The Sun.
London, England, 1827-05-12 00:00:00

Three paid.

razz HANDICAT STALIN of SO SM. oath, 10 sous. ft.
for five-yr-old., six, and aged. Two miles.
Sir T. Stanley's Grenadier, 6 yrs, Bst. Mb.
11r. Gleave's Miller of Mansfield, 6 yrs, Bst. 141 b 2
Sir W. Wynne's Orthodox, 6 yrs, Set.
Five paid.
A Cur, value 701. in specie, the gift of the Right Hon,
Earl Grosvenor; three-yr-olds, Get. 41b. four, Sit.
five, Sat. 121 b. six and aged, gat. 21b. Heats, thrice
round.

Air. Geary's Arachne, 5 yrs
11ajor Gore's Hesperus, aged 2 2
WI-. Simpson's Young Como, 4, yrs 8 S
Ten drawn.

COCKINC.*Thu Main of Cocks between Lord Moli
ieux (Potter, feeder), and Henry Bold Houghton, Esq.
'Woodcock, feeder), for 20 tors. each main battle, 10 save.
•ach bye battle, and 500 sore. the main-31 in the main,
tad 8 byes.

LORD AIOLINELTI. M. 21. H. ➢. BOCfKTON. fII. n.
londay
Tuesday
Wednesday ... 4 0 Wednesday
charsday

A Main of Corks was fougl
tad Saturday, which was des

;ht in Shrewsbury on Friday
sided as follows:

AR. BELLYII7. H. $. Ma. 141,701% M. B.
:7riday
Saturday

fl 4

UNIVERSITY INTELLIGENCE.

6 5

Oxsoan, MAT 12.—0 n Thursday last the following
Degrees were conferred :

HACMBLOIL IN CIVIL L.

Francis Pearson Waleeby, M.A. Fellow of Linooln.
JACHFLOR. IN MEDICINE, WZTN LICENCE TO FRACTIS-E.
Thomas Heberden, Oriel.
MASTERS OF ARTS.
Rev. Peter Cotes, Scholar of Wadhaen.
Richard Michell, Wadham.
Rev. Oswald Joseph Creswell, Corpus.
Richard Sankey, Scholar of Corpus.
Rev. Robert Linge❑ Burton, Christ Church.
Brook William Bridges, Oriel.
Hon. and Rev. Henry Duncombe, All Souls.
Rev. Henry Hodgson, Magdalen.
Rev. Orlando Harnlyn Williams, Balliol,
Rev. Thomas Quarles, Exeter.
BACHELORS OF ARTS.
Richard Baker Wingfield, Christ Chitral.
Thomas Fairfax, Christ Church.
Robert Cartwright, Christ Church.
George Frederick Arthur, Trinity.
John Bell, University.
William Hind, University.
Henry Reynolds,Scbolay.
of
Jesus.
Charles Williams,
Joseph Corfe, Magdalen.

On the same day, in full Convocation, the Degree of
)octor in Divinity, by diploma, was conferred upon the
!to-. John Thomas James, M.A. and late Student of Christ
Church, who has been nominated by the King to the
11ishopric of Calcutta.

The Rev. Arthur Johnson, M.A. and Fellow of Wadhani
college, has been nominated one of the Public Examiners in
Literis Humanioribees, and Edward Field, M.A., Michel
Fellow of Queen's, an Examiner in Disciplinie llfailte-
uaticis et Physicis.
Yesterday Mr. Robert Sarrell Wood and Mr. Dennis
P:dward Jones, Commoners of Lincoln college, were elected
:•icholare of that Society.
ECCLISIAstICAL PartERMEKTS.
The Rev. James Carne, B.D. of Oriel College, in this
University, to the Vicarage of Charles, Plymouth, vacant
by the death of Dr. Hawker.
The Rev. Wm. Hutchinson, M.A. of St. Mary Hall,
the Rectory of Libley : patron, Earl of Eldon.

The Rev. W. Harrison, Master of the King's School at
Chester, to be a Minor Canon of Chester Cathedral.

The Lord Bishop of Barbadoes has appointed the Rev.
Robert Holberton, B.A. of Exeter College, (late Curate of
I:enwyn and Kea, Cornwall) one of his Lordship's Chap-
-I,lns ; and conferred on him the Rectory of St. Mary's
Church in Bridgetown, Barbadoes.

The Rev. T. Mercer, M.A. to the Rectory of Artbing-
orth, Northamptonshire, vacant by the death of the Revs
Langbam Rokeby; patron, Langham Rokeby, Esq.
The Rev. W. P. Spencer, M.A. Fellow and Assistant
Tutor of St. John's College, Cambridge, to the Rectory of
t•tarston, Norfolk, vacant by the death of the Rev. Win.
Whitear; patrons, the Earl of Suffolk and the Hon. H.
I lovrard, of Greyetoke.
The Rev. T. Baker, Rector of Stanmer.cum-Falmes,
Issex,. has been elected, by the Dean and Chapttr
(I,icliehter, a Canon Residentiary of that Cathedral, vice
the Hon. &a Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of Lincoln, dec.

The debates on the formation of the Ministry
still continue. "It is not yet formed." "It is
ill-formed."—" It originated in intrigue."—" It
is not entitled to confidence." These arc the
..harges which are brought against it. For our
own parts, we think it were better that such
charges should be repelled by the same kind of
argument by which the practical philosopher
convinced the sophist that he had legs, and that
he could move them. -We say, it were better
that the Ministry should prove its existence and
its capacity by .some important and useful acts,
than by formal reasonings upon paper ; and to
this test we
:hope the Ministry will adjust itself.
However, it may not be amiss, meanwhile, to
consider constitutionally the nature of the oppo-
sition, which is, we think, somewhat prematurely
started, particularly hs• the ultra-Royalists. They
say, and so says Lord Grey, " that if it
be the undoubted prerogative of the King to
choose: his Ministers, it is no less the right of I
Parliament to support or oppose them when
chosen." Undoubtedly, we reply, as soon as
they have begun to act as Ministers. But it is
obvious that if the opposition be retrospective—
if it commence before the new-formed Govern-
ment is put in motion—then is that Opposition
not against the Ministry, but against him who
formed it—against the King himself. To say
that the King has a right to choose his Ministry,
but to reprobate instantaneously every exercise of
that right, is, we maintain, factious ; and aims di-
rectly at the regal prerogative. Wait, if you
please, till the Ministry shall have done something,
and then the acts which you blame will be theirs :
they must bear the responsibility of them. But
while the Ministry has done nothing, while it has
enly suffered its own formation, while the person
who is placed at the head of it has merely obeyed
the call of his Sovereign,—then is the act which is
impugned, and the will which it is sought to fetter,
the act and will of the Sovereign personally. But
silTr. Canning has said, that he will oppose the re-
peal of the Test and Corporation Acts, and that he
will also oppose Parliamentary Reform. Now, it
having been among the many important objects of
Lord Grey's political life to carry those two mea-
sures, his opposition springs from a different source,
and assumes a different charaeter, from that of the
ultra-Royalists :it may he unfortunate—it may fail
of its object—(indeed his Lordship has said that he
will not press it strongly)—but it is at least a con-
stitutional opposition ; it is applied to the measures
of Ministers, as a declaration was made respecting
them from the highest ministerial authority, and
not to the recent formation of Ministry. But then
what ground remains there for those who entertain,
and always have entertained,the same opinion as Mr.
Canning respecting the above-named measures,to build
their opposition upon ? Simply that which we have
before stated—the objection to his being made Pre-
mier; that is, the objection to the power which
made him so. And in this consists the difference
between a factious and a constitutional opposition.
—lbid.

The Bill for the Amendment of the Game
Laws was lost last night, in the House of
Lords, by a majority of one (the numbers being
thirty to twenty-nine), so that the coun-
try is to suffer the unmitigated evils of these
laws for another year. After the majorities by
which the Bill was supported on its first intro•
auction into the House of Lords, it is lament-
able that, either by negligence in the details, of
the non-attendance of the friends of the mea-
sure, it should have been strangled in this ad-
vanced stage. The Earl of Eldon took a course
in the discussion quite characteristic of himself.
He seemed to disapprove of the present state of
the law—he disapproved also of the details of
the Bill for amending it—he declared that he
should be ready to correct those details, but he
voted again Ft. the re-commitment, the 'only pro-
cess which could render the correction possible.
2then told a pleasant story, voted, turned the
le, and saddled the country with the una-
mended Game Laws. This acute perception of
imperfections, for any purpose but that of re-
moving them—this sowing of doubts, and reap-
ing
of delay—this kind tender of his services,
and the care taken to prevent the possibility of
their being accepted—the episode in illustration
of the shabbiness of his coat and the goodness of
his heart, and the 'prevailing ignorance of the law—
his hints at the difficulty of distinguishing between a
true and reputed manor, with his casting vote—are
all in his true Parliamentary style—the height of the
ingeniously useless, and the agreeably mischievous.
We earnestly hope the subject may he taken up in
the next Session by some one who will be able to
obviate well-grounded and to bear down frivolous
objections. If the Earl of Eldon himself, after a
life in which he has acquired a knowledge of the
law which few men have possessed, and enjoyed
powers of improving it which have fallen to the lot
of still fewer, wishes to leave one indication on the
Statute Book of a desire to do good, he may him-
self frame a Bill for the amendment of the Game
Laws.—Morning Chronicle.

Sir Thomas Lethbridge, last night, after some
observations in his best tone, withdrew the no-
tice which he had given, as the Leader of the
Opposition in the House of Commons, of his
intention to oppose the Supplies. In doing so,
he took occasion to ask Mr. Canning a ques-
tion, which has been put also in one of the pub-
lic Papers, whether, previously to Mr. Canning
having received the King's commands to form a
Ministry, he had entered into any negociation
with the Whigs ? Mr. Canning denied that any
such negociation had taken place ; but stated
that at the time in question, he had received the
spontaneous assurances of sonic distinguished
persons of that party, that if he were placed at
the head of the Government, he Should have their
support. This, as he observed, was the very
opposite to a bargaining or negociation. It was,
in fact, an unconditional promise of support,
founded on the experience of his recent public
measures. If the parties giving these assurances
supposed at the time that some hesitation existed
on the part of Mr. Canning, as to the propriety.
of his taking the charge of the Government, the
assurances were as honourable to those who gate
as to those who received them. They_ were dic-
tated by the desire, which men of plain sense,
who entertain liberal opinions, must feel, that
Mr. Canning should not voluntarily yield before
the High Tory party, or be forcibly trampled
down by it. To hear some people talk on the
subject of the recent changes, we should imagine
that the chief object in politics was not to repress

Mr. Peel, we see, is extremely anxious to separate
himself and his character from the Opposition. As
he has a character to lose, this is wise. He will
not march through Coventry at their head, though
Sir Joseph Yorke declared his readiness to follow
him.—lbid.

Among all persons who still set some value
on an honest consistency of purpose in public
men, and who respect a manly conduct more
than they admire finesse, there can be but one
opinion with regard to the speech of Earl Grey.
In the midst of the extensive and shamefhl dere-
liction of principle among that party called the
Whigs, which we have witnessed, it prevents our
confidence in human nature from being quite
destroyed, to observe one such example of in-
flexible good sense and uncompromising virtue—
not that we ever placed a great deal of reliance
on the public integrity of many of the indi-
viduals, who, under the pretence of extreme
patriotism, have, on more occasions than one,
excited the popular spirit only to betray it; but
we confess we were not prepared. for such a de-
sertion en masse from all principles and solemn
pledges ever given, as the Whigs have just now
been guilty of._ TlThe faithless lover, who for a
richer bride abandons the mistress of la long
affections, after the wedding-garments had been
made, is not more perjured and contemptible
than those champions of freedom who, at the
beckoning of Mr. Canning's finger, forsook the
public whom they cajoled, for the hollow em-
braces of a Minister, who had always held them
up to scorn In reference to such a transac-
tion, the speech of Earl Grey is an invaluable
document. Coming from so high and unques-
tionable an authority among the Whigs them-
selves, and with the additional enforcement, that
it was spoken against his own interests, in the
sense that vulgar minds understand that term, it
must have great weight with the public. It will
also guide the historian in giving, at a future
day, its proper character to the base and unna-
tural coalition which has called forth the ful-
some praises of almost the whole of the daily
press, while it is viewed only with a feeling of
astonishment and disgust by every honest and sen-
sible man in the community. The temperance of
manner with which Earl Grey spoke must give
additional value to the energy of his sentiments.
What a contrast to the speech of Lord Goderich
did not this candid exposition of the Noble Earl's
principles and feelings present ; yet for Lord
Goderich, under the name of Mr. Robinson,
we entertained great respect, as a frank and in-
genuous debater. But on this occasion he was
tricky and evasive. He neither dared to an-
swer in the affirmative the quesion put to him,
as to whether the Govermnent was a provisional
one, nor did he dare to deny it ; hut, to use a
vulgar idiom, he " beat about the bush," and
left his auditory just as wise as when he began.
This was very unlike the manly sort of fighting
which he promised a few nights before, when he
said all that he wanted was " a clear stage and
no favour ;" but a man does not require a
" clear stage" for the purpose of avoiding his
antagonist. He can do that without putting
people to the trouble of " beating out a ring."
Not so the conduct of Lord Grey ; he relied not
on tactics, but on principle. He stood up to
the subject with the fearless front of conscious
honesty ; and, however we may differ with the
Noble Earl on certain political questions; we
can have no feeling but one of the highest re-
spect for the moral independence of character
which he exhibited. In the retrospect which he
took of his own public career and that of Mr. Can-
ning, what a contrast presented itself ! For he
did not, like the recreant Whigs, endeavour to draw
a veil over the past, having no inconsistencies to
disguise—no treachery to conceal. He alluded
to the pledges which he had given to the public
in 1807, 1810, and 1812 ; and he could do so
with safety, for he had not violated them. Can
Sir Francis Burdett or Mr. Tierney do the
same ? Does the latter recollect the pledge
which he gave, as acknowledged Leader of the
Opposition, in the month of January, 1821, on
the occasion of the memorable vote of censure
which the Marquis of Tavistock moved against
Ministers, in consequence of the proceed-
ings relative to the Queen ? Does he forget
that he then pledged himself never to accept
of office, unless he could effect such a
change of ,system as would make his principles
triumphant—such a change as would enable him to
carry the Catholic question, the question of a mode-
rate Reform, and the repeal of whatever remained
on the Statute-book of the Six Acts ? Does the
former recollect the declaration which he made at
the Wiltshire Meeting, in the same month and year,
when he said that, for his part, he gloried in the
name of a Radical Reformer, and that what he
wanted was a " radical change of system, and to tear
up corruption by the roots ?" Who can wonder
that Earl Grey shrinks from the idea of having his
name connected in the same disreputable page of
history with men whose former professions are as
easily forgotten as Mr. Canning can forget his
former friends ? The clear and admirable exposure
which the Noble Earl made of the shuffling and in-
consistent foreign policy of Mr. Canning, and the
refutation which he gave to his assumption of
" having called the new world into existence," as
put forth in his bombastic boast in his notorious
speech on Portugal, must for ever silence those
flatterers of the Premier who are not lost to all
sense of shame in their adulation. Was there ever
a greater instance of political duplicity than Mr.
Canning stating to the Spanish Minister in 1823,
that the acknowledgment of the independence of

" Sir Harcourt Lees has called at our Office, and re-
quested us to state, that he immediately leives town for
England, to stir up its loyal Protestants to petition his
Majesty for the removal of Mr. Canning !! ! We also un-
derstand the worthy Baronet to complain bitterly of the
conduct of a cotemporary, which he formerly fostered, but
which he has, like most other Protestants, abandoned, re-
fusing to publish his articles, or to return his manuscripts."
—Dublin Patriot.

How is this fearful evil to be averted ? One
course only suggests itself, on the spur of the
moment,—a desperate one, we allow—but jus-
tified by the emergency of the case. Let the Habeas
Corpus Act be immediately suspended ; and when
Sir Harcourt arrives in this country, clap him into
the nearest county jail by virtue of a warrant from
the Secretary of State for the Home Department.
When he is once secured, there will he leisure to
determine what shall be afterwards done with him :
meanwhile, however, Mr. Canning will have no-
thing tQ fez,r.—New Times.

The speech of Thomas Lethbridge last
night, in the House of Commons, when com-
pai cd with his preceding denunciation, reminds
us of the old proverb, as applied to the month
of March, that "it comes in like a lion, and
goes out like a lamb." The Hon. Baronet
began by declaring his intention of exercising
one of the most important functions of a Legis-
lator, that of endeavouring to persuade the
House to stop the customary supplies granted
to the Crown ; and he ended by asking two very
civil questions of die Right Hon. Gentleman at
the head of the Government. In one of these
questions he was superseded—or, rather, the
expediency of answering it was superseded—by
a notice of motion previously given by the Hon.
Member for Stafford, (Mr. Beaumont) ; the
object of which motion was, to bring on one
general discussion, embracing all those various
subjects connected with the dissolution of
the late Cabinet. Mr. Canning emphatically
acknowledged his obligations to the Honourable
Member for the manly and straight-forward
course he had pursued ; inasmuch as it would
put an end to that system of petty war-
fare, which has been carried on, during the last fort.
night. With respect to the second query of the
Hon. Baronet, referring to some alleged clandestine
negociations between Mr. Canning and the heads of
the party, who now give him their support, antece-
dently to the resignations, of his late Colleagues,
and which negociations, it was rumoured, were
kept a profound secret both from the King and from
his seceding Ministers, we cannot do better than
refer our Readers to the brief, but satisfactory and
triumphant, explanation given by Mr. Canning him-
self. It does not appear that Mr. Beaumont spe-
cified any particular day for bringing forward his
motion, to ascertain whether the existing Mini-
sterial arrangements are permanent or merely pro-
visional; but as Mr. Canning distinctly expressed
his determination not to be induced either by taunts
or direct charges, to say one word further upon the
subject, until that motion was regularly before the
House, we may conclude that we shall witness no more
of those " disgusting proceedings," to use the words_
of the Right Hon. Gentleman, which have lately
occurred.—lbid.

CIRCUITS OF THE COMMISSIONERS
FOR RELIEF OF INSOLVENT DEBTORS.

SUMMER CIRCUITS, 1627.
SOUTHERN CIRCUIT.
11. R. RErNot.ns, Esq. Chief Commissioner.
Berkshire—Reading, Tuesday, June 19.
Oxfordshire—Oxford and City, Wednesday, June 20.
Gloucestershire—Gloucester and City, Friday, June 22.
`Worcestershire—Worcester and City, Monday, June 25.
Herefordshire—Hereford, Wednesday, June 27.
Monmouthshire—Monmouth, Friday, June 29.
Monmouthshireßristol, Monday, July-2.
Somersetshire—Bath, Wednesday, July 4.
Somersetshire—Taunton, Friday, July 6.
Cornwall—Bodmin, Thursday, July 12.
Devonshire—Plymouth, Saturday, July 14.
Devonshire—Exeter and City, Monday, July 16.
Dorsetshire—Dorehester, Thursday, July 19.
Wiltshire—Salisbury, Saturday, July 21.
Hampshire—Southampton, Monday, J"ly 23.
Hampshire—Winchester, Tuesday, July 24.
Sussex—Horsham, Thursday, .luly 2(i.
Kent—Maidstone, Saturday, July 2S.
Kent—Dover, Tuesday, July 31.

VOLTHERN CIRCUIT.
T. B. BOWEN, Esq. Commissioner.
Rutlandshire—Oakham, Monday, July 11.
Derbyshire—Derby, Tuesday, June 12.
Nottinghainshire—Nottingham and Town, Wednesday,
June 13.
Lincolnshire—Lincoln and City, Saturday, June 16.
Yorkshire—Wakefield, Tuesday, June 19.
Yorkshire—Kingston-upon-Hull, Monday, June 25.
Yorkshire—York and City, Wednesday, June 27.
Cheshire—Chester and City, Monday, July 2.
Lancashire—Liverpool, Wednesday, July 4.
Lancashire—Lancaster, Saturday, July 7.
Westmorland—Kendal, Monday, July 16.
Yorkshire—Richmond, Wednesday, July IS.
Durham--Durham, Friday, July 20.
Northumberland—Newcastle-upon-Tyne and Town, Mon-
day, July 23.
Cumberland—Carlisle, Wednesday, July 25.

MIDLAND CIRCUIT.
W. J. Law, Esq. Commissioner.
Hertfordshire—Hertford, Friday, July 6.
Essex—Chelmsford, Saturday, July 7.
Essex—Colchester, Monday, July 9.
Suffolk—lpswich, Tuesday, July 10.
Norfolk—Yarmouth, Thursday, July 12.
Norfolk—Norwich and City, Friday, July 13.
Norfolk—Lynn, Monday, July 16.
Cambridgeshire—Ely, Tuesday, July 17.
Suffolk—Bury St. Edmunds, Wednesday, July IS.
Cambridgeshire—Cambridge, Friday, July 20.
Huntingdonshire—Huutingdon, Saturday, July 21.
Northamptonshire—Peterborough, Monday, July 23.
Leicestershire—Leicester, Tuesday, July 24,
Staffordshire—Litchfield, Thursday, July 26.
Staffordshire—Stafford, Friday, July 27.
Shropshire—Shrewsbury, Monday, July 30.
Warwickshire—Coventry, Wednesday, Aug. I.
Warwickshire—Warwick, Thursday, Aug. 2.
Northamptonshire—Northampton, Monday, Aug. 6.
Bedfordshire—Bedford, Wednesday, Aug. S.
Buckingham—Aylesbury, Thursday, Aug. 9.

H. Meyer, Louth, Lincoln, cabinet-maker, May 14, 15,
and June 22, at eleven, at the Dog and Duck Tavern, Hull.
Willis, Watson, Bower, and Willis, Tokenhouse-yard, Loth-
bury; nr \Volley, Hull.
W. Youell, Cranbrook, Kent, brewer, May 19,- 21, and
June 22, at eleven, at the George, Cranbrook. Dyne,
Lincoln's-Inn-fields; or Willis, Cranbrook.

H. Kimber, Gloucester, dealer and chapman, May 31,
June 1, and 22, at eleven, at the Guildhall, Worcester.
Parker and Smith, Worcester ; or Cardale, Buxton, and
Newton, Holborn-court, Gray's-inn.
J. Jellicorse, Manchester, Lancaster, warehouseman,
May 24, 26, and June 22, at eleven, at White's Hotel,
Manchester. Ellis, Sons, and Co., Chancery-lane; and
Higson, Bagshaw, anil Co. Manchester.
R. Cooper, Ledbury, innkeeper, May 6,7, and June
22, at eleven, at the Feathers, Ledbury. Clarke, and Co.
Chancery-lane ; and Higgins, Ledbury.
J. Mitchell, Lockwood, Aldmondbury, York, cloth ier,
May 21, 25, and June 22, at eleven, at the Court House,
Huddersfield. Wiltshire and Fenton, Winchester-house,
Old Broad-street ; or Fenton, Huddersfield.
J. Weddle, Sutton, Yorkshire, paint-manufacturer,
May 16, 17, and June 22, at eleven, at the I)og and
Duck Tavern, Kingston-upon-Hull. Rosser and Son,
Gray's Inn-place, Holborn ; and Frost, Hull.

J. Eccles, Wednesbury, Stafford, victualler, May 18, at
seven, 19, and June 22, at ten, at the Littleton's Arms
Inn, Penkridge, Stafford. Wheeler and Bennett, John-
street, Bedford-row ; and Smith, Walsall, Staffordshire.

T. Harris, Ilillcott Inn, Newent, Gloucester, innkeeper,
May 28, at six, 29, and June 22, at ten, at the Fleece Inn,
Gloucester. Watson and Broughton, Falcon-square; and
C. Smallridge, Gloucester.
J. Davis, Devonshire-street, Queen-square, surgeon,
May 18, 25, at ten, and June 22, at nine, at the Court of
Commissioners. G. Score, Lincoln's Inn-fields.

W. M`Niell the elder, Charles-street, Middlesex Hospital,
coach-maker, May 18, 25, at eleven, and June 22, at
twelve, at the Court of Commissioners. T. W. Pinero,
Charles-street, 31idd1esex Mos-pital.
T. Obee, Weymouth-street, Marylehone, carpenter, May
18, 25, and June 22, at eleven, at the Court of Commis-
sioners. Jones and Bland, Great Marylebone-street.
E. Mincher, Birmingham, victualler, May 16, 17, June
22, at twelve, at the Royal Hotel Birmingham. Hulnie,
Frampton, and Co. New Inn; and Parker and Timmins,
Birmingham.

J. Roberts, Minchinhampton, surgeon, May IS, at eleven
and 25, at ten, and June 22 at nine, at the Court of Com-
missioner. Cornthwaite, Doctor's Commons.
DIVIDENDS.
H. Lewis, Bridguorth, Shropshire, innkeeper, June 1,
at twelve, at the Castle Inn, Bridgnortli—.l, Pearce and
J. Perry, Nottingham, lace-manufacturers, June 1, e.t ten,
at the Black Moor's Head Inn, Nottingham—T. Bowen,
Lynn, Norfolk, linen-draper, June 29, at eleven, at the
Court of Corutnissioners—W. Curtis, Sloane-street, linen-
draper, June 29, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners
—W. Huntriss, Northouram, Halifax, cotton-spinner,
June 14, at eleven, at the Union Cross Inn, Halifax- -J.
Thomas, King-Stanley, Gloucestershire, clothier, June I,
at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners—J. Beckley, Old
Fish-street, wine-Merchant, June 1, at twelve, at the Court
of Commissioners—W. Eiger, Maidstone, grocer, June 1,
at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners---T. and E. S.
Foster, Yalrling, Kent, maltsters, May 29, at eleven, at the
Court of Commissioners—J. Docker, Great Russell-street,
Covent-garden, victualler, June 1, at eleven, at the Court
of Commissioners—R. Weaver, Plymouth, linen-draper,
June 1, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners—J, Bowers,
East-street, Spitalfields-market, victualler, June 1, at
eleven, at the Court of Commissioners—R. Edie, Broad-
, street, merchant, June 1, at twelve, at the Court of Com-
missioners—S. Bulgier, Oxford-street, woollen-draper,
June 1, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners—J. I'. Lam-
bert, Chalford, Gloucestershire, clothier, June 5, at eleven,
at the George Inn, Stroud, Gloucestershire—J. Trobridge,
Exeter, victualler, June 4, at eleven, at the Globe Tavern,
Exeter--T, W. Williams, Northwich, hanker, June 4, at
eleven, at the Crown Inn, Northwich—J. Hughes, E. North,
and E. Hughes, Mobberly, Cheshire, cotton-spinners, May
SI, at nine, at White's Hotel, Manchester—G.
Bradford, Wilts, clothier, June 5, at ten, at the White
Lion Inn, Bath—P. Warren,Warrninster, nualman, June 2,
at twelve, at the Angel Inn, Warminster—W. Horn and
It Jackson, Southwark, rectifying distillers, June 1, at
eleven, at the Court of Commissioners—J. Wilkins,
Warminster, corn factor, June 2, at one, at the Angel Inn,
Warminster—G. Noah, Pall-mall, tailor, June 1, at eleven,
at the Court of Commissioners—G. Scott, Houghton-le-
`piing, Durham, inanucacturer of earthenware, Jur r 2, at
eleven, at the Queen's Head Inn, Durham-3. Lund, Dut-
ton, Lancashire, factor, July 9, at ten, at the Hotel, Black-
burn—J. Ruez de Alzedo, Bank-buildings, merchant, June
1, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners--C. Ince,
Craven-street, wine merchant, June 1, at eleven, at the
Court of Commissioners—J. llill, Paternoster-row, prin-
ter, June 1, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners—J.
Pearson, Walworth, July 17, at ten, at the Court of Corn-
►nissiouers—J. Read, Regent-street, linen draper, July 27,
at one, at the Court of Commissioners—C. Hill, Taunton,
linen-draper, June 1, at eleven, at the Court of Commis- i
"loners.