The Sun.
London, England, 1845-04-15 00:00:00

Gentleman to use, when in oppposition, passions with which he
had teat the ,1ig,,t05! judices shush lac
disavowed.—( Renewed cheering.) When a change a
salutary change—took place, his former coadjutors were
despised (Cheers) his supporters were disregarded
(Cheers)—and the ladder by which he had risen to power
was thrown down.—( Great cheering.) That has been the
course of the Right Hon. Baronet.—( Cheers.) I will not
now go over the events of eighteen years. I will not say what
occurred in 1627 or 1829.—(Great cheering.) I will only
say that one such change was enough for one such Minister.—
( Continued cheeering.) He and those with whom he acts
return again to that course.—( Hear, hear.) I will not now go
into the circumstances, much as I regret them, by which the
Government of Lord Melbourne was overthrown. I will only
ask, was there ever a single body of men who relied on the
Right Hon. Baronet whom he has not again and again bitterly
disappointed?—(Cries of " No, no," and cheers.) Well, then,
I leave the management of this question to the landed gentry.
—(Cheers, and loud laughter.) I must refer however to this,
that the clamour which did the most injury to the G vernment
of Lord Melbourne was the cry of " No Popery."—(Cheers.)
Now, what is the statement we hear to-night from the Hon
Gentleman the Member for Donegal, that he supports the
measure upon principle, but does any man believe that if my
Noble Friend beside me had brought in this Bili,
it would not be opposed by the whole of that
Honourable Gentleman's party ?---(Loud cheers.) Four
years ago a very different Bill was brought in, the ob-
ject of which was to disfranchise the Catholics of Ireland by
tens of thousands, but the party which then supported the
Right Hon. Gentlemen represented the Bill as calculated to
do the greatest good, and to purge the House of Commons of
the minions of Popery.—(Laughter.) ‘Ve asked you to wa't—
to let it go to the next session. No, no time must he lost;
the thing must be done immediately. The change took plsee.
You have now been four years in power—you could have passed
the Bill, if you pleased, and when you pleased. Where is it
now ? It is flung away—it i 3 positively pronounced by its
author to be so destructive to the representative system that no
Government could venture to carry it on.—( Cheers ) What
have you given instead? A Bill f nt the endowment of Maynooth.
--(Great cheering.) Did any one ever see such a tour of
legerdemain ?—( Cheers and laughter.) You imposed on the
honest, hot-healed Protestants; they looked on your Bill with
delight, and see what you have given in its place.—(Cheers.)
Do you wonder, then, at the clamour that deafens you ?
(Cheers. ) Do you wonder that petitions come upon the table
as thick as snow-storms.—(Cheers.) Is it a wonder when for
the very measures of concessi n which you opposed when we
were in office, you now whip your unwilling followers to the
vote.—( Cheers and laughter. ) Is it any wonder that
those ferocious spirits whom you reused to harraas us
should now torment yourselves?—(Cries of " Hear, hear. )
Do yeu wonder that Exeter Hail sets up its bray—( Laughter)—
and that Mr. M'Neil proclaims that the priests of Baal are
feasted at the table of Jezebel?—( Great 2heering and laughter. )
If you thought that, having raised the spirit of religious ani-
mosity, you could lay it as speedily as you raised it, you will
he doomed —the day of reckoning m st still come, and that day
has now come. The Right Hon. Baronet, as a public man,
is arraigned before the House and the country, to show us
some real principle with respect to Irish affairs which has
guided you in office and opposition. Show us how, if you are
honest in 1845, you could have been honest in 1841. Ex-
plain to us h ,w after, when out of office, you goaded
Ireland into madness, in order to ingratiate yourselves with
England, you now in place turn round and throw England
into a flame, in order to ingratiate yourselves with Ireland. Let
as hear some argument showing to us that, as a Minister, you
are entitled to support which will not equally show that you
were the most factious and unprincipled Opposition that eeer
this country produced. These are my opinions respecting the
conduct of Ministers. But am I, therefore, to answer the ap-
peal of the Hon. Member for Shrewsbury, and vote against
this Bill? Not so. I believe both the Bill and the Minister to be
in our hands. The inconsistency of the Minister has certainly
produced mischief, but will that mischief be lessened if inenn-
sistency is to be displayed in this side of the House ? I admit
that this Bill in itself—and the circumstances under which it is
brought in by the Tories, or whatever they call themselves—
will produce many evils, but these evils would, in my opinion,
be doubled, if it were to he rejected by the Whigs, and, there-
fore, it seems to me it would turn the opinion of this House into
one vast shipwreck, as well as the whole public character of
England. It has, therefore, induced me to restrain
my feelings, and I have determined to give to this Bill
through all its stages my most steady support,
and to every Bill coming from the Government which may
appear to me likely to make Great Britain and Ireland a freely
united kingdom. I give such support regardless of all obloquy
and at the risk of losing my seat in Parliament. The obloquy
so raised I shall look upon as glory. My vest in Perliament I
shall resign, and coreider it no ignominious tender, feeling as-
sured that I could never lose it in a more honourable cause.
—( The Hon. Member resumed his seat amidst loud cheers. )
Mr. SHAW tenifes,,eil that he did not sufficiently diff r
from the latter part of the o'iservations made by the Right
Hon. Gentlemen as to render it. necessary for him to trouble
the House with any lengthened reply to them.—( Hea.-, hear.)
He need not, therefore, assure the House that it was his pain-
ful duty to oppose those with whom he had all along co-ope-
rated. It was truly painful to him to do so, but if he were rot
to support the amendment of the Hon. Member for Newcastle,
he should be acting contrary to the dictate; of his own con-
science. He was in Ireland when a copy of this Bill, and the
speech of his Right Hon. Friend the First ,Minister of the
Crown, was received, and he had no recollection of anything
having given more pain—such deep distress to the Protestants
of Ireland—as did both the Bill and the speech. In using
the term Protestants he did not mean the men to whom the
Right Hon. Gentleman had just alluded, and whose petition
was presented the other night by the Honourable Mem-
ber for Knaresborough. He disapproved of their language,
nor did he represent their sentiments, but he
spoke of calm, dispassionate, and reasonable men. many of
whom had all their lives been friends to the polhical equality of
their Roman Catholic brethren. Like the lion. Member for
Newark, they looked upon this grant as the first religious
endowment of the sort since the revocation of the Roman Ca-
tholic establishment in connexion with the stete. They re-
garded it as a clear indication filet henceforward Ireland was not
to be treated as an integral portion of the United Kingdom.—
( Laughter.) They regarded it as the heaviest blow that had
ever been struck either by fee or by friend to the Established
Church of Ireland. The Right Hon. Gentleman the Member for
Edinburgh first attacked the arguments of those who did not
object to the grant, but objected to its increase. He (Mr.
Shaw) was one of those. Hitherto he had looked upon the
grant with the greatest possible indifference. He thought it
a doubtful policy to continue it, but he also felt it was impos-
sible to to take it away without bringing upon many indivi-
duals whose support depended on it, very great pecuniary em.
barrassment. He however agreed with the Hon. Member for
' Newark, that no compact existed upon this subject, but he
altogether differed from those who said there was no distinc-
tion between the proposed and the past grant. On the contrary,
there was an obvious distinction. The Right Hon. Gen leman
next alluded to the objections of those who opposed the grant
on the ground of religion. Now, he would at once declare,
that he totally repudiated the doctrine of the Honourable and
Learned Member for Bath, because he did not think it was just
or right to say Parliament or the country could make no dis-
tinction between two religions. True, they did not make any
practical distinction, but unless they admitted the power of man
to make some distinction latitudinarianism would usurp
the place of the real and established religion.—( Hear, hear. )
The Hon. and Learned Gentleman said that he treated that
argument with contempt. It might be so. They had the
highest authority for saying that it was not to the scribe or the
disputant of this world that these things were made plain ; but
' this he might say, that it was sufficiently intelligent to the
moral sense of the community that their religious feeling was
violated. When he heard Englishmen at this time of the day
saying that there was no difference between truth and religion,
he would ask why was it part of the Constitution that the
reigning Sovereign of this realm must he a Protestant ? Why
was it that Protestantism was by law established in every por-
tion c f the empire ? The Hon. Member for Newark let fell an
expression the other night, that he could not understaed what was
indicated by the term Protestantism, and that there were
many who repudiated that term, He ( Mr. Shaw) would not
enter into any logical arguments with his H mourable Friend
the Member for Newark, but he thanked God that the name
of Protestantism was yet intelligible to the understanding and
dear to the hearts of Englishmen.—( Hear, hear)—and whe-
ther it be through the Romanism of ecclesiastics or the want
of fixed principles on the part of their political leaders, used
for the purpose of alienating the affections of the people of Eng-
land from the Church, and shaking their confidence in the
Government, they would forget. the true meaning and forsake
the cause of Protestantism, then in his soul he believed
that the days of England as a nation would
be numbered, and the glories of this country
departed for ever. Though they should not, for Christianity
sake, persecute for conscience sake, on the other hand they
should not encourage that which they believed to be erroneous.
He should make no objection now, if this Bill did no more than
relax the statute of mortmain. And, after all, it was only a
compact which was entered into by an Irish Parliament ; and
never tip now hail a national inconsistence been committed by
the English Government—he must, also say, a national sin—of
endowing a Catholic seminary, for the sole exclusive purpose
of teaching the Roman Catholic religion. An analogy had
been attempted, by taking the ease of a Protestant landlord
and a Roman Catholic tenant. He (Mr. Shaw) was of opinion
that a Protestant landed proprietor should give the uttnost
facility to his Roman Catholic tenant, for the free exercise
of his own religion, but he was not bound to give direct en-
couragement to that which he believed to he contradictory.
He thou„ ht he saw the Member for Roscommon in his place ;
they both d ffered in rslieion and politics, but there was no
person in whose hands he would more readily place his ho-
nour or his life. On a question of religion, however, he would
not deirive him of a single right which he ( Mr. Shaw) him-
self possessed. He ( the Member for Roscommon) said that
they should treat the Roman Catholics as they themselves
would desire to be treated, but he did not think that it would
Increase their friendship if one of them gave direct encoarage-
ment to the religion of the other, because it would snow great
incsnsistesiey and insincerity in his conduct. The first prin-
ciple which was violated was this, that while they were increasing
funds for the aid of the Roman Catholic religion, they were
diminishing the funds for the education cif the Protestants, by
making a transfer of the rates to the incomes of the clergymen.
While they were increasing the buildings of the College of
Maynooth, the Ecclesiastical Commissioners were refusing to
repair the churches for want of funds. These things were not
unobserved, and could not be unfelt ; for his own part, he was
at a loss to know what had been the inducement which had led
her Majesty's Government so to do violence to the feelings of
thousands and tens of thousands who sign the petitions which
nightly crowded the table against the Bill. He was sorry to
hear the Right Hon. Gentleman the Member for Edinburgh
describe them as mere paper and parchment. The strong feel-
ing of England and Scotland was opposed to this measure. The
Hon. Member the Secretary for Ireland stated that there were
very few petitions from Ireland. But of all the petitions
which did come from Ireland, only one which was in favour of
the Bill was that alluded to by his Hon. Friend opposite, the
Member for Perth, which came from a congregation of Dis-
senters, as a kind of token of gratitude to the Right Hon.
Baronet. The Hon. Gentleman then alluded to the quota-
tions made by the Right Hon. Gentleman the Member for
Newark from the speech of Mr. O'Connell—" Agitation, I
thank you ; the Conciliation-hall is obliged to you. Repeal
and Maynooth ought to pray for you." The Hon. Gentleman
said that this measure was chiefly important on account of the
principles which it involved. He was of the same opinion. It
had been very strongly asserted en the other side of the
House, but it was very faintly shadowed forth on the part of
her Majesty's Ministers, who had gone too far, or not
far enough. They had excited the fears and the
Protestants of Ireland, which they could not easily appease,
and they had excited the hopes of the Roman Catholics with
this Bill, which he did not believe they intended to realise.
Before he sat down, there was one other point to which he
would wish to advert. He would wish to remind the House
and the Government that they were now touching on very
tender and dangerous ground.—( Hear.) There were very few
thinking men connected with Ireland, whatever their political
opinions might be, who did not labour under the impression
that their country had long-been treated more as a colonial de-
pendency than as an integral portion of the British empire.—
( Hear, and cheers from the Opposition.) So convinced were
they of this fact, that they were all compelled to admit that
"Divide et Impere" had been the maxim by which thoy had
, long been governed.—(Cheers.) Yes, party against party had
been too long the only rule in that country.—(" Hear, hear,"
from the Opposition.) The only rule then understood
iii-
' variably was, the party of the Government against its oppo-
nents ; and its present state did not much differ, because it was
now the Government- party so divided from side to side that
it might be called the Government divided against itself,.-7,

NO
(" Hear, hear," from the Ministerial side.) But, e' late,
r had trcil by these..Nhs ought to have In.
the last to make them, to scatter the minds of such men to':
the right direetian, and distract their intellects, to such antent, that they were now almost inespacitate'd from comPs
nding the evil consequences of such a system..( Hear' hear.if
The national character of Irishmen had been deteriorated, en_
their public spirit had become almost extinct.—(,, Hear "fTt
the Opposition.) Their unpolitical interests had been lost 5113
of—their noble resources forgotten or neglected—lh'ir Pr
laws, their every public institution neglected or laid 01!_11
their position as a nation lowered, and their honour sacrieu'"
to measuros of imperial policy.—(Loud cheers from the GrPr„
sition.) Even the last remnant of royalty left them, t':'t
Lord-Lieutenant, had become so great an object of inferiorlbi
that it had nearly ceased to dazzlo—( Hear. hear)—and
Castle of Dublin was now very little better than a registretl,.
court for the behe.ts of the Home-office of this country. la
(" Hear, hear," fr.m the Ministerial benches.) Then he tc(Pri,
say let the British Government and the Imperial 1A01°1.4
beware lest they at length form the Irish nation into one at
bond of union for the expression of a general feeling of
content.—( Hear, hear.) For those reasons that be 17,,
offered, and not wishing to trespass longer on the How, "

would give this measure-his most cordial opposition.
would set
Mr. SIDNEY HER ftHAT hoped the House
the
think it presumpnaous in him, at this late hour et uid
night, if, on account of the speeches he had heard, he sho
of
endeavour to convey, in as few words as possible, his reaseho
for voting fer this measure. But he did conceive it was• bt
dory to say a few words in answer to the speech of the Rsigof
Hon. Gentleman the Member for E inburgh, and also th
not'
the Member for Dubin', on the measure now before the Hew,
and at the tenor of which lie was perfectly astoni-hed. The to
Member for Edinburgh, in his speech. which, like all et, l.„
that fell from him, was brilliant in laneuaee and posserftws
argument, had adduced many reasons which he fierabepeo, .
coEceived were reasons for passing this measure.—('`tbit
hear.) The Right Hon. Gentleman had shown that in.,
measure there was no principle involved.—(Cries of " ,r,esi
hear," from the Op, osition. ) Nothin could be more
than that such was the effect of the Right Hon. Gentlereat;
arpiment ; and if so, he would wish to know, then, he'r
measure could be called so great a violation of public Pile)
cipl,?—( Hear, hear, and laughter.) He (Mr, Herbs
could not see what there was in this measure to Cl 3
the present Government with dereliction of principle.---(1
hear.) In every year that this subject was brought fors 7.0
those who now belonged to the Government then supports The -
and if so why should they now oppose it ?—( Hear, hear.) the
Hon. Member then alluded to passages in tfie speech
t.;,
hi
Right Hon. Member for Dublin, and having quoted them,
went on to say, that the result of that had been to threw 14
Catholic interests into the hands of men who had no proper
nor nor stake in the order and tranquillity of Ireland; of
therefore, the Government had seen the necessity
nr
proposing this measure, in order to give the
tural instructors of the people an interest ,
the State, and to place the peace of Ireland on a firmer he;
The Right Hon. Gentleman behind him, who had %Tod
against the measure, had taken a course which he (Air. Siu,r,
Herbert) could not understand. While his speech bad 'lie
tainly bean against the measure proposed by Government,,,
arguments were entirely in its favour. He argued by ansp
in favour of this measure, for heshowed that other countries
;„
munificently endowed their Catholic clergy. If they w,e/
allow a grant at all, why not at once give a liberal one • tso,
knew that they had been told that night to take this as I°,ol,
iv that this measure would not have the effect antieiPleers
He was fully prepared for the next year, and the year ono
and even the succeeding year, to find that this Bill seonl,dtbst
be a successful measure, but the House must bear in mind' e$
all good laws operated at first hut slowly, although the r
might be permanent pod to the interest they were inte,ioo, •
to benefit. lie was anxious, however humble his ins
and however feeble his arguments might be considered
was anxious that whatever might be the odium, or the for
popularity, or the responsibility that attached to this tneasare'oe
geed or evil, to share in it. and for this reason alone if fern
lot •
higher, he troubled the House at that late hour of the Wile*
He was not one of those who thought with the Right! t
Gentleman, the Member for the University of Dublin. til,eniess
independent spirit of the Irish would be destroyed by the t tbe
sure of the Government. He did not know, indeed, w"tit
Right Hon. Gentleman meant by this independent 91';'li
Ireland. Surely measures calculated to give them an °lola
-duration, and to spread abroad a more liberal feeling, or
not he expected to destroy this Irish spirit. If, by an t the
pendent epirit, the Right Honourable Gentleman menu
rest
spirit of party—which unfortunately then existed to node'
degree—he would inform the Right Honourable coy
man that the Government asked for no high °. airit•
pl ment than the having destroyed this independent 11000
—( Cheers.) And such a result he thought might helots
prophesied, for no Gentleman in that House could
listened to the speeches of the Irish Member; withoe,, none
struck by the altered tone of their speeches They hear;erfee
of the party feelings, they heard none of those of
appeals to religious feelings which were the disgrace 0' "",al4
debates. He trusted that the Government "ta.
receive from Irish Gentlemen that co-operation and as'i,s„
without which the best measures would most certainnoir,
His firm conviction was, that the measure was so soun'l',,%les`
rinse and polity, and so calculsted for the good of the Pr.; )
reland, that be felt bound to give it his supports—( lie
n the rnotien of Mr. BERESFORD, the debate w°
adjourned till to-morrow. • net sse°
The Justices Clerk sod Clerks of the Peace .'":1 tole
through Committee, and vas ordered to be read thir
to-morrow.

On the motion of Mr. LYALL the following geni;o:'
were appointed a Select Committee on Commercial 313r,,00P
Mr. Lyali, Mr. Gladstone, Viscount Sandcn, Mr. (-:°4
Sir William Clay, Mr. Liddell. Mr. Ping-,am Barl,ooo
.;Tuart W.riley. Captain Gladstone, Mr. Hutt, Mr. d ter'
Baring, Mr. Ross, Mr. Denoistoun, Wawa, so
Barclay.

SMOKE PROHIBITION. OP
On the motion of Mr. MACKINNON, the Sell cotil
mittee on the Smoke Prohibition Bill was a
siting of the following Members :—Mr. Mackin aril Oa
Beckett, Viscount Newry, Mr. Brotherton, Mr• Dl7, Eger
Earl of Lincoln, Mr. Octavius Duncombe, Lord Prlajarthwit
ton, Mr. William Henry Bodkin, Mr. Ewait, N'r;lll3,.° Willig"
Mr. Hindley, Mr. Protheroe, Mr. Ricardo, and `....•
Williams. ppointe , st•

PRISONS (SCOTLAND). Committee
On the motion of Mr. EDWARD ELLICE, the Coinjr.
on Prisons (Scotland) was appointed, consisting' °f
Ellice, jun., the Lord Advocate, Mr. Home Druareli Cot'Rutherford, Mr. Forbes Mackenzie. Mr. Duncan, 511.
rlr
ming Bruce, Mr. Gibson Craig, Mr. William FerbePoottt
Loch, Mr. Henry Stuart, Mr. Patrick Stewart, Mr'
Mr. Hussey, and Mr. Aotrobus. 1301
Mr. ROBERT SCOT 1' obtained leave to bring in tern
to declare valid assignments and surrender of chattle
in real property made in certain cases.
ADJOURNMENT OF THE DEB ‘TE ON rrti
GRANT ILL.
Sir R. PEEL saidNOOTH he presumed it was understood tlicsithrfo
debate was adjourned to to-morrow (this day ), and ri°lll
precedence of the notices of motion. ti
• bi
Mr. ROUVERIE, on behalf of Mr. Ward, said be
doubt his Hon. Friend intended to give way as ragarfle
notice of motion.
Dr. BOW RING also gave way as regardod his wet°.
The House then adjourned, at Half-past Twelve.

GOAT. rars.sucET. ir
Prices per ton at the close of the market :—Au, L:5 1" t.;
15s; 13uchtle's West Hartley, 16s• Cares Hartle'
Chester M:;in, 15s 3d; Davison's West Hartley, '164;)1A,L11,'
Tanfiehl, 14s; /Listing's Hartley, 15s 9d: HolYW,e'v -
16s; Morrison's Hartley, 14s; Nelson's West Hartll4'itr,
New Taufhld, 14s 6d ; Old Pontop, 14s 6d ;
Hr
Pontop' heugh, 13s 6d ; Pontop Windsor, 14s 6d ; Pott's 'l-3,5171
14s; Shipeote, unscreened, 13s 3d; Smith's
Taylor's West Hartley, 16s ; Townley, 15s West
16s ; West Wvlam, 15s 6(.1; Wvianc, 134 33 ; 600'
Bell and Brown, 16s 6d ; Robson, 15s 6d ; Gibson, 1.7,s ;130,11',
forth, IGs 6,1; Killingwerth, 15s 6d; Walker, 155 64;95 54."
dyll's fictton, 18s 9d ; East Hettcm, 16s; Haswell, ti
Hetton, 18s 6d; Hylton, 16s; Lambton, 185; I%,?'°,isselii:
155 94; New Hettori Lyons, 163; Richmond, 16s; 'fie:
Hetton, ; Stewart's., Iss 3d; Caradoc, 183; 03,,.fr`her°":
ISs 94 ; Heugh Hall, 16s; Kelloe, 17s ; Leasil'bit 16‘y
17s 6(1; South Kelloe, 17 •, Trimdon, 17s 3d ; Barr„ecrs-el3;
Cos, ndon Tees, 16s 34; Eden Hartlepool, 17s; 1V
M•Lean's Tees um/ Witton Park, mixed, 15s • South 165;
. ,
155; Brynly hand picked, 21s; Derwentwater Hartle:2ls3(W
iart lss6d ; .langennech, 21s ; Lewiss ikfertheovr,tbert,"!-
Pow,ll's Duffryn Steam, 22s 6d West Hartley •
16s.—Ships arrived 229.

mei'

vented SpscLcles, Telescopeo,,,
'r is
t°
Glasses, Microscopes, &c. The artificial aid sol'iftes
the sight by Lenses, is One of the most valuable gfistin
rived from science, and it is indeed of vital ine:110,11"
that the adoption of Spectacles to imperfect vis,i°ll-nd
be regulated on proper principles. Messrs. .7. to °V,
bolumens, 39, Albemarle-street, Piccadilly, diret:liv7,
posite the York Hotel, having devoted their Wll,°';
to this branch of science, and their lone: e:-„Pe'
tic, have enabled them to invent Spectacle Len'es
bs
new construction, which have gained universal oPP,riec•
tion. Irnmcciiately they are placed before iT,Pr;
vi• ion, that mist and dullness which appear bebi°,,e- olo,ls •
eyes is at once removed, every onket „Merit!
1. Rrij. di:4,lloi, that the most a;.-ed, to
sight becomes bright and brilliant, and is brougrrreV:
youthful, natural and original state. Achrotualte‘,ollr
scopes, Opera Glasses, Microscopes, &c. &e., of o`Thelti
kind of Lenses to surpass arm ever invented.r r de r •
Invisible Voice Cen;luctor Sound Magnifier!, I:.:o3fofd
persomi, is not the leas, leTc,ptiole nor more
uh
barite pirce of wool in its place ; t"'; des'
rdief to old standing extreme easel °th a'f
ness.. Those valuable inventions have gall*"
qualified approbation of above 400 of the princiF4
b.u-s of the ml'dical profesion. Caution.--MeBsoci;
and B. Solomons, opticians, are not in any waY.c°-
with a person of the same name in their 110
neighbourho,d, nor in any part of the celOtir,rto
prevent mistakes be cautious, and observe, °13:10
tb
had at 39, Albemarle-strec-, Piccadilly, ePP°—
York Hotel.

faliTS H.
On the 10th inst., at Liverpool, the lady of the Ile'. Pr'
00,10
Iliff, of a son. ,090.4
On the 10th inst., at Hatnilton- terrace, St. of
ife
Mrs. Henry Troubridget
the G Wright, of a son.
On the 10th inst., arove, Old Wiadsor. the
the Rev. R. Lewis Brown, of a daughter

A
A
_ -
: , l 1 A IlaA' D
On the Sth inst., at St.l
Savionz's, Mr. With3F-riel;e"d
Evans, to Eliza, fourth daughter of the late Mr. J' - le°
Bankdde. e
a le ilib
On the Sth inst., at St. M ryl b Church, DJ' 00- '
Cook, of Duke-street, ManchesterTsequarQ, to 5°9 of
fourth daughter of W. Burchett Es . of Holborn• vo(1., r'
On the 10th inst. at Shadin 'fieldq, 'John Klin 6:,9
Bury St. Edmund's, to Anna Maria, daughter of rr.
_....„./
e'', ';'t
g
Esq. , of Shadingfield Hall, Suffolk

a Siril"6lll
DIED.
On the 29th. ult., at his residence, 150, Stria-110st i''C
Henry Chambers, Esq., Royal Marine' gervice, ""°,711..,7, oli:
last surviving son of the late William Chambers, -",,7 'dee'
years effective officer to the Hon. Board of Ordran-'
Br's
On and since; dy regretted by his family and friencl3- ear 13r-
On the 7th of February, at Winterbournei 0 t•ot
Thomas Selby, Esq., late of the Island of Meeirs• Ditrb'"
Oa the 3t:t inst., at Bedford-place, iitlghtoO9ndee • p
daughter of the late Patrick At derson s(l., °I Pc 11-1013 t
On the 4th inst, John Crossley, !Esq•, °L -113 f,144
Giles's, Buckinghamshire. - . a oval' ,
On the oth in,t., at Hove, Brighton, Di'-'9 rs`
Captain (Anal taohed), lee of thP Sist R•.gim.,nt. Geo
On the 9th inst., at Harble' down, 'Canterb'ir-C'
."
Winj'ill Buckley, E4q.
On the 10th inst., at Ward's Horse, alcUleY' 14t.
1.
Warty, Esq., aged 76.
,- o°'
On tho llth Inst., in Mary-street, HcanP"'".-,1
thins von Hoist, 86. -

./.0(

r

~!
~.
,~~

-t,

po't
Priatsrl and Pablishcd by MEET) 0,„ - tlch,
No. 'l2. :,rat,fi. Printer. 0 the
The Svn Owe°, calm g
Strand, in the Preeieot of the Savoy,
Illiddlesex, Tuesday, April 15, 1845.