The Sun.
London, England, 1845-02-19 00:00:00

NAGEMENT OF LIGHTHOUSES, &c.

Sir GEORGE CLERK requested the Hon. Member
fur Montrose to postpone for a time his motion respect-
ing the management of lighthouses, floating lights, &c.
It would be exceedingly inconvenient to bring it torward
that evening, and therefore it was that he requested the
Hon. Member to postpone it for a day or two.
Mr. HUME had no objection to its postponement.
He had nothing to say on a subject so well known, and
therefore if the Hon. Baronet would allow hizi to intro-
duce it, on some Government night, he would at once ac-
ccde to the Right Hon. Baronet's request. He would,
in the meantime, postpone it till Thursday week, and
the Right Hon. Baronet might, in the meantime, confer
with his colleagues, and let him (Mr. Hume) know if it
could be brought forward on that day.
The motion was then postponed.
POST-OFFICE ESPIONAGE.

Mr. DUNCOMBE, in rising to bring on the motion
of which he had given notice, namely, the unsatisfactory
and evasive nature of the report of the secret Committee
appointed to-inquire into the opening and &mining of
letters, said that he had promised the House, on the first
day of ele session, that he should call the attention of the
House to the unsatisfactory and evasive character of the
report emanating from the secret Committee ap-
mpthoueinchteinditctutaiotty i
intoctru
should
hrteho
ue
an
pt ootsht we-
onhffia tc
bee. h e
and
ds mightph painful
fruepllgi r
etdet
utretmyd
to fulfil the promise he had then made. He regretted
more that he could not have brought the subject on at
an earlier period, but his consolation was, that the fault
was not his. The report had been made at so late a
period of the last session, that it was quite impossible for
him to call the attention of the House to it et that time.
It was not his fault that he was obliged to call the atten-
tion of the House to it now, for, if that report had been
satisfactory, the necessity for such a course would have
been avoided. He needed not to remind the House as to
what occurred when the question was first introduced to
the House. They were all aware that he had the
honour of presenting a petition from M. Mazaini
and another gentleman complaining that their letters
had been opened. That petition was ordered to be
printed, and the Secretary of State at the time got up in
his place to give the House some explanation relative to
the matter. He had then stated, that certain letters
had been opened by virtue of a warrant granted by le-m,
but he refused to divulge the date when such warrant
was issued. A very short time afterwards, lee (Mr.
Duncombe) presented another petition from an officer
who had held a high position in the Polish service,
Captain Stoltman, complaining that his letters had been
opened and read, and on that occasion also the Right
Hon. Baronet had screened himself behind the mystery
in which he had originally enveloped himself. He
refused to say when the warrants in that
case were issued, and he (Mr. Duncombe) then
moved that that petition should be referred to a Select
Committee of the House. An objection was raised to
that motion ; but on a division of the House lie was sup-
ported by 164 and opposed by 108. thus giving a ma
jority of 56 in his favour. Not satisfied with that defeat,
the Government influenced the House, and on a Select
Committee being appointed to investigate into the prac-
tice of that department of her Majesty's Post-office com-
monly called the Secret Chamber, to inquire into its
workings and the authority by which it was constituted,
and report on the expediency of the law on which the
delay in the delivery of post letters was based, his wishes
were met by an amendment, that the Committee
should be a secret orke. lie (Mr, Duncombe) objected

at once to the constitution of that Committee. He ob-
jected to the course which the Government took—to the
course which the Right Hon. Baronet took—but his ob-
jections were over-ruled, and he was required to place
before that Board all the charges which he had made in
the House of Commons. He did not attend, and the
real reason he would tell them afterwards. There was
not an ind:vidual on that Committee in whom he could
trust—not one member in whom he had the smallest
confidence.—(Hear, hear.) He objected, lastly, that the
reports of the Secret Committee could not be satisfac-
tory to the country, as the reports of Secret Committees
never were; and if any man doubted the correctness of
that, he wished him to examine into the subject.
The Committee had instructions to furnish the
House with a report stating the origin of the
right in law, and the expediency for its con-
tinuance on the statute-book. The Right Hon. Baronet
having appointed and nominated his own jury—having,
as he said himself, referred his honour to that Commit-
tee—v et reserved to himself the privilege of addressing
the House in the event of the Committee's report being
unfavourable. He (Mr. Duncombe) also reserved to
himself the privilege of bringing up the question again,
provided the report of that Committee were unsatisfac-
tory, and in fu'filietent he, that evening, rose for a fresh
inquiry. If he made cut that in the statements put
forth in that report there was gross incorrectness, in-
stead of certainty. misconstruction instead of simple and
honest truth, reservation av; e e frankness was re-
quired, if he proved that the honour of En, hind, the
honour of the Geverninent ought to have commanded
that simple truths should have been given, and if he
showed that such had not been the case, then he thought
the House would grant that a searching inquiry was ab-
solutely necessary into one and every of his charges
sgainst the Government and against the Right Hon.
Baronet.—(Hear.) He was before that Committee
relied to prove the charges niate against the Right [lon.
Baronet in his place in Parliament, and he would read
from the paper what he said at the time, before that
Committee. He stated first, that in the precincts of
that Secret-office private correspondence was violated—
that in that place letters were opened, resealed, then
forwarded to their destination, and the correspondence
itself sent to foreign and despotic Powers. He stated,
that the Secretary of State for the Home Department
had exceeded his powers, and had made a most uncon-
stitutional and dishonourable use of the powers en-
trusted to him.—(Hear, hear.) He had added, that
there were more letters opened during the
time he had been in office, than in that of any
Secretary who had preceded him. He stated that he
had received letters from foreigners, complaining that
the hospitality of England had been violated; that their
letters had been opened at the instigation of foreign
despots, and that their correspondence bad been com-
municated to those Powers, and that imprisonments,
banishments, and deaths on the scaffold, were the conse-
quences of those communicotions. He stated also that
the correspondence of the Foreign Ambassadors was
subjected to the inspection of her Majesty's Ministers.
Ilis(Mr. Duncombe's) letters also—the letters of a Mem-
ber of that House—his correspondence had been vio-
lated—his letters had been detained and opened.
That was the bill of indictment he was called on to prove
before the Committee. How were these charges met ?
How did they find them explained in the report of the
Secret Committee ? Let Hon. Members read it, and they
would find that not one of his charges had been contra-
dicted. It seemed as if the Right Hon. Baronet had
given them their instructions in these words, " Explain
nothing, mystify every thing."—(Laughter.) They had
not met one of his allegations ; but if their instructions
were merely considered, they had well done their duty.
—(Continued laughter.) The Committee was, in the
first place, to inquire into the state of the law, and
also to inquire into the mode in which it had been
executed before that time; and as if that were not suffi-
ciently expressive, they were to inquire into the cir-
cumstances under which any warrant was issued, so that
they might infer from those instructions at least that
the truth was required to come out. But how did the
Committee begin their work ? They assumed that the
law of 1844 was analogous to that of 1711, when the
Act of Queen Acne was first passed, but they ought to
recollect that the circumstances which that law was in-
tended to meet were somewhat peculiar. The law of
1844 having been assumed to be that of Queen Anne's,
the Committee proposed to give the history of the mat-
ter, but not one word more did they give of the
state of the law. They thought they were obeying their
instructions by going back to the time of Edward the
Second, and their report was full of very valuable anti-
quarian research, for at least two-thirds of it was filled
with antiquarian knowledge. They cave the number of
warrants issued by the Duke of Newcastle, by Lord Car
marthen, and by others, but what the House wanted was
a copy of the warrants issued by Sir James Graham
—:Laughter.) Not one of the warrants to the
manufacturing districts were given,—not one war-
rant of the present century had they condercet ded
to give the House. They went on telling them that the
trial of various individuals proved that the practice had
existed in former times, because letters written to At-
terbury the Bishop of Rochester, and to other persons,
were produced upon their trials. But they had not
stated that those letters had been detained by virtue of
a Secretary of State's warrant—they only stated the fact
that on the trials of the Bishop of Rochester, and of
others, those letters were produced. lie found that
on the trial of Bishop Atterbury, an objection was
t :ken, and the counsel in the case, in examining a wit-
ness, asked if the letters were detained under a warrant
from the Secretary of State. The question was not
allowed to he answered by the bench. If any of these
cases proved that a warrant from the Secretary of State
had been issued at all, lie thought it might equally be
inferred that some one of the clerks had done it on his
own responsibility, or it might be that a regular search-
warrant had been granted for the search of papers. If
they issued a warrant to search for papers, all indivi-
duals knew what they wanted, and knew also that they
were entitled to issue such. But to reseal letters—to
commit a forgery, fort it was nothing less, and to send
those letters to their original addresses, oh it was
a most iniquitous and most unworthy system—too
unworthy for any Minister of any country.—(Cheers.)
The Committee said in their report, in reference to
what had been done in this way in former times, that
this power was not permitted to be used in the Post-
office without the express authority of Government; but
that authority having been given in a certain portion of
the year 1742, " certain letters were then somewhat
rudely pried into." Now, he (Mr. Duncombe) would
not say whether the Committee of 1742 were properly
doing their duty or not, by those letters that had been
" somewhat rudely pried into;" but this he would say.
that this was a compliment which the report now before
him had taken care not to pay those whose letters of late
had been " somewhat rudely pried into."—(Cheers and
laughter.) Neither would he say that it was the busi-
ness of the Committee to do so; hut, as they had not
somewhat rudely pried into " the manner in which this
power of opening letters had been exercised by the Right
lion. Gentleman opposite, he would do it.—(Cheers and
laughter). By referring to the Appendix of the Commit-
tee's report, the House would find that this extraordi-
nary rudeness had been taken by that Committee.
namely, that they did examine into the extent to which
this opening of letters had been carried on, and that
was the whole of the "extreme rudeness" which they
had to communicate to the public.—(Laughter.) Now,
if this wonderful Committee were to conceive it part of
their business to tell the House what the Government of
two or three hundred years ago thought proper to do,
or what had happened in reference to the opening of
letters at that distant period of time, surely any person,
upon reading that report, would exclaim, " God bless
me, how very important and interesting must not this
report be, when it comes somewhat nearer to 'our
own time."—(Cheers and laughter.) Now, although he
was willing to give the Committee every credit for the
deep research they displayed, yet he could not help say-
ing that the result of that research afforded no evidence
as to the facts he wanted to come at ; but, on the con-
trary, upon this point he should say the Committee's re-
search had all evaporated, and they appeared to have be-
come most unaccountably and unintelligibly reserved.—
(Renewed cheers and laughter.) Nay, more, he thought
that before he sat down he could satisfy the House that
the Committee had not obej ed the resolutions of the
House upon the subject.—(Hear.) The Committee, in
their report, stated that strict adherence a as paid to the
conditions of the warrant, and yet, while they said in
that part of it the law had been obeyed, it, in fact, had
not been obeyed ; and this was one of his (Mr. Dun-
come's) specific complaints against the pretest Govern-
talent, and one on which the public had a right to be
satisfied.--(Hear, hear.) And why had not th:s
satisfaction been afforded by the report ? The
answer was plain, it was this—that if it were
to be given, it would have compel:cd the Com-
mittee to have entered the Secret Chamher—(Hear,
hear)—and if they did that, they should hive betrayed
all the secrets of that Chamber. And here let him say,
in reference to this Secret Chamber, he had seen by the
papers of the day that that office had been abolished.
Here the Hon. Member read a paragraph frem some
paper to the above effect, and then continued. Well, he
had supposed that this secret offiee had been closed, oi-
rather. let him say, as the lawyers did, that the offs,,
had not been closed, they had only " changed the veai,e"
—(Laughter)—and he would ask what, signified it to the
public in what place that secret partment was held, so
long as the practice continued ?—(Hear, hear.) It mat-
tered not whether it was held in the Home-office or in
S-. Martin's-le-Grand, so long as it was held anywhere;
and held lie believed it would be, because it was
held by authority of an Act of Parliament, and
nothing but an Act of Parliament could deprive the
Government of that power.—(Hear, hear.) In respect
to the Committee, he should say, his opinion was, that
they had not fulfilled the intention of that House, either
as to the state of the law upon this subject, or as to
the number of letters that had been opened during the
period mentioned. And he would further say that
the Right Hon. Baronet, the Secretary of State for the
Home Department, had exceeded his powers, had made
the most unscrupulous use of his power, and had not
stated the number of letters that had been opened.—
(Hear, hear, and cheers.) Here the Hon. Member
again referred to the report, and having read a pas,age,
then went on to say that it appeared by it that 372
warrants, authorising the opening of letters, had been
issued during the last century ; of these, 300 were
issued for criminal purposes—that was to say, warrants
authorising the opening of letters by reading the cont. nts
of which, certain projected murders, robberies, forgeries,
persons engaged in plans for defrauding the revenue,
&c., Sec., were to be detected. But let the House bear
in mind that there was a great and marked differ-
ence between warrants issued for the detection of cri-
minal offenders and those of a political character. The
" criminal warrants," if he might so call them, affected an
individual, and were directed against an individual only.
Letters against which they were directed were opened,
with a view to ascertain the name and address of an in-
dividual, while the political warrants were of a very dif-
ferent character. Now, by the report of the Committee
it appeared that from the year 1841 to the end of the
year 1844, being three years that the Hon. Baronot was

-J them
in office, the number of those warrants issued nti Ist
exceeded all precedent of former Governments. ode,
time, up to the year 1844, when this report vvitsiosr
the present Government had issued as many as id'
rants in three years.—(Hear, hear.) Now, °2OlOl
ing over the whole of the report, he could not "nrial
anything at all Eke the number of 44 such warrao_' ta
been issued in any three years, notwithstanle,s
great research and labour displayed by the Conto3 ttal
(Cheers an laughter.) It appeared by the seP"risbo
Lord Sidmouth, in the rear 1812.—rather a relp°,retd
period—issued -welva warrants, and that was eo°-!
an extremely large number ; yet the Bon. 13aroneriitst,4
(Home Secretary), in more recent and less ren3l4
times, exceeded Lord Sidmouth by five.--(1141
laughter.) Again, he would say that the .1" al
roast had made a most unscrupulous use of this Pclol
and that was most apparent in the use lie had 1.1
that poker against the two foreigners, M. Mtlazlriletr
Capt. Stoltmxn.—(Loud cries of " Hear, bean"), iff
lieved the country had not on record any install-13d
miler conduct to such an extent.—(Hear. hear.)
rite
Hon. Baronet had said that her Majesty's G°veflorrig
had so used this power at the instigation of a 5 ttl:
power, hem whom they had had communication tilt
led to such a proceeding. Now, he would call ulr'o°4 06
House to mark the error of the report in this 401
The warrant was issued on the 34 of Match, a.")„, 31.
cancelled on the 13th of June, and thereflar
Mazzini had no cause of complaint. But he (Idnleser:
combs welted contend for it that M. Mazzin",l
were opened on the 14th of June, the very dt'Y b 0 tar''
(Mr. Duncombe) presented his pe.ition.—(Heaari
Therefore it would appear that letters had been 101,1
at times when there was no authority to t, 01,0411",
was his firm belief that the warrant had been au 05P
hsl
far the occasion-- (Hear, h ar)—and that d:11, -
system on which this practice was fo8n„-
been conducted, to say the least of '" Of P.,'
most loose manner. But now mark the err°r,,oolt
report. The House of Lords, in their report, tuft sl"li
subject say, that " Letters had heen opened Onttalr
four months." Now, be (Mr. Duncembe) °)15.151,
that the warrant was in force from Christmas a,
June' 1844 ; and he would ask, was a na,t;nit DOv',.l
consideted nothirg in a period during "'n,sseroe
letters were to be opened ?—(llcar, hear.)
he would say, that the Governmant were in l'l° OP;
cament— that letters had been opened from thnbeich tb
previous and subsequent to the times at :Lod tif
report states that the warrant had been 1" ritor,,
cancelled, and, therefore, there was a gross err° site 'e
report —Meer, hear.) did not mean totted
any intentional mistake to them, for lie 1.w,1,it.c:61, tit
had been imposed on. This, also, he beneta'too,
those letters to which he had been calling at"' rOveil,
been opened at the instigation of a Foreign ort
but the reason assigned by that Power for °P ieetOs!
Mazzini's letters was that he had been secretlf twat;
ing an insurrection against that Power, anclitylo,roe
British Government,therefore, had their aulb°lersP,s
proceeding from "High Sources." Nowswhast,,- se id
"high sources?" They were not stated in t`"eepris
the report did not state that M. Mazzini ava9hts
of those charges, or obnoxious to them; seirteral
Committee had heard M. Mazzini himself, t"0001110
would then have had to give a very different rote
the transaction.—(Hear, hear.) But Imair' sti
contradiction in the report. It not only utda 10/
the "high sources," but it distinctly sat foe ("AO
letters were opened, " nett at the sagges'ihstertdt
foreign Power.—(Hear, hear.) But, notra bad "?
this, it appeared that " such information a° e0001)1
elicited from those so-opened letters had bean Ist oi
cated to those foreign Powers."—(Hear, be°%slte'd
House of Lords, the Marquis of NormailbYs tbe,Ylio
Duke of Wellington was this the fact ? an-ester,/ 'oat
Duke said he knew nothing about it—(Lay' cls'.°P
the Earl of Aberdeen, in reply to the eaß'eotnel.
said he could assure the Noble Marquis that Pe rO,O
the sort bad been communicated to any f°,re:tett'q'bje6
—(Hear.) Well, then, to what other con°,;°;hedt
at liberty to arrive upon this part o',"soortsil
than this, that there was gross falsehooo
between this House and the other House, bsuosos„ilV
was not for him to say —(Hear)--but this P-tbe fo/
that some explanation was due not only o'4 i°
public, but to all foreign Powers and foreignsity,"oo
(Cheers.) Well, then, the report went 00 tt° O?,
the course adopted by the Government "netl"rjigt itesosto
done than to frustrate the attempt to ereatestierr°ll,oL/
tion." But he would ask, was that the Piro.riehlteid
adopt ? Was that a course worthy of r'nboritir
(Hear, hear.) Was that the course for the ttao9l
vernment to adopt to frustrate an, hili,se 1112,4
which was involved the lives, perhaps, or !"-popybtf
nate individuals?—(Hear, hear.),lf he (ALr'weity,
had appeared before the Committee, be soon '
shown that 13/I.lllazzini had got a letter from s° we!"
and misguided men, to the effect that they
Need
make a descent upon some of the Papal stwcoulel44l°
States ; that M. Mazzini had done all bet, nie,prr
suede them from so rash an act ; that they A4ll
tO '
his advice, but it was then too late
to fric,r ',yes
Government sent their agents to t.,°ra OA°Ol6
courage on those unfortunate men, 51i tpLi_iir
delusion induced them to retire from Corfu 'llO,O
where they had ordered their ships. This, .
at the instigation of the British Got/o'l'o°h" ivilier
unfortunate men, thus betrayed, ware tried I,secustleof
commission, and very shortly after ivereoel °sots
(Hear, hear.) The Hon. Member then,,r'tao el',
from two of those who had been executer tite'', t!;
Admiral Bandieri—in which they express° titailifsl'l
viction of the wrong course they had been reisinolit'
Glared themselves satisfied to expiate tbeire"l/4 ttle
their blood, and died crying out Viva Italisboseol,ol.'
Such was the way in which the British 010';
took mea-ures for frustrating the totem'," °;) Olt(
to disturb the peace of our allies.—(Chneer)ou''''
ot
(said the Hon. Gentleman with much vehernenool°,
not say to those individuals openly and nAgheir ;,ebr,
that their proceedings were known, that slleettSi
would be frustrated, that they could 13,.!, did
plot on British ground ?—(Cheers.) VvilYßadsslnstei
tell them that they were rushing into l'n'n' ) Iffel
must desist from their course? —'Cheer,,s'osavd,ol
could have done—(Hear)—and the; weld' 00 bk.
to you.—(Hear.) No ; but instead of thatiltaelfaiolb
t
them over to the foreign Government, anresee-f
is as much on the heads of her Majesty's tools° .3,113
ters—(Cheers)—aye, more so than on theßiser.'osl
individuals who were ordered to pull the htich is Itto tt
if the monument, which I hope to see, and vfr ittc4o
be ever erected to the memory of those tne,r,
inscribed on their tombstone that they o'i, ria'hioredei
their country and liberty, through the trey e enoo
Government; and the inscription, I bebei'etasn)
true."—(Great cheering.) The Hon. Gentr, aesr;talvel
to say that that was not the only case.--(Headisel be tbs
tain Stoltman, an officer in the Polish artiq'tjt safhelieg
.14
M. Mazziol, that his letters had been oPeneesllo,..- 101e.ser
for inquiry and redress. But he was o",t „to tinol'lder,
Committee. No information had been give-the C°P-istv)o
to the warrants in his case ; but although, thafteidta°
0
were not so fatal, in reference 1° /01
tion given to the foreign elnbssY' the I) rtstbP
been in the case of M. Mazziut, Yet The 'fish, rot'
were most disgraceful to the Government. on `;t118,0'
issued on the 17th of April, and was witlidnate oisfroriy
June. Now he did not complain as tootf sirtiol
rants. But all he had to say was, this gt as .11,4 fol
dente with Mr. Galiski in Paris was openedtie 10;01 I
correspondence of Mr. Wursell. No one_etition eV,
gentleman's name until he presented his r.'t,, of
inquiry, that he might have the opportunity 0
stain cast upon his character by an insinuatittonto seeoe
report of the Committee. Mr. Gahski do, _,ber
' residing in Paris at the time referre v., it
another gentleman who was not named. ands.`:4 °PA(
Galiski to be held up to reproach!tto st !..7.,0 :00
gentleman not named? but the Como' h,a fuv,-s tY
was alleged against those two men that they vise o
4,/,
sign to assassinate a foreign Sovereign, 70700eitteebe al; JO
her Majesty. Now, why 'did not the C_isit to t te
Sovereign. There were two here on a ,saeorll'o.isst
th
the Emperor of Russia and the King
design
to 0,4 Of/JO
they not say which of them it was e oicgtu_
(" Hear," and a laugh.) The Committee
allegations against those gentlemen was tuiete the gee( to "
opening of their letters, at the
'arnesei ate th°seAle°l:./C°11;
thought that there was nothing to er,—,,itne Hon. • if tee," )
whom they had reluctantly named.—( ''effect.) old
read at length the extract to the above,
__eon ,er
mittee were reluctant to name those gentite.w..,d, ottsii !reg.,
the foul imputation of murder, why did
uile,Y. , At of
Nobody asked them.—( Hear and a la gl:critoss 01;A:
when they did impute to those gentlemen "I.‘„rtun"24
the °Pr etriu* ei
they ought to have given them a 5 a 0 oer,
eating their character. Mr. Wursall hon .or.,
Polish family, and a man of unblem
_Tssiotioineetes'el tVei
incapable of thinking of the crime of 5'
athose ghee„tobli'bootbv
As the opportunity was not given to taic rsore o
fend themselves before the Committee
t_
so be. 0p0,,,
rl
charge, they ought to be allowed to M.lO, caift:c! be tttbe~
Committee, and that was what he n° it seenlaos,.i,
House to grant. In such a Comnairttragierty tsue4,,
al:;00pr
that what lie had stated was ee „, Bus, s
~,e
were, at the time of the Emperor 'Jest" totscsedo,'
the Queen, Russian spies here. Those ',,ro A Sr :0
of that visit which the Emperor made, ,e,. afajes lieseeest,o,
enee to himself, as they were toldon
s"
vet. tbee e gel/
(A laugh)—to ingratiate thems
to their b°°- the'eta's
bassy, and to obtain leave to returnea,
_e, Her
gojes It/
For this purpose they invented the
.011'1... ' Her. Aistotrwet,
men, and carried it to the Amba... 1
but tritblesie'4blaiP;
tvlngmteon teraiTidn
criminate
eiotnh
et accusation.haeccused
e.te
ma anodt lbezwo Kitt
g -nr native .s- (1" the ith
they wanted, and returned to their it of
kere t arivie
an amnesty immediately after there lef
wn"
whilst the injured gentlemen
I t be thrn 0305' thr,
ae. o
foul stain of murderers Woe' eot Con_ thst
a Committee of the British kio,useet ber... petit
hear.) He (Mr. Duncombe) (Da
they were dichlasfy ed I'9
vernment were aware of what
toffsth n hot
the
ee
Poles
imparted parte
theird
owntite cco„rurnetstpxons,de_ednothpee:e' oght e cell.o,ll,sotri
the Government was requested 10
contained re °f i° fer
sometimes have to say that tuey went ova koe9 0
of family concern. Was the Givteprpneeeirseonnt
itnichpaatoulasuobjefc_r°ttbe:o:;
—( Hear, hear.) There were
.
in Poland. One to prohibit a
getter °" Elearioreb"
responding with an exile, 110
and o,igg•-•;-vith soy,, of t.cieo
the penalty of imprisonmentfrealvonnad:nretehedootobtelr":o;eoPl,ooooi
England,An o he r decreeunder
Pennski ;as ett
inWrirtibrough
decrees, the Countess
S°v•i h her 1000- counten islo„ee'
of having corresponded with
hear.) The
exile, 01,70prie,',/
tfhoerbsaadtte,eall coit
of foreign ladies.--( nesr'riting t'/,„a„Ilb nd, ,*l°,e'esaticrPeie,
le
aVnadl di for
received
fifty comes Pe
ann
severedore
was also imprisoned for
~th helr;eauniistaeibuca,obillara-tiusor,.:ll‘i.ltreo•
ws_ies__ltadeser
_a that
~ste
Ail these had been done un d Inc
cries o'o' cosnufiskil,oo:l
hadca:7edrn _
_nt,
feet of raker 0
the other, d‘aYfiesr, 11,010'000i
Majesty.—(Loud
ir
jes
ty whose.
the Go r,"e_t the e
.41 !at
were notes ware tna „act! 04 br%leg ,)
was satisivedsLitotuhthdat
correspondence; •
ife cortespo ,he hot ~d,r
to the Emperor that a .
_ninent, aria beary-ifeir,o,;(::::ei
was to subject her to imp
the
n from her fovent 01" cl▪ or6is
15k,---stlea.'cus h
hcoerrp:hraLildpreunni%,sh.
t then, to be i'rerlather, fordo
Ought not this Governmen
c,e foreign, saosse
betrayed any corresponlen( to
Herr, hear.),potideer.4 faer;rioo▪ ut
between their subjects . .
would be take
ambassadors. The House
1.:„0 tbe,st/A which he had made was that Of
ld ic:rgitinee ,filftbs:e f°-!`joiC°lf
receiving an ambassador,
.a..1_,d0,737What 10`.....saltieor°,j0,56F
smile of geodanatered euriu!;/__IA •01as stye)
to. • k the poCOP.
from your coati, the letters .r.
Fah( lad read anwhen he 02
E Renewed laughter.)
_/

~"<F:

issued bi:ththe:
Iments• oade,
report vvas,4
many as iotA•
Now, on dojo
luld not 6n„
lei, warraa tba
withstand
he Cortimit;(oo
k
the rert.'• tO
ler a re
at was dit
con,„' iy
t t
on. 13arone
less re°3r
lve.—(ll°4
at the
11°1' t'
se of this P (1,0
he had tae. doa
M. Maalitillett
Owen") pi
• -Once
ny 0 •
r. hear.era,;,,
)
, noyt
s ". Orel'
tt,:on of a 5 it
Muttietiti°l/ 0
11(1 calla 11°4,4
t in this red 4-0)
Mas eh, an 31,
ul thereforevoi,
tot he (,rietteP
Mazziaisoferill
cry naystie)j
had been
adds,to do so,;reasrll4„
been t pbr
that the bdl
ett
s foto° s
t
nt•it,
of 1,0
the err°r tlf
011 er tog
7 r,p , for
opened
,ntesP„
io.be) cu
:Is ristrosibi
a moot
hich is Po
e
rig v`l Ther'reir
acar/ • p
in 019 06
ere
from tun e ,
• viblel ar4
been tsar is tbt
'Toss er'nrwan toyedlll4,,
he helitd, t 1
he beliegtoo,l:o
ling Olen rOOO
Foreign
3r for °Pe.004,,
seeretlY lot
err, andg
,4 •
hat t
be r 0
icersore
v' • the °Pits°
ed 004
in i I,va but 0,A4
them; Teo(
mself, °el isSieo
iffereat 'thee .0
t EasTAlt pot vie
my w" tbel
a toJ
ly s 000 44
suggesoool,o
not r" bad
ttion as
cony
ed been ) ISI
ar, hest. 4eo
by
tbe
? anubtirre
he saß-otbill°o
Li; that 114 rod,,
fore.- yoe6
;n fore.-
et
rt •
of t-eole/t.
sehood 5°0.04,4
bat eld
use,
; this bebe
my too 4070
fOreig
lt to
ro'redrsil
create cod !/
• proP% hoe 6:
of Ere' .tio io
on
For the opt,,,
Otte pfo')
an se tov
;, of tb°Dtioccioll
e
he • eel's
15°Inteo1,S°
t the Tort
• onclotiltioJ"
11 he nie
theY behe A4° •
tor t- tY
;0 Cor,reopO,ye
na COre
en, 5 tO
ill-. F. ie
J JO
This
.1,00 ,1111.1/
tr• d bi eeurtier
e$ ,1
were
_a § 4,5
,hen re'wo !`ca°.
t. 41-1 their 0r
,presseutoolog',i[lll
heel/ eritilfie#4'
e their i
„
Italik.ofe
'ritish „wit,
0(11' 01, •,1
mP" .
(c hee.f4o6,)
vehenle
ag° • de
„a
ro belt
that t o°oo°'
he thel
Wily • did
,a,t,nl
h.
eers•
.)
you °op I)hirl
thnt, /heir '°'t
), _ A t
lltt snmgeotl
pr- u,
'the e'''r.
be trig' 0 to tiof
t ch ss
wbl 'eggcseet)
went, 111 BAt of
fell le oidforeteel
earhetl a ,
jieve, ,o
~,tioheo4,
'brJ
Hearijoofeebd
-
incl bide `0
enet• l, -ed bei. 'est
of the 'let"
to „gel",
`°- °"" So'lo'
h tb° el le
to 0 itedlio
OY, the Pr7dotof
et Ihe
oe", gol.;',r,
iraali° tell of tt;Wty
he co•spoA/
olettif prO, wict
nearerher' •tsgof $
41
eV ' P7'o6
ip,pity
°lptiO.e:eil
co .4,0 I,
1,. ~op je
• odo ,'er
t..147.by • ,h
thae tbity
1, 4°,06040
titteed form', 900
ey 00
$9 0
'll°`°
•ttee (20ectIJ
orawl the orb/ o/
visit ° ,tete
t
f 1 •
$1" 04 04
nr7hoghotustltoie,
ligeient t 10°01;
ime the toiler op
thoef
itoco.
jf
ffectol 01ti( 4'10;4;
neth; 0)7 e'erier,/
eY • At foa or
ite)cri 01:et: 0 f_if 11' 11:
porttill'tjef u tier)
'P teettl Oet•
3 a 11,00ar'( 0 et"
'61,11 oti•es la the
Sentielibeipter,
,se Kea „b 0,
v
tailed
o°l4 V;t
it o.e. tb 10,i;,01
ly Roe kso te'
too oce° 11/
91:ear„t,:sref,0'
,i;iott
0000401
ti; I;nd ce:ete;
,r home these.,o
upon , ;e§.l 00,4
Y r lukniof 440,1
L'c t Spies pot .0e
itheo pies •htt).:;
lid the
d. dirt
"'of the oitb ti
here
apon tbe
.....( roe
!W•
Yl' ong' the sfr
Coto° tbst tifris
elle/a oiaeto,re,
doing:fetl beo„l4
hich PLere. iro,4
exiles " 001 ,ttef
letters, bot taoit.
°thing he re forci
itavore of t io cor
twookaos alp
°>< r°t 0,,)
rih t gubjec
nii' h all of 9.a0
boritl dric•lo
he °it the gu'eeo
e..„,ek the° el°,
through,-
cooliesa J!eotsrj
exile, °wed/
0.0 1 ip.
• erss° sreir
S4l:teti /lee
of tbBt
rtg0t0,.,,)
odi
Yile°er,
of per f
,„1
I vi"", t brltTes tP.
e 1110;....be5,
bear oeir n' 113
`-‘ oto Odo
„claw op,
ebArro
,olfeelthele Ord
An° of
,Ae
lideVeeA
allle."Ci011
,p - tor. IV; gl)
'e vitb,re Yer;ol
at:eto
oba threvioto
));:e
tole) tlie
Palie°