The Sun.
London, England, 1827-08-13 00:00:00

LONDON, MONDAY EVENING, AUGUST 13, 1827.

L'CONOMIC LIFE ASSURANCE
SOCIETY, No. 34, Bridge-street, Blackfriars.

DIRECTORS. •
Sir JAMES MACKINTOSH, M.P. Chairman.
THOMAS FRANKLAND LEWIS, Esq. M.P. Deputy
Chairman.

Lancelot .Baugh Allen, Esq.
Stephen Nicholson Barber,

Capt. George Harris, R.N.
C. B.
Francis Kemble, Esq.
John Knowles, Esq. F.R.S.
Thomas Meta, Esq.
Henry Frederick Stephen-
son, Esq.
Esq. ; John Kymer, Esq. ;
, F. R. S.

Esq.
Robert Biddulph, Esq.
Thomas Fenn, Esq.
Adam Gordon, Esq.

AUDITORS.—M. W. Clifton
J. Whishaw,

PHYSICIAN.-John Paris, M.D. F.R.S. 28, Dover-street.
SURG HON.-Benjamin Travers, Esq. F.R. S. 12, Brnton-st.
Soucaon.—Henry Young, Esq. Essex-street, Strand.
ACT MARY. —Mr. John Naylor.
ADVANTAGES BELONGING TO. THIS INSTI-

THE NATIONAL SILK WEAVERS' SOCIETY,
Established for the sole purpose of giving constant Em-
ployment to the poor Weavers and their numerous Fa-
ntilies of Spitaffields, and to educate 500, and clothe
200 of their Children; and also to educate an unlimited
number of the Children of other industrious Silk-Weavers.
THEIR PATRONS, and the NOBILITY
and Public, are most respectfully informed, that their
Establishment, 59, Oxford-street, WILL OPEN on
MONDAY, the 25th Day of this Month, and that they
have commenced Selling at their Warehouse, No. 15, De-
vonshire-square, Bishopsgate-street, opposite the Church,
previous to opening their Retail House, at No. 59, Oxford-
street. They cut at their Warehouse any quantity of Silk
from the piece, at one penny per yard on the cost price,
where they always keep ready manufactured rich bucape,
plain and figured Gros de Naples, stout Lustring and Sarsnet,
Black and coloured Levantines, and Satins of every de-
scription and quality, and a most extensive assortment of
rich Silk Damasks, including, amongst a variety of others,
Thirty new Patterns of elegant Taberets, the designs of
which are perfectly Original, and executed exclusively for
the Society, consequently will be found the greatest no-
velty ever submitted to public inspection.
Ladies are most respectfully informed that it is not
profit they seek, but only sufficient to cover expences, and
keep the men in constant employment. Those Ladies and
Gentlemen whowill honour the Societyby becoming yearly
Subscribers of Ten Shillings, will be waited upon at their
respective dwellings by one of the members of the Com-
mittee, with every new Pattern of Silk previous to their
being submitted to public sale.
The Subscriptions will go to the Fund of the Society,
to provide for the benevolent purposes for which it has
been established, viz.—at each member's death, 12/. A
member's wife's death, 61. If any member sick, Its. per
week, and if out of employment, I Os.
The purchasers, if they wish, may see rich Silks in the
progress of being manufactured.
W. G. GARLAND, Secretary.

SUMMER ASSIZES.

NORFOLK CIRCUIT, NORWICH, AuG. 10.

The following trial excited a very general interest
throughout the county, and the Court was crowded
at an early hour this morning,

FENTON, GENT. V. THURTELE, ESQ.

Mr. SIDNEY TAYLOR said, this action had been
brought by Mr. Francis Tarrant Fenton, a solicitor,
residing in London, against Thomas Thurtell, Esq.,
an Alderman of this city, to recover 4001., the
amount of the costs incurred by him in the defence
of John Thurtell, the son of the defendant. There
was a count for work and labour, and the usual
money counts.

Mr. Sergeant STORKES said this action was brought
to recover from the father of that extraordinary and
ill-fated young man, John Thurtell, the amount of
the plaintiff's bill of costs, incurred in defending the
son ; and whether it was wise in the defendant to
resist the claim—or whether it would not have been
more considerate that he should not have compelled
the plaintiff to bring again before the public facts
which he should have conceived the defendant
would have been anxious to have buried in oblivion,
the issue of the trial would show. It would be
proved, that when John Thurtell was charged with
the murder of which he was afterwards convicted,
the present defendant and two of his friends entered
into some negociation with Mr. Jay, a solicitor at
Norwich, for the purpose of employing a London
attorney. It could not be imagined that a father
would be dead to the feelings of a parent, and stand
aloof on such an occasion. Mr. Jay proceeded to
London, in consequence of an arrangement with
the defendant and his two friends, and the plaintiff
was employed. The two gentlemen he alluded to
were Mr. Unthanke, an attorney of Norwich, and
Mr. Alderman Bolingbroke ; and at a meeting with
Mr. Jay, they said that 10!. were quite sufficient to
pay for John Thurtell's defence. How Mr. Unthanke,
an attorney, could think so, was surprising. Mr.
Fenton was no party to that conversation, and it was
quite preposterous and absurd to say that a case of
that description could be defended for so small a sum
as 10/.; they might as well have mentioned the
smallest coin in the realm. When Mr. Fenton was
first applied to, nothing was said to him by Mr.
Jay, that the defendant would not be pledged to pay
more than 10/., and the plaintiff immediately pro-
ceeded in preparing the defence of John Thurtell.
Some of the Magistrates of Hertford having refused
Mr. Fenton admission to the gaol, to see his client,
he found it necessary to apply to the King's Bench
for a mandamus, as he could be of no service N the
unhappy prisoner unless he had a personal communi-
cation with him. The Court of King's Bench
granted the mandamus, and the expence of the ap-
plication formed part of the claim which the plaintiff
sought to recover by this action. The news-
papers at that time published expartc state-
ments, not calculated to create the best effects
as regarded the prisoner; and Mr. Fenton, as the
legal guardian of his client's interests, applied to the
Court of King's Bench for criminal informations
against the proprietors and publishers of several
papers. The costs of these proceedings were very
large; but Mr. Fenton asked for no more than the
bare expences he had been put LO, and required no-
thing for his time and professional services. He had
performed his work faithfully, and the charges were
fair professional charges. Upon an application being
made to the defendant for payment of the plaintiff's
bill, he said that he had not employed the plaintiff
about the mandamus or the criminal informations.
Part of the 400/. the plaintiff admitted to have re-
ceived from different sources, and the Jury, after
hearing the evidence, would say what further sum
he was entitled to.

Mr. John Muuday--I am a solicitor of Norwich;
the plaintiff was my agent in London; I tooka copy
of the plaintiff's bill to the defendant, and also a
letter from the plaintiff, in June, 1825; the letter
produced is a copy. If I did not read the letter, I
acquainted the defendant with the substance ; I be-
lieve the Alderman read the letter, or I read it to
him ; it was dated June 23, 1825.
Cross-examined by Mr. KELLY—A conversation
took place between me and the Alderman, and I
told hildthat if he would pay the expences which

•
Mr. Fenton had incurred in defending his son, he
would forego his charges for loss of time.
The letter which is as follows, was then read :

" Dear Sir—l regret exceedingly that Alderman
Thurtell should compel me to take measures for the re-
covery of my bill, which are to me equally unusual and un-
pleasant. I took up the case merely as matter of business,
.and although I naturally, during its progress, felt a strong
interest in my unfortunate client, yet, I must confess it
would be matter of sorrow to me to have my name again
coupled in a Court of Justice with that he bore ; yet jus-
tice to myself and family requires it. 1 feel sincerely for
his father, and would willingly snake a sacrifice of the time
devoted to the defence of Mr. John Thurtell (which I could
ill spare at the period) if the Alderman would reimburse
me my actual expenditure. lam happy in the reflection
that my services were of a value to my client, which can-
not be estimated by any earthly criteria; the Alderman,
as a reflecting man and a father, would be gratified on
learning that the respite obtained after the first, Assize.% was
employed, not more in endeavouring to protract his son's
existence in this world than in preparing him for another.
Many were the hours of serious conversation I had with
him, and I have since sincere pleasure in the belief that it
was not mis-spent. I occasionally found him in• his cell
ardently engaged in devotion : this is a fact known only
to myself, because John Thurtell, with a feeling very com-
mon, but not the less unaccountable, was ashamed of my
mentioning it. This surely was an end worth obtaining,
even at the expellee occasioned by the pbstponernent of the
trial. If, however, the Alderman should stilt ,resist my
claim, pray wait on him for the name of his attorney,
as I should be sorry to put him to any personal inconve-
nience, " I am, dear Sir, faithfully, yours,
" London, June, 1825. " FRANCIS T. FENTON."

Witness re-examined by Mr. TAYLOR—The de-
fendant said that an interview had taken place be-
tween Mr. Jay, Mr. Unthanke, and Mr. Alderman
Bolingbroke, who were of opinion that 10/. would
be sufficient; he had paid that sum, and he would
pay no more ; he said that if a' shilling would dis-
charge Mr. Fenton's bill he would not pay it; he
did not say any thing about the mandamus or the
criminal informations.

Mr. Jay—l am an attorney at Norwich ; I was
pressed to undertake the defence of John Thurtell;
I had meetings with the defendant on the subject;
the first was in October, 1823 ; I called upon the
Alderman to know if he would defray the ,expence
of his son's defence, and he replied that he should
leave it to his friends; I afterwards met Mr. Un-
thanke and Alderman Bolingbroke at the defend-
ant's house, and the defendant appeared not dis-
posed to go to any great expence ; I called in two
or three days afterwards to know to what extent
the defendant would go • I saw Mr. Unthanke and
Mr. Bolingbroke, and they said they should not ad-
vise the defendant to go beyond. 101.; I went to
London and saw the plaintiff; and communicated
with him on the subject of the defence, and the
plaintiff was employed to conduct the defence; the
charges in hii bill are fair and professional.
By Mr. F. KELLY---I remember that Mr. Alder-
man Thurtell said, if I could pledge myself as to my
belief of his son's innocence, he would stop at no ex-
pence ; I did not so pledge myself; at all the inter-
views with the defendant and his friends the expence
of the defence was limited to 101., which had been
paid. The 101. was to be paid to Counsel for cross-
examining witnesses.

The LORD CHIEF BARON said, that there was not
evidence to go to the Jury, proving the defendant's
liability to pay the claim.

Plaintiff nonsuited.

MIDLAND CIRCITIT.—DERBY, Auc, 11.

John Burns was indicted for feloniously assaulting
Caroline Anne Hinde, at the parish of Chesterfield,
in this county, and there, against her consent, ravish-
ing her.

The trial was one which excited extreme interest,
from the respectability of the friends of the prose-
cutrix, and her alleged youth. It was stated that she
had only reached her twelfth year in October. The
prosecution was conducted by Mr. Clarke, sen., and
Mr. Reader and Mr. Balguy ; and Mr. Clinton ap-
peared for the prisoner.
Caroline Anne Hinde was called, but her ap-
pearance would have induced us to suppose that she
had reached, at least, her eighteenth year. She was
examined by Mr. Reader, and gave the following ac-
count of the transaction in question, and of hea own
conduct :—" I am not yet thirteen years of age ; I
remember the lit of May last ; I was returning from
school, and in approaching a stile, over which it was
necessary for me to pass, I met the prisoner; he
was, in the first instance, walking towards me, but
he returned, and remained close to the stile; when
I had just got over the stile he pulled me towards
him; he pulled me down on the grass, and in that
way he held me for five minutes; I struggled to get
away, but he held me and I could not get away from
him ; he then threw me down, and proceeded to ac-
complish his purpose. (Witness described what had
passed, so as to prove the completion of the crime
charged m the Indictment.] When I reached home
I ran up stair and told the servant what had oc-
curred."

Cross-examined by Air. BALGUY—He remained
about ten minutes, and then I pushed him from me;
when he had continued about seven minutes, I asked
him how much longer he intended to remain ? he
said, three or four minutes; I began to count, and
counted three sixties, and then I pushed him off; I
ran home all the way, and went to bed. The sur-
geon did not come until about eleven o'clock; this
happened about six.

The servant corroborated this statement.
The Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty.
The prisoner, on the application of Mr. CLARKE,
was detained on a charge of misdemeanour.

JESSINGTON V. SIR. JAMES MACKINTOSH AND OTHERS.

In this case the defendants, who were the mem-
bers of the Derbyshire Mining Association, had
suffered judgment to go by default in an action
commenced by the plaintiff for services rendered,
shares of mines sold, and other expenses incurred
by him as their agent.
The plaintiff in this case was a mining agent; he
sought to recover 500/. for services rendered, and
some shares sold to the defendants.

Mr. Ogle, the-laie-SecretaryOf the Company,
was present when the plaintiff was engaged by Mr.
Alsop and Mr. Pigou, two of the Directors of the
Company. They expressed themselves quite satis-
fied with his services, and agreed subsequently that
he should have a salary, commencing in January,
1825, of 250/. a year. He knew also that upon
the business of the Society the plaintiff had been
summoned to London, and continued there for a
month, for which he thought the sum of 50/. was
not an unreasonable charge. He (the secretary) had
paid his expenses to London.
A document, purporting to be the conveyance of
certain shares from the plaintiff to the defendants,
was then put in. The shares were sold at 2604
This was the plaintiff's case.
Mr. DENMAN was relieved from the necessity of
making any observations upon the character of Sir
James Mackintosh, by the admission of his Learned
Friend, that Sir James's conduct throughout this
transaction was in perfect accordance with the esti-
mation in which his public talents were universally
held. It was perfectly true that the defendant,
whom he was proud to call his friend, was exceed-
ingly anxious that this, as well as all other claims,
should have been satisfied without the intervention
of a Court of Law. But so monstrous had the
claims of various parties risen, in proportion, in fact,
to the readiness of the proprietors of this unhappy
scheme to'liquidate them, that it was thought more
advisable, to ascertain the fair and just sums
to which claimants were entitled. Now he must

say, that for such a person as Mr. Jessington was
described to be, 250/. a-year was a liberal remune•
ration. Beside which he was to have 501. for s
month in London, a sum he was quite sure the Jury
would never think of allowing him ; and as to those
pretended shares,' he contended that there was not
the least evidence to satisfy the Jury—first, that they
were worth the sum claimed for them ; and, secondly
that they have been sold.
Mr. L. WILLIAMS, for the other defendants, said
that the , gentlemen for whom he appeared, were
equally anxious with Sir James Mackintosh to meet
the just claiins of all parties who had suffered from a
connexion with this Association. They would, he
felt assured, make no allowance to this plaintiff be-
yond what they thought he had strictly established;
and to their verdict the defendants, whom he repre-
sented, were ready to assent, in the full assurance
that iemust be governed by their sense of justice.
The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, damages
350/.

NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—YORK, Ava. 9.

BAT.AtE AND OTHERS HUTTON AND OTHERS..

This was an action of trover, in which the plain-
tiffs, who are assignees of Messsrs.. Blancart and
Benson, late woolspinners of Bowling, near Brad-
ford, sought to recover against the several defendants
the value of certain machinery taken in execution
after an act of bankruptcy.
Verdict for the plaintiffs—Damages 9641.
FRIDAY, AUGUST 10.
SHAW V. WALSHAW AND ANOTHER.

This was an action of assault and battery. The.
plaintiff, with the two defendants, John and Jo-
nathan Walshaw, farmers at Pennystone, were re-'
turning from Church on Sunday the 20th of Mar.
last, when a quarrel arose between John Shaw, the.
son of the plaintiff, and Job, the son of Jonathan.
Walshaw„ and it was proposed that the two, young
men should fight upon the spot ; but - afterlome al-.
tercation they agreed to fight the next ~• and.
appointed a place. The parties came ingly,
and the plaintiff brought a large stick with him.—
The two men fought in the manner called " up and
down," that is to say, they used their feet as well
as their hands, and did not care where they struckor kicked eachother. In the middle of the combat.
Jonathan Walshaw .asked the plaintiff what he
brought the stick for, and what he meant to do with
it. Some altercation passed between them, and
John Walshaw struck the plaintiff violently; whilst
Jonathan, coming behind him, kicked him with so
much force on the hinder part of the leg, as to fill
his shoe with blood. The plaintiff's witnesses swore
that the plaintiff gave no provocation, and did not
use his stick against the defendants. It was also
proved that the defendants had offered the plaintiff
251. to settle the affair.

Mr. BROUGHAM, for the defendants, submitted
that the plaintiff had brought the stick with him for
no good purpose, and he would show that it had
been used offensively towards them before they had
ill-treated him.

Mr. BROUGHAM called witnesses accordingly, but
they failed in establishing his point.
Mr. Justice BAYLEY said he had had too frequent
occasion to comment upon the savage, cowardly,
and dangerous mode of fighting adopted in a part of
this and the whole of the adjoining county (Lanca-
shire), called " up and down ;" and as that mode
of fighting had been used, he was not sorry that
the action had been brought, as it gave him another
opportunity of stating his deliberate opinion upon
such a brutal practice. He wished ,itto be gene-
rally known throughout both counties, that if life
were destroyed on such occasions, he -would visit all
parties convicted before him with the utmost penalty
of the law. If found guilty of murder, they would
undergo the penalty attached to it; and if convicted
of manslaughter, he would sentence them to trans-
portation for life.
Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 5/.

WESTERN CIRCUIT..—EXETER, Auc. 10.
LEV/ V. BAKER.

This was an action brought by a jeweller anti
pawnbroker, to recover from the defendant, a gentle-
man of fortune, against whom a writ of lunacy had
been lately taken out, the sum of 7631. balance of ac-
count for goods delivered.
Mr. Sergeant WILDE stated, that of the sum for
which the action was brought, two hundred was
claimed for an unpaid cheque of the defendant on his
banker, and the remainder for balance of account on
goods delivered. In August last the defendant,
passing through Exeter, was struck by some article
in the shop window of the plaintiff, and went into the
shop for the purpose of purchasing it. The article
amounted to 201., but during his examination of it,
he was also pleased with some other pieces of
jewellery, which he also bought, to the extent of
80/., for which he gave his cheque on the instant.
His demeanour was that of a gentleman of fortune.
He entered into conversation with the plaintiff, and
told him that he had taken a house at Sidmouth,
and that he would want plate and a variety of ar-
ticles for it. Levi professed his desire to serve him.
Soon after Levi went to the bank to receive money
for his cheque, and met there a Mr. Marsh,
a library keeper at Sidmouth, who observed
to him what a good customer he had got,
and proceeded to tell him that Mr. Baker was in re-
ality a gentleman of fortune, recently settled at Sid-
mouth. While thus engaged Mr. Baker himself
came into the bank, and on seeing Levi and Marsh
together, said that he was much pleased with what
he had bought of the former, and that he intended
to have further dealings with him. On the follow-
ing day, Thursday, Mr. Baker again came to the
plaintiff's shop, and made further purchases from
Levi ; and the plaintiff accompanied him to the
banker's, to make some arrangement with them for
the defendant's remittances, as by some misunder-
standing they had refused one of the cheques. The
following day, Saturday, the plaintiff's shop was
closed, he being a Jew, but after sun-set Mr. Baker
called at his house, and told him that he wanted to
exchange some old plate for new. Further con-
versation took place, in the course of which Mr.
Baker asked the plaintiff if lie would advance hint
some motley ? to which the plaintiff, having the ut-
most confidence in all that he had seen of the de-
fendant, or heard of him from Mr. Marsh, agreed to
lend him 100/., but Mr. Baker saying he had occa-
sion for 2001. more, the plaintiff procured it for him
from his father, and gave him the whole sum of
600/. in eight 50/. notes, and 200 sovereigns. For
this the defendant gave him bills on his banker at
Worcester for 4001., and a cheque on his banker at
Exeter for 2001. The plaintiff went to Worcester on
the following day, to receive the bills for 400/., but
the cheque for 2001. remained unpaid to this day, the,
banker having refused to honour it. On the Monday
following that. transaction, Mr. Baker came to the
plaintiff's shop to order more goods, but it being
observed that his head was affected with wine,
though it was in the morning, it was deemed pru-
dent not to give him any further credit, and the
articles he selected were not delivered. Since that
time-no other transaction had taken place between
the parties. The defence which would probably
be taken to the action was, that Mr. Baker
was labouring under insanity about the time
of the payment of the money and purchase of the
goods. Probably he might have been so, and cir-
cumstances which occurred since had rendered it
more than probable that he was. But, the question
for the Jury was, had the plaintiff notice of the state
of his mind, or did the defendant exhibit before him
any of that extravagance and incoherence which it

1.4. ~ . - —0.:::-.•,.,
.' ...c.k" • ~ ~,4,..,*
*l..' 4 - .. ,
..-:•.:-Ii`':' "0* '-''' ': \V":„ 11'
- ' 4.,;, ", '44 . --'10.1r;;'• ' ??' i 'tz4 a?
•' , ..`-.. ,li • •tosalWi. 13, ,
could IA . ' ~..'f'., ,''''; 77... in tW-Uhit of showing
on other.P.e.• '''-....,-:-.1.' ;:,'.-caid *le, in fact, one of
a fair nattireA mi „1n..-: ar- plaintiff Awis concerned-
He partedAith' his motley and his goods. The
balance due on both he claimed at the hands of
the Jury.
The following evidence was then called on behalf
of the plaintiff:—
The delivery of the goods, to the amount of 801.,
was admitted, but the question of their value was
reserved.
Mary Ellis, a servant of the plaintiff, deposed that,
on giving the order, the deportment of the de-
fendant was the same as that of any other gentleman.
Mr. John Marsh, a library
eeper at Sidmouth,
said that the defendant came to hi( ;.Dose on the 3d
)c
of August, and inquired the name of a hi:4: maste,,r
for his daughter. The defendant lived nu gt;:u
style, with close carriage and a gig. His son and
daughter were with him--the latter was nearly of
age. Went with the defendant to Sid Cliff, a place
of Mr. Bacon's, then on sale. The defendant looked
at the property, ,and made-the observatious.of a sen-
sible and rational. mart.. Came with him:on' the 15th
of August to 'Exeter, and .saw -him next morning at
breakfast. Defendant. showed him a razor handle,
containing six blades and a chronometer, which he
said he bought from Mr. Levi. He said he bought
the watch under 1001., though its .original cost was
more than that sum. Baker gave the witness a
cheque for 231., observing, on showing his cheque-
book, what importance it was to save money by
paying ready money. Saw entry, at the same time,
of a cheque to Mr. Levi. The defendant Leowed
him a bill on Gloucester for 200/. asking him where
he could get cash for it. Witness brought him to a
banker, when the bill was cashed and an account
opened. Witness thought Baker an eccentric man,
but one not of unsound intellect. Had very little
dealing with him. Advanced seven piunds in the
presence of the solicitor to take his chill to school:
Cross-examined—The daughter of the witness
went to live with Miss; Baker as a, companion. A
few days after, the defendant called on him at the
library at Sidmouth. She returned hoMe in ten
days after. Mr. Baker became insane about that
time. Did not acquaint Mr. Levi or his solicitor
that his daughter lived with Miss Baker. Intro-
duced Mr. Baker to a Mr. Tucker, for the purpose
of seeing some curious anatomical preparation. Mr.
Baker asked the price of it. Tucker said it cost
5001. and declared that he would not sell it for less.
Baker took Mr. Tucker and his daughter and the
witness to Sidmouth in his carriage. Baker drove
Miss Tucker on the box, and made the coachman
sit behind the carriage. Does not know whether
Levi and his wife visit respectable families at Exeter
or not. On another occasion Baker drove witness
to a house of bad fame. Baker went into the house,
and witness remained in the carriage at the door.
Baker on another occasion mounted his horse to
show its paces to Mr. and ma. Levi. The daughter
of the witness remained with the daughter of Baker
a week after Baker drove to houses of bad fame.
She was protected by the cook, who W 3.3 a very
steady woman. Miss Baker was of age, and wit-
ness's daughter was rather younger, The first time
witness saw Mr. Baker, he said he was a very odd
character. After Mr. Baker was taken ill, witness
put all his valuable things out of the way, that Mr.
Baker should not see them.

Joseph Levi, father of the plaintiff, has no interest
in his concern ; dissolution of partnership between
him and his son was gazetted in April 1826; lives
next door but one to his son; saw Mr. Baker buy-
ing some things at his son's shop on the 16th of
August; there were chains, seals, watches, and va-
rious articles of jewellery ; saw cheques lying on the
counter; packed up a handsome table-clock, a book
of the Duke of Wellington's wars, a pair of fire-
screens, and a royal saddle-cloth, which were all de-
livered to Mr. Baker at the London Inn, in the pee-
sence of Mr. Anstace, his attorney ; fetched 200
sovereigns by the desire of his son, when Mr. Baker
was at his son's house in the evening; there were
400/. in notes on the table, and Mr. Baker said he
would give a bill on the Worcester Bank for 500/.
and an order at sight on the West of England Bank
for 100/. ; went to look for a stamp, but could, only
procure two stamps covering 2001. each. Mr. Baker
then drew two bills for 2001. each on the Worcester
Bank, and a cheque on the West of England Bank'
for 2001. Baker took the money, counting the notes,
and put them into his pocket. Levi's, son did not
deliver any more goods to Mr. Baker. Baker came
on the following Monday; he was rather wild, and
witness thought him drunk; he came in his carriage
with two other persons.
Cross-examined.--Mr. Baker came to the shop
on the Monday, with women in his carriage. The
women were women of the town. Observed by
Mr. Baker's breath that he had been drinking wine.
Mr. John Bacon recollects being introduced to
Mr. Baker, at Mr. Marsh's, on the 16th of April.
Mr. Baker had been to look at his house and estate
previously. Discussed and negociated for that estate.
Mr. Baker conducted himself in a manner tolerably
collected, but a little peculiar. The price of the
estate was its fair value. Mr. Anstace, Baker's
attorney, came with him on a subsequent day. An
agreement was made and executed for the sale of the -
estate. Mr. Baker breakfasted with witness on the
morning of that day. Prayers are always said be-
fore breakfast at the house of witness. When the
bell was rung for that purpose, Mr. Baker offered
to act as chaplain, and he did read prayers with per-
fect gravity and expression, to the admiration of
every body present. He spoke on various subjects
with judgment and propriety, and introduced vari-
ous quotations aptly, but there was some peculiarity
in his manner. The idea of insanity never entered
the witness's head.

Cross-examined.—Mr. Baler breakfasted with the
witness on the 19th, and a day previous he wanted
to make some alteration in the house before the agree-
ment of sale was signed by the witness; but the wit-
ness forbade the workmen to make them. Bakes
offered to purchase the estate of a Mr. Clarke for
6,000/. without having seen it. His conduct was
extraordinary and precipitate. They went to the
house of Mr. Townsend, and while waiting in the
preasrtlloeusrs, Ba
nadk calledcarinused b forms
er ee l
ffr,vsi ht
hme quotingnts,seemed
poetry v ery
and
fencing. Mr. Baker wanted to purchase some of
the pictures of the house, but witness declined to
part with them. Recommended him a stained glass
window for 100/., which without seeing he requested
the witness to order for him. Mr. Baker came to the
house of the witness on the 22d, quite mad, rolling
himself on the grass, ringing a bell. Had no transac-
tion with him after the 22d. The bill now pro-
duced he took from Mr. Baker on the 230,. knowing
him to be insane. The bill was. drawn in pre-
sence of his daughter. Did, not draw the . bill,
bUt directed the amount, Which consisted of, the
price of the picture, the expence of bringing it,down.
and a pound each., The painting was executed. by
.witness,
Mr. Backler, who was a tenant of the .
and the painting was placed on his premises, °I! °
for him.
fiilleenrdelywausn
ldvenrsttadnudei ;loge b
Mr. Beacdkiipspros:od,
tohje.
witness
s si
The contract entered'into on the preceding Satur-
day by Baker and the witness was abandoned. The
money to be'received for the .picture was to be ap-
plied in discharge of Ms
nro. B
proof
sin s a account.rly,
or Fencing
and quotingpoetry wa
recollected one of his Majesty's Judges who was very
fond of amusing himself with both in an ef_travagant
manner.
raockfle ofr
Sophia Levi, mother of the plaintiff, was in the
shop when her son and Mr. Baker came into it, and
heard Baker say he would take the gold chain he
had seen at Sidmouth, and asked to see several
other articles. There were diamonds shown, for
which three hundred guineas were demanded, and
for which Baker offered 2001., but subsequently
took them for the price named.
Lionel Joseph, a jeweller at Bristol, sold to the
plaintiff a gold repeating wateh,.a.brilliant ring, and
a brilliant cross, in Mara,. l 82d. The watch had
belonged
.to a Baronet, and his crest was- on it.
Seventy guineas was a reasonable price forit. The
brilliant cross was worth more than forty..guirieas now.
Cross-examined... Warms is a brother-in-law of

Ate Tho bigilUtis w•rt worth SOUL ;
thorn big brother for 2001.

'William Flood, Esq., a partner of the West of
England Bank, proved that a cheque of the plaintiff
was presented at his house, and refused payment for
want of funds. Cautioned the clerks not to ad-
vance any money on the account, in consequence of
seeing the defendant acting on the Monday like a
madman in the street.
The plaintiff's case having been closed,
Mr. Sergeant MEREWETHER addressed the Jury
for the defence. He said that according to the law
of England a person of unsound mind could neither
be held accountable for a criminal act, or be made
responsible in a civil suit. The evidence of the plain-
tiff went to show that transactions took place be-
' tween him and the defendant on the 17th, 18th, and
ifeth of April : but by what description of persons
was that evidence given ? By none, but those of the
plaintiff's own family—by his father, his mother, or
his servant. The insanity of the defendant was un-
happily, a question put beyond a doubt.
Chief Justice BEST.—We have heard enough to
establish that; but the doubt on my mind is, can
yeti allege you- wn insanity ?
Mr. Serg. 31.EwrrurIt made no doubt of bring-
ing to the plaintiff a knowledge of the defendant's
insanity. It was a matter of public notoriety in the
tewn ; no person living in Exeter could pretend to
ran ignorance of the defendant's proceedings. Evi-
dence was given of a payment of money on the even-
ing of the Saturday, when he would have it in his
power to show that the defendant gave the most de-
cided proofs of madness in ordering more than five
thousand pounds' worth of goods, which, of course,
the plaintiff would not think of executing, content
with getting so large a portion of his ready money
by the bills on Worcester. There was. evidence,
however, to be produced, which would detail a great
deal of that which had been advanced, so far as time
was concerned. The waiters at the London Inn,
where the defendant was staying, would prove that
he was in the hotel at the hour in which the plain-
tiff made him dealing for plate at his house on
the Saturday night. As to the receipt of the
money, it was quite ridiculous to assert; for not
only was no part of the sum of 6001. traced to
or from the unfortunate gentleman, but the
very morning after it was stated he received so
large a sum, he had to borrow 81. from the landlord
of the inn. The other parts of the plaintiff's case
were of the same description. In what way did
Marsh's evidence support itr Did he show that the
man's actions were those of a reasonable being ? The
testimony of Mr. Bacon was still more decided against
the defendant's sanity. However much he regretted
to speak harshly of a. gentleman of Mr. Bacon's ap-
parent respectability, he was obliged to say that the
acts of extravagance—the wanting to pull down a
part of his premises before the purchase was com-
pleted—his readiness to officiate as Chaplain at fa-
mily prayers—his quoting poetry, and fencing at the
house of a stranger—were all sufficient indications
of the wandering of his mind, to convince a man less
reflective than Mr. Bacon appeared to be. The con-
duct of Mr. Bacon, with regard to the picture trans-
action, was too strong for him to enter upon ; it
formed no part of his ease, but it was quite sufficient
to show how far Mr. Bacon's opinion of his sanity
tallied with the use he converted his imbecility
to. Having disposed of the ease attempted to be
set up by the plaintiff, it remained for him to lay
before the Jury the matter of the evidence which
he intended to call in proof of the state of the
unhappy defendant's mind. He was in the cus-
tom, at Cheltenham, of having his carriage driven
to houses of bad reputation, and even having his
daughter kept waiting for him in the carriage while
he visited these houses. His next act was to leave
Cheltenham, without 'giving notice to his family ;
-and the only way his servants could discover wh-re
he was, was by tracing him to Sidmouth, by the
noise he made along the road with bugles, triangles,
and a drum, which he carried with him in the car-
riage. The unhappy man's extravagance did not
confine itself to words, for painful as it was to him
to state the fact, the unhappy defendant would be
found to have twice forced off all his clothes in the
carriage, in the open day, to Sidmouth. He also
bought a pair of horses, which he saw on the road,
and gave a cheque for them at the price first asked.
He made the horse-dealer go with him to Sidmouth,
and actually proposed to a woman of the name of
Raymond, whom he brought down with him, to in-
troduce her to his own daughter, as the wife of the
herse-dealer ; but the woman had the decency to
refuse it. He left Sidmouth after staying there but
ten days; took his servant with him in his gig, and
turned him out on the road, after taking him sixteen
miles. On the Wednesday after that he sent for a
tailor to make him some clothes, and produced a
horse's tail, recommending him to use it in future
as his measure. On the Thursday he brought two
women of ill character to his house, where his
daughter was staying; but that young lady imme-
hately left it. He, however, continued to patro-
ls (those women, and walked about in all Aub-
e pieces. The unhappy gentleman is next found
the London Inn, at Exeter, giving a din-
ler to a number of tradesmen, ordering them
?pensive wines and fruit, and on his return to
dmouth taking the women with him in his carriage.
if i *next journey was to Tiverton with some women,
bu tno sooner had he arrived there than he deter-

fined to come back again. He fell asleep in his
rig while driving, and the woman who was with
him in it was obliged to take the reins and drive to
town. In the evening he gave another treat to the
tradesmen, and paid cheques to several, who took
that opportunity to enforce their claims. He had
now brought the unfortunate gentleman down to the
lay when he first became acquainted with the plain-
t' T. the Wedri?say so much referred to. He came
to the London on that-day, and conducted him-
self with the greatest extravagance, dancing, sing-
ing, and shouting; but on the Saturday following,
when it is alleged that he received the money, and
gave the large order for goods, his conduct was pm.-
tieularly outrageous. He went to a Mr. Tucker's,
Ind offered to purchase his house and goods—offered
aim 1,2004., and then 4,0001. He then went to Mr.
Bacon, and after he left that gentleman stripped himself
again stark naked,and called for the maid servants to see
\um. These circumstances, the Jury would doubtless be
f opinion, were sufficient to make out the insanity •
but it was further necessary that the knowledge of
it should be brought home to the plaintiff. The
16th of August was the day in which Levi first be-
same acquainted with him, and on the very day
after, Levi and his wife were taken down to Sid-
youth by him, and they were there seen walking
•DOut with Mr. Baker, as if they were all people of
qual rank. He did not consider the ordinary wine
t table as good enough for Mr. and Mrs Levi, and
le ordered for them other wine of the most costly
tosseription, and said that nothing could be too good
This friend and his good lady. Though he was
buying a watch from Levi, he insisted on
making him a present of the watch he wore. The
following night, Levi is seen carousing with the
other tradesmen at the London Inn, at the
,xpense of the defendant, and almost exclu-
sively holding him in conversation. Levi asked
him to breakfast the next day, as lie appeared to
have grown quite audacious in his familiarity; and
an that day, Friday, Levi was seen at the
tank, dictating a letter to the defendant's
stockbroker, and actually instructing him how
to get 1,0001. of his own property sold out.
Artill not all this sufficient to make Levi acquainted
with the state of the plaintiff's mind ? But we
shall show further, that at the bank he himself ad-
mitted that he did not think that Baker knew what
"ma about. He would call the evidence, of
which he had thus given an outline, and leave the
tse with the utmost confidence in the hands of the

The inquisition and commission of lunacy were
offered to be put in, but, at the suggestion of the
Vourt, they were withdrawn.
The following 'witnesses were then called for the
Aefence

Mr. Thomas Scott, toothet-io-kw of Mr. Baker,

proved that Mr. Baker was a surgeon, retired from
business, living in Worcestershire, having previously
practised in London. He was a matt in every re-
spect exemplary in his conduct and morals. Soon
after the death of his wife, a difference was percepti-
ble in his conduct. Medical advice was called in.
He was confined to the house three months. He
had a fit of apoplexy. The effect on his mind wan
to change him from being an open generous man, to
make him close and penurious, and to fancy that he
could not afford a glass of wine, or any nourishment.
Saw him at Cheltenham in June, last year. Saw
Levi on the subject of the claim in October.
Among other things Levi said, with respect to the ad-
vance of the 6001. that Mr. Baker came to him
after the Sabbath, and that he said, I see you
lend money—l shall want a thousand pounds ;
to which Levi replied he had 'Mt to truth, but what
he had he would be Welcome to. That he sent down
stairs for MOriey, and that 4001. was lent to him ;
that more being wanted, he sent to his father for
200/., which he got in 200 sovereigns in a bag.—
That Baker counted the notes, and put the whole in
his pocket. Witness stated hoar many of the articles
charged in the bill were found after him, and Levi
said he had delivered the other articles to Mr. Ba-
ker personally, on the Saturday night. That he went
with Mr. Baker to the corner of Castle-street, where
Baker left him, saying, Levi, you must excuse me, I
am going to call On a lady. Levi also stated that lie
had received a cheque for 6001. Miss Baker was of
age last February. Thp son is seventeen. Miss
Baker has not been in society. Mr. Anstace was
not the attorney of Mt, Baker. Went to Bridgewater
to subpcena Mr. Anstace, but that gentleman was too
ill to travel.

William Allan was servant to Mr. Baker. Mr.
Baker after Christmas 1825, changed his manner to
his horses, lie was before kind, but he then used
them severely, and drove them furiously. Went with
him to Cheltenham. Mr. Baker went to a hotel,
but he conducted himself in an extraordinary man-
ner, getting up at three or four in the morning to
drive out. He returned from the drive at all hours
of the day and sometimes not bringing home his
horse or his stanhope. Knew the woman Bennett
at Cheltenham. She was a woman of the town.—
Recollected Mr. Baker leaving Cheltenham in the
carriage. He ordered witness to take the stanhope
and four horses to the Full Moon at Bristol. Went
to the Full Moon but found no directions there; then
followed Mr. Baker in his carriage to Sidmouth.—
Heard on the, way that Mr. Baker went through

the county with tambourines mid music. Mr. Baker
was at the Sidenouth races on the 9th of August.
Heard him invite Mr. Marsh and his family to dinner
on the following day. Mr. Baker went out the next
day to ride on his white horse, and a crowd collected
in the street to see him ride. Was sent by Mr.
Baker the next day to Mr. Tucker for a box of
things. It was full of broken pieces of window
frame, and all sorts of trash. Mr. Baker desired
witness to call on the woman Raymond to take her
up in the gig, and touch his hat to her as she went
into it, and to say to her, Madam, have you any
orders for me ? The witness described several
scenes of Mr. Baker's eccentricity on the road as
already detailed in the statement of the defence.
Robert Chamberlain, waiter at the London Inn,
recollected Mr. Baker and his daughter coming to
the house on the 3d of August. At first he seemed
very kind to his daughter, but his conduct towards
her occasionally changed to great severity. Recol-
lects Tucker, a carver and gilder ;:Roberts, a keeper
of the bazaar, and several other persons of the same
description were there. Levi, the plaintiff, was
amongst the number. Levi's health was given.
When Levi came into the room, Mr. Baker rose up
to shake hands with him, -expressed his pleasure at
seeing him, and presented him to the other trades-
men. Mr. Baker then ordered a fresh supply of ,
wine, and a dozen pair of wax candles. The wines
were Sauterne, Hock, and Madeira. They had pine-
apples and a regular dessert, but when Levi came in
a further supply was ordered. Mr. Baker's coat and
shirt frill were open. He asked Levi several times
how his pretty wife was. Took a watch out of his
pocket, saying, here, Levi, take this, it is of no use
to me. Mr. Baker and Levi then conversed in whis-
pers. Heard Levi ask Mr. Baker to come to break-
fast with him next morning. The company were
standing up often to give healths. Recollects Mr.
Austin coming in when Levi's health was in the
course of drinking►. The company soon after sepa-
rated. It was evident from Mr. Baker's conduct for

the whole of the evening that he was insane. On
the Saturday Mr. Baker ordered dinner for six
o'clock, but he did not come till after eight, and
when he came in he did not go out again between
that hour and ten. Heard Mrs. Levi's health often
drunk during the evening. \Vas quite certain that
Mr. Baker was not out of the house between half-
past eight and ten on the Saturday. Thought that
Mr. Baker was mad, and every body must have
thought the same—said so to Mr. Tucker. Wit-
ness thought him mad from the first moment he came
into the house.

Mr. Mather, a clerk in the West of England Bank,
deposed to the agitation and eccentricity of Mr.
Baker when he and Levi came in for the purpose of
inquiring about the transfer of stock. Mr. Baker
attempted to write a letter, but destroyed a sheet of
paper. Levi then dictated a letter, and looked over
Mr. Baker as he wrote. The letter produced is that
letter. Told Levi that he was sure the money would
not be paid, from his eccentric manner; but Levi
said he was sure it would, as he had inquired about
Mr. Baker, and that he was a man of fortune. Levi
told him in the evening of what had passed with
Mr. Baker at the London Inn, when he ordered
twelve wax candles. Witness said he must be of
unsound mind : but Levi replied it was only attribu-
table to drink.

Mr. Sergt.WILDE did not feel that the knowledge
of insanity was as yet brought home to hisclient.
CHIEF JUSTICE—Then in that case I will adjourn
till to-morrow. Let the witnesses Levi, Marsh, and
Bacon be in attendance ; I want to see them again.
Let them be called in and be subpoenaed now.
The order for adjournment was about to be given,
but in consequence of an observation of the de-
fendant's Counsel,

The CHIEF JUSTICE said I may be wrong; but I
have advised the defendant's Counsel to atop. They
have proved enough.
Mr. Sergeant "TILDE then rose to reply to evi-
dence, and maintained that he did not open the case
with a denial of Mr. Baker's insanity, but a denial
that the plaintiff had reason to be acquainted with it.
The CHIEF JUSTICE, in summing up, declared
that a case of greater malignity seldom came before
him. He commented in the severest terms on the
conduct of the plaintiff, and on the testimony of the
several witnesses he produced. He considered that
sufficient proof was not given of the delivery of the
money or of the goods; and as to the denial of the
plaintiff that he did not know the state of the de-
fendant, it was ridiculous to maintain. The evi-
dence of the waiter at the -inn, and that of the
banker's clerk, decided that point. He would first
put it to the Jury whether they believed that goods
beyond the value of SW. were delivered.
The Jury, after a few minutes' deliberation, found
that goods to the amount of 851. only were delivered,
and gave a verdict generally for the defendant.
Mr. Sergeant 'WILDE said he would prefer a Non-
suit, which was entered accordingly.

The CHIEF JUSTICE then called for the witnesses
of the plaintiff both from Exeter and Sidmouth, and
required to know from the defendant's Counsel
whether they would enter into recognizance to pro-
secute, for a conspiracy to defraud, as he was of opi-
nion that sufficient ground was laid for such a pro-
ceeding ?
The Counsel for the defendant having intimated
his willingness to pursue any course recommended
by the Court,
The CHIEF JUSTICE ordered the plaintiff, wbo
was in Court, to be committed at once, and warrants
to be issued against the other witness which he
pointed out.
Bail was subsequently admitted for Levi, himself
in 1001., and two sureties in 501. each.

FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE.

FRENCH PAPERS.

(From the Gazette de France, of Saturday, Aug. 11.)

PARIS, Ace. 11.—The King has, this morning,
honoured with a visit the Exhibition of the Produc-
tions of the French Manufactures. His Majesty
examined, in the minutest manner, the magnificent
assemblage of productions of our arts and manufac-
tures. He condescended to stop at a great number
of objects, and to leaf: the exhibitors to enter into
explanation concerning them, which he listened to
with the greatest kindness. The questions asked
by the King testify the lively and enlightened inte-
rest which his Majesty takes in the French manu-
factures. The:fear of omitting in a first notice some
valuable particulars obliges us to put off till to-
morrow the account which we intend to give of this
visit, which will be held in eternal remembrance by
the manufacturers of France.

His Majesty, after leaving the Camp at St. Omer,
will visit the fortresses of the Northern Departments.
The Journal of Dunkirk adds, that the Ministers of
War and of the Interior, and several great Noblemen
of the Court, will accompany his Majesty.
Letters from Alexandria of 6th June say, that the
Pacha of Egypt intends to contract in Europe a loan
of four millions of Spanish piastres, to be guaranteed
by the Porte, and to be repaid in four years, in four
equal payments.
Letters from Rome say, that the artists and
pupils, natives of the Kingdom of the Netherlands,
have celebrated by a fete the happy conclusion of
the Concordat. The event has caused general joy
in the Netherlands also, and if it has not yet openly
manifested itself, it is because people wait for the
publication of it, to celebrate it in a suitable manner.
We know that preparations are already making for
illuminations as soon as it shall be published.

(From the ConstitutionncL)
MR. CANNING'S DEATH.

PARIS, Auc. 9.—The hopes which have been
hitherto cherished have, unfortunately been dissipat-
ed. A telegraphic despatch from Calais announces,
that Mr. Canning died at Chiswick, on the Bth of
August, at ten minutes before four o'clock. This
lamentable news has also reached Lord Granville,
Ambassador of Great Britain.

The English Journals, arrived by express, contain
most interesting details of the illness of the illustrious
deceased, and of the general sorrow at present felt.
All England is plunged in profound grief.
This event has produced in Paris a sensation,
whie!i will be shared by all nations both of the Old
and the New World. It is a just cause for a nation's
pride to see all-others lament the death of one of its
Statesmen. All the interests of humanity have be
come fixed on one point. There are some sympa-
thies so powerful that the spirit of rivalry itself can-
not weaken them. We live in times when the loss
of a Minister, friendly to liberal institutions, is a
cause of sorrow to all generous hearts.

(From the Quotidienne.)
PARIS, AUG. 9.—This great political event must
necessarily have a great influence over England,
and indeed Europe. Mr. Canning having disap-
peared, the Royal confidence cannot be placed in any
of the individuals alluded to by the Times, as these
are at the head of a system of their own. Will the
King place confidence in Lord Lansdowne or Hol-
land? It is impossible. A new Cabinet, then, must be
formed, I do not say upon entirely Tory principles.
but at any rate upon those of Lord Liverpool's Ad-
ministration. It is to be hoped that England has
no longer to dread the visionary projects of Parlia-
mentary Reform, or any other of the notions which,
sooner or later, radicalism would have endeavoured
to carry into effect. With regard to Europe the
consequences are immense. The fascination of his
talents, and the activity of his mind, rendered Mr.
Canning a most dangerous man. Being under the
guidance of Whigs, he was no longer himself, and
would have advanced the cause of radicalism--a
cause, great God ! which is that of revolutions.
On all points the policy of England affects Europe,
which is the reason why it cannot be indifferent to
legitimate Governments that the Satesmen, whom
the liberalism of the universe acknowledged as its
head, is no longer at the head of public affairs.

(PRIVATE CORRESPONDENCE.)

MADRID, JULY 30.—The departure of the Duke
de San Carlos is now talked of. The choice made
by the French Government of an Ambassador to
our Court has, no doubt, given rise to the report;
but I can safely say, that no preparations to warrant
it have yet taken place. It is asserted, that Go-
vernment proposed to his Excellency to buy a beau-
tiful hotel in Paris for his residence, and that the
Duke replied, that he had rather live in a less style,
and not be so great an exoence to his country.
It is said that several Captains-General of Pro-
vinces will be superseded, but nothing certain is yet
known upon the subject.
The Count D'Espagne is expected at the Royal
residence on the 4th, on his return from the Army
of Observation, as I before announced. He has re-
viewed the infantry of the guard. The letters we
have received announce no movement among the
troops.
The heat, which has been as high as 32 degrees,
has occasioned some serious disorders, under which
several have already sunk.
Letters from Gibraltar say, that a division of
English ships of war sailed on the 15th inst. for the
Levant.

it is alleged, to give time to the members for mature
deliberation.
LATEST FROM GUAYAQUIL.

Extract of a letter from Guayaquil, dated April
18 :—On the nights of the 15th and 16th instant, a
revolution against Peres, and all the officers acting
under the extraordinary powers of Bolivar, was effect-
ed; and they, and ail the chiefs, who have not sent
in their adhesion to the new authorities, have em-
barked on board a brig of war, and will be, to-day,
transferred to a transport, and sail for Panama.
General Lamar has been chosen by the munici-
pal authorities as political and military chief ; and
Colonel Elezalde, who was at the head of the revo-
lution, has been appointed " Commandant des
Armas." Lamar is a very popular, and what is
more in politicians, a very honest and good man.
The deposed chiefs are fully of opinion that it is the
intention of the party now in power here, to annex
the whole southern department of Colombia to
Peru. Such is not believed by others to be their
present intention; but circumstances may induce
them to adopt such a measure.

FAKES OF STOCKS THIS
Bank Stock 21W, IM4
3 per Cent. Red. 819404
3 per Cent. Cons.... 88% %%
35¢ per Cont.
Ditto Red. 95'74
4. per Cent. New lOl% 2
Ditto, 1825 ........ 105 3
Bank L. Ann. 205i3!4
1 ndi4
Ditto 1;ond.

PRICES OF FOREIGN FUNDS
Austrian Bonds, 5 percent.
Brazilian Bonds 67
Buenos Ayres Bonds.
Chilian Bonds, 6 per at —
Colombian Bonds
Ditto, 1824 IIIAI4
Danish, 3 per cent. 63%
Greek Bonds
Ditto, 1826
Guatimala
Mexican Bonds
Do. 1825 (3,N

DAT AT ONE O'CLOCK.
Paid. Per Share
Anglo Mexican Mining Co.
Brazilian Mining Co. 2O 35
General Mining Association 5 7%
Potosi La Paz and Peruvian Assoc a .f.l 8

/McKay AUG. 10.
St. Patrick Insur. (per eh.)
Royal Irish Ditto
National Ditto
Patriotic Ditto
Hibernian Bank
Provincial Ditto
Royal Irish Mine
Imperial Mine
Mining Co. of Ireland
Commercial Buildings