The Sun.
London, England, 1845-07-09 00:00:00

20 0 0
2000

ZOINT—STOCIC BANKS.
Dividend Amount
Name of Company. per of Paid. Price
Annum. Share.
£ s. d. £ s. d.
Australasia ••••• • • • • • 6/. per cent. 40 0 0 40 0 0 32
Brash North American 41• per cent. 50 0 0 50 0 0 49
Commercial of London 51. per cent. 100 0 0 20 0 0 22
Colonial .••• • .. • .... • • 51. per cent. 100 0 0 25 0 0 15%
Londn and Westminstr Si. per cent. 100 0 0 20 0 0 2714
London Joint-Stock ... 6/. per cent. 50 0 0 10 0 0 14%
Metropolitan
Provincial of Ireland.. 81. per cent. 100 0 0 25 0 0 5132
Ditto, New.• •• • • 8/. per cent. 10 0 0 10 0 0 20
National of Ireland .. 51. per cent. 50 0 0 17 10 0 20%
xat. rrovncial of Eng. Si. per cent. 100 0 0 35 0 9 38
Ditto, New. ....... • 51. per cent. 20 0 0 10 0 0
Union of Australia.... 25 0 0 25 0 0 25%
Union of London... • . 5/. per cent. 50 0 0 10 0 0 13

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT OF EXCHEQUER, July

(Nisi Prius Sittings in London, before the LORD CHIEF BARON
and Special Juries )
ANSTED AND OTHERS V. ARNETT.

The plaintiff, are eminent merchants in the City. The de-
fendant is a well-known Customhouse agent, and the action
was brought to recover 1811. from the defendant, which the
plaintiffs alleged had been paid by them to a former confidential
clerk of theirs, who comm►ttel suicide in 1841, and by him to
the defendant for clearing from the Custom-house a certain
quantity of goods belonging to them, which, however, were
removed without the payment of duty, and the duty on which
the plaintiffs were afterwards obliged to pay over again. Af er
a great deal of evidence had been gone into, the Lord Chief
Baron recommended the case to be referred, as it was impos-
sible for a jury to do justice between the parties.

HAYWOOD V. WDOWALL.
Mr. Sergeant Tallourd, Mr. Knowles, and Mr. Flood, ap-
peared for the plaintiff ; Mr. Martin for the defendant.
This action was brought nominally for a fortnight's wages,
but in reality to determine between the master printers and
the compositors of the metropolis two points—first, whether
ac2ording to the custom of the trade a fortnight's notice is
necessary to determine the contract of service on either side,
and, secondly, whether Parliamentary " appeal eases" should
be paid for at the rate of &I. or of 7d. per thousand letters.
At the commencement of the case, Mr. MARTIN said he did
not intend to dispute the first point, and would, therefore,
admit that the plaintiff was entitled to a fortnight's notice be-
fore he was discharged.
The only question, therefore, now to be determined was the
rate of payment.
The defendant is the well known printer, carrying on busi-
ness in Pemberton-row, Gough-square. The plaintiff is a
compositor. The defendant is honorary secretary to the
Master Printers' Association. The plaintiff is supported by
the body of London compositors. In January last the
defendant, who had not before hul" much Parliamentary
business. got an order to print an appeal case, " Ranger v. the
Great Western Railway Company. • As all business done
before Parliament, or in connexion with it, is paid for at a
higher rate than business done elsewhere, compositors charge
more for Parliamentary than other work, and require Bd. per
thousand for " appeal cases."j The] defendant offered only
7d. per thousand. This "the companionship," i.e. the body
of compositors in the defendant's employment, for this kind of
business refused to take. Though there was plenty of other
work in the office, the defendant A ould not give any employ-
ment to them, and they thereupon gave him a fortnight's no-
tice to leave. During this fortnight they were wholly unem.
ployed, and this action was brought by one of them for about
41., the snm which, on the average, he would be supposed
likely to make by piecework during the fortnight he was so
employed.
After a few witnesses had been dxamined for the plaintiff, the
case was adjourned till to-morrow.

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COUR.T.
OLD COURT.
(Before the RECORDER.)
Mary Anne Sailsbury, alias Salisbury, who pleaded
guilty to three charges of larceny at the May session,
but whose sentence was respited, was brought up for
judgment.
It will be recollected that the prisoner, when before
the magistrate, told a rather romantic story about her
having been seduced by a gentleman who brought her
to Lon‘on, and then deserted her, the whole of which
statement turned out to be a fabrication.

The RECORDER sentenced her to six months' impri-
soument, to commence from the period of her conviction.
(Before Mr. BULLOCK.)
Margaret Tiggell, 28, James Dunn, 23, and John Col-
liers, 28, were indicted, the first mentioned prisoner for
stealing a dressing-case, a ring, and other articles, the
property of David Kield, and the others with feloniously
receiving the property, knowing it to have been stolen.
Dlr. Ballantine conducted the prosecution, Mr. Payne
appeared for Tiggell, Mr. Doane for Collins, and Mr.
O'Brien for Dunn.

The case was one entirely devoid of interest, except
from the circumstance that the principle evidence
against the prisoners was the testimony of the female
prisoner's own sister, who spoke positively to her guilty
share in the transaction. There was, moreover, very
little corroboration of her evidence, and she admitted,
on being cross-examined, that she had herself been twice
convicted of felony, and sentenced upon one occasion to
be imprisoned six months, and upon another to be trans-
ported for seven years.
Mr. BALLANTINE, at the close of the case for the
prosecution, admitted that there was not sufficient evi-
dence against the prisoner Collins, and the other Learned
Counsel having addressed the jury for their respective
clients, the jury eventually found them all Not Guilty.
Emma Wilmot, aged 26, was indicted for stealing some
articles of silver plate, value lot., the property of Wm.
Paxton Jervis, in his dwelling-house ; and Sarah Vick,
aged 28, was charged with feloniously receiving the pro-
perty, knowing it to have been stolen.
Mr. Doane appeared for the prisoners.
It was proved, in evidence, that the prisoner Wilmot
was in the habit of going to the house of the prosecutor,
to visit one of his servants, named Chamberlain, and she
took the opportunity thus afforded her to purloin the
property. The only evidence against the other prisoner
was, that she had, shortly afterwards, pawned the plate,
but denied the fact when she was questioned by the police-
constable. It was admitted that ‘Vilmot had been very
respectable and well-conducted up to this transaction,
and it was suggested that she had committed the offence
under a sudden impulse, and from the pressure of tem-
porary circumstances of distress.
The jury found Wilmot guilty, and acquitted the pri
soner Vick. They recommended Wilmot to mercy.
She was sentenced to be kept to hard labour for
eighteen months.

POLICE IN TELLIGENCE.
(YESTERDAY.)
MANSION-HOUSE.

Capt. Wm. Mackay Heriott was summoned before the
Lord Mayor, by Mr. William Vincent, wine merchant,
of No. 45, Lime-street, for assault and battery.
The complainant, who was in a state of very palpable
excitement, stated that on Wednesday last, while in his
office, he heard an uproar in the street opposite to the
window, and he saw Capt. Heriott acting in an unjusti-
fiable manner towards his (Mr. Vincent's) cellarman,
and told the captain that he was not behaving like a
gentleman, but more like a blackguard. Capt. Heriott
felt, no doubt, indignant and insulted at the language,
and was disposed to use personal violence, for there
sprung up hot and angry words upon both sides.
The LORD MAYOR—And you told him he acted more
like a blackguard than a gentleman ? The complainant
—Certainly I did. I considered his conduct to my cel-
larman, who was quarrelling with another man, very
unwarrantable, and I did not conceal my opinion. Capt.
Heriott sent for a policeman to take my cellarman into
custody, and continued the uproar ; but the policeman
did not take the charge, and the captain followed my
partner, and in fact demanded an apology.
The LORD MAYOR—WeII, come to the assault.
The complainant—The assault did not take place till
next day. I then observed from my office the servant
of the gentleman, whose man had been quarrelling with
mine, go frequently in and out of his office, and when I
was going away, about three o'clock, to start by the
coach, carrying with me a parcel of the weight of 15 lbs.
under my arm, and having my gloves on, and an um-
brella in the other hand, out came the captain from the
opposite office, where he was lying perdu, and struck
me a violent blow' on the neck with a cane or whip. 1
thought I was cut with a knife, or other sharp instru-
ment, the blow was so severe.
The LORD MAYOR—Did he say anything to you be-
fore he struck you ? Complainant—l heard something,
but I cannot exactly say what, for really my senses were
taken away at the time. I had not time to turn my
head, when I revived the blow.
The LORD MAYOR—How did you proceed then ?
Complainant—l went back to my office. I still con-
sider my life in danger from Captain Heriott's violence.
I admit that at the time we were both very warm.
City policeman, 519, stated that he was called to in-
terfere when Mr. Vincent's man, and a person in the
employment of another gentleman, were quarrelling
about a wine basket. M. Vincent came down, and
Captain Heriott asked for his card, and the former said
the latter was a blackguard, and refused to give him his
card, and declared that he cared no more for the captain
than he cared for the stones in the street.
The LORD MAYOR—And you swear that he struck
you, Mr. Vincent, on the fallowing day ? The com.
p!ainant—l do, and I am still afraid of his violence.
Captain Heriott —You need not be in the slightest
degree afraid, upon my honour.
The LORD MAYOR—WeII, Captain Heriott, the
assault is diqinctly sworn to, and I shall bind you over
in your recognisances to the amount of 201. to appear at
the quarter sessions to answer any charge Mr.
Vincent may think proper to bring against you.
Captain Heriott said the fact was he interfered,
when he saw the two cellarmen disputing about the
interest of their masters, to prevent a breach of the peace,
and the consequence was that he was grossly insulted, as
lie could prove by the statements of several gentlemen
who were present, and who heard the unprovoked lan-
guage used by Mr. Vincent.
Here some gentleman showed an anxiety to be allowed
to speak.
The LORD MAYOR, however, obj, cted to hear them,
and said that Captain Heriott might, if the matter
went further, call forward his witnesses elsewhere. The
duty of the magistrate was quite plain in ouch a case.
Captain Heriott—The provocation was, as I can show,
very great.
The Loan MA.Yon—The assault took place on the

n
day after the alleged provocation was given. I cannot
alter my decision. ;di
Evan Evans, who was some days ago charged ``l/,
boring presented a forged clique f Jones
or the sum of
foe payment at tha bankin_-house of :Messrs.
n.
Lnyd and Co., was brought up for further examinatio
Mr. Alum,'Ns, of the firm of Bush and Mullins, On
citors to the Committee of Bankers for Protection
against Frauds and Felonies, said, he had no oljection
custo
consent to the discharge of the prisoner from et
upon entering into his own recognisances to aPpeaF
any time he might be called upon. at
Mr. HUMPHREYS, upon the part of the prisoner,
once acquiesced in the condition, and the prisprisonern
rliberated upon entering into his own recognisances the
sum of 501.
A man named Baker, was brought up for final els.
mina:ion
T uc upon
stated charge of bigamy. the
John ke that he was present when
prisoner married Sarah Alsworth, at Bath,
years ago, and he produced a copy of the notice of tee
marriage in the books of the church there. oTat
Prisoner—Then you are quite sure thatrs
(painting to the female who had him apprehendcui
the person I was married to. Witness—
swear she is.
The prisoner's marriage with another woman aubsr
quently having been likewise proved, thirtef
The LORD MAYOR committed him for trial.

COURT OF COIIIIIION COUNCIL',
Yesterday a Court was held specially for the porposof
of receiving and taking into consideration the roVrtig,
the Committee relative to the Charitable Trusts n
now in its progress through the House of Commor.s

THE CHARITABLE TRUSTS BILL.
After the disposal of some of the ordinary b.iaitel3 (0
the paper, tsci
Mr. DE JERSEY (the Chairman of the Parliamen-,1,0
Committee) brougl4Lup the report, cane subject of
Charitable Trusts Bill. It stated that the Bill was
Were
tremely exceptionabl ~ and that if its provisions
carried into effect much mischief would result to
l
public, and it recommended that the Court should Peof
tion against the measure, and apply to the mernbersro,
the Administration immediately for the purpose of Poi
curing its postponement. Mr. De Jersey spoke in terry
strongly condemnatory of the Bill, which had be,entood
pidly hurried through the House of Lords, and („e"nry
for a second reading that night in the House of `-aer
mons. He considered it to he unjust in its provisio..,
unconstitutional in its principle, anti capable °f be;
made an instrument to serve bad political purposes' be
the opinion of Lord Cottenham the Commissioners $0
appointed under it would have more power then
Lord Chancellor possessed in the Court of Chanel,
As to its unconstitutional tendency, the enormous ieig of
sitorial authority which it would place in the hneqbe
these officers was suanent evidence of that fact.
elle°
very working of the scheme would occasion an expect;
ruinous to the charities with which the Corninissie;bl
might think it necessary to interfere. He conclude'
moving that the Court should agree with the report~rt
Mr. R. TAYLOR said the Committee had, in the ref-ill,
before the Court, deprecated the principle of the
although they had, in the firmer report, thought pr nercllo
to approve of it. Now he considered that they ong"the
show that the Charitable Trusts Bill would placef
charities in a worse condition than that in which At be
stood at present. Nothing, in his opinion, 061%10
worse than their existing state. They all knew the"l3ol
trusts had been most flagrantly abused, and that the of
to which the Committee recommended the opposit%°,4o
the Court was a measure produced by men of experr-
and character. hie°
Mr. WIRE warmly advocated the report. He o—, oir
to the extraordinary powers with which the Coo id,
sioners to be appointed by the Bill would be ince,hey
and the private Star Chamber manner in which .pot
would exercise these powers.—(Hear, hear.) It di°,o,
signify whether the evidence upon which the Cellildbe
sioners chose to decide was true or false ; there Nv°ll'
no appeal from their decision. e 001
Mr. ANDERTON confessed that he could not se- (bet
such objections to the Bill as seemed to dismaY :410
people. On the contrary, although it was calcultst
injure men in the profession to which Mr. Will, be
himself belonged, the measure appeared to hitn,l,left
calculated to remove a great deal of existing ull'-1110
and he should vote against the recommendation-0
Committee.
Mr. PRENDERGAST opposed the report, and sir °r),air
supported the Bill. He contended that if the Clibe
sioners were only called judges, all prejudice Woe,,,ets
at an end against them ; but so many Commiseroir
had been recently appointed, that the name of Gel-,„'-, l'
sioner was alad one, and every one knew what wiiii-toe,/
ways the effect of giving a dog a bad name.---(Lath ilete
He had seen nothing in the Bill to lead him t°T;,,r,be,
that the tribunal would be a secret one ; and, in °OP
had not heard a word of argument against it. )fer,
could be more proper than the appointment of 00,,
ters in Chancery, and a member of the bar of tell/if/0
standing, to fill the situations ? He believed tnt-00
public would have as much reliance upon the decipjloll
of such officers as upon those of the Lord Chaec,:eeel
for certainly they were as little likely to be intit.' beo
by improper motives.—(Hear.) The Governme% re'
observed the monstrous abuses which existed in tmed-
gulation of charitable trusts, and had determinvoes
come forward upon a measure of reform ; and he,.,h be
that the Court, the majority of the members of ‘71;0011
believed to be alive to the interests of the const'LL-
would approve of the Bill, and support the non---erbet
He should propose that the Court proceed to the -
business on the paper. 0411
Deputy STEVENS seconded the amendment, and 100
that the Bill would substitute a very lazy and ohn°-
,
and depraved system. ,bets
Mr. WILLIAM JONES and several other b 1? par
opposed, in the most resolute tone, the measure ,",.„,oe'
liament, and called upon the Court to petition 1""
diately against it. Cti
The Court finally agreed to the report of the tioei
mit tee, and referred it back to them, with instilled t 0
to prepare a petition to the House of Commons, °e
take such other steps as might be considered nee°a

The Court then tid.journr:il.
g
[ADVERTISEMENT.]—DEAFNESS.—No. q,
merle-street, Piccadilly.—lnvisible Voice Collecollri
when fixed in the cavity of the ears, are not more ii!l0.01
fortable nor perceptible than having a small PlO OP
wool in its place. They enable individuals at ofesl
vanced age, and of forty or fifty years' standing „000:
treme deafness, instantly to join in general converra,
and to catch the sound of a distant, low sPee'- iar
church, theatre, &c. They pour the conversation,/
the ears to such an extent, that in most seve.,refeari
deafness cannot be observed. Also original rrii„", SO"
nets, French, German, and Spanish Artificial ig'iktec
improved Hearing Trumpets of every description. .An 0,
Jf those instruments have received the approbatl'4o;
the Royal Society and Royal Institution of GreeLtek
tain. The Newly Invented Spectacles, inune,lo,l"
they are placed before extremely imperfect 'or st,
`s brought to its. youthful, natural, and origine'sficre:
Also Achromatic Telescopes, Opera-glasses, ,„000;
scopes, &c.—Caution : Messrs. S. and B. so-a fit
ipticians and Aurists, are not in any way connecteneir:
person of the same name in their immediate 00;
9ourhood, nor in any part of the country. To Prot ir
nistakes, be cautious, and observe—Only to be 1110'
39, Albemarle-street, Piccadilly, opposite the York oil
[ADVERTISEMENT.]—BOTANIC WATER ANDtli:if
GREASE.—When the hair is becoming thin, and be
off, the only effectual remedy, besides shaving tilea
is the use of the two above-named articles, EPP': fie`:
ternately—the botanic water to cleanse the root- r
scurf and as a stimulant, and the bear's grease f th 6
nourisher. If any further evidence was required erfl
virtues of bear's grease for renovating and prey otl,
the hair, Mr. Catlin's account of the quantity usc-:Atri
the length of hair obtained by some of the North ,
rican Indians, would be a sufficient answer. lielotrein
Sons, 119 and 120, Bishopsgate-street, who first fit
duced the use of bear's grease in this country, en pee
fat and kill the animals, recommend the public tele!?
chase none other but with their names and .10g,,0
printed on the pot, or the chances are their obtain iisP
spurious article. All vegetable oils applied to the
are worse than useless. 00'
[ADVERTISEMENT.] THE EARL OF
ROUGH AND HOLLOWAY'S PILLS.—An astoundh3 fail
„,r
by this miraculous medicine after every means b
—See extract of his Lordship's letter, dated.„„ofer;
Messina, Leghorn, February 21st, 1845.—T0 r'; r
Holloway.—Sir, I beg to acquaint you that ri,ucji
have effected a cure of my liver and stomach oni of;
the most eminent of the faculty at home and „-
the continent had not been able to effect, nay, not el.'4
waters of Carlsbad or Marienbad. (Signed) Aldboroo r tO,
These wonderful pills will cure any disease of the life, WI:
stomach. Sold (also Holloway's Ointment) at Profess;oor
loway's establishment, 224, Strand, and by all vendors
cine throughout the civilised world. b°
DARING ROBBERY.—Monday afternoon, top'
four o'clock, the following daring robbery was comMitted,
residence of Samuel Winslead, Esq., in the New.rosa• 11
Winslead had called in a female hawker of stove ornaine.nhe
the purpose of purchasing one, and the woman was left in ""tio,h,
whilst the servant carried the articles upstairs for the 1111Pef,ip
her mistress. In the meantime the woman contrived to ot, col
parlour table, which was laid for dinner, of the whole of 0000a
tents, consisting of silver spoons and forks, as well
silver cruet stand, with which she got clear off, the art"'
being missed till some time after her
BIRTH'S.

On the 7th inst., the lady of &ell Fane, Esq., °I •
Brook-street, of a daughter. l"lel(
On the 7th inst., at Cambridge-place, Camberwel
•
road, the wife of Mr. Lewis W. Moncrief, of a soil. fitioalat;.
On the 7th inst., at Hammersmith, Mrs. Peter ‘-' of
ham, of a daughter. ~.,0 wired,
On the Bth inst., at Hambleden Rectory, Bucks, I,' abt"
the Rev. W. H. Ridley, Rector of Hambledon, of a °a
4
V ARRIED. Call'Ati
On the Ist inst., at Rugby, W. C. Western,
_E•54l' OP'
in the 32d Madras Native Infantry, to Jane Hanna,'
10 ,
only daughter of the late Donald Maclean, Es' 9: ifillio,
On the sth inst., at St. James's, Piccadilly, nellrfjollas •
Rolle, Esq., of Park-road, Stockwell, to Sarah
notoe'
youngest daughter of the late M. Jones, Esq., of I3r°
404
.9.716 O. . Ala

On the sth inst., at Larkhall-lane, Claplaarg,
wife of Mr. C. Iles.
On the sth inst., at Camberwell, Miss ,
Leake. Ateher,ll,
Mr. Si nt

On the 6th inst.,in Bedford-square, Mr. Sergea_ wii
On the 16th ult., at Bedford, the Rev. W. B. of
M.A., late of Trinity College, Cambridge. PU
On the 3d inst., at the Imperial Hotel, Cheltenhareqry, s
Charles Johnson,
.3d Regiment Bombay Native Infe'ra Or
On the 4th inst., Ann Washbourne, wife of Willia
eon, of the Old Kent. road, aged 68. Guer nee/'
,
On the 4th inst., at the Rectory, St. Martin e, 1,
Sophia Ann, eldest daughter of the Rev. R. Potenger'W.
On the sth inst., in Nicholas-lane, Lombard-stree/
ob.
' •
Pou
Onon. ~, to of
j
lt
the 6th inst., at Pusey Rectory, Mary, illuo'. •
Poore, aged 70. ii,''
~..fse 01f56'11/:
Lousou , mintedend eublished by MURDO Y so, 14 ,
No. 112, Strand, Printer. at The Sus Offiee,,,-.• -gjitY
Strand, in the Precinct -Of the Savoy, in the ""
.Iliadlelex, Wedniulay, July 9, 1845. .