The Sun.
London, England, 1820-06-24 00:00:00

L The Times 1

The.dispute betwe,n the King and Queen rather increases
than diminishes in inter, st, of however painful a nature
that interest may be, from the recent discussion of the'subjeet
in the House of Commons. Our own most since-e desire was,
that all differences might have been accommodated by the
impartial, kind interference of the House, We will
even still not give up the hope, though we may akirehend
that the last step 'which has been taken does not lead towards
the desired end. The House on the motion of Mr Wilber.
force, has been indeced to address the Queerr,litunbly reequest-
lug if vee may speak summarily, to overlook the
erasure pf her name from the Liturgy,. it being well under-
stood that such concession on her part was for the sake of
peace only, and was not to be construed into any' admission
of criminality, or even any fear of her enemies—fear, in the
language of Mr. Wilberforce, being as far from her nature
as from that of the Duke of Wellington. Now, we can
readily conceive a position of affairs, in which such a request
from the British House of Commons would liave almost com-
manded the acquiescence of her Majesty. But we. entreat
the nation, and even the House of Camtuons itself, to con-
sider under what circumstances the House now presents its
petition. A recurrence to the green bag would now indeed
be laughable enough, and would be laughed at by the
whole' nation; but absurdities are not necessari), im-
probabilitieb in the land in which we dwell. Would
not the- most natural course have been to have first re-
commended the removal. of the green bag from the table,
even if this had been done with some previous understanding
from Mr. Brougham, Mr. Denman, and Mr. Williams, that
in that caw they would not counsel her Majesty to refuse the
request of the House ? And then it might have been
reasonable in the public to expect from her Majesty a relin-
quishment of some of the nice punctilios by which she thinks
her honour guilt ded. The proceeding of last night, though
brief, was nut without its due degree of interest. Front this
it appears, that her Majesty, on the very first ascertaining—
and that only by the public journals—that her name was
omitted in the Liturgy, though without advisers, without :LC-
curate knowledge of the meaning, intent, and consequence of
such a circumstance, instantly wrote to Ettglan.l to complain
atilt erasure.--.We understand that the Deputation of the
House Of Commons will wait upon her .`.Majesty this day, at
one o'clock. The Members will appear in their Court cos-
tume.

THEATRICAL REGISTER.
• Performed Last Night.
THEATRE ROYAL, DRURY-LANE.-(4th Time), -David Rizzio:
Rizzio, Mr. Braham ; Mary Queen of Scots, Mrs. W. West.
After which, Giovanni in Ifpn4un.
THEATRE ROYAL, COVENT-GARDEN.—The Lord of the Manor.
Atter which, a Grand Concer4 and The Libertine.

TO CORRESPONDENTS.
The Communication from Dnblin came too late, and is too
long for insertion this day, but shall appear on Monday.

lie* For Provincial Journals, and The Colonies, see the
Fourth Page.

ST JOHN THE BAPTIST.—Huliday at the Bank, Exchequer,
East India, aad South Sca Houses.

AmulvEb-4 Dublin, ljlolland, I France.

Dusa-11 Holland.

HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW.
Mornitig, 7 wittutcs after t.—Evetiing, sa atitiutes otter I.

THE SUN.

SOLENI QUIS niteße. eAt.sum- .MEAT ?

LONDON,
SATURLLIY, JUNE 24, 1820.

We received this morning the Paris Papers of
Wednesday last. In the Chamber of Deputies on
Tuesday, the Minister for Foreign Affairs pre-
sented a projet fpr authorising the Minister of
Finance to pay seven milli6ns of francs to
Algiers, under the Treaty of the 28th of
October, 1519, for the discharge of the meats
under the Treaty of the 17th of December.,
1801, between France and the• Regency of Al-
giers. The projet was referred for examination
on Wednesday. The discussion on the Budget
was then resumed. In the article entitled Military
Intendances, the Committee hail proposed a
reduction of 100,000 francs, and this amendment
was, after some debate, cartied upon a scrutiny,
102 to 91. The Budget of the War Department
(the General Budget being divided into several
smaller Budgets, one for each Department of Ser-
vice), came next under review, and of this, afer
considerable discussion, the consideration was
postponed till Wednesday. The following are
extracts

" Pmus, Jtnn. 21.—The King transacted busi-