The Sun.
London, England, 1818-10-30 00:00:00

THE BATTLE.

Round 1. There was no spArriwg ceremony, but Eales made
play rather away front distance, and missed his object. Hall
returned upon him slightly with the left hand, and the mas-
terly science which followed was perceptible only to those
close upon the men ; so quick and precise were the motions,
that until tl,e combatants set-to in the next round the mis-
chief could out be ascertained. Hall fell on his knees on`-
missing a hit. _ _ .

2. A smashing round commenced offensively by Hall, who .
dropped cLuret profusely from the forehead. Several counter
hits were exchanged in a gallant rally, after Hall had re-
turned upon and parried Eales's right hand. The blows were
measured with such precision, and the parries were so expert,
and it was so much a master-piece of fighting .altogether, that
a common ouserver could not tell who had first gut into the
chancery line. Lairs was hit hard on the left jaw, and both
went down in a close tired with exertion. Even betting.
3. Hall got a tine left-handed hit at the head, and he fol-
lowed it with the right, which told also. Eales, apparently
stunned by the hits, broke ground, and bad the worst of the
rotund, but he skewed hut trifling mark of hitting, whilst
Hall's nob was a contused mass of blood.

4. Hall went in tol take all his adversary's fight out of
him. He went with nmch bravery up to his adversary's Mari,
and, alter making his left-handed hit tell, he pursued to the
ropes, when lint h fell.
5. This was a gallant fought round, but it shoved the good
judges that Lairs was the heavi.!st hitter, although the ad-
vantages were reciprocal. Eales went down, and iioth frit
the effects of seven minutes strong exercise. 5t04 on Hall.
G. Eales made cautious movements to get wind, and Hall
was so tired that he dropped his hands in sparring. In a rally
Eales had his adversary suspended across the ropes, no part
of him being grassed, he raised both his hands, and lett him
a character worthy of a professor of national sport.
7. Hall placed a good hit on the jaw of Lairs, but he fell
on his knees in pursuing, his luck. Even betting.
8. Eales parried some good hits, and saved himself most
scientifically, hnt he had the worst of the round, and he fell
with his adversary alike distressed.
9. Hall bad the best of this round also, and after receiving
two hits tie went down.

10. A gallant mill at counter hits, which told, but the ef•

fects sheaved that Eales had most length. It was altogether
a slaughtering round, to the advantage of Eales, who placed
hits home and heavy.—a to lon Eales.
I. Three to one upon Eales went a begging, and Jones
asked Hall if he meant to give in ?—To which Belcher re-
plied, " We shall win it; we have scarcely a scratched face."
Hall affected a ghastly smile, and turned to, as if inspired
with conKdence by his second's stroke of the oil-brush, alias
gammon ; br floored his adversary by a blow on the jaw,
which was the first. knock-down.
13. Eales gathered himself fur tnischief.and hit some heavy
home blows. Hall was beat as drunk as if a quart of blue
ruin had operated upon him, and he fell, hugging his adver-
sary's legs.
13. Hall made a gallant stand, but he was hit senseless ;
and so lunch abroad was he, that he fought with his back
towards his adversary—he fell senseless.
14. Eales placed three hits and broke his ground; Hall, in
endeavoring to return, fell.
15. Hall went in with much gallantry, and placed two
hits; hut in falling, his seconds raised his head, which was
like a stone, and he could not he krought to time. Victory
was proclanne4 for Eales, after fie;lging 17 minutes and 51
seconds.

A second battle was fought between Tuck, a
butchci, and Dent. It was a busy but puddling
fight between men in miniature for a trifling sub-
scription purse. Dent had the worst of it
throughout ; he broke his arm above the wrist,
after fighting 20 minutes, by hitting. He did
not find it out until he tried to tight another
round.

Violets wet e last Sunday picked in a garden at
Richmond. In a gurden by the road side, going to.
Hampstead, are garden daisies in full bloom.
The new street is making rapid strides to its
completion, almost the wlo of the ground
on the intended line of it being now let.—
The part of it which forms a square, in front
of Carlton House, is called " Waterloo-place ;"
ftom thence to Piccadilly, is called " Waterloo-
street ;" and from Piccadilly the street, wh►ch
will form a grand approach to the Regent's Pail,
is to be called " The lteout'i l'arktde."

THE COLONIES.

:F7.sni the lioyal Gazette and ilalianta 4,ll,crtiser, 1.1

[CoWhined from our Paper of Oct. 22.]
iMessRS. Ent•roas,—Your Correspondent A. Z•
having candidly declared, in your 'Paper of the
25th inst. that his intention in publishing extracts
-from the Histot y of England and Junius's hatters,
wits to shew the people of these islands that their
Reprerentatires in General Assembly do not pos-
sess,i-hy any inherent right, the power of•commil-
ment for contempts, generally ; inasmuch as it was
-questionable so late as '1771, whether even the
House of 'Commons possessed such poser ; I beg
once more to offer a few observations in reply,
and shall 'endeavour to thew, in the fit st place,
that no sin+ doubt or question as that mentioned
by A. Z. cvcr existed in the minds of parsons,..
-whose opinions were worthy of serif-mg attentiOn.
The author of letters pnhlished under the name of
Junius, was e idently a party writer; and Cont,e-
Tionziy, en the time alid occasion of Isis writing
opjnion upon that point merits
veto little attention. The extract from the
1 listery of England is nothing more than an echo
or the langnage and sentiments expressed by
(411 d tlierelore entitled to as little respect.
(9 the anthori v of 'Junius, and in con-
firmation of A.Z.'s position, respecting the pow, rs
of t he house of Commons, he very gravely quotes
an opinion expressed by an Attorney-General in
the course of a debate in Parliament, in the latter
of the reign of James 1., by which, 1 pre-,
slime, it is Jttetupted to thew that 200 years ago,
the House of Commons could not give
,lodgment
against persons not members for any thing s?iid
of llone, except in the te.ce the 'louse. This
last authority, unsupported by ally precedent or
judicial decision, I subuin to the better judgment
of the public, is futile in the extreme. But to
thew that Mr. Mtn! uey-General Note \vas wrong
in his assertion, both in principle and fact, and
that the House of Commons not only possessed,
1);t1 had actually exercised, the power of corn-
mitring persons, not members, for contempts,
nearly a cent ory 'before his time ; and further, that
the Colocial Assemblies, (won principles of ana-
logy sod natural reason, do possess the same
potyer, I must again make coasiderable quota-
tious front the case of Burdett v. Abbott: Lord
Ellenbortm,J, in delivering the judgment of the
Court in that case, after citing Thorpt's case,
says, " I an) »ware that this authority in terms
relates only to privileges of personal freedom trom
arrest, and not to the vindictive privilege of com-
mitting for contempts against the %%lode House.
But Oft this latter point, Out to ineninber the case
unnecessarily with a vtiat variety and quantity of
matter, 1 tvo,,ld refer only generally to the case
of Ferrets (very lolly reported in Crompton's
,lorisdietion of Cnnits) ; Trevrinnald's ease in
Dy. 59. ; Thranwis's case in 1529, who
Was committed to the custody of the Sergeant at
/...ns, for a contempt in words, against the dig-
nity of the House ; John Wentworth's case, of
the same hint!, in 1575, in D'Ewes' Journal, 2.11;
and the case of Hall, a Member of the House of
Commons, in ISSO, which is also in D'Ewes'
um froni page 291 to 295, and which
is the titst instance of a libel punished by
the louse." The passage extracted from Sir
Edward Coke's Institute, operates, in my opinion,
directly against the principle contended for by
A. Z. ; for it is there stated, that one, no mem-
ber, offen&ng oat of the Pailiameot, when be
came hither and justified it, was censured for it ;
tinit is, a person out of Parliament had committed
an offence, for which he was taken before the
I-louse of Commons, and there, in consequence of

itvoifying what he had said or done, instead of
'apologising, Was censured for it. According to
the usual me4ning of the word censure, it may be
stippwo.,! that the offender was reproved in words
only ; 1, however, conceive the word censured,
as expressed by Sir Edward Coke, means the in-
fliction of positive punishment, and not a mere
reproof ; but whatever construction may be put
upon the word, it is clear that the House did, in
that case, take upon i'.self to judge of a matter
done out 01 ridiamcnt. Lord Ellenborough, in
proceeding with his opinion in the above case,
says,—" 'laving stated thus much of the earlier
precedents and authorities in respect to the Par-
liament its-lf, and their owl' practice of com-
mitting for enntemp-,s, 1 come now to a period
nearer to ohr owii times, and more within our
own immediate contemplation and view, where
the materials for our judtonent are more abundant,
aud the sources from which they are drawn are in
some respects mote satisfactory. If any person
more than another could be supposed to doubt the
power of the 1-louse of Commons to commit for
a contempt ; if any person who ever sat in this
place, was, more than any other, jealous of every
impposed encroachment upon the rights of the
people, either on the part of the Crown, or of
either flonse of Parliament, or less favourable in

general to clai us of Parliamentary privilege, :i
Nv:ssioy Lord Holt. There is no person at all
cot;vetsant with the disputes that have taken
place in the Courts of Law on this subject, who
is not accluait►ted with the particulars of the case
of Ashley v. NVllite, and how he stood singly and
manfully in an opinion, which was at last con,
firmed by the Houk! ot Lords, in maintaining the
right of the subject to maintain an action in that
ease. The legality, however, of a power in
she House of Commons to commit for breach
of ptivilege generally, is so far from being
questioned by Lord Holt in the Queen v. Patty,
that hut expressly recognises their power itt the
passage which haS been referred to by the Attor-
nev-Grnet al. His words are these ; he said hue
ormie no questioa ot the power of the House of
Cothmons to commit ; they might commit any
than for offering au affront to a Member (which
must be undetstood of ail affront to a Member as

such.")
His Lordship further sayt—" Thus the matter
stands upon the authority of precedents in Par-
liettu:nt, upon the recognition by statute, upon
tie continued recognition of all the Judges, and
particularly of Lord Holt, who was one of the
greatest favourers of the liberties of the people,
sold as strict an advocate fur the authority of tile
totutnon Law against the privileges of Parlia-
ment as ever existed. I should have thought that

vra‘it qn-anli:y of autii,4i'y 'enough 'to ItAve
put this question to rest (which alone .1 am now
considering), that is, whether the House of COM-
mons has the power of commitment for a con-
tempt of their privileges ? What is there against
it Is it inexpedient that they should have
such a power ? And I am now confining t•nyselt to
the limits in which it is exercised in the case be-
fore us ; I have already said that a primi, if there
were no precedents upon the subject, no legisla-
tive recognition, no practice or opinions in the
Courts 01 Law, recognizing such an authority, it
would still he essentially necessary for the Houses
of Parliament to have it, indeed that they would
sink into titter contempt and inefficiency without
it. 'Gould it be expected that they should stand
high in the estimation and reverence of the peo-
ple, if, wheneler they were insulted, they were
obliged to wait the comparatively slow proceed-
ings of the ordinary course of law for th,ir
re-
dress ? That the SpeAcr with his mace should he
under the necessity of going before a Grand jury
to prefer a hill of indictment for the insult offered
to the House) They certainly must have the
power of self-vindication and self-protection in
thuir own hands ; and if there be any authenticity
in the recorded precedents of Parliament, any
force in the recognition of the. Legislature, and in
the decisions of the Courts of Law, they have

such powel."—From what is contained in the
above extracts it appears that the power of the
House of Conimons to imprison for contempts
committed atr,aiost the Horse, either in or
out of Parliament, has never been (levied or dis-
pitted, or even doubted by any Judge in England.
It is admitted indeed by A Z. that the question
has been set at rest, as to the Ho',se of Commons,
in the case of rir Francis Bordett against the
Speaker Abbott ; but with the assertion that its
recency proves the ti4ht was disputed until
a late dare, I would ask, by whom was it dis-
,puted or doubted ? Not certainly by the Judges,
but such men as Jlllllll3, Sir Francis Butdett, &c.
The derision of the Court of King's Bench, con-
firmed by the House of Lords in mat case, has not
altered the kw as regards the power of the House
pf Commons to imprison for contewpts, generally;
but on the contrary, that decision was grounded
upon the law sri it stood at the first existence of
a Parlianient.

[To be continued.]

AUXILIARY BIBLE SOCIETY.

A very crowded Meeting of the Friends of this
Insiitution was held yesterday in the Egyptian
Ilan, Mansion house, the LORD MAYOR lit the

chair.

The LORD MAYOR opened the Meeting by stat-
ing, that he had given the use of the Egyptian
Hall, considerini, this the best use that could be
made of it. This Institution was calculated to
enlighten the minds and improve the morals of
the lower classes ; by doing so, the duties of Ma-
gistrates would he made much easier. His Lordship
next inti►nated, that he had rect:ived a letter from
the Right Hon. N. Vansittart, expressing regret
that be.could not be present, on account of a Ca-
binet Meeting held that day.
The Rev. DANUEL WILSON then read the Re-
port of the Committee. After setting forth that
the progress and effects of tl►e Institution were
not to be judged of by partial appearances, but
by latent operations and general results, it stated
the establishment of the Merchant Seamen's Auxi-
liary Bible Society as one of the happy effects of
this Institution during the last year. The Mer-
chant Seamen's Society was instituted in Ja-
nuary ; its object was to distribute Bibles to
120,000 British seamen, now destitute of them.
Already had they supplied 16,000 seamen with the
avoid of God. It next adverted to the state of
the several associations : some were unavoidably
supported by few subscribers ; others flourished
in high prosperity. The number of Bibles and
Testaments issued during the last year by this So-
ciety was, 1,660 Bibles, 6G9 Testaments, total
2,3.19, forming an aggregate within six years of
14,356 Bibles, .5,576 Testaments, total '20,232.
It next mentioned their attention to workhouses
and asylums, and bestowed high praise on the
zeal and success of female associations. Their
agents bad penetrated into recesses almost for-
bidden to the approath or inspection of our sex,
and they had obtained subscriptions from utlex-
peeled resonrces. Some remarks were here in-
troduced on the salutary effects of distributing
the Bible, such as keeping parents from gin-shops,
children from unseasonable play in the streets,
and servants from idle gossipping. It lamented,
that the finances did not hold out the same rank
as the city itself did in the scale of wealth and li-
berality. The Report proceeded next to describe
the attention of the Committee to criminals in
prison. Thanks were expressed to the Lord
Mayor for having given the Egyptian Hall to a
'Society whose aim was to disseminate principles
which secure to the poor the protection of their
rights, to the rich the enjoyment of their olio-
lence, to Magistrate's the true dignity of their
office, and to Princes the stability of their
thrones.

The Rev. Dr. THORP began an elaborate speech
by congratulating his Lordship on the importance
of the object of the meeting. The value of the
Bible had been appreciated by Locke, who had
said that it had God for its author, salvation fur
its object, truth, unmixed with any error, for its
subject. Rousseau had been one Of the most per-
nicious of writers. He had been found by a friend
of his superintending a young lady reading. The
friend, on seeing that the book was a New Tes-
tament, exclaimed, " What ! teach a cheat, a
mockery." " Fes,•' said Rousseau, "it is a
cheat and a mockery ; but where will you get
such divine lessons of morality:"---(Applause.)—
Bible Societies had a chain of posts from London
to Siberia; yet they neither repressed nor stinted
other charitable institutions. He concluded by
moving that the Report now read be received,
adopted, and printed.
Mr. DaviEs, of the Common Council, after
congratulating his Lordship on presiding over so
numerous and respectable a Meeting, seconded
the Resolution.

It was cairied oonnitnottsly.
ROBERT HUMPHREY MARTIN, Esq. said, dm
we owed civil liberty to the Bible. The effects 0
this Institution were to promote.good- am

fulbt lie 02C-11 the Cone in as VI

(host not walk the streets,- and when a :Jew was •
tossed by his heard, tit-I it was .almost plucked
from, his chin. Ile had lately been to Paris, and
had had a Milanese servant ther.2. When parting
with him he gave hint a Bible, on the 'condition
that he should read it, teach his wife to read it,
if he approved of it, give it to his children, and
never part with it. Ile took it on those terms.
Ile (-Included by moving sincere thanks to the
Lord Mayor for the use of the hall, and for pre-
siding on this occasion.
Mr. M'AULAY seconded The Resolution.
The Loan Mayo': returned thanks, said that he
bad no metits, awl observed that his object was
to improve the morals of the lower orders.
The Itev. HENRY WATKINS said, that if there
was joy in Heaven over one sinner that repented,
how much joy moot there be among the blessed
angels, from the results of that Institution ? The
Bilale was the inag,nti rharta of sinners. Bible So-
cieties -had contributed more than any other
itte..ots to check the late progress of disaffection.
Ino.e who had received Bibles froth them could
take the liberty to think from the Bible rather
than front the Sunday newspapers. There was
one text which might keep the whale district of
manufacturing towns quiet und
things shall work together for good to them who
love Ile moved th4liks to the Vice-l'te-
sidents.

The Rcv. GEORGE CLAYTON SCCOadcd the mu-

It was carried unanimously.
The Rev. Dr. STEINKoPFF gave i. account of
the progre,,s of the Bible Society in Denmark,
Sweden, and Russia, and moved Thanks to the
Trea-,urer, Serretaty, and Comatittee.
The Rev. .1. W. CUNNINGHAM seconded the
motion. Ile lament, d that the City of London
had not kept pace with other places. There were
many great vices peculiar to large cities; the cir-
culation of the Bible was tl►e only adequate means
of counteraction ; London, as the largest of ci-
ties, and the source of many crimes, was therefore
pecul;a►ly hound to contribute liberally towards
tl►e circulation of the Bible. If the poor could be
persildded to set apart a penny in the week for the
Bible Societies, it would teach them independence,
and wean them from parish support.
D,v ID BEVAN, Eig. the Treasurer, returned
!hanks. The balance last year was 7/ 13s. Lid.
After having I►aid to the British and Foreign
Bible Society 1,3351., the balance this year was
151. 4s. I ld.

The Rev. DANIEL WiLsorr, the Secretary, re-
ismer! thanks.

The Rev J. CLAYTON returned thanks, as one
of the C<<n►wittee.

Thahks were then given to the Lord Mayor for
!i4 aide and inifyirtlal conduct iu the Chair, and
he :Meeting dispersed at four o'clock.

OLD BAILEY, OcT, 29.

EXTENSIVE ROBBERY.

Trillium Atkins was indicted for stealing from
the dwelling.house of li. E.'J ones, ►wo watches,
14 guineas, a great number of 7s. pieces, two 21.
notes, and sortie other property to a large arnnun►t.
Henry Edward Smith resided at 4'2, Duke-
street, Goklen -square. On the 14th of the present
mwith his house was robbed. It was then tinder
a state of repair.
John Cooper, a carpenter by trade, was em-
ployed to do some repirs in the-house of Messrs.
Smiths. Witness employed the prisoner in the
house as a carpenter, and had enrployed him for
eleven days previous to the robbery.
Samuel lull, a stone-mason, was employed at
the door-way of the house of the prosecutor. On
14th October, he saw the prisoner go up stairs,
and presently he came down again and went
away.
James Leg was also employed in the house, and
on the day tt►entioned saw the prisoner go tip
stairs.

Frederick Cooper, son of the former witness,
saw the prisoner at a drawer in one of the rooms.
lie was directed to follow the prisoner kt p stairs,
and saw him go out of the house.
Mr. NV. 11. Smith said, that, in consequence of
information he received respecting the robbery,
he went after the prisoner, and fumy! him on
board a ship in the Loudon-docks. He was
searched, and a considerable part of the ptoperty
was found upon his person.
Shaw, the officer, produced t two silver watches,
and some guineas, found upon the person of the
prisoner.
The prisoner said in defence, that be went into
the room where the property was for a chisel, but
never committed any depredations.
The prosecutor again called, said no repairs had
been done to the room n-here the property was.
The prisoner was apprehended, together with his
trunk, in an outward-bound ship in the London-
docks.

Some witnessei were called to character.

The Jury found a verdict Guilty—Death.
Mr. Baron GAartow observed, that it was a
very proper verdict. It was not to be suffered,
that men like the prisoner, who were thought
trustworthy, should betray that trust with impu-
nity.
The prisoner stood, during the trial, with his
arms folded in a most undaunted manner ; but
soon altered his looks and appearance, oi► hear-
ing the fatal e•erdict.--Nut one-fourth of the pro-
perty has been recovered.
Peter Eligwi and Mary Stevens were indicted for
hurglariously breaking and entering the dwelling-
house of Cat bet hie Willes, and stealing a carpet
and a gown.
The ptosecutrix, on the Ist of October, at about
eight in the evening, lett her house, and fastened
the door. When she returned, in about half an
hour, she found the property bad been stolen.
A pawnbto,er at «'l►itechapel proved that the
female prisoner, who cohabited with the titan,
pledged the carpet at his shop on the 2d October ;
and it salesman proved that the male prisoner
offered to him for sale the duplicate -of the eat pet
on the ssme dsy the propevty %VHS pledved.
The Jury tound both the prisoners Guilty, but
recommended thew to mercy.
AI I, BSroit G Ft ROW .-Upon shat ground,
Gentlemen, do you make that recommendation ?
The Fotetuan.—Becanse the actual burgl4ry

lier'n proved if', e\''ilence,
'luny was 'tumid baVe been in the possesli°l-
- prisoners. G
Mr. Baron Gatrnow.—lf V(711 think so, irl:,
Heinen,l advise volt to reconsider your
It Fait thint the burglary was not committed
the prisoners', Of course th.ey must be boll
acluittetl.
The tr-ry 'considered for a few minutes, and rri.,
!tinted a verdict of. Guilty against the stale
souer, and acqUitted the feale.
obati°s
• Mr. Baron ti Rlto w expressed his appr
of the verdict.
Ralph, 1104 ~SOl2, aged twenty-five, wbo 61:
geared lie a soldier, was tried for stealif4 t
`Vi''liato
alue of 20s. prily in shop•
H aoghton,vate a stationer in Bond-stre,elC;
saitl, he teas in his shot or; the sth instant ,4
ridsoner and another person in a soldier's
,'ame in aud asked to purchase a pen-koife,
ta'n•
,be/
went away without buying one. Alter
were gone a few mminutes,hook, followed mod overtook the prisouer,
art
found in his pocket a map of London in a eBse'k
"F
Pocl,ct -book , and a small me morandurn-bon.:3
The witness swore to the articles as having ill
shop mark upon them. be missed a pocket,(
These facts were corroborated by oilier "It.
nesscs.
Mr. Baron OAratow, in his address to the 5011;
observed, that the law which.make q s it a eii•firli
offence to steal above the value of ps. privatidhY,lre
a 5110 p must be well known to thou.
this
were -many eminent persons who thougH
part of the lay; ‘vas bad, and called for ameadolell ;
but whether the law was good or bad, wa":-Itilbil
rpiestion then before the Court, which ‘v"
to adhere to the law, whatever it rni,..;lit be•
law, Gentlemen," said lie, t, is not
we hate nothing to do but act up to the Ic!‘ito
as we find it." His Lortl,hip then proceedeye
observe, that when a July had clearly laid be
them in evidence that the propetrty
stolen in a shop was ab‘ive the value of five 5-4,
ling,s, they were hound to girt!liefro'
jug ro the law, and not from any en (oleo' ;leo
tions of compassion make that prnpe,tY "t
valve that* it was proved to be, by cretOk do
nesses. A delusion had gone abroad aoion4
public on the subject ; and it was i,io do'Y ttr~s e•
Juries right in this respect. In the 0-00'1 C (I,g
the prosecutor positively swore that one (11.‘
articles stolen trout him (the pocket-hook' iiiot
worth ten shillings; the making of it c°latill
nearly that snot. The snap of Loudon was -00
twelve shillings. Here, then, it was ele'irt• five
the property stolen 3S above the vAille I)lthe
; and unless the Jury disheiieve`e-tioce
evidence of the prosecutor, they could o°l t,,s,
the valve of that property below five shillinroaa
The Jury, without retiring, touutl the PEI)
Guilty—Death.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE'
BO W,STREET. he AM'
ExTrtNSIVE ROBBERY.—Yestierday Ste)
clet:'
ris, the watchman ; Jaynes Dennis, (li Is; ; vi, ''-'
Joseph Braid, the footman ; and Michaell' Of
accomplice, ,sere, after a long exatain4fi(4ol'ol,l‘
committed for trial, for robbing. the hc,','s,.e. I t',l„4
Chilow, of Camden-town. Joseph '"sl '''-:
footman, and Emma Owen, the COOS' )sereBlr. '''''l
mitted witnesses for tile Crown. Butt' „wed to
Mrs. Chilow attended. The Lady Se;i;v)el'e
suffer severe;); from the presence of 111 e 6,vcith t::,,
servants whom she had so long trtiste"fi)t,tiets''
utmost ronlidefiee hi their honesty• I.` '
have already appeared before our lieatlers'
Os
61:11,Di-1:ILL. PrOO:'' )trot'
CAUTION TO WoliKM-EN.—George ,•r ,'
brought before the Sitting Alder ITI all , '-'1001e6r:
DOM VI LIAr, yesterday, charged by INI.:.:90 01:1‘
house-painter, with leaving his work, iii„,;ol",le
on
prisoner,
is h
Ludgate-hill,
l s(ll:(
atotee.%-v 1
write
ii
itle The complainant had erill) 'et' h°
,t'
I's
Os sign.
gt
na
r. boardbelek foasi. ISliell):::1:),Iloerrillii1;fr
The necess.rry scaffolding was prerred . litlett:o
and the greater part of the in,criptiont.::i.soo`,
when the prisoner applied to Mr. Culler •,„ I°4:
0 Ili' tti
money oil account, and received ifol►
trot,i co 0
promising to retort) the next morniligll6,o,l,,
Plefe the work. Nothing further h°d,', was ;1,3
been heard of hint till yesterday, whet':in,al,l,o,
prehended. In the interim, the cooll'"i.c:ifilto
employed another person to ‘vrite the i'ls ill, 6
The prisoner pretended he lord hee''_i,etl, Lie
was ready to repay the money he Initl r:reict tioie Ir,
It appearing that this was not the b the of:1)e,
had been charged with similar offeivesloglil'iiit,
thy Magistrate considered it as a eosedv coatio,
ser%jog of punishment, and accorditir 'l. I) c,' 11,
tell hint to hard labour for one rool,ll, Geo.
formation was laid under the statute u
cap. 85 . -------
..,.._ .........-----i --- --- f I`,
-.----- —
_
On Wednesday, at his lißmitsilel;ll-11 'the Strand)
Robertson, Esq. of a sou. ,0'
---- ~,ri ~.,e,
i A RII I . loceph /1!" ie,,i,
Yesterday, at Wait lialllil OW, the Ite,"•,`,%:piersb'„f 0"
NI.A., son of Richard Ark right, Esq..m., 0 Bart• -
shire, to Aline, daughter of Sir 111, Mg"' '
thamstow-house, Essex. b ,oleo
DIED. lace, Lanibi:tc'i° tli
On
wife 2.911 t inst. at Cant erhorY-P,„ce 1- c ' eta
Filson of Mr. If ewling Ltzion. of te, oge. .o.streref
ti7th year ,f her 34e, ant, 4iti of their itv,lif a protocol
On Wednesday. morn:ll4, Mr.. (3, Ha': ~,,bich
Golden-square, caused by a kick of .a h"." ~•0!
,-)0 1
.his head.
------ \-,I) t"-
------..---
to°s'
PROVINCIAL BIRTI-IS, NIARRIAt,,,-
, Sol°
ts• „of Dr.,' 04
On Saturday, at Birmingham, Ili t• Litq fO, C.'
of a dauditer• til efia.°
On the clot 11 inst. the I ad e of the lii4a•
, . ef
of Dcyoll, of a sun. 031tOrP
---....=...---- Ort.
~ to
to ,'•
Lately, Jost' pll It'33d,ilV, E.=q •err' p
15re" 10
Wasperton, near W,revick. rfl JePi
the Lad.Y Q
Eati•ly, Me. Wiilitign nw1,,,,,r5i:1,i:,}:. 4,'
II rlo'J"ilv,%.•li'C'ti ,Niorf.SNt l.
lrai'rttui:,")).sf-11:111I'ite'tce:,-.:;3'itri r'"`.l.;:::r7a':::'tniro.l:::iiss
f
iquioti, of Nev..Towo-Fow, W 1111j111... T . 0 if, 0 r
/1007 Ote
b11:1)•
rG ace Lc° 11,11'
On Friday evening last, Nlrs. ir Sc" g O'
William Lyndon, Exeter, currier. csphaCtl St,
On the 29th lust. at Topsham,
~• 00, ,otpei
/
of the Flora. a constant trader to Cr__ in ,'
- • „--",..-- of rl.b, 4
li(i),..,",,lfbNet2:2:'irit:st.p)',,,:iiLir, ,:ffaT3)r:i's't:o:lj.::::_lis_b__--:rirp,ofi:":,,,,l,
LONDON: Printed by .1. B. CAbS pab i 3t 01
orinoini-street, Queen-square: iota
itrrstrFeer;loo, .
SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South •Nl`)
.advertl',
(Mice, No.' 114, Strand ; ,Olervtdcosco'
!
Lemurs, &C. tot-paid) Most bend
,

P/-"t

1.0-;

la
I,ott

~ ~.

,41.,