The Sun.
London, England, 1842-12-12 00:00:00

THE QUEEN V. GORDON.

This case occupied the greater part of the day, and
was not concluded till after seven at night. It was an
indictment against the defendant, charging bim with
having committed wilful and corrupt perjury, and it
went on to allege that the defendant had caused an
execution to be issued against the prosecutor without
having first served him with the different processes
which are requisite to entitle a party to issue an exe-
cution against another, and that he had gone to the
different offices, and himself made affidavits, and in-
duced other persons to swear as to the service, &c., of
writs, notices of declaration, judgments, and all other
things which are in such cases required. Evidence
was adduced to show that the proceedings had not
taken place, and that the defendant had improperly
Obtained his execution, which he had so issued.
Lord DENMAN summed up, and the Jury returned
a verdict of " Guilty."
The defendant will be brought up for judgment
next terms.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Dec. 10.
WELSHIBE V. BROWN.
(Continued from our Afternoon Edition of Saturday.)
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL, in an address of two
two hours' duration, commented very strongly on the
fact of the deceased having referred the office to a com-
parative stranger as his medical attendant, inasmuch
as that gentleman had admitted that he had not seen
him more than three times, when there had been a
gentleman, a Dr. Hawkins, who resided at Hitchin,
in constant professional attendance upon him for
some years prior and subsequent to the policy having
been effected. He was in a position to prove that
not only Dr. Hawkins considered him to be in a state
of incipient consumption as far back as 1837, but that
the deceased had eventually died of that disease. Dr.
Hawkins, too, would state, that had he been referred
to by the office he should have declined to give a cer-
tificate to the effect that it was an insurable life.
Farther than this, he should call Sir James Clarke,
to whom the deceased had gone in October, 1837,
who would tell the Jury that it was his custom to
make a memoranda of all cases of a consumptive
character which came under his notice, and that on
referring to his book wherein those memoranda were
recorded, he found several in respect of the case of the
deceased, which case he had considered as of that
nature.

Dr. Hawkins was then examined, and in the most
distinct manner proved that since October, 1837, he
had, except when the deceased had been abroad by his
advice, been in constant attendance on him ; that his
disease had been consumption, and that he had died
thereof.

The ATTORNEY-GENERAL now said that he was un-
willing to keep up the case longer than was necessary.
After the testimony which had been given by, Dr.
Hawkins, it was impossible that he on the part of the
plaintiff could contend that Dr. James Johnson had
been the usual medical attendant of the deceased.
Lord ABINGER thereupon directed the Jury to find
a verdict for the defendants on that particular count,
and also on the money count of non assumpsit.
The Jury returned a verdict accordingly for the
defendant.

The Court was crowded throughout the day, and the
trial lasted from the sitting of the Court till a late hour.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY 7 Dec. 10.

IN THE BANKRUPTCY OF LORD HUNTINGTOWER.
The examination of witnesses in this case was
resumed to-day, and it will be seen that the Learned
Commissioner expressed his belief that the publicity
given to the lengthened examinations would not only
do good to the public, but eventually to Lord Hun-
tingtower himself.
Mr. Humfrey attended for the witness under
examination.
Mr. Samuel B. Hamer, examined by Mr. Nias.
This witness stated that he lived at No. 32, Saville-
row, and had delivered in his bill of costs to Messrs.
Bowers and Back, containing a detail of his transac-
tions. He had not produced his books, bills of ex-
change, or notes and securities received from the
bankrupt, according to his summons, but was ordered
so to do by Mr. Commissioner Fonblanque.- The
examination was then resumed,
What bills of exchange have you received from the
bankrupt?—l do not remember.
How many do they number ?—I do not remember,
but only one of them was paid for 601.
To what amount in the whole have you received
bills of exchange from the bankrupt ?—I do not re-
member.
What has become of the bills of exchange which you
did receive from the bankrupt ?—That I do not know.
What has become of any part of them ?—I think
that one bill of exchange is in the hands of Mr. Price,
of Chancery-lane, auctioneer I believe, for 600/. ;
another in the hands of Mr. Nicholls, of Buckingham-
street, Strand; he was, I do not know now. I believe
he calls himself a bill discounter, and that was for
1251. lam not aware of any other.
Did you give any and what consideration for those
bills to the bankrupt ?—Yes, for the 60/. bill I gave
601. in cash to the bankrupt, and for those of 6(01.
and 1251. I gave him bills of his own acceptance
which had been dishonoured during his minority.
State the particulars of those minority bills ?—I do
not recollect the amounts, nor the dates, nor by whom
they were drawn, but I apprehend they were princi-
pally drawn by myself.
Are they entered in any of your books ?—No.
Have you any means of furnishing the particulars
of the minority, bills you state you have returned to
the bankrupt ? I have not, nor has any person on my
behalf, that I am aware of.
Has any person on your behalf ?—Not that I am
aware of. I wrote to explain that when I stated I
gave him bills of his own acceptance I should have
said of his own acceptance or drawing, and that the
whole together I believe amounted to 7001., and 25/.
was added by way of interest, to make the amount
of the two dishonoured bills of 6001. and 1251., as I
have before stated.
When did you receive those minority bills ?—ln
the latter part of 1840.
What consideration did you give the bankrupt for
them ?—I gave him the whole that I received.
Of what did that consist ?—Cash ; I do not exactly
recollect the amount, but it was upon an average at
the rate of 601. per cent. discount per annum.
Is that transaction entered in your books ?—I do
not believe it is.
You have stated that you handed over what you
received. Now state the amount, and from whom
you so received it ?—I received the money from a
Mr. Cassidy, of Bucklersbury, bill broker (he is not
there now, nor do I know where he is now to be
found), and I do not recollect the precise amount.
Where is Mr. Cassidy now to be found ?—I do not
know. He is a bankrupt.
State as nearly as you can the total amount of bills
received by you from the bankrupt ?—I do not re-
member any others.
Will you swear that you never received them from
the bankrupt, or any other bills than the 601. bill
which you say was paid, and the minority bills
amounting to 7501., for which you state that you re-
ceived the renewed bills for 600/ and 125/. ?—I may
have received other bills, hut, if I have, I believe I
have restored them to the bankrupt.
State the particulars of such bills which you say
you may have received and restored again ?—I do not
remember the particulars. There is a bill for 4501.,
which I received from the bankrupt and Lord William
Paget conjointly, with instructions to take it to Mr.
Cassidy, which I did.
By whose instructions, and for what purpose ?--
By the joint instructions, 1 believe, of Lord William
Paget and the bankrupt, and in order that Mr. Cas-
sidy might send cash to one or both, I believe to the
bankrupt.

Was any cash, or other consideration given by you
or Mr. Cassidy for that bill to the bankrupt ?—The
bankrupt told me he had received full value for it, and
meant to pay it.
When did he tell you that the beginning of
October, 1841.

State the date, by whom drawn and accepted, and
when the bill was payable ?—The date I apprehend
was about the 28th of July, 1841, payable I believe
two months after date, drawn 'I think by Mr. Wm.
Busigny, accepted by the bankrupt, and endorsed by
Lord W. Paget.
Where did you receive that bill ?—At Andover.
When think the day but one subsequent to the
date of it.

Are there any circumstances connected with it,
which will enable you to name the day on which you
received that bill ?-1 received it on the Monday
morning preceding the election for Andover—the last
election for Andover, which I think was ineJune or
July, 1841.
1 rum whose hands did you receive that bill ?—I
have already stated from the bankrupt and Lord W.
Paget, or one of them.
I believe it was inclosed in a note addressed to Mr.
Cassidy ?—I should say that this was on the 29th of
June, and not in July, as I before stated.
Did you ever part to any person with that bill ; and
if so, when and to whom ?—To Mr. Cassidy and no
other person that I am aware of, and on the day that
I received it.

In whose hands was the bill when it became due ?
—I believe on that day, or the day preceding, Mr.
Cassidy left it at my chambers to present it by one of
my clerks.

-By whom was it presented ?—I believe by one of
my clerks, and subsequently by Mr. Window, a
notary public.

What became of the bill after it was noted ?--I be-
lieve it was returned to Mr. Cassidy.
When should think on the following day.
•Was that bill ever in the hands of your bankers ?
—Not that I am aware of I do not think I ever
saw it after I gave it to Cassidy, until it was noted.
Will you s*ear that you never placed it in the
hands of your bankers ?—Yes, according to the best
of my recollection. -
Now, will you swear positively that you never
placed that bill in tour banker's hands P—l cannot
swear positively. I do not believe I ever did. Ido
not think my bankers ever saw it, and, if they did, it
must have been before I took it to Mr. Cassidy.
Who has possession of that bill now ?—I do not
know.

When last did you hear who had the custody of
that bill ?—I did not hear for many months.
Who then had the custody of it ?—A Mr. Weeks,
of Sloane-street. I belhave he is not in any business,
and lives on his means. His Christian name is Chris-
topher. I have known him for many years, and have
done buainess for him.

Will you swear that you have not received bills of
exchange and promissory notes from the bankrupt for
4,0001. ?—Certainly not; I only received two pro-
missory notes for 1,0001., which I returned to the
bankrupt.
When did you return them ?-1 should imagine in
October, 1841, and at his request; or it may have
been September. Ido not remember the time.
Have you now got your books ?—I have. lam
not aware that I can give you any other information
than I have already given, unless it be contained in
my bill of costs, which has now been for many
months in the bankrupt's possession, or in that of his
attorney. I cannot, by my books, or by any other
means, give you further information.
The examination of the witness having concluded,
Mr. James said he appeared for Lord Hunting-
tower, and now on his behalf and right, to be exa-
mined in explanation of the statements made by
Douglas, Hamer, and others, who had fraudulently
obtained bills from him. Some of these parties seek
to prove, injury has been done to his Lordship, and he
(Mr. James) would again urge that the bankrupt, in
justice to himself and his estate, ought to give every
explanation.
Mr. Commissioner FONBLANQUE—I should think
the assignees would do so, and Lord Huntingtower
shall have every opportunity of giving every informa-
tion in his power. I think examination calculated to
do great good, and publicity to be of great benefit to
the public, and even to Lord Huntingtower himself.
Mr. Arias, for the assignees, said it was very desir-
able that all those large claims should not be pressed.
Mr. Commissioner FONBLANQUE stated that the
bankrupt should have the earliest convenient opportu-
nity of giving every information as to the statements
which have been given by the different persons who
have been examined before the Court. The assignees,
however, must be consulted, and if I find they do not
discharge their duty, which I cannot doubt, then it
will be for the Court to interfere, and grant you an
early day for Lord Huntingtower's examination.
The proceedings of the day closed here, and the
further hearing was adjourned.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
(SATURDAY.)
MANSION-HOUSE.
Captain Fisher, the Principal Harbour-master,
waited upon the Lord Mayor, in consequence of the
statement which had been made by Deputy Peacock,
a few days ago, at the Mansion-house, relative to the
dangerous practice of firing from the Artillery-ground
at Woolwich. A complaint had been made in De-
cember, 1840, according to Captain Fisher's state-
ment, connected with the subject in some respect, and
he called the Lord Mayor's attention to the following
correspondence which at that time took place as to
causing the regulations of the Board to be observed :
" Trinity House, London, Dec. 10,1840.
" Sir,—The Elder Brethren having found it neces-
sary to revive the cautionary notice issued in July,
1837, with the object of preventing the anchoring of
vessels in the line of fire of the artillery practice on
Woolwich Marshes, I am directed to transmit to you
the enclosed copies of this renewed caution, and to
signify the request of the Board that so far as may be
in their power the Harbour-masters will assist in
causing the regulations therein contained to be duly
observed.—l am, Sir, your very humble servant,
" J. HERBERT.
" Capt. J. Fisher, R.N., Principal Harbour-master."
" Woolwich, Dec. 16, 1840.
" Sir—The Select Committee of Artillery here have
twice recently summoned three inventors of percussion
shells to the Marshes of the Royal Arsenal to fire the
same ; but the practice could not take place on ac-
count of ships having anchored behind the butt in the
range, contrary to the orders of the Elder Brethren
of the Trinity House, which, however, they say, they
cannot legally prevent, though they have given out
an order that is enclosed for your information, Can
you do anything for us in this business ? And if not,
will you be so good as to point out how this incon-
venience can be obviated ?
" I have the honour to be, Sir, your most obedient
servant, " J. MAY, Major-General,
" President of Select Committee.
" Captain Fisher, Principal Harbour- master."
" Principal Harbour-master's Office,
" St. Katherine's, Dec. 18, 1840.

" Sir,—l have to acknowledge the receipt of your
letter of the 16th inst., and in reply have to inform
you that I have given directions to the Harbour-
masters at Greenwich and Gravesend to give notice to
all vessels bringing up in the lower part of Wool-
wich, and in Galleon's Reach, to pay particular at-
tention to the printed regulations of the Trinity
House, dated 15th July, 1837, and Bth Decem-
ber, 1840.
" I have also directed Mr. Rowland, the Harbour..
master at Greenwich (who has the charge of that part
of the river), to remove any vessel that may disregard
the Trinity House regulations.
" You must be aware that there will be much diffi-
culty in remedying the evil complained of, from
the numerous vessels navigating the river and stop-
ping tide—in fact, I may say it amounts almost to an
impossibility.
" The only plan I can suggest is, that the range of
the artillery practice should be altogether directed to
the Marshes.
" I am, Sir, your obedient humble servant,
" JNO. FISHER, Principal Harbour-master.
" To Major-General Sir John May, her Majesty's
Arsenal, Woolwich.'
The LORD MAYOR said he had written to the
Board of Ordnance in consequence of the representa-
tion of Deputy Peacock, and had received an answer
stating that the subject was under the consideration
of the Board, and that he should receive 'a communi-
cation as soon as possible from the authorities.
Captain Fisher said he could not think of any re-
medy for the evil except the application of the whole
of the ground of the Marshes to the artillery practice.
The purchase, he believed, could be effected for about
20,0001. by the Government, and then no danger
could be incurred on the river.
The caution alluded to, the Lord Mayor thought it
would be advisable to publish as extensively as pos-
sible. It is as follows : -di
"NAVIGATION OP THE 'IMAMES—CAUTION TO PILOTS
AND OTHERS.

" Trinity House, London.
"It having been represented to this Corporation,
by direction of her Majesty's Board of Ordnance, that
great inconvenience is occasioned to the public service
by the disregard shown to the marks which are set
up on both the Kent and Essex banks of the River
Thames, in the lower part of Galleon's Reach, for the
purpose of denoting the limits of the range of fire
from the artillery practice in Woolwich Marshes ; and
that, on a recent occasion, the arrangements which
had been made for the trial of some newly-inyented
shells could not be carried into effect without endan-
gering the safety of a brig, and other vessels which
had been anchored in the direct line of fire, and that
similar interruptions are constantly occurring, the at-
tention of masters of vessels, pilots, and other persons
navigating that part of the River Thames, is hereby
directed to the notices which have been previously
issued upon this subject, and they are cautioned, and
strictly enjoined, not to stop tide, or come to anchor,
for any purpose whatever, within the limits denoted
by the aforesaid beacons.
"By order, "J. HERBERT, Secretary."
CLERKENWELL.

Hannah Hopkins, a well-looking young woman,
about 20 years of age, was charged by Mary Ann
Pake, an elderly widow, residing at No. 45, .White
Lion-street, Islington, with having robbed her under
the following aggravated circumstances :
It appeared that the prosecutrix occupied a kitchen,
and supported herself scantily by taking in washing
and needlework. About five weeks ago the prisoner,
who was enceinte, came to the house, and with tears
in her eyes supplicated shelter, saying she was in a
state of starvation, and in the greatest distress and
misery. The complainant took her in, shared her
bed with her, and fed her. The prisoner was de-
livered of a child three days afterwards, and every
possible attention was shown her. She recovered,
and then talked of leaving the house, but first re-
quested the complainant to take a letter for het to
one of her friends, who, she hoped, would give her
some pecuniary assistance. The complainant set off
with the letter, but could not find the person toswhoin
it was addressed. Upon her return she found the
prisoner had absconded, taking with her everything
the place contained, except the bed. On Friday last
the prisoner was apprehended. The prosecutrix said
she had, by this robbery, been reduced to the greatest
distress. She was commiserated by every person in
Court. The prisoner was taken into custody at a
pawnbroker's, where she was pledging part of the
property. Upon being asked how she could be guilty
of such heartless conduct after the humanity shown
her by the complainant, the prisoner hung down her
head, and did not deny the robbery. She was then
remanded for further inquiries to be made.

UNIVERSITY INTELLIGENCE.
CAMBRIDGE, DEC. 9.—The following appointments
have taken place :
The Rev. John Stoddart, D.D., of Clare Hall, to
the rectories of Lowick and Islip, Northamptonshire ;
value 6851.
The Rev. John Arthy, M.A., Jesus College, to the
rectory of Caister St. Edmund, with Markshail, Nor-
folk; value 4471.
The Rev. Thomas Turner Baker, 8.A., of Trinity
College, to the perpetual curacy of• St. Stephen, Tovil,
near Maidstone, Kent.
The Rev. Thomas Storer, B.A. of St. John's Col-
lege, to the incumbency of St. Andrew's, Northampton.
The Rev. Thomas Hill, 8.D., of Trinity College, to
be one of the non-residentiary canons of the Cathedral
of Lichfield.
The Rev. Robert Sutton, M.A., of Trinity College,
to be chaplain to the Lord Mayor of York.
The Rev. Augustus Kerr Bozzi Granville, M.A., of
Corpus Christi College, to be domestic chaplain to the
Earl of Ripon.
OXFORD, DEC. 10.—The Lord Bishop of Salisbury
has presented the Rev. H. Deane, formerly Fellow of
New College, to the prebend of Alton Australis, in
the Cathedral Church of Sarum.
The. Rev. B. Hemming, late of Magdalen 111111$
has been presented to the curacy of St. Andrew 3,
Pershdre.
The Rev. L. H. Rudd, of Pembroke College, has
been presented to the curacy of Little Comberton,
Worcestershire.
The Rev. S. R. Waller, of Brasennose College, has
been presented to the curacy of Kidderminster.
of
r
DIOCESE OF CHICHESTER.—The Lord Bishop
Chichester has appointed the Rev. H.B. lir. Churton!.
of Brasennose College Oxford, to the prebendal e
still
of Colworth, in Chichester Cathedral, void by the re'
signation of the Rev. W. F. Raymond. His Lordship.
has also appointed the Rev. H. Brown, Principal 0!
the Diocesan College, Chichester, to the prebendal
H
stall of Waltham, in the same Cathedral, in the rOOO
of the late Rev. J. G. Chanel'. The Rev. enry
Smith, M.A. has been licensed to the
racy of Appledram, vacant b the death of the Rv.
y
Lord Chan-
B. Churchill,
on the presentation of the
eral
cellor. The Bishop of Chichester will hold a gen
ordination on Sunday, Dec 18. John
DIOCESE or WORCSTRR..—The Rev. Francis
Bodfield Hooper, M.A., Rector of UPPer Warren,.
perpetual cu-
has been appointed rural dean of the deanery t
of Stoke Prior, has been presented to that vicarag„,
Which. The Rev. Harcourt Aldham, 8.A., curate
vacant by the resignation of the Rev. R. Sariea":,
The Rev. Henry Bromfield, B.A. has been institute
to the vicarage of Grandborough, Warwickshire.
been
Rev. Frederick Hamilton Bennett, 8.. A.,
alias dine,
licensed to the curacy of St. John's, Be-war
wilt
NhasDrboecessn
Worcestershire. The Lord Bishop of Worcester
hold a general ordination in the cathedral on Sand*
Dec. 18.
ttitt
EinOsFt
tPuEt
eTdE Rtl3oo Rt Oh Ue G
rI t
oTr
yh 0 e
orthamptonshire, void by the death of the Rev.
Oldacre.

•
ATTEMPTED MURDER ANY
SUICIDE. r
On Thusday evening last, the inhabitants sit.
winning were alarmed by the intelligence that an ed
Atempt had been made to murder a female, narfnor.
for-
Margaret Gardiner, by an individual who hal es
merly been her lodger. The man in question, Jairtr.
Marshall, a mason, had been residinc, in Kilwinnifol.
for a considerable time past, but had lately „ilea And
Ireland, where he had been for a short periv`"A the
only returned on the same evening he attempte",er
life of his victim, and sacrificed his own. He met
.leci
with great seeming kindness, and afterwards inviiew
her to walk with him, and managed to get her ife
yards away from the house, when he drew a 'nen.
and_, stabbed her in the lower part of the abdamthe
I ortunately, the weapon came in contact with
busk of her stays, and was thereby diverted raid
its intended course, else no doubt the wound 1%:,°„,,L1 0
have proved fatal. She shileked " Murder," and
into the house, and medical assistance was t' are
diately sent for, and the wound dressed. IVe the
glad to say that she is rapidly recovering. but, 03
meantime Marshall had made his escape, he
search being instituted by the police and
was found lying in the garden, and taken to a place
of security. He soon after exhibited signs of tieing
a
extremely ill, and confessed to his having "ri.ing
strong dose of arsenic. He expired, after doing
great agony, on Friday at noon. The
nearly
70
man was about 60 years of age—some saYineriti-j'etne
—and previous to his death stated that he nation of
all the way from Ireland with the sole inte.n,";iilly
perpetrating the deed that has been so provlue"lo,
others, he
frustrated. He had been previously three ern, e,s,,i,ave
ried, and love and jealousy combined are saiQ"-
o the rashhe
been the incentives to the commission
act. He is also said to be the last of thealin!;fiver-
celebrated gypsies of the same name.--AP
tis er.

NEY PAPERS.—The New
_...
Tun BUR
sth) of the ondence of Miss Burn 3"
will Diary and Corresp
probably excite more attention than any or':
which has yet appeared. The extraordinary- seen
in the 1
]querries'-room at Windsor Castle, be-
of Clarence,
tween his late Majesty, when Duke
and the Ladies of the Queen's Household
.---t:
'Volume (tehe_
the scene between George the Third and the 3.l*.bee
of Weymouth—the proceedings of Charles Fox, af
t the
Fcelebrated Literary Club on the breaking en' `). of
the
Revolution—the adventures
Duke de Liancourt and the Marquis de ( naTe
related by themselves—the conversations of 1301‘....:
Erskine, Windham, Fox, Warren Hastings,
38tici;ry
the extraordinary scene at the Shakspeare a` 41111
belia,l'aie
between Mrs. Wells, the actress, and the
Mrs. Crewe, and, above all, the Letters of Malay $
de Stael to Miss Burney,—these comprise
few",/vo
of the topics that will give an eclat to' the ile'f io
lume nat attained even by the most pPular °
and escay.o._
_,
predecessors. aline 5°
THE METROPOLITAN.—There is no AlanA dins
exactly shaped out for the lovers ofthat class of reia.,l the
denominated
light, as the Metropolitan. None °I" ' 17 wit-
monthlies contain such a collection of sparkling
riot
velettes, and we decidedly set it down as the fgfull of
of its class. The " Savindroag" is still continue", f the
l
gorgeous descriptions of life among the nations ° the
East, and the rites of their mythology. 11r,e ipkenlet
tale fully better than any of its kind we. nasr,i- with
with. The " Damosel's Sale" is still contnue , the
its usual spirit, and the rest of the articles,for
greater part, are new. The " Memoirs 0f a BoyeflOfficer," an early companion of Bonaparte, 'ries of
vancing, and there are also several other arbe,,iht
striking interest in the present Number which '-ge-
be mentioned, besides the Reviews, for which the
tropolitan is remarkable.—lnverness Courier. The will
WILL OF THE LATE MR. JOHN REEVs•---',,ecliant
hasof the late John Reeve, the well-known e°"' rt of
recently been proved in the Prerogative al pro'
the Archbishop of Canterbury. The Pers°/uu valuer
perty of the deceased has been sworn under the ded
of 4,0001. The property is pretty equally' di'sialips,
between his son and two daughters. -'3' r' being
bookseller, of Pall-mall, who was killed Yip opo
thrown from his carriage a short time since, w
of the executors of the will. ag• a in 6'5
great national work are actively ORDNANCE SURVEY.—The persons eng-ue in the
• „hbotir.
survey of the streets of Leeds and the net rood
hood, and their operations seem to attract s•
deal of public attention.—Leeds ilferctiror
employed

On the 6th inst., at Dalmahoy,
BIRTHS.
the of Marta,
couutesi
of a daughter. ^- Amu- town, Mrs.
Oa the 10th inst, in Camden-street, ideas--
Miguel Yglesias, of a son.
On the 10th inst., in M t 1 f
on agn-p ace,
lady of Alexander Trotter, Esq., of a son. I/ the '
Edinburg •
On the 4th inst., at Coates-crescent, •
of John Stewart Wood, Esq., of a son. 13 id°tris'
On the 9th inst., at Brixton-hill, the lady of J. •
Esq., of a son. f COtaiS
3,footagu.Kitlaret tk.
On the 9th inst., of a sen (still-born),,the lady 0
John Fordyce, of the Bengal Artillery. Charles
On the 9th inst., in Goswell-street, the lady o f .
Gordon, jan., Esq., of a son. of genii
On the 9th inst., in Nottingham-place, the lady
Methold, Esq., of sen, still-born.
___.-----------4

A
On the 10th inst., at SMRR I
t. Mary's, ED
Islington, Charles Vii°jrs:,
second son of James Waterlow, EN. of Hoxtod, 01 Loll.of
Mary, youngest daughter of the late' Mr. John Masters,
Esher, Surrey. 12.
William Francklin, to Penelope Maria,
On the 6th inst., at Paris, at the British Embassy, the h.:,. 0
Bowyer, Esq ,of the Manor Estate, Clapham, Surrey. ~..A
On the 10th inst., at St. John's, Hackney, Mr. Rieu"—_.
Barnes, of Camden-road Villas, Camden-town, to El'"'
daughter of W. Ati'l
fourth daughter of the late George Eves, Esct______.--

DIED.
On the 10th inst., at his seat, Hardwick Grange, Shrop-
shire, General the Right Hon. Viscount Hill, G.C. 8., G.C.
&c., Colonel of the Royal Regiment of Horse Guards Biu°,
Governor of Plymouth, and late General-Commanding-15
Chief of the British Army, aged 71.
On the 10th inst., at Cobham, Surrey, Caroline Treby,
Molesworth, the widow of Sir William Moleswurth, Bart. a°
,
Pencarrow, Cornwall, aged 82.
On the 9th inst., at Plashet, Harriet Elizabeth, daughter of
W. Champion Streatfield, Esq.
On the 9th inst., at Brighton-place, New Kent-road,
Ann Parry, daughter of the late Isaac Parry, Esq., of Iv'''.
worth-terrace, Surrey, aged 71.
On the Bth inst., at Wellington-terrace, S. Johns-wood,
Mrs. Caroline Augusta Pollok, wife of Major Thomas Pollok,
C. 8., Madras Infantry.
On the 7th inst., at Manchester-street, Gray'
Hannah Hannah D'Aranda, tel;ct of the late Benjamin D'Aranda, sur-
geon, at Billericay, Essex.
William Dogrel
On the 30th of October, at Bombay,
Mackeson, Lieutenant and Adjutant, 19th Regiment of Beg
Native Infantry.
On the 20th of October, at Bombay, Mary, the wife of csr
tain Edward Hume Hart, of the 19th Native Infantry.

------ 0
London: Printed and Published by MURDO I(ol3Piddi
No. U 2 .Strand, at The Sun Office, No. 112, 8°1;4;e
the County ot Middlesex Monday, December 12, 10**