The Sun.
London, England, 1820-02-22 00:00:00

MAJESTY." IS it possible that The Chronicle can

suppose that the world will give credit to this

charge against Ministers ? We consider it as the

most impudent falsehood that ever cause frost► the

polluted source of Faction.

Ministers must have

beets inad if they could have thought of

covcealing such information from his 51A-

JESTY, evczt if concealment were possible,
upon a subject so near to his NIAJEPTY'S feelings,

and so, intimately connected wit!' the honour of

his Crown. His MAJESTY, no doubt, consulted
witl► Ministers on a subject of such national im-

portanee, and must, in the whole progress of the

inquiry, have been fully apprized of all the cir-

cuaistances attending it. We repeat our con-

viciion, that this charge against Ministers is an un-
blushing falsehood, and an outrageous insult to the
common sense of the People. %Ire again say, that
the subject no longer admits of delicacy. It has been
dragged forward by Party. Not only the People of
this Cirowry, but the moral World, are deeply inte-
rested in the Ingoit y. The conduct imputed to the
QUEEN must be the subject of serious and solemn
investigation. Before a provision is made for
her, suitable to her nominal rank in the State, it
should be satisfactorily proved to the People that
she is,deserving of it. We agree heartily with
Mr. TIERNEY, that there are " rumours with re-
gard to the behaviour of the Quiert,' which, if
true, could leave no doubt that 'she was totally
unworthy to occupy the Throne of England ; and
if so, the KING is surely entitled to the same
justice thtit the Law granted to the lotw•est sub-
ject in relieving him from a degraded connection."
Rut the claims of his MAJESTY on such an oeea•
Sion, ate incalculably superior to those of any
other individual, however high or low, because
the honour and ioterest of a great Empire are
concerned, and because information may transpire,
and events arise, that may deeply affect the sta-
bility of the Throne, and the welfare of the Coon-
y, to a very distant period. IVe shall resume
this subject, as Ile deed' it a questiOn of national
import a lice, repeat hug our conviction, that as the
veil, not only of delicacy, but even of common!

decency, has been withdrawn, it ought not, nor is
it now possible for it, to be smothered by Policy,
and buried in Oblivion.

Mr. BROUGHAM is reported to have said last

night in the House of Commons, speaking of the
consent of the King, that d' her right was as good
as that of his Majesty to the Throne, and that
that tight could not lie in the least affected by any
of the circumstances that had been alluded to, ot•
by the manner in which she win Mentioned in
Parliament." The Chronicle says, that Lord CAS-
TLEREAGH " took occasion to compliment Warmly
Mr. littotlGumg's speech." We confess we see no
reason for such complin►ent. Mr. BROUGHAM
knows that the subject cannot be suppressed, but
be seems to think, as every body else must think,
that it should not be precipitately or malevolently
brought forward. to serve the ends of Party, or
wantonly, for the sake of gratifying any indivi-
dual who, horn a love of notoriety, or the im-
pulse of venal ambition, might be disposed to
force it upon public attention.

‘Ve received this nioruing the Paris Papers of
Saturday last. The Count DEcAzus is said to be
out of Office.—The following are extracts