The Sun.
London, England, 1820-06-20 00:00:00

, . ,
ciitekerib ircfe O'rodid icas- Englari'd in
• •
ailaanited Her Nlajesty's La* Qfcai • th,tt they
thl venture tb ttsstire than, that this Difficulty would nut

he Qleen arrived in England corittarY to The King's
wishes ai.d Representations, but were Her Majeity now to
de..i:re to pass to the Continent, whether to a ,Port in the
~.ltatinel, or it it should more accord with Her Majesty's
Views, to proceed at Once to the Nlediterkanean; a king's
Yacht in the one instance; or a'Ship of War in the other,
might be mitered to.couvey Hcr Majesty.
After reeeiviog these explanations, The Qiieen'S Law Of-
ficers recurred to the Points before touched tiptili; vii. the
inserting the Queen's Name in the Liturgy, or the devising
something in the Nature of an Equivalent, and intimated
their conviction that her Majesty would feel it ne2:essary to
press ode or both ut those objects, or some other of
nature and tendency.
They then asked whether a Residence in one of the Royal
Palaces would he secured to Her Majesty while in tido
Country, and observed that Her Majesty had never been de-
prived of tier Apartments in Kensington Palace until She
voluntarily gave thew up fur the accommodattun of the late
Duke of Kent.

It was replied; that the King's Servants had no instructions
on this point. They, however, observed, that they believed
the Apartments a hid) Her Majesty formerly occupied, when
Princess of lValeS, Were at present actually in the possession
of the, Dochesi Of Kent; and that they considered that this
point had been already disposed of, by supplying► to Her Ma-
jr.ty the funds which were necessary to furnish Her Majesty
with a suitable Hesridenee.

Her Majesty's Law Olticeri then inquired, Whether,'suppos-
ing an Arrangement made, the lc of winding up the Tran-
saction, and withsira«•iug the information referred to Parlia-
ment had been considered, and whether the King's Servants
saw ar•y Objection), in the present Instance; to tile Houses of
.Parliament expressing, by suitable Addresses both to the.
Kill 4 and Queen, their grateful ThanLs fur their Majesties
haviog acquiesced in an Ai ratigement, by whitill Parliament
had been saved the painful duty of so delicate and difficult a
proceeding.

The kiog's Servants acknowledged this Point had not been
considered, but reserved to themselves to report the Observa-
tions made thereupon to then Colleagues.
It was then agreed that, upon every view of Duty and Pro-
ihe finatDeeision should not he protiaeted beyond
Monday, to which day it should be proposed that the Proceed-
ings on the King's Message in the House of Commons should
he adjourned, on a distinct Explanation to this effect; and
that a Conference should take place to-more ow, in. order to
bring the business to a,Conelusion, and tom range, by wutua
euusent, the- rrutueols of Conference.
(Sigurd)

(No. 111.)

WELLINGTON,
CAS TLEREAGH,
H. BitOlAiliAg,
T. DE:SNI AN.

Paorocot, of the Third Conference, held at the Foreign

Office, June 17, 1820-
The Conference was opened by Her Majesty's Law Officers
intimating, that, adverting to what had passed in the pre-
ceding Conference, they had nothing to propose, but to pro-
ceed to the Adjustment of the Protocol.

The King's Servants stating, that, before,they'entered into
this Business of arranging the Protocol, they thought it their
Duty to advert to the points discussed in the preceding Con-
ference, upon which no explicit opinion had been expressed
by them on the part of His Majesty s Government; they then
declared, that they were authorised to inform the Queen's
Law Officers, that, in the Event. of Her Majesty's going to
the Continent, a Yacht or Ship at War, would be provided for
the Conveyance of Her Majesty, either to a Port in the
Channel or to a Port in the Mediterranean, as Her Majesty
might prefer.

That' ever`• personal Attention and Respect would be paid
by The King's Servants abload to Her Majesty. and every en-
deavour made by them to protect Her Majesty against any
po.sible Inconvenience, whether in Her Travels or residing
on tiniContinent,—with the understood Reserve, however, of
public Reception.by The King's Ministers abroad, and In.
truduction at Foreign Courts.
It was further stated by The King's Servants, that having
weighed the Suggestion communicated by The Queen's Law
Officers in the preceding Conference, they were now prepar-
ed to declare, that they saw no difficulty (if the terms in
which the same were to be conveyed were properly guarded)
to a Proposition being made to both Horses, fur expressing by
address to The Queen as well as to the King, their gratefnl
Acknowledgments fur the facilities which Their Majesties
might have respectively afforded, towards the accomplishment
of an Arrangement by which Pathament had beets saved the
necessity of so painful a discussion.
These observations not appearing to make any material
Difference in the Views taken by Her Majesty's Law Oticers
of the Result of the Conferences, it was agreed to proceed in
the Arrangement of the Protocols.

Before however the Protocol was discussed, The King's
Servants desired distinctly to know from Her Nia
jjesty's.Law
Officers, whether the introduction of the Queen $ Name in
the Liturgy, and Her Majesty's introduction at Foreign
Courts, were either of them a condition sine gud non of an
Ariangement on the part of he Queen ;to which it was
replied, that either the introduction of Her Majesty's Name
in the Liturgy, or a❑ Loolivalent , which would hare the effect
of protecting Her MRjesty against the unfavourable Inference
to which Her Majesty might be liable in leaving the country
under the Circumstances in which Her Majesty was placed,
was a line qua non. The Queen could not be advised volun-
tarily to consent to any Arrangement which was not satisfac-
tory to Her Majesty's own feelings, however Iler Majesty,
with a view to meet the understood wishes of Parliament, had
felt it her duty to propose to leave the whole Question to an
Arbitration.

No Proposition on the part of Her Majesty, other than
thuse already adverted to, was brought forward.
(Signed; WELLINGTON.
'CASTLEktEAGHs
H. BROUGHAM.
T. DENMAN.

(No. IV.)
PROTOCOL of the Fourth Conferemee, held at St. James-
Square, lath June lain.
Before proceeding to finial' She discussion of the Protocols,
it was suggested, on the part of the King's Servants, if pos-
sible to meet the Queen's wishes, and in order the better to
assure to Her Majesty every suitable Respect and Attention
wAhin the particular State in which She might think fit to
establish Her residence (the Milanese or the Roman States
having been previously suggested by Her Majesty's Law. Off-
icers, as the Alternative within Her Majesty's Contemplation)
that the King would cause Official Notification to be made of
Her Majesty's Legal Character as Queen, to the Gore' ument
of such state.—,-That consistently, however, with the Reasons
already stated, it must rest with the Sovereign of such State,
what Reception should be given to Her Alajesty irt Mut
Character.

fhe King's Servants were particularly anxious to impress
upon the Queen's Law Officers the public grounds upon
whit!) this principle rested.
The general rule of Foreign Courts is to receive only those
who are received at home.

The King could nut with propriety require any point, a
Foreign Governments, the refusal of which would nut afford
his Majesty just grounds of resentment or teinonstrance.'
It would be neither for the King's dignity, nor fur the
Queen's comfort, that she should be made the subject of such
a question.

t his it was replied for the Queen, that with respect to
1164 new proposition on the part of thy King's Servants, it
chould he taken into inswedialt consideration; but Her Ma-
jesty's Law Officers observed, that Her Majesty was not in the
situation referred to in the above reasoning, having hem ha-
bitually received at Court in this Country fur many years, and
having only ctased to go there in 1814, out of regard to the pe-
culiarly delicate situation in which the unfortunate ditfe-
ences in the Royal Family placed The late Quern.
The Wirt obset ration was met, on the part of The King's
Servants, by a re-assertion of His Majesty's undoubted au-
t hot ity uu this point, whether as King, or as Prince Regent,
iu the exercise of the Royal Authority; that the Court held
by Her late Majesty was in fact the Court of The Prince
Regent, then acting in the name and on the behalf of His
late Majesty, and that the presiint Queen, then Princess of
Wales, was estluded from such Court.
(Signed) WELLINGTON.
CASTLEREAGH.
IL BROUGHAM..
T. DENMAN.

(No. V.)
PROTOCOL of the Fifth Conference, held at the Foreign-

, °thee, June lyth 1820.
The Protocols of the precedin; Conferences were read and
agreed upon.

kler litjesty's Law ()dicers stated, that the Propositiun of
yesterday had been submitted to Her Majesty, and that it
had ❑ut produced any alteration in Her .Majesty', senti-
mt. OAS.

In order to avoid any misinterpretation of the expression
used tau welitiouing their belief that Ler Majesty usii,,,ht over-