The Sun.
London, England, 1827-11-05 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.-(THIS PO)

COURT OF CHANCERY•

JFNKINS T. GOULD.
agent, manager, Danielma
was engaged for him in a great many bill neel
tions ; he had got from Mr. Jenkins a mortgage
ager, anduld rwase e e ifory e
r many
of
my era. rset n the :
n s os 1. i ci
agt.lo
his property, for the purpose of securing to higl4'
balance that might ultimately be found due to Pie,
and he now claimed an immease balance. He hadnelsi,
rendered any account or bill of costs, and tiltimatelYo
leged that the transactions had been so numerous so
complicated as to render that impracticable. Ile
proceeding to sell the estate that had been mortis'
to him, when at the instance of the plaintiff si/Dfr
junction
issued to restrain him from doing 50.
Jenkins alleged that the mortgage was granted as' "6,4
urgent request of the defendant, and that the ry
was prepared solely by Mr. Gould himself. to
judgment of the Court, delivered to-day Was, ;
Mr. Gould ought to have rendered an acc0°11"0"
accounts regularly; that the Master must.nofPord
ceed to take the accounts between the parties' to
that the injunction should be continued till after

Master made his report.
MILLER v. ELKINS.
His LORDSHIP stated, that in this case 010,
Muller was the tenant for life of a house in V:let
haugh-street ; Mr. Miller was appointed a rec:oo
of it. Several distresses were put into the U.„'ipf
for the purpose of recovering the rent, or tiwid
out the tenant in possession, tly which a great
i:d
of expence was incurred : one of the procelrov
was removed into the Court .of King's Bench. to
Miller gave notice that she would have nothinfo
do with those proceedings, and now the Betel of
applied to be allowed to deduct these costs out
the rents and profits due to Mrs. Miller.
-pteceifes
suchioenostths,atanticie
t—herQfdi
-
h had
dismissed
The
r Ci
:ht
the 'ot'
petition.dwe rnas anodf

ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. 'GEE,
This was an information filed by the Attol
General at the relation of the trustees of a ell'floo
in Essex, described in the pleadings, for the purl) of
of having that charity put under the manageteellibe
the Court. A decree pronounced declared that
property had been misapplied, through a misaPP,bl
hension of the Vicar, and referred the matter to,
Master, to approve Of a scheme for the future ler ,
nagement of the charity; the Master made his fr
port, and at present it stood for judgment OP°ll e
ceptions to that report. tied
His LORDSHIP'S opinion upon all those exceP-dif
was, that the Master had judged wisely and pr°P-
and that the exceptions ought to be overruled.
BROWN V. DE TASTET. vde
Mr. HEALD replied in this motion that he A- ,
fkl'
on behalf of the defendant on Saturday. L°'„-deti
don, on the day he went out of office, made an °O.
directing Mr. De Tastet to pay into Court, 18'„•00
at the same time allowing the defendant's excerpt
to the report that made that sum appear to bietbst
from him to the plaintiff. Mr. Heald conceive(' ;vet
as his Lordship had allowed the exceptions be 11;00
could at the'same time have ordered the money 'oil
Court, except erroneously, and therefore he aP:d
to stay the execution of that order. It was ss.
the other side, that the case had been before tos
Masters, that the first had found an infinitely laref,ool
to be due from the defendant, and that thougnctbe
Eldon had considered the principle on vvhif"ost
second report was made erroneous, yet he fe'"Alhot
at all events 18,0001. must be fortheoming,llo
he ought to secure that ; moreover, the doe,' Op
ought to have brought the case before the. Li°
upon a petition of rehearing instead of a innti°:t.
the
The LORD CHANCELLOR was of opinion, ti, 00
case ought to have been brought before 141°,1r/110
petition of rehearing; it was impossuo-
rot
he could substantially say Lord Eldon judglte
was wrong, without having had all the ni
rials before him, which a petition of reheino
alone could have brought forward; and therefore
felt bound to refuse the motion.
Mr.HoßoNrEdteirle onunp,on th
beeha(lifefoefndthaei.itp,
ment of the :18,0001, Coat'
His Loustup ordered it to be paid into
on or before the last day of Term. plaintiff,
i fi
the rtlY3.
fir a short