The Sun.
London, England, 1842-11-16 00:00:00

MARYLEBONE.

George Tremlett, a working plasterer, was placed
at the bar, on a charge of going to complainant's
house, using threatening language, and putting him
in bodily fear.
Henry Tress, foreman to the Messrs. Simpkins,
Oxford-street, and living at 55, Star-street, said that
defendant was out of work the greater part of last
winter, and he (witness) took him into his house from
pure charity, and lodged him. He observed, how-
ever, that the prisoner and his wife appeared rather
familiar, and he (witness) ordered him, to leave the
house. Shortly after his wife absconded, and he sub-
sequently ascertained that she was living with the
prisoner. She soon however, got tired of the
infamous connexion, .anti' witness, at his master's
intercession, ariftSiin`lier.:lironii,se , of amendment,
took her back aktff''',':Sine,4 t4,ii:titne the prisoner has
been in the habiVi*.4llitg,;'at.-LlVitilosi's house and
annoying him. He also;,4eliewed tds,fornier attentions
to witness's wife, and she left a second time, and was
now living with her paramour in 55, Devonshire-
street. Yesterday evening the prisoner came to his
house, and created a disturbance, calling him an old
rogue, and threatening to knock his head off.
Mr. RAWLINSON finel the prisoner 405., and ordered
him to enter into recoinisances of 201. to keep the
peace for six months.

WORSHIP-STREET.
Caroline Turville, a young married woman of re-
spectable appearance, was charged with creating a
disturbance, and assaulting police-constable 'William
Maskell, G 199.

The policeman stated that on the preceding even-
ing he was passing through Dagget's-court, Moor-
fields, when he observed a disorderly crowd assem-
bled in front of a house occupied by a tradesman
named Smith, in whose family a marriage had taken
place that day. They were making a clattering
noise, commonly called " rough music," with tin-ket-
tles and other utensils, and having been ordered by
Mr. Smith to disperse them, he proceeded to do so.
The defendant was standing by apparently counten-
ancing the disorder, and he requested her to go away,
but she refused to do so, and after assailing him with
abusive language she struck him several times on the
breast, upon which he took her into custody.
In answer to the charge, the defendant said that
she resided at No. 12 in the court, and on hearing the
tumult she went out, in common with the rest of her
neighbours, to learn the cause of it. The policeman
made his appearance soon after, and entered Mr.
Smith's house, where he stayed a short time, and on
coining out he wiped his lips, as if he had been
drinking something. He entered the house twice
afterwards, and on leaving it finally, he caught hold
of a little boy, and threw him with violence to the
ground. On observing his conduct, sue (defendant)
remarked to him that she thought he might disperse
the crowd by a more gentle mode of treatment, but
the moment she had made the observation, Mr. Smith
exclaimed, " Take that woman into custody," and the
policeman seized her roughly by the arm, and began
dragging her away. She entreated him to allow her
to get her bonnet and shawl, and her husband fol-
lowed them, and repeated the request, but the police-
man took no notice of it, and continued dragging her
along until they reached the station •house. Her arm
was still in pain, owing to the tightness with which
he grasped it, and the mark of his nail was still
visible on her hand. On reaching the station-house
she showed her hand, which was then bleeding very
much, to the Inspector, and the latter immediately
accepted the bail that ;vas tendered for her appearance
at this Court.

A number of respectable witnesses confirmed this
tatement, when Mr. BROUGHTON remarked that the
conduct of the policeman was very improper, and dis-
charged the defendant,
CLERKEIVWELL.

Hannah Toomey, who had been previously re-
manded, from insufficiency of evidence, was charged
with stealing a quantity of plate, consisting of forks
and spoons, from the house of Mr. John E. Noakes,
Guildford-street, Russell-square.
It appeared, from the evidence, that the prisoner's
mother, a decent, poor woman, is laundress to the
prosecutor; that she, being unwell, sent the prisoner
for the linen, who taking advantage of the absence of
the servants from the kitchen, stole the articles, and
was arrested a few days afterwards, in attempting to
pledge them, in the name of Jane E. Noakes, that the
initials on the plate might raise no suspicions.—She
was committed for trial.

Uln HV-O/oHwAdeLnLa
*rid James Murphy,
Two men, namedJl‘;h
one a carpenter, and the other a corn-porter, were
charged with committing an outrageous assault on
policeman 156 M division.
The policeman while on duty the preceding night,
in Bermondsey, went up to the defendants, who were
making a noise outside the door of a public house, and
requested them to go away. Instead, however, of
doing so, they commenced an attack on the policeman,
knocked him down, and kicked him in the most brutal
manner while he was down, and it was sworn that
had not two other policemen come up at the moment,
the man's life would probably have been sacrificed.
Mr. COTTINGHAM, instead of inflicting a fine on the
defendants, committed them forthwith for one month
each to Brixton gaol.
LAMBETH-STREET.

On Saturday evening,
.before leaving the Bench,
Mr. NORTON announced that the subscriptions ad-
dressed to him and left by many persons who had
called at the Court, for Miss Reynolds and her sis-
ters, amounted to 1201., and expressed his great satis-
faction at the fact. He was of opinion, however, that
the sympathy which had been awakened was owing
to the exposure of the disgraceful conduct, for he
could call it no less, of a class of persons calling them-
selves " respectable tradesmen," in only paying the
paltry pittance of threehalfpence for making a shirt,
and he sincerely hoped that this unequivocal mark of
public reprobation of such a practice would shame
the wholesale slop-dealers into something like common
fairness and humanity, and induce them to give the
poor and industrious persons who worked for them
a proper remuneration for their labour. lie should
not only wish to be furnished with a list of the names
of those slop-sellers who exhibited such a want of
humanity, but to see such list published to the world.
It would then be known whether the public would
approve of such a system by dealing with them. Pre.