The Sun.
London, England, 1827-06-26 00:00:00

15,690 Cwt. Flour-- 9 stone
420 Oatmeal 11 stone
Sold to Bakers only,
14,496 Cwt. Flour

Avorage price c
Receipts of Flour, 12.
Sales of , Do. 7

io 0
17. 6

Quartern Loaf, 41b,

Wheat,
per barrel
stone.

16 0
faWlieat and Flour,
570 Firsts, I
;L.; Seconds,
PRICE OF BAXAD,
)z. i)d. I Half-qr
Barley.

per bairel
16 %tope.

Oats. Flour, per civ, t,
per barrel r.-:.--...,....1.
1 stone. Ist. 1 2d.

- I S. 11: as. et. s. d. a s. d. s. d. a s. d. d. as. (1.
Cork 0- 0 0 16 6.-19 6 15'4-719 4 IS 0...20 0 16 0-18 0
Limerick 27 8-..-31 8 16 0-17 6 17 0-,-17 6 19 0-- 0 0 15 0-17 0
Waterford 30 0.-33 0 16 0-16 0 13 0-15 0 17 0-18 0 12 6-15 6
Belfast 28.0-.6 6 16 0-21 0 15 9-17 6 17 6-18 0 21 0-22 0
Clonmel - 30 0-31 8 16 6-17 6 16 4-18 1 15 0-.16 6 11 0-16 6
Tralee.--. 0 0- 0 0 0 0- 0 0 14 0-15 2 0 0- 0 0 0 0- 0.0
Carlow 28.9-31 0 18 0-20 0 18 0-19 0. 0 0- 0 0 010-. 0,0
Galway - 32 0-30 7 16 0-17 0 19 0- 0 0 16 6-17 6 13 6-14 6
Beef, Mutton, pork,
per lb. per lb. ' per cad. Ist. 2.d. 3d. 4th.
,d. :I'd. • a d. ci. a s, d. s, s. s. s. s. d.
Cork 9' -0 0 -0 20'0.1-30 0 86 0 S2O 76 0 66 0 56.0
Limerick- I -51 4 - 25 6-36 0 82 C 76 0 79 0 64 0158'0
Belfast 5 -8 5- 8 S 5 01-42 01183 0 - 0 —0 - 0 0
23: °0
--- 2-90
° 1 • ° 7-6 p° o° 0° 0°
I:"
3401- ---- 610
,_2 -,23 0 98. 4 62 0 2 0 62 0 52 0
Waterford 0
TClronaieemel
Carlo* -7 - 7 - 0 Or Otllo 0 0 60 - 0
Gab:ay 44 -.1;',14i 5} 0-, 0 0 84 60^•0-U-o
SCOTCH MARKETS.
Wheat. Barley. Oats; LI
Boans. oa,,raeal.
Aberdeen
2 32 2G'
Berwick..,,--- 4.7 30
30 VI 202 7 ri
Coldstream - 45 46 29 30 25 27
Cupar 27 29 26 28 - - - -
Dumfries -- 76 79 50 60. 40 50 _ -
Dundee,,........ 28 30 26 " 28 2..6 33 21. 26
Falkirk --- 30 32 35 36' . •
- 30 33 46
Kelso 46 50 30 .33 4" - -
Kirkaldy-- 28 20 25 31 28 30 - 32 - -
Perth 27 30 27 29 24 27 26 -
M Durefkies the price is given per bushel. The other plea
above are per boll; except Oatmeal, which is per sack of 2801 b

Lord HARDWICKE presented a petition from
Montague Burgoyne, Esq. Church Warden of the
Parish of ~Sutton, in Bedfordshire, complaining. of
the immoral and licentious conduct of the Rev. Dr.
Free, the rector. The petition was read at full length,
and after detailing the several charges against that in-
dividual, aed stating that hewould neither perform the
duty himself, nor allow any one to perform it for him,
in consequence of which the Sacrament had been ad-
ministered but twice within the last 16 years, prayed
their Lordships to adopt such means as would insure
to the parishioners the benefit of
,an officiating' cler-
gyman. The Noble Lord expressed his hope
that the publicity thus given to the circum-
stances of this extraordinary case, would have a
beneficial effect, and be the means of procuring to
the parishioners those religious advantages, of which
they had been so long deprived.
The Bishop of LINCOLN said, as this petition
imputed immorality to a Clergyman of his diocese,
he- felt himself bound to make a few observations
upon it. In the first instance he thanked the
Noble Lord for drawing the attention of the House
to the circumstances in which the parish was
placed, and trusted that this would act as an induce-
ment to their Lordships to hear the appeal respect-
ing this case, which had now been so long pending
before the House. He trusted that they would hear
this appeal out of consideration to the Parish itself,
which had so long remained in a situation not less
deplorable than if it were placed in a heathen country.
(Hear.)—He trusted that their Lordships. would hear
it also for the sake of the Church of England, whose
.character
.mast suffer by the delay, and whose dis-,.
cipline must irreparably be injured by the continu-
ance of a state of things so fatal to its best
interests. It was due alike to the parishioners and
the church, that their Lordships by deciding solemnly
this appeal should declare whether in their opinion
the Statute 27 Geo. 111. applied to the offences of
the clergY. For, his own part he could hardly bring
himself for a.moment to think that the Clergy were
intended to be screened by it ; but if the statute
had in reality that effect, the sooner it was
rectified the better.—(Hear, hear.),—Their Lord-
ships must feel that it was impossible to calculate
the extent of the injury which must result to the Chutch
if it were once laid down that its Clergy were to be
screened from the effects of their immorality, merely
because a short space of eight months happened
to elapse before the institution of proceedings
against them. .He implored their Lordships to re-
form the Ecclesiastical Law, and to improve the
discipline of the Church, either by adopting the
prayer of the petition, ,or by- such other means
as their Lordships, in their wisdom, might think
fit. Three years, had. now elapsed since
the institution of the suit respecting this parish in
the Ecclesiastical Courts; and yet the proceedings
had not come to that stage when the articles. of accu-
sation could be admitted to proof. • His own opinion
was, and indeed the inference was clear from
the case to which he alluded, that the Eccle-
siastical Courts were the very worst means through
which the discipline of the Church of England
could be administered. In fact, the opinion had
gone abroad that no real discipline existed in the
Church ; and in a communication which he had
some time ago with a Dissenter, the latter said
that he liked the Church of England well
enough, only with this exception, that it had
no discipline. This
.wes. a general, impression
.among the Dissenters;9and .was in the opinion 'of
the Right Rev. Prelate the cause of their being so
numerous. He knew that he spoke the opinion of
the very highest authority on this subject, when he
stated, that our Ecclesiastical Law was in perfect
chaos, and it was high time it was reduced to order.
He deeply regretted that it had not been reformed
by him, who,. of all men living—he believed, he
might say, who ever lived—might have reformed it
most successfully, 'as he was most capable; but he
was, unfortunately,
a superiortoomuchen light,amou his own saga-
cityredofasystem
lhi:ahnpd
laeedin suchknowledge. Something, he thought, ought
to be done to shorten the proceedings, and diminish
the expences.

The petition was laid on the table.
Lord ELDON presented a petition from Coven-
try, signed by 9,600 individuals, against the Coven-
try Magistrates' Bill.

The Earl of ROSSLYN, after- somc p!fttory
remarks, said that it would be impolisible to pro-
ceed with that Bill in the irkesent Session ; he should
therefore move that the Order of the Day for the
second reading of it be discharged.
The Order was'accordingly discharged.
Lord LAUDERDALE presented several peti-
tions against the Bill from several parishes in Co-
ventry.

The Archbishop, of CANTERBURY presented
the second report of the Commissioners for Build-
ing Churches.

Lord COLCHESTER presented petition's from
the Weiglimasters in the City of Dublin against
the Bill for regulating the Irish Butter:Trade. The
petitioners prayed that they might be afforded the
opportunity of opposing it by Counsel.
Lord OWyDyR presented a petition from
Perth ag,,ainst the Malt Bill.
WAREHOUSED CORN.
The. Marquis of LANSDOWN 'presented a peti-
tion from the City of Bristol, praying that the Bill.
for allowing the warehoused Corn to come into the
home market, might pass into a kW.; •
TEST AND CORPORATION ACTS. •

.- .
The NOBLE IVIARQUIS also presented peti-
tionsat Manchester; at a place iri'Lancashire; and ata
from Congregations of Protestant Dissenters
place in Cheshire, praying far the Repeal. of the
Test and Corporation Laws.