The Sun.
London, England, 1827-04-10 00:00:00

clause, and, as he trusted, satisfied the Rona that it Wall
not only fair, but necessary.
Mr. HUME took the clause to be a deviation from the
Principles on which the Bill had set out.
Mr. C i-.-'I.ANT explained.
Mr. L.I7.IJELL (we believe) spoke from under the gal-
itrY) but in so low a tone as to be inaudible.

Sir JOHN NEWPORT ha►ing already taken the sense
Of the House with respect to the importation of flour, did
not intend again to press a division ; but thought it would
be much more satisfactory to the country, and more likely
t° Carry into effect the designs of the Government, if they
Would give the business a trial for three years, or any other
period that might be deemed advisable. He thought that
if some limit should he placed to the operation of the Bill,
it would be much better relished by the country.
C. GRANT was extremely sorry to be obliged to
oppose the suggestion of the Right Hon. Baronet. He
knew the advantages of experiment; but he feared that if
the Bill should be limited to any precise period in the man-
ner suggested by the Right Hon. Baronet, it might un-
settle the notions of persons with respect to a measure which
Was intended to be permanent.
Mr. WARBURTON should move that the clause be
omitted.

Mr. C. P. THOMSON seconded the motion.
Mr. CANNING made a few remarks, in a tone of voice
which rendered them not distinctly audible in the gallery.
It had been rightly stated by the Honourable Member for
Aberdeen, that the object of Government was to abolish
prohibitions. But there were two distinct things con-
founded in the term " prohibition." It was true, as
stated, as to prohibition of grain, quoad this country ; but
the prohibition in the clause was quoad the country from
Whence the grain was imported. The mode of dealing with
those countries which had reciprocity treaties was different
from that with countries which had not reciprocity treaties.
The principle was exactly the same in both cases.
We left the offending country in the same condition in
which we found it. We repealed discriminating duties ge-
nerally, and we reserved the right of re-imposing them in
respect to those countries in which these duties should not
be repealed. Now, what was the consequence to the fo-
reign country? A partial prohibition as to sending corn ;
which left that country in a similar situation as before, and
precisely as if the bill had never passed. The whole objec-
tion arose from a misconception as to the term " prohibi-
tion," which meant two different things, though the prin-
ciple was alike in both eases. He agreed, however, with
his Right lion. Friend, the Chancellor of the Exchequer,
in hoping that the case contemplated in the clause might
not, and in believing that it would not, occur.
Colonel SIBTHORP said a few words in favour of the
clause,

The amendment was negatived without a division, and
the bill and amendments were then read a second time.
On the question that the bill be engrossed,
Mr. MONCK, after stating the hardships of the farmer
In being compelled to pay a money-rent instead of a corn-
-4'l; proposed a clause authorizing the holders of leases
VOW subsequent to May 1815, and before the passing of
the bill, to pay only one-third of the rent in money, and
the remaining two-thirds in corn, or a sum of money equi-
valent to a quantity of corn calculated at the rate of Is. the
imperial bushel.
Mr. WARBURTON seconded the motion.
The clause was brought up and read a first time. On
the question that it be read a second time,
Air. C. GRANT opposed the clause, on the ground that
't introduced an entirely new principle, which the House
was not then prepared to discuss.
The clause was negatived without a division. The Bill
Was ordered to be engrossed.
WRIT OF RIGHT BILL.

Mr. SHADWELL moved the further consideration of
the report on the Writ of Right Bid.
Mr. FERGUSON made a few remarks, the purport of
which we did not hear.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL as far-as we understood
oPposod the Bill.
Mr. BERNAL wi:.hed to know from His Right Hon.
arid Learned Friend, Attorney-General whether he in-
tended to oppose this Bill, for with all the attention which
Le had paid to his Right Hon. and Learned Friend's spch
j'e had not been able to learn what his intentions were.ee
He could not see what rational objections could be made
t 0 this Bill. It had been said that the term of 40 years
t'vas too short ; but in reply to that observation he would
Iterely say, that in a writ of right of former days, the
le, NI was limited to 20 years. With all the kindness which
4e felt for his Right Hon. and Learned Friend, he was
°l)liged to say that he looked upon the opposition which he
gave to the Bill as another proof of the disadvantages with
which eminent professional men surrounded themselves by
too close an attachment to the mere forms of their profes-
sion.
Mr. SHADWELL, in reply, defended his Bill on the
ground that it would remove much of the expence and the
trouble which at present attended all conveyances of real
Property. The Bill was modelled on a Bill which was
introduced into the House by Lord Kenyon in 1753, and
which obtained so much of its favour as to go through a
Committee.
The amendments were then read a second time, and or-
dered to be engrossed.
Mr. HUME hoped that this Bill would be extended to
church property. He concluded by moving an amendment
ta the same effect as his speech.
Mr. ESTCOURT hoped that the Learned Gentleman
tvho *,trodueed this Bill would not allow such an
rneuth, to be tacked to it without due notice being given
° the parties whose interests would be affected by it.
th, SHADWELL could by no means give his assent to
e amendment proposed.
Till amendment was then negatived. The bill with the
7,lenclrnente was ordered to be engrossed, and to be read a
n,rd time to-morrow.
in
Mr.ESTCOURT brought in a bill to regulate the grant-
s ()I licences to public-douses in England. It was read a
first time, and ordered to be read a second time to-morrow.
The other orders were then disposed of, and the Huuse
jiJourn.d at a quarter before 12 o'clock.

lia I_ PRICFS OF IRISH STOCKS, APRIL, 7.--
i:,zi,i. Stock
cy. 4,011, 3 per cent sja4 Royal Irish Ditto .......
rs9''• Stock, 3,1,' per cent. 87S 8 National Ditto ............ •••IN i-nkto, New
Patriotic Ditto .. . ........ 4
Gl,eovr. Cent
1....
........... t4.714-----iim Hibernian Bank . . .......................... 16:1;
Royal DQb• 3N per cent
;Zr, d Canal Stock -- lin perial Mine ................ _
N. 4-1 Ly_ vb. 4 per c t SO Mining Co. of Ireland ... 2:z,
''ulast Office on
Deb.----------....._1__ 4p. ct. Commercial Buildings ...... 's—'l

... 11H /G
MOrni„ WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW.
"••• minutes after I Evening ...58 minutes after I.
es 1 .

fdt •.% t
;X,'46,11n VAL Utt
•