The Sun.
London, England, 1818-06-10 00:00:00

AT,TEN,

After widling smtiC 11111 V,
Lot(' Visc,,unt t-tomou-ril moved the fitst yea

ittg of the Aliens Naturalization Prevention lu 11.
Lout ntoved the'readin,g the 2li ii
Standing,Orrler, which. 'vas read aecoroiogly; stat-
ing, that it Was tiOt Usual to oppose the first read,
ing-of 'a Bill.
The Bill was read a first time.'
'Lord VISCOMI tSihat; iOTU then stated, that the
object of the Bill Was to preveii until the 25th of
March, Aliens from becoming nainralized by the
purchase of Stock in the-Bank of Scotland, under
a law 'Of Seoland, or under the operation of any
law passed by'the Parliament of Ireland, with rt-
. feTence to cettaiit Co, porations in that part of the
United Kingdom ; and it being expedient to pass
the Bill'wilhoot delay, he had give,' notice of
movittg, to suspend certain of the Standing Or-
dtrs. fie now looted the 'reading of the Stand-
ing Order, N0:26,- Which was lead, and ordered
to lie suspended ; and ako the fending of the
Standing Order 125, iip.;it the qu.stiott' for sus-
' pending Which
Lord HOLLAND rose to protest against the
whole'proceeding with
the
to this Bill.
:I.,;,rdshitt adverted to the Clause first proposed upon
this subject in the Committee upon the.Alieti
Bill, and to the steps Which had- subset-Or-oily
been adopted; for the purpose of shelving that
.the variance in the different propositions brought
forward by Alinisters theniselveS' seemed decided-
•ly to prove tlkat they.wt.re cAliug upon the House
to legislate upon a question respecting which they
themselves were utterly fgoorant., It had heel'
obser vett:by-a late eminent Statesman, for -Whom
‘.he (Lewd. Ilolland) had' the greatest .veneration
and atUctiou, that when, upon instilled! Inestions,
:they found theinselVei iii the' Malik,' the best way
was 'to :st.'and.silll; NOW, however, it seemed
• that the course recommended 7 by the Ministers
was that thnogh 'Confessedly in the clack, they
abOuld run as fast as' triey conic!, without caring
- what they 'stumbled over, or whether they broke
the-beadS•Of whet 's' or of thems-elKet,
..Thns,,tvith
:regarcrto the
.present gill, they were going to
suspend the.rights of a number of persons', with-
out kit Owing :thorn' Or .what deseriptit.of
pci-
sons that en•fiensiOn might` affect. It wai
that no retrospective operation was now given up
the measure, and so far much. of his .fOrnitir ',ob-
jection Was done away, but still, with regard to
.retrospectiiin, this Bill seemed to cast a longing,
lingering look r behind,- as-it Would, in point
fact"; be retros.pective, by atft_cting_persons ho
might before its-ftaiiiing have ordered the purchase
of Stock. iii the Bank of %ScOtlanil;. flis great ob-
jection, however, to. -this'measure in its present
shape. was, that it .did- not appear 'what laws
'would be suspended by it, nor what rights of in-
dividuals would he affected. It was es•eit matter'
of doubt whether-the, prerogative of the Crown
in granting Letters of Denization world not be
atfeeted by this' Mea-sure; or the rights acquired
by-time dc-scelidant's 6Cthe Princess Sophia of Ha-
nover. ENceptions were,' it was said, here made
in the Bill, in--favour of- foreign' seamen or sol-
diers, employed, to the Nayy or Army, or Pro.
testant foreigners settling in our colonies, but.
how were they to know that these eXceptiobseni-.
braced all the cases that Ought to be excepted,
and how -could, they /tut their trust upon so int,-
portant question in those Ministers :who b*ad so
entineody displayed their ignorance of all the
laws relating to the question upon which they.
proposed to legislate. He could not, therefore,
under all the .cretonstances of • this measure,
whilst he •admitted that much of his objection,
by there Lein j no; or at leait rer.y little retro::
•
spective operation given to it, out protest against
the precipitancy with which this Bill was attept-
ed to be carried through the House.
The Standing Order last read ryas ordered to
be suspended. •
(,)ti the motion of :Lord Viscount SIDMOUTH,
the Bill was read a second time, the conmiitment
negatived, and the Bill read a third time.

Oa the -qctecion fo'r putting.ilaC,-queStion , that
the Bill do M,VepaSi,
The Earl Gaily rose for the purpose of asking of
Noble 'Lords Opposite
_to explainl he bearings and
.•
impatt , of., their own measure.- ►l'hey had just
witnessed the precipitancy with whielithisMea;
sure bad beeti hurried • 'tliriatigh• the lions'e,. after
suspending" the Standing Orders; and that for this
precipitancy nOTeason• had, been rissigned. That
it igh t-b-e-couretrient• SO.IO da
that is to say, that it might he very inconvenient
to many .ortsong to-Aela'y-the
tion 0.1 Parliament ;. but , whatever necessity 'vas
plead6d, 'it 'had "arisen'_ entlr'elY fiom the.acts. of
Ministers themselves, and ministerial convenience
was, he contended, no ground whatever for
departing froth -the•lurida ' of that House 'forms
which :were of 'the utmost importancC,withsefe'r.,
ence to the &epee
..disthisSiOu and due-considera-
tion of Ole measure brought _berate it. 'There
weie undoubtedly precedentsstis,penNtig, the. ;
Standiug-Valettilucertain OSes of necessity; but
he did not believe there was any precedent for
that, peecipitate cours'ellrwpropOsed tO be adopt-
ed, avid-out any nece?e4ty. proved' to. exist for it,
siiiJ he thought if that course was gviw adopted-, it.
would, be 'establistting. • a ,dan4erouS precedent,-
whiHt betelaiiirctiVe WA-eater-Of the. g;
est public inconvenience. By the course now „

adopted, no time trbalever Was given for the con-
sideration of .the ; and it was surely not too
enrich tO ask Noble Lords on the tither side to
explain what Was their view of its bearing Bn.l
import ? As it stoOil, it w,tts founded altogether
in ignorance of the kw; and how ‘vere they to
be sore that the exceptions.stated in the Bill were
all the e:ieevtipos .that ought to he Insle, and
that they would
,not,
,by passing it in its present
state, seriously atteet the rightsl)l
legally acquired .under the existing laws of the
land. The Ministers had first proprised one mea-
sure, then another., and then, a third, and so on ;
evidently slien'ing that they were ignorant of Ike
law upon the sohject : 'first' the measure only ap-
plied to the Bald: of Scotland ; dOW it wag to
operate with regard to Corporations in Ireland;
and how were they to be certain that it would not
apply to other cases, nut known or;tmticipirett at
the present moment ? Why then did not. Minis-
ters lytiog forward the Alien, Bill at '*n earlier pet
riod ? or why should they not give further time
for the consideration .of the prestut measure ? for
surely the jocoovettieoce to, 4 few ind.viduals, e,
sidrint: (tow delaying the Dissolution, ought not
to be put in the Inklaocc agAin-t the serious evil of
depriviog persons of tights, wh:cb they had ac-..
gaited under the law,ot the land. his Lotlship
concluded by obsersing, that.thOitgh by rtitno%i,,g
the retrospective Operation of the' measure nuldt
objection to it was dune away, he most sill en-
ter his protest against the precipitancy with
wl ich the Bill was horriA through the Ilotise,
without any necessity for that precipitancy being
stated, and withont the requisite inquiry b, log
made as to the effect aid Oiler ttion.oUthe measure.
The Earl of Li/EitrooL obser%edi, With refer-
ence to the suspension of the :Standing Orders,
that whilst they had an advantage over the other.
House in that re-pect, that they Could not be taken.
by surprize, the very order which stated that a
day's notice, should be given of any motion to
suspend tllPnt tick now ledged iii priociple that
there might be cases in which, it might be.neces-:
saty or expedient to suspend
,them, in older to'
pass a Bill'thiough several stages in one day. As
to the atgument that no necessity was urged in.
the present case, he maintained *that the Standing
Orders had been repeatedly' uspended in cases of
much less necessity ; for how did 'the question
stand with regard 'to the present Bill, theneces-
sity had no reference Co the inconvenience of the
delay of a Prorogation or Dissolution :(though lie
admitted than might be very,inconseuient); but
if there were,. no ;Prorogation or, ,Dissolution in
contemplation, he contended that it would have
been a nrattir of urgent necessity. to suspend the
Standing Orders,.
,for the .D.1P95c...0f 'Passing
this Bill through all its stages,ltrone.day. For
what must be the causeqtteneepr 6,14.1 The Bill
had no retrospective ciperBtiOn,:intrAe certain
result of its beitigderayed theOrditi'tl-oirtime would
he, that by the fiMe.ii.Wai passediliere would be
no Alien in the emntry, all those who were
Aliens would have ''got rid •of •the character of
Aliens, either by purchasing Stock in the Bank of
Scotland, or•by Some other meansi' and. he ,put it
to their Lordships, whether. to allow of such a
result taking-place:might not be productive of the
most dangerous consequences ?,--A.a.-todepriving
persons of rights, the argument, did opt apply ;
the Bill deprived no individuals of any rights they
had acquired ; it oterely,staspeuded the capacity in
Aliens of acquiring by,cvrta.jnprocesse!, thi.!Eights
of naturalized sobjects. And in every view of the
question this measure was essentially necessary,
for it was 'surely Of:the greatest, importance
to the safety of the Country to prevent Aliens
from acquiring thi:tights in natural born. sub-
jects, without' 'any pledge of their loyalty or
fidelity ; it was 'absolutely essential to any ef-
fect from an -Alien Ac,,- and if' there %vete no
Alien Act, it was still more essential that Aliens
should be prevented from"arquiring the rights of
thitural born sobjects•Avithoot these guards and
checks, which would operate as a security for
their loyalty ttl tllV,GoVertintetit. —This ,Bill was
timely iutetttledto,prevent the operation of these
laws for naturalizing until Parliamer

could have an opportunity of properly investigat-
ing the subject, with a view to theit.repeal, which
repeal he thought, for the reasons he had already
stared, must be considered obviously expedient,
Earl. SPENCER condemned the precipitate ',Dan-
ner io which this measure was hurried thrOogh
the Rouse, and objected to the *whole proceediug,
as being directly contrary to those principles which
'noght -to regulate their legislative' condnet.' lle
therefore entered his decided protest-against the
course of proceeding -which the Ministers; in. utter
ignorance of the effect of their own measure, or
of the laws to Which- it :referred, -were inducing
the House to itdop.i.,
Lord HOLLAND .wished to know whether. the
though it. !night not., affect, existing tights,
'ight not operate, with regard to persons whose
natura4fction depended upytt...4 .certain term of
service, that term expiring, inthe interval, be-
tween the passing of:ibis Bill and the 25th of
March next ?
. . , .
The Bill was passed,* and a Message ordered
to be sent to the House of Commons, staring the
concurrence of the House in the Bill.--Adjourned
till to-motrow (this day).

HOUSE OF COMMONS.
At four o'clock the SPEAKLI counted- the nollse,
Ayllen only 26 Alembers being nre-sentp an e•ljotirn-
tnent until to-morrnut kt,e ge $4 arily took ,place.:•

Last night, between 8 and 9 o'clocky.a respec-
tably dressed young wornap...attempted to throw
herself over Blackfriars-bridge.A gentleman
riished forward,—atnrCiaTting lier clothes, grasp-
ed tberu'ito firmly as to .retain her on the outside
o€, balustrade, partly -suspender! and partly.
resting. on .the.elttetior cornice, lir this. situation
'she continued Jur, sonic, .issoments, feebly strug-
gling, ant! faintly,eselairning, "-.1.-et me. go,''' till
a man courageouslY climbed Arr,Or •t he Atitltistrade
to ber, ,and-assisted those within:to lilt her back..
She a'as At first insensible and :speechless, .but af-
terwards so far recovered as .to be.conductedo- by
support,,, from the:Spot.. Two womeniwito saw
her take. the, desperate plunge •Were . so:affected as.'
to fall into by,sterick .—Otte.of ..tliesui. who had, a
cliiljk with locc,..was.i;person of sa.respt;ciable.nia-
tronly aPpearance ; the other was a decent look-.
ing poor WOlthin.

r, A w INTELLIGENCE.

MLITT OF KING'S I3ENCEI, :Tit:st 9.

TILE KING,' 6N THE'PIiinUCUTIO:4 OF THE MARQUIS

. OF EXETER, V 133A.KARD.
Mr. GtrultcßY said,. that he was instructed to
show cause against a rule for a 'criminal intorma-
tiors against the propricror'ot The Stuntford.
for.a s'iristiosed. 'Uhl 'you -the MittqlliS of Exeter.
• Lord ELLENanitouGti asked if Mr. Gurney, were
pr•o% hied .whir any atlP.avits ill which it was sworn
that the imputations Contained hi the alleged libel

were true
Mr. GuavF v answered, that he wat; i se'vera
persons, -vt hose names it was not necessary to
state, depo%ed to the iti'egitlar arid indecorous
conduct of tht: Marquis of I.,:xeter, 'Who, in-cotts:.•
pail -with a Capt. Percy, had frequently (seven
instanas bring, partitulari7ed) ridden through
the town of Statufold, nodding, &c. to females
whom he saw : on one occasion he stopped before
.a window where some most respectable ladies
were sitting, and who in.cooscrpience wtie obliged
to retire. At another time his Lordship had been
seen stnilitqt and nodding at Mary Holland, ti
1111Vr and dress-maker iu the-tonn„and -peeping
into the .shop NAliore she was at %,-ork. The. Noble
Marquis. hail carried these improprieties to such
leugth, that his conduct hat become the subject
of general conversatiow and complaint.- lie had
also, several corfirmatory atTiddvits on behalf
the .defend dly, the ptoptietor of the Stanford

. Mr. CLARKE?, on the other side, interrupted
Mr. Gurney, and 01)SCI ve,l, that -it was tomeces-
pay tocuter further into the facts star.el in the
atlidavi•s, if the Court thought that a repetition of
the assertions in the libel on affidavit at-folded a:
sufficient answer to the application for a criminal
info' mation. The Marquis of Exeter had not had
an opportunity, and probably could not contra-
dict what was sworn, that he had ridden th:-ough.
the streets of the town, of which he was almost
the sole proprit tor, and he might have looked into
a mi!linet's shop; but the Learned Counsel sub-
mitted, that this•could not warrant he gross at-'
rack male ur on him by th.e:defezdant in the'
Newspaper of which be was.the proprietor-. • The:
Marquis'of .Exeter. was a eery young .Nobleman,
and might, perhaps, hare. been guilty of some of
those indiscretions froth which his rank did not.,
exempt hint; but it was nut fir, for the sake -of
public decency, that they should thus be made the
•
subject .of pubLic discitssion.
Loud, ELLE:ZBOttoUG-11::—.-It should seem. that
tbis.staring; at'the•windows and these nodilingS
have ;been many times repeated, and they lead to
the. •conclusion, that there.is Something: improper
in:the conduct of•the Marquis of Exeter, which
has been made matter of aniinadvelsion.and com- •
plaint. I apprehend, jtesording to,the rule the
Count haS laid- down--for itself; it Will not inter-
pose by criminal Iacono:16011;1f the facts are Con-
firmed upon affidavits ;lint • it leaves the party to
his 'reined y before ‘a Grand: Jury.
CLARKE repeated, that tin' rMargitis of Exeter was a
Very young tiohletuant only about Ift;yl6.of age.
Lard EttlENnottonnis.—Wedo nut ,ay whether the publi.
cationis.a fijaet ur: mulythat.the• Court, Older the eirL
eunisiances, nut take notice of it. , •
Mr. CLARKE suLuaitteit, that the affidavits did not suffi-
ciently answer the Complaint. • The Nilargiiis of Exeter bait a
right.to rote throol!'h his•own bbrough,.and if he s:i‘v frinds
at a v,•iiidove, there could be no great harm in nodding, to
then:.

- I,,f;rti ELLENBOROUGH again said, that as affidavits Were.
produced tti-skow that What was advanced itt the lefter.pith-
lished '.(7,,e,,StarnArd.News, wastrue, the Court Would nut
interpose, •
Mr. ('.L..sRI E complained that.the attack had been•repeated;
and that to .preveut the further outrage of his Lordsh:p's
'feelings, it hatihectuor,necessary to take some step of otticr.
ME. dusticeßAYi.yv observed, that if the Noble Marquis
thought it kudent 'he could bring his ease before a Grand
.Jury, and hat very.shortly, as the Assizes were so near.
Mr. tiurtsEit denied that particular pains had been taken
to distribute the letter in question, as wai stated ia.the affi-
davits on the other side.: only two 'cepies had been given
away, besides the ordinary circulation or the newspaper.
' Mr. Jpstice, liau.s,tr.said.that the regular purchasers of the
newspaper might be very numerous,
GuItNEY contended that the defendant had not repeat:.
ed his libeli• hadtad only .maintained the tads he bad once'
asscutedood which Ite,was. ready to prove., • .
Mr. CL.Ik,KE. refer 4 totilejrideCetit &tiers-Mitt:ls made by
.t' i, Editor of the StreniArif News upon the mutinn fora eri..
initial information ; as to the part of theni that related to hint..
stilf,.a.nd supposed, mis-statements. he had .wade, he' was per-
reedy indifferent.7-Ittile discliuoged.

GLOVE 4 DRURY-LAVE TEIBATRE.
We mentioned . a few. days since Mr.-Tactldy's
application for a rule to show cause Asiky the in-
quisition in this,case, had before the Sheriff of
Aliddlesex, should not be set aside on, the:ground
of a misdirection in point' of law.—The question
this day carte fur argument. •
Mr. F. PowrcK-showedcaose against the rule,
contending -that the Under Sheriff.had:bot
directed, the.,Jury, but tkat strict, justice had been'
attained by the verdict the. plaintiff claimed his.
wile's, salary of ten guineas per. week for ten
weeks, when.she had earned it by her, own exer-
tions, and :by, means of it had maintained her-
selt and children. in respectability. It hod been
contended, at the trial, that the plaintitr had given
notice to the.Committee,of AlanaLfers not to pay
his wife's salary but to himself; but the Jury had
disbelieved. the ,evidenee, •which, in fact, only
went' to show that the,ootice had 'been thrown
into some, of tine .offices of the theatre, or, given
to one of. the pallets. Mr.' Moore had told.
the plaintiff's, at turner; that 'Airs. c;luver only
%vas; the servant of the proprietors, and that they..
CM, Id only pay her ; atid yut Mrs. Glo‘er had '
been allowed by her husband to continue to. per-
forth. The i'roprietors would not have
.accepted
her services on any other terms-; and that the plain-
tiff well knew ; and by ailoWing Iu play long
afterwards, be bad tacitlY.admitted the tule of the
theatre.'
Lord ELL,ENTOROU6II.—UnIuckiIy there is in
the English' law no. such [biog. as -a femme sole by
the custom of a theatre. • . • • •
Mr. Justice ABBOTT-11.11‘0,..if any law could be
shown. by. which the husband was preve,nted from
ectiviogihe .earnings of his Ay,ife .? • ,
.. Mr.
,Pok.t.ocK.urged. that this, ease wps.a
color exception, inasmuch . as „theiikaiotiff knew.
the terms on Avnirb his wile. W as employed : the
proprietors invikriably 'Laid only to the performer,
aind,'“vhat practice the t iff had agreed by al-,
lOWilig Mrs. Glover. >itill tv pejipi
The ;Cowl t observed, that,shat argurnott. would
be in bar of all damages,, whereas, here the right
01:the plaintitfto.recover sorltetliing shad been ad.
mitted, by. the verdict offe_fgrOjng,
The husband could not restrain ;he wife from ,

idayng except by ,bodily force, and WLat
tication would the husband have bad, It •
r!yrfr forts previented Iris ivife'4 perform
meatis'ot which she gained a lirelthoot. fo;
St U and. Children.? It' was quite clear that
plaintiff had a legal title to the earning 'of '3l
wife, end nothing 'could bar him of tha
tine; the notice-he bail-given, and which 001
fendauts did not deliy that they had received.
Mr. Justice flot.tiofriit relerred to ti O'se iltj!
Salk., in Which it was held that, e'en e39"adi
the death of the husband, the earnings of ..•ii,
wife did not belong to her, but went to the
band's.execw ors.
`vent
Mr. I.)ol.Locx, with great earnestness,
into some of the facts; to show the reasonsoto
ness of the receipt of the salary by the %vireo
earned it, and who spent it in the support of he';
self and family, the hiiiban it,' COntr
d in no W
Inning to their maintenance.
„i•
The Court, howevet, was cleat( of o
that the law Was against him, and the role f"r•
fresh inquisition was accordingly made absolute
'CRIMINAL 'CRIMINAL INFORMATION.
f,
Just at. the I of the Culicr; Mx. qCAn--t
thil"
alitre,.(oted their Ludships, and requested ►
.they would permit him to make a motion,
!nnless Made to-day, a young Nobleman wi. ei,
a!-
still continue subject to those persecutions vO4,
he had suffered bar some time past. ifisaPl'll,(4;
tion was fOr crininial information ag"''Ls.p
public print, awl he made it on the pail
Chatles 'Spencer Churchill, whose character 110
been. attacked in the grossest mantis: f', and %%
had been to:.mented both With public and pr'*.6ll
libels for some time past. His-present applicoo
Ntl3 founded' on affidavits verifying ever)? °/,,
which he should state to their Lordsliips• jr.P:tl
peared, that on the 20f ft of last- month, r,
Chalks Spencer Churchill was driving io
.bury along the Kiug's !toad, at a modcrate-rltt,
just before him was a chaise, in which
Tooke and two Lathes. • Mr. Tooke pipao;nti
be a very indiff, rent driver.. There wasif"l%-ttio
r
for three cartil!...,es in that ,part of the,
which (hot .were but the miskilful Jit
which Mr. 'Tooke Managed 11:s horse, ree- et
-0
i4npossib!-e for Lord Charles to pass bitty
•Lordship called to him several times, but:
Tooke apparently paid no attention. At thOtoill
slant another carriage came up, pa-sett
help
Charles and Mr. Tooke, and Lord' Charles %r,
determined to pass him , self. Mr: Tooke, 11, ,01,0
ever, either alarmed .by. the carriages passnig
or from want of skill, drove against a posti -
trr
the concussion one of the Ladies was thrown 5t
amid the consequences which' followed Were. Id
-Lord. Charles immediately
tip, got out of-his carriage, and anxiously al/4.es6r
every assistance hi his power to the•yoUngie
and.ber.:friends. On the'da
at the surgeon's, and requested, if it shouldhe
pear that lirs.rifise,nee was. ,at all necessary °eh
tore the. Coroner, that might be snWilif: nit
Thesiageon, hoever,,stated,,:that therify‘''
necesity for his appearance: 'The verdict.ic%sil
Coronet's. Jury, " Accidental .Dealki7:
the [.earned Cotoicel stated, that
affidavit' ffoni one' of t he Jurymen,
t'
• J e
bat': it Was
,the oPinion.nf•the--„,/,4

lat. no blame citig bt to . be: attached to,/

(matte's siiencer courditi.
* .0
howe:ver, a letter appeared in ants
pper, addressed, to the and r
;3'o t
ltelative;". That litter pifrporttd to row a.m. ficf.
reC.t account 9f the accident,which hatlll;'lqcoc"
in the King:s-road; and it ingorfed. r1i4.170-
casinu of the catastrophe entirely
rioni &lying of his L::rckhip, t:
p.A4
improper impittience to attempting, 16 001
the carri.Tc. e letter went on to stat 4 .00
the.ivitneSsei examined before: the Coroilcr 0
nnauittions in imputing the accident to' the 11,-,'0,1
4;'nce.iii Lord Ch;trlcs,, andlt conktine'd
upon his LUrflship's conduct, dictated ill.
oa.
(strongest, language. Since that time, a
letter had appeared in the sante. paper,..,Pignrij
Tooket expressing indignation at the. wanlif,olll:
which his Lordship had. treated the matter, 'IV.
Chail,s 'having gone to a bull aC AiniaClo °/101P1'
same night on. which the accident happeneavy.
never having once, sent to ;ntinire after the Wo'
The Learned Counsel said, that the assertioo two'
tamed in both theseietteis tsexc rinse anti
'lions, and -observed, that Lord Charles ha'
teceived certain anonymous Communicati iol;,r
which he hail
.been Charged with the ma
the young Lady. , li,P4,
Lord.ELLENnuaouon.—One does not know b!k`
have been negligent in dril.,in;, but 'that was not :‘t,t,
for a charge of Murder. It was Certain!), no
riot to have called 'upon the family after the accidelJ'isoll.
-Mr: ScArtLErr.—lle did call, Lord.' This is a j'•i
,
fur `!'vs--
Lord Et.m:Nuonovort.--You are not now moviOrt
mitiallithirruMion against,. Mr. Tooke, but awki'."7,l2 to -7
paper. If you can bring the olion3mous letters
Tooke, it is well.- You- may-then move fur a crin'''"
boPre'
mat ion against him.
. Mr. ScAnurt.---Threii witnesses were exarai:77n„„4°
the inquest', Air. Tooke, Mai v Sinith, and 1%11"-'r
0,0 e
T.l he ury were Unanimous in their op jui„, that thc
no improper driving on the, part of his LordshiP,:jeoc%re
only Mr. Tool:c wliu swore that there .was any nelig':':ebc :Jot
Lord EiLv.Nßonouciii.—tirete was d'ilturent
Gorinteithen, ir-Mr..Tooheliivore that there Was' ns
lrivinb.r • r
"(1
Mr. S'atir:hrr.--Yes, my Lord; but the, ewsP.
right to Statethat:tlii! witnesses were unanimous 00'
jeet. Ou the contrary, alt but Mr: ionic • •
eatl,l
teas no negligence on the part of his LOB
epreS
Lord ELLEN.I3:Rt4/G11.—.1 Iris is, certainly a mist p. to
*inn, and nPoir that.account I thinkyi.o eritit
rule to knotted.'

SOUTHWARK SESSIONS.
TatCo
~rtertlay the Sessions were held at thcll'
nail, Borough, before th i,
e Right Linn. j-,
MAYOR, the IA riColipt R, Mr. Aiderto"
witly
&c.: &c. ether -
"iyi,Prirst was found. :guilty of having, tag „ori
nearly 50 other pers,itis, rtotposlv aroi tilaj 1.1.C4C"
tiled,u i I he. Si ii•of l'asti't
anAbed for arrng Ore nes:: Jai Itippo, • „oil
„ rt“ 00
bovltig., been aiiniit c3f r 'Ft
ccigunieuileci trqttiy,!tv Rippour wcollkt " '
ten6e; arid The siclipt•s;‘ho'had •
r
for more than iwe ntUnitis. 1 * spite c'
. court, in pa.sing.seutetwe; ;,015
Fi',1"51,/ con itt rynteii t tre,l.t:Fs.ott ;hat u, cetlS7 orous.
gation ftiould di.ru; pain.of " ".f;ite'd
lsjt
tatlett: .iIY-kay'ul 'example 'IA, I
Iris titan ituprisOunrctit for atottwr utvt.ol2..

LoNooN lit C:1.11:SIIA 01 J
hY%C.III
Orninnti•strcet, Qiiti:!f-Sillare • .V1)1 1,414
t•:RIPPA,-(11 N 4. 7, 5%."•..u.t1i at•1.,;0;(1
• o:lice, No. 112, Strand ; wltcrt 41kIt•t•ttienIcnt,t
Lettvrs, 4c. (post-raid) Inuit

i . fir" ~ ~ , ~