The Sun.
London, England, 1820-09-04 00:00:00

ther
cans o.i
sera
the!

ißeio,ist'ert

s Wer6
,Werh4
OW th°
PS'
Lt t(3°l
had
Ps
Ott lot
)-i0 '

ma, $
otll9‘

e9t 01!

)Oth
igetheft
trausly

:don :4
erstO
a great

h inter(
d by °A
as, all"

t in tti

;hair.
ad 00
for Of

:erg
a11u4167

e of 011

she 105
?.ss
to to
his right
i
msuite;
Cfr saiul
t.
,note
great

)1n t 1
ineTD
she.,
3 aIiVAL

flkiTolf!it
Ater, ws
e:cri°v

rson
—I 104

c.
er,
mu .1'
cl°
.
s bu t
t
5

jet
whe°'

slid alf
_1 red,;
t I d°ll

referre,
ter wit"
hat 141

at f°lli
Loncl°i
my au-

the ct/ir
read' to
to go •

nfters
3,5 e
1:11°4
31) re
?---1
I'd gf 0
f
ess, '
iclati°n.l
Areo,
sag tb°
k to b,
a! iligeci
rt 01) ,oi
; int° '
itb f3er
1.10V9w

pure"

"ming over to England. At the same time
I received information to set off, I was told I
could be placed out as a governess, if I had let-
ts rs of recommendation. At the same time, be-
ing afraid her Royal Highness would dismiss my
sister, I wrote to my sister, and dared not write
freely for fear it would be seen. I said to my
818ter) what was read was only to let her know,
if the was dismissed there, I would find means
°',, Placing her here, and pay her journey. If I
i'rote again to her she feared the Princess would
read the letter, and I wished to convince her
°Yal Highness I would say nothing against
ver, even in England. In several private con-
ersations, although many questions were put to
I avoided saying what took place at the
°,use. These are my
i reasons for writing that
et-ter to my sister.
,Mr. Wismams—Ask her if she has given a
full
explanation ?—I have said so to my sister to
PEI the journey. The reference to the banker
15 to say, that I wish to take the money now with
guardian, and place it here. They told me
ittne interest would be double. If 1 had some of
here for.myself, or my sister, I could make use
of it.
Ask her if she has any more last words—any
farther explanation ?—No further.
ti Don't let her be in a hurry ; let her take her
nle ; now, any further explanation to give ?
(After a pause)—l wished by that to convince
the Princess, though I shall have questions put
41) me, money would not tempt me.
Now have you any other explanation ?—I
44), to say -
also that I felt a great degree of at-
tachment to her Royal Highness, for her great
""odness to me while in her house.
Any more ?—I can't remember entirely all.
laW the letter last night ; I saw two letters ;
"IY saw the date of that from Colombier.
Illath! no observation on the other.
don !'en you went from this place last night (I
-v i:2; ask you the names, but) who accompanied
lady, one of my friends.
xa'° you mean to represent that nobody else
vr
tli,, You, since you were examined here last
have seen the people of the house and
the friend who accompanied me; I don't know
e name.
te Is. you delay near this place, where we are,
ref °re You went home last night ?—I went di-
etly home.
)11irectly ; did you not stay somewhere or
flier before you went to the place you reside
1,,•:".", In going out hence I went directly home,
l'uout waiting—
The LORD; CnANcELLon.--That's not an an-
; put it before she began to go.
Wu.LlAsis.--I am not asking her whether
e
she went straight borne, hut I am asking her if
did not stay -somewhere before she began to
"Ine I remained a minute in a room above
ere.
minute—how long ?—I don't recollect ex-
4ctly.
' ° you mean to represent you did not stop
fair an hour in- the zoom above stairs ?—I will
atswear that I may not have remained there
if an hour.
,:/.34 You swear you did not renlain an hour ?
4.,
t swear as to, the time I remained there.
kid at did you mean to say just now, when you
hue You did not remain there more than a
meant I did not remain there long.
11,111`rw, in order to have some notion of that,
1104 You swear you did not remain there two
can't swear as to what time.
you You mean to represent that nobody saw
but the person who accompanied you home ?
kiset.LW the lady who accompanied me home,
bk, ",e gentlemen who came to fetch me.
thi
she nse,an to represent she has not been
ti
the ing of this letter since she was examined in
te
it ly 4.. flacon of yesterday ?—I have not passed
ilie."llle in-speaking of it ; I have been reflect-

D 0
re You mean to say that you have not been
tetnig
toe on it all the time ?—On my arrival at
what
'retired to my bed.
IP eat does she mean by the capital of Europe
`4t letter ?—it is so long since I wrote that
Z 5 that I cannot recal what I meant.
aid ell,
having heard that letter read in French
k tin English, don't you know what you mean
tie') capital of Europe ?—lt is impossible for
at such a distance of time, to recollect what
vall-e"t by all the words. It is so long since, I
11)10t recollect.
° You mean to say that after having heard ,
Lotletter read'in French and English, you do
tikekl°W what it meant ?—After such a length of
The cannot recollect.
taDifn,n You do not know what you meant by the
lotip7; of Europe ?—I do not recollect, it is so
io since.
4tribligain ask, what place did you mean to de-
to .1 e by the capital of Europe ?—I cannot recal
Ivi3' mind what I meant, but that expression I
411 esornetimes in a- double sense, I sometimes
Pe
tt, 'olombier and Lausanne the Capital of Ea-
mr.,-- a joke.
"Of, "at ! call Colinnbier the capital of Europe ?
tri'
An es) sometimes in joke, when writing to my
howd You then meant Colombia ?—I don't know
is it t„-- say in your letter you wanted money-
-4o41: `11,,e or not ?—I might not have money at
41,y unt I could have got some by writing to
I§rllian•
ieet,-,Y°ll- want money or not ?—I do not recol-
it fr l• had money at home, but I could have got
11011:4. rnY guardian. Perhaps I had money at
, 130
Oy _ You mean to say that you were supported
4,l,:irr father and mother after you were in the
Dttrei: of the Princess ?—I paid my board to my
44 for my maintenance.
tithe ; Yr°u were not assisted in money all the
1404.--- 1 do not recollect that any one lent me
y!. Nor gave me any.
ynt have a sister named Mariette ?—Yes.
ti.,"11 were always much attached to her ?—Yes.
the I You wanted her to go into the service of
,
S S ?
""-- es ; because she had, often spoke

to me to get into a situation, and she wished to
travel.

What age was your. sister then ?—Nineteen
years.

What line of life is your step-father in at Co,
lombier ?—A farmer.

Does he farm his own estate ?—He has a small
domain which he cultivates himself.
Is he in tolerable circumstances ?—IIe works
on the farm, and also my mother.
He maintains himself by his daily labour ?
Yes.

He lives iu a small cottage ?—Yes, a small
house.
He ha. a family living with him ?—My mother
and two daughters.

Re-examined by the SOLICITOR-GENERAL.
Q. Has your father any property of his own ?
—A. Yes, the land he cultivates ; by that he
Maintains himself.
Have you any property ?—Yes.
To what amount, nearly ?—Something about 50 louis an-
nually.
Is your sister Mariette in the service of the Princess ?—Yes.
Has she any property of her own ?—Nothing but What she
receives from the Princess; she is my half sister.
You said yesterday you were dismissed from the Princess's
service for saying something that was not true, explain the
cause of your dismissal ?—I was dismissed because the Prin-
cess had been told that M. Sachi bad given it out that
had said that M. Sachi was in love with the Princess, and
a letter was taken out of the post-office, at the bottom
of which I had written " The Princess (aime) loved Sachi
as in former times." I explained the word (rime was not
meant by me to be loved, but, " liked M. Sachi in the same
manner as other persons in the house.".• After this letter I
was dismissed, because I said the Princess loved M. Sachi.
Where was this letter written ?—At Pesaro.
While you were writing this letter, did any one come into
the room ?—Yes; Bergawi.
Did he see you write it?—Yes.
Did you take the letter any where ?—Yes, to Pesaro.
Was any body appointed to go with you?--Yes, Hieronymus
and my sister.

After Bergami came into your room, was any body else ap-
pointed to go with you ?—Bergami came again into my room
with his cousin Bergaini, who was going to Pesaro.
Did Berga uti's cousin go with you I—Yes, he accompanied
me as far as Pesaro.

Did you put the letter in the Post-office yourself ?—Yes.
With your own hands ?—Yes. -
Did you see that letter after in anybody's hands ?—Yes, next
morning I saw it in the Princess's hands.
Did you write another letter ?—Yes.
Was that letter also intercepted?
This question was objected to.
Did you ever see that letter in any other person's hands ?
'saw it, but it.was a long time afterwards. _
When you wrote the second letter, did you communicate
the contents to anybody ?—No.
Loan CHANCELLOR.—To whom was that .secund letter ad-
dressed ?—lt was not to Mr. Sachi, but to another name.

What name ?—I do not recollect Whether it was Pauchio or
some other name.

Now yoti have told us that you did not communicate the
contents of that letter to any body.; did her Royal Highness
ever say any thing to you about it ?—lt was after the second
letter that I was dismissed.

I ask, did her Royal Highness mention to you any of the
contents of the second letter ?—I do not recollect she men-
tioned any thing about the second letter.
Did you ever say the Princess was in love with Stiehl ?
—No. . • t•

Was the charge then that was made against you true or
false ?—lt was not true. '

Was her Royal Highness to your knowledge ever in love
with Mr. Sachi?

Mr. IVILLIAM s objected to the question.
,The SoLICITOR•GENERAL said, he wished to give the witness
an opportunity of words which had fallen from her on the pre-
ceding day. Yesterday the witness had said it was not true
that the Princess was ever in love with Mr. Sochi, and he
now wished to spew that she had never stated the fact.

Was the Princess, to your knowledge, in love with Sachi ?
Mr. WILLIAMS objected to the question.
At the time that the letter was produced by the Princess to
you, was any one else present ?—Yes, several other persons.
Where was M. Bergami ?—ln the same room with• her
Royal Highness.
.To what place was the first letter addressed ?—Te Milan.
How tar is it from Pesaro to Milan ?—You may travel in
two or three days, I think, by post.
I am speaking of the letter which you yourself put into the
post office. Is that it ?—Yes.
A letter has been produced, dated from Rimini, was it writ-
ten there ?—Yes.
How long after you left the Princess's house?—The same
day.
Have you written other letters to your sister?—Yes.
Few or many ?—Neither many nor few. I mean some.
Say about how many ?—Five, six, or seven.
While your sister was in the Princess's service ?—Yes.
Did your sister correspond witn you and your mother?—
We never had any news from my sister.
What do you mean ?—My sister never answered my letters.
Did you or your mother ever receive any answer to your
sister's letters from any body else ?—We received letters from
some other person in the name of my sister.
Do you know the handwriting of the Princess of Wales ?
Y es.
Do you know if any of the letters you received were in the
hand-writing of the Princess of Wales.
Mr. WILLIAMS objected to that question.
Is this ()tie of the letters ?—Yes. •
Do you believe it to be the hand-writing of the Princess of
Wales ?—The band-writinz resembles very much that of her
Royal Highness the Princess of Wales.
1 do not ask you to swear that it is in the hand-writing of the
Princess of Wales, but whether you believe it to be in her
hand-writing ?-1 believe it is her hand-writing.
Did you or your mother ever receive a letter in the hand-
writing of your sister ?—My mother received one while I was
at Milan in my sister's hand-writing.
You have said Bergami was present when the letter you
Put into the post-office was produced by her Royal Highness,
what did he say?—Bergami said, it was true that I had said,
that the Princess was in love with. M Sachi ? I made a pro=
posal to write to Mr. Sachi to know the truth, and Mr. Ber-
gami opposed it.
What else did lie do ?—M. Bergami accused me of having
passed a night in the corridor with M. Sachi.
What did you say to that?-1 answered, that my sister was,
present, and could say that I had slept with her.
Was your sister present ?—She was.
Had you slept with her ?—I had.
Was the charge made against you by Bergami true I—lt was'
not true.

Was any thing more done on it ?—No.
Was it true you did sleep with M. Sochi ?—No; with my
sister.
You have said two months ago you took an oath to a depo-
sition.?—Yes.
Who applied to you to•do so?—Mr. Powell applied to me
to swear to my deposition.
At the time you took that oath, did be explain for what
pttrpose you were to be sworn do not understand the
purport of that question.

- -
Mr. BROUGHAM objected to this. He thought the Solicitor-
General ought not to be allowed to call on witness to repeat
a conversation between her and Mr. Powell.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL did not wish to do that. He only
desired the witness to state for what purpose the oath had
been taken.
Mr. BROUGHAM did not object to this, but to her being
called upon to repeat the purport of the conversation which
bad passed between them.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL, repeated this had not been called
for.
The question was then repeated, and the re-examination
proceeded—l do not recollect what Mr. Powell said to me.
As nearly as you can recollect and try to recollect with
accuracy; bow lung was it ago ?—About two months, or
something more,
Was it after the Queen had arrived in England ?—Yes.
About bow long after ?—1 'do not recollect nearly what
time it was when the Queen arrived.
But though you .do not know exactly when the Queen ar-
rived, perhaps you know bow long was it after the Queen's
arrival, that you took the oath to the deposition 1-1 believe
it was not long after the Queen's arrival.
Had you ever heard of a Committee of the House of Lords ?
—Yes.
Was it after you had heard speak of that?—l think it was
after.
Before you took the oath was the deposition read over, or
did you read it ?—I read it myself.
Now, to go back for a moment to Naples! you mentioned

that you saw flergami in a satin corridor there in his shirt,
when you went out by the door ?—Yes.
After you went out, did you observe any thing done at the
door ?—I observed they shut it.
Was the door shut or locked ?—ft was shut on the inside.

Was it locked or not ?—When the door was shut I heard
them give a turn to the key. • " •
The Interpreter for the Defence rendered the answer,
" the key was turned on the inside." The words were then
taken down in French, " 071 ferMee, 4-e."
How long was it after the arrival of the Princess that you
began. to make the beds ?—Two months.

Who made the beds up to that time ?—Annette Bryson.
How long did you continue to make them ?—All the time
I remained at Naples.
How long did you remain there?—Three months.
There you made the beds; how long ?—Three months.
You have said Hieronymus's room door opened into the
corridore; was that the small interior corridors, or another
Another.

Was it a private corridore, or passage ?—lt was a corridore
which one passed to go to her Royal Highness's room, and by
which Hieronymus, William (Austin), and myself, went to
our rooms.

You have told us that on your first arrival here you went
by the name of Columbier. Why did you go by that name ?
—ln order to he mare private and peaceable.
Have you seen Hieronymus since the arrival of the Queen ?
Yes. On the stair-case where we lived.
Where was this ?-lt was when we lived in Dean-street.

When did he call on yon?--He called twice the same
morning.
How long ago was that as nearly as you can recollect ?
Seven weeks nearly.
Are these the only times he called on you ?—No.
You have heea asked about the Count Schavina.—When
servants left her Royal Highness was it his business to give
them characters?
Mr. BROUGHAM objected to the question.
What situation did Count Schavina hold ?—He was master
of the ceremonies at the last part of his time. . .

Mr. WILLIAMS said, that he never had cross-examined
upon what situation the Count held ; he only asked who
the Count was mentioned in the letter, and the Solicitor-
General had no tight to re-examine in the course he adopted.
A short conversation ensued, and the re-examination went
on as follows : _ . .

When servants left her Royal Highness was it the duty of
any person to give them characters ?—Yes.
Who was that person ?—Several times, I believe, it was
Count Schavina.

Was there a person in her Royal Highness's service whose
duty it was to give characters to the servants of the Princess
when they left 2 —Y es.
Who was that person ?—Sometimes Count Schavina gave
characters.

Lord LIMERICK.—On your examination in chief you were
asked, whether you could describe the situation in which you
found the large bed at Naples, after the second night atter
your arrival there, and you said you could not describe it; but
on your cross-examination by the Learned Counsel on the
succeeding day, as to the situation of the bed, you said you
could describe it, 1 wish to ask what was the situation of the
larger bed on the Morning after the second night after your
arrival at Naples.—l said I could not describe it because I
should have to make use of words that were not decent.

I wish to ask and to press the question distinctly on the wit-
ness. What was the situation of that bed I—The bed cover
was extremely pressed down in the middle, and there were
things on.the bed which I bad never seen before. •
The witness in answer to other questions went on to del
scribe what she bad alluded to, -which for obvious reasons we
omit, omit, except that she said there were large stains. -
By Lord De DUNSTANVILLE.—YOU have said Hieronymus
called at yotit residence in Dean-street I—Yes.
Why did he come?—l4.• not know exactly, because he
spoke to my sister.
The Earl of LivEiiPoet.f77,-Xop have said that the Princess's
dress, when she was at,W:7heatre San Carlos., was mon-
strous—what did you meariT-74t was a large ,dress of common
red stuff. •
What shape was it in ?—lt had no shape at all. .
During the ball at,the Barona, did you make any observa-
tion about the females ?—No.
Earl GREY—When the Princess told you to take your bed
out of her room, where did you spend the night?--I w:cat with
my bed into the room where my sitter was.
Did you go to bed ?—Yes, I. lay on my bed.
Were you dressed or undressed ?—I was part dressed.
When did you leave the inn, at what time?—About six
hours after.

You say, in the letter you wrote at Colombier, that the
Princess had spies. about her, was that true ?—I only know
the Princess said to we that she had spies and enemies about
her.

Mr. DENMAN read that part of the letter in which the wit-
ness stated that tlie Princess was surrounded lay spies.
Earl GREY—Is not the assertion you made in the letter that
the Princess's enemies acted with bitterness, and that she was
surrounded by spies, founded upon some fact you know of, or
do you mean it was merely written in consequence of what the
Princess said ?—lt was only written in consequence of what
the Princess said.
What ! call Colombier the capital of Europe I—Yes, some-
times in joke, when wilting to my friends.
And you then meant Colombier ?—I don't know now.
You say in your letter you wanted money, is it true or not ?
—I -.night not have money at home, but I could have got some
by writing to my guardian. •
Did you want money or not 1-1 do not recollect I had
money at home ; but I could have got it from my guardian.
Perhaps I had money at home.
Do you mean to say that you Were supported by your father
and mother after you were in the service of the Princess ?—I
paid my hoard to my parents for my maintenance.
Then you mean by the double entendre that you added
what was false to what was true ?—I did not do that in order
to say something which was false; but I did that because I
wished her.to understand what I could not clearly explain to
her, because I could not write openly and fully to her.
What did you mean to wish your sister to understand by
what you wrote ?—I wished her to understand, if she left the
Ps incess's service, that there was a situation for her.
What did you menu by saying to your sister that you could
have a princely fortune 1-13ecause I wished my sister to un-
derstand I would pay her expences to England.
And was it necessary to say the Princess was surrounded
by spies, to snake her understand ?—Yes, I did it to make her
understand that I would pay her expenses. I haVe always
said I would pay her carriage if she left the Princess's service.
Had you no other reason, but to make your sister under-
stand that you would pay her expenses I—And to inform her
I could take her to England, and get a situation for her if she
left the Princess.. _

You was afraid of your letter, being intercepted; that was
the reason you wrote mysteriously?—Yes.
In a letter you were afraid of being intercepted, you would
of course not put any thing injurious to the eln.racter 9f any
One ?—I should not. •
a read in
p e thisrs;
the House
Gentleman
why did you wish the names in the letter not to be
r
itit
mightmtgli t
go to
get into
the his
wife's ears.
You wished your sister to remain in the Princess's service ?
e :emarried,l was
afraid
ra
andid
—Yes.
After what you saw at the Barone, which you have de-
scribed ?—xes.
Marquis BUC6INGHAM.—Did you receive a letter promising
you a fortune if you came to England I—l received a letter
from Sicily, statingif I cattle to England I should be placed
advantageously.
Then, in fact, no suck offer was made ?—Not exactly as
stated in the letter; it alluded to the situation of governess.
At.Chamitz, you say, the Princess had a silk robe on iu
the day ; did she wear it at night?-1 cannot say.
When the Princess went down to the bath on board the
vessel, did you observe after any wet linen lying about ?—No,
I did not; but the Princess had bathed, and advised me to
bathe, as it would do me a great deal of good.
Where did the'Princess take the bath I—l believe it was
taken in the dining-cabin.
Lord'DEßßY—You say you wrote the letters to-your sister
mysteriously, being afraid the letter would be intercepted?—
Yes.
Had you acquainted your sister with the way.to understand
this mysterious writing without 'any other person being
ac-
quainted with it?-1 do not recollect ; hut the morning I set
out I agreed we should put marks to our letters, that nobody
should understand but ourselves. She told me she would put
some marks at the bottom of the letter) but I do not under-
stand what the marks were.
Lord LIVERPOOI..—Do you recollect the Princess bathing
more than once ?—Yes.
On one occasion was the bath in the cabin ?—I know 1
bathed in the cabin, but I do net know whether,her Royal
Highnesi did or not.
Lord ELLENBOROOOIL—WIIO did you
,suspect would read
your letters?—Bergami or the Princess.
Did you suppose either Bergami or the Princess would be
acquainted with the Swiii names mentioned in the letter ?
"thought the Princess knew one of them. (Witness men-
tioned the name.)
Why did you think the letters written to your sister would
be intercepted ?—Because a letter my sister had put into the

Pust-uffice at Pesaro to my mother, had been taken out and
altered.

You stated you saw the Princess come out of a room at Ca-
tania, where Bergami slept, was your sister in the room with
you ?—1 believe she was, .
How long had you been in the bed-room with your sister
—I hal 4reft there all nigbradd awake abritit two hours.
You say at General Pin,o7s you saw Bergami pass through
the room „while you were in ,e 4 and go into the Princess's
room, bow long was it ‘liefoii- you: went to ileep;'aTter she
passed through your room ?-4piarter or half an hour..
When yon saw Bergaiui come out: of his room in his shirt,
at Naples, and go towar4 !he Pt ineess"s room; how fat dis-
tant from you was lie ?—About ten or eleven paces.
Could Bergrimi hare eutered the Princess's room other-
wise iban by the door by which you escaped 1-41 e had no
need to pass by that door; he might go directly to the room
of the Princess,

On board the polacca, when you passed from yOur cabin to
that of the Princess, (during the voyage from Jaffa) ad. you
ever see Bergami's bed made in the dining cabin?-1 have
seen a bed in the cabin, but I cannot say whose, as other per-
soni slept there.

Have you ever seen Bergami sleep there ?—Not after the
return from Jaffa.

The 11.14tquess of LANsnowN.—Can you point out to the
House any marks in the letter which you agreed upon with
your sister ?

Here the SommTon-GENERAL stated that the .witness
begged permission to retire for a few minutes.
She was allowed to withdraw, and after au absence of half
an hour returned to the Bar.

The Marquess of Laysnow): then repeated his question.
Did the witness ever receive a letter troin her sister, con-
taining marks which. they had agreed should he communi-
cated, for the better explanation of each other's correspon-
dence ?—I have only received one letter from my sister, and.
I do not recollect whether there were any such marks in it.
If the witness did not receive from her sister any marks
agreed on between them, why did witness conceive her sister
would'he able to comprehend the double meaning in the let-
ter, without some such marks as those they had agreed on!--
These marbi bad never been agreed on, as far as I can recol-
lect; my sister said she should write to me, and put a mark
at the foot of her letter; I betieve she understood me, but I
do not recollect why she did.so; it is so long ago I cannot
recollect. •

The witness has said she received a letter inviting her to
go to England, where she might have the opportunity of
being placed in a situation as governess ?—Yes.
Was the letter anonymous or signed ?—The letter was trot
signed.
In what language was it ?—lt was in French.
By whom was the letter delivered to you have already
said it was delivered to me, but 1 do not recollect by whom.
Can you say whether it was conveyed by the post or a mes-
scnger ?—I do not rocollect by whom it was conveyed.
Can she say from whence it was dated 1-1 do not recollect.
In point of fact, does the -witness know, qr bad she reason
to know, by whom the letter was addressed to her?—At this
moment I cannol recollect whether 1 bad an idea at that ma-
tialannntfrroemcolvlleict.l on it came. I never thought of it after, and I
ot

Dbe return any answer ?—I do not recollect making anyanswer.ser.

Can the witness state any thing else in the letter besides
an incitation to her to go to England as Governess ?—I
not recollect whether there was any thing else.
'7' Has the witness the letter in her possession now ?—I hare
it not here, and I do not believe I have it at Colombier.
bUrnt all My letters.
F'!::Tlie Earl of LsunettetALe.—Was the invitaton in the ano-
-fli•itious letter an inducement for you to come to England as
Governess ?—I had thought of it before.
Did you ever get the place of Governess since you came to
England ?—No.
Was the letter directed to you or your mother ?—I cannot
positively say; but I think it was directed to my mother.
Hoiv many letters did your mother receive from your sister
before you left Pesaro ?—I cannot say how many she received.,
After the voyage up the Levant, did Bergami sleep in the
eating room and the Princess in a room adjoining?—Yes.
You have said on'two occasions where both the Prince's and
Bergami were in bed, you saw them speaking together; what
did they say ?-1 cannot recollect what they said, but they
were speaking together.
Lord FALMOUTH—With respect to the doable enteudre is
one of the letters, I wish to ask, whether the witness was sin-
cere in her phrases of the Princess, at the time she wrote the
letter, and whether the whole was double entendre, or only
passages in it ?—There were only some passages double enters.
dre,because when I wrote the letter I was extremely attached
to her Royal Highness, and willing to speak to her extreme
goodness and kindness.
The Earl of LAUDBRDALL—Was she sincere in those parts
of the letter which speak in praise of the Princess ?—Speak-
ingof the Princess as she was good and patient, I was sin-
cere.

Is there any phrase of this letter in which the witness was
not sincere ?-1 do not recollect whether all was sincere, bds
the greater paat was.
Earl DARNLEY.—When did her, attachment for the Prin•
cess cease ?—This attachment ceased when I heard several
things said of me in the house of her Royal Highness.
Was it in consequence of the cessation of that attachment
the witness is here to-day to give her evidence ?—No.
What was her motive—what her inducement to come here?
—I was asked to come to declare the truth.
By whom ?—By Mr. Sachi, on the part of the Commis-
sioners. _ _

Lord MoasToN asked whether the water in the bath, on
board the polacca was fresh or salt ?—The witness answered,
I do not know whether it was fresh or salt.

After a few other questions, the witness was
ordered to withdraw, and their Lordships ad.
journed at four o'clock to Monday.

From the LONDON GAZETTE of Sept..;

[This Gazette notifies the return of the Honourable Johts
Jocelyn, in the room of the Hon. R. Viscount Jocelyn, itow
Earl of Rodeo, as M.P. for the County of Louth.)
BANKRUPTS.
T. Evans, Birmingham, builder, Sept. 14, 15, and Oot.
14, at eleven, at the Wolseley Arms Inn, Wulseley, StaffOrdt,
shire.
J. P. Drummond, London-street, merchant, Sept. 5, 12:,
and Oct. 14, at twelve, at Guildhall.
W. Cruickshank, Of London-street, merchant, Sept. 5, 12,
and Oct. 14, at twelve, at Guildhall. • '
W. C. Wilson, London-street, merchant, Sept. 5, 12, and
Oct. 14 at twelve, at Guildhall.
[Dividends,' Ste. To-roorrow.l

To the PRINTER of the SHREWSBURY CHRONICI.B,
Sln,—The opening of the Ports for Foreign
Oats, is a circumstance which, I trust, will open
the eyes of my brother Farmers in the Maritime
Counties in Wales -viz. Merioneth, Carnarvon,
Cardigan, Flint, Denbigh, and Anglesey ; and
that they will see that bona fide returns be made_
of whatever Corn is sold. If a trick can b;ik
played in Oats, why not in Wheat ? The loss
which Ireland will sustain by the recent mat
nceuvre, is very great. Bat Farmers may thank
themselves. If they will not look to their own
interests, they must continue to become the dupe*
of speculators, who raise fortunes in a ferw
months. I do not believe, for instance, that even
in the markets of Shrewsbury or Chester, the
Farmers ever care about making a return of the
prices they sell at ; but they leave it to be done
by millers, or by any person interested.
,-Let
Farmers inquire more, and examine more, for.
themselves.----Your's,
Aug. 27.

A WELSH FAAMER.

6. aa
In the Gazette of Saturday a reward is offered
of 100 guineas for the discovery ofperson
the ,
who attacked Dr. WAKE'. 1-, of Argyle-street,
and set fire to his house, with a promise of a
free pardon to any accomplices making such dis-
-oai ng mian of the n the
covert'.
The late Vice-Admiral FENDEA who died a
o in
the 73d year of his age, had ,been
Royal Navy, and was the last re-
m crew who circumnavigated
the Globe with Captain WALL4cx„