The Sun.
London, England, 1820-07-07 00:00:00

MONARCHY OF SOUTII AMERICA.

Sir ROBERT WILSON seeing the Noble Lord (Castle-
reagh, wi.hed-tu asR nlin a question or consider-
able importance to the mercantile and political interests of
this country. He wished to know from the Noble Lord, if
Government li:sd received any official communication of a pro-
position on the part of the French Government, not only to
recognize the independence of South America, but to place
a Member of the House of Bourbon on the throne, which it
was intended to erect in that country?
Lord CASTLEREAGH said, that in the present state of
the information in the possession of Government, he should
decline answering the question-of the Hon. Member.
THE QUEEN.

Air. HOLFORD appealed at the Bar of the House,
•nd stated, that be was charged to deliver the
Report. of the Committee appointed to examine

the Journals of the House of Louts. lie then
stated, that by the Journals of the House of
Lords, it appeared, that her Majesty the Queen,
had sent ►town a petition to that House, begging
to be forthwith heard by Counsel, touching•cer-
tain matters of importance, to be heard in that
stage of the proceedings against her Majesty
That this request being opposed, the question was
put and negatived : That the Earl of Liverpool
then presented a Bill to deprive her Majesty of
her rights, title, and dignity, as Queen of these
Realms, which was immediately read a first time,
and a copy of it ordered to he sent to her Ma-
jesty's Legal Advisers.
Lord CASTLEREAGH rose 'immediately after the
reading of the Report, and was proceeding to ex-
plain the grounds of the motion he was about to
make its pursuance of the notice he had given the
preceding night, when
Mr. TIERNEY interrupted the Noble Lord, to
observe, that in the course he was about to pursue,
that of abandoning his motion on the Queen's An-
swer to the Resolution of that House, which stood
on the top of the List of Notices for the Day, and
of proceeding to another which stood at the bot-
tom of the List, he would completely anticipate
the motion of a Gallant Friend or his (Sir IL Fer-
gusson), which stood half way between the two,
thereby taking priority of the motion upon which
the Noble Lord was about to eater, when he in-
terrupted him. lie presumed the Noble Lord
must either confine himself to the former motion,
of which be had given notice a fortnight back,
or must allow the Gallant General to take Isis turn
and precede him.
Lord CASTLEREAGH observed that in giving his
notices, he had intended it to be understood that
he directed himself to the general proceedings in
tl►e matter, and he apprebeaded that the proceed-
►ugs in the House of Lords governed the course
he was to take ou this occasion. lie was willing
to be guided by the Speaker.
The SPEAKER, in his explanation, said, that the
giving notice of a motion was, silkily speaking,.
matter of courtesy, and that as far as he was'able
to determine in the present case, it must remain
a question for the consideration of the House how
far the course the Noble Lord meant to pursue
might nut be thought consistent with the gene-
ral nature of his first. notice, which was that of
a '' Motion founded on the Queen's reply to the
Resolution of that H ouse."
Alter wine further conversation, in which Mr: