The Sun.
London, England, 1842-08-31 00:00:00

IN RE CATHARINE MARIA FORDE.

The insolvent in this case was Miss Forde, the well-
known and favourite actress. The amount of debts

appearing ill her schedule was very large, but all
10,..1e4.1* 14110".,,rtypitired to Liu:Oily fi)r, was 35/.
"being 'doable the amount' of a small judgment debt
against her. Her vesting order was dated.. nearly a
month back. .;4

Mr. Lewis, the insolvent's solicitor, stated to the
Learned Commissioner
.that `W. His: had been paid
into Court, and also 22 duplicates, handed over to Mr.,
Caffe, the auctioneer,, to the Court.
Mr. Commissioner ITAaRts said, under those cir-
cumstances, he should now accept bail, when the in-
solvent might be liberated after filing an amended
balance sheet. . _
- Messrs. Layton and Fox having, qualified were ke.
cepted as bail, and Miss Forde.was. liberated, after the'
order of the Court was complied with.

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT.
OLD C0t1)?T.

(Wore Mr. Baron ROLFE.)
ROBBERY WITH VIOLENCE, AND THREATENING TO
MAKE AN INDECENT CHARGE.—Charles Fitzgererld,
aged 25, was indicted for committing a robbery, at-
tended with violence, on: the person of a man named
Watts, in the month of May last: ,
It appeared that the prosecutor was looking, on the
evening in question, into a print-shop in the Strand,
-when the prisoner came up to him and told him he
had some' prints and books to dispose of, which were
valuable, and asked the prosecutor to become a purn.
chaser... The prosecutor, stated. that it was not likely
he would be a purchaser, but that if the prisoner
wished, he would look at them 41e accordingly went
with the prisoner to his lodgings in Stanhope-street,
where he resided, an Al as soon as begot
prioner seized the prosecutor, shook him, tore his
clothes, and, threatened tO•aceaSe him of an indecent
assault if he 'did nOt give him 'Money.
,Prosecutor
gave him a shilling and some 'halfpence, and as soon
as he got into the street, seeinga policeman, he gave
the prisoner into custody., The prosecutor was sub:

sequently taken ill, and confined
.to Bartholomew's
Hospital for two months, which accounted for the de.-%
lay which had taken place in bringing the prisoner to
trial.*
Mr. Baron Ti.OLFE.' in summing up, expressed a
doubt as fo'whether the violence committed was suiit.
de la to support the charge *of robbery with violence.
. The Jury, found the prisoner. Guilty of robbery,
attended with; violence. The prisoner was then re-
moved'untiLthe next trial should have taken place.
Ma. Cniatenii.i.'s CASE.-Win. Stringer, alias
Fitzgerald' alias Mills, and. Charles Newstead alias
Smith alias Nell Gwynv, were indicted for assaulting
Mr. J. E. Churchill, with intent to rob him, on the
llth of the present month. The prisoners pleaded
:Not Guilty.

CaRKSON, in opening the case to the Jury,

assault with intent to commit a robbery committed
by two persons, and an assault committed with that
intent by one person only. It would, therefore, be
for the jury to determine whether the two prisoners
had conspired together to make an assault
for the purpose of robbing, not Mr. Churchill par-
ticularly, but any person they might happen to meet.
The Learned Counsel thf.n proceeded to detail the
facts of the case as they afterwards appeared in evi-
dence. He invited the most searching investigation
into the evidence he should offer, and besought them
narrowly to watch every word that fell from Mr.
Churchill.
The witnesses on both sides were ordered out of
Court.

The prisoner Stringer said that he had only been
committed on Friday, and was without legal advice ;
he trusted no prejudice would exist against him. .
Mr. John Ellis Churchill examined by Mr. Bon-
KIN-4 am in the employment of Ellis and Evrington,
in St. Paul's Church-yard, and I am the nephew
of Mr. Wynn Ellis, one of the partners,
I lodge at 44, Great Marlborough-street. On the
evening of Thursday, llth of the month, I went out to
take a walk in Hyde Park, at about nine o'clock. I
am in the habit of walking in the Park of an evening,
as I am detained in the City by business until seven
in the evening. I was so detained on the day in
question. I was going from Grosvenor-gate, in the
direction of Kensington-gardeng". After I had got
about 300 yards, I turned to the right, and was then
in the direction towards Oxford-street. The prisoner
Newstead then overtook me, and touching his hat
asked me politely the nearest road to the City. His
appearance was most respectable. He stated that he
had been spending the day at Kensington. I told
him the road that I was going was the most direct
way. We walked on together about 20 or 30 yards,
wheat I heard some one coming behind. On looking round
I saw the prisoner Stringer coming towards us. He
seized me by the collar, called me a d—d beast, and
said I had been guilty of indecently exposing my
person. I raised my stick, with a view of knocking
him down, when the other prisoner seized my arm,
and said you had better go quietly to the station-
house. I remarked that if there were two of them
it was useless my resisting, and proceeded as a pri-
soner with Stringer to Oxford-street. Newstead fol-
lowed behind. We went down Park-lane to one of
the streets leading to Grosvenor-square. Stringer
observed that he had been watching me for the
last three-quarters of an hour, and added further
that my friend, meaning Newstead, kept close
behind me. I requested Stringer, as he seemed
determined to take me to the station, to let
me go to my house in the neighbourhood, that
I migh ttake some friend with me. 'We proceeded
down Lower Brook-street, a contrary direction to the
station. He asked me what security I would give
him if he allowed me to, go into my house. I said
what security can you require if you see me to my
door ? Opposite to Mivart's Hotel I saw a police-
man in the distance. I said to Stringer it will
soon be settled by a policeman. He then said you
shall not go to your lodgings, you shall go to the sta-
tion-house. He immediately turned back, and
changed our direction, for the purpose, as it seemed, of
avoiding the policeman. We went towards Davis-
street—there we met a body of police. I remarked,
the police are coming towards us, and the prisoner
Stringer immediately stopped. The prisoner New-
stead had disappeared when I first saw the policeman.
The police approached. I said we will go towards
them. He crossed the road, and seized my collar,
dragging me as though I were a prisoner towards
them. On coming up to the police he gave me in
charge for an indecent assault, and stated to the In-
spector that if he went back a little -way he would
probably find the other fellow. I was taken to the
station-house, the charge made, the Inspector read the
charge to me, and I was locked up in a cell. I asked
twice for writing materials, and requested a messenger
to be sent to my friends. No notice was taken of
my request. On the next morning I was taken to
Marlborough-street, and the charge was gone into.
(The depositions then taken at Marlborough-street
were then put in and read by the clerk, they have al-
ready been published.) After the examination I was
committed as a prisoner, and remained locked up
until I procured bail. One of my bail knew Mr.
Shepherd, in whose service the prisoner Stringer
alias Fitzgerald had represented himself to be. Mr.
Shepherd was fetched, and confronted with Stringer. I
was not present then, but by the advice of the Magis-
trates' clerk, I gave Stringer in custody on a charge of
assault. (Mr. Fitzpatrick, the clerk at Marlborough-
street, here stated what occurred on Mr. Shepherd
coming to the office. It appeared that the Magistrate
sent for Stringer, that Mr. Shepherd was confronted
with him, when Stringer admitted that what he had
sworn in the morning, that he was in the employ of
Shepherd or Sutton, was false. He also stated that he
knew Mr. Shepherd, but he did not see him in Court,
although Mr. Shepherd was in Court. Stringer had
stated in the morning that he had been obliged to ask
Mr. Shepherd's leave to attend the office. After he
came back in the evening, before he knew Mr. Shep-
hetd was in the office, the clerk asked him if he per-
.

NEW COURT.
(Before the COMMON SERGEANT.)
John Hughes, 18, described in the calendar as a
shoemaker, was convicted of stealing six knives, six
forks, and one spoon value 31., the property of Colonel
Henderson, and sentenced to six months' imprison-
ment and hard labour.

Benjamin Pedigree, 17, was indicted with stealing
a pair of boots, the property of Charles Wright, from
the person of James Wright.
The Jury convicted the prisoner, and
The COURT, he having been formerly convicted,
sentenced him to ten years' transportation.
George Henry Lyne, James Wright, and William

sisted in saying that he was in the employnient
of Shepherd and Sutton. He said he did.
. The clerk asked if one of the parties could
i be got to attend if,
_he WaS sent for. He said it would
. be no use, for the office was shut, and they were
. gone to Camberwell. He did not come in the morn-
ing until after his time. The clerk asked what was
the cause of the delay, and he said he had had great
difficulty in getting leave from his employers.
Mr. Churchill's examination resumed—After the
account Stringer had given at Marlborough-street, I
gave hini in charge for an assault upon me, and he
was taken to the station-house. I was going away.
He said to me, " You shall have Newstead before you
in the morning, the man you were indecently engaged
with in the Park." I have seen him this afternoon.
That was the first time that I heard the name Newstead
mentioned. On my oath I had not been in company with
Newstead one minute when Stringer came. On my
oath there is not one word of truth in the charge.
In answer to questions from the prisoner Stringer,
the witness, Mr. Churchill, in the most solemn manner
denied that there was the least particle of truth in the
charge which Stringer made, or that he had ever
offs•o•ed Stringer money to let him go.
Charles Wallis examined by Mr. Cniinissoet—l am
a dentist, living at 44, Great Marlborough-street. I
am' a friend of Mr. ,Churchill, and was with him when
he gave ,the -charge against the prisoner Fit4geridel
alias Stringer.' 'Whilst 'there 1 heard Stringy say.,
Inellaeing/YAUlit. elfilTqllill, ‘, I will bring up, Neils--
stead to-morrow, the man you were with in-the'Vetyke -
r rnielfAit h him hys'iccitlentsihie afternoon, and he. stAl 1
he ‘ • d'coniel"•: ' '
- ' tross-examined. by Stringer—l can positivelyttri I
that -said Newstead. •
11,4rst'Lister, police constable C 14—I was at fli"e,
stathii-ilthuse when Mr. Churchill - made his charge.
This7settliess corroborated the testimony of Mr.
Churqh.l.ll- as to ',the :-• use' Of the name Newstead :by
Strinkir., ! • • .- - .
Ell 'thorn—l%: 'the, daughter of Mr. Their u; '
15, Degfieell-street, Clare-market. It is close to Stlin-'!
.hope-stet. Stisinger lodged at my mother's hens&
Another man lodged with him in the samesrieztrii.
(C. Fitzgerald was here placed at the bar.) That is
the man. They pasSed as brothers. Newstead was in
the habit of calling there. He and Stringer often
went out !together. Newstead was there just before
Striiidee 'Vas taken ihtci custody.
Cross-examined. by.Stringer—He used to call on
you about four o'clock in the afternoon. ''' '
By-the COURT—They used to come in very late at•
night:
William: Thorn—l am the brother of the last wit-
ness/ Is„remember Stringer taking the lodging.
Chalrfe's7itig•erald came about a week after. They
lived% the house together. They passed as brothers.
• : Ftederick -Clark—l live in Broad-street, ,Gelden-
_spare. I know the two men at the bar. I saw them
together on the night of the 11th of August 'about I,
sie'clockrat Char:ng•cross.
.. (..
~'Zoesaleetamined by, Stringer—l am ati engineer. ,I -- __ -
POLICE ANTLIATJGENCE. .1
have livdd its Broad-street more than a year.
; T ',re ,(*TeSERDAY.)
..4.9tilfg,hr--\--Dicl you ever break open a : box end -
Cottsoene letters in HoWland-street? WitneSS--,-No. : s . :11/4eNS,WeVeHO NV-HOUSE. , • ,
A Nov AkPLICAMION.—Janice and..Benja7
4'llStiirrAkir=—Suppose I were to produce the person to t-;iie Ball, tsvo men lately employed by Me. Thom
:swinem! yousspledged the letters. Witnese—Do so if
:Williams, whalebone cutter, of.:Cheapside, appeared be-
eeee •
Gijon7; can. - fore the Lorplayor, and .stated :that they had been in
...p., .. .
elo. witness continued—l had a gold . watch and Mr. Williatusi'eserviee, for about five months.: On-Friday
llPTitireisgria4aideeelpell. I pledged the ring, and t last, Me. Williams cause into- the shop, and he fbund
14'-:‘;',.(n 4.ltio* asii*leaother pledged the- watch. some Iverlc diets was !yang unfinished. He said nothing
' ""cite ,eeof my watch "Nit;s-Solleto my. landlady. about the worlabisteitaide to the, applicants, h Make out
: ' Ptione-rs•—•Did you not offer es sell tfie dugleato-eyour account% lidisehargeotou.'"Jeliey tirade out their
-4tAtin to Mr. Bell ? Witness—l did not. • I never PQc-bult4l----". 4111litit.taPPlit.,,dsit-e-nes*„. 414eRanneto :give
;altered a duplicate from 2s. to 21. ,' .. , a : 'them asichfliaale, I,I',IiNYIS*I-oecktoOrio.',., 7., '';
111 Villianis saidttliaL , on. Errtidy hist! he. was gic,inc,
The witness furtheretated that he recollected meet
'Up stairs into the' shop, and' 'he' heard a; voice. ay "linsh.s"
Ins; Stringer shortly before he was taken into custody,
• lie went into the room, and he there -saw the alicants.
but denied telling prisoner he could get him 2001. if he: he d' • athat had
Uader`an old jacket discovered some work
Would go to Ilollend ; that he saw the prisoner aieo been secreted, and thinking it looked rather suspicious,
on the Friday before he was in custody. 'There was and as the work was in a state in which it ought not to
a quarrel, and witness said that if he could transport be, he gave the applicants their discharge.
the pair of them he would do it, in order to put a stop The Loan MAI on said that there was certainly sof-
to their abominable practices. - ficient ground of suspicion for Mr. Williams to be juste-
. . Thomas Plume :was calledhy the prosecutor, for tha,e-fieed ill. i',l dug theta tlitie• .4ise.tsareresesbut lie-could not .
purpose of giving the prisoner an opportunity of compel im to give the applicants a character. The
njuaszt
J thereforeoi,n Wlon dismissed.s,teh i
cross-examining him—My name is Thomas Plume. summons
ese ii
I gave my name to Mr. Churchill, as Thomas Davis. e et Step/:ens, and
Joseph Lawton, four men also in the service of Mr.
I know the prisoners at the bar. Williams, were then put forward charged with assault-
On his cross-examination by Stringer, the witness lag the applicants in the last case, Brown and Ball.
stated that he was in company with him on the This case arose out of the transaction detailed above.
Thursday before Stringer was taken into custody ; It appeared that Brown and Ball went tosthe shop yes-
that .Clark was present, but that he did not hear terday, about twelve o'clock, and a regular row took
Clark saw anything about 2001. or going to Holland. place. All the parties stripped, and a severe conflict
Mr. W. Shepherd—l am a stationer in Foster- took place. Mr. tihilliarns was in the shop at the time,
lane, in partnership with Mr. Sutton. Charles Fitz- and in the scuffle he received a severe blow on the lip.
The LORD MAYOR said the best thing he could do
gerald was in my employment. He quitted it five
I would be to bind the whole of the men overs the
years since. The man Stringer was never in my ser-
eace towards each other, and lti rto
WilliamsVe'vice. He never had any communication whatever Peace
take the men Brown' and- Ballap into 'his l service l
with me on the subject of this charge. again, as it was a sad thing for men to be thrown out of
W. Plume, inspector of the C division of police--I work with a stain on their character.
took the charge against Mr. Churchill made by Mr. Williams said he would do-so.
Stringer, and told Stringer that he must appear next The parties then left the Court.
day at Marlborough-street Police Court. He said he GUILDHALL.
would appear, but he must first ask his employers' John Hallett, a butcher's man, was placed at the bar
leave, and that they lived' in Foster-lane in the City. ' charged on suspicion of having stolen a bundle of fat.
Cross-examined by Stringer—l never said to you Inspector Death stated that he saw the prisoner take
that I was satisfied of M a bundle into the tap of Mr. Teesdale, a publican, re-
he had said to you. r. Churchill's guilt from what 2
: siding in. the neighbourhood of Newgate-street, and
I leave it there. The witness went into the house, lend
Mr. CLARKSON—Is there one word of truth in that found concealed, behind a barrel, a large parcel of fat.
suggestion ? Witness —Not one word, Sir. The prisoner was then found, and taken into custody.
This was the case for the prosecution. Mr. Alderman JOHNSON said he should discharge the
Stringer, in his defence, repeated the charge which 1 prisoner, but he directed the house of Mr. Teesdale to
he had made against Mr. Churchill, and declared that be examined, as he believed it to be the receptable of
it was true, and that Mr. Churchill had offered him stolen goods, and the case would be borne in mind at the
his money and his gold-headed cane to let him go, next licensing day.
and declared he would accuse Mr. Churchill to the BOFV-STIiEE7.
day of his death. He acknowledged that he had a Matthew Stevenson, who had been remanded froth this
Court for the production of further evidence, on the
bad character, and that he had been previously con-
charge of embezzling. a large sum of money, the property.
victed, but still he told truth with regard to Mr.
of Mr. Henry Slater, upholsterer, of 22, Queen's-build-
Churchill.
in es, Maryle bone, was this day placed at the bar on th e same
Newstead, in his defence, denied all knowledge of , 1.
together with his brother Wm; Stevenson, who
roved
he transaction, and attributed the situation in which ' bedcharged with being accessary. It will be remembered
he was placed to the malice of the witness Clark. by the readers of 7'he Sun, that the prisoner Matthew
Mr. Baron ROLFE, in summing up, said that this had been upwards of four years in the employ of the
was a prosecution under the Act of 1837, to which prosecutor as porter, and that on the 10th of August
he had before alluded, and the question for the Jury to the prosecutor gave him a cheque for 671. 17s. 7d. upon
decide was, whether this was a case in which two the London and Westminster Bank, the cash for which
persons had agreed together, and had committed an he was to receive, and return to Mr. Slater. The prisoner
peohvehd to have chashed tfhe cheque, but instead of return-
assault with intent to rob. If the Jury were of was
opinion that Stringer and Newstead seized and Thge s helplesse. statelndofsodmroeol
drunkenness, throwing
i e.n
,
assaulted Mr. Churchill in the Park, for the purpose r‘trteetts ine mey
the money about in all directions ; and so freely had It
of endeavouring to frighten him into giving them made use of it that by far the greater portion of it was
money, then it would be an assault within the mean- gone.
ing of the statute. If they should be of opinion that Mr. Slater repeated his evidence relative to theprisoner
the assault was committed by Stringer alone, with- Matthew, and merely stated, with regard to William,
out the consent or assistance of Newstead, for the that he was a brother of the other prisoner's.
purpose of frightening Mr. Churchill into giving Charles Scholefield, a clerk in the London and West-
him money, then the offence would be a very serious minister Bank, deposed to paying the cheque in question
to the prisoner Matthewfi on the 10th of August, which
offence, but not of so serious a nature as if two were
nevdenotes and. thirty-seven pounds
concerned in it. The Learned Judge then went he paidts with i
ct
hh i
isixi
ingsvea-ipidous ripe rice in gold and silver. .
through the evidence, commenting on it as he went seventeen
John Liston, the keeper of wine vaults in
along. 2, Picquet-street, produced a five-pound note, which he
The Jury without hesitation returned a verdict of believed to have been paid to him by the prisoner Wil-
Guilty against both prisoners. Liam on the evening of the 10th August.—(The note was
The verdict was received with demonstrations of produced and identified as one of those given by the
applause, which were, however, instantly checked by witness Scholefield, to the other prisoner in exchange for
the officers of the Court. the cheque.) When Witness changed the note the per-
Stringer was again indicted for having been pre- sun presenting it gave the name ot" Stevenson," of No.
viously convicted of felony. 6, Essex-street.
The record of the previous conviction of William William Batty was in the public-house on the 10th of
August, and further identified
iWilliam Stevenson as
Stringer for felony, and of his having been sentenced
being the man who changed the 5/. note above mentioned
to seven years' transportation, was then produced and
proved. on that day.
Henry Barker was in Kilpack's wine-vaults in the
Eliza Fitzgerald, the mother of Charles Fitzge- Strand, on the 10th of August, and he saw the prisoner
raid, was examined, and swore that Stringer was no Matthew Stevenson give to William a Si. note, and tell
relative of herself or of her son. She heard the pri- him to go and get it changed.
soner Stringer tried at the Surrey Sessions for felony. Policeman I? 23 repeated his evidence of a former
John 'Wilton, who lives in Castle-lane, Southwark, day relative to the apprehension of Matthew Stevenson,
identified Stringer as the person previously tried and and the finding on him 45/. ss. 114 d.
convicted of stealing a purse containing seven shil- The prisoner Matthew admitted having given his bro-
lings, and sentenced to seven
years' trans portation , timer a note toino.
gefttheh,arnoeshetld, but denied that his brother
and Inspector Plume deposed that at Marlborough- k nle%ay i
iiiiin,,,
it ideided all knowledge of the robbery.
street, when the prisoner Stringer was examined, he Both the prisoners were fully committed for trial.
stated that he had nothing to say. CLERKEIVIYELL.
The Jury returned that they found Stringer had The Rev. Thomas Boddington, lase chaplain to Gilt-
been before convicted. spur-street Compter, and Mrs. Matilda Tippet were
Mr. Baron ROLFE, in passing sentence, told the charged with violently assaulting Frederick Penn
prisoners that they had been convicted on the clearest I Tippet, commercial traveller, Charlotte-place, Thornhill-
evidence of a robbery of the foulest description. bridge, Islington.
There could be no doubt of the falsehood of the charge The Bench has been occupied the greater part of Mon.-
which they had made against Mr. Churchill. In this (lay and yesterday in hearing this extraordinary case.
case there was clearly a most diabolical conspiracy on The female prisoner was only present on Monday. On
the part of the prisoners, and therefore he should sen-
that evening a warrant was issued for the Rev. prisoner,
tense them—Stringer to transportation for life, and
and he was apprehended at half-past eleven o'clock that
Newstead to transportation for fifteen years.
night by a constable in coloured clothes, at his residence,
No. I, York-street, City-road.
The prisoner Charles Fitzgerald was then placed at The facts of the case as deposed to are these. The
the bar, and sentenced to transportation for fifteen years. Rev. Mr. Boddington was six years chaplain to Giltapur-
street Compter. Three years ago the female prisoner
was committed there fur robbing ready furnished lodg-
ings. He went to the prosecutrix, who, at his earnest
intercession, had her released. She was then taken to the
Rev. Gentleman's own house, where she continued to act
as governess till May last. Two years ago the com-
plainant was introduced to Mr. Boldington at the Crown
Tavern, St. John-street. An intimacy occurred. Last
April the Rev. Gentleman wrote to complainant, who
was then on business in the country, to come to town,
alleging that he would procure for him a Government
situation, if not some other lucrative one. The com-
plainant resigned his situation, and hastened to town.
The Rev. Gentleman, on his arrival, Sold him the Go-
vernment situation was lost, but that, if he would ac-
company him to Sydney, he would provide for him, if
he agreed to marry his governess, Miss Miller. She

147'7' -
Sadd, were convicted of stealing a `lialf-croW'
some halfpence, the property of Charles Re 2,14-
the'person of Charlotte Realif. . ,
Ile prisoners having all been previou446ii,
. .
were sentenced to ten years' transportation.
William Dean,' 27, a labourer, was convicted of
stealing 155., the property of Robert Mays.
The COURT (the prisoner having been previously
convicted) sentenced him to seven years' trans-
portation.
John Burns and James Smith, the one a labourer
and the other. a sweep, were convicted of stealing a
pair of boots and
.socks," the property of G-Oorge
Stokoe, and sentenced tb four months' imprisonMent
and hard labour. •
John Ilubbard, a bricklayer, was convicted of steal-
ing a piece of stone, value Is., the property of Thos.
Cubitt, and sentenced to 'three months' imprisonment
and hard labour.
Amelia Gates, aged 19, was convicted of stealing a
mouseline de laine dress, value 145., the property of
Samuel Hughes, and sentenced to six months'
imprisonment.
Wm. John- Sham, a sailor, aged 16; was convicted of
stealing one pair of trousers, a shirt, and a cap, value
55., and money to the amount of 75., the property of
Frederick Cooper.
The prisoner having been previously convicted; was
Sentenced by the Court to seven years' transportation.
George Richards, a blue maker, was convicted of
stealing, on the 18th of August, at a Chartist meet-
ing on Islington-green, a pocket handkerchief from
the person of Henry Hall, and sentenced to one month's
imprisonment and hard labour.
The COURT refused to allow the prosecutor hiS ex-
penses, observing that if he chose to attend such theet-
in„..o-s he must abide by the consequences. '
MURDER.—Our readers will recollect, that
on Saturday last, Sarah Stroud was convicted the
murder of her own child, by throwing it into the; Re-
gent's Canal, and sentenced to death, the Learned
Judge holding out no hopes of mercy. Since, the
conviction of the prisoner, Mr. Doane, her Counsel,
has appealed to the Learned Judge who tried'her it
f
(Mr. Baron Rolfe) to stay execution, on the ground
of an irregularity as to the baptismal 14411-De of the
child. it% e finders:4llcl, .414043.seuelAMOritits;
cation, the Tear tied NNT4NI 'ld the &ere-
.
taty'of State IO stay ex,o-a7w.Ailit ovember, in order
.that the- point TaiiS:.,.d.bs-44.,IsiAiti-ixekeqfpso tin:y be
C.:64i:si'dere by the_Judges,:..3,
‘i 4
, . • siaNTE4Ws. - • ,
the...termination:4 the:4;aitsions, a great nu siber of
convicts were brought urt to neueivejudgment. •Thts fols
lnwing,list contains the.names and sentence of the more
egrogieus
Sentenced to,Death.—Sarah•Stioud, for infanticide.
. Sentence of -Dearth Recorded.—Gedrge White and J.
•
Banishment.for Smith, J. Whittle, G. White,
Serihger.okas Fitzgerald.
! _
"For Fifteen years.,Henry.;:Taylor, J. Wilson, C.
Newstead, J. Norman,. and Ctailes Fitverald.
Foulteen Years.,---Geo.KF.Awards, Geo. Gifford,
Sarlth Ann Hunt, and J:
r. For Ten Years.—J. Connell, J. Lyon, T. Sable, Julia
ls,Eurphy, Ed. Thonnts,,J. Eedle, T. Cooper, 13. Pedigree,
.T. Taylor, G. Lee. 11. Tyler, J. Robinson, Ed. Howell,
J.!Flora, Jaliti MidfOrd, .Brid: Armstrong,
'Alen Gwynn, G. H. Lyne, Ellen Reason, J. Wright,
J. Yenatdes,Aa&,J,ane Wilson..
For Seven YearE,--John Pitts, G. Evans. J. Small,
:T. FUSQn, 4,1;.113; iliican, Power, J. Murray, It. Brooke,
W. Dearr, E. Gurney, S. Dickenson, J. Winningtdn, C.
Ile/Hera, Alnh 1-leynerlds,.Geo.:Toivoley„ I'. Leather T.
Leader, Sarah. cnniberi-!EiLatheth. Greenfield, J. Sep-
haul, 4.- Sanders, J. Y4.',"Shaw- Thompson, W. Allen
,a/esits:Grcsn, • J. Hootoa..
In.atldition to these., .not less f..than kone +unfired and
sixty persons were sentenced to periods Of imprisonttent,
•varying.frotn: three years to, two months. The (hurt, at•
US rising, adjourned till Monday,• the 26th ofleptem-
ber next. - .

- 17,

5,
~~