The Sun.
London, England, 1818-08-13 00:00:00

witness's opinion. The otl, er itad lwttt. The notes were new
in the saute state in which taws were found. (The marks
were very faint.)
Bellialnin Kean being- ea!led back stated, that he thooght
there were twirls of hlaad ou both, but the marks were now
fainter titan they then were. The notes had been two years
in circulation.
.Sohn Gardener was on the Coroner's Jury, and stated that
Ile observed on one of the notes' the marks of blood, when
they were Best prodtwed.
Thomas Simpsim Allathorp is a warehauseman, Gate-street,
Lincoln's Inn, Lomlon. He paid the' two notes to Mr.
thentiel on the 4th 'of November. He knew the twit notes
taking tht m of a Mrs. Baker,ewhose name he had put on
hem. Ile pia the notes which he had received from Mrs.
Balser, on the 3d of November, among his other notes, and
paid two to Mr. Chennel, tin the 4111 of November.
Coombes was waiter in November last at the Angel
Godahning. He remembered the evening of the discovery
oft he murder : Chennel was at t heir house ou that evening with
Sarah Hurst. He observed Sarah Hurst and Chaleraft whisper-
ing together. He heard nothing hut these words said by Sarah
Hurst, " Hold your tougee, Chalcraft, I want to hear no
more of it." This ended the whispering. He sew Chennel in
August last, and said to him, " Charles, when your business
is et-ranged yon will go and live with your father." Chennel
answered, he would go home to eat and drink, but not to
sleep, hccallse the housekeeper would know at what hour he
came home. He hoped saute looming, when he gut Ile, lie
should find her with her throat cat; and if he met the meu
h
coining out of the door whit,ad dune the murder, he would
net tell of it though be were to be hanged for it himself ; and
that if he limed them bath sir, he would not be the least
sorry; nor even if hr committed the murder himself should
be think he had committed any sin.
James- Ayles is a wheelwright at Godalming. He remem-
bered Chalcraft coming to his shop in November last. Wit-
ness asked him, " %What does Great George (meaning Chen-
nel) do now?" Prisoner answered. " Il—ii me, I do not
know what he does. He parson letting off fire works at the
Richmond Arms. There will be a bigger blow up in God:st-
illing than ever was known. You will soon hear of it."
Edward Mandeville keeps the Three Lions public-house at
Godahning. (Airline' was there uu Sunday before the mur-
der. He had some liquor, but did not pay for it, and said he
would 'come allot pay again.
W. Johnstone is a drayman in Godalming. He went to
Hasscombe with his dray on the Monday before the discovery
of the murders. George Chennel, the prisoner, went with
wit !less. Hr put up his horses there. Chennel asked
him to pay a pot of beer for him a. he had only ed. in his
pocket, and had left his money at home. They had beer and
tobacco. When they had gone out, Chennel said to the land-
lord Miles, I have no [floury, but I will make it tip to you
another time. 'Furey returned to Godalnong, and arrived at
seven o'clock : witness saw no more lit him that night ; wit-
ness eaw,Clia:eratt iu the evening ot Tuesday (that of the mur-
der), who said that he had left his toaster at home at halt-past
eight o'clock' as near as be could tell, unhuttoning the
knees of his breeches to go to bed. The deceased said, " Bet,
I will go to htd," and site said, " I will stay up fur George,
who comes to supper." Nothing more passed.
Lliaalreth Stillwell is the wife at Stillwell, in whose house
Chennel lodged. She remembered the morning of the mur-
der. She did not see Chennel ou Monday. She heard hint
go out on Monday morning at ten o'clock, and did not re-
turn, that day. He came home after midnight on Monday, be-
tween twelve and one : she left the door open for him. On
Saturday previous, the prisoner owed her five weeks' rent. He
theft promised to pay her on Monday. Witness had lent hint
lOs. before, and lent him some mote on the Saturday night to
buy his wife some brandy. He asked 75., and witness lent
him ssa and he promised to return the whole on Monday.
John Earl, a gardener, was Mr. Chermers shop on Mon-
day evening, where he saw young Channel. He saw chat-
craft in the 'luau-hall on Tuesday, when the examination
was going on. Witness said to hits. " Well, Chalcraft,
how do they get on now ?" Witness asked him if they had
found any thing out ? He said, he did not know much about
it, lie asked if they had got Chennel to the market-room.
Prisoner answered, yes. Witness asked if Chennel had not
a hand iii it. Witness said thus—" I saw haw down the pas-
sage last night ; he was like a wild man then." The pri-
soner Chalcraft then trembled very much, and said it wise a
party concert). Witness SAW Chennel in the shop on Mon-
day. He looked very wild.
llatinals Chiller lives at Godahning in the same passage in
whica Chalcraft lived. She remembered seeing the prisoner
ter out a quarter before right on the Monday night of the
murder. ‘Vittiess followed hint down the passage, arid then
returned. She went afterwards to Mr. Chenner, and bought
some birds'-seed. The clock struck eight as she was nonfat-
ha; from Mr. Clienuers. She saw Chalcraft as she was re-
turoing at the end of Mr. Chennel's passage. She saw him
conic home about hail-past nine, as she was shutting her win-
dows. She sass' hint go into his house, anti heard ban shut
the door. She heat d him likewise go up stairs.
Charles Woods, on the evening of Moaday, was in the street
near Mr. Chenners house. Saws' two persons going down Mr.
Chenuel's passage dre-sed in round frocks. They were near
the door ut tile kitchen. This WAS ;khalif- half-MIA Sereli.
Thoee persona were conversing together. Witnesswentaway,
and returning about ten minutes afterwards, saw them
still in deep conversation. He went sway and returned a
third time, when he Lionel them in the same position. There
was a light it) a lather's shop opposite i hat CaSI a reflection down
the paseage. Witness could not see who the persons were,
and could not swear positively to there. Fie kuew the lA-
sunere very well, and believed those persons to be them. The
light in the Jiop tippasite gave him a slight view of them,
but he ilid not observe their hires. He knew them by their
figures.
William Stillwell lives in Godalanng, and remembered the
circumstances of Mr. Chennel's death. lie sew Chalcraft ou
Monday 'about half-past st ven, turning into his own
passage. Witness went tip the town, and returned in ahont
an buur and a halt. About 4u yards from Mr. Cheaners he
met Chalcraft near the Great George Arms, going towards
(Amulet's house. He met Sarah Hurst about I 4 or 15 yards
behind h itu, going the same way, but slower I ban the psi enter.
James 1 Leeps the Richmond Anus at Godal ming,. He
knows the prisoner George Chennel, who was at his house on
Monday, the 10th of November. He came at 7 o'clock and
called for a pint of beer, then a peenyworth of tobacco, mid
then another pint of beer- He paid foralie beer, winch came
to bid. He then went away. It was about ct o'clock, leasing
his pipe un the table where it lay. There were several per-
sons tn the house, but none in his company. A person of
the name of Fisher sat by his side. Fisher and the prisoner
went away together. About a quarter before 10 he returned
quite alone. lie them called for a pint of beer, own a
pennyworth of tobacco. Witness brought some clean pipes.
Prisoner did not think the other pipe could be still lighted,
'as be was Uhiellt three-quarters of an hour. He afterwards
called for a glass of brandy and scaler—then a second—and
then a third, which wits' diank between hint and the land-
lord. He then said, we shall want some beer for a cooler,
and ordered a pot. Then they had another put. Chennel
left his house about half past eleven. The reckoning was
2s. 3d. Prisoner Ved.s it) the habit of frequenting his house.
Chennel was in witness's house on the Friday preceding,when
lie said he wished his father's huusekeeper were dead, arid if
he saw any one tourdei her he would not tell of it. lie had
heard prisoner frequently wish the housekeeper dead.
George. Wallace was at the Richmond Arms on Monday the
10th of November, and saw there George Chennel, who left
the inn aliout In minutes after 9, it) company with Fisher,
and returned a quarter before JO alone.
Charles Breech is a shoemaker, and used to work for the
late Mr. Chennel. Was at the Richmond Arms on the Monday
of the murder. Witness was there about six. Sarah Hurst
was there with her husband ; they went away about 7 o'clock.
Chennel came in between 7 and 8, eating a piece of bread
and mutton. He said, his father and he had had some word
about buying some ewe mutton from butcher Hart; witness
left the prisoner there. Neat morning witness heard of the
murder. He talked of the murder to Chalcraft in Mr.
Cheirners shop. He observed Chalcraft during the conver-
sation trensble very much ; the workshop where they were
was up stairs ; and Chalcraft, attempting to go down the lad-
der, fell whets half way dowta
Charles Fisher is a hursekeeper in Godahning; was in the
Itichnetail Artus,•oo the lOth of November, he SW Chennel
there. About ten minutes past nine o'clock, the witness left
the house, and the prisoner said he would go with him. They
parted about ten yards after they left the house. Chennel
appeared then to go down the town to his house, to look
alter a girl, as he said.
William Cooper is hostler at the Red Lion, opposite the
Richmond Arms down the town. He remembered standing
at the door about a quarter past nine, and remembered Fisher
bidding good night. Witness heard something over the way,
turned his lantern, and saw Chalcraft and Chennel a hay
minutes after he saw Fisher, The prisoners were standing
thin face to face. 'Winless saw them go down towards
(Ileum:Lis. They had both smock-frocks. Witness contiou-
ed there about ten minutes, but saw nobody returning. He
must have seen them if they had.
William Cotby lives at Godalming,. On the night before
he heart: of Mr. Chennel's death he went out of the Red Lion
and talked with GottPees the last witness. Ile 'then saw
Chennel and Chiller:sit stateling together. He cofiversed with
Cooper about them. He knew them at the, time. He went
in lei::: ic4 talki"6, and staid about Lire minutes. He

then went to Fry's, the stocliinc,,-rnAer, opposite the Riebmond
Arms. tie stopped there for some time, and in going down
the town he passed Mr. Chetincl's. When near Mt. Chewier s
house lit heard a very sharp scream, apparently of a woman.
pe thought the scream cause from Chennel's passage. Wit-
Stess walhen shout eight or ten paces, and saw a woman, who
was apparently lookitig for something, and then he percrived
thennel standing right in front of the passage, in the centre
of it. Chennel appeared to have come up the passage, as he
did not set,hini till then. The prisoner was speaking to the
woman. After the scream, he heprd a great fall„, Witness
then went to Mrs. kVood's, in Bridge street, and slopped
there tn- initiates. In passing to Nlrs. Wood's he went through
Chalcraft's passage. In coining hack wiLuess met Chalcraft
going home between Mr. Cheonel's and his own house. Wit-
ness wished Chaleraft good night, which salutation prisoner
exchanged. When he went into Chalcraft's passage he saw
Sarah Lambert.

Mary Morley is the wife of James Morley, at Godahning,.
O'n the Monday night, when Mr. Chennel was onu•dered, she
passed Mr. Channel's passage a quarter past ❑ine, going tin•
beer, and saw Chalcraft and Chennel just within the passage.
Chalcraft looked out just ss she passed. She was sure of his
person, She saw Chennel; she knew him before likewise,
and was sure of hint.

Sarah Lambert deposed, that she saw Coifley pass about
half-past nine, when Chalcraft came home. -
Elizabeth Moorey deposed, that on Monday night, previous
to the murder, just opposite butcher Andrews', -about a tpusr -
ter before ten, Chermel passed her in haste, close enough to
touch her elbow. He was going towards the ttiebniqnd Arms
from the direction of his father's house. She k ,ew Chetind
before, and had no doubt that the person she saw was the pri-
soner. She did not see his face.

James Pattock is a tithing-man at Godalming. He had the
two prisoners in custody. He recollected the W eduesday
evening after the Coroner's Inquest. and saw Unlue', :vim
said, that on Monday he went to his father's and took stone
mutton, and went to the Richomod Arms, where he stopped,
drank and smoked, stud left about 9 o'clock, intending to go
to see Mrs. Clarke, the farther end of Goda!ming: but that
when he got to the slaughter-house of Mr. Andrews, be
thought she must be gone to bed, and retorued in about foer
or five minute at most, and found the pipe which he left still
lighted. Chalcralt looked at Chennel in the evening, and
said, where did you see me last ? Chennel answered he saw
him in some field at plough on Friday or Saturday last.—
Chalcraft said you saw nie there, and found fault with me
about the horses. I complained that you hail taken too much
authority upon you, as I was not your servant.
John Perry proved the distance as laid down in the plan
before the Court. Front the Richmond Arms to Mr. Chen-
tiers house, the distasee is 313 yards. The width of the
street from the baker's shop to Mr. Chennel's passage is 28
feet. The slaughter-house lies from Chennel's 113 yards.
Sarah Hurst appeared deeply affected, and coula scarcely
stand. She lived in Godalming, and knew the prisoners;
saw Chalcraft at five in the evening of Monday, the loth of
November. He asked if she should be down town that even-
ing, and she answered she did nut know if she should. He
said he wished she would, giving no reason for his wish.—
Slie told him she would come down if he wanted her.—
Nothing more then passed. She saw him again a little
after nine over against Mr. Parson's, or, near as she could
tell, a few doors below Mr. Chennel's. Ile was then alone.
She asked what he wanted. He answered, that he wanted
her to stand by Mr. Chennel's door to watch. Nothing
more then passed. He went to Mr. Chenuel's house, and
witness walked in front of the door-way backward and
forward. She remained there souse time, but could not
• tell how long. She saw George Chennel going in too when
Chalcraft went. After Chalcraft came out, she heard a
screech from within doors. Chalcraft said, when he came
out, "Is that you, Hurst ?" and she said, " Yes." She
asked him what they had been doing ? He answered, we
have done for them both. Witness saw some blood on 'his
round frock sleeves, by the light of two candles in the oppo-
site window. Witness asked how it came there, to which he
answered, it was the blood from them two. Chennel came
up while they were talking from the passage, and asked who
Chalcraft was talking to. He said he was talking to Hurst.-
One or two persons passed at this time. They parted—Chal-
craft went down the town, and Chennel went up.- Witness
likewise went up. The next night she was in company with
Chalcraft, and he offered 41. to keep it secret at a nubile-
She told him she would not have it, as she did not
want the money. He spoke in whispers. This happened in
the Angel Inn. She told him at last to hold his tongue, she
did not want to hear any more of it. She saw him on Wed-
nesday evening coining from Mr. Wood's house, in the cus-
tody of Pattock. She asked hint how he got on. He said,
" All well, Sarah, at present."
Cross-examined by the Cciatmoal SERJEANT.=a-She said that
her husband was at Guildford. She had not sren'ttini since
April. She had been in gaol since. She bad been taken up
in March, and been its pris at ever since. She and her hus-
band were living at Godalming at this time. It was dark
about five o'clock, on the 10th of February. She never made
an improper apl.ointnient except once. fQ. What was there
in this once I—A. I have dune a great deal of harm by it.]
(The witness here could scarcely answer, being overpowered
by her feeling.) Her husband was to have met Chalcraft at
six. She set off from her husband's at nine o'clock; her has-
hand had left her about six o'clock. (The Common Serjeant
was proceeding to question the witness about her husband,
when be was stopt by the Court, as what she might say might
criminate him. It was then mentioned on the part of the
Counsel for the defence, and admitted by the Counsel fur the
prosecution, that Thomas Hurst was not her husband, he
being convicted of bigamy at these Assizes for marrying her
as his second wife. Any thing site might say, theretore had
no reference to her husband.)
After snide pause, time examination went on. Then you
knew of the murder, and gave no intimation of it till March ?
—I did nut. Did yen not charge others with this horrid mur-
der Yes I did, and lam sorry fur it. Who did you first
charge I—l cannot recollect his name. You were sworn then,
and chargetl that person nit oath, without recollecting his
name ?--Nes. Who was the second person whom you charg-
ed 1-1 never mentioned the ;tame, but said another person
was concerned; that other ',eosin) was meant to he myself.
tVere you concerned then ?—Yes, too, for I watched..' Did
you not charge another person still ?—Yes. Who was that?—
Thomas Hurst. Was that the person with whom you were
iiviU~ :is your hushatol ?—Yes. Was that alter you accused,
these two men ?—Yes. What share-lid you say-Thomas Htirst
took in the murder?-1 said, he went down there Was br
taken up ?—No, Sir, he was not. This Thomas Hurst was
the person whom you called your husband ?—Yes. What you '
said about him, was it false ?—Yes.
Ite-examitted by Mr. GURNEY.—Witness said, that site
charged those who were not guilty before Mr. Woods. She
named no person to Lord Middleton but Chennel and Chal-
craft. She was taken into custody in consequence of the de-
claration which she voluntarily made.—Did you not state' to
Mr. Smallpiece, the Under-sheriff, at Kingston, that h man
of the name of Scooly, who was once a iervaut of Mr. Chen-
tiers, was concerned I—Yes.
Mr. GURNEY said he was bound to declare, that there was
no foundation for this charge, as had been lappet on inquiry.
The Court asked, was there any truth in this ?—No ; she
was confused, and began to mention the name without any
foundation. Had any body suggested this ?—No; it was tilt
out of toy own head. What induced you to du this I—She
could not teil nobody suggested it to her. The witness
nearly fainted away io Court, and was obliged to be support-.
ed and to have smelling-bottles applied.
Mr. Smallpieee, the Under Sheriff, was then called and
examined. He said the witness was in a perturbed state of
mind at Kingston. He, went to see her in gaol, where she
mentioned what she had now-stated. She was then very wild
in her manner and confused in her ideas. She had been sub-
ject to fits which might have hurt her intellects. She- was
not then so collected as she was to- day. He wrote an account
of what she said to Lord Middleton, and as far as lie re-col-
lected, stated at the same time that her declarations were nut
to be relied on.
The Keeper of the House of Correction, at Kingston, and
Mr. Woods, an attorney at Godalthing, deposed to the same
effect.
The evidence fur the prosecution here closed, and the pri-
soners were asked what they had to say in their own defence.
Chennel gave an .account of the transactions of Monday,
which lie partly read from a paper. The account did not
vary from what appeared in the evidence and his previous
statement. He persisted in saying that be used the same
pipe when he returned to the inn as he had used before he
left it. He went through the transactions of the night at
the Richmond Arms, nearly as given by the master of that
house. He mentioned a geoid deal of irrelevant tualter about
his conduct on Tuesday morning, which it is unnecessary to
repeat,

iaalcraft, when asked what he had to say, said he would
state his defence if the Jury would give attention. fie like-
wise gave an account of his conduct on Alunday, stating what
he did at the different hours, but brought in many things
that had no reference to his exculpation. He delivered- this
story, introducing the most minute circumstances, and the
most trifling dialogues, without the least stop or embarrass-
ment, in a firm voice, and with great composure of manner.
The only symptom of anxiety-or agitation that appeared was
a quivering in his lips which ite. (UMW it [Accessary to wet

frequently with AclOri"
his tongue. He concluded by "e
" what have said is true, So help me God." hpro
Mr. ANnaLws then called witnesses in behalf of Co-ti, A
James therniel deposed, that he resides iu
Was a brother of the deceased. tic received a letter„ le"
v,niber, from Mrs. •Mary Gill her sister, which he g3lller
drhvered to Mr. (Alcune', of Godalming, by his son. (et?
ceived no messa4e from Mr. ( n. Alcor, on his let"r'oe
through his son. Tbis examination as inadmissa
drops. Of'
Coles ' wae".., ibt

ChenJamnesel was ,ole
111,irelis rm
en, e
A. Sawmbered the Monday
theprisoner, sd
ainth
•
shop about e4.;ht o'clock al. night. Ile went. up the P 00
of his father's house towards the street. ‘Vitriess snw
more of him that night. Witness went to him next de
bar
iu , and found him in bed, and told bhp what re said,
penal at hi; father's house. When he beard
" Lord have mercy upon us, is lie quite dead. iihtt
dressed himself in the clothes he had on the previutl'alitbil
and witness saw no stain of blood on them. T 163 was
defence of Chenoel.
tediatell

Citalcraft said, he bad two witnesses,who were
called. Their testimony was of no consequence. eed'
The Judge (Mr. Sergeant LeNs) then Prov-
ed to address the Jury, and sum op the evidetti,4
He was not aware that he could do any 1h
11,01 e in thia important case ihau merely ree3P';a,„t.
late the different accounts given by the differe
witnesses of the conduct of the prisoners d'itin(l,s
the hours between S and 11 on Monday, the I'j
of November. It they could rely on any par: -f
Sarah Hurst's evidence, the decision of the Jor'a
would be short and infallible. The cond"sija,
would he inevitable, it her word could be troste"
but her conduct did not tend to establish oar ate°
aft : according to her oxn CCollllr► WaS
pointed to watch While the mord, r was commit
tin •, and was therefore a nail y in the not (tel.;
she had charged ot het s with the crime, and it 4,•`::t
difficult to say whether her charge was the "'to-
ol: malignhy, or the mere wandering or deinivo
of her mind. ‘Vhatever was the cau,e, 5,10
dente was proportionally affected by it. Del'r'l;44
or confusion Of mind might apply to her oljet
as regarded ScoolY. 13 it this racist, did not
aptt
to what she said of her husband, when she Inalig;
nattily and deliberately accused him of actiotk.bc
she had done, in assisting the 'murderers
must have done so either to get rid of her bJoi
band, or some other hateful purpose, not °kyr
conjectured ; and then the Jury were to eons. ha
how far a person of such a character was t: ,ce
listened to. He was afraid that her tviuete)l
must be laid aside, and that the Jars/ twist r out
on the other evidence alone. The evidence
eog
which the Juty were to form their jildgtai dr
included the minute points of time, of
lion, of conduct, of declaration, and Wel,
The declarationi of Chennel's hatred
portant ; but-the Jut y were to consider 0"d .01
expressions lie used with
,regard to his father ;re,
his housekeeper, coarse and violent as they wi;ss
extended over a long course of time (as Inuc ere
a year) before the fatal deed ; and the Jury (Cl'‘
to judge, whether they were the infatuation of "or
minality, unconsciously avoWitig its designs 5.
loose idle words, that had no definite me 31112.,
anti were never intended to avow any pures‘'dif
He thought that theS'e expressions could l're
be taken to convey what they meant ; andl,l)%l'ril
were
they were not to be forgotten,as evincing a gen oca
disposition to evil, and rendering what Pile, al
more probable, they were not to be relied °-i s 9
declaring the intention of murder, which "47 loaf
in his senses, who meant to commit the erie,
would previously declare. The Learned. 4-
then went over the different parts of the 0'1'100:
and shewed its bearing on the 'guilt or inP°Cl.Oll,
of the prisoners with great penetration, 'liseioldgi
nation, and impartiality. The Learne",
Concluded an address to the Jury of Ora eoltic
and three quarters, about ten minutes beiclE''
o'clock. verdict
The Jury almost immediately returned awe obi
of Guilty against both the prisoner). '
nte at
served very little change in the apPcitilit vibe°
countenance either of Chalcratt or Cbe"tle"
the verdict was pronounced. .0 '
The Learned Judge then proceeded to
awful sentence of the lave, apparentlY
fected. He told the prisoners that they after
found guilty by a Jury of their countrymen, titan
the Most mature and patient investiga(oo 104
case ; trod he Might now meotion whit ii,ot
studiously abstained from hinting before, f
thought the conclusion they had come t° the
ine
oa
one to which any reasonable limo could c co' ,
-the evidence against them. After the 101 Cl"
ruination into, which the Court had air"' !
tered, he felt that he could not much longera 00C;
a 'demand on their attention, but he
p lit
omit stating to the prisoners the titre":eo..i
-whichi4hey stood with regard to the 0W95.
Tlite one of them stood in the relation of 11.00,05 c
relatilin whiCh should always create the' ter'
4yeavnetr,e;iyche,ic. sandh love;o u 1, twha.ey s(!3:
spect., Murder committed in these relatioo 'e
be coin i
iA
icrireelyltdMit aggravation, but t s,„ncc
their case had been. aggravated by cirotinliad
one brit
of alttioit uilexamplei atrocity. The r
'I is faibe
lifted tip his-hand not only. against ) 0,00
that father aged and feeble;
ctohmermistimti l(iiauttyoftisno..dotrie4l
a master whom he himself haa,dindletnhoealclearter'ecksirlel;rl
and benevolent. If they had not Yet illot
their minds by repentance to supplicate
„010 V
fNev‘lviorliotuhresy o
that yffeetwrieetml,atihneeyd sfhoortiktlhaeocipitoiesi::
without uselessly denying their Olt, 8 calve
your to place their Souls in a state (0 Ile fle e
don in another world for a deed like thon•ce of tbo
now only, to pronounce the a Willi sentence to 0.,
law, whiCh teas—that they be taken 11'01c1 frid:7o
prison from whence they came, and
the
next carried to the place of execution, Lbodies.os,
hung ,by the neck till dead, and their, and (11,0
terwards to be given to be anatomise.",eiog I'l
sected according to the statute. Thisrcuy on 1141
sentence of the law, the Lord have me
ft
souls. Ch°l,,ci
The prisoners were then led °S."); the "I'st,
protesting that he was "as innocent trite de
unborn," and Channel saying twtirl:lsdtoir'irtegillcr,
ter seems a person about 40 ; is a t scill,teof
man, rather inclined to be corpoiciVered up(
outline of a good face, apparently
and
habits. dull
He was dby the effressedects of
in a indolblack),ence a:ocke oe •
biefy•
a striped waistcoat, and a black necketethe °Tier
displayed, on his entrance into Coll' pot orrir6.l.
indifference to his si'uation, oectr„clo
to be much touched by any thing t „booc
The prisoner Chalcratt appeared id 35ciesSlY
with a coloured handkerchief tied °:0111Ce
his pea he had all the rustic aPP$