The Sun.
London, England, 1842-06-18 00:00:00

that the labouring population of the south were beguiled?
Would they express their sorrow for lending themselves to the
system of kidnapping the poor from the south to the north ?
Where, he would ask the Right lion. Baronet, were the poor
who had already been passed to the north ? Could he
render any account of them to the poor relations immured in
the bastiles in the south ? if he could not render an account
of 1N hat had become of these poor the people of England would
not submit to this measure much longer. The laws of God
had been trampled on, and His word scoffed at by the New
Poor-law, which denied the authority of the Bible. From the
moment the Poor-law had become the law of the land the
trade of the districts to which these wretches had been passed
had deca)ed daily. These wretches hrd been passed from the
sough of England, not for their own lonefit, but to save the
pockets of th-e rate payers. Saving of rates was the burden of
the song of the Poor-law Commissioners. When the law wit,
first brought forward it was declared by Lord Brougham that there
was no intention to carry it out in an oppressive manner,
and that it was not intended to separate man and wife, or
parent and child. He (Mr. Ferrand) knew that these oppa,ed
to the law felt as sirt.ingly as he did on the uhject. Ile would
ask the Right Hon. karonet, it the Commissioners had been
able to carry the law into force in the north ? They had not.
They could not. The mass of the population would prevent it.
In his own union ii had been attempted to be carried out in
the most monstrous and unjustifiable manner. It was a large
manufacturing district in a state of deep distress, and yet the
Poor-law Commissioners, in order to carry out their absurd
ideas, had prohibited out-door relief. If the Guardians t-
tempted to carry out that order, a worse state of ruin would in-
stantly ensue. They would have to summon the poor by thou-
sands for nun-payment of rates, and incarcerate them in the
county gaols, which would have to be made larger. They de-
ducted from the relief granted by the Board of Guardians to
the paupers the amount due from them for summonses for non-
payment of poor-rates. Was it not monstrous that persons of
70 or 80, or 90 years of age, shoulei be torn from their
homes and placed in a union workhouse, at the will
of these three Commissioners. How would the Right
Honourabte Baronet carry the Poor-law out? In his
(Mr. Ferranti's) neighbourhood, the relieving officer was obliged
to go about the country escorted by a troop of cavalry. The
men of the north had always done their duty by the poor—they
challenged any man to produce an instance of their having be.
hayed ill to the poor whilst they were permitted to have the
management of their own affairs—and all they asked was to be
permitted to continue as they had hitherto gone on. It was not
twelve months since they had all appeared on the hustings before
their constituents. At that election how many of them had
expressed their utter detestation of the new Poor-law, and
pledged themselves to resist it to the uttermost. —( Opeosii ion
cheers.) Were they determined to stand true to their prin-
ciples and professions. The electors of England were easily I
satisfied. f they performed one twentieth part of what they
had promised, the Bill would not be carried.—(Cheers.) lie
saw the Hon. Member for Montrose shake his head. He hoped
that those who were opposed to the new Poor-law were not di, •
posed to vote that black was white. He trusted they would not.
desert their pledges ; if they remained true to them this till
would no longer disgrace the Statute-hook of England. The
poor would be properly treated, and not be delivered over to the
tyrants ofe•omerset House.

If the motion were likely to lead to debate, he would with.
draw it.

On an intimation from Sir R. PEEL, we understood that the
motion was withdrawn.
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE.
In answer io a question from Captain PEC HELL,
.Sir ROBERT PEEL said that the public business would
commence at Half-past Four on Monday.
The House then adjourned at a Quarter to One o'Clock.

. .
Sir J. GRAHAM said that the Hon. Gentleman who hail
just sat down had asked if any Member would, after the state-
. ments he had made, venture to press the second reading of the
Bill upon the attention of the House? Notwithstanding that.
challenge, he (Sir J. Graham) was preparsd to press the se-
cond reading of the Bill. With respect to the observations of
the Hon. Member, in which he alluded with a sneer to the
benevolence of Dr. Kay, he (Sir J. Graham) must say that a
more ti my charitable and accomplished gentleman, and one
more fitted to discharge his duties than Dr. Kay, he had never
Isianro. As to what had been stated about the power of the
Poor-law Commissioners, and their mode of using it in issuing
prohibitory orders, he must say, that if he wished for any test
by which to try the discretion of those functionaries, he would
take the manlier in which they issued those prohibitory orders,
and abstained from them as the case seemed to require. The
Right lion Barouet here proceeded to quote at considerable
iength the Report. of Mr. Mott, showing the mismanagement
that had characterized the mode of giving relief to the poor,
and the neceS4ty of applying a remedy, and then went on ts,
show the jobs which had been committed under the sanction
of the Guardians in various Unions, and particularly in the
Union of Keightley, where, according to a resolution in the
minute-book of the Guardians, the trials of settlement cares
were to be given in rotation to the attorneys of the town.
The consequence was that the law expenses for the last yi ar
in that union were upwards of 5001. He had not in-
tei ded to rise on the present occasion, but having heard so
unjust an attack upon Dr. Kay, as the Hon. Member for Knares-
borough had made, he could not sit by wit bout rising in
defence of that gentleman's character. But to return to the
subject before the House, who were the lion. Members that
proposed and seconded the rejection of the Bill ? One was an
Irish Gent. eman (Mr. S. Crawford), who could not have set-is
the working of the measure, and who being Member for the
oniy large town in England (Rochdale) which was not under
the operation of the Poor-law, could not be practically conver-
sant with it. The other gentleman was the Horn and Gallant
Mem her for Brighton (Captain Pechell), which was under the
operation of a local act. On the o her hand those were the
most ardent supporters of the law, who were connected with
places where it was in full operation. The real question now
was, whether the Commission was to be continued, or not; for
the other parts of the Bill were mitigations of the existing
law.—( hear, hear, hear.) When lion. Gentlemen proposed
a substitution for the Commission, the substitute they siig. '
Bested was something very like what they would
do away with. The Honourable Member for Rosh-
dale proposed an ambulatory Commission, which was
the existing Commission without the name, and the Hon Member for ;Macclesfield proposed district Commissioners.—
( Hear, hear.) There were four reasons on which he justified ;
the continuance clam Commision. The first was that relief
was given gradually and safely; the second, that what was
found to be injurious in one union might be remedied by them
in the different unions throughbut the country ; the third
reason was, that. if anything illegal was done, relief might be
had from the Supreme Courts of law ; and the fourth, and
strongest reason was, that recourse should be had to the local ;
Alagistrates, which would let in all the abuses of the old s)s-
tem, of which an illustration was afforded by the recent pro-
eeedings in the Keightley Union. He had troubled the House
at greater lerigth than he intended, but after the calmest and ;
fullest consideration of the subject he came to the conclusion
that the original enactment was right in the main, d believing
it to be right- he was regardless of the censures that might be
passed on him and on his motives ; but he did not. think he
would be doing his duty if he did not urge upon the House the
second reading of the Bill.—(Cheers.)
Mr. FE.R RAND, in explanation said, that he pledged him-
self that the report of the Assistant-Commissioner with regard
to the Ktrightley Union was false.
Mr. S. WORTLEY did not think it necessary to detain
the House for any length of time, and for this reason, that the
main point was whether the Commission was to be continued.
He was determined to maintain the opinions he expressed upon
the hustings, and he would be belying his convictions if he be-
lieved the night Hon. Gentleman, or the Commissioners, or
Assistant-Commissioners, were what they were sometimes re-
presented to be—demons and tyrants.—(Laughter.) He eel -
tainly differed will them in opinion upon the subject of the
Poor-law, but with regard to the continuance of the Commis-
sion, he held it to be impracticable and impossible to remove
the central Commission at present, and if he voted for the se-
cond reading he did so in an abstract sense. But that did not
prevent him: from evincing a general hostility to the Bill.
He, therefore, supported the continuance of the Commission only
while a necessity for it existed ; but they should not forget the
g '
rouro's of its institution, and that it was established only for
specific. purposes. He should not, therefore, be considered as
supporting the Commission as a permanent institution, lint
only so long as the exigency for working out the purposes in
which it originated existed. With regard to the Bill before
the House, he admitted there were improvements on the existing
law ; and one very considerable improvement was the afford-
ing temporary relief to families under certain circumstances.

. -
These were, however, but matters of deta►l. The principal
question before them ,vas, whether it was a ivisable to agree to
the second reading of the Bill, taking it as a whole. Of the
powers of the Commissioners he could not app►ove ; and
he could not but express at the same time his dis-

approbation of the manner in which those gentle-
men had constructed the unions. Many of the unions
were too large; and this had been found to be a source of

great inconvenience. lie earnestly wished that the House,
taking into account the inapplicability of the measure, would
le-consider the whole question. He thought that they should
take into consideraf on the propriety of intrusting the execution
of the Poor-law to the local authorities. The principle of ,elf-
government was one of the most valuable principles of the
social condition of England. 'I hey might, under the authority
of the Commissioners, gain greater uniformity in the adminis-
tration of the Poor. law ; but that advantage would, in his
opinion, be too dearly purchased by the loss of those habits o
self-government which had become familiar to the people of
this country. He did not say that they should at
once get rid of the new system • but he thought they should
endeavour gradually to return to ;he old principle of entrusting
the administration of poor-rates to those who, by their posi-
tion, were best acquainted with the wants of the poor.
Colonel W COD (Brecon) was one of those who would wish
to see the Bill divided into two parts. He would be glad to
find the Government propose that the authority of the Com-
missioners should be continued for a limited time; and he
thought they should afterwards consider, in the next session
of Parliament, the propriety of introducing many alterations
into the present system. lie disapproved of the principle of
making the casual poor chargeable to all the unions, instead
. . .

ot making them chargeable to the parish in which they were

living. - - _ .
Mr. LIDDEL thought that the House should not at once
put an end to the authority of the Ccmnnssioners. He thought
such a proceeding would be impolitic ; but, at the same time,
he could not vote for so long a duration of the Commission as

had been proposed by the Government. He should not, how-
ever, vote against the second reading of the Bill, as he believed
it might be materially improved in Committee. The principle
that the workhouse shouid be taken as the test of destitution

was not, he thought, applicable to the manufacturing ohs-
tricts. In periods of deep and general distress, such as the
I,resent, relief should be given out of the workhouse to de-,.

serving objects. It appeared to him that a greater degree of
discretion should be placed in the bands of the local boards;
and he did not wish to see the entire administration of rsliet
under the immediate control of Commissioners resid-

ing at a distance from the scene of distress. lie had expected
t.h3t his friends now in power would not have sanctioned
the present system of Peor.laws, and he was sorry to find that
he had been disappointed. Unless the Bill were materially
altered, he should certainly feel it his duty to vote against the
third reading. He was decidedly opposed to the lower as-
sumed by the Government of at once, and arbitrarily, abolish-
ing the Gilbert Unions.

•Strangers were then ordered to withdraw, and the House di-
vided, when there appeared,—
Fisr the'second reading
Against it
Majority for the second reading -199
The Bill was then read a second time, and ordered to be com-
mitted on Monday.
FOREST OF DEAN.
The Report on the Forest of Dean Ecclesiastical Districts
(Advance of Money) Bill was reported after a short discussion,
.11r. Home withdrawing his opposition to the bringing up of
the Report, upon an understanding from the Right Hon. Ba-
ronet, at the head of the Government, that the next stage
should be taken at an early hour, and full opportunity given to
discuss it.

On the motion for the third reading of the Dean Forest Poor
Bill,

Mr. G. BERKELEY moved that the Bill he read a third
time that day six months,
Mr. T. DUNCOMBE moved that the debate should be
adjourned.
Atter a few words from Mr. HUME and the Earl of LINCOLN,
Mr. G. BERKELEY suggested to the lion. Member for
Finsbury to withdraw his motion for adjourning the debate.
Mr. T. Duticombe acceded to this suggestion; the motitin
was withdrawn, and the House divided, when there appeared—
For the third reading of the Bill
Against it ... 2l
Majority in favour of the third reading
The Bill was then read a third time, and passed
ASSESSED TAXES BILL.
The Assessed Taxes Bill was then read• a third time, and
passed.

tJORIT V-NOES,
Ferrand,
Flolliot, John
Fitrroy, Captain
Fleming, J.
Forbes, William
I.remantle, Sir r.
Fuller. A. E.-
Gaskell, James Miltses
Gladstone, W. E.
Glad tone, T.
Glyhne, Sir S. It.
Godson, R.
Gordon, Hon. W.
Gore, Montague
Gore, W. R. 0.
Gomburn, Henry
Gr_ham, Sir James
Grant, Sir A. C.
Greene, T.
Grimschtch, Thomas
Grogan, E.tward
Hamilton, W. J.
Hampden, Renn
siarcourt, G. G.
Hardy, John
Hawkes, T.
Hepburn, Sir T. B.
Herbert, Hon. S.
Hervey, Lord A.
Hiner, J. H.
Hodgson, Richard
tiohnes W. A'Court
!Ape, Hun. C.
Hope, Alexander
Houldsworth, T.
Howard, Lord
Hughes, W. B.
Hussey, Thomas
Ingestre, Lord
Irton, S.
Irving, John
Jollitle, Sir W.
Jones, Theobald
Kemble, Henry
Knatchbuli, Sir E.
Las, son, Andrew
Lefty)+, Anthony
Legh, G. C.
Lincoln, Earl of
Litton, Ec ward
Lockhart, William
Lygon, lion. Gen.
MacKenzie, W. F.
Mackinnon, W. A.
Maclean, D

PAIHE

U OFF.

THE SUN, LONDON, SATURDAY MORNING, JUNE 18, 1842

FROM LAST NIGHT'S GAZETTE.

DOWNING-STREET, JuneE 16, 1842.
The Queen has been graciously pleased to nominate and ap-
point Colonel Sir Robert Henry Sale, Knight Commander of
, the Most Honourable Military Order f the Bath, serving with
the rank of Alajor-General in Affghanistan, to be a Knight
Grand Cross of the said Order.
WAR-OFFICE, JUNE 17.
lst Regiment of Dragoon Guards—Lieut. M. Pipon to be
Captain, by put chase, vice Fuller, who retires; Cornet .1. P.
Cleaver to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Pipon ; Gentle-
man Cadet J. S. S. Stuart, from the Royal Military College,
to he Cornet, by purchase, vine C'eaver, Jane 17.
4th Regiment of Light Drageons—Capt. Lord George A. F.
.-Paget, from half-pay Unattached, to be Captain, vice C. I .
Cumberlege, who exchanges, receiving the difference, June 17.
7th Regiment of Light Dragoons—Assistant-Surgeon M.
Neale, from the 921 Foot, to be Assistant-Surgeon, vice Bea-
van, promoted to be Staff-Surgeon of the Second Class, June 17.
13th Regiment of Light Dragoens—Assistant- Surgeon J.
Sinclair, from the 39th Foot, to be Assistant-Surgeon, vice
Clark, promoted to be Staff-Surgeon of the Second Class.
June 17.
16th Regiment of Light Dragoons—Cornet and Adjutant
P. Dynon to have the rank of Lieutenant, June 16 ; Cornet
A. Need to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Gwynne, who
retires ; J. T. Waller, Gent., to be Cornet, by purchase, vice
Need, June 17 ' • W. Morris, Gent., to be Cornet, by purchase,
vice: Alayne, whose appointment has been cancelled, by
18.
2d Regiment of Foot—Lieut. T. Addison to be Adjutant,
vice Simmons, promoted in the Royal Canadian Regiment,
April 8.
6th Foot—Assistant-Surgeon W. Duncan, from the Staff,
to be Assistant-Surgeon, vice Jackson, deceased, June 17.
20th Foot—Lieutenant G. B. C. Crespigny to be Captain,
by purchase, vice M'Call, who retires; Ensign J. G. L.
Adlereron to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Crespigny ;
'l'. A. Coffin, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Aldo -
cron, June 17.
37th Foot —Lieutenant E. T. Seward to be Captain, by pur-
chase, vice Grignon, who retires ; Ensign R. P. Harrison to
be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Seward; W. J. Bazalgette,
Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Harrison, June 17.
39th Foot—H. Armstrong, Gent., to be Assistant-Surgeon,
rice Sinclair, appointed to the 13th Light Dragoons, June 17.
60th Foot—tirevet Lieut.-Col. W. T. Cockburn to be
Lieutenant • Colonel, without purchase, vice Markham, deceased;
Capt. J. S. Wilford to be Major, vice Cockburn ; First Lieut.
J. K. Mackenzie to be Captain, vice Wilford; Second Lieut.
F. M. Callaghan to be First Lieutenant, vice Mackenzie, April
23 ; J. Wai burton, Gent , to be Second Lieutenant, vice Cal-
laghan, June 17.
92d Foot—W. Bowie. M.D., to be Assistant-Surgeon, vice
Neale, appo sited to the 7th Light Dragoons, June 17.
2d West India Regiment—E. T. Smith, Gent., to be En-
sign, without purchase, vice Orde, deceased, June 17.
Ceylon Rifle Regiment—Lieut. w. Driberg, to be Captain,
without purchase, vice Brevet Major C. Wallett, who retires
upon full pay ; Second Lieut. J. B. Kersteman to be First
Lieutenant, vice Driberg ; G. T. Dawson, Gent., to be Second
Lieutenant, vice Kersteman, June 17.
HOSPITAL STA I' F—ASSiStallt- Surgeon J. Clark, M.D., from
the 13th Light Dragoons, to be Staff-Surgeon of the Second
Class, vice West, appointed to the 99th Foot; H. L. Cowen,
Gent., .to be Assistant-Surgeon to the Forces, vice Duncan, j
appointed to the 6th Foot, June 17.
ADMIRALTY, JUNE 14.

Corps of Royal Marines—H. J. Tribe, Ger.t., to be Sec=
Lieutenant.
Commission by the Lord-Lieutenant of Derbyshire.
Derby Militia—E. Coke, Esq. to be Major, vice Sitwell,
reiigneu, June 11.
CROWN-OFFICE, JUNE 16.
MEMBER RETURNED TO SERVE IN THIS PRESENT
PARLIAMENT.
Borough of Newcastle-under-Lyme—John Quincy Harris,t.f
Winchester-house, Southwark, in the county of Surrey, and
of Brenchley, in the county of Kent, Esq.
WHITEHALL, JUNE 11.

The Lord Chancellor has appointed Henry Bourne, of
Wigton, in the county of Cumberland, Gent., to be a Master
Extraordinary in the High Court of Chancery.
'WHITEHALL, JUNE 14.
The Lord Chancellor has appointed John Markham Carter,
of New AlreJurd, in the county of Southampton, Gent., to be
a Master Extraordinary in the High Court of Chancery.
DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY.
EDWARD HILTON and NATHANIEL WALSH,
paper manufacturers, Manchester.
BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED.
JAMES ROBERTS, licensed victualler, Berwick-street,
Soho.
GEORGE HIBBERT, jun., thesterfield, Derbyshire.
WILLIAM HEADLANii, tailor, Louth, Lincolnshire.
BANKRUPTS.
ROBERT ROBERTS, grocer, Newtown, Montgomery,
to surrender July 8 and at 29, eleven, at the Oak Intl,
R'el-hp col. Dtew and Woosmim, Newtown ; Weeks, Cook's-
court, Lincoln's It n, London.
JAMES ALFRED WEBB and DAVID WEBB, farreere,
Great Marlow, Bucks, June 24th, and July 29, at eleven, at
:.he Court of Bankruptcy. Lackington, official assignee, Cole.
man-street-buildir,gs ; Waller, Finsbury-circus.
JOHN BRETTARGId, timber dealer, Pendleton, I aura-
shire, June 20, and July 19, at ten, at the Commissioners'..
rooms, Manchester. Foster, Manchester; Nethersole. Essex-
street, Strand, London.

ROBERT INSOLL, coach maker, Brighton, June 24 and
July 29, at one, at the Town-hall, Brighton. Williams, Alfred-
place, Bedtord-square' London.
JOSEPH BRADBURY and RALPH BRADBURY,
cotton-spinners, Oldham, July 4, at ten, and 29, at twelve, at
the Commissioners'-rooms, Manchester. J. and W. Heron,
Alsnchester ; Johnson, Son, and Weatherall, Temple, London.
:JOSIAH CUTTELL, clothier, Holmfirth, Yorkshite ;
July 1 at two, and July 29 at ten, at the George lintel, Hud-
dersfield. Cornthwaite, Dean's-court, Doctors'-Commons,
London; Cornthwaite, Liverpool.
JAMES HOPKINS, butcher, Leighton Buzzard, Bedford-
shire, June 24 and July 29, at two, at the Court of Bankruptcy.
Whitmore, official assignee, Basinghall-street; Stevens, Wil-
kinson, and Satchell, Queen-street, Cheapside.
JAMES TOMLIN and WILLIAM MAN, merchants,
Si. Michael's-alley, Cornhill, June 28, at one, and July at
half-past one, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Whitmore, official
assignee, Blisinghall-street ; Ellis. Cooper's-court, Cornhill.
hENRY ENGLISH, printer, New Broad-street. City,
.Tone 24, and July 29, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy,
Juhnson, official assignee, Basinghall-street; Meggy, Great
I'o,-(r-street.
JOH N STEG GALL, bookseller, Guildford-street, June
28, at half-past eleven, and July 29, at twelve, at the Court of
Bankruptcy. Gibson, official-assignee, Basinghall-street ;
Noreutt, Queen-square, Bloomsbury.
WILLIAM SMITH, Leeds, June 28, at four, and July 29,
et ten, at the Commissioners'-rot.ms, Leeds. Poden, Leeds;
Wegstaff, Son, and Marsh, Warrington ; Sharpe, Field, and
Jackson, Bedford-row, London.

DIVIDENDS.
At the Court of Bankruptcy, Basitighall-street.
E. Warne, carpenter, Lisle-street, Westminster, July 8, at,
eleven—E. Hayes, picture dealer, Pickett-street, Strand, July
8, at twelve—NV. IL Lamport, silversmith, Plymouth, July
at halt-past one—J. C. anti I'. Lucas, lozenge manufacturer,,
Aldersgate-street, July 11, at twelve—G. Stringer, furnishing
ironmonger, Islington, July 8, at twelve—S. and T. F. Jack-
son, woolstaplet s, Bermondsey. July 11, at eleven—J. Cuisset,
jeweller, Blackfriars-road, July 8, at eleven—J. Page, en-
graver, Ilorselcrrv-road, Wesiminster, July 12, at one—L. It.
Beale, packer, Marshal-street, Golden-square, July 12, at
twelve--J. and W. Field, wine brokers, Mincing-lane, July 8,
at two—W. J. Duckham, hosier, Little Love-lane, Wood-
street. Cheapside, July 12, at eleven—T. Ilill, jun. and W.
Brookes, me:chants, St. INlarv-axe, July 8, at one—W. Alor-
ris, leather dresser, Long-lane, Bermondsey, July 11, at eleven
—C. lio)d, son-, picture dealer, Kensington-gravel-pits, July
12, at two—J. Bowser, timber merchant, Milton-street,
Dorset-square, July 8, at twelve—W. R. Piggott, carpet ware-
houseman, Goldsmith-street, Wood-street, July 9, at two—H.
J. Nixon, uphol'terer, Great Portland-street, Oxford-street,
July 9, at twelve—W. Hitchcock, linen draper, Regent-street,
July 8, atone—J. Maddox and G. Blenkarn, warehousemen,
Watling-street, July 8, at twelve.

In the Country.
E• S. Webster, draper, Birmingham, July 9, at one, at the
Waterloo-rooms, Birmingham—R. P. Busk, machine maker,
Hutislet, Yorkshire, July 8, at one, at the Commissioners.-
rooms, Leeds—J. R. Berry, wine merchant, Cambridge, July
, 11, at twelve, at the Hoop Hotel, Cambridge—T. Clent,
I victualler, Worcester, July 21, at twelve, at the Offices of C.
Creswell, Worcester—W. Looney, cooper, Whitehaven, July
13, at one, at the Black Lion Inn, Whitehaven---T. Peters,
tailor, Cambridge, July 8, at twelve, at the Bull Inn, Cam-
bridge—A. Buckley, grocer, Newton-moor, Cheshire, July 15,
at twelve, at the Commissioners'-rooms, Manehester—J. Cole,
wonlstapler, Kettering, Northamptonshire, July lb, at twelve,
at the George Inn, Kettering—J. Darbyshire and S. Pope,
calico printers, Alanchester, July 28, at ten, at the Commis-
, shiners -ro. rns. Manchester—T. I%lillership, coal master, Mose-
ley New Colliery, Staffordshire, July 8, at one, at the Swan
1 Hotel, Wolverliamptnn—J. H. Heron, J. S. Heron, J. K.
Heron, and A. Heron, cotton spinners, Manchester, July 12, at.
eleven, at the Commissioners'-rooms, Manchester—l'. Walker,
cotton spinner, 11indley, Lancashire, July 12, at eleven, at the
Town-hall, Preston— r . 13. Molyneux and P. Witherby, mer-
chants, Liverpool, Jul?, 9, at two.
CER FIFICA TES—JULY 8.
P. Butler, butcher, Leamington Priors, Warwickshire—ll.
C. Churchyard and J. Holmes, wonlstaplers, Ilalifax, York-
shire—W. Halliday, innkeeper, Liverpool—S. Lees, innkeeper,
Manchester—W. Brain, general shopkeel.er, 11Iaehen, Aloft-
mouthshire—J. Pearey, leather seller, St. John-street.
PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED.
C. Dowse and 11. Atkinson, law stationers, Chancerv-lane—
W. Bywater and J. Ingham, cloth manufacturers, Smithies,
Ye! ksure--.G. Green and .1. Richards, tailors, Tottenham-
court-road, London—NV, and If. Carass, butchers, Borough-
bridge, Yorkshire—G, Howard, 11. Rawsthorne, and
Ellston, iron founders, llaslingden, Lancaster—It. A. Ames
:.nd R. S. Johnson, linen drapers, Clifton-street, Finsbury—
W. Atherton and J. Watson, flint-glass manufacturers, Alan-
chester—W. T. and W. Gylby, surgeons, East Retford, Not-
tingham—J. N. Gardner and A. 'Middleton, circulating li-
brary, Warrington, Lancashire—J. Slack and C. Morton,
paini manufaeturers,lllanchester—R. burning and J. Alartin-
dale, common brewers, itainford. Lancashire—J. Labrey, W.
LalTev, J. Labrey, and .1. Whitlow, tea merchants, Hudders-
field, Yorkshire—J. C. Watson, It. S. Watson, and W. Frank-
land, linen drapers, Whitby, Yoikshire (so far as regards It.
S. Watson.)

SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS.
ALEXANDER MILLOY and JOHN iMILLOY, graziers,
As',field, Argyleshire, June 24 and July 13, at one, at the
Argyle Hotel, Inverary.
WILLIAM MUIR, Wright, Perth, June 23 and July 14, at
twelve, at the Chambers of Gray and Jameson, Perth.
DAVID MARTIN and CO., manufacturers, Glasgow,
June 23 andJely 14, at two, at M.Ewan and Auld's, account-
ants, Glasgow.
JAMES DANIEL, printer, Aberdeen, June 23 and July
16, Lt twelve, at the Chambers of A. Pittendrigh, Aberdeen.