The Sun.
London, England, 1845-06-18 00:00:00

THE CRAWFORD AND LINDSAY PEERAGE

The further consideration of this claim was resumed to-day.
A considerable quantity of documentary evidence was put in, and
the further consideration of the claim was adjourned sine die.

The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat on the Woolsack at
the usual hour.

SCOTCH BANKING.

The Earl of RIPON gave notice that, on Monday next,
he should move the second reading of the Scotch Banking
Bill.

SANATORY REGULATIONS.
The Marquis of NORMANBY said that he had given notice
of a petition to be presented this evening on 04lb-subject of
sanatory regulations, but before he proceeded to present it he
might mention a statement which had been put into his hand
connected with the same subject, and coming from a particular
body of men—the journeymen tailors of the metropolis. The
subject, he might add, had been greatly discussed in Man-
chester and Liverpool. It appeared from that statement
four-fifths of the clothes made in London were made in the
lower classes of dwelling-houses in the East-end. He (Lord
Normanhy ) had himself seen in houses of that character clothes
which were evidently not intended for the classes of persons
who were likely to visit in those places, and he believed
that they were made up for some of the West-end clothiers.
If the Noble Lord opposite would allow him, he should put
put a general question to the Noble Lord as to whether
the measure promised by her Majesty's Government was likely
to be brought on in the other House. He should also wish to
ask a question with respect to places of recreation, and parti-
cularly with reference to that piece of ground near the Peni-
tentiary—a place not far removed from their Lordships--
(Laughter)—and which he supposed might be applied to this
purpose.
The Duke of 13UCCLEUCH said that with respect to the
first question he believed it was the intention of his Noble
Friend in the other House (the Earl of Lincoln) to bring his
Bill forward that evening; and as regards the piece of ground
near the Penitentiary, it had been let some time
ago to Mr. Cubitt for 3001. a year, and aeeording to the
provisions of the Act could not be diverted to another purpose.

LEEDS AND WEST RIDING RAILWAY.
A NOBLE Loan presented a petition in favour of the Leeds
and West Riding Railway Bill.
Lord STANLEY presented a petition from the General
Assembly of Canada, praying for some alteration in their com-
mercial relations with this country.
LANDLORDS AND TENANTS (IRELAND) COM-

PENSATION BILL.
Lord STANLEY postponed the second reading of the Irish
Landlords and Tenants Compensation Bill till Tuesday next.
DEATHS BY ACCIDENTS COMPENSATION BILL.
On the motion of the Earl of LYTTELTON, the Death by
Accidents Compensation Bill was reada third time and passed.

DEODANDS ABOLITION BILL.
On the motion of Lord CAMPBELL, the Deodands Aboli-
tion Bill was read a third time and passed.
Earl POWIS objected to the Bill.
Lord HATHERTON said Canal Companies were in favour
of the.measure, and that it originated from a deputation of

their body, which met last year in London. The Board of
Trade were satisfied with the measure. Mr. Gladstone
had taken it into his own hands, and it passed through the
other House without any objection being raised to it.
After a few words from Lord DALHOUSIE and Lord Powis,
the Bill was read a third time and passed.
CANAL COMPANIES CARRIER'S BILL.
On the motion of Lord HATHERTON, this Bill was read a
third time and passed.
EDUCATION IN IRELAND.
_

The Bishop of CASHEL rose to present the petition of
which he had given notice, with respect to Education in Ire-
land. After presenting a number saf petitions from several
places in Ireland, against the present system of national educa-
tion in that country, he said that there was one petition to
which he begged to call the special attention of their Lord-
ships. It was signed by 1,360 clergymen of the Established
Church in Ireland, who earnestly prayed that some por-
tion of the public funds should be given for the schools
in connexion with the Church Establishment. The
Right Rev. Prelate then referred to the changes which
had taken place from time to time in the documents which
emanated from the Board of National Education, relative to the
reading of the Scriptures, and contended that it was dangerous
for Protestant children to aatend these schools. He then read
the opinion of the late master, who had given up his situation
at the London University because the pupils would not be per-
mitted to be examined in their knowledge of the Scriptures.
This eminent man had designated this proceeding the " Anti-
Christ of utilitarian unbelief." The Rev. Mr, Woodward
had also pointed out the danger which attended Protestant
children by this mixed system of education. He could men-
tion, too, the name of a gentleman whose name bad already
been before their Lordships. He meant the Rev. Mr.
Mackesey, who, in writing from Monkaland, on the subject of
establishing a Protestant school in that place, to a neighbouring
vicar at Clonmel, said he was favourable to the national sys-
tem in so far as considering it the next best thing when it was
impossible to establish an Episcopal school. Mr. O'Connell
had lately expressed himself against a united system of edu-
cation, and, in a most extraordinary paper, put forward by the
bench of Catholic bishops, the youth of Ireland were exhorted
not to attend any of the lectures of the national schools, unlesa
they were delivered by members of the Roman Catholic
Church. The only Society which had yet established a suc-
cessful plan of mixed education was the Church Education
Society, who had founded upwards of 18,000 schools, and who
annually educated 800,000 children, 32,000 of whom be-
longed to the Roman Catholic Church.—( Hear' hear.)
He referred to a case in which the priest of a parish in Ire-
land denounced the parish school from the pulpit, on account
of the education pursued in it, and the very next day the school-
master was murdered in the streets of the town. Since the
establishment of the Educational Board ignorance had increased
instead of being diminished. From 1701 to 1831 education
increased ; but from that time to the present it had gradually
descended to zero.—(Laughter.) He referred at great length
to the report of the Census Committee to bear out these state-
ments. Through that Board, which was supported at an ex-
pense of 70,0001. a year, they were indebted for the ignorance
which prevailed in 1 reland at the present moment ; and, be-
sides, it had displaced, and rendered in a great measure una-
vailable, the exertions of charitable institutions founded for the
promotion of education in Ireland. As a sample of the incom-
petent persons who were appointed to conduct education in
the statistical schools in Ireland, he said a man, named Trim,
who had deceived and humbugged some Protest persons as pro-
fessing their faith when it was found that he was a hypocrite—
was appointed to the mastership of one of those schools.
When incompetent persons were appointed to such important
offices, how could they expect education to flourish ?—( Hear. )
He would therefore say that there was more chance of kindness
from the Roman Catholics of Tipperary than they had from
the Parliament of Great Britain.—( Hear, hear.) He con-
sidered that thorough education could never be carried out
until they acted up to the spirit of the seventeenth report of
the Commissioners who had been appointed to inquire into the
state of education in Ireland, and again established the paro-
chial schools.
The Earl of ST. GERMANS desired to make a few re-
marks on the speech of the Right Rev. Prelate who had just
sat down. From his connexion with Ireland he was enabled to
say that the proposition which had just been made to their
Lordships was one which they could not assent to. The Right
Rev. Prelate had found fault with the construction of the
Board of National Education, but he forgot that the motley
which was appropriated-for this education was taken from the
whole community, and not from any particular sect; and he
(the Earl of St. Germans) considered that all parties should
be represented at that board. Great objection had also been
made in reference to the reading of the Scriptures. Now, he
contended that the Board of Education had used every endea-
vour to meet the wishes of all parties in reference to this
point. They neither enforced the reading of the Scriptures,
nor did they preclude their admission from the na-
tional schools of Ireland. They certainly pruvided that no
child, whose parents objected to his being present at any
religious instruction, should be present while such instruction
was being given, and for that purpose they appo nted particular
times for the communication of this instruction, different from
the time set apart for the ordinary literary instruction ; but
while they did so ample provision was made that all children
should have such religious instruction as accorded with the
wishes of their parents or natural guardians. It was rather
strange, too, that the Right Rev. Prelate had objected so much
to the reading of the scriptural extracts, for he found that the
Bishop of Down and Connor had, in a sermon which he
preached some time ago, denounced the reading of the Holy
Scriptures without note or comment by children in schools.
There was one circumstance which he considered ought to
have considerable.. weight with their Lordships. The Pres-
byterians were not less attached to the Bible than the members
of the Established Church; and it was notorious that throughout
the whole extent of Ireland the Presbyterians had supported
the present system of national education, believing, as they,
did, that the free circulation of the Scriptures was amply pro-
vided for. There were 944 schools in Ireland in which the
Scriptures were read, and 1,340 schools in which the scriptural
extracts were read, but all the books which were used con-
tained a body of sound religious instruction. Time would not
permit him then to read a few extracts from them, but he
hoped to do so on a future occasion, and he
was quite sure that their Lordships would be agree-
ably surprised to see the kind of books which had
been so much denotteced.—( Hear, bear.) The Right Rev.
Prelate had alluded-to Mr. Woodward. His opinions, how-
' ever, might be quoted as much against the Church education
system, which the Right Rev. Prelate had advocated, as
against the Board of National Education. He was opposed to
a united system of education, and he way also of opinion that if
the main body of the clergy in Ireland could speak oat, they
would be found to be in favour of the national system of educa-
tion at present in Ireland. The Noble Lord here recited the
opinions of the vicar of Newry with respect to the state of edu-
cation in schools which he had visited, and which were to the
effect that the children were well informed in the Scriptures,
and were receiving a good education. He (the Earl of St.
Germans) therefore held that the fault was not in the system
of education itself, but in those who did not lend their aid to
carry it out with greater efficiency, and that the assertions of
the Right Rev. Prelate were incorrect. He considered that
the statement of the. Right Rev. Prelate, that a Mr. Osborne
had refused a site.feil. schoisl, was not unlike the conduct of
other landowners. He held that the extraordinary statement
that education had diminished during the last ten years was
fallacious, and must have arisen from some misstatement on the
part of the Board of Education. It was absurd to say that
education had decreased, for great exertion had been made to
disseminate school books, and to extend education in Ireland.
He entreated the House to pause before they gave a consent to
the proposition of the Right Rev. Prelate, for it would hava
the effect of destroying the National Board, and would lead
to serious consequences, not only to the Protestant but to
the Roman Catholic religion.
The Marquis of NORMANBY said he had excellent op-
portunities, during the four years he was Lord Lieutenant of
Ireland, of becoming acquainted with the course of edu-
cation pursued in the schools, and could bear testimony to
the good effects of the National Board of Education in Ire-
land. The Noble Marquis then read a long letter of the
Rev. Mr. Mackesey, respecting his conduct in the parish of
Monksland, in which he performed clerical duties during the
temporary absence of the minister, and to his subsequent re-
buke by the Bishop of Cashel, at his visitation at Lismore, in
which he positively asserted that he was so rebuked because he
made some suggestions with respect to the schools in that parish.
He was sorry that the Right Rev. Prelate had thought proper
to allude to the circumstance again, because he believed their
Lordships had been willing to allow the matter to rest with the
explanation he had given on a former occasion, in behalf of the
Rev. Gentleman. There was no other point upon which be
wished to correct the Right Rev. Prelate. The Right Rev.
Prelate was under the impression that the schools of the ;light
Rev. Dr. Henry, of Armagh, were confined to the children of
one sect only, but the Right Rev. Prelate was never more
mistaken.

The Earl of WICKLOW thought their Lordships' time had
been too long occupied with this correspondence, considering
that the circumstance to which it related was of a trifling and
unimportant nature. But the Right Rev. Prelate had re-
peatedly explained the matter, and ho hoped their Lordships
would hear no more of it. (Hear, hear.) Now, for one
word on the subject immediately under discussion. Their
Lordships would, doubtless, remember that when the national

system of education was first proposed he did not object to its
principle ; but he objected to its introduction then, because it
went to destroy one of the most useful and beneficial systems
of education that had ever prevailed in Europe. He meant
the Kildare-street Society, which, at the time, was rapidly
advancing in Ireland: The question was, then, what
was to be done under existing circumstances. A more inju•
dicious thing could not be done than to destroy the national
system. Theoretically it was excellent, and if it were properly
used he knew nothing that would tend more to advance the in-
_ _

terests of Ireland ; but unfortunately it was not so.

Unfor.

tunately it was decidedly opposed on its introduction, and chat
opposition had been continued down to the present time. The
result had been that the system had proved a failure, and so it

would remain, until the Government consented to accede to

the prejudices, if they would have it so, of the Church people,
and placed the schools intended for the instruction of Protestant
children under the control of the Church School Society.
While acting most judiciously, most wisely, and most politi-
cally to a great portion of the Roman Catholic people of Ire-
land, let Ministers show to those connected with the Church of
England in that country that they did not forget them. Let
them do this, and they would give universal satisfaction to the
people that were now arrayed against them, and they would at
the same time show that they were not inflamed by a strong
bias in favour of any powerful party in that country. Let them
do this and they might rely upon it the people would begin to
think that the great object they had in view was to hold the
scales of justice with an even, steady, and impartial hand.
After a few words in explanation from the Marquis of Non.-
MA NBY and the Earl of CLANCAItTY, which did not reach the
gallery,
Lord MONTEAGLE said he was rejoiced to hear the Noble
Lord, who had just addressed the House, bear important testi-
mony to the efficacy and practicability of the national system
of education. The Noble Lord's testimony was of no small
importance, because there was no one who had had better op-
portunities of observing its operation than the Noble Lord, and
no one who was more disposed to discuss the question before the
House with greater impartiality. It appeared to him ( Lord
Monteagle) that the Noble Lord had by his excellent address
completely overturned the studied and pains-taken
arguments of the Right Rev. Prelate upon the subject. That
was no small extent of religious instruction, comprising, as it
did, extracts from the Acts of the Apostles, the Gospel of
St. Luke, and all the principal passages of the Old Testament.
He would now compare the system of the Kildare-street So-
ciety with the present system os national education, and their
Lordships would at once see that the school in connexion
with the latter Society was far superior, even in point of reli-
gious instruction,• to lhoseof the former Society. The Noble
Lord then read the opinion of Mr. Beevers, the secretary of
the former Society, to corroborate this opinion. He (Lord
Monteagle) thought, that by providing support for the Church
Education Society, they would be setting up a sort of anta-
gonism in education in Ireland, which would be attended

With the most pernicious consequences. He was sorry-to•see
so many as 1,700 of the Protestant, Clergymen of Ireland, who
still protested against that system of education there. He knew
the difficulties which the Government had to contend with,
in opposing a request which had been made by so respectable
a body of individuals. He thought, however, that they were
partly themselves to blame in contributing to induce the belief,
on the part of those persons, that on their accession to power
they would either abandon the best system of education in Ire-
land or allot a portion of the public funds for the support of
schoo!s in connexion with the Church Education Society.
The working, however, of the system was the best refutation
which could be given to those who were opposed to it.
The Earl of CLANCARTY said that as he had presented a

number of petitions in favour of the Church Education Sovicietcy,,
he was desirous of giving his support to the proposition h
had been introduced by the Right Rev. Prelate. Mac had
been said derogatory to those clergymen who had opposed
ii
the
present system of education, but no one could onestl°,4obin
sincere feelings by which they were influenced. ThPeel, 0
Lord then proceeded to quote the opinions of Sir R. of
oas
expressed by him, in 1839, against the present system
tional education. Had not then (continued the 'Noble Lord)
the clergy of the Established Church good ground to hope
on the accession of the Right Hon. Baronet some changenat
be made in that system ? Sir Robert Peel, however, was
alone in the expression of such an opinion. The Right Host
Baronet the Secretary for the Home Department had
a speech made about the same time, given utterance toin
don
ould
disapprobation of the present national system of educe..
Ireland. In conclusion he hoped the Government wiere
sider what was their duty to the established religion ""
country.
The Archbishop of DUBLIN said he would not ertr,sott
length into the subject, but would state some of the l.'s w_eas
his experience, which might have the effect of dissipating. s 08
of the misapprehensions which prevailed on the subjee.ta,,,seai
had held his office as one of the Commissioners of the treii
Board of Education under seven Lords Lieutenants ter, be
Secretaries for Ireland, and during the whole of that period
fps
had always considered it his duty to serve the Gevert?rold ant
comp time being to the best of his ability, so long t
doped it the
romise his conscience, and he had always considhi
duty of those who held offices like the one he he PI
aloof from all political parties.—(Cries of
be
When the present Government came into .Irree wee
applied to them to state their intentions wit° their
to education in Ireland, and their not deeiaring
_of
intentions for some time he considered one of the e!_nrsties
apathy on the part of Protestants with regard to eaussLikt
in Ireland. It was proposed that an additional gra.nt_7o-0,
" Hear._De7
be made to the Church Education Society. Let tbeTte„ at
sides what would be the immediate results of such Drool
that. Its adoption would lead to the secession frost? 'I
Quid
wo
of its Protestant, and of the most influential of it!no
Catholic members, and two rival systems of edneatt
0.
be established in Ireland. He denied that the systenm Lr„„,t
education had failed. If that mode of education have the
exist, many large districts in Ireland would not two
benefits of education afforded to them at all. To sePlinid
systems of education out of the funds of the Staley :ods.
an Irish system of Government. It was totally on tb iv
tion that the Scriptures were excluded from these sal:ol_sod the
supposition arose
child scholars not being foreed
.4,0001
Scripture, that no was compelled to read them t_rwee not
to his parent's wishes ; but to sa that the Scriptureae' cod, eeri.
read was untrue, as Scriptural lessons, carefullyrlPheard
used in all the schools. Anything that they b bolos to
respect to Dr. Arnott's wishing to force the sc t the re°
the Scriptures was untrue, as he was of opinion allot of
ing of them by children should be optional on the art 1,7
parents. He could assure their Lordships that 11°.;adePtehed
taken place in the system or principles of eduelttl°tsbieb {or
except in the rules for the guidance of the teacher.!' oleo
been improved from time to time, as the necessoitbsdbetehe
the purpose of carrying it out with greater cffeetLainess otiit
said that they paid little or no attention to the 'To wiu'osim
Board, and that they signed 'papers and doculue there c .
knosving anything at all of their contents. Not a e'ee"l:fi
g
not be anhing more at variance with the truth,
the
issorest,
of
Trinityh
c nßoard
ue
College
ink
being dare
in
attendance,w ithout hi self and 0, were the
gaged in corresponding for days with v°olftiennuhlti"iYarretr':rft 'ytt'lre
country on the business of the Board. But t jafjog totiblie
only one of the many unfounded statements re e the Pions'
Board, which had, unfortunately, tended to Ott; the o.ttheir
mind of England and Scotland on the subtleet °jai, ai'd re-
schools of Ireland. Let the system base a fairtititria, in the
Lordships might depend upon its one day re, bad
demption of the Irish people. prelate who ,
Lord STANLEY said the Ri ht the Ace ioos:
just sat down had so completely answers. eceded rhtl of
raised to this system by the Noble Lord wh° the ti not
that he should have felt it wholly unneeeasarhYl, °st, ba":assae
the Government to say a word upon the
_,,„su.efrore t- 5 far
been for one or two remarks which had fall Ile ,c'of the
Noble Earl and the Right Rev. Prelate hitre stall° out
from being insensible of the great value and ila.Pe°„rryils, of
services rendered by the Right Rev. Prelat_ie 'the ire Bight
this system of education, because he helielrees of tsbfurr Y
that system owed a great deal to the ser,°„"ai, Ds. ' reaasoo
Rev. Prelate and that distinguished istdiTc7 hakPlersteen
t
and he begged to assure them, that if t',ithe u°fii edara-,
whatever to doubt that it was the intend° tent he fsa:
to support and maintain the existing "6 But Rev.
tion in Ireland, they were mistaken' or the hint t°
sure neither the Right Reverend Gentleman n 4 not
Murrays he
had any such apprehension, audit Wareing tha't,--siote
say anything to clear the doubts of other* 'tiel,-ysteto
aiified
had the hononr in the first instance to bring, nagn,„ res
Parliament, and had ever since given Is
his
oft r
support, it would be inconsistent and
main in a Government which had the sligrehis had arisen
abandoning that system. He admitted that "
s s attributable:no
on the subject, and no doubt to that it s' to applictl,
Government had hesitated to accede influential 10
unso.rthistentioo,.con,
made to them by a large and f the System to 136
of the Irish clergy to extend the working 0 had felt it
lye
Noble Lords must remember that Gssernnleui‘e to oteod
their duty to inquire whether it was Practical) was ail flit°
system, as well as to ascertain whether the'
tion for certain alleged existing abuses in the the sista& ill
system. They did examine into the sverkillsd been 113staost
there was fr,
they did examine fully into the progress that
oreoversEnd
the national schools—they did examine,
anxiously whether it was possible to in 112the-sgratiteiot-Cist;e/j,
having come to the conclusion that the system Was a" by
day ir
with fairness, that its influence was extending eq00.14,
that the numbers educated in the schnoceow
wa_ iressos,.
creasing, and that the quality of the educe s tiheyttett,
they felt that they were justified in proposing, al.'"_s,ys
but a large and liberal increase in the amount
the
since proposed, not a continuance only of the prevnfionthe ral;;
Having come to that conclusion, they had increasettsiiors 4
and if there was any doubt as to the fixed deteruitelees Vito
the part of the Government, to maintain and etid 3i4b,
system of national education in Ireland, he e,°,0,. to ht,t
that he had lately seen a letter from the Prime Mint led
Lord Primate of Ireland, wherein it was distinctly eta g
there was no such intention on the part of the Govertt tber"
Noble Earl who spoke late in the debate had stated,.t`Tret,e,,s;
was no hope of an alteration taking place amongst tueoest'',,
tants of Ireland on this subject, because it involved 1 Aeei '";
of Protestant principle. Now, if he thought this sPcien
valved a question of principle, not only would be aba°,,nrieatef
system, but he would become one of its strongest oPsrtots
No, it was because he thought the fears of the Protbeore the
Ireland were founded in misapprehension, and in thl dete'
this apprehension would be erased with time, be It—asnport•
mined to give the system his best and most hearty
one Pe hot
The Duke of WELLINGTON confessed that %cation, the
of his life he was averse to all systems of mixed e'aide 1041
his opinion was changed while he sat on the other, supr, the
House, and ever sinec that time he had strennonslYatien
all the motions that had been made for the angMent with 50,1101
grant, and had always endeavoured to induce OW of nOt''rieii
he had any influence to countenance the ertstem,„ ,ass ca loco
education in Ireland.—( Hear, hear.) He 7.15e0 act'
into execution every measure, when once tlegal 01;10
a law, whatever might be its consequences 25,8„,escienSrias
went. Now he applied that maxim to these c'el'apprespe
come forward to the number of 1,700, to call for ;neietPterr
tion of the public tunds to the Church Educationf the Go
tb,t
national education had obtained the support thoogh,tfses
ment, the Queen, and the Legislature, and stele a' the'
r
however they might Continue to denounce the lessen
ter-hall and elsewhere, with their voices, Oleo they A sub'
speeches, and their writings, they should, like gTiobtait
home to their own parishes, carry into effect' ado
jacts, a measure which had obtained the see°°l
legal authority in the land.—( Hear, hears) sa for tbt,ousht
Lord DACRE moved that the order of the u Yt it be
reading of the game-laws be discharged, and tha
on again on Monday, the 27th inst.
Their Lordships then adjourned. sanction

B 16,sS.
ris
PARLIAMENTARY -i i,for,
TUESDAY JUNE 17. „tents
'.O r ors.
The following Bills, with 'further amell“„g
were referred to the Select Committee on Sta.- 1

Londonderry and Coleraine Railway. -
Londonderry and Enniskillen RailwaY. , jand).
.0 ,f 0
Great Southern and Western Railway (Ir'' , OP`
Via,
------ tp, ~
The Glasgow, Garnkirk, and Coatbridge ''''
read a third time and passed.

•

Standing Orders Committee,
"That, in the case of the Epping„ltSisperi.,f°7oll' reyi '
petition, the Standing Orders ought to '
That the parties be permitted to proceed WI
Oidoef °JI
Resolution agreed to.
NOTICES GIVEN AT THE PRlVAT„,,,,tesat tr,dsq/.
—Resolution
Monmouth and Hereford Railway,—e.-0,51,0,:re,
Group ( P.) adjourned till Wednesday, J.,.,0111,:pc,_b tit f 45:
North re-comm and Ribble Navigation P„oeV",„(01 Jol°
Committee onitted Bill, Friday' J:O4 L'escig'
Eastern Counties Railway (Cambridge,
mund's Extension),—Committee on NIL
2', at twelv,

01'11°

P'
!tOO
On Saturday last, a specimen of in 13%, rife
our seas, called the" Angel Fish," was caugl4,—tooli",wil,""eiii
Sands. Immediately on being taken, it void atoll-00 is,
fish. It is of the squalus, or shark genus, 317.1,'Crole° ol;
the northern seas. It is the opinion among "" 1": of
fish does not spawn, but brings forth its Young. nee (P.O ii°,ol,
we think, erroneous, arising from the circurestst osh OP
always retreating into the stomach of the Parzeljb,as3°
danger; and hence the voidance of the Young
—Cambrian.

BIRTHS. t ect,''
ton
-square,
borough
-street,
no
Ifs
it
au. ,at 9, Upper Chat
On the 13th i
0 •k-square, 08101
5,
1, the 13th inst.,at II d
MN. Speed D -par fle
Ham Longman,
WTI.°
, 1
dal 0,•
i a . 7
nessi
tnottsf.cao,aitntit.s.ishoo,aenllr.,
di oalfedyya 11:fouups he
still-born
oio 1 i , Greo illii,
CuOrrneyti,ieEsl43.t,hofinasts.o,nin. Abingdon-street, the -f A s°l3{
t oent u.csq,, °
kELisnioOrills.ctor:lonotlt.fnhho,aeesf
llla33ndttnihal,
toii
gnifnsi
a:lies,.
ro,a.ntfilliei 1 lliandgyd oonf,
.1%11. Curtrs..litol':' Cisicist:oosoo,
/hi thedla4utghhtienrs.t., the lady .. &Ulm A 011•
of v. ae-
lif• ''
n gll. Off.
On the 14th inst , at Woodberry Devi"'
the 'elf.
On the 14th hist , in Kensington-lug,t?',l dougie
Goodere, Esq., of Lincoln's Inn, barrister, °I

Rev" ____-----.---r----- ,n 0""
Esti to lk-11'
On the 1 • inst., atet./i/YLLI).• 13„jaini of the
0,1 inst., at Brighton, Jobilt daughter
daughter off olt4'
tßhiejl-171 Gould,.t
iss Eliza Mary Mason, younges John
George Mason, of Walton Bectory,
reh,
On. the 13th ' t 't tl arish cbu ',, to rc
Hinde ' • me
" a le
P
, Esq.. of the Bth or King's Begilrent,v.too, 0,
-•' (") In rnsburY, flog g
uo to , 0,
' IS
" a St.
1 n_squ are, '
Downing, Esq., of Euston-place, 1,..u5t0 rry,
Jackson, - late John po
3 oungest daughter of the ,rolot,
Montague
-street, Russell-square. ..11, J• des
On the 12th '
inst., at St. dames s,
* ' Clerken” .0 e
both All ,
~ of Wissett Lod,,.e Suffolk, to Eliza all
, , 110
laughter` of Mr. George Biggs• IA Williatn nowt
daughter of W. Robarts,
On the lAth hist ,at litusliarn, nue—' bila, Y'g
res,airgef,,Bop, Pout . tiory.ett
8a.,,, Esq., of Slung!', Bucks, to Matilda Theop
Esq., of Burnham•

Xll+%L•
On the 12th inst., in Burton-crescent, Peter 5W10,134111.
Oti the 12th► inst. at Struan Nouse, Ilaveratocl:4P
Samuel Boxill, aged 91
_On the 15th 'inst., 'William 3latthiesSerl, SCI.' late of
iierne- hill, aged 60. -Pise6
of Chester
On the 15th inst., John Willis, Rog.,
Kennington. onnabg, "
Rev. On the 15th inst., at the Rectory, Bls~►orth' --
,ev. Oliver Lodge, rector of that parish.

Of
14511Y1
3,t7 ofuewoifiity (11
e, 112, ;Strand. Printia, at Tlt
Seavo MOS.
th
Strand. in the Precinct of the h
Middlesex, Wednesday, June.18,.3345: