The Sun.
London, England, 1820-02-07 00:00:00

UNIVERSITY INTELLIGENCE.

OXFORD, FEB 2 —al Thursday last the fol-
lowing degrees were confei red :

J) "'tor ire 3fellif rues Ailey Ugly, of Trinity College.

Master of "Irtt —Rev. John Stedman, Pembroke College;
James Halt, Wadham College; Samuel Pepys Cockerell, Fel-
low of Merton. College; William Arundell Bouverie, Fellow
of lertou College; Rev. Robert Crawford Dillon, St. Ed-
mund's Hall.

Bachelors Qt. Arls.—William Baron, Esq., Wadham Col-
lege, grand Compounder; Charles Anthony Hunt, Merton
Collcrt; Gringo Parter Cleather, Exeter Coilege ; David
Dundas, Student of Christ Church; Thomas Law hard, Stu-
dent of Christ Church; Henry Parsons, Scholar of Balliol
College. _ . .

Yesterday the Rev. Edward John Burrow, M. A. of Trinity
Coltcze, was admitted Bacliel6r in Divinity, Grand Cou►-
pouuder.

- - -
REGISI Ell OF FASHION.

FAsmoNaBLE A atuvAts.—Captain de C. BroOlce, at Bru-
net's Hotel: the Reverend S. Hodson, and Mts. Hodson and
Family, at Marshal Thompson's New Hotel, from Wadeautt
House, Thrapston, Northamptonsliire.
DEpAturnaEs.—The Honourable Captain Robert. Rodney,
and Mn.e Rodney, from Marshal Thompson's New Hotel, to
Lord Rodney's, Old AlreNfoid, Hants.

CITY OF OXFORD.—IO consequence of en ap-
plication haviog been made in the early part of
last seek to Mr. WETHERELL, requesting him to
become a Candidate for the Representation of the
City of Oxford, an answer was received from that
Gentleman complying with rite request, and de-
clarine his intentions accordingly. Ot► Saturday
evening a eepntation of the Freemen waited on
Mr. WETHERULL, at his residence in Stone-
buildings, for the purpose of making the requisite
preparations for an immediate active canvass.
They yesterday left town for that purpose.—Mr.
WRIGHT, Dr. LUSH INGTON, Mr. LOCKHART, and
General SAINT JOH N have also offered themselves,
and a spirited contest is anticipared.
Mr. DOWDESWELL, M. I'. a barrister of time
Chancery bar, is appointed a Master in Chancery,
vice Mr. CAMNIRLE, promoted to the office of
Accountant-General, vice SMITH, deceased.

The City of Dublin, we understand, will be
fiercely contested. It is said that Mr. GRATTAN
means to decline —(Dublin Evening Poet, Feb, 3.)
The Commissioners of the Victualling Board
are to be increased by the addition of the
.Gover-
nors of the Naval Hospitals at Hasfdr, near .Ports-
mouth, and at Plymouth. This. arrangement, it
is said, will'not be accomprittea by any additional
expence to the countr:;. Captain GARAETT, of
the Victualling depot at Deptford, is amointed to
"Perillt.en,(l the ilospit al at Elaslar, and connnis-
sioner of Coe Victualling Board, in the room of
Cap' ::171 CRAVEN and Captain CREYKE : the Go-
vernor at Plymouth is the other new Commis.
sinner. Captain J. HILL succeeds Captain Gaff,
REIT at Deptford.
A rumour is just now in circulation that Mr.
KINLocn, of Kinloch, has made up matters with
Government, and is about to- return to his native
country.—(Montrose Paper.)
CORN-EXCHANGE, FEB. 7.—The supply . of
Wheat was rather small this morning, and from
the dampness of the weather, the major part of
samples front -E4Sex, Kent, and Suffolk, were
rough in hand, and on that 'account did not .sell
so briskly as on Friday; but still the general runs
fetched last Monday's prices, and picked samples
of White obtained per varier more than on
this day week. I hie malting Barley- sold readily
at last Monday's prices but there is little or no
demand for any other descriptions. Oats, Peas,
and Beans, were 'dull sale, but no cheaper than
last week.

Smtni-FIELD,Fas./.—The market this morning
had but a middling supply of all kind of Cattle,
in consequence of which Berf, and all other ar-
ticles are higher in price. Veal, Mutton, and
Pork, have also advanced in price;
A SUNIM ER CU RIOSITY.-.--.We 'have been shown
this mornilg, by a Correspondent, a living But-
terfly, k.nol,vn among Naturalists by the name of
the LeopArd. Some part of its wings were in full
colour; but from its fluttering when taken off the
ground yesterday, at Kentish Town, the outer
wings appeared to have suffered from friction. '
On Monday se'nnight, the Doke ot WELLING-
TON was shooting with other Noblemen and
Gentlemen at Gunton, when the Duke killed a
hare as it was passing over a lenCe. Some of the
shot (supposed to •have struck against the thorns)
glanced off sideways, and wounded a farmer's
boy, who was in the road on the other side,
in the face and thigh. The I);.ke evinced great
anxiety at the event, until Afi': Sharpe, the Sur-
geon, who happened to be a spectator, examined
the boy. and assured his Grace that the wouruls
were inflicted by spent shot, and be
of no consequence. The Duke then resumed.
the sports ot the field, and afterwards very kindly
presented the boy with. five, pounds.

IW-Mrt;ll

r.. 14
2,,
, , „
-est

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COUR f OF KING'S BENCH, F. 5.

MR. HOBHOt SE.

This being the day chosen tor making the re-
thin to the writ of Habeas Corpus, granted last
Tuesday on the motion of Mr. Joshua Evans, for
bringing up the body of John Cam Itobhouse,
Esq. in order to be disehlrged from his commit-
ment by the House of Commons, Mr. bum n, the
Governor of Newg,Hie, brought his prisoner into
Court at 10 o'clock. Mr. ~
Uoblrou,e was ac-
componied by the lion. Kinnaird, and
several other friends, and took his seat on the
Attoiney's Bench. At an catty hour the Court
was crowded in every part by spectators anxious
to t,iiness the result of the proceeding. This,
however, being cro.vn paper day, the Court, at
its sitting, commenced with the business appoint..
ed for the day, and was employed in hearing ar-
guments upon Qnarter 6essions cases (none of
%%Ankh were of public interest) until half-past two
o'clock,
When tine Chief Justice announced that the
Court would proceed no further in the crown
paper, and asked if Mr. Evans was in Court i
Mr. Evans then ruse, and answered in the
r ffirmative.

Chief Justice—l understand the person on
whose behalf you moved for a habeas Corpus the
other day is now in Court.
Mr. Hobhouse immediately stood upon the
floor, and Mr. Brown, the gaoler, delivered
his return to the writ, which was forthwith read
by Mr. Dealtry, of the Crown-office. It com-
menced with reciting, that the Governor of New-
gate. in obedience to the writ of this'Court, most
humbly certified that, before the commencing of
the said writ, namely, on 13th Dec. 1819, John
Cam floblionse, Esq. was committed to his cus-
tody by virtue of a certain warrant, to the tenor
and effect following :—A copy of the Speaker's
writ was then set forth on the return, which re-
cited, " that whereas the House of Commons
haul resolved, that a certain letter, addressed to
Thos. Lord Erskine, &c. was a scandalous libel
and calculated to inflame the people °I this country
to acts of violence towards the Legklatnre, an,:
more particularly towards the House of Com-
mons, and that•it was a high contempt of the pii-
,,vileges and constitution of that House ; anti
whereas John Cain Hobliort4, 14;sq. having ac•
knowledged himself to be the author of the said
libel ; and whereas the said House having this
day .ordered blur, the said John Cain Hobhouse,
Esq., 'to be committed to his Majesty's Goal of
Newgate, these are, therefore, to rt•quire you so
accept into your custody the body of the said
John C.Aus Elobltouse, and him safety keep during
the pleasure of the said Howe, for which this
shall be your snfficient ,authority.—lLited 13th
December 1819, and signed " Charles Manners
Sutton."

The return concluded, that the gaoler here-
by complied with the writ to him, directed by the
Honourable Court, by bringing up the body of
the prisoner.
Mr. Hot house was then about to address the
Court, when

The Chief Justice said—" Then Mr. Evans
does not appear for this gentleman."
Mr. Hobhouse—No, my Lord, it k my pur-
pose to argue this case myself ; but as it is now
a very late time of day, and as I labour under in-
disposition, which will not enable me to go
through my case, I humbly move• and reqiiest
that your Lordship will now allow the return to
be filled, and to order that this case may be argu-
ed on Monday, or any other day that your Lord•
ships may please to appoint.
The Chief Justice—What are the points that
you propose to argue.
Mr. 11°1)1)005e—I intend to spew by the return
which has been made, that the authority under
which I have been committed, was incompetent
for that purpose. I shall dispute the competency
of the tribunal in question to commit au En-
glishman to prison. I shall attempt to spew that
the return itself, even supposing the tribunal to
which I allude, has sufficient authority to commit,
contains certain improprieties which renders if
impossible that I can any longer be detained in
prison, or be subject, any longer to that re=tric-
tion mlti- which I have been so improperly
placed. I can, however, go on if your Lordships'
wi-ih

The Chief Justice—Wait a moment, and we
will consult what is the best course to adopt.—
(The Judges remained in consultation a few mi-
nutes, when the Chief Justice resumed:)--It is
important that we -should know what points of
objection vowmean to urge to tire return.
Mr. Ho-Wm-use—lt is Alike imp ossitile liar
should enter into any detail at present if I am to
come 'op again.
The Chief Justice—We shall probably be in-
duced to give you the time, and not subject you
to the fatigue of arguing the case now, if you tin&
it inconvenient to yourself. But, before we do
that, we wish to know what are the points of on-
,j cction you mean, to urge to the warrant, as set
forth in the return to us.

Robbouse—My Lord, I intend, if I can,
to show in the first place, that the House ot Com-
mons is not a Court of competent jurisdiction to

commit

The Chief Jetstice—That is not a pBint of ob-
jection relating-. to the terms of the return made

to •ttS.

_
Mr. Hobhouse—There is an adjudication -set
forth in the return, -and unless .tbe House of
Commons can adjudge upon the case, in question,
that cannot make their warrant sufficient. 1 shall
endeavour to sheiv,that the House of Comtpionsici
not a C•mrt of Judicature.
The Cl,refJustice—fs that your only ohjeation,A
and if: not, be so good as state what other ottlee4'
tion you have to urge. :
Hohhouse—My other objection tbat-.4se
lionse Commons, even assuming. it to lfka
Court of Judicature, has taken under its cognie
once what osnnot lie considered as a conterpp,
hut as an offence at common law, and not in-*,
why cog nitahle by that House,occordiug to thela-.'s,
of this country tbs. on the face of the proceed.-
ings the House of Commons proceed to adjudge
that the publication alihded to is a libel, which
contend they cannot do. Tbcy adjudge it to -be
a svditions libel tending. to inflame the people to

s

•---71. z: ,;Tt-t'l'72T.'4.lr . %774,4 ' '
1--,:,
'RNsis4;--.4miAlifiV4k.-4
acts rit violence sagattist the - Legiflattir,e!. Toe
third objection I mean '1) submit to the return is,
that, oil the return, it does not appear ilia( I nave
liqd any heariti at al!, and I eert-tihly shall be
able to diens, that this is not only against every
principle of English law, but is even against the
ptoceedihgs of 4li 1-1,,0, •of Commons itself.
1 tie Cliii-J Justice—ls there any other objec-
tion you memo) ,0 loge i
M, flobi•otise—Y-s, toy Lord. In the fourth
place, 1 shall eudtavour to argue, that even as-
suming the House of Commons to be a Court of
Joilicaiore, awl competent to take wider its cog-
nizance wits, is eliuged to be it seditious libel,
,ittil assuming it to have authority to «indent° an
Englishman in his absence, still it cool.' no. 4 on-
&out au Englishman to imprisonment. That is
flit- phint I shall next attempt to contest be-
for*. you,. L,rdsitirs. 111,. ni.x point will be to
St; ,•,, . !,,--)1 i fir littoral remedy for me under these
eiictinistahte:, is to claim my libel-allots at your
Till L"'"l'l'iPs' hand ‘,ll ITah-as Coitnis. I shall af-
r"!' -, 1-‘• art!' tt , • " 't- • . I 1•1 ' ) that,
...21 N s a
face of this searra4.l-4.:s,,miti;.‘" every
‘0 ` (I; hv pr ject ion to be removed, assuming Ilia! no-
t! big ihrorto4 isisa taken place in the mode of
~, ~„,,,,,,,,s .„ !Le m c u.. or „„„„ n„s, still there
an ii,forni:Jity on 'he face of the warm,,, that
:.....-

trj,

Attoo, apj,Parg to tile, 111.1ke it itupo,ible any
11,Pnoer to tle'ail It ; it your Lord.
1.4 , ,
Wish me to state wit +t that I;hjection is, I
I wail do it II • bur, at rite same flint., yfilir Lord-
kiLihleS, and peroti.4sion-, I wit,h to re-,t.t
it tor arg.ilueut when 1 shell be brought up

,i;,;'4111

The Chief Justice, after confertiog With the
t; lit Jule Skild, '' yoti must tell us what your
rt•maitiii•g objection is."
Alr. lloblionse—The informaN•y of wiiich 1
complain, is, that (bete is nn publication at all
stated in the warraot , the pamphlet alluded to
is not called a Folioed pamphlet, and I are not
said to have authorised the printing or publishing
0 it ; and this, I submit, is a vice in the wariaut,
which, according to all priociples of legal and na-
tural justice, is a fatal objection,
The Chief Justice alter conferring a consider-
able time wi-b the other Judges, immediately pro•
seeded to deliver his judgment as follows :—" We
have conferred together, and 1 ant of opinion,
that siring in this Court, we are not authorized
by the la a. to :be land to enter into the discussion
of any of the obj,ct)olis taken by the Gentleman
4s the floor to his tomiei.inetir. It has been
settled by many prece:eor, lamiglit from time to
time before the different Courts of Westminster
Hall, Hod lately in the most formal manner by a
writ of error trwn this Court to 'he. House of
fiords, that it is competent for the House of C0m-
,.0..s to commit fur contempt ; that they are the
.gt i and _the only judge s, as fat as this Conic
411 koow, ef whist is a contempt of them ; sod
il:ita. their are a great number ,ht CdSeS, where mo-
ions .for the • wri• of !Jaheas Corpus have been
',.. made, in which ;his .1,41 otto.l Courts of IVest-
i:i- minster 11.,1: uave, 'rum iinlt! 10 time, reiosed to
r');li,4 implior two oe awhority of the House to corn-
,.'.l '
. ..,it
'And I n 0,,, s;:ite nio,,t distinctly, that we
t,';,,'Z nave. 00 aorhority to entertdin these objections
ry with that view It is su,:gested, that thew is an
4.
1 int,rmidiry it) the form of the warrant, because
~,, publication of the libel is stated to lease taken
A '
'lace ; hut the warrant states, that the House of
Commons has ibis day adjudged that a Pamphlet
1
• . , mitten so and so is a scandalous libel. Now, we
. cannot suppose that they adjudged it to he a scan-
. dalous libel, unless they bad the pamphlet before
d
• them, an
Junder their consideration_ . '1 he adju-
.ti oication necessarily impOrts that the pamphlet was
before them, and that they had considered it.-
-.-, Then it is said, that it does no: appear that the
:' party was heard. The warrant recites, ' That
k whereas John Cam Hobliouse, Esq. having ack-
-04 nowledged himself to .be the author of the pamph-
!•, let, the House of Commons had, therefore, 'or-
e dered so and so.' It.is stayed in their resole-
. , tion,•and it appears by the Speaker's warrant, that
~ fbis GentLeman now before us has acknowledged
~,• himself to be the author of the libel ; we cannot,
'-'4 !Iterefore, enter further into the question. In the
case brought by Sir F. Burdett against the late
i Speaker of the House of Commons, which was
,rguett first in this Court ; Ott!, wards upon a
Writ of Error in the Court of Exchequer ; and,
• ,littuately, in the House of Lords, a distinction
vas taken between that case, which was an action
.1 trespass and the case of a return to a Habeas
Corpus. 'That distinction was taken by Lord
e..,r,kine, when the case was under the consider*.
ion of the House of Lords. All the cases that
ate been decided'in the different Courts of West-
, miuster Hall upon this subject were brought un-
'ter review, aorthroughout the whole decision it
W4l never doubted that the Courts of Common
Law, had that authority to interfere with, super-
sele, of take upon themselves to annul a Resolu-
'ion of the House of Commons, by discharging
tram custody a person proved to have been com-
mitted by (Le House of Commons fur a contempt.
The cases I have alluded to were iii that case all
ackoowledged to be law, and, in the argument,
Ito; House of Lords proceeded 011 the dist iuction
between the ease of a return to Habeas Corpus
and an action of trespass at law. We should,
:herefore, be doing that which we are not autho-
rized to do, if we were to discharge thieGentlentan
out of custody ; and I
now repeat, that if we
should accede to this motion, we should du what
the law won't' not allow us to do."
The prisoner must be remanded.—Mr. Hob-
house interfered, and said : May I have per-

:3
:;
r,?

mission—
The Chief Justice No, Sir, wa have heard
your points.
Mr. Hobbouse bowed, evidently mortified at
the unexpected course which the proceedings had
taken.
Alr. Justice Bayley There have been cases ex-
pressly deci•ice of this question. The first case
upon tie subject is that of Lord Shaftesbury, let
Mad. 144, and the principle there laid down is
this—ti.at a commiiment by either Molise of Par-
liament for a contempt, is r commitment in exe-
cution, and the Courts oh Law cannot during the
session discharge ur bail the party. They bare
no jurisdiction so to' du., The Judges cannot
judge of any law, custom, or usage of Parliament.
A commitment for a contempt of either House
cannot he enquired of by the Judges ; they cannot

'1,6., • •

a:~:y.~

inquire for what the commitment was ; it' is suf-
ficient that the party was committed fur a con-
tempt of the House. These are the principles
,hat are to be deduced from Lord Shaftesbury's
case. The next case was that of the ' Qdeen v.,
Vattie,'-rrported in Lord Raymond, 1105. There
the question under the consideration of the Court
of Kioe's Betich was as to the right of the house
of Commons to commit, and similar principles
were laid clown to those I have mentioned. There
Gould, Justice, said, "That the Courts of West-
minster H ill cannot j''dge of the privileges of the
House of Cormitoos ; those they must debate
among themselves. !Then a commitment by the
House of Commons is returned, though it does
not set out sufficient cause of commitment on
t'thjection cud be taken. The Judges are not to
airtswer matters urged against this privilege of Par-
liament, because the privilege of Par Hameln can-
nor be determined by common law. If the
curse of comfoioueot -is stated to be in breach
4 the privilege ot the House, the Courts of
Wesimhister cannot knotv of the sufficiency of
the cause; for they have no rules to produce
wheel by to judge ot its sufficiency." 'lbis is said
by Puwis, Justice : " The Courts and Judges. have
on jurisdiction todi•charge n man committed by the
House or Crowfoot's for what they have adjudged
to be a contempt," &c. &c. &c. This question
has again and again hero tin,if.r the consideration
of this Court on (tiff-rent occasions, and was par-
ticularly under its consideration, in the case of
So: F. Burdett v Ahbott. It ivas with a vie.w to
flits!, that I Lave collected the authorities to which
I have now referred ; and it was settled and ad-
judged in that case, that the House of Commoos
have power to commit, and that this Court could
nor enter into the propriety of that coMmittnent.
We !lase not the means ot forming a judgment,
whether the commitment was.right or not. That
case was under the consideratiou of the Court of
Exchequer Chamber, and there the Judges were
unanitnonsly of opinion that the decision of this
Court Was right. That decision, I believe, went
afterwards under the consideration of the House
of Lords, and there our decision was ultimately
affirmed upon the principle to which I have been
retesting. For these reasons, it seems to me that
we are not competent to hear any discussion upon
this subject. If we see on the face of the war-
rant, that the party is committed for that which
the House have adjudged to be a coniempt of
that House, I have no difficulty in saying, that
the House had a right to tu<fkr such an adjudica-
tion and that we have no authority to call it in
question. At the time when the application for
this Habeas Corpus was made, I believe the words
of the statute of3l Car. 2. were not so accurately
considered, or perhaps
,bl:ilight to the atteorion
ot the Court as they ought to have been. It was
e assined as a pi opot.ition not to he doubted, that
a party had a plain, clear, legal right to a writ
of ~Habeas Corpus upon such a committreot as
this. Certainly, if the words of he Habeas Cor-
pus act ale looked to, it will be found that it does
nut apply to a case of this description ; for the
benefit of that act is confined wholly to the
case where the commiftneot is for a crime, except
treason or felony, or suspicion thereof. It is clear
that ibe Act does not extend to a case of this de.
scripiion. At the same time, independently of
the Habeas Corpus Act, this Court has a COW

tnon law jurisdiction to grant a Habeas Corpus ;
but, in both cases, there ought always to be a
proper -wound of lam before the Court to justify
them in granting such a writ ; and it m,,st not he
takefr that any man, under any ctirctthme wtstartiit (ces)f,
has a right, as a matter of course, o
Habeas Corpus. I merely -throw this out in con-
sequence of the man net in which this writ was
first obtained, because upon carefully looking at
the statute of 31 Car. 2, it appears to Ore that
this is a case in which the party is not entitled.
to Habeas Corpus as a matter of course. Every
man who applies for a Habeas Corpus, is bound
to lay such a caseupon affidavits before the Court,
as will be sufficieut to regulate the discretion of
the Court in that respect. Upon the whole, it

appears to me, that this Court is not competent
to hear any argument on the points which have
been mentioned, and that we should not be war-

_
ranted in acceding to the motion.,
Mr. Justice 1-loiroyd and-Mr. Justice Best, in
an able and elaborate judgment, severally de-
livered their opinions in concurrence With the
other Judges.

l'he Chief Justice then ordered the prisoner to
be remanded, and at► et►try to be entered on the
'chat), of the reasons why that eourie was
pursued._

Mr..Hoblionse attempted to address the Court
again, but was prevented by the Court. He was
then remanded to his former custody ; and in his
passage through the Hall hr was loudly cheered
by an immense crowd which had assembled.

Arter he had kit the Court, the Chief Justice
and Mr. Justice ilolroyd said, they wished it to
be understood that al; hough a writ of Habeas
Corpus had been grauttd to ►Mr. Hobhouse, in the
first instdncc, on the- authority of a dictum of
Lord Kenyon, in " The King r. Fowler," T. R.,
that this must not be considered as a precedent in
future, because, after looking carefully through
the Habeas Corpus Act, it was clear that the writ

of Habeas Corpus could uor he granted as a matter

of course, and without eußicirnt wounds laid he.
fore the Court for its inierposition.

MR. HUNT AND THE LANCASHIRE MAGISTRATES.

At the riling of the Court at half-past four
•'Clock, Mr. Hunt took his station in the centre
of the floor, and manifested an inclination to ad-
dress the Court.

The LORD CHIEF- JUSTICE.—Me. Hunt, what
do you want ?
Mr. Hunt.—My Lord, I haves motion to make
to the Court.

The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE.---What is the us-
tote of it ?

Mr. Hunt.-1 will shortly state it. I move for
a rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari
should not issue out of this Court, to wove my
trial " the King against Hunt and others," for N
conspiracy to overt hi OW t lie C7OVer11111r11: at the
Manchester Meeting on the I till, of August
out of the juricliction of the County of Lancaster,
and into that of the neighbouring County, th.t
of York, or else,. within the immediate jurisdic-
tion ofbis honourable Court, in. Middlesex or

West:bluster, I make this motion on the grow
that I shill not have a fair trial in Lancashii
(,eliere the cause now rests), and—
The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE—Are there oth
parties in the cause, and do they all concur in 11,
motion /
Mr. Hunt—l do not know there are othe
with me in the indictment.
Mr. Justice BAYLEY—We cannot help tha
but we must know, before we can consider yo
motion. All the parties who are indicted me
come into Court, and concur in the application.,
That is the rule.
Mr. Hunt-1 know some of them do concur
the motion I now make, and the rest may, ft
any thing I know. But how can I ascertain the
consent, so as to bring them into Court, as yo'
Lordship says I must ? Many of them I only sa
when I was thrown into gaol among them. I a
accused of a conspiracy with men whom I neve
to my knowledge, saw until I was made a prison,
in Manchester. How am I to bring them in
Court under such circums, ances am ready
stow that the trial ought, for the ends of justic
to be removed out of Lancashire ; and 1 trus
that under such circumstances the Court will gra'
me the rule.
The Loan CHIEF JUSTICE.—We must kno
whether the parties do concur in your motiot
That knowledge must come to us in the regal.
way. Unless we have it, we cannot receive you
application.

IMr. Iluni—My Lord, how am I to procure tb
knowledge ?
The' LORD CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justic
BAY LEY then both said, the Court could not gran
the rule. The Judges rose lion] their seats, an
retired from the bench.

THE KING O. MR. SHERIFF PARKINS AND OTHER
_ _

Mr. DENMAN rose to call the attention of th
Court to the case " of the King against At
Sheriff Parkins and others :" his object was t
press upon the attention of the Court the neces
city of fixing a day to bring this cause to issue
As it stood now on the paper, with the quantit,
.it business which was fixed before it. there wa
little probability, perhaps, of its coining on dur,
tug the present Sittit:gs. It was, therefore, mos
desirable for the interests of all the parties, an,
cwisideriug also the great public importune
which attached to the subject, that some da:
should be fixed with as little delay as possible
for bringing the matter to issue. The Learuet
Counsel said, he saw one of the parties interest
ed in this cause now in Court.

Air. Hunt (she party alluded to) rose from hi,
seat, and said that he was most anxious the tria
stkould come on as early as possible. He had s,
expressed himself when the parties came into
Court on ihe first day. "I he postponement (het
took place without his conc►,rrence, as he had de•
elated his immediate readiness to go- to trial a
the time. He was now ready for trial, and 111
could not half) urging upon the Court the area
hardship to which he was wit by the delay :
had thus to attend with his witnesses fron
t Lae to
day at considerable inconvenience, and to Leal
postponements caused by others, and with which
he hail nothing to do. ►ndeed, Mr. Denman had
himself refused to fix a day on a tormer occasion
For his ow•n part, he hoped the Court would ac-
cede to the Learned Gentleman's present applica-
tion, and fix as early a day as possible for the trial.
Mr. Justice BAY Lay.--.llow does it stand on the
peremptoty paper.

. .
Air. DENMAN—It is very low down, and so si-
tuated as not likely to come on within the pre-
sent sittings of the Court.

The Loan Curer JUSTICE, after conferring with
the other Judges, said, that as an arrangement for
fining a day had not been acceded to when it was
formerly mentioned• in Court, they (the Court)
could not now interpose, and place it in a different
situation in the paper. This case could not be
accelerated except at the expence of others, which
must then be obliged to- yield to it. The Court
must be always sorry for the inconveniences to
which parties are unavoidably exposed-by repeated
attendances in their business ; but to give the re-
lief now applied for, to these particular bodies,
would be to cast a burden. upon others. The cause
must now take its course as it stood upon the
paper. This is the information against Mr. Alder-
man Waithman, &c.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Fkl. 5.

BUTT V. CONANT.

Mr. Serjeant \ratioHale said, this case came
before the Court on a special verdict. It was an
action of trespass and false imprisonment, brought
by the plaintiff against Sir Nathaniel Conant, for
having issued a warrant, by which the plaiwific
was arres►ed, and subserviently committed for
want of bail. The warrant had been issued on
account of the publication of two libels, , one on
Lord Elle-,borough, the late Chief Justice of the
Court of King's Bench, ani the other on Lord
Castlereagh.—The ipresiions raised on the special
verdict were, first, whether any person may be
arrested and held to bail for a libel, before in-
dictmeut p—and, secondly, whether a Magistrate,
in his individual capacity, can issue a warrant for
that purpose The vestions were of great lin-
portance, inasmuch as they were not merely legal
but constitutional, and as they involved that which
had always been highly esteemed, and watchfully
guarded by Englishmen—the Liberty of the Press,
and the personal freedom of the subject. Fur
himself, he was one of those who would give
great powers to Justices of the Peace; but-then,
• in making that admission, be wished to add, they
were not there to legislate, but to expound whet
had been enacted. As ►bis was a case in which
the defendant contended for the affirmative, the
onus of proof lay upon hitn ; and unless be could
skew son►e positive rule of 'law, or some clear de-
cision or authority in his favour,. he (Mr. Nerjeant
Voughan)insisted that his claim of jorisdiction must
fail, and the plaintif• must recover. And he would
add, in the words ut a great lawyer, that if the
authority was to he found in tie books, it was
raw, hut it not, it should not be adu►itted.—
After having cited many_ atchorities, and referred
In particular to the cases of the seven Bishops,
‘Vilkes, and of the Queen v. Derby, the Learned
Serjert►►t submitted, that the Court must give
judgment in favour of the plaintiff, or come to the
resultitioo of overturning the cases of the seven
Bisho• of Rex v. Wilkes, and of the Queen v.

•oe ...our' 15111 ''icy wound hear the replY.:'
CI
__ ____---—-- - i. .. • .. • ,•••.o,lC‘t WCI C 1/11111giii un- again, but was prevented by the Court. He was having, issued a warrant, by which the. plait-elf Monday (this day).—Adiourned,
. ~
.i. ,ter review, atorthroughout the whole decision it then remanded to his former custody ; and in his was arrested, and subsequently committed for
~ .
~
~,.
4 was oever doubted that the Courts of Common
A shocking accident occurred on boipi his '1";
./,:.
1 passage through the Hall hr was loudly cheered want of bail. The warrant had been issued on
:.iii.... Low, had that authority to interfele with, super- by an immense crowd which had assembled. account of the publication of two libels, , oue on jesty's ship Lee, on IVedoesdav afternoon 0,10
.0' sede, or take upon themselves to annul a Residue After he had lett the Court, the Chief Justice Lord Elle-,borough, the late Chief Justice of the
ion of the House of Commons, by discharging and Me. Justice Iloiroyd said, they wished it to Court of King's Bench, ani the other on Lord
..`
trom custody a person proved to have been corn- be understood that although a writ of Habeas Castlereagh.—The questions raised on the special firiiig the royal sal ate in honorm of the ae'cr,e
of his Majesty; a seaman named Turner .4.`c
in the act of ramming borne at one of the carrri.t/
. milted by tl.e House of Commune fur a contempt. Corpus bad been grautt dto Mr. Hobliouse, in the verdict were, first, whether any person may be
The cases I have alluded to were in that case all
4,.
first instance, 'on the- authority of a dictum of arrested and held to bail for a libel, before in- ades, when it exploded, avd blew the poor IOW:
into the sea. Mr. Potbury, a midshiPmarr,f;
serving the catastrophe, immediately jumped ri,
'.. , aCknowledged to be law, and, in the argument, Lord Kenyon, in " The King v. Fowler," T. R., dictmeut )—and, secondly, whether a Magistrate,
s., the House of Lords proceeded WI the dist itiction
between the ease of a return to Habeas Corpuses future, i
that this must not be considered as a precedent in in his individual capacity, can issue a warrant for
future, because, after looking carefully through that purpose i The qoestions were of great im- board, with the intention of saving the unfoCt'i
nate sufferer, but he stork instantly,s'end tbus'faii
~,,,. dnd an action of trespass at law. We should, the Habeas Corpus Act, it was clear that the writ portance, inasmuch as they were not merely legal
ed in his bumarie and courageous. exertions : Ili.
. :berefure, be doing that which we are not author of Habeas Corpus could trot he grriuted as a matter but constitutional, and al they involved that which
..,
thought that tbe.man tvas sO severely w liiil!
ot
.•1
t,
, „ rued to do, if we were to discharge this. Gentleman
had always been highly esteemed, anti watchful{ that he died instantly, as the sea was cv • d 'l4iii'j
ot course, and without sufficient grounds laid he-
o etc'
It out of custody ; and I now repeat, that if we
ts, fore the Court for its 'interposition. guarded by Englishmen—the Liberty of the Press', blood —(Piymouth -Journal )
ki should accede to this motion, we should du what
and the personal freedom of the subject. For
MIL HUNT AND THE LANCASHIRE MAGISTRATES.
__,,„l
morommoscimocivon.c.awrammirmormiareemsworamawreame.onmarasnamllts..,
;he law woold nor allow us to do."
himself, be was one of those whowould
give
-,* The prisoner must be remanded.—Mr. Hob- At the rising of the Court at halt- past four great powers to Justices of the Peace; bit then, BIRTHS.
•,.., house interfered, and said: May I have per- o'clock, Mr. Hunt took his station in the centre in making that admission, lie wished to add, they Ah,.,,,
At Edinbn • It, on the 2:3(1 January, 'Mrs. Johnt,toug)
of a daligiglitcr, being her sixteenth child.
•
mission— of the floor, and manifested au inclivation to ad-
di
i .
were not there to legislate, but to expo I I tint. roller Yesterday morning, in Baker-street, Portrnan-squaref'A
,0•., 'rite Chief Justice : No, Sir, wa have heard dress the Court.
- had been enacted. As Ibis was a case in which . dal).*
Lady of Sir Gregory Osborne Page Tumor, Bart. or a T, ,
• It- '
_4l
your points.
The LORD CHIEF' JUSTICE.-1.11% Hunt, what the defendant contended tor the affirmative, the ter.
Monday last, at Edinburgh, the ViscuunWss DO'.
: - Mr. Hobbouse bowed, evidently mortified at do you want ?
onus of proof lay upon hitt' ; and unless he could of a'sun.
..>•7':
s. the unexpected course which the proceedings had Mr. Hunt.—My Lord, I haves motion to make shew some positive rule of 'law, or some clear de-
,,-.tp taken. to the Court,
eision or authority in his favour, he (Mr. Nerjeant On Saturday l MARRIED.
last, at St. James's Church, Thomas Wal',.te)(;
A Mr. Justice Bayley: There have been cases ex- The LORD CHIEF JusTioe.—What is flee 1111- Vaughau)insisted that his claim of jurisdiction must F.s.q. of A tzyle-stt cet, to Eliz4hetb, youngest daugliW:
:: pressly decisive of this qoestion. The first case fuse of it ?
tail, and flue plaintiff must recover. And he would ,losepli Guudeliild, Eq.S. E. ' )tithaark.
„.........!4%'-.
, upon the subject is that of Lord Shaftesbury, lot Mr. Hunt.-1 will shortly state it. I move for add, in the words of a great lawyer, that if the
DIED.
Henn'
•:' mad, 144, and the principle there laid down is a rule to show cause why a writ of eerlit'fari authority was to be found in the books, it was On the 6th February, Eleanor, youtrgest daughtp.r of .''..,
.:, this..-41.ai a commitment by either House of Par- should not issue out of this Court, to wove mY raw, but it not, it should not be I ; 1
at.m.ttec..— Dealtry, Esq. of Bedford- row. .
~,,fie
' Bament for d contempt, is it commitment in elm. trial " the fling against Hoot and others," ford .
i ‘‘ tier having cited many_ atchorities, and referred s,a(;),diterS:iiiiialy,,,at
Ntohreb house
uroy
Nioifss her
ri e
,h,
irnost II er- i n-/a w (r`•
2:. cution, and the Comfa of Law cammt during the conspiracy to overtlit ow the' Cinvernmen:. at the in particolor to the cases of the seven Bishops, !
1, •
r.-,-, session discharge ur bail the party. They bare Manchester Meeting on the I fitlr of Atiguat last,
Wilkes, and of the Queen v. Derby, the Learned --'------- ----- .
.._ - - •
603
' -to jurisdiction so tu' do. The Judges comic out of the jurisdiction of the County of Lancaster,
-.." UPS -of No. ‘l9, ' • A
LoNDON: Printed byJ. B. CARS) ) ~. sv..
:...'s ' Scrjerint submitted, that the Court must give
t, judge of any law, custom, or usage of Parliament. and into that of the neighbouring County,. tl!at • .
Junginent in favour of the plaiutiff, or come to the Ormond-street, Queen-grin are; atni robilished by ~:,0^
SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South P4oltorz-street, at TH,O Orr'
'.'f',,.. A commitment for a contempt of either House of York, or else,. within the immediate jurisdic- resolotiou of overturning the cases of the seven Difcc., No. 112, strand; where Acireitisenwnts, Of,
.',. cannot he enquired of by the Judges; they cannot don .01: tills honourable Coati, in: Middleaex or., oisho Is,
of Rex V. mikes,
and
of the Queen
v. looters, :i.e. (mist-0110 most he a•idressf:d _
,k•L'-• Iv,. •• ).• 4' ' ~!'''• • ~._ •,,c, ~,, ,: V,7;"'",,•?'',774` loP•r.w.ti,•';'
',-. • • t,i'. 1,.-", ~...•,—.,' .;.i''',;- : ..rrf !..'''';'• i, 7, ~ • —','• :.•,.. v—,,,..-..- '" .
.-'1 '.7
.* •.. '•• ~''..!;- .. ,"4.;•-',.:1," •. Z,; '''-,:t '',Xj ''. .:,,.•`;',..4,;1;?:=.ii.•:V•-•2%,.1,; '•.•!i.kriy-
.c., 4,..,,,4,. ....,
,?,40.0A ~, , ~.74 ,it ,‘. ?, , • ~/V,.
..'",:" t • . •:.•, 'r '•
.:
; -,
• • ✓, 41,tit-♦iilittsi '.7.;, •::: ..:.,i...,..::' :.:7 , ;•''' l'''r,---.-14'' •-.3' '••••• ',,, -'.• ". As.. A.--- -.'.`:'!‘' '•••'•‘ - - ••••• ,• ••• Y:,•0•;`,0.;,e,II)„,. ~ tr,,,,, . ..,y7,....,,,r,...5,,,-s.4%„Ns.Acsikaitt:,stra., •: • autx*•4l‘,..... .0.,*,,,,, • .. -
~ ..,
, '.
-'

, .
••:'•-• - ••
"I''''`'',ir.."'!".,7..t•'.'ell'iaw'stste • ' „ . Isere; - . ee.....e... ~ ee . , e ''..„..
t'-..t,a,7- e. „.;,..yea. eeee-e.e. , ...,,ea , , a esepe,a,z_eee, eef.,,,,e,-,e,:',.;„teoatai-'' ' , ;.7. • ,-.:F-,---..-
',
1 :;.
Ina t) 1; Derby ; and contended, that as this -claim '''''''''
ire, jurisilictio went directly in derogation of the
liberty of the subject it should be strictly watefi.
her ed, and that the sebmission of poverty or guilt W.
his not to be taken as a precedent or allowed as at/
authority. lie concluded by observing, that lb' . '
ers 48th Gco. 111. c. 38, furnished an inference 41.0
favour, (or it gave the Judges of the King',
it ; Bench, who were, by virtue of their office, Ale
DUI' gist rates, power tri bind over a libeller, and be ''"4
'lst contended it was unnecessary if they possessed that
.- power NT before.
Air. Serjeant BOSANQUET, for the clefendall,t, , ' --....
in observed, that lie was justified on the plaintiff's .. roil
for own authority, for having arrested and held 001 ..-R. T
v
• ll
air to bail. Time only ditletenee in any libel wee l'i"' :: i'll.x°L
)111. its degree of aggravation, and as it might
m.ot,e,l' .e.tioa";l',
ay., or less tend towards a breach of the peace. It 15. 4tetno;
am an offence contra pc ,
ac
n, and therefore it eotele' ', "R•sY.
er, under the jurisdiction of a Magistrate, who is i'. :-Yl::nm'er
let inquire into all felonies, trespasses, Ste. It lisf ' 'can e
le,
110 been contend don the other side, that libd earl',. :,-s-e N„. 1
to not come under the defioif ion of tiespass, heeattO elOVit
ce, it is not an actual breach of the peace ; bit. it it, i..:7, piliilNE
ear SI, observed by Hawking, that " the word trespass II '''l; lia 80,
Lilt of very genet al extent, end it a large sense, mat ..,,-: a'4f., the
only comprehends all inferior offences which 'T. -!,'''eipit'arenwl
)cc property and directly against the peace, ea 39; i.:icAlset me seals and batteries, and such like, hut also di ii" ' Jos
lan others which are so only by eatmatatjelion, as al, I:l e Mast
,ur breaches of the law in general arc _said to be:‘ i! 1,1,A1,/,';l,'
-And then, after noticing the power of Jt" :...-{6441,1.-6
'at tires in felonies, &c., he adds; that the wort i' Hat,ve,
trespass- has been noderst nod to extend 111 r,,; --:I\AP
ce " such offences as have a direct and itutli... •,,=,7-':.Putitaiti.i
nt diate tendency to cause such - breaches (1, ...,' 4:. :::iiig,..l
A the peace, as libels, and Sorb like, which 0,, elmi,t.; pi eli`,T,lern
account have been 'adjedged indictahle betofe JtA', ;4 Ag".
ts• (ices of the Paace,"-2 11 twit. c 8, s 38 1..e0.. ti, ------
/
lie Coke defines libal to he a contumely or reproecl .
.r. published to the defamation of the Govertrinenre
to of a Magistrate or of a private person, end he sesle' ,7;:; At ee-•
it is indictable because it tends to a breach of lit' -i:;', ''),i 'ft
e. peace. There bad been four cases of arrest ; 11).., i". ~,
'-'4)'' l
ty two first were disputed, On the ground thai the! .:rt;
t.V,
its Were privileged persons ; the two last, thet ti,i'r '''''''s ' c
. ' , a" M.
r- warrants had been issued by the Secretary
at In -time two first, the cases of the se; en Bishops 1,9,: - P'iimz'
id of Mr. %% likes, they assumed the ems( tvotq: '`,lA. l'-'-a'',"(les
ce have beeo good, but that they wereprivileg 4 ;*::';'„..'-' 111::,11.i.j,l'
ey persons. In XVilkes's case, they did not affect Li ',Za I_,'yeeari
c, say, that a private person might not he arres(Tt i. me,""4le
!d The authority of a Secretary of State has tilt lA,„ ~...7.. isZ 811
t- been more infirm, because he cannot administer, ',.,' ';::.% eery,
oath. A man may, upon the slightest assault, .',' . -'..2: of.,,ru be
is committed iu default of bail ; and in 1161, whii: '` _____-41'•
AI may provoke an aggravated bleach of -the palcf -----
,0 j shall it be said that time Magistrate has not the lit ''
f:- ,':'
.-4'. ,
0 jurisdiction ? Lord Hale, Lord Holt, and HawkiP SARA
. . S ',.'l
ti are all opposed to Loud Coke, agreeing that a to! rI
',
:-F
!-.i may be helll to bail before indictment foond•ei,t , `-• '' cc
it Coke denied time power of Justices, even (hall-,
/ aeNst ce',
ie I the Statute -.4 Philip and Mary hail been pasfzi,fr! '.,est. ins.
it 'pis', 1).4',1"-:. It is contended that tbe Ms,.;, t Slmate,',\L, Nol
a , -t-'e has only power in felonies, hot he -I"tt '''',ivtsammee-r
• iii common assaults, and in any thing witice Le/ :
~..J':ntd.Cl4CV
II I to time disturbance of the peace...We need li•ml
,-,e-elyLit,':',.!:i
11 I dread the effect of time power of the MaemStrPr• ~,-,:.!b=k)Je-i
d since the Habeas Corpus Act will prevent itnitl,'; L'is`e',,'"'l'nesti
1., sournent without cause. A Magistrate.may Or' •
•' :..".'- hhi lt.fie Allti
- mit for treason, altholigh it be beyond his jll „tr :'', ',J.' vvy;lPlCks•
- diction. lie is commanded to " keep all ofo,:i ;" iti4e"")
p, s.O 'l3ATti
1
I. minces," and (nest he not, theref4e, prevent:4l,6 ' ;!tenhaw
e possibility of assaults ?--Hawkins, as has bile , .!ele Mr. '.
.. ' tee,
I
shewn, expressly inelur:es libel. . Ir• has bean 1q: ...iik-111'''
- serted that Hale and 1-rawkins confine the
,11°`ii'4`;„1:' := Z'''`';-i' ifj-ium(;;,
- of the Magistrate to actual breaches of the pi4l, ; t.:! ,:llietTa
but time passage cieed shews that Hewlemus irate;' e. .; ~,,,e,,:ig,,,i'l ail
1 that which has a tendency to a breach of •1 • ' 1,...:i; ati.;,,;;.
r peace. Dalton's Justice of the Pence, e. 17 -..."' '‘
lci,,,;‘,,,t'Qiett,,
s page 217, says, " usine words Which-shalltete 1 It: st‘iii;igt,
i
I i the breach of the /trace ;" and in c. 124, he sOM ' Ei';', vele EL.%
t 1" libellers may he boend 16r thei..tiood P .7: 1,741.-.1 „11, 7EYZ
!! ! bavinur... In Kendal Vet 'us 'tiff me, iakimiaie ... *.e. le`,,. 11,isil
~f,.,.... Zl/44:1„,, -3.llll)iit
I I 596, the Court cormaidered the power .....- -;,1 ""',, &e.
iAI ',. t! is t rate anti a Secretary of State iti 'Pk:. '2,'::.l4,i'l'ro:Ds
' I rest as s analogous. There never was e tioolllfe ' !i:".4..;,11(14.1",
ti
1
toe . ea', h rues i
, to the right of the Alagistrete, tor in Qiie.,e• ;a4',..5,, furzeime
Anne's reign there were 43 contaiittu.ents., in 1.1.!;';" rl.4,riidge, t,
Of George 1. 36, George I L 53, end in the (0/%1, !:11,:tit4s.,tai),I
year of George 111, there was also a precede,ir7 t;',;-, t;aau.;;(t)
Irons that time till the 41,, t there were tome, 4.41., .'s:i rkileleG
it was this cessation which first caused the (1(1.'..: :,.i;tistri.:l'llllll
that had now been argued. It appeered too, l',11•-.',.
;.Y. Ulf p`
many others had been arrested for speaking 4elt f.: .'- l'-tla au,
tious words ; but as they had not been imelKs .117eu7:"1,1tit
bail, they were not included in the return he iii,"„ .2' ',i'eiti, a;,',11
just read. Upon the whole, he contended t'll!e, :,;a'''4i),;,,,,the j,
the Magistrate had the power, and iltereforY. -L''. liiAcelil),
,• •.- a.,,,e er0,,,,,.
prayed judgment for the defendant.
,c ; . :.,,,I1
-The Court said they would bear the replY:v: .1, t‘6eY,
~--.. , .I;;. V' ; es.,
Monday (this day).-Adjourned.
. ~ .4 i 1514.11)C
4' lo
. ' • ' ti;OSTc
-
„, .' On R
Ore ..,-_ • -. +
ter' A Allock in g accident occurred on beard his' -, ' ;.!, , lster'
itiersilnYgist the ilrioLyeael ,a,oalnim t Vien(lll)merisn'ioa :II ra if,tfe rttimlo,nanc,crw,bitilo:,,i et..:,11
tli,:le....,.:keiwe.ib,tyL,ii,
of his Majesty; a seamen named --Turner ....''-,, I:er*tilarb)
in the act of rammlng home at one of the caro.4i, . ':'....kv,.1y I\l,
, ades, when it exploded, aoti blew the poor fell%,
~seleill:t11);•,..
into the sea. iulr. l'otbitry, a niidshiPmene;!7i.: ~ e.uree iti'
serving the catastrophe, immediately junreed ‘4:v.,tip
board, with the intention of saving the unfotri.‘i; ei '''' tioctim'eYa(
e , .
nate sufferer, but he souk instently,'end thus :. ~;ie; Lle-ER)
ed in hits humane and courageous; exertions :5,i..el ( ~ ' :I•l,ttii'lli I:
,t:11
thought that the .man was so severely woulif,,l" ':'.- (),ItimeaSa'''
that he died instantly, as the sea %eels covered' 'l.e,'',l'.- .i,.; ''SJA°Kut!il
blood -(Plymouth journal )
... i.; -• e tnth,,,i
,4, -- r bE
.•., , -,. ~ °rein.
BIRTHS.
• '.
' -I MA ''g' I
A lAs.:ti, E,,dfilailiurgh, daughter,nn beingtl)e2:3lidt.r.hs:iixntielleni•lyt,sNctitiisl.e.Jobnstol!
,cLI:::-,.,.. ;
:::......,. 4 „-a., -
Poly;
Yesterday limning, in Baker-street, Portman-squaref:A,. -4,"; fp."EFFI
Lady of Sir Gregory Osborne Page Tumor, Bart. of_____;._;.„a daf,'r"1,;''4t,:.,:.1.:::4.::31::::4:,,:111,,,1Fyietvi
iii.,,, :
... . f, -A.ML:s
ter.
On Monday last, at Edinburgh, the VisevantinsDaPr,... , L..: 4114100 H,
of a'sun.
-, 1 1,1„s lie
Mir,.RIED. ' y, . ti•i, .or , ).1,.L j
, ute e, „eee ach ,On Saturday last, at St. James's Church, Thomas n'a '4" 3'..' )lati ',. eV(
F.,q. of A,,yl,...stieet, to Eliz=dieth, youteeebt dartigbiti ':,..
~,,f. 1
~,ii; 111,,,1,1•ii
,looeph Goodchild, Esq. Southmark. "'". tc.,N ftverq '
_ . .
%rt.; tato
DIED. r, 4.,l .Ll 1:111''g,'•
On the 6th February, Eleanor, youugest daughter of Hen '', •ki.n. se.3.s, 110 t
,1 ~.•• ea
Dealtry, Esc'. of Bedford- row.
'. II rr
014 Sunday, at the house of her brother-in-lax (11 • , 6414. •
~",
Sanderson, Esq. Nurbory), Miss Hig:.:ins.
.............................„re, ,
3,. i...
t. • Ni 0 I
..a.,....................,,......a......0.
' 6114 dlll
••••••..............
LONDON: Printed by J. B. CARSTAIIIS," of No. V, si,-. ii.. '...,,i, 4,iet.,13.,, 1
Ormond-street, Queen•vinarc; and publisi,eil bq ;!,..:Ai', -,,,,,4 1,,,,i,;;-:. 1
SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South Pdolton-street, at TH1,;,,,,f', ...ni,..'!;!,-lie s 0 r
°Wee, No. 11., Strand ; where Adrantisenwnts, l','" 'W,,,,- 1(
i,..tters, &c. (,mist-olith) nitt‘t be addressq •
-a '',,t411,-,i:,'2,TiMi