The Sun.
London, England, 1820-08-25 00:00:00

Theodore Majocci re-examined.

Mr. BROU OHAIVI had an application to make to the House;
it was that Theodore Majocci might be recalled, as be had
some important questions to put to that witness. The first
thing he wished to know was, whether lie had been at Bris-
tol at anv titue.withisi the last twelve months.
The Earl of LtsrEut,neit, should be governed by the opinion
of the Noble Lord on the Woolsack, but on this unexpected

breaklng its, he tci suggest whether it would not be
necessary that the Counsel should state the object which
he had in view. . .

The LORD CHANCELLOR staid that their LordShiPs would.
guided by-a sense of justice, how farthe•Ctionsel should he
indulged.in cross-examining witnesses. He objected to the
cross-exantiniltion being taken pitee-meal,aud wished it to be
carried nn altogether.
Mr. littounnAm was willing to pledge himself if Theodore'
Majocci wei now re-called, never to ask lynot her question
till he should open the case, and not bring biro up again He
should be satisfied with asking tint three in four, or at most'
five questions, and would state what they were to the House-
The Loan CHANC'ELLOR thought, that with such a pledge,
their Lordships ought not to refuse the application of the
Counsel.

'Theodore iWajocci was then ordered to be recalled.
The LORD-CHANCELLOR addressin Mr. Brougham)—You
will understand what the House • will allow. You will sug-
gest the questions, and some Noble Peer must put thew.
Theodore Majoeci appeared at the liar, and stated through)
th« Interpreter, that he begged a favour of their Lordships,
which was, that if they found any thing false in his evidence,
he gave then) leave to cut off his head. . •

The following questions were then suggested by Mr.
Brougham, and put by the Lord Chancellor:—
Were you at Bristol in the course of the last year or this?
—1 do not know Bristol.

Were yon at Gloucester during any part of that period ?
I know Gloucester too well.

Were you in the service of a Mr. Hyatt, at Gloucester ?
Yts.

Did you ever declare to any person that the Princess of
Wales was a most excellent woman ?---Yes; I always said the
Princess was a good woma.i.
Did you ever declare that the conduct of the Princess of
Wales was highly becoming ?—Of her conduct I always said
that she was a good woman, but that she was surrounded by

Did you ever say that the Princess of Wales was a prudent
person, and that you never observed any thing improper in
her conduct ?-1 do not remember at alt whether I said so.

Did you ever say that the Princess of Wales ever behaved
herself with propriety ?—This I never said.
Do you remember a Gentleman of the name of William
Hughes, at Gloucester or Bristol do not remember.
The LORD CHANCELLOR directed the question to he put
plainly, Do you know a person called William Hughes ?—I
may know him, lint Ido not remember the name. ..
Did you ever know a person who is a haiikei's clerk .at
Messrs. Turner's, bankers, at Gloucester ?—I don% know the
name of the banker.

.......
Do you know, or have you had any convemtion.with any
clerk of the banking house at Gloucester?—'Phis I do not
remember.

Did you ever complain to any person at Gloucester, that
Bergaini hahrkept hack part of the servants' wages in the
household of, the Princess of \Vales ?—Yes, this I remember.

To whom did you make this complaint ?—I do nut rt.:col-
lect precisely; hut I remember that Signior Hyatt asked one
why I had left the service of the Princess. I answered him so
as I have said, and aided, that after my return•from the
lung voyage, Barthulouneo Bergatni wished even to lower my
wages.

Did you ever say the same thing respecting Bergami and
your Wages to any person beside Mk. Hyatt I—l do not re-
member.
. .

I)n yon remember Mrs. Adams, Mr. Hyatt's mother ?
Yes.

Do you remember Mrs. Hughes, Mrs. Adams' house-
keeper ?—I recollect that was the woman that transacted the
business of the house, if that be her name.
Had she a son who was a clerk in a banlsing borne ?—1 do
well recollect that the son paid visits to,thc mother, but .I, do
• •
not know whether he was in any hankiug•house.
Did• you eye:r ,him your circomstauces respecting Ber-
gami and your Wages ?—I do not recollect precisely, yes or
no, wltether,tpldieins. • . •
Did you fell that young man that the Princess of Wales
was a most excellent woMaliNtat ske•Sras prisdeut, and that
you had never seen any thing improper in ker.cOoduet,?--,
!'his Ido Dot remember. - • . .

Did you ever reppent to this,young man that the Prince's
of Wales had always, as far as yoU bad seen, behaved in a
most proper manner ?..• • . •
[Here a Noble Lord suggested that Mr. BRovoliAm bad
already exceeded the number:of questions which be,had stated
he should put.—Clies of, Gu uu.]
This I do not temetuber..

Did you ever travel in a stage coach between Gloucester
and Bristol, or between Gloucester and any other place ?—I
travelied in the stage coach from Gloucester to London ; this
reireinher;

Did you ever make any journey in a stagecoach from
Gloucester to any other place than Loudon ?—Never, that 1
recollect.

Were you ever asked by any Gentleman in a stage-coach
respecting the delibitment of the Princess 'al AVallits• whilst
you were better service ?—This I do nut.reeollect. , .
• Did you` repreierit her sto 'any person' bra stage coach as
behaving heysejtvery.pradently ?-1 do notsensember haying
spoken of these atdri.
Did you represent the Princess of Waleseder any person in a:
stage coach as a much injured woman ?—This 1 do nut ie-
mealber ; ho more no than yes. , .
Have you represented, in a stage coach or elsewhere, to
any person, that you had been applied to to swear against
her Royaliligliness ?—This 1 recollect .mare• no that's.. yea.'
What I remember Of these things is, that I INVe nevel'ipoten •
of them in any carriage where I have been.: • • •
Did you repreient to any person that you hid been applied
,to, to swear against the Princess of Wales', in any other plaCe
than a stage coach.?
The witness inquired at what time the question applied?
Have you ever said that any one had applied to you to make
a deposition against the Princess of %Vales ?—I can't under-
stand what this question can signify.
ever say to any body in England that
,yon had
been asked or. App;,ird'..to, to give• all account respecting' the
Princess of %Vales upon oath ?—Ni;, not in England..
•AI r. 13 not, OHA M observed t hat the question was not as the
witness ,eetneJ to under stand' it, whether any person had ap-
plied to hint in _England tia,give evidence, 'but: whether' he
had said so to any person its this Country.
The Sour:ma-GENERAL trusted that their lalrdships
would allow him to intereose.for a moment. He apprehend-
ed that they intended to follow the course usually adopted in
Courts of Justice, and tie conceived from the, mode of exami-
natiots
J
by his Learned Friend, that it was his inters-
tiont to obtain negative .answers frotn. the avioess, in order
afterwards to hring evidence to invalidittehis testimony. Now,
it was the rule in Courts -of Justice, when a witheis was
questioned respecting some alleged conversation, to mention
to him the name of the ' party, and the place where the con-
versation was stated to have taken place.
Mr. BROUGHAM contended, that though the rule might.be
good, it was one which, in many eases, must be deviated from.
It was, in fact, more a custom than a rule. It might happen
that the name of the person. with whom the conversation had
heels held, was nut known to a witness. Would any person
its Ws senses, then, think, that there could be any use in ask-
ing him whether he recollected conversing with an individual
whom he did, not know?
'1 be SOLICITOR-GENERAL apprehended .that his Learned
Friend WiAS ignorant of all' the lutes in Cotirti,of Justice.
Mr..l3ltotionam apprehended that his Learned .Friend him-
self was not only ignorant of all rules in Courts of Justice,
but of the; 'firat of all rules,—not to interrupt an adversary's
argument till he had dosed. He also apprehended that the
rule stated by the Solicitor-General was the mereglieturn of
that officer. If the rules now promulgated were invariably
set inforce, no witness could be fixed with perjury.
Tlie Luita
CHANCELLOR observed,;that it must. be quite
obvious that an honest man might sincerely say that he bad
never held a' particular conversation, which he yet might re,
collect if the name of the person with whom he was 'typos,
ed to bave conversed was' mentioned to 'him. 'ln 'the tißne
when he sat. at Nisi Prins it was customary to hare names
mentioned, •aall he-thougliteit would also be proper' in this'
present instance...
• .
• Mr. BROUGHA:Ii had liO objeation to mention the name;
and the question was put in the folkswing-manner
Did you say to Mr. Johnson, in a stage that you had
been applied to to be a.witneso spoinst.tlig prineess.otwakii
—I
iaysear
ttnhaltheltldijungint)to know this name or this man, either
the
Did you ever say to any j.lerson-1 have been applied to to
he a witness against the Princess of Wales,--or Wirtds to that
effect ?—Never. • .
Did you ever say to Mr. Johnson in a stage coach, hate
had considerable advantages offered the if-4 would be a
witness against the Princess of %Vales, ' or words to that of
feet ?-1 lay my head there immediately, than thit,.otlef has
never been wade to me by any body.
The Lain CHANCELLOR observed, that tne'qUe46itl was
0011 Whether the otter had been made to him, but. whether he
had ever said,that,stich an offer hail been made?
The INTERPRETER iequotett the. :House.would lie ',lewd
to allow him to follow his own 'phraseology in putting the
questions in Italian to the witness, as be thought • he should
then tie better able to make hint understand them.'
Mr. Mint, otram recomthendedhim at the saute tithe to use
as possible, asthey only served
ac
il)ee.;s1:;(10.t
in) 1.11;;Ut Snvrsesptet. uns
• Mr.linou Gums—The question is not, w.bether. the diidoursc

was made in England, but if ever be stated thatt‘offer war
made any Where? - -
[Great -difficulty -and 'misunderstanding arose mit of this
question, and a confused discussion took place, in which it
was impossible to distinguish any thing slut the Couns4 re-
lating the question in somewhat different terms, the witness
answering and the Interpreters-arguing.]
Arlen-W(li theShort-hiid Writer read tjse' following
I pledge my life I never used such discourse; I never made
this discourse about an oath,-Or-On my path.
Did you ever hold this discourse in England about giving
evidence on oath against the Princess of Wales any wirete
[This question of M r.B aou Rant was also re-statedtivice us
thrice.• at least a questlini -very nearly to the same effect, but
in different words ; and it ought to be noticed, that Whenever
Counsel found it necessary to repeat a queeve, sinittar, varia-
tions took place. Another illicussion ensued.]
BRO G wAm.,--Then, my Lords, I will put the last guts-
tip!, I intend to ask.
Did you ever say to Mr. Johnson, in a stage coach, that you
had been offered a sum of money, or a situation under Gls-
viernment, for giving evidence against the Princes; of -Wales'.
any where I—lf I could nut know the name of this Jvhusua
how can I answer this ?
Did you ever say so to any one ?-.--s-(With strong gesticu-
lation) I lay my life whether this be (that this is noir -;true;
and I will answer you (turning to Mr. Brougham) no.move,
fur you ask me questions about what. I never lammed about
—what never entered into my head.
Had you ever any conversation with any body. in a stage
coach respecting her Royal Highness the Princess of Waifs
—He has never spoken about the Princess of Wales iu a dili-
gence.'
Did he ever speak about her Rayal Highness in the coarse
of a journey in England at an Idti I—He never meddled with
such discourse about the Princess of Wales.

Did you ever, in a diligence or at an „Inn,, while on a jour-
ney, say you expected a sum of money or a place under Go-
vernment for giving.. testimony against her Royal Highness
—(With emphasis.)—Never, ncetr. •
How long was he in England the first time lie came over ?-
-One night.
The LORD CHANCELLOR,—The question is; alien he livid
with Mr. Hyatt, of Gloucester?—He does not remember, as
he has not his book in which the time is marked.
(By Counsel)—How many•months ?--He cannot answer, as
he has not his book he put it down in.

RE-EXAMINATION.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL—(by way of re.examination).—t.
Did. lie cone from Vienna.to this country with Mr. Hyatt
Mr;"Hyatt brought me hers.
At whose expense did he travel i—Mr. Hyatt paid Say fare.
Mr. BROUGHAM thanked. their Lordships for the indulgende
they had shown in allowing this witness to be recalled.
Lord ELLENROROUOII wished to put a question.
When the witness said the Princess- of Wales was a bone
donna (or prudent woman,) did. he refer to her mural con-
duct as a woman, or to her conduct towards him as a mis-
tress ?—(After some discussion.)--He always spoke of her as
a bona donna, for if he had spoken of her as a woman of bad
conduct, (cattiea dOnna seemed to be the phrase,) they would"
have knocked him down, or quarrelled with him.
Much discussion ensued as to the strict 'translation of thlt-
latterAvords, in which Lords fßrrenville,Morten, and Ellentm-
rough participated.
Mr. BROUGHAM addressed their Lordships, and said, that
by the questions which' he: had put, respecting the offer
of a place under Government,- -lye did not mean to-impute
that any one had everinade such an offer to the witness.
Lord ELLENBottouou observed; that it was to elicit accu•
racy that ha had • put the question,7•as the answer had net
seemed to be correctly,inteipreted. .
The Marchese, Spinetto apologised, and said that in thi4
difficult part of the examination he bad requested the co-
operation of Mr. Cohen, the interpreter for the defence, and
it was agreeable to his wish that he bad rendered the answer..
as he did.
It was observed; however, that it did dot appear the wit-
ness bud used the doubtful words at all ; and the matter -
dropped. ~
It wanted now about twenty minutes to fire, and Loyd
LiveaPoot; etpressrd an opinion that their Lordships might
now adjourn without calling in another witness; but there
was a cry of go on, and
. . .
Francisco Virollo, or Biroilo, was called in and sworn.
Examined by Mr. PARK. - •
Of what country is the witness ?—A Piedmontese. - •
• Where-were you employed, when applied to to be brought
here?—ln the service of the Marchese.

Were you at any time in the service of the Princess of
Wales ?—Yes.
• An what capacity ?—As cook.
•
In what year di4 you enter into her Royal Highness's arr.,
vice?—When the Princess came from Venice. He does not
remember the year:

How long did he continue in her Royal Highness's service?
—About two years, or two years and a kalf.
Was he engaged fur this service by .Pergariii ?—Yes.
• Did lie know Berganii before ?,—Yes, he did.
,When be 'first knew Bergami, what was he ?—He was .
the same service with me.

\Vas that in'the sertice of General Pino ?—lt was.
In what capacity did Bergami act alien in the service of Lv•
General Piro?—He acted as a valet, for he came to the,
kitchen to fetch the dishes to wait at table. He afterwards
took the situation of courier.'
How lung were You together with Bergami in Genii*
Pino's service?-1 was in Genera) Pino'a service]. Berge*.
was in the service of the Comtessa. • . •
• ••
How long did you know him when•he was in the, service-of
the Countess?---He. cannot tell; because he went out ot the
service of General Pino, and Bergaiiii.yemained as courier.
How long•was Bereami lathe service of the Countess helb4
the wituesslefethe Geberal ?—"As before.
HOw long were you in the service of General Pin)?—Three
years at different times.—(The witness specified them.)
Was .Bergami in "the iervice •of the. Countess at theS7
times ?—Yes.
. -
For bow many years before witness entered the 'service?of
the Princess of Wales had he known Bergatui?-1 did mit
see him before I knew hint ithahe itervice of Gets. Pino.

How long before the witness entered the service. of the
Princess of Wales ?-11e does not- linow.
From, what place was he ,talten into the service of her
Royal ilighness.?7—When she came from,,V.enice and went
somewhere opposite the Casa Boromeo the first time.
Wete you with her. Royal Highness at the VillaVillani?'l,-
He was.:
Was he at the Villa d'Este was.`
Dlid he accompany her .Royal Highness in her voyage to
Greecei—He • • ,
Did be act as cook on that voyage ?—He did, except when
on board the two ships, the Leviathan and clorinde, where
be did not act as cook.
Did be return with her Royal Highness from Greece to
nab; ?—I before' I acted as cook on board the polacea.
Watt he at Bar-opal—Yes. • ' .

Atwhat place did he leave the service•.uf the Princess?—
.
At Parana. • •

- -,
Elow came you to leave the isertice oilier Royal Highness ?"
~
—Because it was Bergamit4 bcother who persecuted me, and . •
I cupid nut stand the ~
labour.
- - ,- .. ..
. ... ~
What does: ;use mean by that-,h,e could not stand the la, -1 ' .
hour 2--Because there. was•too much labour. I
Before they went to. PalestihsOrs what•part pf the, potacca
did the Princess sleep?--.Sometimes on necli,,and eopettarte„,
under the deck. _ ....
What was the usual place tit* ' 3.4 1-1' whet r . igbness slept;
'
`in iioing front 'Jaffa to Ita.1)0:43101,' ,„ lea)e deck .:
cept whetstid'hinded, for' weintdlfi, ; r _bstio.ruw.O.A
..
Does he- know whe'eu.Sergis4tV . en tkiiroyage front
Jaffa to Italy ?—W hen ,ins boartt- be-saW lijit Oiler the tent'
inthe ereiiiiikt,'Aitil,theri .it elialett...liete,lpai the Princess, •
, and here.liergarni.oopliitiq.) -•:3 . U'll",-•' , ' - 5t
Di'd he eve.t3ettAergAlp,i in ktie isiorthug Aint.out of-the
=nt
' tent ?,-Sornetimes,.hist. in the morlitig vprfil;‘,..i -- ~
• /1t itili:it o'clock ..?..;;Ab. Abut a certain !iota lie.icalle `oaf, (fur
a piirpose which-iklicair
....rliids us to paitienlitrlzt.)
Ai what time in the;ntorni"nellitrtie.liiii.erdlteishjuii.twaorae-
tioits early., itiaefiilles later; he wentio".-titit.,l4l,4betnntuil
potO.toes for the fauri-131....' r' - • , --","-• , • - • -`,...,
_. Where was the kitchen 1--Worler'ttuz imaitt near the hoit.it*.
~
sprft. ' • ~ • ‘.- ~;. ...,,..„11.....iiiiiiiikk
.Was the terit,,,74%al's rlktre....,-,-.-tnOlnettales V)—t
Whti.tput..dOwn.at ttight:A-4%"was.,_. , .
s.--.....-
. lii. what way wits it fastelied-dOwn ?..-41it'tent was covered
~
~.. .
with seecral things, .and all closed... . '
Gould lie see wlio was in it"?—l could not: 1 yeas' attending
my!kitchen. •In going.atiptit, I. aute,i4Witkiiiretteld. . •
.Did he ever see ii tight.inAhc.fent„„a..t iotft.,4 w14P.,i.t,.. Tt444,
chisvd4l.LNuice I haelyseier.te pittlitscar the tent. •. . ;,,i ,
: Ito yon know. who put. it, mitt ,pf. the-tent ?,-..„t4vc „„ii__.k..,
know itl: I Was in• nit' 4irsitnitld iliti it pat' inti.:;', . ,-.:117q-Ilt
Does he know ylio riceived -It ?—Theod ore: 444 $44..^. '-'ice
r
wh Bep ergaini came out of the tent in the triorningi, 1 i
10;171,..
WaS'ileArebStrti -41.iNi•govrii which. Mt- had , Matte in iktg cC......i
• ••• .: : t, • .:
-• ....., t rob. .... ,
i.'..*?' :.3*- ..:,i`
Gi'll:h"i'.iC't!'ulltisScikk..i—Ailj otir.iled.. • 1.
•
.. , . . . .

,-1

LONDON JOURNALS.

TDAILI'EXTILICTS,J

FROM TIIE MORNING PAPERS.

[Morning Post.]
'TRIAL OF THE QUEEN.—The third Witness ,
:against her Majesty, the Captain of a Polacca,•
in -which the celebrated voyage was performed
( Vincenzo Gziergilo), was examined yesterday.
Ills testimony, it *ill be seen, was very strong ;
infinitely more so than that of the Mate of the
'vessel, who was examined on the preceding day;
tut we cannot bring `ourselves to offer any re-
'marks upon so disgusting a subject. Theodore
.Majocci was again called for the defence, and
.nuderwcnt a farther examination, ill conse-
quence, we understand, of an uncommonly iano-
rant letter received by Alderman Wood from
loncester. The questions put to him were,
:whether he had stated to a Mr.
J ohnson, or any one, that he was on his way to
•glve evidence againsf the Queen, and that he ex-
'rected the result of his deposing against her
-.would be very advantageous to him. To every
question on this point; the :witness positively af-
tivmed that he had never .wade nny such statement;
that he had never held any discourse with any
one on the subject ; and, finally, that he did not
.kuow any person of that name. On appearing
at the Bar, Theodore addressed their Lordships
and said, " that if they found any thing false in
his evidence, he gave them leave ito cut off his
head." Mr. Brougham very. candidly
.stated to
.their Lordships, that, the course he- had
taken, he did not mean to imply that any place
was ever offered to Majocci by any one.

Chron.icle.l
We -concelie we discharge our duty to the
public in giving therm as fair and full an account
as we an of the proceedings- each .day •in the
louse of Lords, and in connuonting on that evi-
dence, or .pronouncing any 'opinion' in the 'present
.stage of these proceedings, we conceive we should
not be doing our duty. it would have been bet-
ter, no doubt, that
,the proceedings had never
commenced ; and if ever, they. should come to a
close, apd many suppose they never will, the ob-
jections to the consequences which it is proposed
they should have, still remain. But these are
considerations distinct from.o that of her Majesty's
Ntving,or not having committed the acts imputed
to her. This can only ,be determined by evi-
C.l,ence. ;land till, the whole of that Ovideuce be
heard,, it is, impossible to for;][-Ca correct opinion
respecting the part before the public. We may
have our own suspicions and our readers no
doubt have their suspiciOns;- but it is hardly fair
to give suspicions for certainties. 'lt is the less
necessary to point the attention of the public to
the particular features of this evidence, as there
never was a case watched with so intense an.in.
West, and of .which every gradation of proo
was so distinctly marked.

~ ?i~

[New Times.i .•
' The House of Lords has shown its strict ad-
herence to the prineiples of justice by providing
, that its ptivileges shall interpose no bar, to, the
prosecution of any witnesses who may commit
perjory, in the course of,the pnelitpe; investigation.
straies us, -but we submit 4119 i idea conside-
, Tation with great diftidencert*t soma similar
t.,Rrecaution,might be taken by thefijouse of Com-
.-IitIODS. When the Bill is. brought down thither,
.oe-witnesses, whom it may be necessary to re-
examine,,will speak without ,the restraint of an
oath--because. the House of Commons .has not
Iwually, authority to administer• oaths—but a short
cticui,g.ht either. give them that power for the
fpp.,r4l oprtiasion, eq., (what, would perhaps be bet-
it Jpight enact that persons proved to have
given false testimony before the 'House on any
point material to, the issue of the Queen's guilt
or innocence, should be pnnisked as if they. had
„„ornmitted perjury. „ ,

:;/, itt c•
MALL LOTTERY—GREAT PRIZES—FE W TICKETS—
' i‘.IANY CAPITALS—ALL STERL)NG MONEY—ALL
• N lirKr MIN ESD AY . • •
•
THEATRICAL REGIS,TER,.
Perliirtard Litst Night.
'f EA/ RS ROYAL, Dittlftr. LA-NE.-4 New Way to Pay OW
Debt : Sir Giles Qvurfeach, Mr. Kean. After which, Fur-
tun.-'$ •
TnEATVE: R-dri;AZ,tilvitstiiittiiiii'zi.Pilteons sent Citiii•C 'After
rhich. SylveAtt'r pliggrrwtrti? - :To -which. was,•,adderl,•Ei•
change, nu Robbery.
'I t: ItnfAL, ItNtiLlSif Oir.RA HotisE.—Free and Eacy.
After winch, Patent Seasong. To which was added, 'lire
I /rt"l'irN(4 1..1 .1: •.;t:
'PRICE OF STOCKS
Trrrs 'DAY AT ONE OCEOCi:
,Bank StOcl; • t 920 Rank. Lung. . 'Meth
pertitfitcAted.' 10464 per Cimt. Ann:
6 twt Cent. Gi)lW Gil 88 India Stock 2151.:216
51 per Cent. • • 77 India Bonds 20t. 211S."pr.
4_per Gedts . . 87 Ex. Bills, qd ..2i. ss. pr.
6 per Ct.,:Navy Ann.,,... 104 I Cons. forfAcoou ,

•

MAILS.
Attftrryl.--1 Dt11:1111, 1 Waterford, I'France.
Drill--1 Guernsey and Jersev, I'Hullend, 2 Gottenburglt,
t.Lisbon.
lIIGFI WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW.
Iklor-ine. 45 miwit,s after 3.--Erenitig, I nitiimte ;Mut. 4.

THE SUN:

SOLE.M FiLSCril AUDrAT?

A

LONDON

FRIDAY '; AUGUS7 25, 1820.

ME QUEEN.

HOUSE OF IDIMS-THIS DAY.

The LORD CHANCELLOR this morning came
into the House a few minutes before ten o'clock,
after which prayers were as usual read by the
'Lord Bishop of LAsnArz.--Previous to the roll
Lefeg dined over,
Lord ELLENBOROUGLI said, that he had now
to Couplain of the improper use which bad been

•

made of the 'name of Lord Stewart 'by a rublie
Journal. The Noble Lord was stated to have seen

i\lajocci at Vienna, and that Majocci was enter-
tained for six months at his Lordship's house.
How such a base and gross misrepresentation
could have been possibly contrived, he did not
know, because it was well known, that at the
very time alluded to, Lord Stewart was in Lon-
don on a particular business, namely, to have his
marriage with Lady Emily Vane Tempest fully
arranged and accomplished. Besides, Majocci
was in the service of the Marquess Odescalchi.
He (Lord Ellenborough) did not mean to, by any
means, insinuate, that it was not the duty of a pub-

lie servant abroad to render every possible service
which mi.ght bo of benefit to the Government of

the Country, but he must say that in this in-
stance an insinuation had been thrown out on the
character of Lord Stewart,'which was as false as

it was base.—(Hear, hear !)--He had felt it his
duty to make these observations, as the falsity of

the charge was too obvious to be passed over.
On the roll being called over, at apology was
offered for Lord SONDES, on the ground of

,ndisposition.
Lord LIVERPOOL contended, that it would. be

most impfoper to permit occasional indisposition
to be an apology during the investigation of this
most important and vitally interesting question.
No such excuse was indeed tenable, considering
that the evidence was published every day, and
could therefore be furnished to every one of
their Lordships._
Lord GnEY deprecated in the strongest terms,
the very idea of' compelling any one of 'their

Lordship, to vote on the first question.
Lords &pox and ERMINE agreed in the opi-
nion of Earl Grey, and considered such compul-
sion to be totally uncalled for. At a quarter past
ten, the Counsel were called in, when
Mr. Lui and the ATTORNEY-GENERAL
severally complained of some gross misrepre-
sentations in The Times newspaper.
Mr. BROUGHAM particularly 'Complained' of - a
misrepresentation respecting the cross-examina-
tion of Theodore Majocci. in the discharge of
that important dtity which lie owed to his Illus.-

&lout Client, and he might also add, to the Pub-
lic, he had •felt it his bounden duty to call back
that witness, and to put to him several questions.
In a case of such importance, it was peculiarly
desirableA since publicity had been given to the
proceedings, to have a correct statement go forth
to the world, and therefOre the slightest misre-
presentation was much ..to be. deprecated, consi-
dering the, effect it:might, have •on the public
mind; already too much agitated.—(llear, hear,
hear !)
The Earl of LAUDERDALE also complained; of
the misrepresentations ,Which the Public Press
daily issued, and Whichtended in no inconsiderable
degree to excite a general ferment. He more par-
ticularlyalluded to a publication in a cheap form,
entitled " A Peep at the Peers," and strongly
condemned the falsehoods which that contained.
It reflected in the strongest terms on hii
character, representing himself and relations to
be pensioners of Government, a thing which
was too well known to be false to require any
refutation.

The LORD CIiAI,idELLOII
,alsO "condemned the
publication of such falsehoocis. Ue had also
his share of ,abuse in :the' publication al-

hided to—but he suggested Whether. it might
not be proper at present .to drop. any comment
on the Public Press. The better, may would,
perhaps, be to -.make 'these coMplaintS the sub-
ject
of investigation at a future .perioiL
: Francisco Boriado was again called in and
examined.—Does not remember any- thing parti-
cular in' the' cenduct of the PriocesS at Eplie-
,
sus or Scala Nova:. Remembers nothing in
this case, because . it was his ...;ditty-,•to
. -
take Care 'of-the dinner, or f to look after the
luggage. ;. 4as seen the Princess and Bergamito-
gether at Villa and at the Villa D'.Este'
(To this question Dr. Lushington objected, but
the objection was overruled.) The Princess and
Bergami walked arm in arm. Has..seen them
together in the kitcken. Has seen them alone,
and a Dame d'Honneur with them. The Countess
Oldi
.was •not there. The Princess cut some
meat, and gave Bergami generally some of it
'first. ' Savi..Malioniet-:perform his tricks, which
seemed mtich to amuse, the Princess, who was at
the window: At Turin saw Bergami's bed one
day quite untouched. Was going to the room of
the Darne d'llonneur when this was the case ;
saw Bergami come out of the Princess's room ;
Bergami scolded him very much ; was at the
Baths at Barona ; no gentry were there, and
only persons of the lowest rank.
Cross-examined by Mr. 13noucitAii:
Was examined at Milan. Was told-there that
he must come to England. Was examined by an

Advocate there in presence of Col. Was I
sent for by Colonel Brown. His wages at
Milan were a Eyre per day. lie was conaforta-
ble. Ile had perquisites, and a Napoleon a
quarter, besides diet and clothes. Baron Bergarni
examined the accounts of the house. Expects
his master will pay the, livre to his daughter
though he has not beard from her.
By the Marquis of Lussnows.—Mahomet
played the same tricks beforo the servants.
By Lord LAUDEIID4LE-13ergami in scolding
him said," What brings you here, and how dare

yonropen the doer."
Here the examination concluded—and-Captain
PECHELL was then called in. His examination
was going on when our Reporter left the House,
at half-past one o'clock.

It must tie admitted that; whatever may be the
result of the present lamentable Investigation in
the House of Lords, no blame can be attached
to Government for bringing it forward. . THE
QUEEN had such oilers to induce her to remain
abroad as would probably have satisfied her, if
she had not been treacherously tempted, not by
the mere vanity of her Advisers, but by interested
machinations, as gross as any stock; jobbing trans-
action on 'record.---The only Conspiracy, that we
have heard; is not, as The Old 'Times has
averred, a Conspiracy on the part of Government
to effect her. destruction, bit a Conspiracy to
render her .the dupe of pecuniary artifices,
which, according to:report, have been successful
to a vast amount. There is something so base in

these schemes that we trust they will be explored
to the bottoin. The guilt or innocence of Tut
QuEEN were evidently matters of indifference
with those atrocious speculators to whom she fell
a victim on this melancholy occasion. But when
we say she fell a victim, we presume not to offer
any conjectures on her innocence or guilt, but
merely to slim how far she has been renderedd-a
dupe by the base corruption,-of those by Ay:lose
counsel she was ensnared. The vile Pect44iaxy
plots by which she was seduced back, to this
Country, having been as successful as could be
expected, ivere then combined with vanity, and
these arts- were put In pra.btice to delude the
multitude as much as Tux QUEEN--,perhaps for
the double purpose of coverinst the -original ma-
,
'chination under the parade of pseudo.popularity.

We have been desired by many of,our Readers
to include the w'hole of what The Old Times
says every day on the subject of the awful Trial
now on foot among our Daily Extracts from the
London Journals, as quite surncient to expose
and degrade its Character in the eyes of man-
kind. We do not,'however` deefit it necessary to
load our Paper with such 'Avia-e'd trash. That
Paper has more than insinuated that Ministers
have entered into a Conspificy to ruin TUE QUEEN.

If Alinisters can contentedly acquiesce in sue!)
,a charge, all people will be surprized at their
negligence under so heavy an imputation. We
shall merely select passages from the Paper in
question, and leave the Public to decide on its
conduct, particularly in its treatment of, the Wit-
nesses. This day The Old Times says, " We be-
lieve we may DOW say this most atrocious Conspi-
racy against the QUEEN of ENGLAND has, like that
of 1806, received its death-blow by the detections
and exatninationS'of yesterday." It is to be ob-
. served' that only four witnesses have been 4 x-
&mined, and that they are agreed in importan de-
,
tails,yet The Times already decides ou the whole
case!! It says also—" We have no hesitation
whatever in saying, that. if the Ministers and
Law Qicers of the Crown, knew of; and ac-
quiescqd iii, Majocti4s concealments, they ought
to be impeached forthwith as reading members in
tliWcolaspiracy ; for let it- be -recollected, that
her not "Ottly Queen Consort, but
also at;no Nervy great distance‘ili the: direct line
'of sucessiotr."---We hope the Ministers and
.Law Officers Orthe , Crown will'uot be wanting
n. zeal tolexempt -themselves .from the danger
with which they-are thus menaced by The Times,
and to acquiEthOnselt:es in the eyes of mankind.
Speaking of- the Italian. witnesses,. it says, " I f
any thing cautd bind creatures ,of this descrip-
tion." The, gate .of the i-esset fiein Messina is
styled a " shabby Italian." Nowouppose the
witnesses 'brought in-favour of the QUEEN should
be Italians, what will The Time say :the truth
is, that it is bewildered in its own malignity, and
does not foresee the dilemma•in which it will in-
volve itself.

The Marquess of ANGLF.SEY is asked this day,
by the most illiberal, scurrilous, and factious
Journal of the Metropolis,'" 'How did he come
by his present wife ;'." We are unwilling to
follow so liespiCable,an example, or wanton ma-
levolence, but we may ask if there is not an Op-
position Veer who obtained his in a- similar
manner, and if 'that wife has been as'unexcep-
tionable in her conduct since her second union as
the Marquess's'consort has during her's ?--)Ve
might also ask which of,the.husbands bas.deriVed
most pecuniary advantage by the matrimonial
transfer?

SECOND EDITION.

SUN-OFFICE, Half-Pagt Four.

—is.—
HOUSE OF LORDS.—(TH IS E _VENING)

After the examination of Captain PEctiELD

and Captain BRIGGS, on board whose vessels

he . PRINCESS and her suite were, and where
he arrangements previously made, were a'

ered at the desire of the PRINCESS, in order to

place BERGAMI in a room near her own bed•

chamber; and the examination of another Wit'

ness, a German woman was called, who was 3

servant at the Inn at Carlstube, where the Pitt N.

CESS, BEIIGAMI, and her Suite were lodged. This

woman, on going into a bed-room, saw the Pal,N-
CESS and BERGAMI in the bed, the former partlf.

undressed, having his arm round the.PßlNcEss'

neck. On the Witness entering the room, the

PRINCESS rose up, and BERG HMl's arm drop'
ped from her neck. An objection by tile!

ishop of PETERSBOROUGH, was taken, and the

Earl of IroprrouN, to the mode of interpret',

ing this answer by the German Interpreter,
showing , that he did not sufileiently understaoit:

';i7,nglish, and after some discussion it was agree(/'
.hat another Interpreter should be procured. 111

the mean time, the evidence & this witness ll-
suspended, and the ATTORNEY-GENERAL deClii'

in; to call another witness, while the former -wit'
ness was under examination. he House ads'

ourned at four o'clock till to-marrow at ten•

The,QUEEN qui4e4.the Howe in some

tion on the answer -above meDtioned7/Ixl4
given by the German woman., Her IIAJF.4

retired to her apartment, and went au-ay s

- ,- • •
ime before four, to the disappointment cP

great number of pthons, who were flocking den

o the Ilouse till five, in the expectation of ser

ng Her.

The QUEEN in her progress along Parliament'
street, was very faintly cheered, and the nurnbeC
of her followers was much less than usual.