The Sun.
London, England, 1829-02-03 00:00:00

COURT OF CHANCERY.
JR ARRI S V. stEmpte.
At the sitting of the Court this, morning, Mr.
SUGDEN resumed his reply oil this exceedingly
heavy appeal, which the Learned Counsti had, not
concluded when we left, at two o'clock.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
(SITTINGS IN BANCO.)
TIIE KING V. SEYMOUR.
Mr. COLERIDGE prayed the judgment of the Court
against the defendant, who was convicted at the
Wiltshire Assizes of an attempt to commit a narn.!less
offence. The prisoner, who is a man of large fortune,
wai brought up in custody of a country gaoler ; and
as Mr. Justice Bailey, who tried the case, was in the
hail court, Lord Tenterden refused to pass sentenck'
till another day, and the defendant was delivered nit!)
the custody of the Marshal.

--
LAW NOTICES.

COURT OF K 1
MIDDLESEX COMMON
ED?I ESDA

(NG'S 13V.IICH.
JURIES APPOINTED.
,r, rEn. 4.
Pearson v. Hunt and an-

hrweillon r. Durneste
Baillie v. Hole
Phillips v. Wyatt
Kirk v. Bashwood
Leigh v. Leigh
Pantland v, Donald
Marsden v. Winaerhourn
Sanders v. Lawton
Stott, Gent. v. Fletcher
Sharp, Gent. v. Lovesey,

other
Bernhard v. Fite Lowita
Wood and another v. Green-
wood
Beam and another v. Clark
Rookfort v. Chamberlain
Price and another v. Kerry
Jackson v. Sadler
Green v. Carr
Tomham, Clerk v. Church-
ill, Gent.
Grange and another v. Cole-

Gent.
Hills, jen. v. Omborne
Rieke v. Phillip, Gent.
Doe, dem. Owen v. Knight
Barnes v. Cropper
Edgerley v. o)mberhaeh
Bibby v. Jones, Gent.
Payne v. •Ford, Gent.
Watson v. Earl Mountmorris

man
The mama v. Wallis
Ward v. Richardson
Wooiston v. Thompson
Jones v. Downey
De Brayn v. Herbert, Gent.
Hart v. Hurst
URIES APPOINTED.
', FEB. 5.
Blurton and another v. Han-

LONDON COMMON
TITURSDA

Sadler v. Pago
Sinclair v. Bowleg
Livington v. Blyth
Spence v. Downing
Dean T. Pottinger
Bullock v. Ellington
Johngen v. Carter
Lindo v. Norcut►
Gardner v. Mew
Michell v. Jeggeturn7and an-

kinson
Doe, dem. Foundling Hos-
pital v. Plaskett
Bacon v. Douglas
Matthews v. Hamlyn, Gent.
Reeves v. Scott, Gent.
Grenville v. Peat, Knight
Rudman v. bay
Walker v. Walker
Anderson v. Gany
Drew v. Lewis
Newton and another v. Laves•
Deaoon and others v. Wyatt
Fellows v. Rowland
Ball v. Higgin, Gent.
Uwina v. Burgess
\Vigley v. Lswford

other
Bennett v. Heather
Purford v. Holl
Stanton v. Thompson
Sharpess v. Wells
Heath v. Hennell
Isaacs v. Hyman
Wallis v. Anderson
Clark and another v. Simms

The Court will eit at bi
above days.—The next Sitti.
Middlesex on Tuesday, Feb.
nesday, Feb. 11, being the 1
which days the Court will sit

tlf-past twelve on each of the
ngs at Nisi Prius will be in
10, and in London on Wed-
last appointed in Term; on
at half-past nine o'clock.

THE MARKETS,

-(TIIIS DAY.)

FISII-MARKET, BILLINGSGATE•

This morning's market was well attended by buyers,
but fish were very scarce and dear. The following were
the prices :
Prime Turbot, each 2os. Oi. to 25:8. 0,1.
Ditto small, per do.
Cod-fish, each l2 0 90 0
Soles, per three pairs
Fine Whitings, per 15... 4 0 15 0
Scale, each
Haddocks, per dozen l5 0 30 0
Brill, each
Gimlets, each
Live Flounders, per quartern
Live ECIF, per 51b.
Ihitch Plaice, per basket 3 0 7 0
Fine Lobeers, per score 45 0 50 0
Inferior ditto lO 0 20 0
Shrimps, per gallon
Fine 1 armouth Red Herrings, per hurvlred 7 0 8 0
Scotch ditto 6 0 7 0
Cod Sounds, per barrel
Pickled Herrings, per RX)
Best Common Oysters, per bushel lt 0 16 0