The Sun.
London, England, 1845-07-09 00:00:00

Price.

X s, d.
Si. 100 0 0
Si. 46 13 4
21. 10s. 100 0 0
..... 51. per cent. 100 0 0
. 41.165. pr et. 63 12 9

East London •••• • ..
Grand Junction ......
Kent• • • • • - • .
Vauxhall ....
West Middlesex ...

CANALS.
.
.n.
Names of 1 Dividend Names of A Dividend
Companies. A per Companies. 21 Annum
Price. Names r-, per .
Price.
:
rn 1 Annum.' I)
-- ! ---
,
£ , £
Ashtn& 0161 h 97 51.55. p c 72 Monmouthsh 100 91. 160
Ashby-d-la-Zlll3 4/. 70 Mntgomrysh 100 51. 98
Barnsley.. ..1160 12/. 180 Macclesfield . 100 - 15
Basingstoke.. 100, - 5 Neath .. .. • • 100 201. 365
Brknk&Abrg 150, Si. 85 Nottingham . 150 121. 260
Cromford .. • •
,100 18/. 160 Peak Forest .78 3/. 40
Dudley, .. •. • • 'loo', 4/. 80 Regent's .. . • 33 1/. 244
Derby •• • • -100 81. 103 Rochdale ... •85 41. 54
Ellsmre&Chsll33l 4/. 58 Shropshire • • 125 Si. 120
Erewash . • .1100 321. 440 Somrset Coal 150 71. 10s. 123
Forth & Clyd,loo 4/. 105 Do.Lk Fil St 12 6/. p. c. 11
GrandJunctn 100 71. 124 Stffrd &Wore 140 281. 440
Grand Union 100 1/. 10s. 25 Shrewsbury.. 12, 151. 230
Glamorgnsh . 172 13%1. 210 Stourbridge .. 145 201. 360
Olstr & Brklyi 00 - j 8 Strtfrd on Av 79 1/. 10s. 27
Grantham • .1150 12/. 100 Severn and I 26 11. Bs. 29
Huddersfield. 57 - 20 Wye Rail.
Kennt & Avn 39 7s. 63. 7 Trnt 8c Mr-1 50 30/. 445
Lancaster ... • 471 11. 10. 40 sey, IA sh. 10
Leeds& Livrp' 100 341. 560 Thams &Med 19 - 50
Leicester .... 140 10/. j 105 Worcstr & I
78 4/.
Leicstr & Nth 83 4/. I 60 Binning. 11
Loughborogh,l42 701. :1050 Wilts & Biks 67 11. 4s,

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT OF EXCHEQUER, July 8.
( Nisi Prius Sittings in London, before the LORD CHIEF BARON
and Special Juries. )
ANSTED AND OTHERS V. ARNETT.
The plaintiffs are eminent merchants in the City. The de-
fendant is a well-known Custom- house agent, and the action
was brought to recover 1811. from the defendant, which the
plaintiffs alleged had been paid by them to a former confidential
clerk of theirs, who committed suicide in 1841, and by him to
the defendant for clearing from the Custom-house a certain
quantity of goods belonging to them, which, however, were
removed without the payment of duty, and the duty on which
the plaintiffs were afterwards obliged to pay over again. After
a great deal of evidence had been gone into, the Lord Chief
Baron recommended the case to be referred, as it was impos-
sible for a jury to do justice between the parties.
HAYW'OOD V. 31'DOWALL.
Mr. Sergeant Taltourd, Mr. Knowles, and Mr. Flood, ap-
peared for the plaintiff; Mr. Martin for the defendant.
This action was brought nominally for a fortnight's wages,
but in reality to determine between the master printers and
the compositors of the metropolis two points—first, whether
according to the custom of the trade a fortnight's notice is
necessary to determine the contract of service on either side,
and, secondly, whether Parliamentary " appeal eases" should
be paid for at the rate of Bd. or of 7d. per thousand letters.
At the commencement of the case, Mr. MARTIN said he did
not intend to dispute the first point, and would, therefore,
admit that the plaintiff was entitled to a fortnight's notice be-
fore he was discharged.
The only question, therefore, now to be determined was the
rate of payment.
The defendant is the well known printer, carrying on busi-
ness in Pemberton-row, Gough-square. The plaintiff is a
compositor. The defendant is honorary secretary to the
Master Printers' Association. The plaintiff is supported by
the body of London compositors. In January last the
defendant, who had not before had much Parliamentary
business, got an order to print an appeal case, " Ranger v. the
Great Western Railway Company." As all business done
before Parliament, or in connexion with it, is paid for at a
higher rate than business done elsewhere, compositors charge
more for Parliamentary than other work, and require Bd. per
thousand for " appeal cases." 4 Thej defendant offered only
7d. per thousand. This ‘4the companionship," i.e. the body
of compositors in the defendant's employment, for this kind of
business refused to take. Though there was plenty of other
work in the office, the defendant ould not give any employ-
ment to them, and they thereupon gave him a fortnight's no-
tice to leave. During this fortnight they were wholly unem.
ployed, and this action was brought by one of them for about
41., the snm which, on the average, he would be supposed
likely to make by piecework during the fortnight he was so
employed.
After a few witnesses had been examined for the plaintiff, the
case was adjourned till to-morrow.

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT.
OLD COURT.
(Before the RECORDER.)
Mary Anne Salisbury, alias Salisbury, who pleaded
guilty to three charges of larceny at the May session,
but whose sentence was respited, was brought up for
judgment.
It will be recollected that the prisoner, when before
the magistrate, told a rather romantic story about her
having been seduced by a gentleman who brought her
to London, and then deserted her, the whole of which
statement turned out to be a fabrication.
The RECORDER sentenced her to six months' impri-
sonment, to commence from the period of her conviction.