The Sun.
London, England, 1842-11-23 00:00:00

• of
ead
rge

f,Appiause.) HQ found his trade sinki under hiu,
tit he was determined that if he must die he wot-trl
rot go without a struggle.—(Cheers.)
THOS. THOWASSON, of Bolton, said it was pro-
posedw to raise 50,0'4)0/. to repeal the Corn-laws. They
were all asked to contribute; let them not say they
ein111(1 not afford ; could they afford to undergo a repe-
'„Hon of the last four years' trade ?—(Hear, hear.)
self Itld
though they afford to go into the Gazette? For him-
; he could not d the sum, he
!Pare 1001. to the Fund. affor
—(Loud cheers.) yet
Sincewould the
formation of the League he had given 501., and he was
mew Willing to double it, for he had made up his mind
Would reduce his establishment to the most repub-
rrea n simplicity, and almost live on bread and water,
ather than fail in his subscription to the League.
',tklderman BROOKS said when he got up before be
the best part of the communication he was to
imade. He wls out the day previous (Monday)
lvi!
;,,h the little red book he held in his,hand, with the
"ire Lie word " League " on it, and he did not ask for
thrai 1001. from each subscriber, yet he found
avallies wiling to . put down subscriptions to the
F93,otint 1,000/:—(Loud cheers.) He would not
ile them the names, because he .was in hopes that
'te,shoeld be able to get the amount doubled yet.
that
BRIGHT said he might as well state
thlellaPs that a gentleman had called on the Council of
Teague from Todmorden, saying that though it
__ass, suiall place they had had a meeting last night,
',lug raised about 100/. for a beginning.—(Applause.)
•',,l_lecrington lie had reason to believe that 2001. or
would he raised.—(Applause.) •
•to liteßnkNi said he was commissioned to hand Betel -
subscrlptions ; and first he had the pleasure
°(cfl,4alidittg in 100/. from Mr. James Proctor—
i ot:It-also 100/. from his (Mr. Bickhatn's)
......tanipdistiionnth(eßenewed cheering)—thirdly, he begged to
same for himself—(Continued cheering)
,era.lid in the fourth place he had to hand in a sub-
to
l_es the of 251. from Mr. Daniel Proctor.
sidLe CHAIRMAN said he begged to state that be-
-1;000/. in Mr. Brook's red book (which was
doW)led) he had to announce several other sub-
scriptions,eers— Richard Cobden, and Co., 2001.
; James Proctor, 1001.; Daniel Proctor,
4vrth-ivlr. Artn. Bickhain, 1001.; the Mayor, 200/.;
°ab Armitage and Son, 100/. : H, and E. Ash-
tees --,Y°l.; E. Shorrocks and Co., 1001.; Messrs.
ce, e, ,
Aershaw, and Co., 100/. ; Benjamin Smith and
Soi;', 31°°/•; Mr. Hibbert, 100/. ; Jacob Bright and
'were °C)/. Robert Maun, 2501. The announcements
AI
ree,eived with great applause.
ebieert.l6sTEß, from Sabden, rose to say his principal
for nl Corning there was to have his name put down
subscription of 100/.—(Cheers.)
haMr. j• CHADWICK, of Eccles, said he should be
kV' to give 1001.—(Cheers.)
pf eitAiRmAN said he had just received the names
11 Mans and Nicholson for 50/., and of Mr. George
rth (Rochdale) for 25/.—(Cheers.)
schiter a
short pause, it was announced that Mr,. Jos.
jl'ri° efield (Rochdale) had given 501. ; Mr. James
kisury),2s/.—(eers) Th •
suiw th is CHAIRMAN said heCh . had not thought to con-
dowo s partners before he came, but he would put
see n 100/. for himself in addition to his yearly sub-
lytion of 100/.—(Cheers.)
14:4-L,other pause ensued, after which the name of
of
Jo -Geary Leese was announced for 10/., and of M
l
Lord, of Bacup, for 150/.—(Loud cheers.)
of Roman Potter, then took the chair, and a vote
separilltelds.liaving been voted to Mr. Greg, the meeting
LA

W IST-TELLIGENCE.

CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)
LANCASTER V. EVORS.
,f 1111 S case stood on the paper to-day for the purpose
er'hling the Court to hear Sir Charles Wetherell's
.eni, •
1_1"':, nut upon ',the Lord Chancellor taking his seat,
,Lee requested the Learned Gentleman to allow a part-
-4,.oard tithe case to proceed, and the further considera-
o of the ease was postponed.
Th OLIVER V. LATHAM.
The arguments in this part-heard tithe case were
.811111 ed and occupied the Court the whole day.

gIirEEN'AM-ENdH.--(THIS DAY.)
/ Ilia QUEEN V. BINGIIAM.—MANDAMUS.
n a this case a rule nisi had been obtained, calling
13ingliam Esq., one of the Magistrates for the
Jaunty of Middlesex, to show cauhse. why a man-
Taus
should not go, ordering
.im to issue a
fresh...a summons against theandDire of the
to assess the
ternu Counties
t.Railway,due
from the Railway Corn-
Zoks amount of compensa_l?sniey
Y_ptao one Samuel. for the occupation by the
101 ny of certain lands 'belonging to Elsley from
lawcthlUenth of February, 1839, to the November fol-
It appeared that the Company, in the
..,'44gtE-•
s of their works, had found it ne-
,es_
.itsrry to occupy this land belonging to
th .eY for a. temporary purpose, and, according to
1.1. e Provisions of the amended Act of the Company,
the la"
the Company should temporarily occupy
theT4'a" two Magistrates were empowered to assess
taeunt due for such occupation,
lirovi(, compensation
:reason 'hisuch claim should have been made within
Patio 4'l time, from the time of the occu-
win: 'LI the old Act of the Company,
lion ;ell a Jury was empowered to assess compensa-
Cotn'„:),lldaSsl notice was necessary to be given to the
itess r—Y of the intention to assemble the Jury to as-
isie`'lnPensation. In the month of July, 1841, Mr.
coon! applied to the defehdant, who issued his sum-
gam ag•Linst the Company. On the hearing of the
his 111" s Air. Bingham called upon Elsley to prove
15roveillice of claim, and on his failing to
late ins notice the Magistrate told him he came too
bet',4,lltl dismissed the summons. In the month of
iss,,_ q. following, Elsley applied to Mr. Bingham to
hea"". a fresh-summons, and stated that since the last
111, 11(1;g. a notice of claim which had been served on
'quire('in,Pany in December, 1839, within the time re-
Ala DY the Act, had been discovered. The
thrgistrate refused to issue a fresh summons, and
fore etIP" application was made to this Court
n
- mandamus, calling on Mr. Bingham to
er Il the
tie, • case, on the ground—first, that no
tha 4 was requisite, according to the provisions of
ct of Parliament ; and, secondly, that if such
teen',N;vas requisite, fresh evidence on that point had
aoastrmiseavered. The case turned entirely on the
C
action of the various clauses of the Acts of the
raPan
y.
The
and 'Danz, having heard the Selicitoreneral
At-
torne'-tr. James against the rule, and the
Y-Creneral in support of it, ordered the
*rat to be made absolutppe, on the ground that the
kuossluanaons had been improperly dismissed, inas-
Col: as by the provision of the Act notice to the
lvtts
squired.
the intention to apply for a summons
--Rule for a mandamus absolute.