The Sun.
London, England, 1842-12-01 00:00:00

birtt 2htilon

THE FUNDS-(CLOSING PRICES).
BRITISH FUNDS.
Bank Stock
3 per .Cent, Red. .. 94 Ditto Bonds
3 per. Cent. Cons 94f, Ditto Old Annuities ...
31 per Cent. Red... 1004 Ditto New Annuities...
New 34 per Cent... .... loli Ex. Bills, 1,000/....2d. 48 pm
New 5 per Cen' — Ditto 500/...... 48 pm
Long Annuities to expire Ditto Small
Jan. 1860
Oct. 1859
Jan. 1660 ...... .., 12ff Consols for Opg.
FOREIGN FUNDS.
Austrian, 5 per cent. ... Portuguese, 5 per cent.
Belgian, b per cent — Ditto, New Ditto —
Brazilian Bonds... 664 Prussian, 5 per cent —
Buenos Ayres 6 per cent. Russian, 5 per cent.....,
Chinon, 6 per cent. BB Ditto, Metallic —
Colombian, 6 per cent... Spanish, 5 per cent lBl
Ditto, 1824 Ditto, Deferred.... .
Cub:Bonds, 6 per cent 794 French, 5 per cent. —f. —c.
Danish, 3 per 'ent — Exchange —f —c
Greek, 1825, 5 per cent. French, 3 percent .—f. —e.
Itleiican, 5 per cent 304 Dutch, 24 per cent. s2[-,
Ditto, 6 per cent. 1837 Ditto, 5 per cent. .. ... 101 a
Peruvian,lB2s,6 per ct.
SHARES.
Eastern Counties (23 paid) 9
Ditto New (—paid) loi
Edinburgh and Glasgow (50 paid) ••• ... 48i
Great Western, (65 paid)
London and Brighton (50 paid) 35
London and Greenwich Railway (12/ 15s ,ItliK1) 54
London and South Western (4116 s 10d pd) 60
London and Croydon Railway (Trunk)
Manchester and Leeds (70 paid)
Northern and Eastern (45 paid)
Ditto Scrip ( 5 paid) 9k
Paris and Rouen (20 paid)
South Eastern and Dover (50 paid) paid)
Ditto Scrip (20 paid)

QUEEN'S BENCII.—(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings at Nisi Prius after Term before Mr. Justice

WIGHTMAN and a Middlesex Common Jury.)
The Court was occupied the whole morning in
trying a case of ejectment, which presented no fea-
tures of any public interest.

EXCHEQUER COURT--THIS DAY.

WILLIAMS V. SALTER.

This was an action of trespass against the Board of
Guardians of the parish of Hammersmith, for re-
moving a fence erected in a place situated within the
parish, called Brooke-green, which the parish au--
thorities considered to form: part of the public high-
way, and therefore ordered it to be pulled down,
which was the cause of action. The case had been
commenced yesterday, and was resumed at the
sitting or the Court this morning.
A number of witnesses were produced on both
sides, who deposed to the shifting of paths and fences,
and-the right of highway for more than half a cen-
tury. The evidence turned exclusively upon these
points, and offered no subject of general interest.
The Jury, after a few moments' deliberation, re-
turned a verdict for the plaintiff.—Damages, 40s.

COMMON PLEAS.-(THIS DAY.)

IVQOD V. SINCLAIR.

This was an action for false imprisonment, arising
out of circumstances which at the time of the occurrence
excited much public attention. The plaintiff is an ar-
chitect, residing at Brompton, and the defendant, a
hatter, carrying on business at the West-end, but re-
siding in Alexander-square, Brompton, and lately one
of the Churchwardens of Kensington parish. It ap-
pears that permission had previously been given to
the respectable parishioners, having family graves in
Brompton new churchyard, to adorn them with shrubs
and plants, upon the payment of sums varying from
71. to 101. The plaintiff having availed himself of this
perinission at the price of 81., was indignant at find-
in,- that the defendant and the clergyman had caused
the plants to be rooted up. The petitioners, whose
feelings were hurt at this proceeding on the part of the
churchwardens, wrote to the Bishop, who in answer
said that the hurchwardens had no right to remove
the plants without having first consulted him, but that
if he had been consulted he would have ordered them
to be removed, as they ought not to have been allowed
in the first instance. Upon this the plaintiff and
others ornamented the graves anew, and again the
Plants were destroyed. An altercation took place
upon the subject in the churchyard, in the course of
which the defendant ordered a policeman to take the
plaintiff into custody, but at the station-house refused
bo make a charge against him. As some personal
collision had taken place on this occasion, the de-
fendant was indicted for an assault, but was acquitted
at the Clerkenwell Sessions in June last. The pre-
sent action was for the alleged false imprisonment in
giving the plaintiff into custody. The case occupied
the whole morning, but the evidence was, with little
&Lance on either side, to the above effect.
The Jury, after a short consultation, found for the
plain ti 'Ages 201.

ARCHES' COURT.-(THIS DAY.)
KEED V. EVERARD AND CRESSIVELL.-CMJRCH-

RATES.-JUDGMENT,

This was an appeal from the Consistory Court at
'Neorwieh, against the admission of an allegation, on
the part of the respondents against the appellant, for
the sum of 17s. for Church-rates. In July, 1842, a
Church-rate was levied in King's Lynn, and the ap-
pellant was summoned before the Magistrates, for re-
fusing to pay his quota of 17s. The case came on for
hearing, but the Magistrates refused to adjudicate, as
the original rate, or a copy thereof, could not be pro-
duced. The Churchwardens, therefore, instituted a
suit in the Consistory Court, and this was an appeal
therefrom.
Sir 11. JENNER FUST, in giving judgment this
morning, said the simple question for the Court to
determine was, whether the party had been pro-
perly cited before the Court or not. It was unfortu-.
nate that there was no principle to govern this case, as
in many others there was. It was a most important
case both to the individual and the parish citing him.
The libel stated that the churchwardens had sum-
moned Reed before the Justices of the Peace for the
non-payment of the rate; that Reed attended the
summons, but refused to pay on the ground of ille-
gality of the rate, in consequence of which the Justices
declined to proceed with the case. The answer to
that libel in the Court below, which was rejected by
the Chancellor of the diocese,' was, that the appellant
did not object to the legality of the rate, but stated
his unwillingness to pay if so decided by the Magis-
trates, and therefore the Magistrates sent an officer to
obtain the rate, or a copy, but which could not be ob-
tained, as it was in the Consistory Court. The Court
now thought that the answer ought to be admitted; as
it appeared that, before the Magistrates,Mr. Reed did
not refuse to pay the rate, on the contrary, he was
willing to abide by the decision of the "Magis-
trate, so that the averment in the libel was
untiue ; and it also appeared that one of the
Magistrates advised Mr. Reed to object to
the validity of the rate, so that it might be at once
disposed of, but this Mr. Reed refused to do, but
said he would abide by the decision of the Magis•
irate, and accordingly the rate was sent for and could
not be obtained. So far upon this specific averment
on the part of the churchwardens that he objected to
the rate, Mr. Reed had a right to contradict. The
question and the principal one before the Court was,
who was to pay the costs in the Court at Norwich, as
it was alleged that the churchwardens had proceeded
with unnecessary harshness in the matter. But the
churchwardens had a right, to proceed with the matter
in this way, geeing that they were not able to pro-
duce the original rate or a copy required of by the
Magistrates. It might certainly be a serious ground,
undoubtedly, of charging the churchwardens with mis-
conduct who, from neglect, had been unable to procure
it. lie was therefore of opinion that their allegation was
proper to be admitted, withithat part being struck out
which related. to Mr. Reed's opposition to Church-
rates in general. •

- - - -
BANKRUPTCY.—(THIS DAY.)
TIW T ILICRE COAL COMPANY-IN RE CHAPPELLOW.
The bankrupt, in conjunction with Mr. Alderman
Thomas Wood, the late unsuccessful candidate for the
Mayoralty, and several others, had been one of the
principal Directors and originators of the above Com-
pany. He had also carried on business as a bridle-
bit manufacturer in Long-acre. This day was ap-
pointed for resuming his examination, which had been
adjourned over from the last day in order that he
might afford a more specific detail of the appropria-
tion of the sum of 5,0001., which he embarked in the
early part of 1841, when commencing business in part-
nership with his son in Long-acre.
Mr. E. JAMES, who appeared on behalf of several
Creditors, said the chief object of his clients was to
come at the disposal of 5,0001., which had not been
accounted for satisfactorily in his schedule; instead of
which a long and irrelevant statement had Z-_,een put
in, which the bankrupt styled " a narrative."
After some uninteresting discussion, the fur,:-.her
examination was adjourned to the 6th of January.

IN RE HENRY WM. WEBBER.
The bankrupt in this case had been an extensive
corn and coal merchant. The amount of debts in his
schedule was 34,7001., and the available assets were
stated at about 15,000/.
The choice of assignees being fixed for this day, a
number of proofs were admitted; after which Mr.
Henry Jones, of the firm of Jones and Sons, and Wm.
assignees.
Western, were appointed

------ --=
SINGULAR REWARD FOR THE DETECTION OF A
FELONY.--A reward of 51. 10s., and an acre of land
for five years,
rent free, to any poor man, has been
offered fo:r
giving information which may lead to the
conviction of some persons who, on the 9th of No-
vember, or early on the following morning, wilfully
amid maliciously cut down an avenue of young trees, the
Property of Richard N. Cartwright, Esq., growing in
the abbey grounds of Ixworth.—SsfroTh Herald.

• -
QUEEN-SQUARE.-(THIS DAY.)
A striking instance of cruel treatment on the part
of the police was brought under the notice of Mr.
Burrell, the sitting Magistrate at the above Court,
this morning.
It appeared that Hugh Plumpion, an intelligent-
looking little fellow, about 11, who had been been
lately released from the House of Correction, where
he had been imprisoned a month for begging, had by
dint of great exertion and uniform success in horse-
holding, &c., amassed a little capital of 2s. 6d., which
he had invested in some half-bushel of walnuts, and a
wicker-basket, and he had commenced this, his first
morning in business, in Tuthill-street; a policeman
of the B division, however, came up and pulled him
off to the station-house.
Mr. BURRELL asked this functionary if he had been
aware of the circumstances above related, and his
reason for taking the boy up, while trying to obtain
an honest livelihood ; to which the policeman replied
that the boy being newly out, with the fact that he
was on the pavement while selling the nuts, were
his motives in taking him before the Magistrate.
Mr. BURRELL advised him to temper his zeal for
the future, and gave the boy great praise for his de-
termined efforts to escape from his former mode
of life.

SPIRIT of the PUBLIC JOURNALS.

FROM THE EVENING PAPERS OF THIS DAY.
GLOBE.—Not only do we claim with confidence
for the late Government the merit of having laid
down for the guidance of the naval and military com-
manders, in carrying out the objects of the expedi-
tion, the identical line which they pursued to so
successful a termination ; but we also claim, and
challenge successful contradiction either in Par-
liament or by the Tory press—for the late
Government, the merit of having prescribed,
in all their principal particulars, the very
terms which Sir Henry Pottinger has made
the bases of the treaty of peace. In our state-
ments of these claims we have endeavoured to set
them forth in the plainest and most unmistakeable
terms. We have pinned the Times and its auxiliaries
down to facts. We have sought to confine the con-
troversy within the limits to which those facts apply.
The whole question, as between the two Governments
and the parties they respectively represent, turns upon
them. The very shirking of those material facts would
be sufficient to excite suspicion of the advocates and
their cause ; but when our opponents remain deaf to
the repeated calls and challenges to -controvert those
facts, if they can, and if not, to be silent, the insolence
and dishonesty which persists in keeping up a con-
troversy on such terms, are deserving of the severest
reprehension from the public, which is sought to be
imposed on by such pertinacity. While on the sub-
ject of the treaty with China, we may mention,
that in the statement we made of the sum to be
paid by the Chinese Government to Great
Britain, we rather under-rated the amount. The
proportion which the 21,000,000 of dollars, bears to
British money, is after the rate of four dollars
to nineteen shillings British. On this estimate,
the Exchequer of this country will receive little less
than five millions sterling, instead of four millions and
a half—the amount at which we originally estimated
it. This will strengthen the position we took up with
relation to the Income-tax. It will require more than
the proverbial plausibility of Sir Robert Peel to per-
suade the country that, with five millions from China,
between five and six millions from the first year's In-
come-tax, with decreased army and navy estimates,
and an increased revenue derived from an increased
consumption of the principal exciseable articles—with
all these " appliances and means to boot," by which
the Exchequer will be replenished and relieved, Sir
Robert Peel will, we think, find it difficult to show
that the Income-tax, with its iniquities and enormi-
ties, can consistently be continued beyond the present
year.
STANDARD.—Has the increase in the population
been caused by an increase in the demand for manu-
factures ? We answer, no, except in a very small
degree, and in that small degree only in so far as the
protecting laws have communicated to the agricultu-
ral classes a share of the benefit resulting from the in-
creased demand for manufactures. For the proof.
It is not very long since the free trade
journals made it subject of boast that the
manufacturers took off the surplus population
of the agricultural districts, and the boast was
founded upon statistical evidence that the manu-
facturing class could not keep up their number
without large drafts from the agriculturists : it is
plain, then, to which class the increase
of population
(the consideration
now
in
hanod? ! to be imme •
dte lyassigned.the
But remote
influence
y their demand may
be
claimed
encourage increase among the agriculturists, and
under the protecting laws are compelled to aid the
increased population which they promote. A credit
for this influence we do not dispute; indeed it is a
part of our case ; but we must not overrate it,
and to judge of its real amount, we must look
over a wide field. Population has increased in
the United Kingdom about 50 per cent. within the
last 30 years; but has it not also increased in other
countries, as well as the Unitenearl d Kingdom ?
in es;
we find it doubled in Prussia, y doubled the
Austrian dominions, and indeed in all European
countries, except France, Spain, and Italy- ; much
more than doubled in the United States, and multi-
plied three, four, and five-fold in some of the British
Colonies. This surely cannot be,all the work of Ark-
wright and Watt, for some of the countries in which
population has made the most rapid increase are
purely agricultural, and too far removed from manu-
factures to have any such relief as the manufacturers
claim to afford to the British agricultural class. Peace,
order, improved morals, a more diffused sense of religion
—these are the causes that have augmented in such an
astonishing proportion the population of the civilised
world ; and if any one doubts that this is the
case, he has merely to glance at the nations of
Christendom, or say which population has retro-
graded, stood still, or made but a slight progress.
George the Third, Wesley and Wilberfore, Burke
and Pitt, have fully as much to do with the
increase of the population of the United King-
dom as Arkwright and Watt—gratefully as we
are bound to remember the names of the latter.
Before we withdraw attention from the increase of
population abroad, it may be well to consider what
has been the effect of this increase upon our own
manufactures. Is it not quite sufficient to account
for the increase in exports ? and, the same causes
c;intinuing to operate, does it not afford proof that,
wit.`' occasional fluctuations, our exports must continue
to inc,:ease?

MEETIN,O OF PARLTAMENT.—It is now generally
supposed thin:* the Legislature will not assemble for
the dispatch 01" business until the usual period, viz.,
the first week in February, but nothing certain can
be known on the sukiect until the next Privy Council.
DETERMINED SUICADE AT HASTINGS.--On Mon-
day afternoon a most determined suicide was com-
mitted by one of the men belono-ing to the Coast
Guard service. It appears that, wile on duty on the
beach under the East Hill, Hastings, he was observed
by some persons at a distance to place his blunderbuss
dfoduisncdharthgaetit.the
ball
had
passed
On runnin to his
assistance, g against his siitdewaans
through his heart, killing him on the spot. The un-
fortunate man has lefts wife and eight children.

-----
CRIMINAL COURT.—(THIS DAY.) I EAST COWES.—ISLE OF NIGH T.
NEW COURT. (FROM A CORRESPONDENT.)
John Collins was indicted for stealing 31. 2s. 6d. in 1 Nov.3o.—The Windsor Castle steamer, which can le
money from Thomas Foster, his master Another lad into this harbour about two years since in a damage d
named Charles Priestley, was charged with receiving state, in order to her being repaired on Mr. Ralsey' s
the money, knowing that it had been stolen. Both patent slip, discharged her cargo into Mr. Auldjo'o
prisoners bore a very respectable appearance ; they stores, then tenanted by Col. R. Hunter, Consul from
each pleaded Guilty. Their previous character not the United States at this port. In consequence of
being at all in their favour, they were sentenced to differences between the owners of the vessel and the
seven years' transportation. They were ordered to be captain, and afterwards with the agent (Mr. Edward
sent to the boys' ship to be taught a trade. Day) and since with another agent, the clerk to
J. M'lntyre was indicted for stealing a quantity of Col. Hunter (Mr. Knowles), the . cargo has remained
copper coin • he pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to in the store, with four locks on it, to the serious in-
three months'' imprisonment and hard labour. jury of the shippers and consignees, persons in DO way
EMBEZZLEMENT.—J. R. Doyle, a young man of mixed up or promoting these suits, but whose pros
respectable exterior, was indicted for embezzling va- perty was left to perish waiting their decision. After
last Mr, Aulajo's
.crcntl.r 7..
rious sums of money, to a considerable amount, the ruinous expenses had been incurred, four
property of Mr. Robert Harmer Macorel, in whose came down On Sunday last, to endeavour to get pos-
employment he was as clerk and servant. The pro- sion of the cargo. .z.:-: Tuesday
secutor did not press for a heavy judgment, and the agents, assisted by the police and some labourers,
prisoner received a good character. He was sentenced made their appearance, and served a notice on the
o six months' imprisonment and hard labour. Collector of the Customs, who attended and removed
lIODBERIES OF WlNE.—Emanuel Mallard was the Queen's lock ; at the request of the landlord, the
chargod with stealing a quantity of wine, the pro- other three locks were then broken off (Captain Ema-
perty of J. Shoulder, his master. Being strongly re- nuel's, Mr. Edward Day's, and Mr. Knowles').
commended !As mercy by the Jury, the Court sen- Mr. Auldjo being satisfied for the amount of rent
tenced him to o_vilY one month's imprisonment. in arrear (two years, 1000, the London gentlemen
Richard Sly was
indicted for stealing several bottles took possession of their goods, and are this day (Wed-
of wines, the properly of Mr. W. S. Markwell, the nesday) busily employed shipping it on board the
rietor of the North
and South American Coffee London trader Vectis, Jeffery, master,H for Cotton's
opuse, Threadneedle_ssree,‘,• where he had lived as wharf. It consists of porter in barrels and bottles,
waiter. A boy named Charnc.'
ell was the chief wit- mess beef in barrels, butter in firkins, flour in barrels,
Hess against the prisoner, and it a
pTeared that he had none of which appears to have received much damage,
himself partaken of the wine taken; and had even nor the barley in bags, and the cases of plate glass;
stood on the stairs while the prisoner went into the but the candles in boxes have perished, of the hams
cellar. Six bottles were taken at one ti fle, five of nothing remains but the bones and the skin, and the
them being put aside for a person of the n1:111° of
cheeses are also in a bad state. The cargo altogether
Blythe, a discharged waiter. has not suffered so much as might have been expected,
The Corral. left it to the Jury whether they would ' when it is considered that the salt water was one foot
convict on the evidence of a witness who had shared deep in the stores on a high tide, soon after the cargo
in the crime and kept it a secret for four months. was lanfled. The 500 sovereigns are ordered to be
The Jury acquitted the prisoner. placed in the Portsmouth branch of the Bank of Eng-
Another indictment was preferred against him for laud, by Saturday next. The demands on this cargo
stealing a number of goblets and tumblers in the exceeded 3,0001, but possession has been obtained by
month of October, the glasses being the property of payment of only 1001. There is also in the store the
the prosecutor in the last case. machinery of the steamer, and her spars and sails ; it
Mr. Markwell said, acting on information he had will requirst another trader to convey away the whole.
received, he went to the prisoner's lodgings at Char- POTATOES.—Six sloops, with west country potatoes
ing-cross, where he found the glasses. Witness said for the London market, have been detained in Cowes
he bad twenty-four waiters in his establishment, most harbour, during the past week, by the weather.
of whom lived with his predecessor, Mr. Davis. - The barometer, which was at four A.M. on Monday
A waiter of the house proved the ownership of the at 28.38, is now at 29.53. _
property.
The prisoner was found Guilty, and sentenced to
six months' hard labour.

RADICAL ARITHMETIC VERSUS•
TORY DISHONESTY.
TO THE EDITOR OF THE SUN.
Sm,—One of our Tory journals—the same that
was prosecuted to conviction a year or two ago for a
series of lying libels on the character of some of our
most respectable citizens—on Saturday last thought
proper to call in question your arithmetic, in a para-
graph which appeared in The Sun, respecting the
contributions to our local charities, and in order to
show your inaccuracy, proceeded to place the sum
contributed by the Grateful Society.to the credit of
the Tory party. Now, my pur.pose is to inform you
of a fact with which the Tory .editor was previously
very well acquainted, viz., that the Grateful Society is
avowedly non-political,, and is attended by persons of
both parties ; therefore, the sum suloarlbad by that
Society should either be left out of the account alto-
gether, or equally divided between the two parties,
which would leave the result exactly as you stated,
Having thus corrected the Tory version of your
"Radical Aiithmetic," I will take the liberty to pro-
pose a problem of another kind, which I 4144 by
happy to see solved in Felix Farley's Bristol Journal
of Saturday next:— Whether is it more immoral, un-
wittingly to commit an arithmetical error, or lipoongly
to publish a dishonest misrepresentation lam 11-1 T
formed that the President of the Grateful Society this
year was a Liberal; whether that were so or not, of
this I am certain, that I am

A LIBERAL WHO WAS INVITED TO DINE AT THE

GRATEFUL SOCIETY, BY THE PRESIDENT.
Bristol, Nov. 30.

(From the Bristol Gazette.)
The Journal of Saturday, in giving a paragraph
from The Sun, relative to the collections of the dif-
ferent Societies on Colston's Anniversary, adds the
following :
" Now for the figures.—The two Tory Societies
(the Dolphin and Grateful) contributed 8111. Bs. clear
of all expenses. The Radical Anchor Society, 3801.
3s. , from which sum is to be deducted for 80 dinners
(not to be too nice), say 501. Thus, instead of the
Whigs " beating the Tories by nearly 1004" the To-
ries licked the Whigs to the tune of about 4811. We
wonder who the wiseacre is that does the Bristol
correspondence of The Sun ?"
The statement of The Sunmight be excused on the
plea of ignorance, for we do not expect the London
journals to be accurately informed on mere local mat-
ters, but what shall be said of our Contemporary,
who being on the spot, very coolly sets down the
" Grateful" as a Tory Society, and claims the whole
amount of its collection as a party subscription ? It
is perfectly notorious that the "Grateful" is a neutral
Society, and politics are carefully and strictly es-
chewed. Whoever may be the "wiseacre" that fur-
nished the statement to The Sun, he stands in a better
position than the writer in the Journal, inasmuch as
lack or knowledge is venial compared with wilful
misrepresentation.

TEMPLETON IN PARIS.—The English primo Lenore
has been much feted by the elite of the musical pro-
fession during his late visit to the French capital. All
who have heard Mr. Templeton are unanimous in
praise of his rare qualities as a vocalist. On Saturday
week Auber, the distinguished composer of Massa-
niello, Fra J)iavolo, Gustavus the Third, Lestocq, &c.,
gave Templeton an entertainment, and invited a large
party of professors and dilettanti to meet him. During
the evening Mr. Templeton delighted all present by
singing several morceau from the various composi-
tions of his distinguished host, the maestro himself
presiding at the pianoforte.
METROPOLITAN IMPROVEMENTS.—The list of Com-
missioners appointed by her Majesty for inquiring
into and considering the most effectual means of im-
proving the metropolis, and of providing increased fa-
cilities of communication within the same, will appear
in the Gazette to-morrow evening.
The Committee of States having concluded their
labours at Berlin, and returned to their respective pro-
vinces, Miss Fanny Elssler is, at present, the undis-
puted lion of the Prussian capital. A caricature has
lately appeared there, with a view to show the com-
parative importance in which the Representative As-
sembly and the danseuse appear to have been held by
the public.

COAL M
Ships arrived since
s. d. s. d.
Adair's
Holywcll Main l7 6 Walls End Morrison ...... ~. IV 6
Nelson's %Vest Hartley l6 6 Walls End Russell's Hetton 20 6
Old Tanfield l6 6 Walls End Stewart's 2l 3
Ord's Redheugh l5 6 Walls End Sunderland lB 0
West Vs ylam l6 3 Walls End Cassop 29 6
Walls End Clennell l6 6 Walls End Hartlepool
Walls End Sosforth
Walls End Heaton l9 0 Walls Ei d Evenwood
Walls End Hilda l7 6 Walls End Richardson'sTeesl7 9
Walls End Norihumberland 17 0 Walls End Seymour Tees... 19 6
Walls End Riddell's lB 9 Cowpen l6 6
Walls End Wharncliffe l9 0 Howard's West Netherton 16 6
Walls End Haswell 2O 1 Hartley l6 6
Walls End Hetton 2O 9

AR KET.
last market.day, 2.

TUESDAY NIGHT'S GAZETTE.
DIVIDENDS.
At the Court of Bankruptcy Basinghall-street.

J. Hopkins, butcher, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire,
Dec. 22, at half-past eleven—R. March, hatter, Cheap-
side, Dec. 22, at half-past eleven—J. Cockburn, mer-
chant, hw ae nlyt
e,
—lsT
je w.
Brookß Broad-street, -
andstre eTt
Worcestershire, rerreasytleorrs,hairned, Dwe.c.ls,
Shand,
Lo.i3ronodioc,n ,
dDraepce r2so, ,
sat
ot
uhrabl f-p a
ridge,st
pas o—
t merchants,tw
a
jun
tjha,lf-
chester-street, London, Dee. 22, at half-past one—J. W.
GreatG . B
Win-
chester-street, igns
Thomas, corn-merchant, New Corn-exchange, Mark-
lane, Dec. 22, at twelve—S. Jackson and T. F. Jtokson,
woolstaplers, Bermondsey-street, Surrey, Dec. 22, at
eleven—F. Preston, ship-builder, Southtown, Suffolk,
Dec. 22, at half-past twelve—B. Sibarr ons aneJ. Brook,
ironfounders, Folly, Dockhead, Bermondsey, Dec. 22, at
half-past eleven—J. Hutton, merchant, Fenchurch-street,
Dec. 20, at half-past one—J. Simmons, corn-dealer,
Longwick, Buckinghamshire, Dec. 20, at one—H. T.
Harrison, hotel-keeper, Tavistock-row, Covent-garden,
Dec. 20, at half-past twelve—H. Brand, coal-merchant,
Cambridge, Dee. 20, at twelve—W. Brocksopp, grocer,
High-street, Southwark, Dec. 20, at half-past twelve—
J. Richmond, merchant, Lime-street, London, Dec. 20,
at eleven—E. T. Gough, patent agent, Strand, Dec. 21,
at eleven—G. A. Kollmann, pianoforte-maker, St. Mar-
tin's-lane, Dec. 20, at one—J. Kingsford and F. E.
Kingsford, wine-merchants, Dever, Dec. 20, at twelve.

In the Country.
D. Buglass, victualler, Sunderland, Dec. 20, at eleven,
at the District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-
Tyne.
CERTIFICATES to be granted, unless cause be shown
to the contrary, on the day herein mentioned.
J. Sharp and R. Pearson, machine makers, Bradford,
Yorkshire, Dec. 20—R. Lamb, iron merchant, Stockton,
Durham, Dec. 20—J. and D. Arthur, iron masters,
‘Neath, Glamorganshire, Dec. 20-11. Morris, timber
merchant, Chepstow, Monmouthshire, Dec. 20 E.
Minty, maltster, Warminster, Wiltshire, Dec. 20—T.
Worinton, hosier, Burbage, Leicestershire, Dec. 20—W.
Stewart, muslin manufacturer, Ludgate-hill, Dec. 22
W. Kearse, tailor, Belgrave-place, Walworth-road, Dec.
20—J. E. Beerbohm and W. E. Slaughter, merchants,
Fenchurch•street, Dec. 22—T. Scott, commission agent,
Bow Church-yard, Dec. 23—W. Ansel!, shopkeeper,
Pontypool, Monmouthshire, Dec. 22—C. King, J. San-
dell, and D. H. King, paper stainers, Berners-street, Ox-
ford-street,Dec. 24—J. Atkins, sen., and J. Atkins, jun.,
lime merchants, Coulsdon, Surrey, Dec. 23—W. Mills,
innholder, Caterham, Surrey, Dec. 23—R. B. Culyer,
currier, Clifton-street, Finsbury, Dec. 22—T. Wooster,
jun., merchant, Liverpool-street, City, Dec. 22—F. J.
Osbaldeston, horse dealer, St. Alban's, Dec. 22-4. Rey-
nolds, sen., and J. Reynolds, jun., drysalters,•Dowgate-
dock, Upper Thames-street, Dec. 20—J. Ivery, car-
penter, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, Dec. 20-3.
Flood, surgeon, Dean-street, Westminster, Dec. 21-li.

H. Smyth, merchant, Cornhill, Dec. 23—J. J. Smith,
bookbinder, Gate-street, Lincoln's Inn-fields, Dec. 23
J. Simpson, licensed victualler, Camberwell, Dec. 20—T.
Humfrey, jun., bricklayer, Great Stanmore, Middlesex,
Dec. 22—W. and B. Cribb lucifer match manufacturers,
Regent's-canal-basin, Dec. 22—F. J. Mitchell, builder,
Aldersgate-street, Dec. 22—G. F. Sizer, linen draper,
Worcester, Dec. 20—G. Greenwell, J. B. D. Dearberg,
and W. Whitehall, silk manufacturers, Fore-street, City,
Dec. 21—J. Bryant; bookseller, King William-street,
West Strand, Dec. 20—J. and J. J. Shury, engravers,
Charterhouse-street, Dec. 21—C. Newman, ironfounder,
Scrips, Essex, Dec. 22—J. Reeve, carver, High Holborn,
Dec. 22—J. Dover, merchant, Three Cranes Wharf, City,
Dec. 23—J. Mills, canal carrier, London-wall, Dec. 23-
8, Smith, timber merchant, Pump-row, Old-street-road,
Dec. 23—W. N. Hunt, stationer, Watling-street, Dec. 23
—T. Maguire, publican, Livernool, Dec. 21—H. Brand,
slater, Cambridke, Dee. 20-1). Antrobus, salt merchant,
tireat Budwortb, Cheshire, Dec. 22—T. G. Martin,
A.
GreatA Winchester-,ath ean
ds.losotrree,etd eoailedrs,Tlroad -swtrineeet,mDeerce.h2a3n—t,
Liver-
pool, Dec. 21— G. P. Kennan and A. Samson, calico
printers, Manchester, Dec. 22—J. Brookbanks, draper,
Dudley, Worcestershire, Dec. 23—J. Hayward, book-
seller, Manchester, Dec. 22—R. Wharton, innkeeper,
Oldham, Lancashire, Dec. 21—H. Hepworth, cloth manu-
facturer, Leeds, Dec. 22—J. Ross, woolstapler, Halifax,
Yorkshire,i Dec. 22—W. Reynolds, cotton spinner,
Breightmet, Lancashire, Dec. 21—F. Arthur, coach-
maker, Birmingham, Dec. 26—J. Pidcote and T. Barton,
corn factors, Nottingham, Dec. 22.