then parted for
the night, and on the morrow they ma again in El)ott-ftreet,
wheu %vitae!s of (erred that Holloway had a grange hatand boots
on. tipon examining the hat. he perceived the Lame of Steck t t
the lining upon which he adviled I-folkway to make away with
it, as it might lead to a difeovery, and they would be all taken up.
Holloway accordingly filled the hat with !tones, and threw it it.to
the !lames, front Weftminllce Bridge. This was the material
parts of flat:fieA'. evidence.

Chrittoplier Jones, foreman to the late Mr. Steele, Cad, that on
the 6th of November, Mr. Steele left his houfe at Feltham, a little
before eight o'clock, in a drah great coat and hoots, both which
were now produced, and which he proved to be thole worn by Mr.
Steele on the above night.
Hagbes, the officer, identified the coat, which he took from Mr.
Steele's body ; he found it concealed ender a mound of earrh,
amongft a clump of trees, near the Pacleborfe public houfe on the
Heath. Part of the coat was expofed above ground, and near the
body was a• old foldicr's hat,which Halifield laid had been worn '
that day by Holloway.
John Smith, who on the night in queftion, drove the Gofport
coach pall the Heath. hated, that about eight o'clock he diftinetly
heard two deep groans, feerningly thole of Tome perfon dying, at a
(bort didance behind him—but he drove on as he had frequently
heard timilar noires upon the Heath at nights.
Alice Foot, es ho refutes at Feltham, and was returning home, a•r
'Mick paffenger in the coach, i r Ated that the .Ifo heard the 8111111 ,
Timothy Lane, a watchman of St.-Cliks's pules, fald he had
known the prifuner Holloway for feveral years, and frequently law
him and Hagger:y together at different public houfes iu St. Giles's,
where they lived with two prottitutes.
Gai,rge Holmes. Serjeant of the sth Battalion of Marines, hid
he had known Ha. gerty eight or nine years, and bad calked him
as a foldier, about a year and a half Brice.

A number of other witneffes, plaifterers, bricklayers, cow-kee•
pen, ga rdeliers,&c. proved their baying em ,toyed Haggerty, at difi.
fercts• times, as a 11%ouring man, but could fay notisitig of hi* (ha-
ratter. It appeared that he was employed in the vicinity of Houn-
flow for tome days previous to the murder.
Mr. Britten, a fhoemaker, of Brydges-ftreet, Covent Garden
who ufed to make Mr. Steek's (hoes and boots, being (hewn a pair
of worn out dirty (hoes, which were fouLd upon the feet of Mr.
Steele when his body was difenvered, laid they were not of his
make, and that they teemed much too large for Mr. Steele; and
Hanfield (wore thefe were the lhoes of Holloway.
A number of other witneffes were examined, who proved no
circumftances direttly bearing on thefaet.
_ _ .

appeartd that Fianfi.ld, a confiderable time fubfequrnt to the
murder. was rorividtd at the Old Bailey ..f grand larceny, and
fentenced to fever years tranfportation. Hewes conveyed on board
a hulk at Woolwich, to await his conveyance to New South
Wales ;'and having been fuddenly taken with a revere illnefs,and
tortured in his mind by tl•.e recolledion of the murder about
which he con•inually raved, he laid he wilted to make a dffeovery
before be died. A meff.ge was fent to the Police Magiltrates, is
communicate the circundtanee. and an Officer was fent to bring
him before thou. they fent him, in the cuftody of the Officer ,
to Heunflow Heath, when he pointed out the fatal fpot where the
murder was perpetrated, and related all the eireuniftanees which
he alletled to have attended it.

The ;droners, in their defence, (till pofitively perfilted in deny-
ing all knowledgeof the tranfat.ction, and fervently writhed that pat
nithment might fall on the guilty. They adduced no evidence.
Mr. Mosea, whole diligence in the haveßigation merits ►igh
commendation, after deliberating with his brother Magiftrates
upon the whale evidence, fully committed the prifoners to hiLw.
gate, to take their trials at the neat Old Balky hellions.
MAaasottottett svaarr.—Yefterday H. Dickfun, a hackney
coachman, who was charged with bring an accomplice in a burg-
lary committed in the hunk of Mr. Hammet, near Lambeth
Church, on Sunday fennight. underwent a final examination; in
the courfe of which, the charge was ftrengthened by tour additional
witricirea ; three of whom (wore, they were upwards of two hours
in the Bell public-houfe in Church-ftreet, in couvertation with
him. Previous to his leaving the honk, two men entered the
tap roam, and called for porter and bileuits, and afterwards a third
apieared, with a large bundle. The four perfous rat and drank
together, and on the man having the bundle leaving the bottle, the
priforter followed him. The coach was dcfcribe to be a green
bodied one. The prifoser denied having been acrofs the water
during Sunday, and produced three witneffes, who fwore to having
teen hint at Knightfbridge about the time he was faid to have
been at Lambeth ; but rron: the ftrength of the teftimony for the
profecution, he was committed for

•
BOW-STREIT —J. Jcal and W. Butcher were fully committed
for affcmbling with uivers others, armed with fire arms, and
obftrueling tome Revenue Officers in the execution of their duty.
Ann Payne Rated. that the had cohabited with a man named
/In Sift), about two years, who got his hying by fmugglirg, ard
that the ufed to drefs in men's clothes, and go out with him to
affilt in the finuggling of liquor; the rode on horfehaek as a man,
armed with pifirls. Aft w days previous to Chriftntas, the went,in company with John Silky, John Doe, a nun called Old Tom,
and the prifoners, in order to :monk 48 kegs of Holland, in from
Deal. Sbe had three kegs upon her hurfe, and the men had three
each on the bodes they rcde and each of them led a horfe, which
carried fix. The following night, rear Hollilthouene, in Kent,
they were met by two Excite Officer., named Duly and Cocks'
who defireti them to "fall down" tittle goods. Silky aofwered'
they did not mean to lore them, and Bruck Duly's boric a wow'
which knocked it down, and on its recovering, it ran away full
(peed. The officer of enurfe was thrown,and Siticy !truck him while
be vrastlown. Silky and Butcher had pith'''. but they did not tife
them, the others had large (ticks. The witticfa and Old Tom rude
of with the liquor, while the officers were engaged in the affray.
A few days after, Butcher came to Stacy', bottle, and told him, th tt
the officers had cut off John Doe's Itraps and ftirrups, and threw
the kegs over a hedge ; that be went again that night to the (pot,
and recovered molt of them. Butcher received a (evert blow on
his leg ;—Jeal had part of one of his ears cut off ; and Doe had a
piece of o :e of his elbows cut off—Daly and Cocks, rkg ;Arc
confirmed the Ilatement, as to their attack at Y.ol ingbouroe
Mr. GLIAD atteilleti fur the prisoners, and requelted that the
information the had given on a tomer day might he read; "bleb
being done, it appeared that the then (wore that all the haw et the
bufinefs was told bier by Salty.
Mr. Resit alked her which account the meant to abide by
She replied, the account fhe bad then given.
Mr. °LEAD then contended, that as the Witter" was ae 110010.1 s•
eke, ard there was no corroboration of her tettimooy,tto darts
could not Rand.

Mr. Rea°, hovrever, confidend the evidence of the ofieeo►ee a
corroboration of ber teftimany.
The Solicitor of the I:die attended.

L .41V INTELLIGENCE.

COUR!' OF CHANCERY, FEB. 9.
THE BISHOP OF DURHAM'. SIR THOMAS SLACKETT,

BA It T.

This cattle came on to be heard upon bill and
anfwer, and the facts were nearly as follow : In the
year 179 r, fhortly alter the Plaintiff was advanced
to the Bithoprick, a propofal was made to him for
the‘purchafe of one-ninth (hare of a lead mine, called
Werdale Mine, in the count; cf Cumberland, to
which the Plaintiff, as Bilhop of Durham, was en-
titled. This propufal was made by the Ileward of
the Defendant, from whole reprefentations the Billsop
was induced to enter into an agreement with the De-
fendant for the put-chafe of the laid (hare, at the an-
nual rent of 9251. The prefent bill complained, that
the Plaintiff had been led to enter into this agree.
ment entirely through the milreprelentations of the
Defendant's Reward, with tefpea to the value of the
produa of this mine, and that the proportion which
Should have come to his (hare amounted to between
6o and 70,c001. and therefore prayed, that the Paid
agreement fhiuld be let afide, and that an account
of the itrues and profits thould be taken, &c.
The SOLICITOR GENERAL and Mr. MARTIN hated,
that the prayer of the bill was, that by the interpotl-
tion of the authority of the Court the agreement
might be declared nugatory and void ; and that an
account might be tendered by the. Defendant, who
was devilee of Sir Thomas Blackett, of the real
produce of the one ninth (hare to which the Plaintiff
was entitled in Otte mines. They contended that
the agreement was invalid on two grounds : ill. That
there was a fraudulent concealment of the real value
by J. E. Blacken, the agent of Sir Thomas. ediy.
`That it there was no fuch concealment, it was invalid
from the inadequacy of the compenfati-In The
principle of law was perfectly clear, and net a fingle
cafe need be aclduced in tupport of this ptopotition,
that wherethere had been an induarions concealment
greatly to diminifh the value of the thing connatted
tor, the Court had in no inflance given to the party I
praaifing this fraud the benefit of the contract. (Vide
Treatife on Equity, p. 113.) It would be fufficient
to cite a (Ingle precedent on the quellion of inade-
quacy, which would be that of Heathcore and Pan-
nian in Brown, in which cafe Lord Kinyon laid,
that the ground he took war, that the inadequacy
was an evidence of fraud. In the prefent inttance
the ina.lzquacy was fo great, that the 13ifhop, intlead
of having one-ninth of the produce, received fcarcely
one fiftieth proporti'm of it. The mines under Co-
lonel Beaumont have produced in come years 69,0001.
and in others 78,c001. for the lea 4 ore alone indepen-
dent of the frnelting ; and the deficiency in the re-
ceipts of the Bilhop during the time he had held his
prelacy, amounted, in conliquence of this fraudulent
agreement, to 70,cc01.
After the evidence on the part of the Plaintiff had
been reid,
The ATTORNEY GENERAL, in behalf of the Defen
dant, faid, that he hoped the bill would be difmiffed,
or if the Court fhould tr•t proceed thus far, that it
would at lead di: ea an due at la Jo try what was
the jail cumpenfatian the Plaintiff ought to have
received for his interea in this property. The Learn-
ed Counfel entered much at length into the nature of
this property, and remarked, that, in the (cafes of
thefe mines, there was a condi:ion, that fix per Inns
Should he employed in working them ;—fo that, if
no more labourers had been engaged than this cove-
nant requires, the value of the Bifhop's ninth (bare
would not have exceeded tol. per annum. It was
only in confequence of the prodigious capital en-
gaged by the opulent and fpirited adventurer who
had undertaken this concern, that the mines had been
tendered fo extenfively productive ; and the Bilhop,
who had a nett rent payable quarterly by anticipa-
tion, withnot any rifle whatever, had no right to ex-
pect that the terms on which the commutation was
made, Should equal in value the actual produce of his
ninth (hare, exuding out of this immente capital thus
dangerotifly involved.
The Loan CHANCELLOR laid, that the law, as it
refpeaed the inadequacy, depended upon the degree;
and upon the knowledge of one patty, and the igno-
rance of the other. It was not to be expect II that
the claimants in equity would he in a better fituation
than in a Court of Law. Ire was known, that in filch
Courts iffues were joined every day upon fuch
fab-
jects. He took it to be the cleareli cafe in the worl4,
that if he were led to enter into a contract where the
inducement was a nrifreprefentation, merely by mil
take, without any corrupt motives, the contra& wou Id
be void.—Further proceedings in this cafe deferred.

CONSISTORY COURT, DOCTOR COMMONS, FEB. 9.
KIRKMAN V. KIRKMAN.
This was a caufe of dij; ce, or feparation from
bed, board, and mutual abitation, by reafon of
cruelty, promoted by Joie Kirkman, mufical in-
i
fitment maker, tefident in Broad Ilreet, tarnaby-
matket, againfl Mary his wife. The ma..erial fluted
&Hedged in the libel were, that the parties had been
married about fourteen years, and therm were nine
children living by t`aat marriage ; that Mrs. Kirk-
man had repeatedly ill treated berdhufband ; that the.l
at one time itruck him with a pewter quart pot ;
at an Aber time scratched his face wish her finger
mails ; that the had at othkr periods tlirull a lighted
candle in his face; threw a 6:don of boiling milk at
him ; and had frequently done aft% of the like nature.
In corroboration of thefe fa4ls, feveral depofitions of
witneffes were rcai, particularly dime of their chil-
dren, who depofed to repeated quarrels ariting be-
tween their father and mother. The Court after
heating the Counfel on the part .if Mrs. Kirkman,
was dearly of opinion that the wife had bean guilty
of very grofs' raileonduet towards her hufband, and,
therefore, it had no hetitalion in pronouncing, that
the hufband was entitled to the remedy he prayed,,
and accordingly decreed the lame.
• ELLIS V• ELLIS.
'This was alto a caufe of divorce, or reparation
from bed, board, and mutual cohz-bitation, promot.
ted by John Ellis, a hatcher in Leadenhall Market,
againti Maria, his wife, by teafon of adultery. It
appeared in this cafe, that Mrs. Ellis had left her hull
band ever fence the year 1798, and had conflantly
t cohabited with a perfon of the name of Shelly.; that
at feveral lodgings they-palled as man and wife; and
Pal continued lir to pafs ; that Curing fuch period,
Mrs. Ellis had been twice pre„onatd, and the childreir.
as- etc baptifed in the name of Shelley. It alfz ap,

pelted, that an anion of damages had been brought
by the buiband, which was fuffered to go by default,
and the Jury awarded 201. There being no defence
fet up in this cafe, the Gi•urt pronounced the hufband
was entitled to a reparation from bed, beard, and
mutual cohabitation, and accordingly decreed the
fame.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JAN. 29.
MORI V. BERTRAND.

This was an a6tion againft the acceptor of a Bill of
Exchange.
The plaintiff, who is a pet fumer,difeounted the bill,
which was dt awn for 301. and had two months to run,
for a foreigner, named Algerni, who indorfed it.
The defence was, that a ufurious confederation had
been taken by the plaintiff for the difcount. It was
flared, that when Algerni went to the plaintiff with
the bill, he refultd to advance the cafh for it, unlefs
Algerni contented to purchafe a watch of him for 61.
which was acceded to, and the money advanced.-,-
The watch was examined in Court by a watchmaker,
who Elated th:is it was not worth more than one gui-
nea and a half ; and under all the citcumflances of
the cafe, it appeared the plaintiff had not been fatif-
fied with receiving the legal intereft at 51. per cent.
but had extorted 41. on -the tale of the watch. The
Jury, without hefitation, found a verdid for the
defendant.

JAN. 3 t.--artata son V. KIDD.
This was an aCtion brought by a feaman again!' the
Fir( Mate of the City of London Eat' Indiaman, for
repeated aff4ults and ill treatment. The firs alledged
Affairlt took place at Spithead, when the defendant
caufed the plaintiff to be dragged nut of his hammock,
where he was confined through illnefs, ftretehed upon
the grating, where his body was tmeared with filth,
and then tarred and feathered, a fool's cap placed on
his head, and a collar round his neck. In that fitua•
tion the defendant called the boys to laugh, and ridi•
cule him, exclaiming, " ll—n him, I'll cure him
fooner than the Dator !" When at Bombay he was
ferved in the fame way, and afterwards flogged with
a two-inch rope. He was afterwards fent on board
the Fox frigate, with a view to affift in the attack of
fume pirates who infefled the Malabar coaft, and be-
caufe he refufed to leave the (hip in which he was
chartered for the voyage, he was tied hand and foot,
and in that way fent on board. The anfwer to all
this ill treatment was, that the plaintiff was a lazy,
idle fellow, and what is termed a fkulker, It was
therefore contended, that the punifhment he received
tvasneceffary to enforce the labour he had contrafted
to perform, and p:eferve the difcipline of the (kip.
The Jury found for the plaintiff—damages 751.
F5B. 3.-CHANCELLOR 41. Lsostrs.
This was an a!tion brought by the Clerk of the
Commitlloners of Margate Pier, to recover a portion
of the falvage of a (hip preferved from (handing.—
The caufe was tried before the Chief Baron, and
the quellion was, whether thirty-four or twenty per-
lons ought to (hare, as it appeared the whole had en-
deav :ured to aflill the (handed veffel ? The Jury were
of opinion that the greater number were entitled to I
(hare, and accordingly found a verdiCt for the Plain-
tiff Application was made in this Court to fet afide
the verdid, and enter a nonfuit, on the ground that
the aCtion ought to have been brought in the name of
a perfon to whom the Commiffiimers had let the Pier
of Margate, with its dues, at the time the (hip was
in danger of (handing. An ACI of Parliament paffed
in the twenty feventh cf prefent Maielly, enacts,
that the people of Margate thall recover by aClion
brought in the name of the Clerk to the Commif-
fioners of the Pier, half a (hare of all goods and vef-
leis which they preferve, and that they (hall alto have
double coils of dolt. Upon this At!, Mr. Serjeant
BEST contended, that the aCtion could not be brought
in any name but that of the Clerk to the Commit.-
froners ; and if the Court let afide the verdin, the A't
I alluded .to was nugatory.—lt did not appear that
there was any claute in the Act which Paid the leafe-
holder fhauld not bring the aCtion, and the Court
were of opinion the verdiCt could not be futtained, as
the Commitlioners had difpoled of their claim to the
dues of the Pier, for a certain time, by granting a
leafe, and confequently the aCtion fhould have been
brought in the name of the perfon in polfeffian. The
rule for entering a Jinni-nit was made ablolute.

FEBRUARY 4•—•-WALLER V. EVAN! AND ALLICE.
Mr. Serjeant SHEPHERD moved for a new trial in
this caufe, the circumflances of which were as follow:
The Plaintiff was Captain of a merchantman, and
the Defendants (hip bt nker s. Captain Waller brought
an action againfl the Detendants for value had and
received for ft eight, to which account they Rated ano-
ther by way of let off, by which it appeared that the
balance was in their favour. Captain Waller, how.
ever, faltifild this account, and proved that the De-
fendants had therein charged fums not paid by them.
The Defendants then pleaded that they had charged
furls to Captain Wailer, which ought to have been
charged to the owners of the (hip. To this it. was
aufweted, that no deed of theirs could do away the
Plaintiff's right of pr ofectuing for the (urns abfolutely
due to himfelf as Captain of the veffel, and part-
owner of the cargo.
Mr. Serjeant BAILEY. on the pan of the Defen-
dants, contended, that Captain Waller was not Rua-
lined to bring an aaion at all, eizher as Captain or
Owner ; that the account was given in to him as
reprefenting the Owners, and sifting as their agent.
The Court being of the fame opinion, the Rule was
made abfolute.
DOE, ON THE DEMISE OF ALITANDER V. WATSON.
Mr. Serjeant BEST, on the part of the Defendant,
Rated, that this was an ejedtment fervid on the De-
fendant by the reprcfentatives of Alexander, whofe
own right had tested, as he was only afervant at
will, 2nd had himielf Lad notice to quit from Lucas,
who was the principal tenant under Rickets, and
who let the premites in quellion to Aletancler.. The
only ptinciplo of law involved. 4:atlas qpeflion was
this : it was alledged on the part of the Plaintiff,.
that Rickets, theTroprietor of..the lamts,,,wh'o had
given the notice to tank, was only proprietor of one-
; fourth, and therefore could not 'spiny slit of his put
!an end to the tertamrpt Alexander. 'Vet 'this, it was
replied, that Alexaaer, by paying rept!! having once
acknoFledgcd.t.heaight Ittcicets tlfli4f4)., tG wali
tow incumbent on:Jailn to difprove that circumflanee,
The CoutlitseAogAclic latter opip,ion,* Rule .was
difaharged witb•cotts,
. r crtasp.szt D. 213?18TAL1L.,,,'
Ur: Setjtarn Betur moved to let. Ode a 'era
U
gl4;en.in alormet trial for the Dchindint. It, vtlas
. .

Prated that Tunfiall had pvrchared a weighing ma.
chine on a bridge at Rocheffer of Chatitler, for which
he had paid thirty pounds, in a promiffory note ; but
the bridge being immediately after pulled down,
payment of this note was refilled, on the grounds
that Chancier knew at the time of the fale that the
bridge was thortly to be removed. This allegation
had been proved by the evidence of one Harding and
his wife, whom Chantler had begged not to men-
tion to Tunflall that the L•ridge was coming down.
Mr. Serjeant LENS endeavoured to thew, that
Chancier could not pottibly know any thing about
the pulling down of the bridge ; hut the Court being
, of opinion that his requeft to the Holdings was a
proof of fome fraudulent defign, the former verdia
was confirmed.

LO-VDO.N MARKETS. •

RETURN of WHEAT In Mark-lane, isielndin7 only from the
26th of January to the 3 itt of Jan.—Total 7,512 quarter.
Average 765. 61.i.-2s. old lower than lalt return.
A RETURN OF FLOUR,
From the 24th of January to the 3oth of January.
Total-9 628 facks--.,verage Its. 40.
IS. Ad. lower than latt return.
RETURN PRIM , • :RAIN ON BOARD SHIP AS UNDER:
Wheat 50. 602 68s Boilers Bos hBs od
Fine 705 76s Suflulks to 935 od
Superfine 788 825 Grey Peas 361 453 Cd
Fine Mx White, Sec. —s 84. Fine New to —1
Rye, new 365 441 Beans,
Harley 3os 40 od Tick Beans•
Malt 58s 705 Oats
White Peas job 7os Poland.
PRICE OF HOPS.

36$ 47$
3os 4cs cd
21$ 2f.s 28s
3.-A 32s od

PAM.. POCIETS.
Kent 41 151 to It; I KCAL 51 Os to 61 118
likl 41 121 to 51 113 SUIICX - 51 OS to 51 156
Effea 41 12$ to 51 113 Farnham 61 os to tot os
PRICE OF HOPS IN THE BOROUGH MARKET.
Ncw Bags 41 15$ to 51 15s I Pockets 51 cs to 61 tos
61 123.
PRICES OF HAY AND STRAW.
St. James's. Whitechapel.
Hayperload 3 ooto 5 0o I Hay per load 3 10 to 4 a
Straw 2 14 oto 3 6 o Straw 2 10 to 3 0
Clover 4 to to 5 10
PRICE OF UAT AND STRAW IN slim AFIELD.
Hay, - 31 ics to 41 155 I Clover 41 cs to 51 51
Rowcn of os to 01 Cs Straw, ii 163 tJ 2.1 56

SMITHFIELD MARKET, February• 9.
To fink the offal..--per Roue of Elb.
Beef 4s 44 to 51 4d I Veal 5s od to 6; 6d
Mutton 44 8d to ss Ed Pork s. cd to is ed

RICA° OF CATY LE THIS DAY.
Beall., about .17oo—Sheep and Lambs,
NEWGATE and LEADENHALL, February 9.
Per (tone of 81b. by the careafe.
Beef 3s od to 4s 4d I Veal 4s od to 6s od
Mutton 3s 8d to 4s 81 Pork ss od to 6, od