The Sun.
London, England, 1829-05-13 00:00:00

pI V I DNS.

John Albra, Chelmsford, innkeeper, ?tiny 19, at elevep,
at the Court of Commisioner3.
fiecrge Page, Cranbourne-street, silk-mereer, June 5,
at twelve, a tlie Court of Commissioners.
John Anthony Gill6rt, George-lane, Botolph-lAne, mer-
chant, June 2, at ten, at the ‘..7ourt of Commissioners.
Joseph Deakin, Crawford-street, Zlarvlebone, linen-
' draper, May 26, et eleven, at the Court of 4Cortiraitisioners.
Richard Rutlidge, ItYeedon Beck, Northamptonshiie,
I plumber, May 19, at ten, at :ix Court of Commissioners.
Samuel Lawless, New Sarum, Wiltshire, victualler,
June 4, at eleven, at the Three Swans lun, Vmaltsterew Sarum.
'William Robinson, Botesdale, Suffolk, , June
at nine, at the Crown Inn, Botesdale.
1 Julio Wilka and Jacob Willes, jun,r Slgnsf4l Mill,

Sowerby, Yorkslike, flax-spinners, June 10, at three, at
the White Lion Inn, Halifax, Yorkshire.
Edward Hales, Birmingham, corn-dealer, June 5, at
twelve, at the Royal Hotel, Birmingham.
Charles Hoppe, King-street, Cheapside, merchant, May
19, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners.
William Scowcroft, Haverfordwest, wine-merchant,
June 4, at ten, at the Castle Inn, Haverfordwest.
Henry Robert Plaw, Riches-court, Litne-street, mer-
chant, May 26, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners.
James Stevens, Norwich, yarn-factor, June 3, at five,
at the Castle Inn, Norwich.
William Pace, Hastings, Sussex, surgeon, June 4, at
one, at the Swan Inu, Hastings.
Edward Johnson, Kingston-upon-Hull, linen-draper,
June 4, at twelve, at the George Inn, Kingston-upon-Hull.
Samuel Crane and Henry Samuel Crane, Stratford,
Essex, merchants, June 5, at eleven, at the Court of
Commissioners.

Christopher Alderson, Lawrence Pountney-place, Can-
non-street, flour-factor, May 22, at two, at the Court of
Commissioners. _

Thomas Clark and George Bryson, Bridge-r)ad, Lam-
beth, linen-irapers, June 2, at ten, at the Court of Com-
tnissioners. _ _

John Thompson, Fenchurch-street, merchant, May 22,
at nine, at the Court of Commissioners.
Nathaniel Bragg, Whitebaven, Cumberland, butcher,
June 8, at twelve, at the Globe Inn, Cockermouth, Cum-
berland.

CERTIFICATES-JUNE 2.

Abner Rangeley, Hayfield, Derbyshire, cotton-spinner.
Thomas Wynn, Wingate, Bath, dealer.
Thomas, John, and William Simmons, Wincbcombe,
Gloucestershire, road-contractors.
W. Bloxam, Abingdon-street, Westminster, merchant.
Thomas Clark, Hesket, Cumberlaud, cattle-dealer.

Felix Jones, jun., Bristol, mason.
Richard Dunn, Arabella-row, Pimlico, appraiser.
J. Berridge, George-yard, Whitcomb-street, stable-
keeper.
James Harris, Gracechurch-street, auctioneer.
Peter Burns, Liverpool, livery-stable-keeper.
Robert Ho!Kite, aibergham Eaves, Lancashire, com-
mon-brewer.

PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED.
Timothy Seigley and Robert Kirby, Banbury, Oxford-
shire, drapers.
Thomas Brooks and William Osbaldiston, Manchester,
fent-dealers.

Thomas Smith, sen., and Thomas Smith, jun., Fen-
church-street, coffee-brokers.
Henry Newman and John Newman, London, drapers.
William Ball and John Ball, Blandford-Forum, Dorset-
shire, coachmakers.
John Beare, London, and Thomas Hay, Kidwelly, Car-
marthenshire, tin-plate-manufacturers.
R. Culledge and C. Wilson, Cambridge, bricklayers.
A. G. Rahn and J. Adamson, Sunderland near the
Sea. Durham, merchants.
Charles Richards, sen., and Charles Richards, jun.,
auctioneers.

James Cuthbert Mason and Thomas Blasaon, Billing-
borough, Lincolnshire, surgeons.
Thomas Crichlow Molyneux and John Crichlow Moly-
neux, Liverpool, chain-cable-manufacturers.
Thomas Smith, Edlaston, James Smith, Ashborne, and
Joseph Smith, Derby, tobacco-manufacturers.
George Thorpe, Thomas Nicholas Lowther, and Thomas
Thorpe, St. John's-street, Clerkenwell, timber-merchants.
John Robinson and Peter Kuck, Princes-place, St.
George's East, sugar-refiners.
Hagger Lowe and Samuel Thorne, jun., Monlsham Mill
and Wharf, Chelmsford, millers.
Thomas Davis and Richard Rogers Perry, Andover,
Hampshire, surgeons.
Robert Pickard and John Andrew, Manchester, hack-
ney-coach-proprietors.
Lawrence Christian Salinow and Charles Sallnow,
Ratcliffe, surgeons.
Alexander Hunt and Jonathan Hunt, Sheffield, cutlers.
John Chappell and:John Chappell, jun., High Holborn,
hoot and shoe-makers.
Felix Yaniewiez and Willoughby Gasper Weiss, Liver-
pool, music-sellers.
Edmund Batten and:Samuel Sparks, Yeovil, Somerset-
shire, bankers.
William Dentith and Maria Heap, Manchester, druggists.
John Eyre and James Smith, Sheffield Yorkshire, mer-
chants.

William Hargrove, John Hargrove, Matthew Gawthorp,
William Gawthorp, and Henry Masterman, York, printers.
John Matchitt and George Bakewell, Derby, grocers.
John Parker and Richard Parker, Ormskirk, Lanca-
shire, carriers.

GERMAN AND BUENOS AYRES PAPERS,

ODEssA, Aran. 17.—Orders have been sent to Sebas-
topol to send 4,000 men to Poti, to reinforce the Russian
army in Asia: the Turks in Asia are said to have received
very considerable reinforcements. Admiral Greig sailed
nn the 13th to Sebastopol, whence he will put to sea with

the fleet, the destination of which is not known.
An immense magazine is to be built, on the 15th of
July, at the expence of the crown, as a depot for all the
-upplies of the army. We expect here 300 camels for the
service of the army.
CONSTANTINOPLE, APRIL 12.—Redselaid Pacha ar-
rived at Chumla on the 31st of March, and great rein-

fixcements from Bosnia, Albania, and Macedonia, are ex-
pected there. From Asia troops are continually passing
through Constantinople to the army in Bulgaria, where it
is said the Turks will scum resume the offensive. Hussein
PLclia has orders to do every thing to drive the Russians.
from Sizeboli, who have thrown up strong works
to defend this important position (in which they
have a garrison of five thousand men). The Porte
has received news from Trebizande of various ad-
vantages said to have been obtained over the Russians by
its troops, in the provinces between the Black Sea and the
Kur. The campaign in Asia was opened by the Turks,
as soon as the mild weather set in.
VIENNA, APRIL 30.—The .Austrian Observer con-
tains extracts from the Greek Bee to 24th Match, with
a kulletin, dated Salons 14th March, which gives nearly
word for word the same news that we had before of the
progress of the Greeks on the Continent. Augustin Capo
d'lstria embarked on 14th March, after addressing a pro-
clamation to the troops, to join Admiral Maulis. The
Greek Bee contains several documents relative to the
Convocation of the fourth National Assembly. —Aletalliques,
97-4; Bank Shares, 1,102.
BUENOS AYRES, FEB. I4.—A dispatch from Colonel
Isidoro Suarez, dated Palmilas, Bth February, announces
the entire defeat of the force of Molina, who himself
escaped with only 20 men. Among the prisoners was
Colonel Mesa, the second in command (who being brought
to Buenos Ayres) was tried by a court martial, and sen-
tenced to be shot for treason and rebellion, in having col-
lected the Indians to commit hostilities in the country,
&c. He was executed on the 16t'a February. The
Indians had been defeated by General Lavalle on the 21st

January.
FEB. 21.--The Peruvian Admiral Guise was killed by
a cannon ball on 24th November, at Guayaquil, during
an attack which the Peruvian squadron, under his coin-
mend, made upon that place, in which they succeeded
in destroying several ves•=els, and effected other damage.
We do not know of any better mode of making our dis-

tant readers acquainted with the occurrences ;n this coun-
try than by now and then giving extracts from the periodi-
cals of this city. In pursuance of which we extract the
following from El Tiempo of 16th inst.:—
" SANTA Fe.—We repeat that against the Government
of this ptovi;-,c; it becomes every day more urgent to em-
ploy an armed force ; not only the people of Buenos Ayres,
but tile entire republic, are aware of ti;; conduct oursued
by Lopez towards our Government,—the hostilitiets which
be is commit►ing ; therefore the employment of force is

—•-
j:...stified by his acts."
si c0ad0v.....--FE-om passengers lately arrived, it is
known that Bustos remains n, the rno3t complete inaction,
and that in Cordova itself the influence of the Gcvernment
is not felt."
1.4 t aprovince of Entre Rios there are no hostile pre-
parAtions,°anti, ai-rqrtlins to a letter we have seen, the
Governor of that province 1,74.13 I;ttle inclination to have
his " bead broke" to serve the interests of ot.4e-,.5. A
re-
port was, however, current there that Paraguay has lately
asa.;m7l a threatening tone against Buenas Ayres.
The tr0mp....76? accompanied the Governor in the late
have returned 0 F
campaign
l?res, where they are to
are-
main for fifteen or twenty days.
The '.,,visional Governor (General Lavalle) arrived in
'llfucwn:i ,w ffi
o:rreuaesdpaaiyg;7 Preparations are said to be making
, supposed nainst Santa FtC.

On Monday evening, as Mrs. CflAilfES was
proceeding to Faversham, in the dickey of cue of the stage
sn
withb ti and while hanging on, contrived
5.:9 idles, one of the description of thieves who infest the
rabasigiao;tpucnis)terikilinndent to cut one of her pockets, from
pairePutzt of silver spectacles, 7.'74h
icin a 20/. note, also
which
.si'mi cahllhgeold abstracted
I.niii box,
which he escaped. The robbery was effected between
f- oa , paunrtsiea ,
Lowioi and Pgrf°rd, .

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.

M A NSIOIsT-HOUSE.

REX v. CONSTABLE.-This was an information upon
the statute 33 Geo. IL, cap. 27, for not reporting or en-
tering the arrival of a fishing-vessel at the Nore within
three days, with the Collector of the Customs, as required
by the act. There were several other cases of a similar
kind, and much interest was excited, the penalty for a
single violation of the Act being 501., without mitigation,
and one person being liable .to punishment for the trans-
gression of another.
The several cases were to have been heard before the
LORD MAYOR; but his Lordship having been objected to,
as a trustee and subscriber to the Marine Society, Alder-
man FAREBROTHER presided.
Mr. Broderick stated, that the Legislature framed this
act in consequence of the monopoly which existed in the
London fish-market, it being the practice of the great
fishing-boat owners to keep up the price of fish at an enor-
mous height by feeding the market according to their esti-
mate of the demand of the town. A market was opened,
under the sanction of Government, in Westminster, and
when that was found to fail for want of funds, a slight
impost was levied upon fishing vessels at the Nore, and
they were compellable to report and enter within three
days at the Custom-house. Thus the public were secured
against the operation of a very gross monopoly, and made
acquainted with the prices which ought to be given for fish,
from the knowledge of the quantity brought into London.
In these cases the question was not whether the violation
of the Act was likely to be attended with injurious conse-
quence, but whether the Act was or was not transgressed.
In the 12th of Gen. 111., the charitable institution of the
Marine Society was founded, and when the Westminster
market was given up, the funds were transferred to that
society. As in a great number of cases the Act was vio-
lated, it had been thought necessary to make a public ex-
ample, and some of the most flagrant cases were accord-
ingly selected.
Upon the part of the defendants, one of whom was Mr.
Westbury, the licensed victualler of Darkhouse-lane, it
was urged that those informations had been got up merely
for the purpose of sharing in the profits of the enormous
penalties attached by an obsolete and unnecessary act of
Parliament to the practice of delaying beyond the limited
period, which practice was countenanced by the negligent
mode of collecting the trifling sum paid for entering the
vessels. It was described as being part of the system of
oppressing and harassing, which had made its appearance
so frequently against publicans and others for unconscious
offences, and against which the magistrates of the city of
London had never failed to set their faces. The strongest
ground for relying upon this backwardness to take the
evidence of common informers was to be found in the cir-
cumstance, that the public-houses in the city of London
were, with scarcely any exception, conducted in the most
reputable manner.
The ALDERMAN dismissed all the eases, the evidence
having failed in every one of them.
We understand that there are between 40 and 50 infor-
mations to be heard on the Surrey side of the water, so that
the penalties sought for are between 2,000/. and 8,000/.
The Marine Society have no concern with the forthcoming
eases.

MARLBOROUGH.STREET.
Yesterday a young man, named Edward Gibbons, who
as been in custody some days on a charge of stealing some
,rass ornaments, the property of his Grace the Duke of
Wellington, was brought before Mr. CONANT, the Magis-
trate, fur final examination, It appeared that the prisoner

was employed as a labourer at Apsley.house, in the new
improvements there going on under Mr. Benjamin Wyatt,
that he secreted several knobs of brass, which he knocked
off from some old iron rails, the tops of which this brass
ornamented, and he afterwards admitted to Mr. Fish, the
clerk of the works, that he had taken them, and showed
where they were concealed, under the grand staircase.
The prisoner said nothing in his defence, and was fully
committed for trial.

WORSHIP-STREET.
Charles "Jou•les and William Galligue, journeymen
weavers, charged on suspicion of having cut a quantity of

velvet, the property of their employer, Mr. Walters, of
Wilson-street, Finsbury, were to have been finally exa-
mined yesterday, but when the Magistrate (Mr. Baoucat-

cosi) bad taken his seat on the Bench, one of the journey-
men's Committee requested, on the part of the defendants,
that the examination might he postponed, Mr. Brutton, who
had been applied to to defend them, being unable to attend.
Mr. BROUGHTON said that the defendants, if they de-
sired it, should certainly have further time to procure legal
assistance; but he informed the applicant that Galligue
stood in a different situation to the other journeymen
whose work had been cut; for not only his own work
had been destroyed, but that of another man, named
Orange, left under the protection of his roof ; and in that
case, unless he had a good defence he would be committed,
as if he had entered into another house and destroyed the
wo: k.

The applicant intimated that he was aware of the nature
of the charge, and the case being adjourned till the end of
the week, he thanked the Magistrate and retired.
John Downes, who had been remanded, was afterwards
placed at the bar with his wife Rebecca, a quantity of
silk, the property of Messrs. Stone and Brooks, having
been destroyed in his possession.
The defendant and his wife, and an inf,nt which she
had in her arms, were remarkable for the neatness and re-
spectability of their appearance, a very unusual eireuni-
stanee in these cases.

The defendant said that on Tuesday night he had been
to a shop-meeting, after which he returned home to bed,
and between one and two in the morning several men
came to his place, gained admittance by stratagem, and cut
his work ; having pushed him into his room and confined
him there while they did it.
The defendant, it appeared, had given an alarm after the
work was destroyed, and afterwards gave a very circum-
stantial account of the transaction to Mr. Hopley, the fore-
man of his employers.
Mr. TWYFORD-Have you any thing besides your own
assertion to show me that the work was destroyed in the
manner you say? Did you make any resistance? Defendant
I believed my life in danger. I was so alarmed that I could
hardly stand.
Mr. Tivvroan—Who was in the house besides yourself!
Defendant—My wife.
At a late period of the slay a witness named George An-
drews was produced, and in a manner which had every ap-
pearance of sincerity, stated, that he from his window had
observed the proceedings of five men in Globe-fields, two of
whom stood at the end of the court in which Dowries
lived, while three of them entered the court, and went to-
wards his house. There was no passage through the court,
and the witness had no doubt that the work was cut by
those men.

Mr. TWYFORD observed, that this was the first case in
which there had been credible evidence produced in support
of the assertions of the defendants; but the evidence here
was very much in favour of the defendant, whom he ac-
cordingly discharged.
James Cordell and Thomas Short, two young men
who worked and slept together, were placed at the bar to
account for the destruction of two looms of silk, worth 331.,

the property of Messrs. Tarrant and Co., of Steward-
street, Spitalfields.
The cutting took place on Wednesday morning, although
the defendants were not placed at the liar to answer for it
till yesterday.
- - - -

Thomas Banks, Messrs. Tarrant arid Co.'s foreman,
stated, that about half past five on Wednesday morning
Cordell came to him and said, that the work had been de-
stroyed by four or five men, who forced in the door, and
threatened that if he (lid not lie quiet in bed, and cover his
head over, they would " cut him." The defendant told
hint that he begged of the men not to cut his work, and
said that lie was surprised they should cut it, as he was
satisfied with the price he received. The witness went to
the house about seven o'clock, and saw a woman standing
there with a plate to receive money.from those who entered
to rook at the cut-work. There were a great many people,
men and women, most of whom gave something when they
entered.
Cordell, in his defence, said that about two in the morn.
jog he heard somebody at the door, and asked who was
there? and was told " a friend." He replied, that he
would not open the door for say body ; and was answered,
if he did not they would break it open ; and the door wa/r
forced open. Four or five men entered, and asked hire
who he worked for? He said for Mr. Tarrant, of Steward-
stree;, pd begged of them not to cut his work. They
told him if he did not lie still and cover his head, they
would cut him. He and his companions were then c"!nf
relied to cover themselves over with the bed-clothes, while
the men cut their work.
The defendant Short said that what Cordell had said
was true. _

Being questioned by the Magistrate as to whether they
alarmed their neighbours, or sought the assistance of the
the defendants said that when the men had left
then tliey went out, and told their neighbours, and a
watchman al4o,
what occurred, but not to any
police-officer.
Mr. Garton, the chief constable, said, that to his know-
ledge there were a great number of officers constantly
moving about the neighbourhood in which the defendants
lived ; but if these parties of cutters were going about,
they were never to be suet with, although the work was
frequently cut; . ;
---t were under the very none of the

officers. But the men, when aNked who these cutters
were, or bow they went about to avoid being seen, laughed
at the officers, and said that the cutters were angels.
The defendants, after a lengthened examination, were
remanded for a week, to give time for further inquiries,
recognizances being taken for their appearance at that time.