The Sun.
London, England, 1827-04-26 00:00:00

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT.

INJUNCTIONS.
Mr. SWANSTERN having applied this morning for
4:; ex-parte injunction to restrain certain members
the a Partnership from interfering in anyway. with
d Partnership concerns, on the grounds of miscon-
duct on their part,
The VICE-CIiANCELLoR observed, that the ut-
910st he could do in this case was to allow the plain-
tiff to give notice of his motion for a future day; and
etven this, said his Honour, I do with great reluc-
re. An idea appears to have gone abroad, that
Court has jurisdiction to restrain the commis-
Itn of every wrong, no matter of what description.
is only where the wrong would be irreparable,
that this Court can interfere; and God forbid that
tjurisdiction should be carried to greater lengths.
u maY give notice for Saturday.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
39IICICWORTH V. WALKER-
Mr. SCARLETT stated that this was an action
brought upon a bill of exchange for 101. accepted by
the defendant, drawn by a person named Meares,
and indorsed by him and a Mr. Anderson to the
Plaintiff.

It appeared in evidence that the defendant being
indebted to Meares, accepted the bill, which was
afterwards paid over to the house of Coombe, Dela-
field, and Co. Soon after the bill was so paid over,
,Ltd three days before it fell due, Walker paid
_Meares the 10/. with the understanding that he was
Dhave the bill taken out of the hands of Coombe,
elafield, and Co. and delivered up to him. It ap-
vared) however, that Meares had not done as Mr.
alker expected, and when the bill became due, it
was presented and dishonoured. Subsequently Mr.
Anderson advanc2,l money to Meares, which ena-
bled
him to take up the bill, and the bill having
Come into Anderson's hands he indorsed it to the
Plaintiff.
Mr. REILLY contended that the bill being taken
11. P after it was due, the plaintiff could have no more
tight to sue upon it than Meares had, who, having
en paid, could not maintain an action.
"'he Court having concurred in this view of the
ease) the plaintiff was nonsuited.

T, SIKEITH V. ARCHER, THE ELDER.
is all was an action brought by the plaintiff, who
of ll "toy public and scrivener, to recover a sum
It for work and labour done.
4ddr aPPeared, that the plaintiff's brother paid his
"8 to the defendant's daughter, whilst he was
4"in h' • g articles to a scrivener and notary public,
a'urnival's Inn, and that he had transacted, and
lvtiti! Paid for a considerable portion of the business,
I,lth the plaintiff now charged against the defendant.
" Plaintiff was introduced to the defendant by the
40ther to do some business for him whilst the bro-
er ',resin, and had been paid for the business done
4t
that time. It aeared that besides the circum-
ll ee Dthat some of pp
the items now charged were paid
r
the brother, the plaintiff had inserted two items
fader false dates. The business to which they re-
i!rred having been executed before he received his
tense, as a scrivener.
Linder these circumstances the plaintiff's Counsel
to
4lented to a nonsuit.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
BAINBRIDGE v. BARLOw.
ta: n
rhis was an action for recovery of the loss sus-
'fledconsequence of the breach of a contract for
tirtlber.
lh the spring, 1825, the defendant engaged to fur-
-1411 to the plaintiff a cargo of Canada timber, of a 4merchantable.quality. The cargo accordingly
n..—
rea in the Commercial Docks in July, 1826; but
tame part of it was not of a good quality. With
e-01/Paet to
_the extent of the badness of it, and the
415aquent loss, there was a great difference of opinion
47ng the witnesses. Two gentlem en who surveyed the
e_rge for the plaintiff, gave it as their opinion that a
Inaiderable portion of it was entirely rotten, some
cIPPy, and coarse, and by no means good mer-
uantable timber, and estimated the loss upon the
Ole
tie ,at 3661., while another of the plaintiff's wit-
iassea, considered the loss would only be 177/. 12s.
itil,• On the other hand, three of the defendant's
tireZsaca, who were timber brokers, thought the
u
though pon the whole, a good. merchantable cargo,
lots they admitted there might be some trifling
0f Which were not entirely unobjectionable. One
hl.:the.to considered some lots marked rotten by the
- all survers, as the best part of the cargo,
,t 1 could only make an allowance of 141. for the
Iv i,a loss, while another would allow 401.
The CHIEF JUSTICE expressed his astonishment
contradictory evidence of the witnesses; and
rl,llle
the -capitulating and commenting upon it, left
zuestiter on entirely in the bands of the Jury.
for tit t f
ntiff.__ew minutes' deliberation, the Jury found
e plaiDamages, 1911.
TH

PARLIAMENTARY PAPERS.
BANK OF ENGLAND.
I."AN ACCOUNT of Mossy paid or payable at the BANE of
ENGLAND for the MANAGEMENT of the PUBLIC DEBT,
in the year, 1826 ; together with an Account of all
Allowances made by the Public to the Bank, or charged
by the Bank against the Public, for transacting any
Public Service in the year 1826 ; describing the nature
of the Service, and the Amount charged thereon in the
said Year, and including the sum of 4,0001., under the
denominatien of House Money or House Expenses, and
also the sum of 1,899/. 3.. 5d., under the denomina-
tion of Charges of Management on South Sea Stock ;
and stating the Aggregate Amount of the whole.
Charge for management of the unredeemed
Public Debt, for one year ending the
sth April, 1827, being the annual pe-
riod at which the accounts are made
up as directed by the Act 48 Geo. 3,
c. 4 £249,777 8 84
Ditto, ditto, for one year ending ditto,
on sundry Annuities transferred to the
Commissioners for the reduction of
the National Debt, for the purchase
of Life Annuities, per Act 48 Geo. S
and subsequent Acts 2,671 1 44
Ditto for receiving Contributions towards
funding 8,000,0001. of Exchequer
Bills, for the service of the year 1826,
at the rate of 4001. per million 3,200 0 0
Charges of Management, being part of
an entire yearly Fund of 100,0001.
enjoyed by the Governor and Company
of the Bank of England, originally by
thee. Act of the sth and 6th of William
and Mary, c. 20, confirmed to the
said Governor and Company by seve-
ral subsequent Acts ; and lastly, by
the Act of the 39th and 40th Geo. 3.
c. 28, as per return made to the Hon.
House of Commons, on June 21, 1816
Ditto, ditto, on 4,000,000/. South Sea
Stock, purchased by the Governor
and Company of the Bank of England,
of the South Sea Company, and trans-
ferred by them to the said Governor
and Company, in pursuance of the
Act of the Bth Geo. 1. c. 21, and
which charges of management were
assigned by the said South Sea Coin '
pany to the said Governor and Com-
pany, out of a sum of 9,397/. 9s. 6d.
per annum, then paid by the public to
the said South Sea Company for
charges of management on their funds;
as per return made to the Hon. House
of Commons, on June 21, 1816..

4,000

1,898

£261,546 13 6
H. HASE, Chief Cashier.
2. An ACCOUNT of the TOTAL AMOUNT of all BALANCES
of PUBLIC MONEY in the hands of the BANE, for the
year 1826 ; stating the Average Amount in each fif-
teen days.
Total £101,142,513
Average
WM. DAWES, Accountant-General.
3. An ACCOUNT of the AMOUNT of ADVANCES made by
the BANK of ENGLAND to GOVERNMENT on Exchequer
Bills, and all other Securities, including Exchequer
Bills, Deficiency Bills, Navy Bills, Victualling Bills,
&c. on August 26, 1826, and February 26, 1527.