The Sun.
London, England, 1829-06-22 00:00:00

LIVERPOOL.

SATURDAY, JUNE 20.—High water 14 minutes past
one o'clock.—Wind S.E.—Arrived the William Byrnes,
Hackstaff, from New York; Elizabeth, Callander, from
Charleston ; Charles Stokes, from Seville ;
from Fowey.
CLEARED OUTWARDS.--The Boston, Mackey, for
Boston ; John Wells, Curtis, for Philadelphia ; Gipsy,
—, for Bombay ; Lee, Cannon, for Montreal ; Star,
Duff, for Cadiz ; Splendid, —, for New York ; Con-
stance, Natriz, for Pernam.

Off Holyhead the a Delaware, Arne' jean ship, from
•
Virginia.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'SCOURT, hint 20.

Mr. KNIGHT applied to the Court to dissolve an

injunction granted by his Honour, to restrain the
defendants from printing, publishing, or selling a
certain pattern of printed linen and cotton goods
designed by the plaintiffs, on the ground that the
injunction was general, whereas it ought to be con-
fined to the period of three months from the time
of the publication of the original pattern. There
was another point which the parties whom he re-
presented thought important, which was, whe.•
then this was a case in which a Court of Equity
ought to interfere, the Act having pointed out the
remedy—namely, by an action at law for damages;
that point he should reserve for the opinion of the
Lord Chancellor ; the only question before his
Honour was, whether the injunction, if rightly
granted at all, ought not to be confined to the re-
straining of the printing, publishing, and selling,
for the period of three months only.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL appeared for the plain-
tiffs, and observed that the injunction was only
until the further order of the Court, and was granted
on the 24th of April last, and no application was
made to dissolve it till now, when the three months
have expired. The injunction was granted in all
respects regularly, and what is to be done now is a
totally different question. The time having elapsed,
the defendants have a right now to print, and to sell
that which they print, and the injunction will now
be dissolved on certain terms; but he denied the
right of the defendants to sell what they printed
within the three months; and what he should ask
was, that the defendants should make an affidavit
of that which they printed, and which the injunc-
tion stopped the sale of, so as to prevent such goods
finding their way into the market.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL stated the mode in
which these piracies were managed to be, that after
the inventor has been at an enormous expense in
designing pattew, some of which do not succeed,
and which theleabns who are in the habit of pirat-
ing do not thiiik 'north their while to copy, as
a good pattern comes out, that instant they begin to
pirate. The trade know well that the piracy is
going on, and that there is a great stock in hand :
immediately the three months are expired, they
pour into the market the pattern they have thus
pirated, and the persons who want to purchase,
knowing there will be a glut, and that therefore the
article will be cheap at the end of the three months,
wait till that time before they buy the stock of the
inventor, so that he is not enabled to sell during the
three months, because it is known it will be cheaper
hereafter, and at the end of the three months he
finds himself in competition with his own invention
with a large stock in hand, which has been pirated
during the time the act gave him the protection.
The VICE-CHANCELLOR—The injunction ought

to be dissolved, except so far as it tends to restrain
the defendant from selling hereafter those patterns
which he may have printed during the continuance
of the three months ; and if there is reason to
suppose there is violation, you can file an affidavit,
or go on with your bill.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 20.
SHIRLEY V. ROSE, ESQ., M. P.

Mr. Serjeant JoNEs moved for a rule to show
cause why another writ of distringas should not issue
against the defendant, who had privilege of Parlia-
ment. One writ had already issued ; but as the
property levied under it did not amount to more
than would just cover the debt, and as the expenses
were thus left unpaid, the plaintiff prayed the Court
that another distringas might issue, to obtain a levy
that would meet them. The object of the Court
in issuing these writs was to compel the defendant's
appearance by levying on his property so much as
would secure the indemnity of the plaintiff in the
• amount of his damages and costs.—The Court
granted the rule.

Wheat.

Aberdeen
8erwick,.,,.,...
Coldstream
Cupar
Dundee ---
Elgin --

Inverness—...
Kelso
Kirkahly--
Perth-
it The size

56 72
48 51
50 54
70 74

64 64
60 70
50 55
59 76
64 78
of the in,

)ittmcal.

34 38
36 38

27 34 20 25
25 26 18 20 121 25
25 28 18 21 26 28
30 33 24 27 27 32
- 31 25 29
20 23 18 20 20
24 281 20 25 19 20
28 30 20 28 28 29 -
-
28 33 30 31 34
23 26 16 20 20 30
Imre varies throughout the country.

40 -

11ADDINGTON CORN Al A n KET.—June 19.

A small quantity of Barley in market-23 quarters sold,
top down 25., average up Is. Oats in middling supply-
-226 quarters sold-30 unsold, top 35., and average 11d.
down. A dull Wheat market, and nearly one-fourth of
the quantity unsold ; but the top price and average are
down Is. fid. Pease brought a higher average, and Beans
a lower thaw last day.
Wheat. Barley. Oats. Pease.
First 73s .5d 39s Od 31s Oil I 36s Od
Second 6Bs Od 37s Od 285 (Al 345 Od
Third
There were 285 qrs. of Wheat In market, 210 wherea
69 Unsold.-15 Grey.
3/. Bs. 9d. 2-12ths.

A veragi

Beans.
35s Od
34s Od
32s Od
were sold,