The Sun.
London, England, 1820-08-30 00:00:00

In what part of Italy dues the witness live %.

At Varriesa.
What business is the witness ?—A mason.
Was the witness employed -to work at the
Villa D'FittelYes ; I was master mason.
flow many men had witness under him ?
Twetity-live—the umubers varied. •.
While the 'witness was there, did you see the
Princes and Bergamr?—l did upon. their return
from Villa Villas. . I saw them on the Lake at
the Villa D'Este.
Did the witness ever see them in a canoe
there I—Yes, I saw them alone there more than
'4 /vice.

Did the witness ever see them in the garden
`together, alone ?—Yes, several tittles. On one
vccasion I saw the Princess sitting in a chair
which had wheels, and the Baron was behind
pushing the chair.
A fter this did the witness see any body else
in that chair ?—No.
Were they alone at the time ?—The Princess
and Bergami were alone.
Did the witness ever see the Baron get into the
•hair ?—I have, and the Princess was behind the
shair pushing it along.
Were they alone at that time ?—Yes, Verona
same and brought the chair, and then the Prin-
cuss and Bergami remained together.
In what manner did the witness see the Pllll-
- and Bergami usually walking together In the
garden ?—Was it separate or together ?—lt was
,arm in arm.

How often did the witness see them walking
together arm in arm ?—More than three times.

:Does the witness remember being at work iu a
grotto in the garden i—Yes.

What sort of work was the witness doing in
'kat grotto was making a cornice to a round
room.

-Was there a room adjoining to that round
rotan?—There was.

While at work in that round room did the wit-
rsiss hear anybody in the adjoining room ?—Yes,
1 heard somebody enter.
What did the witness hear after that ?—I beard
somebody come into the room, and I came down
from the scaffold on which I was working to see
who it was. I saw it was the Princess and Her-
gami.

- Were there any figures in that room into which
the Princess and Bergami came ?—There were
two figures of Adam and Eve : the figure of Adam
had a fig-leaf.
Had that of Eve also a f;g-leaf ?—it had.

How were thogo fig-leaves fastened on ?—The
;tncris said they were so attached by a wire that
they could be turned aside.
What did the Princess and Bergami do?—
Tey looked at the figures and laughed.
Was that all ?—They put the fig-leaves aside
to see what was underneath.

Where were you all this time ?—I was behind
a pilaster : when I saw them coming towards me
I re-mounted my scaffold, and went to work

again.
What sort of opening was there between the
round room where you were at work and the
room where the figures were ?—There was a cor-
ridore between the two rooms, and in the middle
of that corridore was the pillaster, behind which
I stood and saw the Princess and Bergami.
When they removed the leaves in the manner
you have described, what did the Princess and
Bergami do ?—They, talked together, and looked
sometimes at one figure and sometimes at the
other.

Did the witness remember an entertainment at
the Villa D'Este; on St. Bartholomew's day ?
do.
At what hour after the witness had left the
YilJa D'Este did he go home I—At about half-
past twelve or half-past one.
Does the Piazza form part of the Villa D'Este ?
—lt does. Immediately after the Villa D'Este
there is a garden, at the end of which there is a
walk, and then the Piazza.
Does the witness know a person of the name
of Dominico Bruzzi ?—I do.

When the witness was going to the place de-
scribed, who was with him ?—Dominico Bruzzi.

At what hour was it that the witness went
through the garden at Villa D'Este with Bruzzi ?
—About half past one o'clock.

A 9uestion ,arose as to whether this was the
Italian or English time, when it was determined
by the interpreters that it was half-past nine
o'clock at night, according to the English mode
of computing time.
When passing through the garden did the
witness see the Princess and Bergami together ?
Yes ; they were sitting on a bench at the end of
th e walk.

Did the witness ever see the Princess and Ber-
gami perform together at the Theatre at the Villa
D'Este ?—Yes, have.

What characters did they perform ?—The
Princess performed the part of a sick woman, and
Bergami that of a Physician.
(Here the examination in chief terminated.)
The witness was then cross-examined by Dr.
LUSHINGTON. _ .

Was the witness ever examined before I—At
Milan, inlslS.
Does the witness know Col. Brown ?—No.

What made the witness go to Milan to be ex-
amined ?—The Government sent for me to be
e;amined before the police
Who did they send ?—Razsalli, a courier.
Did the witness ever kuow him before :—Yes,
at the Villa d'Es(e.

Though the concessions made to her MAJES-
TY'S Counsel are contrary to precedent, yet as
truth and justice are the only objects of the
Trial, the friends to truth and justice must re-
joice that all possible latitude is given to her
MAJESTY and her Legal Advisers to disprove
the evidence against her. The Morning Chro-
nicle of this day, speaking of the power which
has been granted to her M AJESTY'S Advocates of
a re-examination of witnesses to the full extent of
their requisitions, says, " thus Justice and the
powerful eloquence of Messrs. BROUGHAM and
DENmAN have triumphed over the Law of the

' Loan CHANCELLOR." This invidious and insi-
dious manner of stating the matter is exactly in
' character with that engine of Party.--It is not
merely " the Law of the Logo CnAsceLton"
that has thus been Set aside, but the Law of
,the
Land, as admittsel ttWd supported byiht Judges.
If " Carl:kris of kavvfeoottrlid'
look one side, and the LORD CHANCELLOR an-
other," as. The Cgronick also says, it was not
because the tWo Noble Lora doubted the in-
terpretation of the Law, as given by the Loan
CHANCELLOR, bnt because they thoaght that
in a case of such importance it might be pro-
per, in order to obviate all complaints of a want
of due indulgence to Tau Quint's Counsel in any
.matter that might be conducive to her vindica-
tion. It was surely proper In the LORD CHAN-
CELLOR, being at the head of the Law, to sup-
port the Law to the utmost of his poWer, but the
other Noble Lords might deem it necessary to
act upon principles of general.policy In a case of
so peculiar and unprecedented a nature, and
which is never likely to happen again, as due
care will, no doubt, be taken, on the final termi-
nation of this disastrous business, to pass such a
Law as will fully meet such a case if it should in-
deed occur. We still look for some Master mind to
act with vigour, and endeavour to put an end to
proceedings which are pregnant with mischief,
Moral and Political. If, as we have before said,
the evidence can be disproved, let the QUEEN'S
Counsel bring forward proofs against the
characters of the Witnesses, but not waste the
time of the Legislature, and obstruct the busi-
ness of the Nation, by questions, that it is not
possible to render subservient to the ends of
truth and justice. We yesterday observed
that Mr. BROUGHAM'S Inquiry of BARBARA,
CrtAxTz, where she now lives, could not tend
to any good purpose, but was rather calcu-
lated to have a different effect. The Learned
Counsel must have known where she resided, and
if he did not, the information was not necessary
to the Illustration of any point of substantial jus-
tice. We appeal to the common sense of man-
kind, whether such questions as the following,
addressed by Mr. BROUGHAM to this female wit-
ness, can forward any useful purpose, and are not
absolutely wasting time.
4. Where do you lire now?