The Sun.
London, England, 1811-02-06 00:00:00

TUE3DAY, FOS. 5.

The ATTO111413? GIIN gum. made a communication
to the Court, on, the suriject of the impressed man,
to bring up whose boiya rule nisi for a habeas cor-
pus had been granted, upon the ground that he was
the Master of a vessel and that if it were lawful to
imptesS men: in Ins situation, Capfrins, or. even
.higher officers in the' mercaotile service, might be
invressed equally with common seamen. Tite At.
turney General Statcd, that, in point of tad, the
man had beeti, withdrawn from the Standard betore
111 A ship sailed on foreign service, and was removed
to the Salvador del Mundo,• where he now was,
h wing never been sent on any • service whatever,
The Attorney General was anxious that this circum-
stance shoule be- made.. known, as it would serve to
-cerred the animadversions which had very properly
fallen train the Court, under its erroneous impression,
that the man had been sent abroad pending the Hp-
pLotiou to their Lordships for a habeas corpus to
Wing up his body. • • .
Lord ELIANUOROUGH 'expressed his satisia&ion
with the Attorney General's communication to sire
Court. He was very glad that the fiundation of the
faa, which had excited their displeasure was now
withdrawn.

THE► KING V. WEINFIOLT AND OTHERS.

The Al"rOlttaY Gi”teitAt. moved for leave to file
a criminal information against Mesirc Weinholt,
Outram, and-Welch, three merchants of Liverpool.
It appeared fiorn the iflidavits apoil which thiS,Lno-
lion was triade that Mr., Weiiiholt being indebted
to a Gentleman of the name of tiyling tool., had
thOught proper to meet the debtor's claims by a
challenge. Mr. Outram attended Mr. hyling with
tine letter, and when the latter expostmateil with
hini'Upon his friend's conduct, refused to
,hear any
explanation. Mr. Welat's native; was added to she'
motion, becatise he accoMpanied Mr. Weinholt to
the public:coffee-house at Liven pool, where. Mr.
ling W3l thus posted for refusing the challenge " to.
the aft'of'a scoundrel that of a coward being added:
by Mr. Ityling, he is hereby posted accordingly."
This paper wasoworn to be of the hated-wiltaig,of
Mr. Welch. The Attorky General did nut go at:
large into the transattior;w; but said it would turn
OM to be one of the most outrageous cases the Court,
had witnessed.- • • -

The Court had at•first s,,tne doubts about grant,
ing the lute against Mr. Welch ; but Lord' ELLEN..
BOUOUGII observed, drat the circumstance of Iris tics.
cot»panyingMr, NVeinholt into the coffee-room,
sheared that he, could not be the mere copyist of the
libeirbut.meant to be Considered as a party to it:
Rule Nisi granted. • .

BAItRISON V. KING.

The ATTORNKY tilleWC(l cause against
the rule which had been ohtainvd by Mr.
'DATING, why a writ of fi. fa. for 46.71. should
not be discharged, or so much of the sum levied as
w aot'due to the plaintiff returned, This applica-
tion to the Court was made upon the affidavit of
the defendant, whicb stated, that the plaintiff hay-
tog obtained a judgment of 1,0871. agalltSt film, in,

Piinted b CHARD H A itlt 5,0f,!\19. 4, martiett_court, Dow.gigect and px:b by:WILL:I4M PPS, south Malton
1.4 Isip ON
at the Surt-OFFICV, NO. 112, Strand, where Advertisements, ()ram for the Paper, iiftt‘rs. for tbo 'Editor 2kc, tpost-p4ia),