The Sun.
London, England, 1827-11-26 00:00:00

'RH FUNDS-(THIS DAY).

At CITY, TWELVE 0' aocr.
Etathie-gtil we have some intelligence from Con-
p.43Ple, contained in a Postscript to the Gazette
the pi"' of yesterday's date, which announces that
itoimiellell Government had received despatches
time th"IeraIGUILLEMINOT, of the .sth inst. at which
° news of the events, at Navarin, had been
c-111, that capitalising days; fAratholears which
wox,ien entertained that the disastrous intelligence
the (Ilsile some ebullition of popular fury towards
foUadm tilui inhabitants, seemed to be without
Tittle °o, 84 every thing remained calm and quiet.
telliare ;till some unbelievers, who ask why in-
trWeellas not arrived to our own Government ; and,
ortet;iWtY the cause it is not given in the Moniteur,
sadg that that Paper comes out in the morn.
To 2'4 Gayette de France late in the afternoon.
4%4-1 the sceptical, however, we have the best
stsisiattti bet lieve that our Government are in pos-
te subi tgil morning, of .important despatches on
ilAks," of our relations with Turkey, from Lord
Which ;at least this is believed in the City,
Co Put Put an end to all doubt.
and le;,;'4ol)ened at 854, but instantly rose to 86 4,
,I"et -ana. ulne at 864 ; a trifling reaction then took
t ;,,t"eY seem to have settled for a time at
81
tit for "ift quotation, 85i 6 for to-morrow, and
:tuterqacte4ll4noay ; India Bonds are 82 ; and Ex-
the 3 prem. The English Market has
/he Foreig:ll all the attention of speculators, and
business of •'Lluds have consequently not had any
'aPre
:r4itu ts ;114bPuttance or novelty. Mexican Bonds
; Colombian, 30 i;
604.
only 7zilian, 604
44
74i a 4; Russian, 93 ; and Danish,
Real del Moz,4l4tion in Shares is an advance in
Three per Cc to 30 50 prem.
taunt, 854 6; tar' Consols, 854 6; ditto for the Ae-
; Exchequer-if:4' January, 864 ; India Bonds, 82
Foaxicx.—mil al 3 inn.
Chilian, 26 8 ; 604 1 ; Buenos Ayres, 56
184.1 !; AleXican,g-4:14n, 30 ; Danish, 604- ; Greek,
511," ; Peruvian, ger Cent., 42 3 ; Ditto, 6 per Cent.,
; Spanish, 113, 6 ; Portuguelie) 15-. i ; Russian,
A =s..—Anolo
Pru,
mil; /30!. At'
_,-"‘ln, 60 55 dis. ; Brazilian, 4.5
d ""•Colombian,12 13 per share ;
el Afonte, 30 50 pna
•knited Meak", 17 16 dis: Tlulpuxabua, 50 30 dis. ;

TWO O' CLOCK . 4, Consols have i
~41 4 for January, next • w stated with con
-'elice that Governr,- It is no .
nlproved to 86k for account, and
_
froth v:. n
1 - -,4r. oTRATI.ORD CANII__ ,
'NG at Constantinople,
tne
account
Government have received desatches
►contents of which not only in the Gazette de France, but are highly favourable
to an amicable settlement of the differences with the
confirm the
Turkish Government as to Greek affairs. Exac-
t', Bills hme risen to 54, 55, and India Bonds
') 87 premium. Mexican and Colombian Stock
are a little lower, the former being 53.41 54; the
latter 294 30. dreek 184 19. Spanish "H.
TIJREE O'CLOCK .
consols for to- morrow, 841 I. 34
TIE -----14,y.
A Der

DetachmentYr9in Westminster of
for the 36th Foot marched
on Saturday
ristol, on route to Dublin.
Detachmenthom of the 65th Poet marched on Saturday
A estminster fear Bristol, on route to Naas.
_ A Detachment of the 70th Foot marched on Saturday
from Westminster for Bristol, on route to Fermoy.
A Detachment of the 77th Foot marched on Saturday
frOm Westminster for Bristol, on route to Belfast.
I)etachments of the Ist Battalion of the 60th, the 96th,
to the 2d Battalion of the Rifle Brigade, marched on Sa-
y fr:im Westminster for Bristol, on route to Plymouth.
Mat
A :Detachment of the 2d Battalion of the 60th Foot
ched on Saturday from Westminster for Portsmouth.
4Y A Detachment of the 35th Infantry marched en Satur-
- front Westminster for Portsmouth, on route to Jersey.
avr
A Detachment of the 2d Battalion of the Rifle Brigade
iin town ou Saturday from Scotland, and marched
for D'isktli on route The n
a Deal, —ellot of the 85th Regiment of Foot has embarked
un to Plymouth.
v°a'd the 4ord Suffield transport, for Guernsey.

REV. MR.-..._
Air
bishops, nani:kly of
aIAGUIRE.
CASHEL, and
ARMAGH, DUBLIN,
The four Arch-
.- TuAm, have asserted that they neither collectively or indi-
. vidually offered any living tar y Rev. Mr. MauutßE to leave pecuniary
Catholic Church.
..-Southern Reporter.

LAW Tr, tT,IGINCE.-(THIll DAY.)

COURT OF CHANCERY.

fl RE HOLIES.
This matter stood at the head of the paper, hut.
his Lordship thought it would interrupt the hearing
of the appeals, and consequently he ordered it to
stand over to the latter part of die day.

EX DANIEL IN THE MATTES OF BARNES, A BANKRUPT.
Mr. HORNE on the part of the assignees of So-
larte in this case, submitted that an affidavit con-
taining a verbatim •report of what passed •in the
Court of King's Bend should be taken off the. file
on these grounds,—first, that it was not a proper sub-
ject for affidavit, and next (if it were) it could not
be evidence, inasmuch as it was a verification only of
what passed elsewhere upon a different' question
than was now to be brought before the Court and
between other parties, and that therefore the affi-
davit was impertinent.
Mr. TRESLOVE followed on the same side, and
submitted the affidavit ought to be taken off the
file, and the parties ordered to pay the costs.
Sir CHARLES WETHERELL submitted, that this
was not such an affidavit as ought either to be taken',
off the file, or sent to the Master for impertinence.:
Counsel were in the habit of taking such short notes,.
that he considered it almost- of vital importance to
the carrying on of business, as it was now conducted
in our courts, that short-band notes should be re-
ceived: if the subject matter was relevant to the:point
brought before the Court, he thought the Conrt
ought to enlarge, rather than throw a damp on this
mode of facilitating the progress of business:

Mr. SUGDEN and Mr. MONTAGUE were on the
same side.

His LORDSHIP thought this.was the verification of
a precedent elsewhere, and as all parties had con-'
sented to take his judgment upon whether such an
affidavit as this ought to be= made or not, he was
clearly of opinion it ought mot, and would order it
to be taken off the file, and the petition'i to have
the costs.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
The Court was if possible .more crowded this
morning than on any preceding day, in expectation
that the Orator of the Areopagus would be brought
up for judgment.
Lord TENTERDEN took his seat on .the Bench
soon after nine e'clock, and Was occupied for s.uvut
an hour in disposing of undefended causes.
The Court afterwards sat in Banco, and upon
their Lordships taking their seats Mr. Justice BAILEY
intimated that the three Judges would- sit on the
Wednesday and Friday after Term to get through
the Crown Paper, on the Monday and Wednesday
following to get through the Civil Paper, and on
the following days for new trials.
The ATTORNEY-GEERA.L moved the Court for a
rule to show cause why a criminal information should
not be granted, agaiiist Mr. Carr, for writing a letter,
provoking Mr. Whittaker to fight a duel. The par-
ties are residents of Hull, of which city Mr. Whit-
taker is an Alderman. It appeared that Mr. Whit-
taker hired a servant, who had been in the employ-
ment of Mr. Carr, before'hiS- year of service bad
expired, upon which Mr. Carr wrote' to Mr." Whit-
taker, reproaching him ,in very coarse language for
engaging his servant, and concluding by saying, that
only he (Carr) was prevented by some modern dis-
tinction of law, with respect to menial servants, he
would have. the servant sent to the tread-mill for a
month, and that.it would be a great public benefit if
he (Mr. Whittaker) was made to accompany the
servant there.—The Court granted the rule.

THE KING V. CHARLES LINDOW.

The defendant in this case was brought up for a
contempt of Court, in not having attended a sub-
poena to give evidence against a prisoner, tried for
a capital felony as the late Old Bailey Sessions.
An affidavit in mitigation was put in and read, in
which the defendant stated, that he had attended at
the Old Bailey on the trial in question, but that he
felt some conscientious scruples against giving evi-
dence, which might lead to the capital convic-
tion of the prisoner, and that those scruples ope-
rated- so forciblir on his mind, as to create
considerable bodily infirmity which induced him to
quit the Court. The defendant also stated, that he
was arrested on an attachment, and kept in custody
for three days, and that he was not in prosperous
circumstances; and was informed that the costs of
the proceedings against him would amount to .50/.
Mr. BROUGHAM addressed the Court in support
of the affidavit. He particularly pointed the atten-
tion of their Lordships to the candour and honesty of
the defendant, in admitting that his mind was ope-
rated on by a scruple of conscience, for if he
chose to keep this secret locked up in his own
bosom, and to have pleaded bodily infirmity as an
excuse for not appearing on' his subpoena, it would
have been impossible to contradict; but by his con-
fession the defendant had shown himself to be a

man of pure and honourable feeling, however mis-
taken he might he in his scruples. That he was
guilty of a contempt could not be denied, but since
the commission of that offence he had conducted
himself with propriety, and as was stated in his affi-
davit, he was not a man in affluent cimmi,tances,
and had already been put to some expence in the
transaction. Under those circumstances, he hoped
their Lordships would not think it necessary to visit
the defendant with any very severe punishment.

Mr. ESPINASSE followed on the same side, and
stated that the defendant was the son of a gentleman
of the bar, who was unfortunately prevented from
practising, and that he possessed no other income
but what he received for salary as a clerk.

The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, that after the
modest addresses made on behalf of the prisoner, he
did not think it necessary to trouble their Lordships
with many observations. The Law Officers of the
Crown had thought it necessary to call for judg-
ment for the sake of example. If scruples of con-
science were admitted as an excuse for disobeying a
subpoena to give evidence against a prisoner, gentle-
men might next have scruples of conscience as to
appearing for a prisoner, or as to attending as jurors
or witnesses in any case, and thus the whole system
of the administration of justice would be obstructed.
Having made these observations, he felt it his duty
to add, that the conduct of the defendant was not
marked by any circumstances of peculiar aggravation.
Lord TENTERDEN said, that this was the first in-
stance, within his recollection, when judgment had
been called on against a defendant for neglecting to
attend a subpoena on a criminal prosecution. The
defendant had been guilty of that offence ; but as he
had already suffered some pexsonal inconvr:lience,
and was put to some exwise, though lie (Lord
Tenterden) hoped to nothing like the amount stated
in the affidavit, the Court was disposed to deal le-
niently with the prisoner, and therefore only sen-
tenced him to remain in the custody of the Marshal
of the Marshalsea for a fortnight.
GRAND JURY FOR MIDDLESEX.

The Grand Inquest for the County of Middlesex
having gone through the presentments submitted
this day, came into Court to be discharged, and the
Foreman handed up a paper signed by the Jury,
complaining that they had been compelled to meet'
and perform their duty as jurors in a paved passage,
where the coldness of the weather was intolerable,
and where their deliberations were open to observa-
tion from person's going along the public highway.
These circumstances they begged to submit to their
Lordships with the hope that some arrangements
might be made for the benefit of their successors.
Mr. Justice BAILEY said, that the Court would
take care that the communication of the Grand Jury,
should be submitted to the Secretary of State, from
whom, no doubt, it would meet with attention.
The Grand Jury were then discharged.
THE XIN4; V. HALLET AND OTHERS.
The defendants in this case were brought up for
judgment, having
been convicted of a conspiracy,
to sue out a fraudulent commissibn of bankruptcy
with the intention of defrauding creditors.
Whilst the Lord Chief Justice was reading his
notes of the trial, one of the defendants, a person
named Thompson, fell into convulsions, and was re-

moved from the. Court; uttering the most piercing
shrieks;
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, that' it was not
intended to call up the unfortunate man who had
been seized with the fit for judgment.
Lord TErvrEupEN.--Then why was he brought
here ? , . •
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL.-I don't know, my
Lord. , •
Lord TOTERDEN.--7Then.we shall dispense with
his attendance again. .
Mr. GURNEY moved the judgment of the Court
on William Hallett, an attorney of the Court,
Thomas Oliver, and Zachariah Thompson, who were
convicted at the London Sittings of having con-
spired to issue a fraudulent Commission of Bank-
ruptcy against Hallett, for the purpose of defeating
an execution ,under which his effects had been seized. •
The COMMON SERGEANT and Mr. HUTCHINSON
were heard in mitigation. of punishment, and the
ATTORNEY-GENERAL in aggravation. ,
Mr. Justice BAYLEY, after commenting on the
crimes of the defendant Hallett, in having committed
perjury and fraud, sentenced him to be confined in
Newgate for eighteen calendar months. The
Learned Judge stated that Hallett, as a conse-
quence of his guilt, nuist, be struck off the, rolls of
the Court. • .
The prosecutor did not press for judgment on
the other two-defendants.