The Sun.
London, England, 1820-09-07 00:00:00

. I<'i

cen aitcrl recelrecl the certiacate-the ereniiig bevru I Nrctil

Did' you, see tier after you received that Certificate'.'--I do
not rememhei.-
Did you Ste her after you untler‘toOd you were to quit her
service ?--I (lid.
What paaaed: on that ocrasionq--....1 ler Royal 1-iighliecs told
me that she gave me my disetiarge.iti “reit'r to give au example
to the other servants that ther'e should not Ge quarrels in the

house. . s.
Did her Royal Highness state.what the canse of the quarrel.
was?--She tuld me, tire:arise I had this quarrel with the'
confectioner, she did not like that such quarrels should hap- .
penin the house.
Did, she state any other.reasort.fZir. discharging you ?—She
did not.
Did von. make any,_grirly..)—l said I did not think that a •
tault sufficient for my. discharge.
Did she 91,1 i, aUy ;il;oki,;ti. to your former conduct?--Her
Royal Highness always siroWert her satisfaction °limy couduct. ,
Did she promise you any.certificate of your good conduct ?
No. I did not speak about the certificate.
The AT wished to be allowed to pnt,
thropgh the Court. the -tollownirg question:--Is that paper,
(sliming the certitioltiy) itt thelond-uritiog of Scharini ?
As-far as I know, it is.
!Lee yon tern him writr ?—Several times.
Do yon ben. ve that be his hand-writing,--4 think it is,
for certain: I nut sure. of it. •
Mr. BROtAiIIANI was ahout to address the Hottse, hut was
prevented tiv re prated cries of " withdraw."
The 14)RD CIIANCELLOR.7--Order in the House-
Mr. BROL-GHAM liespolse their Lordships' patience. Whilst
he asked permission to put a question to the witness, through
the Court.
Did not the witness, in answer to thequestion put by the
Interpreter,, as to whether he had replied Cox or elle., among
utirr•e words say, inais 'c'etait relifet ?
The LORD -CHANCELLOR directed. the short-hand
writer to read his notes to that question and .answer. It had
hero written in the minutes," Son A nesse Rcyale aura park
miens que mai, mais Cfteit a vet diet."
-Mr. 1111.01.6L1AN1.,--Let ,hint be asked,, whether be means
to say that he used the first, but not the last of these %voids,
viz. c'stait atet effet.?--r-What he aleant to say Was mass ca
est le fait—but this is the fact.
The witness here withdrew.
The LQUI) CHANCELLOR stated to the House.that in
consequence of x comintinication which had been made to
hint, it became his duty to state to their Lordships, that there
'was one of the witnesses for her Majesty then abroad in such
a state of- health 'as rendered it'impoSsible for biro to proceed
to this country. Under these circumstances, be suggested the
expediency or sending abroad Something like a -Commission,
. provided the consent of Cunusel vu both si.les were given. Thrs
was a mode of proceeding continually practked with respect
to witnesses in Ireland, and in India. Ile situuld not ask fOr
an answer front Counsel that evening, hut he would take. the
liberty of, trent ,ottiog it to morrow morning,. In 'the Ilie4ll
time he had teat it to be his duty to make the pioposition.
Robert Ilure crumbled by the SOLICITOIt-
GENERAL. •
Q: What is your occupation I am one of. the cashiers
in• the house, of Messrs. Coutts and Co. Bankers.
Ho long:have you held that sittiation ?—Upwards of thirteen
years.
Did her• Royal Highness the Princess of Wales ever keep
cash with Messrs. CouttS and Co..?—Yes. •
Have you been in the habit of paying her drafts ?—Yes,
from time to time.
Do you know her hand writing I—Yes,
[The .certificate of Sacchi's character was here handed to
the witness:l.
' Tell us wnether rot believe that signature to be the hand-
writing of the Queen ?—I believe it to he her hand-writing,
when Princess of Wales.
Mr. BROUGH A M.—Do you know the hand-writing of his
Majesty the King I—Yes.
SOLICITOR-GENERAL.—Have, you ever seen the King
write I—Never.
Flow do you know the hand-writing of the King 1-1 have.
seen a Commission, which.l. was told he signed.
Hare you any other knowledge than what you derived front
the paper shown to you, and which you was told was a Com-
mission signed bv the King ?—No. •
Mr. B1t01.:G11AM. —Did the King, when Prince Regeut,
not keep money at your house I—Yes.
Were rot cashier at that time I—Yes.
Then did you pay his erafte ?-lle was not accustomed to
draw birriself.
Mr. BROUGI-lAM.—Ile cannot prove the King's hand-
writing. I admit.
Mr. BROUGHAM 11,M took op a heap of letters, and said
to the Solicitor. Geovral—" Perhaps von kill adroit these let-
ters to he in the hand-writing of the king."
)LICITOR-GENERAL.—I know nothing of them. I can
admit nothing.-
The certificate given to Saccbi on his quitting her Rays
flighnesS's service was-then allowed to be read". It was, %lie
translated, as follows

"Pesaro, Nov. 5, 1817.

" Her Royal Highness the Princess of ‘'alt.4 certifies to
whrinsovec it may concern, that Mr. Givisceppi Sacchi, native,
of Como, has hero in, the. service of her Royal Highness one
year; up to the date hereof, fist as a Courier, and after-
wards Equerry; in all Which be was a most excellent person,
and discharged his duty with assiduity, zeal, and fidelity. He
was discharged as a mere ineastire of economy, that prefer-
ence b, ing given to the elder servants of her ROyal Highness,
which their loPger services deserved.
(Signed), •
" CARCILINA PRINCIPESSA DE GALLES."

The A
ftNEY-I,Ar, ERAL rose to propose put-
ting in as evidence the certificate given to Ma-
jocci. Ile knew. that it, was not in the hand-
writing of her,Royal Highness, but it was writ-
ten by Schiavini, and it bore her Royal lligh-
ness's seal. It stood in evidence that Schiavini
was the person who generally discharged set.,
vants, the he 'would submit that this proof
of his authority gave him a character under
which the certificate written by him was admis-
sible in evidence as an act of her Royal

After hearing Mr. B,P.OUCITIAM and Mr. AT..
TOTINEy-O.ENERII., the LORD CIONCELLOII de-
clared his opinion that Sufficient evidence bad
not been shown to authenticate document in
question, and the Attorney-Peneral was then in-
formed by his Lordship, that he could not be
permitted to offer it in evidence. ,
ArrortNEN-GLNERAL.—I have an application
to make, of considerable importanee, and I wish
shortly to state the object of my application.—
Several, witnesses (three) Who reside at Lugano,
_had set out.for England, and had arrived as far
• •
as 'Beagvais, when information reached them
,that
certain: witnenes who had come to this country
against the 6ieen„had been illtreated: :these.
three. witnesses wereafraid,to come to England,
and they went before,a MagiStrate, and deposed
.that the rcason they did not
.procee'd to England
was, ,because they ys:ereafraid of their personal
safety. The witnesses then returned to.Lugano.
Upon information of this circumstance arriving in
England, a person was dispatched to induce the
witnesses to come over. to England, to appear at
the Bar of the House of Lords to, give eVidence ;
and it wasAhdught the, messenger might overtake
the- witnesses,. but they had arrived at Lugano.
A. letter had, however,-been received, stating
that the witnesses had altered their minds,• and
would proceed immediately to England; and I
have every reason to believe that _they are at this
moment. considerably advanced "On their journey
to this country. Of the importance of their'evi
deuce it:would not become hint to speak ; hut, if
, the information he had received was correct, their
testimony, ;he
,begged to assure their Lordships,
was of the highest, importance to the case .under
investigation. His object was to obtain an
adjournment for a feW•dayS, when the witnesses,
he had no 4oubt,. would be arrived in England
to, give, evidence at their Lordship' Bar.
_lie
submitted, therefore,-to their Lordships' consi-