The Sun.
London, England, 1820-07-21 00:00:00

i:PIAIREit. DtTTll.'l4.

NIINtrgES of EVIDENCE relative to the TIMBER TRADE,
taheo before the SELECT COMMITTEE of the HOUSE
of LORDS, apliointed to inquire into the Means of extend-
ing and securing.the FOREIGN TRADE of the COUN-
TRY, and to Report to the House.
(Continued from our Paper ofeyesterday4

JOHN HENRY PELLY, Esq. is then called in,
and examined as folfoi'vs

Whist Business have you been principally engaged 'in ?
I was originally in 'the sea Line; I coininandeda ship in the
Est I. di.s tomp4ny's Service ;
.since that time I have been
engaged in an Iron Concern, and subsequently in a Mer-
cantile House in the Norway Line; a House of Agency

chien. -
. ,
HOW inns hare yonbeen concerned in the.;Cprwiifrrade ?-
,Abynt four yrn7s and a half.

Have yon observed any fluetnntion during that period in dm
Trade bet ween, Norway and this Cowitry ?-17e,y e'or6ider-
able ; it has been dimini.hing, and. at present there is little
,or nothing doing; it is afinn:t in a state of stagnation.

. . _
To .what do yin attrilinte that diminution hiring taken
place ?--.The pressure' of 'the D.ity upon that particular line,
the Duties bring the voile upon Deals of eight feet in length
and eight inches wide, as upon. twenty feet and eleven inches
title and Norway not bring enabled- to produ6e very long
lengths or wide Dealt, the Duty lies particularly heat); -upon
them.

Have the Norwegians any other mode of payinz for BO-
fish mkinnfactures, than by the Export of their 'limber ?

Your.

You are of opinion, then, that no consumption of British
Manufactures can tahe'place in Norway, while the Duties arc
such as to im;ede the Importation of Timber front that Coon-
,r) ?—Certainly nut ; I can State more particularly the effect
of the Duty on the Norway Trade; the Nor (vay Deals gene-
rally run short, not exceedine- on an average thirteen feet ill
length, their width from'nioe to ten inches; ninny of ;be
other Northern Countries can inipint them twenty feet in
length and eleven iaches• wide, 'alder the saute Duty ; of
eoUrse the Duty is nearly double upon the same quantity of
Wood from Norway, that which it is frOin thiisetnunt ries
that produce the long Deists; but it is more particulen ly with
respect to the tritOe from Canada being admiped Duty free, that
the pressure is felftipon theNorwegianitoOds, inasmuch as I
conceive. Deals of an ecytal quality, or I would say of a better
quality, could he fairly imported into this Country at the
standarl twelve feet three inches for 161. per hundred; the
Deals front Canada nearest in quality are now salting per-
haps at six and twenty; the difference of freight between the
two Countries cannot be considered as above bl. per hun-
dred; therefore the Duty of 211. 10s. ad. is not only a pro-
tecting Duty to the British Ship-oWner, which 81. would af-
ford, but it will have the affect of a prohibition from Norway:-
This same quality of Canada Deals was selling last year at
perhaps thirty-two or thirty, four, and is only reduced now in
consequence of, immense Importation beyond consumption ;
hot if the Northern Ports were altogether prevented front im-
porting by a prohibitory Duty, there is no reason why the
Canadian Merchant should out false his price beyond the pre
.sent-pt'ice:of,twenty-,ix upon the consumer; the Duty of 2tl
per hundred giving hint tact a riroooply,.
During the time you have been coot-el-Sant with the Trade,
has the Norwegian Timber been principa'llY imported in ves-
sels or Norwegian built ?—Gcnerally speaking in-Nor-
wegian :ships, but, in peace I think this` would 'not he the
'case; the Norwegian ships are wearing out fast ; and I feel
-sure, that the British shipping. open the presumption that.
they,get a fitight which pays't hem from Canada, can sail as
cbeapof, not cheaper, than the Norwegian ships, and the.
Norwegians are almost invariably s.dling their ships-. I had
a Commission last year to srll twelve or fourteen Norwegian
ships ; if I could hate ttrixted .a
sale for thein, they woold
very readily have taken at the tate of 51. a ton, which was
very little more than bleat:jog up price, but it was not to be
obtained.

Do you attribute that circumstance particularlyto the distress,"
of the country, or to. an opinion that Norway freight is dearer
than British ?—1 have stated that the freight is nearly upon.
a par at present, there is no great difference in the freight ;
the Norway freight is very much regulated at present be what'
the British ships will go for, and they do not find it answer_;;
so much so, that the principal part of the.ship owners are dis-
posing of their.ships.
Haveithe ships that have imported Tit-o)er from Norway
generally returned in ballast, or carried back a•cargo?—A'
great many of them in ballast ; the article imported being
bulky and of small value ; so that although they take out
a certain quantity of goods, yet they are goods occupying a_
small tonnage ; in fact, the returns in many instances are.so.
small for their cargoes, that it is a mere trifle sometimes that
tin:y have to their credit on the consignment ; es far as their
freight is concerned, they invariably 'spend half of it in this
Cituntry. The terms upon which the ships are freighted,'are
to pay half down money', and the other half in a bill at
four months, and the Captain invariably takes up that half
freight, and it is expended in this Country for different ex-
verces before he goes ; .and in many instances, the whole of
the half !reight hardly ever satisfies (hem ; but-the exports are
nut immediately from ibis :Port, or altogether threugh our
House of Agency ; but ships that rouse to Liverpool-frequent-
ly take a cargo of Salt, and mime of the Northern shipsload
back with Coals; a variety of goods. ace taken by the Norway
ships that do not go through our
_House,, bht are stippli,rl by
other Merchants,' who eto to Norwayiand deal with the Nor-
wegians, with Out our •interveution as a House of Ageney,--so
t toot he Bills,,only pass
_through its. In, two instances last
year I cargoes, the grtiss proceeds of one amounted to
3,6361. and the other to 3,620 L, and the net proceeds Neese
only-921. Ntt). the.former, and 671. upon the latter ; . the rest
of the money remained here in Charges, Duty; and Co:Omis-
sion, &c. the cargoes had been certainly lying time on
cons'gnusent, but: ihat.was the result of those two cateoes,
t heft:him from such returns there would not he any Keil large
exportation.. ,
%%lien you state thot-tbe returns are small, do you mean
• small in bulk, or small in Value ?,--The returns small in va-
lue; t wo I ii4V.O instanced, one. at 921. ou is said amounting to
.3,6361-aud 171. on a sale of 3,6201.; but generally they are
small in value so much is swallowed up in freight and
charges,ami other t xpences, that the return to the shipper is
hut to the consumer the article ht.-comes very dear,
iuuasieuch as. I have 'stated before, the article cat) he supplied
at-161. 10s. per hundred,-and 3sl. per hundred is the price
that the Deal Merchant pays io the first instance.
Cafe you state t icconcp.erutire quality of Norwegian Tim-
ber, with that of the other Northern States ?—The Timber
from. Norway certainly' is of the best quality, for the pur-
poses for which it is used (Deals,) of ally that comes fromthe
Northern States this is generally adnilled.
Not.excluding Memel ?—No, Memel is a large Timber, and
runniog large it is more generally used, and better adapted
for the purposes of Timber ; but as far as Deals at-'concern-
ed, the Norway Timber is superior to Memel, or any other.
YOu have spoilt n 'of the price of 161. les. per hundred ;
where does that price take place ?--I reckon that the prime
'cost on board the ship is about 101. the hundred, 41. for
height, and 21. 10s. hir commission, and charges in this
Country, bringing it to lin. 10s. exclusive of all Duties the
Duty being now 211. lOs. brings it up to 381., which is the
price at which we can now 5141'4.
Is the taste for !Walsh Manufactures very prevalent in Nor-
, way ?—Very prevalent ; the better class of people are all
clad in English Articles, English Cloth ; and from my corre-
spondent there, I know that the tower classes, when dressed
on Sunday, pride themselves on wearing a British Coat, it
they are snatched so to do. ,
Is there any limits to that taste, butt the liniitation of the
means of indulging should tbink not r when they gut
a better price for their article the taste fur British articles In-
crcased' tyry touch.
Do you apply this to furniture as well as to clot Icing ?—Cer-
tainly., •
What would be the 'effect of laving the same runty on Ca.-
nada Tiatbey as on the Timber of the North of Europe ?—lf

Duty wins made equal, ft conscluenc'e natuplly

prevent the Canada Timber being tirought home, inasmuch
as Canada lying somuchfartin4 off than the Northern Ports
the difference of freight Would be an Lxclfisififi;tint if there
was a Duty equivalent to that difference, I think there
then be a diminOtion of the Trade, but nut altogether an ex-
closififi. •

..... . ,
Is t be quality different ?—Certainly, in tome instances Very
different ; that .enintit be more strongly COI:IT:eft than that Ihe
Cauadian Merchant is selling his -red pine • derili at.this my
ment at about twenty;Onepotinds per hundr;:d, and the white
Sprott, which approach nearer to the rpurtity of the inferior
Norway, -me triow selling at:twenty-six, as I,stated before;
and although the price of inquirtation, I Conceive, may be
nearly the same for red pine. thud white Spruce deals, he is
tahing the advantage of that 51., in .coasequence of the su-
perior quality of the latter over the fu►mer article, as the
Northern 'competition is shut out by •the high duty.
Ought not the ditty tope laid with reference to the quality
of the article, as well as with reference tit the difference. of
f. eight, its iir..der to give them au equal chance In the market ?
That would only allow them to-bring home to the consumer
here an article uf• an inferior quality, at the same rate as one
of a superior quality.- -
What is the freight, of 100 deals from Canada ?—I consider
the freight at present. as•aboltt 121.; the freightttf' a load of
timber _is about el. 10s., andiktirre are abort five loads -of
Timher- in 100 twelve feet deals': that would bring it `to

dbout 121.
Are the prohil,itions and restrictions on the importation of
British pro lace and mawifacture into Norway, the same as
exist in SiNedi-9.l?—Norw;ry has alvays been eons.idvied as a
distinct King.doin. I believe at presont,tbe Law is the•same,
and Itu:re if,s been recently .sonte iirohibition in Sweden,

_ .
Ii; I have Inever linderstooil. they have bee.n.acted upon in
Norway. .
You Cannlot speak partieularly to your own knowledge ?---
No, I cannot, as we are only Aiients for the Sale; we du not
semi out Lroof:s on Wielqt'll aeepttat. ' .

Do you know any thirig of ihr State of Norway, aa It • re•
cprcts distres, ?—That they are in great 'distress, and the
Capital the A:tenta have loCkeil up there, and that they cannot
get, is aery Considerable. 1 tbirif,-. I speak within etnupa4g,
when" i s,iy, that the debt due from ibe Norwegians tn .the
136, b nits here is nearly half a in'Allott of money. .
What other articles of Export has Norway, besides Timber ?
None, hardly; to this Couotry.
No fish?-N,., they exhort sonic fish to the Mediterranean.
No lobsters ?—Tl,,,c lob‘ters canght tyon the Coast of
Norway. lint that is vet y it. is a nitre fishing
hnbi-
nest in a couple of hands.' . .
. Which .17; the principal Part of 'Norway for the Expot ?
Christian it ; induesd it is the only Port now winch can send :ttly
1,2 11114 Country.

Linde! the existing regulations of this Country, what in an
lvive the N rwegiaos of lignidating that debt of •Italf
tnillion ?—None whatever ; I upon it We shall lose thi,;
whole of the tuoney, unless snare relief is afforded; have
rery'coositterahle mmtgages
,upon their landed estates, and
upon their woods, and unless we arecoallied bring theni
hione, in some shape or another, the money must he lost.
Du you think I'l3l, have the .meaus 9 f carrying on any in-
creased trad,t with us at present ?--Not under the present re,..
gulations certainly.
17-nder any regulation's, do von think that the present po-
verty td Norway yould.perilllit them to catty on any increased
Trade with this Country?-1f there was a fair opentog, so
that the ditty,wai not laid as a 'proliihit,•ry duty altogether,
and that the Norwegians 'could get a very tritile beyond their
actual expellees of euttiag their Timber, whatever that ex-
cess.was, they would be able out of that, to liquidate their

debt.
Do you think that, under those circumstances, it would he
a remit:l4l)lr then;; for Merchants to 'ltch-Into re dee per in that
'Trade. iu Which there is at preseot so large a slim out as half
a million, and with so bail proipeCts of recovering it ?.—Cer-
thinly not; but we are obliged, when people are anxious to
pay their debt, and nuder the impressioti that their deals -
must sell, to receive them. We have several cargoes. bonded
already, that will not probab'ev pay freight and duty ; ofcourse
there is little chance of there being any thipg for the payment
of the debt. The money advanced by different houses
.upon
the goods, has Vern in fact to keep them from a state of bank-
ruptcy, in hopes of some alteration.
You say there is a bad prospect of payment of this half Mil-
lion due to. the British Merchants, t xcept front encourage-
ment; 10 what sort of encooragement did you look when
you said that?—eau equalization,of duty after allowing"the
British Colonies in America a protecting duty to cover differ-
.efice of freight, and a regulat 'Ma of the limy as far as the
otherPoWers on the Continent are concerned, by malting it
a graduating duly.
Then the protecting duty for the iltnerican Timber is
equally disadvantageous to all I he polls yf the North
Rut the way.of laying the d:ity i 3 pai'ticoiarly is to the
Ports of Norr4ay ?—Yes ; if the daty was :aid on a gr;iduated
scale as it is in Ireland, eight feet, tats feet, twelie feet, and
so on, it would lenitive that objection ; fa the Norwegian
cannot now ship any eleven, ten,-or nine feet deals, and these
are consequently excluded 'front the market, auto he_ IS obliged
to sacrifice those lengths 'to get the a,tvantage the duty dn,
eight feet deals gives hint ; far if a twelVe toot deal costs W..
eleven would cost 91. 39. 4d.; a ten foot would be SI. es. Sd.;
and an eight foot 61. t;s, Bd, ; the ,duty being the same uoon
the twelve, eleven and ten, the•charges upon the twelve loot
would be 281.; the charges upon the eleven. foot, would be,
271.95. 2d. ; the charges upon the ten foot would be WI. 14s. ;.
and the charges upon the eight'foot 'worth) 10, I IL 13s. l id ;
the sale price of the twelve feet would be. 331, ; the sale price
Of the eleven feet would be Ios. Bd. ;/ the sale price of the.
ten feeewould be 301. Ss. ; and upon the eight feet 191. ; the;
consequence would be, that the, twelve feet wortld 'produce,'
101. which cost 101.; ,the eleven feet ixould produce 71. is
which co,t 91. 3s. 4d.; the.sale plat- of the-te-n fret would he;
31. 14s..ssikich cost 81, fis.iid.; and the sale price of the eight:
feet would be SI. 6s. Id. which cost only -el. Gs. Bd.; so t ha(
:the .sale price upon the eight feet amounts to exactly the,
prime cost of the ten feet, so that the shippee had better ctit.
off three feet of his deals and Ipirti it artnime, and he gets
more for the eight feet by the present mode of charging the;
duty, than lie would by sending deals of eleven feet in length.
Have the Exporters.of Timber been iuditeed to avail them-.
selves moan) of that facility by cutting then letigths shorter ?.
-LTheyhave sent a cittOderahly large rrulanst;ty of eight feet •
• in consequence, but that I do not consider as availing Ahem-
selves of it ; in fact they are excluded from the elevens andtens altogether, by the mode of laying flu; dory.
What is the-eauSe of the lengths of Norway Timber being
shot ter than anyother ; is it not on account of the state of
the country, and of the roads, ante the difficulty of transport ,
Timber of heavy sizes?--Nn, the Timber is nut naturally
so lame.
Is there ally fair reason why the other Northern Powers-
should have v comparative adrantage over Norway in 'then
scale 'of the doties?—l should think rant, particularly in
lengths; for although the greater, distanee from England
causes an additional freight, yet as they are enabled to cito
their deals eleven :inches wide, when the Norwegian cannot
get them above nine, they have the net vania4e,Df one-fifth
nearly in- the duty, and supposing the duty to he at the rate
of 201. for twelve feet, it gives them an advantage of mote
' than 41. which is equivalent to the udditional;freight for the
additional distance,

Do not you conceive the Port of London a had Pm t for Nor-
wegians to come •10, from the difficulty °lgo t ing a return ; is
it no a less advantageous Port for the Norwegians to coie to,
t"n'l „
Liverpool, and do not they More often go back in ballast
from this Port than from Liverpool ?.—As Wood is so 6)4119,
an At tiele, it is impossible to load-backltie toonage in full of
the manufactures and of the articles that they would tahe
from this country, therefore it is-possihlelhat •I he ships which
go to tha,Ports of Exportation, could take I)4cli in value
ficient to allow a certain nunibrr tv go. in ballast, os,
(non Canada they pr.ttv to import lII'S year 310,000 tolls lit
Tlalher mid Deals for the consumption of this country;. but
a very large 'proportion of that shipping must out to Ca
nada in ballast, the value of their shipmerits of Timber and
Deals can he taken in a very small amount of tonnage.
Salt bein4 a great article, they 'can have a Eel OM cargo in
Liverpool, but not here ?—1 believe salt is carried-hack from
Liverpool; we hare bills drawn upon us for the shipments.
Has not the debt which kt 3 . accumulated against the Bri-
tish Merchants, accumulated since the peace principally'?—
No, certainly not. .
When did it begin can hardly speak to that, hut when
cattle into the House four years and a hail ago, there was a
debt of nearly 100,0001. due to the Hines, ; the amount has
not been increased Since.
Were too in this trade in the year 1815 ?—lt was at the
end of 1815 that I entered into it.
Can you explain why the Importation Was much larger that
year than an) Other ?—Hariag just entered it, 1 really:ea:mot
explain exactly why it was.
Con you inform the Committee whether it arose from a
speculation from this CoUntry, or a efeire froM the Norwe-
gians'to 'diicharge the debt tine to his Country
as far as our House was conterne'd, not at speCulatiOn
this Country, but a de,ire tot the part of the :•;“.wegians tp
discharge their debt, for We are :Merely a House Of. Agency to
sell the consignmenta sent to us, and do not speculate in Ihe
article ourselves.'
The Witness is directed to withdraw. -
(To be Continued.)

taW INT Fttr,iGENc,

COURT OF CHANCERY, JULY 20.,
frc,
THE LATE .DUKE OF QUEENSBURVS

THOMAS V.. MONTGOMERY.
Thelon') CH• ANCELLOR observed he.had
rmined with. the greatest attention, the calcula;
tion which bad been handed to hirh, as to thv
amount of theJund in Court, and the ame4nt °i
the Legacies, and if he granted what .was 01°a.
by the legatees, it would only leave the'surn °.
.1.26,8001. in Court, which he- thought would bei
too little as •aprovision to meet other claimsthaa
might be made. He was sorry to, be obliged t
say this,.but he could not help it. -
,s
Mr. Mu tt RAy said, perhaps bis Lordship 14'°,L1
give the legatees omething. short of: what Wei
asked.-

there

The LoRD .C.HANcEr.Lort-,--" Certainly, - ~;
can be no objection .to that. Give me a calc",;
la.tion on Saturday morning of a tenth of tlietia
deinand,„instead of a fifth, and It will order it
be paid out of Court to the legatees ; but ./ "0'1;
not be justified .;in ordering the fifth they
for."
Further-consideration postpOned.

• HUDSON V. PEAUCILIMP AND OTUER3.
est
This cause excited m ore thin ordirpry inter
„f
in the Court, .and was frequently interruptetl',/jd
laughter during the reading Aif the ailidavio(l6.
support of the appliCation. It was a motioll 17.1'11,
on the part:of the -plaintiffs by Mr, Vietherci:'
for 'the purpose of restraining the defend".fc:
Francis Beauchamp, from- selling-, trans;:errAlic;
disposing, or otherwise r4kin3- aw,iv with a-3.°i
property named in the. ptea.dill."-s,, and which'„s
present stands in his name. The. circuinst9-I'''-,
of this case,- as state.d by the Learned, C9Lit'r;,;
and supported by a nut'- of affidavits, Ate re, 1
oll?w ;-I.`iirs. Ann Hudson, the testator,
left- a certain propertsy :in the -ninth, rarto
which she' had derived from-her brother, and 'l'l4
remainder added. hy fru 0 gality and thrift t:4l
part. of herself and husband, whom she outlive{,„
to the amount of upwards of 30,000/. 'Fie t;lt
fendant, as alleged, had become acquaititedlvilLe
the affluent ciccutustances,of Airs. lindsoill µ- „e
lived
,in. a very penurious manner. .I3y•
means unexplained
..lhe defendant made "`",,i)
self master of the Lady's , (79 years of 1j.5,4
alfections,.and under a promise of :marl':„,,
a , 1011 his- favour. Mrs. 13;t
011 having died lait .year, the defolu3:l
obtained 'probate of the Wi 11, and the PrcsLry
cornrriehced a suit 'in. the Corth''stjg
Court to set it aside, which is still petzdiug• ,01
' , _
addition to ,the facts above stated, it was ssvlLti;,;(,,
that the testator was net in a situation tocouT
her own affairs ; that she liad ; been treateiiiol
the defendant as a mere child, and that
iet
been
_in the habit of takinco honae't.;cild and s"-04
coins to please her, which he did by ihro'cloi
them inlier lap,,and having sail 'red her t°
them in her pocket.) would take them out, as ./
stealth, and' then please heP.hy showing- ti-,'- ‘;
j.,l'
It was also stated that she wa..4 wholly
.to performing
any offices about. IpetrF.:-4f, au" ",.0,
in the absence of the- defendant one of Ulu 5;1
vants Was obliged to, attend on mid c''` 'l;e
dinner for her ; that ail company, t,,4"%f1y•
invited, and-that eventuallv•-th4defendar".,,ol
tained the sole command •
of -ail:
that he dressed her up-in.
dresses unbecoming her ,
her to leave the house wahout ucconipl sly
-An offensive description of ,tire- testator 4“'s ,eff
sworn to, which caused_the Defe.ndant to sec:heit
_a bottle of strong salts in his handkerchief
he app.roz.:ched.her. The aboVe are the ruo'ittlie
teriaLpoints of the case, affil so strnn,q,lY
Learned Counsel iniPressecl with:the jusi.''o,3l'
" the application, that Itc ail be
pang the detail 'with any reznaiks-of
su,pport -of. thorn. ,
Mr. H Unt'SON resumed the'ob'e"-ro'ns-°
,
:ease being; .noW.prOceeded with,Which .3e ,
4;1
4 r,
used at the co;nnienm ceent,• but ,
to-L
over-ruled. Not 'exiiecting the case
suffered to proceed, he limit not been Pi' iit;kil'
With arr answer, to the affidavits which lia"
read, but he was instructed. to sgv, that the
Of the alle:gations were.false in every Vartlc6ll:'t
,11.1 C LORDCDANC EXAM is expressed at
this w.aid._ be the case,, but, d uner
cuinstances, felt he ought to grant the
as praye4 for. His Lordship thought if
porta.nttolnow how it. came -that the Pi.`);::
was linested in the names of the test.:.tor:
defendant only; 'as an her decease tits. Pr°Vlllf
in question would stand wholly in, hiS Jiwifsoe '
injunction was • according It' ordered :
prayed for. _ 1
ivdlf •
AecinNT.—Yesterday,„ a girl rtarrvs,- t
son, about six:years ..of ago, loft
,t;ot to
to take care of two younger children sv,.'
flt
mother had gone out on some business, s c:i
. raise the sash of the tvindow (one Pair)
Short's-gardens,'llrury-ITie ; -the
suddenly up she was_pre.Cipitated the_k.
and falling on her, head on the,
tured her. skull. She 'was carried of 1`
to the Middles-x oqp itaT tliont. hoPe •
. a ,
•fp
covert'. ceofa
.On Sunday' last the DonnPadvioiT Ye, ~6
• ^tt 11?
respite for one month, from the - ceatekeil
111.‘Ca:!! alias Moffatt; now Under
01-19 el,
of death, which was iinn.a.cliatAy cool' veto'
. ' •,i/t
to blin by the
00,
RR LF,•;D. .
rs'
Yestrsrday John 7s-nr,', 1,1,.1'. rtfDoc•(,i,, yt)
and F,How.of .1 ).-milv C iti.‘iridt:e.., Calv():i ~'„,,e):„.7/
•ti,nglit!.•r ,if-tbe fait; Maris Tlodgson,tsq. oi
difscx.
'•
• ' is4'
,035 age'
ros
Yesterday; the • 114th yeat of his 'age, j_ 00'
Capnin in t lie oval Navy. .41 e, o*l
iVt:drivs.clay:tile 190; inst. i\lr;Jo:,epo
aged 70. ' .
. - • "S,•
I.I.)NDON: Printed by J. T 3. c.A.Rs'rAl“,-,',,liatie,,
Orinond-sii-cet, (Inc ell - e Oi
S(31.1131•S, of No: 7, Siloth I.4olthri-Etrserroti,
Oases, No. 112; Strand ; wherg
Leiters, (post-paiel) must bel'idfcs

)