The Sun.
London, England, 1829-06-02 00:00:00

DIVIDLiNDS.

Joh❑ Hutcheson, Lynn, Nurfi)lk, draper, June 26, nt
len, at the Court of Commissioners.

George Bodding,ton, Gilts/mi.-street, victualler, June 23,
at ten, at tile Court of Commissioners.

Joseph Adcock, St. Mary-Axe, druggist, June 13, at
cleven, at the Court of Commissioners.

John Revans, jun. and Henry Samuel Chapman, Lon-
don, merchants, June 26, at ten, at the Court of Com-
missioners.

Thotna, Jenkins, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, cheese.
factor, June 23, at ten, at the Rain Inn, Cirencester.
. .

Benjamin Newman:ll, Cheltenham, coal-merchant, July
1, at twelve, at the loyal Hotel, Cheltenham.

Robeit Mason, Norwich, earthenwareman, June 25, at
twelve, at the White Lion Inn, Norwich.

Ellis, Seymour-street, St. Pancras, grocer,
Jur.c 9, at one, at the Court of CommiSsioners.

Samuel Chandler and Thomas William Younghusband
Collinson, Prince-street, Leicester-sqUitre, Middlesex,
grocers, June 26, at:eleven, at the Court of Commissioners.
J the Docker, Great Russell-street, Covent-garden, vic-
tualler, June 30, at eleven, at the Court of Cormnissioners.
William Henry Havilaml,, Gloucester, spirit-merchant,
June 24, at ten,. at the office of Abell and Clutterbuck,
Gloucester.

Charles King, jun., Halesworth, Suffolk, carpenter,
June 21, at eleven, at the'King's Head, Bung,ay.
Richard Miines Dickson; Chesterfield, mercer, June 26,
at twelve, at 'theAngel Inn, Chesterf•.eld.

Charles Henry Marshal!, Cheltenham, trader, July 1,
at ten, at the Royal Hotel, Cheltenham.
John Hartley, Liverpool, victualler, June 24, at eleven,
at the office of Messrs. John and James Brown, solicitors,
Liverpool. •
PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED.

Robert and Thos. Meggs, Cambridge-Heath, Hackney-
road, ship-timber dealers.
William and Charles Townend, Manchester, merchants.
Richard Lovesy and William Bryan Hartland, Newent,
Gloucestershire, surgeons.
Thomas Barnes, sem Joseph Barnes, and Thomas
Barnes, jun., Wiza-Bridge Brewery, Cumberland, brewers.
Ralph Frost and Isaac Peet, Derby, ribbon-manufac-
turers.

William Sciater, sen. and Wm. Selater,jun., Glasgow.
David Souter and George Reid, Aberdeen, druggists.
Robert Hodgso❑ and David Simpkin Bird, Manchester,
commission-agmts.

Thomas Scholes Withington, William Jars. Myers,
Thomas Crooke, and John Maclean, Liverpool.
Thomas Scholes Withington and William Jos. Myers,
Liverpool, merchants.

Charles Frederick Lebas and Jaseph Horton, Birming-
ham, engravers.

James Corner and George No Corner, Newington,
carpenters.

Richard Bullock and William Tarlington, Birmingham,
plumbers.

William 'toper and David Lewis, Bunhill-row, surgeons.
Thomas Allen and Joseph Holder, North-green Saw-

Samuel Sewell and Deane Sewell, North NlTalLam, Nor-
folk, grocers.

William Davies and John Davies, Giltspur-street, auc-
tioneers.

N. Whittock and J. T. Hinton, lithographic-printers,
Paternoster-row.

Joseph Benjamin Webb and Joseph Lewis, Orchard-
street, St. Luke'., brass-founders.

Thomas Maunder, sen. and Thomas Maunder, jun.,
Crediton, Devonshire, tanners.
Mary Newall, Henry Newsll, and John Eaton, Cleo.
bury Mortimer, Shropshire, linen-drapers.
James Chapman and Co., Liverpool, and James Breck-
anridge and Co., 'Montreal, Lower Canada, commission.-
agents.
CERTIFICATES—JunE IP.

John Eames, Angel Inn, St. Clemente, Strand, coach-
master.

Edward Cooper, Leamington Priors, Warwick, grocer.
George Sirupßon, East India-chambers, Leadenhall-
street, insurance-broker.
Archibald Morton, Archibald Redick, and Charles
Morton, Wellingborough, Northampton, bankers.

MPE ALPA II LIAM ENT

THIS EVENING.

HOUSE OF LORDS.

Lord HILL presented a petition from the inhabi-
tants of Kingston-upon-Hull, praying for a free
trade to the East Indies.

Several Bills passed through different stages.
Sir A. GRANT and others brought up three private
Bills.

Mr. GREEN and others brought up a private Bill.
Mr. Newman, Assistant Clerk at the Bridge_
house, presented accounts of the income and ex-
penditure of the Bridge-house estates of the city of
London.

On the motion of the Duke of WELLINGTON,
the accounts ivere ordered to be printed.
The Marquis of DEVONSHIRE presented a
petition from Rathmullin, in Ireland, praying that
the Fishery Counties might be continued.
The Excise Acts Amendment Bill of Scotland
and Ireland passed through a Committee.

The Friendly Society Bill passed through a Com-
mittee.

Lord ROSEBERRY moved the second reading
of the Small Debts' Bill in Scotland, and gave
notice that he should move the committal of it on
Friday, in case his Noble Friend should not be pre-
sent, who had intended to make the present motion.
• Lord CALTHORPE, on the Order of the Day
being called on, postponed the second reading of the
Anatomy Bill to Friday next. He was perfectly
satisfied that every reason that called for any legis-
lative proceeding, made it most desirable this pro-
ceeding should take place without delay. _
The Earl of MALMESBURY was desirous of
ascertaining whether it was the intention of the
Noble Lord to press this measure. forward. If it
was, he should feel it his duty to oppose it in prin-
ciple, understanding it to be his intention to press ;t
forward with all its faults, as it now existed.
The Earl of HAREWOOD did not wish to oc-
cupy the valuable time of the House; his objections
were very strong to this measure. His perfect con-
viction was, that neither this or the other House had
any right to legislate as they had done upon this
subject.
Lord SIDMOUTH presented a petition from
the inhabitants of Devon, against the Duty on
Coals. It appeared to the Noble Lord that the ob-
ject of this petition, and the grounds on which it
was presented, were correct; he should, therefore,
!rive it his full support, and requested that it might
he read at length.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE said that on a
former night he had intimated, that if his Majesty's
Ministers did not of their own accord lay before the
House such papers respecting the renewal of the
East India Company's Charter before the breaking
up of Parliament, as would enable their Lordship
by the time the House met again to have every pos-
sible information on the subject, he should feel it
his duty within a short time to move for the pro-
duction of certain documents. He therefore wanted
now to know whether it was the intention of his
Majesty's Ministers to bring forward such papers.
Lord ELLENBOROUGH had hoped before
this time to have been able, by the command of his
Majesty, to have laid before the House the papers
now referred to, but he had found them in so im-
perfect a state as to require considerable delay in
getting them properly arranged. He trusted that