Star.
London, England, 1824-05-18 00:00:00

it;ezi/iL

30, STILAN D, London;
And ;old in every Town in the Kingdora.
LIQUID, in Bottles, 6d. MI. 12d. and lad. each.
A'so l'AsTli BLACKING, in Pots, 6d. 12d. and lad. each.
A Shilling Pot of rate is equal to Four la. Bottles of Liquid.
5..7- Ask for WAILREN'I Blacking.

A Capital Mansion-House, most delightfully situate on a, fine corn.
manding eminence, embracing luxuriant .and extensive Views, in
excellent condition, hamlsolitely 11:te.1 up, and adapted for the Ac-
commodation of a Fain ity of the Ix st ltespretabilii y ; with an Entrlnce
Lodge, extensive Shrublierv, fine l'irce Water, and Clrriage.
;drive in iron] ; Stable, Gardener's Cottage, and Out•
buildings; Pleasure Grounds, laid out with Gravel Walks, iichly
ornanunti_d with thriving Shrubs, Pvergreens, Flowers, &c. a
capital rro,!uctlve Kiteurn tianden, well stocked, cropped, and
planted; Paddock, &c. containing nearly
SEVEN ACRES.

All in the finest order, no rains or expense having been ap•:red to
rendt r it a most desr.thk. Itetre:.r.

To be viewed I.y Tickets, which, with Particulars, may be had
on the Menthes ; at the Inn, ; Bell, Hendon ; Green
Man, Upper Hale • Cranes, and White Hart, Edgware ; Red Lion,
and Greta Man, Barnet; Essex Arms, Watford ; of 3ftssrs. Tom-
linson, Thomson, Raker, and Smith, Solicitors, King's Arais-yard,
Coleman-street; at (iarraway's; and of Mr. Robins, 170, 'Regent-
street.

PARMA 'VENT ARY PROCEEDING&

HOUSE OF LORDS, MAY 17.

This morning their Lordships sat at ten o'clock, when the House
proceeded to Committee of Privilege on the Roscommon cause.
Mr. LeNeu proceeded with the case of his client, Michael Dil-
lon ; he produced copies of several ducuniznts to prove the deaths
of that Gentleman's immediate ancestots. Mr. Alsop, Solicitor in
the cause, proved tile copies.
Mr. liirFoßn then cress-cx..ntir,:d Mr. Alsop at great length with
respect to the au, henticit y of ti,' r.cd on l'hurelay, and
at the close of the cross.exantiltation proposed to offer an objection
in law against the great body of this documentary evidence. The
House, however, determined to prec,,d with the examination of
Mr. Michael Ditlon's witnesces reserving the question of evideßee
for future argument. St.veral oth,r witnesses were then ex :mined
by Mr. LYNCH, and slightly cress-examined by the Arrostmor-Gz.
NERAL and Mr. GIFFORD.

At kngtll Mr. LVNCIi having declared that he had no more

Mr. Gieronn repeated his proposition to shew that the great
body of documents did not amount to legal evict nee.
Mr. LyNem objected to Mr. Giremoi's being heard until he
should have put ill a specific claim on the part of his client.
The A irmesrv-Grareat. al-o objected to his Learned Frend'e
proceeding to argument, until he should have put in Lis client's
cas, and pedigree.
The LORD CHANCELLOR sail that Mr. Gifford had hitherto
beeo parmitted to act as assistant to the Attorney-General ; but that
his client must appear as a party before he could act es a principal:
• Lord R E DES DA LE suggested that the Gentleman might give to
the Ilouse a sketch of the case which he hoped to he alder) make out.
Mr. Gimlet) would cheerfully do so. The evidence upon which
he relied consisted of public records and parole testimony. Amoog
the first were the p'tents of creation of the Barons Prerch and of
Sir Gonville Boorinhead, in both of which the descent of his client's
grandfather from the first Earl of floscontmon were recited. The
other documentary proofs he said would be found in the records of
the Courts of Wards and Claims, and in the Courts in Ireland.
The parole evidence was composed of the depositions of aged per-
sons, nineteen in number, as to the reputation of Francis Dillon's
descent front James first Earl of Roscommon—(Mr. Gafford read
one of these deposifions made by a Gentleman ninety-five years old,
which was specific to the point); and the declarations of deceased
hie:oilers of the Roscommon family ; the late Lord French ; the
late Earl of Roscommon ; the late Lord Sonderlio; Lady Mary
Dillon, and several other persons of inferior rank, all to the same
effect. This body of evidence he said amounted to a moral demon-
stration of the descent of Francis S. Di:lon from the first Earl of
Roscommon, though some difficulty still existed as to bringing for-
ward the exact line of descent ; which line, however, whatever it
might turn out, must take precedence of the line of the counter-
claimant Michael, who comes from the youngest eon : he concluded
by stating that Mr. Allan, the agegt in the cause, was preparing to-
send persons to Ireland to make the necessary search.—The case
was then adjourned to Thursday.
" Hall v. the Attorney-General" was then proceeded with, when
Mr. FL/MILAN/Ur and Mr. SHAUWFLL (iii part) were heard for the
appellant, and the further hearing was ordered for Tioirolay next.
At about a quarter to lour o'clock the LOKI/ CHANCLLLOgi the
Earl of SIIAFMBBURY, and Lord It kJ/I.:SI/ALE, sat as Lords Commis-
sioners for giving the Royal Assent to certain Bills, agreed upon by
both I louses of Parihment, and the Yawn ;n U her of the Black
God was directed to requite the attendance of the other House. •
Shortly alter Mr. Sea AKER and several 'Members of the Com-
mons approached their Lordships' La-, upon which the Foyal Com-
iniabion was read, and his Alajesty's Assent teas notified end de-
clared with the usual form to the Edls following:—The Rnm Du-
ties Repeal Bill, the Sugar lit:unties Imi.ortatiou 1141, the Exche-
quer fails. (Public Works) Bill, the Militia Pay Bill, the Glass Du-
ties Bill, the Aliens' Act Continuation Lill, the Imikeepera' Allow-
ances Bill, the Marriage Act Amendment Bill, the British Museum
Bill, the Irish County Treasurer,' Bill, the Irish Records Stealing
Bill, the Irish Proctors' Costs Bill, the Irish Constables' Bill, the
Highland Roads and Bridges Bill, use Hertford and Lee Union
Canal Bill, the Stockton Railway Bill, the kirachOurne Church Bill,
Ateclosfield School Bill, and several Road amid some Inclosure Bills.
The Earl of LAUDERDALE presented Petitions against the
General United Gas Light Company Bill, from the Northampton
Gas Light Company ; also from the Glasgow Gas light Company;
also front the Leeds Gas Light Company, amid the Inhabitants of
the Town of Leeds, who Frayed to be heard by Counsel against
the Bill.

Tne 17.31-1 of ROSSLYN presented similar Petitions from tla
Town of Liverpool and the County
I.;rd CA \V DOR postp..ketl his 51.41. in rs!sp....cting the Adminis-
tration of Justice in 'lVaiea to Monday