The Sun.
London, England, 1820-05-31 00:00:00

)rlfl

r*

'eicii
t,ina

re-
y

hrf•

rl4°

.aS

!ode
{'ems
:rat
,

tog

les"
age
pf'

3tid'
tett.

t
ket
317.•
osa

ra• .

;
s

or

dill
than the Bin of 1815. The object of that
1.5i1l had beets less to secure a fair price to the far-
mer, than to render the country independent of
,r,41g0 States by encouraging the growth of corn.
hi": Ilen. Member their entered into extensive
ti,' t"e al details, with, the view of sbewiug that
Bill of 1815 gave less protection to farmers,
than ,hy of the former Acts on the same subject.
ILContended. that the country now felt the effects
°l,lie inundation of foreign corn which had taken
rb'ee in 1817 The state of agriculture was such,
at the stock most diminish every day. Capital
was wasted, and could not he restored, and with
't he feared was gone, the foundation of the wealth
:lid prosperity of the country. Agricultural dis-
i.tss took the lead, and was the cause of all other
lostresses. Whenever agriculture had been de-
lo
,r
manufactures had suffered, and the
;%rlval of the one had always followed that
:'': the other. This had been particularly
'"ced by the rise and fall of our woollen matter-
,det'res• The listress of the people never pro-
t-e:.eed from ll
the high price of torte ; On the co..
t."Y, as the belts of corn decreased their distress
InflPa'ert. F. tie cheapness of corn was tela-
tie ; and it was possible that cheap corn should
1,- dear, and d,ar Coro cheap, 10
menufact urers
.....
ill' misery arising from a went of labour was in-
i'''''‘Y greater than any that could he experienced
4.°'l), a partiil advance on the price of corn. The
treat body o; peoiele were the purchasers of corn,
„." he therefore contended that the price could
trot Il •
se very high unless their means increased so
41 '0 enable them to buy at a high price. It was
N"e"leted that there were about five millioos Of
uns in his country who were occupied as la-
.i.tii,
Li ''rers. If the wages pod to these were dimi-
,t4e•l hy four shillings a week, the total snot
,'ulr-ryyt, tr,on them would, in the course of a
"at
kr, , amount to no less than 52,000,0001. per
ti ""). This affecting the general clictiatt.oonot
1'
ti country, would again operate to the pri:tiee
t our trade, and diminish the value of all the
vi."oet. of industry, and thus occasion much more
-vr('gs than could he felt front an advance on the
psi'
laTia)'• I3A.RING et ished to :der a few observations
:Pe preset ,Ito .00, tom doing this he should
;.1('ell•litr to tiiscuss the question• with all that
44r1--s 5 ~t lerneer wo,ich the Hon Member for
Lhti.'ty (Mr. 1-1. Sooner) brought into every de-
ail,' the Gerolemen opposed to the agi.atiou
% lI'S question bad a right to take credit to theme
eh
g spoor iu
i 1 es ~,l• not having done any thing to dietnn
iti":•tettle(EW.l Wade in 1815. Though he opposed
Itlsl Measure at the time, and bad ever since con-
ittiged to t,isapprove of it, se convinced was he of
jate Impropriety of dm ttd
istbing the public mi, or
1,81,445 t ily di palling from a gr eat system when once
sri 'Ned) 'het tie had had no intention of baying
11,,,,,
Yth the Corn Laws. From the part
116 taken by those to whom he was opposed on
11,:ttllestion, ir turned out as he had predicted,
kr rl'e Act oe 1815 did not afford the corn
t ,;' Sts that pw n rectio which they had expect.
olt:o. derive troth it, and in feet only proved
tirr impossibility of bolstering up the prices of
I„l.P''s 4 necessary consumption by means of
lle"46'iott. So strongly did lie feel this, that if
ti,tit"hefit it possible that a Committee could
k,;" come to resolutions of that stilt, he did not
ii„ 11* het I e for one should be dispose'd to go
10 'lle C ,Illmittee now moved for, Tue lion,
4ii..ti 11/1""' for E•,ex, with that manly eando,ir
tkb." Itehtiged to his character, had stated his
te,'!'" lee he a higher protecting price, but with-
er&t,l'qing to whet extent he wished ogo in this
kliCrret• He imputed all the existing rfistress to
toloA'w place of eon); but what he (Mr; Baring)
thel `` wish to know, would be the situation of
Ilse'''''er classes, if the plan of the Hon. Mew-
lei "r Essex were carried into effect, and the*thee'e of bread advanced 30, 40, or 50 per cent. ?
Itti,‘"'ent to which the lion. Member .(Mr. Wes-
te4-i; Wool(' proceed, he did not know. We al-
-4%,k Paid for bread doeble the price paid by the
lii, oif 'he world, but that would not•satisfy hint.
11e..1 he then have the people of gieland pay
ti,:e. litnes the price i hat was paid by the inha-
Noe„?t, 01 (slier coontrics I But how, in that case,
to 'I it he pessohle for our manufacturing classes
lio,.4`'Y on their labour ? Hot some might
btv 'I. Let its have 'a high price for corn, and
4liihtl: ihino the toanefactnring classes, let them
Tit,"
li' themselves as they can." It was, ver. certain that that which enabled this
t
-i,,' , ' t
,)Nry a high price for its bread, was the
‘'sett"albee of our having these manufacturing
11"r,48) 'Moog us ; and setting aside the consi-
liille t ° that having these interests, it was imps-
lltte,l/4 () shake them off—without them the present
4kni,,',e"uld not be kept op in a country merely
s 'lttiral. It was hence clear, that all attempts
41 belt 1
to tilt toe two classes most prove useless ;
ttedq "ests were ()mind up together, and one
tli' Ilfn 11 'the other was severely
ttre,sd otitis') when
qe,,s ,v He then, from a comparison of the
oral ' ewn, shewed that no alteration in the
//155seds3::3, was necessary from the present de-
!ln)
14, lord 0! of the agricultural interest. It was
corn had been brought
e 'II_ l'it 1)0 foreign e(
Tel 01: conntry for the last eighteen months,
1)00 sitiur.elore it the protecting price had been
pe -„,,l"gs, the corn grower would only have
:5i4:11,014-1e lie
,at present was. The pa ice of
''r' G,_ ( not be forced tip in the manner that
ht
."efrten connected with the landed in-
e - seer, ,
reeee o roseu to be practicable by the inter-
:‘e 'int Parliament—it must depend tot the re-
1011.ereedr`'Iliistarices of the country. The farmer
4(1 tet
efr°lll the distress of the manufacturer,
0 tare nisnufact were suffered from the distress of
''S3( ilier• But rite Fp ble Member for
thst x ne,de . ononsa
hitt be.hip.
„ " appear that it was all on one side,
14'11)1,e1,:e the termer could not consuene the
t,,(111 se, .rel‘ sufl,r.•d ; but he (Mr. Baring)
011 - 411)tai, that because the manufacturer
t,i trot
co.
11,1 I provo, osure the. farmer suffereo. It had
%4tootose that in one manufdcturing district,
4,11 re i" r of beasts slaughtered in one year had
I'IPIt llit"Heed Ir°!1) 58,000 to This proved
o
tier t People 46,000.
there (as in-lueland) were too
r,ith,c:(l!sichase the higher classes of agricultural
ti4opiiito 'oe presenteprotecting price, he was
:. ks ii. 11, Otitthi trot " I ' 1 I:"
tit Id seen tee,to )e augnieutet . ery
-4'ti, 'llori t,► I's Profits qiatieshed, and the pre-
e4 lett, , ° the part of fie la-tiffed proprietors
k etle()_()""o but an effort to exempt themselves
41111Qp lot of every other class in so-

clety. They would rind themselves mistaken. If
Parliament were to give them a hundred shillings
as a protecting price, the landlords would not be
able to keep up their rents as they were during the
war. The only effect of an effort to accomplish
this would be to bring down the rents lower titan
they would otherwise fall. Much stress had been
laid, and in diacussioos like the present always
had been laid, on the great burdens imposed by
taxation on the landed interest. It would
be found, by referring to the evidence given
before the Committee on the Corn Laws, that
the burdens imposed by Government on agri-
culture were of little moment. With the ex-
ception of the tax on agricultural' horses
(which was very small), the burdens which they
had to sustain 'were trifling. But when it was
asserted that they could nor enter into competi-
tion with come ries which wet e not so oppressed
by taxation, their forgot that in every other coun-
try in Europe the land. itself was heavily taxed.
This must be the case in poor and in agricultural
commies, where the whole of the revenue must
be derived Irons land. The Petitions which co-
vered the table he did not think entitled to much
attention. They resembled those which had been
mesented some years ago on the subject of Uni-
versal Suffrage, anti they had been got up its the
same way. He thought the agricultural classes
suffered less than others. He did tot mean to
say that they did not suffer considerably, but he
conscientiously believed that they had less cause
for complaint than most of the other classes of
the comnotnity. For the evils of which they com-
plained they must seek a remedy which could not
be afforded to them by legislation and new hews--
they must serk it in a reduction of their rents.
The depression he did not think was so great as
had beets generally supposed. At least he should
be led to tali C.I/Clusiall front -his own small
exp.-tie:tee ill that way. He had recently let
consaletable farms for the s-tme rents. as for-
merly, without even a claim bsiag made on
the part ef the tanners for a diminution of
tent. The table, it was true, was now loaded
‘vith from the Agricultural Interest, bet
weal, set,..e were removed, it would inonstitately be
tovetrd with Petitions of an opposite coaracter, it
there were any probability of the prayer of those
now hetore them being attends d to. For these,
however, 4ie trusted there would he no occasion,
as ire doubted not the manner in which the pre-
sent Petitions were received would satisfy the
Canetry that there existed no serious intention of
altering the Corn Laws. With respect to the ave.
rages, it in telling them there had been any
abuse, that abuse ought certainly to be dotte
away. The- parties complaining of this had the
remedy in their own hands, and a remonstrance to
the Magistrates would ptoteably do away with the
necessity of calling for the interference of Parlia-
ment. He concluded by repeating his declaration
that lie had no intention of mooting any question
connected with the Corn Laws, and exptess!ng
the importance he attached to steady persever-
ance its si•:y system once adopted.
Mr. F. LEvvIS said, the holsters under the pre-
sent system were so agitated by rumours of the
opening and shutting of ports., and by ointments
that the averages (which all knew it was no easy
task to take properly) were improperly Laken, that
he slid net think thereould be tranquillized with-
out some interference on the part of Parliament,
and teeretore he, for one, was desirous of going
into some inquiry On the subject. That the opi-
nions of the farmers were erroneous he did not
think it would be difficult to make clearly appear.
He proceeded to remark, that most of the Peti-
tions now before them, came from the occupiers,
and not from the smile's of land ; and then
shoved that those classes had distinct interests,
and that the benefit now claimed by the occupiers
would inet:itably be taken from them by the
owners when the present leases expired. The
protection now afforded by the importation price
being fixed at 80s. he regarded as very inconvenient.
He was inclined 1.41 think that a duty of even less
titan twenty shillings might answer much bet-
ter. Some inquiry would, in his opinion, be de-
sirable, as the country was now in a situation
wholly different from- that. in which it- stood iu
1815 The expense of cultivatint:,,,, land (includ-
ing tent) had diminished since that period by not
less fists one-third, and therefore the protection
which it was right to affood then might not he
necessary now, and lie could tint -but persuade
himself. ohm the time was not tar distant when it
would he necessary for them, some degree, to
retread their steps, and when it would be thought
wise to take this question into consideration with
a view of gradually undoing what had been done.
It was the general view of the country that the
present protection operated as a tax. on a con-
sumable article. 'Else difference between what
was paid for bread, and what would be paid for
it if no Corn Bill had passed, operated as a 'tax
on the people, but its produce went not to the
Government—not to the tenants—but to the land-
lords of England. This must therefore. be re.:
garde[) as a tax of the worst description imposed
to enrich .a particular class of individuals. The
share of it which he as a landed proprietor re-
ceived he would willingly give up, and by so do,
ing he was satisfied that he should be a gainer,
from the change which would then take place iu
the whole face of society. He thought inquiry
desirable and necessary, but at the same time did
not feel himself hound to vote in favour of the
particular inquiry called for by the present motion,
Lord MILTON was in hopes that the inquiry
proposed would have suggested such remedial
measures that he could hate voted for it; but he
HOW found the proposition of the Hon. -Gentle-
man was so confined, and so little adapted to the
circumstances of the country, that he could not
give it his support. With the views of the Right.
Hon. Gentleman .opposite—with every thing that
he had expressed on the subject respecting the
averages and the mice of corn,- he thought it im-
possible not to concur, and he had therefore been
a little surprised at the end cif his speech to learn-
i-tbat that Right Hon. Gentleman might, by pos-
sibility, support the motion.—(" No, no," from
,he Ministerial side.)—He had nttderstood that
the Right Flout. Gentleman was disposed to con-
sent to the inquiry, if limited in a particular way.
—This•limitation was precisely that to which be
(Lord Milton) could not agree. The Noble'Lord
opposed the motion On the ground that it woulj

only excite. excite. the expectation of every tardier in
England, and dash the cup front his lips. The
real history of the distress in the country arose
out of the unnatural state of thinks for the last
twenty-five years. It bad been the peculiar
distinction of the late War, that we had not
only expended an immense capital which had pro.
doced no beneficial effect, because the weight or
taxation bad pressed heavily on all classes of the
community. If the resources of the country were
not increased, the country would not long be able
to bear the load of eaxation The Noble Lord
was not sanguine enough to believe the load of
debt could b removed to any great extent, end
it would be a delusion to impress on the people
that the distresses could be alleviated suddenly.
The House ought to turn their minds to inquiry
upon a large and mere extended view than that
proposed by •the Hon. Member tor Surrey. It
would appear that Parliament was blind to the
interests of the country, if they limited inquiry to
the form proposed. He felt regret. in not being
able to vote for a motion on the subject, because
he believed that. inquiry upon a large scale might
have been attended with a good result. No good
could possibly arise from limited and petty in-
quiry.

Mr. CURWEN said, the speech of the Right
Hon.. Gentleman on the opposite side of the
House made a deep impression on him. 'rite Corn
Laws were most essential at the time they were
adopted, bitt when.the Right H-on. Member at the
head of the Board-of Trade stated that there was
nor- rorn to support the country, it was in his
opinion one of the most serious assertions ever
made in that House. He found a difficulty in
giving his vote for any inquiry that would
lead to increase the price of grain and de-
crease the corn of the country. The great dif-
ficulty under which the country lahnered arose
from the unproductive state of labour. The
diminution Of income, occasioned by fail-
log 011 in the price of labour, amounted to six
millions annually. Great difficulty had fallen on
•he landed interest, _which tequired the attention
of the House. The enormous extent of Poor-
rates, and tire increase of Taxes, occasioned a hea-
vier pressure than at any period dining the tear. •
Mr. Crater considered the landed interest as suf.
tenni.: more severely that► the funded interest. He
would' have gone into a Committee with two ob-
jects : First, to relieve the Poor-rates and equalize
the Taxes with regard to funded property, The
policy of this Country had been mistaken. It
went to lay Tax-es on labour,. and when labour
exceeded the demand, the tax fell on the land-
holder. Two millions were paid in Texes out of
I ribolll%, Could any thing h,:.‘ inort- :o)stird [ball to
tax those who in consequence of such tax were
driven to the p,o-i)ii ? _ He was an advocate for a'
modified Income Tax. The Taxes ought to fall
equi,lly on every part of the community. A'Com-
mittee might he appointed to inquire into the
distresses of the Country. but it should be upon a
broad efficient system. Inquiry -ought to be for
the benefit of the working classes. If the Taxes
on Leather and Salt Were removed, it would ease
the farmers of four millions, and enable them to
fall grain eight shillings in the quarter. He wished
the maximum to be eighty shillings : he could not
votelor eke motion.

• •
Mr. IVCARDO said, he did not rise to support
the interestr of the land Dr stockholder, but the
interest of the cmintty at large. •In taking a fair
view of the subject, he was bound to object.to
the Corn Laws. It they were to oven the ports
the price of grain would be the same in England
as in other countries, and that would be a remu-
nerating price —(A cry of " rfo, no.")—The
Hon. Member drew the attention or the House
t-o the case of a manufacturer of cloth, who was
obliged to divide the produce of his labour into
two portions. One portion was given to his la-
booms, who assisted him to manufacture the ar-
ticle ~the other portion was to pay hint for mak-
ing it. Corn rose in price, and the men who
worked for cloth would starve, if the man',tac-
turer (lid not give them twenty instead of fifteen
per cent. He asked in that case whether the
tising of Corn would not raise the price of Stock ?
The Aericithurists might as well say, they ought
to grow all the sugar used in Great Britain as the
corn. They might as well claim a right to the
exclusive cultivation of beet-rout. Such an at.
tempt would not be more absurd than that of at-
tempting to grow all the corn consumed
country. The interest of the public was to be
considered before that of any particular class.
The crrOS--of 1815 was making the Corn Ltw
permanent ; it snouhl have been temporary; This.
country wou!,t he the happiest in the world if it
got rid of the National Debt and the Corn Laws.
—(A
laugh.)There was riot the slightest ground
for going into the proposed inquiry. It was in
tended to do good, but might -do a great deal of
mischief.

BgNETT said, the Holt; Gentleman's
statement that England would be the happiest coun-
try in the world it k got rid of the. Nationa! Debt
and the Coin Laws, implied, that they could not
get. rid of the Corn Laws without the National
Debt. He thought that the fact was, if there
was no National Debt, they would want no Corn
Laws. The Corn Laws had not been attended
with the expected effect, and he, for one, was
disposed to abandon them. He supported the
motion. •

Mr. HusussoN said, this question had been so
•forcibly considered by his Right Hon. Friend at
the bead of the Board of Trade, that he should not
have risen to address the House, had not the Noble
Lord (Member for Yorkshire) mistaken the argu-
ment of his Right Hon. Friend. In 1815, when
the subject was under discussion, he was one
who took part in the debate upon the Bill.—He
proceeded to state the reasons which induced hint
to support the Corn Bill, and !contended in a very
able argument that the measure had been attend-
ed with beneficial effects.

Mr. Cox s (of Norfolk) said, he could have wish-
ed to ,see this Committee formed on a brOad basis,
which would connect the agricultural with the
commercial interests. There were various causes
for the distresses of the agricultural interests; but
he believed that taxes were the principal. The
tythes constituted another cause.

Mr. ELLIci3 s;rongty opposed the motion,
whicli had 101 its object the raising she prices of

thd necessaries of life, and therefore be moved
!he previous question.
Mr. MANFIELD declared that the distresses of
the agricultural interests could not Pcpi:d those
of the manufacturing interests : and he saw no
reason for any proposition that would have the
effeet Of raising the price of corn.
Mr. BROUGHAM said lie could not, consistent
with his duty to the Public and the Agriculturists,
avoid offering a few observations on the motion.
He deprecated the intention to move the previous
question upon a sublet:, of so mtich impottance.
' Rather than censeet to tell the Petitioners the
subject had bete) received with indifference, he
should vote for the motion, although be considered
the terms of it too narrow to answer the intended
purpose. . The. Honourable Member at consider-
able length, supported the Agricultural Interest;
He thought the lettuce:news which would be
necessary for a man to remove tec hulk of his
capiral into foreign countries, noon be strop,
enough to induce him also to transport hittiserf
with that capital. He did not, Iherefote, gist. way
to any of those fears which were emertaincd by
many respectable Geotlemert on this bead. Un-
l'es they were prepared to Show that the causes
oberatieg on :,mall capitals to go abroad were
sufficient to produce emigration, he shoeld not-
think-there was any occasion for alarm.
Mr. Glees held in his band an ametidmento
which was -to the effect that a Select Committee
be appointed for the.perpose of ascer; ainioe, the
'mode best titted for ascerieiniog the avera price'
of corn. He s'oeold think it his duty to pot this,
unless the Hon. Member ( %ie. Ellice) withdrew
his motion for the previous (petition
Mr. Eeetce briefly explained, and expressed
his readiness ro withdraw his motion.
General GAsCOIGNC said, that there was scarcely
One Member present who was. nor aeare before
lie entered the House Writ ereni,g, that be
in-
tended to move the previous question. So strongly
was he opposed to the appoit men: of a Com-
mittee for the purposes intended by the Honour-
able Mover, that if such Committee should be
appointed, and any measure be carried upon its
recommendation, he should feel himself bound to
make au attempt to repeal that meestire,or at least
to bring the subject again no ,er the consideration
of the House. After this expiii,mion. the House
would not be surprised .at his objecting to the
motion for the previous question being with.
drawn.
Mr. CORBETT spoke in favour of the original
motion.
Lord Cies-reel:neon said, in Vol) ie for the pre-
eiou. quest ion, de begged to be t....irleis!ood as
doing so with a view to get rid- of the motion of
the ion. Member for Surrey. If after that were
disposed of, a Committee Should be proposed toe
the purpose of inquiry, to eseeitain whether tue
provii.ions of the ACt of 1815 had been defeated
by I tie 'mimic'. or in king :tie average, be should
out object to it. -
Mr. Alderman HEYGATE thought the Core Laws
required revision, ,agriculture having been much.
tflfected by the Bullion Question, but would op-
pose any rise in the average price of in:Toiling
Corn, or any tax on capital in trade, whir_was
equally depresses with agriculture.
Sir THOMAS A.CLAtD spoke at some length in
favoUr of going into a Committee to inquire into
the distresses complained of in toe petitions on
the table.,. •
After a few words from Mr. V. FITZGERALD
and Mr. Wooanouse,
Mr. fitiLma SUMNER replied. -
Several Members rose to speak, but gave way
to the general impatience of the House, and the
Gallery was cleared for a division.—The numbers
were—

For the previous Question being put lOl
Against it
ISO
Majority in favour of the Original Motion —49.
On our re-admission lot') the gaGry we found
Lord MILToN on 'Hs legs, lamenting the decision
to which the House had come, and
,begging tnemt.
to deter the no►ninalion of the Committee on ac-
count of the early hour (half-past 3).
Mr. BARING expressed Ids apprehension that
the decision of the House that night would rend
to show the people the perilous state they were
in, and proottee the greatest dissatisfaction. The
'House having come to this unexpected, and, in-
his mind, Ittineotible decision, he thought a fitter
than that should be appointed for choosing
' the Menthe's of the CoMmittee upon which so
much would depend. lie therefore proposed that
the limber consideration gat the subject should be
adjourned till this day (Wednesda:). •
" Who seconds the motion ?" asked the
,SPEAKER.
Sir R. WlLsotst approached the table and ex-
claimed, '' I second it." Fie felt anxious for the
traoquillity of the country, and he kuear the
sittiatiOn in which it would be placed. If the
result of the discussion could have been anti-
cipated millions of the people, would have stood
forward with petitions against the measure. Tire
measure was such as could not be carried on
in a free country; it could be tolerated only
under a military Government. The Gentlemen
who supported. it would require to put garrisons
in every town in.. order to keep the people at
peace, for discontent
, would spread throngh.every
class of the country, and to this measure.it would
mainly owe its source.
..4.Lord CASTLEREAGH said, that the question
which the interests of the country required would
demand attentive deliberation, and be implored
the House to pause, and not. to proceed in naming
the Committee.. He had anticipated a different
result, and when several Members, who were in-
clined to vote against the measure, had asked his
opinion respecting the result of the discussion,
be had said that he entertained but little difficulty
concerning the conclusion, and they departed.
.He besought the House to postpone the appoint-
ment of the Committee until'the evening. ,
Mr. BaouGuasi asked, what had been said by
any Members during the • debase 'which could
give cause for the charge of the Honourable
Member. for Taunton, that the bread of she
poor was to be raised in price ? Why had that
Honourable Member, as well as the Gallant
Officer, the Mein be; for Southwark, to differ with
whom he always regretted, made such declara-
tions ? On What ground ? Wall every man in
England, Scotland', and Ireland to charge upon
than Ccintnittee the increase of the price of his

THEATRICAL. REGISTER.
Pe,formed Lest Nigh t.
THF:A rRE RovAr., Dttuity-LANE.—(Secutt Tinie), Virginius :
Vir;initts, dlr. Kea?, ; A.ppius, 111 r. itar ; Phtutia, Nlrs.
Glover; Virginia, Mrs. West. After which (First Tune),
Giovanni in London.
TLIEATI? }tOY.tt., CnVENT-GARDEN.-1-leuri Qnatre :
Mr. M,cready; O'Dorincl, Mr. lobo Johnstone ; Florence
Saitit Leon, Mis ; Clotilde de Bir,ni, Miss I:ruii-
ton ; Louimn, Miss M.Tree. Alter which,
...Vile. Buttle of
Botttrell lirigg.

PRICE 0
THIS HAY AT
Bank Stock
3 per Urfa. Ited.
5 per Cent. C0n5.....
Si per Cent. 76i77
4 per Cents

STOCKS
ONE CLOCK.

5 per Ct. Navy Ann... 110,1.7.:ii
Bank Lunn: Ann. 174 13-1611 is
India lionds .... 2Us. 16s. pr.
Excl1.11;11,, 12s. pr. ;mr.
Cons. for Account ....

ALthivErt-1 1 Witt,rfrortl, 1 Let ward Islmp!.
Due—l Gutteoburgit, i ilaniburgb,

HIGH WATER Al' I,()Niii-):+4 ISIIIDGE TO,MORRow.
Alorving, lfi ininutt3 after s.—Evening, 40 minutes aqvc 5.

THE SUN.

soLEm cues nicEice FA LSUM A tu),;11

LONDON,
WEDNESDAY, M3Y 31, 1820.