Star.
London, England, 1830-12-08 00:00:00

LAW REPOIITS.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Dse. 7•

SOLID/ V. Tat COZPOZATION OP' LIVZSTOOL.
This ease are before the Court tads), open demurrer to the plain-
dire bill, whisk sought the of all Aortae, deeds,
asemssis belesslng to the of U GB oftwaandss7other
aid of la alma to an action at law brought apiat him by the tar.
peeMbn.
The ildielesrAissesel and lit E. B. arks appeared as counsel for
saw ft of the dimmer.
Tho SoLicyros-essznas was may be could DO argue this cue
so mai b detail as he was desirous of &Mg for his client, in apse.
queen 1 the sudden manganese that bad ben made with respect to
the karma of appeals in the Hams of Leeds. The Cam, doshelems,
was aware ate he (the SolicitorAeseral) aid his learned triad, had so
=eltheir Imams, as, without prejudice to their ammo. they Nut
s Hamar and the House if Lords but if mob
wee* to be made es those he now alluded to, without gialvb7=el
proper nodes, It was quite Impossible Causal could do their duty to
desk clients or the Court. . . .

71'he ViCi-Csaiciaort Owned, that it was hie wish to give
every fadlity he could to the Counsel practising In two Courts. It
was, according to Lord Eklen's &deaden, the practice of the King's
Counsel attending the Court of Oseneery, to attend the bar of the
House of Lords, and he bad so arranged the rondos of business la
this Court as to giving Counsel the opportunity limmdift the
House of Lords ; but if sods sadden alterations were med. *Mout
any notice, either to himself or Counsel, of course he could net in-
terfere with any t that might have hem made with refer-
sue to the House of His Haw did not drink k necessary
to hear Counsel is the other side In this ease. He was closely of
opinion that he must overrule the demurrer, giving leave to the da
Pendant to put in a limited demurrer and answer. they andeetabing
not to Er with the action in the meantime.
The having no business to proceed with, rise at 11 o'clock.
COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Dsc. 7.
(Before Lord TENTEIDIN, sad a Special Jury.)
01.11.VMIXX.SZLIT T. MAIDOSI.

This action we brought by the steer Weber of Oray's.hus against
the parish authorities of 136 Anew, Holborn, for an alleged trespass,
in having taken some of the Admire property in distress for poor.
rates. The only quad= for the Jury was, whether Gray's-Inn dis-
trict was extemparembial
The plaindirs ease was imppleed by Mr. Campbell and junior
Counsel. The retained Sit J. Seadett and others.
A most and beautifoleelhi ef Gray's Inn, with its build.
hip sod enclosures, which we eitieeleed is the paned= of Mr.
Cala, was brought into Court, Y mkt that the Jury might have a
comet view at the locality of that cdsbassill NA mocha Inn.
Iteatd from the statement of Mr. Cowbell, do Gray's Ins
the property of the family of Grey de Wilton. In the
reigwas ly n
Edward the Thirds writ of ad quad daemon issued, and
Reginald de Grey was allowed by the Ciown to found a Chapel at
Poet Pool, now Gray's lon. The demise was web to the Monks of
Sheens. and became the chapel of the Lord of the Masse In default
of an heir the manor was entreated to the Crown, ad fag into the
hands of the Prier of St. Bartholomew ultimately been the of
the Dean and Chapter of St. Paul. It was always (hutch
property, privileged and exempt from the duties of a ”dsh, and
consequently extrirperochial with respect to rates. The question
having been agitated in 1774, it was proved to be bial,
and from that time to the present no rates bad been paid Grad's'
Inn. The parish however, pretended of late to have made a s-
covery which placed the Inn within the parish of It. Andrew Hol.
born, and, consequently, made it liable to pay rotes. The Learned
Counsel and, Conn
should prove, by documentary and parole evidence,
that Gray's Inn was extra.parethial, and the jury would no doubt
find a verdict for the plaintiff; thereby deciding against the claim of
the parish to rate persona who had not been considered liable to
rates dude( the last half century.
Evidence having been given in supped of the. plaintiff's ens,
Sir JANES SCAILITT contended, that Gray a Inn bad never been
held to be out of the parish of St. Attars", sad unless his learned friend
could prove that it had been token out of the parish by Act of Pella.
meet, It was liable to pay rates. Nothing but an Aet of Parliament
could remove from the inmates of Gray's Inn, their share of the bur-
den, which they ought to bear as well as other:. The learned gentle-
man cited deedsof conveyance executed by Edmond Lord Grey de WIL
too, by which the Inn was demised to Hugh Dennis, and in those
deeds the propertyawas described to be in the parish of Saint Andrew,
Ho.

Domunents frau the Clumery Roll were rad in support of the case
for the wish.
At • late hour the Jury found a verdict for the defendant, damages Is.
costs dOs.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, WZIITMINITIIII, Dim. 7.
Sittings after Term, before the Lona Misr itnistez and a Special
Jury.
ORZEIFIC 11. POLL
_ _

Thin ins in Miss bnlgitt by time pinieellk Oreeneon mover cont.
pssenlien Ms In Ss The buisons• Mee, for damage occasioned
te war hem' by AM olio, by a whisk Wok yinse in June,
ISM tbe lumen litkadarhay amp in Neetawareet, Graevetior.
elm& The "mien was, whether by say leiensiesel ewer in the
entimeednews why, the placid(' of his isms (wisiek be computed at
aunt 1,111$1.) rte fOlist net havelhellsited his sight to any cornpensa.
tien.--The Jury boa kr the pininig ire,
lis.
The ease serspisis suieitisenble tree so Monday and yesterday,
but we lave moms fbr tle doll% width wens of no very rent
Winn.