The Sun.
London, England, 1842-01-29 00:00:00

-L \AT IN TELLIGENC E.

141ANCERY COURT—(THiS DAY.)
t The LORD CH-ANtELLOR, on taking his seat to-day,
ated that it ITIVa his intention to give judgment on Mon-
(laY in the causes of
q- " Gladstone v. Blundell," and theAttorn
General v. the Earl of Stamford."
HERRING v. CLOBERRY.
The arguments in this part-heard oaie were resumed
this morning, and occupied his Lordship the whole day.

.OLLS'--IMI-',T7(liiiS DAY.)

DAY v. CROFT.
Mr. TIN Er said thiS was the petition of the plaintiff
• 3ing that it might be referred to the Master to as-
r• Irlain whether it would be for the benefit of the testa-
the purchaser of certain property mortgaged to him by
the testttetitiator - and if any, what proceedings should be
110 ti;leinestealue'ity fel.: that purpose. The petition stated
...sonsprised certain copyhold property which
t,oo,„een mortgaged to Mr. M'Dougal, for the suns of
v'. It then stated the death of the testator, the-
-6rz,,, ger of the property, after which event the execas-
rontinued to pay the interest on the mortgage, till
Vthin the last year and a half, when the interest had
Zell in arrear to the amount of 4501. The petition then
411'14 en to state, that the said copyhold premises were
• ' avery dilapidated condition, and required immediate
till'D'Ar• The Solicitor had made repeated application to
I executors of the mortgagor for Payment of the in-
, mertst, and also to put the premises in repair, but they had
bad been
that the whole of the estate of the testator
In ' been exhausted in the due course of administration.
13th of
of this the property was surveyed on the
It lofjanuary, and from the letter from the surve,yets
aPP(arecl that they could not hold out any well
"auded expectation that any sum above that or 6,5001.
could be obtained for the property. This did not include
the
'ltiu'es• The property had cost the testator, Mr.
Znes, 14,0001., and owing to the depreciation of the
debts of the property it was bow insufficient to pay his
be i'• Under these cirmaistances he thought it would
to
1`) the benefit of the plaintiffs to have this property
:41.11ine.:103rn•r,Thetdogr;tehe execut,ors of the mortgagee for the
the 6,500/.. which sum was to go in liquidation of
of the debt and interest in arrear, the executer
agee to pay for the fixtures in the general
ter,:rt die petition now prayed that this should be re-
So;', to the Master to know whether this course would j
Oe for the benefit of all parties.
1,1.11:3 LORDSHIP ordered it to be referred to the Master.
01,1(,11.: 0F CAMBRIDGE V. THE DUKE OF BRUNSWICK.
Said i,`"IS Case being called on this day Mr. HEATHFIELD
clien'te Wished the case to stand over till Monday, as his
had nsf,', ,The late Solicitors to the Duke of Druuswkk,
thenlT 04 time to answer a certain affidavit respecting
the , this cause, and which affidavit was only filed
Ar(4% before yesterday.
Plenty rEM
Of tiBERTON said that the solicitors named had had
me to make the required answer. , •
teadis
e, Mr o glenme to
do, you say the affidavit was
m Death
t!..lll4trurzeLD-Thelday before yesterday, my Lord.
LonDsHlP—Then I will take upon myself to say,
ca: there has been plenty of, time to get copies. In all
my experience—and I have had a good many
fours , re neglect has been charged upon the office, I have
that charge of neglect was unfounded.
ki',l • PeatnEteroN said this affidavit was relative to cer-
h•e, Papers which were held by the clients of Mr. Heath-
-41: and which they refused to deliver up, in conse-
bill.ne°
Th the Duke of Brunswick having disputed their
th,ir ese pa were necessary to be produced in
be Rolle eattSe' andpers AMA be produced before the case could
I\lr. Into, •
to .
'.4tte -EVIIIFIELD said he could not take upon himself
4 be any arrangement with respect to these papers,
• . had received no instructions relative to them.
bs is L°nDsuip—lt is not usual for a solicitor to- keep
i—tipers necessary to a cause because a party chooses to
‘ploy
~ another solicitor, is it?
• Ir. HEATHFIELD said it was not shown that these
papers
were necessary to the cause. His clients had not
Zen the affidavit referred to, and therefore they could
'make any answer to it. If his Lordship would let
is case stand over till Monday, the answer would be
Produced, and Mr. Pemberton could then go on with the
cite if he thought fit.
, xIS LORDSHIP—Mr. Pemberton can go on with the pe-
qtkin now if he thinks proper.
The case was then ordered to stand over till Monday.