The Sun.
London, England, 1829-05-30 00:00:00

PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED,

Joseph Norton and George Norton, High-bridge-mills,
Yorkshire, fancy waistcoat-manufacturers.
Marmaduke Willis, Michael Willis, and Solomon Willis,
Egliam, Surrey. farmers.
-Edward Harrison, Francis Ullathorne, Jane Ullathorne,
Edward Monkhouse, 'Richard Lamb, and Jaae Gibson,
Bridge-end, Stratforth, Yorkshire, shoe-thread manufac-
turers.

William Ives and John Gethin, Britannia-wharf, Kid-
derminster, Worcestershire.

Matthew Smith and James Nicholls, silk-manufacturers.
Robert Reed awl Archibald Reed, Kingsland-road, gun
makers.

Thomas King and Thomas Blake, Ridge, Chihnark,
kshire, farmers.
Ambrose Harnett and Thomas Harnett, Minster, Isle of
Thanet, Kent, farmers.
Robert Amery and John Webster, Liverpool, eirt-
owners.

John Squire, jun. and Jams Buttrey, Huddersfield,
wool -staplers.
Thomas Ormerod, Thomas David, and John Surrage,
Bristol. woollen-drapers.
William St.phens and John Bedford, coach-platers.
Stephen Robinson, Samuel Brown Searle, and John
Archer, Saffron Walden, Essex, common-brewers.
Samuel Bickerton and John Williams, Oswestry, Salop,
druggists.
Francis Lewis, Philip Walters, and William Thomas
Morgan, Neath, Glamorgan, linen-drapers.
Thomas Mills and William Hope, Uppingham, Rut-
land, chemists.

Paul Jackson and Jobn Chambers, Newark-upon-Trent,
tallow-chandlers.

John Robert Anderson and Edmund Phillips, Lawrence
Pountney-lane, Irish provi*ion•-merchants.
William Peace and Samuel Peace, Sheffield, file-manu-
facturers.

IRISH LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, MAY 26.

THE KING, AT THE PROSECUTION OF THE EARL OF
KINGSTON, V. JOSEPH MILES MACDONNELL, ESQ.
Mr. SHELL said—l rise to shew cause, on behalf
of Mr. Joseph Miles Macdonnell, why the conditional
order for a criminal information at'the prosecution of
the Earl of Kingston, should not be made absolute.
The Noble prosecutor complains of a publication, by
Mr. Macdonnell, in the Evening Post, which he
considers as a libel upon him. I think it right to
apprise the Court that I resist the conditional order,
upon the ground that the Earl of Kingston is him-
self the aggressor.
The CHIEF JUSTICE, in delivering the judgment
of the Court, said • that the conditional order would
not be made absolute, if Mr. Macdonnell had con-
fined himself to the circumstance on which Lord
Kingston had appealed to the public ; but Mr. Mac-
donnell had not done so; he alluded to circum-
stances that had occurred many years ago, and in
doing so he could not be justified by any rule of that
Court. The conditional order should be made ab.
solute.

MAY 27.
SLANDER ON LADY A. BYNG.

This being the day fixed by the Court for the
defendant Remmy H. Sheehan, Esq. to come in and
show cause why the conditional order should not be
made absolute, for having published a paragraph in
the Star of Brunswick, reflecting on Captain and
Lady A. Byng,
Mr. Sheehan appeared personally in Court, and
addressed the Bench at considerable length, with a
view to show that the paragraph in question did not
bear the construction put upon it by the plaintiff.
Mr. G. BENNETT shortly stated, that it was not
necessary to occupy the time of the Court; the
simple fact was, that the parties applying for the in-
formation swore the libel was false, and therefore he
presumed the Court had no option.
Mr. SHELL was about to address the Court on the
some side, when Mr. Sheehan rose and said that he
consented that the rule should be made absolute,
which he presumed was all that was required.
The rule was accordingly made absolute.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.