Star.
London, England, 1830-07-16 00:00:00

LONDON.
FRIDAY,JULY 16.

This day despatches were received at the Colonial
Office from his Excellency Sir CHARLES BACOT, OUT
Ambassador at the Hague.

Despatches were also received at the Colonial Officel
from Barbadoes, dated the 28th of May; and from St.
Thomas's, dated the 18th of June.

The columns of our Paper this day are occupied by the
melancholy details of the occurrence which took place
yesterday at Windsor; and our Readers will find that we
have given a relation of the scene, containing every au-
thentic particular.

As we took occasion yesterday to make those remarks
on our late MONARCH'S character, which were naturally
suggested by the solemn circumstances of the day, we
shall not again recur to the subject at much length. All
that we have reflected, or heard since we wrote those re-
marks, has not induced us to regret one word which we
then said ; but, on the contrary, to confirm us in their
propriety. We consider that in what we have ex-
pressed, that we expressed no more than whet is re
quired of us, by the stern performance of duty.
We know there are not wanting others, who view their
line of duty on the subject very differently. We. envy
not the sternness of their decision, and congratulate our-
selves that our views of duty so fortunately correspond
with what is consonant to our feelings.

The following is an extract of a letter dated Wednes-
day evening :—" Paris is filled with reports respecting
misunderstandings between the Governments of France
and England, with regard to Algiers. It is, however,
stated here positively by persons who must know, that
no note has been presented to the French Government by
the British Ambassador. No alarm is felt with regard
to the intentions of either party ; but some is felt with
respect to the manner in which the papers have taken the
matter up. The Minister for the United States did not
attend at the Te Deuns, in consequence of the close con-
nection existing between his Government and the Dey
of Algiers."

In a Paris paper it is said—" It appears that Lord
STUART DE ROTHSAY, who had received instructions
beforehand on the subject, has delivered a diplomatic
note to the French Government, in which he declares
that England did not oppose the expedition against
Algiers ; being fully aware that France only intended to
obtain satisfaction for an insult; but that in case she
should have conceived a design of a more serious nature,
the British Government would expect some further ex-
planation on the subject. It is even asserted that the
British Ambassador has declared that his Government
would oppose any establishment on the coast of Africa;
and that he has required a decisive answer in the course
of ten days." •

The Contre Revolution, a ministerial Paris Paper,
just arrived, has published the following facts:—" It is
said that the Cabinets of France and England have just
forwarded to each other diplomatic notes of the highest
importance, of which we are enabled to give the sub-
stance. The English Cabinet has reminded the
Cabinet of the Tuilleries, that when the French
negotiation, relative to the war of Algiers, took
place, France answered that she bad no other
intention than to chastise the insolence of the
DEY— giving to understand that she should not send
more than 10,000 men ; that, at a later period, she an-
nounced that she found herself obliged to employ
20,000 men, to ensure the success of the expedition ; and
finally, without any further notice, the French Government

sent out a very numerous army ; that now, the DEY has
not only been chastised proportionably to the offence, but
that his possessions hairs fallen into the hands of the French,
it becomes necessary to decide immediately on the result
of the conquest, the possession of which by France has
not, beem provided for in the present treaty, and would be
highly injurious to the interests of Great Britain; a circum-
stance which could not pillow the English Cabinet to tolerate
the eatabli6liment of a Prowl) colony on the coast of Africa,
The French Ministry have answered to this official com-
satmieation, that the eakedition to Algiers was under-