The Sun.
London, England, 1820-10-11 00:00:00

[Morning Chronicle.]

The EXAMINATION of Lieut. FLYNN was con-
chided yesterday. %Vm. Carrington was then
shortly re-examined, and some progress was made
in the examivation of Lieut. flownam.—" Na-
tions," says a Ministerial Paper of yesterday,
" are hot to be brought to the verge of civil com-
motion for the sake of gratifying a petty con-
temptible turn for scandal." This, to be sure,
comes with a good grace from a Treasury Jour-
nal. They certainly ought not to be brought to
the verge of civil commotion for any such cause.
But why then has the peace, of this nation been
so rashly endangered ? Why have Ministers been
so unmindful of the great trust reposed in them
as to lend a ready ear to the tales of-scandal, in
which the proceedings against the Queen are said
to -have originated, and to attach more importance
to them than to the safety of the country ? Why,
if they have had no hand themselves in the in-
vention and propagation of these tales of scandal,
did they either form such a false estimate of their
importance, as compared with the peace
and welfare of the country, or if they enter-
tained sounder views, sacrifice their opinions on
the shrine of unworthy subserviency ? In the pre-
sent state of the representation of this country, the
responsibility of Ministers is, we know, next to a
mockery ; but if Ministerial responsibility were
any thing but a name, they ought not to be al-
lowed to shelter themselves under the-pretended
circulation of tales of scandal. It was their duty
to refuse compliance with the wishes of their
Royal Master, if they ever found such compli-
ance incompatible with the duty they owed to
their country, and to abandon their places if they
could not hold them with honour. We are taught
to believe that Govermnent is a trust for the
benefit of the people ; but it will be difficult to
shew in what manner either the people or Sove-
reign of this country could be benefited by the
late conduct of Government.

REMARKABLE COINCIDENCII.—The Ticket No.
3645, drawn on Thursday last a Prize of 10,0001.
has been a Capital in three different Lotteries,
within the last three years, viz. on the sth De-
cember, 1817, it was drawn a Prize of 20,2101.,
and then sold in Shares by Bisn ; on the 23d
March it was drawn a Prize a 2001., and then
sold in Shares by Bisn ; and on ThurAav last
this same Number was drawn a, Prize of 10,0001.
Money, and was again sold b.! Bisu. It is also
a curious circumstance, that, im a Lottery drawn
on a plan similar to the present, Where the
Blanks drawn on the first day were afterwards
re-drawn, this identical Number, haying. been
drawn a Blank on the iir3t day, was re-drawn on
the second day of the same Lottery, a Prize of
00,0001.!

The 90th Regiment, under orders for foreign
service, have embarked at Plymouth, on board
transports, for Malta.

[PRICE SEVENPENEF.

BOW-STREET, OCT. 10.

SECOND WARRANT AGAINST WM. FRANKLIN,

FOR FORGING AND TITTERING SEDITIOUS LIBELS,

About one o'clock this day Mr. Pearson ap-
peared at the Office, and applied for a warrant
against the anthor and distributor of a most in-
flammatory and seditious libel, tending to excite
disaffection and rebellion. He begged leave to
hand the bill to their Worships : it was dated hi
1818, on occasion of the Elections in Westmin-
ster and London, which returned Sir Francis
Burdett and Mr. Waithman to Parliament. After
an allusion to the execution of Brandreth and
others in Derby for High Treason, it contai•ted
these words, on which he particularly fou.rded
his application :—" Strike not at all, or strike-
home. Think of our personal insupportable ser-
vitude ; and always remember that the alterna-
tive is, liberty or a glorious grave."
Mr. Birnie {running his eye along the placard)
You don't mean to prosecute for election .squibs,
surely ?

Pearson.—l don't consider that by any
means an election squib. It was newer intended
for an election squib. It was written at the
time of a general election ; but its object was to
excite resistance to the Government by force.
Mr. Birnie.—Rave you seen this, Sir Robert ?
Sir Robert Baker.—Yes ; it is two years ago.
Mr. Pearson.—lt is, Sir Robert ; but it is one
of a series of more than thirty, which I can trace
to the same source. I take that at present, be-
cause the proof is more ready than of any of the
others.

Mr. Birnie.—ls it against the same person ?
Mr. Pearson.—lt is against the same person.

Mr. Birnie.—ls not one warrant sufficient ?

• Mr. Pearson.—l apply for this warrant, that
we may have one to proceed on, if the other
should go to another quarter.

Sir Robert baker.—Why has the proceeding
been delayed so long ?

Mr. Pearson.—Because the person could not
be found. Rewards were offered in the City for
the apprehension of the author, and a prosecu-
tion was instituted, but he could not be found.
Sir Francis Burdett, too, offered a reward for his
apprehension. Your Worships may re.c9llect the
apprehension of bill-stickers on that occasion ;
but they could not trace their employer.
Mr. Birnie.—Then you ought to apply in ire
City : we have nothing to do with it.
Mr. Pearson.—The venue of this offence is in
Middlesex, the bill was stuck up there, and I
have the bill-sticker here to prove it.
Mr. Birnie.—What is the reason you have
mentioned for getting a second warrant
Mr. Pearson.—Because the other may be sent
into the country, and I wish to have this second
warrant in case there should be occasion to use
it ►n the mean t►me.

Mr. Birnie—(To Sir Robert Baker.)--There
is no objection to granting a warrant

Sir liohert Baker.—No ; he tnay have as many
warrants as he can charge distinct offences.

Mr. Pearson produced the bill-sticker's affida-
vit.

Mr. Birnie directed Mr. Pearson and his wit-
ness to retire with the clerk, for the purpose of
making out a warrant in the usual form, which
was done accordingly.

DELIBERATE AND ATfROCIOUS MURDERS.—Z% e
have this week to record an instance of human de-
pravity and revenge', of which there is scarcely to
he found a parallel. A man, named 'William
Greentrees, was confined in our County Gaol
under a charge of horse-stealing, and on Thurs-
day last a small basket (conveyed by a car-
rier) was -received at the gaol, addressed to
this prisoner, purporting to have been sent
from his native place, lowland Castle, Hants.
This fatal package contained bacon, cheese,
apples, onions, a pair of worsted stockings, and
a small plum-pudding, highly flavoured and full
of plums. The unfortunate victim of this infer-
nal scheme, tempted by the appearance of the
pudding,immediately partook of the same, and of-
fered a portion to his fellow-prisoners ; fortu-
nately they had but just dined, and one only,
a young man named William Hearn, partook of
the deadly food. lie had 'scarcely swallowed
the 'deceitful morsel, when feeling an unusual
degree of heat arise in his throat, he immediate; y
exclahned—" I am sure there is poison in this
pudding." Greentrees, who had eaten the first
piece, now began to vomit most violently, and
Ilearn was soon affected in' a similar manner.
The surgeon instantly administered antidotes,
but so powerful were the effects of the poison,
that Greentrees, after experiencing the most ex-
cruciating agony, expired on Friday evening, and
Hearn breathed his last late on Sunday evening...
The former was 48 years of age, the latter '2l.
A small portion of the pudding was shortly after
given to a hen, which soon began to vomit, and
died in about four hours afterwards. The re-
mainder of the pudding was analyzed, and found
to contain a large quantity of arsenic. A Coro-
ner's Inquest was held yesterday at the gaol,
before 3. N. DcoLow, Esq., on the bodies of
the two unfortunate men. Verdict—" Wilful
Murder against some person or persons un-
known." We had hoped that seine evidence
would have been adduced on the inquest, so as
to afford some clue for the apprehension of the
perpetrators of this diabolical act, but nothing
came out hi the least to criminate any one, so
that at present this horrid deed remains iniolved
in the greatest r,)).
stery,-(iVaid.stone
Oct. 10.)

PARLIAMENT.

HOUSE OF LOREP3,--TUESDAY.

THE QUEEN'S DEFENCE.
[CollittuatiOn of Yesterday's Proceedings.]
The folloWing is the conclusion of the Exami-
nation of Lieutenant J 01124 FLYNN
:--
A `PEER asked- the witness whether he kept the
log-book for the oiiners -of the vessel or for
himself ? •. • - •
The Marquis of. LANSDONVIC wished the point
pf law respecting..the reception of the document
should be decided before any further examina,
tion was entered npOn. , • . •
The Loan, Cf-lAN CXLt.on. re-stated the La.w of
Evidence from Phillips's Text teak, Which was
,that the COuniel could use a paper at the same
• - moment it wai. referred to -by a. witness. As to
,the production of it as evidence,beyond mere re-
terencel—such parts of it as were not in. the hand-
writing of the witness, but in. that of ,another,
Iniist be 'proved.to have been looked over by. him
(the. Witness) and approved of at the time the
other wrote them. •
Lord ItEDESDA LE concurred in this exposition
of the law. . , .•
The witness was ,then recalled, and his exa-
mination resumed. by the Soitcyron"-GENERAL.
I wish you, Sir, to produce that paper to, .whicli
yon referred just now.
Mr. DENNIAN.--I advise Mr. Flynn not to give
it unt of his own hands.
The LORD CD AND ELEOR.—The paper must be
under the eye of the Counsel while it is referred
to by the %%itness.'
Mr. DENit tN.--.--I.can have no objection to that,
my Lord ; but it certainly must not be in my
Learned Friend's'hand.
The witness then,•laid the paper on his desk,
. before Mr. Gurney, who sat between him and
the' Solicitor-General. The latter continued to
examine as followss looking at the paper as he

Went on :
Q. What is the first entry here ?—A. The sth
December.
At what port?-At Messina.
In, what language ?—The -Italian language.
What is the next entry ?—The 16th.
Where is that at ?—At St. Van, near Calabria.
In what language?—The
What is the 4th entry ?—The 6th January.
Where ?—At Messina.
In English or Italian ?—ln Italian.
Where is the sth entry 2—On board the
Clorinde.
Is it in English or Italian ?—ln Italian.
Where is the next entry?-The 29th January.
Where is that ?—ln Syracuse.
In what language ?—ltalian.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL proceeded step by
step to follow the entries of the course of the
voyage, and the stoppages at the several ports,
all of, which were Italian.
The SoLicrron-GEytaAL.--Witness look at
the paper, and ,sty-whether from the beginning
to the end of it, there is one single, solitary entry
made in the English language.
Witness.—No, I see there is not.
Does it come down to the return to Messina ?
Yes, it does.
And every entry, from beginning to end, is in
the Italian ?—Yes ; I see it is so.
'Now look at that paper closely, and say, upon
your oath, whether any part is in your own hand
writing ?—(The witness, after, looking over the
paper, said) No, there is not.
Were you on board the Clorinde ?—Yes, I was.
Whose hand-writing is this ?—The, clerk's.
What clerk ?—Pasquielli.
Was not Pasquielli a confectioner in the ser-
'ice of her. Royal Highness the Princess of
Wales not this Pasquielli; he was ano-
ther of the same name.
Was he of the crew of the polacca ?—No, he
was not.

Was not the man who wrote it one of the crew ?
Yes, he was. -
Was. not Pasquielli on board the British ship
Lion three months ago ?—.-Yes,•he was; he went,
with me from Messina as a pilot of the coast, and
then was discharged.
What beeithe of hiM after the. return from the
long voyage do not knoW. •
What became
.of the polacca ?—I believe she
went to Naples, but I do not know, for I went
to Genoa.
, Did the crew go in her ?—I do not know, I
believe some part Ofthem might.
• Where did .Pasquielli go to ?—I believe to,
Messina.
And Pasqhielli made the memorandum for you
three months ago.; did you not say yesterday
that it was in.your hand-writing ?-1' do not. re-
member, but if I did, it was in, the cOnfusion of
the moment. •
Had you not the paper before you ?—I had it'
not in my hand at the moment when I answered.
Now, however, yott Say it was not in your
hand-writing, but that Pasquielli wrote it
Yes, by my, direction. . . •
Will you swear that this is not the hand-writ-
ing of Schiavini ?—Yes, it is Schiavini's, hand-
writing.— (Loud expressions of astonishment
throughout the House.)
The SOLICITOit-GENERAL.---I have no further
questions to ask this witness.
Re-examination by Mr. DE:ix A. 14
You are'settled in Sicily .
How longhave you been so ?—Six years. ,
When there,.are you in the habit of speaking
English or Italian ?—ltalian.
At the time you went on the voyage with, her
Royal Highness the Princess of :Wales, were you
so familiar, with the Italian as
.you now ace
Yes, more so than I am now.
The clerk , you Ply you .do not know what
•
countryman he was believe be. was an:lta-
lian, but I do not know from what part.
Did he speak 'ltalian-?HYes. •
Are you a Lieutenarit on .half-Pay of the Bri-
tish Navy ?z-•-.4.am.
Were you examined at any time before you

came to England, or w6.e any questinnsOut to.
you respecting the conduct of her Royal High.
ness ?—No.
If you had received a notice to. that effect,
could you'have brought the log-book with you
,to England ?—Yes. .
, Who copied the memorandum from the log-
book ?,-,-.P.asquielli. • ~ . . . .
You have said the paper you hold in your,
hand is the writing of Schiavini?Yes.
When did Schia'vini write iti—A few-days ago.
In what way did he write it I—By my dic-
tating, from a paper I had in my hand, which was
that written by Pasquielli.
Now, Mr. Flynn, be pleased- to carry back
your recollection, to the outward voyage; you
have.said that you,were sometimes called to at-
tend on her. Royal Highness to inform her about
the state of the weather, and other things of that
kind—when you were. called upon to wait on.
her Royal Highness in the tent, had you occasion
to pass through the room .where Bergami slept?
—I went up the ladder into• the tent. . .
What, sort of a tent was it ; was ita single or a
double tent?---.[t was a single tent.
Do you recollect the breadth of the vessel on
the beam ?—About nineteen or twenty feet.
Mr. Soucuroa-GENERAL.—" My Lords,. I
have to beg, that tbat paper about which so much
has been said, may remain in the posseision of
the Clerk of this House."
_ _ _

Mr. DENMAN begged, to observe, that neither
he nor his Learned Friend had seen that paper
before it was produced before the House, The
Learned Gentleman was proceeding, when a
loud cry of " Order, order,!" arose, and
Mr. BROUGHAM got up amid increased cries of
" Order, order !" and expressed himself to the.
following effect If it is the pleasure of this
House which is now sitting as a Court of Jus-
tice ; if it is the pleasure, I say, of this House to
suffer one side to. deal in insinuations, and not to
suffer the other to repel them, I can only say,
that if such is the pleasure of the Court, I and
my Learned Friend must of necessity submit to
their decision."

Earl GnEY rose, he said, merely to suggest to
their Lordships that it would be more decorous,
and more becoming in their Lordships, whenever
they should think the Counsel Wlere out of order, to
rise and state the objection; andnot perpetually
call out " Order," which only tended to the dis-
turbance of the proceedings.—.(Loud cries of
hear, hear!)
Mr. IYENMAN.—To which I answer that we
have never seen this paper, and, that before it is
deposited in the hands of the officer, we should
be furnished with a copy of it.
The Loan CHANCELLOR—I apprehend, after
what the witness has stated respecting this paper,
that the House has a right to have it deposited
with its Officer. Undoubtedly.it is perfectly fit
that the Counsel on all sides should have access
to it whenever they think. proper, and' be fur-
nished with copies if they think such necessary.
The paper was then handed to Mr. Cowper,
the Clerk of the House.
The witness re-called, and examined by Lord
KINGSTON.

, Q. You say you fitted up the cabin—fitted up
the Princess's cabin ?—A. Yes.
What was the width of the door?—The doors
were made to open both ways ; but believe
about three feet and a half.
What was the height ?—About six feet.
What was the depth of the cabin ?—I cannot
say precisely the depth of it ; I conceive it was
about two and a half or three feet.
Could not the bathing-tub of the Princess
have been screwed into that cabin by any means?
—No.
If both doors were open ?—No ; half of it
might have been got in, but not the whole.
Describe why if half could be got in themhole
could not.—There was not length enough in the
cabin.
What was the length of the cabin ?—As far as
I can recollect it could not have' been more than
ten feet, or ten feet and a half.
What was the length of the Princess's bath
ing-tub ?—Six feet, or nearly six feet.
Do you mean to say that a tub of six feet

length could not have been got into a cabiir ten
feet and a half long ?--There was a sofa in the
room.

Was that sofa moveable ?—lt was moveable,
but it never was moved.
Was it fastened to the side ?—lt was.
Could it not be removed ?—lt could have bee❑
removed, but it never was moved till her Ma-
jesty's disembarkation.
Are you positive it never was removed ?—I am
quite positive.
What distance wets the sofa from the door ?

About a foot and a half, or two feet at the most.
And when the doors were thrown open, the
bathing tub could not be put on one side of the
sofa ?—Certainly not.
Did you not say that the lights on deck were
put' out for fear of piracy ?—After we came from
Jaffa.
Where •did the binnacle stand ?—By the mizen-
mast,-Sir"; just before the helmsman.
Now is the binnacle all glass—all round ?
Glass.in the fore-part, but not in the after-part.
Were you not afraid of the pirates ?—The
fore-part was generally kept open ; there was a
small hole in the after-side 'also—a small hole
just sufficient for the helmsman to look at the
compass.
What side was the door into the Princess's
tent ?---T here was no door.
Where, was the entrance ?7-r-All 'round ; by
putting your hand to the lower part, you could

turn it up.
'Whe.n you went to her,Royalilighness, where
did you lift up the tent 2—The-after-part, close
theduizen-mart. ,
When you lifted it up, could you: see all over
the tent?.--,With the reflection of the light from
the'binnacle•l could.
Will you' take upon yourself to swear that
nobody was there but the Princess of Wales ?
I can.
You slept over the tiller ?—I did.

. Could you hear from yoUr"hammock voices in
:he tent of her Royal Highness ?—lf they spoke

loud. .
Did you not hear her Royal; Highness when
she called to you ; and why, were you obliged
lift uif the tent depended tpon';the weather
much whether I could hear or not.
Could Yon `shea-rtif irvo: ,peisonS.,l4te conites:f
ing in the tent ?--.NOt to know what they Were
speaking. ,
Could you hear if two persons were talking ?—.
I cOtild'keir theiriVOicei," but not what they said:
I mean, from your cot or hammock ?—I did not
always sleep in the hammock ; I slept part of the
voyage id a cabin.
And could you hear voices from the tent in
per cabin ? Yes.
Were, you ever down in the dining-room dur-
ing the night?--Not on the homeward voyage.
Did you ever see any one sleep in the dining
room at night never saw any.one there, I
know there was a bed always there for Mr. Ber-
garni, and onoplorning I saw him there.
You never saw him at night ?—I never went to
see if he was in bed, it was not my duty.
But when you went to the Princess when she
called you, you passed through his cabin ?-1
only saw him once in the morning.
But never at night ?-1 could not see him
without going. back into a retired space, out of
the straight road through the roorn.
The Earl of DONOUGIIIIIOItE.-7-YOU say the
memoranda of which you have made use here,
were .taken from a larger paper of memoranda., not
the log-book, pray are you in the habit of making
Memoranda for similar purposes ?—They were for
. my own use.
Do you always take memorandums ?—Yes, I
am usually in, the habit of znakiog them for my

own private use.
You said that you took the extracts from the
large paper for the satisfaction of your friends ;
what do you mean by that, what satisfaction did
you mean to give them ?—When I was in Sicily I
had occasion to see the public papers, and having
heard that all who had bees with her Royal
Highness would be recalled to England to give
evidence, I took these extracts for the purpose
of being able to give the information that would
be required of me.
Where did you first read that account in the
papers ?—At Messina.
When ?—About three months ago.
At the time the reports reached you, you were
about to depart from Messina was.
And then you referred to the larger paper ?
Yes.

Having, brought the larger paper for that ex
press purpose ?—Yes. ,
How long have,you been a Lieutenant in the
Navy ?--Eleven Years-,
May I ask what was the origin of the acquaint-
ance you had the,henonr to‘ierrn with this Illus-
trious Personage. who is the subject of this pro-
ceeding ?—After the siege -'of Gaeta, where I
served as a .volunteer Mote than a year, I was sent
to Rome, and thence to Naples, where I receiv-
ed private instructions to go on a secret expedi-
tion of the Neapolitan Government; to make in-
quiries after Murat, the Ex-King of Naples.—
After having spent four, nights and four days in
the woods, I gained intelligence of Murat, and I
returned to Naples, and having delivered my re.
ports to the Prince of Hesse, I returned to
Messin.
(This answer was delivered in parts, at inter-
vals, and was read over. to the House by the short-,
hand writer.)
You will perceive that 'is no answer to my
question.—At Messina I was ordered to sail to
Corfu; but before I sailed, the Leviathan, with
Captain Briggs, came in, anti Captain Briggs hav-
ing introduced me to her Royal Highness, she
offered me the command of the polacca, to ac-
company her on her voyage ; and having nothing
to do, I accepted it.
, Had you the entire command of that vessel 2
I had. '
You had the arrangement of the passengers,
had you 'not ?—I certainly had.
Did you conceive that you were the commander
of the vessel ?—I conceived every one on board,
of the, crew, were
,Subordinate to me, and were
to obey the orders which 1 gave.
While her Itoyil Highness was on board the.
polacca, was it not as much under her own con-
trout, as.if it were her own house ?—Yes.
Did 'the crew look up to her Royal Highness
for orders ?--Yes, most assuredly.
Were the places for sleeping arranged before
you'commenced the voyage ?—Yes.
In the situation the tent was placed, would
not any person on board take care not to walk
near it to disturb her Royal Highness ?—Yes,
certainly. They would not walk nearer than their
occupation or duty on board required them.
It appeared that the Queen paid for the ves-
sel, Sir, I mean no disrespect to you when I ask,
whether you received any remuneration ?—What
were you to have as a recompence for your duties
on board the polacca?—On the ship sailing from
Sicily first, there was no arrangement, but on my
arrival at Tunis,. I was allowed 2001. per annum
by her Royal- Highness; she sent me some
money, Ido not. know the exact sum ; I did ob-
ject to receiving it, because I did not serve her
from interested motives.
What sum did you receive ?-74 think 200 dol-
lars at the first time.
You thought proper after to receive the mo
ney, then 2—Yes, I was :'informed her Royal
Highness would be offended if I did not.
What did you receive, iu the' whole?---Three
sums of 200 dollarS each. _
All'this 'yon' received during the voyage ?
Yes. •

Nothing since ?—No.
Then you have received no part of the 2001.
salary ?—No.
At what places did you receive the money ?
At Tunis,,St. Jean d'Acre, and Constantinople.
How long have you been in England?—A
month.
Were yoti summoned to come and give evidence
in the Queen's favour ?—No, I was not.

DorttalAt
Did yoU believe, that yOU could give
evidence in her favour ?--1
avi came te Englat.".."o
presented myself to her Majesty, hng ue'
a voyage with her. notice°
On your voyage out you tilabk more
"
b
'-'th • ccultences on board the iolacca?A.l 7";
•-• stlvikßergatni mod on th%yoyagerAfo,
Otiy- return lAthh.goilsg,a'aireetupiiing
him hourly and momentarily.
ice he'.
Lord DONOUGHMORE—Did you ma--
to
iC
rangements for the inward voyage ; We
•
the same as in the -outward. voyage ?--1 twh"lso
Do you know where Bergami slept on
turn home do not.
How can you say, therefore, that he ut

sleep under the tent ?
Mr. 13nounn.km—My Lords, I cannot r
this question. The Learned Counsel was
0
proceeding to object to the question, Li
Duke of Clarence rose and moved, that the

sel be ordered to witbdraw.

Ly
Counsel were ordered to withdraw.
ti
The Duke of CLARENCE rose to orueolisr
said that the conduct of the 'Learned (.3qe
was not suitable to the dignity of the 11°u'n'oc
having said, " that he -would not permit the'bib
tion." lie did not pretend to say (Goa °iv
that Lords who were not Learned Lor(ls
not be stopped by Counsel ; bat he tholle
was the duty of the Counsel to treat the 'a 5,1,
with proper respect, and to ask If such of
questions ought to be put; not to say tll3t
should not.
Lord RE.DESDAtE said,it.was beneath the
nity of the If °use- to interfere. cell"
Lord ALBEMARLE said, that the Cool- a,
been interrupted whilst he was reasoning,

point.
The Loan CHANCELLOR said, in tberioi
stage of the proceedings it had been
that Counsel might interpose if Nohleoi•
shottld put anyvtestion to a witness vil%
considered to be. improper. It was certol",l'
it was the intention, of the Learned
act upon this allowance;- but, at the sanlenrd
he did not consider that it was exact'!" roci
in him to say, " I will not permit this flu
to be pat." t 0 ,0
Lord DONOUGHMORE thought their
were much indebted to the iiinstrioasPe'- o.
the gallery for his interference. At tiled'
time he did not think that the oinrom°o'rr
pression was used intentionally. It
ter
cord with the general respectful condoc`o4i
the Learned Counsel had observed &
1..1in0:
whole proceedings. What he meant !)
the witness was—" having sworn, on I° scl
rect examination, that you did not knnsca
m 5.,
Bergami had slept on the voyage hoeiffiriil
count how you are able to form a belief bef
negative as to where he did not sleep on
age homewards—that is under the tent I:t4l' ti!
Mr. BROUGHAM said, he had 50 or °yet'
felt it his painful' duty to object to Odor
which had been proposed, and he was.' I/°
claim the right of objections in the way '",„,s,
he had done ; but be would return to hl
and most agreeable phraseology, that Of°
perfect deference to their Lordships.
511
The question was now put to the iv'
answered as follows :
From being called for to the tent freere,
her Majesty, and never seeing Bergami the,'
You have stated then, in the day-tinaj,
saw Bergami sitting upon the iron bedste
der the tent ?—Yes, and other persons. t
Do you conceive, then, he did not 5164
at night, and why do you conceive so ?"--yeti
if he had been there, I must have seellied
the light from the binnacle when I enter
at night to speak to her Majesty.
Have you not said, when asked if yo aid
doubt of his sleeping there, by the tteo‘
General, that you had other things to
and could not form any Opinion ? . otif
(Here the cross-examination was
the witness.)
urge,,
Mr. BnoucinAm objected to the cool"
,
by Lord Donoughmore. The LearneLl- to
said the question assumed the witnessoo;
said what he never did say. The n'itrn
said first, that he kneW nothing about tb,es.pe
but he had' been compelled. to state' t'l
and then he said that, judging from
Bergami could not have slept there, this 4'
Lord DONOUGHMORE then proposed
lion, 46 that, according to the impress'"ce
the witness had, why did he not at
did
that belief immediately, that Bergs" .on o
sleep there, in answer to the first quest(
Solicitor-General?"
The LORD CHANCELLOR objected• ato
Lord DoNouGHMORE thenCOHSente
up the question.—( Witness called ill.).
see'
Lord DONOUGHMOILE.—YOU e
about an apprehension as to pirates
did, my Lord.
•ter
°
Repeat it.—Let the short-band wrl estil,
(Here that part of the evidence was nrioo°
When did you receive the inforo
the pirates, at Athens ?—Yes. the •
Where did you begin to take a‘lai
—After we left Jaffa.
You first received the report at
after you left Jaffa, took. the light a",,,TP
.The information being, .cotiiiriped •
er
formation, being confirmed. Ol • '
Did you ever go into the tent :'---
into the tent. rive
Where was the door of the tent •
no door to the tent. rein j
But where was the opening
opening in: front, t 5„ o s
Did you ever look into the tee .8 see •
her Royal Highness Yes, 1
!loyal Highness in'the tent.
Was she dressed'--Yes. off,
And lying on the bed Yes, Fe:
You have stated, that by the her .0
binnacle you were enabled to 'se.eir?--10`;
Highness,in
,thotent wlrejt it w 0 9.91,'01 tit cli°).
Was it the:light from the I.YittOn.te
,ares t: to" yriii;dr free'' that 'oPP.6,%,l.dsite 5
have beeir fit*. °Pi
perhaps from both.