The Sun.
London, England, 1845-06-18 00:00:00

LEEDS AND WEST RIDING RAILWAY.

A NOBLE LORD presented a petition in favour of the Leeds
and West Riding Railway Bill.
Lord STANLEY presented a petition from the General
Assembly of Canada, praying for some alteration in their com-
mercial relations with this country.
LANDLORDS AND TENANTS (jRELAND) COM-

PENSATION
Lord STANLEY postponed the second reading of the Irish
Landlords and Tenants Compensation Bill till Tuesday next.
DEATHS BY ACCIDENTS COMPENSATION BILL.

On the motion of the Earl of LYTTELTON, the Death by
Accidents Compensation Bill was read a third time and passed.

DEODANDS ABOLITION BILL.

On the motion of Lord CAMPBELL. the Deodands Aboli-
tion Bill was read a third time and passed.
Earl POWIS objected to the Bill.
Lord HATHERTON said Canal Companies were in favour
of the measure, and that it originated from a deputation of

their body, which met last year in London. The Board of
Trade were satisfied with the measure. Mr. Gladstone
had taken it into his own hands, and it passed through the
other House without any objection being raised to it.
After a few words from Lord DALtroustE and Lord Powts,
the Bill was read a third lime and passed.
CANAL COMPANIES CARRIER'S BILL.
On the motion of Lord HATHERTON, this Bill was read a
third time and passed.
EDUCATION IN IRELAND.
The Bishop of CASHEL rose to present the petition of
which he had given notice, with respect to Education in Ire-
land. After presenting a number of petitions from several
places in Ireland, against the present system of national educa-
tion in that country, he said that there was one petition to
which he begged to call the special attention of their Lord-
ships. It was signed by 1,360 clergymen of the Established
Church in Ireland, who earnestly prayed that some por-
tion of the public funds should be given for the schools
in connexion with the Church Establishment. The
Right Rev. Prelate then referred to the changes which
had taken place from time to time in the documents which
emanated from the Board of National Education, relative to the
reading of the Scriptures, and contended that it was dangerous
for Protestant children to aatend these schools. He then read
the opinion of the late master, who had given up his situation
at the London University because the pupils would not be per-
mitted to be examined in their knowledge of the Scriptures.
This eminent man had designated this proceeding the " Anti-
Christ of utilitarian unbelief." The Rev. Mr, Woodward
had also pointed out the danger which attended Protestant
children by this mixed system of education. He could men-
tion, too, the name of a gentleman whose name had already
been before their Lordships. He meant the Rev. Mr.
Mackesey, who, in writing from Monksland, on the subject of
establishing a Protestant school in that place, to a neighbouring
vicar at Clonmel, said he was favourable to the national sys-
tem in so far as considering it the next best thing when it was
impossible to establish an Episcopal school. Mr. O'Connell
had lately expressed himself against a united system of edu-
cation, and, in a most extraordinary paper, put forward by the
bench of Catholic bishops, the youth of Ireland were exhorted
not to attend any of the lectures of the national schools, unlesa
they were delivered by members of the Roman Catholic
Church. The only Society which had yet established a suc-
cessful plan of mixed education was the Church Education
Society, who had founded upwards of 18,000 schools, and who
annually educated 800,000 children, 32,000 of whom be-
longed to the Roman Catholic Church.—( Hear, hear. )
He referred to a case in which the priest of a parish in Ire-
land denounced the parish school from the pulpit, on account
of the education pursued in it, and the very next day the school-
master was murdered in the streets of the town. Since the
establishment of the Educational Board ignorance had increased
instead of being diminished. From 1701 to 1631 education
increased ; but from that time to the present it had gradually
descended to zero.—(Laughter.) He referred at great length
to the report of the Census Committee to bear out these state-
ments. Through that Board, which was supported at an ex-
pense of 70,0001. a year, they were indebted for the ignorance
which prevailed in Ireland at the present moment ; and, be-
sides, it had displaced, and rendered in a great measure una-
vailable, the exertions of charitable institutions founded for the
promotion of education in Ireland. As a sample of the incom-
petent persons who were appointed to conduct education in
the statistical schools in Ireland, he said a man, named Trim,
who had deceived and humbugged some Protest persons as pro-
fessing their faith when it was found that he was a hypocrite—
was appointed to the mastership of one of those schools.
When incompetent persons were appointed to such important
offices, how could they expect education to flourish ?—( Hear. )
He would therefore say that there was more chance of kindness
from the Roman Catholics of Tipperary than they had from
the Parliament of Great Britain.—( Hear, hear.) He con-
sidered that thorough education could never be carried out
until they acted up to the spirit of the seventeenth report of
the Commissioners who had been appointed to inquire into the
state of education in Ireland, and again established the paro-
chial schools.

The Earl of ST. GERMANS deaired to make a few re-
marks on the speech of the Right Rev. Prelate who had just
sat down. From his connexion with Ireland he was enabled to
say that the proposition which had just been made to their
Lordships was one which they could not assent to. The Right
Rev. Prelate had found fault with the construction of the
Board of National Education, but he forgot that the money
which was appropriated for this education was taken from the
whole community, and not from any particular sect ; and he
(the Earl of St. Germans) considered that all parties should
be represented at that board. Great objection had also been
made in reference to the reading of the Scriptures. Now, he
contended that the Board of Education had used every endea-
vour to meet the wishes of all parties in reference to this
point. They neither enforced the reading of the Scriptures,
nor did they preclude their admission from the na-
tional schools of Ireland. They certainly provided that no
child, whose parents objected to his being present at any
religious instruction, should be present while such instruction
was being given, and for that purpose they appo nted particular
times for the communication of this instruction, different from
the time set apart for the ordinary literary instruction ; but
while they did so ample provision was made that all children
should have such religious instruction as accorded with the
wishes of their parents or natural guardians. It was rather
strange, too, that the Right Rev. Prelate had objected so much
to the reading of the scriptural extracts, for he found that the
Bishop of Down and Connor had, in a sermon which be
preached some time ago, denounced the reading of the Holy
Scriptures without note or comment by children in schools.
There was one circumstance which he considered ought to
have considerable weight with their Lordships. The Pres-
byterians were not less attached to the Bible than the members
of the Established Church; and it was notorious that throughout
the whole extent of Ireland the Presbyterians had supported
the present system of national education, believing, as they
did, that the free circulation of the Scriptures was amply pro-
vided for. There were 944 schools in Ireland in which the
Scriptures were read, and 1,340 schools in which the scriptural
extracts were read, but all the books which were used con-
tained a body of sound religious instruction. Time would not
permit him then to read a few extracts from them, but he
hoped to do so on a future occasion, and he
was quite sure that their Lordships would be agree-
ably surprised to see the kind of books which had
been so much denounced.—( Hear, hear.) The Right Rev.
Prelate had alluded to Mr. Woodward. His opinions, how-
ever, might be quoted as much against the Church education
system, which the Right Rev. Prelate had advocated, as
against the Board of National Education. He was opposed to
a united system of education, and he war also of opinion that if
the main body of the clergy in Ireland could speak out, they
would be found to be in favour of the national system of educa-
tion at present in Ireland. The Noble Lord here recited the
opinions of the vicar of Newry with respect to the state of edu-
cation in schools which he had visited, and which were to the
effect that the children were well informed in the Scriptures,
and were receiving a good education. He (the Earl of St.
Germans) therefore held that the fault was not in the system
of education itself, but in those who did not lend their aid to
carry it out with greater efficiency, and that the assertions of
the Right Rev. Prelate were incorrect. He considered that
the statement of the Right Rev. Prelate, that a Mr. Osborne
had refused a site for a school, was not unlike the conduct of
other landowners. He held that the extraordinary statement
that education had diminished during the last ten years was
fallacious, and must have arisen from some misstatement on the
part of the Board of Education. It was absurd to say that
education had decreased, for great exertion had been made to
disseminate school books, and to extend education in Ireland.
He entreated the House to pause before they gave a consent to
the proposition of the Right Rev. Prelate, for it would hava
the effect of destroying the National Board, and would lead
to serious consequences, not only to the Protestant but to
the Roman Catholic religion.

The Marquis of NORMANBY said he had excellent op-
portunities, during the four years he was Lord Lieutenant of
Ireland, of becoming acquainted with the course of edu-
cation pursued in the schools, and could bear testimony to
the good effects of the National Board of Education in Ire-
land. The Noble Marquis then read a long letter of the
Rev. Mr. Mackesey, respecting his conduct in the parish of
Nlonksland, in which he performed clerical duties during the
temporary absence of the minister, and to his subsequent re-
buke by the Bishop of Cashel, at his visitation at Lismore, in
which he positively asserted that he was so rebuked because he
made some suggestions with respect to the schools in that parish.
He was sorry that the Right Rev. Prelate had thought proper
to allude to the circumstance again, because he believed their
Lordships had been willing to allow the matter to rest with the
explanation he had given on a former occasion, in behalf of the
Rev. Gentleman. There was no other point upon which he
wished to correct the Right Rev. Prelate. The Right Rev.
Prelate was under the impression that the schools of the Right
Rev. Dr. Henry, of Armagh, were confined to the children of
one sect only, but the Right Rev. Prelate was never more
mistaken.

The Earl of WICKLOW thought their Lordships' time hail
been too long occupied with this correspondence, considering
that the circumstance to which it related was of a trifling and
unimportant nature. But the Right Rev. Prelate had re-
peatedly explained the matter, and he hoped their Lordships
would hear no more of it. (Hear, hear.) Now, for one
word on the subject immediately under discussion. Their
Lordships would, doubtless, remember that when the national
system of education was first proposed he did not object to its
principle ; but he objected to its introduction then, because it
went to destroy one of the most useful and beneficial systems
of education that had ever prevailed in Europe. He meant
the Kildare-street Society, which, at the time, was rapidly
advancing in Ireland. The question was, then, what
was to be done under existing circumstances. A more inju-
dicious thing could not be done than to destroy the national
system. Theoretically it was excellent, and if it were properly
used he knew nothing that would tend more to advance the in-
terests of Ireland; but unfortunately it was not so. Unfor-
tunately it was decidedly opposed on its introduction, and that
opposition had been continued down to the present time. The
result had been that the system had proved a failure, and so it
would remain, until the Government consented to accede to
the prejudices, if they would have it so, of the Church people,
and placed the schools intended for the instruction of Protestant
children under the control of the Church School Society.
While acting most judiciously, most wisely, and most politi-
cally to a great portion of the Roman Catholic people of Ire-
land, let Ministers show to those connected with the Church of
England in that country that they did not forget them. Let
them do this, and they would give universal satisfaction to the
people that were now arrayed against them, and they would at
the same time show that they were not inflamed by a strong
bias in favour of any powerful party in that country. Let them
do this and they might rely upon it the people would begin to
think that the great object they had in view was to hold the
scales of justice with an even, steady, and impartial hand.
After a few words in explanation from the Marquis of Non-
MA NBY and the Earl of CLANCAnTY, which did not reach the
gallery,
Lord MONTEAGLE said he was rejoiced to hear the Noble
Lord, who had just addressed the House, bear important testi.
mony to the efficacy and practicability of the national system
of education. The Noble Lord's testimony was of no small
importance, because there was no one who had had better op-
portunities of observing its operation than the Noble Lord, and
no one who was more disposed to discuss the question before the
House with greater impartiality. It appeared to him (Lord
Monteagle) that the Noble Lord had by his excellent address
completely overturned the studied and pains-taken
arguments of the Right Rev. Prelate upon the subject. That
was no small extent of religious instruction, comprising, as it
did, extracts from the Acts of the Apostles, the Gospel of
St. Luke, and all the principal passages of the Old Testament.
He would now compare the system of the Kildare-street So-
ciety with the present system of national education, and their
Lordships would at once see that the school in connexion
with the latter Society was far superior, even in point of reli-
gious instruction, to those of the former Society. The Noble
Lord then read the opinion of Mr. Beevers, the secretary of
the former Society, to corroborate this opinion. He (Lord
Monteagle) thought, that by providing support for the Church
Education Society, they would be setting up a sort of anta-
gonism in education in Ireland, which would be attended
with the most pernicious consequences. He was sorry to see
so many as 1,700 of the Protestant Clergymen of Ireland, who
still protested against that system of education there. He knew
the difficulties which the Government had to contend with,
in opposing a request which had been made by so respectable
a body of individuals. He thought, however, that they were
par tly themselves to blame in contributing to induce the belief,
on the part of those persons, that on their accession to power
they would either abandon the best system of education in Ire-
land or allot a portion of the public funds for the support of
schools in connexion with the Church Education Society.
The working, however, of the system was the best refutation
which could be given to those who were opposed to it.
The Earl of CLANCARTY said that as he had presented a

number of petitions in favour of the Church Education Society,
he was desirous of giving his support to the proposition which
had been introduced by the Right Rev. Prelate. .'Huth had
been said derogatory to those clergymen who had opposed the
presen system of education. but no one could question the
since et feelings by which they were influenced. The Noble
Lord then proceeded to spate the opinions of Sir R. Peel, se
expressed by him, in 1839, against the present system of pa'
tional education. Had not then (continued the -Noble Lord)
the clergy of the Established Church good ground to hope that
on the accession of the Right Hon. Baronet some change wale
be made in that system ? Sir Robert Peel, however, was not
alone in the expression of such an opinion. The Right Hoe;
Baronet the Secretary for the Home Department had also!1_
a speech made about the same time, given utterance to a sinul!!
disapprobation of the present national system of education la
Ireland. In conclusion he hoped the Government would or_
Sider what was their duty to the established religion of the
country.
The Archbishop of DUBLIN said he would not enter at.
length into the subject, but would state some of the results:l
his experience, which might have the effect of dissipating so„.e
of the misapprehensions which prevailed on the subject.
had held his office as one of the Commissioners of the Nation
Board of Education under seven Lords Lieutenants and
Secretaries for Ireland, and during the whole of that pen for
had always considered it his duty to serve the Government not
the time being to the best of his ability, so long as it did
compromise his conscience, and he had always considered it
the
duty of those who held offices like the one he held to '"7,
aloof from all political parties.—(Cries of " Hear. hea rbe
When the present Government came into power
applied to them to state their intentions with sere;
to education in Ireland, and their not declaring :I'4
intentions for some time he considered one of the
stioa
should
rant
apathy on the part of Protestants with regard to edu.
in Ireland. It was proposed that an additional g
be made to the Church Education Society. Let them as
sides what would be the immediate results of such the:',Porg
that. Its adoption would lead to the secession from
s__se
of its Protestant, and of the most influential of it num,sti
Catholic members, and two rival systems of educaticni
noiald
be established in Ireland. He denied that the system ct..l!
not
education had failed. If that mode of education dl°
exist, man lare stricts in Ireland would not have the
benefits of educetion di
afforded to them at all To suppooru
't4e
systems of education out of the funds of the State, sv_
an Irish system of Government. It was totally on that fou",
the
tion that the Scriptures were excluded from these school:ad
supposition arose from scholars not being forced t°, ontrary
Scripture, that no child was compelled to read them est., net
to his parent's wishes ; but to say that the Scriptures wel were
read was untrue, as Scriptural lessons, carefully preP.__.,d with
used in all the schools. Anything that they had ilea'to read
respect to Dr. Arnott's wishing to force the scholar!
ar
s'o the rea
thed.
of ..
the Scriptures was untrue, as he was of opinion that ;r
in g of them by children should be optional on the Pbm hid
parents. He could assure their Lordships that no opted,
taken place in the system or principles of educatiouwbich
bsd
except in the rules for the guidance of the teachers,
cruse, for
been improved from time to time, as the necessitc, abeen
the purpose of carrying it out with greater effect. , of the
said that they paid little or no attention to the boon' without
Board, and that they signed papers and docuraelere could
knowing anything at all of their contents. ~„;ti, 001
not be anything more at variance with the truth. s• proanst 0
of the Board took place without himself and the were en.
Trinity College being in attendance, and often the is of the
gaged in corresponding for days with various Pts„ortlas
country on the business of the Board. But thist;grio blie
e
only one of the many unfounded statements rela
Board, which had, unfortunately, tended to abuse,4 tuition!l
mind of England and Scotland on' the subject of the their
schools of Ireland. Let the system have a fair trial, and the re•
Lordships might depend upon- its one day resulting
wbo had
demption of the Irish people. prelate +i as
Lord STANLEY said the Right Rev. objee-fs,►
just sat down had so completely answered the
raised to this system by the Noble Lord who P the Part not
that he should have felt it wholly unnecessarY dat had it
iue
the Government to say a word upon the subieput the far
been for one or two remarks which had fallen, • Ile the
Noble Earl and the Right Rev. Prelate himsel'ortoce
from being insensible of the great value and inlP-carrYiessgrof
services rendered by the Right Rev. Prelate ills surea• ht
this system of education, because he believed °et the 1,;
that system owed a great deal to the serv, jesieg sr. Surrasp,
aßnedv.hl: r(l;leagtegeadudtothaastsutrliesttihnegmui,shtehdatinidfi
whatever to doubt that it was the intention othe 0 se
ay tee' he ,„0
to support and maintain the existing -is But sus Pr•
tion in Ireland, they were mistaken the 'lint to
sure neither the Right Reverend Gentlealle es, not Or, to be
Murray had any such apprehension, and it "1:"„ing till‘before
say anything to clear the doubts of others, e"-he systetn
toed
had the hononr in the first instance to brirSt onstueqlu, res
Parliament, and had ever since given it of We' •n of
support, it would be inconsistent and
main in a Government which had thettnwor. Yt in arisen
bed
arkat
abandoning that system. He admitted that d°°°:,etable that
and r t.lhsyfteert it tore%
attn. restio
on the subject, and no doubt to that it was an aPP I 1,04
mGaodveernmthent
thehmad
bhesitated
lartgoe accede influential 'pat
of the Irish clergy to extend the vvorking °'
Noble Lords must remember that GovernMehe,- to extend
•
their duty to inquire whether it was practica-'we as any fount;
system, as well as to ascertain whether there e
th working d
tion for certain alleged existing abuses in of the sYsterie
system. They did examine into the h d been 100,
they did examine fully into the progress that
moreover,
the national schools—they did examine'
working
a.
the gran!---erut
anxiously whether it was possible to in
..reitostery,
having come to the conclusion that the system Ras
with fairness, that its influence was extending da1...411;1W
that the numbers educated in the schools were rreaing:
creasing, and that the quality of the education was no
and tteY et°
they felt that they were justified in proposing, _ou_ rste
since proposed, not a continuance only of
but a large and liberal increase in the amount
increased.tav
Odor.,
and if there was any doubt as to the fixed determi
„.,d the
the prevoi_ es_ Ist.ant.
est" WO
the part of the Government, to maintain and
old 5
system of national education in Ireland, he to
that he had lately seen a letter from the Prime Mini. :rod that
Lord Primate of Ireland, wherein it was distinctly St
pt.
11
there was no such intention on the part of the Governp3e, 0/0
Noble Earl who spoke late in the debate bad stated thai;.4ter
was no hope of an alteration taking place amongst the ~.teeo
tants of Ireland on this subject, because it involved a tle"aaity
of Protestant principle. Now, if he thought this sYsten tit'
valved a question of principle, not only would he abatneetsi
system, but he would become one of its strongest opP°-00
No, it was because he thought the fears of the Protest that
Ireland were founded in misapprehension, and in the 11, 'deter
this apprehension would be erased with time, he had st"„ t,
mined to give the system his best and most hearty suPPJperi°',
The Duke of WELLINGTON confessed that at one bet
the
of his life he was averse to all systems of mixed
his opinion was changed while he sat on the other side ;001
House, and ever since that time he had strenuously 1,4
all the motions that had been made for the augmentat%
grant, and had always endeavoured to induce those weDeatio
he had any influence to countenance the system 01, sarriet;
education in Ireland.—(Hear, hear.) lie alw„ssaYsed ion
into execution every measure, when once tt r---al Ow
a law, whatever might be its consequences as a legion, 'l'4,
went. Now he applied that maxim to these clerg..,„regle
come forward to the number of 1,700, to call for acnZy.
tion of the public funds to the Church Education
‘re Gose,r;ia;
national education had obtained the support a tbitueoglit,a."-se,
mint, the Queen, and the Legislature, and he
stems t ';beif
however they might continue to denounce the sf totes,
ent
ter-hall and elsewhere, with their voices, their they st'
ph,
speeches, and their writin g th shou1:1, whieje gear asi
home to their own parishes,g-Carryeyinto effee.t, 'oifetheb•gb
jects, a measure which had obtained the sanction
legal authority in the land.—( Hear, hear.) for tbe 0715
Lord DACRE moved that the order of the daY it beige°
reading of the game-laws be discharged, and that
on again on Monday, the 27th inst.
Their Lordships then adjourned.

-
iTSINS
P ,d
PARLIAMENTARY )3
TUESDAY, JUNE 17. meets
The following Bills, with further aelenuuldipg °P.
were referred to the Select Committee on Stau
Londonderry and Coleraine Railway.
Londonderry and Enniskillen Railway. d). A°
Great Southern and Western Railway (Irelan
rail'
The Glasgow, Garnkirk, and Coatbridge
read a third time and passed.

nortedlso'
Standing Orders Committee,—Resolution Irof
" That, in the case of the Epping
petition, the Standing Orders ou i..:ht to be uisrtoit
That the parties be permitted to proceed Iv°
0
Resolution agreed to. 0 6eo
------
pot
NOTICES GIVEN AT THE PRlVAirseieci3too.freletf,/
Monmouth and Hereford Railway,
Group (P.) adjourned till Wednesday, Jailall Du,
North Union and Ribble Navigation 13,1.7dg:if-I- P'jlly
Committee on re-committed Bill, Friday P5(111P
Eastern Counties Railway (Clinbricl4e 800"
mund's Extension),—Committee on Bill
23, at twelve.

AO in.
..,..dfoP

ter? otw°
On Saturday last, a specimen of 9 -,„1101,,,1103:,01°
our seas, called the " Angel Fish," was caught,' Agn.lll in: this
Sands, Immediately on being taken, it voich7i ggener...oo t
fish. It is of the squalus, or shark genus, 3niiielie:oPl:i;ol
the northern seas. It is the opinion among
fish does not spawn, but brings forth its Young. el
we think, erroneous, arising from the circutostnt ogb ivve
always retreating into the stomach of the 1,31:61, 0 AD°
danger ; and hence the voidance of the Young
—Cambrian.

7----- siliT
..forth
On the 17th inst., at BIRTH
CBbarles-street'
_,,„t 'fp.x°l‘
tono-
isiptiahree,
borough-street, of a son.'
1113Itrhs. li-Inusttc,hitshoen,loafdya doaiug.._,hter., ~ Ji. 67,- ,A,
, fir. Ow" of
On the 13th inst., at Hyde-park-scluare' tiet Birw
'
IScli
the
Liam Longman, Esq., of a son, still-bora., ardsto ,
On the 13th inst., at Yardley House, 'Sewer
Mrs. Speed Davies,of a fr 0
f Will
lady 0 a.
On the 13th inst., in Abin.gdon-street, tbo ft; se-ef
Currey, Esq., of a son 11 ().
vie t sft
11I133n4ttnthloinifinsnasts.t,.,althHeillliandgydoonf, 11JI.rEs..tcurtis, 0,
L i OoOn cinnio lttnthhh'eese teveilto
On the 14th inst. MacdOn3la , ii'll.
Esq., of a daughter. "
stomthe lady of R. W.".
gre. of J.
Goodeve,
kinson, of a daughter. .re tile Aiter'
On the 14th inst., in Kensington:Wl-- ' oaf.
, at Woodberry DosYn, lag
it' eOO
Esq., of Lincoln's Inn, barrister, of li fillr
211.4./ill/El)., .„, 33enj5e1,,,,. of
,On the 10th inst., at Brighton, Jo-11 daugll`" 10
Esq., to Miss Eliza Mar Mason, youngest
trey. 1
si j0,,4.
Rev. George Mason, of Walton Rectory, Su h, Ece ;.riiiier'.
On the 13th inst., at the parish eborecrit, to
ri 0,
llinde, Esq., of the Bth or King's Rgliendlet°looti,eo
daughter of Richard Gould, Esq., of Hope sory„isoi of
On the 14th inst., at St. GeorE,--e's, 1310!...01ure t 0 'pl.,
Downing, Esq., of Euston-place, Eu5t00.,74 park' liot,
Jackson, youngest daughter of the late Jou J. 11(10
Montague street, Russell-square. . rkenwell,
00, ex
On the 12th inst., ate t. James's, C'Tizabetla i" billi
Esq., of Wissett Lodg Suffolk, to L 01 Cr 4
daughter of Mr. George Biggs. ics Wil!iii voe"
On the 14th inst., at Burnham, Bui,clieopbila' ''
Buee, Esq., of Slough, Bucks, to Matild
daughter of W. Robarts, Esq., of Burnham.
• n, fto'
DIED. peter son..eiiiii,
On the 12th inst., in Burton-creseentiu,orstoelc 0(
On the 12th inst., at Struan House, . We
Samuel Boxill, aged 91. EA',
ltieg'
r P
On the 15th inst., William Matthiesseo,
chow
Herne-hill, aged 60. E• 0f the
On the 15th inst., John Willis, sq , ,artib3,
Kennington. Eisigorthf '-'
On the 15th inst., at the Rectory,. , of
Rev. Oliver Lodge, rector of that parish.
-Yotlsvilf'
muRDO - So. „,- of
!, ;: 'A) n . L'rieited anu eubi!shed bY •,...., _ offick,,,„oo4
N;;. 112, Strand. Printer, at The 0" :
... tur.,v
Strand. in the Precinct of the SaveLY.o"
Middlesex, Wednesday, June.lB,,i 845

t