The Sun.
London, England, 1829-05-18 00:00:00

FRIENDLY SOCIETIES' BILL.

Mr. PORT MAN brought up the Report on the
Friendly Societies' Bill, which was ordered to be
read a third time to-morrow.

The Six Clerks Office Bill was read a third time
and passed.
About this time the House became crowded with
Members, as well in the galleries as in the body of
the House.
Mr. HUME presented two petitions praying for
the repeal of the Corn Laws, from the inhabitants
of Kidderminster and North Grimley, in the county
of Gloucester.
The SPEAKER called on Mr. Brougham to
move the order of the day, for taking into considera.
tion the question as to Whether the Member for
Clare should be heard at the Bar or at the Table of
the House, in support of his objections to take the
oaths.
Mr. BROUGHAM—Sir, the Right Honour..
able Gentleman opposite moved the adjournment on
Friday, and I therefore think that he is entitled to
open the adjourned debate.
Mr. SUGDEN—Sir, I wish to know from the
Hon. Member opposite, what the oath was which
Daniel O'Connell, Esq., took in the office of the
Lord High Steward.
Mr. HUME—The Hon. Member can discover
that by the certificate. (Hear, hear, and laughter.)
Mr. SUGDEN, the Hon. Member must be aware
that the certificate does not afford any such informa-
tion. (Cheers from the Ministerial Benches.)
There is only one person besides himself who can
give that information and that is the Hon. Member
for Westminster, both of whom were with him upon
the occasion. The certificate only states that Daniel
O'Connell, Esq. took the oaths, but it does not
state what oaths. The word oaths is in the plural
number, but he may have only one.
Mr. HUME in answer to the Honoutable and
Learned Gentleman, said I have to inform you that
Mr. O'Connell took two oaths.—(Cheers and
laughter.)
Mr. Secretary PEEL now moved the Order of
the Day.
Mr. SUGDEN again rose and said, that
he put the question to the Honourable Me,n-
her in no ill sense ; and he must there-
fore persevere in it. Be was actuated by no
ill motives, for he considered it most material the
House should know what oaths were taken. He
was without this information or the means of obtain-
ing it, and when he applied to the Hon. Member
he declined to give it.
Mr. WYNNE said, if the Hon. Member de-
clined to give an answer, the House had no right
to compel him.
An Hon. Member, whose name we could not
hear, said it was the new oath that Mr. O'Connell
took.

The SPEAKER.—The question is whether Mr.
O'Connell is to be heard as to his objections to
taking the oaths.
Mr. Secretary PEEL—Sir, by stating my view
of the case, it may serve to shorten the debate
which is about to take place. An Honour-
able Member of this House attempted to take his
seat, and contended that he had a right to do
so upon having administered to him the Oath of
Supremacy. You, Sir, in your duty were compelled
to enforce the law according to your construction of
it. You in consequence hesitated to admit him to
his seat, and required him to take other oaths also.
You required him to take the oaths under a former
Act, but this he objected to, and claimed to take
his seat on taking the oaths passed in the present
session of Parliament. The question, Sir, is this,
whether the Hon. Member for Clare is to he heard
at all ; and if heard, whether he is to be heard at
the table or the bar. With those questions,
Sir, I will not attempt to mix up any other. I wid
postpone the ulterior question until it shall come
properly before the House to be discussed, and I
wilt address myself entirely to these three questions,
whether he is to be heard ? and, if heard, whether
at the table or the bar. Having given the best
consideration to this quest on since the adjourn-
ment on Friday, I am now of opinion that
under all the circumstances of the ease, it certainly
would be right that Mr. O'Connell should Ile heard.

Whatever, Sir, our ultimate decision may be, I think O'Connell has a right to appear at tile table; We
that decision will be more satisfactory, if we admit have precedents of one that was called to the bar, and
the object
.of it to state his case in the manner I several who were called into the House. Having the
shall bereaficr crineeive; sir, the.quesfien Hou: Member for the county of Clare at the bar,
is riot only a special, but an iedividuai one, ziiid ther4-: Will be no impeachment of his rights and privileges
fore excepted from ordinary rules. But it may as tin iiiii'Weetri Mt!ishbet. will have this advan-
tie net merely. a question of admission to privilege, tape, and which I slioUld lie hatless shottld attend it, it
but It teat' inOlee, a. dueetion of liability to penal- will tend to prevent the possibility of lifigetion else-
ties, because eitis!,tiosit retie erise. ii w %a id! of the where. Although I have no doubt whatever net My
two oaths was proper to be taken by tas Rt.4l-lon. and Learned Friend takes the correct view
dual. If he took the wrong oaths, I apprehend of tae etitt:titese in the opinion he has given that that
certainly that he will be subject to penalties would be no infrai:tieri of those statutes, yet I
in common law. He will have entitled himself cannot answer for all other Veesons taking
to take hie seat under those oaths which he the same view, and it is barely possitilt that
ought not, and will therefore lay himself open advantage might be taken of the circumstance
tp thrA.e pttialtiee seltieli may be recovered. ,by some others to give trouble to the Member for
At to the question, if it be the pleasute of the cotinty of Clare, if he were admitted to the table.
the House to hear him, whether it should be at It is poseible oleos if by possibility, a re-election of
the table or at the bar, for myself, I have no hesi- that Membet shall hereliftet Fe deemed necessary, it
Cation in saying, it would not be fitting to permit might lead him and his constituedi who Might after-
him to be heard at the table.—( Hear, hear.) I , wards return him into a question before a Cortireittee
think there is nothing in the precedents which of this House, whether or no by entering into this
entitles him to be heard argumentatively at the House, at this period, he had incurred some of the
table. Ido not know whether it is the wish of the forfeitures. Upon all these grounds, I for one cer-
Ileuse that I should ether into these precedents; hut tainly deem that the fit course for the House to take
I shall not dti ad unless the House desired me. I be- is td prefers of the two, both of which are open, that
lieve the whole precedents bearing oil this ease, of giving the Hon. Member the opportunity of being
are limited to Lord Fanshawe, the case of Sir 11. herird at the bars and therefore of adopting the
Monson, Mr. Chunley, and the case of the Conven- amendment of the Right Hon: Gentleman opposite.
tion Parliament. In addition to this there ;is also The SPEAKER then put the amendment,
the case of Mr. Archdale, the Quaker, and which was carried without opposition.
Mr. Wilkes, who was brought up in custody Mr. BROUGHAM then observed that lie
at the bar. Fanshawe, Morison, and Chum- considered it would not only be expedient to give
ley, were very peculiar cases. They were Mr. O'Connell the opportunity of being heard forth-
Members of the Convention Parliaments end with, but that the House should proceed and come
had sat in the House without having taken any to their final decision upon the question.
oaths whatever. They had never taken the oaths Mr. PEEL then made an observation in a low
before either the Lord Steward or at the table of tone of voice, which we understood to be assenting
the House. In fact it was impossible they could have to this proposi:ion.
done so, for the Oath of Allegiance was prescribed The SPEAKER now put the question, that Mr.
by King James, and therefore they could not take it. O'Connell be now called to the Bar, which was
But they sates Members of the Convention Parliament, carried unanimously.
and were parties to a Parliament declared to be good. Mr. O'CoNNELL in a few minutes made his ap-
They were sent there when an Act passed abrogats pearance at the Bar.
ing the Oath of Supremacy, and prescribing new The SPEAKER then addressed him thus :—Mr.
oaths. - The law required that after the 6th March, O'Connell, the House have resolved that you be
1689, every Member of the Convention Parliament heard at the Bar by yourself, your Counsel, or
should take the oaths of supremacy in lieu of the oaths Agents, in respect of your claim, to sit and vote in
before taken. On the second day a call of the House Parliament without taking the oath of supremacy.
was ordered, and it was noticed that several Mem- Mr. O'CONNELL then bowed and said—l am
hers were absent, and they were called upon to at- sure I cannot, Sir, be accused of any affectation
tend, and to take the oaths of supremacy and alle. when I state that I am very ignorant of the forms of
giance first, as prescribed by the Act of 'Wit- this House, I therefore require the kind in-
Liam and Mary. That was tendered to them. At dulgenee of the House; and I earnestly solicit the
the table they declined taking the oaths, alleging it ready restraint of you, Sir, if I should in any respect
was imposs;ble for them so to do. I apprehend, trespass upon the rules of the House. Sir, I claim
Sir, that the Member for Clare did expressly my right to sit and vote in Parliament as the Repre-
the same thing. The Speaker having tendered sentative of the county of Clare without taking the
to him the oath of supremacy according to his opi. Oath of Supremacy. lam ready to take the Oath
nion, and the Member having declined to take of Allegiance provided by the recent statute
it, was ordered to withdraw. Those Members did for the relief of his Majesty's Romeo Catholic
what the Member for Clare has done. They stated subjects if it be deemed necessary. I should take it
their objections, and were ordered to withdraw. But whether the House shall be of opinion that I ought
they did not address any argument to the House to take the new oath, whether lam to take bothsor
upon the subject; in my opinion they were ince- whether lam to take the latter only, I shall be con-
pable of doing so, for they were not capable of being tent to take the risk of sitting and voting in this
present until they were qualified to sit by law. The House at my own hszarp. My claim is to sit and
case of Archdale was pretty nearly the same; vote in this House. I sin returned, duly elected,
he was not a Member of the Convention Par- by the proper officer, Member for Clare. By that
liament, he was called to the table of the House, return that a great majority of the legal voters of the
the oaths were tendered to him, he declined to take county of Clare voted for my return—that return
them, and was ordered to withdraw. Ihe terms was better confirmed by a Committee of this House,
in which he signified his disinclination to take the —confirmed by the unanimous decision of that
oaths, was not the same as those of Sir 11. Monson Committee. I have therefore as good a right to sit
and Viscount Fanshawe. They were not permitted and vote in this House, according to the principles
to address any arguments to the House. Then, in of the Constitution as any of the Honourable and
the case of Mr. Wilkes, which my Right Hon. Friend Right Honourable Members by whom I am now
thought was a good foundation for thinking that the surrounded. The voice of the people has said—l
Member for Clare should be heard at the table, am the Representative of the people of the county of
Mr. Wilks was brought up in custody of the Mar- Clan, and I now stand here upon constitutional
shat of the King's Bench, arid appeared at the bar of grounds, claiming to sit and rote in this House.—
the House. But before he was examined, or any That Statute merely enjoins that Christians of every
thing passed, he desired to put this preliminary denomination shall take the oath of allegiance, which
question to the House, whether or not, as he had is more willing to take than I am. It not only
not taken the meths, and had not presented his qua- requires the subscribing to this oath, but it pro-
lifications at the table—whether he had subjected vides remedies exceedingly extensive and, awful
himself to the penalties prescribed by the' Act for the purpose of punishing those• who pre-
of Charles 11. He was ordered to withdraw ; the sume to sit without taking them—amongst those
subject was referred to the House, and their opi- is the penal sum of 5001., to which I feel it
nion delivered to him, that there was nothing in necessary here merely to advert in general ter ins, as I
the Act, which prevented him from appear- shall have to speak more largely on that subject
ing at the bar. Independently, Sir, of these 'hereafter. In that Act I find a clause, in se hich
precedents, I think the question may be fairly by a courteous use of language I am called a
left to be tried by common sense. Assuming Papist, and this clause I think worthy of som e
that the oath of Supremacy is in force accord. observation. The object of it is manifest by
ing to the decision of the law, assuming that the oath its title. It is, I think, quite plain, that as long as
of supremacy should be taken by the Member for that Act remained in force it was impossible for a
Clare, I apprehend that it would be quite impossible Catholic to sit for any county. I found a reference
for him to be present at our arguments, or that the I o that clause in one of the Statue-boooks belon2ing td
House should permit him to take part in them. The the li.btary of this House, and that Act was repealed
law subjects a Member, if he do not take the oaths in the time of William and Mary. At the period of
to heavy penalties, and I apprehend if there were the Legislature between the countries an important
doubt upon the subject, the House ought not to alteration took place in the law. By the Act of
subject itself to an infraction of the law. The rules Union, the pains and penalties against sitting with_
of the House are decided by the body of the House, out taking the oaths were taken away —(Mr. O'Con-
The object of the individual is to be heard, that ob- nell here read the clause referred to.)—This appears
ject will be equally answered by hearing him at the to me so plain, that no lawyer can controvert it,
bar as at the table. By hearing him at the bar he that no Judge can doubt its construction. It
will be exempt from 'those penalties which would is Sir, upon these grounds that 1 claim to sit and
otherwise attach to him if heard at the table. There- vote in this House. First, under Act of William
fore for his own security it will be better that that and Mary; secondly, under the Union; having
course be adopted. Under these circumstances, the taken the oaths prescribed under tha Relief
case being an individual one, resting upon the con- Bill. I am extremely! unwilling to trespass
struction of an Act of Parharlunt, 1 think it would on the patience of the House, but 1 must put it to
be right to give to the individual the privilege and you in your judicial character, shether, as I have
opportunity of stating his case by himsel, his Counsel, shown the Act of Union did not take away all the
or his agents. I should think, Sir, the public interest previous obstructions obstructions to my sitting
is greatly/concerned in taking care that we act ace and voting in this House. if I stood on that
cording tr form. Some people, I know, think these Act alone 1 should stand firmly among this assembly
matters of very little importance, and would hold of Christians and Gentlemen without any fear that
them up to r;dicule.—(Hear, hear.)—Now, my either the law of the land, or the practice of
Honourable Friend who put a question, appears this House could prevent me from doing
to have an impression that the douse of Corn. so. I come now to the next point, I mean
mons ought riot to permit Mr. O'Connell in the Relief Bill which does away the direc-
the first place to be heard. But even as to ad- lions of the Act of Union. I contend that the
mitting him to the table, I should say, that the direction to take the Oath of Supremacy is now at
custom was of admitting him to the table, at an end. If I take up this statute I find that
first, to take the oath without any certificate those directions are wholly abolished. This is a
that he had taken any before the Lord High Steward. great enactments, embracing in its operations not
The case of Mr. Archdale was a strong one; the only Catholics and Dissenters of all classes but
prima facie evidence was that he had not corn- Protestants, likewise as a representative of the
plied with the rules out of doors, and yet that people, li have a right to claim the benefit of a law
he was admitted into the House. If an individual which is common to all. I think that there is sufficient
does not take the oath before the Lord High evidence before the House that this right cannot be
Steward, he is subject to heavy penalties.' Those questioned, it requires no extraordinary effort in
oaths were for the satisfaction of the Crown. The construing this Act of Parliament.—(Hear, hear.)—
practice of requiring a ceirtiticate is not very strictly I only claim to be allowed the same as other per-
adhered to, and is only a practice of modern sons claim, for instance as the Earl of Surrey claims
times. I have taken my seat myself without to sit in this House. I contend that this Act is not
being called upon to produce the certificate intended to exclude me, and that if the 2d section
I think the course, Sir, you adopted the other even- does not aid, it certainly does not injure my rights
ing was perfectly correct, and I now think it right in this House. I claim to sit, in the exercise
to move that the Member for the county of Clare of a civil right, and which right, I humbly submit,
be heard at the bar, by himself, his counsel or agents, cannot be denied me. I have been induced to recur
in respect of his claim to sit and vote in Par- to every possible objection that may be made, be-
liament without taking the oath of supremacy. cause not being entitled to a reply, I should hare no
Mr. C. W. W. WYNNE—I really do not feel, chance of being able to meet them but by antici-
Sir, that there is any difference whatever between pation. With regard to the exceptions, I contend
the Hon. Member for the county of Clare's being the
htlieparrtelbealtidthaenytabdlnenogrerat
frtnhme bar.adni ittlinrgealnlyn do not that they do not excludecontend for me from the
rea enjoy
the Ament of
right I . I have d ct
of Parliament carefully and attentively through,
and I found no such exception in it, as affecting civil
Member, duly elected, from being heard at
rights. Whether the right to sit and vote in Par-
your table ; nor do I see any difference between
admitting him to he heard at the table, and liament be a civil right, I apprehend can
an Member of the House of Lords bein admitted hardly be disputed, for if it be not a civil right,
g
wit hin that House, being heard from the floor. I, what is it ? Blackstone makes two grand divisions
for one, therefore, shall be quite ready to concur
of rights and wrongs, and in his class of civil rights,
he places the act of sitting and voting in Parliament.
ill the motion of the Right Honourable Gentleman.
I have taken the oaths of qualification. Mine is a case
Mr. BROUGHAM—My Right Hon. Friend
that cannot be drawn intol a precedent—it can
has anticipated the few observations I had intended
never occur again, and
make
think that the
opposite in the view of the question totally ; for I
to tnake. I differ from the Right Hors. Gentleman
House will determinedvtiodumala e an Act of Outlawry
against a single (Hear, hear, hear.)
think the precedents that have been cited are
—lf it wasintendedt. Lt meet my case why
such us will bear out my first proposition,
Member of the county of Clare to be heard at. But I
that the table of this house is the right place for the have not specified ( otid cries of hear, hear.)—
:ecord, if it was. tended to exclude me by the
Ihe fact was wellnnk
intended
it was even a matter of
certainly do not now mean to contend for his being late act, who themaindividual that will now attempt
heard at the table; for in following the one line of son- construction upon it ? The
think I should be putting the House to the necessity
duct rather than the other, according to precedent; I mwords puttingof thelatewacretnagr
be henceforth diseonet? "thati„ all disabilities shall
claim, and I submit , that is what I
Intuhea(t I have general re-
of hearing a very unnecessary discussion, if were
to urge my views (which lam prepared to urge' ifgeneral enactment in my favour.—
necessary) of the grounds on which I think Mr. cital and

it is not neeessary for me absolutely to convince yo'* •
of my right, for if there is any doubt, I am entitled
to the benefit of that doubt.—(Hear, hear, Oa
cheers.)-1 strold before the House and claim a cam-
stitutional right. I have been legal:y returned t(s
sit as Member for Clare, and I feel it as an impera
tive duty to those who sent me here, to require that
the question should now be decided.—(Hear, hear.)
It was said by all those who advocated the Bill for
the relief of the Catholics, that it was to compensate
the wrongs Of an injured nation. (Hear.) But to.
deny one the civil right to which I em entitled, IS
not the way to heal those wrongs. My title to a
seat in this House is dear and distinct, and I stand
before you, and demand the benefit of the Act, ac-
cording to the true spirit anti meaning of the legis•
-
lature. (The Hon. Member sat down amidst laud'
cheering.)
A general conversation here ensued between the
Members, which lasted for several minutes, after
which
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL rose and ad-
dressed the Iltused The Hon. Member for Clare
having now withdrawn, after stating the reason
which he considers entitle him to take his seat, sod
which I must say he has done with that temper
and Rio:lei-a:ion which cnild hardly have been ex-
pected—(hear, hear.)—and in a manner that has'
done him craa, both as a man and a gentlensaa.'
(Hear, hear, and cheers.)—It now, therefore, be- •
comes our duty calmly to discuss the question, an°
I hope this will be done without any reference t°'

party feeling.
[The Hon. and Learned Member was speakivg
when we left the House.)

SOCIETY for the PROTECTION of RV.]

GIiBJS LIBERTY.

On Saterday, the 18th Annual Meeting of the
Protestant Society for the protection of Relieve°
Liberty was held at the City of London Tavern.
At eleven o'clock Lord EBILINGTON was UTlllllk
tnously called to the Chair. The room was crowd-.
ed, principally with females. The business of the!
day was opened with prayer.
The Secretary read the report, and resolution
declaratory of the principles entertained in the re".
port were then moved and agreed to.
The Rev. D. STYLES said, that when he he 4 lea
honour of addressing that meeting, he did eel'
* •
an unemancipated Dissenter; but now he stop
d free
arid regenerated, and could hold his head as hiffnkr
the proudest. Episcopalian.—(Applause.)
Rev. Gentleman concluded by moving the following.
resolution :
" That while this meeting are gratified to observe
the recognition of the principles of religious libel,'
by the Ministers of the Crown and the Britio
Senate, and the partial removal of tests and PP
scriptions, they regret to learn that still, irtiLegl
individual wrongs are inflicted that violate such free"
r
dom ; that still pecuniary claims for tolls, PO,
s
rates, and tithes, have improperly been made; ti'
still the dissenting poor have been unjustly
es
eluded from public charity ; that still riots distill"'
their worship; and that still clergymen have rej
fused to fulfil the. daties towards them, which rear
gion and the law retiaire ; and that many ,eircut''
stances have occurred to prove the necessity
this institution, to redressinjuries inflicted, and Pre'
vent evils that would else occur."
The resolution was put at.d carried .unanirnottelr
at
Mr. O'CONNELL here presented himself CO. 111
notified to
meeting, and was received with loud and reiterate
cheers.rnet
it hlaisebesheirdi Fus‘; egroltr
gentleman near me, that this is a , fit occasion
which to express my sentiments upon the ,Itsteo
aanredgpcc°
which brought me here. I have come ameng".l.
uninvited, and in my individual capacity, and .
feel that I stand here as a sort otrepresentative?'
of the talent, for of that I am incapable, but ott!F
ti,f..
feelings, the heart-warm feelings of ;the,
Ireland.—(Loud applause.)—My Lordp Ztrrai''
here in the name of my country, to return
the exertions made in our- favour brour digerati*
brethten.—(Applau4e.)--I haee come here- to .pola
out my thankfulness for the support which you bad,
given to the great cause of my countay,
of this meeting, I knew not of your fiustnerstietiN-
until I accidentally learned it in. a neiiipipti:...„_„:
read your proceedings 'with undivideel
and I came here this morning glowing with tliraltl,
for your kindness. The Hon. Gentlem'en;
some further observations, kindly thanked the MOfil:
i;ig for their attention, and shortly after.7ltrde
dt ew amidst acclamations.
ree
d'to sad.
l'he several resolutions were then ag r
Ithanis being voted to the Noble Chairman, at ~ut
o'clock' the meeting separated.

EXT,ENS EVE FIRE AT CHELSEA.
Oise of tht. most extensive, as well as destructict,'
fires th:kt hart happened in or near the Metropolis fe'
some time past took place at Chelsea vesterdal,wl2,el;
the whole of that immense pileof dorrcD°l"‘t.
and Sons' 111ot...cloth manufactory, was v
and we regret :o .state, that the circumstances, siit,
tending this dreadfu,l calamity leave no doubt c"
having been the n'ork of some wicked ante
ndiart
The tire broke out at t',vo o'clock in t he afterneetily_
and, when once igrtitit,:• was so instantaneo;
in its operations, that t‘la whole of the .uito
part of the building, whicis covers mull of
all acre of ground, sent forts, one msfe
pei
flame, which raged in the most v;err.ific 111!",,i0
possible until everything within its rang/ he►
destroyed. Such was the intensity a 17," a.
that, although the factory extends bs:t.i.,od
sixty yards back from the road, it was
almost impossible to pass along it. Mr. Dovro.'l,,a;-
jun., who lives in the neighbourhood, was soon u"-
the spot, and, with the assistance of his neighbour:
rescued forty or fifty pieces of oil :cloth...from the;
rescued
lower part of the premises. They were also enabtg,
to save the iron chest which contained their ben,•
and valuable papers. In the centre of the' builirort,
is a cistern, which contained about nine pi Pea
linseed oil; a great quantity of paint was 110,1 f
the premises, which, with the combustible'quaOlAr
all the materials used in the business, fed ilfg "0,
vowing element, so that, in twenty minutes 'l.ro,i,e,
its commencement, the fire was at its height; !tot
roof shortly after fell in, and the immense wall* '',ooo'
least sixty feet high) began to shake in the 11:,o:
frightful manner. The stables and carpenteta'l7:s2.,'
which were situated to the westward of ..,lf
ing, had caught fire, and were burning furi°l;;o
when it was recollected that four valuable tin br;
occupied the former building. As soon as' )
tbil:or
came known, several of Messrs. Downing's' :"T.,",•-ii
.
men rushed in, and happily succeeded in rea,Tcor,.
the affrighted animals, but not until one hall -or
fered, though not materially. Mr. Dowiting° •
riages were also saved. •
The premises had not been so full of Ma°. b'
tured goods for years. One pile of oil cloth n 43,,,
.ilgt/'
had been made for the Duke of Devonsbite4A' 01
worth 9001., was wholly destroyed. The tisn"-telli
was quite new, and its magnitude may be.estiauntier
when we state that the mere skeleton was. •44tbr,
between two and three years itio at an
12,000/. The loss occasioned to the firth'
fire will not be less than 30,0001., and we 10;
to add that not one shilling's worth. of it tir,
sured.
BIRTHS.
At Bombay, on the 15th of Jan. last, Lady
of a slaugter.
On the 17th inst., Mrs. James Chart, of Stren7'
common, of a son.
On the 15th Dec., at sea, ou board the East lea',
_I
Calcutta, the lady of A. Morgan, Esq., of a 00. j F
On the 15th inst., the lady of Mr. H. B. nrif'
1%
Primrose-street, of a daughter.
taro
On the 9th inst., at Clifton, the wife of Cap
Hawley, of a son.
On the 12th inst., the wife of Mr. Armstrong,
tioneer, New Bridge-street, Blackfriars; of a clasie!
..t/se

Psinvan and PUBLISKID by iil74D9
Orrin, 112, Itrahasi,

1,;