The Sun.
London, England, 1842-07-29 00:00:00

RAJA OF SATTARA.

Mr. HUME presented a petition from Puntaub
Shear', the deposed Raja of Sattara, who was now
a state prisoner at Benares. He had last year
offered a petition to the House on the same subject,
but as it was written in the Mahratta language, and un-
accompanied by an English translation, it had been with-
drawn. He now presented a petition from the same in-
dividual, written in the English language. The petition
was signed at Benares, on the Bth January, 1842, and was
sealed with the seal of the Mahratta kingdom of Sevajee.
It was attested to by four inhabitants of the Benares and
by a Magistrate. The petitioner stated that he
was the lineal descendant of Sevajee, the
founder of the Mahratta empire ; that he was
now the legitimate head of the Mahratta empire ; that
in 1819, on the deposition of the Peisshwa, he had been
restered by the British Government as a feudatory of the
British empire—that from that period, up to the
year 1835, he had enjoyed the unlimited confidence
of the Court of Directors, who in that year had sent him
a sword of honour, and stated that his conduct was
worthy of the imitation of the other native Princes;
that since that period he had been deposed, under the cir-
cumstances related in the petition to only a few of
which he (Mr. Hume) would allude then.
He stated that in 1836 he was accused of plotting against
the British Government. but his whole life ought to have
been 4 sufiluient answer to such an accusation, that the
Governor of Bombay was empowered to procure evidence
against him, as having violated the treaty which he had
entered into, but he referred to Presidents Duff;
Bing, and Robinson, in testimony of its faithful
observance ; that he was accused of conspiring against
the British Government, and entering into a treaty
with the Portuguese Government to procure three
thousand troops from Goa`; that an inquiry was
instituted, which was kept a secret from him; and that,
notwithstanding, the whole evidence against him was
declared to be worthless. He stated that his principal
servant was seized and .imprisoned; that he was kept
fur twenty-two mOnths in prison, in a state of torture,
till he signed a- document to save his life ; that the
charge of procuring 30,000 troops from Goa was so ab-
surd that the House could notgiveit evidence ; that he never
had more than 1,500 troops. and that to attempt any
such proceedirg PS he was charged With, was totally at
variance with his character ; that his brother was
placed in his stead on the throne, who was proved,
under his own handwriting, to have conspired to
injure the interest of the India Company ; that
he (the Raja of Sattara) had private property to
the amount of 350,000/ taken from him ; that
he was seized by the orders of Sir J. Carnac,
in his palace, to which he was never after allowed to re-
turn, and that he suffered all these losses upon. the vague
charge of bringing troops from Goa., whilst he was never
heard in his own defence. He therefore solicited from the
House a consideration of his case, and an investigation into
the treatment which he had received ; that the vast
power of England need fear no alarm, and that
it
.would tarnish the glory of her Majesty's
reign if an individual, once her Majesty's faithful
ally, now her prisoner, did not receive her protection.
That was the petition which he had received, and as it
was one of importance he begged to bring it up, and to
move that it be printed.
NOTICES OF AIGTION.

Mr. ITUMgsaid that, on Thursday next it would be
his duty to bring the subject of the petition which he had
just presented, before the House.
Dr. BOWRING gave notice that he would move early
next session for the re-appointment of the Select Com-
mittee appointed in 1837, to inquire into the mode in
hich the accounts of the colonies were kept, I‘ith the
view to some alteration.

Dr. BOW RING gave notice, on the part of the Hen.
Member for Greenock, that he would move for a Select
Committee to inquire into the official duties of the Lord
Advocate.

Mr. HUME gave notice that 1,..e would move for a re-
turn to show how 60,0001., granted to those engaged in
the battle of Navarino, was distributed.
Mr. I'. BUNCOMBE gave notice that he should, on
Monday, move to refer the petition of Dr. M'Douall and
the inhabitants of Deptford to a Select Committee, and
that the Committee should report thereon to the House.
PUBLIC MONUMENTS.

Mr. HAWES gave notice of his intention, on the
motion of the :Hon. Baronet the Member for Wiltshire
being submitted to the House for the erection of a mo-
mnuent to Sir Sydney Smith, to` move that the names
of Watt, Herschel], and Davy, be added.
, SOUTHAMPTON ELECTION.

Mr. MACKINNON stated that, agreeable to the
notice he had given, it had been his intention to move
for the new writ fur Southampton ; but in consequence
of it having been intimated to him that-it would be
more convenient that the ComMittee of Supply should
be'first disposed of, he would postpone his motion till
.after the Committee of Supply had been gone through.
Mr. T. DUNCOMBE hoped that the lion. Member
- would name aortae specific duy on which to make his
Motion. He had tt,petition from Southampton, praying
the suspension of the writ, which he would now present.
The Hon. Member having presented the petition,
Mr. MACKINNON observed that he would bring the
subject forward after the Committee of Supply had ksen
disposed of.
Sir J. EASTIMPE wished to know whether it was
competent for the Hon. Member to fix his own time to
bring for Ward such a motion ?
The SPEAKER said that it was perfectly competent
on the part of any Member to move, at any time, the
issue of a warrant.
NOTTINGHAM ELECTION.

Mr. S. CRAWFORD said that he had also a motion
on the paper for the issuing of a new writ for
,NoLting-
hem; But as it appeared to be the wish of thesHouse
• that the Committee of Supply should be proceeded with
first, he would postpone the motion till after the Com-
mittee of Supply.
Mr. V. SMITH wished to know what course the Go-
vernment intended to pursue after the disposal of the
Committee of Supply ?
Sir R. PEEL said that of course those Hon. Mem-
bers who had postponed their motions, in order that
the Committee of Supply might he proceeded. with,
ibtiifld have the preference of bringing those measuses
forward titter the Committee of Supply had been gone
through.
Mr. O'CONNELL trusted that no measure of import-
ance would be allowed to be .brought forward at a late
hotif:
Mr. SHARMAN CRAWFORD said he found that
several Hon. Gentlemen objected to his moving the Not-
tingham Writ after the Committee of Supply. He had no
desire to do anything hostile to her Majesty's,,,Ministers,
hut it was important, under the circumstances, that he
should proceed to move for the Writ then.
Sit ROBERT PEEL »aid the motion would take the
precedenCe &f other business.
Mr. T. DUNCOMPE staid he hoped that his Hon.
Friend would persevett iii the motion. The Hon. Mem-
ber opposite (Mr. Mackinnon) htiti consented to postpone
his motion, and now iv was to be postponed again.
• Sir R. PEEL thought that, it Member had a right to
bring forward a motion without notice. There was no
notice of the motion for the Southampton •
Mr. MACKINNON—I gave notice a week ago.
Sir R. PEEL—Then it was not on the paper.
An Hon. Member might certainly give notice at four
o'clock that he intended to bring forward a modem lie
could do that of right, but it was not in conformity with
the practice of the House, and he should be exceedingly
sorry to see that right often exercised. He thought these
motions were for mutual benefit—Hear. hear)—add he
did not think that it would be for general convenience
that motions should be brought forward without notice.
He hoped his Hon. Friend would give notice for Monday
next for the Southampton writ.
The SPEAKER said the Right Hon. Gentleman had
misunderstood him. The question which had been asked
was, whether the Hon. Member could move for the writ.
He (the Speaker) said he was perfectly competent for
any Hon.
_Member to move for a new writ at any time
'without notice. lie did not think it was competent to
a Member to give notice at four o'clock. That would
not be a notice. If he gave. notice it must be for a
future day and not the same day.
Sir R. PEEL said it appeared that notice had been
given for the Southampton writ, but it did not appear
on the paper. He was referring to the matter as a
dropped order.
Mr. 'MACKINNON thought it right to explain one
circumstance. On Monday he postponed the Southamp-
ton Writ, and he did not think it was necessary for him
to renew his notice.. lie was not aware that it was ne-
cessary. But he most distinctly Stated. on Monday last
that he should bring on the Southampton Writ this
evening. He did not wish to interfere with the
public business in taking the writ previous to the Com-
mittee of Supply. If the Right Hon. Gentleman wished
him to postpone the writ to Monday, he should have dis-
tinctly understood that he should bring the motion for-
ward at half-past four on Monday.
Mr. R. YORKE hoped the discussion would take pre-
cedence of all other motions on Monday,.as it was a
matter of great importance.
DANISH CLAIMS.
Mr. HUTT rose, but be was rendered almost inaudible
from the noise occasioned by Menibers leaving the
House. Ile said be would detain the House a
very short time. Ile could assure the House that
it was with considerable reluctance that be had
been led to bring on a new subject at EC,
late a period of the session, but the parties who had en-
trusted the case to his. hands, felt- that their interests
would be prejudiced by delay. The Danish claims had
existed since 1807. In- that year an expedition was
fitted out, fur the pitepose of guarding the Danish
fleet, by' this Government. The Danish Government
naturally felt exasperated by such a proceeding,
anehreprisals took place, and the Danish Government
confiscated the book debts of certain British subjects ;
and, proceeding further, they seized all British
vessels and British c.lrgoes, which they were en-
abled to lay their hands upon. In regard to the first
of these, compensation had hem granted ; but
the Crown had refused to make compensation to the
other parties, on the ground that they were involved in
the same situation as the subjects of all other nations,
whoSe property fell into the hands of enemies at the
first outbreak of a war. On the" 'other • hand,
these parties said this was not a true description
of the case, as the war had not taken taken plaee
the t,e ‘,f tl: capture of their property, and
welr whether they
,wqre reprisnls,
That was the view taken by the claimants theraseltes,

and that was the light upon which he looked at that
subject. The point for the consideration of the House
was, whether or not the course that had been pursued
was a declaration of war.—(ll: ar, hear.) It had
been maintained that the Government of Denmark
were, at the period to which he alluded, at war with the
Government of this country ; that the Danish Govern-
ment had seized upon British property by way of
reprisals, and therefore war had commenced be-
tween the twp states. The late Attorney-Gene-
ra:- the Member for Worcester, who had made
the me,;t elaborate and complete defence of this
case, was' of opinion the war had actually com-
menced. But, aettne`nnately for his Learned Friend's
argument, no such docna:ent, as had been alluded
to, had been found' in the Pifice. It was true •
that a document had been found in the office
which was' considered 'as a declaration of war.
but. the document was not looked upon by,the SoYe:eign
of Derunark, or the penple of that country, as such tv
declaration. That document emanated from ea sm-d1
town in Denmark, and it was signed only by
the authorities of the town. It was therefore
with great astonishment that he had heard
his Learned Friend the late Attorner-General describes
that document as a declaration of war, It was not con-
sidered so by Denmark nor by the authorities inthis coun-
try. Now, with respect to the facts of the case. A Danish
vessel, called the Orion, was captured in the year 1807,
and the - subject of 'the- legality of the capture was
brought before the Admiralty .shortly afterwards.
Lord Stowell had decided that any vessel taken previous
to the month of November was not a prize of War.
Neither the Danish Government nor the British Go-
vernment had ever considered that we had been at war
previous to the declaration of war by the Govern.
reent of Denmark. If that were the case, he
contended that the parties new in question were
justly
_entitled to the compensation which they
sought. But even though they had not such a title as
could be strictly enforced, the House would recollect,
that the equitable right of the parties had been admitted
by themselves upon various. occasions. He really thought
they would now be hardlyjustified in reversing their own
repeated decisions. And after the House had allowed
the claims it would .not become the Government
of this great country to shelter themselves under forms
or technicalities in refusing them. They should con-
sider what was due to the.dignity of the House of Corn-
'nuns, and not to decline to accede to the repeated mani-
festations of its wishes. He would not press the subject
further upon. that occasion. He should only say
that if compensation were denied to these parties,
such a course would be discreditable to the Go-
vernment, unworthy of the character of Parliament,
and would remain a scandal in - the annals
of this country. He would say no more upon the sub-
ject, and Would not press any motion respecting it. He
should not have brought the matter under the conside-
ration of the House that evening, in the midst of the
many public questiors which called for their immediate
dclil:eration, and in the present unsettled state of
our finances, were it not that the parties interested
klt that their. case might be prejudiced by
observing a total silence. He had introduced
the subject, principally for the purpose of reserving the
rights of parties, and in order that it might not be sup-
posed upon any future occasion that they had abandoned
their claims.

Mr. HUME was glad that his Hon. Friend did not
intend to press his motion. In seconding th4.t motion
he was anxious to make one or two observations. This
question was. one in which the national honour
was concerned, and it had been longer before
the House than any other. Twenty-three years
. ago he (Mr. Hume) had first divided in favour of these
claims. Then the whole of the claims were refused
Since then, after a lapse of two years, two-thirds of
thoSe claims had been granted, and one-third only now
remained. After •three decisions of the House in
favour of those claims, faith ought to have been
kept with the claimants. He thought that both
the late Government and the present Government in
refusing justice to these claimants were wrong. If there
were any error in regard to dates that ought not to stand
in the way of their doing justice. In the estimates
fin- the present year they had voted a sum of
10,0001. to settle some Portuguese claims, which
were due in 1810. Therefore, the length of time which
had elapsed ought not to prevent justice from being done.
Her Majesty's Government were willing to pay
away money whete there was no claim, but
they refused to pay a just claim. This obstinate
denial of justice was discreditable to the Government.
They had voted a sum to liquidate the claims of M.
Sampayo, which had accrued from 1808 to 1814. There
had been no objection made to pay the foreigner, why
should there be any objection to pay the English claimants?
He hoped that the Government would see the pro-
priety of taking the question into their serious consi-
deration before the next session, and would
pay the last third due to the Danish claimants ;
who would, even if that - was paid, suffer severe less,
inasmuch as they would only have been paid the princi-
pal, and have lost the interest fur thirty-five years.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, un-
derstanding that the Honourable 'Gentleman had
brought forward his motion merely with a view.
of entering his protest, thought discussion unne-
cessary 'at preasnt, would therefore not enter
at present into the merits of the case. He (the 'Chan-
cellor of the Exchequer) had already expressed his opi-
nion on those claims, which. expression of opinion had
not been given merely since he sat on that side: of
the House, for when he had sat on- the'''Otliee'side.
he had supported the then Chancellor of th4triliter
in his opposition to these claims. - He• feA the{'-'
lion. Member for Montrose, that if a ,clanfiNSAa:- just,.
one, length of time could be no bar to it 3 adraisssien,
he could not agree that because they had7\kifelit'Sum'
of money to ,Mr. Sampayo, 'that, thtkefors,._they ought '
to vote a stun of money to the Thuush claimants. The.
claim of' Mr. Stunpayu was admittedi; the
only question in debate-, was. aa,,,to :amount, ,inthe
ascertaining of which time of coursehad been' occcupied..
The discussion of the Danish claims rested uniin it die-
ferent footing. lie uould not admit the justice of those
claims. The concession of them would involve the'',
country in incalculable expense on some - future..
occasion.—(Hear, hear.) ~He could not find 'anything
in the law of nations to justify thcAr claims. When the
Hon. Gentleman brought the subject before.* House,
he would go fully into it ; but understanding that the
Hon. Gentleman did not .I:neap ;.o press, his Motion; he
would not go further into the question, which could only
be further discussed to the interruption of other business.
The motion was then withdrawn.
[LEFT SITTINO4

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.

GREENWICH POLICE.

Yesterday, the four persons who had been held to bail for
their appearance on a charge of inciting the mob to rescue Dr.
M'Douall, from the custody of the police, on. Wednesday night,
appeared before Mr. Jeremy. They gava the nantes, John
Dowling, No. 8, Marlborough-place, Chelsea; Conrad War-
ren, No. 4, Waterloo-place, Knightsbridge; Joseph Mucklow,
Rotherbithe-street, Rotherhithe, and Thomas Varden, Si-
mond's-row, Somers Town. The Court and its vicinity was
as much crowded as on the previous day. Dowling's cas‘i
was first heard.
John White, IEO R, was sworn, and said, I was at the meet-
ing on Tuesday night. Upon Dr. 111‘Douall being taken into
custody, I saw the prisoner seize and endeavour to rescue him,
calling out to the mob, " Down with the - police ; don't•
let them take the Doctor," which he called out several times.
I seized him, when he said, " You - butcher, leave go of
me." I kept him in custody until he got to the station-house.
In answer to the prisoner witness said he did not say "I mutt
have one of these men."

William Bassett, 237 11, stated that he beard Dowling re-
peatedly call out "Down with the police, down with the butchers,
to the rescue ; don't let them take the Doctor."
Cross-examined—l did not say at the chapel " I have marked
you." J had no doubt at the station about your being the man
who use the expressions. The Superintendent told me not to
as: what I did not hear.
Mr. )lallalieu was sworn to the fact of Bassett identifying
Dowling as the man who had been most active in inciting
the mob.
A person named Cooke, a taller, living in Lisson-grove, was
called by the prisoner. He stated that he had been invited to
address the meeting in the Broadway, which he did from the
pump.. •
Mr. JEREMY—WiII you swear that you was invited to &W-
-oken the meeting in the Broadway ? Witness—l am not
bound to answer every question.
Mr. JEREMY—You are bound to answer all questions by the
Court which are likely to promote the ends of justice. Wit-
ness—l was invited.
Mr. JEREMY—That was before any disturbance. Witness
—I deny there was any disturbance.
The witness, however, declared that he was with Dowling,
who was very quiet, at half-past nine, when it was proved that
he was locked up in the station-house at half-past eight.
Mr. JaaestY, addressing Dowling, said it was better for his
sake that the case should go no further, and the prisoner agree-
ing to that, he was willing to take a very considerate view of
the matter, and only required him to find sureties for
his future good behaviour.
By the advice of Dr. M'Douall the prisoner agreed to this,
and bail being given, he was discharged.
The eases against the other prisoners were of a similar de-
scription, and were disposed of in the same manner.
Mr. JEREMY said application bad been made to him by Dr.
M'Douall for a copy of the charges made against him and
the other individuals. He (Mr. J.) had no power to grant
the request, the police being the party to whom he must apply.
Dr. M'Douall said be had applied and it had been refused.
Mr. Mallalieu replied that the sheet containing the charges
would be forwarded to the Police Commissioners that after-
noon, to whom Dr. M'Douall might apply ; but he certainly
would not allow him to see it.
Dr. lll`Douall—l shall then take two witnesses with me to
London to prove your refusal. He then left the Coutt.

PRINCE ALBERT'S HARRIERS.—The new pack of
harriers, consisting of an effective 13 couple, besides- about
seven couple of puppies, lately ,purchasod by his Royal High-
ness Prince Albert from Mr. Smith, in the Isle of Wight,
had a 6' trial day" last week in the forest, in the neighbour-
hood of Windsor, when they proved their capabilities to be
very first-rate. Major-General Wetnyss (Clerk-Marshal to
his Royal Highness), and Mr. G. E. Anson (Treasurer to the
Prince), met at the bad: a Choltham-common, where a fine
hare was unbagged by Mr. Maynard, which afforded a beau-
tiful run over at least seven miles of country, which were
covered in twenty-five minutes, and the hare killed. The
pack was hunted by King, brother of Harry King, one of the
whippers-in to her ;Majesty's buckhounds, who has been ap-
pointed his Royal Highness's huntsman. The hounds, in size,
strength, and speed, are equal to the fleetest foxes, with which
the neighbourhood abounds. They are kennelled at Cumberland-
lodge, in the Great Park, under the care and superintendence of
Mr. .Quarton (the Prince's stud groom), in the kennel appro•
plated for the Royal pack of harriers many years since.
Lady Margaret Marsham was safely delivered of a
son on Monday at Bosley House, Kent, and her Ladyship and
nfant are both going on very favourably.
BARNSLEY LINEN TRADE.—It gives us pleasure in
baring to state that the lint trade at this place continues to
improve. During the present week a considerable number of
hands have been set to work ; and we have no doubt, from in-
quiries which have been made by large purchase's, that the
where of the: locuis in the • town and ncighhuurhood tri l wry
shortly be heard playing the good old tune el" icii-a-ty,
nack-a-ty."—Leeds Journal.

ASSIZE' INTEIA,IGENGE, H,9":E3b
WES TE lily Ci CUlT—Ezeter, July 2i. jtit
THE QUEEN V. A'tES. -
Sir T. WILDE, who was specially retained for the defentlo'
in this case, earns into Court this morning and.suokete*
Justice NVightman as to the time of taking the
The Learned JUDGE said he. multi give up two days and.
half to it, but not more. •
The circumstances attending this case are =o peculiar t
h*
some observations upon it are required. It is an indictmell
got up by subcription against a gentleman of fortune, 511191
has recently bought some property in the neighbesurbooi•
Lynne, for obstructing and blocking up a foot-path which 11°,
through some portion of this property, and was one of the fires
attractions of the watering-place of L)tne. The case first cite
on before Mr. Justice Coleridge, at the Assizes fur this count/
some year or two since ; and after the case for the proseculo
had been brought to a close, that Learned Judge told the Al
that if they agreed with him in opinion there would at once iN
an end of the matter, because in his opinion the prosectlo
had tilled in making out such a case as entitled them to a it
is 4 jct. The Jury said they did not agree with tl
Lea.'ned Judge. Mr. Justice Coleridge then 6,.%
served, that perhaps they did not understand what'll'
real question vos, and he then explained the law of user 1.:
them, but still the Jury were inflexible, and would not give,
verdict of acquittal. .1-;:s, Lordship then said, that if the cti.;
proceeded, it would occupy a great length of time, and mie
detain them in Court nearly the whole night; but the Jog
would not give nay, and 11::s Lerdshiy said that he shoo
therefore, at once discharge them, as he must go on to /30.;
mm. The parties concerned in the prosecution continued
to keep up the subscription, and. contrary to expectation, uef,
enabled again to come into the battle-field, end the case Or'
on again la,t spring, before Mr, Justice Erskine, when, after!,
long investigation, a Special Jis,-y returned a verdict aga"!'t
the defendant, thereby, for the urcknent, establishing the rikne
of the public to. this foot-path. I,he defendant went to 0
Court above, and obtained a rule fur a new trial ; and it ~
understood that it was isi come on at the present Assizes, le.v.
the subscribers are told that there is not anfficient time to tr.
their right, and that they must enter into a fresh subset ipto°
in order to bring the case on next :March, svi:en must mite:
tionably they must of necessity be told that the t.ime is still
short, for on this Circuit its the spring it is wi;11 very go'
difficulty the Judges can get home in time for Easter berm,
The postponement is the general subject of remark ar;el
cation, and persons ate not 'stemmed in the terms they use.

OXFORD ClRCUlT'—Stcfford, July 27.
Plisz PRLUS COURT.—(Before Lord Chief Justice

MACKAY V. STONIER.
This was an action of trespass for !else imprisonmesq
which Mr. Godson, Queen's Counsel, and kr. Yardley;
peered tor the plaintiff; and Air. Sergeant Ludlow and j"
Lee for the defendant, who bad p'eaded " Not Guilty
I'l
statute.
The plaintiff was a publican and boat-owner, and the -defer,,
dant the Superintendent of the Police at Stoke-upon-Tr MI
It appeared that the plaintiff was taken into custody bY
defendant on Monday night, the 27:h of September, on a ell':
of receiving deal boards, knowing them to have been storji"H
He was placed by the defendant in a small cell,
fastened by chains to an iron ring fixed in the floor,
was kept so confined until Thursday, the 30th of the 510-
month. The stipendiary Magistrate for the Potteries, ``,4,
lived within a mile of the station, and who sat on the 'l°,o
day and Wednesday at places nearer to the station Ph,
Tunstall, from whence the plaintiff was taken, .and
was actually at the station-house on Wednesday, in to
judicial capacity, was never applied to by the defendantf
hear the charge pretended to be preferred against the plaintrj,
However, on Thursday, in consequences of his strong and
td
dignant remonstrances, he was taken before the Alagistrs
and discharged, no evidence lietng offered. The cross-eslo
nation of the witnesses for the plaintiff, tended to show 'II
the cell above alluded to, which was the only place providea,
the Police Commissioners of Stoke-upon-Trent for the c°,6
venience of the constables in keeping their prisoners, wag to
insecure that strong measures were necessary to be take
detain them in safety. 101
Al' the commencement of the present actin; the

Ater the commencement ot
Spring Assizes, a bill was found against the plaintiff as 1 oir
ceiver of stolen goods, on which the plaintiff was tried 2,1!
present Assizes, but the Learned Judge stopped the case. los
Mr. Sergeant Luntow took several formal objectleo
(which were overruled) and then addressed the Jury for
defendant.
consulted
His Loanstue, having summed up, the Jury joi
a few moments, and in finding a verdict for the plaintiff, 0,,0
that they would leave it to his Lordship to fine the police `cpr•
he should think fit. 'the Lord Chief Justice declined e‘'
citing the discretion thus placed in his hands, and the Jur'',
reconsideration, assessed the damages at 20/.

The following fashionables took their depaS
yesterday afternoon, from the Brunswick Wharf, Blackwa,ll
the General Steam Navigation Company's splendid stOtbe
Rainbow, Captain J. Fite, for Antwerp, on their routs W
Rhine :—M M.P., r. Hodgson, Colonel Grove, Generslio
Moore Disnay, the Countess of Newburgh, the Hon. &rip.
Kennedy, the Hon. Admiral Mackay, Admiral Hawker/ .tint
Backhouse, Mr. Hibbert, of the Royal Mail Steens r
Company, and Major Pugh.

MONnwil

."

CE.
Ittiy -2 7. fill

dereodOlT
Is poke t.0.14.fq
rial.
ro days aria,j!

July 27. -,.-
TINP-P4'

Iprisonmentl.
r. Yardley;
,eloer "and IPP;
Not Guilty"1

and the -deft";
ke-upou.--Tr.l„
custody bi
ber, on a chair
re been st(%tli.
11 cell, his Jrvii
the floor, °1
)th of the 51:
Potteries, ,`;„
a on the
le station
aken, and ,0
nesdav, in Pt,
detendantl
nst 'he
s strong and
the Al agistrs
he cross-eso
ed to shoo' pf
lace provide a
0,
nt for the c'to
risoners, to
to be taken

at the
laintiff as a te
Was tried 30
the case. .00
rural objectlibi
the Jury for

V
ry consulted el
e plaintiff, ac'hyt
the police /I r
,e declined oeo,
tnd the Jury,

eir depT
rf, Blaelvorld;
)lendid stOno
to
heir routs , Sit
re Genets
a hon. Sir Mr,
LI Hawker, v.ei
Stearn PO

ENT.