The Sun.
London, England, 1818-08-12 00:00:00

DUBLIN, AUGUST 7.

• The following is the distribution of the IGth
Lancers :
One troop stationed at Cappoquin—One at Fethard—Two
at Clonmell, head quarters—one at. Carrick-on-Suir—One st
New Itoss—and one at Kilkenny.
2.d Royal North British Dragoons, distributed
as follows ;

, Two troops at Dundalk, which is head-quarters. Two at
Belturbet—One at Londonderry—and °tit: at Monaghan..
• 4411) Regiment of Foot -*Routes Were received
at Kilkenny, the head-quartos of this Regiment,
directing t bat the. following detachments should
,proceed to the undermentioned -stations, viz.
One Captain, 4 serjeants, 1 drummer, 48 rank and file
•to Thutles-1 subaltern, I serjeant., and 19 tank and file,
to Urlingford—t subaltern, I sedeant, and 19 rank and.
file to 13orrissoleigh=1 subaltern, 1 serjeant, and 19 rank
and file to Ballyraggilt—t subaltern, 1 serjeant, and 15
rank aid file to Doonane—i subaltern, 1 sedeant, and-
-15 vank and file to Tultarottel subaltern, 1 serjeant,
and t 2 rank and file to Dundrnm---1 subaltern, 1 ser-
jeant, and 12 rank and file to Cappawhite—i subaltern, i
serjeant, and 12 rank and file to Littleton-1 serjeant and 12
rank and file to Duturaore-1 Field Officer, 2 Captains, 2
subalterns, b sedeants, and 76 rank and file to Cashel—and
I.subaltei n, 1 serjeant, and 27 rank and file toTemplemore.
In the latter-mentioned stations, the detach-
ments are, to relieve-similar parties belonging to
the lat.,h !Foot, which are ordered to join the
bead-quarters of their regiment.
A route was received at Armagh, directing that
two companies belonging to the.32d regiment
should march from thence to Newry, where-they
are to continue doing duty till further orders. ,
Routes were received by the detachments be-
longing to the 16th Foot, stationed at Cashel and
Templemore, directing that they should march to
join their head-quarters at 'Athlone, when relieved
by_similar parties belonging to the 44th regiment.
The following is the distribution of •the 27th
regiment of Foot :
Four companies are stationed at Waterford, - which is the
head-quarters of the regiment—two companies stationed at
nexfot sl—one company at Carlow—one company at Duncan-
on Fort.

A route. was received at Newry, directing the
two companies belonging to the 82d regiment,
stationed there, to march from thence to Dundalk.
the head-quarters rof the regiment, when relieved
by the 82d. regiment, and at the same time 1
Captain, 2 Subalterns, 3 Serjeants, and 50 rank
and file, received orders to march from Dundalk
to r Drogheda, where they are to do duty until re-
lieved by other troops. . _

Upon the statement 01W AIARRYAT, confirmed
. -by •the evidence :or the plaint ill, it appcared, that
in 1803 the deternlant to,•k the premises in Ties••
tion, the garden.oi which was inclosed by u %,%11
in part, although on one side rhete was no wall.
That particular Covenant enjoined, that when-
soever the other laud beyond •he part tittincl,,sed
by a.wall should be let, the nefendaut slinttlit elm-,
stfuct a wall there. !hat la(id had been te: in
1805, but the defendant had not ettered the ti ail,
al,hotigh required by a notice. Fie bieach as to
rite other covenant was, that the prehnses, al-
though they had been-insured at times, had nut
been .insured continually.
111 r. GURNEY, for the defendant, stated, that a
more extraordinary or unjust attempt upon the
part of a landlord to eject a tenant, rifler haling
laid out an immense sum of money on the pre-
mises; had never been made,within his experience,
for his Learned Friend had thought it necessary
to keep back one circumstance, which dischAed
the injustice and oppression mat were attempted
to be exercised by the plaintiff in this case. The
land beyond the 'spot. whereon-the first wall ought
to be erected was let to the defendant in 1805-.-
no wall was Visit: by him then, not required to be
built ; and now when he bad laid out the whole
•in beautiful pleasure groOnds and ornamental
shrubberies, he was called-upon to build this wall
before his drawing-room windows, and completely
to debar himself of all the pleasure he expected' to
reap from the immense expeuce that lie had In-
curred. With repect to the insurance, the Learn-
ed Counsel would prove, that it Was regularly
continued, and the continuation money always
paid at the Insurance Office within fifteen days
after the expiration of each year=lhe period .
within which it ought to be paid by the terms
of the conditions contained in the policy.
The Learned Counsel proved these facts, and
that rent was received by the plaintiff after he had
given notice, both with respect to the non-exec.
timi of the wall, and the dleg, d non-insurance,
which circumstance he contended was a waver of
ail right ofejectment. -
Mr. MARRYAT contended, that the premises
were uninsured for,the fifteen days after the expi-
ration of one of the yeaTs,-and it did nut appear
on the face of the policy that the Insurance Com-
pany felt themselves liable it a loss had taken
place within those fifteen days.
Mr. GURNEY and \lr. Serieent TADDY contend.
ed on the wording of the condition, that as the
policy would be void if the renewal was not paid
within the fift,,en dap, so it must De valid atm la
full force as it was. '

Air. Justice Aligorr was not anxious to give
any opinion as to theliao►lityof tne-I,suratice
Office v.ithin the fifteen days. Such a point was
nt considerable importance, and would he Open to
Mr. Mart yat at a tuture period ; but at present,
under all the circumstances, he was of opinion
that the plaintiff must-he called.
•
A non-suit was, entered accordingly.