Star.
London, England, 1812-06-30 00:00:00

'severally ordered. • Ris i.erdship likewise
that the members be chosen by ballot.
Mr. W H ITBRE D protested against ttiit
of proceeding, since it would give the Nome
the appointment cf every Member of the Cogt •
He wished that the Members of it should bo p.
named and chosen, th .t the House, and on: the
Me Lord, might have the formation ,J the
mittee.—( Hear.)
Lord CASTLEREAGH persisted in his
since he was certain that on no side of the Hoye
such a quest:on would party feelings bt
was convinced that is would be treated by Pa 444
in a manner, which, while it did it hunbutt
give satisfaction to the people.
Sir FRANCIS BURDETT, looking at diet
cedents to which Mr. Whitbread had ieflited,e;
not help feeling great jealousy as to the conduct
Government ; he hoped that tht bounds of tbecs
stitution would not anew be transgressed h7d4
The mode in'which the Committee WAS Nast,'
the satisfaction of the people were looked to, 14
the utmost importance—(Hear, hear.) It ob?
' be of such a description that the country would
!reliance upon its wisdom and impartiaiig, aW
to be merely composed of the creotures of m"
nomination.
fThe question that the Committee be chosen!"
lot was then put and carried, though there wens*"
number of dissentient voices.

On the question that Members prepare ligs,
appear to-morrow to put thtm into classes spy
for their reception, •
Mr. WHITBREAD declared that Ife they'd,
attend for that purpose, as experience had skied
it would be useless, since any list he might pep
would be smothered in the vast heap of nano s
plied by the Noble ',ford and his political fries&
It was ordered that the Papers communicated'
the Prince Regent should remain sealed until ttee
pointment of the Committee.
ECCLESIASTICAL COURTS.
Sir W. SCOTT rose tor the purpose of mesa
(Jr leave to bring in a Bill to regulate Etclesiasa
Courts. lie commenced by a learned esaniaes
Of the original institution of tare Ecclesiastic.lced
hut although detached sentences were caught,'
general tlittad of the intriative was SilrgelMh
in the gallery. He quott d the of liven Lf Lad llas
to shew that some alteratiOr.s Ire le .:9101 tin (La
necessary, and refereed to the atumpismadebyLa
the First, Anne, .ind in wi how sucaso
tffect this object. He then went on to sun sic
his Bill be had accomplished, aid what le hank
unperformed.. In the first place lie had ?tea
that the process of exci sumutuntion :hale fret
continued, .nu in its plate he had sunsitted d
pmcesu de matortacicatiesido. He had restsll4l
excemniunicauua gent ally, excepting in casts
great enormity. He hod not thin& u'fit to date
it altogether, since as•-very other establishment?
sensed. the pot' el, he did not think that the Cleat
of England sht thd be placed in 'an inienorsitune
I'he next piosis; n u a., that the civil ci memo
attendant upon exec mmunicntion !Wild be ntix*s
excepting in cases of ;them and some othou-lt
object he had next cohttmplated,was the alo.it
a number 01 ininor Ecetestastical Count, .0
that improvement in justspludtixe
muted by extension of jusisdicrion. A twelve;
clauses had been inserter' for the putpcsevfiene
ng the proceedings of the interior tribunals we
Diocesan Courts. The qualification of id
bad tl en occupied his attentii n, and the to
of the Bill was occupied in making provitas
to Church Rates and Tythes. He had miner
this measure two matters that some
might have wished inserted : it was silentee
tett of defamation, because, if the jurisdiction d
Ecclesiastical Courts were taken away Mount
of :Linda on the Lliwch, they would nit bengd
sable in our Cotirts of law. AU provisioesitgA
ing. Ireland were also omitted, Sir W. Sao pi
(elm:lg Itimse:f not sufficiently acquainted iiiil
constitution of the Cons.storial Courts there. Usi
many circumstances of disadvant..ge, he bad a
charged the task imposed trOon him by 'teflon..
with great diffidence, well aware of the magliDd
and import ante of the subject : if the House id
adopt his Bill, he should feel much pleasure ;
it disapprov, d of it, he would take leave of it wide'
regret. He mated for leave to bring in a Bill WI
better regulation of Ecclesiastical Courts jolt's/a
of the United Kingdom called Eilland, and fit)
more easy collection of church rates and tythes"
Lord FOLKESTONE expressed his utilgli
at seeing the promise of the Right Honouralik I
Learned Gentleman fulfilled : the measure
closed met his entire approbation ; he lamented'
that it had been introduced at so late a period'
Session, and that it was brought. f rward
ill ailsi.ices, when the Right Honourable and Le
Gentleman &dared that if it were throw
should take leave of it without regret.
Sir W. SCOTT explained, and adverted s
the difficulties w.ils which he had had to coal
st parating the Ecclesiastical Law, when it ware
jerwoven and united with the very substangtir
Constitution. He denied that he was incliPlot
to the fate if the Bill. •
Sir SAMUEL ItOMILLY, after sumiobill
tioiis on the injurious tendency of the juristrea.
question, said he understood it was not t. e
ilustr
aid
of the Right Honourable Gentleman to M .
' provisions ef his Bill t,t Ireland. He suPP"III,./1
this arose from the, difference in the Contligirs
the Spiritual Courts in that part of the Fter
he c, uld not help wishing that a measure
wised to be so generally advautleeo,
ceinn:unicatect to that country.
Mr. TIGHE strongly recommended the
extended to Ireland, where, if the Sp'
weredifferent; the diffen nee was for tire
Sir W. SCOTT said a fiw words in e
when it was ordered, that he and the At
ral'should prepare and bring in the Bill.
SIR. PALMIER'S BILL.
Mr. PALMER. moved the third tettertig
Per Ctplatge Bill.
Sir ANCIS BURDETT rose to of
words respecting some misconception whkh
relative to the opinions which- had bees
the leality of Mr. Ptilmer's claim, by
Mansfield, Lord Erskine; Sir Vicary Gass(
Adam. It had been said that the GOA.
eminent lawyers had been famed as es