The Sun.
London, England, 1811-07-02 00:00:00

FRENCH 4PEI:S.

n •
•I k • t'
PARIS, _UNa is sat:,_ t tem Nes ies will
seen proceed on a jriurney to Colppiegne.'
, The fttte.given on the 2:).1 at St. ekti, by order
of 'the Emperor, W 33 a brilliant as was to be expeJ.
ed:- The nninber of spe;lators
300,600.. The gardens were illo:o;n3 ed with eq..11
'ante and nuignihcence.. Their Mak.,s,ies tiav:r.e4
the Park in a, phaeton about,Oi o'clock! They Were
ieeeifed ,wilh the loodeit acattualions. Wi.ei; her
Maies,y approa,7hed a 6,ltimrt surmoonted*l); a kis:
ket of flowers, a dove alighted at her fet, aid pre.
sewed her an ingehib.i3 device. In one part of the
prden, peasants exeente* a rural dance rt.lnd
stltde of tlyunt n. The ebinLdians of the Opeta
Coin:wine, and the best &ricers; performed a Ballet
on a Theatre ere6ted on .purpose: Ever)' part of the
Pall was a scene of life and gaiety—dances, songs;
and ether arnuenients. Madame Blanchatd ascend-
!ed in an illuminated balloon: After being beateti
about by the wind, rain; and hail, for several bout s,
shedescended between .bix and seem next morning,
at• St. Maur; near Vineennes. Their Majesties re.
tired about eleven o'Clo•

Ju n )27,--His Excellency the Dukeof Abranteti
and Geceral Luison ate arrived at P.lrts. he Kitig
~f We4tf)ll:tha and the Grand 1) .k& of \Slur?...
nourg bit left Paris to reiurn to their own terti.‘•
torirs:

His 'Majesty 1:eld a Council yesterday at S.
Cloud.

Ld ifr

COURT OF KING'S I.3FNCIi,
Alr. NOLAN, on a former day, applied- to' the
Court for a rule, calling on tho plaint.ilf, in a ,iyanset
tried before Lord ELt,c,Nnotiouou at the lost ,
to sliew cause why a suggestion should not he
'entered on the record, under tke ACS of
.the 4tith of
the King, pro,Viding for the more etfettual recovery
of Small deUtsin the Borough at Southwark.
The Ael provides, that nil debts under the sum t
at. should be sued for and recover:it-IL! in the Con, t
of Requests, ani, that the plaintiff's pro •eed.n.; fir
,any at her Couit, and obtaining a vercnct tor ;;;,-;s
than 51;shall render him liaole to double costs.' Itt
this case the verdict was only for 31.
hir ALBoT to.day she .%ed cause against the rule,
and conenicd that the present case did not come
Within the 4tith of the li.itta. There %:%%;s a• provi;.,
:sion in I;iis Act, which exempted its operation fiam
cases in which the plaintiff had)] fair catiie
tog his adion for more ti an 51. although it might so
happen, that tie,,tnally he did not recover so ninch,
or in cases when the ofig,inal' sum exceeded that
au.ount, and Might have been afterwards lesserk.d,
by money paid on accoont
The present actiwi had- been brought by• a
plumber tor walk done to the amount of 81. The
plaintil had, howe%er, taken away old lead, &c.
had allowed for theta in his account. This Circuin-
stance induced the Jury to find a vertliU of oniy
Though Ow original iteminll Jnid been for 81. rill
the defection made it less than 61.

Lord ELLENBOROUGH s3id, that the old lead Which
had been taken away might have been melted and
applied again to the work, and the Court was bound
to consider it so re-applied. It so, the materials and
labour did not amount to. 51. and therefore the tbia
must be made absolute.

Mr. Attnor said, his Learned niend need not be
at the trouble of euferiog the suggestion on the re•
cord, as the plaintiff would stay ad limiter proceed-
ings.

•
The following is a copy of. a letter recently sent
by a Noble Peer to his lenants. It we under-
stand, the notice alluded to by Earl STAi.rutira, oti
his late met tuti to the House of Lords :--,
co' 011 A LETTER FROM LORD K. to HIS TENANTS,