The Sun.
London, England, 1820-07-27 00:00:00

THURSDAY, JULY 27, 1820.

kTRONISED by her MAJESTY, their
.Royal Highnesses• the Duchess of York, and Duke of
Sussex, His Imperial Majesty the Emperor of Russia, by
their special authority, and. by most- of the Nubility and
(lenity throughout '
ROWLAND'S MACASs.-111. OIL, .the Original -and Ge-
nuine, warrant, 1 to afford thegreafeSt nourishment to the
Human Hair'—pre,ents its tieing ilijnred by' change of ch.
'mate, illness, tray:lolg, &c,--,temores the scurf, harshness
and do ness",: prevents the hair falling off or turning grey,
'and pro'duces a thick grnwth on bald places, makes the hair.
-soft, curly, and glt.ssy,,preserveli the cull in damp weather,
produces whiskers and eyebrows—Price S. 6t1.-75.-10s. 6d.
and One Guinea per •bottle.
Also, ROWIAND's ESSENCE of TYRE.—Brmerelywet-
ting the Ilair, with this -prep-station, the Proprietors warrant
to produce ininn.liately a perfect change in Red or Grey
Eye-Arrows, &c. to a beautiful glossy and
1314,wa sirrh ack, imitating the exact natural
.coicur. Washing makes this Dye woredurable. Ladies or
'Getitlemen their•Hdir with ease and secrecy. Pric•it
o.—and Ins. Gd.

Sold wholesale, retail, and tor. exportation, by the sole
Proprietors, A. ROWLAND and 'SON*, oorncr of Kirby-
street,- the first turnip;;' on t,,i'lgL liatton-garden,
Holborn, London a and, bylcii4intnicnt,. by all Perfumers
and Mecippe Venders.tbrongliout Erirope.
SON respectfully caution the Public,
pat icidarly those who. ate travelling Frattee, against spurious
coMposed of deleterious ingredients injurious
'to the nail'. To ptevent•the imposition, ask for Rowland's
dr Rowland's Dye, ,and observe that each genuine bottle
is signed on the outside label, in red ink, '' A. ROWLAND
and without that signatnre are counterfeits.

JAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHI NCERY,,JuLy 26.

THE QUEENSBEURY LEGACIES.

THOMAS V. MONTGOMERY.

TIIC,LORD UII_INCELLOR, on coming into
observed that he had ekaniined the calculation
.fOr. giving a 16th of the 'legacies .claimed by the
legatees of the late 'Mike of ilueen§berry, and
lie 'found he'Wonld not be anthorizedjO grant it.
Ile wished to have the assistance of the Bar as
to What lie was going toSitggest. Claims had. been
made to a great amount, which might never be-
aade good. 'F;ar. instance, suppose he should say
that • the -claithg or demands on the estates' of the
testator amounted to 500,0001. in-the 3 per Cents.
and they are mucli-above---that sum, and that we
'Were.to set apart so much 3 per 'Cents., to meet
that sum, the dividends would belong to the
claimants, and if 'their claims were reduced, the
dividends would then belong to the legatees, and
residuary legatees.—Looking at this case, which
did not differ from that of a common debt, al-
though the amount was great, then suppose .a
debt of 2001.-which was claimed, and sent to the
Master to ascertain. the actual. sum due, would
not the same principle apply if It was to the
amount of 500,0001. ? In regard to the 101 leases
which had beea before -him in another place,
where
,the Marquess of Queensberry
;sought to
set them aside, and if set aside, would not the
Marquess come for damages on. the fluid in
Court ? If he di4 then there was so much stock
set aside for him, and he would be put in the same
Situation as if he could make his claim good now.
'There Might be a IciSs on the stock, but that he
could not help
.;. however, to balance that, there
might be a profit, which the claimant 'would be
entitled to. lie would be going out •of the re-
gular course of the Court to give to the legatees
what Might hereafter appear to belong''to the
claimants. Suppose they .were to call upon A, a
Marquess, or any Other great man, for the amount
of his supposed claim, he could not ask to be put
in a better situation 'than if he could 'be, paid this
day, for we would say to him, cc You cannot now
establish your claim, and when you can we have
-set iside'so much stock to Cover it ;
,and .you Will
take the profit of that stock." • Ile was therefore
clearly of
,opinion that he ought pot to allow any
part of tile -fund in Court to be paid out. to the
legitees until there was sufficient stock set apart
to cover What the claimants might be entitled to.
Mr. MURRAY said, that the objection Which
had been stated by his Lordship had before oc-
curred to him. It would be necessary, to carry
.the suggestion of his LOrdship into effect, to have
the consent.of the ;claimants, and they resided in.
Scotland. • There was another. difficulty, there
being infants parties in the cause.'
The LORD CHANCELLOR—You can go now .to
Scotland in two slays, and the. Accountant-Gene-
ral's Office will not close before the 25th of Au-
gust, which will give you time enough to obtain
the necessary. consent ; as to there being- infants
interested, that is not material—l doubt whether
what I did before was not contrary- to all the
rules of the Court, although I believe the money
to be safe, but I will not venture to repeat it.
.Let the appropriation be on the maximum of the
claimant's, demands, liable to reduction if they
do not. make their claims good.
The laSt Seal after Term will be on Saturday-
next,

The fatal effects. of lightning were lately aw-:
Intly exhibited in the person of a man named T. .IoNTEs,
a butcher. in the vicinity,of Llandrindod Wells. He had just
taken shelter in a cottage froni a thunder-storm, and was ex-
pressing himself fortunate in having a roof over his head,
when. melancholy to relate, he was struck dead on the spot
by the electric fluid. .The cottager's" wife and children were
.knocked down, and severely injured ; but are in a fair way of
recover:. --A 'waggon, it a field at a short distance, was
shivered to atones.

The visit of the Fair Circassian to London has
been made the subject of a farce at one of the
Minor Parisian Theatres, under .the title of La
Georgienne Luiulres.. It was not, however,
very successful. One of the French Papers in-
tern's us that some -unjust attacks on the English
and on London, weep received with Ldisapproba-
descriptive of the electio
wassng cc
ovehemently applauded._
t ifo ,
Radical'
ca thatl, ,
a o

, • The four Theatres in the Belfast circuit are
adirertited to be let or sold.•

.LONI;ON JOU It NAI,S,

[D.,IILY EXTRA:CT,i.]

FROM THE MORNING PAPERS OF THIS DAI%

[Morning .Post.]

Much as we disapprove of the manner in which
a provincial Editorhas expressed himself towards
the Queen, it is impossible for ,us not to feel at
least r qually indignant at the late atrocious
libels against the King and both Houses of Par-
liament. If her Majesty be conscious of her in-
nocence, how much is it to be regretted that she
should be so little aware of the injury likely to
result to the Country .and herself from the un-
bounded lieentiousness of her immediate parti-
zans, ;who neglect no means,' however base and,
infamous, of misleading the' thoughtless and ig-
norant classes of the community-, or of outrage-
ously traducing and vilifying the Constituted Au,
thorities of the Country. The evident object of all,
these diabolical expedients, is to produce such a
state of affairs as their base authors weakly ima-
gine may tend to intimidate the proper Judges
from proceeding to the trial of the 111uStrious Per-
sonage. In this respect, however, they may rest
assured, they will find themselves completely dis.,
appointed ; and were it possible for a moment to
entertain a supposition to the contrary, the friends
of the Queen (if she' really have any about her)
should consider well what the consequence of
such an event (little short of revolution in
its nature) would be to herself ; and what
favour she could reasonably expect from a
set of revolutionary ruffians, who, w9re they
to effect their, infernal purposes, under the pre-
tence of favouring her eamse, would not fail ulti-
mately to make a signal sacrifice of their fair
dupe„ though it might answer their. views ,to
exhibit her for a time as the Goddess of Rea-
son. As a Member of ,the Illustrious House
of Brunswick, we therefore implore her Ma-
jesty to abandon her present-dangerous and dis-
graceful connection for her own sake as 'well
as for that of the country ; and above all, instead
of appealing to the ignorant and senseless rabble,
we would exhort her to place a just confidence
on-the Tribunal to which her cause is to be sub-
mitted, and (rejecting the evil counsels of base
faction) not suffer herself to suppose that arty in-
fluence on earth could induce the high-minded
Nobility of the United Kingdom (assisted as
they:will be in the 4 investigation and decision by
all the Learned Judges of the Law) to find her
guilty, orto pass a; Bill depriving her of her rights,
except upon evidence the most clear and conclu-
sive, and under such striking circumstances as
would render the act imperative- euisthem, with a
due regard to the honour and interest of the na-
tion in which they possess so large a stake. If
there be a Tribunal on earth in which -a sense of
honour and justice exists in its highest degree, it
is that before which her Majesty is about to ap-
pear ; and if by the unbounded latitude allowed
for her defence she should be enabled to prove
her innocence, we shall most sincerely rejoice in
her acquittal.

[Morning Chronicle.]
The misfortune with respect to the Sovereigns
and Ministers of the Continent is that every thing
bad of them is greedily swallowed, and that
nothing of all -this appears.in_public, uo pub-
lic Contra-diction can appear. Arid here is the
peculiar advantage which our Monarch derives
hurl., a. free Press. A Ministerial writer steps
forward
,in vindication of the King's personal
character, which he, it seems, has occasion to
know (he may have better sources of knowledge
than we have,) does not stand so high as it ought
to. do with" persOns a little above the populace,
and he 'boldly tells these people that the sen-
timents in which they have been tempted to in-
dulge are unfounded. Persons, who may have en-
tertained these sentiments, cannot fail to be struck.
with the'.manly sinceritywith which this Asser-
tion appears to be made, which mustlead S0113(=
at least to question the notions that they may have
lightly takep up, and to abandon them, when
th.ey
find that they are really without foundation.
would have been serving still more the Illus-
trious Party whose character he here endeavours
to rescue frorn calumny, if, hi order to facilitzjte
any such honest inquiry, he had specified the sen-
timents to which he more. particularly alludes as
unfounded. Perhaps in a future article he will do
so. It needs no' reasoning on oar part to convince
him, that as a-true friend to our-Monarchical Go-
vernment, he is bound to do so. It is.very
heas
is in
says, ccs, that contempt for the ,Royal Per-
few minds connected with any great
veneration for the Kingly Qllice." This is abun-
dantly exemplified by the, Scent llistory of the
Continent. Now we can conceive no more efli-
cacious manner of removing this contempt for the
Royal Person, than the shewwg, as well as
that the- sentiments :which it rests are
unfounded.

[British..Prc. ss,]

evening---the•lionse of Lords to Tuesday,
,The two Houses of Parliament adjourned yes-
dayHouse of Commons
tt eh re l
until INlcinday, the2l.st:. .The House of Lords, it
sth of ,August,-and•the•
thus appears, will assemble two days previous to
that which has been appointed for . the second'
reading of the Bill of Pains and Penalties, for the
pu'rpose probably of ,giving,. an opportunity. to all
Members .of the House, who, from various cir-
cumstances, may not have taken their seats this

[PRICE SEVENPENCE,

Parliiiinent, to make the.necessa;*.piths and .de-
clarations, and also that al!' arrangemnts
,pre?.aratory to this:awful proceedipg might lie •com-
pleted. proceedun, against' the - Queen ,is
fainilia.rlycalled. 44 Iler Majesty's -I-Hal," but how-
ever correct such designation may be-in reality; it
iviil not be so regarded by the strict usages of the
IlOuses:of Parlianient. The Lord's will sit„in
their legislative, and not in their judicialcapaci ties,
and the evidence,,m ill, we presume,' be, opened at
once to 'their Lordships, without the preihnindry
or opening -speech, which in ordinary Proceed-
ings in Courts of Justice precedes the testi-
mony.of the witnesses. -The .Mode. of proceeding
irr thiS case differs-essentially ;-froin-..that • which;
should-have beeit'pnrsued, Queen :been
placed in a state of accusation by: the, CoMmons
in the way of iniPeaclnent, or by the Law 9f-
ficerS :of the Crown, in
:the way of- indietincnt
'fOr act CoMmitted by her. Majesty.
In either Of such cases the trial Would be Conducted
according to the established rules of criminal pro-
cedure; but, in the present instance;.. the only
object presumed by the usa4es of Parliament, is
'to inform the Consciences of the Members, and
the fate of the Bill will subsequently depend ra-
ther upon the question of political expediency,
than upon' the judicial-opinions of
.the -Members
'respectively, as:formed upon a fair and ipipartiat
view of the evidence.: As a very erroneous- opi-
nion is entertained by' many upon the:subject ,of
the present prosecution, it may perhaps not,:be
improper to state, that the lianie evidence which
shall have been submitted to the House of Lords
must also be tendered at the bar of the House of
Coninicais, and that, should the Bill .unfortu-
nately pass the Upper House, an opportunity
will be offered to her Majesty's Law Officers-. to
produce new evidence before the House of Com-
mons to- supply all former deficiencies, and' to
strengthen those parts of their Royal Mistress's
defence which - might lie Sound insufficient for
her exculpation at the Bar of the House of Peers.

[New Times.]

An advertisement has appeared, headed in ca-
pitals " Defence of the. Queen," but, it has since
been stated, that her. Majesty haS not " fur-
nished materials" for any defence whatever; If
so, we can only say, that her Malesty.has shewn
more prudence than some of her, officious de-
fenders. , Whatever we have yet seen in the way
of defence has-really been of the nature of libel
upon her character : it.has altogether descended
from the high ground of • purity, and innocence,
on which alone:he can. stand with ho,nour to her-
self or safety to the national morals. „The Queen
asserts the absolute and entire falsehood 'of all
the
~charges brought. against - her : happy shall
we be if she clearly and unequivocally disproves
then' ; but as to the secondary pleas which her
pretended friends set up for her, and especially
that most desperate of all pleas, recrimination,
they amount in effect to an -admission-of guilt,
and are therefore, as we have already, said, ac-
tual libels on her Majesty's character.—Another
intimation which is thrown out by the same per-
sons, appears to us not very consistent with that
.female delicacy
,of which a British. Queen is na-
turally expected to be the pattern. We allude
to tlie statement that her, Majesty intends•to be
personally present at the legislative .proceeding-§
On her. case. Undoubtedly she has a right to
attend but there are many rights-which a deli-
cate female would hesitate to exercise.. We will
do her Majesty the justice to believe that she
could not without great pain,sit (the only woman
among five hundred -men) to hear all the details
which these same voluntary. advisers of Itei.'sAe-
clare,to be ,most filthy, disgusting,and` obscene.
We remember a story of a late eminent Judge,
who, once presiding in a Crim Con. case, recom-
mended that all the ladies 'present 'should with-
draw. Sonic took the hint, but others staid.
His Lordship observing this, simply said, "
We .may proCeed : all the modest women
have left the Court." - •