The Sun.
London, England, 1827-11-10 00:00:00

cacti; that existed,-as taken by the plaintiff himself,
and his attorney and counsel, and consequently his
Lordship dismissed the present motion, with cost,:.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
(Sittings inßanco.)

The Rev. Orator of the Areopagus, who was con-
victed of uttering blasphemous discourses' •at the
last Aittingsin.London, was in attendance again this
morning at the sitting• of the Court. He: took his
seat behind the counsel, and was occasionally en-
gaged in conversation with some fashionably dressed
females who sat in an Adjoining. box. •

EARL DUDLEY D. ROBINS.

This was an action brought by the noble. Secre-
tary of State for the Foreign Department, to recover
6,0004; which was placed in the hands of the, de-
fendant, who is an auctioneer, as a deposit for an
estate which Lord Dudley was about to purchase.
The title of the estate not being made good within
the stipulated period, Lord Dudley brought his
action to recover the deposit, and was nonsmted on
an Objection being taken to the amount of the,stamp
on which the contract for the purchase was written.

The ATTORNEY-GENERAL now moved , for a
rule to show cause why the nonsuit should
not be set aside, and a verdict entered
for the defendant, on the ground that. the evi-
dence upon which the Learned Judge directed a
nonsuit was false. The 'stamps which were affixed
.by the Stamp Commissioners should have been ac-
cording to the number ,of folios contained in the
contract, and a witness, swore on the trial that the
contract contained above sixty folios.. The contract
had since been counted by three different persons,
Who made affidavit that the instrument contained
less than sixty folios.—The_Court granted the rule.

BRAZIER V. soNrs.

This was an action against the Marshal of the
King's Bench Prison for the escape of a prisoner,
and a verdict was !found for the plaintiff with a
farthing, damages. Mr. Gurney obtained a rule on
behalf of the Marshal, on the first day of term, to
show cause why the verdict should not be set aside,
and a verdict entered for the defendant.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL now moved fur a rule
to show cause why the verdict should not be set
aside, and a verdict entered for the plaintiff, with
3411. damages, which was the amount of the plain-
tiff's debt against the ,prisoner who had escaped.—
Rule granted. . trot*i
- -

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS—Cfms DAY.)
The Court sat this day to hear motions for new
trials, but nothing "occurred of public interest. 'The
Lord Chief Justice has not yet; recovered suffi-
ciently to take his seat.

- '

COURT, OF EXCHEQUER.

It having been generally known that the Chan-
cellor of the Exchequer was to cOitie down to the
Court to-day, for the purpose of having the usual oaths,
administered to him,lia large concourse of persons were
in attendance froM a'n early hour to witness the
ceremony.. At half-past twelve, it was announced
to the Barons.that the Right Honourable, John
CharleS' Henries was then in an adjoining' room.
Their Lordships immediately waited on him, and
shortly after, the Right Honourable Gentleman
entered the Court, 'dressed in his robes of office.
The officer. of 'the Court then proceeded 'to admi-
nister the usual oaths to him, at the termination of
which the Chancellor of the Exchequer took his
seat on the Bench,.•:and asked -Mr. Jervis; the
Tubmwt of the Court, whether he had a motion
to make.

Mr. JERVIS then made a formal motion for a com-
mission, with,leave to answer within, six weeks.

The Right Honourable Gentleman then left tho
Court : he appeared, • we were glad to perceive, in
excellent health:,
BxquctlAlr.was in Court during the ceremony.