Star.
London, England, 1813-03-11 00:00:00

. TO THE EDITOR OF THE STAR. '

Correspondent, 44 JUSTITIA," In your
Paper of the 22d ult. has pertinently, and pointedly
enough, questioned those whom it behoves, and will
well become to answer, whether the extraordinary and
'incredible fact be so as rumoyrei, that a certain Illus.
lriosts Mother and Daughter (endeared and rivetted to
etch other by their mutual suit:ling of heart--en-
deared to the Nation by their reciprocal attacfttnent)
have been, and are aia debarred from any commu-
nication whatever with each other ? He puts the
question in the name of England, and rightly so, FOR
tngland sympathise: in the wounded sensibilities of the
Illustrious Parties, and sanctions the enquiry. But,
Sir, in that same name is further asked, Whether, and
for how much longer, the Chair of State, the homage of
Right, belonging and due to the Panicess or WALES,
helm, as she is, as integral part of the Third Estate of
the Realm, are to.he withheld from her Royal High-
ness ?
These, Sir, are queries upon points, be the one.
morally, be the other politically contemplated, of
serious and extremest import to the country at, large....
Not oily are the Rqul Parent and her Child concern.
ed, and deeply too in the first, pierced to the inmost
heart—their choicest happiness wantonly and vitally
destroyed by this unfeeling and bisito/itie prohibition e.
Not alone remonstrate—not they alone plead, or
should pleaded for.tht father:, the mother:, and
daughter: of Britoil universally, appear co-plaintiffs in
this interesting and /pain: cause, The maternal and
filial afftctions 44 which preaching to doses might
make them capable" stand forth their eloquently
persuasive advocates.
Yet, Sir, we will hope still, that by those set in
authority over us—by those whom the Qonstitution
holds responsible fbr the acts and deeds of the Sove-
reign rower, England will be listened to, respected
and satisfactorily answered.
The period for the circulation of virulent prep-
dices, of foul aspersions, of dastardly insinuations,
of .42aMeless defamation—As past. .England expects
that the proud, sananimoos, and honourable verdict
of a British House 'of Commons, in favour of in.
used innocence, will be followed by a corresponding
line of conduct to the High Character that has been
so groisly and foully calumniated, A declaration of
Innocence is not enough. Why are the calumniators
left unpunishid ? With whom should thi% originate?
With those whose charicters have been exposed to
the possitStlity of censure from the colouring that yeas
given to every part of their proceedings.—perhaps
by the friends of •the origioal slanderers, previous to
their open and individual expression of personal con-
viction of :,be ionOcence of the accused, in the ever.
tumoral* discussion on Friday night in the House
of Commons.
The altunnies that were circulated should be held.
in the light of a disloyal insult, and resented as a hei.
nous and pnpordonable offence against the State—as
calculated to sow discord and dissention in a family
to which the NatiOn at large should look for an ex-
ample. And shall the Illuttrim Injured be deserted
10 a soil foreign to her birth, and in a country too
which boasts, and justly boasts of its virtues, its
-loyalty, and its love of justice ? It cannot be that
a character that has been so much injured will be
left only to the consolation, great as that must be, of
enjoying the pity, the esteem, and affection of a loyal
People.. INTERROGATOR.
• The general impression with the public is, that in the
clef-
dse of that power which the laws of the country give to every
father respecting the education of his own ch.ld, his Royal
peas the Palmer Raottir has only abridged the frequency of
intercourse between the Princess CH4RLOTT2 ant her Mollie.-
from !Asides ante a wee been nce a fortnight. Tbe fact is, •;i
the Royai Mother lasstrahoila from visiting Wam
House
it

We now hear that Ministers have actually under.
taken a Third Investigation, and that new examina.
tions aregoing on with a view to new proceedings on
the case.
It is reported that sir JOHN DOUGLAS has been sb
ill-advised as to call on Lord CAsmanzacti, and
other Members of the House of Commons, tor an
explanation of the harsh terms in which. they men-
tioned his and Lady DOUGLAS'S declaration in No-
vember, 1805. Those Members know their duty
better than to satisfy any such call. Mr. W
ets-
ERMA one of the Members thus called on, is stated
to have given for answer, that what he had said in
the House, he would defend in the House; and here
the matter rests for thqtesera.