The Sun.
London, England, 1842-03-05 00:00:00

ALGERIA.

Mr. SIIIEL postponed to Thi'rsday, the motion of
which he had given notice, relative to the production
of the communications between the Earl of Aberdeen
and the French Ambassador, on the subject of the French
occupation of Algiers.
PORTENDIC.

Mr. SMYTHE wished to ask the Right Hon. Baronet
at the head _of the Government, if he was prepared to
state to the House the progress which had been made in
the negotiations with the French Government, for the
purpose of obtaining for certain British subjects com-
pensation for the losses they had suffered in consequence
of the conduct of the French authorities at Portendic.
Sir ROBERT PEEL begged to state, that
some time since, as long ago he believed as
April, 1840, a Commission had been appointed
consistinc, of Commissioners appinted by the Govern-
ment of both countries, for the purpose of inquiring
into the merits of the respective claimants. The sit-
tings of that Commission had been interrupted from va7
rious circumstances, but very recently the English Com-
missioner had returned to Paris, and the Commission
bad resumed its sittings, which he. had every reason to
believe would soon be brought to a satisfactory termi-
nation. Should anything, however, occur to frustrate
the hopes which he entertained on the subject, he would
take an early opportunity of giving the House informa-
Eon on the subject.
CORN-LAWS.

Mr. 'M. GIBSON begged to ask the !Right Hon.
Baroeet opposite whether he was aware of any commu-
nications on the part of certain dignitaries and clergy-
men of the Established Church, having taken place with
any member of her Majesty's Government relative to the
new system of taking the corn averages, and the effect it
may have upon the title rent charged, and also, whether
they would adhere to the proposed system of taking them.
Sir R. PEEL said that of course he r,-ceived nume-
rous letters every day upon the subject of the Corn-
laws, but he was not aware that he received any such
formal communications as the Hon. Gentleman had al-
luded to.

Lord JOHN RUSSELL said that: he wished to ask
a question of the Right Hon. Gentleman, the Vice-Pre-
sident of the Board of TradeHwe.ihthatfehsepaect to the new towns
for taking the averages.
,arrlcdetthat in particular
leftni out
counties. towns, which had corn m
of the new list and others put in. lie dilviell:)et
Bay that any partiality in selecting certain towns tte,aaaniitt°
tended, but lip wished to know if any a statement could
be made respecting the change of particular towns, and
Whf Others had been selected.
Sir ROBERT PEEL said that he would answer the
Woble Lord after he had brought in the Corn Importation
Bill. The Right lion. Gentleman then brought in the
Bill, which was read a first time.
Sir 11:f PEEL said that he would take that opportu-
nity to answer the question of the Noble Lord. The
Bill was drawn up in conformity with
with h
theit resolutionst
R was drawn up in general conformity v
expla-
nation he gave on the part of her Majesty's Govern-
iment, on moving for leave to bring in the Bill. There
were one or two pints :on which he wished to make a
statement to the House. The first was with respect to
the inspectors. He received communications from
them, and from persons interested on their behalf,
with respect to the hardship of removing them,
and that their removal would give grounds for claims to
compensation which he wishd to avoid. He proposed
that the averages. in the new towns should" be taken by
the Excise officers, and placed under the Board of Ex-

cise ; but with respect to the towns that were not
entered, he proposed that the present inspectors should
be continued, as they were - perfectly efficient ; and
that they should be placed under the Board of Trade.
He (Sir R. Peel) proposed to give the Treasury, acting in
concurrence with the Board of . Trade, the power of
granting superannuated Salaries. to those inspectors who
may be removed from office, and who, for a . length of
service, and propriety of conduct._ in the discharge of
their duties might be entitled to retiring allowances.
The whole-duty would be performed-by-the Excise, with-
out any, or scafcely any additional expense to the public.
With regard to the period when it was proposed that
the Bill should come into operation, as it was intended
to give an immediate remission of duty, it appeared to him
(Sir R. Peel) that it would be desirable that as soon as
the Bill obtained the assent of the Legislature, that it
should come into operation as soon as possible, he would
like to permit the duties substituted by the Bill, for the
existing duties to be in operation as soon iis
possible ; the Bill, therefore, on its passing, would
come into operation immediately.--(Hear.) With re-
spect to the other question put by the Noble Loid
his (Sir R. Peens) object was, as he had already stated,
that the places from which the returns should be taken
should be as extensive as possible, with a view in the first
instance to obtain more accurate informaticin
of the quantity of corn sold, and the prices
of those different towns. But in taking those
averages in these towns, he had no wish whatevqr
to add these towns for the purpose of diminishing the
price of corn, and raising the duty. The Noble Lors.d
asked upon what principle those towns were selected'?
He (Sir R. Peel) found it was exceedingly difficult tlo
ascertain what was the relative importations of those towo,
or what was the quantity of corn sold in them, but tlle
revision of the list of towns was conducted upon thi,
prinelple, which appeared to him to be a fair ono. At
present there were about 150 or 151 towns in which tla.
averages were taken by means of inspectors ; of coal+
there was a certain number of towns on that liSt
which bore a relative proportion to the agri-
cultural, manufacturing, and commercial towns. '
In the selection of the towns connected with the runil
and agricultural districts, lie had attempted to maintain
the same ratio in tho new. towns, with respe4t
to the proportion of agricultural to manufac-
turire', towns, as was observed in the existing
list. That was the general principle on which he hail
attempted to proceed. The Noble Lord would have an
opportunity of seeing the list, and if it could be shown
that there were towns, with respect to which Gentlemen
were in the possession of information which he had not
bad the means of procuring ; and if it should be found
that some errors existed, he could only state that he had
takea all the means in his power to collect a list
of those towns which were most important for this pur-
pose. If any errors should be found, those errors would
be a fit subject for discussion. He must, of course, nece4-
aarily submit himself to the pleasure of the House, ut after
the sense of the House had been marked on the que4-
tion, he should proceed with the measure as ra-
pidly as was consistent with a due deliberation
of the details and principle of the Bill. He proposed,
therefore, to fix Monday next for proceeding with
it, and if on Monday other business should prevent its
due consideration, he should not bring it on at any
hour which would be unsuitable to the discussion.
If the sense of the House should be decidedly in favour
of the improvement of the existing laws, he should do
all in his power to bring the Bill into as early operation
as possible, without at the same time pressing it unduly
against the sense of those who might wish to take
part in the discussion. With the understandieg then
that on Monday next, if the business of supply should
occupy the House to an inconvenient hour, he should
take the earliest opportunity afterwards for the second
reading.
Mr. COBDEN claimed the indulgence of the House
in a matter personal to himself. It would be in the re.-
collection of the House that, a week ago, an Hon. Member
had stated some facts personally relating to him ; it was
stated that while he was complaining of the operation of
the Corn •laws, he was working his mills night and day,
by which cruel means he had amassed a large fortune.
The facts not being then within his knowledge, he
did not think proper to answer this statement ; but
he had since written into the country for information to
enable him to meet the charge, and he might first mention
that 'the concern in which he was interested, employed
600 people, and during the last 18 months it had been
employing by night ten men, from the 31st of July to
the 4th of September. During that interval they
had employed ten men by night, in casual
work of finishing and dressing. Now, the charge of
cruelty to himself must necessarily mean that the same
hands were employed. He would, therefore, be allowed
by the House to explain that they had furnished
work by night to hands who were out of work
and who would have had nothing else to do, if they
had not employed them. He read an extract of a let-
ter that he had received on the subject, stating
that they " only wished they could employ 500 extra
hands, for if they wanted 5,000 they could get as many
very glad to get • work, for the men had never
been so badly off." Now he might mention, with re-
gard to the cotton printing business, as the House did not
seem to have a very clear knowledge of the distinction be-
tween a cotton mill and a print work, that cotton printing
was something like paper printing,—it had its seasons,
and to prevent a cotton printer from occasionally employ-
ing half a score men at night, in particular seasons, would
be like interdicting the printingof magazines, which were
required once a month, as of newspapers, or any other
kind of publications.—(Hear, hear.) He mentioned this
in order that Hon. Gentlemen might know that there
was a distinction between a cotton printing work and a
spinning mill. He hoped that the two had
not been confounded, from a desire of fixing upon him
that peculiar odium which seemed to be attached to the
cotton mill. Between a Cotton mill and a printing
mill, there was, in fact, no more analogy, than between
a cotton mill and that House. He (Mr. Cobden) had
not an atom of mill-work belonging to his establish-
ment. The Hon. Gentleman opposite had made a
sweeping charge against the Anti-Corn-law League,
stating that the manufacturers who belonged to that
body paid their wages upon the truck system. Now
that, as a violation of the law, or at best, an evasion of
the law, was a very seriouscharge ; and as he was proud
to avow himself a very conspicious member of the
Anti-Corn-law League, he hoped he might be allowed
to state, as far as he was acquainted with the case,
how far that charge was deserved.—(Hear, hear.)
b' Of course you are aware„" said the letter
which he had received that morning, "that our
wages are paid every Saturday morning, and our
rule is that every person in the works shall
be paid by eight o'clock in the morning, so that
they can lay out their money to the best ad-
vantage when and where they pleased."—(Cheers.)
Now nothing could possibly be more futile than for a
person like himself to stand up there and-to disclaim the
truck system, if be practised it ; for he assured them that
the shopkeepers in the neighbourhood of any large
establishment were exceedingly jealous, and very acute
in perceiving who were the parties that paid money and
who were not. He therefore begged to say, in answer
to the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite, that he had
paid 20,0001. a year foi wages for the last ten
years, and that lie had never either directly or indirectly
been concerned in keeping any shop about the establish-
ment ; every farthing had been paid in money.—
(Loud cheers.) That fact was notorious to every
one in the neighbourhood of the , establishment to
which he belonged.—(Hear.) And now he must be al-
lowed to state, in answer to the Hon. Gentleman oppo
site, that when he made that charge so broadly,
without excepting himself, he was aware at the time, for
an II onourale Gentleman opposed to him in
politics, who lived near to his establishment, had told
him, that as far as he (Mr. Cobden) was concerned, that
charge was not true ; and he called upon the Hon.
Member for Wigan, though an opponent in politics,
to state whether every word which he now uttered
was not the truth—(Hear, hear, hear)—and now, as
he had said a week ago, he repeated that he consi-
dered this to be a very undignified occupation,
for them ; and he might be allowed to state, that in fu-
ture he hoped he should not be expected to come forth
and occupy the time of the House in refuting charges
of that kind from the same quarter.—(Hear,)
If any Hon. Gentleman should condescend to take the
slightest interest in his personal character, he would
refer him to his neighbours and to his work-
people ; he would refer him directly to them,
and if any Honourable Gentleman in , that
House, or out of it, should take upon himself to
speak as to his character, he only wished him to carry
out towards him the golden. rule, of " doing unto
others as they would have others do unto them,"
by first making inquiries as to his character in his own
neighbourhood.—(Cheers.) Now, before sitting down,
he might be allowed to state that an Hon. Gentleman in
that House had been entrusted with a number of
declarations from a large body of individuals in Lanca-
shire, who had requested him to lay before that House a
distinct denial of the charges so broadly made against the
members of the Anti-Corn-law League.—(Hear.)
Mr. VILLIERS wished to make a few observations,
as he was entrusted with a statement from several manu-
facturers, members of the Anti-Corn-law League. The
House would remember the circumstances under which the
charge was made against the manufacturers, by the
Hon. Member for Knaresborough. He made
certain charges against the manufacturers gene-
rally, and afterwards he qualified those charges
by stating that he meant them to apply to the manufac-
turers of England, members of the Corn-law League.
The nature of those charges had become • matter
of notoriety. Those charges were of a most serious
character. It was right that those charges should
be sifted to the bottom ; and as he had a state-
ment, utterly denying the whole of those charges,
on the 'behalf of a great number of manufacturers,
members of the Corn-law League, he felt bound shortly
to bring them before the House.—(Hear, hear.) The
charge made by the lion. Member for Knaresborough
was that the manufacturers in his neighbourhood could
not compete with the Anti-Corn-law League manufac-
turers, because it was their practice to pay
their men in goods and not in money.
It was true that money was given them, but the whole
of that money was taken from them by the
servants of those for whom they. worked for
the payment of clothing and the necessaries of life. He
also said, that it was ccnotorious fact that the master
manufacturers cleared 25 per cent. upon goods
that they sold to their workmen. Now, that
statement having been submitted to a great
number of master manufacturers connected with the
League, they had in a deliberate manner drawn
up a formal denial, in which they repudiated the whole
of the charges contained in the speech of the Hon. Mem-
ber for Knaresborough, as far as they were concerned.
They stated that they were utterly destitute of truth ;
that they kept no truck shops;_ and that they paid their
workmen in no other way .than in the current coin
of the realm. This 'aeclaration was signed by a great
number of the principal manufacturers of the Anti-
Corn-law League. 'He thought after this that the House

would feel satisfied that the Hon. Gentleman opposite
ought to enter into some explanation on the subject.
Mr. FERRAND would first reply to the Hon. Mem-
ber for Stockport. He did not charge him with cruelty
to his workmen.—(Cries of " Oh, oh.") As far as he re-
collected, he said, that the Hon. Member for Stockport
had worked his mills both day and night. He never
used such an expression as abominable cruelty.—
(Cries, of " Oh, oh.") The Honourable Member
had said that he (Mr. Ferrand) had charged him with
adopting the truck system. He could assure the House
that he had never done so. If it had been
his intention so to have done, he should
have plainly told him so in his presence.
It was true that the Hon. Member, to whom reference had
been made, had told him that the Hon. Member for Stock-
port had not been guilty of adopting the truck sys-
tem, but paid his men in money.—(Hear, hear.)
.He hoped he had now stated sufficient to satisfy
the House, and the Honourable Member for Stockport
in that respect. With regard to what had fallen
from the Honourable Member for Wolverhampton,
he was prepared to prove by credible witnesses
that a great number of members of the Anti-Corn-
law League had paid their workmen wages in goods.
He did not say all —( Hear.) He nevar used the word "all "
at all—( Cheers and laughter)---and he again asserted that he
was prepared to prove, on tke twits of clergymen, of gentlemen
of the highest respectability and station, of manufacturers, of
tradespeople, of working people, who had given him their
names since he had brought the question before a Com-
mittee of that House, every assertion that he had made
the other evening on the subject—(Cheer:)—and there
was an Hon. Member on the other side the House who
said that he was prepared to prove every word that he (Mr.
Ferranti) had said, and ten times more.
Mr. VILLIERS said that the Hon.' Gentleman had said

that the explanation was only a 'miserable quibb'e. He (Mr.
Villiers) contended that the floe. Gentleman did charge all
the Members of the Anti-Cern-law League.—(Cries of
" Order," " order," " chair," " chair.")

The CHANCELLOR of EXCHEQUER rose to order.

When any Hon. Member disclaimed having uttered any words
which were imputed to him by another Hon. Member, it was
decidedly out of order for a Hon. Member to get up, as the
Hon. Member for Wolverhampton had done, and declare that
the Hon. Member had uttered the words he disclaimed. Such
a mode of proceeding was not at all in accordance with the
usage of Parliament.
Mr. VILLIERS again rose, but was met by loud cries of
" Chair, chair," " Order, order," in the midst of which the
Hon. Member resumed his seat.
Mr. LA BOUCHERE rose to order. He did not under-
stand his Hon. Friend to say that the Hon. Gentleman had
charged all the manufacturers.—( Cries of " Yes, yes," and
" Order, order.) He understood his Hon. Friend to say that
the Hon. Member for Knaresborough had said that the bulk
of the members of the Anti-Corn-law League were in the
habit of paying their woi,kmen their wages on the truck system.
Mr. VILLIERS again rose, but was again met by loud
cries of " Order, order." He hoped the House would allow
him to explain what had taken place. He had made a
mis-
take, and had apprehended that the Hon. Member for Knares-
borough had charged all the manufacturers in the manner al-
luded to ; and he (Mr. Villiers) had so stated in his reply. He
was met by cries:of "No, no," and he (Mr. Villiers) then said
the Hon. Gentleman then limits his charge to the manufac-
turers constituting the Association called the Anti-Corn-law
League. The Hon. Member for Knaresborough touched his
hat, and said "Decidedly." He ( Mr. Villiers) did not say
that the Hon. Gen leman said the word " all," but he had in-
cluded in his charge every member connected with the Anti-
Corn-law League.—( Cheers, and cries of Order, order.")
The SPEAKER said that after an Hon. Member had given
a positive denial of words imputed to him, it was decidedly out
of order in any Hon. Member to contend, atter such a dis-
claimer, that the Hon. Member had made such a statement.

Mr. VILLIERS was willing to say that he had misappre-
hended the Hon. Member, and was ready to receive his ex-
planation, which be understood to be, that he did not intend
to allude to all the members of the Anti-Corn-law League, but
only to some individuals of that body.—(Loud cheers from the
Opposition.)
Sir B. HALL wished to ask a question of the Hon. Member
for Salford and the Hon. Member for Knaresborough. The
Hon. Member for Salford had given notice of a motion fer
Tuesday next on the subject of the truck system, for returns
of the districts in which the truck system was pursued by ma-
nufacturers in paying the wages of their workmen ; and the
Hon. Member for K naresborough had given notice for an
amendment, extending the motion to other parts of the coun-
try, particularly to the mining districts. He wished to know
whether the Hon. Gentleman wished, if the motion was
granted, or if the returns could not be made out, to call the at-
tention of the House to the necessity of legislating on the sub-
ject. There were some parts of the kingdom in which the
system prevailed to a great extent. After the statements which
had been made to the House, it was impossible for them to allow
the matter to rest, and he thought the most efficient way of
putting a stop to the system would be by making. public all the
information which could be obtained regarding it. He consi-
dered that a more effectual way of putting a stop to it than the
introduction of a legislative enactment.
Mr. BROTHERTON said that the motion of which he had
given notice related to cotton, silk, woollen, or flax mills;
and he had so worded his motion, because by an Act of Par-
liament inspectors were appointed who could furnish the in-
formation in question. He had not asked for returns relative
to printed works, or to iron and coal works, because these did
not come within the province of the Inspectors of Factories, and
he did not see how these returns could be obtained. His
object was to ascertain the extent of the truck system, but not
from any belief that that system was practised in cotton or
other mills. The Right HOn. Gentleman opposite ( Mr.
Ferrand) might move for separate returns, according to the
terms of his notice, if he thought proper to do so; but his
(Mr. Brotherton's) motion motion might be defeated if the
Hon. Gentleman coupled his notice with it, inasmuch as the
information relative to printed works could not be obtained
through the Factory Inspectors.
Lord J. RUSSELL wished to observe before the subject
was dropped, that he thought it of the utmost importance that
the House should agree as to the manner in which the accusa-
tions brought by the Hon. Member opposite (Mr. Ferrand
should be investigated.--(Hear, hear. ), ,certainly had
not understood the Honourable Gentlemen:. to have
brought forward allegations against the manufacturers generally;
but he had understood that the accusation was made with the
explanation that though it did not apply to all the manufac-
turers of England, it applied to those manufacturers only who
were' connected with the Anti-Corn-law League.—(Loud
cries of "Hear, hear," cn the Opposition benches, in the
midst of which we understood Mr. Ferrand to adopt, by nod-
ding his assent, the interpretation of the Noble Lord.) Cer-
tainly the impression with which he (Lord J. Russell) had
gone away, although the exact words were not used was that
the great bulk, the great majority of the manufacturers be-
longing to the Corn. law League were guilty in the first place
of fraudulent practices with regard to their manufactures ;
and, secondly, that they cheated their workmen by selling
their goods which were worth 25 per cent. less than they
charged. •It would appear, if he understood rightly the Hon.
Gentleman's explanation, that what he meant was only that
some of the manufacturers belonging to the Anti-Corn-law
League had been guilty of the practices, and that to that extent,
he was ready to prove his charge. That was not certainly any
contradiction cf what had been read by the Hon. Member for
Salford. There might, no doubt, be manufacturers belonging
to the Anti-Corn law League guilty of such practices, and
there might also be manufacturers very much in favour of the
Corn-laws, who had been guilty of similar practices.—
( Hear, hear, and a laugh.) There might be charges
quite as serious brought against many farmers—they might
find out cases of farmers who paid their workmen the
scantiest wages, and who acted very oppressively in their
mode of paying those wages. But what was to be avoided as
much as possible was that charges of this kind should
,he
brought in such a manner as—to proiuce an impression that
the great body of our countrymen engaged, whether in ma-
nufactures or in agriculture, were guilty of these fraudulent
practices.-Loud cries of " Hear, hear," from the Opposition
benches.)e much regretted that the Hon. Gentleman, if
he meant to make an accusation so limited and so confined,
did not express himself in such a manner as not to be mis-
understood; and the more so, because those who listened
to him came to such rapid and instantaneous conclusions
against all the manufacturers.—(Cheers, and cries of " No,
no." from Mr. Ferrand). If the Hon. Gentleman had any
further explanation to give, or meant to bring forward those
charges again, he believed there was no doubt of his having an
opportuity of doing so.—(Hear, hear.) He must say that
for his part he heard with pain the speech of the
lion. Gentleman, and he must say likewise that he had seen
with great pain charges made in many of the speeches, not of
persons in that House, but of persons ecnnected with the Anti,
Corn-law League, against those who maintained the present
Corn-laws, as if those persons had been animated by a desire
to ruin and destroy the great increase of the manufactures.—
( Heir, hear.) There may have been a bias on both sides,
and personal interests might have influenced both parties, but
that there was any part of their fellow-countrymen so sordid
and wedded to their own interests as for these reasons to main-
tain the Corn-laws ; or that there was any party which, for the
same reasons wish to alter them, he (Lord J. Russell) did not
believe ; he thought the charges unfounded in themselves, and
that they ought not to be made.—(Loud and long cheering.)
With respect to the motion of the Right Hon. Gentleman
he must say, from several communications he had wi.h other
gentlemen, it was their intention to take a debate on the prin-
ciple of the measure, as to whether it was a good settlement
of the question as regarded the Corn-laws or not. That being
the case, if the question is brought forward on Monday next,
it was the intention of his (the Opposition) side of the House
to take a debate, and divide on the question; because, if it
came after the estimates, it was impossible it would have any
effect. He thought it right to let them know that it was their
intention to take the sense of the House on the subject.
Mr. FERRAND said, he wished to state that he had as-
serted that frauds had been carried on by the manufacturers to
a great and frightful extent, and that the truck system was
also adopted to an alarming extent, and was increasing daily
to an amount that, as far as the poor were concerned, God
only knew.---( Cries of " Oh, oh.")
Mr. VILLIERS said, that he wished to make a few obser-
vations on a slight difference in the speech of the Right Hon.
cGoenntrtlear ton the
otbanedru he
lesbeogrgteh(alt that ho
to mightread onebe l
line.—(
n allowed,e_ ( t
Order.oug
waThoeutStl;l...lrAdKern(Rndinctoiumldatneedtt;rteeelr. Gentleman that he
or the Right Hon. Gentleman, the Vice-President Mr. M. PHILLIPS wished to ask the Right Hon. Baronet,
practicesade of thiswhi
circumstanceewhich
countryhofad
made with reference to the foreign cotat:retrraade statement
dent of Board
of Trade, whether they were prepared to
d
t he takenha
particularp al
aacffeeritemndwodt kes,
foreignstat
consequencee d thatma market,
kh
of
ft foreign
certainfro
from the t r
in which cotton goods had been prepared.—(A laugh.)
Sir R. PEEL could not form any opinion upon Me sub-
ject. He did not see, since his appointment to office, any
representations of the description alluded to by the Hon.
Member

FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
Lord J. RUSSELL wished to ask the Right Hon. Baronet
at whit time he would be prepared to make his financial state-
ment.
Sir R. PEEL, in answer to the question which the Noble
Lord had put, stated that the motive that existed for bringing
forward the second readinc, of the Bill for the Importation of
Corn, was solely with reference to public interest. He ( Sir
IL Peel) would then state the course which he should be de_
sirous of pursuing, but that must depend entirely upon the
will and pleasure of the House; he received daily communica-
tion urging the great necessity of a speedy adjustment of that
question, but he wished to take the earliest opportunity to
explain the views of her Majesty's Government with respect to
the financial and commercial policy of the country ; he felt the
necessity of that most forcibly—( Hear, hear.) To night he
proposed to introduce the estimates of the Army and Navy in
Committee. The House would be fully occupied with those
several questions until Wednesday the 23i1 Alarch. Good
Friday would be the 25th March, when of course the House
would adjourn according to usual custom for some period.
Consequently on Thursday the 24th, there would be an inter-
ruption for some time, however short, to the progress of business.
sSuuephpopserogthreessesitnimcoaternsmofitttheee
asArmwoyualndd
jNusatvifyy shhoiumldihan vemade
oniitteybteothy 'financial
n thisan
dayial
explain-
ing to the House the views and opinions of her Majesty's
e
fnGoornte:beerwndiffitihseponr
etsfeedwreti tonhc postpone
e?'
nesPeett
public interest, he would be anxious that there should- be as
powleieekv:
and
sthhofiureld.
personal convenience, but to