The Sun.
London, England, 1820-12-07 00:00:00

might shew to be but so so, but for her morals-0h ! the!,
would he perfectly safe and pure as " unsunned silo*?
According to Mr. Bennett, a fifty thousandth part AA the Mlse'
:
conduct imputed to her Majesty would have degraded b
so far, that Ministers ought to have sliewn her no futbeatance'
According to Mt. Hubhouse, the whole proved to the
letter would not at all affect the Queen's character for Ma°
rality." " •
" Who shall decide when -Doctors disagree ?"
Sir Francis and Mr: Hobbuttse, in their infinite wisdolo,f
were of opinion that Ministers deserved to be .itupeacheat
but when brought to the test by a man who proposed t" •
they should Move an impeachment against those they df:
nounced, both the Radical ltepresentatives.bad the seng
fight oft, and the resolution was lost. Altvether, never ,c4l:
scene exhibited more contemptible or disgraceful than tho
which it was the lot of Westminster yesterday to s%itness,

[The Times.]
Many persons have expressed astonishment that the !l.':
advit,ers of the Queen do not proceedvigainst some of the
nisterial Papers for the atrocious Calumnies which they 1,4‘,,
uttered, and still continue to utter against iter ,
can easily imagine that libels issuing from a source so fro
dently interested and corrupt may be •thought too W"thic
for any studied refutation, and too harmless to require A
in
serious punishment. . Such writers are merely labouring I"
their vocation. But the case-, we conceive, is altered when:
man steps out of his way, and gratuitously, and withotlt attf
other apparent motive but mere wanton malice, or base sec.
lity,.obirmies himself on public attention as the unprovol",
reviler of his Queen. Such a person, we apprehend,
sop, the gentleman, " with seven daughters," whit, a few o',
ago called_the Queen an adulteress, and, in langnage not vet;
consonant with .the feelings of gentlemen, talked of I':
"escape from welbdeserved punishment." We are, thercfutri;
not surprised to hear it rumoured that the Legal Advo „,
of the Queen'have thought this person a fit subject for rit
secutiou. We shall now see whether a British JurY
":‘,l
'consider the-circumstance of a man " having seven datn,
hers" a sufficient excuse fur a rancorous attack on the bonus,:
of the .first female in the kingdom. By` the way, we r,'•,-4
mention that this excuse, lame as it must appear to a"
ppint.ofjustice, is nd less so in matter of fact ; Mr. 3C,' b'
we hears iuss Certainly at the present moment seven diug,,
ters, though at the time of the illumination he had but si'c'et.
The very day, however. before he wrote hifichivalrous lett t;
another daughter was born, who th4"refore was dragged
the service, to trace, like the Bill of Pains and Penalties)

ea• post facto operatims against the Queen.
. _

•
We subjoin the result of some inquiries made in a resprci.
able quarter concerning the deliberations of the Co:rgresi a.g;
sembled at Troppau. It would thence appear that'Austirel
'has been ore: ruled in her hostile schemes against the inuf,
pendence of Naples: We .should be. sincerely happy to
toed full credence to such a fact. We should rejoice for the 50,'"'
of theAustrianGovernment itself,forwhose welflre;asEnglisi'Ll
men, we are habitually anxious. But we are bound to 3';,
knowledge that our fears are nut yet fully tranquillized 0P7,,
the probable issue of this great political consultation. IL
doubtful whether many of the" potentates of Europe hare'Yr,'
been taught, us their armies taught Buorsaparte, thc,l*o
consequeute of sinning against the •," spirit of the age.
would be easy for the House of Austria to secure the a4oc.
tions of her own Italian subjects. The better classes of ILV.
habitant sin the north of Italy are an enterprising,intelleatlo';
indir-'ritius people, full of vigour, mod prone -to action :
have just tasted of liberty, and of .military glory. Tbe',.
cannot, we believe, be gOverned on the same principles o°.•
by the sante means as before the French- revolution; Tl,r
might be couciliated, but not by a government which distrast*
them—least of all by one whose whole policy is directed ,to the
scheme of compressing the powers ut which they are o°l
scions, and of silencing their claims to that portion dog°
liherty,.of which, under Eugene, though the VicerOy of a se.
pot,
.they were taught the value by its uninalected exereise'
As for the military ioterfmence of Austria with theNcap
taus, our chief reason for dreading that it may yet take OW
is, that we- imagine the Emperor Francis to be sincerely tet:",
rifted for the effects of that revolution on the existence of I,'°
own sovereignty in the northern division of Italy. ,'off
is this fear unfounded. If the- Neapolitans are stiffer"
to enjoy their freedom, sooner or later the ;Milanese and Oef
Venetians must be free. Unless', therefore, the
Vienna can bring itself to acquiesce in the well known
de-
sires of its Italian subjects fur a-fixed representative Coostv.
.tution-, it would be a gross departure front the princip44
whereon the Sovereignty has alt along been ad:9l-
nisteied, to refrain from attacking that system of c00t:1,044
liberty which the Neapolitans hare raised for I betuselve6
the ruins of arbitrary power. Of the wisdom of such a war;
under all its aspects, we need nut, indeed, say much
we mean to observe 13—that its cansistenev, on the Part
the Austrian Government, may be acknowledged with cr'7
little hesitation. •
• " Private letters from. Troppau of the 24th November. 34
received yesterday, from a source of info: mat ion entitled t°
credit, confirm- the assurance previously given of a puiLi6
termination to the deliberations at Troppm. This results_
however, it is hinted, owes nothing to the good disposition
of the EMperor of Austria, who has been strenuous in urgiogi
-united opposition to the newly-manifested principles
liberty, but who, compelled to yield to the llcterminatiott.t4
the other Sovereigns to preserve the peace of Europe, 112*
• hea9l, fact„outs „tea in Ike Congress. 'floe arrival Of th'
Crown Prince of Prussia at Troppau. Is said to be in coo ;se'
quince of an alliance on the tapir with one of the (taught°s
of the Emperor of Austria."—“Lid.)

[-New Times.)
We again most earnestly call upon the loyal Members
the i'uninion Council, if they are men, if they have the
and energy of men, and are not cowed and intimidateti'll*
domineering and seditious Press, to stand forward and imitate.
the honourable example of the Court of Aldermen in'eotiog
is Loyal Address to the f'ing. Fearful that the proceedioP
of the Court of Aldermen, it fairly reported, would have tl'e
effect of animating the well disposed to a similar measUr4'
The Radical Gai-ene of yesterday had recourse to one of tl'e•
must atlaci.ais impositions'ever practised on Vie credolillf
of the public. It put forth a pretended Report, whico
we distinctly assert to be grossly and. wilfully false!
'Phis is a raost atrocious lisult. to its- readers. Tlief
have s right to expectses report, if not miuutely accurate, re-
at least substantially tree ; but we repeat that the report is
The Times was false, wickedly, wilfully false,• and that in it°
most essential parts.—Mr. Alderman Christopher Smith
it
represented to have said, " He,was of opinion, that the Ait.
niSters ought to go out ,"--,AN'e have the best authority it
".
asserting in the must distinct and positive terms, 'that O.
Worthy Alderthan never uttered any such words, ,or
words to that, or the like
.eifect.—Mr. Alderman HefrAt°,
is stated 10 have said " unleSs the Worthy Mover Cu'
the Conti consented to • include in their Address their
dissatisfaction on this stihject (the conduct of • 1%1.d."-
sters towards the (sheen), he could not join in 31
Address that shonld seem, even by its silence, tv approve 0
such proceedings." This statement also, we hare strong ter
SOH to believe, is a grass. misrepresentation. However, tiele.
worthy Alderman will probably take an opportunity in tb
course of the present day to.state-exactly wt at he did say'
this subject. ' I:ven-the-Itaterriat of the divisioti-; we ll'afe
reason to believe ,ritentiostally inaccurate. It we are riglttlf
informed, the question of presenting a Loyal Address,
is represented as only having- been carries by 8 to t,
W 34
really carried. by 10 to 5. We believe that Sl'r C. Flowery
-who is entirely omitted in the account of The Times, vote 4
for the Addiess ;' and that Ahlernian Heygate, who is mice'
settled to have voted against, did in fact vote for it. On the'
points,also, sortie explanation will probably he given in tii°
coarse of this day's proceedings. Such are the consequerire;
Of the shmneful and surreptitious system lardy. adopted
-,publishing the proceedings of the Court of Aldermen, a pr3='-'
tice which it behoves the Court, out of a regard I'o its Liol
dignity, to put an end to by -strict investigation acrd rigor
punishment,- • - •

-Hail. t • •
On the sth -inst., at his house iu Upper Seyraour-iteceto
Porruiart:square, the Lady of Hans Busk, Esq., of a datq,litcr"

On Sunday, at the Rhyd4l, in the county of Worcester,
he 50th year of her age, the Lady of Sir A. LeChroete, Barr.
Yesterday morning, Elizabeth., wife of Mr. TbUitlaS DOW/
Que'enliethe.
At Drumshallon, County Louth, on the 18th nit., in.
94th year of his age, Peter Kelly, a famous huntsman.
rte,
fle,
was employed by the Old Boyne Hunt for several years, .0th'
.after they dissolved, by the. Gentlemen of the county Lou
Ile hunted, seventy successive seasons,, and was a man of OP;
unordinary talent in' his profession, and was never confines'
by illness until within a few days before his death—lie- was an
honest man.

LONDON: Painted by 3. B. CARS'FAIRS, of No. 29. (31.`'t
Ormond-Oreet, Queen-sqoare; and published tiv W.
SCIttIIPS ('E, No: 7, Smith Moltoh-Atreet, at THE Sr."
Otllce, No. 112, F.trorl ; where Advertisements,
tmteig, Ste. (rost-raid) must be addressed.