The Sun.
London, England, 1820-12-22 00:00:00

LAW INTELLICIRINiCE.

couRT 0? c}I.ANcERY, ncc.2l.
lASTEILSI-11.1) OF Qt3r,F.l'S" COLLEGE..
Mr. IV wrfiEtitui, ;stated that it was the wish of the Tallies
that the Petition in this ease inizlit be he:ird on the day after
the'next seal, if it met with his Lordship's approbation.
The Luau CutAtiqKLLOR---" I will hear it on whatever day
the parties may appoint. A' the cast has been mentioned to
tne%l may as well corrvdt a mistete that has One abroad: • I
have received attanonymotts letter, purporting to come front
Catithridge, and • eviacntly written in a fictitious ham!, sup-
posing. that 1 have the appointment of the. Ntister. The wri-
ter is roistahen, for it is oat vested in me; the case- does'ttot
come before me as,Visiror of th, College, because his Majesty
is the Visitor, and the appointment is ve'sted its the Crown,
and by the Crown disposed of with the advice of the Council ;
(,oral Chancelliit, liare not even the recommendation.
I Itre said so much to vase the minds 'of those who ate so
fretted, afraid I should: do wrong."
TII EARL OF SHAFTESBURY V. VIE DUKE OF MARL—

BOROVipli.
This cause was again lironOtt before the Lord Chancellor
by Mr. Shadwell, Who notited, the postponement that hail
taken place for the purpose of basin!,: an affidavit of the stuff
the;Duke was entitled to, made, wlich has already beet] laid
before our readers.
Mr. Wuay called the ottention,of his Lordship to the,,ali-
davit of Mr. PennelE.er, and Another person, who .had ahlo
se.airn in support of Ihe ease of hi's noble cli,nt.
- The Loan CnANcELLoti.—flas the Duke made an affitl,Ait
that he has not encumbered) these, reins? After sos,÷=-,slisei-
tations from Mr. Shathrell, his Lordship said, that it would
be Drevsfary that lA's Gr,ice should malse an affidavit that he
had not tt,“igned or encumbered the property in question.
At ;present it was merely stated that the DuLe of Marlborouch
was entitl.ed to the rents-;: but that fact, sqing
• thipK, as any I,rson mig;ht come bOhe Coiirt to-morrow, and
say,;!bat lie bed >ut assignment of the property that was now
Ott subject of dispute. Surely, said his Lordship, his Grace
Carl have no abjection to nialsing an affidavit as to the interest
he has in thit tuth,or whether helots or has not made an as-
signment of it.
Mr. WRAY undertoook to, make an affidavit by the next
seal, if the proceedings were allowed to be stayed until that

•
time.
Nit.. SIIADWELL said the real question here was, tbether the
-Clt.Ftcs.shotild t,r 'shonlif not he discban!ed ? .
The Loan CIIANCELI.Mt said hr Wott!ii [Mt discharge the
order he had made ; :krol aftcs , some farther conversation,
the east was ot (lured to stand until the next seal day.

COURT OF KING'S BENrH, DEC. 91.
110TnwttL, AND ANOTHER V. DEMAINE.,
this was an action on a Pail Bond given be the defendant
ti, the late Sheriffs of London, to which the defendant pleaded
infancy. •
It appeared in er.idenee,,that the defendant had been in
business for himself as cc Manchester Warehouseman 'for a
year, and that he Was a remarkably tall young man, and had
all the appearance of full age. In support ol'his plea of in-
fancy, however, •he called a Tip-I:shirt cousin, who T einem-
bered him when b,r was only three months old,. and be al“)
produced the register of his bith, by which it appeared. that
• tie was in a state of infancy when he executed the Bail liond.
.The• Jory, under the Learned Judge's directions, found •for
the defendant. ". •
gANDEItSO AND :OTHERS— ASSIGNEES OF PRO-
, .

BERT, J. GREGG.
. .
This was an action of troeer by ?t,,s,...necs of a Bankrupt,
wine merchant, to reeover a ef rtain tinawity of wine, alleged
to have been :'old to the defendant, a retired•balter, atter
bankruptcy. ;
Bnonotiam was for the plaintiff, and Mr. SCARLET!'
for the defendant.
There wa* nothing of public interest in the case. The
plaintiffs made not their claim,. in the opinion; of the Learned
Judge,•to the sum of 8.21. 14s. for %\bich'the Jury found their
verdict.