The Sun.
London, England, 1829-11-23 00:00:00

LAW INTP,LIAGENCE.-(THIS DAY.)

COURT OF CHANCERY.
IN THE MATTER OF POMEROY, A BANKRUPT.
Mr. MONTAGU' applied on a petition to have the law
notes settled. The question regarded certain costs that
had been incurred, and the Court notwithstanding it COO..
del ed on the materials before it that the costs hid been Warr"
tonly occasioned, still deemed it right to direct the nutter
to go before the Master for him to make an enquiry on the
,eiltject. Mr. Montagu submitted that this could net
have been the intention of his Lordship, because if were'
it would be referring the whole pdition for the Master t°
judge of, and which would be quite against the regular
course of the Court.
Mr. CHING appeared on the other side, contending that
the minutes were in exact accordance with the decree that
had been pronounced, and that it was impossible the Court
could now interpose as called upon, which in fact would
not be to settle the minutes, but to make a totally different
order to the one that had aim eady been pronounced.
The Loren CHANCELLOR on referring to the Registrars
book, found that the minutes delivered out corresponded
with the judgment he had pronounced when the matter wee
before him. If the order was wrong, it could only be:.
disturbed upon a petition to have the matter re.hearde-e'
Hi, Lordship was of opinion that an application ought to
have been made to his Secretary in bankruptcy by the
parties, before the question had been thus brought before_
the Com t ; because then, if any difficulty had been kia.i
the Secretary would, in till probability, have mentioned the''
matter privately to him (his Lordship), and in that
the thing might have been disposed of without the necesaity
!`:.
of all pieties having come in array into Court to-de3w
The petition would have to he dismissed with costs.
A discussion arose upon an allegation that an applicter
Lion had been made to the Secretary, and it was ultimately,,
agreed that the question of costs should depend upon the.
truth subsequently to be ascertained of this assertion.
IN THE MATTER OF ASIIFIELD CHARITY.
The Loan CHANCELLOR gave judgment in this case. As'
long ago as the year 1620, Mr. Nicholas Tinnage left landed, .`t,
property which he then raltre.l at the amount of 3001.
charitable purposes in the parish of Ashfield,
folk ; and also 3001. in cash. One of the purpaeter
was that a sermon should be preached every Sunday folri
noon in that parish, for which the Preacher was to be 11,1`-
at the rate of Bs. per Sermon. The Preacher Was
to '6
appointed from time to time by trustees, who were to be
‘7.1
appointed to carry into execution the charitable trusts. For'!)
a considerable time the Curate of the parish was tbeperiOaf'
who had been apointed by the trustees to discharge
duty. Of late, a gentleman of the highest respectabiat
and most unimpeachable character, though not the Wate
had been appointed. For several years the curate 104'
acquiesced in this appointment, but he had now said &Ili
he would not allow his pulpit to be used as heretoloiet,9.
unless he was to have a pecuniary compensation, or hig*".vel
self to be allowed to deliver the sermons; iberee„,P
fire the question was whether the present L' ••;
turer was to be displaced upon the petition tba!',
had been presented, and the Curate ordered to officiate?.
—The Court saw no ground whatever for la'
pcaching the appointment of the trustees ; the appoint"
ment was to rest entirely with them according to the
ginal documents, and no imputation whatever to be toll:,
in the petition, either against them or the appointees
the slightest foundation. Whether the Curate would shut nit
his pulpit, and thereby deprive the parish of the benefit, it
otherwise would have for his consideration ; the Coll'
could not dictate to him the course of conduct he ought
t"'
pursue—it could only, as it did, dismiss the petition, W.
costs. •• , ,

sEDDEN V. LIDDIARD. • a
The exceptions were gone through in this matter, !11,
n the end the Court overruled the whole, with costs.
Hal"C''''
therior question in the matter stands over until al,,e"r*.
s sold mentioned in the pleadings.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT. 0
SPECIAL INJUNCTION.-LORD TABLET',
BY NEXT J

FRIEND, V. BRUCE.

2
re-

Mr. TENNANT moved for a special injunction, t"
strain the defendant from selling or removing certain col*
and other produce, off a farm, held by the defhdant, under
his Lordship, in Cheshire. The tenant of the farm took
it from year to year. It appeared that the defendant ho"
advertised in the Cheshire Paper the sale of the propel,
now sought to be restrained. By a clause in the 'WC':
the farm was net to be left in an unhusband-like Manner'.
The Coital. granted the injunction. f.tr
His Howona took causes to-day, but nothing of fort`:—
importance occurred before we left.

EXCHEQUER CHAMBER.
FdObe
The LORD CHIEF BARON sat in equity ;,n the et.
quer Chamber this morning, and beard arguments6ll
ceptions and demurrers, none of which possessed so; Pu
lic into eq.