The Sun.
London, England, 1820-10-26 00:00:00

'l'o THE VOTARIES OF BEAUTY,

•
UDSON'S 130tANIC TOOTH POW-
DER, recommended by many eminent Physicians,
is Pit EPARED of BALSAMIC VEGETABLES of mini de-
tersive properties. It is entirely free, of those corroding
acids which form the basis of most Tooth Powders, and which
eventually prove sit destructive ; where the Teeth are loose
or the Enamel injured, it fastens them in the one ease, and
revives the Enamel in the other; it removes 'Tartar, cures
the Scurry. and produces a healthy redness to tke puns, a
pearly whiteness to the Teeth, to the breath a balmy I'm-
grams., and is an infallible preservative against Decay, and
tloiTootti•Ache. Price 2s. Mi.
Also HUDSON'S I I [ILE DIVINE (recoerDended by the
late Dr. Hunter), preserves and beautifies the Hair, and
Whert it has fallen off from illness, perspiration, change of
climate, or. any causes, which deprive the Hair of nutrition,
and produce prestittre detny, by using the Mile Divin-t, it
assimilates with, or supplies the place of the nutritive Fluid,
rttvl the hair grows as formerly. Svc farther elucidation and
testimony of its efficacy, lira Pamphlet entitled an Essay on
the Hair, enclosed rutnrd each Bottle. Price 3s. tid:,
and Otre Guinea,
ltd the Proprietors' Anent, Mr. ATKINSON, Per-
fumer, No, 44, Gerrard-sttect, lobo-square ; Messrs. Gat-
tie and Pierce, 57, New Bond street; Messrs. Howell and
James, urgent-street ; Nl,!ssrs. Bayley and Mew, Cockspor-
street ; Mr. (Eiger, Cheapside ; and by most Perfumers, Hair-
Dressers, and Medicine Venders is luau and Country.

GLASGOW SEDITIOUS PLACARDS.—The myste-
rious business of the seditious placards was
brought forward by M:. HumE, is the House of
Commons on Tuesday. That Gentleman as-
serts that the placard posted up in Glasgow,
Paisley, and other manufacturing towns in this
district, on the Ist of April last, recommending a
strike of work, originated with Government.—
Now, in the whole of the Scotch trials for treason,
the King's Counsel connected the overt acts with
this placard. In the trials which took place at
Stirling, it was not deemed sufficient to prove
that the" prisoners had been taken with arms hi
their hands opposing the King's troops, but a
proof was also led connecting the Bonnymuir
affair with the placard in question. We have
made inquiries at the proper sources of informa-
tion, and we find, that the seditious placards of
the Ist of April were not only printed, but ori-
ginally drawn up in Glasgow. Two lads, Ro-
bert Fulton, and John Hutchinson, who printed
the address, fled to America, and three hundred
pounds were, at the time, offered for their ap-
prehension. Three well-known persons in Park-
head composed the address, and employed the
above two lads to print it in Mr. M'Kenzie's
office, but without the knowledge of the pro-
prietor ; and the expenses were paid out of the
penny a-week radical subscription. These three
men fled the country immediately upon the re-
ward being proclaimed for the apprehension of
those connected with the publication, and have
never returned, leaving their families in a state of
utter destitution. The whole manufacturing po-
pulation of the western district were prepared,
through their Committes, for the publication of
the first of April, and they acted upon it ac-
cordingly. The simultaneous movements of that
time could never have been effected by any sys-
tem of espionage.—(pasgoto Ilcrut f.)

' k •
TRADE or ALDEttNEY.—The followino- is a'
Copy of an Order of the LordS of his Majesty's
Treasury to the Commissioners of Custom's :
" 'lit-usury Chambers, Sep). 12, 18:10.
'' I am commanded l.)• their Lordships to authorize thene%-
portation of East India while gnosis, warklioused by the East
India Company, not of a higher value than Is. Ed, per yard
to Alderney, in the same manner as theyean now be exoorte.l
to Guernsey and Jersey; aunt Lam to desire you to allow the
vessels which hare by their Lordships' orders been permitted
fora limited period to convey friar. Guernsey and Jersey to
Alderney, wines, spirits, tobacco, pepper, and Sunni, to carry
also sail from Guernsey and Jersey to Alderney, timing the
continuance of the indulgeace, and wider the saute securities
and regulations.
• •Oigned)

4' GEORGE HARRISON."

to look at that a little more particularly, Majocc,
lad stated that there. was a sofa in the cabin
where he slept ; but, from the evidence of Pe-
tazzo, it appeared he-slept in the had, where
there was a hammock regularly slung.. for him,
and therefore there was a strong probability
that he slept there, and_ not in they cabin. But
on referring to Lieutenant HOwpam's evidence, it
appeared there, were only fotir, sofas on board,
two of which were lashed tocretber in the. Prin-
cess's room, and two were placed in the Coun-
tess Oldi's room, 30 that he must have got.otie of
these sofas out of the cabin and placed it over his
head.l iwor.der to hear those soundS of which he
spoke. This was a twin fact, as relating to hear:
ing, to the one of eye-sight which he had at-
tempted to prove at Napies ; and it was the only
fact he spoke to, for there he had not attempted
to state that any of those indecencies had taken
place which had been witnessed elsewhere-. He
had alluded yesterday to the belief which Lieut.
Hownam entertained that Bergatni slept under
the tent ; but Lieut. Flynn's belief did not at
all accord with his, and looking at the evidence
of , Petazzo, who stated that " the bed of
Bergb.mi was in the dining-room,- on the deck,
and was rolled up in the morning, but he had
not seen if the bed was there or not," it
was rendered very probable that_ Lieutenant
,Flynn's supposition was correct. But there was
another witness who corroborated that supposi-
tion, and who would no doubt be allowed to be
a competent witness—he meant Dumont, and
therefore he did infer, as Lieutenant Flynn had
done, that the same arrangement of the beds took
place on the homeward as on the outward pas-
sage. - It would be a good deal to rest on Lieut:
llownam'.g belief, which was founded on hearsay,
without recollehitig also that from the same be-
lief it would appear that other persons had also
slept under the tent: What could be more na-
tural than that it should be so, that when the
gather was mild and temperate, the felnale at-
tendants slept with her Royal highness; but
when it was squally weather, and accidents might
be apprehended, that some one of the male_per-
sons in her suite was also in attendance ; and
who, he Would ask, was so proper a person as her
Royal Highness's Chamberlain, in whose line of
duty it more particularly lay E. But it was said,
that Lieutenants Hownman or Flynn would have
been equally' efficient for the purposes of protec-
tion ; but in case of a squall or the shipping of
a sea, their attention Would .have been called
elsewhere. In case of bad weather coming on,
it would have been their duty to have taken
charge of the. vessel, a, charge to' which it
was well known that British seamen were
much more competent than Italian ma-
riners ; it was therefore necessary that the
individual selected to be near her Royal High-
ness should not be liable to be called away on
other duties: It was in evidence that during the
whole, of the time her Royal Highness was never
.undressed ; and it was probable that the indivi-
dual was changed from time to time. who occupied
that bed; placed at right angles with -the sofa,
but not in contact with it. And there was no-
thing whatever to negative the fact that Bergand
slept.in the cabin below. A great deal had been
said about the bath in the cabin below, but what
had been stated by the witness was con-
tradicted by Dumont, and it was lit proof that
women were about to imagine therefore-that Ber-
gami was there would be quite absurd. A Lady,
of 48, sailing on board of a polacca in the' Wei:-
terranean sea, is .in need of a bath ;
she chases
to have it in a small cabin, which it had been

turzo. The next case stated, in the opening of
hiS Learned Friend, was the circumstance of .
Sacchi's arrivingnt night, and seeing Bergami tome
out of the room °LSO. Royal Highness. From that
their Lordships mii,;l-it infer that something imprO.
per had passed betweeti them. Without saying
any thing at present as to the credibility •of
_this
witness, he would ask, hew was 4e statcment,of
the Attorney-General borne put by the evidenCe
of Sacchi ?. His statement was (p. 430), that he'
returned at night ; tie went into the kitchen, and
next into'the anti-room to see Bergarni. He saw
no one there, and proceeded to his. bed-room ? - •
which was also'emptv, and the bed tumbled ; he
was then going away, when be, heard a voice
(which he knew to>he Bergarni's) 'ask " who is
there ?" To which he answered, " the courier
from Milan." Bergami said it was not necessary
.to intrude into his room at that hour ; and being
asked from what room he (Bergami) came, he
said he could not see, for it was dark. Whes
asked where. the door opposite to Bergami's
room led, he said to other rooms, but he did not
know to what rooms, nor whether one. of theta
.was the Princess's ;—nor, in short, where the
Princess's room was at all. This ignorance 'left
their Lordships at liLerty to suppose that it was
the room of the Princess that Bergami• entered.
His testiniony on this pointer :s attempted to be
supported by that which would be found at page
'-131'f61:114Stii*re says, that when he returned
after having been at General Piuo's with di -
patches, ho saw Bergaini coming from near tha
same place as on the former night. Butas this
witness stated that an alteration was made in
the Princess's apartments, is it consonant With
common sense that lie found Bergami coming on
any occasion out of her, Royal Highness's roor,; ?
It was unreasonable ; and he thought that
this part of the case was destroyed by the
very evidence brought to sustain it. He
would nr:w, at the suggestion of his Learned
Friend, return, to the polacca, and direct their
Lordships to the size of the cabin occupied by'
her Royal Highness. 'At page 90, 'Majocci had
sworn that the room was six or seven feet—as far
(as this witness expressed himself) as between.
the Bar where he was'standing at the time and the
first cross-bench (in the House of Lords), and in
that room her Royal Highness was said to have
taken the baths He would here, however, ob-
serve, that this bath scene was one of the cases in
which there was.but a solitary witness to attelt
it. • This led him to observe, that it might be
worth while to make a catalogue of the cases;
distinguishing these which were supported only
by one witness, those which were supported tly
several Nvituesses,aod those which were supported
Lion.
04
by no evidence at all. There were in all 16 overt
acts alleged in the opening of the Attorney-Ge-
neral, of the first three of which Naples was the
scene—namely, the first, or bridal night; the
masked ball ,at the Theatre of St. CarlOs ;
and the meeting on. the Corridor, depended on
the evidence of • Aladenidiselle Dumont alone.
Then there weme the two neruriences at. Varesse
and Lugano ; neither of these had been attempted
to be supported by any evidence whatever. The
case of Catania depended on. Dumont alone;
'that of Zavoan, on the evidence of nobody. Tlitt
incident at Ephesus had been attempted to be
proved by Majocci alone ; and all that he as-
sorted was contradicted 'by several nairtipeach-
able witnesses. Sacchi's arrival in time night
time with the dispatch from General Pino, was a
story which, like Majocci, he bad also. entirely
to himself. Next tame the ease to which tie
had now particularly
to direct the attention of
their Lordships, the case of Charnitz, which also
rested on a single witir2ss, and that' witness Un-
wept. trhe LeaTned Gentleman proceeded to
contrast the statement of this, case, as proved t,y
the Attorney-General, with the case at proved
by Dumont's evidence. The comparison, he
said, afforded an additional proof of the malicious
and corrupt motives by which this witness sagac!_aated ; she deceived his Learned Friends; she
I.a'd stated circumstances, which by thernselvs
made out a prima facie case of gailt, while slat.,
purposely concealed others, which, if known,
mustio
iv have
utterly discredited such, an imputa.
Dumont, in her examination in chief, en.
red to spew that the Princess was undress.
ed; but hi the cross-examination, th fact cues