The Sun.
London, England, 1827-12-19 00:00:00

tending to act dishonestly. On the part of the cir
withnfeenvdearotisn,tehneded
toou t
dhesitatioon t
icloe
suel dbsoaoyk,st
obra
t t
otherwise than in a tradesman like way, but as,
~,sll
same time they could not consent to having an 'PF
tation cast on them:
Mr. HORNE was willing not to press the teta':„
to their manner of disposing of the property' rof
.vided they undertook to keep a regular accoaor
the sales.
Mr. IIs:ALD objected to their being placed
any terms whatever. His clients had given (
full value for the property, . and the hest it
would be the amount for which it 5' •
They would, _therefore, for their own c
keep 'a regular account; besides the bill did
impute to them any intention of *king other.,%
The property to which the application. had reffr?
was now in their hands for six months; :.tgo
been sold to them by the assignees, wil° (11

now object to the sale,
Mr. HORNS.—That's the whole uesticll
Mr. Twiss followed on the same Side' iv-
Heald. before s'
Mr. HORNE, after urging the topics
vanced by him, begged to add one woviil'al":fite
to Mr. Heald's assertion,
the transacti
that the defer-1130°,01i
bong fide purchasers
,
sale from A. to 8., made in a public tila
It was no such thing; the defendants bad 1161114
agents to the creditors and assignees of Messo' fe
and Robinson, and the bill charged, that these 'ef oe
ants, being employed to Value the proper
bankrupts, contrived to turn theinselves,"ll,d3
sort of contract between them and a portion ;tr.
assignees, into purchasers of that very PrOme
not by public sale, but by private arrant'
The bill charged them with doing* so; they
goo4rj.'HidEgeAsrmofobtjheecte'adiuteo
of
his thfi .
the
OS. wit M .
Mr. RNE said, that his statemeot .dt!
eie pnrdos ent KperrY•eriog
in answer to the assertion made on the °t"h
e„rt
one of his friend's clients was in fact fl"
Mr. Twiss was understood to deny.
allegation. of
After some
said discussion, r
the Mars.
siSgnUeGeDsr
Messrsthat
011n1 evlplep ealtorded .4)t.OelY'
strevo,
who were disposed to take such part ill the if
action as they should think the evidence. nttb'
them in doing. Tim, woull not appear arg o o,ot
defendants, unless there should appear. t° bho'lglit
unfair dealing. The Learned Gentlemanm tie; i
the proposition of Mr. Hoe quite reasoflaufliiej
was idle to talk of imputation,.as the bill itselPf
the imputation ; and until the Court disposed°
question an account ought to he kept. ,5 We
The VICErCHANCELLOR said that when t°l4etl`t
ter was last before him, the defendants eve
to stand over, and as they asked for an iduogitie,
it but right they should submit to bein,gh'.
under terms. The parties had complied' "t-dr
terms,'and their affidavits were filed on the POP' 00
True it was that some of these affidavit s bad been sbioi
so far back as the 4th of December, bat ;
of his order, was that the defendants, by ba"cls 1,13
theihtiloaledwirtaii.eftileqdtillayi:,:ostniiiimlpeledi:abyllvvili
itei tlh3histehoor:%d,oDeurectdonberf
have their whole case made out by that (101' ifito
without.placing the defendants under attliirt3elF'rt:;"s.l::
Mr. HEALO—NOW that the Court fetuses to P., e
my client under terms, I have on their rt°00!;
satnadte,dtoliaatllthtelynttwtilhlevyolciontiitladribly e keepreq,iiretdlie to
their own accord. •
The VICE-CHANCELLOR—I impose no t£1015)
After
a I -ong conversation between Couriseue,l3
both sides, it was agreed that the plaintiffs sPtiog
have all their affidavits filed at a reasonable
before next Seal.-
A Junior Counsel said, he • appeared f T.,";vl
assignees against whom the charge was P'''
made., and that they had put in theii.ansW6s.

toinuarteTvoonFol ItNheGl'ss,a7rEanNtcyloi.f a
7:1,
je
This was an BMtDELL V. BR.ETT. .4 /
purchased at Barnet Fair, 'nee
1826, for 321. The plaieLtill
sgrepniTinoouxnhottr,:enge:htivedil','("::tir',llias'is:flieet,; April,ti ee .vas
' defendant,
animal tertiarlced that she ;,1P
assured him that it was only a slight cold, an'',liilf
aanffitneerrie•
costingthoe id
the r
purchase,ril e
plaintiff andmare d ceatica;t:t
divJeeolc't'o,-1(101
had purchased
Bardell's
who was a horse Tor
and keep. 01'
In support of the plaintiff's case Mr. Gitlf
called several witnesses, who deposed t° eef-le'f
cidedly of opinion thati) pOSSeSSi°II Je,
sthheortlymaafrteer li:e'
A Veterimil y
very much troubled with a cough.
Surgeon also stated his bei a ailed uPoll t()Les,' ladil
the mare while living,ll' c d that "e' (i'
and drscovare 0
were affected, and on his inspecting the bay ‘
death, it fully confirmed him in his opinion. vii
Mr. CAMPBELL, who conducted the defeou'ro
case, now addressed the Jury ; and said, he looce,
doubt be should. rove to them from his evidAe4
that at the time the mare was ptirebas,e",
uit•chheasaendimialt, awnods thresyowtinedr.eat;
the plaintiff from the defendant at '
,0
Fair, she was in all respects sound, and 111°111/
client had offered to take the mare again, hutcof
plaintiff refused to part with it. The Learned ticif
tleman then called his witnesses, and frog' to4'
statement, they generally deposed, when the ifectli
the mare at Barnet, it appeared 'to them Per
►iir
sound.
Mr. GURNEY ill reply, maintained that the 'to
nesses called on behalf of the defendant, had 1100
the least shaken the testimony of those exellli"e, Dif
the part of the plaintiff, and, therefore, tITI‘'11),
client was entitled to recover, not only the surnA 0
for the mare, but also the exPences incurred ill
the animal's illness. fe
id
Lord TENTERDEN summed op the evidence
Jury, and left the case for them to determine.. re
The Jury, after a few minutes' consnitatioll,
. . . 314

urned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages -
PRINTILEGE OF NIT/INESSES-
'
During the time that the Jury were in coll
lion respecting the above cause, i s, CO:
Mr. Con said he had to 'apply caidj
n wiiti.; r
on behalf of a witnes*, who, while °ll cro,b
give evidence as a witness in a trial euter:-frolli
day's paper, had been arrested by a slot
for cleft; he was now in the officer's OS"-
they were both in Court.
fors he
Lord TENTERDEN—Let the party collie
The officer, with his prisoner, then aPreli'io
fore his Lordship, when the latter produced 11
pcena ; he was then sworn. The gentlevolliodii
stated, that he was proceeding to this Court foil
Church-yard he was arrested ' 1
by the sheriff's and in St. 01
purLpooislei
ToEf giving evidenceN
F,RDEN ordered him to be imole
discharged ont of the officer's custody.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
LIBEL.
HAYTHORN AND ANOTHER V. LAW,,,- OttJ
Mr. Sergeant TADDY addressed the Jur'
plzintiffs, and said that the plaintiffs, Messrs'io JF,

thorn and Wright, were respectable banker., v.
city of Bristol, and it was with great storijnei
saw the following letter in the Times newspot,
which the defendant is the printer, on °
July the 21st :
TO THE EDITOR OF TIIE ./
Sly:--Your sense of jtistice and of duty to 0°
would induce you to recall, or greatly modify. theoil
of
rsyour remarks upon the moral conduct of the to
peons confined in this prison, had you given's elli/if
deratien to the facts, which a day's inquiry vv/'11,„of
taiu. There are, indeed, persons of all descrirtro4
fined here, and among them some as far as anYoe/
the general one—whose cases present the strongee',4l
tion, not,
readers fromas
ybocuing,uopfptohsee,cloifartahceterwleihitichof
themselves, but of the total absence of justice 504
in those who have confined them. Of this noo7:j
a prisoner, to gratify the bigotted maliciousness ndi
mace of persecuting QuAkvio; but,.neitho ail.—
ymouo .18:1 ;011i°11.f°: