The Sun.
London, England, 1845-02-18 00:00:00

si redaction of duty, a great increase in manufacturing
exports, and if they recollected that there could not be
to increase in our expert of manufactures without an increased
demand for labour, that would be some compensation for the
has of revenue. ea it was with the duty on wool. Would it
cot be irrational to regard as lost the 100,0001. subtracted from
the revenue, in consequence of the reduction of duty on wool,
When that reduction was known to have spread over our wool.
Isla districts an activity in the manufacture, and a comfort
Among those employed in it, seldom known before ; and would
lleot the Noble Lord find in the increased demand for industry, and
the increased demand for the articles of necessary consumptim.,
tenple compensation for the reduction of the duty on wool.
lie could forebel that the loss on coals would amount to
seo,cioor. ; but if that loss were incurred, they had the
lestlsfaction of knowing that they entered into competition
with their formidable rivals in trade upon better terms ;
Iwo the advantages which they would derive from so en-
tering into competition would more than compensate them,
the be calculated—would compensate them in a three-fold
degree, for the loss they might sustain. The Noble Lord might
Ise entitled to say, on reviewing the tariff, that he said that
*axes had been reduced, and that there had not been an in-
crease in the revenue in consequence. He bad told the House
on a former night what might possibly be the advantages de-
delved from a continuance of the income-tax. He did not wish
to say that the tax ought to be continued for a longer period
than that which he had stated, for he did not think it likely that
She House would wish nor consent to it as a permanent tax.
lie thought that, previous to an experiment on what consti-
tuted a very onerous taxation, that the House would con-
sent to films renew al of the income-tax—he hoped that it
would do so during a period of peace ; and hoped, too,
that in a period of peace they would not impair its efficacy
erisriug a time of war by too many exemptions.—( Hear,
Soon ) At the same time, he must say, that the tax
now was much less onerous than it had been felt to
be during the years 1842 or 1843. There were much less
Complaints now made at the Stamp-office ; and he must also
say that he did not expect that, from the payment of the tax
Itself, any urgent demand would be made on Parliament to re-
peal it itrimediately. The Government was deeply convinced,
seeing the nature and importance of some of the duties that
were about to be repealed—seeing that the duties on glass pre-
vented the success of the manufacture of that article ; and see-
ing the dangers that threatened their cotton trade from the in-
creasing competition to which it was exposed, they were, ho
repeated, decidedly of opinion that the duties on glass and
cotton slould be repealed, that both required that repeal, and
fer the most urgent reasons.—(Hear, hear.) It was from that
conviction—it was from the well-founded belief that all classes
of tke community would be benefited by the remission of taxes
that interfered with manufacture, that they had come to the
conclusion that it was necessary to propose for three years the
continuance of the income-tax, and he did hope that such a pro-
p ssition would be supported by the almost unanimous concur-
rence of the House.—( Hear.)
Lord HOWICK (who rose amidst cries of " Chair, chair")
said that he would not occupy the House many minutes—
( Hear, hear)—but he could not, after the speech of the Right
llon. Baronet, avoid expressing his disappointment. After the
atement of his Right Hon. Friend near him, as to the ge-
neral financial condition of the country, and after the state-
ment of the Right Hon. Baronet himself, he could not but
express his disappointment that the Right Hon. Baronet had
cot answered the statement of his Right Hon. Friend in the
whole Course of his speech.—(Opposition cheers.) He (Lord
Howick) would ask what, according to the Right Hon. Baronet's
own figures, incorrect as he thought they were, what was the
state of affairs ? His Right Hon. Friend had shown what that
was upon the figures of the Right Hon. Baronet. It was this,
that although they were renewing the income-tax for three
years, end that their getting rid of that tax was a prospect
further and further removed, like the visible horizon on a large
plain, retiring to the same distance from. the vision the more
you egEpect to approach it—( A laugh)—for it was now inti-
mated that it might yet be continued for five years instead of
three. Notwithstanding this, there would still be a surplus in
the next year of only 90,0001.—( Hear, hear.) At present the
Right Hon. Baronet had a surplus'of 3,400,0001. to deal with,
and out of that surplus he at once disposed of 310,t 00/.
( Hear.) He (Lord H.) would ask was a surplus of 90,000/.
sufficient to calculate upon for the emergencies of this country ?
--( Hear.) The year which had passed was one of a great
harvest and unusual prosperity; and was it advisable to run the
balance of the expenditure for the next year so close and fine?
Hear.) n' they did so, they would run a great risk of a
positive deficiency. Not only that, but the Right Hon. Baro•
net, on the most favourable showing, expected only a surplus of
00,000/. Small as that balance was, it was entirely problema-
tical, and depended entirely upon the raising of a large addi-
eienal sum upon sugar.—( Hear, hear.) He believed that no
one gentleman, on one side of l
asso House or the other,
would venture to say that such rplus would be rea-
lised. The Right Honourable Baronet calculated it upon no
less than one.fifth of the whole consumption, and upon no less
a sum than one million, the receipt of which was entirely pro-
blematical. If there were any disappointment in the receipt of
that stun, there would be no surplus but a deficiency. When
they eonsented to the continuance of the income-tax, was it a
satiafactery state of things, that they should have a positive
dewficiency instead of a surplus ?—( Hear, hear.) He for one
thought it most unsatisfactory.—( Hear, hear.) He like his
Right Hon. Friend objected to the continuance of the tax, but,
like him, he did not see how it was to be dispensed with.
They were willing to vote for it as a tem-
porary measure. But they thought that in so
voting for it, the country was entitled to such an arrangement
as to give a well-founded hope that at the expiration of three
years they would be able to get rid of it.—( Hear, hear.)
'There were two descriptions of taxes which were certain to
give great relief without loss to the revenue—he meant, first,
the protecting duties.—( Hear, hear.) Now, what was a pro-
tecting duty ?—( Cheers.) It was a duty which levied much
money from the people which never went into the Treasury.—
(Cheers.) For instance. the duty on sugar.—( Hear, hear.)
etigar could be obtained from Brazil at 12s. or 14s a hundred
*alight of an equal quality to colonial sugar, and the people of
this country were compelled to use colonial sugar. They were
levying the money which ought to go into the Trea-
sury, and as the Honourable and Learned Member for
Bath himself said, part went into the pockets of the
'West Indian, and part was absolutely wasted.—( Hear, hear.)
There were other duties which might be repealed with ad-
vantage for financial purposes. He meant those duties which
'were too high, and which encouraged smuggling, and the re-
duction of which would cause an increased consumption and an
improved revenue. The public would gain and the treasury
would not suffer. if they were to put the duty upon sugar
wen a fair and reasonable footing, and get rid of the distinc-
tion between slase-grown sugar and free-labour sugar, he he-
/loved that in a financial view the revenue would gain. But
be would go further, and say that when they made any redac-
tion on sugar they ought to take the opportunity of equalising
the duties wherever the sugar came from. Instead of loosing
15500,0004 as was proposed now, and which was wantonly thrown
away, the revenue would gain. The protecting duty on cheese and
butter, and other articles, might be abolished with advan-
tage. There were other duties of extravagant rates, and great
cost in collection, such as the duty on tobacco, which ought to
have been considered on this occasion.—( Hear, hear.) The
last mentioned duty was exorbitant and was productive of in-
finite sriaggling. The Right Hon. Baronet would have done
great benefit to the country if he had dealt on the principle of
commpn sense—that is, of free trade.—(Cheers and a laugh. )
And if he did not do so, bow could he expect that, in the short
space of three years, be would be able to make a surplus
sufficient to dispense with the income-tax ?—(Hear, hear.)
But he did not object to the vote the Chairman
he hel
did d in
most his
hand. lie only took that opportunity of saying
strongly protest against the measures by which the renewal of
the income-tax was to be accompanied. The people of this
country were going to be burdened with a most oppressive tax,
and they had a right to expect that it should be accompanied
y measuretVhich would hold out a reasonable expectation
that at the expiration of three years there would be a probabi-
lity of their being released from it.—( Cheers.)
Sir JOHN TYRRELL assured the House that at that late
period of the evening he would detain them but for a very few
minutes. It seemed to be the general consent that this was to
be the final and closing debate as far as the agricultural interest
was concerned ; and, as a humble representative of that body,
he thought he had reasonable claim upon the attention of the
House. He must say that, notwithstanding the able speech of
the Right Hon. Baronet that night, and the three hours'
speech of the previous night, in which not only had the Right
.Hon. Barouet taken a most able and comprehensive view of every
interest in existence, except that great interest of which he
was an extremely humble representative. Still, he must say,
th he participated in the opinion of those who thought
that that interest had been hardly dealt with. It was some-
what ominous that the 14th of February—viz., St. Valentine's
Day—(Laughter)—was a most unfortunate day for the
agricultural interest, because, when the Right Hon. Baronet
on the 14th of February, 1834, was paying his addresses
to that intecest he said—(Continued laughter)—and the lan-
guage that he used upon that occasion would not, lee was
sure, be tedious to the House..—(Hear.) At any rate it
would be intelligible to the country, and would
let them know what they were to expect from
any- future Minister. It wouldi show, too, on what grounds
the agricultural interest had been led to entertain those hopes
which he regretted to say had been blasted by her Majesty's
Bevernment, who had not felt it their duty to show their feeling
for the agricultural interest of the country in the shape of their
financial interest. He held in his hand a sufficient proof to
justify the agriculturists in their expectations, and he hoped
it would receive the best attention of Hon. Gentlemen oppo-
site. The Right Hon. Baronet was a very difficult bird to lay
salt upon his tail—( Laughter)—he could not expect those
Bon. Members would think over the obtuseness of any agri-
cultural member whose hand was confined to the plough
and whose conversation was of oxen. But still he did think
that the Right Hon. Baronet had used the agriculturists
with extreme hardship after taking the cheers and confidence of
that interest at Cambridge. It was glaring, not only from the
lkoo-utee of the Right Hon. Baronet, but from the fact that a
tO)le *Lord was translated to the other side, for no other
services than those which he he had rendered to the agricul-
tural interest.
Several How. 'Hematites—What Noble Lord?
Sir JOHN TYRRELL alluded to Lord Ashburton. He
would take the liberty of reading one or two short ex-
tracts, expressing, as they did, what that body had a right to
expect. The Right Hon. Baronet had objected that no means
Ind been seggosted for relieving this interest, but they had relied
upon his devising some measures for this purpose. He did not
my that itly direct remission of taxes would have such an effect,
but still he thought some commiseration ought to have been
expressed for the sufferings of the agricultural body. He
quoted from a debate which took place on the 14th of February,
1864, on the subject of the Budget, brought forward by Lord
Althorp. On that occasion the Right Hon. Baronet had
Slide use of the following expression--" It was admitted that
there was the sum of 1,200,0001., which might be appropriated
to the reduction of taxation. It would be difficult to show bow
that could be employed so as to give relief to the agriculturists,
but if it could be shown that relief could be given, the 1,000,0001.
eaglit undoubtedly to be appropriated for that purpose. He could
st y that relief ought not to be given at the expense of the
p
ohllu credit, bit if it could be given without injury to the
public credit he should most certainly advise it." The Right
Hon. Baronet concluded by expressing this opinion—" He
hoped the NomablelLiojdtwould keep his eyes open to the opinions
expressed in
an he
speech with regard to the agricul-
taral interest,
not allow the sessie. trusted the Noble Lord would
effect to them." Afn
ter to
languageterminaotef
that
thouktind giving
y
had a ist
relied
oliedexpzotu that something would be done for
them. They , his acuteness, and his
ingenuity, and they expected that before that time some relief
would have been afforded. Many tad been assigned
for the agricultural distress, but he believedsesl.
prevailing
opinion amongst agriculturists that the distress,the whether
founded in mistake or not, was attributable to the course
of measures which had been introduced into that House
by the Right. Honourable Baronet, tending asthey had
done to depreciate the value of agricultural
The language of Lord Ashburton, also, on the occasion when
corn was proposed to be introduced from the Channel islands,wn
was worthy of note. The Hon. Member then read an extract
from a speech by Lord Ashburton, deprecating the introduction
of so much core from Canada, the gredaStatester part of
He did which,
not
he
said, came, no doubt, from the Unite.
mean to argue that any conclusive opini
were underon was there
the im-
pressed; but if the agricultural interest
pression that they were suffering
. from that cause, surely it was
a reason why great disappointment and anger should be ex-
poessei, and great grievances stated by the agricultural inte-
rest, in consequence of the measures of the Right Hon. Ba-
ronet. Now, he had no hesitation in saying, also, that he
thought the agricultural interest had been hardly dealt with by
the Noble Lor the Member for the City of London. He had
viten had a bond e to pick with the Noble Lord on this subj ect,

Those by whom the Noble Lord was supported and surrounded,
were in the habit of saying that the agricultural interest
was predominant, and agriculturists had even been accused that
night—" God knows how fruitlessly," exclaimed the Hon.
Member—with having great interest with the Right Hon. Ba-
ronet.—(Great laughter.) A few years ago the Noble Lord
himself said that he thought it right to give the agricultural
interest a predominance. The Noble Lord shook his head;
but, after a diligent search (Loud laughter) —he
could assure the Noble Lord, though his me-
mory might be imperfect, there were several Ho-
nourable Gentlemen on both sides of the House who
had heard the declai ation, although having made so many on
the subject it was not surprising that his memory should fail
( him.- On bringing up the report on the address,
in the year 1837, the Noble Lord said :—" Sir, at the time
when the Reform Bill passed, I stated my belief that it must
necessarily give a predominance to the landed interest ; and al-
though it may be deemed that such predominance has been
somewhat unduly given, I still think that a predominance in
favour of that interest tends to the stability of the general insti-
tutions of the country." The Noble Lord had shown by his
language this session that the agricultural interest had nothing
to expect at his hands.—(Hear, hear.) The Right Hon. Ba-
ronet ( Sir R. Peel) had stated that he was touched with the
representations made to him by the deputation from the agri-
culturists. As there was no effect, it must have been a
very light touch ; yet he had no doubt that when a
dissolution took place, that great and important interest would
re-appear in the shape of advertisements and addresses to con-
stitueuts.—( Laughter.) An Hon. Member below him (Mr.
Miles) had signified his intention of testing the sincerity of
those who professed sympathy with the agricultural interest, by
bringing forward a motion on behalf of that great expiring in-
terest.—( Laughter.) It would then be seen whether the agri-
culturists were to have no share in the taxation of the country.
He could only say, that if no other Hon. Member should do so,
he intended to give notice of a motion to extend the operation
of the property-tax to Ireland. He thought at any rate that
he would have the support of the Chancellor of the Exchequer
in such a motion. In fact that Right lion. Gentleman had
himself some years ago advocated a similar propsition. The
Hon. Gentleman here quoted an extract from a speech of Mr.
Goulburn, in which that Right Hon. Gentleman advocated the
policy of extending the income-tax to Ireland as well as Eng-
land. He (Sir John Tyrrell) thought it behoved that
House to extend the tax to Ireland. The Right
Honourable Gentleman the Member for Dungarvon
might say that there was no machinery by which to collect the
tax. This might be true with reference to the year 1816 ; but
now they had got the machinery of the poor-laws in Ireland,
and there could be no difficulty. lie thought it was unjust
that such a man as Lord Hertford should be allowed to extract
30,0001. or 40,0091. a year to spend in Paris or Naples, with-
out paying any tax whatever.
The Marquis of GRANBY, who spoke from beneath one of
the side-galleries, and who was very indistinctly heard, was
understood to express a hope that the Right Hon. Baronet at
the head of the Government would realise the anticipations
which he had formed. He admitted, as had been often stated,
that the agricultural and manufacturing interests were blended
—and that when one was benefited and alleviated, the other
was also benefited and alleviated. Three years ago there was
great distress in the manufacturing districts, and if the Go-
vernment held out to them this language, " We know you
are in great distress, but that is not owing to the Govern-
ment, it is owing to disturbances in the affairs of America,
and accidental causes. We therefore cannot relieve you, but
we purpose to take the duty off malt, and though
we do not directly benefit you, you will be benefited
indirectly."—lf the Government. held out such language
to the manufacturers he thought the manufacturers would be
justified in saying you do net use us well.—(Cheers.) The
agriculturists were now in the condition the manufacturers
were in then, and yet they were only relieved indirectly by re-
moving the taxes that pressed upon industry.—( Hear, hear. )
He did net agree with the Hon. Member for Northampton, or,
as some had said, the Right Hon. Gentlemen would give them
up. He believed that the Right Hon. Gentleman thought that
agricultural distress was owing to temporary causes, and that if he
thought it was owing to any serious evil, he would be ready to
apply a legislative remedy to relieve it.
Mr. COLLETT could not support the Right Hon. Gentle-
man the Member for Bath. It was too much the case with
the Legislature heretofore, to make the poor man still poorer,
and the rich man richer, but the measure of the Right lion.
Baronet went in an opposite direction. He highly approved of
the remission of the taxes made by the Right Hon. Baronet.
Mr. ROEBUCK replied. He said, that every person who
spoke on his side of the House condemned the property and
income-tax, with the exception of the Hon. Member for Ken-
dal, who condemned it however for three years, and wished it
to be permanent. But every person declared that the
tax would be permanent, and every person said he was opposed
to a permanent property-tax, thereby he condemned the whole
tax, and yet each and every one said he would vote for it.
Mr. C. BULLER rose amidst loud cries of " Divide,
divide." lie said he would not occupy the House long. lie
was aware of the odd position in which they were placed who
voted for the tax as pointed out by the Hon. Member for
Bath. It seemed the universal opinion on his side of the
House, with the exception of the Hon. Member for Kendal,
who thought they would get rid of an injustice by making it
perpetual—(Hear, hear)—but, with that exception, it seemed
to him that every person was of opinion that the income-
tax would be unbearable if it was to be con-
tinued as a permanent tax. Nothing could induce him to
vote for the continuance of that tax, though he ad-
mitted it might be submitted to for a temporary purpose.
After the debate to-night it would be an insult to tell any ono
that this tax was to be regarded as anything but a permanent
tax. He had never heard the temporary nature of the tax put
forward in more faint terms than it bad been by the Govern-
ment.—( Hear, hear.) He asked the House not to attend
to the assurances of the Right Honourable Baronet, but
to say that the Budget was such that it was impossible
to suppose that at the end of three years the tax would be
taken off. The Right Hon. Baronet had gone so headlong
into the subject this evening that it was to be supposed that
they would have a most glorious revenue if they had no taxa-
tion at all.—( Cheers and laughter.) What was it that had
caused the present favourable state of the country ? Why,
two good harvests and a continuance of the American
trade. He called upon the Chancellor of the Exchequer to
stand up and insure two more good harvests and
a continuance of the American trade.—(Cheers.) If such an
event was to take place, the country would still be prosperous.
If they were for a permanent tax, they must support the pre-
sent measure, for they might depend upon it it would be so,
and then it became them only to modify it, and make it as
bearable as they could. He trusted that they would not be called
upon to express their opinions by a division on the policy of an
income-tax that night. After the debate of that night, he should
not consider himself concluded, but at perfect liberty to pursue
any course he thought proper. He should support the amend-
ment of the Hon. Mmber for Bath.
Strangers were then ordered to withdraw, and the Commit-
tee divided, when there appeared—
For the amendment
Against it
Maj ..• 2OB
Mr. ROEBUCK said he would move that the provisions
of the income-tax be extended to Ireland.
Mr. SHELL said he congratulated the lion, and
the Learn
Hon.
ed
Gentleman on his abruptness, and he was glad that
and Learned Gentleman had an opportunity of reading Ed-
mund Burke's speech on the conciliation of America.—(A
laugh. )
Lord HOWICK could not think the Hon. and Learned
Gentleman was serious in this matter.
Mr. ROEBUCK was quite serious.
Mr. CURTEIS said he thought the Chairman ought to re-
port progress and ask leave to sit again.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER suggested
the propriaty of at once coming to a decision on the matter.
Mr. ROEBUCK did not think the House should be hurried
on so important a matter.
After a few words from Mr. WILLIAMS and Mr. SMYTHE,
Sir ROBERT PEEL expressed his decided opposition to
the imposition of an income-tax on Ireland—the stamp duty
had been increased on the faith that the income-tax should
not be imposed.
Lord JOHN RUSSELL quite agreed in the observations of
the Right Hon. Gentleman, and thought it was better to post-
pone the consideration of the matter to Wednesday next. He
wished to know when the question of the sugar duties would be
introduced.
Sir R. PEEL was understood to say on Friday next.
The House then resumed, and the Chairman reported pro-
gress and asked leave to sit again on Wednesday.
DARTMOUTH ELECTION.
The SPEAKER announced that the securities for prose-
cuting the petition against the return of Mr. Somes, for the
borough of Dartmouth, had been completed.
The House then adjourned at Twenty Minutes past One.

THE COURT AT BRIGHTON.
BRIGHTON, MONDAY, FEB. 17.—Her Majesty and the
Princess Royal, attended by Dowager Lady Lyttelton and
Colonel Buckley, the Equerry, took a carnage airing this
morning along the Cliffs.
Her Majesty and Prince Albert drove out this afternoon
in a pony chaise along the Cliffs, attended by Col. Buckley
and Colonel Wylde.
Prince Albert, attended by Mr. G. E. Anson, walked out
this morning along the Cliffs.
Sir Robert Peel left the Palace for London this morning.
The Venerable Archdeacon Wilberforce took his departure
at three o'clock this afternoon.
The dinner party this evening, besides the royal suite,
comprised the Countess Granville, Major the le
Henry Crediton (Inniskilling Dragoons), and Mr. and MHonourabsr.
Ormsby Gore,

RAILWAY MEETING S.—CAUTION.—The Commis-
sioners of Stamps and Taxes have issued the following notice respect-
ing proxies used at railway meetings :—" Stamps and Taxes, Feb.
10, 1845.—The Commissioners of Stamps and Taxes, finding that
Proxies to enable persons to vote at meetings of railway and other
companies are written, in some instances, en unstamped paper, think
it right to give public notice of the law with regard to such instru-
ments. By the Act 7 Vic., c. 21, the duty on an instrument for ap-
pointing or nominating a proxy is reduced from 30s. to 2s. 6d. By
the 6th section of that Act it is provided, that any such instrument
shall authorise the proxy to vote upon any matter at any one
meeting of the Proprietors or Shareholders of or in any
company or society, the time of holding whereof shall be specified
in such instrument, or at any adjournment of such meeting,
and that no such instrument shall be further or otherwise available,
anything in such instrument, or in any Act of Parliament, to the
contrary notwitstanding. By the 7th section it is enacted, that it
shall not be lawful for the Commissioners of Stamps and Taxes, or
any of their officers, under any pretence whatever, to stamp or
mark, after the signing thereof by any person, any paper on which
a proxy shall be written or printed ; and that if any person shall
make or sign any such instrument not duly stamped, or shall vote or
attempt to vote, or act as proxy under the authority, or pretended
authority of such instrument not duly stamped, every such person
shall forfeit or pay the sum of 50/. ; and every vote made or given,
or other act done in pursuance of, or under the authority or pre-
tended authority of, such instrument, shall be absolutely null and
void to all intents and purposes.—By order of the Board."
THE LATE ROBBERY AT MESSRS. ROGERS'.—ln-
formation is said to have been received in London, from France, an-
nouncing that two men are in the custody of the French
police, Li
whose possession were found four notes for a thousand pounds each,
that had been stolen from Messrs. Rogers's bauk.
LEWES ELECTION.'--'LEWES DAY.--The with-
drawal of Mr. G. B. Kemp from the field on Saturday evening, dis-
possessed this election of all interest. The
of the con
Admsequenceiralty) was, the
re-election of the lion. U. Fitzroy (a Lord
opposition.
ANNOYANCE JURIES (WESTMINSTER). —On the mo-
tion of Captain Bons, a return has been laid before the House
of Commons, of the amounts of the amerclaents levie
dduring by
each annoyance jury of the city of ' Wern
stminster,
the years 1841, 1842, 1843, and 1844, &c. The annoyance
juries are sworn in in April and October in each year, and
each jury acts for six months; therefore the return shows the
amounts of the amerciaments imposed by the first jury for only four
months. The juries have nothing to do with the levying the amer-
ciaments. From January to April, 1841, the amerciaments imposed
amounted to 44/. 10s. ; one amerciament of 1/. was mitigated to 10s.
From May to October the amerciaments were 621. 17s. 6d. ; four
amerciaments to 41. were mitigated to 11. 2s. Gd. From November
to April, 1842, the amerciaments were 56/. Is. 6d ; one ainerciament
of 10s. was mitigated to ss. From May to October, 811. 2s. 61. ;
and one to 10s.'remit'tedto Ss. three amerciaments to 2/. 15s.were remitted. From October to
amerciaments. to 4/. mitigated
April, 1843, 62/ lers - four .
1844, 177 t. Ils. 6d ; three eFrcrioamm.eAnptriis totolloc. ltoOsh.erw, esr6el. remitted,Bst
and one to 10s. rem. iee.to 2/. , and from October to April,
Westminster were fined in amerciaments to 4/. mitigated to it. 15i.,
The result shows that the inhabitants of
weirEplitszandFmoeuasiqurTAesi.
NS It; yTearsaismAientielnued.Bs44ul.
RisE..f_orysheors.t
spectators
.wneettecet attracted to
erection Trafalgar-
st
fel roda ar ye ,
to
witness avast numbertheer oe
of
fill red granite pedestal, which is to support iflfelaorhrtion of the
re-
ceiver,beauti-
or Upper portion of the north fountain. The
materials
eegreular
80tith fountain are on the ground, and both will, it is cape= thee
iirilpietcd in a Pt clays.