The Sun.
London, England, 1829-02-11 00:00:00

DIVIDEINDS.

Ann Bags, Shrewsbury, Salop, linen•mannFaeturet•,
March 5, at eleven, at the Talbot Hotel, Shrewsbury.
Thomas Watson Gill and John Loake Gill, Coventry,
mercers, March 2, at twelve, at the King's Head Inn,
Coventry.

William Bailey Fox, Crawfiord•sti.,et, Marylebone, oil
and colourrnan, Mareh 3, at eleven, at the Court of Com-
misaionerd.

John Cullen Knott, Ashford, Kent, ironmonger, Mareh
6, at twelve, at the Court of Commieiioners.

Thomas Evers}!s?d, liforshaoi, Sussex, soap-maker,
March 10, at teo, at the Court of Commissioners.

James Pegg, Wool-nom, Bnekinghammhire, paper-maker,
March 3, at two, at the Court of Commiwiionerg.

John Holiday, Jelemiab Savage, and Thomas Gitindy,
Preston, Lancashire, machine-makers, March 5, at eleven,
at the office of Mr. Heydock, solicitor, heater].
John Gibbon, 'en., Canton-piace, Commercial-road,
Middlesex, mast and block-maker, March :3, at ten, at the
Court of Commissioners.

John Jenner and John Wharton Soppet, Greek-stieet,
Soho, drapers, Mard► 3, at ten, at the Court of Commis
tioners.

Joseph Wilaou ;Ad Jolla Wilson, SLrewsbury, Salop,

EXETER i'.lAl
Beef (score) los. Od. lh. 6d.
Nutton (lb.) U 6—o 6
Veal and c.urub 0 o—o 0
nrk 0 6 —0 7
Geese (each) 4 0 —6 IS
Ducki (coup e) 4 o—3 6
lowa 3 0

KE l'S.—Feb R.

Wheat (busbe.) 118.0 d. lls (1.
Barley 4 6—4 0
Oats I 2 —3
Beans " 0 —0 0
Butter (lb) 1 2—l 3
Eggs (14) 0 11 —1 (1
Potatees (pe:k) 10 —1 0

BRITISH EXPORTS.

Statement of the Quantities of the under-mentioned Arti-
cles of British Manufacture Exported from Liverpool,
from the 30th ult, to the 6th inst. inclusive.
Cotton 145,219 Pieces. 2,580,209 Yards.
Linen
Blanketing 4B ... 9,7(10
Carpeting
Calicoes
Kerseymeres.
Flannel
Woollen Stuffs ..... 401
Worsted Stuffs 7,522
Baize
inferior Woollens 1,490
Cotton Thread 12,59011a,
Cotton Yarn
Sail Cloth
Cotton Hose
Cotton Handkerchiefs
Cotton Bluets
Worsted Cap
Hats

- ..,
SG6 Ends.

1,209
Ellto.
2,572 Doren.
63 ...
67 ...

Hardware
Earthenware .
Salt, White
Salt, Hoek
Cottle 276 Tons, I?, Cwt. 0 Cltl.
Iron 521 ...

.£9,b18
£4,385
$2,011 13nsh.

CATTLE.
An Account of Cattle imported into Liverpool from the
2d to the 7th inst., both days included.
Cows Calves Sheep Pigs Horses Mules
238 72 1,476 2,685 22 0

On Monday evening a quarrel arose among
some ►aen wbo were drinking in a public-house in Liver-
pool, when one of them named Hugh Jones, got. a num.
na:ntd Morris on the floor', and hit off the end of one of
his fore argent by the joint, spilt it out of his month, and
attempted to force out. one Of his vietirn'a eyes, ns be lay
writhing in agony on the floor. The bye-standers how-
ever, interfered.

The LORD Citatecartoa took ,his seat, at five minutes
past five o'clock. •
The Bishop of DURHAM presented a petition from
Alnwiek, against concessions to the Roman Catholics.
The . Duke or RUTLAND, is presenting .a petition
againit Catholic Emnneipation from the inhabitants of
Leicester, obset ved that if the persons had known of the
measures in contemplation, It would not have infineuced
their votes. The Noble Lord had long been of opinion
that no alteration could ever, be made in the law which
would contain those securities for the Catholics which
they had a right to expect. lie kno,v the great impor-
tance of the measure, and he could place as touch cond-
denee in his Noble Friend at the, head of his.Mnjesty's •
Government as
.one man could place. in another. Ho
-zero -hint great credit for a conscientious conviction
of the imperious necessity of adopting son-at measure ; bet
until It was brought before their Corilships,....until the
'whole war tendered to them, it was his intention to
evait before ho expreised any opinion. Ile felt it due to the
high quarter front which the 'recommendation ealup, be felt
it Otte tO,ltis Noble Fn fend, to wait tilt that period. .He
could not conceive that any thing could give him greater
pain than to diflis in any point from his Majesty's Govern.
meat.. This was a 'pain:he would Most certainly not
slightly and net willingly undergo; it was a pain which
he would studiously avoid, unless he were compelled by
the balance of a greater hear)—the pain of
appearing to depart from the consistency of the principles
and sentiments which ha hid long uninterruptedly, and he
might say enthusiastically, entertained. He disclaitned,
hOwever, any intention of withdrawing his support gene-
rally from the present Governmer, which•he confided in
as much as any Government that illpener wielded the
energies of England. The Noble Du a Concluded by pre-
senting other petitions anitinst the Catholics, from Gran-
tham, Wenlock, and Worksworth.
Lord LONGFORD had the honour to hold in his hand
tieri petitions, one from the Protestants of the town and
ncighbonrhood of Longford, and the other from a place in the
county of Longford, against concession to the Catholic"; The
one was signed by nine hundred, and the other by upwards
of five hundred persons. Both petitions prayed the
attention of the House to the suppression of the Catholic
Association, to which they ascribed most of the diffieultiet
into which Ireland had been 'plunged, and which they
had every reason to believe, from the tenor of the Speech
from the throne, would now soon he put an end to.
The petitioners also prayed the consideration of the
Honse to the forty-shilling freeholders, to which they
principally attributed the calamities of Ireland, and also to
the other laws which enabled the freeholders to vote. His
Majesty's Ministers had taken the most extravagant view
of the results, said to be the consequences of emancipation.
If he could believe, and he would answer ou the part
of the petitioners whom he now advocated—if he could
believe that it would he productive of any good effect,
he should he one of the first to support it. But he thought
it was holding out a fond and delesive hope which never
could be realised. He had lived all his life in that country
where discord had taken her stand, and where she had
upheld measures inconsistent with the Constitution. He
had watched its progress, and he could not but observe•
that ever since that Association had existed, those scenes
of horror were very much increased. He bad watched
with the anxious feelings of one whose whole posses-
sions lay there, and he could not conceive that any
effectual good would result from the measure proposed
to their Lordships. He would not deceive himself by
holding out a hope that any good would result. He firmly
believed that thwattloption of this recommendation would
be the signal for discord and jealousy. It would occasion
exulting triumphs in the breasts of the Catholics, while
the ewe to the Protestants would be proportionately ap-
palling. It would not be opening the door to conciliation,
but the sluice-gates, the tide-way to collision. He thought
the.measu re unwise and foolish, and urworthy the
.cause it
professed to advocate.—(Hear, hear, hear.) If we heal
been deceived we had been so by our too long
blind confidence and hopes in Alinisters. It would, how-
ever, afford us a lesson how to place farther reliance on
them.

The Duke of WELLINGTON—I cannot avoid
troubling your Lordships with a few observations in eonse-
queace of what has fallen from my Noble relative. I shall avoid
any disi.ession on the present occasion, either on the measure
called Catholic Emancipation, or those which I have.
thought it my duty to propose to his Majesty, but I cannot
avoid observing upon those remarks with which the
Noble Earl closed his speech. I mutt way my Noble re-
lation, in dieenseing this question so much at large, might
as well when he stated to you the situation in which he
left that part of the United Kingdom, have stated whether
ho had any measures to propose, or in his contemplation,
in order to remove the various arils under which that
country labours and has laboured.--( Hear, hear, hear.)—
I considered myself as performing a duty which I owed to
my country in humbly submitting to his Majesty our ad-
vice that he should duke his Parliament to take this
Question into his consideration. My Lords, my Nob!e
Relative complains of the concealment of my sentiments on
this occasion. But my Noble Relative cannot, if he recol-
lects himself, say that I have concealed my sentiments, for
I have declared repeatedly before your Lordship* that I
wished to see this question fully settled.—(Hear, hear.)—
I beg, however, to inform my Noble Relative, that though
it was my wish to see this question settled, it was say de-
termination—l may have a peculizte taste iu this—but it
has long been my determination never to vote for Catholic
Emancipation, if it were not brought before Parliament
for consideration by the Government, actine, as a Govern-
ment. My Noble Relative ought to know, that ever since
MO the Government of this country has been formed on
a principal which prevented the Government frosts bring.
ing this subject nosier the consideration of Parliament.
The Grist thing I had to do was to obtain the cement of that
individual tell o is more interest.: by his inclination, snore
interested by his duty, and more interested by his obliga-
tions, than any other individual in this kingdom in having
the question settled ; it was necessary that I should obtain
the consent of that individual, before the Ministers of the
Government could consider the question as a Government.
Would it have been proper in me, my Lords, to have taken
any incase's-es to bring the subject under consideration, till I
had obtained that individual's consent to refer the subject
to Parliament? I call on my Noble relative to answer this
question. When he blames me on this subject, because
since last July or August, when I had formed my opinions,
I kept silence, talking to no man on the subject, except
with the consent of the individual I have alluded to, and
not till I had obtained his consent to form a Government
on the principle of taking this question into consideration,
my noble relation ought to place himself in my situation—
he ought to see what was expected of sue; and then, instead
of blaming me for acting as I have done, be would see
that if I had acted otherwise I should have been highly
blameable. When the question had been decided--when
I received the permission, so as to be enabled to snake a
declaration—on not having made which alone the acensa-
tion of surprise can be founded—the Session was MO near
that it was impossible to make known what had occurred
earlier, or in any other manner than by the Speech from
the Throne. I thank my Noble Friend for having given
sue this opportunity to state these circumstances to your
Lordships. The feet is as I have stated it ; and it was a
meson why I never before stated any of the circumstances
whatever. A Noble Friend of mine, now sitting near my
Noble Relation, reproached me on a former occasion with
the publication of a letter of mine. With the publication
of that letter I had nothing to do, and the writing it had
been better let alone. Indeed I shall take ease not to
write such a letter again to such an individual; but as to
the publication of that letter having deceived any hotly, or
that it is all difierrnt from what I have stated to the House
I totally deny.—(Hear, hear.)
Lord FARNHAM believed that he was the person al-
luded to by the Noble Duke. He had never eneent to
blame the Noble Duke for the publication of that letter ;
but he did say that it had a tendency to keep the country
in the dark as to his intentions. It certainly allowed no
man to suppose that it was the intention of the Noble Duke
to originate the measure this Session. He had stated, that
though he thought the question ought to be settled, he
could not then expect it, because public opinion did not
allow the measure to be discussed with sufficient modera-
tion. In was only in this view that he (Lord. F.) had al-
luded to the Noble Duke's letter.

The Archbishop of CANTERBURY had a petition to
present to their Lordships ; but before I present it (said
his Orem) I with to take this opportipith and it is re-