The Sun.
London, England, 1820-11-10 00:00:00

FIVE PER CENTS.

Monday
DEFLRRED STOCK
Of the 22d Sept. 1819 97 f. 35 c.
gid Sept., 1820 93 f. 50 c•
I
at NAPLES, OCT. 40.—1 S is said that the Province o
lermo will he placed under a Military Government. 0,411 C
" The intentions of the Cabinet of Vienna are -very
to us, but it is thought that the Etupecei of Austria
concert with his Allies, be induced to usaintain peace.

,11.1
The Times of this day contains the folio.: ce
libel upon the Milan Commissioners, who ''Ao9
not been heard in answer to the infamous clia,r,:ct
against them! ! The Public cannot but reco“:v
the high panegyric which the LORE. CILOCkij/
LOR pronounced upan Mr. COOKE, who losrpi
the head of that Commission, and who his I)°,, to!
ship, after au intimacy of fifty years, declar'to.
be one of the most upright and intelligent met'
had ever known : OPI
" Lord Ktmo proposed a clause, the object of which '',;(it(fi
substitute the Milan Commissioners for the QuitEN, 'oeif
subject those rascals ,to specific Pains and Penalties Wino.'
conspiracy and subornation, instead of the innocent vie:n.ol
their eats. We recollect to have beard of an instance ' bud
French Revolution, when, a respectable citizen bei0g1:011'
to be guillotined, the attendants slipped the chief execi:totil
into his place, and turned the operation of the law a1:314,6
last and basest agent. The intended sufferer was dui' 1,0"
to his country and to hi, friends. The proposal of
KING would have led to a similar result."

The QtrxEN proceeded to the House of 14°1

to-day about 12 o'Clock. ,
Letters from Naples to the c'Oth October I'd
received yesterday morning. The accounts '5O,
Palermo, which they contain, give a most (110,4
trous-picture of the transactions which took Polo
on the entrance of the Neapolitan tronPs,,jetil
that city. In consequence of an arran'recO
made with General PEPE., the Neapolita;O:p
under his command were to have entered the
escorted by the Civic Guard, which was c.cil
posed of Noblemen and Gentlemen of resPeelii'
bility ; the populace, however, attacked the '1 et
Guard, and having made themselves maste„rdi•
their arms, proceeded against the Neapol",:el'
whom they repulsed. Much fighting ei3,!frodt
and the armed mob committed every kind o'
rage, murdering several of their fellow-cajAiwg
These tumultuous and sanguinary procee'lie
r were fortunately put a stop to by the Couvel'
which was concluded with General Puru, 001:
ing to the Sicilians an independent Pariiaroe
and thus was tranquillity for the motnellt
established. ifej
Other letters of the same date were reel
yesterday. They express the astonislunen thi
the writers at the reports just received, ;1,4
London Letters and Journals, of the advall;illc
the Austrian troops into their territory, airoer
disturbed state of the interior, both which
it 0\
• declare never to have had any founda,,ti° :pli,l
truth. Intelligence had been obtained at
from Palermo up to the evening of the lit i'to
which time the citizens continued still
the rejection of the Treaty by the Parliall'e;
Naples. The Neapolitan General (PEPE), 'lOl
taking possession of the forts and batteriesyid
proceeded to deprive. the s inhabitants of opt'
arms. This measure had then been in acticet
ration for two days, not the smallest distroloieli
ing entertained but that the stipulations
Treaty would be fulfilled ; and strong s,
hopes-
,.therefore entertained that, when the ne
their actual situation arrived, they would ~s
19
capable of resistance. The interior of
described to be in a dreadful state, infestcf tt
guerillas and hordes of banditti, forined,°ol'
dregs of the populace, who had acquire" oP,
during the recent disturbances, and who olio'
• . sisted by the indiscriminate plunder-of if-
sand enemies.

As we 1

circulated

and as w e ti

°NP~~Siti

. .
Brop,r i()
moss %Thiel
%sect to 11
HuLY Otti
It
IVriter, Ira

littertr,l t
ti
%/tisTtnN
trust the

\,lio has
si
Ihioto thv
lenibers
and as th:
2,l,putt
kitulll't

1. I)
ttrt

.
t. 1.
d'P

4.
e
4ttt,,
4,
4114
that

Whio

t„-ct',

405

Ur
VP'
ar
11;

r.

HOLY ORDERS.

!,ss. Pr'
761 •

.•
45.
, 69i.

ZO
tt

D.
.'

Pecs
nurub

lateds tie

(c) I Tim. ii. 4.

csident a/

ent {t"

[r. It'bercrs
ougb

(d) See Article IX.

)c.91,

04'1)
ery t
ria
ice.

.04
'ollol.e
vlto
cliarrecalpct
;ThAscroil
.0 wasrk
pis VA" to'
clarevite

l'nio
hie' olio
:EN oef.
ie
'Of I of
ntsvicti°lto
0, in ot
;an tto
cxeca,
6titsi
aCairloce
5 thti, 1,"
,sal

of Lori

AsWe have
to c reason believe that our Paper is
tati:6led among a considerable body of the Protestant Clergy,
as we have been favoured with many valuable articles na
in
apposition to the Claims of Porter, we deem it
11
:per 10 give this day at length those admirable QUES-
vb NS Which the Bishop of PETERBOROUGH has lately pro-
ti'ed to those who apply to his Lordship as Candidates for
ii("()RDEßs.—These QuesTioNs have excited great atten-
mn. in the Ecclesiastial World, and several anonymous
raters have published objections against them. We have
'44stiterted three excellent articles in defence of these important
ft "'Ns, and we shall insert to-morrow a fourth number,
:ins the same sound, intelligent, and respectable Author,
hips
'lgnified his intention to proceed till he has fully exa-
kcnvt? the whole series. But as there must be a great many't'evs of the Church who have not yet seen the Qu • MON',
%till,a
al ►
theY comprise doctrines that eminently conduce to t.h.e
.
theeort
7 pure Christianity, we conceive it our duty to gist.
allthe publicity in our power.
qt7PST •
.-,IONS proposed to CANDIDATES for HOLT OR-
stl44. so arranged under Heads or Chapters, that they
ay t•xliihit a Connected View of God's Dealings with
cu.:l2,endi.r the NEW COVENANT.
)1;1:11 1.---OF REDEMPTION BY JESUS CHRIST.
ello;;-'1,1 Christ die for all men ? Or did he die only for a
• Itn f,"v (a)
lee Christ died for all men, and the free gift of God, there-
ei
npon all men to justification (b), may we thence
?de, that all men will be actually saved ?
to,js) nut God himself willing that all men should be
(c)
all nilf then Christ died for all men, and God it willing that
4 should be saved, must not they who fail of salvation,
Rrit)irough their own fault ?
"es it not then behove us to inquire into the terms of our
atri '''lttion that we may learn to do what is necessary
,on
towards the obtaining of everlasting salvation .
,s
tltos2 it not necessary, in order to scvire a knowle(lge, of
left 61ernis, to examine ; first, the state in which we were
toot
slats Y the WI of Adam; and secondly, our deliverancefrom
‘hrongh the death of Christ ?
onsult Rom. viii. 32. 2 Cot. v. lb. 1 Tim. ii. 6. 1 3nhn
ry
Sralso the Consecration Prayer in the Commtoinntt iime
,3 „elief'?e, anti the Church Catechism in the answer
"r. Wa h t dust thou chiefly learn in the Articles of • y B
(h) Rom. v. 18.

CHAP. II: OF ORIGINAL SIN.
h•
to it "-'id the fall of Adam produce such an effect on his pos- ,
tiuu/Vilat mankind became thereby a mass of mere corrup-
olitia of absolute and entire depravity? 9r. is the effect
ti e,4, 'chi that we are very far gone from original righteous-
*. „stud of our own nature inclined to evil.? (a)
a,oes the notion of man's total corruption, or absolute
rti,lavitY, produce in general (what is considered its chief
4).'",lueudation) a deep sense of humility
:LE, OI'S not the frequent repetition of the doctrine, that we
Ihtt.ut only far gone from righteousness, hut are nothing
de alter than a mass of mere corruption and depravity, a ten-
-4.2Y, to destroy all sense of virtue, or moral goodness
411 a ts it possible, that a doctrine, which tends to destroy
1_11,4",e of virtme, or moral goodness, should .be a doctrine
comes from God ?
Do we exalt the Creator by degrading the Creature ?
tit,
vh,‘ advantage then ean we derive fron a dotrine.
," converts mankind into a mass of absolutet c
•and entire
ea
vity

1. Is
CHAP. Hl.----OE FREE WILL.
n the power of Man, without the assistance
, i
to do what is pleasing and acceptable to God ? (a)
tudwl not divine assistance necessary even to obtain the will
so ?
a•
41 out when we have the will to.do what is pleaslngto God,
I'. 141 tlle grace of God " working with us (c)," and thus
Vig our infirmities (d) ?"
k 4'Mid tt not be absurd to say, that the grace of God is
evuoi',liing with us," if we ourselves had no share in the

th„t lt not then contrary to our tenth Article to declare,
Nlan has no share in tile work of his own salvation ?
(;„4:tliougli the power, which we possess, is derived from
runs"lees
when God has given us power, does it not rest with
to exercise that power ?
I.,;rd!) is,, there is res not Stliber. Paul declare, that where the Spirit of the
(e) ?
'Thoughl it is G. who enables us both to will and to do,
Rocve not required in Scripture to exert that ability, and to
„4 oat our own Salvation (f) ?
f• Is it not then contrary to Scripture to say, that man has
7liace in the work of his salvation ?
that °- Are any advantages to be derived from the doctrine,
i GUI] is the sole Agent in the work of }?fan's salvation ?
ki. Is not the power of God equally manifested, whether he
rri:er"tes oil man immediately as on a mere passive object, or
through the agency of man him-
which Creator of all things, he must
Previously imparted ?
to'''. Is it necessary then to deny the agency of man, in order
laornote the
th Glory of God
Has not e doctrine, that man himself has no share in
e'e •
,ew''k of his own salvation, a tendency to make him indif-
fl;ll in regard to his moral conduct ?
re:* Can a doctrine, which renders men indifferent with
(1,)1,;1•::l. to their mural conduct, be a doctrine, that comes from
(ad See Article X. (b) Th. (c) lb.
f,
Rom. viii. 26. (r) 2 Car. iii. 17. (f) Phil. ii. 12.

Ca AP. IV.—OF JUSTIFICATION.
SECT, ,
"14 A.—O./Justification, iu reference to everlasting Se
vat ion.
fml: Does not the Church of England distinguish Justification
,210 everlasting Salvatioa (a) ?
the• Do not our Articles represent Justification as preceding
Performance of all our,good works (b) ?
a
nut therefore our Justification (as the term is used
In nu Articles (c),) take place in this present world ?
4 is
or ti not everlasting Salvation the same as everlasting
5. IPlnness in the world to came ?
not then our Justification the mere commencement of
which, in the general scheme of Redemption, ever-
last'n,l Salvation is the end ?
,%("r• IL—of Justification, in reference to its cause.
" 1.
jii,;'"" not the eleventh Article declare, that we are
15" by y. Faith )" os
stre '-'"vt. nut the expression " Faith only"' derive additional
ngth from the negative expression in the same Article
aml riot for our own works ?"
a
wortp"es not therefore tire eleventh Article exclude good
.we 's !rum all share loathe otfice of Justifying ? Or can
4..%.leo,,tudostgrouLt,lvieortkesrT " Faith" in that Article, as to make
Ow, "0 not the twelfth and thirteenth Articles further ex-
jui7 them, the one by asserting that good works follow after
~,e(i"9cation, the other by maintainint, that they cannot pre-
e
5. Can that, which never precedes an effect, be reckoned
€.",,g the causes of that effect ?
perf,`-an we then, consistently with our Articles, reckon the
I,,,trrnance of good works among the causes of Justification,
'ttt'ver qualifying epithet be used with the term cause ?
...Justift
r,ference-go,..the tinie when
. WI it takes place.
I
tit, ten are i„stified, are we riot, in the words of the
entb Article, " accounted righteous before God ?"
0„, ,"`',l' we are accounted righteous before God, and so
acc"
for Cite merits of our Lord and Saviour Jesus
Christ are we nut then admitted to the benefits of the
Christian Covenant ?
is not therefore our Justification our Admission to the
Christian Covenant
tit(a) In the very first Homily, and in the very Exordium of
at Homily, we find the expression " Justification and ever.
lasting salvation." If the disjunitive particle had been eta-
itYed, the terms might hare been considered as of similar
"rt• But in such a case it would be tautology to employ
le conjunctive particle.
(1)) According to Article XII. good works " follow after
u"iflcatiun." And according to Article XIII. we are even
i
"capable of doing good works, heture we are justified.
• (c.ialso in the same sense by St Paul. (d) Ar•
tide XI.

CIIAr. V.-Or EVERLASTING SALVATION'.
'Photigh we are justified, or admitted into covenant with
d, through the merits of Chi ist, if we have but faith in
those
!nvrits, and though we are thus admitted even before
our faith has
produced 'good works, does not the performance