The Sun.
London, England, 1820-10-12 00:00:00

FOR THE SUN.

MORE CONSPIRACIES.
MR. EDITOR—A most alarming and nefarious
Conspiracy, we understand, has been carrying on
for this last three months, in which his MAJES-
TY'S Government are so far implicated, that it
can be fully proved they have supplied the funds
for its support and maintenance. It is well
known, that a number of treasonable papers, of
a most seditious tendency, have for some time
past been sent down the Western road, to which
answers more treasonable and even more seditious
have been returned H
It is also incontestably proved that his MA-
JESTY'S Government have supplied sums of money
to the parties engaggd in these transactions to the
amount of Thirty Thousand Pounds Sterling 1 ! !
ALDERMAN BRAND YBURGII and a meddling City
Lawyer are believed to know all about it; and
it is hoped by all good and loyal subjects that the
affair will speedily be traced' through all its ra-
mifications, to the utter confusion of all parties
concerned.—The Alderman says, however, that
he does not expect to make any great change iu
the Government—at present. He is so much en-
gaged with St. Giles, St. Catharine, and Saint
Caroline, that he has not time to attend to St.
James! It is now understood that this affair is
connected with the seditious Conspiracy ?

DETECTOR.

MEDICAL BOARD, NEAR BLACKFRIAR'S ROAD.

Sir FRANCIS DANIEL, M. D. Treasurer.

Messrs. COOPER, MUNROE, and Co. Physicians
and Surgeons, of nearly forty years' experience,
Members of the Royal Colleges of London, Edin-
burgh, and Dublin, whose success in practice is
unparalleled in the annals of Medicine, fo►,
lar as it may appear, during the last seven years,
upwards of 30,000 Patients have been cured of
prevailing diseases, many of the cases, after re-
spectable Surgeons, and 'even Hospitals, have
failed.

Messrs: COOPER and Co. claim the attention
of those who have been injured and deceived'
by the specious promises of illiterate pre-
tenders.-.-Mark- the consequences of the gno-
rant practitioner—Eruptions on the head, face,
and body, ulcerated throat, swellings in the neck,
strictures, ..tistulas, nodes on the shin-bones,
swelled alleles, noise in the ears, dimness of sight,
Mains in the head and limbs, frequently mistaken,
and often fatally treated, as Rheumatism, owing
to the improper use of mercur-.
Messrs. 'COOPER and Co., are consulted at
Charlotte House, Charlotte-street, opposite the
Rev. Rowland Chapel, and Woodstock
House, near Bond-street, daily from-eight in the
morning till nine at night.

e gratis to the Labouring Class every
evening from six to nine, and on Sunday mornings
until twelve o'clock.

N. B. Ruptures of 24 inches in circumference,
of 3(1 years' standing, are returned and cured
without confinement. Trusses are made under
their own inspection, on a much improved prin-
ciple, differing from all others n3w in existence.
*** Letters, stating particulars, containing a
lee, answered by return of post, when Medicines
and the best advice till be sent to all parts of
the kingdom.

PARLIAMENT,

HOUSE OF LORD'i---YESTERDA.V.

THE QUEEN'S DEFENCE.
Noniinuation of Yesierdays Proceedings.]

The following is the conclusion of the Exami-
nation of Lieutenant HOWNAM :
.The ATTORNEY-GENERAL felt it incumbent
en him to object to this question, because he ap-
prehended that any direction that her Royal
• highness might have given to this witness on the
Tobject of the Baron d'Omptedn, could not be
evidence in this cause. I f any thing that ha:l
teen 'said by her Royal Highness to Mr. How-
- ram, or to any other person, on matters foreign
-t3 the subject of this inquiry; were to be admit-
ted as evidence, he did not know where they
:could stop. Her conduct was the subject of
i7!quiry, and any part of that 'conduct, or any
thing immediately connected with it, was evi-
e.Oice ; but her conversations, or any declaration
was • not so, and the subject of the question
- raw proposed amounting only to a declaration
made by her Royal Highness, was not, he hum-
bly submitted, admissible evidence in the case.
Mr. TINDAL said, that if any conduct of her
Royal Highness or of this, witness resulted from
taeh declaration, he humbly thought that it was
evidence to be submitted to their , Lordships.
-Suppose, for instance, it led to- the proving that
Baron d'Ompteda had been .requested, by the
direction of her Royal Highness, never to enter
Itfr house again.
The LORD* CHANCELLOR said, that the pro'er
may appeared to him to be this :—first to ask the
witness, whether lie did any thing, and then t 9
ask him why he did it.
Lieutenant Hownam being again called in, his
examination was resnmed by Mr. TINDAL.
• Q. In consequence of any directions of her
• Royal Highness to you, did you do any thing,
or take any step with respect to the Baron
rilOMpteda I—A. I did, in consequence of her
representation.
What did you do ?—I called him out.
Did you at any other time do any thing at
Tome, respecting the Baron d'Ompteda?—l did.
:What was that ?—I told the servants of the
Reuse, that they were not to molest or take any
• notice whatever of the Baron d'Ompteda, if they
• shoUld meet him. -
Was Theodore Majocci one of those servants?
—I am most positive that he was.
-,(This answer having appeared to some to be
" almost positive," the question was repeated,
the same answer given, and then the question and
answer read by the short-hand writer.]
Do you recollect on any occasion her Royal
Highness visiting any of her servants when they
were ill and in bed ?—Frequently.
Do you recollect in particular her visiting a
servant named Camera, when he was ill do.
Where did she visit him?—At Jerusalem.
I.Vhat was the nature of his complaint I—We
imagined it to be the plague.
Was it stated to her Royal Highness before
she- went to him that it was the plague ?-7-I can-
,not say ; but he was- excessively ill.
Did you see, were you present, when her Royal
Highness visited him ?—I was not present, but
T saw her afterwards, and she said she had just
been to see him. •
Do you remember her visiting any other per-
-sans of her suite when they were ill I—l do.
-Was her Royal 'Highness received at. the dif-
ferent Courts where she visited by persons of
the first rank or not I—Always, except at Vienna.
'Who was the* British Ambassador at Vienna?
-Lord Stewart.
o.n those occasions when she was so received
at the"several Courts, what was the conduct and
demeanour, and the appearance of her R. H. 1—
It' was every thing of majesty and grace.
'How was her Royal Highness treated at
thoSe CourtSl—With the greatest respect and
attention.
I) you remember her Royal Highness tra-
velling from Ancona towards Rome ?—Yes, I do.
Do .you happen to know who was the courier
emptoied onethat occasion ?—I cannot speak po-
sitivety,.but I think it was Carlo Forti.
V° you remember the subsequent journey, from
Roipe to Senegaglia ?—I do.
Do you remember 'in what carriage her Royal
Highness travelled at that time I—ln an English
laudaulet ; I am most positive as to this point.
fn what carriage did you travel yourself ?—ln
an English landau, I think, it is a long time ago.
Do you remember who accompanied you ?—I
think the COunt Schiavini,'Madame Dumont, and
her sister.
• Do you remember.any thing happening to the
'Countess Oldi.on that journey ?—No.
I am speaking of the journey from Rome to
Senegaglia ?—Yes ; she was poorly on the jour-
ney from Ancona to Rome.
Was she taken ill I—She was.
• On that occasion was there any alteration in the
'arrangement of the carriages ?—We changed car-
riages; she came into my landau, and Dumont
went into the carriage of her Royal Highness.
Did you go back from Rome to Senegaglia ?-
110.!e did.
Was that the only journey you took from
'.Rome,to Senegaglia, till after the King's death ?
was the only journey we ever performed
froth, Rome to Senegaglia.
Have you any recollection yourself who' per-
' larmed the office of courier on that journey
•110--notrecollect—there were two couriers in her
'Majesty's service.
'By adverting to any thing which occurred on
the road, could you recollect who of those two
couriers rode on that journey ?—I do not recol-
lect positively which of the two, Carlo Forti and
Sacchi.
Do_you mean two couriers in the service of
her Royal Highness do.
Can you, by referring to any thing, recollect
which of them rode that . journey cannot re-
-Collect.
Can you at all recollect if Sacchi was taken ill

du ,that journey ; do you know the fact of his
being, ill ?—I am veil), imperfect in my recollec-
tion as to that : but I remember he was unwell.
Do you remember on the journey to Rome any
accident, happening to the horses ?—I do. -
What wh.s the accident ?—lt was an accident
from the horses of the. Princess's carriage taking
fright on leaving Ancona.
How long, in the whole, have you beefs in the
society of her Royal Highness as pare, of her
suite ?—Only from April, 1815, to 1818.
Have you been from A Aril 1815, to April 1818,
constantly with her Royal Highness ?—I have.
In all that time, have you ever observed any
thing either in the conduct of her Royal High-
ness towards Bergami, or of Berai towards her
Royal }Ugliness, that ;was improper„ indecent, or
degrading to the station of her Royal Highness ?
I have not.
What ttlary, had you when you were attached
to her Ro;a1 Highness's suite ?—Two hundred
pounds a-y ar.
Does her Royal Highness continue to pay you
that salary to the present time ?—Yes.
(Costs-exatained by the ATT 0 ftlq EY-G EN En AT..
(1. You are a Lieutenant in the Royal Navy ?
A. I am.
How long had 'Jou been in the Navy before
you became- a Lieutenant ?—Six years.
'I believe your father has been in the service of
her Royal Highness—he was a Page, I believe ?
—lie was. ,

Do you know how long he was in that service
with heK Royal Highness ?—ln the service of her
Royal Highness I do not know ; but he was all
his life in the service of his present Majesty, or
of the Princess Charlotte.
I believe her Royal Highness interested her-
self in your promotion ?—Very much.
Through her good offices. you were promoted
to the rank of Lieutenant ?—I was.
When was it you joined her Royal Highness's
suite ?—ln April, 1815..
At Genoa ?—Yes.
In what capacity do not know exactly ;
I Was receiving the salary of an equerry, as I
was told.

You do not know in what capacity you were
attached to her suite ?—No ; I do not. At the
time it was my conviction I was acting as equerry.
What situation did you subsequently fill in her
Royal Highness's suite.—None.
flow lona were you at Genoa before you quit-
ted it foe Milan ?—About six weeks.
Was Bergami a courier at that time ?—He was.
And wore the dress of a courier ?—And wore
the dress of a courier.
How long after your arrival at Milan was it
when her Royal Highness was left without any
English Ladies of Honour ?—About ten or twelve
days after her arrival at Milan. •
How soon-after she was left without any Eng-
lish Ladies of Honour was she joined by the
Countess of Oldi ?—One or two days probably.

Before the Countess came, had Faustina come
into her Royal Highness's service ?—She came to
Genoa with the child.
lid she not live in the family ?—Yes.
Before the Countess Oldi came, had not Faus-
tina and Victorine joined the suite. of the Prin-
cess I—She came to Genoa with the child, and I
understand afterwards lived with the family.
Did you never see them in the. family at Ge-
noa ?-4 never saw them at Genoa, but by ha-
zard in the garden.
How often have you seen them by hazard in
the garden at Genoa ?—Once or twice—sufficient
to know that they were there.
D:d you not know that she was living in the
same house with her Royal Highness 1-1 knew
that she lived in the house at Genoa.
In the Princess's house I—Yes.
Did the mother of Bergami come to the Prin-
cess's house at Genoa?—She was there at that
time; I think she came with Faustina and the child.
Was she also residing at the Princess's house
at Genoa ?—Yes.
Did not Louis Bergami come also into the
Princess's service at Genoa and form part of the
family ?—He was there before I arrived.
What situation did he fill ?—That of page.
Do you mean by page an upper servant?—l do.
Did he wear a livery ?—Yes, or rather a sort
of livery. •
You have stated that you accompanied her
Royal Highness on her tour to Mount St. Go-
thard ?—I did.
Did Bergami accompany her Royal Highness
on that occasion inhis capacity of courier ?—Yes.
How long, after you left Milan, was her Royal
Highness left without any English Lady of
Honour ?—About ten or twelve days after our
arrival at Milan.
How soon after did the Countess of Oldi ar-
rive ?—ln one or two days probably.
had Faustina and Victorine joined her Royal.
Highness's, family before the Countess of Oldi
joined ?—I never saw them at Genoa, but by
hazard in the garden once or‘twice. I saw them
in the house.
Did they live at the Princess's house at Genoa?
Yes. -
When did the mother of Bergami come ?—I
think ,with the child.
Was she in the Princess's house At Genoa ?
Yes, to the best of my recollection.
Did not Louis Bergami join her Royal High-
ness at Genoa ?—He was there when I joined.
What situation did he hold ?—That of page.
Was he' an upper servant ?—Yes.
Did he wear a livery ?—A sort of uniform
rather than a livery.
You said you went with her Royal Highness
on a tour to Mount St. Gothard ?—Yes, I did.
Did Bergami accompany her Royal Highness
at that time as a courier ?—He was dressed in
a courier's dress, but he rode in a carriage.
With whom ? With Hyeronymus, I think it was.
Was Hieronymus at that time courier ?—He
wore a courier's dress, but he was maitre de ho-
tel at that time.
Hieronymus and Bergami, both having cou-
rier's dresses, travelled together in the same car-
riage ?—Yes.
In what month was this I—ln August, 1815.

The witness then said that her Royal High-
ness dined at Bellinzona, in company with a
Professor l'omazea, and a man who lived upon
Mount St. Gothard. Bergami was dressed as
a courier, and dined also at the table, as 'well as

witness. - -‘ ‘
Did' you dine with her Royal Highness on that
occasion ?—I Aid.
Iv, ... •.*
Yo'n remained tab at le 'during the whole time
she was at dinner ?—/. did.
You have stated that Bergami occasionally
dined with her Royal Highness ; did he, after
that, dine with her Royal Highness in his cou-
rier's dress ?—He did.
When did Bergami begin regularly_ to dine
with her Royal Highness ?—About the month of
September, but cannot answer to a few days
precisely.
. Did Bergami dine with her Royal Highness at
'Lugano ?—That was on our return from our jour-
ney to Mount St. Gothard.
But did he not dine with her there ?—He did.
Was he not then a courier, as when he former-
, ly dined with her, Royal Highness I—That was
on the same journey.
I know it was, but was he not then a courier ?
1 He was.
.. .

Do you remember any other place at which he
dined with her Royal Highness on that journey?
did he not dine with her at the Devil's Bridge ?
He did.
On this occasion was he not in the dress of a
courier I—He was.

vv
I believe, when her Royal Highness was at the
Villa d'Este, Mr. Burrell left her Royal High-
ness ?—lt was at the Villa Villani.
Mr. Burrell was not on that journey ?—I be-
lieve not.