Star.
London, England, 1805-07-04 00:00:00

EL EPFN7 RAP:AT.

][TORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE UPON THR ELE•
VENTL at PORT CF THE COMMISSION OF N•F•L EN•
Iky lit v.—( Concluder! from yylerday'i ,Sr4R.)

Ftteller Fzaminalion ff Ewaw Law, Efq.
If Mr. Goldfield bad Rated to you., that the nicotine in golf-
tints, vial in hix opinion indifpenfably neeelTarl, or materially ufe-
ful fee the (ippon of public credit, and had offered to your corfi
deratioo fuels and reafonings in fepport 421 fuch an opinion, fhould
you have thought it proper or not to have entered into that en-
quiry ?—Had it occurred to me to take into confideration what
thould have done. had fuch reprefent:tione been wade by Mr.
Goldfmid, I Mould have. probably, been tow able to anfwer the
queftion, but that not having been the ca!e, it is morally impolli-
hie for me to do fo, as I curvet fay what I thould k..ve done at
t'ie time under fuch circumitane s; 1 have, however, no hefita-
Von to Rate tbat which !now think upon the fubjea, namely, that
what Mr. Gorfned roir,ht have raid or 'be occcfrity or expedien-
cy of the mearucr. woub! nit have induced nit to prepore the en-
tering into the enquiry; I beg leave to add, that as I before Rated,
Clot I .!id not ricolleet any Inch communication as that allioied to
• avir g teen made by Mi. Gobillnid; 1 urn now conEttimd it my
opinion that he has been n.i.taken in Rating that Ira had made
fuch a commuilleati4vr.
You having Rated that Mr. Goldfmld went into very long di-
grcffione, are yon confident in jour belief and recolledien, that
no part of thole dire Mons related to the meal-Iry or expediency
of the meartire ?—1 do not recoiled, nor do I bet eve that they did.
You having Rated you heli.vt 41 that not tare hurtiredth port of
what Mr. Gollfto id R. te d before the Commiffioners of Naval En-
quit) , is tee rdcd in their Report, do you mean that no part of
the remaining ninety nine parts had reference t• the occer.ity or
expediency of the mcafure ?-1 do mean that 1 believe fo.
Were the queßions put to Mr. Goldfroid on the 25th of June,
and recorded in the Report. prepared beforehand, er were thi
framed not or the matter that arofe In the comic 4,1 hls examina-
tion ?—1 firmly believe that they were prepared before hand.
Did you conceive, then, that noshing was material to your en-
quiry. fo far as Mr.Goldfmid was concerned, except the matters
to which thole queftions In previoufly prepared were 'Heeded ?
Ido conceive that to have been th, cure; had any wher queftions
occurred to me at the time, I &mild have propufed them to have
b:11: taT:CV down.
On what foundation or evidence did the Naval Conuniflioners
Rate. that they cot Id not admit the mcafore to have been indif-
penfably neteiTary fee the fepport of public credit (ea.- t ith Re-
port, p. 4ll(.)?—They proceeded on the idea, that the irregular
method adopted for the railing money could net be indifpenfably
tweeflaty,when Parliament could have effeaed the fupply by other
means. 1 mid own it did not appear to me neettfary to call
evidence to that point.
Was it not the intention or the Commiftioners of Naval En-
quiry, to Rate any circumftauces that 'might tend to jultify or
extenuate the Adt which they thou3ht illegal?--The Cemmiflion-
so< direded their enquiry principally to what regarded the eunduel ,
of the Naval Department placed under their infpcition, in the
Mlle of the bills in queftion. The Rate of the hxchequer, and
ether !ratters politically relating to the ['Aka, belong to the De
partreent of the Treafury ; they therefore did not carry the en-
Reny fo far as to enable then, to ftate what cireumftanzes might
Le hr night in juilifleation or exteruation of the mcafure.
Did the Comut:flioners think themfelves at libetty to enquire
',to any thing that the Trerrury might have to aUedge in their
juftification ?—They did not.
Were there upon Mr. Goldfmld's examination, before any
written queftions were put down, feveral converfations by him
with the Commiffioners, to make them unit:lit-cod the ufc of the
nuefure, concluded by way of queftion and anfwer, as here—
Certainly not.
If there had been any fuel converfatiow fo eondudled, do you
think you mutt have recullethod it ?—i think 1 muft.
Had Mr. Goldfini4l any reafon given to him by the Domenic-
Cotters to copert that any other evidence or examination would
be Inferted by them in this Report, except fetch as he figned in
their prefenee N-4l believe there was tint, and I think it impofible
It fhould be fo.
- -

Farther Examination of EtaAar LAW, Ffq.
When you (peak of queftions having been previonfly prepared, '
do you mean; prepared before Mr. Goldfmid came before you ?
se--Yes, I do.
You have hated a firm belief, that all the queftions put to Mr.
Goldfmid on the 25th of June, as they appear in the Appendix to
the Eleventh Report, were fo prepared beforehand; do you cone
tinge in that belief ?—1 fee no rrafon to think otherwife.
Is it not pollible that other queftions may have teen put, and
anfwers received to them, which do not appear in Mr. GoldfmitPs
examination fu the Eleventh Report ?•—1 cannot fpeak to preflibi- '
aisles ; but no queftion not put in writing is conf.dered as fueh by
the Commilhoners.
Explain what you matt by the word "fuck" in your lath an •
fwer mean that no queftions not taken down, and the anfwers
thereto ertered in the examination!, are cot littered as forming
a part of the e %lettuce epon which the Reports are grounded; I
meant to cede& 'shames tnay pals in the way of explanation or
eonverfatien.
When Mr. Coltifmid was before the Commiffioners of Naval
Enquiry on the 25th of Jure, was there any examination of hint
by the Conerniffinners, whether verbally or in writin3, concluded :
by way of queftion and an(wcr, as here. except what appears in '
the Appendix to the Eleventh Report P—There was not.
Did the Commiffioners make any enquiry into the circa:often-
ees of the times when the iffue of the Navy &Hs took place, in
order to akertain whether any application to Parliament was then
predicable?—They made leo cequiry 'iuto the cireusaftances of
the times.
he Examination of litivor NICHOLS, FA. jone 7.
It appearirg that you were prefent at the examination of Mr.
Goldfmid before the Conlminioners of Naval Enquiry, on the 25th I
of June 1204, were the quell ietee which were propofed to him, and
which appear in No. ix, in the Appendix to the Eleventh Report,
prepared and written before Mr.Goldfmid came to the Board
I firmly believe they were, and, to the hell of my knowledge and
Belief, they were written by :midi'.
Were the anfwers which he gyve to thofe queftions taken down
in writing, and afterwards read over to Lim?—They were, but it
was with confiderable difficulty the Board could obtain dired an-
fwers front Mr. Goldfatid.
Had be fun opportunity to corral any er-or in the anfwers fo
tel. eo down, and stasis eapbined to him that he might do fo if he
pleura ?.....Me.ft affimelly he had ; the general prediee of the Board
is, after the cold: nee has been taken down. to tell the perfon ex-
amined that the queftions and anfwers are about to be read over,
to give him an opportunity of altering or amending any anfwers
which he may have given to the queftions put to him • and I do
not believe there has been any Inn:emelt which the Board has de-
parted from fuch predict', or any infielce in which they have re-
fa, d to take down sty evidence offered by the party examined,
however irrelevant it may have hem to the fulled of the enquiry.
After the n.qh cv: y of the evidence has beet forced to the party,
s fair crpy of the e: ice nee is miser. and pee vious to its I dog read
to the perfon examieed,it has brat the general pradice of the Beard
end in no inflame has it, to my isuosel, dee, been departed from,
to tell the perfon examined thee lee is at liberty to amend, alter, or
twain his evidence byway of ateendmeut lam Wished this was
done with refpodt to Mr. Goldfoliel's evidence.
Did the Commiffieners of Naval Foquiry dire& the fair copy
to be made different In any refpedi from the rough copy, exccpt
in fuck perticulare as Mr. Goldinsid defired or approved of, or
was ft in fad. fu made?—They did not; I rail Coo to winters, and
declare in the mai foknue manner in which man Is capable of
'peaking, that the Comte Menem of Naval Freptiry have not, to
any knowledge, within ld or kept back any part of the evidence
• given before them, or any document, paper,or v.ritin3, that would
have tended to the crimi.lation or exculpation of any individual,
wile& condudl they were auths•rifed to en,,uii e into; and that they
have not negletiled, m far as I ant capable of judging, to purfue
any mturfc of examination, or means of obtaining knowledge, tkat
wank'. have tended to crimine te or eacti:pwe tech it:dividends.
Did you, in point of fad, on a fulled. of itch ferious crimina-
tins of Gum invent as that contained In page 46 of your Eleventh
Report, where you fay, " it was certainly proper that the public
credit ihotdd be fupported, but we cannot admit that this coca•.
fore wag indifrenhasly neceffory for that purpae,", enter into any
courfe of examination touching that necefilty I—The mtafure al-
luded to was thoiffue of 4.30e,0"01. of fidtitious Navy bills, for the
pu-pofe 0 raifieg money; the mortar did not appearto the COMa
steamers of Navel Prqui-y to to
indifpenfably tweeffary, tut Par.
'lament was fitting during the time se hen-molt or thefe Bills were
fo ailed; and I did not, as or.e of the CurnmifFoners of NavakEn-
a uky, feel 'thee that L'nard v. ae :onepetet t to go into a coterie of
s'ausnimtion touching that samellity, moths' fewit, go into
Oct clasnisatior

Did the Board toter into any emir, sato the fltdelg of Pella.
meet, as conneeled w ith the refpeetive commencements and con-
tinuance of the iffue of the hills above referred tot—The Board I
did not enter into any retch enquiry; it will be fern, on roferetice to
the dates of the revere' bills, that the greater part of them were
demi dining the time that Parliament is ufually
Arc you not aware that it appears from the Account. No. 4, in
the Appendix, that thefe hills crated tote Med for a time on the
7th 01 March, tBot, and commei red again on the yth of Septem-
ber of that year?—lt appears fo on reference to the Report, and it
alfo appears they were continued to tee iffucd mail May slot,
without any material lapfe (Odom
Were the anfwers which appear in the printed examination of
Mr. Goldin:Ll, given by him to each queftion diftindly upon its
being read to him, or were they the (angrier of tie converfations
with theCommiffioners, put in writing by the Clerk after the C, OS.
nlifrioners had confulted anionglt themfelves and determined how
ring% it was requifite to have written down ? the Comntiffioners
never coafulted how much of Mr. Goldfnud'e evidence it was ne•
ceffary to take down; there was confect:Table difficelty in obtain-
irg dired ar 'veers ft one Mr. Gent:di ; as far ai I am caplet of
recolledieg, the. auto ers to each queltior were didtated by Mr.
Goland ; and moth enmity they were loch at Mr. Goldfmid
approved of. se I believe Mr. G +timid did al oa (note of Lis an.
(were upon .;ie evideoto being read over to him.
When Mr. Goldfmid appeared before the CommiMoners on the
Istii of June, 1804, was there any exemitiatiot. of Mr. Goldfmid
by die CummiMoners, either verbally or in writing, condudled by
way ne queltieei and antwer. as here, except what .appears in the
Appendix, sto the Teeth and Eleventh Reports?-1 ant fatiefied
there was not; the whole of the fuliftance of the evidence given
by Mr. Goldfmid was taken down, andappears in the Appendix
to thole Reports. hut there was a great deal of ir deviant mom.-
ration between Mr. Goldrmiel and fume of the Members of the
Board, whiell was not taken down.
Did Mr. Gehlftrid, when he was before the Commiffloners on
the 25th of June, 1804, or 9th July. Rate any thin; to them on
the fulled of the neeeffity or utility of the iffue of the Lille in
queftioo, and if he did, at what time and in what manner f—l do
not believe that Mr. Goldfmid did have any thing to the Board
on either of thole days as to the neeellity or utility of the mem
fore ; and if he Mid Rated any thing as to the utility of the mea-
fure, I am fati,led it would have been Rrongly impreffed upon my
mind.
Did you examine any evidence touching the neceffity or utili-
ty of the meafure ?—None ; but Come queftions which may ap.
pear to have relation thereto, which were put to the Comp-
troller of the Navy, and appear in.the Appendix to the Eleventh
Report.
Did you examine M. GoldfirM 12 to the neeeffity dr utility of
the meafure f elTuredly rot.
Did you conceive Mr. Goldfmid to be a perfon competent to
(peak of the comparative advantage or difadvantage of different
modes of railing money 1-1 never confidered whether Mr. Gold-
fmid was or was not competent; if I bad formed a judgment from
his manner, I Mould not have thought him competent.
Lid you confider the Comptroller of the Navy as the more coin-
petent perfon whom you could call beton you, to enable you to
form a Judgment as to the comparative advantage or difadvantage
of different modes of railing money? No.
Did Mr. Goldfmid,while before the Board on the 25th of June
1804, give the Commiffioners of Naval Enquiry any information
refpeding the nett of the money market, at or during the cond
nuance of the lithe of the bills in quelthni ? I firmly believe be
did not.
Are you pofitive he did not ? I have a tolerable good memory,
and I Blond (wear, if called upon, to the belt of nay knowledge
and belief, that he did not.
Did Mr. Goldfmid float any fads or opinions to thew, that the
iffue of the bills in queflion was a more advantageous mode of
railing money, under the then exiling circumftances, than by an
iffue of Exchequer delis ? 1 firmly believe he did not.
In pcint of red, was any part cf Mr. Goldfmid's evidence
taken down, which did not appear to the Commiffioners of Nava)
Em ctoiry to be diredl anfwers to the queltions previouflf prepared
and put to him ? It ie impoffible tor ate on recolledliun Cu fay„but
I think it probable that Mr. Goland might have given anfwers
which were nut conflicted theca anfwers, and which Mr. Gold.
(mid might have altered or amended previous to the fair copy of his
evidence being mode.
Do you mean to fay, that no part of Mr. Goldfiniere anfwers
was omitted to be taken down, or was altered or amended, except
at his e x [-refs &Arc ?—I more atfuredly mean to fay, that Mr.
Golifinid's anfwers were not altered or amended except at his
expreli define, nor do 1 scow that any part of his anfwers were
omitted to be taken down.
Are his anfwers, as reported in the Appendix in the Eleventh
Report, in the very words tiled and dielated by him 1-1 t is his-
poMble for me to fay, but I believe they are as they were originally
taken down, or as they were amended by him.
Did any aufwers or words of Mr. Goldtinid, that you confidered
as irrelevant, relate In any way to the policy, utility, neeeffity, or
economy of the :mature of the Wile of Navy Bills ?—Thls is a
queftion that bat in faltance been put to me more than once, anol
I call GOD to witnefi, that I do not believe Mr. Goldfmid (laced
to the Conimiffioners of Naval Enquiry, any thing refpeeting the
policy, the utility, the neceffity, or the economy of that meafure.
Was all that Mr. Goldimid offered as evidence t. ken cloyed,
whether you confldered it relevant °rum, and entered in the Ap-
pendix ?-1 believe all that was offered by Mr. Gunflint' as evidence
in anfwcr to the queltions that were previcutly written and put to
him, was taken down; and I believe all that be offered as evidence
arrears in the Appendix to the Eleventh Report, except !Itch part
of the anfwers a- were :emended at his &flee.
Do you (peak from an wet recolleition of what pared in Mr.
Goinmid's evidence, (pacifically ou the 25th June and 9th July, or
only from your =collation of the general pradtice of the Board
—I (peak front the general predict of the Board, and front the
belt of my recolledlion with refpeet to Mr. GoldindiEs evidence.
What do you mean by the conliderable difficulties which the
Board had to obtain direct anfwers front Mr. Goldfmid ?-1 mean
to allude to Mr. Gold mold's confuted manner in didtatiog the an-
fwers to the queftionsput to him, and limit calling upon one Mem-
ber and then on another to explain his anfwers to them.
Did Mr. Goldfmid, at any time during his examination or rub-
requent to it, exprefs any diffatisfation to the Commiffioners at
the mode in which that examination was concluded, or any appre-
henfion that his evidence was imperially taken down?—Molt
affuredly not.
Did Mr. Goldfmid, in the eourfe. of his converfatlons with the
Commilfioners, Rate any thing tending to prove that his Majefty's
Government was either not jultitiable in dining Navy bills, or that
they had not adopted the belt mode of railing money for the (up-
porting of public credit ?—I believe not.
If kr. Goldfmid had made futh a fta:ement, Ronald you have
eonfidered it as fubjed mutter fur your Report ?—I believe not,
as the Commit:fiances of Naval Enquiry did not feel theinfelvee
authorifed to go in to fuck enquiry.
You having mentioned that all the queftions put to Mr. Gold-
(mid were written down before Mr. Goldfmid came to the Booed,
was that the cafe with regard to all the other witneffes whole evi-
dence appears in the Appendix to the Eleveath Report ?—lt has
been the general pradice of the Board to write down queftions
previous to the examination of • individuals, and to put loch fur-
ther queftions as may be =diary upon the matter that may a*
out of the evidence ; but it is inteeilinle for me to fay whether
the whole of the queftions put to the other witneffes, whole col
deuce appears in toe Appendix to the Eleventh Report, was writ-
ten down previous to their examination, without reading the
whole of the evidence given by then,. and conidering whether
the qeettions were or were nut written down previous to their ex-
etrioatioo.
Can you Rate why your reeollation, that every queßion put
to Mr. Goldfadd was written down previous to his coming be•
fore the tOard, is more paled than as to the examination of the
other witneifes ?—Becaule Mr. Coldfmid's examination is con&
derably floater than that of other witneffes, mid I hare particu-
larly directed my attention to the queftions put to Mead oldfain
Mice the litr'r g of this Committee.
Is it from the preterit view and confederation of the queftions
put to Mr. Colt:timid on the 25th of June, that you conclude, in
point of fait, the queftions were all written down previous to his
coming before you ?—lt is (ruin a belief that I did myfelf write
the queftioes down previous to Mr. Gail:niers examination.
7be Examination of the Right Hon. CHARLis LONG.

Can you Rate to the Committee, what the eircumftances were 1
that led to the ifrue of Navy Bills to Mr. Glentty at the end of
Odober 1304 ?—Upon the examination of the fupplies voted for
the fervice of the navy in the courfe of that year, it was found
that they would not he fufficicot to defray the capence that would
be incurred, and the iffue of theft Navy Bills was fuppored to be
the molt advantageous mode of making good the deficiency. •
Can you Rate by whom this mode of ifluing the Navy Bills in
queflion, for fupply ing the deficiency, was hilt fuogefl ed can-
not Rate puiitively by whom that mode was tuguelted, but the
meafurt was fakes; with tat roll miaow= of ilia Cluinccilor of
lb; f.oclo Tavr.

NEW MEDICINE ACT.
NEWBERY and SONS, No. 45, St. Paul's
. Church-yard, Lou: on, Proprietors of Dr. James's Powder,
and other valuable Preparations' inform the Public, that in mo-
rgue= of the new Stamp Duties, the price of that Medicine
will be in future as. cod. per Packet, or 11. ss. 6d. per Dozen;
but the Quantity of a Dozen Packe.s in a Bottle (as made up
for tie Army and Navy) may be had for 11. 4.. And u Stamps
arc prepzred, by order of the Commilßoners, for Marrs New-
bery's ferrate Ure, in which the Wards, " F. Newbery, No. 45,
St. Paul's" are engraved, and as ids prefumcd that this will be
a ruff•lent Security againit Counterfeits, his Signature on the La-
bels will be difeontinued. _ _

.....
The following are the prices of their Medicines, to tte fira
twenty of which Mr. Newbery's Stamps are affixed, bat thole who
purchafe fix or more at a titne,will he allowed the Stamps gratis.
Dr. James's Powder 2 9 Dalby's Carminative 1 9
a Bottle 24 o Dr. Aultin's Clialybeate
—An tie Pills 4 6 Pills - - 4 0
large Box 24 0 Freake'sTindt. of Bark 4 0
Dr. Steeres Opodeldoe 2 6 Ditto 1-lushant's ditto 3 0
....•COrlVUlfiUti Oil a 6 Tonic Bills . 2 9
—..-- Nitre Drops 2 6 Fnglifh Coffee - ' 2 9
----Camomile Drops a 9 Dr. Hoona's Pills a a
.....--.- I'arcgoris Lo- Grant's Drops a a
zenges I t I Inglifh's Scots Pills a o
Angibaud's Blots ditto Ili Hem; 's Magotha 2 6
El:fence of Colesfoot 3 6 Norton's Drops s 6
Mr. Spence's Dentifrice 4 o Spillbury's Drops 5 6
Cephalic Snuff s:i 9 Dr. Solander's 'rea 2 9
Jones's Rheum. Tindt. 3 6 Greenough's Tint:lures a at
Berry's Bilious Pills 4 6 Ditto Tole Lozenges xat
litence of Peppermint aat Lffence of Ginger 2 9
Giafs's Magnefia 3 6
N.B. As many Perron!, particularly T rengers, miftake the
houfe of Alarm Newbery, they think it neeeffary to point out,
that it is at the Salt end of St. Paul's, four (lours from Cheadle,
with there Words itifcribed on the front—
. _ -

" Tin ONLY WARILHOVIC FOR Da. 'Angel PON,DIII."

HAVING dedicated tayicir to the (lady, azd
gratified by the mAt confi,lerable praetice in that branch
which I thought proper to felea, I truft that I have cot more it if
ern2loyed my time then thoic. who, In the extenfive 9z7.: of It:le
twee/Am. are mar:finally immerfed in uncertainty, an 4 cannot.
always attain that fuccds which is acquired ky coneentreting the
intellettual Fwer to one dale of droracra.
The dileafes of DEBILITY arc peculiarly diftrAng for they
bring with them a •run of concomitant fyraptorns, by a de-
prellion of all vital energy, esiltence Welt becomes emNitterol—•
Whether they wife from the provalet-e of ill example, thedeftruce
tive habits of fehool-boys, or the iniuhtences of tratue ty. they re.
quire the moft al:Linens proccelonal ; tt•y the I,,toranee
or uneducated sten, the iyinptoms are aggravated, an/ tha con lt-
' tution is deftroyed,
Asa hIRPAIIIM of the ROYAt. COLLSOBei SURGEONS
I ground my pretenfioos on regularity of education; and poff.-ifing
every privilege to praetice. I fed myfelf wetted to that confidence
with which I have, hitherto been fo honoured.
in the finft re/trattoria of local wealtnefs, early applimtion will
prevent the calamity of a debilitated frame; but where the fuf
ferer, from a conrdoufners of the unman/Ines of the vice whict
Goofed his misfortune, is fearful of the contempt or cenfure of his
family pbyfician and broods over hie infirmity with careful cot
ceattnent. it omit be fatisfadtory for him to he allured not only uf
capability of treatment, but alfo of the moft inviolable fecrecy.
And In recent Venereal Complaints it is poflible to prevent pale,
danger or diftrma ; In the molt complicated cafes it is the acquire-
ment of excledive experience in this hue to ctedi a fare, certain
sand Incedy re-eftabliihment.
offer the advantage of this experience to tholi of either fez who
are affliEted with any kind of DEBILITY. of any fymptoens of
VENEREAL INFECTION, and in all cafes the terms of remu
neradon are Rated on the firft interview.

Pat•enain the country are expel-led to Indore a Pink cote, ane
are requdted to fpedfy their age a,,3 manner o! Jiving.
MARTIN 111111 E,
Member of the Royal College of Surgeons In London
No 89, Arad/oar:et, WoriJr neat craple Da.

SCARCE AND VOLDAIILE -A,NTiQU'i. COINS.
To be 1)IS1'O ED OF' a FIVf.-GUINEit
PIECE of GOLD COIN, William and Mary. ann • 1.0,
hcllcved to he nearly calque ; a' GUINEA, HALF €R
and SHILLING, of the fame reign; a GUINEA, chwi„ )1
anno 1677, very fc..rce ; an antique COLO COIN, Fze tang
than half a guinea, 'tvi:h charaElers fuppof,d Peak ; a G 4 )1 I)
COIN, fame size as the La, bf the. Landcrave of hen
anno 1737 ; a large SILVER COIN, lir.: u: a ertwea o"cm:a
Hen. Eke. Cologne. anno 1441); alfu a LIMA SHILLING Gt.,.
IL 1745. Application to Vieffrs Elate (I by Lutz
putt paid), will he attended to. .

TO MERCHAN FS AND WHOLESALE GROCERS.
TO BE I.E
For a Term of Years, and entered upon immediately,
11H E Ex TENSIVE 1111 d VALUASLI WA RE.
. HOUSES and other PREMISES, fituote as. F.A3
SIDE of the SANDHILL. Nv.wcAs 11. E UPON- 11',Sr:.
within a kV, ya7dx of the River., lately orcupled by Mr. Limn
Atkinfoo Rudniag,dezeofed, the boOntfs ga a wyowahe
Grocer and the fix Trade have for many ymrs beau c:rriel nu to
a great extent.— Flee Regrinds is intended to he enstioued until the
Premitcs are Ict. The connexions of Cie H nee acothe fig i g egss
North of England, and the Stock in Trade will he d (141(.4 al on
Terms highly advantageous to a purrhafer.
For particulars apply to Mt. Baker on the Pnauiti, or at Ai-.
Wa!ters's Office, Pilgrim-Bre, t, Newcaftle.

LKel'iß FROM DEAL un 012. Stlttikcr t,i DEAFNEfii.
To the Proprietor of Dr. Tayl•tr's Rented,
S:r, " Peal, Mar t. 1805,
g 4 VIAVING feen the Names of feVend l'edons,
11 publiated in the Sun, who haw received benefit rem th,
invaluable Retnealy fur 1). of ere ; i beg leave to inform you, that
1 have lately received a eumpizt.: cure, after h.tying Iron .lepric,tl
of My hearing fur the bit five year.. 1 have tired one battle.
1 remain, Sir, pew mull °Wird humble Servant,
•• JOHN AIRIN."
P. S. You are et Sherty to make what ore you ',leak of it.
The original I cater may he feed at Ntra. Matthews, boAftiter,
13. Strand, London. of wilt m •itt: n mcdy may he had,

DIXON'S celebrated it N at I.l6Lis tfCCS,
yrepared by Mr. Diten, Apothecary, arc a ern do cur:. foe
Bill: ui.Gouty, and Rheumatic I,i:orders. Nrtvous and Sick I had
Atha, !lean-born, FLatuicucies, Weak,efs of the s.nulaci., laeprd.
Gun of Spirits, indigellian, and Frc Living. Sec.
They are ufcd zrd recommended by tire Royal Family. rise r&
eountiffes Buckingham and Unities, the IDow,ger I a ly SI and
Sete, the Lords Klimain and Ki-g, the lion. 1. Malrey,Sir R Wit.
Hams, M. P. and fume tinauf.nda of the Nubility, Clergy, as.l Ma.
dical Gentlemen.
In addition to the nuinhcr or Letters Mr. Dixon, Apothecary,
has received, is the following, from Cape. Lloyd, of the Guards: .
"Dale Caltl-, II tverfordwca. Sou: h Wad., Feb 14, 'Sit.
" Capt. Lloyd preftnt a his co leplitatents to Mr Disou (slitsougt;
not perfonally acquainted with hi.r.). would take it As a ',sour if
he would fend him lour or five B ,sea of his Milt a, f um as lie put:
fibly can. Mrs. Lloyd, who has always used the Mediciue, is now
pr:gnant, and very uawell ; and we cum.* get them a:ly where in
this county, neither at ILverfordw.:fl nor Carmarthen; the neat
ett place they are fold at is &lila For the great fcrvice they have
been to Mrs Lloyd, as well as Colonel Bilopp and all hi, Eimily,
Capt. Lloyd feels it his da-y to rceunarnmel the Pitt, w!acevcr he
goes, and he really thinks if Mr. 111 x on would appoint fame mix*
as Venders in this County it would be a benefit to the mammary.*
Dienn's Antibilious fills are fold whnlcf le aid retail at Mr.
Beithes. No. 4,Cheapf de, corner of raterrulter row, and retail
by Smith and Scott, Edinburgh : M'Conalel, Glz(guw : Greg"
Liverpool; Staines, Man,Lefier ; ;Vo- er, Fatter; Wills, Ply.
mouth &Urn, Po tryou:h ; Macdonald's. Gligow ; GITO4,
13.1rhadoes; B.ich, New Yolk; and by mad; Leolefeliers and Mc-
dicine Venders in every town, in butes at as. yd. tuch.
Obtrac the name of " IL ILieer, No. celicapekierlsengraved
on the Stamp, which is affixed to each how.

iik-.-

COM(l:i't AN rt-impti IGh.NkS.

DR. JOHN HUN FElt and many other medical
men have treated mafterly on cartain complairts. hut they
all fillow the Reps of theft. prodeccEurs. Mercury, Mercury, is
(till their grand climat eric! and wh'i.:ll, at twithftanding al its
alledged improvements and consbenaTiens, is Mercury never belch!
But the Anti linpttigenes has long been ailed in au cuenftvepti-
vate pradiee, and in a multiplicity of inflances found to be a lb.
vereign, a life, a fvedy, and e flati tad remedy far every Itage and
fymptom, and is the beft lubltitutc ever difcrivered in,r ..‘,ereury ;
it fweetens the blood, and itienulatee it to excel all tonna& and im-
pure juices; gives Strength cr.d tone to the nerves, enlivens and in-
vigorates, at one and the fame time, both body and miliel; it juttly
claims a pre eminence over all °the:- medicines, being decid.dity
adapted for the fpeedy removal of there complain•s as well as the
feure•y, fcrofula, King's Evil, and even the leprofy idelf ; it is not
to be paralleled in the wh le hialeria Medi:a
high as the 'acuity now (laud to the opinion of the world, their
' fandlion is daily given to this z•imirahle prrparaion, which takes
its name on let the authority of the great Cullen of Edinburgh (by
whole Nofulngy on the Pradlica or Pity:re every Itylician is sh-
redded ;) its elßeacy being well eft .lltifted for thole clirlul cale
mines which compreheakorhutic, leprous, femfulotari,anel vene-
real complaints, for which the Anti.-Itryctigcncsis happily adapted.
Haifa-Guinea a Bottle, with copious folio dir,ctioni, co enable
pet lons to cure theinfelves, lit which many actrac•clieaf-y cafe* are
publifiied. There are alto loudly Bottles. ccutsiairg the quantity
of four at les. 6d. for In. by which 9s. ate laved.
Note—Each bottle tat a Government Stamp, with the name
• Sand. Solomon, Liverpool,' cligrsved thereon, to imitate will& ia
felmv.
Sold in London by Mrs. Mathews, a?, Strand ; Dizey and Sut-
ton, Bow Church-yard; Bacon, tsa, 0 ribill4treet • P:dding.76,os-
ford ftreet.oppolits. the Pantheon; Butler, 4,Cheaptide ; dia.:lay and
Son, Ilea -market; S!Dsv and Edwards, 66, St. Paul's Church-
yard; Howard and Evans, Long-Lane, Welt-Smittalield; aud par-
ticularly at the foUrawMg places, viz.
Brad. Mn Shit:rein( Lynn, Pigge
Bath, Hazard Mancheiter, Staines
Berwick, Carr NI iryar,•, Silver
Balioitt ke, Hulbert l'elciall•am, lio•re
Bradford, Wilts, Hopkins Maidenhead, :haul!
Bridport, R• b•rcs • Nlalroftury, Lea
Bridgwater, Poole 1h1.4:111ing...1%T, Wilkinfoa
Bawdley, Prmthigon N •rtirghatn, liur:E.g.: & Suet
Steelier, Stephens ton
Ltr,raf.rd, Nit bury NewealUe upon Tyne,Hutchao-
Bratntofter Hine foil and Cu.
tillo•us W;lthatn, Jennings • Norwich, St, vorfon
Baintree, Shearcrutt . E ewp•rt, Ille af W Ight, Albie
Coeentiy, ivierrith w Nlntwich, Snelfon
cauterbuiy, Briftow °Cor,'llrY• Edwards
Caatur, 1;•.oth 11, tin; h, Smithy
Chatham, Ethaingtos Partial', J. and W. Breland
Candu Mae, Hodfria Partin •uth, Sharpe
Cticp,tow, Marna Plymouth' Nettleton
Clapham, Batten Plym orth Dock , Holland
Dover, Neale) htektuaidWorrh, Nona
Dina •hle, („),ccniborongis It Ili hford, Wads
Dud" y, Harding Sbellield, Pierian
Deptf:ret, Davits Stonfurtiadsle wituink
Denham, Barker •Stsfford, Monaca
Dahlia, No. 6. College Green, Shrewfbury, Wood
Dugdale, Colwell, Buil S'o,rls.o.nae, t:eadby and Gs.
Edinburgh, A. Smith, North S- smut elbstr, Night
Bridge Selaihrorp•oli, Baker
Exeter, Trewania and $Oll Sal•fbury, Coi: ma
Ely, Brat kenbury Shdtlbuiy, Adams
Fr :me, lialiall Salim Walden; Paine
Giauceller, Jones St.•mbridge, Ro lafun
Griport, Hurling Shistou Mallet, Carey
GainCaorsiugh, Towne Brockton, Ci•rtftupher & Jens&
Greenwich, Braise Tav Bch, Row,
Glafjosr, Aneus M‘Donald • Twickenham. Mortimer
Hull, J. Radford Tunbridge Wells,Ktlislei
Honicaftle, Weir lsrost bridge, s lung
liammerimith, Roberts • rttoseter, t•I den
li, eaky on Thames, Norton Whitby, T, oman
Hanley, Altman and San Whitchaven, Croftwaite
Hes ham, Diekinfon Warkfworth. Taylor
, Ipfwich, Harmer and Green Wisolfar, Blakeney
invernefs, Wiens& Wuttotionader.E.dge, Bence
Esitiatsford, Leech Welli:,ptan, Salop, Houlltoa
Keivedon, Fux Woivrehan•rt n, Simplon
Leeds, Mims Wild r, WAley
!decrying!, Rayfat Welch Punie, Griei.hs
Lank. r, Grearary York, Wilton and Co.
Lancalter, Clark
And all the Venders of Patent Medicines In the United Kingdom •
HIGH WATER AT LONDON lIRIGGR. TO-MORRO W .
Maiming •• • to -drums after il
Alterman - ' ' 43 minutes eta 8
----

LONDON : Printcd m d PubliE•ed by LEVEL KEN r (of C. •
tcrlv4try pkce. Lam'leth), at the Stitt Orrici, No. I, c L-..r
area. kublifbalalfo du Sma Tonigol.4,