The Sun.
London, England, 1829-11-20 00:00:00

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT.

PERRY V. POWELL. Idled
A gentleman behind the bar, upon this case being c d
on, requested that it might stand over till Monday, thejelo
fondant sueing in forma pauperis, and Mr. Knight, 'oB
had been appointed by the Court as his Counsel, not be
perfectly ready to proceed with it.—Leave given.
FRY V. LORD SHERBORNE. . of
The question in this case arose upon the construction
a settlement made on the marriage of a gentlerostito
the name of Escourt Creswell with a lady named NW
The principal clause of the settlement on which tbeA"ste
tion turned was, " if any of the said daughters shoul(!rog
taro the age of twenty-one years, or be married, '7O
the life of Mr. Creswell, then such portions (I the
each to his daughters) should be paid six months tt: the
decease of Mr. Creswell." The lady, under low-, o-f/iir•
present plaintiff claimed, died previous to the de3u,-„,
Creswell, her father ; and the question was, wilet"..a- •
-
tier the words of the settlement she acquired a TO. ores
terest in her portion, which was transmitted to. the rte
sent plaintiff. The case appeared likely to wag
Court the whole day.

COURT OF RING'S BENCH.
At eleven o'clock the Court was so dark from the deli"
sity of the fog, that the Judges were obliged to orde'
candles.
wiLtcock V. WHITTAKER.
This was an action against the Sheriff of the coutittio
Middlesex, for a refusal to execute a writ directed to
against Kirk. The case having been previously OSA
at great length, was again brought on this morning. 448
Sheriff, it appeared, had been informed when he 00'4
the writ, that it was issued without any affidavit of mid,
having been made. Other irregularities were obs'ira
and the Sheriff refused, on the ground that he shoo Iv
liable to an action if be imprisoned Kirk upon it.erif
pla.mtiff, however, brought his action against the 7.. A
for the debt due by Kirk. The ease was again argu;or
great length this morning, and the Court took time W
cider before delivering their judgment.

ROLLS COURT.
°
WELLER V. WELLER. ia be
Mr.Wnrridansir. stated the object of this petition o 6
reference to the Master for the approval of pr°Per rootil
toJ
tottc
ohlifieeol
uihuleanoegl
sringheogulhwhavaatbe-vadnecid aiiegetndivsooei
fiolnd,
not
thtpthsoehrjepoeri
improperly
Brasplaintiffs,eulnjyrctttskhlehtenroaasdtite. werisieeeioesmpna weree:l:ai:diahnrr
appeared
ntiwinht aef:
fon:
brpot:4oehrTe
00:0:0:0
efot
orpooce:'e
h
Made upon certain terms.
Mr. BICSERSTETH, after looking at all the fact:t final'
case, thought it right to submit to the Court -i:of°rth';
consideration should be given to the case of tbe s ialt-n
nate mother. She was at the present rtiontoe° erte7aea
greatest distress ; it was true she had led cl7,n,
man who was insolvent, and such conduct P-0„0,110.1"-
the Court to discharge her from being„ :of c°,s
yet he trusted that his Honour, following the Ptotal 3:,
duct pursued by Lord Eldon in the case of Ors",i,esal°;i
Bradshaw, would direct the Master to increase ""0- et10"0
ance to the children, fur the purpose of gieig 50,.,•,*i1kt1,
to this unfortunate woman. The children were "-:pow
in the world, and would he hurt on seeing their ,
er
destitute of the means of suiolistence. .0 A
The Mama of the ROLLS considered the circuroi 004-;-,
of this case, and those in which the Court had aut :00.0.ir
orders, totally different. Where parties who weree 01.
were ;laced by the COUrt under die prvtection ho,il
parents it was for the interest of the children] ~,e„,
parents should make a respectable appearatut iv lir
Here the mother had married asecond hushando42 a be
the children by the order of the Court %Wens fib'
rated from her, and unless he mistook the petition sre,/1114;
it was stated that the mother and her hosbana_ : le,
stracted a great part of the money provided tot be col!
Mr. BICNERSTETH observed that was not ee"....
tell°
gation was that they had contracted debts. ,d,s
The MASTER or THE ROLLS felt himself- 07 ... i., of
what he had previously stated wall. t-CCEL- ,i worificor
Mr. Bicipcsarzern thought this a case We" no lee'
the compainion of the Court. There were case ce to
where even the Court hail extended its indulge° Aeog
thus a and sisters of infants. eOT - the P
~ The ilairica OF THE ROLLS..—That WES r re.
10
filf keettitig them respectable. fa Oita or
mt;:illek kisTET it submitted, that it Was ;',OOl-
rest of the infants in this case that the mother 6
it
pear respectable. nieio°l4ef °
The MASTER OF THE ROLLS—I am of or- n o al''
not, they were to he sevarated front her 11 sooe,,gic
this Court, in consequence of her improper foltri,,i;l
Misconduct. The reference must be made t°'
etit '
iord
il
in the usull form. ot,, OP 06
The Cootsv took consent causes and p
of thirty of which which were dis I,ose - - I "I. l'efeo
,
---,--
04

COURT OF COMMON • '
CLARasort LawsON• tots is
This was an action brought by the plain P
in Doctors' Commons, a2ainst the defeodawodoit
printer of the Times newspaper. The deleinyitlfr.oe
in a plea of justification, to which the Ptiio.4; 1
murred. After a long argument, the CO tile 6
to be technically bad, and allowed the dev„„lfiottlii. •
No case of importance came before the id"
part of the day.