The Sun.
London, England, 1820-10-10 00:00:00

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1820.

CON TRACT FOR FLOUR.

ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR SEAMEN, AT GREENWICH,

October 4, 18-20.

~.15C11 Persons as may be willing to Contract
for supplying this Hospital with Five Hundred Sac
ks
of FLOUR, may deliver in thel. Proposals to the Directors
of the said Hospital, at this Place, on SATURDAY, the
14th instant, at Eleven o'Clnek in the Forenoon ; and iH the
mean time be furnished with Forms of Proposals, and ac-
quainted with further particulars, by inquiring at the
Steward's Office here.
N.B. No Proposal will be received after the hour aforesaid,
nor will any he attended to that are not agreeable to the said
Forms; MA" unless the Partiespersonally appear.

LONDON JOURNALS.

[DAILY EXTRACTS.]

FROM THE MORNING PAPERS.

[Morning Post.]
THE QUEEN.—The EXAMINATION of her MA-
JESTY'S WITNESSES was yesterday resumed.
Careful to abstain from imitating the conduct of
those who have so illiberally attacked the per-
sons who have given evidence in behalf of the
prosecution, we shall not say, because in the case
of the defence some things have transpired which
we cannot reconcile with other statements that
have come from the same quarter, the parties
must therefore be perjured. We cannot, how-
ever, refrain from calling on the public to sus-
pend their judgment, till it has been seen whe-
ther witnesses may not be produced (which we
have good reason to believe will be the case), to
reply to some of these, in a manner that will
strip them of that claim to credit which many
are at present disposed to allow them, and re-
move all doubt on the subject. The old joke

that one Englishman can beat five Frenchmen at
any time, is, it should seem, to be improved
upon, and it is now to be understood, that
one Englishman can swear down ten Ita-
Hans. We shall soon see the true character
of some of the witnesses. Several of them
have stated that they never saw any thing
improper in the conduct of her Majesty, but
when asked if they have not said that it was such
as to drive away from her those who had any
regard to character, " they have had no distinct
recollection,"—" they have been satisfied that
they have not," or they " could venture to state,"
that such was not the fact. Dr. Holland was
an exception. He swears positively that he had
not said, " a person ‘l,ho 11)(1 any regard foa cha-
racter could not remain in the service of the
Princess." This is certainly a statement of some
importance, and we will not assume that it can
by possibility be contradicted. Dr. Holland ad-
mitted that it was at dinner-time he had the
principal opportunities of observing her Royal
Highness ; he knew nothing of her conduct for
the last five years, and during the short time he
was in her service Bergami had not received his
honours and estate from her, 'but was merely a
menial servant.

[Morning Chronicle.]
Every day advances the CAUSE of the QUEEN.
Aniong other important parts of the evidence of
yesterday, was the complete demolition of the
evidence of Sacchi. What a contrast between
the clear, firm, and ready manner in which Carlo
Forte answered the questions put to him, and the
manner of the partisan Sacchi ! There hardly
now remains a witness for the prosecution whose
credibility has not been completely shaken. We
believe the only individual who has yet escaped
is the wafter at Trieste. But we can have little
doubt that his evidence will in good time be pro-
perly disposed of;' when we reflect on the very
confident manner in which her Majesty's Counsel
spoke with respect to this pqrt of the case. We
have not heard how many Iv itnesses remain to be
examined. Her Majesty very naturally may wish
not merely to destroy the authority of the wit-
nesses against her, but as far as possible to fur-
nish a contradiction to each particular circum-
stance injurious to her honour, to which they
have deposed. She has, however, already stated
more than enough to convince every reflecting
mind that the prosecution originated in a conspi-
racy ; and in any Court of this Country she
would be secure of her acquittal. The subdued
tone of the Ministerial Press is a sufficient indi-
cation of the impression which has been made by
her Majesty's evidence. In fact the adherents
of the Ministry are now heartily sick and hear-
tily ashamed of the business. They are quite
cast down and disheartened. But what must
those who have had an active hand in getting up
the proceedings now feel ? The evidence for the
`Queen having taken so decisive a turn, the
anxiety of the Public is now much diminished.
Indeed, no one now entertains the
_least appre-
hension for her Majesty.

[New Times.]

Yesterday the following Wrr..:EssEs were ex-
amined for her MAJESTY, viz. Dr. Holland, Mr.
Mills, Joseph Teuille (a Frenchman), Carlo
Forti (a courier), and Lieutenant Flynn, of the
Navy. Dr. Holland left the Queen at Milan
about June, 1815, and he, like Lady Charlotte
Lindsay, says he saw no improprieties in her
conduct. Mr. Mills saw no improprieties in 1817
at Rome, where he staid twelve days ; in 1819, at
Pesaro, where he staid two days ; and in 18'20,
again at Rome, where it does not appear that he
saw her Majesty above one day.— The French-
man proves Bergami'J:highest elevation in the

"