The Sun.
London, England, 1827-10-30 00:00:00

MEETINGS OF CREDITORS.

LONDON DIARY....-THURBDAY, Nov. 1.--(At the Court of
Commissioners, Bashighall-street.)
Bedwin, J., Newgate.street 12 Perryman, F. jun., Ber-
Eciwards, J., Water-Imte. wick-street
Blackfrius lO Bogs and Co., Strand ..... .... 12
11'Niell, W. sen., Charles- Stacey, 1., Newcabtle-st.,
street

COUNTRY DIARY.TAIURSIDAY, Nov. 1.
Ookhead. J., Watlington—Mitre, Oxford l2
serat, J., Torquay—Hotel, Torquay
re, W., Bath—White LiOA, Bath n
Fernihough, J., Froghall—Red Lion, Ipstone ll
Rawson, C., Manchester—Royal hotel, Manchester
Rodway, M., Rodborough—Fleece, Rodborough
Watson, W., Lower Shuckburgh—Craven Arms inn, South-
ampton l2

:NSOLVENTS APPLYINt
Petitions to be heard at Pertuip
Noy. $, A

G TO BE DISCHARGED,
ral-street. Lincoln's Inn Fields,
AT Niu.

Abbitt, G., Stepney . Gibbs, J., Storer-street, Com-
Briesen, C., James-street, Can- mercial-road
non-street-road Harper, W., Crescent.street,
Crauford, M., Newman-street Euston square
Day, T., North Crescent, Bed- Hewitt, W. jun., Commercial-
ford-square road.

COUNTRY..--At the Court.:

Louse,at Bodmin, November 1,

at Ten

o'cloCk.

Floyd, M. .St. Agnes
Pearson, W., Padstow

!Peter, T., St. John's-street,
Clerkenwell

At Wakefield, Nov. 1, at Ten.
Crowther, J., Heckmondwike Redfearn, T., Wakefield
Cunliffe, J., Birstall Spencer, T,, Keighley
Dixon, J., Yeadon Seaman, S., Sheffield
Fox, J., Keighley Taylor, G., Swinefleet
Hargreaves, .1., Midgley Tuton, J., Knaresborough
Naylor, W., Pudsey

HERRINGS IN THE FRITH.—Last week
some of the sage fishermen in Kirkaldy observed certain
phenomena, which indicated the re-appearance of the her-
rings in the frith. A net was forthwith shot, and three
were taken. They were brought ashore in triumph—
gravely laid before a meeting of the Areopagus, and after
due deliberation, the fish were declared of excellent quality,
and it was agreed that the appearances for the approach-
ing fishing are highly flattering. A net was also shot,
and twelve herrings were taken at Queensferry.—Fife
Herald.

A steam carriage is shortly to commence run-
ning between London and Southampton. Mr. G. Rogers,
the proprietor of the Telegraph and Union coaches, applied
road,for the patent for this which is held we believe for
fourteen years, but was too late, it having been previously
granted to Captain Ewarth, of Sloane-street, Chelsea,—
The machinery is contained in a very **mall compass, and
is to propel the carriage at the rate of ten miles an hour.—
At every stage, instead of the old-fashioned way of travel-
ling by changing horses, they will stop for a supply of coals
and water. It is calculated that seven bushels of coals only
will be required for the whole journey.—Hants Advertiser.
PROLIFIC PAlR.—There is at present in the
possession of a burgher in Airdrie, a pair of beautiful
canary birds, which have' at present a healthy brood of
young ones ; and, what is remarkable enough, this loving
couple have, since February last, produced nearly fifty
egg 9, and upon those the parents bestowed so much atten-
tion, that about 30 young birds have, from time to time,
been brought out since that date. We believe this inte-
resting collection is free to the inspection of the curious,
to whom the owner will be glad to afford every informa-
tion.— Glasgow Free Pressi

CORONERS.—Application was made to the
Court at the Old Bailey, on Saturday, on behalf of Mr.
Unwin, one of the coroners for the county of Middlesex,
for a remission of the fine of 101. imposed upon him the
preceding day, by Mr. Justice Park, on account of his (Mr.
Unwin's) having neglected to attend upon the trial of John
Everett, indicted for the manslaughter of Thomas Ross.
Mr. Justice" Park, after conferring with Mr. Baron Gar-
row, observed that it was the bounden duty of coroners,
whenever parties were to be tried upon
re-
turned by them, to attend the Court to give such informa-
tion upon the subject of the inquiry as the Court might
think it necessary to call for. The Court was surprised
to hear that a coroner, possessing such long experience as
Mr. Unwin undoubtedly possessed, should be ignorant of
his duty in this respect. As, however, Mr. Unwin had
stated that he was not aware that it was his duty to attend
upon these occasions, the Court was not disposed to en-
force the fine, and therefore it might, for this time, be re-
mitted ; but the Court wished it to be made known, that
if, after this public notice, any similar case of non-attend.
ince should occur, a fine of considerable amount would be
imposed, and enforced.