The Sun.
London, England, 1827-11-15 00:00:00

WARM AIR.

V•
HE Public attention is requested to a
Simple and Powerful Apparatus for WARMING
and VENTILATING BeILDINGS.
.• It 'occupies but
a small 'space, may be fixed in a few days, and will be found
in every respect a most desirable acquisition.
BOYCE and Co., 246, Oxford-street, Corner of Park-
street, where a small pamphlet on the subject may be had.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov. 14.
CORONER FOR SOMERSET.

Mr.•DANIEL moved for an order for the writ de
coroitature =mend() in this case. Air. Knight, who
had formerly appeared against the motion, informed
him that he had now no instructions. to oppose the
application.—Thc writ was accordingly ordered.

COURT OF KING'S BENCIL My. 11.
CRIMINAL INFORMATION.

Mr. BnouGium -rose to move for a criminal it-
formation against James Brown, Esq.- Member of
Parliament for-the county of Mayo, upon the affi-
davit of Sir W. Brabazon. The Court would per
haps recollect that he had mentioned this case last
term, and that hii application was at that - time
against.the editor of a newspaper. The newspaper
had since given up the author of the composition
complained of, which, as it had appeared in a public
newspaper, he would not hesitate to call libellous.
The application which he now made to the Court
was on account of a publication purporting to be the
speech of Mr. Brown in Parliament. Whether the
speech had ever been spoken there or not, he was
not competent to ,say ; but a reporter of the news-
paper said that he received a despatch containing it
from Mr. Brown, whom he had met in the lobby of
the House of Commons. He told Mr,,Brown that
he had not been able to hear what he said, and Mr.
BroWn in consequence suppliedhim with that which,
whether Mr. Brown spoke it or not, was thus proved
to be his composition. It accused Sir W. Brabazon of
having conspired, with several other persons, to
commit murder. Mr. Brougham here read the
speech in question, in which it was stated, that
" men invested with great power should be pre-
vented from inflicting on society the greatest crime
known to the law." It then contained an observa-
tion that " men were now at large who had entered
into a conspiracy to commit the greatest crime
known to the law." To give point to these obser-
vations, Mr. Brown proceeded to state, on his own
personal knowledge, " that after the election, as
some of his friends were with him on their return
homeward, and passing along the highway, a body
of men armed with stones sprang upon a wall, and
discharged them in great numbers at them. The
horses were stunned and knocked down; one was
killed on the spot? several were severely wounded,
every gentleman in the carriage was hurt, and his
own lot was to have a rib fractured. He belieVed
that somebody, to save them; uttered an exclamation
that the police was coming, which alarmed the
gang; they accordingly separated, but were again
approaching to complete the work of destruction,
when two mounted police-men rode upend checked
them. A public inquiry was • instituted into this
outrage by the exertion' of his noble-relative, the
Marquis of Sligo ; and then out of that inquiry came
the fact, tha'. Sir, W. Brabazon, the sheriff of the
County, had received repeated and distinct informa-
tion from the best possible authority, the chietcon-
stable, that a scheme of murder had been long or-
ganized, and was to be put in execution at the elec-
tion, irr order to give it the colour of a mob tumult.
The sheriff repeatedly told the constable not to in-
terfere in his business ; and, in point of fact, did not
station a single officer to prevent the outrage. Were
they to treat such:a matter as a mere election broil ?
The days of contest were genet:ally days of licence,
and many things were permitted during their conti-
nuance, which would be punished with great severity
at another time." The speech, which Mr. Brougham
read with great rapidity, and which we have only
been able to give substantially, then went on to
state, that if such a proceeding were to be allowed
to pass unpunished, the_ only inference was, that the
sheriff and four or five infamous wretches could enter
into a conspiracy to render the civil office unavailing,
and that he could do that with impunity in virtue of
his office, for which any other man in the empire
would be hanged.
The CotinT.—Take a rule to show cause.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Nov. 14.

WATERS V. EROGDEN.

In this case, which has been twice tried, and in
which a rule has been granted fora third trial, Mr.
CAMPBELL, on behalf of the defendant, obtained a
rule Nisi for an attachment against the plaintiff and
his attorney for having sued out 'a writ of fi. fa.,
from the Court of Great Session in Wales, and le-
vied the amount of the debt and costs, in contempt
of the rule from this Court for setting aside the
verdict.