The Sun.
London, England, 1827-11-10 00:00:00

SUMMARY.

Now there are four parties whose interests will be in-
creased by the proposed undertaking, viz.—
]. The Country Banker, 13. The'Public, and
2. The London Banker, 14. The Government.
I. The COUNTRY BANKER, who will he under no neces-
sity of keeping funds in his drawer, or in the hands of his
London bankers.

1. He will be free from the loss occasioned by forgeries,
which sometimes compel hini to call in the whole of his
circulation.

2. He will no longer be liable to the "formidable rival-
ship of Joint Stock Banks.
3. Nor will the Bunk of England have the slightest plea
for the continuance of its branch banks.
4. He will save
.the commission on his notes paid in
London, as well as his annual licence.
5. He will participate in the profit of the whole amount
he circulates, no advantage having hitherto accrued to him
from his use of Bank of England notes.
6. He will be furnished with the same amount of issues
he now has, and on the same description of securities that
he has himself advanced upon, at half per cent. less on the
amount of his circulation than he now pays.
7. He will be enabled to get his hills discounted at the
market rate of interest by the National Bank, which will
atfoBr.d him, on oi
will
he
emfeir.egee nfici.o ensi, ervuentsy
andneedful
ala i.1)11i-so,te,c,ttliioi 1:1_, ,
it
is
well known, commence with his notes, and end with his
deposits.
11. The LONDON BANKER.
1. A most important source of profit will certainly ac-
crue to the London banker us.ng the National Bank notes
(if a proprietor (f its stock), ital-e, as he must be, that
he is a silent participator of the pi3st derived from every
note in his possessiOn.
2. He will be freed from the ')le and expense of pay-
ingEi the notes of the country bai '` for which the trilling
commission he receives is no con ation.
3. Above all, he will save Ins g nintry connexions, so
valuable to him, from being destroyed by the monopoly of
the Bank of England, on whom he will no longer be de-
pendent. ,
111. The Puoric will have a sound and healthy circulat-
ing medium, free from every species of tampering, by the
publicity given to the issues of the National Bank, as well
as from the high character of the Directors.; the poor will
not be subject to loss by the failures so incident to the
country circulation ; and,the rich will be free from those
ruinous fluctuations in property to which they have been
so long subject ; whilst the man of limited income will be
enabled, from the general steadiness of prices, to apportion
his expenses accordingly. .
IV. The GOVERNMENT will at length have the satisfac-
tion of setting the currency question at rest, which the fur-
ther extension of Joint Stock Banks would render more
difficult and dangerous than ever, from their unlimited
powers of issue, whilst it would share with the people all
the advantages to be derived from the rivalship of two
powerful establishments.

- STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 9.
1783 Bank of Ireland establish-
ed with a capital of £600,000
(Raised at par
I from the pro•
1
1791 Additional capital • 400,000 prietors, in pro-
portion to their
original stock.
. 500,000 at '75 per cent.
.1,000,000 at 125 per cent.

1797 Ditto
1808 Ditto

1821 Ditto

2,500,000
500,000 as a bonus.

. £3,000,,000
Viz. Stock.
.E. s. d. X. s. d.
P 782 Paid
1791 Ditto 66 13 4 66 13 4
1797 Ditto 62 10 0 83 6 8
1808 Ditto 2OB 6 S 166 13 4
1821 Bonus - 83 6 8

£437 10 0 £5OO 0 0

Present value 500/.
Bank Stock at 250 ............... 1,250 0 0
Deduct Payments ............... 437 10 0

Leaves a profit to
every original sub-
scriber of 100/. of .£812 10 0
Besides baying received an interest of 12A- per cent. on the
money paid for many years as dividend—say 50/. per annum.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov. 9.

FURNIVAL V. BOGLES AND CO.

Mr. HEALD applied to the Court for a suspension
of an order made in this cause some days
_ago, for

- _
the payment out of Court of money which had been
paid in respecting the subject of the shit. His
Lordship would recollect, that an injunction had
been obtained restraining the defendants from selling
certain shares in the British Rock Salt Company,
which had been deposited with then for securing
the payment of bills they had discounted. On that
injunction being granted, the Court had made the
order, upon condition that at the same time a sum
of 13,0001. should be paid into Court. When the
matter came on the other day upon a motion that
the injunction might be dissolved, a compromise
was entered into, when it was agreed that an order
should be made for payment to the defendants of
the 13,0001. It appeared now that the person who
was present in Court on behalf of the plaintiff had
inadvertently agreed to that proposition, or rather
that he had in fact not agreed to it at all. The
plaintiff was desirous that the matter should come
again before the Court, and as the defendant had
given notice that he should this day peremptorily
call upon the Registrar to draw up the order, the
present application was that the order might be sus-
pended, and a day fixed for the argument.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said the application ap-
peared to him a very singular one. He remembered
perfectly the facts, as well as the circumstances that
attended the discussion. A proposition was made
by the Learned Counsel who now applied; it
was sanctioned by the solicitor, or by the person
who represented the solicitor ; and upon being made,
it was agreed to by the Counsel on the other side.
Now it . was attempted to be set aside, on the
ground that the solicitor did not intend to
consent to the proposition. If he did not choose to
attend himself, but sent some person with insuffici-
ent authority, or who had mistaken his authority, it
was his own fault, and he must abide by any in-
convenience that might result from the conduct of

is agent.
Mr. HEALD said the clerk did not consent, he oh-

jected ; and it was because he and his Learned
Friend Mr. Knight thought, from the instructions
then before them, that the proposition was the best
that could be made for the interests of their client

,hat they took it upon themselves.

The LORD CHANCELLOR said, if the clerk • had
any objection to make, he ought to have made it in
the face of the Court : if he did not he was bound
by the proposition to which he had agreed.
Mr. HEALD said, that might be the practice on
the other side of Westminster, but he did not know
that it ever prevailed in this Court.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said, there could be no
difference upon a point of this sort between the
practice in this or in any other court.
Mr. SUGDEN said, the case was exactly as his
Lordship had represented.

The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that in strictness,
the point was clearly against the party making the
application.
Mr. HEALD wished to explain that the object of
his clierit was, as he understood, only to prevent
the sale of the shares. That accomplished, the sa-
crifice of what he and his friend Mr. Knight, con-
sidered a minor point—the payment of the money
out of Court—he thought they might safely agree
to. He had, however, been since informed, that in
thinking so they were mistaken.
After some further discussion, permission was
given by his Lordship that the case might be
brought on to-morrow.

DEARLE V. BROWN.

This was an appeal from a decision of the late
Sir Thomas Plomer, when Master of the Rolls.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said he had considered
with great care the judgment given by Sir Thomas
Plomer, and the authorities cited by him in support
of that judgment. He was so much convinced of
the soundness of the decision, that he felt at present
no disposition to overturn it. He would, however,
consider the case and give his opinion on this appeal
shortly.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 9.

SAMUELS V. THE ROYAL EXCHANGE ASSURANCE COMPANY,

This was an action upon a policy of insurance,
valued at 1,7001., upon the ship Salmon River, char-
tered from Sierra Leone to London, with a cargo of
timber. The cause was tried before Lord Tenter-
den at the last London Sittings. It then appeared
from the evidence that the vessel • arrived in the
Thames on the 18th of February, 1826. It was
intended that she should discharge her cargo in the
King's basin, Deptford, but the entrance to the dock
being blocked up with ice, she was unable to eater.
She was consequently moored to the chains of one
of the hulks off Deptford, and the captain discharged
all her crew except the apprentices, and then pro-
ceeded to London to communicate with his prin-
cipals. On the 26th of February it was attempted
to take the ship into the dock by the assistance of
some convicis, but owing either to the awkwardness
or carelessness of those men, she was run upon the
slips and perished. The question to be decided
was, whether the underwriters could be rendered
liable. The Judge left it for the Jury to decide the
question, whether or not the voyage was ended be-
fore the vessel was taken into dock. The Jury
found for the plaintiff.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL applied for a rule to
show cause why the verdict should not be set aside,
and a new trial granted.
Lord TEXTERDEN—Take a rule 'upon payment
of costs.

THE KING V. vitz

The defendant was indicted for perjury at the last
assizes for Essex. The perjury was alleged to have
been committed in support of two Excise prosecu-
tions. At the trial, the informations were found to
vary materially from the indictment ; but the con-
victions under the excise laws having been pro-
duced, which recited the informations as they were
laid in the indictment, the Judge suffered them to
go to the jury as evidence, and the defendant was
found guilty.
Mr. GURNEY now moved iir arrest of judgment.
--Motion granted.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nor. 9.
(Sittings in Banco.)
BATTIMWS V. CAT.INIM.

Mr. Justice PARK informed the counsel for the
defendant in this case, who yesterday moved for a
rule to show cause why a new trial should not lie
had, that Mr. Justice Burrough had spoken with the
Lord Chief Justice, and that the Court had in con-
sequence determined to grant a rule to show cause.

LEVY V. MILNE AND DUCKWORTH.

This was an action of libel brought by the plain-
tiff, who is a Jew and sheriff's officer, against the
publishers of a minor periodical, called the Spirit (y.
the Times, in which was published a number of
verses, which the plaintiff alleged held him up to
general ridicule, and were calculated to injure him in
his professional character. These verses, it will be
remembered, were headed " Levy the Bum." The
case has already been twice tried, and on both occa-
sions the Jury found a verdict for the defendant. In
the first instance, because they did not believe the
publication to be a libel on the plaintiff; and in the
second, because they did not believe the testimony
of the plaintiff's attorney and his clerk, who were
Called to prove that the defendants were the
publishers. After they had given their evi-
dence, the Lord Chief Justice discovered a me-
morandum endorsed on the back of the publica-
tion, in the handwriting of the clerk, which he had
made immediately after he had called on Milne for
the purpose of getting an admission of the publica-
tion. This memorandum was in direct contradiction
Of the evidence which he had just adduced, and be-
ing unable to account for the difference' when (pies-
dolled by the Lord Chief Justice, his Lordship left
it to the Jury to say whether, after such a circum-
stance, they could place any confidence in his testi-
mony, and they replied that they could not ; and

there being no further proof of the publication)
verdict was returned for the defendant.
:Mr. Sergeant ADAMS now moved for a rule t°
show cause why that verdict should. not be set aside;
and a new trial granted, on two grounds,—first, the
the Learned Judge had misdirected the Jury ; 31'
secondly, that the verdict was against evidence.
Mr. Justice PARK desired to know what .evidenel
was given by the attorney and his cleric. et
Mr. Sergeant Ai?Ams replied, that they gl.lj,
called to prove the publication. At the first toed
the attorney (Mr. Charles Lewis) was alone p 10,4
in the box, but in consequence of some observati?',
made at the time on the circumstance of his be'vel'
called to support the case,.he bad in the last cto
rather shrunk from again appearing ; and in order d,
avoid_doing so, he had sent his clerk to the &n')e
ants. for the purpose of obtaining an admission of 1,0
publication. The clerk.at the trial was called IL
prove that admission, but not doing so substaxitill'
Mr. Lewis was induced again. to appear. It
after his evidence, had been given that the 1"e"-
random was found.
Upon hearing this, the COURT remarked
strong terms on the impropriety of an attoole.ifv,
sending his clerk to obtain admissions, when be h'ioe
self was afraid to appear in the box without °tier
one to support him, and they observed tlitit lot
such circumstances they did not think the jurYbeif
acted improperly in disbelieving both, nor did to 3
Lordships think that the Lord Chief Justice, „a
left the question of the credibility of the e/juel
improperly to the jury. 11'
Mr. Sergeant ADAMS insisted that there Os
thing to contradict the plaintiff's witnesses. oct
After having consulted for a short time, the L'°,"
refused to grant a rule on the grotto(' of inisd,re•o
tion; but were of opinion that enough had 1)000 t''
to warrant a reference to the Lord Chief .105°,11e
notes, in order that they might be satisfied that lit
verdict had been given against evidence.
Lordships, however, hinted to the parties tPt.r.,
would be the better way to put an end to allY
ther litigation this case, adding that they slic)"
think a stet processus would be most advisable.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Nov. 9. at'
In consequence of their Lordships having't°4l
tend to the ceremony of receiving
the new rio
Mayor, &c.; no judicial duties were discharge fsw
ic
this court to-day, except for about a quarter °hot
hour, during which Mr. Baron GARROW sat
a few short motions.

CONSISTORY COURT, FRIDAY, Nov 9.
HARRIS V. HARRIS
This is a suit for divorce by rea. son of. adoltic,)'
promoted by Mrs. Anna Maria Harris agaia't "jetr
husband, Captain George Harris, of the in'sd. 1)/
came now before the Court on a question as t°,l ''il
admission of the libel, some of the allegatictere
which were objected to. The acts of adulterY, s'the
alleged to have been committed principally
West Indies, where Captain Harris was in eOO-
~ge
of the Hussar frigate. The libel alleged that str'
►,. bo
women were admitted on board the frigate, a the
were considered by the Officers and crew
Captain's " ladies," in particular Lady Smith, ''''l„/4-
he brought in the Hussar from Barbadoes to v'„.
land in 1826, and who lived in "'unrestrained I"
tercourse" with Captain Harris during the °lgoe:
and who was reputed by the persons on hO3!
" another of the Captain's ladies ;" that 01111'5,,ith
rival at Portsmouth he behaved to Mrs. flarra'9,oe
coldness; and that lie took apartments ill
street for himself and Dame Eliza Smith, 8•:c .p
the
Dr. JENNER and Dr. LUSIIINGTON OPP°S-airfe,
admission of 'some of the allegatiOns, as vague'
gular, and unprecedentd s
Dr. PHILLIMORE and Dr. JESSE AP- tilettilY
Mrs. Harris, contended that, under the c'
stances, the pleas were perfectly admissible- oitt
Sir CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON, aftVr ret
that a good deal of latitude should be allowt— ci to
case like this,' where the adultery was allege,ici
have taken place chiefly in distant countries, 'ca.
ioal et gi el tP:;
1
hare
lady
libel
respect
o in
the
uot
af
trefn"l°
prevailed on board the frigate, amongst a descr''och
of persons not very nice in their notions tie
points. .0y;
The libel was directed to be reformed geitela te,
and wits subsequently admitted in its reformedsratlid
It is proper to mention, that in this and all 01,
cases the report is, in the present stage °f Polt°beeing
ings, necessarily ex-parte, the defendant D.
Is.
permitted to dispute the truth of the allegat lot

------""""""'"----
r 0
brought to our office this morninir 1— Worcester .froar
ver'
Barley in ear, anti peas in fall blossom, werj,
A quaker gentleman, covered with his be3,B:
was once in company with a lady rather too moll
~,,,'
covered, who drank to his " broad bottomed be2o,
The Quaker having thanked her for the honour edictlity,
observed, tilling up a bumper, "in return for thy '
MARIA, I drink to thy absent handkerchief."
, elle".'
CLERICAL DI L ENI I\l A .—III recently r,,,. #
eredminmduelpeenndent with her do
ing the fortunes of Mr. CANNING, we have had "GC
to mention, more than once, the celebrated Geneol Sac et,'
whosed youngest daughter graced with her hand, 5%,,r, °
th
it is well known of
his
public career. The Genead
wnt was through life noted for P13Y1.106
owing to
his extraordinary sucsess at a particular ~ the
obtained the familiar agnomen of :‘ whist -SCOTT. 11"1
dower, the late PRO'''. 'reb
Bthriches
of December, 1776, this Gallant Officer died as 1-,1111 of
Cr
es as years, at his seat of Balcombie, in the paris.v ill
mil, North Britain. At that period it was cuso°l' 1 /
Scotland, when so melancholy an event, as the (ionise (!tto
" muckle man" happened, within parochial limits, f.13r..010,
clergyman of the kirk to pronounce a sort of funeral r, e,
gium on the merits of the deceased, as they had heti,
po,
emplified in his:past conduct. Among a grave a' 1 i„„fil
ritanical people, like our northern neighbours, the p.,,,:i0,
propensities of General Scorr, which in that austere gor{
ration had been the subject of no trifling scautia r'' .ta
the above task one of peculiar difficulty and irksomeneltii
the Rev. PETER GLARS, the Minister of Crail.l d o
great shrewdness, s'l,veed 0
worthy Pastor, however, to
bumour, which often F01:1c1,
strong spice of eccentric
g predicaments, 01/, vitt'
extricate him out of embarrassin
proceeded in strict conforo3%d, t 0
eclat. He accordingly
such cases made and provorov
the historical recipe in
draw a nicely balanced character of the dead Gel 010
his virtues
against his frailties, Gard
regularly poising
working into a web of continuous moral anthitheses: ‘,, OA'
partial portrait of his late friend and patron. 110111,7rir
proached the termination of his discourse, custom pre' deo,
(perhaps in order that the auditory might the better °joy)
their own fate, by comparison of premises and cemell tbe
that the Rev. Censor should, at least, shadow. forVbeo
destiny that awaited the deceased in another World, r 11103
. 1.,
Nlr. GLASS came to'this important point, lienude 311, ,
emphatic pause;—and then proceeded with a sole'll'i,
earnest tone in these words; • " my dear friends, "Is'cieos
will na alloo me to ten', him to Heev'n, and mY c't'tiotl, ,
win'na let me sen' him to Hell ; but, do thou, ° sal:
thy infinite goodness tak him up ;' gie him a good 'ie,emo t I'l
~em
the bottomless pit ; hut, for Christ's sake, di"o3
fa' in. Amen !" For this anecdote, which is liutli 70 pre'i
and original, we are indebted to a gentleman who '`' ope li
sent on the occasion, and in our opinion it alford'iunui'
the best arguments ever advanced in favour of the '7
doctrine of Purgatory !—Leeds Intelligencer.
..................
______ _ _. --

On the '7th instant, a:Chagfortl, by the Bey' e
MARRIED. Vittp'ri:
flames, Mr George Crucknell, of Watling-street/ of
becca, only daughter of the late John Ileanes,k)q. -
hampton, Devon. • • i fscl•
DIED. p, au,
On the Sth instant, sincerely regretted, Wm• —h
►t
f /4,es,
of Hornsey-lane and Clerkenwell, aged 64.
On the 7th instant, at Fredville, in the county °
we,
John Plumptre, Esq., aged til. bii"
Oa the sth instant, at his residence in W°4 f
Bath, John Dunkin, Esq. aged 74. of
°t,
On the 30th ult., after a lingering illness of uP, OP e
four years, which he bore with the utmost fortitii"%idetico
John Langdale Sm:th, of the Boyal Navy, at hi' ciaetivot!
in Smith-square, Westminster, aged 60, deeplY of
by
On the all who4th kneinstanw himt, in her 74th year, Grace . ifol►
rJili'oe
. of 0
George-street, Woolwich, last surviving ilaugh:_evo toi
late i.llr. Samuel Hardin, whom she greatly re-e
fictive benevolence end private virtues.

the
PRINTED and PUBLISHEI, by M. YOUNG,
SUN-OFFICE, No. 11., Strand.

VICTUALTiII Co
Majesty'
1,4 THURsDAY,
ready to receive
fkor the
supply c
4Se of His maji
lendar Months
tiler until Six i
Inination of the
' The comiti,
Each 'Fonder
and be delivered
and must lie ;
,ponsible Pers(
Party tenderint
performance of
The Person
on his behalf; 1

VleTtja
FRE Co
llaisty's
.:RuksuAy, th,
:° Feceive Tend
'4PPIy (011
ntß's.4
ma. BEE]
Jesty33 shin
weive m
mita,
rnpbeltown
hathat,
31.1. c a"
b,,,,vr;" Nita?,
Falmouth
Greenock
Harwich
tiolyhead
r.in?stown ,

T
11' be;
or by a
riPzouth P
and Deal • and
tomeat
eat,
}a,nd
°
and be deli Tevnedre
ift." 'twat be
„'
rt
sPonible Pe
ay
Irk 0 cmierin
'le penal
f"et'a in the
the respecti
)11.Person
3 l'half;

TEA- at"
TEA
other lAMPI
het COVERS, F
VENIS„
j' EVAN'
ILL, r
lie has ju:Peet
useful , <'mworklll4l-Alt4,
iele'
s,
per Cent, oolidl

STOVE
}IRE G 4
R,l

tolitclNo b;s

\Vim.
L. sor
IN Poo
wicli
41brQ
berb,
I
sr?
141)11ri
ore "I.
X.
"141itia
e4ren.
NOtvill
11' 'Le
(.44 ir"rniuol
4''
xtoiyhea,
Ate es

V;I,Z o„
ev
Th
1.4 y
1) titbie
the 1446.4411 et
<
'
kt‘
Lt

• -