The Sun.
London, England, 1845-11-28 00:00:00

LORD JOHN RUSSELL AND THE
CORN-LAWS.
(From the Times.)

It is ascribing not so much to Lord JOhn Russell's character
and position as to Ministerial blindness and difficulties, to
pronounce the letter " to the electors of the city of London"
the final deathblow of the corn-laws. Opportunity, which
makes a child a match for a giant, has conferred en Lord
John Russell a principal share in a noble achievement. It
has been left to him to dictate the terms of a great capitula-
tion. A few weeks, nay, a few days ago, Sir Robert Peel
might have done this with comparative freedom and com-
parative honour. Though not the highest act of initiative
wisdom, it might still have been the generous humility of a
great statesman, ready to sacrifice his own consistency for
his country's advantage. Lord John Russell has made the
measure his own, and it cannot now be taken away. What-
ever place in the tuella of public controversy the proposition
of a perfectly free trade in corn has lately or long ago held,
Lord J. Russell is the foremost in the great political group to
link with it his name and his fortunes. . The Premier cannot
now adopt it without adding to all his other difficulties and
disagreeables the ignomony of being taught and led by a
rival. The public sense of justice will not quarrel at
such a result. It is fit that Sir Robert Peel should
have no portion in that which is not really in any
sense his own ; and the whole world might have repelled the
illusion which should make him appear to be the author. The
Premier only fulfils his own instinct and follows his destiny;
and we shou!d be puzzled, if not disappointed, were be to
act otherwise. Mistaking his own vocation, he thinks to
dictate principles rather than to adopt them from the people.
Thus he holds on to systems till they are virtually abrogated
by the decisions of the national mind. He waits till that
abrogation only requires to be recorded,—till it is reckoned,
realised, and all but historical, till, in the city phrase, it is
actually "discounted" by the political world, and then at the
last moment he comes in and consents to be vanquished with
as good a grace as he can ; making up for the ignominy of a
real defeat by gaining a victory over his friends. When
concession is inevitable, it is wise to concede before necessity
destroys both freedom of thought and dignity of movement.
It is wiser, also, to read and learn a political lesson before it
has to be enforced ,ty the rough discipline of events. Lord
John Russell does not boast himself greater than nature,
kinder than Providence, or wiser than the people. He cons his
task with all docility, and confesses that he is the wiser for it.
Hence he becomes the fit historian of the Premier's wilfulness .
" But I confess that on the general subject my views have
in the course of 20 years undergone a great alteration. I
used to be of opinion that corn was an exception to thige-
neral rules of political economy, but observation and experi-
ence have convinced me that we ought to abstain from all
interference with the supply of food. Neither a Government
nor a Legislature can ever regulate the corn market with the
beneficial effects which the entire freedom of sale and pur-
chase are sure of themselves to produce. I have for several
years endeavoured to obtain a compromise on this subject.
Jai 1839 I voted for a Committee of the whole House, with
the view of supporting the substitution of a moderate fixed
ditty for the sliding-scale. In 1841 I announced the
intention of the then Government of proposing a
fixed duty of Bs. a quarter. In the past session I
proposed the imposition of some lower duty. These propo-
sitions were successively rejected. The present First Lord
of the Treasury met them in 1E39, 1840, and 1841, by elo-
quent panegyrics of the existing system—the plenty it bad
caused, the rural happiness it bad diffused. He met the pro-
positions for diminished protection in the same way in which
he had met the offer of securities for Protestant interests in
1817 and 1825—in the same way in which he met the pro-
pcsal to allow Manchester, Leeds, and Birmingham to send
Members to Parliament in 1830. The result of resistance to
qualified concessions must be the same in the present instance
as in those I have mentioned. It is no longer worth while
to contend for a fixed duty. In 1841 the free-trade party
would have agreed to a duty of Bs. a quarter on wheat, and
after a lapse of years this duty might have been further re-
duced, and ultimately, abolished. But the imposition of any
duty at present, without a provision for its extinction within
a short period, would but prolong a contest already suffi-
ciently fruitful of animosity and discontent." Everybody
has experienced the sensation of having been at some time
or other before exactly in one's present position and circum-
stances—of having before seen, or heard, or said the very
same things as at this present moment. One asks, " Havel
dreamt this ?" "Is this the recollection of a former
•
state ? Or is it all a reverie ?" Sir Robert Peel
sets one rubbing one's eyes under this visionary im-
pression. Surely all this show of desperate clinging to
the corn-laws, protracted till the patience and the mo-
deration of the people are utterly worn out,—surely, this
intense determination of the applicants, and rapid aggrava-
tion of their claims, has all passed before. By what acci-
dent does it revisit our senses? It has all passed before.
With a trifling change of circumstance it is the perpetually
recurrent action of the Conservative leader. It is the old
plot, the old charactees, the old dresses, the old scenery done
up with just the alteration of an incident, a name, or a patch.
A few dabs of paint have changed the ruined castle into a
barn, and the church into a hay-stack. Instead of spears
there are pitchforks, the carbonari for this evening are
poachers, and the Venetian senators are tricked out for a
rural procession. The casual company of the boxes may be
delighted with that novelty of the entertainment; but the
more knowing frequenter of the pit is disgusted at the im-
pudence of the fraud. The peculiar line which the Premier
has worked into system, and which is the historical reality
represented by the name of Conservatism, has been illustrated
by various images more or less fitting and dignified. It has
been likened to ballast, to the dragchain, and the safety-
valve. We are inclined to think people have missed the
most appropriate emblem. The Right Hon. Baronet
and his party are the stopcock of the nation. It is the
spirit of this age, at least, to move by steam ;—that
is, by a series of explosions. If public opinion had continual
legislative vent, it would waste itself in idle noise, and never
accumulate the power for effective measures. Conservatism
offers itself to obstruct the passage. Sir Robert Peel chokes
it with himself. After a brief interval, fresh steam has been
generated, and the social piston has ascended to its former
place. With the most mechanical precision Sir Robert with-
draws, and the steam does its brief and powerful work.
Without so useful an appendage we should have continual
waste,—without its periodical retirement we should have a
destructive catastrophe. sThe nation is a very hard creditor.
Discharge its lawful demands as they become due, and the
cost is tolerable. Let the account run, or pay your debt
with a.mere note of hand, and you soon find yourself over-
verwhelined with arrears, and compound interest hunting
you down. No usurer could be more extortionate. After a
long period of perhaps imaginary insult and vexatious delay,
the people demands its pound of flesh with an almost insanity
of purpose. Has Sir Robert forgotten how quickly the hum-
ble petition for two Members for Birmingham being once
superciliously denied, grew up to the awful dimensions of
"the Bill, the whole Bill ?" Has he forgotten that and
twenty other cries of furious onslaught, and final victory?
Refuse a fixed duty, and you have no other choice
given you but a total repeal. You cannot now offer
the alternative which you have yourself taught the
people to despise. The only question is, what further de-
mands will now be added? Had you capitulated, it would
have been on terms. You choose to be stormed, and must
now submit to the conditions of an enemy flushed with
triumph and angered with delays. But how can a man
make terms who is himself hampered by conditions? There
is the rub. It is perhaps the fundamental defect of Sir R.
Peel's position that he never was a through master of it.
He feels the hardship of his case, and the sense of injustice
makes him the more unscrupulous. What servant ever was
faithful to a hard master? The landowner, represented by
his House, constitutes Sir Robert his attorney in the national
suit. The Baronet is nothing loth, and offers to procure good
terms. " Stand by me, and I will stand by you." Mean-
while he knows they are in heart only standing by them-
selves, and be accordingly only stands by himself. It is in-
credible that lie should really imagine, with his experience,
that he can effectuate their conditions, and maintain the as-
cendancy of a class. Yet he flatters and eludes their imbecile
expectations by still negotiating on that hollow basis. Go
on, Sir Robert, master of a policy your own. Lead your
friends into the treacherous defile of a proud and intractable
obstinacy; and then, whatever be the glory of that achieve-
ment, deliver them up to the foe. You need not fear. You
have the gift of infinite plausibility, and your friends, often
as you have deluded them, will nevertheless trust you again.

(From the Chronicle.)
The comments, if such they may be called, of the Govern-
ment and monopoly journals upon Lord John Russell's letter
are the best proof that it is a decisive blow. The whole su-
perstructure of protection, patched and propped up as it is by
a hundred make-shift expedients, totters from the shock, and
will, before very long, come to the ground. The dismay, the
annoyance, the exasperation of Ministerialists and Protec-
tionists exceed all bounds, and we may say all utterance.
They foam at the mouth, and cannot for very rage make
known articulately the grounds of their discontent. Their
overcharged souls seem to find no relief but in a free use of
the most abusive epithets. As specimens of their flowers of
speech, take the following from the Morning Herald :
"Matchless presumption," "unexampled indifference to
shame," " stale.and vapid sneers," "low and spiteful spirit,"
and divers passages as wise and well-toned as the following:
—" Lord John's changes bare always been made at
the tail of the worst and wickedest rabble, because decent
persons renounced him, and always made with some
aspect to a violent convulsion. Such is the mean and had
spirit of the man, and such is the spirit of his letter." The
Post, in like manner, is so vehemently angry that it quite
forgets the proprieties. " Great ignorance," " great spiteful-
ness," " impudent assertions," " unmitigated nonsense,"
" cool effrontery," " a man so utterly shameless as Lord John
Russell," are some of the phrases which our: polite Contem-
porary thinks applicable and becoming in discussing the
Noble Lord's letter. To reason with people in such a state
of frenzy would be waste of time. Let them by all means go
on and " unpack their hearts with words," if they find it a
relief. The public will look on quietly and form its own
conclusion, remembering the old moral to be drawn when
disputants are seen to lose their temper. The really provok-
ing feature of Lord. John Ruisell's address' is, that it com-

biiies weight of argument with weight of authority.
It exhibits, with extraordinary brevity, clearness,
and force, the main considerations by which the
policy of England should at the present moment
be governed. Almost any one of its pregnant sen-
tences contains matter enough for an essay. How fruitful a
topic, for instance, is the contrast, brought home to us by a
few striking words, between the present state of prices and
that, which would arise under a healthy system ? Variations
in prices, when not artificially produced, are the result of a
highly beneficial law in social economy. The price of food,
when settled by natural causes, is the best regulator of con-
sumption. Cheapness in such a case indicates plenty, and
favours a free use of the bounties of Providence, without
leading to any evil results. Dearness proves scarcity, and
obliges us to be sparing in the consumption of a supply which
is insufficient for our ordinary wants. Whenever Govern-
ments have attempted to alleviate the evils of scarcity by
forcibly preventing prices from ascending beyond a certain
point, all men are now aware that instead of oiminishing they
have aggravated the mischief. But if any other causes pre-
vent prices from accurately indicating the extent of the sup.
ply on which we may count, evils of the same kind mutt
inevitably follow. At the present moment, partly from
natural and partly from artificial causes, the prices of food
do not truly inform us of the state of our supplies. In the first
place, the price of potatoes, though much higher than usual,
is kept down by the fact that they are known to be perish-
able. Who will fill his stores with stock of this kind, when'
he has no reasonable assurance that two or three months may
not convert it into a heap of rottenness ? The consumption
of potatoes, therefore, beyond a doubt, is not checked, as it
would be if the preservation for nine months even of the
' deficient supply now available could be relied on. The price
of corn is deranged by other causes, and is a source of much
and very pernicious error. Averages, always to a cer-
tain extent deceptive, are now more so than they have
probably ever been, from the large proportion of this
year's wheat crop which is of an inferior quality. There
is scarcely any newspaper reader whose eye has not fre-
quently rested,. within the last few weeks, on para-
graphs like the following, which is from Newcastle-upon-
Tyne The.bulk of straw is the largest ever known. On
all our best soils the crops were much lodged and beaten
down : this caused the ear to fill badly, and the grain to be
thin and shrivelled. The anxiety of our farmers to secure
their crops led them to hurry much into their stack-yards in
the worst condition. The greater portion, consequently,
comes to hand unsound, and so soft as to be quite unfit to
grind without the use of the kiln. From our poor lands,
where the plant was thin and not laid, the sample is some-
what better. On thrashing, the yield of the whole proves

extremely defective." Other accounts tell us that a l!trgtti
proportion of this year's crop will not grind well unless 11
with old wheat, and that for that purpose, if there 111 in.•
other, foreign corn will be needed. But the quantitY 9 . it
ferior wheat now in our market, and the way in whcaqr.
operates upon the averages, was most clearly shown bY
Baines, in his speech at the great Leeds meeting. ke „s. last
" Let them observe that the price of the best wtie"`best
year was 545, per quarter, whereas the price of the.
quality this year was 745. per quarter, thus, rultruled
difference of 20s. per quarter between the two perods isst
to.—(Hear, hear.) Now the range of average wheat,ice and
year was 40s. per quarter for the lowest quality of
been 405.
51s. for the highest; but this year the range has
for the lowest quality, and 745. for the bighest.—eflll`4„
hear.) Last year the difference in the range was onilie, of
per quarter between the highest and the lowest qua(glesr,
wheat, but this year the difference amounted to ,
3w 0-4 this
hear.) That showed conclusively that there as ", the
moment a great quantity of bad and low-priced wheat ;I,een
country—(Hear , hear)—the effect of which was to f.
down the averages, and, by keeping them down, t° keePo-ijrPa
the duty, which prevented the importation of foreiglaveo
just at the time when it was most wanted." Thus we aka.
price of corn, as well as a price of potatoes, which clnble
lated to give us false impressions of the extent of our ay% bf
resources, and to hide from us in some degree the dangeldid
which we are threatened. This derangement of the Stall]. the
by which our usual calculations are regulated renders it at st.
more necessary to take every precaution prudence can Suterly
We see the course pursued by neighbouring nations sim; .0,
situated, and the effects it is producing. Belgium, fors! t
stance, finding her supply of food short, or fearing thml3ll
may prove so, opens her ports to all the world, and fre
her
quarters she receives what she requires. It comes tofron
from the Baltic and the Black Sea, from Italy and sent
France—nay, from England and Scotland, whence it is,e.
away. beyond a doubt, by the operation of the slidingSj.
That it should be as easy, or even easier for us than or
not
gium, to get supplies in this way, and that we sbou..
only neglect them, but keep up a law by which theYll;cl)
excluded, is not very creditable to the co3.mon sense*. g•
Englishmen are supposed to show in all business transactricl;
but we may fairly hope that the time draws near at Wit be
our reputation, so far as this matter is concerned, WI
fully vindicated.

(From the Advertiser.) Sebi
We yesterday, atttr perusing the manifesto of the ,efita
Member for the City of London, predicated the isljeiel
annihilation of the landlords' monopoly. We 140
equal confidence anticipate thc abandonment of flat ~bicl)
if that can be said to be susceptible of extinction v• But
never, strictly speaking, had a tangible existenc, the
though not in the literal sense ever having had a mindshe of
fixed-duty principle possessed a strong bold on the c
the Whigs, as a party. It will he cease to hav,Gi lb'
that existence. As a principle, it has received its oof
blow. The letter of Lord John Russell to the eleloel
the city of London, and that of Lord Morpeth to
osi
.
of Leeds, coming simultaneously, and without any P, w
understanding between the two Noble Lords, have ghilost
moderate fiked-duty principle its finishing eto'ke'
will Sir R. Peel do now ? He has but one of two courrhser be
to him. He must make his choice between them.
must abandon the monopolists to their fate, and bringosio
measure for the repeal of the corn-laws, or hem u,,,stese sr
e
office, and make way for a successor who will. 1.14 t 0
the alternatives set before the Premier. It is for hwititi!,
make a selection. Which will he choose? A littie,ooll
will tell? We have our opinion as to the coarse fot
pursue. He will not resign ; or if he do it will only be
a particular purpose, namely, that of frightening bis or-0111
if party he can still be said to have, into an acquieetentef
corn-law abolition. If he tender his resignation ea -",,51161
into the hands of his Sovereign, it will only be to be tvr.
Bb
to office as a total and immediate corn-law repeal
will then carry the extinction of bread- tax rn0n0pe,,..e.401
a high hand. He will carry it without an effort. fon', th,
down with despair, and overwhelmed with etifustb. ve
landed interest will be incapable of making even 3 B,lCit
inn
resistance. Let us not be misunderstood. We r„,tiora°,lor
that Sir Robert Peel will ever avow himself, as "-,e-ejest.ce,
Russell and Lord Morpeth have done, a convert to Le oge
of corn-law extinction. But the want of any stlell,:rei
tion will prove no barrier to his introducing a in`—ealo'
the immediate and entire repeal of the imposts on
food. Sir Robert Peel has no idea that a convictiol4°ooll
justice of a measure, is at all necsssary to it being voree,l;
forward. The greatest measures ever proposed au" f
by him, have not been grounded on any conviction 0,1
justice, but because he deemed it expedient that theYf Act::
pass. Witness the repeal of the Test and Corporatioil-coic
That measure he always disliked. It was not frota,.c:fid:,
it was from dire necessity he consented to bring it ',tool',
Doubly true does the remark hold in reference to
Emancipation. The Premier never pretended to level
that measure on the ground of it being just. It Wash e
lie felt it to be expedient—in other words, bee/1108h,, nit";
not help himseif, but must either carry it f?';
sure or resign, that he consented to bring -or,
ward. And so of nearly all the great Ineaente,,,,g, fe'.
Sir Robert has been instrumental in- carrying. o,ts'
of the corn-laws will, we doubt not, add another to „ eg",;
lague of measures which the Premier has yielded ib'eeere
diency or necessity, but which he would never haTe,,
forward from a conviction of their justice. Buti..tee'L'
spoken of a second alternative. We have sunncise- it
het
ble, though improbable in the highest degree, that, t r5l
mier will resign office altogether and permanent4ee cf".;o
than be the instrument of carrying the abolition 0' „old 1111
monopoly. Even were it so, the circumstance ll'lte,l
prevent the repeal of the corn-laws. Lord Johti!ship,so
would be the successor of Sir Robert in the Peelni.Le in°lli,c;
one of his first measures would be to abolish the I`-ifie 'f",
poly. Under any circumstances, therefore, and t°
.004
mimsterial changes there may, the repeal of the 011001,,,,I).
not only inevitable, bat will be immediate. We rer!,,,ieg
we yesterday said, that, before a fortnight of the co.-
sion has passed, the doom of the monster monopollotete
formally sealed by Parliament, and the time for it 9
tion announced.

DUTCH MAIL. iva '
THE IlinuE, Nov. 23.—We have received u-he t'
pers to the 20th of August. The following are
op.
tracts :
nassor f
" BATAVIA, AUG. s.—Accounts from lea.nounce that on the night of July 7, heavy anbecolv;r
rain did great damage at Bouthain, on the gr.,' tbe,
of Celebes, and cans( d the rivers to overre"oq'
banks. The fields were from 2 to 5 feet linaeroily u,;
The rampart of Fort Rotterdam is almost hOtel
stroyed, and there is a breach in the dock to t"- of
of 50 feet. a ih
" The River Bouthain, flowing by the Ati`mrhres"„6
Baroe, carried away a piece of ground 50 feet ia,:g
and 200 feet in length, with two houses stands
it, the inhabitants of which were saved.
which eft SiP;
" His Majesty's steam-frigate Brome
capore on the 13th of August, and, after t°"l,-- ofr,il
Reona and Munlok, arrived here on the 17tlioloio
month, has brought a part of the overland mails /11041's
Europe on the 7th and the 24th of June. Chi°44•li
regular communication between Europe an age "0
opened. It appears from the dates that the YoYiricb tej
performed in a very short time. The mail ri-refic"hii
expected from London on the 21st of June' dof f',
Ceylon on the 27th of July, Penang on the 211, r 3300;
month, and Batavia on the 27th of this month a'rore, Peo,
The voyage from London to Sincapore was, that% 10'
formed in 42 days, and to Batavia in 55 daYst
noro,
nine days passed at Sincapore. g'ac4
"If vte are rightly informed, the delay at 7tti,os
was that the greater part of the mails ofh se el
June, and among them most of those from .15:1rrilr;11
to have been sent to Calcutta, and had notio" 0
when the Brome left Sincapore. Apart "tile e4of
unforeseen delay, we may affirm that when sonar,
munication is entirely organised, and the °gook° io
sending letters and newspapers generally kittoohl
by the overland mail may be received at
r o
50 days. of 01
" His Excellency M. J. Rochusser, Gen,ehr; 281"
possessions in India, arrived at Batavia on 1-.140tt• 5,
September, on board of her Majesty's frigate JP- 1134,0
A royal resolution, of the 13th of Febrnari),;'ollll.
annulling the decision of the Governor-Gen,er,,,a. realqo
of 15th December, 1843, Mr. M. Le Roux. Jai- for Ar"
at Baum, is relieved from all responsibiLitthe
extrordinary measures taken by him to queligostics'
rection of the Chinese miners in the island 01'
September, 1843."
DUTCH FUNDS.—AmsTEnDAM, Nov 24.
131114'
Alone,' 6,2°
Actual Debt, 2% per Cent...• • 59•4 9;
hat% 3 per Cent •••• • 72, 9-A,4
Ditto, 4 per Cent........... •• :• n 9.5
L 4 99'
Amort Syndic, 4% per Cent...... •• • • "'" ,;•••
Ditto, 3% per Cent-- • •• ••
Commercial Company, 4% per Cent • •
East India Loan, 4 per Cent.-- •• • •
Exchange on London, at sight •• • • `"' 4Y.
Two months 12
01
On Hamburgh, at sight •• • • 3g5,
Two months.- ••• • • • 'n.;
On Paris ........ •••• • • .• "'
Two months.

—Dutch Papers, Noy. 25. sfe
IMS. so ,040
[ADVERTISEMENT.]—CASES OF DERA''-,2111 tbe
)(wens, SICY-HEADACHES, WITH Loss OF STS.-00 ifer
ENERGY, CURED BY HOLLOWAY'S PILLS.---1! old (Pift,
above cases the hands and feet swell, the face rius'y-ibe `r. 0
times a sense of fulness will be aotieed to exist abooloopeis 9i,
attended generally with much nervousness 1104,,,d in dr°,loor,
spirits. These symptoms, if neglected, frequentlY,°';',.,d Pee
paralysis, or apoplexy. To regain full hod° —aosir' via'
eat no vegetables, get plenty of exercise in the °P" ise° tel/
take Holloway's Pills, according to the directionlorle 01
them, when any of the complaints named Will be 0,01
eradicated from the system, even when every atberaoo
had failed.—Sold by all druggists, sad at ProCess°r h.
Establishment, 244, Strand, London. i
gel''
, wgther" ,
BIRTHS.
On Wednesday, the 26th inst., the wife of J• „1P
Esq., surgeon, of a son. ' f gel
.
On the l6th inst., at Sheerness, Kent, the li'llf ° • ta of°
F. G. Campbell, 91st Regiment, of a daughter. i
On the 24th inst., at Hampstead, Mrs. Henri ' °
wife
daughter. 'll tbe
c otlew,
On the 25th inst., at Howley-villas, Maida-hi ' 140'
Joseph Radford, Esq., of a son. "et,
On the 25th inst., at Stansted Mountfichet, -1' I+
'll Al
W. Fuller Maitland;of a son. „In ?
On the 2.5 th inst., at New Park-road, Bristo -
...„...,
James Spicer, of a son. _--------- the
t e Vev.'lll°
MARRIED
On the 22d inst, at Horsley_, Glen. cestershireylig.bhcer °I r
C. Hayward, to Elizabeth Esther, second " ..sbir' sie '
late Rev. J. Phelps, Rector of Alderley, Glouceethecbielifep W.
On the 25th inst., at St. Bartholomew'sChur° ; late - f
George Duke, Esq., to Mary, only daughter of th o'i.
Hopkinson, Esq., of Millbrook, near SouthamPt°ll.r 136i,1°'
On the :,15th inst., at Lee Church, William Cal;
1; g. clit
Lee.groye, Blackheath, to Ann Mary, only survivi 039°
P
the late Mathias Dipnall, Esq • ' , to.,
On the 26th inst ,at All Solds' Church, Marvie et'
Painter, Esq., of Berners-street, to Miss LucY 13e1113
— ~ fog'
DIED. „ 1100.0 ,
On the 19th inst., at Brighton, James Will'i'- t o'll.
M.D., of Stratton Hall, Cheshire „ cl, ""ii A
On the 22d inst., at York-row,.
Kennington —l' Col"'
Sandell, daughter of W. Spriggs.
On the 23d inst., at Turnhit Arit-
m- een, Liente" li"
Or
Alexander Daniel, of the (S3d Regiment.r f ll gr. ,
On the 24th inst., Elizabeth, the Wife 0
'e
la
'ruin, of Leadenhall-street. roo
On the 24th inst., Duncan Sinclair, Esq., °f
Middlesex. : stl• f ifOr
On the 24th inst., at Fulham Anthony Aust'vv.' et 6' 0
On the 25th inst., Mary, the ' wife of G. Faiths J's rle'
... CO
sail-road, Brixton
shOeannthaen2, sEtshq.inst., in the Grove, Kentish-tn/P4
1400,11,,-,
_
London : Printed anu Published y 3—Rpo YOoCll_,fe .rilt."l
Strand, Printer, at The Sun Ofilebo No. 112, StraniAl47, ;4"
of the Savoy, in the County of 11Liddlesoa, °l-
n, 1,846.