The Sun.
London, England, 1842-04-22 00:00:00

41.!c•-"--rs-s--.-:
etse env Honourable Member of corruption. He was IHe had never heard • more shabby-arguments, than those ad-
Ron.iSe coed net do so upon Gentlemen opposite ; but those Yenced in support of that principle. This Lord Mayor of
ac-
e hentletrien must allow that many persons, who supported Dublin said he was in favour of triennial Parliaments, on ac-
;
e ielorrn Billnlid not consider that they cure supporting count. of the particular transaction which gave rise to the Sep•
t
i,e9- °chine' of finality. The situation which he nad the tennial Bill. This would argue an abstract preference for the
1,11 Tar of filling at the time of the Reform Bill, prevented origin of the present system, which was the Revolution, than
w. rem having much to do with the discussion upon it, hut for the existence of a triennial system. The Honourable
ietas free to confess that he never thought that measure was a ' Member for Bolton, more properly, used astronomical
I,t measure. How was it possible that in a country, like Great . arguments in favour of annual Parliaments. He said
iiiiiho, the law couhl always remain in the same state? He the earth makes a revolution round the sun once a year,
st-r that the constituencies had never wallowed in so , the pisnetaey system went through its orbit- once a-year around
se: Political mire and degrading dirt as they had done since ' that great luminary ; and he added with some pathos that trier-
ePe%ing of that Bill.-(Cheers.) When the balance of I chants settle their accounts once aeyear.—(Laughter.) There-
s s.; as so small, great temptation was held out j fore, on the Copernican and the mercantile se sterns, the Hon.
let reons to resort to means unworthy of • any party. ! Gentleman concluded that we should have Annual Parliaments.
lee., lie . must say that he crd not think I He, therefore feared that if the Leatned Doctor
4 „OPle of the country were alive to their situation. He I set up. an agitation against Triennial Parliaments his
setthink that generally they were aware of the import- 1 astronomical arguments would shake the new eystem.
t!f. their political rights. He was afraid that education ! Next, the proposition for payment of Members, would be as-
101,l.spread sufficiently amongst the people. With respect 1 surediy scouted on the other side. The Gallant Commodore
4 trliOtiOii of the Hon. Member for Rochdale, he was not said that if the inhabitants of elarylehone would find him a
t !!lltliold his support from this motion because he (Mr. furnished house and two clerks, be would thankfully accept
e al) could not go the length 4 the Charter. He was not I them, but he would not impose them on his constituents.
erared to assent to the principle of annual Parliaments. He ; Another point further to show the incoherent system advo-
; het prepared to give the franchise to all adult males in the ; sated by some cf the Gentlemen opposite. 'I he . poor
~1P ".re, but he was not prepared to say that the present I man would . say, I don't want to be repre;euted,
e',..,n1 of representation was a good one, or that it was a ; but I want to sit in , this House to represent
filler, road of legislation than which nothing could be ! ray fellow-workmen while nou -represent the rich, and I want
i The Right Hon. Baronet had talked of en extension I you to enable my fellow-workmee to elect me. But I cannot
~,hue suffrage endangering the monarchy, but the Eight I do this ill must be at the expense Of going to London, and give
'l.'', retie Gentleman must I emember that there was 'up the shuttle or the spade; therefore, all I ask is thaCthe affluent
Vetocracy in St. Giles's as well as in St. James's. in circumstances should pay to enable me to sit in, the House in
relegh he should support the Hon Member far Rochdale, behalf of my fellow-workmen. But several of the lion. Gentle-
" did not go for the Charter. But they could - not shut men opposite would not allow this ;;f the plan now proposed
tr
yekteyes to the scenes which occurred at elections, and the was adopted in a modified shape it would be apeesled against,
tun was, How were these things to be avoided ? He was as well on account of a perfect representation as as on ac-
Prepared to support an evil because it had existed for count of defective franchise—in short, the defectiveness of the
IYears; and although the Reform Bill had been passed, he principle of most of the Hon. Gentlemen opposite, as com-
e -11Oreason why they should not go a step further. The pared to the desires for whom they avowei to speak, showed
rI Ron. Gentleman said that they were not to decide the that if he ( Sir 11. Peel) should be in the House ten years
ieSentation numerically, but by property. Although he hence he would have to defend thislaw against themselves as he
etre. Bernal) was not prepared to controvert this position, now had todefend the Reform Bill. On their own principles of
g, did not see why the two should be blended. The nume- of reason and nature they must disappoint the majority of the
1040wer must force itself on the attention of Parliament. working classes, and there would be as loud a cry as ever of a
tree" would ask, whether it was not better to grant what master-class and a slave-class in the country. Again, the
aSked, than to have it forced from them? In Hon. Member for Rochdale proposed that England, Ireland,
thi
ene'"...g on this motion, he wished to guard himself and Scotland be divided into electoral districts, each to return
7' misrepresentation. He was neither a leveller, nor he a Memher to Parliament. The result would be that
,t` an inconsiderate Reformer. He had considered the that earls district would become a manufacturing
~elect seriously, and although he could not whelly agree with borough in a short time. Corruption would prevail as much
,e'llotion of the Hon. Member for Rochdale, yet he thought as it did before the Reform Bill, and the influence of landed
pebetter to remain in his place in the House, and state his property would predominate. The next proposition was that
S.treent s.--(Cheers. ) Members of Parliament should have no qualification. But he
inelrefOllN EASTHOPE, who was for a considerable time need not recapitulate them. The disunion of the opposite
e• ""biole owing to the low tone of voice in which he add' essed party upon these alleged great principles was confessed by
'.4i.lheute, then said he was anxious to say a few words on the Hon. Member for Coventry, when he said they agreed it,
'Llabject. He did not agree with the principles of the the principles, but differed as to the means, and he (Sir 11.
i 'Teti', as it was called—he was quite prepared to agree Peel) :agreed with the Honourable Member for Leicester,
elh' principle of no either qualification being requisite than it would be futile to go into a debate upon such premises,
;effected by the constituent body. He supported universal and, however armed he might be at the alleged bribery
eLage., but with respect to paying Members, he thought it and corruption, srd bribery of election and franchise, he must
V, be a long time before they saw that.—(Laughter.) oppose the motion; if he was asked what would best satisfy
s'! .respect to a division of electoral bodies into districts, the people of the country, his answer would be, that the Idolise
i,, should vote for a Committee of Inquiry. He ought to manifest that desire to ameliorate the condition of the
et
ne; oppose the motion in the terms in which it was people by passing his Income-tax.—( Great laughter and cheers. )
seet'lat torvvard. He had not the slightest notion of conform- This would show that they wished to throw the burdens of the
CAP all the propositions that the motion contained. To State on the wealthy classes. Let them, then, pass his Tariff,
17 of them he assented, and when they were brought forward and they would. prove the desire to promote the comforts of the
qractical manner, as they would be in the motion that mass of the peopk. Having done this substantial and intelligi-
' soon be made by his Hon. Friend the Member for Shel. ble service for them, they would dispense with the necessity of
'ld, h
e would give them his support. - disturbing the Constitution by notions like the present, and of
is C. NAPIER would not vote for complete suffrage or altering the representative system by a step which would dis-
• itinual Parliaments, though some of his constituents had appoint none more than those who, in carrying the
'
es ended. him to do so—( Hear) yet he would vote measure, would gratify their present w ishes. —( Cheere. )
?going into ComMittee on the motion. But he would vote He would advise those who complained of the absence of the
.'we'e no property qualification. As for paying Members of Noble Lord, and who believed his financial propositions to be
erent, if his constituents would give him a house in wise, to stay away—(Laughter and cheers)—that was if, upon
;'t an and a couple of clerks to take care of his the whole, they belieiied with the Hon. and Learned Member
t -re, he should have the utmost pleasure in aces pting these for Northampton, that his measures were likely Sc benefit the
I)l°T.ll,rse--( Laughter.) But he did not see why the community country. He asked them to retaliate upon the Noble Lord by
Oehould be called on to do for a Member that which his . staying away, and not lend themselves to any party combi-
j would not do, and, therefore, he would oppose nation. —( Loud and long continued cheering. )
tie' a general proposition. The recent cases that had been Mr. UNTZ said that he hoped the Right Hon. Baronet
1
al
sefore the House proved the, necessity of some reform in did not include him amongst those who ought to stay away.
'4 uencles. He earnestly hoped that the recommendation —(Laughter.) As he had been one of those who took an
er disfranchisement of the borough of Sudbury would be active part in endeavouring to obtain a reform of Parliament,
Eeinto practice, and by way of making the example more he could not think that the Right Hon. Baronet ought now
' esive, he hoped that those who gave bribes would be pu- to complain if he asked for the Bill, the whole Bill, and nothing
k as well as those who took them..—( Hear.) but the Bill?
tiZty VILLIERS supported the motion for inquiry. There Sir R. PEEL—You asked for it then.
kfkothing that was pointed to as a reason for the Reform Mr. 'MINTZ (in continuation)—lie did net ask for it
;,..41.1 t his Hon. Friend could not now point to as a reason for then, but he would ask the Honourable Baronet the Member
t4t-forin a the franchise, and he hoped, therefore, themotion for Dorchester, whether they had the Lill, the whole Bill, and
el 't he agreed. to. They had ten years' experience of the nothing but the Bill ?—( Hear, hear.) He asked him whether
corking of the Reform Bide Every instance of bribery, they were to have a 101. franchise, or whether they were to
tePtion, and intimidation proved this. His Hon. Friend have it with many drawbacks?—(Hear, hear.) He asked
Oat ask for annual Parliaments, or for complete suffrage ; whether they were to have a 50/. leasehold teuancy-at-will
et! asked for was inquiry, and no one could vote against it franchise ?-4 Hear, hear.) He, therefore, contended that they
4-s's he was determine.l not to extend power to hail not the Bill, the whole Bill, and nothing but the Bill. If
teoeople. He could not at all agree with the they had the entire Bill, the state of the country would not be
441, of his Honourable Friend the Member for what it was.—( Hear.) The Right Fiore Gentleman may have
1110ter for opposing the motion ; and he thought that the great sympathy with the wants of the people, but the great
/teL s!fember fur Rochdale had made out a strong case for the cause of complaint was, that the distress of the country was
~,,tZetion he had addressed to 'them ; therefore he (Mr. NT.) owing to not having a proper reform of Parliament. He had
iNs;',l vote for the motion,- and he hoped it would meet with now mentioned the reason why he for one would support the
tet-eIl suppert, as in agreeing to it no Hon. Member would motion of the Hon. Member. He entirely approved of the vote
Cet himself to any of the principles it advocated.—( Hear. ) by ballot, end• he had no objection to the payment of Mem.
;lighi. 4. PEEL said the Hon. Gentleman, the leader of the her s, became! he believed they would the better attend to the
hree'oOd stated, and no'doubt truly, that petitions from a very interests of their constituents. He did not think that annual
it.' .and important body ,of the community, couched Parliaments would do any good, and he considered that trien-
he°derate and respectful language, on the subject now nial Parliaments would be sufficient for every good purpose.
V! them, had been presented to the House ; and he'(Sir R. Ile was not prepared to go the whole length with reward to the
keVe should be most unwilling. however he differed suffrage. He thought it was a subject for serious reward to
. prayer, to . sayh anything,h in tll:skeeei?jurse Lion, but hw was of opinion that a very great_ extensiol nof
ikitailessshoorulidoit
ffkeertehoaotentiog
tti,letiratfeceoitiidgsa.ppir
iairear,
hear.)dere - tfohre
the ffbreangeefrtwoa; sieecepsesoax, a
tand
ar
gtlem t
butrt wt.,oolu 1 1 nut:he intereston'Y be
INeel° must say that, having watched the political conduct the arisiocrae.y themselve3.—(Hear, hear.) It was his
ter Hon. Gentleman himself, he had always given hiM
.opinion " that coming events cast their shadows before," and
io;^,t for integrity and purity of motives. He (Sir R. Peel) no person ought to be more interested in looking to those
Id for that reason, and also because the Hon. Gentleman shadows than those who had the conducting of the Govern-
',that night addressed the House in moderate and ment; and the debate of the night was one of these shadows.—
Perate language, be sorry to treat with disrespect ( Hear, hear.) fie hoped the Right Hon. Baronet. would
motion made individually by him, and therefore seriously consider , how far it may be within his power to
(Sir , Robert ' Peel) should proceed, rather than comply s.ith the demands of the people. He should, for
',;lent himself with a silent vote, to state very shortly the reason he gave, vote for the motion of the Hon. Member.
,ipounds on which he would give his most decided opposition elm E. TURNER (who spoke amidst cries of " Oh, oh,"
'4" Hon. Member's views; and el
if he avoided stating his and " Dive, divide") was understood, to say that he would
eMks at length. it was because he bore in mind the warning vote for' the motion of the Hon. Member for Rochdale,
qv lion. Member for Finsbury, that tile House would have though he would not, after what lie bet seen take place at
e,3euss this subject once a month for several years to come. the annual municipal elections, vote fix the system of annual
lieers and laughter.) The motion was a peculiar one. • Parliaments.
to 'traced several propositions, and then invited the House Capt. PLUMRIDGE said that he would cordially support
o
Itk Into a Committee to consider them. The Hon Gentle- the motion of the Hon. Member except the last seven lines.
V"ho spoke last was very anxious that whatever they might Mr. COBDEN said that the Right Hon. Gentleman had
~e 53, should at all events consider all the points of the mu- very ingeniously managed to mystify the very simple question
145;., but he (Sir R. Peel) apprehended that what the Hon. before the House.—(Oh, oh.) The question before the House
4er for ilovhdale wished was, a Committee to consider was, whetlier after the people of the country—he spoke of the
's?:: questions for the purpose of bringing in a Bill with re- unrepresented portion—ha t petitioned the House for the Char-
c.e to them, and not a Committee for taking evidence, and ter, they would go into a Committee without at the same time
P' considering those matters. If that were the object pledging themselves to anything?—(Hear.) The difference
e Honourable Member for Rochdale, he (Sir R. Peel), between the Right Hon. Baronet and many Gentlemen on his
.Zhlering that the House had already on their hands the (Mr. Cobden's) side of the House who differed from the people
VOicetax and the tariff, must regard this additional prospect outside was, that notwithstanding that difference of opinion
Ittther Committee of the whole House, to take evidence at they were ready to consider the claims of the people,
lleitr, as another most cogent reason for giving his most de- while the Right Hon. Baronet and his supporters w' mild shut
i 4 °Pposition to the motion.—(Hear and laughter.) He the door upon them, and would not condescend to give them
iiiiktsei ,00t, of course, account for the absence of the Noble any consideration.—( Hear, hear.) That was fairly the state
thik hussell)—(Laughter)—but he (Sir R. Peel) recollected of the case—that was the plain statement of it—but the Right
lit•• a peculiar moment a prophecy he made some ten years I Ron. Baronet mystified it and then slammed the doors of the
4re' that he arehended the day would arrive when the most ' House upon the people.—( Hear, hear.) The flight lion.
eteed enemiesp be of the Reform Bill would found amongst Baronet predicted that if the object of the motion were carried
le Iladicals who then supported it, and that his vote would, ' out it would give increase to the power of the landlords, but the
'tlro- distant day, be required todefend the Reform Bill against Right Hon. Gentleman the Member for Dorchester said that
Ileetllter supporters.--(Cheers and laughter.) And with re- it would disturb the monarchy. 'Were they to be treated
itja 0 the Reform Bill, he would here quote and defend one , in that way with opinions as wide as the poles asunder?—
se: wisest observations of the Noble Lord, that this country (Hear, hear.) Were the people in those circumstances to be
Sj not afford to have a revolution once a year, to , satisfied with the speculatidns of the Right Hon. Baronet ?
ht, ' those enormous changes that were demanded in ' How dexterous and amusing soever he might be, that would
len representative system, and that, therefore, he was ' not satisfy the people in their present state and temper.—
ci-inlined to resist these further efforts at Reform. (Cheers.) What was the condition of the people when they
'iFar, hear, and loud cheers.) The ground on which talked of the Reform Bill? They knew it did not improve
;,loud R. Peel) now resisted the present motion was the same ' their condition in any one fespect.—(Loud cheering from
V, •
on which he made his prophecy ten years ago, when he the Ministerial benches.) He found a sufficiently loud re-
: ) vysed to comply with the wishes of the people. When the sponse to that from the Hon. Gentlemen opposite.—( Cheers. )
C4's in 1830, that the Reform Bill gave universal satisfac- i But were the people physically, or morally, or intellectually
Ilekot° the country—when it was demanded that the Bill better now than they weretenyears ago?—(Ministerial cheers.)
1,,," pass unaltered—that the people must have the Bill, the . Were they not, in point of fact, a scandal to the whole of Eu-
iii ',.' Bill, and nothing but the Bill—( Laughter )—when it ; rope ?—(" Oh, oh.") Was there any national education at
!itttkiasted of as the second great charter of the people, and as- , all ?—( Hear,. hear.) 'Were they not the only people in Europe
'hew that from that time forth corruption would cease, that ' without a national education? Was there not more physical
nvorking classes would be represented by Members who I suffering in this country than in all the rest of Europe ?- (" Oh,
'ill give them perfect satis!action„ and that they would have I oh.") And were these distresses and evils to be remedied by the
kik (lovernments, and consequently that they would have no j impoidtiou of an Income-tax on the industry of the trashing
Ii ceee to wish for further reforms—when all this was said, he 1 elassesof the country ?—( Hear.) Would the country be deluded
4retl on. a prediction, and what the House had that night Iby such pretence3? The real question was, and they should
4
cieLeheVed howe'ver that the Reform Bill was not justly ; gave evidence to show that his prophecy was right.
,
I not mystify what he said, was whether labour was to be re-
presented in that House r not. lie would vete for the mo-
, etehle with the grievous defects now complained of ; but 1 lion of . the Honourable Member for Rochdale, on the
si , 1 he was certain—and the fulfilment of one prophecy ' ground that the labour of the country ought to have
'Ras him he thought in venturing upon a second—of this a full, fair, and free representation, and not from
Nl' certain, that if the majority of those who supported the , any abstract theory of giving the people other
se lanes now proposed had their own will granted to them, that I rights, but because it would insure to them a better state of
b'al'e hence they would find in them as many faults and I hiving, The very instincts of the people would give them better
\4lPointinents as they now complained of in the Reform Bill. fiscal laws than they received from that !louse.—(Hear, hear. )
ll'itkrar, hear, and cheers.) Ire thought it quite clear that The misrepresented people were pining and starving, while
;14.4.10rity of those Hon. Members who would vote for the hundreds of thousands of quarters of corn were locked in their
slyl Member. for Rochdale, were adverse to half of his pro- bonding warehouses. That would not be case if the people
,::'os.—(Laughter and cheers.) It was clear that if the were fairly represented.—( Hear, hear.) lie believed the
~,,,,,,ty opposite could prevail, we should. have this result— middle classes would now have as much interest in giving
!el
tl'eoesion of the suffrage and triennial Parliaments, a rejec- the franchise to the working classes as the working
Nl,' the proposal to pay the representatives of the people, classes themselves. The middle classes found they could
„°te by ballot.—(Hear, hear ) Now first, as to the ex- not fight you. They tried you on thg question of free trade.
Ik'etiti of the suffrage, observe the great 'limitations several of And what was the conduct of the pally opposite? 'they had
Ir. Gentlemen opposite would place on the principle. succeeded by playing off one .class against the other.—( Hear.)
I, il, (41. Member for Sheffield declared himself an advocate That was the policy that was too apparent to be misunder-
'itl, extension of the suffrage, but then he would connect it stood by any one who had a seat. in that House. Something
,tli Property. Why, then he would maintain what he so had been said about danger to the aristocracy and the mo-
Let 'eunplained of in this country—a master-class and a family. The monarchy had been brought forward rather
elte;e'ass ; the latter consisting of those who were taxed; but ostentatiously upon that occasion. Now he denied that there
'Ss 'Presented. The Hen. Gentleman said. that every man was any anti-monarchial feeling among the people of this
1.1/4e ‘:i.as
.eubject to direct or indirect taxation, and who had country ; but he said that towards the aristocracy, and towards
Sit right to vote for the election of :Members of that House, there prevailed a most intense feeling of hatred.—
litit,k4oent, was in the condition of a slave ; and Co Oh," oh," from the Ministerial benches.) W, In if there
$ if you attempted to take his property without were not such a feeling, where was the danger of giving the
;itsrtoesent, was guilty of spoliation and robbery.— people the franchise? He spoke after a pretty extensive ac-
cts,,,.. "et limitation he proposed to the franchise was directly at quaintance with the working classes ; and he did say, that in
,"C,',s'e with this great principle. But this only proved that i the borough of Stockport, which he had the honour to re-
-6t s'r It. Peel) was right in his second prediction, that the I present, a- most intense hatred would be found to prevail
ttis;st'PPosite would not, even if they had the power, make re- among the vast majority of the adult population against the legit-
i ,ciitetion co-equal with taxation. The only assertion he had lation of that House. They attributed their distress directly to the
heid,oring the night which seemed to have the guarantee of legislation of that liouse ; they saw in their closed manufaMories
,hi eiPle for its maintenance, was that representation ought the effects of that legislation, and he believed they were tier-
hit'o-egual with taxation, whether direct or indirect. But fectly right. But where was the danger to the monarchy?
t,,,i(i'lvi'll principle would first of all operate against the fair It was too bad to bring forward on such a subject. as that the
else, ,eY were to be excluded altogether from the franchise.— name of her Majesty, which was more popular than any Sove-
elttee,) This was the tirst.check to their great principle, that reign who ever preceded her on the throne ; it was most unfair
re, 'fling to the law of Providence and the law of nature, no to bring forward her name,
and to make the danger with
k 341111 Wilo was unrepresented ought to be taxed.—(Laughter which she was threatened a reason for denying justice to her
itis eers.) Females were allowed to exercise the right of people.—(Cries of " Hear, hear," and " Oh, oh.") He begged
4 thR at the India House and other places, hut the principle to remind Hon. Gentlemen opposite that the movement for a
N'!lort. Gentlemen opposite would exclude them at once large extension of the franchise was not confined to men of
i!he the franchise. But, according to their principle, every desperate fortunes or of reprobate characters. He begged to
1N;(4 18 years of age, being then liable to serve in the remind them that there were men now at the head of that or-
'llst'ai and to bear the burdens of the State, should, no matter ganisation who Were equal to any of the aristocracy in moral
, thlCi education, be entitled to vote at the election of power and moral worth. He begged to remind them that
IN te „I.' of Parliament. It must be so, if they argued accord- many of them were their equals in fortune. And where, he
j'. tne law of nature an t the law of Providence.—(Laugh- would ask, was the danger to the monarchy from these men ?.
gellkti, cheers.) Therefore, every man of the age of eighteen,
____( Hear, hear.) There was one man in particular among
'tltee."` to taxation, direct or indirect, no matter what his edu- the advocacy of an extension of the franchise, who had achieved
:14, ,-;, Or whether he was a beggar or not.—(Laughter, cheers, I for himself great distinction in another field, and who had
Ott 1,t); do")—he begged pardon, bat he was right, for, was not ' surrounded his name with a halo of glory in another clime__
.ts, teer subject to indirect taxation ?,-( Cheers)—and, there- I one who had won for himself an honour which Hon. Gentlemen
'IN_ ecirding to the law of nature and the law of' Providence,. opposite were now attempting to filch from him for their own
,este entitled to vote, and, according to Lord Camden, it was . purposes.—(Cries of " Name," from the Ministerial benches.).
Ile elation and a robbery to take a man's property without his He could- have no hesitation in naming him—he meant Mr.
Ntej:t•,—(Laughter and cheers.) But then, if this, the bin- ~ Joseph Sturge. ( Laughter, and derisive cheers fi om the NJ inis-
t!'l sifllPrinciple of the Hon Gentlemen cpuosite were true, ! tt•rial benches.) Yea; and those who worked with him in
vve (144,44 ...ye have representatives at all?—why should we ; the cause of the Africans, were joining with him now in work-
% peeates at all ?—why should you take money from amen I ing out the emancipation of teeir poor fellow-countrymen,
isip. as in a minority ?—(Laughter.) NI; hat was this, but who were suffering, he believed, as much of privation and of
ttn':opractiee, I disregard your opinions, but I give you re- i misery at the hands of an aristocracy, as ever the negroes did
k la Z'qtVeS ? and though a man was represented, you would I at the hands of their owners in the West Indies.
V, • tiff,, tesesee to siay—l protest against this, yet, in spite of I Mr. JOHN ARTHUR ROEBUCK said, that he would
Ott ~,4 truth, and ill spite of the law Of Providence and ;only „pey
Ile rtee e the attention of the Heine for a very few
V law .. onn make me pay.— (Laughter and cheers.) i moments. He should no£ like to allow the motion to go
--noosed law, there would be to a division without expressing, in a very few sentences,
kbes, or nature, s ''"ne what hope had the mode in which he considered he was bound to act upon
11/4:14 ~.still under the p. - .i two or 1
.e,
tt,,,i giclass. What confidence 1.--, that occasion. When he looked to the institutions of this
I ey It their new law would . last longer t,,,,...'ev. he saw certain rough methods introduced of attaining
4t ~ar's? Were they not reducing to slavery, according to 50u1,,,, , '' '•-• • the object sought to be attained being that
ragater, . ' Hear hear.) , - • ..ilieenec in the governing body
principle. all whom they excluded? (
- ' ' , a particular obis,. ,
" glad to see that he was convinc ng Hon. Gentlemen j of gettins, that degree of in.... e -"iris in the manner
te 'is
to govern the cm... hithert
which might enable them
(teltieen(Laughter and cheers.) The Hon. Member for •
Nee' was already clearly ashamed of his own Bill.—W3, by
Cr.)eeldopted, as he had already, said a attaining that end, .
) Now, take the question of triennial Parliaments. most conducive to the general welfare. The mode ~ -.P