The Sun.
London, England, 1829-10-16 00:00:00

part of a soldier, should perhaps, have retired into
Asiai and left to his Lieutenant the task of carrying
on, if possible, for a little longer, the contest on
this 'side of the Bosphorus. Henceforth, at all
events, he cannot be a free agent on the banks of
the channel. It will now probably be the object of
the Russians to keep him where he is, to call him
an ally, and to make use of him so long as it shall
prove convenient to do so.
" By the rumoured stipulations of this Treaty, a
surrCequal to about 150 millions sterling, compared
with our income, is required from the Sultan,
whose resouues are totally exhausted, and who
could not obtain credit for a sliver. Hopes are en-
tertained that sonic modification may be procured on
this head. It will not much signify. Four for-
tresses on the Danube are to ate demolished ; four
other fortresses in Asia, with the fertile and beau-
tiful Pachalic of Akhalzik, are to be ceded; the
greater part of European Turkey is to remain under
the guardianship of the Czar ; and the intention is
avowed by one of the supposed articles, of placing
the commerce of the Euxirie, Asoph, Marmora, and
even that of the port of Constantinople,- at the dis-
posal of Russia! That a the Caspian is already
so ; that of all the Levant would of course be soon
similarly influenced."—.Morning Advertiser.

LAW NOTICES.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH.

- -
Causes on Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes will
be tried in London on the I►9th October. Application to
postpone such as are defended on merits, must be made to
Lord Tenterden by summons, supported by affidavit•, on
the 14th October. A day's notice must be given to the
plaintiff's attorney of the intended application ; and the
summons must be taken out on or before the 13th, and
made returnable on the 14th, on which day they will be
heard.
London Special and Common Juries Appointed.
Common Juries, Tuesday, Oct. 20.
Palmer v Hope Boyer v Weeks
Shearsby v Coul+in Bell r Boxer, Gent.
Taylor ♦ Gedge Calvert v Slatter
The King r Carrington Izon and others v Bishop
and another I G►wan v Layall
The s nne v the same 1)e Visme v Mott
Rowden v Edmonds Wsllford ♦ Merchant
Wilson ♦ Kaye, Gent. Whitfield v Hambrook
Ellis, Gent. v Woodford Hart v Seaton
Bickerton v Collett Wilson v Bardry
'l'aylor v Watson and another Putney • Ford
Angler Alexander Hudson r Jackson
Wilcock v Mason De Gra♦e and others r Rob.
Payne v Johnstone son, Gent.
Phillips • Crosthwaite and Gilman v Hague
others JJailey ♦ Paine
Gibbins v Davies Rotherham and another I'
Norton v Cranwell Jones.

Special Juries, Thursday, Oct. 22.
Congreve, Bart. v Hutton Ogle v Pratt
Brown v Duncan I De la Chauntette v the
Graham and another v El- I Bank of England
lice and others Hermon and another v Kin-
Brocklebank• v Sugrue naird
Soulby v Knight and another Clegg v Woi hrs.
Murray v Hodgson, Esq. Adams v Sanders
Sand and others v David- Mope v Whiggins
son Brown v Capel and another
Baxter v Hobhouse and Smith v Heskeketh
others Roberts v Davies
Ball v Hall and another Bramnah and another v
West v the same Bennett.
Oct. 23.
Sturge:v Groves
Tennant and another v
Straehan and another
Gordon ♦ Taylor
Yorke and others ♦ Barnett
and others
Griffiths v Bostock, Gent.

Friday,
Murray ♦ Heath (by order)
Nicholls v Asquith and

another
Pitman and others v Daniell
The King, an the prosecu-
tion of the Apothecaries'
Company, r Clapham

Burke v funnicliffe

Saturday,

Oct. 24.
Hall and others v West
The same ♦ Connop and
another
Wilkinson v Howell.

Watts v Lawson
Baker v Watford
Lebo v Dyer
Mitchell and others v Baring
and others
Monday, Oct. 26. —Remanets of former days.
Middleex Common Juries will be tried on tile adjourn
ment day, the 27th Oct., and daily till the 31st inclusive.
Middlesex Special Juries appointed.
Monday, Nov. 2.
Howell v the same
Bury v Stewart and others
Smith v France.

West v Newman
Newman r West
Hicks v Baker, Esq.
Robinson v Waterhouse
Thursday, Nov. 5.—R,

COURT OF CO;
London Special J

Monday,
Wardale v Dixon and others
Everett v Barclay
Pantifex v Dunston and

others
Delafield v Freeman, Gent.
Tuesday,
Brunatte v Edden and others
Buxton and another
Greenwood

Wi!son y Burgess

_
Wednesda'
Moser and another v New-

man and another
Laundy and another ♦ Ben-

susan
Cazenove v Sugrue

Thursday,

Bossley v Owen
Foster and others v Charles
Gore v Wynne
Murray v Nichols and
another

Friday,
Fawcett, Gent. v Huble
Hodson and another v

Tarleton
Daviee and others v Burton
Siturday,
Glenny v Thi?zelton
Morrison v Jones
The Wardens of the Gobi-
smith's Company v Nol-
lans, Clerk

Monday,
Birch v Alexander and I

another
Gardner v Thieteaa
Bottomley v Pugh
Parr v Garrard

- -
Tuesday,
Bland ;.7.nd another v Gordon
Bretton v Pettlsan
Croa:rev Lee and mother