The Sun.
London, England, 1827-11-21 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.—(THIS DAY)
• COURT OF CHANCERY.
A WARD. tbi
A gentleman behind the bar observed, riot
was the day on which his Lordship had orulfith
gentleman to appear in Court who had collie
e Ward whom he.had married, and that he Pjon
to pray, at the instance of those on whose
the ,Court had originally acted, that the aPPeI,
in Court of the gentleman, might be dispetrivoto
and that the' parties might be at liberty ogi
the Master's office to have a settlement aPPL.°I",
Another junior Counsel appeared for other
and approved of this proposed arrangement,°
Court ordered. •
MR. WELLESLEY AND HIS CHILDOO
wELLEsr..Er V. LUK OF BEAUFORT' I
Mr. PEPYS opened this.petition presenteu
Misses Long ; from which it appeared, th:
Wellesley had on the 15th inst. gone to .te"(I
desired to see his boys; that Dr. Deere in
Dobson not having felt themselves justinv"oolv.;
fusing, without the direct order of the Couthhe
the interview ; that then Mr. W. took t"ttlierl'
from the school into Windsor, where he Itt;eoC
Derr
.from twelve to four o'clock. The pet'';,;:lfrt:
prayed, that Mr. Wellesley might be t"-
seeing or having any further intercourse "Ive
children, except in the presence of a Proper
to be appointed by the Master for that P"re-t5l .0(
1-liS LORDSHIP, before Mr. Pepys got -
e so
davits, observed that in consequence of iinh bi°:
and severe -illness of Mi. Pittman, I,lo'
obliged to retire from the tutorship of the c-Itee
in consequence they had been left without 3'
and therefore, by the advice of Dr. Keate, tbe V,i,00
had been returned to ,the care of the Alisseso,/
until another private tutor could be appeill,bttV,
Under these circumstances, the Court tho'li' th
best thing to he done was, that the order elad,io
been made on Saturday should fall to the grai°
petition be withdrawn, • and no order be al""e't
Mr. PEPYS' only apprehension was, th6o",,te
Misses Long would be left exposed to 3 C
with Mr. Wellesley, who might at their oloof
insist on seeing his children, which right hit
_,L the bar -contended he had. t
entereditlr.
into, HORNSh
said
had n
, if tohisobsjtin sort of aLt ai;t .saye,e,
lable on this occasion.-
His Loßbinip said the children were nesvd
the exclusive care of the . Misses Long' Iliade,
without their permission Mr.' Wellesley o 0;
loiugtlatgteo,
tsi
ee
lathwemwo;uilfd
inti
Mr. PEPYS was
quite hpersoatstchi cs.°at:tithdi enb.l retell .iige s
Lion from the Court. -tY
to
His Lonnsuw added, that- when another ei
was appointed, the children would be retur°o(te`4
his custody to Eton, and that he would Petitie
them from from: all improper visits. The P f
was then withdrawn, and the interim order

turday,set aside.
COOK V. COLLIN RIDGY, 00 till
The COURT ordered in this ease that it sPtid,fiiv
back to the Master, to'whom it stood reface";
directions that We should proceed to sell thew rA
making business, agreeably 'to an order t'l.detc'
been made by Lord Eldon, whereby it was tc,
that the particulars of sale should con for elti
amount of the profits made in the business goes o
last three or four years, together with the Otiberli
the customers, and that all parties should be at
to bid.
LUNATIC PETITIONS. t se'
The COURT went through the lunacies tli3 tlot
in the paper which "were of cow se, and t"h
„oisiea otit
happened to be opposed Were ordered to
,till the regular petition day.
BROWN V. MC TASTEr. Ser'
The. COURT ordered, in this case, that t"ee
on the clerk in Court should be good serViC
ith
the motion being renewed. &dor
The COURT then took motionsond prose
the part heard one of Furnival and Bogle'

VICE- CHANCELLOR'S COCB:r.„6 ifiAbe
Ills HONOUR disposed of sevel al to"- sod'.
course of the morning, none of which posse
features of general interest.

~;.11N
COURT OF KING'S ..',4- cit
. • , '
It having been understO°d
(Sittings in,Thiac°;.'
s.o''' ,ed
THE K.ING• V. , .
Apostle of Deism *as to
apparelled as beforein 5. ie le
been evinced at the Re-le into
tone desire was manifered
ment this morning, the
to obtain a c:Ntt, as had ,
took
bro.rhttohihsuTigtaKl seaty ht i
o uregi
nip,
scoß7vioe eocilevv:wr
le! riee li e .
militaryCOor3u ti•otl.a' st
cloak,
ten
koa: cpB,ll:aoe,pc:kr:,•:o:piti
ttileo4eMc
under the bench
THE KING V. MARY SOMERTON. Ifeglield
Bu
Mary Somerton was tried at the last Ass,',l"-r•aps
aat
ri
slo'anterrn :vial ,s annodwccoanl:eicdteudpo:tshteeajluindrnaer::::
gold brooch, and some artificial ewers t-,-, -e
(1`
perty of Joseph
tence having been
Ellie'', upon which sett `The
transportation for 11 years was passed on her' A seer
writ of error. brought into this Cot
.i. sob'
Mr. Sergeant 1.,
mitted that the = 3.IPUS in support ( f the vvr ow,
indictment was not sufficient tete'
rant the judgment of the court, which had he;oell
carded against the prisoner. The Learned 0°-
objectins were strictly technical. once
Mr. JEREMY was heard in support of the sell
and judgment. to $,5
Lord TENTERDEN said, that if the y were 0,0,
rest the judgment on the ground stated, they ''' cot
render themselves obnoxious to the reflectienyB
upon the administration of justice many years ag°,,te
learned and humane judge, who said it was A digglidy
g
to the law, that criminals should escape from Pecl
ment through nice and captious objections t° t
r
nical irregularities in the pleadings.
11tde*
The other Judges concurred' w
in this vie,"
judgment was confirmed.
}Jsaisa v. CiAMENT. jell's
This was an action for a libel published in and
Lifebrought an action against Stockdale, the Ini,1)01116
in London. Mr. Fisher is an attoregiisber
of " Harriet Wilson, ' of which a report, Avlt'l,4oll)er
observations annexed, appeared in the next Pl'iviog
of Bell's Lye
.in London. Mr. Fisher concebt so
this report injurious to his character, broligi•etof
action for libel against Mr. Clement, the 1.34:e15 c'
of Ben Life in London, and recovered daroog-rt of
romthetoj
the amount of 50/. The judgment of the 0:015
now E
itappealed
delivered f
Common Pleas, in which the action was triewirs;
was, that the judgment of the Court Of Coollto ft
Pleas should be reversed, and the case 013 - •
new Jury. udtigliteneCnotuorft,thaendcoltAtertr,do,lioiorllll

THE KING V. °REAVES. fit fer
Abraham Greaves was brought up for judgale at
assulting and obstructing William Charlton'
officer of Excise, in the exercise of his duty f the
Mr. Justice BAYLEY having read his noteslioa•
trial, the defendant put in an affidavit in midi of
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said the ass6llooo'
which the defendant was convicted, was 1181)0e
serious one, and it was very important that r_c• the
officers should be, protected in the dischale
duty which the law cast upon them. the
In cdnsideration of all the circumstance; tor
Court ordered the prisoner to be confined in ail
caster Gaol for three months, and to give see
for good behaviour for three years.
t 3,1
[Lp
rorer.sdildiTao
yealtoti tret,
hrsde casee
sni
ti
stands
tgawithdrewnadtsp Nisisoono sptpt.
onasef tdoetrsito:teitei
loiii,eloll,l4

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
(Sitting" in Banco.)
WILTON V. DAVIES. 00,461 A
In this case Mr. Sergeant MERU/T.oOn Gel
for a rule to show cause why the proceedineliv,
b
not be stayed, till the costs of a former tru oht 10
discharged. The original action was r°l4