The Sun.
London, England, 1816-11-30 00:00:00

PRIVATE CORRESPONDENCE.

PAnts, Nov. 26.—The principal topic of dis-
course at present is the late conduct of M.de Tal-
leyrand. Since his return from Valency he has
missed no opportunity to profess Royalist opi-
nions, and on every occasion has spoken of the
Ministry with at once aversion and contempt.—
This was remarked by all parties, but it produced
no great sensation; as, when lie was at Paris
about three months ago, lid already seemed to
lean that way. However, about ten days ago,
at the British Ambassador's, addressing himself to
M.Pasquier, lie made a most violent attack upon
the Ministry, upon the Minister of Police in par-
ticplar, and upon M. Pasquier himself, asking hiin
how he, whom be (M. de Talleyrand) had thought
lit to fill a Mioiitry ender his owl) AdmittiAratioo,
cookd cyntleticenti to Jet his present part 'nutter
such an Administt a..On as HOW eXiSted and
whrther a Prettiqcot of the Honse Of Deputies
ought not to bluish at going to the Police to re-
ceive directions how he should conduct himself the

•.
next day ? M. Pasquier Was of course extremely
embarrassed ; to refine was impossible ; the rack
and existence of :11. de Tallevratid did not tillms.

.- -
him to' use his usual overbearing way, and he
solved the. difficuly'by going away, after saying
that such a question could not--be discussed in
that place and company. M. de Talleyrand re-
ceived shortly after a letter from the Mike de la
Chatre (as Premier Gentilhomme de la Chamtre de
serviced who Informed him, that in consequence
of the language he had used at the English Am-
bassador's its .his conversation with the President
of the Chamber of Deputies, he was desired to
absent himself from Court. M. de Talleyrand
answered, that he should' certainly obey the or.-
ders he had just received ; that, however, the
only part of his conduct which appeared to.hint-
sell to deserve any animadversion, was the having
introduced to thenotice-ot his Majesty some in-
dividuals whom he, M. de Tallcyrand, lrad oily
lent ned to appreciate since;
M. de .Talleyrand has evidently wished to con-
viuce the Royalist party that not only he will act
with them, and against his former proteg4 the
Minister of Police, but that, it he were to come
again into administration, he would discard the
revolutionary party Irons his councils. His attack

upon Patqui-er7, One ,of the chiefs, is clearly a
thing calculated beforehand, and his exclusion
from Court is to him of no consequence whatever.
In spite of the assistance the Royalist party would
derive from his accession, I much doubt whether
they will choose to act untie*. this chief, howeVer
preferable he is to the present men, or rather
Mal) use Royalist Deputies, who are almost all
men of the strictest honour, will hardly like to
follow the banners of any man whose moral cha-
racter will slot stand as severe a fest as their own.
M. de Chatesubriand moved on Saturday, in
the House of Peers, " that an,Address be pre-
sewed to Isis Majesty, to 'request him to establish:
an inquiry iato all that had token place at' the
late elections. This was negatived without a di-
vision but it will afrorti an opportunity of print-
ing the speech, which was only a tew lines, and
the papers anucxed to it, %Welt will, I suppose,
be far more voluminous, ' • •

The Revolutionary party in the House of De-
p`oties is not so iractahle as the Ministers would
wish : already in the bureaux several of this party
are recalcitrant about the budget : itAntsst be own-
ed they are very difficult to please, if the conduct
of the Alittistsy does not satisfy them.
cannot understand why the Royalist party
have delayed their attack upon initters ; I think•
they are very wrong : it is, however, the result
of system, and the party acting. all together, like
one man, must always possess an immense weight,
even.thoogh the path they follow should nut be
the beSt possible.—(Tiines.)