The Sun.
London, England, 1842-03-21 00:00:00

THE TORY INCOME _TAX.

OPINIONS OF T E COUNTRY PRESS.
• (Frozli t•he Scotsman.)
linarmitd sri;lerne, the eotWnod product of

The 7,ranl
• ,
Tory skill, the fruit of six months' gestat:oli, is at I`ll.,
before us, in the shape of—an income tax ! ! The void
in the Treasury which the Whig Ministers would have
supplied by abating the existing monopolies of corn,
sugar, timber, and other articles, without laying an ad-
ditional burden of one shilling upon the country, fur-
nishes occasion, in the hands of the Tory Government,
for the imposition of a tax, the most repugnant to the
habits and feelings of a free people—a tax so odious, so
inquisitorial, and oppressive, that statesmen of all parties
have hitherto regarded it as a resource to be reserved
for some great exigency, such as a war which threatened
our, national existence. The miserable mockery, pre-
sented to us under the name of a Corn-bill, led us to
anticipate something'bad enough in finance ; but we were
not prepared—and the country certainly was not pre-
pared—for anything so monstrous as this. -
(From the Glasgow Chronicle.)
To the principle of an income tax, the people of this
Country have a strong, and, as we think, a just, repug-
nance, both on account of its inquisitorial character, and
its unequal operation. To tax a man who derives two or
three hundred pounds a year from trade, or in the form
of an annual payment for his services, to the same extent
as a man who draws the same income from land or other
stable property, is obviously unjust. The latter is a far
richer man than the former, yet he pays no more. The
principle of paying according to ability is quite lost
sight of.

(From the Brighton Guardian.)
And now let us ask our readers what they think, in a
period of peace, of an income tax of 7d. in the pound ?
We regard this whole scheme of income tax as the
necessary consequence of the Corn-law, and a mere de-
vice to raise the revenue of the country by taxing the
people, instead of raising it by setting trade and industry
free. We consider Las a great blow to future prosperity.
A tax which falls so heavily as nearly three per cent. on
the profits of trade and on the incomes of all the middle
classes will in reality go a considerable way towards
crippling their means of consumption and of saving, It
will tend to arrest the increase of employment. Let it
be always remembered that the addition to our burdens
is the price we Day for Corn-laws and the ascendancy of
Sir Robert Peel. A reformed Parliament, under a Tory
Premier, laying on an income tax in peace will be a phe-
nomenon in history and moral science.
(From the Bristol Gazette.)
We are not old enough to remember the practical
grievances and annoyances experienced under the former
imposition of this tax, but the slightest reflection on the
subject must show that of all direct taxation it is the
most unjust, and to the feelings of Englishmen, most ab-
horrent in its prying inquisitorial character. The visits
of a tax-gatherer, whether for state ar local burdens, are
never of a particularly gratifying description ; but to
have a pert official poking his nose into every man's
ledger,inspecting his private cash-book, exposing his
business to his neighbours and rivals in trade, extorting
an extra per tentage from him on the twitting plea that
Mr. So and So, in the same line, conducts a more profit-
able concern—is an unbearable intrusion, only to be re-
sorted to in the case of the last necessity: And the in-
justice of the scheme is palpably apparent.
(From the Bury Post.)
The Minister has recurred to that tax which the "im-
patience" of the country shook off at the close of the war,
and proposes to renew it in all its odious features of in-
quisitorial and unequal assessment. The professional
man and the tradesman, whose laborious avocations bring
them in an income under any circumstances precarious,
and which death may annihilate to-morrow, are
to pay precisely the same tax as the owner of a landed
estate or investment in the funds yielding an equal
amount of income. But these are not the greatest ob-
jections to the tax upon incomes ; the intolerable evil is
its inquisitorial character, and its tendency to encourage
deception. "It is," as Mr. M'Culloch describes it, "a
tax upon honesty, and a bounty upon perjury and fraud."
The conscientious will pay the tak on the full amount of
his profits ; the man of "easy virtue" will pay just as
little as he thinks he can induce the commissioners or
inspectors to be satisfied with. It is in vain to talk of
it as a temporary enactment. Let the tax be once laid on,
and we shall have no hope of living to see it removed.
(From the Cambridge Advertiser.)
It has been held, and we believe justly held, by the
ablest political economists, that a tax of this nature can
be justified only by urgent and extreme necessity. It
is impossible to adjust it in such a manner that it shall
not press upon many individuals with harsh and unequal
severity. And if that necessity arise, it would for many
reasons be the best and fairest way to tax property ;,nly,
and not the profits arising from trade or professional
exertions, at least nut to tax the latter to the same
amount as the former.

Taxation should be regulated by the principle that
the relative condition of the parties. upon whom taxes
are imposed, should not be at all changed by their im-
position. No one would venture to assert that the pro-
posed, income tax will stand this test. It is, therefore,
founded on the grossest injustice, and Sir Robert Peel
may be assured that, unless he make some great altera-
tions in the details of his plan, he will create throughout
the country a feeling of indignation whieh no Minister
can withstand.
(From the Tyne Mercury.)
We thought the day had gone by when such a vile
imposition as . that bearing, the name of income tax
would ever again be laid upon the people of Great
Britain. Those who remember the character given to
this tax just before it was abolished, after the last war
with France, will be of the same opinion with ourselves.
It was then designated as the most odious, abominable,
inquisitorial, and unconstitutional of' imposts. It Was
proved to be so from the injury it produced to trade—
from the shameful intrusion it caused upon the privacy
of business—from the troubles and vexations which it
brought upon . great numbers of persons of variable
means, or of hardly any means, though they endeavour
to keep up a respectable appearance. An income tax,
modified as Sir Robert proposes, will at the present time
be one of the most unpopular, as well as unprofitable,
taxes that could be imposed. We hope this proposal of
Sir Robert's will be universally scouted. We cannot
think it will be carried, when it was thrown out in one of
the most rotten Tory Houses of Commons that ever
existed.

(From the Wilts Independent.)
Had Sir Robert Peel wished to have acted fairly by
the people in proposing an income tax, he i'vould have
made the per centage increase gradually with the amount
of income; in this way the rich would have been made
to contribute their fair proportion and to have borne that
share which equal taxation would impose. As usual, the
weakest go to the wall. There are other and grave ob-
jections to any income tax. Independently of the vexa-
tions and heart-burnings which its collections must cause,
and which were so severely felt as to induce the people
almost with one voice to demand its repeal when it before
existed, there is this objection, that it deals precisely the
same with the man whose income is the fruit of his in-
dustry only, as with him whose income arises from the
rent of an estate, or the interest of money placed out on
any security. This is not right.
(From the Devizes Gazette.)

T hat a tax of three per cent. will be severely felt by per-
sons of small income, and that it will bear much harder
on those .who derive their incomes frOm the exercise of
laborious trades and professions, than on those who de-
rive it from the rents or annual proceeds of property,
cannot be denied: This is a great, and to some extent
(we fear) a necessary evil. Still, however, something
may be done to mitigate it; and, when we come to be in-
formed of the details of the measure, we shall probably
find that something has been done for this purpose. We
shall be very glad to see the measure fully and minutely
discussed, in order that it may be rendered as unexcep-
tionable as possible.
• (From the Nottingham Review.)
At this period, when trade is depressed and commerce
paralyzed, when bankruptcies and insidvencies.abeund,
whgn the closing of shops, the half-working of mills, and
the loud wailings Of the unemployed artizans, conjoin in
attesting the severe pressure upon commercial transac-
tions— when the country is looking out for relief from
the heavy burdens which oppress it, Sir Robert Peel
announces in the House of Commons his intention to
propose an income tax The Tories have been restored
to power, to impose a galling and inquisitorial income
tax upon the country ! The shopkeepers and manufac-
turers instead of having the relief of a cheap loaf, are to
feel the weight of additional burdens, and to mar! it the
more, every farmer whose rent is less than 3001. is to be
excused from paying any income tax ! This is to mon-
strous insult to the commercial classes; they asked bread,
and the landlords' Government gives them a stone.
(From the Dublin Pilot.)
No man can now talk of Peel's wise and just plan,
without proving himself very silly or very dishonest.
The first bait for catching minnows thrown out by this
political impostor and knavish man, was, the name of
" income taxes." This tax was associated at once in the
public mind with bearing heavy on large, arid light on
small properties—with throwing burdens on real pro-
perty, and relieving industry from now intolerable bur-
dens ; but judge what is felt of the tax now, when it is
found to be taxing the property of a man of 1501. per
annum equally in proportion with a man of 150,000/.
when it is found to tax income obtained by hard earning
as well as that enjoyed in idleness, and instead of reliev-
ing manufacturing industry, adding to the ruinous pres-
sure upon it. An income tax is no relief under such cir-
cumstances—it is wanton violation of principles of free-
dom—inquisitorial, unequal, and relieving no class, while
oppressing many.
(From the Sherborne Journal.)
WE MUST PAY roil. PEEL.— After all the expenditure
of money and ill feeling which was engendered by the
last general election, what has been obtained ? The
'substitution of one ministry for another—the placing of
Sir Robert Peel on the Treasury Bench instead of Lord
John Russell. Now we can calmly ask landoWners and
farmers, whether they expected any such measure as
the amended sliding scale for corn, and a tax of 3-Ad. in
the I/. on the rental paid for their estates ? And we
may also take leave to ask the monied and mercantile
interest, how they will like to hand over to the tax-
gatherer 30/. for every 1,000/. per annum of their in-
comes ? and, at the same time, we may remind the
clergy and the other professions that they will not be
exemp;, after next October, from this heavy additional
claim on their incomes.

(From the Manchester Times.)
THE DOUBLE-FACED LANDLORDS.—WhiIe the object
was to defend the Corn-law, the farming interest was so
immense that all other interests must be taxed for its
especial benefit ; but when there is, a new tax ti, be
laid of 3,775,0001, the legislating landlords discover
that their tenants can contribute no More than 150,000/.,
or one twenty-fifth part of the whole !
(From the Manchester Guardian.)
PROPOSED REDUCTION OF THE COFFEE DUTIES.—
The alteration of the coffee duties which Sir Robert
Peel proposes is of such a nature as to offer very little
benefit to the consumer, while it is likely to entail a con-
siderable loss on the revenue. He proposes to reduce the

•
luty on colonial coffee from 6d. to 4d. per lb. Will the coa-
st:filers reap any benefit from ;ha; Ot ill the lea,t. Tao
rd
: -

v;?ntie

.A 41,/ ; Lilt!
They are unable to furmsh this country vitathe wliole
quantity of coffee required for its consumption, as is
proved by the fact that, in 1840, the respective amounts
or duty paid on British possession and foreign coftee were
as follow :
British plantation coffee X 373,579
5
Foreign
Here it will be seen, that our imports of fertigu coffee
amounted to considerably more than one-half of the entire
quantity consumed; and as the price which it bears in the
market,. duly paid, must necessarily rule the price of co 0:
uml coffee, it is evident that any reduction. of duty
aorri
the latter, without a full equivalent reduction of_di,
on the former also, is merely a bonus to the West this
interest. If any evidence were wanted to show that
ttes
will be the practical result of the new scheme of
it may be found in the fact, that, as soon
Peel's proposed plan became known in the L.
too Inri:
market, an immediate rise of ss. 6d, per cwt.
on British coffee, while foreion remained witllt'ovt.
provement. In Liverpool, an advance a ws-speeady
nt
on British took place; but foreign continued Under
former prices. The reason of tis is obvious.te
a s Sir ld?otnibi.eurui
d to the
the present scale of duties, the monopolY gr—t„ 66 2-3
British planter over the foreigner
per cent.; under the new scale, ain""ts will be in-
Obi wore
creased to 100 per cent. If Sir Robert Peel's
to benefit. the consumer, and to promote eenullake
Would make the duty on British coffee at sd. per I.ib.
to Bd. Per
reduce the duty on all kinds of foreign
Fhe.nionopoli .ec,
(From the Carlisle Journal) .
talents, must,
A tax upon income—upon the mere fruits of Inelnstr-
on the profits of trade and the exercise of its attire,
as a matter. of course, be so inquisitorial ill
nothing
sobutte opressive and unjust in its operation, b'• n Take
direst necessity can justify its iniPesitiliinstraW
the present proposition of Sir Robert Feel °;uri prix
its injustice. The professional man whosej3-linorrovir,
duce to him say 3001 a year, who, if lie die • es the
leaves his family destitute, is taxed as big" e, and
owner of a freehold estate yielding thelaikseiouri°:nraturel
which ceases not with his life. The ingiit
of such a tax was thul graphically painted by
he ri,ss
during the struggle for its abolition in 1816 ;etc hold
" There is nothing that men in a state Of s°c,. it'st 115
sacred into which it does not obtrude itself, or to
.„ents
ransack'
awl odious agents. It pries into the marriage
awl claims of consanguinity among the living! ,r3/r,, the
the wills of the dead, it hunts deeds and
deepest recesses of the bureau and drags them t° dre
17r
' Rushing into the counting-house,iutspreads wid le
shills wer
•
and thereby blasts commercial confidence, en- • „1- eper
cantile speculation. It stands at the door of the sutTe'evlir
and counts his customers ; it mounts the chariot of titeeo
sician, and numbers his fees. es It adjusts the
debtor and creditor whose
only •
be known to themselves.
It computes the feellll'intli
filial piety, relation to melte]:
of gratitude and humanity,- ins of P°L ed
by e t allow
shillings, and pence; for it estimates the suPPor to pelt'
to decrepit old age, to decayed services, perhaPs id
tent or discarded guilt. In short, if any menthesnor ti°
hether the income tax ought to apply in or
imaginary case, let him be assured that if its ePP ectetl
can render his home comfortless, or his closet snsriale
to him, there will the myrmidons of income mischiefl°
right to be. NM. is this the termination of the fid or
tirierue!b,l,ll
for, like every other tyrannic measure, its 113331 ()ale 0V
pressions have the 'effect of driving those who 51e„ IRK
jects of it to a corresponding degree of bases rasp"
rasP,,
hood, treachery, and perjury, in order to elude Ys
Those who remember the time when this te; icturr,
operation, know that this is not an overcharge" h'cbt
and
some notion may be formed of the odious ,Tente„;l*
which it was viewed in those days, and the fes,o-liee,t°o4-
mined of a publication of the facts which fbei-O-e ,
of the tax had compelled the tax-payer to disr;:
the fact that the House of Commons ordered ",,eta
meats to be destroyed—Lord (then Mr.) BrougA",- of '''`•
gesting that they should be burned by the Wu-
common hangman. W
And it is this odious tax which the Tories °, tb
pose to revive ! and which they are so bent tro-Pi.'l,ll.
they will not give the country time to expres6-ge few,,
upon it. Without warning, without time being Post e'44'
for consideration or remonstrance, a tax of tile 'f,
pressive kind is to be imposed upon the al- r'te`"t•
order that the landowners may enjoya little lengeoWer
monopoly monopoly or cern. Even in the imposition, the Posesr,
the landed aristocracy is felt. No farm is to he 300•,),'
to the income tax which is of a less rental thnll
year. In this county there are very• few farat'l cared,
reach that amount, and we believe there lsh- ,
re
the
one in the whole county of Westmoreland ‘ ir‘l,;ols°
do exist, speedy means will be taken to divide t;Thiarr,
te evade the tax, and thereby enable the lan,"°o'red
t obtain a larger rent. At present, for political. Ito 0
wo or three names are inserted in nearly' all ,e(loee;
farms exceeding 1001. or 1501. a year. This 't,be Ta
obtain the advantage of the Chandos clause 011,-,,,ebeeis•
form Bill, and through its operation the Tories:: tri e; f
placed in a position to dictate this tax to the e-ienfial'n
is only to carry the principle of division a -
e c,°l:
to enable the landlords, as far as their tenants,
cerned to evade the tax altogether, and thus -hj
he
burden from our own shoulders to those of t °ore,
community. The Chandos clause may,
3' Alle,'• for Le
made available by the aristocracy, not inere4 - see'-
t aining poll tical power, sbut for evading taxsea°lliorf -
of those •' blessings" bestowed
upon us by'
vernment.

THE MARKETS.
COUNTRY CORN MARKETS'

COUNTRY CORN AIARKETS./rd''
..--
----;7ort . •LA 1 Wheat. Barley. Oats. 1 - (.. „....• ,;. 0
'........--- ........ ....... ....-...--.......... ................ , 0
Per Quarter. s. to s. s. to i.. e. to s. a• 1° 55 '5
605t06
Ilraintiee .52 70 27 34 ;•3 20 ;.4, 44 t
Is ighton 6O r 8 28 :•7 22 28 a• pl ii 37
Cambridge. , — 60 25 i 10 "7, 42 135 ,•
Chichester :6 to 25 23 20 23 1 1 a; ,
Dunmow M 01 22 33 20 26
„,,,.° 401,
Grantham
Grimsby 56 74 29 33 IS 21 •," 54
~,," 51
llailsham 66 72 29 33 'A 21 22„ 411 51 91
Hitchin 5O 67 '27 34 20 30 „,•:-• 51 d ge
Ipswich 6O 67 23 52 21 26 ••',.,, 56 '".,! /
Lewes ,i4l 66 32 31 21 22 04 54 _ 3.•
Lynn 5O 64 24 a 18 ka as„ 40 36 ii
Maidstone 59 67 36 39 26 32 •)u v • 91_
Norwich
l'etworth
Romford 54 18 "25 St 18 :8 332" 1:9 Of Is
Sandwich 6l 71 21 34 •?5 30 44 0 5..
Thetford
wisbccli 57 63 28 34 18 21 31 53 ~1 •
Withs. 4 5B 68 24 30 31 21 27 40 i " ot,
larruouth 160 69 SO 32 24 30 36 ~$) /
LEEDS CORN .o t, It liEr. 544. • ttl” 6
Wheat, Norfolk and SWIM lc, 601 b. „. ~ :so ....4.
it
York. and I.iiicoln. 601 b
..1;i
,0;$.1
tarley, Norfolk and Sullblk .... . ............................ v;,••,,
..
~
- Yorkshire and Lincolnshire ... ............... . .....
„,„..,. !0 •
Grinding . ....••.•'. 4v , 00 pl,
Beans
Oats, Potatoe . ,
—Molding, For. 103. tolOY,d Eng. 10d.„ to :19 kr: '

Oats, Potatoe .... .1cl• P'ler'"4
....................................
~ 1 , r „.
---mealif?g,... ,otoyvt. ,E)g. 10.1. toy' Vic` o
Shelling " ' • 6.. ti
DEVIZES CORN MARKEL ,I. ai p
f. 0
,5:-.4
Per Sack. s. d. a. d. Per Quat ter. ,2, •,,, t
lirst W 'tea*
Second :=2 0 to :3 0 Oats... ............ .. ,:6
,0(''.4... d
29 P b I 0 Beans (per sack)"' ~ s
Phird - • 21 0 25 0 Flour (per bag) ... ..
.1 d,
barley 24 0 34 0 Bread (pergallon, J. i. I
CHELTENHAM MARKETS. 9 1
Per Bushel. s. d. to s. c 1.,. Pet 11-,' ...' ti 1
% "eat
tiarley.
f.i,
Oats 3 0 3 9 Veal .................... „, '4 r
Beans .
5 0 b 0 Lamb .............. •r••;00, .
(*ease
Hay 41.5s to 4/. 105. 0,1...Pe ,0 /0 ,
CA1,111.11tIlt) RI IHARKEI• ....J.,",, a'
Wheat, white—...... 655. to Os. 01/1,....,f',.....5. 0,....,
----- recl---....... 6 .s. to 6•a .. 01d,....".", ..' may, to,'
Barley, Nlalting -30 s to 34. „,„,,,,, Ornalup.. o'4' to ~
'
Oats .;
—....—.... •....21s. to 01. s. 01.4,.....---' ,`'tee ,
Bean-. 32s to 405......., Old-••••••'''',.„`' '4;' ~,
Pease ----. 40s. to -s. Grey ---- • .0 .i,
CHELMSFORD AIARKt:T.
.. , ..... 0 ,1
Wheat, White .. • 4
' 7 to 60 : Oats ........................ st
Red
Varley lO :3'2 white ......... go
.. 0
Chevalier....... 33 34 • Beans, Tic% . .........
.„..
‘=vinding
HULL CORN AIARKL.r. . 60,60' wt.
Wheat, White (per Quarter) ..................
~,. -s 90.
Red ......................................... •,,. 6ls: sss.
" .3 , . .s.
Foreign
_,.. 3,
Barley, Malting ...................................... t 5., F 9! 'Pie'
GriEding ............................. .. ..... 10,.. .•,!* 5-2 s,
'lritish
Foreign (in bond) ......................... 31,,, S.; :its.
8ean5...... ... ....... :.„,4i, 5, . os.
...................
Pease, Grey ......
...3,,, fit, els
Bute and .White........................... _4... ,t 2,6
Linseed
...................
..• i 51' ''' ,
Flour per sack - •
Rapeseed (per I. quarters) . .............. -.701'. . fjni'
4DINBURGH CORN MAn',o%-i. i ••, 4
Wneat. Barley, Oat"• 401. 7i;o ‘
First IS,. tiel 244 Of. S3s 4.f. :35d(. '
i .cou . I
l'oird
.: •-•1
Average price of Wheat ............ ••••''
le• 1. Oa l,;
FruCkS OF FkoVlSioNs 0,. ~
wet*, 010 90 v„
'leer, per 0., ....... 01. bd. to Ov, 7d,, Fresh Bi „....., 0 1. u
fi1utt0ti................- 0 5 0 7 Salt 1)lri!-J;;",,„,7 9 ,0 0
Veal «»..........,..,, 0 7 010 Ditto, Pee:. d 0... 7 e ;., il
1 t.1riCAp0v0........".e•0vw 0 5 0 7 Egg,' 11,„7,kp1.)."' 0 0 e, f
!mum, per qr. ......13 0 IL 0 OatS"rijitto." 0 6 i .
1 alum', cwt........ 30 0 42 0 Wl-•,°,.-viti° ^". pie
Q.tartern Loaf .........0 91 0 Ist 8ar1ei,,,,t.....r::r
c0tat0e5.1410.....- 0 0 0 5 fial,..ruAßKk'ort.lib. 110.1 ti 9
EDINtURGH hIEA- Stolle .... -., 1
Per Sack or 2801 b. Imp. ,trOeratnical ................ ' 09 I
Fit st Oatmeal
Second ditto..,
... .......
Blrleymeat.
P-asenseal I 8 0 l'e,t4,Eis. per JAC
Pot Barley from 30L

Oats,

CORNWALL MARKETS.
(Calculated at 24 gallons to the bushel.)

1 tit
,: tt
7,-: ---71. i" :.1 iv
_ 0 4, i
. .••• • • e 5 ,
8 0 :i
.',
4 --- g 3i.
ti ---A i t
N " I e
4
0 '2
t l'..'
—.;_
tti.te...................i.................."...—'90.....
Off
ChOarnletsh BIRT II 5. are, ~
On the 19th inst" at Watkin's-terrace, Fato,i-sqd ~,,,iy
lady of Lieutenant-Colonel Tronson, 13th Lig'at Intanvi
epletthari,nsotr.,aacti ,'it!'
a daughter.
' 1 r• L• I/rarici°
On the 20th inst., at :South Lambeth, :1 rs. ../. L.
,
alltcg,iiceste.r-strect, Leicr:ster-square,
t f a daughter. .-----'
_ --___--.....--______ _______-------- •
'4 ./4 R h' I E D. 01°
• OP
On the 16:11 inst , at the British 1-,;,,,La..5y, Paris, OO4
John Fordyce, of the J3,ngal Ardiery, to 31afia t..5„,,F
youngest daughter of the late Ila
the Island of Barbadoes. 'pies Gibbet Allerle, ''' ' i
144
On the 19th inst., at Si% George's. I3loomsburY, 4ie.
Nash, Esq., of Woburn-place, to Miss Andersou, of 3°"/
square.
-------------------
DIED. . I flitt
n t
On the 14th inst., at Cardigan, of a deg) deeline,'-,°- tiote
I.u(7nettihaeGl6e,heninßset.ll.a.mt yK
relict of the late W. J. B. Hall, Esq , or fir}rairion .
Peml,rokeshire. 0
i• i , pp.
On the 20th inst., at her residence, —loco 11 9 t
i ch Fillt '
uar
On the • '
is. 14th ins'., in tiuildfordtreet, Russell
J.lmes Cull, •
aged 53. •
-.-• 14.e5•10.1........1u. a5m0uararta......n....... --.-...., (i, e 1
enFington, 'he Dowager ....a--; f
LAlden, : 1-, --- --- rw. ,tr4/I.r 3'
, mit,: - rid l'ublis• :eel .•'s ',"' 41-"" 04
1., ::2, .z.,.„,,,,
~, .i..„. -..'..
~j,,,, y . iv/. Stro,
the Count of Middlesex, Alenday, March 21, 1042.

Bartel.

Wheat.

f. fi.
-. g ;

# d. to e. d•
truro .. 0 7 5
neliteme
St. Austell — 0 S 0
totlinin .-0 8 8
..isheard __o 7 u
Launceston _ 0 7 5 •
Catrwlfoni 6 6 7 1 3
Penzance