The Sun.
London, England, 1842-09-08 00:00:00

Just publi Ihed, 12mo. cloth, price 4s. 6d.,
ON MINERAL WATERS, with particular re-
ference to those prepared at the Royal German Spa at
Brighton. By J. C. AUGUST FRANZ, 111. D., AL R. C. S.
London : John Churchill, Princes-street, Soho.

Just published, 12m0.,55. cloth,
•
THE MODERN TREATMENT of SYPHI-
LITIC DISEASES, both Primary and Secondary ;
comprehending au Account of Improved Modes of Practice
adopted by the British and Foreign Hospita:s, with numerous
Formula; for the Administration of many new Remedies. By
LANGSTON PARKER, Surgeon to the Queen's Hospital,
Birmingham.
London; John Churchill, Princes-street, Soho.

Just published, Bvo.. cloth, price 4s.
HASTINGS, considered as a RESORT for IN-
VALIDS: with Tables Illustrative of its Temperature
Salubrity, and Climate, showing its suitability in Pulmonary
and other Disea,es ; also Directions for the choice of a Re-
sidence, and Hints as to Diet, Regimen, Bathing, &c. By
JAMES MACKNESS, M. D., Physician to the Hastings Dis-
pensary.
London : John Churchill, Princes-street, Soho.
0

Just published, Bvo , cloth, price ss.

BSERVATIONS on ULCEitS of the LEGS

and other Parts ; showing that the most obstinate Sores
may be safely and speedily cured by mild Methods and Treat-
ment. To' which are added some Remarks on Scrofulous Dis-
orders. By ARCHIBALD MAXFIELD, Surgeon to the
South Hants Infirmary.
London : John Churchill, Prinees-street, Soho.

'THE THIRD }DITION.
To be had of all Bookseli ers,
_price 43. 6d.,

THE WATER CURE. A. New System for re,
storing injured constitutions to robust health, for the
Radical Cure of Gout and Rheumatism, Stomach, Liver, and
Nervous Complaints. Tic, Scrofula, Syphilis, and their conse-
quences, &c., &c., the result of Observations made on Two
Thousand Patients.

By JAMES WILSON,
Physician to his Serene Highness Prince Nassau.
London . John Churchill, Princes-street, Soho.

The Author ha% now formed an establishment similar to that
of Priessnitz, at Great Malvern, celebrated for the purity of
its air and water, and every other adjunct for giving the Water
Cure its full effect.

Just published, post Bw., price ss. 6d. cloth,
ON SPINAL IRRITATION, the Source of
Nervousness, Indigestion, and Functional Derange-
ments of the principal Organs of Ole Body ; with Cases, il-
lustrating the most successful mode of Treatment.
By EVANS RIADORE, F.L.S., &c.
London : John Churchill, Pri ncos-street, Soho.

FLAVER'S EMBROCATION for GOUT,
RHEUMATISM, TIC DOLOREUX, &c.
Copy of a Letter addressed by Trevor Holland, Esq., Surgeon,
of Carmock, near Walsall, Staffordshire, on the 6th July last,
to the Editor of the " Times :"
ctShhishr ,
efficacyaa
s—golb:tlechnai
ranorkeef
trni
st
with
ythdhu
wwtayhovnileediho.eywr
wonderful
vitmoe
beret
tab neal:cp.fiicuttihbdtlesi
anectmte o,7nla:envaiitkfna.
yks,noamwnned
mwthhoe‘
dislo-
catedg
and fractured my ancle severely. From the great tender-
ness of the joint I was quite unable to walk, the limb con-
tinued very much swollen and adematons, and I suffered
dreadfully from severe attacks of spasms in the night. which
extended from the ancle to the leg, t high, back, and to the
arms. Having exhausted every resourim of relief which I and
my medical friends in the country could suggest, to no
purpose, I set out for London with the intention of con-
sulting Sir Benjamin Brodie or Mr. Liston—then to adopt sea-
bathing. By accident I met with Mr. Fea ver, 16 Ludgate-hill,
who applied his Embrocation, and, to any great astonishment,
I had no spasm that night, nor have I had one since. The next
rooming I came down stairs without my crutches, and was
able to walk, the swelling of the limb soon subsided, and I am
now rapidly recovering. Having for many years had an ex-
tensive medical practice in the county of Stafford. I know of
no medicinal compound possessing such wonderful efficacy.
In adding my testimony to Mr. Fenver's Embrocation, lam ac-
tuated by no other motive than uratitude to him, and a sincere
desire to make known his nivel in.ble remedy to my fellow-suf-
ferers. Possessing, as I ever did, the strongest prejudice
against everything in the chap a of quackery, I should be the
last man to uphold a system w hich, generally speaking, I know
to be nothing but a. nefarious traffic and humbug.
" I am, your obedient servant,
" TILY:VOR HOLLAND, Surgeon.

" Carmock, near Walsrll,Staffordshire.
" P. S. At the various comMtations held up3n my case, the
surgeons and physicians ( including myself) were decidedly of
opinion that the frequeni violent attacks of spasms would ter-
minate in lock-jaw, but , as I have before stated. I have not
had the slightest symptot ps of spasms since the first application
of this extraordinary em brocatiotr.—T. II."
This justly-celebrated remedy (which is equally efficacious
in any of the above die; ctice is) may be obtainel of, or through
any respectable wholtsale or retail Chemist in Town or
Country, at the Depot, cot ner of Wellington-street, Strand ;
or from the Proprietor. Mr.. Penver. 16, Ludgate-hill, London.

----- -
In his early glorio as days, Buonaparte was as thin
as water gruel. His ; 'ace was sharper than is usual in
our race, and that ei tabloyl him to cut his own way to
preferment. Fat men are generally good for nothing
but aldermen and ju 3ges ; although at.the Sandwich
Islands they are mute, into ,chiefs.

James Onions and John North were brought before
Alderman Gins in the custody of Daniel Forrester,
the officer, upon a charge of having conspired with
other persons not in custody to defraud Mr. Henry
Gaze, of No. 155, Cheapside. The case excited much
interest.
Mr. Clarkson, the barrister, and Mr. Hobler,
jun., attended for the prosecution, and Mr. Curling,
the solicitor, appeared for the prisoners, who, as well
as other individuals, had been summoned to attend on
a former day and had not made their appearance, and
against whom, upon application of Mr. Clarkson,
warrants were issued.
Mr. Clarkson stated that the prisoners were
charged with having entered into a conspiracy with
others to defraud Mr. Gaze, by circulating several
bills of very considerable amount as the acceptances
of Gaze and Co. On the 16th of last December, Mr.
Gaze entered into partnership with John Onions, thq
brother of the prisoner James Onions, under the firm
of Gaze and Co., Cottage-row, Bermondsey, for the
purpose of carrying out a patent connected with the
business of malleable and general iron founding. It
was ascertained, however, that John Onions was by
no means an eligible partner, and as the deed of
partnership contained a clause by which the partner
ship could be dissolved if the returns did not prove to
be advantageous, Mr. Gaze gave notice of disso-
lution in the usual manner. It was also provided
by the deed of partnership, that if one of
the parties refused to sign the instrument of dissolu-
tion, the signatures of the other two should be suffi-
cient to carry the object of the majority of the firm
into effect, and Mr. John Onions having refused to
sign, Mr. Gaze, and the third partner, Mr. Tuckett,
did all that was necessary to give efficacy to the deed
of dissolation. Since that dissolution, which took
place on the 17th of June last, Mr. Gaze found that
John Onions had put into circulation several bills of
exchange, purporting to he accepted by the firm of
Gaze and Co., for not one of which bills this firm had
received tire slightest consideration. One of those
bills was drawn by a journeyman carpenter, lately in
the employment of the firm. Another was drawn by
a journeyman moulder, who had been employed by
them fbr a short period. A third was drawn by
person, said to be a potboy at a public-house. A fourth
was drawn by James Gaze, the prisoner, to the amount
of 600/. ; and others were drawn by other individuals.
By the deed of partnership, Mr. John Onions was
strictly prohibited from drawing, accepting, or indors-
ing any bill or check connected with the firm, and
from giving any order for goods, except under the
value of 51. • but that and every other prohibition had
been violated, and it had been found necessary to adopt
the present course to prevent the utter ruin which
otherwise must result from so depraved a conspiracy.
Mr. Gaze stated that he was connected with the
iron foundry at Bermondsey, under the names of
Gaze and Co. He entered into partnership with John
Onions.—(Witness here produced the articles of part-
nership, which contained the clauses referred to in
Mr. Clarkson's speech.) The articles contained a
provision, that if any partner refused to sign the deed
of dissolution within fourteen days after notice, the
signatures of the two other partners would accomplish
the purpose. Mr. John Onions refused to sign the
instrument, and Mr. Tuckett and the witness signed it.
Mr. Curling submitted that, by the production of
the deed of partnership, the prosecutor threw himself
out of Court. Mr. John Onions, for whom, as well
as for the others interested in opposing the proceed-
ings upon the part of Mr. Gaze, he (Mr. Curling)
was engaged, claimed, as a partner, an interest in
these bills. The question was matter for the investiga-
tion of a Court of Equity, and not for the adjudica •
tion of a Magistrate. Mr. Gaze had no right to pro-
ceed criminally against his clients.
Mr. Clarkson said the indenture distinctly prohi-
bited the very acts of which Mr. John Onions hed
been guilty, and it was ridiculous to get up a defence
so totally destitute of moral or legal foundation.
Mr. Curling said that this was not a case in which
it could be pretended that it was sought to defraud the
public, and that it was very easy to bring forward
criminal charges; but he assured the Alderman that
a bill had been filed in Chancery on the part of the
accused in this matter, 'and that a Magistrate had no
jurisdiction whatever in it.

Mr. Clarkson declared that a more gross case of'
fraud could not hare been perpetrated, and that the
attempt to screen it under the plea that the conduct of
the accused was justified by law or equity, showed but
a very indifferent claim upon the part of the adviser
to the character of an intellectual agent.
Mr. Curling defended the position he hat assumed,
and intimated that Mr. Clarkson's observation was
little worthy of regard, inasmuch as the Learned Gen-
tleman received fees for pouring his abuse around in
the most prodigal manner.

Alderm-an amns—l am willing to take bail for the
appearance of the prisoners to answer any charges
which may be brought against them.
Mr. Curling said he hoped the Alderman would
not so severely prejudice the case of his clients as to
oblige them to find bail. Mr. John Onions had a
right to do as he had done, and the whole business
had been submitted to a higher Court, by which alone
it could be decided. He (Mr. Curling) was the pro-
fessional man employed upon the occasion, and he
spoke from an intimate knowledge of all the trans-
actions which had taken place.
Alderman T. WooD having entered the Justice-
room, the facts were briefly stated to him at the de-
sire of Alderman Gibbs, and the former expressed a
most decided opinion that his brother Alderman
adopted the only proper course, in requiring securi-
ties for the appearance of the prisoners, to answer any
charges which might be brought against them.
Mr. Curling declared that no evidence had been
gone into calculated to fix the least suspicion upon
his clients.

Mr. CLARKSON then called Mr. Gaze, who re-
pudiated all the facts stated in the Learned Counsel's
representation, and denied, upon cross-examination, that
any other partnership existed between the firm of Gaze
and Co., and Mr. John Onions, than that which re-
lated to the patent alluded to. He swore that the
dissolution of the partnership had been regularly ad-
vertised in the Gazette. He had by the deed agreed
to lay out the sum of 500/. on the experiment, but he
had made made himself responsible for 2,0001., and
for the bills issued by those accused t'te firm had
received no consideration whatsoever.

It is here proper to mention the eviderce given
upon the first examination of the prisoners en the pre-
ceding day, which evidence it would have been in-
jurious to publish on the following day.
Mr. Gaze said, he had seen the prisoner James
Onions several times. James Onions had applied to
him to assist in bringing out the invention, and sub-
sequently showed him a bill of exchange for 500/.,
purporting to be accepted by the firm of Gaze and
Co. The bill was not drawn by witness,
nor by his authority. It was afterwards
presented by the Secretary at the house, and
not paid. There were several bills presented
of a similar description for payment wholly un-
authorised by the firm, and the prisoner North aided

'rom
Th,

Yesterday Henry Knott,
GUILDHALL.
Lucy Knight, were re-examined before Mr. Alderman
John Samuel Crispin, and
T. Wood, charged with obtaining 4/. worth of black-
ing, by false pretences, from Messrs. Everett and Co:,
of Fetter-lane.
2-10a,m
leitool3b,
The effect of the evidence was, that Knott mistak-
sinegnthtios
received it, and said Adams was .not at home, but
luveAlld_satmrese,t,ordwehreerdethteheblarcekalingAdtoambes
would call with the money on Messrs. Everett next
day. When the porter wished to take the blacking
back, Lucy said Mr. Adams was a wealthy and re-
spectable man. Against Crispin, it was alleged that
he called on the prosecutor, and represented that he
1-44 put up a hill to let the shop, . and he let it to
Adams at 30s. a week, without references ; that Adam's
had gone away in his debt, and he should be very
happy to assist in finding him, while in truth Crispin
and Adams were old acquaintances. Lucy professed
to be the servant of Crispin.
Mr. Wooler urged that Knott alone obtained the
blacking ; and however intimate the other parties
might be, they had themselves no share in that fraud;
and if a man committed an offence all his friends were
not .necessarily.criminal, .or indictable as confederates.
Lucy had done no more than a servant might do
without beccming a criminal, and Crispin had nothing
to do with the shop after he let it.
Mr. Alderman WOOD said the character of a ser-
vant did not protect her in doing an illegal act. He
had no doubt there was a conspiracy, some of the par-
ties taking a subordinate character to carry it out.
He committed them for trial for the misdemeanor.
Mr. James Crooke, a. medical student, appeared be-
fore Alderman Sir G. Canitor, -to answer a charge
made . against him by Mr. Lewis, music. seller, of
Cheapside, of having attempted to incite him to a
breach of the peace.
It appeared that the defendant resided with Mr.
Lewis, and that the quarrel arose between the parties
owing to some imputation cast on a young lady to
whom the defendant was paying his addresses. Mr.
Lewis admitted that he had said she obtained some
music from him without paying for it, upon which
the young man demanded satisfaction.
Mr. Crooke said, in his defence, that when he
called upon the complainant, he said, " I am not to be
bullied by an apprentice boy." Defendant replied
that though he was an apprentice, he was a gentle-
man, and must have satisfaction. He then replied
44 Very well, I have got some pistols down stairs."
Mr. Lewis—No . I said I had an old' musket.
Mr. PAYNE—I think if you could see how ridi-
culous you both look, you would not have come here.
Sir G. Glamor, said if the parties would promise
not ts, interfere with each other, he would not bind
them over.

..iNT '
o reconciliation, however, took place
Magistrate apprehended little dangt`r, hut as
theythe were al-
lowed to depart without finding bail.
Boil7-SIREP.7.
Mr. James chamberlain, the large spectacle
ththis
i na.ii u -
factu r e r , of Bowl-yard, Belton-street, was
morn-
ing placed at the bar, charged with assaulting
Police-
constable F 82, under the following circumstancesdntyabo :
The constable stated that he was on
Cult ten
o'clock last night in Belton-street, when Mrs,
berlain, without either bonnet or shawl, came Pam-
him, and asked him what course she should adopt,ii- to
her husband had refused to admit her into his house.as
Witness replied that he could not interfeiriebnbenw,etielne
man and wife, but if she would go with
station-house he would introduce her to the inspector.
She said she would accompany him, hut she must g
returnedher bonnet first. She then returned to Mr. Cham-
berlain's
house, but was prevented from entering,
he having, by his resistance, wedged her in be-
tweenor-post for nearly five the door and the do
minutes,ri till she became quite black in the face.
I 1 tness, fearing fatal results, then, with the assist-
ance of the people outside, forced the
_door open, when
Mrs. Chamberlain fell to the ground as if overcome
by exhaustion. Immediately witness got into tne
passage he was seized by the prisoner, his coat was
torn, he was struck
treated. That wasas several times, and otherwise mal-
Three witne the assault complained of.
witness.-s corroborated the policeman's evi-
dence.
Mr. Chamberla'
a drunken woman, and that she had been at that
Court on that charge. He contended that he had a
right to exclude '
her when she came home intoxicated.
He was the injured party, and had called upon the
policeman to tac
lie only laughed take away
Nivilas yfahcies.wife and protect him, but
in
A witness also corroborated. Mr. Chamberlain's
statement.
Mr. TWYFORD
sa'l
d he could not believe the pri-
soner's witness when opposed to that of the policeman
and three others. He should fine the prisoner 40s.
211 A R y.L EB ONE.
William Moss, moss
and a
cabman, was charged with drun-
kenness,robbinghis fare.
Police-constable
d
at the corner E, saw last night late a crowd
ofli erners-street, and Oxford-street,
surrounding the prisoner and his cab. The prisoner
was partially-run
k
senseless. Prom and a boy inside was quite
information received from the by-
standers he thought
station-house. Th boy his duty to take him to the
A witness proved was sent home by the inspector.
that defendant had taken money
out of the boy's pocket
while he was insensible.
The prisoner entereds into a rambling defence, in the
course of which he
admitted havinc, received money
party
third to take the boy home.
Magistrate Magistrate fined him 40s.
CLEE
KENWELL.
Owen Ilfacarthy,
et Ellen Macarthy, and Ala
Shanahan, Irish bask
n
°people, were placed at the bar,
before Mr. Broughton, a charge of having violently
assaulted Patrick Macabe,
dealer in old clothes, and
stolen from him a
handkerchiefa and waistcoat.
Patrick Macabe stat
....ed that, on Mond
when standing near Autonmouth-street, the prisoners'
Monday evening
severally came up
violently assaulted
They threw him down," ili
and stripped him of his in.
hand-
kerchief and waistcoat. He had his coat on at the
time.
how The witness having be en asked by the Magistrate
he could be stripped of
i hisi
waistcoat while wear-
sng her except , sethat he wemed at first
nable to give any other
nswa,
wards said that the waistcoataNtl Irishman. He after-
was torn off his back.
Patrick Quin confirmed atportion of his statement.
The prisoner Shanahan ally
of b denied the charge.
g
'Waddinton, the gaoler tot ,
here stated that the com-
plainant was in the habitringing parties before
Magistrates on charges which
w
tained by evidence. He believed the complainant
ere altogether unsus-
had been transported many Years ago for a highway
robbery.
The MAGISTRATE said that he
could. not believe the
statements ofthe complainant, andd s missed the charge.
KENSINGTON
Yesterday Patrick Larkin, a no;
T division, No. 192, appeared before--e-constable of the
the sitting Magistrate, to answer Mr. T. Paynter,
a summons at the
instance of Mr. Henry Rhoades, a builder, resting
at 30, Newland-street, Kensington,
for an alleged
violent assault. The case excite Much interest, and
the Court was greatly crowded during the hearing of
the case.
Mr. Rhoades deposed that on the night of Thurs-
day last, about eleven o'clock, he
walking in the
neighbourhood of Pembroke-square,
ahouse 1, in the square,
, veasington, with
a female, when on passing the
a friendminute while she
the female asked him to wait
who lived
knocked at the door, and spoke to
there. He did so, and in about
fivesaid her
minutes after-
wards she returned to him, and
her friend had
been in bed, but was then up, and he
might walk in.
He accordingly went in with her but he had not
been in above three minutes before he heard a knock
at the street door, and the young woman with whom
as
he had been walking, as wellthe female of the
house, left the room and went to 1:..1,
door..eln about
two seconds afterwards he hearda
out "What do you do here ?" and man'sthvoice
calling
those words were
blow no sooner said than he received a on the head,
which was followed up by at least twenty other blows,
as well as kicks.
By Mr. PAYNTER—Did not see u •
ntil afterwards,
who his assailant was, and then found.that it was a
policeman, the defendant. The blows
violently with the fist. Could not were struck
say whether or
not the defendant used his staff, as complainant was
so stunned, Was in the front parlour,. fronting the
street, when the defendant came mDefendant
charged complainant with taking lib.
erties with his
(defendant's) wife. Complainant told
false thin, its it was impossible to do so him
it was a
when an-