The Sun.
London, England, 1816-05-09 00:00:00

•
cicc~trr'eil. ('ii tliat ieiief be (Mi.. toot hit
-other ncite than to reconrnend the writer to he,-
. ware' how he probeeded further in the line whidi
he had adopted,, tit, it might:involve ltitn in a 1.4i6-
dieament that mi4lit not be quite .eonv-eoleot
him. Sometitne afterwards, when he was 200
miles from London itt the discharge Of his pro.'
tensional duties, he silw the whole of the enrres-
poride»cc published in a Isfewspaper. or this
he took no notice, although he haul' since re-
gretted that he 'Mid not listened to. the
strong recommendations of his .I,Liendi to bring
the person in question before that • Hotise.—
The Honourable Gentleman had that bight given
Advice of another description. lie htid unequi-
vocally hinted, that he (Mr. Brougham) ought
to have given to the individual in question another
species of satisfaction. In vain did the Hon.
Gentleman shake his head. His expressions were
' too distinct to be misunderstood. He (Mr. B.)
had acted on the occasion alluded to from the
dictates.of his own judgment and feelings ; and
be begged leave to inform the Hon. Gentleman,
that there was one species of persons by. whom
he would never allow himself to be influenced—
those Ivho, interfering between two individuals,
endeavoured to produce a personal altercation be-
tween•them.

r. Al A it RY ATI, in ex planation , observed that he
did not mean to impute blame to the Hon. and
Learned Member 01r. B.) for not having given
Satisfaction to the person alluded to. At the-same.
time, he could not approve of the statvment
which had been made of that person—,that he
had said, bread and water. would. . be food good
enough for the lower orders of the people. Such
an assertion must have been prejutlicial to a man
who gave.employment to nearly 2006 persons
Ile (Mr. M.),thought, that in writing or speak.;
tog or any person, whether in 'or out of the House,
the rule should be, ".Ne quid falsi tlicere ,aut
scribere andeat." •

HaouonAM 'explained.:
The CHANaeLLOR of theExcnrauan spoke to
order, after which-
- Mr. Baouonlik observed, that with regard to
the motion Which he had sohMitted, he woold,not
take tip more of the tinie of the House, as it was
not intended to oppose it. Ile would tesere his
observations on what had Nllen from the lion.
and Licari-1d Gentleman opposite, to the tints
'when the Bill; which he should have the honour
to submit, should be 'brought before the' House.
Leave was then given t(i'bringin the Bill.
DANK nEsnucTroNs.

The Order of the Thty‘for the farther consider
ration of the Report of the Bank Restriction!
Bill Inning been read, ,
Lord FoLKsTont rose again to oppose the mea-
.Snre, convinced that were lid Opted, cash pay-
ments would never be resumed; Ile then nonved
that the Report be taken into further considerar
tion this day six months.
Mr. GEIENFeLt. should feel himself guilty of a
dereliction of his public dory, it he did not seize
this ppportunity of resisting the measine,
Mr. l'itifttN.G defended the lhl(, which gave a
direct intimation to the that it was rX-
peeled they would restnhe cash payments art the
cud of two, years. It the considerkitioo. of the
port were put off to this (hiy six months, the taxes
could not he collected, dud the whOle wheels of
the public machinery woidd be stopped.
/Niter a. few tvords from Mr. Hainmersley, the
qut,!,iiort was put, and the athendment nekitived
witliont a'divisiun.

llr. liottiveit then proposed to add a clause to
the Bill to the following etiect.---provided 'always
and be it enactrd, that the*Directors.of the Bank
ithout delay take such measures, of preparation,
0$ to their judgment and wivioni may appear tit-
t 4, to enable diem to resnnie..cah pigments as
soon atter the poising of. thi4 Act, as in their
judgment may seem practicable and %ale.
'the GnANCELLOR Of the Ls:CHEQUER opposed
the Clause as useless: It Was similar to that pro-
poeti by the Hon. Gentleman, whiFir.had already
beet' rejected,•and as he had not brought forward
any n'ew'arguttieliCl in its support, he should re-
sist its introduction. The declaration in the pre-
amble was'to the same effect, and would answer
,cvery pnipose.
Tae house then divided:
Attsinst the Clause 135.
Fur it
Minority itgaitiA it
On re.entering the Gallery, we found
,Lard
CAsn.r.tlP,A9-13 postponing the.second .reading of
the Alien Bill till tn.-Morrow. His Lorthdrip was
unaostood to shy, that he should not prciss it. to-
mOrrow, it Friday could be appropriated to it.
The Local Militia Ballot Bill, and the Irish
Clerk of the Picas Rill,went through (.',unitnittees.
—Reports to-morrow.
Mr. Husxtssor: brought in a Bill 19 amend and
render more elfecti've the Act for the construction
of a New Street from Carlton-House to Mary-,le-
hone Park.--Iteard a first time, and ordered for a
second reading to-morrtm'.
COLTHTENAY presented Papers
from
the
East India Company, stating the separation of
the Commercial from the 'Volitieal Accounts of
the Company.—Ordered to lie on the table.
Adjourned at Half-past 'l.lwelve o'Clock.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF KING'S BOWL MAY 8

THE KING V. INHABITANTS GE ALL SAINTAi-SIZEBY

This was a case,reierved by the Sesaions of the
County of ,llerl,y, upon the
,tpiestion whether a
pauper gained a settlement utideo the tollnwipg
circumstances Corpormion ot Derby at
first employed the pauper to take sand and.gravel
from the river by way of removing a ifnisanee.—
The sand and gravel so removed afteewards turned
out to be valuable, and they therefOre ulti-
mately granted the privilege to the defendant
aS a right. The question was, whether the enjoy-
went, so granted, was an, incorporeal hereditament
or tenement so as to entitle the holder, At) 4,Set-
dem ent as au occupier. it was aar!,,,no by Mr.
Perm.,
.that the taking the sand and gravel was
no wore a tent:Ult:tit, titan a scay.orger.who cleaned
the stteets.ot, Lundon could be
,said to hotii te-
nement,

The Court, how-ever, held that it was ►►to:e to
be likened to a right ‘Qt: coinnwn., anti, that it
gikineti n settleme►►t,