Star.
London, England, 1808-07-19 00:00:00

SURREY ADJOURNED STSSIONS.

HORSEMONGER-LANE, JULY le.
Before Serjeant ONSLOW, and a full Bench of Ma.
gistrates.
The Court has since the last Sessions been very ma-
terially altered for the better, distinct approaches
being made for the Magistrates, Counsel, and At-
torntes, the Grand Jury on the oste side, dr.: Tra.
verse Jury on the other, and the Suitors and NV itnesseso
with the Auditors to come in on the centre. A
number of houses have also been-pulled down in the
front next Newington Causeway for the carriage.
way, but which is not yet completed.
The Grand Jury were called over and sworn ; al.
ter which the Learned Chairman made an excellent
charge, the subject of which was, that he felicitated
them on the state of the Calendar, and the tranquillity
of the county, and thelittle trouble they were likely
to have. 'They then proceeded to business.
The Travers Jury were then sworn—Jar/a Neale
and William Wharfingers, pleaded (hilly to
an Indictment preferred against them, fur a nuisance
and encroachment on the Banks of the Navigab'e
River Thames. They were fined one shilling each,
and discharged, on entering into recognizance of
1001. each to abate the nuisance and remove the en-
croachment.

.....
John Acton, a publican, in Pitt-street, Kent-road,
was indicted fora gross and violent assault on Thomas
Heath. a serjeant in the East London Militia, on the
4th day of December last, at Mill-street, Dock-head.
After the Chairman had summed up to the Jury,
they found him Guilty.
In the Crime. Con. case, which stood for Trial }-ester.
day, between Lord BORRIgGDOM and Sir A. PAGLT,
judgment has been suffered to go by default. It oily
remains, therefore, for the Sheriff to assess the quantum
of damages.

Another Crim. Con. cause is pending, in which a
Gentleman of extensive property is Plaintiff, arid a
youth under 18 years, who officiated as footman in the
family, and is now a waiter at an Hotel in St. James's,
is the Defendant. The scut': of adultery is said to
have been at a village near Canterbury. The mistress
of the servant was married to her spouse in Devon-
shire, four years since, and she has two children. She
is twenty-five years of age.

Saturday, at the Clerkenwell Session, a woman
was sentenced to seven years transportation for steal-
ing the clothes of a child. The offence had been
committed previous to the passing of Mr. Alderman
Cossait's Act, else the woman would have beer. tried
for stealing the child.
There were seven Inquests held yesterday on per-
sons drowned whilst bathing on Sunday, viz. three
taken from the Sorp:.‘ntine, one from the Canal, two
from the Thames, and one from the New River.—
One of the persons drowned in the Thames was a
miniature painter, whose cries were brarli by the
company on Blacicfriars-bridge. Several boats put
off to save him, but he sunk ere assistance codld
reach him.
Saturday night Mr. GREEN, who kept the Red.
Cross Tap, in Barbican, coming down a winding
staircase, at a confectioner's in the same street,.svhere
he had been delivering beer„missed his way, fell from
a great height into a cellar, and was killed ou the
spot.
A fire broke out on Saturday night, in the upper
part of a house belonging to Mr. Bicknel, haber-
dasher, in Whitecross-street, which commai icated to
the house of Mr. Salmcn, pawnbroker. The damage
is computed at upwards of Jesoo.

• .L4W WIZ L.• ME! :
COURT OF ICING'S BENCH, JL bYAI, . • ..:^
rat tuna V. DAVISON: : •
Mr. DALLAS observed. that. he now held In Isii,
hand an amended affidavit on- behalf of a Motion'
which he made the other day,-for the purpose of
postponing until the Sittings after the nett Term,
kids trial. It was stated-that General De Lanceyleft
--London on the 27th ult. two days before the notice
of trial was given, which was cn the 29th ; that
.immediately afterwards, that was on the 2d of July,
a subpoena was sent down to Edinburgh, where the
General was, to bring him up to London ; but the
General eipiressed • some disapprobation at being
called upon in.this abript manner to take such along',
journey; fatigued as be was, and in such a feeble
state, so-much so, that .Doctor Gregory, his Phy-;
aliciati, was of opinion it would be dangerous, and,
ought be fatal, to undertake it with the expedition
lettuisite for him to anive in time for the trial of,
j
this cause, and of this there was the certificate of thi '
Learned Physician. .: -
-. Lord Eitasmomition.a-J, This certificate is not,
keceivable. Nothing is properly admissible in It Court.
ifirJtutaie but what is given under•the sanction of an
.path ; if We take these certificates of Physicians about
the health of their patients, we shall establish a pre-
cedent that they are entitled to be received in a Court
. aef Justice, which they are not ; and therefore I do not
advert to this certificate. •
The affidavits in support of this application -were
then read ; they were three in number--that of the
Defendant himself, Alexander Davison, 'Esq. ; of
Mr. Richard Wilson, his solicitor; and of JohnSfitin-
back, Esq.
Mr. DALLAS observed, that heatras most clearly of
opinion, in which all those Learned Gentlemen,
whose assistance he had at consultation, retrained,
that without the evidence of General De Lancey, it
was in vain for the defendant to think of facing 'the
case which was made against him ; although with
such testimony, he had a perfectly good defencetbitt
without it, Mr. Dallas declared he should retire feom
the case altogether.
The ATTORNET-GEWERAL did not hesitate to say
that under all its circumstances, a great deal of sus.
picion hung about this business.
, Lord Etaxwaotioton observed, that the allowing
an affidavit, on which a motion was made to post-
pone a trial, to be amended once, was a favour, and
the indulgence must have its limits, else the incon-
venience of allowing parties to shape their affidavits
to the necessities of their case would be very great.
His Lordship could not help shying there was a great
deal of suspicion attached to this application, under
all the circumstances of this case, particularly about
the departure of General De Laticey on the 27th of
June. Strictly speaking, this application ought to
have been Made in term; which did not • end until
the 6th of July. His Lordship lainented that the
. .
circumstantes, as •they appeared on the face of
the affidavits, called upon him 'to Mike, in
the discharge of his public duty, observations which
might have an unfavourable .effect on the paitv
• making the application. As the Defendant swore
positively. ahat the evidence of this witness was mate-
rial to his case, ho should be sorry to see him de-
prived of the benefit of his testimony; and yet-he
was greatly alarmed at the idea of creating a prece-
dent for postponing a trial upon such an affidavit ;
between these difficulties he should adopt the course
which was lenient to the Defendant, and order the
trial to bepostponed. -
JULY 16.--CRISf. 6111/0-.-WALKETIy ESQ. V. EEADER, ESQ,
• This was an action imputing to the Defendant a
criminal intercourse with the Plaintars Wife. The
damages were laid at 20,0001. .
Mr. ciVtow said he was never called upon to ex-
ercise his professional duties under circumstances of
ter pate and anxiety. The Defendant -was a
an belonging to the same profession as h'an-
ifelf, and with whomlle. had had a long intimacy and
friendship.: That fait, he trusted; would, not subject
Ern to any unjust criticism, or do awlk the received
opinion, that advixates, however painful the ditty cast
upon them, alwayreonducted themselves with honour
anti honesty towards their clients. :He 'had said so
much lest. it should by possibility be imagined he
would do less against the Defendankthan he should
against an indifferent person placed in the same situ-
ation. The Plaintiff was a gentleman of fortune, and
had passed much of his time in the West Indies,
where, in the year 1798, he had become enamour-
id, of his present wife, who was certainly a female
of most accomplished manners, and great beauty.—
Shortly after • his marriage he came to England,
and resided for a time in Hatton-Garden. The De.
fendant at that time had been chosen Colonel Com-
manduot of a volunteer corps, and the fact. of the
Plaintiff's having a company in the. same corps,
brouglit the parties on a footing of extreme intimacyr
Shortly after this the Plaintiff changed his resideneet,
arid took a,spacious house in Russell-square, where
the Defenda•nt appeared to have commenced a system
of intercourse so extraordinary, that-the Jury would
have to determine whether there was not something
more than friendship in the viaits ire. paid. • The
Jury would find Mr. Reader at the. rlaitatkrs house
late and early, besieging, as -it were, -the' person of
Mrs. Walker, and pursuing , her .like her shadow ;
waiting on the steps of the door,, catching as it were
every casual whisper, and .actingin, a .way, as if he
felt it impossible to live apart fro* her. Whatvextr
way she rode out, Mr. Reader *as sure to be
the road, and the coachman, as a• matter of coUrses
drew up the moment he saw him, and tool him in.
On one occasion the blinds were drawn down, and
indeed a variety of circumstances took place, which
it was impossible to reconcile in any other way than
by imputing a criminal intercOursebetween the parties
Mr. Reader would be found following Mrs. W. to
Cheltenhamevisiting her in the absence of her hus.
band, sitting with her in a room with the door fas-
tened and the window curtains drawn, and, in short,
conducting himself in a way that none of the common
purposes of life called for. On one occasion, in town,
eie servant went to the.parlour, in which Mr. Reader
and Mrs. Walker were sitting, to get the newspaper,
when she found the door'fastened. On knocking, and
telling her errand, Mrs. -W.- opened the dais stiffi-
cientry to put her arm through, and gave it. Again,
• Cheltenham, the servant observed Mr. R. coming
of the rittilig.room, and observed Mrs.W.'sdress,
b was black, masked with powder on the slued-.

der, the sofa discomposed, and pile -of the cushions
upon the ground. hfrs. W:dict riot wear powder, but
Mr..R. did. Such were the materialshe had to lay,
hafore•the-Jurywand they.would. , ide As lb the 'so
to
nests
they naturally nacited.., was trae,,the.Wit-
nesses in support Of those facte. ' discardect.-Seri
rants, all cif whonnhad lea' NrKsr . 1 in
• wq. .144-0 . iis,;
pleasntc--..they 'would thereficre watchtl*.Astitnour
with. great t.,ixtn!riapeetion, awl if they thOuld believe
they were cn . , agalnii elk mice. and happiness ,
of the Plaintiff, ana his wife. ssd seeking to ruin and
disgrace the Defendant, GOD t Orb' idiliey should cue-
ceed----nn the.other hand, it they should believe them
to be Ihewitnesses of truth, they world judge of their'
testimony as mankind in geaeral would judge, and if
they tlkught the crirainal intercoirse established the r'
woubFsay so. The next questioN would then be the,
amount of damages, and he. would not disgrace hit ni
self by saying, it the criminality was apparent, thati
it was not an aggravated • case. The Plaintiff was!
possessed of an amiable and beautiful wife, and the
way the Defendant got introduced to the family would
make his dereliction the more inexcusable. Men as-
sociated in military life had generally a nice sense of I
honour, and if the Defendant had abused the confi-I
denceof tbe Plaiatiff and seduced his wife, he ought
to pay damages adequate to the injury he had inflic-
ted. :The Learned Counsel concluded by saying,
that if the 'Jury were satisfied of the Defendant's;
guilt they would say so by their verdict; but, on the
coattaryi should the evidence not establish the 'case,
he, for one, should be glad that his friend in the hour
of trial had no 4. been found wanting in those moral
end religious dutien.which he had hitherto considered
hid; as possessing. , .
. The Arioatasn dittnian said, he would not give
the J..earned Counsel the trouble of proving the mar-1
riage, &c. but at once admit that part of the case. ,
Me. Alexander Key was then called, and spoke to
the' absence of the Plaiatiff in Scotland during they
summers of 1805 and 6. Mrs. W. was pressed to,.
accompany her husband, but the declined it. The
Plaintiff, he said, was an affectionate husband. Wit-i
ness called one day to see the Plaintiff, whim he un-
derstood to be indisposed, and was surprised on being
told that Mr. and Mrs. Walker were both from home.l
His sister accompanied him, and thinking the servant !
had been told-to deny his master, she said, ~ lam I
sure your master last borne, therefore I'll step into I
the parlour while, my brother goes up stairs." On '
saying this she opened the parlour-door, and found
Mrs. Walker and Mr. Reader together.
Mrs. C. Lancaster, who had been for five weeks in
the Plaintiff's house, spoke to the frequent visits of the
Defendant when the Plaintiff was absent- That he ,
attended Mrs. W. and herself to the play three times ; '
that Mr. Lancaster was always of the party,aed Mr.
Reader's son once. That. after the play the party
supped togethen.—That Mrs. Reader was obliged
to go to Brighton on account of the sudden severe
indisposition of her daughter ; and that the engage.
ments foithe play were made before Mrs, Reader was
apprised of such indisposition ; and that Mrs. Reader
was to have been one of the party. That Mr, Reader
and son on another evening supped at Mrs:Walker's,
and Mr. Reader read to there a novel called " Herm-
sprong, or Man as he is not."
The whole effect of this lady's testimony went to
shew much attention on the part of Mr. R. and hit fa-
mily, to Mrs. W. and that they were often together,
andahat the witness never observed any impropriety in
Mrs. W.'s conduct, or any thing to. create suspkion.
Wm. Sanford, a discarded footman, spoke to the
frequent visits of the defendant, and to his having
found the parlour door fastened, when the defendant
and his, mistress were together s but he admitted, upon
a question from Lord 7ELLENBOROI.7OII, that he had
. ever mentioned this circumstance either tolls master
or to any of his fellow-servants.
Esther Tayinr, a discarded maid-servant, gave evi-,
dence that her mistress was a woman of violent tem-
per ; waeconstantly quarreling with her servants ' • and
that no one could live with her. That she was always
;at home, by her express command, whenever Mr./
Reader called, upon whose visits her temper became
immediately compoied and cheerful. She had found
the drawing-room door fastened when the defendant
and her mistress were together. She had known him
walk from eight till twelve at night, backwards and
forwards before the door, looking up at her mistress's
dressing-zoom window on the two pair, but admitted,
to a question from Lord ELLENL'OROUGH, that the
defendant could not have seen Mrs. W. unless she
had put her head out of the window. She also more
that the defendant was in the constant habit, for .
fifteen months together, of spending two or three hours'
in the morning with ;Ars. W. between the hours ofi
eleven and four, althc ugh the whole Court knew that'
the greater part of that time was- spent by the defen-
dant in the daily:discharge of his professional duties
in the Court of King's Bench. One day at Chelten-,
ham, as witness was passing the sitting-room, she saw
Mr. Reader come out, and Mrs. W. observing her,
called her in, when the sopha was discomposed, and
one of the cushions on the ground.. Mts. W. desired,
her to ~ tidey" the sopha, and to get a brush and rub
the powder off the shoulder of her gown, which witness
Sid. That witness should not have observed either
the powder on her gown, or the condition of the sopha,
'had not her mistress called her attention thereto ! ! !
Upon her cross-examination, thecircumstance of the
bolted door evidently amounted to nothing, as the
door of the room in which Mr. R. and Mrs. W. were
sitting, had no lock upon it, and the door could not
be kept shut without bolting it on the inside.
Francis Whitsay, a discarded coachman,swore that
he was so much in the habit of meeting the Deceit•
dant while driving his ;mistress, whether she went to
the east or to the west, that he, as a matter of course,
drew up to let the . Defendant in, whenever he saw
him, n ithout even the check-string being pulled ---.
But upon being strictly questioned by the Judge as to
the period when this took place, he fixed it to be
about the middle of March 1.807, when it was uni.'
versally known, and admitted .on all hands, that the
Defendant was on the Midland Circuit.
All the servants spoke, with great acrimony, of
their mistress's ill treatment of them, and uniformly
agreed in their dislike of her.
I- Aiperson of the name of Teasdale spoke of the
Defendant's following and watching Mrs. W. upon
cone occasion, but upon cross-examination, proved
that the door of the room where Mrs. W. and Mr. R.
were sworn by the servant to have been, was so ex-
nittenly difficult to open that he had complained to
-tbs. Plaintiff himself of that ;irciunstaace, and that he

.

Mi.

Ltisi
the
diatWM. .
tic irneyiG efierai shutting
.of the parlour do& appears to me, even ifyon
the witnqss who swore it, to have been coinPletely
'cued 1--* tmi '.:tion of the lock ; and to

to
_
_ by diet,. perfet
fe r
va
improbablena
nyt flungt
iptehaia: it
pries. na l had
o
and that there was no necessity for going into the de-
fence, The e pwhJidacuaer:ey:taclliatitihdNeveeicisl:arniviteholdlest' themselves perfectlysatistsed
-fence and immediately pronounced a verdict. for the
defendant.
The Court was extremely crowded, and the event
of this extraordinary cause was received with .univer-
sal satisfaction.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JULY ta.
BREACH OF PROMISE OF MARRIAGE.
FORREST V. 1.10 N%
The plaintiff in this case sought ttf recover dama-
ges from the defendant for breach of promise of Mar-
ria, under very aggravated circumstances.
The facts, as detailed by the Plaintiff's brother, a
master baker in King-street, St. James's, are these :
The Defendant is also a baker, at present residing in
Chancery-lane ; the Plaintiff and he, who are about
the same age, had been acquainted for many years,
'their parents being next door neighbours, in the town
of Peterhead, in Scotland. The witness, who had
been settled in London for a good many years, hav-
ing, in the year 1800, gone to Scotland to see his
friends, was applied to by. the father of dui Defen-
dant to take him under his care, which 'he die., and
instructed him in his business of a baker. After some
time, it.was proposed, that so soon as the Defendant
should be settled in business he should marry the
Plaintiffi Her father was applied to for his consent,
which he at first declined giving, but at length grant-
ed, on understanding that a mutual attachment sub-
sisted between the parties. He at the same time
agreed to give as a marriage portion with his daugh-
ter 2501. and to settle an additional sum of COOL .on
her at bis death. In the mean tune the Defendant
entered into treaty for the business of a baker, who
wished to retire, and to 'enable hifn to do so, the wit-
ness advanced him about 4001. Havint concluded
the bar the Defendant poetised going clown to
Scotian & foe the purpOse of bringing up the Plain-
tiff, but ;it was thought More advisable that she
should come to town under tb cmv of .a
confideiatial
friend of his. The Plaintiff had arrived in icrs4n and
the Defendant was settled in his house about Christ-
mas 1805, and the marriage was :Axed for _an early
day in January.' So eager was the Defendant to
have it concluded that he went, iccoispaniect brill*
witness, to .constilt the parish Out. ivhother the
banns might not, as .in Scotland; be reclaimed
times on the same day. Finding that this.could not
be done, he resolved to apply to Doetors Commons,
for a licence, so that no delay might take place. On
Sunday, the sth of Januar.y,:the marriage being
fixed for the following Thurtdayo the Defendant in-
vited the Plaintiff'to siini at his house, for the purpose
of introducing her, as his affianced bride, to some of
his friends. He here detained her to so late. an hour,
that her brother, not being of the party„ she was in-
duced to remain all night. When the witness, next
- morning, remonstratedon the impropriety of such a
proceeding, the Defendant made light of the matter,
and insisted, as the. marriage was to take place on
Thursday, thamthere could be no harsh in her remain-
ing in his house till then. He feigned an excuse, howe.
ver, for postponing the marriage from that day, and
repeatedly afterwards, from day to day, although the
Pliuntiff's father, alarmed at the situation in which his
daughter had been placed, came up from Scotland,
and remonstrated with him on the dishonourable part
he was acting. He still professed his determination
' to keep his promise, alledging, however, as reasons
for the delay, first, the.expectation of the arrival of
his father, whomhe wished to be present, and-U=lly
his inability to procure the consent of his father Lathe
Match. He eves went the length of alledging that
faith had not been kept with him, the Plaintiff's fa-
ther not baying given him the 2501. on his commen-
cing business. The_ father, to obviate this obiection,
;offered him an order for the money, which was meant
as a marriage portion, and as such to be paid only
when the marriage should take place, payable tea
.days after the. solemnization of the marriage—and
the brother endeavoprecl to point out the absurdity of
the pretext, by. reminding him of the 4.001. he had
advanced, '2501. of, which he was willing the Defea..
. dant should retain ashia sister's portion. It was at
.length discovered that the Defendant had no inten-
,-tiOn of fulfilling his eagagentent—the Plaintiff was
[taken home to the house of her brother, and the
onsequence of her improper confidence in tlap honour
:of the Defendant was, that in.sheOctobfriplihe saxue
year she was delivered of a child. . • - .
After_ this statement, which was given with the
almost clearness and precision,
Mr. flerjeaat SHEPHERD, and Mr. Serjeant 13esr,
:Counsel for the Defendant, proposed to Mr. Serjeant
LENS and Mr. Serjeant ONsitossybr tho' Plaintiff, to
settle matters without farther trouble to the Court.
Mr. Serjeant Lags, after some coesultation, in-
formed his Lordship, that theyhad agreed on-thepart
of the Plaintiff to accept of .501. damages, and 151. a
year for the child, during its life, the custody of it re-
snaining with the mother. •
Sir JAMES MANSFIEp Expressed. his surprise at any'
.such agreement having been made. lie; however,
ad tothing. to do with it. His Lordshi? afterwards
remarked, that the present appeared to him to be a
case that called for damages. The Defendant Vi
extremely fortunate in having got the other party to
enter into such an agreement, and had the Jury Liven
10001. damages, he should not have been of opinion
they were excessive. He wished, however, to know
what security was to be given for the 151. per annum.
Mr. Serjeant OzisLaw said, it was proposed tomake
it a rule of Court.—The business was accordingly set-
, ' tied in that manner.

. . •

t'
x 1 T~~~~i~ ~iPllil~L d

6t/ItN EIKCIOIINOE, hotAltit-laiNE,
liar fresh ariiivila &Wheat Ws airr •
Alld db. flue doll
ler geoirtors-LVery halo Cale)" holsltvlir
4rhis li are dearer- grey and Beans the. two
`there are tolerable stisildieg of•Oilts)
cepoinlCT As uNDr'
JAW, 54.7d1PAM. 3:13M11 (i4O(
Fine ditto, 625. Sic. Tick di (o
Rye, 4&. qua tits, 401. 42
..•.-
Barley, 44e• 40s. Arecf•llosol..
Malt, 66.4. 76e. • ,"]. • .
Aqiite Peas (golferi), RSpe Sciv4
-Grip ditto, .; . • .
ir,)0•1 I,lollr
RE L'kbf vkiek. of divstlNoitt board'
;Whews.-1 • • dit. fxSie:!* -14cilerft!•-•
Pins - `lis.4Bll
*Supertrk .11.3 s to 841 Orei
'Mine White • ••• t0619* dais' niopedr
11). • 41 8. D*ll94‘. .
Barley Vas tF tSs
Vine - hi to 4lk
Mali „rstwilf...944‘.. e.
White Pease Fpit,e9 120. POlands
Rape fled SSE to 981. per fliE doltre4lonr
FROM THE LONDON ClAfkiri'tk,
Average Price of Corn in Englasi., An 4
ending the 9th of July, istsl:: •
*heat. Rye. Bactii-
s. d,I a. d. s. d• .lbs
Si 4 55 10 " 4S 10' I "112 10
. The average Price o Sugar, tenni-S=4f(
in the week ending the 18th by of
'RETURN or WHEAT in Mail-bile, in(
!• 4th of idly to the Stk. of Julys: -Tistai
Auntie 80$.. 100..4. 644.10*!...t th.
A Rrruitki OF FLOeftt
• - *on the 2sl of7tdgtp.thell&at lull
'Total 16,131/ racks-'-Aerate 671. Silk
• " • es. 3d." higher than labs return:
PRICE OF HOPS. •
• 7' ' "oar.
r. t .
Kent 81. ss. to 41. 10ett DSc to ti
Susie: Si. 10s. to 41. Cs. Susse4 21 lett. it VV. VII
Rases 81. Os. to 41. kw. Farrier , )IA. Gbh. to **
PltitE OF Hors of THE EOM:MCI:IL MikitkEt. •
BigiOCent 5t.144. to 44. lOs Pockets elk tbo. to 4. to.
Some al ios. to 41. 46. ibisP4l43ol4s‘ Gs. ib
tquct OF itAlr AND' STRAW TN Sint fika:
Meabor Hay it 'O. DI 61. i 54: th-51% kte
New ditto 51. .ta. to ft 156. gist* It es. ib A. 10,
SMITHFIELD MAlitkii',l.lli.t. is.
• •TO s:nk the Oital pee. stone of 4111 - •
Oti. to ss. 2d. Veil 41. tscl. th bit 4
&Luton -. 45. 4d. to ss. 04. Pork 45.. 'tad. to Mk it
• Lamb ' Ss ed- to is
NP. lOATE AAP LEADENHALL MAIOCET.
_ _

Per Pone of qb.bi tire cantaith • .
Beef Ss. 4d. to 4s„ 4d Veal Ilit. 5.14. to ks. id
Muttoh 4s, Od. to Is.- Ott' Po!k ' 4S. 04. to 41k *
Lamb 4* Od, to 6s 4d: . .
SEA-COAL METERS' OFFICE, 1.021I1X)IA itYLV Mk'
eaßt6ts, tint, and slit
t !Amide's I Victim*. hillph
—1.14 Y I 1-1 -JIA9 it., :A* l*.
, i4II 7
1: 1 _s
2 *52 0 17
I_o
t 511; 'I litl
1 i *ll 6 4.1 01
1145 b 1. _

si
411

K 41
'at*
csi

a.O

44 O.
410;

61.

p!

:4441,
** e

P~i~r

gua,

Co!
No.

7

sw

• 1r
r.oti
JCIL

Info
Goa

gt.
wei

:11

out°

jhad mots once. seconirirailed plertksmlth to him i
tilan .., ,•,„, _
._ _ ~,.. ..at
to repair' it, and nat.so prolrea uuat all the respectable]
Inhale friends,l4)firs. W. co lied to vait,*. 141;
to the'hout En *KO hit,.*as ipiruig.lii, teimpao4.
----ItltereirPols zoiXt.ti:AincttistAif int.42931,*10
goal
asked the g4i4Off'S Counsel if thise kiits a lin
.„*..-
cun4tiattoreien iravflitoipneNt [acted; .44; drPl-
- )#rY,.5"..`! TOl.t have be-l.ta the tase,,, -
tl ' "' and Mr. AttkneY-General, *ill, 444*Si, y.c4t
in taihatf of the ref ant yoillaiie doubtatiL te-
. . ~
.mairthlg on, your ril t , _it, you have the astpause
'or surmise, you ha,ve aiity to declare it, and the
AtiorneyiGeneral &A proceed s but the shutting
. ____ .......: :r........ 1.A.1;‘.......

•
s.
t .
E, lUI.Y
•
an abnadant eto
014603i4 aad 4
41. k • -'
L'l4ol Pi% 1.4
tick" tililestdaitA
!: - •
exit. fie* •
(old) mix aft
423. 445.
Mr 411. 463
ti% 47.. -
sta. t: eiti .
"ass. 6r•3. for
4 Sit3p ai unCtei. Ban
itifft
te-• ,S6synAt
it las
Ws WO clial
(0,02; nate
t• • 00s kr*. O.(
• 10i 4Bt fao
v Os to gatirr-41447
th, Mil' • • itc,
ohs. !a?ms.thetetatia
Baia 141 e Liei
1 tts. 11.
:.1
From the *dull* jai
s 30s. 6•l4.pszciris.
scrudirt oattfilisEitt til I
I.lll3llgettiit. • Rai;
than tass 441
tit