The Sun.
London, England, 1845-10-07 00:00:00

LLOYD'S SHIPPING-(THIS DAY.

BoNnos, OcT. 7.—Wind this (lay at noon, S.W.; light
and hazy, with rain.
Ocr. 6.—Wind, E. and S.E.—Arrd. from the river,
and std., Thalia, Robinson, Cape of Good Hope.
Ponrsmourn, Our. 6.—Wind E. to N.E., squally.—Sld.
Windsor, Trescutt, Calcutta; Toronto, Tricker, New York.
Ocr. 6.—Wind E., fresh.—Sid. Mohawk, Parr,
Africa; Fingaltor, Craig, St. .John's, New Brunswick; Sir
Henry Pottinger, M'Kenzie, Ditto; James and Mary Sinnot,
Connor, Ditto; Crete (steamer), Candia.
LIVERrOOI„ OCT. 6.—Wind S.S.E., moderate.—Sid. Ben-
galee, I-long-Kong ; Lingard, Ditto; Courier, Johnson, Mau-
ritius; Bank, Valparaiso; Royal Adelaide, Holmes,
Rio 0 and Africa; Henrietta, Ditto ; Margaret, Jack-
son, Demerara; Messenger, Wilson, New Orleans Off port,
J)aunticss (ship) ; Dorisarma (bri).
Po tan u rrd. Ellen, Hood,- Quebec.
11.‘ IZTLEPOOL, Ocr. 6.—Whxd S.W.-51d. Idalia, Burther,
Gorotta ; Glenlyon, Embleton, Alexandria.
Ilf;isTor„ OCT. s.—The Lord Canterbury, arrived here from
Quebec. experienced heavy weather, and threw deck-load
overboard, and at one time had nine feet water in her hold.
Mu.ronn, OCT. 4.—The New Hope, Jones, of Fishguard,
way lost on Tregenin's Sand, in Ramsey Sound, 2d inst ;
crew and part of material saved. A quatitityreos,aa
fa.totre stores,
East
Bay.
parentiv American, has been picked up in y h
13ay•
MARYPORT, OCT, 6.—The Christian, Yeomand, on shore,
north side the harbour, has been got otrand into port.
PORTAOCGIE, OCT. s.—The Sincerity, Griffiths, of Car-
digan, from Teignmouth for the Clyde, got on shore on
the Cannon Rock this morning, was assisted oft without ap-
parent damage, and proceeded.
Ponritt-sn, Ocr. 3.—The Ellen, Hood, arrived here from
Quebec, grounded on a sand bank off the South Pier, was
assisted off ; reports have seen several dismasted vessels
in
the Gulf of St. Lawrence.
THE GLEN VIEW OF BELFAST.

A letor bas been received this morning at Lloyd's, from
the Admiralty, announcing Lieutenant Smyth, R. M. Steam
I'.icket Clyde having fallen in with, on her homeward
passage, in lat. 48 19 N, lon. 15. 14 W., the Glenview of
13elfast, timber laden, waterlogged, and abandoned ; her decks
inclined to break up.

OXFORD, Ocr. 4.—Mr. J. D. Dalgairns, M.A.
of Exeter College, in this University, who has been some
time resident with Mr. Newman, at Littlemore, has made his
formal submission to the Roman Catholic Church.
REPRESENTATION OF WIGAN.—Both parties are
still actively canvassing the electors, but sufficient is already
known of the state of political feeling in the borough to make
it almost certain, that unless Mr. Thicknesse's party resort to
enormous bribery, Captain Lindsay must be returned. It
seems to be generally understood, that some of the electors
are hanging back in the expectation that bribes will be
(Hero], as if any man in his senses (to say nothing of the
iniquity of such a course) would be fool enough to buy him-
self into a Parliament that has little more than a year to
live.—.llanchester Courier.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
BO W-STREE7'.
Yesterday a dark-featured, middle-aged man, described
as John Comstick Clinton, merchant, of Somerset-street,
Whitechcpel, was brought before Mr. Hall, on a warrant
granted by his Worship, under the Act of Treaty be-
tween her Majesty and the United States of America,
for " giving up criminals fugitive from justice," &c.,
charged with being concerned in the forgery by which
the Messrs. Little and Co., bankers and stockbrokers, of
New York, were defrauded of 23,000 Mexican dollars,
in April, 1841.
The prisoner, it may be remembered, was apprehended
on the same charge upon the warrant of the Foreign
Secretary of State, and taken before Mr. Jardine on
precisely the came day (October 6), in 1843. On that
occa.ion he was discharged on two grounds—it being
the opinion of his Worship, in the first place, that the
clause in the Treaty Act passed in 1842, which directed
that " copies" of the depositions taken in America should
be produced, had not been complied with, the " original'.
depositions having been forwarded instead ; and, in the
second place, that the magistrate, not having been pre-
viously applied to for a warrant for the apprehension of
the prisoner (as the Act directed), had no authority in
the case. From that time to the present, it appears, no
further steps had been taken. A Bill amending the
original Act had received the sanction of the two States.
and on Sunday last the prisoner was again taken into
custody by Inspector Haynes, the warrant having been
greeted by Mr. flail the same morning.
- Jr. Mullins, of the firm of Bush and Mullins, attended

for the prosecutors, and Mr. Sheard, from Mr. Parker's
office, for the prisoner.
Mr. Sheard said, he had only just received informa-
tion of the prisoner's apprehension, and begged for a
short remand to enable him to have the assistance of I.lr.
Chambers, who defended the prisoner on the last occa-
sion. There were other important reasons why a re-
mand would be essential to the prisoner, who required
time to produce witnesses.
Mr. HALL felt beund to proceed with as little delay as
possible, and certainly without contemplating the neces-
sity for a remand.
Mr. Sheard said, material objections would be raised,
on the prisoner's behalf, to the application of the Treaty
Acts, passed after the alleged offence, to his case. Mr.
Chan:viers, who had urged these points on a former oc-
casion, should therefore, in justice to the prisoner, have
an opportunity of being present.
Mr. HALL had no objection to wait a short time, until
Mr. Chambers had been sent for.

At the expiration of about an hour Mr. Sheard re-
turned with Mr. Clarkson, the barri3ter, with whom he
was in consultation on the bench, w hen Mr. M. Cham-
bers, Q.C., who had been previously retained by Bush
and Mullins for the prosecution, arrived to conduct the
case for his new clients and former adversaries.
This circumstance appeared to astonish Mr. Sheard,
who had calculated upon the co-operation of the Learned
Counsel by whose advocacy the prisoner gained his ac •
quittal on the last occasion.
Mr. M. Chambers briefly stated the case, which was
one of considerable national importance. He alluded to
the Treaty Act of August,lB42, and also to the subsequent
Bill to amend the same, the latter of which merely re-
moved some of the difficulties which had been experi-
enced in the operation of the former one, and in conse-
quence of which the prisoner was discharged when taken
before Mr. Jardine in 1842, on a charge arising out of
the same transaction. No question could now arise
upon the subject, as the Secretary of State for Foreign
Affairs had certified that the requisitions of those Acts
had been fully complied with. It would be the duty of
the magistrate, therefore, simply to act upon the written
and oral testimony which would be submitted to his
judgment regarding the prisoner, as he would an ordi-
nary person who bad been apprehended within his own
urisdiction. The difference could be only in the issue
of the case—the prisoner at the bar being sent to take
his trial before the tribunals of another country, instead
of being tried by our own.
Mr. Clarkson applied for the immediate remand of the
prisoner, who bad been apprehended under the most ex-
traordinary circumstances. In the year 1843 (and he
would call upon his friend, Mr. Chambers, who was then
the advocate of the man whom he now opposed, to con-
firm what he stated), the same parties were in motion
against the prisoner, who, after being kept in prison
from June to October, was discharged by the magis-
trate because they failed in making out a case against
him. He had been ever since a resident in England,
and if any evidence, got sip in another country in his
absence, were to be admitted against him, it would be
no more than sheer justice to allow him copies of the
depositions, and an opportunity, if he required it, of
meeting the charges by counter-testimony. What was
the present position of the prisoner ? The prosecutors
had laid their hands upon 2,0001, or thereabouts, depo-
sited in the Union Bank by the prisoner (having pre-
viously indemnified the directors of the bank), and conse-
quently, he had commenced an action for the recovery of
the amount, judgment upon which was to be pronounced
in the city the very next day. The prosecutors knew this,
and hence the course adopted by them. He (Mr. Clark-
son) had been so hastily instructed on the matter,
that he hoped his Worship would, by remanding the
prisoner for a week or a fortnight, enable him to do jus-
tice to his client, and his client to do justice to him-
self, by examining more minutely the multifarious
circumstances of the case as alleged against him. He
apprehended that nothing so monstrously unjust as send-
ing the prisoner out of the country before this oppor-
tunity were given him could be contemplated by his
Worship, who was expressly enjoined by the Act to
judge of the case as he would one of every-day occur-
rence within the jurisdiction of his own Court. He
might refer to other important points in this case, in
which, he should contend, the Act could have no refer-
ence whatever, being of subsequent date ; but for,,the
present he should confine himself to his applicationlfor
an immediate remand. _

—Mr. Chambers was unwilling to object to the applica-
tion of his friend, but doubted whether the Acts in
question, which directed that the proceedings should be
taken " with all convenient speed," empowered the
magistrate to grant a remand. This point he should,
therefore, leave in his Worship's hands. He had almost
forgotten the circumstances of the case when before
under the consideration of the Bench ; but he believed
that the charge, as it now stood, was based upon a
document exhibiting a forgery in two respects—the
amount said to be deposited, as well as the name
of the depositor, being altered. Should the magis-
trate believe that this charge was established by the
depositions and commit upon that ;conviction, it would
then be in the power of his friend to apply for a writ of
habeas corpus, and submit the objections which he had
to offer to the superior authority.
Mr. HALL remarked that the circumstances of this
case were of a very peculiar nature, differing in an im-
portant respect from those that came before him in the
ordinary way. He sat there to take the side of neither
party, but merely to discharge:a duty, which he trusted
he should have the firmness to do' according to the con-
viction of his mind ; but it should be remembered that
when an ordinary prisoner was brought before him, he
usually proceeded to the investigation of his case in total
ignorance of the particulars of the charge against him,
whilst in the prest ut case he was actually obliged, by the
Act of Parliament, to make himself master of every
fact, as recorded in the depositions, before granting the
warrant.

Mr. Clarkson—ln that respect you have an important
advantage over the prisoner.
Mr. HALL—It might be considered an advantage if it
was the province of the magistrate to connect with his
own the functions of au advocate. Whether he felt dis-
posed, however, to grant a remand, or otherwise, it was
quite clear that in this, as in all other cases, some evi-
dence must be previously taken. The depositions would
be read over to the prisoner, and it would be found that
the facts of the case, however massive was the appear-
ance of the depositions, were comprised in a very narrow
compass.
Mr. Clarkson objected to the admission of the certifi-
cate of the Foreign Secretary of State (before alluded
to) in the absence of proof of Lord Aberdeen's signa-
ture. _ _ _

A messenger was consequently dispatched to the pri-
vate secretary of his Lordship, Mr. Dawkins, who at-
tended at a later period of the afternoon, and identified
the sigr.ature.
Mr. HALL observed that the second clause of the ori-
ginal Act authorised the reception of " copies" of the
depositions, which, it had been held, rendered the pro-
duction of the original copies insufficient. He was net
of this opinion, and Lord Kenyon had held that the
" originals" in such a case were admissible. Still there
were adverse opinions, and he had, therefore, used both
the copies and the originals for the purposes of this
inquiry.
The depositions, as taken in New York before the Dis-
trict Attorney and Recorder of the City, together with
the certificates accompanying them, were put in and
read. It appeared that on the 15th of April, 1841, a
person, calling himself " Nathaniel Brittain," went to
the prosecutors' office, in Walpole-street, New York,
and produced a certificate of deposit purporting to be
drawn upon the bank of New Orleans for 23,000 Mexi-
ean dollars. A cheque for the amount (less 1 per cent.)
was given to him, and afterwards a party, alleged to be
the prisoner, called and received the cash in gold. Other
evidence went to show that a man named Charles Webb,
of Philadelphia, was in concert with him.
John Dieter Poe, clerk to Messrs. Little and Co., the
prosecutors, deposed that he compared the copies with
the original depositions in the District Attorney's
office at New York. He spoke to the signature of the
Recorder to the original certificates, and saw other points
of form.

Cross-examined—Was not present at the examination
of the Witness.
held examined himself before the Dis-
trict Attorney (who .
wssa
the public prosecutor) in his
private office. Witne
elld no public office in America.
Was not in England in
43 Came to England in
do Came
into the hands
of Mr. Mullins, the solicitor (in
England) to the prose-
cutors. January, 1845, and gave theB
Ile-examined—He believed that every effort had been
since made to apprehend the prisoner.
Mr. Clarkson denied this statement, and expressed
rise that such a question should be put to the hisurp
wit-
ness, who could know nothing at all about it.
The same witness was then examined as to his own
depositions, and repeated the statements made by him
in New York. He recollected cashing the cheque for
23,000 dollars, and identified the prisoner at the bar as
the person to whom he paid the amount in gold. The
prisoner held a bag, into which witness placed the gold,
dropping some sovereigns at the time on the floor. The
prisoner remarked at the time that he (witness) might
have them if he liked, as he was in a hurry to leave.
Witness thought the prisoner's manner was very extra-
ordinary.
Cross•examined—Had' not seen the prisoner from
that day (April 15, 1841) up to the present time since
his appearance at the bar. Could positively swear that
he
e was the person. He was not altered in his appear-
awnecree,
laenftdutpaolknedthine aftodoere.p tonevvitnoefssvopiciec.kedNtohesomvea
sovereigns
were
and put them in the bag.
Thomas John Sowtow deposed that he was a mer-
chant's clerk, living at Bermondsey. He was formerly
in the service of Messrs. Sanders, of the Hull saw-mills.

On the bankruptcy of the firm, in the latter part of 1841,
the premises were taken by the prisoner, Mr. Clinton,
and a Mr. Charles Webb, to whom he acted as clerk
until February, 1843. The prisoner was chiefly in
London, but came to Hull when the December balances
were due in 1842. Witness knew the prisoner's hand-
writing. He believed the words in blue ink on the cer-
tificate of deposit, were in his handwriting. The signa-
ture " Nathaniel Brittain," written twice at the back of
the document, was in the handwriting of his partner,
Charles Webb.
Cross-examined—Had been in one or two situations
since that time as clerk. Mr. Mullins came to witness
upon the subject. Did not expect any remuneration.
Would have scorned to make any such stipulation.
Had never expressed a doubt as to the prisoner's hand-
writing upon the document produced. The prisoner
owed witness no money. He always behaved very
honourably to witness.
By Mr. HALL—Clinton never went by any other name
whilst witness knew him.
Mr. Chambers having said that he had no other evi-
dence to offer,
Mr. Clarkson addressed the Bench for the prisoner
declaring that if it was intended that anything like jus-
tice should be done in this case, a remand mus be
He denounced the species of evidence taken in tYeaed.
Dis-
trict Attorney's private office at New York as of the
most trumper,y nature, such as could never be admissi-

ble in any English court of justice. He concluded by
again demanding for his client a privilege which would
be conceded to any Englishman—the privilege of dis-
proving the charges brought thus irregularly against
him.

Mr. HALL said, although it was not desired of him to
offer an opinion as to the Treaty Act being of a prospective
or retrospective character, he could not, as the subject hid
been so frequently alluded to, pass it over alto-
gether without remark. He should not attempt to
decide so grave a question himself, but would
gladly leave in the hands of the Learned Judges, to
whom the case might be submitted, in the event of
ulterior proceedings being• taken on behalf of the pri-
soner. till he was of opinion that there was nothing in
the clauses of the Act that could be regarded as limiting its
operation to offences occurring after the date thereof,
and he was strengthened in this opinion by the fact that
the French treaty contained a clause expressly extending
the operation of the Act to all offences, whether of prior
or subsequent date. With regard to the application
for a remand, he would only say that, looking at the
requisitions of the Treaty Act, and remarking that no
general rule could be laid doss n in such matters (which
must be left to the discretion of the magistrate), he was
bound to express hims/ if satisfied that such a priori
fucie case hai been established by the evidence before
him as justified him in taking that course which was
defined by the terms of the treaty between this country
and the United States. It was his duty to allow no
unnecessary delay to take place, and therefore he should
certify his committal of the prisoner to the Government,
who would act accordingly. It was satisfactory to him
to know that if he had erred his error might be cor-
rected by a higher authority.
Mr. Clarkson applied for a copy of the depositions.
Mr. HALL said it was unusual to grant such applica-
tions, and therefore refused it.
The case, with its numerous delays, occupied the
whole of the day, to the entire exclusion of all other
business from the Court. The other charges were con-
sequently taken by Mr. Twyford in a waiting-room.,
SOUTHWARK.

Yesterday Henry Killorby, the lad remanded on Thurs-
day last, on the charge of sending anonymous letters,
containing oxalic acid, to several of the inhabitants of
Southwark, was brought up for re-eximination.
The Rev. Mr.llorton, rector of St. George's, togetherwith
the churchwardens and several of the parishioners, at-
tended the examination.
When the prisoner was placed at the bar Mr. COT-
TINGHAM inquired if he had any legal adviser? The
prisoner's father stepped forward and replied in the ne-
gative, observing that he was so conscious of the inno-
cence of his son that he did not consider it requisite to
employ any legal gentleman.
Mary Ann Holmes, servant of a Miss Ward, to whom
one of the anonymous letters had been delivered, said
she was convinced the prisoner was not the person who
gave her the letter.
Sergeant Kendall said, that the prisoner's father was
a straw bonnet cleaner in White-street, and that he used
oxalic acid in the course of his trade. Several of the
anonymous letters had paste upon them of rather a pe-
culiar description, and not only did the prisoner's father
use such paste in his business, hut it was also used in
the stationery warehouse in the City, where the prisoner
was employed.
Mr. COTTINGII.IISI said he did not wish to question the
elder Killorby on the subject, as he had no inclination
to call a father against his son.
A witness proved that the prisoner was at an office in
London-street, Fenchurch-street, between eleven and
twelve o'clock oil Monday last, in the vicinity of a branch
post-office where one of the anonymous letters was posted
at the very time.
Sergeant Kendall stated that when he took the pri-
soner into custody he found two clasp knives in his pos-
session, one of which had a long and sharp-pointed
blade, and was carefully wrapped up in paper. The
sergeant added, that he mentioned that fact as the writer
of some of the anonymous letters threatened to cut the
throats of some of those whom he addressed.

Another anonymous letter was produced, which was
addressed to the magistrate, the writer declaring that
the accused was wholly innocent of the charges upon
which he was brought up to that Court; that he (the
writer) was the real offender, and added that he should
cease to perecute people any more if the prisoner was
liberated.

The Magistrate here referred to the letter addressed to
Mr. Stead, the parish-clerk of St. George's, in which the
writer threatened to set fire to St. George's Church if he
did not repeat some vile insinuations against a Mrs.
Spriggs on the Sunday duting service. The Magistrate
inquired if the accus( d had any facilities for carrying
such a threat into execution ?

Two witnesses, bell-ringers of St. George's Church,
were then called, and from their evidence it appeared
that the prisoner was in the habit of assisting in ringing
the bells of that church, and that he frequently attended
during the service in the church. The witness had also
seen Miss Elizabeth Spriggs attending divine worship.
(Miss Spriggs was one of the persons to whom the
letters above referred to were sent inclosing poison.)
Mr. COTTINGHAM inquired if the prisoner had any
communication with either of the witnesses respecting
the letter sent to Mr. Stead containing the threat to set
fire to the church ?

Jenkins, one of the witnesses, replied that he asked
the prisoner if Mr. Stead had announced to the congre-
gation the words used in the letter relative to Mrs.
Spriggs, and the answer the prisoner gave was in the
affirmative, but that they were in so low a tone of voice
that the people in the church could hardly hear them.
Mr. Stead was examined, and in reply to Mr. Cotting-
ham, he said that of course ho had not alluded in any
way to the contents of the letter referred to, but that he
had acquainted the churchwardens of the fact and the
threat of the writer to burn the church.

Mr. COTTINGHAM inquirtd if there were means of
carrying out such a threat as that used, whether a person
employed in the belfry could have access to any part
where there were materials of a combustible nature?

Mr. Stead replied that there was a quantity of shav-
ings and dry wood near the belfry, and that the place
was easy of access to those employed in ringing the bells;
but since the receipt of the letter alluded to, all matters
of a combustible description have been removed out of
the place. He added that the prisoner was engaged in
the belfry, and was present there almost every Sabbath
day.
Mr. COTTINGHAM, addressing the prisoner, said that
although the writing in the letters was not identified as
his, still the evidence adduced against him that day
strengthened the suspicions as to his being the person
by whom they were sent ; the case, however, was far
from being so complete as to justify him at present in
sending it before a jury. The prisoner, if he had a
mind to make any statement, or to make any remark on
the evidence already brought forward, might do so, but
with this caution, that whatever he did say might here-
after be used against him; after that caution he was at
liberty to act as he thought proper on the occasion.
The prisoner said that he did not wish to say any-
thing at present.
The prisoner's father said that he had just grounds
for believing that the whole affair had arisen out of the
jealous feelings of two women residing in the parish.
In the course of the inquiry it was stated that since
the prisoner's apprehension no anonymous letters had
been received by the parties to whom so many had been
previously addressed containing poison.
Mr. COTTINGHAM, having consulted with some of the
parochial officers, said that the further investigation of
the case should he postponed for the purpose of procur-
ing further evidence, and that he should accept of bail to
the amount of 150/. for the prisoner's appearance.
The prisoner's father and another gentleman entered
into the required sureties, and he was set at large.

ON STARCH FROM DISEASED POTATOES.—It is
desirable that no delay should take place in communicating
to the unfortunate possessors of diseased crops of potatoes a
use to which they may be applied advantageously. I have
very recently had an opportunity of being present at a mi-
croscopical examination of the structure of the bad potatoes,
made by Dr. Paget and Mr. I. Anthony, both of Caius Col-
lege, Cambridge, in which it was observed that the globules
of starch were not at all injured by the fungus which was
destroying the other parts of the potato. It immediately
occurred to those gentlemen that good starch might be pre-
pared from the bad potatoes. They, accordingly, obtained
some of the very worst potatoes that could be got at Cam-
bridge, and, by reducing them to a pulp, and then washing
it, they were successful in obtaining the starch in quite as
good a state as any that could have been made from
potatoes in the most healthy state. This seems to be a very
valuable fact, as it shows that some good use may be made
of even those potatoes in which the disease has made great
progress, and which have become unfit for food, owing to the
dieosctata:-oof the vegetable tissue, and the spreading of the fun-
gus. I see that Mr. Berkeley has observed that the globules
of starch are uninjured; we may, therefore, probably con-
erleuaddeeertyshat such is always the case, and that crops apparently
only fit to be destroyed may now be converted to use. I need
say not! ivnoegusscTeolun.cerning the ninny valuable purposes to which
of
syixAtLsytmarch may be applied, nor the mode of preparing it,
are well known—better, probably, to most of your
_ than to me,— C. C. Babington, St. John's College,
Cambridge.
port for orders'.
e
whose service aor
from—
Tlh_r
variousptihl
oet
ac pilotage
alone
coo
of the
paid
11, aeswt
foro world
dteheeekas
called
edvesselsaat
upwardsthai
st
w
Dutch steam-vessel
averagel:ialretn,is distributed amongst a valuable class of indus-
trious of a/. would Tofouanint
otost3imoop/o.,rtei.a-nhticchhafroarettehre.
heardt
to Bi. s.
Batavia, tolt
rhioe(
salt os
preparingA
in s()hnorctlatyi.m.
to e
Ala,
rgolocaerwegieet
ni tab,zrauty:-
a e
r vesselsh oe f calling(wiiarcr itsi
oiflnoosrwoohrfdeterhre
,es
El 3711" WITH VIOLENCE..—On ce Gazette
Consul,H AR; Broad,tonn
Wed-
nesday night last, between ten and eleven o'clock, as a man
named John Cunison, servant to Mr. S. A. Clarke,
of Grin-
bury Lodge, Writtle, was returning home from this town,where
he had been receiving 11. 2s. 6d. on his own account,
when
passing Mr. Hammond's wood, in Cherry-garden-lane, he
unwell the
the
-
was attacked by two men, who, first throwing something
over his head and face to muffle him, hurled him to the
ground with great violence, and then kneeling upon him,
rifled his pockets of their contents and made off. Canison
states one of the villains to havoeowrofrnellaowshwortas rsaogguend
followingfro ck, asi fmfoorr disguise. i
fromse.
the The p
violence and ill-treatnent he
encountered as to require medical assistance.—Clalmeford
Chronicle.
NOTTINGHAM GOOSE FAIR.—Our great October
fair commenced on Thursday, under unfavourable auspices,
the weather having changed to set rain, which Legan at a
very early hour in the morning, and continued though the
whole of the day. Everything being uncomfortable, few
persons ventured into the market-place, except smith as were
compelled by business. The cheese fair was not very large,
and for the best old cheese, 655. were demandel ; for new
milk, from 58s. to 60s. ; and for second quality, from 30s. to
455. Mr. Palmer, of Sandiacre, whose dairy las obtained
such deserved repute, sold 12 cwt. at 645. each .n the morn-
ing. Stilton cheese, 9d. per lb. The show if horses, in
Calah's close, was large : good horses commandd high terms,
but inferior hacks were next to unsaleable at any price. We
have seen the cattle fair (this year held on Buton Leys and
the adjoinin.x field), much larger : there were, lowever, some
very prime beasts and stirks, which sold somewhat lower.
The show 'of onions was good, and they sold at from 10d. to
ls. per pekle.—Nottiaigham Review.
Castle.ic
AdAral George
Cockburn has left town for Walmer
-

~.,~«~ _-

RELATIVE CLO
RAILWAI

PRINCIPAL CITIES A
SCOTLAND, .

SING PRICES OF
Y SHARES
TUX
D TOWNS IN ENGLAND
A.ND IRELAND.

Giadl
I

28§ p
,

14359 d
I

pl
iles

1373 pr
69s p

1,57 s ad

17;a9d1

173%

'73s p
6%

16156

4%pl

-5341