The Sun.
London, England, 1811-01-25 00:00:00

JAI 1) Eta, 41, _P ILL lAN EN .

HOUSE OF PEERS.
THURSDAY, JANUARY 24.

The LORD CUANCELLOR took his seat on the
Wciolgack abinit tour, o'clock. The attendance, of
peer 4 wag not numeroos.

Mr. Parkhurst prrsented at the Bar the Sixth Re-
port of the Carnat►c Commiss►oners, .which was or-
dered to lie on the ►able.
..

KEG I- 14C,Y BI
The Elul of LlvluPooL moved tne Second Read-
ing of 111iFi Bill.
Lard GRANTid expressed' big surprise that a
measure, Of ,such great and 'perilous importance
sineuki be suffered, in perfect silence, to go to a
0,0 d reading; but perhaps th6re was some agree-
Ment hal Ifecti

The Eiirl or LivErtroot. said, there was certainly
an uiadtrst.►ndttg itatotig Noble Lords, thdt ihe
e,:ssioo- at ;the lieh6l.llC Simuld Like pldce in the
Cotninti tee.

Lard OttANTLEY observed, that. his rea,ion for. in-.
trrpilsing new, was Incroly Jo state. that his senti-
ments Of the me.isttie w, inn h, that he should
bhortly,litit strongly, protest aL;;liost the 13111.

tial w~►3,tl►en road A secouJ atid on the
nuition.,ot the Noble Secettary of State, cr,ntn►itted
for

tt►A l I.S.
Aakivio-1 Dublin. 4 W.tterlord Dti z—l Cadiz, t Lib-
' bon, I Waterford, '

I 1,, t'

St )I.IIM QUIS Oleikt FALSUN AUI,KAI?

L D O/v,

FRIDAY, JANUARY 25, 1811.

Witictsor Castle, Jan. 25, dip.

" His MAJP.STY cdntinues in the salllC state in
'w•iicli he waslesterdity..
•

". FT. HAt.voup.
i" fluntottnm.
" IL WILLIv."

• The Chronic/e has fieqtieritly Complained
that aisrespeetful hioz:tr;re has been used against the
`Royal Dukes; and that inSi 'wallow; have
been thrown out against tilt,,: who hate wished 'to
oce the PrinC# Regent wiiiu .Restrictions; and
yet it constantly indulges in the mu disrespeetfUl
language net the most illiberal insinuations egaitist
nil those who are adverse to the party it supports.
'We do not say that any improper conduct on the
cue side is a justification, °inn excuse for it on the
;other, but it would at least be decent .forthe Clow.
'niek to abstain from a yraciif e.which jt represents
-as being so unpardonable in others. How often
has the Paper to which we are alluding insinuated,
Or'rather asserted, that those Noblemen and Gentle-
,
. men who, since the commencement of the discus-
siona-upun the Regency, Itr“ e voted with Ministers,
have been actuated merely by motives of personal
interest, that their object has been not' to ma-
`nifest their fidelity to their. Sovereign, and their.
wise:l:went to the best interests of their country,
such an important crisis, but merely to.Secore
their places ;' and that -on the other,side, every one
is actuated by the most pyre and patriotic Motives;
the desire of, place, emolurnet4, and rank, has no
frecrupon their minds ; itt a word, l,
' that persona
'considerations have no weight with.t hem ! ! We ask
the Morning ChrOnicle whether those who use such
Language, and throw out such insinuations, can with
any propriety complain of illit)eral treatment from
others. This practice of throwing out unfounded
insinuation's against the motives of public men,
'merely to answer the temporary purposes of a party,
is 'both' wicked and foolish; wicked, because it is
caleulated to infuse into the public mind a ground-
less s'uspielon of those who, from their education,
talents, and situation, are Best (11111111 kt to nave the'
nation ; and .foolish, because if the charge applies.
t .all, it applies equally to both parties t if the one
is influenced by tin wish of retaining power,, the
other is actuated by the hope 'of acquiring it ;
Ruch as VL.T have heline observed, as there are always
niore expeattutt than places, this species of charge
must apply with greater ' force, in that point of
rr it. aping those who arc seeking .W office,
than against those who are 'endeavouring' to re-.
tali) it, We have been led to 'those obServatiops
from an article which this morning appeared in the
Yager' alluded to, upon the, subjet.t of the jour-
ney ,of the Loan Casitqcou.on to Windsor, for
tm, purpose, as, it was. reported, of being admit-

ed into his MAJIti;TY'S presence. The Par.igraph
does not, indeed, assert that Lord arioN would,
.in the discharge of tine important duties of ins high
ortice, betray his trust to his King and Country, but
jr does contain a spedies 'of insinuation which is highly
tocitTent when thrown out against a Nobleman
ebaraaer, both .in public and in private life,
ah imblentished With what view is it that a story
told Of What the LORD CHANCELLOR did in
-ii-Ourittnission'of L9nacy some yeais ago I Does