The Sun.
London, England, 1820-10-12 00:00:00

or from any other circumstances which occurred
at the , time, she entertained any- apprehen-
sion for her personal safety'—Her Royal High-
ness did entertain such an apprehension, for she
mentioned it to me.

Did she in consequence of her apprehensions
wish to be more closely protected and attended
by the male part of her establishment, or express
her wishes to that effect to you ?—l'heard her
Royal Highness frequently mention the attack,
and say she would have some person to be al-
wayt near her. I cannot now recollect her pre-
cise words.

I beg to ask whether 'you yourself, or Mr.
Flynn, or any other 'person on board the ship,
could not have answered that purpose much bet-
ter than a landsman ?-1 imagine if that were the
only cause, a seafaring man would be most capa-
ble of rendering assistance.

Would he not have protected her Royal High-
ness Letter from the rolling of the ship ?—L-He

Will the witness. state the occasion or cause of
his quarrel with Baron o,upteda.
The Loup :CHANCELLOR. here apprehended,
that the question could not be so put, as they
could not-ask the cause of a quarrel. •

Did any circumstance occur at her Royal
Highness's residence to your knowledge, that
occasioned the quarrel between you and Oinp-
teda ?--It was by the confession of a servant ; I
saw him upo►► his knees, begging pardon for his
crime.

The LORD CHANCELLOR here remarked, that
the witness had stated he saw a servant on
knees, and bezging pardon for his crime. But
if it was intended to mention what that servant
said, it must be proved by himself at their Lord-
ships' bar.
Before whom was the servant kneeling ?--Be-
fore her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales.
What was the servant's name ?—Maurice
Grady.

Here the Earl of LAUDERDALL said he wished
to know how the last questions and answers could
stand upon the evidence ; which objection gave
occasion to a series of remarks from Earl Gaty
and Lord HoLLAND, and during which explana-
tions took place between Earl GREY and the
Earl of LAUDERDALE.

The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that the witness
had been asked what was the cause of the quarrel,
and the fair inference from his answer was, that
the confession of the servant had led to that
quarrel, but nothing mere was said. If the servant
were not called to the Bar, it would be a waste of
their Lordships' time to discuss the point, as the
whole evidence on the subject would go for no-
thing.

After some remarks from the Marquess. of
BUCKINGII.IIII, the earl of CARNARVONt and the
,Marquess of DEVONSHIRE, the witness was next
asked where Maurice lived at the time, who an-
swered, that he was a servant to the Princess of
Wales.

-Witness was then asked, if it was in conse.
quence of any thing communicated by her Roy a
Highness to him that he called out Baron ()alp.
teda

This question was objected to by the Earl of
Lauderdale, but defended by Earl Grey. Here-
upon the Lord Chancellor said, that the wit-
ness's quarrel with Baron Otnpteda, had nothing
to do with the issue ; this was his objection to
the question last put ; and he would not be doing
his duty if he did not say, decidedly and plain-
ly, that the question could not be put.
Explanations then took place between the
Earl of Liverpool and Earl Grey, respecting the
propriety of their Lordships not putting ques-
tions that were not within the rules of law, in
order to avoid loss of time, and giving rise to dis-
cussions that were useless. .

The witness was then asked if he knew where
Maurice. Grady was, in answer to which he
stated that he ' had heard he was in Eng-
land, but did *jot know where he now
lived, or with whom:* Ile added, in consequence
of another question put, that when in her Royal
Highness's suite, he did not converse with the in-
ferior servants of her house, that he never had
mentioned the Baron Ompteda to Majocci, nor
Majocci to him.

Witness left under his examination by their
Lordships.