The Sun.
London, England, 1816-07-17 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGNNCE.

Vomr. OF KING*NIitiNCIi,GUiLDHALL, lutor le. ,
CHALAERS. AiiD ANOTligit V. WOOD.
The plaintiffs were trustees of the estate and*
'effects of aperti named Henry Willinan Eastman,
who had granied an annuity, payable out of
fund's, of 3:33/. for AVe years and a half, in
quidation Of a debt of 12001. borrowed by him Of
the defendant. A pelSoll' nam'ed • Pearson, the
landlord of Baifinfan, b.ttl levied 'upon the .gooda,
and Asttels found upon Ids prtmiset, in Suffolk-
lane, for Year's rent. Tife plaintiffs, in °Hee
to prevent the removal of the property,- beeacie
purchasers, Under the Sheriff,, of the goods In
questiOn; but continued Eastman in the posses'.
Sion therehf, in order to carry on his husinesS;
The defendant's ennnity having beeotne in arrest,
betook out an execution against Eastman's gohils,,
and actorsiingly seized and sold the goods, which
were the subject of the prosecution, the plaintiffs
clalitilng theta as bone fide purchasers under the:
Sheriff's bill of sale.

An attempt was made, on the part of the de.
fentlane, td r, ov e that the sale under which the
plaintiffs claimed-to tie owners of the goods, was
effected, by collusion; hut this defence appearing
to be without foundation, tbe plaintiff's had a ver.
dietDinnages 2204
MARVEY V. Z'oYPLRTo'N.
frrhi.4 its Aul affidavit upon .a Bill of Excbange
for,lool, accepted by the Defendant, and dated
in 1803. 1n order to take the -caie'aut of thi
Statute of Limitations, which the' defendant
pleaded, &t was proved, that within the last six
years,. the defendant promised to pay the Bill by
tnstalments; hut neglected to keep his promise.
An attempt was made to prove, that the 1110.10
for. whiCia the :Bill Was given by the defendant,
was lent to .biM and a person named Appleton';
with Whom hi had been in partnership,' but thiS
defence tailing, '
The Jury found a Verdict for the plaintiff—,,
Damages. WV.: 10s. including interest.

CONSIi7ORY COURT, DOCTORS' CONISIONS', Juts IG6

HARVRY V.

this was a cause of Divorce institut&bir
Geare Frederick -.Harvey, formerly of
his Majesty's 187.11 regiment of Light Horse, and
afterwards payrnaster of the Recruiting District,
against Honora Elizabeth Hester Harvey, his
wife,. commonly called the Right Hon. Lady'
Honore,. by reason of adultery alleged to have
been committed with Lieut. R. Usher, belong*
ingto one of his Majesty's regiments ofloOt. It
appeared that the marriage took place hY licence
on the Ist April, 1809,' at the Parish Church of
All Saints, in' the c(ntney of Southampton, and
that they cohabited together as man and wife,
having issue by that marriage, till
,the year 181 h,
When a criminal intereolirse was bad by Lady
•Harvey with Lieutenant R. Usher; that in the be-
linning of June in that year,: Captain Hat vey
went to Cheltenham, and Lady Harvey did not
,artive there till the 15th of the same month I that
on the very clay Captain Harvey set elf for Chel
tenhain, Lady Harvey was observed to go tp the
lodgings of Lieutenant Usher, situated in Kirby..
street, Matton-garden, where the alleged crime
of adultery was stated to have- been committed.
The Counsel on the part of Lady Harvey stated
to the ,Court, it was impossible to oppose the
charge of adultery alleged.
'1 he .Cottrt (Sir WM. L;;COTT) was of :Opinftql,
that ,-evidence produced in the case d'art,.
Proved the met of adultery, end accordingly plea
raye_.
pounced for the remedya high the husband p