The Sun.
London, England, 1811-02-22 00:00:00

PAYMASTER OF MARINES.

Mr. H. MARTIN asked, whether, hi contegnence
of the report of thq Connniuee any ed.lniwi hAd
been tnade to the salary Nytitabter.of Ma.,aeq ?
To which question-' Mr. Yorke 'replied in tli
tta-
£ot
Mr. MARTIN Wilted to know whether any altor-
at.on had been made in the Office`ot Paym3A.ei ut
Pensinvs ?

CHANCHLLRII of the ExcumuEtt in
the affirmative; but that tt !lad uot yet th!ett aLte.l
upon.

MOTIONS "AND ORPERfi O THE ,DAV

The CHANCIII.4.OR;Or tllO &CCU EQUIM St110(10 th4t
be should on Monday rnitk4 hiq. motion recipect.,
ing the arrangement of the Orders of the
and Motions. n It was not his -intention to alt• r
the question of right.as -to making motions witlmot
haVing first given notice,- but only to-propose, ihtt
nn certain days .of the week precedence shooti be
given to Orders or the Day, and on certain other
days to Motions.

Mr. WHIIIIRRAD expressed himself r4ther utii•
forttinate that he had a no!iee at a Motion'htamr-
log (or Monday, when the Right Hop, Gefolvolaa
wooid nodoabt precede him. -fhe.-I•Pm.
min moved for-Copies of the Mitnitet tetert rvtpticto
ini thr Exchequer Bill Ottiee.—Ordered.
Report of the Sopply was brought -rip; at d
ngreed to.
SIR. GEORGE it \t2l.OW.

CRE,glve (,)W to MOVt, tot. torther Papers
respettiog.the coodott of tits Goverrunt..nt
In tin! f. 1111414 o movirig tor tliem, the Hon.
advvrteil to the late t,.ransattionq in thA',.
cit)..jr;eri, am' mictil)ed to the con,Jutt of Sir thori.
kg

Barlow, the iate agnat,tons in'a ;gteat mcasttre to
have al oleo. To *hew that his Condnet was not ap•
proved by the Court tit Dire&ors, Major Boles (sus-
pended by the 00Vet ,ment of Madras) had been
restoredbreaUse they tbund that his , of-
fence consisted in obedience to his superior officer,—
The Paperm necessary to elecidate this and other
transitetions were what he anted. The other
transattions referred to the vials of three Ott-leers,
Cblotiets Bell and Doveton, and Major _Story From
Om papers, ,I.triien tot niqbed, it would be seen, that

F` . .
the Courts Muted which tried them WelVill variance
with eactother. The Hon. Gentleman next noticed'
I: the traneatlions respecting the creditors of the Na-
,,
;hob of the earnreic. For ' the liquidation of the
debts of that Ponce a fund of five millions hid beet,
•
set reeirt. In inquiring Into these claims of the crc-
-1,. stir{rs, a i)erson timed Ruddy flow, one of the na-
. , .
twes, WVISIMpriC lied on various charges 3.. and the
. were
expences ordered to be paid out of this fund,
He next mentioned a 'charge. against the Govern-
Merit, of having removed a Mr. Roebuck to an tin
healthy, spot, in the country, where in a few weetia
be died ; and also that a Magistrate (Mr. Maitland),
who had committed this Ruddy Row, was removed,
together with others who, had tendered themselves
obnoxious to Sir George, under these circumstencea.
The bond for which Ruddy Row was found guilty
of forgery, by .a ' Btitish Jury, was one of a great
number; notwithstanding, so much did the Chief
justice; Sir J:Stratige, Interest himself, that he sent
to England for his pardon, but he had taken a dose
of prison. The Hon. Gentleman, alter making
some further observations, stated bis intention to
move for the recall of Sir George Barlow, and con-
cluded with moving, '‘..4 Pie; copies; of certain let.
teeseliddressed• to Sir George Barlow, front the real
creditors of the late Nabob of the Carnatic, Ike."
• Mr. G. Gilmer maintained, that the statement of
the Hon. Gentleman was a very aggravated one ;
the acts end intentions of Sir G. Barlow had been
coloured and distorted, as 1 he ,papers when produced
would Shew. He' . wished thetefore to say a few
words on the subjett, The origin of the Carnatic
debt'Was this ; a sort of corruption had been going
on for years ; Whep the territory of the Nabob was
eeded to the Indian Governineet, in order to loves»
floe fairly the claim of the creditors, and proem
anruotounded or unjust claim., it was judged ne-
cessary to appient Cienmeisitriters to sit in England
and Madras--that was before Sir George Barlow
came to the Goveentnent at that time, viz. when
. Mr. Petrie was at the head. There was a manufac-
ture of forged- bonds, purporriug to be those of the
Nabob, brought into the public market for sale; a
Committee of Inquiry was forincd, of which Com-
mittee the Law °flit:els were members; and it was
found that, to a
,certain extent, forged bonds were in
circulation. A prosecution eas instituted against a
native, one Pupeia Bratninee, and treprose this
charge the CC/04)11634MM selectee! [toddy Row ;
but Popeia instituted a counter-oharge for forgery
against Roddy, scd by a dexterous tnanceuvre got
him conviCted. With respect to Mr. Roetreck, lee
was charged nut On account of the. Carnatic debts,.
but as holding laetious setetments, although one of
the principal officers of the Government; the Con-
sequence was, that he was sent to one of the most
healthy spots on the banks of the sea, and died, not
as had been stared, in a few days, but some months
after, quite advanced in years. As to Mr. Maitland,
he was rereoved for not discharging his dieter as' a
Magistrate. Without entering nee a refutation of
the charges, all that Ise icquired was, that Gentle-
men would suspend their opinions on the caedutt
of Sir George 13arlow till the whole of the paws'
were before the Horse. All that the Company de-
sired was at compide investigation, without passion
or prejudice: Thus far he would say, that the
'conduct of Sir George Barlow would entitle him to
the approbation, not only of the House, but of the
country. ,
Lord IF.sr.KSTONR supported the opinions of his
non. Friend (Mr. Greet ey), with respect to the eon-
dud of Sir C.G. Barlow, whom he considered HS have
ing been• the means of creating the disturbances come
plained of. , .
Mr. Wet Lees contended that the conduct of Sir
-George Barlow was highly commendable. He had
to struggle with mutinous parties, and was, 111 sop-
ported by the Members. of his ,own Government.
The Noble fend had complained of Sir Genrgee but
had helorgot the cominitt of General M`Dowall,
which first led to the disturbances ? It was easy,
sitting in this House, to canvass the conduct of
Fublic Otto :=r, hot if 'those Gentlemen, so prone
to censure, were in the place of Sir Georges Bar-
loW, they would nut- only think, but act differently.
Lord Fueeseorerieselained.
' Sir T. Teinroe declared, that it- wes evideut the
eauscs of the law l'ehenion in India rested solely
with the Governmeet of Madras. Ha did not,
*semi to say that they had caused the rebellion, but
that it was founded on something (whether right or
wrote; be woulii riot now preteod to determine)
which they kid done,; An him. Gentleinut oppo.
site had depr.cnted the condeothation of Sir George
}kaki*, until the papers illestraiive of his conduei
.should be prodeeed ; tie it s —but the ,aerie nava-
Sere of justice wits uneeemionebly due to the team-
tuoate General 'lll`Dowell. It wax very piobable
that Sir G. Barlow might Itaye beer; only tirM; but
tmtil he saw proof to the cinerary,. ill tlit: papers
'which were to be goer lured, he could not help
thinking that that Hoe, Batoitet in, substituting ob-
duracy for firantees, had en :angered the loss of our
Indian empire; en empirte which, he would repeat,
we had obtained by our crimes, 'Which we were, en-
tabled to carry on only by' .our injustices and which
we should efrobebly lose by our folly, He (Sir T.
To censured in strong terms the conettri of the Di-
e-Mora as exhibited in their diseetell of September
ie, in .ehieh-they refused to hear Geoeral Mee-
dowall's defence, and in which the inconsistency
oppeeree elapproving in the hest instance of '' the
whole'. of the eeetee put sited by sir G. Barlow,
reel then of con.teinnieg the stispenstoo of Mejor
14fiWie3. As for the civil pert of the question, it
del not appear to him that there had been any
venue] forie, interference or the Home Gotern-
inetit on the repreeentattoo .of the Cortunissionera.
tit all the subjects connected with our Indian
V,vtPle, which requited im'iliediate and serious iir-
et %are" air. tarsi anCiirtd to him tv by time. ute

::-.lt
il
r ,t.
I,
;,I
4 li

, 1.1},,
,e,
.1 ,
'
, ',;

it. , '',l

A ;
a iz

U

~'+
:~~

gent tun the mode administering indicts In that •
country.
Mr. Waeets explained.
Mr. Duevas condemned the , introdu&ion into
the diicussion of topics, on which, under the prea
sent circumstances, the House wars not
,coMpetent ,
to pronounce. This prejudging of important ques
dons was fair neither to the individuals immediately '
concerned, nor to the House itself. The Hon. Bits .
roost had complaitA of the mention which, had
been made by his Hun.` Friend of Gen. M'Dowall,
but how was it possible, in adverting to the origin of
the disturbances at Madras, to. ruid this The
Hon. Baronet had also roost unjustly censured 'the
dispatch of the Court of Direelors as inconsistent,
since it contained an approbation of the whole eon-,
duct of Sir G. Barlow. Instead• of this, however,
it was, distinctly stated, that
,in the opinien, of the
Dirt:aura', the Madras Government hadhot entirely,
condueted itself to their satislattion, which' Was:
rendered evident: by the subsequent instructions to
that Government, to reinstate Major Bowies in the
service. The Finn. Mover, in rather - a Sneering
kind of way, had animadverted on. the conduct of
the Chief Justice of Madras, and of the Government
at house, as connected with the pardon granted to
Ruddy Row. In speaking most highly of the cha-
racter, of the integrity, and of the abilities of the
'Chief Justice of Madras, he was :confident that he
uttered the sentiments of ail those who were quali-
fied to judge of him. When the papers should be
laid on the table, it would be found that the condo&
of Sir T. Strange had been throughout must ex-
emplary. What had been the course pursued at
home ? A-report of the trial,had been received, cite-
faining details of the evidence ; this was accompaoi-
ed by a statement from the Judge, of the charge
which he had thought it his duty to give to the Jury,
and of his reasons fur 'thinking that in then verdict
the Jury had acted erroneously, welt this declara-
tion superadded, that he did not ;prat to theanercy,
but to the justice of his Majesty. Now, wing would
have been said, if Government, atter receiving such
a statement, had not advised his Majesty to extend
his Royal Mercy to the party concerned ? He could
not sit down without aaortly adverting to she ac
9usation ptelerred against him a few evenings ago
bythe Hon. Mover of the present question, namely,
that he had last Session urged the India Bill through
its various stages at a very late hour ot the night,
until the third teadiug, which was proposed at an
hour unusually early. 011 referring to those au-
Oolitic, which were in every one's possession, he
found that on the evening; when the Indil Bill was
read a third time, a previous disseussiun had taken
plaCe in the House on the subject of the Assessed
Taxes, and on the ;notion for the third reading,
the lion. Gentleman and the Noble Lord who sup-
%
ported his Statement, had participated in a debate
which terminated with a division. How far these
facts Were consistent with any intention, to carry
the Bill through Parliament by surprise, he lett for
the House to detente/le.
Lord A. HAMII.TuN declared that ,if ever there
was a subject which caked for minute and parti-
cular :et rte tee, it was the present. lie defended
the conduct of lets lion. Friend from the imputa-
tions which bad been thrown out view it.- His
Hon. Friend had been accused of prejudging Sir
G. Barlow—of prejudging a titan by whom so many
brave Officers had, been condemned, and punished,
without aexamination or a hearing ! Yet it WWI
for this perion that such extretata tenderness was
manifested by the Right Honourable Gentleman tit
the head of the Government of India. He would
not justify all the ads of the Madras Army ; but,
this he would say, that it was the intempereuce of
Sir G. Barlow which drove them to those:tient. By
law it was declared, that no servants of the :Cern-
pa ny were to be displaced bout communicating to
them the cause in writing, and without giVing them
an opportunity of being heard in their defence.—
This law had been diteetly violated. :.Even alter
the trials, the printing and publishing of ihern were .
, refused, on the simple declaration that such a ttleigt•
sure was not expedient ! He deprecated the
tieral inattention of the House and the Country to
subjects of this nature, and declared, that' when
he called to mind the various ads of tyranny and
oppression of which the British had been guilty
to the natives of India, he telt it his imperious,
duty.to bring questions of this description under
the cousideratiou of Parliameet, as frequently as
'possible.
Sir J. ANSTIIUTHER thought, that as this was
only a motion fur the production of papers, which
there was no intention to reluSe, it Would have been
batter to have deferred all comment until the pope's
were aatually on the table. If this were an im-
portaire general principle, it was particularly int-
'portant with respect to Indian arnirs, because it wart
a long time before papers on Lichen subjects could
be produced, and theiefure the impressions made in
the speech of the mover of such papers, must re-
mein for a long time without being wiped away.....
Such speeches also found their way to India, and
naturally excited in that country, great anxiety for
many months Were the ultimate decision of Pattie-
meta could be known there. Still, however, when
asse!iions were made on one side, it became neces-
sary to balance the inneession made by thotse asser-.
dolts by opposite assertions on the other. He rose
for the purpose of meeting by assertion, that which
wars only assertion. When did papers should be
proclked, he would take on bileSelt to prove, not
only that Sir George Barlow had hewn great ta-
lent, genius, and courage, in the sup-
pressien of the mutiny, but that no part of his
emitted during the whole of the military trans-
actions in India could be fably chatged by uny
candid man as the cause of that mutiny. As to
the civil transactions it would turn out that Sir G,
Ballow had little to do with them. It would turu
out that the conduct of the Chief Justice of Madras
(consistently with his conduct while holding the
saute situation in Nova Scotia), was as honourable to
himself as it Was adValitageOUS to the country. An
Hon. Gentleman bad taken it for granted, that the
Jurors on the trials alluded to hid been 'punished for
their verdict. This he positively contradicted. '
Nut a sneak person wile seem' thorie ttiitls as a ju-
tor was ever punished by Sir G. Barlow on that de-
count. Ile tweed, tiowever, it would not be cons
tended that because an isalividual had sat as a juror s

on those 'trials, that he was therefore ttl be indemni.
lied from the consequences of any a& which he
might afterwards 'think proper to comtnit. Far
from being punished, seine, of these jurors had been
'promoted. One of the Most confidential Servants
of the Government (the present- Secretary), bad
been one of those jurors. He was willing to admit
'that Sir G. Barlow had disMissedsome < fthe Officers
in the Company's Service without 'trial, in doing
'so, he had most wisely used the power entrusted to
him. If, in a y government, the individual
at the head of that government were not allowed
thiS summary authority, no army could possibly re.
Main . embodied for any length of time. What be
had stated, he :de‘ired disiintily to say. were only
assertions; but they were as, good as the assertions
on the other sick : and on the produlion of the pa-'
pees, be pledged himself •to ptove that they were
tats.

Sir H. 1110NTGOME/tY bore testimony, (as we
understood him) to the high character of General
M`Dowall, who, during a. service of 36 years in
India, had conduded himself With the most mark-
ed correEtness and propriety. He declared that the
measures adopted by Sir George Barlow to stippros
rebellion had inflamed it, and that the ultimate sup-
pression of that rebellion was attributable to the es-
pedations which the Madras army (of which the HOn.,
Gentleman spoke most highly) entertained of jus-
tice from Lord Minto, on his arrival at Madras, and
to the exertions of the two officers who had lately
reached this country. This was as clear to him, as
that the rebellion originated in the suspension of
Colonels. Bowles and Capper. He was willing to
adroit that sonic of the memorials, circulated as
corning from the Madras army, were of an impr(i-
per nature ; hut he deriied that any man of sense
had signed those particular memorials to which he
alluded.

Mr. GARNERLL asked tae Right Hon. Gentle-
Matt opposite a question, which, we believe rehied
to any communication that might have been made
to Colonel Bowle.i respecting his reinstatement ;
but we were not' able distinctly to collect the tenor
of the inquiry, or of Mr. Dundas's reply.
Mr. Amu, felt it to be his duty to defend the
Court of Directors from the charges which had
been preferred against thaan. Au Hon. Bart. had
accused the Director: of having expressed their de.
termination not to hear General M`Dowall in his
defence. So far; however, was this ham the tact,
that instead of the Directors evincing any indispo-
sition to hear Gen. M‘Dowall,. General M'Dowall
had declared, that n't would not reply to them.—
With respect to the Madras Army, it was on record
in Fort St. George, in 1807, that that Army .was in
an unsetiled state. An Hun. Baronet near him had
imputed the suppression of the rebellion to the ar-
rival of the Governor-General 'at Madras. Not so.
The rebellion terminated, 'because the Officera of
the Madras army, found that the Native Officers
were
.not inclined to suN»rt them, and because
they experienced in Sir G. Ballow, a tirmncits ofdt-
termitviso4m which they,bad not anticipated,
Sir T. ToRTON, Mr. CklaViY., and Lord A.
HAMILTON, eXplilibeti.
Mr. Ilowaaru lamented, that the Chairman of
the Court of Direetors should have charged men,
who froni North to South, from Bast to West, had
traversed the peninsula of India, and by their bravery
and perseverance, bad established the interests of
the East India Ciappany, with being factious. Was
the Hon. (;tautlematt aware of the. (Wiser of his
second observation c Could any man who knew any
thing of India, be so mischievous is to say that the
mutiny was quelled, not by ,the arrival of Lord
Minto at IVladras, but by the•nropean Officers not
having been able to prevail On the Native Officers
to concur with them in their obje& ? With respect
to the civil transactions, it appeared on the Lace of
the proceedings, that verditita of had been set
aside, and that Jurors had
,been punished. • These
were circumstances ‘a hich demanded the most se-
lions investigation.

Mr. Awr L explained.
• The motion was then agreed to, as were also a
number of oilier hiade by Mr. CftELVE?
for ditferent official doeumvnts on the sable subjects.
00 the motion at Sir J. MoiiTuomititY, copies of
the warrants by, authority, which jor-General
Gowdie ordered and approved Courts during
the time that hq held ,the Chid:Q/11111)HW of the
Army in Madras, were ordered to be laidbefore the
House.

PENITENTIARY 110 USES.
Sir S. ROMILLY, in conv,Nuence of the indispo-
sition of the Secretary of Stith) for the Hotne
part meut, 'postponed fort he present, his motion re-
lative to the Penitentiary ,Houses; with -the inten-
tion, however, of shortly submitting it to tha House.
He witdied to ask the Right Hon. L4entleman oppo-
site, whether any embarkation of convicts, and par-
ticularly otitemale convicts, tor New Suuth Wales
was soon to take place ?
The CHANCHLLOR of the EXCUEQVER profaned
himself unable to answer the question of his Hon.'
and Leal ned Ftiend. He believed, however,, that a
number Of convicts had been wititinis for some time,\
and lie supposed either that they had already set sail
or that they soon would set sail,
CAPITAL PUNISIIMENTS.
Sir S. ROMILLY tose.to make, his proinised 'no-
tion on this vubjed ; a subject whic.h, he observed,
Was by no means new to the HOLM, 'LIS he should
conclude by moving for leave to bring in a 13111 pre-
eisely sitnilur to that which he had introduced, and
which passed that House last Ses,iun. • Adverting
to the efforts which he had made 1,. amend the penal
law, he called the attention of the House to the
good etfeCts which had resulted from the repeal, in
'lOl4, ot the Ad Which waft pywately stealing trom
gie'persolt Thu3e.gol4 eIf,:CAS were, that a
greater number of ttials tor that offence h.td taken
place, and that of those tried, a tnneh larger plo-
portion had been contikted. A more deciiiiye Foot
of the beneficial effeet of the new law could not ,
be required. Indeed, the atitieirttions to wlik.h he
indulg.-d (ft the .tr,"jet,
Many hotly trod..r the (0 sptem,
+A, ould hate expellent:ea eo !piece imptioity tot
their petty etintus, had be,n mined iu the cow-
thelleetnetit 1,1 their Meer', us a greater num-
ber of crimes ot. more Mavitude .114.1 been Intrpi,y
itrevent"d. lie reforied ttte hi-oury ot the
Bith whLcit intri.dilti tutu the it:c

,
last Session. The first, which lepealed the 4°
that rendered it capital privately to steal to the rte
of five shillings in a shop, warehouse, &c' 111,.
the House of Commons. The next, which wen.
repeal the Mt that rendered it capital to steilleo
value of forty shillings, in a dthelling house, ‘r„4'lS
by the shiali majority of two; its a very. ditto':
As to the' third of those Bills, which related 1° i I
ingtoilie value of fort 'shillings on boar) "P;
navigable rivers, canals, isrc. untivoidsbieLCl%.
stances presented it. hom ever 'cotniag Una ~,
cussion. lie had inathrely considered the al;
since the last Session, and he was mote firallY,4
vinced.than ever of the 'solidtty of the grei'll'''.,,
which he had proceeded, and of the
.of the subjed. Still more deeply t.VaS he iol?',1,;
with a sense of the impeiativeness of the dotYwio
he conceived himself to be discharging, ll'nos
from light motives that lie prestamtd to,le.c°, frelf.';
an alteration in a matter so important as 144,-illi
nal Law of the Land. .He ha 4 always tigtetheo
it. was the duty of every man to use ibtarlo.;
which be possessed, for thepurpose of 3,',',. t')
the well-being of his fellow-creatures, a° "0.0
nit aware of any way in which lie coulf mo,
advance that well-being' so effeclaally, 35 bAI Iv' i
ing the course -Which he now par it!44l
Coke used to say, " that. he considered '"104
who. was successful in his profession, a' amiss"
obiagatiou to benefit society ;" and the v'.,)r,",io,
!hit great and learned rrntn proluceo, 311‘' -of
labour, in the high situation in which he vill',o' ft 4
were his mode of paying the social .debt. i„,
hitusell, hisrsuccess, and fir good tortLl4,lo4
grest inaimidi.-,
profession, had laid hiin Limier. a den! I° w a 2.
t:iety among which he lrVed ; mid the vt4lY 'lle]
l _ie intended to discharge that obligatioll, '4'66 wit
deavouring to ameliorate the law, and Iblallay: I
crease the security and happineos, of hi,s;c,„°,llisi6
was nut a little that would discourage a'''-' 'tot'
not to be discouraged by the considerstO ;o'l
had hitherto spent a great deal of tune on If' „,t,
ject without doing much good. flec,r,!,,t3iltir:,d'
not' persevere it the sense of ti,e poe":;:tiOt
e.ideslly against trim ; but onles, he w',„;lo4'‘,
the "P'oPritny of the proceeding be ""..,tioi-jv
were until his proposed measures were nea'd rjoi
a much larger ill ijority than that whiul) ll' v,:oli
ea his seccitil 1.1111,1 at Session. BY lihur,,jk.,
posed t hat WI,: it was illSinUaLUti akit De ""re',oo
du.ach store extensive than those viltio.*e iv 0'
;b
,etaliciel )d ittllon iienatteeltlit.ionToof tpbrisophoesicizlcilootr: I,IY f‘ifivolletr
'5,1
n f
Metisure but those writs he had eife:"l",,,i„e Id,
with the except ion lucked of one, of 14,•74-virl)o4
tu de, proceeding on s Minn- principles, ""ovi dti
8313:eilt:tusekliv:1:‘)e,irewiw'elr::%tsi..,Itlieeibislit:litstroinc°1doleitd'le:,otiluilatigttliiiser :111":13ti ij:o:o'4il 'l',
against. 'time 'addition of mersorns al i1t1'174.400i
ll\
Ve.folcultadi i.
_ _
_them by the
He conctived himself .as Le -,r,j,441'
c.onsiderable port ion, of the comtniniith ' 00°
it:l3oll6e to adopt measurci, which .were r°°:'4o4 I 1
strongest motivt.is 0111LIOCAull Ir.
msight a i ittert4Al°,airdbaeinBaTetnga tii.' utit'ijo%ib'Llilli;46lolo44lgl'''.
not be kill-tinge it a jud 4e. Should o.ll)'''';o4'','
suitor his it 1
ri—lit, lest be lsbould become 11141, 't.
thusltull:N))3e.r:ll3:l(.(lll.lvllll.l:l.l:ll.:l;lii.t(,lord..,lielitit'll:bori,e,e6)°ll(sll,..lli:eitller.tfitvii.ttltuf,i%loliss.olliceoeit*k)rdire:::)rtil'iliiilyiidlueiiili.6ve'lltlititill'au.l' li''o%ll)%:eiresel'fillslifictotlwulehpotres:ficeela:git):l;g:tlyli)iiiillt°l}l-rt°ll7l-'l)':'lvlrl,4llCillielcil',:''llt
!louse, ur stable, goods warts, of iliclt°-li
:7",[..%1'1a 'lee ki,°.t.icss. ol .iiu6c.i.eo. it' Of the E ice II sau r gu'itili'' cli
t)
rI
t‘mbbdt7ititC.rtr I:loll.l,ll:4l_(ll,:e'ocair'nenitaaciettaa)tieitdrshl.l,le!
ntenci'lioiteild,eril,lebtoe(llCii93l3:6,ll,4lltitittite'rd.l'ilaakeet:et)eiGoilatr:eelni.wl:rsdelitthayliv'tilitililealil(obouiiitivley,v:cure.f;'heeeg.iegigocelelwreilli'yoi'hhifrila.lte,ltuadllauel,ntcrie,st; :nitc.yattl'ioite.vtlielhtlihuliet'°)i°,:iiiitr,luslit'lae:'llr.gPeiciret
,c:e(ilei)lerts'av volturee 11,(3ifig.ttiit g
iliyvtilliiti'llvilei,beleelliasioi.v,)lB3(lneniieibilit
6,1t1 uejur't
pin. eiteettldeetsil rt:telelii..l°lliodollioi ',11;
j1:11: '
if
::),,Iti I I°liji,
ii iftierli'i, i 1 '
be: P.erfied credit for doing that winc:,;(,/IOY
C
►
of bringing
must .
and
shah the
a___.t...: hisicxa).
eti suggestionghtitoehopoedtrnhopoh9saubcirdgialulihbdocitrtnilueofeugarntoutisii: from
titOwtetyedihh,priei,sorethf::::::ltilmbniush::::l : eiti:lll3l.l I:Lir- )I'it'Cil,;ir it l'abegehjsi :Id 'tudiiitluiscirili dic'i6c''lsler.iji:i (,114;3ticl ):°l‘)Pl::ti
r:turzeinrccuenistance as could be stated 1° ilic 1111/41'
, !
n,
I.r
consequenceu di
tabned that
omfamioisdorberee Learnedlp)wruoiitalneisceiht:
sttalei,,osvenn:itltielib,e:ol:::el ;it:lt/brig:l.
trit'an turinerly, as many had escal'a puts)foc`
.wilen death
mrteuiltuotioaltliocwe ofco nivoideivi(i)(lol.l(lll;l:loo%is,Lcilj,l
uo that more Airosecutions Were colllll'iott Pr"
formerly. i
from
am, witnesses e forward 11,1°11,011)‘,..'3,,
and
such
coaffneinders,
tbct(nirt:ro!au:entrt;:rehdfilliell.toa'blerlrecidi'lltilltstigl:i‘id'v,:eeldirsr,asetibCll:9o:lll:lrnietille.i knows''l.'...llel.dat;'ilsa9llltdi3FilCe::l°:ll;ll:ll;ll;lf:ll.:
pot bel'a svitlia
tuna:
Ince increase of pros. cotions; wild(' 3 IP'
)41 it rendered conviction LOW e'ri:HYst. it ''°'i
Exchequer) did DPI ire ou
lie _would. not th•cide either one ‘''''Y'4)r ‘,l o'l
but
_he contended that 'the lionourahle 111,1, ,;%fe, Pc,
...-ientlefil:th, to taking this es 0 niust tioilesi tlic
11) favOur of the efficacy of his tneastire' Nell',l
qlnrikielt not wholly tree tivm prvitilitr,i;oll I° ci
ye. et to the Balls he could have no ouic-I,,rati'f,,,
ru,',,tng again brought. in, and agi" ell, Wif '"1
I:. ffouse ; -but in giving his arse iigtit, to;
u.r"111)1 in, it was his wish Oat 1)1f: tbeori
rriludgvd EIS pirtlging iIitIVICII 10 $Ol-ii/(1(1 ine °
',' "tsar his Lelitiird Friend bad. aiiLd "0,, ‘)4,'e
T1"1" \vlPolt had )eei.i' made to his sile041";1, co' '
''''''"'i 4 hat be ii .tt something Itirlbt"r,`,oiticqi
i'''"'", ite t Inc Cliincetfor of ti'e °1:5,0 writcv
/' p:'.;4,1 VAlty to baling Made