The Sun.
London, England, 1816-04-23 00:00:00

THIRD INTritItOSATORY.-JAN. *5.

Q. Yes'terday, Generid, in confortnity to, your
request, we acquainted you with the eliarpo
iiting against you, Now tlot voo tote been Sa-
tisfied on this point, we expect to day, from the
nobleness of your eharieter nod your good laith,
frank and preCISC allSiVels to the questions We
are about•to put to you. V.it have nn thotive,
no reason, for 4tiy hanger refoing to furnish 11.3
with the neeti4lary infOrnnitio'n on the subject (ll'
the charges made against you.• Know yon the
hand-writing. ot the pat.t‘er which IpreSent, ett,
titled "'Report' tiode by, Pozzo di Borger to
the Emperor ot all the flossias, on the actual.
State of France, Dee. 181 I"—A. That paper Was
not writeasi by Ine. "know that there are Man'Y
manuscript copies of it in , eirenhtinll. 1 have
-been told it hits' been printer) in England, atter
being translated' iutb Englisb, anti that it has
even been inserted in the. jouroalS. I fitrolV not
the band.4riting (lithe document which you pre-
sent to me ; I have frctittently ink.d copies Of this
report : they were lent to me ; 1 retutoed
As to the author, I believe there is no doubt he
is M, Pozzo di Borg.i." If it is not 1111, I knoW
not who lIAS assumed his tome. .

Q. When pas ing by la Chapelle-en-CerVal,
the Bth inst. ‘vere nut fonr-Frenclrgetylarmes re-
gent when yon changed horses yon not test ,
them that you wt:rc proceedin,..l' to select- canton.,
ments for a part of the English army I will
not have you tAhe tne for a ehild, I Itave declar-
ed that I will not answci• queStions or this sort
I will not. The more you incommode me, this
more you barrass rue, the more you depriyu Ate
of the society of uty 440, my child, and toy
friends, the more. immovable shall you find int
in my resolution riot to answer. Y 914 only pitt
"Ine'icithe';ortiti•e, hot 1 will not answer. When
persons Nave presumed to attack my liberty, is
should only. he clone With acquired proofs of my
culpability. Let the most be made of thei proofs; •
then, before the Tribunal which is to try me, and
I dyfend 105 self. It iny_liberty is taken away
withotil proof Of guilt, i Au the vicfitn of an ar-
bitrary and tyrannical act,' tend it is' absurd to
pretend to I.tectuire trout my anSwerS proofs svhich
'ottgbt to lorye been h had belote not arrest. It is
in .vain to tell me,' that, if my awiwers nre rotintl
satisfactory, I may net he brought to trial, tort
obtain my reject thiS perfidious ad'vatt-
tag& of preliminary hiterrogatitots. 1 win tibso-
NNW, give no answer anywhei c but 'before a
burial; it is needless to tempt 01 sound me 011 this
point 'firy resolution is taken:
Farther he was' not interrogute;i ;old the pre-
sent interrogatto y being rvad (net to bin), he (;(till
it contained bis answer exactly, and sigded it
with us.

(fitEned :As beat.)

rotnyrn isTritßoGAToty, a 43. lb,

• It -ccnnnienceti with questions .05 to leis Mlle*
to %t.;ielt Ole Statile 4118 AV Cl' WO given HS be:.

fore.

. . .
Q Did kitit;thil §)eitr Bruce came to yets on the
2sl or J(I inet, to prevail (spun yot.t to 'sill your
efforts, and to jinni with him in eonveyit,4; laisa
kite ()tit of France deel,tr,; that) will give
no answer before .I have liven perittitiedto Coin-
runnicatewith the English ; he ti;..
psesestor,liere my. cip“:(lnlo6st ; I acknowledge
not, nor, ought .1 to, acknowledge, any ossv but.
line ; and 1 formally protest Fig lillht uhf proeettl-
inco,ushitent with .theils%v of nationii,
Q. Out your being. a foteigner 'Cats give you,'
neither in 111'.311CV, nbr ilt, 41sy othersoisistry, tt
tight of eiensistion (rots) laws important to good
order and the public security.—A. 1 lay .:laim to
no tsLcitiption front rite laws of .I'frioce"; hut, enn-
formahly. to frioseof my own country, I wish tot
avoid an exantination, witls the of Wltiels it is.
litenoti,haure .ittiblie trial, tes .derive advantagts
nostinst sue froni answers which will he the mum
easily torts lions rue, issoSsistsch its) son not very
fsimlltttr with the hogintge. I stAntl Iseevicd ;
the :Pressen Cioternwent is tlty stecnser T, it Sor
it th present itself against me with ploots ; it is
not my bisSiness to furnish them to it ; short,
persist in demanding previously that I el-
lowed so cost uiuniCsste wiiit the Ambassador of
my Country,
. Q. This ressiming is founded:son the prineiphs
of your legislation, hut it does not accord with.
our's ; evety offence must he pro4ecuted end tried
stctording to-the laws of the place Where it loss
'been committed, and our laws Iprosally refw.e.all
ernatuuuication tit, the person .siecusett he tore lse
has sin'tlergosse an ezaissioaiiito.—g), 'flit.; law •,11,
pears to in 4 reptignAnt ',us the constrione:bt itoliot-7$
ut jostiee: it teitkit, to puni,dr.the, oct.7lited hcfortA
he star Liven drel,ised guilty
.it is /i of aorta
torture whir .11 you have stinstimied It; the phpi-
fy4 sortu,-e. Upon tilt it limo, 1 Atli VillY the 01,1143

(Signed)

i .

:let erwinell its :by rerusril ; and I positively de.
vlare, that 1 meld to make no reply to question*
th,ir ,bull be put to me at, to the escape (.4 M. de
Lrf v deter, anti the 'pretended part I have taken
in it.

After several reiterated summonses, the accused
Laving constantly retused to answer flit( questions
which we put to him, we closed the pvebent inter-
i'sgatory ; adding at the same time, as to the de-
mand of General Wilson claiming all the honours
and attentions due tro his rank, that these could-uot
be refused to him, because' he was not declared
guilty. w
The above being read, the accused signified MA
adherence to it, and signe:t with us and the clerk
but, before signing, he demanded that there, he
inserted at the close of this interrogatory the claim
which he formally makes, that this interrogatory,
end all those which preceded it, he communicated
to the linglish ambassadors and he signed with us.
anti the clerk alter this addition was read., -

ROBLItT WILSON.
IWPVY, and D4ROSTE.

(It commenced with asking the name, &C. of
• 'the prisoner, to which the .sainiansv•cr. was given
P
as before.)
Q: Were yivititNaTcql:Rialli°ntGeAdT:vßitll;"--14ja:le9t4t.e before
he *as brOught to trial Before replying to
iiny question, 1 demand the annexation to the
proi:a.verbat of the paper which I now give in,
and which'eoutains my solemn protest against a
Mode of ,proceeding of, which I cannot acknow•
ledge the legality. 1 dennind that this document
he signed and parafeed, ne varietur, , by' M. the
Judge of Instruction and the clerk here present.
Anti having immediately proceeded to read the
said protest, written on the first three pages of a
sheet of letter-paper, we' acknowledged to the
said Siiltr Wilson the receipt and deposit of the
said paper ; and immediately, in his presence,
signed and parafeed each page of the paper.- We
then repeated our first question.
Were you acquainted with
Nei,
before
he was brought. to trial ?—A. No,„
Q. Have, you known him since ; and did' you
sae bins in prison /—A. I never saw him in pri-
son.

Q. Did you know, long before the Bth instant,
that Lavalette was still in Paris ?....A; I have not
-fttaitted the recollection of the date; Gut I think
had no knowledge of his being in Paris till the
3d or 4th of January, and i had it merely from
14(41rsay,
Q. Was it not then proposed to you to enter
into a plan of which the execution had'for its oh..
ject to facilitate his escape from the kingdom ?77--
A. I was spoken to with that wish.
Q. Who was the person who thus spoke to
yon was born and bred in a country where
social duty is respected like public,duty, and thus
my memory is not framed for betrayiuglrlends4ip
and contidence.
9. On Sunday, .the 7th inst. did you not go to
Captain HutchinsOn's, rue du Helder, No. 3 ;
and were you not there in company LANNl-
lette I—A. As I fiave already said, I have not
retained the recollection of slates ; 2'i, in regard
to Captain lintchinstin, I refer to my preceding
answer ; 3d, I was in no company Where I heard
the name of Lavalette.
Q. In that company did you not at least see an
individual whose name might not have been pro•
nounced before you, hut whose person was un-
known to you, and who, from the air of mystery
whiCh prevailed at the Captain's, yon might have
reason to suspects had arrived there with intention
to coin. eat himself ?—A. I never said that I had ,
passed the evening with Mr. IltnehinsOn; and I
apply here the foregoing reflections. '
Q. On Monday, the 8111 instant, did yOu not
go in the morning to the house of the Captain
did yin mint ali4lit there in order to mount a buggy
(boguet) which happened, to be in the street in
film( of the outer-gate; and did you, not con-
duct along with you a man whoin you found in
the, captain's apartment ?—A. As, other persons
besides myself are implicated in these interroga..
miles, I Shall keep on the defensive, and observe
silence.

Do you then admit that you assisted Laia-
!etre in escaping from Paris, then from France,
by conduct►n'g him along with you under the dress
of an English
.officer ?—A. I repeat, that never did
any one appear before me under the name of La-
valette. It is very true, that at the time. of which
you speak, or near about it, I conducted from France
an, individual dressed in a uniform great coat of a
description not at all confined to the army, but
of a kind that every,one can legally wear; and
did not observe that tinder this surtout he wore
a uniform dress.

Q. Under %vhat name was this individual intro-
duced to you.-41. As this individual had, pro-
bably, reasons for concealing his name, Ido not
-think myself authorized in disclosing it.
Q. It you did not know it, what motive could
induce you to undertake so long and so expensive
s journey to accompany him to the frontier ?
,A. Aoly motives are not actions ; and on this ac-
intit I feel anthorized to give no account of them
but I should be ashunetl of myself, if friendship,
or even the desire 4'n:uttering a trifling service to
any °flu whom I believed in a situation to require
i!, were not suit-Went to determine me 'to under•
t,die a journey mita longer and more troubli-
aome.

Then, while you passed by Valenciennes,
Ann wklied to obtair4 a passport, did you declare
your real name It is trim I passed by Valen-
pienues, and, I believe, 1 told my tine name ; btst
at all events, anti even supposing 1 had disguised
it, the safety of the person who 'accompanied me
(mad have justified this precaution, if I had
thought it useful. On my return to France, I
never concealed my name ; and under my real'
it tine I passed! the frontier and the fortified places.
Q. Do you recognise the pass which 1 mention
as having been delivered by yon'at Valenciennes
for yourself and the person whom you accompa-
nied ?--A. 1 donor reniethber

Q. When you arrived at Compeigne, where
you slept, were you received, together. with your
mivelting companion, hy an Englishman or by a
Prencinuttn I neither can nor do I-Wish to

sity any thing of *what is not personal to myself;
at the same time I ought in truth to declare upon
toy honour, that no Frenchman of any class, as
At A I. uOW, lAA engaged in this affair since I

entered into it. This 'declaration applies as well
-to Paris as to other points of the journey.
Q. Were you led by your own inblination, or
at the sugge%tiou of another, to undertake the
journey lit que.stiou,?—A. I.,,was. told that this
journey was necessary for the Interests of the in-
dividual. :I never yet requirathe efforts or
the persuasion of another to lead me to the.per-
forinance of an action that I regarded as honour-
able, and that my conscience approved : honour-
able, because it %sag more than' disinterested : ap-
proved by my conscience, because I am persuaded
that every honourable man, and particularly my
countrymen, from the highest to the lowest rank
of society, will approve of it in their hearts.
The evidence being read to the accused., be said
that it contaittetl his true answers';• that he ad-,
hared to its declarations ; that be had ()Wang CO
change in it, or add to it ; that he signed with
us and the eetk,e as well the present deposition
as the pass mentioned in it, and the protest en-
tered into by

(s►g:ra)

WILSON, DEPUY, and DEILOSTE.

,SIXTII INTERROGM'ORY.—Fen. 9,

Q DII you recognise dee basket which 1 here
nresebt to you, tivd up, and sealed Witt) the seen
.of the Prefecture of, Police p—A. No, Sir; but,
before answeritig- to any kind of qustions, 1 Ile,
wand that at the kept! 01 the proee.,s-verhal there
may be allixed the prQtetit, that .; formally renew,
011 the right which is as,uMed of ineStiotiim;•me.
1 declare, in con4Nittenee, my dila vowal of every
thing
,that !)as
.tor iss object to estahlk!) apnist
myself, ,4efure my trial, etcher proofs tir pre.sutup.
it lotus resniting from this ingnisi«)rial system.
breakinl, the seal.fixe4 to the ends of,th'e'
string, we, presented to him all the pipets eon,
tained in the parcel. We then formed of these
pa tiers five brlndtes.:'
The first of these contained 12 pieces addressed to Lnly
The second contained IR. pieces, CompO,e4 I,,em.)rial
addressed to Lord CostlerCar,h by General
iutention,a recalling to Ins-recollePtit4., •111,,he
rice* performed by the latter in the .11W war b. I
and R,tssia, and the doeinnenti in support oft!,;.,
Tile third bundle contained four original tette'', eetvrring
liiievtist to tile Nlemorial announced ire the second.

fourth contained pieces coniposcd of notes and otever7
Tations.made (hiring. an czeuisiou of the Genelril into
Nlinar and to Mount Ida.

The fifth and the WM cor,titirted sixty-forkr pircry. compoint
of diverc receipts and account's of expence, limit its French
and Ettgl6h.
We likewise fOund in the saute pocket, 13t,
letter addressed to
,Miss. Rhodes, coming front
Triginnd, Hint written it. the English Lingtinge-;
and General Wilson- has declared U) hat' this
lady is the companion of his wife. 2il, A letter
signed 11r.tnie, ‘vithout aftdresvand without date.

'General Wilson Jiaviiig Junked at this letter,
point,.'d out to es that it conkd not be addressed
to biln ; that it WO: easy to attain conviction pn
this stibject by the expressions bordering on pro-
found ropeet contained in it, Ind which weie not
coitsistent with the intimacy that had subsisted
for some years between Mr. Bruce and him ; and'
that, consequently, it was rely by accidental mis-
take that this letter was tound among his papers,
This being dont!, wt affixed nut seal and thet
of General Wilson to the two ends of the suing
tying each of the bundle*; we hare, likewise
marked all the pit ces contained in them, as well
as the letters which do not compose part
,of them.
The reading of the present deposition being one,
thrwigh, General Wilson signed it along with us
and the amanuensis.

(Signed) yi'LLSON, DUPUY, and MOSTE.

SEVENTH -INTERROGATORY.—Fr.n.

Q. Was it entirely from Sentiments of,genernsi-
, ty, its you have mentioned in your 'first ihterro,
gatory, that you lent assistance iu the•eseape of.
valette, or was it not rather with political views,
and in consequence of a marked opposition to the
acts of the Government i—A. I begin by renew.
ing my former protest against thii inquisitorial
system, and passing then to your question, I an.
ewer, that 1 have not named Lavaiette as the in-
dividual that I accOmpanied to thle frontiers ; but
at all events I Agree, that, when it was proposed
to me to save Laerdette, polities had not for' a mu.
meat any influence upon my decision ; and my
conduct has' been directed by an irresistible senti-
ment. of humanity, which would have compelled
me to save an enemy in the same circumstances.
Q. You will agree, nevertheless, that the in-
difference wilily's' you ought tio feel .towards a man
Who WAS noknown to you, and the proftmod aver-
sion which you are at' no pains to colleen, towards
the Government, naturally inspired the beliefthat
this • lamer sentiment alone could regnlitte your
conduct in this Affair ?—A. I have answered as to
facts, Ido not reckon it spy duty to enter into
possibilities with regard to the profound aversion
which is so gratuitously imputed to 'me towards
the rrecnh Government. I declare that Inver
interfered with an act of this Government' in
.whieb the honour and the good faith of my
nation were not interested, and never 'assumed•
the rights as an Englishman to criticise it. •
Q. Why, then, in the affeir of Lavelette—an
affair foreign to your Government-6414140n exert
yourself to cast odium upon persist's whose duty
prescribed to them the prosecution of the charges
against him ? Why did you treat them as perse-
cutors who multiplied their efforts to assure their
bloody triemplr? 'Why did you add that tiny'
had discovered the footsteps of their prey, and
that the escape oC Lavalette had produced no ‘,
other effect but, to render these Monsters snore
furious ?—A. Upou the first article or this inter-
rogatory, I answer, that the affair of Lavalette
(abstracted from the part .1 took in it) was not
foreign to an Englishman. There existed a con-
vention, signed by an English General, and re-
tified by the English Government ; and the trial
of Lavalette was a manifest violation of that,con-
vention. I do not deny that I employed the
words which you have repeated, hut yotr must
furnish me with the proofs of the facts. Itt ad-
dition I may say, that I wished to avoid nil poll
tical discussion : as you have begun it, Ido not
refuse to answer, •

Q. The proof which you demand results from the
letter with which I now relent you ; do riu nowac-
knowledge it, and do you consent to sign it, land to
mark it (parnpher), that it may be identified
In denouncing great et Imes, by which the French
Government have obtained possession of e. !Med,
letter addressed to a Peer of the Parliament of
England, and I acknowledge it, and am ready
to sign it, and to subscribe it with a ne rarieltor.

(Iviare that in object is accomplished. The
silence which I have persevered in; and which has
' been imputed to toe as a reProach, had no other
cause but to put the French Government under
the necessity to unveil its, &wit shame and culpa-
bility in producing the intercepted letter, of the
interception of which I had long been aware.
Q. It would appear that the honour of, your
country could not he the only erinsideration to,
which you Must have yielded in this conjuncture,
since Yon Yourself advance for itirjnstification the
calamity of Lavalette, which you look upon as a
dishouour to the cause of liberty and humanity.—
. A. These two words, liberty and humanity, be-
come the proof of my explanation. in fact, the
word liberty, when well underst;iod, eNprestesre-
spect for the laws.and tor justice. The laws were
outraged by the'vlohitioh of t to treaty, and it was
Alien reasonable to regard this as the eAuCe of li-
berty rand humanity. The phrieies., that I follow
come in aid of the justness of this interpretation,
since in them' I express the'wish that Eugland may
escape the shame of participating anew in an as-
sassination, and that every hottest and indepen-
dent man in Europe may have for once an oppnr-,
fonity of rejoicing in these times of moorningand
ignominy. It was not necessary for me to detail
the various sentiments which animated me, follow-
ing the order in which they presented thetoselves
to my mind : I wished only to draW a getteral pic-
ture, and thine is a great distinction to be made
too o ecu the precision which belongs essentiOlv to
tt lease :iiidy,:,,,,,l,onfideittially to 11
friend, and the oich one des-
tined for the public inspection ought to' possess.
Q Must not the expresSions which you ern-
'ploy to designate those who acted by order'of the
government, and the hatred which you disclose
in the manner.: of describing , the government it-
self, excite a, belief that the escape of Lavalette
was not .your principal object, but simply me-aus
Ih commerscement of the executioa of a,projeet
very Ott of a plot kevionsly formed find
at ranged, todestroy or, to change the government,.
or the order of succession to the throne ?—A. The
expressions tvhielt I itsed were caused by the vin-
dictive spirit which I had remarked in the pt.rse-
Cations directed' against, Marshal Neyand M. La..
valette—persecutious which always appeared to
me an, outrage on die bottom* and good faith of
the Engliihnation, identified with the convention
of Paris. I never meant to point' out, particularly
either the agents of the governmeot or any other
persons .as..cliatgeable with the persecutions at
, which l revdltedi but I meant to speak generally
of all those Whom a furioas, or at least excessive,
zeal led try.calf out for blood, and to oppose the
wish which had, to the knowledge of every body,
proceeded from the Icings heart, to exercise, cle-
Ineney towards DI. Lavalette.
Q. flow can you escape the strong presumption
which rises against you, pt. haviog wished to de-
stroy or chadge the Government—you who have
yourself furnished Hs with this reasoning, and who,
in die letter in question, do not dissemble'that
the facts which you recite may render you liishle
to the suspicion of conspiring clandestinely,--a
stispiciott which you.. announce the Intention of
preventing by communicating to the Duke What
yoti have thine It has always been my avow-
ed and acknowledged policy to leave every nation
indeperwent, ;old not to irstermeddle in the
of their Governmeots; but I beheld with pail] the
English Government oger„in sacrifice the English
Constitution, in order to connect, itself with

- ,
French polities r I should have seen with pleasure
the cessation of that connexion. I never entered
boo any plot Or association againit. the French
,Governtnent : 1 coatined myself to confiding to
the bosom of friendship the thoughts and wishes?'
with which circumstances inspired Joe; this is a
tight born with an Englishman, and which no
one can deny to hint while lte,sintply exercises it,
'and does nut accompany it with any act prejudi-
cial to Government. The Duke who is men-
',tinned in the passage that has been quoted, to
me is the Duke of York,"the Prince Regent's ,bro-
ther, and Commander in Chief of the Vorees.—
The' wish which I announce of communicating to
him what 1 bad ,done, and in order to banish ell
suspicion of.aseltintlestine conspir.cy, is the begat
proof I eanblitag of, the purity of my intentions.
0. Did not one of your friends, in au answer
which he addressed to,y6ta, communicate to-you
his doubts as to the nation being strongly disin-
dined to the Bourbons; and did-be not appear in
consternation at ttie want of proof of discontent
in this respect I—A'. This question has been dis-
cussed in England since the, re-establishment _of
the Bourbons, and it is there discussed sail i but,
you 4mst allow me the letter of Which yon speak,
in order to put it in any power to enter into greater
details. .

Q. The exhillition'of this letter can he Of no
consequenee to you : my object at this momeot,
in reminding you) of the answer,'is to point out to
you the presymed or rather evident meaning Of
the letter. Which had called. forth the answer, and
to draw this. infereoce, pAlpable to the eyes of
unprejudiced -persons, that your opinions accord-
ed with those of yoUr correspondent, although
the latter were in opposition to thoSe of your Go..
vernment, those of France, and I will add, those
of.every friend of the repOse'and happiness of na-
tions.—A,, protest against all responsibility for
the letters of men born free like myself : 24, '1
deny this inductive logic : in fact, if the person
who wrote to me bad been quite convinced attic
conformity of our opinions, lie would nut have
taken so much trouble to develope his own, and
to make, me participate them : in fine, to differ
with the politics' of his Govianment is no crime
with an Englishman ; and 1 will frankly avow,
that the, Constitution of nay country, its inde-
pendence and welfare, are superior, to every con-
sideration fur thu,satety of the-French Govern-
ment, and to repose established ort-tbe ruins of
England.

Q. What you have said respecting the freedom
of opinions rests on a principle which our Govern.
inent and Constitution equally respect. The law
attacks no One for hii private opinions, unless
they have been protnulged. with a view to disturb
pabiic tranquillity; and such is the character of
some singuiar expressions which I find in this
letter, Nod which I shall now bring to your re.
collection «Ifit is proposed to reveise the
actual order of things, the fire must always be
kept alive, and visible in trance and other evurt-

~n+

tries, to torm, as it were, art alarm.beacoe
demand a sight of this letter before Lingle
reply, both for the purpose of ascertaining
writer, And judging of the motives which e
have ins'teed him to make use of such express
Q. There it is : do yea recognise it ?—A.
The writer has authorised me to name him:
tuy brother. The passage you have cited
piece of reasoning-purelyspeculative and hypo
tieal, without any present object; and his it
tion, which" is proved by the-rest of the letter,
only to establish the accuracy/of his
calculi
on the state of-Frattee and Beglaud.
Q. The passage which precedes appears to
to repel this interpretation ; and there BPI
midi' less of hypothesis than of actual fear it
c.XPres.s 4)11. '' There reigns in the ,provinces I
'g
ree -tra»quillity that may degenerat4 inlo
itire act-here:v:B to the views of the‘Sovereign,
A. it is not " the, tiews of the Suvete;
hot " of the Sovereigns ;" which giccs aft
tirely different sense. I ati not obliwed to
ten!lany brother ; he is able and ready to de
his. own cause : but my brother, bentg an en
of the system on which the Allied Powers 1
aeted,which he thought calculated to. prod iCC
evil, and no good to his country,
expresset
rears lest the present system should beetnnet
firmed ; and, to arrive at the end he proposedwished to see all the people of Europe lotto!
themselves in their own atisirs, and teg3;l
what be calls their sovereignty, which is tile
of the Brit C Institution. . This letter, writ
ii English, 1 never publicly eircillatett, cat
bo cited as au unlawful act against the French
vertunent.
e'Qhl'isl:e 11isd betweencr ires-P(ln dSr 1e•
:Lie appears eaers ati( i)dnyienttioLtil
ste
of consolidation and identity, wilich makes
unttnally respousible for your opinions ; it pre
talum ilitoesrteilietottooil
ttilye existedgo,,.e nmitnlibit;thhotofa you ai
ar
r
real intention to effect overthrow i:itolf
find an th
clearly t,if flits el:t:itiiiedrsn,cwtinirable proof in the last
nrinirnis'i says, .." that he must have acti°"'
ns
establish his hopes ; but. it our friendl.-OF4
jeortett
wbarloittlitnegr; seciog but
too much weaktiess," (and this bittoissutil)lPant,rti
were on the poi-It of action), "or
greet mass of the people bestirs itself first' el
tlting that follows will be of 1)6 erect':
A. First, I repeat always my first protest 551
any responsibility for opinions which tit°
proceed from me ; secondly, I believe, 1(1
to•ti..lito:rsaittlicgereilaistoititiss, that my brother does "°"P
paragr
Iny recollection a Critique which I- had 1114(lil
Perry, the Editor of the Morning Chronicle) "I'lB
justiiitays
e‘svnoouit
nttainzuyne4f
jar
atb:su
tulaintarice France whi„lla
fy the :•Npr-ession, out-. frds.7 'Res
t s
l
n
at ii distar
from a!1 business, could or Vrould enter iptosil.i
h.
rd
suppose
he
in. France. • He always recurs to the desire, w"c
Wtv s
his letteatn
)I)sso:yirsiaftteiielcc:inat eigect iii him, of
4e.tslrent I).le'rs'as,ei
rrty
l object, w
should
ee his f
u
other
iiiixed
as
it;-. aid what com
stn tit
no
ptruro:etf.aawnEsdld.t.:elpgiuia)tlrsaeysnvsi:dneiln:li pletely proves dolt llicr
conspiracy between us is, his
ii
iii
opinions. Besides from which it is easy to Conclude, that il.(;t
cr
, atz
odocvttoefrmtolliteincb better
than
"ch
61)36
passage, that it 'relates principally to the sitniall
an
jetri;eltestnseoeuulal.ntilectillicsntlyibout.tiftrit
seet
,tnefiv, inrhtieolitinepichl..;7;
its
France.
Without
riet cs
s presentabl shcnot entitle oxfei
month•
drawn ' of J
id i?ot you
st, write
cilerniiiinu‘.oylact:yesgrt:'°lbiaeldlst lerttov resounded esibitito::,celeal
ytlYill-nr).el;°s‘Yvvect
i'fnturbitoiienioon ins
:git:ti:sit)osi-lis
litit
etl ii4r:rillieeP11:1:1,t114111
ral-ciy is always,
in
tundo."—A. It is possibiliellt
listitarYo.l:l37;
but do not re ti • •• • e that ' •
ale of such expressions, they mos 113; not:
to some nets v°aYt msieither
to "fir
clear What
is the expression Downing-street, wh'
the scat of Government ; 114 the "I"r`
will he turned out," had probably au
altogether foreign to lite French tiovertviast
MUM. add, that I have not formed [IV 3,i10,1
1
nor my opinions in your'revoititiooos: 8",
(
both are conforntable to the. true
vro last ,Ngtvelnber)
%.Evinsiglei:lsiteP:tritotest.
you I"a a lett'
Q. Did not.,oue of your fecoi•st
chief ote,
regret at not seeing some erotoinent sat
and ma'
in France in a situation to please? hooted Ric
mission to which the French pe°P,Le-tzs „tish jon'
so disposed ?"—A„ It is possibie tue,_—', -this (Mil
thals gave an incontestable proQf ;ids of •
exists in one• party, and I have
having I 'receive
parties ; but I do fiat remember
such a letter. °
Q. Did not you say in the Pretence
perSODS. on fretiDelgt OCefiSiOtl'S, 6111(1. (141111: m
di
ss
itn
Write to your brother Sr E idward ii
Wll5 0ti15.°11.1
10
it
the dethronement of the Bourbons a Gond:
able ? A. It is possibleat Yoit3xPl:sismd s °l7osed,
tion tuiderstlod and antecedently e it
case of a system of severity being Pe'he Floe
framed only to estrange the heart t the
from their king. tonna tl'
Q. Did you not in.anaiberletie: an hat oner
news, at once doubtful awl alerrutot'),
ar thin,
increased every day in Paris; and amt. ev " eve
•
bespoke the approach 'of a crisis • men
correspond with any but my telidly:t7eldinttiol,the4
and it is possible I may have transllT tonarke'
the impression which I thought 1 i!it jor
in Paris, which did not escaPe th'e'}"Cut;c4rli!
itatists, and which at last was annoutrc
the House of Commons. ". e to,
conspiracy antecedently averted , onre.s
Q. Does not this language
ire.fearn:i adt-o-ers no
this the fol!o;ttei„rnd
s i ()n si,avvfebriecrihdecarnenso,befil.o°, t:lll,gir
terminate Froposition—
isltorluiecktbwatiltlbebpeeohpettierdofinE. Antieorprei b e
.1110...,e.,4
hthaeyeappiderralaystkedst wa4,11 be
.the made s t
0rw731 tri;Al Y