The Sun.
London, England, 1845-04-25 00:00:00

Mr. HINDLEY rose amidst loud cries of " Divide," and
" Oh, oh." He could assure the House he did not rise to
make a speeeh.—( Hear, hear.) He rose for the purpose of
asking whether a division would take place on the first proposi-
tion the Speaker would put fro .n the chair, and whether, if he
voted against the proposition, looking at it in its simple terms,
and supposing that he was determinedly hostile to the Maynooth
Bill, whether he was bound to give a negative to the proposi-
tion that the Speaker do leave the chair ?
The House then divided, when there appeared—
For the motion .
Against it ..... •. 321
Majority against the motion ...... --174
On our being re.admitted to the gallery, we found
Sir R. H. INGLIS op his legs addressing the House; in
answer to a question from whom,
Sir R. PEEL said that it was his wish that they should go
into Committee, and that the Chairman should report progress.
Of course they would go into Committee again to-morrow (this
day), after he had made his statement with respect to Scotch
banking. He was most anxious to give a general outline of
that measure, in fulfilment of a pledge given to the Scottish
Members who were interested in the question. If the discus-
sion on that statement were not prolonged the subject of the
Maynooth grant might be taken afterwards.
Sir R. 11. INGLIS thought Monday the better day.
Sir R. PEEL was of opinion that as they had already nine
days' debate upon the sul•ject, it would be better that they
should get through the subject as soon as possible. Under all
the circumstances he should feel it his duty to bring the matter
forward on the morrow.
Colonel SIBTHO RP—Although he had voted in the same
lobby with the Right Hon. Bar.uet, did not do so out of re-
spect to the Right Hon. Baronet or to his measures. He did
not like the principle of expediency on which the Right Hon.
Baronet seemed to found his measures.
Mr. HUME would wish to say a few words on the subject
of Scotch banking, when brought on to-night, but did not
object to the Maynooth question being proceeded with after-
wards.
Sir ROBERT PEEL said he would not bring forward the
Maynooth question after nine o'clock.—( Hear, hear.)
Mr. LAW thought they should not proceed with it until
Monday, and begged of the Government to postpone it to
that day. -
Sir lt. PEEL declined acceding to the proposal ; he had
been asked not to bring it on after nine o'clock, and he con-
sented, but he would not consent to a greater postpone-
ment.—( Cheers. )
Lord NORTHLAND protested against any factious oppo-
sition being given to the Government—he would not lend him-
self to it.
Mr. C. WOOD thought the measure might be brought on
to-night after the Scotch banking question, which would be
only, as on former occasions, a mere outline by a Member of the
Government.
Sir R. INGLIS had understood that the Government had
consented to postpone the further progress of the 8.11 to Mon-
day, after the House going into Committee pro forma to-
night.—( No, no.) A strong feeling prevailed out of doors on
the question, and tie hoped the Government would consent to
postponing it to that day.
Mr. PLUMPTRE denied that any factious opposition had
been raised. In consequence of the rapid movements which
had already been made, it would be more preferable to postpone
the sitting of the Committee on the Bill to next Monday. He
at the same time repudiated anything like factious opposition,
as far as he was concerned.
Lord J. RUSSELL did not think that there was anything
like factious opposition displayed ; the Bill had been carried on
as fairly as possible.—(Hear, hear.) As he did not expect
that a long discussion would arise on it ; he would desire
that they should go into Committee to-morrow.
Lord NORTHLAND having stated that he only meant that
he would be no party to factious opposition,
The House went into Committee, pro forma, and the
Speaker got leave to sit to-morrow in Committee.
THE INFEFTMENT (SCOTLAND) BILL.
This Bill was read a third time and passed.
The other orders of the day having been disposed of, the
House adjourned at One o'Clock.

SEVEN' TR REPORT FROM THE
CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE OF RAIL-
WAY BILLS.
The Select Committee appointed for the Classification of
Railway Bills, according to the resolutions adopted by the
House, and who are empowered to report from time to
time, have further considered the several matters referred
to them. and agreed to report as follows:
Your Committee recommend that the following Bills or
projects—

IV W.
Manchester and Leeds Railway,
Sheffield, Ashton-under-Lyne, and Manchester Railway,
Manchester, Bury, and Rossendale Railway, and the
Manchester, Leeds, and Hull Associated Railway Com-
panies,
be referred to one and the same Committee.
Your Comrnitteefurther recommend that the following Bill
or project be referred to a distinct Committee :
XX.
Taw Vale Railway and Dock.
Your Committee further recommend that the following Bill
or project be ;referred to the same Committee to which the
recommendation ur.der the letters VI/ applied :
VV.
2, St. Helen's Canal and Railway.