The Sun.
London, England, 1842-04-14 00:00:00

BONDED CORN.

Mr. HUTT said he had no wish to press his Bill
on this subject, in consequence of the wish expressed
by the Right Hon. Baronet.
Sir R. PEEL said he hoped. the Hon. Gentleman
would abandon his right, because if he did not do so,
it would place him (Sir R. Peel) in an invidious posi-
tion. As other Hon. Gentlemen waived their right, he
was sure he would consent not to throw any obstruction
in the way. He had consented to the first reading of
the Bill, and had done every thing in hig power to
facilitate it. He hoped the Hon. Gentleman would
do what others had done, and would not stipulate for
any particular exemption.
_ _

111 i . llUrr said ilia if there was any advantage
in opposing his request, he would not press it.
FOREIGN FISH.

Captain PECHELL said, previous to the recess he
had pointed out to the Right Hon. Baronet that
unless some steps were taken with respect to the con-
veyance of foreign fish, the proposition of the
Right Hon. Baronet would be rendered nugatory,
as foreign vessels were allowed to enter our ports.
He was glad that he had attended to his suggestion,
and that the fish of foreign countries were
not to be imported except in fishing vessels.
He now wished to know, whether the Right
Honourable Baronet was prepared to give pro-
tection to English fish, and whether there
were any treaties of reciprocity with other powers 'on
the subject.

Sir 'ROBERT PEEL said, he would give
protection to English fish, and there were
treaties of reciprocity, but he could not consent to
postpone the alterations he intended till the treaties
were concluded.

Mr. E. RICE thought the proposed alteration in
the tar:fl would lead to collisions between the Eng-
lish and foreign fishing-boats.

ICETURNS.

Captain BOLDER() brought up certain returns,
which .•ere laid on the table.
FEES TO SCOTCH JUDICIAL OFFICERS.

Mr. FOX . MAULE said, that certain returns
had been moved for on the 9th day of
March, of the names of those judicial offi-
cers in Scotland, who had taken fees in the
execution of their official functions. He believed
that those returns might have been made be-
fore this time, as, in most instances, he
thought the returns would be nil. He wished to
know when it was likely they would be laid on the
table ?

Sir JAMES GRAHAM said many of the 'returns
had been already made, and he apprehended the re-
mainder would be made shortly.
INCOME TAX—ADJOURNED DEBATE.
The Order of the Day for resuming the adjourned
debate having been read,
Mr. ALDAAI said that in moving the adjourn-
ment of th e debate last night, he was not actuated by any
desire to delay the measure of the Right Hon. Bart.
His motive for making the motion was, that there
were several Hon. Members, connected with large
constituencies, who had not spoken on the question,
and were entitled to be heard by the House upon a sub-
ject of such importance as this was. Besides, the
debate not having been resumed on last evening till
eight o'clock, only three Hon. Members of each side
had had an opportunity of speaking, and he consi-
dered, therefore, that they were entitled to have
another night's debate. Hon. Gentlemen on the
other side taunted Hon. Members on that (the Oppo-
sition) side with representing hole-and-corner meet-
ings as assemblages of the public, convened to express
their disapprobation of the income tax. For his own
part, he had not engaged in any agitation against the
income tax during the Easter recess, but he had been
requested to attend a meeting of his constituents,
which was crowded with artisans and members of
the middle classes in that borough (Leeds)
and the feeling of the meeting was one of uni-
versal condemnation of the income tax.—(Hear.)
The people of every country, but more especially
of England, had naturally a great aversion to any
interference with their private affairs. This was
a very natural feeling. The result of a man's
embarrassments being known would almost effect
his ruin. That House would always be subject to

the eha-fge of ciaas legissiaunias,-, real property
was placed on the same footing as personal property.
He thought that if any machinery could be contrived for
discovering the exact amount of every man's income,
the tax would not be so objectionable. With respect to
the timber duties, he thought that the Right Hon. Ba,
ronet had acted with great disinterestedness, as he got
no thanks from any class of the community. The re-
duction would have the effect of making houses and.
shipping cheap, which of course was not agreeable. to
those who had houses and ships, and whose property
would be depreciated. But still it Was desirable to have
cheap shipping to compete with other countries, and to
have cheap houses for the comfort of the people.—(Hear,
hear.) The latter were of more importance than many
might suppose. In those countries where (as in Scot-
land and Ireland) timber was scarce and-dear, not only
were the dwellings of the people bad and comfortless,
but their whole condition was miserable ; but in Norway
and Switzerland, where timber was cheap, the houses
were good, and the people wealthy. He ob,;ected to the
income tax proposed by the Government, because he
believed it would place men in such a position
that they would be tempted to commit perjury.
By the income tax the .word and the interest
of a man would be brought into direct contradiction.
He did not believe that after the machinery of the income
tax came to beunderstood, that when surcharges had been
made—when the kind of inquiry became known which
the Income Tax Commissioners would have to institute—
when these • things became known • and felt, he did not
think that the income tax- would be tolerated. The first
assessment might be made, but he doubted whether a
second assessment would be practicable.

Mr. ESCOTT thought the Government measure one
admirably calculated to meet the exigencies of the coun-
try, and just the sort of measure which, under existing
circumstances, the Government ought to present to the
consideration of Parliament. Before going into the
question, he wished to clear away certain impediments
which had been thrown in the way by lion. 'Gentlemen
opposite. They bad taunted Gentlemen on his (Mr.
Escott's) side of the House, with their silence. Was it
extraordinary that the independent majority of the
House—(A laugh)----should take time to consider the
great questions which had been proposed. to them, before
coming to a decision ? The Noble Lord, too, had taunted
them with coming to the House, not for the pur-
p,:se of voting for what they believed to be the right,
but for the purpose of . voting for what they
thought necessary to keep a Ministry in power.
That charge appeared to him most extraordinary,
when he recollected that it came from the Noble Lord

who had taken as prominent a part in reforming fa;
liament,- and who was so complacent and contented so
long as the majority of that Parliament suited his pur-
pcise and kept him in power.—(Hear, hear.) So far as
was consistent with the respect which he felt for the
Noble Lord's character, he was bound to give that charge
an unequivocal denial. There was a silence which had
been observed on the other side of the House as well as
on that—a total silence as to the causes which had made
it necessary to resort to these measures. The question
was not 'between the old financial system of this country
and the new one. The financial systems of Lord Liver-
pool, of Mr. Canning, of Lord Ripon, of Lord Grey, of
the Duke of Wellington, had been annihilated and
destroyed by the late Administration and the late House

of Commons. On both sides of the House it was
admitted that the old financial system could not supply
the necessities of the State. The question, then, was
between the system proposed by the light Hon. Baronet
and the system of last year, rejected by Parliament and
the country.—(Hear, hear.) The country had, no
doubt, well weighed the advantages which they were
likely to derive from those measures., With respect to
sugar, they had incurred great risk to their colonial
possessions, and gave a stimultis to slavery-, which they
had paid twenty millions to abolish. With respect to
timber, he knew, from consultation with persons inte-
rested, that at first they were in. favour of that part of
the Noble Lord's budget becoming a law, in the hope of
gettinx, cheaper timber, but, on an examination of the

question, they were persuaded that the only way in

which they could obtain cheap timber was by giving en-
couragement to the importation of Canadian Umber.
With respect to corn, it appeared strange to him that the
Noble Lord, who, in the last Parliament, was strongly
in favour of a fixed duty, should, in the present one, have
declared that his fixed duty of Bs. was to end in a va-
nishing point 'of is.' He explained that,
..by stating
that he reserved to the Queen the power of re-
scinding the duty by an Order in Council.
What ! the Noble Lord, the great leader of
the Whigs, make the Queen the imposer of the bread
tax ? Was that the Noble Lord's idea of the Consti-
tution ? He knew that among many agriculturists there
was, an opinion that a fixed duty of some kind, though
not an Bs. duty, would be a better protection to agricul-
ture than the fluctuating duty. The Noble Lord said
that when the price rises he would take off the duty,
and he therefore hoped' that the farmers, when lie ap-
plied to them for support, would remember that a fixed
duty was to be taken off as soon as the price rose conve-
niently high.—(Hear, hear.) He wotild now 'say a few
words on the measure proposed by the'llight Hon. Ba-
ronet. His measure consisted of two partsone impos-
ing a tnx,•and the other remitting taxes. Now, what
was the state of the country ?,,'?,There was a deficient
revenue for which they must impose taxes, and the
commercial depression- of trade demanded that they
should remit those taxes which pressed upon its elasti-
city. Both these parts must be taken together, and one was
not to be considered separately from the'other.—(Hear,
hear.) The tax which the Right HOD. Baronet proposed
was to be imposed according to the annual income of
each individual to pay, and, in that respect, there was a
distinction between tine present proposal And any othei,
'income tax which preceded it.—(Hear, hear.) All per-
sons who had not an annual income of 1501. were to be
exempt from the tax, and he did not hesitate to state
that, by fixing the tax at that amount, no poor man in
the kingdom would be liable to it.—(Hear, hear.) Then
looking to the other part of the Measure, he thought that
the remission of taxes would compensate those whose
incomes subjected theta to the tax.—(Hear, hear.) The
income tax would fall eventually and justly on the two
greatelasses of the community—the owners of land and
the hoarders of money. Those were classes which he
believed every man in the country would
_wish to see

made contriliute to the exigencie; of the State on great
emergencies. He did not think that those classes would
contribute more than they ought, and whatever they did
pay they ought, to consider it as an insurance
paid on their great possessions. (Hear, hear.)
He would take the measure as a whole, and he would not
be captious in looking into the different articles of the
tariff—whether it may not press heavily on one class or
another, or that one individual might be injured by the
adoption of such a measure, unless he saw there was in
that tariff any provision
.which might be likely to cause
great distress to large classes of , the people. Upon this
principle he must object to one part of the tariff. He
alluded to the two articles of shoes and gloves. He was
a little afraid that pushing the principle of free trade to
the length to which it was proposed to push it upon
those articles would do more harm than it would benefit
the consumer. He thought this applied particularly to
the case of gloves. With respect to the glove trade, at
all events, he thought there could be no doubt that the
wearer could better afford to pay a shilling more than
the maker could to sell for a shilling less. Still taking
the measure of her Majesty's-Government as a whole,
he was bound to give his vote for it ; for the only pledge
he had been required to give at the last general election
was that he would support the Right Hon. Baronet,
whom the country at large had pointed to as the man
to whom .the Government should be entrusted. He
had considered the propositions which had been made
by her Majesty's Government ; he believed it was ne-
nessary for the good of the country that those proposi-
tions should be adopted, and there was nothing in the
taunts of the Noble Lord which should deter him from.
expressing his opinion. He thought all men of property
ought to be thankful for the opportunity afforded them
of contributing to the exigencies of the country ; and
the Right Baronet was entitled to the gratitude of the
country, for his foresight in providing a remedy for
these evils.

Mr. PARKER, as the representative of a large con-
stituency, felt that he should not do his duty to those
who sent him to the House if he did not shortly state
his reasons for saying " No" to the proposition of the
Right Baronet. lie was ready to admit that if the Right
.Han. Baronet had brought forward a liberal and
enlarged system of commercial policy, he for one should
not have objected to adopt his income tax at such a price.
But the Right Hon. Baronet in his tariff had not placed
upon a satisfactory basis the grea questions of corn and
sugar. It was clear that the income tax was a tax which
could only be defensible, either upon the ground that it
was expedient to submit to it as the price of some
great advantage, or that it would be advisable to resort
to it in order to meet some great national danger.
Agreeing with the Right Hon. Baronet as to the expedi-
ency of keeping the income equal to the expenditure
and admitting the great evils which arose from a tinan-'
cial disorder, lie could not concur with him has to the
necessity in the present case of resorting to an income
tax ; neither, so far as he was able to judge,-did the
state of our foreign affairs justify the Right Honourable
Baronet in asking for such an extraordinary supply.
It did not appear to him a fair proceeding to attempt to
justify those measures by events that had occurred since
they were first submitted to the House.—(Hear, (tear.)
Whether right or wrong, they were propounded before
,the melancholy news that had recently been reeeived
had reached the borders of this country, and must
therefore be considered without reference- to that
intelligence. He saw nothing, therefore, to justify
the House in resorting to an income tax. The
Hon. and Learned Gentleman had alluded to an` ob-
servation of his Noble Friend, to which he thought too
much importance had been attached. He believed that it
was applied to a class of gentlemen in that House who
had certainly threwn the first stone at the Noble Lord,
' and if they entered into a crusade against the Noble
Lord in this style, they could not complain if his Noble
Friend did that which he was perfectly able, though not
always willing, to do, and gave them as good as they
brought. The Hon. Gentleman. had stated that the
merit of this property tax was that it would give an
increase to the buoyancy of the mercantile interests of
the country. But how did it stand with regard to mea-
sures in themselves creative as to commercial, and
productive of a revenue at the same time,
while they did not make any demand on the
pockets of the people ? In other words, he begged
to contrast it with the budget of the late Government,
which would have produced a large revenue from sugar,
corn, and other articles. He regretted that he had come
to the conclusion of voting against the propositions of
the Right Hon. Baronet.
Lord SANDON remarked on the frequency with
which the budget of the late Government had been re-
ferred to, after the condemnation it had received froth
the former House of Commons, whose verdict was con-
firmed by the people at the general election. He believed
that the condemnation which was given to that budget 1.
was not more than it merited ; nay, he believed that it
was hardly equal to it. Asa measure of commercial re-

form, it might be open to dispute, but as a inee-
ef finance for supplying the deficiencies of the
it was perfectly worthless. What single icons conTs,
rely on to make up the deficiency ? They toecheo'
timber, nod sugar. Take the article of corn—nt;,-
could they relyfor a revenue from that ? Did it not"'
entirely on the coming harvest ; whether it was ti tit'
or a bad one, they would get nothing, as if it w"r!,,
they Would not have occasion to import., and if lee
not, the price would probably be so high that .the
have to take off the fixed duty. In the article of
es
there 'Would have been a total uncertainty, dePenel7o
the extent to which' foreign sugar -displaced out e`,
And in timber the same uncertainty would exist,
getting any revenue arising entirely from the Prnrs s,ril
in which the Canadian timber displaced the I.ll,ltl'e
her, which had hitherto paid the highest duty, 01.'
means- of supplying a deficit, the budget was t,
worthless, and was it now to be called from the slop ,
in which it had Ikea entombed, and have a ne°l
breathed into its body by those who 'irgl!re
most interested in opposing the present P
sition ? An attempt was made to prop it,
vague and general allusions to other k' ,r
taxes that hail been repealed since the end of' Inge
They then relied upon the revival of taxation foto"'
the deficiency. Would they then have increased
I for the purpose of reviving the languishing trade -
manntactures of the country ? No. Would 'thee
crease the excise or the assessed taxes ? 0131
would find the assessed taxes snore burdensome then
fessional men did ? • With respect. to all that
about the effect of the income tax on the cornmere;gieo
munity, he would state one fact a hich would s'l°oo •
fallacy of those arguments. In Liverpool a petill° f
got up against an income tax, and laid on the table° e
Exchange for signature, but after lying thel:s3.
some hours not a single signature was -be
though the petition had been read by several inerc.fe
The disasters in Affghanistan were not to be est.los"
by the mere losi of men ; they should also take b•
b•
count the circumstances under which these disastfeci'
occurred. It was not like the case of a loss in for 101
because the 10,000' men who had perished in a
nistan might require 30,000 or 40,000 men to
them. Whether any portion of the expenses IV
were to be borne by,this country, or whether 11000'
come to the assistance of India merely by a
either case it was fitting that the country shoul"rd
that England would, in some way or another, gut, ft
the payment of those expenses. It should not 041,
gotten that the effect of our resources in Delis nest
be deeply felt in China, and might necessitate iliSee4
expenditure in that quarter. In any case the
lbouge
war was a heavy burden upon the nation. Ile 401'
the evils of the income tax would be colorieerg;
by the improvement which it would enable the lobe
ment to effect in our commerce. For his part, bee 01i6,,,
that the tax would realise a larger sum than Os*, tbt
rated by the Government, and sveild enable
• further to diminish the restrictions upon commely:t. •steer.
all events, he believed that they should not 11",,,reirs
support the temporary pressure of the tax in the be'
circumstances of the country. Complaints oitir,
made of the severities with which the tax w°1,e,41
upon men of professional incomes ; but, it aPPL,;OI4j
him, that it would be impossible in a matter of t"_,
to take into consideration individual exceptin4l,
should be recollected, at the same time, that tbeeie
inroad which was made upon the protectiv! 11,1
would tend greatly to reduce the expense of
should not have expected so badly of the refornie"eichl
of Commons, as that it would present the aspect :r
did at present. The large constituencies .i de
country said not' a word about the ' tax, whet; cefs
representatives in that House were doing all tLici„lir
to paint it in the most odious colours. He belieo
the first impression made upon the House, bYi,e
nouncement of the Right Hon. Baronet, was
it je.117,1
correct—(Hear, hear)—for no one could "1' :else
there was a distinct acquiescence of the 113,°6;
(Hear.) The Morning Chronicle hesitated ,Inbeit
days to give any opinion on the income tax, anetelts'el
organ of the late Government thought it convemeeso74
ter a protest against it. But the example of thiitoc,6,
had not been followed by the Whig papers in 10e
and Yorkshire, whose editors had praised ine brie
worthy of the occasion.—(Hear, hear.) Befereeele
down, he must beg leave to say a few words On {fist'
posed alteration of the sugar duties. The 04 17
Dr.
guished advocates of the abolition of slavery, - lel
ington, Sir F. Buxton, and Lord Brougham, estlfs
pressed, at different times, views in accordance 1111,0'"
of the present Prime Minister, and were of oririseve
nothing could be better calculated to induce Marone., °lfs
Guadeloupe to follow the example of this coull!'sse
showing them that free labour could compete wit° jei4o•
Without admitting foreign sugar they had goolset
much revenue in their 40,0001 as had been fj
by the Right Hon. Gentleman the late Chancellor
rte
Exchequer as the amount derivable from higfte ere
ty
alteration. This was not beside the question u'eta ee
House,' inasmuch as Hon. Gentlemen oPro,"
taunted the Government for their conduct 10 ibiso
to that question: He felt it necessary to trial° too:
ference, and he thanked the House for the a
with which they had listened to him. BO ace
Sir C. NAPIER said, if he believed an inceilleelkei
necessary for the interests of the country, it sh4)ooir'll"
his immediate. support ; but •he believed that 001,1 es
might have been derived from other sources ', s'e. ed
the deficiency. - With respect to the sliding seen, Jo re'
was part of the plan of the Goveinment, 7,t0
believe that that wits at ell- calculate' c`
lieve the distresses of the country. lelescle
not believe that it' would have any
remove the old evils. 'Clio Right. Hon. -et, '„re
taking otr the,: ditties upon live inattle,,arsklile
that that proposal steed not excite the fears' l'i;isiutt
, culturists. Now, he (Sir C., N.) was not ;wail teefor'ie
nion. He thought that establishments' wonit'se
abroad to Eitel' rattle, and to introduce- e
err
1 country. That measure, however, would, ilen'etited.,
good to the consumer, and he should silPrs. ntl
thought - the Right Honourable Baronet vf,' tie; 1001
his plan with regard to the timber "n 'et
°
. would support it.—(Heate hear.) He -1, v
upon the disasters which bad occurred acs s' •
as a light matter. Nothing had happens" 0.00,1e,'
mutiny at the Nore likely to be of such dritsreefsl'''
I sequences to this country. The disasters 01' to gi
anti of Walcheren could not be compare,' ;boots
I and he hoped that the Right Hon. Baronet,
eni.e
• sures which he was about to take to repair tlliesli‘!
• tees, would send out a sufficient force ; thg:teiVir
rememberahose words of the Duke of Wellio;- 00; 14
Hon. Gentlemen opposite were so fond of °)/1,1
engage in a little war.—(Cheers.) He elnie tVefr
same time observe, that the little wars wnlesee'eir
Administration had engaged in had all beentbsP,
With regard to China, he thought that if in
fling of the contest with the Chinese therea 1140/
a little more expenditure of powder, an WV
less expenditure of ink—(" Hear," and fi'etig.V,e,
the Chinese affair would have been settled
(Cheers.) He hoped we should make our `Ye% efii!,
Chinese strictly a naval war—take. possesslveseeSel:o
coasts, and declare our intention of keeping.b'dgiiii"n
until our demands should be satisfied. 'flint, elto(l,s
would be much better than undertaking an,j be see'
into the interior of the country. It weal tee peht
better for the interests of the country if titenf the serr°l
parties would consent to a compromise. e'es
Hon. Baronet. had accepted the Bs. fixed (-111/C.e‘elle
the sugar duties, and the legacy tax, lie (s'clois'.leo.ll,4
believed he would have been able to have t
tax of 2 per cent. upon property, and 1 per /el)°, ee be
be
Neverthelesie if the present proposition slonie alt!e Oh;
by a large majority,' and he believed it i'be°l3l,bseg„j
trusted that his Noble Friend would allow es '0").:',1
brought in without further obstruction, °, r elll.l.;‘erl]g
the time of the House might thee be bet`eoligT4'r
than in discussing it night after night'e tired alp
cheers.) He did not think that too lonnilee•gePjet
yet been devoted to the discussion. The:), l'estll`„,-et
for Winchester had just told them th,n..'„,:4oo'et
necessary to take time to consider the suqr-d-001
all his consideration that Hon. 'Member had Jog >01);
forward anything very extraordinary.---(1' .tea eergiel
allusion to th proposition made Ortijer 0%!
1,1,
Lord to give her Majesty the
appwer., L. in 4,001
circumstances to do away by Oruei-aill,
with the corn duties, the Hon. 111einber ,ebilenee.albs
will a great Whig Lord ask the Queen of 'Se pr°lo.es le,
on a bread tax ?" Now, the Noble Lnre to.l c'iffed
was, that the Queen should have the hteiell.
bread tax off—not to put it on—so O. not ' fa
Napier's) opinion, the lion. Member 11" °Las
much by his consideration.—(Laugh ten) e,rehl'ebe 111
Mr. TROTTER regretted that tbeeeag .0114 e,
should have indulged in the lalTe agl
to
clone when speaking of some of t/efteoneete the
supporters of the Right Honourable es4'lle
ther or not the agricultural Members bust tee decie„sl
dignation of the country, he would leariear tareeasnet
to determine. For himself, he did "(4i/1 thc,ho
He (Mr. Trotter) had full confidenreie in the jo
the Right Hon. Baronet. He conceit tart' ',eueenilneld
expressed by the Noble Lord the Secee greet "floes' ete
lonies, that the war in the East was the eps
and required the deep consideratiotte-weeiitn'ilielt;so
the country. Great expenses wou''' `what e4'
0171 rsol
tailed on the country by the war. ler feem reset
of India, and from what he had hear,',,lievecl (Wt."
had been connected with India, he we-ori theta ill•
they conquered in the !East, then ee a les sof
ties commence. This war would hal to
let es
about, their necks. With rose:, ho
kr:
up j
posal , of the Noble Lord opposit°te rea..
eeel se, •
that if those proposals were calculatedo!:oo hew f ;415
-deficiency in the revenue, he did tlt 3 r-
or -
necessary to have recourse to a loan,ad been 10104,41
interest. The table of the theist,
anufactort el else;
epe'
1-o wentP
ties, but those petitions see d, and he•
petitions as to the distress of the for
tax, as it was termed, on breaffect
to that our he
this would have the contrary
,• I respect to ote 4
Vi it 1
repeal of the duties on corn.
1,0 was compe e
eelsicbe
Tireliesave:
believed that the distress would
come tax, lie must say that . •
it as the best measure that could
Guildl"l. ref?
large meeting had been held
say
so, for 61°4 eif
le be broutght fr°.l. j:leg
Queen andm:
as ropi %Iti
by
in deprecation of that income
.ns,p 6,pber
of atdhdereseisnineugly,tiltilf he
Robert Peel. At that meeting, 1 Lau_
euiciing
pieo
jesty for consenting to. h
herher subjects, and
effect the State equally wit
to the ee" ; ,e'
concluded with another resolution
the proposal, a resolutionbesavla.
feel.was the bs,e,:oi
,• Robert
tax, as proposee by -ir
_,Heee, bear, 'erfel
Sal'retno7the 1tt..01:°,5,
propounded s
d that 1-lon. Sic'lee
ssuitrleeritnhgat t(hoenicidirbccumstances of the country, t`lt-,;t he
Ministerial benches.) 'He truste. e
bad opt" e
opposite would allow • that the opinion he
who had keit sat do" 10,0,
speech of the Hon. Member
I 0 lid reso6 t° ,1$;)
wailsinnoot
fel reason why they s
on De,
any power
tax bearing _eie
come tax. If this wort .
eepreo3'"
an individual ospaiindi,"ll.
he should demand the libeerdtyid onot thin!'
til':s:l'.4!

i'":rhe
a lotivsi*
gen' ea: thatlnontsiel etiot
ea-so- 11:stecifumilitndrojriuteitl:
,Itild• liavin,.,,
,'
,'.l',4,,.lb.l),B4l4l)osiii':e)ouLf ttvs;;il,lloX.ooesriittatiol,)‘sleer,inetinelt.r"::::e:l
:assail,
nhadyetiddsiautl,
Itlidna.l:(;hnionaoir).tldbeilineeeoidn(tiltio,r)l.letsafeirl,iemito,dtleyett)nig,xlitritioi,eagia,l:litallilecoitl,v,altlr.:iii
iaz Was • -
1
' uou„.l
' triehhieaceeyneacsyrsri,
teu.tvem,hoaut:iiirlil
recourse
l'rst- of th,se
tO justify site
necessity hal
I liceessity ass
how, then, rn
not believe th
Its these, and
uctieved they
articles. WI
tilege means 1
more,, frequen
utY• They
L'
tely died le
,443 paid, and
llicit there t;
' the,.. face of it
"t,ght to give
:t labouring
"'resort to a
Periments.
was her
ot
:14::}
ii::::lt°letilclus:wtsrniotaileitf6seleyec
:o,iywifheohfndafina
'lle(une tax.
ttu income ta.
it (night to h
the eastern d
Lord exagge;
Perils that at
t'f) make out
that for such
tax, more es
,
ricy, even
Ne thought
.dlgland we
;3.?0,000,000/.
..I'll'. O'Conr
g.rlce, whose
vtdaughter.)
iless of Engl:
uthoritative
tons of the (
the wort
ess.--(Loui
e though.
their resouri
mere they
901. :Sibthor.
i Were. they
Prance lei
'listed. Ho

4, War maker
‘" Hear, hey,
t-'eure in the
!11,. America.-
Were i
tehnepeerr,
"", cause they
114! right of
!test unque:

(
ts4to4,4ek y
11e41(y werelpthatlalaa nnn
uft h •
t at
!lola in tern

46rt if neces
aetua

; a io
tho re`.'
u could
;'ollell6l
itoto
as a goo
nd if 1:
It the,:i

icle
lepentling,
ed our
to,,
exist,
e
loe
e 45
dull%
vris o'1;
the serui
ve I

V(.11
) ro
Soil P
• c uP
LT
010
or to ,
n for mo•
ased ea°
(2. tocle
Wild th6Y,